BV 2500 .A3 S8 V.l
Stock, Eugene, 1836-1928
The history of tne Cnurch
Missionary Society
The Right Hon. the EARL OF CHICHESTER.
President of tuf^ Church Mission.uy Society, 1834-18S0,
HISTOEY
OK TIIK
CllUriCII MISSIONARY SOCIETY
n^S ENVIRONMENT, ITS MEN
AND ITS irORK
EUGENE STOCK
EDITORIAL SKCRETAUY
IX TIIllKl': VULIMES
VOL. I.
"Thou'^h thy beginning was small, yet tliy latter end sliould greatly
ineroase. For enciuirc, I pray thee, of the former age, and prepare thyself to
the scari-h of thy fathers. . . . Sliall not they teach tlieo, and tell thee, and
utter words out of their heart ? "—Job viii. 7, 8, 10.
"That they might set their liope in God, and not forget tlie works of t!od,
but keep His comniaudniouts." — P.s. Ixxviii. 7.
I'O UK Til TlIO USA .\ n
LONDON
CHURCH MISSIONARY SOCIETY
S.VLISBURY S(jrAi{i'. l-C.
1899
\_AU r'ujhla rcH-rvp<V^
I.OXDON :
I'l.'lNTED BT GILBERT AND niVINGTON, tV.,
ST. JOHX'S HOUSE, CLEEKKSWELL, E.C.
THE MOST REVERP:NI)
FREDERICK
J.OUl) ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY
PRIMATE OF AT.L ENGLAND
AND METROPOLITAN
Tins WOIiK IS, BY HIS GRACE'S PERMISSION,
RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED
I
PllEFACE BY THE PllKSIDENT OF THE
SOCIETY.
"SIy friciiil and iVllnw-workLT gives mo 1 lie })rivileL;'o of writing
ii lew words of preface for liis interesting and valnable coutribu-
tioii to the due celebration of our Centenary, of wliicli I gladly
avail myselt.
If, as we earnestly hope, the completion of one hundred
years of effort and of blessing is but tlie introduction to and
the starting-point of the greater efforts and fuller blessings
which our Heavenly Father has in store for us, it is surely
right that we should be reminded of the faith and perseverance
of the early founders of our Society, which enabled them to
surmount obstacles from which our path is free, and overcome
dilhculties of which we have little conception.
The expansion of England, the stages of its development
from tlie little; kingdom of Alfrtul to the; l^hnpire within whose
bounds nearly a third of the human race own allegiance to
Queen Victoria, has for us all an absorbing interest. Little
less marvellous, even more absorbing, is the record of the steps
by which God has led us on our way. What joy it is to tell
how tiiere has been given to us day by day and year by year
that of which we have liatl need : how door after door has
been opened, and one after anotlier has been raised u}) to enter
in or to go out and take up the work that lay to our hand to do.
Side by side witli the story of the C.]\[.S., nay, closely inter-
woven with it throughout, is the story of the awakening of the
Church of England from a state of torpor and deadness to an
increasing sense of its high vocation, its great responsibility. We
read of the efforts made to remedy the results of past neglect,
and to seize the glorious and ever-widening opportunities of to-
day. Light will be thrown by these pages on the methods of the
revival, and on the men who were the chief actors in it. I do
vi Preface
not think that more honour has been given to the Evangelicals
than may be fairly claimed for them ; nor has it been sought
to depreciate the efforts of those vs^ho in all loyalty have
sought to bring into greater prominence the teaching of the
Prayer-book and to add beauty and dignity to the worship of
Almighty God.
It is often assumed that the Evangelical movement has spent
its forcOj and that it is no longer to be accounted as a power in
the Church. To statements of this character the history as
recorded here, not of thirty or forty, but of a hundred years of
missionary work conducted on Evangelical lines, affords a full
and adequate answer.
From the beginning to the end of the period under review,
and even to this hour, we may claim for it an inspiring and
continuing power which has made and is making its influence
felt far outside the limits of its own party, and indeed of any
particular school of religious thought. That this influence may
be continued and extended to the end, even through the perilous
times of the latter days upon which even now we may be entering,
should be our earnest prayer.
May it be that when we shall have passed away, and the
history of our time comes to be written, it shall be possible
to say of us that we have not been unworthy of the great men
who have gone before us, nor unfaithful to the great principles
which they handed down to us. May ours be the honour to
strive to keep alight the missionary torch which they placed in
our hands — nay, more, so to feed and fan the flame that the
dark places of the earth may be illuminated with increasing-
force and v/ith brighter and clearer light.
John H. Kennaway.
EscoT, Januarij, 1899.
AUTHOR'S PREFACE.
I.
The History ol' tlie ('liurcli ]\[issionary Society was first planned,
ill view of the coming ('entenary, in 1891. The work was
t'litrustod to the llev. Cliarles Hole, Lecturer on Ecclesiastical
History at King's College, London. Mr. Hole's intimate know-
ledge of the Church history of the century, and particularly of
the period at which the Society was founded, marked him out
as pre-eminently the man for such a task. The plan was that
he should compile what might be called the Library History
of the Society, probably in four or five substantial volumes.
Hut the thoroughness with which he executed the earlier part
of his work became an insuperable obstacle to the accomplish-
ment of this scheme. The time available was nearly half gone
before he could complete the first volume, and that volume
only brought the narrative to the year 1814. ]\[oreover Mr.
Hole's other engagements stood in the way of his continuing so
large a work. What he had actually done was therefore pub-
lished under the title of TJie Earhj Rixtonj of the Church
M't.^.sionnrii Socicfij ; and that book remains a monument of
industrious research and skilful arrangement of materials, and
must always be of the deepest interest to students of the period
covered, as well as to all who love to trace out the providence
of God in the beginnings of great enterprises.
It was then proposed to continue the History in much the same
form, though on a smaller scale ; and for this purpose the Com-
mittee engaged Dr. W. P. IMears, late of the South China Mission.
He began admirably ; but he was presently compelled by the
state of his health to abandon the task.
Then it was found necessary to commit the work to me, and,
for that purpose, to relieve me of my ordinary editorial duties.
The time still available, however, did not allow of a compilation
being prepared which should be a continuation of i\[r. Hole's
book, upon the same scale. A new History, therefore, had to
be written independently from the beginning ; although it could
not but be largely indebted — as it is — to Mr. Hole's able and
comprehensive account of the Society's earlier years.
viii ALrTfmii's Preface
The candid critic willpi-obably complain of tlic size of the work.
It may perhaps be pleaded that if biographies of individual men
of the century required three and four volumes — -Bishop Wilber-
force three, Lord SIniftesbury three, Dr. Pusey four, — a History
which contains in a condensed form materials for a hundred
individual biographies is not unduly exacting iu demanding
three.
This consideration may be more fully appreciated if the scope
and design of the History are explained. Let it be noticed that
they are expressed in its title. The History of the C.M.S. :
Its J^Lwikonment, Its IMen, and Its Work. I have de-
liberately set myself to try and describe the Society's Envinm-
ment at home and abroad ; and a very large part oi' the book is
devoted to that attempt.
II.
There are the Environment abroad and the Ihiviron.iicnt at
home. Tlie treatment of the former has involved the inclusion
of much collateral matter. Men are necessarily, and naturallv,
introduced who were not C.M.S. workers, and events that belong
rather to general than to missiomxry history. For instance.
Bishop Selwyn is a i)rominent character in some chapters ; and
both his struggle for what he regarded as the liberties of the
Colonial Cliurches, aiul the sad story of the Maori war, are
noticed more fully than the mere history of the New Zealand
Mission would itself require. Again, the West Indies IMission
was but short-lived; but the painful narrative of the oppression
of the slaves is not omitted, nor the strenuous labours of Fowell
Buxton in obtaining their freedom. Again, a good deal more is
told of the origin and extension of the Colonial and Missionary
Episcopate than is absolutely necessary to the story of the
C.M.S. Missions. In the Africa chapters, also, and in those
on China and North-West Canada, there is a good deal that
is collateral. But naturally this feature of the work is most
conspicuous in the India chapters. Eulers like Bentinck,
Dalhousie, Canning, the Lawrences, Montgomery, Frere, and
many others, are prominent figures. So are Bishops Heber,
Wilson, Cotton, ]\[ilman, Dealtry, Cell, &c. The reforms under
Bentinck, the developments under Dalhousie, the struggle with
Caste, the Sepoy Mutiny, the Neutrality Controversy, the bold
Christian Policy of the Punjab men, the Brahmo Samaj and
similar movements, i)ass before us iu succession.
On the same principle, the operations of other Societies, both
within and without the Church of England, are frequently
noticed. It has been my special desire to do justice to the
Author^ s Preface ix
Society for tlie Propagation of the Gospel, — the ehler sister
of the C.M.S., as the founders and early leaders of the C.M.S.
always called it, A careful study, indeed, of the missionary
history of the century shows how much the C.M.S. owes to other
organizations, of which its supporters are for the most part
unconscious, — while on the other hand there can be no doubt
that others are more indebted to the C.M.S. than is commonly
acknowledged. What do nut all Missions in India owe to the
educational worlc of Duff and other missionaries of the Presby-
terian CUiurches of Scotland ? What do not Missions in China
owe to the China Inland Mission? What do not Missions in
East Africa owe to the influence of Livingstone and to the
linguistic labours of Bishop Steere ?
Roman Catholic Missions also find frequent mention ; gene-
rally, it is to be regretted, in regard to their aggressions on the
work of Protestant Societies, of the S.P.G. and others as well
as of the C.M.S. ; particularly in India and New Zealand, and
more recently in Uganda.
III.
The treatment of the Environment at home involves the study
of the history of the Evangelical School or Party (or whatever
it may be called) in the Church of England. It is usually
said that the Church Missionary- Society is the most impor-
tant Evangelical achievement. I do not at all agree with this
common opinion ; but the fact that it prevails certainly shows
that the Society's position at home, and its relations with the
Church and with other Church organizations, call for special
attention in such a book as the present. In short, the history
of the Society is quite a different thing from the history of the
Society's Missions. Accepting this fact as a guiding principle,
I have devoted probably one-third of the whole work to the
affairs of the Church and the Society at home.
But I have had another motive in doing this. The Evan-
gelical body in the Chui-ch of England is constantly spoken of
as dying or dead ; and this view is fostered by the Church
Histories of the period. They unanimously praise the men of
the Evangelical Revival at the end of the last century — the men
who in their own day were utterly despised, and altogether
excluded from the counsels of the Church ; and they affirm,
with the most extraordinary inaccuracy, that the Evangelical
School was dominant in the Church during the first forty
years of the nineteenth century. But then they absolutely
ignore all it has done in the past half-century — with possibly a
passing acknowledgment that the C.M.S., after all, is alive.
X Author\s Preface
and doing something. In fact, they treat the Evangelicals, in
regard to the practical work of the Church, as " a negligeable
quantity." My hope is that this History may do something to
correct this curious misconception.
The chapters now referred to are, however, not merely a sketcli
of the history of the Evangelical School. They aim at being a
sketch — very inadequate and imperfect, indeed, but still a sketch
— of the history of the Church of England as a whole, from the
Evangelical point of vieM% The growth of what may be called
" Church feeling," as witnessed by the revival of Convocation,
the establishment of the Church Congress, Diocesan Conferences,
the Lambeth Conference, &c., &c., and the extension of the
S.P.Gr., is traced out — and traced out, it is hoped, in an
appreciative spirit.
In these chapters, I have not attempted to conceal what seem
to me to have been the mistakes and the weaknesses of the
Evangelical body. Although a writer who essays to be a his-
torian cannot be neutral, he ought to strive to be fair and
honest. That has been my unreserved desire and aim ; and
honesty and fairness arc never manifested where a writer has
only good words for his own " party," and only hard words
for other " parties." But whatever mistakes may be admitted,
it is nevertheless true that a large part of the immense
development of the Church's practical work is due to Evan-
gelical Churchmen. This, of course, is not the common
opinion ; but I think I have presented a good deal of in-
disputable evidence that it is the correct one. The general
failure to perceive the fact is probably owing in part to tlie
circumstance that some of the movements and agencies which
have given warmer life to the Church of England during the
last forty years have had a " non-denominationar' origin;
and it is true that a considerable section of the Evangelical
clergy have held aloof from them on that account. But
their influence has been great nevertheless : great for Evan-
gelical religion ; great for the progress of spiritual life in
the Church of England. They have, in fact, corresponded in
many respects to the revival movements of the eighteenth
century : mainly, as then, carried on by Churchmen ; though
mainly, as then, not definitely " on Church lines." It is not
wise to prophesy ; but my expectation is that, although so
ignored now, they will be recognized fifty years hence, just as
the revival movements of the eighteenth century, not less
ignored at the time, came to be recognized long afterwards.
For these reasons, the Home Chapters are not limited to an
account of C. M.S. i^cYf^owiel and of the growth of its organiza-
Author'' s Preface xi
tion. Among prominent cliaracters in these pages appear sncli
personages as Bisliops Blomfielcl and S. Wilberforce and Arcli-
bisliops Tait and Benson, as well as Canon Hoare, Mr. Penne-
father, and Sir Arthur Blackwood— to say nothing of living men.
But of course the oihcers of the Society naturally occupy
the most conspicuous place. Henry Venn is without doubt the
leadino- figure in the whole book. Josiah Pratt and Edward
Bickersteth are also in the front, and Henry Wright and
F. E. Wi'oram; and Lord Chichester, the President for more
than half li century; and Principals Childe and Green; and
the editors of the Intelligencer, Eidgeway and Knox. Kidgo-
way's utterances on important questions are more often quoted
than those of any other person except Venn and Pratt.
IV.
But undoubtedly the larger part of the work consists of the
history of the Missions ; and the student will be able to trace
out the story of any particular Mission in which he is interested.
Sierra Leone, for instance, or New Zealand, or Tinnevelly, or
the Punjab, or China, or North-AVest Canada, or Uganda, can
be studied period by period.
The missionaries" themselves are naturally among the most
important characters; and it is hoped that speakers at mis-
sionary meetings, and others, will find abundant materuil for
sketches of the lives of men like W. A. B. Johnson, W. Jowett,
S Gobat, Henry and William Williams, H. W. Fox and
R Noble, T. G. Ragland, J. Thomas, J. Peet, C. G. Pfander,
C. B. Leupolt, E. Sargent, G. M. Gordon, H. Townsend, Krapf
and Rebmann, Bishop Horden, Bishops G. Smith and Russell,
Bishop French and J. W. Knott, Bishop Hannington and
Alexander Mackay. Or of living men like Robert Clark and
W. S. Price, Bishop Moule and J. R. Wolfe, Bishop Ridley and
Bishop Tucker. Or of Native clergymen and other converts,
such as Abdul Masih, John Devasagayam, Paul Daniel, _W. T.
Satthianadhan, V. Sandosham, Nehemiah Goreh, Jam Alli,
Lnad-ud-din and Safdar Ali, Dilawar Khan and Fazl-i-Haqq,
Manchala Ratnam and Ainala Bhushanam, Samuel Crowther
and other Africans, Legale the Tsimsheau, Dzing Ts-smg,
Tamihana Te Rauparaha and John Williams Hipango.
Many great questions of missionary policy are touched upon
in these pages, not, indeed, in the way of formal discussion, but
rather of historical record. The relations of a voluntary society
of Churchmen to the official authorities of the Church come
into view in many chapters ; and so do its relations to the
bishops of the dioceses in which it works, particularly m con-
xii Author's Preface
nexiou with Bishops Wilson, Selwyn, Alford, and Copleston.^
The great problem of Church organization in the Mission-field
has two chapters to itself, one on Colonial Churches ~ and one
on Native Churches.-' The varied methods in Missions, evan-
gelistic, pastoral, educational, literary, medical, industrial, all
receive more or less notice in various parts of the work. The
political relations of Missions present important questions which
are illustrated in many of the episodes recorded : particularly
in India,'^' but also in Turkey,'"' in China," in New Zealand,' in
the West Indies,''^ and in the Yoruba JMission.'^ The duty of
missionaries in times of danger is a question that may arise
suddenly at any moment ; and the utterances on it of Henry
Venn in the name of the Society^" deserve special attention.
In the home organization and conduct of societies, the CM. 8.
has initiated most of the methods which have come to be
generally adopted, such as Public Meetings, Provincial Asso-
ciations, Association Secretaries, Unions of different kinds,
Missionary Boxes and Sunday-school Collections, Sales of
Work and Exhibitions, Missionary Training Colleges, Finance
Committees, a Working Capital, &c., &c., the origin and growth
of which appear in these pages. ^^ Some developments supposed
to be quite modern are found to have been thought of, and some
of them acted on, in bygone days. The plan of a family or a
parish supporting its " own missionary '' turns out to have
been formulated in Annual Sermons preached sixty years ago.^-
What is now called the Policy of Faith — the sending out
of all missionaries who appear to be chosen of God for the
work in faith that He will also supply the means necessary —
is found solemnly set forth by the C.M.S. Committee in 1853 ; ^'
while evidence is afforded by the experience of the years
] 865-72^^ that if the contrary })rinciple of lletrenchment is
acted upon, and men are kept bade, the result may only be
heavier deficits than before, while tlic total number of labourers
actuallv shows retrooression.
V.
The history contained in these volumes cannot be regarded
merely as the history of a Society, or of a School of Pteligious
Thought, or of a Church ; nor does it merely illustrate lines of
policy, methods of work, systems of organization ; nor does it
^ Chaps. VII., X., XI., XXV]., xxvii., xxxiii., xxxviii., lxiv., lxix., lxxx.,
LXXXIV., liXXXVII., &C.
^ XXXVIII. •* LV. "* XLIV., XLV., XLVI., LIX., &C.
^ XLI., LXXV. ^ XLIX., LXIV., LXXXI. ' XXVIII., LXVII.
^ XXIII. " LVi. '" XLV., LVi., ; see also xvi.
11 X., XI., XIX., XXXI., XXXV., LIII., LIV., LXXI.. LXXII., LXXXV., LXXXVI., &C.
'■' XIX. '•' XXXV. '^ LI., LII., LIII., LIV., LXXI.
Author's Preface xiii
merely commemorate the lives of men, however good ami noble.
It is coucerned with something much greater and higher than
these. The trne idea of Missions is not grasped unless we
have eyes to see, on the one hand, a human race needing a
Saviour; on the other hand, a Divine Saviour for all; and,
between the two, the men who know Him, commissioned by
Him to proclaim His Message to those who know Him not._ The
history of a missionary society is the history of an association
of some of His servants for the purpose of fulfilling that Com-
mission ; which Commission, therefore, is the subject of the
First Chapter of the present work. Realizing this, we areat
once lifted on to a level far higher than that of a rallying-point
for a religious party, or of an instrument for the propagation of
particular views. It is right and wise, indeed, remembering
the wide diversity of opinion among Christian men upon all
sorts of theological and ecclesiastical questions, for those who
are substantially of one mind upon these questions to combine
and work together. In so imperfect a state as the present, this
method of doing God's work is the most practically successful.
But while each association may rightly claim this liberty, and
allow it to others, let its members rise in motive and aim to the
height of their calling. If they are Churchmen, indeed, let them
say so, and not be ashamed of it. If they are Evangelical Church-
men, let them say so, and not be ashamed of it. But let them,
first of all and above all, be Christians, humbly rejoicing that
they know Christ as their God and King, and working their
association, consciously and purposely, for no object whatever —
however good in itself — lower than the object of bringing their
fellow-men to the knowledge of the same Christ.
The history of the Church Missionary Society, then, is the
history of an attempt, through the medium of such an associa-
tion, to take a definite part in the work of God in the word,
the work of calling men back to their allegiance to their One
Ptightful Sovereign, and of proclaiming His gracious offer of
pardon and restoration, through His Incarnate, Crucified, and
Exalted Son, for all who return to Him.
This is the greatest of all " the principles of the Society."
Three others naturally follow. The first is that those only are
qualified to call men back to God's allegiance who are His true
servants themselves. Perhaps we are too ready to boast of
what is called " the C.M.S. principle. Spiritual men for spiritual
work," considering our own spiritual failures and unworthiness ;
but the principle, nevertheless, is obviously and indisputably
right. The second is that we are to be content, in actual
missionary work, with nothing short of the real return to God
of those who by nature are alienated from Him, that is, their
xiv AUTHOR'S Preface
real conversion in heart and life. Tlie third is that the
qualifying of men for such a service, and the success of their
efforts^ are the work of the Holy Ghost alone.
The indirect and collateral influence of Missions is not to
be despised, and is now generally acknowledged. They have
promoted civilization ; they have facilitated colonization ; they
have furthered geographical discovery ; they have opened doors
for commerce ; they have done service to science ; they have
corrected national and social evils ; they have sweetened family
life. Many Christian communities in the Mission- ficdd are very
imperfect ; but at least they are better than the Heathen. The
shipwrecked sailor loses his fear of being robbed and murdered
when he spies a Bible in a native hut. The Bible may belong
to one who never reads it, and by whom its precepts are
neglected ; but its very presence is an indication of better
things. Nevertheless, all these indirect and collateral results
are not the primary aim of a Christian missionary society. Tliat
aim is the salvation of men.
There are also results of missionary work which, unlike those
of a scientific or material character, cannot be called indirect.
]\rissions extend the visible and organized Christian Church, or
Churches ; and, in due time, they make Christian nations.
Such results as these are to be aimed at, and prayed for.
Viewed, however, in the light of eternity, they are not the end,
but the means to an end ; they are chiefly valuable in so far as
they promote the salvation of men. The grand aim of Missions
is (1) to fulfil the Lord's command to preach the Gospel as
a witness to all nations, which affects eternity because His
Coming depends upon it •, and (2) to gather out of the world
the spiritual Church which is the true Body of Christ, and
which will live on into a future when all earthly Church
organization is forgotten.
While, therefore, the pages of this History which deal with
ecclesiastical controversies, problems of organization, social
reforms, and the like, may seem to be specially important, the
reader who thinks of the salvation of men will turn with even
more interest to those which sketch the story of the individual
servant of the Lord who goes forth in His Name, or of the
convert whose life and whose death illustrate the power of
Divine Grace. Many pages that are thus occupied will, it is
hoped, evoke songs of praise and thanksgiving, deepen the
reader's faith in his Saviour and Lord, and send him to his
knees in fresh and humble dedication of himself to the pro-
motion of a cause so sacred, so blessed, so certain of ultimate
triumph. He will learn that missionary advance abroad
depends upon spiritual advance at home ; that the increase of
Author's Preface xv
men and the increase of means follow upon seasons of revival,
of the reading of the Word of Grod, of united and believing
prayer, of personal consecration to the Lord's service. He will
— G-od grant it! — yield himself more wholly to his "glorious
Victor," his " Prince Divine," and realize that even he, sinful
and unworthy as he is, may, through the gracious condescension
of his Heavenly Master, have a small share in the work of
"bringing the King back."
VI.
It is right to say something touching the sources of tliis
History. For the first fifteen years of the Society's existence,
I am chiefly indebted to Mr. Hole's previous researches, em-
bodied in the important volume before mentioned. The
Eleventh Chapter in particular, on the first Associations and
Deputations, is almost entirely based upon his work. The
Society's Reports from the first, and its principal Periodicals,
have of course been studied page by page. The forty-two
volumes of the old 3Iistiionary L'egister, 1813 to 1854, are of
extraordinary value to the student of the period, as containing
the current history, not of the C.M.S. only, but of every other
Society. I have described that wonderful periodical at the
end of my Tenth Chapter. For the second half-century, the
Church Missionary Intelliyencnr is the best source of informa-
tion on C.M.S. affairs; but the Missionary h'egister has had no
successor, and my notices of the work of other Societies become
fewer and fewer in later years, because an examination of their
several Reports would have been an utter impossibility in the
time at my disposal. I have, however, made frequent use of the
valuable S.P.G. Digi'sf, and of several books of recent date
describing the work of the London Missionary Society, the Uni-
versities' Mission, the China Inland Mission, &c. The Minute
Books of the C.M.S. have of course been carefully examined,
and also a host of documents, written and printed, on all sorts
of subjects ; but I have not followed Mr. Hole's good example
of industry in reading the thousands and thousands of MS.
letters among the Society's archives. He did search out those
of the first fifteen years. To do so for a hundred years would
be a task quite beyond my power consistently with other duties.
Mr. Venn's Private Journals, and many of his letters, however,
have been kindly placed at my disposal by his son and daughter,
and have naturally supplied important information. The cream
of them, however, had already been published in Mr. Knight's
J3iography, which book has in other ways also been a help to me.
Biographies, in fact, have been my best and most interesting
authorities next to the current Reports and Magazines. They
xvi Author'' s Preface
have continually thrown side-lights on the history, and furnish
the personal touches which, it is hoped, Avill be found to add
much to its interest. No historian of a century could in two
years examine the letters, &c., of a host of the leading men of
the century, even if they were accessible to him ; but wdien this
has been done by their biographers severally, and the results
published, the historian may rightly make good use of them,
and is wise to do so. I certainly owe much to biographies
such as those of Wilberforce and Buxton, Scott and Pratt and
Bickersteth and Simeon, Martyn and Heber and Daniel Wilson,
Marsden and Henry Williams and Selwyn, Carey and Duff and
John Wilson, Cotton and Milman and French, the Lawrences
and Herbert Edwardes and Bartle Frere, Fox and^ Noble and
Eagland, Gobat and Bowen, G-. M. Gordon and Hannington and
Mackay — to name only a few of the more prominent. Upon
Church affairs at home, besides some of those just mentioned,
there have been the Lives of Bishops Blomfield and S. Wilber-
force, Archbishop Tait and Lord Shaftesbury and Dr. Pusey,
and many others.
A host of miscellaneous books might be mentioned, particu-
larly those on Indian aftairs by Sir John Kaye, Sir B. Temple,
Dr. G. Smith, &c. ; but a complete bibliography would occupy
many pages, and most of the books are tolerably well known
and easily accessible. I ought, however, to refer to the value of
the old volumes of the Christian Ohserver, a leading Evangelical
organ for more than seventy years. Nowhere else can one gather
a more accurate impression of the actual contemporary opinions of
Evano-elical Churchmen. Through the kindness of the Editors
ofthe^Becord and the Guardian, I have also been able to examine
all the files of the former paper, and many of those of the latter,
for the past half-century. Of the llecord, I have turned over
every single page for the past twenty years, and made careful
notes, before writing the brief chapters on recent Church history.
Eeferences are everywhere given at the foot of the page to
the various collateral sources of information. But I have not
ordinarily given references to the Society's Eeports and Maga-
zines, except in some specially important and interesting cases.
They are more frequently given in Vol. III., because the history
of later years, especially of older fields like India, is so con-
densed that the reader- is necessarily referred to the Eeports,
&c., and these later Eeports are generally accessible. It should
be explained that the Annual Eeport is always referred to by
the year of its issue; thus " Eeport of 1895 " means the Eeport
for i894-95. It should also be mentioned that the 3Iemoir of
'Henry Venn used is the "revised and compressed edition" of 1882.
Author's Preface xvii
Here and there I have not hesitated to insert, without definite
indication of the fact, particularly in two or three (jf the
earlier chapters on Africa and Japan, extracts from my own
writings in the CM. Intelligencer, the CM. Atlax, and else-
where. The whole amount of matter thus borrowed is probably
less than half a dozen pages ; but it is right to acknowledge the
fact. It must be further explained that in the small book
entitled One Hundred Yearf^ of the G.M.t<., which was written
after the first two volumes of the History, but before the third
volume, paragraphs and sentences are freijuently taken from the
present work.
b*> I have nut thought it well to interrupt the narrative with
the insertion of ohicial documents and tables of statistics.
There ought properly to be a fourth volume, for appendices
containing lists of missionaries, of institutions, of Bible trans-
lations ; important Minutes of the Committee and other docu-
ments; comparative statistical tables, &c. To prepare this,
however, for the Centenary Year, has been impossible. But
many extracts from official statements and reports occur in
these pages, when they are necessary to make the story com-
plete and are in themselves interesting.
No attempt has been made to secure scientific correctness, or
even absolute uniformity, in tbe spelling of foreign names.
The orthography usually to be found in the C.M.S. publications
of recent years has been adopted. Fur example, the sacred book
of Islam is written Koran, nut, with sume high authorities,
Coran or Quran. The Province of the Five Rivers is called the
Furijah, not Fnnjauh as formerly or FanjAh as more scientifi-
cally curreet. When, of two missionaries who know a certain
town in China well, one spells it Z-l-i/'i and the utlier Tal-chee,
an Englishman unlearned in the Chinese language nifiy be
pardoned for abandoning the attempt to make his spelling of
foreign names acceptable to all experts alike.
This History is not, in the ordinary sense of the word,
" illustrated." But portraits are given of many of the leading
men wdio appear in its pages ; and a very few small illustrations
are placed at the end of certain chapters. There are also repro-
ductions of three old maps of special interest : one, from the
Mi.'isionarn L'egi.ster of 1816, showing the mission stations of the
world at that time ; the second, from the CM. Intelligencer of
1850, Eebmann's first attempt at delineating East Africa ; and
the third, also from the IntelUgenor, Erhardt's famous map of
1850, showing the " monster slug " (as it was called), the sup-
a
xviii Author\^ Preface
posed vast inland sea, which led to the first exploring journey
of Burton and Speke. Many modern maps would be needed to
make the work complete ; but it is hoped that every reader will
have the Church Missioiiarij Atlas open at his side, That
Atlas contains maps of all the Society's Mission-fields, and
information concerning the countries and the people which may
be regarded as preliminary to the study of the History.
I have, in conclusion, to thank very warmly several friends
who have most kindly read the proofs of the work. In the
earlier chapters, the Eev. C. Hole made important suggestions.
The Kev. H. E. Perkins has done so throughout, particularly in
the India chapters. The China chapters have been read by
Archdeacon A. E. Moule ; the New Zealand cha^Tters by the
Bishop of Waiapu ; the North-West Canada chapters by the
Archbishop of Eupert's Land. A large part of the work has
been read by the Rev. Henry Venn (son of the Hon. Secretary)
and the Bev. John Barton ; some chapters by Archdeacon Long,
who was a co-secretary with Mr. Venn ; and others by the Rev.
T. W. Drury and the Rev. I)r, S. Dyson, Principal and Vice-
Principal of Islington College. The chapters on the Church
history at home of the last forty years have been read by the
Rev. Prebendary Barlow, the Rev. Prebendary Webb-Peploe,
and the Rev. Dr. Moule. Although none of these friends, nor
my fellow-secretaries who have also read the proofs, nor the
C.M.S. Committee as a body, are to be held responsible for
the views here and there expressed in these pages, it will be
acknowledged that I have taken the best pains to secure the
general approval of the most competent judges, as well as the
substantial correctness of my statements. I must also thank the
members of the staff of the Editorial Department in the Church
Missionary House for important help cheerfully rendered
in various ways ; and, in particular, Mr. John Alt Porter, for
many valuable corrections and emendations, and for the very
complete Index at the end of the Third Volume.
I respectfully thank his Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury
■ — to whose ardent advocacy the cause of the Evangelization of
the World is so deeply indebted — for permission, cordially
given, to dedicate the work to him ; and also the President of
the Society, Sir John H. Kennaway, Bart., M.P., for the Preface
he has kindly written.
Finally, I commit the book to Him who alone can make it
helpful and useful in the promotion of His holy cause.
E. S.
Chukch Missionary House,
February 1st, 1899.
OUTLINE OF THE WORK.
Thk History is di\iilo;l into Tuii P.irts. Five of tliusu are in Vol. I.,
tvv(j in Vol. II., and three in Vol. III. The Nine Parts after the first
eover Nine Periods of unetjual length. In each Part after the first three,
the Society's environment and history at home are reviewed in the
earlier chapters, and then the Mission-fields in turn, concluding in some
cases with a winding-up chaptei'.
VOL. I.
Part I. is preliminary. First, the Lord's Great Commission to His
Church is recalled. Then in Chaps, ii. and iii. a rapid sketch is given
of the work of the Church in executing that Commission during eighteen
centuries. Primitive Missions, Medieeval Missions, Roman Missions,
and Modern Protestant Missions, are glanced at. In particular, the
establishment and early enterprises of the S.P.C.K. and S.P.G. are
briefly noticed. We are thus brought on towards the close of the
Eighteenth Century, the period which saw the foundation of the C.M.S.
and several other missionary organizations.
Part II. is entitled "One Hundred Years Ago"; but it looks back
over sixty years of the Eighteenth Century, and brings us down to the
thirteenth year of the Nineteenth Century. It is essential to a right under-
standing of the origin and early years of the Church Missionar}' Society
that the condition of the Church of England in the Eighteenth Centurj'
should be realized. Chap, iv., therefore, sketches its leading features,
and notices both the earlier Methodist Revival and the later Evangelical
Circle within the Church ; distinguishing, as it is important to do, the
first generation of Evangelicals, among whom Henry Venn of Hudders-
tield was a leading figure, and the second generation of Evangelicals, of
whom his son John Venn of Clapham was a leader. Then in Chap. v.
we turn aside to view the condition of " Africa and the East " when the
Society was founded, bringing the narrative of Wilberforcc's efforts
down to the year 1800. Chap. vi. concentrates our attention on the
events, especially in 1786, which led to the Missionary Awakening, and
introduces us to the Eclectic Society and its discussions. Chaps, vii.
and VIII. tell the story of the actual establishment of the Society and
the going forth of the first missionaries. In Chap. ix. we resume the
review of African and Indian affairs, and rejoice with Wilberforce over
both the Abolition of the Slave Trade and the Opening of India to the
Gospel mider the Charter of I8I0.
a 2
XX Outline of the Work
Part III. is entitled "A Period of Development." The Society emerges
from its feeble infancy and moves forward with the vigour of youth.
Chap. X. describes a host of "forward steps" that mai-ked the years
1812-18. Chap. XI. tells the story of the first Provincial Associations
and Deputations. In Chap. xii. we turn aside to notice other Societies,
both their work and progress and their relations with the C.M.S. In
particular we see the very curious circumstances of the revival and
expansion of the S.P.G. in 1818. The next five chapters take us into
the Mission-field, and we read of the early trials and successes in West
Africa (xiii.), the deaths of faithful labourers there (xiii., xiv.) ; the
commencement of work in North and South India (xv.), and in New
Zealand, Ceylon, &c. (xvi.) ; the Society's plans and eflorts for the
revival of the ancient Eastern Churches (xvii.), both ia the Turkish
Empire (as it was then) and in Travancore. Chap, xviii., from the
standpoint of 1824, the date of Josiah Pratfs retirement from the
Secretaryship, surveys the position and prosj)ects of the work at home
and abroad, and shows how hard experience had moderated the sanguine
expectations of the early leaders of Missions.
Part IV. only contains six chapters, but they are long and important
ones. The first two are devoted to home aftairs. Chap. xix. introduces
to us the Personnel of the Society, the Secretaries and Committee-men,
the Preachers and Speakers at the Anniversaries, the Candidates and
Missionaries, and those friends and fellow-workers who died in the
period. Chap. xx. shows us the Society's Environment during the
Period, particularly dwelling on the state and progress of the Church
of England, with especial reference to the relations of the Evangelical
school or party to other schools and parties. In this chapter we see
something of the condition of England when Queen Victoria ascended
the throne, the great improvements within the Church, certain internal
differences among Evangelicals, and the rise of the Tractarian or Oxford
Movement. The other four chapters take us again to the Mission-field.
India absorbs two of them. Chap. xxi. is an important chapter, parallel
to the " Environment " chapters at home. It notices the changes and
development i in India in the pei-iod of the 'thirties, particularly the
reforms of Lord W. Bentinck ; also the episcopate of Daniel Wilson,
and his struggle with Caste ; also the advent of Alexander Dufl' and
the commencement of Educational Missions under his auspices. Then
Chap. XXII. turns our attention to the C.M.S. Missions, and takes a
survey of them all round India, with a glance at the work of other
Societies, and at Ceylon. Chap, xxiii. carries us back to Sierra Leone,
and then across the Atlantic to the West Indies, telling the painful
story of Slavery there and of Buxton's successful attack upon it. All
the other Missions are grouped together in Cha]). xxiv., — Mediterranean,
New Zealand, and Rupert's Land, and the short-lived attempts at work
in Abyssinia, and in Zululand, and among the Australian Blacks.
Part V. is the shortest in regard to the length of time covered,
comprising barely eight years, from the spring of 18-41 to the Jubilee
Commemoration, November, 1848, though in one or two chapters the
OuTLr.YE OF TflF. WoRK
XXI
narrative is necessarily continued a little beyond that epoch. The first
chapter, xxv., conilnnes the Porsonnel and the Environment, introducinp-
us to the new Secretary, Henry Venn, and his fellow-workers, and also
noticing various controversies at home, and Missions, Protestant and
Roman, abroad. It is supplemented by two chapters which take up definite
sn})jects, and in doing so show us more of both the lWso7incl and the
Environment. Chap. xxvi. describes the relations at the time between
the C.M.S. and the Chui'ch, and relates the adluision to the Society of
the Archbishops and Bishops, the attitude towards it of men like Blom-
field and S. Wilberforco, and its attitude towards the rising Tractariauism.
Chap, xxvii. tells the story of the Colonial and Missionary Episcopate,
and, in particular, of the establishment of the Colonial Bishoprics Fund,
of the New Zealand Bishopric, and of the Anglican Bishopric in Jeru-
salem ; also of the Society's controversy with Bishop D. Wilson. Then
follow three chapters on the Missions. Inilia is omitted in this Part, the
history of the work tliei*e in the 'forties having been practically covered
in the preceding Part. Chap, xxviii. gives a full narrative of the events
and controversies of the period in New Zealand, with special reference to
Bishop Selwyn and Sir G. Grey. Chap. xxix. comprises several interest-
ing episodes in the history of Missions in Africa, the story of Crowther,
the first Niger Expedition, the origin of the Yoruba Mission, and Krapfs
commencement on the East Coast. Chap. xxx. takes us for the first time
to China, and sunmiarizes the events before and after the first Chinese
War. The last two chapters are special ones. Chap. xxxr. reviews the
Finances of the Society, the Contributions and the Expenditure, during
the half-century. Chap, xxxii. describes the Jubilee Commemoration.
VOL. II.
The two Parts comprised in Vol. II. cover twenty-four years, 1840 to
1872. It would have been better to divide this period into three Parts,
of about eight years each. As it is, the Parts are too long and full, and
the chapters overlap more than is desirable. For example, the reader
will find himself in the Revival period of 18G0 at home before he comes
to events abroad ten years older; and Dr. Pfander's later work at
Constantinople has to be taken before his earlier work in India. But
there need be no confusion if the dates are carefull}' noted.
The first two chapters of Part VI. deal with the Environment. Many
of the events recorded in Chap, xxxiii., the Gorham Judgment, the
Revival of Convocation, itc., are the commonplaces of modern Church
Histories ; but those of Chap, xxxiv., the new Evangelical Movements
and their effect upon the Church, although equally important, are
generally ignored. Chap. xxxv. introduces the Personnel, as in previous
Parts. Chaps, xxxvi. and xxxvii. also introduce persons — the candidates
from the Universities, and the Islington men — with many biographical
details. Then, in turning to the Missions, we take New Zealand first
(xxxYiii.), because we have to review Bishop Selwyn's plans for Church
xxii Outline of the Work
organization and the resulting controversies, thus continuing certain
discussions in Chap, xxxiii., the first in this Part.
The rest of the Part, comprising twelve chapters, is devoted to the
Mission-field. Chap, xxxix., on West Africa, touches such matters as
the interest taken by the Queen and Lord Palmerston in African affairs,
the eftbrts of H. Venn to promote industry and commerce, and the brief
episcopates and deaths of the first three Bishops of Sierra Leone.
Chap. XL. introduces the story of East African exploration ; and
Chap. XLi. the " proselytism " controversy regarding Bishop Gobat, and
the British relations with Turkey after the Crimean War. Chap. xlix.
also touches political matters, in reference to China, the T'aip'ing
Rebellion, and the Opium Controversy ; but Chaps, xlviii. and l., on
Ceylon and North-West America, are purely missionary.
But the six chapters on India, taken together, form one of the most
important sections of the whole History, including the great epoch of
Dalhousie's Govei'nor-Generalship (xlii.), the conquest of the Punjab
(xLiv.), the Mutiny (xlv.), the Neutrality Controversy in both India
and England (xlv., xlvi.) ; with the remarkable development of INlissions
during the period, both in the North and in the South, especially in
Tinnevelly and Travancore (xLiii.) ; the work of Pfander and French at
Agra (xLii.), of Noble at Masulipatam (xLiii.), of Leupolt and Long in
the North (xlvii.) ; and above all, the thrilling story of the commence-
ment in the Punjab and on the Afghan Frontier (xliv.) under the auspices
of the Lawrences, Edwardes, Montgomery, and others.
Part VII., like Part VI., would have been better if a somewhat shorter
period had been included in it. The fact, little known but very im-
portant, that the years 1865-72 were a time, not oidy of depression, but
actually of retrogression, would have come out more clearly. Let it be
emphasized here, however, that in 1872 the Society had actually twelve
men /cs.s on the roll than in 180''3. The careful reader will find why it
was so.
The first two chapters of this Part also are devoted to the Environ-
ment. The " High " and " Low " movements are not taken separately,
however, as they were in Part VI. One chapter is occupied with the
controversies of the period, and the other with Church affairs and some
Home Mission developments. Then Chaps. Liii. and Liv. give us, as ni
previous parts, the ^jf'/'.sowMc/ and inner history of the Society; the account
of the candidates in Chap. liv. leading up to the establishment of the
Day of Intercession.
Chap. LV., on Native Church Organization, is complementary to
Chap, xxxviii. in the preceding Part. The next twelve chapters again
take lis round the Mission-field. First, West Africa, telling, on the one
hand, of the discouragements and repulses everywhere (lvi.), and, on
the other hand, of Bishop Crowther's work on the Niger (lvii.) ; then
Mamitius, and the short-lived Mission in Madagascar (lviii.) ; then
five chapters on India. Of these five, four are arranged neither geo-
graphically nor chronologically, but topically, introducing us to the great
Anglo-Indians of the period (lix.), to the Brahmo Samaj and similar
OCTLINE OF THE WORK Xxiii
movements (ta.), to tlio varied missioiiaiy methods and agencies (lAi.),
and commcmoratinfit the noble missionaries who died in the period
(r,xii.): while the fifth (lxiii.), on tlie Punjab, is notable for its narra-
tives of converts from Islam. Advances and trials in China (lxiv.), the
opening of Japan (lxv.), the establishment of Metlakahtla fLXVi.), follow
in succession; and, lastly, comes a full account (lxvii.) of the dark
period of war in New Zealand.
The last chapter of the Part, Lxviii., winds np the history of the
period with a sketch of Henry Venn's latter days, closing with his death.
VOL. TTT.
Part VIII. covers the eight years of Henry Wright's Secretaryship, bnt
carries on the history two years after his death, partly that the great
epoch of change in Salisbury Square, 18l~!0-82, may clearly ajipear, and
partly to mark the epoch in Engli.sh (-hin-ch history of Archbishop Tait's
death at the end of 1882.
We begin, as before, by snrveying the Environment, first the Church
Movements and leading men of the period (lxix.), and then (lxx.)
the Evangelistic and Spiritual Movements associated with the names of
Aitken, Moody, Pennefather, Battersby, &c. Then we come to the
Society itself, and note the men and work of these energetic years
(lxxi.) ; stopping, however, just before Mr. Wright's death, and
leaving that event and its issues to come at the end of the Part. A
supplementary chapter (lxxii.) describes the Society's home organiza-
tion.
The chapters on the Missions are eleven in mnnber. First Ave see
the revival of vigorous efforts in and for Africa (lxx in.), mostly con-
sequent on the death of Livingstone; and, in particular (lxxiv.), the
commencement in Uganda. Then we take np Missions to Moham-
medans (lxxv.) in Palestine, Persia, &c. India absoibs four chapters
this time, three of them reviewing the work by dioceses. First, Calcutta
and Bombay (lxxvi.), inti'oducing the Prince of Wales's visit, Vaughan's
struggle with Caste in Krishnagar, and some educational questions :
then Lahore (lxxvii.), and the work of French, Clark, Bateman, and
Gordon ; and then Madras (lxxviii.), with Bishops Sargent and Cald-
well in Tinnevelly, the Great Famine, the Travancore Revival and
Schism, itc. The fourth Indian chapter (lxxix.) naiTates the efforts to
influence the non-Aryan Hill Tribes, Santals, Gonds, &c. Chap, i.xxx.
discusses the ecclesiastical questions that arose in both India and Cejdon
at this time, and, in particidar, tells the story of the famous Ceylon Con-
troversy. The China chapter (lxxxi.) tells of development and advance
amid many difficnlties ; and a short section at the end of it summai'izes
the few yet important incidents of the period in Japan. Chap. Lxxxii.
takes us back to North America, reviews the work by dioceses, and, at
the end, begins the story of Bishop Ridley's episcopate on the North
Pacific coast.
The closing chapter of the Part (i.xxxiii.), as above indicated, relates
xxiv Outline of the Work
the important events of 1880-82, Mr. Wright's death, the changes in the
Church Missionary House that followed, and the emergence of the
Society from the Period of Ketrenchment into the Peiiod of Expansion.
Part IX. is devoted to the period of Mr. Wigram's Secretaryship,
except that the events of his first two years, 1881-2, have been mostly
included in Part VIII. The Home Chapters are relatively fuller in this
Part than in any other, the Period having been marked by so many new
developments. Commencing with the Environment as usual. Chapter
Lxxxiv. introduces us to Archbishop Benson's Primacy and many of
the events that occurred in its earlier years; also to the rise of the
modern missionary movements at Cambridge and in connexion with the
Keswick Convention. In Chap, lxxxv. the Fersonneloi the Society during
the period is described, and the incidents are noticed which made 1883-4
the commencement of a new era of progress. Chap. lxxXVi. is entirely
devoted to the " three memorable years " that followed, 1 885-7, dwelling
on their encouraging features, while Chap, lxxxvii. notices various
internal controversies of the period, touching the Jerusalem bishopric,
&c., and also the attacks of Canon Isaac Taylor and others. In Cliap.
Lxxxviii. the numerous missionary recruits of the period are introduced.
Then, turning to the foreign field, we have three long and full chapters
on African aftairs. The first two are entitled " High Hopes and Sore
Sorrows " : Chap, lxxxix. relating the developments, difllculties, and
deaths in the West Africa Missions, particularly on the Niger ; and
Chap. xc. the advances and the trials of the period in East Africa and
Uganda. Chap. xci. continues the latter story, with especial reference
to the steps which led to the establishment of the Uganda Protectorate.
The following seven chapters, xcii. to xcviii., take us in succession to
India, Ceylon, Mauritius, and New Zealand ; to Persia, Palestine, and
Egypt ; to China and Japan ; and to the Dominion of Canada.
Finally, Chaps, xcix. and c. resume the Home narrative, reviewing
the proceedings of various Conferences and Congresses held during the
period, and the incidents of seven years, 1888-94, showing the results of
the Policy of Faith.
Part X., in six closing chapters, reviews the events of the past four
years, and seeks to draw from the whole history lessons for our guidance
and encouragement in the time to come. Chaps, ci. and cii. are devoted
to Home affairs ; Chaps, cm. and civ. to Africa and Asia respectively ;
Chap. cv. to brief obituary notices ; and Chap. cvi. looks back, around,
and forward, in final and farewell survey.
CONTENTS OF VOL. I.
PAGE
Outline of the Wouk xix
PRELIMINARY CHAPTERS.
CHAPTER I.
The Great Com;\iissiox 3
CHAPTER II.
Missions before the Reformation.
The Apostolic As^o — Conversion of the Roinaii Empire — of the
Northern Nations — Patrick, Anschar, Rayimnid Lnll, i^-c. —
Nestorian Missions in Asia — Mohammedanism . . . . (i
CHAPTER III.
Missions after the Reformation.
Roman Missions — Francis Xavier — Early Protestant Efforts — Eliot
and the Red Indians — Cromwell, Robert Boyle, Dr. liray —
S.P.C.K. and S.P.G. — Bishop Berkeley — Ziegenbali;' and
Schwartz — Hans Egede — The Moravians — Brainerd . . . IG
3Part M.
ONE HUNDRED YEARS AGO.
CHAPTER IV.
The Eighteenth Century and the Evangelical Revival.
The Chnrch nnder the Georges — Butler and Wesley — The
Methodist Movement — Wesleyans, Calvinists, Evangelicals —
The Last Decade — Second Generation of Evangelicals — The
Clapham Sect . ol
CHAPTER V.
Africa and the East — Waiting.
The Dark Continent — England and the Slave Trade — Granville
Sharp, Clarkson, Wilberforce — 'l"he Struggle for Abolition —
The East India Company — Religion in British India in the
Eighteenth Century — Chai-les C!rant and Wilberforce — The
Dark Period in India — Other Eastern Lands, Waiting . . 45
XX vi Contents
CHAPTER VI.
The Missionary Awakening.
The Twelve Events of ] 786 — Charles Simeon — Carey — The
Baptist and London Missionary Societies — The Eclectic Dis-
cussions— Botany Bay — Simeon in earnest — Josiah Pratt and
John Venn — Why form a new Society ? — L M.S. not desirable,
S.P.G. not possible
CHAPTER VTI.
The New Society and its Early Struggles.
April 12th, 1799— The Men and their Plans— Waiting for the
Archbishop — Men, Money, and Openings wanted — The First
Five Sermons — Thomas Scott and Josiah Pratt ... 68
CHAPTER VIII.
The First Missionaries.
Henry Martyn's Offer— The Men from Berlin— Their Training—
The First Valedictory Meetings— The First Voyages Out— the
First Englishmen accepted — Ordination Difficulties . . .81
CHAPTER IX.
Africa and India: Struggle and Victory.
Renewed Anti-Slave-Trade Campaign — Wilberforce's Triumph —
Sierra Leone — India in the Dark Peidod — Carey and Seram-
pore — Claudius Buchanan — The Vellore Mutiny — Controversy
at Home — The Charter Debates — Another Victory — India
Open ............ U:3
A PERIOD OF DEVELOPMENT: 1812—1824.
CHAPTER X.
Forward Steps.
Signs and Causes of Coming Developriient — The President — New
Rules— Salisbury Square — Ainiual Meetings and Sermons —
Valedictory Meetings — Public Affairs: Fall of Napoleon:
State of the Country — More Openings for Work — Transla-
tional Undertakings — Samuel Lee — Offers of Service — Special
Funds — The Missionary Register . . . • . . . 107
CHAPTER XL
Rousing the Country : the Associations.
Growing Needs — Plans for Associations — The Start at Bristol —
Basil Woodd's Yorkshire Journey — Featiu-es of the Campaign : ,
Obstacles, Opposition within and without the Chiu-ch, Suc-
cesses, Spiritual Influence, Hymns — Norwich, Cambridge,
Liverpool, Ireland- -Grandfathers of the Present Generation . 129
CHAPTER XII.
C.M.S. and Other Societies.
The S.P.C.K. and S.P.G. at this Period— The Archdeacon of Bath's
Attack on C.M.S. — Awakening in S.P.G. : the Royal Letter
• — Pratt's Propayanda — Heber proposes union of S.P.G. and
CoXTFXrS XX vu
I'AOK
C.M.S.— The Bible Society. Jews' Society, Prayer Bix.k and
Homily Society, Religious Tract Society, Nonconformist
Missionary Societies — Fomulation <>f tlif American Churcli
Missions . . • • • • .14*
CHAPTER XITT.
SiETiRA Leone : The White Mans Urave; The Black Mans Like.
Earlv Efforts— The Snsn Mission— Edward Bickersteth's Visit—
Work amonu the Liberated Slaves— "W. A. B. Johnstm and
H. Diirino— The Revival at Regent— The Fever and its Victims
—West Africa not a Debtor but a Creditor .... l-"<i
CHAPTER XIV.
The Finlshed Course.
Miss Childe's Book— Some Martyrs for Christ in AVest Africa-
Rev. W. Garnon— Cates— A Negro's Wail— Mr. and Mrs.
Palmer— C. Knight and H. Brooks Xyliiiulers Daughters -
Kissy Churcliyard 1 ' •"'
CHAPTER XV.
India : Entering the Opened Door.
C.M.S. Work begun before the Opening -The Calcutta Corre-
sponding Committee— Corrie and Abdul Masih— The First
Missionaries— The Bishopric of Calcutta— liishop Middleton
— Bishop's College — Bishop Helper— Burdwan and its Schools
—Miss Cooke's Girls' School— Benares, Agra, Meirnt— The
Sepoy Convert— Madras and Tinnevelly— Hough and Rhenius 182
CHAPTER XVI.
Insular Missions : New Zealand, Ceylon, West Indies. Malta.
Samuel Marsden and the Maoris— The New Zealand Mission—
Chri.stmas Day, IS 14— The Lay Settlers— Trials and Di.s-
appointments— Henry and William Williams -The Openings
in Ceylon and the First Missicmaries — Antigun, Barbadops.
Honduras— Malta as a Centre of Influence .... 20-3
CHAPTER XVII.
Tni: EAsTi;r>x Churches: Efforts for their Revival.
The Connuittee's Eyes upon the East— An Appeal from Malta —
William Jowett— C.M.S. Policy with the Eastern Churches—
The Bible for the Eastern Churches— Promising Beginnings
— Tiukish Atiocities— The Syrian Church of Travancore —
Buchanan and Colonel Mimro" C.M.S. Designs— Fenn, Bailey,
Baker --1
CHAPTER XVTTI.
The Outlook after Twenty-five Years.
Josiah Pratt retires— Sombi-e Tone of his Last Rei)ort— Cunning-
ham on the Great Enemy— Discoiuagement and Repulse in
the Mission Field— Deaths— New Friends— The Anniversaries
—Men and Means- Ordinations -New N.-W. America Mission
— The S.V.:M.U. Motto anticipated- The One Hoi)e. an Out-
pouring of the Spirit --j^j
xxviii Contents
FROM PRATT'S RETIREMENT TO VENN'S ACCESSION:
1824— 1841.
CHAPTER XIX.
The Personnel of the Period. page
Dandeson Coates — Edward Bickersteth — The Committee — Lord
Chichester President — Tlie two Bishops Smiiner — The
Preachers and Speakers — B. Noel and Dale suggest " Own
Missionaries" — The Missionaries — The CM. College — Deaths
— Simeon and Wilberforce 2-">l
CHAPTER XX.
The Environment of the Period.
Pulilic Affairs — The Reform Bill and the Bishops — Accession of
Queen Victoria — Church Reform — Evangelical Improvements
—The C.P.A.S.— Growth of S.P.G.— Bishop Blomfield— Open-
ing of Exeter Hall — Bible Society Controversies — Prayer at
Public Meetings — Calvinistic Disputes — Edward Irving —
Plymouth Brethren — Prophetical Studies — Pratt warns
against Disunion — The Tractarian Movement : Keble and
Newniian — Attitude of the Evangelicals ; and of C.M.S. . . 270
CHAPTER XXI.
India : Changes and Developments.
The Bishops — Daniel Wilson — Lord W. Bentinck — Social Reforms
— Abolition of Suttee — Government Patronage of Idolatry —
Charles Grant the Younger and the Company — Resignation
of Sir P. Maitland— Work and Influence of R. M. Bird-
Steam Communication — New Bishoprics — Bishop Corrie —
Bishop W^ilson and the Caste Question — Education — Alexander
Dufl"; his Father and C. Simeon — Duft"s Plan — Ram Mohun
Roy — Duff's College— The Early Converts — Duff and Macaulay
— The Friend of India and Calcutta lieview — Duff at home —
His C.M.S. Speech . . . .- 290
CHAPTER XXII.
India : Progress of the Missions.
The North India Stations — The Awakening in Krishnagar — Bishop
Wilson's Hopes — Why they failed — Bishop Wilson declines
Ladies — Mrs. Wilson — Bombay — Tinnevelly — Rhenius : his
Work, his Disconnexion — Progress under Pettitt — The Tinne-
velly Christians : Nominal Christianity ; Persecution ; C.M.S.
and S.P.G. — Travancore : Syrians and Heathen ; Changed
Policy of the Mission — Madras Seminary — Telugu Mission :
Fox and Noble — John Tucker — Controversies with the Corre-
sponding Committees — Bishop's College — Other Missions in
India— Ceylon . 312
CHAPTER XXIII.
The Negro on Both Sides the Atlantic, Enslaved and Free.
Continued Slave Trade in West Africa — Sickness and Sorrow at
Sierra Leone — Progress notwithstanding — Can the Negro be
Contents xxix
PAGE
elevated ?— West Indian Slavery — Wilberforce and Buxton —
The Parliamentary Campaign — West Indian Cruelties— Perse-
cution of Missionaries — Trial and Death of John Smith —
Oppression of Negroes in Jamaiea — An Amendment at
Exeter Hall—Abolition of Slavery — Death of AVilberforce —
•' Compensation for the Slave "—The Day of Emaneipation —
iSIissionary Plans for the Negroes — C.M.S. in Jamaiea —
British Guiana Mission — Zachary Macaulay .... 333
CHAPTER XXIV.
Greek, Copt, Abyssinian, Zulu, Maori, Australian, Cree.
Malta, Syra, Smyrna— Egypt and Abyssinia : S. Gobat ; Lieder ;
Isenberg and Krapf — The Zulu Mission : Franeis Owen — New
Zealand: First Baptisms; New Missionaries; Extension;
Charles Darwin ; Bishop Broughton ; Marsden's Last Visit
and Death — New Holland Mission : the Australian lilacks —
Rupert's Land : the Cree and the Soto ; Cockran and Cowley ;
Bishop Mountain's Visit 349
FROM VENN'S ACCESSION TO THE JUBILEE: 184 1— 1848.
CHAPTER XXV.
Henry Venn ; and Survey of Men and Things.
The Year 1841 an Epoch in Church, in State, in C. M.S.— Henry
Yeiiii— Deaths of Pratt and Coates — The Committee, Vice-
Presidents, Preachers and Speakers— C.M.S. Missions and
Missionaries — Missions of Other Societies— Roman Missions
—Controversies at Home : Maynooth, Irish Church Missions,
Evangelical Alliance— Scotch Disruption— C.M.S. and Scotch
Episcopal Church 367
CHAPTER XXVI.
The Society and the Church.
Improved Condition of the Church — Church Unions— H. Venn's
Defence of C.M.S.— " Sanction of Convocation "—F. Close's
Sermon — Bishop Blomtield's Proposals for C.M.S. and S.P.G.
— F. Close and Lord Chichester on the Proposals — Revision
of C.M.S. Laws— Archbislu.ps and Bisho^is join C.M.S.— Hugh
Stowell's Sermon, and Bishop Blomtield's— Results, Ex2)ected
and Actual — S.P.G. and C.M.S. — Samuel Wilberforce, Bishop
of Oxford: his Career and Intiuence — J. B. Sumner, Arch-
bishop of Canterbury — Tractarian Controversies and Seces-
sions— Attitude of C.M.S 382
CHAPTER XXVII.
The Colonial and Missionary Episcopate.
S.P.G. Appeals in Eighteenth Century — First Bishops for America
and Canada — The Colonial Episcopate at Queen Victoria's
Accession— Growth of S.P.G. — The Colonial Church Society —
The Colonial Bishoprics Fund, 1841 — Attitude of C.M.S. —
New Zealand Bishopric— C.M.S. Relation thereto— Bishop
Selwyn— Stowell's Sermon— Other new Bishoprics— Jerusalem
XXX Contents
PAGE
Bishopric — Bunsun, Lord Ashley, Gladstone — The first Bishop
consecrated — C.M.S. Controversy with Bishop Daniel Wilson
—The Concordat and H. Venn — Case of Mr. Humphrey —
Bishop D. Wilson's Visit to England -His C.M.S. Sermon . 401
CHAPTER XXVIII.
New Zealand: the Bishop, the Colonv, and the Mission.
Advent of Colonists — Annexation of New Zealand — Arrival of
Bishop Selvvyn : his Testimony, Travels, and Trials — His
Difficulties with C.M.S. — His Tardy Ordinations — Colonial
Encroachment and Maori Discontent — Governors Fitzroy and
Grey — The Missionary Lands Question — Grey's Secret Des-
patch— Archdeacon H. Williams disconnected and reinstated
— The Maori Bible — Romanist Mission — Extension and Suc-
cesses of C.M.S. Mission — Sir G. Grey's Testimony — The
Melanesian Mission ....... ^. . 4i'7
CHAPTER XXIX.
New Enteki'uises in Africa : Niger Expedition, Yoruba Mission
East Coast.
Story of Adjai the Slave-hoy — Powell Buxton's New Plans — The
River Niger — Prince Albert's First Speech — The Expedition
of 1841 — Its Failure and Fruits — Buxton's Death — The
returning Egba Exiles — S. Crowther's Ordination — 'i'ownsend
and Crowther to Abeokuta — Krapf in Shoa — His Voyage
to Zanzibar — Mombasa — Death of Mrs. Krapf — The Appeal
of her Grave .......... 449
CHAPTER XXX.
The Opening of China.
Nestorian and Roman Missions in China — China in the First
Report of C.M.S.— Morrison, Milne, Gutzlaff— E. B. Squire's
Attempt — The Chinese War — Lord Ashley and the Opium
Trade— New Moves Forward— Vincent Stanton— The C.M.S.
Mission — The First Missionaries — Bishop George Smith . . 463
CHAPTER XXXI.
The Society's Finances.
Earliest Contributions — The Associations in 1820 — London and
the Provinces in 1848— Comparison with the Present Time —
A Missionary-box at Sea — The Expenditure of the Half-
Century- The Financial Crisis of 1841 — Plans of the Special
Committee — What are the " Talents " given to a Society ?
— An Income Tax for C.M.S. — An Appeal on Protestant
Principles — Its Results . . . . , . . .47-5
CHAPTER XXXII.
The Jubilee.
Europe and England in 1848 — Survey of the Half-Century's
Work — Jubilee Tracts — Jubilee Services and Gatherings —
The Great Meeting : Lord Chichester, Sir R. Inglis, Bishop
Wilberforce, Cunningham, Bickersteth, Hoare — Observances
in the Provinces and in the Mission Field — Death of H. W.
Fox — The Fox Sermon at Rugby — The Jubilee Fund — The
Queen becomes a Life Governor — Fox's Jubilee Hymn . . 480
PAGE
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
VOL. T.
PoUTKAlTS : —
Tlio Ri^lit HdimuiaMu tlio VauI of Cliielu'stur . . I')-()//lisj)iece
Thomas Clarksou, Zacliury Maeaulay, "NVilliain 'Willji-r-
foi'ce, John Bacon, Homy Tliointon . . . Facini/ 31
The Revs. John Veiui, Thomas Scott, Charles Simeon,
John Newton, Richard Cecil ..... „ 57
Cliarles Grant, the Revs. Heniy Martyn, Abdul Masih,
Claudius Buchanan, Daniel Corrie ... „ 02
Lord Gambier, the Revs. Basil Woodd, Josiah Pratt,
William Goode, T. T. Biddulph .... ,,107
he Revs. John AV. Cmniingham, AVilliani Jowelt,
and Kdward ]iick(!rsteth ; Bishop Ryder ; Sir T.
Fowell Buxton ....... „ 2ol
Bishop Heber, Dr. Alexander Dull, Bishop Daniel
Wilson, Bishop Cotton, the Revs. J. J. Weitbrecht
and Benjamin Bailey ...... „ 290
The Revs. Hugh McNeile and Hugh Stowell, Arch-
bishop Sumner, Dean Close, Bishop Samuel Wil-
berforce ......... „ 382
Archdeacon Hemy Williams, the Rev. Sanuiel
Marsden, Bishop G. A. Selwyn, Bishop W.
Williams, Mrs. W. Williams „ -J27
Behaim's Globe, 1492 28
The Study in St Anne's Rectory, in which the lirst Com-
mittee Meetings were held ...... 80
Facsimile of Map and accompanying Notes as inserted in
the Missivnary lic(/isier for 1810 ..... „ 128
The First Picture in a Missionary Magazine, the Missionari/
J^cc/ktcr of April, 181(i, representing a Scene in West
Afl-ica ' . . . . 128
Waiiv of tlio portraits in the History are from oil-paintings or enjiravings
presented to tlic Society ; others from photographs or prints kindly lent
by friends, for which the Author here makes grateful acknowledgment.
PBELTMTNAEY CHAPTERS.
VOL. I.
NOTE ON PART I.
The Three Chapters in this Part are preliminary. First, the Lord's
Grtat Commission to His Church is recalled. Then in Chaps. IT. and III.
a rapid sketch is given of the work of the Chmx-h in executing that
Commission during eighteen centuries. Primitive Missions, Medireval
Missions, Roman Missions, and Modern Protestant Missions, are glanced
at. In particular, the establishment and early enterprises of the S.P.C.K.
and S.P.G. are briefly noticed. We are thus brought on towards the
close of the Eighteenth Century, the period which saw the foundation
of the C.M.S. and several other missionary organizations.
CHAPTER I.
The Great Commission.
" Remember the tcords of the Lord Jesus." — Acts xx. 35.
HE History of Missions begins with the Day of Pente- Part I.
cost. Our familiar Creed, after affirming the facts of Chap. 1.
the Incarnation, Sufferings, Death, Burial, and Resur-
rection of the Son of God, continues, " He ascended The Voice
into heaven ; And sitteth on the right hand of God c^reed.
the Father Almighty : From thence He shall come to judge the
quick and the dead." The Past — "He ascended into heaven."
The Future— " From thence He shall come." Between the Past
and the Future is the Present—" He sitteth at the right hand of
God." But what of the Present on earth ? The Creed goes on,
"I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Holy Cathohc Church."
While the Son of God is sitting on the Father's right hand, it is
the dispensation of the Holy Ghost ; and the work He is doing is
the calling out of the Ecclesia, the "Holy Catholic Church."
That is the purpose of Missions ; and so the History of Missions
begins with the Day of Pentecost.
One of the first parts of the work of the Holy Ghost was to The Voice
inspire the writers of the New Testament. The Four Evangelists Tel'JImenT.
were guided by Him to write their records of the Life of the Son
of God on earth. When we examine these precious records,
nothing is more significant than the brevity of the accounts of
His visits to His disciples after the Resurrection. The narratives
of the Sufterings and Death are full and detailed. The narratives
of the Resurrection and the Forty Days are short and slight. St.
Luke tells us in his second work, the Acts of the Apostles, that
Christ, during those Forty Days, " gave commandments unto the
apostles whom He had chosen," and that He spoke to them " of
the things pertaining to the Kingdom of God." The same evange-
list, in his Gospel, shows us the Lord expounding to them the
ancient Scriptures, the things " written in the Law of Moses, and
in the Prophets, and in the Psalms." Now the interesting
question is. Out of all these instructions and exhortations and
expositions, what were the Evangelists guided by the Holy Ghost
to record? The answer is most significant.
St. Matthew gives us only one fragment. It is this: — " All in st.
power is given unto Me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, '^''"h^^-
B 2
4 The Great Commission
Part I. and teach [disciple] all nations, baptizing them in the name of
Chap. 1. the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost : teaching
them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you :
and lo, I am v^ith you alway, even unto the end of the world."
St. Mark. St. Mark — i.e. the postscript to His Gospel : into the textual
question we need not enter — gives us only one fragment. It is
this : — " Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every
creature," with the appended promise to him that believes and
warning to him that believes not, and the reiterated insistence
upon baptism as the public confession of Christ* and sign of
separation unto Him.
St. Luke. St. Luke gives us the episode of the Walk to Emmaus ; but in
the narrative of the Lord's intei'view with His disciples as a body,
there is again only one fragment of His instructions. In that
fragment He lays definite stress upon three things. " Thus it is
written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the
dead the third day, and that repentance and remission of sins
should be preached in His name among all nations, beginning at
Jerusalem." Three things put on a level, as apparently of equal
importance in the work of redemption, viz., (1) the Death of
Christ, (2) His Eesurrection, (3) the preaching of repentance and
remission of sins among all nations.
St. John. gt John records the Lord's first appearance to the disciples on
that first Easter-Day evening, when, after the word of salutation,
"Peace," He instantly gives them, as the one thing of transcen-
dent importance, their commission, " As My Father hath sent Me,
even so send I you." It is interesting to notice further that, in
the last and supplementary chapter of the Gospel, we have their
work represented under two figures. First, we see them as
fishers : " Cast the net on the right side of the ship, and ye shall
find." Secondly, as shepherds (for the injunctions to Peter
cannot be regarded as merely personal to himself): "Feed My
lambs," "Tend My sheep," "Feed My sheep." Here we have
the two grand divisions of all work for Christ, at home and abroad,
(1) the evangelistic, (2) the pastoral.
So we find that whatever the instructions and exhortations and
expositions of those Forty Days were, and however numerous,
the Evangelists were divinely inspired to record only one Great
Commission, and that this is recorded by them all. There are
but few things in the life and teaching of Christ that have a four-
fold record. We have it of His Sufferings and Death ; we have it
of His Resurrection ; we have it of one Miracle, and one only, the
Feeding of the Five Thousand. We have it not of His Birth, nor
of His Circumcision, nor of His Baptism, nor of His Temptation,
nor of His Transfiguration, nor of His Ascension. The Great
Commission, therefore, occupies an exceptional position in having
a fourfold record.
And not an exceptional position merely. Its position is i;nique.
For it actuallv has a fivefold record. We turn to the first chapter of
The Great Commission 5
the Acts. We are there back again in the Forty Days. But there, Part I.
too, only one thing is definitely mentioned. The disciples come Chap. l.
to the Lord with a speculative question. Instantly, "It is not for thc Acts,
you to know . . . but — " But what? He would not give them
the knowledge they asked for, but He would give them power.
Power for what ? " Ye shall receive power, after that the Holy
GTiost is come upon you ; and ye shall be witnesses unto INIe . . .
unto the uttermost part of the earth." "And when He liad
spoken these things, as they beheld, He was taken up, and a
cloud received Him out of their sight." The very last words of
Jesus : " uttermost part of the earth " !
How could the Holy Ghost have emphasized more strongly
what work was to be done upon earth during the period between
the Ascension and the Second Advent, while the Son of God
" sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty " '?
In a word, that work is the Evangelization of the World. The The World
Evangelization — whatever that word may include ; not necessarily geiized.
the Conversion. Without entering into the difficult questions
clustering round the Promise of the Second Coming, there seem
to be two passages in tlie New Testament which indicate the two
purposes of the present work of Evangelization. The first is
Matt. xxiv. 14, " This Gospel of the kingdom shall be preached
in all the world for a witness unto all nations ; and then shall the
end come." The second is Acts xv. 14, " God did visit the
Gentiles, to take out of them a people for His name." The first
announces the imiversal proclamation of the Gospel ; the second
announces the gathering out of the Ecclesia, " the Holy Catholic
Church."
It is the Divine plan that the Church is to do this work, guided, 5^ ^^f
administered, empowered, l)y the Holy Ghost. The Churcli is to
evangelize the World. The Chm-ch is to gather out the Church.
She is to be self-extending, self-propagating.
It is a humiliating thought that this one great Commission
which the Church's Eisen Lord gave her to execute is the very
thing she has not done. She has accomplished magnificent work.
She has covered Christendom with splendid l)uildings for the
worship of God. She has cared for the poor, the sick, the in-
firm, the aged, the yoimg. Slie has taught the world to build
hospitals and schools. But her Lord's one grand Commission
she has almost entirely neglected. It should have had the first
place in her thoughts, sympathies, and prayers. It has had the
last place, if indeed it can be said to have had a place at all. And
all the while, her Lord and Saviour " sitteth on the right hand of
God the Father Almighty," " exjjectinq," as the Epistle to the
Hebrews expresses it.
But a few of the Church's members, sometimes as individuals,
sometimes in bands and associal .ons, have remembered their
Lord's command and tried to do scncthuKj. The story of one of
these associations is the subject of the present work.
CHAPTER II.
Missions before the Reformation.
Part I.
Chap. 2.
30-1534.
The Acts
a book on
Missions.
Work of
the first
Christians,
The Apostolic Age— Conversion of the Roman Empire— Of the Northern
Nations — Patrick — lona — Augustin of Canterbury — Boniface —
Anschar — Dark Ages — Crusades — Raymund Lull — Nestorian
Missions in Asia — Islam and Christianity.
" Ye did run well ; ivho did hinder you ?" — Gal. v. 7.
EFORE inquiring into the origin of the Society whose
story this book is to tell, and into the circumstances
amid which it was established, let us take a brief
survey of the Church's evangelistic work during the
preceding eighteen centuries.
The Acts of the Apostles is the Book of Evangelization. There
we see the Church commencing the work given her to do, directed
at every step by the Divine Administrator of her Missions, the
Holy Ghost. That book is but a fragment. It gives us only a
few illustrations of what the Apostles and their companions and
followers did towards executing the great Commission. Yet its
value is supreme, and its teachings regarding the conduct of
Missions are most important. Into these we cannot now enter ;
but there is one fact revealed to us in the Acts which throws
much light upon the history of the Church ever since.
It is this. From the very beginning, the work of evangelization
was but partially — we might say feebly — taken up by the Church
as a whole. The pictures sometimes drawn of the early Christians
going forth by thousands in all directions as missionaries are
entirely imaginary. Only once in the Acts is there anything in
the least like this. They that were "scattered abroad" by the
persecution which arose at Jerusalem after the murder of Stephen,
and in which Saul of Tai'sus took so leading a part, " went every-
where preaching the word." But they were fugitives, not mis-
sionaries. They were "all" scattered, ■ men and women and
children ; the scattering was, for the most part, " throughout the
regions of Judaea and Sani.aria," not even so far as Galilee; and
apparently the majority returned to the capital when the perse-
cution M-as over, and formed ft large part of the " thousands of
Jews that believed" w^hom A^e meet with later, and of "the
poor saints which were at Jerusalem." There were some, how-
JfnSlONS BEFORE THE R E FOh\^r AT/OX 7
ever, who went further, who " travelled as far as Phenice and Part T.
Cyprus and Antioch " ; hut they also were fugitives, and not £!^^?„f"
missionaries, and the Church of Antioch is the great typical ex- ' ^J_
ample of God's l)lessing upon the personal and unofficial efforts of
private Christians.
When the Church of Antioch itself, under the direction of the
Holy Ghost, sent forth a Mission to the Heathen, it consisted of
two missionaries and one " minister" or assistant ; and the latter
soon returned home. As this is the only recorded case, we have
no other direct evidence ; but to all appearance the Gospel was
carried to Rome by converted Jews having business or other con-
nexions there, of the type of Aquila and Priscilla. Of the foreign
missionary work of the original Apostles no account is given.
We may accept the traditions that they went in different directions
preaching Christ ; but of extensive evangelization by members of
the Church generally there is little or no trace.
St. Paul's words in the Epistle to the Colossians, "The gospel its results,
which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature "ver*" ^^
which is under heaven " (eV ttuo-?/ ti] KTiVet ttJ vtto toi/ ovpavuv), have stated,
been much misunderstood. It is obvious that they cannot, as they
stand in our Authorized Version, be taken literally. No one
supposes that, at the time of St. Paul's first imprisonment at
Rome, every Pict and Scot in North Britain, every Teuton in the
German forests, every Scythian and Parthian and Chinaman, had
heard the Gospel. The Revised Version is, "Preached in all
creation under heaven"; and Bishop Barry, in his note on the
passage,''' well says, " In idea and capacity the Gospel is universal ;
although in actual reality such universality can only be claimed
by a natural hyperbole." If we put aside the literal English ex-
pression, "every creatiu-e," there is no difficulty in understanding
the passage. Christian writers in all ages have quite rightly
pointed to the rapid spread of Christianity in the first century as
one of the evidences of its truth and power ; but the tendency of
the ordinary reader has been to over-estimate the results. Bishop
Lightfoot, in his admirable survey of the question,! shows that
the evidence of the early Christian Fathers testifies " rather to the
wide diffusion than to the overflowing munbers of the Christians."
His conclusion is that two centuries after Christ they were
probably one-twentietli of the subjects of the Roman Empire, and
one hundred and fiftieth of the whole human race. That they
were mainly confined to the towns is evident from the curious
fact that the \novA pcujani, villagers, became a synonym for non-
Christians, and is preserved to us in our familiar " Pagans."
But while we guard ourselves against an exaggerated view of Norunder-
the missionary zeal of the early Church, we must not ignore what ^***^^-
was actually done. Antioch sent out other missionaries besides
St. Barnabas and St. Paul ; and to this day the ancient Syrian
* EUicott's Commentary, in loco.
t Coinparutive Prvjrenn of Avfienf and Moihv ti Missions. S.P.G.
8
Missions before the Reformation
Part I.
Chap. 2.
30-1534.
Church of Southern India looks to Antioch as its ecclesiastical
centre. In Alexandria, Pantaenus presided over what we may call
the first Missionary College, and then went forth himself to
"India," though it has been doubted by some whether Ethiopia
or Arabia is not really meant by the term in this case. The
British Church of that day was in itself a brilliant result of mis-
sionary enterprise. An excellent summary of early Missions
occurs in a remarkable Essay on the Progress of the Gospel,
written by the Rev. Hugh Pearson (afterwards Dean of Salisbury)
in 1812, to which was adjudged by the University of Oxford the
Buchanan Prize of £500. An article by him, embodying much
of the Essay, was printed in the second and third numbers of
the first English missionary periodical, the Missionary Begister.'-''
It pointedly refers to Justin Martyr's well-known statement f
that (about the middle of the second century) "there was not a
nation, either of Greek or Barbarian or any other name, even
of those who wander in tribes or live in tents, amongst whom
prayers and thanksgivings were not offered to the Father and
Creator of the Universe l)y the name of the crucified Jesus";
but Pearson remarks, " These expressions may be admitted to be
somewhat general and declamatory."
The great external triumph of Christianity came when Con-
stantine, in a.d. 312, accepted the message, In hoc signo vinces, and
established the new religion upon the ruins of the old. Paganism
died hard ; if indeed it can truly be said to have died at all. Is
not the ancient bronze image of Jupiter in St. Peter's at Rome,
which for centuries, as the supposed statue of the apostle, has
been adored by countless multitudes until their kisses have worn
away the foot, a sign and token of the practical paganization of
a large part of Christendom ? And the establishment of Chris-
tianity under Constantine and Theodosius was by no means of
unmixed benefit to the cause of true religion. Prosperity and
pomp succeeded to crucifixion and the lions ; and Dr. George
Smith scarcely uses too strong language when he says,:[ " From a
purely missionary point of view, it began the system of com-
promise with error, of nationalism instead of individualism in
conversion, which in the East made tlie Church an easy prey to
Mohammedanism, and in the West produced Jesuit Missions."
Nevertheless the fact remains, and it is a great and glorious fact,
that for many centuries there has not been a nation — perhaps
not one single person — on the face of the earth worshipping the
gods of Greece and Rome. Jupiter and Juno, Mars and Minerva,
Venus and Apollo, are names familiar to every schoolboy ; but they
are gods no longer. The Jericho of classic Paganism reared its
* The first number of the Missionary Register, edited by the Rev. Josiah
Piatt, then Secretary of C.M.S., was published in January, 1813. (See p. 126.)
Mr. Pearson's article appears in the February and March numbers.
t Dial, cum Triiph., 117 fin.
X Short History of Chri.'^tian Missions, chap. v.
Missions before the Reformation 9
mighty walls before the apostolic Israel ; yet, like Joshua eighteen Part I.
centuries before, the despised little Christian army " took the city ." Chap. 2.
Then came the overthrow of the Koman Empire by the Northern
Barbarians ; but this did not involve the overthrow of the Church, conversion
Some of the Gothic tribes already professed Christianity. In their °nd°*^^
earliest raids, they had carried off many Christian captives, particu- Vandais.
larly from Cappadocia ; and these captives proved true mission-
aries of the cross, winning their savage masters to Christ, and
then sending for more teachers to carry on the work. Ullilas, the
Apostle of the Goths, was the chief instrument in the enterprise ;
and his name will always be honoured as the translator of the
Bible into the Gothic tongue ; an achievement of which Professor
Max Miiller thus speaks : — " At this time there existed in Europe
but two languages \vhich a Christian bishop would have thought
himself justified in employing — Greek and Latin. All other
tongues were considered barbarous. It required a prophetic
sight, and a faith in the destinies of those half-savage tribes, and
a conviction also of the effeteness of the Eoman and Byzantine
empires, before a bishop could have brought himself to translate
the Bible into the vulgar dialect of his barbarous countrymen." '^^
Others of the invaders of the Empire, though they came in as
Pagans, quickly embraced the religion of the conquered peoples ;
and Jerome wrote from his cell at Bethlehem, " Lo, the x\rmenian
lays down his quiver ; the Huns are learning the Psalter ; the
frosts of Scythia glow with the warmth of faith ; the ruddy armies
of the Goths bear about with them the tabernacles of the Church ;
and therefore, perhaps, do they fight with eqvial fortune against us,
because they trust in the religion of Christ equally with us." f
The history, however, is a sadly chequered one. Gothic Chris-
tianity was x\rian, and the heresies which the Council of Nicaea
had condemned again overspread Europe and North Africa.
Eeligious wars ensued, and the "Christian" Vandals persecuted
the orthodox believers as cruelly as Pagan Eome had done. But
they destroyed the old heathen temples with still greater ferocity ;
and it cannot be denied that in the fourth and fifth centuries the
religion of the Prince of Peace, like the religion of the False
Prophet afterwards, was propagated by the swoi'd. In the sack
of Eome by Alaric, the churches were spared while the temples
were razed to the ground ; but there was little of the spirit of the
Gospel in the Christendom of the Dark Ages that followed.
Except in oiu' own country. While Arians and Pelagians waged British •
war against the truth in East and West, while ecclesiastical pomp purest,
and pride were superseding the simplicity and devotion of earlier
centuries, while the bishops of Eome were laying the foundations
of Papal supremacy, England, Ireland, and Scotland presented
scenes and illustrations of true missionary enterprise. Patrick, Patrick,
the Apostle of Ireland, deserves to rank with the greatest of
* Lectures on the Science 0}' Longuage, Eihi. 1861, p. 175.
t Ejpist. 107, 2.
lona.
lo Missions before the Reformation
Part I. missionaries. In his preaching from the Scriptures, in his schools
Chap. 2. for the children, in his training of evangelists, in his employment
30-lo34. q£ women, he anticipated our modern methods ; while his spirit is
revealed Ijy his celehrated hymn, one verse of which, translated
from the Keltic, runs thus : —
Christ, as a light,
Illumine and gaicle me !
Christ, as a shield, o'ershadow and cover me !
Christ, he under me ! Christ, be over me !
Christ, be beside me
On left hand and right !
Christ, be before me, behicd me, about m^e !
Christ, this day, be within and -without me !
The result of his labours was wonderful. Ireland became known
as "the Island of Saints," and the European scholars who fled
from the turmoil and bloodshed of the Continent to its peaceful
shores called it " the University of the West." Then, as Scotland
had in the fifth century sent Patrick to Ireland, so Ireland in the
sixth sent Columba to Scotland ; and on the little island of lona
arose the abbey and monastery whence missionaries evangelized
all North Britain, and afterwards spread themselves over Europe.
From Lindisfarne in Northumberland to Bobbio in the Appenines
missionary centres were established ; and a purer Gospel was
diffused from them by Aidan and Cuthbert and Columbanus and
Gallus and Fridolin and Willibrord than was by that time preached
at Alexandria or at Eome. " The libraries of Milan preserve to this
day the copies of Holy Scripture which belonged to those early
evangelists, and which bear witness to their love of Scripture study
by the numerous interlineations and comments which they exhibit
in the Irish tongue." '■^'-
Augustin. Meanwhile Augustin the monk had been sent by Gregory the
Great to transform the Augli into angcli. The ancient British
Church had been overwhelmed by the Saxons, and survived only
in Wales and Cornwall, as well as in Scotland and Ireland ; and
while the evangelists of lona brought the Gospel from the North
into what had become a heathen country, Augustin from the
Soutli introduced the Papal system, so far as it had then been
developed, and, with it, concessions to heathen customs which
marred not a little the purity of the faith. The mission of
Augustin was a great event in the ecclesiastical history of England,
and its thirteenth centenary was rightly celebrated in 1897 by
the gathering of Anglican Ijishops at Canterbury from all parts
of the world ; but the purer British Christianity of the North and
the West, which prevailed before Augustin came, must never be
forgotten. The Anglo-Eoman Church thus founded also sent
forth its missionaries to the Continent, who not only planted the
Church among many of the Teutonic tribes, but were the chief
promoters of civilization, by means of the industrial and agricul-
* Bp. Fakenham Walsh, Heroes of the Mi-^sion Field, chap. iii.
Miss WAS before the Reformation ii
tural settlements that sprang up around the mission stations ; Part I.
while the monasteries, then in the earlier and purer stage of their Chap. 2.
history, were the centres of Scripture study and teaching. Of the ^^^^^*-
agents of this important work, Boniface, the Apostle of Germany, „ ^.^ ^^
was the greatest ; but although he was in some respects a true
missionary, he was undoubtedly the chief instrument of bringing
German Christianity into union with the Papacy. Neander thus
sums up the character and results of the rival Missions: — "The
British and Irish missionaries certainly surpassed Boniface in
freedom of spirit and purity of Christian knowledge ; luit Eome,
by its superior organization, triumphed in the end, and though it
introduced new and unscriptural elements into the Church, it
helped at the same time to consolidate its outward framework
against the assaults of Paganism."
The epoch of Charlemagne was an epoch of progress, but of
progress achieved mainly by the sword. The great emperor
imposed the profession of Christianity upon the nations he
subdued, despite the protests of his learned English friend Alcuin,
who, trained in the purer religion of Northumljria, urged that the
baptism of pagans was useless without faith, and that faith came,
not by compulsion, but by the grace of God. Our own King
Alfred was the one example of a monarch in those ages who seems
to have understood spiritual religion.
The next great missionary was Anschar, the Apostle of the Anschar.
North. His whole history is deeply interesting. Neander com-
pares Boniface to St. Peter and Anschar to St. John. From a
child he was the subject of divine grace. While still a boy he,
in a dream, saw the Saviour in His glory, fell, like John in
Patmos, "at his feet as dead," and received His forgiveness, —
awaking from the dream with an assurance of salvation that
lasted all his life. He became the evangelist of Denmark and
Sweden, and did a mighty work amid perils and persecutions as
great as have been encountered by any missionary in any age. If
his divinity school in Schleswig does not entitle him to be called
tlie first educational missionary, seeing that the training of native
teachers was an accepted metliod before his time, it may be truly
said that he was the first medical missionary, the cures wrought
at his hospital at Bremen giving rise to a belief among the ignorant
people that he wrought miracles — a power which he always dis-
claimed. It is noteworthy also that he anticipated Wilberforce by
nearly ten centuries in his denunciation of the slave trade. For
thirty-four years he laboured among the very Norsemen who were
about to descend upon Europe ; and it has been wxll observed
that the harvest from the seed he sowed appeared long after, when
the Dane Canute, having become King of England, suppressed the
remnants of heathenism and sent missionaries back to the North
to complete the evangelization of Scandinavia."
* Dr. G. Smith, Ghort History of Christian Missions, chap. viii.
12 Missions before the Reformation
Part I. Goths and Vandals, Huns and Franks, Celts and Saxons and
Chap. 2. Norsemen had now been brought within the pale of Christendom.
In Europe there still remained the Slavs. Cyril and Methodius,
Cyril and Greeks of Thessalonica, did a noble work in the ninth century by
Methodius, translating portions of Scripture into the old Sclavonic tongue ;
Adalbert of Prague preached the Gospel in Bohemia and Eastern
Prussia ; and the baptism of Vladimir established Christianity in
Kussia, as that of Clovis had established it in France.
The Dark One thousaud years of the Christian era had now run their
^^^^' course, and Christendom, in respect of spiritual tone and practical
morality, was at the lowest point it has ever touched. Ignorance
and superstition everywhere prevailed, and it might be said of
Cliristian Europe what has often l^een said of Heathen Asia and
Africa, that " the dark places of the earth were full of the habita-
tions of cruelty." Keliance on the virtue of supposed relics of
saints had practically superseded the believer's humble access to
the Father through the Son. The clergy, debased as a body
as they have never been before or since, traded upon all kinds
of imposture, and descended to "unspeakable abominations."*
Eome was governed by abandoned women, who put their lovers in
the papal chair ; and the principal dignitaries of the Church,
being " past feeling," had "given themselves over unto lascivious-
ness, to work all uncleanness with greediness." Suddenly, in the
year 1000 a.d., a cry arose that the end of the world was at hand, the
" thousand years " of Kevelation being completed ; and an extra-
ordinary account of the panic that ensued is given by Mosheim,
the ecclesiastical historian. But, like other panics, it soon sub-
sided, and Christian Europe went upon its wicked way.
No wonder that the Lord's great Command was forgotten, and
that even when Missions were carried on, they bore little re-
semblance indeed to the Acts of the Apostles. Meanwhile, the
Mohammedan power had for four centuries wrought havoc in the
lands of the Bible and of the Early Church. It had robbed the
Eastern Empire and Church of some of its fairest domains ; it
had overrun a great part of Western Asia ; it had totally destroyed
the North African Church ; it reigned supreme in Spain. Chris-
tendom in its decadence stood face to face with the Saracen and
The the Moor in the fulness of their vigour. Then arose Peter the
Hermit; and the cry " Dieu le veut," rang through Europe,
summoning Christians to a holy war. But the weapons of this
warfare were carnal, and the purpose of the Crusades was not the
evangelization of the Mohammedans, but their expulsion from the
Holy Land. The purpose was not fulfilled ; the Holy Sepulchre,
rescued for a time, once more fell into the hands of the Saracens ;
and in Moslem hands it has remained ever since. But just as
the Crusades were coming to a disastrous close, there was born in
the island of Majorca, in 1236, the man who was to proclaim a
* Canon George Trevor's Rome, (1868), p. 159. Canon Ti-evor was in his
day a prominent High Chiu'chman.
Missions before the Reformation 13
truer method of warring the Lord's war, and to become the first, Part I.
and perhaps the greatest, missionary to Mohammedans. Chap. 2,
There is no more heroic figure in the history of Christendom ^^^^^^'
than that of Eaymund Lull. Though much less generally known, j^^ mund
he deserves to be ranked with Francis of Assisi, who preceded LuII.
him by a few years, who anticipated him in his desire to preach
Christ to the Moslems, but who, in view of the revival work done
in Europe by hi« preaching friars, may rather be regarded as the
father of itinerant home missions. Raymund Lull, like St.
Augustine, spent his earlier years in a life of sensuality, and like
St. Augustine in his Confessions, recorded his spiritual experiences
in a book. On Divine Contemplation. Converted to Christ at
the age of thirty, the young noble thenceforward gave himself
and all he possessed to the service of His Saviour. He soon saw
what a true crusade ought to be. "The Holy Land," he said,
" can be won in no other way than as Thou, O Lord Christ, and
Thy Apostles w^on it, by love, by prayer, by shedding of tears and
blood." He began, however, by writing a philosophical book,
which was to convince all men, the Moors included, that Chris-
tianity was the only true religion ; and then he persuaded the
Council of Vienne to order the establishment of professorships of
Arabic and other Oriental languages at the universities, Oxford
included. Europe admired his philosophy, and the " Lullian
Art" was famous for two centuries; but his appeals for missions
and missionaries fell unheeded. At last, having learned Arabic
from a IMoorish slave, he resolved to go forth himself ; and in
North Africa, and Cyprus, and even Armenia, he patiently toiled
among the Mohammedans. Thus he himself reviews his life : — His seif-
" Once I was rich ; I had a wife and children ; I led a worldly life, denial.
All these I cheerfully resigned for the sake of promoting the
conmion good and diffusing al^road the holy faith. I learned
Arabic ; I have gone abroad several times to preach the Gospel to
the Saracens ; I have, for the sake of the faith, been cast into
prison ; I have been scourged ; I have laboured during forty-five
years to win over the shepherds of the Church and the princes of
Europe to the common good of Christendom. Now I am old and
poor ; but still I am intent on the same object, and I wall perse-
vere in it until death, if the Lord permit." Persevere he did,
" until death." When nearly eighty years old, he once more
crossed the Mediterranean and ministered to a little flock of
converts. Then, in his unconquerable courage, he stood forth
and called on the Moors who had imprisoned and banished him
before to embrace the Gospel. Their response was to di'ag him
out of the city and stone him to death. The motto of his great tyrd^."^"
book, despite its elaborate system of philosophy, was " He who
loves not lives not ; he who lives by the Life cannot die." Ray-
mund Lull loved, and lived ; and while he now lives for ever in
the presence of the Lord he loved, his example lives on earth for
missionaries in every age.
14 Missions before the Reformation
Part I. All through the centuries comprised in this brief sketch of
Chap. 2. Missions in Europe, the Churches of the East were also at work
^ ■ in Asia. Corrupt as they became, and sorely as they afterwards
Missions Suffered from Mohammedan oppression, the evangelization of the
in Asia. Heathen was not wholly forgotten. Persia received the Gospel as
early as the second century, and the terrible persecutions endured
by the Church there under the Sassanian kings furnishes one of
the most appalling chapters of Christian martyrology. The
tradition that the Syrian Church of Malabar, in South India, —
whose members call themselves "Christians of St. Thomas," —
was founded by the Apostle Thomas himself is not* accepted by
the best authorities ; and it is more likely that the saint buried at
the now familiar " St. Thomas's Mount," near Madras, was a
monk of the eighth century. But it is certain that this interesting
Church is very ancient. At the Council of Nicaea, a.d. 325, one of
the assembled bishops was " Johannes, Metropolitan of Persia and
the Great India." Two hundred years later, Cosmas, a merchant
of Alexandria, who had made several voyages to the Far East,
published a book called Tlie Christian Topograyhy of the Whole
World, to prove from his travels that the earth was flat and not
globular. This work Dr. G. Smith calls the first Indian Missionary
Eeport, and he quotes an interesting passage from it." " Even
in Taprobane " [Ceylon], says Cosmas, "there is a Church of
Christians with clergy and a congregation of believers. ... So
likewise among the Bactrians, and Hutas, and Persians, and the
rest of the Indians. . . . there is an infinite number of churches
with bishops and a vast multitude of Christian people. ... So
also in Ethiopia. . . . and all through Arabia."
Nestorian The Ncstoriaii Church is honourably distinguished by its
Missions. ii-,issionary zeal in Asia. At the very time that Mohammedanism
was beginning its destructive course in Western Asia, Nestorian
Christianity was spreading even to China and Tartary ; and while
Europe was in its darkest period of superstition, the tenth and
eleventh centuries, Christian bishops were presiding over dioceses
in Turkestan, Kashgar, and other parts of Central Asia wdiere
now, and for long ages past, Islam and Buddhism have divided
the land. Although Zingis Khan, the Mongol conqueror and
scourge of Asia, persecuted the Christians, his grandson Kublai
Khan, in the thirteenth century, favoured them, and Marco Polo
the Venetian traveller gives a deeply interesting account of
Asiatic Christendom under his tolerant sway. By this time
Rome was competing with the Nestorians for the spiritual
dominion of Asia, and Kublai Khan sent from Peking to the Pope
for wise and earnest Christian teachers to be posted all over the
A lost empire. The Church failed to respond, and to this day has never
oppor- ]-,g^jJ j^ second chance of evangelizing Central Asia.f In the
tunity. ° "
* Conversion of India, p. 29.
t Dr. G. Smith mentions as a sad ilhistration the Island of Socotra, whose
rocky eminence is now familiar to thousands of English travelleis across the
MiSSlOA'S BEFORE THE ReFOHMAT/OX I 5
fouiteentli centuiy, the Turks and the Tartars destroyed the Part I.
churches and put thousands of Christians to death with horrible Chap. 2.
tortures, while many others saved theii' lives by apostasy. The ^_ '
only remaining evidence to-day of the great Nestoi'ian Missions is
the celebrated monument at Si-ngan-fu in North-Western China,
which records the fact that in the seventh century " the illustrious
religion had spread itself in every direction, and (Christian temples
were in a hundred cities." '■'
Thus in the fifteenth century the tide of evangelization had christi-
actually ebbed, and Christendom occupied a smaller area than it fe^puTsed
had done two centuries l)efore. In the eloquent words of Dr.
Fleming Stevenson, — " Christianity had ovei'run Europe, but it
had almost disappeared from Asia, where it was born. The very
Palestine of Christ was in possession of the infidel. Antioch,
that had stretclied its patriarchate ovei' the East, and fostered
churches as far as the wall of China, was trodden by the feet of
Moslem conquerors. The schools of Alexandria were silenced by
ilie sword of Mohammed. Every sacred spot of the African
Church, the memories of Augustine, of Alypius, of Cyprian and
Tertullian, of Moni(;a and Perpotua, tlie regions that had been
liallowod by innumerable maityrs, were all overrun l)y Moham-
medanism. Cin-istianity was assailed even in Europe itself. The
cry of the muezzin was heard from a liundred minarets in the
city where Cln'ysostom preached to Christian emperors. The
fierce, sti-ong faith of the Arab not only held Constantinople but
almost reached to Rome. Nothing but the narrow waters of the
Adriatic lay between the centre of Latin Christendom and the
eager outposts of the Turk. Hundreds of years before this, there
had been a chain of mission churches from the Caspian almost to
the Yellow Sea ; the little Christian Kingdom of the Tartars,
I'uled by its Prester Johns, may not have stood alone ; but now,
tlie Nestorian occupation of Western China had shrunk down to
a tal)let with an inscription, and Tamerlane had swept every
trace of Christianity oft" the face of Central Asia. Ground had
been lost, century by century ; and for half a millenniinn no
ground had been won." f
Indian Ocean. So far back as the second century, Panticnas found Christians
there. Marco Polo tells of bishop, clergy, and people. In the seventeenth
century tlie inhabitants called themselves Chri.stiins, but niinglt>d Moslem
and Paj^an rites with their corrupt worship. Now Islam reijj^iis there
undisturbed Socotra, he observes, is "a living example of tin- failure of a
false or imperfect Christianity to regenerate a people."
* A picture and full account of this remarkable monument are given in
Dr. G. Smith's Conversion of India, p. 20.
t Daicn of the Modern Mission, p. 6. Edinburgh. 1887.
CHAPTER III.
Missions after the EeformatioTi.
Part I.
Chap. 3.
irj3-t-1786.
Why were
post-Re-
formation
Missions
Roman
and not
Pro-
testant ?
Roman Missions — Xavier — Erasmus — Early Protestant Efforts — Eliot
and the Red Indians — Cromwell, Boyle, Dr. Bray — S.P.C.K. and
S.P.G. — Bishop Berkeley — Lutheran Mission in India : Ziegenbalg
and Schwartz — Hans Egede — Moravians — Brainerd.
" Hoiu long are ye sJacl- to go to possess the land?" — Josh, xviii. 3.
" While inen slept, his enemy came avd snn-ed tares." — Matt. xiii. 25.
T is a remarkable and a humbling thing that the great
movement which delivered Northern Europe from the
Papacy, and restored to the individual Christian the
freedom of direct access to God through Christ, did
little or nothing for the evangelization of the world.
It did lead to Foreign Missions on a more extensive scale than
the world had yet seen ; but these Missions were organized, not
by the Churches that were rejoicing in their light and liberty, but
by the old corrupt Church whose yoke they had shaken off.
Rome lost the nations that were destined to be in the van of
progress in the following centuries ; but she responded by sending
her emissaries to the newly discovered America, and the East and
West Coasts of Africa, and by the new sea-route to the mysterious
East of Asia. To use Canning's famous phrase, she called a new
world into existence to redress the balance of the old.
The question may fairly be asked, How came it that the
Reformed Churches were so slack while the unreformed Church
was so vigorous ? Various answers have been suggested to this
question : for example, that the Reformers w^ere too much occu-
pied in making good their position at home to think of the
Heathen abroad," or that the Erastianism which subjected them
to the secular power dulled their zeal. It does not, however,
seem necessary to find reasons of this kind. A simple and sufifi-
cient cause is supplied by the fact that the navigating and
exploring nations of the day were Spain and Portugal. As a
Spanish Admiral (though himself a Genoese), Columbus discovered
America ; the Portuguese Vasco da Gama circumnavigated Africa
* " A victim escaping from the folds of a boa-constrictor is presumably
not in the condition of a vigorous athlete." Dr. A. C. Thompson, Protestant
Missions : Their Rise and Earlij Progress, New York, 1894.
M/ssroys after the Reformation 17
and opened up the now route to India and China. It was natural Part 1.
that the first missionaries to the vast territories thus rendered ^l^^^;^
accessible should ])e Spaniards and Portuguese ; and being so, they ^ "
were of course Romanists. It is the same principle that was em-
bodied long afterwards in Livingstone's pregnant words, "The end of
the geographical feat is the beginning of the missionary enterprise."
Still, if the opportunity was to be used, the agent was required.
The hour had come for the extension of Roman Christianity ; but
with the hour there must be the man. In this case there were
two men, Ignatius Loyola and Francis Xavier. Loj^ola founded
the Order of the Jesuits, the most potent instrument Rome has
had for extending her influence. Xavier was one of the seven Francis
men who, in the crypt of St. Denis on the heights of Mont- ^*'"^'■■
martre, banded themselves together to form that Order, in
the very year, 1534, in which the Act of Supremacy severed
England from the Papacy ; and he became the one missionary of
the Roman Church whom all Christendom honours. He led the
way to India and to Japan, and he died in the attempt to knock at
the closed door of China. But much undeserved glamour attaches
to Xavier's work. The marvellous results attributed to his labours
exist only in the imagination of those whom a Roman Catholic
historian, Mr. Stewart Rose, calls his "unwise biographers."
He never learned an Oriental language. Although he " made
Christians " {feci Christianos is his expression) rapidly in India
by baptizing Heathen infants and the most ignorant of the Tamil
fishermen, yet the Abbe Dubois, a Jesuit w-riter, says of him that
he was "entirely disheartened by the invincible obstacles he
everywhere met," and ultimately "left India in disgust"; and
this is confirmed by his own letters to Loyola. Indeed, so hope-
less did he regard any attempt to win the Heathen by preaching,
that he called on King John of Portugal to lay upon the governors
of his possessions in India the duty of forcing the Church upon
the Natives, and to punish severely any governor whose " con-
verts " w^ere few\ Bishop Cotton, most tolerant of Anglican pre-
lates, considered Xavier's methods " utterly wrong, and the results
in India and Ceylon most deplorable." Nevertheless, his zeal and
devotion call for unstinted admiration. He did love his Divine
Master ; he did love the souls for whom his Master died. His toils
and privations were heroically borne, and he never descended
to the fraud and falsehood by w-hich some of his successors
sought to spread the religion of Christ as they understood it. Some
great men are patterns ; some are beacons. Xavier was both.*
But most of his comrades and successors were beacons, and
not patterns. The history of Jesuit Missions, as told by the .jesmt^^^
Jesuits themselves, is one of the saddest portions of the Chiu'ch's '^^'° ^'
annals. Their identification with the aggi'andizement of the
* The most instructive, and perfectly fair, Life of Xavier, is that by Henry
Venn, Hon. Sec. of the C.M.S. (London, 1S62.) See Chapter LXVIII.
VOL. I. C
1 8 Missions after the Reformation
Part I. nations that sent them forth, then' use of the secular arm, their
Chap^3. estabhshment of the Inquisition in Malabar, in Japan, in the
lo34-l786. Philippine Islands, in Mexico and South America ; the frightful
tortures inflicted by them on both Heathen and heretics (e.g. the
burning alive at Goa of the Metropolitan of the Syrian Church in
1654); their "unholy accommodation of Christian truth and
observances to heathenish superstitions and customs," as Mr.
Rowley of the S.P.G. expresses it ; the impostures practised by
Robert de Nobili in the hope by their means of winning the
Brahmans ; — these are only some of their principal features. And
what were the results ? On both sides of Africar on the Congo
and in Mozambique, countries once nominally Christian are now
Heathen, though some of the cities (like San Salvador) still bear
Christian names. The really shocking story of the Congo Mission
is told by a sympathizer, the Italian Pigafetta, Chamberlain to
Pope Innocent IX. In India the adherents of Rome are numerous,
but Bishop Caldwell of Tinnevelly was only one of the many
witnesses to the same fact when he wrote, " The Roman Catholic
Hindus, in intellect, habits, and morals, do not differ from the
Heathen in the smallest degree." ='■ Similar testimony comes from
China.!
Men While, therefore, we are bound to acknowledge the self-denial
methods ^^^^ devotion of many of the Roman missionaries, and not to
wrong. doubt that there have been among them not a few who, knowing
Christ as their own Saviour, have earnestly preached Him to the
Heathen, it is impossible to shut our eyes to the plain facts of
history as recorded by themselves ; and these facts of history
exhibit a work which, upon the whole, however zealously done, no
well-instructed Christian can suppose to have commanded the
Divine blessing. The methods of the Jesuit missionaries, indeed,
were repeatedly condemned by the Popes themselves ; and it is
right to say that the Dominicans and Franciscans have been less
open to the same censure. The societies, orders, and other mis-
sionary bodies within the Roman Church are almost as numerous
as those of Reformed Christendom, although to some extent they
have been generally supervised by the College De Propaganda
Fide, established at Rome in 1622.
We now turn to the beginnings of Protestant Missions. In the
Erasmus very year in which the Jesuit Order was founded, Erasmus wrote
Missions, his famous Treatise on Preaching. He was only in a partial
sense a Reformer, but his brilliant mind reahzed, as neither Luther
nor Calvin nor Cranmer did, the duty of the Church to evangelize
tHe world.
" Everlasting God ! " he wrote ; " how much ground there is in the
world where the seed of the Gospel has never yet been sown, or where
there is a greater crop of tares than of wheat ! Europe is the smallest
* S.P.G. Digest, p. 541.
t Fui'ther evidence is given in a paper read by the Autiior of this History
at the Anglican I.Iissionary Conference of 1894. Report, p. 171.
Missions after the Reformation 19
quarter of the globe. . . . What, I ask, do we now possess in Asia, 1'art I.
which is the largest continent? In Africa what have we'? There are Cliap^:?.
surely in these vast tracts barbarous and simple tribes who ct)uld easily 1534- 1786 ■
be attracted to Christ if we sent men among them to sow the gocKl seed.
Regions hitherto unknown are being daily discovered, and more there
are^ as we are told, into which the Gospel has never yet been carried.
Travellers bring home from distant lands gold and gems ; but it is
worthier to carry hence the wisdom of Christ, more preci(nis than gold,
and the pearl of the Gospel, w^hich would put to shame all earthly riches.
Christ orders us to pray the Lord of the harvest to send forth labourers,
be<!ause the harvest is ]>lcnteous and the labourers are few. Must we
not then pray God to thrust forth labourers into such vast tracts? . . .
Bestir yourselves, then, ye heroic and illustrious leaders of the army of
Christ. . . . Address yourselves with fearless minds to such a glorious
work. ... It is a hard work I call you to. but it is the noblest and
highest of all. Would that God had accounted me worthy to die in so
holy a work ! " *
But the Kefoi-med Clmrches ^ve^e slow to respond to this stirring
appeal. For a century and a half Missions were mainly the work
of isolated individuals. x\pparently the very first attempt was Fj.^^'^t^^^^^^
that of the noble Huguenot, Admiral Cohgny, in 1556. He a^empfs"*
obtained a band of men from Calvin at Geneva and sent them to
Brazil, in connexion with a projected French colony there ; but
they were cruelly treated, and some of them killed, by a treacherous
governor ; and the enterprise came to naught. The second
Protestant Mission was sent from Sweden to the Laplanders, Swedish,
under the patronage of Gustavus Vasa, in 1559. Early in the
next century, the Dutch, now freed from the tyranny of Spain, Dutch.
began to engage in colonial enterprise, and, as in the case of
Spain and Portugal, this led to Missions being planned also. In
1612, ten years before the establishment of the Propaganda at
Rome, a missionary college was founded at Leyden by Anthony
WalfBUS. Men were sent to the new colonies in the East Indies ;
and Grotius wrote for their use his great work on the Truth of
Christianity. But the methods adopted cannot be commended.
What Xavier had asked the King of Portugal to do, the Dutch
governors did. They made the profession of Christianity a con-
dition of civil rights, and the Natives were baptized by the thousand
with the smallest modicum of instruction. The immediate external
success, of course, was immense ; but it did not last. AVherever
the Dutch rule ceased, by British conquest or otherwise, these
multitudes of nominal Christians reverted to Heathenism.
It was in Germany that the truer missionaiy spirit began to German,
show itself here and' there. Peter Heyling of Lubeck went to
Abyssinia in 1632, and there translated the New Testament into
Amharic. Von Welz, an Austrian baron, appealed to the German
nobihty in 1664 to send the Gospel to the Heathen, and projected
for the purpose a Society of the Love of Jesus ; but Lutheranism
* The Avhole passage, a lone and most eloquent one, is given by Dr. G.
Smith, 6h,;-t History oj Christian ilis^iors, chap. x.
c 2
20 Missions after the /^efor^uation
Part I. had then become ahnost dead and cold, and a leading theological
Cliap^:s. professor protested against casting such pearls as " the holy things
1534-1786. q£ Qq^ " i-,efoj;e "dogs and swine " like Tartars and Greenlanders.
" As for the Society of the Love of Jesus," he added, " God save
us from it ! " But the Pietist movement was commencing, which
was destined to be in Germany what the Methodist movement
was in England ; and under devoted leaders like Francke at Halle
and Spener at Berlin, the evangelistic spirit gradually spread
which afterwards provided the English Church Societies with
many of their earhest missionaries. This, however, would bring
us into the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Before leaving
the seventeenth, we must come to England and x\merica.
English. English Missions also grew out of colonial enterprise. The very
first missionary contribution in England was Sir Walter Ealeigh's
gift of £100 to the company which founded the Elizabethan colony
of Virginia, " for the propagation of the Christian religion in that
settlement." In the charter given by James I. to the same com-
pany, it was provided that " the word and service of God be
preached, planted, and used, not only in the said colony, but, as
much as may be, among the savages bordering among them";
and on November 13th, 1622, Dr. John Donne, Dean of St. Paul's,
delivered before this company what may fairly be regarded as the
first missionary sermon preached in England. But the Pilgrim
Fathers who colonized New England were the first to produce a
John Eliot, genuine missionary, in the person of John Ehot. He was for
sixty years the minister of the village of Eoxbury, now a suburb
of Boston ; but the Eed men familiarized to a later generation by
the picturesque tales of Fenimore Cooper then peopled the forests
covering what is now the prosperous state of Massachusetts ; and
among them Eliot laboured with a devotion and success that
earned for him the title of Apostle of the Indians. Inspired l)y
his own motto, "Prayer and pains, through faith in Jesus Christ,
will do anything," he mastered and reduced to writing the Mohican
language,* and translated into it the whole Bible ; which transla-
tion is still extant as a curiosity, though not available for practical
use.t Many of the Red Indian tribes utterly disappeared before
the advance of the white settler. All the more must we honour
the man who "served his owm generation by the will of God"
and evangelized them while there was time.
But who paid for the printing of the book, and otherwise sup-
ported Eliot's work ? Shortly after he began his labours, England
as a nation very nearly became a great missionary society. The
House of Commons, under Cromw-ell's auspices, took up the ques-
* What the task was may be guessed if we print here one word, simply
meaning " catechism " : — Kiimmogol-donattoottammoctiteaovganniwyioyiatih.
I In the first edition of this work it was stated, as has often been stated
else-.v'here, that there is no one now who can read Eliot's Bible. Bishop
Whipple of Minnesota, however, has sent interesting evidence that this is
incorrect.
Miss /am after the Reformatios- 21
tion. iLs journals record that, in 1G48, " the Commons of Enghind Part I
assembled' in Parliament, having received intelhgence that tlie ^^^l\^-
heathens in New England are beginning to call upon the name ot —
the Lord, feel bound to assist in the work." A " Society for the cromweii
Propagation of the Gospel in New England " was established, the foun,ds^
first of three distinct organizations which have borne the initials .. s.p.c-
S.P.G. A collection was made for it throughout England, which,
invested in land, produced an income of £600 a year ; and from
this fund grants were made to John Eliot. Cromwell had also a
project for converting the old Chelsea College into a great mis-
sionary institution, dividing the world into four great Mission-
fields, and directing the work in them by four secretaries paid by
the State ; but his death, and the Eestoration, put an end to these
plans. Under Charles II. the Society was reorganized by the
energy of the Hon. Eobert Boyle, and may be said to have become
a second S.P.G. It still exists under the name of^ the New |econd
England Companv, and disl)urses its funds in Nova Scotia and
New Brunswick. •' Eobert Boyle was a man of true missionary
ardour. The Lectureship he endowed, and which bears his name,
was designed for missionary appeals. He paid for a translation
into Arabic of the treatise by Grotius before mentioned, and also
for a translation of part of the New Testament into Malay,
evidently for the use of the Dutch missionaries. He bequeathed
a large sum to found a "Christian Faith Society" for the
evangelization of Virginia ; which society also still exists, apply-
ing its funds, since the secession of the United States, to the
benefit of the British West Indies and Mauritius. About the
same time. Dean Prideaux set forth a scheme for Missions m
India ; the result of which was that at the next revision of the
East India Company's charter, in 1698, Parliament enacted that
the ministers sent to India for the Enghsh traders " should apply
themselves to learn the language of the country, the better to
enable them to instruct the Gentoos [Gentiles or Heathen] who
should be the servants of the Company in the Protestant religion."
This enactment, however, was not obeyed until the days of Henry
Martyn, more than a century afterwards.
We now come to a great epoch in the history of English Mis-
sions. The Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge was foumled Th^ ^ ^
in 1698, and the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel m 1701. and's.p.b.
These two great societies owed their origin to the zeal and energy ^^'"'^■
of one man. Dr. Thomas Brav, Eector of Sheldon, Warwickshire. Dr. Brays
lie was one of a little group of men to whom the Church of Eng-
land at that day owed much. The most striking figure among them
was that of Eobert Nelson, tlie typical High Cliurch layman, as
the term "High Church" was then understood.! The group
* See CM. Iiitrlli.jcii,;',; May, 1886.
t See the cvtretnelv interesting essay by C. J. Abhov, m Abbey aiul
nvertou'a English Cliu'rrh in tlw Kijhteentit Centunj, ..ii " H..l.erL Nel.sou uiul
his Friends."
efforts.
22
M/SS ION'S AFTER THE REFORMATION
Part I.
Chap. 3.
1534-1786.
Third
S.P.G.
Its con-
stitution.
included both Jurors and Non-jurors, that is, those who did and
those who did not take the oath of allegiance to William III.
Dr. Bray was a supporter of the new regime ; Nelson was not ;
bu1} they worked together with exemplary cordiality in various
schemes of moral and social reform. Bray's thoughtful energy
took tw^o directions : he devised plans for establishing libraries for
poor clergy at home and abroad, and his interest in the Colonies
took him across the Atlantic to Maryland under a special commis-
sion from the Bishop of London. In these two enterprises we see
the germs of the S.P.C.K. and S.P.G. respectively..
The S.P.C.K. was founded in 1698, as a voluntary aiid, onemay
almost say, private society, by Dr. Bray and four lay friends, who
signed their names to the following statement : — " Whereas the
growth of vice and immorality is greatly owing to gross ignorance
of the principles of the Christian religion, we whose names are
underwritten do agree to meet together as often as we can con-
veniently, to consult (under the conduct of the Divine Providence
and assistance) how we may be al)le by due and lawful methods to
promote Christian knowledge." But I)r. Bray wanted more than
this. The new society was to provide schools and literature, and
to subsidize other institutions with the same object. It was not
proposed to employ living agents, and it was living agents that the
Colonies required. The good doctor therefore planned another
organization for that purpose, and drew up a petition to the King
for the incorporation of a new societ)^ which was backed by the
Archbishop of Canterbury. Simultaneously with this, the atten-
tion of Convocation was called to the needs of the Colonies, and a
Conmiittee was appointed to consider them. The two movements
appear to have been quite independent, and possi1)ly both may
have had influence ; but the charter granted by the Crown was
certainly in response to Dr. Bray's petition."-'' The name of the
new body thus established was The Society for the Propagation of
the Gospel in Foreign Parts, the same title as had been borne by
the two associations before mentioned, but with the words " in
Foreign Parts" added. This was therefore the third " S.P.G.,"
and the permanent one.
The S.P.C.K. and the S.P.G. differed, not only in object, but
also in constitution. The former w^as a private society, to the
membership of which, at first, even bishops were only elected
" after inquiries " ; and for many years it published no historical
account of itself and held no anniversary. The S.P.G., though
also a voluntary society, in that it was not established by the
Church as such, and even the President w^as not the Archbishop
of Canterbury ex officio, but was elected annually ,t yet was a
great public organization, wdth eleven bishops among its incor-
* See S.P.G. Digest, pp. 4-7 ; also Hole, Early Histnri/ of C.M.S., p. xxvii.
t This continned to be the case until recently, under the original Charter.
The new Charter, granted in 1882, provides that the Archbishop of Canteu-
bury for the time being shall be President.
M/SS/OA\'^ AFTER THE REFORMATION 23
ponited members, an anniversavy sermon and meeting, and a Part 1.
printed annual report. /-"'IT^tk"-
By " Foreign Parts" in the title of S.P.G. was understood the ^'^•^'*2_^'-
colonies and dependencies of Great Britain ; and the purpose of its s^ope.
the society, as defined in the charter, was the spiritual benefit of
" our loving subjects " who were in danger of falling into " atheism,
infidelity, popish superstition, and idolatry." In the very first
annual sermon, however. Dr. Willis, Dean of Lincoln, announced
that the design was " first, to settle the state of rehgion, as well as
may be, among our own people there, . . . and then to proceed in
the best methods . . . toward the conversion of the Natives";
and, from the first, the Society took measures to reach both the
Eed Indians and the Negro slaves in the American Colonies. But
Heathen and Mohammedan nations outside the limits of the
British Empire were not included in the range of the Society's
direct work until it had been in existence a century and a half.
It was owing to this limitation that the Danish Mission to India,
presently to be noticed, was not taken up by the S.P.G., but by the
S.P.C.K. ; for it was in territory not then belonging to England.
The S.P.G. did indeed, when only eight years old, show its
sympathy with that Mission by a gift of £20 from some of its
members ; a gift memorable as the first English contribution to the
evangelization of India. But after that, for a whole century, the s.p.c.k.
India Mission was supported in England only by the S.P.C.K. ;
and not only supported, but ^drtually directed. The missionaries
were all Germans or Danes, of the Lutheran Church, trained in
their own country and ordained according to their own rite.
But they came to England for instructions before sailing ; and
excellent "Charges" were delivered to them by clergymen
of reputation. '•■ It is interesting to notice that when the most
eminent of them, Schwartz, ordained, according to the Lutheran
use, a catechist named Satyanadhan, to be what was called a
" country priest," the S.P.C.K. recorded this ordination, not by
a bishop, but by a Lutheran minister, with special pleasure. " If
we wish," said the venerable Society in its next Eeport, " to
estabhsh the Gospel in India, we ought in time to give the
Natives a Church of their own, independent of our support . . .
and secure a regular succession of truly apostolical pastors, even
if all communication with their parent Church should be annihi-
lated." The Mission was transferred to the S.P.G. in 1824, after
just one hundred years' labour.
The most important British Colonies being those on the
American Continent, viz., what are now the United States, the
* A volume of these "Charges" was published by the S.P.C.K. in 1822.
One, by Archdeacon Middleton, afterwards first Bishop of Calcutta, delivered
to a German missionary, Jacobi, in 1813, is very able and interesting, and is
particularly notable for its fearless condemnatiou of Roman Missions, and
its warm recognition of the work of the Lutherans and of tlie Natives they
had ordained.
in India.
24 Missions after titf. J^efcirmatioa
Part 1. West Indies, and also Canada after its conquest from the French,
Chap. 3. the S.P.G. operations were for a lonjj period chiefly concentrated
there ; and a noble work was done, both among the settlers and
S.P.G. in among the Indians and Negroes. It is a memorable fact that
an'd^Afrfca "^^'^^^^^ Jolin Wesley went to Georgia in 1736, it was as an S.P.G.
clergyman. The most interesting of the Society's other enter-
prises in the eighteenth century was in West Africa. One of its
clergy in America, a Fellow of Christ's College, Cambridge, the
Eev. T. Thompson, offered to go to the Gold Coast, and actually
laboured there for three or four years from 1753-. An African
l)oy whom he sent to England to be educated, Philip Quaque,
was ultimately ordained as his successor, " the first of any non-
European race since the Eeformation to receive Anglican orders," ■■'■
and for fifty years laboured amid painfully difficult surroundings.
One other Church movement in this century must be noticed.
Bishop In 1725, Bishop Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne in Ireland, set forth
^^ ^ ^^' a proposal for establishing a college at Bermuda, and making that
island a modern lona, as a base for Missions to the Eed Indians
and the Negro slaves. Having, l)y dint of indomitable perse-
verance, obtained a royal charter and a parliamentary grant of
£20,000 for the endowment of the college, he actually himself
sailed for America, intending to purchase land as an investment
for its support. But every obstacle was thrown in his way by
the Colonial Office ; the money promised was never paid ; and
Berkeley had ultimately to abandon the scheme. i "A glaring
instance," says Dr. Overton, " of the blighting effects of the
W^ilpole Ministry upon the Church. "| "Betrayed by Walpole,"
is the comment of Dr. G. Smith. §
We now revert to the Pietist movement in Germany, to find
the origin of that India Mission which the S.P.C.K. adopted.
True missionary zeal is ever preceded by a quickening of spiritual
lite ; and it was the revival of spiritual religion in the midst of the
cold latitudinarianism into which the Lutheran Church had fallen
that led to the most effective missionary work of the eighteenth
Danish century. But it was a king of Denmark (Frederick IV.) to whom
t^'fndia. God's message first came in 1705, through a petition from a poor
widow whose husband had been murdered by natives in the
Danish settlement at Tranquebar, on the south-east coast of
India. The king reflected that " for ninety years there had been
a Danish East India Company ; for ninety years Danish ships had
sailed to Tranquebar ; Danish merchants had traded and grown
rich in the settlement, Danish governors had ruled it, Danish
soldiers had protected it ; but no ship had ever carried a Danish
missionary to preach the Gospel." |j He appealed to his chaplain
* S.P.G. BigeAt, p. 256.
t Bishop S. Wilberforce, Hi.'ifonj of the American Cliiirch, p. 155.
+ English Chuirh in the Eighteentti Century, chap. viii.
§ Ijife of Bi>iliop Heher, p. .'>.
II W. Fleming Stevenson, Vaicn. of the Modern Mi^.-^iun, p. Sfi.
.Missions after the Reformation 25
for men ; the chaplain wrote to the Pietist leaders, Francke and Part I.
Lange ; they sent him a young Saxon, Bartholomew Ziegenhalg, j^g^^^^^gg
and a fellow-student of his, Henry Plutscho ; and these two were ° ^
sent to India at the king's own expense. The story of the arrival
and landing of these two pioneers, of the opposition of the Danish
governor and their consequent trials, of their extraordinary industry
and patience and devotion, is one of the most thrilling in the whole
history of Missions/'^ No truer missionary than Ziegenhalg ever
went to Heathendom. His greatest work was the translation of
tlie New Testament and part of the Old into Tamil, the first
Indian version of the Scriptures. He visited Europe in 1715, and
came to England ; and here he was warmly received by King
George I. and the Archbishop of Canterbury. Eeturning to India,
he died in 1719 at the age of thirty-six, leaving behind him three
hundred and fifty Tamil converts, some schools, the Tamil
Scriptures just mentioned, and a Tamil dictionary and grammar.
The greatest of Ziegenbalg's immediate successors was Schulze,
a learned scholar and capaljle organizer. In later years the names
of Fabricius, Kohlhoft', Gericke, and Jsenicke appear. But as an
historic character, the first name of all in importance is that of
Christian Frederick Schwartz, who must always be regarded as Schwartz,
standing in the front rank of Indian missionaries. Like most of
the others, he was a fruit of the Pietist movement ; and he
was enlisted in missionary service by Schulze, who had retired to
Germany. He went out in 1749, the very year in w^hich Von
Bogatsky composed the first German missionary hymn, with the
title, " A Prayer to the Lord to send faithful labourers into His
harvest, that His Word may be spread over all the world." It
begins thus : —
iriic/i (((//, dn Geist der ersten Zciigen.
Awake, 'J'liou Spirit, Who of old
Didst fire tlie watchini-u of the Church's youth,
Who faced the foe, unshrinkiug, bold,
Who witnessed day and night the eternal truth ;
AVhose voices through the world are ringing still.
And bringing hosts to know and do Thy will !
Under Schwartz the Mission was extended far beyond the little
Danish settlement of Tranquebar. From Madras to Tinnevelly,
over the whole Tamil country,- — in particular in what was then
the independent kingdom of Tanjore, — its influence spread, and
numerous congregations were gathered. These Missions, unlike
Tranquebar itself, were not under the Danish administration, but
were more directly the w^ork of the S.P.C.K., though the mis-
sionaries came from the same German sources. The external
results were considerable. At least fifty thousand Tamils were
baptized before the close of the century. Schwartz himself gained
* It is picturesquely told by Dr. Fleming Stevenson in Tlte Dawn of the
Modern UlinsiDn (Edinburgh, 1SS7), and by Dr. A. C. Thompson in Protestant
i/i.s-s I'oxs (New York, lS9i).
26 AffSSrONS AFTER THE REFORMATION
Part I. extraordinary influence over both Europeans and Indians. No
Chap^3. other missionary has ever wielded such pohtical authority. What
lo.M-l/86. ^yQui(;[ )-)e dangerous, and compromising to a Mission, in ahiiost
any one else, became in Schwartz a power for good. Hyder Ali,
the famous Eajah of Mysore, certainly the most formidable Native
ruler with whom England has had to cope, on one occasion
declined to receive any emissary from the British authorities
except Schwartz. "Send me the 67ms ^m^i," he exclaimed ; "I
can trust him ! " When Schwartz died in 1798, after almost half
a century's unbroken labours^for he never returned^ to Europe,- — ■
the Eajah of Tanjore gave a commission, which Flaxman the
sculptor executed, for a monument to be put up in the garrison
church at Tanjore ; and there this monument, representing the
Eajah himself receiving the benediction of the dying missionary,
may be seen to this day.
Decay But while Scliwartz and his comrades are to be admired and
Mi^s^slon. their memory cherished, their missionary pohcy was not one that
can be altogether approved. They baptized inquirers far too
readily ; they tolerated many heathen customs ; they chose, as
Mr. Sherring expresses it,''' to make caste a friend rather than an
enemy, and thereby admitted a traitor within the citadel and
prepared the way for the ruin of the work. After Schwartz's
death the professing Christians relapsed by thousands into
Heathenism ; and when the eighteenth century closed, there was
comparatively little to show as the result of its labours. A few
Lutheran missionaries were still at work ; but the funds of the
S.P.C.K. were slack at the time, and the whole enterprise
languished for many years. Slower progress, we can now see,
would have been surer ; and if a more solid foundation had been
laid, the edifice would not have fallen into ruin. How the Mission
revived under the S.P.G., in the present century, will appear
hereafter.
To go back to King Frederick IV. of Denmark. It was not
only India that owed its first Protestant Mission to him. Under
Hans his royal and godly auspices, too, Hans Egede, the Norwegian
^^^^^- pastor, went with his noble wife to Greenland. The story of
their sufferings is most touching. Egede returned, a solitary
widower, after fourteen years' indescribable privations and
bitter disappointments, and after preaching on these words in
Isaiah xlix. : — " I said, ... I have spent my strength for nought,
and in vain : yet surely my judgment is with the Lord, and my
work with my God." His own labours had indeed seemed
almost fruitless ; but their fruits appeared afterwards, and in-
directly they led to one of the grandest missionary enterprises of
modern times.
For it was in the same year, 1722, in which Egede sailed for
Greenland, that a baiid of those old Moravian Christians who had,
* Hif<tory of Protetstanf Missions in India, edition of 1884., p. 50.
Af/SS/O.'V.': AFTER THE REFORMATIO^' 2'J
since the fifteenth century, boine the name of Unitas Fratnim, Tart I.
migrated into Saxon Silesia to escape persecution. There, welcomed ^.'^^P;.^;
by that devoted servant of the Lord, Count Zinzendorf, they " ' '
established their famous settlement of Herrnhut. Eleven years Moravian
later, Count Zinzendorf was at Copenhagen representing Saxony ^^'ssions.
at the coronation of a new king of Denmark. This new king had
commanded Egede's Mission in Greenland to be given up — that is,
that no more supplies be sent to it ; and the Count, stirred by the
siglit of two Eskimo boys whom Egede had baptized and sent to
Europe, went back to Herrnhut, and told the Brethren of the
crisis. Just at the same time, they heard of the sufferings of tlie
Negro slaves in the West Indies. These two pieces of intelligence
were God's message to the Unitas Fratrum. Two men volunteered
for Greenland, and two for the island of St. Thomas ; and the
Moravian Missions l)egan. No Church has obeyed the Lord's
command wath the same devotion and self-forgetfulness that have
been manifested by the Church of the United Brethren. In
Greenland and Labrador, in Central and South America, in West
and South Africa, on the borders of Thibet, and among the
Australian aborigines, they have fearlessly preached the Gospel of
Christ. This little community, never exceeding 70,000 souls, has
sent forth two thousand missionaries.
In the meantime, besides the Missions among the American
Indians and Negroes carried on by the S.P.G., the Christian com-
munities of New^ England, Pennsylvania, and other colonies were
engaged in the same work. Of the many faithful men who gave
their lives to it in the eighteenth centur)-, the most celebrated was
David Brainerd. In 1709 a " Society for Propagating Christian Brainerd.
Knowledge " had been founded in Scotland. Its primary object
was home missions in the Highlands ; Init for a time it gave the
Presbyterian colonists of New York and New Jersey a grant to
maintain two missionaries to the Indians. In 1744 Brainerd was
chosen as one of these two. He laboured among the Delaware
tril)e less than three years, and died of consumption at the age of
twenty-nine ; but in that short time a wonderful work of the Spirit
of God was done. But Brainerd did less in his lifetime than his
biography, by President Edwards, did after he was gone. In its
pages is presented the picture of a man of God such as is rarely
seen. No book has, directly or indirectly, borne richer fruit. It exer-
cised a definite spiritual influence upon William Carey and Samuel
Marsden and Henry Martyn and Thomas Chalmers, and, through
them, indirectly, upon countless multitudes. Sometimes God
ordains for His servants a long life of blessing. Sometimes He
calls them away after a few brief years' service, but then makes
their names and memories an inspiration to others. Such have
been David Brainerd, Henry Martyn, and James Hannington.
Being dead, they yet speak.
This long and yet brief sketch of the Missions of eighteen
centuries will show that the Lord has never suffered His great
2S
AfjSSIONS AFTER THE Rp.FOKMATlOK
Part I. Command to be wholly forgotten. In eveiy age the Gospel has
1' 3^1786 ^^^"^ preached as a witness somewhere among the Heathen
^ _^ ' nations. The eighteenth century itself, with all its spiritual
deadness, was, as we have seen, a period whose Missions are not
to be despised. Nevertheless, one can find in the England of this
period scarcely any trace of the true missionary spirit which seeks
Missionary the evangelization of the world. Oui-~liymn -writers, indeed, had
Hymns. already caught the inspiration. Watts rendered the great mis-
sionary Psalm into English verse, in his " Jesus shall reign
where'er the sun," as far back as 1719 ; and within the next three
or four years Williams's " O'er the gloomy hills of darkness " and
Shrubsole's " Arm of the Lord, awake, awake ! " were written.
But they failed to suggest to Christians who sang them their
personal duty in the matter. The great awakening only came in
the closing years of the century.
From Cohimhu^, by C. E. Markliam (CI. Philip & Sou).
part ih
ONE HUNDEED YEARS AGO
1786-1811.
NOTE ON PART IT.
This Part is entitled "One Hundred Years Ago"; but it looks back
over sixty years of the Eighteenth Century, and brings us down to the
thirteenth year of the Nineteenth Century. It is essential to a right
understanding of the origin and early years of the Church Missionary
Society that the condition of the Chin-ch of England in the Eighteenth
Century is realized. Chap. IV., therefore, sketches its leading features,
and notices V)oth the earlier Methodist Revival and the later Evangelical
Movement within the Church ; distinguishing, as it is important to do, the
first generation of Evangelicals, among whom Henry Venn of Hudders-
tield Avas a leading figure, and the second generation of Evangelicals, of
whom his son John Venn of Clapham was a leader. Then in Chap. V.
we turn aside to view the condition of " Africa and the East " when the
Society was founded, bringing the narrative of Wilberforce's efl'orts
down to the year 1800. Chap. VI. concentrates our attention on the
events, especially in 1786, which led to the Missionary Awakening, and
introduces us to the Eclectic Society and its discussions. Chaps. VII.
and VIII. tell the stt)ry of the actual establishment of the Society and
the going forth of the first missionaries. In Chap. IX. we resume tiie
review of African and Indian affairs, and rejoice with Wilberforce over
both the Abolition of the Slave Trade and the Opening of India to tho
Gospel vuider the Charter of 1813.
THOMAS CLAR'KSON
ZACHARY MACAULAY.
WILLIAM WILBERFORCE.
JOHN BACON.
HENRY THORNTON.
Thomas Clarkson, Leader in Anti-Slave Tnulc Campaifiu. (Photograph by
Walker & Boutall, Clifford's Inn.)
Zachary Macaulay, Leader in Anti-Slave Trade Carapaiyn.
Williaiu AVilliertorce, M.H., Leader in Anti-Slave Trade Canipaigu.
.Iiihn liacun, Sculptor, Member of Original C.M.S. Committee.
Henry Tlioriiton, Hanker and Philanthropist.
cnAi'Ti:!; iv.
The TiKlHTKKSril I'KNTlin- and the liVAXOElJr.iL h'EMVAL.
The Church under the Georges Butler and Wesley The Methodist
Movement Wesleyans, Calvinists, Evangelicals — The Last Decade
—Second Generation of Evangelicals The Clapham Sect.
'' Our J'athcru understood not Thy wonders . . . they remembered not th<'. mvH' -
tude of Thy mercies ; . . . Nevertheless He savcdthem for His name's sake, that
He might viake His mighty power to be known." — Ps. cvi. 7, 8.
ET us take our stand in England one hundred years Part 11.
ago, and survey the world — the world which God ^/f|*^'^'''
loved, the world for which the Son of God hecanie ''*''' '
incarnate, and died, and rose again— the world a Survey
which He gave in charge to His Church, that she a^o^***^^
might proclaim to every creature the good tidings of His redemp-
tion. Nearly eighteen centuries have run their course since He
went up from Olivet to the right hand of the Father : what
has the Church done ?
Europe — hut for the ruling race in Turkey — is Christian, that
is. Christian hy profession, Christian according to statistical tables.
Asia is Mohannnedan or Heatlien. In India the English con-
querors have done almost nothing to pass on the great Message to
the multitudes lately come under their sway. A handful of
Germans have laboured in the south, and gathered a good many
small congregations of converts ; and a self-educated Englisli
cobbler has just settled in Bengal with a like object in view ;
and that is all. In Ceylon, the Dutch regime has compelled
thousands to call themselves Christians, who, at the lirst con-
venient opportunity, will slip back into Buddhism. China is
closed, though within her gates there are scattered bands of men
acknowledging " the Lord of heaven " and owning allegiance to
the Pope of Rome. Japan is hermetically sealed : the Jesuit
tyranny of the sixteenth century is one of the most hateful of
national memories, and no Christian has been allowed to land for
nearly two hundred years. Africa is only a coast-line : the
interior is unknown ; and the principal link between Christendom
and the Dark Continent is the slave-trade. South America, for
the most part nominally Christian, is sunk in superstition ; North
America. is Christian in a more enlightened sense : but .neither in
the Souih nor in the Nortli are there any serious efforts to
32 The Eighteenth CexTury and
Part II. evangelize the Bed men of the far interior, still less those towards
1786-1811. j-j-^g Arctic Circle or Cape Horn — though Europe has sent devoted
Chap^4. ]\j;oi.r^^vians to Greenland. The countless islands of the Southern
Seas are not yet touched, though a hand of artizan missionaries
has lately sailed in that direction. Such, in the closing years of
the eighteenth century, is the condition of God's earth ; and,
standing in thought in England at that date, we may add, Wlw
cares ?
The We have looked around : let us look back. "What has been the
Church condition of our Church and nation during this eighteenth
under the o o
Georges. CCntury ?
The century opened with some little promise. Notwithstanding
the virulent hostility of rival ecclesiastical parties at the time, the
Church was certainly not asleep. The two newly-formed Societies,
for Promoting Christian Knowledge and for the Propagation of
the Gospel in Foreign Parts, were just starting on their beneficent
career ; and, as we have already seen in our Third Chapter,
did, during the whole century, practically all that was done by
Enghshmen for the evangelization of the world. But after the
death of Queen Anne, and the advent of the Hanoverian kings,
there came a time of decadence and depression ; one may almost say
of despair, remembering that the great Bishop Butler refused the
Butler's Primacy because he thought it too late to save a falling Church,
^""^^ ' and penned that sad sentence in the Preface to his Analogy, " It
is come, I know not how, to be taken for granted by many persons
that Christianity is not so much as a subject for inquiry, but that it
is now at length discovered to be fictitious. And accordingly they
treat it as if, in the present age, this were an agreed point among
all people of discernment." The sneering attacks of the Deists
were indeed among the most formidable that the Christian religion
had encountered ; and although they were successfully resisted by
Butler himself, and Paley, and Warburton, and other doughty
champions of the faith, it must be acknowledged that the majority
of the clergy were led by the assumed necessity of arguing
against them to neglect the preaching of the Gospel altogether : —
" Men were pondering over abstract questions of faith and morality
who else might have been engaged in planning or carrying out plans for
the more active propagation of the faith, or a more general improvement
in popular morals. The defenders of Christianity were searching out
evidences, and battling with deistical objections, while they slackened in
their fight against the more palpable assaults of the world and the flesh.
Pulpits resounded with theological arguments where admonitions were
urgently needed. Above all, reason was called to decide upon questions
before which man's reason stands impotent; and imagination and
emotion, those great auxiliaries to all deep religious feeling, were bid to
stand rebuked in her presence, as hinderers of the rational faculty, and
upstart pretenders to rights which were not theirs. 'Enthusiasm' was
frowned down, and no small part of the light and fire of religion fell
with it.'' *
* C. J. Ahhej, English Church in the Ei'jhiecnth Century, 2nd Edn., p. 4.
THE Evangelical Revival
33
Indeed, many of the clergy, following Bishop Hoadly's Lati- Part II.
tudinarian views and even Dr. Samuel Clarke's openly-avowed 17H6-1811.
Arian opinions, wu'ote pamphlets to justify their nevertheless ^l^^P- 4-
suhscribing to what they acknowledged to be Trinitarian Articles conThTon
and foi'inularics. And meanwhile, numbers of thoughtful men °f ^^^^
were led astray by Hume, Gibljon, and Voltaire. ^^^^'
Blackstone's oft-quoted remark, that he had gone from church
to church in London, and that " it would have been impossible for
him to discover, from what he heard, whether the preacher were a
follower of Confucius, of Mahomet, or of Christ," though it may
give a somewhat exaggerated view of the actual fact, yet is most
significant of what the actual fact must have been. Nor were the
Nonconformists of the period any better. One of them, Dr. Guyse,
wrote, " The religion of Nature is the darling topic of our age ; and
the religion of Jesus is valued only for the sake of that. ... All
that is distinctively Christian ... is waived and banished and
despised." '•' Of the clergy themselves Bishop Eyle writes : —
'•' Tlio vast majority of them were sunk in workllincss, and neitlier knew
nor cared anytliing about their profession They neither did good
themselves, nor Hked any one else to do it for them. Thoy hiuited, they
shot, they farmed : they swore, they drank, they gamhlcd. When they
assemhled, it was generally to toast * Church and King,' and to build one
another up in oarthly-mindedness, prejudice, ignorance, and formality.
When they retired to their own homes, it was to do as little and preach
as seldom as possible. And when they did preach, their sermons were so
unspeakahly bad, that it is comforting to reflect that they were generally
preached to empty benches." f
This is severe, and perhaps it generahzes too much, and fails
to allow for numerous exceptions ; but what shall we say of
Boswell's statement to Wilberforce that Dr. Johnson, strong
Churchman as he was, had affirmed that he had never been
acquainted with one "religious clergyman "? :|: Dr. Overton,
though he balances the favourable and unfavourable evidence in
more neutral fashion than Bishop Eyle, yet gives actual facts '
which go far to justify Bishop Kyle's strictures, j Plurality and
non-residence, in particular, were colossal evils. Bishop Watson And the
of Llandaff held sixteen livings in different parts of England, bishops,
taking the tithes from them all, and employing a curate in each —
probably one of those who were " passing rich on forty pounds
a year"; and living, not in his diocese, but at Windermere, he
occupied most of his own time " as an improver of land and planter
of trees," thinking, as he himself said, " the improvement of a
man's fortune by cultivating the earth was the most useful and
honourable way of providing for a family." When only twcnty-
* Quoted by Kyle, ChrUtian Leaders of the La:<t Centurn, p. 16.
t ('In-istian Leaders of the Last Century, p. 17.
X Life of ^yilhcrforce, p. 423.
§ The English Churdi in the Ei<jhteenth Cenfnni, cliap. viii., "Church
Abuses."
VOL. I. n
34
The Eighteenth Century and
Part II.
1786-1811
Chap. 4.
Green's
picture.
Two
divisions
of the
Lord's
army.
seven years of age, he had been appointed Professor of Chemistry
at Cambridge, though he says himself that he "had never read
a syllable on the subject, nor seen a single experiment in it "; and
seven years later he was appointed Eegias Professor of Divinity,
whereupon, he writes, " I immediately applied myself with great
eagerness to the study of divinity." ''' This is the Bishop Watson
who wrote an .4|)o/o(/7/ /or the Bible, which led to George III.'s
remark that he did not know the Bil^le needed any apology ! One
example is perhaps sufficient. Dr. Overton gives many more.
Naturally the general condition of the people corresponded. Let
us quote Mr. Green's striking description of it : —
" In the higher circles ' every one laughs,' said Montesquieu on his visit
to England, ' if one talks of religion.' Of the prominent statesmen of
the time the greater part were unbelievers in any form of Christianity, and
distinguished for the grossness and immorality of their lives. Drunken-
ness and foul talk were thought no discredit to Walpole. . . . Purity and
fidelity to the marriage vow were sneered out of fashion. . . . At the
other end of the social scale lay the masses of the poor. They were
ignorant and brutal to a degree which it is hard to conceive, for the vast
increase of population which followed on the growth of towns and the
development of manufactures had been met by no effort for their religit)us
or educational improvement. Not a new parish had been created. Hai'dly
a single new church had been built. Schools there were none, save the
grannuar-schools of Edward and Elizabeth. The rural peasantry, who
were fast being reduced to pauperism by the abuse of the poor-laws, were
left without moral or religious training of any sort. ' We saw but one
Bible in the parish of Cheddar,' said Hainiah Mf)re at a far later time,
' and that was used to prop a flower-pot. ' Within the t( )wns they Avere
worse. There was no effective police ; and in great outbreaks the mob
of London or Birmingham burnt houses, flung open prisons, and sacked
and pillaged at their will. . . . The introduction of gin gave a new
impetus to drunkenness. In the streets of London gin-shops invited
every passer-by to get drunk for a penny or dead drunk for twopence." f
The great victory, therefore, which, by the instrumentality of
Butler, Warburton, and many others, the Church had gained over
the assailants of Christianity as a system, left her still helpless
before the more dangerous assailants of Christianity as a life, the
world, the flesh, and the devil. " Intellectually," remarks Dr.
Overton, " her work was a great triumph ; morally and spiritually
it was a great failure." |
Then came the Evangelical Movement, the leaders of which
flung themselves into the harder battle with sin and Satan. But
both divisions of the army of the Lord were needed. To quote
Overton again, — " Neither could have done the other's part of the
work. War))urton could no more have moved the hearts of living
* One is not surprised to find the sister University of Oxford expelling
Bix students for praying and readine; the Scriptures in private liouses; which
led to the remark that though extempore swearing was permitted at Oxford,
extempore praying could not be borne.
t Short History of the Euglislt People, chap, x., sect. 1.
t Fuylish Churcli in the Eightee)ith Century, chap. ix.
T}tE PA'ANGELICAL JiiVlVAt. 3?
masses to their inmost depths, as Whiteiield did, than Whitefield Part IT.
could have written the Divine Legation. Butler could no more ^'^^^'^^^l'
have carried on the great crusade which Wesley did, than Wesley ^^"
could have written the Anuloijii. But without such work as
Whitefield or Wesley did, Butler's and Warburton's would have
been comparatively inefficacious ; and without such work as Butler
and Warburton did, Wesley's and Whitefield's work would have
been, humanly speaking, impossible." '■^'^
In one short paragraph. Green thus describes the revolution
that ensued : —
" In tlic middle-class tho old piuty lived on unchaiij^ed, and it was
from this class that a religious revival burst forth, wliich changed in a
few years the whole temper of English society. The Church was restored
to life and activity. Religion carried to the liearts of the poor a fresh
spirit of moral zeal, while it purified our literature and our manners. A
new philanthropy reformed our prisons, infused clemency and wisdom
into our penal laws, al)olished the slave-trade, and gave the tirst imi>ulse
to popidar education."
This, however, is a compendious statement, which leaps over
long years of struggle. Bishop Butler wrote the sad sentence
before quoted in 1736. As we stand surveying the century in its
last decade, most of the triumphs of moral reform enumerated by
Green are, after sixty years, still in the future. Yet over those
sixty years we can look back with profound thankfulness. Seven
years prior to 173G, John Wesley had formed his little society of vvesiey,
praying friends at Oxford ; when that year opened he was on his "^^^^^^^^
voyage across the Atlantic to Georgia, whence he returned with &c.
new light as to his own sinfulness and inability to save himself,
and as to the all-sufficiency of Christ ; and two years later he began
that wonderful career of preaching and organizing which continued
uninterrupted for more than half a century. On Trinity Sunday
in that same year, 1736, George Whiteiield was ordained at
Gloucester, and preached his first sermon in St. Mary-le-Crypt,
which, as was complained to the Bishop, " drove fifteen persons
mad! " To these two great names, we must add those of Grim-
shaw, Berridge, the first Hciu-y Venn, Rowlands, Romaine, Hervey,
Toplady, and Fletcher of Madeley ; every one of them, be it re-
membered, a clergyman of the Church of England. To them, in
the main, was due, under God, the Evangelical Revival.
How was their work done ? Let Bishop Ryle reply : —
" The men who wrt)Ught deliverance for us were a few individuals, ^^^ ^
most of theui clergymen, whose hearts God touched about the same preached,
time in various parts of the coiuitry. They were not wealthy or highly
connected. They were not put forward by any Church, party, society,
or institution. They were simply men whom Cod stirred up and
brought out to do His work, without previous concert, scheme, or plan
They did His work in the old apostolic way, by becoming evangelists.
They taught one set of truths. They taught them in the same way,
* EiitjUsh Chitrch i,i the Eighteenth Century, chap. ix.
D 2
36 The Eighteenth Century and
Part II. with fire, reality, earnestness, as men fully convinced of what they
1786-1811. taught. They taught them in the same spirit, always loving, com-
Chap. 4. passionate, and, like Paul, even weeping, but always bold, unflinching,
and not fearing the face of man. And they taught them on the same
plan, always acting on the aggressive ; not waiting for sinners to come
to them, but going after and seeking sinners ; not sitting idle till sinners
oftered to repent, but assaulting the high places of imgodliness like men
storming a breach, and giving sinners no rest so long as they stuck to
their sins."
These striking words accurately sum up the features of the
movement, as revealed in biographies, memoirs, journals, letters,
and sermons innumerable. Bishop Eyle goes on to describe both
the methods of the evangelists and the substance of their preach-
ing. They preached everywhere : * in parish churches when
permitted ; " in the field or by the road-side, on the village-green
or in the market-place, in lanes or in alleys, in cellars or in
garrets, on a tub or on a table, on a bench or on a horse-l)lock ;
no place came amiss to them." They preached sivijjly, following
Augustine's maxim, " A wooden key is not so beautiful as a golden
one, but if it can open the door when the golden one cannot, it is
far more useful." They Tpreached fervently and directly. " They
believed that you must speak from the heart if you wish to speak
What they ^0 the heart." Then as to the substance of their preaching : it
preached. ^^„^^ above all things doctrinal, one may say dogmatical. They
believed they had definite truths to set forth, and they set
them forth definitely. They taught that men were dead in sins
and guilty before God ; that Christ died to save men from sin's
penalty, and lives to save them from sin's power; tliat only faith
in Him could give them His salvation ; that al)solute conversion
of heart and life was needed by all, and that the Holy Ghost alone
could convert and sanctify them. Standing in thought in the
closing decade of the eighteenth century, we find that the procla-
mation of these essential and fundamental truths has, by tlie
power of the Spirit, directly revolutionized thousands of lives,
and is indirectly and gradually revolutionizing the Church of
England.
But the revolution, we observe, is very gradual. Its force has
been minimized by its divisions. From the beginning of the
The three movement there were lines of cleavage. Three distinct sections
parties. among the men of the Eevival are easily traced. There were,
first, the Methodists proper, under John Wesley. They were
(//) The gathered into communities called the "Methodist Societies,"
Wesieyans although as long as Wesley lived they continued in at least a
loose connexion with the Cliurch of England, and certainly
repudiated the term " Dissenter." But notwithstanding Wesley's
* But to this there were exceptions among those whose names are given
above. Some of them worked only within parocliial limits; Romaine, for
instance. Bishop Eyle's words apijly rather to Woslpynnd Whitefield and their
followers.
THE Evangelical Revival 37
repeated decliinition that " if tlic Methodists left the Church he Part II.
would leave them," separation was really inevitable. Many ofl78H-18l].
the bishops were personally kind to Wesley, but the clerp;y _|^*2!l
generally could not abide either the teaching or the ways of the
Methodists. Itinerant preaching was of the essence of their
method, and itinerant preaching was regarded as utterly sub-
versive of the parochial system. In the last decade of the century,
in w^hich we are in imagination standing, the Wesleyan Methodists
(John Wesley having died in 1791) liave practically become a
distinct religious l)ody.
The S(>cond section were the Calvinistic Metliodists, under c^,'{^|]i^ists
Whitefield, with the Countess of Huntingdon as their great
patroness and in some respects virtual leader, who succeeded in
bringing many of the aristocracy under the sound of the Gospel.
A duchess -''might complain of Methodist preaching as " tinctured
with impertinence and disrespect towards . . . superiors," and
consider it " monstrous to be told she had a heart as sinful as the
common wretches " of tlie lower orders; Init still she did not
refuse Lady Huntingdon's invitations, nor did scores of the most
distinguislied denizens of the political and fasliional)le world. It
was the poor, however, who were chiefly reached by the preaching
of Whitefield and his associates ; and it was chiefly in their interest
that Lady Huntingdon built chapel after chapel for what in time
came to be called " The Countess of Huntingdon's Connexion."
She was, indeed, as reluctant as Wesley to be a " Dissenter ";
but undenominational preaching-halls were then illegal, and a
building could only be used for worship if properly registered ;
and as her chapels were not churches, they liad, to her vexation,
to be registered as " dissenting." Her preachers, however, were
all known as Methodists, wliich was a generic term and by no
means confined to Wesley's followers ; but the Calvinistic con-
troversy, which was conducted for many years with a bitterness
and rancour quite inconceivable even in these latter polemical
days, clave a great gulf between the two sections.
Then, thirdly, there was a section that clung steadfastly to the ^■) The
Church, and submitted to the limitations involved in so doing, cais. ^
To this section belonged Romaine, Venn, Toplady, Walker of
Truro, and many others. They were allied with Whitefield and
Lady Huntingdon in the Calvinistic controversy, against Wesley
and Fletchei'. Indeed Toplady was the principal antagonist of
Arminian views, and, it must be regretfully added of the author of
" Rock of Ages," one of the most bitter. The extreme predestinarian
views, however, of Toplady and Romaine were not held by Venn
and many others of the clergy of this section. But while they
were supporters of the IMethodist movement generally, they disap-
proved of tlie itinerant preaching which ignored the parochial
system and intruded even into parishes where, as in Venn's,
* The DuL'lic^s of I3uckiii;rliaiu.
38 The Eighteenth Century and
Pabt II. Evangelical teaching prevailed ; and though for a time they were
^rnf"^^^^' enrolled as members of Lady Huntingdon's Connexion, while it
^^" ■ w^as a Society within the Church, they withdrev*^ from it when lier
chapels were registered as " Dissenting places of worship."
As, therefore, we survey England in the last decade of the
century, we see that the Eevival movement, while it has done
God's work nobly in saving multitudes of individual souls, has
yet not leavened the Church at large ; and still less has it
leavened the regular Nonconformist denominations, the Inde-
pendents and the Baptists. There have been honoured names in
those denominations during the century, notably those of Isaac
Watts and Philip Doddridge ; but the great revival movement has
only influenced them indirectly. The Wesleyan Methodists are
organized on their own lines ; the Calvinistic Methodists — except
in "Wales, where they already form a distinct community —
correspond roughly with the numerous but iinorganized non-
denominationalists of a century later. The Evangelicals, properly
so called, ai'e but a small body, within the Church ; distinct
from either section of Methodists, though often called by that
despised name ; and totally distinct from the old Puritans of the
seventeenth century, though even that title is sometimes applied
to them. For, to quote Overton again,
" The typical Puritan was gloomy and austere ; the typical Evan-
gelical was bright and genial. The Puritan would not be kept within
ithe pale of the National Church ; the Evangelical would not be kept out
of it. The Puritan was dissatisfied with our liturgy, our ceremonies, our
vestments, and our hierarchy ; the Evangelical was perfectly contented
with them. If Puritanism was the more fruitful in theological literature.
Evangelicalism was infinitely more fruitful in works of piety and benevo-
lence ; there was hardly a single missionary or philanthropic scheme of
the day which was not either originated or warmly taken up by the
Evangelical party. The Puritans were frequently in antagonism with
' the powers that be,' the Evangelicals never : no amovuit of ill-treatment
could put them out of love with our constitution in both Church and
State." *
What, then, was really the condition of the Church in that
Were closiug decade '? Was Evangelicalism dominant, as is so often
gehcais"' carelessly afdrmed ? That it was growing in influence, and was
dominant ? indisputably the strongest spiritual force in the country, is true.
But it still represented only a small minority ; it was either
No, hated dcspiscd or hated by most Churchmen ; one bishop wrote,
despised. " Church-Metliodism is the disease of my diocese ; it shall be the
business of my hfe to extirpate it." f The report that one of
"the serious clergy" (as they were called) was appointed to a
parish was in many cases the signal for an outcry as great as if a
pestilence w^ere coming ; I Trinity College, Cambridge, declined
* Enrjlisih Church in the Eighteenth Centunj, chap. ix.
t See Hole's Early History of C.M.S., p. 53".
I See The Emjlisli Church in the Nineteenth Century, cliap. iii.
THE KVAyGRl.lCAI. REVIVAL 39
to receive their sons as undergraduates ;* Hugh Pearson, after- Part II.
wards Dean of Salisbury, narrowly escaped rejection by his ^^^^^"^l
ordaining bishop because he spoke favoui-ably of Wilberforce s __^
Practical View of Christianlti/ ; \ if the Bishop of London's
carriage conveyed a visitor from his house to that of a leading
Evangelical rector, it must put her down at a neighbounng
public-house, to avoid being seen to stop at such a clergyman's
door ; I and when Henry Martyn visited his native Cornwall after
his ordination, he, though Senior Wrangler and Fellow of his
College, was not allowed to preach in any church in the county
except his brother-in-law's. § The Bishops were continually
uttering warnings against "Methodists" in their charges, and
were careful to explain that they included under that name
the "serious clergy" within the Church. Not a few even
doubted their lovalty to the Government and the Constitution.
William Wilberforce relates the difticulty he had in re-assuring
Pitt on this point. From their great opponent, Tomline, Bishop
of Fjincoln, Pitt had learned to think them " great rascals,"
and even to question their moral character.il On the other
hand. High Churchmen, as the phrase would now be under-
stood—i.e. men of what are colloquially, however inaccurately,
termed "Catholic" principles,— had been few and far between
ever since the days of the Non-jurors ; but there was a small
body of them afterwards known as the " Clapton Sect," in contra-
distinction to the Evangelical " Clapham Sect," and because
some of its leaders lived at Clapton or Hackney, notably Joshua
Watson, the typical Church layman of those days. The vast who we-
majority of the bishops and clergy would perhaps be best de-
scribed, as to their teaching and general attitude, by the Scotch
term " Moderate." They were equally opposed to Eome and to
Dissent, and thev hated " enthusiasm " of any kind. The union
of Church and State, with the State practically ruling the Church,
was their ideal, one may say their idol. " Our happy Establish-
ment " was their favourite phrase. ^^^
Had the religious condition of the clergy and people improved church at
in the preceding half-century ? No doubt it had ; but abuses and t^he^end
scandals were still sadly rife. In the country districts few century.
* Jolm Venn was so rcfiised, "not that he was either dissolute or ignorant,
l.iit because he was the son of Henry Venn." Moule, Charles Sioiron, p. 60.
+ Private .Tournal of II. Venn the vounfjer, December, 1852.
+ " A near relative of t lie Bishop, after beinj,' a guest at Fnlliani Palace,
wa*s to visit Mr. Venn at Clapham. We were ourselves sent to wait at the
Bull's Head, 300 vards from tho Rectory, and to bring (he visitor round. The
Bishop could not'let his carriage bo seen to draw up at Mr. Venn's Rectory,
though it might be seen to set down a lady at a .-mall pubhc-house. thris-
tian Observer, January, 1S70. The writer is evidently Henry \ enn the
younger (the C.M.S. Secretary), who in 1870 was editing the Christian
Ohseryer.
§ Dr. G. Smith, Henry Martmu Y>- H-
ll Life of Wilberforce, chap. xii.
40 The Eighteenth Century and
Part II. attended church, and too many of the clergy were glad enough
1786-1811. when none appeared at all, and they were relieved from the
Chap. 4. necessity of holding a service. They were pluralists ; they
were keen sportsmen ; some of them drank heavily ; not a few
were openly vicious.* Pew of the bishops set a good example.
" We hear," says Dr. Overton, " strange tales of one bishop
examining his candidates for ordination in a tent on a cricket-
field, he himself being one of the players ; of another sending
a message, by his butler, to the candidate, to wadte an essay ;
of another examining a man while shaving, and, not unnaturally,
stopping the examination when the examinee had construed
two words." I The sermons of the day called forth the sarcasm
of Sydney Smith. " We have," he says, "persevered in dignified
tameness so long, that while we are freezing common sense
for large salaries in stately churches, amid whole acres and
furlongs of empty pews, the crowd are feasting on ungrammatical
fervour and illiterate animation in the crumbling hovels of
Methodists." Any "semi-delirious sectary," he complains, could
" gesticulate away the congregation of the most profound and
learned divine of the Established Church, and in two Sundays preach
him bare to the very sexton." \ Few new churches were built- —
only six in all London during the fifty-nine years of George III.'s
reign ; and great parishes like Marylebone and St. Pancras, with
populations even then of 50,000 and 60,000, had only one church
Evan- apiece. Meanwhile the despised handful of Evangelicals were
geiicai crowding their proprietary " episcopal chapels," multiplying
ments. Communions and communicants, introducing week-day services
and even the dreaded innovation of evening services, and lending
brightness to their worship by the use of hymns, to the horror of
the clergy generally, and even of so able a prelate as Bishop
Marsh, who strongly condemned them in one of his charges. And
William Wilberforce, solemnly called of God, as he believed, to
work for " the reformation of manners," was pushing the Society
he had formed for that purpose, despite the warning he had
received from a nobleman he called upon, who j)ointed to a picture
of the crucifixion, saying, "See there the end of reformers";
and followed this up by his great work, A Practical Victo of
Christianity, which immediately sold by thousands, and has since
gone through fifty editions.
The decade in which we are surveying the country was in other
* EncjUsh Church in the Nineteenth Century, chap. i. Even at a much
later period, the daily service in Chester Cathedral changed its hour in the
race-week, to enable the clergy and congregation to attend the races ! (Chris-
tian Observer, July, 1863, p. S-tO.)
t Ibid. The particulars of these cases are given in the Memoir of Bishop
JBtonifield, vol. i. p. 59. It there appears that the cricketer was not the
bishop himself, but his examining chaplain.
t Quoted in Thr Kn<ilish Churcli in the Nineteenth Century, chap. v. Of
coiir.se there were exceptions to Sydney Smith's sweeping statements. Bisliop
Porteus, for instance, had immense congregations at St. James's, Piccadilly.
THE Evangelical Revival 41
respects a dark and discouraging period. The Fiench Revolution Taut II.
tilled the British mind with terror and dismay, and all the more 17H6-1811.
because sympathy with it on the part of some who called them- ^^"
selves " patriots " led to open disaffection, the king being violently The
mobbed on his way to open Parliament, and the most inflammatory a°<J*"r\[^"
publications being actively distributed." Tom Paine's liujhts 0/ period.
Man leaped into popularity, while it was regarded by the majority
of sober citizens as subversive of the constitution. To subsidize
the Continental Powers that were fighting France, taxes were
heaped upon taxes, and the national debt rose by leaps and bounds.
In 1797 the Bank of England stopped payment, I and a mutiny on
board the fleet that was guarding our shores brought the country
into more imminent peril than it Ixiid incurred for centuries. All
this affected the Church seriously. On the one band, her position
was strengthened by the general desire to stand by all that was
stable and respectable in the national institutions. On the other
hand, the dread of any and every innovation, which was the
natural result of the alarm excited by the revolutionary excesses in
France, was a great obstacle to any new plans for the religious
improvement of the people.
It was at such a time as this that the little band of Evangelical
Churchmen began to consider their responsibilities regarding the
evangelization of tlie world. Let us now take our stand again in
the year 1796, and see who these men are and what they are
doing.
It is the second generation of Evangelicals with whom we have Second
now to do. All the leaders of the great revival movement arc of Efvan°"
dead. Henry Venn was the last to be taken. He is succeeded geiicais.
in the counsels of the brethren by his son John, Rector of
Clapham, a man of culture, judgment, and sanctified common
sense, well fitted to be the leader of the coterie of friends living in
his parish to whom by-and-by is to l)e given the nickname of the
" Clapham Sect." A nickname indeed, but one that will be held curham
in honour in years to come by many who have had no connexion ®"*"
with the " Sect " ; for the men to whom it is given are the salt of
the earth among the laity of the period. William Wilberforce,
the brilliant and fascinating M.P. for Yorkshire, ranking in Parlia-
ment with Pitt and Fox and Burke, and, through his intimate
friendship with Pitt, exercising no small influence on public affairs ;
Henry Thornton, the excellent and munificent son of an excellent
and munificent father, spending, like his father, an ample fortune
in doing good ; Charles Grant, of the East India Company, one of
the chief instruments in opening up India to the Gospel ; James
Stephen, the legal adviser of the Evangelicals, father and grand-
father of still better known men ; Zachaiy Macaulay, the devoted
* See Life of WiUicrfim-e, chap. x.
t A national subscription of two millions sterling was niisod to assist the
Treasury to pay the expenses of tlic war. Wilberforce subscribed an eighth
of his income.
42 The Eighteenth Century and
Part II. friend of Africa, who is presently to become editor of the Evan-
1786-1811. geHcal organ, — father, too, of a more famous son ; Lord Teign-
^P' ■ mouth, returned from the Governor-Generalship of India; — all
these belong to the " Sect."
A brilliant picture is drawn of this coterie of friends and fellow-
workers in Sir James Stephen's famous Essay on " The Clapham
Sect." " But still more graphic and life-like are the pictures of
The Mr. J. C. Colquhoun, in his delightful volume, Wilbcrforco and His
ci'apham. Friends.\ Henry Thornton, in 1792, bought a house and grounds
on Battersea Else, at the west end of Clapham Common. On the
estate he built two other houses, one of which w^as presently
occupied by Charles Grant, and the other by William Wilberforce ;
and these three friends, with Zachary Macaulay and James
Stephen, formed the inner Cabinet whence so many philanthropic
and Christian enterprises emanated. Let us read a few brief
fragments of Colquhoun's vivid description of a summer evening
in Thornton's demesne : I —
"The sheltered garden behind, with its arbeil-trees and elms and
Scotch firs, as it lay so still, with its close-shaven lawn, looked gay on a
May afternoon, when groups of young and old seated themselves under
the shade of the trees, or were scattered over the grounds. Matrons of
households were there, who had strolled in to enjoy a social meeting ;
and their children busied themselves in sports with a youthful glee
which was cheered, not checked, by the presence of their elders. For
neighbourly hospitality and easy friendship were features of that family
life.
" Presently, streaming from adjoining villas or crossing the common,
appeared others who, like Henry Thornton, had spent an occupied day
in town, and now resorted to this well-known garden to gather up their
families and enjoy a pleasant hour. Hannah More is there, with her
sparkling talk ; and the benevolent Patty, the delight of young and
old ; and the long-faced, blue-eyed Scotchman, § with his fixed, calm
look, unchanged as an aloe-tree, known as the Indian Director, one of
the kings of Leadenhall Street ; and the gentle Thane, Lord Teignmouth,
whose easy talk flowed on, like a southern brook, with a sort of drowsy
murmur ; and Macaulay stands by listening, silent, with hanging eye-
brows ; and Babington, in blue coat, dropping weighty words with husky
voice ; and young listeners, starting into life, who draw round the
thoughtful host, and gather up his words — the young Grants, and young
Stephen, and Copley, || a 'very clever young lawyer.' . . .
" But whilst these things are talked of in the shade, and the knot of
wise men draw close together, in darts the member for Yorkshire ^\
from the green fields to the south, like a sunbeam into a shady
room, and the faces of the old brighten, and the chikb-en clap their
hands with joy. He joins the group of the elders, catches up a thread
of their talk, dashes oft' a bright remark, pours a ray of happy ilhmiina-
* In hiB E$>inys in Ecclesiastical Biorfruphy. But the term " Clapham Sect"
seems to have originated with Sydney Smith.
t Longmans, 1867.
t J. C. Colqnhoun, Wilhcrforce and hi^ Friend.^, pp. 306—308.
§ Charles Grant. || Afterwards Lord Lyndhurst.
^ Wilberforce.
THE Evangelical Revival 43
tion, and f<ji a few moments seems as wise, as thoughtful, and as constant Part II.
as themselves. But this dream will not last, and these watchful young 1786-1811
eyes know it. They remember that he is as restless as they are, as fond Cliap. 4.
of fun and movement. So, on the first youthful challenge, away flies the
volatile statesman. A bunch of flowers, a ball, is thrown in sport, and
away dash, in joyous rivalry, the children and the philanthropist. Law
and statesmanship forgotten, he is the gayest child of them all.
" But presently when the group is broken up, and the friends have
gone to their homes, the circle under Henry Thornton's roof gathers for
its evening talk. In the Oval Library, which Pitt plainied, niched, and
fringed all round with books, looking out on the pleasant lawn, they
meet for their more su.staincd conversation. In this easy intercourse
even the shy Gisborne * opens himself. . . .
"Or they vary their sununer evenings by strolling through the fre.sh
green fields into the wilder shrubbery which encloses Mr. \Vilberforces
(lemesne, Broomfield, not like Battersea Rise, with trim parterres and
close-mown lawn, but unkemi)t, — a picture of stray genius and irregulai-
thoughts. As they pass near the windows that look out on the north, and
admire the old elms that shade the slopes to the stream, the kindly host
hears their voices, and runs out with his welcome. So they are led
into that charmed circle, and find there the portly Dean.t with his
stentorian voice, and the eager Stephen, Admiral Ganibier and his wife,
and the good Bishop Porteiis, who has come from Fulham to sec his old
friends, the Mores.
" Another evening the party cross the common, and drop into the villa
of the Teiginnouths, or spend a pleasant hour in Robert Tliornt(nrs
decorated grounds, to look into his conservatory full of rare plants, and
his library with its costly volumes. On Suiulay they take their seats in
the old church, with the Wilberforces' and Macaulays' and Stephens'
pews close to their own, and in the front gallery the Teiginnouths'; and
they listen to the wise discourses of Venn. Another Sunday they sit
enchanted under the preaching of Gisborne.''
Let us now leave Clapham, and come into the great metropolis e^?"- .
itself. At St. Mary Woolnoth, at the corner of Lombard Street, London,
is old John Newton, once a slave-dealer and immersed in the
grossest vices, now the venerated Nestor of the Evangelical
body, to whom Wilberforce, Thomas Scott, Cowper the poet,
Milner the Chm*ch historian, Claudius Buchanan, and Hannah
More, owe much of their spiritual enlightenment, and who (in
the language of his own hymn) has taught hundreds of less-known
souls " How sweet the name of Jesus sounds in a believer's
ear." \ At St. Anne's, Blackfriars, there is William Goode, wise
and patient counsellor and committee-man. Only two or three
other London parishes are in Evangelical hands ; but there
are licensed proprietary "episcopal chapels" with able pastors,
exercising a wide influence : such as St. John's, Bedford Row,
where Richard Cecil is still ministering, scholarly, refined,
brilliant,— " the one clerical genius of his party," Bishop S.
Wilberforce calls him ; or Bentinck Chapel, Marylebone, where
* Rev. Thomas Gisborne, of Yoxall Lodge, Needwood Forest,
t Isaac Milner, Dean of Carlisle.
X Jfr. Lecky calls Newton " uuc of the most devoted and single-hearted uf
Christian ministers."
44 The Eighteenth Century^ &-c.
Part II. Basil Woodd is surrounded by an influential and liberal congrega-
1786-1811. tion ; or the Lock Chapel (then near Hyde Park Corner), where
Omp^ . rpj^Qjj^as Scott is manfully preaching righteousness to an ultra-
Calvinistic people whose lives differ widely from their high
professions, eking out his miserable income by walking fourteen
miles every Sunday to give " lectures " in two other churches at
7s. 6d. apiece, and writing the great Commentary which crushes
him by the expense of its production, though its sale in the next
half-century is to produce half a million of pounds sterling.
And in the In the provinces there are by this time not a few faithful and
successful Evangelical clergymen, such as Rol)inson of Leicester
and Eichardson of York ; above all there is Charles Simeon at
Cambridge, still "boycotted" (to use a word not yet in the
English language) by both " town " and " gown," but " increasing
the more in strength," and laying the foundation of that unique
influence which will make him for forty years the most con-
spicuous figure in Cambridge.
These are some of the men of light and leading in the sparse
and scattered ranks of the Evangelical clergy and laity as the
eighteenth century draws to its close. Not a single Ijishop gives
them the slightest recognition beyond what he is officially obliged
to give.'"' Only one dignitary — Isaac Milner, Dean of Carlisle — is
counted among them. But the power of the Lord is with them.
They are not only, by His grace, bringing thousands of individual
souls out of darkness into light, but they are gradually leavening
the teaching of the Church, to such an extent that the doctrines
which they alone in 1796 are setting forth in Scriptural fulness
will, fifty and a hundred years later, although still hated l)y some
and ridiculed by others, be admitted, even in derision, to be " the
popular theology," that is, the theology wdiich is in fact the
religion of tlie English people.
* It is usually said that Bishop Portcus of Lonrlon was, if not an Kvan-
{^elical liiinself, favouiably disposi-d toi\'ardB them. Jle certainly joined them
in philanthroiiic enterpi'ii-es like Wilberforce's against the slave-trade ; and
lie manifested some religious sympathy with them. Probably he felt obliged
to be cautious.
CHAPTER V.
Africa and tuf. ]']AsT—]\'AJTiNa.
The Dark Continent -England and the Slave Trade— Granville Sharp,
Clarkson, Wilberforce -The Struggle for Abolition— The East
India Company— Religion in British India in the Eighteenth
Century —Charles Grant and Wilberforce —The Dark Period in
India Other Eastern Lands, Waiting.
" Thou wicked nvd slothful servant." — Matt. xxv. 26.
" The name of Clod is hlasphemed amonij the (lentilvs thromjh ijou." — lloiii. ii. 2k
TIEN the Evangelical Revival had reached the point to Takt IF.
which our last chapter brought it, Africa and India ^~,*|^''^!.^"
iiad waited two hundred years for Christian England ''^^'' '^'
to give them the Gospel. English intercourse and
tratiic with both the Dark Continent and the East
Indies had begun in the reign of Queen Elizabeth. In West
Africa, as we have before seen, the S.P.G. had one missionary,
for three or four years, in the middle of the eighteenth century,
and a Negro clergyman for fifty years following. In the Tamil
country of South India the S.P.C.K. had done a great work by
tlie agency of German Lutherans. That was all. Let us now
briefly review the connexion of England with both India and
Africa before the epoch of extended luissionary effort began.
Africa was then a Dark Continent indeed. Dark it is still ; The Dark
but dark it was a centmy ago in a sense we can hardly realize
now. For many years past, in successive editions of the Cliiirck
Missiouari/ Atlas, the article on Africa has commenced with
these words : " Africa has been described ' as one universul
den of desolation, misery, and crime ' ; and certainly, of all the
divisions of the globe it has always had an unfortunate pre-
eminence in degradation, wretchedness, and woe." Gleams of
light are to be seen now, here and there, athwart the moral
darkness ; yet those old words need little modification to-day.
P)ut when the Church Missionary Society was founded, Africa
was a dark continent in another sense. It was almost wholly
unknown. The coast-line had been traced by the Portuguese
explorers of the lifleenth century ; init although the course of
some of the rivers and the position of some of the lakes had been
fairly guessed at by Mercator, Ogilby, and other map-makers of
the seventeenth century, the more careful accuracy of the
46
Africa and tme East — Wait inc.
Chap. 5.
The Slave
Trade.
Part II. eighteenth century had discarded this guess-work, and in 1788,
1786-1811. the newly-formed African Association said in its prospectus that
nvimi ■^ Africa stood alone "in a geographical view " because it was
" penetrated by no inland seas, nor overspread with extensive
lakes like those of North America, nor had, like other continents,
rivers running from the centre to the extremities " ! The only
British traveller who had made any discoveries was James Bruce,
and his narratives of journeys in Nubia and Abyssinia had been
received with scepticism. Mungo Park was then on the travels
which in 1796 revealed the existence of the Niger, though its
course to the sea was not determined till 1830. That was all.
Very happily did William Jowett, the first Cambridge missionary
of the C.M.S., when considering the peoples and religions of
Africa from his watch-tower at Malta, exclaim, — "Even the
geographer, whose task lies merely with the surface of the land
and sea, confesses that all he has to show of Africa is but as the
hem of a garment ! "
Dark also, in a moral sense, was the connexion of England
with Africa. It is a humiliating fact that for more than two
centuries England was the chief slave-trading nation. She did
not indeed begin the detestable traffic. It was the Portuguese
and the Spaniards who first kidnapped Negroes, and carried them
across the Atlantic to provide labour for the early settlements in
the New World, l^ecause the Natives they found there proved
incapable of steady work ; and in the first decade of the sixteenth
century, a Papal bull authorized the opening of a slave-market at
Lisbon. But in 1562 an Act was passed by the English Parlia-
ment legalizing the purchase of Negroes ; and Queen Elizabeth's
famous naval commander, Sir John Hawkins, sailed at once to a
small peninsula in West Africa, named l)y the Portuguese Sierra
Leone, forcibly and fraudulently seized "three hundred Negroes,
carried them across the Atlantic to Hayti, and sold them there.
During the hundred years preceding 1786, the number of slaves
imported into British Colonies exceeded two millions. In 1771,
no less than 192 slave-ships left England for Africa, fitted up for
exactly 47,146 slaves. Slaves formed an important part of the
property of well-to-do families in England. Most people of
consideration had estates in the West Indies, and thence they
brought Negroes home as domestic servants. So late as 1772,
advertisements appeared in the London newspapers of black boys
and girls to be sold.^'- But it was in that year, 1772, that the
freedom of the slave on British soil was secured. Granville
* Here is the ailvortisemont of an auction :— " Twelve pipes of raisin wine,
two boxes of bottled cyder, six sacks of flour, three ne^ro men, two negro
women, two negro boys, one negro girl." Here is a bill of lading : — " Shipjjed
by the grace of God, in good order and well-conditioned, in and upon the good
ship Mam Borouiih, twenty-four prime slaves, six prime women slaves, marked
aiul numiiered as Iti the margin" — tiie marks being branded on a certain part
(if the \)oi]y. —The Lirerponl y'/'iruf.fM (London, 1897), quoted in ihe Times,
Dee-ember 4th, 1897.
Slaves in
England.
Afk/ca Axn THE East— IVaitikc, 47
Shall), then a cU'ik in a •^ovenHiient oHice, whosu sympathies had Part II.
heen drawn out by the sufferings of some Negro slaves who had IT'^ti-lsH-
hetii eruelly treated, had determined to test the legality of slavery ^^"^ ^•
in England ; and his unyielding perseverance, in the face of all
sorts of obstacles, brought the question, at last, to a plain issue English
before Lord Chief Justice Mansfield. On June 22nd, 1772, was ^^^^^^
delivered the memorable judgment which settled the controversy pounced
once for all. " The claim of slavery," said the Lord Chief Justice, ' ^^* '
" never can be supported. The power claimed never was in use
here, or acknowledged by the law. . . . As soon as any slave sets
his foot on EmjUsli i/ronnd he becomes free."
This judgment did not stop the slave-trade as between Africa
and the Colonies ; but it at once set free all the slaves in the
British Isles. The immediate result, however, was not good.
Claiming their liberty, they deserted their masters, and thensuddenly
found themselves without employment or means of subsistence ;
and the streets of London began to swarm W'ith Negro beggars.
Granville Sharp now turned his energy into schemes for their
benefit ; and it was in 1786 that, with the help of Government, sierra
Leone
he formed a plan for settling them on that very peninsula of Sierra coion
Leone where Hawkins had kidnapped the first British slave- founded
cargo. Four hundred liberated Negro slaves were shipped thither,
under English superintendence; and a district twenty miles square
having been purchased from a Native chief, the British flag was
hoisted, and the Negroes were planted out upon the land. Other
shiploads followed ; about a thousand Negroes came over from
Nova Scotia, \vhither they had fled from the United States ; a
good many English, farmers and artizans, sought their fortune in
the new settlement ; and the population grew apace. Disaster
after disaster, however, fell upon the colony : the Native chiefs
plundered it, and sickness carried off most of the English settlers —
which led to Sierra Leone receiving the sobriquet of the White
Man's Grave. To promote the safety and pi-osperity of the
people, the Sierra Leone Company was formed in 1791, to
introduce trade, industry, and Christian knowledge. Henry
Thornton was the chairman, and Wilberforce a director ; and among
the leading men were other magnates of the " Clapham Sect." But
further disasters ensued ; and in 1794, Freetown, the capital, was
destroyed by a French squadron, and the inhabitants treated with
merciless barbarity. Zachary Macaulay, father of the great
historian, was governor of the settlement at that time. A
previous governor. Lieutenant Clarkson, should also be men-
tioned, for his singular devotion and genuine piety."''
In the meanwhile, at the very time that Granville Sharp was
forming his first plans for sending liberated slaves to West Africa,
the University of Cambridge had propounded, as the subject for
* Lieut. Clarkson's Journal, ft touchiiig;ly interesting narrative, is pnhlished
by Bishop Inghain in liis Siena Leone after a Hundred Years (Seeley, 1SS»4).
48
Africa and the East — Waiting
Part II.
1786-1811.
Chap. 5.
Clarkson's
Essay.
WiUiam
V/ilber-
force.
His con-
version.
His dedi-
cation.
the Latin Essay of 1785, the question, " Is it right to make slaves
of others against their will ? ' ' The prize was awarded to Thomas
Clarkson ; and on gaining it he reflected that " if the contents of
liis essay were true, it was time that some one should see these
calamities to their end." He republished it in English, and it
became a classic in the controversy of the next twenty years.
Wilham Wilberforce, too, had begun his great campaign against
the Slave Trade itself. Even in his earlier years there had been
signs that God had marked him out to be the leader in the great
enterprise. " His abomination of the slave-trade," wrote a school-
fellow long afterwards, " he evinced when he was not more than
fourteen years of age." He wrote to the newspapers on the
subject while still a boy ; and even amid the gaieties of his
early adult life the sufferings of the slaves in the West Indies
oppressed his spirit. "In 1780," he afterwards wrote, "I
expressed my hope that I should redress the wrongs of those
wretched beings." But the youthful lover of freedom had not yet
entered into the liberty wherewith Christ makes His people free,
and did not yet see that the deliverance of the slave from earthly
bondage must, if any real good was to be done, be accompanied by
efforts, in the name and in the strength of the Lord, to deliver
him also from spiritual bondage. It was in 1785 that Wilberforce,
while on a continental tour with his friend Isaac Milner,"'' was
awakened by reading Doddridge's i?/sc and Pro^jrcss of Bel ig ion in
the Soul ; and on October 21st, in that year, it pleased God to make
His gracious promise of the Spirit to those that ask Him, in
Luke xi. 13, the turning point of the young statesman's life, and
by that Spirit to enable him to yield his whole self, body, soul, and
spirit, to the service of his Divine Master, f Then Wilberforce
advanced from feehng to action ; and it was in the memorable
succeeding year, 1786 — concerning which more will be said in
the next chapter, — that he wrote, " God has set before me two
great objects, the suppression of the slave-trade and the reforma-
tion of manners " — and that under the celebrated oak at Keston,
he devoted himself definitely to the campaign against the traffic
in human flesh and blood.
That Wilberforce was specially raised up by God for this great
work, no one can doubt who reads the long story of the twenty
years' struggle. Edmund Burke had formed plans a few years
previously for mitigating the horrors of the slave-trade and
ultimately suppressing it, but had given up the idea as hopeless.
No mere political movement could have accomplished it. " The
powerful interests with which the battle nuist be fought," writes
Wilberforce's son and l)iographer, " could be resisted only by the
general moral feehng of the nation. There was then no example
upon record of any such achievement, and in entering upon the
* Afterwards Doaii of Carlislo mid Prpsidcnt of Queens', Cambridge.
■|- But Wilborfoi-ce, tliouj;li undoubtodly foiivertod to God in October, 1785,
did not fullv realize his now state of salvation for some fi'w months. Seep. .'37.
AlKlCA A.VD THE EaST WAITING 4O
struggle it was of the utmost moment that its leader should be Part II.
one who could combine, and so render irresistible, the scattered 1786-1811.
sympathies of all the religious classes." This Wilberforco alone ^'^P- •'^-
could do, and did do.
It is important to distinguish between the Slave Trade and
Slavery. Slavery on British soil was declared illegal by Lord
Chief Justice Mansfield's judgment. Slavery in the British West
Indies was not touched by that judgment ; and its abolition was
not to come for half a century, and then not by Wilberforcc's
hands, but by Buxton's. Wilherforce's campaign, though inspired His anti-
by his distress at the sufferings of the West Indian slaves, was xrad^p
not against Slavery— for that the time had not come — but against campaign,
the Slave Trade.
At first it seemed to Wili)erforce and his comrades that the
abolition of the Slave Trade would l)e speedily decreed. They
had with them tiie sympathies of the three foremost statesmen
and orators of the day, Pitt, Fox, and Burke ; and Wilherforce's
intimate friendship with Pitt, who was then almost at the height
of his power as Prime Minister, gave him exceptional opportunities
of pushing the cause. They little anticipated the prolonged
struggle that was before them. They quite failed to estimate the
strength of the vested interests of a great trade. And it very soon
appeared that the walls of Jericho w'ould not fall at the first
trumpet blast. The slave-traders and slave-holders boldly dis- Opposition
puted the very facts on which the abolitionists relied. Yet the °rade."
horrors of the " middle passage " across the Atlantic were already
notorious. One example will suffice. A slave-ship with 5G2
slaves on board lost fifty-five by death in seventeen days. They
were stowed between decks under grated hatchways. They sat
between each other's legs, and could neither lie down nor in any
way change their position night or day. They were branded like
sheep with the marks of various owners, these being burned on
their breasts with a red-hot iron. Zachary Macaulay actually
crossed the Atlantic in a ship full of slaves, on pm'pose to sec
these horrors for himself. But " the trade " gravely affirmed that
the slave-ships were "redolent with frankincense"; that the
voyage across the Atlantic was the happiest period of the Negro's
life ; and that the involuntary convulsions caused by the heavy
irons on his body came from his love of dancing." They declared
that insubordination and crime would be the only result of milder
treatment. They raised the cry of " Property ! property ! " and
thus appealed to all the selfishness of British human nature.
And they hinted that the abolitionists were no better than the
* Tlieee actual statements, from the evidence given before the Parliameu-
tarr Committee, are quoted in the Li/c of JVilberforce, chap. vii. In 1788. a
slave-ship that was being fitted out in the Thames wn-? visited by some
membei'B of Parliamenr, and the result was an Act limiting tLe number of
slaves, which was passed at the very beginning of the controversy. But it
was totally disregarded, and never enforced.
VOL. I. E
Africa a.vb the East — Waiting
Chap. 5.
Part II. republicans who were then deluging Paris with blood. One
1786-1811. result was that Mr. Ramsay, a clergyman who had lived in the
West Indies, and spoke the truth concerning the traffic, literally
died under the distress caused by the calumnies which were heaped
upon him.''= Another result was that their audacious misrepre-
sentations were successful, year after year, in staving off the final
decision.
In 1789 Wilberforce made his first great speech in Parliament
on the subject, occupying three hours and a half. The Bishop
of London, Dr. Porteus, wrote that it was " one of the ablest and
most eloquent speeches ever heard in that or any other place,"
and added, " It was a glorious night for the country." The
slaveholders, however, succeeded in getting the motion deferred
till after the examination of witnesses ; which involved a post-
ponement to the next session. The collection and marshalling
of evidence involved immense labour, and Wilberforce's diary
shows that for months he gave nine hours a day to the task.
Entries abound like this, " Slave-trade — quite exhausted."
Zachary Macaulay, w^ho knew West Africa, and James Stephen,
who knew the West Indies, were his chief lieutenants, and
rendered important service. For three years the struggle went
on, and in 1791 the question again came before a full House.
It was at this point that John Wesley sent from his dying bed
his memorable message to Wilberforce, probably one of the last
things, if not the very last thing, that he ever w^rote. Encouraging
the young statesman to be an " Athanasius contra mundum," the
aged saint adjured him to be " not weary in well-doing." "If
God be for you, who can be against you ? Go on in the name of
God, and in the power of His might, till even American slaver}^
the vilest that ever saw the sun, shall vanish before it. That
He w^ho has guided you from your youth up may continue to
strengthen you in this and all things, is the prayer of your
affectionate servant, John Wesley." But on tliis occasion " the
trade " triumphed by a large majority.
The cruel attempt to identify the abolitionists with the infidel
followers of Tom Paine, on the ground that, like them, they
aimed at overthrowing property and civil order, had its effect
upon the mind of King George III., and he became their
determined opponent, as already were the Prince of Wales (after-
wards George IV.) and other of the royal dukes. This added
greatly to the difficulty of the position ; but Wilberforce, strong
in the righteousness of his cause, persevered year after year,
Wesley's
dying
message.
Hope
d ;ferred
* Wilberforce himself incurred great obloquy, and many stories to his
discredit were put in circulation by his enemies. On one occasion Clarkson
was travelling by coach, and the passengers Were discussing the slave-trade
question. " Mr. Wilberforce," said one, '" is no doubt a great philanthropist
in public ; but I happen to know that he is a cruel husband and beats his
wi^." In point of fact, Wilberforce wa? not yet married ! — Harford's
Rtcollections of Wilberforce, p. 141.
Africa and the East — Wait rye 51
although in 1795, in 1796, in 179H, in 1799, hu was beaten, Part II.
somotinu's in one way, sometimes in another. ITHfi-lsii,
Having thus brought Wilberfoice and his campaign to the close ^*'">'' ^'
of the century, let us now turn to India.
In the gradual "Expansion of England" as manifested in the
growth of the Empire in all parts of the world, an important part
has been borne by those voluntary yet, in a sense, authorized
associations called Chartered Companies. In the present work we
shall see something, by-and-by, of the influence, generally for
good, of tlie Hudson's Bay Company, the liritish East Afiica
Com))any, and the Hoyal Niger Company. The fiist led the way
to the greatness and completeness of the Dominion of Canada.
The second has given us the East Africa and Uganda Protectorates,
with all their illimitalile possibilities. The third, in preparing the
basin of the great river for the Niger Protectorate, has done
excellent work. So has the British South Africa Company, which
has already extended over vast regions the Pax Britannica. But
the greatest of all these associations has been the East India
Company.
On the last da} of the sixteenth century, December 31st, KlOO,
Queen Elizabeth granted a royal charter to " one Body Coi-porate
and Politick, in Deed and in Name, by the name of TJie Governor The East
and C oni pa nij of Merchants of London trading into the East Indies." company
So was born the famous "John Company," which for two hundred
and fifty-seven years represented Great Britain in India. " During
one half of this period it was a trading, and during the other half
a political and administrative organization ; while all through its
history, when it depaited from the i)rinci])les of toleration, it was
hostile to Christian Missions from a blinded selHshness. Yet it
was used by the Sovereign Puler of the lunnan race to prejiare
the way and open wide the door for tlie first hopeful and ultimately
assuiedly successful attempt, since the Apostolic Church swept
away Paganism, to destroy the idolatrous and Musalnian cults of
Asia." '■'■'■
The early agents of the Company were very different men from
the early " pilgrims " to the American Colonies. To the efforts
made to evangelize the Eed Men of New England there was no
parallel in India ; and the impression made by Englishmen on
the Hindu mind may be gathered from the oft-quoted words English
addressed to the chaplain who accompanied Sir T. Koe, the !"'«''s|«>"
Jiritisn Ambassador to the Mogul Enipi-ror,^ — "Cluistian religion
devil religion ; Christian much drunk, much do wrong, much beat,
much abuse others." Job Charnock, the founder of Calcutta and
first Governor of Bengal, became an avowed Pagan under the
influence of his Native wife, and after her death annually sacrificed
a cock upon her tomb. Civil and military officers kept their
• Dr. G. Smith, Conversion ofJndiu, p. S4.
E 2
;2 Africa and the East — Waiting
Part 11. zenanas, "where," as one described it, " they allowed their numerous
1786-1811. black wives to roam about picking up a little rice, while they
Chap. 5. pleased them by worshipping their favourite idol." The pages of
Sir John Kaye's Histori/ of Christianity in India teem with similar
illustrations — and worse — of the social and moral condition of
Anglo-Indian society in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
After this, it is a small thing to say that the East India Company
was eighty years in India before a church w^as built. When two
or three had been supplied, it became fashionable at Madras to
attend public worship twice a year, on Christmas and Easter
days ; and on these occasions the Natives crowded to see the
strange spectacle of Europeans going to " do pujah." The new
charter before mentioned, issiied by William III. in 1698, w'hich
required the Company to provide a chaplain in every garrison
and principal factory, and enjoined on such chaplains the
duty of learning the native languages, " the better to enable
them to instruct the Gentoos that are servants or slaves of
the same Company in the Protestant religion," produced little
effect ; ■■'■ and so late as 1795 Sir John Shore (afterwards Lord
Teignmouth), then Governor-General, reported officially that the
clergy in Bengal, " with some exceptions," were " not respectable
characters." "A black coat," he added, "is no security from
the general relaxation of morals." Some of them returned home
with large fortunes, made by trading and even gambling.
First Meanwhile, all through the eighteenth century, missionary
Missions. -(^yQj.]^ among the Natives was going on in the south of India.
It liegan, indeed, in Danish territory, but it spread both into
Native States and into the distiicts occupied by the Company.
This was the Mission founded by Ziegenbalg and Plutscho
under the auspices of King Frederick IV. of Denmark, and
subsidized and in great part directed by the S.P.C.K., as men-
tioned in our Third Chapter. But this was only in the Tamil
country. In 1758, however, Clive, whose victories really laid the
Kier- foundation of English supremacy in India, invited Kiernander,
nander. ^j-^g of ^\-yQ Danish missionaries, to Calcutta, and thus began
Missions in the North. In 1771, Kiernander built a church,
and called it by the Hebrew name Beth Tephillah (House of
Prayei'). It was generally known as the Mission Church, but in
later years as the Old Church. His labours, however, were
mainly confined to the poor Portuguese and Eurasians, from
amongst whom he gathered a small congregation ; a few^ adherents
won from Heathenism being also baptized. He worked well
according to his hghts, but the character of his teaching may be
Grant^.^ imagined from the fact that when Charles Grant, then a young
* Occasionally "black servants" v^ere bought, and then baptized and in-
structed ; and "Portuguese" (i.e. half-castes) in humble life were to some
extent cared for. The earliest recorded " convert," mentioned as far back as
1674, was, curiously enough, named John Lawrence. See an article in the
Madras Mail, July 21st, 1897.
Africa axd the East — Waiting 53
official of the Company, who had been awakened to a sense of sin L'^Rt IL
and of the just claims of a holy God, went to him in deep concern, ^^°^^-^**y-
-- " my anxious inquiries," writes Grant, " as to what I should do '_
to he saved embai-rassed and confused liim exceedingly ; and he
could not answei- my questions." His old age was clouded by
h(iavy pecuniary embarrassments, and his churcli in 1787 was
seized l)y tlie Sheriff of Calcutta in behalf of his creditors.
Then Charles (}rant,=- who had risen rapidly in the Company's
service, and held what was then the high rank of Senior Merchant,
stepped forward, and, in conjunction with Mr. William Chambers,
the Company's chief linguist, and the Eev. David Brown, a friend Dav^d^
of Charles Simeon's, who had come out as chaplain to the Military
Orphan Asvlum, purchased the church, and having vested it in
iheir three names, wrote to the S.P.C.K. in England to send out
a clergvman. (irant offering to pav him 3G0/. a year out of his own
])ocket.' The S.P.C.K. did (1789) send out a clergyman named
Clarke, who was really the fii'st English missionary sent to India ;
l)ut as he did not turn out well, and only held the post a few monUis,
lie is not usually counted. Not till eight years afterwards (1797)
did the S.P.C.K. succeed in finding a successor, and he, like the
missionaries in the South, was a Dane in Lutheran orders, Mr.
Kingeltaube; but, after a year or two, he joined the London
I\Iissionary Societv.t and the S.P.C.K. never sent a third man.
INleanwIiile David Brown had resigned his post at the Asylum to
take charge of the church on ('larke leaving ; and, except durhig
Kiiigeltaube"s tenure of the post, continued to minister to a growing
and intluential English and Eurasian congregation, without pay,
for twenty-three years.] He was also appointed a Company's
chaplain, and ministered for part of the time simultaneously in the
official church, St. John's; and he constantly attended the
hospital and the gaol. He never took furlough. In the wdiole
period he was only once absent, for a short trip up the Ganges.
" In the religious progress of the Evu-opean comnmnity," writes
Sir John Kaye,j "he found his reward. He lived to see the
streets opposite to our churches blocked up with carriages and
})alanquins, and to welcome hundreds of communicants to the
Supper of the Lord. He lived to see the manners and conversa-
tion of those by whom he was surrounded purified and elevated ;
the doctrines of his Master openly acknowledged in word and
* An extremely iutorestinp: sketcli of Charles Grant's career, by Jfr. Henry
Morris, lias been" recently jmblislied at Jladris by the Christian Literature
Society for India, and in London by the S.P.C.K. See aleo Dr. George Smith's
chapter on (irant in Tirrlve Indian St(ite--<inen.
t Uinfreltaabe afterwards be^-'i'i the f^reat work of the ljond<m Missionary
Society in Sonth Travancore. Thoiitjh a man of great devotion, he was very
eccentric, and after labouring for some years and baptizing many converts,
he suddenlv disappeareil in ISlo, and was never heard of again.
I The ciiurch continued in the hands of trustees till 1S70, when it was
handed over to the Church Missionary Society.
§ Christiiinity in Indin, p. 1(35.
54 Africa and tnf. East — JVArTiNC
Part II. deed, where once they had been scouted by the one and violated
1786-1811. \^y the other." The rehgious history of Calcutta during a quarter
Chap^5. ^1 ^ century is the history of David 13rown's life.
Plans of The three friends, Grant, Chambers, and Brown, together with
Br^wif"'^ another Company's official, George Udny,"'' formed, in 1786, a
large scheme for a Bengal Mission under Government auspices,
and submitted it to influential persons in England, as we shall see
hereafter. Nothing came of it directly, but it was one of the
causes which led indirectly to the establishment of the Church
Missionary Society. Grant, however, made a small beginning
himself by commissioning, at his own charges, a ship's surgeon
named Thomas to start a Mission at a place called Gomalty ; but
this scheme failed also.
Gi ait's Grant returned to England in 1790, and was at once in com-
influence. ij-,m^ication with William Wilberforce and other influential
Christian men regarding possible plans for the evangelization of
India. He published an able and elaborate pamphlet entitled
" Observations on the State of Society among the Asiatic Subjects
of Great Britain," which is characterized by Sir John Kaye and
other good authorities as one of the most statesmanlike papers ever
w^ritten upon British influence in India. He became a Director of
the East India Company, and was three times Chairman of the
Board ; and for many years all his energies were thrown into the
arduous work of supervising the government of the great Depen-
dency. Sir John Kaye thus writes of him : —
" The headpiece of the Company in Leadenhall Street, the mouthpiece
of the Company in St. Steplieii's, the oracle on all subjects of Indian
import, of that little knot of warm-liearted, earnest-minded men wlio dis-
cussed great measures of linmanity on Clai)ham Common, Charles Grant so
tempered the earnestness of his spiritual zeal with sound knowledge and
strong practical sense, that whatever he said carried a weighty signifi-
cance with it. Such a iiian was much needed at that time. He was
needed to exercise a double influence — an influence alike over the minds
of men of difterent classes in India, and of his colleagues and compatriots
at home."
And Dr. George Smith sums up his career in these eloquent
words:! —
" In the seventy-seven years ending 1823 Charles Grant lived, a servant
of the East India Company in Bengal, and then Chairman of its Coui't
of Directors ; a member of Parliament, and father of two statesmen as
pure as himself and only less able — Lord Glenelg and Sir Robert Grant,
Governor of Bombay. Charles Grant saw and mitigated the greatest
famine on record, which swept oft" four millions of beings in Bengal,
Behar, and Orissa, a century and a quarter ago. He purged the Com-
* In 1893, the Commissioner of Peshawar, a descendant of Udny's, and
bearing the same name, held a drawing-room meeting at his house at that
frontier city, which was addressed by the Author of this work and the late
Rev. R. W. Stewart.
t In an article in Qood Words, September, 1891; reproduced, in substance,
in Twelve Indian Statesmen, 1897.
Africa and the East — IVajt/ng -.^
pany's goveviinient of abuses at the worst period of its history. A friend Part II.
of Schwartz, tlie great niissionary, ho helped Carey to Serampore, he sent 1786-1811.
out the EvangeHcal chaplains through Simeon, he founded Haileybury Chap. o.
College, he was the chief agent * in the institution of the Church Mission-
ary and Bible Societies, he fought for the freedom of the African slave
as wisely as for the enlightenment of the caste-bound Hindu. He was
the authority from whom Wilberforce derived at once the impulse and
the knowledge which gained the first battle for toleration in the Hon.
East India Company's charters of 1793 and 1813. Above all, Charles
Grant wrote in 1792 the noblest treatise on the Asiatic subjects of Great
Britain, and the means of improving their moral condition, which the
English language has ever yet seen."
It was in 1793 that William Wilberforce, influenced by Grant,
first moved Parliament to afford facilities for Missions in India.
The East India Company's Charter had to be renewed, and he
proposed resolutions in favour of promoting the moral and religious 0;.^^^^^;.°^
improvement of the Natives. These resolutions were carried in f^rce.
Committee of the House, but before the third reading of the
Charter Bill the East India Directors took alarm, and the result
was that Wilberforce had in sorrow to write, " All my clauses
were struck out last night, and our territories in Hindostan,
twenty millions of people included, are left in the undisturbed
and peaceable possession, and committed to the providential
protection, of — Brama."
From that year, 1793, may be reckoned what has been well
called the Dark Period of twenty years in the history of Chris- The Dark
tianity in India, during which all possible discouragement was p^"° •
given by the East India Company to every eflbrt to spread the
Gospel. It is significant that, in that same year, Lord Macartney,
on his embassy from Great Britain to China, made the following
humiliating declaration : "The English never attempt to disturb
or dispute the worship or tenets of others ; they come to China
wnth no such views ; they have no priests or chaplains with them,
as have other European nations." Chaplains, however, there
were in India ; and we may thank God for them. During the
twenty years, all that was done in India, by the Church of
England, for the spread of the Gospel, was done by them, and
especially the famous " Five Chaplains," David Brown, Claudius
Buchanan, Henry Martyn, Daniel Corrie, and Thomas Thomason.
It is a curious coincidence that this same date, 1793, was
the date of Sir John Shore's accession to the Governor-General- Lord^
ship. For Shore was a godly Christian, who made no secret of his mo^"h.
personal religion, refusing to transact business on Sundays, and
getting churches built at the civil and military stations. But
more than this he could not do. To Wilberforce, who had written
to him about Missions, he replied that the English in India would
not tolerate them : indeed " they needed first to Christianize them-
selves." After four years he returned to England, became Lord
* Rather, " one of the chief agents.
56 Africa and the East — JVa/t/ng
Part II. Teignmouth, joined the Evangelical coterie atClapham, and, when
1786-1811. the Bible Society was established, was elected its President.
P" But meanwhile India continued — tvaiting.
Thus we have seen Africa and India waiting. But India is
The rest of not the w^hole of "the East." What of the rest of Asia? First
wai^ng!" there was the Turkish Empire. The Levant was not in those days
the scene of holiday tours. Few Englishmen had ever visited
Syria or Asia Minor. But the Lands of the Bible, where the first
Christian Churches had been planted, and in particular the Holy
Land itself, the sacred ground on which the Lord's own feet had
trod, were not forgotten by the few large-hearted souls that could
look beyond the bounds of their own parishes. Those lands,
however, were practically inaccessible. Mohammedan tyranny
ruled undisturbed. European Powers had not yet begun to inter-
fere in the East. It was but a few years before that the Turk
was thundering at the gates of Vienna. Moreover, in the closing
decade of the century, the Mediterranean was the battle-field of
hostile fleets. So "the East," in so far as it meant the Levant,
was still — waiting. But had it not, all this while, its own Chris-
tianity? Yes, the ancient Churches of " the East " still lived, and
had, through the wonderful providence of God, been preserved
through twelve centuries of Moslem oppression. But if alive in
one sense, they were dead, or all but dead, in another. Not one
of them was even attempting to win the Mohammedan to Christ ;
and, their presence notwithstanding, the Lands of Islam were still
waiting — waiting for an aggressive Gospel.
So also was it with Persia ; so with Tartary ; and as for Central
Asia, no one knew anything of it. Ceylon and the other East
Indian possessions of Holland had had a dull and formal Pro-
testant Christianity imposed upon them by their well-meaning but
unspiritual Dutch rulers. China, on the other hand, was the scene
of extensive Roman Missions, but the converts were scarcel}'
distinguishable from the Heathen, and had only exchanged —
painful though it is to state the actual truth — one idolatry for
another. Moreover, although, in the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries the Jesuits had contrived to get into the country, and by
their scientific attainments to maintain a position there, China, at
the close of the eighteenth century, was closed against foreigners.
Still more securely was Japan locked and barred against all inter-
course with the outer world. The great nations of the Far East
were still — waiting.
And in the heavens, the Lord of all these Eastern lands, the
Lord of the whole earth, was — loaiting. Nearly eighteen centuries
had passed away since He started His Church on what should
have been her career of world-wide blessing ; and while the
Church had corrupted herself, torn herself to pieces with
internal dissension, and at last gone to sleep, the Church's
Lord was still — waiting.
JOHN VENN.
REV. THOMAS SCOTT
REV. CHARLES SIMEON.
J^~^'
REV. JOHN NEWTON.
REV. RICHARD CECIL.
John Venn, Rector of Clapham ; First Chairman of C.M.S. Committee.
Ihomas Scott, Commentator ; Fir.st Secretary of C.M.S.
Charles Simeon, Incumbent of Trinitj-, Cambridge : Originator of idea of CM S
John Newton, Rector of St. Mary Woolnoth. " '
Richard Cecil, Minister of St. John's Chapel, Bedford Row.
CHAPTER VI.
The Missionary Awakening, 178G— 1709.
The Twelve Events of 1786-Charles Simeon—Carey— The Baptist and
London Missionary Societies — The Eclectic Discussions— Botany
Bay — " Simeon in earnest " — ^Josiah Pratt and John Venn- Why
form a new Society ?—L. M.S. not desirable, S.P.G. not possible.
" Wlien ve shdll sf-c tlicst' thini.is cauit' to ]>ass, ];iu>w that it i.-s '/i/;//i." —
St. Mark xiii. 29.
" WJiat Itarr J now dotn-? Is there iiot a cau.'^e?" — 1 Snni. xvii. 29.
N our Fourth Chapter we took a rapid sui-vey of the Part II.
World, the Country, and the Church, from the point 178(M«1J.
of view of the closing decade of the Eighteenth Cen- ^ '"^'- '*•
tury. Our Fifth Chapter show^ed us " Africa and the
East — Waiting," till the Evangelical Revival should
set on foot the forces for their evangelization. We must now
trace out the story of the Missionary Awakening, and particularly
the story of the Church Missionary Society.
The year 1786 was an epoch-making year in the history of The great
Missions. In that year twelve different events occurred, many of year 1786.
them quite unconnected with one another, but most of them
coml)ining to produce tlie Missionary Awakening which led to the
establishment of the Church Missionary Society, while others of
tliem were more or less connected with that Awakening.
(1) In 1786, William Wilberforce entered into the peace of God, J^^^^'^';
received the Lord's Supper for the first time on Good Friday,
solemnly resolved " to live to God's glory and his fellow-creatures'
good," and, as before mentioned, dedicated himself, under the
oak-tree at Keston, to the task of abolishing the slave-trade.
(2) In 1786, Thomas Cku-kson's essay against the slave-trade
was published, and began its work of influencing the public mind.
(3) In 1786, Granville Sharp formulated his plan for settling
liberated slaves at Sierra Leone.
(4) In 1786, David Brown, the first of the "Five Chaplains,"
landed in Bengal.
(5) In 1786, Charles Grant at Calcutta conceived the idea of a
great Mission to India.
(6) In 1786, William Carey proposed at a Baptist ministers'
meeting the consideration of their responsibility to the Heathen,
and was told by the chairman to sit down.
;.s
TiiK Missionary Awakening, 17S6 — i7qq
Chap. 6.
Part II. (7) In 1786, the lirst ship-load of convicts was sent to Austraha,
1J,^S-1^^1- and a chaplain with them.
(8) In 1786, the Eclectic Society discussed Foreign Missions for
the first time.
(9) In 1786 occurred the visit of Schwartz, the S.P.C.K.
Lutheran missionary in South India, to Tinnevelly, which led,
more than twenty years after, to the establishment of the C.M.S.
Tinnevelly Mission.
(10) In 1786, Dr. Coke, the great Wesleyan missionary leader,
made the first of his eighteen voyages across the Atlantic to
carry the Gospel to the negro slaves in the West Indies, an
enterprise afterwards joined in by the C.M.S. and several other
societies.
(11) In 1786 was passed the Act of Parliament which enabled
the Church of England to commence its Colonial and Missionai'y
Episcopate.
(12) In 1786, Dr. Thurlow, Bishop of Lincoln, preaching the
annual sermon of the S.P.G., advocated the evangelization of India.
" Can we," he urged, " withhold from so many millions of rational
beings, unhappily deluded by error or degraded by superstition,
the privilege of an emancipation from their chains of darkness
and an admission into the glorious liberty of the children of
God?" And he appealed to the East India Company to build
churches and support clergymen for them.
Some of these events have been noticed before. Some wnll
demand our attention by-and-by. Let us now take No. 5, with
Nos. 4 and 12, and then Nos. 6, 7, and 8.
It was a similar plan to Bishop Thurlow's that Charles Grant
had conceived, as before mentioned. Upon the Company and the
Government he relied for the propagation of Christianity in
Bengal. He, together with his three coadjutors before named,
David Brown, Chambers and Udny, addressed letters regarding
the great scheme for a Bengal Mission to the Archliishop of
Canterbury, and also to influential members of Parliament. The
two men in England, however, on whom they relied to push it
forward were William Wilberforce and Charles Simeon. Both
were young ; neither had yet gained their subsequent unique
influence ; but with an instinct in which we must see the guidance
of God, Brown, who had been Simeon's intimate friend at
Cambridge, and Grant, who must have heard of Wilberforce's
new fame as a religious man, fixed on the clergyman and the
layman who, above all others, w^ere likely to influence godly
people in England. Wilberforce has been already introduced.
Let us now introduce Simeon.
Charles Simeon, on first entering King's College, Cambridge,
had been aroused from a life for self and the world by the
summons of the Provost to receive the Lord's Supper ; and had
found light for his perplexed mind and peace for his quickened
conscience by reading Bishop T. Wilson's book on the Sacrament.
TifR Af/ssrONA RV A if a A'EJVf.vCr, 1786 — ijqq fq
During his undergraduate days he had gradually grown in the Part II.
Christian life, though meeting with not a single man who knew ^J,^^"^^\^*
the doctrines of grace. Just before his ordination on his fellow- ^^'
ship in 1782, he had come across John Venn,''' of Sidney Sussex
College, who became his life-long friend. He served as curate
at St. Edward's for a few months, at once ci'owding the church by
his awakening sermons, and then was appointed by the Bishop of
Ely, who was a friend of his father's, to Trinity Church. The
parishioners, alarmed at the advent of a " Methodist," locked the
pews and stayed away from church ; but the aisles w^ere soon
thronged by casual hearers. When he started an evening service
— an outrageous novelty in those days, — the churchwardens, to
prevent it, locked up the church. For years Simeon underwent
persecution of all kinds, from both town and gown ; but he always
said, " The servant of the Lord must not strive "; and his quiet
but unconquerable patience gradually won a complete victory.
This was the clergyman to whom Charles Grant and David
Brown sent from Calcutta their scheme for a great official Church
Mission to India.
The evangelization of India, however, was, in God's purposes,
not to come that way. It was the Dutch method of Missions, f
and it had been tried and found wanting. Not by the official
action of Government, but by the devotion of an obscure Baptist
cobbler, w^as a Bengal Mission to be established. Yet the letters
of Brown and Grant bore fruit. Nearly half a century afterwards
Simeon endorsed the original joint letter he had received from the
Calcutta friends with the words, "It shows how early God enabled
me to act for India, to provide for which has now for forty-two
years been a principal and an incessant object of my care and
labour. ... I used to call India my Diocese. Since there has been
a Bishop, I modestly call it my Province." | If it were only for
his having, at a time when godly clergymen were so soi'ely needed
in the Church at home, influenced such men to go out as Claudius
Buchanan, Henry Marty n, Daniel Corrie, and Thomas Thomason
■ — the other four of the " five chaplains," — India owes to Charles
Simeon an untold debt of gratitude.
The obscure Baptist cobbler was of course William Carey, ^j."^^*"
Carey owed his interest in the heathen world to the perusal of
Cook's Voyages ; but his spiritual fervour he owed, under God,
to Thomas Scott, afterwards the first Secretary of the Church
Missionary Society. Long afterwards he wrote, " If I know
anything of the work of God in my soul, I owe it to the preaching
of Mr. Scott." It was in 178G that he in vain invited his brethren
to give attention to the Lord's last command. " Sit down,
* Who had been excluded from Trinity College because he was the son of
one of the " serious" clergy. See p 39.
t See p. 19.
X This document, with Simeon's endorsement, is now in the possession of
Ridley Hall.
Carey.
6o The Missionary Awakening^ 1786 — I7q9
Part II. young man," said the chairman of the meeting ; " when it pleases
1786-1811. God to convert the Heathen, He'll do it without your help, or
Chap^e. i^iiiue." Although his first attempt to awaken a missionary spirit
failed, he went on praying and studying, learning Latin, Greek,
Hebrew, French, and Dutch. In 1792 he published his famous
Enquiry into the Obligations of Christians to use Means for the
Conversion of tJtc Heathen. In the same year, on May 30th,
he preached his memorable sermon before his fellow-ministers
at Nottingham, on Isa. liv. 2, 3, " Enlarge the place of thy tent,"
&c., dividing it under those two heads which have been an
inspiration to the whole Church of Christ from that day to this,
" (1) Expect great things from God ; (2) Attempt great things for
Baptist God." On October 2nd the first fruit of it sprang vip : the Baptist
^o^ig'ty"^*"^ Missionary Society was formed; and in the following year Carey
himself sailed for India as its first missionary.
Carey's enterprise also led to the formation, in 1795, of the
second great missionary society of that period. Its founders
were Dr. Haweis, Eector of Aldwinkle, and Mr. Pentycross, Vicar
of Wallingford, together with some Independent and Presbyterian
ministers, — not Baptists, and not Wesleyans ; and its basis was
undenominational. It was called simply The Missionary Society ;
but as, shortly afterwards, two Scotch associations were founded,
which were called respectively the Edinburgh and the Glasgow
London Societies, it quite naturally came to be known as the London
Socfet°y.^'^^ Missionary Society, and ultimately adopted that title. Its esta-
lilishment was hailed with great enthusiasm l)y a wide circle of
Christian people, which culminated when, in the following year,
the ship Duff sailed with its first party of missionaries for the
South Sea Islands. Although its constitution has always remained
unsectarian, it has practically, from the first, been the missionary
organization of the Congregationalists. No society has had greater
names on its roll : it may suffice to mention Morrison, John
Williams, Moffat, Livingstone, Ellis, Mullens, and Gilmour.
The two Scotch societies just mentioned were founded in 179G.
An attempt in the same year to induce the General Assembly to
take up Missions officially was not successful, despite Dr. Erskine's
memorable appeal to Scripture — " Moderator, rax me that Bible ! "
Let us now turn to the Evangelical leaders within the Church
of England. They had l)egun to consider the subject of Missions
Soctety*^ some years before. The Eclectic Society had been founded in 1783
discus- \^y a few clergymen and laymen, for the discussion of topics
interesting to them. They met fortnightly in the vestry of St.
John's Chapel, Bedford Row, of which Richard Cecil was then
minister. A missionary subject came before them for the first
time on November 13th in that epoch-making year, 1786, when
the question for consideration was, " What is the best method of
planting and propagating the Gospel in Botany Bay ? " " Botany
kir^B^tany ^^^ " ^^'^^^ ^oi' wliat wc HOW Ivuow as the Australian Continent,
Bay. and was a familiar name to the readers of the Voyages of Captain
The Missionary Awakening^ 1786 — 1799 61
Cook, by whom the Ccasteni coast of that portion of Aiistraha now Tart II.
called New South Wales had been explored. The new continent 1786-1811.
had been chosen by the British Government as a penal settlement, ^^^6-
and the first ship-load of convicts was, as above-mentioned,
despatched to Botany Bay ''•'■ in this same year, 1786. One of
Wilberforce's first efforts for the good of his fellow-creatures was
in their behalf. He and John Thornton interviewed Pitt, and
induced the young Prime Minister to send a chaplain with them
which circumstance was to Henry Venn the elder, then in
his old age, the token of coming blessing for the distant regions
of the earth. Throughout the world, he wrote on the occasion,
" a vast multitude whom no man could number should call upon
the name of the Lord." Though he, " stricken in years," would
not live to see it, he " would be well informed of it above." " All
heaven," he goes on, " will break forth in that song of praise,
Alleluia, for the Lord God Omnipotent reigneth." The first
chaplain was Eichard Johnson ; t his assistant and successor,
appointed in 1793, was Samuel Marsden, afterwards the Apostle
of New Zealand, whose heroic labours resulted in an abundant
fulfilment of Venn's prophecy.
In 1789, the Eclectic Society again discussed a missionary
subject, " What is the best method of propagating the Gospel in The Gospel
the East Indies ? " In the propounding of this question we see *^°''^"'''*-
the influence of the communications received by Simeon and
Willierforce from Brown and Grant ; but there is no record of the
discussion.
In 1791, a third missionary question was considered at an
Eclectic gathering, viz., " What is the best method of propagating
the Gospel in Africa?" — which carries us back to two other The Gosjei
of the events of 1786. The subject was no doubt suggested *^°'' '^'^''''^^"
both by Wilberforce's Parliamentary campaign against the Slave
Trade and by the then struggling freed-slave settlement at Sierra
Leone ; both which have been already noticed. Of this discussion,
again, no account has been preserved.
Not until 1796 did the Eclectic brethren again discuss Foreign
Missions ; and in the meanwhile the Baptist and London Mis-
sionary Societies had been founded. In the year that saw the
birth of the latter, 1795, Charles Simeon and other Evangelical
Churchmen were discussing at two clerical meetings at Eauceby
in Lincolnshire the possibility of using a legacy of ^84000, left to
the Vicar to lay out " in the service of true religion," in training
young men for missionary service. Nothing came of this,- and
* The name of Botany Bay long remained a synonym for a place of
pnnishraent, but the Bay itself -was soon superseded as a landing-place by
Port Jackson, a few miles north, now the magnificent harbour of Svdney.
t A curious and interesting Memoir of Richard Johnson has lately been
published, under the title of Austr'xlm s First Prencktr, by James Bonwick
(S. Low it Co., 1S98). His little-known history deserved to be ferreted out;
but the author might have spared his reflections on Marsden.
b2
The Miss ion a r y A wa kening, i 7 8 6 — 1 7 q 9
for the
World
Part II. the money was used, it is believed, for a similar purpose for the
1786-1811. home ministry ; but the incident shows that Simeon and others
Chap^e. ^g^.g ^Q^ forgetting the Lord's Command, though as yet the way
in which they could do their part in fulfilling it had not appeared.
But on February 8th, 1796, Simeon opened a discussion at an
Eclectic meeting on the question, " With what propriety, and in
what mode, can a Mission be attempted to the Heathen from the
Established Church ? "
The very form of the question marks a step in advance. No
longer do Botany Bay, or the East Indies, or Africa, fill up the
The Gospel field of vision. It is "the Heathen" that are thought of. The
Evangelization of the World is contemplated, however remotely.
And the mention of "the Estabhshed Church" indicates, what
was the fact, that while the brethren gave hearty God-speed to
the non-denominational " Missionary Society " lately founded,
and some of them contributed to it, they felt nevertheless that
the Church of England must have its own Missions.
Some particulars of the discussion have been preserved.''' Only
" two or three " out of the seventeen members present — pre-
sumably Simeon, Scott, and Basil Woodd — were favourable to any
definite attempt lieing made. The majority were afraid of the
bishops, or shrank from seeming to interfere with the S.P.G. and
S.P.C.K., or doubted the possibility of obtaining men, or urged
the claims of the Church at home. Nevertheless, the " two or
three" ardent spirits did not lose heart; and long afterwards
Basil Woodd wrote across his MS. notes of the discussion, " This
conversation proved the foundation of the Church Missionary
Society."
Three years, however, elapsed before action was taken ; and we
have only a few occasional hints that the great subject was not
forgotten. At Charles Simeon's suggestion, the clerical society at
Eauceby, above mentioned, and the Elland Society, which
supported young men of Evangelical principles at the Universities
with a view to holy orders (as it does still), were considering
the question ; and on their behalf the Kev. C. Knight, a leading
member, was in correspondence with the Bishop of London. Of
this correspondence the Minutes of the Elland Society (still extant)
give an interesting account ; but nothing came of it. Again, in
the Life, of Wilberforce we find the following two entries in his
journal : —
1797. July 27th. " To town, and back to dine at Henry Thornton's,
where Simeon and Grunt to talk over Mission scheme."
November 9th. " Dined and slept at Battersea Rise for mis-
sionary meeting ; Simeon, Charles Grant, Venn. Something,
but not much, done. Simeon in earnest."
* They were summarized in an Appendix to the Funeral Sermon preached
by the younger Henry Yenu (Hon. Sec. of C.M.S.) on the death of Josiah
Pratt. This Appendix is printed at the end of Pratt's Life. See also J. H.
Pratt's Eclectic Sfote-t.
Simeon in
earnest.
The 3fissioNARV Aivakexing^ 1786 — 1799 63
That dinner at Clapham on November 9th was more important in Part II
the world's history than the Lord Mayor's banquet at the Guildhall ^1^^'^^^}
,, • ■, . X Chap, b
the same evenmg ! ^__
It was in this year, 1797, that a young clergyman, lately come
to London as curate to Cecil, joined the Eclectic Society. This josjah
was Josiah Pratt, whom we shall often meet hereafter. His first Pratt.
religious impressions, as a youth at Birmingham, had come through
hearing the impressive reading of the Venite-'' by Charles Simeon,
then also quite a young man ; and it was the solemn utterance, by
Thomas Eobinson of Leicester, of the words, " Let us pray,"
before the sermon, that led to his conversion of heart to God.
On February 4th, 1799, he, the youngest of the Eclectic brethren,
proposed this question for discussion : " How far may a Periodical
Publication be made subservient to the interest of Keligion ? "
This discvission bore fruit. It led to the starting, two years later, of
the Christian Observer , which quickly became, and for three quarters
of a century continued, a valuable organ of Evangelical principles
and work. Pratt himself was the first editor, but was soon
succeeded by Zachary Macaulay. It is mentioned here, partly to
introduce Pratt, and partly because his proposal was immediately
followed, at last, by a reconsideration of the subject of Missions.
For on February 18th, 1799, the Eclectic Society once more
faced the question. There was, indeed, only what is recorded as
" a general conversation on the subject of a Mission connected
wdth the Evangelical part of the Church of England"; but it
issued in a notice for a more regular discussion on March 18th,
when John Venn himself would introduce the subject in the
following form : "What methods can we use more effectually to "What
promote the knowledge of the Gospel among the Heathen '?" ^g"."^
This again was a further advance upon the thesis of three }ears
before. The question was now not merely " What ought the
Church to do ? " but " What can loc do ? "
John Venn's wisdom and judgment are very manifest in the
summaries of his address which have been preserved.! He laid
down three principles : (1) Follow God's leading, and look for
success only from the Spirit. This was the primitive policy.
" The nearer we approach the ancient Church the better."
(2) Under God, all will depend on the type of men sent forth. A
missionary " should have heaven in his heart, and tread the world
under his foot." And such men only God can raise up. (3) Begm
on a small scale. " Nature follows this rule. Colonies creep
from small beginnings. Christianity was thus first propagated."
In applying these principles Mr. Venn deprecated beginning by
collecting money. Eather, let each member (1) admonish his
people to promote Missions, (2) pray constantly for guidance,
* The singint; of the Canticles, except by cathedral choirs, was a later
Evanselical innovation.
+ Notes by both W. Goodc and Josiah Pratt are printed in the Appendix
ciied in a previoas Note.
a new
Society
64 The Missionary Awakening^ 1786 — 1799
Part II. (3) study and inquire as to possible future plans, (4) speak to
1786-1811. Christian friends on the subject. Finally, the Mission must be
Chap. 6. founded upon " the Ghurch-inmciiAc, not the high-CJiurch prin-
cijjle"; and if clergymen cannot be found, send out laymen.
The remarks of Grant, Pratt, Simeon, Scott, and Goode are
also briefly recorded. Simeon, with characteristic directness,
proposed three questions : ' ' What can we do ? When shall we
do it? How shall we do it? " and answered them thus, (1) " We
must stand forth before the public " ; (2) " Not a moment to be
lost. We have been dreaming these four years, while all Europe
is awake " [with the excitement of the great war] ; (3) " Hopeless
to wait for missionaries ; send out catechists." Ultimately it was
Must form resolved to form a Society immediately. On April 1st, another
meeting was held to prepare the Eules ; and on Friday, April 12th,
1799, the public meeting took place which established the Church
Missionary Society.
But why .' But why was the new Society established at all ? Were there
not Church Societies already in existence ? And was there not
also a younger Society which, though not conducted by Chui'chmen
only, was one in which Churchmen could certainly, if they would,
exercise great influence? The answer to this last question is
found in John Venn's dictum that the projected Missions must be
based on the " Church-principle." It may be doubted whether
even his foresight could then perceive that while simple evangelistic
preaching can be carried on in common by Evangelical Christians
divided on Church questions, the non-denominational method
becomes impracticable when converts are being gathered into
communities ; but if not, it was a true instinct that led him to
the conclusion. A Native Christian community must either be
linked with an existing body or become a new independent body
itself. In the former case it cannot help following some de-
nominational lead ; in the latter case it adds one to the number of
distinct bodies that already divide Christendom. On the Con-
cTret^ational principle, the latter result is unobjectionaJDle ; Init
neither Presbyterianism nor Methodism accepts that principle, and
L.M.s. still less does the Church of England do so. The decision of the
desirable Evangelical brethren, therefore, not to throw their energies into
the new London Missionary Society, was inevitable. And not
only inevitable. It was not because they could not help it that
they formed a Church Society. With all their true love for the
ii-odly men outside the Church, and their large-hearted readiness
to unite with them in every religious and philanthropic enterprise in
which union did not compromise principle — as, for instance, in
the Eeligious Tract Society, founded in that same year, 1799, and
in the Bible Society, founded in 1804,— they nevertheless were
ex animo loyal members of the Church of England. They
thoroughly believed in Episcopacy and Liturgical Worship ; and
while no doubt, in common with Churchmen of all schools at that
tune, they set a higher vahie on " Establishment " than men of any
The Missionary Awakening, 1786 — lyqq 65
school do now, they were far too well instructed to imagine that Part ir.
the Church of England only dates from the Reformation. As we 1786-1811.
shall see presently, they looked back to the primitive Church for Chap. 0.
guidance in the details of their enterprise. One of their leaders,
Josepli INIilner, had but recently published his great History of the
Ciiurch of Christ, in which, while faithfully setting forth Evan-
gelical doctrine as the life of the Church, he showed the continuity
of the Church from the Apostolic Age downwards, and dwelt
lovingly on tlie characters and careers of the holy men of even the
darkest periods of mediaeval superstition.
The answer to the other question, Why did not the Evangelical s.p.c.k.
leaders throw their energies into the existing Church Societies, ^^^ ' ' '
the S.P.C.K. and S.P.G. ? is not fully seen in Venn's other dictum, possible,
that the projected Missions must not be based on the " High-
Church principle." There is more behind than appears on the
surface. The expression " High-Church principle " would, in the
present day, mean that missionary work could only be effectively
done by the Church in her corporate capacity, or by missionaries
of a Church holding the apostolical succession. But it is doubtful
whether Venn meant that. As stated in the previous chapter,
real High Churchmen were but few then. The S.P.C.K. and
S.P.G. had both been founded as voluntary societies, and though
the latter had a royal charter, it would be the extremest Erastianism
to suggest that a royal charter represented ' ' the Church in her
corporate capacity." Moreover the S.P.C.K. was at that very
time employing and supporting missionaries in Lutheran orders
in India, and rejoicing over tlie news of those missionaries them-
selves ordaining Natives after the Lutheran use.''' More probably
Venn meant two other things, viz., (1) that no Church enterprise
ought to be undertaken by individual clergymen, without the
bishops at their head, and (2) that every man ordained by a bishop
was ipso facto fit to be a missionary. If these two propositions
constituted what Venn meant by the " High-Church principle," it principles
is no marvel that he objected to it ; for (1) the question he pro- '^'^'^^''^'i'
])ounded to the Eclectic brethren was " What can tee do'?" — we
individual men of a despised school; and (2) the leading principle
he laid down was that all would depend, under God, on the
type of men sent out, and that God only could provide the
right ones. Here, in fact, we have the two essential and un-
changing principles of the Church Missionary Society, viz., (1) It
is the right of Christian men who sympathize with one another
to combine for a common object, (2) Spiritual work must be done
by spiritual men.
Apart, however, from all differences of opinion on points like
these, there was one suflicient reason for not working through
the S.P.C.K. and S.P.G. John Venn and several other of
his associates were sul)scribers to both Societies ; but at that
* See the quotation from an S.P.C.K. Report, ante, p. 23.
VOL. I. F
66
The Missionary Awakening, 1786 — 1799
Chap. 6,
Part II. time they had not the sHghtest chance of Ijeing permitted to
1786-18U. exercise any influence in the counsels of either. Ilhistrations
have been given in the previous chapter of the hatred and
contempt with M'hich the " feeble folk " of the still small though
increasing body of " serious clergy " were regarded by their fellow-
Churchmen. It is fashionable now to allow that they did good
in their day ; but all they got then was the barest toleration.
" Your fathers killed the prophets, and ye build their sepulchres."
In a letter written some years afterw^ards, Pratt stated that at this
time so exclusive a spirit reigned in the S.P.C.K. that although
he and his brethren were subscribing members, any offer of active
co-operation with a view to Missions would have been instantly
rejected; and mentioned the fact that "a most worthy man"
had been refused admission to membership because he was
recommended by Wilberforce ! ''•'- If, therefore, the Evangelicals
were to do anything at all for the evangelization of the Heathen,
they must act for themselves ; and this being so, they naturally
and rightly determined, under God, to work upon their own lines
and in accordance wdth their own principles.
It must be added that both the S.P.C.K. and the S.P.G. were
then at the lowest point of energy and efficiency. The zeal and
earnestness that had set them going a hundred years before had
almost died out ; and the wonderful vigour and resourcefulness
that have given both of them world-wide spheres of usefulness in
our own day had not yet been awakened The S.P.C.K. was so short
of funds that its India Missions were starved, and the Native
Christian communities were rapidly diminishing ; while the S.P.G.
was only able to keep up its grants to the Colonies by means of
the interest on its invested funds, its voluntary income being then
under £800 a year.f As we shall see hereafter, the S.P.G. owed
its revival in no small degree to the Church Missionary Society ;
not merely through the natural action of a healthy emulation,
but through the direct efforts of some of the Evangelical leaders.
In later times, owing to the rise of the Tractarians and their suc-
cessors, theological differences have become more acute ; and it is
inevitable that a Society which, on its own legitimate principle, is
as broad as the Church, should have some men upon its staff
* See C. Hole, 'Early HMory of CM. 8., p. 407. At a much later period,
between 1820 and 1824, Charles Simeon, when proposed as a member of the
S.P.C.K., was "black-balled," and he was only admitted siibsequently owing
to the personal efforts of C. J. Blomfield, afterwards Bishop of London.
(See Christian Observer, July, 1863, p. 536.) This was in the very midst of
the period when, according to most Church writers, the Evangelicals were
dominant !
"j" The S.P.G. had, however, a consid(>rable public position. When Edward
Bickersteth was a lad (probably in 1801), he was present at the Anniversary
Sermon at Bow Church in Cheapside, and was much impressed by the
equipages of the Lord Mayor and Sheriffs, who attended in state, and also by
the handsome carriages of the Archbishops of Canterbury and York and many
of the Bishops. Life of E. Bickersteth, vol. i. p. 6.
The Mis^ionarv Awakening^ 1786 — 1799 67
whose views and methods cannot be approved by most supportei'S Part II.
of the C.M.S. ; but this should not blind any of us to the magnifi- 17S6-1811.
cent work which, with whatever deductions, the S.P.G. has done '"P"
and is doing all round the globe.
But John Venn's address on that memorable 18th of March,
pei'haps without his seeing the full bearing of what he said, laid
down other important missionary principles. (1) "Follow God's John Venn
leading." This seems a trite remark ; but in the practical conduct pri^^ipies.
of missionary enterprise nothing is more important. It is one
thing to lay a large map on the table and say, " We will go here,
and we will not go there." It is quite another thing to watch the
indications of the Divine will, not moving till they are clear, but
when they are clear, moving fearlessly. Many illustrations of the
importance of this principle will appear in this History. (2) " Begin
on a small scale." This, again, seems a trite thing to say; but
experience has shown its value. Very likely Venn had in his
mind the virtual collapse of the London Missionary Society's first
expedition to Tahiti, attempted on too grand a scale, sent forth
with immense vclat, and furnishing even then useful lessons on
the vanity of hvunan plans — though it was so greatly blessed
afterwards. (3) "Put money in the second place, not the first;
let prayer, study, and mutual converse precede its collection."
Even at the end of the nineteenth century, we are only
beginning to see the bearing of this all-important principle.
(4) "Depend wholly upon the Spirit of God." This seems a
matter of course ; yet nothing is more often forgotten. The
Church is only slowly learning that fundamental article of her
Creed, " I believe in the Holy Ghost."
The full significance of Venn's utterances docs not appear ever to
have been pointed out before. Only fragmentary notes of them
survive, and these seem to have been regarded as merely of a mild
historical interest. We shall see presentlj- that the Eector of
Clapham was the author also of the Kules of the new Society, and
of its first Account of itself for the public. Justly does the
Society's Jubilee Statement (1848) describe him as " a man of such
wisdom and comprehension of mind that he laid down on that
memorable occasion, before a small company of fellow-helpers,
those principles and regulations which have formed the basis of
the Society," and upon which its work has been carried on ever
since. Truly the name of Venn deserves to l^e held in honour by The three
all its members. Henry Venn the First was one of the chief ^^""^•
leaders in the Evangelical Revival which necessarily preceded
Evangelical Missions. His son John Venn took a principal part
in building and launching the new Society. Henry Venn the
Second was afterwards, for thirty years, its wise and indomitable
Honorary Secretary and virtual Director,
F 2
CHAPTER VII.
Part II.
1786-1811,
Chap. 7.
April I2th,
1799.
The
" upper
The New Society and its Early Struggles.
April I2th, 1799 — The Men and their Plans — Waiting for the Arch-
bishop— Men, Money, and Openings wanted — The First Five
Sermons — Thomas Scott and Josiah Pratt.
" Wlw luith despised the day of small tilings ?" — Zech. iv. 10.
|E have seen the principles and olDJects of the founders of
the new Missionary Society. Let us now take up the
story of its birth and early years.
It is Friday, the 12th of April, 1799. We are in a
first-floor room in a hotel in Aldersgate Street, the
Castle and Falcon. It is not an unfamihar hostelry. In it were
held the earher meetings of the Eclectic Society, before they were
moved to the Vestry of St. John's, Bedford Eow. In it the
London Missionary Society was founded, four years before. And
the three windows of this first-floor room on the right will still be
pointed out a hundred years after as marking the birthplace of
the largest missionary organization in the world.
In this " upper room " are gathered, on this 12th of April,
sixteen clergymen and nine laymen.* The Rev. John Venn,
Rector of Clapham, is in the chair. The speeches are short and
business-like. All know what they have come for, and there is no
occasion for moving oratory. Four Resolutions are adopted. The
first puts the fundamental principle of Missions in the fewest
possible words : —
(1) "That it is a duty highly incumbent upon every Chris-
tian to endeavour to propagate the knowledge of the Gospel
among the Heathen."
Not " the Church," merely, be it observed ; but " every Chris-
tian." Then if the Church does not move, individual Christians
must move. Thus simply is justified the establishment of the
new Society. The second Resolution justifies it in regard to
another point : —
(2) " That as it appears from the printed Reports of the Societies
for Propagating the Gospel and for Promoting Christian Know-
* The list has often been given, but as some who were present soon with-
drew from the infant Society, it is more interestiro- I0 print the names
of the first Committee. Moreover, at this first meeting, some of tlie most
ardent leaders, as Simeon,'_Cecil, Grant, and H. Thornton, were not present.
The New Society and its Early Struggles ' 69
lodge that those respectable societies confine their labours to tlie Part II.
British Plantations in America and to the West Indies * there 17H6-1811.
seunis to be still waiitiiij,' in the E.sta])li.shed Church a society for Chap. 7.
seudiup; missionaries to the Cmitiniiit nf Africa, or the other parts
of the heathen world."
The next Eesolution forms the Society and adopts the Eules The new
subnutted:- f„°S
(3) "That the persons present at this meetin;^' do form them-
selves into a Society for that purpose, and that the followinj^^ rules
be adopted."
(In the original Minutes the Eules follow.)
Then a fourth Eesolution directs the first practical step : —
(4) " That a Deputation be sent from this Society to the Arch-
bishop of Canterbury as Metropolitan, the Bishop of London as
Diocesan, and the Bishop of Durham as Chairman of the ^Mission
Couunittee of the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge,
with a copy of the Rules of the Society and a respectful letter."
Then comes the election of the officers and committee. It is officers
resolved to request Mr. Wilberforce to be President ; but he proves mittee""^"
to ])e unwilling to take this prominent position in the infancy of
the Society, and he therefore becomes a Vice-President, along
with Sir E. Hill, 13ait., M.P., Vicc-Admiral Gambler, Mr. Charles
Grant, ]\lr. Henry Hoare, Mr. Edward Parry, and Mr. Samuel
Thornton, M.P. The Treasurer appointed is Mr. Henry Thornton,
M.P. The Committee chosen number twenty-four, as follows : —
Rev. W. J. Abdy, Curate of St. John's, Horsleydown, Soutliwark.
Rev. R. Cecil, Minister of St. John's Chapel, Bedford Row.
Rev. E. Cuthbert, Minister of Loug Acre Chapel.
Rev. J. Davies, Lectui-er at twt) London cluuches.
Rev. H. Foster, Lectiu-er at four London churches.
Rev. W. Goode, Rector of St. Anne's, Blackfriars.f
Rev. John Newton, ^.lector of St. Mary Woolnoth, liomhard Street.
Rev. Dr. J. W. Peeis, Rector of Morden.
Rev. G. Pattrick, Lecturer at two London churches.
Rev. Josiah Pratt, Curate of St. John's, Bedford Row.
Rev. T. Scott, Minister of the Lock Chapel.
Rev. John Venn, Rector of Clapham.
Rev. liasil Woodd, Minister of Bentinck Chapel, Marylebone.
Mr. John liacon, R.A., Sculptor.
Mr. J. Brasier, Merchant.
Mr. \V. Cardah , Solicitor.
Mr. N. Downe. , Merchant.
• It has sometimes been sa^gested that "West" here is an accidental
slip, and that "East" was jneant. But is this so? The S.P.G. had, even
then, some little conne.xion with the West Indies ; and althous,'h the S.F.C.K.
was supporting with its funds the Lutheran missionaries in the East Indies,
it is quite pn.ssible that tlio Hosolntiou did not refer to what was not strictly
an Knjilish Mission.
+ Properly St. Andrew-by-tlic- Wardrobe, witli which Si. Anne's liad been
united.
70 The Neiv Society and its Early Struggles
Mr. C. Elliott, Upholsterer.
Mr. J. Jowett, Skinner.
Mr. Ambrose Martin, Banker.
Mr. J. Pearson, Surgeon.
Mr. H. Stokes, Merchant.
Mr. E. Venn, Tea-broker.
Mr. W. Wilson, Silk-merchant.
It will be observed tbat of the thirteen clergymen, only four
were beneficed. Four had proprietary chapels licensed by the
Bishop of London. The rest were curates or lecturers. The
" serious clergy " had then few chances of being appointed to
livings, and it speaks much for the good sense of the bishops that
they were willing to license the proprietary chapels for Church
services. As for the lectureships, they were usually endowed
offices to which the parishioners had the appointment ; and a
good many Evangelical clergymen found employment that way.
Among the lay members, the most remarkable was John Bacon,
E.A., the celebrated sculptor,''' who, after executing so many
elaborate monuments, was commemorated, as directed by his will,
only by a tablet with the following epitaph : — " What I was as an
artist seemed to me of some importance while I lived ; but what I
really was as a believer in Jesus Christ is the only thing of
importance to me now." Mr. Elliott is notable as the father and
grandfather of distinguished children and grandchildren, among
them the two famous Brighton clergymen (E. B. and H. V. Elliott),
the authoresses of " Just as I am " ai'd of Copsleij Annals, and
Sir Charles Elliott, late Lieut. -Governor of Bengal. Mr. Jowett
was the father of the first Cambridge graduate sent out by C.M.S.,
William Jowett, who was 12th Wrangler in 1812. Mr. Wilson
was uncle to Daniel Wilson, afterwards Bishop of Calcutta.
Bacon, Jowett, andPattrick died very shortly, and Cecil resigned
owing to ill-health. Among the four who filled their places, two
should be mentioned, viz., the Eev. Samuel Crowther, Vicar of
Christ Church, Newgate, after whom was named, long afterwards,
the rescued slave-boy who became the first Bishop of the Niger ;
and Mr. Zachary Macaulay, governor of Sieri-a Leone, editor of
the Christian Observer, and father of the historian.
It will be observed that — of all men ! — Simeon's name was not
on the list. This was because, in those days of slow travelling, it was
essential that the Committee should consist of London men. But
soon afterwards twenty-six country members were elected in ad-
dition, among whom, besides Simeon, were Biddulph and Vaughan
of Bristol, Dikes of Hull, Fawcett of "Carlisle,! Melville Home of
Macclesfield, Robinson of Leicester, and Richardson of York, all
men of mark and influence.
* Bacon presented a silver teapot to the Eclectic Society for i..se at its
meetings ; which teapot is still preserved in the Chnrch Missionary Hoi.'se.
t Mr. Fawcett was the only one of the founders who lived to be present at
the Jubilee.
The New Society and its Early Struggles 71
What was the name of the new Society? The Resolutions Part II.
passed at the meeting did not give it a name ; nor did the original -^J,^^''"'^^J-
Rules. But six weeks afterwards a second General Meeting was ^^^" '*
held, at which the Rules were revised, and the name settled, The new
" The Society for Missions to Africa and the East." But this ^^^^^^'^
title never came into practical use. For some years the words
"The Missions Society," or "The Society for Missions," were
colloquially used. Gradually people began to add the word
" Church," to distinguish the Society from others ; but not until
1812 was the present full title formally adopted, " The Church
Missionary Society for Africa and the East."
It is not necessary here to give the original Rules. Suflice it to The Rules,
say that they made (as at present) every subscriber of a guinea (or, if
a clergyman, half a guinea) a member; that they provided for the
appointment of a General Committee of twenty-four, one-half of
whom wore to be clergymen (the rule making all su])scril)ing clergy-
men members of the Committee not being added till 1812) ; also a
Committee of Correspondence to obtain, ti'ain, and superintend
the missionaries ; and that they directed that the acceptance of
missionary candidates should be voted on by ballot. The present
Law XXXI. , "A friendly intercourse shall be maintained with
other Protestant Societies engaged in the same benevolent design
of propagating the Gospel of Jesus Christ," was No. XX. ; and the
concluding Rule, connnending the Society to the prayers of its
friends, was the same as the last Law now. There was no
provision for the appointment of Patrons, or of Secretaries.
Thomas Scott, who became the first Secretary, was appointed by
the Committee.
The next thing was to prepare a statement for publication ; and The Pro-
John Venn drew up a paper entitled A)i Account of a Society for
Missions to Africa and the East.-' This paper has one singular
feature. It contains no reference to what is, after all, the one
great reason and motive for ^Missions, viz., the solemn Commission
given by our Lord to His Church, and binding upon every
member. But it dwells impressively on the blessings of the
Gospel, and the world's need of them ; and it touchingly refers to
the condition of Euro2)e at the time, expressing the hope "that
since God had so signally defended this Island with His mercy as
with a shield. His gracious hand, to which, amidst the wreck of
nations, our safety had been owing," would be " acknowledged,
and His goodness gratefully recorded, even in distant lands." It
refers to the S.P.C.K. and S.P.G., notes the work they were doing,
and shows the openings left by them for a fresh organization,
explaining that the words in the title, " for Africa and tlie East,"
indicate that the new Society would not interfere with the S.P.G.,
whose principal field was North America. It also lays down
clearly the principle of " Spiritual men for spiritual work," stating
* One copy of the original Acccnnt is preserved at tlieC.M. House. It was
reproduced in fac-simile, and republished, in 188fj.
72 The New Society and its Early Struggles
Part II. that it would be the Committee's aim to recommend such men
"^Cht"^^?^' °^^^ ^^ "have themselves experienced the benefits of the Gospel,
^'^^' ■ and therefore earnestly desire to make known to their perishing
fellow-sinners the grace and power of a Eedeemer, and the
inestimable blessings of His salvation." It also has some remark-
able paragraphs on the proposed appointment of " catechists," or
as we sliould now call them, lay evangelists. It is explained that
men not fitted by education for English ordination might yet prove
good missionaries to " savages rude and illiterate," and it appeals
(with references to Hooker and Bingham) to the usage of the
primitive Church for authority to use such men as " catechists."
Lay missionaries do not need any apology in the present day ; but
at that time the proposal was a bold one, and, as a matter of fact,
such serious objections were urged against it by some of the
Evangelical leaders themselves, including even John Newton and
an ultra-Calvinist like Dr. Hawker of Plymouth, that it had soon
to be dropped altogether ; and in the Account as printed with the
First Annual Eeport some of these paragraphs have disappeared.
So strict were the ecclesiastical principles of men whom some
regarded as scarcely Churchmen at all.
blr'f^ce" ^ deputation, to consist of Wilberforce, Grant, and Venn, was
and the uow appointed to wait upon the Archbishop of Canterbury, and to
bishVp. present to him the Account and the Eules, together with a letter,
signed by Venn as chairman of the Committee. It does not
appear that the deputation was ever received by the Archbishop,
though the letter and papers were sent to him. His communica-
tions seem to have been with Wilberforce only. The letter did
not ask for patronage, nor even for permission to go forward. It
only stated that the Committee "humbly trusted that his Grace
would be pleased favourably to regard their attempt to extend the
benefits of Christianity, an attempt peculiarly necessary at a
period in which the most zealous and systematic efforts had been
made to eradicate the Christian faith." It was dated July 1st,
but not until the end of August did Wilberforce succeed in seeing
the Archbishop, whom he reported as " appearing to be favourably
disposed," but " cautious not to commit himself." But the other
bishops had to be consulted, and in those days such a consultation
was not easily managed ; and not until nearly a year afterwards,
on July 24th, 1800, was Wilberforce able to communicate the
result to the Committee. He wrote : —
" I have had an interview with the Archbishop, who has spoken in
very obliging terms, and expressed himself concerning your Society in
as favourable a way as could be well expected. I will tell you more at
large when we meet, what passed between us. Meanwhile, I will just
state that his Grace regretted that he could not with propriety at once
express his full concurrence and approbation of an endeavour in behalf
of an object he had deeply at heart. He acquiesced in the hope I
expressed, that the Society might go forward, being assured he would
look on the proceedings with candour, and that it would give him
pleasure to find them such as he could approve."
The New Society and its Early Struggles 73
What Wilbcrforce did tell Venn further when they met seems Part ir.
only traceable in a speech and a letter of Pratt's some years l7H(j-i«ii.
later. The Archbishop and the Bishop of London, said Pratt, ^^'^P- 7.
" encouraged us to proceed, and promised to regard our pro-
ceedings with kindness, and to afford us countenance and
protection when our proceedings should have attained such
maturity as to commend themselves to their approbation."
Meanwhile, during the waiting-time, the Committee had been Committee
meeting regularly, in Mr. Goode's study at St. Anne's Eectory on ""^^^'^s^-
St. Andrew's Hill. Indeed that study remained their meeting-
place for twelve years, a fact afterwards commemorated by a
tablet on the chimney-piece, which may be seen there to this
day.- But, pending the Archbishop's reply, the members had
little business to transact. They corresponded with friends in the
country ; they formed the nucleus of a library ; and in their
private capacity they subscribed one hundred guineas for the
London INIissionary Society as a mark of symixithy when its
missionary ship the Dtiffwds captured by the French.
When at length the Archbishop's reply througli Will)erforce
was received, the Committee met to consider it. Some members
thought the encouragement it gave too slight to proceed upon,
but Venn and Scott took a more hopeful and courageous
view, and ultimately the decisive resolution was adopted, "That
in consequence of the answer from the Metropolitan, the Com-
mittee do noiv proceed in their great design with all the activitij
p)ossible." I
Three requisites for the Society's work had now to be sought j[]y^<=.
for, viz., men, money, and openings for Missions. As regards "a)^Men,
men, sympathizing clergymen in all jsarts of England were
written to, but not one gave much hope of likely candidates. Mr.
Jones of Creaton knew of one young shopman, " a staunch
episcopalian, somewhat contemptuous of Dissenters, and aiming at
ordination," and doubted if he would do. Mr. Fawcett of Carlisle
knew two " apparently suited," but " could it be right to break the
hearts of their mothers?" Mr. Dikes of Hull knew no one.
Mr. Powley of Dewsbury knew no one. Mr. Vaughan of Bristol
knew no one. Dr. Hawker of Plymouth protested against
* A photoj^rapli of ilio room, sliowiiig tlic tahlet, hangs in tlio CM. House ;
and a reproduction of it will be found at page SO.
t There was also an answer from the S.P.C.K. The Minutes of that
Society for November 4tli, 1800, include tlio following entry : — " Head a
letter from the Rev. Tlios. Scott, Secretary to a ' Society for Mis.sions to
Africa and tlie East,' dated the 3rd inst., which had accompanied a present
to the Poard of fifty co])ios of an account of tliat Society, and in which he
expressed a ho]io that tlieir additional institution will be considered as a
sincere though fcel)le coadjutor, in tlie great and arduous attempt of pro-
moting Christianity through the nations of tlie Earth, and will accordingly
be htoked upon by this Society with a favourable eye. Agreed that the
thanks of this Society be returned to that Society for this mark of their
attention."
74 The New Society and its Early Struggles
Part II. sending out laymen at all even if they could be found. Simeon
1786-1811. had sounded the " serious men " at Cambridge, but was sorry to
Ghap^7. gg^y ihdX not one responded with " Here am I, send me," and
added, " I see more and more TF/io it is that must thrust out
labourers into His harvest."
(i) Money, Money, naturally, was not much wanted until men had been
found ; but the first two donations were given at the very first
meeting, £100 each from Mr. Ambrose Martin, the banker, and Mr.
Wolff, the Danish Consul-General. The first published contribu-
tion list, which is for two years, comprises also donations of £50
from "Wilberforce and three Thorntons, and various other dona-
tions and subscriptions, amounting to £912 altogether : against
which the only expenditure was £95 for printing. Several of the
country clergy wrote that the distress was so great, owing to the
war and bad harvests, that no money could be spared from the
relief of the starving. "High prices, taxes, and the condition of
the poor," wrote Vaughan of Bristol, "bring extraordinary
demands on every one."
(r) Fields Meanwhile the third requisite for missionary work, openings,
was engaging the careful attention of the Committee. West
Africa, as already mentioned, was prominent in their thoughts ;
but other fields were considered, including Ceylon, China, Tartary,
and Persia, and the great Arabic-speaking peoples of the Bast.
Suggestions were also made by friends that the Society might
undertake the enlightenment of the Greek Church, and that it
might ransom Circassian slaves in the Eussian territories near the
Caspian Sea, with a view to teaching them Christianity ; but the
Committee did not take kindly to either of these proposals.
Meanwhile, in the absence of missionaries, they fell back upon
the printing-press as an agent of evangelization ; and the earliest
practical steps taken after the receipt of the Archbishop's com-
munication were in that direction. Plans were formed for the
preparation of a version of the New Testament in Persian ; and
of a grammar and vocabulary and simple tracts, in the Susoo
language ; and a grant was made to the Professor of Arabic at
Cambridge, Mr. Carlyle, to assist him in producing the Scriptures
in that language. An interesting memorandum by him on the
subject is appended to the Society's first Annual Eeport. So also
are copious extracts from a pamphlet on the possibility of pro-
ducing the Scriptures in Chinese, which had been written by a
dissenting minister named Moseley. This pamphlet called atten-
tion to a manuscript, containing portions of the New Testament
in Chinese, which had lain unnoticed for sixty years in the
British Museum. The prosecution of this work was soon after-
wards handed over by the infant Society to the S.P.C.K. ; the
Committee "being confident that in consequence of the superior
funds of that Society, and the rank, talents, and influence of many
of its members," the scheme might by them " be more completely
carried into execution." The S.P.C.K., however, soon afterwards
The New Society and its Early Struggles 75
resigned the work into the hands of a still younger organization, Part II.
which at this time was not yet founded, viz., the British a-'^d n86-18n.
Foreign Bible Society. 1
We now come to the Society's first Anniversary. This was two Mistake of
years after its foundation ; for pending the Archbishop's reply, °^^^-
no public demonstration could be made. A curious consequence
ensued. The first Anniversary being in 1801, and the second in
1802, and the tenth in 1810, and so on, a general impression came
to prevail that the Society was one year old in 1801, two years old
in 1802, ten years old in 1810, and so on, and therefore that the
date of its foundation was 1800. This mistaken idea was actually
perpetuated for many years in official documents ; and the earliest
reference to the true date that Mr. Hole has been able to find
occurs in the appendix to Mr. Venn's funeral sermon on Josiah
Pratt in 1844. Not till the period of the Jubilee did the title-page
of the Annual Eeport give the fact correctly.
The early Anniversaries were different indeed in character from The early
those of later years. The Sermon was the principal thing ; the sa"res?'^'
Meeting was quite secondary, so far as public interest was
concerned. Almost from the first, it was de rujueur for men
and women from the few Evangelical congregations in London
to hear the Sermon, which was preached in the forenoon. The
Meeting immediately followed it, and consisted of the members of
Committee and a few other subscribing members ; all the names
being duly entered in the Society's minute-book. Men only
attended, just as they only would attend a political or commercial
meeting ; and the presence of ladies was not expected. -•= In fact,
the purpose of the INIeeting was simply that the members might
formally adopt the Eeport, pass the accounts, and elect the
committee and officers for the ensuing year. Great speeches on
these occasions were yet in the future. There being for the first
twelve years no President, a Vice-President or member of Com-
mittee took the chair. At the first Anniversary, John Venn
presided ; after that, it was always a layman. There was no
collection ; nor was there after the Sermon on the first three
occasions. At subsequent Sermons the contributions much
exceeded the usual amount at the present day. This is easily
accounted for. There were as yet no Local Associations, and
therefore contributors naturally put into the church plates
offerings which would now be paid to local treasurers. For the
first dozen years (after collections began) the amount averaged
nearlv £300.
There is much tliat is deeply interesting about these early
* It was thought quite improper for hulics to attend public meeticga
Some years hxter than this, a Bishop was publicly rebuked by a Baron of the
Exchequer for bringing in his own wife upon his arm ; and even so late as wl'f-n
Blomfield was Bishop of Chester, a few ladies who were admitted to an
S.P.(t. meeting in that diocese were carefully concealed behind the organ!
See Christian Observer, January, 1861, p. 40.
76 The New Society and its Early Struggles
Part II. Sermons. The venerable John Newton was invited to preach
1786-lSll. the first, in 1801 (two years after the Society's birth, as above
Chap^7. exj)lained) . After some hesitation, owing to his doubts about the
scheme for employing catechists, he consented ; but ill-health
prevented his fulfilling his promise, and, a few days before the
time, the Committee had to request their Secretary, Thomas
Whit Scott, to preach. The day appointed was Whit Tuesday, May
Tuesday, 26th, and the church St. Anne's, Blackfriars, Mr. Goode's. The
weather was unfavourable, and only some four hundred persons
assembled. That does not seem a failure, at eleven o'clock on a
week-day, considering the obscurity of the infant Society ; but
Scott no doubt thought the congregations of St. John's, Bedford
Row, and Bentinck Chapel, and the Lock Chapel, and Clapham
Church, and the half-dozen others likely to sympathize, would
have sent larger contingents ; and Mrs. Scott wrote to her son at
Hull, " We did expect a crowded church on this most important
occaision ; but alas ! our hopes were damped." In subsequent
years the " crowded church " became a fact ; and from those days
to the present, the C.M.S. Annual Sermon has never lost its
attractiveness. To preach it was once called by the late Bishop
Thorold " the blue riband of Evangelical Churchmanship " ; '■' and
certainly the list of the preachers is a list of the most eminent of
Evangelical clergymen during the whole century.
The first The first fivc preachers were Scott, Simeon, Cecil, Biddulph of
preachers. Bristol, and John Venn ; and it is interesting to read and compare
their sermons. Scott's, in the judgment of the present writer, is
incomparably the best. It is long, comprehensive, and admirable
every way. Simeon's is very short, less than one-third the length
of Scott's, and much simpler, but full of fervour. Cecil's is in-
cisive and epigrammatic, but scarcely bears out his reputation as
" the one Evangelical genius." Biddulph's is plainer, but has
impressive passages. John Venn's is more like the average
sermon of the day than any of the others, the first half of it being
of the moral essay type ; but it is valuable nevertheless. There
are features common to all. In not one of them is the Lord's
Last Command prominent. The leading thought usually is the
wickedness and misery of Heathendom ; and the motive chiefly
T. Scott's appealed to is that of pity. Scott's text is Eph. ii. 12, " Having
Sermon. ^^ hope, and without God in the world." He reviews the cruelty
and licentiousness of ancient Paganism, quoting Terence and
other classical authors in illustration, and affirms that African and
Asiatic Heathenism is no better. He refers, as do most of the
early preachers, to the question of the future state of the Heathen
who have not heard the Gospel — a subject that frequently came
up at the Eclectic meetings. Generally speaking, the preachers
do not dogmatize on the point ; but they urge that as we certainly
have no positive knowledge that the Heathen are saved, it is our
* And by Arclibisliop Magee, when Dean of Cork. See Chapter LIIL
The New Society and its Early Struggles 77
plain duty to try to save them. Scott deals in a masterly way Part II.
with the charge of " uncharitahleness " urged against those who 17«6-I8il.
feared they might be lost. Ciiap^?.
" Our opinions," lie says, " concerning the eternal condition of our
fellow-men will not alter that condition, whether we f,froundlessly pre-
sume that they are safe, or needlessly tremble lest they should perish
everlastingly." " Either they are perishing, or tlusy are not : and it is
very strange that lore should in this instance lead men to that very
conduct which, if adopted hy a parent towards a child even supposed to
oe in danger, would he ascriVjed to brutal selfishness and want of natural
aflectitni ! — and that malevolence should dictate those anxious fears and
expensive self-denying exertions which, in any case affecting the health
or temporal safety of others, would he looked upon as indubitable proofs
of strong affection and tender solicitude ! "
Continuing, he asks whether our Lord w^as lacking in "charity "
when He wept over Jerusalem, and whether the opposite conduct
would have been " benevolence " ; and he observes that, after all,
it is those Christians that are "uncharitable" who do the most,
not only to spread the Gospel, but to relieve temporal distress.
When Scott comes to the practical part of the sermon, he is
certainly less " straight " (to use a modern phrase) than mis-
sionary advocates would be now. Considering that no one had
yet offered to go as a missionary, nor that any likely person had
been heard of, his caution in disclaiming any desire to excite
"disproportionate and romantic zeal" seems rather needless.
He does quote Christ's command, and says that " no doubt " it
was still in force ; but this point is timidly set forth. Instead of
summoning Christians to evangelize the world, he only suggests
that " something " should be attempted. And he is careful —
rightly careful, and yet, at that time, perhaps unnecessardy
careful — to assure his hearers that faithful pastors at home,
" prudent and active men " who form and direct missionary plans,
business men who contribute money, and those that use their
influence and reputation to " patronize and protect their designs
against the opposition of worldly men," " are all serving the
common cause"; "nor would it be advisable to remove them
from their several stations, even to employ them as missionaries."
Still, he appeals earnestly for help in some form. " Let us," he
urges, "not merely inquire what we are hound to do, but what
we can do." Then he reviews the obstacles that will be en-
countered, and illustrates the power of the Spirit to do what man
cannot do by referring to " the impediments to cultivation from
snow and frost," which are "insuperable by all the power of
man," but wdiich are effectually removed "when the Almighty
Ruler of the seasons sends the warm south wind, wdth the beams
of the vernal sun." He then proceeds to argue that several
societies are better than one, but that they should work in
harmony ; that those who object that home work is more urgent
are not " the most zealous in bringing sinners to repentance and
7S The New Society and its Early Struggles
Part II. faith in their own neighbourhood"; and that zeal for the con-
1786-1811. version of the Heathen will certainly kindle increased zeal for
\^^ ■ souls at home.
Simeon's. Simeon's text was Phil. ii. 5-8, " Let this mind be in you, which
w\as also in Christ Jesus," &c.; and his main point is seen in this
question, " What would have been the state of the whole world,
if the same mind had been in Christ that is in us ? "
Cecil's. Cecil took Isa. xl. 3, " Prepare ye the way of the Lord," and
divided his sermon thus : the Moral state of the Heathen, the
Means of their recovery, and the Motives to attempt it. It con-
tains some very striking passages. For instance, referring to the
need of care lest "specious but unsound characters" should go
out into the Mission-field, he says that though "such carnal
Gospellers" may take upon themselves, like some at Ephesus, to
exorcise the evil spirits that possess the Heathen, the evil spirits
will probably reply, "Jesus I know, and Paul I know, but who
are ye? "■ — and they will " return from their rash attempt ' naked
and wounded.' " So again, " while the Sons of Earth, the slave-
traders particularly, entail an odium upon the veiy name of
Christianity," and "the Sons of Hell are endeavouring, and that
wdth horrid strides of late [alluding obviously to the infidel
measures of the French Eevolution] to root out the very remem-
brance of it from the earth," " may we," he says, " as the Sons of
God, ' in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation,' ' shine
as lights in the world.' " Once more : If any ask. What have we
to do wnth the rehgion of other nations ? he rephes, —
" Suppose the Heathen milUons to be sick, and this through a poison
Avliich was artfully introduced as a medicine, and which must destroy
both them and their posterity ; suppose also that any one had a specific,
and the 07il>j specific, which could reheve them under the efiects of
that poison ; I ask what notion the Objector would form of a person
who should Hve and die with this specific in his cabinet, crying ' What
have I to do with the remedies of other nations ? ' Would not he say,
' This Querist has either no faith in his remedy, or no feeli7iff in his
lieart ' ? "
Bidduiph's Much in the same way did Biddulph, whose text was the
"Golden Eule " in Matt, vh., apply that Eule. Imagining the
case of the Susoos being Christians and ourselves Heathen, he
thus speaks :
" Bring the matter home, my Christian brother, personally to your-
self. Faiicy yourself to he a poor Heathen, wandering in your native
woods, without any distinct knowledge of God, or any acquaintance at
all with a crucified Saviour, yet conscious of guilt, harassed by fear, and
destitute of all consolation under the certain prospect of death and a
subsequent state of existence. Now what would you wish tliat the
enlightened Susoos, enjoyhig your present advantages, should do to you ?
Let "conscience determine the part which you would have them to act ;
and tkis is the rule of your own conduct, when you again contemplate
yourselves as Christians."
J. Venn's. John Venn's text was 1 Cor. i. 21, " After that in the wisdom
The New Society and its Early Steuccles jq
of God," &c. He reviewed the vain attompts of ancient j)hiloso- ,?J^'^,4,Yi
phers to reform mankind — making', in a striking note, an excep- chap 7.
tion in favour of Socrates, — and tlien set forth the Gospel as the — 1
one remedy for human sin and woe.
The next four preachers were Edward Burn of Birmingham, others.
Basil Woodd, T. Kobinson of Leicester, and Legh Richmond.
Robinson was a very eminent preacher, and his sermon in 1808,
on Rom. x. 13-15, is one of the most powerful, and one of the
most finished, in the entire series. Its utterances were solemnized
by the death of Newton, and the paralytic stroke of Cecil, whicli
had lately occurred. Claudius Buchanan was the preacher in
1810. He was followed by Melville Home, Goode (the rector of
the church), Dealtry (afterwards Archdeacon of Surrey), and
Dean Ryder of Wells (afterwards Bishop of Lichfield). Some of
these sermons will claim notice by-and-by. All were delivered
in St. Anne's (or, more accurately, St. Andrew's, as before
explained). St. Bride's was first used in 1817.
Of these preachers, the two who were pre-eminently identified
with the earliest struggles of the Society were Thomas Scott and Scott
John Venn. Venn's remarkable wisdom in laying down the secretary.
Society's principles, drafting its rules, and guiding its first pro-
ceedings from the chair of the Committee, has already been
noticed. Of scarcely less value was the indomitable energy of
Scott. For three years and a half lie plied the labouring oar as
Secretary. Although active opei-ations had scarcely begun when
he retired, he was untiring in working out the preliminaries, and
his courage and faith again and again carried the day when more
timid counsels nearly prevailed. Scott's deeply interesting narra-
tive of his own gi-adual enlightenment and conversion to God is
entitled T}ie Force of Truth. Truth indeed has force ; and so has
character ; and the force of character in Scott was a distinct factor
in the development of the newly-born Society. He was deficient
in popular gifts ; he was in some ways, like John Newton, a rough
diamond; but, as W. Jowett says,''' " being endued with a strong
and capacious understanding, and possessing unwearied perse-
verance, he made himself a thoroughly learned man, especially
in theology " ; and as Dr. Overton says.f " he was a noble speci-
men of a Christian, and deserved a much wider recognition than
he ever received in this world." He resigned his Secretaryship
at the close of 1802, on his appointment to the vicarage of Aston
Sand ford, Bucks.
His successor was Josiah Pratt, who has l^een already introduced. Pratt the
Pratt was only thirty-four years of age wlien he was appointed |"c°etary.
Secretary, and he held office for more than twenty-one years.
The growth of the Society's influence at home, and tlie extension
of its work al)road, was mainly due, under God, to liim. For the
* C.M.S. Jubilee Tract, Founders and Fiixt Five Tears.
+ Englinh (')nirrh in the Einhtcfufh Cmtiiry, chap. ix.
8o
The New Society and its Early Struggles
Part II.
1786-1811
Chap. 7.
first nine years of his Secretaryship, his salary was £60 a year ;
then £100 a year ; and, from 1814, £300 a year. He had two
Sunday lectureships and one on Wednesday evenings ; but almost
the whole of his week-day time, often up till late at night, was
absorbed by the work of the Society ; and his house, 22, Doughty
Street, was for several years practically the Society's of&ce.
There he studied the needs of the great dark world, the possi-
bilities of its evangelization, the problems of so vast an enterprise ;
and there, as we shall see, he in after years compiled month by
month the current history of all its branches. There he thought
out, and prayed over, his plans for his own infant Society. There
he interviewed likely, and (more often) unlikely, candidates for
missionary service. There he wrote his long letters to Africa and
India and New Zealand, in days when shorthand-writers and
copying-presses were unknown, and when there were no mail-
steamers to carry his correspondence or bring back the answers.
There he bore the burden of what became a rapidly growing
organization; and there, in simple faith, he daily and hourly cast
his burden upon the Lord.
The study in St. Anne's Rectory, in which the first Committee Meetings
were held, showing the tablet on the chimney-piece (see page 73).
\Vhom
come mis-
CHAPTER I VTII.
The First Missionaries.
Henry Maityn's Offer -The Men from Berlin — Their Training — The
First Valedictory Meetings —The First Voyages out -The First
Englishmen accepted-Ordination difficulties.
" Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us ? " — Isa. vi. 8.
SEE more and more," wrote Charles Simeon, when Part TI.
all inquiries after likely missionaries only resulted in Jm^ '^i
disappointment, " 117/0 it is that must thrust out J 1
labourers into His harvest." These words, already fjo^
quoted in a previous chapter, indicate the gravest of
the difficulties to be encountered by the new Society, and indicate sionaries ?
also the true solution of those difficulties. It will be remembered
that the original idea of the founders, in their despair either of
finding ordained men willing to go abroad, or of inducing the
bishops to ordain men for foreign work, w^as to send out lay
" catechists." This plan fell through; and it pleased God to
show 117/0 could thrust out lal)ourers by sending them as their tirst
English candidate a Senior Wrangler and Fellow of his College,
who could be ordained on his fellowship. This, it need liardly be
said, was Henry Marty n.
Henry Martyn was Senior Wrangler and First Smith's Prize- ^^"[^n
man in 1801. It is interesting to notice that the Third and
Fourth Wranglers that year were Robert and Charles Grant, sons
of the Charles Grant wliom we liave already met as one of the
originators of India ^Missions and as one of the founders of the
Society. Robert, afterwards Governor of Bombay, is known to
us l)y his hymns, " Saviour! when in dust to Thee " and " Wlien
gathering clouds around 1 view." Charles (afterwards Lord Glenelg)
became Minister for India, in which capacity he sent the first Daniel
Wilson as Bishop to Calcutta. Martyn was ordained, and became
Simeon's curate, in 1803 ; but before that, in the autumn of the
previous year, he was in communication with the new Society.
The reading of David Brainerd's Life '•' had stirred his heart about
the Heathen, and shown him also the blessedness of a life of self-
sacrifice in the Lord's service ; and the news that kept coming to
Simeon of Carey's work in Bengal drew out his sympatliies to
India. Obstacles, however, arose to his going out under the
* See p. 27.
VOL. I. G
82 The First Missionaries
Society. Family losses and responsibilities made it impossible for
him to take the bare allowance of a missionary ; and besides this,
it would have been difficult even for Mr. Grant to obtain leave for
his sailing in an East India Company's ship with the direct object
of preaching to the Heathen. But an appointment as a Company's
chaplain was obtained for him ; and the Society's Eepoi't in 1805
stated that the Committee had " cheerfully acquiesced, as the
appointment was of considerable importance," and might " ulti-
mately lead, under God, to considerable influence among the
Heathen." He sailed for India in 1805, laboured untiringly for
six years in such work as was possible, then journeyed to Persia
in failing health, suffered there for a year the bitter enmity of the
Mohammedan moulvies, and, on his way home thence, yielded up
his heroic spirit to God at Tokat in Armenia, on October 16th, 1812,
at the age of thirty-two. Though his name does not actually
honour the C.M.S. roll of missionaries, it is a recollection to be
cherished that he was really the Society's first English candidate ;
and though his career was brief, and he was never technically
a missionary, yet his unreserved devotion to Christ's cause, and
the influence of his name and character upon succeeding genera-
tions, entitle him to be for ever regarded as in reality one of the
greatest of missionaries. " God measures life by love "; and by
that measure Henry Martyn's life was a long one indeed.
Before, however, Martyn approached the Society, an unlooked-
for opening had appeared for obtaining missionaries elsewhere.
Through two foreign Protestant ministers residing in London,
Mr. Latrobe, of the Moravian Church, w^ho was acting as agent
here of the Moravian Missions, and Dr. Steinkopfl', of the
Lutheran Savoy Chapel, the Committee heard of a Missionary
Seminary lately established at Berlin. This new institution in
Germany was really the outcome of the missionary awakening in
England. A certain Baron von Schirnding saw in a Hamburg
newspaper a notice of the formation of the London Missionary
Society, and wrote to the Directors about it. Their reply he
communicated to other godly men in Germany of the Pietist
school, and ultimately, with a vieW' to the promotion of a missionary
spirit, and to the supply of men to any societies that might be
formed, the Berlin Missionary Seminary was started, under the
auspices, and partly at the expense, of the good Baron, and under
the direction of a Lutheran pastor, the Rev. Jolm Ja^nicke. The
frugality expected from the students may be gathered from the
fact that they were to be allowed two rix-dollars (about 6i'. 8(/.)
per week for their entire maintenance. From this institution the
perplexed Conmiittee of the new Church Society, in what seemed
the hopeless backwardness of Englishmen, now hoped to obtain
missionai'ies. The second Annual Report, presented in June, 1802,
began with these words :— " It is with much regret that your
Committee meet the Society without having it in their power to
report that any missionaries are actually engaged in fulfilling the
The First Missiosarihk 8^
pious designs of the Society. They had indulged the hope that, Part IF.
ill consequence of their earnest apphcations to a very numerous I'W-l.sii.
hody of clerg)'iiien in ahiiost every part of the kingdom, several ^'''"P- **•
persons in whose piety, zeal, and prudence the Committee might
conlide woidd ere this have offered themselves to lahour among
tlie heathen. Their hope has however heen disappointed." After
lanieiiting " tiie evident want of that lioly zeal which animated the
ajjostles and primitive Christians," the Committee wont on to
announce that, " following the steps of the Society for Promoting
(!inistian Knowledge," they were now looking to the Continent
for men, and expressed a hope that the new Jierlin Seminary
would presently supply them.
Within a month of this Keport heing presented, two of the
Berlin students, IMelchior Kenner, of tlie Duchy of Wurtendjerg, The first
and Peter Ilartwig, a Prussian, liad heen accepted hv correspon- ^na"?ic8.
dence ; and in Novemher of that same year, lbO'2, they arrived in
England- at the very time when Henry Martyn was in connnuni-
cation with tlie Society. Germans and l-higlishmen did not study
each otliers' language then as they do now ; and when the two
men appeared hefore the Committee in the library of St. Anne's
Rectory there was no means of conversing with them. A few days
after, however, the Committee received tliem again along with
Dr. SteinkopfT, who acted as inteipreter ; and having accepted them
as " missionary catechists " for West Africa, sent them to lodge at
riai)liam, where they could learn a little English hefore going'^out.
When tliey were ready to sail. Dr. Steinkopt'i on'eied to arrange for
tht'ir i-eceiving Lutheran orders ; and the Committee, to avoid^what
they thought woidd he the ecclesiastical irregularity of this being
done for a Church society within an English diocese, gave them
leave to go hack to Germany and be ordained there. They went
accordingly, and came back Lutheran clergymen, and therefore on
a par ecclesiastically with the German and Danish missionaries of
the S.P.C.K. in South India. The Committee then accepted them
as full " missionaries "; and the " catecliist " difficulty was thus
ilisposed of, as the friends who objected to laymen being sent out
were cpiite willing to recogni/e Lutheran orders. A passage
havmg been engagi'd for them— concerning which more presently,
- and Ilartwig having married Sarah Windsor, late governess in
Mr.^ Venn's family, it now only remained to bid them God-speed.
This first Valedictory Dismissal is deeply interesting to us First Vaic
who now, year by year, witness the wonderful scenes on similar DjVm'iss
occasions. It was what was called " an Open Committee," held """"'" '
at the New London Tavern in Chcapside. Subsequently, these
Valedictory gatlierings, when held in pulilic halls, were called
Special Geiieial Meetings of the Society ; but in course of years
they came to be regarded as technically meetings of the General
Conmiittee, ami the proceedings were entered in a regular way in
the Minute Books. The altered procedure in I'ecent years "will
appear hereafter. At that first Dismissal, on Januarv 31st, 1804
Q 2
§4 The First Missionaries
Part II. there were present twenty clergjaiien and twenty-four laymen.
1786-1811. Ladies were not yet invited to the Society's pubhc meetings ; the
Chap. 8. fivst occasion of their being present was at tire fourth Valedictory
Dismissal, in 1811. At the fifth Dismissal, in 1812, there was
also a service at St. Lawrence Jewry, with a collection which
amounted to £72. Eeverting to this first one, the chair was taken
by the Eev. Henry Foster, one of the most regular members of
the Committee ; the Instructions were read by Pratt ; the two
missionaries, unable to speak English with sufficient fluency,
responded by presenting a written letter to the Committee ; and
that was all. The most interesting incident of the gathering, to us,
was the presence of Henry Marty n, who was then still expecting
to join the Society. In his journal we find the following entry : —
" At one o'clock we went to hear the cliarge delivered to the mis-
sionaries at the New London Tavern in Cheapside. There was nothing-
remarkable in it, but the conclusion was affecting. I shook hands with
tlie two missionaries, and ahnost wished to go with them, but certainly
to go to India."
" Nothing remarkable ": no, Henry Martyn could not foresee
Pratt's In- with what deep interest those first Instructions would be read
structions. xiinety years after. But even when set side by side with the
ablest of the long series of masterly state papers produced in later
years by Henry Venn the Younger in the form of Instructions to
departing missionaries, Josiah Pratt's " charge " will not suffer by
the comparison. It does not convey injunctions regarding personal
conduct ; it does not give spiritual counsel. For these it refers
the brethren to some more private Instructions separately given.
But it ably reviews the position of affairs in West Africa at the
time, and directs the missionaries as to the course they shall
pursue in various contingencies. It expresses thankfulness that
when the Society had " the means and the will " to send forth
messengers of the Gospel, but was " destitute of proper instru-
ments," these men, having no pecuniary means, had " depended on
tlie providence of God to furnish them," and had in faith gone to
tlie Berlin Seminary to be prepared for missionary service. It ex-
presses the opinion that the best plan of operations for a Mission
would be a " Settlement," " consisting of several Christians of
both sexes living as a small Christian community, and exhibiting
to the Natives the practical influence of Christianity in regulating
the tempers and the life, and in thus increasing the domestic
felicity"; but that until, if ever, it should be "in the power of
the Society to accomplish this plan upon any considerable scale,"
which "must be left to the gracious Providence of God," the
Committee would " imitate the example of our Lord, when He
sent His disciples two and two to declare the glad tidings of His
Kingdom." One passage, in whicli the missionaries are instructed
how to deal witli slave-traders, is especially worth quoting for its
wisdom : —
" You will take all prudent occasions of weaniug the Native cliiefs
The First Missionaries 85
from this traflSc, by depicting its criminality, the miseries wliicli it Part II.
ocrasinns to Africa, and tho obstacles which it opposes to a more 1786-1811.
lirolitablt^ and p;(^nerous intercourse with the European nations. liizt Chap. 8.
wliih^ you do this, you will cultivate kindness of spirit towards thoso
persons who are connected with tliis trade. You will make all due
allowances for tlmir habits, theii- pri'jndices, and their views of interest.
Let tlu'm never be mi;t by you with reproaches and invectives, however
di'based j'ou may find them in mind and manners. Let them never
have to char<i(! you with intriyuinu; aifainst them and thwartiiifj their
schemes; but let them feel that, tliou^di the silent influence of Chris-
tianity must, whenever truly felt, inidermine the soiuces of their piin,
yi't in you, and in all luider your influence, they meet with openness,
simplicity, kindness, and brotherly love."
At the second Valedictory Mectinfj, January 13th, 1806, which Second
may conveniently ho noticed at this point, there was given, in dfictory
addition to the formal written Instructions read hy the Secre- Meeting,
tary, a spiritual address liy a clergyman ; which custom has heen
adhered to ever since. On tliat occasion the speaker, with great
appropriateness, was Jolm Venn ; and liis address, printed witli J- Venn's
the Annual Report, is every way admirahle, and might be de- ^ ^^^^'
livcred now, almost word for word, to any departing missionary
hand. He dwells on the example of John the Baptist, of our
hlesscd Lord Himself, and of the Apostles ; and then also on that
of the modern missionaries whose names, even at so early a date,
were known and honoured, Eliot, Brainerd, and Schwartz, and
the ^loravians in Greenland. One lesson drawn from the example
of John the J^aptist is worth noting. Venn observes that " an
external appearance of sanctity" in him "seems to have had a
wonderful effect in impressing the minds of the Jews "; and
lu-ges that " the same impression, in some way, viust be made
upon the people, that we are above the zvorld. In vain," he adds,
" will those who are eager about the accommodations and enjoy-
ments of the world persuade mankind that they are truly in
earnest in their religion." And take this striking description of a
true missionary's cliaracter :
'■ He is one who, likc^ Enoch, walks with TJod, and derives from constant
I'niiimunion with Him a portion of the diviiui likeness. Dead to the
usual piusuits of the world, his afi'ectioiis arc^ fixed upon thinj^s above,
where Christ sitteth at the ri^jht hand of t!od. He is not inthu-nced,
therefore, by the love of fame and distinction, the desire of wealth, or
the love of ease and .self-indulgence. Deeply atlected by the sinful and
ruined state of mankind, especially of the Heathen, he devotes his life,
with all its faculties, to jiromote their salvation, liulaunted by dancers,
unmoved by sufrerinj,fs and ]iain, he considers not his life dear, .so that
he may ;j;lorify Cod. With the world under his feet, with Heaven in his
eye, with the (Jospel in his hand, and Chri.st in his heart, he })leads a.s an
anibassa<lor for (lod, knowing nothing but Jesus Christ. <;njovinc nothing
but the conversion of sinners, hoping for nothing but the promotion of
the Kingdom of Christ, and j^loryinc in notbiiiij but in the cross of
Christ .Jesus, by which he is crucified to the woild and the world to
him. Daily studying the word of life, and transformed him.self more
and more into the image which it sets before him, ho holds it forth to
voyages.
86 The First Missionaries
Part II. others as a light to illuminate the darkness of the Avorld around him,
1786-1811. as an exhibition of the light and glory of a purer and higher world
Chap. 8. above."
A valedictory address by Thomas Scott, in 1811, is also
singularly wise and comprehensive ; but, like his first Annual
Sermon, very long, occupying thirty-two octavo pages.
The first But to appoint men to West Africa, and to send them there,
were two very different things. The only conveyance that could
be heard of was a slave-ship, regularly fitted up for the trade ;
but though there would be plenty of room in her until she arrived
off the Coast, application for a passage was refused. Zachary
Macaulay, who was now a member of the Committee, was " re-
quested to seek for some other vessel "; and at length he " found "
the John, belonging to a firm of woollen drapers, proceeding to
Sierra Leone, and succeeded in engaging passages for the two
missionaries at thirty guineas each. The John sailed, with other
merchant-vessels bound elsewhere, under the protection of an
armed convoy; and this first voyage of C.M.S. missionaries proved
more prosperous than some later ones, as they reached Sierra
Leone safely after fifty-seven days' sailing, only four times longer
than the fortnight occupied by steamers to-day. But the voyage
of the second party^ — three men, Nylander, Biitscher, and Prasse —
illustrates vividly the delays and inconveniences, to say nothing
of dangers, to which the travellers in those days were exposed.
After five weeks of waiting at Liverpool, their ship sailed on Feb-
ruary 12th, 1806, ])ut was stranded on the Irish coast. After seven
more weeks' delay in Ireland, they sailed again on April 22nd
from Bristol ; but the ship had to put into Falmouth to join others
sailing under convoy. While the brethren were on shore, the
captain suddenly weighed anchor without giving them notice,
and resumed his voyage. They hastily engaged an open boat,
hoping to catch up the vessel, which, before steam made ships
independent of the wind, was generally possible ; but the attempt
failed, and after being long tossed about by a violent gale, and in
imminent peril, they had the mortification of being ol)ligcd to
return to Falmouth. Providentially the wind changed, and the
whole fleet had to put back. Thus they were enabled to em-
bark again, and after losing the convoy and narrowly escaping
a French privateer, they reached Madeira on June 2nd. There
the captain, who had been drinking, suddenly died, and the ship
was detained more than three months until fresh orders could
come from England. At last, on September 22nd they safely
reached Sierra Leone, more than seven months after their first
sailing.
The next party from Berlin came to England under difliculties
of another kind, which are thus referred to in the Report : —
" These brethren left Berlin on July 2nd, embracing the oppor-
tunity afforded between the time of signing the Armistice between
the Russians and the French, and the conclusion of the Peace of
The First Missionaries 87
Tilsit. Bxf avoiding the great roads, and travelling on foot, they Part ll.
arrived without interruption, through many difficulties, at Werni- ^JJ^^^^^^y-
gerode. From Wernigerode they went to Altona ; from that place ^P"
to Tonningen, and thence they emharked for this country."
At this point it may bo of interest to glance at the Society's ^^''j;';'^^"
published accounts, and see its expenditure upon these early mission-
missionaries. In the account for 1803-4, the following items *""•
occur : —
i: .-. ,1.
Hy till' Ivhicatioii of Four Studeiit.s at tliu Semi-
uiuy at Berlin. Six niontlis . . . . . . 7l' 3 0
By Exiieuee.s on Account of the Missionaries
Renner and Hartwig, during tlieir Stay in England,
for Hoard, Lodging, Washing, Apparel, Education,
and Incidents I'L'l •» 11
Hv their Passage to and from ftermany to obtain
Onlination, and necen.sary ExiKMices .... •"!'•• 1- /
By Conveyance of tlieni and Mrs. Hartwig to Porl.s-
niou'tli \vitli\lieir Baggage, »S.c., and Expences during
tlieir Stay tliere, previous to tlieir sailing . . . -1 13 0
By tlie'ir Passage for Sierra Leone, thirty giiineas
eacl'i. with sundry Articles of Clothing suitable for
that Climate, and other Necessaries .... I'l'i' 3 8
In the account for 1805-6, one of the items is as follows : —
Sundry.small Artii-les r)f Apparel and incidental Ex-
pences, with Board. Washini:, Lodging:, tS.c.. for the
live Missionaries, Woman and Child, diirinp their stay
in England, with Charges for their Instruction in the
Enjilish Language, Apothecary's Attendance, an«l
Medicine for two of them in a dangerous illness, itc. 3JI lU 11
And ill the accoiuit for 1806-7 are these items : —
For the Passa<ie of Three Missionaries to Africa,
with Apparel and other Necessaries . . . . 1'.'3 II 1
Expenc(>s of the said Missionaries in Ireland, in
conse(|uenco of the Vessel being stranded oil" Wex-
ford 73 1 1 0
Further Expences in Madeira, durinp a stay there
of several Months, in consequence of the Death of
their Captain -"" " •'
Very early in the history of their enterprise, the Committee of ^');"^'<^'^*''^»
the young Society had to learn by experience how the work of 'pieid.
God may l)o marred by the infirmities of men. First they were
perplexed by getting very little news of tlie missioiuiries. At
one time eight months elapsed without any tidings from Sierra
Leone at all. Then came criticism from onlookers, that the men
were slow at the language, and not getting at the people. Then
followed plain indicati.ms of friction among the brethren. At
first the Committee had appointed Renner " Senior." Then they
made all equal. Then they re-appointed Renner " Superior."
These are troubles whicli some of the younger Societies in our
88 The First Missionaries
Part II. own day have had to go through, though the pubhc hear nothing
"^ruf'^^s'^' °^ ^^' ^^^® °^^ Societies are not free from the difficulties ; but
^P" ■ they have learned by long experience the best ways of dealing
with such matters. The early Committee were often perplexed,
though never in despair ; often cast down, though never
" destroyed." Of the first five missionaries, already named,
three proved excellent and faithful workers, accomplished what
for West Africa may be called long service (Renner seventeen
years, Nylander nineteen, Biitscher eleven), and died at their
posts. One, Prasse, was also excellent, but died two years after
landing. This is a satisfactory record, notwithstanding that the
fifth, Hartwig, turned out badly, and caused grave mischief in
Hartwig's Africa and untold sorrow to the Committee. He engaged in
the slave-trade, and in many other ways proved himself quite
unworthy of the name of missionary. His poor wife, Venn's
former governess, had to leave him and come home. For several
years Hartwig wandered about in Africa, and at length, "coming
to himself " in the " far country " of sin, wrote home to Pratt in
penitence and remorse. The Society declined to reinstate him
as a missionary, but consented to engage him on trial as an
interpreter and translator ; and his brave wife went out again
and rejoined him. He died, however, almost immediately, and
Mrs. Hartwig a few months afterwards.
Pratt's letters to the brethren on these various difficulties are
full of both wisdom and tenderness. God had indeed manifested
His gracious favour to the Society in giving it such a Secretary.
It is also worth noting how entirely open tlie Committee were
regarding these trials. The fall, and the penitence, of Hartwig
were fully recorded for all men to read ; and so were the minor
infirmities of others from time to time. But it must be remem-
bered that the printed accounts rarely went into the hands of any
one who would not regard such troubles wath prayerful sympathy.
To publish a man's unsatisfactory conduct in these days would be
to ruin him for life.
At the very beginning of even the less serious of these painful
experiences, the Committee made up their minds to send out no
men who were not trained under their own eye ; and in 1806
much time and thought were given to the subject of a Seminary
in England. In consultation with Thomas Scott, who was now
Rector of Aston Sandford, Bucks, they ultimately arranged for
their candidates to reside at Bledlow, a village five miles off,
where Nathaniel Gilbert, formerly chaplain at Sierra Leone, was
rector. They were to reside with William Dawes, a gentleman
who had been twice governor of Sierra Leone, and who knew
something of the Susoo language, as well as of Hindustani,
Persian, and Arabic ; and they were to go over to Scott once a
week for further theological teaching. The third party of
Germans, Barneth, Klein, Wcnzel, and Wilhelm — the party
already mentioned as having to journey from Berlin by byways
The First Missionaries 89
and on foot,— were thus sent to Bledlow ; also two English candi- Part II.
dates, who, howevei-, proved unsatisfactory, and only stayed a 1786-1811.
few weeks. Nor did the four Germans stay long, though this was ^^^V- 8.
not their own fault, hut hecause Mr. Dawes moved from Bledlow.
Then Scott, with his indomitahle spirit, although much occupied
with liis hihlical work, consented to take the candidates himself ; t. Scott
and he continued this important service for some years, until in 1815 *^ ''■^'""•
failing health compelled him, after most courageous struggles, to
give up the work. Under him the men did well ; they were true
and humhle Christians, won the hearts of the Buckinghamshire
farmers and lahourers, and responded readily to Scott's teaching.
He shrank from no laliour. Shortly after he took them, the
Committee wrote and requested him to instruct the candidates in
Susoo and Arabic, he being totally ignorant of hoth languages !
It is amazing to find that he really set to work, though over sixty,
to learn both. lie and his pupils together, by means of those
linguistic works upon which the infant Society had incurred its
eailiest expenditure, did manage to get a fair knowledge of Susoo ;
and though Arabic was far more diilicult, his familiarity with
Hebrew helped him, and within a few months he set about
reading the Koran with the students.
Not long after Scott began his work, the fii'st two Englishmen F'^st
sent out by the Society came on to the roll, but without going misS-
under his instruction. They were in fact not " missionaries" in *''''=5-
the Society's sense of the word, but Christian artizans, engaged to
go to New Zealand as pioneers of industry and civilization, though
with the object, through these, of introducing the Gospel ; and
they were called in the Eeports "lay settlers." These were
William Hall, a joiner from Carlisle, and John King, a shoemaker
from an Oxfordshire village. They proved the first agents in one
of the Society's greatest and most fruitful enterprises, the initiation
of which will have to be reviewed in an earlv cliapter.
But in October, 1809, just two months 'after -Hall and King
sailed, the Committee accepted for training a married shoemaker
named Tliomas Norton, a man of real ability, who had already, like
Carey, studied Greek in the intervals of his trade, and^ who
ultimately received holy orders and was one of the first two
English clergymen sent out by the Society. At first it was con-
templated to send him to one of the Universities; but Scott
urged that the university life of the period was not favoural)le to
the cultivation of the missionary spirit or of missionarv habits of
life, and it was resolved to send" him and his wife to Aston Sand-
ford. They must come, wrote Scott, by the coach which ran
three times a week from the Bull, Holborn. Thov should be met
m the evening in a tilted cart, the best cojivevance for those
roads.
Till' next English candidate accepted was William Greenwood,
a blanket manufacturer from Dewsbury, in 1811; and in the
following year came Benjamin Bailey and Thomas Dawson, from
90 The First Missionaries
Part II. the same towTi. Nine other Germans were also received, one of
^Cb^^^R^ whom was afterwards the famous South Indian missionary
ap^ • Ehenius. A httle later, the Committee declined the offer of a
Shropshire curate who required at least £700 a year in order to do
missionary work effectively. Meanwhile Scott's bodily infirmities
were increasing ; and offers from the Rev. John Buckworth, of
Dewsbury, and the Rev. T. Rogers, of Wakefield, in 1814, to
train some of the candidates were accepted. The first candidate
sent to the latter clergyman, an Essex farmer's son, bore a
name that was to be highly honoured in after years — Henry
Baker.
And now the very difiiculty presented itself that had led, at the
beginning, to the adoption of the abortive catechist scheme before
referred to. Norton and Greenwood were ready for ordination ;
How but how were they to obtain it ? The bishops had not yet smiled
dination .? upou the uew Society at all, and when two or three were cautiously
approached through personal friends, they entirely declined to
ordain men for work outside their own dioceses, or even for
curacies within their dioceses if understood to be merely stepping-
stones to foreign work. Those who were thus applied to were not
the Archbishop of Canterbury or the Bishop of London, to whom
in the present day we go ; for Archbishop Moore, who had
promised to " regard the Society's proceedings with candour," and
Bishop Porteus, who had supported the Evangelicals in philan-
thropic movements, were dead, and Dr. Manners-Sutton and Dr.
Randolph, who now filled the two posts respectively, were quite
beyond the reach of the " serious clergy." Scott would have taken
Norton for his own curacy, but Buckinghamshire was then in the
diocese of Lincoln, and Bishop Tomline was at that very time
fulminating against the Evangelicals (who were very mild Cal-
vinists) in his Refutation of Calvinism. At last, a Cheshire
clergyman who wanted a curate succeeded in obtaining ordination
in Chester diocese for Greenwood, on Trinity Sunday, 1813 ; and
the incumbent of St. Saviour's, York, persuaded the northern
Archbishop (Harcourt) to ordain Norton for him at the following
Christmas. Norton was rather closely examined on certain points
of Calvinistic doctrine, because he had been trained by Scott; but
he wrote, " Through mercy I was enabled to answer the Arch-
bishop either in Scripture language or that of our i\rticles."
Thus, fourteen years after the foundation of the Society, two
bishops were induced to perform acts that assisted its plans ;
though, be it observed, they did not perform these acts for the
Society's interests, nor at its request, but only for work (albeit
temporary) under the clergy in their own dioceses. The circum-
stance throws light on the patient faith of the Committee, in
going on with an enterprise which by this time, as we shall see
hereafter, was growing rapidly iinder their hands, but for which
they could as yet perceive no certain way of obtaining fit instru-
ments duly commissioned by their own Church. They could not
The First Missionaries 91
foresee that their missionary candidates would in after years form Part II.
a distinct element in the London ordinations, and that again and ^p^^'^^^y'
again men trained by them, and without the advantage of Uni- ^^'
versity education, would take the first place in the strictest exami-
nation any Church of England diocese lias, and read the Gospel
accordingly in St. Paul's Cathedral.
The obstacles in the path of the Connnittcc emphasize also tlio
del)t that English Church Missions owe to Lutheran Germany. Our
As we have already seen, all the S.P.C.K. men in India were Qe'Jmany.
Ijutherans. In the Church Missionary Society's first fifteen years,
it sent out twenty-four missionaries. Of these, seventeen were
Gei'mans ; and of the seven Englishmen, only three were ordained,
viz., the two above-mentioned, and William Jowett, the first
University graduate on the Society's roll, having been 12th
Wrangler in 1810. Of him we shall have more to say in a future
chapter. Meanwhile, we can understand the feelings of Melville
Home, one of the leading Evangelicals of that day, when in eloquent
language, in a speech at Leicester, he compared England and
Germany. On the one hand, England had stood alone " as the
forlorn hope and supporting pillar of the laws, libei'ties, and
religion of the vanquished Continent," when all Europe was
under the iron heel of Buonaparte. On the other hand, Germany,
amid all her sufferings from the horrors of war, was " advancing
with the sacred standard of the cross of Christ and reviving the
drooping zeal of the Church of England." But he was not happy
in the prospect. " Highly," he said, " as I honour the pious
Lutheran ministers, who are bold to suffer and die in our cause,
I cannot brook the idea of their advancing alone into the field with
the standard of our Church in their hands. Where arc our own
ministers'? What happy peculiai'ity is there in the air of Ger-
many ? What food is it which nourishes these pious Lutherans ?
I cannot allow these good men to stand in our place. Let us
assert om* own dignity and that of the Chiu-ch to which we
belong ! " In after years, some of the noblest of the Society's
missionaries were Germans ; but they were not Lutherans. They
were for the most part trained at Islington, and received English
orders from the Bishop of London. Though England cannot
claim them, the English Church can. And now we have lived to
see the day when in England itself the missionary vocation is at
last widely recognized as worthy of the very best of our young
men, and to send forth year by year inci'easing numbers of those
who are manifestly the Lord's chosen vessels to bear His name
before the Heathen.
CHAPTEK IX.
Africa and India : Struggle and Victory.
Renewed Anti-Slave Trade Campaign — Wilberforce's Triumph — Sierra
Leone — India in the Dark Period — Carey and Serampore — Claudius
Buchanan — The Vellore Mutiny — Controversy at Home — The
Charter Debates — Another Victory — India Open.
" Let no man's heart fail because of him; thy servant will go andfght tvith
this PhilisHne . . . So David prevailed." — 1 Sam. xvii. 32, 50.
Part II.
1786-1811.
Chap. 9.
First
Missions
in Africa.
Resumed
attack on
the Slave
Trade.
WING started the new Society, let us now resume
the story of the two great mission-fields that were
"waiting," Africa and India. In our Fifth Chapter,
we left the British Slave Trade still rampant in West
Africa at the close of the eighteenth century, and the
Dark Period of twenty years just beginning in India in 1793.
Meanwhile, missionary work had been commenced in South
Africa. The Moravians were first, as they have been in other
fields. George Schmidt went out as early as 1737, and laboiu^ed
six years among the Hottentots ; but it was not until the last
decade of the century that the Dutch, who then reigned at the
Cape, allowed others to go. The British, however, conquered the
colony, and in 1798 the new London Missionary Society sent that
remarkable Hollander, Dr. John Vanderkemp, to work among
both Hottentots and Kaffirs. How the Gospel was sent to West
Africa will appear in a future chapter. We now turn again to the
Imttle of the Slave Trade.
Year after year, as we have seen, Wilberforce's efforts had been
ballled ; and when the eighteenth century closed, the question
seemed no nearer solution. Yet, notwithstanding the opposition
of the slave-traders, of the royal dukes, and of King George
himself, conviction gradually forced itself upon the minds of
most honest men. The Evangelical Churchmen, the Methodists,
the regular Dissenters, and the Quakers, combined to use all
their influence in getting petitions sent
some of the bishops did good service in
Political events, and the overwhelming
to Parliament; and
the House of Lords,
anxieties about the
Wa)-, prevented any definite steps being taken in the first three
years of the new century ; l)ut in 1804 Wilberforce again
advanced to the attack. The change in the minds of men was at
once apparent. The bill passed all stages in the Commons by
CHARLES GRANT.
REV. HENRY MARTYN.
REV. ABDUL MASIH.
REV. CLAUDIUS BUCHANAN.
REV. DANIEL CORRIE.
Chnrlos Gi-aiit, ?;ast India Director.
irciiiy Miutyn. Senior \Vniii>rler, Kiist India Chaplain ; Pir.-t Enirlisliman offering to C.M.S.
-MnIuI Mnsili. Henry Martyn'.s Ci.nvcrt from Islam ; First Iniliaii Clerirvman.
C'laudiu.-i Hiu-lmnan, V.nsi India ('liaii)iiin.
Diuiiel forrie, Kast India Chaplain; First Bishop of Madras.
Aj-rica and Ixdia : Struca.le axd Victory 93
large majorities. But the House of Lords deferred it for a year ; Part II.
and in 1805, owing to the absence of many friends " through 1786-1811.
forgetfulness, or accident, or engagements preferred f)om hike- 'f'" ^'
wannness," it was thrown out in the Commons. Wilherforce
was deeply pained. " I could not sleep," he wrote ; " the poor
blacks ruslied into my mind, and the guilt of our wicked land."
Tiien can)e the death of I'ilt, licart-hroken at Napoleon's crushing
victory at 'Austerlitz ; and then the death of his old rival, but
comrade-in-arms against the slave-trade, Fox. Wilberforce had
now to contend, not only with the last desperate energies of " the
trade," and the active hostility of the royal dukes, but with the
lukewarmness of leading statesmen who professed to be allies.
But he was the central figure of an increasing body of resolute
men, bent not only upon the abolition of the slave-tratle, but upon
many other ])hihiiitlnopic objects. Mr. Colquhoun draws several
pictures of Wil her force's daily life, first in Palace Yard, and Scene in
afterwards at Kensington. Here is a fragment describing the Yard"
scene in Palace Yard, while Pitt was yet alive : —
" Its boll is always tinkling, iuid the kn( >ckt;r never still ; up tlie c'r« )\vde(l
door-step and douu again there flows a stream of men, which runs on
without stofjping from morning to niglit; and sncli (jueer visitors, black
and white, rosy-faced Saxons, and woolly-liairod Africans; bnstling,
warm men from tlie city, spruce peers and baronets from the AVest End,
stout scpiires from Yorksliire. broad-cloth manufacturers from l^radford
and Ficeds, broad-brimmed (juakers from London, York, and Norwich,
yellow-faced nabobs who have been burnt under the tropics; and mixed
with these, black-coated clergymen, and grave dignitaries, and smooth-
shaven preachers of many sects. Here you meet that stout Scotchman,
East India Director. Mr. Grant, whose sons are just beginning to be
noticed, and that stern, silent tnan, with (juick step and keen grey eyes,
the father of a son more famous, Zathary Macaulay ; and that i,navo,
austere banker, whose word the ("ity of Loiitlon takes as a bond, who
has a name and nott; in the House of Conunons Henry Thornton ; and
that long, .shy, bashful cleri,fyman, Mr. (iisborne, who comes up un-
willingly from his Staffordshire woods; and that stout, portly dean, Mr,
Milner, who walks and talks as if he had borrowed the voice of Dr.
Jolui.son ; and that gentle layman. Mr. liabinjj;ton, from Leicesti'rshire ;
and the acute and energetic William Smith, member for Norwich; and
the courteous peer from the hills of Cumberland, Lord Muncaster. That
(piick step and keen legal eye belong to Mr. Stephen. Mixed with these,
you have the bustling Secretary of the Treasury, and the eaj;le-eyed
Sct)tchman with his broad accent, onuiipotent to the north of the Tweed;
and then (for the House is up) a notable pair, the tall figure of the
Premier [l'itt\ with the ruddy features, cheerful voice, and pleasant joke
of Addington."
Not till the winter of lHOG-7 did \Vilberforce at last witness the
triunipli of his cause. Then, in division after division, he proved
victorious ; obstacle after obstacle was overcome ; the Lords passed
the bill ; then it came to the Connnons. On February 23rd the
second reading was pioposed. The o})position now nuide little
show. Sir Samuel Romilly touched the House to its heart's core
94 Africa and India : Strucgle and Victory
Part II. when he " entreated the young members of parhament to let that
1786-1811. day's event be a lesson to them, how much the rewards of virtue
^^' ' exceeded those of ambition ; and then contrasted the feelings of
Napoleon Buonaparte in all his greatness with those of the
honoured man who would that night lay his head upon his pillow
British y^Y\di remember that the Slave Trade was no more "; and shouts of
Trade acclamation burst forth such as had rarely been heard in the
abolished. House. The second reading was carried by 283 to 16 ; the bill
went safely through committee, and back to the Lords for final
acceptance ; and on March 25th, 1807, it received the royal assent.
" God will now bless the country," wrote the victorious champion:
" the first authentic account of the defeat of the French has come
to-day." It was true. From that time the tide in the great
European struggle turned. In the very year which abolished the
hateful traffic, began the series of events in Spain which cul-
minated in the victories of Wellington and the fall of Napoleon.
" Oh, what thanks," continues Wilberforce's journal, "do I owe
the Giver of all good, for bringing me in His gracious providence
to this great cause, which at length, after almost nineteen years'
labour, is successful! "
In the same year, 1807, other events occurred of great impor-
tance to the Colony of Sierra Leone. First, the misfortunes of
the Sierra Leone Company, which had often given great anxiety
to Wilberforce and the Thorntons, led to a parliamentary inquir}'.
Transfer of and this to the transfer of the settlement to the direct administra-
Le^o^neto ^^^^^ ^^ ^^® Crowu, which was effected on January 1st, 1808.
the Crown. The directors of the Company, in a final report, justly pleaded
that, notwithstanding the tremendous obstacles they had had to
encounter, and the heavy financial losses incurred in the enter-
prise, much good work had been done. They had " established a
colony which, by the blessing of Providence, might become an
emporium of commerce, a school of industry', and a source of
knowledge, civilization, and religious improvement, to the in-
habitants of the African Continent "; and they declined to regard
this as an unworthy return for the pecuniary sacrifices of the
shareholders. Like another African Company long afterwards,
they were " content to take out their dividends in philanthropy."
New plans Then sccondly. Government arranged for the reception at
s°ave" Sierra Leone of slaves who might be rescued from slave-ships still
plying in defiance of the law and captured by the British cruisers
sent to enforce the law. The population thereu]ion began to
increase rapidly, some two thousand " liberated Africans," as they
were called, being added to it annually for several years. These
having been kidnapped from all parts of West Africa, tliere were
gathered at Sierra Leone repi'esentatives of more than a hundred
tribes, almost all speaking different languages or dialects. Their
moral condition was deplorable, and for some years the settlement
presented sad scenes of barbarism, immorality, and superstition.
But, thirdly, for the improvement and civilization of the people, a
Africa axp Ixdia : SrRUcnr.F. and Victory q;
new ComiJany was formed called the Afiicaii Institution. The Paht II.
Duke of Gloucester, one of the royal princes, was president ; and ^[f?*''''^|^'-
several bishops, statesmen, and philantluopists formed the {govern- '"^
inf^ body, including? Wilberforce, Clarkson, Granville Sharp, four
Thorntons, Zachary Macaulay, Charles Grant, James Stephen,
and others whose names will become familiar in this History.
I'jiier^etic steps were taken for the iM-nclit of the Colony. Schools
were opened ; the j^rowth of ])rofilal)le products was encoura^i'd ;
and the people were incited to en^'a^'e in both agriculture and
trade. But it must be acknowledj^ed that the success of these
measures was very partial ; and it was not until the direct teachini^ Yet one
of the Gospel was undertaken — from which the African .Xssociation {^^5!mg""
was precluded by its constitution - that any real and marked
improvement began to i)e seen in Sierra Leone.
How this teaching came to be given will appear hereafter.
But we can now see how natural it was for a new missionaiy
society founded by men of the " Clapham Sect " to i)ear the name
of .\frica upon the forefront of its title. In tlie Instructions
delivered to the first two missionaries sent out, in 1S04, the facts
that had direct^i'd the minds of the ('onimittee to \Vest Africa are
clearly stated : —
" The teiiipural uiisoiy <if tlie whole Ib-atlit'ii WCiM has l)eiii drt'a<l-
fiilly a>i;^ravatu(l liy its iiitfrcoursp witli men \vln> hear tin* nuiiie of
Christians; hut tlu- Wisteni coast of Afrita hetwcen the Tropics, and
iiiort' csiK'ciiilly tliat jtart of ithetwcen the Line and the Tropic ofCancer,
has not only, in (■oimiion witli otlier huatlion (oiintrifs. iiM-civcd from us
our disi-ascs and our vit-es. hut it lias e\t'r hcen tlic chief theatre of the
ii))iiimaii Slave Tiade ; and tens of tliou.saiids of its cliiidnn have Iteen
animally torn from tlieir ile:iri-st connexions to minister to the hixuries
of men liearini; the Christian name, and who had no mon; ri^ht to exeicise
tliis violenci! than the .Vfricans had to depopulate our coa.sts with a
similar view. 'I'lie wiekedness and w retclutjness eonsecpient upon thi.s
trade of hiood have deeply and extensively infected tlie.se siiores ; and
tliou^li \Vest«'rn .Africa may justly chaifre liei- suft'erin^'s from this trade
ujion all Kuropi", direetly or n-motely. yi-t the British Nation is now, and
has lon<; heen, most tleeply criminal. We desire, therefore, while wo
jiray and lahour for tlie removal i>f this evil, to make We.stern Africa tlie
l>est remnmratioii in our power for its manifold wrongs.''
Nobly indeed was this ntible purpose fulfdled. There are few
episodes in all missionary history more moving than the story of
the early i-lVoits of the Church ^lissionary Society in West .\frica.
It is a story of faith tested and tested again and again, of patience
having her perfect work, of disappointment and disaster, and of
the mighty power of l)iviiie grace in the luaits of the most
degiaded of mankintl.
Let us now turn to India. One result of Wilberforce's unsuc- ^"st India
r \ 1 • Ti- f 1 T-i T !• /-I • v-ompany
cessf ul attempt to ol)tam a modincation of the Last 1 nclia Company s exclude
charter in 1793 was that the Company stitTened its regulations ^1^*'°""
touching the admission into its territories of persons — merchants
96 Africa and India : Stkuggle and Victory
Part II. or others — not sent by itself. " A man without a ' covenant ' was
1786-1811. a dangerous person ; doubly dangerous the man without a ' cove-
Chap^9. ^^^-^^' ^^^^ jf^jif]^ ^^ Bible." '■'■'- Carey was the first to suffer. He
embarked in a Company's ship, but it being discovered, just before
she sailed, that he had no licence, he and his baggage were sent
ashore again. Then he obtained a passage in a Danish ship ; but
on his arrival at Calcutta, having no licence from the Company to
reside in Bengal, which at that time was necessary, Mr. Udny
entered his name as an indigo-planter, stood surety for his good
conduct in a large sum of money, and sent him to manage one of
his own indigo factories a hundred and fifty miles from Calcutta.
There, and in that capacity, lived for six years the one representa-
tive in India of the missionary zeal of Christian England ; and in
that obscure — one may say ignominious — way began English
Missions in her great dependency.
In 1796 came another Baptist missionary, Mr. Fountain, who
succeeded in entering the country in the character of a servant
on Mr. Udny's estate ; but his outspoken sympathy with French
republican notions caused alarm, and brought upon him the
censure of his Society. It was the avowal of similar views that
prevented that noble Scotchman, Mr. Haldane, who had sold his
large estate to go out and found a Mission in Bengal, from
obtaining leave from the Company to go ; and when, in 1799,
four more Baptist missionaries arrived in an American ship, great
alarm prevailed in Calcutta, more especially as a Calcutta paper,
mistaking the word " Baptist," stated that four Papists had
come, who were at once assumed to be French spies. In our
Fourth Chapter we saw something of the reasons for the horror
and detestation with which any democratic opinions were then
regarded ; and as Buonaparte was at that very time in Egypt,
and was known to have designs on India, we are not surprised
to find that the Governor-General was taking steps to expel
" all Frenchmen and republicans." Thirteen years after, when
Napoleon's Grand Army had been destroyed in Eussia, the Mis-
sionary Register opened its number for April, 1813, with an article
headed " India secured to Britain by Eussian Victories " — which
has in our day a curious sound.
Tlie four missionaries were instantly ordered to leave the
country ; but they contrived to get up the Hooghly in a boat by
night to Serampore, a small Danish settlement fifteen miles north
Danish of Calcutta. " It was a sort of Alsatian receptacle," says Sir John
?e^c"i5eT"* Kaye,t " for outcasts of all kinds. Fugitive debtors from Calcutta
them. found there an asylum where English law could not reach them ;
and even that most perilous and pestilential of all suspected
persons, the missionary of the Gospel, might lie there without
molestation." For the Danish governor, on being challenged by
the Calcutta authorities to give them up, refused to do so. The
* Kave's ChrL^tianihi in Tndla, ji. 223. t f^''^'-> P- 228.
Africa and India : Struggle and Viciorv 97
result was that Carey left his indigo factory and came and joined Part II.
them; and so, in January, 1800, began the great Serampore ^J,^^"^^^!-
Mission, which was to be a power in India for many a long year. ^^'
. A remarkable man must now be introduced, to whom, perhaps
more than to any one else, the coming opening of India to the
Gospel was due. Claudius Buchanan was a young Scotchman ciaudius
who had left his studies at Glasgow University to wander over Buchanan.
Europe with his violin, but, finding liimself destitute in England,
had " come to himself in the far country," had been led to Christ
by old John Newton, and sent to Cambridge at the expense of
Henry Thornton. Subsequently Simeon obtained for him an
East Indian chaplaincy, and he arrived in Calcutta in 1797. He
quickly became a power in Bengal, and in 1800 was appointed to
preach before the Governor-General, the Ma)(juis Wellesley, on a
nicnioraljle occasion. Nelson had destroyed the Fi-encli fleet at
the Battle of the Nile, and their Syrian campaign had failed ; and
a Thanksgiving Day was proclaimed at Calcutta " for the ultimate
and happy establishment of the tranquillity and security of the
British possessions in India." Lord Wellesley was so stirred by
Buchanan's sermon, that he ordered copies to be circulated all
over India and sent home to the East India Directors ; and
almost immediately afterwards he put David Brown and Buchanan
at the head of a great College he was founding for the education
of young Englishmen in the Indian languages, and generally for
the promotion of Western literature and science. As the only
man in India competent to teach Bengali was Carey, Brown per-
suaded the Governor-General to appoint him, assuring him that
he was " well affected to the Government." The large salaries
attached to the offices held by these three good men were
imreservedly devoted to preparing the way for further Missions
by printing translations of the Scriptures.
Buchanan spent some of his money in another way. He sent
home no less than £1650 to the universities and pui)lic schools of
England, Scotland, and Ireland, to be offered in prizes for the Buchanan
best essays and poems, English, Latin, and Greek, on subjects ''"^^*'
that would set the competing students thinking of the spread of
the Gospel in India. The subject of the Greek Ode, VivlaOtM <f>C)<;,
is worth noting in view of what will be related piesently. The
successful English poem was sent in by young Charles Grant, son
of the great Anglo-Indian above-mentioned, and fourth W^ rangier
in Henry Martyn's year. Buchanan followed this up by giving
Oxford and Cambridge £500 each for the best English prose work
on certain missionarj' topics, one of them being the History of
Missions in all ages. At Oxford, the prize was won by Hugh
Pearson, afterwards Dean of Salisbury, and biographer of
Schwartz, and of Buchanan himself. His Essay has been already
referred to, and quoted from, in this History.* At Cambridge the
• See p. 8.
VOL. I. H
q8 Afiuca and India : S-jkuggle and VjcroRi'
Part II. best Essay (though a technicahty deprived it of the prize) was by
1786-1811. John W. Cunningham, Fellow of St. John's, fifth Wrangler in
Chap. 9. 1802, and afterwards Vicar of Harrow. All these three successful
' competitors became active C. M.S. men.
Meanwhile Buchanan was vigorously using his own vigorous
pen, sending home his works for publication in England. One of
these, the Memoir of the Expediency of an Ecclesiastical Estahlish-
ment in British India, had great influence afterwards. Another,
entitled Christian Besearchcs in Die East, describing a visit he
paid to Travancore, in order to inquire into the condition of the
ancient Syrian Church there, led, ten years later, to the establish-
ment of the C.M.S. Travancore Mission.
Successor All this time the Serampore Mission had been growing in
NHssTon. strength and influence. Not only w^as its literary and translational
work most extensive and valuable, but it w^as gaining converts.
In six years ninety-six adults had been baptized, including six
Brahmans and nine Mohammedans. Sir William Jones, the great
Orientalist, had declared that no Brahman could be converted ; and
again and again, even to our own day, has it been asserted that no
Moslem ever is converted. Sir William knew the power of caste,
and the critics know the power of Islam. But he forgot, and they
forget, the power of the Cross ; and the Serampore converts w^ere but
the first of a long series of proud Brahmans and fanatical Moslems
who have come to the feet of the Son of God. There were some, in-
deed, as there have been some in all ages from Ananias and Sapphira
downwards, who proved unworthy members ; but others became
conspicuous examples of the transforming power of the Gospel.
Encouraged by these successes, and by the high character and
tolerant policy of Lord Wellesley, the Baptist missionaries began
to distribute tracts, and even to preach and teach, in Calcutta, and
in the surrounding rural districts ; but these proceedings were
quickly checked, and an unfortunate tract attacking the character
of Mohammed led to greater vigilance on the part of the
authorities. It was at this time, too, but after Lord Wellesley had
left India, that the Government passed a special Act taking the
Temple of Juggernaut, with all its horrors and immoralities, under
State protection and patronage.
Then, in 1806, occurred an event which threw back the progress
Veiiore of liberty for seven years. Some of the Sepoy troops at Vellore,
Mutiny. yiQ.^y Madras, mutinied. A mighty panic was engendered ; and it
suited the purpose of the Anglo-Indians w^ho were opposed to
Missions to attribute the outbreak to alarm caused by the presence
of missionaries.''' From that time the Company and its officers
became more and more hostile. Two Baptist missionaries who
More mis- arrived in 1807 were ordered off at once, and one of them pro-
sionaries ceeded to Burmah instead, and started a Mission there. In 1811,
excluded.
* AiJiopos of ibis panic Sir John Kaye observes, " It is always religion that
is to blame. If a man catches cold, be caught it at church ; such accidents
never happen at the theatre." Christiauity in India, p. 252.
Africa and India : Struggle and Victory 99
one of the Serampore men, Mr. Chamberlain, went up to Agra, Part II.
but was instantly sent back under a guard of Heathen Sepoys ; 1786-1811.
and on being invited again to the North-West to be tutor to an P"
officer's children, he was a second time ordered back by Lord
Hastings, then Governor-General, who said that "one might fire
a pistol into a magazine and it might not explode, but no wise
man would hazard the experiment." In 1812, three English and
five American missionaries arrived at Calcutta. The latter w'ere
the very first sent forth by the newly-formed American Board of
Commissioners of Foreign Missions, a body similar in constitution
to the London Missionary Society, liut, like it, virtually the society
of the Congregationalists. All the eight were peremptorily refused
permission to land. Two of the Americans, one of them being the
heroic Judson, became Baptists, and got leave to go to Burmah.
After a series of difficulties enough to try the faith and patience of
the boldest, but which cannot be detailed here, the other three,
who had escaped in a coasting vessel to Bombay, were allowed to
remain there ; and they ultimately laid the foundation of the
prosperous American Mission in that Presidency. Of the English-
men one was deported, one escaped to Serampore, and one to a
Dutch settlement ; but this one was eventually expelled, and the
Mission was ordered to pay £500 to cover the expense of sending
him home. Even at Madras, the Government of which was
usually more tolerant, and had just put up a monument to
Schwartz at the Company's expense, a missionary of the London
Missionary Society w^as expelled in the same year, 1812.
The Vellore Mutiny caiised greater alarm in England even than Contro-
in India. A war of pamphlets ensued, opened by a member of the Efnlund
East India Company named Twining, who quoted from Buchanan's
Memoir before mentioned, and moved the Court of Proprietors to
expel all missionaries from India and stop all printing of the
Scriptures in Indian languages ; and this motipn was only defeated
by the strenuous efforts of Charles Grant, who was now an
influential Director of the Company. A Bengal officer. Major
Scott-Waring, published a Vindication of the Hindoos from the
Aspersions of the Bev. C. Buchanan. Well might Wilberforce
write of the Anglo-Indians who, " having lived among Pagans
for many years," had now " come home with large fortunes, and
manifested their heathenish principles by openly espousing the
cause of the Vedas against the Scriptures and the Hindoo against
the Christian faith." Among the replies was one by Lord Teign-
mouth himself. Sydney Smith published his famous and furious
attack on Indian Missions in the Edinburgh Bevieiv (April, 1807),
aiming his bitterest shafts at the " consecrated cobblers " who
were engaged in such a work. Southey rejoined in the very first
number of the Quarterly Bevieiv (April, 1808).
Buchanan now came home, and threw himself into the conflict Bucha-
with characteristic impetuosity. But instead of flinging pamphlets campaign,
at his opponents, he preached sermons to his friends. If only the
H 2
100 Africa and India : Struggle and Victor v
Part II. Christian public could be stirred up to care for the evangelization
1786-1811. of India, he cared little for what the critics might say. His great
Chap. 9. ggi^n^oi-i c^t Bristol on February 26th, 1809, which (said a paper of
the day) " kept the minds of a large auditory in a state of most Hvely
sensation for an hour and twenty-five minutes," and which was
;'The Star published with the title " The Star in the East," may be truly said
Ealt.^' to have first awakened the interest in India which was presently
to win so remarkal)le a victory in Parliament. He described the
labours of both the little band of S.P.C.K. Lutheran missionaries
in the South and the Baptist brethren in the North. He told the
story of two converts from Mohammedanism, one of whom had
died a martyr for Christ. He appealed powerfully for the people
he loved so well, and closed with these striking words : ''■'■ —
" While Ave are disputing here whether the faith (jf Clirist can save the
Heathen, the Gospel hatli gone foi'th for tlie healing of the nations. A
cont'i-egatiou of Hindus will assemble on the morning of the Sabbath,
under the shade of a banyan-tree, not one of whom, perhaps, ever
heard of Great Britain by name. There the Holy Bible is opened ; the
Word of Christ is preached with eloquence and zeal; tlie atlections are
excited; the voice of prayer and praise is lifted up; and He who
hath promised His presence when two or three are gathered together
in His name, is there in the nudst of them to bless them, according to
His word. These scenes I myself liave witnessed; and it is in this
sense in particular I can say, We /tare .seen His tSfar in. the Ea^iT
Then, in 1810, he preached the C.M.S. Annual Sermon, on
the words, " Ye are the light of the world." This text, and the
" star in the east," are both of them interesting as embodying the
same thought as the subject he had chosen five years before for the
(ireek Ode ; and on the very words of that subject, " Let there be
light," he preached in the University Church at Cambridge in this
same year. Light for India's darkness was thus repeatedly his
theme ; and, in the C.M.S. Sermon, very impressively does he
dwell on both the darkness and the light.
In these ways the public mind was becoming familiarized with
the great questions about to be raised when the Company's
Charter should have to be renewed in 1813. A year before that,
Christian men began to form plans for hifluencing Parhament.
wiiber- Wilberforce, mindful of his defeat on the same question nineteen
force to the yg^rs before, would remember that it took exactly nineteen years
to get the Slave Trade abolished, and would be encouraged by the
victorious issue which God had graciously granted to his African
campaign to hope for a similar interposition of the same Lord of
Hosts in the Indian campaign he was about to undertake. " It is
a shocking idea," he wrote to a friend, " that we should leave sixty
milhons of our fellow-subjects, nay of our tenants (for we collect
about seventeen millions sterling from the rent of their lands), to
remain in a state of barbarism and ignorance, the slaves of the most
cruel and degrading superstition." To Hannah More he wrote,
* QMM. Report, 1809, Appendis, p. 515.
Africa and India : Struggle and Victory loi
" Now that the Slave Trade is abolished, this is by far the greatest Part II.
of our national sins." In his diary we see him using dinner- ""^p^^'-^^q"^'
parties and all sorts of other opportunities to influence leading men ^P"
to help him — to use his owai words — in "getting leave for Gospel
light to pass into India." "This," he wrote, "is indeed a cause
for which it is worth while being a public man."
The battle now began. Wilborforco marshalled his forces ;
Buchanan wielded his vigorous pen ; Grant and Parry used every
effort to influence their fellow-Directors ; Pratt threw his energies
into the work of rousing the country. On the other side pamphlet
after pamphlet, article after article in newspaper and review, held
up to the contempt of the world the miserable and hopeless
attempts of "consecrated cobblers" to convert the mild Hindu,
and at the same time, with glorious inconsistency, tried to frighten
the English people into the belief that unless they put a stop to
the said " consecrated cobblers " they would infallibly lose India.
The campaign \vas opened on April 24th, 1812, by an important ^^^^^^"^^
Public Meeting on the India question, arranged by the Church
Missionary Society, at which four hundred gentlemen assembled,
including many M.P.'s and other influential persons. Wilberforce
in his diary calls it " a grand assemblage," and adds, "I spoke
wdth acceptance." A few days later he attended a meeting of
the S.P.C.K. for the same object at the office of that Society,
which also had been stirred up by Buchanan's works, and which
was employing its more recognized influence in the same cause.'''
Besides the pressure brought to bear on the Government in
this way, and by personal influence, two measures of importance
were taken, chiefly at the instance and at the cost of the Church
Missionary Society. One was the rousing of the Christian public
to send petitions to Parliament from all parts of the country.
Pratt worked at this with untiring energy ; and the number sent
in (about 850) was the largest ever known up to that time upon
any subject. The other was the commissioning Buchanan to
take up his pen once more ; and two powerful pamphlets were
the result, one on the general subject of religion in India and the
other on the importance of an "ecclesiastical establishment"
there. These were printed at the Society's expense, sent to all
M.P.'s, and circulated by thousands in the country. In the midst
of the agitation arrived the news of Henry Martyn's death, at
Tokat in Armenia, on his way home from India and Persia. Such
an event, at such a moment, stirred the hearts of the workers in
the cause, and spurred them on to more strenuous efforts for the
opening of India to the Gospel.
"The harvest," writes Sir John Kaye, "now appeared ready
for the sickle. The labours of those busy workmen, Grant,
Teignmouth, Thornton, Wilberforce, Buchanan, and their com-
* In the recently-published History of the S.P.C.K. the entire credit is given
to that Society, and the C.M.S. is not mentioned. But this is not "history."
I02
Africa and India : Struggle and Victory
Part II.
1786-1811.
Chap. 9.
House of
Commons
examines
Lord
Teign-
mouth.
panions, were at length about to be rewarded. They had toiled
and striven manfully for years ; they had encountered public
opposition and private ridicule ; they had been shouted at by the
timid and sneered at by the profane ; they had l)een described as
dangerous intermeddlers, and as imbecile fanatics. They had
contended only against the open official suppression of Christianity
in India ; they had asked only for toleration ; they had demanded
that, in the midst of opposing creeds, the faith of the Christian
might be suffered to walk unveiled and unfettered. They had
been seeking this liberty for many years ; and now at last the day
of emancipation was beginning to dawn upon them." *
Proceedings in the House of Commons began with the exa-
mination of witnesses in Committee of the whole House. Two
former Governors-General were examined. Warren Hastings,
now an old man, was very cautious, and would not commit
himself to either approval or disapproval of missionaries, or of
the proposal for a bishop ; but, to be quite safe, he adopted the
familiar excuse that the time was not opportune. Then came
Lord Teignmouth. Let us hear Kaye's graphic account of his
examination : t — -
"The Committee seemed to know the kind of man tlmy had to deal
with, and assailed him at starting by putting an extreme case : ' Would
it be consistent with the security of the British Empire in India that
missionaries should preach pulilicly, with a view to tlie con\'ersion of the
Native Indians, that Mohaiumed is an impostor, or should speak in
opprobrious terms of the Brahmins, or their religious rites Y ' To this,
of course. Lord Teignmcmtli replied that tliere might be danger in such
indiscretion ; but that no one contemplated the conversion of the Natives
of India by such means ; and when, soon afterwards, the question was
put, ' Is j'our Lordship aware that an opinion prevails in India that it
is the intention of the British Government to take means to convert the
Natives of the country to the Christian religion ? ' he answered, without
a moment's hesitation, ' I never heard it or suspected it.' One would
have thought tliat there was little need after this to put the case
hypothetically ; but the witness was pi'esently asked whether, allowing
such an opinion to exist among the Natives, the appearance of a Bishop
on the stage would not increase the danger. ' I should think,' said
Lord Teignmouth, ' it would be viewed with perfect indifterence.'
Determined to work the hypothesis a little more, the Committee asked
him whether, ' were the Hindus possessed with an idea that we had an
intention of changing their religion and converting them into Christians,
it would be attended with any bad consequences at all ? ' 'I will
expatiate a little in my answer to that question,' said Lord Teignmovith ;
and he then delivered himself of the following explanation, the admirable
good sense of which is not to be surpassed by anything to be found in
the entire mass of evidence elicited, throughout the inquiry, upon all
the points of the Company's charter : —
" ' Both the Hindus and Mohammedans, subject to the British Govern-
ment in India, have had the experience of some years, that, in all the
public acts of that Government, every attention had been paid to their
prejudices, civil and religious, and that the freest toleration is allowed
* Christianity in India, p. 257.
t Ibid., p. 264.
Africa and India : Struggle and Vjctory 103
to them ; that there are many regulations of Government which prove Part TI.
the disposition oi Government to leave them perfectly free and un- 1786-1811.
molested in their religious ordinances ; and that any attempt at an Chap. 9.
infringement upon their religion or superstitions would be punished by
the Government of India. With that conviction, which arises from
experience, I do not apprehend that they would be brought to believe
that the Government ever meant to impose upon them the religion of
this country.'
" But the Committee had not yet done with their hypothesis, and were
determined not to let the witness, whatever might be his opinion of its
absurdity, escape without giving a direct answer ; so they assailed him
again by asking, 'Should the state of things be altered, and we not
observe the conduct we have hitherto observed, but introduce new modes
and enact new laws, for the carrying into effect the conversion of the
Natives to Chi-istianity, would not that be attended with disagreeable
consequences ? ' To this, of course, but one answer could be given ;
and Lord Teignmouth gave that answer, leaving the Committee to make
what use of it they could. ' If a law were to be enacted,' he said, ' for
converting the Natives of India to Christianity in such a manner as to
have the appearance of a compulsory law upon their consciences, I have
no hesitation in saying that, in that case, it would be attended with very
great danger.' Who eVer doubted it ? Who ever contended for anything
so preposterous — so insane ^ "
The Charter Bill introduced by Lord Castlereagh in 1813 was Charter
debated in Committee of the House of Commons on a series of
Eesolutions, and Nos. 12 and 13 showed that the Government,
after some hesitation and under considerable pressure, had re-
cognized the strength of feehng in the country. They were, in
fact, framed upon lines suggested by Will^erforce and the C.M.S.
Committee : —
" XII. Resolved. That it is the opinion of this Committee [i.e. of the
House of Commons] that it is expedient that the Church Establishment
in the British territ<iries in the East Indies should be placed under the
superintendence of a Bishop and three Archdeacons, and that adequate
provision should be made from the territorial revenues of India for their
maintenance.
" XIII. Resolved. That it is the opinion of this Committee that it is
the duty of this country to promote the interest and happiness of the
native inhabitants of the British d<iminions in India, and that such
measures ought to be adopted as may tend to the introduction among
them of useful knowledge and of religious and moral improvement.
That in the furtherance of the above ol)jects, sufficient facilities shall l)e
afforded by law to persons desirous of going to, and remaining in, India
for the purpose of accomplishing those benevolent designs.
" Provided always that the authority of the Local Governments
respecting the intercourse of Europeans with the interioi- of the country
be preserved, and that the principles of the British Government on
which the natives of In<lia have hitherto relied for the free exercise of
their religion be inviolably maintained."
No. 12 passed easily; but No. 13 led to long and heated
debates, certain Anglo-Indians and their sympathizers straining
every nerve to defeat it. One member, TNIr. Marsh, gave a glow-
ing description of the Hindus and of Hinduism, dwelling on " the
I04 Africa and India : Struggle and Victory
Part II. benignant and softening influences of religion and morality " that
^rnf ^^1^ prevailed in India, and expressing "horror at the idea of sending
ap^-- Qy^^ Baptists and Anabaptists to civilize and convert such a
people, at the hazard of disturbing or deforming institutions which
appeared to have been the means ordained by Providence of
making them virtuous and happy." Among the speakers on the
Christian side were the two Charles Grants, father and son, stand-
ing shoulder to shoulder in the cause of the Master they loved.
Wilberforce rose about midnight on June 22nd, and spoke for
two hours. " Nobody," wrote a hostile critic, " seemed fatigued :
all indeed were pleased, some with the ingenious artifices of his
manner, but most with the glowing language of his heart. Much
as I differed from him, it was impossible not to be delighted with
his eloquence." Early next morning he wrote to Mrs. Wilber-
victoryat forcc, — " Blcssed be God, we carried our question about three
this morning " ; and a few days later, " I heard afterwards that
many good men had been praying for us all night." The Bill
quickly followed the Eesolutions, and received the royal assent
on July 21st.''' In the autumn of that very year Napoleon was
totally defeated by the allied armies at Leipsic, and Wellington
drove Soult over the Pyrenees and linally delivered Spain from her
invaders. The East India Act came into force in the following
April ; and in that very month Napoleon was banished to Elba,
and peace proclaimed. " Them that honour Me I will honour."
Thus what Professor Seeley calls the period when Anglo-Indian
life was " brahvmiized" — when " the attempt was made to keep
India as a kind of inviolate paradise, into which no European,
and especially no missionary, should be suffered to penetrate —
came to an end," and " England prepared to pour into India the
civilization, the Christianity, and the science of the West." f
"And now," wrote Buchanan, "we are all likely to be dis-
what is to graced. Parliament has opened the door, and who is there to
° °^' go in? From the Church not one man!" It was too true.
Southey, in his Quarterly Eeviciu article five years before, had
taunted the Church, strong Churchman as he was, with the
remark that " the first step towards winning the Natives to our
religion was to show that we had one " ; and this remark was just
as applicable now. But the first two English clergymen for the
work were at this very time serving curacies ; and in 1815 they
landed in India, the pioneers of a long succession of able and
holy men. The first Bishop, too, was duly appointed in accordance
with the new Act, as we shall see by-and-by. Wilberforce was
not wrong when he wrote, after his great victory, " I am persuaded
that we have laid the foundation-stone of the grandest edifice that
ever was raised in Asia."
* The Sections of the Bill embodying in an enlarged form the Eesolutions
given above are printed at length in the C.M.S. Eeport of 1814.
"t" Ex-panaion of England, p. .310.
A PEEIOD OF DEVELOPMENT
1813-1824.
NOTE ON PAET III.
This Part is entitled " A Period of Development." The Society emerges
from its feeble infancy and moves forward with the vigour of youth.
Chap. X. describes a host of "forward steps "that marked the years
1812-18. Chap. XI. tells the story of the first Provincial Associations
and Deputations. In Chap. XII. we turn aside to notice other Societies,
both their work and progress and their relations with the C.M.S. In
particular we see the vei'y curious circumstances of the revival and
expansion of the S.P.G. in 1818. The next five chapters take us into
the Mission-field, and we read of the eai'ly trials and successes in West
Africa (XIII.), the deaths of faithful labourers there (XIII., XIV.) : the
commencement of work in North and South India (XV.), and in New
Zealand, Ceylon, &c. (XVI.) ; the Society's plans and efforts for the
revival of the ancient Eastern Churches (XVII.), both in the Turkish
Empire (as it was then) and in Travancore. Chap. XVIII., from the
standpoint of 1824, the date of Pratt's retirement, surveys the position
and prospects of the work at home and abroad, and shows how hard
experience had moderated the sanguine expectations of the early leaders
of Missions.
LORD GAMBIER.
REV. BASIL WOODD.
REV. JOSIAH PRATT.
REV. WILLIAM GOODE.
REV. T. T. BIDDULPH.
Admiral Lnnl fJiiniliier, Presiilent of C.M.S., 1812-1833.
Basil AVdddil, Minister (if I'.ciitiiicl-; ( 'liaiicl, Maryleljone ; Firsi "Deputation,"
Josiali I'ratt,' Scci'i'tai-y ..f C.-M.S., 1N()2-I.si'4.
William tloodc, liceLor ot St. Auiic'.s, itlackt'i-iars.
T. T. Eidclulpb, lucumbent of St. James's, Bristol.
CHAPTER X.
Forward Steps.
Signs and Causes of Coming Development — The President— New Rules
— Salisbury Square Annual Meetings and Sermons — Valedictory
Meetings— Public Affairs: Fall of Napoleon: State of the Country
— More Openings for Work— Translational Undertakings Samuel
Lee— Offers of Service Special Funds— The " Missionary Register."
" Sj'w/,- iinto the chUJrcn «f Israel, that then go forirard."- — Exod. xiv. 15.
|ROM time to time, in the history of the Church Mis- Part III.
sionary Society — as indeed of most other enterprises 1812-24.
— there have heen epochs marked hy very distinct P" "
advance, followed perhaps by periods of slower and
quieter progress. Such an epoch we find in the years epoch.
1812 — 1816. Before that time, the Society was but an infant.
In 1812-13, it seemed to shoot up suddenly into vigorous growth.
Not, indeed, in respect of what is after all the essential function
of a missionary society. Only three men were sent out in 1812,
all German mechanics ; and only one in 1813, an English school-
master. Not till 1815 did the first three English clergymen,
Greenwood, Norton, and Jowett, actually sail. Nevertheless,
these years were years of very marked advance in the influence
of the Society at home, and the interest of the Christian public in
Missions generally.
The infant Society had indeed heen growing all along, and there
had been signs of coming development. West Africa was no
longer the only field of lalwur. Samuel INIarsdcn had come home
from Australia on leave, and had induced the Society to plan a
settlement in New Zealand ; and he had gone back to his post
among the convicts, taking with him two mechanics to send to
the Maori cannibals. A Corresponding Committee had been
formed at Calcutta, and grants of money had l)een voted to it, for
translational purposes and to employ native readers. Above all,
Claudius Buchanan had come home from India, and had (as we
have before seen) been employing his vigorous and resourceful
mind in planning schemes for the evangelization of that great
dependency.
Then ca^ne Melville Home's sermon in 1811, which is in- J^rmoT^
disputably the most eloquent and moving of all those preached in
io8
Forward Steps
Appeal to
women.
Part III. the earlier years. Taking as a text the inspiring utterance of
1812-24. g^_ Paul, " I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth
Chap. 10. ^^g^,, -j^g denounced in bimiing words the backw^ardness of the
Church, and appealed for a courageous resolve to do the Lord's
will. "Away," he cried, "with the wretched cant of false
humility, ' We can do nothing.' " His exhortation was especially
to the clergy : why were they not pressing into the foreign field
themselves ? But in one notable passage he addressed wives and
mothers, and this, as the first appeal of the kind put forth in a
C.M.S. sermon, it will be interesting to quote here : —
" Christian Matrons ! from whoso endeared and endearing lips we first
heard of the wondrous Babe of Bethlehem, and were taught to bend our
knee to Jesus — ye who first taught these eagles how to soar, will ye now
check their flight in the midst of heaven ? * I am weary,' said tlie ambitious
Cornelia, ' of being called Scipio's Daughter. Do something, my sons, to
style me the Motlier of the Gracchi ' ! And what more laudable ambition
can inspire you than a desire to be the Mothers of the Missionaries,
Confessors, and Martyrs of Jesus? Generations imborn shall call you
blessed. The Churches of Asia and Africa., when they make grateful
mention of their founders, will say, ' Blessed be the wombs which bare
them, and the breasts which they have sucked ! ' Ye Wives, also, learn
to rejoice at the sound of the battle. Rouse the slumbering courage of
your soldiers to the field, and think no place so safe, so honoured, as the
Camp of Jesus. Tell the missionary story to your little ones, luitil their
young hearts burn, and in the spirit of those innocents who shouted
Hosanna to their lowly King, they cry, ' Shall not we also be the Mis-
sionaries of Jesus Christ ? ' '"
But while the pleading of Marsden and Buchanan for the South
Seas and India, and the eloquence of Melville Home, gave a
decided impetus to the Society, the two immediate causes of the
great steps forward at the epoch we are now to review were the
agitation for the opening of India to the Gospel and the journeys
of some of the clerical leaders all over the country to start Branch
Associations. The India movement began, as we have seen,
with the holding of a public meeting attended by four hundred
gentlemen, the largest the Society had yet held ; and it at once
showed the world that a powerful institution was springing up.
The Deputation movement raised the Society's income in one
year from £3000 to £13,000 This latter movement will be
described in a separate chapter
The year 1812 witnessed several forward steps in the home
administration of the Society. Up to this time there had been no
President. Now Admiral Lord Gambler w^as appointed. He was
one of the most distinguished of naval officers at a period
memorable for brilliant examples of naval skill. In 1807 he com-
manded the naval squadron to which the Danish fleet (then under
Buonaparte's control) surrendered and, in 1809, the Channel fleet
which defeated and partially destroyed the French ships opposed to
it ; for the first of which services he received a peerage, and for the
second the thanks of both Houses of ParUament. When Thomas
The first
President,
Forward Steps ioq
Scott was at the Lock Chapel, the Admiral was one of his flock ; Part m
and he was a Governor and hearty friend of the new Society from 1812-24.
the very first. As the Society's work and responsibilities grew, it Chap. 10.
was necessarily brought much into contact with the Government,
— indeed much more than it is now, when the liberty of individuals,
or of companies or societies, to engage in enterprises of all sorts
all over the world, is so much greater than it was then ; and in
the absence of recognition by the bishops, the Society had to look
to laymen of position to represent it. At the Anniversary of 1812,
therefore, not only was a President appointed in the person of
Lord Gambler, but sixteen Vice-Presidents also, including four
peers and eight memliers of parliaincnt. Among tlu.'se were Lord p^elidlnVs.
Teignmouth, formerly (as Sir John Shoie) Governor-General of
India, and now President of the liii)le Society ; Sir Thomas
Baring, father of Bishop Baring, and of Lord Northbrook ;
Thomas Babington,^:^ the intimate friend of Wilbeiforce, after
whom Zachary Macaulay named the son who was by-and-ljy to
become so famous ; and Nicholas Vansittart, who became, only
three weeks later, Chancellor of the ExcJiequer, succeeding INIr.
Perceval, who was shot dead in the lobby of the House of
Connnons on May 9th. Perceval himself, who was Premier as
well as Chancellor, and a man of high character and (in a sense
uncommon in those days) irreproachable life, had himself shown
courtesy and kindness to the Society more than once. So did
Lord Liverpool, who succeeded him as Premier ; and so did Earl
Bathurst, who at the same time became Secretary for the Colonies.
Vansittart, while Chancellor of the Exchequer, and afterwards as
Lord Bexley, spoke at the Annual Meetings. Without the favour The need
of the Ministers, many of the Society's early enterprises would '^°''^*'^'"-
not have been possible. Missionaries frequently had passages
granted them in Government ships ; and those proceeding to
Colonies, like Sierra Leone, or Ceylon, or New South Wules, had
to take letters of couunendation from the Colonial Office in
London. Tiiose for India had of course to get leave from the
East India Company. A President, therefore, had important
functions in those days ; and Lord Gambler, who held the oflice
twenty years, proved far more than a figure-head. He took an
active part, not only in high official negotiations, but in the
ordinary labours of the Committee. It is almost needless to add
that in this respect he has been imitated by his two successors,
the Earl of Chichester and Sir John Kemiaway.
In the same year, 181'2, the Society's Laws were revised. The Open con-
most important alteration was in tiie constitution of the Com- theSo"iety^
mittee. Hitherto it had consisted of clergymen and laymen in
equal numbers. Now the twenty-four elected nitanbers were all
to be laymen ; but all subscribing clergymen were to be members
* Father of Canon .John Babinyton, und uncle of C. C. Babkugton, Professor
of Botany at Cambriilge.
no Forward Steps
Part III. likewise/'' This was the constitution previously invented by
1812-24. Pratt for the Bible Society,! and it was now adopted for the
Chap. 10. Q}-(^^j.g]-^ Missionary Society. One cannot but admire the courage
and faith of the Society in adopting such a constitution. The new
law practically put it at the mercy of whatever party in the Church
might choose to take advantage of the position to secure a majority.
From that day to this there has been nothing whatever in the
laws of the Society to prevent its principles and methods of action
being entirely changed. Membership in the Church of England
is the sole qualification for the governing body. It is needless to
say that those Churchmen who are not in accord with the distinc-
tive Evangelical principles, doctrinal and ecclesiastical, wdiich
have ever guided the Society, have always been a inajority among
the clergy. Why have they never exerted the powder the laws
give them, qualified themselves for the Committee by a half-guinea
subscription, and come and out-voted the old members ? John
Henry Newman, who was at one time an active member of the
Oxford Church Missionary Association, did think of planning such
a conp.X We have no ground for blaming him : he was as much
a member as any one else, and had a perfect right to get the views
he honestly held adopted if he could. But a Society has traditions
as well as laws ; and although the Church Missionary Society's
laws say nothing whatever about Evangelical doctrines or
principles or methods, every one knows that these are in fact, and
have been from the first, the life of the Society ; and it is greatly
to the credit of the clergy generally that they have always, with
the honourable fairness of English gentlemen, recognized its
traditions, and, while not always approving of its proceedings,
have abstained from interfering with them. Still more con-
spicuously generous is the conduct of those bishops who, though
not in accord with the Society's traditions, are willing to be
identified with it by membership and by the acceptance of the
office of Vice-President. But the day for episcopal recognition of
this kind had not come at the time we are now reviewing. In
1815, however. Bishop Bathurst of Norwich and Bishop Ryder of
Gloucester, the first on the Bench to do so, gave their names to
the Society as Vice-Presidents.
The Com- To revert to the amended laws of 1812. Two Committees sub-
ordinate to the General Committee already existed, viz. (1) of
Correspondence, to receive and train missionary candidates, and
to administer the Society's foreign work,§ and (2) of Accounts,
«
* At the General Meeting in May, it was only provided tliat clerical
members of the Society might attend the Committee, but as tliis proved a
privilege which they did not appreciate, anothei' General Meeting was held
in December, and the law was altered to Tuake them full voting members.
t See p. 152.
X So Henry Venn says. See Chapter XXXVI.
§ Three years later, the Committee of Coi-rospondence was divided into
four sections, viz., (1) Africa, (2) India and Ceylon, (3) New Zealand, (4)
Forward Steps hi
the name of which sufficiently explains its functions. Two others Part 11 [.
were now added, viz., (3) of Patronage, to nominate Vice-Presi- 1S12-24.
dents and otherwise ohtain the support of influential persons, and ^^^\^- l*^-
(4) of Funds, to circulate missionary information and devise "
measures for obtaining contrilnitions. One more new law may be
mentioned. The Committee were empowered to appoint persons
who had " rendered essential service to the Society "to be
Honorary Governors or Members for Life. Acting on this law, Hon. Life
they soon opened the list of Hon. Life Governors by placing on °°v""°''s-
it four names, viz., Thomas Scott, Claudius Buchanan, Basil
Woodd, and the Kev. J. Jtenicke of the Berlin Seminary ; '■'• and
two years later they added the names of Goode, Burn, }3iddulph,
and J)aniel Wilson, of the liome clergy; Sanuiel Marsden, the
Australian cliaplain ; and Corrie, Thomason, and Thompson,
Indian chaplains, i
The year 1812 also saw a small foreshadowing of the future The first
Church Missionary House. Up to this time the Committee meet- °'^''"*
ings had been held, as before mentioned, in Mr. Goode's Rectory ;
and the "office" was in Pratt's house in Doughty Street. In
January, 1812, a room for Committee meetings was hired at Mr.
Seeley's bookselling shop at 169, Fleet Street ; | but Pratt con-
tinued to do his own official work at home. In the following vear
it became necessary to provide a regular office, and No. 14, Salis-
bury Square w^as rented, the Committee meeting there for the first
time on December 13th, 1813. Subsequently it became the
residence of an Assistant Secretary, with quarters for missionary
candidates ; office, college, and Secretary's house being thus under
one roof.j The hours were nine to seven, for Secretary, Assistant
Secretary, and clerks. In 1820, a house in Barnsbury Park was
taken for the Assistant Secretary and students ; and No. 14,
Salisbury Square l^ecame an office only.
Mpclitenaneaii and lloiiie. Thus the " Group " system of recent years was
anticipated. So alao was the modern "precis " systoin. Tlie despatches we're
to be "abstracted and indexed" for the use of the Conmiittee.
* .John Venn was on his deatli-bed at the time, or doubtless his name would
have been added. He died July Ist, 1813.
t Tbis List has grown in subsequent years, until, in 1882, it was arranged
to limit it to one hundred names ; and now, year by year, much interest is
taken in the selection of names to till up" vacancies. The authority to
appoint Hon. Life Memlicrg was not made use of until 1888, when it was
availed of to find a place for ladies.
X Messrs. Seeley afterwards moved to the other side of Fleet Street.
No. lOit became the olHce of the liecunl newspaper, and for some years
its upper floors were occupied by the Church of England Sunday School
Institute.
§ Many readers will remember that by the side of the CM. House as it
was in lHS;i there was a small, old-fashioned Scotch hotel. That hotel was
No. 14, which had been occupied by the Society from 1813 to 18H2. In 1862
it was given up for the large new House erected hard by. Jn 1883 it was
pnrcha.sed, pulled down, and a new wing to the existing Honse built on the site.
The east end of the present large Committee-room, therefore, is the identical
spot where the Committee met for the first time in 1813.
112 Forward Steps
Part III. That resident Assistant Secretary was Edward Biclversteth.
1812-24. He did not come into the Society's service until 1815, and w^e
Chap. 10. g^^^j xnQQi him in another chapter, before that time, at Norwich ;
Ed^^^ but this seems a convenient place to introduce him, as hisappoint-
Bicker- meut was assuredly one of the steps foi-ward which we are now
tracing out. At this time he was a solicitor at Norwich, in
partnership with his wife's brother, Mr. T. Bignold. He had
been educated for his profession in London, and while there
had taken some interest in INIissions. He had heard Claudius
Buchanan's Annual Sermon, and read Buchanan's writings,
which had opened, he writes, " a new scene of the vast impor-
tance of studying in every way to promote the Gospel of Christ."
" By the grace of God," he adds, " I will bend my soul more and
more to this glorious end. I may do much more by self-denial.
My Saviour died for me, and shall I not alistain from luxuries for
His Gospel?" Thus began a career which afterwards gave the
Church Missionary Society a Secretary, and in later years gave a
bishop to Exeter in his son, a bishop to Japan in his grandson,
and at least five missionaries to India and Africa in a daughter, a
grand-daughter, and three grandsons."-
More To resume. The Anniversaries were now becoming much
sermons, morc important and interesting. St. Anne's Church was crowded
at the Sermons. Even in 1810, Buchanan estimated that two
thousand persons were present. In 1812, the preacher was Mr.
Goode, the Eector, himself ; and in 1813, the Eev. W. Dealtry,
Fellow of Trinity, Cambridge, and also F.E.S. He was mathe-
matical professor at the East India Company's College, and just
then was at Clapham, serving the parish church for John Venn.
Venn died in the same year, and Dealtry succeeded him as Eector.
In 1814, the first dignitary of the Church to preach for the
Society occupied the pulpit. This was the Hon. and Eev. Henry
Dudley Eyder, Dean of Wells, who in the following year became
Bishop of Gloucester, the first decided Evangehcal raised to the
Episcopal Bench. Dean Eyder's sermon will come before us
again presently. Then in 1815, the Eev. E. T. Vaughan of
Leicester (father of Dean C. J. Vaughan) was the preacher.
He was one of the ablest of the Evangelical clergy, and his work
for the missionary cause at Leicester l^ecame a pattern to be
pointed to for imitation ; but he subsequently adopted strange
views. In 1816, a s_econd representative of India was selected,
another of the godly chaplains whom Simeon had sent out,
and whose names should be had in everlasting remembrance
— Daniel Corrie. His text, Isa. xliv. 20, was suggested by
his personal experiences of Indian religion — " He feedeth on
ashes : a deceived heart hath turned him aside, that he cannot
deliver his soul nor say. Is there not a lie in my right hand?"
* Mrs. E. Durrant, Miss E. B. Darrant, Rev. H. B. Duriant, Dr, Albert R.
Cook, Dr. J. H. Cook.
Forward Steps 113
Very moving is his account of the misery and hopelessness of the Part lir.
Hmdu. This, let it be remembered, was at a time when suttee, 1812-24.
child-murder, and other crimes were rife, which have since been ^^^P- ^^•
abolished by law.
Corrie's was the last Sermon preached at St. Anne's, Blackfriars.
In 1817, Daniel Wilson began the long series of Sermons at First Ser-
St. Bride's, Fleet Street.- He was at that time Minister of st°"BHde-s
bt. John's Chapel, Bedford Row, having succeeded Cecil in 1809.
He was an active member of the Committee, both in its delibera-
tions in London, and in preaching and speaking over the country ;
and he continued so after he became Vicar of Islington in 1824^
and until his appointment to the Bishopric of Calcutta in 1832.'
His St. Bride's sermon, on the words, " Lift up your eyes, and look
on the fields," is remarkable for its comprehensive survey of the
world, and of the Missions actually carried on. Other preachers
had enunciated principles : he sets forth facts. And the appeal Appeal to
to "the younger clergy" at the end is something quite new :— ^fergf '
"Listen to the call ! Think, and think again, on the question.
Do not mistake cowardice and indolence for humility." To which
succeeds a passage which could only with partial truth be spoken
even now; and then it was an ideal representation of the fact
indeed :— " Say not that your parents and friends discountenance
your design. You mistake their meaning. They intend only to
try your constancy. ... All the Church accounts those famihes
blessed who give a son to this cause." When this ideal repre-
sentation IS reahzed, the EvangeHzation of the World will not be
very far off !
The Anniversary Meetings at this time changed their character • Annual
a,nd the change marks another forward step. In 1813, for the '""'"*'"^"'
first time, ladies attended ; and instead of a formal gathering of a
hundred gentlemen to do necessary business, six hundi-ed members
crowded the large room in the New London Tavern. For the
first time, a President presided. For the first time, important
speeches were made, by Wilberforce, Simeon, Dean Ryder, and
others. But it was not an Anniversary Meeting that was to
engage for the first time what was then the regular place for great
London gatherings, Freemasons' Hall. It was a Valedictory And Vaie-
Dismissal that took the Society to that historic building This '^'=t°0'-
was on January 7th, 1814, and the occasion was a great event
mdeed. The first four missionaries for India were taken leave of
Rhenius, Schnarre, Greenwood, and Norton ; and these last two
were the first clergymen of the Church of England to go to Asia
definitely as missionaries.! The other two, like the SPCK
men and like the C.M.S. men in Africa, were in Lutheran orders.
Lord Gambler presided ; Wilberforce and Henry Thornton spoke,
1 QOQ^*- "^"u®^ "^^^ ^^®" "®®^ ^^^^ since, except in 1823, 1&31, 1832, and
i«dd, in which years respectively fotir other City churches received the
Society.
t With one exception not usuallv reckoned. See p f 3
VOL. I. " J
114
Forward Steps
Part III,
1812-24.
Chap. 10.
Crowds
attending.
The pro-
ceedings
improved.
and also a young Fellow of St. John's, Cambridge, who was to be
a power m after years, John W. Cunningham of Harrow. Pratt
delivered the Instructions, and a masterly address, written by
Buchanan, was read for him (he being ill) by Dealtry. Some
fifteen hundred people attended ; and for the first time tickets of
various colours were used, and members of the Committee acted as
stewards. Greenwood and Norton did not sail for more than a
year after ; but Ehenius and Schnarre proceeded at once to
Portsmouth to join an East Indiaman, a passage by which had
been granted by the Company. Portsmouth friends had before
been privileged to see the last of missionaries ; and this time an
enthusiastic lady there wrote to Pratt, —
" They brought the apostolic age forciV)ly before me, and T tlaouglit of
lianiabas and Paul, and could not help saying to myself, Sureljf the
barbarous people will call dear Mr. Rhenius ' Mercurius.' Dear Sir,
what highly-privileged days are these !
All the promises do travail
With a glorious day of grace."
The Committee did not venture to engage Freemasons' Hall for
the next Anniversary ; but in 1815 they did so, and were rewarded
by an attendance as crowded as at the Dismissal. Wilberforce
in particular, wrote Pratt, "carried away with him, even more
than usual, the hearts of his hearers by a full stream of Christian
feeling and sublime piety"; and James Stephen, " in a style of
grand and vehement eloquence, made an indelible impression."
The numbers of friends desiring to attend the annual gatherings
now increased year by year ; and in 1817 tickets were issued to
members only. As, however, nearly two thousand were at once
applied for, some hundreds failed to get into the hall ; and Pratt
expresses, in some comments he wrote at the time, the wish that
a building might be erected to hold 3000 people, and so constructed
that all should hear with ease. Exeter Hall was then yet in
the future. Not till 1831 was it ready for the Anniversaries.
Another difficulty that was growing was the length of the Eeport
to be read ; and in 1819 it was arranged to read an Abstract only.
But even the Abstract " occujned nearly tivo hours"; and five I re
speeches followed. And it must be remembered that the Meeting
at this time did not begin till noon, the Sermon haring been
preached the same morning at 10 a.m. The Monday Evening
"Service did not begin till 1821. It is true that there was no
meeting on the Tuesday evening ; yet still it must have been a
fresh and living interest that brought crowds to gatherings of such
length. There were no missionaries to tell thrilling stoi'ies of
converts. There were almost no converts to tell about. No one
asked, What are the results ? They met to do the will and the
work of the Lord they loved ; and they rejoiced to do it.
One other development in the Meetings of this period is worth
noting. In the early years, all the Eesolutions, except the one
FoRii^ARD Steps
II
^vhlch adopted the Report, were votes of thanks to all sorts of Part III
people, patrons and committee-men, treasurers and secretaries 1H12-24.'
preachers and speakers ; and the natural result was that the ^^^^P- ^^■
speeches tended to flow into the channel of mutual admiration.
ihe plan of carefully framing the Eesolutions to refer to the
events and cn-cumstances of the year seems to have heen invented
My \ au^dian of Leicester, and it was at once highly praised hy
i ratt, and recommended for general adoption. "The usual
motions of thaiiks," he says, " might be consolidated, in order to
give tmie for Eesolutions declaratory of the mind of the Meeting
on the rea husmess of the Society." Some later remarks of his
suggested hy the various May Anniversaries of 1817 are wortli
quoting, and worth digesting : —
'j A very improved .spirit lui.s prevailed. Tlicre has heen less mingling
<.f hnnum inl.rnuty with the work of Go<l-less of mutual praise-a more
devout and heavenly spir.t--more unfeigned aflection toward other
ChristiHiKs in their exertions - and a more .singh, eve to th<> glory of G..d
^^e urge it on all our Chri.stian brethren t.. invoke the ..ntponrinrr ..f a
granou.s influence on tluMnind.s of ineaehers, .speakers, and hearer.s that
a pure fire may he kindled and cherished, which .shall difliise itself on 111
sides and warm every heart; and we advi.se such a modilieation of the
Kesohit.ons a.s may rather lead the .sp.-akers and the audience into an
lie hgent view of the various objects and measures of the Societies,
than to search out and listen to some ingenious form of paying com-
phments one to another. * 1^1^111^ com
Other Valedictory Meetings were held from time to time ; and
one of them calls for special notice. On October 28th, 1817 no
less than eight ordained Englishmen were taken leave of, with
two Lutheran clergymen and six wives, sixteen in all, jioin'- to P'k*""
four different parts of the world, viz., Collier \ and Decke? to laUcnT/ave
Africa Connor to the Levant, Joseph Fenn, Henry Baker, and °^-
Barenhruck to India; Knight, Lamhrick, Mayor, and Ward, to
. -Q?"*!. A^ ''''^ another great occasion. There was a service
at St. Brides, at which J. W. Cunningham preached, on the
singularly suitable words, " Though I am sometime airaid, vet put
I my trust m Thee '• (P.B.V. of Ps. Ivi. 3). Freemasons' H^Ul
was crowded for the IMeeting, over which Lord Gambier presided
Iratt read the Instructions— again admirable; and then four
missionaries (Collier, Connor, Fenn, Lamhrick), representing the
four fields, replied m behalf of themselves and their brethren —
a plan rarely followed in after years, until, quite recentlv, the lar-e
numbers going out have necessitated its revival The \ddress
was given by Charles Simeon. t The collection was £111, and
two £oO_ donations were sent in afterwards as thankofferings for
such a sight. One clergyman wrote, aUuding to the death Sf the
1 rincess Charlotte, which had just plunged the whole countrv into
griel,— "At this moment of national sorrow, and perhajps of
* Missionari/ Re<ii.-<fcr, 1.S17. p. lf)7.
t Mr. Collier went as chaplain to Sierra Loone. Sec p. 163
+ Printed, with the Iiistrucrion.«>, in ihe lieport of 1818.
I 2
lib
Forward Steps
Part III.
1812-24.
Chap. 10.
Events in
Europe :
Over-
throw of
Napoleon.
national chastisement, may Institutions like these be om' safeguard
and defence ! "
The great European events at this period could not fail to affect
the feelings and utterances of the Society's advocates. Englishmen
were called upon to show their gratitude to the God of battles and
of nations by spreading His Gospel. Napoleon's Grand Army
had perished on the frozen plains of Eussia in 1812, and in the
autumn of 1813, when the first C.M.S. deputations were travelling
over England, the Allied forces on the Continent were pressing the
great usurper back on to the French frontier, while Wellington
was clearing Spain of the invaders and driving them back across
the Pyrenees. " Surely," writes a Huddersfield clergyman in
a paper circulated after Basil Woodd's visit, " the wonderful
interposition of Divine Providence in behalf of our nation at this
awful crisis wdll excite the members of the Established Church
to exert themselves in promoting the increase of the Eedeemer's
Kingdom." A Liverpool clergyman writes, " What glorious
intelligence ! How thankful we should be to the Great Arbiter
of nations for His ' mighty hand and stretched-out arm ' in
breaking the yoke of the oppressor ! May it stimulate us to
renewed efforts ! " A hymn composed at the time, and sung at
the first Bristol Anniversary in the following year, contains this
verse : —
Amidst our isle, exalted high,
Do Thou our glory stand ;
And like a wall of guardian fire
Surround Thy fav'rite land.
That the " isle exalted high " might prove worthy of being the
Divine " favourite " was one aim of the missionary advocates.
The Annual Eeport presented in May, 1814, just after the banish-
ment of Napoleon to Elba, opens by calling attention to the " new
and extraordinary circumstances " of the country : —
" After two-and-twenty years of bitter animosity, or of treacherous
peace more injurious than open war, the good providence of Him Who
doeth after the counsel of His own will has brought within our reach that
state of repose for which wo often and earnestly prayed, but under
mournful forebodings that it was removed to a distance incalculable. A
generation has grown up under the din of arms. The youth and early
manhood of our children have been familiarised with tales of infamy and
of blood. The whole frame of human society in this more civilized part of
the world has been disorganized. One of the most powerful and refined
of nations was making rapid and systematic strides toward a state of
barbarism. All the varied occupations which form the peculiar character
of civilized life were likely soon to be absorbed in those of the cultivator
and the soldier — of the man who should till the ground in order to feed
another who might disturb and oppress the world. But the good
providence of God has rescued Europe from this enormous evil, and, by
means which so distinctly mark His irresistible hand, that even the
thoughtless are compelled to exclaim, '■ Verily there is a God that judgeth
the earth ! ' "
Dean Dudley Eyder, the preacher on that same day, must have
Forward Steps 117
startled the congregation when he gave out his text, and no doubt Part III.
stirred their deepest emotions too — " Thou hi'test me up above 1812-24.
those that rise up against me : Thou hast dehvered me from the ^'^^P- 1^-
violent man (' man of violence,' viarg.). Therefore will I give The "man
thanks unto Thee, O Lord, among the Heathen, and sing praises ^*^^'°",,
unto Thy name." " Behold," said the Dean, " our deliverance,
even from the Man of Violence. Behold our Deliverer, even
the Mighty Jehovah. And behold in the Society for which
I plead the humble instrument of accomplishing our purpose of
gratitude."
It is difficult for us to realize the intensity of hatred and indig-
nation with which England regarded Buonapai'te. Two facts
incidentally but significantly recorded in the Society's publica-
tions at the time may illustrate what cause there was for it.
(1) Before his invasion of Eussia, he told the Russian Ambassador
that he would destroy that empire. "Man proposes," was the
reply, "but God disposes." "Tell your master," thundered
Napoleon, " I am he that proposes, and I am he that disposes."
(2) He did invade Eussia ; he returned, leaving the bulk of his
vast army dead upon its frozen plains ; and the official returns
of the Eussian authorities showed that they had had to hum
213, olG French corjises and 95,810 chad Jiorses. It w^as to
Englishmen horrified by such impiety and such shocking results
of unbridled ambition, that the good Dean appealed in his
memorable Sermon.
In the following year, 1815, when Napoleon, having escaped
from Elba, again threatened Europe, the Committee opened their
Eeport by adverting, with deep regret, to the disappointment
of these anticipations. " The portentous gloom which seemed
scattered by the Divine Hand is again gathering round. The
threatening clouds are again darkening the heavens, and a dread
night of horrors seems fast coming upon this fair portion of our
world." Within seven weeks of these words being read, the Peace at
"mighty Hand and outstretched Arm" once more intervened, '^^^'
and the crowning victory of Waterloo ushered in the thirty years'
peace. The unhappy two years' war w^ith the United States had
already come to an end, and Yaughan of Leicester, in the Sermon
of 1815, had exclaimed, " May Britain and America, now re-united,
know no other rivalry than the rivalry of effoi'ts to bless the
world ! ' '
But the internal state of the country was bv no means State of the
p 11. 1 c /-ii • • • mi . country.
lavourable to appeals for Christian enterprises. The increase
of wealth during the war had, indeed, been enormous. England
had for a time possessed the colonies of France, Spain, and
Holland; "manufactures profited by the great discoveries of
Watt and Arkwright ; and the consumption of raw cotton in the
mills of Lancashire rose from fifty to a hundred millions of
pounds." At the same time, agriculture was in a state of
"feverish and unhealthy prosperity," the price of wheat rising
1 1 8 Forward Steps
Part III. to £5 per quarter. But the new wealth was not evenly dis-
1812-24. ti'ibuted : both the introduction of machinery and the high prices
^P" ■ of produce, while enriching the few, reduced multitudes to ruin ;
and the rapid increase of population increased the difficulty of
the position, while the distress was enhanced by the pressure of
the now enormous national debt, exceeding 800 millions sterling,
and of the immense yearly expenditure, — the budget of 1815
being for ninety millions, a figure only again reached within
quite recent years, when the population has doubled, and the
wealth of the country increased almost beyond calculation.
Pauperism was rife to an extent inconceivable ixi these days : for
instance, at one time, every third person in Birmingham was a
pauper ; and the poor-rate rose fifty per cent. Kiots broke out,
which were only suppressed by military force ; " and with the
increase of poverty followed its inevitalale result, the increase of
crime." * It was in the midst of a social condition like this that
the small fraction of the nation that could look beyond material
interests and care for the Eternal Lord and His Kingdom was
being summoned to a holy war in His name.
Nevertheless, the proclamation of peace had filled all hearts
New hopes with joy ; and the Committee fully believed that a wide extension
and plans, ^f ^j^g Society's operations would be the result. Dean Eyder
expressed their feelings in the Sermon already referred to : —
" All the signs and circumstances of the times concur with the
stupendous event of our deliverance to press this great duty, the object
of the Society, upon your minds. The weapons of our warfare seem to
have been preparing by gradual and almost silent operation, till the
luoment is at last arrived, and the feeling and priuciijle communicated,
by which these weapons sliould be wielded for the conversion of the
world, the fultilment t>f the primary design of creation, the consumma-
tion of redeeming love."
And five years after this, in the Keport of 1819, the Committee
were still full of the same thoughts. " We are labouring," they
said, "in a Pacified World! The sword is beaten into the
ploughshare and the spear into the pruning-hook."
For some time, the eyes of the Committee had been directed to
the East, where the Oriental Churches still kept the lamp of
Christianity burning — albeit feebly and dimly — amid the darkness
and tyranny of Islam ; and now that the Mediterranean was no
longer continually traversed by hostile fleets, the way was open
for a Mission to the Levant. Of that enterprise a future chapter
will tell. Here it need only be noticed tluit William Jowett,
Fellow of St. John's, Cambridge, and Twelfth Wrangler in 1812,
sailed for Malta with a special connnission from the Society about
two mouths after the ]3attl(! of Waterloo. Kussian Tartary, and
Persia, were also pressed upon the attention of the Committee,
* Partlj' from Green's Short History of the Eiujiiah People, chap, x., sect. -i.
FoRii 'A R D Steps i i Q
aiul Astrachan, on the Caspian, seriously considered as an inviting Part^ HI.
city ior a cential station; bufthe Ediiihurgli Society was already Jj^^""^"J;
in occupation of it. Ceylon was much upon their mind, and an "^P"
active correspondence had been t,'oing on with the excellent
Chief Justice, Sir Alexander Johnston, who presently, on his
return to I'^ngland, became a Vice-President of the Society. The
two English clergymen who, as before stated, were the first
missionaries of the Society, and of the Church of England, to
India, were originally designated to Ceylon. With the West
Indies, also, the Committee were in correspondence, — Mr. W.
Dawes, the former Governor of Sierra Leone, who had for a few
months undertaken the training, at his house in Buckingham-
shire, of the early German missionaries, being now resident at
Antigua ; and a call also came from Honduras, in Central
America; wliile, all this time, Africa and India occupied the
largest share of attention, and the openings in distant New
Zealand gave promise of a rich harvest of souls.
Literary and translational work also occupied much time and Literary
thought at this period, and a prominent place in the Annual ^°'''''
Ki'poits. The Bible Society was for the most part engaged in
printing and circulating the Scriptures in English and in the
Continental languages ; while a considerable part of the similar
work, and still more, the preparation of tracts. Ac, and the
translation of the Prayer-book, in Asiatic and African tongues,
was undertaken iiy the Church Missionary Society. There were
in hand the Old' and New Testaments in Syriac, portions of
Scripture in Malay, and some of the Gospels in two West African
languages, Susoo and BuUom ; also parts of the Prayer-book in
.\rabic, Persian, Hindustani, and Bullom ; and various tracts,
catechisms, &c., in some of these languages. ISIodern Greek, and
Maltese, and even Italian publications were taken in hand, in
coimexion with the Society's plans for the Levant; and a newly-
discovered MS. of the Scriptures in Ethiopic, the ecclesiastical
language of the Abyssinian Church, was edited and printed. In
particular, the Committee were very keen upon completing the
important works in Hindustani and Persian left unlinished by Specially
Henry Martyn. They actually had a new fount of type made to •"■ "■^'"*
reproduce tiie Persian character more exactly, paid for it out of
C.M.S. funds, and placed it at the disposal of tiie Bible Society.
Special mention is made of one work accomplished, not by
the Society, but in Russia, viz., the printing of Henry Martyn's
Persian New Testament, which had been received by the Persian
Mohammedans willi eagerness, and even by the Shah himself.
Thus, said the seventeenth Report. " the dear Martyn, though dead,
was still preaching the Gospel to that numerous people." He
himself, indeed, was not forgotten in Persia. Tlie testimony of
English travellers is from time to time adduced in the Society's
publications. One, Captain Gordon, is cited as saying, *' You
little think how generally the English Moollah, Martyn, is
Christians.
1 20 Forward Steps
Part III. known throughout Persia, and with what affection his memory is
1812-24. cherished." *
lap^ . j^ ^^^^g j^^. ^^,^^^ q£ ^j^-g ]^i^;^(j ^}^y^l; |-]^g Society took up that
Samuel remarkable young man, Samuel Lee. He was a carpenter's
^^^- apprentice at Shrewsbury, who, while working at his trade, had
acquired a knowledge of Latin, Greek, Hebrew, Syriac, Arabic,
Persian, and Hindustani, before he was twenty-five years of age.
He came under the notice of Buchanan, who introduced him to
Pratt ; and the Committee arranged for him to go to Cambridge
at the Society's expense.! There he quickly made his mark as a
scholar, and for some years he was employed by the C.M.S. Com-
mittee, and called "the Society's Orientalist." His name, and
the works upon which he .was engaged, frequently occur in the
Eeports of this period. He afterwards became Professor of
Arabic and Canon of Bristol.
co^nti-° Another task undertaken by the Society after the Peace w^as
nentai the rousing of the Protestant Churches of the Continent to take a
share in missionary work. In the Eeport of 1816 the Committee
say :—
" The return of Universal Peace opening the friendly intercourse
which all true Christians in the world will ever desire to maintain, the
Committee have availed themselves of the opportunity to diffuse in-
formation on the subject of Missions, and to offer to Foreign Protestants
every practicable degree of co-operation. . . . They have opened an
intercourse with a Missionary Institution established at Basle, and they
will render every aid in their power to any other Societies which may
rise among the Foreign Churches. The return of Peace has brought
many Colonies again luider the power of the Continental States ; and
your Committee trust that the Christians of those States will unite and
exert themselves in diffusing, in and around these Colonies, the blessings
of the Gospel. The Missions of the Danes in India have long lan-
guished for aid. The Kingdom of the Netherlands has an extensive
tield for exertion in the Eastern Archipelago ; and the vast countries
of Northern Asia are opening themselves before the other States of the
Continent."
Among instances of practical help given in accordance with these
designs, may be mentioned the temporary carrying on of the
Danish Mission schools at Tranquebar in South India, and a grant
of £100 to the new Basle Seminary, which had been founded by
some Christians in that city as a thankoflering for its preservation
from threatened disaster and ruin in the last year of the Great
War. I It is also a striking and little-known fact that the
* Missionary Register, January, 1821, p. 36.
t It is a curious fact that one of the first uses to which the newly-hired
liouse in Salisbury Square was ])ut was to receive Lee's family while he was
at Cambridge, " as the most economical means of providing for them."
+ The contending armies were on opposite sides of the town. Bombs were
thrown into it. Suddenly (said Mr. Blumhardt, the Director, at a C.M.S.
meeting at Cambridge in 1822), " the Lord of the elements sent a very strong
east wind, and the bombs were exhausted in the air before they could reach
our homes." — Missionary Register, June, 1822.
Forward Steps I-2I
Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Epis- Part III.
copal Church of America owes its origin to suggestions made by (.^^^^'^j^J;
Pratt to some of the bishops of that Church, as will be seen J_
hereafter.
In fact, in the Eighteenth Year, as Dr. Mears observes,* "the
wide reach of the Society, nerved, as it were, by the strength and
energy of youth, seemed suddenly to embrace the whole world. ^,^Jf/e^'^
The Society saw before it the prospect, not only of bringing
civilization to West Africa and New Zealand, of diffusing education
throughout India and Ceylon, and of aiding evangelization in all
these countries and in the Mohammedan world ; not only of
awakening missionary interest among Churchmen in America,
and of reviving evangelistic zeal among the Protestants of Europe;
but also of assisting in the recovery from tlieir long sleep of the
ancient Syrian and Greek Churches.'" Well might the Committee
exclaim, " Who is sullicient for these things? " And well might
they "affectionately urge the duty of intercession on all the
members of the Society," informing them that they themselves
were now meeting every Saturday evening to " invoke the blessing
of God on all their plans and proceedings."
And in tlie Eeport of 1818, they survey the position in sti-iking
language : —
" In the adoption of those Missions, the Committee were led by
degrees, as tlie Piovidcnice of God opened opportunities before them.
No Society could hiive at once planned sucli a series and system of
Mis.sions; ami it is no small satisfaction to your Committee to review,
in this respect, the steps of tlits Society, and to see how God luis
graciously led it forward, as l)y the hand, and fixed it in positions most
favourably situated for iuHuence on the }*Iohammedan and Heathen
World.
"On the review of these Missions it will be seen that the Society has
to deal witli man in almost every stage of civilization ; from the nol)le
but micultivuted New Zealander, upward through the more; civilized
African, and the still more relined Hindoo, to the acute and half-
tMdightened Mohanunedan, and the different gradations in which
Christianity is enjoyed by the Abyssinian, the Syrian, and the Grei-k
Churches.
"These varied shades of light and civilization require all the varied
means and instruments which the Society is now calling into action :
from the blacksmith, the rope-maker, the l)oat-l)uilder, and the farmer,
who meet tlu^ iirst necessities of the New Zealander. up through the
schoolmaster who follows his fugitive i-hildren into the woods, and the
reader who collects the mon; lettered Hindoos around him in the bazaar,
to the catechist who instils principles into inquiring minds, and the
missionary who preaches the glad tidings of salvation. All are needed :
and all are occupying an important post in that gi-eat work, which it
pleases God to assign to our various Institutions."
And these various projects were not fruitless. Dr. Mears
* Dr. Mears, who was for a time a C.M.S. missionary, was eugaged to
prepare a portion of this History ; but ill-health put a stop to his work. The
passage above is extracted from his MS.
increasing.
122 FORIFARD StEPS
Part III. thus happily summarizes the encouragements of the Society's
Cha^lo " ss'^^^^se^^^th year " (really eighteenth), ending April, 1817 : —
" The seventeenth j-ear saw in Africa the first grand result of direct
Evangelization by its own European ageiits ; in India and in New
Zealand, its first successes from a combination of Medical Work with
preaching; in the former country, t\\e first employment for Educational
purposes of native teachers trained by the Society ; in the latter Islands,
the first material result of Technical Education ; in Europe, the first
practical efi'ects from the Society's endeavours to awaken missionary
interest in the Continental Frotestant Churches ; in the Mediterranean,
the first advantages accruing from the appointment of a Literary liepre-
semtative; in America, the first fruits of the suggestion of co-operation
made by the Committee to the Episcopal Church of the United States ;
while it witnessed, for the Syrian, the Hindu, the Malay, and the African,
the first versions of the Holy Sci'iptures committed to them in modern
times at the hands of the first Missionary Translators of the Society."
cajid^dates Oft'ers of service, too, were now becoming numerous ; and the
Committee were beginning to find the necessity of exercising that
caution in receiving them which has often exposed the Society to
the censures of unthinking people, but which has again and again
been so abundantly justified. In 1816, the Committee in their
Report said, "Not a few offers have been of such a nature, that
they cannot but earnestly advise all who think of proposing
themselves for this arduous work, well to count the cost, and
to view impartially their own situation and character ; and the
Committee are the more urgent on this head, as their reasonable
expectations and hopes have not been without disappointment,
from caprice, self-wiU, or worldly-mindedness, after considerable
expense had been incurred." And in the following year, in which
no less than fifty offers had to be reported, they mentioned that
" the general want of employment," owing to the distressing
condition of the country, had compelled them to " scrutinize with
peculiar care into the motives which led to these numerous offers."
And it is evident that an experience familiar enough in later days
led them to add these significant words : —
" It will be obvious to all considerate persons that the Secretaries and
Committee of the Society have more ample means of appreciating the
(jualifications of candidates than can be enjoyed by others. The friends
of any person who ofi'ers himself as a Candidate for this work naturally
incline to think well of his spirit and qualifications : they feel a measure
of personal or local interest in his success : nor have they had the
opportunity of being convinced by experience that something more than
genuine piety and a desire of engaging in this service is absolutely
requisite to the character of a Missionary."
Cautions Onty ^ ^w months later, Pratt wrote the following admirable
forcandi- ^'emarks on missionary character. The extract is long, but no
cates. ... "^
reader will wish it shortened :* —
" Not a few of the present race of Missionaries emulate the virtues of
the best of their predecessors, and are the happiness and honour of the
* Missionary Register, January, 1817.
FoRiVARD Steps 123
bodies to which they belong; and many more are devoting with all Part III.
simplicity, the talents entrusted to them, to the honour of their Lord : 1812-24.
but there are some of less weight of character. Chap. 10.
" We do not speak of those shades and gradations of character which
are inevitable in such a body of men ; nor of that variety of talents which
the Great Householder commits, for wise purposes, to His servants : but
we speak of those imperfections which have, in different degrees, disap-
pointed the reasonable expectations of the Societies by whom such persons
have been prepared and sent forth, at a great charge on Public Charity.
"It may be beneficial to trace the operations of a mind of this de-
scription in offering itself to the Missionary Service. An honest zeal
springs up in a man newly awakened to feel his own obligations to
Redeeming Mercy, to connuunicate the knowledge of Salvation to others.
Missionaiy Sermons, or Meetings, or Publications, awaken his attention
to the awful state of the Heathen World — he otters himself to this service
— he persuades himself that he is sincere ; and he really is sincere ; —
prudent counsellors advise him to much prayer, self-examination, and a
diligent study of the Missionary work and its ditticulties, with his own
fitness for the lal)our ; and they give him faithful intimations of their
own judgment respecting him — these may happen to be somewhat
humV)ling, and he receives a little check in his view of himself ; but he
goes to liis [)re})aratory work under the strong bias of new-kindled zeal,
with little real self-suspicion, and with little actual discernment of
motives ; and his conclusions are, of course, favourable to his wishes : —
he perseveres, and prevails ; and, at length, sets forth on his high errand,
not to teach, alas ! so much as to learn ! — to learn that he has deceived
himself and misled others ; that he is not sufficiently dead to the world ;
that he is unreasonably careful about his conveniences and comforts ;
that he cannot deny his whole self ; that he cannot, in lowliness of mind,
esteem others better than himself ; that he cannot keep his eye ott' his
own things, to look with kind consideration and strict impartiality on
the things of others ; that he cannot lie at the feet of his Master, and at
the feet of his Bretliren for his Master's sake: — he learns somewhat of Painful
these painful lessons before he reaches the Heathen shores: and when he lessons to
enters on his work, still he has much to learn, before he can effectually
teach:— he counted little, in theory and at home, of jnivations, and
ditticidties, and opposition, and enmity, and strange maniu-rs, and new
modes of thinking, and prejudices, and duluess, and disappointments :
he read of all these, and thought lightly of them ; but he has now to
learn that he is come to this arduous work inadecjuately prepared ; that,
as he knew but little of himself, so he knows but little of those among
whom he is to live ; that he wants that good sense, that intelligence,
that self-command, that unwearied patience, that condescending kindness,
and that knowledge of the heart, which are absolutely re(|uisite to the
full discharge of his high calling. And well will it be for liini if he
discern this; and if, feeling his own deficiencies, he go humbly to his
Heavenly Father, and diligently learn, that he may be enabled well to
occupy such talents as may have been entrusted to him in teaching
others. The wisest and best of our Missionaries must learn in this way :
but they know this ; and their good sense, and their diligent study of
their own hearts and of mankind, have prepared them to learn with
rapidity, when on Heathen ground, the best methods of conunending
their message to the men among whom they are to live : — while others will
give way to discontent, and peevishness, and selfishness; and will grow
listless, and, ultimately, luiless Divine mercy arrest their progress, utterly
iHiprofitable in the great work which they have uiuiertaken.
124
Forward Steps
Part III,
1812-24.
Chap. 10.
Needed
qualifica-
tions.
Let prayer
be multi-
plied.
Women
not
wanted.
" We liave no pleasure in drawing such a sketch t){ human infirmities ;
and rejoice to beheve, that but a few, in any considerable degree,
answer to this picture : but we sincerely hope that this statement of
facts, which, in various measures, have too often occurred, may act as
a caution to those who are purposing to offer themselves to this service.
" We know the difficulties under which the different Societies labour,
in their judgment of candidates. Where there are apparent integrity
and piety and zeal, there is yet sometimes an al)sence of decided
MISSIONARY talent; and, where there is talent, and even sincerity, there
is too often a want of the missionary soul: there is, not seldom, a
moderate p(jrtion of various missionary virtues, which together iovm a
character that you cannot disapprove, and are reluctant to reject ; but
there is an absence of those decided and positive missionary gifts and
GRACES, which would lead you to send such an one forth with confidence
an(l joy.
" A¥e would iH)t be supposed to luidervalue men of a heavenly character,
though not of a superior mind. No! such men, by their humilitv, their
faith, their love, and their prayers — by their readiness of service, and
unwearied kindness of spirit — are the stay and comfort of their Brethren :
they conciliate and win the Native mind ; and they call down the blessing
of their Lord on the undertaking in which they are engaged.
" But, perhaps, Christians have failed here in the duty of Prayer. The
devoted Missionary is the greatest character in the Church of Christ :
all the mere dignities of outward station sink before the grandeur of his
mind and purpose. But the greatest of all human Missionaries was
specially prepared and trained for his arduous service ; and the more we
study the history of those men who have most fully imbibed his spirit
and imitated his labours, the more clearly shall we discern the provi-
dential and gracious infiuence which guided them, from their earliest
years. The true Missionary must be a man peculiarly called and pre-
pared of Him, who divideth to every man severally as He will.
" Let us then, Christians, in all our prayers for the success of Missions,
never fail to beseech the Lord of the Harvest, that He would send forth
labourers into His harvest — that He would graciously prepare, from their
youthful years, by the leadings of His Providence and the influences of
His Holy Spirit, able and devoted servants for the advancement of His
Kingdom in the world.
" Oh, how does the heart cling to the name and deeds of such men of
God ! We need not point out these Christian heroes. Every Society
actively engaged in promoting the knowledge of Christ in the world is
blessed with such men. May every retin-ning year multiply their number
manifold ! "
One result of the increasing number of Englisli candidates was
that the Committee in 1817 resolved upon receiving no more from
the Berlin Seminary. No doubt, however, there were other
reasons for this step ; for in the following year two Germans were
received from the newly-o]3ened Institution at Basle. These were
J. A. Jetter and W. J. Deerr, both of whom proved valuable
missionaries and fulfilled long periods of service.
It was in 1815 that the Society received its first offers of servics
from women. Three ladies at Clifton, Misses Hensman, Weales,
and W. Wilton, of3^ered to go anywhere in any capacity. Daniel
Corrie, wiio was home from India at the time, expressed a strong
opinion that they might be of great value for work among the
Hindu women, for whom nothing had then been done ; but the
Forward Steps 125
Committee, after discussion at two meetinj^s, resolved not to send Part III.
unmarried women abroad, except sisters accompanying or joining p^^"^"^"!'
their brothers. No other decision could be looked for at that period, ^^'
and it is rather a token of the Committee's readiness for "new
departures" that they did not say No at once without debate.
Four years more passed before the first two " female mission-
aries" were sent out, " schoolmistresses " for Sierra Leone ; but one
of them went with her brother, W. A. B. Johnson. She afterwards
married. The other, Mary Bouffler, died soon after landing.
How the money was raised to meet all the enlarged and ex-
panding work foreshadowed in this chapter will appear in the
next one. Here we need only note two special funds started at
this time, which were "forward steps" indeed, but of the kind
that have to be retraced.
One of these Special Funds was to purchase and fit out a special
missionary ship. Both Marsden and Buchanan had urged such Funds,
a plan on the Society ; the former, however, only asking for a
small vessel for local use in the South Seas, while Buchanan,
with his usual large conceptions, aimed at a ship that would
convey missionaries and stores to all parts of the world, facilitate
visitation of the Missions, and secure speedier and more regular
communication. Our ocean greyhounds, as the great mail-
steamers have been so happily termed, were of course then in
the future.''' The scheme was at first warmly received, but
never came to maturity. It was arranged to name the ship the
William Wilherforce ; but although a good deal of money was
contributed, the fund did not prove large enough for the purpose,
and was at length applied to cover the expenses of the Active,
Marsden' s brig in the South Seas. The other Special Fund was
for the maintenance of African children. At first, gifts of £5
were invited, for the "redemption" of the children of slaves; Redemp-
but this " redemption " looked so much like purchase — which ^^°g^°^
word was actually used now and then by inadvertence, — that
strong anti- slavery friends protested, and the plan was abandoned,
"to avoid," said the Committee, "the appearance of evil." In
lieu of it, regular subscriptions of £5 a year were invited, towards
the expense of feeding and clothing boys and girls rescued from
slave-ships and handed over to the care of the Sierra Leone
missionaries by the Government. A great many such contributions
w^ere given, including some by Quakers who could not support the
Society in a general way. The suggestion was made at the same
time that the children might be named after the donors, which
much added to the interest of the plan. The first case of the
kind was a gift from a Welsh friend named Llewellyn, who
requested that four boys supported by his money should be called
David, Morgan, Owen, and Evan Llewellyn; and four girls,
* It is a curious fact that even forty years later, when Pratt's Memoir was
published iu 1849, his biographer mentions, as a reason why the Society at
that (late needed no ships of its own, that letters had come from Xew Zealand
in ninety days. They now come in thirty-five.
126
Forward Steps
The " Mis-
sionary
Register."
Part III. Anne, Martha, Lucy, and Sarah Llewellyn. Very soon almost
1812-24. all the familiar Evangelical names in England were reproduced
Chap. 10. -j^ Africa ; and we find Richard Cecil, Martyn Buchanan, John
Newton, Gloucester Ryder, John Venn, Edward Bickersteth,
Richard Gurney, Hannah More, Mary Clapham, and so forth.
Thus began a system which was very attractive at first sight,
and seemed reasonable at Sierra Leone, where children of various
tribes, without parents and without names, were taken up —
though even there it proved awkward in after years, when a
grown-up " Edward Bickersteth " or " Hannah More " happened
to turn out badly and was convicted of crime ; but which, when
subsequently adopted in India, produced very untoward effects,
denationalizing the children and condemning them to be identi-
fied all through life as children of charity.
It only remains here to notice the fresh efforts made at this
time to diffuse missionary information by means of periodicals.
Up to 1812, the Society had nothing for its friends to read except
the Annual Sermon and Report ; the latter of course very meagre,
but having the journals of the early West African missionaries
appended. But in 1813, Josiah Pratt commenced the publication
of a monthly paper called the Missionary Begister, which he carried
on for five-and-twenty years with quite extraordinary industry
and vigour. It began with thirty-two small pages (fscap. 8vo),
but very soon became thicker, and after three years was enlarged
to demy 8vo. In type and paper it has to a modern eye a very
old-fashioned and uninviting look ; but its contents are most
valuable, collected with what must have been astonishing patience,
and arranged with great skill. From first to last, it was not
confined to C.M.S. information, but definitely aimed at giving a
systematic account of all Missions of all Societies. Taking up at
random the eighth volume, for 1820, we find that it contains
540 pages, and that of these only 140 are devoted to the Church
Missionary Society. For completeness there has never been
anything at all like it. From 1813 to 1855 one could obtain from
it almost all the materials for a general History of Missions.
From the time it was given up until now there has been no such
work, and the historian would be compelled to search all the
Reports of the various organizations. In the first ten of these
forty-three volumes, for example, one can read of the triumph of
Christianity in Tahiti (so curiously like the modern story of
Uganda), the destruction of idolatry in the Sandwich Islands,
the commencement of the Madagascar Mission, the now forgotten
but most interesting enterprise of the L.M.S. in Siberia, the
Scottish Mission ob the Caspian Sea, the earliest work of Robert
Moffat and of that strange man Joseph Wolff, the beginnings of
S.P.G. in India and South Africa," the wonderful translational
* It is interesting to find that the first C-hnroh work in South Africa whs
an S.P.G. school fit Wynberg— a place near Cape Town which is now
couspicuoas for its ipissionai-y zoal in support of C.M.S.
Its com-
pleteness.
Forward Steps 127
work of the Serampore Baptists, the first inception of the Basle Part III.
Missions, the formation of the great American Societies, and, in ^^^^^^
particular, the first efforts of the A.B.C.F.M. in Bombay and _£_ •
Tm-key, the foundation of the Freed Slave Colony of Liberia, the
patient ' labours of the Moravians in many lands, the Methodist
work in the West Indies, the progress of Morrison's Chinese
Bible, Judson's start in Burmah, and several Missions in such
oft-forgotten fields as the Malay Archipelago and Central America.
The work of the Bible Society and the Jews' Society on the
Continent of Europe is described at length, with information
from their branches in Germany, Eussia, &c. The S.P.G. colonial
operations in Canada are included ; and so are the proceedings
of home Societies like the S.P.C.K. and Keligious Tract Society
(on their home side), the Naval and Military Bible Society, the
Prayer-book and Homily Society, and even the National, British,
and Sunday-school Societies, together with, of course, philan-
thropic organizations like the African Institution and the Anti-
Slavery Society.
A few further particulars of the early contents will be in-
teresting. The funny little first volume, in its brown leather us con-
covering, opens with " kn Appeal, particularly to Churchmen, *^"*^-
on the i)uty of Propagating the Gospel " ; and the rest of the
thirty-two pages of No. 1 are occupied with a brief account of
the Church Missionary Society. Nos. 2 and 3 are entirely taken
up with a contribution from Hugh Pearson (afterwards Dean of
SaHsbm-y) entitled "Historic View of the Progress of the Gospel
since its first Promulgation" — a reproduction, in abbreviated
form, of his Essay which gained the Buchanan Prize at Oxford.*
No. I is devoted to India, the Charter Bill of 1813 being then before
Parliament; and concludes with an obituary notice of Henry
Martyn, whose death had just been announced. No. 5 contains
a brief sketch of all the chief Missionary and Bible Societies in
the world ; a narrative of the shipwreck of an African missionary
party ; and notices of the May Meetings. _ Here it should be
mentioned that the Begister, like other periodicals at that time,
was published at the end of the month it belonged to, so that
the May number in each year gives the account of the May
Anniversaries. The next few numbers give a serial sketch of
the life of Schwartz, some of the speeches at the inauguration
of the Bristol C.M.S. Association, and much information about
other Societies. The systematic and complete review of the
various Mission-fields and societies does not begin till the fourth
year, when the magazine became an octavo one. This fom'th
volume opens with a Ust of all the (Protestant) missionaries in
the world at that time (1816), two hundred and sixty in number ;
and the fifth volume opens with an alphabetical Hst of all mission
stations, with a few notes to most of their names and the names
of the missionaries working at them. Summaries of this kind,
* See p. 97.
128
Forward Steps
Chap. 10.
Its pic
tures.
Part III. varying in form, are given in most of the January numbers.
1812-24. Biographical sketches of deceased missionaries and Native con-
verts are numerous, and give the minutest details of the last
days and hours of some of them. Descriptions of idolatry, and
of heathen customs like suttee, &c., are inserted, often taken from
the very first authorities of that day, such as Sir W. Jones and Dr.
Ward. In the volume for 1820 we find printed, for the first time,
the familiar prayer used to this day at C.M.S. General Meetings.
Illustrations occur frequently, from 1816 onwards, very rough
woodcuts which would not pass muster now, but which excited
keen interest eighty years ago. Before,, however, these begin,
two illustrations are found, of another kind. One is a striking
diagram or chronological chart showing the progress and relative
position of Christianity, Mohammedanism, and Paganism, in the
eighteen Christian centuries ; and the other is a map of the world
with all the Missions of all Societies marked.
This Missionary Begister was unquestionably a great power
in its early years. Though not an official publication of the
Church Missionary Society, it was naturally identified very closely
with it by Pratt being the editor ; and the Society pmxhased
some thousands of copies every month for free distribution among
subscribers and collectors. It was ultimately superseded by the
various periodicals started at different times by the Societies
themselves in their individual interest ; but the forty-three
volumes will always remain a monument of sanctified industry
and a storehouse of valuable information concerning the progress
of the Kingdom of God.
The First Picture in a] Missionary Magazine, the Missionary Register of
April, 1816.; representing a scene in West Africa.
Thi'x Map will stryc to shevt the relalire
iituaiinn of ihe prinapai stationj of
r^orrttntit Missions in the Eastern Hernia
jphere. It comprehends a portion of the
Eujth.wlujjt, ronrain.f four fifths, prrliaps ,
of oJl its Inhnbilants. The Mnp is corrected.
up to the enJ of ihe Tear iSiG. />«/ the
Stativnj are siihfect to frrr/iient change.
The Mirsiouart/ Stations are denoted, by
a line under the nnme.! of the- places.
In the /tn.'sian Empire, Sarepta is a
SettUinent of tJie United Bretliren, and
Oretibury, Asfrachnn , and Kf>rass,ore Stations
of the Edinbui-g Missionary Society.
At Malta, the Cliurcli Missionarif SocieO/ has
a JfepresenUUiye , and the London Missionarif
Societt/ has sent one to Ike Greek Islandj.
In IVeslern Africa, Ike Church Missionary
Society has Station.r at Coree, Canoffce ,
Gamhier, and Yoitgroo: tyith three in the
Colony of Sierra Leom. which could not be
marked on thi, Uap, these are at Leicester
Afountoin.ot Regents To»n ,ond at Kissty
town.Ath'rettown,in the Colony, the
IVesleyan Methodists hove a Mission, and
at Cape Coast, the Society for fYopogatwig
the Gospel have an Aged Hatiee Missionary.
In South Africa, the Stations are. for
want of room on the Map, chiefly denoted
bif numbers which refer to the accom-
panying List ■■ Of these Stations Cnadenthal
and Graenekloof art Settlements of the
United Brethren, and, at Cape Toun the
ffesleyan Methodists have o Missionary. Oil
.the rest belong to the London Missionary Society
" for 1816.
>UT TlIK 1L4STSR
Map and « ^anyiof Notes inserted tr. t.>e Iiti^&'.onar^ Register for 1816.
MIKHIff* ACY >1.C:eXHIBITl.<. THEVARIorS S TAXI OJTSpP, PROTESTANT MISS tOXS THROi t^HOTT THK K-VSl^KK^HEMISPHERK
Art ^ • Jnf>»4 a^ Ml Z^.**' Vw«
CHAPTER XI.
liousiNii Tilt: Cousriiv : The First Associatioss and
Deputations.
Growing Needs — Plans for Associations —The Start at Bristol — Basil
Woodd's Yorkshire Journey — Features of the Campaign: Obstacles,
Opposition within and without the Church. Successes, Spiritual
Influence, Hymns Norwich, Cambridge, Liverpool, Ireland —
Grandfathers of the Present Generation.
" The Spirit of the Lord cime upon Gideon, and he blen' o (ni)npet . . . And
he sent messengers throu.jhoiit all Mnnnsseh . . . and he sent messenijers unto
Asher, and unto Zebuhin, and unto Naphtali." — Judges vi. 34, 35.
have now to look at one particular movement of the Part III.
year 1813 which, as already indicated, was one of the p^^^'^i^,
pi-ineipal "forward steps" of the period, and the ^'
cause of many others. This movement was the
sending out of Deputations to preach and speak in
l)ehalf of the Society, and the establishment of Local Associations.
Apparently it was the need of money that led to the initiation of
the movement ; but money was not the chief burden of the
sermons and speeches.
In 1812, having thirteen men already in the field and ten under
training, — with heavy responsibilities in Africa, and (as we shall
see) New Zealand and India and Ceylon beginning to demand
attention, — the Committee, conscious that an income of £2500 to
.£3000 a year would not meet the growing expenditure, were much
occupied in devising plans for widening the area of interest in the Plans to
country and thus increasing the Society's resources. Pratt at "'*^^""'**-
length niatin-('d a scheme, atlapted from one already started by a
younger but more flourishing institution, the Bible Society, for
establishing Church Missionaiy Associations in town and country
in aid of the Society ; nay, as the original scheme phrased it,
" throughout the Empire." The main idea was to obtain, not
only collections in churches, which needed no regular local
Associations to secure them, but more especially penuij-a-treck
■subscription.s from young and old. rich and poor; which were to
be raised by each member undertaking to collect at least twelve
such subscriptions, say Is. a week or £2 12s. a year.
The first of these new Associations was formed within a few
weeks, for London itself ; but this soon became practically only a
VOL. I. K
130 Rousing the Country:
Part III. committee of leaders of the various parochial and congregational
1812-24. associations which gradually came into existence, and which
Chap. 11. geverally retained their independence. Of provincial Associations,
First Asso- Mr. Hole's researches show that the first, organized in February,
ciations. 1813, was at Dcwsbury, a town which had already given the
Society two of its earliest English missionary candidates, Green-
wood and Bailey. The Vicar, Mr. Buckworth, was one of the
warmest friends of the missionary cause. Collections on Mr.
Pratt's plan w^ere begun about the same time at Carlisle, Beading,
and four or livo smaller places, without the formation of a regular
Association. The honour of being the first parish of all to organize
one has been claimed for Hatherleigh in Devonshire ; but this
was for the C.M.S. and the Jews' Society (then an undenomina-
tional bod}^) jointly. In like manner, at St. Chad's, Shrewsbur3%
an Association was formed to collect jointly for the C.M.S.,
the Bible Society, and the Prayer-book and Homily Society.
Dewsbury in England and Glasbury in Wales certainly stand
.first with regularly-organized Associations forCM-S. only.* But
Bristol. Bristol had been planning operations on a large scale before,
apparently, any of the others ; and probably the only reason why
its date is not actually the earliest is because so large a scheme as
it was proposing needed time to mature. When it did start, on
March 25th, it at once took the lead, and kept it for many years
— if indeed it does not still keep it, seeing that the three or four
Associations that now raise a larger sum cover a much larger area.
The chief founders and leaders of the Bristol Association are
worth naming. They were the Rev. T. T. Biddulph, already
mentioned as the preacher of the fourth Annual Sermon ; the Rev.
James Vaughan, father of a well-known clergyman of later years,
James Vaughan of Brighton ; the Rev. John Hensman, whose
name, by-and-by, came' to be given to children in a Tamil boarding-
school, and eventually to be borne by a Native clergyman in
Ceylon and a leading Native Christian layman at Madras ; the
Rev. Fountain Elwin, long a prominent Evangelical clergyman ;
and Mr. J. S. Harford, of Blaise Castle, an intimate friend of
Wilberforce,! and uncle of Canon Harford-Battersby, the founder
of the Keswick Convention. These men arranged for the in-
auguration of the Bristol CM. Association by proceedings lasting
over five days, comprising sermons in seven churches, witli
collections (which included £60 w'orth of ladies' jewellery), and a
great public meeting in the Guildhall, at which eleven resolutions
were moved and seconded by twenty-two speakers, besides whom
* In the Jubilee Statement of the Committee, in 1848, several places are
mentioned as havincf had Associations at an earlier date, Olney in 1802,
Aston Sandford in 1804, &c. ; but these were not regular Associations, and
this word never occurs in the Reports until 1813.
t Mr. Harford was quite a younp- man at this time. Fifty years after, he
published a most interesting^ book, Recotlcctions of William Wilberforae
(London, 1864), which contains many striking anecdotes of the great
philanthropist.
The First Associations and Deputations 131
there were the Mayor in the chair, and Mr. Pratt, who had come Part III.
from liondon on purpose. I low lonj; tlie meeting histed we aro |Wl2-24.
not told ; hut in those days live and six hours were not thought P" ^^'
too long on an important occasion. Some of the speeches are
still extant, '•■ and they are not short. Mr. Pratt's must have
occupied an hour ; and Mr. Harford's, which is described in a Harford's
contemporary notice as " very elegant," and which is really "P*"*'-
eloquent and able, probably three-quarters of an hour. One
passage is so striking that it must be quoted here. Mr. Harford
is ri'plying to the objection, " What right have we to disturb the
ancient faiths of the East ? " He says : —
"To this f|U('8tinn I would simply reply. "What right had St. Paul
[whom he supposes to have brought the Gospel to Britain ; hut the
argiuiietit would apply eipially to any one else to visit this rouiitry when
the thiek rilni of Pagan darkness involved the uiinds of its inhabitant,'^.!'
What right had he to Ijrave the terrors of our stormy seas, and to
eneounter the still more savage manners of our ancestors!- What right
had ho to oppose himself to their ]iorri«l customs, to throw down by his
doctrine their "altars stained with the blood of human sacrifices, and to
regenerate the code of their morals di.sgraced by the permission of every
crime which can brutalise and degrade human nature r What right had
he to 8ubstitutt> for the furious imprecations of the Druids tlu' .still small
voice of Him who was meek and lowly in heait !- What i i<;ht had he to
exchange their horrid pictun-s of the invisible world f..r the glorious
prospects of the heavenly Mount Zion, the iiuuuiierable company of
angels, and the spirits of just men made pi-rfect r' What right lia<l he to
l)lant by such a procedure the .seminal jirinciple of all our subse<|U«'nt
glory and pmspi-rity as a nation, our boasted liberty, our admiraltle
code of law, the wliole inimitable frame and constitution of our govern-
nn'ut in Church and State !-
'• This <|uarrfl with the memory of St. Paid T shall leave to the oppo-
mnts of .Slissioiiary Institutions to .settle; and when they have made up
tlieir minds as to the di-gree of infamy wlii»'h is to cleave to him, for
having lu-en (in a remote sense at least) tin- first conveyancer to us of
the best blessings which we now enjoy, I will then consign «»ver tho
Mi.ssioiuuies of the present day to their severest reprehension I"
This speech is remarkable also for a glowing eulogy of Henry
Marty n. the news ofwho.se death had just been received. The
addresses generally consist of arguments justifying the existence
and objects of the Society. There are appeals neither for men
nor for money. It was no doubt supposed that when the claims
of tho Heathen world came to be realized, both would be forth-
coming. If this expectation was entertained, it was not fulfilled
as regards men. No missionary on the Society's roll appears to
have hailed from Bristol for many years afterwards.! But as
regards money, this great meeting initiated the movement which
quadrupled the Society's income within the year. Its immediate
• In vol.j. of tbe Misiiunar\j Rojxster.
+ But it is true that in some cases tho particolar towii whence a man
came is not named. And there may have been candidate!* who were not
accepted.
K 2
132 FousiiYG THE Country:
Part III. result was the mapping out of the whole city for systematic weekly
1812-24. r^^-^(J monthly collections ; and in its first year the Bristol Associa-
Chap. 11. ^j^^ raised £2300, a sum equal to the whole average annual
receipts of the Society before that time.
An important feature in these inaugural proceedings was the
presence of Mr. Pratt. His visit to Bristol was the first instance
First "de- of what is now known as a "deputation." But that word was
putations. ^^^ used then in this connexion. It often occurs in the early
records, but it means a deputation to wait upon a bishop or a
minister of state. In this year, 1813, began the practice of sending
leading clergymen to different counties and towns to preach
sermons and address meetings ; but they were looked upon as a
sort of variety of the " itinerants " of Wesley's day, and were a
good deal suspected in conseqvience. The first demand for such
a visitor came from Leeds ; an eminent surgeon there, Mr. W.
Hey, F.E.S., a friend of Wilberforce, suggesting that a tour might
be made through the West Eiding. Pratt applied to Basil Woodd,
and Woodd' s reply shows what such a proposal looked like at
first sight: " I do not see the expediency of sending ministers
from London to Yorkshire ... it has an aspect of publicity which
I do not like. I am willing to succour the cause in my own little
sphere, but do not ask me to take long journeys." Nevertheless
he gave way, yielding, it may be supposed, to Pratt's reasoning
or importunity ; and within three weeks, on July 21st, he was on
B.woodd's his way to Yorkshire with his wife, taking the tour in lieu of a
^°"'"' holiday, travelhng in a postchaise, and undertaking, if required, to
preach twice a day. " This is a glorious object," he wrote, " and
it is an honour to collect if but one stone or brick for the spiritual
temple. I trust I have your prayers in this very important and
unexpected engagement, for this day three weeks I as much
expected to be in the moon ! "
Leeds, Bradford, Huddersfield, Wakefield, Pudsey, Tadcaster,
Knaresborough, York, Scarborough, Bridlington, Malton, Ponte-
fract, Barnsley, and many smaller places, were visited on this
journey ; and, on the return journey southwards, Kettering,
Peterborough, and some Midland villages. The tour took two
months and a half. The travelling, in pre-railway days, and hotel
expenses, came to £150 ; but Mr. Woodd collected £1060. He
preached fifty sermons, and started twenty-eight associations, in-
volving, it may be presumed, a good many public meetings, besides
private conferences, &c. ; and he distributed over 7000 papers.
In Bradford parish church he preached three times on Sunday, the
collections amounting to £73 ; and he " could not resist " address-
ing the children also. " Who knows," he said, " but it may bring
some child to the blessed Saviour ? ' ' Missionary Exhibitions
were yet seventy years off"; but, "I brought two Hindoo gods
with me ; one has a snout like an elephant. I find they entertain
everybody, and plead the cause of Missions as well as if they were
missionaries themselves." He returned full of joy and thank-
TiiF. First Associations and Deputations 133
fulness. " Our excursion," he wrote, " has been attended with Part ITT.
a succession of mercies, kindnesses, and endearing interviews, p,^.^"~^i'"
which I trust will prove a foretaste of our eternal meeting." '' ^'
. . . "I have experienced great encouragement for fresh exertion .
May the Church Missionary Society flourish till the Son of Man
Cometh in His glory ! Amen." His hosts appear to have been as
pleased as he was. One clergyman wrote about " the truly great
and good Eev. Basil Woodd, who, wdth his dear and interesting
meillc.ure moitie, W'herever they go kick the beam of hospitality
by their own intrinsic excellence."
This memorable journc^y was quickly followed by others, under-
taken by such men as Goode, Burn, Henry Budd, Logh Richmond,
Melville Home, Haldane Stewart, William Marsh, Daniel Wilson,
and, a little later, R. W. Sibthorp and J. W. Cunningham. There
was also an M.P., Mr. T. R. Kemp, who took a tour in the north,
carrying the clerical deputation with him in his carriage.''' Mr. Hole
has traced out the tours from the middle of 1813 to the end of 1814
with infinite pains and accuracy, devoting to them nearly half of
his large volume. The I'ecords are full of interest. They give
signilicant glimpses of the Chiu'ch life of the period ; they narrate
the small beginnings of associations which have done noble work
in later years, and are doing it still ; and they introduce us to the
fathers and grandfathers of our own contemporaries in all parts of
the country. In the present work we can but gather up some of
the general features of these early deputation tours, with a few
illustrative incidents.
1. The inconveniences of travelling in those days, and tlie Risk-sin
weary length of the journeys, must be borne in mind. In the "^ ^^ '"^'
first tour, already described, Basil Woodd wrote, " Our carriage
has cracked two axle-boxes and two springs; roads very rough."
After a Cornish trip he wrote, " Last Saturday at Plymouth was
the first regular dinner I had for eight days." On one occasion
Daniel Wilson travelled from 6 a.m. to 5 p.m. in a coach dragged
by " four wretched horses," with seven other passengers inside
and ten out, accomplishing forty miles in the time ; after which
he had twenty-six miles further to go in a postchaise, at the
rate of five miles an hour, arriving at his destination at 10 p.m.
" There was a suffocating dust the whole way." One journey
cost the Society and the Church dear. Mr. Goode went to
Ipswich on a frosty night ; the floor of the coach was out of
repair, and let in chilling draughts ; and the illness that resulted
ended a most valuable life.
2. Much more serious than these external discomforts were
the opposition and objections mot with. Here and there, letters
in the local newspapers — anonymous, of course — reproduced the
cavils of East India traders and the sarcasms of Sydney Smith ;
* It was this sir. Kemp ou whose estate at Bi-ightou Kemp Town was
built.
134 BoirSING THE COUNTRV :
Part TII. and criticisms of this kind, of which we think liglitly now, had a
1812-24. quite factitious importance then. Still greater was the difficulty
P" ■ caused by the lack of episcopal patronage. Eleven bishops were
on the list of patrons of the Bible Society — and, it may be added
here, six royal princes, the Dukes of York, Kent, Cambridge,
Cumberland, Sussex, and Gloucester (Kent and Sussex spoke at
the Anniversaries in these very years) ; but not one had given his
name to the Church Missionary Society. Some of the bishops
opposition Were even open opponents. " We have got a new bishop," writes
of bishops, one friend, "who is determinedly hostile to every society, and
declares o^jenly that he looks on them as dangerous to the State
and the Establishment." Bishop Law, of Chester, whose diocese
extended from Birmingham to Westmoreland, charged his clergy
not to receive " those itinerant preachers who, neglecting their
own parishes, went about through the country to draw all the
money they could for the support of societies self-constituted,
and unauthorized by either Church or State." Evening services,
too, and week-day services, were sometimes objected to, not only
by bishops, but by other respectable people who dreaded inno-
vations. The Bishop of Exeter forbad evening services when
Basil Woodd visited Devonshire ; and even John Scott of Hull,
son of Thomas Scott, and for many years afterwards one of the
warmest of C.M.S. men, was afraid to hold a special service on a
week-day. " It would ])e very distasteful to church folk," he
said, " and give the whole affair an irregular and unchurchlike
appearance." We are not surprised, after all this, to find many
excellent clergymen holding aloof. One at Liverpool returned
the papers sent to him, saying, " A society having for its object
the increase of pure i-eligion seems to me essentially defective
if it has not the patronage and support of those to whom I owe
deference as exercising the apostolic office and functions in our
Church." To which Pratt replied, "Your principle would have
stifled the Eeformation in its birth. It implies that nothing can
become a duty in the subordinate members of the Church in
which their superiors do not countenance them. We have but
one point to aim at in this respect — to deserve that countenance,
and we have no doubt it will, in due time, be obtained."
Objection was also frequently made that the new Society was
interfering with the old ones — generally, of course, by those who
did nothing for the old ones ! The most conspicuous, and indeed
amusing, instance occurred in 1817 at Bath, when an Archdeacon
interrupted a meeting by a public protest, Init this will be noticed
in the next chapter. Pratt's ordinary reply to such objections
will easily be divined. In a word it was this, that neither
S.P.C.K. nor S.P.G. was sending any Church of England mis-
sionaries to either Africa or Asia. But he replied in another
way in at least one case. A Norwich clergyman offered him his
pulpit, provided the collection might go to the S.P.C.K. instead
of the C.M.S. Pratt at once consented, saving, "We seek not
The First Associations asd Deputations 135
ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord. His Ivin^'dora, His glory, Part III.
His spirit, is what we seek to advance in ;ill things." 1812-24.
3. A good deal of difficulty was encountered from an opposite '^P' '
quarter. The London Missionary Society, quite naturally, as a Rivalry of
non-denominational body, sought the support of Churchmen as ^-m.s.
well as of Nonconformists, and was at this time particularly
vigorous in pushing its claims all over the country. It had no
high ecclesiastical authorities to appease, and it had already
aroused widespread enthusiasm among the Dissenters. Much
more jealousy was aroused in this way than on account of S.P.CJ.
or S.P.C.K., neither of which would have dreamed of employing
" itinerant preachers " in those days. Again and again we find
local friends who desired the new Church Society to be supported
writing urgent letters to Pratt for deputations, " or the London
Missionary Society would occupy the field first." Bristol itself
was roused in the first instance by the L.M.S. ol)taining sermons
and collections in no less a church than St. Mary Redcliffe. On
the other hand, the Dissenters in many places were very generous
to the Church Society. Repeatedly, when Ijegh Richmond or
Ilaldane Stewart or Daniel Wilson was to pivach in the parish
chui"ch, the Independent, Paptist, and INfethodist ministers closed
their cliapels, and took their people to hear the visitor. At Stoke-
upon-Trent, " the Methodists enlivened the service by their loud
Amens." At Kettering, Andrew Fuller, the friend of Carey, and
secretary of the Baptist Missionary Society, held one of the plates
at the doors.
4. One effect of these difficulties on both sides was that the Church
advocates of the new Society' took especial pains to insist on its of cms.
Church basis and character. Thus, at the inaugural meeting at gl^^j "'
Piistol, the principal resolution approved the new Society because
it was understood to be " decidedly attached to the doctrines
and episcopal government of the United Church of England and
Ireland"; and on the same occasion Mr. Biddulph, the Evan-
gelical leader at Bristol, said, " It is in the character of Church-
men that we appear this day; happy in an opportunity of testifying
our attachment to our Zion, and of proving that attachment-by
zeal for her lionour " ; and he goes on to quote from the Prayer-
book, to show that " our past omissions are not chargeable on oiu'
Venerable Parent." This phrase, and " our Venerable Mother
tlie Estaljlished Church," are not infrequent. A Suttblk gentle-
man, in giving in his adhesion to th(! Society, wrote, " Satisfied
as I am of the superior excellence of oui" venerable Clnuch
Establishment, from its strict adherence to the great truths
of the Gospel in its Liturgy, Articles, and Homilies, I cannot
but wish for the success of a plan to extend its influence "; and
similar expressions abound in sermons, speeches, aiul letters,
Especially do we find tliem in Irish utterances. " However
great," says one, " the l)lessings of religion under any really
Christian form, she appears with a peculiar grace when she is
136 J^ousiNG THE Country:
Part III. made known through that pure and evangehcal medium [the
]«l2-2-t. Church] which unites a dignity to command the respect of the
Chap^ll. j^^Qsi; imperious." Again, an Irish judge rejoices to have " no
douht that the Heathen will flock in larger bodies into the Church
of England than into any other religious community." John
Cunningham of Harrow, for many years a leader among English
Evangelicals, wrote a pamphlet in 1814 on Church of England
Missions, in which he appeals to "those who believe in the
superiority of our Church to every other religious society," who
" discover in its formularies the exact impress, the sacred image,
the embodied spirit of the Gospel," who " attribute the moral and
intellectual advancement of the country in great measure to the
character of the religion diffused by the Establishment," who
believe that the "stream of pure and undefiled piety" having
" suffered so little pollution in this country since the Apostolic
ages" is due to "the mercy of God in confining it to this par-
ticular channel." And, again and again, Churchmen are called
to greater activity in the cause in order that even recognized
Churches, like tlie Presbyterian Church of Scotland and the
Lutheran Church of Germany, may not outrun the Church of
England in promoting it. " Shall the eldest daughter of the
Eeformation," exclaims one, " suffer her younger sisters to out-
strip her in the cause of missionary benevolence ? Shall not the
Church of England, the Queen of Churches, awake from her
lethargy, stand up in her comely proportions, clothe herself wuth
the doctrines of her Articles as with the garments of salvation,
and send forth her sons, breathing the spirit of her Liturgy, to
carry the banners of the Cross to the ends of the earth? "
"The Much of this has a strangely unfamiliar sound in our ears.
Estabhsh- Egpg(,ially, the constant reference to "the Establishment." Is
this word, much as we still value the connexion of Church and
State, ever used at a missionary meeting now ? or even at a
Church Defence meeting ? This is not the place to discuss the
causes of the change of feeUng ; but the fact is certainly signifi-
cant. Still more curious is a sentence in a circular issued at
Norwich by Edward Bickersteth, then a solicitor in that city : —
" As this is peculiarly a Church Society, and as the objects of the
Society have received the sanction of Parliament, it is hoped that
all the friends of the Establishment will patronize and support
it." It is true that the reference here is to the passing of the
East India Company Charter Act, which was one "object" of
the Society. Still, tlie sentence startles the modern reader.
iTvono-pii- 5. While the advocates of the Society were thus emphasizing in
caifsm no. evcry possible way its Church character, it does not seem to have
liTid!^" occ^^"^'®^ ^° them to emphasize its Evangelical distinctiveness. We
r V in vain in their utterances for the strong assertions of the
truth \ Evangelical doctrines and the rights of Evangelical men
I • 1 f '^1 quite the staple of C.M.S. speeches in the middle of
.1 , At iu'st sight one proposes to account lor tins bv the
TiiK First Associations axp Deputations 137
fact that tlie Tiactarian movement had not then t^'iven an impetus Yk\^-x\\\.
to High Church teaching and methods. But the opposition to ^^- -|
Evangehcahsm was— as has heen aheady shown in these pages—
actually stronger and more bitter in those days than afterwards.
Bishop Tomline of Lincoln was at least as vehement in his
denunciations of what he was pleased to call Calvinism as " Henry
of Exeter" in later days; and " Calvinism" really meant Evan-
gelicalism, for the Wesleyans, who were strong anti-Calvinists,
were equally condemned. The real fact is that the theological
" colour " of an organization emanating from the " serious clergy "
went without saying. It was its Church character that needed
explanation and vindication.
G. But whatever might l)e the opposition to the Society, or to Success^^
the missionaiy cause generally, the preaching deputations drew t.ons.
crowds to their services. At Norwich, people clung to the windows
outside to catch a few words of Pratt's sermon ; and Daniel
Wilson wrote at the same time, " The whole city seemed to have
come together. You might have walked on the people's heads.
I stand ama/.ed at what God hath wrought." At Sheffield Parish
Church, the congregation assembled to hear Legh Richmond
numbered 3500, and hundreds failed to get in ; and at Bradford,
when he preached three times on the Sunday, the congregations
were estimated at 2000, 3000, and 4000 respectively. " I never
saw anything like it," he wrote; "such a day, such a church,
such a vicar, such life, such attention, such liberality." Tlie
vicar thus referred to was Mr. Crosse, whose bequest founded the
Crosse Hebrew Scholarship at Cambridge. Curious incidents are
recorded : for instance, at Welshpool, an officer at the theatre
on Saturday night called out to the company that they must
all come to church next day and hear the gentleman from
]-:ngland. Collections were often very large, and the poor gave
f reel v.
7.* It is evident that most of the work was done by sermons. Meetings
., ,,. . ,j\ 1 a douDitul
The day of large public meetmgs was not yet. As we have seen, novelty,
they came slowly, even in London. There is a curious incident
mentioned in an article signed "H.," written forty years later,
which appears in the Chrhtian Observer of June, 1857. Mr.
Jiichardson of York has been before mentioned as one of the
first country mtiinbers of the Society, and a hearty friend ; but the
meeting here mentioned could not have been before 1817, as
Biekerstetli was one of the deputation : —
"It is now alino.st forgotU'ii with what (li.strnst even the best men
viewed theso Puhlic A.s.seinblics for religion.s i)vui)o.st'.s. We can reiiR-iuher
iioar half a century since, tlio visit of a 'deputation" from one of these
Institutions, to York, where Mr. Richardson —the lit Prebendary of such
a Catliedral, lofty and majestic in his person and manner— then presided
over the con.siderable body of earnestly religions men in that city. His
consent was obtained, though with some <hHi<-ulty. to the holding of such
a meeting And the writer of this paper nuit-mbers, when the present
138 Rousing the Country:
Part III. Bishop of Calcutta, Mr. Bickersteth, and himself presented themselves to
1812-24. the Meeting, the solemn manner in which the then aged and venerable
Chap. 11. Minister rose from his chair, and, leaning on his gold-headed staft",
announced to the assembly his doubts about such Meetings; but added,
that, as certain well-known advocates of religious objects had presented
themselves in the hope of being allowed to hold such an assembly, he
had consented to it, and he now called on them to proceed, and if they
had any new facts or arguments in store, to produce them ; on which the
trembling youths (comparatively) arose, and, as well as they were able,
told their story, showed the destitute condition of nine-tenths of the
human race, and pointed to the means by which it was ho})ed to meet
their necessities, and pour the light of the Gospel into these daik regions.
And after they had finished, what was their joy to hear Mr. Richardson
close the Meeting by announcing that he was convinced, and tliat hence-
forth he should rejoice to welcome such deputations as the Society were
pleased to send."
Zealous g. In othei' ways, too, the old Scotch proverb, " Many a little
collectors. •/ ' ' v > j
makes a mickle," was illustrated. Penny Associations were being
started in many places not visited by deputations ; collectors, men
and women, undertaking to collect a penny a week from at least
twelve persons, i.e. a shilling a week, or £2 12s. a year. Mr. Hole
has unearthed the case of a Warwickshire lady who hoped to find
a subscriber or two at Coventry, " though I'eligion was not much
alive in that town." She left a jDaper with a townsman, asking
him to give a penny a week. He read the paper, was stirred
up by it, and started collecting himself among his " serious
acquaintances," and in a short time he had formed what he called
four "societies" of twelve persons each giving a penny a week,
and three " societies " of twelve each giving a shilling a month.
Several ladies in different tow^ns obtained hundreds of small
subscribers. And not ladies only. A Welsh clergyman, on
receiving a paper from headquarters, mounted his horse, rode
forty miles, applied to rich and poor, and came back with
£23 Is. GfZ. An Essex vicar's wafe sent up collections from " the
Tradesmen's Club at the Hun inn, 30s.," " the Tradesmen's Club
at the Swan, 20s.," and " the Labourers' Club at the Stvan, 20s."
9. But the movement did not aim only at the collection of
funds, nor were its results pecuniary only. The numerous original
letters examined by Mr. Hole mention again and again the spirit
of prayer awakened. " Prayer for the conversion of the Heathen
was everywhere remembered among religious people, in individual
devotions, in social meetings, in family worship, in secluded
villages, in humble cottages, and among children." Even this
was not the only spiritual result, scarcely perhaps the chief
Spiritual Spiritual result, of the movement. Preachers like Basil Woodd
effects of Q^Yy^ Legh Eiclimond and Daniel Wilson preached no mere charity
tnc move- j. •/
ment. sermous. In setting forth the darkness and the needs of the
Heathen world, they also set forth the one remedy, the message
of a full and finished salvation from the guilt and the power of
sin by the atoning death of Christ and the regenerating and
The First Associations and Deputations 139
sanctifying grace of the Holy Ghost ; and in doing this, they were Part III.
preaching the Gospel which is the power of God unto salvation 1812-24.
to thousands who needed it for themselves, and to not a few who ^^^P- ^^
rarely if ever heard it. Mr. Kemp, M.P., whose volunteer tour
with a clerical deputation has been mentioned above, wrote his
impressions of the campaign, and said that not only would the
Society itself benefit, but it would also " become the instrument
of preaching the Gospel in many pulpits whence the joyful sound
was not often heard." In this sense the utterances of the depu-
tations were strongly and powerfully Evangelical ; they \vere
spiritually Evangehcal, though not polemically Evangelical.
Moreover, the Gospel they preached was a practical Gospel,
because, mstead of merely comforting "professors" (as pious
people were called) with glowing accounts of their privileges and
safety as the fiock of Chi-ist, they summoned the said " professors "
to rise up and bestir themselves for the salvation of others. Their
teaching, therefore, roused both the careless and unbelieving from
the sleep of sin, and also the drowsy Christian from the sleep of
self-satisfaction. In both respects, the journeys of the C.M.S.
deputations proved a real blessing to the country and to the
Church.
10. It is interesting to observe that the spiritual influence of the Use of
missionary services was distinctly fostered by the use of hynnis, '^*''^"^-
then — as before stated — a suspected novelty in the Church ; so
seriously suspected, indeed, that Charles Simeon, at this very
time, advised a friend, whose bishop was angry with him for
introducing them, to " put them aside " as " quite unnecessary." ■•'■
" The hymns," wrote Basil Woodd from Yorkshire, " have greatly
increased the missionary feeling." But he preferred metrical
versions of the Psalms, and this is not surprising when one reads
the doggerel of some of the hymns of the pei'iod. The reason,
however, for his preference was more probably that Psalms
were ecclesiastically less open to objection ; and it is noticeable
that the first "hymn-paper" issued by the Society itself at
that very time contained four Psalms, viz. the GTth, " To bless
Thy chosen race" (Tate and Brady); the 72nd, "Jesus shall
reign where'er the sun" (Watts); the 96th, " Sing to the Lord,
ye distant lands" (Watts) ; and the 117th, " From all that dwell
below the skies" (Watts). Yet there were a few good original
hymns too, current at the time, such as " O'er the gloomy
hills of darkness," "Arm of the Lord, awake, awake," and "AH
hail the power of Jesus' name." It is a significant thing that,
although several of these Psalms and hymns wei'e written early in
the dull eighteenth century, they failed to come into general use
until the present century. The missionary awakening caused a
demand for such compositions, and long-neglected prayers and
praises in verse were unearthed, gradually became familiar, and
* Moule's Charles Simeon, p. 182.
140 Rousing ti/f. Country:
Part III. now are sung all over the world. Here a very curious fact may
1812-24. )3e mentioned. The earlj^ traditions of the Church Missionary
^P" ■ Society as a carefully strict Church institution w^ere perpetuated
to our own day in the matter of hymns for its official Anniversary
Sermon. The paper printed for the occasion was always headed
"Psalms to be Sung," and the same three were sung year after
year without change, viz., "With songs of gi'ateful praise" (a
version of Ps. xcvi.), sung to "Darwell's " ; "Jesus shall reign,"
sung to "Truro"; and "From all that dwell," to the Old
Hundredth : these last two being the very two that Basil Woodd
asked for in lieu of "hymns." It will scarcely be believed that
the first " hymns " at the famous St. Bride's Service were sung in
1882, on the occasion of Bishop Pakenham Walsh's sermon.
Our account of the rise of the Association and Deputation
sj'stem must not close without a brief notice of three or four of
the Associations. The great one at Bristol has been mentioned.
Norwich The next in importance was at Norwich, the formation of which
tion°'^*^" was due to Edward Bickersteth, then a solicitor in that city.
If Bristol had the honour of leading the way in the new
missionary movement, Norwich was distinguished for being the
first to secure the patronage of a bishop. The then Bishop of
Norwich, Dr. Bathurst, was a very liberal-minded man, and in
his first episcopal charge went so far as to avow himself convinced
that the " zeal and piety " of the Evangelicals, " when under due
regulation, were productive of very great good." ■•'• He was
already a friend of the Bible Society ; and he at once acceded to
Bickersteth's request that he would be Patron, not of the Church
Missionary Society itself, but of the proposed Norwich Association.
But very few of the leading clergy and people in Norfolk followed
his example. " This city," wrote Bickersteth, " is in a very
different state to Bristol. All are alive to worldly things, while
religion meets with either opposition or a most cold and heartless
reception." " Many seem to start with horror at the idea of
Missions as including everything enthusiastical and fanatical."
But he had already declared to his fellow-citizens that " an Asso-
ciation there sliould be, if he stood alone on the Castle Hill and
proclaimed it " ; and now he expresses his full belief that if they
"continued praying and believing and working," it might be
" respectable." And the " praying and believing and working " did
bring down a blessing. Although " the rich and noble, the clergy
in general, and the Dissenters and party men " all stood aloof, the
success of the inaugural services and meetings (Sept., 1813) was
astonishing. It was on this occasion that the crowds mentioned
before thronged to hear Pratt and Daniel Wilson ; and the week
produced £900. A Ladies' Association was started, the first in
England ; and it is a striking parallel to this that the first of the
modern Ladies' Unions was also started in Norfolk, in 1883. At
* Overton, English Church in the Nineteentli Centunj, p. 113.
The First Associations and Deputations 141
the first x\nniversary, in 1814, the Bishop actually presided at Part III.
St. Andrew's Hall, and delivered the first episcopal speech ever 1812-24.
given for the Church Missionary Society. It was short, hut very Chap. 11.
much to the point. " Do some respectahle men start at the very
name of 'Missionary'? What does 'Apostle' mean?" "Arc
we to beware of enthusiasm ? I, gentlemen, am no friend to a
zeal that is without discretion. But those who affect to he so
much alarmed about it may prevent the effects they apprehend by
joining our ranks and moderating the zeal from which they fear
such bad consequences." " But they tell us that there are already
two venerable societies in the Established Church. Be it so — I
wish there were two hundred ! " And the good bishop concluded
by encouraging the Society to persevere " till the glad tidings be
preached in every corner of the world, ' as far as winds can waft
and waters roll.' " Heber had not yet written " From Greenland's
icy mountains " : whence, then, came these last words?
x\mong the earliest Associations one expects to find Cambridge, First steps
considering Simeon's intimate connexion with the first establish- trid^^"
ment of the Society, Martyn's career and death, and the interest
excited by Buchanan's prize essays. And there were influential
Evangelicals in the University besides Simeon, such as Isaac Milner,
Dean of Carlisle and President of Queens', who had been a Senior
Wrangler ; William Farish, Tutor of Magdalen and Jacksonian
Professor of Chemistry, also a Senior Wrangler, and immensely
respected for his ability and goodness ; James Scholefield, Fellow
of Trinity, and afterwards Eegius Professor of Greek ; Joseph
Jowett, Fellow and Tutor of Trinity Hall and Eegius Professor of
Civil Law ; his nephew, William Jowett, Fellow of St. John's,
and afterwards a missionary ; and William Dealtry, Fellow of
Trinity, who succeeded John Venn at Clapham. Nevertheless,
there must have been some peculiar difficulties ; for no regular
Association was formed until 1818, and even then Simeon, to use
his own words, " trembled at the proposal, and recommended the
most cautious proceedings." Meanwhile, as before stated, one of
the earliest churches in England to have a collection for the
Society was Trinity, Cambridge, as far back as 1801 ; and early in
1813 we find both town and gown being canvassed, the former by
ladies and the latter by undergraduates. The well-known names
of Charles Bridges and Francis Cunningham, both of Queens'
College, occur among those of the undergraduates who were
active ; and among the junior contributors were Henry Venn the
Second (afterwards C.M.S. Secretary), H. V. Elliott and E. B.
Elliott, two brothers Carus-Wilson, John Babington, and others
who in after years did good service in the cause of Christ. Through
the efforts of F. Cunningham, Daniel Wilson was induced to
visit Cambridge in the May term of 1811, and preach in Simeon's
church. During the three weeks before he came, the zealous
juniors set to work, and collected no less than £270 in the various
colleges, one-half the contributors being of Queens' College, then
142 Jio USING THE Country:
Part III. the favourite resort of Evangelical students. Sixty years after-
1812-24. wards, Canon John Bahington tlius recorded his recollections
Chap^ll. of it: —
" A rare sermon it was ; I was never more deeply interested in my
life. The text was, ' He shall see of the travail of his soul and be satis-
fied.' The question was, What must that be which shall satisfy the
yearnings of the blessed Redeemer's soul i" I have seen a priuted sermon
of his upon that text, but the influence at the time of his fervour, and
the depth that he seemed to open before us, was far beyond anything that
the printed sermon can suggest."
When the regular Association ^vas formed, at a public meeting in
1818, two Fellows became Secretaries, Mandell of Queens" and
Scholefielcl of Trinity ; and among the Vice-Presidents we find no
less a person than Lord Palmerston, then one of the members
for the University. But the connexion of Cambridge with the
Chiu'ch Missionary Society has in later years been of a very
different character, as we shall see hereafter. The primary
purpose of an Association — and a most useful purpose — is to
raise funds. Cambridge has raised missionaries. "■=
Man- The most unpromising of the large towns were Manchester
Chester. ^^^^ Liverpool. Manchester began with a Sunday-school Asso-
ciation in St. James's parish, and no more was done for two
years. " We are opposed," wrote a friend there, " by all the
weight of property and powder, both ecclesiastical and secular. . . .
The soil of Manchester is very unfavourable to the cultivation
and growth of any religious institution whatsoever : even those
already planted are in a weak and languishing state, choked with
Liverpool, thorns, the cares, the riches, the pleasures of life." Liverpool
seems to have been still w^orse. The only Evangelical clergyman
there, Mr. Blacow, had a proprietary chapel, and no status among
his brethren. "What with ultra-Calvinists on one side, Methodists
on the other, and the whole posse of the clergy and their power-
ful lay patrons on a third, I am perpetually assailed." He adds
that he fears that all he can raise will be £200 or £300 a year from
his own congregation ! How many Liverpool churches raise that
sum now ? Mr. Blacow thought that this w^ould be a proof that
" the bush w^as not burnt." He enlarges on " the zeal and energy
of the Dissenters and the apathy of the Establishment." "The
whole mass of the people is verging fast into dissent, and we shall
soon have an episcopal Establishment with a dissenting popula-
tion." But there w^as something much worse than Dissent.
Liverpool had been deeply involved in the slave-trade ; and Blacow
observes that " an age must elapse before the garment spotted by
the flesh — with the polluted stains of African gore which clings to
so many leading men — is worn away." " While a shred of that
remains," he adds, " whoever appears among us in the holy garb
* In an article on " The Early Days of the C.M.S. at Cambridge," in the
CM. Intelligencer of September, IS87, Mr. Hole gives full and interesting
pai'ticulars ; and these are supplemented in his book.
I
The First Associations and Deputation^ 143
of the Eedeemer's righteousness, will be treated as a mover of Part III.
sedition, a man not fit to live upon the earth." Eeading all this, 1812-24.
one begins to appreciate the mighty work done for religion", and ^^' '
for the Church of England, in after years, by Hugh Stowell at
Manchester and Hugh McNeile at Liverpool.
One of the most interesting of the home enterprises undertaken
at that time was the establishment of the Hibernian Auxiliary. Ireland.
The same difficulties, from the opposition of the bishops on the
one side and the rival claims of the London Missionary Society on
the other, w-hich we have noticed in England, were encountered
also in Ireland; but at length Pratt, D. Wilson, and W. Jowett,
went over, in June, 1814, — leaving London, it is worth noting, at
7 a.m. on Monday, and reaching Dublin early on Friday morn-
ing ; and being received with the greatest kindness by many
leading people, they successfully started the Auxiliary. It is
curious to observe that one of their most enthusiastic friends was
Mr. Thomas Parnell, great-uncle of the Irish political leader.
Many names interesting in very different ways from this one p^j^ grand-
occur in the records of the early Associations and Deputations.
We find Reginald Heber (afterwards Bishop of Calcutta) seeking,
but in vain, to influence the clergy of Shrewsbury in the Society's
favour. We see E. T. Vaughan, father of Dean C. J. Vaughan,
warmly welcoming Pratt to Leicester ; Sir John Kennaway,
grandfather of the present President, taking the lead in the Devon
Association ; Thomas Fowell Buxton, afterwards Baronet, and
grandfather of the present Sir T. F. Buxton ; Mr. Hardy, Recorder
of Leeds, father of Gathorne Hardy, M.P., first Viscount Cran-
brook ; John Sargent, friend and biographer of Henry Marty n,
and father-in-law of Bishop Samuel Wilberforce ; Peter French
of Eeading, grandfather of Bishop Frencli of Lahore ; T. Carr,
of Wellington, Somerset, afterwards Bishop of Bombay, in his
old age a leading member of the C.M.S. Committee ; C. J. Hoare
(of the Fleet Street, not the Lombard Street, branch of the
family), afterwards Archdeacon of Surrey and Vicar of Godstone.;
Philip Gell, the first collector of Sunday-school contributions for
the Society, father of Bishop Gell of Madras ; Isaac Spooner,
of Elmdon, father-in-law of William Wilberforce, and grandfather
of the wife of x\rchbishop Tait ; Mr. John Higgins, father
of C. L. Higgins, one of Dean Burgon's "Twelve Good Men,"
and President of the Bedfordshire C.M. Association ; and John
W^est, an Essex curate who was afterwards the first C.M.S.
missionary in North-West America, and baptized the first Chris-
tian Indian boy (afterwards the first Red Indian clergyman)
by the name of his old rector, Henry Budd. Many other not
less interesting names have come before us in this chapter.
Sometimes a pessimistic Evangelical speaker enlarges mournfully
on the words, "Your fathers, where are they?" May we not
well reply, " Instead of thy fathers shall be thy children, w^hom
thou mayest make princes in all the earth " '?
CHAPTER XII.
CJI.S. AND Other Societies.
The S.P.C.K. and S.P.G. at this Period— The Archdeacon of Bath's
Attack on C.M.S. — Awakening in S.P.G. : the Royal Letter — Pratt's
"Propaganda" — Heber proposes union of S.P.G. and C.M.S. — The
Bible Society, Jews' Society, Prayer Book and Homily Society,
Religious Tract Society, Nonconformist Missionary Societies —
Foundation of the American Church Missions.
'^ Look not every man on his own things, bnt every man also on the things of
others." — Phil. ii. 4.
Part III.
1812-24.
Chap. 12.
Relations
to other
Societies.
HE references in C.M.S. publications in early days, and
especially in the Missionary Bcgister, to the labours
and progress of other Societies, are so frequent and so
full, that it seems desirable at this stage to give a short
notice of these Societies, and of the relations of the
Church Missionary Society to them ; more especially as some of
them owed much to the sympathy and energy of C.M.S. leaders.
The spirit that actuated men like Josiah Pratt and his comrades
is strikingly shown in his words, quoted in the preceding chapter,
when a Norwich rector insisted on giving the collection after
Pratt's sermon, not to the new Society, but to the S.P.C.K. : " We
seek not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord. His kingdom, His
glory, His spirit, is what we seek to advance in all things."
The reasons that compelled the founders of the Society to esta-
blish it at all, notwithstanding the previous existence of the S.P.C.K.
and S.P.G. on one side and of the non-denominational London
Missionary Society on the other, have already been stated. '■= When
once their own organization was launched, however, while they
frequently urged its difference in basis and in principle from the
L.M.S. as a reason why Churchmen should join it, a careful search
fails to find any instance of their urging any difference of basis
and principle between it and the S.P.C.K. and S.P.G. as a reason
why any particular class of Churchmen should support it rather
than them. They constantly pleaded that Church people generally
should support it as ivell as the others ; but on what ground ? On
the ground that the Heathen must be evangelized, and that the
two old Societies were only doing it on a very small scale. In
* Sec Chapter VI., pp. 64, 65.
S.P.C.K.
C.M.S. AND Other Societies 14;
1817, the S.P.C.K. Lutheran missionaries in South India were Part III.
reduced to two ; and out of a free income of £24,000, it spent 1812-24.
upon them and their mission about £1000, the Society's main ^^_^12-
work being that of pubhcations and grants to schools at home. At
the same period the S.P.G. had about forty clergymen and forty
schoolmasters in the North American Colonies, and scarcely any
others ; " and of these, only three were in part labouring among
the Indians. But its great and sudden expansion was now
approaching, and was described year by year by Pratt in the
Begister with unfeigned joy and unreserved sympathy.
The spirit in which both these elder sisters were regarded might Cordial
be illustrated by many expressions in the Eeports, Sermons, and of s%"g^"
speeches of the time. For instance, in the Eeport of 1814, the ^"d"
Committee speak of " the invaluable labours of the two Societies," ^"^'
while they add that as Missions to the Heathen are only one of
the objects aimed at in either case, an institution was still needed
which should aim solely at that object. " Most gladly will the
Committee witness such an augmentation of the funds of those
two Societies as will enable them to enlarge their care of the
Heathen. There is more than room for all exertions. This
Society comes forward, not to censure the partial efforts of past
times, but to aid and augment these efforts." And in the same
year, Dean Eyder, in the Annual Sermon, says of the two elder
institutions, " God be thanked for their past exertions ! God be
with them in the future ! We would hail them as elder brethren,
as forerunners, as examples. We are not contending in a race
where ' all run, but one receiveth the prize.' There are many
crowns, and only too few candidates."
In 1814, the S.P.C.K. published in one large volume an Abstract
of its Eeports and Correspondence on the Lutheran Missions in
South India from 1709 to date. Pratt instantly hailed this work
with satisfaction, and strongly recommended it in the Register;
and, at the end of his review of it, added a noteworthy separate
paragraph, in which he " respectfully submitted to the venerable
Society for Propagating the Gospel the expediency of imitating
the example'' of the sister Society. "The public," he urged,
" have very little opportunity of becoming acquainted with its
proceedings, the Annual Sermon and Eeport not being published
for sale, but hmited in their circulation to the members" (then
about 300 in number); " nor," he adds, " is justice done to those
patient and successful exertions by which it long reproached the
supineness of others." Meanwhile he regularly published in the
Register large extracts from the S.P.G. Eeport, although the
work was almost wholly then among the settlers, and scarcely a
reference to the Heathen is to be found. In 1817 is reprinted in
* To be strictly accurate, the Society paid £50 a year towards the stipend
of a chaplain for the Africa Company on the Gold Coast, and £40 a year for
three schoolmasters and one schoolmistress for the convicts in Kew South
Wales and Norfolk Island.
VOL. I. T.
146
C.M.S. AND Other Societies
Part III
1812-24.
Chap. 12.
Avoiding
S.P.G.
fields.
S.P.C.K.
moving.
its pages nearly the whole of the Annual Sermon preached at
Bow Church by the Bishop of London (Dr. Howley), " not only,"
writes the editor (Pratt), "on account of its intrinsic excellence,
but because we wish our readers to partake with us in the pleasure
which we derive from witnessing the pledges tints given, in the
highest quarters, of hearty co-operation in the diffusion of Chris-
tianity throughout the world. The anxiety which the higher
Pastors of the Church are beginning to feel for the recovery and
edification of her distant members awakens in our minds a lively
hope that the course which has been at last entered on will l^e
consistently pursued." The Annual Meeting is also noticed, as
usual ; though in those days there was little to notice, for it was
held in the vestry immediately after the Sermon, merely to adopt
the Keport and pass a vote of thanks to the Bishop.
Moreover, the Committee were careful not to intrude into what
might be S.P.G. fields of labour. In 1819, Bishop Kydcr of
Gloucester brought before them the need for the Church of
England undertaking missionary enterprise in South Africa, where
at that time only the London Missionary Society, the Wesleyans,
and the Moravians were engaged. The Committee, however,
seem to have had some information that the S.P.G. was con-
templating work there, and therefore directed inquiries to be made
on this point in the first instance. On ascertaining that the
S.P.G., having been applied to by the Governor of Cape Colony,
was about to send " a clerical missionary to instruct the Natives,"
it was resolved to take no further steps.
In 1813, the S.P.C.K., stirred up evidently by the rapid progress
and important position attained already by the Bible Society,
began to organize district committees all over the country, which
very quickly doubled and trebled its income. -■= One of the first
of these was formed by Basil Woodd, immediately after that
memorable tour in Yorkshire for C.M.S. which was described in
the preceding chapter, in connexion with his own congregation
at Bentinck Chapel ; and it raised £122 for the S.P.C.K. the first
year. The S.P.G. subsequently started similar District Com-
mittees ; but this was preceded by a series of events which marked
the emergence of the Society from its long torpor into the activity
that has characterized its proceedings from that day to this.
These events must be briefly noticed.
On November 30th, 1817, in which year St. Andrew's Day and
Advent Sunday coincided, a Church Missionary Association was
inaugurated at Bath by a sermon preached at the Octagon Chapel
* With a \'iew to assisting this movement, Pratt inserted in the Retjister
the " form of recommendation for membership," as follows : — "We the Under-
written do recommend A. B. to be a Subscribing Member of the Society for
Promoting Christian Knowledge, and do verily believe that he is well affected
to His Majesty King George and his Government, and to the United Church
of England and Ireland as by Law established ; of a sober and i-eligious life
and conversation ; and of an humble, peaceable, and charitable disposition,"
C.M.S AND Other Societies 147
(afterwards Dr. Magee's) by Bishop Eyder of Gloucester ; and the Part III.
next day the same Bishop presided over a meeting convened to 1812-24.
form the Association. As soon as he had delivered his opening Chap. 12.
speech, and just as Mr. Pratt was about to make his statement on
behalf of the Society, the Archdeacon of Bath, Mr. Thomas, rose The Arch-
unexpectedly and protested, in the name of the Bishop of Bath B^a^th"" °^
and Wells, against the invasion of the Diocese by an unauthorized p"m s"
society, which amounted, he said, to a factious interference with
S.P.G. ; and also against Bishop Eyder for intruding into a
diocese not his own. In point of fact, Bishop Eyder was no
intruder, for he was also Dean of Wells — a not uncommon case in
those days, — and therefore had a status in the diocese. Moreover,
the Bishop of Bath and Wells had been communicated with by
him, had consented to his presiding, and had not commissioned
the irate Archdeacon to make the protest. Also it turned out that
the Archdeacon was not even a subscribing member of S.P.G. ,
which Pratt was ! But the incident, though a small thing in
itself, led to great consequences. The Church Missionary Society striking
IDrolited by it, both in money sent in at once in token of con- '■^s"'*^-
fidence (£400, against the loss of four guinea subscriptions) ; -
and from the war of pamphlets which ensued, which gave the
Society a pubhcity it had not before attained to. The Arch-
deacon's attack appeared in the Times, and a " Defence " written
by Daniel Wilson not only went rapidly through eighteen editions,
but was printed in many newspapers. The S.P.G. profited still
more. The Archdeacon's eulogy of its great work was so far
beyond the truth at the time, that some of the bishops woke up s.p.g.
and resolved to put more life into it, and make it worthy of such ^p^.*"'"^
praise, and in particular, not to leave Church Missions in North
India (the South being cared for by the S.P.C.K.) to the young
C.M.S. _ The C.M.S. leaders made no secret of their thankful
satisfaction at this move. Pratt thus announced it in the Bcqistcr
of April, 1818 : —
" Our readers will rejoice to learn that the Society [S.P.G.] is enlarging
its operations, and is about to avail itself of that influence which it may
extensively exert over tlie members of the EstabHshed Church, to call
their resources into action in support of Missions to India. Several
Special Meetings have been sununoned, within the last few weeks, to
deliberate on these subjects, and were attended by the Archbishops of
Canterbury and York, the Bishops of London, Salisbury, Norwich,
Gloucester, Ely, Peterborough, Exeter, Oxford, and Llandaff, ... We
shall take an early opportunity of reporting the proceedings."
And the next Annual Eeport said, " Your Committee most
heartily bid. the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel God-
speed, and entreat every member of this Society [C.M.S.] to aid
that venerable body to the utmost by his contributions and by his
prayers. They augur incalculable good from these exertions, not
* Just as in tbo case of Canon Isaac T:wlor's attack in 1888, wliich
brouo^ht C.M.S. gifts amountini>- in the aggregate to £100\
L 2
letter for
S.P.G
148 C.M.S. AND Other Societies
Part III. only to the Heathen and Mohammedan subjects of the Empire,
1812-24. but to those who attempt to become blessings to them." At the
Chap. 12. gg^^-^g ^-jj^g^ ^YiQ Committee reminded their friends that even if the
S.P.G. undertook the duty of evangehzing the whole of the
Heathen within the Empire, there would still remain five or six
hundred millions of souls outside the Empire, and therefore
(at that time) outside its range, — a hint that C.M.S. had still a
raison d'etre. "Oh!" exclaims the Eeport, "it needs nothing
but an understanding of the immensity of human wretchedness
and perdition to extinguish all jealousy and rivalry among Chris-
tians—^/lai rivalry alone excepted, which shall labour most
assiduously to save souls from death and to hide the multitude
of sins ! "
The new measures adopted by S.P.G. were two. First, a sum
of £5000 was voted to the Bishop of Calcutta, who, though an old
S.P.G. supporter, had now been in India nearly four years without
receiving any help from the Society. Secondly, the Prince Eegent
Royal (afterwards "George IV.) was applied to for a " King's Letter " to
be sent to all parishes in England and Wales directing that a
collection be made for the Society. Similar Letters had been
granted to the Society six times in the preceding century, and the
fact that one had not been apphed for since 1779, almost forty
years previously, was a sign of the inert condition from which the
Society was now awaking. In announcing these decisions in the
Begister, Pratt said, —
" Let us thankfully acknowledge herein the good hand of Him Who
governeth all things after the counsel of His own will. We trust that
we shall have to record the collection of a munificent sum on this
occasion, and that it will be our frequent duty to report the great in-
crease and successful labours of Church Missionaries among the Heathen."
That this was not merely the utterance of official courtesy is
shown by the following extract from a private letter written at the
time by Pratt to Thomason at Calcutta : —
" Wonderful things have taken place. . . . The Archdeacon of Bath
has unwittingly served that great cause which lies, we trust, nearest our
hearts. He gave the Society for Propagating the Gospel credit for
doing so much, that some of our rulers in the Church have felt it
needful to do more than it had ever entered into their minds to con-
template. And now, hy virtue of a King's Letter . . . all the clergy will
be enjoined to plead its cause. . . . Had any one told me, when I and
Mr. Bickersteth were travelling to Bath, to attend the famous meeting
of December 1st, that in less than six months such a meastu-e should be
determined on by Authority, no sagacity of ours could have devised by
what means such an event could be accomplished ; but we would adore
the Avisdom and goodness of our God, and pray for the man who has
been the undesigning instrument of so much good."
And to Corrie, also in India, he writes,^
" Is not this wonderful? Could you have conceived any means, when
among us, by which the Clergy, wUling and unwilling, should be con-
strained in all their pulpits to plead the cause of Missions ? — and of
CMS. AND Other Societies 149
Missions in India ? True, numbers will make this a reason for not aiding Part III.
us : but they will be made to aid that cause which is dearer, we trust, to 1812-24.
all our hearts than any consideration respecting ourselves." Chap. 12.
But Pratt was not content with words. He did a very notable
thing. Hardly had the Eoyal Letter been issued, early in 1819,
than a remarkable book appeared, by an anonymous writer, Pratt's
entitled "Propaganda: being an Abstract of the Designs and ^"o°u7book
Proceedings of the Incorporated Society for the Propagation of ^o help
the Gospel in Foreign Parts ; with Extracts from the Annual ^'^'^'
Sermons; by a Member of the Society"; the extracts being
from the sermons of such men as Archbishop Seeker, Bishops
Beveridge, Burnet, Butler, Horsley, Lowth, Newton, Tomline,
Warburton, kc That hook was covijnled by Josiah Pratt. With
infinite labour he had gone through the old S.P.G. Reports and
extracted the best passages, feehng that if the clergy who received
the Letter could only have such sermons and reports to guide
them, their appeals to their congregations would be more intelli-
gent and more effectual. With all possible speed he brought it
out, and published it anonymously, conscious that if his name, or
that of the Church Missionary Society, appeared, it would quite
fail to do the work he hoped it would do. Its success was imme-
diate and decided, and it had great influence in promoting the
collection. The Preface to this book is worth quoting in full :—
" From the Year 1702, to the present Year, a Sermon has been annually
preached before the Society, at the Parish Church of St. Mary-le-Bow':
which Sermon has, in every instance except that preached in 1703, been
printed for the use of the members; and has been accompanied, with
the exception of a few of the earlier years, with an Abstract of the
Society's Proceedings.
" These Records of the Society having never been published for sale,
but printed merely for the use of the Members, the Editor considered
that he should render an acceptable service to his Brethren of the
Clergy, by collecting from these Records, such statements and reasonings
as might enable them to plead with eiiect the cause of the Society, in
obedience to the Royal Mandate issued on the Tenth Day of February
of the present Year.
" These ofBcial documents, together with an Account of the Society to
the Year 1728, published by its Secretary, the Rev. David Humphreys,
D.D., have supplied the materials for the following pages.
" The Clergy will see, from the various Extracts herein given, that the
IJast was contemplated, many years since, by some of the Right-
Reverend Members of the Society, as a most important object of its
attention and care. Bishop Thurlow, in 1786, spoke strongly on this
subject; and was followed by many others. In 1817, it was renewed,
with fresh vigour and zeal, by Bishop Howley ; and by Bishop Ryder, in
the present year. The Editor ventures to predict, that the more closely
the condition of that part of the Empire is examined, the more earnest
will every fa,ithful Member of the Church become, to aid the Propaga-
tion of the Gospel in those parts, by his contributions, his counsels, and
his prayers. The sources of information on this subject are now easy of
access, and are multiplying every day.
" Lo7}don, May 1, 1819."
150 C.M.S. AND Other Societies
Part III. The progress of the movement is reported in the Ecgistei' month
1812-24. ijy i:nonth. The S.P.G.'s own Circular is given in full; which, it
ap^i . jjjyg^ i^g observed in passing, contains no reference to any other
Society, not even the S.P.C.K., and no allusion to any existing
work in India. The Annual S.P.G. Sermon of that year also is
printed in the Becjister almost in full, occupying sixteen columns
of close type ; in the December number is given the total of
royal collections up to that time from the various dioceses,
amounting to £42,222 15s. Q>d. ; and the following announcement
is also made : — " We rejoice to find that a beginning has been
made in the establishment of Local Associations in support of the
Society ; as we may hope, by this means, to see the great body
of the Estal)lished Church brought into a system of habitual
contribution in support of Missions to the Heathen."
A little later, we tind the following in tlie Annual Eeport : —
[This Society] " is a kindred Societ)' to those veuenible institutions of
the Chiu-ch of England — tlie Societies for Promoting Christian Kniiw-
ledge and for tlie Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts, which
liave laboured in the glorit>us work of in'eaching Christ among tlie
Heatlien and in the British Colonies dining more than half a century.
It utterly disclaims all interference, all rivaliy with them. It occupies
no missionary station which they are able to occupy. It exercises
toward them a temper respectful and conciliating. It regards them as
elder sisters, and rejoices to behold them putting forth their strengtli,
increasing tlie number of tlieir friends, extending tlie limits of their
Missions.'"*
Did S.P.G. It may be asked whether there was any reciprocitv of feeling
rccipro- *^ •/ J. »- '-^
cate? on the part of the older Society towards the younger one.
There does not seem to be any evidence of it ; but it must be
remembered that S.P.G. had then no organ of its own, and that
its Aimual Eeports were the briefest business statements. At
the same time, a very kindly feeling could hardly be expected.
Only two bishops had as yet openly joined the Church Missionaiy
Society ; it was still widely regarded as an institution that had no
right to exist ; and it would scarcely be surprising if the kind and
sympathetic utterances of its leaders were looked on as an attempt
at patronizing and as savouring of impertinence. It is not
agreeable to human nature to be patted on the back by those
whom you are wont to despise. But if the younger Society did
not get much direct expression of gratitude from its elder sister,
the cause it was serving received a great impetus ; and this not
only in the way indicated in Pratt's letters, but in another way
which Dr. Overton shrewdly points out. Missions to the Heathen
bore, in the imagination of the majority of Churchmen, the taint
of " Methodism." But the S.P.G. was above suspicion in this
respect; " it was impossible for the keenest scent to detect in it
any traces of that hated thing"; so when such a Society itself
* C.M.S. Report, 1823, p. 51.
C.M.S. AND Other Societies I51
engaged in efforts of the kind, " it stamped them, as it were, with Part III.
the mark of respectabihty." * 1812-24.
But the idea occurred to at least one great and admirable man P"
that the two sisters might be united. This was Eeginald Heber, Heber's
of whom we shall see more in another chapter. He wrote to p'^"^ *°
John Thornton, his intimate college friend, then Treasurer of the s.p.g. and
C.M.S., and to Bishop Eyder, on the subject. From the latter ^■^■^^
letter it appears that though sympathizing with both S.P.G. and
C.M.S., he had definitely joined the latter and not the former.
" Of the two Societies," he says, " I have been induced to_ join
that which is peculiarly sanctioned by your Lordship's name, as
apparently most active, and as employing with more wisdom than
the elder corporation those powerful means of obtaining popular
support which ignorance only can depreciate or condemn It is
but justice to say that I have seen nothing which leads me to
repent of this choice. But why, my Lord, should there be two
societies for the same precise object? " He actually formulated
a scheme of union, or rather, as must candidly be said, of
absorption of C.M.S. into S.P.G. The S.P.G. was to admit all
C.M.S. members to its membership, and enrol on its staff all
C.M.S. missionaries; the C.M.S. Secretaries were to become
Joint Secretaries of S.P.G. ; and C.M.S. was to transfer to S.P.G.
all its property and funds.! What the replies of Bishop Eyder
and Mr. Thornton were is not recorded. In the meanwhile, the
S.P.C.K., which was increasing its income and its home work
by leaps and bounds, was not prospering in its South Indian
Missions. One Lutheran minister was sent out in 1813 — but soon
died, — another in 1818, and two more in 1819 ; Pratt's Register
reporting the valedictory charges on all three occasions. In the
following decade, these Missions, which had greatly languished,
came under the joint direction of the S.P.C.K. and S.P.G. ; and
subsequently the S.P.G. took entire charge of them, since which,
under a succession of able men like Caldwell, they have been
developed and extended in all directions.
It must not be supposed, because the Church Missionary
Society displayed so much brotherly feeling towards the older
Societies, that the Evangelical leaders were backward in defending
Evangelical truth when they thought it necessary. In 1816, for s.p.c.k.
example, a great conflict arose in the S.P.C.K. over a tract by gfe"*™^^'^"
Dr. Mant on Baptismal Eegeneration. Basil Woodd and Daniel
Wilson, whose congregations were among the most liberal
supporters that the S.P.C.K. had in London, contended that its
extreme statements were inconsistent with the Society's regular
line of moderate teaching on the subject; and although they
* Entjlish Church in the Nineteenth Century, cbaji. viii.
■)" Dr. G. Smith, in his fascinating^ recent biogra]ihy of Heber, prints this
proposal with the evident sympathy becoming a Presbyterian. The Pres-
byterians all over the wox-ld have unreservedly woi'ked their Missions, not by
societies, but by " the Church in her corporate capacity."
152
C.M.S. AND Other Societies
Part III,
1812-24.
Chap. 12.
The Bible
Society.
Its consti-
tution.
were beaten at the crucial division, the Archbishop of Canterbury
intervened, and, though approving the tract himself, obtained
some modifications in its language.
Of all the Societies v^'ith which our own Society was brought
more or less into contact at the period now under review, by far
the most successful and prosperous was the British and Foreign
Bible Society. It had been founded on March 7th, 1804, after
some months of patient preparation. All denominations joined
in it ; Wilberforce, Grant, and others whose names are already
familiar to us in this History, became its leading members ; royal
dukes patronized it ; bishops who would do nothing for Evangelical
movements within the Church gave it their names and influence ;
and its establishment was hailed with widespread enthusiasm.
At Oxford, in 1813, it was joined by the Chancellor of the
University, eight Heads of Houses, five Professors, and both
Proctors, besides the Lord-Lieutenant and other chief men of the
county and city ; and at Cambridge the patronage was not less
distinguished. Three Secretaries were originally appointed : one
for the Nonconformists, Mr. Hughes, who was the real founder ;
one for the Foreign Protestants, Dr. Steinkopff; and one to
represent the Church of England — for which post Josiah Pratt
was chosen, but he only held office a few weeks, and was
succeeded by the Eev. John Owen. Pratt was the inventor of the
constitution of the committee. Its members were all to be laymen,
of whom six were to be foreign Protestants, and the remainder
(thirty) equally Churchmen and Dissenters ; but all clergymen
and ministers who became subscribing members might attend
and vote, — "a provision," says the Bible Society's historian,
Mr. Owen, " which, while it concealed their names, recognized
their privileges and retained their co-operation." This proviso is
interesting as having doubtless suggested, a few years later, the
similar plan upon which the governing body of the Church
Missionary Society has been formed for more than eighty years.
But the two Societies have had a higher and a closer association
than that involved in this external resemblance. They have
worked together in unbroken fellowship in the one cause of giving
the Word of God to the Heathen nations. While the C.M.S., and
the other various missionary societies, have supplied the trans-
lators of the Scriptures, the Bible Society has done the essential
work of printing and distributing the versions. The Bible is still,
and no doubt ever will be, the object of attack and criticism on
the part of men whose learning is not sanctified by the wisdom
that Cometh from above ; but meanwhile, in its hundreds of
foreign versions, it is proving its inspiration by enlightening the
eyes and converting the souls of multitudes of the most ignorant
and degraded of the human race.
The proceedmgs of the Bible Society occupy considerable space
in the Register. In its tenth year the Society's Income had
reached £70,000, exclusive of sales of Bibles ; and the Eeport
C.M.S. AND Other Societies 153
printed is an astonishing record of work all over the world. In Part ni.
1817, so great was its progress in Europe that Pope Pius VII. p^^^^t"
issued a Bull against it ; to which the Bishop of Cloyne, at the ^°^P- ^-
Anniversary that year, thus incisively referred : — Pope's Bull
against it.
" This i-espoctable porsona,c;e, his Holiness the Pope, says that many
heresies wnll a])i)ear, but that the most baneful of heresies is tlie reading
and dissemination of the liible. So, then, to propagate that book in
wliich Clu-istianity is founded is to propagate heresy. The misfortune
of this Bull is tliat it comes into the world a thousand years too late.
It might have done some harm in tlie Ninth Century, but will have very
little "eil'ect in the Nineteenth. . . . To quote St. Paul, ' I thank my God
that, after tlie way they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers.' "
The Bihle Society's anniversaries, indeed, were generally very its Anni-
hiilliant affairs. In 1816, the speakers were Lord Teignmoutli ''^■■^^'■"^•
(President, in the chair), the Duke of Kent, the Chancellor of the
Exchequer, the Bishops of Gloucester, Norwich, Salisbury, and
Clogher, Charles Grant, M.P., and Lord Gamhier. Speeches in
its behalf at Liverpool, Margate, Dover, &c., by the Prime Minister
himself, Lord Liverpool, are reported in the Begister. Indeed
this very brilliancy was a cause of complaint on the part of some.
Bishop Eaiulolph of London was " disgusted at the pomp and
parade " of tlie Society, contrasting it with the " simplicity and
modesty" of the S.P.C.K.''^ But of course much more serious
grounds of opposition prevailed, and the Bible Society was again
and again vehemently attacked by the ablest High Church
controversialists of the day, such as Bishop Herbert Marsh,
Archdeacon Daubeney, and Dr. C. Wordsworth, because it circu-
lated the Bible without the Prayer-book, and encouraged the
notion that men might draw their own religion from it without
the guidance of the " authoritatively-commissioned priests " of
the "one only apostolical Church established in this country."!
It will at once be understood how the C.M.S. leaders were con-
cerned in the defence of the Bible Society, as well as in alliance
with it in the ti'anslation and distribution of the Scriptures.
Another organization with which the Society's chief men were
in close touch was the London Society for Promoting Christianity London
among the Jews. It was founded in 1808, on non-denominational society,
lines like the London Missionary Society ; and like the Bible
Society, it had royal support, the Duke of Kent being Patron.
In a few years, however, it ran hopelessly into debt, and then
it appeared that subscriptions were refused on account of its
unsectarian character. Ultimately the Dissenters, in a genei'ous
spirit, withdrew, and subsequently founded a separate society
for themselves ; and from that time the London Society prospered.
Its debt, then £14,000, was paid off in the room at the next
Anniversary. Its meetings, in fact, were for many years perhaps
* Overton, English Church in the Nineteenth Century, chap. viii.
t Archdeacon Daubeney, qnoted by Overton, ut supra.
1-4 C.M.S. AND Other Societies
Part III. the most popular of all ; the meetmgs being always densely
1812-24. crowded, and the greatest interest being taken in the Hebrew
Chap^l2. school-children \\\\o sang on these occasions. Charles Simeon
was specially devoted to the Jews' Society; and so was Legh
Eichmond, the author of The Dairyman's Daughter and other
biographical sketches of Christians in humble life which had an
enormous circulation, who was not only Eector of Turvey, but
also Chaplain to the Duke of Kent. On one occasion, however,
when he was to preach at a Sheffield church for the Church
Missionary Society, he took as his text Eom. iii. 29, " Is He the
God of the Jews only? " Another anecdote tells the other way.
Simeon and Bickersteth were together on the platform at a Jews'
meeting. The former, in his speech, said the Society was " the
most blessed of all." The latter wrote to him on a slip of paper,
" Six millions of Jews, and six hundred millions of Gentiles —
which is the most important?" Simeon replied, "But if the
conversion of the six is to be life from the dead to the six hundred
— what then ?""''= The friendship of CM. S. was manifested by
the House in SaHsbury Square being lent to the Jews' Society for
its Committee meetings.
Yet another body closely connected with the Church Missionary
Prayer Socicty was the Prayer Book and Homily Society, which was a
Homify '' kind of Evangelical S.P.C.K. so far as its particular function was
Society. concerned. Prayer-books were then often pubHshed without the
Articles, and this Society was designed to secure that they appeared
in all the copies it supplied, It proved a useful ally to the
Missions in publishing translations of the Prayer-book in the
various vernaculars. The S.P.C.K. at that time was not likely to
print versions coming from the missionaries of an " unauthorized"
body like the Church Missionary Society.
Religious Then there was the Eeligious Tract Society, founded in the
Sockty. same year as C.M.S., 1799. Its first promoters were members of
" the Three Denominations," Presbyterians, Independents, and
Baptists ; but Churchmen quickly joined it, and Legh Eichmond
became one of the Secretaries, believing, to use his biographer's
words, "that he might promote the interests of his own Church
by preventing the circulation of tracts hostile to her opinions, as
well as advance the common cause of true religion." The great
work, at home and abroad, done by this Society is well known.
One feature of its early years is worth noting. Its anniversaries,
which the Missionary Register regularly reports, were held at
six o'clock in the morning of the day on which the Bible Society
also met, at the City of London Tavern. Breakfast was the
first item in the programme, and the Begister mentions that in
1823 no less than 1054 persons paid for their breakfast, and
hundreds more were unable to get in.
Noncon- With the London and Baptist Societies, and with the Moravian
formist
Societies.
* Memoir of E. Bickerstetli, vol. ii. p. 61.
C.M.S. AND Other Societies 155
and Wesleyan Missions —the last-named of which were at this Part III.
time being more regularly organized, the C.M.S. leaders also i^^'^"^^'
maintained a "friendly intercourse," in accordance with the ^^'
Society's 31st Law. They watched with sympathetic interest the
London Society's work in South Africa and the South Seas, and
its beginnings in China (Morrison's Chinese New Testament was
published in 1814) ; the Methodist revivals among the West Indian
Negro slaves ; the extraordinary industry and success of the
Baptists, Carey, Marshman, and Ward, in translating the Scrip-
tures into various Indian and other Asiatic languages ; and the
heroic enterprises of the Moravians. Also the connnencement of
organized Missions by the Foreign Protestant (Churches, and
by the Christians of the United States — especially the strange
experiences of the first American missionaries who attempted to
land in India. All these were regularly reported in the Beyister.
And in 1818 a plan w^as set on foot of the Secretaries of the
different Societies meeting quarterly (afterwards monthly) for
conference on topics of common interest. At first they were
held in the C.M.S. House ; afterwards in the different 6ffices in
turn.
One happy result of Pratt's energy in setting others to work
must be specially mentioned. In 1816, he addressed letters in
the name of the Committee to some of the bishops and other
leading members of the American Protestant Episcopal Church,
not asking for the aid of that Church for the Society, but offering
the aid of the Society, if needed, to enable the American Church
to give independent co-operation in the work of evangelizing the
Heathen. Very cordial letters were received in reply, particularly
from Bishop Griswold, of what was then callecl the "Eastern
Diocese," and Bishop White of Pennsylvania. Bishop Griswold
at first douloted whether the American Church was strong enough
to engage in Foreign Missions, and suggested that a clergyman in
his diocese who offered for missionary service should be adopted
by the Church Missionary Society. But Pratt, in repl}', urged
the formation of an American Church Society, which should send
him out itself, on the ground of the great reflex benefits that
would accrue to the Church itself from engaging directly in
missionary work ; and the Committee offered a grant of £200 to
help their American fellow-Churchmen to make a start. TJte
result was the establishment of tJie Domestic and Foreign Missionary American
Society of the American Church. In 1821, its organization was society.^'
completed, as a Society comprising and representing the whole
Church ; and the constitution is printed at length in the C.M.S.
Eeport of 1822. The American Church owes a deep debt of
gratitude to the S.P.G. for its labours among its people before the
Declaration of Independence which established the Eepublic of
the United States ; but it owes the initiation of its great Missionary
organization to the Church Missionary Society.
CHAPTER XIII.
Part III.
1812-2-4.
Chap. 13.
Previous
work in
W. Africa,
iSiERRA Leone .- The White Man's Grave and the Black
Man's Life.
Early Efforts— The Susoo Mission Edward Bickersteth's Visit Work
among the Liberated Slaves W. A. B. Johnson and H. During—
The Revival at Regent The Fever and its Victims— West Africa
not a Debtor but a Creditor.
"So then death v:orl-eth in -us, hut life in you." — 2 Cor. iv. 12.
N our Fifth and Ninth Chapters we saw how it came
to pass that the new Society found its sympathies
drawn out in an especial degree for Africa, and fixed
its eyes upon the West Coast. Not, in the first
instance, upon Sierra Leone. The Httle mountainous
peninsula was then only peopled by two or three thousand settlers,
liberated Negroes from England and from the other side of the
Atlantic ; and for them and the Europeans in charge of them the
Sierra Leone Company provided chaplains, Melville Home and
Nathaniel Gilbert (both of whom we have met before) being the
first. The Society had larger ideas. Not for the few settlers,
but for the great tribes and nations beyond, Susoos, Jalofs,
Temnes, Mandingoes, Fulahs, were its earliest plans formed.
Not a peninsula five-and-twenty miles in length, but a large
section of the great dark continent, was the object of their prayers
and efforts.
Some attempt had already been made by other societies to
j)lant the Gospel in Africa. The solitary S.P.G. missionary at
Cape Coast Castle in 1752, and his native successor, have been
mentioned in our Third Chapter. The Moravians had sent men
to the same Guinea Coast in 1768, but all had died. Among
the Hottentots of South Africa the same devoted Church had been
more successful ; while the Wesleyans, and the London Missionary
Society, had also bei^un good work among the southern tribes, the
latter having on its staff that remarkable missionary Vanderkemp.
To the neighbour] lood of Sierra Leone, the two small societies
in Scotland, the Glasgow and the Edinburgh, had combined to
send six men, to the Susoos ; but three had died, one (Peter
Greig) had been murdered by the Fulahs — -the first missionary
martyr in Africa, — and two had returned home ; and no further
effort was made to continue the Mission.
S/£Ji/i:A Leose : The White Man's Gra^e, o^c. 157
This last-named effort had directed the thoughts of the new Part III.
Enghsh Society to the Susoo tribes, north of Sierra Leone ; in 1812-24.
addition to which, several Susoo boys h.ad been brought to C'hap^l.}.
England by Zachary Macaulay, and were being educated at susoo boys
Claphani in a small school called the African Academy. The ^am*''
Committee engaged one of the returned Scotch missionaries, Mr.
Brunton, to prepare vocabularies, tracts, Sec, in the Susoo lan-
guage ; and, to establish a Mission among the Susoo people, the
earliest German missionaries were appointed.
We have seen that although it was easy to appoint men to West
Africa, it was not so easy to get them there ; and we have had
some glimpses of the difficulties and trials of the early voyages.
Still harder did it prove to get them from Sierra Leone, whitlier Early
the successive vessels took them, to their allotted field of labour ' duties,
among the Susoos, about one hundred miles to the north, on the
Rio Pongas. Physical dif^^iculties, such as rarity of communica-
tion, were not the greatest. The whole coast was dangerous,
owing to the virulent hostility of the slave-dealers. The Slave-
trade, it must be remembered, was not abolished till 1807 ; the
Act did not come into force in Africa till January 1st, 1808 ; and
even then, the enforcing of it was not an easy task. Moreover,
as has been related in a previous chapter, human infirmity
was manifested by the missionaries themselves ; dissension
finding entrance among them, and one having to be dismissed for
grave misconduct. Some little good work, however, was done in
Freetown, the capital of Sierra Leone, where many Susoos were
to 1)6 found ; and at length, in 1807, after more than three years'
delay, Leopold Biitscher succeeded in reaching the Rio Pongas
and arranging for a missionary settlement there. The others
quickly followed ; more men came out ; and in the next four or
five years three stations were occupied, Bashia and Canoffee on
the Pongas, and Gambler (so named after tlie President of the
Society, and not to be confounded with the River Gambia) ; in
addition to which, Nylander l)egan a ^fission among the BuUom
tril)e, on the mainland opposite Sierra Leone.
Nevertheless, the Susoo Mission was a very humble enterprise, ?".'°?
Iff i-ri T 1 1T-I Mission.
and tar from satisfactory according to our modern standard. It
was little more than two or three schools, in which German
missionaries, while still trying to pick up Susoo, were teaching
English — also a language they understood very imperfectly — to a
few African boys who were clothed and fed at the expense of the
Mission. Year by year the Committee had nothing else to tell
in their Annual Reports ; yet their faith, though often sorely tried,
never failed. The journals of the missionaries were regularly
published, and are even now interesting to read, for the graphic
accounts they give of the degradation of the people. And the
Committee felt assured that slow but sure work among the
children would in due time bear fruit. " Let us fervently pray,"
says the Annual Report of 1810, " that these children may become
158 Sierra Leone:
Part III. faithful disciples of our Great Master ; and that some of them may
1812-24. i^e raised up as instruments to proclaim the glad tidings of
Chap^lS. grj^ivation throughout their native tribes. It is in this way that
' we may expect God will be pleased to work when His time is
come for diffusing His Gospel widely through the nations, because
it is in this way that He has usually elTected His purposes
hitherto."
But the Committee wanted more than this. The care of the
children — many of them the offspring of the slave-dealers them-
selves-— had given the missionaries an entrance to the people ;
and Pratt wrote again and again urging them to take advantage of
it. Thus, in 1813 (combining two letters here) : —
" The public are now beginning to take a warm interest in the Society's
concerns. We have aroused their feelings and awakened their con-
sciences. Many eyes are turned on our missionaries. . . . Schools are our
foundation ; but the foundation is laid in order to the rearing of the
superstructure. . . . The time is come ! The natives know you now to
be honest men. Go as often, and as far into the Susoo country as you
can. . . . Preach Christ to them ! Let us have exact accounts of your
Susoo preachings : name your subjects, the number of your hearers, the
reception or rejection of the Word. Let it be known and felt all over
the Susoo country that you have a message to deliver them from God.
. . . Success belongs not to us, but attempts and exertions do."
The difficulties of obeying these counsels, however, were real
ones. For one thing, the missionaries were suspected of being
spies, and of informing the British ships of the secret smuggling of
slaves that was still going on, and the slave-dealers became worse
rather than better disposed towards the Mission ; and twice they
burned down the Mission houses. For another thing, the traffic
Foreign burst into fresh life when the Peace ensued in 1814 ; the Treaty
tride" of Paris restoring to France its old possessions in West Africa,
Goree and Senegal, and allowing her five years' grace before
putting an end to her slave-traffic — which practically meant the
resumption of it for that period. Wilberforce and his friends at
once woke up in England. The Society held a public meeting on
the subject, which was addressed by him and Henry Thornton
and James Stephen ; other meetings were held in London and
the Provinces ; hundreds of petitions were presented to Parliament,
with 755,000 signatures ; and addresses to the Crown were
adopted hy l)oth Houses. In the meanwhile, however, miscliiof
had been done. Tiie French slave-traders had not lost a moment
in resuming the traffic ; and of course, England and France
being now at peace, British ships had no power to interpose.
The deliverance, strangely enough, came through Napoleon.
When he left Elba and again threatened Europe, and " the
threatening clouds again darkened the heavens" (to use the
Com)nittee's words quoted before), one of his first acts was to
abolish the slave-trade entirely, hoping thereby to concihate the
Allied I'owers ; and when Waterloo once more restored the
The White A/.tAr's Grai^e Axn the Black Man's Life 159
Bourbons to tlie throne of France, tliey could not for very slianie Part III.
refuse to confirm the one good act of the vanquished usurper, j^l- i-'^
With great joy the Church Missionary Society saw all Eurojie ^'"'l> '•<•
imited on the question — always excepting Spain and Portugal,
which nations, uinnindful of the heavy debt they owed to England
for delivering them from the French conqueror, still persisted in
sanctioning the hateful trallic.
Then again, the missionaries were pressed hy secular concerns,
involved in maintaining the children. To remedy this, when
Biitscher returned to Africa after his short visit to England in
1812, (Jerman artizans were sent with him, with a view to their
relieving the missionaries of these duties ; hut they did not prove
very satisfactory. Sickness and death, too, frequently invaded
the Mission party, and, worst of all, dissensions again arose among
them. ^leanwhile, the ]X)pulation of the Colony of Sierra Leone Need of
was ra})idly growing. Thousands of slaves taken from the slave- Leone.
ships were landed at Freetown hy the Jiritish ci.iisers ; the
(lovernment perceived that Christian care and instruction were
more and more needed for them ; and projects began to be formed
for concentrating the Mission in Sierra Leone itself, and setting
the missionaries to minister to the still miserable though rescued
Negroes.
To arrange all this, to set things in order generally, and to
acquaint the Committee fully with all the circumstances of the
Mission, a man who could fully represent the Society was now
wanted ; and the eyes of the Committee fell on the Norwich
sohcitor, Edward Bickerstcth. Pratt, indeed, had already Bicker-
sounded him with a view to his taking holy orders, moving to w.* Africa.
London, and becoming Assistant Secretary ; and while he was still
considering that call, this further and most important summons
came. lie hesitated no longer, hut at once placed himself at
the Society's disposal, although a heavy pecuniary sacrifice would
be involved in giving up his profession. With a view to his
visiting Africa with adequate influence and fidl power of sacred
ministration, the Bishop of Norwich ordained him deacon at once
(December 10th, 1815), and also gave him letters dimissory to
the Bishop of Gloucester, that he might receive priest's orders a
few days later. On January 21th ho sailed for Sierra Leone.
The Instructions of the Committee given to Bickersteth arc,
like all Pratt's writings, full of wisdom and judgment. Two tasks
were committed to him, (1) to examine into the actual state of
the Mission, (2) to make or suggest plans for its more efTicient
working. The importance of the first part of his commission may
be gathered from the fact — so unlike anything in our modern
experience — that in twelve years, out of twenty-six men and
women who had gone to Africa, only two had visited England
since, and of these only one, Biitscher, had had information
to give the Committee. They had therefore been dependent on
correspoudeii'je and casual report. Bickersteth was accordingly
1 60 Sierra Leone :
Part III. instructed to converse with every member of the Mission sepa-
1812-24. rately, and with all other persons, English or African, who could
Chap. 13. ^gj^ Yiim anything at all. But to some he was to give exceptional
confidence : —
" If, under circumstances so likely to call for your Christian candour,
you find any men whose devout intercourse with their Heavenly Master
and His Holy Word have raised them, through the grace of the Divine
Spirit, above the influence of the temptations around them, and have
maintained the Life of God in a state of vigour in their own souls, you
will take such men to your heart ; you will be in an instant at home with
them ; you will place unlimited confidence in their assertions ; you wall
feel that they are far more competent than others to give you a sound
opinion on the objects of your mquiry ; you will unfold to them at large
the views and wishes of the Society ; you wiU kneel down with them at
the footstool of Him who waits to be gracious, and who delights in and
will crown these believing and patient efforts of His servants."
His influ- Bickersteth's visit was greatly blessed of God. It corrected
ence t ere. j^^^^^y gyiig j it initiated many new plans ; it gave a fresh impetus
to the whole work ; it proved the real starting-point of the perma-
nent Sierra Leone Mission. In personal matters, the best
testimony is that borne by the senior missionary Eenner, who had
himself not been without fault. " Our respected visitor," he
wrote, " was partial to none of us, but acted in a straight course,
dealing out meat in due season ; admonishing, reproving, or
comforting, as every one's situation or circumstances might
require." Sir Charles McCarthy, the Governor, reported to Earl
Bathurst, the Secretary for the Colonies, very highly of Bicker-
steth's influence. On leaving, he addressed a pastoral letter to
the brethren. In this admirable document he points out faithfully
the evil of any one missionary acting independently of the rest,
wdiich had been a fruitful cause of disunion. He lays stress on
our Lord's rule in Matt, xviii., " If thy brother shall trespass
against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him
alone." He exhorts to " a tender consideration of one another's
feelings, infirmities, situation, rights, and circumstances." He
significantly warns them that " the missionary has not only to
guard against the plague of his own heart, but lest he be hindered
in his work, and led into error, by the wife of his bosom." " The
veiy affection," he adds, "which is due in so dear a connexion
may mislead us."
Bickersteth had received authority to dismiss or suspend any
agent if necessary ; but he was not obliged to have recourse to so
painful a step. The missionary band was not to be reduced in
number in this way. It had, in God's mysterious providence,
been terribly reduced by death. Out of the twenty-six men and
women who had gone out before Bickersteth, sixteen, as before
mentioned, had died, besides children. There were now six
Lutheran clergymen in the Mission, Eenner, Nylander, Biitscher,
AVenzel, Wilhelm, and Klein ; and one schoolmaster.
The White Man's Grace and the Black Man's Life i6i
On missionary policy and methods, nothing can he more just Part III.
and discriminating tlian hoth liickersteth's injunctions to the 1812-24.
hrethren and his Report to the Committee. lie had, on the ^^''P- ^^•
whole, hecn pleased with the schools on the Pongas. At Bashia,
on Easter Day (April 14th, iHlG), he admitted six senior hoys to
the Lord's Suj)per, the first African conununicants in the Mission.
He realized the exceeding diflicidty of work among the adults,
most of whom were dehased and demoralized by the slave-trade ;
yet he could not refrain from plainly saying that they had not
had a fair chance of hearing the Gospel. The missionaries had
undoul)tedly been slack in this respect ; they had lacked boldness,
and love for dying souls ; they pleaded ignorance of the Susoo
language, but had not sought for interpreters. Bickersteth there- His
fore obtained a Native who could interpret a little, and went c"*"'?'*-
himself to preach in the villages, in order to show the brethren
how to do it and encourage them by his example ; and in his
pastoral letter he lays the greatest stress upon preaching the
Gospel, in season and out of season, as the first duty of a
missionary. " This is your first, your great work. Everything
else must be subordinate to this. Go in the dry season regularly
to the Susoo and BuUom towns. Take with you, if you find it
expedient, some of the children. Sing a Susoo or Bullom hymn.
Preach the Gospel, and pray with them ; and God will bless you."
Bickersteth's hope tliat the Susoo INIission might be maintained
and developed was not fulfilled. Not long after his return to
England, the hostility of the chiefs compelled its abandonment.
But the many prayers that had gone up for it were not left
unanswered. Not a few of the boys and girls in the schools gave
evidence of Divine grace in their hearts ; and one of the six
boys whom Bickersteth had admitted to the Lord's Supper was
honoured in a remarkable way to be an encouragement to praying
friends at home. His baptismal name was Simeon Wilhelm, and
he was the son of a Susoo chief of some note. He begged
Bickersteth to take him with him to England, in order, as he
said, that he might learn more fully what would fit him to teach
his countrymen ; and Bickersteth, though with much hesitation,
did so. The boy, then seventeen years old, lived at first at
Pakefield Kectory with Francis Cunningham ; but the east coast
proving too cold for an African constitution, he was taken in at
No. 14, Salisbury Square, by Bickersteth, who, it will be remem-
bered, then lived there ; and he attended an important school in
Shoe Lane, where the then young National Society was developing
its improved system of education. Simeon impressed every one
by the tlioroughness of his Christian character and the consistency
of his life ; but his health suddenly failed, even in an English
summer, and he died in the Church Missionary House, the first A Nep-o
garnered fruit visible to English eyes of the long-tried and much- ut'c'c-'m.'"
prayed-for West Africa Mission. He was buried in St. Bride's House.
Church, and Pratt preached a funeral sermon orj the text, " Is not
VOL. I. ji
1 62 Sierra Leone:
Part III. this a brand plucked out of the fire ? " Bickersteth wrote a
1812-24. memoh' of him, with every particular of his last days and hours,
Chap. 13. ^}^ji(3i^ occupies more than fifty columns of the Missionary Begister,
in three successive numbers, his portrait being given too.*
Nothing of this kind is ever published at the present day. We
do not keep diaries of the utterances of a sick-bed ; but this old
narrative cannot be read without emotion, and one realizes
something of the thankfulness and joy with which friends all over
the country read it then.
A very different career shows how God blessed the Susoo
Mission in quite unlooked-for fashion. In 1812, Biitscher had
brought to England a boy who had been baptized by the name of
Richard Wilkinson. This boy, on the eve of returning to Africa,
after residing a few months with Thomas Scott, was affectionately
addressed by the Committee and commended in prayer to God.
He d^d not, however, turn out well, and Bickersteth found him a
hindrance. The abandonment of the Mission led to his being lost
sight of ; and for more than forty years nothing more was done
The Rio for the Rio Pongas. In 1854, a new Mission was started there by
MisMon ^^ Association in the West Indies ; and when the first missionary,
Mr. Leacock, arrived, he was welcomed by a native chief, who, to
his astonishment, proceeded to repeat the Te Deitm. This was
Richard Wilkinson. For some years he had relapsed into
heathenism, but in 1835, being ill, he turned again to the Lord,
and from that time, for nearly twenty years, he prayed that a
missionary might once more come and teach his people. He
proved a steadfast friend to the new Mission, and died, grateful
and happy, in 1861. The Rio Pongas Mission is still carried on
by the Barbadoes Association, and is now affiliated to the S.P.G.
" Cast thy bread upon the waters : for thou shaft find it after
many days."
But to resume. Though Bickersteth did not contemplate
Plans for abandoning the Pongas, he came back to England full of the
L^one, possibilities of Sierra Leone. The recaptured slaves, in thousands,
from many tribes and nations, and of many languages, were being
clothed and provided for by the Government. But Christian
teaching and influence were sorely needed ; and what an opening
was thus presented for raising up, if the converting grace of the
Holy Ghost were vouchsafed. Native Christians who should
themselves in after years carry the Gospel to the interior, it might
be to the very countries from which they had been stolen ! This
was the grand work to which the Church Missionary Society now
girded itself.
While Bickersteth was laying his plans for the due occupation
of Sierra Leone before the Society, Sir Charles McCarthy, the
Governor, was sendmg corresponding plans home to the Secretary
for the Colonies. The Committee and Earl Bathurst accordingly
* July, August, and September, 1818.
The White Man's Grave and the Black Man's Life 163
arranged measures together. The peninsula was divided into Part III.
parisliL's, and the Society undertook to provide ministers and l«12-24.
schoohnasters, Government giving considerable pecuniary aid \ ^''^P- ^^•
central boarding-school, called the Christian Institution, \vas
established on Leicester Mountain, above Freetown, and here
were received nome two hundred boys and girls supported by the
special School Fund referred to in a previous chapter. Govern -
nient built a church at Freetown, and made provision for two
chaplains. Further details it is needless to give more fullv
Parts of these plans were settled before Bickersteth' went
out ; and the first four schoolmasters sailed a few weeks after
11m, arrived at Sierra Leone while he was there, and were
located by him. Two of these, both Gei'mans, Johnson and
During, received Lutheran orders at the hands of three of
their brethren, and afterwards became two of the very best
missionaries who ever laboured in West Africa. At the same
time, an excellent clergyman, Mr. Garnon, went out as Govern-
nient chaplain ; and soon afterwards the Society supplied a second
chaplain in the person of one of its students, Mr. Collier In the
next five years, to 1822 inclusive, seventeen more men were sent
out by the Society. Death continued to claim a sad tribute • the
sowing was still in tears; but a joyful reaping, at last, was now
at hand.
The most conspicuous instrument used by God to effect the
change was William Augustine Bernard Johnson. He was a t ^
native of Hanover. When eight years old, he was reproved by 'n'^"'""
his master one Monday morning, for only remembering one text ''"""^•
out of the Sunday morning sermon, which was, " Call upon Me in
the day of trouble: I will deliver thee, and thou shaltglorifv Ue "
ihe rebuke he received for remembering nothing else so aftected
him that this text was deeply imprinted on his mind for the rest
of his hfe; and very truly did it prove the key of his career.
Coming to l^^ngland after his marriage, he worked at a sugar-
refiner s m Whitechapel ; but business was slack, and wages low
and at length they were on the verge of starvation. Suddenlv the
text recurred to his mind, and he cried to God, not onlv for bread
but tor the pardon of his sins. In a quite unexpected wav lielp
came to them ; but, what was still better, both husband and wife
set themselves to serve the Lord with full purpose of heart from
that day In the following year, 1813, he chanced to be present
atone of tlie Church Missionary Society's valedictory meetings-
and his whole soul was fired with the thought of teaching The
Heathen also to "call upon the Lord." Two vears later, his
fellow-countryman Diiring, who was already accepted bv the
Society, introduced him to Pratt ; and in 1816, as already men-
tioned they sailed together, with two others, and the wives of
four, for Africa
all
Johnson was located by Bickersteth at Regent s Town (or as it Tohn.on .
was ultimately called, Eegent), one of the setdements of liWed fc^-t" ^'
M 2
164 Sierra Leone:
Part III. slaves, where some fourteen hundred of them had been placed.
1812-24. The description of them will answer equally well for any of the
Chap. 13. other "parishes," as they were called, Gloucester, Kissey
Leopold, Wilberforce, Bathurst, Waterloo, Charlotte, &c. Twenty-
two different tribes and nations were represented among them,
and the only medium of mutual comixiunication was a little
broken English. Their condition was deploral^le. Tbe purity of
the marriage state was unknown among them. They were
crowded — one may say herded — in miserable huts. They were
full of disease, and the latest arrivals were like skeletons. When
clothing was given them, they sold it ; and not till they saw a
modestly dressed negro servant-girl in Johnson's house did they
perceive the advantage of it. They shirked the labour of cultivat-
ing the ground, many of them preferring to hve by thieving. " If
ever I have seen wretchedness," wrote Johnson, on arriving at
Eegent, "it has been to-day. These poor depraved people are
indeed the offscouring of Africa. But who knows whether the
Lord will not make His converting power known among them ?
With Him nothing is impossible." So " in the day of trouble,"
once more, Johnson " called upon the Lord." And the promise
was abundantly fulfilled. Deliverance from despair was granted
at once ; and if ever a missionary was permitted to prove that
God had said to him in power, "Thou shaft glorify Me," it was
William Johnson.
The On July 14:th, 1816, his second Sunday, Johnson persuaded a
Revival, fg^y q{ '^y^q people to comc into his own hut early in the morning,
and sang and prayed with them. The Spirit of God at once gave
a blessing : their hearts wei'e touched, and all day long successive
little companies crowded into the hut. Next day he began school,
with ninety boys and a few girls, and forty-three adults in the
evening. In the following month, a stone church put up by Govern-
ment was ready, and very quickly the degraded people, under the
mighty Divine influence that was working in them, though they
knew it not, were attending in crowds. He invited them to visit
him privately. At first they only came for what they could
get ; but soon one and another and another appeared, deeply
convicted of sin, and crying to God for mercy ; and at earliest
dawn, before the daily prayers in chiu'ch at 6 a.m., Johnson
could see men and women kneeling under the bushes in secret
prayer. Saturday evening was again and again observed to
be a time of special blessing ; but Johnson did not then know
that the Church Missionarj^ Committee in London always met
on that evening for prayer. In October, only three months after
his arrival, twenty-one converts were baptized, carefully selected
from among a crowd of applicants ; and month by month other
baptisms followed. Nothing in missionary history is more touch-
ing than some of the utterances recorded of the now tamed and
humble people. " I cannot thank the Lord Jesus enough for this
good book," said one, "for I have seen myself in it." "How ig
The Wmih: AfA.\\s Gka]'e and the Black Mas^s Life i6'
it witli ycHii' heart?" one was asked: " Massa," was tlie reply, Part III.
" my licart no live here now ; my heart live there," pointing up- 1S12-24.
ward. A mutual henefit society was formed : " Dat he very good ^^'"P- ^"^
ting, broders," said one; " suppose one be sick, all be sick; one
be well, all be well." A missionary association was formed :
seventeen of the converts spoke, and one hundred and seven put
down their names as subscribers. Some of the speeches are
reported in the Ueijiater. Here is a fragment of one : —
"Mi.ssionary conu) hero, und proacli to us, and we i)ay iiotliin^.
Eni^iaud make u.s froe. and Iniiit,^ u.s to this eountry. My lnuthuis. (Jud
lia.s (lone ^'leat tliiiij^s for us. lint I liave denied Him Hke IV-ter. I am
guilty lu'fore Him; liut oli. may Hi; liave merey upon me! 1 am not
able to do anythini;. I pray tJod make us help God's word to c-over tlie
earth as the waters eover the sea. 1 l»elieve that word will eome true.
If any got a penny, let him give it, and pray God to bless our Society.'
This led to a general Churcli Missiunary Association being
formed for the Colony in 1819 ; mid the contributions in its first
year amounted to £(58 4i. 11(/.
Let us take one day out of Johnson's diary, September (Jth,
1817, fourteen months after his arrival : —
"The vestr}', the gallery stairs, the tower, the windows, were all
full. Some of the seats in the passages were over-weighted and broke
down. When I entered the church and saw tlie mu]titu<les, I could
hardly refrain myself. After evening service, one of the boys wished
to know if it were really true .Testis prayed for them. They had
been in the iiehl to pray, and did not know how. I spoke to'thein,
and they went hack with joy. It was a moonlight night, and the
mountains re-echoed with the singing of hymns, the girls, in one i)ait.
praying and singing by turns. The hoys liad got upon a high rock
with a light ; i)no gave out a hymn, and when tinishod, another engaged
in prayer. Many of the people, hearing, got up and joined them."
Revivals among emotional people like the Negroes are not
uncommon in America. ^lethodist camp-meetings are regular
agencies for producing them. But there the people are familiar
from infancy with the outline of the way of salvation. Here we
see absolutely ignorant and utterly degraded Heathen, with no
religious ideas beyond the superstitions of " grce-grees " or fetishes,
suddenly understanding what sin is. Who Christ is, how sin can be
put away, how Christ can be trusted and served ; and not merely
understanding these truths and giving play to the emotions
kindled by them, but exhibiting before the eyes of all around them itspracti-
transformed lives— honesty and purity and love in tlie place of*"^' ''^^''^^■
pilfering and uncleanness and incessant quariels. What could
eftect such a change? No missionary coidd do it; no army of
missionaries; but the Holy Ghost alone. But the Holy Ghost
works by means ; and the means He used at Regent - as so often
elsewhere — was a man wholly devoted to his work, really caring
for the souls of his flock, setting forth in all their simplicity and
fulness the great facts of sin and salvation, and trusting only to
1 66 SiERKA Leone
Paet III. the Spirit Himself to make the word effectual. And the result was
1812-24. seen in godly lives. Mr. Garnon, the chaplain, visited Eegent,
^^' ' and wrote of the people, " We could scarcely have expected such
evidences from those who have so long been far distant from God
by wicked works and gross ignorance. Their general characteristic
is loivly obedience. When Mr. Johnson has been out, they often
labour more than common to do a good day's work." And a
schoolmaster emploj'ed at Regent during a visit Johnson paid
to England was astonished at their " integrity, industry, and
docility."
Gospel The Gospel was not brought to these people by Civilization ; but
Civiiiza-^ the Gospel brought Civilization in its train. Here is the report
*'°"- of Regent two years after : —
" The Town itself is laid out with regularity ; nineteen streets are
formed, and are made plain and level, with good roads round the Town ;
a large stone Church rises in the midst of the habitations ; a Govern-
ment House, a Parsonage House, a Hosjiital, School Houses, Store
Houses, a Bridge of several arches, some Native dwellings, and other
buildings, all of stone, are either finished or on the point of being so.
But the state of cultivation further manifests the industry of the people :
all are farmers ; gardens, fenced in, are attached to every dwelling ; all
the land in the immediate neighbourhood is under cultivation, and
pieces of land even to the distance of three miles ; there are many rice-
fields ; and, among other vegetables raised for food, are cassadas,
yilantains, coco, yams, coffee, and Indian corn ; of fruits, they have
bananas, oranges, limes, pineapples, ground-nuts, guavas, and papaws ;
of animals, there are horses, cows, bullocks, sheep, goats, pigs, ducks,
and fowls ; a daily market is held for the sale of articles ; and on
Satiu'days this market is large and general. It has been already said
that all are farmers ; but many of them, l)eside the cultivation of the
ground, have learned and exercise various trades : fifty of them are masons
and bricklayers ; forty, carpenters ; thii'ty, sawyers ; thirty, shingle-
makers ; twenty, tailors ; four, blacksmiths ; and two, butchers. In
these various ways, upward of six hundred <.)f the Negroes maintain
themselves ; and have been enabled, in this short space of time, by the
fruits of their own productive industry, to relieve from all expense, on
their personal account, that Government to which they pay the most
grateful allegiance."
And an official Report on Roads and Public Buildings, issued in
1819, thus concluded its remarks on Regent : —
" Let it be considered that not more than three or four years have
passed since the greater part of Mr. Johnson's population were taken
out of the holds of slave-ships ; and who can compare their present
condition with that from which they were rescued, without seeing
manifest cause to exclaim, ' The hand of Heaven is in this ! ' Who can
contrast the simple and sincere Christian worship which precedes and
follows their daily labours, with the grovelling and malignant supersti-
tions of their original state, their gree-grees, their red-water, their witch-
craft, and their devils' houses, — without feeling and acknowledging a
miracle of good, which the immediate interjiosition of the Almighty could
alone have wrought ? And what greater blessing could man or nation
desire or enjoy, than to have been made the instruments of conferring
such sublime benefits on the most abject of the human race ?
The White Man's Grai^e and the Black Man's Life ibj
" If any other circumstance cuuld be required to prove the immediate Part III.
interposition of the Ahnitihty. we have only to h^ok at tlie plain men 1812-24.
and simple means employed in brincjing about the miraculous conv(!rsion Chap. 13.
that we have recorded. Does it not recall to mind the first difTusion of ■
the Gospel by the Apostles themselves? These thoughts will occur to
strangers, at remote distance, when they hear these things ; and must
they not occur much more forcibly to us who have these things
constantly before our eyes ? "
In 1819, Mrs. Johnson, who had heen doing excellent work
among the women and girls, was ordered home, sick, and her
hushand had to accompany her to England. On Easter Day,
about ten days before they sailed, he baptized 253 adult converts, johnson-s
and administered the Holy Communion to 258. The parting '=°"v«''^s.
with his people brought out all the love they had learned to feel
for him. With many tears they crowded the shore to bid him
farewell, saying, " Massa, suppose no water live here, we go with
you all the way, till no feet more ! " The time of his absence was
a time of testing, of winnowing and sifting, for the Native Church ;
and one of the converts afterwards described it thus : — " Massa,
before you go from this place you preach, and you say, ' Suppose
somebody beat rice, when he done beat, he take the fan and fan
it, and then all chaff fly away, and the rice get clean. So God do
Him people : He fan the chaff away.' Now, Massa, we been in
that fashion ever since you been gone to England. God fan us
that time for true." Nevertheless, when Johnson returned to
Africa in the following Januar5^ he found the people, as he said,
" hungering after the word of God more than ever." His journals,
and those of other missionaries in the Colony, fill many pages of
the Missionari/ licgister, and of Appendices to the Annual Reports ;
and the details of his daily ministrations among the people, the
evidences of grace in their hearts and lives, and the illustrations
also of the devil's power to cause inconsistency and backsliding
in some, are most touching.
But it was not at Regent only that the Spirit of God was
working. Mr. During's labours at Gloucester met with blessing
little less remarkable ; and indeed almost all the parishes showed
improvement which astonished those who visited them, and
elicited warm testimonies from the Government officials and other
independent witnesses. Thus Sir George Collier, the Commodore Official
of the West African Scjuadron, wrote, —
" More improvement under all circimistances of climate and infancy
of ct)lony is scarcely to be sui)posed. I visited all the black towns and
villages, attended the public schools and other establishments; and I
have never witnessed in any population more contentment and happiness.
... I have attended places of public worship in every quarter of the
globe, and I do n\ost conscientiously declare that never did I witness
the services of religion more piously performed or more devoutly attended
to than in Sierra Leone."
The Chief Justice of the Colony in 1822, the Hon E. Fitzgerald,
testified that while, ten years before, with a population of 4000,
testi-
monies.
i6S Sierra Leone :
Part III. there were forty cases in the calendar for trial, now, with the
1812-24. population increased to 6000, there were only six cases ; and not
Chap. 13. Q^g ^£ ^j^ggg .^g^g from any village superintended hy the mission-
aries. The Governor, too, Sir Charles McCarthy, a man who by
his high character, wisdom, and untiring energy, conferred in-
estimable benefits on the Colony, attended the Committee while
on a visit to England, and bore strong testimony to the reality of
the missionary work.
The joy of the Committee, and of friends all over the country,
was the kind of joy of which we commonly say that it knows
no bounds ; but this phrase would be incorrectly applied here.
Their joy did know bounds. The journals were read with keenest
interest and thankfulness ; and when Johnson visited England,
his simple and unaffected recital of God's work at Regent made a
deep impression everywhere. Yet the Committee, and the leading
friends, knew well that the great Enemy of souls would not let
Caution alone such a work as that. The expressions about it in the
Com-'*^*^' I^sports are cautious and moderate; the missionaries are com-
mittee, mended for so carefully testing the candidates for baptism — as
indeed they did, — and enjoined to redouble their vigilance, if that
were possible, and their watchfulness also as regards their own
personal Christian life. Satan " desired to have " them as well
as their converts ; and the infirmity of human nature is illustrated
by the withdrawal of four schoolmasters, and the dismissal of
two, during that very time of blessing, 1818-22. Moreover, there
were reminders year by year of the perils to life and health at
Deaths Sierra Leone. The deaths up to 1815 inclusive have already
Leorfe."^^ been mentioned. In 1816, one of the new schoolmasters died a
few weeks after landing. In 1817 was Blitscher's home-call,
and that of another schoolmaster. In 1818, Wenzel died, and
one of the wives; in 1819 two schoolmasters and another wife, —
one of the former, J. B. Cates, a man of exceptional power and
excellence, "our right hand," as Mr. DUring called him ; ='• in
1820 one of the wives ; in 1821, the senior of them all, and No. 1
of the entire C.M.S. roll, Melchior Renner, after seventeen years'
unbroken service in Africa. Moreover, in 1818-19, both chaplains,
Mr. Garnon and Mr. Collier, died, and Mrs. Collier, t
Full accounts of the sickness and death of all these brethren
and sisters were published in the Begister, and called forth wide-
spread sympathy and fervent prayer. It is hard to say which are
the most moving, the trustful and sometimes joyful utterances of
the dying soldiers of the Cross, or the courageous faith that
* Cates's motlior went to one of the Annual Meetinofs at Freemasons'
Hall. To prevent overcrowding, only subscribers were admitted. " Are you
a subscriber?" "No," said the poor woman, and sadly turned away.
Suddenly she reappeared : " Yes," she exclaimed ; " I am a subscriber ; I
have given an only son." — Life of Josiuh Pratt, p. 382.
t A special chapter follows this one, giving fuller personal details of some
of these brethren and sisters.
The White Max's Ghave and the Black ATak's Life i6q
breathes in tlie letters of tlie survivors. But even after all this, Part III.
the worst was yet to come. In 1823, the yellow fever broke out, 1812-2-t.
and wrought havoc in the Colony. Many officers and civilians ^^^P_'"^-
fell a victim to it. The Chief Justice, the Colonial Secretary, a
member of the Governor's Council, three doctors, two chaplains,
and many others, all died within a few weeks. The Chief Justice
was deeply mourned by the whole Colony, having been universally
esteemed as the friend of every Christian and philanthropic work.
Two thousand Negroes attended his funeral. Nyliinder wrote
that Sir C. McCarthy, the Governor, was absent on the Gold
Coast, but was daily expected. " lie will be astonished to see
the Colony almost empty of Public Officers — no Lawyer — no Judge
— no Secretaiy— only one Writer, and three IMembers of Council
— no Chaplain — one Schoolmaster — only thiee Medical Men -and
a few Missionaries ! "
But the missionaries were not exempt. In 1823, seven new
schoolmasters and five wives landed at Sierra Leone. Of these
twelve persons, six died in that year, and four more within
eighteen months. ^'^ Then came the home-call of William Johnson
himself. He had left his wife in England ; and in this year,
being crippled by ophthalmia, he received leave to go home and
see her, as she was not expected to live long. Three days after
he sailed, the fatal fever, which no doubt was already on him,
appeared ; and after four more days, the evangelist of Regent Deaths of
yielded up his spirit to the Lord, and his body was committed to i°d"''°"
the deep, at the age of thirty-four, and after seven years of a During,
missionary life to which there are few parallels in the whole
history of the Church. Then Diiring took the fever, and, while
almost at the point of death, was put on board a ship, with his
wife, to be taken if possible to England. The vessel sailed on
August 31st, and was never again heard of. She was supposed
to have foundeied, with all on boaid, in a terrible gale in the
English Channel in the first week of November. Thus perished
also the evangelist of Gloucester Town, where a work of God had
been manifested only second to that at Regent. The two Hano-
verians who together had studied at the National Society's
Central School, who together had sailed for Africa, who together
had received the instructions of Edward Bickerstetli on the spot,
who together — or rather, simultaneously — had entered upon the
arduous task of reclaiming the most degraded of mankind, who
together had rejoiced over the aljundant tokens of the Holy
Spirit's converting and sanctifying work, now almost together
entered into th(! presence of their Lord.1
* See next cliaptor.
t The old Memoir of W. A. B. Johnson lias been loiif,' out of print; but
>r. A. T. Pierson lias lately given the gist of it in a very attrat-tive form in
is St'rcn Years in Sierra Leone (Now York, 1897). Dr. Pier-on thinks
Jdhnson's narrative "the most remarkable story of seven years' missionary
labour " ho " ever read."
Dr
170 Sierra Leone:
Part III. The Committee were for the moment crushed by all this over-
1812-24. whelming sorrow. They gazed in one another's faces across the
Chap. 13. ^jj^i^jg . ^Yiey knelt together at the footstool of Divine Mercy ; and
Attitude of the tradition is that one leading lay member, on the day that the
mfttee'" iiews Came of several deaths, rose and said in a tone of deep
feeling and firm resolve, "We must not abandon West Africa."
And when, at the following Anniversary, they had to present their
Report, the language is singularly calm and courageous : —
"The Committee scarcely know whether to speak in the language of
grief or of joy, of sorrow or of triumph — so mingled have been, of late, the
Divine Dispensations. In no one year lias the Society ever suffered a
greater loss in its Friends and Labourers, while in no one year has there
been a more evident blessing on their labours. The alleviations of its
heavy trials have been remarkable. They have given occasion for a
special manifestation of Divine Grace. Those who have died have died
in the Lord, thanking God for calling them to His work, and glorifying
His Holy Name in the midst of their sufferings. Their surviving relatives
around them have expressed entire resignation to the Divine Will, in
the very midst of their trials, and this just before they themselves were
called to their everlasting reward. The survivors seem to have had their
faith elevated above the trying circumstances in which they had been
placed, and to have become more entirely united, and devoted to their
work. The Society will see in this state of things a peculiar manifesta-
tion of the character of the work, whose laboiirers have often had to say,
' As dying, and behold we live — as sorrowful, yet always rejoicing.' Their
Heavenly Master illustrates the power and the abundance of His own
grace, in the very weakness of His servants ; and He carries on His own
work, while He removes to their eternal reward those instruments whom
He has most highly honoured."
Several of the schoolmasters were Germans, not from Berlin as
of old, but from the new Basle Seminary ; and the news of their
Zeal of deaths made a deep impression upon the students. "Every one
Basle men. ^£ ^^^^. ij^.e^hren," wrotc Blumhardt, the Director, "is preparing
himself to come forward and offer himself as a sacrifice to the
Lord. Should many more such tidings of an immortal world
arrive, we could not longer detain our dear brethren-soldiers
from going to the spot where the Heroes of the Church have
fallen."
The tidings of Johnson's death at sea did not reach Sierra
Leone till they had come to England by the ship he died in and
Ijeen communicated by another ship to Africa ; and appeals from
the brethren to send him back quickly, and many letters from his
converts to himself about the sickness and the sorrow oppressing
the Colony, kept arriving at Salisbury Square long after he had
Regent been called away. But when at last Regent heard of it, a fresh
*^astor°s '^^ and remarkable pi'oof of the genuineness of religion in the people
death. was afforded. The schoolmaster in charge, when reading out the
news, begged them to be calm and quiet ; and though the whole
congregation were instantly in tears, none of the noisy outcries
were heard which had been so natural to them in the past.
The White Man's Gra ve and the Black Mans Lite 171
Presently they rose and sang a liymii which Johnson had taught Part III.
them, and of which he was very fond : — 1812-24.
•' Chap. 1:^.
In every troublo sharp and strong,
My soul to Jesus flies ;
My anchor-hold is firm in Him,
When swelling billows rise.
Bin comforts bear my spirits up;
I trust a faithful God ;
The sure foundation of my hope
Is in my Saviour's blood.
Loud Ilallolujahs I will sing
To mj- Redeemer's Name ;
In joy and sorrow, life and death,
His love is still the same.
At the usual Prayer Meeting on the following Saturday evening,
several of the converts spoke lovingly of their departed friend and
pastor; and one of them said, "We thought too much of Mr.
Johnson, though he was a good man. God will not suffer us to
put confidence in any hut the Lord Jesus Christ. My dear
brethren, I think God took him away, l^ecause we looked more
to Mr. Johnson than we did to Jesus."
In the next three years several more deaths occurred, among More
them that of Nylander, the oldest missionary after Renner was '*^^**'^-
taken away, being No. 3 on the Society's roll. He had laboured
nineteen years in Africa without once coming to Europe. He
was the founder of the BuUom Mission, and in his later years
was looked up to as the veteran of the Colony. When he died
in 1825, only one man was left who had gone out before 1820.
This was Wilhelm, one of the fourth party (1811), and No. 10 on
the roll. In 182G, out of a total of seventy-nine persons, mis-
sionaries, schoolmasters, and wives, who had gone out in the
twenty-two years, only fourteen remained ; tlie large majority of
the remainder being dead.
This chapter may appropriately be concluded by quoting from
a striking letter addressed to the Committee in the midst of their
trials by a friend of the Society whose name is not given : —
" We ought not to bo discouraged by our lo.ssos in Africa ; since, even
on the principle of justice, we .should be very liberal to that country.
For what has influenced the public mind so much as tlie interesting
accounts conuaunicated respecting that country 'i I tirnily believe that
three-fourths of the zeal for Mis.sions now evident among us was first
excited by the state of Africa. Go and tell of rains, and fevers, of
graves, of deaths, of niis.sionaries dead, of missionaries dying, of mis-
sionaries fainting under the burden and heat of tlie day, tell of the good
already done, and that others are panting to enter into tlii.s very Held —
these things will produce even more beneficial effects than they have
ever yet prochiced : tliey will produce sufficient funds for the support,
not only of the African Mission, but of the whole. Such a labourer as
this is surely worthy of its liire : an advocate so touching, so eloquent,
172 S.'£RJ^A Leone: The White Man's Grai'e^ &^c.
Part III. so successful, should be well repaid. In fine, notwithstanding the
1812-24. Society's expenditure upon Africa, Africa is an advantage to the Society-
Chap. 13. — a creditor, and not a debtor."
Africa the
xA'orld's
Yes, and so Africa always has been. To India, to China, to
creditor, all other Misslon-fields, Africa is a Creditor, not a Debtor. The
deep interest and living sympathy again and again aroused in
behalf of Africa, by the enterprises of various Missions, whether
on the Niger, or the Congo, or the Zambesi, whether on Lake
Nyassa or the Victoria Nyan^a, whether at Sierra Leone or
Kuruman or Zanzibar or Mombasa, have again and again been
manifested in personal consecration and in the dedication of
substance to the Lord, by which every other part of the world
has been the gainer.
CHAPTER XIV.
The Finished Course.
Miss Childe's Book -Some Martyrs for Christ in West Africa— Rev.
W. Garnon— Gates— A Negro's Wail— Mr. and Mrs. Palmer—
C. Knight and H. Brooks— Nylander's Daughters— Kissey Church-
yard.
" / am now ready to be offered. . . . I hare finished my cov.rse."~2 Tim. iv. 6, 7.
HEN we read St. Paul's touching words, " I nm now Part III.
ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at 1812-24.
hand ; I have fought a good fight, I have tinished my Cliap. U.
course, I have kept the faith," — and remember that
they were written in his old age from the Mamertine
Prison at Rome, we think naturally of his long career and his
" labours more abundant," and our idea of a " finished course " is
of a long life of usefulness at length laid down. But a " finished
course " need not be a long one. Both the sons of Zebedee finished a finished
their course, although one was the first apostle to fall, and the '=°"''^^-
other outlived all the rest. The Lord Himself, at the age of thirty-
three, could say, " I have finished the work which Thou gavest
Me to do: and now come I to Thee." Yes, "the work which
Thou gavest me to do " ; not necessarily the work which we in
our shortsightedness may have purposed or aspired to do. " Im-
mortal till his ivork is done " — so the Christian has been well
described ; yes, but the work appointed by the Divine Master may
be a very small one, and when that work is finished, the "com-se"
is finished too.
The words thus chosen for the title of tliis chapter are the title M'ss
of a book written more than thirty years ago by the daugiiter of book!^'^
the venerated former Principal of the Church INIissionary College,
the Rev. C. F. Childe, but now out of print. ^'^ No more beautiful
and touching book has ever been publislied. In simple language
it sketches the careers of some of the earlier C.M.S. missionaries,
most of them in Africa, whose "finished course" was a very
brief one. The present chapter consists chiefly of a few gleanings
from that volume, supplemented from the original records. The
scope of our History does not permit of many biographical details
* The Fini-ihed Course: Brief Notices of Departed Church Uissionaries.
Seeley&Co., 1865.
174 The Finished Course
Part III. of the missionaries being introduced ; but we may at this point
1812-24. I'ightly turn aside for a moment from the general narrative, to
^P' ■ behold the triumphs of Divine Grace in some of the brethren and
sisters whose "course " was quickly " finished."
One of the most interesting of these faithful labourers was not
a C.M.S. missionary at all, in the strict sense of the word. His
name does not appear on the roll. But to all intents and purposes
he was a C.M.S. missionary nevertheless. In the early days of
Sierra Leone, the Committee now and again picked out their best
men and gave them to the Government to send out as chaplains ;
and while the regular missionaries were either German Lutheran
ministers or English schoolmasters and artizans, Englishmen
qualified for ordination were allotted to the not less important —
Garnon the ^nd more prominent and influential — office of chaplain. One of
chaplain, these was the Eev. William Garnon.
William Garnon was an orphan brought up by an uncle, Captain
James Garnon, who had seen much active service, and filled his
nephew's mind with the glories of a soldier's life. William in due
course obtained a commission in the 14th Foot, and served in
Spain under Sir John Moore, and in the ill-fated Walcheren
Expedition. The Walcheren fever shattered his health, and during
the long period of delicacy that followed he came under the
influence of a godly aunt at Brighton, and ultimately, through a
faithful sermon he heard there, was converted to Christ. Being
introduced to William Wilberforce, he was encouraged by that
great man to study for the ministry; and after ordination and a
short service in England as curate, he was appointed to the
Chaplaincy at Sierra Leone. He sailed thither, accompanied by a
young wife, in September, 1816, at the very time that Edward
Bickersteth was returning to England.
The difference between a chaplain and a missionary in West
Africa was little more than one of status and salary. Government
connexion and pay being a good deal higher than that of a
missionary society. The chaplains threw themselves heartily into
missionary work, and the missionaries performed the chaplains'
duties when death or absence left vacancies. Mr. Garnon proved
a true missionary, travelling among the villages, encouraging the
brethren, addressing their congregations, instructing their classes.
It was the period of the revivals under Johnson and During,
described in the preceding chapter; and Garnon's help and counsel
were of the greatest value.
Sunday, July 19th, 1818, was a day of arduous service at
Freetown, and Garnon was tired out. In the middle of the night
he was called up by a messenger from one of the German
missionaries, Mr. Wenzel, who was dying ; and in a few minutes
a second messenger followed, urging him to come quickly. His
wife, dreading the exposure for him in his fatigued condition,
begged him to wait till the morning; but his reply was, " If the
doctor is sent for, he is not afraid to go instantly ; neither must
The Finished Course 17-
I." He rode on horseback four miles through heavy rain ; and Part HI.
two days after he was struck down by fever. At the same time, 1812-2-^.
in the same house, the assistant-chaplain, Mr. Collier (who had ^^^P" ^'*-
been a C.M.S. student), and Mrs. Collier, were also lying ill ; and
Mrs. Garnon herself was daily expecting the advent of her first-
born. On the 28th Mrs. Collier died ; and the missionaries who More
came together for her funeral that evening, knelt round her coffin, deaths,
and prayed the Lord, if it were His will, to raise up both the
chaplauis. INIi-s. Garnon, who had been tenderly nui-sing her
husband with the little strength she had, was now obliged to
retn-e; but Johnson, During, and Gates, watched through the
night. Eapidly, however, their beloved friend and counsellor
sank, saymg with almost his last breath the Apostolic Benediction
over himselj—^^ The gi-ace of om- Lord Jesus Christ, and the love
of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Ghost, he with me";
adding, a moment afterwards, " Yes, they are ivith me." In the
early morning of July 29th, just two days after his twenty-seventh
birthday, William Garnon entered into rest; and thus on two
successive evenings the bereaved band of missionaries assembled
round an open grave. Next day, Garnon 's little son was born
On the third day, the sick German, Wenzel, died, and was buried.
''And now, dear Sirs !" wrote Gates, reporting these deaths,
" be not discouraged ! Let more labourers put their lives in their
hands, and come to help those that are left. Ethiopia shall soon
stretch out her hands unto God ! " Then, when Gates himself
died in the following year, and the other chaplain, Mr. Colliei-,
and Mrs. Jesty (a most devoted woman, whose husband only
survived her six months), During wrote :
"When it ploasos God to visit His people with afflictions, those who
arc His are best seen, and distin-uislied from tli..se wlio bear His name
but are none of His. Wliile those whose only hope is in this life are
tcrrifie.l by soenig niuiibers of their fellow-mortals liurriod into eternity
the true Christian is enal)led to stand like a eliild by his Fatlier's side'
and SCO with serenity what Ifr is doini,^ . . . T would Innubly say to mv
superiors, He not dismayed at tlie dark dispensations of our (ic.d'' Fear
not: for tlio Saviour shall yet see of the travail of His soul amon^r the
tribes of Africa. T am not cast down : I know that the Lord can work
by a single individual as much as liy a thousand ; only I would crave
your earnest prayers for us the survivors."
Another wrote,— " We are not discouraged, but encouraged;
and if we are so who stand in jeopardy every hour, why should
not you be ? Send us another Cates-^an Elisha instead of our
Elijah ! ' And Nylander, alluding to a report that had reached
bierra Leone that the Society was gravely thinking of abandoning-
the Mission, urges the blessing that God had alreadv vouchsafed
to the labours of those who had been taken awav, and even to
the silent influence of those who had been but a few weeks in the
country, mentioning actual cases of conversion brought about by
God using the words and lives of some with the briefest careers.
176 The Finished Course
Part III. " Look forward for your reward ! " he writes to the Committee ;
1812-24. << though the bodies of our brethren are removed from among us,
Chap^l4. yg|. ^Y^^ ggg^l ^vhich they sowed keeps growing." One simple
A Negro's letter in broken English must be quoted, written to Mr. Johnson
wail. while in England by one of his converts. It gives the most vivid
picture of all : —
" That time Mr. Cates sick, and Mr. Morgan sick ; and poor Mr. Gates
die. Then Mr. CoUiur get sick, and Mr. Morgan get sick again ; and
one friend said, * God soon leave this place ' ; and I said, ' I trust in the
Lord Jesus : He knows His people, and He never loft them, neitlier
forsake them'— and thtui, next Sunday, Mr. Gollier die--then Mr.
Moro-an sick — Mrs. Morgan sick — Mr. Bull sick. Oh ! that time all
Missionaries sick ! We went to Freetown Monday, and bury Mr. Gollier
we come home again, and keep service in Church. Oh, that time
trouble too much in my heart. Nobody to teach me, and I was so sorry
for my poor country-people. Mr. Gates die — Mr. Collier die — Mr.
Morgan sick — oh, what must I do for my countrymen ! But I trust in
the Lord Jesus : He know what to do ; and 1 went to pray, and I say,
' O Lord, take not all the Teachers away from us ! ' "
The sad The year 1823 was another specially sad time, as mentioned
year 1823. ]-,gf(^j,g * j^ January of that year a vessel from England arrived at
Sierra Leone, bringing back Mr. and Mrs. During, and bringing also
no less than thirteen new labourers, and a new colonial chaplain
and his wife. The same ship, sailing again for England, took in
it W. A. B. Johnson. Now observe what the hand of death did
in that vear. On April 20th one of the new men was taken ; on
April 25th a second ; on May 3rd Johnson died at sea ; on May
6th a colonial chaplain returning home also died at sea ; on May
7th the new chaplain was called aw^ay ; on June 6th his wife ;
on June 22nd the wife of the first man taken ; on June 25th
another wife ; on June 28th another of the new band ; on
November 26th yet another. In that November, too, Mr. and Mrs.
Diiring were lost at sea. It was at the same time that the Colony
w^as so bereft of its officials, as before recorded. t Let us now just
glance at two members of this martyr-band — as they may w^ell be
called, — the new chaplain and his wife, the Eev. Henry and Mrs.
Palmer.
Mr. and Mr. Palmer, like Mr. Garnon, had been in the army. He had
Pa^imer fought at Waterloo, and had served in many distant chmes ; and
a man thus inured to hardship seemed to the C.M.S. Committee
exactly fitted for the dangerous post of Sierra Leone, and was
accordingly recommended by them to the Government. Moreover
he was of a singularly bright and joyous spirit, that could be
trusted not to give way to depression. His young wife was the
daughter of a country clergyman, the Eev. John Noble, Vicar of
Frisby, Leicestershire, and had been the sunshine of the village.
It was not till Mr. Palmer was about to sail for Africa that she
was married. In her tw^entieth year she was cheerfully laid on
* See p. 169. t See p. 169.
The Finished Course i^-j
the altar of sacrifice by her parents ; and it is related that, just Part in
before starting for church for the wedding, she suddenly sat down 1812-24.'
at the piano and sang Kelly's hymn— not so familiar now as it ^*'^P- 1^-
once was— "We've no abiding city here"; which led their
thoughts up from the dreaded African shore to the " city out of
sight," the " city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker
IS God." But the beautiful prayer in the Marriage Service re-
minded them that it is those who " obey His will " that are
" always in safety under His protection."
In the Memoir of Eobert Noble, the great educational missionary
in the Telugu country, it is recorded that, when he was a boy, his
elder sister, who was going out to the Mission-field, passed through
the town of Oakham, where he was at school, very early In
the morning, called to bid him farewell, saw him in bed, and gave
him a Bible as a parting gift, saying, " Eobert, read your Bible."
That sister v%-as Anne Palmer.
On their arrival at Sierra Leone they were temporarily quartered
with W. A. B. Johnson at Regent. When, three months later,
he was about to start on that voyage which he did not live to
complete, Mrs. Palmer had the privilege of being present at the
memorable farewell communion service, and wrote home with
overflowing joy of the four hundred and twenty Negro Christians
among whom she had knelt at the Lord's Table. On May 3rd
INIr. Palmer's predecessor in the chaplaincy, the Rev. S. Flood,
sailed for England— which he, too, never reached. Tlie next day,'
Sunday, Mr. Palmer pi-eached at Freetown on the opening words
of the Lord's high-priestly prayer, " Father, the hour is "come."
In the middle of the sermon he felt the fever seize upon him ; and
on reaching home he said with deep emotion that if he never had
another opportunity of declaring the Gospel, he believed he had
faithfully declared it that day ; and then with solemn emphasis he
repeated his text, "Father, the hour is come!" Within three
days he was gone. The veteran Nyliinder wrote, " Had he fallen
at Waterloo when he fought there, would not his death have been
counted honourable ? Is not his death hero in tlie Loi'd's battle
more honourable? " The young widow wrote, " He who cannot
err, whose love to His people can never fail, has seen fit to take
my beloved husband to Himself. Can I reply against God ? I
cannot; I will not. The hour was come, and His name was
glorified."
She, too, now took the deadly disease. From her sick-bed she
wrote to a schoolmaster's wife in Sierra Leone, " May you and
your husband hold each other as loans, together with every other
precious gift which our God may bestow upon you." Three
weeks after her own husband's death, the babe was born whom
her fellow-missionaries had looked for to cheer her in her sorrow ;
but it was born only to die ; nnd six days after, " tlie hour " came
for the young mother too. On June 6th she fell asleep.
The missionary who reported these losses was a young school-
VOL. I.
N
178
The Finished Course
14.
Part III. master conspicuous for piety and devotion, one of the party who
1812-24. \^c^^ only come out in the previous January, Phihp Vaughan.
It w^as his wife to whom Mrs. Pahner wrote the message ahove-
quoted. That wife was the next to be struck down. The narrative of
her last days is one of the most touching of the many touching
narratives of that fatal year. Her sick-chamber was indeed the
house of God and the gate of heaven. Her utterances of faith and
hope are most beautiful. Not for a moment did she repine. " I
have never repented," she said, "one single step I took towards
coming here. I sought my God's direction, and I firmly believe I
had it, both by the teaching of His Spirit and the leadings of His
Providence." To her, too, a child was born, but born only to die ;
and, shortly after, she " finished her course," literally " with joy."
Out of six labourers in Freetown alone, three months before,
only Vaughan himself now remained ; and he, too, joined them
in the presence of the Lord in the following November. The
widow of another of the martyr-band came and took charge of the
girls' school ; but she also was taken within a few months.
There was no C.M.S. missionary in Freetown left to smooth her
dying pillow ; the veteran Nyliinder was lying dangerously ill at
the neighliouring village of Kissey ; and a young Wesleyan mis-
sionary, Mr. Harte, was alone privileged to receive her parting
messages. He too died soon after ; and Nylander himself in the
following year.
But before Nyliinder's death, two other valuable men had
arrived, and had died. The Committee, deeply feeling the im-
portance of sending good men to the two stations which had been
so greatly blessed under Johnson and Diiring, Eegent and
Gloucester, appointed to the Sierra Leone Mission, for the first time,
two of their English candidates who had been ordained, Charles
Knight and Heni-y Brooks. Knight was a brother of one of the
four men who had formed the first band of missionaries to Ceylon.*
Brooks, like Henry Williams of New Zealand, had been a
lieutenant in the Navy. The words of Edward Bickersteth's
charge to them at the Valedictory Meeting, show incidentally
which of the brethren who had died in Africa were held in
special estimation for their faithfulness and zeal. " You are
about," said Bickersteth, "to tread in the steps of Garnon, and
Johnson, and Diiring, and Vaughan " ; though he added, " and
many others of the excellent of the earth, who are gone from the
scene of your future labours to their heavenly rest. Follow them
as they followed Christ."
They sailed on November 3rd, 1824, but contrary winds drove
their vessel into Cowes, and there they were detained just two
months. Brooks, recalling his naval experiences, wrote, "How
different are my circumstances, views, hopes, from what they
were when I was last in this port ! Then, we were waiting for a
See p. 216.
The Finished Course 179
fair wind in order to carry out the declaration of War against the Part III.
Americans. Now, we are waiting for a favourable gale to enable 1812-24.
us to go and pi'each the Gospel of Peace to the Africans. Then, I Chap^i-t.
was in fear and apprehension. Now, I am tranquil, blow high or
blow low, because I am assured that my God watcheth over
me." At length they got away, and reached Sierra Leone on
February 3rd.
Knight took charge of Gloucester, and Brooks of Regent. Both
stations had greatly suffered during the year and a half that had
elapsed since their bereavement. The Negro Christians, easily
led this way or that way, had sadly backslidden. But within a
few weeks, the two new pastors had the joy of seeing most of
them come back ; and all looked bright and hopeful. But very
quickly was their course finished. On the sixth Sunday of his
ministry, Knight was struck by the fever, and had to commit the
services to the schoolmaster, though by a great effort he succeeded
in administering the Communion. That the Lord was calling him
away he did not doubt for a moment ; but he faced death witliout
a shadow of fear. He did, however, think of the effect of it in
England. " It will be such a discouragement to the Society," ho
said : " and it will prevent others coming out.'' Brooks liastoncd
over from Kogent, in time to bid his comrade farewell, and, on
the evening of his death, their seventli Sunday in Africa, to com-
mit his body to the grave. Then he went back to his own post,
and on the thirteenth Sunday, a sunstroke laid him low. On the
Monday, however, he got up — to bury another fellow-labourer, his
schoolmaster's wife. On the Tuesday he was again struck down,
never spoke again, and fell asleep early on the Wednesday morn-
ing, May 4th. A young Negro lad in the Christian Institution
wrote home to the Society, " Dear Sir, do send us more mission-
aries like Mr. Brooks, men who count all things but loss for Jesus
Christ's sake."
It was within the following three weeks that the veteran
Nyliinder was taken, after nineteen years' unbroken service. Of
him we will not now speak ; but let us briefly notice the two
young daughters he left behind.
In Edward Bickersteth's journal of his visit to Africa in 1816,
occurs the following entry, under date May 5th : —
" I preached from Matt, xxviii. 19, 'Baptizing them in the name of
the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Gliost,' after which I had
the pleasure of baptizing Mr. Nyliinder's two children, Catherine* and
Anne Elizabeth. The negro school-children seemed much interested,
and I was glad ui the opportunity of talking to them about tlie
ordinance."
This was on the Bullom Shore, opposite Sierra Leone, where
Nyliinder was then stationed; and it was the first baptism in tiiat
country, in which now for many years the Sierra Leone Church
* Sic ill journal ; but afterwards she appears as Hannah.
N 2
i8o
The Finished Course
Part III,
1812-24.
Chap. 14.
And
grand-
daughter.
has maintained its own Mission, and admitted hundreds of
members into the visible Body of Christ.
The two little girls, entirely orphaned by their father's death
at the ages of thirteen and eleven, were sent to England for
education ; and after six years at the famous Clergy Daughters'
School near Kirkby Lonsdale, they were engaged by the Society to
be teachers in the land of their birth. When the Committee took
leave of them, in 1831, Bickersteth affectionately addressed the
young sisters whom he had baptized fifteen years before, and
whose names stand Nos. 10 and 11 on the C.M.S. roll of women
missionaries. Young as they were, they proved excellent school
mistresses ; and a few years later, both w^ere married : Anne
Elizabeth to the Eev. J. F. Schon, the eminent linguistic student
and missionary, and her sister Hannah to the Eev. Edward
Jones, the coloured clergyman of the American Church who was
so long Principal of Fourah Bay College.
But they also soon finished their course. Each died in turn at
the age of twenty-five. Each left a little daughter. Hannah's
child soon followed her to the better land. Anne Ehzabeth's
child still, by God's mercy, survives, and is honoured by
missionaries and travellers innumerable who have enjoyed the
simple hospitality of her mission bungalow, as Mrs. Higgens of
Colombo.
When James Frederick Schon was mourning the loss of his
beloved young wife Anne EHzabeth, one of the African Christians
said to him, " Massa, the time when trouble catch me, me go to
you : you speak to us of Jesus and the Eesurrection, and that
make our hearts glad. Massa, can this now no comfort you ?
Your wife no lost, your child no lost. They that believe in Jesus
never die."
Kissey Churchyard, in which lie the mortal remains of many of
these brethren and sisters, is a familiar name to older members
of the Church Missionary Society. Often were the tombstones
in it referred to at missionary meetings in former years. And no
wonder ; for touching indeed are these memorials of the dead —
or rather, of those "not dead but gone before." Many of them
belong to a later period than this chapter has to do with ; yet let
them be just noticed here. Side by side lie those heroes and
heroines of the cross. " TJiere," says the book that has inspired
this chapter, " lies the veteran missionary, worn out by years of
toil ; and tJiere, the young brother, struck down in the prime of
his youth, and the height of his usefulness. There sleeps the
young wife, who rejoiced that she was counted worthy to die for
the name of the Lord ; and there the little children, early blighted
by that deadly climate, — like the babes of Bethlehem, ' uncon-
scious martyrs in the cause of their Eedeemer.' " What the
touching Service for the " Churching of Women " calls " the
great pain and peril of child-birth " is conspicuouslj^ illustrated
by the inscriptions on the graves at Kissey. Here lies Augusta
The Finished Course i8i
Kissling [)Ue Tanner), the young wife of the excellent Basle Part III.
missionary to the Gold Coast who, after five years there, joined iP^^""^'
the C.M.S., man-ied, and went to Sierra Leone, and who in after ^_f^ '
years rendered valuable service in New Zealand. Many hopes
clustered round Augusta Tanner. Her Lord had given her
natural talents, which a good education had developed. When
she was fifteen, God brought her to Himself. At the age of
nineteen He called her to West Africa. For more than a year
she enjoyed good health, and began zealously to work among
the women and girls. Then her babe was born, and died ; and,
an hour after, the mother yielded up her beautiful spirit to the
Lord. Near her grave is that of Mrs. Graf and her infant. She
landed with her husband one December ; on March 14th she was
laid to rest in Kissey Churchyard. Hard by, again, is the grave of
Mrs. Schlenker and her infant. She lived in Sierra Leone just
six months. And the graves of two wives of David Schmid, both
Germans ; the first of whom landed in January and died in July,
and the second landed in January and died in March.
But Kissey Churchyard is not the only spot thus sacred. The
cemetery of Freetown contains many like early graves ; and not a
few are found in other outlying villages. It was not, however, in
all cases the wife that was taken so soon. One grave at Kissey,
for instance, bears this inscription, " Our dear and blessed
Conrad's resting-place." " Conrad " was another Basle man
ordained in England, the Kev. John Conrad Clemens. To his
wife, also, a little babe was given, and immediately taken away
again ; but she recovered, nursed her dying husband, and then
nobly laboured on ■ in iVfrica, as a widow, for nineteen years.
Sabina Peter von Ella, of Straslnu-g, deserves, as Mrs. Clemens,
an honoured place among the heroines of Sierra Leone.
Some have reproached the Missionary Societies for sending out
young women to die, and have suggested that their children
" have no right to exist." Let such critics read Dr. Gust's Dr. Cust
address on Missionary Heroes in Africa, in w^hich he speaks death's of
so sympathetically of " many a gentle woman's grave, for women J^g"^"^.'"
have never been found wanting to share the honour and the sion -field,
danger of the Cross," and uses these noble words: — "Some are
selected to live and work ; to others is conceded the peculiar
grace to die nol)ly, and set a glorious example. Deaths arc
required as well as Lives to complete the picture of the New^ Life.
Some may follow the steps of our Lord in a life of beneficence
and mercy ; to others is granted the sweeter lot of filling up that
which is behind of His sufferings. And in the last struggle, how
by grace they have been sustained, doing nothing common or
mean in the last memorable scene of their earthly passion but
sealing their faith by their manner of meeting death."
CHAPTER XV.
India : The Opened Door ; the Entering In.
C.M.S. Work begun before the Opening — The Calcutta Corresponding
Committee — Corrie and Abdul Masih — The First Missionaries —
The Bishopric of Calcutta — Bishop Middleton — Bishop's College — •
Bishop Heber — Burdwan and its Schools — Miss Cooke's Girls'
School — Benares, Agra, Meerut — The Sepoy Convert — Madras and
Tinnevelly — Hough and Rhenius.
" Open ye the gates, that the righteous .
enter in." — Isa. xxvi. 2.
Part III.
1812-24.
Chap. 15.
Work in
India
before the
door
opened.
Corrie
and Abdul
Masih.
. which keepi-th the truih may
OW, through the Divine blessing upon the strenuous
exertions of Buchanan and Wilberforce and Pratt and
their aUies, the door of India was opened for the
Gospel, we have already seen in our Ninth Chapter.
We must now see how the Christians of England
availed themselves of the great opportunity.
But the Church Missionary Society had begun work in India
before that year 1813. A Corresponding Committee, comprising
three of the famous "five chaplains," David Brown, Buchanan,
and Henry Marty n, and also George Udny, had been formed at
Calcutta in 1807, and money had been granted to them, first for
translations of the Scriptures, and then for the employment of
Native Christians as " readers." The Society's vote of money for
readers was noticed in the House of Commons by a hostile
member, but Grant succeeded in quieting him.
Subsequently, Martyn and Buchanan having left India, and
David Brown dying in 1812, the other two of the " five chaplains,"
Daniel Corrie and Thomas Thomason, were the leading spirits ;
and it was under Corrie' s auspices that the first and most
celebrated of these readers was set to work. This was Abdul
Masih, originally Sheikh Salih, a zealous Delhi Mohammedan,
and a man of some rank, having been master of the jewels at the
Court of Oudh. He had been led to seek Christ through hearing
Henry Martyn explaining the Ten Commandments to a crowd of
natives at Cawnpore. He engaged himself as a copyist under
Sabat, Martyn's assistant in translating the New Testament into
Hindustani, and as he copied the translated chapters, the entrance
of God's Word gave light ; and the result was that he asked for
India : The Opened Door ; the Entering In 183
baptism. After Martyn left India, on Whit Sunday, 1811, he was pabt III.
baptized by David Brown in the Old Church, Calcutta, by the 1812-24.
name of Abdul Masih (Servant of Christ). Corrie, on being Chap^l5.
appointed chaplain at Agra, took him there with him, engaging
him as a reader in the name of the Church Missionary Society.
He was thus the first C.M.S. agent in India ; and it is a coinci-
dence worth noting that Corrie' s diary of the boat journey with
him up the Ganges was one of the communications read at the
first Committee meeting held in the new office in Salisbury Square,
on Deceml)er 13th, 1813. A rich blessing was vouchsafed to the
Indian evangelist's work, and during Corrie's sixteen months at
Agra over fifty adults, Hindus and Mohammedans, were baptized.
So commenced the career of the man who was afterwards ordained
by Bishop Heber. Let it never be forgotten that the first Native
clergyman of the Church of England in India w^as a convert from
Mohammedanism. Thomason had a portrait of him painted, and
sent it home to Simeon in 1814. Simeon sent it to the Church
Missionary House, and there it hangs to this day. A letter of Abdul
Masih's to the Committee, a translation of which is printed in the
Report of 1818, is singularly touching. " 0 friends of my soul," he
says, " I who am the least of the servants of the Chm-ch of Hindoo-
stan, give praise to the Lord Jesus, the Messiah, having found
favour of you all." He gives an account of his work, and particu-
larly of two ex-Moslems who had apostatized, expressing gladness
that the "wolves in sheep's clothing" had thrown off their dis-
guise. He sends " salaams " from forty-two men and women and
their childi-en ; and concludes, — " May this Letter of Abdul Masih
written January 1, 1816, from his residence Akbarabad [i.e. Agra,
the city of Akbar], arrive in London at the Church Missionary
House, in the presence of the Reverend Josiah Pratt ! "
Abdul Masih's journals came home regularly, and proved quite ^^^^^^'f^^
the ])iece de resistance, sometimes for months together, in the new ^°
Missionary Begister ; and they excited the deepest interest among
the Society's friends throughout the country. It is interesting to
notice that he was, in a humble sense, the first C.M.S. medical
missionary. It was reported that in two months he had treated
one hundred cases, had spent a large part of his stipend in
the purchase of medicines, and was known far and wide as the
Christian hakim. His journals greatly encouraged the Committee.
As yet there was no fruit to speak of in West Africa, whither all
the missionaries (save the two "lay settlers" for New Zealand)
had hitherto been sent ; and here, before a single man had been
sent to India, and at the very time that Wilberforce was fighting
in Parliament for Uberty to send them, the Lord was already
gathering out His elect, using two instruments which have every-
where and at all times, down to the present day in Uganda, been
more blessed than any other, the Native Evangelist and the
Written Word. The Committee saw in it a confirmation of " that
first principle of all missionary exertions, an entire confidence in
184 India: The Opened Door; the Entering In
Part III. God, in the prudent use of all opportunities as they may present
1812-24. themselves."-''
Chap. 15.
But before the news began to arrive that so cheered the
Committee— indeed within a month of that first journal of Corrie's
being read, — the great Valedictory Dismissal had been held,
noticed in a previous chapter,! to take leave of the first four
missionaries for India, Ehenius, Schnarre, Greenwood, and Norton.
Buchanan's written address on the occasion is a masterpiece of
wise counsel, dictated by his own experience in India, and based
upon our Lord's charge to the Twelve in St. Matthew. J It is
notable for its plain statement that a missionary's life in India is
not (ordinarily) one of peril or privation, and for the warning that
one of the chief temptations would be to indolence and ease in the
enjoyment of "new modes of comfort"; notable also for its
earnest exhortation not to send home coloured and (unintention-
ally) misleading reports. Let one short passage be quoted : —
"Beware, especially, of giving too favourable an account of your
ability to preach in the native languages, and of the effects of your
preaching on the hearers. For instance, after you have made some
progress in a particular language, and have committed to memory a few
theological phrases, you will, perhaps, try to converse with the Natives
on religious suhjects. But, in your account of such a conversation in this
stage of your study, do not call it preachinxj Christ to the people. For it
may he that the people scarcely understood a single doctrine of your
address, and that, when they asked you a question, you could not
understand or answer them. "To preach Christ implies the preaching of
Him fully, and to the understanding of tlie people ; and that people are
placed under a heavy responsihility who reject the message. In your
written accounts, therefore, he just to yourselves, be just to the people,
and be just to Christ's doctrine."
Among other striking features of the address are his illustrations
of the use to be made of the descriptions of idolatry in Isaiah
and other prophets, in Meu of mere abuse of the idols, and his
reference _ to the unique Chaldaic verse embedded in the Hebrew
of Jeremiah's prophecy, chap. x. 11, "Thus shall ye say unto
them. The gods that have not made the heavens and the earth, even
they shall p)crish from the earth, and from under these heavens."
I' Just as if," says Buchanan, " while you are receiving instructions
in your own tongue, one sentence should be given you in the
Tamul or Cinghalese language w^hich you should deliver to the
Hindoos." § This great charge-— which a friend in India (not
named) urged the Committee to adopt as a standing charge for
all Indian missionaries — was Buchanan's last w-ork. He died
February 9th, 1815 ; and Pratt wrote, in well-chosen w^ords,
"In his character were united remarkable simphcity, great com-
* Eeport, 1815, p. 567. f See p. 113.
X It is printed in the Appendix to the Report of 1814.
§ He names Tamil and Singhalese becaase two of the men were going to
Madras, and two to Ceylon — though the two latter did actually go to India,
India : The Opened Door ; the Entering In 185
prehension and grasp of mind, with the warmth and glow of Part III.
genius ; and tliese quahties were all sanctified by Divine grace, 1812-24.
and directed to the promotion of Christ's Kingdom among men, Cnap^lo.
with a boldness and fortitude, under difficult circumstances, the
success of which will endear his memory to generations yet
unborn."
The East India Company, loyally accepting the decision of
Parliament, gave Ehenius and Schnarre, before the Act actually
came into force, passages to India and licenses to reside there,
the Society guaranteeing their character and good behaviour. (At
a subsequent period the Committee had to promise to recall any
missionary with whom the Government might be dissatisfied ; and
to require each man to give a bond for £450, to secure his return
if summoned.) At Madras they were received by another of the
godly chaplains to whom India owes so much, Marmaduke
Thompson, who was just then forming there a Corresponding
Committee for South India. The venerable Dr. John, who had
for many years been at the head of the Danish Mission at
Tranquebar, being just dead, and the S.P.C.K. having no one to
send in his place, the two C.M.S. men were directed by the
Corresponding Committee to go and take charge for a time ; and
although soon afterwards they were recalled to Madras for work
in the city, other C.M.S. missionaries were sent to Tranquebar,
and this arrangement continued for some years. In passing it
may be noticed that the first Native teacher engaged under these
two owed his conversion to his recovery from sickness through
the use of medicines dispensed by them — another foreshadowing
of the Medical Missions of the future. Norton and Greenwood, More men,
and a new Lutheran clergyman of great ability and learning,
Christopher Gottbold Schroter, followed in 1815 ; Benjamin
Bailey and Thomas Dawson in 1816 ; and the brothers Schmid,
Barenbruck (the last of the Berlin men), Adlington, Henry Baker,
and Joseph Fenn, in 1817.
This was not a very eager response by Christian England to tbi; But very
new openings which God's Providence had given to its zeal and ^^'
energy. Nor had other Societies a worthier reinforcement. The
S.P.C.K. sent one Lutheran out in 1813, and no more till 1818.
The London Missionary Society began to extend in the South,
followed a year or two later by the Wesleyans ; and the Baptists
advanced from Serampore into the North-West ; hvX the progress,
even in staff and machinery, was very slow. There was also the
little beginning of the American Congregationalists at Bombay,
already referred to. That was all.
In the meanwhile, the Home Government had fulfilled one
purpose of the Act of 1813, by appointing a Bishop of Calcutta. The first
Their choice fell upon Dr. T. F. Middleton, Archdeacon of Hun- cakut^ta.'
tingdon, Vicar of St. Pancras, and author of a valuable treatise,
not on the Greek x\rticle pure and simple, after the fashion of the
dry-as-dust divines known as the " Greek-play bishops," but on
1 86 India: The Opened Door; the Entering In
^iHV^-ii' *^^ Doctrine of the Greek Article applied to the Criticism and
Chap. 15 ^^^'^''^^'rO'tion of the Neio Testament, which really was designed to
.'— _ ' refute Socinian interpretations of certain important passages
of Scj-ipture bearing on the Deity of the Son and the Holy
Ghost. Middleton was a strong High Churchman, and, as Dr.
Overton puts it, " figuratively speaking he hailed from Clapton,
not from Clapham." ■-' It is worth noting, however, as indicating
the views concerning Continental Protestantism then prevailing
among good men of his type, that in dehvering an admirable
charge to Mr. Jacobi, the Lutheran missionary sent to India in
1813 by the S.P.C.K., he said, " We regard you as invested with
the functions of an apostle " ; while Jacobi in his reply, which is
printed, without correction or comment, in the volume of Bishop
Middleton's Sermons and Charges, observed that he was "very
happy to understand that the Church of England considers the
Luthei-an Church as a faithful sister."
The opinion is a common one that the Evangelicals would
necessarily be disappointed at the choice of Middleton for a
bishopric the establishment of which was so largely due to their
energy ; but no evidence of this is produced, and it would seem
more probable that, accustomed as they were to work as a despised
minority, and strangers as they were to ecclesiastical honours, the
appointment would appear to them quite natural, and w^ould be
taken as a matter of course. Pratt, at all events, knew that an
able and vigorous man was being sent, as he resided in St. Pancras,
and had supported Middleton in large schemes of Church extension
which some of the parishioners had bitterly opposed.! The
greater part of Middleton's charge to Jacobi is printed in the
Missionary Begister of January, 1814 ; and the very next number
opens w4th this announcement : —
Bishop fob India.
Archdeacon Middleton, whose Address to Mr. Jacobi we
noticed in our last Number, has been appointed the new
Bishop for India — the most important charge with
which any English Clergyman ever left his native shores !
U)^offe"nd ^^ India got its first Bishop ; but for fear of offending the
India. Natives — very few indeed of whom can have known or cared any-
thing about it — he was consecrated privately in Lambeth Palace
Chapel (May 8th, 1814), and the Dean of Winchester's sermon
on the occasion was not allowed to be printed. The Missionary
Begister, however, printed the Bishop of Chester's valedictory
address at the S.P.C.K. House, and Middleton's reply. How
Bishop Law viewed the matter may be judged from these words :
" The establishment of Episcopacy will most effectually check
* See p. 39.
t Mr. Hole suggests that the great Parliamentary grant of one million
sterling for building churches in 1818 was indirectly a result of Middleton's
work at St. Pancras.
India: The Opened Door; the Entering In 187
every erroneous doctrine, stop the wild progress of enthusiasm, Part III.
and spread the kno^Yledge of uncorrupted Christianity." cha^i*'
In due course Bishop Middleton landed in India. Sir John °^^"
Kaye quaintly says : * —
" There was no commotion, no excitement. Offended Hinduism did But India
not rise up in arms, nor indignant Mohammedanism raise a war cry of '^^'"^'^ "°*-
death to the infidel. English gentlemen asked each other at the dinnei--
table if they had seen the Bishop ; but the heart of Hinduism beat
calmly, as was its wont. The Bishop preached in the Christian temple
on the Clu'istian's hara din ; and that night the Europeans in Calcutta slept
soundly in their beds. There was not a massacre ; there was not a rebellion.
The merchant took his place at the desk ; the public servant entered his
office ; and the native underlings salaamed meekly and reverentially as
ever. Everj^thing went on as usual, in spite of the Bishop, and his lawn
sleeves, and his sermon on Christmas Day. It really seemed probable,
after all, that British dominion in the East would survive the blow."
It was the same when he took his journeys. Brahman priests
whose lands did not yield them enough revenue welcomed the
Lord Padre Sahib, thinking that he would look on them as
brothers and squeeze grants for them out of the Government
purse ; others asked him for a little money towards the repair of
their temples ; and the Bishop, instead of finding them either
terror-stricken at his approach on the one hand, or ready to be
converted on the other, found that a few rupees judiciously
distributed were his best passport.
Middleton became a good and hard-working bishop in some Bishop
ways, though his life was much embittered by disputes with the andC.M°s.
Government about his jurisdiction over the military chaplains, by
frequent struggles on points of etiquette and precedence, and by
the pretensions of the principal Presbyterian chaplain, Dr. Bryce,
a combative man, to be quite as good as any bishop. But the
Church Missionary Society had to suffer great disappointment on
account of two of his decisions. He declined either to license
the missionaries or to ordain Natives. He has often been blamed
for these refusals ; but both were due to an honest belief that his
commission from the State gave him no authority to do either.
The result, however, was (1) that Abdul Masih, for whose ordina-
tion the Society had fondly hoped, had to wait until Middleton
had been succeeded by Heber ; and (2) that the missionaries, not
being licensed, were precluded from ministering even occasionally
to English congregations. This question perplexed and troubled the
Bishop not a little. He was not happy about the presence in his
diocese of clergymen without his license. " I must either license
them," he said, " or silence them." He conscientiously declined
to do the first, and he found himself unable to do the second.
Nevertheless, the Committee determined that nothing on their
part should prevent such co-operation with the Bishop as they
were permitted to render. "When he formed his great plan for
* Christianitij in India, p. 290.
1 88 India : The Opened Door ; the Entering In
Part III. the establishment of Bishop's College, proposing to apply to it
Cha^lt *^'^* ^^^°^ °^ £5000 which first extended the operations of the
lap^. . g p Q ^Q India,* and when the S.P.C.K. thereupon voted a like
c.M.s. sum, the Committee resolved not to be behind the older Societies,
%t^?^ ^^^^ proceeded to vote £5000 too out of the Society's General
Fund — one-sixth of its Income for the year — for the same purpose ;
and Pratt wrote in the Bccjistcr, "Wo heartily rejoice in the
co-operation of these three Societies in this great object, and trust
that this co-operation will tend to cherish a kind and friendly spirit
among their Members, both in their proceedings at home and in
their exertions among the Heathen. "f The following Minute was
passed at the Committee meeting of July 12th, 1819 : —
" Re.solve(I — Tliat this Society cannot behold without a high degree of
gratitude the general interest at this time manifesting itself, through
every part of the Kingdom, in favour of the Veneral)le Society for the
Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts ; and contemplates with
peculiar pleasure the zeal and readiness with which it has adopted the
important Plan suggested l)y the Lord Bishop of Calcutta for establishing
a Mission College near Calcutta, and the jiromptitude with which the
Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge has agreed to support the
said Plan ; and that this Society, desirous of co-operating in the same
great and conunon Cause, do now make a like Grant of £-")000 for the
same purpose; and that its Corresponding Committee at Calcutta l)e
empowered to express to his Lordship its respectful acknowledgments
of the enlarged views which he has so eminently displayed in his plans
for promoting the Conversion of the Native Population of India ; and to
request that he will be pleased to accept the sum hereby voted, to be
paid by the Society's Corresponding Committee, in such manner and at
such times as his Lordship may wish."
Not content with this conspicuous token of their eager desire to
support the Bishop, the Committee in the following year voted
£1000 towards the maintenance of the College, and repeated the
vote in the two succeeding years ; but Middleton had just scruples
about drawing this money, as the College statutes provided that
students would be at the disposal of S.P.G. The grants were,
however, duly paid ; but the Committee had some little difficulty
in justifying them to some of their supporters, and in 1826 they
issued an elaborate memorandum on the subject. Eventually
better arrangements were made for receiving C.M.S. students;
but little use was ever made of this privilege.
Coikge'.^ In due course a fine building was erected on the bank of the
Hooghly, three or four miles below Calcutta ; and the Bishop
threw his whole heart into the development of the scheme. A
Fellow of Trinity, Cambridge, Dr. Mill, went out as Principal, and
high hopes were entertained of the usefulness of the new Univer-
sity of the East, as Middleton loved to call it. But for reasons
which have never been clearly understood, or at all events never
* See p. 148.
t The Bible Society, subsequently, also voted £5000, of course specifically
for Bible translations.
India: The Opened Door; the Entering In 189
clearly explained, the College did not prove a success. For one Part III.
thing, it was certainly premature. It was for the high classical J^J^'^t
and theological education of the Native Christians ; but there were J_
not then, nor were there for long years after, a sufficient number
of suitable converts belonging to the Church of England. Ulti-
mately, after a struggle lasting half a century, the buildings were
sold to Government. The institution, on a more modest scale, is
now carried on in the heart of the city by the Oxford Mission.
As time went on, Bishop Middleton learned to value the
missionaries, and began to desire a closer connexion with them.
But in the midst of hopeful negotiations with the Society, which
gave Pratt great satisfaction, the Bishop died, on July 11th, Death m^^^
1822, after a few days' illness, brought on, no doubt, by the fatigue
involved in his immense journeys. The Diocese of Calcutta com-
prised all India, and Ceylon, and Australia .'—but no Indian
bishop ever attempted to reach that ultima TJude of his jurisdic-
tion. Even within India proper, the travelling, in pre-railway
days, was wearying and wearing in the extreme ; and Middleton's
three successors all fell victims to its exhaustion. Indeed the
Diocese of Calcutta enjoys the unique honour of having had seven
bishops in succession, not one of whom came home to die. The
eighth was spared to retire after twenty years' work ; but all his
predecessors fell at their post. There is no other foreign diocese
in the world with a similar record.
Middleton's immediate successor was Eeginald Heber, Eector g^^fina''*
of Hodnet, Shropshire, a brilliant scholar and Quarterly Reviewer,
a true poet, a devoted parish clergyman ; a fascinating personality
altogether, loved and admired by all who knew him.=:^ " No man,"
wrote young Lord Ashley (afterwards the great Earl of Shaftes-
. bury) in 1826, " ever equalled Bishop Heber. His talents were of
the most exquisite character. If he were not a Socrates, able to
knock down by force of reasoning the most stubborn opposers, he
was like Orpheus, who led even stones and trees by the enchant-
ment of his music." i His appointment was hailed with joy by
the Evangelicals. Not that he was one of their own body. Indeed
he has been sometimes claimed as a High Churchman. He was
really in the best sense a moderate man, and singularly free from
party prejudice of any kind. In a letter to a young clergyman
advising him to "avoid singularities," he specifies "the High
Churchman who snuffles in a pompous tone through his nose, and
the Evangelical minister who preaches extempore." He wrote
occasionally for the Christian Observer, but he objected to prayer-
meetings. Perceiving the great influence of hymns among the
Dissenters, he compiled a hymn-book for Church use, appropriate Hin^^^
to the Church seasons ; but as neither the Archbishop of Canter-
bury nor the Bishop of London would authorize its use, he
* See Dr. G. Smith's delightful biography (Murray, 1895).
f Life of Lord Shafteshuvy, vol. i. p. 102.
IQO India : The Opened Door ; the Entering In
Part III. refrained from publishing it."* His own hymns, especially " Holy,
1812-24. holy, holy, Lord God Almighty " and " The Son of God goes forth
^^' ' to war," have of themselves immortalized his name; and still
more, the greatest of missionary hymns, " From Greenland's icy
mountains." f But Heber besides being an exemplary parish
clergyman, was a thorough believer in Missions. He was a warm
supporter, not only of the S.P.G. and S.P.C.K., but also of the
C.M.S. and the Bible Society. :f For the Bible Society, indeed, his
first missionary sermon was preached at Shrewsbury in 1813. A
sermon for the C.M.S. , at Whittington in 1820, on the words,
" Thy Kingdom come," is a singularly earnest and impressive
appeal. " When you are about to lie down this night," he said
to the congregation, " and begin, in the words which the Lord has
taught you, to commend your bodies and souls to His protection,
will you not blush, will you not tremble to think, while you say
to God, ' Thy Kingdom come ! ' that you have this day refused
your contributions towards the extension of that Kingdom ? I
know you will not refuse them ! ' '
Heber and Heber was consecratcd on June 1st, 1823 ; and on the 9th he
^•^•^- attended a meeting of the C.M.S. Committee, and assured them
that he " entirely approved the principles on which the Society's
Missions in the East were conducted, and was going out with the
most cordial disposition to render them every assistance in liis
power." His policy was quite different from Middleton's. He
avoided friction w'ith the civil authorities ; he made friends with-
the Baptist and Congregationalist missionaries ; he put the evan-
gelization of the Heathen in the forefront of the Church's duty in
India. He took a different view of his powers and responsibilities
from that taken by his predecessor, and on arriving in India, he
* Some of these particulars are from Overton's English Church in the
Nineteen th Century.
t On Whit Sunday, 1819, Dr. Shipley, Dean of St. Asaph and Vicar of
Wrexham, preached a sermon in Wrexham Church in aid of the S.P.G. That
day was also fixed upon for the commencement of the Sunday Evening
Lectures intended to be established in that church — an important event in
the parish at a time when Evening Services were still few and far between.
Reginald Heber, then Rector of Hodnet, the Dean's son-in-law, undertook to
deliver the first lecture. In the course of the Saturday previous, the Dean
and his son-in-law being together at the Vicarage, the former requested
Heber to write " something for them to sing in the morning," and he
retired for that purpose from the table, where the Dean and a few friends
were sitting, to a distant part of the room. In a short time the Dean
inquired, "What have you written?" Heber, having then composed the
three first verses, read them over. " There, there, that will do very well,"
said the Dean. "No, no, the sense is not complete," replied Heber.
Accordingly he added the fourth verse, and the Dean being inexorable to
his repeated request of " Let me add another, oh, let me add another," thus
completed the hymn, which has i^ince become so colpbi'atcd. It was sung
the next morning in Wrexham Church, for the first time. A facsimile of
Heber's original MS. appeared in the CM. QJeaner of April, 1882.
X Heber's project of uniting the C.M.S. with the S.P.G. has been
already mentioned, p. 151.
India: The Opened Door; the Entering In 191
at once arranged to give episcopal licenses to the missionaries.''' Part III.
He also expressed his readiness to receive Natives of India as 1812-24.
candidates for ordination — a short Act of Parliament being passed ^P"
on purpose to confirm his authority to do so ; and, as before
intimated, he admitted Abdul Masih — who had already received
Lutheran orders upon Middleton's refusal to ordain him — to the
ministry of the Church of England, by conferring Anglican
orders upon him on November 30th, 1825. t He further greatly
pleased the Evangelical leaders by appointing Daniel Corrie
Archdeacon of Calcutta. Corrie indeed had been a persona grata
with Bishop Middleton, who had spoken of him in the warmest
terms.
Let us now take a brief survey of the Society's Missions in Survey
India as they had been developed during Middleton's Episcopate, Missions,
and as they appeared when Heber landed at Calcutta.
In the ten years, 1814 to 1823, the Society had sent to India
twenty-six men : fourteen to the North, eleven to the South, and
one to Bomljay. Thirteen were English clergymen, and eleven
were Germans in Lutheran orders ; the remaining two were a
schoolmaster and a printer. There was also an able and devoted
Eurasian, William Bowley, who had received Lutheran orders in
India. Three had died, and one had returned invalided. Eleven
stations had been occupied by European missionaries, and at
several other places there were native catechists and schools
supported by the Society, but supervised by Company's chaplains.
The work was entirely administered by the Corresponding Com- The Cone-
mittees at Calcutta, Madras, and Bombay ; the Society voting co'm^'"^
them large grants of money year by year, and leaving to them its mittees.
distribution, and (in most cases) the location of missionaries — ■
even the transfer of a man from Madras to Calcutta, or vice versa.
No other system was possible at a time when a letter took five
months to go or come, — for instance, the death of Bishop Middleton,
on July 11th, was not known in England till December. And
the Corresponding Committees consisted of Company's chaplains
and ofificials who were devoted to the Society's spiritual principles
and fitted by long experience in India to devise and carry out
* Dr. Overton (English Church in the Nineteenth Century, p. 276) eays
that Heber " very properly insisted that the missionaries sent out by the
C.M.S. should lie as much under his jurisdiction as those sent out by other
Church Societies, and he succeeded in carrying his point, though the rule was
not formally recognized by the Society." This is the one single instance in
which 1 find Dr. Overton inaccurate. (1) As regards episcopal licenses, the
Society had begged for them from Bishop Middleton, and rejoiced when
Heber gave them. (2) There were no English missionaries of other Church
Societies when Heber went out, except the professors in Bishop's College,
belongino: to the S.P.G. Three young S.P.G. men arrived during Hebcr's
short episcopate. In the South, all the S.P.C.K. men were Germans in
Luthornn orders.
t This, as before stated, was the first Anglican ordination of a Native of
India. But Heber had already ordained, in India, a Xative of Ceylon,
a student at Bishop's College, named Christian David.
192 India : The Opened Door ; the Entering in
Part III. good plans. At Calcutta, Thomason was Hon. Secretary ; at
1812-24. Madras, Marmaduke Thompson ; at Bombay, Thomas Carr (after-
Chap. 15. •,^yap(;^g gi^.g|; Blsliop of Bombay). The Treasurer at Madras was
J. M. Strachan, in after years perhaps the most influential layman
in the counsels of Salisbury Square. George Udny, who had been
one of the original promoters of missionary work in Bengal twenty
years before,''' was still a member of the Calcutta Committee.
But the Committee at home then contained scarcely anyone, save
Charles Grant, wdio knew India personally. The position is
almost entirely reversed at the present day. On the one hand,
there are very few chaplains in India of the type of Corrie and
Thomason. On the other hand, Anglo-Indian officials are an
important element in the Home Committee, and so are retired
missionaries ; and both classes add to their past local experience
the larger experience gained in the Committee itself of Missions
all round the world. Add again to this a mail communication in
less than a fortnight, and the electric telegraph, and we can realize
the immense change that time has wrought. Whether the con-
sequent tendency to centralization may not go too far is a further
question, not to be discussed here.
Ecciesias- Difficulties, however, arose between some of the missionaries — •
cuUies'.'^" particularly some of the Lutherans — and the Corresponding Com-
mittees ; the former objecting to being controlled by the latter.
The Home Committee had to interpose ; and in 1818 they laid
down important rules on the subject. The missionaries were
bidden to recognize the full authority of the Corresponding Com-
mittees in " external affairs," which were defined as comprising
" the fixing of stations, the locations and transference of mission-
aries, reception or dismissal of catechists and other assistants,
the regulation of salaries, the undertaking and the general
planning of buildings, &c." In "internal affairs," which were
defined as " the spiritual power and authority for the due exercise
of which a missionary was responsible to the ecclesiastical rulers
of the Church he belonged to," the missionaries were to be
directed by " the Bishop or other regular Ecclesiastical Power."
The Society " assumed no control over the conscience of a
missionary in the discharge of his spiritual functions," but " it
would ever exercise the right of retaining or dismissing him,
according as it might approve or disapprove his views, temper,
or condiict." Counsel's opinion, however, which was obtained
at this time, affirmed that the Bishop had absolute power over
locations — that is, of English clergymen. He had no authority
over laymen ; nor over Lutheran ministers — so where was the
"Ecclesiastical Power" that was to control the very persons
with whom the difficulties arose? The Committee, however,
gave positive instructions that Anglican forms of worship were
to be used in all the Society's Missions, and at the same time
* See p. 54.
India: The Opened Door; the Entering In 193
passed a resolution to receive no Lutheran candidate who was Part III.
unwilhng to promise this. 1812-24.
In regard to funds, the Corresponding Committees undertook P"
large responsibilities. They did much more than administer Liberal
grants from England. They boldly set forth the principle that \°^^^^^'
for the evangelization of India the English in India were pri- India,
marily responsible, and they treated the Society's grants as
virtually grants-in-aid to Missions locally supported and worked.
For missionaries they might have to look to England ; but for
money they looked primarily to India — certainly for the money
for buildings, the maintenance of schools, and the payment of
Native agents. This system was originated at Calcutta, in 1817,
by a sermon preached by Corrie at the Old Church, in which,
having just returned from England, he told the Anglo-Indians
how, in his own father's parish at home, the poor were denying
themselves to send the Gospel to the Heathen. "When," said
he, " shall we begin to see British Christians in India do the
same '? " No less than £300 was collected after that sermon.
Thomason wrote : — " This was in every respect an interesting
occasion. Never before had a Discourse been delivered, pro-
fessedly with a Missionary object, from a pulpit of the Established
Cluirch in India. It is my full intention to keep up the practice,
if it please God to spare my life." And the success of the plan
was remarkable. For instance, in 1823, while the Calcutta Com-
mittee drew bills on the Society at home for £7387, they raised
in Bengal just £4000 ; and while the Madras Committee drew
on the Society for £3390, they raised on the spot just £2000. In
fact, the number of godly officers and civilians in India had
largely inci'eased, under the influence of the many devoted men
for wliom Simeon, through Charles Grant, had obtained chaplains'
appointments ; and their scale of giving was much liigher than
prevailed, or ever has prevailed, in England. When we are
told, as we so often are told, that Anglo-Indians do not believe in
Missions, the answer is that they are the most liberal supporters
of the very Missions their eyes have seen, most of which were
actually started at their instance and at their expense. That is
to say, the truly Christian men among them ; and who else are
competent judges?
Glancing now at the C.M.S. Missions as they appeared in 1823,
we find that the Corresponding Committees had from the first
set before them three ntetJiods of missionary work for adoption,
viz., the (1) Press, (2) Schools, and (3) what they called Missionary
Establishments, i.e. stations with ordained missionaries. The
employment of Native Christian "readers" like Abdul Masih
was apparently included under the first head, as they were to
"read" to their countrymen the Scriptures, tracts, &c., which J^f^^at
ii -r^ -I T 1 r ■ • ill! Calcutta.
the Press produced ; but 01 course, as " missionary establish-
ments " multiplied, these " readers " developed into " catechists "
under the ordained missionary. All three methods were being
VOL. I. o
194 India: The Opened Door; the Entering In
Part III. worked at Calcutta. The Mission (after a temporary location at
1812-2-i. Garden Eeach, south of the city) had secured a valuable piece of
Chap. 15. gj.Q^^j-,(;^ -y^ \^Q heart of that part of the native quarter known as
Mirzapore,"- using for its purchase a gift of Es. 30,000 from Major
Phipps. At that time the Society had a plan for establishing
in all its Missions what w^ere called " Christian Institutions,"
by which was meant a seminary for the preparation of Native
teachers, with mission-house, church, printing-office, &c., all in
one compound. The purchase at Mirzapore was with this object ;
and it has been an important centre of work, more or less on
those lines, from that day to this. A church. Trinity Church,
was built, and opened in 1826. A printing establishment was
started under a man named Brown, who had been sent out for
the purpose, after serving for some years in the printing-ofilice
employed by the Society in London.! He was really in his own
province an excellent missionary, and died at his post in 1824.
Presses and founts of type, English, Arabic, and Persian, were
sent out by the Society ; the Nagri or Sanscrit character types
being obtained in India. Portions of Scripture, prayer-books,
catechisms, primers, hymn-books, tracts, simple expositions,
were produced in large numbers ; and it is interesting to see
in one of the lists " 500 Hints on Prayer for the Outpouring of
the Holy Spirit."
First Schools of various grades were gradually started both in
^hoo?s! Calcutta and in several other of the chief cities of North India ;
and every effort was made to introduce what was then known
as the New or National System of Education. This was the
pupil-teacher system started in England by Dr. Bell,| and
worked by the National Society, which was founded in 1811.
Bell himself had invented it at Madras, § and the Church
Missionary Society took it back to India. To us now it seems
curious that no attempt was in the first instance made to give
Christian teaching in those small schools. But the idea was
to awaken a desire for knowledge, however simple, as a road
* Not to be confonnded with the town of that name near Benares, which
is a station of the L.lVl.S.
t The firm then was W. M. Watts. The business was in after years taken
over by Messrs. Gilbert and Rivington, who are s(il] the Society's chief
prin'^ers.
% ^nd, almost simultaneously, by Thomas Lancaster, who instituted the
" Hritisli" or undenominational form of education, in contradistinction to the
" National " education of Bell and the Church. The controversy between the
advocates of the?e systems was as bitter then as it has been in recent years.
§ He was an army chaplain there, and superintended the education of the
boys at the Militbry Orphan Asylum. One day he chanced to see some
Native children writing with their fingers on the sand. He told a teacher at
the school to teach the aljdiabet in the same way ; but the teacher neglected
to do BO, and the'ii Bell set an elder boy to teach the j'ounger so. This was
the origin of the whole ]nipil-teacher system, the discovery of which was
welcomed in England with quite extraordinary enthusiasm. See Overton,
English Chiircit in the Kiiiefeenth Century, chap. vii.
India : The Opened Door ; the Entering In 195
by which the Gospel should afterwards travel. Of the first Part III.
school opened, at Kidderpore, a suburb of Calcutta, the Com- 1812-24.
mittee say in the Eeport of 1817, — "It is under the care of Chap. 15.
the missionaries, hut is not likely to alarm prejudice, as the
schoolmaster is not a Christian." It would be easy to criti-
cize such a system now. Apparently it was criticized then ;
for the Committee, in the Eeport of 1819, entered into a careful
defence of it. " Where we cannot effect what we would,"
they say, "it is the part of prudence to attempt what w^e
can."
And certainly this system did prove the thin end of the wedge.
For example, at and around Burdwan, an important town ^urdwan.
seventy miles north-east of Calcutta, several village schools were
started by a Christian officer stationed there, Captain Stewart,
in communication with the Corresponding Committee and with
funds provided by them. At first the Scriptm'es were not even
read in them ; and Thomason wrote that he thought Captain
Stewart had acted " very wisely." Then it was arranged to open
a central school in the town, at which English should be taught,
and to which should be drafted the most promising of the village
scholars. Here we see the embryo " Anglo- Vernacular School."
And as the scholars could not come in daily, Stewart provided
lodging and food for them for the inside of each week — in which
plan we see the embryo Mission Boarding-School. After this
had been going on for a year, Thomason wrote: — "Burdwan is
now ripe for a Missionary. He will have a large School of Boys
prepared for him, already well taught, capable of receiving any
instruction that he may judge it expedient to impart. He will
have escaped the drudgery of elementary instruction, and will
sit down at once to the full and mature labours of a Missionary " ;
and Stewart, having thus gained the confidence of the parents,
gave notice that the Christian Scriptures would be introduced
into the central school when the missionary arrived. In due
course he did arrive ; and after another year, the English resi-
dents at Burdwan, invited to the annual Examination, beheld
with astonishment the Gospels being read, taught, and questioned
upon, in a school of Heathen boys, with their Heathen parents
looking on. " The Brahmans stood by, and heard their boys
speak of Jesus as the Son of God and the Saviour of the World,
and of His command to go and preach the Gospel to all people,
without uttering a word." Yet the boys themselves, only a few
months before, had objected to read any book which contained
the name of Jesus. The following year, 1822, the report was,
" The Gospels are now read in all the schools. Who could have
expected, a year ago, to see a thousand Hindu children reading
the Gospel?" The w^edge had been driven home; and it is
simple matter of historical fact that more converts from Hinduism
have been gathered into the Christian Church through the ^""jj*^ °*
influence, direct or indirect, of schools, than by any other one work.
o 2
196 India : 7 he Opened Door', the Entering In
Part III. instrumentality."- Even at the present day, when the evan-
1812-24. gehstic preacher or lecturer goes out from England for a winter's
^P' ^' campaign among English-speaking Natives, the knowledge of
Christianity that he builds upon in addressing those who are still
Heathen has been gained by them in Mission Schools. "When
one and another yields to the claims of Christ pressed by these
evangelists, he yields to a Lord and Saviour whose claims he
well knew before — claims which, humanly speaking, he would
not have recognized now but for that prior knowledge.
One of the missionaries who was located at Burdwan bore a
name which has become highly honoured in his distinguished
The sons. This was the Eev. John Perowne, who went out and
erownes. JJJ^l3Q^J,g^ g^j^ Burdwau scveu years. He was the father of Bishop
J. J. S. Perowne, of Worcester ; of Dr. E. H. Perowne, Master of
Corpus ; and of Archdeacon T. T. Perowne, of Norwich.
No other station in Bengal proper, outside the capital, was
occupied except Burdwan. But higher up the great plain of the
Ganges, in that part of India afterwards (in 1833) designated
the North-West Provinces, w^ork had been begun at several cities,
generally throiigh the influence of Anglo-Indians ah-eady there.
Corric's residence at Agra as chaplain had fixed the location
there of Abdul Masih ; and during the period now under review,
the faithful old evangelist continued his labours amid the respect
of all who knew him. He was supported by the counsel and
sympathy of a godly officer, Lieutenant Tomkyns. Corrie's
appointment to Benares, on his return from his furlough, had
issued in a determination on the part of the Society to assault
that great fortress of Hindu idolatry. His ow^n heart w-as
deeply moved by the scenes around him. He was no modern
globe-trotter, viewing the degrading superstitions of Benares with
languid curiosity. Like St. Paul at Athens, his spirit was stirred
within him, and he saw in those crowds of deluded devotees
inawartal beings who might be living for the glory of God.
'ote also of a neighbouring district, quite a small one,
* Not to friend of his was magistrate, that in it two widows, on
IS a ^f-tio" (^ge, were burnt every month ; that six lepers were
over by Messr® within the year ; and that one hundred persons had,
prin"ters. drowned themselves in w^ells, in revenge for some
X 4nd, almost unexpected opening for good work in Benares
I' Hritisji" or midex a wealthy Hindu, named Jay Narain, establishing
National " educatio, i^rge Boys' School, and handing it over to the
advocates of the^e svs. % ■ Z m • j- o i, i u
§ HewasanarmychlJ^^o^i^^y- ^^^^^ g^'^^* School has ever smce
bovs at the MilitbrV ()rpi|ducational agency, and has given a know-
Native children writing -witi faith to many v/ho have only embraced the
the school to teach the alphal
to do so, and then Bell set ai i. i £ -n • j
ti.f. r.y.\ u. r.t i-v. Y , '' "nges, not tar from Benares, was occupied
lue origin ot the whole ])up° ^
welcomed in England with qi
£nglts}t Church in the Nineteenth reckoning the large accessions from the non-
India: The Opened Door; the Entering In 197
also at Corrie's instance. It was a Government station for invalid Part III.
soldiers, and the policy at that time was to begin by providing i^^^^"t*
schools for the children of Englishmen, who, like the rest of the ^^'
Eurasian population, were much neglected. That this class was
worth caring for was illustrated by the fact that the missionary
who was stationed at Chunar, and whose name will ever be
inseparably connected with it, William Bowley, was himself an
Eurasian. He was at first employed as a catechist. Then, when
Bishop Middleton declined to ordain Natives of the country, he
received Lutheran orders, from three of the Lutheran ministers
already in the field, at the same time as Abdul Masih. In 1825,
again along with Abdul Masih, he was ordained as an Anglican
clergyman by Bishop Heber. He laboured at Chunar with
exemplary devotion for nearly thirty years. Greenwood, who has
been mentioned more than once before as one of the first two
English clergymen engaged as missionaries in India, was also at
Chunar, doing the English part of the work.
At Meerut, the furthest to the north-west of all the stations, an Meemt:
interesting work was carried on under the superintendence of verts. "^°"'
another of the zealous chaplains, the Eev. Henry Fisher. Two
particularly interesting converts here come into view. The first
was a Brahman named Permanund, who had been converted to
Christ under the teaching of the Baptist missionary mentioned in
a former chapter as having been twice sent down from the North-
West under guard by order of the Government.''' Ho had not,
however, lieen Ixxptizod, because he wished his infant son to be
admitted into the visible Church with him, and this, of course,
the Baptist missionary would not do. He came under the notice
of Mrs. Sherwood, the wife of an officer at Meerut, and the well-
k nown authoress of excellent books for young people ; and in
1 815 she obtained for him an appointment as schoolmaster under
the C.M.S. Corresponding Conmiittee. He was thus the Society's
first agent in that city ; and at Christmas, 1816, he was baptized
by Mr. Fisher by the name of Anund Masih (Joy of Christ). He
laboured for twenty years, and then was ordained. It is a thing
to remember that the first Native clergyman of the Church of
England in North India (Abdul Masih) had been a Mohammedan,
and that the second (Anund Masih) had been a Brahman — the two
classes from which those who knew not the power of Divine
grace had often declared that no converts could be won.
The other interesting convert at Meerut was a non-commissioned
officer in the 25th Sepoy regiment, a Brahman of very high caste,
who, having long been convinced of the folly of idolatry, and
having seen something of Christian worship when sei-ving in
Mauritius, came spontaneously to a room over the city gate
at Meerut, where Anund Masih had gathered a few converts,
and at once joined the little community, and was baptized by the
* See p. y9.
iq8 India : The Opened Door; the Entering In
Part III. name of Matthew Prabhu-din. The officer commanding the
PK.^^"^*' ^'^o^™6^^ reported to the Government " so singular and unprece-
^^' ' ■ dented an occm-rence " as the conversion of a Sepoy to Christianity,
Sepoy stating that "the greatest consternation" prevailed among the
cashi>red. Native troops, and that serious mischief might result. The
Governor-General ordered a special Commission of Inquiry, and
it turned out that the only " consternation " had been among the
English officers, and that Prabhu-din, though he could no longer
eat with the Brahmans in the regiment, was still respected by
them as a good soldier. Nevertheless, he was dismissed,
"rejected," wrote Fisher, " by his earthly commander, because
he was a Christian." The Government allowed him his pension,
and afterwards offered him admission to another regiment ; but
this he declined, saying he had done nothing to deserve dismissal
from his own." He continued a faithful Christian, and was often
alluded to in warm terms in Mr. Fisher's reports.
The Society had also for some time schools and agents at
Allahabad, Lucknow, and Delhi. The first Church of England
work, therefore, at the last-named city, now famous as a great
S.P.G. centre, was done by the C.M.S. Anund Masih frequently
visited Delhi, and a sect of Hindu ascetics called Saadhs came
imder his influence ; but no great results followed. It is also
On the ^^ noteworthy that the first attempt to carry the Gospel to Thibet
THbet." was made by the Society during this period. At Titalya, then
a military station in the Himalayas, the commanding officer,
Captain Latter, was a zealous Christian, and at his instance the
German missionary Schroter, who accompanied Greenwood and
Norton to India in 1815, was appointed to that place, with a view
to his studying the Thibetan language, becoming acquainted with
the people, and preparing Scriptures and tracts for them. His
letters, and those of Captain Latter, during four or five years, are
very interesting; but he died in 1820, the first C.M.S. missionary
removed by death in any Mission except West Africa ; and Latter
also dying soon afterwards, the enterprise was never resumed.
But Schroter left important MSS. of his Thibetan studies, and
these were handed over to Carey and the Serampore Mission as a
help to the translational work going on there, while his valuable
collection of books on Thibet was given to Bishop's College.
Schroter himself was a remarkable man— a great linguist and a
true and humble missionary. So also were the next two men
who died in India, Schnarre and La Eoche, both likewise
Lutherans.
One more important forward step taken at this time in North
* The full details, with the official correspondence and minutes of the
Commission of Inquiry, are published in Wilkinson's Sket^'hes of Chrinfianitii
in North India (London- 1844). Sir John Kayo, who is geoerally on the
Christian side upon questions of the kind, disputes the fact of the man being
dismissed because he was a Christian {Clwistianity in India, p. 342) ; but
the official documents seem decisive on the point.
Imdia : The Opf.s'ed Door; the Entering In igq
India calls for notice. In 1820, Miss M. A. Cooke was sent out Part III.
by the British and Foreign School Society, at the request of a p^^^~^^"
local educational body at Calcutta, with a view to her starting a "^" ' "
school for Hindu girls. Female education had already been First girls'
successfully begun at Serampore by Mrs. Marshman, of the^^°g°'^ =
Ba))tist I\Iission; and Miss Cooke was to make a further attempt Cooke.
in the same direction. After a few months, the local body found
itself without funds to go on, and transferred Miss Cooke to the
C.M.S. While she was still studying Bengali, and wondering in
what way she might presently begin to work, an incident occurred
which gave her an unexpected opening. On January 25th, 1822
— a date worth noting — Miss Cooke visited one of the Boys'
Schools, in order to observe the pronunciation of the language.
" An European Female," as the Report quaintly styles her, in the
heart of the native town, was a novelty which drew a crowd I'ound
the school door. In the crowd was a little girl, whom the Native
teacher drove away, telling Miss Cooke that the child had for
three months been disturbing them by begging to be allowed to
learn to read with the boys. Miss Cooke immediately said that
she would come the very next day, and begin to teach her as well
as she could. Next day, accordingly, she went again, accom-
panied by an Englishwoman who had been long in India and
spoke Bengali well. They found fifteen girls assembled, and
their mothers standing outside, eagerly peering through the
lattice. The women were admitted, and a most interesting con-
versation took place. The lady friend, who is not named, thus
narrates it : —
" Thoy inquired whether Miss Cooke was married. I answered No.
Had she been, or was she goinc^ to be ?
'"No: she is married, or devoted, to your children: she lieard in
Kiicjland that the women of tliis country were kept in total ignorance;
tliat tliey were not tauglit even to read and write, and that tlie men
alone were allowed to learn, and that there was no female to teach you.
She therefore felt much sorrow for your state, and determined to leave
her country, her pareuts, her friends, and every other advantage, and
come here for the sole puri)ose of educatini; your female cliildren."
" They with one voice cried out, smiting their bosoms with their right
hands, ' Oh. what a pearl of a woman is this!'
" I added, ' She has given up every eartlily expectation to come here :
she seeks not the riches of this world, but that she may promote your
best interests.'
" ' Our children are yours ! we give them to you ! ' replied two or throe
of the mothers at once.'
Two days afterwards this lady went again : —
"One asked, 'What will l)e tlie u.se of learning to our female
children !' "
" T said. ' It will enable them to be more useful to their families : and
it will tend to gain them resjiect, and increase the harmony of families."
" ' True,' said one, " our husbands now look upon us as little better
than brutes.'
200 India : The Opened Door ; the Entering In
Part III. " Another said, ' And what benefit will yoih derive ? '
1812-24. " ' The only return we wish is to promote your happiness.'
Chap. 15. " ' Then I suppose this is a holy work, and pleasing to your God.' "
It is a far cry from this simple beginning to the accomplished
Christian Indian ladies who are graduates of the Universities ; yet
the one has led on, step by step, to the other. Miss Cooke, at
least, had faith to beheve in great results. In a few weeks,
petitions began to come to her asking for a girls' school in this
and that street, and when she sent to England her first report, she
could tell of fifteen schools at work, and nearly four hundred girls
in attendance. Eurasian girls had been obtained from the Female
Orphan Asylum as teachers. Miss Cooke suggested that Girls'
Schools throughout England should be invited to contribute
specially to this work; and, recollecting the Eoyal Letter in
favour of the S.P.G. four years before, she added, " Would that
the King would command a Sermon to be preached for the Cause
throughout his Dominions ! " Meanwhile the Calcutta Committee,
true to their principle of appealing primarily to the English in
India, opened a special fund, which speedily reached 3000
rupees, the Marquis of Hastings (the Governor- General) and the
Marchioness giving 200 each.
A year or two after this. Miss Cooke was married to one of the
new missionaries, the Eev. Isaac Wilson ; but she continued her
labours zealously, both during her married life and long after she
became a widow in 1828.
Bombay. Leaving North India, we come to the Bombay Presidency. In
1818, a Corresponding Committee was formed by the Eev. Thomas
Carr, another of the zealous chaplains (afterwards first Bishop of
Bombay) ; and in 1820, a Cheshire curate, the Eev. E. Kenney,
was sent out by the Society, the first missionary of the Church of
England in Western India. He began earnestly, but he only
stayed six years, and the work for long after that was on a very
small scale.
Madras. The story of the Missions in the South is very different. It
was in the Madras Presidency that the Danish and German Mis-
sions, supported by the S.P.C.K., had been carried on all through
the eighteenth century. The most important centres were Tranque-
bar, which always remained in direct connexion with Denmark,
and Tanjore, Trichinopoly, and Madras, which were definitely
S.P.C.K. Missions. As before mentioned, the work had greatly
languished after the death of Schwartz, and was at its lowest ebb
during the first twenty years of this century. I. C. Kohlhoft" was
at Tanjore, and Pohle at Trichinopoly ; and there were a few
Natives also in Lutheran orders, who were called "country
priests." Three more were so ordained in 1818, four years after
there was a Bishop in India, a notable circumstance in S.P.C.K.
history. The earhest C.M.S. missionaries were sent to assist
these Missions. Schnarre, and afterwards Bilrenbruck, were in
charge at Tranquebar, after the death of the Danish veteran Dr.
India: The Opened Door; the Entering In 201
John ; and Ehcnius and L. Schmid at Madras. But the latter 1'akt III.
brethren, and others who followed them, among whom J ^^S
Kidsdale should be specially named, presently began independent
work in and around the capital. A church was built m Black
Town (the most populous native quarter of INIadras) m loiJ ; ^^ihi
the three methods already specified in the account of r«Jorth
India were all adopted also at Madras. Tamil books and tracts
were prepared and printed in large numbers at the mission press,
and some Telugu works also; many vernacular schools were
opened ; and a Seminary for training Native evangehsts was
But the principal interest of the Southern Missions is derived Jra^van-
from Travancore and Tinnevelly. Concerning Travancore it
need only be said here that Norton, one of the first two Eng ish
ordained missionaries, was sent there shortly after his arrival in
India in 1815, and took up his residence in the following year at
AUepie, where he laboured twenty-five years, and died at his post;
and that the famous triumvirate, Benjamin Bailey, Henry Baker,
and Joseph Fenn, went to Cottayam in 1818-19. These three
were specially commissioned to work for the revival of the Syrian
Church ; and this branch of the Society's enterprise will come
before us in another chapter. _ , Tvr i
Of Tinnevelly, the famous southernmost province in the Madras r^nne-
Presidency, more must be said. Its missionary history dates ^1,,^-
back to 1771, in which year Schwartz's journal mentions that one « ^^
of his Native Christians from Trichinopoly was reading the Gospel
to the Heathen there. In 1778, Schwartz himself visited Palam-
cotta, the English capital of the province, three miles from
Tinnevelly town, and found a few Christians there. He baptized
a Brahman widow who had been living with an English ofiicer,
and been taught by him the rudiments of Christianity. She
received the name of Clorinda, and w^as afterwards chiefly instru-
mental in building a little church. In 1780, Pohle visited
Palamcotta, and organized the congregation ; and m 1786, when
Schwartz paid them a second visit, they numbered 160 persons.
In 1790 he ordained, according to the Lutheran use, one of his
best catechists, Satvanadhan, and put him in charge, speaking of
his zeal, love, aiid self-denial, in the highest terms. This
ordination was the one over which the S.P.C.K. so rejoiced, as
before mentioned. ''= As a further evidence of its sense of the
importance of this opening, the S.P.C.K. sent JuMiicke, a new
German missionary, to Tinnevelly, and he laboured there till his
death in 1800. The harvest from the seed sown by him and
Satyanadhan was great. Thousands were baptized by Gencke,
one of the Tanjore missionaries, in the first five years of this
century ; no less tlian 5095 in three months in 1802. But from
1806 to 1816 no missionary visited Tinnevelly; there were, in
• See p. 23.
S.P.C.K.
efforts.
202 India : The Opened Door ; the Entering in
Part III. fact, as we have seen, none to go ; and the work fell all to pieces.
Ch^^is' -'^^^■^^P^ ^^^^ bai^tizing had been too rapid ; certainly the caste
^P" ■ customs tolerated were themselves enough to eat the life out of
the Christian community ; and in 1816 there were only 3000
professing Christians left.
2i°"f^i^^ " ■'■^ *^^* y®^^ another of the good chaplains, the Eev. James
Hough, was appointed to Palamcotta ; and to him is due the re-
organization, revival, and extension of the Missions in Tinnevelly.
He at once made diligent inquiries about the Christians, and found
the three thousand souls scattered among sixty villages, without
schools, and without Tamil Testaments even for the few who could
read. But they were living in peace, and on the whole he was
pleased. The two chief villages were Nazareth and Mothellur,
where he found " country priests " ministering to the people.
He at once sent a report home to the S.P.C.K., but without
waiting for its aid he at his own expense started schools and
obtained Testaments, Prayer-books, and tracts from Madras, and
himself began to learn Tamil. The S.P.C.K. supplied a little
money, but could send no men, being unable to reinforce even its
larger Missions in Tanjore and Trichinopoly. At length Hough
applied to the CM. S. Corresponding Committee at Madras ; and
in 1820 Ehenius and B. Schmid were sent to Palamcotta. They
were warmly welcomed by Hough, who was on the point of
retiring in Ijroken health. He wrote to the Society : —
" I can now look forward to my approaching departure hence with
less regret. Yet, as the scone of my labours, the object of my anxieties,
the subject of my prayers, and the source of my delight, for four years
past, I cannot entertain tlie thought of quitting it foi- ever without
painful emotion. I am most thankful for having been permitted to
make a small beginning here in the noble work of turning the Heathen
from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God."
For several years these two good men bore the whole burden
of the Tinnevelly Mission. Schmid supervised the schools ;
Ehenius, with his attractive personality and perfect knowledge
of Tamil, shepherded the S.P.C.K. congregations and directed the
S.P.C.K. catechists, and also, by his preaching all over the district,
started extensive new work under his own Society. The transfer
of the S.P.C.K. Missions to the S.P.G., the arrival of the first
S.P.G. missionaries, the friendly division of the territory, and the
further development of C.M.S. work, belong to a later period.
Here it may suffice to say that, under Ehenius's holy influence
and untiring energy, there seemed for a time as if an old pre-
diction of Jaenicke's might be fulfilled : " There is every reason
to hope that at a future period Christianity will prevail in the
Tinnevelly district."
Rhenius.
ClIAPTEU XVI.
"Insular Missions": New Zealand, Ceylon, West
Indies, Malta.
Samuel Marsden and the Maoris The New Zealand Mission-
Christmas Day, 1814 The Lay Settlers— Trials and Disappoint-
ments—Henry and William Williams— The Openings in Ceylon
and the First Missionaries— Antigua. Barbadoes, Honduras— Malta
as a Centre of Influence.
'• T,ff (liriii . . . th'rhire His praise in the islands." — Isa. xlii. 12.
HE term "Insular Missions" is not a recognized one Part III.
in C.M.S. phraseology; but it is to be found m ^^,^^^ -Jg
occasional use in the early Keports, and in that of ^_
1820 a very interesting passage is quoted and adopted
from the local Report of one of the Associations (not
named), which puts the thought of the Isles of the Sea in a very
striking'way. After surveying the Continents of Asia and Africa,
the " Insular Missions," it' is suggested, might seem little worthy isUnd
of notice. " But 7chat is it that has placed us, the inhal)itants of ^„'|X"'
the British Islands, but a few ages since scarcely included m the BntUh
known world, and described only by the whiteness of our clilTs,
the tin on our coast, and our strange superstitions — trJiat has
placed us in a position from which we parcel out the globe? . . .
And who shall sav that the Cinghalese, or the New Zealandcrs,
or the West Indian brethren of those Africans in whom so wonder-
ful a change has already taken place, may not, when our still
enlarging Missions shall' have made them fully acquainted with
Him "through \Viiom all have access by one Spirit unto the same
Father, rise to our elevation, or even reach a standard of spiiitiuil
dignity and power which Christendom has not known since the
Apostolic Age? " Might not those Islands, continues this Report,
"one day inquire in </;c//- Missionary Meetings how the British
Church may be revived ? "
Several great islands in the various oceans presented them-
selves from time to time to the thoughts of the C.M.S. leaders.
Ceylon came into view in the very first year. The West Indies,
and Madagascar, and Sumatra, and the Malay Archipelago, were
brought mider their notice by governors, chaplains, and other
Englishmen resident or interested in them. Malta— great his-
torically and strategically, if not in size— asked for help by the
204 '''•Insular Missions^* :
Part III. mouth of a Eoman Catholic priest. The innumerable islands of
pP^^^t' the Southern Seas might have been suggested by the great enter-
^^^' ' prise of the London Missionary Society in some of them ; but
perhaps the very fact that they were partly thus provided for
excluded them from consideration, as they are never alluded to as
a possible field. But a Mission to New Zealand was the second
undertaken by the Society ; and not one of its Missions has a more
thrilling history.
New Zealand.
The shipping of the first cargo of convicts to Botany Bay has
been referred to in a previous chapter as one of the several events
that marked in so striking a way the year 1786. The second of
the Government chaplains sent out to the settlement thus formed
Samuel was Samucl Marsden, whose heroic enterprise, prolonged through
h? N^w" ™oi'e than forty years, has justly earned for him the title of the
South Apostle of New Zealand. The son of a Yorkshire tradesman,
Wales. ggj-j|- ^Q Cambridge by the Elland Society (an association for
assisting godly men to study for holy orders), he was appointed in
1793, through the recommendation of Wilberforce, chaplain to the
penal establishment. "For many years," to use the words of
Dean Jacobs, the historian of the Church of New Zealand, "he
carried on singlehanded a most determined struggle against the
vilest imaginable iniquities, the grossest abuses of authority, and
the most shameless licentiousness shielded by official influence.
As a sure consequence, he provoked the virulent opposition of
powerful and unscrupulous adversaries — men interested in main-
taining the abuses he exposed — who strove for years, though
happily without success, to blacken his character and drive him
from the Colony." * With this conflict, however, we have
nothing to do. But while Marsden was faithfully doing his duty
to God and man in New South Wales, and while he did not
neglect, as we shall see hereafter, the downtrodden and degraded
aborigines of Australia, his sympathies were especially drawn out
towards the Maori race of New Zealand.
New Zealand was so named by the Dutch navigator, Tasman,
who discovered the islands in 1642. He did not, however, venture
to land, in the face of the warlike demonstration made against
him by the Natives ; and it was left to Captain Cook, more than a
century later (1769), to begin friendly intercourse with them.
But the adventurous traffic that sprang up in the South Seas in
consequence of Cook's discoveries was marked by the treachery
and fraud and violence by which the pioneers of so-called
"Christian commerce and civilization" among barbarous races
have so often disgraced the Christian name. The authentic
accounts of the merciless cruelties perpetrated by English traders
on the Maoris, who in good faith put themselves in their power,
* Colonial Church Histories : New Zealand. By the Very Rev. Henry
Jacobs, D.D., Dean of Christchurch, New Zealand. S.P.C.K., 1888.
J^Eiv Zealand, Ceylon^ West Indie';, Malta 20?
give the reader the same kind of sickening shudder that one feels TaRt m.
on seeing dumb animals wantonly ill-treated. Of course retalia- ^i«i^ ^•
tion ensued whenever a chance for it occurred. Nevertheless, the J_
Maori savages, fierce as they were, and addicted to cannibalism,
proved to be one of the finest aboriginal races with whom English-
men ever came in contact.
The first Maoris that :Marsden saw were two men who had l^een Marsden
brought by Captain King, Governor of the penal settlement on Maoris.
Norfolk Island, to Port Jackson (the great inlet now known as
Sydney Harbour), with a view to their giving hints on the cultiva-
tion of New Zealand flax {jjhormium tcnax). Subsequently others
came over to New South Wales, and Marsden strove to do them
good and bring them under the sound of the Gospel. He con-
stantly received them at his own house at Paramatta (fifteen miles
inland from Sydney), and put up huts in his garden for their
accommodation, as many as thirty being sometimes there at once.
There were awkward incidents now and then. On one occasion
a lad died who was the nephew of a chief, and his uncle was
about to kill a slave, to attend his spirit in the invisi])le woild.
With great diflicultv he was persuaded to defer it till Marsden,
who was absent, came home. Then he had to give way to
Marsden's protestations. One of the chiefs entertained in 1806
was a man of great intelligence named Te Pahi (Tippaheo), who
was so struck bv what he saw of the arts of life that he bogged
for some one to be sent over to teach his countrymen. In 1808, ^ars^den-s
Marsden visited England, and at once came to the Church c^Si.s.
Missionary Society to plead for the Maori.
The Society w^as then still in its infancy. It had sent out
exactly five missionaries, and these to a Mission-field compara-
tively near, and familiar to the leaders through the Sierra Leone
Company, and indeed to some of them, Zachary Macaulay and
Melville Home for instance, from personal knowledge. Now they
were asked to send men to the Antipodes, to a land w^hence it
would take twelve months to get an answer to a letter, to a race
of warlike barbarians among whom no Europeans had yet settled.
It must have been a startling suggestion, even to men of faith like
Pratt and John Venn. Moreover they had had a serious warning
regarding the South Seas by the disasters and disappointments
that had attended the London Missionary Society's great enter-
prise. Nevertheless, after the second Committee meeting for the
consideration of the proposal, it was decided to accept it. After
all, no elaborate scheme was before them; no gi'eat company of
settlers, going forth in their own ship, as in the case of Tahiti,
was asked for. Marsden did not even suggest a " Mission," in
our sense of the word. He only asked for three mechanics. His
theory was the theory of many now who know nothing of the
history of Missions. There is no excuse for them now ; but there
was much excuse for INIarsden and the Society then. The
theory seemed reasonable on the surface ; and they had no
The "lay
206 ^^ Insular Missions ^^ :
Part III. experience to correct it. It was this, expressed in Marsden's own
1812-24. ,vords:-
Chap. 16. ... .
"Nothing in my opinion can pave tlio way for the introthiction of tlie
Gospel but civilization, — and that can only be acconiplishod among
the Heathen by the arts. . . . The arts and religion should go together.
The attention of the Heathen can be gained, and their vagrant habits
corrected, only by the arts. Till their attention is gained, and moral
and industrious habits are induced, little or no progress can be made in
teaching them the Gospel. ... To preach the Gospel without the aid
of the arts will never succeed among the Heathen for any time."
Marsden and the Society were to learn the fallacy of this
by hard experience, and it was the New Zealand Mission that
was to teach them. However, two men were found who seemed
settlers." suitable, William Hall, a joiner, recommended by Mr. Fawcett
of Carlisle, and John King, a shoemaker, recommended by
Daniel Wilson, then at Oxford (as Vice-Principal of St. Edmund
Hall). It did not occur to the Committee to give them any
theological instruction. They were plain Christian men, and if
they were by-and-by to give any teaching at all, it would be of
the simplest character. But they did have some preparation.
Hall was sent to Hull to learn something of ship-building and
navigation, and King to a rope-walk to learn spinning, &g. The
third man wanted should have been a smith ; but a smith did not
appear. Basil Woodd, however, brought a young schoolmaster,
who also understood farming, Thomas Kendall. Humble as such
a band was, it was found desirable to secure the "favour" of
Lord Castlereagh, then Secretary for the Colonies, and of Colonel
Macquarie, who was going out to New South Wales as Governor.
A passage was obtained, with some difficulty, for Hall a»d King
by the transport-ship Ann (by which Mr. Marsden also sailed), on
condition of their lending a hand on the voyage when required.
They were to have £20 a year for personal expenses, and to be
provided with seeds, live stock, and tools, and then to maintain
themselves. They are never called "missionaries" in the old
Eeports, but at first " lay settlers," and some years later
" teachers." Kendall, who did not sail till later, is called " school-
master " until his ordination.
Their in- Inexperienced as the Committee were in such a Mission as this
"'""'" — Qy. indeed in any Mission — the Instructions to Hall and King
are singularly good and wise. The Society's object, they said,
was " to introduce amongst the Natives the knowledge of Christ ;
and in order to this, the Arts of Civilized Life." The men are
instructed as to both their religious and their civil life. As
regards religious conduct, they are enjoined (1) to guard earnestly
the sacredness of the sabbath-day ; (2) never to omit family
worship, and to " perform it as publicly as possible, by reading
Scripture or singing " loud enough to be heard by a passing
Native." " To show them that you worship your God every
day, as Daniel did, cannot but make some impression on them."
structions.
New Zealand^ Cf.ylon^ West Indies^ Malta 207
(3) They were to converse with the Natives about sin and Part I'IL
salvation " when employed in planting potatoes, sowing corn, ||^'^~^"*;
or in any other occupation." (4) They were to gather the '^P^^-
children together for instruction as soon as possible. " While
catechizing them, you may speak through them to the grown
people." Then as regards civil conduct, they are bidden (1) to
"spend no time in idleness," but "occupy every moment set
apart for laI)our in agriculture, building houses or boats,
spinning twine, or some other useful occupation." " If you
indulge in idleness, you will be ruined." (2) To make them-
selves independent in respect of provisions, by cultivating grain
and rearing pigs and poultry. (3) To give no presents to the
Natives, and to receive none. (4) To show the Natives the
advantage of industry by sending their handiwork (mats, &c.) to
Port Jackson for sale. (5) On no account to be drawn into wars.
"Tell them you are forbidden by the Chiefs who have sent you
out.'.'
The .-!//// sailed in August, 1809, and reached Port Jackson in Their
February. On the voyage one of those unexpected incidents ^°y^^^-
occurred which in missionary history have so often displayed
the particular providence of God. A poor, haggard Maori was
found on board, who, after the strangest adventures, and after
the most barbarous treatment by English captains, had been
brought to England and turned ashore to starve ; and this Maori,
whose name was Euatara," proved to be a nephew of the chief
Te Pahi, and himself a chief likewise. His joy at learning the
errand of Hall and King may be imagined, and he eagerly
promised them all assistance and protection in his power. But
on arriving at Port Jackson, Marsden and his party had to meet
a grievous disappointment. News had just come that the
British ship Boijd luul been burnt by the Maoris, and the crew
killed and eaten. This, it was afterwards proved, was but in
retaliation for murders by traders ; and in its turn the massacre
was revenged by a party of whalers, who attacked and burnt Te
Pahi's village, although he himself had done all in his power to
save the crew of the Boyd, and did in fact save some of them.
But these sad events put an end to any hope of a speedy settle-
ment in New Zealand.
After some months of weary waiting, a whaling-ship was found Long
willing to take the young chief Ruatara and land him in New '^^'''^'^•
Zealand, and he was sent in her to ascertain the prospects of
safely settling there. But nothing was heard of him for more
than a year, and Marsden could only wait anxiously, while the
Society at home began almost to despair of the enterprise. At
last Ruatara appeared at Port Jackson. The captain of the
whaler had refused to land him in New Zealand, but carried him
off to Norfolk Island and put him ashore destitute ; and at length
* Wiitteu in the earlier Reports "Duaterra."
2o8 ''^Insular Missions ^^ :
Tart III. he had persuaded another ship retiirniug to Port Jackson to
1812-24. take him back thither. Another attempt was made after a while,
Chap. 16. g^^j |.]^jg |.jj^g Euatara did land ; and the resnlt of his intercourse
with the other chiefs was that though they received his descrip-
tions of civilized life with mocking scepticism, they agreed to
welcome the settlers.
opposi- But now Marsden encountered fresh obstacles. The Colony of
tion of New South Wales thought the extermination of Maori savages
colonists • ^
more desirable than their conversion ; and the traders who were
profiting by fraud and violence all over the Southern Ocean
objected to any attempt by missionaries, w^hether in New
Zealand or at Tahiti, to preach honesty and morality and peace.
Every possible slander was set on foot against Marsden ; no one
supported him ; no ship would take him and his mechanics
across ; nor indeed would the Governor give him temporary
leave from his duties as chaplain to enable him to go. At last
he purchased a small brig of 110 tons, the Active, and sent
Kendall and Hall over to make further inquiries ; and on their
return with a favourable report, and bringing Euatara and other
Marsden chicfs witlTi them, the Governor gave him permission to go, and
to New i?iike the whole party with him, i.e. the three men from England,
with their wives and children, and half a dozen mechanics from
Port Jackson, and the Maori chiefs. The strange condition of
South Sea society at the time may be gathered from the com-
position of the crew of the Active : one Englishman, one Irish-
man, one Prussian, one Swede, one Norwegian, one American, one
white Colonist, one Maori, two Tahitians, and one Sandwich
Islander !
These few details have been given in order to convey, if
possible, some slight idea of the difficulties attending even the
preparations for a Mission to New Zealand in those days. It
was now November, 1814. Five years and three months had
elapsed since the Ann left England. Another year and three
months were yet to pass before the Society at home heard of
the settlement having really been begun. This was not sowing
the seed and waiting patiently for the harvest. It was waiting
for even an opportunity to sow the seed. Truly patience had her
perfect work in those days !
The voyage from Sydney to North Cape, the northern ex-
tremity of New Zealand, about 1000 miles due east, is now done
in four or five days by steamer. The Active left Port Jackson on
November 28th, and sighted North Cape on December 15th, a
good voyage for a little sailing vessel. The Bay of Islands,
whither she was bound, being the entrance to the district where
Euatara and other friendly chiefs were dominant, is a little to
the south of North Cape, on the further (east) side. How Marsden
heard that a deadly feud had sprung up between Euatara's tribe
and another ; how he at once landed, despite Euatara's warnings,
and, with only one Sydney man and an interpreter, went, un-
New Zealand^ Ceylon^ West Indies^ Malta 209
armed, straight to the hostile party ; how he slept that night in Part III,
their midst under the open canopy of heaven; how in the |8]2-24.
morning he persuaded them to make peace ; how he went on "^"
joyfully with his whole party to Euatara's tribe ; how the horse,
the bull, and the cows he had brought with him, excited the
Natives, whose largest animal was the pig ; how everything be-
tokened a prosperous start for the settlement, — has often been
told, and can be read again and again with deepest interest. Let
us come to Christmas Day. It fell that year on Sunday. Christmas
Ruatara had gathered his fellow-chiefs and people together. ^^^^ '^''♦•
" A very solemn silence prevailed. I rose and began the service
by singing the Old Hundredth Psalm, and I felt my very soul
melt within me when I viewed my congregation, and considered
the state they were in. After reading the service, I preached
from "St. Luke ii. 10, ' Behold, I bring you good tidings of great
joy, which shall be to all people.' " '•' Such is Marsden's simple
accoimt of one of the gi'eat historic scenes in the history of
Missions, — indeed one of the really great scenes in the history of
the British Colonial Empire, for the very existence of the now
flourishing Colony of New Zealand is due to the courage and
faith of Samuel Marsden in flinging himself among the Maoris.
The Mission he initiated on Christmas Day, 1814, tamed the race ;
and then, in poured the colonists.
Marsden spent two months in the country, and then returned
to his own duties in New South Wales. From Paramatta he
sent a full report of his proceedings home to England. It
arrived early in 1816, while Edward Bickersteth was on his
voyage out to Africa, and just before William Johnson sailed
thither. It excited the liveliest interest. There were yet to
pass many years before praise could ascend to God at the news
of Maori conversions ; but prayerful sympathy was called forth,
and Africa had already taught the Society that there must be a
sowing in tears before there could be a reaping in joy. One ripe
ear, however, was very quickly reaped, though not in New Zealand
itself. A young Maori, named Maui (Mowhee), who had been a Maori
under Marsden's instruction at Paramatta, worked his way to London.
England as a common sailor, and on reaching London was taken
by the captain to the Church Missionary House. The Society
received him, and sent him to Basil Woodd at Paddington ; and
there he showed evident signs of Divine grace in his heart. He
set to work to learn how to teach, hoping to go back to his
own countiy as a teacher; but, as in the case of Simeon Wilhelm
* Seventy-eight years after, on September 2Sth, 1802, the C.^r.S. Deputa-
tion to the Colonies landed at the beaatiful city of Auckland, a little south of
the Bay of Islands, and proceeded to the Cathedral, where were gathered
the Bishop and clergy and a large congregation of white colonists. Marsden's
text on Christmas Day, ISll, was the text of the first address, and the
Church of New Zealand was invited now to join in sending on the " pood
tidings of gi-eat joy '" to " all i)eople."
VOL. I. P
2 1 o " Ins ul a r Missions ' ' ;
Part III. the Susoo lad/'' disease struck him, and he died in the faith of
1812-24. Christ on December 28th, 1816, just two years after Marsden's
Chap, lb. chi-igti^^ag sermon at the Bay of Islands. A deep impression
was made by the Christian deaths of the young Negro and the
young Maori in London, within a few months of each other, and
before any decided encouragement had come to the praying
members of the Society from either Africa or New Zealand.
The names of Mowhee and Simeon Wilhelm were coupled in
many utterances of thankfulness in sermons and speeches all
over England ; and both their portraits appear in the same
volume of the Missionary Bcgister, 1818.
Meanwhile Marsden was carrying on a Maori Seminary at
Paramatta, where Natives might be more effectively trained in
" the arts of life " under his own eye than in New Zealand itself ;
suitable men being sent over from time to time. This Seminary
lasted for some years, with varying fortunes. At the Bay of
The Islands, the little band of settlers were patiently trying to win
settfemenT their Way among the Maoris. It proved wearying and discourag-
ing work. Euatara had died before Marsden left, and the loss of
his help and protection w^as keenly felt. Savagery of all kinds
abounded ; robberies were incessant ; and repeatedly the settlers
and their families were warned at night that they would be
murdered before morning. Hall and King made no progress in
the language, though Kendall did ; and it was hard to get even
the friendly Natives to learn anything, whether reading or writing
or handicrafts. And with all this, there was constant peril from
a settlement of escaped convicts on the opposite side of the Bay —
men of the most reckless character, whose wicked treatment of
the Maoris continually endangered the lives of all white people
In 1819, however, when, after the lapse of four years and a half,
Marsden paid a second visit to New Zealand, taking with him a
clergyman sent out by the Society to be the spiritual head of the
Mission — Mr. Butler, — and again when he paid his third visit, in
1820,— things looked brighter in several ways. The " arts of life "
really seemed to be progressing. There were fields of wheat ;
there were horses and cattle ; fruit-trees sent from Sydney were
flourishing ; blacksmith's shops, saw-pits, rope-walks, were at
work ; and a boarding-school was successful in tamiug and
teaching even the wild and volatile Maori children. Kendall was
especially efficient : he was the schoolmaster, the farmer, the
doctor, and the linguist. He had already prepared some small
papers in the Maori language. The settlers were gaining respect
and influence, insomuch that, although, within a year or two,
about one hundred Natives had been murdered by European
traders and escaped convicts, no retaliation had been attempted
upon the Mission settlement. The Committee were much en-
couraged ; they saw the good influence of even the small beginnings
* See p. 161.
New Zealand^ Ceylon, JFest Indies, Malta 211
of industrial, educational, medical, and lin<fuistic woik ; and they Part III.
hoped great things from the etibrts of the new Governor of New 1812-24.
South Wales, Sir Thomas Brisbane, in putting down the outrages ^"''''''- ^^•
perpetrated by Europeans — concerning which they had in an
earlier Kej)ort used this strong language : —
" Your Committee feel it strongly that Providential Guidance has
thrown the Society, in its two attempts among the more unciviHzcd
Heatlien, into conflict with the most rapacious of their countrymen.
But wlietlier it respects Western Africa or New Zealand, they will not
cease to protest against these enormities, and to wipe their hands of
these crimes : nor will they desist from employing all practicable methods
of redress, till such redress is actually obtained."
But a much darker period now ensued. A great chief named Hongi in
Hongi,- who was supposed by the missionaries and by Marsden ^"^land.
to be their best Maori friend and one likely to be soon influenced
by the Gospel, came to England with Kendall. He was received
with much respect and kindness by the Society's leaders ; and
one good thing resulted from the visit— he and Kendall were sent
to Cambridge for two months to enable that great scholar. Pro-
fessor Samuel Lee, " the Society's Orientalist," f to fix the grammar
of the Maori language ; and the Grammar and Vocabulary produced
by Lee became the foundation of all subsequent Maori translations.
Kendall was admitted to holy orders during their stay, and high
hopes were entertained of the future of the Mission. But it
turned out that Hongi's chief object in coming to England was to
obtain guns and gunpowder; that he had obtained a large quantity,
and that on his way back he purchased more at Sydney by selling
the valuable presents given him, including some from George IV.,
who had granted him an interview ; and his return to New
Zealand was the signal, not for peace and advance in civiHzation,
but for war and massacre and cannibalism. The narratives of his
proceedings are truly dreadful ; and the settlers were filled with
horror when they saw the heads of men and wooien tossed about
in wild fury, and tit-bits from human corpses brought to their own
dwellings and offered to them to eat. Worst of all, to the
shame and dismay of the little band, Kendall himself was Kendairs
proved to be the ally of Hongi, and seemingly the instigator, not treachery,
indeed of his cannibalism, but of his ambitious designs. The
Society had laid down strict rules against the use of guns and
gunpowder in bartering for food, and honest men like Hall and
King were ready to starve — as indeed they nearly did— rather than
disobey this rule. Kendall opposed them, and claimed liberty to
trade in arms and ammunition, and one or two of the Sydney men
sided with him. This led to the discovery of his alliance with
Hongi. In the Eeport of 1822, the Conmiittee say, referring to
the change in the chief's temper and attitude, — " Into the cii'cum-
* Written " Shung-hoe " in the earlier Keports.
t See p. 120.
r 2
212 " Ins ular Missions " ;
Part III. stances which led to this they will not now enter; they have
_[^12~^'t- obtained a clue to them, which will lead, they fear, to some
'^^' ' painful conclusions." In the following year the Committee
say :—
'• Had the whole number of labourers in this Mission maintained
among these Heathens the Christian spirit and character, the Committee
would have made comparatively light of its external difficulties ; but it
is with grief that they add that its main trials have arisen from within.
It has been found requisite, in the faithful discharge of the duty which
Christian Communities owe to the honour of that Name by which they
are called, to separate from the Society two Members of the Mission,
for conduct disgraceful to their profession. The Committee trust that
it will never become necessary again to exercise this painful duty : but
should the necessity at any time recur, the path of duty is obvious, as no
blessing from God can be expected, but in proportion as the simplicity
and purity of the Christian character are maintained."
Agents Qne of the two dismissed was, of course, Kendall ; the other
QismisscQ
w^as Mr. Butler's son. In the following year, a third man,
a mechanic, w^as dismissed ; and Mr. Butler himself, who
had come to England, withdrew. But several others — thirteen
had gone out from England up to 1823, and some from New South
Wales — were working and praying earnestly. In the Report of
1824 the Committee say : —
" In the midst of the evils which have arisen to this Mission from the
sins of some who have lieen engaged in it, and the infirmities of others,
God has not left Himself without witness in this land, but has maintained
among His people, under all the trials endured from the Natives, and the
still greater trials from some of their own body, faithful and devoted
Labourers, who, though they have felt, to use their own expression, as
' living Martyrs,' have continued to lift up holy hands in the midst of
these savage tribes, to labour unweariedly for their good, and to cause the
light of a meek and holy conversation to sliine aroiind them."
When we remember that all these sore trials were burdening the
minds and hearts of the Committee in the very year of the terrible
mortality at Sierra Leone, described in the Thirteenth Chapter,
we cannot but praise God that His grace enabled them to hold
on with unfaltering faith ; and that the blessing vouchsafed to
Johnson's work at Regent was fresh in their memories as a token,
after ail, of the favour of the Lord. Marsden, too, upon whom
fell the heaviest burden, in grappling on the spot with the diffi-
culties of the Mission, both external and internal, never despaired
for a moment. He had his previous experience with the L.M.S.
Tahiti Mission to fall back upon ; and that Mission now, after
years of trial, was being blessed beyond anticipation : —
" I had many a battle to fight [he wrote] for years, with some of the
first settlers sent out to the Society Islands, who turned out unprincipled
men. The Directors of the London Missionary Society despaired of
success, after they had expended many thousands of jjounds ; and they
frequently wrote to me on the subject, expressing theu' fears that they
must abandon the Mission. I never had myself, however, but one
New Zealand^ Ceylon^ West Indies^ Malta 213
opinion relative to that Mission— and that was that it woiikl succeed : Part III.
and God has now blessed the word of His grace to thousands of the poor 1812-24.
Heathen in those Islands." Cl.ap^l6.
He added, significantly,— " The way is still open, if Lal)Ourerscan
only be procured fit for the work ; and God will find these and
send them forth w^ien He sees meet. You have some excellent
ones of the earth in New Zealand, whom the Lord will assuredly
bless; but we must not sow and expect to reap in the same
day."
In that very year, 1822, was sent forth the man w^hom we may J*^^^^;^^^
regard as the first of the second generation of New Zealand mis- Henry
sionaries, and who was destined in God's providence to be one of wiihams.
the chief instruments in the evangelization of the Maori race.
Henry Williams had been an officer in the Na\y, and had served
in the wars with both France and the United States. He offered
to the Society in 1820, and received his education for the ministry
under a clerical relative, the Eev. E. G. Marsh. He was the
second candidate to receive holy orders from the Bishop
of London under the new Colonial Service Act;='= and he sailed,
with his wife and three children, on August 7th, 1822. The
Instructions given him are very significant. The Committee were
now realizing that if Civihzation preceded Christianity, it was very
likely to prove an obstacle to Christianity, and that the Gospel
did not need the " arts of hfe " as its precursors, how^ever useful
they might be to w^in attention to the Divine message, and,
as in this case, to make a Mission partly self-supporting. "It
is the great and ultimate purpose of this Mission," they said to
Henry Williams, " to bring the noble but benighted race of New
Zealanders into the enjoyment of the light and freedom of
the Gospel. To tJtis grand end, all the Societi/s measures are
subordinate."
" The Committee are the more earnest with you on this ponit, because,
in the constant attention which this Mission will require, for years to
come, to secular business, the temptation of the Labourers has been,
and will be, not to give a due proportion in their plans to Religious
Education and Instruction. . . .
" Go forth, then, in the true spirit of a devoted Missionary, haWng no
secular object in view, but desirous of bringing glory to God by advancing
the Kingdom of His Son. . . .
" The result of your labours, be well assured, will in due time show
itself. What a man soweth, that shall he also reap. Indefatigable
laboiu-s, unwearied patience, persevering pi-ayer, simple faith, and un-
failing love, will in the end produce their visible fruit to the praise and
glory of God ; while self-will, evil tempers, indolence, self-indulgence,
pursuit of gain, a worldly spirit, strife and contention, neglect of devotion,
and all those other evils to which we are by nature prone, would render you
unprofitable to New Zealand, and a burden to the Society ; and would
till you with self-reproach and st>rrow, if they did not end, as they have
done in some awful instances, in a state of apostasy from God."
* See p. 2 15.
214 " ^^'^ UL A R Missions ' ' ;
Part III. In the Address delivered at the same time by E. G. Marsh,
Pi^^'^^^t' there is a striking passage about self-defence. The New Zealand
^^^' ' missionaries were not only forbidden to use muskets for barter,
No fire- Mr. Marsh enjoins them not to use arms at all, even to save the
arms ! \\mq,% of their families : '■'' —
" As you are about to euter the territories of a savage and powerful
people, to commit yourselves to their hospitality, and to live inider their
laAvs, it would be vain to think of protecting yourselves by force against
their violence. It is impossible to shut your eyes to the fact that, so far
as human means are concerned, you must be considered as in their
power and at their mercy. . . . All oftensive instruments, therefore, it is
wise for a Missionary to renounce. As his object is })eaceful, so should
his hand be iniarmed. He should carry the olive-branc.-li, and not the
sword ; and sliould exhibit the example of a person who comes into the
enemy's camp in the sa-red character of a Herald of Peace. He will
therefore neither wear a sword, nor bestow one. He will persist in
abstaining from earthly weajions while lie is prosecuting a spiritual
warfare. He will say under all provocations, ' I will go in the strength
of the Lord God ; I will make mention of His righteousness only.' "
The reply of Henry Williams is also interesting, and just such
as might be expected from a naval officer entering missionary
service. He assures the Committee that he shall " consider it a
most sacred duty to regard" their orders at all times " as rigidly
as ever he did those of his Senior Officer while he was in His
Majesty's Service " ; and, referring to his wife, he says, " With
Mrs. H. regard to Mrs. Williams, I beg to say that she does not accom-
wiiiiams. pany me merely as my wife, but as a fellow-helper in the work."
Even at the end of the century, Henry Williams's example would
not be out of date !
Henry Williams proved to be a man after Marsden's own heart.
From the time of his arrival in New Zealand, the whole Mission
improved ; and Mrs. W^illiams, as he had said, was a true fellow-
worker. Trials, how^ever, were not over. A new station was
established, among new people ; and the thieving and threats
from which the earlier settlers had suffered, had now to be again
encountered. Moreover, "four young children in a very small
dwelling, which effectually excluded neither wind nor rain, was in
itself sufficiently inconvenient ; and to this was added the want
of a fire even in cold weather, for the walls of rushes were too
combustible to allow of one in the house " ; while the cooking
Mrs. Williams had to do in an open shed, whatever the weather.
That is, when there was anything to cook ; but the Natives stole
their fowls and destroyed their vegetables, and refused to supply
* There is no real inconsistency between these counsels and the duty of a
missionary to join, in case of urgent need, in a defensive fight under the
orders of the State, as recently in Uganda. What is here deprecated is his
defending the Mission against violence offered to it in virtue of its missionary
character. An English open-air preacher attacked by roughs would refrain
from inJLiring them in self-defence, but he would join in defending those very
roughs against a foi-eia'n invader.
Nfav Zealand, Crylon, West Indies, Malta 215
food except in exchange for guns and poAvder, which WilHams Part III.
resohitely decHned to barter. " Often," wrote he of his wife, " is ^^^^it'
she tired in her work, but never of it." ^^^'
Another of God's chosen instruments for the evangehzation of
New Zealand was now on his way out, in the person of Henry
WilUams's brother. WilHam Williams had been brought up to wliliams.
the medical profession, and had been assistant to a surgeon at
Southwell ; but on Henry's going forth as a missionary, he
determined to follow him. He went to Magdalen Hall (now
Hertford College) , Oxford, and took his degree in 1824 ; and in
July, 1825, he sailed with his young wife for New Zealand. '■'■ In
the Instructions, the Committee, perhaps encouraged by the
words that Henry Williams had uttered about his wife three
years before, specially addressed Mrs. Wilham Williams. They Mrs. w.
exhorted her to remember that "no country can be happy or ' '^'"^'
Christian but in proportion as its Females become so," and to
seek every opportunity of influencing the Maori women. "You
should rank," they said, "with those honourable Women of old
who laboured with even Apostles in the Gospel." In all
missionary histoly, has any woman proved herself more worthy
of this " rank " than Jane Williams ?
When Wilham Williams and his wife reached Sydney, they
were met by Henry in a little vessel, the Herald, which he,
profiting by his naval experience, had himself built at the Bay of
Islands, with the assistance of W. Hall, who, as will be remem-
bered, had learned something of ship-building at Hull before
leaving England seventeen years before. The Active had been
sold some time previously ; a vessel which had taken Marsden to
New Zealand for his fourth visit in 1823 had been wrecked ; and
Henry Williams had determined to supply the want himself.
Meanw^iile, not a few signs had appeared of the grace of God
working in Maori hearts. There were inquirers after the way of
salvation ; there were hopeful deaths ; and on September 14th,
1825, the first baptism took place, that of a chief named Eangi, F^|^st^^
on his deathbed. There could be no doubt of the genuineness of '^""^^
his faith : he received the name of " Christian " ; and he was the
first of a great company of believers destined to be gathered out
of one of the most savage and ferocious races ever met with.
But the great ingathering was not yet.
Ceylon.
The very first Eeport issued by the Society, in 1801, gives
evidence that, in wistfully surveying the wide fields of Heathendom,
the Committee did not pass over the Island of Ceylon. It had ^^y^^°j['^j^^
long been in the possession of Holland, having been taken by that EngUsh"
enterprising little State from the Portuguese in 1656 ; but it had
* She lived to receive the C.M.S. Deputation to the Colonies in 1892,
and died, honoured and revered by all, in 1896, aged 95|. Her husband waa
the first Bishop of Waiapu, and her son the third.
2l6
" Insular Missions " ,
Chap. 16.
Part III. lately (1796) been conquered by England. The Dutch, as men-
1812-24. tioned in a former chapter,''' had forced Protestant Christianity
upon the people, by subjecting Buddhists, Hindus, and Eomanists
alike to heavy civil disabilities ; but they had honestly en-
deavoured to provide religious ministrations for them, building
churches and supporting clergy and schoolmasters. The British,
of course, restored religious liberty ; and though the first governor
did seek to continue the official patronage of religion, this policy
was soon abandoned. The people quickly perceived that their
new rulers cared little what religion prevailed ; and whereas in
1801 there were 342,000 Singhalese and 136,000 Tamils who
professed Protestant Christianity, in ten years more than half of
these had gone back to Buddhism or the Tamil devil-worship.
" Government religion " had been thrown off, and the Dutch
churches were going to ruin. The Society, however, was thinking
of Cej'lon before these apostasies occurred, and regarded it as a
specially hopeful field. Moreover, there was no East India
Company there to exclude or expel missionaries. The British
authorities, indeed, were fairly favourable. But Africa presently
filled all the field of vision, and Ceylon disappeared for a time
from view.
In 1810-11, two circumstances brought Ceylon once more
prominently before the Society. One was the publication of
Buchanan's Christian Bcsearchcs in the East, which within two
years ran through twelve editions, and which gave much informa-
tion about Ceylon. The other was the presence in England of
the Chief Justice of the Island, Sir Alexander Johnston, an
admii'able Christian man, who had on his own account employed
two Singhalese men to translate Bishop Porteus's work on the
Evidences of Christianity, and who earnestly pressed the claims
of the comparatively new British possession upon the sympathy of
Christian England. On his return to Ceylon, he caused the first;
number of the Missionary Begister (January, 1813) to be translated
into Singhalese, Tamil, and Portuguese, for circulation in the
Island ; and he wrote to Pratt proposing a Church Missionary
Association there, and the sending of suitable native youths to
England for training. This latter plan was forestalled by the
Society resolving to send out missionaries ; and it will be remem-
bered that the first two English candidates for whom ordination
had been procured. Greenwood and Norton, were at first designated
to Ceylon, and only diverted to India after they had actually
sailed.
Not till 1817 were there men actually available. But in that
year the first four were sent forth, Samuel Lambrick, Eobert
Mayor,! Benjamin Ward, and Joseph Knight. Lambrick was a
* See p. 56.
t Mayor married Charlotte Bickersteth, sister of the C.M.S. Secretary,
and was the father of the three distinguished brothers Mayor, of St. John's,
Cambridge, one of whom became Latin Professor.
Sir A.
Johnston.
First mis-
sionaries
to Ceylon.
New Zealand^ Ceylon^ West Indies^ Malta 217
man in middle life, who had been a tutor at Eton, and was probably Part III.
the most mature person yet engaged by the Society. They were 1812-24.
all ordained by Bishop Eyder of Gloucester. This was the first *^^^16.
occasion of sending out four clergymen at once to one Mission,
and many years elapsed before the Committee were able to take a
similar step. They were heartily welcomed, not only by Sir A.
Johnston, but also by the Governor, Sir Eobert Brownrigg. It is
very interesting to observe in the early Eeports how frequently the
Colonial Governors are mentioned as heartily co-operating with
Missionary Societies. Sir E. Brownrigg, when he left Ceylon in
1820, referred in a public speech to his action in this respect.
" The chief ends I have had in view," he said, " were the happiness
of the people confided to my care, and the honour of my own
country, to which I was responsible for the sacred trust." On
these accounts, therefore, and not merely because of his personal
faith in Christianity, he felt it his " bounden duty to foster and
encovirage " Missions.'''
It was by Sir E. Brownrigg's advice that the old hill capital, .
Kandy, was occupied by Lambrick. The Kandyans were a Kandy.
singularly vigorous race, and had maintained their independence
all thi^ough the Portuguese and Dutch periods ; and it was with
difficulty, and after the destruction of one detachment of troops
sent against them, that the British succeeded in subduing them,
in 1815. Two years later, a formidable rebellion broke out, but it
was quelled just before the missionaries arrived, and the Governor
wished one of them to go there at once. The possession of the
famous rehc called " Buddlia's Tooth" by the chief Buddhist
Temple at Kandy added to the importance of the place, as
pilgrims from all parts resorted to it. Two other stations were
opened at the same time : Baddegama in the southern Singhalese
country, and Nellore, in the Jaffna Peninsula, at the north end of
the Island, a densely-populated Tamil district. Four years later,
Lambrick removed to the village of Cotta, in the plain, six miles
from Colombo, which has been an important centre ever since.
Bishop Heber visited Ceylon in 1825, and was exceedingly Heber in
pleased with all he saw. " The Church missionaries in this '^^y'""-
island," he wrote, " are really patterns of what missionaries ought
to be — zealous, discreet, orderly, and most active." f It is a
curious illustration of the times that his advice was asked by
the brethren as to the propriety or otherwise of their meeting
the missionaries of other denominations in periodical gatherings
for Bible-study, conference, and prayer ; and that so good and
large-hearted a man as Heber, while " not thinking it necessary to
advise their cessation, now that they were established," did feel
it necessary to request the chaplains and such other of the
clergy as were not missionaries to abstain from attending them,
* Misi:ionarii Rejifiter, 1821, p. 71.
t Dr. G. Smith's Bisltop Heher, p. 286.
2 1 8 " Ins ul a r Missions ' ' ;
Part III. and did also feel it necessary to suggest restrictions as to the
1812-24. part laymen might take in them : —
Chap. 16.
" With no feeling of disrespect or suspicion towards the excellent
laymen who have joined you, I would recommend, if my counsel has
any weight (and I ofler it as my counsel only), that, though there is no
impropriety in their taking their turns in reading the Scriptures, and
mingling in the discussions which arise on the suhjects connected with
your conference, they would abstain from leading in prayer, except when
the meeting is held in one of their own houses, and when, as master of
the family, they may consistently offer up what will then be their family
devotion."'
hlrd°fiefd "^h® Society had expected Ceylon to be an easily fruitful field ;
but the opposite proved to be the case. One of the missionaries
wrote in 1868, reviewing the past history : '■'■ —
" A more arduous task, a more trying field of labour, it would be difli-
c\dt to imagine. It is a matter well luiderstood by planters, that while
the primeval forest land, if cleared and planted, will soon yield them
a rich return, the chenas of the lower ranges, previously exhausted by
native cultivation, though far more easy of access, and requiring far less
outlay at the beginning, will too often mock their hopes, and can only be
made to yield "a return at last, by a long and expensive mode of
cultivation. This fact has its counterpart in spiritual husbandry. . . .
Pure Buddliists and Hindus are tenfold more accessible than the
thousands of relapsed and false professors of Christianity. . . . The
traditions preserved in native families of the fact that their forefathers
were once Christians and afterwards returned to Buddhism, is naturally
regarded by them as a proof of the superiority of the latter religion ;
whilst tlie sight of clnu'ches, built by the Dutch but now gone to ruin,
adds strengtli to the belief that Christianity is an upstart religion, which
has no vitahty, and which, if unsupported by the ruling powers, cannot
stand before their own venerated system."
And in few Missions did the progress prove slower, for many
years, than in Ceylon. But a brighter day afterwards dawned ;
and though the work has never produced startling results, no
Mission has had year by year to tell of more manifest tokens of
Divine grace in individual hearts and lives.
West Indies.
When the " Society for Missions in Africa and the East " was
founded, there was evidently no thought of extending its opera-
West tions to the West. The sympathy of the leaders, however, with
ij^djan^^ the Negro race, and especially with th-e Negro Slaves, could not
fail to reach to the British possessions in the West India Islands,
in which so many thousands of Negroes were still the slaves of
English planters. But the call thither came in an unlooked-for
way. As before explained, it was not the practice of the Com-
mittee to take a map of the world, and put their fingers upon
particular regions to which they would like to send missionaries.
* Jubilee Sketches of the C.M.S. Ceylon Mission.
Negroes.
New Zealand^ Ceylon^ West Indies^ Malta 2iq
Tlieve was alwavs an invitation or other external reason for Part HI.
going in this or that direction. This was what has been always (j,^.Jj^-[e
regarded as Providential Leading. It was so with the West 1__
In^lies. Mr. William Dawes, who had been Governor of Sierra
Leone, and afterwards a member of the Committee, went, in 1813,
to live in the Island of Antigua, and offered to act as an
honorary lay " catechist " to snch Negroes as he could reach.
His proposal was cordially accepted, and although his name does
not appear on the Society's roll, he really did effective missionary
work for some years — much as the India chaplains did. He
instituted both day-schools and Sunday-schools, and the Society
granted him money for teachers. An officer in the Eoyal
Artillery, too. Lieutenant E. Lugger, who was quartered at
Barbadoes, started schools, assisted by the Society, in that
Island, and the scheme was afterwards extended to St. Vincent
and Dominica. In 1820, more than two thousand Negro children
were under instruction. The Committee also sent a clergyman
who had offered to the Society to Hayti, as a chaplain. Meanwhile,
the S.P.G. held the Codrington Estate in Barbadoes in trust, and
employed a chaplain to instruct the slaves engaged upon it.
The work of other Missions will appear by-and-by.
British Honduras, although on the mainland of Central Honduras.
America, may be regarded as a part of the West Indies, and
therefore must be mentioned here. At the invitation of the
English chaplain there, Mr. Armstrong, the Society, in 1818,
sent a second chaplain, a schoolmaster, and a printer, for the
purpose of establishing a Mission among the Mosquito Indians,
who appeared to be particularly accessible to Christian instruc-
tion. But the second chaplain returned invalided, and the
work was never prosecuted with effect, although for three or four
years Honduras held its place in the Society's Eeports.
The Committee rejoiced when two Bishops were sent to the
West Indies in 1824, to preside over the new dioceses of
Jamaica and Barbadoes; and at a later period important work
was undertaken in the former jurisdiction.
Malta.
How Malta came to be occupied, and with what purposes, wall
appear in the next chapter. Here it need only be ol)servcd that
the Committee regarded the little Island as a convenient base Maita^as^
for extending operations in all directions. " From this com- centre,
manding station. Christians have easy access, in their efforts to
raise and propagate the Faith, to important portions of the
Three Continents of the Old World, by a line of coast equal in
extent to half the circumference of the Globe." The access to
Africa from the INIediterranean was especially prominent in their
thoughts. Thev looked at Egypt, pitying the oppressed Coptic
Church, and trusting that " while the Pyramid and the Temple
had excited enthusiasm and animated research, Christian zeal
220 " Ins ular Missions ' ' ; Ne iv Zba land, Ce yl on, &= c.
Part III. would not be found deficient in giving aid to that Church whose
1812-24. country afforded protection to our . Infant Saviour, and whose
Chap. 16. shrines were consecrated by the labours of a Cyril and an
Athanasius." And they looked at the Barbary States, and
joyfully anticipated the day when " the northern shores of Afi'ica,
and all the other coasts of these magnificent inland seas " should
* ' feel the reviving influence of that Sacred Light which once shone
upon them with distinguished splendour." And they did not
confine themselves to rhetoric. Scores of pages in the volumes of
the Missionary Begister at this time are filled with important
information regarding North Africa and the Levant generally.
Prom the Malta Press went forth thousands of Christian tracts and
portions of Scripture to every accessible North African port. And
from Malta started the Mission to Abyssinia, which ultimately led
the Society to Eastern Equatorial Africa.
CHAPTER XVII.
The Eastern Churches: Efforts to Bevive Them.
The Committee's Eyes upon the East — An Appeal from Malta —
William Jowett— C.M.S. Policy with the Eastern Churches— The
Bible for the Eastern Churches — Promising Beginnings — Turkish
Atrocities — The Syrian Church of Travancore — Buchanan and
Colonel Monro — C.M.S. Designs — Fenn, Bailey, Baker.
" He that hath an ear, let him hear tchat the Sioirit saith imto the Churches."
—Rev. ii. 7, 11, 17, 29 ; iii. 6, 13, 22.
'HE energy with which the young Society was now being Part III.
conducted led to many plans being proposed to the 1812-24.
Committee for development in different directions ; and ^^P' '
the extraordinary breadth both of knowledge and of
sympathy which Josiah Pratt displayed in the 3Iission-
ary Register — to w^hich there is really no parallel at all in the present
day — naturally induced a belief that the Society could be used for
almost any good purpose at home or abroad. Among the sugges- c.M.s.not
tions made to the Committee repeatedly by various friends was that clthoi^^"
" clergymen of learning, intelligence, and piety " should be stationed countries,
at various Continental cities, particularly in Italy. The idea was
not to try and add to the number of Protestant communions
abroad ; not necessarily to encourage open secession from the Roman
Church. But it was thought that there must be many godly
individuals in that Church who would welcome more Scriptural
and truly Primitive teaching, and that gradually a reforming
movement might be set on foot within the Italian and Spanish
and Galilean Churches themselves. " Frequent and strong repre-
sentations," the Committee say in the Report of 1818, were
made to them as to the good which might thus be done. It did
not appear to them, however, that this was the proper work of the
Church Missionary Society. That work, they said, was " to com-
municate the knowledge of Christianity to such as did not possess
it." Still, there was a way in which they were willing to help.
Though their funds, they felt, were not applicable to such projects,
their "knowledge and influence" might be rightly used in
" reviving and diffusing Christianity \\\ any of the Churches
alDroad," — not only in the Roman Church, but in the too rational-
istic Protestant Churches, such as those of Germany, Switzerland,
Holland, &c. They were disposed, accordingly, to "render advice
Churches ?
222 The Eastern Churches : Efeorts to Revive Them
Part III. and assistance to suitable clergymen, willing to proceed to places
] 812-24. where they were likely to be useful." Apparently, they had no
Chap. 17. opportunity of fulfilling this promise, because no suitable clergy-
men came forward.
,,,. f But it was different with the Churches of the East. The
Why lor . ....
Eastern Socicty did enter upon an important enterprise with a view to
their possible revival. Where lay the difference ? It lay in this,
that the revival of the Eastern Churches would undoubtedly have
an effect on the Mohammedan and Heathen World. " It has not
appeared," says the same Eeport, "conformable to the direct
design of the Society to expend any part of its funds on Christian
Countries, otherwise than with ilie ultimate vieio of ivinning,
through them, the Heathen to the reception of the Gospel." Long
before this, indeed, their eyes had rested with peculiar interest
on the sacred regions of the East, It was humiliating that in
the lands in which the Incarnate Son of God lived and died,
in which Apostles laboured, from which the Gospel had first
sounded out, a fanatical and yet sterile religion like Islam, the
enemy of all enlightenment, the bar to all progress, should be
dominant. Yet the Eastern Churches, so far from being effective
instruments for winning the Mohammedans to Christ, were, and
still are — regretfully as it must be said, — a real obstacle to their
evangelization. " We have lived," they say, " among Christians
for twelve hundred years, and we want no such religion as that."
And it must indeed be sorrowfully acknowledged that the ignorance
and superstition prevailing among the Oriental Christians go far to
justify such a remark.
As far back as 1802, a Bristol friend had written to the young
Society, — " Would it not be an object well worthy the attention of
your Missionary Society, to attempt the revival of Spiritual and
Evangelical Eeligion in the Greek Church ? " In the next Annual
Eeport, this proposal is just mentioned, but merely as one of
several suggestions of possible missionary enterprises, and without
any expression of the Committee's wish to adopt it. A few years
later, Claudius Buchanan, whose Christian Researches in the East,
describing his travels in India and Ceylon, had excited so much
interest, was contemplating a journey to the Levant, no doubt
with a similar oloject. His book had revealed to Christian
England the existence of the ancient Syrian Church in Travancore.
Another book, had he taken this proposed journey, would doubtless
have told with equal sympathy of the oppressed Churches of
Greece, Asiatic Turkey, and Egypt. He did not go, however.
Perhaps the then urgent question of the opening of India kept
him in England. The actual proposal which ultimately led to the
Society's enterprises in the Mediterranean, came, strange to say,
from a Eoman Catholic.
Two English friends of the Society had been visiting Malta, and
had made the acquaintance there of Dr. Cleardo Naudi. From
them, no doubt, he heard of the new Missionary Society of the
The Eastern Churches: Efforts to Revive Them iix
Chm-ch of England ; and in June, 1811, he addressed a letter to Part III.
Pratt/'' In this curious document, he calls attention to " the 1H12-24.
multitudes of Christians of different denominations in the Levant '"^'" '■
[i.e. the various Oriental Cliurches] "living mingled in confusion Appeal
with the Turkish inhabitants." Prior to the War, he says, the ^"Jl^g^gg
Boman Congregation De Propaganda Fide frequently sent Romanist,
missionaries to these " ignorant Christians " ; but that Institution
being " now no more — its property sold — its revenues usurped and
diverted," they were " deprived of the true hght of the Gospel."
There were still, it was true, some " Fathers of St. Francis" in
Egypt, but, it was " much to be lamented," they were "very ill-
informed." " It now, therefore," he goes on, " devolves upon
you to enter on this labour of propagating the Clu'istian Faith
among Intidels, and of confirming it among the Ignorant." And
he appeals for missionaries of the English Church who would
" accommodate themselves to Eastern customs in respect of
manners, dress, &c.," and learn Arabic and Modern Greek.
It is surely a curious spectacle. Evidently the good doctor
was a truly pious man. To him Eastern Christendom was
heretical, and should be enlightened by Western Christendom.
Rome was no doubt the chief representative of Western Christen-
dom ; but if she failed, the English Church, as an independent
Branch, was quite qualified to teach the East. It is remarkable
also that he quotes a Greek deacon who had observed to him that
" the institution of the Bible Society of England must have taken
place by heavenly inspiration " !
The Committee responded warmly. In the Report read at the Attitude
Anniversary of 1812, they invited " zealous young clergymen " to com-'^'^'
come forward and be " the honoured instruments of confirming mittee.
and propagating the doctrine of the Cross in countries dear to
them as scholars from classical associations, and more dear to
them as Christians from sacred." It is a striking coincidence
that on the very day on which they had received Dr. Naudi's
letter, they had also before them one from Melville Home, calling
attention to Buchanan's account of the Syrian Church of Malal)ar,
and urging them to send a Mission for its enlightenment ; and in
the same Annual Report of 1812, they dwelt upon this call also.
In addition to which, the Abyssinian Church, and Egypt, and
Arabia, and Persia were all referred to ; and the Committee
expressed their longing for another Pentecost when " Parthians
and iNIedes and Elamites, and tiie dwellers in Mesopotamia, and
in Judiea — in Egypt — and Arabians " would "speak in their own
tongues the wonderful works of God." In the following year, they
enlarged further ; and the paragraph is interesting as showing what
was thought at that time of the prospects of the Papacy : —
" The Coininitteo feel deeply impressed with the conviction that Malta
has not been ijlaced in our hands merely for the extension and security
* Printed in the Appendix to the Keport of 1812. *
224 The E astern Churches : Efforts to Revive Them
Part III. of our political greatness. The course of Divine Providence seems
1812-24. plainly to indicate that the United Church of England and Ireland is
Chap. 17. called to the discharge of an important duty there. The Romish Church
is manifestly in a state of gradual but rapid dissolution. Its scattered
members ought to be collected. "Wliat Church is to collect them ? The
prevailmg form of worship in the East almost miiversally, and in the
rest of the world generally, is episcopal. "U'as ever such an opportunity
pr jsented for extending Christianity in that primitive form of its
discipline which is established in the United Empire ? "
Encoiu-aged by the Society's response, Dr. Naudi came to
England, and laid before the Committee proposals for sending
them t^o or three Maltese or Greeks or Itahans for English
education and ordination. On being sho^vn the Thirty-Nine
Articles and the Oath of Supremacy, which candidates for EngUsh
orders must accept, he expressed his behef that they would be no
obstacle. The Committee approved of this plan; but nothing
seems to have come of it. They appointed Naudi, however, the
Society's correspondent at Malta ; and they proposed to a young
Cambridge man, the brother of Pratt's wife, to go out to the
Mediterranean as " Literary Eepresentative," to inquh'e into the
state of rehgion in the Levant, and to suggest methods for
translating and cu'culating the Scriptures, and other ways of
William influencing the Oriental Chm'ches. This was ^N'ilham Jowett,
jowett. gQj^ Qf John Jowett of Southwark, a gentleman who had been one
of the original members of the first Committee, but who had died
a few months after his appointment." William Jowett was
Twelfth Wrangler in 1810, and a Fellow of St. John's ; and he
had a curacv at Nottingham. In after years he was to become a
Secretary of the Society. He now accepted the proposed com-
mission, but could not go for two years.
We go foi-ward, therefore, to 1815. We enter No. 11 Sahsbury
Square. We find the Committee sitting, with the President, Lord
Gambler, in the chah-. The Cambridge Wrangler is present — the
first University graduate to go forth in the service of the Society.
It is a quiet " dismissal," not a pubhc meeting as when bands of
men for Africa and India had been taken leave of. But Josiah
Pratt rises, and reads, as Jowett's instructions, one of the most
important of aU the Society's early manifestoes.
His in- The Committee quite understood that they were not under-
structions, i-^king a Mission of the ordinaiy kind. Jowett's " high office as a
Minister of the Gospel and a Messenger of Di^-ine Mercy " might
have to be. "in its direct exercise, suspended for a time." His
task was (V) to collect information about the state of rehgion on
the shores of the Mediten-anean, and (2) to inquire as to the best
methods of " propagating Christian Knowledge." There was verj*
little known m England on these points. " The Classic, the
Painter, the Statuaiy, the Antiquarian, the Natm-ahst, the
* John Jowett's brother Benjamin was grandfather of Benjamin Jowett,
Master of Balliol.
The Eastern Churches: Eeeorts to Revive Them 225
Merchant, the Patriot, the Soldier, all," say the Committee, " have Part III.
their reporters ; but no one details to us the number and the if'^^ft"
characters of Christians ; no one has opened to us channels of ^^^'
communication with such men ; no one names the men who are
there, perhaps, in retirement sighing over the moral condition of
their coiintry, and calling, as Europe once called to Asia, Come
over and help us." '■•'• From Malta as a centre, Jowett is to survey
the religious horizon. First, he is to look at the Eoman Church, chfrstflnf
" Notice her condition — any favourable indications — the means of Moslems,'
communicating to her our privileges. You cannot act, under your ^nd jews,
circumstances, as a public impugner of her errors, nor as a
reformer of her practice ; I but you may watch, with a friendly
eye, to ascertain the best means of restoring her to primitive
health and vigour." Then he is to study the various Oriental
Churches, Greek, Jacobite or Syrian, Coptic, Abyssinian, Armenian,
Nestorian. Then the Mohammedans : " Carry your eye all round
the Sea, by its north-eastern, its eastern, its south-eastern, its
southern, and its south-western borders, and you behold the
triumphs of the False Prophet. Turkey presents itself as almost
begirding, directly or by its vassal states, this inland ocean." \
Then the Jews: "multitudes are scattered among the Moham-
medans, and no one has hitherto investigated the state of this
people." Nor are the Druses and other strange communities
omitted from the enumeration. Then as to methods of work :
Jowett is to visit and correspond with rulers and consuls and
ecclesiastics and travellers of all kinds ; to form, if possible, local
associations for distriliution of Scriptures (in fact, small Bible
Societies) ; to prepare for the establishment of a printing-press at
Malta ; to study the languages of the Levant, and to seek for
valuable ]\ISS. of the Scriptures in them. Then it is hoped that g"?^/^^"""
" some of the distinguished Prelates of our Church " would open churches,
a correspondence with the Patriarchs of Constantinople, Antioch,
and Alexandria, "so that through their influence our systems
of education might be communicated, and Bible Societies
established."
It was, indeed, to the Eastern Churches that the Society chiefly
looked for the future evangelization of the non-Christian popula-
tions in the neighbouring Asiatic and African countries. "As
these Churches," they said, " shall reflect the clear light of the
* A curious illustration of the ignorance here lamented is famished by the
insertion in the Mi.fsioiiarij Register (.June, 1818) of a quite elementary
account of the population and condition of .lerusalem, sent from Madras, being
derived from an Armenian bishop visiting India.
t Under the European Treaties which had confirmed the annexation of
Malta bv Groat Britain, the Maltese were to be left " undisturbed in their
faith." The Government therefore would not allow any evangelistic work
among them.
X At that time, of course, Greece and the (ireek Islands, Roumania
and Bulgaria and Serbia and Bosnia, and tVie whole of North Africa, owed
allegiance to Turkey.
VOL: I. Q
226 The Eastern Churches: Efforts to Rej^/ve Them
Part III. Gospel on the Mohammedans and Heathens around, they will
LSI 2-24.. doubtless become efficient instruments of rescuing them from
Chap. 17. delusion and death." And " it is by bringing back these Churches
to the knowledge and love of the sacred Scriptures, that the
blessing from on high maybe expected to descend on them." =••
Again, —
" The x'evival of the Greek Church, in its primitive purity and vigour,
should be an object of the affectionate exertions and earnest prayers of
all who wish the extension of Christianity in these regions. Enlightened
and animated by the free and amj^le circulation among them of the
Holy Scriptures, the Greeks — numerous, widely scattered, with a
cultivated language, and maintaining a ready intercourse among them-
selves and with others — will act most powerfully and beneficially on the
large masses of people among whom they live." f
Accordingly, these Churches were to be dealt with in a
moderate and conciliatory spirit. In the Instructions given to a
later band of missionaries, there is a striking passage illustrating
this : \—
" Study — for it is peculiarly applicable to the circumstances of an
enlightened and devout Christian labouring in the midst of a benighted
and corrupted Oriental Church — study that spirit of moderation, delicacy,
and caution, which was exhibited by the Apostles toward their country-
men the Jews, and toward their converts from among the Gentiles.
Although they acted, and spoke, and wrote under the immediate inspira-
tion of the Holy Ghost, and foreknew certainly the approaching
dissolution of the Jewish Polity, yet, in ritual observances, such as
Circumcision, Washings, the Change of the Sabbath, Fasts, Attendance
at the Temple and in the Synagogues, and generally in all the discipline
of the old covenant, which was waxing old and ready to vanish away,
they were temperate, conformable, conciliatory, and large-hearted.
They were, especially, backward to dispute, excepting when ceremonial
observances were abused to disparage the doctrine of free justitication
by faith in Christ, or substituted for the inward sanctification of the
heart by the operation of the Holy Spirit. Imitate them, by continually
insisting, in the simplest and most practical manner, on the two cardinal
doctrines of the Gospel, Justification and Sanctification ; and waive as
much as possible, those contentions which are unprofitable and vain."
And again, on another occasion, Jowett was cautioned about
proselytism : —
" The eternal salvation of the souls of men is the grand object of our
hopes and cares. . . . But a difficulty arises here, so far as our coiu-se
lies among those who are already outwardly members of Christian
Churches. Whenever the member of a Cluu-ch which holds the main
truths of the Gospel, though with a great mixture of error, discerns that
error, he is perhaps disposed to break away from its Communion. It
requires much wisdom, candour, and fidelity, to guide the conscience
aright in such cases."
And the Committee go on to distinguish between the Eoman
Church and the Churches of the East : —
" The Roman Catholic Church is entangled in a snare from which it
* Kej ort, 1820. f Report, 1819. % Eeporfc, 1829, p. 142.
The Eastern C/fUECHEs: Efeorts to Revive Them 227
cannot be freed, while it holds the Infallibility and Universal Headship Part III
of the liisliop of Rome. The Greek, Armenian, Syrian, Coptic, and l«12-24.'
Abyssnnan ("liurches, t]iou«r]i in many points far gone from the simplicity Chap. 17.
and purity of the truth, are not so entangled ; and also possess within
themselves the principle and the means of reformation." *
At first, the enterpri?,e gave high promise of success. Jowett Bright
went forth, and, after him, the first two Oxford men enrolled hy ^'°^'^^^^^-
the Society, James Connor, Scholar of Lincoln, and John Hartley
of St. Edmund Hall. They travelled to Egypt, Syria, Turkey,
the Greek Islands, at a time when such journeys were almost as
difficult and fatiguing as in the time of St. Paul ; for example, on
one occasion the voyage from Malta to Constantinople occupied
sixty-nine days ! Sometimes they were in quarantine for weeks,
as the plague continually raged in the Levant. A printing-press Malta
was estahhshed at Malta, which at one time (rather later, 1827) ^'■^^^•
was under the charge of John Kitto, the deaf but learned 'mason
who afterwards did so much to popularise the best results of
Biblical study and Oriental research.! This press sent forth
Scriptures and tracts by the thousand in Maltese, Itahan, Modern
Greek, and Arabic. Some of them were written by Dr. Naudi,
and it is interesting to find an enlightened Eoman Catholic— for
he does not seem to have left his Church — writing tracts on the
importance of the Scriptures being read by the people at large.
Some of them consisted of extracts from the Greek Fathers,
translated into Modern Greek. Maltese, however, was especially
studied, as an introduction to Arabic ; and a large part of the
Bible was produced in it. It was observed that in the Greek
churches, the Old Testament was read in the Septuagint version,
and the New in the original Greek ; in the Coptic churches, in
Coptic ; in the Syrian churches, in Syriac ; in the Abyssinian
churches, in Ethiopic ; and generally, read from old MSS ; but
that none of these ecclesiastical languages were " understanded of
the people," nor did even the priests often possess printed copies.
The Society, therefore, in conjunction with the Bible Society,
published editions of the Scriptures in these languages for the use
of the priests and others who could read them. The ol)ject was
" the enlightenment and elevation of the priests of the respective
Conmumions by Scripture Truth and Charity," in order that,
" by their means, translations might be made into the Vernaculars
for the use of the people, and for the conversion of the Heathen
around them." In two cases the Society was itself instrumental
in getting important vernacular versions into circulation. First, a
Greek Archimandrite at Constantinople, named Ililarion (after-
wards an Archbishop in Bulgaria), undertook a version of ihe New
Testament in :\Iodern Greek, which was duly published. Secondly,
a translation of the Ethiopic Bible of the Abvssinian Church had
been made a few years before by an aged monk named Abu Rumi,
* Missio7tary Register, 1829, p. 407.
t Whose son is Prebendary Kitto, Hector of .^^t. Martin-in-tho-Fieldg
Q 2
228 The Eastern Churches: Efforts to Revive Them
Part III. under the direction of the French Consul at Cairo, M. Assehn de
1812-24. Cherville. The MS., consisting of no less than 9539 pages in
' ' ^" the Amharic language and character (the Abyssinian vernacular),
all written out by xA.bu Eumi, was lighted on by Jowett, and, after
some negotiation, purchased for the Bible Society; and portions of
it were printed, many thousands of copies of which were afterwards
circulated by C.M.S. missionaries in Abyssinia.'''
The intercourse which the " Litei-ary Eepresentatives " had
with the Eastern bishops and priests was very hopeful. The
Welcome Bishop of Smyrna, the Bishop of Scio (" a truly learned man "),
Eastern the Professors at the great Greek College at Scio, and leading
Bishops, priests and doctors at Athens, Milo, Zante, &c., gave Jowett a
warm welcome on his very first journey. When he visited
Egypt, the Coptic Patriarch granted him letters to the principal
priests and convents. Mr. Connor was received with equal
warmth by the Greek Patriarchs of Constantinople and Jerusalem,
the Greek Archbishops and many Bishops in Crete, Ehodes, and
Cyprus ; and the Syrian and Armenian Patriarchs and Bishops
in Syria and Palestine. The two brethren, indeed, saw quite
enough to make them, as Jowett significantly says, lift up their
hearts to God with the cry, " That it may please Thee to
illuminate all Bishops, Priests, and Deacons, with true knowledge
and understanding of Thy word ! " — but many of the most influen-
tial ecclesiastics entered heartily into the plan of forming local
^■'^l^^. Bible Societies, and circulating Vernacular Versions ; and several
such societies were actually formed, at Malta, Smyrna, Athens,
and Corfu and other Ionian Islands. Apparently the only obstacle
was fear of the Turks taking alarm, and withdrawing some of
the small amount of religious liberty then allowed to the oppressed
Christians. Even where no regular organization was formed, the
Patriarchs and Bishops frequently fostered plans for the circula-
tion of the Versions. The Eev. Eobert Pinkerton, Agent on the Con-
tinent for the British and Foreign Bible Society, a very able man,
came south at this time, and took an active part in the work. Mr.
Henry Drummond, afterwards so well known by his connexion
with Edward Irving, also fostered these local plans and associa-
tions, employing for the purpose an agent named Christopher
Burckhardt (not to be confounded with the famous traveller of
that name). " His idea of a Bible Society," writes Jowett, " is
very simple. It is two or three people sitting down together,
signing a set of rules, and then saying, ' We are the Bible Society
of • ,' and immediately acting as such. The only objection to
this system is its want of appearance in the eyes of its neighbours :
which, however, is in some degree its security." This is the true
way of forming almost any society !
The spirit of inquiry thus awakened in the East led one
* The revision of this Version for the Bible Society was one of the tnsks
of the East African missionary Krapf, in his old age, .and it was finished only
in 1879, and printed at the St. Crischona Mission Press, near Basle.
The Eastern Churches: Efforts to Revive Them 229
ecclesiastic, th^ Archbishop of Jerusalem in one of the three Part III.
branches of the Syrian Jacobite Church, to visit Europe, in order i?^^"^'
to obtain help towards printing the Scriptures in the particular ^P'
form in which his people could read them, i.e. in the Arabic An Eastern
language printed in Syriac characters. He applied to Eome and bishop in
Paris in vain, and then came on to London. He was warmly England,
received l)y the C.M.S. Committee, and a special fund was
opened, not by the Society itself, but l)y its friends independently,
in aid of his scheme, of which Professor Macbride of Oxford and
Professor Lee of Cambridge were Secretaries. The Archbishop
was taken leave of at a large public meeting at Freemason's Hall,
presided over by Lord Teignmouth.
In 1820, Jowett came to England for a few months, and brought
out a valuable work. Christian Besearches in the Mediterranean,
on the plan of Buchanan's previous book on the Further East ;
and so great was the interest aroused by his accounts of the Lands
so dear to Christian hearts, that he was, at the age of thirty-four,
appointed to preach the Annual C.M.S. Sermon. (Has there ever jowetfs
again been a preacher of it so young?) His text was admirable : s^'''"°"-
" He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the
Churches." The ancient Churches of Ephesus and Pergamos and
Thyatira and Sardis and Laodicea were, in their respective
distinguishing features, abundantly represented in the Oriental
Christendom of the Nineteenth Century ; and there were not
wanting, here and there, Chin'ches in some degree worthy to
represent even Smyrna and Philadelpliia. In this excellent sermon,
Jowett did not view the Eastern Christians merely as objects of
interest and symj^athy. He saw that they ought to be the
evangelists of the Moslem world. But for this they were not yet
qualified. " They believe in Christianity ; but the grounds of
their belief are not such as would persuade unbelieving nations.
Christianity is upheld chiefly by Custom and by Authority ; and
not unfrequently, by belief in idle legends and lying wonders."
Therefore they must be familiarised with the Scriptures, and
taught the Historical Evidences of the Faith. And the enterprise
of enlightening the Oriental Churches was to be regarded only as
a preparatory work. Jowett's ardent hopes looked forward to
" the conversion of the Mohammedan Provinces which encompass
two-thirds of the Mediterranean, the recovery of the Jews to their
true Messiah, and eventually the evangelizing of all the dark and
unknown regions of Interior Africa."
These far-reaching hopes were not damped by the sad and
untoward events that innnediately ensued in the East. On
Monday: April 30th, 1821, Jowett preached his sermon. On the
verv Sundav followin<r, May 6th, a terrible outbreak of Moham- ^^^Jbreak
1 r " ■ ■ n i /^i -1 mi i i °i Moham-
medan tanaticism occurred at Oonstantmople. ine veneral)le medan
Patriarch of the Greek Church, who had so lieartily thrown bigotry.
himself into the work of Bible translation and distribution, was
attacked by a Turkish mob while performing divine worship, and
2^o The Eastern Churches : Efforts lo Revive Them
Part III,
1812-24.
Chap. 17.
Massacre
of Scio.
Turkey
and
Russia.
The Pope
and the
Sultan.
dragged to a cruel and ignominious death. Other bishops and
priests were killed ; and the outrage was followed by others not
less barbarous in many parts of the Turkish Empire. In par-
ticular, the frightful massacre at Scio horrified all Europe — a
rehearsal, one may say, of the Bulgarian and Armenian atrocities
of later years. The city of Scio was sacked ; the great College,
the headquarters of Greek learning, the churches, the hospitals,
the houses, were all destroyed, and the valuable libraries burnt ;
and thousands of the people were mercilessly slaughtered. These
outrages led to the Greek War of Independence ; and thus began
the gradual dismemberment of Turkey. Christian Englishmen at
that time little thought that the Ottoman Empire would last
through the century ; they would have been shocked at the idea
of British blood and treasure being expended in the hopeless
attempt to prop it up ; by them, and by their fathers for several
centuries, the Turk had been ever looked upon as the relentless
foe of Christendom ; the Poles who had hurled him back from the
gates of Vienna, and the Greeks who now rose against him, were
the heroes of those days. The advance of Russia, if anticipated
at all, was anticipated with pleasure and hope. Several Russian
Bil^le Societies had been established, and were doing splendid
work. In the Missionary Register of December, 1817, there are
speeches reported of the Archbishops of Moscow and Tobolsk,
delivered at meetings of the societies of those cities. The Czar
Alexander himself was the ardent promoter of Bible and missionary
enterprise, and the personal friend of the Gurneys and Frys and
other leaders of philanthropy in England. Russia was looked to
as the ally of all that was good ; Turkey, as almost the em-
bodiment of evil. In a powerful Introduction to the Missionary
Register of 1823, Josiah Pratt enlarged on the subject. " The
stronghold of the Mohammedan Antichrist," he wrote, " is shaken
to its foundations." Recent events were " all additional symptoms
of the approach of that Ruin which has long been preparing for
this main support of the delusions of the False Prophet — delusions
by which the god of this world has for twelve centuries blinded
the eyes and besotted the hearts of countless millions of
mankind."
But, for the time, the growing work of Bible and tract circula-
tion was greatly impeded. In a previous chapter,'-' the Papal
Bull of 1817 against the Bible Society was noticed. In 1824, a
new Pope issued a Circular warning Catholics against its transla-
tions— although the Bible Society, with great wisdom, circulated
in Roman Catholic countries the vernacular versions made by
Roman divines themselves. In like manner, the Sultan, as
Commander of the Faithful, immediately after the issue of that
Circular, put forth a Firman forbidding the import of any Christian
Scriptures into the Turkish dominions, and ordering copies to be
See p. 153.
The Eastern Churches: Efforts to Revive Them 231
burnt. Thus, wrote Pratt, " the Eastern Antichrist co-operates Part III.
with the Western ! "—and the co-operation was perhaps closer ^j^^^"^"*-
than the pubhc reahzed, for the opinion of some of the British '_^ "•
Consuls, and of leading Eomanists in the East themselves, was
that Eomish influence was at the bottom of even the Sultan's
action, seeing that Papal missionaries were in no way interfered
with. No one at that time would have thought Pratt narrow-
minded for stigmatizing the Papacy as the Western Antichrist.
Bishops and divines beyond all suspicion of Evangehcalism
habitually did so then.
Jowett continued at Malta till 1830, and Hartley made interest-
ing tours in Asia Minor, and in the Ionian Islands ; but from 1825
onwards the Society's efforts were chiefly concentrated on Egypt
and Abyssinia, and the missionaries were all Germans or Swiss
from the Basle Seminary. Other missionaries from the sarne
institution, however, worked at Smyrna and Syra. But all this
belongs to a later period in our History. The nett result of the
enterprise for the revival of the Eastern Churches was, un-
doubtedly, that Oriental Christendom, though according manifest
respect to the good men living in its midst, and wilHng to use the
pubhcations of the Malta Press, was by no means inclined to be
quickened into fresh life by the Christendom of the West.
The Malabar Syrian Church.
There is another Oriental Church for the revival of which, at Syrian
this period, the Society made earnest efforts. From the earliest ^^^H^]" '"
centuries, Christianity had taken root in South-West India ; and
when Vasco da Gama, the Portuguese navigator, reached India
by sea round the Cape in 1498, he found flourishing a Nestorian
Church, which, though not free from errors and superstitions,
knew nothing of the Papacy, the cultus of the Virgin Mary, or
Transubstantiation. An army of Portuguese priests followed, and
in many places the Indian Christians submitted to the yoke of
Eome. In 1511 came Xavier ; and at Goa he found visible signs
of Portuguese Christianity in the shape of "a magnificent
cathedral, a resident bishop, a chapter of canons, a Franciscan
convent," &c. The ancient Church, however, did not submit to
Eome till 1599, when Menezes, Archbishop of Goa, by an
unscrupulous use of both force and fraud, secured its subjection
at the Synod of Udiampura. All the married priests were de-
posed ; the doctrine of transubstantiation and the worship of the
Virgin were enforced ; and the Inquisition was established. But
when the Dutch dispossessed the Portuguese of certain ports on
the Malabar coast in 1663, they made way for a Syrian Metro-
politan to come from Antioch, who was welcomed by the majority
of the Christians as their liberator from Eoman tyranny ; and the
result was that the Church, instead of resuming its old Nestorian
connexion, became Jacobite, and has ever since looked to Antioch
232 The Eastern Churches: Efforts to Revive Them
Part III. as its ecclesiasticcal centre. -■= Hence the common name of Syrian
Ch-llr ^^'^^^^'^^^' f^l^ou^li tlie designation used locally is " Christians of St.
'^^'' '' Thomas." The majority of its members are in the protected
states of Travancore and Cochin ; and the Eomanists being also
numerous, those states have the largest proportion of Christians
in the population to be found in India.
Bucha- It was Claudius Buchanan who first drew public attention to
searches.' ^^"^ ancient Church. In his Christian Researches he gives a
graphic account of his visit to Travancore in 1806, and writes
enthusiastically of the Syrian Christians and their comparative
freedom from error. He brought to l^^ngland the famous Peschito
MS., now in the University Library at Cambridge, the only com-
plete ancient MS. of the Syriac Bible in Europe, except one at
Milan. In the Eeport of 1812, in which was propounded a com-
prehensive programme of missionary work in the East, evidently
inspired l)y Buchanan's book, the C.M.S. Committee say of "the
Syrian Christians of Malay ala " that " they have maintained a
regular Episcopal Succession from the earliest ages, and in all
important points accord with the faith of the Primitive Church " ;
and it is suggested that " a few learned, prudent, and zealous
clergymen would be received, as there is ground to hope, with
open arms by this venerable Church. Their labours," it is
added, " would tend, under the Divine blessing, to revive and
confirm the influence of the faith in that oppressed Community,
and might lead ultimately to a union between our Churches."
But the first practical step towards helping the Syrian Church
was taken by the British Eesident at the Hindu Court of Travan-
core. A previous Eesident, Colonel Macaulay, had welcomed and
Colonel aided Buchanan ; and now his successor. Colonel Monro, in 1813,
Monro. formed a plan for establishing a college for the education of the
Syrian clergy and laity, inducing the Hindu Eani (Princess) to
endow it with money and lands, and applying to Mr. Marmaduke
Thompson, the Madras chaplain, for a clergyman of the Church of
England to be Principal. In 1816, Thompson being now Secretary
of the C.M.S. Corresponding Committee at Madras, sent in
response two of the first missionaries who arrived from England,
fn°dBriiey. ^^^^^^^^^ Norton and Benjamin Bailey. This step met the hearty
■ approval of the Home Committee, who thereupon commissioned
their OrientaHst, Samuel Lee, at Cambridge (not yet Professor),
to write a sketch of the history of the INIalabar Church ; which he
did with his usual learning and thoroughness, and it was printed
as an appendix to the Eeport of 1817. Another missionary,
Dawson, who was sent in the following year, had soon to return
Baker and home invalided; but in 1818 arrived Henry Baker and Joseph
Fenn. Norton was stationed at Allepie, the energetic Eesident
obtaining from the Eani a grant of land for the Mission. Bailey,
* The best account of the Syrian Church, its history and doctrine and
liturgies, &c., is given in Lingerings of Light in a Darl; Land, l)y T. Whitehouse ;
London, 1873. Mi-. Whitehouse was a chaplain at Cocliin.
The Eastern Churches: Efforts to Revive Them 233
Baker, and Femi, the celebrated Travancore Triumvirate, settled at Part III.
Cottayam, where Colonel Munro's Syrian College had been estab- ^^'^'^^j
lished. Fenn had been a young London barrister, who gave up ^^^
brilliant prospects to be a missionary. Having good connexions,
and exhibiting unusual powers, he was already making £1500
a year. But he heard the Divine call, and responded at once ;
and he was ordained in the first instance to Francis Cunningham's
curacy at Pakefield. To him was more especially committed the
work of seeking to influence the Syrian Church.-
The missionaries were expressly instructed by the C.M.S. Com- '^j^^g^^-^j^_
mittee " not to pull down the ancient Church and build another, cernfng°an
but to remove the rubbish and repair the decaying places." " The ^^^^^^^
Syrians should be brought back to their own ancient and primitive
worship and discipline, rather than be induced to adopt the liturgy
and disciphne of the Enghsh Church ; and should any considera-
tions induce them to wish such a measure, it would be highly
expedient to dissuade them from adopting it, both for the
preservation of their individuahty and entireness, and greater
consequent weight and usefulness as a Church ; and to prevent
those jealousies and heart-burnings which would in all probability
hereafter arise."
At the first arrival of Norton, some apprehension was manifested
by the Metran (Metropolitan) and other Syrians that the English
clergy were coming, as the Eoman clergy had come, to subjugate
them to the domination of a foreign Church. " But I assured
them," wrote Norton, "that it was our sole desire to be instru-
mental, by the Divine assistance, in strengthening the Metran's
hands for removing those evils which they had derived from the
Church of Eome, and which he himself lamented, and to bring
them back to their primitive state, according to the purity of the
Gospel, that they might again become a holy and vigorous Church,
active and useful in the cause of God." The Metran thereupon
w^elcomed him as their " deliverer and protector." This Metran,
however, soon died ; but he was succeeded by two excellent men,
who were Metrans jointly, and who both proved most friendly,
and anxious to follow the counsels of the missionaries. On
December 3rd, 1818, an assembly was summoned by one of them.
Mar Dionysius, which was attended by forty catanars (priests)
and seven hundred of the laity, and at which Joseph Fenn
addressed them. He dwelt on the duties of both clergy and laity,
pointing out the evils of enforced celibacy for the former, and the
importance of conducting public worship in a language " under-
standed of the people"; and suggested the appointment of six
* An interesting account of Joseph Fenn, by Dr. J. C. Miller, appeared in
the CM. Intelligencer of May, 1878. He was for fifty years Minister of Black-
heath Park Chapel, and a venerated member of the C.M.S. Committee. He
was the father of several clerical sons: among them, C. C. Fenn, of Ceylon,
and afterwards Secretary of C.M.S.; David Fenn, of Madras; J. F. Fenn,
of Cheltenham ; T. F. Fenn, Head Master of Trent College.
234 The Eastern Churches: Efeorts to Revive Them
^fv^ ^}^' °^- ^^^® ™°^* ^^^^® catanars to consult with the Metran and the
Chaplt i^^ssionaries as to the purifying and simphfying of the rites and
1_ ■ ceremonies of the Church, which were extremely elaborate and
comphcated and in many respects superstitious,— adding the
caution that it was desirable to " alter as little as possible." ^=
Early Of course, it was not expected that reforms could be effected at
success o Qj-^gg . ^j^^j meanwhile the three brethren set to work in the various
aries. departments allotted to them. Fenn took charge of the College,
at which it was arranged that every candidate for the Syrian
ministry should be trained ; Bailey, having been two years longer
in Travancore than the others, and being therefore more advanced
in the language, began the translation of the Bible into Malayalam ;
and Baker started and supervised schools in Cottayam and the
surrounding villages. They quickly won the personal esteem of
the people ; and a remarkable letter f was written by the Metran
to the President of the Society, Lord Gambler, in 1821, in which,
comparing the Pope to Pharaoh, he called Colonel Macaulay,
(the first Resident), Moses, and Colonel Monro, Joshua; speaking
also affectionately of " Mar Buchanan, the illustrious priest," of
"Priest Benjamin, Priest Joseph, and Priest Henry" (Bailey,
Fenn, and Baker), and of " Samuel the Priest," i.e. Professor
Lee, who had written them a letter in the ancient Syriac language.
Bishop Middleton, of Calcutta, who visited Travancore just when
the work was beginning, approved of the missionaries' plans ; and
the Principal of Bishop's College, Dr. Mill, two years later, wrote
with surprise and pleasure of the judicious way in which, in his
But dis- j^^flgment, they were filling a very difficult position.
appointing For some years the reports were very hopeful ; and yet no
results. definite _ reform had been accomplished. The actual practice of
the Syrian Church proved to be far more superstitious than was
perceived at first. The clergy were ignorant and often immoral,
and the people given to drunkenness and Hcense of all kinds.
Many of the religious customs were simply borrowed from the
surrounding Heathenism. In respect both of religious observance
and of morality, the Christians had "mingled with the Heathen
and learned their works." But the missionaries noted this great
and fundamental difference between them, that while the Heathen
gloried — as they glory to-day — in their shame, and justified the
vilest practices by the example of their gods, the Christians
entirely acknowledged their own sin and degradation, and even the
superstitious character of their worship, and professed to wish for
improvement. Both the Residents and the missionaries urged the
marriage of the priests, the prohibition of which was no original
rule of the ancient Church of Antioch, but had been borrowed
* An abstract of this Address is given in the Appendix to the Report of
1820; in which also there is an official report by Colonel Monro to the
Madras Government on the history and condition of Christianity in Travan-
core.
t Printed in full in the Missionary Register of 1822, p. 131.
The Eastern Churches: Efforts to REinvE Them 235
from Eome. Celibacy, indeed, was held in high honour ; but in Part III.
actual fact there was very little real celibacy. Though the Wl^^-*-
priests had no lawful wives, they had mistresses, and children, ^^"^^" ^^'
quite openly ; so that marriage would have been an important
reform. But although the good Metrans did advocate it, very
little came of the proposal. Meanwhile, Fenn and Bailey went
on training the young priests and translating the Scriptures, and
attending the Syrian services regularly, although these were often
extremely distasteful to them.
In 1825 the good Metran, Mar Dionysius, died. His successors
proved to be men of a totally different spirit, and opposed all
reforms. For ten years more, nevertheless, the Society persevered ;
but, as will appear hereafter, the enterprise was at last acknow-
ledged to be a failure. To the Jews at Pisidian Antioch, in
the earliest days, St. Paul had said, " It was necessary that the
word of God should first have been spoken unto you : but seeing
ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting
life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles. ' So, in effect, said the mission-
aries to the Indian children of the Syrian Antioch. They now
turned to the Heathen. But this as viewed from 1825, is still in
the future.
CHAPTEE XVIII.
The Outlook after Twenty-five Years.
Josiah Pratt retires — Sombre Tone of his Last Report — Cunningham
on the Great Enemy — Discouragement and Repulse in the Mission
Field — Deaths — New Friends — The Anniversaries — Men and Means
— Ordinations — New N.-W. America Mission — The S.V.M.U.
Motto anticipated — The One Hope, an Outpouring of the Spirit.
"Much discouraged because of tit e ivay." — Numb. xxi. 4.
" But David encouraged himself in the Lord his God."- 1 Sam.
6.
Part III.
1812-24.
Chap. 18.
Josiah
Pratt
QUx\ETEE of a century had now passed since the
Httle l)and of obscure clergymen and laymen esta-
blished the new Society in the Castle and Falcon Inn.
We have traced the history of the Society's early
struggles, of its trials of faith and patience, of its
almost sudden leap, at the age of thirteen, from infancy to
vigorous youth, of its rapid extension throughout the country, of
its relations with other Societies, of its first Missions in West
Africa, in North and South India, in New Zealand, in Ceylon ; of
its efforts in behalf of the Eastern Churches. Let us now pause
for a moment at the year 1824, and survey the Society's position,
its Missions, and the world generally.
As before stated, it is a curious fact that in 1824 the Society
was not aware of its being twenty-five years old ! The tradition
had grown up that it was founded in 1800, probably because
Pratt and the few other survivors of the little band of founders '■'
had been wont to date the commencement of the Society, not
from its actual formation in 1799, but from its resolve to go
forward in the following year, when the Archbishop's reply was
received. It was Henry Venn who afterwards put the matter
right, and celebrated the Jubilee in the true fiftieth year. But let
us take advantage of the mistake, and instead of taking our stand
definitely in April, 1824, adopt for our survey the broader platform
of the years 1824 and 1825 generally, up to which period the
preceding chapters have brought the history of the Missions.
On April 23rd, 1824, just after the real twenty-fifth birthday,
Josiah Pratt resigned his Secretaryship. It is only a close study
of the period that can enable one to realize the importance of this
* Of the original thirty-two (members of Committee and V.P.s), twelve
were still alive in 1824.
The Outlook after Twenty-five Years 237
event. Pratt has never been fully appreciated. He is not a Part III.
historic character. But a sense of his greatness grows upon the 1^12-24.
mind as the Society's inner history is followed, and as the ^^' '
Missionary Begister is studied page by page. In particular, the
combination in him of faithfulness to the spiritual principles which His char-
were — and are — the life and soul of the Society, with the truest ^ork.^"'*
and most generous breadth of sympathy towards other men and
other organizations, was almost unique. One cannot resist the
conviction that in this breadth of sympathy he did not always
carry all his colleagues on the Committee with him ; but of the
value of it to the Society during those critical early years there
can be no manner of doubt. To quote two very diverse authorities :
Dr. Overton calls him " quite one of the best in every way of the
Evangelical clergy." " Like many of the Evangelicals," he says,
" Pratt showed great business talents, which were most valuable
in the management of their various projects. He was a man of
singularly unobtrusive character, and was rather forced by circum-
stances than led by his own choice into prominence. His forte
was practical wisdom." And Mr. Jowett, who was one of his
successors in the Secretariat : — " He was a man all energy — grave,
firm, undaunted energy, with a mind comprehensive, sagacious,
sound, and practical ; a mind always busy, going forth in its
exc versions throughout the length and breadth of the land, and
through the compass of the whole earth. . . . With these original
qualities of the understanding was combined a power of labour
truly astonishing. . . . Others might deliberate ; he could de-
liberate and act too. ... In the qualities of his heart he was
truly large, fervent, and affectionate." " I never knew a man
like him," Bishop Gobat once said, " able to ask of missionary
candidates such plain questions without offending." How true
was Cecil's forecast when Pratt first came to him as curate in
1795, and the young clergyman was timid and downcast — " Never
mind, Pratt : make yourself useful, and tJie time icill come when
you will he wanted."
The ground of Pratt's retirement was the increasing burden of
the Missionary Begister, which occupied a very large portion of his
time ; and any reader of its volumes at that period will wonder
that the editor could find an hour for anj^thing else. It may justly
be again observed that no missionary periodical of the present day
can compare with what the Begister was then, in comprehensive-
ness and completeness, and editorial industry. That there was no
hidden reason for resignation behind, in the shape of any dif-
ference with the Committee, is clear from the fact that they at
once appointed him Chairman of the Committee of Correspondence,
an office of far more dominating influence then than it could
possibly 1)6 now, when the numbers are five or six times greater.'''
* There is now no permMiient Chairman of this Committee. In the absence
of the President, some Vice-Pi-esirlent or other member is voted to the chair
ad hoc.
238 The Outlook after Tiventv-fij-e Years
Part III. There is no reason to doubt that Pratt wrote the bulk of the
1812-34. Eeport of 1824, though he retked just before its presentation. Its
lap^ • concluding paragraphs are' singularly weighty. Let a short
His last passage be given : —
Report.
''No man can say that he has acted up to the extent of his ol)ligations.
Let hiiii but feel, in its full energy, the constrainino- power of the love of
Christ to his own soul, and the tirst waking thought and the last
conscious desire of every day will be how he may best live unto Him
who died for him. Let him but know in the full comprehension of their
value, the things which are freely given to him of God, and lay to heart
the dreadfid state and inuninent danger of the perishing world, with his
own responsibility for the talents coirunitted to his charge, and the few
fleeting moments in which, to all eternity, he will be aV)le to do any-
thmg toward the Salvation of innuortal souls — let him feel all this as he
ought, and every faculty of body and soul, every hour of his waking
life, and every atom of power and influence which he can command,
will be devoted to rescue souls from death and to hide a multitude of
sins."
But upon the whole, this last Eeport of Pratt's has a distinctly
sombre tone. Its opening words are, " The Committee have to
display a chequered scene," and reference is immediately made to
A time of the "very severe trials" which it had "pleased God, in His wise
and righteous Providence, to bring on some parts of the Missions " ;
and the whole outlook at this time was very different from the
animated expectations that had marked the period of development,
1813 to 1816. Missionary leaders were now learning, year by
year, the hard lesson that the Jericho-walls of Heathenism do not
fall at the first summons ; that the great Enemy's malice is most
especially manifested against that division of the Lord's army that
attacks him in his strongholds; that the " strong man armed "
can only be dispossessed of his usurped dominion by the direct
power of the " Stronger than he." Many encouraging facts dwelt
upon by Pratt in the Begister ■■'• a few months before this time, as
for example that the contributions to the various Societies now
amounted to £1000 per day,f — that the Scriptures had been
translated into one hundred and forty-four languages, — that tens of
thousands of souls had already been gathered from among the
Heathen, numbers of whom had died in the faith and were now
safe for ever, — only tended to make the antagonism, both of " flesh
and blood" and of "principalities and powers," more vehement
and bitter than ever. Naturally, therefore, we find the reality of
the Devil and his works much dwelt upon at this time. For
fohn Cun- instance, J. W. Cunningham's powerful Sermon at the Anniver-
ling-ham's
* January, 1821. The January number of the Register was at this time
always devoted to a survey of the world and of Missions.
t In the Register of December, 1825, is given a List of Contributions to
" Missionary, Bible, Tract, and Education Societies," including institutions
like the National Society, the Sunday School Union, the Naval and Military
Bible Society, &c. The total is estimated at about £380,000; but more than
half of this would be for home work.
The Outlook after Twenty-five Years 239
sary of 1823 is devoted to this subject.-'' The text combines, in a Part III.
way which is not at all common, the 31st and 32nd verses of St. 1812-2-4.
John xii., " Now shall the prince of this world be cast out ; and I, Chap^lS.
if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me " ; and
the subject is, in the preacher's words, " The Empire of Satan
upon Earth, and the Destruction of that Empire by the Son of
God." After a masterly sketch of the results of the Devil's
dominion, both outwardly in Heathendom, and inwardly even in
the hearts of professing Christians, and a striking picture of the
gradual present victory and complete future triumph of Christ,
Cunningham proceeds to ask pointedly, " Why should any man
be astonished to find almost innumerable obstacles and enemies to
the prosecution of the missionary cause?" "The Missionary
Enterprise," he goes on, " may be considered as an assault, at
once open and direct, at the very heart of its citadel. Is it not
then to be expected that an Enemy so fierce, powerful, and
implacable, will resist such an attack ? ... Is the evil spirit an
' accuser of the brethren ' ? — then have we a right to expect
' railing accusation ' against his opposers. Is he the ' father of
lies ' ? — then we may expect to be pursued by the grossest false-
hoods and calumnies. Was he ' a murderer from the beginning ' ?
— then have we reason to anticipate persecution, and every species
of violence by which unmeasured and unwearied malignity can
prosecute its object." At his concluding paragraphs we will look
presently.
Meanwhile, let us glance at the Mission-field. In West x^frica. Reverses
the work had almost collapsed, owing to the terrible succession of '"
deaths ; there were already signs of the tares springing up amid the
wheat, even in the district (Eegent) that had been the scene of the
lamented Johnson's much-blessed labours ; and the slave-trade,
particularly under the French flag, was reviving, with all its
horrors, along the whole coast. In New Zealand, after ten years'
work, no spiritual fruit had been gathered, and the Mission had
been sadly damaged by the bad conduct of some of the agents.
On the shores of the Mediterranean, and in Travancore, the
ancient Churches of the East were showing less disposition than
they had shown at first to accept the reforming suggestions from
the West ; and the Greek revolt had been met by increased
manifestations of bigotry and fanaticism on the part of Moham-
medan Turkey. In Eussia, too, the narrower school in the Eusso-
Greek Church was regaining the upper hand, and troubling the
Scottish Missions on the Caspian ; and this, with the growing
enmity of the Tartar population, led to several stations being aban-
doned ; while the death of the Czar Alexander in 1825 put an end
to the large hopes that hung upon his personal piety and sympathy
with missionary effort. In India, progress was very slow, except
in Tinnevelly ; the most shocking accounts of widow-burning and
* Likewise C. F. Childe's Sermon in 1879.
240 The Outlook after Twenty-five Years
Part III. child-murdei- were coming home, and rending the hearts of the
1812-24. readers of the Begister ;■'■' the first Bisliop had died, and the second
Chap^lS. j^^^ ^j^^y .^^g^ landed; from the S.P.C.K. Tamil Missions no
reports were being received at all ; and the greatest Mission in
Bengal, that of the Baptists at Serampore, was in the midst of the
untoward dispute which presently separated it for many years
from the parent society. In South Africa, the great work of
Moffat and others, — and in the South Seas, the great work of John
Williams and others, — under the London Missionary Society,
were meeting with serious (though temporary) checks. China
was still virtually closed ; but Morrison, whose Chinese Bible
had long been complete, was at this very time in England,
forming plans for Chinese work at Singapore in view of a possible
future entrance into the empire itself. Japan, of course, was still
hermetically sealed ; and its name never occurs at all in these
early Eeports and Begisters.
Perhaps the most painful manifestation of the Enemy's malice
was in the West Indies. The Anti-Slavery Society had just been
formed (1823) ; Wilberforce had committed the cause to Fowell
Buxton, and Buxton had opened his Parliamentary campaign ; and
the slave-proprietors in the West Indies, having taken alarm at
the rising feeling in England against slavery in any form, were
seriously opposing missionary work among the negroes. Some
Wesley an missionaries, overawed by their attitude, had publicly
disclaimed all sympathy with the Abolitionists, and thereupon had
been disavowed and censured by their Society at home. In
Demerara, a missionary of the L.M.S. was unjustly condemned to
execution for his sympathy with the negroes, and died in prison.
But his case, and the West Indian Slavery question generally, will
come before us hereafter.
Criticism Naturally, controversies like these brought Missions into unusual
at home, p^^j^jig noticc ; and a torrent of ignorant and prejudiced criticism
poured forth from newspapers and reviews, which added to the
general sense of sore conflict and trial of faith. Notwithstanding
the favourable attitude of the Prime Minister, Lord Liverpool,
towards Missions, most leading statesmen — as usual — had no
faith in them ; and it is curious to find the Duke of Wellington,
then in the plenitude of his unique authority, declining to be
Patron of the Wellington CM. Association, on the ground that
"if the Society's object was to convert the Hindus, its efforts
would be fruitless if they were not mischievous." Ecclesiastical
opposition against the C.M.S., too, had revived. Good Bishop
Evder was translated from Gloucester to the Diocese (as it then
was) of Lichfield and Coventry, and the new Bishop of Gloucester
(Bethell) forbad all sermons and collections for the Society ;
several Archdeacons attacked the Society in their charges ; and at
places like Worcester, Eeading, and Guildford, attempts to form
CM. Associations failed. Nor did the opponents balance this
* See Mls><io»arii Register, 1824, pp. 238, 278i
The Outlook after Tiventy-five Years 241
wpposition by any zeal in behalf of Missions under auspices more Part III.
congenial to them. The S.P.G. was again in financial difficulties. 1812-2-i.
The great Eoyal Letter Collection in 1819 had been put in trust ^^^P- ^^•
for Bishop's College ; and the ordinary funds had rather suffered '
by it. In 1823, the S.P.G. income from voluntary contributions
was only £2100, which with £4700 from the dividends on reserve
and trust funds, and £9200 from the Government for Canadian
clergy, was quite insufficient even for its then hmited work ; while
it was at this very time arranging to take over the South Indian
Missions which the S.P.C.K. had not the machinery for managing.
Again Pratt came to the front with a strong appeal for S.P.G. in
the Begister ; ="'■ other C.M.S. men helped : for example, a " district
society" was formed at Clapham itself by Dealtry, Basil Woodd
and Cunningham speaking on the occasion. And from about
this time the Society began to expand and develop as it has done
ever _ since. _ In the very next year, 1826, it held its first really
public meeting, in Freemasons' Hall, on which occasion Dealtry
was one of the speakers.
So there were many things to account for sombre reports. And
the Church Missionary Society could not but feel the departure Deaths of
of old and revered friends. Thomas Scott— " Father Scott," as ^"^"'*^-
he was affectionately called, died in 1821, and Charles Grant in
1823 ; f both, however, leaving sons who did noble work for the
missionary cause. Wilberforce's last speech in Parliament, on
West Indian slavery, was delivered in 1824 ; and though he hved
yet some years, it was mostly in retirement. On the other hand. New
new friends were coming forward. Charles Grant the younger, ^"^"ds.
afterwards Lord Glenelg, who had already gained a position in
Parliament, was a w^arm supporter. So was Fowell Buxton,
Wilberforce's successor in the Anti-Slavery campaign. The
names of Hugh Stowell and Hugh McNeiie begin to appear
among the speakers at meetings. Henry Venn the younger, the
future Secretary, joined the Committee in 1822. Buxton's first
speech at the Anniversary, in 1822, is very striking in its way
of presenting our responsibility : —
" I will put the case to myself :— ' You are a professor of Cluistianity—
you avow your belief of its truth, and admire its doctrines— you
enumerate the blessings which He gives who gives all things, and you
count among them His inestimable love in the redemption of the world—
you know that Christian charity is the inseparable fruit of true faith—
and you know that this chanty seeks above all things the salvation of the
souls of men. What do you do ? You subscribe your two or three
guineas a year ! The conversion of eight hundred millions of souls-
there is the object to be accomplished !— and there is the sacrifice which
you are prepared to make for it ! '
* November, 1825.
t Charles Grant literaJly died in liaruess. After two days and nights ol'
almost uninterrupted work, he retired to rest feeling rather ill— as well he
might. The doctor was sent for, and applied remedies ; but Grant turned over
in bed, and " fell asleep."
VOL. I. T>
242 The Outlook after Twenty-five Years
Part III. "Were I to say, in the ordinary business of life, ' Such and such an
1812-24. object is my grand concern : to that I direct all my powers : on that my
Chap. 18. very soul is centred : and I give for this great object my two-and-
forty shillings a year ' — such professions would be counted but an idle
mockery, when compared with such feebleness and inadequacy of
exertion."
As regards patronage, too, there was some little progress, not-
withstanding the criticisms and the opposition. No other English
Bishop had joined, besides the two already on the list, Bathurst
of Norwich, and Eyder, now of Lichfield and Coventry ; but
Archbishop Trench of Tuam represented the Church of Ireland,
and the Bishop of Calcutta (Heber) the "Episcopate abroad. There
were two Deans, Pearson of Salisbury, and Lord Lifford of
Armagh ; and there were four Heads of Houses, of Oriel and
Magdalen Hall at Oxford, and of Queens' and Corpus at Cam-
bridge. The laymen were better represented by ten peers and ten
M.P.'s. Of the latter. Sir Eobert Harry Inglis, the well-known
and highly-respected member for Oxford University for so many
years, is the most noticeable. We shall meet him hereafter. It
should be added that many other peers were Patrons of Pro-
vincial i\.ssociations, though not of the Parent Society. No less
than twenty-six of these appear in the Eeport of 1824. Among the
names it is interesting to see " the Earl of Derby " and " the Earl
of Eosebery." Here also we may notice the names added to the
list of Honorary Governors for Life, for their " very essential ser-
vices to the Society," in addition to those mentioned in our Tenth
Chapter." There were, of the home clergy, J. W. Cunningham,
Fountain Elwin (Secretary of the great Bristol Association), John
Langiey (Shropshire Association), William Marsh, Gerard Noel,
Legh Eichmond, E. W. Sibthorp (the eloquent preacher who
afterwards joined the Church of Eome, then came back, and then
seceded again), Charles Simeon, J. H. Singer (Secretary of the
Hibernian Auxiliary, afterwards Bishop of Meath), Professor
Scholelield of Cambridge, Haldane Stewart, and one or two others ;
Henry Davies (Bombay Cbaplain) ; and three laymen, viz.. Colonel
Munro, of Travancore ; J. M. Strachan, of Madras ; and J. H.
Harington, of Calcutta.
The Anniversaries continued to be occasions of great interest to
an ever- widening circle of members and friends. The preachers
subsequent to 1817, up to which date they have already been
noticed, were, in 1818, Professor Parish, of Cambridge ; in 1819,
the Hon. Gerard T. Noel ; in 1820, B. W. Mathias, of Dublin ; in
1821, Wilham Jowett, whose sermon has before been noticed; in
. 1822, Marmaduke Thompson, the Madras chaplain; in 1823, John
W. Cunningham, of Harrow, as already mentioned ; in 1821,
Fountain Elwin, of whose sermon more presently.
Progress at The Society's Income was steadily rising. In 1823-4 it was
£31,500; and in the following year it rose to £40,000, and never
* See p. 111.
home.
The Outlook after Twenty-five Years 243
again fell below that figure. The advance shown is really not so Part Hi.
great as it actually was, owing to some slight changes in the mode 1812-24.
of presenting the accounts. In a future chapter, the financial P" ^^'
details will be more fully explained. The sources of Income
presented a striking illustration of the power of littles. Large
benefactions and legacies were few and far between ; but penny
collections were organized all over the country. Ladies' Associa-
tions were a great power in those days. They were not
parochial, but for a tow^n or district ; and hundreds of ladies went
round and round collecting the pennies week by week and month
by month. The poor gave eagerly ; artizans' Missionary Unions
were formed ; Sunday-schools and Juvenile Associations were
multiplying. At Harrow, Cunningham had been unable, from
local circumstances, to start a regular Association so early as he
wished ; but at length a meeting was held : the room was
thronged ; and five hundred labourers, servants, &c.,put down their
names as penny subscribers. A Juvenile Association at Hull, and
a Sunday-school at Leeds, raised each of them over £100 a year.
A new publication, the Quarterly Paper, had been started in 1816,
for free distribution to those humble but regular contributors ; and
over half a million copies were circulated in 1822. It was beginning
to be the custom at some Provincial Anniversaries to hold meet-
ings in the evening " for the Labouring Classes." Of course
regular Annual Meetings everywhere were held in the daytime. An
evening meeting at Manchester in 1823 is specially mentioned,
which was attended by 1200 persons of the working class. Yet,
with all this activity, the great bulk of the clergy still held aloof ;
and many even of decided Evangelical views merely supported
the Society because it was Evangelical, but showed no real zeal in
the missionary cause. Again and again do the Annual Eeports
and Sermons appeal to the clergy ; and this in tone and language
that leave no doubt in the reader's mind that they were regarded
as exceptionally backward in fulfilling their great obligation to
obey the Lord's Last Command.
At the end of 1824, the Society had sent out from Europe
ninety-eight men,='= and six single women. Of the ninety-eight
thirty-two were English clergymen ; thirty-two were English
laymen (including a few who were ordained afterwards) ; thirty
were in Lutheran orders (sixteen from the Berlin Seminary, nine
from the Basle Seminary, two from the University of Jena, and
three others) ; and four were German laymen. Of the whole
ninety-eight, fifty-four were still on the roll afc the end of 1824.
Of the six single women, five had married and one died. The
number of wives was forty-seven.
It was only in the Eeport of 1823 that the Society first
published a Statistical Table. It contains the numbers of Euro- statistics.
* The roll of men to that date is exactly one hundred ; bnt this includes
Bowley, the Eurasian, in North India, and Puckey, a lay settler in New
Zealand who had gone from Sydney.
K 2
244 ^^^^ Outlook after Twenty-five Years
Part III. pean and Native missionaries and agents, and of schools and
1812-2-i. scholars. At the end of 1824, there were but two " Native mission-
GhaiK^is. ^^.JQg^" Abdul Masih and Bowley the Eurasian. There were 319
" Native teachers and assistants," but two-thirds of these were in
India, where probably the non-Christian school-teachers were
included. There were 296 schools, and 14,090 scholars. Not till
1832 was an estimate given of the number of communicants ; and
not till 1869, of the total number of Christian adherents.
The numerous deaths and disappointments in the Missions,
especially in West Africa, led the Committee to think much of the
importance of native agency. In the Report of 1823, they
express very earnestly their hope and prayer that efficient native
evangelists and teachers might be raised up " in such numbers,
through the blessing of the Holy Spirit, as to supersede the
necessity of any other supply of Teachers from Christendom than
those guides and counsellors who, availing themselves of the
experience of all the older Churches of Christ in the West, might
be the means of establishing and extending the rising Churches of
the Heathen World." But this was yet in the future.
Candi- Meanwhile the arrangements for training men at home were
^^"^^^^ at this time occupying much of the Committee's attention. Since
Scott had been obliged to give up the charge of candidates —
Benjamin Bailey was the last under him, — they had been dis-
tributed among various clergymen in different parts of the country,
for theological reading with a view to holy orders. That is, for
part of their time. The weeks occupied during the consideration
of their candidature, and again between the completion of their
theological studies and their sailing for the Mission-field, they
spent under Bickersteth's care, in Salisbury Square as long as he
resided in the House, and, when the House became too small, at a
house taken for him in Barnsbury Park. Mr. Dandeson Coates,
afterwards Lay Secretary, lived at the Office after Bickersteth left
it, and gave a good deal of time to assisting in the details of
business. With Bickersteth also resided the men from Basle
during their sojourn in England. But as his chief work was in
the country, travelling from place to place, preaching and si3eaking
at local Anniversaries, the time that he could give to the candi-
dates and students was not large. In view of all these circum-
stances, the Committee began to feel that a regular Training
Institution for the Society was becoming an urgent need. Some
of their friends opposed the idea, and urged that accepted candi-
dates should be sent to the Universities ; but it was ultimately
agreed that while men educated independently at the Universities,
and then coming forw^ard for missionary work, should l)e earnestly
sought for, it was desirable, in the case of men of humbler station,
requiring, to be trained at the Society's expense, that they should
be under the more immediate supervision of the Society's repre-
sentatives. Hence the scheme, one of Pratt's special hobbies, for
establishing an Institution at Islington. Of this Institution we
The Outlook after Tiventy-five Years 245
shall see more in an early chapter. The House in Upper Street part hi.
%Yas opened for the reception of students on January 31st, 1825 ; 1812-24.
but the college buildings were not erected for two or three years Chap. 18.
later. Its history, therefore, falls into our next period. '
Meanwhile the Basle Seminary was turning out admh-able men, Basiemen.
under the guidance of its highly-respected Principal, Theophilus
Blumhardt. The Committee justly placed great confidence in his
faithfulness and wisdom ; and when he visited England in 1822,
he was warmly welcomed, and spoke at the Anniversary Meeting.
Although at this time, and until 1826, his men received only
Lutheran orders, he fully agreed to their adopting the Prayer Book
in its entirety, and assured the Committee that they were able,
" from a full conviction of their hearts," to accept the ordinances
of the Church of England. In the next quarter of a century we
shall find that a large proportion of the Society's best and ablest
missionaries came from the Basle Seminary ; but most of these, as
we shall see, received further training in England, and English
orders.
One of the early difficulties of the Society in sending forth
missionaries — the obtaining English ordination for them — was Ordina-
now entirely removed. After Bishops Eyder and Bathurst joined ^'°"^"
the Society, they ordained men at the Committee's request,
accepting as a title the Committee's agreement to employ them.
Archbishop Harcourt, of York, did the same on two or three
occasions. But an arrangement like this could only be provisional.
However, the difficulty was solved in 1819 by an Act of Parlia-
ment called the Colonial Service Act, which gave the Archbishops
of Canterbury and York and the Bishop of London power to
ordain men for " His Majesty's Colonies and Foreign Possessions,"
under certain restrictions. From that time the Bishop of London
regularly ordained the Society's missionaries. Indeed he had
claimed to have the right before, objecting to Bishop Eyder doing
so ; -■' and the Act settled the question. The first missionary thus
ordained was Isaac Wilson (who married Miss Cooke of Calcutta),
at Christmas, 1820, and the second Henry Williams (afterwards
Archdeacon in New Zealand), at Trinity, 1822.
One new Mission had been lately started, which has not yet 5J'^^|°" '"
been mentioned. The Society for Missions in " Africa and the vv/st "
East " had gone into the Far West. So far back as 1810, a ^'^^''''^a.
gentleman in Upper Canada, Mr. John Johnston, had called the
Society's attention to the Red Indians of the Ojibbeway tribe on
Lake Superior, and stated that if a man could be sent to them, the
Bishop of Quebec (then the only Bishop in Canada) would no
doubt ordain him. Inquiry was accordingly made ; but Bishop
Mountain declined to ordain any such person, and the matter
dropped. In 1819, another proposal was made to the Society, by
a member of the North-West Fur Company (not yet amalgamated
* Committee Minutes, September, 1818.
246 The Outlook after Twenty-five Years
Tart III. with the Hudson's Bay Company), to estabhsh a Mission among
Ph^^^it' ^^® Indians beyond the Eocky Mountains, in what is now British
^^' ■ Cohimbia. The Committee undertook " to procure further infor-
mation " ; but what the result was does not appear, as the matter
is not again referred to. Nearly forty years were yet to elapse
before a North Pacific Mission was started.
A third proposal led to more definite results. In 1820, the
Eev. John West, Curate of White Eoding, Essex, an active
member of the Society, was appointed by the Hudson's Bay Com-
pany chaplain to their settlement on Eed Eiver, south of
Lake Winnipeg. He laid before the Committee a proposal for
establishing schools for the Indian children in that district ; and
they voted £100 to assist him in this scheme. In the following
year, he wrote proposing a regular Mission ; and two members of
the Board of the Hudson's Bay Company, Mr. Nicholas Garry
and Mr. Benjamin Harrison, attended the Committee to support
the application. The result was the appointment of Mr. West
himself to superintend the Mission, of a schoolmaster to work
under him, and, subsequently, of one of the Society's students,
David T. Jones, to be an additional missionary ; and the voting of
£800 a year to cover expenses. These decisions being come to in
1822 make that year the date of the North-West America
Mission." In the autumn of that year. Captain (afterwards Sir
John) Franklin, returned from one of his great Arctic expeditions,
and came to the Society to urge it to extend its work to other
Indian tribes scattered over those vast regions, particularly
pressing the claims of the Eskimo. But many years were to pass
before these extensions could be undertaken.
It is very interesting to observe how, as the work went on year
by year, the C.M.S. leaders were acquiring not only experience in
Higher the practical conduct of Missions, but higher and truer conceptions
Mir^!o°ns *-*^ ^ ® work itself, and of the obligations of Christians regarding
it. In a former chapter it was observed that the miseries of the
Heathen appeared to them at first the chief motive of Missions,
and that the unique position and urgency of the Lord's Last
Command did not seem to have dawned upon them. In the
Eeport of 1819, however, we find for the first time the two great
Missionary Commands of Christ put in juxtaposition, and the duty
of " every Christian in every age " insisted on plainly : —
"From the moment when our Lord, looking on the desolate multitudes
of Judtea, gave that injunction to His discijjles, ' Pray ye the Lord of
the Harvest that He would send forth labourers into His Harvest,'—
from that moment. Prayer for this object has never ceased to be the
Duty of every Chi'istian. From the moment when He left that last
command, ' Go ye into all the world and preach the Gospel to every
creatui-e,' — from that moment, every possible effort has been the Duty
of every Christian in every age."
* So it was called for three-quarters of a century. It is now called North-
West Canada Mission, this name being preferred bv Canadian friends.
The Outlook after Twenty-fu'e Years 247
In Pratt's annucal Survey of the World, in the Eegister of Part HI.
January, 1820, there is a remarkable anticipation of a great thought Jj^^^~ j"J"
which has only been quite recently formulated, viz. that it is the ^'^^'
duty of Christians to take definite measures for the Evangehzation s.v.m.u.
of the Whole World within a limited time. As now formulated, [I'cfpated.'
the "watchword," as it is called, says "in this Generation." It
is not put quite h\ that form in 1820 ; but elaborate calculations
are given regarding the number of millions of Heathen in the
world, and the possibility of sending 30,000 missionaries from
Europe and the United States in twenty-one years. It is shown,
in the qui(^est and most cogent manner, that this could be done,
and that the cost would be met by an annual contribution from
each communicant in Protestant Christendom of four dollars, say
sixteen shillings. The use of dollars in the calculation reveals the
source of the scheme. It was drawn up by Gordon Hall and
Samuel Newell, two members of the first band of missionaries
sent to the Heathendom of the Eastern Hemisphere by the
Christians of the United States — of that band, sent by the
American Board of Foreign Missions, whose untoward reception
by the British authorities at Calcutta, in 1812, has been noticed
in a previous chapter. They were now at Bombay, and thence
they sent this remarkable scheme to Boston. Pratt received it in
due course, and inserted large extracts, with full commendation,
in the Eegister. From the United States it is, in our own day,
that the proposition in still more definite form has come.
It does not appear that this Bombay scheme laid any hold of
the mind of the Christian pubhc. The time was certainly not ripe
for it. But there was another subject brought forward at this
period, which engaged wnder attention, and which also antici-
pated much that has occupied the minds of devout and devoted
Christians in these latter years. This was the need of a /Vcs/tAnout-
/• 7 Tr 7 c< • • pouring of
outpouring of the Hoiy b^nnt. the spirit
It is a remarkable circumstance that what seems to have first "eeded,
brought this subject into especial prominence in Josiah Pratt's
mind was — of all things ! — the Coronation of George IV., in 1821.
The very solemn Coronation Service had not been heard in
England for sixty years, owing to George III.'s long reign; and
when it was at last used again, its unfamiliar phrases created a
deep impression. In the Eegister of January, 1822, Pratt quotes
and comments on the Service, pointing out especially that it
' ' recognizes and enforces the necessity of the constant and
abundant influences of the Holy Spirit, in order to success in the
labours of Government and in the conduct of the Christian Life."
For instance, " The King is consecrated to his Office by the
significative act of anointing with Oil — denoting those Gracious
Influences and that Heavenly Unction of the Holy Spirit, without
which he cannot fulfil his awful obhgations. To this end. Prayer
is put up for the strengthening Gi'ace of the Holy Ghost." Then,
after noticing the difficulties and disappointments besetting mis-
24'"^ The Outlook after Twenty-five Years
Part III. sionary work all over the world, Pratt urges upon Christians the
1812-24. (Jluty of prayer for the outpouring of the Spirit. In the following
Ghap^S. ygg^j,^ 1823, his annual Survey is headed, "The Conversion of
And the World dependent on the more abundant influence of the Holy
prayed for. gpji-it." The subject, it is Stated, was attaining prominence "in
the Pulpit, in Prayer, in Addresses and Eesolutions at Public
Meetings, in Instructions delivered to Missionaries, in Eeports of
Societies, and in the Communications of the Labourers them-
selves "; and it is added that special courses of sermons on " the
Deity, Offices, and Gracious Operations of the Holy Ghost" were
being delivered in many churches. In that year came John
Cunningham's Sermon, referred to earlier in this chapter. By
what means did he affirm that the influences of Satan must be
met and overcome? "It is only by an agency like his own,
spiritual and invisible," urges the preacher, " that we can hope
effectually to contend with him " ; and therefore. Prayer for the
Holy Spirit is the great weapon. He refers to " the multiplication
of prayers for the outpouring of the Spirit" as " a sign of the
times," and dwells on " the consolatory fact that thus the weakest,
the most unlearned, the poor palsied or bedridden soldier of the
Cross can carry the war into the very camp of the Enemy."
Then in the following year, 1824, Fountain Elwin, the energetic
Secretary of the great Bristol Association, being the appointed
Preacher, went straight to the heart of the subject. " It shall
come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of My
Spirit upon all flesh" — these words, in which St. Peter, on the
Day of Pentecost, quoted the old prophecy of Joel, were his
animating text. And it is a delightful sermon every way, full
of Scripture, full of the Spirit of whom it speaks, full of true
missionary earnestness and enthusiasm. Why is the professing
Christian world, it asks, exhibiting so little of the life and power
of religion? Because the words are true of so many, "Having
not the Spirit." Why is Oriental Christendom withered and
decayed ? Because they have still to hear ' ' what the Spirit saith
unto the Churches." How long will Israel be yet an outcast from
the Lord ? " Until the Spirit be poured upon them from on high."
Why is Heathendom in moral darkness ? Because another s^nrit,
the " god " and " prince of this world," rules there undisturbed.
What then is to be done ? Send forth men who can truly respond
to the solemn question at their ordination, " Do you trust that you
are inwardly moved by the Holy Ghost?" — who will take no
weapon but "the sword of the Spirit" — whose motto will be,
"Not by might, nor by power, but by My Spirit" — who will
"keep the unity of the Spirit"; and we all, on our part, must
look for the outpouring, like Elijah by his servant's eyes — 2Jray for
it, as Elijah did while the servant was looking — and labour to
promote it, because even the Omnipotent Spirit works by means.
FROM PEATT'S RETIREMENT TO
VENN'S ACCESSION: 1824-1841.
NOTE ON PART IV.
This Part only contains six chaptei's, but they are long and important
ones. The first two are devoted to home affairs. Chap. XIX. is the
first of a series of chapters which, one or more in each Part of the
History, introduce to lis the Personnel of the Society, the Secretaries and
Committee-men, the Preachers and Speakers at the Anniversaries, the
Candidates and Missionaries, and those friends and fellow-workers who
died in the period. In like manner. Chap. XX. is the first of a series
of chapters which in each Part show us the Society's Environment
diu'ing the Period, particularly dwelling on the state and progress of
the Church of England, with especial reference to the relations of the
Evangelical school or party to other schools and pai'ties. In this
chapter we see something of the condition of England when Queen
Victoria ascended the throne, the great improvements within the Church,
certain internal differences among Evangelicals, and the rise of the
Tractarian or Oxford Movement.
The other four chapters take us again to the Mission-field. India
absorbs two of them. Chap. XXI. is an important chapter, parallel to
the " Environment " chapters at home. It notices the changes and
developments in India in the period of the "thirties, particularly the
reforms of Lord W. Bentinck ; also the episcopate of Daniel Wilson,
and his struggle with Caste ; also the advent of Alexander Duff and the
commencement of Educational Missions under his auspices. Then
Chap. XXII. turns our attention to the C.M.S. Missions, and takes a
survey of them all round India, with a glance at other Missions, and at
Ceylon. Chap. XXIII. carries us back to Sierra Leone, and then across
the Atlantic to the West Indies, teUing the painful story of Slavery
there and the story also of Buxton's successful attack upon it. All the
other Missions are grouped together in Chap. XXIV., New Zealand, the
Mediterranean, and Rupert's Land, and the short-lived attempts at
work in Abyssinia, and in Zululand, and among the Australian Blacks.
^.
REV. J. W. CUNNINGHAM.
REV. W. JOWETT
REV. E. BICKERSTETH.
BISHOP RYDER.
SIR T. FOWELL BUXTON.
J. W. CunninKham, Vicar of Harrow, the most frequent .speaker at C.M.S.Aimiver.saries.
W. Jowett, First Cambridue Missinnarv ; Secretary of C.M.S., 1832-18J.a.
Echvanl Bicker.steth, CM. 8. Secretary', 1816-1830.
Henry Ryder, Bishop of t;iouce.ster and of Lichfield ; First Bishop to join C.M.S.
T. Fowell Buxton, M.P., Leaderiin Anti-Slave Trade Campaign.
CHAPTER XIX.
7'/re rEllSOXXEL OF THE FeuTOT).
Dandeson Coates — Edward Bickersteth — The Committee — Lord
Chichester President— The two Bishops Sumner— The Preachers
and Speakers— B. Noel and Dale suggest "Own Missionaries"—
The Missionaries— The CM. College— Deaths— Simeon and Wil-
berforce.
" IT'e have many memhers in one hoihj, ami all metnhers hare nnt the mine
office." — Rom. xii. 4.
TIE title of this Fourth Part of our History embodies Part IV.
no mere arbitrary division of time. The period of I82i-il.
Pratt's Secretaryship was a distinctive period ; and so <^'''"P- !!••
was the period of Henry Venn's Secretaryship.
Pratt's retirement marked a real epoch ; and so, still
more conspicuously, did Venn's accession. It is impossible to a period ot
study the history of the seventeen years that elapsed between the l°^n°not''
one epoch and the other without feeling that they formed in some extension,
i-espects an interregnum. There was progress, \assuredly. The
Society's income more than doubled in the period. Associations
multiplied all over the country. Two hundred missionaries were
sent out, against one hundred in the preceding twenty years. In
some of the mission-fields there was distinct advance, as we shall
see. Nevertheless, the progress was due rather to the natural
growth of what had been planted before, tlian to definite forward
steps— except in one instance, the West Indies Mission — on the
part of the Society. Consolidation rather than extension is the
note of the period. Much was done in the way of regulations,
financial and personal. The rules regarding Candidates, Students,
Furloughs, Marriage, Children, Sick and Retired J^Iissionaries,
Associations at home, Corresponding Committees abroad. Episcopal
Licenses, &c., &c., were gradually formulated. The Society,
having passed its infancy and its vigorous youth, was settling into
tlie maturity of middle life.
Throughout the period, a commanding lay personality to a large
extent dominated the committee-room. Mr. Dandeson Coates Dandeson
had been a memljer of the Committee from 1817 ; and from 1820 ^°^*^^-
he had lived in the Church ^[issionary House, rendering valuable
assistance in the practical details of tlie work. On the rearranf^e-
2^2
T/TE Personnel of the Period
Part IV.
1824r-41.
Chap. 19.
ment consequent on Pratt's retirement in 1824, he was appointed
Assistant Secretary ; and in 1830 he received the title, then first
used, of Lay Secretary. This office he held till his death in 1846.
He was a very able man, possessing, said Henry Venn long after-
wards, "first-rate powers of ))usiness." "The official corre-
spondence," continues Venn,"- " was never more ably conducted.
Sir James Stephen used to say that he knew no one in the public
service who worked more efficiently and zealously in an adminis-
trative department." It is to him, evidently, that the formulating
of the various regulations for the practical working of so compli-
cated a machine as a great missionary society was mainly due.
He represented also, with great vigour — sometimes with too great
vigour, — the policy of a vigilant guardianship of the Society's
independence of official Church control. This was naturally the
lay view of many questions that came before the Committee ; and
the more conciliatory, though not less staunchly evangelical,
element was supplied by his clerical colleagues, — who, however,
were often overborne by the force of his strong personality. Both
Bickersteth and Jowett, who were successively his associates
as Secretaries, felt the strain. Of the latter, Venn says : — " Of his
Christian wisdom and missionary sympathies it is not possible
to speak too highly ; but the full vigour of his lay colleague
somewhat overshadowed his administration." Canon Bateman,
the biographer and son-in-law of Daniel Wilson, writes : f — •
" The clerical secretary at this epoch (1832) was the pious
and amiable William Jowett ; but the lay secretary and the
ruling mind was Mr. Dandeson Coates. Most men of that day
will remember his tall, thin figure, his green shade, his quiet
manner, untiring industry, and firm but somewhat narrow mind.
Whilst Mr. Jowett was writing kind and gentle letters, Mr. Coates
was stamping upon the committee the impress of his own decided
views ; and the lay element, paramount for the time at home,
soon became predominant abroad." Batemaii was perhaps not
quite an impartial judge, for reasons which will appear hereafter ;
but the traditions of the Church Missionary House confirm the
general impression given by his words.
Of the clerical secretaries of the period, the first to be mentioned
is Edward Bickersteth. We have already seen something of his
earlier life, of his work at Norwich, of his visit to West Africa, of
his residence (first at Salisbury Square and then at Barnsbury
Park) with the candidates, of his provincial journeys in behalf of
the cause. During Pratt's tenure of office, he was Assistant
Secretary ; on Pratt's retirement he succeeded to his chair. But
his principal work remained the same : he might still be called
" chief deputation " and " candidate secretary." Little, if any, of
the official administration was committed to him ; he kept up that
* Address at the Openino: of the New House, 1862 ; printed in the Q.M.
Intelligencer, April, 1862, and in the Appendix to the Life of H. Venn.
I Life of Bishop Wilson, vol. ii. p. 10.
The Fersosnel of the Period 253
fatlicrly, or brutlierly, correspondence with the missionaries which ]'akt IV.
is so important a part of a Secretary's work — though so httle |«^-l— tl-
noticed, — and for which the personal touch he had had with tliem '"^'"
as candidates specially fitted him ; but such of the regular
business as was not absorbed by Coates's all-embracing energy
was done by a second clerical secretary, the Eev. T. Woodrotie.
Of this colleague, though he held office seven years, the old
records tell nothing that gives the student of them any definite
impression ; and Venn, in the reminiscences already quoted from,
does not mention his name. But Bickersteth, though not
occupied with official business, was a power in the Society. The
growth of the income, the multiplication of associations, the
increasing number of offers of service, were mainly due to his
energy and devotion ; and, next to Pratt, he was unquestional)ly
the best and greatest of Venn's predecessors. He represented
the highest spiritual side of the Society's principles and methods His
and operations. His evangelical fervour was irresistible ; and ^^'^^0^^'
wherever he went, from county to county and from town to town,
he stirred his hearers to their hearts' depths, and set them
praying and working wuth redoubled earnestness. His beautiful
loving influence healed niany divisions, and bound both workers
at home and missionaries abroad in holy fellowship. If ever
a C.jNI.S. secretary was lilled with the Spirit, that secretar}' was
Edward Bickersteth.
In the Memoir of Bickersteth by liis son-in-law, Professor T. K.
Birks, and in an appendix thereto by Henry Venn, illustrations
are given of the application by Bickersteth of his spiritual prin-
ciples to controverted questions in the Society. He supported
Coates in some at least of his assertions of the Society's indepen-
dence, though not quite from tbe same standpoint ; not from the
dread of episcopal or clerical officialism, which was natural in a
layman, but from a jealous cai'e of the spiritual character of the
work. An important instance of this will come before us here-
after. But upon some questions, the laymen who were strong
advocates of independence were not with him, and in his
judgment they took too secular a view. Nanw says, " He was His
sometimes overborne in argument, but . . . subsequent events difficulties
have shown that his spiritual wisdom was a surer guide than the
more acute and forcible reasoning of his opponents." One ques-
tion, regarding the training of students at the ^Missionary College,
led to painful divisions between old and mutually valued friends.
Bickersteth was outvoted on this occasion ; ■■'• and although he
loyally accepted the decision, it is evident that the strain of such
conflicts told upon him, and prepared the way for his retirement.
Like other clerical secretaries in earlier days, he had a pastoral
charge in addition to his secretaryship, being minister of Wheler
Chapel (now St. INIary's, Spital Square) ; and iinding the double
* Mctnoir of E. Bickersteth, vol. i. pj). -li'l', 4;i«.
2 54 The Personnel of the Period
Part IV. labours l)eyond his strength, especially while his work consisted
Chft~l9 ^° largely of journeys to the provinces, he proposed to the
^HL ' Committee certain changes in his duties, particularly a smaller
amount of deputation service. " After fourteen years of incessant
travelhng, he might," he thought, "in justice to himself, and
without injury to the Society, have some partial rehef." He
plainly intimated that if they felt unable to adopt his proposals,
"he was prepared to consider their decision as the voice of God
calling him to another sphere of labour " ; yet in the face of this,
the Committee declined his suggestions — whereupon he wrote his
^^^^ptire- letter of resignation. He delayed sending it, however; and on
the very next day, Sunday, March 14th, 1830, Mr. Abel Smith,
M. P. for Herts, who " chanced " to be a worshipper at Wheler
Chapel, mentally resolved to offer him the rectory of Watton.
This " coincidence " — if such a word may be used of so signal an
instance of "particular Providence "—settled the question; and
Bickersteth was able to name a hapj^ier reason for retirement.
" I have never ceased," writes Henry Venn in the Address before
quoted from, "to regret the early dissolution of his connexion
with the office." For twenty years more, however, Bickersteth
continued the devoted friend and untiring advocate of the Society ;
and perhaps the more prominent part which he was now able to
take in the general current affairs of the Church was really of
greater value than his continuance in Salisbury Square could
have been. We shall often meet him again in these pages.
slcr'e-^' Woodroffe and Coates were now the only Secretaries ; and two
taries. vears later, 1832, Woodroffe also retired. To him succeeded
William Jowett, whose impaired health prevented the continuance
of his missionary labours in the Levant. His " overshadowed "
position in the office has been already referred to. In 1839, a
third Secretary, the Eev. T. Vores (afterwards a well-known
clergyman at Hastings), was appointed. H. Venn, then a leading
member of Committee, wrote of him : - — " He has the abilities
that we want, but whether he can stand his ground against all
circumstances is the question." In the following year Jowett
retired, and, some months later, Vores also. All this while the
dominating spirit was Dandeson Coates ; but in 1841 began the
Secretaryship of Henry Venn, and very soon the whole Society
felt that a hand was upon the helm which could be trusted to the
uttermost. That hand was destined to steer the good ship for
thirty years,
seffe"-'^'"^ After Bickersteth 's retirement, no Secretary at headquarters
taries. was Commissioned for deputation work ; and many years elapsed
before any office was created similar to that of the present Central
Secretary. But the growing demands of the ever-increasing
number of Associations led to the appointment, even in Bicker-
steth's time (1828), of a " Visiting Secretary," who held no rank in
* 111 a letter tu D. Wilson, Vicar of Islington, Lf/e o/ U. Venn, p. 103.
The Personnel of the Period 255
the Secretariat proper. A second was added two or three years Part IV.
later, and a " Lay Agent," a retired naval officer, who looked after l»24^1.
local funds, distribution of papers, &c. In 1835, for the first Chap^l9.
time, appears the title of "Association Secretaries." There were
then four, one of them being the layman, Mr. Greenway, and
another, newly appointed, being the Eev. Charles Hodgson, who
for many years w^orked Yorkshire with extraordinary energy, and
brought up the contributions of that great county to a point from
which in these later years it has actually receded. In the same
year the arrangement was first made of dividing the country into
districts — four at first, — and placing an Association Secretary in
each.
Turning now to the governing body of the Society, we find it in Members
those days very much smaller than at present. The average Com-
attendance at the General Committee in 1837 was eleven laymen "^'"ee.
(out of twenty-four elected members) and eight of the subscribing
clergymen. The Committee of Correspondence, upon which, as
now, fell the labour of detailed administration of the Missions,
consisted nominally of the twenty-four lay members of the General
Committee and of six or eight clergymen ; and the average atten-
dance in that year, in which they met forty-three times, w^as
eleven. But there were good and strong men among those who
by their regular attendance really governed the Society. Henry
Venn, in the Address before referred to, mentions in particular
Sir James Stephen, son of the James Stephen whom we met Leading
with in our earlier chapters, father of the famous judge of recent '^y""^"-
times and of Mr. Leshe Stephen, and author of the Essays
in Ecclesiastical Biography. He was a high official in the
Colonial Office, and subsequently became an Under-Secretary
of State and Professor of Modern History at Cambridge.
He was a valuable member of the Committee for nine yearg.
Mr. W. A. Garratt, an able barrister, was for twenty-three
years a regular attendant, and seems to have had exceptional
influence in the Society's counsels. The legal profession was
also represented by W. Blair, John Poynder, E. V. Sidebottoci,
W. Grane, and W. Dugmore, Q.C. Among other leading lay
members, W. M. Forster should be mentioned, who, with his wife,
was wrecked, and drowned, off the Welsh coast in 1831 ; Dr.
John Mason Good, " a physician of high reputation in medical
literature, and a scholar acquainted with seventeen languages";
E. J. Bunyon, a leading financial member; Sir George Grey,
afterwards the well-known Whig Home Secretary ; and Dr. John
Whiting (uncle of the Rev. J. B. Whiting), who acted as honorary
medical adviser. Very early, too, the Indian civil and mihtary
services began to furnish valuable members, as they have done
ever since. Colonel Phipps, General Latter, Major Mackworth,
and J. H. Harington, were among the first ; but the most
important and influential member from India was J. M. Strachan,
who had been Treasurer of the Madras Corresponding Committee,
members.
Wilson,
256 The Personnel of the Period
Part IV. and who, from 1830 onward, was for nearly forty years in the
1824^41. forefront of the Society's leaders. Captain the Hon. P. Maude,
Chap^l9. -^;^^ joined the Committee in 1833, and therefore belongs to the
period under review ; but his great services for more than half a
century will be more suitably noticed hereafter. Among the
Clerical clerical members of the period, Venn particularly mentions James
'"'"" °'" Hough, the former chaplain in Tinnevelly, with " his unim-
passioned but warm-hearted sentiments " ; M. M. Preston, with
his "grave aspect, affectionate heart, thinking head, but slow
speech " ; C. Smalley the elder, w4th his " solid, practical sense,
and singleness of eye to the will and glory of the great Head of
the Church." To these we may add Joseph Fenn, who, invalided
from Travancore, was one of the most regular and revered
members from 1830 to 1875 ; and Thomas and John Harding, the
latter afterwards Bishop of Bombay. Among occasional but
highly-valued attendants from the country were Chancellor Eaikes,
Professors Farish and Scholefield, J. W. Cunningham, and Hal-
dane Stewart. But foremost of all among the clergy, during the
Daniel first half of our period, was Daniel Wilson, whose appointment to
the Bishopric of Calcutta in 1832 will come before us in an early
chapter. In 1824 he became Vicar of Islington, and the wonder-
ful expansion of Church work in that great parish dates from that
year. In 1828 he established the Islington Church Missionary
Association, which has ever since been one of the most active and
fruitful of all the Associations,"' and has long raised £3000 a year
for the Society.
Among the Vice-Presidents, Venn specially mentions as valued
helpers Lord Bexley (the Mr. Vansittart who had been Chancellor
of the Exchequer), who gave important counsel to the Society
regarding its finances, and for many years was a leader in several
of the religious societies ; Charles Grant, Lord Glenelg, son of
Charles Grant the elder, and President of the Board of Control
(India Oftice) ; Sir Thomas Baring, Sir George Eose, Sir Eobert
Inglis, Mr. (afterw^ards Sir) T. Fowell Buxton, James Stephen the
elder, and, of course, Wilberforce. Lord Ashley, afterwards the
great Earl of Shaftesbury, became a Vice-President in 1837.
The Treasurer, throughout the whole period, was John Thornton,
nephew of the Henry Thornton who was the first holder of the
office.
Death or In 1833, the Society suffered the loss of its first President, Admiral
Gambler. Lord Gambier.f in his seventy-seventh year. " His Christian
character," wrote Pratt in the Bcgister, " was strongly marked by
simplicity and spirituality. His ardent zeal for the Kingdom of
Christ led him ever to take a lively interest in the Society's pro-
ceedings." The Committee, in the following year, nominated the
* Of this Association, the Author was Hon. Seci'etaiy I'roni 1874 to 1880,
and had the pri^-ilege of arranging its Jubilee, whicli was celebrated on
January 17th, 187 8, 'a special extra fund being raised of ilOOO.
t See p. 108.
Vice-
Presidents.
The Personnel of the Period 2^7
Marquis of Cholrriondeley as his successor ; but that excellent Part IV.
Christian nobleman declined on the score of health. Then they 1^^^-41.
approached the Earl of Chichester, Henry Thomas Pelham, a ^^^^P" ^^-
Captain in the Eoyal Horse Guards, who had just completed his The Eari of
thirtieth year. " Led," wrote his friend Mr. Alexander Beattio in Chichester.
1886 (the year of his death), "in comparatively early life, under
the influence of one of the Society's friends, to accept for himself
the fulness and freeness of the Gospel of Christ, it was his desire,
since that happy union with his precious Saviour, to make that
Gospel known at home and abroad." The friend here referred to
was Charles Hodgson, who had been a hunting comrade of his at
Cambridge. He and the young nobleman had together dedicated
themselves to the service of Christ in the churchyard of the
Northumberland parish of which Hodgson w^as curate.'''
The young Earl accepted the post of President on Christmas
Eve, 1834, and in the following May he presided for the first His first
time at the Annual Meeting. After a modest reference to him- speech,
self, he spoke the following wise and stirring w^ords : —
" A great deal was heard at the present day of the danger to which
the Church of England was exposed from its political and outward foes.
He thought, however, they need not be afraid of such foes as these. If
the Church of England were indeed found zealously engaged in the
work of her Lord, He would be on her side, and who could be against
her ? If she was zealously engaged in the missionary cause, then indeed
the Lord of hosts would be with her, and the God of Jacob would be
her refuge. But was there not cause to fear with respect to our
national and beloved Church, that on account of her neglected oppor-
tunities in spreading abroad that knowledge and light which God had
vouchsafed her, a long account against her was recorded in heaven ?
When they considered their great national wealth, their many facilities
of communication with other nations, the repeated and still-continued
removal of obstacles and impediments to the missionary cause in
different parts of the British possessions, and when also they looked
over the map of the world, and traced upon it the wide territory of
British dominion, and still wider one of British influence, — was there
* Canon Tristram writes to the Author as follows : — " The story of Charles
Hodgson's and Lord Chichester's conversion as told me first by the late
Gr. T. Pox, was this : — They had been great friends at Cambridge, and both
were beautiful horsemen and keen huntsmen. Lord Pelham (as he then
was) went on a visit to his friend Hodgson, who had recently been ordained
to the curacy of St. John Lee, near Hexham. He was already under serious
impressions, and Hodgson was very anxious to do his duty as a clergyman.
One day they had been out hunting together, and after putting up their
horses, sauntered into the churchyard. They happened to sit upon an altar
tombstone, and talked. At length they mutually vowed to give themselves
to Christ, as they had never done before, and knelt down by the stone to
pray and seal their vows together. From that day forward they were new
men. Once when I was staying with Lord Chichester at Stanmer, I ventured
to hint at the story, and asked him if he remembered his visit to St. John
Lee. He said he did indeed, and if he were there he could take me straight
to the tombstone, near the south-west end of the church." See also Lord
Chichester's Reminiscences of Hodgson, Christian Observer, October, 1872,
p. 747.
VOL. I. S
2^8
The Personnel oe the Period
Tart IV.
1824-41.
Chap. 19.
Bishops.
The two
Sumners.
Preachers
of the
Annual
Sermons.
not some cause for shame and for fear, lest God, in His justice, might
call them to a severe account for the time which had been wasted, and
the mercies which had been so long abused ?
" Amid those gratulations which ought to be raised upon occasions
like the present, when they celebrated the triumphs gained by this and
other Christian efforts over the jjowers of darkness, they had also to feel
some degree of contrition for the little which had hitherto been done.
If God were to call them to a strict account, He might reason with them
as He did with His people of old, ' What more can I do for my vineyard
than I have done ; and yet when I looked for grapes, wherefore brought it
forth wild grapes ? ' They might, indeed, thank God that in His mercy
He had enabled this Society to bear some fruit, which proved it to be a
branch of the true vine under the culture of the Divine Husbandman ;
but, alas ! what was that Society when compared with the whole body of
the Church to which it belonged P Let those who really loved the
Church of England earnestly pray that it might please God to shed
abroad in her a missionary spii'it. He prayed that that Church might
remember the debt of gratitude which she owed to her great Head,
preserver, and Redeemer.''
Little did the great assembly that day think that the tall young
nobleman in the chair would remain President for fifty-one years,
and only miss one Anniversary in the whole of that time ! Never
surely did any Society possess for so long a period a President
so sagacious, so large-hearted, so true to his Divine Lord, so
justly honoured and revered by all who had the privilege — a
privilege indeed ! — -of coming in contact with him.
During the period under review, several Bishops joined the
Society ; and some who did not formally do so testified their
sympathy in other ways. Bishop Barrington of Durham, for
instance, bequeathed £500 to the funds. In 1840, there were
eight Vice-Patrons holding English sees, and four holding
sees abroad. Two should be specially named, who became
warm and most valuable friends : Charles Kichard Sumner,
Bishop of Winchester, and John Bird Sumner, Bishop of Chester
and afterwards Archbishop of Canterbury. These two good men
threw themselves heart and soul into the service of the leading
religious institutions, and year by year they spoke at meeting after
meeting, especially at those of the Church Missionary, Jews', and
Bible Societies.
The brothers Sumner were both preachers of the C.M.S.
Annual Sermon, in 1825 and 1828 respectively. J. B. Sumner,
who came first, was only Prebendarj^ of Durham when he
preached. Charles E. Sumner was appointed at the very next
Anniversary after his accession to the see he so long adorned. It
cannot be said that either of their sermons was remarkable. The
two that came between them, in 1826 and 1827, by Edward
Cooper and Henry Budd, two excellent country rectors, are much
more impressive to read. The latter in particular, is a striking
exposition of 2 Cor. v. 20, " Now then we are ambassadors for
Christ." It will be remembered that it was under Budd that
John West, the first C.M.S. missionary to the Red Indians, had
The Personnel of the Period 2 5q
served as curate, and that West baptized his first Indian pupil by the Part IV.
name of his old rector. Budd opens his sermon with an apology 1824-41.
for appearing as a substitute for " a well-tried labourer in the Chap^l9.
vineyard of the Gospel in a foreign clime." This was no doubt
Thomason, who was then at home, but too ill to undertake such
a duty. The Minutes of the period show that several eminent
clergymen were asked at various times to preach the Annual
Sermon who were unable to do so, and who in fact never did :
among them Archbishop Trench of Tuam, then the one episcopal Names
patron in Ireland ; Copleston, Provost of Oriel, and afterwards "hissing.
Bishop of Llandaff; Dean Davys, of Chester; Archdeacons
Browne and Law ; John Hambleton of Islington ; and Haldane
Stewart. The absence from the list of this last name, one so
universally honoured in Evangelical circles, is strange ; and so is
the absence of the name of Daniel Wilson the younger, who
succeeded his father, the Bishop of Calcutta, in the Vicarage of
Ishngton in 1832, and held it for more than half a century. Pratt
was repeatedly invited to undertake the Sermon, but always
declined such an honour. The last attempt to persuade him was
made in 1832, by Jowett, who appealed to him as the Society's
" Moses " : — " You have seen, first, the day of small things ; then a
day of surprising success, which elated many ; then the chastise-
ment of the Lord our God (Deut. xi. 2) ; now, I do believe, a day
of humble awe and believing enlargement. Point out to us, I pray
you, guidance and encouragements for a little longer. Write us a
Christian Deuteronomy (Ps. Ixxi. 17, 18)." But the appeal was
in vain.
The other preachers during the period now under review were
Dr. J. H. Singer, afterwards Bishop of Meath, 1829 ; Dr.
Pearson, Dean of Salisbury, whom we have l^efore met in this
History, 1830 ; John Graham, of York, 1831 ; Edward Bickersteth,
1832 ; Archdeacon Bather, of Salop, 1833 ; Professor Scholefield,
of Cambridge, 1834 ; the Hon. Baptist W. Noel, 1835 ; Arch-
deacon Spooner, of Coventry (brother-in-law of Wilberforce, and
father of Archbishop Tait's wife), 1836 ; Thomas Dale, afterwards
Vicar of St. Pancras, 1837 ; Francis Goode, son of the W. Goode
whom we have met as one of the Society's founders, 1838 ; J. N.
Pearson, w^ho had been Principal of the C.M.S. College, 1839 ;
Chancellor Eaikes, of Chester, 1840 ; Francis Close of Chelten-
ham, afterwards Dean of Carlisle, 1841.
Of these thirteen sermons, two, those of F. Goode and F. Close,
will come under our notice hereafter. Three others call for special
attention, those of Bickersteth, Baptist Noel, and Dale. The
brothers Noel, Gerard and Baptist, were two of the most power-
ful speakers and preachers of the day. The Register contains
many extracts from their speeches and sermons, which give a
high idea of their fervid eloquence. Baptist Noel's sermon in Baptist
1835 is in many ways a great one. It is evident that India was ^?mo^n.
much upon his heart, and for India he pleads with a fulness of
s 2
26o The Personnel of the Period
Part IV. knowledge rarely seen among men who have not been there, and
1824-41. evincing his intimate acquaintance with the current history of the
Chap. 19. Missions. But what at the present day particularly arrests our
attention is his partial anticipation of the "Own Missionary"
plan which, after sixty years, has latterly been adopted with so
much promise of blessing. He indulges in what then seemed the
wild imagination of the Society being able to send to India One
Hundred Missionaries in the next twelve months, and draws a
striking picture of the effects, dkect and indirect, of such a forward
step, calculating that, as one of the results, there would probably,
in twenty years, be 16,190 evangelists, European and Native, preach-
ing the Gospel in India. Then he asks, " But can it be done? "
An " Own '"' I answer : It can be done at once, and easily. Among all the friends
Mission- of the Society, are there not fifty at least, who, without foregoing a
ary ' plan, j^-^^^.^g comfort which they now enjoy, without sacrificing what is more to
tliem than the weekly penny contributed by the labourer, or the annual
poimd by the domestic servant, could each contribute £".300 to the
maintenance of • one additional Missionary in India ? One generous
person has already signified her intention, henceforth, to do so for New
Zealand. Will not twenty-five more be found to follow that Christian
example for India ? Thus twenty-five Missionaries might be sent. Among
the larger and more wealthy parishes and congregations, with which some
of our Missionary Associations are connected, are there not at least fifty,
in which ten persons might add £10 to their annual subscriptions; one
hundred persons £1 ; and two hundred more 10s. ; without involving them-
selves in any painful sacrifice, or in the least diminishing their contribu-
tions to any home object ? Each such parish, or congregation, could
maintain one additional Missionary. If there are fifty who could do it,
will not twenty-five be found generous enough to make the example, and
thus add twenty-five Missionaries to India ? Further— among the young
men who take a benevolent interest in our Missions, are there notfifty who,
at their own cost, might give ten years to Missionary labours, as some
in their circumstances do, to travel for their pleasure ? If so, will not
ten be found sufliciently devoted to do it I" Thus, sixty new Missionaries
might be raised ; and with these examples before them, surely the other
Associations of this great Society would not find it difficult to provide
for the remaining forty : — and thus a hundred additional Missionaries
might be sent out within the year. ...
"I believe that, if a hundred devoted men did go, it would infuse an
unction into the ministry of thousands in this land, inspire our prayers
with fervency, unlock the refused treasure, make Christians love each
other, and, being equally the eftect and the pledge of an enlarged bless-
ing from God, would multiply conversions in our congregations, and,
rebuking the wordliness of multitudes, form a new era in the Church, to be
nuirked by a holier ardour, and a moi-e self-denying energy in the whole
course of Christian duty.
'•' Only let the experiment be made. In this congregation are probably
numbers who have influence with various Associations ; some who are
possessed of wealth ; and some who are Ministers of Christ. Will you,
then, in the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, to the utmost, by example
and by argument, animate our Associations, generally, to provide the
Heathen with a hundred additional Missionaries within the next year ?
In the name of a world of sinners, I ask it of you : I ask it in the name
of Christ."
The Personnel of the Period 261
Two years later, in 1837, Thomas Dale, who was then Vicar Part IV.
of St. Bride's and therefore preached in his own church, took up i^'^^^lq
the same idea, and worked it out more nearly as has been done in '
our own day. If , he says, a true standard of self-sacrifice were Dale also
followed, then — -"^Own
" Not a f ew amonp; ns . . . would have e«cA his own special representa- ^^^^y
live ministering the Gospel to the Heathen, scattering among them, in
his stead, the seed of life, and thus supplying his lack of personal
service. . . .
" But next, there is a principle of combination, which is so often in-
juriously, that it might well be, for once, profitably a^jplied. Where the
burden is too heavy for one, whj' should not two, or four, or six, if
linked together in close bonds of kindred, or by the closer tie of
Christian brotherhood, combine to maintain their own Missionary '^
Why should not the various members of families, whom God hath
blessed, he led thus to ofter a living tribute to His praise 'i . . .
" But if, again, there are many instances of disciples who can bestow
largely, but not to this extent, is not the principle which we have laid
down especially applicable to congregations ? Cannot the Pastor urge
upon his flock to adopt, as the lowest, such a scale of congregational con-
tributions as shall ensure for them one who shall represent them in the
benighted empire of ignorance, and among the godless hordes of idolatry
and superstition 'f Why should not the sword of the Spirit be unsheathed,
why should not the banner of Salvation be unfurled, at their proper
cost, and in their special name, by some intrepid warrior of Christ ; who
has abjured home, with all its comforts — kindred, with all its charities —
society, with all its indulgencies and delights — country, with all the ties
which it entwines so tenaciously around the heart, in order to be their
delegate in the great work of preaching the Word of God Y In the
turbulent pei^od of our own national history, when Liberty was struggling
to the birth, but there was no strength to bring forth, and the State,
in sore travail, was compelled to maintain a precarious existence at
the point of sword and spear ; — every adequate portion of land
sent forth its own warrior, armed and equipped to battle, for his
country's honour, and his own dear domestic hearth ; — and for these,
even the vassals of arbitrary power would contend, as though they were
freemen like ourselves, and struck for liberty. Cannot something like
this be accomplished, in this noblest of causes, by the voluntary enei'gies
of the Chiu'ch ? Cannot the parish which sent one, or the city which
furnished perhaps a hundred, warriors, provide a single Missionary Y . . .
" Oh ! if one thousand congregations were thus stirred up throughout
the land, in our own Church alone, to say nothing of other denomina-
tions of Christians ; nay, if one-half this number, not one in twenty,
throughout the empire, were kindled, as by a tongue of fire glanced from
heaven, into this divine work of faith and labour of love, then would our
calculation be complete ; — then would flow into the desolate wastes of
Heathenism a full and gracious tide, not of seventy, but of seven hundred
Missionaries, to testify among all nations the wonderful works of God."
Bickersteth's sermon, preached two years after his retirement ^' t?'.'^'^^'''
from the Secretariat, has of course a special interest. It is the sermon.
only Annual Sermon ever preached by an ex- Secretary. His
biographer. Professor Birks, says : "His sense of the great im-
portance of the occasion led him to bestow much pains on the
sermon, and his elder children can recollect his reading it aloud
262 The Personnel of the Period
Part TV. to them in private, more than once, to discover any defects, and
Ch"''~^iq '""^ more famihar with it in the puWic dehvery. His text was
^^' ' Ps. Ixvii. 1, 2, which he apphed to the British Nation, to the
Chm-ch of England, and to the Church Missionary Society. He
enlarged on the high privileges of om- country, its providential
opportunities, and grievous sins ; the past revival of the Church,
and its remaining weakness and corruption ; the growth of mis-
sionary zeal, and its scanty means compared with the immense
expenditure on mere luxuries and sinful pleasures ; the fearful
wants and darkness of the Heathen world, and the hlessings that
would flow to it from an extensive revival of true religion in our
Church and Nation ; with the means by which these blessings
might be secured— prayer, personal devotedness, and their com-
bined influence on the hearts and minds of others." Bickersteth
himself wrote : " God carried me through my duties with much
mercy. I preached an hour and three-quarters — the longest
sermon I ever preached in my life — but the interest seemed to be
kept up in a crowded congregation to the end."
The Sermon, however, had long ere this exchanged places in
importance with the Annual Meeting ; and the enhanced interest
of tlie latter became more manifest when Exeter Hall was opened
in 1831 — of which more in the next chapter. Indeed, in 1836,
the Society had to hold an overflow meeting in the Lower Hall ;
and in 1839 an Evening Meeting was added for the first time.
Speakers The lists of Speakers year by year are interesting to look over.
Annual In the twenty-scvcn years, from 1815, when Ereemasons' Hall
Meetings, ^yas first taken, including sixteen meetings in that Hall and nine
in Exeter Hall, the same names occur again and again : Bishop
Eyder fourteen times, the two Bishops Sumner (in twelve years)
nine times each, the Marquis of Cholmondeley nine times, Lord
Calthorpe eight times, J. W. Cunningham sixteen times, Wilberforce
eight times, Daniel Wilson seven times, Gerard Noel eight times,
Charles Simeon only four times (but much more often for the
Jews' Society), Haldane Stewart five times. Baptist Noel four
times, C. J. Hoare four times, Bickersteth six times. Charles
Grant the younger (Lord Glenelg) spoke three times. Lord Bexley
three times, Fowell Buxton four times. Sir Eobert Inglis five
times in this period. Sir George Grey once. Lord Chichester
(before his appointment as President) once. Professor Scholefield
three times. Hugh Stowell first appears in 1833, and he then
spoke every year except one for seven years. Hugh McNeile
spoke in 1827 and 1828, but not again in this period. Francis
Close made his first C.M.S. speech in 1839. Henry Venn spoke
once only, in 1833. Bishop Bathurst of Norwich spoke in 1818,
Bishop Ward of Sodor and Man in 1828, Bishop Turner of Cal-
cutta in 1829, Bishop Mcllvaine of Ohio in 1835, Bishop Corrie
of Madras in 1835, Bishop Otter of Chichester in 1837, Bishop
Longley of Eipon in 1838, Bishop Denison of Salisbury in 1841.
Samuel Wilberforce, afterwards Bishop of Oxford, appeared for the
The Personnel of the Period 263
first time in 1840. It has been a very rare thing for men not Part IV.
of the Enghsli Church to speak at the C.M.S. Anniversary; but iH2-t-4l.
Bkunhardt, the Director of the Basle Seminary, spoke in ^^^^' '
1822, Alexander Duff in 1836, and Merle D'Aubignc in 1838. It
is very likely that Duff's appearance drew the crowd which
necessitated the overflow meeting before mentioned. His speech
is one of the finest ever delivered in Exeter Hall.''' It is interest-
ing to observe that Captain Allen Gardiner also was a speaker in
the same year, just when he was persuading the Society to engage
in a Mission to the Zulus. It will be asked, But where were the
C.M.S. missionaries all this time? It is rather surprising to find
so few in the lists, considering that many had come home in the
'twenties and 'thirties ; but the only names are Jowett and
Hartley of Malta, Eaban of Sierra Leone, Fenn and Doran of
Travancore, Yate of New Zealand, Gobat of Abyssinia, and John
Tucker of Madras.
This brings us to the most important of all branches of the
■personnel, the missionaries themselves. Among the two hundred Jion^/eJ
sent out in the period under review, from 1824 to 1840, there
are over seventy whose names must be recorded ; and the
lengthened services of some of them are remarkable. Of Daniel Long
the Prophet we read that " this Daniel continued" ; and truly the
same thing may be said of many of the missionaries sent forth at
this time. Two " continued " sixty or more years ; five, over fifty
years ; twelve, forty or more years ; nineteen, thirty or more
years. Noble service was rendered, as has been before stated, by the
Basle Missionary Seminary, in supplying some of the ablest and
most devoted missionaries. From it, prior to 1841, went forth, Basiemen.
to West Africa, Hansel (10 years), Schon (20), Schlenker (16),
Graf (19), Biiltmann (22); to West Africa and afterwards to New
Zealand, Kissling, who became one of Bishop Selwyn's Arch-
deacons (33) ; to the Levant, Egypt, and Abyssinia, Gobat,
afterwards Bishop of Jerusalem (17 years under C.M.S.), Lieder
(35), Krusc (35), Schlienz (16), Hildner of Syra (45) ; to Abyssinia
and afterwards India, Isenberg (32), and Blumhardt (40) ; to
Abyssinia and East Africa, Krapf the explorer (19) ; to India, Deerr
(24), Schaffter (30), Weitbrecht (21), Kriickeberg (27), Leupolt (42),
Lincke (36), C. C. Menge (38), J. P. Menge (30) ; to India, and
afterwards to Smyrna, Jetter (22). Most of these came from Basle
to Islington, received further training in the Church Missionary
College, and were ordained by the Bishop of London. Another
valuable band of Germans from Basle went to the north-west of
Persia under the Basle Society, but on the conquest by Eussia of
the district they worked in, and their consequent expulsion, they
joined the C.M.S. iVmong these were Schneider (37 years),
Hoernle (42), Kreiss (16), who went to India ; Pfander, the great
missionary to Mohammedans, who lalx)ured in India and Turkey
(25) ; and Wolters of Smyrna (39).
* See p. 310.
264 The Personnel of the Period
Part IV. Among the English missionaries sent forth from the Church
Ph^^q ^^issionary College in the period were, to West iVfrica, Warhm-ton
^ (20 years), Townsend (40), Beale (19), Peyton (15), Isaac Smith
Islington (18), Denton (16) ; to India, Farrar, father of the Dean of Canter-
bmy (19), Sandys (41), W. Smith (41), Peet (33), Pettitt (22),
Harley (35), Thomas (34), Stephen Hobbs, afterwards in
Mauritius (38), Hawksworth (23), James Long (32) ; to Ceylon,
Oakley, who in half a century never once returned home (51) ;
to New Zealand, Hamhn, the first student in the College (40),
C. Baker (46), A. N. Brown, afterwards Archdeacon (55), Matthews
(52, and 12 as emeritus in the country), Ashwell (49), and
Burrows (57) ; to North-West America, Cockran, afterwards
Archdeacon, who never once came home (40), and Cowley, after-
wards Archdeacon (47).
Among the English missionaries, several of whom were men-
tioned in earlier chapters, who went forth before the Islington
College was opened, — or after its opening, without its training, —
°erv1cis"^ some also had long periods of service : in Africa, J. W. Weeks,
afterwards Bishop of Sierra Leone (21, and 2 as Bishop) ; in
India, Norton (25), B. Bailey (34), H. Baker (47), M. Wilkinson
(24), J. S. S. Eobertson (39) ; in Ceylon, J. Knight (22), J.Bailey
(24), and W. Adley, who afterwards lived in England to the age
of ninety-seven (22) ; to New Zealand, G. Clarke (21), Henry
Williams, afterwards Archdeacon (45), E. Davis (40), T. Chapman
(46), J. A. Wilson (35), Morgan (33).
University _ Up to 1841, the missionaries from the Universities w^ere few
indeed, only sixteen altogether. There were six from Oxford,
Connor and Hartley, of the Mediterranean Mission ; William
WiUiams, afterwards Bishop of Waiapu (53 years), 0. Hadfield,
afterwards Bishop of Wellington (55, and still surviving emeritus),
and H. H. Bolxart, of New Zealand ; and John Tucker, of Madras
(14). Cambridge sent seven, W. Jowett, 12th Wrangler, of
Malta (15) ; E. Taylor (38), of New Zealand ; P. Wybrow, G.
Valentine, 1st Class Classics and Sen. Opt., and J. Chapman,
27th Wrangler (13), of India ; J. F. Haslam, 9th Wrangler, of
Ceylon (11) ; and F. Owen, of the brief Zulu Mission. And there
were three from Trinity College, Dublin, viz., Doran of Travancore,
J. H. Gray of Madras (10), and E. Maunsell of New Zealand (30
years under C.M.S., and 30 as Archdeacon). Some of these did
not have long careers ; but Wybrow, Valentine, and Haslam died
early at their posts ; Jowett, Tucker, and Chapman became
Secretaries of the Society ; while Doran was an Association
Secretary for thirteen years, and J. H. Gray for twenty-two
years. Upon the whole, therefore, the Society and its cause owed
much to these sixteen University men. In 1841, the year to
which properly our enumeration ought to extend, come the dis-
tinguished names of Fox and Noble ; but they may be left to the
next period.
At this point the new Church Missionary College — or, as it was
men
The Personnel of the Period 265
originally called, Institution— may be conveniently introduced. t-ARTiy.
The considerations that led to its being established have been ^J^/g
already brielly noticed.- They are stated at length, and, in view Jl_
of the doubts expressed by many friends, with obvious care, in Church
the Eeport of 1823. No other Society has ever followed this J^^'°'''
example. Both the S.P.G. on one side, and the Denominations College,
on the other, have looked to independent institutions for the
training of their missionaries. In the case of S.P.G. , St. Augus-
tine's College, Canterbury, has, since its foundation in 1848, been
a chief source of supply." It was not because the Church Mis-
sionary Society has had a peculiar difficulty in getting University
men that its own College has been necessary. On the contrary,
a very large majority of the University men who have gone out as
missionaries to the Heathen at all have gone out in connexion
with C.M.S., and C.M.S. has had a larger proportion of graduates
on its roll than any other of the greater Societies.! Nevertheless,
the experience of seventy years has fully vindicated the wisdom
and foresight of Josiah Pratt in projecting the Islington College.
No other missionary institution in the world has such a roll of
distinguished names. Those enumerated above belong only to
its iirst sixteen vears. Later vears added largely to the list.
The selection'^of Islington as the locale for the College proved a J^s locale,
, . 1 1 z Islington.
happy one. Probably the choice was a natural consequence of
Bickersteth and his students being already in Barnsbury Park ;
but it is very likely that the expectation of Daniel ^yilson's early
succession to the vicarage also influenced the Society. The
advowson had been bequeathed to him by his uncle, whose
property it was ; and the old vicar, Dr. Strahan, " under whom,"
says Wilson's biographer, "Islington slept," was not likely to
survive long. In fact he died in the very year (1824) after the
ground was purchased, so that when the Institution was actually
opened, it was welcomed bv a vicar who was at that time the
most influential clergyman on the Committee. The inauguration Jt^/^'^f "&"-
took place on January 31st, 1825, on which occasion the passage
of Scripture read was very happily chosen. It was Isa. liv., in
which occurs Carey's famous text, " Enlarge the place of thy
tent, and let them stretch forth the curtains of thine habitations :
spare not, lengthen thy cords, and strengthen thy stakes."
Excellent addresses were given to the asseml)led friends by the
newly-appointed Principal, the Eev. J. Norman Pearson, of
Trinity College, Cambridge, and to the students (twelve in
number) by Bickersteth. [ But at first no new building was
erected upon the ground purchased; only the house already
standing on it (still the Principal's house) was used. In the
following year, however, it was determined to build a real college,
* See p. 244.
t Of course, small bands of University men, as in the Oxford and
Cambridge Missions in India, do not come into such a comparison,
t Printed v>:rhatuii in the Report of 1825.
266 The Personnel of the Period
Part IV. to accommodate if necessary fifty students, with hall, library,
1824r-4l. lecture-rooms, &c. ; and on July 31st, 1826, the first stones (there
'^^' were two, one at the base of each of the central pillars) were
laid by the President, Lord Gambler. On the same day, the
students (twenty-six ; of whom six were already in orders) were
Its studies, examined before the Committee in Latin, Greek, Divinity, Logic,
and Mathematics. The languages of the Mission-field were then
regarded as an important part of the studies, and three months
later, another Examination took place of the Oriental Classes
conducted by Professor S. Lee, in Hebrew, Arabic, Sanscrit, and
Bengali.
Its first The first Principal, the Eev. J. Norman Pearson, of Trinity
Principal. College, Cambridge, was a good and able man ; but in the in-
experience of the Committee, and every one else concerned, in the
conduct of such an institution, grave differences of opinion arose
as to the methods of training. An Investigation Committee,
appointed at a time of financial pressure to examine into the
Society's expenditure (as we shall see hereafter), included the
College within their purview, and recommended considerable
alterations. It was these differences that caused so much distress
to Bickersteth, as before mentioned, and undoubtedly led to his
contemplating retirement. Yet the changes ultimately decided on
were in the direction of his own views. The Institution was to
be less of a College and more of a Home, and the academical
element was to be distinctly subordinate to the spiritual element.*
In the course of the discussions Mr. Pearson resigned the
Principalship, but afterwards he withdrew his resignation, and
continued Principal till 1838. He then retired, on his appoint-
ment to the Incumbency of Tunbridge Wells. The Bishop of
London (Blomfield) took the opportunity to express his high
opinion of the College and its Principal. " He remarked that he
had been much struck with the comprehensiveness of the
theological knowledge acquired by the students, and with the
judiciousness of the mode in which it had been imparted ; and
added that the Society's students had been among his best
candidates." The Eev. C. F. Childe, Head Master of Walsall
Grammar School, was appointed to succeed Pearson, and for
twenty years proved a Principal whose devotion and success have
never been surpassed.
Deaths of It Only remains to mention the deaths of this period. That of
the President, Lord Gambler, has been already mentioned. In
1831, died Basil Woodd, whose great services from the very first
have been frequently referred to ; in 1833, James Stephen the
elder, and Charles Elliott, the veteran member of Committee ; \
in 1834, Lord Teignmouth, President of the Bible Society, and
that excellent lady, Hannah More, who had for so long exercised
* See Report of 1830; and the Appendix, in which the new Regulations for
the Institution aie printed in full,
t See p. 70.
friends.
The Personnel of the Period 267
a powerful influence among rich and poor in tlie cause of Part IV.
true religion, and who bequeathed the Society £1000; in 1836, 182-4-41.
Bishop Eyder, and in 1837, Bishop Bathurst, the first two '^^'"P- ^^-
prelates to join the Society ; in 1838, Zachary Macaulay, and
Biddulph of Bristol. The deaths of Heber, Corrie, and Carey
will come before us in reviewing India, and those of Morrison
and Marsden in reviewing China and New Zealand. Departed
missionaries also will be referred to under the various Missions.
But two other deaths must be more particularly mentioned in
closing this chapter, those of William Wilberforce and Charles
Simeon.
Wilberforce and Simeon had been contemporaries in a very wiiber-
marked sense. They were born in the same year, 1759. They simlon.*^
were not together at Cambridge, as Wilberforce went there very
young ; but they entered on their respective life-works nearly Their
together, Simeon preaching his first sermon only a few months fives'^^^
after Wilberforce made his first speech in Parliament. Wilber-
force's conversion to God occurred a few years later than Simeon's ;
but the opposition and ridicule they encountered in their respective
circles were simultaneous. As w^e have seen, it was to these two
men that Charles Grant and his associates at Calcutta specially
addressed their first appeal for a Bengal Mission. At the very
time that Simeon wrote his paper on Missions for the Eclectic
Society, Wilberforce was writing his Practical View of Christianity.
The one led to the foundation of the Church Missionary Society.
The other had an influence quite unique on Christian life in
England. Together in spirit, though in widely different sur-
roundings and by very different methods, they laboured for the
extension of true religion at home and for the spread of the
Gospel abroad. Together they spoke at the first great public
Anniversary Meeting held by the Church Missionary Society, in
1813. They both spent their fortunes for the good of Church and
people. Wilberforce was far more outwardly successful in his Their
lifetime. The extraordinary fascination of his social qualities [nflu^nce^
made him personally popular even among those who sneered at
his religion ; while Simeon's personal influence, though very
great within his own circle, never made him a generally popidar
man. But Simeon has been, indirectly, a greater power in the
Church of England ; especially through the Simeon Trust, which
has secured Evangelical teaching in perpetuity for some of the
most important parishes in England. Wilberforce died three
years before Simeon ; but it is a question whether the impressive
scene at Westminster x\bbey on August 5th, 1833, w^hen all that Their
was distinguished in Church and State gathered round the gi'ave ""^""^ ^"
of the most eminent Christian the British Parliament has ever
known, was one whit more significant than the scene in King's
Chapel at Cambridge on November 19tli, 1836, when the liody of
the man who had so long stood nearly alone in his witness for
Christ, despised and hated by town and gown alike, was followed
!68
The Personnel of the Period
]'ART IV.
1824-41.
Chap. 19.
Ctephen
on 'Wilber-
force.
Macaulay
and
Stephen
on Simeon.
to its last resting-place by the whole University and a multitude
of other mourners.
Of Wilberforce, Sir James Stephen, in one of the most brilliant
of his brilliant Essays, says :=■' — •
'' Of the schemes of public benevolence which were matured or
projected during the half-century which followed the peace of 1783,
there was scarcely one of any magnitude in which Mr. Wilberforce was
not largely engaged. Whether churches and clergymen were to be multi-
plied, or the Scriptures circulated, or missions sent to the ends of the
earth, or national education established, or the condition of the poor
improved, or Ireland civilized, or good discipline established in gaols, or
obscure genius and piety enabled to emerge, or in whatever other form
philanthropy and patriotism laboured for the improvement of the
country or of the world, — his sanction, his eloquence, his advice were
still regarded as indispensable to success."
"What, asks the same writer, was the secret of his power ?
" It is to be found in that unbroken communion with the indwelling
God, in which Mr. Wilberforce habitually lived. He ' endured as seeing
Him who is invisible,' and as hearing Him who is inaudible. When
most immersed in political cares, or in social enjoyments, he invoked and
obeyed the Voice which directed his path while it tranquillized his
mind. That Voice . . . taught him to rejoice, as a child, in the
presence of a Father whom he much loved and altogether trusted, and
whose approbation was infinitely more than an equivalent for whatever
restraint, self-denial, labour, or sacrifice, obedience to His will might
render necessary."
Of Simeon, Lord Macaulay wrote, "If you knew what his
authority and influence were, and how they extended from
Cambridge to the remotest corners of England, you would allow
that his real sway over the Church was far greater than that of
any Primate." f Sir James Stephen suggested that the Church
of England should turn out of the catalogue of her saints such
doubtful figures as St. George, St. Dunstan, and St. Crispin, to
make room for " St. Charles of Cambridge." \ And Dr. Moule
says : § —
" As regards the Church of England, his dearly-beloved Church, he
has proved himself one of her truest servants and most effectual
defenders. Perhaps more than any other one man who ever arose
within her pale, he has been the means of showing, in words and in life,
that those Christian truths which at once most abase and most gladden
the soul, as it turns (in no conventional sense of the words) from dark-
ness to light, from death to life, from self to Christ, are not the vagaries
of a few fanatical minds, careless of order and of the past, but the
message of the Church, the tradition of her noblest teachers, the breath
and soul of her offices and order. He has shown in another direction,
under conditions of peculiar and difficult experiment, that the converted
* Essays in Ecclesiastical Biogra'pliy, Essay on Wilberforce, pp. 486, 499.
t Trevelyan's Life of Lord Macaulay, vol. i. p. 67.
X Essays in Ecclesiastical Biography, p. 578.
§ Moule's Simeon, p. 259.
The Personnel of the Period 269
life is, in its genuine development, a life of self-discipline, of considerate- Part IV.
ness for every one around, of courtesy and modesty, of hourly servitude 1824-^1.
to established duty, and of that daylight of truthfulness without which Cliap. 19.
no pietj' can possibly be wholesome."
Such were the two greatest men among the early promoters of
the Church Missionary Society. They were not its working
leaders, like John Venn and Pratt and Basil Woodd and Bickersteth
and Zachary Macaulay ; but the one was the author of the
original idea of such an organization, and the other was, of all its
public champions, the most influential and the most eloqvient.
We shall meet both Simeon and Wilberforce again in this History
in chapters that look back to incidents in their lives ; but in
ti'eating of the lyeraonncl of the period now before us, we take
occasion to l)id them both farewell.
CHAPTER XX.
The Environment of the Period.
Public Affairs — The Reform Bill and the Bishops — Accession of
Queen Victoria — Church Reform — Evangelical Improvements —
The C.P.A.S. — Growth of S.P.G. — Bishop Blomfield — Opening of
Exeter Hall — Bible Society Controversies — Prayer at Public Meet-
ings— Calvinistic Disputes — Edward Irving — Plymouth Brethren —
Prophetical Studies — Pratt warns against Disunion — The Tractarian
Movement: Keble and Newman — Attitude of the Evangelicals
and of C.M.S.
Part lY.
1824-41 .
Chap. 20.
A period
of large
changes,
On the
Ccntinent,
" Now I heseech you, brethren, hy the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, tJiat . . .
there he no dixnsions among you." — 1 Cor. i. 10.
"Lest Satan should get an adcantage of us: for ire are not iynorant of his
devices." — 2 Cor. ii. 11.
N studying the history, not of the Society's Missions,
but of the Society itself, we cannot fail to notice
how it was affected by its surroundings, in the
Country and in the World, in the State and in the
Church. And there was so much that was im-
portant and interesting in the environment during the period
we are now studying, that it seems right to devote a chapter to it.
For the leaders of the Church Missionary Society were not men
wholly absorbed in the details of the Society's business, and
uaable to pay attention to public affairs or to the general interests
of religion. On the contrary, they were men of the world in the
best sense, and took a prominent part in all movements for the
pubHc good at home and abroad.
Our period, from 1824 to 1841, was emphatically a period of
movement ; of large changes and developments. Abroad, the
reactionary influences that naturally prevailed after the fall of
Napoleon were losing their force. In 1830 the counter-forces of
revolution burst forth, replacing in France the Bourbons by the
Citizen King, and thus preparing the w^ay for the still fiercer
revolution of 1848 ; and putting on the throne of the newly-formed
kingdom of Belgium one of the wisest of modern sovereigns. On
the other hand, Russia, under Nicholas, was commencing that
forward march which, despite subsequent reverses, still continues,
and the Eastern Question came during our period into the front
rank of international difficulties ; while the too enthusiastic antici-
The Environment oe the Period 271
pations of freedom and enlightenment in the young kingdom of Part IY.
Greece and the new republics of South America gradually faded 1824-41.
away. The Church Missionary Society was not unaffected by Chap. 20.
these events. Its Turkish Missions had to be given up on account
of the turmoil in the East ; the revolutionary sj)irit, spreading to
England, started controversies which sadly interfered with the
progress of rehgious enterprises ; while at the same time, godly
men were stirred up by the alarming condition of things to work
harder than ever to preach the Gospel while there was time. " The
commotions of the kingdoms around us," said the Committee in
1831, "and the agitations of our own country, call on us to ' work
while it is day.'" "The pangs and throes of the Old World,"
wrote Pratt in the Missionary Begister, "are fast coming on.
Dark and ominous clouds are blowing up from every quarter ;
the moral atmosphere is surcharged with mischief, and society
itself seems ready to heave from its foundations." He commends
the Epistle of St. James for general reading, and goes on, " Not
by our controversies, but by our meekness and patience — not by
many-coloured faith, but by our works, proceeding from that well-
defined faith of Scripture, ' faith that worketh by love ' — will the
cause of our Eedeemer be truly and largely promoted in this
nation and in the world."
At home, the period takes us from the middle of George the And at
Fourth's reign, over that of William, to the early days of Queen ^°"'^'
Victoria and her young husband Prince Albert ; and we seem , even
as we read these words, to step into a new atmosphere. The great
material developments of the century are commencing. Steam
navigation is already rapidly increasing; railway travelling has
begun ; even the electric telegraph is projected ; ■■'■ the penny post
has just been established (1840) ; the financial reforms of Peel and
his successors, which are to diffuse wealth to an extent utterly
undreamed of, are about to be initiated. But an epoch of national
upheaval has preceded all this. Parliamentary Eeform has been Reform
effected after a conflict far exceeding in bitterness anything that ^'"•
we in the second half of the century have witnessed. The agita-
tion, when the House of Lords threw out Earl Grey's first Bill,
was tremendous. Quiet families in the country were terrified at
night by seeing the flames of burning hay-ricks and even of farm-
houses, and in the day by the news of riots in all directions, of
Derby gaol broken open, of Nottingham Castle burnt, of fearful
excesses in the streets of Bristol. In the n)idst of it all came the
Cholera, a disease hitherto unknown in Europe, and caused uni- Cholera,
versal terror by its ravages. A Fast Day was proclaimed by
Government; and Pratt wrote in a private letter,! "I gather
hope from the seeming piety with which the Day of Humihation
* In ] 837-8 the first steamships crossed the Atlantic, the London and
Birniingliani Railway was opened, and a telegraphic message was sent from
Euston to Camden Town.
t Life of Pratt, p. 288.
272 The Environment of the Period
Paet IV. was observed ; for though there was a degree of impious scoffing
1824-41. ["in the House of Commons] such as I never remember on any
Chap. 20. gj^-^j}^^ occasion, there was, on the other hand, more apparent
piety than I ever saw. So it is, while the enemy comes in hke a
flood, the Spirit of God lifts up a standard against him."
Bickersteth w^rote a tract on the occasion, which was circulated
by hundreds of thousands.
Parliamentary Eeform did not of itself effect Social Eeform ;
but it woke up the nation to see the appalling need of it. Let
Social Lord Shaftesbury's biographer summarize for us the condition of
condition ,1 •
of the thmgs :—
people. u s^ spirit of turbulence and lawlessness manifested itself everywhere.
. . . Education was at a deplorably low ebb. . . . The factory system
was cruel in its oppression. Mines and collieries were worked in great
measure by women and children. Bakers, sailors, and chimney-sweeps,
were unprotected by legislation. Friendly societies, many of them rotten
to the core, were the only legalized means of self-help. Pawnbrokers
held the savings of the people. " Sanitary science was practically unknown.
Ragged schools, reformatory and industrial schools, mechanics' institutes,
and "workmen's clubs, had not begun to exist. Taxation was oppressive
and unjust. Postal communication was an expensive luxury even to the
well-to-do. Limited liability, enabling working-men to contribute their
small capital to the increase of the productive power of the country, was
not so much as thought of. The cheap literature of the day reflected
the violent passions which raged on every side. Crime was rampant ;
mendicancy everywhere on the increase " —
— and the writer goes on to draw a picture of London and the
large towns before Sir E. Peel established the police force." This
graphic passage describes the position in 1833. In 1837, when
Queen Victoria ascended the throne, it was worse rather than
better, a fact to be remembered when we look back over her long
and glorious reign ; and at this point it will be interesting to read
the words of Lord Chichester, at the C.M.S. Anniversary next
T,. after her accession, regarding the young Queen : —
The young / o <_> .^ w "^
Queen. u gij-^gg ^^yy^ last Anniversary, a star has risen above our political
horizon— a star of beauty and of promise ; and, from thousands of British
hearts, there are ascending daily prayers that the dawn of her reign may
be the dawn of her coimtry's glory — that, herself reflecting the beams of
the Sun of Righteousness, our Gracious Queen may gladden and refresh
our drooping land. May the blessing of God so rest upon her, that the
loyalty which she inspires may provoke us to a better chivalry than that
of arms ! May her name be associated with those works of Christian
Love, which, however disproportionate to our high responsibilities, prove
that we are still a Christian People ! And thus shall the record of her
reio-n be a record of victories unstained with blood — of victories, whose
o-lo'ry shall be ascribed to the Son of God— whose trophies shall consist,
not of captive Kings or Nations made subject to the sceptre of England's
Queen, but of ransomed slaves delivered from the bondage of Satan, and
brought, through the efl'orts of British Charity, into the happy service
of England's God." f
* Hodder, E., Li/e of Lord Shaftesbury, vol. i. pp. 131-134.
t Sydney Smith, preaching at St. PanUs on the Qncen's Accession, said.
The Environment of the Period 273
The Ministry of Eaii Grey, which took oflice in 1831 after Part IV.
twenty years of Tory government, and which carried the Eeform 1S24-41.
Bill, did not prove antagonistic to the plans and pohcy of the ^hap^20.
Evangelical leaders. It was on the right side of the Slavery The whigs
question, its Lord Chancellor, Brougham, having been for years ^^ ^
ri.1 J. ci ,'1 T , -.. •',. Church
one 01 the most powerful anti-slavery advocates ; and it was this Reform.
Government that introduced and passed the Abolition Bill, as we
shall see by-and-by. On India questions, too, it was sound, the
younger Charles Grant (afterwards Lord Glenelg) being President
of the Board of Control (as the India Office was then called).
Certainly it was not specially favourable to the Church. Earl
Grey called on the Bishops to "set their houses in order,"
though he did not finish the quotation and tell them they should
" die, and not live." Eadical reforms were introduced, to the
dismay of the majority of Churchmen ; and the opposition offered
to these and to the Eeform Bill by the Bishops in Parliament
brought upon them great odium. They were even hustled and
insulted in Palace Yard ; they were burnt in effigy ; on the 5th
of November, figures representing them were substituted for Guy
Eawkes ; the Archbishop of Canterbury was mobbed in his own
cathedral city ; the Bishop of Lichfield and Coventry (Eyder) was
nearly killed outside St. Bride's, Fleet Street ; the Bishop of
London dared not go out to preach ; and the Bishop of Bristol's
palace was attacked and burnt to the ground. When, however,
the Irish Church Temporalities Bill was brought in, which al^olished
two archiepiscopal and eight episcopal Sees, and many sinecure
cathedral stalls, and redistributed their revenues, eleven Enghsh
Bishops voted for it. They were beginning to see that although
Church Eeform might be painful, it was the only way of saving
the Church — at least the Church Establishment. Josiah Pratt
had seen this before. He wrote of the "infatuation" of those
who opposed all change. " If the real evils in the Church,"
he said, " were promptly redressed, it would stand firm in its
strength ; but while nothing is done to remove its blemishes,
the sappers are at work at the foundation." The obstructives,
however, were outvoted ; and it is impossible now to dispute the
truth of Dr. Stoughton's words, that " the reforms strengthened
the Church's corner-stones, added buttresses to its walls, and gave
it a new lease of continuance." "-''
"What limits to the glory and happiness of our land, if the Creator should in
Tlis mercy have placed in the heart of this royal woman the rudiments of
wisdom and mercy; and if, f^ivinp: them time "to expand, and to bless our
children's children with her goodness. He should grant to her a long
sojourning upon earth, and leave her to reign over us till she is well-stricken
in years. What glory! AVhat happiness ! What joy! What bounty of God ! "
((Quoted by Stoughton, Relijion in Enfilnnd, 1800—1850, vol. ii. p. 165.)
* An excellent summary of the Cliurch legislation of the period is given
by Canon CJ. G. Perry in his Studoifs EiiffUsh Church History, chap. xi.
(Murray, 1>S!»0). "In the course of twelve years," he says, " the status of
the Church of England was revolutionized."
VOL. I. T
274
The Eni'ironment of the Period
There can l^e no doubt that the Church, notwithstanding the
abuses that needed to be dealt with, was in its moral and spiritual
influence far stronger than it had been at the beginning of the
century. Dr. Overton gives many contemporary testimonies to
the fact.-'- Of course its condition would not compare for one
moment with its condition in the present day. Since then the
standard of efficiency has been enormously raised ; and the practical
good work done is a hundred-fold what it was at the date of Queen
Victoria's accession. But the improvement had begun ; and Dr.
Overton attriluites it, in the main, to the influence of the Evan-
gelical party. In the main ; but he very fairly adduces the
conscientious zeal of the small band of real High or " Orthodox "
Churchmen — the men who were infusing new life into the S.P.G.
and S.P.C.K. — such as Bishops Van Mildert and Blomfield, Arch-
deacon Daubeney, Christopher Wordsworth the elder (Master of
Trinity), H. H. Norris, and Joshua Watson the layman, though he
confesses that they did not exercise a wide influence, — except
indeed Blomfield, at a rather later period. These two sections
together were but a small minority of Churchmen. " Both
together w^ere far outnumbered by the many w^ho w^ere neither one
thing nor the other ; some inclining to the high and dry, some to
the low and slow ; some whose creed consisted mainly in a sort of
general amiabihty, and some who were mere worldlings."! This
torpid majority, indeed, were easily roused to echo the cry of " the
Church in danger"; but the Church Improvement and Church
Extension wdiich are the best Church Defence were eflected by the
iwo wings, and, in the main, by the Evangelicals. It is incidental
evidence of this, as Overton points out, that to be " serious " still
meant to be a " Low Churchman," not a " High Churchman."
People generally took for granted that spirituality and Evangeli-
calism were, in the Church of England, nearly synonymous
terms. Not that all Evangelicals were spiritual : that has never
been the case ; but that spiritual men, generally speaking, were
assumed to be Evangelicals.
In a previous chapter we saw how the earlier Evangelicals
introduced week-day services and evening services, and hymns,
and more frequent communions. Daniel Wilson, soon after going
to Islington, succeeded in arranging, says his biographer, "three
full services in the church on Sundays and great festival days,
and one in the w^eek, besides morning prayers on Wednesdays and
Fridays and saints' days. An early sacrament at eight, in addition
to the usual celebration, had been also commenced." \ In fact,
considerably later than this, at Evangelical country towns like
Lowestoft under Francis Cunningham, attendance at early Com-
munion was a special token of evangelical fervour. In 1836 Simeon
wrote of Trinity Church, Cambridge, " Yesterday I partook of the
* English Church in the Nineteenth Century, p. 8.
t Ibid., p. 15. X ^'f^ of Bishop D. Wilson, vol. i. p. 264.
The Environment of the Period 275
Lord's Supper in concert with a larger number than has been Part TV.
convened together in any church in Cambridge since the place }^^^'^}q
existed upon earth. ... So greatly," he quaintly adds, " has the '"'P'
Church of England been injured by myself and my associates." '■■•
No wonder Dr. Overton, after noticing Daniel Wilson's work at
Islington, remarks that " the Low Churchmen were better
Churchmen than the No Churchmen." And it was the same in
practical parochial work. Dr. Moule mentions that his father,
when at Gillingham, was told by Bishop Burgess of Salisbury,
about the period we are now dealing with, that, "wherever he
went in his diocese, it was generally those who thought with him
[H. Moule] who were the active men in the parishes. " It is they,"
he said, " who get schools built, and diligently teach the young,
and bring them well prepared for Confirmation." Moreover, it is
specially germane to this History to observe that it was then, as
now and as ever, the parishes in which zeal and interest in the
evangelization of the world were manifested, that were in the front
in all Church work at home.
This last point was also illustrated when the Church Pastoral f-^-^-f-
Aid Society was founded in 1836. It was actually formed in the
Committee-room of the Church Missionary Society, Pratt taking
an active part in the arrangements. Bickersteth and other C.M.S.
leaders were also in its counsels from the first ; and its second
Anniversary sermon was preached by Mr. Pearson, the Principal
of Islington College. The Missionary Begistcr regularly reported
its proceedings, as well as those of the London City Mission, and
of the Additional Curates' Society, or, as the latter was at first
named, the Clergy Aid Society, which were established about the
same time. Indeed the x\.C.S. was started by some of the Bishops
partly as a kind of protest against the Evangelical distinctiveness
of the C.P.A.S. Mr. Gladstone, also, who was at first a Vice-
President of the C.P.A.S., withdrew and joined the rival society.
This last-mentioned incident is an illustration of the increasing
activity of the more Orthodox School on the lines of organization
laid down by the Evangelical Societies. The Register of 1839
records the formation of Provincial Associations in aid of the Growth of
S.P.G., the Bishop of Nova Scotia and Archdeacon Eobinson of ^■^■^■
Madras visiting some of the counties for the purpose. One
result of this movement, viz., proposals for forming Joint Local
Associations of S.P.G. and C.M.S., will come before us hereafter.
The S.P.G. funds were now rising rapidly year by year, and it was
successfully grappling with a still more rapid rise in the expendi-
ture, accompanied by the withdrawal of the old Government
grant for the Canadian clergy. Royal letters were granted to it in
1831 and 1836, the latter being specially with a view to aid in
ministering to the freed slaves in the West Indies ; but the
healthier sources of Income grew independently of these Letters,
* Moule's Simeon, p. 257.
T 2
276
The Environment of the Period
Part IV. and by 1840 the voluntary contributions exceeded £40,000. In
1824-41. that year its Annual Sermon was preached for the first time at
Chap. 20. g|._ Paul's, and the Lord Mayor gave a dinner afterwards at the
Mansion House ; but there were no public meetings at this time,
the one in 1826, mentioned in a former chapter, and another in
1827, being quite exceptional.
-The Among other features that marked the Church of the period was
Bishops, the increasing activity and efficiency of the Bishops. Conspicuous
among those who were raising the standard of episcopal work were
the two Sumners at Winchester and Chester, Bishop Eyder at
Lichfield, Bishop Otter at Chichester, and Bishop Blomfield in
London. Bishop Blomfield was called by Sydney Smith " The
Church of England here upon earth "; and again he says, " When
the Church of England is mentioned, it only means Charles
James London." =•' It is worth while, therefore, to look a little
Bishop at this remarkable man. The difference between Blomfield at
Blomfield. Q^ggter and Blomfield in London marks in curious ways the
changes that were coming over the Church, For example, about
ten years before Queen Victoria came to the throne, a clergyman
in tile diocese of Chester opened his church to a deputation to
" preach on behalf of some society (not named, but not C.M.S.).
Bishop Blomfield wrote to him as follows :f —
"July^Qth, 1827.
"... A circular letter has been put into my hands, announcing a
sermon to be preached in your church, on behalf of a society called the
Society, by the Rev. . This open defiance of my directions,
with respect to these itinerant preachers, calls for some expression of my
displeasure. I would put the question to your common sense, whether
there must not be some check upon the preaching of sermons for
societies . . . and who is to exercise that check Imt the bishop ? . . . I
have prohibited Mr. from preaching again in my diocese."
But when the Queen came to the throne, even the S.P.G.,
which was above all suspicion of irregularities, was sending its
deputations over the country. Again, here is a passage from the
Memoir of Bishop Blomfield, in which his son and biographer
describes his views concerning ecclesiastical and religious topics,
wdiich affords a very curious glimpse into the mind of a vigorous
young Bishop of the via media school : I —
" He insisted iipon the gown being worn in the pulpit, alleging that
the use of the surplice was a departure from the usual practice, only
found in remote and small parishes ; he would not support the Church
Missionary Society, disapproving of the principles of its management ;
he considered that charity was too much diverted to distant objects to
the neglect of those nearer and more immediate ; he considered that
the revival of an operative Convocation would be inexpedient; he refused
to sanction any collection of hymns for use in churches ; he declared
that it was binding upon the clergy to preach the sole merits of Christ,
and the corruption of human nature, but discovmtenanced Cahdnistic
* Memoir of Bishop Blomfield, vol. i. p. 205.
t Ibid., vol. i. p. 119. X Ibid., vol. i. p. 110.
The ByviROXMEXT of the Period 277
opinions ; he disapproved of Wednesday evening lectures, and tlionglit Part IV.
that where there were two full services on Sundays, such week-day 1824-41.
services were not recjuired ; he would rather that the sermon should be Chap. 20.
omitted on Communion Sundaj^s, than the elements should be adminis-
tered to more than one comnuuiicant at a time ; he questioned the
propriety of holding oratorios in churches, and the profit of converting
a dinner-party into a prayer-meeting ; and he maintained that the first
duty of bishop and clergy is to act strictly and punctiliously according
to law."
But when Blom field was in the diocese of London, shortly after Biomfieid
the Queen came to the throne, we find him using all his influence surpHce.
to get the clergy generally to adopt the surplice in the pulpit ;
also to introduce the weekly offertory, and to read the Prayer for
the Church Militant at Morning Service, even when there was
no Communion. The Charge delivered in 1842, in which he made
these recommendations,''' was warmly welcomed by many Evan-
gelicals, among them by J. W. Cunningham of Harrow, who was
then one of their foremost leaders, and who was a far more
frequent speaker at C. M.S. Anniversaries than any other individual
in the whole century. But two newspapers attacked the Bishop
from opposite points of view. One was the Times, which was
then largely under the influence of the young Tractarian party,
and the other was the Record, which, although at first it approved
the suggestions, afterwards turned round and advised the clergy
of Islington and other Evangelicals to refuse compliance. It is
curious to find Blomfield's biographer writing in 1863 to the eft'ect
that the use of the surplice in the pulpit, which had been widely
adopted at the Bishop's request, was " now generally aban-
doned " ! f
But this is carrying us beyond our period. Let us return to
the 'thirties.
The great Societies had now a place of meeting better fitted to Exeter
accommodate the troops of friends that attended. A large Hall buut.
had been built on the site of old Exeter Change in the Strand, the
money being raised by the issue of £50 shares, which were taken
up by the wealthy philanthropists interested in the provision of
such a meeting-place. Some of the Societies took shares, and the
C.M.S. for many years held five, as an investment, the interest
forming a small item in the Income. It was at first proposed to
name the building the Philadelphian Hall, with the correspond-
ing motto, "Let brotherly love [^lAaSfAe^ia] continue"; but
before it was opened, the now famous name o-f Exeter Hall was
decided on, " in reference to the site having belonged to the
Exeter family." The opening took place on March 29th, 1831,
with a large gathering for prayer, when representatives of many
societies took part. In May of that year, the Hall was used for
the Anniversaries of most of the leading societies ; and it has
* Memoir of Bishop Biomfieid, vol. ii. pp. 22, 47, &c.
t Ibid., vol. ii. p. 63.
278
The Environment of the Period
Part IV.
1824-4.1.
Chap. 20.
Amend-
ments at
Exeter
Hall
meetings.
Bible
Society
contro-
versies,
On the
Apocrypha
And on
theological
tests.
The great
struggle.
been so used ever since. " Midway between the Abbey of West-
minster and the Church of the Knights Templars," writes Sir
James Stephen in his picturesque style, " twin columns, emulat-
ing those of Hercules, fling their long shadows across the strait
through which the far-resounding Strand pours the full current of
human existence into the deep recesses of Exeter Hall. Borne on
that impetuous tide, the mediterranean waters lift up their voice
in a ceaseless swell of exulting or pathetic declamation. The
changeful strain rises with the civilization of Africa, or becomes
plaintive over the wrongs of chimney-boys, or peals anathemas
against the successors of St. Peter, or in rich diapason calls on the
Protestant Churches to wake and evangehze the world ! "
It is a curious illustration of the imperfections of all things
human, that, in the first year of the occupation of what was
intended to be a temple of " brotherly love," several of the meet-
ings were interrupted by the moving of amendments ; a circum-
stance then apparently unprecedented, and which has since then
rarely if ever recurred. Both the C.M.S. and the Bible Society
underwent this experience. In the former case the amendment,
which we shall hear of in another chapter, was at once approved
and almost unanimously adopted ; but in the latter case it brought
a bitter controversy to a climax and led to a painful secession.
The Bible Society, indeed, though it had attained a position of
influence far exceeding that of any other Society, and though it
was doing a magnificent work, was not only continually assailed
by vigorous High Church pens like those of Bishop Marsh and
Archdeacon Daubeney, but also repeatedly troubled by internal
dissensions ; and these divided the C.M.S. leaders, the Secretaries
themselves being on opposite sides in the critical controversy in
1831. Before this, there had been a serious struggle over the
question of printing the Apocrypha. The Society did not include
the Apocryphal books in its English Bibles, but, being "the
British and Foreign," afiihated and subsidized the Continental
Societies which did include them in the foreign editions. This
was objected to by the Scotch branches, which, after much
disputing, ultimately seceded, notwithstanding that the Parent
Society at length gave way, and determined to make no grants
towards the publication of any editions that included the
Apocrypha. But the controversy in 1831 was much more serious.
The Society having been originally formed as a mere business
organisation for producing and circulating the Scriptures, its
membership was quite open, and it was in fact supported by
many of the old English Presbyterians who had drifted into
Unitarianism, as well as by others whose doctrinal views were very
uncertain, if indeed they had any at all to speak of. This gradually
became a great offence to the more decided Evangelicals, both
Churchmen and Dissenters; and after many preliminary skirmishes,
the battle was joined at the first Annual Meeting that was held in
Exeter Hall. An amendment was moved to the Eeport, affirming
The ExriRONMEJsiT of the Period 279
" that no person rejecting the doctrine of a Triune Jehovah can Part IV.
be considered a member of a Christian Institution," and requiring ^P"*"^!:
the Laws to be altered accordingly. Immense uproar ensued, '^■_ "
and, says Dr. Stoughton, " it was sad to witness the passionate
expressions of feeling which w^ere exhibited." "'■' The chairman,
Lord Bexley, could not make himself heard, and Daniel Wilson
stepped forward to speak in his name, as a strong opponent of
the px'oposed test. The venerable and eccentric pastor of Surrey
Chapel, Eowland Hill, declared that it was "preposterous to
refuse to let Socinians distribute the only antidote to their owai
errors," and that he would be glad if even a Mohammedan were
willing to do so. " Nay, he would accept a Bible from the devil
himself, only he would take it with a pair of tongs." The
graver defenders of the existing open constitution argued that if
the Society's Laws w'ere to eml)ody restrictive theological defini-
tions, it would be needful to go further, and insert other words
to exclude Romanists, &c. ; and they pleaded that, as a matter of
fact, all the members of the governing body, and the agents, w'ere
orthodox evangelical Christians. The amendment was rejected
by a great majority; and a portion of the minority thereupon
seceded, and formed the Trinitarian Bible Society, which exists to
this day.
In this controversy, Josiah Pratt, in common with the majoi'ity Attitude
of C. M.S. leaders, supported the original constitution. Bickersteth men.
was on the other side, and had to encounter a vehement protest
by Dandeson Coates in consequence; but he declined to deseit
the Bible Society, recognizing the blessedness of its work, and that
the objection w^as after all rather a theoretical than a practical one.
He, however, subscribed also to the Trinitarian Society as a token
of sympathy with the conscientious scruples of its promoters.!
Many other good men adopted his line ; and at the Anniversary
in the following year, the brothers Noel, Gerard and Baptist, who
had been in the opposition, made a generous amende, and avowed
their unfaltering allegiance to the old Bible Society. Pratt, with
his never-failing impartiality, reported the proceedings of the
new Trinitarian organization year by year in the liegistcr, and it
can therefore be seen that the speakers at its meetings com-
prised scarcely any C.M.S. leaders. Dissensions, moreover, arose
in its councils from the first ; but none the less it did good work
in spending upon the work of Bible circulation the money of
those who would not support the old Society.
There was another controversy mixed up with tliis one. In Prayer at
earlier days, none of the religious Societies opened their public i^eetings.
* ReUgion in England, 1800 to 1850, vol. ii. p. 90. The Record of the
period gives a verhatiui report of the proceediuf^s, which lasted six hours, and
were of the most painful character. One can scarcely read the report -without
sympathizint^ with the supijortors of the anicndnient ; and the Record evidently
did so.
I Memoir of E. Bickcrstetli, vol. ii. pp. 30-35.
2 So The Environment of the Period
Part IV. meetings with prayer. This, which seems to us ahnost incredible,
1824-41. -yvas ^Q doubt due to two circumstances. First, the old Conventicle
^^^' ' Acts forbad anything of the nature of a religious service except
in churches and licensed dissenting chapels ; insomuch that even
at Simeon's conversational parties for undergraduates, held in his
own rooms at King's College, he had no prayer, for fear of
transgressing the law.'-^' It is true that a new Act regarding
Dissenters in 1812 had repealed the old ones ; but its effect was
uncertain. Secondly, public meetings were held in the large
rooms of hotels and taverns : and there w'as a feeling of " incon-
gruity of acts of religious worship wnth places usually occupied
for very different purposes." f Gradually, however, the need and
importance of public prayer was more and more felt ; and
apparently the Jews' Society led the way in introducing an
opening prayer at Freemasons' Hall. Immediately after the
C.M.S. Anniversary in 1828, the Committee passed a resolution
that " as the S.P.G. and the Jews' Society opened their meetings
with prayer," it was desirable for the Church Missionary Society
to do the same for the future. This History has shown several
occasions on which C.M.S. helped S.P.G. ; but this good example
set by S.P.G. may well be held to balance the account. It is true
that the S.P.G. annual meetings were wont to be held in the
vestry of Bow Church, w4iich was sacred ground ; but it can
hardly be doubted, in the face of the C.M.S. Committee's
resolution, that the two special meetings held by the venerable
Society in Freemason's Hall in the two years immediately
preceding (1826 and 1827) were also opened with prayer ; and
this would certainly protect the C.M.S. from any accusation of
ecclesiastical irregularity if it proceeded to do the same in the
same hall.]:
But when Exeter Hall, a building free from tavern associations,
was opened in 1831, there was no longer any room for scruple on
the score of incongruity ; and from that time the practice became
general. But the Bible Society was still an exception. Why
was this ? Not only because a Socinian would object to the
ordinary Christian conclusion of a prayer, "through Jesus Christ
our Lord," but because Dissenters objected to a form of prayer,
while Churchmen dreaded what wdld sentiments might be expressed
in extempore prayer, and Quakers, then very influential (it was
the period of Joseph John Gurney and Mrs. Fry), objected to
any arrangement beforehand as to who should lead in prayer.
Bickerstetla and others, however, deeply felt that these difficulties
* Moule's Simeon, p. 229.
t Pratt, in Missionary Register, 1828, p. 221.
X The Liverpool CM. Associatiou followed the example of the Parent
Society, and appointed a clergyman to draw up a prayer for use, taken from
the Liturgy. A proposal was also made " to conclude with a psalm or
hymn"; "but," say the Minutes of the Liverpool Committee, "further
consideration of this important innovation to our proceedings was
postponed."
The Environment of the Period 281
were the sort of difficulties that ought to be surmounted ; and TARTiy-
many who, hke Pratt, had opposed any imposition of doctrmal ^ ^^
tests, concurred in the importance of sanctifying Bible Society
meetings by the reading of Scripture and prayer. But Mr.
Brandram, the able clerical secretary, supported the Dissenters in
opposing any such innovation ; and no change was effected till
1849, when the reading of " a devotional portion of Scripture "
was at last permitted. Prayer was not introduced until 1857.
Questions like these, however, were but the practical outcome 0^^^'^'^°"^
of a general spirit of disunion which, from about 1827 onwards, Evan-
spread in Evangelical ranks.- For instance, on the great suliject gei'cais.
of Catholic Emancipation, which was the chief topic of political
home controversy before the Eeform agitation, leading Evangelical
Churchmen were divided. Wilberforce, Buxton, the Grants,
younc^ Lord Ashlev, Dealtry, Daniel Wilson, favoured the
recognition of Eoman Cathohc claims; but they were a minority. |-^hohc^^_
Pratt and Bickersteth earnestly and actively opposed the Bill. tion.
The consequence was that the Eccord, then lately started,
expressed, strange to say, no strong opinion on the matter. A
similar division of opinion prevailed throughout the Church.
Most of the High Church and Orthodox Bishops and divines were
against the Bill, but not all. Keble led a strenuous opposition
at Oxford; and Sir Eobert H. Inglis, a strong Churchman,
yet associated with the Clapham circle and a warm supporter
of the Church Missionary Society, obtained the coveted seat for
the University, after a prolonged and strenuous struggle, turning
out Peel, who, with the Duke of Wellington, had brought in the
dreaded Bill in the teeth of all their previous declarations. _ It
passed, however (1829) ; and thus one of the causes of disunion
was put out of the way. There were similar ditferences, but
less acute, over the Bill for repealing the Test and Corporation
Acts, which was practically for the relief of Dissenters ; but
this also passed, in the preceding year, 1828.
But internal and esoteric controversies wuthin Evangehcal
ranks affected the Church Missionary Society more directly. The Jaivmistic
old Calvinistic disputes had not died out. There was a small and
diminishing party of very extreme predestinarian views, whose
members constantly charged moderate Calvinists like Scott,
Simeon, Pratt, and Bickersteth, with being "enemies to the free,
sovereign, and everlasting grace of God"; yet these moderate
leaders were the very men who all the while were defending the
doctrines of grace against the vehement attacks of Bishops Mant
and Marsh and Archdeacon Daubeney, as well as against the
Arminianism of the Wesleyans. Bickersteth, in his journeys for
the Church Missionary Society, found what was called "high
* There was indeed some disunion before. Ten years earlier had occurred
what was called the Western Schism, when some friends at Bristol, Bath, &c.,
went astray on the subject, inter alia, of Infant Baptism, and seceded from
the Church.
missiona
sermon
282 The Environment of the Period
Part IV. Calvinism " — reaching almost to Antinomianism — a great obstacle.
1824-41. Men who would not sav to their own congregations at home,
^' ■ " Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ," because no one could believe
except by the compulsory power of the Holy Spirit, and who
openly repudiated the word " responsibility " as applicable to the
elect people of God, were, quite naturally, incapable of missionary
zeal for the evangelization of the Heathen ; and Bickersteth writes
of his attempt to introduce the Society at Plymouth,''' where
Dr. Hawker's influence was dominant, as his " most formidable
affair." " Such," he wrote, " is the effect of his doctrines, that I
fear nothing can be done in that large town for extending Christ's
Kingdom."
Edward Then again, Edward Irving was at the zenith of his great
rving. reputation in 1825-33. No such preacher had ever taken London
by storm. Crowds from the highest classes of society mobbed
the modest Scotch churches in Hatton Garden and Regent Square.
Even at 7 a.m. the latter building was crowded. " By many
degrees the greatest orator of our times," said De Quincey. " The
freest, bravest, brotherliest human soul mine ever came in contact
His great with," Said Carlyle. Irving's famous sermon before the London
"^ Missionary Society in 1825 startled all missionary circles. He
denounced the Societies for their prudential care about money
matters, and called upon Christians to go forth into all the world
as the apostles went round the familiar villages of their own little
Galilee, without scrip or purse, shoes or staves. " He seemed,"
says Dr. Stoughton, " going back to the days of Francis of Assisi,
interpreting Scripture as the Italian saint would have done, and
seeking to wrap a friar's mantle round a Protestant preacher." f
Although the Directors of the L.M.S. were inclined to think their
preacher mad, a good many, both within and without the Church,
regarded him as a new prophet arisen in the name of the Lord.;]:
Then Irving strayed into strange heresies regarding the nature of
Christ's humanity, and set forth novel views of prophecy, and
subsequently developed "supernatural manifestations" in the
shape of miraculous tongues and cures. Then he was excom-
municated by the Church of Scotland, and founded the " Catholic
Apostolic Church," now known as Irvingites ; and, in Stoughton's
words, "the 'religious public,' after making him an idol, pulled
him from his pedestal and east him down into the dust." With
much of this our History is not concerned ; but Irving's influence
undoubtedly fostered the disunion among Evangelical Christians
which is one of the features of the environment of the period.
* But at Devonport (Plymouth Dock it was then called), Mr. Hitchins,
Henry Martyn's cousin, had a C.M.S. Association.
t Reliipon in England, 1800-1850, vol. i. p. 379.
X In 1889, a series of articles appeared in Tlie CJiristian, which turned out
to be in the main a reproduction of Irving's sermon. They had a similar
effect on many minds, for a time. It is worth noting that the writer, like
Irving, soon afterwards went quite off Evangelical and Scriptural lines.
The Environment of the Period 283
Nearly at the same time, arose ^vhat is known as Plymouth rAHT_TY.
Brethrenism, which in the 'thirties and 'forties rapidly became a ^j^; 20.
power, and drew away not a few of the most spiritually-mmded
members of the Church, particularly in Ireland. It began with Piyrnouth
that longing after a perfect Church which has always been so
attractive a conception among simple-mmded Christians witn
little knowledge of Church History. Its influence grew m
consequence of its thorough devotion to the study, verse by verse
and line by hne, of the Word of God ; not merely the critical
study of Hebrew verbs and Greek prepositions— though this was
not omitted by the more scholarly of the Brethren,— but the study
of the inmost meaning of the narratives and precepts and prophecies
as a revelation from God to men. And, in particular, it developed
well-marked "Futurist" views of unfulfilled prophecy, which
have since been widely adopted, and have led at different times to
much controversy. In later years, the influence of the Brethren
has dechned, owing to their endless divisions ; but m the period
we are now studying, they had the advantage which belongs; to
every new movement, and indirectly they caused much doubting
and questioning in Evangelical circles. The Church Missionary
Society had cause in those days to lament their influence, tor
it lost through them three missionaries, viz., John Kitto, the
printer at Malta, who joined Mr. Anthony Groves (though he
did not belong to them in after years); Ehenius, the great
Tinnevelly missionary, whose breach with the Church was also
due to Mr. Groves's influence ; and Mrs. Wilson, of Calcutta and
^Thr'study of prophecy was not confined to the Brethren and f-Pjf.ts
those who came under their influence. Sober and godly divines and^.^^^
within the Church were taking up the subject ; and several ot
those best-known among C.M.S. leaders adopted what are known
as Pre-Millenarian views. We here touch a question which has
a very close connexion with Foreign Missions. The popular
idea, prior to this period, had been that the gradual and complete
conversion of the world would be effected by their agency, ihe
earlier Annual C.M.S. Sermons generally take this for gmnted
and draw glowing pictures of the wonderful results to be looked
for ere long from missionary effort. Perhaps it was the hard
experience gained in Sahsbury Square, of the slow progress of
God's work, and of the wav in which it is marred by human
infirmity, that led, together with a closer study of the iSew
* See pp. 317, 320. Mr. Groves was a remarkable nian, and truly devoted. He
■went to Baghdad as a volunteer "free-lance" missionary at his o-nm charfjcs
in 1830, and was there joined by Mr. ParncU (afterwards Lord Congleton)
andF W Newman (brother of J. H. Newman, and afterwards a Deist) : and
also by Pfander, afterwards tlie great C.M.S. missionary to Moliammedans.
While they were at Baghdad, a terrible outbreak of the plague occurred,
which carried off moie than half the population ; and Mrs. Groves was one
of the victims. Mr. Groves afterwards went to India.
284
The Environment of the Period
Part IV.
CLap. 20.
E. Bicker-
steth's
changed
views.
Elliott's
" Horse."
Testament, to Edward Bickersteth's avowed change of views.
He, and many others hke-minded, came to beheve that our Lord
will return to an unconverted world, though it might be, if He
tarried long, to a Christianized world in the sense in which Europe
is already Christian; that therefore the "millennium" — wdiatever
the mysterious "thousand years " of Eev. xx. might really mean
— could not precede His coming, but must follow it ; and
that after His return there w^ould be further great events upon
the earth, though upon the nature of these it would not be right
to dogmatize. The effect of such views upon Missions was not to
paralyze but to stimulate prayer and effort. If the Lord might
really come at any time, so much the more reason for the utmost
energy and self-denial to ' ' prepare and make ready His way ' ' ;
and Bickersteth, in a letter written (1836) to a clergyman who
had asked him for advice as to the best way of awakening
missionary interest, urged him to study the Lord's gracious
purpose to gather for Himself an elect Church out of the Gentiles
before His Coming, which would be the " grand animating spring "
of zeal and liberality.''' Francis Goode, in the Annual Sermon of
1838, strikingly sets forth the same motive for missionary effort.
These views, however, did not win universal assent, even among
the inner circles of Evangelical students ; and at a later period
(1853), Samuel Waldegrave, afterwards Bishop of Carlisle, de-
livered a course of Bampton Lectures against "Millenarianism."
Meanwhile, E. B. Elliott of Brighton, shortly after the close of our
period (1844), produced his great work, HorcB Apocalyptica, which
took the religious world by storm, and by its learned and powerful
marshalling of the evidence for the Historical interpretation of the
Books of Daniel and Eevelation, completely thrust out, for the
time, the Futurist views of the Plymouthists. This book —
" a work," writes Sir James Stephen,! " of profound learning,
singular ingenuity, and almost bewdtching interest," — although
comprising four large volumes, ran in a few years through several
editions.
But the study of pi^ophecy was not always conducted soberly
and reverently, or with due modesty and reserve ; and even
Bickersteth found "the prophetical spirit" almost as unfavourable
to Missions as the ultra-Calvinistic spirit. " Things are most
dead and cold here" [the Midland Counties], he wrote in 1831 ;
" the good men are all afloat on prophesying, and the immediate
work of the Lord is disregarded for the uncertain future. "J And
Pratt wrote in 1841, the last year of his editorship of the Begistcr,
" Plain commands and plain promises are, if not almost superseded,
yet certainly weakened in their force and energy, by views, sound
or unsound, on unfulfilled prophecy. . . . The cause of Missions is
safe while, it rests on plain and unquestionable commands binding
* Memoir, vol. ii. p. 93.
f Essays in Ecclesiastical Biography, p. 583.
J Memoir, vol. ii. p. 43.
The Environmext of the Period 285
on all Christians, and on promises open to all who endeavour to Part IV.
fulfil these conunands ; but questions of this nature, rising within p?^"^~t,l:
Christian Communities, will weaken, so far as they are listened to, ^^^'
the springs and motives of action."
This brief sketch will serve to show how many topics there
were upon which the Evangelicals of the period held divergent
views, and how imminent was the danger of serious disunion, a
danger that was not wholly avoided. The Church Missionary
Society seemed to be the one rallying-point where all could unite
— as it has been on other occasions since then. A C.M.S. leader,
therefore, was the natural counsellor at such a time ; and Pratt warmings,
again and again in the Hegister warned his readers against
the danger. He began in 1827 with strong and significant words.
After referring to his reminders in previous years (as we have
before seen) of the antagonism of the devil when his kingdom
was being so vigorously assailed, he goes on, " But it is the
Internal Enemy which is chiefly to be dreaded. Christians are
not at peace among themselves." He denounces the unchari-
table spirit which "highly colours" and "grossly exaggerates"
the w^eaknesses or the mistakes of Committees and secretaries ;
the spirit of suspicion that looks at reports and statements
" rather with the view of detecting some concealed delinquency,
or of finding ground of objection, than with the design of
rejoicing with the Society in any good which it may have been
the means of effecting, and of sympatliizing with it in its
trials." "Every man," he continues, "will be tempted to set
himself up for a critic and a judge : if measures are proposed
which do not exactly accoi'd, as he apprehends them, with his
own notions, he may scatter, as some have done, crude and
erroneous circulars and pamphlets about the country ; while
others, without asking explanations, will take it for granted that
these things are true, and act on them as though they were so."
"While Charity will not hide her eyes from what is evil, she
suffereth long and is kind — beareth all things, believeth all things,
hopeth all things, endureth all things — and never faileth ! " Are
Pratt's warnings quite out of date?
A time, however, was now approaching when minor diiferences
had to be sunk in the presence of what, at the time, all
Evangelicals, and a good many who would have refused the
name, regarded as the common foe. Within the period we have
been reviewing began the Tractarian movement.
The history of what is perhaps better termed the Oxford Jjie Oxford
TV r J. • r c J 1 T 1 ■ • • T Movement.
Movement is 01 course one or the most deeply mterestmg episodes
of the century. An influence which displaced what had promised
to be a dominant influence at Oxford and perhaps in the Church —
that of Liberal Churchmen like Whately and Arnold (different as
the two men were), — which carried captive some of the most
brilliant minds in the University, — which survived the tremendous
shock of the secession to Eome of its foremost leader and of others
286 The Environment of the Period
Part IY. scarcely less distinguished, — which has developed, despite in-
1H24-41. numerable obstacles, into one of the most potent influences in the
Chap. 20. Anglican Clmrch to-day, — is one worthy of the closest and most
patient study. In the present History, of course, such a study
would be quite out of place. But throughout our narrative, from
this time forward, we shall be continually meeting the men, the
measures, the tendencies, the effects of the Oxford Movement ;
and at this point it is necessary to inquire how the C.M.S. leaders
viewed it in its early stages.
"What is called the Oxford or Tractarian movement," says
Dean Church in the opening Hnes of his brilliant and, one may
Its occa- say, pathetic work," " began, without doubt, in a vigorous effort
sion. {q][: ^^i-^g immediate defence of the Church against serious dangers,
arising from the violent and threatening temper of the days of the
Eeform Bill. It was one of several and widely differing efforts.
Viewed superficially it had its origin in the accident of an urgent
necessity. The Church was really at the moment imperilled amid
the crude revolutionary projects of the Eeform epoch ; and
something bolder and more effective than the ordinary apologies
for the Church was the call of the hour." This view is confirmed
by the familiar fact that John Henry Newman always dated the
movement from Keble's famous sermon on " National Apostasy "
on July 1-ith, 1833, which, as the title indicates, was inspired by
the political perils of the time. But the attacks on the Church a .
an Establishment were only the occasion, not the cause, of the
Its causes, movement. The cause lay far deeper. Eomanticism was rising up
against utilitarianism ; Sir Walter Scott's works had awakened in
thousands of minds a sympathetic interest in what was mediaeval
and antiquarian ; Coleridge and the Lake Poets were exercising
an influence on thoughtful minds which, so far as it affected
religion, prepared them for the new teaching that was coming;
and Keble's Christian Year, in addition to its poetic merits, had
revealed the possibility of a quiet and reverent devoutness which,
without attending a Clapham breakfast or an Exeter Hall meeting,
or subscril)ing to the Bible Society, could realize that
" There is a book, who runs may read.
Which heavenly truth imparts ;
And all the lore its scholars need
Pure eyes and Christian hearts.
" The works of God above, below,
Within us and around,
Are pages in that book to show
How God Himself is found."
From which conviction the prayer would naturally arise —
" Thou Who hast given me eyes to see
And love this sight so fair,
Give me a heart to find out Thee,
And read Thee everywhere."
* The Oxford Movement ; Macmillan, 1891. It was published after his death.
The Environment of the Period 287
Then it must be admitted that EvangehcaHsm had by this Part IV.
time Ijecome — shall we say ? — too comfortable to attract the ardent 1824-41.
and romantic minds of brilliant Oxford men bursting with new ^'^^P- ^Q-
and half-formed ideas about the grandeur of an ancient historic Evan-
Church, the beauty of submission to Authority, and the con- geiicaiism
temptible character of anything that could be branded as Oxford
"popular religionism." Dean Church is of course scarcely an '"^"'
impartial judge of Evangelicalism — though no man was ever more
impartial in intent, — but there is truth and force in his remark '■'
that " the austere spirit of Newton and Scott had, between 1820
and 1830, given way a good deal to the influence of increasing
popularity"; that "the profession of Evangelical religion had
been made more than respectable by the adhesion of men of
position and weight"; that, " preached in the pulpits of fashion-
able chapels, this religion proved to be no more exacting than
its 'High and Dry' rival"; that, "claiming to be exclusively
spiritual, fervent, unworldly, the sole announcer of the free
grace of God amid self -righteousness and sin, it had come,
in fact, to be on very easy terms with the world." In other
words, it was no longer a kind of martyrdom to be counted an
Evangelical ; and the young Oriel men had undoubtedly in them
something of the martyr-spirit. To l)e persecuted for what they
regarded as the One Catholic Apostolic Church was an honour to
be coveted. Their ideal of life was really high. They thought
the "ordinary religious morality," as the same writer expresses it,
loose and unreal — as indeed it might well seem to those who knew
not personally the bright and holy life of a Bickersteth or a
William Marsh ; and the movement really sprang, not from a
political or theological cry, but from a deep moral conviction and
purpose. The old English Church with its Apostolical Succession
was in danger : let them live for the Church, or die in its defence !
Probably it was the fact that the movement seemed to be
a Church Defence movement that prevented the Evangelical
leaders from noticing it at first ; besides which there were at
Oxford almost no Evangelicals to observe it. Two town churches
were in their hands ; but while Natt, at St. Giles's, was an
excellent man, Bulteel, at St. Ebbe's, was an antinomian, and
ultimately left the Church. In the University, St. Edmund Hall
was the " Low Church " preserve, but it was a good deal looked
down upon. Wadham, under Dr. Symons, was considered fairly
safe by Evangelical parents, and for this reason John Henry John
Newman was sent there. His Oriel Fellowship was later. He M!"Za^
had been brought up upon the writmgs of Eomaine, Newton,
Milner, and Scott. He and his brother F. W. Newman were
subscribers to the Oxford Church Missionary Association, and
for one year, 1830, he was Secretary of it ; f and he actually
* llie Oxford Movement, p. 12.
t Of Newman's attempt, mentioned by Venn, to get men to come up
288 The Environment of the Period
Part IV. contributed both money and articles to the Bccord. But Keble in-
1824-41. fluenced Hurrell Fronde, and Hurrell Fronde influenced Newman.
. la^ . <ijjg made me look," says Newman himself, "with admiration
towards the Church of Eome, and in the same degree to dislike
the Eeformation. He fixed deep in me the idea of devotion to
the blessed Virgin, and he led me gradually to believe in the Real
Presence." '•' These influences brought him whei^e at first he
did not mean to go. "I do not ask," he afterwards said in
his pathetic " Lead, kindly light," —
" to see
The distant scene ; one step enough for me " —
a mistaken prayer as regards saving truth, though a good one
for providential guidance.
But very soon the Evangelical leaders plainly saw " the
distant scene." Indeed Pratt, who, as we have seen, was no
suspicious and narrow-minded partizan, perceived the doubtful
tendency of Keble's poetry, beautiful as it was, from the
The first. The Tracts for the Times, which gave the Oxford move-
Tracts, nient its more familiar name, began to appear in 1833 ; but
it was not till 1836 that there was anything in them to excite
much alarm. Then the Evangelicals saw whither the new school
was drifting ; and the Bemains of Hurrell Froude, pul:)lished
a year or tw^o later, revealed something of its inner history.
Gradually the full sacerdotal and sacramental system of Trac-
tarianism stood revealed, and proved to be, in its essence, what
not Evangelicals only, but all moderate Anglican Churchmen,
had always understood as " popery " — to use the old word which
in those days was habitually used by all alike. The truths which
the great Revival of the preceding century had restored to the
Church — the supremacy of Holy Scripture, the sinner's direct
access to God by faith, salvation by grace alone, true regeneration
the work only of the Holy Ghost — were discredited ; and for them
was virtually substituted a religion which made salvation to
consist, practically, in membership in a Church possessing the
apostolical succession, and served by a priestly caste that alone
could administer effectual sacraments.
In the present day we can look back over sixty years and
Influence acknowledge to the full the good which the Oxford Movement has
of the effected in the Church of England. To attribute to its influence
ovemen . ^^^ ^^^^ improvement in public worship and parochial work which
the Evangelicals had already more than begun, and have since done
much to develop, is unjust and absurd ; but that it has carried
that improvement further is indisputable, and our dislike for the
extreme forms of modern Ritualism, as indicative of unscriptural
and outvote the Executive I have found no trace in the old records. (See
H. Venn's Address at Opening of new CM. House, printed in CM. Intelligencer,
April, 1862, and as Appendix B in his Memoir, p. 405.)
* Apologia, p. 87.
The Environment of the Period 289
Deaohing, ought not to ])lind us to the fact. Moreover, the Part IV.
faithful Anglican Christian to whom the old doctrines of grace 1824-^1.
are dearer than life itself has learned from it to value his ^'^«T^20.
great inheritance in an ancient historic Church, and to rejoice
in being hnked, not only with the Fathers of the blessed Eefor-
mation, but also with the Fathers of Primitive Christendom.
The continuity of Evangelical religion from that of the early
Fathers was shown, it is true, by the Evangelical historian of the
Church of Christ, Joseph Milner, from whose great work Newman
himself confessed that he derived his enthusiasm for the Fathers ;
but still it cannot be said that the continuity of the organic
Visible Church was realized to any extent till it was taught by
the men of Oxford. This continuity the Evangelical Churchman
has learned to value, while not for a moment will he " unchurch "
those members of other Protestant communions that have not
the same advantages as himself. He finds now that he can
join in much that is modern in Church life and organization,
and that is unquestionably the indirect issue of the Oxford
movement, without in the smallest degree compromising or
marring his plain Gospel beliefs and teachings. But this
development of healthy and helpful Church life has come
gradually ; and considering the grave errors with which it was
at first too closely connected, we are not surprised that our
Evangelical fathers dreaded every new advance and suspected
every successive step.
But the Church Missionary Society w\as very slow to enter into ^ ttitude
even legitimate controversy. It is stastling to read Eeport after °'^-'^-^-
Eeport, and Sermon after Sermon, at this period, and find no
allusion to the new teachings that were causing so much alarm.
Pratt denounced them in letters to Bishop Daniel Wilson ;
Bishop Wilson out in Calcutta delivered a powerful charge against
them ; Bickersteth protested against S.P.C.K. tracts that seemed
to have caught the infection, and which were in fact written by
Dodsworth, one of the Oxford party, who afterwards seceded to
Eome; the Christicui Observer, in able articles, exposed the
fallacies underlying Newman's arguments. But the C.M.S., as
a society, held its peace. And it is remarkable to find in the
Sermon of 1841, by Francis Close, the first public avowal of its
being an " Evangelical Institution." And yet in this very Sermon
there is the strongest affirmation of the Society's Church character,
much more space being given to this than to its Evangelical
character. The explanation is very simple. The C.M.S. leaders
regarded the Oxford party as "schismatics" (so Pratt calls
them), and the Evangelicals as the truest and fullest representa-
tiv'es of the old Anglican and Eeformed Church.
VOL. I.
CHAPTER XXI.
Part IV.
1824^1.
Chap. 21.
Death of
Bishop
Heber.
India .- Changes, Beforms, Developments.
The Bishops — Daniel Wilson— Lord W. Bentinck — Social Reforms —
Abolition of Suttee— Government Patronage of Idolatry — Charles
Grant the Younger and the Company — Resignation of Sir P.
Maitland — Work and Influence of R. M. Bird — Steam Communi-
cation— New Bishoprics — Bishop Corrie — Bishop Wilson and the
Caste Question — Education — Alexander Duff; his Father and
C. Simeon — Duff's Plan— Ram Mohun Roy — Duff's College— The
Early Converts — Duff and Macaulay — The "Friend of India" and
"Calcutta Review" — Duff at home — His C.M.S. Speech.
"Prepare ye the way of the Lord. . . . Every raUey sliaJl he exalted, and
every mountain and hill aliall he made low : and the crooked shall he made
straight, and the rough places plain." — Isa. xl. 3, 4.
ISHOP HEBER— gentle Reginald Heber— was found
dead in his bath at Trichinopoly on April 2nd, 1826.
It was a young C.M.S. missionary, J. W. Doran,
who, with the chaplain, lifted the lifeless body out of
the water. During his brief Indian career of two
years and a half, Heber had won all hearts by his unfailing
courtesy, goodness, and earnestness ; and his episcopate had for
the first time put Church of England Missions in his vast diocese
on a right footing. The sorrow in India was unmistakable.
Public meetings in honour of his memory were held in the three
Presidency cities, and the testimonies of high officials to his worth
are very touching. '-■= Sir Charles Grey, the Chief Justice of
Bengal, felicitously applied Heber's own picturesque lines — in his
Oxford prize poem, Palestine — to the progress which Christianity
might have been expected to make in India under Heber's sway: —
No hammer fell, no ponderous axes rung,
Like some tall palm the mystic fabric sprung, "j"
The news reached England in September, and caused universal
grief. The C.M.S. Committee, at a special meeting, expressed in
the strongest terms their sense of the loss sustained by the Church,
and their " gratitude to the Giver of all good for the strong faith,
ardent zeal, unaffected humility, universal love, and incessant
labours of this distinguished Prelate." At the same time they
* Printed in the Mis^^ionary Perjistcr of December, 1826.
f Variations in these lines si])pear in Heber's works. They are here quoted
direct from the contemporary report of Sir C. Grey's speech, and are
probably the original form.
BISHOP HEBER.
DR. ALEXANDER DUFF.
BISHOP DANIEL WILSON.
BISHOP COTTON.
REV. J. J. WEITBRECHT.
REV. B. BAILEY.
ResriniiUl Heljer, Second Bishop of Calcutta, 1S23-1926.
Alexiiuder Duff, D.D., Founder of Educationul Missions in India.
Diuiiel Wilson, Bishop of Calcutta, ls32-ls.iS.
(i. E. L. Cotton, Bishop of Calcutta, Is.JS-lSCifi.
J. J. Weitbrecht, Missionary in Bengal, 18:j0-1852.
Benjamin Bailey, Missionary in Travancore, lSlG-1850.
India: Changes, Reforms, Developments 291
adopted a memorial to the Government, urging the estabhshment PartIV.
of more Bishoprics in India, seeing that no one man could sustain ^^^^^
the responsibilities and labours of such a diocese. The S.P.G. J_
and S.P.C.K. did the same. But seven years more were to elapse
before any step was taken to supply this urgent need, and nine
years l)efore it was actually supplied.
And meanwhile, two more episcopal lives were sacrificed. The bj^»;°p|^^
next Bishop, Dr. James, only lived in India eight months ; and Turner,
the fourth Bishop, Dr. J. M. Turner, only eighteen months. The
latter was deeply mourned. He had thrown himself with ardour
into missionary labours, in cordial sympathy with both S.P.G.
and C.M.S. Corrie wrote that he was " by far the best suited for
the appointment of any who had occupied it," and again, when
Turner lay on his dying bed, " To the Indian Church the loss will
be greater than any yet suffered." The C.M.S. Committee in
their minute on hearing the news, spoke of his " combination of
literary attainments with great devotedness to the service of his
Heavenly Master," of his " judicious counsels," of his " paternal
and social intercourse with the missionaries," and of his " bright
example of fidelity, zeal, and unwearied labour."
The death of the fourth Bishop created the utmost consternation ^9^^^^^
in England. The Societies, C.M.S. included, again memorialized dead:
the Government to establish more bishoprics ; but the Eeform ^^"^^o^ ^^
agitation absorbed attention, and nothing was done. Meanwhile next?
the vacancy must be filled up ; and who would go ? In the
present day the question would naturally be asked, Are there no
suital)le men in India itself, already inured to the chmate ? But
an afiirmative answer to this question in 1831 would have been of
little practical use. There were excellent chaplains, well^ fitted
to be bishops. Thomason was dead ; but there were Carr of
Bombay, Robinson of Madras, and, above all, Corrie of Calcutta,
who as Archdeacon, had three times found himself the acting
head of the English Church in India, in the intervals between
the successive episcopates. But to appoint one of these meant
(1) a letter to India, (2) the voyage of the one chosen to England
for consecration, (3) his voyage out again; and thus some
eighteen months would be spent before India could have another
bishop, or two years since Turner's death. Someone must
be sent out ready consecrated from England; but again, who
would go ?
Bishop Turner, before saihng for India in 1829, had attended
the first annual meeting of the Islington Church Missionary
r».ssociation, which Daniel Wilson had founded in the previous
year.='= The Vicar, in the chair, promised the Bishop that " if at ^^^^^^,^
any time Islington could give or do anything to benefit India, prom?re^
thev were ready." The Bishop said " he would undoubtedly call
for the redemption of the pledge at some future time." It was
* Sec p. 256.
u 2
292
India: Chances, J^efokjijs, Developments
Part IV.
1824-41.
Chap. 21.
Daniel
Wilson,
Bishop.
His
character.
his death that sounded the summons ; it was the Vicar that
responded.
The President of the Board of Control in the new Eeform
Ministry was, as before mentioned, Charles Grant the younger ;
and to him fell the duty of finding the new bishop. Naturally he
looked to the Evangelical leaders ; lint one after another they
declined. Dr. Dealtry, Chancellor Eaikes, and Archdeacon C. J.
Hoare, were all asked in vain. Daniel Wilson then wrote to
Grant, mentioning other suitable names ; but having sent off the
letter, he suddenly felt, in his own words, " compelled by con-
science, and by an indescribable desire, to sacrifice himself, if
God should accept the offering, and the emergency arise." And
so it came to pass that on April 29th, 1832, Daniel Wilson, at the
age of fifty-four, was consecrated fifth Bishop of Calcutta. On
that day began an episcopate which, in the good providence of
God, w^as destined to last many years longer than the four previous
episcopates combined, with the intervals between them.
The Journals of Bishop Heber will always remain incomparable
as a picturesque description of India externally at the period of
his residence there. But the Life of Bishop Wilson '■- gives a much
more vivid account of the incessant occupations of an Indian
Bishop, of his ecclesiastical difficulties, and of the great influence
for good which he may be privileged to exercise. Daniel Wilson's
character was by no means a perfect one. He was naturally
both impetuous and imperious. He was a man of decided views
on most subjects, and was not afraid to avow them. Hence we
are not surprised to find his biographer, who was also his chaplain
and son-in-law, Canon Josiah Bateman, telling us that he was " a
man much spoken against," and went through " evil report and
good report." Eumours used to reach England of his being
personally dictatorial, and too stiff as a Churchman ; and old
friends like J. W. Cunningham and Dean Pearson of Salisbury
would write out affectionate warnings and exhortations. But no
one w^as more conscious of his failings, such as they were, than
the Bishop himself. His replies to the friendly letters, printed in
his Biography, are beautifully humble and grateful ; and his
journals are full of self-condemnation and of earnest prayers for
the sanctifying grace of God. In fact, his faults were the faults
of a strong character. He proved a great bishop ; and he did a
noble work. " His strong devotional spirit," says Sir John Kaye,
" his self-forgetfulness in his Master's cause, his unstinting love
towards his fellows, his earnestness of speech, his energy of
action, had something of an almost apostolic greatness about
them. . . . On the banner which he carried, the word ' Thorough '
was emblazoned. He did everything in a large way. Although
pure Gospel truth was far dearer to him than the dignity of his
* Lije of Daniel Wilsnt), D.D., Lord Bislop of Calcutta. Ey tho Eev. Josiah
Bateman, M.A. London : John Murray, 1860.
India: CifANCFS^ Rfforats^ DEJ^Er.orMENTs 293
hurcli, he strove mightily for the out\v;ird honour of that Part IV.
Chureli." ■■■ ^j;-/^ 1,'j-
When Wilson arrived in India, the Governor-General was Lord '''^^" " *
William Bentinck, whose Christian profession — with that of his Lord w.
excellent wife — was more decided than in the case of any of the GoCerno''r'.
chief rulers since Lord Teignmouth. He and the Bishop hccame General,
fast friends, notwithstanding that he was entirely opposed to
ecclesiastical estahlishments and dignities of any kind, bishoprics
included. The Bishop wrote of "the noble character of his
administration," and said, "I verily believe we shall never see
his like again. Had he been educated in Church principles, he
would be perfect ! But he does not even know what is meant by
an Archdeacon !" There was, in fact, a general improvement in
the character of Indian officials. Worldliness of course still
prevailed ; and the Bishop was often shocked, when on his
tours, by the openly vicious lives lived by some. Still things
were better than they had been. "There was," says Kaye, "a
devout spirit abroad in Anglo-Indian Society. The English in
India had outlived the old reproach of irreligion and immorality.
To be a regular attendant at church, to be strict in family worship,
to subscribe to missionary objects and to attend missionary
meetings, was in no wise to stand out conspicuously from the
crowd. In some regiments, the ' new lights,' as they were
profanely called, were so numerous that they ceased to be ex-
ceptions, and therefore were no longer objects of derision." To
what was this change due? Mainly, under God, to the godly
chaplains whom Simeon had engaged and Grant had sent forth.
Lord W^illiam Bentinck's Governor-Generalship was signalized
by great and important reforms and advances, which had a His great
distinct beai'ing on the cause of Christianity in India. In effecting reforms,
these. Lord William was, during part of his time, strongly sup-
ported by Charles Grant the younger, when President of the
Board of Control. By various enactments it became penal (1) for
widows to be burnt alive on their husbands' funeral pyres, (2) to
mui'der parents, by drowning, or exposure, or burial alive, (3) to
murder children by leaving them on the river bank to be the prey
of crocodiles, (4) to encourage devotees to destroy themselves by
throwing themselves under the wheels of idol-cars, (5) to promote
voluntary torture by hook-swinging, &c., (G) to offer human
sacrifices ; although all these crimes were done in the name of
religion. Other reforms were initiated to dissociate the British
Government from open patronage of idolatry ; to admit Native
Christians to public offices equally with Hindus and Moham-
medans ; and to relieve converts from any one religion to another
of disabilities touching the holding of property.
•Vll these reforms were vehemently opposed, not only by leading
Hindus, but by influential Anglo-Indians. The cry was again
* Chrii^tianiiii in India, p. 4i5.
294 India : Changes^ Reforms^ Developments
Part IV. raised that it was dangerous to meddle with ancient and beneficent
1824-41 rehgions ; and some of the Em-opeans defended the old barbarities
^^' ' with greater persistence than the more enlightened Natives them-
Aboiition selvcs. The first reform was the abolition of Suttee, or widow-
of Suttee, burning. Shocking accounts of individual recent cases of this
terrible custom, taken from official reports presented to Parlia-
ment, were published in the Missionary Begistcr/'- Christian
officers who came home described the horrors they had themselves
witnessed.! And as regards the prevalence of Suttee, a parlia-
mentary paper stated that, in Bengal alone, 5997 widows had
been burnt alive in the preceding ten years.]: Yet in the very
same blue-book, an Anglo-Indian official vindicated the rite as a
species of voluntarj'- death, " as when a high-spirited female, in
defence of her chastity, prefers loss of life to loss of honour," and
deprecated the abolition of what (to use his own words) they
considered " a light affliction working for them an exceeding
weight of glory " ! § And Lord Ashley (afterwards Lord Shaftes-
bury) when in office at the India Board in 1828 was "put down
at once as a madman " because he thought Suttee wrong, jj But
Mr. Buxton in Parliament, and Mr. Poynder, a solicitor on the
C.M.S. Committee, in the Court of East India Directors, were
agitating for the abolition of this "light affliction"; and in 1829
Lord William Bentinck, by a stroke of his pen, put an end to
Suttee. 11 Other enactments followed, forbidding the various
crimes above enumerated.
East India In 1833, twcuty ycars had elapsed since the memorable revision
chTrte"^ ^ of the East India Company's Charter in 1813, and the time had
renewed come for a further revision. Now came Charles Grant's oppor-
tunity. He not only completely altered the position of the
Company as a commercial body, throwing the Indian trade open
to the world, but he threw the country open too, and it was no
longer necessary for every missionary or other ' ' interloper ' ' to
get the Company's license to settle there. Moreover, he secured,
at last, the authority to erect two more bishoprics, and the money
to support them. Without him, little would have been done.
There was no excitement in the religious world, as in 1813 ; and
the C.M.S. Eeports scarcely notice the sul)ject. The Company
had conciliated the Christian public by the abolition of Suttee, and
also by a despatch to India on the very eve of the Charter Bill
coming before Parliament.
This memorable despatch, inspired by Charles Grant, dealt with
the great and complicated subject of the connexion of the State with
* See vol. for 1824, pp. 2.38, 278. Some of these accoinits sliowcd tliat
•VTidow-burning was not always voluntary, cases being given of yonng widows
forced, screaming, on to the funeral pile.
t Ihid., 182.5, p. 2.56. + Ibid., 1828, p. 75.
^ Ihid., 1828, p. 75. !| Life of Lord SJiafteslury, vol. i. p. 82.
"^ The official Regulation is printed in the Mixsionani Reai.'^ter for 1830,
p. 185.
/.yd/a: Cf/AycE.'s^ Reform!^ ^ Development!^ 295
idolatry. The theory of the Government of Indica was absolute Part IV.
religious neutrality and toleration ; hut the theory broke down in i^^'^^' ,'
practice. When the British arms conquered and annexed an '''^^"
Indian state, large or small, the British rule of course succeeded state
to the responsibilities and duties of the dispossessed governments. ^f|do"rt^ry.
Now these often included grants to temples and mosques, the
collection of taxes and dues for their maintenance, the administra-
tion of lands belonging to them, police protection for idolatrous
rites, and honours (such as salute-firing) to idol-festivals. The
English governors and administrators in a newly-annexed district
simply continued the practice of their Native predecessors,
generally quite oblivious of the fact that this really involved the
patronage, by a professedly Christian nation, of religious systems
and customs that were not only false but cruel and degrading ;
and even when they came to think about it, they justified it on
the ground that to withdraw the aid and protection so given would
be an interference with the religions of the country, and therefore
inconsistent with the neutrahty professed. It was Claudius
Buchanan who first roused the Christian conscience of England
by his account of the horrors of Juggernaut, of which he was an
eye-witness in 1806. The temple and its abominable rites were
actually supported by what was called the pilgrim-tax, a capitation The
tax imposed on the hundreds of thousands of pilgrims who f^lf "'""
resorted to them, collected by government officials, handed to the
Brahman priests, and any balance (generally a large one) appro-
priated for the general revenue of the Company. In other words,
as Kaye expi-esses it, the British Government in India "acted as
churchwarden to Juggernaut." The system of which this was
typical gradually became more and more offensive in the eyes of
Christian men in England ; and at the public meetings of the
missionary societies the pilgrim-tax became a common object of
denunciation. The question, however, was not a simple one.
Supposing the tax abolished, would not that encourage more
pilgrims to resort to the temples? And as regards temple estates,
would not a withdrawal from their administration tempt the
Native trustees who might be appointed to peculation and corrup-
tion ? Charles Grant, however, set himself solemnly, and as in
the sight of God, to consider the whole subject ; and the result
was his deep conviction that England must wash its hands of all
association with idolatry, whatever the consequences. Having
come to this decision, he persuaded the reluctant Directors to fall
in with his view, and the famous despatch of 1833 was sent out, °''^"*^^^
amid a chorus of thanksgiving from all who cared for the ^^^^ ^
evangelization of India.
But it was one thing to send such a despatch, and quite Jh^e ^^^^
another thing to get it obeyed. In the Madras Presidency it evadldl
was openly ignored — the new Bishop of jMadras (of whom more
presently) being publicly rebuked by the Governor in Council
for presenting (in 1835) a respectful memorial from the clergy
296
India : Chakges^ Reforms^ Developments
Part IV.
1824r-41.
Chap. 21.
Sir P.
Maitland
resigns.
Victory
at last.
and godly laity on the subject. But Lord W. Bentinck was"
not now at the head of the Supreme Government at Calcutta,
nor was Charles Grant (who had become Lord Glenelg) any
longer at the Board of Control ; and the East India Directors
in Leadenhall Street resisted every effort made by Mr. Poynder
and others to get the despatch of 1833 carried out. In 1837, the
year of Queen Victoria's accession, the Company, inspired by a
new President of the Board of Control, Sir John Hobhouse, sent
out a discreditable despatch, virtually approving of the delay in
carrying out its orders of four years before ; whereupon a startling
event occurred. Sir Peregrine Maitland, Commander-in-Chief of
the Madras Army, resigned his post rather than give any further
directions to the troops to do honour to the idols. '■' This grand act
of self-sacrifice won the battle. The excitement in Christian
circles in England was intense ; Parliament was roused,! and
Sir J. Hobhouse had to promise to send out peremptory orders
that the despatch of 1833 was to be obeyed without further delay.
This was done in August, 1838, and left no excuse for the local
Indian authorities. Nevertheless, further measures had to be
taken ; and though the instructions were partially carried out, it
was not till 1841 that public honours to idols were finally
abolished. All through these years, the Church Missionary
Society was strongly exercised on the subject, and repeatedly
memorialized the Home Government ; and great was the rejoicing
when at last the victory had been really won, and the disgrace to
Christian England finally wiped out.];
* His exact act was this. Two Christian privates had refused to fire their
muskets to salute an idolatrous procession ; and Sir P. Maitland refused to
sign the order for their punishment. " He called his family round liim,
explained to them the poverty into which they would be plunged by his
resignation. They united in desiring that he should obey liis conscieace.
All the Army, including the Duke of Wellington, thought him wrong, and
the East India Company condemned him ; but his manly and straightforward
explanation of his conduct won the Duke over to his side, and at length the
G^overniQ«nt gave him the governorship of the Cape of Good Hope." (From
Venn's Private Journals, 18.54.) A different and very interesting version
Avas given by the late Rev. J. H. Gi'ay in tlie C'./T/. Intelligencer of September,
1887. Mr. Gray was at Madras at the time, and he states that one of the first
papers put before Sir P. Maitland for signature was a document sanctioning
the appointment and payment of dancing-girls for a certaiu Hindii temple.
This he refused to sign, and appealed to the Company. The Directors
declined to give way, and Maitland thereupon resigned.
t Mr. Gray (see preceding note) further states that ho himself subse-
quently sent home to Maitland an account and sketch of an outrageous act
of homage to an idol committed by a high English official ; and Bishop
Blomfield took them to the House of Lords, exhibited them there, and
threatened to send the sketch broadcast over the country ; and that this
menace settled the question in Parliament.
X The whole history can be traced out in the Missionary Register, 1832 to
1841. It is summarized in Kaye's Christianity in India, pp. 418 — 430, and,
inore briefly, in an able paper by Mr. (now Sir) W. Mackworth Young, now
Lieut. -Governor of the Punjab, read before the Cambridge Church Missionary
LTnion, and printed in the O.M. Intelligencer of February, 1885.
India : Changes^ Reforms^ Develoi'Ments 297
This period ^vas one of material as %Yell as moral reform and Part IV.
development. It was one of important services rendered by very }^^^~^h
eminent civil servants of the Company. For example, Eobert ^^_
Merttins Bird, who, while at the head of the Eevenue Department r. m. Bird
in the North- West Provinces, planned and carried out the sm'vey Thoma^on.
and land settlement of that immense territory, becoming thereby
recognized as the chief authority on a most complicated subject,
and saving tw^enty millions of people from misery and ruin.
Dr. G. Smith mentions James Thomason, John Lawrence, and
William Muir, as coming "under the spell of Merttins Bird"; "■
and Sir E. Temple says that Bird, " a born leader of men," and
Thomason, "formed the great school of administrators in the
North-West Provinces."! "To have been selected by Eobert
Bird," says Mr. Bosworth Smith, " as a helper in the great work
in which he was engaged, was looked upon as a feather in the cap
even of those who were destined soon to eclipse the fame
of their old patron." \ Thomason wrote that he found Bird
"so instructive and communicative on subjects which regard
another world," and they discussed together " how to carry
out their Christian principles into their daily walk as public
servants." § His and his sister's work in the C.M.S. Gorakhpur
Mission will be mentioned hereafter. On his retirement to Eng-
land he became a regular and valuable member of the C.M.S.
Committee.
One branch of material progress must be noticed, because
it has had untold influence upon the practical working of India
Missions. This was the establishment of steam communication steamers
between England and India. Moreover it was under Lord E^ngiand
W. Bentinck's administration that the initiative was taken, and ^"'1 India,
the virtual leader in taking it was Bishop Daniel Wilson.
It has been mentioned that the news of Heber's death on
April 2nd reached England in September. That one fact suf-
ficiently illustrates the position at the time. On December 9th,
1825, four months before Heber died, the first steamer fi-om
England reached Calcutta ; but she had come round the Cape,
and taken five months to accomplish the voyage, — no faster, in
fact, than the old East Indiamen ; and it was found that even a
full complement of passengers in "the cabin" would not pay for
the fuel expended. II Natui'ally, nothing more was done. When
Daniel Wilson arrived at Calcutta in 1832, he found the question
revived, and under discussion. It interested him at once ; for no man
ever felt more keenly the separation from home friends. " Three
points of abstinence," he said, " would promote calmness of mind
* Twelve Indian Statesmen, p. 75. Bii'd's second name is \-ariously spelt in
different books. " Merttins " is the correct form,
t Men and Erenf.i of Mij Time in India, p. 41).
X Life nf Lord l.awrencc, vol. i. p. 9(3.
§ Rulers of India : r/wiiia.soH, by Sir R. Temple. P. 71.
II Missionary Register, 1825, p. 599; 1826, p. 26 J.
:q8
India : Ci/anges^ Reforms^ Developments
Part IV.
] 82-4-41.
Chap. 21.
Bishop
Wilson
heads the
movement,
The
P. & O.
service.
in India : (1) never to look at a thermometer ; (2) never to talk
about the arrival or non-arrival of ships ; (3) never to reckon
up minutely the weeks and months of residence." Good rules,
observes his biographer, but never so badly kept as in his case ;
for he constantly made written notes of all three circumstances !
But his keen desire for quicker communication with the home-
land led him to throw himself into the new projects. A public
meeting to promote them was held, at which he was not present ;
and it was a failure. No money was subscribed; and without
money nothing could be done. The very next morning Lord W.
Bentinck and Mr. (afterwards Sir) Charles Trevelyan met him out
riding ; and the latter said to the Bishop, " My Lord, I wish you
would step forward." Daniel Wilson that day wrote a letter to
the chief magistrate, offering donations from himself and family
for so great an object. The letter was published, and received
with enthusiasm ; another meeting was held, the Bishop himself
presiding; and in a few weeks two thousand five hundred
subscribers had raised 167,000 rupees, then equal to nearly
£20,000. The Bishop continued at the head of the movement.
He wrote to influential people in England — thirteen long letters to
Charles Grant alone. " To have a certain post," he said,
"starting on a given day, arriving at a given day, returning at a
given day — and that day one-half earlier than the average arrivals
now — would be as life from the dead ! Positively it would make
India almost a suburb of London ! " And he dwelt on the
influence of inventions in other ages upon moral progress : — •
" What an invention the mariner's compass ! What an invention
the art of printing ! By these two discoveries the world became
accessible to knowledge and improvement. The Eeformation
sprang from their bosom." *
His energy was successful. Charles Grant introduced the
question in the House of Commons, from the Treasury Bench,
on June 3rd, 1834 ; a Parliamentary Committee reported favour-
ably ; Government subsidies were offered ; mail steamers were set
running between England and Alexandria; other steamers (at
first four times a year !) between Suez and IBombay ; in 1841 the
P. k 0. Company organized the latter service systematically,
with steamers of the great size (as then thought ! ) of 1600 tons and
500 horse-power ; and India was brought within two months of
England. The Suez Canal was not then dreamed of ; nor the
gigantic and luxurious vessels that now bring us letters in twelve
days. But great issues spring from small beginnings ; and it will
interest all readers of this History to find that the man who really
set the ball rolling was the great Evangehcal Missionary Bishop
of Calcutta.
It has been mentioned that the Charter Act of 1833 provided for
* This narrative is condensed from a long account in the Lije of Biiliop D.
Wilson, vol. i. chap. 12.
India : Changes^ Reforms^ Developments 299
the establishment of two new bishoprics, viz., for Madras and Part IV.
Bombay. This was really in pursuance of a plan laid before lS24-il.
Grant and the Government by Bishop Wilson prior to his ^'^' '
departure for India ; and great was his joy when he heard of its New
being included in the Bill. Let it be remembered that this was Mld'Tas*'^^ '
the Eeform Ministry, by which the Irish Church was being and Bom-
despoiled of several of its bishoprics, whose chief had told the ^^'
English Bishops to set their houses in order, and whose doings
inspired Keble's memorable sermon at Oxford on National
Apostasy ; and we see the more clearly what India owed to
Charles Grant, the worthy son of his distinguished father.
Wilson at once wrote home asking that Archdeacon Corrie might
be Bishop of Madras, that Archdeacon Robinson of Madras
might be Bishop of Bombay, and that Archdeacon Carr of Bombay
might succeed Corrie in the Archdeaconry of Calcutta. Various
delays, however, ensued ; but at length, in 1835, Corrie, having
come home, was consecrated first Bishop ot Madras. Carr
ultimately became first Bishop of Bombay, but this was not
till 1837.
Thus, at length, one of the ' five chaplains " who had kept the Bishop
Gospel lamp burning in Bengal in the Dark Period prior to 1813
became a bishop of the Church he had so faithfully served. For
nearly thirty years, Corrie, gentle and unobtrusive as he was in
character, and chaplain as he was in ecclesiastical status, bad ■
been indisputably the chief missionary of the Church of England
in India. Almost all the mission stations in North India had
been started by him. He had never sought great things for
himself. He just " served his own generation by the will of
God," with a quiet devotion and unfailing discretion that had
made him loved and trusted by all. And now, having passed his
years va the North, he entered a new sphere of labour in the
South as Bishop of Madras. But it was for a little while only.
For rather more than a year he so acted as to win all hearts —
except those of the irate governor and officials who resented his
gentle protest against their disobedience to the order forbidding
honours to idols, — and then God took him, on February 5th, His death.
1837, to the intense grief of all Christians in India, and of the
Church Missionary Society at home. He was succeeded by
Bishop Spencer ; and when Carr was consecrated to the new
see of Bombay, there were, at last, three Bishops for India.
During Corrie's brief episcopate, there was one matter which
much burdened his mind. This was the great Caste Question in The Caste
the Native Church. It had not troubled him during his long Question,
career in the North. Caste difficulties have never been so acute
there as in the South. For one thing, the influence of Moham-
medanism has tended to minimize the influence of the minute
distinctions and restrictions which in the South reign undisturbed.
The Brahmans, of course, are strict everywhere ; but the numerous
lower castes are far more jealously marked off in the South than
300 India : Changes^ J^eforms^ DEVELorMENrs
1824-^7" "^ ^^^® North. In Bengal, for instance, a Sudra is a low-caste
Chap 21 '^^^" ' '^'■^*' !^ Madras, he is a high-caste man, because there are
L ' beneath him endless further ramifications of the system. For
another thing, Native Christian communities scarcely existed in
the North in Corrie's time ; but in the South they were numerous,
and there was room within the Church for the development of
the caste spirit. In fact, as has been l^efore mentioned, the
Danish and German missionaries who had gathered these com-
caste in muuities permitted the retention in the Church of many cherished
c'hu'^ch'''^ caste customs. A note to one of Bishop Wilson's Charges
enumerates fifty distinct usages common among them w^aich he
regarded as inconsistent with the spirit of Christianity. The
principal were these : — the different castes entered church by
diiferent doors, and sat on different sides; they received the
Lord's Supper separately, sometimes using separate cups ; the
missionary himself had to receive last, for fear of defihng the
Sudra communicants ; a Sudra catechist or minister would not
reside in a Pariah village, nor would a Sudra congregation receive
a Pariah teacher ; a Christian Sudra would give his daughter to
a Heathen of the same caste rather than to a fellow-Christian of
a lower caste, and several other degrading distinctions affected
the relations betw^een the sexes. Moreover, the Christians, in
order to retain their positions in the castes they respectively
belonged to, "mingled with the Heathen and learned their
works ": they observed heathen rites, employed heathen dancers
and musicians at festivals, wore heathen caste-marks, and so
forth.
Attitude _ The three or four old S.P.C.K. missionaries who still supervised
"' the Tamil congregations in Bishop Heber's time, including the
venerable and venerated Kohlhoff, had tolerated these usages, as
their predecessors had done, though without liking them. ]3ut
the younger men w^ho now began to arrive in the country, some
sent by the S.P.C.K. itself, some by the C.M.S., and some, a few
years later, by the S.P.G., w^ere disposed to adopt a firmer
attitude against them ; and of these Ehenius, the C.M.S.
missionary, was the virtual leader. Heber was appealed to on
tlie subject, and he was about to inquire into it on the spot when
of Bishop he died at Trichinopoly. He had, however, formed a prehminary
^ '"'' and tentative opinion, chiefly based on the views of Christian
David, the Ceylon Tamil whom he had ordained at Calcutta.
David urged, as so many have done before and since, that caste
was merely a matter of social distinction ; and Heber, mindful
of the social distinctions in England itself, which have nothing
to do with religion, was inclined to take a lenient view of caste
customs. But in India caste is far indeed from being a mere
social system. It is, in fact, the strongest religious influence in
the country. It is not that a respectable and cleanly man objects
to eat with a man of dirty habits. On the contrary, the vilest
beggar who is a Sudra by descent would consider himself defiled
of mission
aii
lyDi.i: C/f.\\<:/:s, A'/:/-oa'jUS, Dev ELorMi-Ms \o\
by contact with an educated and respectable Pariah. This was I'akt IV.
the system that was eatin^^ the hfc out of the Native Church ; and '^^^1-4] .
it cannot be doul)t('(l th;it. llchcr would liave soon perceived its ''" '
evil had he Hved.
]5ishop Wilson was face to face with the question as soon as he rf Bisiop
arrived in India. He took a strong lino at once. Basing his ^''^°"-
decision on the grand New Testament principle that in Chi-istianity
" there is neither Gi'eek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision,
Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free, l)ut Christ is all, and in all,"
h(; directed that, as i-egards Church usages, "caste must be
abandoned, decidedly, immediately, finally." But when his letter
was read to the principal congregations, at Vepery, Trichinopoly,
and Tanjore, the Sudra Christians openly revolted. At Tanjore,
where KohlhoCf had presided over the Church for many years, not
only did the bulk of the congregation at once secede, but the
majority of the native ministers or " country priests," catechists,
schoolmasters, and other mission employes, refused compliance,
despite the entreaties of their senior, the venerable Nyanapragasen,
then eighty-three years of age ; and all these were thereupon
dismissed. l\\ 1835, Bisho]) Wilson visited the South, and dealt Bishop
earnestly and lovingly with the disaffected Christians, pleading ^nj°re**
with them the example of the Good Samaritan, who did not sto]>
to ask who the "certain man " was, nor dreamed of Ix-ing dcliled
by touching him. "And what," exclaimed the Bishop, rising
from his scat in the crowded chuirb, "did our Messed Master
say to this? (In, and do tlioiu likcvjise." "A long pause," says
his biographer, " of motionless and breathless silence followed,
broken only when he besought every one present to offer up this
prayer, — ' Lord, give me a broken heart, to receive the love of
Christ and obey His coimnands." Whilst the whole congregatioii
were repeating this in Tamil, he bowed upon the cushion, doubt-
less entreating liel[) fi'oni (lod, and tlien dismissed them witli bis
blessing." ■■'•
Nevertheless, all his efforts proved luisuccessful ; and at
Trichino])oly he began a definitely-arranged plan for the adminis-
tration of the Holy Connnunion, to servo as an object-lesson.
Pie quietly directed who should come up to receive : first a Sudra
catechist, then two Pariah catechists, then an ]<]nglish gentleman,
then a Sudra again ; and to assist his design, the liighest English
lady in rank at the station requested that a Pai'iah might kneel
between her and her husband. In this way, a formal step was
taken ; and it served to band together tJiose Native Christians
who conformed. But the majority held aloof; and for many
years great difliculties beset these old Missions, des})ite the earnest
work of the new English missionaries whom the S.P.G. — having
ere this entirely taken over the work fiom the S.P.C.K. — was
about this time beginning to send out. In after years the
* Lijc of Bibluip D. Wilsov, vol. i. p. 163.
302
IxDiA : Changes^ Reforms, Developments
Part IV.
182-i-41.
Chap. 21.
Education
in India.
The Hindu
College.
Alexander
Duff.
difficulties rather increased, owing to the action of the new
Mission of the Leipsic Lutheran Society, which allowed caste
(and does so still), and drew away many members of the S.P.G.
congregations. The C.M.S. and S.P.G. Missions in Tinnevelly
have from time to time had similar difficulties to meet ; and
indeed they have never been fully surmounted. A serious crisis
in the C.M.S. Krishnagar Mission, in Bengal, forty years later,
will meet us in due course. Meanwhile the question has been
noticed in this place in connexion with the three Bishops who
first dealt with it.
We must now turn to a large and important subject which
much occupied the minds of thinking men in India during the
period under review — the question of Education.
If the British rule was to be perpetuated in India, it was felt
that the people must be educated. Their degrading supersti-
tions were largely due to ignorance ; and the enlightenment of
their minds would open the way to higher moral influences.
Moreover, unless the government was always to remain a pure
despotism, preparation must be made for the Natives in due time
sharing in the work of administration and legislation. It was not,
however, till Lord William Bentinck took up the question, that
anything definite was done by the Government. In the mean-
while, in 1818, Carey and his associates had projected a college
at Serampore for the higher education of Natives. But that
institution, though in time it came to do excellent work, was not
in Calcutta. The only attempt made at the capital — where such
an attempt was most needed — was what was called the Hindu
College, opened in 1817 under the joint auspices of a few English-
men and Hindus. In this institution English was taught, and
English literature and science studied, in the teeth of the opinion
then prevailing in Government circles, under the influence of the
great Sanscrit scholar, H. H. Wilson, that the right kind of higher
education for the Indian people w^as the study of classical Oriental
languages, such as Sanscrit and Persian. But the Hindu College
was strictly non-Christian, and virtually anti-Christian. The
English text-books read w^ere Hume's Essays and the licentious
plays of the age of Charles II. ; and even Tom Paine 's works
were read with avidity out of school-hours. The consequence
was such a flood of immorality that the very Heathen parents
themselves were alarmed ; and the whole cause of English study
was discredited.
But now there arrived in Calcutta a man whom God had chosen
to guide the new ambition to learn English into Christian channels,
and to initiate one of the most important of agencies for the
evangelization of India. That man was Alexander Duff.
Duff was a young Highlander ; and at first sight it seems hard
to connect him with Charles Simeon of Cambridge. Yet one of
the grand things which, all unconsciously, Simeon was in the
Lord's hands the instrument of doing, was the forging of the first
India : Changes^ JiEFORMS, Developments 303
link in the chain of events that led to the great Educational Part IV,
Missions of India. Going back to the year in which Simeon read 182-i-l] .
that paper before the Eclectic Society which originated the Chap^2l.
Church Missionary Society, 1796, we find that in the summer a retro-
of that same year he took holiday and went to Scotland. At l,'?"*-^ .
Moulin, the parish which now contams the lamihar Fitlocline, he the parish
visited Mr. Stewart, an able Presbyterian minister of " Moderate " ?ath^r"^^
views, who "preached a pure and high morality, and held in a
certain sense the doctrines of Christian orthodoxy"; but who
" saw no satisfying results of his labour among his people, and
was himself restlessly conscious that secrets of spiritual joy and
power lay near him undiscovered." '■-- Indeed, one Sunday he
told his people so, asking them to pray that he might have more
light, and promising that if he got it, he would impart it to them ;
which led many to go to church week after week from curiosity,
wondering what new revelation would come. Then came Simeon,
and Mr. Stewart invited him to speak a few words to the con-
gregation. " I expressed," writes Simeon, " my fears respecting
the formality which obtains among all the people, and urged them
to devote themselves truly to Jesus Christ." But he adds, " I
was barren and dull : God, however is the same, and His word is
unchangeable." Yes, and God worked. That night Mr. Stewart
came to Simeon's bedroom, and opened his heart to him ; and
from that day forth, with satisfied mind and rejoicing heart he
preached Jesus Christ and Him crucified, with the result that,
both at Moulin and afterwards in other parishes, numbers of souls
were converted to God. Now in that congregation was a lad of
seventeen, James Dulf. Whether he was present when Simeon
preached, and whether he was impressed, we know not ; but
under Mr. Stewart's now faithful ministry he was led to yield
himself to the Lord. Ten years afterwards, his son Alexander
was born ; and this son always attributed his own decision for
Christ to the influence and example of his father. So Dr. George
Smith begins his brilliant Life of Duff with, these words, — " The
spiritual ancestry of Alexander Duff it is not difficult to trace to
Charles Simeon." f
In due course Alexander Duff went to St. Andrew's University, ^^'^^"'^
and having taken the highest honours in classics, sat down to
study theology at the feet of Dr. Chalmers, then at the height of
his great reputation. Chalmers was one of the few Scotchmen who
then cared for Missions, and during his five years at St. Andrew's
six of his most distinguished students dedicated themselves to
the foreign field. But the EstabUshed Church of Scotland was
* Moule's Simeon, p. 159.
f The story is partly told iu the opening pages of Dr. G. Smith's Life of
Duff ; but in the middle of the first volume (p. 326) one comes upon a fuller
and more touching account, <■, propos of Duff's visit to Cambridge in 1836.
Fifty years later, a sou of Mr. Stewart's was an elder of the Scotch Church
at Caliutta, and held prayer-meetings with Duff's converts. {Life, vol. ii.
p. 56.)
304 India : Chaages^ Reforms^ Developments
Part IV. not yet a missionary Church. It was still largely of the opinion
1824-41. Qf ij^g Moderator of thirty years before, who in 1796 (the very year
^^' ' of Simeon's visit to Moulin) had said that " to spread the Gospel
among heathen nations seems highly preposterous, in so far as it
anticipates, nay it even reverses, the order of nature " ! The
Scotch Missions previously mentioned in this History, in West
Africa and in Russia, were the work of a small voluntary society.
But a few leading men in the Church, notably Dr. Inglis, were
now waking up to see that Scottish Presbyterianism should have
representatives in India : not chaplains only — them it had already
— but missionaries also ; and at length, in 1829, Alexander Duif
Duff to was ordained to be the first foreign missionary officially sent forth
Calcutta. ,3y ^j^g Church of Scotland.
After suffering shipwreck twice on his voyage out, the young
minister, twenty-four years of age, landed at Calcutta in May,
1830. When the Natives who could read the newspapers saw the
account of his escape from two shipwrecks, they said, " Surely
this man is a favourite of the gods, who must have some notable
work for him to do in India." After visiting every missionary
and mission station in and round Calcutta, he formed his own
Duff's plan for an entirely new agency. It was " to lay the foundation
scheme. ^j ^ systcm of education which might ultimately embrace all the
branches ordinarily taught in the higher schools and colleges of
Christian Europe, but in inseparable combination with the Chris-
tian faith and its doctrines, precepts, and evidences, with a view
to the practical regulation of life and conduct. Eeligion was to
be, not merely the foundation upon which the superstructure of
all useful knowledge was to be reared, but the animating spirit
tvhich was to pervade and halloio all." ■■'■ The Bible was to be
read and expounded daily, " while the teacher prayed, at the same
time, that the truth might be brought home, by the grace of the
Spirit, for the real conversion to God of at least some of the stu-
dents." In view of the teachings of Scripture and Church history,
Duff " did not expect that all, or the majority, of these Bengali
youths would certainly be thus turned ; for in nominal Christen-
dom he felt that few have been, or are, so changed, under the
most favourable circumstances. That ' many are called but few
chosen,' however, only quickened his zeal. But he did expect
that, if the Bible were thus faithfully taught or preached, some at
least would be turned from their idols to serve the living God." f
Its in- Such is the system which almost all the principal missionary
fluence societics in India have since adopted, which has often been
results. assailed for its paucity of direct results, but the indirect results of
which have been incalculable. Even in direct results, it has not
failed those who have worked it on Duff's principles as above
stated. Let it be granted that the true converts from among the
higher and educated classes in India have been few in comparison
* Dr. G. Smith, Life of Dn£ vol. i. p. 110. t Ibid., p. 109.
IxD/A : C//.i.yc/:s, REJ-oRArs^ DkyKLOPMEsrs 305
with the whole villages of poor cultivators that have come over Part IV.
in the South. But it is as true at home as in India that " not l^-+-^l-
many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble "^'' " '
are called" ; and as a matter of historical fact, scarcely one such
convert has been made in India except through the agency, direct
or indirect, of Missionary Education.
But although it is too late to criticize the system now, one is
not surprised that it was opposed at first. Dr. Bryce, the senior The plan
Presbyterian chaplain, whose chief occupation seems to have been °PP°sed.
fighting the Anglican bishop (at least in Middleton's time) on
points of precedence and the like, and whose great church was
empty while the godly Scotch people went elsewhere, gave Duff
no sympathy." Nor did a single missionary in Calcutta approve
the young Scotchman's project. " You will deluge the city,"
they said, "with rogues and villains." But the Hindu College
was doing that already. There was no means of stopping the
demand for English now. The stream of tendency was rising
rapidly, and all that could be done was to direct it into good
channels. That was Duff's purpose. He found no fault with the
simple preaching and teaching already in vogue, though the
I'esults so far had been infinitesinuxl. There were then less than
twenty converts from Hinduism or Mohammedanism in Cal-
cutta, half of them Anglican and half Baptist. But Duff said,
" While you engage in directly separating as many precious
atoms from the mass as stubborn resistance to ordinary appliances
can admit, we shall, with the blessing of God, devote our time
and strength to the preparing of a mine, and the setting up of a
train which shall one day explode and tear up the whole from
its lowest depths." I And God gave him, too, some "precious
atoms," sooner than he or any one else thought possible.
But though Duff got no support from the older missionaries, he
was greatly encouraged by one remarkable Hindu — Ram Mohun Ram
Roy, the Erasmus of India, as Dr. George Smith calls him. R°y ""
Forty years before, without ever coming across a missionary
(for there were none), Ram Mohun Roy had recoiled from the
degrading superstitions of Patna and Benares, and had written
an attack on " the idolatrous system of the Hindus." The study
of English subsequently introduced him to the Bible, and tlien
to the further study of Greek and Hebrew. In 1814 he founded
the Brahmo Sabha — the progenitor of the Brahmo Samaj — " to
teach and to practise the worship of one supreme, undivided,
* It oupht, however, to be stated tliat Dr. Hryce had, in IS2.5, written homo
to the General Assonihly, askin<? that aufjust body to send out one or two
Scotch chTfryinen wlio coidd 8j)eak, Hke tlio.se of the Clmreli of Knjjland, witli
tlie sanction of an " Kcck'siastical Kstablisliment," so tliat their Mission niiffht
liave the sii])))ort of " Constituted Kcck'siastical Authority." Uur Presbj-terian
brethren of the Churcli of Scotland have always laid even more stress on
their "Established" position than the old-fashioni'd Hi^'h Churchmen of
Eiifjland.
t Dr. G. Smith's Dk/, p. 108.
VOL. I. X
3o6 India : Changes^ Reforms^ Developments
Part IV. and eternal God." The orthodox Hindus thereupon founded the
1824-41. Dharma Sabha, m defence of Brahmanism Avith all its rites and
Chap. 21. customs, such as Suttee. "Thus," says Dr. G. Smith, "Hindu
society in Calcutta became divided into opposing camps, while
the Hindu College youths formed a third entrenchment in support
of pure atheism and libertinism. These were the three powers at
work, unconnected by any agency save the slow and indirect
influence of English literature in the hands of vicious teachers,
unopposed by Christianity in any form, denounced at a distance,
but not once fairly grappled with, by any Christian man, from the
Bishop to the Baptist missionaries."
Eam Mohun Eoy had already given important aid to Lord W.
Bentinck in the abolition of Suttee. Now he warmly w^elcomed
Duff Duff, entered into his projects, heartily approved of his determina-
be-ins. ^jq^ ^q have Scripturc-rcading and prayer in the proposed school,
and lent him the small hall of the Brahmo Sabha to begin his
work in. On July 13th, 1830, only six weeks after landing —
having learned some Bengali on his long voyage — Duff opened
his new school. Several high-class youths, most of them Brah-
mans by caste, had been persuaded by Eam Mohun Eoy to
attend. Ijet us read Dr. G. Smith's picturesque account of this
great and memorable day : '■'•• —
A memo- " Standing up with Earn Mohvm Roy, while all the lads showed the
"■^t)'^ same respect as their own rajah, the Christian missionary prayed the
scene. Lord's Prayer slowly in Bengah. A sight, an hour, ever to be remem-
bered ! Then came the more critical act. Himself putting a copy of
the Bengali Gospels into their hands, the missionary requested some of
the older pupils to read. There was murmuring among the Brahmans
among them, and this found voice in the Bengah protest of a leader —
' This is the Christian Shaster : we are not Christians ; how then can we
read it r' It may make us Christians, and our friends will drive us out of
caste.' Now was the time for Ram Mohun Roy, who explained to his
young countryman that they were mistaken. ' Christians like Dr.
Horace Hayman Wilson have studied the Hindu Shasters, and you know
that he has not become a Hindu. I myself have read all the Koran
again and again, and has that made me a Mussulman ? Nay, I have
studied the whole Bible, and you know I am not a Christian. Why then
do you fear to read it r* Read and judge for yourselves. Not compulsion,
but enlightened persuasion, which you may resist if you choose, con-
stitutes you yourselves judges of the contents of the hook.' Most of
the reuionstrants seemed satisfied."
succ;ss of Twelve months passed away. The school had become famous :
the ochooi. j;i-,j^.gg hundred boys were in regular attendance ; and the first
annual examination astounded the Enghsh residents who attended
it. Then Duff arranged for a quiet course of evening lectures in
his own house on Natural and Eevealed Eeligion, for students of
both his own school and the Hindu College. Twenty attended
the first ; but the second was never delivered. The whole city
was alarmed. Students of the Hindu College had attended a
* Li/e o/ BuS, vol. i. p. 121.
India : Changes^ Reforms^ Developments 307
Christian lecture in a missionary's house ! Dr. H. H. Wilson and Part IV.
the other anti-Christian Englishmen at the head of the Hindu ip*~i\'
College forhad their pupils to attend religious discussions ; and ^"P'
the Government were accused of letting a " wild Padre " hreak its
boasted neutrality. ])utjf sought a private interview with Lord
William Bentinck, who assured him of his deep sympathy, but
advised caution. But the young students of the Hindu College students
themselves resented the outcry, and boldly claimed liberty to nbe^y,
attend Christian lectures if they liked. They started a paper of and break
their owm, the Enquirer, w'hich was edited by the leading spirit
among them, Krishna Mohun Banerjea, a Kv;lin Brahman.'''
They ostentatiously met together and broke caste by eating beef,
and in their wild and unrestrained assertion of freedom, they
grossly insulted a holy Brahman by tossing the remains of their
repast into his inner court. Thereupon K. M. Banerjea (who,
how'ever, w^as not present w^hen this was done) was expelled from
family and home. " I was perfectly regardless of God," he after-
wards wrote, " yet He forgot me not." He and his associates,
sobered by the outcry, and convinced now that they w^anted some
positive truth to fill the " aching void " left by their apostasy
from Brahmanism, came and sat at Duff's feet to learn of
Christianity as humble seekers after truth.
Another twelve months passed ; and then, on August 28th,
1832, the first convert, Mohesh Chunder Ghose, was baptized ; The first
not, however, by Duff himself, but by the Eev. T. Dealtry, the ""^"t^-
successor of Thomason, in the Old Church of David Brown and
Buchanan and Henry Martyn and Corrie.f " A year ago,"
exclaimed the young convert after the baptism, " I w'as an atheist
and a materialist ; and what am I now ? A baptized Christian !
A year ago I was the most miserable of the miserable ; now, the
happiest of the happy ! . . . In fipitc of inyadf, I l:)ecame a Chris-
tian. Surely this must have been what the Bible calls grace, free
grace, sovereign grace, and if ever there was an election of grace
surely I am one." The next was Krishna Mohun Banerjea k. m.
himself. Long drawn towards Socinianism, and unwilling to ^"^''J^^-
" acknowledge the glory of the Eternal Trinity " — " God," he
said, " by the influence of His Holy Spirit, was graciously pleased
to open my soul to discern its sinfulness and guilt, and the suit-
ableness of the great salvation which centred in the atoning
death of a Divine Bedcenier." He was baptized on October 17th
in Duff's schoolroom, by Duff himself, but soon afterwards joined
the Church of England, and l)oth he and Mohesh became teachers
* The highest, most exclusive, most sacred section of the Brahmau caste.
t " For some unexplained reason," says Dr. G. Smith. But Mohesli
Chunder Ghose had been studying at Bishop's College, and the teachers thei'e
had no doubt spared no pains to make an Anglican of him. Moreover a
certain "Major P." (Major Ph]])]>s r), who belonged to the Old Church, had
taken him by tlie hand to lead him to Christ. S.P.d. licport for lb32, quoted
in the Mi.<siiiii(ii-y ttciiinler for 1833, ji. 535; also C.M.S. licpoii, IS-i'S, p. 12.
X 2
3o8
India : Changes, Reforms, Developments
Part IV,
1824-41.
Chap. 21.
Ram
Mohun
Roy's
death in
England.
English
language
in India.
in C.M.S. schools. Mohesh died in 1837, and his funeral sermon
was preached at the Old Church hij Banerjca, who had just been
ordained by Bishop Wilson. Banerjea was afterwards the leading
Native clergyman of the Church of England in Bengal, and was
attached to the S.P.G. Then on December 14th, 1832, came a
third, Gopinath Nundi, well-known in after years for his courageous
confession of Christ when captured by the bloodthirsty Moham-
medans in the great Mutiny. Once more, on April 21st, 1833,
Anundo Chund Mozumdar was baptized in the Scotch church.'''
Four "precious atoms" indeed! — and the precursors of many
more in after years.
Eam Mohun Eoy was not present at these baptisms. He had
come to England, and in England he died, in 1833. If in earlier
years he had known Duff, he might have been the Luther of
India. If in this country he had met Dr. Chalmers, to whom
Duff gave him a letter of introduction, he might (humanly
speaking) have been brought to Christ. But he fell, as so many
like him have done, into the hands of the Unitarians ; and he
died at Bristol, declaring that he was neither Christian, nor
Mohammedan, nor Hindu.
Duff's work was by no means confined to his school. He was
only four years in India before his health utterly gave w^ay, and he
was sent home, and remained at home six years. But during his
short period at Calcutta he was a power. In particular he inspired
Charles Trevelyan, who in his turn inspired T. B. (afterwards
Lord) Macaulay, who together inspired Lord William Bentinck,
with the doctrine that the English language must be fostered in
India. Not, indeed, to the disparagement or discouragement of
the vernaculars. No one knew better, or urged more strongly,
than Duff that no acquired language can ever replace the mother
tongue. But the Eenaissance for India was beginning ; and what
Greek had been to the European Renaissance of the fifteenth
century, some great language with a literature behind it must be
to India. Should it be Sanscrit, or Persian, or Arabic ? Yes,
said the Orientalists. No, said Duff, and Trevelyan, and
Macaulay ; let these be studied by linguistic and philological
experts, for their archaeological value ; but English must be the
medium for lifting the young Indian mind on to the higher plane
of Western culture, Western science, and Christian truth. Fierce
and prolonged was the struggle between the Oriento-maniacs and
the Anglo-maniacs, as the two parties were colloquially termed ;
but at last Macaulay's logic and eloquence, backed by the palpable
* Gopinath Nundi became a missionary of the American Presbyterian
Church. Anundo joined the London Missionary Society. Duff himself
explained that the reason why not one of the four remained in the service of
the Church of Scotland was that the Church had then no opening for them.
" If the ground of their reasons had not been removed," he wrote, " I should
not have expected any talented young man who burned with zeal to be
employed in arousing his countrymen, to remain with us — indeed I could not
ask any." — Lije of Duff, vol. i. p. 281.
I^DiA : C/fANGF.s^ Reforms, Developments 30Q
evidence furnished by Duff's college, won the day ; and Lord W. P^gy ly-
Bentinck closed his seven years' beneficent rule by issuing the (^5;^^\-^
order-in-council which decided the supremacy of the English '_
language in the Higher Education of India.
Both evil and good results have followed. But the evil was
sure to come, whatever the decision was ; while the good belongs
to the actual decision itself. To name only one thing. Every
cold season now. Christian lecturers and evangelists visit India, and
find ready for them eager audiences composed of the cream of
India's young manhood, and understanding English. To what
do they owe that '? They owe it to the foresight and determina-
tion of Bentinck, and Macaulay, and Trevelyan, and Duff.
These developments and reforms were greatly assisted by three
organs in the press. First, Duff started the Calcutta Christian The^press
Observer. Secondly, an old quarterly called the Friend of India, cutta."
conducted by the Serampore Baptist missionaries, was in 1835
changed into a weekly paper by Mr. J. C. Marshman, son of
Carey's colleague. Under his editorship, 1835 to 1852, it became
the leading journal of India ; and it continued so under the editor-
ship of Mr. Meredith Townsend (afterwards co-editor with Mr.
E. H. Hutton of the Siicctator), 1852 to 1859, and under that of
Dr. George Smith (whose admiral^le works are frequently referred
to in this History), 1859 to 1875— forty years altogether of unique
influence always exercised in a high Christian spirit. ^'^ Then
thirdly, in 1844 Captain (afterwards Sir John) Kaye, the historian
of the Mutiny, and of Christianity in India, in conjunction with
Marshman and Duff, and assisted by Henry Lawrence and other
brilliant officers and civilians, established the Calcutta Eevietv.
To the weekly Friend of India and the quarterly Calcutta Beview
the cause of progress and enlightenment in India owes much.
As to Duff's policy of Missionary Education, it has been the
pattern for the extensive work carried on in many parts of India
by the Church Missionary Society ; and therefore it is that the
foregoing short account of its inception and initiation has found
place in the pages of our History.
Duff found that in Scotland he had a work to do almost as ^^^^^
difficult, and at first as discouraging, as his work in India — to
arouse his Church to care for the evangelization of India. The
story of his campaign, first in the General Assembly, t and then
in the Presbyteries, as told by Dr. G. Smith, is thrilhng indeed;
and among the immediate results were the inspiring with mis-
sionary zeal of McCheyne and Somerville, and the actual sending
* It is interesting also that these three successive editors, Marslinian,
Townsend, and Smith, wei-e likewise successive Calcutta correspondents of
the Times.
■f His wonderful speech in the Assembly is described by Dr. G. Smith, who
gives some passajjes. The whole of it is printed in Pratt's Missionary
Re'/ister, and occupies no less than twenty-four columns in the June, Jul^-,
August, and September numbers of 1835.
3IO India: Changes, Rrfori\ts, Developments
Part IV. forth of John Anderson, Thomas Smith, and J. Murray Mitchell.
1824-41. Indeed, Scotland has given a far larger proportion of its ablest
^^^" ' ' ^^cl most cultured men to Foreign Missions than any other country
in the world. But this does not belong to our History. What
Duff's does belong to it is the magnificent speech which the young High-
Speech". lander — he was still only just thirty — delivered at the Church
Missionary Society's Anniversary in 1836,''' to which allusion has
before been made. No extracts can give any adequate idea of it,
and yet a few passages must be given.
" it is a most affecting thought," he began, " that in searching
for the most marvellous proofs of the fall of man, we are not
required to go to the outskirts of the terrestrial globe — to the
shores of New Zealand, or to the coast of Labrador ; but to visit
the vast region of the East, which enwraps in its bosom the cradle
of the human race, of Eeligion, of Science, of the Patriarchal
Faith, yea, of Christianity itself." This he pow^erfully illustrated
from the actual facts of Indian ignorance, superstition, and
degradation. What, then, was to be done ? " If it be asked what
is the prime instrument in regenerating a fallen world, most
assuredly the answer must be — the ever-blessed Gospel, preached,
proclaimed, or taught by the living voice, and brought home to
the heart by the Spirit of God." "In this," he observed, "all
Christians are agreed"; but referring to the Eeport just read,
which spoke of Schools and Institutions, he added, " Here pious
minds sometimes demur." Then follows a splendid defence of
Education as a missionary agency. How could Englishmen, he
asked, be expected to go to India in sufficient numbers to reach
130 millions (as was then estimated) of Heathen? " Not unless,
by some catastrophe, we should be compelled to flee in thousands
from the land of our nativity, as the Jews fled from the city of
their fathers, or as seamen flee from a sinking ship." No, we
The object must look to native evangelists ; and to educate, lead to Christ,
tionai"'^^" ^^^ train for His service, those who might be so used was the
Missions, grand purpose of Missionary Education. " If any object to this,
let them begin at home : let them go forth with the destroying
scythe, to prove the sincerity of their principles, and mow down
their Christian Schools of every grade : let them toss their
Cambridge and Oxford into the depths of the sea ; and then,
smiling at the wreck and havoc they have made, declare that
we act inconsistently in desiring to erect Christian Schools on
the Ganges, as w^ell as on the banks of the Cam or of the Thames."
Then Duff enlarged on the intellect of India, which would be
satisfied somehow. " We have not to do there with vacuity of
mind . . . rather, with plenitude of mind." Therefore, let us
see to it that, loith the knowledge India would acquire, we gave
her also the knowledge of Jesus Christ and Him crucified ;
otherwise we should be training up ' ' versatile and learned
* Missionortj Reyintcr, 183G, p. 398.
IxDiA : Chances, Reforms, Developments
x\ I
infidels." Finally he appealed to his audience. First as to their ^J«j_[);
duty and responsihility, and then — Chap. 21.
" But why should I appeal to duty and responsibility alone ':'— why not ^^^.^
to the exquisite enioyinent experienced by those who kn«'W iin.l value fervent
the privik-e of beini fellow-w.rkers with the S'eat God Huuself ni appeal,
advancint,' that cause f..r which tlie world was ori.truially created, and tor
tlie devoloi)inent of wliich tlie worhl is still preserved in benig i
appeal to all present who bask in the sun.shine of the Redeemer s love,
whether the enjoynu-nt felt in proniotin- the great cause for which He
died in a.'onies oil the Cross, that He might see of the travail of His soul
and be satisfied, is not ineftable '1 Oh ! it is an enjoyment which those who
have once tasted it would not exchange for all the treasures of India
It is a ioy rich as heaven and ksting as eternity ; and, in the midst ot
troublous times, when the shaking of the nations and the heaving of
the earthquake which may ere long rend asunder the mightiest empires
have commenced, what stay -what refuge-what hi.hng-place can he
found like the faith and hope which are the stronghold of therigliteous.
Those whose faith has been tirmly placed on the rock of Jehovah s
i)iomi.ses can look across the surges of the tempestuous ocean to the
l)ri<dit regions which lie beyond. . . . Think of the earth as it now
is "rent with noise and burdened with a curse; think of the same
earth, in the radiance of Prophetic Vision, coiiverte.l into gladsome
bowers, the abodes of peace and righteousness. \ lew the Empire ot
Satan, at present fast bound by the iron chains of malignant demons,
who feed and riot on the groans and perdition of immortal spirits.
Behold, from the same dark empire, in the realization of proplietic
imagery, the new-clad mvriads rise, chaunting the chorus of a Renovatec
Creation -the jubilee of a once groaning but now Phnancipated L inverse .
. . . Oh, that the blessed era were greatly hastened! Oh, that the
vision of that mitred minstrel who erewhile sung so sweetly of • U|een-
land's icy mountains' and ' India's coral strand' were speedily realized.
— that glorious vision whereui, rapt into future tunes, he beheld the
stream of Gospel blessings rise, and gush, and roll onwanl till it
embraced every land and circled every shore-
Till like a sea of jrhny,
It si>rca(l from ])olc to pole.
" Even so. Lord Jesus I come (juickly : even so. Amen."
Duir sat down amid a tempest of applause. Bishop J. B.
Sumner, of Chester (after^yards Archliishop of Canterlniry), was
the next speaker. He rose, and paused long, waiting', as he
explained, " till the gush of emotion excited had been somewhat
assuaged." William Carus, then one of the deans of Trinity
College, Cambridge (who, a few months later, succeeded Simeon \^^^^^^
at Trinity Church), was present, and asked Duff to visit the
University ; and there the young Scotch missionary met Charles
Simeon, to wdiose blessed influence over his father's pastor his
own career in India was indirectly due. It was Simeon's last
link with the India for whicli he had done so much. Six months
later, he entered into rest.
CHAPTEK XXll,
TM'IA : rnOORESS OF TUK M]ssiOy>^.
The North India Stations— The Awakening in Krishnagar— Bishop
Wilson's Hopes -Why they failed -Bishop Wilson declines
Ladies — Mrs. Wilson -Bombay— Tinnevclly Rhcnius : his Work,
his Disconnexion — Progress under Pettitt — The Tinnevelly
Christians: Nominal Christianity; Persecution; C.M.S. and S.P.G.
— Travancore: Syrians and Heathen; Changed Policy of the Mis-
sion—Madras Seminary— Telugu Mission : Fox and Noble— John
Tucker — Controversies with the Corresponding Committees —
Bishop's College— Other Missions in India— Ceylon.
".4s he sowed, some fell h]/ the uatj side . . . and s,nne fell <,n stomj ijnjitnd
. . . and sotne fell a)iwng thorns . . . and other fell on good ground, and did
yield fnt it that s]>ran>j up and increased." — St. Mark iv. 4-8.
X our Fifteenth Chapter, we took a brief survey of
the Society's Missions in India when Bishop Heber
landed in 1823. Let us now view tliem again as
they appeared in 1841.* In the whole twenty-seven
years, 1814 to 1840 inclusive, the Society had coni-
niissioned exactly one hundred missionaries to work in India.
The word "sent out " would not be strictly accurate, as a few of
them were engaged in India. Fifty-six were labouring at the
close of 1840 ; and among these were* such men as Sandys, Long,
Weitbrecht, W. Smith, Leupolt, Pfander, Pettitt, Thomas, Bailey,
Baker, and Peet.
In North India there was distinct development although three
important cities in which some preliminary work had been done
by catechists and schoolmasters had not, owing to the paucity of
labourers, been regularly worked, and had dropped out of the list.
These were Delhi, Cawnpore, and Lucknow, The two former
have since become great centres of S.P.G. work ; and Lucknow,
after the Mutiny, was permanently occupied by the C.M.S. At
this time Oudh was still an independent kingdom ; but it had
been arranged for Abdul Masih to be stationed at the capital, and
after his ordination by Bishop Heber in December, 1825, he
proceeded accordingly to Lucknow. But he fell ill soon after his
arrival, and died on March 4th, 1827, after fourteen years' faithful
service as really the first C.M.S. missionary in India; "during
* But this chapter at ouo or two points, looks, for convenience, a little
beyond that date.
India : Progress of the Missions 313
the whole of which time," wrote the Calcutta Corresponding Com- Part IV.
mittee, "he had uniformly adorned the doctrine of God our ^P'^g
Saviour, and greatly endeared himself to many Christians of all ^P" " "
classes in society." Nine years elapsed before the second Native
clergyman in North India was ordained— Anund Masih, to w^hom
reference was made in Chapter XV.
Agra, the scene of most of Abdul Masih's labours, was now ^^^^'^j.^^"
occupied by four able Europeans, Germans from the Basle
Seminary, who had been expelled from the north-west of Persia
when the Russians conquered and annexed the province they
worked in. These were Schneider, Hoernle, Pfander, and Kreiss.
They had made their way to India without returning to Europe ;
and there they were gladly taken up by the Calcutta Correspond-
ing Committee. They remained in Lutheran orders for several
years, but ultimately they (except Kreiss, who died) were ordained
as clergymen of the Church of England by Bishop Cotton. In
addition to the ordinary work of preaching and teaching, the
missionaries had now the care of a large number of famine
orphans, thrown upon the Society's hands after the terrible
famine of 1837-8. For their accommodation, the Government ^^^"^^"1 ^^
gave the Society the tomb of Miriam Zamani (the traditional Secundra.
Christian wife of Akbar, the great Mogul Emperor), just opposite
Akbar's own grand mausoleum at Secundra, six miles from Agra.
The Secundra Orphanage w^as for some years w^orked by Hoernle,
w^ho also started a mission press, at which the orphan boys, as
they grew up, were employed.
At Benares, W. Smith and Leupolt were now in the full tide of fm'ifh^nd
the noble work which for forty years they carried on together, to Leupoit.
the admiration of all India. Smith was the itinerant preacher,
in the city and in the surrounding .country ; Leupolt was the
organizer of schools, orphanages (here also famine orphans were
taken charge of in 1837-8), industrial institutions. Under his
superintendence, the little Christian village at Sigra, a suburb
of Benares, became a happy centre of industry and good
influence.
A new Mission had been begun in 1824 at Gorakhpur, north- Gorakhpur,
west of Benares, near the frontier of Nepaul. It was, like so
many other Indian mission stations, started at the request, and at
the expense, of a Government oflicial. This w^as Mr. R. M. Bird,
the Commissioner of the district, w^ho, like other civil officers,
did all in his power for Missions while in India, and joined the
C.M.S. Committee when he returned to England. =■= His sister,
a weak and delicate lady, laboured most devotedly by his side
at Gorakhpur, teaching the women and girls, and translating books
and tracts into Urdu, until her death from cholera in 1834. Lord
William Bentinck took much interest in this Mission, and allotted
to it a large tract of waste land, to be cultivated by the Native
* See p. 297.
314 I.ynr.i: Pkocrf.ss of thf. Jf/.'ss/oxs
I'vRT IV. ("hristians, aiul upon it was built a villa-^a' for thoin to dwoll in,
(''l*"^^>-' "'^'"^''^ ^^•^^'^'^'■''•^'^•''. " Town of tliL'(!os|H'l." The first niissionaiy,
'' '■ "-• the Rev. M. Wilkinson, l)a]>tizecl sonic notal)U' converts, particularly
Sheikh Raji-ud-din, a ^^ohan)nledan of rank and influence, wiio,
after some years of consistent Christian life, died at a ^reat aj;e,
faithful to the last, thouf^h plied with i-very inducement to recant
on his death-hed.
fndwdt- ('<>nii"k' t»^ Lower Benj^'al, Timothy Sandys had hej^un the work
brecht. wliicli, for as len«,'thened a jx'riod as Smith and Leupolt at
Jienares, and with ecpial faithfulness, he carried on in the capital
of India. Weithrecht, another of the Basle men, hut trained
fin-ther at Isliuf^ton and in Enj^lisli orders, was at Burdwan with
his devoted wife, whose work in En^dand in her old aj^o is one of
the happiest memories of the present generation. But at the
period of this survey, the eyes of the Society restt-d with the
most caf^er interest and hope upon the I\rishna<,'ar or Nuddea
(more properly Nadiya) district, fifty miles north of ('alcutta. In
tiiis district there had just been reaped the lart,'est harvest of
converts yet gathered hy any Mission in North India.
In 1831, one of the German missionaries at Burdwan, W. J.
Deerr, visited Nadiya, a sacred Hindu town, and the hirlhplaco
of Chaitanya, tlie Vaishnava reformer of the sixteenth century.
Thence he crossed the river Ilooj^hly and made his way to another
Krishnr- important town, Krishna^ar, where he started a vernacular school.
^°''- This district is in the heart of Lower Bengal, and densely popu-
lated, there being at the last census more than two millions of
souls on an area of 3400 square miles, or 590 to the square mile.
Deerr came across some membei*s of a curious community called
Karta Bhoja, " Worshippers of the C'reator," one of the numeious
sects, half Hindu anil half Moslem, which have from time to time
risen up to protest against the tyranny of the Brahmans. In
1H33, thirty persons of this sect were baptized in the face of much
Movement persecution. The movement went on without much being said or
citril^^ thought about it, until 1838, when suddenly the leading men in
tianity. ten villages, including with their families some five hundred souls,
simultaneously eml)raced the Gospel of Christ, and, after some
months' instruction, were baptized. The Society at home heard
of it early in 1839 ; but the Committee only put a l)rief and
cautious paragraph in the Annual Report of that year. " A spirit
of inquiry," they said, " to a considerable extent, has lately been
manifested in the Krishnagar branch of the Burdwan Mission, of
a very hopeful kind. Time is necessary to ascertain its real
character. Experience has taught the Committee to rejoice with
trembling, even under the most satisfactory indications of a work
of grace among a Heathen population." That was all : not
another word. But shortly afterwards such accounts came from
the Bishop of Calcutta himself as filled all hearts with joyful
anticipation.
"One day," writes Daniel Wilson's biographer, "at the close
India: Progress of the Missions 315
of the year 1888, a Native of courteous address and fine bearing Part IY.
stood at the gate of the Bishop's pahxce, the bearer of a message 1824-41,
to him from the missionaries of Krislinagar, simihxr to the one ^'^^P- ^2.
spoken to St. Paul in vision, when the man of Macedonia stood by Appeal to
his bedside, saying. Come over and help us. It conveyed tidings ^^°\
of a great and general movement amongst the Natives towards
Christianity. Advice and help were urgently required." The
Bishop immediately commissioned Archdeacon Dealtry (who had
been appointed to that office when Corrie became Bishop of
Madras), and Krishna Mohun Banerjea, who was now a clergyman,
to go to Krishnagar and report. They found that the whole
population of fifty-five villages were desirous to become Christians.
The movement had been fostered by the unselfish kindness of
Mr. Deerr and his helpers when an inundation destroyed the crops,
and to that extent temporal motives were at work ; but the cjurus
of the sect themselves, who would be losers and not gainers
by becoming Christians, were also among the seeking crowd.
Dealtry and Banerjea, together with Sandys and Weitbrecht, who
had also hastened to the district, baptized at once five hundred
persons who had already been some time under instruction ; and
they returned to Calcutta to beg the Corresponding Committee
to send more missionaries and native catechists as quickly as
possible. Eight months later the Bishop went himself, accom-
panied by his chaplain, J. H. Pratt (son of Josiah Pratt) ; when
five hundred more candidates were baptized, and two hundred of
the former company confirmed. And at a second visit in March,
1840, nearly similar numbers were received. The adherents
numbered more than three thousand.
The Bishop addressed two long and deeply-interesting letters to Bishop
Lord Chichester, as President of the Society, detaihng the whole S^por"'^
story, and his own visit." It is not surprising that he viewed the
movement as the prelude to a much wider one, that would sweep
hundreds of thousands of souls into the Christian Church. Not
that he forgot the dangers of such a sudden accession of poor half-
taught cultivators. " The human heart," he wrote, " is deceitful :
appearances are treacherous. Popular movements of any kind
draw in numbers of ill-informed followers. The habits of heathen
society soon steal behind the Christian inquirer, and entangle him
in the old ambush. The result of real conversions, even at home,
and in our largest parishes, and where crowded congregations in
every quarter promise abundant fruit, is comparatively small —
what then are the allowances to be made for our feeble flocks in
Pagan India?" Still he did believe that the Holy Spirit was at
work ; and w^ho should set limits to the power of His grace ?
It is well known that the early promise of Krishnagar was not Krishna-
fulfilled ; and blame has often been cast upon the Bishop and the ^aradisap-
I ■> • ~> • -, -r^ ^ ,f pointment:
missionaries tor being deceived. But one cannot read the letters why?
* Printed in the Appendix to the Report of 1840.
31 6 Ixdia: Progress of r/fE Jf/ss/oxs
Part IV. ^vl•itten at the time \vithout noting the care and caution exercised,
1824r-41. jhg steadfastness of tiie converts \inder persecution, and many
'^P" other sif^iis of the reahty of the movement. If Krishnagar was
afterwards a disappointment — as no douht it was — are not other
reasons sufficient? Certainly there are three which amply account
for it. First, there were not Native teachers enough, and of good
quality enough, to go in at once and lead the converted on
to a higher life. Secondly, it is clear that the German mission-
aries who took charge, such as Deerr, Kruckeherg, Lincke,
Blumhardt, &c. — there were ten in the district in 1848 — had not
learned the importance of teaching the Native Church its first
lessons in self-support, self-administration, and self-extension.
Not that they are to be l)lamed for this more than others.
Scarcely any one at that time, at home or abroad, had really
grasped that gi*eat principle ; and in North India especially, the
patriarchal system that suited the genius of the German brethren,
making each missionary the ma-bap (mother and father) of his
people, was, kind as it seemed, a real obstacle to the healthy
independent growth of the Church. Then thirdly, when the
Society at home, inspired by Henry Vemi, adopted the priiicii)le
just indicated as its definite policy, the missionaries were with-
drawn (or vacancies not supplied) too quickly ; and the community
that might in its infancy have been taught to walk alone, when
suddenly let go, stumbled and fell. How it was again revived in
later years, we shall see hereafter.
One request of Bishop Wilson for Krishnagar reminds us of
another department of work in Bengal. lie appealed for money
to provide instruction for the women and girls. B\it in what way '?
By taking them into the households of married missionaries, and
clothing and feeding them. Unmairied lady missionaries were
not then thought of. If they had been, and if they could have
l)een provided, would not such an agency have been at least one
preservative against declension in the Krishnagar Mission? But
the Bishop was not prepared to welcome tliem at all. Archdeacon
C. J. Hoare wrote to him from England about a lady who wished
to go out and work in India. "No," replied the Bishop, "the
lady will not do. I object on principle, and from the experience
of Indian life, to single ladies coming out to so distant a place,
with the almost certainty of their marrying within a month of
their arrival. . . . I imagine the beloved Persis, and Tryphena and
Tryphosa, remained in their own neighbourhoods and families." '•'
It will be observed that he conveniently omits Phebe of Cenchrea,
who certainly did not stay at home ! And ladies did go to India
even then in the name of the Lord, and did not get married at
once, but did work at some few of the stations of both C.M.S.
and other societies. These were sent out by a new organization
founded in 1834, which afterwards adopted the title of the Society
* Life of Bishop D. Wilson, vol. ii. p. 255.
India: Progress of the Missions 317
for Promoting Female Educcation in the East — a society whose Part IV.
agents have done noble work, not only in India, but in other parts i,^*^'^'"^-,^.;
of Asia, both West and East. ^^^' "'
There was a Ladies' Female Education Society in Calcutta
before this, founded in 1824, which, with the assistance of a grant
of £500 from the C.M.S., had established a Central School, with
Mrs. Wilson (whose original girls' school when she was Miss
Cooke was noticed in our Fifteenth Chapter) at the head of it.
The coming of these ladies released Mrs. Wilson from the
Central School, and enabled her to carry out the desire of her
heart by establishing a Female Orphanage. This she did at Mrs. wii-
Agarpara, a few miles north of Calcutta, in 1836. Bishop Wilson, Agarpara.
after a visit to her there, wrote of her, "This holy woman, and
' widow indeed,' with a spiritual, sweet, consistent carriage —
Henry Martyn or Corrie in female form — meek, silent, patient,
laljorious, with extraordinary tact for her peculiar work — is
carrying on the greatest undertaking yet witnessed in India." '•'
For six years she continued this blessed work, and then, to the
Bishop's dismay and grief, she joined the Plymouth Brethren,
who had spread even then to India. She had ceased to be
connected with the Church Missionary Society at her husband's
death in 1828 ; and the Bishop thought that her isolated position
had made her more open to the persuasions of the new-comers.
She had indeed asked the Society to occupy Agarpara as one
of its stations, but the paucity of men had led the Committee
to decline; which, the Bishop thought, "was the spark that
fired the- train." f When, however, she openly seceded from
the Church, he persuaded her to transfer her institution to the
Society, and then Agarpara became a C.M.S. station.
Crossing India now to the Bombay Presidency, we find some Bombay :
little development, though the work was still on a very small valentine.'^
scale. The two principal missionaries, during our present period
wereC. P. Farrar and J. Dixon, both Islington men. The former
w^as the father of F. W. Farrar, afterwards successively Head
Master of Marlborough, Canon and Archdeacon of Westminster,
and Dean of Canterbury. A new" station had been opened in 1832
at Nasik, an important centre of Brahman influence in the Deccan
— indeed the Benares of Western India. At Bombay a High Money
School, established in memory of a godly and much-respected School,
civilian, Eobert Money, had been put under the Society's charge,
and a scholar of Trinity College, Cambridge, G. M. Valentine,
had come out as its Principal. A remarkable Parsee convert had
been one fruit of his work in the School, who afterwards became
well known as the Eev. Sorabji Kharsedji. The Society viewed
with great satisfaction the appointment of Archdeacon Carr, who
had long been its correspondent, to be the first Bishop of Bombay.
* Missionary Eegister, 1838, p. 828.
•j* Life of Bishop Wilson, vol. ii. p. 187.
2iS India: Progress of the Missions
Part IV. Passing on to the South, we find that the ten or twelve years
}^^~^}.j prior to the establishment of the Bishopric of Madras had been a
^^' "' time of great progress in Tinnevelly. Ehenius proved himself a
South most devoted and untiring missionary. Year by year the converts
Progl-essin increased in number. The people who put themselves under
Tinnevelly instruction, indeed, were far more numerous than could be
Rhen'ius. Satisfactorily dealt with. Many native catechists and teachers
were employed, but they needed more instruction themselves,
and more supervision than the three or four missionaries in the
province could give them. It was really a good thing that the
opposition of the Heathen was incessant, and that persecution
ever and anon broke out. This constantly weeded the catechumens,
those who were double-minded or half-hearted falling back ;
while the baptized Christians, not having been admitted to the
Church till they had been well tested, for the most part remained
steadfast. The pastoral care of the Christians, scattered as they
were over the country in more than two hundred towns and
villages, was a heavy burden upon the missionaries ; but in 1830
an important step was taken towards the development of an
indigenous Native Church by the ordination of the first Tamil
Rev. John pastor, Jolin Devasagayam. He had been for some years working
^z^txn ^^ ^"^ Inspecting Schoolmaster in the Tranquebar district, of
which the Society was for a time in charge when the old Danish
Mission had come to an end ; and he had emphatically earned for
himself a good degree. It was Bishop Turner, the fourth Bishop
of Calcutta, who, while on a visit to Madras, had the privilege
of ordaining the first Native clergyman in South India.
Devasagayam, on his ordination, was sent to Tinnevelly, and
there, in 1836, he received priest's orders from Bishop Corrie, in
Trinity Church, Palamcotta. This church, opened in June, 1826,
was the first of several substantial churches, with towei's or
spires, that were erected in the province, and became the
outward and visible sign of the growth of Christianity. Many
services of deep interest have been held in it in the past seventy
years.
Ehenius founded several useful societies among the people,
especially the Dliarma Sangam, or Native Philanthropic Society,
for the purchase of land and houses as a refuge for converts who
Christian wcrc persecuted. Several Christian villages sprang up under the
villages. auspices of this organization, such as Kadachapuram (Grace
Village), Suviseshapuram (Gospel Village), and Nallur (Good
Town). There were also a Poor Fund, a Widows' Fund, and
Tract and Bible Societies. In connexion with these last, Ehenius
did excellent translational and literary work.
The old ^*^^' some ycars Ehenius also supervised the congregations
s.p.c.K. belonging to the old S.P.C.K. Mission, comprising in 1825 about
issions. ^200 Christians. Catechists for the old stations and districts were
supplied from Tanjore and Trichinopoly ; but the four or five
Germans at those centres were unable to spare from among them-
India: Progress of the Missions 319
selves a resident missionary for Tinnevelly.-'' Bishop Heber, Part IV.
indeed, much desired men in Enghsh orders for Tanjore and the l^^-i-il-
other older Missions. In writing to the S.P.C.K., while acknow- *^h^^22.
ledging the excellence of old Kohlhoff and others, he *' trusted he
was not illiberal in expressing a hope that the Venerable Society
would supply him with episcopally-ordained clergymen." Un-
fortunately none were forthcoming; nor was the S.P.G., when it s.p.g.
took over the administration from the S.P.C.K. in 1825, able to do caidweii
more. Not till 1829 could one be spared, Mr. Eosen, and he only
stayed a few months. At last, in 1836, the S.P.G. was able to
send an English missionary to its districts in Tinnevelly, the
Eev. C. Hubbard, together with two Germans in English orders.
In 1841 came the Rev. R. Caldwell, who became one of the
greatest of Indian missionaries, and facile ijrinceps among Tamil
scholars. Shortly after this, the districts of the two societies were
carefully marked out. Hitherto the congregations had been much
mtermingled ; and though this had promoted the unity of the
Church, and facilitated the supervision of all alike in Ehenius's
time, it was found awkward for native catechists and school-
masters in the same group of villages to be in different connexions
and looking to different superiors. The able compiler of the
S.P.G. Digest thus sums up what was done : — " Notwithstanding
the difficulties involved — such as exchanges of schools, congrega-
tions, and lay agents — a division of districts was effected in a
spirit worthy of the common cause. As a consequence of the
long neglect of the earlier Mission, the C.M.S. has obtained
possession of the greater part of the Tinnevelly field, the S.P.G.
operations being confined to the south-east of the province." i
In reading the old C.M.S. Reports at the time of the rapid views of
development of the Native Christian community under Rhenius, r'^mitt
one is struck with the extreme caution and candour of the Com- on Tinne-
mittee. They knew well how ready friends at home are to over- gres^s.^™'
estimate the results of Missions, and to imagine or expect
perfection in native converts ; and year after year, while thank-
fully reporting the progress effected through the goodness and
grace of God, they carefully set forth the unfavourable side, willing
rather to run the risk of putting weapons into the hands of unfair
and unscrupulous opponents — which proved to be the case — than
to ignore or conceal facts. Nay, they not only did this ; they also,
even when a specially favourable report came, warned"^ their
* " Noiinnally the Mission was under the Tanjore Missionaries, but tlie only
real superintendence continued to be supplied hy the agents of the C.M.S.,
until 1829." — S.P.G. Digest, p. 533. The Calcutta Diocesan Committee of the
S.P.C.K., at the time of the transfer to S.P.G., referred to the Tinnevelly
Christians as having- Jjeen "kindly taken up by . . . the Church Missionary
Society : thus verifying, in a double sense, the text that saith, ' One soweth
and another reapeth.' . . . [The] Committee rejoice, for their object is equally
attained, that these Gentiles were not suffered to remain in their idolatry,
and that this timely assistance has been afforded by a Sister Society." CM S
Report, 1828, p. 9(3. f Digest, j,. 534.
320 India : Progress of the Missions
Part IV. readers against thinking too much of it. In one Eeport they call
1824-41. on them " to rejoice in what the Lord had done, hut with trembling,
Chap. 22. ^^^^ ^^ l^g much in prayer for the as yet tender flocks, that He who
breaks not the bruised reed may strengthen, invigorate, and con-
firm the work of grace." Again, " The Committee would guard
their statements from being misunderstood, as if they represented
a state of advancement and purity beyond the truth of the case.
The description of a change from a state of Heathenism to that of
a profession of Christianity is always liable to such misrepresenta-
tions by superficial readers." And again, after quoting some
instances of exemplary Christian conduct in the Christians, they
said, " Let us not be mistaken, as if these instances were produced
as samples of the general state of Native Christians. Far other-
wise : they are given only as special instances of divine grace,
which prove that the work is of the Lord " — for, it is justly added,
" Men do not gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles."
Difficulties In 1835, a grave crisis occurred in Tinnevelly. Three or four
^u^ • vears before this, Ehenius had proposed that he and the other
Knenius. J •ii-i it -\ • f jjitj^i
Germans with hmi should ordam, accordmg to the Lutheran use,
four or five of the chief native catechists, and so make them
" country priests " like those of the S. P. C.K. Missions. To this
j)roposal the Society replied that the S.P.C.K. " country priests "
had received Lutheran orders at a time when there was no
English bishop in India ; but that as English orders were now
procurable, a Church society could seek no others for ncio
candidates, though it gladly still recognized Ehenius's own orders
just as the S.P.G. still recognized Kohlhoff's. Much correspon-
dence ensued ; and at length Ehenius proposed either (1) to give
up his Tinnevelly post and engage only in translational work, or
(2) to join another society, or (3) to go to England and confer with
the Committee. The Committee chose the third alternative ; but
in the meanwhile Mr. Anthony Groves, the w^ell-known and very
devoted Plymouth Brother,-'' had visited Tinnevelly, and so
influenced Ehenius that, instead of going to England, he issued
two pamphlets attacking the Prayer Book and the whole con-
stitution of the Church of England, and sent them all over South
India. The Committee received these pamphlets with "deepest
regret and distress," and while expressing their " strong sense of
his piety, zeal, devotedness, and unwearied labours," yet felt
Rhenius " bound in consistency, as attached members of the Church of
discon- England," to dissolve connexion with him.
Ehenius thereupon, in what appeared an excellent spirit, handed
over the charge of the Mission to the Eev. George Pettitt, who
was- sent to Tinnevelly by the Madras Committee, and left the
district ; but the difficulties of the position were much enhanced
when the other three German brethren, Schaffter, Midler, and
Lechler, elected to secede with him, leaving only John Devasa-
* See p. 283.
India: Progress of the AIissions 321
gayam clinging to the Church. Naturally there was much giief, Part IV.
and not a little discontent, among the Native Christians; but all 1824-41.
seemed to be quieting down, when a leading catechist, who was ^'^^P- 2^-
discovered misappropriating funds, resigned, and at once set to
work to incite the people to invite Mr. Ehenius and the others
back. Unhappily, encouraged by English friends at Madras who
resented the Society's assertion of its Church principles, they
thereupon returned ; and a great and distressing schism ensued. Distress-
For three years the Committee had to report on Tinnevelly in '"g schism,
terms expressive of deep sorrow ; for although three-fourths of
the converts remained staunch, the district was now filled with
" envying and strife, confusion and every evil work." Good
Bishop Corrie w^ent down to Tinnevelly, and endeavoured to make
peace, but in vain ; but his venerable and gracious presence made
a deep impression on the faithful members of the Church, and it
w^as on this occasion that Devasagayam received priest's orders
- — the first of many ordinations held at Palamcotta.
In June, 1838, however, Ehenius died, lamented, for his zeal Death of
and earnestness, by all parties. The Society at once approached ^^emus.
his widow with a proposal that she and her family should be
treated just as they would have been if Ehenius had been on the
roll at the time of his death. The good feeling thus established
was signally manifested when the eldest son offered his services as
a missionary, came to England to be trained at Islington, and
ultimately returned to Tinnevelly as a member of the C.M.S.
staff. In the meanwhile, the singular patience and gentleness
which Mr. Pettitt, in his most trying position, had manifested
during the three years, had borne speedy fruit. Most of the
Christians who had seceded came back to the Church, with
Schaffter at their head. Lechler joined the London Missionary
Society in another part of South India. Miiller proposed to the
L.M.S. to receive him and his peojjle where they were, thus
extending into Tinnevelly the Tamil Mission which that society
was carrying on upon the other side of the mountains, in South
Travancore. The L.M.S. Directors, however, loyal, as ever, to
the great principle of missionary comity, declined to encroach The
upon Church of England ground ; and ultimately Miiller also, heailT.
and the remaining seceders, rejoined the Church and the C.M.S.
All traces of the schism now quickly disappeared. "Then,"
wrote Pettitt afterwards, quoting the Acts, "had the Churches
rest, and were edified, and walking in the fear of the Lord, and in Further
the comfort of the Holy Ghost, were multiplied." In 1841, Bishop p^"^'-^^^-
Spencer visited the Mission, and held the first confirmations in
the district, laying hands on some fifteen hundred candidates.
Just before the crisis of 1835, the Christian adherents, including
catechumens, numbered about 10,000 ; now, after six years, they
numbered 20,000 ; after another six years, 30,000. This total,
however, continually varied as persecution raged and waned ; but
the number of baptized Christians rose steadily year by year, fronj
VOL. I. Y
3'
India: Progress of the Missions
Part IV.
1824-il.
Chap. 22.
Pettitt on
the acces-
sions in
Tinnevelly.
How treat
inquirers
with mixed
motives ?
about 3000 in 1835 to 6000 in 1841, and 12,000 in 1848. Among
these there were a good many Vellalars and Maravars, highly
respectable and respected divisions of the Sudra caste, and there-
fore ranking high in South India. At the other end of the scale
there were Pariah congregations. But the bulk of the converts
were from the Shanar caste, the palmyra-climbers of the province,*
though many, having become fairly well off, merely owned the
trees and let them out to their poorer brethren. Thg Shanars,
and some other Tamil castes, are counted as Hindus, but really
are devil-worshippers ; and the religion of Tinnevelly is a com-
bination of that strange and degrading system — if system it can be
called — and the more elaborate Brahmanism.
In his interesting book on the Tinnevelly Mission, | Mr. Pettitt
discusses the causes of the considerable accessions to Christianity
in this province. He explains that temporal motives had large
influence, but believes that these motives were used by the Holy
Spirit to lead on to true conversion of heart in many cases. " The
temporal condition of our people," he writes, " has been decidedly
improved, not by any pecuniary advantages received from the
Mission, jor there are none, but from Christian knowledge,
education, deliverance from spiritual slavery, protection, and the
cultivation of industrious habits." " Is it to be wondered at," he
asks, " if many have derived, from seeing the advantage of con-
necting themselves with a vmited and protected body like this, an
impulse which their faint perceptions of the truth of Christianity
would not of itself produce ? " He further explains that by " pro-
tection " he means that the lower castes, by joining a homogeneous
body, found remedy and redress against the oppression of the
higher castes, particularly through having men of some education
and influence, as the leading catechists were, both to advise them
and to get justice done them. Mr. Pettitt also discusses the ques-
tion. How far is a missionary justified in receiving persons w^hom
he knows or suspects of being impelled by earthly motives to come
to him ? Certainly, he replies, he must never set before the
Heathen " the promise of the life that now is " as a reason why he
should come to Christ. But, he asks, if a Heathen, merely seeing
that Christianity is a system of justice and peace, comes forward
as an inquirer, is he to repel or refuse him ? Is he not rather to
receive him and instruct him and show him what Christianity
really is ? "It may be," he goes on, " that in the Gospel net w^e
enclose both good and bad ; but the sorting process soon takes
place. Some we decline at once ; some are cast off for open sin,
* The sandy plains of Tinnevelly are covered with groves of palmyra- trees.
This tree constitutes an important part of the wealth of the district. A
Shanar climbs thirty or forty trees, to a height of sixty or eighty feet, twice
daily, to collect the sap, which in one form is the staple food of the people,
and in another gives consistency to their mortar for building. The trunk,
the roots, the tibres, the leaves, of the tree are also used in various ways.
■f- i/(e Tinnevdlxj Ui»»ion of the C.M.S. London, iSJl.
IxDiA : Progress of the Missions
323
or irregular attendance, or relapses into heathenish acts ; others Part IV.
are driven away by persecution, or withdraw from dislike of the i«2+-4i.
restraints and requirements of the Gospel. Many, however, are ^^'^P- 22.
retained, and after long and careful instruction are admitted l)v
baptism into the Christian Church " — and he felicitously illustrates
the difference between these " adherents " in the early stages of
their adhesion and the surrounding Heathen by comparing the
former to land just enclosed for cultivation, and the latter to the
waste land outside the fence. His further account in detail of the
methods adopted for the " shepherding " and " feeding " — to vary
the figure— of these still " silly sheep " is exceedingly instructive,
but must not detain us here.
It will be borne in mind that these remarks do not apply to the
converts from the higher castes. Their case was quite different.
" What things were gain " to them they had to " count loss for
Christ." Of the reality of their convictions there could rarely be
any doubt. Even the Shanars and the lower castes or out-castes Persecu-
frequently had to endure grievous persecution. Crops were often *'°" °*"*''^
destroyed, cattle maimed or stolen, houses and huts pulled down, ''°"'"'''*^"
and the people themselves maltreated. False accusations, backed
by the unblushing perjury which is so common in India, were
brought against them in the local courts ; and the local judges,
who were generally Brahmans, were naturally prejudiced agafnst
them, and not always fair in theii- decisions. The Heathen of
the lower castes, indeed, often suffered oppression of this kind ;
but the Christians, in addition, were persecuted for their neglect
of idol feasts and other observances. An association was formed
called the Vibiithi Sangam, or Sacred Ashes Society, in allusion
to the heathen marks on the forehead or breast or arms, denotin^^
allegiance to this or that god, that are made with the ashes 0I
sandal-wood; and this society took the leading part in the
persecution. One great cause of offence was a family, or small
village community, transforming its little devil-temple into a
Christian prayer-house — which was frequently done ; and the
transformed huts were often pulled down in the night. In one
gross case Mr. Pettitt appealed to the magistrate at Palamcotta.
TIk" members of the Sacred Ashes Society who had destroyed the
prayer-house pleaded that no such building had existed. The
magistrate despatched a police-officer to see the place and report.
The Heathen party instantly sent men to run all night and reach
the village first, thirty miles off.=- When the policeman arrived,
he was shown a bit of ploughed land, with grain growing. A
Christian bystander, however, quietly said, " Please, sir, take up
one or two of those blades of grain' by the roots." The ground
had been ploughed, watered, and planted in the night, to remove
all traces of the ruined building !
* There is nothing unusual in this. When I was at Palamcotta, a man
brought nic a letter from Mcngnauapuram, twenty-ei<iht miles olf, which he
luiil run all niglit to deliver early in the morning. — 'E S
Y 2
324 India : Progress of the Missions
Tart IV. One case, in 1846 (to go forward a little), was carried to the
Gh^^2 ^^^B'^®^^ court in Madras. As usual, the anti-missionary party
^^" ■ among the Europeans warmly espoused the cause of the
Anglo- persecutors ; but a prolonged trial resulted in the disgrace and
attt'ckthe dismissal of the local Brahman judges. On this occasion the
Mission. C.M.S. and S.P.G. missionaries united in a public statement, to
SPG and counteract the evil influence of certain Madras newspapers. This
c'.M.s. masterly document, while refuting the calumnies that had been
bine to "^" cii'culated, fearlessly avowed that such calumnies were only what
defend it. was to be expected whenever success was vouchsafed to
missionary labours. The very same critics who at one time
would taunt the missionaries with their lack of results would,
when results were achieved, complain of the inevitable consequent
disturbance of the Heathen mind. " Our success, however,"
said the missionaries, with admirable point, "is no fault: we
labour with the view of succeeding, and if our labours are
tolerated at all, any measure of success w^hich may follow must
be tolerated also. Hindus must either be prevented from
embracing Christianity, or protected in the profession of it."
The signatures to this document show what excellent men there
now were in the Tinnevelly Mission. Among the four S.P.G. names
are Caldwell and Pope.='= Among the fourteen C.M.S. names are
Pettitt, Sargent, Thomas, J. T. Tucker, and the brothers Hobbs.
The great work of Tucker, Thomas, and Sargent will come before
us hereafcar. The leading missionaries of the two societies had
at this time been unitedly engaged in making a new translation of
the Prayer-book. "We had met," writes Pettitt, "nearly every
month for three years : our intercourse had been delightful and
profitable ; and we were all sorry that the meetings were now to
cease. Indeed the regret was so sincere and deep that we
resolved in future to meet together twice a year for mutual
intercourse, and for the consideration of matters connected with
our common work ; and the Eev. E. Caldwell was appointed
secretary to see this arrangement carried into effect."!
Another labourer at this time was Miss C. C. Giberne, who had
been in Ceylon as an agent of the Female Education Society, but
in 1844 joined the C.M.S., and began, on a small scale, the work
.among girls and women which in later years has been carried ou
with such signal blessing by the ladies of the Church of England
Zenana Society. Yet another labourer was a highly-esteemed
Mn ^ bhnd Eurasian, W. Cruickshanks, who in 1844 opened what
shanks. became the Palamcotta High School. Under him this School
produced important converts, some of whom became catechists
and clergymen ; notably W. T. Satthianadhan, afterwards the
honoured pastor of Zion Church, Madras.
Turning now westward, and crossing the Ghauts, we come to
* Dr. G. U. Pope, now so well known at Oxford, is the sole survivor,
t Pettitt's Tinnevelly Mission, p. 453.
India: Progress of the Missions 325
Travancore. The commencement of this Mission was related in Part IV.
the chapter on Efforts to Eevive the Eastern Chm^ches, as for ^J;™
its first twenty years it was entirely confined to an honest and '
patient endeavour to arouse the ancient Syrian Church to self- Tra^van-
reformation. So particular were the missionaries not to endanger ly^ln ^
the success of the mission they were sent to fulfil by any action church,
that could offend the most sensitive ecclesiastical propriety, that,
when Archdeacon Robinson of Madras paid them a visit in 1830,
they asked his counsel about building a small chapel for occa-
sional worship according to Anglican use. For fourteen years they
had worked on without that privilege, worshipping always in the
Syrian churches, despite much in the ritual w^hich they dishked.
Now, although they had not in any systematic way preached to
the Heathen, they had a few converts from Heathenism, and they
shrank from subjecting these to the teaching of the ignorant and
immoral Syrian ]3riests. The now hostile Metran, not satisfied
wdth the better-educated priests produced by the Syrian College
which the missionaries were still carrying on, had ordained lads
of tw^elve and fourteen years of age to the diaconate, hterally
tempted thereto by the ordination fee ! and he encouraged both
priests and deacons in every superstitious usage, especially in
masses for the dead, these being a profitable source of revenue.
Altogether, there was less evidence than ever of any desire after
reform and the purifying of the Church.
In 1835, Bishop Wilson visited Travancore, and, showing the Bishop
utmost sympathy for so venerable a Christian community, bent ^^avan-'"
all his energies to influence the Metran and other leaders. He core,
preached by invitation in the principal Syrian church at Cottayam
before an immense concourse of people. The service was very
elaborate : forty priests and deacons appeared in gorgeous
vestments, and mass was performed, with a loud shout of joy at
the end from the whole congregation, and the "kiss of peace"
given all round from one to the other. The Bishop preached on
the Epistle to the Church of Philadelphia— a generously-chosen
subject, when undoubtedly Ephesus or Thyatira or Sardis w^ould
have better represented the actual state of the Church of Malabar.
" I dw^elt," he wrote, " on what the Spirit saith, first as respects
Christ who addressed the Church; secondly, as respects the
Church itself ; thirdly, as to the promise made to it. On this last
head I showed them that Christ had set before them an open door
by the protection and friendship of the English Church and people.
In application I called on each one to keep Christ's word, and not
deny His name, as to their own salvation.'"'^ "We wish," he
exclaimed at another gathering, "that the Syrian Church should
shine as a bright star in the right hand of the Son of Man, holding
forth the faithful word."
But it w^as all in vain. In the very next year, the Metran
* Life of Bishop D. Wilsmi, vol. ii. p. 63.
326 India: Progress of the Missions
convened a Synod, at which it was iinally resolved to reject all the
suggestions that had been made by the English Bishop, and to
put an end then and there to the influence of the English
missionaries in the Syrian Church. They accordingly retired
from the College, and with sorrow abandoned an enterprise thai3
liad been faithfully and with much self-denial prosecuted for
twenty years.'''
Now, however, they were free ; and they turned to the
Heathen. Bailey continued his translations into Malayalam of
the Bible and Prayer-book, and his printing-press, and built a
large church for Anglican services at Cottayam — " Mr. Bailey's
fine, noble church, the glory of Travancore," wrote Bishop Wilson
on his second visit ; Baker extended his evangelistic work and
vernacular village schools in the central districts of Cottayam and
Pallam ; two younger men of great energy and zeal, Joseph Peet
and John Hawksworth, set to work among the Heathen in the
Mavelicara and Tiruwella districts to the south ; and another new
man, H. Harley, opened a Mission at Trichur, in the kingdom of
Cochin, to the north. Of all these labours we shall hear more
hereafter. But meanwhile, there were devout and pure-minded
men among the Syrians who deplored the loss of so much holy
influence in their Church, and these could not be entirely deserted.
A large part of the old endowment of the Syrian College raised by
Colonel Munro being awarded to the Mission by a Court of
Arbitration, a new College on the lines of the English Church was
established at Cottayam, and the money so awarded applied to
the education of Syrian youths. The Eev. John Chapman, Fellow
of St. John's College, Cambridge, was sent out to take charge of
this new College, and for ten years did splendid service. The
result of its influence, and of the pattern of simpler worship and
purer life now set by the liberated Mission, was a spontaneous
reforming movement within the Syrian Church, which in later
years has proved a great blessing. And although, from the first,
proselytism was anxiously avoided, many Syrians, sick of the
corruptions and superstitions of their own community, openly
joined the Church of England ; and several of those trained in the
College were ultimately ordained to be pastors of the Native
Cl^urch gradually being built up out of Heathendom.
Madras The need of a superior Theological Seminary for South India
logical wa^.^more and more felt as the Tinnevelly Mission developed and
Seminary, the Travaucore Mission got on to right lines ; a Seminary to
which the best educated of the catechists could be sent, for an
English divinity course. In 1838, the Eev. Joseph Henry Gray,
* Canon Bateman says, "One unworthy clergyman, a chaplain of the Com-
pany, had travelled through the country telling the people that crucifixes and
prayers for thv3 dead, and all the superstitions learned from Rome, were right,
and that the missionaries and doctrines were all wrong" {liije. of Bishop
D. Wilson, vol. ii. p. 223). "This," adds Whitehouse, "was not t lie only case
of the kind " {Lingering s of Light in a Darh Land, p. 264:).
Ixdia: Progress of tiii-: Missions 327
who had j^ained high honours at Trinity College, Dublin, was sent Part IY.
to Madras to set such an institution on foot. It proved con- Jj^^^^l,'
spicuously successful. From among its alumni came some of the _1_" '
ablest of the Tamil and Malayalam clergy and chief catechists,
such as George Matthan, of Travancore, who translated Butler's
Analogy into Malayalam; Devasagayam Gnanamuttu and Jesudasen
John, of Tinneveliy, the latter the son of old John Devasagayam ;
Joseph CorneHus and W. T. Satthianadhan, also of Tinneveliy.
Subsequently this Seminary was superseded for some years by
other institutions estabhshed in the two Missions themselves ; and
only in comparatively recent years has it been revived in the
present Madras Divinity School.
Towards the end of our period, the Society's attention was The^ ^^
drawn to an important section of the population of South India people :
which, so far, had been almost entirely neglected. North of
Madras for five hundred miles, and inland for some three hundred
miles, stretches a country inhabited by the Telugu-speaking
people, '■• numbering at that time about ten millions.! In 1805, in
the very midst of the "Dark Period," the London Missionary
Society had sent two men to Vizagapatam, on the coast ; but they
and their successors were mainly occupied in translational and
educational work, and for thirty years had no convert. In 1822,
the same Society had occupied Cuddapah, an important inland
centre ; but there also progress had been slow. In 1835, the
American Baptist Missionary Union had begun a Mission in the
Nellore district, wdiich in later years has become famous. All the
other Missions in the Telugu country, S.P.G., American and
German Lutherans, and Canadian Baptists, are of later date.
At various posts in this territory there were, at the period of
Queen Victoria's Accession, a little band of godly Christian
Enghshmen, in the civil and military services, who encouraged
one another in good works. One of them, Mr. John Goldingham,|
in 1838, addressed an earnest letter to the C.M.S. Corresponding Appeal to^
Committee at Madras, pleading the cause of the Telugu people, their'be °"
and proposing to raise a fund to start a Church of England half.
Mission among them. This letter may be regarded as an answer
to the prayers of good Bishop Corrie, who on his death-bed had
laid their case before the Lord. The Madras Committee sent on
the letter to England ; but the Home Committee, though receiv-
ing it w^ith "the most lively interest," were constrained, in view
of the financial position of the Society, to decHne, " though with
most painful feelings," undertaking the Mission. Thereupon some
leading members who were connected with South India, among
them Mr. Hough, the former Tinneveliy chaplain, Mr. Joseph
Fenn, the former Travancore missionary, and Mr. J. M. Strachan,
* " Telngii" is not a geographical but a liiigiiistic name.
t Now twenty millions.
X Twenty years later, Mr. Goldingham became a member of the Committee
at home.
3-^ India: Progress of rhe Missions
Part IV. the former Madras treasurer, resolved to try and organize a Mission
r?^2 *^®°^s®^^®s. The appeal, by a remarkable providence, came,
Chap. 22. nearly at the same time, into the hands of two yomig men,
graduates respectively of Oxford and Cambridge, who were
unknown to each other ; and they responded to it, separately and
independently, with oflers of personal service. Meanwhile a fund of
nearly £2000 had been raised by Mr. Goldingham and liis friends
in India ; and both men and means being thus provided, the
C.M.S. Committee at length consented to undertake the enterprise.
The two men proved to be two of the most devoted and
honoured missionaries whose names appear on the Society's roll,
Nobfe"^ I^obert Turlington Noble and Henry Watson Fox. Of them person-
ally a future chapter will speak. On March 8th, 1841, they sailed for
India, and proceeded toMasulipatam, the chief seaport on the coast
of the Telugu country. It was arranged from the first that they
divl'rse should work in quite different ways. Noble was to open a school
work. on the hues of Duff's College at Calcutta. Fox was to be an
itinerant preaching missionary. With unusual self-denial, how-
ever, they attempted nothing for two years, but gave themselves
wholly to the study of the language. At length, on November 21st,
1843, the English School, as it was called, was opened by Noble,
in conjunction with an excellent Eurasian, J. E. Sharkey, to
whom the Telugu language was a vernacular. The fruits it
gathered will appear hereafter. Fox's health was weak from the
first, and his period of actual evangelistic work was brief ; but he
laid the foundations of the Village Mission which in later years has
gathered thousands of souls into the Visible Church.
Tu^cker Another very important development in South India during
at Madras, the period now under review was the appointment of the Eev.
John Tucker as Secretary at Madras. Mr. Tucker was a Fellow
of Corpus, Oxford, as far back as 1817, and was an intimate
friend of Thomas Arnold and John Keble.^= He had had some
years' ministerial experience, and he proved one of the best gifts
God ever gave to the Church Missionary Society. He went out
in 1833, and for fourteen years (with a short interval) he exercised
an influence which has never been surpassed. It was he who
advised Pettitt throughout the difficulties with Ehenius ; it was
he who directed the changes in the Travancore Mission ; it was
he who organized the new Telugu Mission. But above all, his
influence_ over the English in Madras was unique. The cream
of the civil and military circles crowded to his ministry, and
he was privileged to lead to Christ, and to confirm in the
faith, high officers in both services who became from that
time the staunch friends of the missionary cause; several of
whom in after years were prominent men in the C.M.S.
Committee-room in Salisbury Square— as Tucker himself did
for a short time as Secretary. It is a grievous pity that there
* " The single-hearted and devout." Lock's Life of Keble, p. 5,
India : Progress of the Missions 329
is no memoir of John Tucker ; but he left such a positive Part IV.
prohibition against it that not even an obituary notice could iP'^g'
appear in the Society's publications. His sister became well ^^'
known by her excellent little books on Missions, The Bainhow
in the North (Eupert's Land), The Southern Cross and Southern
Croivn (New Zealand), and Sunrise Within the Tropics (Abeo-
kuta) ; and in her memory was founded the Sarah Tucker
Institution at Palamcotta.
Mr. Tucker's name introduces an important subject, the ad-
ministration of the Society's Missions in India. In a previous
chapter * reference was made to the Corresponding Committees The Corre-
formed in earlier days by Evangelical chaplains like David Brown lom-'^'"^
at Calcutta and Marmaduke Thompson at Madras. In 1824, mittees.
when Bishop Heber had given in his adhesion to Missions, the
Calcutta Committee enlarged itself into an Auxiliary Society,
with a constitution broad and inclusive like the Parent Society,
giving all subscribing clergymen seats and votes on the Com-
mittee ; and Madras soon after followed this example. At first
this development seems to have been approved at home ; but in
time it led to serious difficulties, as the Auxiliary Committees,
strong in numbers and influence, were not willing to be directed
by the Parent Committee, and increased the expenditure more
rapidly than the funds could bear, not being fettered by the strict
system of estimates that has prevailed in later years ; and this
was one principal cause of the financial perplexities that presently
arose, as we shall see in a future chapter. Moreover, some of
the chaplains proved to be not at one with the Society in matters
of missionary policy, and friction within the Auxiliary Committees
themselves resulted from this. It does not appear that party
differences in Church matters actually arose ; but Edward Bicker-
steth foresaw that these would certainly ensue some day, and he
urged the Committee to dissolve the Auxiliary Committees, and
form new ones, consisting only of members appointed by name
from home.f The inclusive principle has always worked well in
the Parent Society ; but obviously the circumstances of Indian
Presidency cities are different. Men would assert their right to
seats there who would not dream of asserting it here ; and nothing
but hopeless disunion could be the result. Naturally, however,
the Home Committee shrank from so extreme a step as disband-
ing existing bodies, which had raised considerable local funds,
and were doing good work. The solution of the difficulty, in the
case of Madras, came through the dissensions within the local
body itself. Some of the best members at last resigned, including ^ommfttee
the^lay secretary and treasurer ; and then the Home Committee dissolved,
intervened, dissolved the Auxiliary Committee, and appointed a
* See p. 191.
f See Letter from Henry Venn, in Appendix to second edition of the
Memoir of E. Bickersteth, p. 4.52. Venn mentions the fact as an ilhistration of
Bickerstetli's influence for good in guarding the Society's spiritual principles.
33° Txdia: Progress; of riir. J//s';fo.ys
Part IA'. new Corresponding^ Committee, chiefly from the old members,
IJJ^"^/.; but hmited in numbei-, and at the same time resolved to seek for
'''*'' ""' ii clergyman of some standing to go out as Secretary. Hence the
appointment of John Tucker, who quickly allayed feeling and
won general respect. While holding firmly the Society's Evan-
gelical principles, he understood Church principles also better
than some of his lay colleagues; and but for him, the difficulty
with Rhenius migiit not have been so resolutely dealt with.
A controversy subsequently ensued witii Bishop Daniel Wilson,
on the question of the degree of episcopal control involved in the
acceptance of an episcopal licence ; and even Corrie was obliged to
express his disapproval of the line taken by the Madras Committee.
But the ]\Iadras Conmiittee were backed by Dandeson Coates
at home,-'= and so the Parent Society became involved in a pro-
longed and serious controversy with tlie Bishop who had once been
its most prominent clerical member, to the distress of both sides.
This controversy will be furtiier noticed hereafter. | Its cllc'ct on
the Corresponding Connnittees is all that is before us now. The
Calcutta C'ommittee, which comprised Government officials of
high-standing like Sir Charles Trevelyan, resented the concordat
ultimately come to between the Parent Society and the Bishop,
and in their action to some extent disregarded it ; and good Arch-
deacon Dealtry, one of the Society's best friends, ceased to attend. I
Presently they took a step, touching the location of a young
missionary, contrary to the wishes of both the Home Conunittee
and the Bishop ; and on the Home Committee expressing dis-
approval of this, they resigned in a body. Thus at Calcutta also
Calcutta came the opportunity for substituting a nominated Corresponding
di°sToTved^* Committee for an open one ; and this was immediately done.
It is noteworthy that the two open Connnittees, at' Madras and
r^Lo» Calcutta, were ultimatelv dissolved from exactlv opposite causes.
opposite rpi A r T /~i • ' v • i i
causes. ilie .Madras Committee were not suiriciently to be relied upon in
regard to Evangelical principles. The Calcutta Committee were
too reluctant to recognize the due authority of Bishops. The two
cases well illustrate the difficulty the Home Committee have con-
tinually had to encounter in steering, carefully and prayerfully,
between Scylla and Charybdis. It would be too much to affirm
that they have invariably steered precisely the right course ; but
the blame again and again cast upon them by both sides in turn
is a strong evidence of their honest desire not to be guided by
human applause one way or the other.
There was another matter in which Bishop Wilson was dis-
pleased with the Calcutta Committee. They obtained the consent
of the Home Committee to the starting of a "Head Seminary,"
* See p. 2.52. f See p. 423.
:J: Life of Bishop D. Wilson, vol. ii. p. 19. Canon Bateman is not quite im-
partial in his narrative, though generally accurate as to facts. The account
ill the text coi-rects him in one or two statements, where the Society's
iMiuutes are decisive the other wav.
IxDiA: Progress of the Jlf/ss/ojvs 331
similar to the one begun about the same time at Madras. But at Part IY.
Calcutta there was Bishop's College, and Wilson regarded the ij^^^i'
new Seminary as virtually projected in opposition to it. The 'f^
Home Committee disclaimed any such intention, and passed a Calcutta
resolution recognizing the Bishop's right to make what conditions f^d^'"^*^^
he pleased for ordination, so that if he liked to require that any Bishop's
candidate for orders from the Seminary should first go for further ° ^^^'
study to Bishop's College, they could make no objection. But it
must be confessed that the Society had scarcely ever reaped any
benefit from its large grants to Bishop's College ; and there had
been so much murmuring in England about those grants that the
Committee had been obhged, years before, in 1827, to issue a
circular to their friends descanting on the great advantages to be
gained from them — which advantages certainly never were gained.
The College, in fact, was not a success, as the S.P.G. Eeports
repeatedly and frankly acknowledged ; and the great work of the
Principal, Dr. Mill, was his Christa Sangita, a Life of Christ in
Sanscrit verse, which made a profound sensation among the
Brahmans. But Bishop Wilson gave, one might almost say, his
whole heart to the College. From the first, he did all that man
could do to support and foster it. When sickness drove professors
away, he would go and take the lectures himself ; and he con-
stantly wrote to the S.P.G. Committee to cheer them up about it.
" Your noble College is scarcely ever out of my thoughts," he
said in 1834. "... The College is my delight. I am labouring
with my whole soul to secure its efficiency." ■■'■ One thing is
certain: the C.M.S. Head Seminary never did it any damage.
The Seminary was not successful enough itself, and did not last
very long. Like many other plans, it fell through for lack of an
adequate succession of qualified men.
During the period we have been reviewing there was consider- gg^f/^j^s
able extension of missionary work by various societies in many working
parts. The S.P.G. Missions, both in Bengal and in the South, '" ^"'^*^-
shared in the progress already indicated in connexion with
Krishnagar and Tinnevelly ; and in Tan j ore its congregations
were increased by large accessions from Romanism. f At Cawn-
pore, that excellent missionary, the Rev. W. H. Perkins, was at
work; and at Bombay the Rev. G. Candy, " our beloved brother,"
wrote J. S. S. Robertson, the C.M.S. missionary. A devoted
young man, the Rev. T. Christian, had in 1824-7, from Bhagalpur,
tried to reach the Rajmahal Pahari tribes ; but his early death
caused the further prosecution of this effort to wait for the C.M.S.
Mission begun in 1850. The London Missionary Society w^as
progressing both in Bengal and in its extensive Southern Missions.
* S.P.G. Report, 1835.
t Caldwell wrote in 1850, "In intellect, habits, and morals, the Romanist
Hindus do not differ from the Heathen in the smallest degree." — S.P.G.
Bvjest, p. 541.
2,7,2 India: Progress of the Jf/ss/oxs
Part IV. In j\[r. Lacioix it had probably the best Bengali preacher ever
182-4-il. known. The Baptists had extended in the North, and the
Chap^22. Wesleyans in the South. The Scotch Educational Missions
passed to the Free Church at the great Disruption of 1843.
Dutf, Mackay, and Ewart at Calcutta, John Wilson and Murray
]\Iitchell at Bombay, and John Anderson at Madras, were all
doing splendid work with their colleges ; and Stephen Hislop
had begun at Nagpore. The Basle Mission in Malabar, and the
American Board Mission in Madura, began in 1834 ; the American
Baptist Telugu Mission in 1835 ; the American Presbyterian
Mission in the North-West Provinces in 1836 ; the Irish Presby-
terian Mission in Gujerat, the Leipsic Lutlieran Mission in the
Carnatic, the Welsh Calvinistic Methodist in Bengal, the Berlin
Mission in Behar, all in 1841 ; Gossner's Mission to the Kols in
1846.
Deaths of In the midst of this extension, death closed the careers of two
Nfarsh^"'^ of tlie carlicst and greatest of English missionaries. In 1834 died
man. William Carey, and in 1837 his colleague, Joshua IMarshman, in
each case after about forty years' untiring labours, Carey having
never once come home. They had " expected great things from
God" ; they had " attempted great things for God " ; and " great
things " indeed had God done for them, and, by them, for the
extension of His Kingdom.
Ceylon.
Ceylon in A brief uotc must be appended to this chapter, to prevent Ceylon
this period, (j^.^pp^j^g q-^^^ q{ Q^r History at this time. There is, however,
little to say about the Mission in that Island until a later period.
Patient and prayerful work w^as going on at Cotta, Baddegama,
and Kandy, among the Singhalese, and in the Jaffna Peninsula
among the Tamils ; but the stagnation produced by the old
Dutch policy still continued, although small congregations were
gathered here and there. Some excellent missionaries w^ere at
work, in addition to the four wdio in 1818 had started the
Mission; among them T.Browning, 1820-38; J. Bailey, 1821-
44 ; W. Adley, 1824-46 ; G. C. Trimnell, 1826-47 ; H. Powell
(afterwards Vicar of Bolton and Hon. Canon of Manchester),
1838-45 ; J. F. Haslam (St. John's, Camb., 9th Wrangler), 1838-
50 ; J. T. Johnston, 1841-49 ; C. Greenwood, 1841-50 (when he
was drowned while bathing) ; while within this period W. Oakley
andE. Pargiter began their lengthened careers, the former in 1835,
and the latter in 1845. The first two Native clerg^^men, Cornelius
Jayesinha and Abraham Gunasekara, w'ere ordained by Bishop
Spencer of Madras in 1839, and the third, Cornelius Sennanayaka,
by the first Bishop of Colombo, Dr. Chapman, in 1846.
CHAPTEE XXIII.
The Negro on Both Sides the Atlantic : Enslaved and
Free.
Continued Slave Trade in West Africa — Sickness and Sorrow at Sierra
Leone — Progress notwithstanding— Can the Negro be elevated ? —
West Indian Slavery — Wilberforce and Buxton — The Parlia-
mentary Campaign — West Indian Cruelties — ^Persecution of Mis-
sionaries— Trial and Death of John Smith — Oppression of Negroes
in Jamaica — An Amendment at Exeter Hall — Abolition of Slavery
—Death of Wilberforce— " Compensation for the Slave" — The Day
of Emancipation — Missionary Plans for the Negroes— C. M.S. in
Jamaica — British Guiana Mission — Zachary Macaulay.
" Their cry came lop unto God hy reason of the hondage." — Exod. ii. 23.
^^Is not this the fast that I have chosen!' to loose the ha^ids of wickedness, to
undo the heavy burdens, and to let the oppressed go free, and that ye break every
yoke?" — Isa. Iviii. 6.
I. In TVest Africa.
HE Act of 1807 neither stopped the West African part IV.
Slave Trade nor interfered with West Indian Slavery. 1824r-41.
What it did do was to render illegal the kidnapping Chap. 23.
of Africans by British subjects. The Treaties of Paris African"
and Vienna affected to a large extent the traffic by slave
ships under foreign flags, permitting British cruisers to board going on
vessels suspected to be slavers and to liberate any slaves found ^"ss^fsf "
in them. It was this provision that added so largely to the
population of Sierra Leone, the cargoes of slaves rescued from
the slave-ships being taken thither, as before described.-" But
French, Portuguese, and American vessels continued to engage
actively in the trade, notwithstanding the profession by Prance and
the United States of sincerity in attempts to stop it. The most
horrible details are given year by year in the Missionary Begister,
taken from official reports published in the London Gazette. For
instance, a French captain, having completed his cargo of slaves
in the Old Calabar Eiver, thrust them all into a space between
decks only three feet high, and closed the hatches over them. In
the morning fifty were dead. The fifty bodies were thrown into
the sea, and the captain went ashore to buy fresh slaves to take
their places. Other facts given are too sickening for these pages.
And the number of slaves kidnapped was larger than ever. It
* See p. 94.
334 The Negro on Both Sides the Atlantic :
Part IV. was estimated that within a few months, in 1821, nearly forty
1824-41. thousand slaves were shipped from the Guinea Coast and what
Chap. 23. ^g j^Q^^ know as the Niger Delta. Both in that year and the
following, at "Wilberforce's instance, the House of Commons
unanimously adopted addresses to the Crown, calling attention to
these facts and encouraging the Government to exert more
pressure on foreign powers. But little came of this ; and twelve
years later, in 1835, we find the House again addressing the
Crown and urging that the Powers be called upon to unite in a
Solemn League, declaring the Slave Trade to be Piracy, and
taking effectual measures to put an end to it. But all was in
vain. The year 1838 was worse than any previous one. More
Victims than one thousand a day were either killed on the African coast, or
1000 a day. ([{q^ on the voyage, or were landed in Cuba, Brazil, &c. No
wonder the hateful traffic flourished, seeing that the American
or Portuguese trader realized a profit of from 150 to 200 per
cent. !
The end was not yet. How it was at last brought about will
appear in a future chapter. But all through these years many
thousands — though only a small minority of the whole — of rescued
slaves were landed at Siei'ra Leone, and taxed to the utmost the
material and moral resources of the Colony.
Sierra Meanwhile, the " White Man's Grave " continued to sustain its
tife°white" I'sputation. We have already seen how both Government officials
man's and missionaries were cut off in 1823.''' In 1824 occurred one
^^^'^^- death which was a blow of especial severity to the Colony. Sir
Charles McCarthy, the Governor, fell in one of England's "little
wars " with the Ashantis. The British force was overwhelmed by
a multitude of Ashanti warriors, and most of the officers were
killed. Sir Charles, severely wounded, was taken prisoner, and
immediately put to death. Africa never had a truer friend. At
the C.M.S. Anniversary in 1821 he said a few words in response
to a vote of thanks for his great services to the Colony : —
" Witnessing as I have done the sufferings of our black brethren,
and feeling that it is the influence of Christianity alone which can
make them civilized and happy in this life and happy in a future,
with these impressions I shall shortly return to Africa ; and my
own exertions in this cause, such as they are, shall be continued
to the end of my days." And continued they were, faithfully, to
the last.
The next four years saw the deaths of four more Governors, one
after the other, viz., Sir C. Turner, Sir H. Campbell, Colonel
Denham, and Colonel Lumley.j The missionaries, too, continued
to fall victims to the climate. As late as 1840, there was a dis-
tressing diminution of their number. In January of that year,
* See p. 169.
•|- One of the Governors, a little later, was Major Octavius Temple, father of
the present Archbishop of Canterbury. He also died at Siei-ra Leone in
1834.
Enslaved and Free 335
thirteen (new or returning, and including wives) arrived at Sierra Part IV.
Leone. Before the end of July five of them were dead, and five l«24— tl.
others had had to return to England. But before that, a much ''P' *
worse thing had occurred. In 1831, one of the most trusted of a worse
the missionaries, Mr. Davey, fell into grievous sin, and brought ^'^3}^'^^"
the whole Mission into disgrace ; and, shortly after, there was a
rumour that he had been upset on a river and been drowned. It
is piteous indeed to read the letters of the brethren at this time.
They w'ere crushed down wath sorrow ; and as to the Committee,
their hearts for the moment sank within them. Then, in 1834,
died the last representative of the early bands, J. G. Wilhelm,
after twenty-three years' unbroken and faithful service. "Our
very dear, aged, and venerable brother," Mr. Kissling called him
in sending the news home. " Aged and venerable " in relation
to the average span of life in West Africa — for he was only
fifty-six !
The result of all this w^as that the Mission could with the
greatest difficulty be carried on at all. Stations were without
heads, schools without teachers, congregations without pastors ;
and the attenuated band were worn out in the vain attempt to
cope with the ever-growing work involved in the continual arrival
of fresh cargoes of rescued slaves, ignorant, diseased, vicious,
intractable. The marvel is that any good work was effected at all.
But the Lord did not forsake His servants. He did not suffer
those whom He had taken to Himself to die in vain. Notwith-
standing all difficulties and disappointments, the fruits of the
working of His Spirit were always manifest. Externally the
Colony improved year by year ; and though there was sad declen- Yet the
sion at the very stations, like Eegent, which had received so much ^°'''"' p''"-
. o ' cresses.
blessing, yet true conversions were reported, and there were many
tokens of the steadfastness and consistency of not u. few among
the people. When Henry Townsend, afterwards the honoured
missionary of Abeokuta, went out to Sierra Leone as a school-
master in 1836, he wrote home enthusiastically of what he
saw. Of his first Sunday there he said : —
" No one arriving liere would imagine that he was in a country the
inhabitants of which have been accustomed to idolatry, but in one wliere
God had for many years been worshipped in spirit and in truth. The
solemn stillness of the day of rest reigns around, and numbers of both
sexes are seen hastening to school to learn to read and be instructed in the
Chi'istian religion. ... If every Lord's Day is kept as this one has been,
it shows that they honour C-)od's laws, and that the Spirit of God has been
with them, teaching and guiding them in the path of holiness to the praise
and glory of that grace which has called them from darkness to light." *
And in 1842 a Parliamentary Committee on the Colony gave
this testimony : —
" To the invaluable exertions of the Church ^Missionary Society more
especiall3' — as also, to a considerable extent, as in all our African settle-
* Seddall's Sierra Leone, p. 130.
336 The Negro on Both Sides the Atlantic :
Part IV. ments, to the Wesleyan body — the highest praise is due. By their
1824-41. efforts, nearly one-fifth of the whole population — a most unusually high
Cli::p. 23. proportion in any country — are at school; and the effects are visible
in considei'able intellectual, moral, and religious improvement, — very
considerable under the peculiar circumstances of such a colony."
The Church Missionary Society had then some 7000 regular
attendants at public worship, of whom some 1500 were com-
municants. There were fifty schools, with 6000 pupils. The
Wesleyans at the same time had over 2000 members, and 1500
children at school.
Much earlier than this, the great European mortality had led
the Society to a deep conviction of the paramount importance of
Native Agency. The old "Christian Institution" had not been
a success. The infant Church had not then the material for a
Seminary of picked African youths. But in 1827, it was super-
Fourah seded by a new institution established at Fourah Bay, under the
Coiie e direction of the Eev. C. L. P. Hilnsel, a very superior Basle man
ordained by the Bishop of London. He started with six youths,
and the first name on the roll is the now honoured name of
Samuel Crowther. The Fourah Bay College, during its seventy
years' career, has from time to time suffered from the same cause
as all the other departments of the Mission, the sickness and
removal of labourers, and sometimes it has had to be closed for a
time. The Principal who succeeded in carrying it on longest
without interruption was the Eev. Edward Jones, an American
coloured clergyman of the Episcopal Church of the United States,
who took up the w^ork in 1840, and continued in it more than
twenty years. And notwithstanding all disadvantages, the Fourah
Bay College has, as a matter of fact, educated the majority of the
African clergy and many of the leading laity. In 1845 was
founded the Grammar School, which, also under native manage-
ment, flourished and became self-supporting ; and a Girls'
Boarding School, afterwards known as the Annie Walsh Female
Institution, w^hich likewise has proved a blessing to the Colony.
Much discussion went on in England from time to time as to
whether the African was capable of being raised perceptibly in
the scale of civilization, and in particular, whether he had intellect
for anything more than very elementary study. In 1829, two
speakers, at different Anniversaries, used the same striking
illustration in dealing with this question. Powell Buxton said : —
Briton " Some centuries ago, a Roman army, headed by their most illustrious
slaves and Chief, visited a small and obscure Island in the Atlantic, where the
slaves." people were brutal and degraded, and as wild as the wildest beasts ; find
the then Chief Orator of Rome, writing to a friend, said, ' There is a
slave-ship arrived in the Tiber, laden with slaves from that Island ;
but,' he adds, ' don't take one of them : they are not tit for use.' That
Island was Britain ! Yet Rome has found her rival in Britain ; and the
descendants of those British slaves have far surpassed the sons of the
haughty Romans ! May not a day arrive when the sons of these
E.YS LAVED AND FrEE 337
degraded Africans will run with you the race of religion and morality, Part IV.
and even outstrip you in the glorious career ? " 182-i--tl.
And Dr. Philip, the distinguished L.M.S. missionary in South "
Africa, referred to the very same incident : —
" Calling one morning on a gentleman, I was shown into his library ;
and while waiting I took up Cicero's letters to Atticus. One of the first .
letters which caught my eye was that in which the Roman orator com-
plains of the stupidity of slaves from Britain. Just as I had finished
reading it, my eye lighted on two busts placed on opposite sides of the
room — Cicero and Isaac Ne^vton, — and I could not help exclaiming, ' See
what that Man says of that Man's country ! ' " *
Fourah Bay College, and the other two institutions, did much
to prove that the African was quite able, if only he had equal
advantages, to hold his own with the European.
In 1840, the Sierra Leone congregations combined to form a Sierra
Church Missionary Association, which remitted to the Society £87 c^m! asso.
in its first year, and in the next thirty years raised no less than ciation.
£7000 for the Evangelization of the World. But the further
development of the African Church does not belong to our present
period, and here we must stop for the present.
II. hi the West Indies.
While the French, Spanish, and American slave-traders were
still robbing West Africa of thousands of its people, the minds of
Christian men in England were turning to the condition of the
Negro slaves themselves in the British West Indian Colonies, slavery
The Act of 1807 had abolished the British Slave Trade, but it had %^^^l^
left intact the property of the West Indian planters in human vvest
flesh and blood. There were nearly a million of black slaves in ^"'^''^^*
Jamaica, Barbadoes, Trinidad, and the other islands belonging
to England, and in Demerara and other parts of what is now
British Guiana on the mainland of South America. Every slave's
child born into the world in this population was apparently
doomed to interminable bondage ; but that word " interminable "
the Committee of the Church Missionary Societ}^ began, in 1823,
to hope might not prove to be applicable. " They begin," said the
Eeport of that year, "to conceive hopes that ere long they shall
be enabled to blot it out of the Society's records. They cannot
but anticipate with joy that day when the Illustrious Advocate of
the African Eace shall witness that great consummation of his
toil — a public and solemn provision for securing the personal
freedom of every African throughout the British dominions.
The Committee invoke most earnestly the aid of the whole body
of members in this cause."
The " Illustrious Advocate of the African Eace " had, two years
before this, in May, 1821, finding age and infirmit}^ increasing,
appealed to a young member of Parliament to take up the mantle
* Missionanj Register, 1820, p. 252.
VOL. I. Z
338
The Negro on Both Sides the Atlantic :
Part IV.
1824-41.
Chap. 23.
Wilber-
force com-
mits the
cause to
Buxton.
Anti-
Slavery
Society
formed.
that was falling from him — token though it be, hke Elijah's,
of isolation and reproach, — and to follow up the Abolition of the
Slave Trade by the Abohtion of Slavery. That young member
was Thomas Fowell Buxton. Brought into the full hght of the
Gospel, and to unreserved dedication of himself to the service
of Christ, under the ministry of Josiah Pratt at Wheler Chapel,
Spitalfields, Buxton had determined to use his parliamentary
position for the benefit of the oppressed at home and abroad. His
marriage to Hannah Gurney, of Earlham, a younger sister of
Elizabeth Fry, had brought him into the philanthropic circle
that was then doing so much to reform the Criminal Law and
improve the prisons ; and it was a s]3eech of his on Sir James
Mackintosh's Bill for reducing the number of crimes punishable
with death (then 230 !) that led William Wilberforce to make him
his " parliamentary executor." -■' " After what passed last night,"
wrote Wilberforce the very next day, "I can no longer forbear
resorting to you, and conjuring you to take most seriously into
consideration the expediency of your devoting yourself to this
blessed service. . . . Let me then entreat you to form an alliance
with me, that may be truly termed holy ; t and if I should be
unable to commence the war, and still more if, when commenced,
I should (as certainly would, I fear, be the case) be unalile to
finish it, I entreat that you would continue to prosecute it." %
Only two months before this, Buxton's sister-in-law, Priscilla
Gurney, had died in his house. On her death-bed she called him
to her side and seemed anxious to say something very important ;
but she was too far gone, and could only press his hand and
murmur, "The poor dear slaves !" § Wilberforce's letter, there-
fore, came to one whose heart was already touched ; and after
long and prayerful consideration the " holy alHance " was entered
into.
At the beginning of 1823 was formed the Anti-Slavery Society,
with the Duke of Gloucester, brother of the King, as President.
Wilberforce immediately issued a powerful pamphlet. An Ajyjjeal
on behalf of the Slaves, which made a profound impression. The
Quakers sent a petition to Parliament, the first on the subject ;
and Wilberforce, in presenting it on March 19th, reminded the
House that it was they who had, nearly thirty years before,
given him for presentation the first petition against the Slave
Trade. "Was it," asked Canning, then Secretary for the
Colonies, "his intention to found any motion on the petition?"
"No," replied Wilberforce, "but such is the intention of an
esteemed friend of mine"; whereupon Buxton, thus publicly
introduced as his successor, immediately rose and gave notice
* Life of Sir T. F. Buxton, p. 141.
t In obvious allusion to tho " Holy Alliance" tlien lately formed by certain
of tho European Powers.
+ L^fe of Sir T. F. Buxton, p. 103.
§ lUd., p. 106.
Enslaved and Free 339
of a resolution, which, on May 15th, he formally moved, as Part IV.
follows :— 1824^1.
. . . . Chap. 23.
" That the state of slavery is repugnant to the principles of the British
Constitution and of the Christian Religion ; and that it ought to be Buxton's
gradually abolished throughout the British Colonies with as much ^'^^^
expedition as may be found consistent with a due regard to the well- parlia-
being of the parties concerned." ment.
His plan w^as that existing slaves should be better treated, be
allowed lawful marriage, have provision for their religious instruc-
tion, and opportunity to work out their own freedom ; and that all
Negro children born after a certain day should be free — so that in
the course of a few years slavery would automatically die out.
No proposal could be more moderate, or less revolutionary. The
Abolitionists were accused of seeking to demoralize the slaves by
freeing them before they were fit for freedom ; but, as Buxton's
biographer well observes, " it was they who desired to approach
emancipation by a long series of preparatory measures ; it was
the planters w^ho rejected these preparatory measures, because
they would lead to ultimate emancipation." But Buxton, in his
speech, was plain enough as to where the right lay to the bodies who owns
of the slaves :— the slave's
body ?
" We have been so long accustomed to talk of ' my slave ' and ^ ifour
slave,' and what he will fetch if sold, that we are apt to imagine that he
is really yours or mine, and that we have a substantial right to keep or
sell him. Here is a certain valuable commodity, and here are two
claimants for it, a white man and a black man. Wliat is the commodity
in dispute ? The body of the black man. The white man says, ' It is
mine,' and the black man, ' It is mine.' The claim of the black man is
just this — Nature gave it him. Will any man say he came by his body
in an illegal manner ? Does any man suspect he played the knave and
purloined his own limbs ? I do not mean to say the Negro is not a
thief ; but he must be a very subtle thief indeed if he stole even so much
as his own little finger !
'• Then we come to the claim of the white man. You received him from
your father — -very good. Your father bought him from a neighbouring
planter — very good. That planter bought him of a trader in the
Kingston slave-market, and that trader bought him of a man-merchant
in Africa. So far you are quite safe. But how did the man-merchant
acquire him ? lie stole him ! '' *
This inimitable argument — as witty as it was seriously irre-
fragable— seems very much a matter of course now. It is hard
to remember that within the lifetime of Queen Victoria there were
thousands of honourable and respectable Englishmen who declined
to admit it, and who were strongly represented in Parliament.
The Government, however, proposed to meet Buxton half-w^ay,
by recommending, though not requiring, the local Legislatures to
adopt measures for ameliorating the condition of the slaves wdth
a view to their future emancipation ; and Canning's amendment
to this effect being carried, circulars in accordance with it were
* Life of Buxton, p. 114.
z 2
340 The Negro on Both Sides the Atlantic-
Part IV. addressed to the different Colonies. But the uselessness of such
1824.-41. gentle measures was soon apparent. The news of the debate
Chap. 23. treated the most violent excitement in the West Indies. The
indigna- indignation of the planters knew no bounds, and the rancour of
tionofthe their language is almost inconceivable. It was openly proposed
indfan to throw off the yoke of England and join the United States. On
planters. ^^ other hand, the slaves imagined that the great King of
England had ordered their freedom, and that the masters were
keeping them out of their rights. Some refused to work, and
resisted compulsion, and some committed outrages on the white
men. The disturbances were soon suppressed, however, by the
troops; and "pressed down and running over was the measure
of vengeance dealt to the unhappy Negroes." Moreover the news
of the outbreaks produced a revulsion of feeling in England ; the
half-hearted supporters of abolition at once fell away ; and Buxton
was for a time the most unpopular man in Parliament, and
perhaps in England.
Persecu- The wrath of the West Indians did not stop at their slaves.
l'i°narrs^" ^o^' ^^^ny ycars, faithful and patient missionary work had been
done among them by missionaries of the London, Baptist,
Wesleyan, and Moravian Societies ; * and upon them fell the
bitterest reproaches. Because, so far as their httle influence
went, they had pleaded the cause of their suffering flocks, they
were supposed to have fostered the insurrection. In reality it
was their teachings that prevented the revolt being more general,
and led even the slaves who did rise to spare the lives of the
whites that fell into their hands. " We will take no life," said
some of the rioters, " for our pastors have taught us not to take that
which we cannot give." But in Demerara, in 1823, a missionary of
Case of the L.M.S., John Smith, was tried by court-martial for aiding and
smkh abetting them, and although the evidence showed that he had
been especially earnest in counselling patient obedience, and had
offended the slave-leaders by so doing, he was sentenced to death.
The Home Government remitted the capital sentence, but mean-
while Smith had died of the hardships he endured in prison.
Great excitement ensued in England. Again public opinion
veered round. Henry (afterwards Lord) Brougham brought forward
Debate in (June 2nd, 1824) a vote of censure in the House of Commons,
showing that the trial had been illegally conducted, and that
the officers who conducted it were influenced by the violent anti-
negro prejudices of the slave-proprietors. Dr. Lushington and
Sir James Mackintosh supported him in speeches that moved
the whole country. Canning, naturally unwilling to condemn
British officers, but seeing direct opposition hopeless, moved
the "previous question," which enabled the Government to
evade the motion. But in his speech, he pointedly separated
* The small C.M.S. and S.P.G. work has been previously mentioned ; see
p. 218. Their enlarged Missions were later.
Parlia
ment.
Enslaved and Free 34I
himself from the pro-slavery party. He actually thanked PartIV.
Broiigham for his exertions; he disclaimed any " mdiflerence ^^Z^i^
to the rehgious instruction of the slaves" on the part of the J__
Government ; he protested against the " monstrous doctrmes
propagated by some of the colonists with a view of puttmg out
the light of natural and revealed rehgion " ; and he warned them
against " any attempt in future to discourage religion or molest
its teachers." It was in these debates that Wilberforce spoke ^/^'^.^last
for the last time in Parhament. speech.
Nevertheless, the Anti-slavery leaders were compelled by
Canning's policy of "recommendations" to rest on their oars for
a while ; and meantime they set to work to inform the Enghsh
people of the real condition of the Negroes, which was little
understood. No doubt many of those who had property in the
West Indies really desired that their slaves should be well
treated, and beheved that they actually were well treated ; and it
was natural that they should resent the imputations cast upon
all slaveholders alike. But they were sadly ignorant of the
facts. They knew not what their agents and overseers were
doing. They did know, however, quite enough. They knew, or ^^-^l^'^^^^^
might have know^n, that their slaves worked on the sugar-planta- Negroes,
tions nineteen hours a day in crop time, and fourteen hours and a
half at other times ; that they w^ere kept at work, the weak and
sickly equally with the strong and heahhy, by the threat of the
whip ; that the slave's " scanty supply of food and clothing was a
source of constant and bitter suflering ; that his domestic ties
were utterlv dissolved ; that every hindrance was thrown in the
way of his education ; that his religious teachers were persecuted ;
that his day of rest was encroached on ; - that every prospect of
civil rights was taken away ; that however grievous an injury was
inflicted on him, to obtain redress was almost impossible ; and
that the slightest offences subjected him to the severest punish-
ments, to the stocks, to the prison, to the lash." t These things
were general, and not seriously denied ; but the charge of cruel
flogging was denied. The returns of punishments, however, given
in by the planters themselves for the two years 1828-9 showed a
total of 68,921 floggings, of which 25,094 were duly registered as
inflicted on females; and the law allowed twenty-five stripes to
each ordinary "punishment." At this very time the Jamaica
House of Assembly re-affirmed by a large majority the right to
flog women publicly and indecently. Another new law forbad f^^^^^,^^
Negroes " teaching or preaching as Anabaptists or otherwise," ^etoed^by
under pain of " whipping, or imprisonment wdth hard labour"; ^ '"^"
and also prohibited all religious meetings or services between
sunset and sunrise, which w^as equivalent to forbidding them
altogether. Upon this enactment of a "Christian" legislature
* In one case, a manager put all his Negroes in the stocks on Sundays, to
prevent their attending chapel. C. S. Home, Story oj the L.M.8., p. 161.
t Life of Buxton, p. 213.
34-
The Negro on Both Sides the Atlantic .
Part IV.
182Jr-il.
Chap. 23.
Lord Sligo
confirms
Buxton's
state-
ments.
C.M.S.
agents
An Amend'
ment at
Exeter
Hall.
the Home Government imposed the royal veto ; whereupon the
Jamaica Assembly re-enacted it, with severer penalties. The
King's veto had to be put in exercise a second time. What
George IV. had done, William IV. now repeated.
But in the meanwhile, not unnaturally, another insurrection
broke out, and was suppressed with more terrible severity than
ever. Moreover the missionaries who sought to minister to the
Negroes were bitterly opposed and persecuted ; one Wesleyan
who had disobeyed the law thus twice disallowed by the King of
England died in a horrible dungeon ; and many chapels were
destroyed by white mobs, while the magistrates looked on. Two
or three of the missionaries, notably Knibb, a Baptist, came to
England, and horrified many public meetings by a recital of what
they and their flocks had endured. Of course their accounts
were received in official circles with scepticism ; but Lord Sligo,
Governor of Jamaica, wrote afterwards (in 1835) to Buxton, —
" When I W'cnt out to Jamaica I thought that the stories of the
cruelty of the slave-owners disseminated by your society were
mei'ely the emanations of enthusiastic persons, — rather a carica-
ture than a faithful representation of what did actually take place.
Before I had been long in Jamaica, I had reason to think that the
real state of the case had been far understated ; and this, I am
quite convinced, was the fact." "-■'
The opposition was not confined to Methodists and "Anabap-
tists." There w^ere C.M.S. catechists and schoolmasters who met
with similar treatment. Eor when the Bishoprics of Jamaica and
Barbadoes were established in 1824, the Church Missionary
Society enlarged the operations it had been carrying on upon a
small scale on three or four of the West India Islands,! though
even then the scale was very small compared with that of the
Nonconformist Missions. The work really consisted of supporting
schools, and providing schoolmasters and catechists. This was
chiefly upon estates whose owners did not join in the general
hostility to the religious instruction of the Negroes ; \ though in
some cases, especially in Demerara, the Society's agents suffered
almost as much as those who were called " sectarian teachers."
It was in this connexion that the Amendment to the Annual
Report w^as moved on the first occasion of the Anniversary
Meeting being held in Exeter Hall, as before mentioned. § The
Eeport, as read, said, " There are honourable and bright excep-
tions. There are among the West-Indian Proprietors some
Christian Men, who have come forward, in the face of much
opposition and reproach, for the benefit of the Slaves on their
* Life of Buxton, p. 317. t See p. 218.
X The S.P.G., as trustee of the Codrington estates in Barbadoes, was a
slave-owner, but acted with so much wisdom and kindness that its Negroes
were virtually enfranchised before the Abolition Act, and formed an indiistrioiis,
peaceful, and religious community. See S.P.G. Digest, jj. 202.
§ See p. 278.
Enslaved and Free 343
Estates, and who, by imparting to them the benefits of Christian PartIV.
Instruction, are materially promoting their spnitual welfare, as ^ ^^
w^ell as efficiently preparing them for the right use and enjoyment __
of liberty." This sentence, hterally true as it was, w^as objected to
by the Eev. S. C. Wilks, Editor of the Christian Observer, for fear
advantage should be taken of it to discount the statements made
regarding the general oppression of the slaves. He moved that
these words be added:— "But still, such is the power of the
System, that the very Friends of the Slaves cannot carry then-
wishes into full effect, but are cramped and crippled in then-
exertions." This Amendment, or rather rider, did not lead to the
uproarious scenes that were witnessed the following day at the
Bible Society's meeting ; -■■- for Daniel Wilson (not yet Bishop of
Calcutta) at once rose and seconded it, and his influence was so
great that no further discussion ensued, but it was put to the
meeting and carried almost unanimously.
Meanw^iile the serious proceedings of the white population m
Jamaica elicited from Lord Goderich, the Colonial Secretary m Lord^.^^^^
Lord Grey's Ministry, a remarkable despatch,! in which he despatch,
said : —
" Nothing can justify the systematically withholding from any men or
class of men a Kevelation given for the common benefit of all. I could
not therefore acknowledge that the Slaves in Jamaica could be permitted
to live and die amidst the darkness of Heathen Idolatry, whatever
efiect the advancing light of Christianity might ultimately have on the
relation of Master and Slave. Nor am I anxious to conceal my opmion
that a change in this relation is the natural tendency, and must be the
ultimate result of the difihsion of religious knowledge among them. . . .
So long as the Islands were peopled by importations of Native Africans
who lived and died in Heathenism, the relation of Master and Slave
might be expected to be permanent ; but now that an indigenous race
of men has grown up, speaking our own language and instructed m our
religion, alhthe more harsh rights of the Owner, and the blind submis-
sion of the Slave, will inevitably, at some period, more or less remote,
come to an end."
" More or less remote "—that was a cautious w^ay of still appeal-
ing even to the self-interest of the planters. But it was their
obstinacy that turned the " more " into " less." The Anti- Slavery
leaders had ere this come to the conclusion that the gradual
measures of amelioration which they had advocated in 1823
would be of Httle avail even if adopted. They now saw the
fallacy of their own admission that " no people ought to be free
till they are fit to use their freedom." " This maxim," said
Macaulay, " is w-orthy of the fool in the old story, who resolved
not to go intQ the water till he had learned to swim." I And m
May, 1830, a great meeting was held in Freemasons' Hall to
proclaim that the object now to be fought for was immediate and
* See p. 279. t rri^ted in t'le ilisHionanj Register, 1832, p. 274.
X Essay on Milton. Essays, vol. i. p. 42.
344 The Negro on Both Sides the Atlantic:
Part IV. unconditional Abolition. William Wilberforce, who had for five
1824-41. years retired from public life, came forth from his retirement to
Ohap. 16. ^g^]^Q ^]^Q chair, and with enfeebled frame and weakened voice
■wiiber- delivered a most impressive address.''' Brougham, Lushington,
s°e"chin^* T. B. Macaulay, Buxton, Lords Calthorpe and Milton, Daniel
public. Wilson, and others spoke ; and the gist of the string of resolutions
was that every effort was to be made to ensure " the early
and universal Extinction of Slavery in all the Possessions of the
British Crown."
Three more years, however, elapsed ; and it is needless here
to detail Buxton's exertions in Parliament in the face of both
open opposition and half-hearted support. The thrilling story of
them is given in full in his Life. At length, on May 14th, 1833,
Mr. Stanley,! who had succeeded Lord Goderich as Colonial
Secretary in the Whig Ministry, introduced the Government
The Bill, proposing the abolition of Slavery throughout the British
Abolition dominions, but a temporary apprenticeship of the slaves to their
existing masters, as a transition measure, and a vote of twenty
millions sterling as compensation for the loss of property. The
Bill passed on August 28th. Wilberforce did not see that day ;
but he lived to know the Bill was safe. "The Moses of
the African Israelites," as Colquhoun observes, w^as spared to
witness the children of his watchful oversight just stepping
Death of into their promised land.]: He entered into rest on July 29th,
force ^'^' exclaiming with fervour on his dying bed, " Thank God that
I should have lived to witness a day in which England is
willing to give twenty millions sterling for the Abolition of
Slavery ! "
"The past year," said the C.M.S. Committee in their next
Annual Eeport, "will be ever memorable, in the history of this
Country, for the termination of an arduous and painful conflict
which, in various forms, has agitated the Councils of the Nation
during half a century. That Veteran Philanthropist of whose
death the Committee feel it is almost impossible for them to
speak, since all hearts feel toward his memory more than words
can utter, was permitted by Divine Providence to live just long
enough to witness the crowning of his laboui's, and, after a noble
warfare of fifty years, to close his eyes with peaceful triumph and
adoring wonder at the thought that he had lived to see the
day."
The speeches at the May Meetings that year, 1834, are stirring
+p read, even now ; especially Buxton's at the Wesley an Anni-
compensa- vt'^'s^iy- At the C.M.S. Meeting, Hugh Stowell dwelt on the
tion for twt^ty millions Compensation. " But where," he exclaimed, " is
ownef,^but the Co'^^ps^sation for the Slave?" His eloquent periods were
what for
the slave ? ^ Priijed in the UUsionarxj Reaisier, July, 1830, p. 292 ; see also p. 216.
t Aftery^^'<is the Earl of Derby, Leader of the Conservative Party and
Prime Miniltsr. He was then a Whig.
+ Wilberfo'f'^ *"^^ '*'•*'' Friends, p. 416.
Enslaved and Free 345
afterwards put, says the Missionary Bcgister, by " a delighted Part IY.
hearer," into the following stanzas : — 1824-41.
Chap. 23.
Yes ! wisely and well has oui' Senate decided,
And the deed shall a gem in its diadem stand !
By Mercy and Justice its counsels were guided,
And Slavery's moanings have ceased in the land.
But though Providence thus has your fiat directed.
One proof of additional zeal I would crave,
Your care has the I'ights of the Master protected.
Oh, let Compensation extend to the Slave !
Yet what for his ills can afford reparation,
His spirits restore, or his vigour renew Y
Golconda's vast wealth were a poor compensation.
Too trivial a boon were the mines of Peru.
Oh ! give him the Records of Light and of Gladness,
The " Pearl of great price " for his portion decree,
There show him, we all were in bondage and sadness,
Till by Christ's precious blood we were ransom'd and free.
Ye have viTonged him — ye think on those wrongs vsath contrition —
Like Zaccha^us a four-fold requital bestow ;
Send the faithful and good on a merciful mission.
And lead him the way of Salvation to know.
This, this shall be lasting and true Compensation,
More pure than the ransom that lately ye gave ;
For the Saviour shall speak, through His blest Revelation,
Glad tidings of Freedom and Peace to the Slave.
The day of emancipation had been fixed for August 1st, 1834. The day of
It was observed with gratitude to God by many friends in tion.
England.''' And wdth much prayer ; for they hardly dared to
whisper to one another their secret apprehensions of what might
be going on that day in the West Indies. " Would not," writes
Buxton's son and biographer, " the gloomy predictions of the West
Indians be now^ fulfilled? The bloodshed, the rioting, the
drunkenness, the confusion, they had so often foretold — would
not these tarnish the lustre of this glorious deed of the British
people ? ' '
" It was therefore," he goes on, " with feelings of deep solicitude that
Mr. Buxton and his friends awaited the news from the Colonies. He
was at Northrepps Hall, when, on the 10th of September, a large pile of
letters came in with the colonial stamps upon them. He took them,
still sealed, in his hand, and walked out into the wood ; desiring no
witness but One of the emotion and anxiety he experienced. He opened
them ; and deep indeed was his joy and gratitude to God when he
found that one letter after another was tilled with accounts of the
admirable conduct of the Negroes on the great day of freedom.
Throughout the Colonies the churches and chapels had been thrown
open, and the slaves had crowded into them, on the evening of the 31st
of July. As the hour of midnight approached, they fell upon their
knees, and awaited the solemn moment. When twelve sounded from
the chapel bells, they sprang upon their feet, and through every island
* On August 1st, 1884, the Jubilee of the day was celebrated by a great
meeting in the Guildhall, the Prince of Wales presiding.
346 The Negro on Both Sides the Atlantic:
Part IV. rang the glad Konnd of thanksgiving to the Fatlier of all ; for the chains
1824 41. were broken, and the slaves were free."*
Chap. 23. . -r. ■ , 1 . • . ,
In the Missionary Begister f many touching narratives of the
observance of the day are recorded. It is mentioned that one of
the hymns sung as the Negroes rose to their feet at midnight,
free men, was Charles Wesley's "Blow ye the trumpet, blow " —
"which," says a missionary correspondent, "had we ever given
it out before, would have subjected us to a charge of treason."
The prayers of some of the people are given ; here is one : —
"Blessed Lord ! AVe want tongue, Ave want word, we want heart, to
praise Dee. Debil don't do de good to ns, but Don do de good to us ; for
Don put it into the heart of l)lessed European to grant us dis great
])rivi1ege. O derefore may none of we poor sinner praise de debil by
niakin all de carouze about de stieet, but fock like dove to deir window
to praise and glorify Dy Great Name ! "
But the Compensation for the Slave of which Hugh Stowell had
spoken — what of that? It was not forgotten. All the societies
New Mis- set to woi'k to extend their Missions in the West Indies, and the
sions to the Government voted large sums in aid of Christian education for the
Negroes. The S.P.G., aided by a Eoyal Letter and the Govern-
ment Grants, expended in the next fifteen years £171,000 upon
that object, j The Church Missionary Society took counsel with
the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of London, and tlic
former forwarded memorials from the Committee to the Bishops
of Jamaica and Barbadoes. The Society had for some years been
at work in Jamaica, in Antigua, in some of the smaller islands,
and in Demerara on the mainland ; and a Church Missionary
Association had been formed in Jamaica in 1827, with Sir G. H.
Rose as President. But now the Committee proposed more ex-
tended work ; and in doing so, they not only thought of the
immediate benefit to the liberated Negroes, but fully expected
that the result would, in course of time, be the provision of W'est
Indian coloured missionaries for Africa. With a view to this
especially, the Rev. C. L. F. Hansel, one of the ablest missionaries
at Sierra Leone, § was commissioned to go to Jamaica and start a
Large Normal Institution for Negro teachers. The vigour with which
c "m^s^ the new plans were carried out will be gathered from the fact
that in 1838 the Society had in Jamaica, Trinidad, and Demerara,
thirteen ordained missionaries, twenty-three English catechists
and schoolmasters, seventy schools, 6000 scholars, and 8000
persons at public worship. Government gave the Society laige
sums to build and maintain schools ; and in 1840 a meeting of
"planters, merchants, and others interested in Jamaica" was
held at Willis's Rooms with a view to getting substantial help for
them, the result of which, "not much exceeding £1000," actually
disappointed the Committee.
* Life of Baxtov, p. 296. t 1834, pp. 464—470.
+ S.P.G. Digest, p. 195. § See p. 336.
Enslaved and Free 347
The results of the work were certainly not disappomting. In Part IV.
1840, the Committee reported of Jamaica, " Large congregations l^^^^}^
have been gathered ; numbers of the Negroes have been baptized ; ""^^^' •
classes for Confirmation have been formed ; a considerable number Results,
have been confirmed by the Bishop ; and of these, many have
become communicants. Week-day lectures. Missionary Meetings,
Sunday Schools, Day and Evening Schools, Infant Schools, &c., are
carried on." In Barbadoes the Society had intended to work,
but was prevented by difliculties arising through the Bishop
requiring missionaries to the Negroes to be under the authority
of the rectors of the parishes into which the Island was divided.'''
The parochial system, indeed, was perhaps more complete in the
West Indies than in any other Colony, owing to the liberality of
the State provision of funds ; and this subsequently facilitated
the withdrawal of the Society from the Islands altogether. The
immediate cause of this step was the alarming condition of the
Society's finances in 1839-41, of which more hereafter. The
withdrawal was gradual : some of the missionaries were taken on c.m.s.
to the colonial establishments ; when others died, their places draw's,
were not filled up ; the Normal School in Jamaica was transferred
to the Trustees of the Lady Mico Charity, which has been a great
benefit to that island ; and by 1848 the last link had been severed.
The Society naturally incurred much blame for having thus put
its hand to the plough and then looked back ; but when we come
to the financial position, we shall see that drastic measures some-
where were inevitable, and it seemed to the Committee that the
West Indian work, interesting and important as it was, was of a
less definitely missionary character than the work in Africa, India,
and other great Heathen fields. Meanwhile the S.P.G. and the
Nonconformist Missions continued their operations, and were the
instruments of great good among the Negro population.
To one branch of the West Indies Mission the Society clung
longer. This was the Mission to the Indians of British Guiana, British
which had been commenced as an offshoot from Demerara. Mission.
With this work one honoured name is connected, that of the Rev.
J. H. Bernau, a Basle man who received further training at
Islington, and, having been ordained by the Bishop of London,
went out in 1835. For eighteen years he laboured zealously, and
gathered a small congregation of Indians of three or four different
tribes ; and his work at Bartica Grove was watched with prayerful
interest by many friends in England. In 1855 this Mission was
closed, and afterwards came under the charge of the S.P.G.,
which still labours in the country. One of its missionaries, Mr.
Brett, did a remarkable work for more than forty years. Mr.
Bernau, in later years, was Incumbent of Belvedere in Kent. He
* This was a long controversy, into which it would be unprofitable to enter
now, as the West Indies Mission did not continue many years. The Committee
were at one time troubled by strong articles in the Ricord against the Bishop,
which they seriously disapproved and publicly repudiated.
348 The Negro on Both Sides the Atlantic
Part IV. died in 1890, aged eighty-five. He was the father of Mrs. A. E.
l«"'-^^l- Moule.
idp^- . ^y^ xixxx'sX not bid farewell to the West Indian Negro without a
One more tribute to the memory of one man who has not been mentioned in
the Negro, ^^^^^ chapter, and only casually in former chapters as one of the
Mai^Jia ^o^^^^ers of the Church Missionary Society. Zachary Macaulay
^""^y- was not in Parliament ; he was not a platform speaker ; he was
not in the pubhc eye a representative of the Anti- Slavery cause
like Wilberforce or Buxton. But it was he who toiled unceasingly
behind the scenes, wading through blue-books, coUating and
grouping evidence, preparing memorials, writing pamphlets, and
ready at all times, like a walking handbook or dictionary, to be
referred to touching any and every detail of the subject ; so that
Wilberforce once said, when information was wanted, " Let us
look it out in Macaulay." No man knew the Negro as he did.
He had passed his youth in Jamaica, as overseer of an estate. He
had been Governor of Sierra Leone in the earliest days of the
Colony. The result was, that, as Colquhoun says, — " One object
filled his eye and engrossed his soul : —
" He had heard the bay of the bloodhound
On tlie track of the hunted slave ;
The lash and the curse of the master,
And the groan that the captive gave.
" Ho had seen in the cane-fields of Jamaica the Negro's weary
step and sunken condition; he had watched him toiling under
tropical suns, and engaged through long nights in the intolerable
pressure of sugar-straining. He had tracked him to his African
home by the steaming rivers of reeds and mangroves ; and from
the reedy banks he had seen him torn — bound, manacled, and
driven like a beast on shipboard — to be squeezed into a stifling
hold, to die worse than the death of a dog, and to be flung like
carrion into the waves. The memory of these horrors haunted
him, and he never rested till they were put down." - Outliving
Wilberforce by four years, he died in 1838. He is chiefly known
now as Lord Macaulay's father; but if Thomas Babington
Macaulay had never been born, the name of Zachary Macaulay
would, on its own account, be worthy of everlasting remembrance.
* Wilberforce and his Friends, p. 251.
CHAPTEE XXIV.
Greek, Copt, Abyssinian, Zulu, Maori, Australian, Gree.
Malta, Syra, Smyrna — Egypt and Abyssinia: S. Gobat ; Lieder ; Isen-
berg and Krapf — The Zulu Mission : Francis Owen — New Zealand :
First Baptisms; New Missionaries; Extension; Charles Darwin;
Bishop Broughton ; Marsden's Last Visit and Death — New Hol-
land Mission : the Australian Blacks — Rupert's Land : the Cree
and the Soto; Cockran and Cowley; Bishop Mountain's Visit.
" And gathered them out of the lands, from the east, and from the ivest, from the
north, and from the south."- — Ps. cvii. 3.
" Whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, . . . depart thence." — St.
Mark vi. 11.
I. The Greek, the Copt, and the Abyssinian.
|HE earlier history of what was for many years known as Part IV.
the Mediterranean Mission has been told in connexion 1824-41.
with the efforts to revive the Oriental Churches. ^^^^P- ^'*-
Those efforts were continued and developed during the vv-oriTfbr
period now under review. Malta was still the base, so ^^^'^^^^
to speak, of the enterprise. Jowett continued there (with intervals)
till 1832 ; ■'■ but the leading mind in the very important literary
work carried on was Christopher F. Schlienz, one of the Basle
men, and an accomplished scholar, who in sixteen years sent
out from the Malta Press hundreds of thousands of portions Malta
of Scripture, books, and tracts, in Italian, Maltese, Modern P""^^^-
Greek, Turkish, Arabic, and Amharic. Purchasers appeared from
all parts of the Turkish Empire — w^hich was then much larger
than it is now — and North Africa. Perhaps Schlienz's most
important work was his Arabic Bible and Prayer-book, and
Turkish and Amharic Prayer-books. In producing the three
latter the S.P.C.K. gave pecuniary aid. One of his assistants
was a remarkable man w^hose name became well known in after
years, George Percy Badger. He was a printer by trade, and
an Islington student. He w^as afterwards ordained by Bishop
Blomfield and sent by the S.P.G. to Persia ; then for some years
he was chaplain at Aden ; and in his later years, which were
* He went out for the third time in 1829. The Instructions then delivered
to him are a masterly and comprehensive review of the whole position and
outlook in the East ; presumably by Bickersteth, though they read more like
Pratt's — who, liowever, was not then Secretary.
3SO Greek, Copt, Abvss/A'/a.v, Zulu,
Part IV. spent in the Cape Colony, he was one of the most celebrated of
1824-41. Arabic scholars, and received the Lambeth degree of D.C.L. from
Lhap^^4. Archbishop Tait. He died in 1888.
The establishment of the Kingdom of Greece led to high antici-
pations of a general revival of Greek influence in the East, and
Gr«'ce '" ^^^® Society, encouraged by the reception given by Greek bishops
to Mr. Hartley, the Oxford man " who was continuing the travels
and researches among the Oriental Churches begun by Jowett,
formed plans for educational work in the interest of those Churches.
Athens was occupied by the Protestant Episcopal Church of
America ; and the Church Missionary Society chose the Island of
Syra, and also Smyrna — which, though in the Turkish dominions,
was one of the most important Greek centres in the East. In
1829, a Prussian who had been sent by the Basle Society to Corfu,
P. A. Hildner, was taken over by the Society, and stationed at
Sj'ra ; and there he lived and worked for fifty-four years. He
carried on a school called the Pajdagogion, and gave a sound
Scriptural education to hundreds of Greeks. In 1831, J. A.
and Asia Jetter, wlio had been invalided from Bengal, was sent to Smyrna ;
and in 1835 he was joined by Peter Fjellstedt, a Swede, who also
had been invalided from India, having been with Rhenius in
Tinnevelly. These two travelled all over Asia Minor, and the
latter afterwards in Bulgaria, distributing Scriptures and tracts,
and preaching the simple Gospel of Christ as opportunity offered
In times of plague and cholera, which then alternately ravaged the
Levant, they gave themselves assiduously to the care of the poor
and sick. For a time they had both Greek and Turkish schools
at Smyrna ; but the hostility of Greek priests and Turkish
mullahs was successful in getting them closed, and in 1840 both
brethren were recalled to England, and retired.! In 1842 the
Smyrna Mission was reopened by J. T. Wolters, one of the
Basle men who, like Pfander, Hoernle, and others, had been
driven out of Persia by the Russians,! and had joined the
Church Missionary Society.
and Egypt. Two of the Oriental Churches, the Coptic and the A])yssinian,
the Society was now making special efforts to influence. In 1825,
five Basle men, Samuel Gobat, Christian Kugler, J. P. T. Lieder,
Theodor Milller, and W. Kruse, were sent to Egypt; the first two
s. Gobat. with an eye to Abyssinia whenever the way opened. Gobat
(afterwards Anglican Bishop in Jerusalem) was a remarkable man.
His fascinating autobiography gives a delightful and ingenuous
account of his earlier years. § He came from Basle to Islington,
just when the College was opened, || and though he was only in
* See p. 227. His journals are printed at great length in the Register, and
are deeply interesting.
t Jetter was the father of Mrs. Greaves of the C.E.Z.M.S.
t See p. 313.
§ Samuel Gobat : H>s Life and Work. London : Nisbet, 1884.
II "I enjoyed," says Gobat, "the society of several of the missionary
students, especially Cockran, afterwards Archdeacon of Rupert's Land, and
Maori ^ Australian^ Cree 351
England a few months, the Committee acquired a high idea of Part IV.
both his abihty and his devotion. Coming from the Jura, his 182-4-41.
vernacular was French, but he knew German and English, Latin, C^hap. 24.
Greek, and Hebrew, and he was studying Arabic and Ethiopic.
Going to Egypt, and thence to Palestine, is a very simple thing
now, but it was not so then. The p.irty were forty-nine days
getting fi-om Marseilles to Malta ; and when Gobat and Kugler
visited Jerusalem to consult with some Abyssinians there (who all
died of the plague shortly after), they had to return from Jaffa to
Damietta in an open boat.
The work in Egypt was carried on for more than thirty years,
chiefly by Lieder, who died at Cairo in 1865. He and his brethren Lieder
itinerated all over the Delta, into the Fayum, and up the Nile into '" ^gypt.
Nubia, selling and distributing Scriptures and tracts, among
both Christians and Mussulmans, but more especially the former.
The Coptic Patriarch and priests were generally friendly, though
those of the Greek Church were not. Schools also were set on
foot ; and, in particular, a Boys' Boarding School at Cairo, which
in 1842 was changed into a Theological Seminary for the training
of the Coptic clergy. Many of them received in it from Lieder
pure and Scriptural teaching which they could have had in no
other way ; and one of the students afterwards became Abuna
(Archbishop) of the Abyssinian Church. Linguistic w^ork was also
done at Cairo as well as at Malta. Lieder revised the Coptic and
the Arabic New Testament for the S.P.C.K. ; and he translated
into Arabic the Homilies of St. Chrysostom, "and some useful
works by Macarius, whose authority is much respected by the
Coptic Church, but from whose principles that Church has
grievously declined." '■'
Abyssinia had been long in the thoughts of the Church
Missionary Society. The acquisition by the Society of a valuable
MS. of part of the Old Testament in Ethiopic, the ecclesiastical
language of the Abyssinian Church, in 1817, led to the Committee's The Abys-
requesting Samuel Lee t to prepare a brief history of that Church ; church,
which historical sketch is printed in the Appendix to the Eeport
of 1818. Then the purchase, by Jowett in 1820, of Abu Eumi's
MS. version of the Bible in Amharic,]: the vernacular of the
country, increased the interest. Not till 1830, however, did Gobat Gobat to
succeed in getting to Abyssinia. The account of his voyages down Abyssinia,
and across the Eed Sea, in open Arab vessels crowded with
pilgrims, with only polluted water to drink, and sometimes none
at all, and he himself suffering, now with ophthalmia, and now
W. Williams, afterwards Arclideacon [and Bishoii] in New Zealand. But
my chief associate was the gifted and deeply pious Mr. C. Friend, who died in
India on the very threshold of his career." lh\d., p. 60.
* Annual Report, 18-4.5, p 48.
f The Society's learned 'protege, who was afterwards Professor of Arabic at
Cambridge. See p. 120.
+ See p. 227.
352 Greek^ Copt^ Abyssinian, Zulu^
Part IV. with dysentery, is very interesting but very painful reading.*
1824-41. B^t still more interesting, and still more painful, are the
Chap. 24. g^ccounts, by himself and his companions and successors, of
the Abyssinian Church. How low a nominally Christian Church,
still holding the ancient Creeds, can descend in corruption
of both doctrine and practice, would scarcely be believed,
except on the united testimony of intelligent and trustworthy
men; men, moreover, who were actuated by no mere iconoclastic
zeal, who remembered the significant cautions of the Committee
not to rail against unaccustomed usages and ritual, f and who, as a
matter of fact, constantly tried to find common ground between
themselves and the priests and monks they conversed with. Yet
thev did find a few " pious, conscientious, upright, and self-deny-
ing priests, notwithstanding their ignorance of the way of salva-
tion " ; and some who were " well acquainted with the Bible, and
with the writings of the Eastern Fathers of the first four centuries,"
but " subtle and acute reasoners who delighted in metaphysical
niceties rather than in practical investigations." \ In fact, they were
often encouraged by their intercourse with the people. "Many
Abyssinians changed many of their views for the better ; and
I observed," says Gobat, "numerous individuals on whom the
truths of the Gospel had made a deep impression, though I only
knew four or five whom I could consider as truly converted." §
Gobat himself became so widely respected, that the Abyssinians
seriously thought of electing him Bishop.
But his health failed, and he was compelled to leave, after
burying his companion Kugler, who died of wounds caused by the
Gobat in bursting of his gun. Gobat returned to Europe, and when his
England, j^g^^^j^ ^^,^^ rcstored, started again for Abyssinia. Here is his
account of ths "valedictory dismissal" by the Committee in
1833 :—
" I -went to Salisbury Squai'e, where many friends were assembled.
After a short prayer, the too humble Edward Bickersteth, who had been
appointed to deliver the instruction, rose. ' My dear friends,' he simply
said, * I feel altop,ether unfit and unworthy to give an instruction to our
brother Gobat, and am conscious that we all need his instruction. I
will now request him to impart it to us before he takes liis leave.' I was
thunderstruck ; but crying to God for help, I began to address my
superiors, the Committee and the meeting, scarcely knowing what I was
to say. I never knew, in fact, what I did say ; I only remember thanking
God afterwards for not permitting me to be confounded." ||
* One voyage, a little later, is thus described : — "We found the boat laden
with ghee or butter in large jars, and a large number of Negro and Abyssinian
pilgrims. Each passenger had his place measured, about five feet and a half
long by two feet broad, over the tops of the jars, or rather between them ;
Q,\\i\. ill this disarjreeaUe position we Itad to ahicle twenty-one days, exposed to
the burning sun. The excessive crowding, contact with our neighbours, and
the invasions of their minute and all too numerous attendants, effectually
banished rest." — S. Golat, p. 154.
t See p. 226. t ^- Oohat, pp. 118, 120.
§ Uid., p. 122. II Ibid,., p. 160.
Maori^ Australian^ Cree -^53
This time Gobat took a wife out with him, a Swiss. The Part IV.
narrative of their travels and sufferings is touching in the extreme. 1824-41.*
Gobat was ahnost continuously ill, and at last he was forced to Chap. 24.
retire altogether.
The next missionaries in Abyssinia were C. Isenberg and isenberg,
C. H. Blumhardt, and they were joined in 1837 by J. L. Krapf ; hiX
and subsequently J. J. Mlihleisen also was sent out. All four ^""^pf-
were Basle men. Isenberg and Blumhardt afterwards laboured
many years in India. Mlihleisen retired, and took the name of
Arnold; and " Mlihleisen -Arnold " became in after years a well-
known clergyman in Cape Colony, and a recognized authority on
Mohammedan questions Krapf s labours and sufferings in
Abyssinia and the adjoining kingdom of Shoa form one of the
most thrilhng chapters of missionary history. The people of
Shoa professed the Christian faith hke Abyssinians, but the state
of the Church was worse than ever there. Polygamy prevailed,
and the grossest immorahty ; and the " Christian " king had five
hundred wives.
It was Eomanist intrigues that ultimately put an end to the
Mission. French priests and travellers on three separate occa-
sions procured the expulsion of the missionaries. To one of these
Krapf had showed much kindness ; which kindness was rewarded,
not only by one of these hostile intrigues, but also by the publica-
tion of a book in which the Frenchman embodied many results of
Krapf 's researches without a word of acknowledgment. The book,
indeed, contained some items of information which were certainly
more original as to their source. " Monsieur Krapf," one day said
the intending author, "we must assert that we have seen the
sources of the Ha wash." " When I replied," writes Krapf, "that
this would not be true, as we had not seen them, he rejoined
with a smile, ' Oh, we must be i)Mloso])hcs ! '" An account of the
river sources in question accordingly ajopeared in the "philoso-
pher's " veracious narrative.
In one sense the Abyssinia Mission did not die. It developed
into another and greater enterprise. In Shoa Krapf met with the
Galla tribes, who were Heathen ; and in view of his desire to work
amongst them, the Committee, in 1841, separated Abyssinia from
the " Mediterranean Mission," and headed it in the Annual Eeport
" Abyssinia or East Africa Mission." In the following year, the .<East
name of Abyssinia was dropped, and his last attempt in Shoa was Africa."
called the " East Africa Mission," two years before what we
understand by the term commenced at Mombasa.
II. The Zulu.
South Africa was one of the earliest fields to which European South
missionaries carried the Gospel. First, the Moravians, in the African
middle of the eighteenth century. Then, at the beginning of this '^'^^'°"^-
century, the London Missionary Society, the Wesleyans the
VOL. I. A a
354 Greek ^ Con\ Abyssinian^ Zulu^
Part IV. Glasgow Society (afterwards Free Church of Scotland), the French
1824-41. Protestant Mission, the Berlin and Ehenish Societies/'' All these
i^ip^' • were at work at the date of Queen Victoria's accession, among
Hottentots, Fingoes, Griquas, Kafirs (then written Caffres),
Bosjesmans (or Bushmen), Bechuanas, Basutos, &c., and at many
stations considerable results had been achieved ; but the trouble-
some wars between the colonists and the Kafirs had much
interfered with the work in some parts. i The famous Lovedale
Industrial Institution had been started by the Scotch Mission.
Eobert Moffat was just then in England, after twenty years'
labours, delighting the Christian public with his thrilhng narra-
tives. Among the Zulus (then written Zoolahs), two Missions
were just being established ; one by the American Board of
Missions, the other by the Church Missionary Society.
All n It was Captain Allen Gardiner, E.N., afterwards so well known
appeais^to ^^^1' liis heroic enterprise and tragic death at Tierra del Fuego, who
c.M.s. called attention to the Zulus. In 1834 he visited Dingarn, the
great chief of the nation, the predecessor of Cetewayo, and
obtained leave from him for missionaries to go to his people ;
and then came to England, and earnestly begged the Society to
start a Mission there. He was one of the speakers at the Anni-
versary of 1836 ; and in many other ways his zeal and fervour
were exercised to arouse sympathy with the fierce Heathen of
Zululand. The result was an offer of service from the Eev.
F- Owen Francis Owen, Curate of Normanton, a Cambridge graduate in
land. lionours ; and he, with his wife and sister, sailed on Christmas
Eve in that year. The Instructions of the Committee to him \
are very interesting, and exhibit strikingly the beautiful spirit that
actuated William Jowett, then the Clerical Secretary. The
Mission was to be on what may be called New Zealand lines.
Agriculture and cattle-breeding were to be undertaken along with
preaching and teaching ; but the over-secularity that had marked
the earlier efforts among the Maoris was to be avoided. In
choosing the locahty for a station, three things were to be sought
for, — salubrity, for health's sake ; security for life and property ;
scope for ready and frequent intercourse with the people.
Mr. Owen and his party went out with Captain Gardiner. On
* The S.P.G. had sui^plied a few clergymen to minister to the colonists,
but in 1837 had only one on its roll. Digi'st, p. 272.
t The outrages committed on the CafJres by the white colonists — chiefly
Dutch, but some English also — aroused the indignation of Fowell Buxton and
the other friends of Africa who had lately won their great victory in the
abolition of West Indian Slavery (see p. 344). The result was a despatch by
Clharles Grant (the younger; afterwards Lord Glenelg ; the excellent head of
the India Office in 1831-3;-!, see p. 273), now Colonial Secretary, — which Buxton
characterized as " most noble " and "most admirable," and as "about the
first instance of a strong nation acting towards the weak on the principles of
justice and Christianity" (Life of Buxton, pp. 310, ;-t22). In these South
African matters, Buxton was much guided by Dr. Philip, the very able and
experienced head of the L.M.S. Missions at the Cape.
X Printed in Appendix to Report of 1837.
Maori ^ Australian^ Cree 355
their arrival at Cape Town, a Cliurch Missionary Association for Part IV.
the Colony was formed, the Governor, Sir B. D' Urban, presiding 1^24-11.
at the inaugural meeting. Then they went on to Port Natal, and ^"P' '
Mr. Owen, after a trying journey across country, arrived at
Dingarn's town on August 19th, 1837, and on the next day,
Sunday, addressed the chief and his people at length, proclaiming
the true God and His laws, with an outline of the Gospel. The
mission station was fixed on a hill near the capital, Unkunkinglove,
and there Mr. Owen and his family settled in October. The
American Mission, which was there before him, was settled in
another part of the country. Owen's journals are very curious
and interesting ; and Dingarn reminds one much of King Mtesa of
Uganda. On one occasion, Owen asked for certain things to be
done quickly. " Why such a hurry? " said the chief. " Because
life is short." " How can that be, since you say we are all to
w^ake up again ? " — referring to the general resurrection.
But within four months all was at an end. A large party of Perils and
Boers came to Dingarn to treat with him for settling in the
country. Without a moment's warning, the whole of that party, sixty
Dutchmen and their native followers, were massacred. Then the
native girls who had been given to Mrs. Owen as servants charged
her and her husband with speaking against the chief — though
their conversations were in English, which the girls did not
understand. This put their lives in imminent peril ; but ulti-
mately they were sent out of the country. They retired, as did
also the American missionaries, to Port Natal ; and finding a
vessel about to proceed to Algoa Bay, they all sailed in her.
Captain Gardiner and his family, who had settled near the coast
at a place he had named Berea, left at the same time. Terrible
fighting ensued between the Boers and the Zulus ; and the feud
continued for many years.
In the meanwhile, the Society, ignorant of the break-up of the
Mission, had sent out a lay agent, W. Hewetson, and a surgeon,
R. Philips, to join Owen. Unwilling to return to England, the
party resolved to try and get to Mozika, in Bechuanaland, eight
hundred miles inland from Grahamstown, a station that had been
occupied, and abandoned, in succession, by the French Protestant
Mission, and by another band from the American Board; and
they actually reached the place. But the Society at home had
been informed that the French Mission intended re-occupying it ;
and instructions were therefore sent to Mr. Owen to return with End of the
his party to England. And thus ended the first and only enter- "^'^^'o"-
prise of the Church Missionary Society in South Africa. In 1859,
the S.P.G. began w^ork in Zululand, and it still suj)ports the
Mission there under the Bishop.
III. The Maori.
We left New Zealand at the point where, after years of patient
labour and distressing trials, the dawn of a brighter day was
A a 2
356
Greek, Copt^ Abv.sslxiax, Zulu,
Part IV.
182-4-41.
0 hap. 24.
New Zea-
land : the
brothers
Williams.
Fruits at
last.
Baptisms.
beginning to appear. William Williams joined his brother Henry
in 1826, and then began the forty years' miited work of the two
leading evangelists — par nohile fratrum — of the Maori race. But
heavy clouds came with the dawn. In 1827 the Wesleyan station
at Whangaroa was destroyed by hostile Natives, and the members
of that Mission were obliged to leave the island. In the following
year, the great chief Hongi died. Cruel savage as he was, he had
always befriended the missionaries, and when dying he exhorted
his people to protect them. Indeed he never would take the life
of a white man, despite the shocking outrages perpetrated on his
race by escaped convicts and other reckless adventurers who
landed from time to time. But his illness and death and the
confusion that ensued, put the Mission in imminent peril ; and
they sent away all books, stores, &c., that could possibly be spared,
by a vessel just sailing for Sydney. As for themselves, and their
wives and children, they resolved to cling to their posts to the
last. " When the natives," wrote William Williams, " are in our
houses, carrying away our things, it will be time for us to take to
our boats." Nay, hearing of two leading tribes preparing for war,
Henry WiUiams hastened to the place where the two bands of
warriors were encamped and awaiting the signal for battle, hoisted
a white flag between them, persuaded them to remain quiet till
after the Ea-tapu (Sunday), held a service for them all on that
day, and on the Monday succeeded in making peace between them.
In all missionary history there is no more thrilhng incident than
this, which led to what was called the Peace of Hokianga,
March 24th, 1828.-
Meanwhile, many signs appeared that the patient teaching of
the Word of God was not fruitless. It will be remembered that
the first baptism, of the dying chief Eangi, had taken place in
1825. Another man, Euri-ruri,) showed unmistakable tokens of
the working of divine grace in his heart ; but he fell sick and died
without baptism. Many of the Natives had learned to read ; and
in 1827, the arrival from Sydney of some books in their own
tongue (containing Gen. i.-iii., Exod. xx., Matt, v., John i., the
Lord's Prayer, and some hymns) caused the utmost excitement
and dehght. "We have had," wrote one of the missionaries,
" dying testimonies ; now we can bless God for living witnesses."
Some of the people began to ask that their children might be
baptized, though hesitating, or not sufficiently instructed, to take
the decisive step themselves ; and in August, 1829, four children
of a ferocious chief named Taiwhanga were publicly admitted to
the Church, together with the infant son of William Wilhams.
The missionaries little dreamed that that infant son, sixty-six
years after, would be consecrated third Bishop of Waiapu! But
six months after, on February 7th, 1830, the first public baptismal
* The whole narrative is given in Carleton's Life of Henry Williams (Auck-
land, 1874), p. 69.
f Written at the time " Dudi-dudi."
Maori ^ Australian^ Cree 357
service for adults was held in New Zealand ; and one of the candi- Part IV.
dates received into the Church that day was Taiwhanga himself, to ^^^^^
whom was given the name of Eawiri (the native form of David). ^^- ■
An outpouring of the Spirit upon the people followed : many
came to the missionaries in deep conviction of sin ; classes and
prayer-meetings were arranged ; more hooks came from Sydney,
containing portions ot the Gospels and 1st Corinthians, and of the
Prayer-book and Catechism, and were eagerly devoured ; and in
the midst of it all came Samuel Marsden, on his sixth visit. Who Marsden's
can describe the old man's joy ! At the very time, on Sunday, ^°^"
March 14th, when a Maori congregation, in his presence, joined
in the Church service, savage lighting was going on only two miles
off. " At one glance," he wrote, " might be seen the miseries of
Heathenism and the blessings of the Gospel ! "
During this time the missionaries at work, besides the brothers a goodly
Williams, had all, except one (Yate=''-), been lay agents, though nfission-
some of these had been under training for a time at Islington, aries.
There were, in 1830, John King, one of the two original settlers
(Hall had lately retired to New South Wales, after several years'
good work), J. Kemp, G. Clarke, R. Davis, J. Hamlin (the first
Ishngton student), C. Baker, from England; and J. Shepherd,
W. Fairburn, and W. Puckey, from New South Wales. But the
Eev. Alfred N. Brown (also one of the first batch of Ishngton
students, but ordained by the Bishop of London), had just arrived.
In the next twelve years the following were (among others) sent
out : T. Chapman, J. Matthews, J. A. Wilson, J. Morgan, B. Y.
Ashwell, Eev. E. Maunsell (B.A., Trin. Coll., Dublin), Eev.
E. Taylor (M.A., Queens', Camb.), 0. Hadfield (Pemb. Coll.,
Oxford), Eev. E. Burrows, and S. M. Spencer ; and G. A.
Kisshng, the Basle man whose health had failed in West Africa,
was transferred to New Zealand in 1841, after ordination by the
Bishop of London. All these did good service — some of them, it
may be truly said, splendid service — for many years ; and several
of the laymen were afterwards ordained. Most of them never
once returned to England. It is a fact worth noting that a
surgeon, who may be called the Society's first medical missionary, The first
Mr. S. H. Ford, went out in 1836 ; and the Committee's Instruc- mfssufn-
tions to him are very interesting. But he withdrew after four ary.
years. Here it may be mentioned that the first death in the New
Zealand Mission in twenty-seven years occurred on February 1st,
1837, when Mrs. E. Davis entered into rest, deeply lamented.
* Mr. Yate was an able man, and much valued ; and when he visited
England in 1834-5 he became popular throughout the country. On his way
back, some charge was brought against him at Sydney, and as he declined
investigation, he was inhibited by Bishop Broughton. The Society then dis-
connected him ; whereupon he returned to England, and published his
grievances. So popular a man had a large following ; and the Committee
have never in any matter had greater trouble than in this. Pressure was
brought to bear on them from all parts of the country ; but Yate was not
I'einstated.
358
Greek ^ Copr^ Abyssinian, Zulu,
Part IV.
1824-41.
Chap. 24.
Extension.
A type of
Uganda.
Three
visitors :
Charles
Darwin,
Bishop
Broughton
The second was a very sad one. The Eev. J. Mason was drowned
in crossmg a river, in January, 1843.
Hitherto the Mission had not gone far from the shores of the
i3ay of Islands ; but Henry Wilhams now planned extension, and
in the next few years new stations were planted at Waimate and
Kaitaia, in the north ; then in the Hot Lakes district ; then on
the Waikato Eiver ; then on the Bay of Plenty. In 1839 two
still more important steps were taken. William Williams moved
to the East Coast, into the country which afterwards formed the
diocese of Waiapu, and took up his abode at Turanga, on Poverty
Bay, where the town of Gisborne now stands ; and Octavius Hadfield
settled at Otaki, in the south, now in the diocese of Wellington.
Both these good men, long afterwards, became Bishops in the
very territories in which they had been the pioneers of the
Gospel. Some of these extensions were due to the zeal of
Maori converts, many of whom showed real earnestness in
spreading the faith to distant tribes. The detailed narratives,
of travel, of the preaching of Christ, of the true conversion of
soul after soul, of the examples of Christian life shown by the
Natives, are of exceeding interest. Nothing in the modern history
of the Uganda Mission, — which in so many ways resembles that
of the New Zealand Mission — is more thrilling, or affords more
signal illustrations of the power of the Holy Ghost. W. Williams
had completed and revised the Maori New Testament and Prayer-
book, and many thousands of copies had been printed and
sold. In 1840, the year when New Zealand became a British
Colony, there w^ere thirty thousand Maori attendants on public
worship.
Before this, how^ever, the Mission had received three important
and interesting visits. In 1835, H.M.S. Beagle, then on its
famous scientific voyage round the world, appeared off the coast,
and Charles Darwin, then a young naturalist, visited the mission
station at Waimate, where William Williams, Davis, and Clarke
w^ere at work. Viewing with admiration the external scene
presented, the gardens, farmyard, cornfields, &c., he wrote,
" Native workmanship, taught by the missionaries, has effected the
change. The lesson of the missionary is the enchanter's wand.
I thought the whole scene admirable. . . . And to think that
this was in the centre of cannibalism, murder, and all atrocious
crimes ! . . . I took leave of the missionaries wdth thankfulness
for their kind welcome, and with feelings of high respect for their
gentlemanlike, useful, and upright characters. It would be difficult
to find a body of men better adapted for the high office which they
fulfil." '■'-
A second visit was from Bishop Broughton. Australia was
' separated from the diocese of Calcutta in 1836, and Archdeacon
* Journal of Researches into the Natural History and Geology of the Countries
V'sited during the Voyage of H.M.S. " Beagle" round the World. By Charles
Darwin. M.A., F.R.S.'
Maori ^ Australian, Cree 359
Broughton, of Sydney, was appointed Bishop of the new diocese. Part IV.
He was the first and only " Bishop of AustraHa," the title being ^^^l^
altered to " Sydney " when other dioceses were formed out of his. J_
At the request of the C.M.S. Committee- he visited New Zealand
in 1838, " though at much personal inconvenience," ordained Mr.
Hadfield, and confirmed several candidates, but fewer than there
would have been but for an outbreak of influenza among the
Natives, and the Bishop's inability, for want of time, to visit more
than three stations. On Christmas Day he preached at Paihia, not
far from the spot where Marsden had preached the first Christian
sermon in New Zealand exactly twenty-four years before.! His
report to the Society bore high testimony to the reality of the
work and the character of the agents, while faithfully pointing out
features susceptible of improvement, and begging for a large
increase of the staff. 4
In the same year another bishop appeared, a French Eomanist,
with two priests. This was not one of our " three interesting
visits," for they stayed; and stayed, it need scarcely be added,
not in the still Heathen districts, but close to the existing
Mission. Here is another feature in which New Zealand is like
Uganda— and with still more unhappy results, as will appear
hereafter. .
The third of the three visits — but the second in order of tmie, Samuel
1837— was from Samuel Marsden. The old veteran, for the ^^^[^^t^" =
fourteenth time, sailed across the twelve hundred miles between visit.
Sydney and the Bay of Islands, to pay his seventh and last visit
to the land and the people for whom he had done so much. At
the age of seventy-two, bowed down by bodily infirmities, he
was carried in a litter from station to station in the north by
Maori bearers who loved him, and then went on by sea to the
east and the south. Wherever he went, he was met by crowds of
Natives, who journeyed long distances to see the benefactor of
their race. With humble, lowly thankfulness the aged samt
gazed on the results of his labours and his prayers ; and "with
paternal authority and affection, and with the solemnity of one
who felt himself to be standing on the verge of eternity, he gave his
parting benedictions to the missionaries and the converts." § One
night on deck, wrote Mr. A. N. Brown (June 8th, 1837),—
" He spoke of almost all his old friends liaving preceded him to
the Eternal World— Komaine, Newton, the Milners, Scott, Robuison,
Buchanan, Goode, Thomason, Legh Richmond, Simeon. He then
alluded in a very touching manner to his late wife. They had
passed, he observed, more than forty years of their pilgrimage ni
company; and he felt their separation more severely as the months
rolled on. I remarked that their separation would be but for a short
period longer. 'God grant it,' was his reply; and then, lifting his
* See p. 411. t See p. 209.
+ Printed in the Appendix to the Report of 1840.
8 Minute of C.M.S. Committee on death of S. Marsden.
360 Greek^ Copt^ Abyssinian^ Zulu^
Part IV. eyes toward the moon, which was peacefully shedding her beams on
1824-41. the sails of our gallant bark, he exclaimed, with intense feeling —
Chap. 24.
' Preijare me, Lord, for Thy right hand j
Then, come the joyfid day ! ' "
His death. Jt was indeed " but for a short period." He returned to Sydney
in August, after six months' absence, and on May 12th, 1838, at
Paramatta, he entered into rest.
Two of his Fifty-five years after, in 1893, his grand-daughter. Miss Hassall,
dlml?' opened her own house near Sydney as the " Marsden Training
Home " for lady missionaries in connexion with the New South
Wales Church Missionary Association ; and the first student ad-
mitted to the Home was her own niece, Samuel Marsden's great-
granddaughter, x\my Isabel Oxley, who in 1896 went to China as a
missionary of the Church Missionary Society. " The children of
Thy servants shall continue, and their seed shall be established
before Thee."
IV. The Australian Black.
Australian " -"- ^^^e Seen the miserable Africans first come from the holds
Aborigines of slave-sliips ; but they do not equal, in wretchedness and misery,
the New Hollanders. They are the poorest objects on the
habitable globe." So wrote Mr. George Clarke, afterwards so
well known in New Zealand, and father of Archdeacon E. B.
Clarke, in 1823. He had been sent out by the Society to join the
New Zealand Mission, but on his way thither he was detained at
Sydney by Samuel Marsden, and commissioned to take charge of
an institution projected by the New South Wales Government for
the instruction of Australian Aborigines, or (as they were then
called) New Hollanders. This had been a scheme of Governor
Macquarie's as far back as 1814, but it was only now about to be
carried out. There was to be a farm, workshops, schools, and a
church ; though how far these designs were fulfilled does not
appear. The place, about twelve miles from Paramatta, was
called Black Town. The exigencies of New Zealand, however,
compelled Marsden, after a few months, to send Clarke on thither ;
but a year or two later, W. Hall, who, it will be remembered,
was one of the first two settlers sent out, returned to Sydney, and
took charge of the institution for a time,
a'^ie^dto In 1825 an Auxiliary Church Missionary Society was estab-
from ' lished at Sydney, with Samuel Marsden as President, and Sir
Sydney, Thomas Brisbane, the Governor, as Patron. Its primary object
was to undertake work among the Aborigines or Blacks. An
virgent appeal was sent to the Parent Society in England for
missionaries; and SirT. Brisbane promised ten thousand acres for
a mission station and farm.''= Two places were fixed on, Bon Bon
and Limestone Plains, near each other, and both about 120 miles
* Similar grants were made to the London and Wesleyan Missionary
Societies. Both began work, but both relinquished it soon after.
AIaori^ Australian^ Cree 361
from Sydney. A clergyman, J. Norman, and a schoolmaster. Part IV.
J. Lisk, were sent out by the Society, both of whom had been at IP'^'^},
Sierra Leone, but had failed to stand the African chmate. ^ ^^n^- •
Neither of them, however, actually got into the work. Norman
was sent by the Governor to Tasmania as a chaplain for convicts,
and Lisk was obliged to return home on account of his wife's
health. In 1830, the Home Government, by Sir George Murray and by the
and Lord Goderich, successive Colonial Secretaries, approached ^ent!"'
the Society, offering a grant of £500 a year for the support of two
missionaries ; and in the following year two clergymen, J. C. S.
Handt and W. Watson, were sent out, and subsequently another
clergyman, J. Giinther,''= and a farmer, W. Porter. Handt and
Watson were appointed to a Government station for the The Mis-
Aborigines at Wellington Valley, two hundred miles inland from ^'°"-
Sydney. In 1836, Handt was sent to Moreton Bay, on the
coast four hundred miles north of Sydney, where there was a
penal settlement, and whence other Aborigines could be reached ;
and Giinther succeeded him at Welhngton Valley. For several
years regular reports were presented by the missionaries to the
New South Wales Government, and printed at Sydney. The
extracts from these and from the journals of the brethren, printed
in the C.M.S. Eeports, give a vivid account of the terrible de-
gradation of the Aborigines — bad enough by nature, but rendered
far worse by the shocking wickedness of the white men. Never-
theless, in the teeth of almost unparalleled difficulties, good work
was done. Black children were taken into the mission-hoiises its results,
and taught to read and write, proving really intelligent ; and
hundreds of adults, notwithstanding their nomadic habits,
gathered under Christian instruction, joined in Christian worship,
and gave many signs of great improvement. It is not, however,
recorded that any were actually baptized. A good beginning was
made in linguistic and translational work. A vocabulary and
grammar were prepared, and translations of three Gospels,
portions of Genesis and the Acts, and a large part of the Prayer-
book.
Some differences ensued, however, between the Society and the its end.
New South Wales Government ; and at length, in the Annual
Eeport of 1842, the following paragraph is found : — " No prospect
being left of surmounting the difficulties from different sources in
which this Mission has for some time past been involved, con-
sistently with the terms on which, at the instance of Her
Majesty's Government, the Mission was undertaken- by the
Society, the Committee have been reluctantly compelled to
relinquish it." And relinquished it was, accordingly, by the
Society, though one or more of the missionaries still carried on
work among the Natives, the Government continuing its care of
them. Few persons, either in England or in Australia, are now
* Father of the present Archdeacou Giiuther, of Paramatta.
362
Greek ^ Copt, Abvss/jv/ajv, Zulu,
Part IV.
1824^1.
Chap. 24.
Rupert's
Land Mis-
sion.
Cockran.
Red River,
Indian
Settlement,
Fruits.
An Indian
Appeal.
aware of the fact that the first attempt to preach the Gospel to
the Austrahan x\borigines was made by the Church Missionary
Society ; and it would be with no httle surprise that they would
read the more than one hundred and fifty columns of small type
in which the proceedings of the Mission are detailed in the C'.il/.
Becord of 1834-39.
V. The Cree and the Soto.
The foundation of what was long known as the North-West
America Mission, in 1820-22, has been already mentioned. The
return home of Mr. West in 1823 left Mr. David Jones alone at
theEedEiver; but in 1825, Wilham Cockran, a sturdy North-
umbrian from Chilhngham, went out, having firet received both
deacon's and priest's orders from the Bishop of London. Thus
began what has been well called " a finished course of forty
years," broken only by a few months in Canada ; for Cockran
never returned to England.
The work on the Eed Eiver was among the Cree Indians ; not,
however, neglecting the whites and half-breeds in the employ of
the Hudson's Bay Company. The latter were mostly at Fort
Garry, at the junction of the Assiniboine and Eed Eivers, where
the flourishing city of Winnipeg, capital of the entire North-
West, now stands. Here was what was called the Upper Settle-
ment. The Middle Settlement was a httle lower down the united
river, as it flows northward towards Lake Winnipeg; then the
Grand Eapids, a Httle further; and, a few miles still lower down,
Cockran founded, in 1833, what is still known as the Indian
Settlement, with a view to inducing the wandering Crees to
settle down and cultivate the ground, and thus remain under
regular Christian instruction.
It is difficult now to conceive the isolation and hardships then
endured by the httle missionary band. Their communication
with England was via Hudson's Bay, by the one ship which each
summer sailed to York Fort with a year's provision, and at once
returned before the ice blocked her in. In 1836, she arrived off
York too late to land her cargo, and, after contriving to get the
mail-bags ashore, had to sail back to England, leaving no
supphes to be sent up the Nelson Eiver by the canoes waiting for
them. The missionaries (and the other Europeans too) got their
letters, but nothing else, and were reduced to great straits ; " but,"
wrote Cockran, "we have our Bibles left!" But their long and
patient labours had borne spiritual fruit, and in 1837 there was a
community at the Eed Eiver stations of six hundred baptized
Christians. The Indians had learned to value their " praying-
masters," and when Jones was returning to England in 1838, they
wrote the following letter to the Society : —
" Anffust 1,1838.
"Skrvants of the Great Goj),
" We uncfc! more call to you for help, and hope our cry will
avail. You sent us what you called the Word of God ; we left our
Maori ^ Australian^ Cree 363
hunting-grounds and came to hear it. But we did not altogether Hke Part IV.
it, for it told us to leave off drunkenness and adultery, to keep only one 182-4-41.
wife, to cast away our idols and all our bad heathen ways ; but as it Chap. 24.
still repeated to us that, if we did not, the great God would send us to
the great devil's fire ; by the goodness of God we saw at last it was
true. We now like the Word of God, and we have left off our sins ;
we have cast away our rattles, our drums, and our idols, and all our
bad heathen ways. But what are we to do, our friends '? Mr. Jones is
going to leave vis ; Mr. Cockran talks of it. Must we turn to our idols
and gods again ? or must we turn to the French praying-masters ? We
see three French praying-masters have come to the river, and not one
for us ! What is this, our friends ? The Word of God says that one
soul is worth more than all the world ; surely then, our friends, three
hundred souls are worth one praying-master ! It is not once t)r twice
a week teaching that is enough to make us wise ; we have a bad heart,
and we hate our bad hearts and all our evil ways, and we wish to cast
them all away, and we hope in time, by the help of God, to be able to do
it. But have patience, our friends ; we hope our children will do
better, and will learn to read God's book, so as to go forth to their
country people to tell them the way of life, and that many may be saved
from the great devil's fire."
This touching appeal was at once responded to by the going
forth of J. Smithurst in 1839 ; but, for lack of men, not again
until 1841, when Abraham Cowley, a j)rotecje, of the Eev. Lord Abraham
Dynevor's at Fairford in Gloucestershire, was appointed to the °^^^-
Mission. He was not ordained ; but he was sent via Canada, and
received deacon's orders en route from the Bishop of Montreal,
Dr. G. J. Mountain.''' To get from Canada, however, by Lake
Superior, to Eed Eiver, proved impracticable. The dismal plain.-
and forests of Algoma, through which the luxurious Canadian
Pacific Express now speeds its way, could only then be traversed
with extreme difficulty ; and the young clergyman, finding that
he could get no further, returned as quickly as possible to England,
and was just in time to sail hence by the annual ship direct to
York Fort.
Extension had already begun. When John West first went
out in 1820, he picked up, during his canoe voyage from York to
Eed Eiver, two young Indian boys, and took them with him.
They were the first of their nation to be baptized, by the names
of Henry Budd and John Hope. Both became excellent assis- ^^^
tants ; and in 1840, Budd was sent five hundred miles off, up the
great Saskatchewan Eiver, to open a new station in the Cumber-
land district, which he did at a place called the Pas, afterwards
* There were then only two bishoprics for all British North America, Nova
Scotia and Quebec. But during the lifetime of Bishop Stewart of Quebec, the
Rev. G. J. Mountain, son of a previous Bishop Mountain of Quebec, had been
appointed a Coadjutor-Bishop of Montreal. When Bishop Stewart died, in
1836, Bishop G. J. Mountain succeeded to his jurisdiction, but retained the
title of Bishop of Montreal. When the separate Bishopric of Montreal was
founded in 18.50, Bishop G. J. Mountain assumed the title of his predecessor,
Bishop of Quebec. Unless these facts are carefully borne in mind, the Church
history of Canada is rather confusing.
■' 3^4 Greek^ Copt^ Abyssinian^ Zulu^ Maori^ &c.
ji. Part IV. Devon. Cowley, on his arrival, was sent to Manitoba Lake, and
I ^^^'^^x ^l^sre he founded a station among the Soto or Saulteaux Indians,
lap^^ . gg^^^jj-ig ji^ Fairford after his birthplace. The Sotos proved a far
harder race to influence than the Crees. While Cowley was
sorrowing over his ill-success, Budd was experiencing manifest
blessing ; and when a new missionary, James Hunter (afterwards
Archdeacon), came out, and proceeded to the Pas, he found so
many Crees under instruction that four years later there were
more than four hundred baptized. Another Indian, James
Settee, who had also been a boy under West, was sent still
further afield in 1846, as far as Lac la Eonge, on the " height of
land " or watershed between the rivers that fall into Hudson's
Bay and those that flow northwards and join the great Mackenzie.
Bishop of In 1844, the Mission had the advantage of an episcopal visita-
Montreai's ^-^^^^ Bishop Mountain of Montreal, at the request of the
Society, succeeded in performing the long land journey which
Cowley had been unable to take. Canada is so much better
known now, that the particulars of his journey, as summarized
by Dr. Langtry of Toronto, '■■' will interest not a few : —
" The whole distance involved a journey from Montreal of about
2000 miles, and it was all accomplished either in birch-bark canoes, or
on foot. They paddled up the Ottawa about 3:^0 miles, then made their
way by numerous portages into Lake Nipissing, which they crossed.
Then down the French River into the Georgian Bay (Lake Huron) ; then
for 300 miles they threaded their way through that wonderful Archi-
pelago, containing, it is said, 39,000 islands, to the Sault Ste. Marie.
Thence, after a long portage round the Sault, they rowed across the
entire length of Lake Superior to Fort William ; thence up to Kemenis-
tiquoia ; through the Rainj^ and Wood Lakes ; down the Winnipeg River ;
thence along the shores of tlie stormy Lake Winnipeg to the mouth of
the Red River."
The Bishop was astonished and delighted with what he found
at the Red River stations, and wrote most warmly to the Society.
He confirmed 846 candidates, including a large proportion of
Indians, gave Cowley priest's orders, delivered sixteen addresses in
seventeen days, and then started on his long journey back to
Montreal.
The Red River is now the seat of an Archbishopric ; and there
are eleven dioceses in the North-West Territories. In this
expansion the Society has taken a large share, as will appear
by-and-by.
* Colonial Church Histori''.'< : Eastern Canada. By J. Langtry, M.A.,
D.C.L., Prolocutor of the Provincial Synod of Canada. S.P.C.K., 1892.
FBOM VENN'S ACCESSION TO THE
JUBILEE : 1841-1848.
NOTE ON PAKT V.
This is the shortest of our Parts in regard to the length of time covered,
comprising barely eight years, from the spring of 1841 to the JubileJ
Commemoration, November, 1848, though in one or two chapters the
narrative is necessarily continued a little beyond that epoch. The first
chapter, XXV., combines the Personnel and the Environment, intro-
ducing us to the new Secretary, Henry Venn, and his fellow-workers,
and also noticing various controversies at home, and Missions, Protestant
and Roman, abroad. It is supplemented by two chapters which take up
definite subjects, and in doing so show us more of both the Personnel
and the Environment. Chap. XXVI. describes the relations at the time
of the C.M.S. and the Church, and relates the adhesion to the Society
of the Archbishops and Bishops, the attitude towards it of men like
Blomfield and S. Wilberforce, and its attitude towards the rising
Tractarianism. Chap. XXVII. tells the story of the Colonial and Mis-
sionary Episcopate, and, in particular, of the establishment of the
Colonial Bishoprics Fund, of the New Zealand Bishopric, and of the
Anglican Bishopric in Jerusalem ; also of the Society's controversy with
Bi.shop D. Wilson.
Then follow three chapters on the Missions. India is omitted in this
Part, the history of the work there in the 'forties having been practically
covered in the preceding Part. Chap. XXVIII. gives a full narrative of
the events and controversies of the period in New Zealand, with special
reference to Bishop Selwyn and Sir G. Grey. Chap. XXIX. comprises
several interesting episodes in the history of Missions in Africa, the
story of Crowther, the first Niger Expedition, the origin of the Yoruba
Mission, and Krapf's commencement on the East Coast. Chap. XXX.
takes us for the first time to China, and summarizes the events before
and after the first Chinese War.
The last two chapters of the Part are special ones. Chap. XXXI.
reviews the finances oi the Society, the contributions and the expendi-
ture, during the half-century. Chap. XXXII. describes the Jubilee
Commemoration.
CHAPTEK XXV.
Henry Venn — and Survey of Men and Things.
The Year 1841 an Epoch in Church, in State, in C. M.S. —Henry
Venn — Deaths of Pratt and Coates — The Committee, Vice-
Presidents, Preachers and Speakers — C.M.S. Missions and Mis-
sionaries— Missions of Other Societies — Roman Missions — Contro-
versies at Home : Maynooth, Irish Church Missions, Evangelical
Alliance — Scotch Disruption — C.M.S. and Scotch Episcopal
Church.
" Lo, I have given thee a wise and an understanding heart." — 1 Kings iii. 12.
" Can we find such a one as this is, a man in ivhom the Spirit of God is ?" —
Gen. xli. 38.
'HE year 1841 was an epoch in the history of the State, part V.
an epoch in the history of the Church, and an epoch in 1841-4.8.
the laistory of the Church Missionary Society. Few Chap. 25.
years have had more fateful issues. In the State, the An epoch-
year saw the fall of the Melhourne Government, and making
the commencement of Peel's administration. In that year Mr. ^^^^'
Gladstone became a Minister, and Mr. Cobden entered Parliament, in the
From that year began the great fiscal reforms which have done state,
so much for the material advancement of the nation, culminating
in the Eepeal of the Corn Laws and the establishment of Free
Trade. In 1841, England was engaged in the Afghan and China
wars : if the former did not open Central Asia, it indirectly led, a
few years later, to the conquest of the Punjab ; while the latter
did open to European influence the largest homogeneous popula-
tion in the world. In 1841, the struggle between Turkey and
Egypt issued in the virtual independence of the vassal state. In
1841, the Niger Expedition ascended that great river. In 1841,
David Livingstone went to Africa. In 1841, steam communication
with India via the Ked Sea was organized by the P. & 0.
Company. In 1841, the Prince of Wales was born.
Then turning to the Church : in 1841 appeared the famous in the
Tract XC, the most daring manifesto of the Oxford Movement, in ^^"'"'^^
which John Henry Newman (to adopt the words of the resolution
of the Heads of Houses at Oxford condemning the Tract) " evaded
rather than explained the sense of the Thirty-Nine Articles, and
reconciled subscription to them with the adoption of the errors
368 Henry Venn — and Survey of Men and Things
Part Y. they were designed to counteract." '■•' In 1841, the Colonial
1841-48. Bishoprics Fund was established, which has had a large share in
C lap^ o. extending the Anglican Episcopate over the world. In 1841, the
Bishopric of New Zealand was founded, and Selwyn appointed
first Bishop. In 1841, the Anglican Bishopric in Jerusalem also
was established.
In the Almost all these events, sooner or later, affected the Church
ooety. Missionary Society. But the year was a marked one wdthin the
Society itself. In 1841, the two Archbishops and several Bishops
joined it, on the addition to its Laws and Eegulations of
certain provisions for ecclesiastical difficulties. In 1841 occurred
various events which led to the Yoruba, Niger, and East Africa
Missions ; and the future China Mission was appearing above the
horizon. In 1841, Eobert Noble and H. W. Fox went to India to
start the Telugu Mission. In 1841, the Society, in the face of
all these openings and possibilities, was in the midst of the
greatest financial crisis in its history, the whole of its reserve
funds having been sold out, and a debt of several thousand pounds
being due to the bankers and private friends.
Lastly, in 1841, Henry Venn became Honorary Secretary of
the Society.
The three jS[o name is so identified with the' History of the Church
Vcnns ■ '
Missionary Society as the name of Venn. We found, in our
earlier chapters, the springs of the stream, whose winding and
gradually widening course we have been following from its source,
in the Evangelical Eevival of the Eighteenth Century ; and of that
Eevival, so far as it permanently affected the Church of England,
the First Henry Venn, Vicar of Huddersfield, was perhaps the
chief promoter. It is true that the Eevival was, in its beginnings,
entirely a Church movement. The Wesleys, Whitefield, and all
the other earlier leaders, were clergymen. But the most conspicu-
ous results of their labours — partly, if not principally, through the
Church's own fault — were ultimately seen outside its pale. With
Venn and his more immediate allies it was different. They
preached the same Gospel in the power of the same Spirit, but
they submitted to the restrictions imposed by their parochial
responsibilities, rendered all loyal allegiance to the Bishops, held
* Bishop Philpotts of Exeter, the most advanced and militant High Church-
man on the Bench, said in his Charge : — " The tone of the Tract as respects
our own Church is offensive and indecent ; as regards the Reformation and
our Reformers absurd, as well as incongruous and unjust. Its principles of
interpreting our Articles I cannot but deem most unsound ; the reasoning
with which it supports its principles sophistical ; the averments on which it
founds its reasoning, at variance with recorded facts. ... It is idle to argue
against statements which were not designed for argument, but for scoffing.
... It is far the most daring attempt ever yet made by a minister of the
Church of England to neutralize the distinctive doctrines of oiir Church and
to make us symbolize with Rome." (Quoted in hije of Archbishop Taif,
vol. i. p. 99.)
Hexrv Venn — and Survey of Men and Things 369
tirmly by the Prayer-book, steered a middle course between Part Y.
the Arminianism of Wesley and the ultra-Calvinism of some of lS'il-48.
Whitefield's followers, and gradually built up the new school of ^"^^"
" serious clergy " within the Church, from which sprang the
Church Missionary Society. Then, in the second generation of
Evangelicals, comprising men like Newton, Cecil, Scott, Simeon,
Pratt, and the Milners, we found that John Venn, Eector of
Clapham, son of the First Henry and father of the Second Henry,
was not only the Nestor of the party, but the first chairman of
the new Society, and the author of its original constitution. And
now, in the third generation of Evangelical Churchmen — perhaps
we may say in the third and fourth — reckoning Bickersteth,
Cunningham, and the first Daniel Wilson as representing the
third, and McNeile, Stowell, Close, and Miller, as representing the
fourth — we shall find the Second Henry Venn exercising for thirty
years an unique influence as the Society's Honorary Secretary and
virtual Director.
Henry Venn the younger was born at Clapham on February Henry
10th, 1796. The date is noteworthy, for it was only two days yo^unger?
after Charles Simeon had opened that discussion at the Eclectic
Society which led to the formation of the C.M.S. In 1814 he
went to Queens' College, Cambridge, of which Isaac Milner, Dean At Cam-
of Carlisle, then an aged man, was still President. He came out bridge.
19th Wrangler in ] 818 ; Lefevre (afterwards Sir John Shaw
Lefevre) being Senior, and Connop Thirlwall (afterwards Bishop of
St. David's) also in the list. In the following year he was elected,
like his grandfather, the first Henry Venn, a Fellow of Queens',
and was ordained by the Bishop of Ely. In 1821 he was curate
of St. Dunstan's, Fleet Street, and then began to attend the
Committee meetings of the Church Missionary Society. Only for
two or three years, however ; as in 1824 he went back to Cam-
bridge, and became Tutor at his college — which at this time rose to
be third among the colleges in point of numbers, — and also Proctor
to the University. An interesting circumstance connects him also
with Great St. Mary's. The Vicar was then Mr. Musgrave, after-
wards Bishop of Hereford and Archbishop of York. Musgrave
arranged to start an evening service for the townspeople, — a
great novelty in the University Church, although Simeon had
long ago introduced it, in the teeth of much opposition, at Trinity ;
■ — and appointed Venn to be the new evening lectui'er. Shortly
after, however, Venn moved to Hull, being nominated by W^illiam At Hull.
Wilberforce to the then very unattractive parish of Dry pool.
There he laboured six years, until, in 1834, he was offered by
Daniel Wilson the younger, who had succeeded his father the
Bishop in the Vicarage of Islington, the incumbency of St. John's,
Hollo way. This move brought him back to Salisbury Square,
and he quickly became one of the leading members of Committee.
In 1840, William Jowett resigned his Clerical Secretaryship
and ill the following year his colleague Vores foil )wed his example
VOL. I. B b
At Hollo-
way.
370 Henry Venn — and Survey of Men and Things
Part V. This left the Lay Secretary, Dandeson Coates, sole head of the
1841-48. House.''' The Eev. Eichard Davies was appointed Clerical Secre-
Chap. 25. ^g^j^.y . ,1 jj-^ whom," wrote Venn in after years, " we had a lovely
example of quiet energy, a heavenly spirit, and devoted love to the
cause." i He continued at his post seven years; " but his early
removal from the office prevented the full ripening of excellent
official qualifications." \. No second suitable clergyman was forth-
coming ; and in October 1841, Venn was approached, and
" kindly consented, as a temporary arrangement, to connect him-
H. Venn self officially with the Society, under the designation of Honorary
ofcl'M.^s.' Clerical Secretary j;ro tempore." § He had already been virtually
the Society's leader, particularly in ecclesiastical matters. In
that very year, as we shall see in the next chapter, he had been
in no small degree instrumental, with Lord Chichester, in bringing
about the adhesion of the Archbishops and Bishops to the Society ;
and three or four years earlier, he had drawn up that important
manifesto on the relations of the Society to the Church which for
nearly forty years was printed, with his initials, in the Annual
Eeports. Now he became the official mouthpiece of the Society.
It was at first really supposed to be pro tempore. Venn still
retained his Holloway parish ; besides which, he was only just
recovering — indeed it was doubtful whether he was really recover^
ing — from a long and serious illness. For more than a year, in
1838-9, he had been unable to fulfil any of his ministerial functions.
In May, 1841, his medical adviser urged him to give up his parish
altogethei", and allow his constitution tw^o or three years to regain
strength ; but instead of following this advice, he, five months
after, added to his parochial work the Secretaryship of the Church
Missionary Societ)^ One might say that he did not deserve to
last ; yet, through the goodness of God, he lasted thirty years.
He continued at St. John's till the end of 1845, and then, at last
finding it impossible to fill both posts efficiently, he resigned the
parish — and the income, — and gave himself from that time, body,
soul, and spirit, night and day, all the year round, to the work of
the Church Missionary Society.
What was thought of him after the four years' piro tern, tenure
of the office we may see from a letter on the question which office
c. Baring he sliould retain, written by Charles Baring (afterwards Bishop
Venn'. of Durham) to Venn's brother John (afterwards Prebendary of
Hereford): II—
" I feel so strongly that the duty of a minister of Christ is to preach
the Gospel, that in almost every case I should without a doubt say, Give
up the Secretaryship for pastoral work ; hut yourhrother is an exception
to this, and I feel as confident that if he were to resign his post in
SaUsbury Square he would be relinquishing one of the most imi^ortant
* See p. 252.
f Address at Openiug of new CM. House ; CM. InftJUyencer, 1862, p. 83.
I Ibid. ' § Annual Eeport, 1842.
II Memoir oj Henry Ft 7m, p. 124.
Henry Venn — and Survey of Men and Things 2^']i
spheres for promotins; Christ's kingdom, for which the grace of God Part V.
seems pecuHarly to have suited him. I have now been almost a year 1841-48.
and a half in constant attendance at the Committees, and mnch as I Chap. 25.
value your brother's talents generally, it is only there that his real value
can be seen as a most influential and successful promoter of his Master's
kingdom. His calm judgment and long-sighted views of results, his firm-
ness and settled opinions upon all doctrinal and ecclesiastical matters,
his kindness of heart and manner, his straightforward honesty and
ca.ndour — all these have won him not merely the confidence of the Com-
mittee, but have given him a power with tlKmn and an authority which no
other secretary has before possessed. Again and again have I heard
from the lips of many of the Committee almost the same language, that
they considered it one of the most marked proofs of God's goodness to
the Society, the having raised up such a person at a most critical time,
without whose aid they could scarcely have hoped to have weathered the
storms which were surrounding them."
It must have been a cause of special thankfulness to Josiah
Pratt and Edward Bickersteth, the one at St. Stephen's, Coleman
Street, and the other at Watton, to see such a man in the office
they knew so well. Pratt was an old man when Venn first
joined _23ro tern., and at that very time was arranging to transfer to
other hands his special child, the Missionary JRcgistcr. Bicker-
steth was still in the prime of life, but was just then seriously ill.
He recovered, however, to work for seven years more with
unabated fervour in behalf of many a noble Christian enterprise.
Pratt's home-call came before Venn was permanent Secretary.
He died on October 10th, 1844, full of years and honours — if by Death of
honours we understand the respect and love of all who knew him, ^"^'f^*^
and the blessing vouchsafed upon the Society he had so devotedly
and so wisely served. Two of his funeral sermons were preached
by Bickersteth and Venn. It was in an Appendix to Venn's
Sermon, when published, that the first authentic sketch of the
Society's origin and early history appeared. And the Sermon
itself mentioned the striking circumstance that while Pratt's first
official act w^as his being one of the sixteen clergymen who
formed the Society in 1799, his last one was to second the
resolution in 1841 which modified its constitution and opened the
door for the adhesion of the Heads of the Church.
Hardly had Henry Venn entered upon the full responsibilities
of permanent office, when he lost his able and experienced lay
colleague. Dandeson Coates died on April 23rd, 1846, after a Death of
short illness. In the Eeport presented at the Anniversary, only a coates?°"
few days after, the Committee put on record the "self-sacrifice,
zeal, and extraordinary ability with which he conducted the
business of the Society, and the admirable way in which he
brought the great principles of the Gospel of the Grace of God to
bear upon the discussion of all important questions." His very
ability, however, had sometimes caused difficuky, as indicated in
previous chapters ; "■' but his loss was keenly felt; and it must
* See p. 252.
B b 2
372 Henry Venn — and Survey of Men and Things
Part V.
18-41-t8.
Chaji. 25
Major
Straith
Lay Sec.
Associa-
tion Sees.
New
Clerical
Members
of Com -
mittee.
New Lay
Members.
have been no slight additional trial in the of&ce when his death
was followed, within five months, by the death, after twenty-seven
years' faithful service, of the Accountant, Mr. Northover, who was
thrown from a pony-chaise and died almost immediately. Coates's
successor as Lay Secretary was Major Hector Straith, who had
been Professor of Fortification at Addiscombe, and who held
ofiice thirteen years. He was superior to Coates spiritually, but
not his equal in the conduct of business.
All this time there was another officer in Salisbury Square, who,
however, had no part in the general administration. This was
Mr. G. C. Greenway, the naval officer before-mentioned. •■' He
acted as Association Secretary for London and the neighbourhood,
and also as a central correspondent for the other Association
Secretaries, the number of whom was now increasing. In 1841
there were eight. In 1849 there were thirteen. Among them at
this time were Joseph Eidgeway, afterwards first Editorial
Secretary of the Society ; George Smith, afterwards first Bishop
of Victoria, Hong Kong ; E. W. Foley, afterwards Vicar of All
Saints', Derby ; H. Powell, afterwards Vicar of Blackburn and
Hon. Canon of Manchester ; Bourchier Wray Savile, a well-
known writer ; and Charles and George Hodgson, who worked
Yorkshire so zealously for many years.
Of the clergymen who joined the Committee at this period, and
were appointed members of the Committee of Correspondence, the
most important were Edward Auriol, Edward Hoare, Charles
Baring, and John C. Miller. Auriol, Eector of St. Dunstan's-in-
the-West, soon became by far the most influential clerical member,
and continued so for thirty years, serving as a matter of course on
every important sub-committee. Hoare was Venn's successor
at St. John's, Holloway ; but he moved soon afterwards to
Ramsgate, and ceased attending. Not till nearly thirty years
later did he become the power in the Committee-room which is
now so well remembered. Baring was Eector of All Souls',
Langham Place, and was a valued member until his appointment
to a bishopric in 1856. Miller was Minister of Park Chapel,
Chelsea ; but his removal to the great sphere of his usefulness at
Birmingham soon took him away from Salisbury Square.
The lay members at this time included several men of position
and influence. Captain the Hon. W. Waldegrave (afterwards
Earl Waldegrave), Sir Harry Verney, Sir Walter E. Farquhar,
General Maclnnes, Admiral Sir H. Hope, the Hon. S. E. Curzon,
Lord Henry Cholmondeley, appear in the lists ; and several of
these were regular and very useful members. Colonel Caldwell
joined in 1834, but his continuous membership did not begin till
twenty years later, and then lasted twenty years. James Parish
and E. M. Bird represented the Indian official element, and
both were highly valued. So was John Gurney Hoare, a
^ * See p. 255.
Henry Venn — and Survey of Men and Things 373
regular attendant for nearly thirty years. His brother Joseph Part Y.
was a member for one year in 1849, but his more important ^l^^^"**,^-
services belong to a later period. But above all, among the '^M^-'-
new members of that time, must be named Alexander Beattie,
who joined in 1842, and was still the Nestor of the Society forty-
seven years afterwards. He had before this been a merchant in
Calcutta, and a member of the Society's Corresponding Com-
mittee there. In after years he was a magnate in the railway
world.
But most of these were new men at the period we are reviewing.
The leaders in the Committee-room were, of the clergy, James
Hough, Joseph Fenn, Cornwall Smalley, sen., and (when present)
E. Bickersteth, and of the laity, C. Brodrick, W. A. Garratt, and
J. M. Strachan ; several of whom have been mentioned before.
The Vice-Presidents in 1841 included the Marquis of New vke-
Cholmondeley, the Earls of Galloway, Gosford, and Eoden ;
Viscount Lorton ; Lords Barbara, Bexley, Calthorpe, Glenelg,
and Teignmouth ; Lord Ashley, Sir T. D. Acland, Sir T. Baring,
Sir T. F. Buxton, Sir G. Grey, Sir E. H. Inghs, Sir A. Johnston;
Messrs. W. Evans, H. Goulburn, J. P. Plumptre, and Abel Smith,
M.P.'s ; Mr. Justice Erskine ; Dr. Cotton, Provost of Worcester
College, Oxford ; Dr. Symons, Warden of Wadham ; Dr.
Macbride, Principal of Magdalen Hall ; Dr. Lamb, Master of
Christ's, Cambridge ; and Dean Pearson, of Salisbury. Between
this date and the Jubilee, the following were added : — The Duke
of Manchester, the Earls of Gainsborough and Effingham, and
Earl Waldegrave ; Viscount Midleton, Lord Lurgan, Lord H.
Cholmondeley, Lord Sandon (afterwards Earl of Harrowby), Sir
Peregrine Maitland,'"' and Mr. H. Kemble, M.P. In addition to
these, by the end of this period the number of Bishops who had
joined the Society was thirty-four ; but of them the next chapter
will speak.
The principal names added to the list of Honorary Governors Honorary
for Life, on account of their "essential services to the Society," for Life,
between 1824 and 1848, were the following : — Pratt, Woodrotfe,
Bickersteth, Pearson, and Davies, on their respective retirements
from office ; Baptist Noel, James Hough, and Joseph Fenn, as
leading members of the Committee ; W. Dealtry of Clapham
(afterwards Archdeacon), C. J. Hoare (afterwards Archdeacon),
Charles Bridges, Hugh Stowell, Francis Close (afterwards Dean) ;
Hon. J. T. Pelham (afterwards Bishop of Norwich), and
Chancellor Kaikes ; T. Dealtry of Calcutta (afterwards Bishop of
Madras) ; and Dr. Steinkopff, of the Bil)le Society. No leading
layman was added in this period.
The list of preachers of the Annual Sermon during the period ^^'^1^'^*'^''^
contains notable names. Francis Close's sermon in 1841 has Bride's,
already been noticed.! In 1842, the preacher was Hugh Stowell
* See p. 296. t See p. 289.
374 Hf.nrv Venn — and Survey of Men and Things
Part V. of Manchester, who for so many years stood m the front rank of
1841-48. Exeter Hall orators. His sermon was one of great importance,
Cliap^2o. cQj^-iing just after the adhesion to the Society of the Archbishops
and Bishops ; and we shall see more of it accordingly in the next
chapter. Then followed the Hon. and Eev. W. J. Brodrick,
afterwards Viscount Midleton. In 1844, Bishop Blomfield of
London, one of the new episcopal patrons, preached; and his
words, too, must be quoted hereafter. Then in 1845 came Hugh
McNeile of Liverpool, unquestionably the greatest Evangelical
preacher and speaker in the Church of England during this
century ; but his sermon, in print at least, does scant justice to
his reputation, and calls for no special notice. In 1846, Bishop
Daniel Wilson was in England, and was invited to occupy the
St. Bride's pulpit. He had already done so thirty years l^efore,
when Minister of St. John's, Bedford Eow ; ■'■ and his is the only
name that has ever appeared twice in the famous list. His
sermon also will be noticed in another chapter. In the two
remaining years of the period, the preachers were Charles
Bridges, the well-known expositor, and John Tucker, the Madras
Secretary, who was now at home, and shortly to become a
Secretary in Salisbury Square ; but neither of these need
detain us.
Speakers at Turning to the Annual Meetings, we find several of the leading
Mletings^' speakers of the preceding period again prominent. In the eight
years, 1842-49 inclusive, John Cunningham again spoke four times
(including the Jubilee Meeting), making nineteen times in thirty-
four years. No other man has ever been so frequently put
forward. Stowell spoke three times, McNeile once, Close twice.
Baptist Noel three times, Bickersteth twice. Dr. Marsh once,
Professor Scholefield twice. The brother-Bishops Sumner are
again conspicuous, the Bishop of Winchester speaking three
times, and the Bishop of Chester three times, — the latter also
presiding in 1848 on his elevation to the Primacy, t Bishop
Longley of Eipon, another future Primate, spoke in 1842
and 1844 ; indeed he was almost as frequent a speaker at
various May meetings as his brethren the Sumners. Samuel
Wilberforce, who had spoken as Archdeacon of Surrey in 1840,
appeared again as Bishop of Oxford in 1846, and also, as we
shall see hereafter, at the great Jubilee Meeting in 1848. Sir
Eobert Harry Inglis was a speaker four times in five years. So
far as regards those mentioned before as speaking in the preceding
period. The new names in this period include Lord Ashley
(twice). Lord Sandon, Bishop Spencer of Madras, Bishop Perry of
Melbourne, Montagu Villiers (afterwards Bishop of Carlisle and
Durham), John C. Miller, H. V. EUiott, Dr. Tyng of New York,
* See p. 113.
t Since that time it lias been the custom to invite each new Archbishop of
Canterbury to take the President's chair at the Anniversary next after his
appointment.
asions
Henry Venn — and Survey of Men and Things 375
and Dr. F. Jeiine, Master of Pembroke College, Oxford (after- Part V.
wards Bishop of Peterborough). cf^^lf-
The missionary speakers are again in this period very few : only ^'^^^' "'^"
John Tucker, Weitbrecht, Bernau, H. W. Fox, G. Smith of
China, W. Smith of Benares, Townsend, and E. Jones, the coloured
Principal of Fourah Bay College. Others, however, were put up
at the Evening Meetings ; but these were then gatherings of a
very secondary character, without special attraction, and rarely
well attended.
So much for the i^^i'^onnel of the Society at home during this
period. What of its Missions and missionaries ?
Henry Venn came to Sahsbury Square not only at an epoch in Jlli'lss^'^"^"
the Society's history ecclesiastically, not only at a crisis financially, in iJ
— both which will be described in future chapters, — but also at a
time when the openings in the mission-field were increasing on
every hand. Educational work, mainly with a view to the train-
ing of native teachers and evangelists, was conspicuous for its
development. " In West Africa," says the Eeport of 1841,
" there is the Fourah Bay Institution; in Jamaica, the Normal
School ; in Malta, the new Institution ; in Syra,the High School ;
in Cairo, the Seminary ; in Calcutta, the Head Seminary ; in
Benares, Jay Narain's School ; in Madras, the Institution and
Bishop Corrie's Grammar School ; in Bombay, the Money Institu-
tion ; in Ceylon, the Cotta Institution. They constitute the very
hope of the future usefulness of the Missions ; they require a
large expenditure ; they need also, for their successful superinten-
dence, the most exalted piety." Some of these did not last; the
list suggests reflections on the failure of the best plans ; but
several have lasted to this day, and all are typical of a branch of
missionary work which w^as growing in importance, and calling
for the services of the best men.
The same Eeport mentions appeals before the Committee for
Missions to the Ashantis of West Africa and the Druses of the
Lebanon ; to the Himalaya Valleys, and to the Afghan territories
then (but only temporarily) occupied by British troops. The new
Telugu Mission was just being started. Krishnagar called loudly
for development. The Niger Expedition was about to open up
new territories to evangelization ; the Sierra Leone Mission was
stretching out into the Temne country ; and a year or two later
came the first ordination of an African clergyman, and the com-
mencement of the Yoruba Mission. Krapf in Abyssinia was
already looking southward ; his move to Mombasa nearly co-
incided in time with Townsend's to Abeokuta ; and before the
close of our period the great explorations of Equatorial Afiica had
begun. Above all, the long-closed door into China was on the
point of opening ; before we complete this section of our History
we shall find several China Missions established.
But the supply of missionaries from the Church at home was
376 Hexrv Vi-:xa' — axd Survey of Men and Thixgs
Part V. still miserably inadequate. There was, however, some little im-
1841-48. provement. In a previous chapter it was mentioned that in the
^^^' "^' first forty years of the Society's existence only sixteen University
The mis- men went forth under its auspices. Exactly the same number,
sionaries. sixteen. Went out in the eight years now under review. The
list begins with the two founders of the Telugu Mission, Eobert
Turlington Noble and Henry Watson Fox, of Sidney Sussex,
Umversity Cambridge, and Wadham, Oxford, respectively. It includes also,
'"^"* from Cambridge, W. C. Dudley (Queens'), T. G. Eagland (Corpus,
4th Wrangler, and Fellow), E. L. Allnutt (Peterhouse), E. M.
Lamb (Trinity), M. J. Wilkinson (Trinity), and E. H. Cobbold
(Peterhouse); from Oxford, J. G. Seymer (Ch. Ch.), C. L. Eeay
(Queen's), and George Smith (Magdalen Hall ; afterwards Bishop
of Victoria) ; from Dublin, E. Johnson, T. McClatchie, G. G.
Cuthbert, W. Farmer, and W. A. Eussell (afterwards Bishop of
North China). Of these, Dudley and Eeay went to New Zealand ;
Smith, McClatchie, Cobbold, Farmer, Eussell, to China ; and all
the rest to India.
Islington Of the Islington men of the period, the most notable are Ed-
'"^"' ward Sargent (afterwards Bishop), and J. T. Tucker, of Tinnevelly ;
Henry Baker, jun., of Travancore ; Samuel Hasell, of Bengal
(afterwards Central Secretary) ; James Hunter, of Eupert's Land
(afterwards Archdeacon) ; S. M. Spencer, of New Zealand. Of
the Basle men, we should notice Gollmer, West Africa; Koelle,
West Africa and Turkey ; Eebmann, East Africa ; Erhardt, East
Africa and North India ; Schurr and Fuchs, North India. All
these were at Islington as well as at Basle. Two other men,
whose names come on the list at this time, must be mentioned,
viz., Samuel Crowther, the first of the Society's African clergymen,
ordained from IsHngton in 1843 ; and Samuel Williams, son of
Archdeacon Henry Williams, of New Zealand, who was taken out
by his parents when a few months old in 1822, was ordained in
the country in 1846, and still survives as Archdeacon himself, and
an honorary C.M.S. missionary.
Their Some of thcse brethren, like those of the preceding period,
llrvi«°^ accomplished long periods of service :— Sargent, 47 years, besides
seven as a catechist before ordination; S.Williams (to 1898),
51 ; Crowther, from ordination, 47 ; Spencer, 40 in active work,
and afterwards as e7?ierf^«.s ; Schurr, 36 ; Erhardt, 42 ; Eebmann,
29 without coming home ; Baker, 35 ; Fuchs, 32 ; Eussell, 25,
and seven as bishop ; Noble, 24 without coming home. Others of
the same period had many years too : W. Clark, 30 ; Bilderbeck,
37 ; Bomwetsch, 31.
MTsslonT* -'^^ *^® wider area of Protestant Missions generally, this period
generally, compvises soiiie memorable incidents, some satisfactory progress,
and not a little trial. The India field has already been noticed. ='=
* P. 331.
Henry Venn- — and Survey of Men and Things 377
China is especially conspicuous. It was at this time that several Part V.
of the largest Missions there were begun ; and William Burns, 1841-48,
one of the most heroic of missionaries, went out as the first repre- ^^^' ^"
sentative of the English Presbyterians in 1847. So did W. J.
Boone, the first representative of the Protestant Episcopal Church
of America, afterwards Bishop. That Church had also, a little
earlier, sent John Payne to Liberia, w^ho likewise was sub-
sequently for many years Bishop. In South Africa, Casalis, of
the French Basuto Mission, and Moffat, of the L.M.S., had become
celebrated. In 1841 went forth David Livingstone, and the
Missionary Register reports from time to time the proceedings of
"Mr. Livingston," and in particular, his discovery of Lake
Ngamiin 1849. Elsewhere, the L. M.S. had many trials at this
time. The Eussian Government suppressed the Siberia Mission
in 1840 ; in Madagascar, the great persecution was at its height,
and news of the Native Christians only came at uncertain intervals ;
in the South Seas, John Williams was killed at Erromanga in
1839 ; and in 1842 began the French aggression in Tahiti, which
ultimately drove the Society from the island, and incidentally
brought England and France to the verge of war." On the other
hand, the great Wesleyan triumph in the Fiji Islands, under
John Hunt, belongs to this period ; and so does the success of the
American Board in establishing Christianity in Hawaii. This also
is the date of the heroic enterprise of Captain Allen Gardiner —
whose enforced retirement from Zululand we have already seen f
— in Tierra del Fuego ; but his death did not occur till 1851.
Medical Missions were still in the future ; but Woman's Work was
beginning to extend, particularly in connexion with the Society
for Promoting Female Education in the East, which in 1848 had
about twenty missionaries in India, Ceylon, China, Palestine, and
South Africa.
The period was also one of great activity in Eoman Catholic Roman
Missions. This was mainly due to the energy of a new voluntary
society, not worked by " the Church," although patronized by the
Popes, which had been founded at Lyons in 1822 by "a few
humble and obscure Catholics " (to use their own words), wath
the title of the Institution for the Propagation of the Faith.]: The Lyons
From 1842 onwards, for ten or twelve years, the reports of this
society are summarized in the Missionary Begister, with consider-
able extracts, which are extremely interesting. In the first year
* "I am glad," said Louis Philippe to Lord John Russell, "that our
negotiations on Tahiti terminated favourably. I should have been grieved to
do any injury to your capital, but I was advised to make an attempt on
London, and I should have been successful." Life of Lord Shafteshurii, vol. ii.
p. 91. " Terminated favourably " — because England cared little for a Christian
state whicli was the fruit of Missions, and let the French have their way.
Lord Ashley's "grief and indignation " are expressed in strong terms in his
journal. Ihid., p. 16.
t See p. 35.5.
X Not to be confounded witli the College of the Propaganda at Rome.
Institution.
Part V.
1841-48.
Chap. 2.5.
Romish
activity in
Protestant
Mission-
fields.
378 Henry Venn — and Survey of Men and Things
(1823) it collected, chiefly from among the shopkeepers and
artizans of Lyons, about £1900. In 1833 its income was £13,000 ;
in 1843, £141,000; in 1852, £200,000. In 1843 it claimed to be
assisting 130 bishops and 4000 priests, belonging to various Eoman
orders and societies. This originally humble voluntary society
was in fact at this time enabling Eome to girdle the globe with
Missions. One of the reports contrasts with much complacency
the economy with which their operations were conducted with
" the extravagant salaries allowed the lordly missionaries of the
Anglican Church in the East and West Indies, the immense sums
swallowed up by the Methodist Proconsuls who rule it over the
Kings of the Southern Ocean, and the innumerable hawkers of
Bibles, whose prudent zeal extends no further than to introduce
along the coasts of China, w4th smuggled opium, the sacred
writings which they profane."
Protestant Missions soon felt the effects of this new energy of
Eoman Catholic France. In 1839 the C.M.S. Eeport noticed the
" direct and undisguised hostility to Protestant Missions which
Eome w^as showing in India, in New Zealand, in the Levant and
Abyssinia, and among the Eed Indians." But it was added, " It
is an axiom established by the history of the Gospel, that wherever
the soil has been best cultivated, and wherever the hopes of a
future harvest are most promising, there the enemy will be the
most busy in sowing tares." Again, in the Eeport of 1847 : —
" Eacli successive year affords fresh proof of the warlike activity in
the Koniish camp, and sees the nmltitudes sent out on Foreign Missions
who have been trained in the College of the Propaganda. In numbers
and activity they far outdo the advocates of the Truth. While we are
meditating'to send a catechist to a distant tribe of North-West American
Indians, 1000 miles from the headquarters of both parties, we hear that
four Komish priests are already among them ! While the Church of
England for a whole year seeks in vain for one missionary to China, the
Romish agent at Hong Kong negotiates for a contract with a Steam
Navigation Company to carry to China 100 priests within the year!
. . . The intrusions into our Missions in Krishnagar and New Zealand
are but faint skirmishes, to be numbered among the many signs which
unequivocally proclaim that the battle between Popery and Protestant-
ism must be fought on the Mission- field no less than at home."
Romish
activity in
England.
" No less than at home." These words contain an allusion to
the growing activity of Eome in England at the time, encouraged
by the Tractarian secessions. In 1845, Peel had carried his bill
giving further grants to Maynooth College,"-'' despite an out-
burst of Protestant feeling. Then came the great Irish famine
which led to the Eepeal of the Corn Laws. This gave Christian
people in England an opportunity to fight Eomanism in Ireland
with spiritual w^eapons. The charity of England, which saved
* On account of which Mr. Gladstone left the Ministry. Ciu-iously enough
it was Mr. Gladstone's Irish Church Disestablishment Bill of 1869 that
abolished the Maynooth subsidy.
Henry Venn — and Survey of Men and Things 379
thousands of lives of Irish Eomanists, predisposed them— just as Part V.
similar charity dispensed by missionaries among famine-stricken qj^^^~^^-'
people in India predisposes them — to listen to the message of ^^'^' '^'
free salvation from their benefactors. Hence the Irish Church Irish
Missions, into the cause of which Edward Bickersteth flung him- M^issfons.
self at this time with characteristic ardour.- " While Enghshmen
in general," writes his biographer, Professor Birks, "felt the
plain duty of relieving temporal distress, there were a smaller
number of earnest Christians who saw in this visitation of God
a still louder call to care for perishing souls, and to raise them
from the darkness of sin and superstition into the glorious liberty
of the Gospel of Christ." " The false benevolence which pre-
tended to heal the miseries of Ireland by an ampler supply of
Popery at the expense of the State [alluding to Maynooth] called
for vigorous efforts of real Christian love in a more earnest
diffusion of the Gospel, the only true remedy for Ireland's distress
and moral degradation." \ To this work the leaders of the
Church Missionary Society, never too much absorbed with their
own organization to care for other Christian enterprises, gave their
warm co-operation ; and the Missionarij Ecgister regularly reported
its progress.
Concerning another movement of the day — also arising in part
out of the Maynooth controversy — they were not unanimous.
This was the Evangelical Alliance. For some years, Mr. Ig'^f^^''^"'
Haldane Stewart had sought to heal the divisions wdthin the Alliance.
Evangelical ranks, to which reference was made in a previous
chapter,]: by issuing annually an Invitation to United Prayer, for
the Church and for the World ; but in 1845, at the instance of
certain Scotch ministers, a conference was held at Liverpool
which issued, in the following year, in the formation of an
organized body, uniting Churchmen and Dissenters, called the
Evangelical Alliance. Of this body Edward Bickersteth w^as one
of the chief founders and leaders. At the time, a strong anti-
State-Church movement was spreading among the Dissenters ;
and Bickersteth hoped that the Alliance might at least cause the
views they honestly held to be more gently and charitably pro-
mulgated. But some of his brethren took a different line, and
feared, by joining the new organization, to encourage the Chvu'ch's
opponents. Josiah Pratt was now dead ; but he had not approved
of the preliminary steps taken two or three years earlier. Hugh
McNeile wrote to Bickersteth, " I am convinced that your ardent
and loving spirit will meet with a distressing disappointment in
the issue of the Alliance "; and the Christian Observer decidedly
* The Society for Irish Cliurch Missions was founded by Bickersteth ,
Alexander Dallas, and Captain Trotter of the 2nd Life Guards. The plans
were laid at Captain Trotter's house, Dyrhain Park, Barnet ; and a fund of
£10,000 was mainly raised by his efforts. He was one of the ablest and
most fervent of volunteer lay evangelists.
I Memoir of E. Bickersteth, vol. ii. p. 363-5. J See p. 285.
3''^o Hexrv Venn — aaw Survey of Men and Things
Part V. condemned the scheme. The same diversity of opinion regard-
pf'^^"!^' i'^^g the Alhance has prevailed in Evangehcal circles ever since ;
aap^ o. 1^^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^ doubt the good it has done by its influence upon
Protestant movements on the Continent.
It has been said that the definite move towards forming the
Alliance was made from Scotland. In fact it was, in one aspect,
an attempt to heal the dissensions which had been at first the
Disruption causc, and then still more the consequence, of the Disruption of
i<irk.°^'^ 1843, and the secession of a large part of the Scottish people, and
of several hundred of the best ministers, from the Established
Presbyterian Church. That great event could not be viewed with
indifference in England. The strong affection of the Evangelicals
for the union of Church and State prevented their approving the
formation of the Free Church ; and yet their natural sympathies
went with its leaders, Chalmers, Candlish, and others, who mainly
represented the evangelical side of the Kirk. Pratt regarded the
Secession as " a noble sacrifice to what was conscientiously con-
sidered to be absolute duty " ; but he was " not convinced that the
sacrifice was called for by a right sense of duty." '■■■ Bickersteth
took a more sympathetic view : he regretted the separation, but he
thought the contention of the Establishment party was " a virtual
denial of the visible Church as a distinct ordinance of Christ."
Episcopal Another series of events in Scotland, though less important in
in Scot- itself, touched the Church Missionary Society more closely. The
land. Scottish Episcopal Church had a Communion Service differing
from that of the Church of England, and on this account several
congregations of an Evangelical type had always kept aloof from
it, and were ministered to by clergymen in English orders ; and
these congregations had a certain legal status under an old Act
of Parliament. About this time, however, some modifications in
the terms of subscription of the Scottish Episcopal Church had
opened the door for their adhesion to it ; and several of them took
advantage of this, to gain the benefit of episcopal countenance.
Unfortunately, two of the Scotch Bishops subjected the con-
gregations of this type at Edinburgh and Aberdeen to high-
handed treatment, in the one case forbidding prayer-meetings, and
in the other case excommunicating the minister for using the
English Service. Both congregations at once seceded, and at
Edinburgh a new church was built for the minister, the Rev.
D. T. K. Drummond, an excellent and faithful clergyman ; and
a few other congregations followed suit. Naturally enough, this
brought upon them the fulminations of High Church organs in
England ; while on the other hand, the Record, whose chief pro-
prietor and virtual director, Mr. Alexander Haldane, was a Scotch-
man, threw itself into the conflict with the energy, and, it must
be added, bitterness, that in those days so markedly characterized
it. Now the old English congregations, both those that adhered
* Letter to Bishop of Calcutta ; in Memoir of Pratt, p. 359.
Henry Venn — and Survey of Men and Things 381
to the Scotch Church and those that held aloof, were the Part V.
supporters of the Church Missionary Society in Scotland ; and a l^-il— j-8.
question arose as to what churches and chapels a deputation from ^''^P- ^•^•
the Society might preach in. The Committee of the Edinburgh perplexity
CM. Association were mostly men who clave to Mr. Drummond ; of c.m.s.
and there was no doubt that the best spiritual life of the Church
was then in the separated congregations. On the other hand
their position was regarded by some of the Society's leading
friends in England as irregular, if not, as High Chvu^chmen said,
schismatical ; and after prolonged discussions the Committee in
Salisbury Square, unable to ignore the strong representations
made to them from either side, resolved that the official deputa-
tions should attend meetings only, and not preach at all.
The controversy continued for many years. The Committee,
after two years, allowed the deputations to preach in the English
Episcopal Chapels, as they w^ere called. Indeed most of the
support came from tliem. This, however, did not satisfy the
friends belonging to them. These friends wished the Committee
not only to allow deputations to preach in the English chapels,
but also to forbid their preaching in the Scotch Episcopal Churches.
But the Committee maintained an impartial attitude, refusing to Attitude of
make any restrictions either way; and of course both sides were ^•^•^•
dissatisfied. In later times, the circumstances altered consider-
ably ; but this does not belong to our present subject.
Such were the men, and such the surroundings, of Henry
Venn's first seven years as Secretary. Or rather, some of them.
For other most important features of the environment of the
period have yet to be noticed. We shall see the Society's Laws
modified to open the door for the adhesion of the Heads of the
Church. We shall see the Archbishops and Bishoj^s joining it.
We shall see the extension of the Colonial and Missionary
Episcopate. We shall see the bitter controversies that clustered
round the Tractarian Movement. We shall see the Society in the
most serious financial crisis it has ever known, and see how it
w'as delivered. Then, in the foreign field we shall see the
opening of China, the commencement in East Africa, the extension
of the West Africa Mission to the Yoruba country, the first
attempt to navigate the Niger in the interests of commerce and
Christianity. Thus the seven years from Venn's accession to the
Jubilee, from 1841 to 1848, were a period of important events at
home and abroad ; a period of much testing of faith and of
principle; a period in which, very emphatically, the Society could
say, "The Lord of Hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our
refuge ! "
CHAPTER XXVI.
The Society and the Church.
Improved Condition of the Church— Church Unions— H. Venn's
Defence of C. M.S. — "Sanction of Convocation" — F. Close's Ser-
mon—Bishop Blomfield's Proposals for C.M.S." and S.P.G. —
F. Close and Lord Chichester on the Proposals — Revision of C.M.S.
Laws — Archbishops and Bishops join C.M.S. — Hugh Stowell's
Sermon, and Bishop Blomfield's — Results, Expected and Actual —
S.P.G. and C.M.S.— Samuel Wilberforce, Bishop of Oxford : his
Career and Influence— J. B. Sumner, Archbishop of Canterbury —
Tractarian Controversies and Secessions — Attitude of C.M.S.
" The hand of the Lord tvas with them. . . . Then tidings of these things came
unto the ears of the Church . . . and they sent forth Barnahas. . . . ^uho,
xL'hen he came, and had seen the grace of God, rvas glad." — Acts xi. 21-23.
Tart V. " I^^^^^HE two great Missionary Societies of the Church "
Ls4i-ks. pTj ^^ ig a yeiy common phrase at the present day. The
Clmpj26. M ^ ^^Q ^^,g^ Qf course, S.P.G. and C.M.S. But sixty
l^^mYlU years ago, if the expression had been used, it
would not have meant these two. It would have
meant S.P.G. and S.P.C.K. Not that the S.P.C.K. has lost
ground in the interval. On the contrary, it never did so great and
beneficent a work as at present. But it is not usually thought of
as a missionary society ; and on the other hand, the C.M.S. has
won for itself a recognition which in the first forty years of the
century it did not enjoy.
Increasing But about the time of Qxieen Victoria's Accession, the
thf°church vigour of the Church of England, and its consequent efficiency,
lan^"^" were rapidly increasing, and the clergy generally were becoming
much more alive than before to the need of fostering and support-
ing Church Societies for various objects. It is customary to
attribute this growing energy and efficiency to the influence of the
Oxford Movement. Evidence has been given in a previous
chapter '■' showing the fallacy of this view. No doubt the
Movement had, subsequently, a great effect upon the Church,
transforming the old-fashioned country parson into an ardent and
hard-working parish pi-iest. But the improvement, as we have
seen, was marked and widespread before that, and while the
Movement was still in its infancy. In particular, some of the
new bishops were raising the standard of episcopal work to a very
* See p. 274,
REV. HUGH :M'NE1LE.
REV. Hugh: STOW ELL,-
ARCHBISHOP SUMNER.
dean; close.
BISHOP .S. WIL3ERFORCE.
Hugh M'Ncilo, T).T)., T.iverpool.
Hush Stowell, :N[aiichcstcr.
J. b. Sumner, Archljisho]) of Canterbury.
Francis Clo.so, Dean uT Carlisle.
Samuel Wilbcrforcc, lii.shop of Oxford and of AVinchester.
The Society and the Church 383
different height from what it had formerly been. Conspicuous Part V.
among these were Bishop Eyder at Chester, Bishop Blomfield at I84l-i8.
Chester and London, Bishop Otter at Chichester, and the two ^^^" ^^'
Sumners, at Wincliester and Chester. Samuel Wilberforce's tenure working
of the Diocese of Oxford, which unquestionably raised still higher Bishops,
the standard of a bishop's activities, and did much to form the
modern idea of the bishop as the working captain of both clergy
and laity in his diocese, did not begin till 1845 ; and Wilberforce,
in the earlier years of his episcopate at least, was very far from
being one of the Oxford School.
One result of the growing energy of the Church was the
remarkable progress of the S.P.G., which has been noticed before.
The S.P.C.K., the Clergy Aid Society (now the Additional Curates church
Society), the Church Building Society, and the National Society, Societies,
were also being vigorously worked. At the same time, the old
office of rural dean was revived, and ruri-decanal meetings began
to be held, which Josiah Pratt, old man and conservative as he
now w^as, welcomed as the beginning of more effective Church
organization — while he deprecated the unofficial gatherings of
clerical friends for spiritual exercises being given up in con-
sequence.* One result was a proposal in some quarters to
combine the five Societies just mentioned in a Church Union, for church
the deanery or some larger ecclesiastical area. Then, in places Anions,
where some of the clergy were favourable to the C.M.S., it was
suggested that it also should be included ; and the Jews' Society
and the recently-formed Pastoral Aid Society were sometimes
mentioned too. Samuel Wilberforce, then Archdeacon of Surrey,
proposed to combine seven Societies, viz., the five before mentioned
and the C.M.S. and C.P.A.S.
The C.M.S. Committee saw clearly that this kind of union, why
well-meant as it was, would be more hkely to strangle the obj^cfed
Societies than to give them fresh life; and just about the time *°'^^<=
that Henry Venn became Secretary, a Circular was issued on the
subject, in which it was pointed out that, even takijig the lowest
financial ground, the step was unadvisable. A man who would
subscribe a guinea to the Church Union might probably subscribe
a guinea cacli to the different Societies if approached on their
behalf separately ; or at all events to more than one. Besides
which, the proposal ignored, said the Circular, " a deep-seated
principle of human nature — a legitimate principle as regards
charitable donations — that to him who gives, it belongs to
determine how his gift should be applied ; whereas the
Societies it was proposed to combine all differ from each other,
either as to the operations which they undertake, or as to the
sphere in which they carry on these operations, or as to both
these particulars." In short, the plan was not good for any of the
Societies. The S.P.G., for instance, would get less out of a
* jltinoir, p. 351.
384 The Society aad ihe Church
Part Y. Chiu-cli Union comprising also the S.P.C.K., the A.C.S., and the
1841-48. National Society, than it would if separately worked. How could
/ 1 1 Oft . . . t
P' "• a preacher or speaker interest his auditory in all four at once ?
And obviously the difficulty would be far greater in the case of-
Societies avowing distinctive principles, whether Evangelical or
any other.
c.M.Asso- The Church Missionary Society's Associations throughout the
i^ntact?^ country were therefore directed to maintain themselves intact ;
and it was from the discussion of this subject that the practice arose
of not sending deputations to joint meetings. The Circular of
1841 fully recognized the right of a parish clergyman to divide his
collections in any way he thought best, and to combine any
numl)er of Societies, C.M.S. included, in any kind of Union, if ho
pleased. It only observed that the Society's official deputations
could not be " expected " to be at the service of such parishes.
This regulation no doubt works hardly here and there ; but the
principle involved in it is one which, upon the whole, has been
for the advantage of all the Societies.
It will be readily understood, however, that the refusal to be
included officially in the Church Unions gave a handle to the
many Churchmen who disliked the Society, and were not sorry to
have fresh ground for denouncing it as " not a Church society."
In fact, the very criticisms that have still to be met in some
quarters had then to be met much more frequently. They came
Pusey and most persistently from the rising Tractarian School. Dr. Pusey
Sumner, himself, preaching for the S.P.G. at Weymouth, made a vehement
attack on the Church Missionary Society. Moreover, the cry
began to be raised that Missions should be worked by " the
Church in her corporate capacity," and that all societies were, to
say the least, an anachronism. This view was dealt with, and
opposed, in admirable fashion by Bishop J. B. Sumner of Chester
(afterwards Archbishop of Canterbury), in a speech at the C.M.S.
Anniversary of 1840.
The Church Missionary Society, in fact, was now too large
and important to be ignored. But it could still be assailed.
And it was assailed — as it sometimes is still — with a singular
ignorance of its actual history and work, or of the actual history
and work of the varied organizations which, on different sides,
were invidiously compared with it.
H. Venn's This secms the right place to notice the famous document drawn
^^j^"g^^°^ up by Henry Venn (before he was Secretary), known as the
Appendix to the Thirty-Ninth Keport. There has been a sort of
tradition that its immediate occasion was the settlement of the
controversy about licenses with Bishop Daniel Wilson ; but in
point of fact its date is more than two years after that settlement,
and although it notices the arrangement with Bishop Wilson as
an important illustration of some of its statements, its scope is
actually much wider. It was in reality a public vindication of the
Society from criticisms current among Churchmen at home ; and
The Society and the Church 385
the occasion of its being written was a request from Charles Part Y.
Bridges for an answer to various objections he had met with on pf'^^'^'i,^'
deputation tours/'' Its' title is a comprehensive one — " Bemarks ^^' "
on the Constitution and Practice of the Church Missionary
Society, with Reference to its Ecclesiastical Belations." Such
portions of it as apply to the relations between the mission-
aries and the bishops abroad will be more conveniently noticed in
the next chapter, in which the controversy with Bishop Wilson
will be referred to. At present we have to do with those parts
that are concerned with the general relations between the
Society and the Church at home. The paper begins with an-
nouncing its obiect, viz., " to show that the constitution and Constitu-
o ** . , . . . tion of
practice of the Church Missionary Society are m strict con- c.m.s.
formity with Ecclesiastical principles, as they are recognized in
the constitution and practice of the Church of England"; and
then proceeds to distinguish between the Church's temporal
and spiritual functions, the provinces respectively of Laity and
Clergy : —
" Throughout the system of the Church of England there is a
recognized co-operation of temporal and spiritual functions in matters
Ecclesiastical ; that is, the Laity and Clergy have not only their separate
and distinct provinces, but, in nwiny important respects, they unite
their agency for the accomplishing of Ecclesiastical acts."
Illustrations of this are given, such as Lay-Patrons, Church-
wardens and Sidesmen, the Ecclesiastical Courts, and the
Sovereign as Chief Euler. Then —
" Keeping the foregoing distinction in view, the Church Missionary
Society may be regarded as an Institution for discharging the temporal
and lay offices necessary for the preaching of the Gospel among the
Heathen. It is strictly a Lay Institution : it exercises, as a Society,
no spiritual functions whatsoever."
" Such," the paper goes on to say, " being the constitution of
the Society in theory — are its proceedings conducted in conformity Functions
with this theory, and with the Ecclesiastical principles of the °^^•'^•^•
Church of England ? " These proceedings are then stated to be
the following : —
" I. The collection of the Home Eevenue, and the Disbursement of it
abroad.
"II. The Selecting and Educating Candidates for Missionary Em-
ployment.
" III. The Sending Forth, to particular Stations, the Missionaries
thus ordained, or other Clergymen who have been previously
ordained.
" IV. The Superintendence of Missionaries in their labours among the
Heathen."
Of these, No. 1 is declared to be " altogether within the province
of Laymen." Under No. 2 it is explained that the Society no
* See a biographical sketch of C. Bridges, e\-idently by H. Venn, in the
Christian Ohseri'er of June, 1869.
VOL. I. C C
The Society and the Church
Pakt V.
1841^8.
Chap. 26.
The true
meaning
of " send-
ing forth.'
Pending
revival of
Convoca-
tion, all
Societies
alike
voluntary.
more encroaches upon " spiritual functions " than do the Colleges
at the Universities, which are " Lay-Corporations "; also that in
practice, the examination and training of the Society's candidates
are conducted by clergymen. And the Bishop of London's
sanction and approbation of the training at Islington is referred
to. Under No. 3 is noticed an objection, based on the use of the
word " sending forth," which, it was said, was the province of
the Bishops : —
" Now, here an objection against the Society has been founded on the
use of the term ' sending forth ' — it sounds like an exercise of ecclesiastical
power. But, Ecclesiastically speaking, the Bishop of London 'sends forth '
every Missionary ordained by him. The Law of the land has sanctioned
the two Archbishops, and the Bishop of London, in ordaining persons
to officiate abroad. The Secretary of the Church Missionary Society
rec^uests, by Letter, the Bishop of London to ordain, in conformity with
the provisions of the Act of Parliament, such and such persons, whom
the Society is willing to support in some Foreign Station. The Bishop,
by the imposition of hands, gives them authority to preach the Gospel,
with a view to their Foreign location. In the case of persons already in
Holy Orders, who may join the Society, they may be said to go forth
by their own voluntai'y act ; but their Letters of Orders, given by a
Bishop of our Church, are their mission and commission, Ecclesiastically
speaking.
" Hence, to call the acts of the Church Missionary Society — in selecting
the Station, paying the passage-money, and agreeing to provide the
Missionary's salary — to call these acts a sendiyiy forth of Preachers, in
an Ecclesiastical sense, is to confound names with things, and to lose
sight of all true Church principles."
No. 4 takes us into the mission-field, and must therefore be
considered in the next chapter. The remarks upon it occupy the
larger part of the paper.
Three concluding observations are made, — (1) that although
missionary operations are, from the nature of the case, in a sense
anomalous in the system of the Church of England, they are
analogous to voluntary agencies and work at home ; (2) that they
are temporary in character, having in view the building up of the
future Church in Heathen lands ; and that, in such a time of
transition, it is natural that difficulties and perplexities should
arise ; (3) that all must really depend upon a good understanding
and mutual confidence between the Ecclesiastical Authorities and
the conductors of a voluntary society.
On the first of these three points, there is an important reference
to "a duly-assembled Convocation." The Convocations of the
Church of England had been suppressed since the reign of Queen
Anne, and when Henry Venn wrote this document there was no
prospect of their revival. How it came about that they were
revived we shall see hereafter. But it is interesting to see Venn's
opinion that if some day Convocation should take it in hand " to
decree and to regulate missionary operations," they would have
to do it on much the same lines as those already laid down by
the Church Missionary Society. Also it will be observed that
The Society and the Church 387
there is a passing hint correcting the idea that S.P.G., or any Part V.
other society, was more the official representative of the Church lH-ti-4-K.
than C.M.S. :- Chapj>G.
" And here it may be observed that nothing less than the sanction of
a duly-assembled Convocation can more fully identify the acts of any
Missionary Society within the Church of England, with the Church.
(The American Episcopal Church has, in Convention, thus identitied
itself with a Missionary Society.) Without such sanction, all associations
of Churchmen must stand in the same position. Still further, not to
notice the present abeyance of Convocations, it may be asserted, that
even if the Church were to assemble in her Provincial Convocations,
and to decree and to regulate Missionary operations, such proceedings
could not essentially addto, or alter, those important particulars which,
under present circumstances, entitle the operations of the Church
Missionary Society, to be regarded as Missionary operations of the
United Church of England and Ireland."
These " Eemarks " were printed as Appendix II. of the Thirty- Appendix
Ninth Eeport. In the following year a brief extract from it was Thi°ty.
printed as a Note to the 29th Law% which provides for the going ninth
out of candidates, " ordained or unordained, at the discretion of ^''^
the Committee." The Note begins thus : — "The Bishops of the
Church of England, under the authority of the law of the land,
ordain and send forth [ecclesiastically speaking] the Society's
missionaries." The rest of it has to do with licenses, and touches
points belonging to our next chapter. From ISIS, the " Eemarks "
were printed in full in every Annual Eeport until 1877, when they
were withdrawn because they had failed to meet the case of the
Colombo difficulties. But for the most part they must be
acknowledged to be of permanent value. It is interesting to
find in "the St. Bride's Sermon preached by Francis Close of
Cheltenham in 1841 — the very Sermon in which, as mentioned in
a former chapter, '•= the Society was first definitely called an
" Evangelical Institution " — a parallel passage, but fuller, to Francis
Venn's allusions to the suspension of Convocation, and the volun- c!,°nvoc"-
tary character of S.P.G., and a re-affirmation of Venn's statement tion,
as to who "sends forth" the missionaries in an ecclesiastical and ^'°"^'
sense : —
" Let me observe, that this Society does not assume to represent the
Church; nor can any Society assume this, without presumption. We
are, alas ! in such a situation in the Church of England, that we cannt)t
move as a Church — we have no Synod ; we have no Convocation ; we
have no General Assembly. And it was this very destitution that gave
birth to the Venerable Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, and
that for Propagating the Gospel in B^oreign Parts : these are voluntary,
independent Institutions, conducted by members of the Church of
Eno'land — by the Bishops, Priests, Deacons, and Laymen — but only in
their individual capacity. For if every member of the Church of
England, Clerical and Lay, should join these Societies, thej' would still
be but voluntary Charitable Associations, and would fail to represent
* See p. 289.
C.M.S.
C C
o
388 The Society and the Church
Part V. the Church of England : — in fact, a Chnrch Society is a contradiction in
1841-48. terms ; a vohmtary Association of Church members cannot be ' the
Chap. 26. Church.' The utmost, therefore, that we can hope to do, under these
circumstances, is, to be careful that our Voluntary Institutions for any
spiritual object should be conducted by Christian men, members of oiu-
Church, and, as far as possible, in strict accordance with her doctrines
and her discipline. This character we claim for the Church Missionary
Society, in common with the elder existing Institutions. . . .
" How shall I establish this claim ? Brethren, the time would fail me
to adduce the abundant evidence. Whether I look abroad or at home,
I see the marks of Apostolicity in every act of this Institution. . . .
C.M.s. " But it may be replied that all this, and much more of a similar kind,
'^•'s^e1id°'^ may be true, and yet the important link may be wanting to connect
forth mis- your Missionaries with the Apostolic Church. Well aware of this, we
sionaries." scruple not to confess our faith, that the Church alone can send out
Missionaries ; and we repel the accusation, that this Institution sends
them forth ! Our ordained Missionaries are not commissioned by a
Committee, or by Managers, whether Lay or Clerical ; they are sent
forth by the Bishops of the Anglican Church. Our Missionaries are
ordained by the justly-respected Lord Bishop of this Diocese, ixpon a
Missionary Title for Orders ; or they receive Holy Orders at the hands
of Colonial Bishops : and thus the exact position in which we are placed
is fully recognized. The Society is but as the Patron of perpetual
Advowsons in distant lands, nominating the Incumbents ; as the parent
of a j^outh, presenting him to the Bishop ; as the College in which he is
educated, claiming Holy Orders : and while the Society, standing in the
position of the Patron, the Parent, or the University, determines, as
they all do, the special location of the Minister, it is the mission of the
Bishop by which he is sent forth ; and under the license of the Bishop
he is placed, wherever he is found in his work. How idle it is, to tell
us that our Missionaries are not Episcopally sent forth ; or that our
Society is wanting in a true Church character !
" To such captious cavillers we are ready to reply : Are they Episco-
palians P so are we. Are they Apostolicals ? so are we. Are they lovers
of order, and Church Authority 't so are we ; and so ivere we — it may be
added — before ancient novelties were revived ! Whatever they are, as
Churchmen, so are we. Nay, like the Apostle, we may say, We are more.
Who originated Episcopacy in India ? — Buchanan, and others, who were
the Founders of the Church Missionary Society. Who conveyed the
first Bishop to New Zealand ? * — the Church Missionary Society ! And
if, in that interesting colony, there soon be placed a Bishop, it will be
through the request, and at the expense, of the same Institution!"
A few lines further on in the same Sermon we find these
words : — " We have every reason to beheve that, ere long, the
Fathers, the revered Fathers of our Church at home, w^ill take
us to their protection and cherish us with their favour. ... It
is delightful to look forward to this opening prospect." These
Bishop words were an allusion to Bishop Blomfield's public proffer of
^'"roaches ^^^^ right hand of fellowship, made only six days before. To this
cLM.s. we now come.
* This refei'ence is not to Bishop Selwyn, but to Bishop Broughton of
Australia, who visited Australia at the Society's request and expense in 1838.
In the next line the reference is to the proposed Bishop of New Zealand, i.e., in
the issue, to Sehvyn.
The Society and the Church 389
The Society had already been recognized as at least an existing Part V.
fact by both the Primate and the Bishop of London. The former, 1841-48,
Dr. Howley, when himself Bishop of London, had approved the ^^^'
Islington College and ordained the students ; and so had his
successor, Bishop Blomfield. As Primate he had been consulted by
the Society from time to time, particularly on the West Indian
questions. But both felt that something more was now desirable.
The Society's concessions to Bishop Daniel Wilson, as embodied
in the " Eemarks " above noticed, had been much approved ; and
so had the " Remarks " themselves generally. Moreover, in 1840,
Bishop Blomfield put forth the proposals which led in the
following year to the establishment of the Colonial Bislioprics
Fund ; and as the Society's co-operation in the work to be done
by that Fund was desired, it became important to bring it, if
possible, into closer connexion with the heads of the Church.
And it was not the Church Missionary Society only that was
to be approached. The Society for the Propagation of the Gospel, s.p.g.
though commonly regarded as much more ecclesiastically correct, liTo^to^
was essentially also a voluntary Society ; and it had not been, correction
and with the coming increase of the Colonial Episcopate was
not likely to be, without its own difficulties in the perplexing
circumstances of Church work in new countries. Moreover,
notwithstanding Dr. Pusey's advocacy of the S.P.G. , some of the
Oxford Tractarians were attacking both it and the S.P.C.K. One
of their leaders, the Rev. William Palmer, author of Orujines
Litur(jicce, used very strong language at the annual members'
meeting of the S.P.C.K. in 1840. He called it a " congregational
society," a " joint-stock club." The S.P.G., he affirmed, was as
bad, because the Bishops, under its charter (as it then was) were
not ex officio members of the governing body, but had to be elected.
"What," said Mr. Palmer, "would be thought of guinea sub-
scribers in the early Church inviting the Apostles to become mem-
bers of their Committee ? " " The Societies should change their
rules so as only to lay their offerings at the feet of the Apostles, to
collect money for the Bishops." ■■' This reads very curiously now ;
but it enables us to understand why the S.P.G. as well as the C.M.S.
was to be brought into closer connexion with the Episcopate.
Private preliminary negotiations had been going on some time
between Bishop Blomfield on one side and Lord Chichester and
H. Venn on the other. The first public reference to the matter Biomfieid's
was made by Bishop Blomfield at the memorable meeting of colon^a?*
April 27th, 1841, which inaugurated the Colonial Bishoprics Bishoprics
Fund. That meeting and its proper object will come under our ^^ '"^'
notice in the next chapter. But Bishop Blomfield, in the course
of his speech moving the first resolution, said : —
" I have always been of opinion that the great missionary body ouglit
to be the Church herself. It seems to me to follow, as an inevitable
* From a nearly verbatim report of the prolonged discussion, in the Record
of May 11th, 1840.
39° The Society axd the Church
Part V. consequence, from the very definition of the Church, that all operations
1841-48. which are to be performed for the advancement of the Saviour's King-
Chap. 26. dom upon earth should be the Church's operations. At the present
moment, as I have observed, those operations are carried on by two
Societies, both in connexion with the Church ; one which has now for
nearly a century and a half directed its principal attention to the
maintenance of true religion amongst the settlers of Great Britain in
distant parts ; the other, which is of more recent origin, devoting its
energies and applying its resources to preaching the Gospel to the
Heathen ; both most important branches of Christian charity, the
comparative importance of which I will not, on the present occasion,
stay to consider. But there has not been that perfect unity of operation
between them — at least, not that uniformity — which ought to charac-
terize the proceedings of one undivided pure branch of Christ's holy
Catholic Church. Now it does appear to me far from impracticable that a
plan might be devised which should remove the evil and do away with the
seeming anomaly — if it be not a real anomaly — which now I know, from
my own experience, necessarily impedes the progress of both Societies
c M*s ^"'^ "^ *^^^ ^^*^^y work which they have in hand. I think that, under your
come Grace's sanction, means might be devised, and those not of a complicated
under the nature, by which both Societies might be induced to carry on their
Bishops, operations under the same superintendence and control ; I mean the
superintendence and control of the heads of the United Church of this
Kingdom. When I use the word ' control,' I do not mean a control
which shall be exercised in the way of invidious or captious interference
— I do not mean a control which shall limit, except within certain
recognized bounds, the operations of either Society ; but I mean simply
that kind of superintendence and control which, with the willing co-opera-
tion of both Societies, shall secure for both a strict and regular movement
within the limits of the duty which they owe to the Church. I forbear
from specifying particularly the details of the plan to which I allude ;
it may be sufficient to say that, if it were carried into eli'ect, it would
leave both Societies at perfect liberty to prosecute the holy work which
they have in hand unimpeded and uninterrupted ; while at the same
time it would prevent the deviation of either from that straight line of
spiritual policy which seems to be marked out by the very principles of
the Church itself. I think it is impossible not to perceive that the
present time, when we are preparing to extend the full benefits of our
ecclesiastical polity, in all its completeness, to all the dependencies of
the empire, seems to be a peculiarly appropriate moment for taking
this work in hand, and for making provision for the time to come, that
the Church, in her foreign and missionary, as well as in her domestic
operations, shall present an united front to the M'orld, and shall not
leave it in the power of her advei-saries and traducers to say that we
differ amongst ourselves upon the vei-y first principles of our duty."
^he'ste^r^'" The Earl of Chichester, who, as President of the C.M.S., had
responds, been invited to second the resolution, at once responded cordially,
intimating " his great satisfaction with the Bishop's suggestion
as to the necessity of a perfect uniformity of action with regard
to religious Missions."
c.M.s. This was on Tuesday. On the Monday following, Francis
welcomes Close preached the great sermon at St. Bride's already quoted
Biomfieid's fi-Qm. Next day, at the Annual Meeting in Exeter Hall, the
proposa.1, ... ^ , .
Eeport anticipated with gladness the coming concordat, while
The Society and the Church 39 i
taking occasion, in obvious reference to the Tractarian movement, PaktV.
to avow fearlessly the Society's loyalty to the doctrmes of the ^^^^ ^e.
Eeformation : —
" To preach Christ, and Him crucified, has been the great end proposed While
to and by your Missionaries, in accordance with, and submission to tJie holding to
EcclesiasUcal order and polity of the Church This object .md these Gospel ^^^_
principles your Committee trust will be handed down, undehled ami
unimpaired, from year to year. As regards Ecclesiastical questions, the
Committee have always considered that it was no part of their province
to settle them. In all such matters they were desirous to conform to .
the laws of the Church; but as, in applying those laws to Missionary
exertions, new and doubtful questions must arise, the Committee would
hail with satisfaction the adoption of measures by which such (luestions
might be satisfactorily adjusted. And if, in connection with sucli
measures, the fuller sanction of the Heads of the Church to the (.perations
of the Society may be obtained, your Committee would rejoice them-
selves, and would feel that the members of the Society would have fresh
cause for thankfulness. At the same time, the Committee trust that it
will always be maintained by the friends and supportei-s of the Church
Missionary Society, that the Saviour alone is the great Fountain of Life ;
and that Ecclesiastical discipline, however valuable, and however dear to
them, is but the channel through which the waters of life should flow to
the perishing nations of mankind. And they trust that neither faith,
nor watchfulness, nor prayer, will be wanting: that the prmciples of the
Society may never be compromised ; and that it niay contiiuie to be tlie
honoui-ed instrument of sending forth ^he pure Gospel of Christ, as it
was preached by Cranmer, and Latimer, and Ridley, and the Maityis
and Reformers of our Church."
Naturally, several of the speakers referred to the great question
now in the thoughts of all. The President himself enlarged upon ^-d ch-
., commends
It : — it to the
" I would call your attention to the suggestion made by our respected Society.
Diocesan, the Bishop of London, and, as I understand, with the full
sanction of the Archbishop, that if some arrangement c..uld be made by
which the two Societies could agree to refer all matters of an ecclesiastica
nature to one and the same recognized authority, consisting of a Council
of Bishops, that, if this could be d< me, both Societies might expect the
full and public sanction of his L(n-dship and the Arehbishop. I am sure
that I should not be doing justice to my own feelings, if I merely said
that I most tliankfully received this proposition as a member of X.tii
Societies. As a member of the Church Missionary Society, with whose
proceedings and principles I am much more intimately ac.iuainted than
with those of the other, I am not only thankful, but I most cordially
approve of the proposition as in perfect harmony with the spirit ot our
Rules, and with the principles and practice of the Society ever since my
connexion with it. Most earnestly do I pray to the great Head of tlie
Church, whose Name is Counsellor and the Prince of Peace, that His
wisdom, and peace, and truth may direct and accomplish the work thus
happily begun ; that the arrangement i>f the details may be found as
easy ill execution as the abstract proposition is simple, and sound, and
catholic in its character. I rejoice in the prospect of this result, because
I beheve that, anu.ng other benefits, it will place the liishops of our
Church in what I humbly conceive to be their legitimate position m
regard to both Societies. It will enable both the clergy and the laity to
39-
The Society and the Church
Part V. plead the cause of either Society, under the known sanction of their
1841-48. respective Diocesans. It will secure, I trust, the joint and steady-
Chap. 26. progress of both Societies through our land, withcnit rivalry and without
collision. It will enable their Missionaries abroad to pursue with
renewed vigour their present course of Vjrotherly co-operation in the
several departments of Chi-ist's vineyard to which He has called them.
" And, Gentlemen, I rejoice to think that all this may, under God's
blessing, be effected without any change in the principles, or even the
system of our own Society. For although I love to see union and
catholicity in all our religious proceedings — though neither from prin-
ciple nor by disposition am I opposed to useful reforms, nor any stickler
for old forms and practices merely because they are old, — yet do I think
that we should prove ourselves unwise stewards of the trust reposed in
us, ungrateful and forgetful servants of the gracious Master Who for
forty years has so remarkably preserved and blessed and honoured this
Society, if, in the matter of its principles or its constitution, we were
found to be given to change."
Bishop C. Sumner of Winchester, whose identification with the
Society was witnessed by the fact that this was his ninth speech
at an Annual Meeting, warmly endorsed Lord Chichester's words ;
and Bishop Denison of Salisbury, who s]3oke for the first and only
time, regarded the project as equivalent to " the Church becoming
her own Missionary Society," acting by " her own constituted
organs." Edward Bickersteth "cordially concurred" in the
President's view of the matter, and "rejoiced in our more direct
connexion with the Episcopate of our beloved Church." But
the concordat, although projected, was not yet arranged ; and
Baptist Noel, who was the last speaker, called on the Committee
to act with caution, pointing out that the Society was " invited to
enter into certain relations, not with any living individuals, but
with a succession of official persons," and urging that nothing be
done "which might bear the effect of fettering our missionaries
in preaching the Gospel," or impair the security for sending out
" no missionaries but those who believe and love the Truth."
Very soon Bishop Blomfield sent in his definite proposal, which
was a simple but an important one. It was that one new Law be
added to the Society's existing Laws, in these words : —
" That all questions relating to matters of Ecclesiastical Order and
Discipline, respecting which a difference shall arise between any Colonial
Bishop and any Committee of the Society, shall be referred to the
Archbishops and Bishops of the United Church of England and Ireland,
whose decision thereupon shall be final."
The Committee thought this too comprehensive if standing
alone ; and after much consideration, and several interviews
between Archbishop Howley and the Bishop on one side and Lord
Chichester and Venn on the other, it was arranged that another
Law should be added, in order to secure {inter alia) the procedure
already agreed with the Bishop of Calcutta : —
"The object of the preceding Law being only to provide a mode of
settling questions relating to Ecclesiastical Order and Discipline, as to
The
Church's
" own con-
stituted
organs."
B. Noel's
cautions.
Blomfield's
new Law
for C. M.S.
C.M.S.
additions.
The Society and the Church 393
which no provision has yet been made by the Society, it is not to be so Part \.
construed as in any other respect to alter the principles and practices 1841-48.
of the Society as they are contained in its Laws and Regulations, and ChapJJ6.
explained in Appendix II. to the Thirty-Ninth Report.
" The proposed reference shall be made through his Grace the Pnmate,
by the Connuittee, accompanied by such explanations and statements as
the Connuittee may deem advisal)le; and the Connuittee will be bound
so to refer all qucs'^tions falling within the sc<ipe of the Rule so under-
stood as aforesaid, which the Colonial Bishop shall require them to
refer.
" While all decisions of the Bench of Bishops on questions so referred
will be considered l)y the Committee as binding on them an(l their
agents or representatives, the Colonial Bishops or other Ecclesiastical
Authorities, unless concurring in the reference, cannot properly be con-
sidered as so bound." *
The Committee further armnged to alter Law II., ^vhich Alterations
regulates the Patronage of the Society. Hitherto Bishops and age.
Peers had heen Vice-Patrons, and other distinguished persons
Vice-Presidents ; hut it was thought well that a single separate
office should he reserved for the Archbishop of Canterbury. To
this office the title of Vice-Patron was now allotted ; and all others
were to be equally Vice-Presidents. The office of Patron was
still to be reserved for a member of the Eoyal Family.
On July 27th a General Meeting of the Society was held at '^^ ^
Exeter Hall to consider the alterations in the Laws proposed by Ge"epi
the Committee. A great concourse assembled. In opening the ««*'"e.
proceedings Lord Chichester alluded to the fact of the Bishop of
London's proposals applying, not to the C.M.S. only, but to the
S.P.G. also :—
"The object is to bring this and another body of nearly similar
character, the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign
Parts, into direct and immediate connexion with the Established Church
oi Great Britain and Ireland.
" The sole object of his Grace and the Rt. Rev. Prelate is to raise the
importance and extend the usefulness of the two Societies liy ali'ording
to their operations the countenance, sanction, and support of the spiritual
Heads of the Church.
"This cannot fail to prove highly beneficial to this Society. But
it will still more have an important bearing in another respect :— the
junction and avowed connexion of these twt) Societies will tend to
impart general stability to the Church itself."
The Eesolution moving the Laws was entrusted to Lord Ashley ^^^^^^
(afterwards Lord Shaftesbury), who strongly advocated the adop- moves ^
tion of the proposal. Josiah Pratt seconded it, as the oldest and ntwLaws.
most influential of the original members present. He said : —
"If this arrangement were to be purchased by any sacrifice on the ^J^^f^^^^^ j^
part of the Soinety I would certainly demur. I have seriously and ^^'^°"
anxiously considered this question, for it is one that ought to be
* The slight differences in these two Laws as they now stand arise from
alterations made in 1877, with the approval of the ^Urhbishop of Cantorbmy
and tlie Hi.shop of London.
394 The Society and the Church
Part V. thoroughly examined, whether any sacrifice ought to be required of the
1841-48. Society, more especially at this time, when it is clear that the principles
Chap. 26. of this Society, which are those of an Apostolical Church properly
carried out, have been the great cause of its success. If, then, the least
sacrifice of those principles were to be made, to effect this object, I
would protest against it, and rather leave the Society than continue in
it if it were to lose its great characteristic and vital principle of up-
holding the great doctrine of justification by faith in the Lord Jesus
Christ as the ground of a sinner's hope for salvation witli God. But
there is no fear of that. I think that the blessing of God is with the
Society, and that He has led the Archbishop of Canterbury and the
Bishop of London to see that they are called upon by their connexion
with the Church to sanction its operations ; and I hope this course will
not be regarded as any sacrifice, but as a deference paid to the honour
and usefulness of the Church, and to consistency of principle."
He concluded with some remarkable words. "We have no
hope," he said, " of our Church acting as the Church of Scotland
does " (i.e. the Established Presbyterian Church). " That," he
continued, " is the only Chiu'ch establishment which acts as a
Missionary body," referring to the fact that the Scottish Missions
are the official work of the whole Church acting through its
General Assembly. But he went on : — " Since we cannot act as
a missionary body, let us take this course, and at least be ex-
ternally united in the work of Missions. This is the only union
that can be formed at j)resent for that end, and I think it is a
union which, with the blessing of God, will effect that end."
This is only one of many notable signs that meet the reader of
the speeches and papers of that day, that the idea of the Church
as a whole carrying on its own Missions was not an unwelcome
one to the Evangelical leaders, and that they regretted its
impracticability.
An amendment w^as moved by the Vicar of Fairford, Gloucester,
Mr. Eice (afterwards Lord Dynevor), to the effect that the
reference of any dispute should be, not to the whole Episcopate,
but to such Bishops only as were members of the Society. He
expressed great fear lest the adoption of the proposition as it was
should completely hand over the Society to the control of the
Bishops, and he quoted some w^ords spoken to him by Dr. Pusey,
who was, he said, a connexion of his, and whom he " esteemed
very highly as a conscientious person." Dr. Pusey had said that
the Society should collect funds and hand the money to the
Bishops for disposal. Cries of " No," " No," very naturally arose
at this quotation, and Mr. Eice proceeded to say that he feared
that as the Oxford men had failed in their previous attempts to
destroy the Society by saying it was not a Church of England
Society, they were now endeavouring to gain it over to their
own party. He further thought it very unfair that missionaries
should be exactly in the situation of ciu-ates in this country,
whose license might be withdrawn without any reason being
assigned for it.
The Society and the Church 395
The amendment was seconded by the Eev. S. Glynn, "•= but no Part V.
other speaker supported it. Baptist Noel, E. Bickersteth, and ^^J^J^;"^-
J. W. Cunningham spoke warmly in favour of accepting the ''^^'" " '
Bishop of London's proposal, and other clergymen from the Leaders
country followed on the same side. They pointed out that what- ''^P'y-
ever inconvenience might arise from the dependent position of
missionaries in a foreign diocese, neither the resolution nor the
amendment would in any way affect it, and that, in point of fact,
the proposal was for the Society's benefit, in that it provided a
right of appeal against the unlimited powder of Bishops abroad.
All the speakers expressed in strong terms their determination to
stand firm to the Society's principles, and their entire disapproval
of the Tractarian teaching ; but urged that neither one nor the
other was involved in the proposition before the meeting. Mr.
Eice again and again declined to withdraw his amendment,
although generally pressed to do so. But he at last gave way, J^^^^"^
and withdrew it, amid great applause from the meeting, and the ad^ted.
resolution was then put and carried unanimously.
Immediately on the adoption of the Laws by the General
Meeting, Archbishop Howley and Bishop Blomfield joined the
Society ; and x\rchbishop Harcourt, of York, and six other
English Bishops, at once followed their example. It may
be well here to put on record the names of all who had joined
before. They were (not in chronological order), Sumner of
Winchester, Sumner of Chester, Eyder and Butler of Lichfield, ^l^^^^^
Otter and Shuttleworth of Chichester, Burgess and Denison and
of Salisbury, Bathurst and Stanley of Norwich, Ward and j^-n''°''^
Bowstead of Sodor and Man, Pepys of Sodor and Man and c.m.s.
Worcester, Copleston of Llandaff, Longley of Eipon ; also
Archbishop Trench, of Tuam. Those who now joined, besides
the two Archbishops and the Bishop of London, were Law t
of Bath and Wells, Monk of Gloucester, Musgrave of Here-
ford (afterwards of York), Kaye of Lincoln, Davys of Peter-
borough, and Short of Sodor and Man. In the next seven
years these were followed by Gilbert of Chichester, Lonsdale
of Lichfield, Wilberforce of Oxford, Prince Lee of Manchester,
and Eden of Sodor and Man. There were also tw^o Irish
Bishops, Daly of Cashel and O'Brien of Ossory, and several of
the new Colonial Bishops to be mentioned by-and-by. Even
the militant Bishop Philpotts of Exeter became Patron of the
Devon Association, though he did not join the Parent Society. It
may be added that Dr. Hook of Leeds joined at the same time as
the Archbishops, and preached for the Society in his parish church.
* Si\c in the BecorcV>i report of the meeting. But was it not the late Rev.
Carr J. Gljn of Dorset ?
t This was the Bishop Law who, when Bishop of Chester, had been so
hostile to C.M.S. deputations. See p. 134. He was the father of Dean
Henry Law, of Gloucester, a prominent Evangelical in later days.
39^ The Society and the Church
Part V. At the Anniversary of 1842, it was natural that the new
184.1-48. patronage acquired during the year should have a prominent
Chap. 26. place in men's thoughts. The Annual Eeport, indeed, announced
the adhesion of the Prelates in a merely formal paragraph. But
several of the speakers alluded to it with much warmth ; and the
preacher at St. Bride's, who happened to be the most popular
Hugh Protestant orator then living, Hugh Stowell of Manchester, spoke,
Stowell on m.- ? i R . ' r »
the adhe- oi^© i^^f-Y Gvcn Say, exultmgiy of the event : —
Bishops. " A special lustre is reflected on our commemoration this year, because
it is the first since, through the good hand of oiir God upon us, we have
had to thank Him for the accession of both our Archbishops, and of
many other members of the Episcopal Bench, to the Presidency of our
Society. It is an event to make ovir hearts leap for joy — an event, for
which the name of the Lord Jesus is to be devoutly magnified — an event,
which took place at a juncture, and was accomplished in a manner,
which gave to it a peculiar grace. It occurred at a crisis, when many,
from whatever motives, were unwisely and unfairly attempting, by the
formation of unions of certain societies, designated by them exclusively
Church Societies, to brand this Society as unworthy of that designation :
and had our Ecclesiastical Rulers connived at — much more had they
countenanced — such ungenerous proceedings, disastrous must have been
the consequences, not so much to the aspersed Institution, as to our
beloved Church herself. How opportune, and benign, at such a moment,
the accession of the supreme Rulers of our Church to the patronage of
the excommunicated Society ! Nor was the way in which they took the
step less happy than the juncture at which they took it ; for they
required nothing more than a simple ecclesiastical arrangement — an
arrangement not more fitting for them to demand than pleasing to the
Society to make. Not one principle has been abandoned ; not one plan
relinquished ; not one rule rescinded : insomuch, that virtually, if not
actually, our Prelates have endorsed and authenticated the constitution
and character of the Society, even from her birth."
He goes on to enlarge on the advantages of the Church of
England and its "legitimate Ministry"; "Christ having con-
fided to His Church a two-fold treasure — a succession of commis-
sion in the order of her Teachers — a succession of doctrine and
ordinances in their teaching" — concerning which he uses sur-
prising language from the mouth of such a man. But he goes on
afterwards to utter veiy solemn words of warning against " any
attempt, from whatever quarter, or in whatever shape, to corrupt
the Society from the simplicity that is in Christ," and protests
against those whose virtual boast would be, " We determined not
to know anything among you, save the Church Catholic, and her
glorified."
Bishop Two years later, Bishop Blomfield himself preached the Annual
Se?mon at^ Scrmon at St. Bride's.'''' It is a very able and impressive discourse,
St. Bride's.
* Bishop Blomfield to Bishop D. Wilson of Calcutta : — " On Monday I am
to preach the anniversary sermon of the Church Missionary Society. Efforts
have been made to deter me from doing this ; but as I have thought fit to join
the Society, I could not consistently decline the duty. I cannot say that I
am entirely satisfied with its constitution, or with the conduct of its com-
mittees ; nevertheless, I am persuaded that I shall do more good to the
The Society and the Church 397
and is noteworthy for having for its text the verses in Isa. hv. Part V.
which are for ever memorahle as the text of Carey's famous ^,[^"*^~^;
sermon in 1792. It is very faithful in its reference to mediaeval '_^£_ '
darkness, when, after the early energies of the Church in " en-
larging the place of her tent," in "lengthening her cords and
strengthening her stakes," " the scene " (says the Bishop) " was
sadly changed " : —
" The eflbrts of Satan to regain a portion at least of the (loniinidn,
which had been won from him by the noble army of martyrs and con-
fessors, were bnt too successful. Heresy and s(;hism weakened the
stakes of the tabernacle ; superstition removed them, and substituted
for them false and unsubstantial supports ; and then its cords were
slackened, and its curtains were shaken and torn by the blast ; and
many cities were reduced to spiritual desolation ; and the awful warning,
which the Spirit sent to the Churches, began to receive its fullihnents;
and the witnesses were slain ; and the Church herself was driven into
the wilderness ; and it was no longer a (piestion wliether she should
enlarge the place of her habitation, but wliether she should have any
earthly habitation at all, except in name and shadowy form. Then
might she have taken up the complaint of Jeremiah : * My tabernacle is
spoiled, and all my cords are broken : my children are gone forth of me,
and they are not, there is none to stretch forth my tent any more, and
to set up )ny curtains. For the pastors are become brutish, and have
not sought the Lord : therefore shall they not prosper, and all their
flocks shall be scattered.' "
Then, after referring to later efforts in the cause of evangeliza-
tion, and lamenting their inadequacy, he enlarges on the new
schemes for Colonial and Missionai'y Bishoprics (of which our
aext chapter will treat), and gratefully notices the Society's
co-operation in them.
Apparently, a great deal more was expected from the alteration
in the Society's constitution and the adhesion of the Heads of the
CJhurch than has ever been realized. For one thing, it was was
supposed on all hands that the Archbishops and Bishops would ca^ufed
have much more influence in the direction of the Church's by the
Missions than before. Some of the secular papers nuxde merry '^ °^^ '
over the ease with which they had contrived — so it was said — to get
possession of the Church Missionary Society. In point of fact,
the new Laws have never once, in more than half a century, been
acted upon. Not that their value is the less on that account.
Perhaps their very existence has obviated the necessity of appeal-
ing to them.=" For another thing, it was supposed that there
would l)e a lai'ge adhesion of the moderate clergy who had always
put forward the lack of episcopal patronage as their chief ol)jection
Clnircli by assisting it, and by co-operatinp; with it as far as I can, than by
retraciiifz: tlie stops 1 have taken ; nor do I doubt but that its loading: members
are actuated by an honest desire to conduct the Society's operations tipon
soiind Churcli ])rinciples." — Memoir of Jiif:hoiJ BloiiiJicJd, vol. ii. p. 86.
* The instances of reference to certain Prelates, as in the case of the Ceylon
and Palestine controversies, were not formal references under tliese Laws,
though no doubt in conformity with the spirit of them.
^q8
The Society and the Church
Tart V.
1841-48.
Chap. 26.
to the Society. For another thing, it was supposed that the two
Societies, C.M.S. and S.P.G., were now to be in a sense united ;
]iot deprived of their separate and independent positions and
functions, but to be hke two arms directed by one head, the
Episcopate. Josiah Pratt himself so regarded it. In a private
letter he wrote : —
" The union formed with the Propaoation of the Gospel Society is a
union in that which the order and discipline of the Church required in
order to give us the full benefit of her action, so far as she can (without an
act of Convocation) give it to us ; yet leaving us to the full in the inde-
pendent pursuit of our course, as to all those views of Evangelical truth
which first knit us together, and which are the life and soul of our body."
Practically, no such results ensued. First, there was no
" rush " into the Society at all, as some had actually feared,
lest the wrong men should get the upper hand. The clergy who
held aloof from the Society, finding their principal reason for
doing so gone, easily found other reasons as satisfactory to them-
selves. As for the Bishops, they were — as they are still — much
too busy to undertake the detailed administration of complicated
machines like societies having agencies and agents in all parts of
the world; and both S.P.G. and C.M.S. continued to be directed
by their respective Committees, that is to say by clergymen and
laymen having leisure for such work. The two Societies went
their several ways, in friendly occasional communication if the
interests of either, or the common interests of both, required it,
but with little that could be called co-operation, and certainly with
nothing that could be called union ; and with what came to be
almost inevitable rivalry in the country, the friends and supporters
of each being on neither side always generous, or even just,
towards the other side. Probably, bearing in mind what human
nature is, there would have been this kind of rivalry even if there
had been no Tractarian movement ; but that the Tractarian con-
troversy greatly embittered it there can be no question. Not that
the majority of S.P.G. supporters were Tractarians ; very far from
it ; but a young party is always active, and the Tractarians, few as
they were comparatively, were untiring in their efforts to take the
lead where they could.
The S.P.G. at that time was a very close corporation. The
number of subscribing "associate members" was growing
rapidly with the extension of the Society's influence ; but the
number of incorporated members was limited, and the election
was vigilantly guarded; while the " n arrow" " C.M.S. had an
open constitution which admitted every subscribing clergyman
automatically. Leading Evangelical clergymen of many years'
standing as subscribers to S.P.G. could not obtain election into
the body of incorporated members ; but the young Tractarians
contrived to get in, and made themselves conspicuovis in the
Monthly Meeting ; as also in those of the S.P.C.K., as already
mentioned in this chapter. In 1843, Pratt, Bickersteth, and
The SocfETV and the Church 399
others, who were not only suljscribers, but supporters of S.P.G. in Takt V.
their own neighbourhoods, were contemplating withdraw^al, because 1841-48.
the Standing Committee felt unable to give them a pledge that Chap^26.
men of the new School would not be sent out as missionaries, should
To us now it seems surprising that such a pledge should have c.m.s.
been expected. The S.P.G. has always professed to pass no s.p.g.?
judgment, as a society, on a man's theological views. His
ordination by a Bishop is accepted as a sufficient guarantee in
that respect. " None are excluded whom the Church w'ould admit,
and none admitted whom the Church w^ould exclude." '•' That is
a perfectly intelligible and legitimate principle, and well under-
stood. Why then did Pratt and Bickersteth expect such a pledge ?
The answer is that they regarded the Tractarians as outside any
possible area of selection. Tract XC. had been solemnly and
officially condemned at Oxford. Most of the Bishops had
"charged" against the new teachings, which were avowedly in
many respects identical with those of Eome. Both Archbishop
Howley and Bishop Blomfield had written and spoken strongly
against them. How could members of such a party be sent forth
as missionaries by an Anglican \ Church society ? However the
S.P.G. Secretary did give an assurance that the Society would
" adhere to the plain sense of the Articles and Liturgy as their
rule of examination"; and both Pratt and Bickersteth gladly Pratt and
continued members. " It is a serious matter," wrote Bickersteth, fiea'l^Jtcf"^
" to cripple a Society that has done so much for God, and I do not s.p.g.
feel justified in so doing." He preached for S.P.G. from time to
time in various places, both while he was C.M.S. Secretary, and
afterwards.
The question may be asked, What came of Bishop Blomfield's s.p.g.
proposal to bring the S.P.G. also into closer connexion with Bishop^s.
the Episcopate ? The answer is no doubt to be found in the fact
that in 184:6 the Society resolved that in future its Examining
Board should be appointed by the two Archbishops and the Bishop
of London.]:
At this point a gi'eat man may most conveniently be introduced,
whose name has been already once or tw'ice mentioned, and will
frequently appear in sul)sequent pages — Bishop Wilberforce. He f^muei
was not yet a bishop when the Prelates joined the Church Mis- wiiber-
sionary Society but w^as appointed to the see of Oxford in 1845. ^°'^'^^-
The month of November in that year saw two events pregnant
with important issues for the Church of England. On All Saints'
* S.P.G. Digei>f, p. 813. But the Society, proijorly, reserves the rij^ht to
accept, or refuse, or disconnect, a man on other grounds ; and the rules are
very precise. Ibid.
t The use of the woi'd " Anglican " is not so recent as is sometimes supposed.
The Christian Observer of this period constantly uses it. It was in no sense
then opposed to the word " Protestant."
+ S.P.G. Digest, p. 842.
400
The Society and the Church
His love
for C.M.S.
Part V. Day, John Henry Newman was formally received into the Eoman
1841-48. Church by Dr. (afterwards Cardinal) Wiseman.''' On St. Andrew's
^P' ■ Day, Samuel Wilberforce was consecrated Bishop of Oxford. His
parentage, his education, his early friendships, his maiTiage, had
all helped to identify him with the Evangelicals ; though from the
first there w^as combined with his undoubted personal piety a
certain keen sense of the greatness of " the Church " which fore-
shadowed the career of the man who was to become the undisputed
leader of what may be called the Anglican Party in the Church of
England. His eloquence as a preacher and speaker, and his
untiring industry in working to a high ideal of clerical life, were
the admiration of all who knew him ; and the hopes entertained by
the Evangelical leaders that the son of Wilberforce was destined to
exercise commanding influence on their side in the Church are
illustrated by the offer of St. Dunstan's, Fleet Street, pressed upon
him when under thirty years of age by no less a person than
Charles Simeon. Had he accepted it, he would probably have at
once become a power in Salisbury Square. He was already a
fervent advocate of the Church Missionary Society. He had
published a pamphlet in its defence ; he had preached and spoken
for it in many parts of the South of England (he was then Vicar
of Brightstone in the Isle of Wight) ; and in September, 1833, he
wrote : f —
" We have been busy setting up Church Missionary Associations here-
abouts with much prospect of usefulness. It is my favourite society, so
thoroughly Church of England, so eminently active and spiritual, so
important for a maritime nation whose commerce has led her to carry the
Devil's missionaries everywhere."
Like Eeginald Heber,| however, he desired to see the C.M.S.
and S.P.G. united ; not, it is evident, to rob the one of its spiritual
principles or the other of its broad basis and ecclesiastical status,
but so to combine the best qualities of both as to form an instru-
ment for the evangelization of the world worthy of the Church of
England. It was — and such a purpose always is — a noble ideal ;
but the realities of our imperfect state are against it, as has been
shown before in the pages of this History. Samuel Wilberforce,
being personally intimate with good men in both societies, was
trying hard, in 1832-3, to bring them together ; but the attempt, it
is needless to say, failed. " Unhappily failed," writes Wilber-
force's biographer ; § " happily failed," rather, if we consider the
whole circumstances of the Church in the last sixty years.
Both societies have done more good separately than they could
have done united. In 1838, Wilberforce, ever busy and resourceful,
planned a memorial to the Church Missionary Society, to be
His aims
for C.M.S.
* Having been previously, on October 8th, received privately by Father
Dominic.
t L'Je 0^ Bishop Wilberforce, vol. i. p. 68. X See p. 151.
§ Canon Ashwell, author of vol. i. P. 14.
The Society and r/fE CnuRcir 401
largely signed by clergy and laity, calling upon it to " send out I^art V.
The. Church, and not merely instructions about religion." " If," pf'*^~i^"
he writes to a friend,''' " we can get up a strong memorial from lay '"^^^"
and clerical subscribers, we shall force the Society, whose Com-
mittee is very Low Church, to do something." No further
allusion to the proposed memorial occurs in his Biography ; and
no trace of its reception appears in the Society's minute-books ; so
presumably it fell through. Again, in 1843, he wrote to Lord
Chichester on the case of the Society's Associations in Scotland,
arguing against the Committee's neutrality in the controversy f —
that very neutrality which so offended the Becord and a section of
the members from the opposite point of view. As usual, the
Committee were between two fires. But it is noticeable that
Wilberforce in this letter identifies himself with the Society,
speaking of ''our taking a line," " o/^r decision," &c.J He was
then Archdeacon of Surrey ; and it was at this time that he was
planning the Church Union before alluded to, in which the C.M.S.
and the Pastoral Aid Society were to be included. His published
sermons, too, were being highly commended by the Christian
Observer.
It was at this time also that he fell into a mistake very strange His mis-
for so able a man. At an S.P.G. meeting at York, in 1844, he compan-
based his praise of the Society on the fact that it did its work |°" "^
more economically than the C.INLS., for its exj)enditure, he said, c.ivi.s.
was £200 a year per missionary, whereas the C.M.S. spent £1000 a
year per missionary. Which society was really the moi'e economical
at the time is a problem beyond solution, so different was the
work, so different were the methods. The point is that the basis
of Wilberforce's comparison is an absurd one. In fact, the
higher the expenditure per missionary, the larger is the work
done. If in one parish with three clergjnuen £1000 a year is spent
on all church objects, and in another parish with three clergj^men
£5000 a year is spent, that only means that more work is done in
the latter than in the former. There were other errors in Arch-
deacon Wilberforce's argument ; all which were pointed out in
an admirable letter to him from Henry Venn.§ Wilberforce at
once frankly and gracefully acknowledged his mistake and with-
drew his comparison. But if such a man could fall into such a
mistake, how can we wonder at the blunders of inferior men?
In the early days of his episcopate, Bishop Wilberforce was Bishop
severe on the Tractarians. He suspended Dr. Pusey for a time, wiiber-
But though he was always Anglican and anti-Roman, he became church
more and more alienated from the Evangelicals. He continued to p*'"*'^^-
be invited now and then to their platforms, and to speak. He
spoke at the C.M.S. Anniversary in 1846, at those of the Jews'
Society and the Pastoral Aid Society in 1847, and at the C.M.S.
* Life of Bishop WiJherforce, vol. i. p. 129. t See p. 381.
t Life of Bishop Wilberforce, vol. i. p. 294.
§ The coiTL'spomlence is printed iu the Memoir of lUnry Venn, p. 472.
VOL. I. D d
402 The Society and the Church
Part V. Jubilee Meeting in 1848; but in 1852 he wrote, " I had a satis-
1841-48. factory ordination . . . not one Low Churchman in the set." '■'
Cliap. 26. jjg ^g^g nevertheless always sensitive to Evangelical opinion of
him, and often writhed under the BecorcVs lash. It was mercilessly
laid upon him, and sometimes far from fairly. On one occasion
the Bishop wrote privately to the editor to expostulate, but was
told in reply that he was " a Papist in reality," and that " the
salvation of his soul was jeopardized." i On another occasion he
appealed to Bickersteth, and on yet another to Archbishop
Sumner, believing that they could influence the paper. ;[: The idea
that either of them would have been listened to for a moment is
simply comical.
Commence- Here it may conveniently be mentioned that the Guardian was
of "The started on January 1st, 1846, by a small band of able and resolute
Guardian." j^ien of the advanced Anglican school, particularly F. Eogers
(afterwards Lord Blachford), J. B. Mozley, Mountague Bernard,
and E. W. Church (afterwards Dean of St. Paul's). It had a hard
struggle for existence in its early years, but gradually gained
immense influence.
bishop ^^^^ elevation of Bishop John Bird Sumner, of Chester, to the
Sumner, primatial see of Canterbury, in 1848, on the death of Archbishop
Howley, was a cause of great joy and thankfulness to the
Evangelicals. His gentle and concihatory spirit, his faithfulness
to the truth, his sound and quiet Churchmanship, gave great
promise of a successful Primacy. He did not prove a strong
Archbishop ; but it may fairly be questioned whether a masterful
man on either side of Church controversies would have been more
useful. It is interesting to observe that Bishop Wilberforce was
a member of the C.M.S. Deputation that presented the Society's
address to him on his appointment. Under the revised Laws
the Archbishop, being already a Member of the Society, was
Vice-Patron if willing to be so ; § and of course so old and tried
a friend had no hesitation in accepting the office.
The Trac- No oue cau read the contemporary evidence without seeing how
trov^"sies.' g'l'eatly the Oxford Movement fostered division and bitterness on
all sides at this time. This, of course, is not necessarily to its
condemnation. Our Lord Himself, in one sense, " came not to
send peace, but a sword." But the fact is so. The vehemence
of the controversial publications and utterances was of a kind
rarely seen now. On the one side, the Tractarians, many of
whom were brilliant writers, heaped contempt upon the " ignorant
prejudices " of everybody opposed to them, by no means excepting
the Archbishops and Bishops; and, through the younger Mr.
* Life of Bishop Wilberforce, vol. ii. p. 152.
t Ihid.,'voL ii. p. 223. + Ibid., vol. ii. p. 199; vol. i. p. 501.
§ The correspondins: ofRfe of President in the S.P.G. did not fall to him
thus automatically. He had to be elected by the Incorporated Members, and
the election is recorded in the Report of 1848. This has been altered since.
The Primate is now ex officio President of S.P.G.
The Society and the Church 403
John Walter, they enhsted the Times in their favour — the leading Part \^
articles of which had little of the dignity that now characterizes 1841-48.
them. On the other hand, even the decorous Christian Observer, '^P'
though its articles on the Tractarian controversy are very able,
indulged in language which no one would now justify. The new
school were not only called Puseyites, but, after the old Nonjurors
whom they resembled, Sacheverellians and Altitudinarians.
The Evangelicals were of course branded as Puritans — the
infelicity of which name Dr. Overton has shown, as mentioned
before. Some of the new practices most bitterly contested have
long since been generally adopted as real improvements, or are
regarded as indifferent ; for instance, of the former kind, the
weekly offertory, and of the latter kind, the surplice in the
pulpit. But much graver matters than such as these were at
stake, as was shown when we were viewing the first rise of
Tractarianism, and it was only upon these graver matters that
the Church Missionary Society uttered its voice. Indeed the Attitude of
transition from the average pamphlet or magazine article or
newspaper leader of the period to the Church Missionary Eeports
is most startling. Very little is said, it is true. Henry Venn
and his colleagues were " doing a great work," and could not
"comedown" even to solemn and serious controversy. At the
very time that Newman's secession to Eome was shaking the
whole Church, the C.M.S. Eeports took not the slightest notice
of the subject, but dwelt on the calls for men and means from No mere
Africa and India and New Zealand. But when Evangehcal p"'^""'"'
principles are mentioned, there is no mistaking the Committee's
meaning. External things they never refer to. What they stand
by are the fundamentals of the faith.
For example, in connexion with the alarming crisis in the
Society's finances in 1842, the Committee solemnly appealed to
the country to come to the Society's help, on the distinct ground
that they looked for the Divine blessing only upon " the faithful,
plain, and full maintenance of the great principles of ' the truth ' but fidelity
as it ' is in Jesus,' by all the agents and missionaries of the mental
Society, without compromise and without reserve" — on " the *''"*^-
sustentation of a Scriptural, Protestant, and Evangelical tone
throughout all their ministrations " — on " the upholding of the
Bible, and the Bible alone, as the foundation and rule of faith."
So, in 1841, Josiah Pratt wrote to his son in Calcutta (after-
wards Archdeacon Pratt), — " The Church Missionary Society is
becoming more than ever the refuge of Apostolical and Eeformation
Truth ; and by the grace of God it shall so continue." And John
Cunningham, in one of his greatest speeches, at the Annual
Meeting of 1842, exclaimed, " We will preach Christ and Him
crucified — or, we will hold our peace ! "
D d 2
CHAPTEE XXVII.
The Colonial and 3Iissionary Episcopate.
S.P.G. Appeals in Eighteenth Century — First Bishops for America
and Canada — The Colonial Episcopate at Queen Victoria's Acces-
sion—Growth of S.P.G. — The Colonial Church Society — The
Colonial Bishoprics Fund, 1841 — Attitude of C.M.S. — New Zea-
land Bishopric — C.M.S. Relation thereto — Bishop Selwyn — Stowell's
Sermon — Other new Bishoprics — ^Jerusalem Bishopric — Bunsen,
Lord Ashley, Gladstone — The First Bishop consecrated — C.M.S.
Controversy with Bishop Daniel Wilson — The Concordat and
H. Venn — Case of Mr. Humphrey — Bishop D. Wilson's Visit to
England— His C.M.S. Sermon.
" Take heed vnto yourselves, and io all fhe Jlock, in the which the Holy Ghost
hath 7nade you lishnps, to feed the Church of God, ichich He purchased with His
own hlojd."—ActH xx. 28 (R.V.). .
Part V.
1841^8.
Chap. 27.
Colonies,
but no
bishops.
Efforts of
S.P.G.
to obtain
colonial
bishops.
NGLAND had been colonizing for two hundred years
Ijefore the Church of England sent a bishop beyond
the seas. But this was not the fault of the Church ;
certainly not of the English Episcopate. It was
the fault of the State, that is, of the successive
Ministries that raised endless political obstacles. The Church
of England, as an Established Church, is necessarily restricted
in its action by Acts of Parliament, or by the lack of Acts of
Parliament ; and not until that w^onderful year 1786, which
saw the beginning of so many movements that have combined
to produce Modern Missions,-'- did the British Government, at
last, permit the Archbishop of Canterbury to consecrate a
bishop for foreign parts.!
The compiler of the valuable S.P.G. Digest gives a most
curious and interesting account of the efforts made by Chiu'chmien
through no less than one hundred and fifty years to obtain a
bishop or bishops for the Colonies — and made in vain. J Arch-
bishop Laud seems to have been the first to move, in 1634-38.
The Society for the Propagation of the Gospel, to its honour, did
from its very first establishment in 1701 agitate for the removal
of the anomaly of an Episcopal Church being obliged to leave
* See p. 57.
t The cousecration was on February 4th, 1787 ; but the Act enabling it
belongs to 1786.
t See also Bishop S. Wilbci-force's History of the American Church (London,
1846) ; chaps, iv., v.
Tin- Colonial and Mission ary Episcopate 40?
tens of thousands of its members without the advantage of the Part V.
Three Orders of its Ministry. To us it seems an mtolerable .,_
scandal that a man in the American Colonies seekmg ordmation _ _
in the last century should have had to cross the Atlantic to obtain
it-a voyage the perils of which in those days we can now
scarcely realize. At first the S.P.G. only ventured to propose
the appointment of an itinerant Suffragan " to visit the several
Churches ; to ordain some, confirm others, and bless all ; the
very titles being suggested which the now familiar Act ot
Henry VIII. provided for suffragan bishops, and which m our
own day have been adopted at home— Colchester, Dover,
Nottinc^liam, Hull. Negotiations went on for some years;
obstacles were gradually overcome ; and in 1714 success was
almost attained. But the death of Queen Anne put an end
to this as well as to other projects for the greater efliciency
of the Church; and for seventy years nothing was done. Ihe
SPG raised funds ; Archbishops and Bishops, as well as
wealthy laymen, gave large donations ; prelates of high reputQ
like Bishop Butler, Bishop Sherlock, Bishop Lowth, and
Archbishop Seeker, pressed the Georgian Ministries again and
acnxin with plans for sending bishops to America ; but no response
cSuld be obtained, even to so touching an appeal as this from Touching
New Jersey :- %°^^^,^^_
"The Poor Church of God here in ye Wilderness, Tliers none to
Guide her atnons? all ye sons y' slie has broui;ht forth, nor is there
any V takes her by tlie hand of all the Sons y' she has brou.i^ht up.
When ve Aptles lic-ard tliat Samaria had received the \^ ord of God,
inu.Rdratelv thev sent out l> of the cheif. Peter and John to lay their
hands un them,' and pray tluvt they might receive the Holy Ghost;
they did n..t stay for a secular design of salary: and when the Aptles
heard that the Word of God was preached at Antioch, presently they
sent out Paul and Barnabas, that they should go as far as Antu.ch to
conthin the disciples : and so tlie churches were established in the faitJi,
and increased in numV,er daily. . . . Hut we have been here these twenty
years callin-' till our hearts ache, and ye own tis the call and cause ot
God, and yet ye have not heard, or have not answered, and that s all
It was because John Wesley despaired of the Church of Methodilt
EnMand ever sending bishops to America that, immediately after b.shops.
theVar of Independence and the establishment of the American
Republic, he, on September 2nd, 1784, at Bristol, " set apart,
l)v the imposition of hands. Thomas Coke, to be supermten-
dent of the flock of Christ."' This act of Wesley's, done in an
emer^rencv " for the present distress," proved momentous in its
result^s It was the real foundation of the Methodist Episcopal
Church of the United States, perhaps the most vigorous and
influential of all the Christian organizations in America, and now
one of the most extensive and aggressive missionary organizations
in the world.
* S.P.G. Digest, p. 745.
4o6 Th'E Colonial and Missionary Episcopate
Part V. But this great event in the history of Methodism only
1841-48. preceded by a few weeks the gift of the historic Episcopate to
lap^ 7. America. It was the separation of the United States from Great
First Britain that forced the Government to action. " The same stroke
bishopl"for "^^'hich severed thirteen colonies from England set the Church free
the U.S. to obtain for herself bishops of her own." * Samuel Seabury, " a
godly and well-learned man" who had been one of the S.P.G.
clergy in America, being elected by his brethren, came over
to seek consecration. The Government, afraid of offending the
new Eepublic, declined to bring in a bill to enable the Archbishop
of Canterbury to consecrate him ; and he therefore appealed to the
little struggling, but independent. Episcopal Church in Scotland.
On November 14th, 1784, that Church had the honour of providing
the first Bishop of the Anglican Communion in foreign parts.
But the Church of England, though stepping more slowly in the
fetters of her State connexion — not the less galling sometimes
because felt to be of the highest value upon the whole — quickly
followed suit. Largely through the influence of Granville Sharp
— Wilberforce's coadjutor in the Slave Trade campaign — an
Act of Parliament was passed, as already mentioned, in 1786
(26 George III. c. 84), empowering the English Archbishops, with
the assistance of other Bishops, to consecrate persons who are
subjects or citizens of countries outside the British dominions ;
and the American Minister in London heartily concurring, two
clergymen of the American Church, William White and Samuel
Provoost, were consecrated in Lambeth Palace Chapel on February
4th, 1787. One other similar consecration took place in 1790 ; since
which the Church in the United States has gone forward without
English assistance, and its four bishops have become eighty.
The Colonial Episcopate proper began at the same time. On
First August 12th, 1787, Dr. Charles Inglis was consecrated first Bishop
b?sho{fs. of Nova Scotia, his jurisdiction including all the British possessions
in North America ; and in 1793 he was relieved of the overwhelm-
ing charge of Upper and Lower Canada by the establishment of
the See of Quebec, to which Dr. Jacob Mountain was appointed.
So stood the Colonial Episcopate when the Church Missionary
Society was founded, and when the new century opened.
Bishops for The ucxt extension was to India. In obtaining this, a leading
part, as before related, t was taken by the Church Missionary
Society. The S.P.C.K. used its influence to the same end. The
S.P.G. , which then had no interests in Asia, was not concerned in
the project. But it was the influence of the S.P.G., in the main,
that obtained two bishoprics for the West Indies in 1824, Jamaica
and Barbadoes,! and the bishopric of Australia in 1836; while
all three societies combined in the reiterated appeals to Govern-
ment which led to the foundation of the Sees of Madras (1835)
and Bombay (1837).
* H. W. Tucker, The English Church in Other Lands, p. 22.
t See p. 101. + See p. 342.
The Colonial and Missioxakv EriscoPATE 407
Thus, when Queen Victoria ascended the throne, there were Part V.
only seven bishoprics in the British dominions abroad, viz., two p|^;*^~^,*l'
in North America, two in India (Calcutta and Madras), two in the ''^P'"^'
West Indies, and one in Australia ; seven in all. Five months seven
after her accession the first Bishop of Bombay was consecrated, atroad""^^
That made eight. Ac?Sif
In that same year, 1837, the S.P.G. issued an able and com-
prehensive statement on the condition of the Church in the
Colonies, which Josiah Pratt, true to his unvarying policy,
immediately published in the Missionary Eegistcr/^ The S.P.G. ^''^'^]' °^
was now in the full tide of its rapid progress at home and abroad.
Its voluntary contributions, which we have seen were only £1340
in 1820, rose to £11,475 in 1837, to £16,082 in 1838, to £22,821
in 1839, to £38,730 in 1840 ; t cand it was largely extending its
work in Canada, in the West Indies, in India, and in Australia.
In 1837 it had 177 agents abroad, clergymen, schoolmasters, and
catechists ; within seven years the number more than doubled,
being 378 in 1844. A large proportion of these, of course, were
not supported wholly by the Society. Its system has always been,
to a large extent, one of grants-in-aid to local funds or to
supplement Government subsidies ; but the rate of progress is
astonishing.
In 1838 was founded the Colonial Church Society. It had ^^'^^
existed two years before that, as a small organization for supply- Society,
ing Church ordinances to Western Australia ; but at its second
anniversary it extended the sphere of its operations to the Colonies
generally. It undoubtedly owed its origin to the desire of
Evangelical Churchmen, who had httle influence in the counsels
of the S.P.G.,! to stretch out a helping hand to their brethren in
the Colonies; but, like the CM. S., it was intended to be not a
rival of the older society, but a fellow-labourer. One of its leading
promoters wrote : —
" The Church Missionary Society directs its labours to the Heathen,
and has declined applications from the Colonies for ministerial assistance,
leavinf; tliisto the Society for the Propai^ation of the (Jospel. To that
Venerable Society, which it is admitted has not resources equal to its
demands, the one lately established is not a rival : but it is hoped it will
prove, as the spirit in wliich it has originated plainly indicates, a faithful,
disinterested, courteous Auxiliary in the blessed work in which it i.s
engaged, viz., in planting the Church of the Living God in every Coloiiy
of the British Empire."
That the statement w\as true that the S.P.G. had not resources
— rapidly as they were growing — sufficient for the calls upon it is
evident from the fact that at this very time, owing to the with-
drawal of Government aid, it had to close many schools in New-
* M. R., 1837, p. 529.
t The Koyal Letters (.«ce p. 148) were cnntimied, abnnt every three years.
The last was in 18.34, and produced £28,000.
: See p. 398.
4o8 The Colonial and Missionary Jipiscopate
Part V. foundland and discharge the masters and catechists/'' There was
1841-48. then existing a Newfoundland School Society, which had been a
Chap. 27. gpecial child o-f Daniel Wilson's before he went to Calcutta ; and
the Newfoundland clergy (many of them on the S.P.G. roll) applied
to this society for assistance, and it provided teachers at thirty
places which had been sufferers. It was afterwards amalgamated
with the new Colonial Church Society ; which is the reason for
mentioning it here.
We now approach that great date in the history of the Church
Colonial of England,! the year 1841. There were then ten colonial
Fifnd'^i84f l)ishoprics, Toronto and Newfoundland having been added since
' 1837. Bishop Blomfield, in May, 1840, addressed a letter to the
Primate, suggesting the formation of a Fund for endowing Colonial
Bishoprics ; and on April 27th, 1841, was held the great and
memorable meeting at Willis's Rooms, at which the Fund was
formally established, and at which also, as before related,]: Bishop
Blomfield made that public offer to the Church Missionary
Society which resulted in the concordat under which the Primate
and other Bishops joined it. The names of the speakers at this
meeting are worth recording. Archbishop Howley presided ; and
the resolutions were moved and seconded by Bishop Blomfield
and the Earl of Chichester (President of C.M.S.) ; Mr. Justice
Coleridge and Bishop C. Sumner of Winchester; Mr. John
Labouchere, the banker, and Archdeacon Manning (afterwai'ds
Eoman Cardinal) ; Mr. W. E. Gladstone, M.P., and Archdeacon
Robinson of Madras. § Large subscriptions were announced, in-
cluding £10,000 from 'the S.P.C.K., £5000 from the S.P.G., and
£600 a year from the C.M.S. towards the support of one bishopric,
that of New Zealand — of which more presently.
Scheme The four Archbishops of the then United Church of England
Bishops, ii-ud Ireland, and twenty-five Bishops, then issued a manifesto,
embodying the following proposals : — The first bishopric to be
established was New Zealand. The next was to be one for the
British possessions in the Mediterranean Sea, with jurisdiction
over the Anglican congregations in Spain, Italy, kc. This was
intended to be at Malta, where Queen Adelaide, widow of William
IV., was building a church at her own expense ; but in the event
Gibraltar was selected instead as the seat of the bishopric. Then
were to follow New Brunswick, the Cape, Van Diemon's Land
(i.e. Tasmania), and Ceylon. The claims were also mentioned of
Sierra Leone, British (luiana. South Australia, Port Philip (i.e.
* See Misxionarij Rerii<fcr, 1838, p. 229. The fact is not mentioned in tlio
S.P.(t. Digest, or in the S.P.C.K. Uistoni of the Church in Canada.
t See p. .367. ' X See p. 389.
§ In 1891, the Jiibiloo of the Coh)iiial Bishoprics Fund was celebrated by a
meeting at wliicli Mr. Ghidstone again spoke after tlie fifty year.s' interval,
and Sir John Kennaway sj)()ke as representative of the Church Missionary
Society.
The Coi.oxial axd M/ssio.xar) Episcopate 409
Melbourne), Western Australia, Northern India (where a See of Part V.
A^M-a was contemplated), and Smitliern India (for Tinnevelly and ^^^-^:^
Travancore). The bishoprics actually founded l^etween 18-41 and J_
the C.M.S. Jubilee were New Zealand, Tasmania, Antij^ma,
Guiana, Gibraltar, Fredericton (New Brunswick), Colombo, Cape
Town, Newcastle (N.S. Wales), Melbourne, and Adelaide ; also
Jerusalem, under special circumstances to be presently noticed.
What was the relation of the Church Missionary Society to this R«=^^t^°';^°f
extension of the Anglican Episcopate ? the move-
There is a widely-current notion that the Society, though not ment.
openly objecting to bishops as such, would not be sorry to be
without them ; that the Committee and the missionaries alike use
their best endeavours to prevent the establishment of the Episco-
pate in countries in wliich the Society's Missions are carried on ;
and that when it is a/«/7 accompli, tliey sulnnit with a bad grace,
and render the bishops as little deference as they decently can.
Such a notion could hardly prevail so widely as it does if there
were no foundation for it at all. What, then, is the truth of the
matter?
First of all, it cannot be doubted that the absence of the why^
Episcopate for so long a period in so many of the Missions — in supporters
West Africa nearly forty years, in Ceylon thirty years, in New ^P\^i",^*^"-
Zealand and North-West America nearly thirty years— did
accustom the rank and iile of the Society to Missions without
bishops, and therefore that they were slow to see the need of
them, except perhaps occasionally for confirmations and ordina-
tions. Then secondly, when a large extension of tiie Episcopate
was contemplated, they could not but feel that the choice of men
for bishoprics would lie, in the main, with those who had little
sympathy with the Society and its work ; and it is not unnatural
that some nervousness should have been manifested. Thirdly, it
cannot l)e denied that, in the event, such apprehensions did not
prove, in some cases, to i)e unwarranted. Fourthly, such
tremendous claims to unchecked power came to be put forward
on behalf of the Episcopate, particularly by the Tractarians —
though they themselves set a poor example of obedience to
l)ishops, — that a natural reaction took place in the minds of more
moderate Churchmen. When it was laid down in intolerant tones
that a Church Mission could not even be begun without a bishop,
men could not but ask themselves whether the Spirit of God was
absolutely tied even to His own ordinances, and whether the
blessing which had, as a matter of fact, been granted to many
Missions before any bishop appeared did not clearly prove the
contrary. .
To this extent, there ha^ unquestionably been some foundation ,^^»»|?*^^.
for the current belief. But while the Society lias never professed cognized
to attribute to the Episcopate such an exclusive virtue as would lfj^l°l^
render Missions deprived of its advantages useless,— and while
anion" some of its meml)ers there has certainly been a disposition
4IO The Colonial and Mlssionary Episcopate
Part V. to undervalue those advantages themselves, — it is equally true
rf^^~27 ^^"^'^^ ^^® responsible leaders of the Society have never failed to
^^^^' ' recognize the importance of the Church being represented abroad
in its full organization, to value highly the actual benefits of the
Episcopate, and to render due respect and deference to individual
bishops — who have proved, after all, to be but fallible men. The
large share which the Society has taken from the first in promoting
the extension of the Episcopate, again and again finding both men
and means for the purpose, ought to have saved it from the
invidious remarks often made by those who substitute for a real
knowledge of the facts the imaginations of a prejudiced mind.
Let us now look at the Society's official utterances at the epoch
we are reviewing, and to the acts by which the sincerity of those
utterances was proved,
t^o^rked ^^^ active part taken by the Society in the establishment of the
actively to Episcopate in India has been described in a former chapter. =■' In
1836-38, as we shall see presently, the Committee were earnestly
considering how to get the advantages of a bishop's work and
influence in New Zealand. In 1839, a whole year before Bishop
Blomfield's first move for the formation of the Colonial Bishoprics
Fund, the Committee, in concluding their Annual Eeport, men-
tioned as a "ground of congratulation" "the extension of
Episcopal Authority and Influence in those regions wherein the
Missions of the Society are situated." "It is true," they go on,
" that no new Diocese has during the past year been created in
foreign parts, though more than one be called for ; but the benefits
of Episcopal Superintendence have been, during this year,
increasingly felt in various parts where Dioceses, more or less
new, had previously existed." This refers, no doubt, mainly to
the three Indian sees ; possibly also to Jamaica ; certainly also to
the visit of Bishop Broughton of Australia to New Zealand in the
preceding year. Again, in the Eeport of 1840, the Committee,
after expressing "heartfelt joy" at the increased zeal for church
building at home and abroad, and other Christian enterprises,
— say," Nor less do they rejoice in the fact of the extension of
Episcopacy in the Colonial Possessions of Britain. At present
there are nine Colonial Bishoprics ; and there is a strong desire,
as well as a pressing want, for more." In fact, ilic Society's
leading friends had urged this extejision long before the authorities
others of thc Church saw its importance. " We greatly rejoice," wrote
moved. an Evangelical editor at this juncture, " that the highly-important
duty of adding largely to the number of bishoprics in our Colonies,
which we repeatedly urged many years ago, when the proposal was
reprobated as unnecessary and, as ' making bishops too cheap),' and
lowering their secular dignity, has now strongly commended itself
to the rulers and clergy and laity of our Church, so that before
long, we trust, every British Colony will enjoy the benefits of con-
firmation, local ordination, and episcopal jurisdiction." i
* See Chapter IX. f Christian Observer, Hay, 1S41.
The Colo XI a l and Missionary Episcopate 411
So mucli for the Society's general view of the matter. Let us Part Y.
now come to the definite question of a hishopric for New Zeahmd, ,1?"*^"^'
whicli was tlie Society's special interest, and concerning which '"^^' * '
very strange misconceptions have long heen current. The New c.M.s.and
Zealand Mission was undertaken thirty years hefore the Islands ,^^^ ^^^"
were annexed to the British Empire ; and no one in those days bishopric,
dreamed of an English bishop being sent outside the iMnpire.
The Act of George III. above mentioned W'ould not have apphed
to the case. Even Australia, which was British, was included in
the Diocese of Calcutta ! In 1<S24:, it was constituted an Arch-
deaconry, and the Rev. W. Broughton was appointed Archdeacon
by Bishop Heber. Bishop Daniel Wilson used to send him
instructions regularly. In 1836, as before mentioned, the new
Diocese of Australia was formed, and Archdeacon Broughton,
being in England, was consecrated to be the first bishop. New
Zealand was not included in his diocese ; but did the Church
Missionary Society therefore do nothing? Let us see.
In the Life o/BisJiop Selwyn it is stated that the Bishop " made
an offer" to go to New Zealand, but that the C.M.S. Committee Current
" had grave doubts about the legality and validity of episcopal ^'to^**^^
functions exercised ])eyond the limits of the Empire and of the c.iyi.s.
area assigned to the liishop by letters patent"; and that the
Bisliop "represented that while undoubtedly he had no legal
jurisdiction in New Zealand, his spiritual office might be exercised
validly in a coimtry which formed part of no diocese." Now
see what the contemporary documents state. At the first Com-
mittee meeting after Broughton's consecration, it was resolved to c.m.s.
wait upon him and request him to give such episcopal countenance Bishop
and supervision to the Mission as was possible. He had, however, Broughton
to go oft" suddenly, and in fact he actually sailed the day after the New^'zca-
Committee met. Then they conuiiunicated with him through •^"'i-
^Ir. Cowper, the cliaplain at Sydney, who was Secretary to tlie
Corresponding Committee there which Marsden had formed for
the administration of the New^ Zealand Mission. The Bisliop
replied in due course with the "offer" to go himself to New
Zealand. The legal difficulties supposed to be involved were not
new to the Committee. They had before had to face the question The legal
in the case of Travancore, where the Society's missionaries had ^^^^ '°"^'
been unable to obtain the advantage of the Bishop of Calcutta's
license, as his jurisdiction did not extend into tlie native states.
Nevertheless, they needed no reminder from Bishop Broughton
that there are " functions inherent in the Episcopal office, inde-
pendently of the prerogatives attached to it by the law of
England "—which are the very words of their resolution
(December 6th, 1836) :—
" That thougli the Committee are advised in reference to the
Travancore case that a Colonial Bislioji cannot gi-ant Licenses in extra-
diocesan stations, nor execute his c^tttce to the same extent there,
nor witli the same antlmritv and lei^al sanction, as within the
412 The Colo N't at. and Missioxary Episcopate
Part Y. Hmits of liis i^ateiit ; yet that it is iieveitlieless desirable tliat the
1K41-48. Missionaries aiul Native Converts in such stations should, where prac-
Chap. 27. ticable, enjoy the full privileges of a Christian Church, by participating
in the benefits of the exercise of the Episcopal office, so far as circum-
stances may permit ; especially the rite of Confirmation, the conferring
Holy Orders, and the exercise of pastoral encouragement, admonition,
or counsel, these functions heiny inherent in the Episcopal office, indepen-
dcntly of the pr erogatives attached to it by the law of England T
The Committee, therefore, had no "doubts" at all. They
knew perfectly well that the Bishop's legal jurisdiction did not
extend beyond his assigned diocese ; but this did not make them
the less desirous that the missionaries and converts should
" enjoy the full privileges of a Christian Church, by participating
in the benefits of the exercise of the Episcopal office so far as
circumstances might permit." In fact they rejoiced to find a
Colonial Bishop who did not mind doing a spiritual work which
was extra-legal. With strict accuracy, therefore, the Eeport of
1838 said that " the Bishop of Australia has, at the request of the
Parent Committee, undertaken to visit the Mission "; and again,
the Eeport of 1839 (presented before it was known that he had
gone), that the Committee had " opened a conwiunication with the
Bishop of Australia, ivitJi a vieio to acquire for the Mission, through
his instrumentality, such an exercise of the Episcopal functions as
the nature of the case would admit." Indeed, at the very time
that the Bishop was sailing from Sydney (December, 1838), they
had been further considering how to overcome the obstacles to
the possession of episcopal supervision for the Mission. When
they heard of his visit they again (August, 1839) expressed their
" deep sense " of the need of a clergyman in the Island " invested
with ecclesiastical authority," " to regulate the ecclesiastical
proceedings of the Mission in conformity with the discipline of our
Church." If a bishop could not be obtained, perhaps an arch-
deacon or a commissary might be of partial use.
c.M.s. On receiving Bishop Broughton's report of his visit, the
bfsifop°for Committee wrote as follows : —
New Zea-
land. " The Committee most cordially concur in the judgment of his Lord-
ship, 'that the Church (f Enyland requires to be planted in Xeiv Zealand
in the full inteyrity of Iter system.' This consideration induced the
Committee to request the Bishop of Australia to visit the Mission,
anticipating such information and suggestions as would promote that
object. Since the receipt of the Bishop's letter, other steps have been
taken by the Committee directed to the same end. Should it please Divine
Providcnice to favour their views, and to raise up an individual eminently
devoted, and thoroughly right-minded, to exercise his paternal authority
in the midst of this infant Jiock, the blessings to be anticipated to New
Zealand would be truly great." *
What were these "other steps"? The Committee went to
the Bishop of London, to see what chance there was of obtaining
* Misaionarij Register, 1839, p. 552.
Tin: CoLOXfAL axp Missioxarv Episcupate 413
a bishop for New Zealand itself. On December 3rcl 1839 the P^-n- v.
President and some leading members waited on Bishop 131om- ,,
field He encouraged them to approach the Government, while
he himself went to the Archbishop. The very next day LordoM.s^^^
Chichester interviewed Lord John Kussell, who was then Qovem-
Secretary for the Colonies. Lord John said a bishopric was mcnt.
impossible until New Zealand was annexed to the British
dominions. The Archbishop thought a bishopric should be
pushed for, but said a special Act of Parliament would be
necessary Thereupon the Committee asked Lord John Kussell
to gi-ant them another interview ; but he dechned, saying it was
useless. , , , . ^ t
Early in 1840, Bishop Blomfield put forth his proposals for a
Colonial Bishoprics Fund, and the Committee at once promised
" cordial co-operation " "so far as concerned the New Zealand
or any other CT^LS. Mission." - They urged that a bishopric was
also needed for West Africa, and again the Archbishop and Lord c^m.^s^
John Russell were approached on this point. Just then, news again,
arrived in England of the proclamation of tlie Queen's sovereignty
in New Zealand ; and Lord Chichester and Mr. Coates went to
Lord John to press the establishment of both bishoprics. Lord
John asked if the Society would endow them. He was informed
that there was no power to do this, but that the Society woiikl
support the bishops until an endowment could be obtained. The
Sierra Leone Bishopric had to wait for ten years yet; but the
New Zealand one was pushed fonvard, and in the Report of 1841
the Committee said : —
" Of the Sees which it i.s designed to erect, New Zealand comes
amoiK- the foremost. And the Committee, on pnneiple, and from a
deep c.mviction <.f the necessity of the measure for their mi.ssi.manes
in that island, have undertaken to aid lar-ely m providing the endow-
ment from the lands held by the Society in the islaml : and until
those lands can be made available for the purpose, the Committee have C^M^S-
engaged to contribute towar.ls the salary of the liislmp, an amount i^-"^'-"
not exceeding £(300 per annum." year.
The Society's proceedings in this matter have been given in
detail, because the recital proves to absolute demonstration how
utterly groundless are the statements to be found in some
modern books. Thus, in Dean Jacobs's Church History of
New Zealand, it is said that Bishop Broughton, before visiting
the Mission, " obtained the hesitating, not to say hardly-given, More >
consent of the C.M.S." I And the Life of Sclwijn has this ^^^i^-'Xs.
statement:—" The idea of having a resident bishop among them
was distasteful to the majority of the Churcli Missionary clergj',
* To this an allusion (not quite accurate) occurs in Bishop Sauiucl
Wilborforco's iuurnal. March 24th. 1840 :-" The Ch. Miss. Soc. l>ave just
offeri-.l to ou.low a bishopric witli £1000 a year, an<l lan<l liereafter, it Bp. ot
London will consecrate, for New Zealand. This is a great begunung.
I Cohjnial Chunk lli^turies: Ketv Zcahu)l, ]). 70.
414 The Colonial and Missionary Episcopate
Part V. and was loudly condemned by the Secretary at home."" Who
1841-48. could " the Secretary at home " be? Jowett and Vores were just
Chap. 27. leaving ; Venn had not yet come into office. Is Coates referred
to? Eemembering his independent lay view of things, one
might imagine him in some private circle drawing a picture of
a possible High Church bishop set over a long-established
Evangelical Mission, and "loudly condemning" his anticipated
proceedings. But we have seen that Coates went to Lord
J. Eussell to press the establishment of the bishopric ! How-
ever, suppose that some such thing did occur, the ohiter
dictum of an individual is not the official utterance of the Society.
With regard to the other assertion, that " the majority of
the missionary clergy " disliked the idea of a resident bishop, it
is quite a mistake. There were at the time six " missionary
clergy" in New Zealand, viz., Henry Williams (afterwards
Archdeacon), William Williams (afterwards iVrchdeacon, and then
Bishop), A. N. Brown (afterwards Archdeacon), E. Taylor, E.
Maunsell (afterwards Archdeacon), and 0. Hadfield (afterwards
Bishop). Of these, the brothers Williams had both expressed
in the strongest terms their desire for a bishop. So had
Hadfield, who had only lately arrived. Half the number there-
fore are accounted for at once. Whence come " the majority "?
Moreover, no one who knows the history can suppose it likely
that to Maunsell the idea of a resident bishop was distasteful. Of
the views of Brown and Taylor there is no evidence. On the other
hand it is very possible that the remark may be true of some of
the lay catechists and settlers, who were disposed to presume a
little on the position in which the sudden growth of the
Mission and the paucity of clergy had placed them f — though
Bishop Broughton had written very favourably of them on the
whole. But then how could lay catechists and settlers be "the
majority of the missionary clergy " ? In fact, William Williams's
own statement some years after is decisive : " The appointment of
a bishop had long been desired by the members of the Mission.
The Christian Church had grown to an extent which made it
inexpedient that it should be left under the management of local
committees. It needed a presiding authority, to which all could
look with confidence, together with the exercise within it of those
ecclesiastical functions which are essential to its complete
efficiency." I
Howfind a go far we have only considered the bishopric. What of the
bishopric? bisliop ? New Zealand was not then, as now, a delightful and
flourishing colony. There was nothing in a country inhabited by
a people only just emerged from cannibalism to tempt a clergyman
to desire lawn sleeves. The popular ideas of the place may be
* Life of Bishnp Sehinjv, vol. i. chap. 3.
t See a letter in Curteis's Bisliop Selwyn, p. 79.
J Bishop W. Williams, Chriifianity among the New Zealunders, p. 290.
The Coloxjal axd Missjo.xaky Episcopate 415
gathered from Sydney Smith's witticism — "It will make quite a Part V.
revolution in the dinners of New Zealand: tcte d'Eveque will 1H41-4.H.
be the most recherche dish, and your man will add, ' And there is i"!^ '•
cold clerfjyman on the side-table.' " "■' The most natural course in
such circumstances would have been to select for the bishopric
one of the six clergymen already in the colony. They knew the
people, and the language ; four were University men, and a fifth
had been a naval officer, and was a born leader ; so it cannot be
said that there were none fit to choose from. But they had one
fatal disqualification. They belonged to the Church Missionary
Society. And although the heads of the Church had just joined
the Society, and the Society had voted £G00 a year towards the
episcopal stipend, the appointment, nominally that of the Crown,
was virtually in the hands of the new Colonial Bishoprics Fund ;
and although that Fund was doing nothing for the support of
the Bishopric — as the other half of the stipend was to be paid
by Government — its chief promoters were in the van of the
general movement, and had to find bishops for the new sees.
They did not even consult the Church Missionary Society at all.
It is an incongruous spectacle. Yet the providence of God was
not withheld ; and the choice ultimately fell upon a man whose Choice of
name will be honoured for all time as — with all his faults, and he seiwyn.
had faults — one of the greatest bishops in the whole history of
the Church.
George Augustus Seiwyn was a brilliant Etonian and Johnian.
Born in the same year as Mr. Gladstone, he was an intimate friend
of the future Premier at Eton ; and another schoolfellow, E. Harold
Browne (afterwards Bishop successively of Ely and of Winches-
ter), wrote of him, " He was always first in everything ; and no one
ever knew him without admiring and loving him." At Cambridge
he was second classic of his year, and rowed in the 'Varsity Eight
on the first occasion of the Inter-University Boat Race. He was
a strong Churchman ; not stiff" and inelastic like the older High
Church School, and not enamoured of Roman ways like the new
Tractarians ; but one who thoroughly believed in the Church as a
Divine institution, and had lofty ideas of the part she should play
in the world. When an Eton tutor and curate at Windsor, he
formed one of the Church Unions before referred to, I comprising
four societies, viz., S.P.G., S.P.C.K., Church Building Society,
and National Society. As a clergyman he regarded himself as a Seiwyn's
subaltern in the Church's army, iDound to go wherever his com- obedience,
manding officer sent him ; and when he received the offer of the
Bishopric of New Zealand, he wrote to Bishop Blomfield, —
" Whatever part in the work of the ministry the Chui-ch of
England, as represented by her Archbishops and Bishops, may
call upon me to undei'take, I trust I shall be willing to accept
with all obedience and humility. . . . I place myself unreservedly
* Life of Bishop W'ilberforce, vol. i. p. 203. f See p. 383.
41 6 The Colonial and Missw.nary Episcopate
Part V. in the hands of the Episcopal Council, to dispose of my services
^^■*l"f^- as they may think best for the Church."
^'^' ' ' And so it came to pass that Selwyn was consecrated on Sunday,
Seiwyn Octobcr 17th, 1841, at the age of thirty-three. But he did not
fawyerl ^^^® ^^^ V^^^^ taken by the Crown lawyers in the matter. They so
drew the letters patent as to make the Queen " give him power to
ordain." Against this he protested, very naturally. If a bishop
has any inherent authority at all, he certainly has authority to
ordain. His protest, however, was unsuccessful ; but he did
succeed in getting the appointment of archdeacons left to him.
Against one curious blunder he did not protest. By inadvertence
his jurisdiction was made to extend from 50° South, not to 34°
South, as intended, but to 34° North, thus giving him a large
part of the Pacific Ocean ; and this mistake led long afterwards
to his undertaking the Melanesian Mission.
Although the Church Missionary Society had not been con-
sulted in the choice of a man who was to be bishop over its
fndcTivi s ^^^*^io^' friendly relations were at once entered into with him.
' He accepted the Vice-Presidency. He came to Salisbury Square
and had an interview with the Committee which gave them (in
their own words) " lively satisfaction." And he spoke, with
Bishop Blomfield, at a C.M.S. meeting at the Mansion House,
presided over by the Lord Mayor. In the next Annual Eeport
(1842), the Committee said,—
'■' The necessity for Episcopal Superintendence has been long felt both
by the missionaries and the Committee, in the advanced state of the
Mission. The Connnittee can now report that New Zealand has been
erected into an Episcopal See, and that the full benefits of our Eccle-
siastical Constitution have thus been provided for the infant Church in
those Islands. . . ." [After referring to the consecration of Bishop Sehvj'n]
" In several communications with the Committee, his Lordship manifested
a lively interest in the Society, and kindly expressed his readiness to render
the Committee every assistance in his power toward carrying out their
plans with respect to the New Zealand Mission."
And Venn wrote out to the senior missionary about the new
Bishop as follows : —
" I must congratulate you and the rest of our brethren upon the
appointment of a bishop. I regard this event as the consummation of
all our missionary schemes for New Zealand, and as an answer to the
prayers which we have long been offering up that the Lord would foster
and confirm the infant Church. Though the selection of the individual
to fill the office was made independently of the Society, we trust that it
has been guided by a gracioxis Providence for the best interests of the
Church of Christ. I have had several interviews with the Bishop, and
indulge the best hopes from his Christian devotcdness, his zeal, his
talents, and his large experience in the work of education. I trust that
the whole of our missionary brethren will receive him with the confi-
dence becoming the paternal relation in which he now stands toward
them."
In the remarkable Annual Sermon of that year, which has
The Coloxial axd Mi^sioxarv En scop ate 417
already been noticed and quoted froni,^'' Hugh Stowell in eloquent Tart V.
language dilated on the new Colony and Diocese of New lH-il-48.
Zealand : — <^"'"M'- 27.
" The Apostles did not, in the outset, map out the Heatlien World ""^h
into skeleton dioceses, and plant a Bishop at Crete, at Ephesns, at New zia"
Antioch, — no ; but they themselves, lirstof all, ' went everywhere preach- land and
ing the word,' and they sent forth chosen evangelists to proclaim the ^^^■^^ ric
unsearchable riches of Christ : and when the Lord had given testimony '^ "P"^-
luito the word of His grace, when nudtitudes had been gathered from
among the Heathen, when pastors had been set over the infant churches
thus gathered, and when those pastors themselves needed chief shepherds,
then at length, when a fixed Episcopacy was re(|uii-ed, and when the
Apostles, thitherto the itinerating Bishops of the Universal Church, were
about to enter into their rest,' they instituted and added Diocesan
Episcopacy, to consolidate, perpetuate, and govern the Church ; and so
Timothy was appointed to Ephesus, Titus to Crete, and Ignatius to
Antioch.
" Thus has it been in our modern Missionary progress. This Society The mis-
did not tarry— to instance a beautiful existing illustration of our meaning ^"s't^'th
—till haply there might be a Bishop set over the wild Western Isle of biThop ^
New Zealand ; but she at once introduced, amidst the ferocious caiuiibals "^^t.
of that seemingly inaccessible land, the messengers of grace and peace
and love; and they, preaching Christ crucified, were through grace
enabled so to subdue many a savage spirit ancl soften many a stony
heart, that numerous flocks were gathered from among the fell natives ;
pastors were multiplied over those flocks ; the island began to wear
a general aspect of Christianization ; the P'piscopate was now called
for, to give order and perjietuity to the work; and, lo ! as the result
of our labours, a Bishop lias been consecrated to the fair Western
See.
" In this way the Church Missionary Society h:is had the blessed
privilege of w'el coming to a garden, which she had been the honoured
means of winning from the waste, this master luisbandman in the vine-
yard of God : and such is the maturity of the work in the once barbarous
Isle, now lovely in grace as she is beaiiteous in nature, that it only needs
the parocliial system of our Church to be fully introduced, in order that
we may witlulraw our Missionary labours froni her shores, and turn them
to new wilds in the wilderness, where we may hope to add fresh spheres
to our Primitive Episcopate, and fresh trophies to om- Scriptural Church
--but all for the glory of Christ Jesus. Blessed fruit of oiu- weak C.M.S.
endeavours ! expressive proof of our fidelity to our Church ! For can it |^^f ^V"
with fairness be denied, that as this Institution, muler God, has mauily ingfand^"
helped to annex to the Crown of England's Queen the fairest province and to the
in her wide doniinions— the fairest, becau.se unstained bv the blood of Church,
concpicst, and neither wrested by violence nor filched by fraud from the
aboriginal tribes, but vanquished by the Sword of the Spirit, and led
c-aptive by the cords of love, luitil the nation has virtually said to lier
Benefactress, as did the Moabitess to Naomi of old, ' Thy people .shall
be my people and thy God my God '—can it be denied, that as this
Society has thus helped to add ithe fairest province to the Empire of our
Queen, she has also aided largely in adding the fairest Diocese to
the ample fold of om- Church I-'— the faiiest, because the lirighte.st
modern evidence of the ajiostolicity and catholicity of our Church, of
the soundness of her faith, and the energy of her obedience, of the
* Sec p. 396.
VOL. I. E e
41 8 The Colonial and Missionary Episcopate
Part V. power of hei- love, and of the abiding of the Sjiirit of Christ with her
1841-48. Ministers and in her ministrations — a hving Epistle, known and read of
Chap. 27. all men."
Bishop And Bishop Blomfield, in his C.M.S. Sermon in 1844, before
fiy^fhe''* noticed, thus referred to the Society's part in both the evangehza-
same. tion of Ncw Zealand and the establishment of the Bishopric : —
"... That remote Colony of New Zealand, where this Society, having
been the honoured instrument of displaying the light of the Gospel to
those who were in darkness and the shadow of death, has now been mainly
instrumental in placing that light upon the Church's golden candlestick,
in its Apostolical completeness."
But the C.M.S. was not now to be the only Church Society
labouring in New Zealand. To it was still left the Maori work ;
but in view of the rapid colonization of the country, both the
S-P-G. S.P.G. and the S.P.C.K. gave the Bishop large assistance in
now e ps. p^.Q^^.j^ij^^g clergy, churches, and schools for the white settlers ;
and he took out with him, as a beginning, three clergymen and
four students for holy orders, besides two new C.M.S. missionaries,
one from Cambridge (Dudley) and one from Oxford (Eeay).
The announcement in the S.P.G. Eeport contains what seems to
be the first reference to the C.M.S. in an S.P.G. official publica-
tion : —
" The erection of an Episcopal See in New Zealand must be considered
as an era in the history of that interesting island ; and the Society are
prepared to exert themselves to the utmost in order to render every
assistance which may be required of them by the Bishop. At the same
time, they wish carefully to abstain from intruding on the field already
occupied by the missionaries of the Church Missionary Society, and will
take measures for preventing misapprehension on this subject."
We must not now follow Bishop Selwyn to New Zealand. We
shall meet him there by-and-by.
Other new The majority of the other bishoprics founded between 1841 and
bishoprics. -|^g^g were for Colonies in which the Society was not at work.
But it had Missions in the new dioceses of Guiana and Colombo ;
and Bishops Austin and Chapman at once became Vice-Presidents
and expressed cordial feelings towards the Society. Of the latter
the Eeport of 1845 said, — " The Committee anticipate much
benefit to the Mission from his spiritual direction and paternal
superintendence over the Church in this interesting Island"
[Ceylon]. The Society's interest, however, was not limited to its
own spheres of labour. The new Bishop of Barbadoes, Dr. Parry,
was invited to be a Vice-President, and consented. When Bishop
Gray was consecrated to the new diocese of Cape Town in 1847,
he too accepted the same office ; and his appeal for South Africa was
printed in the Missionary Register with a sympathetic commenda-
tion.''' Another bishop, consecrated on the same day, Charles
* M. E., 1847, p. 301.
The Colonial and Missionary Episcopate 419
Perry of Melbourne, the Senior Wrangler of his year, who had Part V.
been an influential EvangeHcal clergyman at Cambridge, was an 1841-48.
ardent friend of the Society, and long afterwards, when he retired ^*'^P- ^'^•
after a nearly thirty years' episcopate, became a leading memlier
of the Committee. In the decade following the C.M.S. Jubilee,
the Society was concerned in the formation of six new bishoprics,
as will appear hereafter.
Another Anglican Bishopric was founded in 1841, at the same Bishopric
time as that of New Zealand, but under very different circum- Jerusalem
stances. This was the Bishopric in Jerusalem.
Eeference has been made in previous chapters to the visits of
Mr. Jowett and Mr. Connor to Palestine in 1816-19. From
time to time, also, American missionaries, Presbyterian and Con-
gi-egationalist, essayed to work among the Oriental Christians,
but did not settle in the country. The London Jews' Society state and
made various attempts, from 1820 onwards, to establish a Jewish ^f "he Ho^i
Mission ; and from 1835 its agents succeeded in making good Land. °^
their footing in Jerusalem. Converts from Judaism were gathered
into the Church, despite bitter persecution ; and the sympathies of
Christians at home were largely di'awn out towards the work.
Plans were formed for building a church on Mount Zion, Anglican
in the first instance, but with a view to its becoming the head-
quarters of an independent Hebrew Christian Church. For the
study of prophecy at this time, to which reference has before been
made,- had led men like Edward Bickersteth, Dr. Marsh, and
Lord Ashley, to expect the early return of the Jews to their own
land. In 1839, all Syria was in confusion, owing to the revolt of
Egypt against Turkey and the victories of Mehemet Ah over the
Ottoman forces. The Powers at last interfered— except France,
which sympathized with Egj^jt— and drove Mehemet Ah out of
Syria by force. This was one of Lord Palmerston's great coui^s
as Foreign Secretary ; and the Life of Lord Shaftesbury shows us
Lord Ashley (as he then was) pushing Palmerston on, hoping
thus to clear the way for the Jews to settle in the Holy Land.f
As soon as peace was made. King Frederick William IV., who King of
had just come to the throne of Prussia, sent Chevalier Bunsen to proposes
England with proposals for securing from Turkey greater freedom bishopric,
for the Christians in Palestine, and, with this purpose in view,
for sending out an Anglican bishop who should act as the head of
the Protestant community and represent it before the Porte.
This fell in with Lord Ashley's Jewish prospects, and he warmly
seconded Bunsen's efforts. Mr. Gladstone and Archdeacon churchmen
Samuel Wilberforce also took an active part in supporting the^°''?"'*
scheme.: The latter (and very likely the former) really beheved ^^^'"^*'
that the alliance of the English Church with the German Lutheran
* See p. 283. f ^'/e 0/ Lord Shafteshnry, vol. i. chaps. 8 and 9.
I In the Life of Cardinal Mann iniT, Mr. Gladstone is represented as havino-
opposed the Bishopric. But Lord Ashley's diary at tlie time is decisive the
otlier way.
E e 2
4-20 The Colonial and Missionary Episcopate
Part V.
1841-48.
Chajj. 27.
Church would pave the way for the latter presently receiving the
historic Episcopate.''' The Tractarians were furious. f Arch-
bishop Howley and Bishop Blomfield, who were sympathetic, were
beset with their protests, Dr. Pusey loudly complaining that
' ' for the first time the Church of England was holding communion
with those outside the Church." But S. Wilberforce wrote, —
' ' I confess 1 feel furious at the craving of men for union with
idolatrous, material, sensual, domineering Eome, and their
squeamish, anathematizing hatred of Protestant Eeformed men." \
But while the King of Prussia w^as thinking of an alliance
between the two Churches, and of a more recognized status for
German Protestants in Palestine, and while High Churchmen
were divided on the ecclesiastical questions involved, the thoughts
of Lord Ashley and the Jews' Society ran chiefly in quite different
channels. To them the Jerusalem Bishopric was the revival,
after long centuries, of the " Diocese of St. James at Jerusalem."
St. James the Just was "par excellence the Apostle of the Circum-
cision, and the ardent imaginations of the friends of Israel looked
now to a Church of the Circumcision, presided over by a Christian
of Jewish race, and to which an Apostle to the Gentiles, such as
(say) the Archbishop of Canterbury, might perhaps one day
indite a new Epistle to the Hebrews. And when Lord Ashley
obtained the appointment for the Eev. Michael Solomon Alexander,
a Jewish convert, § the joy of men like Bickersteth knew no bounds.
An extract from Bunsen's diary will perhaps best illustrate the
general tone of feeling : —
(July 19th, 1841). — "The successor of St. James will embark in
October. He is by race aii Israelite ; born a Prussian in Breslaii ; in
confession belonging to the Church of England ; ripened (by hard work)
in Ireland ; Professor of Hebrew and Arabic in England (in what is now
King's College). So the hef/hmmg is made, please God, for the restoration
of Israel.'' \\
But before the consecration could take place, an Act of Parlia-
ment had to be obtained, the Acts before referred to in this
chapter not covering the case. Chiefly through Lord Ashley's
efforts, a Bill was introduced, " empowering the Archbishops of
Canterbury and York, assisted by other Bishops, to consecrate
* Life of Bishop Wilberforce, vol. i. p. 200. See a curious proof that there
was some ground for this hope, in Chapter XLI. of this History.
f But Manning and Palmer seem to have been favourable. See Life of Lord
Shaftettbury, vol. i. p. 378. Manning's biographer, however, throws doubt on
this.
+ Life of Bishop Wilberforce, vol. i. p. 213.
§ The story of Alexander's conversion is very interesting. As a young Jew,
he was living in Lambeth with a Roman Catholic who was studying for the
priesthood. Two young ladies visiting in the district persuaded tlie Romanist
to accept and read a Bible. It brought both him and the Jew to Christ. One
of those young ladies was Ellen White, afterwards Mrs. Ranyard, founder of
the London Bible-Women's Association; the other was Martha Edwards,
afterwards Mrs. Weitbrecht of Burdwan.
II Life of Lord Shaftesbury, vol. i. p. 371.
77/ A- Coi.oxiAL Axn Missionary Episcopate 421
British subjects, or the subjects or citizens of any foreign kingdom \^ll_^
or state, to be Bishops in any foreign country, and, withm certain ^^ _^^ ^y'.
limits, to exercise spiritual jurisdiction over the ministers of
British congi-egations of the United Church .of England and
Ireland, and over such other Protestant Congi'egations as may be
desirous of placing themselves under the authority of such
Bishops." On September 14th, 1841, Lord Ashley wrote :—
" Tlie Bill fen- creatiufr the Bishopric of Jerusalem passed last night I ]^°j;^gy.g
May the blessiiiij of the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob, the joy.
Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, be with it now and for ever. . . .
Under God's blessing, j-^r* magna f id."
The Act has ever since been commonly known as the Jerusalem
Act ; but there is no mention of Jerusalem in it. It is general in
character ; and under its provisions all Bishops for countries
beyond the British dominions have since been consecrated (if
consecrated in England), the Crown giving its mandate to the
Archbishop, and citing the Act as its authority for doing so.
If the Act had been passed a year or two earUer, the Bishopric of
New Zealand need not have waited for the annexation of the
Islands to the British dominions. It is a curious circumstance
that an Act which has so largely contributed to the extension of
the EngUsh Episcopate should be so entirely anathema to High
Churchmen generally. They never tire of denouncing it ; but
they use it whenever they require it.
The endowment of the new bishopric did not come from the
Colonial Bishoprics Fund. Even the influence of Bishop Blomfield
and Mr. Gladstone would not have procured it in that quarter
without a struggle. The King of Prussia promised £600 a year ;
and a capital sum sufficient to give a like income was raised l^y
subscription, the London Jews' Society giving £3000. The
nomination was to lie with the Crowns of England and Prussia
alternately ; and England had the first turn and appointed Dr.
Alexander. He was consecrated on November 7th, 1841. One ^{^^"P^er
of the prelates who laid hands on him was Bishop Selwyn, whose cons^e^-
own consecration had only taken place three weeks before ; and "^^^ ■
Bickersteth wrote, — " Perhaps a more solemn effect was never
produced than when the Bishop of New Zealand selected
Acts XX., and read the passage, ' And now I go bound in the
spirit unto Jerusalem,' &c. The Bishop of London was in tears." "'=
Selwyn's biographer apologizes for his presence on the occasion,
saying, "The circumstance caused some surprise to his friends,
and the mention of it now may be a matter of regi'et to those
who here learn it for the first time." i In fact, it was one of the
many instances in which Selwyn proved himself superior to the
prejudices of his own party. A curious illustration of similar
breadth of view occurs in Lord Ashley's journal, in the notice of
* Memoir of E. Bickersteth, vol. ii. p. ly2.
t Life of Bishop Selwyn, vol. i. p. 81.
422 The Colonial and Missionary Episcopate
Part V. a dinner at Eichmond shortly before the consecration, at which
1841-48. Bunsen entertained Dr. Alexander and several friends : —
Chap. 27.
^ " Gladstone stripped himself of a part of his Puseyite garments, spoke
dinner" ^ ^^^^ 3. pious luan, rejoiced in the Bishopric of Jerusalem, and proposed
party. the health of Alexander. This is delightful ; for he is a good man, and
a clever man, and an industrious man." *
All readers of J. H. Newman's A2)oIogia will remember that he
mentions the Jerusalem Bishopric as the last straw in the burden
of his dissatisfaction with the Church of England ; although he
did not go over to Eome until four years later. It is a strange
instance of the vicissitudes that Time brings, that in our own
day, while the revival of the bishopric was secured by Evan-
gelical influence in the teeth of the vehement opposition of
Canon Liddon, its very name has since come to be a red rag
to niany conscientious Protestant Churchmen, while it is now
enthusiastically supported by the very party that formerly
detested it.
c.M.s. not Tlie Church Missionary Society had no connexion, as a society,
corfcerned witli the establishment of the Jerusalem Bishopric. It had then
Jerusalem ^^^ worlc in Palestine ; f and although it had previously sought
bishopric ; the revival of the Eastern Churches, this was not the particular
purpose of the bishopric. That purpose, as already indicated,
was the formation of a Jewish Church ; and this lay outside the
range of C.M.S. objects. Still, the promoters of the scheme were
supporters of the Society. Of the five trustees of the fund, four
were Vice-Presidents, viz., Loi'd Ashley, Sir T. Baring, Sir E. H.
Inglis, and Sir G. H. Eose, while the fifth, Mr. John Labouchere,
was one of the Society's bankers. So the Committee, in the
Eeport of 1842, noticed the Jerusalem Bishopric and the proposed
but rejoic- Gil:)raltar Bishopric together, designating them as " events which
'"^ ^ ' ■ would form a glorious epoch in the history of missionary
operations"; and they presented an address to the King of
Prussia on his visit to England at the time, referring to the
Society's past indebtedness to Berlin for missionaries, and to the
" paternal and beneficial influence " which the new bishop might
exercise over the C.M.S. Missions in Egypt and Aljyssinia. In
after years the Society's Palestine Mission brought it into closer
relations with the new see ; and therefore it has seemed desirable
to give this brief account of its establishment.
Relation of Bcfore closiug this chapter, it is necessary to notice the relation
C M S to • ... . .
bishops of the Society and its missionaries to the bishops in dioceses
abroad. abroad. This can best be done by a further reference to the
famous document by Henry Venn which formed the Appendix
to the 39th Eeport. It has already been summarized, and quoted
* Life of Lo7-cl Shajteshury, vol. i. p. 377.
f Mr. Hodfler says it had, but lie is mistaken. {Life of Lord Shaftculury,
vol. i. p. 366.)
The CoLOXiAi. a.vd Missioxarv Episcopate 423
from, in connexion with the general question of the relations J'jf/?'-
between the Society and the Church ; - but of its four divisions, ^|^^ ^j
one remains for notice here. This is " The Supermtendence of
the Missionaries and their Labours among the Heathen."
We have seen that the first Bishop of Calcutta, Middleton,
declined to recognize missionaries by giving them episcopal
licenses like other clerg>'men ; and that his successor, Heber,
on the other hand, did recognize and license them. On this
question of licensing a controversy arose between the Society and an^B^^hop
Bishop Daniel Wilson soon after he reached India. The Bishop d. wiison.
desired not only to give the missionaries licenses, but to give or
withhold them at his pleasure ; while the Committee urged that
this would put them too much in the unrestricted power of
whoever might be bishop for the time being. In short, the Bishop
wished the missionaries to have a status similar to that of curates
in England, while the Society wished them to have a status as
nearly that of incumbents as the very different circumstances of
the Mission-field would permit. The dispute lasted for three
years ; and the Bishop had much correspondence, not only with
the Committee, but with individual members of it. For example,
Fowell Buxton wrote to him, " For God's sake, and for the sake
of the poor heatliens, do not let your love of the Church ol)Struct
the diffusion of Christianity " ; to which Daniel Wilson rejoined,
" For God's sake do not let your dread of the Church obstruct the
diffusion of Christianity." At length the whole matter was
referred to three friends— Dean Pearson of Salisbury, Dr.
Dealtry of Clapham, and J. W. Cunningham of Harrow. Ulti-
mately, at their instance, the Committee gave -way, and conceded
the main point to the Bishop. + The arrangement was embodied
in the four following Rules, drawn up by the Bishop himself :—
1. The Bishop expresses— by cvj-anting or withholding his license, in JJ'^^f^""
which the sphere of the Missionary's labour is mentioned— his
approbation or otherwise of that location.
•2. The Hishop superintends the Missionaries afterward, as the other
Clergy, in tlie discharge of their Ecclesiastical dnties.
3. The lii'shop receives from those— the Committee and Secretary—
who still stand in the relation of Lay-Patrons to the Missionary,
such conununications respecting his Ecclesiastical thities as may
enable the Bishop to discharge that paternal superintendence to
the best advantjige. The Archdeacon of Calcutta or Bombay
acting under the Bishop's immediate direction when he happens
to be absent.
4. If the Bishop or Archdeacon fills, at the request of the Society, the
offices of Patron. President, Vice-President. Treasurer. Secre-
tary, &c.. he receives, further, all such confidential information,
on all topics, as the Bishops officially neither could wish nor
properly ask (to receive).
* Sec p. 385.
t See Life of Bishop D. Wilson, vol. ii. p. 17; also Memoir of Henry \eui),
2nd edition, p. 144, where there is a letter on the subject from Sir Charles
Trevelvan, who liad been a member of the Calcutta Corresponding Committee.
4^4 The Colonial axd MissioyAKv Episcopate
Part Y. These rules form the basis of Venn's statement in the fom-th
r^^^^lv section of his document. He goes on to embody in very plain
'^P' ■ words the Bishop's view of the matter as in the end adopted by
Venn's the Committee. "The Society," he says, "has recognized the
comments, uncontrolled discretion of the Bishop to grant or withhold his
license, and the propriety of specifying in such license a particular
district as the field of labour ; so that a missionary cannot be
removed from one district to another without the sanction of the
Bishop." And again, " The Missionaries, thus licensed, stand
towards the Bishops in the relation rather of Stipendiary Curates
than of Beneficed Clergj'men." These sentences so entirely
concede Bishop Wilson's point, that we can scarcely be surprised
that the Calcutta Committee, consisting of laymen in high
Government office, rebelled, as we have before seen.''= Nevertheless
Venn's paper was regarded for nearly forty years as the charter
of the Society's liberties. But the Ceylon Controversy of 187G
brought up the whole question again. The Society's Law was
then altered, with the approval of the Archbishop of Canterbury
and the Bishop of London; and the famous " H. V." document
was dropped.
The controversy with Bishop Wilson properly l^elongs to an
earlier section of this History. Its settlement was in 1835-6.
But notice of it has been deferred until now, partly because this
yenn's chapter is a suitable place, and partly on account of Venn's share
influence. -^^ ^^^ matter, his great personality having only risen up before us
in the present section. It is very significant that he was not in
attendance at Committee meetings during the greater part of the
three years that the dispute lasted, as he was then at Hull ; that
within a few months of his return to London and to Salisbury
Square the dispute was settled by the Committee giving way ;
and that he, though not then a Secretary, was chosen to embody
the arrangement, and the Society's general ecclesiastical principles,
in an important paper. The inference is obvious regarding his
great influence and the direction it took. Then in 1841 comes
the addition to the Society's Laws which enabled the Heads of
the Church to join it, and the grant to the New Zealand Bishopric ;
and immediately afterwards Venn becomes Hon. Secretary.
Again, the inference is obvious.
But Venn was no servile worshipper of ecclesiastical authority.
It was he who led the Society to decline a place in the Church
Unions before mentioned ; and as regards the power of the
Society over its missionaries, a case arose at the very time he
became Secretary, which caused much anxious discussion, tested
the new concordat with the Archbishops and Bishops, and gave
the Society an opportunity, after having done so much to satisfy
the autliorities of the Church, of asserting its own just rights.
HumphJ^y! "'^ yoi-'^g missionary in the Diocese of Madras, Mr. Humphrey,
* See ]). ;{;50.
The Colo si al axd Missiosary Episcopate 425
drew plans for a new church, and sent to friends in England an Takt V.
appeal for funds to build it. This church was to be so built p,^'~^"
as to he the outward and visible sign of what is known as the '"^' ''
" doctrine of reserve." The choir was to be for " the faithful,"
the transepts for " catechumens " and "penitents" respectively,
and the nave, separated by an organ-screen, for the heathen; and
the teaching was to be graded accordingly, the " mysteries of the
faith" being concealed from the Heathen. In later times these
principles were avowed by some few High Church clergymen in
India, and were strongly opposed in an able pamphlet by Bishop
Caldwell, of the S.P.G.'Tinnevelly Mission. - But in 1841 such
views were quite a novelty ; and the Madras Corresponding
Committee, with their Secretary, the Kev. H. Cotterill (then an
East India cliaplain ; afterwards Bishop of Grahamstown, and then
of Edinburgh), condemned them at once, and attirmed that any
man holding them was disqualified from being a missionary. To
this the Bishop of Madras, Dr. Spencer, objected. He did not
discuss Mr. Humphrey's particular views : he merely challenged
the right of the Society to disconnect a missionary holding his
license. The case was not referred to the English Episcopate
under the new Law XXXII., because the Committee considered
that Law XXXIII. distinctly excepted it ; but they nevertheless
submitted it in a less formal way to the Archbishop of Canterbuiy
and the Bishop of London. They disavowed a part of the
proceedings of the Madras Committee ; but they successfully
maintained the Society's right to close connexion with any
missionary, while disclaiming the right to judge his qualifications
for oilier service in the Church. The dispute did not alienate
Bishop Spencer. He had been a good friend before, and he
continued a good friend afterwards.
This chapter may fitly conclude with one more reference to
Bishop Daniel Wilson. In 1845 he paid his one onlv visit to Bishop d.
T-i 1 1 1 • 1 ■ X r i. ' • i. ' TT Wilson in
England durmg his quarter of a centuiy s episcopate. He was England.
now on the old atl'ectionate terms with the C.M.S. Committee,
and was received by them with all honour. It was while he was
in England that Samuel Wilberforce became Bishop of Oxford ;
and it is interesting to see that when Wilson had his farewell
interview in Salisbury Square before returning to India, it was
Bishop Wilberfoice who, after Venn's official address, delivered
the Committee's Godspeed to the departing veteran, in a speech
" subdued, affectionate, dignified, and full of heart." f But it
is the St. Bride's Sermon of that year, 1846, that is especially "'s great
worthy of notice. The fact has been already mentioned that st. Bride's.
Daniel Wilson's name is the oidy one that occurs twice in the
list of ninety-eiglit preachers. The sermon was a great one. It
occupied an hour and a half in delivery. The text was, "They
• Seo Vol. III., Chapter LXXVI.
t /.«/.' 0/ T\hhoi, D. iri7*v);i, vol. ii. p. 279.
426 The Coloxial and Missionary Episcopate
Part V. overcame him by the blood of the Lamb" (Rev. xii. 11), and the
1841-48. heads were (1) " The Mighty Foe," (2) " The Means of Resisting
Cha]|x27. him," (3) " The Issue of the Conflict." The Bishop gave a solemn
testimony against Romanism and Tractarianism, and made a
most powerful appeal for men to carry to India the pure and
uncorrupted Gospel. His final words were a touching farewell to
a great assembly of friends who would never see him again : —
" Brethren, 1 have done. I commend the sacred cause of Missions,
and especially in India, to your prayers. I am re-embarking, if God
permit, for the scene of my duties, baptized for the dead. Receive, I
pray you, in love, this my last testimony to the blood of the Lamb.
'' I shall see you no more at our Anniversaries. But we shall
be assembled before the judgment-seat of Christ. Let each of us see to
it, that we meet there on safe ground. Satan's widespread empire is
made up of multiplied individuals. Let us take care that Satan is cast
out from the heaven of our hearts ; and that we believe for ourselves,
each of us, in the blood of the Lamb, and bear our testimony to it, each
in our sphere, even unto ilie death.
" Then may we luuubly hope that, being washed, covered, plunged,
hidden in the blood of the Lamb, we shall pass, as one of our Com-
mentators [Dr. Gill] sublimely speaks, ' under that purple covering
triumphantly to glory ' !
' Deo soli per Christi
Sanguinem
Sit gloria in sempitenum].' "
God grant that the doctrine, the principles, the spirit of this
great sermon may more and more be the doctrine, the principles,
the spirit, of our Colonial and Missionary Episcopate !
5k.
ARCHDN. H. WILLIAMS.
REV. S. MARSDEN.
BISHOP SELWYN.
>
BISHOP W. WILLIAMS.
MRS. W. WILLIAMS.
Henry William.';, Mi.*siciiiary in New Zealand, 1822-1SG7.
Sannicl :\Iars(leii, Cliaplain,' New Smith AVales; Founder of New Zealand Mission.
G. A. Selwyii, fiist r'.i.-^lidp (jf New Zealand.
William Williani.s, Jlissioiiavy in New Zealand, 1825-1878; First Bishop of Waiapu,
Mi'S. AV. Williainh^, AVife of ditto (.survived to 180C).
CHAPTER XXVIII.
New Zealand : The Bishop, the Colony, and the
Mission.
Advent of Colonists— Annexation of New Zealand— Arrival of Bishop
Selwyn : his Testimony, Travels, and Trials— His Difficulties
with C. M.S.— His tardy Ordinations— Colonial Encroachment and
Maori Discontent— Governors Fitzroy and Grey— The Missionary
Lands Question— Grey's Secret Despatch Archdeacon H. Wil-
liams disconnected and reinstated-The Maori Bible— Romanist
Mission— Extension and Successes of C.M.S. Mission— Sir G.
Grey's Testimony— The Melanesian Mission.
" Neither as being lords over God's heritage, hut heim ensamples to thejlock."
—1 Pet. V. 3.
"In perils by mine own cotmtrymen." — 2 Cor. xi. 26. „ m-
" Questions and strifes, . . . whereof cometh . . . evil surmisings. —1 Tim. vi. 4.
IF chronological order be observed, the words of the title Part V.
of this chapter must be transposed. They should be ^^^-f^'
" The Mission, the Colony, and the Bishop." The J_ '
Mission, however, has already been introduced, and
its history sketched through "tliirty years ; ■'•= and in
this chapter we have to do principally with its relations to the
Bishop and the Colon v.
Reference has already been made to the troul)le caused l)y "Xl^yn
runaway convicts and other reckless and unprincipled people who New ica-
settled near some of the Mission stations, set up scores of grog- ^" •
shops, and tempted the Native women into sin. The evil grew so
rapidly that in 1833 Government sent out a Resident, Mr. Busby,
to keep order. But the Consul had no force behind him, and his
" moral suasion " was simplv disregarded and laughed at. Then
as news reached England of a l)eautiful country with a healthy
climate being now accessible, and of the once-ferocious Natives
having been tamed by the missionaries, the rush of settlers began.
A New Zealand Association was formed, which sought parliamen-
tary powers for regular colonization. This scheme was opposed l)y c.ivi.^s.^
the Church Missionary Society, Dandeson Coates throwing all his coioniza-
great energy and ability into the struggle. It is easy now to see tion.
that opposition in such a case was hopeless, and therefore in-
expedient ; but the Committee had before them the cases of
aborigines elsewliere, wlio had been liarbarously treated by
colonists, driven from tlieir lands, and mercilessly slaughtered, as
* III Cliiiptor.s XVI. and XXIV.
428
New Zealand:
Part V.
1841 -i8.
Chap. 28.
C.M.S.
petition to
Parlia-
ment.
New Zea-
land Land
Company.
New Zea-
land
becomes'a
British
Colony,
through
influence
of mis-
sionaries.
in the old American Colonies, in the West Indies, in South Africa,
and in Australia, and they resolved to tight for those whom they
naturally now regarded as their Maori children. Their petition
to the House of Commons in 1838 gives a striking account of
the external results of the Mission. , It mentions the thirty-two
agents, the 2500 Natives in the congregations, the 1500 in school,
the wide observance of the Lord's Day, the reduction of the
language to writing, the Bible translations, the printing-press, the
farm, the water-mill, the introduction into the island of cattle and
sheep and horses, also of new plants and seeds, the influence of
the Mission in checking war and cannibalism, &c., &c.
The opposition was successful, and the bill was defeated ; but a
new body came into existence, the New Zealand Land Company,
which proceeded, without a charter, to send emigrants out, and
agents to purchase land from the Natives. The people thus sent
out were mostly respectable labourers, and upon the whole this
branch of the colonization was fairly well conducted. The southern
districts of the North Island principally were selected, and the
present capital of New Zealand, Wellington, was founded by
the Company's colonists. The testimony of Colonel Wakefield
— a famous name in New Zealand history, — who was the chief
agent, to the character of the Maoris in those districts, is very
striking : —
" The whole of the Native population of this place profess the Christian
religion, and though there are no missionaries among them, they are
strict in the performance of their religious exercises. As is to be
expected, they are but imperfectly acquainted with the doctrines of
Christianity, and are superstitious in many of their observances. But,
compared with what they must have been before — and this is obviously
the true standard of comparison — the improvement effected by their
conversion to Christianity is most striking." *
The annexation of New Zealand to the British Dominions now
became an absolute necessity if law and order were to prevail ; and
in 1840, Government sent out Captain Hobson, R.N., to negotiate
with the Maori chiefs for the establishment of the Queen's
supremacy over them. They were very reluctant to surrender
any of their rights ; but they trusted the missionaries, and on
Henry Williams assuring them that in no other way could they be
protected from the immigrants, they entered into the negotiation.
The French Eomish priests used all possible influence to get them
to refuse ; but in the end the famous Treaty of Waitangi was
signed, on February 6th, 1840, by forty-six chiefs. More than four
hundred others in all parts of the country afterwards signed, chiefly
through the instrumentality of H. Williams, who travelled for
three months to interview all the tribes. The New Zealand
Company's agents, who were at Wellington, were very angry,
regarding the treaty as impeding their proceedings. It contained
* Quoted in Bishop W. Williams's Christianiti/ among the Nciv Zcalanders,
p. 272.
77/ A- Bishop^ the Coi.oxv^ and r/fE Missiox 429
three ailiclcs, (1) ceding to the Queen full sovereignty over the Part V.
ishinds, (t2) guaranteeing to the various tribes all territorial rights, |!^"*^~1^'
with the right of pre-emption of lands reserved to the Crown; (3) ^^^'
extending to the Natives the rights of British subjects. In an official
letter Captain Hohson warmly acknowledged the " efficient and
valuable support," the " very zealous and effective assistance," of
the missionaries, in bringing the negotiation to a happy conclusion.
The Government then formally proclaimed New Zealand a
British Colony, and nominated Captain Hobson the first Governor ;
and he at once appointed one of the C.M.S. lay agents, Mr. George
Clarke, to the office of Protector of the Aborigines.
The way was now clear, as before explained, for the estaljlish- Bishop
ment of a bishopric ; and in due course arrived the Bishop arrives"
introduced in the preceding chapter. On ]\Iay 30th, 1842, Selwyn
landed at Auckland, the infant capital, and on Sunday, June 5th, he
preached in the court-house, for lack of a church, on the words of
Ps. cxxxix. 9, 10, " If I take the wings of the morning, and dwell in
the uttermost parts of the sea ; even there shall Thy hand lead me."
In the afternoon, to the astonishment of all, he conducted a sen'ice
in the Maori tongue, so quickly had he learned it while on his
voyage out. A few days after, he sailed northwards for the Bay
of Islands, and on the evening of June 20th, after dark, Henry
Williams, while teaching his Bible-class at Paihia, had a card brought
to him bearing these words, " T]\a Bishoj) of New Zealand on
the beach." Hurrying down, Williams found Selwyn and one of
his clergy dragging up a boat, having steered their course to the
shore by a pocket-compass. The Bishop quickly charmed every-
body. " I am quite afraid," wrote Henry Williams, " to say how
delighted I am."
Selwyn himself was not less pleased. " I have imbibed," he Seiwyn
wrote to the Society, " the strongest regard for the Native people, wffh the
and a very high regard and esteem for the members of the Mission Mission
in general." And in a private letter, — " I am much pleased with
the missionary clergymen whom I have seen here. They seem to
be veiy zealous and able ministers, and I think myself happy in
having under me a body in whom I shall see so much to commend
and so little to reprove. The state of the ^Mission is really wonder-
fully good." ■■'• On June 26th, he preached a sermon at Paihia in
which occur his oft-quoted and memorable words : —
" Christ has blessed the work of His ministers in a wonderful manner. His
We see here a whole nation of paijans converted to the faith. God rnemorable
has given a new licart and a new spirit to tlionsand.s after thousands ,,f t^s^"^°"y-
our fellow-creatures in this distant (piarter of tlie earth. A few faithful
iiion. by the ]>ower of tlie Spirit of Ooch liavi' l)een tlie means of adding
another Clnistian people to the family of (>od. . . . Young men and
maidens, old men and children, all with one heart and one voice praising
God; all ottering up daily their morning and evening prayers: all
* Curtcis's Life of Selwyn, p. 53.
43© New Zealand:
Part V. searching the Scriptures, to find the way of eternal life ; all valuing the
1841-48. Word of God above every other gift ; all in a greater or less degree
Chap. 28. bringing forth, and visibly displaying in their outward lives some fruits
of the influences of the Spirit. . . . Where will you find, throughout the
Christian world, more signal manifestations of the presence of the Spirit,
or more living evidences of the Kingdom of Christ 'i " *
Seiwyn at The Bishop took up his residence at Waimate, in the north of
Waimate. ^^^^ Noi'th Island, that his headquarters might be among the
Maoris, rather than at Auckland, which was the seat of Govern-
ment, or at Wellington, which belonged to the Company and
where there was a growing population of settlers. He occupied
one of the Church Missionary Society's houses ; and hard by he
started " St. John's College," for the training of both English and
Maori divinity students. Here, within a few months, died one of
the men who had come from England with him, the Eev. T.
Whytehead, Fellow of St. John's, Cambridge, whom he looked to
being his right hand, and the loss of whom he deeply felt. Here,
on February 23rd, 1843, he held his first confirmation, laying his
hands on 325 Maoris: "and a more orderly and I hope more
impressive service," he wrote, " could not have been conducted in
He ordains any churcli in England." Here, on Trinity Sunday, Eichard
c.M.s. Davis, one of the lay catechists, originally a young farmer in
England, was ordained, after twenty years' faithful and un-
interrupted service ; and on SeiDtember 24th, S. M. Spencer, a
new arrival, originally an American.! In the following year he
ordained five other of the Society's lay agents, J. Hamlin,
T. Chapman, W. Colenso, J. Matthews, and C. P. Davies. He
appointed Alfred N. Brown to be Archdeacon of Tauranga, and
He ap- William Williams to be Archdeacon of Waiapu. Of the latter he
P°l'i'o wrote, in a letter to the S.P.G., " He is a man universally beloved,
men Arch- and ouc wdio, during twenty years of residence in a savage country,
deacons, j^^g j^^g^. nothing of that high tone of feeling which distinguishes
the best class of English clergymen." And, a little later, he
appointed Henry Williams Archdeacon of Waimate. With untir-
ing energy he travelled over the whole country, either on foot, or
coasting in miserable trading schooners. Concerning the latter he
only said that a Government brig w^hich brought a new governor
was " a floating palace " in comparison. " He has laboured hard,"
wrote Henry Williams, " and set us a noble examjDle. He does the
work of the best two missionaries I have ever knowai." His very
His first visitation, in 1842-3, lasted six months, in wdiich he travelled
journeys. 752 milcs ou foot, 86 on horscback, 249 in canoes or boats, and
1180 in ships ; total 2277 miles.]: " When I form my plan for the
* This is a longer extract than has been published for many years. It
is partly from the C.M.S. Report of 1843, and partly from Carleton's Life
of Henri/ Willi(i)ni<, vol. ii. p. 58. It is entii-ely omitted in both Tuckei-'s and
Curteis's Lives of Selwyii ; but part of it appears in Dean Jacobs's Church
History of Neiu Zealand, and one sentence of it in Tucker's Emjlisli Church
in 01 her Lands.
t Who died April 30th, 1898. t Life of Bishop) Selmjn, vol. i. chap. 5.
The Bishop, the Colony, and the Mission 431
summer," wrote the Bishop himself, " T write down all the days \^l^
in mv journal, with ' D.v.' against the name of the place which I ^^^^^ ^g.
hope to reach on that day. If I succeed, I add a ' d.g.,' to the
name. Almost all my marks of 'd.v.' have this year been
changed into ' D.G.'" Tvr- •
Everywhere the Bishop found the happy results of the Mission.
Of one Sunday on his tour he wrote, —
"We enjoyed another peaceful Sunday. The morning opened as Among
usual with the morning hymn of the birds, which Captain Cook com- ^^y^^ris^"
pares to a concert of silver bells, beginning an hour before the sun rises,
and ceasing as soon as it appears above the horizon. When the song of
the birds ended, the sound of native voices round our tents earned
on the same tribute of praise and thanksgiving ; while audible murmurs
on every side brought to our ears the passages of the liible which others
were reading to themselves. I have never felt the full blessing of the
Lord's Day. as a day of rest, more than in New Zealand, when, after
uncampiiif;" late on Saturday night with a weary party, you will find
them, early on the Sunday mornin<(, sitting (luietly round their fires,
with their New Testaments in their hands." *
Even where old tribal feuds were ranging professedly Cliristian Between
Natives in hostile camps, their religion was not forgotten. For j.°^p|
instance, hearing of a probable war between two tribes, Selwyn
hastened (as Henry Williams had done before f ) to the place,
and, arriving on Saturday, pitched his tent between the two
parties, and prevented the fighting : —
" On the next morning, Sunday, the whole valley was as (juiet as in
the time of perfect peace, the Natives walking about unarmed amongst
the cultivations, it beiiiij perfectly understood that neither party would
fiyht on the Lord's Day. Going early in the morning to one of theyyaAs,
I'^found the chief reading prayers to his people. As he had just come to
the end of the Litany, 1 waited till he had concluded, and then rea<l the
Communion Service, and preached to them on part of the lesson of the
day, 'A new commandment I give unto you that ye love one another.'
I spoke my opinion openly, but without giving any offence; and the
chief, after' the service, received me in the most friendly manner.'
The Mission had been entirely confined to the North Island,
the Maoris being few and scattered in the others ; but when
Selwyn visited tiie coasts of the ^Middle Island, and even the in the
small South Island, he found every little Native settlement pro- ^^^^^l
fessing Christianity. No missionary had gone there ; but two
voung^chiefs from Mr. Hadfield's station at Otaki had travelled
southward a thousand miles in an open boat to carry the Gospel
to them all ; and the Maoris at every settlement attributed their
conversion to these two zealous volunteer evangelists. All this
while, the pages of the CM. Record and the Missionary Rcyister
were filled with the most touching and delightful narratives of
* From Miss Tucker's Southern Cross and Sout/nrn Crown, p. 231. Other
books pive pan of the extract. Lady I^Iartiti says of Wairnate, " It was (rraiul
to hear the people repeat the respouses all to<,'ether in perfect time. It was
like the roar of waves on the beach."— Owr Mcwrif, p. 34.
I See p. 3.36.
432 Ne w Zeala nd :
Part V. conversions, Christian lives, and peaceful deaths. It would be
] 841-48. impossible in this History to give even specimens of them ; " but
^^^' ' ■ no Mission in any part of the world has witnessed more conspicuous
illustrations of the power of Divine grace. One feature of the
work, however, must not be omitted, so strikingly similar is it to
what we have seen in recent years in Uganda. R. Taylor, one of
the ablest of the missionaries, writes as follows in his interesting
book, Fast and Present in Neio Zealand (p. 20) : —
Features of " I was present when the first case of Maori New Testaments sent to
Ch^?s- Tauranga arrived, early in 1839. The whole stock was at once disposed
tianity. of. One man said he had now a telescope on board his ship which would
enable him to see the rocks and shoals afar off. Old men of seventy
leai'ned to read ; whenever they had a spare moment, they might be
seen clustering round some one who was reading."
Then of his own Wanganui district, a few years later : —
" It was wonderful to see how many could read, and write likewise.
Every day generally brought its Maori mail, with letters on all subjects :
one asking for books or medicine ; another from a teacher, giving an
accoinit of his last sermon, and the heads of it, asking if he had treated
the subject properly : some inquiring the meaning of texts, or as to the
right line of conduct inider certain circumstances."
Taylor also mentions that many could read a book upside down,
owing to their habit of sitting in a small circle with a book open
in the middle. This also is like Uganda.
Seiwyn's Thus all began happily for the new Bishop. But difficulties
cutties^' ^°°^^ arose between him and the Society. It does not seem
with necessary to adjudge blame now. It would be easy to make out
■ ■ ■ a case against the missionaries, or against the Committee at home,
or against Selwyn himself. In fact, difficulties were practically
inevitable in the circumstances. They would arise from very
small causes. Little varieties in worship, or even in phraseology,
are always apt to irritate. A good deal is revealed in a casual
sentence in an unpublished letter from a missionary, that the
Natives " did not understand the Bishop's fast-days and saints'
days." The Bishop, in his strict observance of them, was only
following the Church rules he was used to ; while the Maoris, in
the simplicity of a religion whose ecclesiastical correctness had
been confined to Sunday observance and the regular use of the
Prayer-book in its plainer outlines, would quite naturally be per-
plexed. But in fact there were more serious causes of difference
than small things like these. The Bishop would not ordain the
About English lay missionaries unless he might also locate them without
locations, ^-eference to the Society, and he required them to sign a pledge to
go wherever he told them ; and as this would have been contrarj^
to the procedure arranged with the Bishop of Calcutta and
embodied in the " H. V." document,! the Committee would not
" present " candidates while that condition was insisted on. Here,
* See, however. Chapter LXVII. t See p. 423.
The BisHor^ the Colony^ and the Mission 433
again, it may fairly be said that the Bishop, regarding himself as Part V.
the general of an army, would naturally expect to post his clergy 1^41-48.
out according to his discretion ; while on the other hand the ^^^'" ^^'
Society would naturally desire to work its Mission on its own
plans, as it was doing in other parts of the world. The Bishop,
again naturally, preferred the S.P.G. arrangements, which gave
him unconditional grants of money for clergymen of his own
selection. The two systems are both legitimate enough. Both have
their merits, and both have their disadvantages. Why should
it be necessary to criticize either Society ? The difference with the
C.M.S. was settled l)y the formation of a Central Committee of
missionaries, with tlie Bishop as chairman, to which was com-
mitted the ordinary arrangements for location, subject to the
control of the Home Committee in cases affecting the general
policy of the Mission. But again, when the men had been
ordained deacons, this still left large districts unprovided with
ministers who could administer the Holy Cominunion ; and the About or-
Bishop, with his high ideas of the office of a priest, required for '^'"at'ons.
ordination to it a more advanced scholarship than could be attained
by men in middle life who had been labouring for years as lay
agents among a barbarous people, and knew a great deal more of
Maori than of Latin or Greek." We can appreciate the Bishop's
desire to maintain the standard of learning among his presbyters,
while we can see the disadvantage of his policy in an infant
Church scattered over a country as large as England ; a policy
which not only limited the number of English clergymen in full
orders, but resulted in the postponement for many years of the His back-
ordination of Maoris even to the diaconate. Selwyn was ten ,^^J^dTin^-
years in his diocese before admitting an English deacon to priest's ing Maoris,
orders ; eleven years before ordaining the first Maori deacon ; f
twenty-four years before giving a Maori priest's orders. The
dilemma applies to all successful Missions. You cannot main-
tain anything like an English standard of scholarship for
ordination, and at the same time provide a rapidly-growing
Native Church with clergy who are either of the Native race
themselves or at least fluent in its language. Bishop Selwyn
chose one alternative. Other bishops have chosen the other.
It is always a difficult task to steer between Scylla and
Charybdis.
On the general question of episcopal authority in details, the
* One man from Sydney, Mr. Puckey, was never even ordained deacon, but
laboured faithfully for fifty-live years as a humble lay agent. Yet the Bishop
chose him as one of a Committee of four to revise the Maori Prayer-book,
because of his intimate knowledge of Maori idiom.
■j" " The step was taken Avith small encouragement from the majority of the
older missionaries " {Lije of Sehuyn, vol. ii. p. 19). Pages could be filled with
contemporary letters disproving this remark ; even on the very opposite page
of the same work is a letter from Ai-chdeacon Abraham, saying that "one or
two of the Church Mission clergy pressed on the Bishop very much the
importance of making a beginning."
VOL. I. F f
434 New Zealand:
Part V. missionaries were by no means of one mind. The brothers
1841-i8. Wilhams, and Hadfield, stood very much by the Bishop. Henry
^^^" " ■ Wilhams, it is true, was a strong Protestant : he was at this time
sending home to his brother-in-law, E. G. Marsh, subscriptions to
decidedly combative Protestant societies in England ; -'= but as an
old naval officer he believed in authority and discipline, and
Selwyn owed more to him than he ever acknowledged or even
knew. But some of the laymen, and one or two of the clerical
missionaries, complained much to the Home Committee ; and the
Selwyn result was that when the Bishop desired to rent from the Society
wafmate. *^® entire mission premises, buildings and farm, at Waimate, for
his own puri^oses, the Committee declined to divert the station
from its previous use. Naturally, again, the Society incurred
blame for this ; and it is impossible to read the letters of the period
without sympathizing with Selwyn in having to move from the
spot which had been his headquarters for two years, and where
his college had been started. At the same time, the Committee
could hardly be expected to view with favour the transformation
of the most important C.M.S. station in New Zealand,! in the
midst of a host of Native Christians who were the fruit of the
Mission, into a kind of ecclesiastical collegiate establishment with
a tone and colour quite different from the tone and colour of a
C.M.S. Mission. How would the Cowley Fathers have liked
Mr. Pennefather and his Mildmay Institutions to be set down in
their midst at Poona ? \
So it came to pass that in 1844 Bishop Selwyn accepted from
the Society, as a sort of "compensation for disturbance," one of
the two mission schooners, the Flying Fish (which proved very
useful to him),^; and moved to Auckland, the rising seat of Govern-
ment. He established his headquarters, and St. John's College,
at Tamaki, four miles from the town ; where the exquisite chapel
associated with himself and Bishop Patteson so deeply interests
the visitor to-day. The move proved to be really very much to
his advantage ; for within six months of his leaving Waimate, the
mission premises there were occupied by troops, and some of the
buildings were burnt down. A punishment on the C.M.S. ! says
some one. Well; but Waimate revived again immediately, and
amid all the wars and apostasies and miseries of subsequent
history it never again saw an armed force. It has remained ever
since a centre of peaceful Christian work.
* Life of H. Williams, vol. ii. p. 76.
f In 1844 there were, at this station, a central church, and twelve" small
chapels in neighbouring villages ; total average congregations, 1000 Maori
Christians ; communicants, 380 ; 24 schools, with 720 scholars ; baptisms in.
the year, adults 252, children 99. There were 40 acres of wheat, and 180
sheep ; and the flour-mill yielded 48,000 lbs. of flour.
t This, of course, is only an illustration. It is not meant to suggest that
Bishojj Selwyn's views and ways were those of the Cowley Fathers j nor yet
that the C.M.S. missionaries were of precisely Mildmay type.
§ Life of Selieyn, vol. i. p. 187.
The Bishop^ the Colony^ and the Mission 435
Captain Hobson had died in 1848, and was succeeded by Captain Part V.
Fitzroy, R.N., an excellent man and good friend to the Mission. 1841-48.
His appointment was a happy response to the following delightful ^^^P- ^'^^
letter from the head chief of one of the tribes : — Ma^~
appeal to
" Good Lady Victoria,— How farest thou ? Great is my love to you. the Queen,
who are residing in your country. My subject is, a Governor for us and
the foreigners of this Island. Let him be a good man. Look out for a
good man— a man of judgment. Let not -a troubler come here. Let
not a boy come here, or one pufted up with pride. AVe, the New
Zealanders, shall be afraid. Let him be as good as this Governor who
has just died. Mother Victoria, let your instructions to the foreigner
be good. Let him be kind. Let him not come here to kill us, seeino-
that we are peacealjle. Formerly we were a bad people, a murdering
people : now we are sitting peaceably. We have left off the evil. It was
you appointed this line of conduct, and therefore it is good to us.
Mother, be kind.
" From me,
" Werowero."
All this time, the relations between the colonists and the Maoris Colonists
were becoming more and more strained. Disputes about pur- Maoris :
chases of land were incessant ; and the commissioners appointed "lo^e
to see justice done found the native customs of tenure exceedingly '^''^''"'^'^^•
complicated, while the Maoris fretted at the consequent delays.
Then some of the settlers whose unprincipled designs were thwarted
by the Treaty of Waitangi tried to prejudice the Maoris against the
Treaty and to stir them up to disloyalty. Drink and immoraliliv,
too, were bringing the inevitable misery and bloodshed in the'ir
train. " The influence of the immoral Enghsh living in the land,"
wrote the Bishop, "is the greatest difficulty I have to contend
with ; as the Natives continually object to me the lives and conduct
of my own countrymen." - The evil was enhanced by the
prosperity caused by the sudden and large demand for labour, n,nd
the ready market and high prices for produce to be obtained at
Auckland and Wellington. But it is touching to find the Christian
Maoris who were engaged in the growing traffic doing their best to
keep out of the way of ungodly Europeans. In this they wej-e
assisted at Auckland by Mr. (afterwards Sir W.) Martin, the Chief
Justice, and Mr. Swainson, the Attorney-General, who put up hnts
round their own dwellings, where the converts could" sojourn in
peace and engage in daily worship according to their custom. f
But all Englishmen wdio befriended the Maoris became unpopu-
lar with the bulk of the settlers ; and most unpopular of all were
the missionaries, especially the Bishop and Archdeacon Henrv
Williams. "You will not be deeply affected," wrote Selwyn,
" by the report of my unpopularity. The real subject of grief is
the injury done to religion by the un-Christian feelings and
language which many permit and justify in themselves."
* Curteis's Lije of Bishop Selwyv, p. 73.
t Southerji Cross a)id a^outhern Crocii, >i 228.
F f 2
436
New Zealand:
Part V.
1841-48.
Chap. 28.
The first
outbreaks.
Heke's
War.
Forbear-
ance of
Maoris.
Henry
Williams
misjudged,
At last outbreaks occurred. In the south, the accidental
shooting of a Maori woman led to a massacre of white men by
still heathen Natives by way of reprisal, amid shouts from the
chiefs of ' ' Farewell the light ! Farewell the day ! Come hither
night ! " and in the north, a warlike chief named Heke cut down
the flagstaff at the settlement of Kororareka as a protest against
British rule. This latter incident led to a little local war ; and it is
noteworthy that Heke was finally defeated by the English troops
through their attacking his fortified ixili on a Sunday, while his
men inside were engaged in Christian worship. Moreover, when
the Maoris captured and burnt the town of Kororareka (March,
1845) they behaved with a forbearance that would have done
credit to European troops, and was in striking contrast to their
own customs only a few years before. The Bishop thus described
it :—
" Two officers captured and sent back unhurt ; one woman taken and
sent back with an escort under a flag of truce ; the bodies of the slain
respected ; the inhabitants of the town allowed to land during the
plunder and take away such portions of their property as they wished.
. . . The wounded and the women and children allowed to embark
without molestation ; after the explosion of the fortified house, the
whole force sufi'ered to retreat on board the ships without a shot being
fired ; guards placed to protect the houses of the English clergyman and
the French bishop."
But th(> respect paid by the insurgents to the missionaries only
made the latter more suspected by the colonists and by others.
Lieutenant Philpotts, a son of the famous Bishop of Exeter, "to
whose hasty and ill-judged order to fire upon the town the
disasters at Kororareka appear to have been in a great measure
due,"''' called Archdeacon Henry Williams "Traitor" to his
face, when, at the risk of his own life, the Archdeacon was
conveying the wounded captain of the ship from the shore in a
boat. The lieutenant was killed in the same war ; and Williams,
again at personal risk, went into the native jyali, and though not
allowed to take away the body, cut off a lock of the dead man's
hair and sent it to his friends.! Higher officers thought differently
of the Archdeacon. Governor Fitzroy, who had laboured hard in
the cause of peace and justice, indignantly repudiated the charge
of treachery which some were copying the lieutenant in suggesting,
and called Williams "the tried, the proved, the loyal, the inde-
fatigable." :[ And no wonder; for Williams and his brethren
undoubtedly saved the Colony from destruction. At one point
of Heke's War tlie British troops were defeated with heavy loss,
and for some months the white settlements were practically
defenceless. The excitement among the Maoris was great ; and
they could easily have overwhelmed by the mere force of numbers
the scattered and discouraged colonists. What was it that warded
* Dean Jacobs, Ch^irch Hisiory of New Zealand, p. 137.
t Ihid., p. 138. X Life of H. Williams, vol. ii. p. 106.
The Bishop^ the Colony^ and the Mission 437
otf so disastrous a stroke? It was Christianity. Tlie same gentle, Part V.
unobtrusive, yet powerful influence which prepared New Zealand 1841-48.
for colonization, preserved the infant settlements from destruction. ^^'^P- ^8.
The missionaries unceasingly exerted themselves to tranquillize
the various chiefs ; strongly tempted as they were to join Heke,
they remained loyal to the Queen and to the Church ; Heke
was left alone, and was easily crushed when reinforcements
arrived.
Peace was restored ; but the little war had called the attention ^ew Zea-
of the British Parliament to New Zealand, and a Select Com- in'paHia-'^^
mittee, presided over by Lord Howick, pronounced, by a majority '"^"*-
of one, against the Treaty of Waitangi, to the dismay of the
Church Missionary Society, the Bishop, the Governor, and all
who valued the cause of fair and truthful dealings with the Maoris.
The Society made a strong protest to Lord Stanley (afterwards
the Earl of Derby, and Premier), then Colonial Secretary; and
he practically threw over the Select Committee's Eeport. But
Fitzroy was recalled, and Captain (afterwards Sir) George Grey
sent out as Governor. England has never had an abler pro-
consul in her colonies than Sir George Grey, and to this day he Siro.
is justly honoured. But he began unfortunately in New Zealand. ^^^^'
He came at once under the influence of the New Zealand Com-
pany, reversed many of the best acts of his predecessor, gave
credence to the jealous and bitter accusations brought against the
missionaries, and charged them — especially Henry Williams — with
being the real cause of Heke's War. He indited a " secret
despatch " to Mr. Gladstone, who had succeeded Lord Stanley
as Secretary for the Colonies, embodying this and other serious
charges against them.
In the very month when this despatch was written, June, 1846,
Peel went out of office ; the Whigs came in under Lord John
Eussell ; and the Colonial Office was given to Earl Grey, the very Eari Grey's
Lord Howick who had carried in the Select Conmiittee the con- pouiy"^
demnation of the Treaty of Waitangi. He at once proceeded to
carry out his own views and those of the New Zealand Company.
A new Charter for the Colony was sent out, with certain famous
Instructions appended, which virtually took the greater part of
the lands that belonged to the Native tribes and were guaranteed
to them by the Treaty of Waitangi, and made them Crown lands,
saleable to the highest bidder for the profit of the State. Details,
of course, cannot be explained here ; but this description is
substantially correct. The right-minded part of the colonist
community w^ere aghast ; the Chief Justice, the Bishop, the
missionaries, all protested ; Archdeacon H. Williams declared
that the Instructions gave the lie to all his assurances to the
chiefs which had induced them to acknowledge the Queen's
sovereignty ; and the Bishop said he would no longer be identified
with the Government by taking a salary from them. Mr. Joseph
Hume, the economist M.P., called him a "turbulent priest."
438 New Zealand :
Part V. Lord Grey, indeed, sent him out a personal complimentary
cf^^~28 ™®^^^g®' ^^^^^ ^6 wrote, "I would rather he cut me in pieces
lap^ . 1^]^^^ induced me by compliments to resign the Natives to the
tender mercies of men who avow the right to take their land, and
who would not scruple to use force for that purpose." -■' He and
the missionaries, however, did their best to reassure the alarmed
Maoris, and thus averted another war ; and Governor Grey found
himself obliged to let the Instructions lie dormant, and not act
upon them at all.
Meanwhile, the action of Governor Grey and Earl Grey in
another matter brought fresh and serious trouble upon the
Mission ; which brings us to the Missionary Lands Question.
The Lands The question arose in this way. The New Zealand Mission
Question. ^^^.^^ from the first in a totally different position from those in
tropical countries, in that the climate was one in which the
missionaries might expect to live in health without furloughs in
England, and in which their families could be brought up with
a view to the permanent settlement of succeeding generations.
It will have been seen from previous chapters in this History
that even in India and Africa a considerable proportion of the
early missionaries lived and died in their fields of labour
without ever coming home ; but, except in very few cases, they
could not settle their children there. New Zealand was different.
^o^JTid ^^^^ Society, indeed, undertook to care for such children as
mis- might be sent home ; but the parents very reasonably preferred
rn°New^ to bring them up there. Then the healthy climate and the
educate^ temperate habits of the missionaries naturally resulted in the
and pro- rearing of large families ; and this proved a great advantage to
thli/"*^ the rising Colony, providing it with young men and women
children? brought up Under Christian infiuence and teaching, many of
whom came in after years to be in the front rank of the
colonial population. The Williams families, in particular, have
grown in seventy years into quite a clan, and many of the
members are now amongst the most highly respected in the
country and the Church. But how were the children provided
for in the first instance ? The Society, according to its practice,
made small allowances for them during childhood ; but as the
boys grew up, how were they to be occupied '? A few became
mission teachers and ultimately missionaries ; but naturally the
majority needed secular occupation. Trades and professions had
little opening in the early days ; but the vast stretches of un-
cleared land invited the industrious settler and farmer. The
Settle them natural and the right course was to place the young people
iTnd!^ upon the land ; and the land had to be bought from the Maori
owners. At this point, rather than copy from the statements
on the subject from time to time put forth by the Society, it will
* Lije of Bishop Sehuyn, vol. i. p. 275.
The Bishop^ the Colony^ and the Mission' 439
be well simply to extract the explanation by an impartial writer, Part Y.
Dean Jacobs : ■•'■ — 1841-48.
Crmp. 28.
'^ Who shall say that [the parents] were blaine\vc)rthy if . . . in preference
to seeking for their sons any chance employment that might be found in
the vitiated atmosphere of the irregular settlements that fringed the
coasts, they desired to settle them upon the land, and train them up as
useful colonists, practical teachers, and patterns of civilization to the
surrounding Natives ? Had they taken advantage of their position and Did the
influence to possess themselves of an exorbitant quantity of land, they ^'ig|'°""
might well be deemed deserving of censure ; but if the amount acquired defraud the
by them seemed large in the aggregate, it was simply because the Natives?
families of the missionaries had so increased as to form no inconsiderable
portion of the community. In 1844 the families numbered twelve, and
the children [and granH children] one hundred and twenty. It should
be borne in mind also that the missionary purchases were made at a
time when the colonization of New Zealand was not dreamt of.
" But what was the case in New South Wales ? There, in an already
thriving colony, we find that no lands were purchased by the clergy ;
but that was for a very sufficient reason : the Government made a free
grant to its chaplains of land at the average rate of IHOO acres for each
child — a very much larger amount than was ever claimed by any mis-
sionary in New Zealand, and very nearly double the quantity unanimously
awarded by the council under Governor Fitzroy to the Rev. Henry
Williams.
" If, again, they had abused their opportunities to acquire land at an
unfair price, they would have been entitled to no mercy. But so far
from this being the case, it was proved upon inquiry that they gave for
their land more than thirteen times as much as the agents of the
Government gave at a later period, when, owing to colonization, land
had grown in value ; and no less than eighty times as much as was given
by the New Zealand Company. Neither was the land they purchased
specially good ; it was mostly bush land, which had been cultivated and
abandoned by its original possessors, as supposed to have been worked
out. Besides all this, it must be added that in no solitary instance did
the Natives complain of being unfairly dealt with by the missionaries."
It will be gathered from this extract that complaints had been
made of the amount of land that had been purchased by the
missionaries. This was so ; and the Society at home had had J^^\^lf
to publish a full explanation of the circumstances, and had also the case.
issued, when the Colony was first established, and before the
Bishop went out, stringent regulations for the missionaries'
guidance. In two or three cases, individuals among them —
one especially, a lay agent from Sydney, not known personally
to the Committee — had purchased tracts of land at the request
of the Natives, with a view to the settlement of quarrels
among them. This, though done with the best motives, was
not approved by the Committee, being likely to increase the
hostile feelings of the colonists. In 1843 a Court of Land
Claims was established by Governor Fitzroy, which heard all
complaints ; and the result was that the various cases were
easily and satisfactorily settled. The quantity of land the pos-
* Church History of Neiv Zealand, p. 142.
440
N'eh' Z/-:ALAyD.
Part V.
1841-48.
Chap. 28
Governor
Grey's
secret
despatch.
Alarm of
C.M.S.
Committee,
session of which by C.M.S. missionaries was confirmed by the
Court came out less than half what was allowed in New South
Wales for girls and less than one-fourth what was allowed for
boys ; and it was shown that the average price they had paid
for it was 3s. Id. per acre, most of the purchases having been
made long before the Colony was established, and while war and
savagery still prevailed. But the regulation price fixed when the
Land Court was formed, and which was paid by many purchasing
colonists, was tJtreej^ence cm acre. Here the narrative ought to
stop. The upright and honourable dealings of the missionaries
had been vindicated, and there should have been an end of the
complaints. But the young men, their sons, to whom the various
holdings were now transferred, were industrious and clever, and
farmed them so successfully that they were becoming prosperous
men. This caused jealousy ; and the great trouble was yet to
come.
Early in 1847 the C.M.S. Committee were startled and shocked
by a communication from Lord Grey, enclosing the " secret
despatch " from Governor Grey already alluded to. This " secret
despatch " stated that the land claims of several influential
persons in New Zealand, some of them Government officials and
some of them missionaries, were " not based on substantial justice
to the Aborigines or to the British settlers " — although they had
been finally settled by the Land Court three years before. And
further, that, on account of the discontent of the Natives, the
claimants could not " be put in possession of the lands without a
large expenditure of British blood and money "■ — whereas they
were at the very time in quiet and undisturbed possession. " The
only step," justly observes Dean Jacobs, " which could possibly
have led to bloodshed would have been an attempt by the Govern-
ment to eject them" — so popular were they among the Natives.
But the C.M.S. Committee naturally gave credence to official
statements, and were greatly alarmed. They immediately sent
the copy of the " secret despatch " out to New Zealand, and gave
positive orders that every missionary was at once (1) to accept
the joint decision of the Governor and the Bishop as to the
quantity of land he was to retain for himself, (2) to transfer the
rest absolutely to his children or otherwise dispose of it, (3) except
as to any portion claimed by the Natives, which was to be given
up entirely.
These were no doubt excellent instructions, but they were based
on insufficient knowledge. First, there was no portion disputed
by the Natives ; secondly, the possessions confirmed by the Land
Court had mostly been already all transferred to the children,
some of whom were now married men with families of their own.
The receipt, therefore, of the resolutions caused the missionaries
no difficulty. Archdeacon H. Williams expressed entire agreement
with them, and declared that they would not require the award of
the Governor and the Bishop, as they would retain notli'nuj for
The Bishop^ the Colony^ axd the Af/ssroy 441
themselves, but transfer all that had not been transferred already. I^-^^t V.
But he and his brethren were indignant at the imputations of the p[^^~^'
" secret despatch," and still more so when it came out that the ^^
Governor had written again to the Colonial Office, and also to the Henry
Society, charging the missionaries with being the chief cause of ^JlgnTnt.
Heke's War, and affirming that "unless some of them were
removed, there would never be peace in the Northern District."
"The missionaries," wrote the Archdeacon, " shrink with horror
from such a charge, and are prepared to relinquish their claims
[i.e. the lands in possession ; there were no new claims'] altogether,
upon it being shown that these claims would render the possibility
of such an awful circumstance as the shedding of one drop of
human blood."
Naturally the Archdeacon, for himself and his brethren, de-
manded an inquiry into the truth of such serious charges.
" Sliould I fail to scatter them to the winds," he wrote, " I will
resign my duties in New Zealand." He appealed to the Governor :
the Governor did not answer his letter. He appealed to Lord
Grey : Lord Grey refused, saying that an inquiry would be an
affront to the Governor. He appealed to Lord Chichester, as
President of C.M.S. ; but the Committee dared not oppose the
Colonial Office, and said it was " impossible to institute inquiries
on the subject." He appealed to Bishop Selwyn, who had hitlierto Seiwyn-s
defended the missionaries on this land question ; and the Bishop's attitude,
action it would take much space to explain. We must in justice
to him bear in mind that he did not like the possession of land
by the missionaries and their families at all. For one thing, he
desired to attract the young men to his college, in hopes of training
them for service in the Church ; and then, as before stated, he
wished them to be at his own disposal, to be sent to any part of
the country at his discretion ; and obviously the possession of
land by them would to some extent hinder this. What he did
was, first, to appeal to the missionaries to teach their sons " to
renounce the barren pride of ownership for the moral husbandry
of Christ's Kingdom in the harvest-field of souls," urging that
" there is a Christian meekness and a)i active zeal by which the
Christian may inherit the earth, though he have no other posses-
sion in it than a grave." Admirable counsel for a missionary ;
yet if a young man is not a missionary Ijut a farmer, who would
think of laying it upon him as a Chi-istian duty that he should
abandon his farm ? It is no discredit to him to keep and to use
what has come to him in a legitimate way. It was one thing to
offer to abandon just rights if by keeping them the peace of the
country was endangered ; it was another thing to be expected to
do so without a shadow of evidence that there was any such risk,
and in the teetli of a refusal even to inquire concerning it. Then
the Bishop interpreted the Society's resolutions in a sense different
from that understood by the missionaries, and certainly different
from what the Committee intended ; and thereupon he called on
442 New Zealand:
^ha-\-Ir ^^^em to deliver up the title-deeds unconditionally, and accept
Chap 28 ^""'h^tsver the Governor might afterwards allot to them.
L ' Some of them now gave way rather than have further con-
troversy; but Archdeacon H. WiUiams declined, so long as the
grave charges against the brethren, and himself in particular, were
neither proved nor withdrawn. With him it was no longer a
question of property, but of character. In the case of one of the
lay agents, Mr. G. Clarke, the Governor sued him before the
Supreme Court. He declined to defend the action, but quietly
awaited the result; and the Chief Judge decided in his favour.*
Meanwhile, the refusal of Henry Williams to hand over the title-
deeds had been communicated to England ; the Bishop had
written to the Society strongly against him ; the Colonial Office
was pressing Lord Chichester ; and on November 20th, 1849, the
Committee, in deep sorrow, but distracted by the contrary opinions
expressed on all sides, and determined at all costs to set the
Henry Society right with the Government, passed a resolution dissolving
discon'"^ their connexion with Archdeacon Henry Williams,
nected. Ti\m is but a Very brief and condensed account of a long and
Who was painful controversy. Henry Williams's biographer, Mr. Carleton,
to blame? .^ ^^^^^ Zealand gentleman, afterwards Vice-Chancellor of the
New Zealand University, devotes almost one whole volume to it,
and defends him at every point, blaming severely the Governor,
the Bishop, the Colonial Office, and the C.M.S. Committee.
Dean Jacobs substantially endorses his view. Mr. Tucker,
Selwyn's biographer, passes over the controversy, but quotes the
Bishop's advice to the missionaries above referred to. In this
History we are only concerned with the Society and its agents.
On the general question of the lands enough has already been
said. As regards the charges against the missionaries of en-
dangering the peace of the country, they can only be characterized
as utterly absurd ; and it is a mystery how Governor Grey came
to make such statements. That Archdeacon Williams was
justified in the position he took up, and from which he never
moved, that the character of himself and his brethren was at
stake, is beyond doubt ; but it is generally a hopeless task to bring
to book persons in official position — or indeed any other position —
who make accusations without supplying the evidence. Nothing is
harder to bear ; but most of us have had to bear it in some form.
Henry Williams would perhaps have won a greater victory than
he ultimately did (as we shall see) if, instead of vindicating himself
and censuring his accusers in caustic and vehement letters, he
had ignored the charges and left the Lord to plead his cause.
As for the Society, it is impossible to feel that the Committee
were right throughout. A careful perusal of the Minutes for
several years, with side-lights from letters, &c., shows the extreme
* Tliis decision was reversed on appeal to tlie superior court in England;
))iit siilisequently tlie reversal was itself I'eversed.
The Bis//or^ thk Colox)\ Ayi^ the M/ssiox 443
perplexity they were in, and their anxious desii'e to be just ; but Part V.
they were certainly misled as to facts, and perhaps unduly ready p,^"*^~^'
to defer both to the Government and to the Bishop, as well as ''^*'
over-sensitive to public opinion. The " man in the street," the
ordinary newspaper reader, of course believed the official de-
spatches; and the Committee, for the credit of the Society, shrank
from shielding missionaries from censure which only a close and
careful inquiry could prove to be undeserved.
But the time did come when right was done. In order to finish
the narrative, it is necessary to go forward a little into suc-
ceeding years. Henry Williams's l)rother, Archdeacon William wniiam
Williams, came to England, to explain matters to the Committee, defends
His statement in refutation of Governor Grey's charges was Henry,
conclusive,''' and tlie Committee, in May, iJSol, passed a strong
resolution entirely exonerating the missionaries from them, and
recognizing to the full the value of their services to the Colony as
well as to tlie Maoris. But they could not see their way to
reinstating Henry Williams. In their judgment he had done
wrong, and there was "no sufficient reason" for rescinding the
resolution disconnecting him. The opinion, however, of many
leading friends in the country began to change. The facts
gradually became known ; and the Committee were beset with
appeals from all sides for a reconsideration of the Archdeacon's
case. At length an opportunity came for restoring him gracefully,
In 1854, Sir George Grey (as he now was) and Bishop Sehvyn Seiwyn
both came to England. The chief subjects of their intercourse appeauo
with the Society will come before us hereafter. Here it need c.m.s.
only be said that Sir George, without confessing his mistakes —
that was too much to expect — did his best to remedy them by
warmly testifying to the high character and good influence of the
missionaries ; and that the Bishop expressed a personal wish that
the Archdeacon should be reinstated. I The Committee thereupon,
on July 18th, unanimously passed a resolution reaffirming their
"confidence in Archdeacon Henry Williams as a Christian mis- Henry
sionary," "rejoicing to believe that every obstacle is providen- rei'ns'fated.
tially removed against his return into full connexion with the
Society," and asking him, "receiving the resolution in the spirit
in which it is adopted, to consent to return," so that " all personal
questions on every side may be merged in one common object of
strengthening the cause of Christ in the Church of New Zealand."
And in forwarding the resolution Henry Venn wrote, — " Be
assured that if the Committee have in any respect misunderstood
* This most able documont is printed at lenj^th in the Life of H. Williaiiis,
vol. ii. p. 261.
t In tlio pulilishod resolution, only the Bishop's wish is referred to. The
liiofjrapher of lleiiiy Williams comments on wh.at seems the sipiHlifant absence
of Sir (t. Grey's name ; and Dean Jacobs oidy " presumes" that the Governor
must have concurred. Hut the orifjinal Minutes reconl that the request was
made by both the Hishoj) ami the (iovernor.
444 New Zealand:
Part V. your actions or mis-stated facts, it has been unintentional on their
1841-48. part, as they are most desirous of doing full justice to your
"''" ■ character, and to the important services which you have rendered
to the cause of Christ." Thus the veteran missionary was
vindicated and restored, to the satisfaction of all who knew him in
New Zealand. He never returned to England, but laboured on
with unchanging devotion till his death in 1867.
It has been felt necessary to narrate these facts, even so long
afterwards, partly because there are still allusions in current
books to the supposed land-greed of the New Zealand missionaries,'''
and partly because excellent lessons for our own or any other
time may be draw^n from the narrative. Moreover, there has
probably been no matter in the whole history of the Society that
has given the Committee more trouble ; and this work would
therefore be quite incomplete if it were passed over.
It is right here to say that Sir George Grey, though undoubtedly
he fell into mistakes in this matter, proved himself upon the
whole a hearty friend to the Mission, and an upholder of the
Treaty of Waitangi and the rights of the Maori people. The
C.M.S. reports and periodicals at the time frequently spoke
warmly and justly in his praise ; and we shall see by and by
that he afterwards deserved, and received, still more confidence
and commendation.
To revert to the Mission itself. Two features of the work must
Maori not be passed over. One is the Maori Version of the Bible and
Prayer- Prayer-book. In 1836, William Williams had completed the
translation of the New Testament and the Morning and Evening
Services ; and a printing-press was busy, under a printer sent out
by the Society, Mr. Colenso, in producing thousands of copies.
Then came Eobert Maunsell (afterwards LL.D., and Archdeacon),
who began the Old Testament, for which his Hebrew scholarship
specially qualified him. When Bishop Selwyn went out, he
formed a Revision Committee, combining with W. WiUiams and
Maunsell two lay agents who had a singular familiarity with
colloquial Maori, Hamlin and Puckey. At a period later than
that now under review, further revision was undertaken by the
same two leaders, with William Williams's son Leonard (now
Bishop of Waiapu), and two Wesleyans ; and Mrs. Colenso, a
daughter of one of the lay agents from Sydney, rendered great
service, being " a very able and intelligent Maori scholar."
The other feature of the period calling for notice is the attempts
* It should be added, to make the story complete, that two lay agents had
also been disconnected : one of them, the Sj'dney man alluded to on p. 439,
some years before ; and the other Mr. George Clarke. In the latter case also
there was miscoiiception. The Committee thought he had "litigated," in
order to keep his lands ; but in reality it was the Governor who sued ]\hn, as
before mentioned, and he did not even defend the action, yet the decision was
ill liis favour. However tlic (lovcrnment gave him .an important post, so he
did not rejoin the Society. He was the father of Archdeacon E. B. Clarke.
book.
/
The Bishop^ the Coloxy, Axn the Mission 44:
of the French Romanists to pervert the Maori Christians. Bishop Part V.
W. Williams <,nves an account of them,-'= and the journals of the --Ir*^^"^*
missionaries at the time are full of references to them. The '"^''
policy of Rome in the nineteenth century is the same everywhere. French
It is to assail Christian converts rather than go to the un- pr°^i|*Jjis.
evangelized Heathen. In New Zealand the French priests had turb the
two great advantages. First, they could with truth affirm that no converts,
land-grabbers or troops were behind them. " Heke ! " said one of
them, addressing the insurgent chief when the little war was over,
" the Queen first sent you teachers, and then sent soldiers to
destroy you." Secondly, they could, as in other lands, allow the
maintenance of heathen usages which the Protestant missionaries
discouraged. The nominal Christians, therefore, who were now
becoming numerous, fell an easy prey to them at first. But as
the people became familiar with the Maori Scriptures, the priests Maoris
found themselves foiled with a weapon that never fails. At R^'j^^sh
Waimate the French Bishop said to a Maori Christian, " The teaching,
missionaries have houses, and wives, and children ; all their love
is for them ; but we have none, therefore our love is for you."
" Is it then wicked," asked the Maori, " for a missionary to have
a wife and children ? " "I am an apostle and bisliop of Christ,"
was the reply, " and I tell you it is." " But," rejoined the Maori,
" St. Paul also was an apostle, and he said a bishop ought to be
the husband of one wife." f A French priest challenged William
■\Villiams to the ordeal by lire, proposing that they should both
walk into flames, and see which of them God would keep intact.
The Maoris eagerly collected wood for the purpose, expecting him,
as the challenger, to try first ; but this he declined to do. The
apparent success of the French Mission was short-lived. Very
few Maoris permanently joined the Roman Church ; and the
victory was luiquestionably due to the widespread knowledge of
the Word of God. The indirect influence of Rome in later years
in aiding the lapse of a part of the nation into semi-Heathenism
will come before us hereafter.
A much more serious obstacle to the growth of true spiritual Growth
Christianity was the rapid development of the Colony, with the coiony :
increase of wealth, particularly when the gold discoveries in ^°[fes'*'^'
Australia caused a sudden demand for agricultural produce. New
Zealand could supply the gold-diggers with food. The gold-
diggers paid for it with gold. Both settlers and Natives in
New Zealand found themselves getting rich ; and the grog-shop
furnished an easy way of spending money. A younger generation
of Maoris was growing up, and falling a prey to the new
temptations. " Why," ask the critics of C.M.S., " were the
young neglected ? Why was an ' emotional religion ' considered
surticient, without systematic teaching and strict disciphne ?
* Christian it II among the Xew Zealander^, pp. 253, 280, 334, A'c.
t Bishop W. Williams, Hid., p. 281.
446 New Zealand:
Part V. Why were the confirmees presented to the Bishop mostly middle-
1841-48. aged people, while the lads and lasses were running wild ? And
^^^' ' why was only religion taught and not industry too ? " Here is
Bishop William Williams's reply : —
" The charge of an immense district was often left to one indi-
vidual. The case would be somewhat parallel if a clergyman were
required to itinerate between London and York on foot, and then
between London and Southampton, officiating at places on the road
varying in distance from ten to twenty miles ; and then, when he is
at home, having charge, in addition to other matters, of three hundred
candidates for baptism, and of seven hundred regular attendants at
Bible-classes, who had been left in the interval, not to the care of
competent curates, but to teachers who themselves required to be
taught the first principles of the oracles of God." *
And, as he goes on to explain, notwithstanding these difficulties
and disadvantages, schools were, with Government aid, being
established ; and these were definitely industrial schools, with
farms attached, and the boys were taught ploughing, reaping,
threshing, carpentry, &c., and the girls prepared for domestic life ;
— but unquestionably it was all on an inadequate scale.
Flourish- The Eastern District, which was William Williams's own sphere
EasTanV" ^^ work, was the most prosperous spiritually, just because it was
South- furthest removed from the colonial settlements ; but the Western
^^^^- District (as it was called, i.e. the far south-west), under O. Hadfield t
and E. Taylor, afforded conspicuous examples of high Christian
character. At Christmas (the New Zealand midsummer), 1846,
Taylor's \)^q converts, to the number of 2000, gathered from all parts of
Maoris. Mr. Taylor's district to Wanganui. Next day a missionary meeting
was held, and two Christian chiefs volunteered to carry the
Gospel to a hostile and still heathen tribe. They went, and were
both cruelly murdered ; and soon afterwards their places were
taken by two others. At the Christmas of 1848, seven hundred
English settlers gathered at Wanganui for horse-races. They
were puzzled at the absence of the Maoris. The Maoris, two
thousand of them, were at church, 710 remaining for Holy Com-
munion. At the neighbouring English church, the communicants
numbered fifteen. :]: The general results of the Mission are nowhere
Sir G. lietter summarized than in an address by Sir George Grey to the
Sstmfony. C.M.S. Committee when he came to England in 1854. The
official minute, revised by himself, is as follows : —
" Sir George Grey stated that he had visited nearly every station of the
Society, and could speak with confidence of the great and good work
* Christianity among the New Zealandei's, p. 346.
I Hadfield was greatly beloved by Bishop Selwyn, and frequent warm
notices of him occur in the pages of both Lives of the Bishop. But both omit
the fact that he was a C.M.S. missionary. He afterwards became Bislioj) of
Wellington and Primate of New Zealand.
X These and many other remarkable incidents, and a vast amount of
valuable information, are given in Mr. Taylor's two Avorks, The Pas^t and
I'r^. e- 1 of New '/leal.anJ, and Te Iha a Maui, or, Neic Zeahnid and. its Inhabitants.
Till-: Bisiior^ riir. Coi.oxv, anp the Mission 447
acc()in[ili.slic'(l by it in New Zealand : that lie believed that out nf the I'akt V.
Native population, estimated by himself at nearly 10(),(J0", tiiere were 1.S41-48.
not more than 10(10 who did not make a profession of Christianity ; that Cliaj). 28.
thouph he had heard doubts expressed about the Christian character of
individuals, yet no one tloubted the eflect of Christianity upon the mass
of the people, which liad been evidenced in their social improvement,
tluir friendly intercourse with Europeans, and their attendance upon
Divine worship ; that there was in many i)laces a readiness on the part
of the Natives to contribute one-tenth of the produce of their lal)our for
the support of their Christian teachers, and to make lil)eral tyrants of
land for the endowment of the schools ; that some of the Native teachers
were, and many, by means oi the schools, might be, (jualilied for actiiig
as Native pastors, if admitted to Holy Orders, and might be trusted in
such a position to carry on the good work among their countrymen, and
even to go out as Native missionaries to other islands of the Pacitic ;
that the great want in the Native Church at the present was a con-
solidation of the work, and its establishment upon a basis of self-support;
that it was impossible for a single ]iislu)p to accomplish svich a work,
from the extent and geographical isolation of the difterent parts of the
diocese; that he understood that it was the opinion of the Jiishop that
there should be four Jiishopries in the Northern Island, in which oi)inioii
he concurred; that the most suitable persons to be appointed to the
new sees were those he understood to have been reconunended by the
Bishop, namely, three of the elder missionaries of the Society, who had
commenced the work, and brought it to its present state: that the
appointment of these gentlemen would, he believed, give satisfaction;
tliat he believed nothing could induce the missionaries to desert the
Natives ; that they would rather give up their salaries and throw them-
selves upon Native resources ; that they possessed the full contidence of
the Natives, and were thoroughly accpiainted with their character : but
that, if the Society were now wholly to withdraw from New Zealand, the
work would, he believed, fall to pieces, and the Mission do an injury tt)
Christianity ; whereas, if the work should be consolidated and perfected,
as he hoped, the conversion of New Zealand would become one of the
most encom-aging facts in the modern history of Christianity, and a
pattern of the way in which it might be established in all other heathen
countries."
All this time Bishop Sehvyn was displaying the most unbounded Seiwyn's
energy, travelling all over the country, ministering to both colonists energy.^
and Natives, never sparing liimself, and, while often unpopular
with the former, universally lionoured by the latter, and also by
the missionaries, notwithstanding the occasional differences of
opinion. His two greatest works, however, were the organization
of the New Zealand Church and the foundation of the Melanesian The
Mission. The former will come before us hereafter. The latter MfssCfnl^"
properly lies outside the range of this History ; but it is impossible
to pass over without notice one of the most interesting missionary
enterprises of modern times. Seven voyages did Bishop Selwyn
make to the Melanesian Islands in five years. At first it was very
perilous work ; but he so completely succeeded in winning the
contidence of the islanders that on the seventh voyage he visitt-d
tiftv islands in perfect safety. He brought several lads, of different
tribes and languages, to be trained at bt. John's College ; but the
448 New Zealand : The Bishop^ the Colony^ and the Mission
Part V.
1841-48.
Chap. 28.
A living
Church
must be a
missionary
Church.
climate of New Zealand proved too cold for them, and it was not till
some years later that Patteson's plan of gathering them in Norfolk
Island met with more success. But what gives special impor-
tance to the Melanesian Mission is that Selwyn designed it as an
outlet for the foreign missionary zeal of the New Zealand Church.
" It seems to be an indisputable fact," he said in his first episcopal
charge, "that hoivever inadequate a Church may be to its oivn
internal loants, it must on noaccowit siis2:)cnd its missionary duties;
that this is in fact the circulation of its life's blood, ivhich ivould
lose its vital jwtver if it never flowed forth to the extremities, but
curdled at the hca,rt." If only every Church, however small, and
every parish, however poor, would act on the grand and true
principle thus set forth so forcibly by Bishop Selwyn, the whole
life of the whole Church would be quickened and invigorated as it
has never been yet since the days of the Apostles.
CHAPTER XXIX.
New Enterprises in Africa .- Niger Expedition, Yoruba
Mission, East Coast.
Story of Adjai the Slave-boy— Fowell Buxton's New Plans — The
River Niger — Prince Albert's First Speech — The Expedition of
1841 — Its Failure and Fruits — Buxton's Death — The Returning
Egba Exiles — S. Crowther's Ordination — Townsend and Crowther
to Abeokuta — Krapf in Shoa — His Voyage to Zanzibar — Mombasa
— Death of Mrs. Krapf — The Appeal of her Grave.
" Thou hast hrowjht a vine out of Egypt ; Thoit hast cast out the Heathen, avd
planted it. . . . She sent out her boughs unto the sea, and her brandie-^ unto the
river." — Ps. Ixxx. 8, 11.
E are now approaching the period of modern African Part V.
exploration. But the great discoveries that have 1841-48.
been so brilhant a feature of the geographical history '^^^"
of the last forty years, and of which three C.M.S.
missionaries wei'e the pioneers, do not come within
the field of vision just yet. The course of the most important
exploratory expeditions was, ultimately, not from West to East,
but from East to West. But this was not expected in the
'forties ; and the West Coast is still, in our present period, the
principal object in view. In this chapter important enterprises West
in West Africa come before us ; while before we close it, we ^[H^
shall have just a preliminary glimpse of the wonderful scenes
presently to be revealed on the eastern side of the Dark Con-
tinent.
The West African events of this period, in their missionary a Negro's
aspect, group themselves about the life-story of one remarkable "f^-story.
man — a Negro, a slave, the first African clergyman of our day,='=
and the first African bishop.
In the reign of George III. there was, about one hundred miles
inland from the port of Lagos, a town called Oshogun. The
hinterland of Lagos is inhabited by the Yoruba nation, numbering
some millions of souls, and consisting of several distinct tribes,
Egba, Jc'bu, Ondo, Ibadan, itc, all speaking the one Yoruba
language. From this country a considerable proportion of the
victims of the slave-trade were drawn ; and not a few, therefore,
of the lil)erated slaves at Sierra Leone belonged to one or other
* " Of our day" — not to forget or ignore Pliilip Quaque, the S.P.G. African
clergyman in the eiglitoenth century. See p. 24.
VOL. I. G 1,'
45© Neh- ENTERrniSES jn Afe/ca:
Part V. of the Yoruba tribes. In 1821, the town of Oshogun was
1841-48. destroyed by Fulah slave-hunters, and the Egba inhabitants
Chap. 29. carried away captive. Among the captives were the wife of an
The"b^ Egba who (it is supposed) fell fighting in defence of his home,
Adjai kid- and their three children, a boy of eleven years and two younger
napped, ^.^.^^ rj.^^^^. j^^y^ Adjai, was the future Bishop of the Niger.
During the next few months httle Adjai, separated, of course,
from mother and sisters, was the property in succession of five
masters, being bartered generally for tobacco and rum. One
dreadful fear haunted him through all these changes, and this
was lest he should be sold to the "white men," the Portuguese
slave-traders on the coast. The very thing he so much dreaded
w^as ordained by Him who governs all things according to the
counsel of His own will, to be the means of opening out to him a
career of liberty and usefulness far beyond his wildest imagina-
tions. His fifth master sold him to a Portuguese trader at
Lagos, and there he was chained in the old barracoon or slave-
shed upon the site of which now stands St. Paul's Church, until
shipped as the day when he was shipped as one of 187 slaves forming the
a slave, gargo of a vessel bound for Cuba or Brazil."''
rescued by The vcry ncxt day, the slaver was seized by H.M.S. Myrmidon,
ship" '^ belonging to the British squadron then patrolling the coast, and
commanded by Captain (afterwards Admiral Sir Henry) Leeke.f
One of her young officers who took part in the rescue w^as after-
Avards Commander v^mith, E.N. ; and his son. Lieutenant George
Shergold Smith, was the leader of the first missionary party to
Uganda in 1876. Sometimes we are permitted to see the links
that make up the wondrous chain of God's providential dealings.
Have we ever seen one more touchingly significant than this ?
The father is engaged in suppressing the slave-trade on one
coast of Africa, and helps to deliver a little Negro boy who be-
comes the great pioneer missionary of that side of the continent ;
the son, fifty-four years after, becomes the first messenger of the
Cross to penetrate Africa from the other side, — on a mission, too,
which has resulted in an immense extension of British influence
in Africa, and the consequent suppression of the slave-trade over
vast territories.:!:
On June 17th, 1822, the slaves rescued by the Myrmidon were
landed at landed at Sierra Leone, and distributed among the villages. The
Le^o"e, ^^oy Adjai was allotted to Bathurst ; and from the very first day
of his being put to school, he evinced a ready intelligence which
was unusual in the miserable victims of the slave-trade. One of
the schoolmasters he was under, an industrial instructor, was
J. W. Weeks, afterwards the second Bishop of Sierra Leone.
One future bishop taught the other future Ijishop the use of tlie
* The Portuguese ship was (happily) called the E^peranra, Felix,
f In after year.s Bp. Crowther knew Admiral Leeke well. See Vol. IT. p. 114.
+ Another interesting' link is that Commander Smith became i)i after years
agent of the Devonshire estates of Sir John Kennaway, now C.M.S. President.
Niger Exped/t/o.x, Yoruba Af/ssio.x, East Coast 451
plane and tlie cliisel. But in a liif^lier kind of knowlfdj^e siill Takt V.
young Adjai soon purchased to liiniself a good degree, lie 1hh-4>".
learned to know the Only True God, and Jesus Christ whom He ^'"'l*- ^^•
had sent ; and having given ample evidence that his heart as
well as his mind had embraced the Gospel, he was baptized on baptized,
l^ecember 11th, 1825, and named after a venerable clergyman in
England, whom we have met with before as one of the early
members of the Church Missionary Society/'' Samuel Crowther.
In 1826, one of the schoolmasters came to England, and
brought Crowther with him ; and for a few months the lad
attended the Parochial School in Liverpool Eoad, Islington. He
retvu'ned to Sierra Leone in the following year, just when Mr.
Haensel was organizing the Fourah Bay College ; and the very
first name on its roll of students is that of Samuel Crowther. He first
soon became an assistant teacher ; then a schoolmaster at Regent Bay'^^'^
(W. Johnson's old station) under Weeks ; and afterwards again a student,
tutor at the College, under the Rev. G. A. Kissling (afterwards
Archdeacon in New Zealand). In the published reports from
1830 onwards, his name frequently occurs as that of a faithful and
efficient agent of the Mission ; and that of his wife appears as married.
" Susanna Crowther, school-mistress." But the memorable year
1841, which we have before noticed as so great an epoch in the
history of the Church, was the year that witnessed Samuel
Crowther's first step towards the high position he afterwards
occupied.
When Fowell Buxton had achieved the great triumph of his
life by the abolition of West Indian slavery in 1833-34, he turned
his energetic mind to Africa itself. The slave-trade was still Slave-trade
rampant. Not that Wilberforce's victory in 1807 had been pant!^*"""
abortive. No British ships were now engaged in the traffic. But
Spanish, Portuguese, and Brazilian vessels were still carrying
cargoes of Negroes across the Atlantic ; and though the Britisli
cruisers caught some, the majority succeeded in eluding them.
What was to be done ? Early one morning in 1837, just before
Queen Victoria's accession, when staying at Earlham (the well-
known home of the Gurneys, near Norwich), Buxton walked into
a room where one of his sons was sleeping, and told him he had
been awake all night thinking of the slave-ti'ade, and " had hit Foweii
upon the true remedy for that portentous e\al." f It was this : — l^^edy.'
'' The deliverance of Africa is to be effected bi/ calling out her oicn
resources."
To the maturing of a plan for working out this principle he now
devoted his time and thought ; and after months of study and
inquiry, he printed a pamphlet in the form of a Letter to Lord
^Iell)ourne (then Premier), which he afterwards expanded into his
important work, TJie Slave Trade and its Eemedy. It set forth
* See J). 7*1. t I'ije of Buxtuii, j). 363.
G g 2
452 New Enterprises in Africa :
Part V. startling evidence of the immensity and the horrors of the existing
rh^^"tq' slave-trade ; it urged the strengthening of the British squadron,
^^' ' and the negotiating of treaties with native chiefs; and then it
proceeded to enlarge on the capabilities of Africa, and the possi-
bilities of developing her mineral and vegetable resources. The
Government was to do its part ; commercial companies were to
do theirs ; missionary societies were to add the work of evangeli-
The Bible zation. " It is the Bible and the Plough," said Buxton, "that
Plough. must regenerate Africa."
Only seven years before this, an event had occurred which
much helped to secure favour for Buxton's projects. The course
The River of the Eiver Niger had, in 1830, been determined by Lander. The
^^^^' history of this discovery is curious. That there was a great river
somewhere in the Western Soudan was known in the previous
century ; but in the edition of the Encycloi^s^dia Britannica
pubhshed in 1797, it was confounded with the Senegal, which
flows westward into the Atlantic Ocean. It was, however, on
July 21st of that very year, that Mungo Park struck its upper
waters near Segou, west of Timbuctoo. " I beheld," he says, " the
long-sought-for majestic Niger, glittering in the morning sun, as
broad as the Thames at Westminster, and flowing slowly to the
eastiuard." But still no one guessed where its embouchure was to
be found. Park was killed in the attempt to complete the ex-
plorations ; Clapperton died in making a similar attempt ; and not
until 1830 did Lander, having travelled overland from the Slave
Coast to Boussa, where Park had met his death, succeed in
descending the stream until he emerged, by one of the mouths
that form the Niger Delta, into the Gulf of Guinea. Most great
rivers have been discovered at their mouths, and their course
traced up-stream. The Niger w^as known at its upper waters long
before the tracing of its outflow into the sea.
Although a commercial venture up the river, made by that
persevering friend of Africa, Mr. Macgregor Laird, in 1832, had
proved a failure, the more intelligent of the British public fully
believed in the great opening for geographical and mercantile
Buxton's enterprise furnished by Lander's discovery. Of this feehng Buxton
proposa s. ^^^^ advantage. Armed with his pamphlet, he approached the
Government, and urged the fitting out of an expedition to go up
the Niger, and make a systematic beginning in the promotion of
such commerce and civilization as would, in the long run, destroy
the slave-trade. The Colonial Secretary in 1838 was Lord
Glenelg, the younger Charles Grant, whose excellent work when
at the India Office we have before seen. " I ought to know
something of Colonial Secretaries," wrote Buxton,- "for I have
worried each of them in succession for twenty years. . . . There
is not one of them who, in my estimation, has acted more con-
scientiously, or of whose anxiety to do justice to Negroes, Caffres,
* Life, p. 366.
Niger Expedition^ Yoruba Missiox^ East Coast 453
Hottentots, and Indians I feel more assurance than Lord Glenelf]^." Part V.
Then also Sir James Stephen, son of the James Stephen whom we J|^^^'^"
have seen as one of Wilberforce's associates and one of the '^
founders of the Church Missionary Society, and who was Henry
Venn's brother-in-law, was Permanent Secretary of the Colonial
Ollice ; so everything was favourable to Buxton's plans. Lord
Glenelg brought them before the Cabinet ; the Cabinet unani-
mously approved them ; and Buxton wrote to his son-in-law
Andrew Johnston, "Thank God! I say it with all my heart,
tliank God!" "■• But approval and action are not quite the same
thing. Lord Glenelg retired from office ; possibly Lord Melbourne's
celebrated question, "Can't you let it alone?" was put in this
case as in so many others ; and things did not move rapidly.
Besides which, it was not sufficient to convince the Cabinet: a
great part of the work was to be done by private enterprise ; and
this enterprise had to be set on foot and organized.
At length, in July, 1839, a new Society for the Civilization of
Africa was inaugurated. Bishop Blomfield, Lord Ashley, Sir
Eobert Inglis, and other influential men taking part ; and Samuel
Gurney, Dr. Lushington, and Mr. Gladstone joining. " Quite an
epitome of the State," wrote Buxton ; " Whig, Tory, and Radical ;
Dissenter, Low Church, High Church, tip-top Oxfordism, all
united." f The movement now grew apace ; and on June 1st, Great
1840, one of the greatest meetings ever held in Exeter Hall pushed meetfng,^
it into the front rank of the topics of the day. For Prince Albert, J^^-^^ '^t,
who had been married to the Queen not four months before, was
in the chair, supported by some five-and-twenty peers and bishops,
and a host of M.P.'s and leading laymen and clerg}-men. In
this his first speech before an English audience Prince Albert Pr["=e.
i " Albert s
said, Speech.
" I havo bct-n induced to preside at the Meeting; of this Society from a
conviction of its paramount imjiortance to the great interests of
humanity and justice. I deeply regret that the benevolent and per-
severing exertions of Enghmd to aboUsh the atrocious traffic in human
beings — at (Mice the desolation of Africa and the blackest stain on
civilized Europe — liave not as yet led to a satisfactory conclusion. I
sincerely trust that this great country will not relax its efforts initil it
lias, finally and for ever, put an end to a state of things so repugnant to
the principles of Christianity and to the best feelings of our nature. I
do tru.st tliat Providence will prosper our exertions in so holy a cause ;
and that, under the auspices of our Queen and her Government, we may,
at no distant period, be rewarded by the accomi)lisliment of the great
and humane object, for the promotion of which we have met this day."
Buxton himself moved the first resolution ; and he was followed
by Samuel Wilberforce, then Archdeacon of Surrey, with his
hereditary right to a foremost place on such a platform, and with
an eloquence even more captivating than that of his illustrious
father. Then came Sir Robert Peel, the leader of the Conservative
* Life, p. 373. t J^id., p. 380.
454
New Enterprises in Africa :
Part V.
1841-48.
Chap. 29.
The
scheme
criticized.
C.M.S.
action.
Opposition, to support a scheme promoted by the Whig Ministiy ;
the Bishops of Winchester and Chichester, the Earl of Chichester,
President of the C.M.S. ; the Marquis of Northampton, Lord
Ashley, Sir T. Dyke Acland, and several others. It was shortly
after this meeting that Fowell Buxton was created a baronet.'-^'
Meanwhile the Government were not idle. They were building
three new iron steamers expressly for the expedition, two of
which, when launched, received the names of the Albert and the
Wilberforce, the third being christened the Soudan. Lord John
Eussell, who was now Colonial Secretary, and Lord Palmerston,
who was Foreign Secretary, entered warmly into the plans ; and
the former wrote officially, —
" It is proposed to establish new commercial relations with those
African chiefs and powers within whose dominions the internal slave-
trade of Africa is carried on, and the external slave-trade supplied with
its victims. To this end, the Queen has directed her Ministers to
negotiate conventions or agreements with those chiefs and powers : the
basis of which conventions would be, first, the abandonment and absolute
prohibition of the slave-trade, and, secondly, the admission, for con-
sumption in this country, on favourable terms, of goods, the produce or
manufacture of the territories subject to them."
Several scientific men were engaged by the new African Society
to accompany the expedition ; and an Agricultural Association
organized by Buxton with the help of the Gurneys and some
other Quaker friends, raised £4000 to start a "model farm"
somewhere on the Niger. These plans called forth a good deal of
criticism. The Times distinguished itself by its vehement attacks
on the whole scheme ; and the Edinburgh Eoview followed suit.f
But Prince Albert was not moved from his attitude of hearty
approval. He visited the three ships in the Thames before they
sailed, and narrowly escaped drowning from an accident to his
boat..! As for Buxton, the motto of his family had been, " What-
soever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might," and the last
five words of this text was the motto attached to the arms which
he bore as a baronet.
But what had the Church Missionary Society to do with all
this ? From first to last it was in close alliance with Buxton in
his plans. The Niger would be a highway for the Gospel as well
as for legitimate trade. If " the Bible and the Plough " were to
combine to regenerate Africa, and if the new Agricultural Associa-
tion was to provide the plough, it was plainly the part of the
Church Missionary Society to provide the Bible. Accordingly
the Committee obtained leave to send two mission agents with
* Another interesting fact about this great meeting is that David Living-
stone was present He was then a young student under the London Missionary
Society. — Blaikie's Personal Life oj Livingstone.
t Dickens's clever caricature of the scheme, in his picture (in Bhak Hov.^c)
of Mrs. Jellyby and Borrioboola Gha, will of course be remembered.
X Life of Buxton, p. 443.
Nicer Exr/mrnox, Yoruba M/ss/ox, East Coast 455
the expedition, and for this service they selected J. F. Schiin a ^^^^^'J^-
German missionary at Sierra Leone with special Imguistic gifts, ^^^^^ -
and Samuel Crowther.
The expedition sailed on April 14th, 1841, and entered tlie Niger Ex.
mouth of the Niger on August 20th. Through the slimy man- p
grove swamps, with their fever-hreeding miasma, for the hrst
twenty miles— then through a region of dense tropical forest,
palms, bamboos, and gigantic cotton-trees— then past the hrst
plantations of plantains and sugar-cane, with here and there a
mud hut— the three vessels slowly steamed up the principal
channel of the river. At Abo, a hundred mUes up, and again at
Idda, another hundred miles further, treaties were concluded
with the chiefs for the suppression of the slave-trade and ot
human sacrifices, and for the promotion of lawful commerce.
Important information was collected touching the condition and
capabilities of the country ; and Schon gathered much linguistic
material which afterwards proved valuable. But the expedition
closed in sorrow^ and disappointment. A deadly fever struck the its trials,
crews, and forty-two white men out of one hundred and fifty died
in two months. Only one steamer, the Albert, got as far as Egan
(pronounced Egga), the highest point reached, some 350 miles
from the sea, the other two having been sent back full of invahds ;
and the Albert itself had at one time only three white men with
strength enough to work the ship. The proposed " model farm
was started at Lokoja, but ere long the men in charge had to
leave in shattered health ; and almost the only immediate result
of the first gallant attempt to " regenerate Africa " was the publica-
tion by the Church Missionary Society of Schon and Crowther s
Journals, which proved a valuable book, and most useful in after
^^The failure of the Niger Expedition as distinctly killed Fowell its failure.
Buxton as the Battle of Austerlitz killed Pitt. He sivrvived it
three years, but he was never the same man again. " He rarely
spote of the Expedition," says his son and biographer :" his
grave demeanour, his worn pale face, the abstraction of his
manner, and the intense fervour of his supplications that God
would 'pity poor Africa, --these showed too well the poignancy
of his feelings." - On the other hand, the Times was triumphant ;
the very name of the Niger Expedition became a byword and a
proverb to express hopeless failure ; and for twelve years pub he
opinion tolerated no further attempts to utilize the river, llie
promoters did not lose all heart : they held another meeting, to
which Lord John Eussell, now leader of the Opposition (Peel
having come in), had the courage to come and speak, boldly
asserting, against all cavils, the soundness of Buxton's schemes
and prophesving that the failure was only temporary; and
Samuel Wilberforce again eloquently pleaded for persevering and
* Life of lUiJcto)!, i>. IGG.
45^ New Enterprises in Africa :
Part V. patient effort in behalf of Africa. Buxton was not well enough
Cha^~29' ^° ^® present ; but in 1843 he was able to take part in the dissolu-
lap^ • tion of the Company. " I feel," he said, " as if I were going to
attend the funeral of an old friend." His own funeral was not
Death^of long delayed. He died on February 19th, 1845. But he was not
forgotten. No less than fifty thousand Negroes in Africa and the
West Indies subscribed to the fund for a monument to him ; and
the statue in Westminster Abbey is the result. Moreover, his
name and character and influence have been perpetuated in sons
and daughters, grandsons and granddaughters, great-grandsons
and great-granddaughters, who have been, and still are, the
friends of Africa and of every good and holy cause at home and
abroad.
ffaihire?'* Aiid Lord John Eussell was right. The failure of the Niger
Expedition was not final. In His never-failing wisdom, God
permitted it, perhaps as a lesson on the uncertainty of human
plans. Few projects for the benefit of mankind succeed, when
they are ushered in with a flourish of trumpets. It pleases God
to choose the weak things of the world to confound the mighty.
The day came when the Negro teacher who occupied so humble
a place in the Expedition became Bishop of the whole Niger
territory. The day came when English ladies of refinement
found that they could live and labour on the banks of the
fever- stricken river. The day came when a great Chartered
After days. Company not only developed the river district itself, but delivered
the great Hausa nation, in the heart of the Soudan, from the Fulah
slave-kidnappers who had oppressed them so long, and pro-
claimed the entire abolition of slavery in the vast region under its
control.
l/o"I Sierra Leone was now a prosperous settlement. The West
prospering. African is not great at agriculture, but he is a born trader ; and
many of the rescued slaves had become flourishing traffickers
along the coast. In 1839, a few of the most enterprising, who
belonged to the Yoruba nation before mentioned, purchased from
Government a small slave-ship which had been captured, named
her the Wilberforce, freighted her with English goods hkely to
attract buyers, and set sail for what was then known as the Slave
Coast, a thousand miles to the east of Sierra Leone, and the gate
into their own Yoruba country. Lagos being in the hands of a
hostile and slave-kidnapping tribe, they landed at Badagry,
quickly disposed of their cargo, filled their little vessel with the
produce of the country, and returned to Sierra Leone; and a
brisk trade speedily sprang up. A few years before this, the
remnant of the scattered Egbas whose lands had been ravaged
by the Fulah slave-raiders, as before mentioned, had come
together again and settled round a high isolated rock called
Olumo; and a great town of probably 100,000 souls was the
result, to which they gave the name of Abeokuta, or Under-stone.
sYicER ExrEDiTioN^ YoRUhA MISSION^ East Coast 457
The Sierra Leone traders heard of this revival of the Egba power, Part V.
and some, who belonged to that section of the Yoruba people, J|J^^^"tg
emigrated to Abeokuta. These had not been the most religious of ^^_^
the professing Christians at Sierra Leone ; but in a wholly sierra
heathen country they began to long after their old church services, J;|ders at
and they sent to the Sierra Leone missionaries, begging them^ to Abeokuta.
come and provide Christian ministrations for them and teaching
for the Heathen population.
In the meanwhile, God was preparing the instrument for this
extension of the work. The C.M.S. Committee had been so
struck by the tone and intelligence of Samuel Crowther's journal
of the Niger Expedition that they sent for him in the following
year, 1842, to come to England, placed him in Islington College,
and in a few months found him qualified for presentation to the
Bishop of London as a candidate for ordination. On Trinity .
Sunday, June 11th, 1843, twenty-one years (less one week) after
the poor frightened slave-boy was landed by H. M.S. Myrmidon at
Sierra Leone, he was duly admitted to the ministry of the l^^^^^j"'-
Church ;* and on October 1st in the same year he received priest's cr^ther.
orders. Of course he was at once in demand as a preacher ; and
it was a touchingly significant scene when he stood up in the
pulpit of Northrepps Church in the presence of the veteran
benefactor of his race, Thomas Fowell Buxton. It was at the
very next Anniversary that Bishop Blomfield preached the Bishop
Annual Sermon, f and in the course of it he said, — on°the^
" What cause for thanksgiving to Him who hath made of one blood all mmiTster.
nations of men, is to be found in the thought that He has not only
blessed the labours of this Society by bringing many of those neglected
and persecuted people to the knowledge of a Saviour, but, from among
a race despised as incapable of intellectual exertion and acquirement,
He has raised up men well qualified, even in point of knowledge, to
communicate to others the saving truths which they have themselves
embraced, and to become preachers of the Gospel to their brethren
according to the flesh ! "
Saturday, December 2nd, 1843, was a great day at Sierra c^^her
Leone. On that day, the " black man who had been crowned a Leone"^
minister," as the phrase was, disembarked from the ship that had
brought him from England, amid the welcomes of hundreds of
those who, like himself, had once been slaves but now were free
— many of them free with the liberty of the children of God.
The next day, "the Eev. Samuel Crowther" preached to an
immense congregation from ihe words, " And yet there is room,"
* An interesting incident happened at the ordination. "WTien the candidates
for deacon's orders were to go up to the Bishop, an awkward pause occurred.
The Englishmen, by a sudden and simultaneous instinct, waited for the Negro
to go first ; while he was sitting with his eyes on the ground, unconscious of
the precedence they wished to accord him. At last, suddenly seeing that all
eyes were fixed on him, he quietly arose, went forward, and knelt before the
Bishop.
t See pp. 396, 418.
458
New Enterprises in A/-rica
Townsend
visits
Abeokuta.
Part V. and afterwards administered the Lord's Supper to a large number
pf'^^'tn of Negro communicants. This service was, of course, in
'»P^'9- 'English, iYiQ lingua franca oi the Colony ; but " Adjai " had not
forgotten the native Yoruba of his childhood, and in a few days
he conducted another service in that language, for the benefit of
the large section of the population whose vernacular it was.
This, it may be presumed, was the first Christian service ever
held in Africa in the Yoruba tongue ; and it is not surprising
that at the end, after the benediction, the whole congregation
burst forth with the cry of K& oh shell, " So let it be ! "
But Crowther was not to be long in SieiTa Leone. Before
this, while he was in England, Henry Townsend, the young
schoolmaster from Exeter who was already giving promise of
great efficiency as a missionary, had made an expedition in the
little trading-vessel Wilhcrforcc to Badagry, and had actually
gone up to Abeokuta. He had been warmly received by the
principal chief, and invited to return and live there. He returned
at once to England and reported this remarkable opening for an
entirely new Mission a thousand miles beyond Sierra Leone, in
the very country which had been so ravaged by the slave-trade.
An active Methodist missionary, Mr. Freeman, had anticipated
Townsend, both in visiting Abeokuta, and in reporting on it in
England; and both the C.M.S. and the Wesleyan Society were
already keen to enter so inviting an opeii door. Townsend re-
ceived holy orders from Bishop Blomfield on Trinity Sunday,
1844, just a year after Crowther ; and then he returned to Africa,
commissioned, together with Crowther and with a young German
missionary, the Eev. C. A. Gollmer, to commence a Mission in
the Yoruba country.
Towards the end of 1844 — a year memorable also for the first
commencement of work on the East African coast, as we shall see
presently — the party sailed for Badagry. There, however, they
were detained a year and a half, owing to the death of the friendly
head-chief of Abeokuta, and the road thither being closed by local
wars. At length the way opened to go forward, and on August 3rd,
1846, Townsend and Crowther (Gollmer being left at the coast)
entered the great Egba town, amid joyous welcomes from chiefs
and people.
The Yoruba Mission quickly took a foremost place in the
interest and sympathies of the Society's circle of friends ; and for
some years no Mission was watched more eagerly or prayed for
more fervently. We leave it now for the present, proposing to
return to it in a future chapter, when we shall see something of
the blessing which God graciously vouchsafed to it.
The new
Yoruba
Mission.
Meanwhile, we will cross over to the other side of the Dark
Krapf in Continent, where we left the intrepid Johann Ludwig Krapf facing-
perils and privations innumerable in what proved to be vain
attempts to establish a Mission in the kingdom of Shoa, and
Niger Expedition^ Yoruba Mission^ East Coast 459
among the Galki tribes, south of Abyssinia/'^ He had now (1842) Part V.
a young wife to share his wanderings ; a lady from Basle, whom }!^'^^~^^'
he had married at Cairo. Eosina Krapf was a brave and devoted '''^^'
woman ; and needful it was that she should be. In the dry bed
of a torrent, between rocky hills, with no tent, or nurse, or
surgeon, her child was born. " In the Shoho wilderness," wrote
Krapf, "my beloved wife was prematurely delivered of a little Birth and
daughter, whom I christened ' Eneba,' a tear. I had to bury the the desert,
dear child, for she lived only a few hours, under a tree by the
wayside, and her mourning mother was obliged to prosecute her
journey on the third day, as the Shohos would not wait any
longer, and there was no village where she could have found rest."
Krapf had asked leave for the Society to go southwards, and
try and reach the Galla tribes another way ; and at Aden, whither
— being finally driven out of Shoa — he now^ proceeded, he found
letters sanctioning his proposal. He and his wife accordingly, on Krapf goes
November 11th, 1843, set sail in an Arab trading-vessel bound for south.
Zanzibar. The miserable craft, leaky and ill-found, tossed about
for four days, and then began steadily to sink. There seemed no
hope of escape, and the husband and wife together commended
themselves to the Lord, and awaited death calmly ; when
suddenly a boat unexpectedly appeared, and took them off, only
a few minutes before the vessel turned over and went down.
They were put on shore again at Aden, and in a few days started
again in another trading-vessel going to various ports on the East
Coast of Africa. It is worth noting that this voyage, so pregnant
with great issues, was being taken at the very time that the newly-
ordained African clergyman, Samuel Crowther, was sailing from
England for Sierra Leone.
The x\rab vessel took two months to complete its voyage to ^'"^pfon
Zanzibar. At several ports Krapf inquired about the interior, of African
which nothing whatever was then known to geographers. He Coast,
was told of " Chagga " and " Uniamesi " (as he spelt it) — names
familiar to us now, — and that in the latter country there was " a,
great lake." This is the first mention of that inland sea which
Speke discovered fourteen years afterwards and named the Vic-
toria Nyanza. On January 3rd, 1844, Krapf entered the harbour
of Mombasa. Here we catch a ghmpse of the Divine Hand
ordering by its invisible governance the course of this world.
Had the first vessel from Aden not foundered, it would have taken
Krapf straight to Zanzibar, and he might never have visited
Mombasa at all — which would have altered the whole history of
African geographical and missionary enterprise.
Only for a few hours, however, was Krapf at Mombasa on that
3rd of January ; though this was enough to suggest the place to
his mind as a base for future travels and labours. It was to
Zanzibar that he was now going.
The island and town so named held even then an important
* See p. 353.
460 New Enterprises in Africa :
Part V. place in the geography of the world as the capital of the great
Ph^^tq ^^'^^ potentate, Sultan Said Said. As Imam of Muscat in Arabia,
^P" ■ Said Said had extended his dominion all down the East African
Zanzibar coast, and then had transferred the seat of his empire to Zanzibar.
SuUa^n. ^^^ Arabs are great traders, and the place became a centre of
widely-extended commerce. Some hundreds of Banians, the
trading caste of Gujerat in Western India, had settled there, and
brisk was the traffic across the Arabian Sea, wafted by the steady
trade-winds. "In the autumn, the sailors have but to spread
their broad lateen sails to the north-east monsoon, to l)e driven,
faster than any but the fastest steamers can follow, [from the
Indian] to the African coast. There they have only to wait till
the summer season brings the south-west monsoon, to be wafted
back with equal ease and swiftness to the shores of India." ■'•
These Banian traders being British subjects, an English Consul
had been stationed at Zanzibar. Not, indeed, for their protection
only. England had already done something towards at least the
diminution of the East African Slave Trade. A treaty limiting its
area and scope had been concluded witli Said Said as far back as
1822, and though the result was but small, this gave the Consul
something to do.
Krapf received a cordial welcome from Captain Hamerton, who
was then Consul, and from the Sultan himself. The former asked
him " to remain in Zanzibar, preaching on Sunda5'^s to its few
Krapf at Europeans, w^orking amongst the Banians from India, founding
schools for the Arabs and Swahilis (coast people), and preparing
books." But Krapf 's heart was with the Gallas, and he declined
the work which, many years after, was so efficiently taken up by
, the Universities' Mission. The Sultan, therefore, gave him a
letter, which ran as follows : —
" This comes from Said Said, Sultan ; greeting all our subjects, friends,
and governors. This letter is written on behalf of Doctor Krapf, a
German, a good man who wishes to convert the world to God. Behave
well to him, and be everywhere serviceable to him."
The Mohammedan potentate, it will be observed, was quite
willing that a Christian missionary should go to Heathen savages.
It did not occur to him that the Christian message was for him
too.
In the first week of May, 1844, just when, in Exeter Hall, the
C.M.S. Committee were reporting that they had given Dr. Krapf t
leave to visit the East African coast, he and his wife settled at
Krapf at Mombasa. This place also, like Zanzibar, is both an island and a
town ; but not, like Zanzibar, an island fifty miles long. It is a
small islet in the estuary of a small river. It was one of the
Portuguese settlements in the seventeenth century, and the old
* Li/e 0/ Hir Bartle Frere, vol. i. p. 500.
•j- The degree of Ph.D. was conferred on him in this year, 1844, by the
University of Tubingen.
Mombasa.
Niger Expedition^ Yoruba Mission^ East Coast 461
fort around which the town clusters bears the date of its erection Part V.
by Xeixas de Cabreira, 1635. Mombasa is the Portuguese form 1841-48.
of the name, but Krapf wrote it in the Arab form, Mombaz, and ^'^^P- 29-
the former has only been revived in the past twenty years. The
inhabitants were chiefly Swahili, a mixed race resulting from the
mingling of the Arabs with the Natives ; but on the mainland was
the barbarous Wanika tribe."''
With characteristic energy, Krapf at once flung himself into the
study of l)oth languages, and within a month, on June 8th, he
actually began an attempt to translate the Book of Genesis into
Swahili, assisted by the Mohammedan Cadi (judge) of Mombasa.
Scarcely, however, had he begun, when the great trial fell upon
him which was to be the first of a long series of illustrations of
that key-text of African missionary history, "Except a corn of
wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone ; but if it die,
it bringeth forth much fruit." On July 13th, death took his wife
from his side.
Eosina Krapf had already, as we have seen, laid one child in
an African grave. On July 6th a second infant daughter was Birth and
given to her. Nothing more touching has ever been written than "^^^^^
Krapf 's diary of the next seven days.f When it became clear
that she had not strength to throw off the fever, Mrs. Krapf called
the Mohammedans who had been attending on them around her
and told them, "with decision and force, that no Saviour but Rosina
Jesus Christ could support them in the hour of death." Then she ^yfrfg ^
turned to her husband : — message.
" She told me that I shouki never forbear speaking to the people
about Christ, and His being the only and true Mediator between God
and man. Though my words might be forgotten, yet tliey might at the
hour of death recur to the mind, and then be a blessing to the hearer :
Christ being able to pardon a tremblino-, contrite, and believing
Mohammedan as well and as easily as He had pardoned herself.
Furthermore, she said I should not spend my time in mourning for her,
but strive in good earnest to fulfil my duty and work while it is day."
Then Krapf himself was attacked by the fever, and when his
wife breathed her last it was only by a great effort that he was
able to rise and satisfy himself that she w^as really dead. At her
own express wish she was buried, not on the island of Mombasa,
but on the mainland opposite ; and, a day or two after, the
motherless babe was laid beside her. " My heart and body,"
wrote Krapf in a private letter, "wept for many days." Yet he
could see in that grave the pledge of future triumphs of the
Gospel in Africa ; and he wrote home to the Committee his
memorable and oft-quoted message : — Krapfs
. message to
" Tell our friends at home that there is now on the East African Europe.
coast a lonely missionary grave. Tliis is a sign that you have
* Swahili is from sahel, Arabic for "coast." Krapf wrote Sooahelee aud
Wonica.
■f Printed in the O.M. Record of April, 1845, and in The Finished Course.
of it
462 New Enterprises in Africa : Niger Expedition^ (5^=c.
Part V. commenced the struggle with this jjar^ of the ivorld ; and as the
1841-48. victories of the Church are gained by stepping over the graves of
Chap. 29. j^Qy memhers, you may he the more convinced that the hour is at
hand when you are summoned to the conversion of Africa from its
eastern shore."
He little thought, indeed, that on the very plot of land in which
he laid the remains of his beloved Eosina would, thirty years
after, rise a famous missionary settlement and a Church of the
What came Living God. But he did begin to ponder on the future, and to
form large plans for extended missionary operations. Three ideas
shaped themselves in his mind : (1) a chain of stations to stretch
right across the continent ; (2) a colony for freed slaves similar to
Sierra Leone, for which colony, he wrote, " Mombaz and its
environs would be the best site " ; (3) in his own words, " A
black bishop and black clergy may become a necessity in the
civilization of Africa." There was small prospect of either then ;
yet Krapf lived to see the Central African Missions of our own
day, and Frere Town, and the Bishopric of the Niger.
But this was not yet. For two years the solitary missionary
toiled at the Swahili language, compiling a grammar and dictionary,
and translating the whole New Testament ; occasionally visiting
the Wanika on the mainland ; and prosecuting geographical and
ethnographical inquiries in all directions. At last, in June, 1846,
Krapf and he was joined by a fellow-labourer. John Rebmann, like him, was
e mann. ^^ Wurtemburger and a Basle student ; but, unlike him, had taken
the divinity coiu'se at Islington and received English oi'ders at the
hands of Bishop Blomfield. Then, like St. Paul when Silas and
Timotheus joined him at Corinth, Krapf was "pressed in the
spirit"; and very soon were begun those wonderful explorations
which, in their issue, opened up all Equatorial Africa, and led to
the vast development of European influence and Christian enter-
prise which are among the glories of our day.
CHAPTER XXX.
The Opening of China.
Nestorian and Roman Missions in China— China in the First Report
of C. M.S. —Morrison, Milne, Gutzlaff— E. B. Squire's Attempt—
The Chinese War— Lord Ashley and the Opium Trade— New-
Moves Forward— Vincent Stanton— The C.M.S. Mission— The
First Missionaries— Bishop George Smith.
" When He saiv the multitudes, He was moved with compassion on them." —
St. Matt. ix. 36.
"J have set before thee an open door ^ —'^ex . m. 8.
ROCK, Rock, when wilt thou open ? " said the Jesuit, Part V.
VaUgnani, as his wistful eyes looked towards the Jj^^^"^o
long-closed Celestial Empire on his way to Japan. ^^^'^
" 0 mighty fortress, when shall these impenetrable China's
gates of thine be broken through?" His pre- ga°es^
decessor, Francis Xavier, had already died in his rude hut on
another httle barren island, gazing across the narrow strait at
the long-closed mainland of China. But Xavier did not die
despairing. With his last breath he repeated the familiar closing
words of the Tc Deum, " In te, Domine, speravi, non confundar
in teternum "; and the trustful hope of the Church of God, as she
has knocked at the gate of China, has not been " confounded for
ever.
Not that Christianity had then never entered China. The
famous inscription at 'Si-ngan-fu is to this day a witness that
in the seventh century a.d. the Nestorian Missions had spread Nestorian
"the illustrious rehgion " in every direction; and in the thir-
teenth century the great Tartar potentate, Kublai Khan, sent
from Peking to the Pope for teachers. =■= John de Monte Corvine,
the Franciscan, wielded great influence at the Court of Peking,
translated the New Testament and the Psalms into Chinese, and
baptized six thousand souls. But for the next two centuries
the history is an absolute blank. After Xavier' s death, however,
the Roman missionaries, backed by the power of Portugal, and ^"i^^"^^
winninfT their way by their scientific attainments as well as by
their undaunted courage, estabhshed themselves within the
" mightv fortress." The success achieved by Matthew Ricci
* See Chapter II.
464
The Opening of China
Part V.
1841^8.
Chap. 30.
Chris-
tianity
prohibited.
China in
the first
C.M.S.
Report.
Moseley's
pamphlet.
and other zealous and learned priests was considerable, largely
through their virtual sanction of ancestral worship in the form
of masses for the dead, and the close resemblance of the
externals of their worship to the idolatry of Buddhism and
Taoism. Their frequent interference with politics, however, as in
other parts of the world, repeatedly aroused the fears of the
Chinese Government, and led to terrible persecutions. In the
eighteenth century Christianity became a prohibited religion,
though the many thousands of Chinese hereditary Christians
scattered in small bands over the vast empire were too little
distinguishable from the Heathen to be seriously molested. The
Eomanist headquarters were at Macao, the island off the Canton
Eiver belonging to Portugal.
The very first Eeport of the Church Missionary Society, dated
May, 1801,''' devotes two of its twelve short pages to China. The
words are worth recording here : —
'' The extensive Empire of China, which is stated to contain three
hundred milKons of inhabitants, has hitherto enjoyed no share of the
Missionary labours of the protestaut churches. A zealous dissenting
minister, the Rev. Mr. Moseley, has, however, of himself conceived the
design of printing part of the Scriptures in the Chinese language, and
circulating the work in that populous country. Extracts from the
valuable Memoir, he has printed upon this subject, are subjoined to this
Report. To carry his design into execution is, however, a work more
adequate to the united eflbrts of a society than to the exertions of an
individual. He has therefore expressed his wish, that this Society
should undertake the important work he had proposed, and has promised
to give into its hands a considerable pecuniary aid which had been
promised to him. The Committee are fully impressed with a sense of
the importance of the proposed, work, but they are aware of its
difficulties. The want of a sufficient fund, the natural difficulty of the
Chinese language, the little acquaintance with it which Europeans
possess, form obstacles not easily to be sm^mounted. The Committee,
however, have determined to open a separate fund for this purpose ; and
should that fund be adequate to the necessary expense ; and should
they also obtain sufficient evidence of the fidelity and elegance of the
MS. Chinese version of part of the New Testament, now in the British
Museum ; or should the Committee find the means of obtaining a
N'ew°Tes^ faithful and elegant translation, they will direct their attention to this
ta^nt^^" important subject. At the same time, they earnestly beg it to be
understood that a work of this magnitude and importance cannot hastily
be executed ; and they deprecate the idea of holding out sanguine or
arrogant expectations of speedy success in it."
Turning to the Appendix, we find nine more pages devoted to
extracts from Mr. Moseley's pamphlet. He gives a brief sketch of
the Koman Missions, their early successes and suljsequent troubles ;
and then describes the Chinese MS., which he had discovered in
the British Museum, and which had been brought to England by
Sir Hans Sloane in 1738. It contains, he says, St. Luke's Gospel,
the Acts, and St. Paul's Epistles ; and he earnestly appeals for aid
* See p. 74.
Chinese
version of
The Opening of China 465
Hi printing it for circulation. How this work came into the hands Part V.
of the S.P.C.K., and from theirs into those of the newly-formed l''^-il-if^-
Bihle Society, has already been related. •■- The thoughts of the Cliap^iO.
Church Missionary Society meanwhile turned to Africa ; and
China was for the time forgotten.
But it was the interest excited by Moselev's pamphlet and the l.m s.
. . . sends
Chinese MS. that led the London Missionary Society to send Morrison
Kobert Morrison to China in 1807. The Northumbrian lad was *° '^^'"^•
self-educated like Carey ; but, like Carey, he became celebrated in
after years for his Oriental learning. His own first thought was
of Africa : could he not go to Timbuctoo, then recently revealed
by the travels of Mungo Park ? But God wanted him for special
service in China, just as, thirty-four years after, God wanted
Livingstone, who had thought of China, for special service in
Africa. It was, however, — as we have seen regarding other
Missions, — one thing to be appointed to China, and quite another
thing to get there. The English trade was in the hands of the
East India Company, and no passage for a missionary could be
obtained in their ships. So Morrison crossed the Atlantic to New How he
York, and thence sailed in an American vessel round Cape Horn ^°* ^ ^^^'
and across the Pacific, with letters to the American Consul at
Canton. There he landed on September 7th, 1807, eight months
after leaving England — a quick voyage considering the route and
the period.
Again, it was one thing to reach China, and another thing to
live and work there as a missionary. "First of all, Chinamen
were forbidden by the Government to teach the language to any
foreigner, under pain of death. Secondly, no one could remain in
China except for purposes of trade. Thirdly, the Roman Catholic
missionaries would be [and were] bitterly hostile."! How How he
Morrison lived in an American house, unable to walk the streets, w'ork?
and unable to leave his Chinese books aboiit ; how he presently
donned Chinese dress, grew long finger-nails, and cultivated a
queue ; how he afterwards abandoned this plan, as useless in the
circumstances; how he hired a single room to live in, and was
cheated and ill-treated by the Chinese landlord ; how lie tried in
vain to tame and teach three wild Chinese lads ; how he laboured
and laboured at the language ; how after two years he was engaged
by the East India Company as their translator, and thus o])tained
a secure position ; how, after infinite toil, he produced a Chinese
grammar and dictionary, the latter of which cost the Company
£12,000 to print and publish in six quarto volumes with 4600
pages ; how he also, wath the aid of Robert Milne, who went out His
in 1813,]: produced the whole Bible in Chinese in 1818; how in Bibie"^
* See p. 74.
t C. S. Home, Sfori/ of tlxe L.M.S., p. 124.
X It was Milne who said that "to acquire Cliinese is a work for men with
bodies of brass, lungs of steel, heads of oak, hands of > ]irini;-steo], e_yes of
eagles, hearts of apostles, memories of angols, aud lives of Methuselah! "
VOL. I. H h
466
The Opening of China
Part V.
18-41-48.
Chap. 30,
His death,
New edict
against
Chris-
tianity.
American
Missions.
Gutzlaff.
1814 he baptized one Chinese convert, and nine others in the next
twenty years ; how he and Milne founded an Anglo-Chinese
College at Malacca, being British territory ; how Milne started a
magazine there called (of all names !) the Gleaner ; how Milne
died, and Mrs. Milne, and Mrs. Morrison, leaving Morrison in
1822 once more the sole Protestant missionary in China ; how he
visited England in 1824-5 ; how he went back to more troublous
surroundings, hostile Enghsh officials and Eomish conspiracies
against him ; and how on July 31st, 1834— the very day on which,
far away on the other side of the globe, the West Indian slaves
were joyfully awaiting the midnight that would usher in their new
freedom ■■■ — he entered into rest, at the age of fifty-three : — all this,
and much more, has often been told, and was told, year by year,
by Josiah Pratt, in the pages of the Missionary Register.
In the very first volume of the Begister, for 1813, occur two
notices regarding China. Morrison's labours are briefly referred
to in an account of the London Missionary Society ; and in
the December number is given a new Imperial Edict issued
from Peking against Christianity. " Such Europeans," it says,
" as shall privately print books and establish preachers in order to
pervert the multitude ... the chief ofte shall be executed " — and
others should be imprisoned or exiled.
America was not content with having helped Morrison to get
to_ China. In 1829 began the noble succession of American
missionaries who have done so much for the evangelization of the
Celestial Empire. In that year the A. B.C. P.M., the Society
constituted with a broad basis like the L.M.S. in England (though
virtually Congregationalist), sent out Elijah Bridgman and David
Abeel,t and, three years later, S. Wells Williams, afterwards well
known for one of the best books on China, The Middle Kingdom.
They, however, were as closely confined to the foreign trading
factories at Canton as Morrison and Milne had been. But at this
time, also, occurred the travels of a very remarkable man, Charles
Gutzlaff.
Gutzlaff was a Prussian agent of the Netherlands Missionary
Society, an accomplished scholar, a qualified doctor, and a man
of extraordinary enterprise and resource. His proper mission-
field was Siam ; but in 1831-5 he made seven journeys up and
down the coast of China, sometimes accompanying foreign trading-
vessels as surgeon and interpreter, and sometimes in Chinese
junks ; ascending the rivers, landing here and there at the risk of
his life, pursued by pirates, harassed by the police, stoned by the
mob, haled before the magistrates, but giving medicine to crowds
of sick folk, and distributing literally hundreds of thousands of
tracts and portions of Scripture. His'method was much criticized,
* See p. 345.
t It was Mr. Abeel whose appeals in En glaiKl in 1831 for the Chinese women
led to the formation of the Society for Promoting' Female Education in the
East.
The Opening oe China 467
but his adventures excited unbounded interest in England and Part V.
America, and certainly gave the Christian public a new idea as to l^-il-^^-
the possibilities of missionary work in China. "Are the bowels '-^''^P- ^^-
of mercy of a compassionate Saviour," he wrote at the close of was china
his third journey, "shut against these millions? Before JJm, "*"y^*^"^'
China is not sJiut ! He, the Almighty Conqueror of Death and
Hell, will open the gates of heaven for these myriads. He has
opened them. When we arrived at Fuh-chow, on our return, ray
large store of books was exhausted, and I had to send applicants
away empty-handed." '■'• " Two friends," stirred by his narx-atives,
issued in 1834 a rousing " Appeal to the British and American
Churches," pointing out that " the Buddhists of the first century
found the door of China open for their Idolatry ; and the Nes-
torians of the seventh century, for their Heresy ; and the
Mahomedans of the eighth century, for their Koran ; and the
Papists of the thirteenth century, for their Mass " — why not, then,
the purer and fuller message of the Gospel? " Whenever," they
go on, " Invoiiam viam ant facia7u has been the maxim of any
sect or system, they have scaled the imperial wall, and penetrated
far enough into the Celestial Empire, to prove that neither was
impassable."
The natural result of these efforts followed. The Chinese
Government woke up, and issued a new edict. " Some English Another
ships," it said, "have passed along the coasts of China, and have edfct.^
distributed some European books ; and as these books exhort to
believe and to venerate the Chief of that religion, named Jesus, it
appears that this religion is the same as the Christian Eeligion,
whicli has been prosecuted at different times and banished with
all rigour." " The Christian religion," it goes on, " is the ruin of
morals and of the human heart; therefore it is prohibited."!
After Morrison's death, the L.M.S. work was carried on with
difldculty by his son and W. H. Medhurst ; and though the
Americans were not molested, it was little that they could do.
Nevertheless, three other American societies sought to enter the
field, the Baptists, the Presbyterians, and the Protestant Episcopal American
Church. The Episcopal Church sent two men in 1835 to Singa- iviTssion^
pore and Batavia, for preparator}- study and work, and they were
followed in 1837 by W. J. Boone, M.D., afterwards the first
Protestant Bishop in China.
Although in the first two years of the existence of the Church
Missionary Society, when no Protestant mibbionaries had yet
attempted to enter China, the possibility of sending men there was
several times discussed by the Committee, the other enterprises
to which the Providence of God called them entirely diverted
their attention for many years. In 1824, when Morrison was in
England, he was received by them, and asked them to send a
* Missionary Register, 1835, p. 85. f Ibid., 1837, p.
H h -2
90.
468 The Opening oe China
Part V. Mission ; but tlie way did not open, and in 1832 we find a resolu-
1841 -48. tion, in reply to a suggestion from friends to the same eifect, that
Chap^30. ^^g financial position precluded the Society from undertaking such
C.M.S., an enterprise. In 1834, however, the Committee were again
Guuiai"' discussing the openings indicated by Gutzlaff's journeys. They
wrote out to him for information, and actually made a grant of
£300 to him in furtherance of his work. His reply =■= plainly told
of the difficulties and dangers which Europeans in China would
encounter. He mentions his own trials, but adds, " Nevertheless
I am still alive, and can in much weakness carry on the work of
God." "Neither the Apostles nor the Eeformers," he writes,
" waited luitil Governments were favourable to the Gospel, but
went on boldly in the strength of the Lord." What sort of
missionaries should go? " We want here," he says, " 7io gentle-
men missionaries." Considering that when gentlemen by birth
and education have gone to the mission-field, they have for the
most part set a brilliant example to others of readiness to endure
hardship — just as they do in the army and navy, — this remark is
at first sight startling ; but evidently his reference is rather to
those who, whatever their origin socially, desire to live as
" gentlemen " and not risk their precious lives. For he goes on —
" but men who are at all times ready to lay down their lives for
the Saviour, and can wander about forgotten and despised, without
any human assistance, but only the help of God." t
c.M-S^ B '^^^^ an one the Committee hoped they had found in Edward B.
Iquire. ' ' Squire, an officer in the Indian Navy, who offered to the Society
at this time ; and on June 28th, 1836, they bid him farewell with
an admirable paper of Instructions drawn up by William Jowett.]:
He was to make Singapore his headquarters, and thence make
such journeys to Chinese ports as he might find possible. " View-
ing the enterprise in all its difficulties," said the Committee in the
Eeport that had just before been presented, " they are constrained
to exclaim, With man this is impossible ! Their only ground, yet
a sure ground, of encouragement is that with God all things are
possible ! " Neither the hour nor the man, however, had come
yet. Mr. Squire, excellent as he was, did not get beyond Macao.
Opium and Q^-^g clifiiculty was that the Opium Traffic was now in full swing.
^''^' The abolition in 1833 of the East India Company's monopoly of
trade in the East had been followed by an immense increase of
the export of Indian opium to China. Every ship to a Chinese
* Printed in the Missionary Register, 1837, p. 326.
I In after years there seemed good reason for not entirely trusting Gutzlaff's
accounts of his work in China. H. Venn's Private Journals are much
occupied with this question in the early 'fifties. King Frederick William
cf Prussia believed in Gutzlaff, and on Bunsen informing him of the doubts
of experienced men in England, he (the King) "wrote a letter of sixteen
pages, urging Bunsen to arouse the Bishops and clergy of the Church of
England to more vigorous action for the evangelization of China " Private
Journal, October 11th, 1850.
+ Printed in the Appendix to the Report of 1837.
The Opening of China 469
port ca^rriecl the drug ; everj^ ship, therefore, was regarded by the Part V.
Chinese authorities as bringing into the country something worse p,^."*^~t^'
even than Christianity ; a missionary coming in an opium-vessel ''^''" '
was an enemy to the Empire ; and practically all aggressive work
was suspended. Then came the first War with China ; and
missionary work of any kind being for the time hopeless, Mr.
Squire returned to England." " The many millions of China,"
said the Eeport of 1841, " are not forgotten by your Committee ;
nor are they inattentive to the great political events which are
taking place in that country ; but should God in His providence
again open the door for missionary operations, your Committee
feel that greatly enlarged resources must be provided, to justify
them in recommencing a Mission which for its successful prosecu-
tion would demand a scale of operations in some measure com-
mensurate with the magnitude of the undertaking."
It was the War that opened China to the Gospel. We have The War
seen how in New Zealand the missionary led the way, and the chlnl's
English colonist and soldier followed. In China the soldier led gates,
the way and the missionary followed. It was on this wise. The
Chinese Government, seriously alarmed at the quantities of opium
now poui'ing into the country, took stringent measures to stop it.
Commissioner Lin, at Canton, insisted on whole cargoes being
forfeited ; and more than the value of one million pounds sterling
was actually destroyed. Angry disputes followed ; and presently
the question became one, not of opium merely, but whether the
]"]nglish would be allowed to trade with China at all. Ultiniately,
in 1810, open war ensued — a war which, on England's side, it is
hard to justify on any righteous principle of national conduct, and
yet a war which undoubtedly resulted in great benefit to China.
Of course the British troops were everywhere easily victorious.
They captured the island of Chusan ; they captured Ningpo ; they
captured x\moy ; they threatened Peking itself ; and at length
the Chinese sued for peace on any terms that England would
grant. The principal conditions were — the cession to England of
the island of Hong Kong; the throwing open of five "treaty
ports" to foreign trade and residence, viz.. Canton, Amoy, Fuh- First open
chow, Ningpo, and Shanghai ; and a heavy money indemnity. p°''*^-
The Treaty of Nanking, which imposed these terms, and in the
framing of which Morrison's son took an active part, was
concluded in 1842.
An extract from Lord Ashley's journal at this point will show Lord
what the feelings of many thoughtful Christian men were at the uie'^War."
time : f —
"Nov. 22nd, 1842. Intelligence of great successes in China, and con-
sequent peace. I rejoice in peace ; I rejoice that this cruel and debasing
* He was afterwards ordained, and was Vicar of S\vansoa for thirty years.
I Life of the Earl of Shaftesbunj, vol. i. p. HO.
470
The Opening of China
Lord
Ashley on
Opium.
Part V. war is terminated ; but I cannot rejoice — it may be nnpatriotic, it may be
1841-48. un-British — in our successes. We have triumphed in one of the most
Chap. 30. lawless, unnecessary, and unfair struggles in the records of History ; it
— — was a war on which good men could not invoke the favour of Heaven,
and Christians have shed more Heathen blood in two years than the
Heathen have shed of Christian blood in two centuries.
" Nov. 25th. The whole world is intoxicated with the prospect of
Chinese trade. Altars to Mammon are rising on every side, and
thousands of cotton children will be sacrificed to his honour.*. . . The
peace, too, is as wicked as the war. We refuse, even now, to give the
Emperor of China relief in the matter of the opium-trade."
These last words prepare us for Lord Shaftesbury's hfe-long
protest against the Opium Traffic. Early in the following year,
1843, Mr. Samuel Gurney and Mr. Fry approached him with a
view to his taking up the question in Parliament. The War had
not compelled the Chinese Government to legalize the traffic. To
do that, indeed, they positively refused. But they saw that open
resistance was impossible ; and the sin of forcing the drug upon an
unwilling nation — a nation conscious of its lack of moral strength
to resist the temptation to opium-smoking, yet conscious also of
the disastrous consequences of yielding to it — has lain heavy on
the minds of Christian men ever since. What could be done ?
Without entering into the details of the question, which are very
complicated, it may suffice to quote the resolution moved by Lord
Ashley in the House of Commons on April 4th, 1843 : —
" That it is the opinion of this House that the continuance of the trade
in opium, and the monopoly of its growth in the territories of British
India, are destructive of all relations of amity between England and
China, injurious to the manufacturing interests of the country by the
very serious diminution of legitimate commerce, and utterly inconsistent
with the honour and duties of a Christian kingdom ; and that steps be
taken as soon as possible, with due regard to the rights of governments
and individuals, to abolish the evil."
His speech in moving this resolution occupied seven columns of
The Times next day ; and that paper, in a leading article, pro-
nounced it " grave, temperate, and practical," and " far more
statesmanlike in its ultimate and general views than those by which
it was opposed." Moreover, The Times held up to scorn the chief
argument on the other side, as in essence this — that morality and
religion and the happiness of mankind were very fine things in
their way ; but that we could not afford to buy them at so dear a
price as £1,200,000 a year of the Indian revenue. It is clear that
on some grave questions our public instructors have not grown
wiser in half a century. At the earnest request, however, of the
Premier, Sir Eobert Peel, Lord Ashley did not divide the House,
being assured that the resolution would hamper the Government
in their negotiations with China on the subject, and understanding
by private communications from the Board of Trade that Govern-
* Eeferring to the child-labour in the Lancashire cotton-mills, not yet
regulated by his Factory Acts.
"The
Times "
on Opium.
The Opening of China 47 1
menb were in earnest, and glad to be pushed on by the moral Part A\
influence of the debate.''' But whatever good intentions Ministers 1841-l-s.
may have indulged in at the time, nothing came of them. The P" ^^'
Opium Traffic grew, and grew, until its profit to the Indian revenue Growth of
was not one million but eight millions ; and the debasement of the ^rade'*"'"
Chinese people so increased that, to meet the demand for opium,
the poppy supplanted cereals in extensive tracts of country that
never before displayed what Archdeacon Moule calls "its baneful
bloom."!
The Missionary Societies now prepared to move forward. The Missions
L.M.S. removed its Anglo-Chinese College, of which Dr. Legge \ fb?Xlrd.
had become Principal, from Malacca to Hong Kong ; while Med-
hurst and Dr. Lockhart — the first medical missionary in China —
established themselves at Shanghai. Other Missions were started
at Hong Kong, and also at Amoy and Ningpo. The Female Edu-
cation Society sent a lady to Shanghai ; and another lady, who did
a great work, Miss Aldersey, settled at Ningpo. At Hong Kong,
twelve missionaries ixiet and made arrangements for a revised
version of the Bible, delegates being appointed for the work. In
1844 there were thirty Protestant missionaries, at various ports.
In 1846 Dr. Boone, of the American Episcopal Church, was
consecrated Bishop, and settled at Shanghai. A clergyman whose
name should ever be affectionately remembered by the Church
Missionary Society, the Eev. Vincent J. Stanton, went out in 1843 Vincent
as Consular Chaplain at Hong Kong ; and it was he who founded
St. Paul's College there. He had gone to China during the war as
a voluntary and unattached missionary, and had been seized and
confined in chains for four months. On his release he returned to
England ; and when Hong Kong became a British possession he
was appointed chaplain. §
What was the Church Missionary Society doing ? The opening Could
of China was coincident with the serious financial crisis which has go in?'
been before alluded to, and which will be more fully noticed in a
future chapter ; and when the Treaty of Nanking was concluded,
all the Committee could do was to put on record their deep sense
of the importance of the opportunity, and express their readiness
to join in taking advantage of it whenever men and means should
be forthcoming. A statement to this effect was issued, to meet the
appeals that at once came from all parts of England, pressing the
Society to undertake a China Mission. The news of the Treaty
reached England in November, 1842. In December the Committee
* Li^e of Lord Shaftesbury, vol. i. pp. 466, 475.
f Story nf the Cheh-Kiang Missiov, p. 5.
X Afterwards Professor of Chinese at Oxford.
§ Mr. Stanton was in after years Rector of Halesworth, and a munificent
siipporter of the C.M.S. Mrs. Stanton, who was with him in China, was a
cousin of the Gurneys, Fiys, Barclays, &c. Their son is now Professor of
Divinity at Cambridge. The chains worn at Canton by Mr. Stanton are to be
seen at many of tlie Missionary Exhibitions.
47- The Oi'ENiNG OF China
Part Y. passed their resolution on the subject. In January thek statement
1841-48. ^yas issued. In March came the first token that the Lord would
^^P' ■ answer the prayers going up from the whole C.M.S. circle. A
The money friend feeling himself to be "less than the least," and therefore
men!^^ Calling himself ' ^Xa^ia tot (.fio<i instead of giving his name, sold out
£6000 Consols and handed the proceeds to the Society as the
nucleus of a China Fund. Before long, tw^o clergymen came for-
ward to undertake the Mission : the Rev. George Smith, of
Magdalen Hall, Oxford, who had been a zealous and successful
Association Secretary of the Society, and had also had a parish in
Yorkshire ; and the Rev. Thomas McClatchie, of Trinity College,
Dublin, who was curate of Midsomer Norton. They were cordially
accepted, received their Instructions at a Valedictory Meeting on
May 29th, 1844, and sailed on June. 4th for China.
George Smith and McClatchie were instructed to visit all the five Treaty
Smith and -r, , n tt t'- n i ■ i • t
McClatchie -Torts, and Hong Kong, and report upon then- relative advantages
for the new Mission. This commission they fulfilled, and their
reports and letters, printed at great length in the CM. Record, are
exceedingly interesting, especially as read in the light of the
immense development of missionary work in China since then. It
was only in the Ports themselves that any definite agencies could
be set on foot. A treaty obtained by the United States immediately
after the British one gave the right, within the Ports, to build
churches and hospitals ; but no European could go more than half
a day's journey beyond the city walls, as he was obliged to be back
by nightfall. But the Mandarins were very courteous, and seemed
ready to pay respect to any religious teachers. At Amoy, for
instance, the five chief Mandarins invited all the missionaries there,
during Smith's visit, to an entertainment, and placed them in the
seats of honour, complimenting them on bringing a religion tending
to the peace and harmony of mankind. '■= Fuh-chow seems to have
impressed Smith more than any other of the Ports ; but there were
exceptional difficulties in the way of getting in there. Canton,
Amoy, and Hong Kong, were already occupied by other Missions.
Shanghai and Ningpo, therefore — though the former w^as already
occupied, — were reported as the most likely places. McClatchie
quickly took up his permanent residence at Shanghai ; but Smith's
health failed, and he returned to England after two years' absence.
The Society published his Narrative of Travel in China, which had
a large sale, and did much to interest the Christian public in the
Celestial Empire.!
The Committee now issued an earnest appeal for more mission-
aries, and particularly for University men. Again it pleased God
to give them the encouragement of a speedy response. Two
* Speech of the Rev. G-. Smith at Exeter Hall, May, 18-i7. llissio'nary
Register, 1847, p. 376.
I A good summary of his travels and experiences is given by Miss Headland
in her biographical sketch of him, in Brief Sketches of C.M.S. Workers
(Nisbet, 1897).
The Opening of China 473
Dublin f:fradiiatps canio forwavtl, William Armstrong; Eussell and Part Y.
William Farmer. They received some further iheolciffical iusli-uc- l''<-tl--18.
tion at Islington College, and were ordained by the Bishop of '"^'" ' ***
London on May 13th, 1847. In October they were admitted to
priest's orders and taken leave of ; and on November 10th they
sailed for China. And a third man went with them, Eobert Henry
Cobbold, a double-honour man from Peterhouse, Cambridge, who
had had three years' ministerial experience, and was curate of
Melton Mowbray. Farmer was to join McClatchie at Shanghai,
and Russell and Cobbold were to start a new Mission at Ningpo. Russell
To have a Mission manned entirely by University men was a new cobboid.
thing for the Society ; but the interest aroused in China at the
time was great, and the Connnittee indulged in high hopes of
opei'ations on an unusually extensive scale. Smith's book
exercised considerable influence ; and his speeches also brought
the claims of the newly-opened Empire before numerous
Christian circles. At the Anniversary Meeting in 1847 he said, —
" The opening in China will absorb, for many years to come, all
the materials for missionary strength and effectiveness at the
disposal of the Committee."
Two further developments of C.M.S. work must be noticed in
this chapter, as they just fall within the proper limits of the
present section of our History. On February 12th, 1849, it W'as
announced to the Committee that the Rev. George Smith, the g. Smith
pioneer missionary to China above referred to, had been appointed ^f vifiorfa*!
to the new^ Bishopric of Victoria, Hong Kong. The establishment
of this see had been strongly urged upon the Government by Lord
Chichester and Henry Venn, and an endowment was provided, in
the main, by the liberality of an anonymous donor, a friend of the
S.P.G. and S.P.C.K. The S.P.G. also made a grant. Venn's
influence with Archbishop Sumner, and with the Colonial Oflice,
procured the appointment of George Smith ; and he was con-
secrated "-^^ on Whit Tuesday, May 29th, 1849, together with Bishop
Anderson for Rupert's Land — another new see strongly pressed on
the attention of Government, and of the Colonial Bishoprics Fund,
by the Church Missionary Society. Both Smith and Anderson
were men of a true missionary spirit, and both did admirable work.
We shall see more of them both by-and-by.
The other move forward was the resolve to start a Mission at Fuh-chow
Fuh-chow. This was urged by Bishop Smith, and it was arranged planned,
to send a reinforcement out to China with him, two members of
which should proceed to Fuh-chow. Again, University men were
appealed for; and again God raised them up. Another double-
honour Cambridge man offered, F. F. Gough, Scholar of St.
John's, and Curate of St. Luke's, Birmingham ; also a Caius man, More men.
W. Welton, a qualified surgeon as well as a clergj-man, from
Suffolk ; also a Dublin graduate, E. T. R. Moncrieff", Curate of
* In Canterbury Cathedral. See Vol. II. p. 313.
474 The Opening of China
Part V. Achurch, Oundle. Gough was instructed to join Enssell at
Cha^~30 -^^^§P°' Farmer having left China invahded, and having died on the
^" ■ voyage home ; Moncrieff was to accompany the Bishop to Hong
Kong as tutor in St. Paul's College there, a new institution founded
by the efforts and the liberal gifts of the chaplain before mentioned,
Mr. Stanton ; and Welton, and an Islington man, E. D. Jackson,
were appointed to Fuh-chow. On November 5th, 1849, they all
sailed with the Bishop. Another Islington man, John Hobson,
had sailed earlier in the year,
nofi'ifthe ^° *^^® outlook was promising. But the C.M.S. China Mission
front in has uevcr been in the front rank of agencies in the Land of Sinim,
India and Africa have generally claimed the largest places in the
Society's thoughts ; and it is only quite recently that its China
Mission has much expanded. The London Missionary Society,
and the American Societies, have always taken a more important
part in the work ; and of course in later years the China Inland
Mission has far exceeded all others in the number of its labourers
and the extent of its operations. But the work is one ; Christ's
servants are one ; the spiritual Church into which so many
thousands of Chinamen have been admitted is one ; the Faith in
which they have lived and died is one ; the Home into which they
are gathering is one. Many regiments are at work in China ; but
they are one Army, under one Divine Captain.
China.
CHAPTER XXXI.
The Society's Finances.
Earliest Contributions — The Associations in 1820 — London and the
Provinces in 1848 — Comparison with the Present Time — A Mis-
sionary-box at Sea — The Expenditure of the Half-Century — The
Financial Crisis of 1841 — ^Plans of the Special Committee — What
are the " Talents " given to a Society ? — An Income Tax for
C.M.S. — An Appeal on Protestant Principles — Its Results.
" Noiu concerning the coUection." — 1 Cor. xvi. 1.
"It is required in atfruuirds, tliat a man he found faithful." — 1 Cor. iv. 2.
i|T this point it seems desirable to give a brief account of Part Y.
the Society's funds during its first half-century ; how lS-il-48.
they were raised, and how they were expended. Chap^Sl.
In the first five years of the Society's existence, Early free-
its funds were derived entirely from what may be ^^'" °^"'
called m the fullest sense " freewill offerings." No money
was asked for in the first instance ; and the donations (" bene-
factions " as they were, and still are, called), with two or
three hundred annual subscriptions, mostly the time-honoured
guinea, which came in unsought, and amounted in the five
years to a total of £2461, sufficed to pay the preliminary
expenses and the earliest charges for the first two missionaries.
Indeed almost from the beginning the Committee began to invest
surplus monies, and thus to " put by for a rainy day "; and seven
East India 10 per cent, bonds of £100 each, purchased out of the
above-mentioned total, formed the first reserve fund. Consols
were afterwards liought ; and the balance-sheet of 1807 records
the receipt of dividends " less ten per cent. Propertjj Tax." In the
spring of 1804, when two missionaries had actually sailed, a
circular was issued to friendly clergy asking for contributions, and
particularly for congregational collections. The response was First
immediate. Within a few weeks, twenty-six parishes had made '^^u^'cj^.
11 ■ •I'll 1 1 -\ r c collections.
collections, either m church or by personal canvass. Most of
these were in small towns and villages ; but St. Mai'y's Chapel,
Birmingham (Rev. E. Burn), heads the list with £58, and Holy
Trinity, Cambridge (C. Simeon), stands next with £50. In the
following year, Bentinck Chapel (Basil Woodd) stands first with
£240 ; and this West End congregation kept the lead for many
years. In 1804 the first legacy was received, £20, from a London
Chai). 81.
476 The SociErv''s Finances
Part Y. man ; and on Christmas Day, 1808, the first Smiday-school
j«-n-f^8- collection was made at Matlock (Rev. Philip Gell), £4 lis. M.
Progress, however, was slow ; and £3000 in one year was not
reached till 1812-13. But in the following year, that amount was
quadrupled, £13,200 being received. This was due to the establish-
ment of Associations, and the journeys of Basil Woodd, Legh
Richmond, Daniel Wilson, and others, all over the country, as
described in our eleventh chapter. So successful were these new
efforts, that the Income for a time grew faster than the Expendi-
ture ; and in 1816 the Committee congratulated their friends on
the "pleasing circumstance " that the Expenditure was "keeping
pace with the Income"! It really needed expanding work to
effect this ; for the Income not only suddenly leaped in 1812-13
from £3000 to £13,000, but rose in 1817-18 to £24,000, and in
1819-20 to £30,000, thus increasing tenfold in seven years.
Let us see what the financial results of the new Association
system were, more in detail ; and let us take as a specimen the
year 1819-20, when the system had been at work seven years.
The total collected in that year, through the Associations, and
excluding contributions sent direct to the Society, was £25,000.
Of this amount London stands for just one-tenth, £2500. St.
John's Chapel, Bedford Row (Daniel Wilson), stands first with
£563; then Clapham (Deal try), £383; Percy Chapel (Haldane
Stewart), £302 ; Bentinck Chapel (Basil Woodd), £259 ; Wheler
Chapel (Pratt and Bickersteth), £147. The first three of these
items account for one-half of the whole sum. The only parish
churches, besides Clapham, that did anything substantial, were
St. James's, Clerkenwell, £128, and Christ Church, Newgate
Street, £79. Kensington does not appear at all, nor Marylebone ;
Paddington is represented only by Bentinck Chapel ; Islington by
a ladies' association raising £57 ; Hampstead by one guinea
subscriber, and " a few children, £2 8.S-. OcZ." South of the Thames,
except Clapham, there are only Southwark, £172 ; Kennington,
£58 ; Brixton, £7.
M^^>t Then, leaving London, and beginning with the Northern
Counties, we find a Newcastle Association, which comprises both
Northumberland and Durham, and sends £300 (Durham city
£20) ; Cumberland contributing £276 (Carlisle, where Fawcett was,
£226), and Westmoreland £160, Kirkby Lonsdale, under the
influence of the Carus Wilsons, standing for £100 of this.
Lancashire's total is £940, of which Manchester supplies £452
(St. James's £157; St. Clement's and St. Stephen's also in
front) ; Liverpool £325 (St. Andrew's £153, and St. Mark's £80) ;
and Preston £136. Yorkshire beats London, with its £3070, of
which £710 came from York, £553 from Hull and neighbourhood,
£542 from Leeds, £200 each from Sheffield and Huddersfield,
£153 from Knaresborough, £143 from Halifax ; while Dewsbury,
Doncaster, and Bradford follow. Cheshire sent £506, of which
£204 came from the village of Latchford.
North,
The Society^s Flyaxces 477
Coming into the Midlands, we, find Lincolnshire sending £338 Part Y.
(Gainsborough standing for £121); Notts, £410 (Nottingham l«-H-tH.
£255); Derbyshire, £720 (chiefly Derby; Ashbourne £173); <^'''^';=^'-
Staffordshire, £770 (North Staff., £300 ; Tamworth £260) ; Shrop- in the Mid-
shire, where John Langley was at work, £622 (Wellington £127, '^"ds,
and Madeley £117 ; the rest chiefly Shrewsbury) ; Herefordshire,
£379 ; Worcestershire, £342 (Worcester £114, and Bewdley
£93) ; Warwickshire, £894 (Birmingham £636 ; Coventry £120) ;
Leicestershire, £827 (due to Vaughan's influence) ; Rutland, £38 ;
Northamptonshire, £430 (Creaton £173) ; Gloucestershire, without
Bristol, £840 (North-east Forest of Dean Association, £190 ;
Campden £113) ; Oxfordshire, £118 ; Berks, £368 ; Bucks, £210 ;
Herts, £13 ; Beds, £107.
In the East, there are Norfolk, £776 (chiefly Norwich, but Lynn in the East
and Wymondham contributing) ; Suffolk, £443 ; Cambridgeshire, ^" °" '
£276; Essex, £570 (Colchester leading). In the South, Kent
stands for £303, but of this £187 is from Blackheath ; Surrey (not
including Claphara, &c.) for £350, of which £81 is from Rich-
mond ; Sussex for only £167 (mostly Chichester and Hastings) ;
Hants for £510, more than half of it from the Channel Islands,
but Portsea stands for £93 ; Dorset for £353 ; Wilts for £71 ;
Somerset for £754 (Bath £334, Yeovil £187) ; Devon for £477
(Devonport £140, Teignmouth £92) ; Cornwall for £195. Bristol,
reckoned always as a separate county, heads all other Associations
with £1755. JHunts and Monmouthshire do not appear at all.
Wales sends £247, of which £152 is from Glasbury. The ^"^J^^^^^^-
Edinburgh Association stands for £300 ; and Ii-eland for the round ir^eUnS. '
figure of £2000, evidently the sum remitted within the year, but
not necessarily corresponding exactly with the amount collected.
The Isle of Man is down for £5.
It will be seen that the great watering-place Associations are No great
conspicuous by their absence. There are no Brighton or Worthing ^tces'."^'
or Eastbourne ; no Ramsgate or Margate or Dover or Folkestone ;
no Southsea or Sandown or Bournemouth ; no Ilfracombe or
Weston-super-Mare ; no Southport or Blackpool ; no Scarborough
or Cromer ; no Harrogate or Leamington or Tunbridge Wells.
Bath, Cheltenham, Torquay, Teignmouth, and Hastings, seem the
only representatives in the list of this fruitful class of contributing
towns ; though Clifton was an important part of the Bristol
Association.
Coming forward into sul)sequent years, we And the Associations The asso-
growing, but somewhat intermittently. Between 1824 and 1834, the jubilee
they went up and down between £35,000 and £45,000. In the p"'"^-
year of the Queen's Accession they reached £61,000, and in the
'forties they averaged about £75,000. Let us take the year before
the Jubilee, 1847-8, and again examine the details.
In that year, London — which was defined as within five
miles of St. Paul's — still kept its place as contributing (through
478
The Society'' s Finances
Associations) about one-tenth of the Association income, £7200.
There was then a City of London Auxihary, which had been
founded in 1840 at a meeting at the Mansion House, summoned
by the Lord Mayor in response to a requisition signed by seven
hundred citizens. When its first annual meeting was held, again
at the Mansion House, on November 2nd, 1841, it was found
that £1700 had been raised by it in the year. On this occasion,
Bishop Blomfield, who had just joined the Society,''' and Bishop
Selwyn, who had just been consecrated,! were among the speakers.
The contributions, however, did not keep up at that level, and in
the year we are now reviewing, 1847-8, the amount was only
£434. But this consisted mainly of a great many guinea sub-
scriptions from City firms, which, evidently, were regularly
canvassed.
Among the other metropolitan Associations, the most con-
spicuous feature is the rise of Islington, w^hich, with only seven
churches, stands for £1500 ; St. James's being first, as it has
been ever since. The other chief figures are, Clapham, £528 ;
Chelsea (three churches), £534; St. John's Chapel, Bedford Eow,
£478; North-East London, £406; Camberwell, £386; Hampstead,
£373 ; St. George's, Bloomsbury, £325. Kensington is again
conspicuous by its absence. Paddington — Bentinck Chapel having
disappeared — is only represented by Bayswater Chapel (the pre-
cursor of the present St. Matthew's), £130. Proprietary chapels
are still (barring Islington, Clapham, and Bloomsbury) the
centres of evangelical life. Besides those above-mentioned, we
find Charlotte Chapel, Pimlico ; Park Chapel, Chelsea ; Christ
Chapel, Maida Hill ; Chapel of Ease, Islington ; Pentonville
Chapel ; Gray's Inn Eoad Episcopal Chapel ; St. John's Chapel,
Hampstead ; Eam's Chapel, Homerton ; Lock Chapel, Eaton
Chapel, Belgrave Chapel, Percy Chapel, Long Acre Chapel,
Bridewell Chapel, Fitzroy Chapel ; St. James's Chapel, Maryle-
bone ; Holland Chapel, Brixton ; Camden Chapel, Camberwell ;
Stockwell Chapel; Carlisle Chapel, Kennington ; St. Mary's
Chapel, Lambeth. A few of these still exist, but most of them
have long since been replaced by consecrated churches. But in
1847-8, there were collections for the Society in only twenty-two
regular churches, mostly of very small amounts. The clergy of
London whose congregations did the most were. Baptist Noel at
St. John's, Bedford Eow ; Montagu Villiers at Bloomsbury,
Smalley at Bayswater, Pisk at Maida Hill, Grifiith at Homerton,
E. Montgomery at Percy Chapel, Daniel Moore at Camden
Chapel, Jowett at Clapham ; D. Wilson, Hambleton, Mackenzie,
Sandys, and E. Hoare, at Islington; Cadman, Niven, and
Burgess at Chelsea.
Proceeding into the Provinces, we find Yorkshire easily first,
with £9800, and Lancashire next with £6575. No other county
See p. 395.
t Sec
tlG.
The SocietyK"; Finances
479
exceeds £3000. Between £2000 and £3000 we find, in oixler, Part V.
Somerset, Sussex, Stafford, Warwick, Suffolk, Kent, Hants. l«-ii-4'8.
Between £1500 and £2000 are Norfolk, Gloucester, Cheshire, ^I'^pj?!.
Surrey, Bristol, Lincoln, Devon. Between £1000 and £1500,
Derby, Essex, Notts, Leicester, Shropshire, Worcester. Between
£800 and £1000, Durham, Dorset, Cambridge, Wilts, Berks,
Herts, Northampton, Middlesex (outside London). Between
£500 and £700, Oxford, Bucks, Cumberland, Northumberland,
Hunts, Cornwall. Below £500, Hereford, Monmouth, Beds,
Westmoreland, Isle of Man, Eutland. Wales stands for £1542 ;
Scotland for £643 ; Ireland for £1300.
One cannot compare these figures with those of the present Then and
time without l)eing struck by the relatively great advance in later "°^'
years of the Southern Counties, especially those near London, in
comparison with that of the North. Taking the two ecclesiastical
Provinces of Canterbury and York, we find that the former,
although hampered by the slow progress of some midland
counties, has increased by about 155 per cent., while the latter
has increased by only about eighty-five per cent. Yorkshire
in particular has increased by only thirty-four per cent. In
1847-8 Yorkshire contributed nearly twelve per cent, of the
whole ; now, only seven per cent. Great towns like Hull and
Huddersfield have actually gane back. On the other hand,
Middlesex, Herts, Essex, Kent, Surrey, Sussex, Hants, which
in 1847-8 contributed together twenty-five per cent, of the
whole, now contribute thirty-six per cent. Ireland has multi-
plied its contribution by twelve : it then gave one and two-
thirds per cent. ; now it gives eight and a half per cent. This
is the most striking feature of all in the comparison. Next to it
is the rise of the watering-places as contributors. The five
watering-places (not reckoning Clifton) mentioned above as con-
triliuting in 1819-20 sent then together £600. The same five, in
1847-8, sent £2900 ; and thirteen of the others mentioned sent
£2800, Brighton leading with £1335. The five, in 1896-7, sent
£6000, and the thirteen £14,000 ; while Bournemouth, Southsea,
Sandown, Worthing, Folkestone, Blackpool, which do not appear
in 1847-8, added £4000 in 1896-7, making a total of £24,000 from
tw^enty-four watering-places, or just twelve per cent, of the whole
Association Income. But a reference to the present day is
scarcely relevant in this chapter.
Eegular Parochial Associations under the clergy were much Methods of
more conmion in 1848 than in 1820. The old non-parochial funds.^
Ladies' Associations for a whole town, however, were still
numerous, and did a large part of the best work. Organized
Juvenile Associations rarely appear in the lists, and the Lanca-
shire Sunday-schools are not so prominent as in subsequent
years. Sales of work also are few ; but one at York, in 1839,
reahzed £1000, including a gift of £10 from Queen-Dowager
Adelaide. A much large), proportion of the contributions in most
48o
The Society''s Finances
Part V.
1841-48.
Chap. 31.
Legacies.
A mission'
ary box
saves a
ship.
Views of
Associa-
tion Secre-
taries.
parishes seems to have come from ordinary guinea subscriptions.
That is to say, other sources of income had not been much
cultivated, while this one was well worked by the lady collectors.
Penny-a-week collections, also, from house to house, were then a
common method of raising money.
The Association Income in those days was a more important
element in the Society's Funds even than it is now. Instead of
providing three-fifths or two-thirds of the total as at present, it
provided four-fifths or even five-sixths. Benefactions and sub-
scriptions paid direct to headquarters supplied about one-tenth
of the whole, and legacies not more than one-twentieth. But
on two occasions large legacies were received. In 1835, Mr.
Cock, of Colchester, bequeathed his estate to various institutions,
and the Society's share realized over £5000 ; and in 1846 a legacy
from Mr. John Scott realized over £7000. Apart from the latter,
the average from this source in the 'forties was under £4000.
The missionary-box was from a very early period an important
means of collecting small sums. Some pleasant incidents of zeal
and self-denial in connexion with boxes are recorded from time
to time. One incident, of a different kind, should be recorded.
During the short war with the United States in 1812-14, an
American privateer captured a small Welsh collier in the Irish
Channel. The captain of the privateer, noticing in the cabin a
strange little box with a slit in it, asked what it was. " x\h ! "
replied the Welshman, " I and my poor fellows drop a penny
apiece into that ]:)ox every Sunday, to help to send missionaries
to the Heathen." "Indeed," exclaimed the American, "that's a
good thing ! " A Inief pause ensued, and then the victor suddenly
said, " I won't touch your vessel, nor a hair of your heads " ; and,
summoning his men, he returned to his own ship, leaving the
collier with the missionary-box to go its own way free ! '■''
In Henry Venn's Private Journal, there is an account of the
Annual Conference of the Society's Association Secretaries in
January, 1850, shortly after the Jubilee. The unanimous judg-
ment of the Association Secretaries was " that the Society's
Income might be sustained at its present point, but that there
was no prospect of increase." Has there ever been an Annual
Conference at which the same opinion has not been expressed ? f
And yet — !
We must now turn to the Society's Expenditure. A ghmpse of
the way in which the early funds were spent on the first mis-
sionaries going to West Africa was given in the curious entries
quoted in our Eighth Chapter. ;|: The sudden increase in the Income
in 1813, and its rapid growth for several years afterwards, due to
* Missionary Register, 1814, p. .514.
t Until 1898. In January, 1898, the Reports of the Association Secretaries
were marked by a hopeful tone quite different from that of previous years.
X See p. 87.
The Society's Finances 481
the establishment of the Associations, enabled the Society to Part V.
start and develop the Missions in India, Ceylon, the Mediter- I84l-t8.
ranean, and New Zealand. The India Missions soon accounted Chapel,
for a third, or two-lifths, of the whole foreign Expenditure ; indeed. The Expen-
of the whole £1,500,000 spent (exclusive of local funds) in the d'ture.
mission-field in the Society's first half-century, India and Ceylon
together absorbed just one-half. The cost of the New Zealand
Mission also became heavy, exceeding £16,000 in 1839. In the
same year the West Indies work cost £19,000, but towards this
the Government granted £2000 for schools. The cheapest of all
the Missions (except the tentative efforts in South Africa and
Australia) was that in Rupert's Land, its cost at that same date
not exceeding £1000.
Of each pound sterling of the total Expenditure of the first
half-century, al^out 14.s. 4f/. was incurred directly for the Missions ;
Is. Id. for disabled missionaries, care of children, &c. ; Is. Id. for
training of missionaries ; and 2.s. Wd. for home charges proper,
including collection of funds, publications, and administration. It
ought, indeed, to be borne in mind that "Publications" then
included translations and linguistic works ; but even allowing for
this, the percentage of home expenditure was considerably higher
than at present.
The expenditure on reports and periodicals was very high in the Cost of
'forties. The Annual Report cost on an average nearly £1300 a tions.*^^"
year, or two-thirds w^hat it does now, although it w^as not half
its present size, and the circulation many thousands of copies less.
The periodicals '■' averaged £2500 a year in cost, of which al^out
£150 was got back in sales. The corresponding periodicals now
cost over £5000, but almost the whole of this comes back in sales.
The average number of papers circulated in the 'forties was about
a million a year, chiefly small papers ; and the nett cost (ex-
cluding Annual Reports) was nearly £3000 a year. The number
now is four or five million, nearly half of it substantial magazines,
and the nett cost is £2500.
For many years from 1813 on^vard, the Income so much ex-
ceeded the Expenditure that substantial amounts were invested invested
in Government securities, and formed a useful working capital, f""'^^-
In the later 'twenties, the expansion of some of the Missions —
especially in India, where the Corresponding Committees kept
drawing on the Society beyond the amounts sanctioned, — and the
establishment of the College at Islington, encroached largely on
this reserve, and in 1830 a Committee of Investigation was ap-
pointed, which led to some economies, and to the starting of a
Fund for Sick and Disabled Missionaries, as by this time the
burden of providing for them was pressing on the Society. At
the same time, however, it was found necessary to increase the
Expenditure on Home Organization with a view to extending the
* See Chapter XXXV.
VOL. I. I i
4^2 The Society^ s Finances
Part V. Assocications and so raising larger funds. The effort was success -
rf!*^~tt ful ; and in 1836 the Society had £30,000 invested in Government
lap^ . gi^Qjji^g^ while the Committee were largely increasing its responsi-
bilities in India and New Zealand, undertaking extensive work in
the West Indies, and planning the short-lived Australia and South
Africa Missions. The result, especially of the West Indies Mis-
sion, was speedy financial embarrassment ; and this culminated
71.^ great in a serious crisis in 1841-2, the very year of the adhesion of the
1841-2.°^ Bishops and of Henry Venn becoming Secretary. On March 31st,
1842, the Society had not only used the whole of its reserve, but
had had to obtain loans from members of the Committee to the
extent of £11,500, while considerable debts were due to trades-
men. There was the Disabled Missionaries' Fund, then £17,000,
which could not be touched ; and there were the College premises :
that was all — for even the House in Salisbury Square was only
rented.
The Appendix to the Eeport of that year contains valuable
reports from successive sub-committees appointed to investigate
Special ^^^ consider the whole position. The last of these sub-com-
Committee. mittees consisted of four influential bankers not actively engaged
in the Society's administration, viz., Sir Walter E. Farquhar, the
Hon. Arthur Kinnaird (afterwards Lord Kinnaird), Mr. H. Sykes
Thornton, and the Society's Treasurer, Mr. John Thornton.
Drastic Very drastic measures were proposed, and adopted by the Com-
proposa s. j-j^i|^^gg_ Several Missions were to be given up, including all those
in the Mediterranean and the West Indies, the smaller work in
Australia and South Africa, and Nor tli- West America; and by
this means £22,000 a year was to be saved. Then, no new
missionaries were to be sent out, except to fill vacancies in the
Missions to be maintained, and no new students to be admitted
to Islington, except, in like manner, to fill vacancies. Then, all
legacies, and all benefactions over £5, were to be applied to the
payment of the debt, and to forming gradually a capital fund of
£30,000. To this end, also special contributions were invited,
and Lord Bexley, the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, to
whose suggestion this plan was diie, started the fund with a
donation of £100. Finally a Finance Committee was to be
appointed, without whose sanction no expense of any kind was to
be incurred. But in one direction, the expenditure was to be in-
creased. The Home Organization was again to be extended.
That, the Committee knew, was spending a little to produce
much.
t^Te'^ob'" In the course of these reports, some important principles are
served. laid down. First, that buildings for public worship in the
Colonies, e.g. in Sierra Leone, ought to be provided by the
Responsi- Government. " This obhgation, indeed," say the Sub-Committee,
Govern^- " ^^^^ heeu Uniformly acknowledged by successive Colonial
ment, Secretaries; but they have not hitherto fulfilled the obhgation."
Like the son who said to his father, "I go, sir," and went not.
The Society's Fixances 483
A modern Colonial Secretary would be more likely to resemble Part V.
the other son, who said, " I will not " ; and it would be surprising 1841-48.
indeed if he " afterward repented." Secondly, " It is obligatoiy ^^'I'^P-^l-
on a Christian Government to take measures for the endowment
and establishment of a Native Church." The recital of this
principle and the preceding one significantly illustrates the change
of feeling in half a century. Then, thirdly, the local contribu- of friends
tions of friends in India and elsewhere ought to provide all ^^^°^'^'
buildings, such as churches, schools, and other institutions, and
the repairs of them, — except what might be done by Government ;
and also maintain all orphans and other children in boarding-
schools, — the Society's funds being only drawn upon for the
maintenance of " seminaries," i.e. divinity schools and other
i nstitutions for training native agents. This is a principle of more
permanent value, though it is acted upon now less regularly
than in those days. Fourthly, in these reports we find the first of Native
clear enunciation of the principle of the self-support of Native christians.
Churches : —
" All missionary operations should, from the first, contain within
themselves the germ of the self-supporting principle. . . . Native con-
verts should be habituated to the idea that the support of a Native
Ministry must eventually fall upon themselves ; as, in their heathen
state, they have been accustomed to bear the expense of heathen minis-
trations. ... It is not meant that Native converts should contribute
toward the maintenance of European agents ; but it may be reasonably
expected that tliey should, from the first, bear some portion, however
small, of the necessary expenses of Native ministrations, and of the
Christian education of their children.
'• The Society would be thus effectually preparing the way for the
transfer of such Native Christian congregations to the regular Ecclesias-
tical Establishment ; and leaving itself at liberty to go forward in the
work of breaking up the fallow-ground of Heathenism, which is the
peculiar province of a missionary society."
Once more, fifthly, a principle that has often been set forth is
very well expressed by the four bankers : —
" It appears to us that the golden rule and principle of restricthig Relation of
expenditure within income, equally ajiplicable to conununities and to Expendi-
individuals, ought, in a religious society, to obtain in a far higher income
degree, inasmuch as its aim and end a^e sacred. It is called upon,
indeed, to occupy diligently with the talents committed to it ; hut not
to aim at occupying with more talents than God in His wdsdom has been
pleased to dispense : and therefore it is our full persuasion that the
Divine Blessing cannot be expected without a firm adherence to this
sacred principle."
Yes, admirably stated ; yet two things are forgotten. One is But what
that the " talents " which God gives a missionary society are, not ^''taknts^-.?
the money, but the men ; and if He sends the men — not other-
W'ise — it is only reasonable to believe that He will send the
money for their support. Our responsibility lies in taking
measures to secure that the men accepted are trulv sent bv Him.
I i 2
484
The Society's Finances
Part V.
1841 -i8.
Chap. 31.
A plain
fallacy.
An appeal
on Pro-
testant
principles.
Striking
speech of
J.W.Cun-
ningham.
An Income
Tax for
C.M.S.
Then again, even if the Society's income be taken as the
"talent," it is not a fixed amount. It is not hke a dividend on
an investment, which can be counted on. It is impossible to
know what the year's Income will be till the year is finished.
Therefore, the only possible way of observing the rule laid down
in the words quoted would be to incur no expenditure till a whole
year's income is in hand, and then to regulate it accordingly.
The four bankers recommended that the Society's expenditure
be hmited to £85,000 ; but how could they tell that £85,000 would
be received ? All depended upon God inclining the hearts of His
people to give ; and why should it be supposed that He would do
this to the extent of £85,000, neither more nor less? In fact the
principle laid down is in the highest degree excellent ; but it is
usually applied, and was applied by them, in a way that involves
fallacies which are quite obvious when fairly looked at.
In their own Annual Eeport, the Committee, while accepting
the proposals made to them, appealed earnestly for fresh support
to enable them at the same time to go forward in Africa and
India. And they based their appeal distinctly upon their Evan-
gelical principles, thus showing that the Society's new eccle-
siastical position was not to involve any compromise of them : —
" Let not this appeal of the Committee be mistaken. Let it not be
supposed that it is on gold, or silver, or patronage, that they found
their hopes of success. God forbid ! It is the faithful, plain, and full
maintenam-e of those great principles of the truth as it is in Jesus, by
all the agents and missionaries of this Society, without compromise and
without reserve — it is the sustentation of that Scriptural, Protestant, and
Evangelical tone throughout all their ministrations — it is the upholding
of the Bible, and the Bible alone, as the foundation and rule of faith —
upon which the blessing of God has rested, does rest, and ever will rest."
Never before had the Committee spoken so plainly. They were
Henry Venn's sentences, in the first Eeport that he wrote. With
this unmistakable language did the man who had been the chief
instrument in bringing the Society and the Bishops together
mai'k his accession to office.
At the Annual Meeting, J. W. Cunningham was commissioned to
speak on the financial position, andan admirable speech he delivered.
What would be thought, he* asked, of the Committee being locked
up in the King's Bench (i.e. in the debtors' prison at that time) for
spending too much, not on themselves, but on the salvation of the
world ! One of his suggestions is interesting. That was the year
when Sir Eobert Peel first imposed the Income Tax, sevenpence in
the pound. " When we first heard of it," said Cunningham, " we
were all confounded ; and people began to look anxiously at their
account-books. But we have been able to accommodate ourselves
to our circumstances. We don't like it, but our faces are not
now so long about it as they were. Well, what the Society
icants froiii yoio is cm income-tax. Sir E. Peel says Id. in the £
will produce £4,000,000. Now supposing every one of us, as we
The Society's Finances 485
have gradually made \\\> our minds to the Id. in the £, were only Part V.
to add another halfpenny in the pound for missionari/ objects ? " rf^^"^'
It does not appear that this suggestion was adopted ! But ^'^''" '
the Committee's general ajDpeal was not in vain. When May, 18-13, The
came round, they had to report the receipt of the largest income srt^^gM.
ever, up to that time, received by any religious society, £115,000.
All the debt except £1000 had been paid off ; a good beginning had
been made in the formation of a capital fund ; the special gift of
£6000 Consols had been made to begin a Mission in China ; and
although large reductions had been effected, as recommended, in
some of the Missions, there was good hope of being able to
continue some of the Mediterranean stations, and British Guiana,
and North-Went America. The Report began — an unusual thing
in those days — with a text : " The Lord hath done great things
for us, whereof we are glad." And the Committee thus referred
to their declaration of principles a year before :—
" Taking thoir stand upon the Protestant and Evanojelical principles
by wliieli the Society liad ever reauhxted its course, [the Connnittee]
awaited the result of the trial : whether a Society, cleaving humbly but
faithfully to these principles, would be rescued from its peril, or be
allowed to sink under pecuniary embarrassments."
And again, in 1844 : —
" Upon these principles the Committee took their stand in a season
of jeopardy ; upon these principles they uuxde their appeal for special
assistance ; and to these principles, under God, they owe their present
prosperity. Therefore they regard themselves as boiuid, by new and
most cogent obligations, to guard witli the utmost vigilance against all
surrender or compromise of principle tlu-oughout the various ramifica-
tions of their widely-extended agency : that as far as human means can
provide, the (jospel preached may not be ' another Gospel,' but the very
Gospel of the grace of God, ])ublished in and by the open volume of in-
spiration ; such as the Reforming Fatliers of our beloved Clnu-ch exhibited
in their lives, illustrated in their writings, and testified with their blood."
During the four or five succeedmg years, the Income varied as
usual ; but the general improvement in the financial position was
maintained, and in 1847 the Capital Fund had reached £30,000; the
new Special China Fund had received £15,000 ; and there was no
deficit. " Amidst the many special mercies," said the Committee
in their Jubilee Statement, " which mark the history of the
Society, this providential release from serious financial embarrass-
ment is not the least remarkable." And similar experiences have
attended the later history, as we shall see. Again and again have in later
pecuniary difhculties been encountered. Again and again have y^^"-
the Committee " asked the Lord, and told His people." Their
faith has often been severely tried. But God's faithfulness has
never failed. Just in so far as we have been able to trust Him,
in that proportion have all our needs been supplied.
CHAPTER XXXII.
The Jubilee.
Part V.
1841-48.
Chap. 32.
The
Jubilee not
Europe and England in 1848 — Survey of the Half-Century's Work — •
Jubilee Tracts — Jubilee Services and Gatherings — The Great
Meeting: Lord Chichester, Sir R. Inglis, Bishop Wilberforce,
Cunningham, Bickersteth, Hoare — Observances in the Provinces
and in the Mission-Field — Death of H. W. Fox — The Fox Sermon
at Rugby — The Jubilee Fund — The Queen becomes a Life
Governor — Fox's Jubilee Hymn.
" Ye shall hallow the fiftieth, year . . . it shall he a juiile unto you.'' —
Lev. XXV. 10.
" 0 praise tlie Lord . . . for His vicrciftd Vindness is ever more and more
towards us." — Ps. cxvii. 1, 2 (P.B.V.).
ERY modest was the first announcement of the advent
of the Society's Jubilee Year. It would almost seem
as if its approach had been unexpected. We have
liefore seen that for at least forty years after the
Society was founded, the real date of its foundation
whyf ^'^ ■ ^V'^^ ^^o^ generally recognized. The Report presented at the May
Anniversary of 1847 is called the Report " for the Forty-Seventh
Year." During the next twelve months, however, the truth
seems to have dawned upon the mind of Salisbury Square, for
the next Report, presented May, 1848, appeared with no corre-
sponding figure, " for the Year," but opened with the
following paragraph, intimating, in the quietest and most un-
exciting language, that the year just closed was not the Forty-
Eighth, but the Forty-Ninth, and that therefore the Jubilee Year
was now commencing : —
" The present is the Forty-eighth occasion on which the Committee of
the Church Missionary Society have met their constituents to render an
account of their trust. But as the Society was instituted on the 1:2th of
April, 1799, and as the first Pubhc Meeting was deferred till the close
of the second year from the formation of the Society, there is a very
special interest attached to this epoch, as the commencement of the
Fiftieth Year of the Society's existence — the year of Jubilee according to
the reckoning of a Divine ordinance under the old Law."
The chairman at the Anniversary Meeting at which this
announcement was read was not the President, Lord Chichester,
but the new Arclibishop of Canterbury, John Bird Sumner, who
The
Jubilee an-
nounced.
The fuBiLEE 4S7
had only succeeded to the Primacy a few weeks before. It was a Part v.
happy augury for the Society that its Jubilee Year should ^'^'^'^J"'';'-
commence under the auspices of one whose presence, as the "*''
Eeport proceeded to say, "combined the encouragement of a
long-standing attachment to our principles with the sanction of
the liighest ecclesiastical authority."
Tile last of the four Resolutions submitted and adopted tliat
day, which was moved by Francis Close and seconded by Edward
Bickersteth, stated that a review of the Society's fifty years'
history presented " both a pressing call and a fitting occasion
for prayer and praise," and instructed the Committee to arrange
plans for suitably commemorating the Jubilee.
The speeches at the Meeting, however, were largely inspired |*ate of
by other considerations. For the Society, which had sprung into the'^R'^to-
existence in almost the darkest period of modern history, was '"*'°"s.
attaining its Jubilee when Europe was once more in the throes of
revolution. The sudden overthrow of Louis Philippe, liis fliglit
from Paris, and the proclamation of the French Republic, in the
February of that year, had let loose the spirit and the forces of
anarchy all over the Continent. Several of the great capitals
were in the hands of revolutionary mobs ; emperors and kings had
abdicated ; Rome had risen against the Pope. Men's hearts were
failing them for fear, and for looking after those things that seemed
to be coming on the earth ; and many students of unfulfilled
prophecy announced that "the great tril)ulation " was at hand.
England, almost alone, remained at peace ; Queen Victoria's
throne, almost alone, remained unshaken. Yet there were grave
causes of anxiety at home. Ireland, which had lost one-fourth Perils at
of its population, by death or emigration, in and after the terrible °'^^'
potato famine of IS-AG, was seething with discontent; and afattious Irish
insurrection broke out under Smitli O'Brien, only, however, to be ^'"'"^'
speedily suppressed. In England itself, the Chartist agitation chartist
suddenly came to a head, and terrified the nation. Two hundred *e'*^^'°"-
thousand citizens of London were enrolled as special constables ■•'•
to protect the city on the dreaded 10th of April ; and the Duke of The loth of
Wellington kept large bodies of troops ready, but wisely hidden '"''''''■
from the pulilic view. The day, however, passed quietly ; the
gigantic procession that was to storm Parliament melted away ;
the Chartist petition reached the House of Commons in a cab ;
and nothing more was ever heard of the movement. After all,
the Chartist demands do not now seem so dreadful. Some of
them — notably voting by ballot — have long since become the law
of the land. But the alarm at the time was genuine, and in
view of the condition of the Continent, reasonable. And when,
three weeks after that memorable 10th of April, the C.M.S.
Anniversary was held, it was natural that God's infinite and
distinguishing mercy to the Realm and Nation of England
* Among whom were the skudents in the CM. College.
488
Ihe Jubilee
Part V. should be uppermost in men's thoughts. Indeed a deep sense
Chap~32 °^ solemn thankfulness pervaded the May Meetings of the year
' generally. Lord Ashley wrote in his diary : —
The Mav
Meetings. " The speeches have been altogether of a deep and feeling character
well suited to the times we live in. The effect of this month of May,
with all its attendant ceremonies, is indescribably beneficial : it is a
species of salt, and preserves, by the purification of the atmosphere
even those who do not come in contact with it."*
"To some," wrote Edward Bickersteth at the time, in a tract
to be mentioned separately, " it might appear as if the present
shaking of all the kingdoms of Europe, and the vast troubles of
every kind, social and commercial, of famine, and of approaching
cholera,! rendered this an inexpedient time for enlarged mis-
sionary exertions. A Scriptural judgment leads to an opposite
conclusion : ' famine, pestilence, and earthquakes in divers places,'
mark the very time when the ' Gospel of the kingdom ' shall be
' preached for a witness to all nations.' When God's judgments
are abroad in the earth, is the time when the inhabitants of the
world shall learn righteousness." And he goes on to exhort
Christians to turn from " the intense political excitement of this
remarkable time to the more hidden and spiritual course of mis-
sionary labour," reminding them of Elijah's experience at Horeb.
' ' It was only when the wild tumult of the elements had passed
away that Elijah had communion with his God, and a fresh
commission from Him. It was then that the ' still small voice '
sounded."
Lord Chichester, too, in his speech at the C.M.S. Anniversary,
referred both to the troubles of the time and to the Jubilee : —
" We know that when the storm arises — when the vessel is threatened
by danger, when the hearts of the crew are failing them for fear, they
must come vmto the Lord in their trouble, for He alone can deliver them
from the hour of their distress. But though it is to Him that we must
alone look, we may derive comfort under such circumstances, when we
know that whether it is in the State or in the Church there are cool
heads and brave hearts at the helm, and many bended knees amongst
the company of the ship. . . .
" We are now commencing our Jubilee Year. There is something to
me peculiarly beautiful and touching in that ancient institution of the
old dispensation. There is something peculiarly grateful in the manner
in which Almighty God commanded that jubilee to be observed. It was
proclaimed, as you know, in the day of the Atonement, and the celebra-
tion of it was a celebration purely of an Evangelical character. And
when He who was the great antitype of all those great and merciful
institutions came into the world, He was said to be anointed to preach
glad tidings to the meek and lowly of heart, to bring comfort to the
spirit-broken and oppressed, and liberty to the captive, and to open the
prison doors of those who were bound. Oh ! that you, my Christian
* Li/e of t/ie 'Earl of Shaftesbiiri/, vol. ii. p. 2.50.
■j- lu the following year was the second great visitation of cholera in
England.
" After the
fire, a still
small
voice."
Lord
Chiches-
ter's
speech.
The Jubilee 4^9
friends mif^ht, in this our Jubilee Year, manifest more of that Evan- Part V.
.^elical spirft that desires to Ughten all l)urdens, to break every yoke, and 1«^^-^-
to deliver some of those captives in Africa and Asia, who are still Lhap^i-
groaning in tlie chains of darkness, and bring them to know the Saviour
whose 'yoke is easy, and whose burden is light!"'
" Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity " was the cry of the Conti- Libmy^
nental revolutionaries ; but they knew nothing of the liberty with Fraternity,
which Christ makes His people free, nothing of the equality
which rejoices that "the same Lord over all is rich unto all that
call upon Him," nothing of the fraternity involved in union with
the One Elder Brother under the One Father. But in these truer
senses "Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity" was the message of
the Church, and of the Church Missionary Society. This then
was the very time to proclaim it.
The Society had now, for the first time, to take a systematic
review of its past history; and in due course Henry Venn
produced a valuable summary of it, under the title of the Jubilee R«;'^«^°f
Statement, which occupies ninety pages of the Jubilee Volume, years.
The results it records seem small now; but they must be
judged from the point of view of 1848, and with due regard to
the^whole circumstances of the fifty years, and then they are seen
to justify to the utmost the profound thankfulness expressed in
the Statement. The Society had sent out from Europe 350 mis-
sionaries ; ■'■= but the effectiveness of this band was not represented
by the figure 350. No less than 83 had died, after an average
service of six years; 140 had retired, chiefly from failure of
health, with an average service also of six years; and the
remaining 127 still on the staff had not yet attained an average of
ten years' service. With this force, 102 Mission stations had
been established, in Africa, Asia, America, and Australasia ; 1300
Native teachers and evangelists had been trained for work among
their fellow-countrymen, and twelve of them^had received holy
orders ; 13,000 communicants could now be reckoned, " gathered,"
says the Statement, " from the highways and hedges of the world,
but introduced as guests to the marriage feast,— beside the large
number who had departed in Christ, and been admitted into the
immediate presence of the Lord of the feast above"; and probably
100,000 souls were under Christian instruction.
" If we pause," continues the Statement, " to consider the infinite The real
benefits bestowed upon each soul brought out of darkness into light—
the sources of misery closed— the sources of life and happiness opened,
—then the statistics of our Missions, the report of tens of thousands
brought to acknowledge Christ, and of thousands becoming intelligent
partakers of His Holv Sacraments, will reveal such a rich treasury of
spiritual and eternal benefits, that to have borne the humblest part m
communicating them will be esteemed a high honour, and an abundant
grt)und of praise and thauksgiving/|
* The number on the roll to the date of the Jubilee Meeting is 387, but
this includes some who bad joined in the mission-field.
490 The Jubilee
Part Y. A survey of the mission-field itself was still more encom-aging.
Ch^^i~32 "^^^^ Committee's preliminary Circular, issued in anticipation of
lap^ . ^^ Statement, draws the following striking contrast between past
Survey of and present : —
the field,
"_We niay contrast the facilities for carrying out the design of the
Society in its early days with those which now exist. Then, all Europe
was at war with England ; India was virtually barred against mission-
aries ; New Zealand was shunned for its inhuman cruelties ; the Medi-
terranean^ Sea was occupied by hostile fleets and armaments ; in the
West Indies, the minds of the degraded Negro race were crushed with
their bodies. One spot, the colony of Sierra Leone, invited by its
openness, but repelled by its insalubrity, the benevolent enterprise of
the Fathers of -the Church Missionary Society.
" Contrast, with these recollections, the present openness of the whole
world to Missionary euteriirise — the easiness of access — the frequency of
communication— India not only welcoming the arrival of Missionaries,
but reproaching our slackness in not sending more. The fragrance of
the first-fruits gathered on her soil, and already waved as a wave-
offering before the Lord, invites us to reap the abundant harvest. New
Zealand has been won by Missionaries to the Crown of England and to
the visible Church of Christ. The West Indies, having anticipated tlieir
Jubilee, permit us to withdraw our forces to conquer new countries.
From all parts of the world invitations arrive, which the Society is
compelled to decline."
and ofthe The Statement itself reviews the fields of labour one by one.
In Sierra Leone, the work for the rescued slaves had resulted in
ten thousand souls, once degraded beyond conception, in regular
attendance on public worship. A promising Mission had been
begun in the Yoruba country ; and on the East Coast of Africa
two intrepid pioneers were discovering new territories and reducing
new languages to writing. In the Mediterranean, the Society's
efforts for the enlightenment of the Eastern Churches had not
.been successful ; but there were still three or four labourers at
Smyrna and Cairo, and a C.M.S. missionary (Gobat) had become
AngHcan Bishop at Jerusalem. In India, Tinnevelly and Krish-
nagar had yielded rich fruit ; Travancore was becoming promising ;
at Calcutta, Burdwan, Gorakpur, Benares, Agra, Meerut, Kotgur,
Bombay, Nasik, Madras, and Masulipatam, good work was going
on, though some of these stations showed disappointing results, —
as also did Ceylon. New Zealand was the brightest spot in the
circle of Missions, despite — as we have seen in previous chapters
— many grave difficulties. From New South Wales, Zululand,
Abyssinia, and the West Indies, the Society had withdrawn ; but
British Guiana was still occupied, with fair results. In Eupert's
Land (" North- West x\merica "), the work was on a small scale,
but had been much blessed. Half a dozen picked men had been
sent to China, but the Mission there was still in the earliest
preparatory stage.
That was That was all. But we who have been tracing out the history
know at what cost these results had been achieved. We have
seen also something of the "earthiness" of the "vessels" en-
The Jubilee 40 1
trusted with the Divine " treasure," and we can understand the Part V,
Committee's grateful exclamation, " Not unto us, O Lord, not J^"*^"^"
unto us, but unto Thy Name give glory, for Thy mercy and for ^P' '
Thy truth's sake."
In nothing is the immense difference between the period of the
Jubilee and the present time more strikingly manifested than in
the "literature" which was prepared for the commemoration,
compared with what would now be thought necessary. This T^j^iiee
" literature " consisted of just thirteen tracts and leaflets, of the Tracts,
plainest and (as we should now say) most old-fasliioned "tract "
type, some being in foolscap octavo and some smaller. No. 1 was
the Committee's official Circular. No. 2 was a 4-page leaflet,
written in a more popular style by H. W. Fox. No. 3 contained
seven original hymns and three original prayers : the former by
James Montgomeiy, George Pettitt of Tinnevelly, T. R. Birks
(afterwards Professor at Cambridge), and the young " Rev. E. H.
Bickerstctli " (now Bishop of Exeter) ; and the latter by Edward
Bickersteth, Haldane Stewart, and John Tucker. Of the hymns,
one, by E. H. Bickersteth, " 0 brothers, lift your voices," has
lived, and is well known in C.M.S. circles. No. 4 was a " Practical
Address to British Christians," by E. Bickersteth, which is cer-
tainly one of the most ettective missionary appeals ever written.
No. 5 was a sketch, by H. Venn, of " The Founders and the First
Five Years." No. 6 was an Address to Christian Ladies, by
E. Bickersteth ; No. 7, a " Mother's Appeal " for education for
missionaries' daughters, signed " L. W." (Mrs. D. Wilson of
Islington) ; No. 8, a leaflet with a small missionary map, by
" S. T." (Miss Sarah Tucker) ; No. 9, a " Conversation witli a
Little Boy," by George Pettitt ; '•' No. 10, an Appeal to the Clergy,
by tlie Rev. John Hambleton, of Islington. The remaining three,
not numbered, were a " Letter," by W. Jowett, on the general
progress of Missions ; a tract on the Uses of Gold and Silver, by
the Rev. W. Tait ; and a leaflet called " The Whole Jubilee Day,"
showing the hours in different longitudes corresponding to mid-day
on the Jubilee Day, and containing also a remarkable hymn by
H. W. Fox, " I hear ten thousand voices singing," which will
be found appended to this chapter.!
The Committee did not defer the actual commemoi'ation till the
Society's half-century was completed. They regarded the Jubilee
* In this " Conver-sation," the little boy is represented as saying*. "How I
wish that Queen Victoria may reign fifty years, and that I may be alive nt
her .Jubilee. I am sure I would go to church and sing praises to God with all
my heart."
t Tiiese Tracts, though they now seem to us inadequate, were quite up to
the standard of the titnc, ovon in external "got-np." I jiersoually can never
forgot the oxtreine interest wirh which I read some of them as a bo}-. There
was another tract circulated witii them, which is not in the collection, but
which gave me my first conceptions of the four cliief founders, Thomas Scott,
Charles Simeon, John ^'enn, and Josiah Pratt. — E. S.
492
The Jubilee
year as beginning directly the forty-ninth year, completing the
seven sabbatical periods of the Mosaic Law, was over. They
therefore fixed the date for the chief celebration in the middle of the
fiftieth year, on All Saints' Day, November 1st, 1848, " being a
day," said their Resolution, " which the Church of England has
dedicated to the commemoration of the ' one communion and
fellowship ' in which the members of Christ's mystical body are
knit together."
The arrangements made for the observance consisted of five
sermons and three meetings, and two breakfasts : —
(1) On Sunday, October 29th, Canon Dale, who happily was
Canon-in-Residence at the time, preached a special sermon at the
ordinary afternoon service at St. Paul's. In those days all the
services were held in the choir, which was quite cut off from the
dome and nave by a great organ screen ; and the congregations were
not large. Dome services (except for the charity children once a
year), and evening services, were quite unknown in the national
cathedral. Canon Dale's text was Phil. ii. 10, 11, " That at the
name of Jesus every knee should bow," &c. ; and from these
verses he based a very powerful and impressive sermon on behalf
of the Society — " a great national society," he called it, " engaged
in what ought to be a great national work " — as one instrument
for hastening the time when the grand promise of the text shall
be fulfilled.
(2) On the Tuesday evening, October 31st, Edward Bickersteth
preached at St. Anne's, Blackfriars, the old church in which the
earliest Anniversary Services were held. His text was Rev. xiv.
6, 7 — the angel with the everlasting Gospel ; and his sermon was
one of the great pulpit efforts of which we have so few examples
in the present day. It occupies sixty pages of the Jubilee Volume,
and must have taken as long a time to deliver as his ^Anniversary
Sermon in 1832 ;■■• and its intense earnestness will move any
reader even now. He dwelt on the Gospel as " everlasting " (1)
"in contrast with perishing empires " — a peculiarly appropriate
thought at that time ; (2) " in contrast to the pretensions of vain
philosophy " ; (3) "in its suitableness to the most urgent wants
of mankind " ; (4) "in the eternal blessings it conveys " ; (5) " in
the obligation of every Christian to diffuse it." Then he enlarged
on " its wide diffusion in the last days"; under which head he
poured out of his wealth of first-hand knowledge whole pages of
details on both the work done and the w^oi'k w'aiting to be done.
Then he expounded at length on the message announced by the
angel, "Fear God," &c. ; and finally he appealed to ministers,
rulers, heads of families, women, children, young men, to be up
and doing, — closing with these words : —
" Brethren, by all the interesting recollections which crowd around
this Jubilee ; by the memory of all who have gone before us ; by the
* See p. 261.
The Jubilee 493
fervent pra3^ers offering up in all the Churches tJn-ougli the world at this Part V.
season; by the wants of perishing millions; by the best interests of ] 841— IS.
your country, your Church, and yourselves ; by the everlasting miseries Chap. 32.
from which the Gospel saves us, and the everlasting blessedness to which
it brings us ; by the solemn and last command, the dying love, the
constant intercession, the faithful promises, the speedy return, and the
eternal glory of Immanuel ; — I beseech you, now afresh consecrate your-
selves and all you have to God your Father, your Saviour, and your
Sanctifier, in advancing the wider diffusion of the everlasting Gospel
through the world."
(3) The Jubilee Day itself was also devoted to church services ; Breakfast
but it began with a Breakfast at the Castle and Falcon, in the clstie and
room in which the Society was born on April 12th, 1799. The Falcon,
proprietor of the hotel, Mr. Woods, himself gave the breakfast ;
and the gathering was addressed by the Eev. John Fawcett, of
Carlisle, one of the few original members still surviving.
(4) At eleven o'clock, the principal sermon of all was preached Archbishop
at St. Anne's, Blackfriars, in the morning, by the Archbishop of fe"rmon'^a^t
Canterbury himself. Dr. Sumner, of course, could not compare St. Anne's
in eloquence with Dale, or in knowledge of the subject or intense
fervour with Bickersteth ; and his sermon is as short as Bicker-
steth's is long. But it is good and sound and earnest, on
Prov. xxiv. 11, 12 — "If thou forbear to deliver," &c. "I spent
an hour," wrote Bickersteth, " along with two or three friends,
with the Archbishop after his sermon, and thanked God for the
remarkable spirit of meekness and wisdom which God has given
him." '■'
(5) In the afternoon, Bishop Blomfield preached at St. other
George's, Bloomsbury. His sermon is not extant.
(6) The same evening. Archdeacon T. Deal try, of Calcutta (after-
wards Bishop of Madras), preached at Christ Church, Newgate
Street, on the "jubilee" of Lev. xxv. This sermon is excellent,
though without any pretension to exceptional power ; and the
preacher's personal experiences in India are introduced with good
effect.
(7) Of the three Meetings, the first, on the afternoon of October Valedictory
31st, was a Valedictory Dismissal of missionaries. It was thought i^nngtJ^n^*
well to include in the Jubilee functions one of the Society's
ordinary proceedings, as a kind of object-lesson. It was indeed
quite an ordinary meeting, and different from the crowded Vale-
dictory Meetings in Freemasons' Hall as far back as 1814 ; for it
was held, as had come to be a frequent practice, in the old, ugly,
inconvenient parish schoolroom of Islington, which seated at a
pinch three or four hundred people on bare un-backed forms. t
There was nothing very remarkable, moreover, in the proceedings
of the meeting. No band of University men was going to India
* Memoir, vol. ii. p. 403.
"j" This schoolroom was afterwards altered and enlarged to become the
Bishop Wilson Memorial Hall, a fairly comfortable room, since superseded by
the present handsome hall.
sermons.
4Q4
The Jubilee
Part V.
1841-48.
Chap. 32.
Breakfast
at the
College.
Young
Men's
Meeting.
or China ; no well-known hero of the field was I'eturning after
furlough ; no new and important enterprise was being inaugurated.
Of the eight new missionaries taken leave of, three bore names
which in after years came to be held in honour in C.M.S. circles,
viz., David Hinderer, James Erhardt, and Julia Sass. All three
went to Africa (Erhardt afterwards to India) ; and their periods of
service proved to be respectively 28, 42, and 21 years. But there
was nothing remarkable about them then. There was also a young
African named T. B. Macaulay, who had been an Islington student,
and who afterwards married Bishop Crowther's daughter, and
became Principal of Lagos Grammar School. The Instructions
delivered, and the Valedictory Address by Mr. Jowett, are printed
in the Jubilee Volume.
(8) The great Jubilee Meeting itself was held in Exeter Hall on
Thursday, November 2nd, the day following the Jubilee Day. Of
this more directly.
(9) On the Friday morning, there was a Breakfast at the
College for old and present students, at which Mr. Childe and
Mr. Venn spoke, and William Smith of Benares, to represent the
missionaries trained in the College.
(10) In the evening of the same day, there was a meeting, in
Freemasons' Hall, of what was then called the Church of England
Young Men's Society for Aiding Missions at Home and Abroad ;
of this meeting the only record is that many young men w^ere
present. But the rank and file of men and women in London
were then almost untouched ; and evening meetings were unusual.
The Young Men's Society that arranged this one might perhaps
have become a power in after years if it had retained its distinctive
title and definite purpose ; but in 1857 it dropped the " Aiding
Missions," and subsequently it was distanced in the race of use-
fulness by the Young Men's Christian Association.
The great
Jubilee
Meeting.
Lord
Chiches-
ter's
speech.
The Jubilee Meeting calls for fuller notice. The great Hall was
of course filled ; and the President was supported on the platform
by several of the Vice-Presidents and other hifluential friends.
One of the original members of the Society in 1799 was present,
and, as far as w^as known, only one — the Rev. John Fawcett of
Carlisle, who had spoken at the Breakfast on the previous day.
The " Old Hundredtli " was sung ; after which John Tucker offered
the familiar C.M.S. prayer, wath additions for the occasion, and
read Ps. Ixxii. Lord Chichester then spoke from the chair,
humbl}^, quietly, and wdth deep spirituality, as always : —
" This Jubilee of ours is indeed a happy season for those to whom
God has given a capacity for snch enjoyments — for those who know the
blessedness of pardon and redemption — who know enough of the love
of Clirist to rejoice in His work, and to long for a fuller manifestation
of His glory. Many thousands of souls thus blessed were yesterday
engaged in the work of prayer and praise — praying for the same bless-
ings, praising God for the same mercies. The sun of yesterday, in his
The Jubilee 4Q5
circuit througli tlie heavens, dawned on many a band of liappj' converts Part V.
thus engaged — bright spots in the midst of Pagan darkness, hke distant lS-l-1-48.
and scattered watch-iires in a starless night. May we not su[)pose, my Cliap. 32.
friends, tliat those beloved brethren, the fruits of our poor iniworthy
labours, were engaged in praying to God for us, as we were praying for Jhinfngon
them ; that they were praising God on our behalf, as we were praising bands of
Him on theirs "r' We may depend upon it that such prayers and pra ses ^°y^^''*he
are heard in heaven ; that such songs from ransomed sinners, wafted by world.
the intercession of our Immanuel, ascend unto the ears of the Lord of
Sabaoth. But, alas ! my friends, this world below has as yet no ear for
such music. There is nothing, I think, in God's creation that afibrds
such a melanclK)ly subject for our thoughts as that mass of darkness
and sin which still covers this miserable world. For eighteen hiuidred
years the heralds of Christ have been prc^claiming His message and His
Kingdom. For eighteen hundred years the King Himself, our great
High Priest, has been pleading before His Father's throne. But as yet
the world in general is alike deaf to His message, and dead to His love.
This is indeed an oi:^pressing thought ; sad enough to crush our hopes
and our energies, if we did not remember the name of Him who is
called ' Wonderful, Counsellor, the Mighty God, the Everlasting Father,
the Prince of Peace ' ; that the govenmient of this apparent chaos is
committed to His shoulders ; and that, by His Word, by His Spirit, by
His judgments, and at last by His coming, He will at length subdue
every enemy, and restore peace, and light, and joy to this restless and
wicked world."
An abstract of the Jubilee Statement was then read, not by
Henry Venn (whose voice never enabled him to read his own
Eeports), but by C. P. Childe, Principal of the College. The first
Eesolution was moved by Sir Eobert Harry Inghs, M.P. for Oxford sir r. h.
University. He w^as a fine specimen of the old English gentleinan, spfech^
a strong Churchman and Tory, a familiar figure in the House of
Commons, a man of wide culture, and a very warm friend of the
Society, who had several times spoken at the Anniversaries." There
w^as one very felicitous passage in his hearty speech. Eeferring
to the fact that the previous day, the Jubilee Day proper, was
All Saints' Day, he reminded the meeting that that day, the day
then present, was, in the Eoman Calendar, All Souls' Day, when aii Souis'
the dead are specially prayed for. "We enter not," said he, ^^ '
" into Eome's worship ; we have nothing to do with her doctrines ;
but let us never forget that in immediate juxtaposition with the
Feast of All Saints is the Feast of All Souls ; and though we dare
not pray for the souls of the dead, we may — icc must — pray ^and
labour for the souls of all living.'" This first Eesolution was
seconded by Mr. J. M. Strachan, the much-respected member of
Committee who had been treasurer of the Society at Madras.
Then arose the Bishop of Oxford to move the second Eesolu- f '^"{^j^g^
tion. It was a courageous thing on the part of the Society to force's
invite Samuel Wilberforce. By this time he was identified in sp«^<=h.
the minds of all men, not indeed with the Tractarians, but with
* A cliarming sketch of Sir R. H. Inglis is given by J. C. Colquhouii in his
graphic book, WiUiam Wilberforce and his Friends. But Inglis belonged to a
rather voungcr geiieratioii.
496
The Jubilee
Part Y.
1841-i8.
Chap. 32.
The
humble
room fifty
years be-
fore.
The men
and the
period.
that more advanced section of the High Church Party which
looked npon them with favour ; and his frequent speeches in
behalf of S.P.G. were not always without invidious comparisons
with C.M.S.* But the Committee well knew his old love for the
Society; and to him they committed the task of making the
great speech of the day. And a great speech it was. The hall
rang with applause, as one eloquent sentence poured forth after
another, and especially when he referred to his father's work in
the abolition of the slave-trade, and to " that saint of God, John
Wesley." A sentence or two may be quoted : —
" When I fix my mind on the humble room in which, fifty years ago,
were gathered together that little company of overworked parish priests,
labouring together day and night in their holy vocation, in the midst
of the almost overwhehiiing multitude of the world of this metropolis,
and call to mind Avliat glorious thoughts were then struggling in their
souls — what mighty impulses God's Spirit was working in their hearts —
as I look back to that scene, I feel humbled with admiration and
wonder at the means then used for producing these great results. I
hardly know of any period since the time when the whole Church of
Christ was gathered together in that upper chamber, with the door shut
upon them for fear of the Jews, when mightier issues were struggling in
fewer minds. It was purely and entirely a work of faith. They under-
took that work, not as shallow and capricious men often undertake
benevolent beginnings, to lay theni aside at the first blast of a strong
opposition, but gravely and thoughtfully, as men who knew that it was a
great thing to labour for God, and a mighty trust to begin anything in
furtherance of His Kingdom. They saw the Church slumbering in the
midst of the world, and, all unlikely as it seemed to them that they could
arouse its slumbering heart, they said, ' Nevertheless, if God be willing,
we will go forth in this undertaking.'
" Many were the difficulties that arose in their onward path. There
was first the difficulty which always waits on any mighty work of God —
the certain oj^position to it always stirred up by the great enemy of Christ
and man, and exhibited in the hatred — in the direct opposition — in the
mocking scorn, and often in the cold and pretended sympathy — of the
world around them. But this was not their only difficulty. There was
still a greater difficulty to be met and overcome. Not only were they
met by the opposition of the world, but by the utter coldness and a2">athy
of the Church herself. The beginning of this work was in what was
perhaps the darkest and coldest time in the whole history of the Church
of England — a period of coldness and of darkness of which we in these
days, and with our knowledge of what now exists, can hardly have a con-
ception, without going patiently back and inquiring into the events and
circumstances of that time, and comparing the principles of action in
every single department of Christian work, Christian labour, and Christian
self-denial then current, with those which are now admitted and acted
upon by all men. They lived at the close of a period when the Church
was so apathetic, that not only had she done nothing towards her great
work of evangelizing the Heathen, but allowed her influence at home to
wither and decay in her hand, leaving our own increasing population
to grow up in heathenism, and only showed her semi-vitality, or rather
her anti-vitality, by casting out from her bosom that great and good man
• — that saint of God — John Wesley.
* See p. 401.
The Jubilee 497
" It was at the close of sucli a period as this, when all was darkness Part V.
around them, that God put these thoughts into the hearts of these men. 1841^8.
They knew that God's Word remains sure, and they determined to act Chap. 32.
upon it ; and so the blessing which waits always upon faithful en-
deavours was vouchsafed unto them — not given at once, not given without Jiessino-
days of waiting, without nights of prayer, without self-denial, without given. °
the frown of the world, without ' fightings without,' without ' fears
within '; but given in God's time, given surely, given abundantly. Surely
we may thank God heartily that He gave them the zeal, that He gave
them the wisdom, that He gave them the ability, to lay these foundations,
upon which others since have built ; tliat He suffered them in that day
to freight their vessel with His triith ; that He allowed them, in the
daring of true faith, to set it upon the tides of His mysterious provi-
dence, leaving to Him to guide its course, leaving to Him to accomplish
its adventure."
Then came John Cunningham of Harrow, the most frequent John cun-
and trusted speaker at C.M.S. meetings, as we have before seen, speech.'" ^
His part was to set forth once more the great principles of the
Society, which he did with perfect plainness, as regards both its
mingling of the lay with the clerical element in the Executive,
and the Gospel which its founders designed the Society to
proclaim. On the latter point : —
" Led, as we cannot doubt, by the Spirit of God, to discern the desti-
tute and perishing condition of the heathen world — without a God, a
Saviour, or a Bible — they set to work to find the appropriate remedy
for this large amount of moral disease and physical wretchedness.
There could be but one — the Gospel of a Crucified Saviour. And they
not only adduced this remedy, but they resolved to administer it in its
utmost simplicity and purity. They resolved to follow the example of
the first Fathers on the English Reformation ; and were not satisfied to
give to the Heathen a mere system of Christian ethics — a set of well-
constructed ordinances — but they sought out the great fundamental
truths of the religion of the Cross — the election of grace — original cor-
ruption— justification through faith — regeneration, conversion, sanctifica-
tion, by the Spirit of God — good works as the fruit of sound faith — and
they resolved knowingly to send out no one missionary who should not
carry to the war with idolatry these truths written with the blood of a
Saviour, and, if I may so speak, verified and sanctified by their all-
powei'ful influence, wherever honestly promulgated by the messengers of
religion. The ' first Fathers ' of our Institution believed, with Bishop
Wilson, that ' a Christless missionary is no missionary at all.' "
The third Eesolution approved of a Letter being sent from the Letter to
Meeting to " the much-loved brethren in the Lord Jesus Christ, chrisUans.
gathered out from among the Heathen and Mohammedans in
Africa, Asia, &c." Archdeacon Dealtry, of Calcutta, whose
sermon we have already noticed, moved this, and George Pettitt,
of Tinnevelly, seconded it, representing respectively the numerous
Native Christians of North and South India. Both their speeches
were full of encouraging facts.
Then, to move the last Eesolution, arose Edward Bickersteth. Bicker-
Seizing the platform-rail with both hands, he burst forth in burster
accents of holy and ecstatic joy which none who heard him ^oiyjoy,
VOL. I. K k
498 The Jubilee
Part V. that day could ever forget, — " Glory be to God, our Heavenly
1841-48. Father, for the scenes which He has permitted us to witness
Chap. 32. ^i^^yij^^g ^}-,Q ig^gi; fg-^y ^ays ! " Thc speech, if read now, seems
fragmentary and lacking in point ; but in fact Bickersteth was
overcome by his emotions, and it was the spirit rather than the
matter of what he said that was remembered by his hearers.'"^'
E. Hoare's The last spcech was a maiden one at a great C.M.S. meeting,
spTe"h. by a clergyman who, at the age of thirty-six, was still young for
the honour of taking part on such an occasion. This was Edward
Hoare, then Incumbent of Christ Church, Eamsgate, and afterwards
the revered Canon Hoare of Tunbridge Wells. His closing
sentences are perhaps the most interesting to us now, at the close
of another half-century, and therefore the most worth quoting, of
any that were spoken that day : —
" And now, after the thankful retrospect of the past, it may be well,
before we part, to look forward for a few moments to the future, and to
consider what will be the state of things should this Society ever witness
The next another Jubilee. What changes will have taken place ere then ! There
Jubilee ! ^^j^j have been a vast change in our Missions. By that time, possibly.
Dr. Krapf's grand idea may be realized, and the little Mission of
Eastern Africa be enlarged till it meet in the interior the widely-
spreading Churches from the West. And what will be the state of
things at home ? Where will be England's throne ? May it stand fast
through God's blessing, and may all remember that its one secvirity is
in the truth of God ! Who will then be Archbishop ? May the Lord
grant that he may be like-minded with him whose appointment to that
high office now fills our hearts with joy ! And the Meeting — who will
be there ? Few, if any, of those who are present now will be privileged
to be there. The speakers of to-day will all be passed away. Some of
those dear children just mentioned by Mr. Bickersteth may be here to
take his place, but the voice of the beloved father must be silenced.
And what is the conclusion ? That we all remember that time is short.
We must be like the drops of the rainbow, each in himself a mere drop,
and each falling, but each reflecting the Lord's light in the brief moment
of our rapid fall, so that the whole combined should form the bow
between earth and heaven, the standing testimony to the covenant of
God.
But will " But will the world ever see another Jubilee ? And may we not
there be venture to hope that ere another fifty years be passed we shall have
reached the Jubilee of Jubilees, and been permitted to witness the
glorious advent of the Lord of Glory ? I know we should speak trem-
blingly on such a subject; but our Lord has said, 'When these begin to
come to pass, then look up, for your redemption draweth nigh.' We
are not to wait, then, till we see the elaborate fulfilment of the whole
page of prophecy ; but are to look up in hope, even at the outset of the
great events of the latter days. When, therefore, we see the powers of
heaven shaken, and iipon earth distress of nations with perplexity ;
when, at the same time, we see the missionary spirit rising in the Church
like the streak of early dawn preparing the way for the rising of the sun, —
we venture to hope that we may regard these things as the harbingers
* Bickersteth wrote to a friend, "I never spent such a remarkable four
days as the Jubilee days in London. It was really heaven upon earth."
Memoir, vol. ii. p. 403.
The Jubilee 499
of glory, as a token that the day is not far distant when the kingdoms Par
of the world shall become the kingdoms of the Lord and of His Christ. 18-i]
And what a day of jubilee will be then ! Now we meet the citizens of Chaj
one city, though uniting in a sympathy of praise with the people of God —
in almost all the nations under heaven ; but then shall be gathered
together into one, all things in Christ. Now we meet, the men of one
generation, to commemorate fathers that are departed, and to hand on
their work to children that are to come ; but then shall be assembled the
whole company of God's elect, of every land and every age. Now the
sun, pursuing its course, has gathered up the praises of successive lands ;
but then all shall be united in one glorious anthem in the actual presence
of the Sun of Righteousness. May God grant to us and to our children
that we may then ' be found in Him, not having our own righteousness,
which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the
righteousness which is of God by faith ! ' "
No words could more fitly have wound up such a Meeting as
this ; and none could more surely have led the assembly to rise,
as they did, in the spirit of humble praise, and sing the grand and
ever-welcome hymn which has so often filled the great hall with The c
solemn and yet joyful strains — "All hail the power of Jesus''"^''-
Name ! " '''
It was not only by the Committee officially that the Jubilee was
observed. Many special sermons were preached, and meetings
held, which were locally arranged, in various parts of London and
the Provinces. The Archbishop of York both preached and The
presided at a meeting, in that city. The Bishop of Chester did the in the
same, in his city, the Cathedral and the Assembly Eooms being P''°vi
both "crowded to excess." The Bishops of Hereford, Norwich,
Eipon, Salisbury, and Winchester, the Archbishop of Dublin, and
the Bishop of Derry, all either preached, or presided, or both.
Bishop Wilberforce preached at St. Mary's at Oxford, whence John
Henry Newman had so recently retired ; and also took the chair
at a crowded meeting in the Town Hall. At Cambridge, some
four hundred persons, a large proportion of them undergraduates,
attended what the Jubilee Volume, using language not so common
then as now, calls " an early celebration of the Holy Communion,"
at Trinity Church, the scene once of Charles Simeon's ministry.
Bath, Birmingham, Brighton, and Bristol were conspicuous for
their enthusiasm. One of the most interesting functions was a
sermon preached in Eugljy School Chapel, by the Head Master,
Dr. A. C. Tait; but its special interest arose from another cir-
cumstance, to be mentioned presently.
Still more interesting was the commemoration of the Jubilee in The
the Mission-field. At several of the villages in the Colony of in the
Sierra Leone, services and meetings were held ; and also at ^1^^"
* I cannot refrain from mentioning the fact of my own presence, as a boy
of twelve, at this Jubilee Meeting. My recollection of it is vivid ; par-
ticularly of Sir R. Inglis's reference to All Souls' Day, Bishop Wilberforce's
to John Wesley, and E. Bickersteth's opening words of joyous thankful-
ness.— E. S,
K k 2
500
The Jubilee
At Sierra
Leone.
Part V. Abeokuta. In India, there were various gatherings at Calcutta,
1841-48. a_t four centres in the Krishnagar district, at Benares, Agra,
Chap. 32. gjjj-^^g^^ Karachi, Bombay, Malegam, Poona, Madras, Masulipatam,
and many stations in Tinnevelly and Travancore. In Ceylon, at
Cotta, Kandy, and Jaffna ; in China, at Shanghai ; in Jamaica and
British Guiana ; at Smyrna and Jerusalem ; in New Zealand,
at Auckland, where the announcement of the Jubilee was only
received from England twenty-four hours before the day appointed,
and where Bishop Selwyn composed a special prayer for the occa-
sion ; and at Eed Eiver, in North- West America, though, on the
very day, "the winter set in furiously." Moreover, the day was
sympathetically observed by Continental Protestants at Amsterdam
and Basle ; by the Basle Mission in Western India ; at sea, by a
band of missionaries on board ship ; and on the banks of the
Indus, by a number of devout British soldiers on their march to
the seat of war in the Punjab.
Two specimens of the observances may be given, one from West
Africa and one from Tinnevelly. From Freetown the Eev. J.
Beale wrote : — ■
" The 1st of November was observed much as a Sabbath. Few of the
people came to market from the villages, and very little business was
done here. At seven o'clock a.m. we had a prayer-meeting, when the
whole congregation were present, attired in their best clothes. I com-
menced by giving out the Rev. E. H. Bickersteth's hymn, —
" Lord Jesns, unto Whom is given
All power on earth, all power in heaven ";
which was sung with the deepest feeling by the whole assembly. We
then united in prayer and thanksgiving ; the latter was the most hearty
and deep-felt. Such prayers and thanksgivings I have scarcely ever, if
ever, witnessed.
" At the Grammar School, also, the day was commenced by suitable
prayers, and by reading portions of Scripture adapted to the occasion.
At ten o'clock the pupils marched, three deep, with banners, from Regent
Square to the Mission Church, Freetown. Here the Rev. T. Peyton
preached an excellent sermon, from Isaiah Ixii. 1, to a very large
congregation. The Acting-Governor and the other Europeans were
present.
" In the evening his Honour the Chief Justice presided over a full
and overflowing meeting, which was one of the most orderly ever
witnessed within any church.
" I do believe the Jubilee will be the means of bringing down from
heaven a larger blessing than we have hitherto received."
And the Eev. John Devasagayam thus wrote from Kadatcha-
puram : —
**We celebrated our Jubilee on the 1st, with, we trust, a prayerful
and a thankful spirit. The school-children commenced the day at 3 a.m.
with singing praises to the Lord in the Jubilee hymns. The people
assembled in very good time, and were in number more than 1200. For
their accommodation we had erected a temporary shed. I commenced
the [regular Divine service a little before eleven o'clock. I preached
from adverse in the Second Lesson, Heb. xii. 2, 'Looking unto Jesus.'
At John
Devasa-
gayam's
Christian
village.
The Jubilee ^o\
I gave a short account of the Society's commencement, their sevei'al Part V.
Missions, and their present prosperity in Tinnevelly and other parts of 18-il^l8.
the workl. I told my people, also, how the children of God, in England Chap. 32.
and in India, contributed to our Society, and how it was our duty to
come before the Lord this day with thanksgiving and prayer and
oft'erings. While I offered, before the General Thanksgiving, the
valuable prayer provided us by dear Mr, Tucker, and the people re-
peated it after me, we longed that our hearts might bo truly united in
its spirit.
" At five o'clock the infant-school children went around the street,
singing the Jubilee hymns, and the people were much delighted and
gave them presents, which thej' brought again for the Jubilee Fund.
We had also regular evening service.
" It pleased the Lord, on the evening of the Jubilee Day, to call A death on
Daniel, our schoolmaster at Neijayapoorani, to the heavenly Jubilee, by day. '
cholera. When I visited him, after evening prayers, he could only
answer my inquiries by asking me to pray for him. A short time after
this he left us for his heavenly rest. He was a truly devoted Christian,
and has been, out of love, administering, during the last month, cholera
medicine to fifty people, without fearing for himself."
There was one event of the Jubilee season which, hke the death
from cholera mentioned in this last extract, reminded the Society's
circle of what John Dcvasagayam called " the heavenly Jubilee."
Henry Watson Fox died a fortnight before the day. He had lost Another
his wife at Madras, and one child at sea, in 1845 ; he had brought h.^w.'fox.
the other two children to England, spoken at the Annvial Meeting
of 1846, and returned to India ; but after another year's work, his
health had quite failed, and he reached home again in April, 1848.
He was then appointed Assistant Secretary, John Tucker being at
the same time appointed Secretary to work alongside Venn. Fox
began his duties with gladness and enthusiasm, and entered with
especial zeal into the preparations for the Jubilee ; and it was
now that he wrote the hymn already referred to. But he was
not permitted to share in the commemoration. He entered into
rest on October 14th. Forty-seven years after, his son, Henry
Elliott Fox, became Honorary Secretary of the Society.
It was in connexion with Fox's death that Dr. Tait preached Tait's ser-
that sermon in Eugby School Chapel on the Jubilee day ; and ever Rugby,
since then, it has been the custom for a sermon to be preached in
the Chapel on All Saints' Day, with a collection in aid of a fund,
started at that time by the Eev. F. Gell (now Bishop of Madras),
for maintaining a " Eugby-Fox Master" in Eobert Noble's The
College at Masulipatam. Many leading men have preached that pof Fund,
sermon : among them Benson and Temple (afterwards Arch-
bishops of Canterbury), Goulburn (afterwards Dean of Norwich),
Claughton (afterwards Bishop of St. Alban's), French (afterwards
Bishop of Lahore), Eoyston (afterwards Bishop of Mauritius),
Hodges (now Bishop of Travancore and Cochin), Percival (now
Bishop of Hereford), Bishop Jaync of Chester, Bishop Parry of
Dover, &c. Among the missionaries who have held the post of
Eugby-Fox Master have been John Sharp (now Secretary of the
502 The Jubilee
Part V. Bible Society) and A. W. Poole (afterwards first English Bishop
1841-48. in Japan). About £350 a year is still raised for the Fund, to
Chap. 32. ^hich, since 1850, no less than £13,675 has been contributed. •
The It remains to notice the Special Jubilee Fund. The Committee
FundT invited thank-offerings for four definite objects, viz., (1) the
augmentation of the Disabled Missionaries' Fund ; (2) a Fund to
provide a Boarding School for missionaries' children ; (3) a Fund
to assist infant Native Churches to raise endowments ; (4) a Fund
for mission buildings. All these would relieve the General Fund,
and enable it to be used more entirely in direct evangelistic work.
The total amount specially contributed was £55,322 lis. Id.,
up to June 30th, 1850. A few small sums were added in the next
year or two ; and the accruing interest exceeded £2000. The
List of Contributions occupies sixty four-column pages, similar to
the familiar pages in the Annual Eeport. They came from all
parts of the country, and indeed of the world, in large and small
sums. Bristol sent £1625 ; York, £1318 ; Birmingham, £1141 ;
Bath, £863; Liverpool, £766; Manchester, £717; Hull, £663.
In London, £7500 was raised, of which Islington gave £1490, and
Clapham £679. Among individual churches, St. John's, Bedford
Eow, stands for £484, and St. George's, Bloomsbury, for £425.
These figures, of course, do not include the donations and collec-
tions sent direct to Salisbury Square, which amounted to £11,300.
There were two gifts of £1000 each, and three of £500 each. No
less than £2647 was remitted from the mission-field, of which
£1900 was from India. The Sierra Leone congregations sent
£164. The missionaries in New Zealand sent as their personal
contribution £101. But of all the benefactions, the one which
The most gratified the Society was £100 from the Queen and Prince
Queen's Albert, paid through the Windsor Association. It is in virtue of
tion. ' this gift that Her Majesty's name has stood ever since in the
Eeport at the head of the List of Life Governors.
Disposal of In due course the Committee apportioned the money as follows :
the Fund. _^^ ^j^g Disabled Missionaries' Fund, £20,000; to the Native
Churches Endowment Fund, £10,000 ; to the Mission Buildings
Fund, £17,000. The remainder, after payment of about £2000
for expenses (which may be said to have been covered by the
interest), was applied towards the building of the new Children's
Home, of which we shall hear by-and-by. All proved of great
service to the Society. All was actually spent within a few years,
except the Disabled Missionaries' Fund, the principal of which
always remains intact, and now stands at £49,000, providing some
£1500 a year towards the expenses on account of disabled
missionaries and of widows and children.
Results of The financial result of the Jubilee was therefore not small.
the Jubilee. -g^|. ^^ indirect results were greater. The Society took a position
before the whole Church which it had never attained before. The
general interest in Missions was undoubtedly widened and
The Jubilee 503
deepened. New friends and supporters were secured. Children Part V.
received impressions into their young hearts which fifty more years 1841-48.
have not effaced. God answered the prayers of His people, and ^^^P- ^^•
poured out a blessing which has lasted to this day.
H. W. Fox's Jubilee Hymn.
I hear ten thousand voices singing
Their praises to the Lord on higli ;
Far distant shores and hills are ringing
With anthems of their nations' joy —
" Praise ye the Lord ! for Ho has given
To lands in darkness hid His light ;
As morning rays light up the heaven,
His Word has chased away our night."
On China's shores I hear His praises
From lips that once kissed idol stones ;
Soon as His banner He upraises,
The Spirit moves the breathless bones —
" Speed, speed Thy Word o'er land and ocean ;
The Lord in triumph has gone forth :
The nations hear with strange emotion.
From East to West, from South to North."
The song has sounded o'er the waters,
And India's plains re-echo joy ;
Beneath the moon sit India's daughters,
Soft singing, as the wheel they ply —
" Thanks to Thee, Lord ! for hopes of glory,
For peace on earth to us revealed ;
Our cherished idols fell before Thee,
Thy Spirit has our pardon sealed."
On Afric's sunny shore glad voices
Wake up the morn of Jubilee :
The Negro, once a slave, rejoices.
Who's freed by Christ is doubly free—
"Sing, brothers, sing! yet many a nation
Shall hear the voice of God and live :
E'en we are heralds of salvation ;
The Word He gave we'll freely give."
The sun on Essequibo's river
Shines bright midst pendant woods and ilowers ;
And He who came man to deliver
Is worshipped in those leafy bowers—
" O Lord ! once wo by Satan captured,
Were slaves of sin and misery ;
But now by Tliy sweet love enraptured
We sing our song of Jubilee."
Fair are New Zealand's wooded mountains,
Deep glens, blue lakes, and dizzy steeps ;
But sweeter than the murmuring fountains
Rises the song from holy lips —
" By blood did Jesus come to save us,
So deeply stained with brother's blood ;
Our hearts we'll give to Him who gave us
Deliverance from the fiery flood,"
504 The Jubilee
Part V. O'er prairies wild the song is spreading,
1841-48. Where once the war-cry sounded loud ;
Chap. 32, But now the evening sun is shedding
His rays upon a praying crowd —
"Lord of all worlds, Eternal Spirit !
Thy light upon our darkness shed ;
For Thy dear love, for Jesu's merit,
From joyful hearts be worship paid."
Hark ! hark ! a louder sound is booming
O'er heaven and earth, o'er land and sea ;
The angel's trump proclaims His coming,
Our day of endless Jubilee —
"Hail to Thee, Lord ! Thy people praise Thee,
In every land Thy Name we sing ;
On heaven's eternal throne upraise Thee ;
Take Thou Thy power, Thou glorious King." Amen.
END OF VOL. I.
BILBKKT AND KIVINGTON, LD,, ST. JOHN'S HOUSE, CLERKENWELL, E.C.
Princeton Theological Semmary-Speer Lit
1 1012 01085 4190
DATE DUE
H1GHS^A1TH #45230
'"f^,i,.>.
'lr^