<>?:>'./:-
>:•
-i^V ■
7^
li
R8Z
A History of Congregational Independency
in Scotland
PUBLISHED BY
JAMES MACLKHOSE AND SONS, GLASGOW
gublisUcrB to the anibeteitu.
MACMILLAN AND CO., LONDON AND NEW yORbC
Lonaon, • • • Shn/>kni, Hamtlion and Co,
Cambridge, - - Maciniiian and Bowes.
Edinburih, • ■ Douglas and Foulis.
I APR 22 1949 ^
A History of >%^/c^L6tM^
Congregational Independency
In Scotland
By James Ross
Minister of the Congregational Church,
Eglinton Street, Glasgow
Glasgow
James MacLehose & Sons
Publishers to the University
1900
GLASGOW : PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS
BY ROBERT MACLEHOSE AND CO.
PREFACE.
Fifty-two years ago, on the occasion of the jubilee of
the origin of the Congregational Churches in 1798, a
proposal was made that a history should be prepared,
but although some materials were gathered for this pur-
pose by the late Mr. R Kinniburgh of Edinburgh, no
steps appear to have been taken with a view to publica-
tion. It seemed iitting that the centenary of the origin of
later Independency in Scotland should be signalised by an
attempt to carry out the proposal of the fathers of half a
century ago, and also to meet the desire which has often
been expressed for a historical account of the Independent
churches in Scotland down to the present time ; and it is
with this object that the present work has been undertaken.
It will be found to consist mainly of a history of origins, and
that most of the record here given deals with the various
forms of Christian enterprise on the part of the churches in
their beginnings. It could not well be otherwise, for in the
absence of those ecclesiastical organisations which belong to
other religious bodies, and which make their history more or
less eventful, it is only in connection with some new depar-
tures in thought and activity that Congregational church-life
affords materials for historical record.
In view of the fact that the designation " Congregational "
or " Independent " can be consistently claimed by many
religious communities which practise Congregational polity,
but which are better known under other designations, the
vi PREFACE
scope of this work has necessarily been limited. To include
in a history of Congregational Independency an account of
such communities as the Baptist churches, the Society of
Friends, the various meetings of Plymouth Brethren and
others, on the ground that they all adhere more or less to
the principles of Congregational polity, would be misleading,
seeing they prefer to be known by designations which they
regard as more distinctive of their principles and aims than
their Congregationalism. The account here given is there-
fore confined to those churches which have been known as
Congregational or Independent, and which have given
prominence to that designation throughout their history. I
have further to explain that although, as a matter of fact,
most of the Independent churches in Scotland are connected
with the Congregational Union of Scotland, this history is
not meant to be confined to them, but is intended to include
all professedly Congregational Churches, so far as I have
been able to obtain any information regarding them.
The account given of the churches that came into exist-
ence towards the end of the eighteenth century is more full
than that given of the Evangelical Union churches of a later
date. A very full " History of the Evangelical Union,"
by the late Dr. Fergus Ferguson, having appeared some
years ago, I have not thought it necessary to go over at
length the ground covered by that work. At the same
time, in the chapters devoted to an account of the
Evangelical Union and Theological Hall, and to notes on
the " Origin of Churches," such information has been
given as may supplement Dr. Ferguson's history by a record
of facts and events in connection with the churches of
the Evangelical Union up to the present date.
In the compilation of a work such as the present an
author has to avail himself of many sources of help. I have
given references to many of the books and pamphlets I have
consulted, but the main sources of my information have been
the biographies of the brothers Haldane, the Eev. Dr. Ward-
law, and Kev. Messrs. Greville Ewing and John Watson, and
the manuscripts of the late Mr. E. Kinniburgh, which have
PREFACE vii
been kindly placed at my service by the committee of the
Congregational Union of Scotland, besides the various periodi-
cals issued by the churches throughout their history. In
order to avoid crowding the pages with too many references
to books, I have noted only those likely to be accessible to
readers who may wish to consult them, but I have got help
from many volumes the bare naming of which would occupy
much space. I have specially to thank Dr. Adamson and
Dr. Craig for their account of the Evangelical Union and
Theological Hall ; and to the former I am also indebted for
much of the information given regarding the periodicals of
the Evangelical Union churches, and other valuable aid. To
those pastors and secretaries who responded to my applica-
tion for information regarding their churches, and to all
other friends who have so willingly aided me in various
ways, I beg to record my hearty thanks.
The first four chapters are reprinted from papers which I
contributed to The Scottish Congregationalist some years ago.
JAMES ROSS.
Glasgow, December, 1900.
CONTENTS.
PART I.
EARLY INDEPENDENCY IN SCOTLAND.
CHAPTER I.
INDEPENDENCY AND THE SCOTTISH REFORMERS.
The political and religious character of the Scottish Reformation — The
principle of Congregational Independency indicated in the " Scots
Confession" of 1560 and the "First Book of Discipline" of 1561 —
The difference between Independents and the Scottish Reformers as
to the membei'ship of the Christian Church — The changes introduced
by the "Second Book of Discipline" in 1581 — The origin of the
General Assembly and the functions and powers given to it — The
departure from the Independency of the early Reformers by the
adoption of the "Second Book of Discipline" — Subsequent opposition
to Independency. Pp. 1-14
CHAPTER 11.
ATTITUDE OF PRESBYTERIANS TOWARDS INDEPENDENCY.
First acquaintance with English Independency by Scottish Presbyterians
— Visit of Robert Browne to Scotland in 1583, and treatment of him
by the Presbytery of Edinburgh — Visit of John Penry — Declarations
of the General Assembly against Independency in 1641 ami 1647 —
Influence of Cromwell and his soldiers — Attempt of Alexander Jaffray
and others to form an Independent church in Aberdeen in 1652, and
failure of the Scheme. Pp. 15-23
X CONTENTS
, CHAPTER III.
THE GLASITES.
The place of the " Covenants " and covenanting in connection with Scottish
Presbyterianism — John Glas's protest, and gradual adoption of Inde-
pendent principles — Separation of members of his congregation for
"fellowship" — Prosecution of Glas, and his deposition from the
ministry in 1728 — Peculiar views and practices of Glas and his
followers — Formation of churches — Robert Sandeman and his views —
Causes of the decay of the Glasite churches. Pp. 24-31
CHAPTER IV.
THE OLD SCOTS INDEPENDENTS.
Origin of several religious parties in eighteenth century, viz., the Secession
Church, the Relief Church, the Old Scots Independents, the Old
Scotch Baptists, the Bereans, and the Cameronians — "The Case of
Robert Smith and James Feri'ier," and their adoption of Independent
principles — Formation of churches — Union with Inghamite churches —
Causes of failure of Old Scots Independent churches. Pp. 32-40
PART II.
LATER INDEPENDENCY IN SCOTLAND.
CHAPTER V.
BEGINNINGS.
Origin of Independent churches — State of Religion in Scotland at close of
eighteenth century — Narrow and exclusive spirit of the various
churches — Influence of the French Revolution — Missionary enterprise
of the pioneers of later Independency — Mr. R. Haldane's foreign
missionary scheme, and its failure — Influence of the Missionary
Magazine — Formation of the Edinburgh Tract Society and Gratis
Sabbath School Society — Lay-preaching in Gilmerton, and its results
— Missionary tour through the North of Scotland by Messrs. Haldane
and Aikman — Results of their labours. Pp. 41-54
CONTENTS xi
CHAPTER VI.
PROGRESS.
Institution of the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel at Home —
Itinerancies throughout Scotland — Mr. R. Haldane's "Tabernacle"
scheme — Sells his estate at Airthrey — Messrs. Ewing and Innes leave
the Established Church — Formation of a Congregational church in
Edinburgh — Its Constitution — Proceedings in connection with the
ordination of Mr. J. A. Haldane — Opening of Tabernacles in Glasgow
and Dundee — The specific object in view in founding Tabernacles.
Pp. 55-65
CHAPTER VII.
OPPOSITION.
Acts of the General Assembly against lay-preachers and " vagrant " teachers
— "Pastoral Admonition" of the General Assembly — Proposal to put
down " unlicensed " preaching by civil enactment — Repressive attempts
by ministers and church-courts — Case of M 'Arthur r. Campbell in
Court of Session — Judgment of Lord Meadowbank — Messrs. Haldane
and Campbell threatened with imprisonment — Persecution and eviction
of tenant-farmers in the Highlands — Trials of ministers — Action of
Anti-burgher, Cameronian, and Relief Churches against lay-preaching,
etc. — Chief causes of this antagonism — Rowland Hill's criticism of
action of church-courts — Resolutions of a later time rescinding repressive
acts of General Assembly and other church-courts. Pp. 66-75
CHAPTER VIII.
CONTROVERSY AND DIVISION.
Reasons for adoption of Congregational principles by the early Congre-
gational churches in Scotland — The weekly observance of the Lord's
Supper and institution of the "weekly meeting" — Liberal views of
Greville Ewing — Origin of practice of "Mutual Exhortation," and
Mr. Ewing's views regarding it — Publication of Mr. J. A. Haldane's
"Views of Social Worship," etc. — Advocacy of the "Views," and
also of "Plurality of Elders" by Messrs. William Ballantine and R.
Haldane — Withdrawal of Mr. R. Haldane's support from churches not
adopting his views — Adoption of Baptist Views by Messrs. Haldane —
Disastrous effects of controversies on the churches — Dr. Alexander's
remarks on the divisions of the time. Pp. 76-85
xii CONTENTS
CHAPTER IX.
RESETTLEMENT.
Trials of ministers and churches resulting from withdrawal of support by
Mr. R. Haldane — Origin of Congregational Union — Original aims of
the Union — Objections to the institution of the Union — Its unde-
nominational character — Benefits to the churches from the institution
of the Union — Christian fellowship enjoyed at its meetings — Miscon-
ception of the Union by Presbyterians — Subsequent changes in its
constitution — Other agencies and societies of the churches : The
Paisley Society ; Edinburgh Itinerant Society ; Perth, Angus, and
Mearns Itinerant Association ; Northern Association of Congregational
churches ; and Glasgow Congregational Union. Pp. 86-99
CHAPTEE X.
MINISTERIAL EDUCATION.
Schemes of Mr. E. Haldane for promoting Ministerial Education — Theo-
logical Classes in Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Dundee — Mr. Ewing's
first " Memorial on Education for the Ministry" in 1804; his second
" Memorial " in 1808 — Objections to his proposals — Institution of the
Glasgow Theological Academy in 1811 — Its professors, course of study,
endowments, etc. Pp. 100-108
CHAPTER XL
DIFFICULTIES AND ENCOURAGEMENTS.
State of the churches subsequent to the formation of the Congregational
Union — Eff'ects of unfavourable situation of churches, decrease of
churches owing to former divisions, and emigration, and effect of con-
• ditions of membership — Benefits to the churches from the Theological
Academy — Congregationalists and Public Questions — The "Voluntary"
controversy, and attitude taken by Congregationalists. Pp. 109-120
CHAPTER XII.
TWO DISRUPTIONS.
Influence of Congregational churches in preparing the way for the " Dis-
ruption " of the Established Church in 1843 — Their attitude regarding
the Disruption — Its effect on them — Origin of the "New Views"
controversy among Congregational churches — Doctrinal positions of
CONTENTS xiii
Congregationalists prior to 1839 — Rev. John Kirk's teaching — Action
of committees of Glasgow Theological Academy and Congregational
Union — " Correspondence between Four Churches," etc. — Reasons for
publication of "Correspondence" — Remarks on the controversy.
Pp. 121-136
CHAPTER XIII.
EVANGELICAL UNION AND THEOLOGICAL HALL.
Sketch of Dr. James Morison's early evangelistic labours — Prosecution and
ultimate excliision of Dr. Morison from the United Secession Church —
Subsequent doctrinal position of Dr. Morison and others — Formation
of the Evangelical Union — Basis and objects of the Union — Its non-
denominational character — Institution of the Theological Hall —
Practical working of the Evangelical Union — Illustrations of its pro-
cedure : Cases of ministers of the Catholic Apostolic Church, and Rev.
James Forrest — Home Mission and Chi:rch-aid schemes — Periodicals —
Attitude and operations in connection with the Temperance movement
— Influence of Evangelical Union churches on theology and religious
life in Scotland — Theological Hall : its institution in 1843 — Early
classes — Removal of Hall to Glasgow — Professors, course of study, etc.
Pp. 137-156
CHAPTER XIV.
CARDROSS AND CRANBROOK CASES.
The Cardross case — Its relation to Congregational churches — Dr. Alexander's
statement regarding the Rev. Mr. M'Millan's claim — The Cranbrook
case — Action of Edinburgh ministers — The grounds on which they
proceeded — Result of their action. Pp. 157-163
CHAPTER XV.
INSTITUTIONS OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES AND
THEIR ORIGIN.
Societies : The Scottish Congregational Ministers' Widows' Fund — The
Scottish Congregational Ministers' Provident Fund, and Evangelical
Union Ministers' Provident Fund — The Congregational Chapel Building
Society, and Evangelical Union Chapel Debt and Building Fund —
The Conference of Scottish Congregationalists — Congregational Total
Abstinence Society, and Standing Committee of the Evangelical Union
on Temperance — Congregational Pastors' Supplementary Stipend Fund,
CONTENTS
and Evangelical Union Augmentation of Stipend Fund. Periodicals :
Missionary Magazine and its successors, the Day Star, the Christian
News, the Dew Drop, the Evangelical Repository, Forward, the
Advance, the Young Herald, the Evangelical Union Magazine.
Pp. 164-176
CHAPTER XVI.
UNION OF CONGREGATIONAL AND EVANGELICAL UNIONS.
Changed position of ministers and churches regarding former differences —
Early efforts in the direction of union — Stoppage of Conferences on the
subject — Presumptions of proposals for union — Joint meeting of the
two Unions in 1895, and delay of negotiations for one year — Second
joint meeting of the Unions in 1896, and declaration of union — Note
on procedure in connection with the union of the two bodies of churches
— Petition of Trustees of the Ferguson Bequest Fund to the Court of
Session, and Answers of the Congregational Union and minority of the
churches of the Union — Documents printed in connection with the
case — Decision of the Court. Pp. 177-195
CHAPTER XVn.
NOTES ON THE HISTORY.
Position of Congregationalists regarding church-membership — Com-
parative view of the principles of Presbyterians and Congregationalists
on the membership of the church — Charge made against Congregation-
alists of judging the spiritual condition of applicants for membership —
Actual procedure in such cases — How the misconception has arisen —
Gradual approach of Presbyterians and Congregationalists in regard
to this question. 2. Scottish Congregationalism a dissent from
Presbyterianism — Grounds of this dissent— The argument for Con-
gregationalism from Scriptural teaching and example. 3. Scottish
Congregationalism and doctrine — Doctrinal position of Independents
of last century — Calvinistic positions of later Independents in early
part of the century — Changed attitude to Calvinism in later times —
Uniform and continuous Evangelical testimony of Congregationalism.
4. Divisions among Congregationalists — Remarks on them. 5. Extinct
churches — Causes of their extinction. 6. Number of independent
churches in Scotland — Some suggested causes of hindrance to their
greater progress. 7. Influence of Congregational churches on the
religious thought and life in Scotland. 8. The future of Congre-
gationalism in Scotland. Pp. 196-214
CONTENTS XV
CHAPTER XVIII.
ORIGIN OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES IN SCOTLAND.
Pp. 215-244
CHAPTER XIX.
PASTORATES OF THE CHURCHES.
Pp. 245-255
CHAPTER XX.
LISTS OF STUDENTS OF THEOLOGICAL HALLS.
Pp. 256-271
APPENDIX.
^. Biographical Sketches of the pioneers of Congregationalism in Scotland
— Robert Haklane, James A. Haldane, John Aikman, John Campbell,
William Innes, Greville Ewing, and George Cowie. B. Testimony of
Dr. Russell regarding the state of religion in Scotland towards the
close of eighteenth century. C. Pastoral Admonition of General
Assembly of 1799. Pp. 272-282
POETKAITS.
James A. Haldane,
Greville Ewing,
Dr. Wardlaw,
Dr. Eussell,
John Watson,
Dr. Alexander,
Dr. Morison, -
R Morison,
Dr. Guthrie,
Dr. Kirk,
Dr. Ferguson,
A. M. Wilson,
PAGE
41
121
136
156
PART I.
EARLY INDEPENDENCY IN SCOTLAND.
CHAPTER I.
INDEPENDENCY AND THE SCOTTISH REFOEMERS.
Just as there were "Reformers before the Reformation," so
there were Independents and Independent Churches in
Scotland long before the close of last century, when the
churches commonly known by that name came into exist-
ence. In the hope that a brief historical sketch of this
earlier Independency may be of some interest, it is proposed
in the first few chapters of this book to show the extent to
which the principles of Congregational Independency were
recognised and practised in the Scottish Reformed Churches
from the Reformation in 1560 until the publication of the
"Second Book of Discipline" in 1581; the attitude of
Presbyterians towards it from that time to the Revolution
Settlement of 1688 ; the place it had in Scotland from
1688 until 1728, when Glas's "Testimony of the King of
Martyrs " was published ; and then to give some account
of the Independent Churches that came into existence from
that date until the closing years of last century.
The Scottish Reformation was partly a religious and
partly a political movement. On the one hand, the earnest
religious men of whom John Knox became the leader were
A
2 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
moved by a desire to overthrow Popery as a system of
religious error, and to introduce to Scotland the religion of
the " true evangel," v^hile on the other hand, the nobles vpho
afterwards became the " lords of tlie congregation " had
mainly political and personal objects in view, and were
moved by a desire to resist the encroachments of the
sovereign and of the Popish hierarchy upon the liberties
and property of the people of Scotland. The movement
that resulted in the Eeformation in Scotland was initiated
by a combination of these two parties. They found that
each was necessary to the other, or, at least, that the aims
of both would be the more speedily and successfully carried
out by a combined movement than by each acting separately.
The real force of the movement, however, was religious rather
than political, and it was on this account that Knox became
the acknowledged leader of what was in its main movements
a great uprising against the despotism of the sovereign and
the Popish priesthood, — a despotism that was felt to be as
oppressive in its secular as in its religious tyranny. Knowing
the great influence of Knox, six of the leading noblemen in
Scotland appealed to him for his advice as to what action
they should take with the view of opposing the increasing
power of the sovereign and the bishops, and by his counsel
they formed themselves in 1557 into a " band," and by a
solemn covenant bound themselves to " forsake and renounce
the congregation of Satan, with all the superstitious abomina-
tion and idolatry thereof." The covenant was renewed at
Perth in 1559, after a sermon preached by Knox, and as
this was followed immediately by open resistance to the
Queen and her Popish counsellors, it may be regarded as
the first overt movement towards accomplishing the objects
sought by the Eeformers. In all the movements that
followed, this combination of religious and political parties
had a foremost place, and gave a direction to the religious
thought and life of the Scottish people that remains to this
day. Had Knox and his co-religionists been left free to
carry out their spiritvial aims, untrammelled by political
considerations, there can be little doubt that the whole
INDEPENDENCY AND THE SCOTTISH REFORMERS 3
religious and ecclesiastical life of the Scottish people would
have been very different from what it became.
While, in order to secure the abolition of Popery and the
free preaching of the Gospel of Christ, Knox was induced to
become the leader of a political party, he strove hard to keep
the movement upon religious lines, and to take advantage
of the co-operation of the "lords" so as the more effectually
to promote the spiritual ends he had in view. How faithfully
he did this the history of the period between 1559 and
1578 bears witness. It is of special interest to Indepen-
dents, however, as showing the extent to which their dis-
tinctive principles found recognition during this the earliest
period of Protestant church-life in Scotland.
In 1560 the "Scots Confession" appeared, and was followed
in 1561 by the "First Book of Discipline," both of which
were drawn up by Knox, and set forth his views as to the
government and order of the " kirk." These symbols of the
Reformation party are remarkable for the clearness and
force with which they declare the principles for which Inde-
pendents have all along contended.
1, The independence of the several churches was declared.
The " notes of the true kirk of God " were declared to be,
" First, the true preaching of the Word of God. . . .
Secondly, the right administration of the sacraments. . .
Lastly, ecclesiastical discipline rightly ministered, as God's
Word prescribed, whereby vice is repressed and virtue
nourished. Wheresoever, then, these notes are seen, and of
any time continue (be the number never so few, above two or
three), there, without all doubt, is the true kirk of Christ,
who, according to His promise, is in the midst of them.
. . . And such like we, the inhabitants of the realm of
Scotland, professors of Christ Jesus, confess us to have in our
cities, towns, and places reformed." ^ There was no provision
made for the government of churches by Church-courts
external to the single congregation ; that arrangement did not
come into full operation until 1581, when the " Second Book
of Discipline" appeared. Each congregation was virtually
^ Scots Confession, chap, xviii.
4 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
independent, and was held to be fully competent to manage its
own affairs. That this was so, will appear all the more clearly
when we note the functions prescribed for the congregation.
2. Both the sacraments and discipline were to be ad-
ministered by " lawful ministers, whom we affirm to be only
those that are appointed to the preaching of the Word, into
whose mouth God hath put some sermon of exhortation,
they being men lawfully chosen thereto by some kirk."
Thus, not only the " calling " of a minister by the voice of
the people, but his appointment was in the hands of the
people. Knox had good cause to emphasise these functions
and duty of the congregation, for it was in virtue thereof
that he was both called and ordained to the office of the
ministry. In 1547, when his preaching had proved
acceptable to the congregation in the castle of St. Andrews,
he was earnestly urged to take the " preaching place." The
call of the people was given by John Eough, Knox's fellow-
preacher, in these memorable words : — " Brother, ye shall
not be offended albeit I speak to you that which in charge
is given me from all those here present, which is this — In
the name of God and of His Son Jesus Christ, and in the
name of those that do presently call you by my mouth, I
charge you that you do not refuse this holy vocation, but as
ye tender the glory of God, the increase of Christ's kingdom,
and the edification of your brethren, and the comfort of me,
whom ye understand well enough to be overburdened, ye take
upon you the office and public charge of preaching, even as
ye look to avoid God's heavy displeasure." Turning to the
people he said, " Was not this your charge given to me, and
do ye approve it ? " They answered, " It was, and we
do approve it." ^ Neither in the "Confession" of 1560
nor in the " First Book of Discipline " was any call or
appointment prescribed other than that which Knox himself
had received, and in virtue of which he exercised his
ministry throughout his long and useful life.
3. The freedom and function of the church to appoint its
own officers were also declared in the prescriptions for the
^ Calderwood's History, vol. i., p. 227.
INDEPENDENCY AND THE SCOTTISH REFORMERS 5
appointment of elders and deacons, who were elected annually,
so as to leave the congregation free to revise its arrangements
with regard to these officers.
4. Care was taken that the minister of each congregation
should exercise his functions, not as " lord or ruler," but in
" preaching the Word and ministering the sacraments ; so
that in consultations, judgments, and in other political affairs,
his counsel rather than authority take place. And if so be
that the congregation upon just cause agree to excommunicate,
then it belongeth to the minister, according to their general
determination, to pronounce the sentence, to the end that all
things be done orderly, and without confusion." ^ It was
prescribed that the ministers, elders, and deacons of each
congregation should meet once a week to consult together as
to the affairs of the congregation, chiefly with a view to the
exercise of discipline ; but no decision could be given in any
case, save by the voice of the congregation.
5. There was an institution in the early Scottish churches
which was in full harmony with the freedom and responsibility
claimed for each congregation, and which may possibly have
been the original of the weekly prayer meeting that has been
held in churches in Scotland in the best days of religious
life. In the "First Book of Discipline" it was appointed that
every week the congregation should " assemble to hear some
place of the Scripture orderly expounded," at which meeting
it should " be lawful for every man to speak or enquire, as
God shall move his heart, and the text minister occasion, so
that it be without pertinacity or disdain, as one that seeketh
rather to profit than to contend." It was while an exile in
Geneva, in 1556, that Knox came to know the spiritual
helpfulness of these weekly meetings, and wrote to his
brethren in Scotland urging them to hold similar meetings
for prayer and reading the Bible, after reading which, he
said, " if any brother have exhortation, interpretation, or
doubt, let him not fear to speak or move the same."^ Knox
^ First Book of Discipli7ie.
^ The Si/nagogiie, not the Temple, the Germ and Model of the Christian
Church (Rev. James Gall), p. 210.
6 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
never forgot his lively impressions of the value of these
meetings, and his w^isdom in making them a regular institu-
tion in the church, was proved by the fruits they bore. " It
was out of these little assemblies that the first ministers and
professors were drawn. In 1560, when these meetings
began, there were only twelve ordained ministers in Scotland ;
in 1567, exactly seven years after, there were not fewer than
two hundred and fifty-two ordained ministers, four hundred
and sixty-seven Bible-readers, and one hundred and fifty-six
exhorters — in all, eight hundred and seventy-three labourers
in the field, spreading abroad the doctrines of the Eeforma-
tion." ■"■ Such an arrangement as this probably could not
have existed, or have proved practically successful, but for
the free and independent life of the churches in those days.
So far, then, as the polity of the Reformation churches
in Scotland during the first few years of their history was
concerned, it was distinctly Independent and Congrega-
tional. It was Independent, inasmuch as the several
churches owned no authority external to themselves, either
civil or ecclesiastical. Whatever consultations ministers
and other church-officers might have together, they could
exercise no absolute authority, and all church action was
determined, in the last result, by the general voice of the
congregation. It was Congregational, inasmuch as in
regard to the calling and appointment of ministers and
other officers, the final exercise of discipline, and the
promoting of helpful fellowship by the mutual exhortation
of the members, all these functions belonged to each
particular church, which was held to be complete in itself
for all the purposes of church-life and order.
But, while in regard to the functions, rights, and liberties
of each congregation, and its office-bearers, the church
polity of the first few years of the Eeformation period in
Scotland was virtually that of Congregational Independency,
there was a distinctive difference between it and the
Independency that was known in England in Reformation
times, and that found a place in Scotland at a later period.
^ The Synagogue, not the Temple, etc., by Rev. J. Gall, p. 212.
INDEPENDENCY AND THE SCOTTISH REFORMERS 7
The difference consisted in the conception of the nature
of a church or " kirk " of Christ by Knox and his successors
on the one hand, and by the Independents on the other.
Knox gave the " notes of a true kirk of Christ," as three —
faithful preaching of the Word, the right ministering of
sacraments, and the exercise of ecclesiastical discipline :
" wheresoever, then, these notes are seen, there without
doubt is the true kirk of Christ," to which the " Confession "
of 1560 adds the words, " not that universal, of which
we have before spoken, but particular, such as was in
Corinth," &c. But this definition of a church simply
amounts to a declaration that where certain religious acts
are performed by and for a certain body of people, there
a church is, but affirms nothing as to the religious character
or spiritual standing of those composing the church ; in
short, the " notes " go to show that it is, but not what it
is. While the Scottish Reformers held that the performance
of the three functions mentioned afforded proof of the
existence of a " particular " church, " as at Corinth," &c.,
they would not have gone the length of affirming that
such performances justified them in regarding the members
of any such church as " sanctified in Christ, called to be
saints," as the Apostle Paul addressed the particular
church at Corinth, but only that where the three functions
were performed, there a " true kirk " ivas. Beyond this
they would not go, affirming only the fact of its existence
in virtue of certain religious acts performed, but affirming
nothing as to the character or spiritual condition of those
who were members of a " true kirk," further than that
their conduct was such as was free from " faults and
suspicions " exposing them to discipline.
Now the point at which Knox stopped short, is the
point at which the distinctive principle of Congregational
Independency comes in. Independents held that that
which constituted a " true church " was " the joining of
faithful Christians into fellowship " (to use the words of
John Cotton in his " Way of the Churches,") and " that
every true visible church is a company of people, called
8 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
and separated from the world by the "Word of God, and
joined together by voluntary profession of faith in Jesus
in the fellowship of the Gospel." ^ Whereas, according to
Knox, the church was an institution providing the means
by which men might become believers in Christ, according
to the early Independents it was this and something more ;
it was a holy fellowship of those who sincerely avowed
that they were believers : that which Knox left out, they
included as essential to the very nature of a church as
a company of professing and confessing believers in Christ.
This, indeed, has continued to be the distinctive difference
between Presbyterians and Independents from Knox's time
to the present day.
It is not difficult to understand this omission and defect
(from the point of view of Independency) on the part of
Knox. It may be traced partly to the theological views,
and partly to the political aims of the early Scottish
Eeformers. Their view of the " catholic and invisible
church " as composed of the " elect of all ages " disposed
them to shrink from requiring personal confession of faith
in Christ on the part of Church members, lest they might
appear to assume to decide upon the spiritual standing of
any individual, and to affirm whether or not he belonged
to the invisible church known to God only ; and therefore
they required only such negative evidence as might be
afforded in religious knowledge, and in the absence of
scandalous conduct. Then, further, their political aims
discouraged any attempt to found churches upon the
spiritual basis asserted by Independents. They aimed
at the reconstruction of society, and sought to make
the church and the nation identical. This could be done
only by making the conditions of good citizenship and
church membership the same, and by so conjoining the
functions of the Church and the State that all the people
might be included under one government of two branches,
the "civil" and "ecclesiastical," and having one supreme
^ Petition to James I., quoted in Baxter's Covgregationalis7n as seen in
its Literature, p. .307.
INDEPENDENCY AND THE SCOTTISH REFORMERS 9
Sovereign and Head, tlie Lord Jesus Christ. Under the
influence of this splendid, but, as many believe, misguided
ambition, the early Scottish Eeformers drifted away from
the Congregational Independency of the early years of their
history.
"The 'Second Book of Discipline ' of 1581, . . , must be
regarded as the standard of the Church of Scotland in
respect of government and discipline,"^ for during the
period of over three hundred years that has elapsed since
its publication, the Presbyterian system set forth in it has
undergone little or no change. Seeing the " First Book of
Discipline " was based on what was virtually a system of
Congregational Independency, the departure from that first
book to the pronounced Presbyterianism of the second was
large and rapid, the interval between the publication of the
two books having been only some twenty years. But much
had happened in that time.
The adoption of Presbyterianism by the reformed churches
must be traced to the rise of the functions and powers of
the General Assembly, for the system was not developed
logically and by upward gradation from the congregation to
the highest court, but conversely, from the General Assembly
downwards to the lowest Church court — the kirk-session.
" While struggling against direct persecution, or the secret
stratagems of insidious foes, the General Assembly of the
Church of Scotland rose into personal and active being, put
forth supreme and legislative powers in regard to the con-
stitution and government of the Church, sanctioned the
office of elder on the authority of the sacred scriptures,
gave existence and power to the kirk-session, appointed the
important though temporary office of superintendents and
visitors, erected provincial synods, and inflicted on offenders
of all ranks, according to the offence and its distinctive judg-
ment, the disciplinary and executive sentence of suspension,
deposition, and excommunication."" Presbyterianism may thus
be said to owe its birth in Scotland to "General Assemblyism."
^ History of Church of Scotland, by Rev. Dr. Hetherington, vol. i., p. 154.
'^Ihid., vol. i., p. 128.
10 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
And yet it does not appear that the originators of the
General Assembly contemplated any such outgrowth from
it as the whole Presbyterian system. The holding of Gene-
ral Assemblies arose from the situation in which the early
reformers found themselves. Combined action seemed forced
upon the leaders of the reformed party in order to secure the
freedom and rights of the several congregations, and this
action took the form of consultation, resolution, and petition,
and protest to Parliament on the part of the ministers and
elders of the congregations in an Assembly convened for
these purposes. At first the Assemblies were pro re nata
(to use an ecclesiastical phrase of later date), or held as
occasion arose, but the occasions and necessities became so
frequent that for a long period two Assemblies were held
yearly. At the outset there was but little that was dis-
tinctive of Presbyterianism in these gatherings, for similar
Assemblies have been held by Independents without any
departure from Independency. It was not, therefore, the
mere practice of holding such meetings of representatives of
churches that led to Presbyterianism, but the matters dis-
cussed and the action taken at them.
First of all, the General Assembly came into existence
as the result of an appeal by Protestants of various ranks
to Parliament to abolish Popery, to " restore purity of
worship and primitive discipline," and to apply the revenues
of the disestablished Piomish Church to the support of
ministers, the promotion of education, and the relief of the
poor. The petitioners were requested by the Parliament to
lay before it a summary of the " doctrine and discipline "
they wished established, and this was done in the form of
the " Confession " of 1559, which was approved by Parlia-
ment, and thereby involved the abolition of Popery and the
establishment of Protestantism. But, as the " Confession "
gave only an outline of the doctrine and discipline of the
reformed churches, the reformers found it advisable to
prepare a more detailed statement. This was the work of
what has been called the " First General Assembly," though
it had little in common with the Assemblies afterwards called
INDEPENDENCY AND THE SCOTTISH REFORMERS 11
by that official name. Its acts and resolutions as set forth
in the " First Book of Discipline " and otherwise, were
simply declarative of the religious opinions of the persons
on whose behalf they were issued, in response to the request
of Parliament for a statement of the doctrine and discipline
proposed by the reformers.
The chief action of subsequent Assemblies for several
years was confined to a combined effort on the part of
their members — ministers and elders — to obtain the
consent of Parliament to the other demands of the petition
which had been so far granted in the ratification of the
"Confession." These were mainly three: — (1) That the
revenues of the disestablished church should be applied
to the support of the ministry, education, and the poor;
(2) that while patrons of benefices should retain the
right to " present " ministers to the congregations, the
latter should have the right to accept only such as they
approved and who were found duly qualified ; and (3) that
to secure the defence of the congregational rights, and also
those of ministers against any interference by the civil
powers, the right to hold General Assemblies should be
granted by Parliament. The last years of the life of John
Knox were devoted to an unceasing and earnest effort to
enforce these claims. There can be no doubt that the
firmness and courage of Knox and his colleagues in the
Assembly in prosecuting their demands before the
sovereign and Parliament, and the conviction that they
had the sympathy of the great body of the people, had
the effect of gaining for the Assembly no small degree of
respect, and an acknowledgment of influence and power
which increased every year. It was, therefore, as an
ecclesiastico-political organisation that the Assembly first
became conscious of the power which latterly it used for
purposes other than political.
Secondly, while the prosecution of these claims largely
engaged the attention of the Assemblies, other matters
directly affecting the interests of the congregations and the
ministers came before them. Questions relating to the
12 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
exercise of discipline were submitted to them for advice,
and the advice ultimately came to be regarded as virtually
a command ; proposals as to the " planting of kirks " in
destitute places, and various other matters affecting the
aims and v^^ork of the reformed churches as a propagandist
body were referred to the Assembly, in the first instance for
consultation and conference, though ultimately the opinion
of the Assembly came to be accepted as an authoritative
judgment. Several offices and functions outside the par-
ticular congregations were the direct creation of the
Assembly, such as those of " readers," who were appointed
to read the Scriptures to the people in places where there
were no ministers ; " exhorters," whose duty it was to
exhort as well as read the Scriptures, especially at the
" weekly meeting " instituted by Knox ; and " superin-
tendents," whose duty in the first instance was to act as
missionary-ministers and preachers in certain large and
defined districts, to promote the " planting of kirks," and
the settlement of ministers, over whom they were expected
to take a general, though not authoritative, oversight. All
these officers were directly responsible to the Assembly.
Thirdly, gradually the Assembly began to assume
distinctly legislative powers. As early as 1563 the powers
of a kirk-session to decide in matters of discipline were
recognised by the Assembly, and the superintendents of
districts, along with the ministers over whom they presided,
began to exercise the powers of what became the " synod."
A few years later (1579) the "presbytery" came into
existence, for in that year the Assembly decreed that the
" exercise (or weekly meeting of ministers and elders of
contiguous congregations) might be judged a presbytery,"
and in 1581 thirteen such presbyteries were "erected."
The adoption of the " Second Book of Discipline " in
1581 was virtually the sanction given in a formal and
authoritative way to changes that had been going on in the
economy of the congregations and of the whole church-body
throughout Scotland. The offices, which were of a temporary
nature, such as reader, exhorter, and superintendent, were
INDEPENDENCY AND THE SCOTTISH REFORMERS 13
abolished ; the ministers and elders became a kirk-session,
with authority over the congregation ; the eldership of
adjoining congregations became a presbyterial court ; the
ministers and elders of districts, formerly under the charge
of superintendents, became a synodical court ; and the
General Assembly became the supreme court of the whole
body of churches. All these courts were in "subordination"
to each other, the lower to the higher, and thus was laid the
foundation of what in the Westminster Confession of Faith,
the final standard of Scottish Presbyterian churches, was set
forth as the distinctive principle of Scottish Presbyterianism,
viz., the " subordination of courts." All that remained to
the congregations of the large liberties and functions claimed
for them in the " First Book of Discipline " was the right to
signify their approval or disapproval of ministers presented
to them by patrons of " benefices," and the right of appeal
from the session to the presbytery and higher courts. The
Church-system, which had begun by making the voice of the
congregation the basis of all church action and authority
(ministers and elders being only the executive of the
congregation) had changed into a system under which all
action and authority was placed in the hands of the Church
courts, leaving to the people the right only of complaint or
appeal. " The First Book of Discipline " occupied itself
chiefly with the congregation, the " Second Book " with the
dependence of the congregation upon the higher courts.
" The general tendency henceforward, natural in a complex
society, was towards centralisation ; the rights of the congre-
gation gradually diminished, those of the presbytery
increased. This tendency was strengthened as time went
on by the passionate hatred of the Presbyterians towards
the Congregational system." ^
So complete had the rule of the official class in the
churches become, that in the year 1639 even the right of
the congregation to exercise a veto upon the appointment
of a minister was questioned and resisted, one of the leaders
of the Assembly (Principal Baillie) characterising the claim
^ Encyclopaedia Brit annica'. art. "Presbyterianism."
14 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
as " sheer Brownism,"^ as Independency was called in those
days, indicating that even this last fragment of congre-
gational rights was denied, and that the Congregationalism
of the early reformed Churches had come to be regarded as
a hateful heresy. The same tendency to clerical domina-
tion was shown a few years later (1647), when, after a
short and sharp struggle on the part of those who had not
quite fallen in with the usurpation of the rights of the
congregation that had taken place, the Assembly passed an
act forbidding the holding of the " weekly meeting " and
religious meetings of all kinds other than those presided
over by a minister, on the ground that they were to " the
prejudice of the regular ministry."^ It is worthy of note
that this last act of clerical domination took place on the
eve of the struggle between the " covenanting " party of the
Presbyterian Churches and the Stuart kings, and may serve
to show that, so far at least as the freedom of the congre-
gation was concerned, the people had little to choose
between the rule of the presbytery and that of the bishop.
The spirit shown in the attempt to prohibit the " weekly
meeting " (the favourite institution of Knox, and which,
indeed, had been the nursery of the Scottish Eeformation)
goes far to account for the readiness with which many of
the Presbyterian ministers adopted the Episcopal system
under the Stuarts, for the chief promoter of the movement
against the " weekly meeting," which resulted in its prohi-
bition by the Assembly, was Henry Guthrie,^ minister of
Stirling, who afterwards l^ecame a bishop of the Scottish
Episcopal Church in the days of Charles II.
^ Baillie's Letters, vol. i., p. 241.
^ Records of the Kirk of Scotland, p. 473.
^Ihid., p. 285.
CHAPTER II.
ATTITUDE OF PRESBYTERIANS TOWARDS
INDEPENDENCY.
Having thus briefly sketched the historical development of
the Presbyterian system in Scotland, and shown the large
departure that was made from the Congregationalism of the
early reformed Churches, the attitude taken by the Presby-
terians towards Independency subsequent to 1581 may
now be described.
The first acquaintance that Scottish Presbyterians had
with English Independency was through a visit of the
person with whose name the rise of that system in England
has been usually associated — Robert Browne. Driven from
England by the persecution of Episcopalian churchmen he
went to Flanders, but, along with four or five companions
and their families, he resolved to visit Scotland, in the hope
of finding in it a more favourable field for his work as a
preacher than he had found in England. He landed at
Dundee towards the close of 1583, but though he found
some followers there he resolved to go on to Edinburgh.
Having visited Andrew Melville at St. Andrews, by whom
he was favourably received, he procured from him a letter
to one of the ministers in Edinburgh, James Lowson. On
his arrival in Edinburgh he at once began to preach his
doctrines concerning the " Church." These appear to have
been mild enough, for the chief objection taken to his views
by the ministers of Edinburgh was based on his assertion
15
16 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
that " separation from Churches in which discipline was not
rigorously exercised was lawful," and that " witnesses at
baptism was a thing indifferent." " Sundry other opinions
he had," but what these were has not been noted by any
Scottish historian of the time. He was summoned before
the Presbytery of Edinburgh, before which he boldly declared
that the " whole discipline was amiss," and appealed from
the Session to the civil magistrate. On the 20th January,
1584, he was brought before the Presbytery, with the result
that two ministers were appointed to " gather the erroneous
articles and present them to the king." There is no record
of what followed upon this beyond the significant words
of Calderwood,^ that Browne and his companions were
" entertained (or favoured) to molest the kirk," from which
it may be inferred that the king and the nobility were
rather pleased than otherwise by this attempt to boldly
defy the authority of the Church, and shielded him from
further persecution. Probably the resentment of the Edin-
burgh presbyters was aroused by his unscrupulous attack
upon their " discipline," as to which he gave the unflatter-
ing testimony that he had travelled over Scotland in its
" best reformed places," and that he had seen " all manner
of wickedness abound much more in their best places in
Scotland than in our worst places in England." ^ There is
no record of any churches or societies having been formed
by Browne in Edinburgh.
A few years after the visit of Browne, a more worthy
Independent than he came to Scotland — John Penry, who
became one of the first martyrs to Independency, and who
was executed at Tyburn in 1593. He also was driven to
Scotland by his persecutors, and remained there during
some four years — from 1589 to 1592. His time appears
to have been occupied during that period in continuing with
his pen the work of reform in which he had been engaged
in England, and while, doubtless, so bold and earnest a
champion of the "Congregational way" was not silent during
1 Calderwood's History, etc., vol. iv. , p. 1.
^ Dexter's Congre<jationalism as seen in its Literature, p. 78.
PRESBYTERIANS AND INDEPENDENCY 17
his residence in Scotland, there is no record of any movement
in favour of Independency having been initiated by him.^
There is no trace of any other visits of notable English
Independents to Scotland between the close of the sixteenth
century and the middle of the seventeenth. The fact, how-
ever, that Independency, or " Brownism " as it was called,
was well known to many of the people of Scotland, is amply
attested by repeated references to it as a dangerous heresy.
To some of those who professed its principles, and who had
come over from Ireland as fugitives from the persecuting
Episcopal Church there, Principal Baillie traced the revival
of the " weekly meeting," which excited the jealousy of the
clerical party, and which was at last put down. There
must have been many who came to Scotland during this
period well acquainted with English Independency and its
customs, and who would thus keep those they came in con-
tact with informed of the principles and practices of the
party. At any rate, the Presbyterian ministers became
alarmed at the spread of the system in England, and took
steps to prevent its entrance into Scotland.
1 There is no more touching story of the cruel persecutions of the Inde-
pendents in Queen Elizabeth's reign than that of John Penry. Shortly
before his death by hanging (on 20th May, 1593) he addressed a letter of
" protestation " to Lord Burghley : — " I am a poor young man," he said,
" born and bred in the mountains of Wales. I am the first, since the last
springing up of the Gospel in this latter age, that laboured to have the
blessed seed thereof sown in these barren mountains. I have often re-
joiced before God (He knoweth) that I had the favour to be born under her
majesty for the promoting of this work. . . . And now, being about to
end my days, before I am come to one-half of my years in the likely course
of nature, I leave the success of my labours unto such of my countrymen
as the Lord will raise up after me, for the accomplishing of that work
which, in the calling of my countrymen unto the knowledge of Christ's
blessed Gospel, I began. . . . Whatever I wrote in religion, the same I did
simply for no other end than for the bringing of God's truth to light. I
never did anything in this cause (Lord, Thou art witness !) for contention,
vain glory, or to draw disciples after me." — Inner Life of the Religioun
Societies of the Commonicealth, p. 42, by John Barclay, who prefaces this
dying appeal of a good man with the words: "Hard indeed must have
been the hearts that were not touched with the simple eloquence of a
young man who had lived for the good of others."
B
18 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
The earliest direct declaration of the General Assembly
against Independency was given in a letter of that body to
" some ministers in England," who had requested the advice
of the Assembly in regard to " a difference of great concern-
ment " that had arisen " among brethren" in England, to the
effect that " the whole power of Church-government, and all
the Acts thereunto pertaining (as election, ordination, and
deposition of officers, with admission, excommunication, and
absolution of members) are, by Divine ordinance, in foro
externo, to be declared by the most voices in and of every
particular congregation, which is (they say) the utmost
bound of a particular Church endued with power of govern-
ment ; and only some formalities of solemn execution to be
reserved to the officers, as servants of the said Church."
This letter is interesting as showing that Presbyterian
Churches in England, to which the writers of the letter
belonged, had become infected with the " gangrene " of Inde-
pendency. The reply of the Assembly, and its " unanimous
judgment," was decisive enough, and seems to show that the
high-water mark of " classical government " had been quite
reached at the time (1641). It was to the effect, that
" according to the order of the Eeformed Kirk and the
ordinance of God in His Word, not only the solemn execu-
tion of ecclesiastical power and authority, but the whole acts
and exercise thereof do 'pro'perly helong unto the officers of the
Kirk"''
In 1647 an Act of Assembly was passed clearly indi-
cating the fear of the Church-rulers that Independency
might extend to Scotland. " Considering how the errors of
Independency and separation have, in our neighbour king-
dom of England, spread as a gangrene, and do daily eat as a
canker, and how possible it is for the same evils to invade
and overspread this Kirk and kingdom by the spreading of
erroneous books, pamphlets, libels, and letters, and by con-
versing with them that are infected with these errors," the
Assembly " inhibited and discharged all members of the
Kirk and kingdom to converse with persons tainted with
'^Records ofiht Church of Scotland, p. 296.
PRESBYTERIANS AND INDEPENDENCY 19
such errors," and from selling or reading such books or
papers, and called on the civil magistrate to give effect to
this injunction.^ This was the first of several Acts of
Assembly of the same kind, and breathing the same intoler-
ant spirit, a spirit that was caught up so thoroughly by the
ministers of the Church that it became the practice for them
to debar from the Communion all who held the errors of
Independency or other specified heresies. Probably the act
just referred to was largely the result of the strong dislike
towards the Independents in England stirred by the letters
of Principal Baillie to the General Assembly during the
sittings of the Westminster divines who were drawing up the
Confession of Faith. Admitting that the Independents in
that Assembly were men " most able and of great credit," he
bitterly complained of their "unreasonable obstinacy"; but
his special grievance with them was that they aimed at
" toleration " or " full liberty of conscience to all religions
without any exceptions," and in 1645 he complained that
" the Independents were deviating more and more towards
old and new errors, especially liberty of conscience."^ From
these and other utterances of the time, we learn that the
principles of Independency were obnoxious to the Presby-
terians, on the ground not only that they involved the
liberties and rights of the congregation, which the Presby-
terians denied, but that the " liberty of conscience " which
Independents claimed for all opened the door for the tolera-
tion of heretical opinions of all sorts, a claim which was
directly opposed to the Presbyterian ideal of a national
church, in which there should be uniformity of religious
belief and practice. How such men as Baillie desired to
deal with the Independents is indicated in one of his letters
in which he says that he and his co-presbyters "purposed
not to meddle with Independency in haste, till it please God
to advance our (i.e., the Scotch) army, which, we expect, will
much assist our arguments !"^ The feeling of bitter opposition
1 Records of the Church of Scotland, p. 476.
2 Dexter, Congregationalism, etc., pp. 656, 657-
3 Waddington, Congregational History (1567-1700), p. 427.
20 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
to Independency thus displayed was fully sympathised with
by the Presbyterians in Scotland, and largely accounted for
the extreme measures taken to put down any attempt at
propagating the principles and practices of which their
brethren brought such an alarming account from England.
The advent of Cromwell and his army might have been
expected to obtain some footing for Independency in Scot-
land ; but, while by this unwelcome visit the Scottish people
became better acquainted with the doctrines and practices
of the Independents than they had been through the ful-
minating Acts of the Assembly and the preaching of their
ministers, it does not appear that during the Protectorate
Independency made any headway, or that any Independent
Churches were formed in Scotland. This may be accounted
for in two ways. In the first place, the Independents, under
Cromwell, came as a conquering army, and their advent
roused the national feeling so as to lead the people to regard
them as their enemies, and to have a strong prejudice
against them and all their ways. In the second place,
Cromwell dealt very favourably with the Presbyterian party,
allowing them full liberty to hold their religious meetings so
long as these were not used for political purposes. There
were many disputes between the Presbyterians and the
English soldiers on matters of religion, but no attempt was
made to persecute or molest any of the people or ministers,
and even Presbyterian historians admit that " the period
was one of remarkable religious prosperity,"^ one of them
going the length of declaring that he believed " there were
more souls converted in that short period of time (1650-
1658) than in any season since the Keformation, though of
triple its duration.^ Although during the Protectorate Inde-
pendent Churches may not have been formed, there is one
notable instance on record indicating that there were some
who were led to adopt the " Congregational way," though
not to the extent of fully separating themselves from the
Presbyterian Churches.
^ Hetherington's History, vol. i., p. 395.
■■^Kirkton's Secret and True History of the Church of Scotland, etc., p. 64.
PRESBYTERIANS AND INDEPENDENCY 21
At the battle of Dunbar, in 1650, one of the prisoners of
the Scottish army, taken by Cromwell, was Alexander
J affray, provost of Aberdeen. In his " Diary " he tells how
he " had frequent conferences with the Lord General (Crom-
well), Lieut.-General Fleetwood, and Dr. John Owen," at
Dunbar, the effect of which was seen in the change that
took place in his views regarding Church-government and
the principles and aims of Presbyterian Churchmen. On
his return to Aberdeen he appears to have had many
conversations with his friends, to whom he related his
adventures, and in particular his conferences with Cromwell
and Owen. The result of these communings was a document
which they drew up setting forth their views on the
question of church-order, and their dissatisfaction with the
discipline of the Presbyterian Churches at the time. The
heads of their contention were chiefly two. The first was
that they held the Church should be composed of those who
" with a profession of the truth join such a blameless and
Gospel-like behaviour, as they may be esteemed, in the
judgment of charity, believers, and their children," and that
they believed that in the Churches in Scotland the " holy
ordinances of Jesus Christ have been prostituted amongst us
by a profane multitude." This was virtually a protest
against the promiscuous communion that was notorious at
the time. The second head of their declaration had
reference to Church-government, concerning which they
said : " We profess, so far as we could see, with reverence
to precious and learned men of another judgment, that the
Congregational way comes nearer to the pattern of the
Word than our classical (or Presbyterian) form. And to us
it appears that Christ has furnished a congregation, with
their elderships, with complete power of jurisdiction and
censure within themselves."^ These views they supported
with many arguments and Scriptural proofs, so forcibly and
clearly stated that even at this day they would form a good
compendium of Congregational polity. The document was
signed by Jaffray, John Eow, William Moore, John Menzies,
^ Waddington, Congregational History, (1567-1700), pp. 486-505.
22 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
and Andrew Binnie, and is dated 24th May, 1652. So
serious a departure from orthodox ways was not to be
tolerated by the Church-courts, and accordingly we find that
in the following month the subscribers were summoned
before the Synod of Aberdeen, before which they boldly
re-affirmed the statements made in their declaration. After
having had the case under consideration for some months,
the Synod proceeded to deal with such of the subscribers as
were ministers, viz., John Eow, John Menzies, and John
Seton, minister of Old Aberdeen, the last of whom had in
the interval joined his brethren in their testimony.
Describing these men as having " separated themselves
from the discipline and government of this Kirk to Inde-
pendency," the Synod appointed certain members to confer
with them, and to report what hopes they had of " their
returning to the bosom of this Church." The brethren did
not wait for the deliverance of this committee, but in the
month of November, of 1652, they "did partake of the
Supper of the Lord publicly in the meeting-place called
Gray Friars." Probably this was the first meeting of
Independents (natives of Scotland) in a church-capacity that
had been held in Scotland. The movement, however,
appears to have speedily come to an end. The leaders of
the Kirk got alarmed, and sent down some of their best
men to Aberdeen from Edinburgh to confer with the
Independent party. As the result, Alexander Jaffray
departed from the high ground he at first took, and
declared " against separation," and the others appear to
have followed his example. The movement, though abortive
as an attempt to form a church, appears to have had
considerable influence on at least one of the ministers of
Aberdeen, Andrew Cant,^ who, after this, " exercised greater
^ The conduct of Andrew Cant at this time was in happy contrast to the
spirit he showed in the Assembly of 1639, at whicli, after the reading of the
"Large Declaration" of Dr. Balcanquel against the "Covenant" and
the anti-prelatio measures of the Assembly, Cant said, "It is so full of
gross absurdities that I think liawjing of the author should prevent all
farther censures," upon which the moderator answered, " That punishment
is not in the hands of kirkmen." — Records of the Kirk of Scotland,
p. 268.
PRESBYTERIANS AND INDEPENDENCY 23
care in the admission of persons to Lord's Table, and
instituted personal inquiry into their character and views
of Christian truth. "^
This, though only a historical incident, indicates that
there were many in Scotland during this period who were
favourable to Independency,^ both in regard to its principles
of a spiritual communion and its claim for the freedom of
the Churches, but who, like Alexander Jaffray, did not see
their way to a " separation " from the Presbyterian Church ;
and as the Independency which took the form of separation
was what Presbyterian churchmen chiefly detested, those
whose sense of duty did not lead them to take this course
were probably let alone.
1 Waddington's Congregational History, 1567-1700, pp. 494-505.
^Jaffray, indeed, said, "Some Christians in Aberdeen, men and women,
having for a long time been convinced of these things, long be/ore ever a
thoiight of them was with me, found themselves obliged to have the ordin-
ances administered in a more pure way than there was any hope ever to
have them in the national way." — Waddington's Congregational History y
1567-1700, p. 501.
CHAPTER III.
THE GLASITES.
The tyrannical oppression to which the Scottish Presby-
terians were subjected during the reigns of the last two
Stuart Kings had the effect of compelling them to close
their ranks in defence of both their civil and religious
liberty. The symbols of their union in this sacred cause
were the " Covenants." In former days there had gathered
around these documents fervent and reverent enthusiasm,
and it seemed to the best men of the Scottish nation that
never in their former history had the need of a common
testimony in defence of their principles been greater than
amid the conflicts with the civil powers that took place
during the thirty years prior to the Revolution of 1688,
Presbyterianism assumed a new complexion, and became
" covenanted " Presbyterianism. While the old Confession
and Books of Discipline were retained, and the Westminster
Confession still held its place as the acknowledged creed of
the Church, yet the documents which most really embodied
the faith and sentiments of the people were the national
covenants, especially the Solemn League and Covenant of
1643, which was the protest of the nation against Prelacy,
as the National Covenant of 1581 had been against Popery.
All the more impressive was the attitude of the people
with regard to the covenants from the circumstance that
there had arisen the practice of " covenanting," or a solemn
swearing of adherence to the covenants by the people on
24
THE GLASITES 25
special occasions, especially at communion seasons, when
no one who desired to maintain any reputation for religious
faith or patriotic feeling neglected to take the solemn oath
which formed part of the covenants. Strange as it may
seem, it was as a protest against the covenants and
covenanting that Independency in Scotland took its rise
early in the eighteenth century, and the first Independents
had to bear all the odium attaching to " anti-covenanters,"
and thus, though for different reasons, were classed along
with the supporters of Prelacy as opponents of what was
regarded as the " covenanted work of reformation." How
this came about will become apparent in the course of the
following sketch of the Glasites.
John Glas was born in 1696 at Auchtermuchty, in Fife,
where his father was parish minister. In 1719 he was
ordained minister of the parish of Tealing, near Dundee.
In the first year of his ministry he began a course of
lectures on the Shorter Catechism, and had proceeded as far
as the question, " How doth Christ execute the office of a
King ? " when, as his biographer states, " he was brought to
a stand,"^ for he found he could not reconcile the Scriptural
answer to that question with the popular doctrine, which
held forth the binding obligation of the national covenants.
The feeling in favour of the covenants was so strong among
his parishioners that he found he could not venture to utter
a word of opposition to them without exposing himself to
the bitterest persecution, and to the risk of losing any
reputation he had for personal piety. For some time he
remained in doubt and hesitation as to the course he should
follow, but at length he " determined to be at the bottom of
this business, and that it should be determined to him by
the Word of the Lord Jesus Christ, and by that only."
After careful study of the whole matter, he arrived at the
following conclusions, which he afterwards boldly defended
before the Church Courts : — That there is no warrant in the
New Testament for a National Church ; that the magistrate,
as such, has no place in the Church, and has no right to
^Memoir of John Glas, p. 5, 1813.
26 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
punish for heresy ; that both the National Covenant and
the Solemn League and Covenant are without Scriptural
grounds ; and that the true reformation is one that can be
carried out, not by political and secular weapons, but by the
Word and Spirit of Christ only. Although Mr. Glas's
views were set forth at length in defence of these pro-
positions, both in his speeches and writings, especially in
his work, " The Testimony of the King of Martyrs,"
practically his course was determined, on the one hand,
by his strong opposition to the secularising spirit prevalent
in the Established Church, and, on the other, by his con-
viction that the only church-life set forth in the New
Testament, other than that of the church universal, was
that of believers in Christ associated together in personal
fellowship.
His views now began to appear in his preaching, and
called forth much adverse criticism on the part of his
people and of those ministers who had become aware of
the principles he had adopted. His own father was among
the first to brand him as an " Independent," and as an
" Ishmaelite, whose hand would be against every man, and
every man's hand against him " ; and his father-in-law,
Mr. Black, one of the ministers of Perth, told him that
" all his fighting was in vain, for what he aimed at would
never take place." Gradually, however, his parishioners
came to appreciate his preaching, and to fall in v/ith his
views, and a true spiritual revival took place among them.
In his desire to give practical effect to his views, he
separated those whom he regarded as believers into a
society for mutual fellowship, which speedily increased by
accessions from other parishes. According to the first roll,
dated 13th July, 1725, their number amounted to nearly
one hundred. At their first meeting they agreed to join
together in Christian fellowship, to follow Christ as their
Lord, and to walk together in brotherly love and all the
duties of it. At subsequent meetings they resolved to
observe the Lord's Supper once a month, to follow the
directions of Christ as given in Matthew xviii. with regard
THE GLASITES 27
to offences, and to make a collection for the poor among
them.
Owing to Mr. Glas's labours having been in a rural
parish, it was some time before public attention was drawn
to his departure from orthodox doctrine and practice. Had
it not been that he was called on to preach during a
Communion season in company with one of the most
zealous defenders of the covenants, Mr. Willison, of Dundee,
and to utter his protest against covenanting in the presence
of one who regarded the practice as the very highest form
of practical Christianity, Mr. Glas might have gone on in
his chosen course for a long time without being called in
question. But his co-presbyter held " covenanting obliga-
tions " to be too sacred to be treated after the manner of
Mr, Glas, and he took such steps as raised the whole
question at the next Presbytery meeting. It would be
tedious to detail the whole process of procedure that
followed. But the fact that three years elapsed before the
case was brought to a conclusion indicates the difficulty
the ministers found in dealing with it, and their unwilling-
ness to act harshly towards one held in such high respect
among them as Mr. Glas was. After many conferences and
discussions, Mr. Glas was suspended from the ministry at a
meeting of the Synod of Angus and Mearns, held in April
1728. He appealed to the General Assembly, and his
appeal was accompanied by a petition from the elders,
deacons, and parishioners of Tealing, in which they gave
earnest testimony of their grateful appreciation of Mr.
Glas's labours among them, and their urgent desire that he
should be allowed to remain among them. They stated
that when he began his ministry among them " the parish
was almost void of anything in the form of religion," and
bore testimony to the great change that had taken place
among tjie people under his ministry. They added, that it
"looked very terrible to them that the work of the Lord
should be put to a stop among them." The appeal and
petition received such favourable consideration as to indicate
the wish of the church-rulers to find a way out of the
28 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
difficulty short of actual deposition ; but Mr. Glas's own
action, in refusing to refrain from preaching after his sus-
pension, altered the case from being one of prosecution for
heresy to one of " contumacy," and, as in most cases of the
latter kind, the Assembly showed less consideration for one
who defied their authority than for one who departed from
their doctrine. The result of Mr. Glas's action, and of
subsequent procedure, was that he was deposed from the
ministry in 1730, chiefly on the ground that he had shown
" contempt of the judicatories of the Church in continuing
to exercise his ministry after he had been suspended."
Nine years later the sentence of deposition was recalled, a
significant expression of the high regard in which Mr. Glas
was held as a Christian man : but long before this he had
ceased to have any desire to return to the Established
Church.
For some time Mr. Glas remained in Tealing preaching
the Gospel, and ministering to the church that had already
gathered around him as its pastor. The principle by which
he professed to be guided in all that concerned both
Christian and Church-life, namely, that Scripture is the
only standard of both doctrine and practice, was one to
which he gave steadfast adherence, and which he never
failed to enjoin upon his people. Finding on a closer
examination of the New Testament that the first disciples
came together on the first day of the week to break bread
(Acts ii. 42, and xx. 7) they decided to observe the Lord's
Supper every Sabbath instead of once every month. They
sought also to adhere strictly to the teaching of Christ with
regard to offences, to follow Scriptural example by repeating
the word " Amen " at the close of all prayers offered in
public, to insist upon all the members, according to their
ability, contributing to the support of the ordinances of the
Gospel, to offer the kiss of charity to each other, and " to
abstain from things strangled and from blood." A further
step was taken in connection with the matter of Church-
polity, for they came to the conclusion that Scripture
teaching and example were in favour of a plurality of elders
THE GLASITES 29
or pastors in each church, and that what is called a " learned
ministry " was not necessary for the well-being of the
churches. It also became a practice among them to require
a unanimous vote of the members at a church meeting
before any resolution took effect.
In 1730 Mr. Glas removed to Dundee, where a church
was formed, consisting at first of those who had been accus-
tomed to go to Tealing on Sabbath days. Mr. Archibald,
parish minister of Guthrie, who had been deposed for
" adhering " to Mr. Glas, was chosen elder of the church in
Tealing, along with a Mr. William Scott, a " layman," while
James Cargill, a handloom weaver, became the co-elder of
Mr. Glas. After suffering many hardships for adherence to
his principles, and many severe family afflictions, Mr. Glas
died in the house of his daughter at Perth, and his body
was interred at Dundee, where a monument to his memory
bears the following inscription : — " John Glas, minister of
the Congregational Church in this place, died November
1773, aged 78 years. He long survived Katherine Black,
his beloved wife (interred also in the same grave) ; also of
his children, fifteen in number, many of whom arrived at
mature age, and nine lie here beside their parents. His
character in the churches of Christ is well known, and will
outlive all monumental inscrij)tions."
Although the feeling of opposition to Mr. Glas's doctrines
and practices was very strong, there were not a few, both
among the ministers and people in Scotland, who sympa-
thised with his views in regard to the covenants and the
spiritual nature of the Kingdom of Christ. It is high
testimony of the singular worth and Christian excellence of
the man, as well as of the impressive character of his
preaching, that on one occasion, after preaching at Alyth,
the minister of the parish, Mr. Ayton, came to him, and
embracing him, said, " Oh, Jock, what would become of me
but for that New Covenant ! " Churches were formed in
Paisley, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Leith, Arbroath, Montrose,
Aberdeen, Dunkeld, Leslie, Cupar, Galashiels, Liverpool,
and London. Of the Church in London Mr. Michael
30 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Faraday, the distinguished scientist, was for a long period
an honoured elder.
In 1736 Eobert Sandeman, who had finished his studies
with a view to the ministry in connection with the Established
Church, joined the Glasites, and became an elder of the
Church in Perth. He married a daughter of Mr. Glas, and
afterwards removed to London, and finally to America, where
he died at Danbury in 1770. While Glas had adhered to the
doctrines set forth in the Westminster Confession, except those
concerning the Church and the functions of the civil magis-
trate, Sandeman became better known as the advocate of
peculiar theological views, especially concerning the nature
of faith, than as a Glasite. Hence in England and America,
where his views found acceptance with many, his followers
were known as Sandemanians. His distinctive doctrine is
stated on his tombstone—" That the bare death of Jesus
Christ, without a thought or deed on the part of man, is
sufficient to present the chief of sinners spotless before
God." His teachings attracted more attention in England
than in Scotland, chiefly owing to the letters and strictures
of Andrew Fuller, Baptist minister of Kettering, who
vigorously opposed his doctrine as unscriptural and dangerous.
Even in Scotland, however, Sandeman's views found favour
with many of the students who attended the theological
classes maintained by the Haldanes early in the century, and
at one time threatened to become an occasion of division as
serious as that which took place in connection with the
Morisonian doctrine at a later date.
Like some other movements of the kind, that initiated by
Mr. Glas lost its fair promise of power and influence for
good throughout Scotland owing to the addition of views and
practices that became repulsive to the good sense and
Christian feeling of many who sympathised with the leading
principles for which Mr. Glas had originally contended.
The narrowness and exclusiveness of the Glasite Churches,
their non-missionary and unaggressive spirit, their indulgence
in a selfish seclusion as churches for the promotion of their
own edification and comfort, their contempt for an " educated
THE GLASITES 31
ministry," and the tendency towards a loose and worldly way
of life that became manifest among many of them in later
years, — all these tended to alienate the Christian people who
otherwise might have been drawn to their communion. A
Presbyterian annalist ^ says of them that if they " had united
the suavity of the Gospel with their spiritual views of the
Messiah's kingdom," there would have been little room for
the Eelief and other churches formed by secessions from
the Establishment. Glas was too much of a " viewy " man
to be a safe and wise leader of such a great work as that
which he initiated, and had his strength of mind and Christian
wisdom been as strongly developed as his personal piety, he
might have been the pioneer of a movement that probably
would have altered the whole character and complexion of
the history of religion in Scotland.
Glasite societies have now ceased to exist. Many years
ago they were split up into several parties — three at least —
and those of the one party disavowed all fellowship with the
others. Their history has been singularly like that of the
Plymouth Brethren, whose views and practices have been
to a large extent a revival of those of the Glasites. The
last of the Sandemanian Churches in America became
extinct in 1890.
iDr. Struthers, History of the Relief Church, pp. 177-179.
CHAPTER IV.
THE OLD SCOTS INDEPENDENTS.
The eighteenth century was the birth-period of most of the
religious denominations that now exist in Scotland, and the
Glasite community of churches was the first of many that
followed. In 1733 — three years after the deposition of
John Glas — the Secession Church came into existence by
the secession from the Established Church of the brothers
Erskine and those who adhered to him, on the ground
chiefly of their opposition to the Patronage Acts of the
Established Church, and the scandalous proceedings that
had taken place in the forcing upon unwilling congregations
of men who were supported by the patrons of parishes and
by the church courts. In 1752 another secession took
place, that of the Eelief Church, composed of those who not
only protested against patronage, but " pled for a state of
things which left ministers a great deal of ministerial
freedom, and which made church courts rather consultative
meetings than legislative assemblies." This latter body,
indeed, sought to revert to the state of things that obtained
in the Presbyterian Church of Scotland when " it was
dissociated from the State, when her assemblies and presby-
teries were proscribed, and congregations maintained their
own ordinance and managed their own affairs."^ The Ptelief
movement was a distinct advance upon that of the Secession
Church in the direction of congregational freedom, and was
1 Dr. Struthers, Hiatory of the Relief Church, p. 71.
32
THE OLD SCOTS INDEPENDENTS 33
virtually an attempt to continue the contendings of John
Glas in their main points, with a minimum of departure
from Presbyterian usages. In 1768 the Old Scots Inde-
pendents came into existence, in 1769 the Old Scotch
Baptists, in 1780 the Bereans, and in 1798 the Modern
Congregationalists. Besides these, there were several
religious societies that were formed during the century
which never developed into associations of churches. So
early as 1704 the followers of Mr. Macmillan, minister of
Balmaghie in Fife, took up the testimony of the old " society
men " of covenanting days, who held aloof from the Estab-
lished Church on the ground of failure on the part of the
Government and of the Church to adhere to the whole
testimony of the Covenants, and they may be regarded as
the predecessors of the Cameronian or Eeformed Presby-
terian Church of later days. In 1707 Mr. John Hepburn,
minister of Urr, was deposed for adherence to views that
were substantially those of the Secession Church of a later
period, but the company that adhered to him was scattered
after his death. Several other movements of a similar
character were initiated by men who failed to persevere in
them, or who drew back to the bosom of the Established
Church when they discovered the sacrifices required of them.
The Old Scots Independents trace the origin of their
churches to the teaching of James Smith of Newburn, and
James Ferrier of Largo, neighbouring parishes in Fife, of
which they were ministers. Their " Case " ^ is interesting,
as indicating that they had adopted Congregational prin-
ciples after an independent investigation of the whole
subject of church order. As the result of their inquiry,
they decided to sever their connection with the Established
Church, which they did in 1768. The opinions set forth
in their " Case " may be comprised under the heads of —
1. Civil establishments of religion ; 2. Church government ;
and 3. Doctrine. The two ministers could not accept the
principle of civil establishments of religion, which they
1 The Case of James Smith, late minister at Newhurn and Robert Ferrier,
late minister at Largo, truly represented and defended, 1768.
C
34 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
regarded as opposed to the spiritual nature of the kingdom
of Christ. They also found no support in Scripture for
the classical or presbyterian form of church order, but
held that " every single congregation, united in the faith,
hope, and obedience of the Gospel, is independent of any
other congregation, and that by having the Lord Jesus
Christ as their Head they are complete in themselves."
In addition, Messrs. Smith and Terrier accepted the prin-
ciple of a plurality of elders maintained by the Glasites,
and also followed them in having the " kiss of charity,"
mutual exhortation, and in their disregard for an " educated
ministry." They also denounced what was then called
" occasional," or, as it is now called, " open," communion.
In doctrinal matters they objected to the statements of
the Westminster Confession regarding the Eternal Sonship
of Christ and the Procession of the Spirit. They also
objected to the description of the " principal acts of saving
faith " as " accepting, receiving, and resting upon Christ
alone for justification, sanctification, and eternal life,"
holding that faith is not a complex but a simple act,
and consists of the acceptance of a truth or fact upon
sufficient testimony. Saving faith they held to be the
believing acceptance of God's testimony concerning His
Son, which believing acceptance produces " a receiving,
resting, and relying on Him for salvation." Traces of
the influence of Sandeman's teaching may be found in
these views. Other differences from the Confession are
stated in the " Case," but these are the most important.
After their secession from the Established Church,
Messrs. Smith and Terrier, along with those of their
congregations who joined them, met together as a church
in Balchristie, and the two ministers were eventually
ordained as " elders," while others were appointed to " care
for the poor," who were afterwards called " deacons."
The second church that was formed was in Glasgow.
Ecclesiastical affairs in that city had prepared the minds
of some members of the Established Church for receiving
some such views as those advocated by Messrs. Smith and
THE OLD SCOTS INDEPENDENTS 35
Terrier. Between 1760 and 1768 the Town Council and
the Session of the city both claimed the right to present
ministers to the churches, and carried their contention to
the Court of Session, which ultimately decided in favour
of the Council. As the result, " a minister was thrust
into the Wynd Church against the minds of those who
were regarded as the orthodox part of the congregation,"
of whom David Dale appears to have been the leader. A
Eelief Church was started, but troubles in connection with
that raised doubts in the minds of many as to the Presby-
terian form of Church government. At this time Mr. John
Barclay, the founder of the " Bereans," visited Mr. Dale,
and as the result of their conference the latter, along with
others, left the Relief Church and formed themselves into
a separate church. For a time they met in a private
house, but afterwards, their numbers increasing, they built
a place of worship in Greyfriars Wynd. About this time
the " Case " of Messrs. Smith and Terrier came into their
hands, and finding the views therein contained in harmony
with their own, they sent a deputation to the Church in
Balchristie, with the result that a union was formed
between the two churches. The communications between
them became frequent, and at last it was proposed that
Mr. Ferrier should be sent by the Church in Balchristie
to Grlasgow. This was agreed to, the former Church
choosing a James Simpson, a weaver at Largo, to be
Mr. Smith's colleague, and the latter choosing David Dale
to be Mr. Ferrier's colleague. At this time the Church
in Glasgow consisted of twenty-six members. When the
new place of worship was opened, it was visited by a
noisy crowd of people, and the members were exposed to
a good deal of ridicule and reproach, Mr. Dale being often
openly insulted in the streets, and " looked upon as a
person that ought not to be suffered to live."
Within two years the spirit of division appeared in the
Glasgow Church, and was occasioned by difference of
opinion on such points as whether the Lord's Prayer
should form part of the worship on the first day of the
36 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
week ; whether " Amen " should be audibly pronounced
by the congregation at the close of prayer offered in
public ; and whether the people should stand while singing
as well as while praying. Mr. Dale urged forbearance
until they should see whether they could not ultimately
come to be of one mind in such matters ; but Mr. Terrier
strongly advocated " unity of judgment." The result was
that the latter, and a few who adhered to him, left the
Church and joined the Glasite Church in the city.
The reading of the " Case " by some person in Montrose
also led to the formation of a church there, and a church in
Marykirk was formed by several persons who at first had
been connected with the church in Montrose. In addition
to these two, the churches in Perth, Methven, and Kirk-
caldy, sprung from the church in Balchristie, while those
in Hamilton, Paisley, and New Lanark, sprung from the
church in Glasgow. A church was also formed in Edin-
burgh as the result of correspondence with the Glasgow
church, and a church came into existence in Galashiels
in the same way. In Earlsferry there had been an Inde-
pendent Church of the " Tabernacle " ^ persuasion, but about
the year 1813 the members united with the Old Scots
Independent churches. A church was formed in Airdrie
in 1807 or 1808, but did not remain long in connection
with the other churches, owing to division on the question
of baptism. In Dundee a church was founded by Mr.
Andrew Scott, who had been deposed by the Anti-Burgher
Synod for contending against the practice in that body
of " swearing the covenants " as a term of communion. The
church was formed in 1769, and Mr. Scott continued to be
presiding elder for some twenty years later, when he had to
retire owing to certain charges against his moral character
having been found j)roved. Por a short time there was
a small church in Newburgh, under the care of a Mr.
^ In the early years of the ceutury the churches formed by the Haldanes
and their fellow- workers were called "Tabernacle" churches, from the
name given to the building erected for Mr. James Haldane, and in which
he preached, in Edinburgh. It was also applied to several other buildings
in which the Congregationalists worshipped.
THE OLD SCOTS INDEPENDENTS 37
Pirie, at that time well known by his writings, and who
had left the Secession Church. There was a friendly
correspondence kept up between the church in Dundee and
the Berean Church in Sauchieburn, of which the Eev. Mr.
Macrae (successor to John Barclay) was pastor towards the
close of last century. These churches in Dundee, New-
burgh, and Sauchieburn did not, however, adhere to the
principles and practices of the Old Scots Independents in
all respects. The two latter appear always to have had a
" pastor," and to have differed little from the " Tabernacle "
Independents, except perhaps that they were not so strict in
their admission of members. It was not till 1789, a short
time before his retirement, that Mr. Andrew Scott and the
members of the church in Dundee adopted the principle
of a plurality of elders. In that year a Mr. Alexander
Kirkcaldy was associated with Mr. Scott as elder. He died
in 1803, and Mr. William Maxton, who had been trained
in Mr. Haldane's classes, was chosen elder. After his
decease in 1818 the church resolved to avoid having as
elder anyone trained in an academy, and chose one of their
own number, a James Donald, a merchant, as elder. About
this time the church in Dundee made a departure from the
practice then common among the churches, of having a
collection taken at the door of the place of meeting as
the congregation retired, and adopted the practice of having
a collection taken immediately after the Lord's Supper, by
which the poor were aided and all other expenses defrayed.
Such is an outline of the origin of the Old Scots Inde-
pendent churches, and their history down to about the year
1814 — a period of 46 years. At the close of this period it
was found that most of them had suffered from internal
division, owing to differences of opinion on minor points,
which members would not make a matter of forbearance.
But the chief cause of reduced strength was in the secession
of many of the members to the Baptists, especially during
the first few years of the century.
In 1814 an event took place which, for a time, awakened
a good deal of interest among the churches, and which they
38 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
hailed as promising a time of renewed prosperity. This was
the union of the churches with a body called the Inghamite
churches in England, which had been originated by the
teaching and labours of a Mr. Ingham, a former colleague
in America and England of Mr. John Wesley. Both he
and Mr. Wesley had laboured for some years in America in
connection with the Moravians, but being dissatisfied with
what he regarded as their arbitrary proceedings, Mr. Ingham
severed his connection with them and returned to England.
He commenced preaching in Colne in 1743, and was joined
by a Mr. Batty. Both of them went about preaching in
various parts of England, and founded several " societies."
His former fellow-worker, Mr. Wesley, who was labouring
in the neighbourhood of Colne about 1745, tried to persuade
Mr. Ingham to join his (Mr. Wesley's) party, but without
success, Mr. Ingham not being able to agree with Mr.
Wesley's views on perfection. Whether as the result of
independent thinking, or of former conferences with Mr.
Wesley, Mr. Ingham laid down certain rules for the guid-
ance of the societies founded by him not unlike those of the
Wesleyan party. Each society was under the superintendence
of stewards, and a stated collection of 2d. per month was
made by every member who was able, not for payment of
preachers, but for expenses connected with worship. Appli-
cants for admission to the society were received, if no
objection were made, but no promise was made, nor any
rules or orders subscribed, though it was expected that so
long as they were connected with the society the members
were " to have their salvation at heart, and live and walk as
became followers of Christ." If the Church was unable to
agree as to the admission of a member the matter was
determined by lot.
About 1761 Mr. Ingham and several of the leaders
came to the conclusion that a more scriptural and settled
form of church order than had prevailed among them was
desirable, and the discussions that arose in connection with
this led to a division among the churches, many of the
members leaving the societies and joining Glasite churches.
THE OLD SCOTS INDEPENDENTS 39
Those who remained ultimately adopted the principles and
practices of the Scots Independents, and this similarity of
view paved the way for the union which ultimately took
place.
In 1813 the Inghamite churches in existence were 13,
viz., in Kendal, Nottingham, Bulwell, Tadcaster, Howden,
Leeds, Wibsey and Bradford, Todmorden, Salterforth, Kuth-
well and Tosside, Winewall near Colne, Wheateley, and
Haslingden. The number of members in all these churches
was 252. In the same year the Scots Independent churches
were 12, viz., in Perth, Dundee, Kirkcaldy, Balchristie,
Earlsferry, New Lanark, Hamilton, Edinburgh, Glasgow,
Marykirk, Methven, Paisley. There was also a church in
London which was in fellowship with the Scots churches.
The total number of members in these 13 churches was 501.
Although much appears to have been expected from the
union, the only practical result was the occasional exchange
of a circular letter by the churches in England and Scotland.
From a pamphlet which appeared in 1837, entitled " The
Substance of a Correspondence between the Old Scotch
Independent Church in Dundee and the Churches of the
same Denomination in the West of Scotland," it appears
that several of the churches were in a declining state, and
gave the members great concern. While churches had been
formed in Falkirk, West Quarter (or Glassford), and Les-
mahagow between 1814 and 1837, the churches in Earls-
ferry, Marykirk, and Montrose had become extinct, and
most of the other churches were not in a prosperous state.
The causes of this decline appear to have been threefold : —
(1.) The Congregational and Baptist churches that had come
into existence during the first forty years of the present
century appear to have attracted the class of people who
formerly were disposed to join the Old Scots Independents,
and thus, so to speak, stopped their supply of members.
(2.) These churches also afforded an open door to those Old
Scots Independents who were dissatisfied with the state of
things in their own churches. But (3.) probably the chief
cause of decay among the churches was their non-aggressive
40 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
and non-evangelistic character. The members appear to
have done little or nothing in the way of preaching the
gospel to the multitude, but contented themselves with the
enjoyment of church privileges for themselves. In a letter
written by Mr. James M'Gavin, elder of the church in
Paisley, written in 1822, this is pathetically confessed ; but
the attempt is made to excuse this grave defect by pleading
the inability of most of the preaching or teaching elders to
carry on evangelistic work, both owing to the lack of
qualifications for this kind of work, and to the available
time of elders able to preach being wholly taken up in
teaching the churches, all of them being engaged in business,
— a virtual confession of the practical failure of their views
regarding the pastorate and their disregard for an " Educated
Ministry,"
Only one Old Scots Independent Church now exists, and
meets in Oswald Street, Glasgow.
Note. —Most of the foregoing sketch is taken from a pamphlet published
in 1814 entitled A Short Arcoimt of the Bise and EMahUsJiment of the
Churches in Scotland commonhj denominated the Old Scotch Independents.
■
■
^^^^^!^^H
H
E
^'^^
1
L
^4i^
HH
BP^
■
i
MK0C fi^'^S^^^^H
^^^Ei:^
»
1
<^^B
Hj
1
fl
""j^
" >.. :,' ;! '^ '^^^^^^^^^^^^^H
^K'''
^m
[^^^H
t
■fji^jB
''?j^^^^^H
^H
ll^
Jt
■
^^^B
J. A. Hai.dane, 1768-1851.
PART II.
LATER INDEPENDENCY IN SCOTLAND.
CHAPTER V.
BEGINNINGS.
Unlike the earlier Independency, of which a sketch has been
given, and which originated in the adoption of its principles
as the result of independent study of the Scriptures by
individuals such as Glas, Smith, and Ferrier, what we may
call the later Independency which was introduced towards the
close of the eighteenth century, had several originating causes.
In the first place, at least one Independent church was
originated through the ministrations of one who had no
connection with any of the religious bodies in Scotland.
This was the case with regard to the church in Annan,
which was formed in 1794, and whose first pastor was the
Rev, Andrew Carnson, who belonged to Ireland. A more
detailed account of this, the first of the later Independent
churches in Scotland, is given at a later stage of this
history. Attention is now directed to this case as indi-
cating the origin of a church in circumstances different
from those that existed in connection with the formation of
any other church of the Independent order,
A second class of churches originated owing to the
narrow and somewhat tyrannical action of some of the
41
42 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Presbyterian church courts, which moved members and
ministers of Presbyterian churches to seek the liberty
denied them in their own denomination, and who left it
without in the first instance having any clear idea of Inde-
pendent principles, which were intelligently adopted only
at a later period. To this class belong the churches in
Huntly, Perth, Paisley, and other places. Although their
formation as Independent churches did not take place until
the last few years of the century, they had in spirit and
practice adopted the principles of Congregational Inde-
pendency prior to that time.
A third class consisted of churches which appear to have
been originated by a number of pious men who had made
an independent study of the Scriptures and came to the
conclusion that the " Congregational way " was most in
accordance with New Testament teaching and example, and
who were also moved to seek a purer Christian fellowship
than they could find in the churches existing at the time.
To this class belong the church in Belmont Street, Aberdeen,
and the church in Montrose.
A fourth and the most numerous class of churches
consisted of those the origin of which can be traced to the
great evangelistic movement that took place in Scotland
during the last few years of the century, and with which
the names of the brothers Haldane, and Messrs. Campbell,
Rate, Aikman, and others are associated.
While it is necessary, in order to historical accuracy, to
note this fact of the several originating causes of later
Independency, it is significant that most of the churches of this
order came into existence within the short period of four years
from 1794 to 1798, thus indicating that there must have
been some common causes of their origin, or rather of the
state of mind and religious feeling of which they were the
expression. A study of the state of religious opinion and
sentiment in Scotland during the last ten years of the
century will indicate what some of these originating causes
were.
In the first place, the state of religion at the time was
BEGINNINGS 43
such as, in a negative way, prepared the way for at least
some great change in the existing state of things. In the
Established Church of Scotland what was called the
Moderate party was in the ascendant. The ministers of
that class were, as a rule, little more than mere ecclesi-
astical functionaries, jealous of place and power, lacking in
earnestness and evangelical belief or zeal, and having little
sympathy with popular aspirations of a social, political, or
religious nature.^ In the non-established churches there
was a spirit of narrowness and conservatism that was
irritating and discouraging to the Christian men of earnest
and evangelical spirit among them. It was the period in
which " testifying " had become exalted to a religion in
itself, and when both in the pulpit and among individuals
the desire was shown rather to exhibit and condemn the
errors of others than to emphasise and hold any positive
truths or doctrines in which men believed. The old
"covenanting" spirit still prevailed, and showed itself in
bitter antagonism. Even the Independents of the Glasite
and Old Scots Independent Churches were as narrow and
exclusive in their spirit and practices as those who belonged
to the Presbyterian parties of the time, and regarded the
spirit of mutual forbearance in connection with minor
matters as unfaithfulness to the particular testimony which
they felt called on to make. While this exclusive and
antagonistic spirit characterised most of the professing
Christians at the time, there were many to whom it was
distasteful, and who longed for some better way, although
not knowing how or where it could be found. It was from
among this class, men who had come under the influence of
the revival in connection with the labours of the Eev.
George Whitefield and others about the middle of the
century, that the religious movement which resulted in the
formation of many Congregational Churches at the end of
the century had many of its supporters, and who welcomed
it as affording them a way of escape from the bigotry and
exclusiveness that prevailed among all religious parties.
1 See Appendix B.
44 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
In the second place, the minds of men of all classes were
stirred by the events connected with the French Eevolution.
The influence of that great moral and social and political
convulsion was felt in Great Britain, only in a less degree
than in France itself. Its advent and progress ushered in a
time of intellectual awakening, and a spirit of free and
fearless inquiry pervaded men of all classes. In Scotland
its influence was seen in societies of those who called them-
selves " Friends of the people," whose members met in many
parts of the country to discuss reforms of all kinds, political,
social, and religious. Many of those who took part in these
discussions had little idea of associating religion with them,
but the spirit of free inquiry extended also to questions
connected with religious life and doctrine and religious
institutions of all kinds. One of the most prominent and
active leaders of the religious movement that began in the
closing years of the century — Kobert Haldane^ — left upon
record his confession that " he was aroused from the sleep of
spiritual death by the excitement of the French Eevolution."^
Doubtless there were many more who shared his experience,
and who, if not prepared to associate as closely as he did a
political event with a change in their views of religion, were
spiritually awakened, largely through the spirit of intel-
lectual freedom and inquiry which had dawned upon their
lives.
In the third place, the birth-period of the Congregational
churches was marked by the intense religious zeal and
activity of the men who afterwards became the leaders of
the movement that resulted in the formation of most of
these churches. Having found the blessings of the Gospel
for themselves, they were moved to seek the spiritual good
of all whom they could reach. This spirit had not always
characterised the various religious movements that had
taken place in Scotland. While every one of the secessions
from the Established Church that had taken place during
the eighteenth century was the result of a revived interest
^ See Appendix A.
^ Lives of Robert and James Haldane, p. 74.
BEGINNINGS 45
in religion, and was accompanied by many proofs of
awakened religious life and zeal, there had been no marked
manifestation of an evangelistic or missionary spirit, or of a
desire to carry the Gospel to the masses of the people living
in spiritual ignorance and destitution. Each party was
chiefly concerned to uphold its special testimony, and to
organise the new religious body that had come into existence.
Even the great revival movement which took place about
the middle of the century in connection with the labours of
the Eev. George Whitefield was marked by no special desire
or effort on the part of those who had been awakened into a
new religious life to seek the salvation of men around them.
It no doubt had its quickening and leavening influence on
many in connection with all the churches in Scotland at the
time, and for many years afterwards ; but there is nothing
on record to show that it resulted in any special aggressive
effort on the part of Christian men to seek the extension of
Christ's kingdom among the ignorant and neglected people
who may be said to have been the home-heathendom of the
time. But what had been the chief lack of former religious
movements became the most marked feature of the great
movement which took place towards the close of the century.
From first to last it was an aggressive and evangelistic
movement, and the men who took the leading part in it
were as fully animated by the missionary spirit as they had
been in seeking to become missionaries to the heathen
abroad. Congregationalism in Scotland owes its origin to
the aggressive spirit of the men who having been denied
the opportunity of carrying the Gospel to the foreign
heathen sought to be missionaries of the Gospel to the
people of their own laud.
The missionary and evangelistic enterprise which thus
marked the movement that ultimately resulted in the
formation of most of the Congregational churches in Scot-
land at the end of the eighteenth century took several
forms, and had several stages of development.
1. Towards the end of 1795, Mr. Robert Haldane, having,
to use his own words, " obtained the consolations of the
46 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Gospel," was moved by a strong desire to do something for
the extension of the kingdom of Christ. At that time his
friend, the Rev. William Innes^ of Stirling, handed to Mr.
Haldane a copy of the first number of the " Periodical
Accounts of the Baptist Mission in Bengal." His mind
was deeply impressed with the grandeur of the enterprise in
which Dr. Carey was then engaged, and he was filled with
the desire to give himself to the same great work. He
carefully considered the whole matter for some six months.
During that time the London Missionary Society was insti-
tuted, and the interest of many Christian people in foreign
missions was greatly deepened by this event ; Mr. Haldane
and his brother were among the first subscribers to the
funds of the Society. Mr. Haldane and Mr. Innes had
frequent conversations on the subject of missions, and at
length the former made the definite proposal that he and
several other brethren should devote the remainder of their
lives to the cause of Christian missions in Bengal. The
proposal was made to Mr. Innes, to Dr. Bogue of Gosport,
Mr. Greville Ewing of Edinburgh, and to Mr. John Ritchie
of Edinburgh, a printer, who, it was proposed, should super-
intend a printing establishment in connection with the
mission. Mr. Haldane offered to defray all expenses
connected with the enterprise. In May, 1796, he proceeded
to London to lay his proposal before the directors of the
East India Company, and for more than six months there-
after was engaged in various conferences with individual
directors and other public men of influence, with the view
of having their sanction given to his enterprise. But at the
end of the year there came a definite refusal on the part of
the directors, and the scheme had to be given up.
2. But the missionary zeal of the men who had been
thus prepared to give their lives and service to Christian
work abroad remained as strong as ever, and became
manifest in other directions. Early in 1796 the Edinburgh
Missionary Society was formed, and a weekly meeting for
prayer on behalf of foreign missions was started by friends
^ See Appendix A.
i
BEGINNINGS 47
interested in that great work. Another movement in the
same direction was initiated by the starting of the
Missionary Magazine, a periodical which afterwards became
one of the most powerful agencies in the promotion of the
missionary enterprise both at home and abroad. It was
originated through the exertions of the Eev. Greville Ewing,
who was its first editor, and whose main object was to make
it a vehicle of information regarding missionary work in all
parts of the world, and for the discussion of subjects
directly bearing on the missionary enterprise. It was the
first periodical of its kind that appeared in Scotland, and
the fact that during the thirteen months from the publica-
tion of the first number in July 1796 its average circulation
was from 5000 to 6000 copies, and that from the profits
there was the sum of £216 available for distribution
among five missionary societies, proved how wide-spread
was the interest in missions at the time. While originally
intended to be the advocate of foreign missions, it also
became the means of communication between a number of
earnest Christian men as to the best means to be employed
for the dissemination of Divine truth, not only in foreign
lands, but at home, and many suggestions and plans of
iisefulness found a place in its pages. It was the discussion
of these, and the information given by correspondents re-
garding the low state of religion in Scotland, that greatly
deepened the conviction of many Christian men that the
ordinary religious agencies in connection with the churches
were quite inadequate to meet the spiritual needs of the
people. Probably no single agency had greater influence in
stirring the religious life of the people ; and by the articles
and letters that appeared in its pages giving wise direction
to the various activities that were the outcome of the
awakened life that had become manifest throughout the
land, it had for some years a leading place in connection
with many forms of Christian enterprise.
3. The first movement in the direction of missionary effort
on behalf of the ignorant and neglected masses at home was
the institution of the Edinburgh Tract Society in 1795,
48 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
mainly by the exertions of Mr. John Campbell/ whose
place of business in the Grassmarket became a place of
resort for many Christian men who were anxious to be
useful. Within two years thereafter the Edinburgh Gratis
Sabbath School Society was instituted, mainly by the
enterprise of Mr. Campbell. Although called a " Sabbath
School " Society, its operations were by no means confined
to the religious instruction of young people, but were really
those of a home-mission for all classes of the people, chiefly
those who were outside the churches. A teacher was
appointed for each school, and one of the members of the
committee of the society was associated with him to aid
in the conductinsf of the religious devotional exercises, and
in addressing children, parents, and others who might be
induced to attend. Within six months after the formation
of this society thirty-four Sabbath schools had been opened
in Edinburgh and its neighbourhood, and soon after schools
began to be started in various parts of the kingdom.
4. The next stage in the development of the missionary
enterprise of the time was in the work of lay-preaching,
street-preaching, or field-preaching, as it was variously
called. It began in a very simple way, and with no idea on
the part of its originators that it would become the power-
ful religious agency it afterwards became. It may be said
to have been an outgrowth of the work of the Sabbath
School Society. Early in 1797 Mr. J. Haldane^ and Mr.
John Campbell visited Glasgow, Paisley, and Greenock for
the purpose of urging on any Christian friends they might
meet the desirableness of establishing Sabbath schools,
which had been found so successful in the eastern part
of Scotland. Their visit was followed by the best results,
and many schools were started. While on this mission
they distributed many religious tracts and engaged in
conversation with as many people as they could reach,
but as yet they did not venture to preach publicly.
Eeturning to Edinburgh, they resumed their work in
connection with the Sabbath schools. Mr. Campbell, who
^ See Appendix A. ^ Ibid.
BEGINNINGS 49
was always on the outlook for new fields of usefulness,
was much concerned about the religious destitution of
the people (chiefly colliers) in the village of Gilmerton,
with which he was well acquainted, and urged upon
ministers of the non-established churches in the neighbour-
hood their duty to supply the village with " sermon " from
time to time, but nothing came of this. Finding that one
of the students of Dr. Bogue's academy at Gosport was to
be in Edinburgh for a few weeks he asked him to conduct
a service in Gilmerton, where Mr. Campbell engaged to
secure a place of meeting. The student (Mr. Joseph Eate)
consented, and on the first Sabbath evening preached to
a large audience in a school-room in Gilmerton. When
Mr. Rate had to leave Edinburgh Messrs. Haldane and
Aikman^ were much concerned as to the continuing of
this good work, for the attendance had been increasing each
successive Sabbath evening. They could find no minister
or student to conduct the meeting ; neither of them had
as yet attempted to preach in public, and both were
unwilling to do so, not only because of their natural
diffidence, but because they were, no doubt, under the
influence of the feeling and opinion of most people at that
time, that only ordained ministers should be preachers of
the Gospel ; and but for the difficulty they had of having to
provide preaching for the many people who were eager
to hear, they would not have ventured to begin at this
time the work in which they afterwards became so useful.
At last they agreed to address the meeting on alternate
Sabbath evenings. The result was beyond what they ever
had expected. People from all quarters came to hear
Mr. Aikman and the " retired sea-captain " preaching the
Gospel. The work found no favour with the parish
minister, who found means to deprive the preachers
of the use of the school-room in which the meetings
had been held ; but a large barn was found, and to it
the people flocked in increasing numbers as the weeks
passed on.
^ See Appendix A.
D
50 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
5. A further stage of the movement was reached when
Messrs. Aikman and Haldane, having found their vocation
as preachers of the Gospel in Gilmerton, were led to inquire
whether they had not a call to other places as needful as
that village. The work in Gilmerton had begun in May,
1797, and during the next two months they had many con-
ferences with their friends, and in particular with their
pastor, the Eev. Mr. Black, minister of Lady Tester's Church,
in Edinburgh, who had shown much sympathy with their
work. The result was that a missionary tour through the
north of Scotland was resolved upon, and on 12th July, 1797,
Messrs. Haldane and Aikman set out upon their travels.
The undertaking which these two men entered upon was
a bold one, not only because of its novelty, but also because
" lay-preaching " was regarded by the ministers of the time
and many of the people as " disorderly," in respect that it
entrenched on what were regarded as the special functions of
ordained ministers, who alone were regarded as authorised
preachers of the Gospel. Missionary and preaching journeys
in Scotland had been known in Scotland prior to 1797, but
they had always been undertaken by ministers ; indeed, in
the previous year Mr. Haldane had been the companion of
the Eev. Charles Simeon, of Cambridge, on a journey similar
to that which Mr. Aikman and he now contemplated, but on
that occasion all the preaching was done by Mr. Simeon.
But, though fully aware of the suspicion and even opposition
to which their undertaking was exposed, they had fully
considered their action, and went forth confident that they
had been called to their work by God. They had the
encouragement of knowing that similar evangelistic work had
for some time been carried on in various parts of England,
and with much success. They had come fresh from the
good work in Gilmerton, in which their labours had been
greatly blessed. But, above all, they took their stand on
the teaching of Scripture. " We would not be understood
to mean," said Mr. Haldane in the introduction to the journal
of his tour which he afterwards wrote, " that every follower
of Jesus should leave the occupation by which he provides
BEGINNINGS 51
for his family to become a public preacher. It is an indis-
pensable Christian duty for every man to provide for his
family ; but we consider every Christian is bound, whenever
he has opportunity, to warn sinners to flee from the wrath
to come, and to point out Jesus as the way, the truth, and
the life. Whether a man declares these important truths to
two or two hundred, he is, in our opinion, a preacher of the
Gospel, or one who declares the glad tidings of salvation,
which is the precise meaning of the word preach." ^ Describ-
ing the purpose they had in view in undertaking their
missionary journey Messrs. Haldane and Aikman thus wrote
to the Missionary Magazine soon after setting out on their
work : " The advantages of missionary schemes both in Eng-
land and Scotland have remarkably appeared, not only in
exciting the zeal of Christian people to send the Gospel of
Jesus to the dark places of the earth, but to use means to
extend its influence at home. With this view a missionary
journey has been undertaken in the northern part of Scot-
land, not to disseminate matters of doubtful disputation, or
to make converts to this or the other sect, but to endeavour
to stir up their brethren to flee from the wrath to come, and
not to rest in an empty profession of religion. Accordingly,
they are now employed in preaching the word of life, dis-
tributing pamphlets, and endeavouring to excite their Chris-
tian brethren to employ the talents committed to their
charge, especially by erecting schools for the instruction of
youth. As the Lord alone can crown their endeavours with
success, and as He has declared that for all the blessings He
bestows on His church and people He will be entreated,
they earnestly request the prayers of the friends of Jesus.
That their object may be misrepresented they have no doubt.
It has already been said they are going out with a design of
making people dissatisfied with their ministers ; but they
can appeal to the great Searcher of hearts that they are
determined in their conversation and preaching to know
nothing but Jesus Christ and Him crucified."^
^ Joxirnal of a Tour through the Northern Counties of Scotland, etc.
"^Missionary Magazine for 1797, p. 335.
52 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Messrs. Haldane and Aikman were accompanied on their
journey, as far as Inverness, by Mr. Joseph Eate. The party
travelled in a light open carriage purchased for the occasion.
They carried with them a large number of religious tracts and
pamphlets printed at their own expense, and fresh supplies
of these were forwarded to them at different stages of their
journey. The tour extended over four months, from 12th
July to 7th November. The first part of the journey
extended from Edinburgh to Inverness, and the places visited
were North Queensferry, Keltic Bridge, Perth, Scone, Coupar-
Angus, Meigle, Glamis, Kirriemuir, Montrose, Bervie, Stone-
haven, Aberdeen, Banff, Cullen, Elgin, Forres, Nairn, Fort-
George, and Inverness. In all these places services were
held, conducted by the evangelists. When in Inverness they
learned that the annual fair would shortly be held in Kirk-
wall, and they decided to visit that place, while it was
arranged that Mr. Eate should remain in Inverness until they
returned homewards. On 11th August Messrs. Haldane and
Aikman sailed from Burghead to Kirkwall, where they had
several meetings, as well as at Stromness, Shapinshay, Eday,
Eendall, Evie, and several other places. On 21st August
they came to Thurso, and held services there and at Wick.
Owing to an accident to Mr. Aikman, they were detained in
Thurso and Wick until 11th October, during which time
the whole of the labour of preaching fell to Mr. Haldane.
Travelling homewards, they preached at Dornoch, Tain,
Milton, Invergordon, Drummond, Dingwall, and Inverness,
where Mr. Eate rejoined them. On 26th October they
held services at Huntly, and continued their work at Aber-
deen, Montrose, Brechin, Forfar, Kirriemuir, Coupar- Angus,
Perth, and Auchterarder, at which place their last meeting
was held on 6th November.
The missionary journey was remarkable in several
respects. The spectacle of two gentlemen — one a retired
West India merchant and the other a retired naval officer —
earnestly engaged in a work which had been regarded as
exclusively that of ministers of religion, and preaching with
as great acceptance and power as any " licensed " preachers,
BEGINNINGS 53
excited very great interest, both by its novelty and by the
exceptional zeal and ability with which it was conducted.
The unconventional methods and arrangements adopted
were also calculated to attract attention, the preachers
wearing the ordinary civilian dress of the time — Mr. Haldane
having a blue coat with front facings and a powdered wig —
and the places of meeting being " chapels, halls, covered
places, or the open air, village greens or market crosses, by
the sea-shore or the river side," where the preachers
addressed audiences sometimes numbering as many as 6000
people. Equally great was the interest created by the
fearless and faithful way in which the preachers denounced
at their evening meetings the defective and false teaching
they had heard from the pulpits in many places of worship
in the morning, while at the same time they frankly and
thankfully acknowledged the faithful preaching of the
Gospel they had heard in other places. But, above all, the
remarkable earnestness and power of the preachers them-
selves, their impressive manner, and the clearness with
which they exhibited the saving truths of the Gospel, pro-
foundly affected their audiences wherever they went. One
minister (Mr. Cleghorn), writing long after the excitement
that had been shown in connection with the visit of the
evangelists had passed away, thus described the impression
produced by the preaching of Mr. Haldane in particular :
" His congregations on week-days, though in the time of
harvest, were numerous, but on the Lord's Day such
congregations were never seen in this place. Many have
spoken to me of the effects of the word on this occasion,
but they have always wanted words to express their views
of them. Some have compared its operation to that of an
electric shock. A solemn silence pervaded the multitude.
Many were seen to shed tears, and when some truths were
expressed sighs were heard throughout the congregation.
Some have said there was an astonishing authority, and a
sort of indescribable evidence attending the word which
they could not resist. The word of God on this occasion
was truly ' quick and powerful' I have been informed by
54 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
others that they heard Mr. Haldaue as if he had been a
messenger sent immediately from God, and thought that
what they heard was addressed to thera individually, and
that they were sometimes afraid lest their names should be
mentioned. In short, the attention of almost every one
was directed to what they called this Gospel. It was indeed
new to most who heard it, both as to the matter and the
manner of delivering it. So generally was the attention
of the people drawn to it that you could hardly find two
conversing together but religion was the subject." ^ This is
but one of many similar testimonies that could be given of
the effect produced by the preaching of the Gospel through-
out the missionary journey. " Multitudes dated their turning
to God from the period of this awakening. Several years
later Mr. Cleghorn publicly named, as within his own
knowledge, in the small town of Wick alone, forty cases in
which there had been a solid work of conversion by the
preaching of James Haldane." " But it is not merely from
such instances that the good done must be estimated. It
was far more visible in the impulse given to the Established
Church and to the Seceders in Scotland. This very circum-
stance may have tended to prevent due acknowledgment of
the services of the labourers, but as they did not look for
human applause, or for a crown of earthly glory, they were
not disappointed."*
^ Lives of Robert and James Haldane, p. 630. ^ Ibid., p. 174. -
CHAPTER VI.
PROGRESS.
The remarkable success of the evangelistic journey in
the north of Scotland convinced Mr. Haldane and Mr.
Aikman, and those who had followed their good work
with increasing interest and sympathy, of the necessity of
having the same kind of work continued on a larger scale.
They had discovered that what they had been tauntingly
reminded of by the Moderate party in the Established
Church, in its opposition to foreign missions, was indeed
too true, that there were enough heathen at home,^
and that there was a loud call for preachers of the Gospel
to be sent to their own countrymen. Very soon after the
completion of the northern tour a number of friends joined
together in instituting what was called " The Society for Pro-
pagating the Gospel at Home." In the first address of the
society the members of it declared that it was not their
design to extend the influence of any sect, but solely to make
known the Gospel of Jesus Christ, in employing itinerants,
schoolmasters, or others ; and they proposed to employ them
only wherever they found they were really needed. It
was one of the principles of the society that no public
collections should be made, nor money taken privately
from among those to whom the Gospel was preached, and
the society undertook to defray the expenses of ministers
engaged in its work. Public subscriptions were received
1 Lives of Robert and James Haldane, p. 125.
55
56 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
for its support, but only to a limited extent and by
far the greater part of the funds required was supplied
by Mr. E. Haldane. The principles and plans of the
society were powerfully advocated by the Eev. George
Cowie ^ of Montrose and other ministers, and notably by
the Eev. Greville Ewing,^ in the pages of the Missionary
Magazine, and also in a sermon which Mr. Ewing preached
in December, 1797, while as yet a minister of the Established
Church, and which much alarmed the Moderates. The
publication of Mr. James Haldane's journal of the tour
through the north greatly added to the interest taken in
the society, while at the same time it became the occasion
for a good deal of opposition being shown to its work.
Early in 1798, Mr. Joseph Eate was employed to itinerate
as an agent of the society in Fife, while Mr. John Cleghorn
and Mr. William Ballantine, who originally belonged to
the Secession Church, and who had studied under Dr. Bogue,
were sent to the north, to labour in those parts of Caithness
where a great awakening had followed the labours of Mr.
Haldane in the previous year. On 14th June, 1798, Mr.
Haldane and Mr. Aikman undertook a missionary journey
through the south of Scotland, travelling by Biggar, Peebles,
Hamilton, Greenock, etc., into Ayrshire and Galloway, and
completing their circuit homewards by Berwick. Large
meetings were addressed in all the places they visited,
and much interest manifested by many who at a later
time testified to the spiritual blessing they had received.
A further and most important development of the home-
missionary enterprise took place in 1798. Members of the
Society for Propagating the Gospel at Home conferred
together regarding a proposal to have a " Tabernacle " in
Edinburgh, on the plan adopted with much success in con-
nection with the labours of the Eev. Mr. Whitefield about
fifty years before. " The general idea affixed to the houses
called Tabernacles is that of large places of worship, where
as great a variety as possible is kept up in the preaching by
employing different ministers, in order to excite and main-
^ See Appendix A.
PROGRESS 57
tain attention to the Gospel, especially in such as are living
in open neglect of religion." -^ The tabernacle scheme was
entered into with characteristic enthusiasm and liberality by
Mr. Eobert Haldane, and on his invitation the Eev, Eowland
Hill of London began preaching in the Circus in Edinburgh,
the intention of Mr. Haldane being that in the event of the
scheme being found workable a larger and permanent build-
ins should be erected. Mr. Hill conducted services in the
Circus in July and August, during which time the place was
crowded by people who were eager listeners to his earnest
preaching. In the intervals between the Sabbaths Mr. Hill
preached to large crowds in Leith, on the Calton Hill (where
as many as 15,000 assembled to hear him), and also at
Crieff, Perth, Kinross and Dundee. He was followed by
many other preachers from England, among whom were Mr.
Bennet of Eomsey, Mr. Parsons of Leeds, Mr. Boden of
Sheffield, Mr. Burder of Coventry, Mr. Slatterie of Chatham,
Mr. Simpson of Buxton, Mr. Taylor of Ossett, Mr. Griffin of
Portsea, and Mr. Jay of Bath.
Other developments of the missionary spirit and enter-
prise took place during the latter half of 1798, during which
several events of great importance took place. On the 16th
June Mr. Eobert Haldane left his estate of Airthrey, having
sold it with the view of devoting his means to the further-
ance of the Gospel. He was led to take this step largely
owing to his desire to carry out the tabernacle scheme,
which was inaugurated by the opening of the Circus as a
place for preaching, his intention being to erect and main-
tain several of these places in the principal towns in
Scotland. Following upon this was Mr. E. Haldane's
scheme for establishing an institution for the education and
training of men for the ministry, the urgent need for which
had been shown in the difficulty found in obtaining preachers
in sufficient number to overtake the work required. Then
followed the resignation of their charges in connection with
the Established Church of the Eev. Greville Ewing of
^ Addresses to the Public concernimj Political Opinions, etc., by R. Haldane,
1800.
58 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Edinburgh and the Eev. William Innes of Stirling, which
had been foreseen for some time, for these ministers had for
a considerable time prior to this indicated their dissatisfaction
with the state of things in the Established Church, and a
desire to have greater freedom of action and closer union
with men of an evangelical and missionary spirit. The last
notable and significant event of the year was the resolution
of a number of brethren in Edinburgh to form themselves
into a Congregational Church, and to invite Mr. James
Haldane to be the first pastor. The church, however, was
not formally constituted until the month of January, 1799,
when 310 persons expressed their desire to join it. Of
these some thirty desired to retain their connection with the
various churches to which they belonged, while seeking to
have occasional fellowship with the new church.
Although this was not the first of the Congregational
churches that came into existence during the closing years
of the century, its formation marks a stage in the develop-
ment of the home-missionary and evangelistic enterprise
which calls for special attention, all the more so because
other churches were soon afterwards formed in similar
circumstances and for the same reasons that led to the
formation of the church in Edinburgh. We have seen how
the spiritual movement which began in 1797 originated in
the desire of several spiritually-awakened men to extend
the blessing of the Gospel to others, and how this was done
in the first instance by means of tract distribution and the
institution of Sabbath schools ; we have also seen how in
the prosecution of this work men like Messrs. Haldane and
Aikman were led to become preachers of the Gospel at a time
when lay-preaching was opposed and discredited ; how, owing
to their success as village preachers in Gilmerton they were
led to prosecute their evangelistic labours on a more extended
scale in their northern missionary journey ; how they and
others were encouraged by the remarkable results of that
work to establish a society for the propagation of the Gospel
at home ; and how out of this grew the " tabernacle "
scheme of providing central places for the preaching of the
PROGRESS 59
Gospel in the midst of large populations. All these were
successive stages of development of the missionary and
evangelistic enterprise on which its original promoters
entered without any idea or expectation of whereunto it
would grow. They were led on step by step, and found
that one part of their work grew out of that which preceded
it, and that they could not do otherwise than they had
done. It may not be quite so obvious that the formation
of a Congregational Church or churches was a necessary or
inevitable development of the movement on which they had
entered. Why, it may be asked, did not the Messrs.
Haldane, Aikman, and others continue to carry on their
work as evangelists, while retaining their connection with
the Established Church to which they belonged ? As yet,
there had been no formal opposition to or denunciation of
their work by ecclesiastical authorities, and they were as
free to prosecute it as they had been at the outset of the
work. Might not such men as the Rev. Greville Ewing and
the Eev. William Innes have remained as parish ministers,
preaching the Gospel to their people and joining in evange-
listic work, and thus tried to have carried on their evangelical
teaching and work inside the Establishment instead of
becoming separatists from it ?
A little consideration of the facts disclosed by the situa-
tion which had been reached in 1797 will show that the
promoters of the movement, which resulted in the adoption
of Congregational principles, felt that they were precluded
from following the course just indicated. In the first place,
Messrs. Haldane and Aikman, at the earlier part of their
missionary work in the north, advised those who had been
converted under their preaching to connect themselves with
one or other of the churches of the places to which they be-
longed ; and in Kirkwall they were advised to join the
Anti-Burgher church, which had an evangelical minister at
the time. But the result was such as to discourage the
repetition of such advice, and it was never afterwards given.
Secondly, for some time prior to the formation of the church
in Edinburgh, those who had been the chief promoters of
60 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
the work of the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel at
Home had been in the actual enjoyment of that close and
sympathetic fellowship with each other which they after-
wards found in larger measure when they came together as
a church. There was, indeed, a large measure of true church -
life among them before a church was formed. Their common
service for Christ in seeking the conversion of souls, their
"fellowship meetings," of which there were many in Edin-
burgh and elsewhere, at which prayer, mutual conference,
and exhortation were the chief exercises ; their friendly and
frequent conversation with each other on the various parts
of Christian work in which they were engaged ; and their
association together in connection with Sabbath school and
tract-distribution work, and in particular with the preaching
and meetings in the Circus — all these enabled the active and
earnest Christian workers to enjoy a very real fellowship
with each other, and to make them desirous of having
it continued without the hindrances they experienced in
connection with the various churches to which they belonged.
For it must be remembered that the friends thus associated
together had not severed their connection with the Estab-
lished and other churches of which they were members ; but
when they passed from the Circus meetings, their prayer
meetings, and their conferences with each other in seeking
to carry on evangelistic work, and came to the churches with
which they were formally connected, the difference was
painfully felt. In the latter they found little sympathy with
their earnest life and active zeal for the spiritual welfare of
men ; they listened to preaching far removed in doctrine and
spirit from that which they had heard from the preachers
in the Circus ; and they found themselves at the Lord's
Table in the company of many who not only made no
profession of genuine godliness, but whose lives were in many
cases a scandal to the Christian name. The absence of real
fellowship in these churches was the chief causeof moving them
to seek a fellowship among themselves and with those who
might join them as believers in Christ. Of this Mr. Aikman
bore testimony when he gave an account of the formation of
PROGRESS 61
the first church in Edinburgh : " The chief principle which
influenced the minds of the brethren who, I believe, consti-
tuted the majority of the small company first associated for
the observance of divine ordinances in the Circus was the
indispensable necessity of the people of God being separated
in religious fellowship from all such societies as permitted
unbelievers to continue in their communion. This was a
yoke under which we had long groaned ; and we hailed with
delight the arrival of that happy day when we first enjoyed
the so much wished-for privilege of separating from an
impure communion, and of uniting exclusively with those
whom it was meet and fit that we should judge to be all the
children of God." ^ Thirdly, it has to be noted that in the
case of the two ministers of the Established Church who
left that body, their separation from it was occasioned by
considerations that left them no other course. Mr. Innes
was led to resign his charge because he felt unable conscien-
tiously to take part in the ordination of a minister whom he
knew to be a profane swearer, although long before that
occasion he had been out of sympathy with the state of
things existing in the Establishment. Mr. Ewing was in
much the same position, and in his sympathy with evan-
gelistic work, and with the aims of those who sought a
spiritual fellowship of believers in Christ, as well as in his
feeling of alienation from the majority of the ministers with
whom he was in ecclesiastical connection, he had for some
time previous to his separation from the Establishment been
prepared for that step. Moreover he, more than any
of his brethren, had been making an independent study
of the New Testament regarding the principles of a Christian
church as therein set forth, and his resignation of the
ministry of the church of which he was pastor did not take
place until he had been convinced that the church-life and
order based on Congregational principles were most in
accordance with the principles and practice of the early
Christian churches and with the teaching of Scripture.
Hence it was that within a few days after his resignation
^ Lives of the Haldanes, p. 217.
62 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Mr. Evving, " who was most familiar with such matters," was
requested to draw up a plan for the government of the
church which the brethren in Edinburgh had resolved to
form. The fact that the " plan " prepared by Mr. Ewing
and adopted by the brethren embraced the leading and
distinctive principles of Congregationalism is a clear
indication that it was not the production of study extending
over the few days that intervened between Mr. Ewing's
resignation and the formation of the new church, but
was the outcome of long and careful examination of
Scripture and of the history of Christian churches in other
ages and other lands. It was announced by Mr. E. Haldane
as follows :
" The form of church government is what is called
Congregational. It is exercised in the presence of the
church itself, by its pastor and office-bearers, and with
the consent of the members, independent of any other
jurisdiction, a form long known and acted upon in
England. A strict discipline also is maintained. The
characters of all persons admitted as members are
particularly examined ; and great numbers have been
rejected, either from ignorance of the Gospel or from not
appearing to maintain a becoming walk and conversation.
The church members are exhorted to watch over each other
in love ; if any be overtaken in a fault he is reproved ; but
if convicted of departing from the faith of the Gospel, of
deliberate immorality, or allowed and continued indulgence
in sin, he is put away, and restored only upon credible
proofs of repentance. Such regulations we believe to be
in accordance with Scripture, and calculated to promote
edification." ^
Mr. James Haldane having been unanimously invited to
become pastor of the new church, was ordained on Sabbath,
3rd February, 1799. As this is the first instance of an
" ordination " in connection with any of the Congregational
churches formed during the closing years of the century,
it may be interesting to give a brief sketch of the proceed-
"^ Lives of the Haldanes, p. 219.
PROGRESS 63
ings, especially as they appear to have been conducted upon
the " plan " recommended by the Eev. Greville Ewiug, who
was the chief adviser and in connection with all matters of
church organisation. The Eev, Mr. Taylor, of Ossett, con-
ducted the opening devotional exercises and preached a
sermon from John xviii. 36. After a hymn had been
given out by Mr. Ewing, the Rev. Mr. Garie, of Perth,
after prayer and a few introductory remarks, asked the
following questions: "(1) As an unconverted ministry is
allowed to be a great evil, will you, sir, favour us with an
account of the dealing of God with your soul ? (2) Will
you inform us what are the circumstances and motives
which have led you to preach the Gospel, and to desire to
engage in the work of the ministry ? (3) Will you favour
us with your views of the leading truths of the Gospel ?
(4) Will you explain your views and purposes respecting
the duties and trials before you in the pastoral office ? "
Mr. Haldane having answered these questions at consider-
able length, Mr. Garie asked the members of the church to
give an account of the steps they had taken in order to
establish a pastoral relation between Mr. Haldane and
themselves.
In reply, Mr. Aikman, on behalf of the church, stated
that it had long been the desire of several serious persons
in the place to enjoy the benefit of Christian fellowship
on a Scriptural plan, and at the same time to avoid that
contracted spirit which would exclude from the pulpit, or
occasional communion, any faithful preacher of the Gospel
or sincere lover of the Lord Jesus ; that some time previous
a number of the members then present had agreed upon
certain regulations which appeared to them agreeable to the
Word of God, and had thereupon formed themselves into a
church, by solemn prayer, giving themselves to the Lord
and to one another, to walk in Christian fellowship and to
observe all the ordinances appointed by Jesus Christ ; and
that they had unanimously chosen Mr. James Haldane, one
of their number, to be their pastor.
Mr. Garie further asked the church if they still adhered
64 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
to their choice of Mr. Haldane, and this having been done
by the members holding up their right hands, Mr. Garie
asked Mr. Haldane whether he would now finally declare
his acceptance of the call. Mr. Haldane having answered
in the affirmative, Mr. Ewing gave out a psalm and Mr.
Garie offered prayer, by which Mr. Haldane was solemnly
set apart to the work of the ministry, and to the pastoral
office in the church. After prayer Mr. Haldane received
the right hand of fellowship, and Mr. Garie gave out a
hymn. This was followed by a sermon from Mr. Ewing,
from 1 Peter v. 1, 4. At the conclusion of the sermon he
addressed the pastor, the church, and the congregation, and
the services concluded by the singing of a hymn. The
/ whole services lasted nearly five hours.^
In pursuance of his " tabernacle " scheme, Mr. Robert
Haldane invited the Rev. Greville Ewing to conduct services
in a building in Glasgow which had formerly been used as
a riding school, in Jamaica Street. It was opened on 28th
July, 1799, by the Rev. Rowland Hill, and a church was
formed on 15th August in the following year. A new
Tabernacle was also erected in Dundee in October, 1800,
and in 1801 a church was formed under the pastoral care
of the Rev. William Innes. In May, 1801, the new
Tabernacle in Edinburgh was opened. All these buildings
were intended mainly as centres of evangelistic enterprise in
large populations, and the formation of the churches that
met in them was rather an outgrowth of the Christian
fellowship of brethren engaged in active evangelistic work
than as the result of any purpose of founding Congregational
churches. This has to be kept in view in order rightly to
understand and estimate the part that the brothers Haldane
had in the origination of these churches. Their plans and
purposes were distinctively of a missionary and evangelistic
character, and they appear to have taken the position of
those who kept in the foreground of their enterprise the
spread of the Gospel among the masses of the people, while
cordially joining those who sought to conjoin a spiritual
1 Lives of the Haldanes, pp. 219-224.
PROGRESS 65
church-life and order with evangelistic effort. The taber-
nacle was to them a place to be used rather as a centre of
missionary enterprise than as a meeting-place for a church.
Indeed, Mr. J. Haldane, at the outset of his ministry in
Edinburgh, was careful to state that the opening of the
Tabernacle was " no separation from the Establishment. It
was merely the opening of another place of worship for
preaching the Gospel without regard to forms of external
arrangement of church-order, and where the pastor and
many of the members showed their catholic spirit by going
to the sacrament in the Established Church. Add to this
that the preaching was addressed almost entirely to the
people of the world." -^ It was this dominating missionary
spirit and purpose that were acknowledged and felt in the
early days of Scottish Congregationalism much more than
the professed character and principles of these churches in
regard to ecclesiastical polity. They were known as the
" Tabernacle " churches, to distinguish them from the Glasite
and Old Scots Independent churches, all of which were Con-
gregational in their principles ; and they were known as the
" Missionary " churches, owing to their aggressive and evan-
gelistic spirit and aims. It was not until the earlier move-
ment of which Messrs. Haldane and Aikman were the chief
leaders had resulted in the formation of many churches that
special attention was given to questions of church-order, and
many were led to emphasise the Scriptural foundation and
authority of Congregationalism. In connection with this
later development of the evangelistic movements that took
place in the closing years of the century the brothers
Haldane cannot be said to have taken any specially active
part. As will be seen later on, the real father of Scottish
Congregationalism of the modern type was the Eev. Greville
Ewing.
1 Lives of the Haldanes, p. 330.
CHAPTER VII.
OPPOSITION.
Opposition to the good work of the Haldanes and those
who worked with them was shown at a very early stage of
the evangelistic movement, in promoting which they took a
leading part. At first it was of a negative and covert kind,
and was shown by ministers and others seeking to prevent
preachers from having the use of places for their meetings,
and by warning the people against them and their teach-
ing. But when the attendance at their meetings became
large, and widespread interest was shown in their preaching,
the various Church courts became alarmed, and took action
of a more direct kind. In 1799 overtures were presented to
the General Assembly of the Established Church from the
Synods of Aberdeen and of Angus and Mearns " respecting
vagrant teachers, Sunday schools, irreligion, and anarchy,"
with the result that " the Assembly unanimously agreed to
the overtures, and prohibited all persons from preaching in
any place under their jurisdiction who were not licensed ; and
also those who are from England, or any other place, and who
had not been first educated and licensed in Scotland." ^ In
addition, two declaratory acts were passed, the one against
" vagrant teachers," and the other against " unauthorised
teachers of Sabbath schools." But the strength and bitter-
ness of the opposition to Sabbath school and evangelistic
work were most conspicuously shown by the issue of a
1 Memoir of Greville Ewing, p. 20-3.
66
OPPOSITION 67
" Pastoral Letter " by the Assembly,^ in which missionary
and itinerant preachers were denounced, and the people
warned against attending their meetings. The letter was
ordered to be read from every pulpit, and along with it
there were circulated copies of a report hostile to Sunday
schools for the use of the ministers and people. Only three
years previous to this the General Assembly had rejected an
overture to the effect " that it is the duty of Christians to
carry the Gospel to the heathen world," and one of the
arguments used against its adoption was that there were
enough heathen at home, and that the Gospel should be
first carried to them ! The " Letter " bears evidence in its
terms that it was intended to stigmatise the evangelistic
movement, not only on the ground that it had schismatic
tendencies, but was part of a political design to overturn
the established institutions, political and religious, of the
country. It was mainly on this ground that the opponents
of the work were not content to resort to ecclesiastical
intimidation of the people, but sought to call in the civil
power to put down " unlicensed " preaching. A measure to
that effect was actually prepared for introduction to Parlia-
ment by the Prime Minister of the day, Mr. Pitt, but
was withheld. There can be little doubt that the action
of the Government of the time was stayed owing to
the issue by Mr. Eobert Haldane of " Addresses to the
public concerning Political Opinions and Plans to pro-
mote Keligion in Scotland," in which he repudiated, on
his own behalf, and those with whom he associated,
any but purely religious objects or designs in the various
movements in which he and others took part. While the
attempt to reach the evangelists by a new repressive law
was given up, various other efforts were made to prevent
them from carrying on their work. The work of the Sabbath
School Society had been specially obnoxious to the ministers
of the EstabKshed Church, for they found that many of the
adult members of their churches were in the habit of
attending the Sabbath evening schools and Hstening to the
1 See Appendix C.
63 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
addresses given by the teachers. In order to ascertain
whether they could not put down this work, the opponents
of the schools sought the opinion of a leading advocate of
the time, the late Mr. Henry Inglis, but his judgment was
entirely unfavourable to any action of the kind, his view
being that the meetings held were entirely legal. Here and
there, however, attempts were made to put down Sabbath
school work by the presbyteries and individuals. In a
parish in Morayshire the presbytery obtained an interdict
from the Sheriff against several Sabbath school teachers,
after having made various other efforts to induce them to
give up their work. But the attempted interference with
the good work of these men not only failed, but resulted in
a remarkable expression of interest and helpful sympathy
with them in their good work ; for during the time the
interdict was pending other teachers travelled some sixteen
miles to take the place of their persecuted brethren and
carry on their work. In another presbytery (in Banffshire)
teachers were summoned to appear before that court and
answer for their misconduct in teaching Sabbath schools,
but on the advice of the Eev. George Cowie, of Huntly,
they refused to appear. In 1880 Messrs. James Haldane
and John Campbell were, at the instance of a landed pro-
prietor, sent to the Sheriff of Argyle, charged with being
vagrant preachers, but were set at liberty by that func-
tionary. The most notable case, however, was that of
M' Arthur vers2ts Campbell, which was decided by the Court
of Session in 1805. Mr. M' Arthur, a preacher at Port-
Bannatyne, Bute, while celebrating divine service, was
violently seized, forced on board a vessel bound for Greenock,
and handed over to a naval captain as a fit person to serve
in the navy. He was speedily removed beyond the juris-
diction of the Scottish courts, detained for five weeks on
board various ships of war, and after suffering much indig-
nity and hardship, was released by the Lords of the
Admiralty. Against this high-handed action Mr. M' Arthur
appealed to the Court of Session, and claimed damages
against his persecutor. The defence was to the effect that
OPPOSITION 69
Mr. M' Arthur was a preacher of " immoral and seditious
doctrines," and further, that the defender, finding that
M'Arthur had formerly been a seafaring man, had, in his
capacity as a justice of the peace, acted properly in handing
him over to the officers of the navy at a time when the
press-gang system was in operation. In deciding the case,
Lord Meadowbank gave judgment in favour of Mr. M'Arthur,
and awarded him £105 as a solatiwm for the wrong he had
suffered, together with the indemnification of expenses in-
curred by him, personal or otherwise, in obtaining his
deliverance, and expenses of process. In giving judgment,
the Lord Ordinary said :
" I am fully aware of the propriety of protecting inferior magistrates
in the fair exercise of their authority, and of discouraging actions of
damages against them founded upon alleged errors in judgment. But,
on the other hand, I never can forget, and I never shall forget while I
sit here, that it is the duty of the judges of the supreme court to
protect the liberty of the subject. Therefore, whenever an action of
damages is brought for any invasion of that liberty it is incumbent on
the magistrate to show that his conduct has been regular, and that
if he has committed any error, it is merely an error of judgment for
which he is not liable. A good deal has been said about the nature of
the pursuer's doctrines, but this I lay entirely out of the question ;
whatever they were they are of no consequence to this cause ; for, (1)
there was no complaint made to the defender as a justice of the peace
on the subject ; (2) there is no evidence that he made any inquiry ; (3)
he had no jurisdiction to take any cognisance of any such offences ; (4)
though he had, I never heard that to serve on board of a man-of-war is
the proper punishment of heresy. It is said that the defender acted
as a justice of the peace — I rather think he acted as a constable. I
cannot conceive on what grounds he acted as a justice of the peace.
Has a justice of the peace any power to commit without warrant,
authority, proof, or investigation of any kind, or any measures of a
legal nature, and, hrevi mamo, to lay hold of a person and send him on
board of a man-of-war? I have no conception that such proceedings
can be justified ; and I therefore think the interlocutor is entirely
right."!
This was among the last attempts to persecute the
preachers by attempted legal measures, and there can be little
! Scottish Congregational Jubilee Services, p. 82.
70 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
doubt that the judgment of the Lord Ordinary had a strongly
deterrent effect on the minds of those who would have put
down the " vagrant preachers," but lacked the power.
There were other instances showing how determined was
the opposition to the preachers and those who sympathised
with them. In the town of Ayr, Messrs. Haldane and
Campbell were forbidden to preach in the open air, and
threatened with imprisonment. In several parts of the
Highlands tenant farmers were evicted from their farms for
receiving the preachers and attending their meetings. In
one notable instance (in Aberfeldy) the school-house in
which the meetings had been held was closed against the
preachers, and they were forced to hold their meetings in
the open air ; but an attempt was made to prevent them
from assembling even there, one of the neighbouring lairds
threatening them with his walking-stick, which, however,
was wrenched from his hands by one of the people, who
defied him to interfere with their right to meet on the
king's highway. The chief leaders in this petty persecution
were the parish ministers. Even those of them who were
favourable to the evangelists so long as they were simply
preachers, and addressed promiscuous gatherings of people,
became very bitter in their opposition when they found them
associating as societies for prayer, or as churches, regarding
all such meetings as tending to draw away the people
from the parochial churches. The following extract from
a letter written by a minister will give an idea of the petty
persecution to which the pastors and churches were exposed:
" We had our trials for attachment to Congregational
principles. So much so that we had to apply to the civil
courts for redress. For example, the names of the children
whom I baptised would not be inserted in the parish
register like others, but were put down in a separate place
under the designation of irregular baptisms, so that my own
children's names are in two distinct parts of the register ;
but I compelled them by the law of the country to put
the names of all I baptised in their proper places. Even a
burying place I could not procure for my family until I
OPPOSITION 71
compelled it in the same way. Further, they tried to break
down our Sabbath schools, especially one in the country
which was in a most flourishing state ; the clergyman
prevailed upon the proprietor to get the person who kept it
turned out of the house, and sent one of the elders and the
ground officer to suppress the school or turn him out. I
had to apply the law here again, and compelled the pro-
prietor, as a Justice of the Peace, to license both the house
and the teacher. Since then there has been no opposition,
further than that we stirred up the kirk folk to begin a
school for themselves to counteract our influence. Thus
you see we had to fight our way step by step ; but no weapon
formed against us prospered."^
The opposition to the preachers was not confined to the
Established Church. At the very outset of the movement
in favour of missions to the heathen in 1796 the General
Associate or Anti-Burgher Synod passed a resolution against
the constitution of missionary societies, composed of
ministers and laymen, and testified against co-operating
with persons in religious matters while, as a church, they
were testifying against their opinions. At a later date
(1798) the same synod showed itself equally opposed to the
missionary work at home, for it " agreed unanimously in
declaring that as lay-preaching has no warrant in the word
of God, and as the synod has always considered it its duty to
testify against promiscuous communion, no person under the
inspection of the Synod can consistently with their principles
attend upon or give countenance to public preaching by any
who are not of our communion. And if any do so they
ought to be dealt with by the judicatories of the church to
bring them to a sense of their offensive conduct." Equal
bigotry was shown by the Cameronian Church in Glasgow,
for when some of its members attended a missionary sermon
preached by Dr. Balfour on behalf of the Glasgow Missionary
Society the Presbytery declared their conduct " sinful and
offensive." The session was instructed to deal with them,
and to endeavour to bring them to a sense of the " sinfulness
^ Scottish Congregational Jubilee Services, p. 82.
72 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
and offensiveness thereof," and to censure them accordingly.
And because they would not submit to the sentence they
were expelled from the denomination ! Even the Eelief
Synod, representing a Presbyterian body which was
originated through the labours and testimony of an Inde-
pendent minister — the Eev. Thomas Gillespie — and which
for many years after its origin was composed of ministers
and members whose liberal spirit contrasted with the
narrowness of the other Presbyterian denominations, joined
in the denunciation of the preachers, and in particular of lay
preaching. In 1798 it passed the following resolution :
" That no minister belonging to this body shall give or
allow his pulpit to be given to any person who has not
attended a regular course of philosophy and divinity in some
of the universities of the nation, and who has not been
regularly licensed to preach the Gospel."^
It was in the north of Scotland where the opposition to
the work of the preachers was found most pronounced, for
it was in that part of the kingdom that the greatest interest
had been shown in their work. " The missionary ministers
in their preaching tours drew around them immense crowds
and before the close of 1799 nearly 30,000 or 40,000 tracts
had been circulated, and nearly 40 catechists were travelling
throughout the length and breadth of the land. The whole
of the north was thrown into a blaze. The clergy complained
that the world was going out of its place, and the old land-
marks of things, both civil and sacred, were fast disappearing.
. . The ' missionaries,' as they were called, were found
preaching in every village and every Highland glen, and in
every locality they had their schools and lay agency which
trenched on Presbyterian order and clerical superintendence.
Church courts, both dissenting and Established, took the
alarm, and brought their antagonistic power and influence to
bear on them.""
It is right that a discriminating judgment should be
formed as to the nature and causes of this widespread
^ Struthers' History of the Relief Church, pp. 55, 56.
2/6irf., p. 403.
OPPOSITION 73
opposition to the " missionary " preachers and their work.
It could not have arisen from any well-founded objection
to the doctrine of the preachers, for all of them held
and taught the doctrines of the Westminster Confession of
Faith, and none of them was ever charged with heresy.
Nor was the opposition called forth on account of the
preaching of the Gospel, for even the Moderates of the
time refrained from condemning the preachers on this
ground, however distasteful to them may have been their
evangelical teaching ; and the willingness of the Established
Church ministers to tolerate evangelical doctrine had been
shown in the welcome that many of them had given to
the Rev. George Whitefield some fifty years before the
"missionaries" appeared. The main ground of opposition
was lay preaching. A hundred years ago the function
of preachers was regarded as the exclusive right and
privilege of licensed or ordained ministers, and was as
jealously guarded as were the special privileges of the
trades guilds of the time. Every minister felt bound to
protect his position and influence as the official religious
teacher of his congregation or parish from being encroached
upon by preachers who had not had the long training and
preparation which were required of licensed preachers,
and feared the disturbing effect on his influence with his
people if they discovered that the unlicensed preacher
should prove as acceptable to them as those who were
licensed. Further, lay preaching was regarded with aversion
because it tended to interfere with presbyterial order, as
was feared would be the case if preachers ignored the
authority and superintendence of the church courts. There
has also to be taken into account the fact that every
one of the religious bodies of the time had a special
"testimony" of its own to defend, and recognised it as
a duty to oppose and denounce all who did not agree
with it. The mere fact of the "missionaries" having a
message of their own, and of having adopted new methods
of delivering it, was sufficient to array against them all
the official representatives of the various sects of the time,
74 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
and they opposed the new men and the new ways as
strenuously as they opposed each other.
The narrow and exclusive spirit which prevailed,
especially in the Established Church, was shown in the
opposition by its ministers not only to the lay preachers, but
also to the ministers of the Gospel who came "from Eng-
land " to preach in the Circus and other places. All who
came from that country, " or any other place," who had
not been educated and licensed in Scotland, were prohibited
from preaching in Scotland. On this the Kev. Eowland
Hill thus caustically animadverted : " Such is the wisdom
of the Church of Scotland, that the question with them
respecting learning is, not if he has it, but where he got
it ; no matter for the thing, the flace is all ; the learning
of the most learned is nothing if not procured at a learned
place ; and I will venture to assert as a proof of this, that
many went after it to the right place and never got it,
and yet were sure to get the living whenever presented." ^
This bigoted spirit will appear the less surprising if only
it be remembered that the same spirit was manifested by
the various sects towards each other ; for it was a time
when mutual excommunication was exercised all round,
and the experience of the lay-preachers and the ministers
" from England " differed from that of the several religious
sects which had already passed under the ban of those who
did not agree with them only in this, that they did not
attempt a recriminatory excommunication of those who
had cast them out.
It is pleasant to record that in the case of the Relief
Synod their "illiberal act was in 1811 allowed to drop out
of their code of regulations as something of which they
were ashamed." ^ A longer time had to elapse before the
Established Church found itself prepared to recall its perse-
cuting and bigoted acts of 1799. On the eve of the
"Disruption" (in 1842), the act against "vagrant teachers"
1 Rowland Hill's Journal Through the North of England and parts of
Scotland.
2 History of Rdief Church, p. 405.
OPPOSITION 75
and " unauthorised teachers of Sabbath schools " was re-
scinded by the unanimous vote of the General Assembly.
Dr. Cunningham spoke of the act as " eminently discreditable
to the Church of Scotland." He said it had been " passed
for temporary purposes, and upon motives and grounds
which, he believed, were now regarded by a great majority
of the Church of Scotland as of the most erroneous and
improper kind, and amounting to nothing less than hatred
to the cause of evangelical truth." Dr. Guthrie declared
that he regarded the act of 1799 "as one of the blackest
acts the Church of Scotland ever passed. The act was
passed, not to exclude heresy from our pulpits, but to
exclude truth." Dr. Candlish said that " it was notorious
that that act was passed for the very purpose of barring
from the pulpits of the Church men whom it would have
been an honour to any church to employ in preaching the
unsearchable riches of Christ." ^ Gratifying as this some-
what belated action was to all lovers of truth and liberty, it
has to be recorded with regret that after the " Disruption "
the old act of 1799 was re-enacted,^ clearly indicating that
the narrow and repressive spirit of the Moderates of
former days still found place in the Established Church.
1 Lives of the Haldanes, p. 236. ^ m^i^^ 237.
CHAPTER VIII.
CONTROVERSY AND DIVISION.
It has already been noted that the adoption of the principles
and methods of the Congregational system of church-polity
by the churches that were the fruits of the evangelistic
movement of the closing years of the century was not the
outcome of any pre-arranged plan or purpose in favour of
that system in preference to any other, but arose from the
necessities of the situation in which those who afterwards
became members of these churches found themselves. Had
they been able, with a good conscience, to retain their
connection with the various Presbyterian churches to which
they belonged they would not have sought to form a new
connection. But the experience they had had during the
time when the spiritual work of which they themselves
were the first-fruits was going on convinced them that the
continuance of their old church-connections was imprac-
ticable, and for two reasons mainly. In the first place,
they all desired a spiritual fellowship with those who were
confessing believers in Jesus Christ, and they believed that,
according to the teaching of the New Testament, only such
persons should be members of a Christian church ; but they
found the promiscuous communion which obtained in the
churches to which they belonged, and the known un-
willingness of the ministers and office-bearers of these
churches to introduce any change in this respect, shut out
from them any hope of enjoying the purer fellowship they
76
CONTROVERSY AND DIVISION 77
desired and which they felt bound to seek. Severance from
their old church-connections was thus forced upon them of
necessity, and not of choice. In the second place, they
found so many hindrances to the spiritual work in which
they had been engaged on the part of ministers and church-
courts, and owing to the narrow and restrictive rules of the
Presbyterian system, that they felt bound to seek a larger
Christian liberty in church-life and work than they could
find in the churches of that connection. While there
were other considerations of a minor kind that moved
them to separate from Presbyterian churches and to form
new churches, these were the two main principles and aims
by which they were guided — that is to say, the principle
that the churches of Christ should be composed of believers
in Christ, and that every church should be free to manage
its own affairs in accordance with the teaching of Scripture.
And these have been the outstanding principles of Congre-
gational polity throughout its history. It is right and
important to keep in view this feature of the rise of the
later Independency in Scotland, in order to show that it
was not the result of a sectarian propagaudism or an im-
portation of the Conoregationalism which had for Ions
existed in England. Scottish Congregationalism was from
the first of native growth, in the sense that its principles
were adopted of necessity and spontaneously in order to
give effect to the spiritual convictions and aspirations of
men who had been spiritually quickened, and to whom
spirituality and freedom of church-life and activity had
become a necessity. The mere name " Congregationalism "
was of no account ; the original promoters of the evan-
gelistic movement would have adopted any other name if
they had found it accurately implied their adherence to the
principles for which they contended. It was adopted
because it was broadly distinctive of the principle of the
affairs of the church being in the hands of the members of
the church or congregation, as distinguished from the
Presbyterian system, by which they are in the hands of the
presbyters or elders.
78 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
While all the early churches in Scotland sought to give
effect to the two leading principles which have been noted,
they showed their desire to adhere as closely as possible to
the customs and usage of their former church connections.
They retained the times of meeting and the order of public
worship with little or no change, and casual hearers could
find little difference in this respect between the worship in
a Presbyterian and Congregational Church. The only
exceptions to this were in regard to the observance of the
Lord's Supper and the " weekly meeting." From the first
all the Congregational Churches, with the exception of a few
in Aberdeen and the north, observed the Lord's Supper on
the first day of the week, as part of the usual morning
service ; and this became a mark of distinction between
them and the Presbyterians, who observed it only once or
twice a year. The weekly observance of this ordinance
appears to have been the result of the teaching of the Eev.
Greville Ewing, who strongly recommended it as part of the
" plan " on which the first Congregational Church in Edin-
burgh was formed, on the ground that it was the example
given by the apostolic churches, as well as being for
edification. The adoption of this practice is proof of the
determination of the early churches to regulate their
practice in church-life and order in accordance with what
they believed to be the teaching of Scripture, and not merely
to follow the example of other Congregational Churches in
England, among whom the practice was to observe the
Lord's. Supper once a month. At the same time there
was a considerate recognition of the fact that some of
those who cordially were in sympathy with the views of
church-life and order of the Congregational Churches were
not prepared for such a large departure from their former
practice in regard to the Communion as its weekly obser-
vance. Pteferring to the introduction of this practice into
his own church, Mr. Ewing said, " In regard to our original
principle of weekly communion I said that I thought it my
duty, and quoted what I conceived to be Scripture evidence
of it ; but I added that if all were not of that opinion it
CONTROVERSY AND DIVISION 79
would satisfy me if they consented to it as lawful, if they
allowed there was no law against it. And one of the
reasons for admitting occasional communicants (a practice
which, 1 bless God, we have never abandoned) was that we
wished to receive those whom we believed to be lovers of
Christ whenever they desired it, though they might not feel
at liberty to practice weekly communion at all."^ But
while this wise and liberal course was taken with regard to
all who might not, at a time of change in regard to
the frequency of observance of the communion, be prepared
to fall in with the views of most of the churches, in course
of time the weekly observance of it came to be almost
universal among them.
The institution of the " weekly meeting " can hardly be
said to have been an innovation on Presbyterian practice,
but rather a revival of the practice of the earlier days of
Presbyterians in Scotland, when this meeting was one of its
most helpful institutions. But in later times it had either
been given up, or had become a formal service of " preaching."
The change introduced by the Independents was in making
it the church-meeting, at which church business was trans-
acted, along with appropriate devotional exercises. Strange
to say, it was in connection with the institution of the
weekly meeting that the first serious trouble arose among
the new churches, and the unwitting cause of it was the
Eev. Greville Ewing.
On the occasion of the formation of the church in Glasgow
of which Mr. Ewing was the first pastor, a few " Eules of
Church-government " drawn up by him were adopted by the
church for guidance in the management of its affairs. One
of these was to the effect that " besides the ordinary public
worship of the Lord's Day there shall be a church-meeting
weekly for the purpose of social worship, discipline, and
mutual edification." The " discipline " was confined to a
meeting of the members alone, after the other hearers had
withdrawn. The " social worship " consisted of the usual
exercises at a prayer-meeting. The " mutual edification "
^ Memoir of Greville Ewing, p. 238.
80 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
was promoted by " exhortation," and was conducted in the
following manner. The New Testament was regularly gone
through, and hence everyone knew beforehand the passage
to be considered on any particular evening. The pastor,
first of all, was accustomed to give a short explanation of
the passage, and then invited any of the brethren to make
remarks. If anyone spoke, it was left to the pastor to
decide whether to ask a second. In either case, or if no
one was prepared to exhort, the pastor himself spoke on the
passage so long as time permitted. The object of this
arrangement was that there might be a " fellowship meeting
on a large scale," to which Mr. Ewing himself was favourable.
But, with considerate and liberal regard to the views of
those who were not prepared to have mutual exhortation
as part of the ordinary service on the first day of the week,
Mr. Ewing sought to find a place for it at the weekly meet-
ing, in the hope that no one would object to this. Now,
this exercise of " exhortation " was by no means new in
Scotland, and it was practised in many places in England.
In the early days of the Scotch Eeformation John Knox had
recommended it at the weekly meetings then held, and it
had been practised by the Glasite and Old Scots Independent
churches and also by the Old Scotch Baptist churches. Its
success or otherwise as a means of edification had been
found to depend largely on the wisdom and discretion of the
pastor or leader of the meeting, and on the number of
persons present at the meeting who might be relied on to
speak to edification. The first pastors of the Congregational
churches were quite aware of the danger of introducing
confusion into meetings by throwing open the exercise of
exhortation to all who might wish to engage in it ; but such
men as Mr. Ewing believed that the benefit likely to be
derived from the practice was such as to justify churches in
adopting it, and they were all the more in favour of it owing
to their belief that it was in accordance with the example
of the apostolic churches.
Had all others been content to give the exercise the
modest place given to it at the weekly meeting probably no
CONTROVERSY AND DIVISION 81
harm would have followed, and any evils arising from it
might have cured themselves, as they have done in churches
which have given it up solely on the ground that it has
been found inexpedient to adhere to it as a stated practice.
But shortly after the publication of Mr. Ewing's " Rules of
Church-government," Mr. James Haldane, who had for some
time been studying the subject, published an essay on
" Views of Social Worship of the First Churches," etc., in
which, while agreeing with the views of Mr. Ewing, he
advocated the adoption of the practice which Mr. Ewing
sought to avoid in order to keep clear of the risks of possible
division which he feared might accompany it, viz., the
holding of the " fellowship meeting " as part of the regular
worship on the Lord's Day, at which " exhortation " by
members was advocated. It is due to Mr. Haldane's
memory to say that in advocating these views he had no
desire to have them " prematurely forced into practice at the
risk of fomenting division." He desired to state his own
convictions and then leave them to work their way. But
his brother Mr. Robert Haldane, who shared his views, was
not prepared to take this moderate course. He at once
began to advocate them with characteristic keenness, and he
made a journey to England where he advocated his views
of " social worship," and used every opportunity of putting
them into practice.
The practice of having exhortation as a part of the
services on the Lord's Day was not the only innovation
introduced among the churches. Along with that it was
held that " discipline " of offending members should be on
the Lord's Day, and in presence of the members of the
church. Other questions were agitated — such as whether
the ordinances of the Gospel should be supported by the
members of the church alone, and not by public contribution
on Sabbath; whether the Lord's Supper may be observed
without a pastor, and other questions of the kind, in
connection with all of which it became evident that
the brethren were striving after an ideal of church-life
and practice based as closely as possible upon an exact
F
82 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
imitation of the supposed practices of the primitive churches.
But the peace of the churches was disturbed chiefly by
the publication of a " Treatise on the Elder's Office " by the
Rev. William Ballantine of Elgin in 1807, who advocated
a " plurality of elders " in each church. His views were
caught up with characteristic eagerness by Mr. Robert
Haldane, who strongly supported them. In addition to
the evil effects of discussion and division in connection with
this question and that regarding mutual exhortation, there
arose a feeling of disregard and even contempt for the
office of the regular ministry of the Divine Word by pastors
and teachers who had received a theological education.
This feeling was fostered by Mr. Ballantine and others in
pamphlets in which a proposal by the Rev. Mr. Ewing for
the institution of a theological academy for the training of
young men for the ministry was vehemently opposed as
unscriptural and uncalled for. In short, many persons
belonging to the churches had adopted views and practices
now well known in connection with Plymouth Brethrenism,
and with the like divisive effects on the churches. The
trouble from which the churches had been suffering for
some years came to a head by the adoption on the part of
Mr. James Haldane of Baptist views, and the advocacy
of these by himself and his brother. The latter, who had
built several of the places of worship occupied by the
Congregational churches, and had given loans of money to
aid in the erection of others, felt it his duty to call upon
those who did not agree with his views to vacate the
buildings and pay up the loans he had made, and this
placed many of them in serious financial difficulty. It is
due to Mr. Haldane to say, however, that in several'
instances he acted considerately and liberally towards those
in financial trouble, in some cases remitting part of their
debt and in others making the terms of repayment as easy
as possible. " The new notions spread over most of the
churches in the connection, and contention, strife of words,
jealousies, and divisions followed, of which none but such
as passed through the painful scenes of those days can have
CONTROVERSY AND DIVISION 83
any adequate idea. Many stumbling blocks were laid in the
way both of Christians and unbelievers. The occurrences
in question, while they embarrassed and weakened the
churches, exposed them also to the triumph and sneers of
adversaries, while at the same time much odium was brought
on every attempt to follow out scriptural fellowship. Many
of the churches were poor, and if they had hitherto been
unable to support their pastors much less were they able
to do so now that they were divided in sentiment and
fewer in number. The consequences were that some of
the pastors retired from their work, others who remained
at their posts betook themselves to teaching or other
occupations, whilst others continued to labour with no other
aid than the slender pittance which their flocks could give.
This greatly marred their usefulness both in the church and
in the world, and consequently weakened and discouraged
those who continued steadfast to their principles as Con-
cjrecfatioualists." ^
Referring to this time of trouble among the young
churches in the early part of the century. Dr. Lindsay
Alexander thus wrote :
" It had been the misfortune of the Congregationalists in
Scotland to start with the assumption of two principles
which are amply sufficient to set all Christendom by the
ears should they ever come to be universally adopted. One
of these is, that Christians are religiously bound to conform
their ecclesiastical usages in the minutest particulars and
under all circumstances to the practice, or what is supposed
to have been the practice, of the primitive churches ; the
other is, that it is the imperative duty of every man who
has embraced an opinion to make use of all means in his
power to bring everybody else over to that opinion. The
natural consequence of adopting and holding such principles
is to make men contend, and contend incessantly, about
forms and other matters of equally minor importance — to
take tithe of anise and mint and cummin — and to substitute
for a religion of great and noble principles a religion
1 Kinniburgh's MSS.
84 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
bristling all over with fretful minutiae, each of which
must at all hazards be swallowed by every one who would
worthily retain the Christian name. Would that such
principles had no longer any place among the Christians of
this country ! I see not what effect they have, except to
enable every denomination of Christians to prove every
other wrong without proving itself right (for where is the
existing body which is in all points conformed to primitive
usage ?) and at the same time to pour into the healing
waters of the sanctuary the bitter streams of strife and
debate. If we have embraced the great principles of faith
and duty which the apostles taught and on which they
uniformly acted, what more do we gain by imitating step
by step their peculiar modes and customs of action, many of
which were accommodated to the peculiar features of that
state of society in which they found themselves, and some
of which appear to have varied according to circumstances ?
... I confess it is with a feeling of shame and mortifica-
tion that I look back to the controversies which divided
the Congregationalists of Scotland at the time of which I
am now writing. Whether collections should be made at
the church door on Sabbath ; whether the Lord's Supper
should be observed by the church without elders ; whether
thjat ordinance should be attended to once a week or once a
month ; whether the mutual exhortation of the brethren, by
means of public speaking, be not a binding duty ; whether a
plurality of elders be not imperative ; whether church-
discipline should not be exercised only on Sabbath ? — these,
and such as these, were the weighty questions for which the
peace of the churches was disturbed and their usefulness
marred through the excessive, though I believe sincere and
conscientious, zeal of some of their pastors and members.
It is probable, however, that the diffe;i'ences arising out of
these worthless controversies might have been amicably
settled had not the greater question of baptism supervened
to strengthen and exacerbate the fever which was already
sufficiently hot. Here were points on which at least it is
important that a clear and conscientious opinion should be
CONTROVERSY AND DIVISION 85
formed : whether they be such as to justify controversy
amongst the followers of Christ is a question on which one
may be permitted to doubt," ^
One striking circumstance in connection with the
disasters that befel the churches in the early part of the
century was that nearly all the questions that led to
division among them had previously arisen among the
Glasite and Old Scots Independent churches, and with
the like painful results : but although most of the members
of the early Congregational churches were aware of the fate
of the older Independent churches, most of which were at
the time in a state of decay owing to their having been rent
by divisions on minor questions, they ignored the warning
given by their history. But even in our own time we find
the same error repeated, for notwithstanding the lessons that
have come from the past as to the unwisdom and danger of
giving undue prominence to matters of minor importance in
connection with religion, the old controversies still go on,
and professing Christians are divided one against the other
on points that do not enter into the essence of a vital
Christian faith. " Brethrenism " is the historical successor
of the party that broke up the unity of our churches after
some ten years of peace and prosperity ; and something like
Brethrenism might have displaced Congregationalism but
for the spirit and wise teaching and guidance of a few able
and earnest Christian men, under whom the weakened and
scattered churches were led into ways of Christian sober-
mindedness and intelligent application of Congregational
principles.
^ Memoirs of the Rev. John Watson, p. 97.
CHAPTER IX.
RESETTLEMENT.
The dissensions and divisions among the churches in 1807
brought trouble to them in two ways. In the first place,
individual churches were greatly weakened by the loss of
members who left them owing to the adoption of Baptist
views, and in the second place, the pecuniary help given to
many of them by Mr. R. Haldane ceased when he became a
Baptist. Those of them that survived this double blow
maintained the ordinances of the Gospel only with the
greatest difficulty. None of the pastors had ever had more
than a very limited income, and when all outside aid ceased
and the membership was reduced, their circumstances
became very straitened indeed. "There were honoured
servants of Christ who brought up a young family amidst
the inconveniences of an earthen floor, affected by every
change of weather, or saw (at least for once in their ex-
perience) their last morsel of food consumed before they
were able to satisfy the anxious inquiries of their children
whence the next supply was to come."^ It was the
knowledge of personal and family distress of this kind
which was felt in many a pastor's home that moved those
of the pastors and members of churches who were in more
favourable circumstances to anxiously consider what plan to
adopt in order to relieve their sorely- tried brethren. Fore-
most among those who had given careful consideration to
^ Memoir of Greville Eimng, p. 393.
86
RESETTLEMENT 87
the whole subject was the Eev. Greville Ewing, and although
the method ultimately adopted cannot be said to have been
devised by him, there can be little doubt that it was largely
owing tc his wise counsel and sympathetic help that it
became a success. How a combined effort on behalf of the
poorer churches and pastors came to be made may be told
in the words of the biographer of the first secretary of the
Congregational Union of Scotland : In the neighbourhood of
Musselburgh
" A few Christian friends were strolling one evening in
the month of September, 1812, enjoying the beauties of
nature and the pleasures of Christian intercourse. The
company consisted of Mr, Arthur, late pastor of the Congre-
gational church, Dalkeith ; Messrs. Eae and Leyden of the
same church, Mr. Watson, and Mr. William Tait, one of
the deacons of the church in Musselburgh. Deeply interested
in the state of the churches with which they were con-
nected, their conversation turned upon the prospects that
lay before these churches ; and perhaps the approaching
shadows of evening deepening the already sombre tints of
autumn on the surrounding scenery somewhat predisposed
their minds towards desponding views. At length Mr. Tait
— one of those sound-hearted and happy Christians from
whose nature despondency is altogether alien — exclaimed,
' What is to prevent the churches forming a union for
mutual support, whereby the strong may help the weak?'
' The very thing, my dear friend,' exclaimed Mr. Arthur,
with his usual quickness, ' the very thing ! Come let us
talk it over.' Mr. Tait accordingly stated what had occurred
to his own mind in regard to this matter, and the friends
eagerly discussed his suggestions until the shades of night
warned them to seek their homes. Before they separated,
however, it was agreed that Mr. Tait should bring forth his
plan at an association meeting which was to be held at
Dalkeith in the course of the following week."^
The meeting was held on the 9th September, and was
attended by Messrs. Payne, Edinburgh ; Pullar, Leith ;
^ Memoir of Bev. John Watson, p. 103.
88 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Eitchie, Kirkliston ; Orme, Perth ; Watson and Arthur,
Dalkeith and Musselburgh, pastors ; along with Messrs.
Leyden, Forbes, Eae, and Mackie, members of the Dalkeith
church, and Mr. Tait. The scheme was fully discussed, and
before the meeting separated a circular was drawn up to be
sent to the churches, and Messrs. Payne and Watson were
appointed to get it printed without delay. In this circular
the plan of the proposed union was sketched, its importance
urged upon the churches, and their advice craved. It was
also agreed to summon a general meeting to be held in
Edinburgh on the first Wednesday of the following Nov-
ember. The attendance at this meeting of friends from all
parts of the country was highly gratifying, and equally so
was the spirit of unity and zeal which prevailed. After
careful deliberation the plan of the society was agreed upon,
a committee and office-bearers appointed for the first year,
and an address to the churches drawn up, which was after-
wards printed and circulated. The object of the union of
churches — or Congregational Union of Scotland, as it was
designated — was " the relief of Congregational churches in
Scotland, united in the faith and hope of the Gospel, who,
from their poverty, the fewness of their numbers, or
from debt upon their places of worship, are unable to
provide for the ministration of the Word of God in that
way which would tend most to their own edification,
and the eternal happiness of those around them." Every
church (to derive any benefit from the Union) was
expected to make an annual contribution to its funds,
" the common stock of the whole, from which those who
need may receive again, according to its fulness and
their necessities."
The subsequent history of the Congregational Union
bears ample testimony to the wisdom with which it was
originated, and to the large measure in which it secured the
aims of its promoters. These aims were twofold — first, to
aid churches already in existence so as to enable them to
provide for the ministration of the Word of God with
greater comfort and efficiency than they were able to do
RESETTLEMENT 89
while hampered for lack of material support ; and, secondly,
to enable them and their pastors to carry on the home-
mission and evangelistic work in which they had hitherto
been engaged, and which also had been hindered by the
pecuniary difficulties that had overtaken them. It must be
remembered that the churches were from the first evan-
gelistic agencies in a sense which the altered state of thing's
that now obtains among Congregational churches makes it
somewhat difficult for us now to understand. When the
Society for the Propagation of the Gospel at Home was
instituted the employment of itinerant evangelists and
preachers was mainly contemplated ; but when, as the result
of the labours of these men, churches arose in many parts of
the country, they chose as pastors men who had formerly
been agents of the Society, and who continued their evan-
gelistic and itinerant work while ministering to their
churches as pastors. Though their position and relation
to the Society were somewhat changed, their work as evan-
gelists was continued in the same spirit and according to
the same methods as before. The support given them by
the Union was therefore intended to be to aid and encourage
them in their work as pastor-evangelists, and not simply to
enable them to carry on their work as pastors of churches
within the limits of any town or village in which the
church might be situated. In the words of the prospectus
of the Union, aid was given to the churches not only to
enable them to minister " to their own edification," but also
" to the eternal happiness of those around them." In this
way the work of the Society for the Propagation of the
Gospel at Home was continued by the Union, and there was
added to it the work of relieving churches and pastors from
the pecuniary difficulties that had arisen owing to the
troubles that had fallen upon them in 1807. So prominent
was this feature of the home-mission work aided by the
Union that anyone reading its early reports containing
accounts of the labours of pastors aided by its funds would
be led to regard it rather as a society for the evangelisation
of the people of Scotland than as a church-aid society.
90 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Every pastor was regarded as an evangelist, and every
church as a home-mission agency.
In addition to the difficulties that had to be met by the
promoters of the Union at a time when the troubles caused
by recent dissensions were still keenly felt, others arose
from objections to the scheme that were made by some
who regarded it with doubt, and hesitated to give it their
support. Their objections were chiefly two. In the first
place, some objected because the Union was not based on a
declaration of religious beliefs, so that it might be known
what were the views of those on whose behalf the Union
was instituted. Had the Union been designed to be an
ecclesiastical organisation bringing the churches under
certain obligations to each other, or to some central
authority, or to adhere to some doctrinal creed, no doubt
this objection would have been well-founded. But there
was no such design in view. All that was contemplated
was to afford aid to pastors and churches engaged in
Christian work well known and fully approved by the
supporters of the Union, and to enable them to carry on
this work without the hindrances to it that had arisen owing
to their poverty. Moreover, any formal agreement as to
doctrine was the less necessaiy, owing to the unanimity of
the pastors and churches in their religious beliefs. At no
time in the history of the churches had there been a
common religious faith so clear and pronounced as at this
time, nor has there been since. The leaven of Glasiteism
and Sandemauianism that had been felt in the very early
days of the churches, though only in a mild form, had now
been quite purged out, while the divisions as to " mutual
exhortation," plurality of elders, and baptism had passed
away by the secession of those who held these views ; so
that any declaration of religious beliefs as a basis of the
Union was felt to be unnecessary. In the second place,
some objected to the Union on the ground that such an
institution was incompatible with the independence of the
churches. It was natural enough that some fear of this
kind should exist ; for the experience of pastors and
RESETTLEMENT 91
churches in the early years of their history had shown them
the danger of being dependent on the aid of one or two
men, and the trouble that followed the withdrawal of their
support was warning enough against repeating any mistake
of that kind. But the promoters of the Union were able to
point to the fact that the churches aided by the Union
were also among its supporters, and that it was, to a large
extent, a combination for mutual support. Moreover, it
was distinctly intimated that the committee of the Union,
in administering its funds, were in no way to interfere with
the independence of any aided church, but that their sole
function was to inquire into the circumstances of churches
applying for aid, and to vote grants according to their
judgment as to the needs of the churches and the amount
of aid the funds would warrant them giving.
One thing was made very clear at the outset, and that
was that in originating the Union its promoters never
thought of making it a denominational institution, in the
sense that it should be inclusive of or representative of all
Congreo-ational churches in Scotland. It was an institution,
not comprehending them, but belonging to such of them as
chose to join it. As a matter of fact, several churches did
not join it for some years after it was started, and there has
never been a time in the history of the Scottish Congrega-
tional churches in which some churches of that order have
not been outside the Union. The need for the Union
arose, not from any desire to give a denominational unity or
standing to the churches, but to meet a " present distress,"
a distress which it was conceivable might pass away by all
the churches becoming able to carry on their work without
extraneous aid, in which case the Union would, ipso facto,
cease to be required, and therefore cease to exist. This
remark applies solely to the constitution and aims of the
Union at its origin, and for many years thereafter ; it will
require some modification, if regard be had to some of
its later developments
The effects of the institution of the Union became
speedily manifest. Many pastors who had been compelled
92 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
to resort to secular work for support were enabled, through
the help given by the Union, to give their undivided care
to their pastoral and evangelistic work, and several of the
churches were preserved from the extinction that threatened
them, owing to the withdrawal of the support they had
formerly received from the brothers Haldane. Eighty-
five churches had been formed between 1798 and 1807, but
this number had been greatly reduced by the secessions that
took place in the latter year. Fifty-five churches joined the
Union in 1813, and this number was afterwards increased
by the addition of others that had stood aloof for a time.
In the course of a few years the number of churches con-
nected with the Union reached about one hundred, and at a
later period exceeded that number; but the number never
much exceeded or fell below that figure in any one year
of the history of the Union until 1896.
For many years the supporters of the Union closely
adhered to the distinctive objects for the promotion of which
it was formed, viz., to afford aid to churches and pastors
in maintaining the ordinances of the Gospel and in carrying
on evangelistic work in various parts of the country. As
can be easily understood, the meetings of brethren from
all parts of the country once a year to hear the reports
of the committee and to transact the business of the Union
became an occasion of pleasant brotherly intercourse and
Christian fellowship. " If no other benefit had accrued to
the churches than the realisation of their fellowship pro-
moted on these occasions, the spirit of sympathy and prayer
excited and diffused through the multitudes of hearts and
households for self-denying brethren and perishing souls, the
formation of the Union would not have been in vain." ^ To
the brethren in remote parts of the kingdom the annual
meetings of the Union became the outstanding event of the
year, while it became an occasion of happy social intercourse
between them and ministers and members of churches in
the towns in which the meetings were held, and where
they were heartily welcomed and hospitably entertained.
1 Memoir of Greville Ewing, p. 395.
RESETTLEMENT 93
No annual gathering was allowed to pass without one or
more of the ministers from the country districts being
invited to address the meetings, and to tell the story of his
work in the district in which he laboured, and these
addresses served to keep alive a feeling of personal interest
in each of the good men and his work. Nor was a response
wanting on the part of the pastors of town and city
churches, for many of them — such as Mr. Ewing, Dr. Ward-
law, and others — visited the various churches in the north
and other parts of the kingdom, moved not only by their
desire to promote the work of the Union, but by the desire
to renew the fellowship with brethren whom they had been
led to respect and love for their work's sake, and to
encourage them in it. Such an interchange of visits and
intercourse had the happiest effect on the churches of the
Union, and tended to knit them together in the best of
Christian bonds — that of brotherly fellowship with each
other and common service for Christ.
Notwithstanding the practical unanimity in regard to all
the essential doctrines of the Christian faith which prevailed
among the churches, and consequently the needlessness of
any formal declaration of their faith and order, Presbyterians
found it difficult to understand how a body of churches could
be united except by their subscription to some doctrinal
confession, by which the orthodoxy of those in the Union
could be assured, and heretics kept out or cast out. They
found it equally difficult to understand how a religious body
could have its affairs managed without some such authority
as resided in church-courts. Hence two charges were made
against the churches of the Union, the one that their doctrine
was of doubtful orthodoxy, and the other that the Union
was virtually a church- court under another name. To the
one charge the members of the Union were able to reply by
appealing to the known teaching and religious faith common
in all their pastors and churches, and which had never been
seriously called in question. It might have been well had
they dealt in the same way with the other charge — that of
being Presbyterians in disguise. They could have appealed
94 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
to the reports given of the functions and work of the Union
at the annual meetings, and challenged anyone to show
that in managing the affairs of the Union any attempt had
ever been made to interfere with the absolute independence
of the churches. But some brethren were rather sensitive
to the insinuations of those Presbyterians who alleged that
the Union was, after all, a church-court, and exercised
authority over its members and the churches. Accordingly,
in 1848 it was agreed, though not without strong opposition,
that there should be inserted in the rules of the Union a
statement to the effect that " the Union shall not be regarded
as, in any sense, an ecclesiastical court or corporation,
possessing, or pretending to possess, authority over the
churches, all such authority being contrary to the first prin-
ciples of Congregational polity, but simply in the light of a
Church-aid and Home Mission Society."
This addition to the constitution of the Union was in-
tended to be explanatory of the main objects and functions
of the Union, and to defend it from the suspicion or charge
of being virtually a church-court exercising more or less
authority over the churches. It may be questioned whether
it served this purpose, and whether it might not have been a
sufficient defence of such a charge for the Union to have
gone on its way quietly doing its work as a church-aid and
home mission society, without having regard to the miscon-
ception of its objects and aims by those who kept themselves
in ignorance of both. It is significant of the great change
that has taken place of late years to find that, whereas
fifty years ago many Presbyterians seemed to find a diffi-
culty in understanding how a number of free and indepen-
dent churches could combine for mutual co-operation in the
interests of these churches without being bound or controlled
by some ecclesiastical authority, now the element of Presby-
terial authority is so small, and Presbyterian churches have
such a large freedom in the management of their affairs, that
many Congregationalists fail to find any outstanding differ-
ence between them and those of the Congregational order, so
far as the interference or control of church-courts is con-
RESETTLEMENT 95
cerned ; Presbyterians have now to defend themselves from
being Cougregationalists, instead of Congregationalists having
to defend themselves against the charge of being Presby-
terians, as was the case in former days. The change of
view is to be welcomed as indicating a better understanding
on both sides, and as affording the hope of a closer approxi-
mation of both parties to some common ground in regard to
church principles and order.
Another change in the constitution of the Union was
made in 1857 by the insertion in it of the qualifying condi-
tion that the Union consisted of " churches of the Congre-
gational order, infelloioship with each other." What led to
this change appears to have been the circumstance that two
churches connected with the Union had had a dispute, and
had made it known that they were no longer in fellowship
with each other, though in what particular ways this
absence of fellowship was shown does not appear. The
question then arose as to whether one or both of them
could still be regarded as in connection with the Congre-
gational Union. The qualifying clause requiring churches
to be in fellowship with each other in order to connection
with the Union was explained by a footnote to the effect
that by this it was not meant that " every individual
church must be in fellowship with every other individual
church, but only that, in order to connection with the
Union, every church must be in fellowship with the other
churches generally in the district to which it belongs."
While this change in the constitution really gave formal
expression to the relations of the churches of the Union to
each other which had for a long time been recognised, it
indicated the large departure which had taken place from
the original constitution of the Union. In that nothing
more had been contemplated than the free co-operation of
churches in aiding each other, and in supporting home
mission agencies. Any fellowship or fraternity realised in
this common work grew out of their co-operation, and was
regarded rather as a valuable privilege associated with it
than as a distinct aim in itself. Further, the fact that
96 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
most of the Congregational churches belonged to the Con-
gregational Union was regarded as a kind of denominational
distinction, marking them off from any churches of the
Congregational order that had no connection with the
Union, of which there have always been some. These two
facts — that the association of the churches of the Union
had come to be known and valued as " a fellowship of the
churches," and that connection with the Union had come
to be recognised as a kind of denominational distinction —
were formally recognised in the change made in the consti-
tution in 1857, by which it was announced that the Union
was no longer exclusively a church-aid and home mission
society, but, as such, was also a fraternity of the churches,
banded together for the purpose of mutual fellowship. One
effect of the change was that, in addition to subscribing to
the funds of the Union, which was the only condition of
connection with it originally, churches joining the Union
had to show that they were in fellowship with churches in
their districts already belonging to the Union. Whether
this change was a wise one has been doubted by many.
It has been contended by those who have never viewed
with favour this departure from the original character and
aims of the Union, that it has had the effect of affording an
inducement to Congregational churches to join the Union
which have neither had much sympathy with the practical
objects of the Union, nor have valued the fellowship of the
churches enjoyed in carrying them out, but whose chief
desire has been through connection with it to obtain a
standing before the public which they might not otherwise
have obtained.
In 1873 the idea of the Union being a fraternity of the
churches, was further given effect to by an addition to its
objects to the effect that it existed to " cultivate fraternal
Christian affection, fraternal intercourse, and cordial co-
operation in all that relates to the interests of the associated
churches."
A still further change was made in 1878. Prior to that
year there had been no formal constituency of the Union.
RESETTLEMENT 97
The annual meetings at which all business was transacted
were composed of pastors and members of the churches,
and any resolutions proposed were carried by acclamation, as
at the meetings of missionary or other benevolent societies.
As there had seldom or never been any pronounced division
of opinion shown at such meetings the need for defining the
qualifications of those entitled to vote had not been felt
until 1867. At the annual meeting of that year, however,
a serious division of opinion was shown in connection with
what was known as the " Cranbrook Case." The pastor of
Albany Street Church, Edinburgh, had been invited to give
an address at one of the forthcoming meetings of the Union
in Edinburgh. In the interval between the invitation to
him and the holding of the meetings, however, that gentle-
man had startled the community, and the Congregational
churches in particular, by his public advocacy of views on
prayer and other subjects that were denounced by many
Congregationalists and others. In view of this feeling the
committee of the Union felt bound to withdraw the
invitation to Mr. Cranbrook to address any of the Union
meetings, a step which was resented by him and by his
congregation. At the annual meeting a motion was pro-
posed expressing regret at the action of the committee,
which was carried by a large majority of those present,
most of whom were persons in connection with Albany
Street Church. In the belief that the vote of this meeting
did not express the minds of the members of the churches
connected with the Union an adjourned meeting held next
day virtually reversed the vote of the previous day by
passing a vote of renewed confidence in the committee.
Apart altogether from the case in connection with which
this regrettable division of opinion was shown, there was
a general conviction that the proceedings disclosed a defect
in the constitution of the Union by the absence of any
definition of the qualifications of those entitled to vote at
the annual meetings. Membership of the Union had been
loosely described as that of churches or members of churches
in fellowship with each other agreeing to promote its objects
G
98 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
and contributing to its funds ; but inasmuch as the business
was transacted by individuals present, there was no pro-
vision for ascertaining whether they attended and voted as
representing themselves or the churches to which they
belonged, and as in either case it was not possible at the
time to ascertain whether they had been contributors or not,
any vote taken at the annual meeting had but little value
or significance as expressing the minds of the supporters of
the Union generally. It was not until 1878, however,
that any attempt was made to secure a voting constituency
of the Union. In that year, after strong opposition by
brethren who wished no change to be made, an addition
was made to the constitution providing that the annual
meeting should consist of (1) the pastor of each contributing
church, (2) of one other representative where the member-
ship of the church was under 200, (3) of a third where the
membership was over 200, and (4) of an additional repre-
sentative, irrespective of the number of its members, sending
not less than £40 a year to the funds of the Union.
The last change of any importance was made in 1883,
when a further defect in the constitution was supplied by
directions being given as to the procedure to be followed in
order to the admission of Churches to the Union, and their
separation from it.
Many other minor changes were made in the constitution
from time to time, chiefly in connection with the improved
arrangements regarded as desirable for the greater
facility in transacting the business of the Union ; but
the changes of radical importance have been those already
noted.
It may be well to note that all the changes in the
constitution and modes of procedure in connection with the
Union were made to meet the unforeseen difficulties of
earlier years, and to remove some hindrances to the greater
efficiency of the Union in the management of its affairs
that had been found in actual experience.
In addition to the Congregational Union there have been
several other home-missionary associations which have done
RESETTLEMENT 99
valuable work in several parts of the kingdom. The
" Paisley Society for Missions to the Highlands and Islands"
was instituted in 1817, and supported many itinerant
preachers in their labours. The " Edinburgh Itinerant
Society" was instituted for the same purpose in 1816, and
the labours of its agents were conducted chiefly during the
summer months, and extended over a large part of the High-
lands and Islands. There were also the " Perth, Angus,
and Mearns Itinerant Association," and a similar association
for Stirlingshire. Early in the century there was an
association formed in Aberdeenshire for the purpose of
carrying on home-missionary operations, and in 1848 it
was revived under the name of the " Aberdeen and Banff-
shire County Association," but the name was changed in
1870 to that which it at present bears, " The Northern
Association of Congregational Churches," and its operations
now extend over the counties of Moray, Nairn, and Inver-
ness, as well as Banff and Aberdeen. Meetings are held
from time to time in the several districts for the purpose of
preaching the Gospel and friendly conference on the part of
ministers and members of churches. Expenses are defrayed
partly from the income of bequests and contributions of
members. This society is the last of many similar societies
that existed in several parts of the country, and the good
work it has done, as well as the success which has followed
its operations, makes one regret that similar agencies do not
exist in other parts of the country. Many years ago there
was also a " Glasgow Congregational Union," which was
instituted for the purpose of bringing into closer union the
churches in the district, and for common effort in evangelistic
and other work; but it survived for only a few years. A
few years ago the Union was revived, but after a short
existence it also came to an end.
CHAPTER X.
MINISTERIAL EDUCATION.^
The difficulty of obtaining a regular supply of ministers to
conduct services in the " Circus " in Edinburgh, and of
evangelists to carry on the work of the society for the pro-
pagation of the Gospel at home, led Mr. Eobert Haldane to
think of a plan to educate a number of pious young men
for the ministry. In a letter to the Eev. John Campbell,
dated 6th October, 1798, he intimated his intention to send
ten or twelve young men to Gosport, to be under the care
of Dr. Bogue, with a view to the ministry. Various circum-
stances prevented this idea from being carried out, so far as
Scotland was concerned, although Mr. Haldane gave effect
to his purpose by securing, partly by personal influence and
partly by pecuniary aid, that ten young men were sent to
Gosport to be educated for the ministry in England, one of
whom was the Eev. John Angel James, whom Dr. Bogue
was wont to refer to as one of " Mr. Haldane's students."
It was finally arranged that a class of young men should be
placed under the care of the Eev. Greville Ewing in Edin-
burgh in 1799, and in May of the same year the class
removed with Mr. Ewing to Glasgow. A second class
commenced in January, 1800, at Dundee, under the care of
the Eev. William Innes, who had gone to that place to take
charge of a " tabernacle." This was intended to be a pre-
paratory class, and was removed to Glasgow a year later to
^ See also chapters xiii. and xx,
100
MINISTERIAL EDUCATION 101
be under the care of Mr. Ewing, who had charge of it for
fifteen months. A third class began in Dundee in 1801
under Mr. Innes, but owing to interruption by the students
being required to supply preaching stations it was removed
to Edinburgh, where the members of the class finished their
preparatory studies in 1804. A fourth class began in Edin-
burgh under the care of Messrs. Aikman, Wemyss, and
Stephens in 1802. A fifth class was organised in Edinburgh
in 1803, of which Messrs. Aikman, Wemyss, Stephens, and
Cowie were tutors, and was followed by a sixth class in
the following year under the same tutors. The seventh
class met in 1805 under the care of Messrs. Walker and
Cowie, and was followed by an eighth class in 1806, under
the charge of these gentlemen. The ninth class was under
the charge of Mr. Walker from the end of 1807 till the end
of 1808, when the seminary was given up.
The course of study in these classes generally extended
over two years, with a vacation of six weeks in each year,
and embraced English grammar and rhetoric, the elements of
Greek and Hebrew — the last three classes had Latin in
addition — lectures on systematic theology, and essays upon
prescribed subjects. Each student, in rotation, delivered
sermons before the class, the tutor making his remarks. One
day in each week all were required to speak in rotation
from a passage of Scripture appointed for that purpose, the
tutor making concluding observations. The students were
supported, had medical attendance given them when needed,
class-books provided, and access given to a large and well-
selected library. All this was done at the cost of Mr.
Eobert Haldane, who expended some £20,000 in this way.
" Among the three hundred sent forth from these classes
before they were altogether given up there were some choice
spirits who, having got a start in learning, pushed on their
private studies with vigour and obtained success."^ Of these
were the Eev. John Campbell of Kingsland, Dr. John Pater-
son of St. Petersburg, Dr. D. Eussell, and William Orme. Of
the rest it may be said that in their attainments they were
^ History of the Relief Church, p. 402.
102 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
men fitted to meet the spiritual needs of the times in which
they lived, that most of them were men of high Christian
character, and that though in many cases they did not
succeed in gathering large congregations, they were known
and respected as men of unbending principle and Christian
influence which extended far beyond the particular places in
which they laboured, and that long after they had passed
away their memory was recalled with gratitude and affection
by many to whom their teaching and labours had proved a
spiritual blessing.
That the change of views in regard to " mutual exhorta-
tion," the " plurality of elders," and baptism was followed by
the giving up of the noble work of providing an educated
ministry, which Mr. Haldane had so liberally supported, is
one indication, among others, of the disastrous effects of the
untimely disputes and divisions that took place prior to the
year 1808. The sudden withdrawal of the financial support
required for the classes left those who still adhered to the
principles of Congregational church-order in a serious diffi-
culty. Eecognising, as they all did, that an educated
ministry was necessary for the churches, they were at a loss
to know how it could be provided. There was one man,
however, who on this occasion, as well as in connection with
other difficulties, proved a wise and helpful adviser — the
Eev. Greville Ewing. Some years before the classes were
given up he — in 1804 — drew up a " Memorial concerning a
Theological Academy," in which he stated that it was thought
advisable by many of the brethren that, in addition to the
classes already in existence, an academy should be instituted
by the churches themselves. " The laudable exertions of
an individual, and the success that had attended them,
instead of preventing should provoke us to imitation in this
labour of love of which the magnitude was daily becoming
more apparent."^ While the proposal of Mr. Ewing was not
meant to interfere with the classes conducted at the time
and supported by Mr, Haldane, it is probable that already
the fear was beginning to be felt of having such an important
^ Memoir of Greville Ewing, p. 320.
MINISTERIAL EDUCATION 103
work in the hands of one man and exposed to all the risks
of dependence on his individual support, and there was a
strong feeling that it would be an advantage to the churches
themselves, and serve to stimulate their interest, if they had
an institution of their own and supported by themselves.
The biographer of Mr. Ewing recorded that the memorial,
" being submitted to some influential persons, they discour-
aged its publication, and it was for a time laid aside."
In 1808, when the classes supported by Mr. Haldane
were given up, Mr. Ewing found a fitting opportunity for
renewing the proposal he made four years previously, and
he published " A Memorial on Education for the Ministry
of the Gospel," in which he gave in detail his views as
to how the theological institution or academy he proposed
should be conducted, and sketched a scheme of study for
young men entering it. An examination of his scheme
clearly indicates that the subject was not a new one to
him, but that it had engaged his earnest thought for many
years. His own ripe attainments as a theologian and
Biblical scholar specially qualified him for dealing with the
subject of ministerial education, and the zeal he had shown
while tutor of Mr. Haldane's classes in seeking to inspire
his students with the love of sacred learning was grate-
fully remembered by those of them who had entered the
ministry. The " Memorial " was supported by two men
of weighty judgment and of great influence — Messrs. Eussell
of Dundee and Mr. Orme of Perth — in an "Address " which
they sent to the churches, and which served to stir up
increasing interest in Mr. Ewing's proposal. At length,
in 1811, a numerous and very interesting meeting of pastors
and brethren belonging to various churches, called by
circular, was held in Glasgow on 13th March, at which
it was agreed to form the " Glasgow Theological Academy."
Dr. Wardlaw and Mr. Ewing were requested to be its
tutors, and a plan of education was presented, " embracing
Latin, Greek, and Hebrew, logic, natural philosophy, mathe-
matics, general history, and theology, connected with a
comparative view of philosophical and Christian morality.
104 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
The course was to be four years, five if necessary. The
more advanced branches of classical learning were to be
obtained at the university, the expenses of which, as well
as the support of the students, in cases requiring it, were
to be borne by the funds of the institution, this support
to be continued for one year at least after the commence-
ment of their ministerial labours, if within that time they
did not obtain a ministerial charge. All persons received
as students were to be recommended by their respective
pastors, with consent of the churches to which they belonged,
decided piety being a qualification indispensable." ^
That, in pleading for the funds necessary for the support
of the Academy, the tutors and committee of the Academy
felt called upon not only to state the grounds on which
such an institution deserved and called for the support
01 the churches, but to defend it against the objections
known to exist in the minds of many to any such educa-
tion for the ministry as the Academy sought to provide,
was a clear indication of the extent to which the views
of the Messrs. Haldane and others as to an educated
ministry prevailed. The scheme was assailed with vehement
earnestness by Mr. William Ballantine and others in several
pamphlets published shortly after the appearance of Mr.
Ewing's " Memorial," on the grounds that it was unscrip-
tural, unnecessary, and dangerous. The following extract
from a pamphlet by Mr. Ballantine published in 1809, in
reply to Mr. Ewing's "Memorial," may serve to indicate how
he and the party he represented and largely led viewed the
modest and reasonable proposals of Mr. Ewing: "As you have
called on the churches to have seminaries of education for
the ministry of the Gospel, I would entreat them to consider
that there is no warrant for them in the Word of God, that
they are inventions of men, and destructive to Christianity.
I would also beseech them to walk in the commandments
and ordinances of Christ for their edification, which, if they
do, they may rest assured that schools of divinity are
altogether foreign to the nature of Christ's kingdom."
^ Memoir of Greville Ewing, p. 379.
MINISTERIAL EDUCATION 105
" It was of immense advantage to the successful com-
mencement of the Academy that Mr, Ewing and Dr.
Wardlaw enjoyed the full confidence of their brethren,
and at their unanimous request undertook the conduct of
the enterprise ; for, while they were appointed tutors having
the entire control and direction of the education of the
students, and served without salary, one of them (Dr.
Wardlaw) had to act as secretary when the correspondence
was necessarily heavy, and both had to deal with applicants
when, as appears from the early minutes, it was necessary
to travel to a distance to gather the testimony required to
satisfy themselves and the committee. For twenty-eight
years their generous services were rendered without
remuneration, with a zeal and devotedness beyond all
praise. Afterwards it was felt that the churches ought
no longer to allow the tutors to labour gratuitously. In May,
1839, Mr. John Morell Mackenzie, a brother beloved, who
had previously rendered assistance in the work of the
Academy, was requested to give his undivided services to
the institution, and was appointed resident tutor at a salary
of £200. Mr. Ewing died in 1841, and Mr. Mackenzie in
the memorable shipwreck of the 'Pegasus' in 1843. Dr.
Wardlaw died in 1853." " In 1846 Mr. Alexander Thomson,
who had succeeded Mr. Mackenzie as pastor of the church
in West Nile Street, Glasgow, was appointed to the chair
vacant by his death, and, associated with Dr. Wardlaw, gave
great satisfaction as tutor till 1855, when he removed to
Manchester. In 1855 Dr. W. Lindsay Alexander was
appointed professor of Systematic Theology, and Dr. Gowan
professor of Biblical Literature. The institution was
then removed to Edinburgh, and received the more appro-
priate designation of the ' Theological Hall of the Congrega-
tional Churches of Scotland.' " ^ The late Eev. Gilbert
Wardlaw served the Academy as tutor for a time in
1845, and the Rev. William Swan in 1844-5. Dr. Alexander
continued to act as professor until 1882, when he retired
^Address by the lafe Rev. G. D. Cullen at the Jubilee of the Congre-
gational Union in 1862.
106 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
and his retirement was followed by that of Dr. Gowan in
the same year. The late Rev. James Eobbie was professor
from 1872 until 1879, when he resigned. In 1884 the Eev.
Dr. D. W. Simon was appointed principal and professor of
Systematic Theology, and continued in office until 1893, and
in 1894 was succeeded by the Eev. Dr. J. M. Hodgson.
The Eev. A. F. Simpson, M.A., was appointed professor
of Biblical Literature in 1885. On the union of the Hall and
that of the Evangelical Union in 1897 the Eev. Dr. William
Taylor and the Eev. A. M'Nair, M.A., were added to the
staff of professors.
For a period of four years — from 1874 to 1878 — the late
Eev. John Blacklock conducted classes in Arran, with the
view of training young men having a knowledge of the
Gaelic language for service as evangelists and pastors of
churches in the Highlands. The attendance varied from
four to thirteen, and the reports of examiners appointed by
the committee of the Theological Hall bore testimony to
the benefits received by the students from attendance at the
classes.
During the earlier years of its history the Glasgow
Academy required only a comparatively small income for its
support, owing to the tutors having generously given their
services without a salary, and there was therefore the less
demand on the liberality of the churches on its behalf
When, however, the salaries of professors had to be paid,
though until within the last twenty years these were very
small, the expenses increased ; but in course of time the
growing prosperity of the descendants of the earlier Indepen-
dents manifested itself in the increasing income of the Hall,
especially from individual donations, and within the last
forty years it has received large personal subscriptions and
endowments. Foremost among these have been the gifts of
the late Miss Baxter of Ellangowan, who, before her death
in 1884, made over to trustees for behoof of the Hall, the
sum of £10,000 in London and North-Western Eailway Stock,
the income of which is used in providing for the salary of
the principal of the Hall, who must also be professor of
MINISTERIAL EDUCATION 107
Systematic Theology, and take general charge of the students;
a second donation took the form of an endowment of the
Baxter Scholarship, the income of which (amounting to
£100) is given to a student approved by the Trustees for
the purpose of enabling him to continue his studies at a
university or privately, under the direction of the Trustees ;
a third gift was in the form of premises purchased by Miss
Baxter for £4000 in George Square, Edinburgh, for use as a
place of meeting for the professors and students ; and a
fourth gift was in the form of a legacy of £2000 bequeathed
to the funds of the institution. The sums thus given by
Miss Baxter amounted to over £18,000. In addition to the
endowments mentioned there are also the following :
The Whitelaw scholarship, capital £625, annual income
£25 18s. 2d. ; Fraserburgh bursary, capital £481, income
about £20 ; Wemyss bursary, capital £500, income about
£20 ; two Smith bursaries, annual income of each about
£20; David Eussell bursary, income about £20 ; Lindsay
Alexander bursary, income about £20 ; John Pillans
bursary, £20. On the Union of the two Halls in 1897
the following bursaries belonging to the Evangelical Union
Theological Hall were added; the Bowie bursary, capital
£681 15s. lid., income £30; the Thomson bursary, capital £150,
income about £6; and the Wilson bursary, capital £100,
income £3. These scholarships and bursaries are awarded
to students either by competition or at the discretion of the
committee.
The course of study for students has varied in duration
during the history of the Academy and Hall. In the
earlier years of its existence the winter was occupied by
the students in giving attendance at classes in the University,
while during the summer months they attended lectures by
the professors of the Hall, and took part in other exercises.
At a later period students attended both the Hall and
University during the winter, and had the summer months
as a vacation, during which time, however, most of them
were engaged in preaching. Later still, the original arrange-
ment of a nine months' course each year was reverted to.
108 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
During the last few years, however, a considerable change
has been made in regard to the course of study.
The Committee now require that all students shall have
completed their Literary Course at the University, and either
to have graduated or to be prepared to pass a satisfactory
examination, before their entrance upon the Theological
curriculum of the Hall. At present, the Theological Course
begins in May, and consists of three Summer Sessions and two
Winter Sessions. At the beginning of their Literary Course,
students may apply for enrolment on the books of the Hall,
and if received, they have the privilege of attending Elemen-
tary Classes at the Hall in Hebrew, Greek Testament, and
Homiletics, during the Summer Sessions prior to the com-
mencement of their Theological course. From the beginning
of the institutions now combined, the aim has been to give
first importance to the personal character of the applicants
for admission to the Hall, and their fitness for profiting by
its advantages, and to send forth from it with their recom-
mendation only those who, in the judgment of the professors
and committee, have proved themselves to be qualified for
the work of the ministry.
The foregoing sketch of the history of ministerial educa-
tion in connection with Scottish Congregationalism very
clearly shows how thoroughly the churches dissociated
themselves from the narrow and mischievous tendencies
and views of the men who early in the century sought to
cast contempt upon an educated ministry. The men who
came to the rescue of the churches from the evil effects of
this pernicious teaching were really the saviours of the
churches from the destruction that overtook others of them
as the result of opposition to, and lack of provision for, an
educated ministry. Even more than this can be said : for
there can be little doubt that it was the alarm caused by
the prevalence of views unfavourable to the education of
young men for the ministry that led many to give it greater
importance and prominence in their work for the churches
than they otherwise would have given.
CHAPTER XL
DIFFICULTIES AND ENCOURAGEMENTS.
The institution of the Congregational Union not only-
saved many churches that were threatened with extinc-
tion, but had the effect of enabling those that survived
the troubles of the early part of the century to carry on
their church and evangelistic work with increased efficiency
and comfort. The union of the brethren in a common
cause in which they were all interested tended to consoli-
date them as a religious community, and to afford them
increasing fellowship in their frequent association and
co-operation. The fact that for some thirty years subse-
quent to the formation of the Union there were few events
of an outstanding character in the annals of the churches
of itself indicates that, at least, a period of peace and
unity succeeded the troublous times that preceded the
institution of the Union. It can hardly be said, however,
that there was any great increase in the number of
churches during that time, and they did little more than
hold their ground. There were several causes which
operated against their numerical increase.
In the first place, many of the churches which were
planted in the early part of the century were unfavourably
placed as to population. In many instances the Congrega-
tional church was situated in a small town or village,
which was used as a centre of evangelistic work on the
part of the pastor, whose labours were in many cases
109
110 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
devoted to the work of evangelisation in the neighbourhood
or in remote itinerancies, especially in the summer months.
While he was thus engaged in earnest and useful work
during the week he was able to give all the less time
and attention to the requirements of his own church or
those of the place in which he lived, with the result that
the church remained weak in its membership.
In the second place, it was found that the gifts and
abilities required to make a useful and successful evangelist
were not often accompanied by those necessary for the
pastoral office, and thus earnest and successful itinerant
preachers were often found to be lacking in the faculty
of managing a church and attracting people to its services.
Not a few of the good men whose praise was in all the
churches ministered as pastors to small churches, which,
after the first few years of the pastorate, either remained
stationary or decreased. This was the case with many of
those churches which were under the care of the men
who went forth from the theological classes supported by
Mr. E. Haldane, and under whose preaching many of the
churches were formed. These men were, chief of all,
evangelists who gave their whole strength to the preaching
of the Gospel in destitute parts of the kingdom. Many of
them were men of intellectual ability, but they had not
been trained to those habits of study necessary for the
continuance of an edifying and interesting ministry of the
Word ; and the earnest and impressive sermons they
preached while itinerating, and for a few years after they
had settled as pastors, ceased to awaken the same interest
they originally stirred in hearers ; the repetition of the
same round of preaching year in and year out with but
little variety of thought or illustration became somewhat
wearisome to hearers, and rather repelled occasional
worshippers. But for the high respect, and even admiration,
in which the Christian character of many of these good
men was held, and the singular purity and unselfishness of
their lives and labours, they could not have kept together
the churches to which they ministered, small as these were.
DIFFICULTIES AND ENCOURAGEMENTS 111
In the third place, many churches — especially in the
Highlands — became extinct owing to emigration, and the
decrease of population from other causes. In one instance,
so large was the exodus of people from the place in which
the church was situated that the pastor found that in order
to retain his flock he must emigrate with them, which
he did.
In the fourth place, while the controversies that led to
division among the early churches had to a large extent
ceased, there still remained one outstanding cause of division
and separation which has always more or less affected
Congregational churches, viz., difference of opinion in regard
to the ordinance of baptism. Many of the original Congre-
gational churches adopted Baptist views, and even after
the first great division in 1808, when a large number fol-
lowed the Haldanes in their Baptist sentiments, difference
on this question from time to time led to secessions from
many of the surviving churches, and greatly weakened their
membership. Indeed, throughout the history of Congrega-
tionalism in Scotland, Baptist churches have been recruited
in their membership very largely from Congregational
churches, and although this circumstance has not affected
the strength of Congregationalism as a church-system, seeing
Baptists are also Congregationalists, it has always had an
adverse effect in keeping back the increase in membership
of churches distinctively known as Congregational.
In the fifth place, in addition to these causes of hindrance
to the increase in number of the churches there ought
to be mentioned one of an outstanding nature which
operated most powerfully of all. That was the condition
of church-membership which was insisted on by all the
churches — that every applicant was required to make
personal confession of faith in Christ as Lord and Saviour,
and that such evidence of the reality of this faith and of
conduct consistent with it should be given as would satisfy
the church. In the earlier days of the churches in the
end of last century and beginning of the present, when
professed converts were numerous, there was not the
112 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
time or opportunity for the somewhat inquisitorial examina-
tion of applicants for membership which was made at a
later period, when converts became fewer, and when cases of
application could receive more attention than they had in
earlier days. Every application was examined with scrupul-
ous care, and while pastors and brethren of the churches
manifested a real and friendly sympathy with all who
sought admission to the church, and a desire to welcome all
who manifestly were sincere Christians, they made the pro-
cess of admission to the church an ordeal that repelled
many who might otherwise have strengthened the church
by their accession to it. The people of Scotland have
always been reserved as to personal religious experiences,
and even those whose character and spirit have left no
doubt in the minds of others as to their genuine piety
have been unwilling to acknowledge that they were really
Christians in the sense of having a conscious faith in Christ
as their personal Saviour, fearing lest any confession of this
kind might savour of presumption on a matter which they
have for generations been taught to regard as depending
chiefly on the inscrutable decree of God. They were, at
least at the period to which reference is now made, disposed
to regard with aversion the assertion respecting anyone
that he was an undoubted Christian, and with even greater
aversion any declaration of this kind regarding themselves.
This feeling was fostered to a great extent by the religious
teaching they received, both through the Westminster Con-
fession of Faith and the Shorter Catechism, and also of the
preachers of the time, as well as by the practice that
obtained in regard to admission to the membership of the
church among Presbyterians. The question as to the re-
ligious experience of anyone applying for admission to
churches of the latter order was carefully avoided, all that
was required being "competent religious knowledge and
consistent walk." The possession of religious knowledge
was ascertained by ability on the part of the applicant to
answer certain questions, chiefly from the Shorter Catechism,
and the " consistent walk " was proved by the absence of
DIFFICULTIES AND ENCOURAGEMENTS 113
any known conduct inconsistent with religious profession.
It became evident therefore that owing to the practice
of Congregationalists in giving chief prominence to the
personal faith in Christ of an applicant, inquiry as to
which was avoided by Presbyterians, increase of member-
ship among the former was hindered by causes that did not
operate in the case of the latter. In the one case the
religious decision expected was so positive and personal that
only those who were prepared humbly to confess them-
selves believers in Christ thought of applying for admission
to a Congregational church, while in the case of Presby-
terians the requirements as to membership were of so
negative a nature that all persons on reaching a certain
age were expected to join the church.
While it is admitted that the practice of Congregational-
ists and Presbyterians was diverse on a point of radical
importance, there can be no doubt that the difference
was exaggerated to the disadvantage of Congregationalists
by the loose assertions of Presbyterian ministers and others
to the effect that Congregationalists required something like
assurance of personal salvation on the part of applicants,
and that the church examining and admitting them virtually
presumed to determine their spiritual condition, and to
"judge the heart," which can be done by God alone. Not-
withstanding the repeated disavowal of any such intention,
the insinuation or charge continued to be persistently made,
and even at the present time is made by many whose
ignorance or recklessness of assertion is less excusable than
those of the Presbyterians of a former time. Even at the
time when the pastors and churches of the Congregational
order in Scotland regarded it as a duty both to the church
and to the applicant to warn him of the danger of making a
merely nominal profession of religion, and of the necessity of
having the experience of a spiritually-awakened life, they
never presumed to pass judgment on the spiritual condition
of anyone, but simply sought to remind applicants that
only as they were sincere followers of Christ would church-
membership prove of any real spiritual advantage to them
114 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
or to others through them ; and all that any church dared
to declare for itself was that approved applicants should
give such evidence of their faith in Christ as warranted the
church in welcoming them into its fellowship. But they
never failed to remind those who desired to come among
them that the judgment as to the spiritual state of anyone
was God's alone. At the same time, there can be little
doubt that the practice of requiring or expecting a more or
less detailed account of the religious experience of applicants
was carried to unwise and needless excess, and operated as a
great discouragement to many who had the desire to join
the church. In the course of time a more wise and con-
sistent course came to be followed by Congregational
churches, which, while still continuing to give chief promi-
nence to personal faith in Christ as the essential qualification
for church-membership, require no more than a humble and
simple declaration of such faith, along with such evidence as
may be available as to consistent conduct, leaving to the
applicant to choose whether the confession be made in more
or fewer words. It has been found that the best safeguard
against the admission of those who are unworthy is the
known character of the particular church as a community of
Christians whose known spiritual life and aims are such as
to encourage those only to seek connection with it who
regard the fellowship of Christians as a spiritual help to
themselves, and as affording opportunities for extending the
kingdom of Christ among men.
During the period now under review, the benefits the
churches received from the institution of the Glasgow
Theological Academy became increasingly apparent. Eefer-
ence has already been made to the somewhat slender
equipment for the ministry the men had who went forth
from the classes supported by Mr. E. Haldane, and the
consequent disadvantage under which they laboured in
the work of their ministry. By the institution of the
Academy a large advance was made in the arrangements
for the education of the students who attended its classes.
Greater care was taken in the selection of students, more
DIFFICULTIES AND ENCOURAGEMENTS 115
importance was attached to their literary culture by attend-
ance at the University being required, and the theological
classes were more numerous and extended over a much
longer period than had formerly been thought necessary.
Indeed, comparing the course of theological study in the
Academy with that required in other institutions of the
kind in Scotland, the advantages enjoyed by the students
were, at least, equal to those of any other divinity hall in the
kingdom. One result of this was that in the course of time
Congregational ministers came to be regarded as educated
and cultured men, and there was no longer room for the
taunt of former years, that they were only " vagrant
preachers." Nor was this the only result of the institution
of the Academy. The new generation of ministers were
better instructed in Congregational principles than their
predecessors had been. The theological classes supported
by Mr. E. Haldane in the early years of the century were
intended mainly for the training of evangelists who were
not expected to profess being Congregationalists in principle.
They were drawn from the Established Church, the Eelief
Church, and from the Burghers and Anti-Burghers, but the
only qualifications required were " genuine piety, talents
susceptible of cultivation, and a desire to be useful by
teaching and preaching the words of eternal life." Church-
polity appears to have had no place, or a very small place,
in the teaching of the tutors, with one exception, and the
men who went forth from the classes in many cases had but
hazy views of principles of church-order. It was probably
owing to this that the pastors drawn from most of these
classes were ill-fitted to deal with the difficulties and dis-
putes that arose in their early ministry. The exception
referred to was that of the Eev. Greville Ewing, of whose
teaching one of his students said that by the faithfulness
with which he sought to make the Bible its own interpreter,
" Congregational principles insinuated themselves, almost
imperceptibly, into the minds of the students." It is
significant to note that it was from the classes of Mr.
Ewing that the men went forth who afterwards became
116 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
convinced and decided Congregationalists, and who stood
faithfully to their principles in a time of unsettlenient and
secession. So large a share had Mr. Ewing in the exposition
and defence of Congregational principles that one of his
students declared that " in originating and extending
Congregationalism in Scotland Mr. Ewing was honoured,
under God to be (I do not hesitate to affirm) the chief
instrument. He was not only the beloved tutor of the first
band of Congregational ministers, but also the able and
ready advocate of their principles, both from the pulpit and
the press, in whatever form he found them misrepresented
or attacked." When, therefore, Mr. Ewing became one of
the tutors of the Glasgow Academy, and had as his colleague
so able and convinced an exponent and defender of
Congregationalism as Dr. Wardlaw, ample provision and
security were obtained for the adequate teaching of the
students in the principles of church-polity which they were
expected to apply as pastors of churches. The loose and
imperfect view that had hitherto prevailed among many of
the early preachers regarding church-order gave place to the
convictions of men who had been taught to hold clear and
consistent opinions on all matters connected with the
regulation of church-life, and the men who went forth from
the Academy became notable for the faithfulness and
intelligence with which they sought to apply the principles
they conscientiously held. The effect of this was that under
such men the churches enjoyed freedom from the distracting
questions that had arisen in former days, and the members
had a more intelligent appreciation of the principles they
professed than those who had gone before them.
In the course of the twenty or more years that preceded
the "Disruption" of the Established Church in 1843 there
were many movements of a religious and political nature —
such as the Sociuian and " Apocrypha " controversies, the
anti-slavery movement, the abolition of the religious tests,
Catholic emancipation, etc. — in connection with which
Congregationalists had their share, and found opportunity
for exhibiting the liberal principles they held in their
DIFFICULTIES AND ENCOURAGEMENTS 117
application to both religious and political affairs ; but as
their relation to these movements was only of an indirect
nature, there is the less need for detailed reference to them.
There was, however, one great movement, known as the
" Voluntary Controversy," in which they took a keen
interest, and in connection with which they found oppor-
tunity for declaring their principles as free-church men, and
in promoting which one of their number — Dr. Wardlaw —
rendered distinguished service.
The political agitation which resulted in the passing of
the Catholic Emancipation Bill in 1829 and the Eeform Bill
in 1832 had the effect of calling public attention to the
abuses that existed in connection with the Established
Churches in Great Britain. The exposure of some of these
led to the formation of two parties, the one holding that the
remedy for existing evils was to be found in the removal of
acknowledged abuses, while the other held that the only
effectual remedy was in the abolition of civil establishments
of religion altogether. In Scotland the " reform " party
consisted of ministers and members of the Established
Church who complained of the grievance that existed in
connection with that body owing to the enforced settlement
of ministers presented by church-patrons on unwilling
congregations, and who demanded that the right of a
majority of the congregation to " veto " such presentations
should be acknowledged. The agitation in favour of this
reform — which came to be called the " Ten Years' Conflict "
— resulted ultimately in the disruption of the Established
Church and the formation of the Eree Church. But while
this agitation was going on in the Established Church
another had arisen outside of it, which had been originated
and maintained by those who objected to all national
establishments of religion, and who belonged to the various
non-established churches in Scotland. Hence the some-
what mixed nature of the controversy which ensued. On
the one hand those belonging to "dissenting" churches were
in full sympathy and agreement with the reform party
in the Establishment in their desire and effort to obtain
118 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
freedom from the evils of patronage, but declared that
this was only one of many abuses arising from connection
of churches with the State, and that the full remedy for
these was in the abolition of that connection. On the
other hand, the reform party in the Established Church
were as determined upholders of the connection as ever,
and vehemently opposed and denounced the principles and
aims of the " voluntaries." Various grounds were taken by
the latter in support of their position. Some objected to
civil establishments of religion on the ground that, as a
principle of political economy, it was in the interest of the
State — that is, of the whole nation — that the support of
religion should be left to the operation of the ordinary law
of supply and demand ; others held that it was no proper
function of the State to interfere with the instruction of the
people, or to favour or repress particular opinions or beliefs,
religious or other ; and others held that inasmuch as it
is the duty and privilege of Christians to provide the means
of supporting the ordinances of the Gospel, and equally
their duty to acknowledge the authority and guidance of
the Divine Head of the church alone in the regulation of
its affairs, it was entirely outwith the province of the civil
magistrate to use the national funds in support of particular
churches, or to interfere with these in the management of
their affairs. Of the dissenting churches, the Secession
Church appears to have been the least prepared to take
common ground with other voluntaries, owing to its
opposition to the Established Church having been mainly
confined to a protest against the particular forms of oppres-
sion from which its fathers and founders had suffered, but,
" having been directed by a train of events into the right
path, they gradually pushed their principles to their legiti-
mate consequences, and began to discern the impropriety
of all religious establishments whatever."^ The Indepen-
dents, while not ignoring the political injustice of civil
establishments of religion, founded their opposition to them
mainly on the ground that they were unscriptural and
1 History of Relief Church, p. 458 ff.
DIFFICULTIES AND ENCOURAGEMENTS 119
opposed to the very nature and teaching of Christianity ;
and the Eelief Church, as might have been expected from
its traditional connection with Independency, took the same
view.
For a time, Congregationalists held themselves some-
what aloof from the voluntary controversy, finding it
had assumed too much of a political complexion to their
taste ; but as the years passed on they were drawn into the
conflict. Their best representative, both in his teaching
and action, was the Rev. Dr. Ralph Wardlaw. Avoiding
as much as possible the discussion of the question at issue
on political grounds, he took his stand on Scripture, and in
many sermons and addresses expounded his views. So
great was the impression produced by his treatment of the
subject that he was invited by the Deputies of the " Three
Denominations of Protestant Dissenters " in London to
deliver a course of lectures on the subject, which he did
in 1839. In the discharge of this duty Dr. Wardlaw
found a fitting opportunity for giving expression, not only
to the views held by Independents in regard to the
application of the principles of civil and religious liberty
which had throughout • their history been maintained by
them, but also to the supreme regard in which they held
the Scriptures as the source of final authority in all matters
affecting the Christian faith and Christian Churches. The
main positions he sought to establish were these : " 1. That
in the New Testament there is no recognition whatever of
the authority of civil rulers in matters of religion ; 2. That
in the New Testament the maintenance and progress of the
Church's interest are, with all possible explicitness, com-
mitted to the Church itself; 3. That all imitation of the
ancient Jewish constitution, in this particular, is, from its
very nature, impossible, and, were it possible, would not
be warrantable." The lectures were published and obtained
a large circulation, and have been acknowledged by many
to have been one of the most helpful and valuable con-
tributions to the cause of voluntaryism. Although sixty
years have elapsed since their publication their clearness
120 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
and comprehensiveness of statement, and their force of
argument, make them as suitable to the present time, in
which the principles discussed are still exciting interest, as
they were to the time when they were delivered.^
'^National E)itablishm&nts of Religion, by Ealph Wardlaw, D.D.
Rev. Greville Ewing, 1767-1841. Rev. Ralph Wardiaw, D.D., 1779-1853.
Rev. David Russell, D.D., 1779-1848.
Rev. John Watson, 1777-1844. Rev. W. Lindsay Alexander, 1808-1884.
CHAPTER XII.
TWO DISRUPTIONS.
Speaking at a meeting held in Aberdeen in the year 1843,
a few weeks before the Disruption of the Estabhshed Church
of Scotland, the late Principal Dewar, of Marischal College
(who had begun his ministry as an Independent in Breadal-
bane), said that "the future historian of the Church will
have to say that the Congregationalists have done much
to bring about the present crisis in the Church of Scot-
land." ^ This testimony was true. The revival of evan-
gelical religion which took place in the Established Church,
and one result of which was the Disruption of 1843, was
largely owing, in the providence of God, to the labours of
the Congregational ministers, who went over the length and
breadth of the land preaching the Gospel of Christ, so that
there remained few places which had not been visited by
them on their great mission. The fruits of that faithful
and earnest service for God and men were shown in the
rise and progress of the Congregational churches, and in the
gathering into them of many of the most pious and exem-
plary Christians of the time ; but, so far as numbers were
concerned, this was probably the smaller result of the
labours of the good men who carried the knowledge of the
Gospel throughout the land. Every denomination in Scotland
reaped the advantage of the revived interest in true religion
which came to be manifested. Many belonging to other
1 Congregational Magazine of 1843, p. 245.
121
122 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
denominations resorted to the places where the " mission-
aries " preached, received spiritual blessing, and became
more earnest members of the churches to which they
belonged. Had it not been for strictness of communion on
the part of the Congregationalists, many would have joined
their churches, but from an exaggerated idea of this they
refrained from doing so. But there can be little doubt that
in the revived spiritual life of such persons the churches of
which they were members became all the stronger and more
earnest in their evangelical spirit, and thereby prepared the
way for that large advance of evangelicalism which, more
than aught else, led to the Disruption. Among the minis-
ters also there was awakened a spirit of greater zeal. " A
more pointed manner of preaching was adopted by many.
There came to be more discrimination of character. The
unfettered freeness of the Gospel was more fully proclaimed,
while its practical influence was more distinctly unfolded.
In the course of time there appeared an increased and
increasing number of evangelical ministers in the Establish-
ment, and a beneficial influence was found to operate upon
other denominations." In this way the influence of the early
Congregationalists extended far beyond the small body of
churches of that connection, and in view of the large exten-
sion of evangelistic and similar Christian work of which
they had been pioneers, they could say that they had indeed
laboured, and other men had entered on their labours. It
was but natural that the Congregationalists of 1843 rejoiced
in the evangelical revival which brought about the Disrup-
tion, for in the earnest religious spirit manifested, and the
principles for which those who led the Disruption party
contended, they found a renewed testimony to truths and
principles which they had firmly and earnestly held for
many years. Although, so far as their own churches were
concerned, the Disruption was an outside movement, it was
one that had their fullest sympathy, and in the success of
which they all rejoiced.
The Disruption affected the Congregational churches in
two ways. On the one hand, they could not but sympathise
TWO DISRUPTIONS 123
with the protest of Free Churchmen against the denial on
the part of the Government of the day of the liberty
claimed by congregations of the Established Church to
choose their own ministers. Although the claim they made
was a very limited one, and came far short of that which
the " voluntaries " of the time supported, who desired free-
dom from all State patronage and control, yet it was regarded
as a step in the right direction, and the hope was cherished
that it might be followed by still further developments
in the direction of obtaining full freedom from State control.
Probably had they anticipated that the Free Church party
would maintain the same " anti-voluntary " attitude after
the Disruption they had taken before it, and by claiming to
be the " Church of Scotland " virtually ignore and waive
aside their dissenting brethren, the latter might have
been more reserved in their congratulations ; but at the
time they could only see a large body of Christian people
prepared to make heroic sacrifices in maintaining their
protest against the unwarrantable interference of the civil
authorities with the religious liberties of the people, and
wish them full success in their great enterprise. On the
other hand, Congregational churches suffered not a little by
the Disruption. For many years prior to that event their
places of worship had been attended by members of the
Established Church, who desired preaching of a more evan-
gelical kind than they found in that body. It was the
habit of many of these to be regular hearers and seat-holders
in Congregational churches, and to attend the churches of
which they were members only once or twice a year, at the
season of the communion. The connection was even closer
than this, for many of them welcomed the visits of the
Congregational minister as if he had been their own pastor,
and showed much practical sympathy with the work of the
churches and the institutions in connection with them. The
Disruption changed all this. In the course of a few years
few of those who had been wont to worship in Congre-
gational churches were seen there, but attended the new
Free Churches. They had never given up either their
124 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
nominal connection with the Establishment or their Presby-
terian views of church-order, and naturally when they found
places of worship and a ministry congenial to them their
connection with Congregational churches came to an end.
This exodus of hearers adversely affected the churches both
in regard to the number of hearers and also financially, and
increased the difficulty of many of them of supporting the
ordinances of the Gospel among themselves. The fact, too,
that the Disruption was not only an ecclesiastical movement
but a religious revival which had been going on for many
years, and that it resulted in a large increase of earnest
evangelical preachers throughout the land tended to make
the preaching and evangelical spirit of Congregationalists less
distinctive among dissenters than they had been in former
years. Further, Free Churchmen had secured all the free-
dom they could hope for at the time, but they retained
the traditions of the Established Church, especially in regard
to qualifications for church-membership, and continued to
have the " promiscuous " communion of the church they
had left, though, owing to the fact that they had among
them the most earnest members of the Established Church,
their membership was not so purely nominal as that of
the latter body. Prior to the Disruption, Congregational
churches had been exposed to the temptation to relax their
terms of membership by avoiding the requirement of per-
sonal piety in order to church-membership, so as to make an
open door for many who would have joined them but for
their insistence on personal faith in Christ as a condition of
membership ; and it is to their credit that they in no case
swerved from their distinctive principles in order to have an
increase of numbers. Owing to the Disruption, they became
more isolated from persons of other denominations than they
had been before ; for in Free churches many of those
who had resorted to Congregational churches found evan-
gelical preaching, which to them was of chief importance,
and they were therefore disposed to be all the more
tolerant in regard to the prevalence of " mixed " com-
munion, which, however, they professed to regret. And
TWO DISRUPTIONS 125
thus accessions to membership from among hearers in
Congregational churches became fewer than in former years.
In 1839 there was a remarkable revival of religion
amono- many of the Congregational churches in Scotland,
the spirit of which continued for some years. " Protracted
meetings," as they were then called, were held in churches
in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Dundee, Paisley, Dumfries, Kilsyth,
Hawick, Alexandria, Anstruther, and other places. Many
conversions were reported, new churches were planted in
places where none had existed before, and the membership
of all the churches in places where the meetings had been
held was largely increased. There had been no such
extensive spiritual movement since the beginning of the
century, and the gratifying results of the earnest preaching
of the Gospel which was carried on recalled the best days of
the Haldanes and those who had been their fellow-labourers
over forty years before. But, just as that earlier movement
had been followed by trouble to the churches, so this later
spiritual work was followed by divisions of an almost
equally regrettable kind. In one respect the rupture of
fellowship relations between some of the churches was
caused by difference of opinion regarding matters of more
vital importance than those of the somewhat petty nature
which disturbed the peace of the churches at the earlier
date. It affected the work of preachers of the Gospel in a
very direct manner, inasmuch as it involved a difference of
view in regard to the presentation of the teaching of the
Bible concerning the work of Christ and the Holy Spirit.
In order to understand the points on which difference arose
it is necessary to have in view what may be called the
" doctrinal " positions held by Congregationalists during the
first forty years of the century.
When the pioneers of Scottish Congregationalism began
their work towards the close of the last century there was
little or no difference between them and Presbyterians
regarding the leading doctrines of the Christian faith. Their
outstanding differences were confined to questions of aims
and methods of Christian work and church-order; but,
126 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
substantially, the doctrines preached by both Congrega-
tionalists and Presbyterians were the same. The former as
fully adhered to the Westminster Confession of Faith as the
latter, with the exception of those parts of it relating to
church-order and the functions of the civil magistrate in
regard to religion. So early as 1816 Mr. E. Haldane had
given an exposition of the Epistle to the Eomans in which
the Calvinistic position with regard to election, the limited
extent of the atonement, and cognate doctrines were main-
tained with characteristic earnestness, and his brother shared
his views. Such men as Mr. Ewing, Mr. Aikman, and
others took the same position. It was not until 1830 that
there was any distinct departure from the " Confessional "
view of the work of Christ ; but in that year Dr. Wardlaw,
in a work on the " Extent of the Atonement," maintained
the position concerning the atonement of Christ, that, in
principle, it is a " vindicatory manifestation of the righteous-
ness of God, in order to the free and honourable exercise of
His mercy." He advocated the view that the atonement
was a remedy of universal sufficiency, and on that ground
sought to vindicate the " unconditional freeness of the
Gospel." While thus maintaining the universality of the
atonement, Dr. Wardlaw held that it was limited in its
efficiency by the purpose of God in election — a purpose
effectually carried out in the bestowment on the elect of the
special influence of the Holy Spirit, in virtue of which they
are led to accept the Divine offer of salvation. This view
of the work of Christ was known at a later time as "Moderate
Calvinism," and was held by many English Congrega-
tionalists. It was a view that differed from that of the
Calvinists holding the Westminster Confession on one point
chiefly, viz., the extent of the atonement, the latter holding
that the atonement was limited to the elect only, and its
benefits secured to them by the bestowment of the special
influence of the Spirit, while Moderate Calvinists held that
the atonement was of universal sufficiency but of limited
efficiency. Notwithstanding this departure from the Con-
fessional position, the views of Dr. Wardlaw gradually
TWO DISRUPTIONS 127
found acceptance among Scottish Congregationalists, although
some of the older ministers continued to adhere to the
Calvinistic view of a limited atonement. Had such men as
the Haldanes remained among them no doubt there would
have been a new rupture among the churches over Dr.
Wardlaw's views, for they were vehemently assailed by both
Mr. Eobert and Mr. James Haldane in works written by
them ; but their influence had for a long period ceased to
have any effect on those with whom they had formerly
been in fellowship.
In 1842 the Eev. John Kirk, Congregational minister
at Hamilton, published a series of addresses entitled " The
Way of Life made Plain," in which he set forth views
regarding the work of the Holy Spirit in connection with
the conversion of the sinner which he had been preaching
for some time prior to this. He held that " not only
did Jesus die for every man, but that God's Spirit strives
with every man, and that they who yield are the saved, and
that they who resist are the unsaved." He thus held that
the influence of the Spirit was as universal as the atone-
ment of Christ. This was a view that had been strenuously
opposed by Dr. Wardlaw and those who with him had been
led to accept the position of Moderate Calvinists. So
strongly was this view held by them that it was adduced
in proof of their continued adherence to the main doctrines
of the Westminster Confession concerning Divine sove-
reignty, election, etc., in regard to which they were at
one with the Presbyterians. The promulgation of the
" new views," as they were called, concerning the univer-
sality of the Spirit's work called forth much opposition on
the part of Congregationalists, and many pamphlets and
tracts were written at the time in condemnation of the
doctrines taught by Mr. Kirk and others. The situation
was one which was very perplexing to Congregationalists.
Not bound by subscription to any doctrinal creed, and not
having any ecclesiastical organisation or machinery enabling
them to prosecute for what many of them might regard as
heresy, each church was free and independent of the others
128 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
in regard to the religious doctrines it might hold or teach.
There was only one course of action open to them in
dealing with serious differences of belief on important
doctrines, and this became possible owing to the fraternal
relations in which they stood to one another. Although not
connected with each other by their professed or formal
adherence to any doctrinal creed, there had been a general
consensus of belief in regard to the leading doctrines of the
Christian faith, and this general agreement made it possible
for them to co-operate in promoting and supporting the
work of the Congregational Union and the Theological
Academy. Out of this common co-operation there grew a
feeling of Christian " fellowship " between the churches
which led them to regard themselves, if not a denomina-
tion in the Presbyterian sense, at least what they called a
" connection " (a designation which was commonly used
many years ago), or a congeries of churches holding certain
beliefs and promoting certain practical objects in common.
Had the " New Views " been regarded as involving differ-
ences of opinion only on matters of minor importance, or
had the churches been prepared to regard them as a matter
for Christian forbearance, their fellowship and co-operation
would not have been seriously affected. But, as the dis-
cussion on both sides proceeded, it became evident that
there was a divergence of belief which was regarded by
both parties as so seriously affecting the work, which was
regarded as of primary importance by all of them — that of
the preaching of the Gospel — that active fellowship and
co-operation had become impracticable ; at least, this was
the view of some at the time, especially of those who
opposed the new teaching. The first step taken which had
the effect of disclosing the rupture which had taken place
between the two parties was the action of the committee
of the Glasgow Theological Academy. Having learned
that some of the students attending the Academy were
suspected of having adopted, or at least of being inclined
to adopt, the views of the Eev. John Kirk on the work of
the Spirit, the tutors of the Academy prescribed sermon-
TWO DISRUPTIONS 129
exercises to the students bearing on the doctrines in
dispute. Several of them having given discourses showing
that they were favourable to the " New Views," the com-
mittee felt bound to deal further with them by requesting
each of them to give answers to three questions which were
prescribed. The first was put with the view of ascertaining
whether any change had taken place in their views on the
subject of " divine influence " since they entered the
Academy. The second was as follows : " Do you hold, or
do you not, the necessity of a special influence of the Holy
Spirit, in order to the regeneration of the sinner, or his
conversion to God, distinct from the influence of the Word
or of Providential circumstances, but accompanying these
means, and rendering them efficacious ? " The third ques-
tion was put with the view of ascertaining whether the
views of the students on the subject of the second query
were " settled," or whether they were in a state of indeci-
sion and desirous of time for further consideration of the
subject. The answers were varied in their tone and
expression, but the result of consideration of them by the
committee was that they adopted several resolutions, one of
which was that the names of nine of the students should
be erased from the roll of the Academy, but that some of
them having expressed a desire for more time to consider
the doctrines in question, a sub-committee was appointed
" to converse with such of them as desired it for maturing
and settling their views," it bemg understood that they
would be re-ehgible when they came to " the profession
of sentiments in accordance with the understood principles
of the Congregational body." In vindication of their action
one of the resolutions adopted by the committee, and read
to the students, was to the effect that the doctrines of
personal election to eternal life, and of the necessity of a
special influence of the Holy Spirit in the conversion of
sinners, as following up and effecting the sovereign purpose
of electing grace, having been among the " things most
surely believed" by the members of the Congregational
body, it would have been an evident dereliction of their
I
130 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
trust for the committee to have received into the Academy
or to have retained in it as students any brethren holding
views at variance with those mentioned.
About a month after the above action by the committee
of the Theological Academy — in May, 1844 — seven of the
nine students whose connection with the Academy had been
severed applied to the committee of the Congregational
Union to be employed as preachers in connection with the
Union, but that committee declined to entertain the applica-
tion " until they had satisfied the Academy committee." In
vindication of this action it was subsequently stated that
" the Congregational Union committee, accustomed to act
in harmony and co-operation with the committee of the
Academy, discern in this decision no violation of their com-
mission ; but, having the same conviction with that
committee of the views which have been, until now, held
by the Congregational churches, see no reason why they
should run in the face of their determination, and wantonly
thwart their brethren in the discharge of a painful and
difficult duty" The action of the Union Committee is
worthy of note, because, with the exception of a resolution
proposed by the Eev. Dr. Alexander a year later at one of
the meetings of the Union, it was the only part taken by
the Union or its committee in connection with the con-
troversy which took place on the " new views." Dr.
Alexander's proposed resolution, which was adopted by the
annual meeting of the Union in 1845, while no doubt
intended to reaffirm the adherence of the churches of the
Union to the views of the Spirit's work usually held by
Moderate Calvinists, was so expressed that many, if not all,
of those holding the " new views " could have supported it,
for there was a careful avoidance of any expression of the
distinctive difference between the old and the new doctrines.
The supporters of the Union evidently thought it well
not to interfere in connection with differences of doctrinal
opinion among them, but that the churches feeling them-
selves affected by such differences should take such action as
they thought proper. In only two instances was this done
TWO DISRUPTIONS 131
— in the case of the four Congregational churches then
existing in Glasgow and the Congregational churches in
Aberdeen. The former sent a letter to each of the churches
in Hamilton, Bellshill, Bridgeton (Glasgow), Cambuslang,
and Ardrossan, in which they asked for a statement of their
views on the work of the Holy Spirit in conversion and on
the doctrine of election, with the view of enabhng them to
decide whether or not they could continue to hold fellow-
ship with them as sister Congregational churches. In this
letter two questions were put, viz., " Do you hold that the
influence which the Holy Spirit exerts in the conversion of
sinners is a general, and in no case a special, influence ? —
meaning by general that the Spirit's influence is put forth
upon all alike who hear the Gospel, and that no more or
other divine influence is exerted on those who believe the
Gospel than on those who reject it. Have you ceased to
hold the doctrine of personal and unconditional election ? —
meaning by that the sovereign and gracious choice of
individuals to eternal life by God." Replies to these
queries, with rejoinders from the four churches, were given
at great length. The unhappy result of the controversy
was that the " Four Churches in Glasgow " felt compelled
to withdraw from fellowship with the churches with which
they had corresponded. A pamphlet was subsequently
published, extending to 190 pages, giving " The Entire
Correspondence between the Four Congregational Churches
in Glasgow and the Congregational Churches at Hamilton,
Bellshill, Bridgeton, Cambuslang, and Ardrossan on the
Doctrines of Election and the Influence of the Holy Spirit
in Conversion."
A similar correspondence took place between the Congre-
gational churches in Aberdeen and the Congregational
churches in Blackhills (now Westhill) and Printfield (now
Woodside), with the same result — that the former churches
declared themselves out of fellowship with the latter.
The reasons given for the publication of the correspond-
ence were (1) that the Congregational churches throughout
Scotland misht know the whole grounds on which the four
132 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
churches in Glasgow declined to hold further fellowship
with the churches in their neighbourhood, and that thereby
the other churches might have a full supply of evidence on
which to judge and to act with regard to the five churches ;
(2) that the correspondence might show to churches of
other denominations that the Congregational churches held
" correct sentiments relative to fundamental truths," and
that their principles of church-polity were quite competent
to maintain in their communion purity of doctrine ; and (3)
that by publishing the letters the " errors " which had been
extensively spread by the pastors and churches holding them
might be more efficiently met and exposed than perhaps by
any other means.
Apart from the doctrinal points and the differences ex-
hibited in this controversy, the discussion of which would
be beside the purposes of this history, there are some con-
siderations of a practical nature that may here be noted.
1. The controversial correspondence was throughout con-
ducted in a fine Christian spirit and with great courtesy on
both sides, which left no cause for embittered feeling, but
enabled brethren to part company with mutual respect,
while each party firmly adhered to its own position.
2. The moving causes of the difference of views between
the two parties were such as were directly connected with
the earnest practical work in which preachers on both sides
were engaged. The discussions that took place were by no
means of an exclusively theoretical or academic nature, but
involved issues bearing on the question of the proper
presentation of the Gospel of Christ to men. On the one
hand, the supporters of the " new views " felt bound to give
special prominence in their teaching to the doctrine that,
through the provisions made by the death of Christ for all
men and the equally universal influence of the Spirit on the
minds and hearts of those who heard the Gospel, every
obstacle to the conversion and salvation of the sinner had
been removed save his own unbelief. On the other hand,
the supporters of the Calvinistic view gave prominence to
the doctrine of the absolute sovereignty of God in His
TWO DISRUPTIONS 133
purpose to bestow upon individual men the Holy Spirit,
whose inner operations on their minds and hearts effectually
led them to believe in Christ, and thus to be saved. The
one party appeared to be anxious to insist on the responsi-
bility of men for their belief or unbelief, while the other
sought to exalt the sovereign power of God at every step in
the conversion and salvation of men. Neither view was so
presented by the more intelligent and able of the disputants
as to exclude the other, though at times words were used
that gave occasion for the impression that the one party
virtually denied the work of the Holy Spirit and that the
other virtually set aside the freeness of the Gospel offer of
salvation and the responsibility of those who failed to accept
it. In both instances this arose from a misunderstanding,
for both parties affirmed the necessity of the Divine in-
fluence of the Holy Spirit in order to conversion, the
sovereign grace of God in bestowing the gift of the Spirit,
and the responsibility of men for rejection of the offer of
salvation. Whatever judgment may be passed on the whole
controversy, it is but fair to the memory of the brethren
who engaged in it to keep in mind that they did so in the
sincere belief that they were bound to defend what they
believed to be aspects of Divine truth which had a vital
bearing on their work as preachers of the Gospel.
3. The question arises, Was the difference of view between
the one party and the other such as necessarily led to the
rupture of fellowship between them ? This question may
be said to have divided the churches and ministers of the
time in their opinions even more than the points in dispute.
Evidently the four churches in Glasgow took their action,
both in withdrawing from fellowship with neighbouring
churches and in publishing their " correspondence," in the
expectation that other Congregational churches would take
a similar course. Only in the case of the Aberdeen
churches was this done. The protest made by several of
the respondent churches against the view that any difference
of opinion on the questions in dispute should be made a
ground of separation from fellowship, seeing that hitherto
134 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
the chief thing sought in the case of applicants for member-
ship was that " they had peace with God through our Lord
Jesus Christ," was one the force of which was felt by many
who did not sympathise with the " new views " party.
This was notably the case with Dr. Alexander, whose
" Counsels " to his church (afterwards published) on the
proper attitude of the churches in regard to the whole
dispute had much influence in determining the decision
of other churches to take no action in the matter. His
view may be stated in his own words: "Whether I am
right or wrong in thinking that the views of the churches
which have been separated from their sister churches in the
west tend to Arminianism, is to me a small matter. What
I conceive of moment is the fact that these churches avow
their belief in the sovereign agency of the Spirit in con-
version and sanctification ; and where this avowal is made I,
for one, must deprecate the principle that the holding along
with this of views which by a clear-thinking and keen
logician may be shown to be not perfectly harmonious with
it is to be made an occasion for one church's dissolving
fellowship with another. Oh, when will controversialists
learn that a man is responsible morally only for the opinions
he knowingly holds, not for every conclusion which a more
acute man than he may deduce or extort from his opinions ?
When will churches remember that excommunication for
opinions merely was unknown in Christ's church until
introduced by the ' man of sin ? ' " That this view of the
situation was adopted by the churches, with one or two
exceptions, was an indication that in separating themselves
from neighbouring churches on the ground of difference of
opinion on the doctrinal questions in dispute the churches
in Glasgow and Aberdeen stood alone. The other churches
of the connection tacitly agreed to let any difference on the
points in dispute be a matter of Christian forbearance.
4. Two of the reasons given for the publication of the
" Entire Correspondence," etc., were evidently also reasons
for the action taken by the four Glasgow churches in
severing their connection with neighbouring churches. One
TWO DISRUPTIONS 135
was that " other Christian denominations " might be re-
assured of the " orthodoxy " of Congregationalists, and the
other was that Congregational principles of church-polity
were " quite competent to maintain purity of doctrine." It
is perhaps not too much to say that both these expectations
failed to be realised, so far as the action of the Glasgow
churches was concerned. Instead of securing a doctrinal
declaration on the points in dispute by the Congregational
churches in Scotland the Glasgow and Aberdeen churches
found themselves alone, and the very smallness of their
number had a result the very reverse of what was expected,
by tending to cast doubt upon the so-called " orthodoxy "
of those who did not adhere to them in their action. One
practical lesson may be learned from this, and that is, that
to ground any action of our churches by a regard to what
persons of other denominations may think of us, or to he
over-sensitive to their views of the teaching given in our
pulpits, indicates not only great moral weakness but also
lack of confidence in our own beliefs. The reputation of
any religious body is in its own keeping, and in the
faithfulness with which it adheres to the truths its
members profess to believe. The expectation that Con-
gregational polity would be shown to be " competent
to maintain purity of doctrine " was also falsified by the
event, if by " purity of doctrine " be meant the particular
views of the Glasgow churches in regard to the work of
the Spirit, for the action of these churches only exposed the
weakness of Congregational polity when the attempt is
made to apply it to cases of doctrinal difference. It has
neither the doctrinal " standards " nor the ecclesiastical
machinery requisite for such an application. The fact that
the result of the action of the four churches was to sever
their fellowship with a few neighbouring churches and to
leave the other churches in passive inaction regarding the
matter only served to show that, while Congregational
polity is quite competent to regulate the relations to each
other of Christian men united in their common faith in
Christ as their Saviour, it is a clumsy and inefficient
136 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
instrument in dealing with differences of opinion and
belief which do not affect the vital faith of Christian men,
on which alone their real fellowship must be grounded.
One happy result of the controversies of the time with
which we are dealing was that they served to clear the air,
and became an education and a warning to the churches in
regard to their proper relations to each other. The " new
views " controversy died away in course of time, partly by
ministers and churches finding the unprofitableness of such
discussions as had disturbed their peace, and partly owing
to the increased favour with which the opinions of the " new
views" party came to be held. There was no formal
indication of a departure from the Calvinistic position held
in former days ; but in the pulpits of the churches and
among the members it became increasingly evident that the
old differences, which had never been very pronounced except
among the ministers, had ceased to exist, and that, both in
regard to the universal atonement of Christ and the work
of the Spirit in conversion, the formerly divided parties had
become practically one.
James Morison, D.D., i8i6-iS
CHAPTER XIII.
THE EVANGELICAL UNION, i
The religious movement which issued in the formation of
the Evangelical Union of Scotland had its centre and source
in James Morison of Bathgate, son of the Eev. Eobert
Morison, minister of the Secession Church of that place.
After the son had passed, with success and distinction,
through his studies in the Edinburgh University and the
classes of the Theological Hall of the Secession Church, he
became a probationer of the Church of his fathers, and was
sent to the out-of-the-way place in the north of Aberdeen-
shire called Cabrach. No sooner had he taken up his abode
in his new home — composed of a "but and a ben" — than he
commenced his labours on Sabbaths and week-days among
the rural and scattered population. Under his ministry
a revival took place which sprang out of a revival in his
own heart. He seldom preached without leading some to
inquire after salvation, and how they might be right with
God. This led Mr. Morison to betake himself to the study
of the Gospel, for the proclamation of which he had devoted
his Hfe. As a student, he had given much of his time to
the study of the works of the great theologians, ancient and
modern, especially those of the early fathers ; but he had
not, with practical earnestness of purpose, examined the
declarations of the Lord and His Apostles as to what con-
stituted the glad tidings of great joy, which when believed
^ By Rev. William Adamson, D.D.
137
138 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
would save the soul and lead to holiness of life. To his
surprise, and unspeakable delight, he found that the Gospel
had been specially defined by the Apostle Paul in the L5th
Chapter of the First Epistle to the Corinthians, 3rd and 4th
verses. Tliis led him to further thought and the important
discovery that as there was a gospel for every creature
it must be true that Christ died for the sins of all men
and not for the sins of an elect number only. He further-
more perceived, that as all who heard the Gospel were
bound to beheve it, they were naturally enabled to do
so. No sooner was he convinced of these fundamental doc-
trines than he was ushered into a new region of religious
thought and experience. The Fatherhood and universal love
of God, the world-embracing atonement of the Lord Jesus
Christ, and the willingness of God that all men should be
saved, were seen to be Bible truths which the servants of
the Master were bound to make known. From that moment
they became the burden of all his sermons and addresses,
and produced most wonderful results. A wide-spread
religious awakening took place in the whole neighbourhood,
and many became new creatures in Christ Jesus. The
meetings increased, the little chapel was crowded, the barns
were crammed with eager listeners, and the whole district
was so deeply stirred that the concerns of the soul became
the chief topic of conversation.
After labouring with zeal and success in various places in
the north Mr. Morison received and accepted a call to
Clerk's Lane Secession Church, Kilmarnock, to which he was
inducted on the first Sabbath of October, 1840. The gospel
which had been honoured of the Spirit in the north was the
instrument he used in his new charge. He preached with
all the energy of a young and cultured minister who had a
passion for souls and a supreme desire to promote the glory
of the Saviour. The theological position he had reached at
that time — though he advanced beyond it afterwards — was
that of Gilbert, Wardlaw, and the Independents generally.
He was a Moderate Calvinist, and held the doctrines of
universal atonement, human ability to believe the gospel.
THE EVANGELICAL UNION 139
along with the doctrine of eternal and unconditional election
and irresistible grace. By the force of conviction he had,
unwittingly to himself, departed from the teachings of the
subordinate standards of his Church, the Westminster Con-
fession of Faith.
For this departure he was arraigned at the bar of the
Kilmarnock Secession Presbytery on the 2nd day of March,
1841. After a prolonged and animated discussion a motion was
passed by a majority of fifteen that " the Presbytery shall
admonish Mr. Morison, and suspend him from the exercise
of his ministry and the fellowship of the Church ; aye, and
until he retract his errors and express his sorrow for the
offence given to the brethren in the Church by the propaga-
tion of these errors."
Mr. Morison appealed against this decision to the Synod
which met in Glasgow that year, and the trial of the case
commenced on the 8th of May in Dr. Beatie's church. The
proceedings from beginning to end were of the most
exciting description. All the leading ministers of the
Secession Church took part in the discussion, and Mr.
Morison supported his appeal in an eloquent and powerful
address which lasted eight hours. A newspaper of the
period said : " In so far as the interests of the Secession
Church, and of religion generally is concerned, a more
important cause was never before tried in Scotland." After
attempting, by means of a committee, to get Mr. Morison
to change his views, and on his declining to be so treated,
the Synod finally " declared that he was no longer con-
nected with the United Secession Church," and " that all
ministers and preachers in this Church must consider them-
selves prohibited from preaching for Mr. Morison, or
employing him in any of their public ministrations."-^ But
none of these things moved him, for he knew he preached
nothing but the gospel which the Holy Spirit made known
1 For a full and detailed account of the trials of Mr. Morison before the
Presbytery and Synod, see Hiatory of the Evangelical Union, by Eev.
Dr. Fergus Ferguson, and The Life of Priiicipal Morison, by Kev. Dr.
William A damson.
140 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
in the sacred word, and which had proved itself to be the
power of God unto salvation in the case of hundreds who
heard it from his lips.
The Eev. Eobert Morison, father of the Kilmarnock
pastor, sympathised with his son in his contentions, and had
been blessed by his ministry. Having made known his
position, he was unceremoniously brought before the Synod
in 1842, and declared no longer a minister of the Secession
Church. Meanwhile the Eev. A. C. Eutherford, Falkirk,
and the Eev. John Guthrie, M.A., Kendal, had protested
against the decisions of the Synod in the case of the
Morisons, and were treated in like manner by the
court of 1843. The churches of the four pastors so far
adhered to them, and to them they continued to minister
with renewed spiritual power. Each church became a
centre of evangelistic influence and effort, and an
extensive religious awakening was experienced among the
members, and in the neighbourhood in which they were
placed.
The controversies through which the four pastors passed,
led them to take an important step theologically. They
found by the arguments brought against them and by
systematic study of the Scriptures, that the ground they
occupied during their trials before the Synod was not, on
the whole, so secure and Scriptural as they imagined it was.
This was decidedly true of the leading spirit of the four,
and ultimately he was forced to abandon the last distinc-
tive Calvinistic doctrine to which he clung. From Moderate
Calvinism, Mr. Morison and the others named advanced to
the doctrines of universal atonement, universal and resistible
grace of the Holy Spirit, conditional election, and limited
foreordination. By the proclamation of these doctrines
from the pulpit and by the press an extensive interest was
excited, more particularly in the west of Scotland. The
" new views " were welcomed by large numbers, who left the
churches where the doctrines of the Confession were preached,
and were formed into groups for the study of the Bible and
the preaching of the Gospel. In order that the movement
THE EVANGELICAL UNION 141
might not run to seed, and might be made permanently-
useful, some organisation was seen to be necessary.
After much consultation and prayer it was determined to
hold a meeting of the expelled pastors and representatives
of their churches to consider how best to consolidate the
movement. The meeting was held in the vestry of Clerk's
Lane Church, Kilmarnock, on the 16th day of May, 1843,
and was attended by thirteen persons — four ministers, one
evangelist, and eight elders — representing three churches
and two preaching stations. The Eev. Robert Morison,
being senior minister, was called to preside, and the Eev.
John Guthrie, M.A., acted as clerk. The meeting having
been formally constituted, Mr. James Morison introduced
the business by submitting for the consideration of the
brethren a statement of the basis and objects of the pro-
posed association. The statement was examined with the
greatest care sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph,
and as a whole. Finally it was unanimously adopted and
agreed to be issued as a manifesto. Its introductory para-
graphs run thus :
" We, the undersigned Christian Brethren, representatives
of Christian Churches, and others, having met together at
Kilmarnock, May 16th, 17th, and 18th, 1843, for the pur-
pose of praying and conferring together about the best
means of being useful in the service of our dear Eedeemer,
have agreed to form ourselves into an association under the
designation of ' Evangelical Union.'
" The objects of our Union are mutual countenance,
counsel, and co-operation in supporting and spreading the
glorious, simple, soul-savmg and heart-sanctifying ' gospel of
the grace of God.'
" The nature of our Union is strictly voluntary.
" The members of our Union comprise all brethren who
choose to be associated with us, who have ' peace with God,'
and give decided evidence of being ' new creatures in Christ
Jesus,' and who can concur with us in the following great
principles, which great principles constitute the basis of our
Union."
142 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Then follows a statement of the doctrines or principles
which were to constitute the basis of the Union. These
are summed up in the following :
" We hold that the Bible is the Book of God, and that,
amongst other important truths, it reveals to us,
" 1st, God's character as our Sovereign Governor.
" 2nd, Our duty as the subjects of His government.
" 3rd, Our state and character as rebels against the
authority of His government. And,
" 4th, The way of salvation by which we and all our
fellow-rebels may be delivered from the penal and demor-
alising consequences of our rebellion."
These general principles are explained at some length and
the doctrines athrmed of the universality of the atonement,
the universality and moral nature of the influences of the
Holy Ghost, and the simplicity of faith, which by means of
its object, brings peace to the conscience and purity to the
heart. Brief paragraphs follow as to the nature and
o-overnment of a church. From these it is most manifest
they had departed from the Presbyterial idea of a church
and government. This did not prove itself to be favour-
able to liberty of conscience and brotherly love in their
experience, and would have its effect on their views as to
what a church should be and how it should be governed.
It was therefore declared :
" That in reference to the edification and usefulness of the
believer, we hold it to be his duty to associate with other
believers in the same locality, for the purpose of securing to
one another mutual counsel, exhortation, warning, and
edification (Heb. iii. 13).
" Believers thus associated constitute a church (Gal. i. 2).
" Every church thus constituted we conceive to be
complete within itself — a separate church of Christ, over
which no adjoining church or churches have any other
liberty of control than that of Christian counsel and warning.
" Every such church is bound to admit none to its
fellowship but such as enjoy ' peace with God,' and give
evidence of being ' new creatures in Christ Jesus.' "
THE EVANGELICAL UNION 143
" The Statement of Principles," both as to doctrine and
polity, was not written in a formal and dogmatic style.
The contents of the manifesto are more like an explanatory
address, with Scripture proofs, than a systematic deliverance
regarding beliefs. Prefixed to the whole is a Note which
manifests the position occupied by those who put it forth.
The Note says :
" We wish it to be distinctly understood that the
following statement of great principles is not to any
degree, or in any sense, to be regarded as a permanent
or present Standard Book in the churches with which we
are connected ; neither is it to be a test or term of com-
munion in any of these churches. The Bible is the only
standard book which we recognise, and to no other standard
book whatsoever can we subscribe."
The position thus laid down, the Evangelical Union ever
adhered to. Formal subscription to a creed was never
demanded from any of its members. It reserved to itself
the power of issuing a doctrinal declaration when it was
thought needful to do so in the interests of the Gospel.
This power was exercised in the year 1858, when a
" Doctrinal Declaration," written by the Eev. John Guthrie,
M.A., and adopted by the Conference, was issued. Care
was taken, in the preface of this document, to state
that it was not a formal creed but a declaration of the
faith of the members of the Conference which sent it
forth. It became, however, an exceedingly useful deliver-
ance, being used as a text-book in many Bible classes, and
was the means of dissipating much of the darkness which
prevailed as to what the churches of the Evangelical Union
believed and taught.
From this it will be seen that it was not originally
intended by the founders of the Evangelical Union that it
should be a denomination, a sect, or a separate church.
Individuals could become members no matter to what
section of the Christian Church they might belong. " We
hail," said the founders of the Union, " as ' true yoke
fellows ' all of every name and denomination who wish the
144 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
pleasure of the Lord to prosper and who have peace with
God, and evidence their possession of this peace by the
purity and spirituahty of their lives." In the addresses
delivered at this time it was said they could take in the
Bishop with his clergy, the Moderator with his Assembly or
Synod, and the Congregational Union with all its ministers
and members. " It had room and to spare for them all,"
said the Eev. John Guthrie in one memorable address, and
his words revealed the sentiment which then commonly
prevailed. But this condition of things could not continue
long. The logic of events was too powerful for their large-
hearted intentions and desires to be unsectarian. Churches
were formed to preach and defend their theological views,
and these soon became distinct from all others, which
necessitated more organisation in the Evangelical Union,
which ultimately determined its development into a de-
nomination as clearly marked off from other Christian
churches as any in the land.
The Evangelical Union had another object in view than
that of the mutual aid and encouragement of its members.
It was constituted " also for the purpose of training up
spiritual and devoted young men to carry on and to carry
forward the work and pleasure of the Lord." At the first
meeting held, attention was especially directed to the subject
of training up young men for the work of the ministry.
To this the brethren felt that they were urgently called.
Infant churches were rising — applications were being made,
more than could be met — and besides, in the several
churches there were a few young men of decided talent
and piety who were eager to devote themselves to the work
of the ministry. In these circumstances it was deemed
advisable to take measures without delay ; and after solemn
deliberation it was unanimously agreed that a Theological
Seminary be established in Kilmarnock, under the superin-
tendence of brother James Morison ; and that the brethren
recommend to the several churches of the Union that speedy
efforts be made to obtain the requisite funds for supporting
it, as well as for carrying out the other objects of the Union.
THE EVANGELICAL UNION 145
Mr. Morison undertook the duties without fee or reward,
and discharged them with consummate ability and in the
most self-sacrificing spirit. Students increased, and in a
few years the Eev. John Guthrie was associated with Mr.
Morison, and conducted the class of Systematic Theology.
The Kilmarnock Theological Academy was thus originated
by and remained an integral part of the Union, and to this
fact may be traced much of its success and of the brotherly
feeling which characterised its ministers. The students
were the Union's students, recognised, watched over, and
encouraged as such. When they finished their curriculum
of study at the University and Theological Hall they were,
after examination as to their spiritual state and fitness for
the work of the ministry, ordained as probationers by the
Conference, and recommended to the churches as those "not
only qualified as preachers of the Gospel of the grace of
God, but also fitted and furnished to take the oversight of
any Christian Church to which in the providence of God
they might be called." The Academy — afterwards called
Hall — -was in very truth an Alma Mater and the most cared
for of all the institutions of the Union. It never wanted
a goodly number of students, who loved and were much
benefited by their professors.
It was also arranged that there should be an Annual
Meeting of the members of the Union to hear reports from
churches and to transact what business required to be done.
The meeting was designated the Evangelical Union Confer-
ence, and was presided over by a President selected by the
members. Its membership was to consist " of delegates
from the churches of the Evangelical Union, and Evangelical
Union pastors of churches, every church being entitled to
send two delegates." The condition of membership was
never changed, and though it is rather peculiar in one or
two of its provisions, it was practically a success. Thus,
for example, pastors of other churches than those of the
Union had a seat in the Conference, and this was found to
add to the strength, and not to the detriment of the
brotherhood. Indeed, in the circumstances of the churches
K
146 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
and pastors, it was the wisest course that could have been
adopted, and contributed not a little to the growth of the
denomination.
The Conference originated all the institutions connected
in any way with the Union, and controlled them all, with
the exception of the Ministers' Provident Fund, which is
managed by its members. These different departments of
work, such as the Theological Hall, Home Mission, Augmen-
tation of Stipend Fund, Chapel Debt and Building Fund,
Temperance, Sabbath School, Foreign Mission, Publications,
and others, were committed to the care of special com-
mittees appointed by and responsible to the Conference, to
which they reported at the annual business meeting. All
financial matters were also under its control, and the detail
of income and expenditure was submitted annually for its
consideration and approval. It also appointed a Commis-
sion as a " General Committee for taking up any matters
that may occur in the interval of the meetings and may
not admit of delay, and to watch over the interests of the
Union generally."
It will be thus seen that the Conference exercised con-
siderable power, and that its organisation was more elaborate
than that which obtains in other ecclesiastical Unions com-
posed of Independent churches. This is true ; but it is
also true that in no single case did the Conference seek to
exercise the slightest control over the internal management
of any of the churches connected with it. The principle
upon which it ever acted was that of recognising that no
one had a right to interfere with the government of a
church, with a pastor or its members, though it recognised
that, as members of the Union, and in relation thereto, it
had a right to interfere if need be. The Commission was
on more than one occasion appealed to to adjudicate regard-
ing differences in churches, arising from various causes; but
in no case did it accede to the appeal, except when re-
quested to do so by both parties concerned. Once or twice
it was called upon to use its good offices, and to protect its
influence and good name when likely to be injured, but
THE EVANGELICAL UNION 147
even in these proceedings there was no interfering with the
full liberty Independent churches and pastors so love to
possess and exercise.
As illustrative as to how the Conference acted in
reference to ministers who had joined other ecclesiastical
bodies, the cases of those who became identified with the
Catholic Apostolic Church may be cited. Between the
years 1869 and 1877 a few of the pastors of the Evangelical
Union churches became members of the Catholic Apostolic
Church, and were publicly identified with it. The churches
to which they ministered objected to their remaining as
their pastors, and asked them to retire, which they did.
How should these brethren be treated by the Union ? was
a question which the Commission and the Conference had
to consider. They would not resign their membership, for
one of the principles of the sect is that they can be bo7ia-
fide members of the Catholic Apostolic Church, and yet
remain ministers or members of other Christian communions*
How to deal with such brethren was a matter of serious
moment to Evangelical Unionists, who were lovers of
ecclesiastical liberty and defenders of the right of private
judgment, and yet at the same time desirous to keep the
unity of the spirit in the bond of peace. After long and
prayerful consideration of the whole facts of the case of
the Eev. John Andrew, Eeform Street Church, Dundee —
the first required to be dealt with — the Commission agreed
to recommend the Conference of 1869 to adopt the follow-
ing resolution :
" That the Eev. John Andrew, having first submitted
to and then identified himself with the Catholic Apostolic
Church, the Commission resolve that his subjection to such
an authority is incompatible with his continuing a member
of the Evangelical Union, and recommend the Conference
to authorise the President to remove Mr. Andrew's name
from the roll of ministers."
The Eev. Professor Kirk moved the adoption of the
resolution, which was seconded by Eev. J. Guthrie and
unanimously agreed to.
148 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Similar resolutions were passed in reference to the Rev.
Hugh Stewart in 1870 and the Eev. E. C. Leal in 1877.
The action taken by the Conference in these cases was
approved of by the whole denomination, and did not, it was
held, violate the principles upon which the Union was
founded. The ministers dealt with ceased to be pastors of
churches which were connected or affiliated with the Evan-
gelical Union and joined a church which held tenets and
was governed by a polity which were opposed to what the
Union believed to be in harmony with the teaching of the
Bible. It was therefore, it was contended, no act of tyranny
or curtailment of liberty to remove their names from the
roll of ministers of the denomination. The case of the Rev.
James Forrest, M.A., occupied the attention of the Com-
mission and Conference in 1885. Some persons outside who
were ignorant of the facts thought that this was a " heresy
hunt," and that Mr. Forrest was expelled from the Evangelical
Union on account of the doctrines he held and preached.
It was not so. The proceedings originated in a Memorial
being presented to the Commission by members of Clerk's
Lane Church complaining of certain statements which
offended them and others on account of the language
employed and the doctrines taught. When the Memorial
was read to the Commission the first question considered
was whether it was within its province to receive and act
upon it. It was at once recognised that the Commission
could not interfere between the pastor and the members of
his church, except on the distinct understanding that both
parties agreed to remit the matter for its consideration and
decision. An elder of the Clerk's Lane Church was a
member of the Commission and both he and Mr. Forrest
had no objection to the Commission taking up and judging
the case. Both parties having agreed to this course, the
matter was gone into fully at various meetings, and ultimately
a finding was arrived at that Mr. Forrest should be coun-
selled to be more careful in his utterances, and in the future
avoid phraseology calculated to wound some of his hearers.
Mr. Forrest appealed to the Conference against the decision
THE EVANGELICAL UNION 149
of the Commission, which, by a large majority, dismissed his
appeal and upheld the right of the Commission to deal with
the case as presented, and endorsed its finding. At the next
Conference the secretary intimated that the Eev. James
Forrest, M.A., and the Church, Clerk's Lane, Kilmarnock,
had withdrawn from the Union, and their names were
accordingly removed from the roll. Mr. Forrest became a
Unitarian, and his church also became identified with that
body. At the time it was said by the leading newspaper
in Glasgow that the Evangelical Union by its action had
shown how to deal with instances where differences of
doctrine occurred without violating the principles of inde-
pendency or of progress. Care was always taken in dealing
with such delicate matters that nothing was done that could
infringe on the liberty of any loyal member of the Union ;
at the same time its right was vindicated to see that none
of its members should compromise its position or weaken its
testimony as a body of Evangelical Christians associated for the
defence and proclamation of the Gospel of the blessed Lord.
Shortly after the first meeting held in Kilmarnock in
1843 an impetus was given to the work of the Union by
the co-operation of a number of ministers and students
who had been dissociated from the Congregational Union
of Scotland. Amongst the most prominent of these were
the Eev. John Kirk, Hamilton; Eev. Fergus Ferguson,
Bellshill; Eev. Peter Mather, Ardrossan ; Messrs. Fergus
Ferguson, Ebenezer Kennedy, James B. Eobertson, and
William Bathgate. Some of these formally joined the
Evangelical Union before their churches did so, the latter
fearing, if they became members, they would lose their
independency. These churches were in most instances
affiliated, and contributed regularly and liberally to the
various funds, and in the minds of the public were
identified with the work and aims of the Union. In the
forties the churches increased in numbers and strength
rapidly. Notwithstanding that the field was occupied almost
entirely by the larger and older denominations, the enter-
prise and vigour of the youngest were manifested in adding
150 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
to its number and influence every year. Only eight
churches formed before 1843 identified themselves in any
way with the Union, and the others had to be gathered in,
organised, and provided for until they were able to be
self-governing. The forward movement was attended to
by the Home Mission Committee, who started new causes
and formed new churches. Scarcely a year passed without
some addition being made to the congregations, which
numbered in the year 1896, when it united with the
Congregational Union, ninety fully organised churches.
Of these, sixty were self-sustaining, and the others
were aided to the extent of three hundred and seventy
pounds. The salaries of the pastors were not what might
be called large, but there were few imder one hundred
poimds per annum, and these, like the other institutions
of the Union, had been growing year by year. The salaries
of pastors in the forties and fifties did not afford a strong
temptation to young men to enter the ministry of the
Gospel in this connection, for not a few of them gave
themselves to the work with a prospect of having little
more than sixty pounds a year. Nevertheless a spirit of
loyalty to the Union and of an earnest desire to advance
the kingdom of God animated the aspirants for the sacred
office, and manifested itself in a praiseworthy manner in
the liberality of the members. A stranger looking on
might think that Evangelical Unionists were narrow in
their sympathies, clannish in their modes of action, so
closely knit together were they in the bonds of brotherly
affection. This arose from the fact that they were to a
considerable extent isolated from other Christians and
viewed as holding doctrines not in harmony with the
orthodox faith of Presbyterian churches. It could be said
of a very truth throughout their history, notwithstanding
they frequently differed one from the other and had occa-
sionally family doctrinal disputes. Behold how these
Christians love one another !
A word may be said as to the way the press was
employed by the ministers and members of the Evan-
THE EVANGELICAL UNION 151
gelical Union in the carrying out of their mission. They
had faith in the power of the press, and used it, we
venture to say, more extensively than any other denomi-
nation in Scotland, according to their numbers. From
the very first the pen and the press were called into
requisition to expound and propagate their views of divine
truth and to defend their theological position. This was
a necessity, because of the opposition from the pulpit and
misrepresentations which privately prevailed, and could
only be successfully met by the printed page. Tracts
without number were written and circulated, pamphlets
by the thousand were scattered abroad, volumes were
published by the score, and periodical literature was started
and carried on with vigour. A monthly, The Day Star,
was issued, which had a large circulation in all parts of
the English-speaking world for nearly half a century. The
Deivdrop, a halfpenny monthly for children, had also a
large circulation, and continued all the time the Union
existed. The Christian Neivs, a weekly newspaper, was
started in the year 1846, and continues to this day, and
is the oldest religious paper in Britain. The Evangelical
Repository, a quarterly magazine of theological literature,
was commenced in 1854, and continued for thirty-four
years. Forward, a monthly, devoted to the exposition of
a Liberal Evangelical Theology, existed for seven years, and
had as contributors some young men whose names are now
amongst the foremost in the literary and theological world.
These periodicals, though devoted to the interests of the Evan-
gelical Union, were not official organs, but were carried on
by private persons, and on that account were more indepen-
dent in their treatment of subjects, and reached a larger class
of readers. The contributors were generally the pastors of
the churches, who rendered freewill service, and felt that
their vocation was not to be only preachers of the Word
by means of the voice, but also preachers by means of the
printed page. Their service was given with right good
will, as unto the Master, and their reward was His smile
and " Well done."
152 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Although there was nothing in the constitution or the
stated objects and aims of the Evangelical Union regarding
temperance, the furtherance of this good cause was viewed
as part of its mission. Without any law demanding ab-
stinence from intoxicating drink on the part of the ministers
or students, it was soon found that they were all abstainers,
and they viewed this as part of practical Christianity. No
licensed liquor-seller was allowed to become a member of
the churches, and if any did become such they were told to
withdraw, or they would be expelled. This action was
taken on the ground that drink-selling was an anti-Christian
trade opposed to the teaching and spirit of Jesus Christ,
and should not be treated as a lawful business. Whether a
drink-seller was a Christian or not they did not judge —
that was a matter between the soul and God — but they had
no hesitation in affirming that the trade was not in harmony
with the mind of Christ, and was a most deadly foe to the
advancement of the Saviour's kingdom in the world. Being
morally wrong, they contended that the drink trade could not
be politically right, and should be put down as a source of
manifold evils by the strong arm of the law. This was the
position taken by the fathers of the Union and endorsed
by the great majority of the members. To the advocacy of
these principles many of the ministers and others devoted
much of their time and energy when other churches looked
with a little suspicion on the whole temperance movement.
That the work and publications of the members of the
Evangelical Union had an effect upon the theology and
religious life of Scotland has been acknowledged by many
competent judges. As we write, the newspapers report a
speech of an influential minister of a Presbyterian church
in Glasgow, in which he says they were much indebted to
the late Principal Morison for the great improvement of the
tone of the pulpit of these days from that of former years.
There was less now of fire and brimstone and more of the
love and kindness of God in Jesus Christ. Others have
borne like testimony, and this has gone far to make up for
the struggles and the sacrifices which were undergone when
THE EVANGELICAL UNION 153
this section of the Christian Church was everywhere spoken
against. Now that it is united with others of like mind,
its churches, ministers, and friends are reconsecrating them-
selves to the work of the furtherance of the kingdom of
God, the saving and sanctifying those for whom Christ died,
and whom the Father, the Son, and the Spirit desire to bless.
EVANGELICAL UNION THEOLOGICAL HALL.i
It was in the month of May, 1843, that the Evangelical
Union was formed in Kilmarnock, and the first session of
the Theological Academy was held the same year, in the
months of August and September, in the same town.
The Eev. James Morison was requested to be professor,
and he continued for fifty years the principal teacher. He
was the originator of the Theological Hall, and took a deep
interest all his life in the training of young men for the
ministry. Having had the advantages of a University
curriculum under distinguished teachers whom he greatly
admired, Mr. Morison had the desire to instruct his students
as efficiently as possible ; and everyone who came under his
influence was impressed with the necessity of education for
the exposition of the Bible. He never lowered his standard,
and was never pleased with less than the best ; but he had
to keep in mind the " supplies " required by students and
churches, and make the most of the men who came to be
trained as preachers. In a session of eight weeks for three
or four years he accomplished by his personal efforts, by his
example and inspiration more than some teachers do in
eight years. He quickened intellectual life by his scholar-
ship and fervent admiration of theology, and united zeal
for study with love for God and man, combining piety with
learning in a degree seldom surpassed. The smallness of
the class never lessened the enthusiasm of the professor.
The attendance at the E.U. Academy for the first ten years
was only 98, for the second ten years 65, and for the third
iBy Rev. Robert Craig, M.A., D.D.
154 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
56. In the first period some students were enrolled who
did not become ministers ; and in the class of 1843 there
were only five regular students, of whom one is still spared
— Eev. Professor Hunter, of Leith — and one, Eev. William
Landels, D.D., joined the Baptists in 1844.
In the class of 1844, held in Kilmarnock, we find the
name of the Eev. Fergus Ferguson, M.A., D.D. In the
class of 18.57 appears the name of the Principal of Mans-
field, Eev. A. M. Fairbairn, M.A., D.D., LL.D. The classes,
1861 to 1865, were the largest in the history of the Evan-
gelical Union. There were 47 enrolled students during
these four years. Dr. Morison was then assisted by other
three Professors : Prof. Kirk taught Pastoral Theology ;
Prof. Taylor, Systematic Theology ; Prof. Hunter, Hebrew ;
Dr. Morison taught Evangelical Theology, and his lectures
on Eomans Third were then delivered.
When Dr. Morison removed from Kilmarnock to
Glasgow the students met in the hall of North Duudas
Street Church, and latterly in 18 Moray Place, Eegent
Park, Glasgow.
For many years the Eev. John Guthrie, M.A., D.D.,
acted as Professor of Old Testament Exegesis, until he ,
accepted a call to London. During periods, when Dr.
Morison was unwell, several ministers were requested to
act as lecturers to the students. In the year 1876 Dr.
Morison resigned his professorship, but was requested by
Conference to continue to act as Principal.
Eev. Eobert Craig, M.A., was appointed in 1876 to the
Chair of New Testament Exegesis and Biblical Criticism,
and acted as Professor till 1879, when he resigned, having
accepted a call to Manchester. By that time Dr. Morison's
health was so far restored that he was able again to take
the Exegetical Chair for some years.
In 1891 Dr. Ferguson was requested to be Professor of
New Testament Exegesis, and he undertook the duties till
1896.
Eev. Alexander M'Nair, M.A., has been Professor of
Hebrew since 1885. The union of the C.U. and the E.U.
THE EVANGELICAL UNION 155
took place in 1896. Dr. Taylor and Prof. M'Nair have
been teaching in the Theological Hall of the Congregational
churches of Scotland since 1897. Dr. Taylor retired in 1899.
During its whole history the session of the E.U. Hall
was only eight weeks in August and September. Dr.
Morison, in adopting the autumn session, followed the
custom of the Secession Hall, in which he was trained.
All the professors have been pastors of churches. At
the time that they were fulfilling the duties of teachers
in the Theological Hall their pulpits were supplied as often
as they desired. The honorariimi given was small, but
the work was done faithfully, and often it was very
laborious. Dr. Morison some years required a written
exercise every day from every student on his exegetical
lectures, and he must have spent hours in the examination
of these papers, marking every error and noting all that
was praiseworthy. The professors were assisted in the annual
examinations for admission by many brethren, to whom
the papers were sent by the Secretary to the Hall. The
amount of theological reading prescribed left the students
few leisure hours. The Committee saw applicants and
heard reports on their studies before they were allowed
to join the Hall. The rule was — four sessions at the
University and five at the Hall. Latterly it was understood
that " if any student desired to finish his course of study at
the close of his fourth academic session he had to stand an
examination in Systematic Theology, Exegesis, Hebrew,
Philosophy, and some prescribed Theological Treatises."
In the fifty-three years from 1843 to 1896, 305 names of
students are found in the List of Alumni. Many of them
have done honourable work as ministers of the Gospel,
and others have devoted themselves to medicine and litera-
ture and commercial life.
Almost all the churches of the Evangelical Union
were content to wait, when there was a vacancy, until
they could find an E.U. student or minister to become their
pastor. They loved the theology of the Evangelical
Union, and preferred ministers who knew it and preached
156 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
it. Most of the students had frequent appointments as
preachers, and acquired power in speaking.
For many years there were no bursaries, and every
student had to support himself. But there was a rare
feeling of comradeship, and every one knew all the rest.
If a man did not love Christ he had no temptation to
seek to be an E.U. student or minister. Many heroic lives
have been spent by those who have felt themselves called
of God to preach the Gospel in the churches of the Evan-
gelical Union, and all the ministers gratefully acknowledge
the education received in the E.U. Hall.
Rev. Robert Morison, 1782-1855. Rev. John Guthrie, D.D., 1814-18
Rev. John Kirk, D.D., 1813-1886.
Rev. Fergus Ferguson, D.D., 1824-1897. Rev. A. M. Wilson, 1820-1888.
CHAPTER XIV.
CARDROSS AND CRANBROOK CASES.
About the year 1861 what was called the " Cardross
Case " was before the Court of Session, and the proceedings
in connection with it furnished a fitting opportunity to
Congregationalists and others not belonging to the Free
Church, which was directly interested in the case, of
showing their opposition to the interference of the civil
courts in the affairs of churches not connected with the
State. The principle involved was one of as large
importance to Congregationalists as to Free Churchmen.
The Rev. Mr. Macmillan, minister of the Free Church
in Cardross, had been found guilty by his Presbytery
of certain charges affecting his moral character. The
case was carried from the Presbytery to the Synod,
and ultimately to the General Assembly, which con-
firmed the judgment of the Presbytery, and suspended
Mr. Macmillan from the ofiice of the ministry sine die.
That gentleman thereupon presented a petition to the
Court of Session praying it to interdict the Assembly from
carrying its sentence into effect. He was then summoned
to appear before the Assembly, and asked whether he had
actually presented the petition referred to. On acknow-
ledging that he had done so, he was, according to what
was alleged to be the law and usage of the Free Church in
such cases, summarily deposed from the ofi&ce of the
ministry. From this sentence Mr. Macmillan appealed to
157
158 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
the Court of Session, asking that the Free Church should
be summoned to produce the sentence of deposition, "to be
seen and considered " by the Lords of Session, that they
might annul or reduce the same. The cases came before
the Lord Ordinary (Benholme) who dismissed it as one
which the civil court was not competent to deal with.
An appeal having been made to the first division of the
Court, both parties were asked to give in minutes setting
forth the admissions they respectively made in regard to
the writings referred to in the proceedings, and whether
they did or did not renounce further " probation." This
having been done, it was expected that judgment would be
pronounced in the case, that is, as to the competence of
the Court to deal with the case ; but instead of that the
Court ordered inquiry to be made whether the Free Church
Assembly (the defenders) would " satisfy production," that
is, produce the two sentences of suspension and deposition
in order to be seen and considered by the Court. The
Assembly, while willing to give information regarding its
procedure in suspending and deposing Mr. Macmillan,
refused to produce its sentences in order that they might
be " seen and considered " with a view to their reduction.
This they did on the ground that the submission to the
Court of the documents by which their judgment as a
church-court took effect, would have been to acknowledge
the right of the civil court to review their decisions, which
would have been contrary to their principles as a body
that claimed entire independence of the civil court in all
spiritual or ecclesiastical acts, save in so far as these involved
a question of pecuniary loss or damage. The right of a
civil court to adjudicate upon a question of damages they
were willing to admit ; but they claimed that no civil
court had a right to review their spiritual or ecclesiastical
acts in themselves, or to annul them.
It may be difficult for those not versed in legal and
ecclesiastical matters to perceive the practical importance of
the questions involved in this case, but ministers and
members of nearly all the non-established churches con-
CARDROSS AND CRANBROOK CASES 159
sidered that the demand of the Court of Session implied the
assertion of its authority to interfere with the exercise of
discipline by free churches. It was on this ground that
many Congregatioualists felt called upon to support the Free
Church in its refusal to acknowledge any such authority.
Their views were expressed by the Eev. Dr. Alexander at a
large public meeting held in Edinburgh on 14th January,
1861, and which was addressed by Drs. Cairns, Cunningham,
Somerville, Goold, and Guthrie. The following is an extract
from Dr. Alexander's address :
" It may be said, What harm will this claim on the part
of the civil court do you ? If your discipline has been
rightly and justly exercised, that needs only to be shown,
and the court will confirm it ; and, on the other hand, if you
have erred, or acted wrongly, it is surely desirable that your
error should be corrected, and the wrong you have done be
undone by the court. Now, let me say at once that I ask
no exemption from liability to answer in a court of law for
any wrong I have done, either through ignorance or malice,
to any individual in the exercise of church discipline, any
more than I claim such exemption in the case of wrongs I
may do to any one in my personal capacity. But I think
I have a right to demand that whatever becomes of me in
the case of an action against me for an ecclesiastical act, the
sentence I have pronounced shall be allowed to stand intact,
shall abide as res judicata, which no power on earth can
alter or annul but the power by which it was originally
pronounced. With this I cannot consent that any civil
court in the world shall intermeddle. I care not whether
the court shall think fit to confirm or annul it ; in either
case a principle is affirmed and a claim advanced which I
am constrained to repudiate. If the party who has been the
subject of discipline thinks himself wronged or aggrieved in
his civil interest, let him by all means go into the court if
he chooses, and prove his case if he can, and seek redress ;
so far he is within the province of civil jurisdiction. But
if he asks the judge to come into my church, and examine
its proceedings with a view to determine whether these have
160 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
been properly conducted, and whether the sentence which
has been pronounced is one which ought to be allowed to
stand, I then say the judge is asked to go wholly beyond
his power and proper province ; and if he accedes to such a
request I must, with all respect, but very firmly, do the best
I can to shut the door in his face, and keep my church
sacred from such intrusion."
The question as to the right of the court to exercise the
power it claimed was never settled, the appellant having
withdrawn from the case.
In 1866 what was called the " Cranbrook Case" created a
good deal of interest, not only among Congregationalists but
also among Presbyterians and others, who were curious to
know how Congregationalists would deal with a case of
alleged " heresy," as this was. The minister of the Congre-
gational church in Albany Street, Edinburgh, who had at
one time been a Unitarian minister, had for some time been
preaching discourses which, because of the divergence of the
theological opinions set forth in them from those held by
both Congregationalists and Presbyterians, excited great
attention and discussion. Christian people in Edinburgh,
and indeed throughout the country, were startled and pained
at finding a preacher belonging to the Congregational body
uttering sentiments believed to be repugnant to the religious
belief and feeling of Congregationalists on vital points of the
Christian faith. Having no formal creed, and no church-
courts to deal with heresy, but holding by the principle that
every church is independent of external control, both in
regard to its doctrine and the management of its affairs, it
was difficult for Presbyterians, and even for some Congre-
gationalists, to see how ministers and churches of the
Congregational denomination could vindicate their reputation
for orthodoxy while a church remained in their connection
whose pastor's opinions were notoriously heretical, and at
the same time refrain from interfering with the liberty of
the church and its pastor. No case quite similar having
ever been known among Congregational churches in Scot-
land, which had hitherto shown general unanimity in
CARDROSS AND CRANBROOK CASES 161
adherence to vital Christian doctrines and good-fellowship
in their relations to each other, some doubts arose as to the
proper course to take in order to show that in his teaching
Mr. Cranbrook was alone to be held responsible for the
views he had expressed, and that no Congregationalists,
except those who might signify their adherence to his
doctrines, were to be held as sympathising with him. At
length, at a conference of ministers in Edinburgh, it was
agreed that the right course to follow was that those
ministers who had taken part in the public services of Mr.
Cranbrook's " induction " or " recognition," and who had
thereby introduced him to the other churches and ministers
of the denomination, should ask Mr. Cranbrook to meet
them in friendly conference. Dr. Alexander was requested
to send a letter to Mr. Cranbrook, inviting him to the
proposed meeting. In his letter Dr. A. was careful to be
very explicit as to the purpose for which he and his fellow-
ministers sought an interview : " The object they (the
ministers who had been present at the induction service)
have in view in requesting this conference is to ascertain
your views on some points of revealed truth, on which they
have been led to believe that you hold views very different
from those hitherto held and taught in our churches. In
taking this step they do not pretend to assume to control
your liberty of thought and speech. They desire only satis-
faction for themselves, that they may know whether they
can consistently continue to recognise you as a brother
minister." The reply of Mr. Cranbrook showed that he had
quite misapprehended the object the ministers had in view
in inviting him to a friendly conference, for in very sharp
and peremptory terms he declined the invitation to what he
called a " Consistorial Court," in vindication of his " liberty
freely to teach what he had learned of God," and of which
he asserted the ministers were trying their best to deprive
him. In replying to this letter Dr. Alexander pointed out
Mr. Cranbrook's mistake in supposing that the ministers
desired to interfere with his liberty in any way, but simply
wanted satisfaction for themselves that Mr. Cranbrook's
L
162 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
views of Divine truth were the same they were led to
believe they were when they attended and took part in his
induction services, by which they virtually introduced him
to the churches of the denomination as one worthy of their
confidence as a teacher and preacher of the same Gospel in
which they all believed. In a subsequent letter Mr. Cran-
brook asserted that had he known that by being present at
the induction service they claimed the right to interrogate
him as to his doctrinal views, he would then and there have
asked them to withdraw. In making this assertion Mr.
Cranbrook indicated his ignorance of the custom that had
prevailed among the Scottish Congregational churches,
namely, that when ministers were invited to attend an
ordination or induction service they claimed the liberty of
satisfying themselves by personal interview or by perusal of
the statement the minister-elect intended to make at the
service as to whether they could " recognise " him as a
brother minister. This right was used only in cases of
ministers called by a church of whom the invited ministers
had but little knowledge, or of whose belief and teaching
they had doubt. In most cases the ministers present had
had opportunities of personally knowing the teaching of the
minister-elect, either as a student of the Theological Hall or
by his being accredited by other ministers in whom they
had confidence. The mistake of the Edinburgh ministers
was in not asking for a friendly conference with Mr. Cran-
brook before they attended his induction service, and making
clear to him the grounds upon which they were present to
recognise him. But they acted in good faith, believing that,
having been a Congregational minister in good standing
among his brethren in England, they might fairly assume
that his religious beliefs were substantially the same as their
own. The result of the correspondence was that the
ministers " suspended ministerial communion " with Mr.
Cranbrook, on the ground that his published views on some
vital points — especially on prayer — were such as were
utterly at variance with the " things most surely believed "
among them. These views were so pronounced that no
CARDROSS AND CRANBROOK CASES 163
conference with Mr. C. was really required to satisfy the
ministers or any others as to the opinions he held, but they
desired to deal courteously with him in the hope that
possibly he might have some explanations to make which
might modify or remove the unfavourable impressions his
discourses had produced. Mr. Cranbrook's own action shut
out any hope they had in that direction. The action of the
Edinburgh ministers was subsequently vindicated in rather
a painful way. In February of 1867 Mr. C. resigned the
pastorate of the church in Albany Street owing to the
expression of increasing dissatisfaction with his teaching on
the part of many of the congregation. He continued for a
short time to lecture in a hall in Edinburgh, but his spirit
of bitter antagonism to all Christian churches, with which
he declared himself thoroughly disgusted, and his equal
antagonism to many of the most cherished beliefs of Chris-
tian people, were such as to repel rather than attract
hearers. Within a few years after his resignation he died.
CHAPTER XV.
INSTITUTIONS OF CONGEEGATIONAL CHURCHES.
SOCIETIES.
The Congregational and Evangelical Unions and the Theo-
logical Halls have been regarded as the leading institutions
connected with the Congregational churches in Scotland, not
only because their objects and aims have been recognised as
the most important in the interests of the churches, but also
because the money raised for them has been more than for
other objects ; but a sketch of the origin of the other
societies connected with the churches is given here.
In 1820 the Scottish Congeegational Ministers' Widows'
Fund was originated. This was really an extension of the
work of the Congregational Union, with the difference that
whereas the latter was specifically a " church " aid society,
the Widows' Fund was designed to be a Pastoral Aid
Society. It was recognised by those who had a sympathetic
interest in the pastors of the churches and their work that,
although the aid given by the Union had materially relieved
the anxieties of many of the pastors as to the support of
themselves and their families, their incomes were so small as
to make it hardly possible for them to make any provision
for the widows or families they might leave behind them in
the event of their decease. The fact, too, that many worthy
ministers had from time to time been found who were left
in somewhat straitened circumstances when compelled by
164
INSTITUTIONS OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 165
age or infirmity to retire from active service, indicated the
necessity of making provision for such cases. By the small
payment of one guinea yearly each minister was admitted to
the benefits of the Fund. Of course this source of income
was known to be quite insufficient to meet the claims that
were anticipated as likely to be made on the Fund, but it
was expected that contributions from the churches and
individuals would provide an income from which needed
help might be given as necessity for it arose. The Fund
was divided into two branches — an " equitable " and " charit-
able " branch. Under the former each widow or family of
a deceased minister was secured an annuity of £10 ; and
under the latter there was given in addition such sum as
cases of special need might demand, or such an enhancement
of the " equitable " annuity as the state of the funds might
warrant. Grants from the Fund were also made on behalf
of " acred brethren " at the discretion of the committee.
Several changes have been made in the regulation of the Fund
since 1874. In that year it was decided that no further
grants be made to " aged brethren," in view of the pro-
vision made for them by the Congregational Ministers'
Provident Fund, but the claims of members at that date
were reserved. Prior to 1882, ministers leaving Scotland,
and thereby ceasing to be connected with the Fund, had
been entitled to receive back their subscriptions without
interest, but in that year it was decided that in such cases
only two-thirds of the subscriptions should be returned,
reserving the claims of existing members.
Both in regard to its laudable aims and from a financial
point of view, this institution has been one of the most
successful of the societies connected with the churches.
Although the grants "iven to widows and children have
o o o
never been of such an amount as entirely to provide for their
support, they have afforded timely and welcome relief to many
who, but for them, would have felt the pinch of poverty,
and many a worthy pastor who has been unable to provide
for those depending upon him has had his mind relieved by
the assurance that they would receive the aid of this
166 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
benevolent Fund in the event of his death. For many years
the income of the Fund continued to increase year by year,
and enabled its committee to add largely to its capital
account, the interest from which became available as a
further increase, while enabling the committee to deal all
the more liberally with applicants for aid. A large part of
the capital has come from the donations and legacies of
individuals, but for which the income from church contribu-
tions and from members would have come far short of
providing for the expenditure each year. In 1900 the
capital stood at £12,805 6s. lOd., and the widows or children
of twenty-seven pastors were receiving aid from the Fund.
The Scottish Congregational Ministers' Provident
Fund was originated in 1859. The necessity for this Fund
had long been felt. The salaries of most of the pastors
had been so limited as to make it well-nigh impossible for
them to do little more than provide for themselves and for
those dependent on them while engaged in active service.
When overtaken by age or sickness they had therefore to
rely on the kindness of their churches or of benevolent
friends. In not a few cases, also, ministerial brethren felt
themselves compelled to remain at their posts as pastors
when they themselves needed the rest they had earned by
their laborious lives, and when their churches required the
services of younger and more vigorous men to take the
oversight of them. It was for the sake of both pastors and
churches that the Fund was instituted, and during the forty
years it has been in existence it has done good and timely
service to both. The annuity at first aimed at was £40,
but for many years it has been £60, and is available by
members in case of failing health, or when they reach the
age of 65 years. The income of the Fund has been derived
from subscriptions of beneficiary members of one guinea
annually, subscriptions from churches and individuals, and
interest on invested funds. The latter have now reached
the sum of £16,605 17s. 9d.
The Evangelical Union Ministers' Provident Fund
Society was originated in 1867, with the same object in
INSTITUTIONS OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 167
view as that of the Scottish Congregational Ministers'
Provident Fund, but with the additional object of making
some provision for the widow or children of a deceased
member by a single payment of the sum of £60. The
annual subscription of beneficiary members is £1, and they
become entitled to the benefit of the Fund on reaching the age
of 67 years, or becoming incapacitated for service before
that age. The capital of the Fund in 1900 was £7677 8s. 2d.
Although these two Funds and the Widows' Fund are
under separate management, they may be described as
really auxiliaries of the Congregational Union, their objects
being to aid pastors of churches by providing annuities for
them in their old age or infirm health, and for their widows
after them. If the churches gave salaries to their pastors
which would enable them to make this double provision,
there would be no need for these Funds ; it is only to
supply the lack of the churches that the Funds have
become necessary. Hence the grants of the Congregational
Union under its " church-aid " branch, and the annuities of
the Provident and Widows' Funds, form part of a stipend-
aid scheme in the interests of both churches and ministers.
One regrettable feature of the operations of both Funds is
the small amount of support given them by the churches
for whose sake they are carried on, only a fraction of the
annual income being derived from church-subscriptions.
A little reflection ought to convince members of the
churches that these Funds have the highest claims upon
them for liberal support, seeing that by the provision made
for their ministers and ministers' widows the churches
themselves are thereby relieved to a large extent of the
obligation that primarily falls on them to provide for those
who have given them their strength and labour in the
ministry of the Word.
The Scottish Congkegational Chapel Building Society
originated in 1866, the aim of its promoters having been to
aid in the erection, purchase, alteration, or improvement of
Congregational Chapels throughout Scotland, and to provide
for the extinction of chapel debts. The promoters were
168 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
moved by a desire, not only to aid those who were engaged
in the work of building new places of worship, but also to
relieve pastors and others from the trouble and even
humiliation of going from place to place soliciting aid for
building schemes in connection with their churches. It
was hoped that by having a central fund to which all able
and willing to aid in this important work could send
contributions, the work might be better done, and with less
trouble and anxiety, than by means of begging deputations.
The aid of the Fund is given by means of grants, and of
loans at nominal interest. The amount of the capital of
the Fund is £4101. The income is derived from individual
and church subscriptions, and interest on investments. This
Fund is not yet incorporated with the Congregational Union.
The Chapel Debt and Building Fund in connection
with the Evangelical Union was instituted by the Con-
ference in 1868, "to assist by gifts or loan, without interest,
in defraying chapel debts, and building or repairing places
of worship, belonging to the churches of the Evangelical
Union of Scotland." The objects are here similar to those
of the Scottish Congregational Chapel Building Society.
It is now instituted as one of the societies of the Con-
gregational Union, and a new set of rules was adopted in
1898. In 1899 the capital was £5922 18s. Id.
The Conference of Scottish Congregationalists was
instituted in 1869 with the view of enabling the ministers
and members of the Congregational Union to confer
together on important subjects which at the time were
not regarded as coming within the scope of the Union.
At the meetings of the Conference papers were read and
discussed bearing upon various aspects of church life and
work. Inasmuch, however, as the changes made in the
constitution of the Union allowed of greater latitude in
the selection of topics dealt with at its annual meetings,
the necessity for the Conference came to be less felt than
in former years, and when the union of the Congregational
and Evangelical Union churches took place in 1896 the
Conference ceased to exist.
INSTITUTIONS OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 169
The Scottish Congeegational Total Abstinence
Society was instituted in 1867, with the object of
promoting the practice of abstinence among the members
and ministers of Congregational churches. The work of
the society has been done by arranging for having sermons
on total abstinence preached by ministers at the annual
meetings of the Union, forming Bands of Hope in con-
nection with the churches, and in other ways seeking to
advance the cause of abstinence from strong drinks.
In 1879 a Standing Committee of the Evangelical
Union was appointed " to promote the interests of the
Temperance Eeform."
The Pastors' Supplementary Stipend Fund was started
in 1872, with the view of supplementing the salaries of
pastors, so that their income from all sources might be at
least £140 to £150 per annum. The Fund was originated
by a number of laymen, chiefly in Glasgow, who were
concerned to learn that " the stipends of a considerable
number of the pastors of churches in connection with the
Congregational Union of Scotland were not adequate to
their comfortable support." They therefore started this
Fund in order to supplement the efforts of churches and the
Union on behalf of the pastors. Liberal contributions
were given to the Fund during the first few years of its
existence, its income having reached the figure of £1538 in
1874, and the committee were enabled to give large grants
to pastors, which afforded welcome relief to them. For
some six or seven years the supplementary grants of the
Fund enabled the committee to raise salaries to £100 in
country districts, £120 in towns, and £140 in cities, with
£10 additional where there was no manse. An arrange-
ment was also made by which the annual income of the Fund
was divided into shares, the value of which was determined
by the number of applications and the amount available
for distribution. Pastors of churches contributing to
salary 10s. per member, but under 15s. received two shares;
15s. and under 20s. three shares; and 20s. or upwards four
shares. Owing to the death of many of the original
170 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
contributors in the course of years, the income of the
Fund decreased considerably, until, during some years prior
to the " union," it had fallen to a little over £400, which
was obtained chiefly from some individual contributors.
When the churches of the Congregational and Evangelical
Unions united in 1896 the Fund ceased to exist as a
separate institution, it being understood that its objects
would be served by the " Church-aid " branch of the Con-
gregational Union. As in the case of other institutions
of the churches, this Fund owed much of its success to the
efforts of a few brethren, who zealously worked on its behalf.
Evangelical Union Augmentation of Stipend Fund. —
For the long period of thirty years there existed no special
Fund in connection with the Evangelical Union for the
augmentation of ministers' stipends. Whether it was that
the enthusiasm, zeal, and liberality of the early adherents
of the Union rendered such a Fund unnecessary, or whether
the ministers themselves were so earnest and zealous in the
proclamation of the simple, world-wide Gospel as to render
them indifferent to their financial affairs, it would be difficult
at this time of day to decide. But the time arrived when
it was found necessary to introduce a systematic organization
to consider the circumstances and contribute to the wants of
the pastors of small and struggling congregations. And so
at the Annual Conference in October, 1873, a committee of
twelve laymen was appointed to attend to the business
of collecting funds and distributing them to such ministers
as were receiving less than £150 a year of salary.
A set of Eules was adopted for the guidance of the
committee.
The first committee appointed was composed of some of
the most influential laymen in the Union, and their efforts
to obtain funds was encouraging. Between £400 and £500
was contributed for the first year and was distributed in
sums varying from £10 to £30 to twenty-six pastors whose
salaries were less than £150.
The Eules provided that no grant would be given where
the salary was under £80, so as to induce the congregations
INSTITUTIONS OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 171
to contribute as much as possible to the support of their own
ministry ; and no grant was to be given unless the churches
themselves contributed to the Augmentation Fund. Both
of these rules were on the whole carefully adhered to.
Unfortunately at an early stage of the history of the
Fund, a dispute arose as to whether the committee should
reveal the names of those pastors who were recipients of the
Augmentation grants. The committee then in office were
strongly opposed to reveal the names, although the 8 th
Eule provided " That the Treasurer of the Fund shall pre-
sent to Conference a full and detailed statement of the
receipts and disbursements of the Fund for the previous
year, duly audited."
The Conference of 1875 decided that this Eule should be
complied with, and the greater number of the members of
committee resigned. The vacancies were however at once
filled up, although the dispute had rather an injurious effect
upon the progress of the Fund. The income never exceeded
£500 per annum, and the committee were never able to fully
carry out the original purpose of augmenting the salaries to
the minimum of £150 a year. But there can be no doubt
that during the whole history of the Fund, which continued
to exist till after the amalgamation of the two Unions in
1896 took place, very appreciable assistance was given to
underpaid pastors, and was very gratefully appreciated by the
recipients. For a good many years a few of the wealthier
members of the E.U. gave very handsome contributions to
the Fund, but in course of time these wealthy members
passed away, and in consequence the contributions suffered
to some extent ; and in later years the receipts averaged a
little over £300 per annum. But by that time the scale of
salaries had improved to some extent, and the falling off in
the Fund was not so severely felt as it would otherwise have
been.
PEEIODICALS.
Among the various religious agencies in connection with
Independent churches in Scotland, none has probably been
172 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
more influential and useful than its periodical literature.
The magazines that have from time to time appeared have
done much to keep in remembrance the great truths and
principles professed by them, to foster a spirit of unity and
interest in their common cause, and to supply them with
interesting and valuable information regarding each other's
work and the progress of religion generally. In their pages
many matters of practical interest have been discussed, and
several of the schemes of the churches owe their origin in
large measure to such discussions.
The first periodical in connection with Congregational
churches in Scotland was the Missionary Magazine, the first
number of which appeared on 16th July, 1796. With the
single exception of the London Evangelical Magazine it was
the first religious periodical in the United Kingdom, and
probably in the world. Originated, in the first instance, to
supply information and to excite interest in connection with
foreign missions, it became, in the course of a few years, the
organ of the Congregational churches, and while it never
ceased to give a large place to the foreign missionary enter-
prise, it devoted an increasing portion of its space to the
operations of Congregational churches. Its first editor was
the Rev. Greville Ewing, who for four years continued to
edit it, but who, owing to the pressure of other duties that
fell to him about the year 1800, had to relinquish his
charge. For some years it was conducted by Mr. John
Aikman and others, and in 1814 its name was changed to
that of the Christian Herald. A further change took place
in 1835 when it became the Scottish Congregational Magazine.
From 1814 till 1880 the magazine had as its editors brethren
whose names are associated with the history of the churches
in a marked degree — John Aikman, Dr. George Payne,
Gilbert Wardlaw, David Davidson, G. D. Cullen, Henry
Wilkes, Edward Napier, Henry Wight, Dr. W. L. Alexander,
Dr. James Campbell, Robert Spence, Professor Robbie, Dr.
Stark, and Dr. Russell. In 1881 a further change was
made in the name, and it became The Scottish Congrcga-
tionalist. From that year till the present time its editors
INSTITUTIONS OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 173
have been Messrs. Eoss, Auchterlonie, W, D. Mackenzie,
David Caircl, A. E. Henderson, and Messrs, Alexander Brown
and T. Templeton, the present editors. In the month of
July, 1900, the magazine entered on its 107th year.
It was not long after the formation of the Evangelical
Union, that its leading ministers realised that if they were
to keep in touch with all their brethren, scattered as they
were throughout Scotland and elsewhere, and exercise an
influence on those who were not of their religious circle,
they must use the press to the utmost extent possible, and
have a newspaper and other periodicals. The idea of a
newspaper originated with the Eev. Dr. Kirk, Edinburgh,
who enlisted the co-operation of the late Sir Wilfrid
Lawson, Mr. David Eeid, Dunfermline, and Eev. Eobert
Simpson, Glasgow. They started the Christian News, the
first copy of which was issued on the 5th day of August,
1846, the editor being the Eev. Peter Mather, Congrega-
tional minister, Ardrossan. At first it sold at fourpence
halfpenny a copy, and had a comparatively large circulation,
on both sides the Border. It found its way into many
homes by reason of its advocacy of temperance, it being at
that time almost the only paper which advocated the cause
of abstinence and the prohibition of the liquor traffic.
After Mr. Mather resigned his position as editor, his place
was filled by Dr. Kirk as nominal editor, who had associated
with him Mr. Eobert Martin and Mr. Peter Bruce as acting-
editors. This arrangement continued until the paper passed
into the hands of Mr. T. D. Morison, who secured the
services of the Eev. Dr. Adamson, the present editor, Messrs.
Inglis Ker & Co. being now proprietors. He had been a
regular contributor to its pages from 1867, and contributed,
besides other articles, all the " Notes and Comments " and
the most of the reviews. He has been assisted by several
sub-editors, the first of whom was the late Eev. Eobert
Hood, whose racy articles were much appreciated by the
readers. The price of the paper was reduced to twopence
in 1876, and more recently to a penny. It is now the
oldest religious newspaper in Scotland, and was the first of
174 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
that now large family of newspapers that take the name of
"" Christian." Its existence speaks volumes for the spirit of
the denomination, and the self-sacrifice of its editors and
contributors who have devoted themselves to its support
during upwards of half a century, and, in most cases, with-
out any recompense but that of seeking to do good.
The Day Star {a monthly) was started in 1846 by the late
Kev. Dr. Kirk, who continued to be its editor until 1876,
when he had to give up the work owing to failing health.
Soon after this the periodical ceased to appear. In the
pages of the Day Star there were many articles bearing on
practical Christian life, and much interesting information
regarding the work of the Evangelical Union churches.
In 1848 Dr. Kirk also started the Deiv Drop, a monthly
magazine for young people, which he continued to edit until
his death. The late Mrs. Kirk continued his work, and
after her death the Dew Drop became the property of her
son, the Eev. John Kirk, who, along with Mrs. Kirk, con-
tinues to conduct this interesting and useful magazine.
The Evangelical Repository, " a Quarterly Magazine of
Theological Literature," commenced in 1854, and was
published for 34 years. Its originators were Messrs. Eobert
Moyes, James Cochran, James S. Lang, and William Adam-
son, who became security against loss. They consulted the
Eev. Dr. Morison, who at once fell in with their plans and
took the position of editor. Its price was one shilling, and
it consisted of eighty pages. Its object was to expound and
defend the doctrines of the Evangelical Union and the
evangelical verities generally. After being editor for fifteen
years Dr. Morison resigned his place, and appointed the Eev.
Dr. Fergus Ferguson as his successor, who conducted it till the
year 1886, when it was turned into a monthly at the price
of sixpence, under the editorship of Dr. Adamson. The
proprietor stopped the magazine in 1888. It had a large
staff of contributors, who latterly gave their articles without
monetary reward.
Forward, " a Monthly Magazine for the promotion of a
Liberal Evangelical Theology and the advancement of
INSTITUTIONS OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 175
Practical Christianity," was started in 1867 with the design
of extending the influence of the views of divine truth held
by the Evangelical Union, and those who sympathised with
them. Its editor was the Eev. Dr. Adamson, who carried it
on for seven years, and gave it up because of the pressure of
pastoral and other work after he removed to Edinburgh.
The contributors were sought for, to as large an extent as
possible, outside of the denomination, and some of those who
now stand high in the literary world had their first contribu-
tion published in the pages of Forward. Among these may
be mentioned Dr. William Eobertson Nicoll, the Eev. Dr.
George Matheson, and the Eev. Dr. Thomas Whitelaw.
Among the other contributors were Principal Fairbairn,
William Honyman Gillespie, author of " The Argument A
Priori" Eev. George Gilfillan, and others. The circulation
of the magazine was to a considerable extent among those
who were outside the denomination.
Besides these, there were the two monthlies, the Evangelical
Witness, which existed for two years, and the Evangelical
Union Magazine, which was issued as the organ of the body,
but continued for only two years. The latter could not be
made to pay, and was given up for that reason. All the
other periodicals were not the official organs of the Evan-
gelical Union, but the property of private persons who took
on them all the responsibilities connected with their manage-
ment. This was found to work more satisfactorily than if
they had been the organs of the denomination. The arrange-
ment saved both money and friction, and secured freedom on
the part of both editors and contributors.
For some years prior to the change of the name of The
Scottish Congregational Magazine to that of The Scottish
Congrcgationalist in 1881, The Advance was originated and
conducted by friends connecte(^ with churches of the
Congregational Union in the west of Scotland. It was the
first penny monthly periodical in connection with these
churches, and did good service in endeavouring to stir a
lively interest in the work of the churches, under the
editorship of the Eev. Thomas Brisbane. When the Scottish
176 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Congregationalist appeared as a penny monthly, the Advance
ceased to exist.
The Evangelical Union Magazine was started in 1896,
" for the maintenance of Evangelical Union principles," and
is the organ of the minority party of the Evangelical Union
who declined to enter into the union of the Congregational
and Evangelical Unions in that year. It is a penny
monthly, and its pages contain articles bearing on the
principles of the Evangelical Union and on temperance,
besides giving information regarding the churches it repre-
sents. The Eev. John Kirk is the editor.
CHAPTER XVI.
UNION OF CONGREGATIONAL AND
EVANGELICAL UNIONS.
The history of religion in Scotland shows that the smaller
the points of difference between one religious party and
another, the greater the alienation between them ; but only
for a time. In the course of a generation the leaders in
ecclesiastical divisions begin to regard with more friendly
feelings those from whom they separated, and a new genera-
tion arises who attach less importance to the differences
that separated those of former days. The records of denomi-
national bitterness in the early part of the century, on the
one hand, and of the re-union of formerly divided church
parties at a later time, on the other, amply prove this. The
history of the churches of the Congregational body and
those of the Evangelical Union, shows that this historical
precedent has been followed in their case as closely as in
the case of their denominational neighbours. For many
years the two parties were alienated, and had little inter-
course with each other. But in the course of time it
became evident that both churches and ministers were
disposed to regard each other with more friendly feelings
than in former years, and that they recognised the fact that
they belonged to one body of Independent churches, among
which there was far more of agreement than difference.
This change was owing partly to the dying out of the older
M 177
178 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
men who had been leaders in the divisive movements of
earlier years, and partly to the advent of younger ministers
of churches who did not attach the same importance to the
points in dispute that had separated their fathers, or who
had come to recognise the fact, that in regard to the
preaching of a full and free Gospel, the churches of the two
sections of Independents were practically at one. At the
same time a change had taken place in the attitude of
members of the churches in regard to doctrinal differences.
They had no longer the same interest in discussing the
points of difference between Calvinists and " Morisonians,"
as they were called. Other questions had come to the front
that diverted attention from the old grounds of difference.
Further, the testimony of the Evangelical Union regarding
not only a universal atonement, but also the universal work
of the Holy Spirit had come to be virtually accepted by the
Congregational churches, and indeed by many belonging to
Presbyterian churches, though in the case of the latter the
change was indicated chiefly in ignoring " limitarian " views
of the atonement and of the work of the Spirit, and in the
exhibition of the Gospel as a message of divine love to all
men.
Although the feeling in favour of a closer approach to
each other of the two sections of Independent churches had
often been expressed by many individual ministers and
members it was not until the year 1867 that any formal
indication of it was given. In that year there appeared a
correspondence in the Christian Neivs in which a Con-
gregational minister and " two E.U. ministers " took part,
and who strongly advocated union between the two bodies of
churches. The proposal was strenuously opposed by several
correspondents on the Evangelical Union side, and notably
by the editor of the paper, and it became evident that the
time was not ripe for any overt action. In 1877 there
appeared several articles in the Scottish Congregational
Magazine in favour of Union, and at the annual meeting
of the Congregational Union in that year the movement
took a practical form by the appointment of a delegate
UNION OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 179
(the late Eev. Dr. David Eussell) to the Evangelical Union
meetings. In 1878 the good feeling of the brethren of the
Evangelical Union was shown by their appointment of a
delegate (the late Eev. Dr. Fergus Ferguson) to represent
them at the meetings of the Congregational Union, and
from that time there continued to be a yearly exchange of
delegates from both bodies of churches until their ultimate
union. At the annual meetings of the Congregational
Union in 1885 further progress was made by the favourable
reception of a paper at the Conference of Scottish Con-
gregation alists on " Union between the Churches of the
Evangelical Union and the Congregational Union," and
the discussion which followed resulted in the adoption of
a resolution instructing the committee to consider by what
means fellowship and practical co-operation could be pro-
moted between the two sections of churches, and also to
make inquiries of the Evangelical Union on the whole
subject of union. At the same time the deacons of the
Congregational churches attending the meetings took action
on the same lines, and appointed a committee to confer
with the office-bearers of Evangelical Union churches, and
to endeavour to ascertain whether a feeling in favour of
union existed in that body, and if so to take what steps
might be deemed necessary to promote the same. A joint-
meeting of office-bearers of both denominations was held
in April, 1886, with the result that a resolution was
passed to the effect that it was desirable that a union
should take place, and a committee was appointed to con-
sider matters of detail in connection with the proposal.
The committee met in February 1887, and, as the result,
it was agreed to ask each of the churches of both Unions
to state (1) whether it was in favour of the proposed
union, (2) whether it approved of the proposed draft of
union submitted, and (3) whether it had any suggestions
to make on the whole subject. The draft basis was
briefly (1) that the name of the united body should be the
Congregational Evangelical Union ; (2) that there should
be no more limited doctrinal basis of union than the great
180 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
principles of the evangelical faith and the congregational
independence of the churches, and that special doctrines
as to the mode of Divine operations or the Divine methods
by which the blessings of the Gospel are conveyed to men,
ought to be left to individuals and churches, and have no
place as a doctrinal formula or theological creed in the
constitution of any association of Independent churches ;
(3) that the united denominations should continue their
efforts for the suppression of intemperance ; and (4) that
in regard to finance there should be one common purse,
but that the details of this question be left for future
consideration and adjustment. Sixty churches of the
Congregational Union sent replies to the queries. To the
first, 38 churches answered in the affirmative, 3 in the
negative, and 29 sent no reply. To the second, 30 churches
sent a favourable reply, 2 were unfavourable, and 28 sent
no reply. Of the Evangelical Union churches 43 sent
replies. To the first query 30 sent favourable replies, to
the second 2 sent replies in the negative, and 27 sent no
replies. From the response made by the churches, and
the remarks made by some of them, it was evident that
they were not prepared to deal with the question of union
in a decided way, owing, as was stated by some, to the
lack of sufficient information, and of time for careful
consideration.
A further step in the direction of fraternal co-operation
was taken at the annual meeting of the Congregational
Union in 1887 by the committee being instructed to consider
whether it was desirable to have a conference between the
committees of that Union and the Evangelical Union, for
the purpose of arriving at an understanding with regard to
the appointment of agencies and the distribution of funds, so
as to avoid unnecessary waste of resources, and to arrange
with the committee of the Evangelical Union for holding
such a conference.
In March 1887 there was a friendly conference between
the ministers of the Congregational and Evangelical Unions
in Glasgow on the subject of union, with the result that the
UNION OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 181
following questions were adopted for the consideration of
the Congregational and Evangelical Union committees :
" 1. Whether it be desirable and practicable to have a con-
ference of the committees of both bodies, with the view of
arriving at such an understanding in appointing agencies
and distributing funds as may avoid unnecessary waste of
resources. 2. Whether a united meeting representative of
the churches of both bodies can be held with the view of
promoting Christian fellowship between the churches, and
such unity of purpose and action in all that relates to their
common interest as may be helpful to them as churches, and
serve to promote the interests of the Eedeemer's kingdom.
3. Whether, in view of the desire expressed by ministers and
members of churches of the Congregational Union and
Evangelical Union for a closer union with the Congregational
Union of England and Wales than at present exists, an effort
should be made to ascertain to what extent this desire
prevails ; and if it is found to be general, whether and what
steps should be taken to give effect to it, if found practicable,
after conference with Congregationalists in England and
Wales." The proposals were discussed at the Conference
of the Evangelical Union in 1888. and remitted for further
consideration to the commission of that body, with the
result that a resolution was passed to the effect that "in
view of the difference of opinion which the discussion at
last Conference brought to light, and of the interests of
our churches, the commission unanimously recommend
that discussion of the subject of union with the Congre-
gational Unionists should not in the meantime be further
prosecuted."
During the next four years the subject of union did not
cease to engage the attention of many of the ministers and
members of both Unions, and was repeatedly discussed in
the pages of the Scottish Congregationalist and the Christian
Neivs. At length, at the annual meeting of the Congrega-
tional Union in 1892, a resolution was adopted to appoint a
special committee for the following purposes : "1. To inquire
thoroughly whether the proposed union is desirable and
182 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
practicable ; 2. to invite the Conference of the Evangelical
Union to appoint a similar committee to confer with the
committee of this Union on the matters aforesaid ; 3. if the
result of the said Conference be in favour of union, said
committee of this Union shall carefully, and, if possible, in
conference with said committee of the Evangelical Union,
study the steps which must be taken towards the consum-
mation of the proposed union ; and 4. that a report from
said committee shall be presented at next annual meeting
of the Congregational Union."
At next annual meeting of the Congregational Union the
special committee reported that the proposed union is de-
sirable ; that in order to discover its practicability eight
members had considered and reported on doctrinal, legal,
financial, institutional, ecclesiastical, and temperance questions
in their bearings on the subject of union ; and that the
committee had invited the Conference of the Evangelical
Union to appoint a similar committee to confer with them
on the whole subject of union, which that body had cordially
agreed to do. The committee further reported that a meet-
ing of the joint-committee of both Unions met on 27th
March, 1893, and after friendly discussion it was agreed to
appoint a sub-committee, consisting of members of both
committees, to draw up a short doctrinal statement for the
consideration of a future conference of the two committees,
and another sub-committee to investigate the institutions of
both bodies. It was also agreed to adopt the following
resolution : " This meeting of joint-committees of the Evan-
gelical Union and Congregational Union finds that the
proposed union is desirable, and expresses its confidence
that all practical difficulties can, with care and patience, be
overcome." The report was adopted unanimously, and the
special committee reappointed to study further the details
of a scheme of union, in conjunction with a similar com-
mittee of the Evangelical Union, and report. At this
meeting a statement was submitted by several ministers of
the Congregational Union in the west of Scotland to the
effect that, without in any way expressing disapproval of
UNION OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 183
union, they wished it to be recorded that, in the event of
the amalgamation interfering with the financial position of
their churches, they held themselves free to take such action
as the circumstances might warrant.
At the annual meeting of the Congregational Union in
1894 a further report of the joint-committee was presented
and adopted, and the committee reappointed, with special
instructions to co-operate with the members of the Evan-
gelical Union in joint-committee in preparing an Explanatory
Statement based on the report of the joint-committee of all
the facts bearing on the proposed union, and the form it
should take ; to send a copy of the same to each church of
the Congregational Union, with the request to transmit a
statement of its views on the whole question of the ad-
visableness of union ; to arrange in joint-committee for the
calling of a joint meeting of the pastors and delegates of the
Congregational Union and the Evangelical Union to consider
the reports of the churches ; to obtain the opinion of legal
counsel as to the relations of the Congregational churches
to the Ferguson Bequest Fund in the event of union ; and
to consult with the trustees of the Ferguson Bequest Fund
as to any possible effect union might have on the administra-
tion of their trust in relation to the Congregational churches
now on the list of beneficiaries. The Explanatory Statement
was prepared by the joint-committee, and 35,000 copies were
issued to the churches for distribution among the members.
Along with the Statement there was sent a request to each
church to return answers to the following queries : "1. Are
you in favour of the union of the churches of the Congre-
gational and Evangelical Unions ? 2, If so, do you approve
of the union of the churches on the basis of the recom-
mendations of the joint-committee now submitted to you ?
3. If you answer the foregoing queries affirmatively, do you
leave to the annual meetings of the two Unions the work of
adopting the constitution, and of taking all steps requisite
for the consummation of the union ? "
A joint meeting of the two Unions was held in
Glasgow in March, 1895, to which scrutineers, who had been
184
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
appointed to examine the replies of the churches, reported
as follows :
Congregational Union Churches.
67 churches have
voted
.
2
-
2 „
1 „
-
1 ,,
1
-
11
-
8
))
for delay.
3
remain neutral.
QUERIES.
12 3
Yes Yes Yes
Yes Yes —
Yes No No
Yes — Yes
Yes — —
Yes No —
No — —
96
Evangelical Union Churches.
60 churches have voted
^ » J> 5>
•^O »» »i <«
2
1
2
not formally connected have voted
not formally connected remains neutral.
have not voted.
1
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
QUERIES.
2
Yes
No
3
Yes
Yes Yes
90
The joint meeting adopted resolutions to the effect that it
found the replies of the churches to the queries addressed to
them indicated that the judgment and desire of the majority
of these churches were in favour of union ; that, inasmuch
as it was extremely desirable that the judgment of the
churches should be unanimous, the meeting appointed a
committee to address a letter to, or otherwise approach, each
of the churches voting either against the union or for delay
of proceedings, requesting them to reconsider their decision,
and expressing the hope that they would see their way to
fall in with the decision of the majority of the churches ;
that it be recommended to the next annual meetings of the
Congregational and Evangelical Unions respectively to take
all further steps required for the accomplishment of the
union ; and that special resolutions should be adopted by
both annual meetings to this effect.
UNION OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 185
The annual meeting of the Congregational Union was held
in Dundee in April, 1895, when the foregoing resolutions,
together with the replies of the churches, were submitted.
After considerable discussion a resolution was unanimously
adopted to the effect that, though the judgment and desire
of a large majority of the churches of both Unions had been
expressed in favour of union, yet, in view of the extreme
desirability of arriving at a more nearly unanimous vote, the
supporters of union had consented to the postponement of
any vote thereon until the next annual meeting of the Con-
gregational Union, on condition that the opponents of union
then present pledged themselves to accept individually, and
to use their utmost efforts to induce the churches they
represented to accept, whatever decision might then be
arrived at by the majority of the meeting ; and that the
minority having so pledged themselves, the meeting resolved
to delay the discussion of the report until April, 1896. At
the same time a committee was appointed to continue con-
sultation and conference with a similar committee of the
Evangelical Union, and to take such action as might appear
desirable in connection with the proposed union until next
meeting. Owing to this decision, the Evangelical Union
Conference also delayed further action.
At the next annual meeting of the Congregational Union,
held in Glasgow in April, 1896, the following resolution was
proposed : " That, in view of the judgment of the Congrega-
tional Union given in favour of the union of the two
denominations, and in view of the resolutions adopted at
last meeting of the Conference of the Evangelical Union,
expressing its willingness, in name of the churches thereof,
to unite with the churches of the Congregational Union
under the name and designation of ' The Congregational
Union of Scotland, comprising the Evangelical Union and
the Congregational Union as existing in 1895,' and on the
basis of a constitution indicated in the Explanatory State-
ment sent last year to the churches of both denominations,
provided a resolution of similar import be accepted by
the Congregational Union, this meeting, in name and by
186 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
authority of the churches of the Congregational Union
expressed in the answer to the third of the queries sub-
mitted to the churches, hereby agrees to unite with the
churches of the Evangelical Union, under the name and
designation, and on the basis of a constitution aforesaid."
It was agreed that the following rider to the resolution
should be made : " At the same time, in so agreeing to unite
with the churches of the Evangelical Union, this meeting,
desiring to emphasise what is contained in the Explanatory
Statement, declares that the union shall not be in any sense
an ecclesiastical court or corporation claiming to interfere
with the independence of the churches, and that under the
new constitution no theological test shall be imposed on any
member, minister, or professor, the Bible alone being re-
garded as the standard of faith and life." An amendment
was proposed in the following terms : " That the report of
the Congregational Union Committee on union with the
Evangelical Union be received, and the committee cordially
thanked for their labours and diligence in carrying out the
remit of the annual meeting of 1894; and that this meeting,
while prepared to welcome heartily and to co-operate in
any measures which will promote and increase fraternal
intercourse between the churches of the Unions, such (1) as
more frequent and more general pulpit exchanges by the
ministers of the Unions, (2) by a working mutual eligibility
to pulpit charges, (3) by the formation of a council appointed
with powers, and which would be equally represented by
and representative of both Unions for the purpose of pro-
moting Christian work, the preventing of overlapping, and
the planting of new churches, and (4) by means adapted to
produce closer fellowship generally, hereby resolves not to
proceed further in the meantime with the proposals for
union on the basis proposed by the joint-committee." A
vote having been taken, it was found that 144 voted for the
motion and 33 for the amendment ; 20 members did not
vote. On the result of the vote having been intimated,
fourteen pastors and delegates protested, declaring that the
carrying out of this resolution would involve a secession
UNION OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 187
from the Congregational Union, and that on such secession
taking place the remaining churches of the Union would
alone belong to and represent the Congregational Union of
Scotland, and have right to its whole assets and estate,
powers, and privileges. A resolution was then passed
declaring the motion carried to be the finding of the
meeting. It was agreed that a joint meeting of the two
Unions should be held in October following for the purpose
of declaring the union, and that the meeting of the Congre-
gational Union should be adjourned until the day appointed
for such joint meeting. It was also agreed that the
committees of the Congregational Union should hold office
only and until the union of the two Unions, and that there-
after the affairs of the united body should be conducted
in accordance with resolutions passed by the joint meeting
for that purpose. Thereafter the following resolution was
adopted : " That in agreeing to enter into union with the
Evangelical Union this meeting declares that, notwith-
standing such union, the churches of the Congregational
Unions of Scotland do not mean or intend that there shall
be any departure from the principles or objects for which
this Union has hitherto existed, and that for all essential
purposes it will continue to exist under the proposed desig-
nation as if no such union of the denominations had taken
place." A final resolution was adopted, to the effect that,
in the first instance, the following branches of the work be
taken up by the Union under the care of committees : a
General Committee to manage the general business of the
Union, a Church-aid Committee, a Home Mission Committee,
a Foreign Mission Committee, a Sunday School or Welfare
of Youth Committee, a Publications Committee, and a
Temperance Committee ; that provision be made for includ-
ing the following branches of work among the operations of
the Union at as early a date as may be found practicable :
the Theological Hall, Ministers' Widows' Fund, Ministers'
Provident Fund, and Chapel Building and Manse Fund ;
and that a committee be appointed to act conjointly with
the committee appointed by the Evangelical Union for the
188 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
purpose of entering into conmimication with the last-named
societies, with the view of arranging for their inclusion in
the Union at as early a date as possible, preparing a draft
constitution to be submitted to the joint meeting of the
two Unions, and to take such action as might be needful to
carry out the foregoing resolutions.
On 1st October, 1896, the adjourned meeting of the
Congregational Union was held in Glasgow, and the various
resolutions and draft constitutions, which were subsequently
submitted to the joint meeting of the two Unions on the
same day, were considered. The first resolution (see below)
was carried by a vote of 93 to 17. Fourteen pastors and
delegates thereupon protested in terms similar to those of
the protest made at the annual meeting in April. The
other resolutions were unanimously adopted. The draft
constitution was also considered, and several amendments
having been made, it was agreed to submit the draft as
amended to the joint meeting.
On the same date and at the same place a meeting of the
Evangelical Union was held, at which the following resolu-
tion was proposed : " That in view of the judgment of the
churches of the Evangelical Union and Congregational
Union in favour of the union of the two denominations, and
in view of the decision of last annual Conference, this Con-
ference, as representing the Evangelical Union churches,
hereby resolves to unite with the churches of the Congre-
gational Union under the name and designation of ' The
Congregational Union of Scotland, comprising the Evan-
gelical Union and the Congregational Union as existing at
1896.' " An amendment was proposed in the following
terms : " That, while recognising the duty of co-operation
with all Christians in common Christian work, and of culti-
vating the spirit of brotherliness and unity in relation to
other denominations, Conference is solemnly convinced that
in the meantime the Evangelical Union can best promote
the Master's work by keeping intact its distinctive de-
nominational position." The motion was carried by 140
votes to 14 for the amendment.
UNION OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 189
At the close of the meetings of the Congregational Union
and the Evangelical Union a joint meeting of both Unions
was held, to which the following resolution was submitted :
" That the churches of the Congregational and Evangelical
Unions having expressed their readiness to unite, and the
annual meetings of both Unions having passed resolutions
to the same effect, this meeting of pastors and delegates
declares the union of the churches of the two bodies, as from
1st January, 1897, under the name and designation of ' The
Congregational Union of Scotland, comprising the Evan-
gelical Union and the Congregational Union as existing at
1896.' " The resolution having been cordially and unani-
mously adopted, the doxology was sung and prayer offered.
A second resolution, in the following terms, was also
unanimously adopted : " That this meeting desires to express
its fervent gratitude to the great Head of the Church for
the spirit of brotherly love and unity in His service which,
it believes, has moved the churches to seek this union, and
which it gratefully recognises as the operation of His gracious
Spirit among them, and prays that the union may be for the
greater glory of God." The draft constitution, as amended
by the Conference of the Evangelical Union and the ad-
journed meeting of the Congregational Union and also by
the joint meeting of both, was then adopted. Other resolu-
tions were adopted giving directions as to the business and
other arrangements required to give effect to the decisions
of the joint meeting.
A comparison between the principles involved and the
methods adopted in connection with the union of sections of
Congregational churches on the one hand and Presbyterian
churches on the other would bring into prominence the
distinctive features of Congregational and Presbyterian
polity. It may be suSicient, however, to point out that
the ultimate decision in virtue of which the churches of the
Congregational and Evangelical Unions became united was
given by the members of the churches ; that church
functionaries, whether ministers or other office-bearers, had
their share in the negotiations and ultimate decision, not in
190 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
any official capacity, but as members of the churches ; and
that the various committees and the Union meetings of both
bodies had no determining voice in the proceedings, but
acted only in an executive capacity in carrying out the
instructions of the members of the churches and giving
effect to their decision.
On the first day of January, 1897, the union of the two
bodies came into operation, and all the office-bearers pre-
viously appointed assumed office.^
Dating from the exchange of fraternal greetings on the
part of both Unions by the appearance of the Eev. Dr.
Eussell as delegate from the Congregational Union to the
Evangelical Union in 1877, twenty years elapsed from the
first approach towards union until its consummation in
1897. The first attempt of a more practical kind in the
direction of union was made in 1885, when the office-bearers
of the churches arranged to obtain an expression of the mind
of the churches in regard to union; so that about twelve years
were spent in conference and negotiation with a view to union.
At an early stage of the proceedings in connection with
union the question of its practical bearing on the pecuniary
interests of certain churches was forced upon the attention
of the Congregational Union by the action of the pastors of
churches in the west of Scotland, who (at the annual meet-
ing in 1893) claimed freedom to take such action as the
circumstances might warrant, in the event of the union
taking place. This was the beginning of a movement which
resulted in troublesome litigation in the Court of Session,
which continued over some years. By the will of the late
Mr. John Ferguson of Cairnbrock, Ayrshire, who died in
1856, he directed his trustees to hold the residue of his
estate as a permanent fund, " and to apply the annual income
for the maintenance and promotion of religious ordinances
^ In the foregoing account the steps taken by the Congregational Union
are given in more detail than those of the Evangelical Union, in order to
avoid needless repetition. The ultimate results of the proceedings of both
Unions were the same, but in the case of the Congregational Union they
were more complicated and protracted tlian in the case of the Evangelical
Union, and are therefore narrated at greater length.
UNION OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 191
and education and missionary operations, in the first instance,
in the county of Ayr, stewartry of Kirkcudbright, and counties
of Wigton, Lanark, Eenfrew, and Dunbarton, and thereafter,
if the trustees think iit, in any other counties in Scotland,"
by means of payments for the erection or support of
churches and schools (other than parish churches and
parish schools) belonging to quoad sacra churches con-
nected with the Established Church of Scotland, the
Free and United Presbyterian churches, the Eeformed
Presbyterian Church, and the " Congregational or Indepen-
dent Church," in supplement of the stipends of the ministers
of these churches. Grants to Congregational ministers in the
counties mentioned had been given by the trustees of the
Fund from the beginning of its operations, in their belief
that the Congregational Union represented the body of
churches designated " The Congregational or Independent
Church " of Mr. Ferguson's will. When, however, the
union of that Union with the Evangelical Union began to
be considered the questions arose as to whether the new
body of united churches would come under the designation
of " The Congregational or Independent Church," and so be
entitled to claim grants from the Fund, and whether the
union might not endanger the interests of the churches
already aided by the Fund. These, along with other ques-
tions bearing on the legal position of the enlarged Union, were
submitted to counsel for their opinion, when the subject of
the name of the proposed Union was under consideration.
The answers given were such as encouraged the Congrega-
tional Union to proceed with the negotiations for union.
The protest and claim of the minority of the annual meet-
ing of the Congregational Union in 1896 to be the " Congrega-
tional Union of Scotland," while that designation was also
given to the united body which came into existence in
January, 1897, created a difficulty for the trustees of the
Ferguson Bequest Fund, and accordingly they presented a
petition to the Court of Session on 25th June, 1897, asking
" which congregations ought the petitioners to recognise as
eligible to participate in the benefits of the Ferguson Bequest
192 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Fund provided to the Congregational or Independent Church
in Scotland," and also asking the guidance of the Court.
Pending the decision of the Court they requested its
authority to continue the payments to each of the 22
Congregational churches in receipt of grants at the date of
the union of the two bodies. Answers were given on behalf
of " The Congregational Union of Scotland, comprising the
Evangelical Union and the Congregationl Union as existing
at 1896," to the effect that "the congregations or churches
composing the existing Congregational Union, including alike
those attached to the Congregational Union as existing prior
to 1897, and those originally attached to the Evangelical
Union, or at all events the former, together with the
dissenting or protesting Congregational churches, are now
' the Congregational or Independent Church ' in the sense of
the Ferguson Bequest, and are all alike eligible as recipients
of the benefits thereof." Answers were also given by the
minority party, to the effect that " the churches of the Con-
gregational order which have amalgamated with the Evan-
gelical Union have lost the distinctive quality of Independent
churches," inasmuch as " they had not only united themselves
with churches professing a creed which, besides, was at
variance with the religious belief of many Congregationalists,
but they had themselves adopted as a basis of union with
these churches a form of creed which was set forth in the
constitution of the new body," " that the constitution of the
new body differed essentially from that of the Congregational
Union as it existed prior to 1896," and that " the churches
which had amalgamated had lost all title to be considered as
' the Congregational or Independent Church ' in the sense of
Mr. Ferguson's settlement." The minority party did not
object to the continuance of grants from the fund until the
settlement of the questions raised, but they submitted that
none of the churches of the enlarged Union was entitled to
participate in the funds of the trust. The majority party,
on the other hand, stated in their answers that they did not
desire that any of the dissenting minority should be excluded
from the benefits of the trust.
UNION OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 193
On the 19th October, 1897, the case came before the
Court of Session (First Division), and after a short debate,
and the counsel for the Congregational Union having stated
that he did not know that the petition and answers con-
tained all the facts that the Court should have before it,
a proof of the averments of the parties was ordered to be
taken by Lord Adam, On 5th and 6th July, 1898, Lord
Adam heard proof The witnesses examined were, on
behalf of the Congregational Union, the Eev. James Eoss,
the Rev, George Gladstone, the Eev. Professor Simpson,
and Eev. W. H. Davison ; and on behalf of the minority
party. Dr. Glaister and the Eev. John Graham. The
evidence ranged over a variety of subjects, but, from the
amount of attention which it received, it was evident
that the " Prefatory Note " to the constitution of the
enlarged Union was felt to be the crucial point, so far as
the minority party were concerned. This note was recom-
mended by the joint-committee of the two bodies to be
prefixed to the constitution of the Union, as " explicative
of the purposes of the Union and of the chief grounds on
which the union of the churches has been sought," In the
note it is stated that "while the churches now entering into
union do not require formal subscription or assent to a
doctrinal creed from their ministers or members ; they
have been moved and encouraged to seek this union (1)
in the belief that they agree in holding as the ground and
condition of church-membership confession of personal
faith in Jesus Christ as Saviour and Lord ; (2) in the
desire to hold fellowship one with another in the worship
and service of God ; and (3) in order to effective co-opera-
tion in extending the kingdom of God and proclaiming
the Gospel of Jesus Christ, through whose person and
work as God incarnate, and the saving and sanctifying
grace of God the Holy Spirit, God the Father, in His
love, has made provision for and is seeking the salvation
of all men." The last clause of the note, as had been
frankly acknowledged in the course of the negotiations for
union, was inserted in order to meet the desire of the
N
194 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Evangelical Union churches for some record being made
of the special doctrinal testimony they had given con-
cerning the universality of the Divine love, especially in
regard to the work of the Holy Spirit. It was found
that the Congregational churches had no objections to
such a statement being made, seeing they were in virtual
agreement with the Evangelical Union churches on this
head, and this agreement had been confirmed by the vote
they gave in favour of union and of the constitution and
prefatory note recommended by the joint-committee of
both bodies. The chief contention of the witnesses for the
minority party was that the last clause of the note was a
" form of creed," while the witnesses for the Congregational
Union held that it was simply a statement of the general
belief of the churches of the Union, but that it was not a
creed in the sense that assent or subscription to it was or
could be required on the part of any minister or church
in order to connection with the Union.
In May, 1898, a "Joint Print of Documents" admitted
by both parties was drawn up and submitted to the Court.
This contained extracts from church title-deeds, and various
other documents bearing on the use made of statements of
doctrine by Congregational churches. In September, 1898,
the " proof " taken before Lord Adam was also printed,
along with an appendix containing various supplementary
documents similar to those given in the " Joint Print."
On the 9th and 10th November, 1898, the case was
debated before the First Division of the Court of Session —
the judges being the Lord President (Robertson), Lord
Kinnear, Lord Adam, and Lord Maclaren. The counsel
for the enlarged Union were Mr. Charles Guthrie, Q.C.,
and Mr. Craigie ; and for the minority party, Mr. Ure,
M.P., and Mr. Maclure. The case was taken ad avizandum,
and on 6th December, 1898, the following interlocutor was
pronounced by the Court :
" Eind, in answer to the question submitted by the
petition, that the congregations which the petitioners are
entitled to recognise as eligible to participate in the benefits
UNION OF CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHES 195
of the Ferguson Bequest provided to ' The Congregational
or Independent Church in Scotland ' are the congregations
which prior to 1896 belonged to the Congregational Union
of Scotland, irrespective of whether they have or have not
joined the new Union called the ' Congregational Union of
Scotland, comprising the Evangelical Union and the Con-
gregational Union as existing at 1896,' and also the
congregations which have been formed since the formation
of the last-mentioned Union, and belong to that Union ;
but that the congregations which before the formation of
the last-mentioned Union belonged to the Evangelical
Union are not so eligible, and decern ; appoint the ex-
penses of all parties in the proceedings . . . to be paid
out of the trust funds," etc.
CHAPTER XVII.
NOTES ON THE HISTORY.
1. Eepeated reference has been made to the principle and
practice of Congregational churches in Scotland with regard
to the membership of the Christian church. Inasmuch,
however, as their claim to hold a distinctive position on
this point has been often called in question, it may be
well to present the historic facts bearing on this important
matter.
Both in the "standards" and particular declarations given
from time to time by representatives of the several Eeformed
churches, regarding the character and qualifications of mem-
bers of a Christian church, there has been a general agree-
ment. By the nineteenth article of the Church of England
the " visible church " is declared to be " a congregation of
faithful men," and in the Westminster Confession of Faith
it is declared to consist of those " who profess the true
religion," while in the " form of Church Government " of the
Westminster Assembly the primitive churches are described
as made up of " visible saints, viz., of such as, being of age,
professed faith in Christ, and obedience to Christ." In later
times the declarations of Presbyterians were even more
explicit. The General Associate Synod declared that
" none but those who make a creditable profession of their
faith, and have a practice corresponding thereto," have a
right to the communion of the church ; ^ and the United
^ Narrative ji7id Testimony'^of the General Associate Synod, chap. xx.
196
NOTES ON THE HISTORY 197
Associate Synod declared that " those who are admitted
into the communion of a particular church should have
a competent measure of knowledge, should make a
credible profession of their faith, and are bound to a
conversation becoming the Gospel."^ By the Synod of the
United Presbyterian church, one of the questions author-
ised to be put to applicants for membership is, "Do you
believe in Jesus Christ as your Saviour, own Him as your
Lord, and engage, in dependence on the promised aids of His
Spirit, to observe His ordinances and obey His laws ? " ^
The qualifications for membership required by the Free
Church are three — "A confession of faith in accordance with
the word of God and the standards of the church, a life and
conversation becoming the Gospel, in so far as can be out-
wardly seen, and a competent knowledge of religious truth
and of the nature and meaning of Christian ordinances."^
In the Established Church of Scotland there has never been
any precise description of the character of those who are to
be received as members or communicants other than that set
forth in the Confession of Faith, viz., that they " profess the
true religion," and that they are not found " ignorant or
scandalous." * With the foregoing citations may be compared
the following from a manual which has been in use among
Congregational churches in Scotland for nearly a century,
and has been accepted by them as containing an accurate
statement of their views as to church-membership : " Those
only [have a right to the privileges of church-fellowship]
who are regenerated by the Spirit of God, through the saving
belief of the truth, and who actually enjoy fellowship with
God, with His Son Jesus Christ, and with one another,"
concerning whom it is required " that we judge of the
soundness of their profession by their words, and of its
sincerity by their conduct. If they speak and act as
1 Testimony of the United Associate Synod of the Secession Church,
p. 105.
"^Summary of Principles of the United Presbyterian Church, p. 16.
* The Practice of the Free Church of Scotland, p. 16.
* Larger Catechism, quest. 173.
198 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Christians we are bound to believe that they are Christians."^
It thus appears that the views of both Presbyterians and
Congregationalists regarding the qualifications of applicants
for church-membership are substantially the same, both
holding that a Christian church should be composed of
Christian persons, that is, of those who profess or confess
their faith in Christ as their Saviour, and whose conduct is
in harmony with their profession. And yet, from the days
of Principal Baillie^ (1644) until now Congregationalists
have been accused of taking it on them to decide as to
whether an applicant is actually and sincerely a true
believer in Christ. How unfounded is this charge may be
seen when the actual practice of Congregational churches in
admitting members is considered. When any one applies
for admission to a Congregational church he is carefully
instructed concerning the nature of the church as a company
of sincere believers on the Lord Jesus Christ, who desire to
have fellowship with one another and to unite in seeking to
extend His kingdom. The applicant is requested to state
whether he is a believer in Christ, and is prepared to follow
Him in life and conduct. If he replies in the affirmative,
and it is found that his life, so far as known, is consistent
with this confession, nothing more is required of him in
order to admission to the church. The simple statement of
his personal faith in Christ and evidence of his Christian
life are all that can be required concerning him. This
confession or profession of faith is not required in order that
the church may judge whether he is actually a converted or
regenerate man — of which God alone can be judge — but in
order that the applicant may clearly understand the nature
of the church as a society of professing believers, that he
may be warned against any possible misconception of what
^ Orme's Catechism of the Constitution and Ordinances of the Kingdom of
Christ, sec. iv. , 1817.
"^Letters, vol. ii., p. 85. Writing of the Independents of the Westminster
Assembly Baillie wrote: "They will admit none to be members of their
congregations of whose true grace and regeneration they have no good
evidence. By this means they would keep out of all the Christian church
forty for one of the best Reformed churches. "
NOTES ON THE HISTORY 199
church-membership means, and that the church itself may
be satisfied that he is one who, in the judgment of fallible
persons, and in all charity, ought to be accepted as a believer
in Christ. It thus becomes evident that this procedure is
resorted to both for the sake of the applicant and of the
church ; for his sake, that he may understand that the
responsibility as to the sincerity or otherwise of his con-
fession rests on himself and not on the church, and for the
sake of the church, that it may be understood that the only
responsibility belonging to it is that of using all proper
means so as to encourage only devout believers to join it.
But in no case have Congregationalists ever dared to pass
judgment on the spiritual standing of anyone before God.
The charge that has sometimes been made against
Independents that they have claimed for their churches
that they are composed of those who are better Christians
than those of other churches is both inconsiderate and
gratuitous. It is a charge that may be made with as
much force against all who profess to be Christians, who,
in seeking to follow their Lord, are seeking after a " better "
life than they find apart from Him. If Congregationalists
have sought a purer church-life than they have found
among other churches it certainly has been from no desire
to claim superiority to them in character or life, but solely
that they might the more faithfully seek to realise the
church-life approved by Christ. That they have in many
cases failed in this leaves unaffected the sincerity of their
aim and effort in that direction ; they claim at least that
their endeavour has been in accordance with the will of
Christ.
The misconception of the views of Congregationalists can
have arisen only from the known fact that they have made
it a special duty to exercise great care in the admission of
members, and so to deal with them that none might seek
to become members of the church save those who are, in
spirit and conduct, manifestly followers of Christ. There
can be little doubt that it was the care taken to be
faithful in this respect that gave rise to the charge which
200 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
was common enough in the earlier years of the century that
in dealing with applicants Independents virtually sought to
" judge the heart," and to pass judgment as to the real
spiritual state of men in the sight of God. They did no
more than any Presbyterian church would have done had
it been faithful to its own professed principle as to the
character of the membership of a Christian church. That
many Presbyterian ministers and office-bearers have been
and are as faithful in dealing with applicants as Con-
gregationalists is frankly and thankfully acknowledged ;
but the failure of the great majority of them, especially at
the time when Congregational churches were originated at
the close of last century, to seek that purity of communion
which is implied in their own professed principles and
their declarations, cannot be disputed. None have more
deplored the laxity in regard to admission to membership
that has from time to time prevailed among Presbyterian
churches than some of themselves ; and it was the
notoriously " promiscuous " communion that obtained in
many of their churches at the close of last century that
led Congregationalists to make it a chief principle among
them that only those who made a credible profession of
their faith in Christ ought to be admitted to the church.
But for the importance they attached to this principle they
never would have left the Presbyterian churches to which
they had formerly belonged. While some of them have been
needlessly and even unwarrantably inquisitorial in dealing
with applicants, and others have not been faithful to their
principle of purity of communion, the historic fact remains,
that throughout their history they have made it a
distinctive feature of their church-life to encourage only
those professing to be sincere followers of Christ to seek
connection with their churches. It is gratifying to record
that identity in principle in regard to the membership
of the Christian church on the part of both Presbyterians
and Congregationalists is rapidly being followed up by
identity in practice, and that there is increasing ground for
hoping that in the near future the faithful effort to seek
NOTES ON THE HISTORY 201
the purity of communion which both parties profess to
desire may become equally distinctive of both, however
much they may differ in regard to church polity.
2. Historically, Scottish Congregationalism may be de-
scribed as a dissent from Scottish Presbyterianism rather than
as a system of church-government adopted for its own sake.
The dissent has been taken on two grounds, one of which
has just been adverted to, viz., the prevalence of "promiscuous
communion " among Presbyterian churches, which, although
opposed to the avowed principles of Presbyterians, had
become notorious in the early part of the century. The
other was the denial by church-courts and church-officials
to those who afterwards became Independents of liberty to
carry out their evangelistic and missionary enterprises.
Had the early Independents found sympathetic support of
their views regarding the membership of the church as a
spiritual fellowship, and had church-courts not interfered
with their efforts by means of " lay-preachers " and others
to carry on the work of evangelisation, Congregationalism
would not have found a footing in this country at the time
it did. So far from adopting the Congregational system in
its entirety the early Independents shed only as much of
their former Presbyterianism as proved a hindrance to them
in their desire to realise their ideal of church-life. For a
considerable time after their origin many of the churches
retained Presbyterian usages, and many of them to this day
have some of the elements of Presbyterianism in their
practice — such as a " session," consisting of elders, whose
functions are substantially the same as those of the same
class of officials in Presbyterian churches, the only distinctive
feature of their Congregationalism being tjiat in all important
matters the sanction of the church is required to give effect
to their decisions. Even in regard to " church-courts " there
would have been no objection taken to them if they had
been only " consultative meetings rather than legislative and
executive assemblies " ^ (as was contended for by the men
^ Struthers' History of the Relief Church, p. 71. Referring to the action
of the Presbytery of Linlithgow, which had twice refused to induct a
202 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
who left the Established Church and formed the Belief
Church in 1752). What called forth the protest of those
who afterwards became Independents was the attempt, by
the exercise of mere ecclesiastical authority, to restrain the
liberty of ministers and churches to carry on their Christian
and evangelistic work in the way that best commended
itself to their judgment, and to deny to ministers the liberty
they claimed to preach the Grospel as they found it in the
word of God. It was this latter form of repression that led
to the secession from the United Secession church in 1843,
and the formation of the Evangelical Union. The leaders
of that movement had no special objection to church-courts
as such, but only to the abuse of their functions. When
Dr. Morison in proposing the formation of the Evangelical
Union said, " Let all ecclesiastical cases be thrown back into
the several churches, and chained there by the sound and
scriptural principle of Congregationalism," ^ it was not
because he was opposed to church-courts as ecclesiastical
institutions, but because he found that men were so liable
to abuse them, as he had found in his own experience,
that he and those who acted with him sought what they
considered the more excellent way of Congregationalism, in
which such abuse was not possible. Throughout the
whole history of Scottish Congregationalism it has been
adopted mainly for practical reasons, and not on the
ground of any theoretical preference for it as a system
of church-polity, and these reasons would not have existed
but for the unwise repressive action of Presbyterian church-
rulers.
minister who was not acceptable to the people by the command of the
General Assembly, and whose representatives defended their position on the
ground that "the decisions of no church court ought to be arbitrary, but
that every minister ought to be left to judge for himself how far, in con-
sistency with the word of God, he should yield obedience to ecclesiastical
superiors," Dr. Struthers wrote, " these were bold and literally Independent
lather than Presbyterian principles. They were such, however, as the
Church of Scotland had acted upon during her struggle with Episcopacy,
when she was independent of the State." Ibid., pp. 68, 69.
1 Life of Principal Morison, by Dr. Adamson, p. 237.
NOTES ON THE HISTORY 203
While all this is historically true, and as accounting for
the origin of Congregational churches, it has to be borne
in mind that while Congregationalism has originated as a
dissent from Presbyterianisra on the grounds already speci-
fied, it is also true that it has not been adhered to on these
grounds alone, but has come to be adopted by many in the
belief of its wise expediency and scriptural authority. As
the result of the teaching of the Eev. Greville Ewing, who
has been called the " father of modern Congregationalism in
Scotland," ^ great attention was given to the scriptural
grounds of the system, and in course of time it was no longer
adhered to merely because of objection to certain offensive
and repressive actings of Presbyterian churches, but because
it was believed to be most in accordance with the teaching
of the New Testament, and because it was believed that
the power and authority of chnrch-courts and church-
rulers over particular churches had no warrant in Scripture,
were opposed to their freedom, and unfavourable to the
exercise of their responsibility to the Divine Head of all the
churches. This view of Congregationalism was clearly and
emphatically set forth by the late Dr. Wardlaw in 1848 in his
work on " Congregational Independency the Church-polity
of the New Testament." While there are many Congrega-
tionalists who attach chief importance to the argument from
Scripture teaching and example in favour of Congregational
principles and practice, there are others who are unfavourable
to the attempt to deduce from Scripture any forms of church-
government corresponding to those now existing ; but there
is general agreement among Congregationalists in this — that
the two main principles for which they contend find a clear
warrant in the New Testament, viz., that of the church of
Christ being a society of believers in Christ, and of each
church being independent of all exernal control, and having
in itself the right to manage its own affairs under the
guidance of God.
3. Scottish Congregationalism has never been invariably
associated with adherence to certain theological doctrines.
^ Lives of (he Haldanes, p. 330.
204 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Many of the Independent churches of last century held and
taught " Sandemanian " doctrines with regard to faith, to the
influence of which some have traced much of the practical
antinomianism of their members and their alleged looseness
of conduct. The early churches of this century firmly
adhered to the doctrines of the Westminster Confession of
Faith, and for many years the system of doctrine set forth in
that work remained as the expression of the religious beliefs
of ministers and people. At a later time the Calvinism of
the Confession was virtually given up, and for many years
it has failed to find general acceptance among the churches.
The same freedom which Independents have claimed in
regard to church-government they have also claimed in
regard to their religious beliefs and their interpretation of
Scripture. While, as a matter of fact, there has been no
system of doctrine which has been uniformly and continu-
ously held and professed by Congregational churches, it is
equally true that no body of Christian churches has more
continuously and uniformly adhered to the teaching of
Scripture concerning faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, and a
life in accordance therewith, in order to the acceptance of
men by God. Their earnest adherence to that teaching has
been the ground of their equally earnest adherence to their
conception of the church as a company of faithful followers
of Christ.
4. The record given of the disputes and divisions among
Congregational churches is confessedly a sad one ; and yet it
has some relieving features. Those who were leaders in the
various movements that led ultimately to the alienation of
Christian men can be said only to have shown the narrow-
ness of mind and dimness of spiritual vision which were
characteristic of their time. There was not that recognition
of major and minor matters in connection with religious life
which has in the course of generations been gradually find-
ing acceptance, although even now it is imperfect, and
Christian people are still severed from each other on grounds
that cannot be approved by many who profess to take a
broad and liberal view of the proper relations of those who
NOTES ON THE HISTORY 205
seek to follow the teaching of Christ. Eeferring to the
disputes in the early part of the century, Mr. E. Haldane
thus expressed himself : " Are the things spoken of not a
part of His revelation ? Then let them not be called small
things or non-essentials. Let them be called nothing, and
then we ought decidedly to oppose them as forming no part
of "our duty. But if they are part of it, then it is surely
both irreverent and unwise to set them aside under any
name whatever. This is changing times and laws. It is
taking too much upon us."^ This was the state of mind of many
good men at the time. They pressed into prominence and
undue importance matters which had no essential connection
with Christian life, and made agreement on these a condition
of that communion which has its true and sufficient basis in
the faith in Christ which they all professed. Hence the
disputes and divisions as to mutual exhortation, plurality
of elders, and adult baptism, and on matters of even less
importance. Of these early disputants the best that can be
said is that they were men who sought to be true to their
deepest convictions, and who believed that they were faithful
to God in giving effect to them. Of the later divisions that
took place in connection with difference of opinion regarding
the work of the Holy Spirit, and which led to separation of
churches from the community to which they had formerly
belonged, the same can be said. Both parties were con-
scientious and sincere ; they erred in misunderstanding each
other, and in making a ground of separation a difference of
view that might have remained without affecting their rela-
tions to each other as those who professed the same faith in
Christ, and equally owned Him as their Lord. And yet
while many have deplored the divisions among Congrega-
tionalists, and which would have been avoided by less earnest
men, they have preferred the earnestness and freedom of
their church-life, with all its exposure to divisive influences,
to the apathetic and unearnest life of their former days, and
which they saw in the case of manj'- around them. Pastor
John Eobinson's defence of his brethren may be urged in
^ Lives of the Haldanes, p. 337.
206 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
equal defence of the good men of former days in Scotland —
" They only who enjoy liberty know how hard it is to use it
aright." Among all men who enjoy freedom, who are earnest
thinkers, and in whose lives conscience has the rule, differ-
ence of opinion and vagaries of belief are inevitable ; but if
these have had to be exhibited in forms which make an
apparent blot in our history, we would rather let the blot
remain than miss the earnest and faithful lives in which it
appeared.
5. The record of the extinction of many Congregational
churches requires to be considered in connection with some
facts in order to be fully understood. (1) There was a lack
of wise judgment in the original planting of many of
the churches in very small populations. Most of the
extinct churches were in places not having 2000 of a popula-
tion, many were in towns or villages having under 5000,
while only a very few were in large towns or cities. (2) The
pastors of most of the extinct churches (and many of them
never had more than one pastor) were originally evangelists,
whose success was found chiefly in the conversion of those
who afterwards formed the churches to which they minis-
tered, but who were not as successful in keeping churches
together as they had been in gathering them. (3) The
churches had from the first to carry on a struggle for bare
existence in the midst of much opposition and suspicion,
and their numerical increase in membership was hindered by
their supposed strictness of conditions of membership. (4)
Many churches had ceased to exist before the formation of
the Congregational Union in 1812, and many were saved
from extinction by the help given by that institution. In
view of these facts the wonder is that so many churches
have survived, and not that so many have become extinct.
6. It has already been noted that the men who became
leaders in the home-missionary movement that resulted in
the formation of the first churches of the Congregational
order that came into existence towards the close of last
century originally desired to give themselves to the work of
foreign missionaries, and that it was only when they found
NOTES ON THE HISTORY 207
this to be impracticable that they began to devote their
energies to the work of evangelisation at home. But amid
all their activities in connection with home-mission work they
never lost their intense interest in foreim missions. During
the existence of the Missionary Magazine — some eighteen
years — it continued to advocate missions to the heathen,
and to supply to its readers full accounts of what was
doing in the missionary field in various parts of the world.
As the Magazine was largely circulated in the homes of the
early Independents, the perusal of its pages created and
maintained a deep interest in all that pertained to foreign
missions. Every church became an auxiliary to the London
Missionary Society, and the monthly missionary prayer-
meeting, which was regularly held in nearly all the churches,
became one of the most interesting gatherings of the people.
So large a place was given to foreign missions that for many
years even greater interest was shown in them than in
mission work at home, and the pages of the Magazine were
chiefly devoted to letters from missionaries abroad and the
discussion of missionary schemes, while only a few paragraphs
were given to work at home. Although more attention was
given to home work after the Magazine was succeeded by the
Christian Herald, yet for many years the pages of the latter
had a large place given in it to accounts of work abroad.
The churches have continued this interest in foreign mis-
sions, and nearly every one of them remains a missionary
auxiliary in connection with the parent society. One
fruitful result of this missionary interest has been that a
large number of missionaries have gone from the Scottish
Congregational churches to the foreign missionary field.
Including those who have gone from the Theological Halls,
and those who have been trained elsewhere, it is estimated
that the contribution in men to the foreign field from the
Scottish churches has been upwards of seventy missionaries,
many of whom are still labouring abroad.
7. In estimating the progress and present position of
Congregationalism in Scotland regard must be had to the
churches of that order of which it has not been deemed
208 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
necessary to give an account in the preceding pages. The
Baptist churches number 113, with a membership of those
which have reported of over 15,000. In addition to these
there are many communities of the Plymouth Brethren, the
Society of Friends, the Independent Methodist Church, and
several others, all of which adhere to Congregational principles
and practice. If to these be added 193 churches noticed in
these pages, with their estimated membership of over 30,000,
it would probably be within the mark to estimate the total
number of Congregational churches in Scotland at the
present time at over 500, and the membership at over 60,000.
Nearly all of these churches have come into existence since
the closing years of last century.
While to some these figures may show gratifying progress
since that " day of small things " with which Congrega-
tionalism began in Scotland, to others it may appear
disappointing, when comparison is made with the numerical
progress of some other religious bodies. To the question
which is often asked. Why has it not been greater ? several
answers may be given. First of all, it has to be noted that
throughout its history Presbyterianism has held the ground
in Scotland, and has been the most popular system of
church-order. Apart from its strictly religious character
and spirit, it has in its history, its traditions, and usages
entered into the life of the Scottish people, and has in the
semi-political events of its history been associated with
much of their national life and many of their national
struggles for freedom, while Congregationalism has had to
suffer from the disadvantage of being regarded as an alien
system of church-order. Nor ought the fact to be over-
looked that the Scottish people have never laid great stress
on the Congregational view of church-life as a fellowship of
Christian people who aim at seeking to realise their indi-
vidual responsibility as members of the church, and with
whom reside the right and privilege of managing their own
affairs as answerable to the great Head of the church only.
They have, as a rule, been content to leave all church
matters in the hands of church-officers, and only when some
NOTES ON THE HISTORY 209
unwise and arrogant attempt has been made to deprive
them of their right to have the chief voice in choosing their
ministers have they been moved to assert their own rights
and liberties. What has been of chief importance to them
have been the " privileges " of the church in connection with
public worship and the ordinances of Baptism and the
Lord's Supper. Satisfied with these, they have been com-
paratively indifferent to the duty and privilege of choosing
and admitting their own members as well as their own
pastors, and have not fully acknowledged the duty of
members of churches to watch over and help each other,
which has been a prominent feature of the fellowship of
Congregational churches. Not much caring to exercise their
individual responsibility in matters concerning the interest
of the churches to which they belong, and having equally
little desire to assert their own liberties and rights in the
management of church affairs, they have regarded with
prejudice and aversion those disputes and divisions which
have from time to time arisen among Congregational
churches, and which have been possible only in the free
church-life which these churches greatly prize, in spite of
the risks of division to which their freedom exposes them
from its abuse. The liberal spirit which has been fostered
by Congregationalism has also had, to some extent, an
influence adverse to its progress. Taught as the members
of Congregational churches have been to cherish a catholic
spirit to all Christian people of whatever name, and to
regard with aversion a narrow denominational spirit, they
have in many instances lacked that esprit de corps which is
fostered, not only by a special preference for one's own
party, but also by a spirit of protest against and opposi-
tion to other parties ; and hence many of their members
have found it easy to leave their old connections and to
join others, so long as they have found the religious
teaching they preferred. There can be little doubt that the
numerical progress of Congregational churches has been
greatly retarded by this cause. If they had been able to
retain in their membership those who have left them owing
o
210 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
to the lack of faithful adherence to their own principles and
churches, their number would have been much greater than
it is to-day. Nor ought the fact to be overlooked that the
Congregational churches have suffered largely from the
exodus of many of their ablest ministers to England, where
they have found greater attractions in regard to jfields of
usefulness and personal comfort than in the smaller and
poorer churches to which they ministered in Scotland.
Other minor causes adverse to progress might be indicated,
such as the social disadvantages to which the members of
Congregational churches have been exposed, arising from
their numerical inferiority to other denominations, and their
advocacy of temperance and other reforms which have
alienated from them many who but for their lack of sym-
pathy with such movements might have sought or retained
a place among them.
These are but secondary causes. The chief cause of
comparatively small progress has been the lack of faithful
and earnest Christian life and activity on the part of
Congregationalists themselves. Professing as they do that
their principles and aims lie at the foundations of genuine
and faithful Christian life, they must confess that any lack
of progress in their advancement of these must be traced to
the defective life and spirit of those who acknowledge them
to be Divine — a confession, indeed, which must be made by
all Christians who find cause for deploring the comparatively
small progress of Christianity itself in the world.
8. What has been the influence of Scottish Congrega-
tionalism on the religious life of the people of Scotland it is
impossible to estimate, and even if it were possible it
might be invidious to attempt it. Progress in human life
arises from so many concurrent causes that we have to
beware of any attempt to give undue prominence to any one
of them, and especially in connection with religion. Just
as such a mundane circumstance as the French Eevolution
had its place in the awakening of Eobert Haldane to a new
religious life, so there may be many and varied causes of
religious progress. But, at least, Congregationalists can point
NOTES ON THE HISTORY 211
to the fact that contemporary with the rise and progress of
their churches there has been a great advance in religious
thought and life in Scotland. If, for example, the all too
temporary efforts of Provost Jaffray of Aberdeen and his
friends to form a Congregational church there some two
hundred and fifty years ago had the effect of inducing
that fiery churchman, Andro Cant, to be more careful than
he had been in the admission of members to his church,^
it is surely not too much to say that a like effect has been
produced by the example of Congregational churches in
seeking a purer church-life than has usually obtained
among Presbyterian churches. It is significant, too, that
the Disruption of 1843, or rather the " Ten Years' Conflict "
which preceded it, followed closely upon the revival of
evangelical religion which had been originated through
the work of the early Congregational churches, and that
Presbyterians themselves have acknowledged that the
influence of these churches was one of the originating
causes of the Disruption. May not the abolition of " Fast
Days " and other cumbrous observances in connection with
the celebration of the Lord's Supper, and the more frequent
observance of that ordinance which now prevails among
Presbyterians, have to some extent been brought about by
the example of many Congregational churches, whose
practice for more than a hundred years has been approached
only in recent years by other churches ? Their assertion
of the right of the members of each church to choose its
own minister must have been an object-lesson to churches
to which that right was denied ; nor can the freedom and
right of the members to share in the management of church
affairs which have been upheld by Congregational churches
have been without some influence in moving the members
to seek, and church-courts to grant, the larger share now
taken in church matters by the members of the various
Presbyterian churches. An even more powerful influence
might fairly be claimed for Congregationalism in connection
with the more liberal views of Divine truth, and especially
* Waddington's Congregational History, 1567-1700, p. 505.
212 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
in the preaching of a full and free Gospel, which have
prevailed among Presbyterians of recent years. It is
surely not too much to claim that the teaching of such
men as Wardlaw and Morison has had its share in intro-
ducing into Presbyterian pulpits and Divinity halls a more
liberal theology than that which prevailed before their
time. There was a time when nearly every one of the
" innovations " now adopted by Presbyterians, and which
had been familiar enough to Congregationalists — notably the
practice of " lay preaching " — were under the ban of church-
courts and General Assemblies. Such a large following up
by Presbyterians of much that has been characteristic
of Independent churches in their teaching, thought, and
practice is surely more than a mere coincidence.
9. In any attempt to forecast the future of Congrega-
tionalism in Scotland a distinction must be made between
the principles of that system and the particular churches
called Congregational. Just as the principles of democratic
and republican government find a larger recognition in the
professedly monarchical government of Great Britain than
in any republic in the world, so it is possible for Congrega-
tionalism to find practical recognition among professedly
Presbyterian churches. It is conceivable that in process
of time the government of churches by " church-officers,"
as declared by the Westminster Confession of Faith, may
come to be merely nominal, and that the determining voice
in all church affairs may be asserted and claimed by the
members ; that a return may yet be made to the Congrega-
tionalism of the period immediately succeeding the Scottish
Eeformation, when the function of ministers was to guide
the people by counsel rather than by authority ; and that
the state of things may recur which obtained during the
struggle between Presbyterians and Episcopacy, and during
the period prior to the formation of the Eelief Church in
1752, when church-courts were regarded as consultative and
deliberative rather than executive and legislative. Eapid
progress has, indeed, been already made in this direction.
Every effort is now being made among Presbyterians to
NOTES ON THE HISTORY 213
" govern " congregations, not by the exercise of mere
authority, but in accordance with their own will, and the
cases are few in which church-courts proceed in open
defiance of the expressed will of the people. The complaint
made by members of the United Presbyterian and Free
Churches, now happily united, that the members of the
congregations were not directly consulted in the negotiations
for union, and that those were carried out by church-
officials alone, is not without significance, as showing the
trend of feeling and opinion in the direction of self-
government by the people ; and the defence of this
procedure which has been made, that the union has
been effected in accordance with the ascertained consent
of the members, or at least in the belief that they were
favourable, clearly indicates the desire of church- officials to
recognise the will of the people as determining the ultimate
decisions in the affairs of the churches. This assertion
and claim of popular rights and liberties, as well as
responsibilities, are a marked feature of our time in every
part of human life, whether in religious or political
matters. The chief claim of Congregationalism in this
connection is that it has anticipated the demand for
" government of the people, by the people, and for the
people," under accepted Divine guidance, which has been
its distinctive character through several centuries. Should
this principle find general recognition among Presbyterians
or others, Congregationalists will regard as of secondary
importance the fate of the particular churches now called
Congregational, and be thankful if the testimony they have
hitherto borne be upheld by Christian men, called by what-
ever name.
The assertion of the principle of church-life as a
spiritual communion of fellow-believers in the Lord Jesus
Christ, which Congregationalists have set in the forefront
of their testimony, is one that cannot now be said to be as
distinctive of them as it was in the early years of their
history in Scotland. What difference obtains in regard
to this point is in regard to the degree of prominence
214 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
given to it by Presbyterians and Congregationalists. The
avowed principles of both commit them to the ideal of
church-life as a communion of Christian people, and to
their confessed aim of seeking to realise this in their
respective churches ; but probably the difference between
them emerges in this, that Congregationalists deplore any
shortcoming in the attainment of their high aim as an
indication of unfaithfulness, while Presbyterians are dis-
posed to excuse it as part of the imperfection that belongs
to all human associations. But, in truth, the high aim of
seeking to realise the kingdom of God in the actual lives
of men is one confined to no section of Christian people,
but is inseparable from a life of faith in the Son of God
and loyalty to Him ; and any progress in the direction of
its attainment will mark the faithfulness and success, not
of any particular denominations of Christians, but of the
church of the living God.
CHAPTER XVIIL
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES.
This list has been prepared with the view of giving the
dates at which the churches came into existence, and some
of the circumstances connected with their origin. As there
have been several centres of origin, it has been thought
proper to place the churches in the list under the headings
of those districts in which the several groups of them had a
more or less independent origin.
It has been the aim of this work to give the history of
the Congregational Churches without reference to any
denominational or other connection ; but, as a matter of
fact, the great majority of them are connected with the
Congregational Union of Scotland, composed of the two
communities of churches which were united in 1896. In
order, however, to prevent any misconception regarding some
churches not connected with that Union, it has to be
explained that when the Congregational and Evangelical
Unions united a minority of the churches of the latter body
declined to enter into the Union, and claim to be the Evan-
gelical Union, and to adhere to the theological position of
that Union as at 1843, as also to hold by what they
allege to have been the unwritten law of that Union, that
all engaged in the traffic of intoxicating drinks be excluded
from membership and office in the churches. These
churches are eight in number, two of which (one in
Murieston Crescent, Dairy, Edinburgh, and one in Mussel-
215
216 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
burgh) were connected with the Evangelical Union prior to
1896, and six have been formed of members of churches in
the neighbourhood of the places in which they are situated
and others since that year, viz., in Newington and Picardy
Place, Edinburgh ; Bain Street, Glasgow ; James's Place,
Govan ; Kippen Street, Coatdyke ; and Liberal Club Hall,
Paisley. There was also a minority of churches of the
Congregational Union which did not enter into the Union
formed in 1896, but as they are understood not to exist as
a separate body no distinction has been made between them
and the other churches in this list. It has also to be noted
that the Old Scots Independent Church, Glasgow ; Clerk's
Lane Church, Kilmarnock ; and Gilfillan Memorial Church,
Dundee, are not connected with the Congregational Union.
Churches marked t are extinct.
NORTHERN COUNTIES.
Aberdeenshire. — Aberdeen. — The church in Belmont Street
(formerly George Street) is the oldest Congregational church in
the north of Scotland. The leader of the movement that led to
its formation was Mr. George Moir, merchant in Aberdeen, "who
had been in the habit of worshipping with the Methodists, not
because he approved of their doctrine and principles, but because
he thought them earnest in religion." He had been led to adopt
Congregational principles mainly by a study of Lord Chancellor
King's "Inquiry into the Constitution, Discipline, Unity, and
Worship of the Primitive Church" (1691), and having been con-
vinced that the primitive churches were Independent churches,
he set his heart upon seeing such a church in Aberdeen. He was
joined by several like-minded Christian men, who, with others,
formed themselves into an Independent church towards the close
of 1797. A place of worship was erected and opened in George
Street in September, 1798. The first pastor was the Kev. William
Stephens, who entered on his duties in May, 1800, but remained
only until 1803, when he removed to Edinburgh to become the
colleague of Mr J. A. Haldane, and one of the tutors of the
theological class originated and supported by Mr. R. Haldane.
Mr. Stephens was succeeded by Mr John Philip (afterwards Dr.
Philip) in 1804. Before his settlement there had been a party
spirit in the church, and as several of the members had objected
to the call to him, and the divisive spirit continued to jDrevail,
Mr. Philip intimated to the church that he could not continue to
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 217
be pastor until he knew who of the members approved of one
another and of his ministry, and in order to ascertain this it was
decided to dissolve the church, and then reconstitute it b}' the
admission of members accepting each other in fellowship and
Mr. Philip as pastor. The result was that some 30 members out
of 277 refused to return to fellowship. Several of these left the
church, and along with some others formed a new church in
Frederick Street^ in 1807. Dr. Philip left Aberdeen in 1819 to
become one of the agents of the London Missionary Society in
South Africa, where he laboured for thirty years. He was
succeeded by the Rev. Alexander Thomson, pastor of the church
at Lochee, near Dundee. There was a minority of the church
who preferred the Rev. James Spence, who had been labouring
in Printfield (now Woodside), and they, along with some members
from Frederick Street Church, left and formed the church in
Blackfriars Street (now Skene Street) in 1820, under the ministry
of Mr. Spence. The members remaining in Frederick Street
removed to Dee Street,\ and in 1871 they united with the church
in Blackfriars Street. Some years prior to this an "unattached "
congregation, of which for many years a Mr. Hugh Hart had been
minister, settled in the old building in Frederick Street,! and in
1865 the church and its minister, the Rev. John Hunter, became
connected with the Congregational Union ; but the church ceased
to meet in 1882. Albion Street Church was formed in 1856, as
the result of the labours of the late Rev. J. H. Wilson, who two
years later was succeeded by the Rev. Dr. Duncan. Owing to
the increase of members the majority of them left and formed
Trinity Church in 1878. JFoodside Church was formed in 1821
by members of the churches residing in Aberdeen. No fewer
than ten ministers have gone forth from this church, most of
whom are still in active service in various parts of the world. St.
Paul Street Church was formed in 1846, chiefly by members of
Blackfriars Street Church, who were dissatisfied with the attitude
of the church and pastor towards the " New Views " party, as it
was then called. John Street Church was formed in 1863 by
members from St. Paul Street Church. Bon Accord Church was
formed in 1897 by members from Trinity Church.
In HuNTLY the church was formed in 1800 by the members of
the Anti-burgher church adhering to their pastor, the Rev. George
Cowie, who had been deposed from the ministry of the Anti-
burgher church in the same year for having " attended the
ministrations of lay-preachers, or Episcopalians, or Independents."
The church, while faithful to the principle of purity of com-
munion, continued to adhere to the practices of Presbyterian
churches, and for a long time had its " session," which managed
the affairs of the church, and quarterly communion, with "fast-
day" observances, and "preparation" and "thanksgiving" days.
218 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
In 1800 the church in STUARTFiELDf (or "Crichie," as it was
originally called) was formed under the ministry of the Rev.
James Eobertson, who remained pastor for thirty years, and then
removed to America. The church in Mid Street, Fraserburgh,
was formed in 1803, as the result of the preaching of Mr. J.
Haldane in one of his early visits to the north, and in the same
year the Rev. Udny Anderson became pastor. In 1845 a second
church {Manse Street), was formed by the pastor (Rev. Archibald
Duff) and members of Mid Street Church. In 1804 the church
in Westhill (formerly Blackhills) was formed, under the pastor-
ate of the Kev. John Smith. In 1845 this church ceased to be
connected with the Congregational Union, and ultimately joined
the Evangelical Union, with which it remained in connection
until the union of the two Unions in 1896. In or about 1805
three other churches in Aberdeenshire were formed, viz., in
BuxBURN,t where Mr. Cow laboured; in St. Fergus,! where
Mr. Gibson laboured for a time ; and in PiTSLlGO,! where Mr.
Beattie was pastor. None of these churches appears to have
existed for more than a few years. In 1808 the church in
DuNCANSTON was formed by members of the church in Huntly.
It retained the Presbyterian usages of the mother church. Mr.
Donald Morrison was the first pastor. From this church the
churches in Rhynie (1843), CuLSALMOND t (1824), and Insch
(1864) were formed. In 1822 the church in Inverurie was
formed, as the result of the evangelistic labours of the Rev.
William Brown, who became its first pastor. The church in
Peterhead was formed in 1823, and in 1883 several of its
members formed the church in Port Errol. Churches in
Ellon t and Banchory! were formed in 1828 and 1831, of
which the Rev. Messrs. M'Robert and Lowe were the first
pastors. In 1861 the church in New Pitsligo was formed by
members from the neighbouring Congregational churches ; and in
1879 the church in New Deer was formed by members who had
seceded from the Established church of the parish.
Banff. — ^The town of BanffI was visited by Mr. J. A. Haldane
in 1797, and his preaching produced a deep impression on
the people in the place and neighbourhood. It was not until
1809 that a church was formed, and Mr. Joseph Gibb became
pastor, remaining until 1827, when he emigrated to America.
He was succeeded by Mr. John Murker in 1833, who remained
pastor until 1879, when he died, and in 1886 the church ceased
to meet. There was a church in Keith f early in the century,
of which Mr. Japp was pastor, but it appears to have had a short
existence. The church in Millseat was formed in 1829, as the
result of the labours of Mr. Joseph Morrison, who became pastor
in 1831. In Cullen f a church was formed in 1846 by members
of the church in Banff. Mr. C. A. Piper was the first pastor ;
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 219
the church ceased to meet after the retirement of the last pastor,
the Rev. John Taylor, in 1877. The church in PoRTSOY f was
formed in 1862 by members of the church in Banff. Mr. Robert
Bell became pastor in 1871, but after his retirement in 1872 the
church ceased to meet. The church in Macduff was formed in
1879 by members of the church in Banff, and Mr. G. C. Milne
became pastor in the same year.
Moray. — The church in Elgin was formed by Mr. William
Ballantine in 1804. In 1801 Mr. Ballantine had accepted a call
from a " Free Presbyterian congregation," composed of persons
attached to the ministry of a Mr. Bain, minister of a " Chapel of
Ease" in connection with the Established church, on whose
removal they desired to have an evangelical ministry, while
retaining Presbyterian usages and order. Mr. Ballantine, being
a pronounced Congregationalist, soon found himself at variance
with the leaders of the congregation, who desired to retain some
Presbyterian usages he did not approve of, and the result was he
resigned the pastorate, and along with several brethren formed a
Congregational church in 1804. He was among the first to advocate
open "exhortation" by the brethren and plurality of elders; in 1807
he adopted Baptist views and left the place for America. Elgin
was one of the places in which Mr. R. Haldane desired to have a
"Tabernacle," and he erected a large building to contain some
1500 persons. As in the case of the " Tabernacles " in Edinburgh,
Dundee, and Glasgow, Mr. Haldane intended to have theological
classes for young men in the north of Scotland, and Mr. Ballantine
had under his care several of these while in the town. The large
building had to be vacated by the church, however, when Mr.
Haldane adopted Baptist views, and the little church had to
procure another and humbler place of meeting. In 1808 Mr.
Niel M'Niel began to labour in the place, and in 1815 became
pastor of the church, to which he ministered until 1854, a year
loefore his death. The church in Forres was formed in 1804,
when Mr. John Martin became pastor, and remained until his
death in 1834. He was succeeded by Mr. Robert Weir, who
remained until 1843. In the following year Mr. Nisbet Galloway
became pastor, who was connected with the Evangelical Union,
with the principles of which the church and succeeding pastors
continued to have sympathy, though not formally connected with
the Union. A church was formed in Knockando f in 1804, and
enjoyed the ministry of Mr. John Munro until his death in 1853,
after which the church was supplied by students in the summer
months, but in a few years ceased to meet.
The church in Nairn was formed in 1806 Avhen Mr. James
Dewar became pastor. For several years prior to his settlement
in Nairn Mr. Dewar had laboured with much success as an
evangelist in the Highlands of Perth and Argyleshires, along with
220 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Messrs. Alexander Farquharson and Mr. John Campbell of Oban.
He laboured with much acceptance in Nairn for twenty-nine
years.
Inverness. — In 1804 there were several preaching stations
in the district of Strathspey, at several of which the brethren
met in fellowship, but without pastors. When the dispute on the
Baptist question took place in 1807 most of the members adopted
Baptist views, and formed the Baptist Church in Grantown. In
Fort- William there was also a company of brethren, to whom
Messrs. Campbell of Oban and M'Killican of Acharn occasionally
ministered, but no pastor appears to have been settled. In the
town of Inverness f a church was formed in 1825, after several
unsuccessful attempts in the same direction in the earlier part of
the century. In that year Mr. James Kennedy became pastor, and
remained until 1861, a year before his death. Another effort to
form a church was made in 1870, when Mr. William Milne
became pastor; but he died in 1872, and on the removal of his
successor, Mr. Wright, in 1875, the church ceased to exist.
Ross. — No part of Scotland was less accessible to the evangel-
istic labours of the evangelists in the early part of the century
than the counties of Ross and Sutherland, in both of which
Presbyterianism has held the field more exclusively than in any
other part of the kingdom. They do not appear to have been
visited by Mr. Haldane and his colleagues in evangelistic work ;
but every jeav from the beginning of the century till many years
thereafter they were visited by Congregational ministers, who
preached the gospel in various parts of the country. The earliest
date at which anything like a movement in favour of Congrega-
tional principles took place was in 1802, Avhen, through the
preaching of a Mr. Rae, a student of divinity, many persons in
the town and neighbourhood of Fortrose f received spiritual
blessing. As the result of his earnest labours Mr. Rae was
invited to become the pastor of a number of Christian persons in
that district, and was ordained by Messrs. Cowie of Huntly and
Ballantine of Elgin. A place of worship was in course of erection
when it was found the people were unable to finish the work.
Soon after Mr. Rae became a Baptist, and many of his followers
joined him in the adoption of his views. In 1806 Mr. Alexander
Dewar, brother of the pastor in Nairn, visited the village of
AVOCH, and laboured so successfully that in 1807 a church was
formed, and he became pastor in that or the following year. He
was the means of gathering a large and prosperous church in the
place, which has still a leading place in the district as a centre of
evangelical life and activity. In addition to his pastoral labours
Mr. Dewar was a most laborious and earnest evangelist, and for
many years preached the Gospel in many parts of Ross and
Sutherland. He died in 1849.
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 221
Caithness. — Wick and Thurso were among the first places
visited by Mr. J. A. Haldane and his colleagues in their memor-
able tour of 1797, and in no part of the kingdom were their
labours more successful. In Wick a church was formed in 1799,
and Mr. John Cleghorn became the first pastor. He remained
until 1813 when he removed to Edinburgh to become the col-
league of Mr. Aikman. In 1799 the church in Thurso was
formed, and in that year Mr. Wilham Ballantine became the first
pastor; but he remained only until 1801, when he removed to
Elgin.
Orkney and Shetland. — The town of Kirkwall was the scene
of the earliest labours of Mr. J. A. Haldane towards the close of
the century, and in 1805 a church was formed, as the result of
the revival movement that took place in connection with the
preaching of Mr. Haldane and other preachers who followed him.
In 1806 Mr. John Black became pastor, but remained only about
a year in the place. In 1810 the church in H ARRAY was formed,
through the labours of Messrs. Ramsay and Robertson of Kirk-
wall, and in 1835 Mr. John Masson became pastor. In 1835 a
church was formed in Rendall,! of which Mr. James Russell
became pastor in 1835, but it ceased to meet in 1882, on the
removal of the last pastor, Mr. Alexander Whyte. In Shapin-
shay a church was formed in 1851 by persons who had adopted
Evangelical Union principles, and Mr. T. G. Salmon became the
pastor in the same year.
In 1799 Messrs. J. A. Haldane and Innes visited Shetland, and
spent six Aveeks in an itinerating tour, preaching to large congre-
gations. Their good work was continued by Mr. James Tulloch,
who had attended the classes of the Theological Academy under
Mr. Ewini;- in Glasgow, and returned in 1803 to Shetland, where,
in the region around Lerwick, he preached the Gospel. While
engaged in this good work he was " impressed " and hurried
on board a warship, but was soon liberated by the influence of
friends who understood the toleration laws better than his
persecutors. Having no adequate means of support for his family
he was compelled to seek secular employment, but continued his
evangelistic labours. He took the pastoral charge of a church in
BiXTER,t which ultimately was united to the church in Walls, and
died in 1863. The church in Lerwick was formed in 1808, as
the result of the labours of Mr. George Reid and Mr. Isaac
Nichol, who had been sent in 1805 to Shetland as evangelists by
the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel at Home. Mr.
Reid had been a student in the theological class conducted by
Mr. WiUiam Ballantine in Elgin. He became pastor of the
church in Lerwick in 1808, where he remained until his death in
1845. The church in Walls was formed in 1812, as the result
of Mr. Reid's labours in the place, and in 1825 Mr. Alexander
222 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Kerr became pastor. Although pastor of this church Mr. Kerr
also acted as pastor of several other churches in the islands, which
had been originated through his labours. In 1817 the church in
FOULA was formed, through the labours of Mr. Reid, and in 1819
Mr. Laurence Christie became pastor. A church was formed in
Sand in 1835 through the labours of Mr. Alexander Kerr, and
Mr. John Tulloch became pastor in 1838. A year or two later he
removed to Sullom (then called Northmavine), where a church
had been formed through Mr. Kerr's labours, and which had been
left without a pastor by his death in 1836. The church in
Reawick, with which the church in Sand ultimately united,
appears to have existed early in the century, but it was not until
1842 that a pastor was settled, in which year Mr. James Stout
took the pastoral oversight of the church, and remained until his
death in 1862. In 1862 the church in Sandwick,! the members
of which had been connected with the Lerwick church, was
formed, and Mr. John Tulloch was settled as pastor in the same
year, and remained until his death in 1882, after which the
church ceased to meet. In 1865 Mr. Samuel Sinclair became
pastor of the church in Whiteness,! the members of which had
been connected with the church in Sullom, and died after a short
pastorate of two years.
There were several small churches in the Shetland Islands which
never had pastors — SANDNESSf (connected with the church in
Walls), Seafield,! Unst,! and a preaching station at Nesting,!
Avhere Mr. Pottinger laboured for many years.
NORTH-EASTERN COUNTIES.
Kincardinesliire. — The church in SauchieburnI had its origin
in the Berean church formed there in 1773 by Mr. Barclay,
founder of the party of the Bereans. On his removal to Edin-
burgh in 1777 he was succeeded by Mr. James M'Rae, who was
succeeded by Mr. Thomas M'Kinnon in 1811. For some years
prior to that time Mr. M'Kinnon had acted as pastor along with
Mr. M'Rae, and the church was conducted mainly on Congre-
gational principles. It formed one of three congregations — the
other two being the church in Barrack Street, Dundee, and the
church in Newburgh — which had a close connection with each
other, though not professedly belonging to the Independent body.
The church in Sauchieburn appears to have adopted Congre-
gational principles in a decided way in 1809. Mr. M'Kinnon
was the first and only pastor in that connection, and after his
death in 1854 the church continued to exist for only a few years,
but a meeting is held monthly in the building. The church in
BervieI was formed in 1803, when Mr. Adam Paterson became
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 223
pastor, and was followed by Mr. James Mackenzie in 1806,
who laboured in the place till his death in 1850. In 1842
a church was formed in Laurencekirk, as the result of the
evangelistic labours of Mr. David Moir, and was joined by
members of the church in Sauchieburn. Mr. Moir became pastor
in 1842.
ForfarsMre. — Dundee. — The church in Ward Chapel is the
oldest Independent church in Dundee. It appears to have
originated in the union of three churches which existed towards
the close of last century and early in the present century.
(1) In 1769 an Independent church was formed by members of
an Anti-burgher congregation of which Mr. Andrew Scott had
been pastor. The church met in a building in Barrack Street
under Mr. Scott's pastorate, which continued until his removal to
England in 1790. (2) In 1797 a second Independent church
was formed by members of a congregation of the Relief Church,
of which Mr. Neil Douglas had been pastor, and met in West
Port under the ministry of a Mr, Hartly from England. (3) In
1801 a church was formed which met in the "Tabernacle," which
had been erected by Mr. R. Haldane, and Mr. William Innes
became pastor, and acted as tutor of a theological class at the
same time. Within the next few years the church became very
unsettled owing to the disputes that had arisen in connection
with "exhortation," baptism, etc., and Mr. Innes left in 1808 for
Edinburgh. When Mr. R. Haldane resumed possession of the
Tabernacle building, those members of the church who adhered
to their former views on baptism and other points met together
as a church in Sailor's Hall, and in 1810 Mr. David Russell, who
had been ministering to the church in Frederick Street, Aberdeen,
became pastor.
In the same year the pastor of Barrack Street church died, and
many of its members joined the church in Sailor's Hall, and the
pastorate of the church in West Port having at the same time
become vacant, that church proposed a union between the two
churches, which took place towards the end of 1810. It thus
appears that the present church had its origin in the union of
members of the three churches which have been referred to. "It
was feared by some that the churches would never properly
amalgamate, but such fears were speedily proved to be groundless.
In a very short time it could not be known to which of the
churches any member of the united church had originally
belonged." This happy state of matters was no doubt owing in a
large degree to the able and earnest ministry of Mr. Russell, and
to his wise conduct of church affairs. In 1833 the united church
entered its new building in Ward Chapel, so called from the
name of a field in part of which it was erected. The foregoing
account of the origin of the church is based on several narratives
224 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
of its early history, which do not all agree in their statements,
but the account here given is believed to be correct.
Lindsay Street Church was formed in 1834 by the pastor (Mr.
Shoebotham) and members of the local Methodist church who
left that body. Princes Street Church was formed in 1839 by
members of Ward Chapel Church residing in the district.
Trinity Church was formed in 1848 by members of Ward Chapel
Church and others who had adopted the principles of the
Evangelical Union. Panmure Street Church was formed by
members of Ward Chapel Church in 1853. Castle Street Church
was formed in 1855 by members of Princes Street Church.
Morison Church was formed in 1864 by members of Trinity
Church. In 1864 a church was formed in Broughty Ferry by
members of the Congregational churches in Dundee, and the first
pastor was Mr. James Bailey, who was settled in that year.
Russell Church was formed in 1866 by members of Ward Chapel
Church and others in Hawkhill district, and Mr. John Masson
became the first pastor. Gilfillan Memorial Church. — In 1879 the
Rev. David Macrae was called to the pastorate of the United
Presbyterian church, of which the Rev. George Gilfillan had
been minister. For some time Mr. Macrae had been engaged in
an agitation with the view of securing a revision of the Con-
fession of Faith and Catechisms, the doctrinal standards of the
U.P. church, especially in regard to the question of everlasting
torment. The Synod not only refused to sanction any change in
the formula of subscription, but expelled Mr. Macrae for demand-
ing it, whereupon his congregation left the U.P. body along with
him, and organised an independent movement in Dundee with
Mr. Macrae at its head. " The Presbyterian form of church-
government was retained, with modifications, that gave the
constitution of the church more of the democratic character."
The affairs of the church ai"e under the management of a session
and managers, but in all matters concerning the church the
ultimate appeal is to the congregation.
The church in Baltic Street, Montrose, was formed by the
Rev. George Cowie in 1800. Mr. Cowie had for some years
been a licentiate of the Established church, but had become dis-
satisfied with the doctrine and discipline of that body. After
hearing Messrs. Aikman and Haldane preach in the course of
their northern tour in 1797, he resolved to join the Independents,
or " Missionaries," as they were then called. He connected himself
with a small number of members of an Old Scots Independent
church in Montrose, and when it was dissolved, about 1799, most
of the members formed themselves, under Mr. Cowie's guidance,
into a Congregational church. He continued to minister to them
and to others who joined them, and to preach in the neighbour-
hood of Montrose, until in August, 1801, he was ordained pastor
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 225
of the church. He continued pastor until 1805, when he left
for Edinburgh to become one of the tutors of the theological
class instituted by Mr. R Haldane. A second church, in John
Street, was formed in 1847, as the result of a movement in favour
of the doctrines of the Evana;elical Union. The church in
Arbroath {Queen Street) was formed in 1801 by persons in the
town who had adopted Congregational principles. The first
pastor Avas Mr. Thomas Smith, who was settled as pastor in
1801. In 1864 a second church {Keptie Street) was formed by
members from the church in Friockheim, and others. The church
in Forfar was formed in 1832 by members of the church in
Letham, and Mr. William Lowe, of Banchory, was settled as
pastor in 1836. In 1841 a church was formed in Brechin, of
which Mr. Hugh Smith became pastor, and remained till 1842,
At a later date Mr. John Masson laboured in Brechin, but the
church ceased to meet after his removal to Letham in 1848. In
1867 the present church was formed by friends who sympathised
with the principles of the Evangelical Union, the first pastor of
which was Mr. William Reid, who became pastor in that year.
The church in Coupar-Angus was originated by members of the
Relief church in that place in 1848, who sought connection with
the Evangelical Union body. As a Relief congregation the origin
of it goes back to 1789. The occasion of its ceasing to be con-
nected with that body arose from the discovery of the fact that
the minister of the Secession church in the place had been trying
to dissuade preachers from accepting a call to the Relief church,
being anxious that it should unite with the Secession church, and
thus become connected with the new body of the United Presby-
terian church which was formed in 1848. The members of the
Relief church were averse to this, and applied for preachers to
the Evangelical Union, with which body it became connected
in that year. The first pastor was Mr. J. Frame, who was settled
in 1850. Churches were formed in the year 1803 in Letham,
LocHEE, and Whitely. The first pastors in Letham and Lochee
were Mr. William Lindsay and Mr. Alexander Thomson, who in
1819 became pastor of George Street Church, Aberdeen. The
church in Whitely never had a pastor, although Mr. David
Davidson and Mr. Walter Balfour laboured as preachers for some
years ; it was a small village near Dundee, now called by another
name. A church was formed in Kirriemuir f in 1804, The
original members belonged to the Relief church, and on the place
being given up as a station by that body those of the congregation
who were in favour of Congregational principles connected them-
selves with the churches in Dundee. For a time the church was
supplied by students of Mr. Innes's class in Dundee, who preached
in the place, and in 1804 Mr. Dunbar, a student from Mr. Ewing's
class in Glasgow, became pastor of the small church which had
p
226 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
been formed. He was succeeded by Mr. Collins, who remained
until 1825, and was followed by Mr. E.. Machray, who left in
1829, after which the church, which had become reduced in
membership, ceased to exist. There was a church or station in
Balfour t in 1806 under the care of Mr. Campbell, and thereafter
of Mr. Thomas M'Kinnon, but it ceased to exist on the removal of
the latter in 1809 to Sauchieburn.
Fifeshire. — There was a church in Newburgh in 1778, the
pastor of which was Mr. Alexander Pirie, who had been con-
nected with the Relief church. This church, the church in Barrack
Street, Dundee, and the Berean church in Sauchieburn, were all
Independent churches, though each of them had its own peculi-
arities in doctrine and church order. It appears to have been
dissolved after Mr. Pirie's death, but another church was formed
in 1841, when Mr. Andrew Yuill became minister. In 1843 the
present church was formed in connection with the Evangelical
Union. In CuPARJ a church was formed in 1800, as the result of
the labours of Mr. Francis Dick and others, and JMr. Warden
became pastor in 1802. A small church in PiTLESSiE,t which was
formed in 1802, and of which Mr. Currie was minister, united with
the Cupar church a few years thereafter. The church in Kirk-
caldy {JFest End) was formed in 1800 by a few persons in the town
who had adopted Congregational principles. The first pastor was
Mr. Alexander M'Lae. In 1810 Mr. Robert Aikenhead became
pastor. After having been 25 years pastor he adopted Baptist
views, and was invited to a Baptist church in Perth ; but the
church unanimously requested him to remain among them as
pastor, agreeing that the question of baptism should be made a
matter of mutual forbearance, and during the time he continued
pastor " there was perfect peace and harmony in so far as the
ordinance of baptism was concerned, and it is believed that
neither party had any occasion to repent of the arrangement then
made." The church in Pafhhead was formed in 1867 by friends
of the Evangelical Union, and in that year Mr. Boon became
pastor. The church in Anstruther was formed about 1800, and
in 1802 Mr. Hastie became pastor. In 1844 the church became
connected with the Evangelical Union, in which connection it
remained until the union with the Congregational Union in 1896.
In Dunfermline a church was formed in 1801, of which Mr.
Peter Grant was the first and probably the only pastor. Owing
to the inability of the church to support a pastor, Mr. Grant left
in 1803, and most of the members became Baptists. In 1840 the
church in Canniore Street was formed by members who had left the
United Secession church, and the first pastor was the Rev. George
Thompson. In 1850 the Evangelical Union church (Bath Street)
was formed, the first pastor of which was Mr. R. G. Harper, who
was settled in 1853. In LevenI a church was formed in 1802, in
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 227
which year Mr. Elder was ordained pastor. The church ceased
to meet shortly after the resignation of the last pastor, Mr. James
Hamilton, in 1848. In 1802 the church in Newport (formerly
Forgan) was formed, and Mr. Thomas Taylor became the first
pastor in 1803. There was a church in Keltie Bridge f in
1804, but it appears to have met for only a few years. In Elie f
there appears to have been a church as early as 1802, when a Mr.
Finlayson conducted services ; but the first pastor of whom there
is any record was Mr. Gilbert, who began his pastorate in 1805.
Finding it necessary to have other means of support than that
which the church was able to give him he opened a school. As
at this time the ministers of the Established church believed they
had the sole charge of education in each parish, and the Presby-
tery of the place (St, Andrews) resenting the attempt of a Con-
gregational minister to conduct a school in the parish, summoned
him to appear before them to answer the charge of having opened
a school without their warrant. They required him to sign the
Confession of Faith in token of his submission to them, and Mr.
Gilbert having refused to do this, the Presbytery obtained an
interdict from the Sheriff forbidding him to continue the school.
Mr. Gilbert continued his school work notwithstanding the inter-
dict, a few friends having resolved to make an appeal to the
highest court ; but when matters had reached this point Mr.
Gilbert was laid aside by illness, and having adopted Baptist
views and resigned the pastorate no further proceedings were
taken in the case. The church continued to have a succession of
good pastors until about thirty years ago, when it ceased to meet.
In 1804 the church in St. Andrews was formed, in which year
Mr. Thomas Paton became pastor. A church was formed in
Falkland f in 1806, and in the following year Mr. James Gordon
became pastor. The church appears to have regularly met for
only a few years, but in 1838 it was re-formed under the pastorate
of Mr. Elrick. It ceased to meet shortly after 1847. The church
in St. Monans was formed in 1877, in which year Mr. Lockie
was settled as pastor. In former years this place had been a
station connected with the church in Elie, although no church
had been formed till 1877.
Clackmannanshire. — In 1810 a church was formed in the town
of Alloa,! of which Mr. William Howden became the pastor in
the same year, but it ceased to meet on the removal of the last
pastor, Mr. John Burke, in 1853. In 1850 an Evangelical
Union church was formed in Tillicoultry (Ann Street), of
which Mr. George Anderson became pastor in 1851. A second
church (High Street) was formed in 1877 by members of the
United Presbyterian church who had adopted Congregational
principles, of which Mr. E. D. Solomon became pastor in the
same year.
228 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Perthshire. — In 1798 the church in 3Iill Street, Perth, was
formed by members of the Established and Anti-burgher churches
in the town. Mr. James Garie, who had been a licentiate in
connection with the Established church, was ordained in 1798.
In 1851 a new church was formed in Ceinal Street, by members
of Mill Street Church, and Mr. John Pillans was the first pastor,
but in 1872 this church re-united with the church in Mill Street.
In 1856 a church in connection with the Evangelical Union was
formed, of which Dr. W. Adamson was the first pastor. In 1896
this church and the church in Mill Street united.
In Aberfeldy a church was formed in 1800, while Mr. Hugh
Ross was labouring as a catechist in and around the place.
Several students from the theological class in Edinburgh preached
in rotation. After this Mr. Dewar (afterwards Principal of
Marischal College, Aberdeen) laboured for a time and was called
to the pastorate, but declined. In 1806 Mr. James Kennedy of
Glenlyon became pastor, and remained until his removal to
Inverness in 1825. In Blairgowrie a church was formed in
1803, and Mr. Peter Grant became the first pastor in 1807. In
1869 a church was formed in Crieff by members of the United
Presbyterian church in the place, and Mr. Davidson Black became
first pastor in 1870.
There were several churches formed in lowland and highland
parts of Perthshire, all of which are now extinct. In DuNKELDf
a church was formed in 1800, as the result of the preaching of
Mr. Hugh Ross, catechist, and of Messrs Greville Ewing, Innes,
Garie, Rate, Wardlaw, and Mr. Robert Haldane. In 1801 Mr.
John Campbell was ordained as pastor, and four years later was
succeeded by Mr. Robert Kinniburgh. Owing to the Baptist
controversy which took place at this time the church was greatly
reduced in numbers. Several preachers laboured in the place,
but it was not until 1813 that a pastor was settled. Mr. John
Black laboured from that year until his death in 1857, after
which the church ceased to meet. In Doune f a church was
formed in 1843, of which Mr. George Wight became the first
pastor, but the church ceased to meet after 1858, on the
retirement of Mr. D. B. Mackenzie. A church was formed in
Callander! in 1808, where Mr. Peter M'Laren laboured until
1826, when he was succeeded by Mr. Archibald M'Ewen, who
remained for some years, after which the church ceased to meet.
Several of the members afterwards joined the church at Doune.
In the Highlands of Perthshire a remarkable religious move-
ment began in connection with the labours of Mr. John
Farquharson, catechist and preacher. He was a "man of slender
parts, but of great zeal, piety, and perseverance." In 1800 he
visited the district of Breadalbane, and began his labours as a
preacher in the village of Killin. Being deprived of the place of
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 229
meeting there in which many had assembled to hear him, he
removed to a village on the south side of Loch Tay. There he
was joined by several earnest j^oung men, viz., Mr. James
Dewar, afterwards pastor of the church in Nairn, Mr. John
Campbell, who became pastor at Oban, and Mr. John Ferguson.
The result of their labours was a great revival of religion which
extended over a wide district of country.
While many professed to be couverted, and manifested great
earnestness in their adherence to the Gospel, much opposition
was experienced by the preachers and converts. Mr. Farquharson
was imprisoned in Aberdeen, at the instance of a Highland laird,
who gave him in charge for preaching on his estate, but the
preacher was liberated soon after. A young and zealous preacher
was sent three times to Perth jail on the same kind of charge.
So strong was the opposition of the Established church ministers
and the landed proprietors to the preachers and their work, that
only three families in the wide Breadalbane district would receive
Mr. Farquharson into their houses. Notwithstanding all this
opposition, Mr. Farquharson's labours were signally successful,
and in 1802 a church of 70 members was formed on Congre-
gational principles in Acharan f or Tuar, a village near Loch
Tay, of which in that year Mr. Farquharson became pastoi*. The
church soon increased to 100 members, the membership being
drawn from the Loch Tay district, Glendochart, Glenlochy, Glen-
lyon, and Glenquaich. In 1804 Mr. M'Killican, a student from
Mr. Ewing's class in Glasgow, became pastor of the church, while
Mr. Farquharson continued his labours as a preacher in and
around Killin. The church was then divided into four branch
churches, the mother church being at Acharan, and the other
three being at Lawers, Killin, and Glenlyon. In ministering to
these churches and in the work of evangelisation in the district
Mr. M'Killican was assisted by Mr. Alexander Dewar, who after-
wards became pastor of the church in Avoch, Ross.-shire, Mr.
James Dewar, Mr. John Campbell, Mr. James Kennedy of Aber-
feldy, and Mr. Peter M'Laren of Callander. In 1807 Mr.
Farquharson left the country for Canada, where he continued his
missionary labours. In 181G Mr. M'Killican also left the district
for Canada, owing to the emigration to that country of many
members of the churches, whom he resolved to follow to the land
of their adoption rather than remain with the rapidly decreasing
population of the district in which he had laboured. For some
years prior to this time the once flourishing churches in Bread-
albane had not only suffered from the emigration of many of their
members but from the troubles that arose in connection with the
Baptist controversy. Many of the members became Baptists,
others joined the church in Callander, and others were scattered
amonsf various churches. The few who remained faithful to their
230 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
principles as Congregationalists were too poor to support a pastor
or pastors, and the aid they had received from the Haldanes and
others having ceased to be given after the rupture among the
churches caused by their new doctrines, and "there being no
Congregational Union then formed to which the churches could
look for help, what were the pastors to dol Had the Union
then existed there is reason to believe there would have been at
least two flourishing churches in Breadalbane. Only one preacher
was sent to Breadalbane after the formation of the Congregational
Union, but he soon joined the Established church" ; and this last
discouragement so afi'ected the brethren that remained that they
ceased to meet as churches.
MIDLAND COUNTIES.
Edinburgh. — The first Congregational church in Edinburgh
was formed in 1797, when Mr. J. A. Haldane became pastor.
Prior to the erection of the " Tabernacle " in Leith Walk, which
was the scene of Mr. Haldane's subsequent labours, the church
met in the Circus, but in 1803 the membership became so large
that it was found desirable to have a second place of worship.
This was erected in Argyle Square in North College Street
(now Angiisiinc Church) at the sole expense of its first pastor, Mr.
John Aikman, who had been Mr. Haldane's colleague in the
Circus church. Here Mr. Aikman laboured until his death in
1834, but for many years he had had as his colleague Mr. John
Cleghorn, formerly of Wick. The church in Albany Street was
formed by members of the " Tabernacle " church who adhered to
their former views of baptism when Mr. J. A. Haldane adopted
Baptist opinions. They met in a hall in Bernard Street, and Mr.
William Innes became their pastor. .In a short time, however^
Mr. Innes adopted Baptist views and became pastor of the
Baptist church in Eose Street. For a time the church was
supplied with preaching by various ministers, among others
by the late Dr. Eafiles of Liverpool. The next pastor was Dr.
George Payne of Exeter, during whose ministry the present
building was erected, in 1816. In 1832 a church was formed
under the pastorate of Mr Henry Wight, the members of which
had been gathered together through his ministry in the Nether-
bow and neighbourhood . The church met in succession in a
room in Society Close, Richmond Court Chapel, and Richmond
Place Church, and in 1876 removed to the present place of
worship, Ho'pe Park. Mr. Wight continued to labour as pastor,
with an interval of a few years, during which he had a
pastorate in Carlisle, until 1860, when he retired from active
service. In 1880 a number of the members connected with this
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 231
church left it and formed Richmond Church,t of which Mr. A. N.
Scott became pastor in 1884; but the church ceased to meet
after 1891. In 1845 the church in Bristo Place (formerly
Brighton Street) was formed as the result of the labours of the
late Dr. Kirk, and others who had adopted the principles of the
Evangelical Union. The church in Buccleuch Street was formed in
1859 by friends who had adopted the same principles, and Mr.
G. T. M. Inglis was the first pastor. In 1872 the church in
Dairy district was formed by members of Augustine Church and
others, and the first pastor was Dr. Stark. The church meeting in
Sydney Hall was formed in 1878 by members of a meeting held in
that hall for some time prior to that year, and the first pastor was
the late Mr. A. D. Robertson. Morningside Church was formed
in 1887 by members of the Edinburgh churches, and the first
pastor was Mr. W. D. Mackenzie. In 1890 the Kirk Memorial
Church was formed in Abbeyhill, and Mr. John Adam became
pastor in the following year. The churches meeting in Picarcly
Place and Newington were formed in 1897 and 1899 respectively
by members connected with Evangelical Union churches in the
city, and others. In 1891 the church in Murieston Crescent,
Dairy, was formed by members of Fountainbridge E.U. Church,
of which the Rev. John Kirk became pastor in 1875, and is
pastor of the E.U. church in Dairy. In Leith {Constitution
Street) a church was formed on Congregational principles in 1805,
and in 1817 Mr. William Henry of Stirling became pastor, A
second church (Duke Street) was formed in 1844 in connection
with the Evangelical Union, of which Mr. Ebenezer Kennedy
became pastor in the same year. In Dalkeith the first church
{High Street) was formed in 1804, of which Mr. Alexander Arthur
became pastor in the same year. A second church {Croft Street)
was formed in 1847 in connection with the Evangelical Union,
but it was not until 1858 that the first pastor, Mr. Alexander
French, was settled. The church in Musselburgh was formed
in 1806, in which year Mr. John Watson became pastor. A
second church was formed in connection with the Evangelical
Union in 1891, of which Mr. A. D. Anderson was first pastor.
In 1837 the church in Portobello was formed by members of
churches in Edinburgh, and in the same year Mr. James Cameron
became pastor.
Haddington. — In 1804 a church was formed in Haddington f
by members of the church in Argyle Square, Edinburgh. Mr.
James Hill was the first pastor, and Mr. William M'Lellan the last;
he left in 1867, after which the church ceased to meet. There
was a small church in Garvald f in which Mr. Dunn ministered
from 1804 to 1806.
Linlithgow. — The church in the town of Linlithgow was
formed in 1806, under the pastorate of Mr. A. W. Knowles,
232 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
who continued to labour until his death in 1849. This church
ceased to meet after 1884, but the present church was
formed in 1890, as the result of the labours of agents of the
Evangelical Union, and especially of Mr. John Ure, the first
pastor. The church acquired the original place of worship, in
which it now meets. In the village of Kirkliston f a church was
formed in 1803, of which Mr. Wilham Eitchie was pastor until
1813, when he removed to Haddington. Owing to trouble arising
from controversy on the Baptist question the church was
weakened, and soon after ceased to meet. A church was formed
in Blackburn! in 1824, when Mr. James Hamilton became
pastor, but it was dissolved in 1843. The church in Bathgate,
which joined the Evangelical Union in 1843, was originally an
Anti-Burgher church, and was formed in 1807, and in 1812 Mr,
Robert Morison became pastor. Having adopted the views of his
son, Dr. James Morison, he was prosecuted by his presb3'tery in
1842, and excluded from the United Secession Church. He and
his congregation thereupon joined the Evangelical Union. The
church in Avonbridge was formed in 1843 by members of the
Bathgate church, and the first pastor was Mr. Robert Anderson,
who was settled in 1851.
Stirling.— The church in Stirling was formed in 1804 by
persons in the town who had adopted Congregational principles,
and in 1 807 Mr. William Henry became the first pastor. In the
same year the church in Falkirk {Bank Street^) was formed, of
which Mr. Robert Caldwell became first pastor. This church
joined the United Presbyterian body in 1898. A second church
was formed in 1843, by members of the United Presbyterian
church who, with their pastor, Mr. A. C. Rutherford, had
adopted Evangelical Union principles. A few years later there
was a division among the members, some of whom joined the
Congregational church and the others after a time ceased to meet
as a church. In 1872 the Evangelical Union cause was revived,
and a new church formed {Trinity), and in 1874 Mr. George Bell
became pastor. The church in Kilsyth was formed in 1838
by several persons in the town who had adopted Congregational
principles, and in 1842 Mr. Charles Piper became pastor, but he
remained only for a short time. In 1848 a new church was
formed by members of the United Presbyterian church, but it
was not until 1858 that a pastoral settlement took place, the
church having been in the interval supplied by students. In
1858 Mr. John A. Anderson became pastor, but died in the
following year. There was a church in Grangemouth f early
in the century in (1806), foi-med as the result of the labours of the
students of Glasgow Theological Academy. In 1807 Mr. WiUiam
Watson became pastor, and remained until 1832, after which the
church ceased to meet.
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 233
WESTERN COUNTIES.
Lanarkshire. — Glasgow. — The oldest Independent Church in
Glasgow is the Old Scots Independent Church in Oswald Street,
which was formed between 1760 and 1768. An account of it
will be found at page 34. The church in Uillhead is the oldest
of the later Congregational churches in Glasgow. Its origin may
be traced to the scheme of Mr. R. Haldane to have in each of the
large towns in Scotland a "Tabernacle," intended to be a centre
for evangelistic work in a large population. The first of these
was in Edinburgh, of which Mr. J. A. Haldane had charge ; the
second was in Glasgow, the third in Dundee, and the fourth in Elgin.
As each of these buildings was intended, not for a particular church
exclusively, but for large gatherings of people expected to attend
the preaching of the Gospel, it was made larger than most of the
other buildings in which Congregational churches usually wor-
shipped, the one in the small town of Elgin having been seated
for 1500 people. The Glasgow "Tabernacle" was situated in
Ann Street, off Jamaica Street, and Mr. Greville Ewing became
pastor at the formation of the church in 1800. In 1809 the
church removed to a new place of worship in West Nile Street,
having been compelled to make this change owing to the pro-
prietor of the " Tabernacle," Mr. R. Haldane (who had adopted
Baptist views), having resumed possession of the building. A
second change of locality was made by the removal of the church
to Ewing Place, York Street, and a third by removal from
that to the present place of worship. In 1803 the church
which now meets in Elgin Place was formed, and first met in a
building in Albion Street, and Dr. Ralph Wardlaw was its first
pastor. It removed to a new building in West George Street, and
on the acquisition of this place by the North Biitish Railway a
further removal was made to the present place of worship. The
church in Eglinton Street was formed in 1825, and originally met
in Brown Street, whence it removed to Nicholson Street, and
ultimately to Eglinton Street. Its first pastor was Mr. Edward
Campbell, who began his labours among his Highland countrymen,
for whom he conducted services in the Gaelic language. A
fourth church was formed in Albion Street in 1834, and Mr.
Thomas PuUar was the first pastor. It removed to a new
building in North Hanover Street,'^ from which the majority of the
members removed in 1878 to Parkgrove Church,j in Paisley Road.
The minority of the members who remained in North Hanover
Street after a few years ceased to meet as a church, and the church
in Parkgrove also dissolved at a later date, owing to the financial
difficulties caused by the erection of a too expensive building. In
1843 the church in MtisUn Street (Hood Memorial) was formed
by friends in connection with the Evangelical Union, and Mr.
234 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Kobert Simpson was the first pastor. In the following year
(184i) the church in Montrose Street was formed, of which Dr.
Fergus Ferguson was the first pastor. The original place of meet-
ing was in Blackfriars Street, but on the acquisition of this place
by the railway company the church removed to its present place
of worship. In 1848 the church in Dundas Street was formed, of
which Dr. John Guthrie was the first pastor. It took its rise out
of a society formed " for the extension of the knowledge of Jesus
Christ by means of sermons, addresses, Sabbath school instruction,
distribution of tracts, and otherwise." In 1849 a church was
formed in Bath Sireetj by members of the church in West George
Street (now Elgiii Place) under the ministry of Mr. S. T. Porter,
but it ceased to meet after 1873. The church in Great Hamilton
Street originated in 1849 as the result of the labours of Mr.
David Johnstone, the first pastor. Nelson Street Church was
formed in the same year by members of Montrose Street Church
and others. The first pastor was Mr. S. Chisholm. Originally
the church met in a hall in Nelson Street, and at a later date
removed to a hall in Norfolk Street, and in 1874 to the present
place of worship. The church in Dalniarnock Road was formed
in 1858 by members of the Nelson Street Church, and Mr. Robert
Anderson was the first pastor. The first place of meeting was in
a building the site of which is now occupied by the Wellington
Palace Halls, but in 1869 the church removed to West Street
and from thence to Dalmarnock Eoad. Wardlaw Church (Bell-
grove Street) was formed in 1856 as the result of the labours of
Mr. Gilbert M'Calhim, who had laboured as missionary of Elgin
Place Church in connection with the Dovehill Mission, and who
became the first pastor. Trinity Church was formed in 1862 by
members of Elgin Place Church, and Dr. William Pulsford was
the first pastor. New City Road Church was formed in 1868 as
the result of mission work carried on and mainly sujDported by the
late Mr. J. H. Watt in Garscube Road, whence the church
removed to its present place of worship. Mr. John Douglas was
the first pastor. Bethany Church was formed in 1870 at the
instance of Mr. Gilbert M'Callum, and as the result of missionary
work in Bernard Street district supported by Mr. Watt, and Mr.
T. Mathieson was its first pastor. Bmmmmel Church (Over-
newton) originated in the labours of Mr. James M'Lean, who had
been missionary in connection with Elgin Place Church, and who
became first pastor in 1872. Farkhead Church was formed in
1873, chiefly as the result of mission work promoted and supported
by the late Mr. J. H. Watt, and the first pastor was Mr. David
Gardner. Govanhill Church was formed in 1876 by members of
Evangelical Union churches on the south side of the river, and
Mr. R. Wallace was its first pastor. Moncur Street Church was
formed in 1876, and in 1877 the present pastor began his labours.
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 235
In 1877 the church in Dennistoun was formed by members of
Montrose Street Church, and in 1878 the present pastor entered
on his work. In the same year the church in Waterloo Street
(Ebenezer) was formed, by a union of the E.U. churches in
Ebenezer Church in Waterloo Street, and the E.U. church in
West Campbell Street. The former church was originally con-
nected with the Free church, but on the expulsion of its minister,
Mr. William Scott, from that body for holding that belief in the
Gospel was prior to regeneration, and generally for his sympathy
with " Morisonian " views, the minister and his congregation met
in the Trades Hall until the erection of Ebenezer Church in 1848.
The church in West Campbell Street was in connection with the
Evangelical Union under the pastorate of Dr. John Guthrie. On
the union of the two churches in 1877 Mr. Scott retired and Dr.
Guthrie remained as honorary pastor, an office which he held
until his death in 1878. Mr. Robert Hislop was the first pastor of
the united church, and entered on his work in 1 878. The church in
Hidchesontown was formed in 1874, and Mr. T. R. Atkinson
became the first pastor. The church originally met in Crown
Street and then in Commercial Road, from which it removed
to the present building in Rutherglen Road. The church in
Springhurn was formed in 1890 by members of Montrose Street
Church, and Mr. Alexander Pert was the first pastor. In Partick
the church was formed in 1891 under the ministry of Mr. James
Grant. The church in Whiteinch was formed in 1897 under the
ministry of Mr. James Bell. The church in Bain Street, Calton,
was formed in 1897 by members of Evangelical Union churches.
The church in PoUokshields was formed in 1899, and Mr. A.
Hamilton became pastor in 1900. Ulder Park Street Church
GovAN, was formed in 1860, and Mr. Robert Simpson was the
first pastor. It originally met in Windsor Street. The church
in White Street originated in the evangelistic labours of Mr. Hugh
Riddell, and was formed in 1865. Mr. William Reid was the
first pastor, and was settled in 1869. The church in James's Place
was formed in 1897 by members of Evangelical Union churches.
Beyond the Glasgow district the oldest church in Lanarkshire is
that in Cambuslang, which was formed in 1803, when Mr. John
Paterson (afterwards Dr. Paterson, who laboured for many years
in Russia as agent of the British and Foreign Bible Society)
became pastor. The next church formed was in Larkhall,
in 1804, as the result of the labours of Messrs. Haldane, Ewing,
and others. Mr. Thomas Alexander was the first pastor, and
was settled in 1822, from which year until 1834 he laboured as
pastor of the united churches of Larkhall and Hamilton. In the
latter year he ceased to be pastor of the Hamilton church, and
the church in Larkhall ceased to meet in 1848. In 1875 a
second church was formed in connection with the Evangelical
236 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Union, of which Mr. George Wood became pastor. The church
in Hamilton {Auchingmmmont Street) was formed in 1806, as
the result of the labours of Messrs. Haldane, Ewing, and others,
and in 1807 Mr. John Wilson became pastor. A second church
{Park Road) was formed in 1854, of which Mr. J. B. Kobertson
became the first pastor. In Airdrie (BroomknoU Street) a church
was formed in 1836 by members of a meeting of Congregationalists
and Baptists in the place, and Mr. Alexander Cuthbert became
the first pastor. A second church (Graham Street) was formed in
1845, of which Mr. David Drummond was the first pastor. In
1837 a church Avas formed in New Lanark f as the result of the
preaching of students, and Mr. Peter Anderson was the first
pastor. The church ceased to meet after 1869, on the removal
of the second pastor, Dr. M'Hardy, to Kirkcaldy. In Lanark
a church was formed in 1847 in connection with the Evangelical
Union, of which Mr. John Inglis became pastor in 1849. In
1841 the church in Bellshill was formed by members of the
church in Hamilton and neighbourhood, and INIr. Fergus Ferguson,
sen., was the first pastor. In 1844 the church in Carluke was
formed, of which Mr. John Hamilton became pastor in 1846.
In 1844 the church in Catrine was formed in connection
with the Evangelical Union. In Shotts a church was formed
in connection with the Evangelical Union in 1844, of which
Dr. Bathgate became pastor in 1845. In 1860 a church in
Coatbridge (Albert Street) was formed in connection with the
Evangelical Union, of Avhich Mr. John Inglis was the first pastor.
A second church (Buehanan Street) was formed in connection with
the Congregational Union in 1877, of which Dr. David Beaton
became pastor. In 1861 the church in WisilAW was formed in
connection with the Evangelical Union, of which Mr. Robert
Gray was first pastor. In 1872 the church in Motherwell was
formed by friends in the place who had adopted Evangelical
Union principles, and Mr. David Greenhill became the first pastor.
In 1877 the church in Blantyre was formed by members of
neighbouring E.U. churches, and Mr. William Wyllie was the
first pastor. In the same year the church in Uddingston was
formed, which had its origin in a movement in favour of the
principles of the Evangelical Union and of Temperance, and of
which Dr. T. W. Bowman was first pastor. In 1893 the church
in Clydebank was formed as the result of mission work promoted
by the Home Mission of the Evangelical Union, and of which
Mr. R. Macqueen became first pastor. The church in Stone-
house was formed in 1894 by members of the Free church, and
Mr. Peter Smith became pastor in the same year.
Renfrew.— The oldest Independent church in this county is
that in Paisley which now meets in the School Wynd. It origi-
nated among those who in the latter years of last century were
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 237
called " Friends of the People," and of whom there were many
societies throughout the kingdom. They were men who were
stirred by the events connected with the French Revolution, and
who sought political reform. Among those of this class in
Paisley there were some who were equally convinced of the need
of reform in connection with religion, and especially of deliverance
from the dominant power of the ministers in the Established
church. The liberal views of two successive ministers of the
High Church in the town- — Mr. Witherspoon and Dr. Snodgrass —
" had awakened much attention to the principles of rational
freedom." The original members of the Independent church
were wont to ascribe the formation of the church to the teachings
of these two men. The first hymn-book of the church had the
date of 1796, and old members of the church stated that it had
been published the year after the church was formed, which
would make the date of origin 1795. For some time the friends,
who had been meeting together in a malt-barn, finding that a
Mr. Wylie, a Burgher minister in the neighbourhood, was a
teacher who sympathised with their views, called him to be their
pastor. It is not known in what year this settlement took place,
but it was probably in the last year of last century. Mr. Wylie
remained with them only for a short time, dming which a place of
worship was built to accommodate five hundred people. For
some years afterwards the church continued to have preaching
supplies, and it was not until 1808 that a pastor was settled, in
which year Mr. John Young was ordained. In 1850 another church
was formed as the result of the labours of Mr. J. H. Lochore,
and which met in a building in Canal Street; but this church
united with the School Wynd Church in 1871. The church in
New Street was formed in 1845 in connection with the Evangelical
Union, and Mr. Alexander Wilson became pastor in 1846. The
church meeting in the Liberal Club Hall was formed in 1897 by
members of Evangelical Union churches. The church in Inver-
KIP t (formerly Auld Kirk) was formed in 1802, as the result of
the labours of Mr. George Robertson (afterwards of Thurso) who
for some two years previously had been labouring in the place as
an agent of the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel at
Home. Mr. Robertson was ordained to the pastorate in 1807.
He was succeeded by Mr. Thomas Low, who continued pastor
until his death in 1851, after which the church ceased to meet.
A church was formed in LoCHWiNNOCH f in 1803, by members
of Glasgow and Paisley churches. Mr. Hugh Eraser was the
first pastor, and was ordained in 1 806 ; but the church appears to
have existed for only a few years. In Greenock the church now
meeting in George Square was formed in 1805 by members of the
church in Inverkip. The first pastor was Mr. John Hercus, who
was ordained in 1806. The church in Nelson Street was formed in
238 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
1845 in connection with the Evangelical Union, and Mr. A. C
Rutherford was the first minister. In 1871 the church in St.
Lawrence Street was formed by members of George Square Church,
and the first pastor was Mr. George Moir. The church in
Mearns Street was formed by members of Nelson Street Church in
1882, and Mr. T. W. Bowman became the first pastor. In Barr-
head the church was formed in 1844, as the result of labours of
ministers connected with the Evangelical Union. Mr. Gilbert
M'Callum was the first minister, and was ordained in 1845.
There was a church in GoUROCKf formed in 1879 by members of
the United Presbyterian church there, the first pastor of which was
Mr. J. M. Sloan, who was settled in 1880; but it ceased to meet
after the retirement of the last pastor, Mr. J. C. Nesbitt, in 1889.
Dunbarton. — In 1802 a church was formed in Kirkintilloch,!
of which Mr. George Greig became pastor in 1804, but remained
only for two years, after which the church ceased to meet. In
1838 a church was formed in Alexandria,! of which Mr. James
Mann was pastor; the church ceased to meet after 1875. In
1878 the present church in Dunbarton was formed in connection
with the Evangelical Union, of which Mr. James Paterson became
pastor in the same year.
Argyll and Bute. — The pioneers of home missionary enter-
prise in Argyllshire were Messrs. Neil Douglas of Dundee and
Mr, M'Naught, Dunbarton, ministers of the Anti-Burgher church,
who had been sent out by that body to itinerate in the Highlands
in 1797. Their preaching excited great interest, and was blessed
to many, but they met with persistent opposition from ministers
of the Established church and the landed proprietors. In
1800 Messrs. J. Haldane and John Campbell visited and
preached in the extensive district of Cant3^re, and thereafter the
Society for Propagating the Gospel at Home decided to send
Mr. Archibald M'Callum, a native of Cantyre, to itinerate in that
district. Mr. M'Callum had been a student in connection with
Mr. Ewing's class in Glasgow, and was a man of great piety, zeal,
and prudence. His labours as a preacher began in 1800, with
the result that in 1802 a church was formed on Congregational
principles consisting of 50 members, over whom Mr. M'Callum
was ordained pastor in 1802. In 1806 the number of members
had increased to 150. So greatly had the good work begun by
Mr. M'Callum prospered that in a few years there were four
churches, the members of which numbered 272, and in connection
with which there were 26 prayer meetings. But the opposition
to the good man and his work was great and persistent. The
ministers of the Established church threatened to send him out
of the country, and to deprive all who heard him of their church
" privileges." The proprietor of the estate on which many of the
members lived was so determined in his opposition that he put it
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 239
in the option of his tenants either to relinquish all connection
with Mr. M'Callum or leave their farms. They preferred leaving
their farms to forsaking their pastor, and in consequence many of
them removed to Campbeltown and neighbourhood, where a
church was formed in 1805, and others removed to Arran. Of
the churches formed, Port Ellen, f Islay, had the services of Mr. P.
M'Laren and Mr. J. M'Lean till 1843; Fort Charlotte, f Ma,j,
Mr. George Murray and Mr. M'Laurin from 1823; and Clachan,\
Mr. M'Gregor till 1848. Mr. M'Callum laboured as an evangelist
until 1830, when he removed to Greenock, and ultimately removed
to New Brunswick, where he laboured for some years among
his Highland countrymen. Mr. George Murray was pastor in
Skipness,! Can tyre, till his death in 1861. The church in
Campbeltown f was formed in 1805, chiefly by members of the
churches in Cantyre who had removed to that place after having
been dispossessed of their farms. Mr. Duncan M'Pherson was
the first pastor, and was ordained in 1805. The church in
Oban was formed in 1805, mainly as the result of the earnest
efforts of Mr. Dugald M'Ewan and Mr. John Reid. For six years
the church was supplied by preachers. Mr. John Campbell, who
had been an earnest evangelist in the Breadalbane district, was
ordained as pastor in 1811. For a long time the church and its
pastor were much opposed in their good work, "almost all the
Established church clergy and the gentry using every possible means
for rooting out of the country the families and individuals who
had embraced Congregational principles. All those who went to
hear Mr. Campbell were threatened to be deprived of church
privileges, and some of the members were deprived of their
farms," One of the landlords sent " summonses of removal to
all the tenants on his estate who gave countenance to the preachers,
and one of his men was sent purposely to take down the names of
his tenants who were found hearing one of the preachers on the
Lord's Day at the village of Muckearn." Mr. Campbell continued
to labour until his death in 1854. In APPiNf Mr. Charles Whyte,
missionary in connection with Miss Rose Downie's Trust, was
ordained pastor of a small church in 1847, and on his removal to
Oban in 1855 he was succeeded by his brother, Mr. Henry Whyte,
after whose death (1875) the church ceased to meet. Mr. Archibald
Farquharson was ordained pastor of the church in TiREE in 1835,
and was pastor until his death in 1878, since which the church has
been occasionally supplied by preachers. The church in DuNOON
was formed in 1899 by members of the United Presbyterian
church, and others, and Mr. J. B. Allan became pastor in 1900.
The church in Arran (Sannox) was formed in 1806, when Mr.
Alexander Mackay was ordained pastor. This church suff"ered
much by the emigration of many of its members in 1829 and
in 1831, when many of them removed to Canada and Prince
240 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Edward's Island. The pastor for some time had to support himself
by teaching, until aid was given by the Congregational Union.
In 1836 a small church was formed in RoTHESAY,t and Mr. Archi-
bald M'Ewan became pastor in 1837. The number of members
does not appear ever to have exceeded twenty. On the death
of Mr. M'Ewan in 1838 he was succeeded by Mr. Anthony M'Gill,
who remained till 1848, after which the church ceased to meet.
" The opposition made to the preachers in some country
districts, particularly in many parts of the Highlands, resulted
from different causes. The feudal system in the Highlands, where
power was law, reigned rampant, when in the Lowlands of Scotland
it remained in abeyance. That pernicious system was abolished by
the legislature when the rebellion was quelled in 1745. The feudal
spirit was, however, afterwards long cherished by the landlords in
the north. The small farmers and crofters were tenants at will.
When a landlord got a commission in the army, or when he
wished to secure a commission for his son, the poor people had no
choice but either to give up their unmarried sons to be soldiers,,
or to leave the estate of the proprietor. In this state of things
what the laird claimed had to be granted, and his threatenings
were greatly feared. These gentlemen thought they had the
same legal right within their estates as their forefathers had
during the time when the feudal system prevailed, until they
became better instructed. The parochial clergy, too, had much
power over their parishioners. They arrogated to themselves
divine right over all persons within the bounds of their respective
parishes. It mattered not what the morals of the people were ;
baptism and "tokens" at the communion time were denied to
everyone who refused their unreasonable demands. The people
stood in great awe of these tyrannical men. Matters were in this
deplorable state when the self-denying men were sent forth to
make known the way of reconciliation to their countrymen. The
clergy sounded loud the warning against them as intruders ; in
many places they more than insinuated that the preachers were
spies and sowers of sedition, and that they were lazy shoemakers,
tailors, and smiths, without education. In some places the
people were from the pulpit desired to deny the preachers all
hospitalitj^, a thing considered sacred in the Highlands. The
clergy also complained to the landed proprietors, and where
ready access could not be found to an earl or a duke factors were
often very willing to gratify their ministers. Threatening messages
kept some back from hearing the Gospel ; others through fear
gave up hearing it, and some were i-emoved from their farms or
crofts for continuing to hear it. The missionaries did not desert
their posts in times of their greatest trials, when they saw any
prospect of being useful, and in the course of time they had the
pleasure of finding opposition and persecution gradually giving
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 241
way, and both themselves and their people possessing the con-
fidence of thoge who had formerly opposed them " [Kinnihurgh! s
MSS.).
SOUTHERN COUNTIES.
Ayrshire. — The oldest Congregational church in this county
was formed in Ayr in 1804, as the result of the labours of a Mr.
Penman, but the first pastor was a Mr. Alexander M'Lean, who
was ordained in 1808. The church was never strong numerically,
and after a succession of pastors who had to labour under great
discouragements, it ceased to meet about 1878. In 1844 an
Evangelical Union church was formed, and met in Wallace
Street, but in 1897 the pastor and most of the members left the
connection and joined the United Presbyterian church. A
minority of the members formed Morison Church in 1897, and in
1898 Mr. A. M'Connachie became pastor. In KiOlARNOCK a
church was formed in 1824, as the result of the labours of Mr.
(afterwards Dr.) John Campbell, who was ordained in 1827, but
left for London in 1829. After a succession of pastors, owing to
discouraging circumstances the church ceased to meet about 1862.
In 1840 Mr. (afterwards Dr.) James Morison became pastor of
the United Secession church in Clerk's Lane, but when he was
expelled from that body owing to his teaching of the doctrine of
the universal atonement of Christ, all but a few of his congrega-
tion left the Secession church, and continued to meet as an
Independent church in the Clerk's Lane Church, Avhich was their
own property, under the pastorate of Dr. Morison. Dr. Morison
remained until 1851, when he removed to Glasgow. In 1860 a
new building was erected in JFinton Place, to which most of the
members of Clerk's Lane Church removed, under the ministry
of Dr. Bathgate, the rest of them continuing to meet in Clerk's
Lane under that of Mr. R. Hislop, who was ordained in 1864.
Clerk's Lane Church ceased to be connected with the Evangelical
Union in 1887, when Mr. James Forrest was pastor. The
church in Stewarton was formed in 1827, by a number of
members of the Established church who had been refused
admission to the Lord's Supper by the kirk-session of the parish
" under the pretext that the doctrine of the death of Christ for
the whole human race which was professed by them was contrary
to the standards of the Church." They were joined by several
others, and an Independent church was formed, of which Mr.
William Cunningham, Esq. of Lainshaw, became pastor in 1827,
and continued until his death about 1842. The church in
Ardrossan was formed in 1836 as the result of services held at
the instance of the Western Association of Congregational
Ministers, and the labours of Mr. Peter Mather, who became
Q
242 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
pastor in 1838. In 1840 there was a Congregational church in
Beith, of which Mr. James Robertson was pastor, but it was
dissolved after some years. In 1861 the Evangehcal Union
church was formed as the result of a revival movement in the
place and the labours of Mr. Robert Steel, then minister of the
church in Dairy; and in 1862 Mr. Stephen Todd became pastor.
The church in Cumnock was formed in 1838 by members of the
church in Kilmarnock, and Mr. James Sime became pastor in
1840. The church in Galston was formed in 1842 by friends in
the place who sympathised with the teaching of Dr. James
Morison. The first pastor was Mr. David Drummond, who was
ordained in 1843. In Catrine the church was formed in 1844
as the result of a movement in favour of Evangelical Union
principles. In the same year a church was formed in Kilwinning,
of which Mr. R. Hunter was first pastor. In Darvel a church
was formed in connection with the Evangelical Union in 1844, of
which the late Dr. William Landells (who afterwards became a
Baptist minister) was pastor, but the church ceased to meet after
a few years. In 1884 the present church was formed, of which
Mr. John Mackintosh became pastor. The church in Dalmel-
LINGTON was formed in 1844 on Evangelical Union principles,
and Mr. Robert Brown became pastor in 1872. In 1859 the
church in Saltcoats was formed by members of the Ardrossan
church, and Mr. M'Dowell became pastor in 1862. In 1864 the
church in Dreghorn was formed by friends of the Evangelical
Union, and in the same year Mr. Robert Paterson became pastor.
Dumfries. — The church in Annan is one of the oldest Congre-
gational churches in Scotland. It was formed in 1794, in which
year Mr. Andrew Carnson was ordained pastor. An interesting
account of his settlement was given in the Evangelical Magazine of
1794. Being on a visit to Annan, the person in whose house he
lodged found him in possession of a Bible, which led to conversa-
tion about religion, with the result that he was encouraged to hold
meetings in the open air, which were well attended. His preach-
ing proved to be a blessing to many, and after a time he accepted
the call of the people to be their pastor ; but he does not appear
to have remained for more than a few years. After his removal
there was a succession of ministers of whom no trace can be found.
The church got into difiiculties early in the century, and the chapel
had to be sold to pay its debts. It was not until 1838 that another
church was formed, but it soon dissolved owing to mismanagement
of a case of discipline. In 1842 preaching supply was provided by
the Congregational Union, and in 1843 a new church was formed,
but there was no pastor until 1847, when Mr. Ebenezer Young
became pastor. In 1807 a church in Sanquhar was formed, and
Mr. David Davidson, afterwards of Elie, became pastor, but
remained only a few years, and after his removal the church
ORIGIN OF CHURCHES 243
became divided on the Baptist question, and most of the members
left and formed a Baptist church ; the others were scattered among
the various churches in the place. The present church was formed
in 1864 by members of churches in the place who were opposed
to the Calvinism preached by the ministers, and Mr. George
Gladstone was the first pastor. The church in Irving Street,
Dumfries, was formed in 1805 or 1806, as the result of the
labours of Mr. J. A. Haldane, and Mr. William Watson became
pastor in 1806. The church in Waterloo Place was formed in
1870 by members of the church in Irving Street, and the present
pastor, Mr. James Strachan, was settled in that year. In Thoen-
HILL the church was formed in 1851, mainly as the result of the
efforts of Miss Melrose and the preaching of Mr. Gabriel Thomson.
Mr. James Pearson became first pastor in 1855.
Kirkcudbright. — A church was formed in Gatehouse-on-
FleetI in 1806, as the result of the labours of various Con-
gregational ministers, and Mr. Archibald Millar was settled as
pastor in 1807, and remained until his death in 1835, after which
the church met for only a few years. Early in the century there
was a church in Dalbeattie called " The United Christian Church,"
the pastor of which was Mr. John Osborne, who had been expelled
from the Reformed Presbyterian church for holding views similar
to those advocated by the founders of the Evangelical Union at
a later time. Mr. Osborne was succeeded by Mr. Roseman in
1830, but subsequent to his removal in 1836 the church gradually
fell away, and after its dissolution one of its members presented
the communion plate to the present church, " because it stood up
for the principles for which Mr. Roseman had contended thirty
years before." In 1863 friends of the Evangelical Union began
holding meetings in a hall, and obtained preaching supply
through the Evangelical Union Home Mission, and in 1866
Mr. John Inglis became pastor of the church.
Selkirk and Peebles. — The church in Melrose was formed in
1841 as the result of the labours of evangelists, and in that year
Mr. Ebenezer Young became pastor. In 1844 members of the
church in Melrose formed a church in Galashiels in connection
with the Evangelical Union, and in the same year Mr. J. B.
Robertson became pastor. The church in Innerleithen was
formed in 1848 as the result of the labours of various preachers,
and in that year Mr. William Dobson became pastor. In 1886
the church in Walkerburn was formed by members of the
church in Innerleithen, and in 1888 Mr. D. B. Morris became
pastor. In 1842 the church in Philiphauyh, Selkirk, was
formed by members of the church in Melrose, and Mr. John
Nichol became pastor in 1856. A second church {Chapel
Street) was formed in 1878 in connection with the Evangelical
Union.
244 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Eoxburgh. — The church in Denholmj was formed in 1826,
and for about ten years was supplied by various preachers. Mr.
Robert Wilson became pastor in 1835. The church ceased to
meet after the death of its last pastor, Mr. John M'Robert.
There was a church in Jedburgh f formed in 1840 by members of
the church in Denholm, of which Mr. E. Cornwall was the first
and only pastor. An Evangelical Union church also existed in
Kelso,! of which Mr. John Eutherford was the first pastor, and
Mr. T. G. Salmon the last. In Hawick a Congregational
church was formed in 1805, of which Mr. Charles Gray became
pastor in that year ; but it ceased to exist in 1877 or 1878. In
1848 the present church was formed by members of the old
Congregational church and others, and Mr. Archibald Duff
became the first pastor in the same year.
Berwickshire. — There was a church in the town of Berwick t
in 1806 under the pastorate of Mr. J. Dunn, who remained until
1809. From that year until 1848 no record of the church can be
found. In 1848 Mr. W. D. Knowles became pastor, and remained
until 1851, when he removed to Perth. In 1852 Mr. Patrick
Morrison became pastor, but after a short time the church ceased
to meet. In Eyemouth there was a church in 1806 under the
pastorate of Mr. Brotherstone, but it existed only for a short time.
In 1861 the present church was formed by friends sympathising
with the views of the Evangelical Union, and Mr. R. Finlay
became first pastor. There appears to have been a church in
Reston t in 1806, to which Mr. Boag ministered for a time. In
1878 a church was formed by members of the United Presbyterian
church in Coldingham,! of which Mr. George M'Farlane became
minister, and who remained until his death in 1882, after which
the church ceased to meet.
Wigtown. — The church in Garliestown was formed in 1803,
as the result of the labours of Mr. J. Haldane and Mr. John
Campbell, and Mr. Thomas Smith was ordained in the same
year, and remained until his death in 1829.
CHAPTER XIX.
PASTORATES.
Note. — The churches given within brackets are now extinct, but notes of
their pastorates are given as having historic interest. Other extinct churches
which had only one or two pastors, or whose existence was comparatively brief,
are not entered in this list ; but references to them are made in Chapter
XVIII. on "Origin of Churches."
Aberdeen. — Albion Street. — Jas.
H. Wilson, 1848-59 ; John Duncan,
D.D., 1859-79; George Moir, 1878-
85; William Johnstone, 1885-92;
R. M. Cairnie, 1893.
Belmont Street. — William
Stephens, 1800-03 ; John Philip,
D.D., 1804-19; Alex. Thompson,
1820-53 ; David Arthur (colleague
and successor), 1841-74 ; J. Barton
Bell, 1874-76 ; James Stark, D.D.,
1877.
Bon- Accord. — J. Inglis Martin,
1898-1900; James Ross, 1900-
St. Paul Street. — Fergus Fer-
guson, senr., 1846-78; A. M.
Fairbairn (colleague and succes-
sor), 1872-77 ; Alexander Brown,
1877.
John Street. — Alex. Stewart,
LL.D., 1864.
Skene Street (formerly Black-
friars Street). — James Spence, 1820-
35 ; John Kennedy, 1835-46 ; Geo.
Thomson, 1846-47 ; Ninian Wight,
1848-52; John Thomson, 1852-59;
Thomas Gilfillan, 1859-70; Joseph
Vickery, 1871-82; James Bell, 1882-
88; Samuel D. Thomas, 1889-92;
E. Branch Mahon, 1893-1900 ; Wm.
Kirk, 1900. There was a union of
this church with Dee Street (for-
merly Frederick Street) Church in
1871. Frederick Street Church
was formed in 1807 by members of
George Street Church, who seceded
from that church owing to a
division during the ministry of
Dr. Philip. The pastors were :
David Russell, D.D., 1807-09;
Supplies, 1809-15 ; Richard Pen-
man, sen., 1815-37 ; Richard Pen-
man, jun., 1837-40; David Wallace,
1840-71.
Trinity Church (Shiprow). —
John Duncan, D.D., 1879-1900; R.
Steel, 1900.
WooDSiDE. — Neil M'Kechnie,
1822-38 ; James Byres Laing, 1840-
58; James Strachan, 1862-69 ; Wm.
Robertson, 1869-70 ; James Rae,
1870-79; George Saunders, 1879-
92 ; G. C. Milne, 1893.
Aberfeldy. — James Kennedy, 1806-
25 ; Malcolm M' Lean, 1826-35; John
M'Laren, 1836-70 ; J. Barton Bell,
1870-74 ; W. N. Challice, 1875-81 ;
W. Muncaster, 1882-84; William
Stevenson, 1884-92 ; D. J. Graham,
1893.
Airdrie. — Broomknoll Street. —
Alex. Cuthbert, 1837-39 ; Jamea
Taylor, 1840-1843; James Sime,
1843-46; John Menzies, 1846-52;
Supplies, 1852-55 ; James Innes,
1856-60; William Goldie, 1862-63;
T. R. Atkinson, 1864-74 ; James
Buchan, 1874-85 ; Joseph Jones,
1885-86 ; James Bayne, 1887-95 ;
Alexander Mann, 1896.
245
246
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Airdrie. — Graham Street. — David
Drummond, 1845-47 ; A. M. Wilson,
1847-65 ; — Scott, 18 - ; James
Monie, 18 - ; — Wood, 18 - ;
— Kyd, 18 - ; W. F. Riddell,
1897-99; James Monie, 1899.
[Alexandria. — James Mann, 1840- ;
T. Reekie, 1846- ; John Douglas,
1859-67 ; William Mackay, 1868-72;
W. Dargie, 1872-75; E. M. Ten-
nant, 1875-79.]
[Alloa.— William Howden, 1810— ;
Alexander Fraser, 1834— ; George
Ingram, 184 -44 ; John Burke, 1850-
53.]
Annan.— Andrew Carnson, 1794- ;
after Mr. Carnson there were four
or five pastors whose names cannot
be traced ; Church re-formed, 1838 ;
again re-formed, 1843 ; Sujiplies,
1843-46; Ebenezer Young, 1847-88;
George Kennedy, 1889-91 ; J. John-
stone, 1891-96 ; George Hayton,
1896.
Anstruther- Easter.— — Hastie,
1802-06; — Japp, 1808-26; John
Murdoch, 1830-44 ; JohnM'Dougall,
1844- ; W. J. Craig, 1847- ; G.
Wisely, 1854- ; Ebenezer Ken-
nedy, 1854-58; Hugh Stewart,
1858- ; John Geddes, 1871-72;
J. H. Paterson, 1872- ; John
Whitson, 1878- ; James Russell,
1891 ; Alexander Macaulay, 1900.
Arbroath. — Keptie Street. — Gil-
bert Paterson, 1865-73; R. Snow-
down, 1874-SO ; Daniel Galbraith,
1881-83 ; A. F. Ferguson, 1884-88 ;
Robert ;Rae, 1889-96 ; Gordon L.
M'Lachlan, 1896-1900.
Queen Sreet.— Thomas Smith,
1801-03; Richard Penman, 1805-14;
Udny Anderson, 1815- ; — Ram-
say, 18 - ; John Moir, 1840-43 ;
John Gillies, 1848-79 ; Alexander
Milne, 1879-90; James Wylie, 1890-
93; J. Miller, 1894-1900; G. K.
Cuthbert, 1900.
Ardrossan.— Peter Mather, 1838-
46; Alexander Cross, 1846-87; J.
L. King, 1888-92; J. M. Cowan,
1893-95 ; John Masterton, 1897.
Arran. — Alexander Mackay, 1806-
56; John Blacklock, 1860-78; Allan
Macdougall, 1878.
Avoch, Ross-shire. — Alex. Dewar,
1807-49 ; John M'Kinven, 1850-58 ;
David W. Philip, 1858-85 ; George
Moir, 1885-88 ; Thomas Kerr, 1889.
Avonbridge. — Robert Anderson,
1851- ; John Reid, 185 - ; —
M'Naughton, 1860-63; P. M'Nish,
1863-66 ; Sujjplies, 1866-81 ; William
Crombie, 1881-84; R. Rae, 1884-
87; M. Richmond, 1887-95; John
Heggie, 1896 ; 1900.
Ayr.— [Alexander M'Lean, 1808-35;
Robert Lang, 1835- ; H. L. Berry,
1839-40; John Smith, 1842-44;
John Hunter, 1845-47; James
M'Connachie, 1848- ; DanielJack-
son, 1865-68; W. Metcalfe, 1869-
73.]
MoRisoN Church. — A. H.
M'Connachie, 1898.
[Banff.— Joseph Gibb, 1809-29 ; John
Hunter, 1833-79; B. J. Barker,
1879-82; J. F. M'Hardy, 1882-84;
W. M'Lean, 1884-86.]
Barrhead.— Gilbert M'Callum, 1846-
52 ; Alexander Davidson, 1853-60 ;
J. Andrew, 1861-66 ; John Geddes,
1867-70; A. M'Nair, 1873-78; —
Leith, 1879-81 ; Edward Bruce Kirk,
1883.
Bathgate.— Robert Morison, 1812-
55; A. C. Gray, 1856-60; A. M.
Fairbairn, D.D., 1860-72; A. M.
Wilson, 1873-88; Charles Richard-
son, 1888-92; William Kirk, 1892-
1900 ; C. Nicholson, 1900.
Beith.— Stephen Todd, 1862-65; T.
G. Salmon, 1865-69; .John Whitson,
1870-78 ; Archibald Bowman, 1879-
1900.
Bellshill- — Fergus Ferguson, sen.,
1843-46 ; H. Riddell, 1847- ; John
Inglis, 18 - ; A. Drummond,
1860-71; R. Snowdown, 1872-74;
George Wisely, 1874-78; R. W.
Jackson, 1879-85; A. M. Higgins,
1885-87 ; R. W. R. Trenwith ;
1888.
Blairgowrie- —Peter Grant, 1807-17 ;
John Lyall, 1824- ; John Tait,
1835-66; J. E. Dobson, 1867- ;
John Miller, 1869-78 ; E. Marshall
Tennant, 1879.
Blantyre.— William Wyllie, 1878-
87; R. Paterson, 1887-98; R.
W'hiteford, 1898.
Brechin. — Alexander Cossar, 1871-
75; Peter M'Lish, Evangelist, 1877-
79 ; Alexander Mitchell, 1880.
Broughty Ferry.— James Bailey,
1864-70; R. C. Jessop, 1871-72; A.
J. Bedells, 1873-75 ; Edwin Heath,
1876.
PASTORATES
247
Cambuslang. — John Paterson, 1803-
04 ; William Craig, 1804-05 ; Alex.
Kerr, 1806-25 ; David Murdoch,
1829-32 ; James Geddes, 1833-37 ;
John M'Eobert, 1838-46 ; J. Pullar,
1857-59; Robert Pirrie, 1859- ;
James Virtue, 1862-66 ; John John-
ston, 1866-70; R. D. Hutchison,
1870-72; T. Brisbane, 1872-95; S.
Tucker, 1895-1900.
[Gampbeltown.-Duncan M'Pherson,
1805- ; Daniel M'Keich, 1829-36 ;
David Webster, 1840-42; A. G.
Forbes, 18 -46 ; Thomas Light-
body, 1846- ; D. Galbraith, 1849-
.]
Carluke.— John Hamilton, 1846-50;
William Jeffrey, 1853-58 ; David
Drummond, 1858-60; James Howie,
1861-62 ; James Gunn, 1864-66 ;
Adam Scott, 1867-69 ; John Miller,
1869-74; John Adam, 1874-86;
Gilbert Paterson, 1886.
Catrine. — George Anderson, 1849-52 ;
William Anderson, 1852-54; Robert
Hunter, 1854-58 ; John Reid, 1859-
60; John Miller, 1860-61; James
Foote, 1863-67; David Greenhill,
18 -69; W. J. Craig, 1875-84;
Robert Paissell, 1884-91 ; James
Hamilton, 1894.
Clydebank.— Robert M 'Queen, 1893-
1900 ; T. M'Kendrick, 1900.
Coatbridge. — Albert Street. —
John Inglis, 1860- ; James Foote,
1867-71; John Inglis, 1871- ; R.
Good Willie, 1875- ; George Peebles,
1883- ; John L. King, 1884 ; David
Hobbs, 1884-95 ; Maxwell R. Kirk-
patrick, 1896.
Buchanan St. — David Beaton,
D.D., 1877-81 ; John Jenkins, 1883-
86 ; W. Rosling, 1886-89 ; John Blair,
1889.
Coatdyke. — Kippen St. — Thomas
Whiteside, 1898.
Coupar-AngUS.— J. Frame, 1850 ;
R. Wallace, 1855-76 ; J. J. Brown,
1877-81 ; J. D. Brown, 1882 ; D. S.
M'Lachland, 1884-89 ; William
Tiplady, 1890-91 ; D. Z. H. Forson,
1892.
Crieflf.— Davidson Black, 1870-75;
James Bell, 1876-82; J. M. Sloan,
1882-83 ; J. F. M'Hardy, 1884-98 ;
Alexander Robinson, 1899.
[Cullen.— C. A. Piper, 1846-54 ; David
Brown, 1854-62; C. H. Murray,
1867-69 ; John Taylor, 1872-77.]
Cumnock. — James Sime, 1840-42 ;
P. W. Grant, 1844- ; John
M'Auslane, 1853- ; Thomas Bris-
bane, 1866-72 ; John Murray, 1873-
76; F. Lamb, 1877-81; A. N.
Scott, 1882-84; W. Matheson,
1884.
Dalbeattie.— John Inglis, 1866-72;
Thomas D. Hogg, 1872-74 ; Robert
Robertson, 1875-77 ; John M.
Sloan, 1878-80 ; John Cameron,
1881-92 ; John Penman, 1892-1900 ;
J. L. Gower, 1900.
Dalkeith. --Croft Street. -Supplies,
1847-56; —Hamilton, 1856-58; Alex-
ander French, 1858-59 ; Supplies,
1859-63 ; William Dunlop, 1863-66 ;
Nisbet Galloway, 1866-68; Supplies,
1868-70; John Morton, 1870-80;
T. H. Walker, 1880-83; R. D.
Mitchell, 1885-1900.
High Street. — -Alexander
Arthur, 1804-29; Edward Napier,
1831-42; A. T. Gowan, 1843-72;
A. F. Simpson, 1872-92; W. R.
M. M'Aleese, 1894.
Dalmellington. — Robert Brown,
1872-75; Robert Steel, 1875-89;
D. H. Z. Forson, 1889-92; A.
Scoullar, 1898.
Darvel. — William Landells, D.D.,
184 - ; John MTntosh, 1885-97 ;
J. E. Christie, 1898.
[Denholm.— Robert Wilson, 1835-42;
John Spence, 1844- ; John
M 'Robert, 184 - .]
[Doune.— George Wight, 1843-47;
John Craig, 1847-57 ; D. B. Mac-
kenzie, 1858.]
Dreghorn. — Robert Paterson, 1864-
66; AngusM'Phee, 18 - ; Rich.
Goodwillie, 1872-75; George
Peebles, 1877-80; J. L. Hill, 1881-
82 ; Thomas M 'Robert, 1882.
Dumbarton. — James Paterson, 1878-
86; James Monie, 1886-92; J.
Wilson Crawford, 1892.
Dumfries. — Irving Street. — Wm
Watson, 1806-09 ; John Dunn, 1809
20 ; Thomas Young, 1828-33 ; Robt
Machray, 1835-42 ; James Cameron
1843-47 ; James Mann, 1847-
Thomas Pullar, 1852- ; R. Mach
ray, 1855-69 ; John Park, 1870-73
H. Campbell, LL.D., 1873-77; F,
Binns, 1877-82; W. H. Pulsford
1883- ; W. A. M'Cubbin, 1894-1900
Dumfries. — Waterloo Place. —
James Strachan, 1870.
248
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Duncanston. — Donald Morrison,
1808-46; Patrick Morrison, 1846-
; Peter Why te, 1851-56 ; Thomas
Brisbane, 1856-66 ; A. F. Simpson,
1866-68 ; James M'Connachie, 1869-
83; R. H. Smith, 1883-93; L.
Williamson, 1893.
Dundee. — Castle Street. — Alex.
Hannay, 1855-62; David Johnson,
1863-4; George Thompson, 1865-67 ;
F. Clark, 1868-72 ; J. H. Crawford,
1873-93; J. Vickery, 1894.
Lindsay Street. — D. K. Shoe-
botham, 1834-45 ; Thomas Reekie,
1846-47; David Cook, 1847-72;
John Wallace, 1872-76; William
Home, 1877-82 ; S. G. Kelly, 1883-
84 ; Alfred Gardner, 1884.
GiLFiLLAN Memorial Church. —
David Macrae, 1879-99; Walter
Walsh, 1899.
MORISON Chapel. — M. Cameron,
1866-67; P. M'Nish, 1869-77; J.
Monie, 1878-85 ; A. D. Denholm,
1886-93 ; A. J. Forson, 1893.
Panmure Street. — Robert Lang,
1853-72; W. J. Cox, 1872-95;
Thomas Johnstone, 1896.
Princes Street. — Andrew Rus-
sell, 1840-45 ; Alexander Hannay,
1846-55; R. H. Smith, 1856-59;
Maurice J. Evans, 1859-63 ; R. H.
Irvine, 1863-68; George Campbell,
1869-80; John Park Noble, 1881-90;
David Barran, 1891.
PvUSsell Church. — JohnMasson,
1866-78 ; Jonathan Roebuck, 1879-
92; David Caird, 1892-95; Thomas
Templeton, 1895-1900 ; W. H. Ches-
son, 1900.
Trinity Church. — A. M.Wilson,
1848-51 ; A. C. Rutherford, 1851-56;
Hugh Riddell, 1856-60; William
Ross, 1860-61 ; John Miller, 1861-
66; John Andrew, 1866-72; William
Hamilton, 1872.
Ward Chapel Church. — This
church was formed by members of
three Independeut Churches in Dun-
dee : 1. Barrack Street Church,
which was formed by members of
an Anti-burgher Church in 1769,
of which Messrs. A. Scott, Kirk-
caldy, and William Maxton, were
pastors. 2. West-Port Church,
which was formed in 1797 by mem-
bers of a Relief Church, of which
Messrs. Hartly andJ. Campbell were
pastors. 3. The "Tabernacle"
Church, formed in 1801, of which
Mr. William Innes was pastor. In
1810 Dr. David Russell became pastor
of WUrd Chapel Church, composed
of members of those three churches,
and was succeeded by P^obert Lang,
1849-53 ; Robert Spence, 1853-70 ;
Charles Short, 1870-92 ; Dr. K. C.
Anderson, 1892.
Dunfermline.— Bath St.— Supplies,
1850-53 ; R. G. Harper, 1853-54 ;
James Frame, 1855-56 ; Nisbet
Galloway, 1862-68 ; John Adams,
1869-70 ; James Foote, 1871.
Canmore St. — George Thomp-
son, 1840-46 ; R. H. Craig, 1847- ;
A. M'Auslane, D.D., 1852-58 ; John
Hutchison, 1859-65 ; James Robbie,
1865-81 ; F. Binns, 1882-89 ; D. L.
Ritchie, 1889-96 ; Alex. M'Lennan,
1897.
[Dunkeld.— John Campbell, 1801-04 ;
R. Kinniburgh, 1809-10; John
Black, 1814-57.]
Dunoon.— J. B. Allan, 1900.
Edinburgh. — Albany St. — William
Innes, D.D., 18 ; George Payne,
D.D., 18 - ; Gilbert Wardlaw,
1823.30; Henry Wilkes, D.D.,
1833-36; Alexander Fraser, 18 -
42 ; J. R. Campbell, D.D., 1844- ;
William Pulsford, D.D., 1856-65;
James Cranbrook, 1865-67 ; John
Pulsford, D.D., 1867-84; A. J.
Basden, colleague, 1881-82; A. B.
Morris, 1883.
Augustine Church. — John Aik-
man, 1803-34 ; John Cleghorn, col-
league, 1812-34 ; W. Lindsay Alex-
ander, D.D., 1835-77 ; Jas. Gregory,
1880-95 ; A. R. Henderson, 1895.
Bristo Place. — John Kirk, D.D.,
1845-76 ; John Mackintosh, 1876-
84; Robert Craig, D.D., 1885.
BuccLEucH Street. — G. T. M.
Inglis, 1860-66 ; Robert Paterson,
1866-67; William Adamson, D.D.,
1868-95 : Robert Pvae, 1896.
Dalry (Caledonian Rd.). — James
Stark, 1872-77; Robert Auchter-
lonie, 1877.
Dalry (Murieston Crescent). —
John Kirk, 1891.
Hope Park. —Henry Wight, 1832-
43 ; C. H. Bateman, 1843-46; Henry
Wight, 1846-60; W. J. Cox, co-
pastor, 1855-60 ; Edward Price,
1860- ; Ninian Wight, 186 -72;
John Werayss, 1873.
PASTORATES
249
Edinburgh. — Kirk Memorial,
Abbey Mount. — John Adam, 1891.
MoRNiNGsiDE. — W, Douglas
M'Kenzie, 1889-95; David Caird,
1895-1900.
Newington, Literary Institute.
—Lewis C. Hammond, 1899-1900.
PiCARDY Place. — John Ander-
son, 1897-98 ; John Nicol, 1899.
Sydney Hall. — A. Robertson,
1874-95 ; Supplies, 1895-1900.
Elgin.— William Ballantine, 1804-07 ;
Niel M'Niel, 1808-54; John Burke,
colleague, 1853-54; Archibald Guth-
rie, 1854- ; James Stark, 1864-72 ;
James Anderson, 1872-78 ; James S.
Swan, 1879-93 ; John Shields, 1893.
[Elie. Gilbert, 1805-08; George
Douglas, 1808-18; Puller, 1818-
29 ; D. B. Mackenzie, 1840- ; John
Hutchison, 1852-58 ; David Long-
wise, 1859- ; David Johnston, 186 .]
Eyemouth.— R. Finlay, 1864-69 ;
W. Wyllie, 1873-78; R. Jackson,
1879-85 ; W. Wyllie, 1887-93; T. G.
Taylor, 1895-97; C. Nicholson,
1897-1900.
Falkirk.- [Robert Caldwell, 1804-1 3 ;
—Edwards, 1814- ; William
M'Nab, 1845- ; W. Wilson, 1853-
; James M'Lean, 1852-67 ; J.
Anderson, 1867-88; J. D. Buchan,
1888-98 1
[Trinity— A. C. Rutherford, 1843-
; Alex. Duncanson, co-jjastor,
18 - ; George Bell, 1874-77 ; John
Spaven, 1877-79 ; John Morton,
1879-82; John L. King, 1882-84;
R. W. Jackson, 1885-96; Alex.
Pollock, 1896.]
[Falkland.— James Gordon, 1807-10 ;
— Bain, 1837-38; — Elrick, 1838-
42; — Smith, 1843-46; George
Greig, 1847- .]
Forfar- — Mr. Francis Dick and others,
1832-35; William Low, 1836-60;
F. S. Johnstone, 1861-66 ; John
Coyle, 1866-68 ; D. L. M'Corkindale,
1871-90 ; W. Paterson, 1890.
Forres.— John Martin, 1804-34; R.
Weir, 1837-43 ; Nisbet Galloway,
1844-47 ; John Jefferson, 1848-50 ;
William Bathgate, 1850-57 ; Robert
Hunter, 1858-65 ; Robert Kerr,
1866-70; John Miller, 1873-90;
James Neil, 1890-94 ; R. L. Hunter,
1895-98 ; H. Elder, 1899.
Foula, Shetland. — Laureuce Christie,
1819- ; Laurence Eraser, 1849- ;
R. Georgeson, 18 - ; George
Morrison, 1880-95; P. S. Brown,
1896.
Fraserburgh. — Manse Street. —
Archibald Duff, 1845-47 ; — Ander-
son, 18 - ; — Denison, 18 - ;
William Hutchison, 18 - ; Jamea
A, Gray, 18 - ; T. G. Sal-
mond, James Cameron, 187 -78;
R. Trenwith, 18 - ; James M.
Cown, 18 - ; Joseph L. King,
18 - ; Alexander Macaulay,
1897-1900; James Stirling, 1900.
Mid Street.— Udny Anderson,
1803-15 ; Alexander Begg, 1819- ;
Archibald Duff, 1841-45; A. Forbes,
1846- ; James Robbie, 18 -65 ;
John Wemyss, 1866-73 ; James
Hill, 1873-83 ; James Stirling, 1884;
A. J. Parker, 1900.
Galashiels. — James B. Robertson,
1844-48; James Howie, 1852-56;
Alexander Brown, 1861-76; J. C.
Nesbitt, 1877-81; W. F. Adam-
son, 1883.
Galston. — David Drummond, 1842-
46; James M'Millan, 1847-49;
— M'Phee, 1849-50; James
Pearson, 1850- ; James M'Con-
nachie, 1851-56 ; Thomas Suttie,
1861-70 ; Robert Inglis Gray, 1870-
83; Daniel Galbraith, 1883-85;
Charles Crossthwaite, 1886-88 ;
Robert Steel, 1889-98; J. D.
M'Culloch, 1898.
Garliestown. — Thomas Smith,
1803-29; — Wiseman, 1830-32;
Thomas Young, 1832-71 ; John
M'Auslane, 1871-77 ; John Brooke,
1878-79 ; J. B. Johnstone, 1880-83 ;
Alexander Sutherland, 1884-87 ;
R. M. Cairney, 1887-93 ; J. S.
Thomson, 1893-1900.
Glasgow. — [Bath Street. — S. T.
Porter, 1849-1873.]
Bethany Church. ^ — T. Mathie-
son, 1871-77 ; R. Dey, 1878-81 ; D.
E. Irons, 1881.
Calton, Bain Street. — John S.
Hainstock, 1899.
Dalmarnock Road (formerly
West Street Church, Calton). —
Robert Anderson, 1858-87 ; John
Muir, 1888-91 ; J. Mathieson For-
son, 1892.
Dennistoun. — William Arnott,
1878.
Dundas Street. — John Guthrie,
D.D., 1848-51; JamesMorison.D.D.,
250
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
1851-84; Alex. Davidson (colleague),
1860-62; Robert Mitchell (col-
league), 1864-68; Ebenezer Leal
(colleague), 1869-76 ; George Glad-
stone (colleague and successor), 1876.
G-lasgOW. — Eglinton Street. —
Edward Campbell, 1826-36 ; Peter
Mather, 1836-38 ; David Russell,
D.D., 1839-89; Jas. Ross (colleague
and successor), 1881.
Elgin Place. — Ralph Ward-
law, 1803-53; S. T. Porter (col-
league), 1848-49 ; Alex. Raleigh,
1855-58; Henry Batchelor, 1859-
75; Albert Goodrich, 1876-90;
Eynon Davies, 1891-96 ; Ambrose
Shepherd, 1898.
Emmanuel Church. — James
M'Lean, 1872-82 ; W. T. Thornton,
1883-85; James Grant, 1885-90;
James Al'Lean, 1891-99; James
Russell, 1899.
Ferguson Memorial Church,
Springburn. — Alexander Peat, 1890-
; Thomas Pearson, 1893-97 ;
Robert Rollo, 1897.
Govanhill, Cathcart Road. —
Robert Wallace, 1877-88 ; William
Forsyth, 1888.
Great Hamilton Street. —
David Johnstone, 1850-68 ; John
M'Munn, 1868-76 ; J. B. John-
stone, 1876-79; W. H. Walker,
1880-86 ; John Jenkins, 1886.
Guthrie Memorial Church,
Moncur Street. — William Halli-
ay, 1877.
HiLLHEAD. — Greville Ewing,
1800-39 ; J. Morell Mackenzie, col-
league, 1837-39 ; Alex. Thomson,
1842-46; Alexander Fraser, 1847- ;
R. W. Thompson, 1865-71 ; George
Stewart, 1871-79 ; Fredk. Smith,
1882 ; Alexander Cowe, 1884-97 ;
H. H. Suell, 1898-99; Thomas
Templeton, 1900.
Hutchesontown, Rutherglen
Road.— T. R. Atkinson, 1874- ;
J. M'Munn, 1880-81 ; H. W. J.
Miller, 1881-82; Thomas Havre,
1883-85; G. C. Milne, 1885-93;
E. L. Morris, 1893.
Maryhill. — J. Baxter, 1900.
Montrose Street.— Fergus Fer-
guson, D.D., 1845-97; Robert
Craig, D.D. (colleague), 1864-76;
Charles Richardson, 1898.
Hood Memorial Church, Mus-
lin Street, Bridgeton. — Robert
Simpson, 1844-45 ; William Bath-
gate, 1846-47 ; Nisbet Galloway,
1848-62; Robert Hood, 1862-94;
J. A. Lees, 1894-97 ; A. D. Ander-
son, 1898.
Glasgow. — Nelson Street. — Samuel
Chisholm, 1850-53; John Andrew,
1855- ; R. G. Harper, 1857- ;
Hugh Riddell, 1859- ; William
Dunlop, 1875.
New City Road. — John Douglas,
1868-96 ; W. S. Todd, 1897.
North Hanover Street (for-
merly Albion Street) Church. —
Thomas Pullar, 1835; George
Ingram, 1844 ; A. G. Forbes,
IS ; P. Grenville, 1866-70 ; W.
E. Irons, 1871-72 ; David Cook,
1872- ; Church dissolved, 1878.
OldScotsIndependent Church,
Oswald Street. — This church has
been presided over by "Elders,"
although one of them is called the
" Pastor." Of those who suc-
cessively have held this office no
information has been obtained.
[Parkgrove. — P. Grenville,
1870-79; David Jamieson, 1880.]
Parkhead. — David Gardner,
1873-76 ; John Graham, 1876.
Partick. — James Grant, 1891.
Pollokshields. — And. Hamil-
ton, 1900.
Trinity Church. — William
Pulsford, D.D., 1865-86; John
Hunter, D.D., 1887.
Wardlaw Church, Bellgrove
Street.— Gilbert M'Callum, 1857-
71 ; Alex. Craib, 1871-81 ; E. D.
Solomon, 1881-85; D. M'Kinnon,
1886-97 ; W. N. Challice, 1897.
Waterloo Street, Ebenezer
Church. — William Scott, 1845-
77; John Guthrie, D.D., senior
pastor, 1877-78 ; Robert Hislop,
1877-98 ; W. F. Riddell, 1899. (In
1877 the Church in Waterloo Street
and the Church in West Campbell
Street, of which the Rev. John
Guthrie, D.D. , was pastor, united ;
and the union was followed by the
retirement of the Rev. W. Scott.
Dr. Guthrie remained as senior or
honorary pastor of the united
Church till the following year (1878),
when he died.
Whiteinch. — James Bell, 1897.
[Gourock.— J. M. Sloan, 1880-82 ; J.
C. Nesbitt, 1883- .]
PASTORATES
251
Govan. — Elder Park Street. —
Robert Simpson, 1870-S7 ; Daniel
M'Kenzie (colleague and successor),
1876-91 ; James Edwards, 1892- .
Govan. — James's Place. — C. A.
Crosthwaite, 1897-98; James C.
Neill, 1899.
White Street. — William Reid,
1869-70; George Gladstone, 1871-
76; Alex. Denholm, 1877-79;
Robert Paterson, 1880-84; E. J.
Boon, 1885.
Greenock. — • George Square. —
John Hercus, 1806-30 ; Alexander
Lyle, 1832-34 ; Alexander Campbell,
1836-44; Alexander Raleigh, 1845-
48 ; J. M. Jarvie, 1851-92 ; W. H.
Addicott, 1892.
Mearns Street. — T. W. Bow-
man, D.D., 1883-89; J. C. Neil,
1889-95 ; R. C. Richardson, 1895.
Nelson Street. — A. C. Ruther-
ford, 1845-50 ; John Guthrie, 1851-
62 ; Alexander Davidson, 1862-67 ;
W. Richmond Scott, 1887-91; Robert
Mitchell, 1892-93; Andrew Ritchie,
1894.
St. Lawrence Street. — George
Moir, 1871-78; Robert Bell, 1878-
97 ; W. J. Ainslie, 1897.
[Haddington.— James Hill, 1804-12;
William Ritchie, 1813-29 ; R. Fer-
guson, LL.D., 1830-32; Andrew
Russell, 1833-40; A. Gosman,
1855-58 ; William M'Lellan, 1861-
67.]
Hamilton. -Auchingrammont Road
—John Wilson, 1807-11 ; — Alex-
ander, 1822-34; John Moir, 1835-39;
John Kirk, 1839-45; John Hart,
1846-50; Patrick Morrison, 185U-53 ;
Thomas PuUar, 1854-58 ; James
Proctor, 1859-60; Adam Dunlop,
1860-65 ; James Sime, 1865-68 ;
Daniel Jackson, 1868-85; W. S.
Thomson, 1885.
Park Road. — J. B. Robertson,
185 - ; — Maconnochie, 18 - ;
Alexander Wilson, 18 - ; James
Cameron, 18 - ; Daniel Craig,
1871-74; Alexander Denholm, 1875-
76 ; George Bell, 1877.
Harray and Sandwick, Orkney.—
John Masson, 1835- ; David
Brown, 1846-54 ; R. Harvey, 1851-
57 ; D. L. M'Corkindale, 1860-70 ;
W. N. Challice, 1870-75; W. H.
Philip, 1876- ; David Smith,
1881-1900.
Hawick.— [Charles Gray, 1805- ;
William Munro, 1837-70 ; W. L.
Walker, 1873-76; W. Matheson,
1877.]
Hawick.— Archibald Duff, 1848-56 ;
James Proctor, 1857-58 ; Robert
Mitchell, 1860-64; David Hislop,
1864.
Helensburgh. Sym, 1803-08 ;
— ■ Edwards, 1809-15; — Boag, and
supplies, 1815-23 ; John Arthur,
1.324-66 ; James Troup (colleague),
1858-66 ; William Milne, 1866-69 ;
James Troup, 1869-97; William
Blair, 1898.
Huntly. — George Cowie, pastor of
Anti-burgherChurch, 1771-1800, and
of Congregational Church, 1800-05;
Supplies, 1808-17 ; Donald Morrison,
1805-08 ; John Hill, 1817-48 ; Robert
Troup, 1849-77 ; John Pillans, 1877-
91; Thomas Templeton, 1891-96;
W. J. Collier, 1896.
Innerleithen. — William Dobson,
1848-67 ; Archibald Cree, 1868-76 ;
James Grant, 1877-85; Alex. Mann,
1886-91 ; J. M. Dryerre, 1891-96 ;
T. M'Kendrick, 1896-1900.
Insch, Aberdeenshire. — Jn. Graham,
1874-76 ; James Murray, 1877-78 ;
T. Havre, 1879-84; Jas. Edwards,
1885-92; L. Williamson, 1893.
[Inverkip (Auld Kirk). — G. Robert-
son, 1802-07; Thomas Low, 1808-51.]
[Inverness. — James Kennedy, 1825-
62; William Milne, 1870-72; —
Wright, 1872-75.]
Inverurie. — William Brown, 1824-
29; Alexander Smith, 1835-42;
John Miller, 1843-69; J. B. John-
stone, 1870-76 ; David Jamieson,
1876-80; J. Petrie Wilson, 1880-
84 ; F. A. Russell, 1885-87 ; James
Wylie, 1887-90; William Rae, 1891-
93; J. A. Hardie, 1893; William
Muir, 1894.
Kilmarnock.— [J. Campbell, D.D.,
1827-29; John Hill, 1829-32; —
Ward, 18.32-37 ; J. Dickeman, 1838-
42; Robert Weir, 1843- ; John
Campbell, 1855-59; A. W. Lowe,
1860- ; J. C. MTntosh, 1862- .]
Clerk's Lane. — James Morison,
D.D., 1840-51 ; Davidson Black,
1853-55; William Bathgate, D.D.,
1857-60; Robert Hislop, 1864-77;
Robert Borland, 1878-80 ; James
Forrest, 1880-90; Alex. Webster,
18 - ; Matthew Scott, 18 - .
252
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
WiNTON Place.— William Bath-
gate.D.D., 1860-79; A. C. Denholm,
1879-86; Alexander M'Nair, 1886.
Kilsyth.— John C. Anderson, 1858-
59; J. C. Jago, 1865-69; David
Gardner, 1869-73; G. Rutherford,
1874-85 ; J. C. Hodge, 1885-92 ; M.
P. Noble, 1893.
Kilwinning.— K. Hunter, 18 - ;
J. Salmond, 18 - ; Alexander
Wilson, 18 - ; R. Trenwith,
J. Russell, 18 - ; R. Rollo, 1894-
97 ; Andrew Kirk, 1898.
Kirkcaldy. — West End. — Archi-
bald M'Lae, 1800-03 ; James Mit-
chell, 1806-08 ; William Brown,
1808-09 ; Robert Aitkenhead, 1811-
49 ; James Robbie, 1849-59 ; D. R.
Cowan, 1859-69 ; George M'Hardy,
D.D., 1869.
Pathhead.— E. J. Boon, 1870-85;
Robert Jackson, 1886-91 ; W.
Wylie, 1893.
Kirkwall.— John Black, 1806 ; David
Ramsay, 1807- ; GeorgeRobertson,
1814-34; Thomas Smith M'Kean,
1838- ; D. Webster, ' 1842-47 ;
George Smith, 1847-52; James
M'Naughton, 1852-59; W. N. Chal-
lice, 1868-70; Alexander Smith,
1870-72 ; Alexander Pirie, 1873-83 ;
J. Hodge, 1883-85; John Blair,
1886-89 ; Kenneth M'Kenzie, 1890-
92 ; J. W. Chalmers, 1893-94 ;
George Gerrard, 1896.
[Kirriemuir. Dunbar, 18 - ;
— Collins, IS -24; R. Machray,
1825-29.]
Lanark.— John Inglis, 1849- ; —
M'Dowall, 18 - ; James David-
son, 1863-72: William Arnott,
1872-77 ; William Forsyth, 1878-
88; J. W. Crawford, 1889-92; J.
C. M'Lachlan, 1893-98; D. S.
Aitken, 1898.
Langholm.— James Cron, 1864-65;
James M. Campbell, 1866-73; R.
Boreland, 1874-77; W. Richmond
Scott, 1878-87 ; Andrew Ritchie,
1888-94; George M'Kendrick, 1894-
1900 ; R. M'Queen, 1900.
Larkhall.— George Wood, 1875-78 ;
Robert Brown, 1878-83; A. M.
Higgins, 1883-85 ; James Rae,
I887.
Laurencekirk. — David Moir, 1842-
45; A. Stuart Muir, 1846- ;
D. Webster, 1846-49; Andrew
Noble, 1851-72; D. Smith, 1872-
79 ; J. Tait Scott, 1880-84 ; W. A.
Farquhar, 1884-86; William Muir,
1887-94; W. L. Walker, 1894.
Leith. — Constitution Street. —
William Henry, 1817-22; George
D. Cullen, 1822-56; Angus Gal-
braith, 1857-60 ; W. J. Cox, 1860-
72 ; George Allen, 1873-87 ; David
Robb, 1888.
Duke Street. — Ebenezer Ken-
nedy, 1844-51; Supplies, 1851-53;
Joseph Boyle, 1853-62 ; David His-
lop, 1862-64 ; Robert Hunter, 1865-
78; Alexander M'Nair, 1879-86;
Alexander Davidson, 1887-91 ;
Charles Richardson, 1892-98; Hugh
Jenkins, 1898.
Lerwick.— George Reid, 1808-45 ;
Neil M'Kechnie, 1838-40; W. L.
Brown, 1840- ; R. H. Craig,
1844- ; J. M'Kniven, 1858- ;
James Troup, 1865-69 ; J. E. Dob-
sou, 1870-75; J. M'Munn, 1876-
78; W. A. Farquhar, 1878-84;
Alexander Yeats, 1884-87 ; John
Anderson, 1888-93 ; J. L. Gower,
1893-95 ; H. B. Aldridge, 1896.
[Letham. — William Lindsay, 1804-
41; John Masson, 1849-54; C. A.
Piper, 1854-64 ; George Moir, 1864-
■]
[Leven.— John Elder, 1802-34; E.
Cornwall, 1835-43 ; Boyd Roebuck,
1843-48 ; James Hamilton, 1848- .]
Linlithgow.— A. W. Knowles, 1807-
49; \V. Wilson, 1850-53; D.
Webster, 1853-60; A. C. Peacock,
1861-62; James Ross, 1862-64;
James Lemon, 1865-67 ; John Craig,
1867-78; James Rae, 1879-82; John
Ure, 1890-91 ; James Cameron,
1892.
[Lochee. — Alex. Thompson, 1803-
18; James Dalrymple, 1821-26;
Church dissolved, 1829.]
Macduff.— G. C. Milne, 1879-85;
M. P. Noble, 1886-93 ; A. E. Gar-
vie, 1893-95 ; A. Drummond, 1895.
Melrose. — Ebenezer Young, 1841-47;
William Crombie, 1847-85 ; W. G.
Allan, 1887-95; — Hill, 1895-96;
James Groat, 1897-98 ; J. King,
1898.
Millseat, Banffshire. — Joseph Mor-
rison, 1831-56; George Saunders,
1856-80 ; Alexander Francis, 1880,
89 ; William Murray, 1890.
Montrose. — Baltic Street. — Geo.
Cowie, 1801-05 ; supplies, 1805-08 ;
PASTORATES
253
John Black, 1810-14 ; George Cowie,
1814-24; John Wilson, 1827-28;
Alex. Ciithbert 1830-33; J. R.
Campbell, 1835-44; Hugh Hercus,
1844-55; Peter Whyte, 1856-72;
Sydney Morris, 1873-76 ; James
Ross, 1876-81 ; W. D. Mackenzie,
1882-89; A. R. Henderson, 1889-95;
A. E. Garvie, 1895.
Montrose. — John Street. — A. C.
Wood, 18 - ; Davidson Black,
18 - ; Wm. Hutchison, 18 - ;
David Hislop, 1858-62; William
Halliday, 18 - ; John Whitson,
18 - ; Robert Paterson, 18 - ;
John Robertson, 1876-80 ; John
Baxter, 1881-84; J. C. M'Lachlan,
1885-93 ; Robert Jackson, 1893.
Motherwell- -David Greenhill, 18 -
83; W. S. Todd, 1884-97; John
Mackintosh, 1897.
Muirkirk- — James Munro, 18 - ;
J. L. King, 18 - ; Jn. Robertson,
18 - ; T. A. Hill, 1889- ; D. S.
Aitken, 1895-98; T. S. Loudon, 1899.
Musselburgh. —Fisher Row.— John
Watson, 1806-44 ; James Mann,
1845- ; William Ingram, 1853-58 ;
David Johnson, 1861-63 ; Matthew
Simpson, 1863-89; J. M'Munn,
18 - ; David Farquharson, 1893.
Town Hall, High Street. — A.
D. Anderson, 1888-90; Edward
Aston, 1890-91.
Nairn. — James Dewar, 1806-43; John
Gillies, 1844-47 ; James Howie,
1847-57 ; William Ingram, 1858-59 ;
J. B.- Johnstone, 1859-70; R. Dey,
1871-78; Charles White, 1878-85;
W. J. Thornton, 18S5-S9 ; G. C.
Martin, 1890-95 ; F. J. Japp, 1895.
Newburgh, Fifeshire. — Archibald
Russell, 1847-64 ; James Cameron,
1864-71 ; Nisbet Galloway, 1872-77 ;
James Frame, 1779-81 ; George
Wood, 1881-84; Edward Aston,
1884-91 ; supplies, 1891-95 ; James
Monie, 1895-99; J. R. Ramsay, 1899.
Newcastleton.— D. Black, 1850-51 ;
Supplies, 1851-66; R. Steel, 1866-
75; — TurnbuU, 1876-77; Supplies,
1877-82; J. G. Andrew, 1882-83;
George Davis, 1883-86; William
Paterson, 1877-90 ; John Whitson,
1890-91 ; R. Hunter Craig, 1891-95 ;
Supplies, 1895-99; James W. Gillies,
1899.
New Deer, Aberdeenshire. — James
Rae, 1879.
[New Lanark. — Peter Anderson,
1838-65; George M'Hardy, D.D.,
1865-69.]
New PitsligO. — John Johnston,
1862-66 ; D. J. Gass, 1867-69 ;
Robert Auchterlonie, 1869-74; J.
C. Hodge, 1875-83; J. Bayne,
1884-87 ; R. M'Kinlay, 1891.
Newport, Fife. — Thomas Taylor,
1803-06; Thomas Just, 1806-44;
Samuel Fairly, 18 - ; Thomas
Just, juu. , 18 - ; John Tait,
1867-78 ; Robert Allan, 1878-91 ;
T. W. Hodge, 1891-1900; W.
Wood, 1900.
Oban. —John Campbell, 1811-54;
Charles Whyte, sen., 1855-78 ; John
Blacklock, 1878-79 ; John xM'Neill,
1879-82 ; James M'Lean, 1882-91 ;
Alex. Mann, 1891-96 ; W. Rosling,
1896.
Paisley. — New Street. — Alexander
Wilson, 1846-48; Ebenezer Ken-
nedy, 1851-55; G. T. M. Inglis,
1856-60 ; William Parke, 1860-65 ;
John Spaven, 1866-70 ; Alexander
Wilson, 1870.
School Wynd. — John Young,
1801- ; George Robertson, 1807-
; R. M'Lachlan, 1816-46; Wm.
Ross, 1846 - 54 ; John Renfrew,
1856-67; A. B. Morris, 1867- ;
J. M. Simcock, 1871-80; W. N.
Challice, 1881-98 ; W. J. Dickson,
1898.
Liberal Club Hall. — T. C.
Metrusty, 1897-1900.
Perth. — William Adamson, D.D.,
1857-68 ; Robert Finlay, 1869. In
December, 1896, this church and
the Congregational Church in Mill
Street united. The church in Mill
Street was formed in 1798, by a
secession from Anti-burgher and
Established Churches. Pastors :
James Garie, 1798-1801 ; Robert
Little, 1801-06; John Hinmers,
1806-07 ; William Orme, 1807-24 ;
James Robertson, 1826-28 ; Robert
Machray, 1829-34; R. J. Massie,
1836-41 ; Kerr Johnstone, 1842-47 ;
John Low, 1848 - 51 ; W. D.
Knowles, 1851-84; W. C. Wil-
loughby, 1885-86; David Caird,
1888-92. In 1851 the church in
Canal Street was formed by a
secession from the church in Mill
Street. The pastors were : John
Pillans, 1851-61 ; Thomas Neave,
254
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
1861-65 ; John Wallace, 1865-72 ;
after which the church re-united
with the church in Mill Street.
Peterhead, Scott, 18 - ;
Eobert Massie, 1839- ; David
Cook, 1845-47 ; Robert Harvey,
1848-56 ; R. H. Smith, 1859-67 ;
Alexander Legge, 1868-74; W. C.
Russell, 1875-81 ; Alexander Gray,
1882-83; John M'Munn, 1884-88;
S. Griffiths, 1889-98 ; W. A. Stark,
1899.
Port ErroL— J. D. Hardie, 1883- ;
D. M'Intosh, 1895.
Port-Glasgow.— A. D. Anderson,
1881-87 ; A. Cossar, 1888.
Portobello, — James Cameron, 1837-
43 ; Robert Lang, 1844-49 ; (i. D.
M'Gregor, 1851-54 ; George Wight,
1855-57; J. W. Coombs, 1858-63;
William Low, 1860-69 ; John For-
dyce, 1870-74 ; R. Auchterlonie,
1874-77 ; Edward Walker, 1877-78 ;
James Kennedy, 1878-81 ; W. H.
Davison, 1882-91 ; James Kelly,
1892.
Keawick and Sand, Shetland.—
James Stout, 1842-62; L. Fraser,
186 -75; L. Williamson, 1876 93;
M. Sinclair, 1893.
[RendalL — James Russell, 1835- ;
David Blellock, 1838- ; Alexander
Smith, 1842-70; L. Williamson,
1870-76; Alex. Whyte, 1878-82.]
Kliynie, Aberdeenshire. — Cruick-
shanks, 18 - ; Alexander Nicol,
1843-78; James Cameron, 1878-
80; James Edwards, 1881-85;
W. Singer, 1885-86; Alexander
Yeats, 1887-96 ; G. C. Smith,
1897.
Rutherglen,— John L. King, 1889-
98 ; A. N. Scott, 1899.
St. Andrews. — Thomas Paton, 1805-
18 ; William Lothian, 1819-53 ; John
MTntosh, 1854-62; J. M. Stott,
1864-67 ; John Currie, 1867-76 ; R.
Troup, 1877-95 ; A. Sivewright,
1896.
St. Monans.— John W. Lockie, 1877.
Saltcoats. M 'Do well, 1862-68 ;
E. B. Kirk, 1879-83 ; David Green-
hill, 1883.
Sanquhar. — George Gladstone, 1865-
71 ; George Bell, 1871-74 ; George
Blair, 1876-77 ; Oliver Dryer, 1878-
83; George Davies, 1886-89; John
E. Christie, 1890-98; David W.
Gaylor, 1898.
[Sauchieburn. — Jas. M'Rae (pastor
of "Berean" Church), 1777-1809;
Thomas M'Kinnon, 1811-54.]
Scalloway, Shetland. Gordon,
1840- ; James Fraser, 1845-48;
Nicol Nicolson, 1862-80 ; J. S.
Miller, 1881-82; Alexander Yeats,
1882-84 ; John Currie, 1885.
Selkirk. — Chapel Street. — Present
pastor, W. Russell.
Philiphaugh. — John Nichol,
1856-84 ; William Robertson, 1884-
98 ; D. C. E. Stevenson, 1898.
Shapinshay, Orkney.— T. G. Sal-
mon, 1851-59 ; William Hutchison,
18 - ; William Craig, 18 ;
W. Tiplady, 18 - ; A. T. Hill,
18 - ; M. Richmond, 18 -98; J.
Heggie, 1900.
ShottS. — William Bathgate, 1845-
46 ; — Hutchison, 1847-49 ; — Mac-
onnachie, 1849-51 ; D. Drummond,
1855-56; — Maconnochie, 1857-61 ;
W. Reid, 1861-66; John Whitson,
1866-71 ; D. Drummond, 1871-74;
A. Cossar, 1875-88 ; James Neil,
1888-90 ; R. Russell, 1890-95 ; John
G. M'Garva, 1895.
Stewarton- — William Cunningham,
1827-49; Robert Smith (assistant
and successor), 1843-72 ; George
Peill, 1872-97 ; J. Albert Lees, 1897.
Stirling.— William Henry, 1807-17 ;
Alexander Marshall, 1825-44 ; Andw.
Russell, 1845-58 ; J. Ferguson, 1859-
64 ; James Ross, 1864-70 ; Alex.
Nairn, 1871-76; J. Roebuck, 1877-
79; William M'Lellan, 1879-84;
W. H. Muncaster, 1884-88 ; Wm.
Blair, 1888-97; J. C. M'Lachlan,
1898.
Stonehouse. — Peter Smith, 1894.
[Stuartfield. — Jas. Robertson, 1800-
30; Alex. Cuthbert, 1835-37; Neil
M'Kechnie, 1840-52; Angus Gal-
braith, 1853-57 ; J. Ferguson, 1857-
59 ; Angus Galbraith, 1860-67 ; T.
Mathieson, 1867-71 ; W. Robertson,
1872-77: W. Matheson, 1878-84;
W. M. Reid, 1885-88; James Provan,
1888- ; W. R. Robinson, 1894.]
Sullom, Shetland. — John Nicholson,
1841-45; James Fraser, 1848-84;
D. K. Fisher, 1886- ; A. N. Scott,
1891-98 ; Charles Davidson, 1899.
Thornhill, Dumfries. — James Pear-
son, 1855-59 ; John MTlveen, 1860-
; Alexander Nairn, 1864-67 ;
Inglis Gray, 1867-70; R. D.
PASTORATES
255
Mitchell, 1871-85 ; James Hume,
1885-92; James Wallace, 1892.
Thurso. — William Ballantine, 1799-
1803; James Clarke, 1811-14; —
Taylor, 18 - ; Alexander Ewing,
1818-33; George Robertson, 1833-
48; James Wishart, 1849- ; D.
B. M'Kenzie, 1854-57 ; James Sime,
1858-65; James Virtue, 1866- ;
A. Prentice, 1874-77; W. L.
Walker, 1877-81; W. Stevenson,
1881-84; Wesley Kelly, 1885.
Tillicoultry. —Ann Street. — Geo.
Anderson, 1851-55 ; John Andrew,
1855-60; James Strachan, 1861-65;
Alexander Nairn, 1866-71 ; James
Davidson, 1872.
High Street. — E. D. Solomon,
1873-81 ; Arthur Smith, 1882-83 ;
W. Conn, 188 - ; L. Macfadyen,
1894.
Tiree, Argyllshire. — Archibald Far-
quharson, 1832-78.
Uddingston.— T. W. Bowman, 1878-
83 ; T. H. Walker, 1883.
Walkerburn, Peeblesshire. — B. D.
Morris, 1888-92 ; James Johnstone,
1892-93 ; A. J. Parker, 1894-1900 ;
D. Grigor, 1900.
Walls, Shetland.- — Alexander Kerr,
1825-36 ; Peter Paterson, 1837-57 ;
John Craig, 1857-67; Archibald
Prentice, 1870-74 : L. Eraser, 1875-
92; Samuel Bond, 1892-98; Wm.
Parries, 1899.
WestMll) Aberdeenshire. — John
Smith, 1804-35 ; A. T. Gowan, 1836-
43; Alexander Munro, 1843-64;
John Geddes, 1864-65 ; Robert
Martin, 1869-71 ; Nisbet Galloway,
1872-73 ; D. D. Shotts, 1874- ; —
Kyd, 1879-81 ; George Wisely,
1881-1900.
Wick. — Shore Lane. — John Cleg-
horn, 1799-1813 ; Robert Caldwell,
1813-34 ; — Wiseman, 1834-41 ; G.
Macfarlane, 1842-44 ; James Sime,
1846-53; James Innes, 1854-56;
John Currie, 1856-67; William
M'Lellan, 1867-75 ; David Leith,
1876-79 ; Adam Dunlop, 1880-81 ;
Sydney Tucker, 1888-95; Alex.
M'Lennan, 1895-97; D. R. Scott,
1897.
Victoria Place (Zion Church). —
David Drummond, 1843-52 ; —
Marshall, 1853-59; James Strachan
1860-68 ; William Hutchison, 1868
73; Gilbert Paterson, 1873-77
Matthew Richmond, 1883-84; Robt,
Brown, 1885-92; Arthur M'Con
nachie, 1896-97 ; Alex. T. Hill, 1898
Wishaw.— Robert Gray, 18 -
William Halliday, 18 -76; P,
M'Nish, 1877-94; James Adam
1895.
iVbie. — It was intended to give in the above list the years of
settlement and removal of each pastor, but in many cases this
has been found impossible, owing to defective church records, and
in other cases the correspondence required to supply missing
dates would have led to undue delay in the publication of this
volume.
CHAPTER XX.
STUDENTS OF THE THEOLOGICAL HALLS.
CONGREGATIONAL THEOLOGICAL HALL, 1811i-96.
Date of
Date of
Remarks.
Name.
Church.
admis-
ordina-
sion.
tion.
d. means deceased.
Alexander Ewing
Albion Street, Glasgow
1811
1818
Thurso, Halifax, Gosport, d.
John Hill
Kirkliston
1811
1817
Huntly, d.
Robert M'Lachlan
Nile Street, Glasgow
1811
1816
Paisley, d.
John Maclaren
Killin
1811
1817
Joined the Estab. Church
William Newlands
Albion Street, Glasgow
1811
1815
J) ))
James Fraser
5» )> 1>
1811
Thomas Woodrow
Helensburgh
1815
1819
Carlisle, Canada, d.
Neil M'Kechnie
Greenock
1816
1822
Woodside, Stuartfield, d.
Gilbert Wardlaw, M.A.
Albion Street, Glasgow
1816
1823
Edinburgh, Blackburn, d.
Alexander Begg
Aberdeen
1816
1820
Fraserburgh, d.
Archibald Jack
Albion Street, Glasgow
1816
1820
Whitehaven, N. Shields, d.
William Swan
Thistle St., Edinburgh
1816
1818
Mongolia, Secretary of
Congregational Union, d.
James Spence
Huntly
1817
1820
Aberdeen, Cork, Newport
(Isle of Wight), d.
George D. CiUlen, M.A.
Albion Street, Glasgow
1817
1822
Leith, d.
David B. Mackenzie
"
1818
1822
Falkirk, Fleetwood, Doune,
Thurso, Elie, d.
J. W. Massie, D.D.
1819
1822
India, Dunfermline, Perth,
London, d.
Alexander NicoU
Edinburgh
1819
Thomas Winslow
Islington, London
1819
Douglas, Isle of Man, d.
James Scott
1819
Peterhead, Demerara, d.
Thomas Wood
Chelsea
1820
1824
John Hamilton
Linlithgow
1820
John Hyndman
Leith
1820
John Arthur
Innerkip
1820
1824
Helensburgh, d.
Edward Campbell
Island of Isla
1820
1825
Glasgow, d.
Daniel M'Keich
Paisley
1820
1829
Campbeltown, d.
John Hill
Kirriemuir
1821
1825
Alva, Kilmarnock, Stafford,
d.
India. Left the Ministry, d.
T. Ross
Huntly
1821
John Smith
Orkney
1821
1825
Canada, d.
Alexander Marshall
Nile Street, Glasgow
1821
1823
Stirling, d.
Eben. Millar
Cambridge
1821
London, Rotterdam, Africa.
Joined the F.C.
1 For an account of the Theological Classes prior to 1811, see p. 100.
256
STUDENTS OF THE THEOLOGICAL HALLS
257
Dnte of
Date of
Remarks.
Name.
Church.
admis-
ordina-
sion.
tion.
d. means deceased.
Robert Machray
Aberdeen
1822
1825
Kirriemuir, Perth, Waltham-
stow, Dumfries, d.
Wm. John Robertson
Falkirk
1822
1825
Malcolm M'Lean
Tiree
1822
1825
Aberfeldy, d.
Archibald M'Ewan
Islay
1822
1827
Rothesay, d.
John Lyall
1822
1824
Blairgowrie, d.
John Greig
Nile Street, Glasgow
182.5
d.
William DouU
Thurso
1825
Thomas Young
Ayr
1825
1830
Garliestown, d.
James Haddow
Nile Street
1825
John Urquhart
Perth
1825
Died while a student.
John M 'Robert
George Street, Glasgow
1825
1828
Ellon, Cambuslang, Den-
holm, d.
Alexander Cuthbert
Dundee
1826
Montrose, Airdrie. Joined
U.P. Church, d.
John Wiseman
George Street, Glasgow
1826
Wick, Arundel. Joined F.C.
W. Legge
Aberdeen
1826
1831
Reading, d.
James Drummond
Dundee
1826
London, Quebec, d.
William Harris
Nile Street, Glasgow
1826
Quilon, India, d.
R. Ferguson, D.D.,
1826
1830
Haddington, Stratford,
LL.D.
Ryde, d.
John M'Laren
Aberfeldy
1827
1836
Aberfeldy, d.
William Lowe
Wick
1828
1831
Banchory, Forfar, Porto-
bello, d.
Thomas Maxwell
Dumfries
1828
Edward Napier
Montrose
1828
1831
Dalkeith, d.
Henry AVilkes, D.D.
Montreal, Canada
1828
1832
Edinburgh, Montreal, d.
Richard Penman
College St., Edinburgh
1828
1832
Arbroath, Beres, Aberdeen,
Chester-le-Street, d.
Archibald Farquharson
Cavers
1829
1835
Tiree, d.
Andrew Russell
Linlithgow
1830
1833
Haddington, Dundee, Stir-
ling, Bradford, d.
Alex. M'Naughton
Nile Street, Glasgow
1830
Glasgow
James Russell
Coleraine
1830
1837
Rendall, Nagercoil, d.
John Robertson
George Street, Aberdeen
1830
Prof, of Eng. Lit., London.
Robert Wilson
Belfast
1830
Denholm, Cockermouth,
Charlesworth, d.
Alexander Fraser, M.A.
Nile Street, Glasgow
1830
1834
Alloa, Blackburn, d.
William Christie
Banfif
1830
G. G. Cunningham
George Street, Glasgow
1830
Chorley
J. Murker, M.A.
Crichie
1831
1833
Banff, d.
A. T. Gowan, D.D.,Prof.
Whitehaven
1831
1836
Blackhills, Dalkeith, d.
Robert Lang, M.A.
George Street, Glasgow
1831
1836
Ayr, Chorley, Portobello,
Dundee
John Mackie
Crichie
1831
Banff, d.
Alexander Campbell
Glasgow
1831
1836
Greenock, d.
John Moir
Perth
1831
1835
Arbroath, Hamilton. Joined
F.C, d.
C. Rattray
L.M.S. student
1831
1834
Demerara, d.
James Cameron
George Street, Glasgow
1832
1837
Dumfries, Portobello, Col-
chester, Hopton, d.
J. R. Campbell, D.D.
Tl M )>
1833
1835
Montrose, Edinburgh, Brad-
ford, d.
D. Blellock
)7 M
1834
Rendall, Boro'fer, d.
W. Lawson Brown, M.A.
Anstruther
1834
1840
Lerwick, Bolton, Lytham,d.
Adam Gordon
1834
Linlithgow. Joined U.P.
Church, d.
T. S. M'Kean
Garliestown
1834
1838
Kirkwall, Tahita. Martyred
R. Weir
1834
1840
Forres, Kilmarnock, d.
258
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
1
Date of Date o
Reraarks.
Name.
Church.
admis- , ordina-
sion. tion.
d. means deceased.
Alexander Munro
Knockando
1834
1837
Banchory, Blackhills. Joined
E.U., d.
J. S. Wardlaw, D.D.
George Street, Glasgow
1834
1841
India ; Professor, d.
John Kennedy, D.D.
Albany St., Edinburgh
1834
1836
Aberdeen, London
Alexander Fraser
Nile Street, Glasgow
1835
1837
Edinburgh, Glasgow, Mel-
bourne, d.
David Webster
Sauchieburn
1835
1840
Campbeltown, Kirkwall,
Linlithgow, d.
Jas. Kennedy, M.A.
Albany St., Edinburgh
1835
1838
L.M.S., Benares, Portobello
J. Elrick
Nile Street, Glasgow
1835
1840
Falkirk, London, Sudbury,
Dudley, d.
J. Kirk, D.D.
Stirling
1835
1S39
Hamilton. Joined E.U., d.
R. Massie
George Street, Glasgow
1835
Peterhead, d.
J. B. Laing
Frederick St., Aberdeen
1835
1839
Woodside. Joined E.U., d.
Archibald Duff, D.D.
Sherbrooke, Canada
1836 1811
Fraserburgh, Liverpool,
Hawick, CowansvUle,
Brome, d.
J. Mann
George Street, Glasgow
1836
1840
Alexandria, Falkirk, Dum-
fries, Birkenhead, d.
T. Just, jun.
Newport-on-Tay
1836
1841
Newport, Charmouth, d.
Alex. Gordon, LL.D.
Rhynie
1836
1841
Londonderry, Walsall, Ley-
ton, d.
Denholm. Left ministry.
John Spence
George Street, Glasgow
1836
J. M'Farlaue
Nile Street, Glasgow
1836
Died while a student.
D. Russell, D.D.
Ward Church, Dundee
1837
1839
Eglinton Street, Glasgow, d.
G. S. Ingram
Montrose
1837
1842
Alloa, Hanover St. , Glasgow,
Richmond, d.
R. Simpson
George Street, Glasgow
1837
1841
Glasgow, d.
David Connel
Nile Street, Glasgow
1837
Canada
W. Reid
Stirling
1837
Joined the F.C.
John Smith
Duncanstone
1837
1841
Ayr ; Editor, d.
Ker Johnston
Greenock
1837
Perth. Joined the Baptist
D. M'Eachran
Islay
1837
Died while a student
Daniel Fraser, D.D.
Nile Street, Glasgow
1838
1843
Airedale College
W. M'Nab
George Street, Glasgow
1838
Falkirk, America
W. C. Stallybrass
L.M.S. student
1838
Brixton
D. G. Watt, M.A.
,, „ Irvine
1838
1840
India, Northwich, Maid-
stone, London, d.
W. Glen
)) >)
1838
India, d.
W. Letham
,, ,j
1838
Died while a student
James Sime
Albion Street, Glasgow
1838
1840
Airdrie, Cumnock, Wick,
Fraserburgh, Thurso, d.
J. Miller
1838
1842
Inverurie, Blairgowrie, d.
T. Reekie
L.M.S. student
1838
Dundee, Alexandria, Eng.
Hugh Smith
Kilmarnock
1838
Brechin, Glasgow, d.
N. Galloway
Blackburn
1839
1844
Forres. Joined the E.U., d.
T. Lightbody
Nile Street, Glasgow
1839
Campbeltown, Canada, d.
Lewis Fullarton
Ardrossan
1839
Hugh Hercus
Greenock
1839
1844
Montrose, Woolwich, d.
P. W. Grant
Perth
1839
1844
Cumnock. Joined Baptists
W. Inglis
L.M.S. student
1839
South Africa
John Hunter
Alloa
1839
Ayr, America
D. M'Lachlan
Montrose
1840
Barrister
William Bathgate, D.D.
Denholm
1840
1844
Forres, Kilmarnock. Joined
theE.U., d.
A. Gillies
Kilsyth
1839
1844
Arbroath, d.
T. Lessel
1840
1843
Calcutta, d.
William Eyval
Huntly
1840
Joined F.C.
R. Caldwell, D.D.
1840
Madras. Entered the Ch. of
Engl., became Bishop, d.
STUDENTS OFiH'HE THEOLOGICAL HALLS
259
Date of
Date of
Remarks.
Name.
Church.
admis-
ordina-
tion.
d. means deceased.
A. Duncanson
Brown Street, Glasgow
1840
Falkirk. Joined E.U.
J. Stronach
1840
1842
Singapore, China, d.
W. P. Lyon
1840
1842
India, Tunbridge Wells, d.
James M'Farlane
Leven
1840
1842
Wick, Whitehaven, Wind-
sor, Holmfirth, d.
James Fingland
George Street, Glasgow
1840
Died while a student
G. G. Geikie
1840
Canada
Eb. Kennedy
Argyle Sq., Edinburgh
1840
1844
Leith. Joined the E.U., d.
Eb. Young
Denholm
1840
1842
Annan, d.
A. S. Muir
Paisley
1840
1845
Laurencekirk, America,
Joined the F.C., d.
G. Greig
George Street, Glasgow
1840
1845
Falkland, d.
Alex. Hannay, D.D.
Dumfries
1841
1846
Dundee, London : Secy, of
Cong. Union of England
and AVales, d.
Alex. C. Wood
Roxburgh Place, Edin-
burgh
1841
1843
Montrose, Peterhead,
Hames. Joined E.U., d.
Janaes Robertson
Roxburgh Place, Edin-
burgh
1841
1843
Alloa, Galashiels, Sec.
Yorkshire Cong. Union.
James Howie
Leith
1841
Nairn, Australia
J. V. S. Taylor
L.M.S. student
1841
India
G. M 'Galium
Campbeltown
1841
1846
Dewsbury. Joined E.U., ci.
T. Wood
1841
Morpeth
W. Ross
Nairn
1841
1846
Paisley, d.
J. Samson
Alexandria
1841
1845
Sheerness. Joined E.U.
David Cook
St. Andrews
1842
1845
Peterhead, Dundee, Glas-
gow. Joined U.P. Ch., d.
J. Shedlock
Reading
1842
1847
Merton, Boulogne, London
J. Carruthers
Greenock
1842
America
James M. Russell
George St., Glasgow
1842
Died while a student
A. Denholra
Airdrie
1842
David Scott
Falkland
1842
A. Walker
Alloa
1842
D. Ferguson
Hamilton
1843
Joined E.U.
F. Ferguson, M.A.,D.D.
"
1843
1845
Joined E.U. Glasgow,
Montrose St., d.
W. Dobson
1844
1848
Innerleithen, d.
J. Menzies
Dunfermline
1844
Airdrie
John Low
Blackhills
1844
1847
Perth
C. Whyte
Oban
1844
1847
Appin, Oban, d.
R. Harvey
George St., Aberdeen
1845
1848
Peterhead, Harray, d.
J. F. Glass _
1846
1850
Islesworth, Sunningdale, d.
James Robbie
Forfar
1846
1849
Kirkcaldy, Fraserburgh,
Dunfermline. Professor, d.
D. Galbraith
Islay
1846
1849
Campbeltown. Joined F. C.
W. Wilson
Nairn
1846
1849
Linlithgow, Falkirk,
Australia
P. Whyte
George St., Glasgow
1847
1850
Duncanston, Montrose,
Sheffield
Angus Galbraith
Campbeltown
1848
1852
Stuartfield (twice), Leith,
Whitehaven, Brighouse
J. Maconochie
George St., Aberdeen
1846
1851
Ayr
J. Pillans
Annan
1847
1851
Perth, Camberwell,
Huntly, d.
Andrew Noble
1848
1852
Laurencekirk, d.
Alexander Sime
Blackfriars St., Aberd'n
1848
W. Ingram
Argyle Sq. , Edinburgh
1848
18.53
Nairn, Musselburgh
G. D. M'Gregor '
Montrose
1848
1853
Portobello Farnworth,
London,, d.
260
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Date of
Date of
Name.
Church.
admis-
ordiua-
siou.
tioa.
D. Torrance
Paisley
1848
G. S. JMorrison
Duncanstone
1848
Alex. M'Auslane, D.D.
Perth
1849
1852
J. Thomson
Annan
1849
1853
A. (iillespie
George St., Glasgow
1849
J. M'Naughton
Nicholson St., Glasgow
18.50
1853
J. Hutchison
George St., Glasgow
1850
1852
A. Guthrie
Coleraine
1850
1854
J. C. M'Intosh
Millseat
1850
1854
John M'Auslane
Perth
1850
1854
John Currie
Portobello
1852
1856
A. Gosman, Prof.
George St., Glasgow
1852
1855
A. AVilliamson, LL.D.
Linlithgow
1852
1854
J. Sinclair
Argyle Sq., Edinburgh
1852
J. Innes
Huntly
1852
1854
George Saunders
Peterhead
1853
1856
E. H. Smith, M.A.
Ehynie
18.53
1855
J. Campbell
George St., Glasgow
1853
1855
W. J. Cox, D.D.
Annan
1853
18.55
T. Brisbane
Nicholson St., Glasgow
1853
1856
John A. Anderson
Ehynie
1854
1858
J. R. Ferguson
George St., Glasgow
1854
1858
D. H. Philip
Portsoy
1853
1858
W. Nicholson, Ph.D.,
Leith
1854
1859
M.A.
J. Douglas
Portobello
18.55
1859
D. M'Corkindale
Richmond, Edinburgh
1856
18.59
J. Blacklock
Stuartfield
1856
1860
F. S. Johnstone
Edinburgh
1856
1861
Jas. Eoss
Elgin
1857
1862
T. Neave
Ward Chapel, Dundee
1857
1862
P. Barr
N. Hanover St., Glas.
1857
1864
A. H. Lowe
Edinburgh
1857
1861
W. M'Lellan
N. Hanover St., Glas.
1857
1862
D. Johnstone
)) 99
1857
1861
W. Goldie
Elgin
1858
1862
Hugh Elder
Dunfermline
1858
1868
R. H. Irvine
Musselburgh
1858
1862
J. Whitton
Castle Street, Dundee
1859
1875
Matthew Simpson
Leith
1859
1863
J. Stott, M.A.
Edinburgh
1860
1864
H. Williamson
L.M.S. Student
1860
1863
James Stark, D.D.
North Hanover Street,
Glasgow
1860
1864
Remarks.
d. means deceased.
Died while a student
Berwick, Australia, d.
Dunfermline, London, d.
Aberdeen, Lightcliffe, d.
Kirkwall, d.
Elie, Dunfermline, Ashton-
under-Lyne, d.
Elgin, Retford, Moorgreen.
St. Andrews, Kilmarnock,
South Africa, d.
Cumnock, Stretford, Gar-
liestown, d.
Wick, St. Andrews, Dem-
erara, Scalloway
Haddington, Melbourne
China. Joined U. P. Ch.,d
Leven. Became journalist.
Wick, Pontefract, Wibsey,
d.
Millseat, Woodside, d.
Dundee, Peterhead, Car-
lisle, Duncanstone
Kilmarnock, d.
Edinburgh, Leith, Dundee
Duncanstone, Cumnock,
Cambuslang
Kilsyth, d.
Stirling, Adelaide
Avoch, d.
Amble, St. Petersburg
[Cong. Union, d.
Alexandria, Glasgow, Sec.
Harray, Forfar
Sannox, Oban. Joined
F.C., d.
Forfar, Merthyr, Wolver-
hampton. Joined Eng.
Pres. Ch., d.
Linlithgow, Stirling, Cal-
cutta, Montrose, Glas-
gow
Perth, Beaminster, Dor-
chester, Invercargill, N.Z.
Truro (S. Australia), d.
Kilmarnock, Preston
Haddington, Wick, Salford,
Stirling. Joined F.C.
Musselburgh, Dundee, d.
Airdrie, Grantham, d.
Salem, Rochester, Farm-
ington, U.S.A., Forres
Dundee, Sheffield
Summit (Rochdale), Wigan
Musselburgh, d.
St. Andrews, Blackburn, d.
Jamaica, d.
Elgin, Edinburgh, Aber-
deen
STUDENTS OF THE THEOLOGICAL HALLS
261
Date of
Date of
Remarks.
Name.
Church.
admis-
ordiua-
sion
tiou.
d. means decea.sed.
J. Lemon
George St., Aberdeen
1860
1864
Linlithgow, Belper, Jersey,
Leicester. Joined Eng.
Pres. Church, Felton
John Philip
Albion St., Aberdeen
1860
d.
J. Williamson
L.M.S. Student
1860
1863
Killed in China
A. F. Simpson, M.A.,
Fraserburgh
1861
1866
Duncanstone, St. Peters-
Prof.
burg, Dalkeith ; Prof.
George Moir
Ward, Dundee
1859
1865
Letham
James Sime
Thurso
1861
1865
Hamilton. Left ministry
J. Johnston
Stirling
1861
1862
New Pitsligo, Cambuslang,
London
Canton, Elgin, London.
James Anderson
St. Andrews
1861
1865
Entered Establishment.
d.
South Africa, Port Eliza-
W. Dower
Dee Street, Aberdeen
1861
1865
beth
D. Duncan, LL.D.
Mill seat
1861
Madras Education Depart.
G.M 'Hardy, M.A., D.D.
Lindsaj' St., Dundee
1862
1865
New Lanark, Kirkcaldy
J. Wallace
North Hanover Street,
Glasgow
1863
1866
Perth, Dundee, d.
James Philip *
Montrose
1863
Died while a student
W. Milne
Inverurie
1863
1866
Helensburgh, Inverness, d.
J. E. Dobson
Innerleithen
1864
1867
Lerwick, Blairgowrie,
Gainsborough. Joined
U.P. Ch.
W. Whyte
Augustine, Edinburgh
1864
1866
Madras, d.
Alexander Legge
BanfiE
1865
Peterhead, Preston. En-
tered Establishment
J. AVemyss, M.A.
Albany St., Edinburgh
1863
1866
Fraserburgh, Edinburgh
D. Gass
Annan
1865
1866
New Pitsligo, Bruton
William Home
Dunfermline
1866
1877
Dundee. Entered Estab-
lished Church, d.
JohnFordyce.M. A., D.D.
Stuartfield
1866
1870
Portobello, Grimsby, Bel-
fast, Sydney
James Barton Bell
Augustine, Edinburgh
1866
1870
Aberfeldy, Aberdeen,
Ulverston
George Campbell
Wardlaw, Glasgow
1867
1869
Dundee, Sydney
D. E. Irons, M.A.,B.D.
Perth and Augustine,
Edinburgh
1867
1871
Glasgow, Ripon, Glasgow
R. Auchterlonie
Eglinton St., Glasgow
1867
1869
New Pitsligo, Portobello,
Edinburgh
John Park
Hamilton
1867
1870
Dumfries, Stroud, Wands-
worth
Archibald Prentice
Ewing Place, Glasgow
1867
1870
Walls, Thurso. Parish
Min., New Craighall
James Paissell
Falkirk
1867
Died while a student
William Dargie, M.A.
Belmont Ch., Aberdeen
1867
1872
Alexandria, Lowick, E.G.
of Scotland, d.
Robert Dey
Inverurie
1867
1871
Nairn, Glasgow, Sydney
A. B. Roebuck
Eglinton St., Glasgow
1868
Died while a student.
Robert Hutchison
Lindsay St., Dundee
1868
1870
Cambuslang. Joined E.C.
James Edwards, M.A.,
Belmont, Aberdeen
1868
1872
Hamburg, Rhynie, Insch,
B.D.
Govan
John Murray
Portsoy
1869
Joined Baptists
John M'Rae Simcock
Perth
1869
1871
Paisley, Canada
John Wright
Dumfries
1870
1873
Inverness. Left ministry, d.
George Mackie
Eglinton St., Glasgow
1870
Joined Establishment, d.
Wm. D. Dey,M.A.,B.D.
Belmont, Aberdeen
1870
1875
Newcastle. Entered E.C.
Alexander Thomson
1
Fraserburgh
1870
1877
Br. Guiana, Assam, d.
262
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Robert Allan
James Buchan, M.A.
W. Metcalf, D.D.
Andrew M. Ellis
James Bell
William Lowe Walker
Alexander I. Pirie
David Beaton, D.D.
John S. Miller
Alex. Whyte
William Matheson
Charles AVhyte, M.A.
Jonathan Koebuck
John P. Tulloch
E. M. Tennant
William Hill Philip
William Anderson
William A. Farquhar
Thomas D. Anderson,
M.A., D.Sc.
James Ray, M.A.
Ale.xander Gray
Donald Swaiison
Alexander Francis
A. R. Milne, M.A.
John Petrie Wilson
W. Hope Davison, M.A.
John Park Noble
Andrew Noble Scott
John D. Hardie, M.A.
James F. M'Hardy
William M. Reid
William D. Mackenzie,
M.A., D.D., Prof.
William Cran, B.D.
Alexander Sutherland
David K. Fisher
W. H. Muncaster, B.D.
William J. Thornton
John Blair
Robert W. Hay
R. M. Cairney
W. F. Singer
Matthew P. Noble
Donald M'Kinnon
Alexander Mann
A. R. Henderson, M.A.
Church.
Albany St., Edinburgh
Fraserburgh
Belmont, Aberdeen
Annan
Richmond PL , Edin.
Albion St., Aberdeen
)» J)
Airdrie
Montrose
Albion Ch., Aberdeen
N. City Road, Glasgow
Egliuton St., Gla.sgow
Ewing Place, Glasgow
Albany St., Edinburgh
Dairy, Edinburgh
Albion St., Aberdeen
Augustine, Edinburgh
Paisley
East End, Greenock
Leith
Dairy, Edinburgh
Inverurie
Trinity, Glasgow
East Ch., Greenock
Montrose
Hope Park, Edinburgh
St. Andrews
Augustine, Edinburgh
Portobello
Rhynie and Belmont,
Aberdeen
Hope Park, Edinburgh
Montrose
Albany St., Edinburgh
Dunfermline
Albany St., Edinburgh
Elgin Place, Glasgow
Albion St., Aberdeen
Dairy, Edinburgh
Avocli
Millseat
Date of
Date o£
admis-
ordina-
sion.
tiou.
1871
1875
1871
1874
1871
1871
1875
1872
1873
1872
1873
1872
1876
1872
1876
1873
1878
1873
1878
1873
1878
1873
1876
1873
1874
1876
1875
1877
1875
1880
1875
1878
1876
1876
1880
1876
1882
1876
1876
1880
1877
1879
1877
1880
1877
1882
1877
1881
1877
1882
1878
1883
1879
1881
1879
1884
1880
1882
1880
1880
1884
1880
1885
1881
1882
1881
1883
1881
1886
1881
1881
1887
1881
1885
1881
1886
1882
1886
1882
1886
1882
1888
Remarks.
d. means deceased.
Tockleholes, Newport,
Marple
Airdrie, Sydney, N.S.W.
Ayr. Joined B.C.
Teacher
Crieff, Aberdeen, Hull,
Glasgow
Haddington, Thurso, Haw-
ick, Glasgow, Laurence-
kirk
Kirkwall. Joined U. P. Ch.
Coatbridge, Chicago
Scalloway, Oldham
Rendall. Joined F.C.
Stuartfield, Cumnock
Nairn, Newcastle, N.S.W.
Stirling, Dundee, Bristol
Teacher, Shetland
Alexandria, Blairgowrie
Harra3^ Joined F.C.
Imlay City, Michigan
Lerwick, Laurencekirk, d.
Left ministry
Joined Establishment
Peterhead. Joined F.C.
Left ministry
Millseat, St. Petersburg
Arbroath, Wellington, d.
Inverurie, Blackburn
Glasgow, Portobello. Sec.
Congl. Union
Dundee, Bradford. Joined
Pres. Church of Eng.
Cumnock, Edinburgh,
Sullom, Rutherglen
Port-Errol, Inverurie.
Left ministry.
Banff, Crieff. Joined F.C.
Stuartfield. Joined F.C.
Montrose, Morningside,
Chicago
Tutor, Wesleyan Seminary,
Antigua
Garliestown, Katoomba
Sullom, Port Chalmers.
Joined Presbyterians.
Aberfeldy, Stirling, Bec-
cles, West Bromwich
Overuewton, Nairn, d.
Kirkwall, Coatbridge
Joined Baptists
Garliestown, Aberdeen
Rhynie, d.
Macduff, Kilsyth
Glasgow. Joined E.C.
Innerleithen, Oban, Airdrie
Greenock, Montrose, Edin-
burgh
STUDENTS OF THE THEOLOGICAL HALLS
263
1
Date of
Date oi
Remarks.
Name.
Church.
admis-
ordina-
sion.
tion.
d. means deceased.
William Murray
Laurencekirk
1883
1890
Millseat
Thos. Templeton, M.A.
Albany St., Edinburgh
1883
1887
New Pitsligo, Huntly,
Dundee
David Caird
Belmont St., Aberdeen
1885
1888
Perth, Dundee, Edinburgh
A. H. Cullen
Springhill College
1885
1887
Gloucester, Manchester
"William Blair
Elgin Place, Glasgow
1885
1889
Stirling, Helensburgh
Charles Brown, M.A,
i> J?
1885
1893
Dundee, Perth. W.A., d.
George M'Kellar, M.D.,
Hope Park, Edinburgh
1885
Joined Medical Profession.
CM., D.P.H.
R. C. Hutton
Albany St., Edinburgh
1885
1888
Rothbury, Australia, d.
J. K. Eodie
Hope Park, Edinburgh
1885
Preacher, d.
James Wylie
Eglinton St., Glasgow
1886
1888
Inverurie, Arbroath, Belfast
Thomas Kerr
Augustine, Edinburgh
1887
1889
Avoch
William Kae
Walkerburn
1887
1890
Inverurie, d.
James Provan
Eglinton St., Glasgow
1887
1888
Stuartfield, Lowell, U.S.A.
James Johnston
Airdrie
1887
1892
Walkerburn
M. F. M. Peterson, M.A.
Reawick
1887
1893
Bowdon, Leicester, Not-
tingham
Robert M'Kinlay, M.A.
Stirling
1888
1891
New Pitsligo
Magnus Sinclair
Sandwick
1888
1893
Reawick
David Farquharson
Elgin Place, Glasgow
1888
1893
Musselburgh
Adam Drummond
Cumnock
1889
1891
Port-Errol, Macduff
David J. Graham
Coatbridge
1891
1893
Aberfeldy
J. Shaw Brown
Elgin Place, Glasgow
1891
1894
Glasgow
F. J. Japp
Montrose
1890
1895
Aberdeen, Nairn
Alex. M'Lennan, M.A.
Avoch
1890
1895
Wick, Dunfermline
H. Jenkins, M.A.
Gt. Hamilton St., Glas-
1890
1896
Edinburgh, Leith
Alex. Sivewright, M.A.
Huntly [gow
1892
1896
Dunfermline, St. Andrews
H. E. Wareham
Augustine
1892
G. R. Turner
Lewisham, S.E.
1892
J. J. Macnair
Elgin Place, Glasgow
1894
1898
Jammulamadugu
Wm. J. Collier, M.A.
Lerwick
1892
1896
Glasgow, Huntly
J. D. M'CulIoch
Wardlaw, Glasgow
1892
1898
Glasgow, Galston
A. Kirk, B.A.
Straide
1892
1898
Duncanstoue, Kilwinning
D. M'Intosh
Trinity, Edinburgh
1893
1895
Port-Errol
J. B. Allan, M.A., B.D.
Dunfermline
1892
1897
Aberdeen
E. H. Lewis
Morningside
1893
Bellary, S. India
P. S. Brown
Harray
1894
1898
Foula
EVANGELICAL UNION THEOLOGICAL HALL, 1843-96.
Robert Hunter
Galashiels
1843
1846
Catrine, Kilwinning, For-
res, Leith
Alexander M. Wilson
Kilmarnock
1843
1846
Paisley, Dundee, Airdrie,
Carlisle, Bathgate, d.
Henry Melville
Falkirk
1843
1848
Vermont, U.S.A., Toronto,
d.
Galston, d. 1849
James M'Millan
Kilmarnock
1843
1849
William Landells, D.D.
1843
Joined Baptists
George Young
Melrose
1843
Wigton, Cumberland, An-
nan. Joined Indepen-
dents
David Drummond
Methodist, Kilmarnock
1843
1846
Airdrie, BeUshill, Shotts, d.
James Guthrie
Kilmarnock
1843
Alexander Forsyth
1844
Health failed, and left
ministry
264
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Date of
Date of
Remarks.
Name.
Church.
admis-
ordina-
sion.
tiou.
d. means deceased.
Fergus Ferguson, M.A.,
Hamilton
1844
1845
Glasgow
D.D.
David Ferguson
1844
Returned to business
Gilbert M 'Galium
1844
1848
Falkirk, Dewsbury, d.
Alexauder C. Wood
1844
Montrose, England
James Robertson
1844
Galashiels, Hamilton,etc.,c?.
"William Garvie
Avonbridge
1844
Schoolmaster, d.
John Hunter
Kelso
1844
Died while a student
Hugh Templeton
Dunfermline
1844
1849
Bonnyrigg
William M'Whirter
Kilmarnock
1844
Went into business
James Harvie
,,
1845
1848
Galashiels, America, d.
John Hamilton
Preston
1845
Became editor of Ayles-
bury News.
Hugh Riddell
Ireland
1845
1847
Bellshill, Dundee, Glas-
gow, d.
Alexander Cross
1845
1846
Ardrossan, d.
James Frame
Hamilton
1845
1848
Hoxham, London, New-
burgh, Selkirk,.(Z.
James Marshall
Dunfermline
1845
Alexander Davidson
Kirkoswald
1845
1849
Fraserburgh, Barrhead,
Glasgow, Greenock, Leith,
d.
Robert Traill
1845
Ebenezer Syme
1845
Henry Anderson
1845
John Aitken
1845
Alexander Dewar
Crathie
1845
William Bremner
1845
John Hart
1845
1846
Hamilton
Robert Menzies
1845
George Alexander Syme
1845
John Inglis
Alexandria
1845
1849
Lanark, Bellshill, Coat-
bridge, Dalbeattie
Duncan M'Kenzie
1845
David Syme
1S45
James Cochrane
1846
William Taylor, D.D.,
Kilmarnock
1846
1849
Kendal, Windermere,
Prof.
Edinburgh
William Hudspith
1846
Robert Anderson
1846
1850
Shotts, Glasgow, d.
John Turnbull
1846
William Laing
Edinburgh
1846
William Crombie
Skene
1846
1850
Melrose, d.
George Wisely
Skene
1846
1850
Strathmiglo, Bellshill,
Westhills
Jedburgh, d.
John Traill 1
Montrose
1846
1849
Matthew !SIacfie
Greenock
1846
James Lang
1846
Edward Reed
1846
Died same year
John Pattison
1846
George Anderson
Kelso
1847
America, d.
William Hutchison
Alexandria
1847
1851
Jedburgh, d.
George D. Crombie
1847
Alexander Somerville
Lesmahagow
1847
James Shaw Lang
Dumbarton
1847
George Smith Lang
Dumbarton
1847
Thomas Orr
1847
1851
Windsor, c^.
Joseph Boj'le
Aberdeen
1847
1851
Aj'r, Leith, London
Samuel Chisholm
Dalkeith
1847
Glasgow, Huddersfield
STUDENTS OF THE THEOLOGICAL HALLS
265
Date of
Date of
Remarks.
Name.
Church.
admis-
ordina-
tion.
d. means deceased.
Robert Steel
Saltcoats
1847
1851
Dairy, Dalmellington,
Galston
William Clark
1847
Thomas Elder
West Calder
1847
Thomas Cockburn
1847
Henry A. Mitchell
Leslie
1847
William Paton
Galston
1847
1851
Wednesbury, England
James Maconachie
Aberdeen
1848
1851
Galston, Lanark, Hamil-
ton, Dumfries, d.
Andrew B. Munroe
Aberdeen
1848
John Kirkland
Kilmarnock
1848
William Maxton
Cupar-Fife
1848
Eobert Wallace
Old Deer
1849
1852
Coupar-Angus, Glasgow, d.
Edwin Palmer
London
1849
William Anderson
Skene
1849
John Andrew
Ochiltree
1849
1853
Barrhead, Tillicoultry,
Dundee. Joined Catholic
Apostolic Church
John Y. Aitchison
Greenlaw
1849
Joined Baptists
William Eobertson
Dundee
1850
William Fiulay Main
Edinburgh
1850
Left owing to failing
health
John Whitson
Roslin
1850
1854
Montrose, Carlisle, Shotts,
Beith, Anstruther
James Christie
Strathaven
1850
M.D., Glasgow, d.
Archibald Gray
Cambusuethan Par.
1850
Joined Baptists, London
James Pearson
Haydon Bridge Par.
1850
John Cameron
Glasgow
1851
Wm. Banks M 'William
London
1851
Altrincham, etc.
William M'Owan
Comrie
1851
d.
Archibald Bleloch
Clackmannan Par.
1851
d.
James Gordon
Milnathort
1851
d.
Robert George Harper
Belfast
1851
Glasgow, etc.
George T. ]\I. Inglis
Traquair
1852
1856
Edinburgh
George Cron
Thornhill
1852
1856
Belfast, d.
James Allan
Lochwinnoch
1852
Robert J. Gray
Wishaw
1853
1857
Wishaw, Thornhill, Gal-
James Wilson
Dollar
1853
[stou, d.
James Virtvie
Polwarth
1853
Joined C.U.
Alexander French
Glasgow
1853
Dalkeith, etc., d.
Robert Mitchell
Dumbarton
1853
1857
Hawick, Glasgow, Man-
chester, Greenock, d.
George Smith
Kilmarnock
1853
Robert D. i\litchell
Fife
1854
1858
Ayr, Thornhill, Dalkeith
David Hislop, B.A.
Glasgow
1855
18.58
Montrose, Leith, Hawick
Hugh Stewart
Irvine
1858
Anstruther. Joined Catho-
lic Apostolic Church
William Adamson,
New Galloway
1855
Perth, Edinburgh, AVinder-
D.D.
mere
William M'llven
Catrine
1855
Died when a student
James M'Lellan
Closeburn
1855
Died when a student
John A. Eraser
Berbice
1856
Alexander Soutar
Coupar-Angus
1856
Thomas Lovekin
Cork
1856
Thomas Suttie
Dunshalt
1856
1860
Galston, ret. to bitsiness
Alexander Brown
Ayr
1857
1861
Galashiels, Aberdeen
William Ross
Lossiemouth
1857
1861
Dundee, d.
William F. Edmond
Leith
1857
Died when a student
A. M. Fairbairn, M.A.,
Edinburgh
1857
1861
Bathgate, Aberdeen, Prin-
D.D., LL.D.
cipal Mansfield College
266
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
D&te of
Date of
Remarks.
Name.
Church.
admia-
ordina-
tion.
d. means deceased.
James Strachan
Leith
1857
1861
Auchterarder, Tillicoultry,
d.
Dundee, Carluke, Forres, d.
John Miller
Rutherglen
1857
William Park
Liverpool
1857
1861
Paisley, Windermere, Croy-
don
William Thornton
Staveley
1858
John Peill
,,
1858
1862
Wick, England
John Anderson
Glassford
1858
Joined C.U.
John M'Naughton
Carnwath
1858
William Dunlop
Kilmarnock
1859
1863
Dalkeith, Edinburgh, Glas-
James Cron
Durrisdeer
1859
1864
gow
Langholm, d.
Thomas Robinson
Blennerhasset
1859
d.
William Halliday
Polwarth
1859
1862
Wishaw, Glasgow
James Foote
Muckhart
1859
1863
Catrine, Coatbridge, Dun-
fermline
George Peill
Staveley
1859
1863
Jedburgh, Stewarton, d.
Daniel Jackson
"
1859
1863
Joined C.U. Ayr, Hamil-
ton, Australia
Robert Hood
Newmilns
1859
1862
Glasgow, d.
David B. Morris
Auchterarder
1860
Hong-Kong. Joined Ch.
of England
James Davidson
Aberdeen
1860
1863
Lanark, Tillicoultry
John Dunlop
Galston
1860
Dumfries, Sec. of Jewish
Evangelising Society
Robert Martin
Edinburgh
1861
Editor, d.
Robert Paterson
Rutherglen
1861
1864
Dreghorn, Edinburgh,
Montrose, Belfast,
Govan, Blantyre
George Gladstone
Edinburgh
1861
1864
Sanquhar, Govan, Glas-
gow. Secretary E.U.
Alexander Nairn
Glasgow
1861
1864
Thornhill, Tillicoultry,
Stirling, Whitehaven
John Geddes
Bathgate
1861
1865
Barrhead, d.
Robert Finlay
Galashiels
1861
1864
Eyemouth, Perth
William M'Cammon
Kilmarnock
1861
d.
Alexander Stewart,
Coujiar-Angus
1861
1864
Aberdeen
M.D., LL.D,
James Gunn
Wick
1861
1865
Carluke, St. Neots, etc.
Gilbert Paterson
Glasgow
1861
1865
Wick, Arbroath, Carluke
Hugh Lawson, M.A.
Edinburgh
1861
1865
Ryton, Newcastle, Bury, d.
Robert Hislop
Stane Shotts
1861
1864
Kilmarnock, Glasgow
James Gray
Glasgow
Alexander Wilson
Cavers Parish
1861
1865
Hamilton, Kilwinning,
Paisley
John Spaven
Musselburgh
1862
1866
Paisley, Windermere, Fal-
kirk, d.
Lachlan T. M'Lean
Tarbert
1862
Joined Ch. of Scotland
William M'Kay
Airdrie
1862
Do. Do.
Angus M'Phee
Glasgow
1862
Picton, N.S., etc.
James M. Campbell
Strathblane
1862
1866
Langholm, America
Archibald Cree
Saltcoats
1862
1866
Joined C. U. Innerleithen,
England
John Cameron
Kilmarnock
1862
1865
Dundee, Hamilton, Fraser-
burgh, Rhynie, Dalbeat-
tie, Linlithgow
James Irving
Annan
1862
1866
Tunbridge, London
Robert Brown
Irvine
1862
d.
Arthur Massey
Glasgow
1862
STUDENTS OF THE THEOLOGICAL HALLS
267
Date of
Date of
Remarks.
Name.
Church.
admis-
ordina-
tion.
d. means deceased.
Eobert Craig, M.A.,
Kilmarnock
1862
1866
Glasgow, Manchester,
D.D.
Edinburgh
Alexander Gray
Glasgow
1862
Settle, etc.
William Williamson
Thornhill
1863
James Kirk
Edinburgh
1863
1867
Belfast, d.
Andrew B. Morris
Dunning Parish
1863
Alexander M'Phee
Glasgow
1863
James Wiseman
New Byth
1863
d.
Peter M'Nish
Saltcoats
1863
1867
Avonbridge, Dundee,
Wishaw, d.
William Thornbeck
Kendal
1863
Barrow, etc.
James C. Bathgate,
Galashiels
1863
Retired from ministry
M.A.
William Eeid
Kelso
1863
Brechin. Joined Catholic
Apostolic
David Drummond
Galston
1863
Stane, Bellshill, etc., d.
Neil Carmichael
Glasgow
1864
M.D., Glasgow
James A. Gray-
Slamannan
1864
Joined Free Church
James Howie
Galashiels
1865
M.D., Liverpool, d.
Thomas G. Salmon
Shapinsa}'
1865
Teacher
James Muir
Stevenston
1865
Joined E.G.
Thomas Hogarth
Caverton Mill
1865
Joined Catholic Apostolic
Church
Robert Martin
Mornington
1865
1869
Westhill, d.
John Adam, M.A.
Echt
1865
1869
Dunfermline, Glasgow,
Carlisle, Edinburgh
John Morton
Carmunnock
1865
1869
Dalkeith, Falkirk, Canada
David Greenhill
Edinburgh
1865
1869
Catrine, Motherwell, Salt-
coats
Ai'chibald Goldie
Anstruther
1865
James Hamilton
Edinburgh
1866
1870
Retired from ministry
Adam Scott
"
1866
1870
Ayr, Carluke, Airdrie, Lan-
aster, Sale, Southport
Robert Wallace
Kilmarnock
1866
Died when a student
Ebenezer C. Leal
Forres
1866
1870
Glasgow. Joined Catholic
Apostolic Church
Robert Brown
Edinburgh
1867
1871
Dalmellington, Jedburgh,
Larkhall, Rutherglen,
Wick
George Bell, M.A.
Galashiels
1868
1871
Sanquhar, Falkirk, Hamil-
ton
Dundee
William Hamilton, M.A.
Kilmarnock
1868
1871
William Wyllie, M.A.
"
1868
1872
Eyemouth, Blantyre, Kirk-
caldy
Alexander Denholm
Edinburgh
1868
1871
Belfast, Hamilton, Govan,
Kilmarnock, Dundee
Alexander Cossar
"
1868
1871
Brechin, Shotts, Port-
Glasgow
James Paterson
Carmyle
1868
1872
Anstruther, Dumbarton,
Kendal. Newcastle
James Monie
Denny
1868
1871
Friockheim, Airdrie, Dun-
dee, Dumbarton, New-
burgh
William Arnott
Dunfermline
1868
1872
Lanark, Glasgow
Matthew Dick
Kilsyth
1868
1872
Australia, d.
Daniel Craig
Saltcoats
1868
1872
Hamilton, d.
Robert Snowdown
Alloa
1868
1872
Bellshill, Arbroath, Lon-
don, d.
Thomas D. Hogg
Galashiels
1868
1872
Dalbeattie, d.
268
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Date of
Date of
Remarks.
Name.
Church.
admis-
ordina-
sion.
tion.
d. means deceased.
James R. Henderson
Glasgow
1869
Died while a student
John M'lldowie
Perth
1869
1873
Ayr, Bristol, d.
Alexander M 'Nair, M. A.
Tillicoultry
1869
1873
Barrhead, Leith, Kilmar-
nock
E. J. E. Boon
Wemyss
1869
1870
Kirkcaldy, Govan
Robert Borland
Stonehouse
1870
1874
Langholm, Kilmarnock.
Joined E.G.
Richard Goodwillie
Strathmiglo
1870
Stonehouse, Coatbridge,
Joined E.G.
William Paterson
Carmyle
1871
Bristol, Newcastleton,
London, Forfar
John Williamson
Sanquhar
1872
Joined E. C.
James S. Brown
Edinburgh
1872
1876
Coupar-Angus, d.
W. F. Adamson, M.A.
Glasgow
1872
1876
Ayr, Galashiels
Robert Bell
Langholm
1872
Died while a student
George Blair
Dalkeith
1873
1876
Sanquhar. Joined E.G.
George Peebles
Edinburgh
1873
1876
Dreghorn, Coatbridge,
America
Alexander Stewart,
M.A., B.D.
Glasgow
1873
1876
Ayr. Joined U.P. Church
John Sloan
Dalmellington
1873
1876
Kilmarnock, Dalbeattie,
Crieff. Join. Unitarians
John Mackintosh
Forres
1873
1876
Edinburgh, Darvel, Mother-
well
William F. Bridge
Glasgow
1874
Died while a student
Archibald Bowman
Dunfermline
1874
1879
Beith, d.
R. W. Jackson
Galashiels
1874
1878
Bellshill, Falkirk. Joined
E.C.
William Tipladj-,
Gainford
1874
1878
Shapinsay. Joined Medical
L.R.C.P.E.
profession
Thomas Stott
Kirkconnel
1874
Died while a student
John Kirk
Edinburgh
1873
1875
Edinburgh
Thomas N. Bowman,
Gainford
1874
1878
Uddingston, Greenock,
Ph.D.
Liverpool
William R. Scott
Kilmarnock
1875
1879
Langholm, Greenock.
Joined E.C.
Oliver Dryer
Edinburgh
1875
1879
Sanquhar, Airdrie. Joined
U.P. Church
John D. Brown
Anstruther
1875
1879
Selkirk, d.
Alexander Baxter
Glasgow
1875
Retired from ministry
Hugh Smith
Kilmarnock
1875
1879
d.
James Rae
Sanquhar
1875
1879
Linlithgow, Avonbridge,
Larkhall
Brechin
Alexander Mitchell
Bellshill
1875
1879
William Forsyth
Airdrie
1875
1879
Lanark, Glasgow
Robert Jackson
Belfast
1875
1879
Eyemouth, Kirkcaldy,
Montrose.
Edward B. Kirk
Edinburgh
1876
1880
Saltcoats, Barrhead
Robert J. Kyd
Glasgow
1876
1880
Airdrie, Westhills. Joined
E.C.
Darlington
Alfred Bowman
Gainford
1877
1885
Archibald Lawson
Airdrie
1877
Died while a student
James Forrest, M.A.
Falkirk
1877
1881 1 Kilmarnock. Joined Uni-
1 tarians
Alexander D. Anderson
"
1877
1881
Port-Glasgow, Mussel-
burgh, Preston, Glasgow
George Maxwell
Wishaw
1877
1881
Belfast. Joined E.C.
John King, M.A.
"
1877
1881
Muirkirk, Falkirk, Coat-
bridge, Rutherglen, Mel-
rose
STUDENTS OF THE THEOLOGICAL HALLS
269
Date of
Date of
Remarks.
Name.
Church.
admis-
ordina-
tion.
d. means deceased.
James Russell
Glasgow
1878
1882
Kilwinning, Anstruther
John Baxter
Greenock
1878
1882
Retired from ministry
Thomas H. Walker
Glasgow
1878
1882
Dalkeith, Uddingston
Matthew Richmond
Kilwinning
1878
1882
Wick, Broxburn, Avonbridge
Shapinsay. Joined F.C.
Peter A. Andrew
Edinburgh
1878
1882
Newcastleton. Joined
Established Church
Alexander L. Allan
Kilmarnock
1879
1883
Nagercoil, South India
Thomas M 'Robert, M. A.
Glasgow
1879
1882
Dreghorn
David S. M'Lachlan
"
1879
1883
Coupar-Angus. Joined
Free Church
John Robertson
Denny
1879
1883
Muirkirk, d.
Alexander M. Higgins
Glasgow
1879
1883
Larkhall, Bellshill,
America
William S. Todd
Dunfermline
1880
1884
Motherwell, Glasgow
Robert Russell
Govan
1880
1884
Catrine, Shotts, Natal
John C. Neil, M.A.,
Coatbridge
1881
1885
Rutherglen, Greenock,
B.D.
Hoylake
David Hobbs, M.A.
Aberdeen
1881
1884
Coatbridge, Journalism
James C. M 'Lachlan,
Glasgow
1881
1885
Montrose, Lanark, Stirling
M.A.
James Hume
Leith
1881
1885
Thornhill, Carlisle
Alexander Hill
Govan
1882
1886
Glasgow, Muirkirk, Shap-
insay, Melrose, Wick
Robert Rae
Glasgow
1883
1887
Arbroath, Edinburgh
William G.Allan, M.A. ,
B.D.
Edinburgh
1883
1887
Melrose, Stockport
John Muir
)j
1883
1887
Glasgow, Edinburgh. Join.
U.P.
Andrew Ritchie, M. A.
,,
1884
1888
Langholm, Greenock
John Crawford
Eyemouth
1884
1888
Lanark, Dumbarton
David Z. H. Forson
Glasgow
1884
1888
Dalmellington, Coupar-
Angus
John E. Christie
,,
1884
1888
Sanquhar, Darvel
Joseph L. King
Wishaw
1884
1888
Ardrossan, Fraserburgh.
Joined Free Church
Charles Richardson,
M.A.
,,
1884
1888
Bathgate, Leith, Glasgow
James Neil
Coatbridge
1884
1888
Shotts, Forres, Manchester
A. F. Ferguson
Buccleuch, Edinburgh
1884
1888
Arbroath, Queensland
John M. Forson
Dundas St., Glasgow
188.5
1889
Cumnock, Glasgow
James Mitchell
J> 5>
1885
1889
Broxburn. Joined Free
Church
W. S. Angus
Govan
1885
1889
Selkirk, Blackburn
James M. Cowan
Muslin St., Glasgow
1886
1889
Ardrossan, So. Africa, d.
William J. Ainslie,
Buccleuch, Edinburgh
1886
1890
Belfast, Greenock
M.A.
J. Morison Gladstone,
M.A.
Dundas St., Glasgow
1887
1890
Joined Scot. Episc. Ch.
John Penman
Motherwell
1888
1892
Dalbeattie
Wm. Kirk, M.A.
Tillicoultry
1888
1892
Bathgate
James Wallace
Montrose St., Glasgow
1888
1892
Thornhill
James W. Gillies
Paisley
1888
1892
Quilon, India, Newcastleton
Alexander PolIock,M.A.
,,
1888
1892
Selkirk, Falkirk
John M. Ure
Dennistoun, Glasgow
1888
1892
Linlithgow, Cuddapah,
India
A. J. Forson
Dundas St., Glasgow
1889
1893
Dundee
Robert Hunter
Paisley
1889
1894
Forres, England
Thomas G. Taylor, M.A.
Buccleuch, Edinburgh
1889
1893
Eyemouth, Kendal
270
CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
Date of
Date of
Remarks.
Name.
Church.
admis-
sion.
ordina-
tion.
d. means deceased.
Robert M 'Queen
Buccleuch, Edinburgh
1889
1893
Clydebank
David Aitken
Hamilton
1890
1894
Muirkirk, Lanark
James Hamilton
,,
1890
1894
Catrine
John A. Lees
Galashiels
1890
1894
Glasgow, Stewarton
George M'Kendrick
AVishaw
1890
1894
Langholm. L.M.S.
Gordon L. M'Lachlan
Montrose St., Glasgow
1890
1894
Arbroath, America
Alexander Peart
Montrose
1890
1893
Springburn, Wyndberg,
So. Africa
Robert Rollo
Dreghorn
1890
1894
Kilwinning, Springburn
Winning Russell
Muslin St., Glasgow
1890
1894
Selkirk
John Heggie
1894
1896
James Adam
Moncur St., Glasgow
1891
1895
Wishaw
John G. M'Garva
Dundas St., Glasgow
1891
189.5
Shotts
R. C. Richardson
Wishaw
1891
1895
Greenock
John Twaddell
Hamilton
1891
Maxwell R. Kirkpatrick
Dalbeattie
1892
1896
Coatbridge
John Masterton
Buccleuch, Edinburgh
1892
1896
Ardrossan
Arthur M'Connachie
Paisley
1892
1896
Wick, Ayr
Thomas M'Kendrick
Wishaw
1892
1896
Innerleithen
THE UNITED HALLS, 1896-1900.
Wm. Moncrieff, M.A.
Perth
*
1892
1898
Bowdon
Robert Aslimhurst
Dairy, Edinburgh
*
1895
1897
Belfast
J. I. Martin
Govan
*
1896
1898
Aberdeen, Belfast
G. M'E. M'Dougall
Oban
*
1892
1899
Maryport
J. M. Dower
Belmont, Aberdeen
*
1896
1900
S. Africa
Donald Grigor
Avoch
*
1897
1900
Walkerburn
G. G. M'Arthur
George Sq., Grepnock
*
1897
Preacher
Andrew ScouUer
Shotts
+
1893
1898
Dalmellington
D. W. Gaylor
Hawick
t
1894
1898
Sanquhar
Robert Howieson
Tillicoultry
t
1894
1898
Hankey, S. Africa
James D. Liddell
Stirling
t
1894
1898
Ch'as Yang, Mongolia
R. D. E. Stevenson
Dundas St., Glasgow
t
1894
1898
Selkirk
F. L. London
Motherwell
f
1895
1899
Muirkirk
John Murphy, M.A.,
Lanark
t
1895
Preacher
B.D.
John R. Ramsey
Shotts
t
1895
1899
Newburgh
Robert Whiteford
Stewarton
t
1894
1898
Blantyre
Charles Robertson
Wishaw
t
1895
1898
Wu Chang, China
A. B. Halliday
Moncur Street, Glasgow
1896
Preacher
James Cossar
Port- Glasgow
1896
Died while a student
M. C. Roberts
Ardrossan
1896
On Roll in 1900
Arthur Shand
Belniout, Aberdeen
1898
Robert Steel
Alnwick
1896
J. Brown
Moncur St., Glasgow
1898
J. Safely
Glasgow
1898
P. J. Green
Belmont St., Aberdeei
1
1898
W. Orr
Dundas St., Glasgow
1898
J. M. Wright
Uddingston
1898
R. Steen
Motherwell
1898
G. Scanlon
Dreghorn
1898
W. Watson
Dreghorn
1898
W. Terrett
Dairy, Edinburgh
1899
*Commenced studies in C.U. Theological Hall. t Commenced studies in E.U. Theological Hall.
O (N «0 CO ^ ^ (M CO <M t^^
I I I I I I
^ CO I (M
-3l
Rl3
53 >c5
I I
cococortco ic^ leoeoo irti |(Mco
I CO coo I T)< I (M CO I I
O
fe
c3 el '^
'« n £ o
0) cs •
^-r^-^
'^3
^.2 '
A "3
ht2
Srfi
O) o
•s s
§P5
a c ®
•l-l
o
t»
rrt
0)
03
43
"o
§
O
^
rj
&
-a
&r
O
<D
;:3
1
cf
5
fa
W
o
1«
<B
m
11
O
-u
A
OJ
o
n
»J
A
r_;
o
«
O
S
3
■n
cS
o
O
3
3
OT
•^
crt
s
CO
hr)
o
^
<i;
s-(
s
^
&I)
0)
>
o
>>
<o
5
o
TS
^
o
r_r
CD
'3
,a
CO
G
a>
ci
0)
-P
^
g J > a
as >.■"
-• CL» M
^^ a -"^ fn
5^ 2 - <"
H . -« cs
o|:2 o
-*^ rt .3 ro
a .S -'-'
^ ^ a ^
a oo s "
5^1 ^
^ a a
^^^ a S
0) ?f S S
-"^ 2 S
rH O fl 2
3 p^ O o
■^^ ^-i
^ a -r; o)
^^^ ^ S
-;f rs o
O ri O
O CU ID
02 ca^
271
APPENDIX.
While it is interesting to note the fact of the religious movement
in Scotland that took place in the later years of last century as,
to a large extent, the outcome of the quickened intellectual and
religious life that was then manifested, it is still more interesting
to note that it was chiefly owing, in the providence of God, to
the labours of a few earnest and active Christian men that this
movement resulted in the formation of the great majority of the
Congregational churches in Scotland. As the names of these
men have been frequently mentioned, it may be well to give a few
biographical notes of each of them.
Robert Haldane, at the time when his interest in spiritual
things was awakened, was a landed proprietor living on his estate
at Airthrey, near Stirling. He had been a captain in the Royal
Navy, but had retired in 1783. During the following ten years
his time was spent on his estate, and in the occupations of a country
gentleman. Describing his life up to this time he said, " As to
religion, I contented myself with that general profession which is
so common and so worthless, and that form of godliness which
completely denies its power. I endeavoured to be decent, and
what is called moral, but was ignorant of my lost estate by
nature, as well as the strictness, purity, and extent of the Divine
law. While I spoke of a Saviour, I was little acquainted with
His character, the value of His sufferings and death, the need I
stood in of the atoning efficacy of His pardoning blood, or of the
imputation of His perfect obedience and meritorious righteous-
ness, and the sanctifying influences of the Eternal Spirit to apply
His salvation to my soul." Among the men whose society Mr.
Haldane enjoyed at the time of his residence at Airthrey were
Dr. Campbell of Kippen, Mr. Somerville, and Mr. Innes, one of
the ministers of the Established Church in Stirling, and Mr.
Sheriff" of St. Ninians. Much of their conversation was about
the French Revolution, and the somewhat radical ideas of social
and political reform which it had stirred in the minds of thought-
272
APPENDIX 273
ful men at the time. But there was mingled with this conversa-
tion many references to higher themes, and they talked much of
the bearing of passing events upon religion and religious life.
The result was that Mr. Haldane's interest in religion increased,
and he began to study Christianity in all its bearings, with the
desire to arrive at some settled convictions on a subject which
had become to him of highest importance. Gradually the light
broke in upon his mind, and there followed a complete surrender
of his heart and life to Christ as his Saviour. Mr. Haldane
related in later years that, although he traced his turning to God
to the instructions of his mother, and never had been without
convictions from the time he was nine years old, and although he did
not attribute his conversion to any other human agency, yet that, if
he were to point out the individual from whom he had derived
most spiritual light at the beginning of his career, he would
mention a journeyman mason, of the name of Klam, or Clam, of
Menstrie, during a walk which the two had through the woods of
Airthrey. Through the conversation of this good man he saw the
Gospel to be indeed glad tidings, and in 1795 he began to live
the life of a fully persuaded and earnest Christian man. He died
in 1842.
James Alexander Haldane was also connected with the naval
service, from which he retired in 1795. He had lost his mother
while he was in infancy. About a year before his retirement,
while on his ship, the " Melville Castle," at Gosport, and having
much time on his hands, he began to think he would pay a little
more attention to the Bible than he had given. The result was
that the more he read it the more worthy it appeared of God;
and after examining the evidences by which Christianity is sup-
ported, he became fully persuaded of its truth. Speaking of this
time he said, " However dark my mind still was, I have no doubt
but that God began a work of grace on my living soul on board
the ' Melville Castle.' His voice was indeed still and small, but I
would not despise the day of small things, nor undervalue the
least of His gracious dealings towards me. There is no doubt
that I had sinned against more light than many of my companions
who have been cut off in their iniquities, and that I might justly
have been made a monument of His wrath." Mr. Haldane died
in 1851,
" Between the brothers there was much similarity in point of
talent and disposition, but there were also strong shades of differ-
ence. Both were bold, ardent, and energetic. In the younger
there was greater quickness of perception and readiness of utter-
ance, whilst in the elder there was greater depth and originality
of character as well as a larger infusion of habitual caution. In
both there was a deep spring of genuine benevolence ; but in the
younger brother it was more apparent, and his affectionate
s
274 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
friendship was, in its generosity and disregard of self, in his
earlier years, prone to overleap the strict bounds of prudence.
This had often been remarked by their earlier associates, and
whilst both were daring James was more ready to carry his object
by a sudden dash, while Robert was more wary and thoughtful.
Yet such are the contradictions that meet us in the analysis of
character, that it sometimes happened in the course of their lives
that Robert Haldane seemed to act upon impulse, when James
hesitated and considered. This was in a measure the case with
the scheme for a foreign mission, which Mr. R. Haldane adopted
before his younger brother had yet made up his mind as to any
plan of active usefulness."
John Aikman, a native of Borrowstonness, went out in early
life to Jamaica, where he had an uncle prosperously settled in
business. This business, with all his property, he bequeathed to
Mr. Aikman, who, having determined to establish a circulating
library, returned to this country for the purpose of purchasing
books. " He saw in a catalogue the title of ' Cardiphonia, or
Utterances of the Heart,' and supposing it to be a novel, he
purchased and commenced reading it. The book, however,
proved very different from what he had expected, and became
the means of awakening him to deep concern for his soul. He
returned to Jamaica, but he could no longer enjoy the kind of
society, or endure the desecration of the Sabbath, which at that
time he found there. He therefore resigned his business into the
hands of a partner, and returned home with the determination of
devoting himself to the cause of Christ. He was fully prepared
to enter into the reviving spirit of the times, taking part in the
very first efforts for introducing the Gospel into places destitute
of it. He died as pastor of the church in North College Street,
Edinburgh, in 1834.
John Campbell had enjoyed the benefit of a good education in
the High School of Edinburgh, but afterwards engaged in trade,
and had a large ironmonger's shop in the Grassmarket. "He
was in Edinburgh the living model of a city-missionary, a district
visitor, a Scripture reader, a tract distributor, and a Sabbath
school originator long before Christians had learned to unite
themselves together in societies to promote these objects. His
warehouse was the only repository in Edinburgh for religious
tracts and periodicals, and became a sort of house of call, or point of
reunion, for all who took an interest in the kingdom of Christ."
After having joined in earnest co-operation with the Haldanes,
Mr. Aikman, and others, in inaugurating the good work described
in these pages, he became a preacher, author, minister, and
missionary-traveller in the unexplored interior of Africa. He
died in 1840.
The Rev. George Cowie, who was the minister of the Congre-
APPENDIX 275
gational church in Montrose, colleague of Mr. Aikman in Edin-
burgh for some years, and one of the tutors of the theological
classes supported by Mr. Haldane, was one of those who took a
leading part in the various movements connected with the
formation of churches in the early part of this century, although
his name was not so prominent as that of many others. He was
one of the earliest advocates and defenders of " lay preaching,"
and in the pages of the Missionary Magazine wrote many papers
the value of which M^as recognised by the brothers Haldane and
others as greatly aiding the good work in which they were
actively engaged. As a theological tutor he had great influence
on the young men who afterwards became the first pastors of the
churches, and was held by them in high respect for his wise
counsel, devoted zeal, and self-denying labours for the churches.
He had been regularly educated for the ministry, and was
"licensed" by the presbytery of Brechin about the year 1789.
For some years he officiated as English teacher in the Montrose
Academy and as assistant to the parish minister of Dun, in the
neighbourhood of Montrose, But, although he had good prospects
of a comfortable settlement in connection with the Established
Church, he resigned his position about 1796, owing to his dis-
satisfaction with the manner in which affairs were conducted in
that body, and especially to his dislike to subscription to its
doctrinal formulae, which, he said, "terrified" him, and owing
also to his growing conviction that a simpler and more Scriptural
church-life was preferable to that which he found in connection
with the Establishment or the various non-established churches.
For some time he remained unsettled and out of connection with
any of the churches, until in 1797 he heard Messrs. Haldane and
Aikman preach in Montrose, when he said, " These men appear
to combine purity of doctrine and discipline, with zeal to preach
the Gospel to all men. This will do. I will go with them, for I
perceive God is in them of a truth." Mr. Cowie forthwith
became an earnest preacher of the Gospel in Montrose and
neighbourhood. For some time he worshipped with a few Old
Scots Independents who met in a garret room, and who had two
poor tradesmen as their elders or pastors. At the death of one
of them the small church was dissolved, but about half of them,
along with others, placed themselves under the pastoral care of
Mr. Cowie, and in 1801 he was ordained as their pastor. In
1804 he left for Edinburgh to act as tutor of Mr. Haldane's
classes, and in 1813 returned to Montrose, where he laboured
until 1824, after which he removed to Edinburgh, and died there
in 1829.
William Innes was minister of the Established church in
Stirling and chaplain to the garrison. He was the brother-in-law
of Mr. Robert Haldane, over whom he had great spiritual influ-
S2
276 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
ence in the earlier days of Mr. Haldane's Christian life, and
latterly became his and Mr. James Haldane's fellow-worker in
preaching the Gospel throughout the country. He became tutor
of the theological classes for young men instituted by Mr. R.
Haldane in Dundee, and at the close of this service became pastor
of a Baptist church in Edinburgh. He died in 1855.
Greville Ewing was colleague to the Rev. Dr. Jones, minister of
Lady Glenorchy's Chapel, Edinburgh, in 1793, a position which
he resigned in 1798. He became pastor of the first Congregational
church formed in Glasgow, tutor of the theological class instituted
there by Mr. Robert Haldane, and one of the tutors of the Glasgow
Theological Academy. He died in 1840.^
The names of many other devoted men are inseparably associated
with the good work of the closing years of the century — such as
the Rev. Charles Simeon of Cambridge, the Rev. Rowland Hill of
London, Rev. Joseph Rate of Alnwick, Dr. Bogue of Gosport,
etc. ; but their share in the work was only occasional, while the
brethren above mentioned were not only its original promoters
but laboured in it continuously from the outset.
B.
" Genuine Christians had long lamented the decay of vital
religion in the land. The ministers of the olden time who had
survived the persecutions of the Stuarts preached the doctrines of
the standards of the church, established at the Reformation. But
not a few of the ministers who had conformed to the establishment
which had existed before the Reformation were continued in their
parishes on their conforming to the new establishment, and many
of them were by no means evangelical preachers. To what extent
the latter had an influence in producing the state of things which
very soon followed it is not easy to say ; but that they had an
influence can hardly be doubted. Be this as it may, it was not
long till a great change took place in the doctrinal views of a great
proportion of the young clergy. The ethical discussions common
at that time became fashionable in Scotland. Sir Henry Moncrieff",
in his life of Dr. Erskine, says : ' There was certainly at this time
in Scotland a class of preachers who, besides the absurd aflFectation
of bringing their public instructions from Socrates, Plato, or Seneca,
rather than from the morality of the Gospel, distinguished them-
selves by an ostentatious imitation of Francis Hutchinson and the
Earl of Shaftesbury.' Cold disquisitions were delivered which
spoke neither to the hopes, nor to the fears, nor to the aff'ections ;
so that the church became in many instances the dormitory of the
^ The above notes are taken from the Lives of Robert and James Hal-
dane, Campbell's Life, Times and Missionary Enterprises, Memoir of the
Life of George Coioie, by Dr. D. Davidson, and Memoir of Greville Eioing.
APPENDIX 277
parish. Pelagian and Sociniau heresies came to be openly taught
in not a few pulpits, while in others they were introduced in a
more covert manner. And where such corrupt doctrines were not
taught, there were errors inculcated which, though more refined,
were not less dangerous. In various ways there was a systematic
perversion of the Gospel of Christ by reiterated statements of a
character altogether self-righteous. The true ground of hope to
a sinner was never brought forward, or, if any reference was
made to it, the object was to hold it up to ridicule and scorn.
The doctrine of salvation through faith in the expiatory work of
Christ was reproached as hostile to morality, and this too often
by men whose own immoralities were foul and flagrant. Religion,
where any attention was paid to it, became cold and speculative ;
but in many quarters it was altogether disregarded, for the people
had sunk into a listless indifference and a torpid apathy. Had it
not been that the different bodies of evangelical dissenters kept
alive the knowledge of the Gospel in certain districts of the
country, it must, to all human appearance, have become extinct,
not only in them, but, by a natural process, even in some other
quarters. In cases where gross error was not taught, there was
fearful poverty of Scriptural knowledge and of the fruits of personal
study and observation. There was a monotonous repetition of a
few common-place topics ; the same images, like so many natural
and necessary shadows, waited on the statements ; and the con-
sequence was that the church was a picture of still life. In the
course of time men arose who gave a more respectable appearance
to a system radically the same. The polished classes were charmed
by the meagre theology and superficial morality of Blair. Not a
few followed in his wake : but we have but to glance at the flimsy
compositions bearing the name of sermons by the men of this
school, and so highly lauded by those who fancied themselves to
be people of taste, to perceive how low the state of knowledge and
of piety must have been among them. In the meantime the lower
orders of society were sinking deeper and deeper into a state of
utter ignorance, infidelity, and immorality. Corrupt doctrines, the
prostitution of the solemn ordinances of Christ to all who chose,
and the utter neglect of church disciphne, fearfully prevailed. An
empty form of religion was observed, while the power of it was
ridiculed. There is pleasure in being able to state that there were
ministers in those days of the highest eminence in piety and in
faithful ministration of the word of life, and that around them
were many devoted Christians. These mourned over the scenes
that surrounded them, and longed for a change. Much good was
effected by their instrumentahty. But such men were few and
far between.
"It ought not to be concealed, however, that even among
those who were called evangelical ministers, both in and out of
278 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
the establishment, there were not a few whose manner of
preaching could not be said to amount to all implied in beseech-
ing and entreating. While there was a correct exhibition of
orthodox doctrines, there was little feeling on the part of the
preacher, and little effect was produced on the minds of the
hearers. And, as may be supposed, there was a great deal of
empty formality, even where what is called evangelical doctrine
was heard. The truths of the Gospel were not brought home to
the conscience, as they ought ever to be. There was a pertinacious
adherence to forms and prejudices which fettered exertions on
behalf of the many who were living in a state of manifest irreligion.
There is a wide difference between the frigidness of mere didactic
statements and the warm and natural manner in which Divine
truths are introduced in Scripture, not as naked propositions, but as
intimately connected with faith and hope, with repentance and joy,
with privilege and obedience — in a word, with all the graces of the
Holy Spirit, and with all the duties, immunities, and prospects of
the Christian ; and connected, also, with the guilt, the danger, and
the responsibilities of the unbelieving and the impenitent. " —
David Russell, D.D., of Dundee, quoted in "Memoir of Greville
Ewing," pp. 621-623.
C.
" Pastoral Admonition addressed by the General Assembly of
the Church of Scotland, met at Edinburgh, May 23, 1799, to
all people under their charge.
" Dearly beloved Brethren,
"You well know that it has been prophesied in Scrip-
ture that in the last days perilous times were to come, when many
false teachers should arise, scoffers walking after their own lusts,
and when men should turn away their ears from the truth. The
prophecy has been brought to our recollection by the subjects
which, in the course of the business of this Assembly, have come
under our review. We have contemplated with devout rever-
ence events in the conduct of the Divine government which
appear to us to be a fulfilment of this prophecy, and from a sense
of the dangers to which you are exposed by these events we feel
ourselves bound in duty and engaged by affection to issue this
fatherly admonition, which your ministers, in the name and by
authority of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, will
read to you from their pulpits.
"It is too well known that in a neighbouring country an evil
and pernicious spirit has arisen which, like a pestilential vapour,
has spread its malignant influence over several surrounding states.
The unhappy nation of the French, not content with having first
slaughtered their sovereign, and overturned their own govern-
ment, not content with endeavouring by acts of violence to
APPENDIX 279
subvert the established governments of other nations, and to
introduce among them their own principles of rebellion and
anarchy, have also impiously attempted to wage open war against
the Christian faith. They have shut up their churches, studied
to abolish the memory of the Lord's Day, declared the belief of a
future state to be an empty dream, and by their emissaries and by
their numerous publications have sought to spread everywhere
abroad their atheistical tenets, and to render every nation dis-
satisfied with their own rulers, with their governments, ecclesias-
tical and civil.
"Hence has arisen that variety of books and pamphlets con-
taining the most impious opinions and propagating the spirit of
sedition and rebellion which have been disseminated with much
care among all ranks of men in this land. While such doctrines
are abroad, and many through ignorance or inadvertence are in
hazard of being poisoned by them, the solicitude which we enter-
tain for your welfare both in time and in eternity has led us to
warn you against the seduction of false teachers. Now is the
time, dear brethren, to show that you are not ashamed of your
blessed Saviour, and of His words, ' Earnestly to contend for the
faith which was once delivered unto the saints,' and to reject with
indignation that false philosophy pregnant with lies which has
wrought so much mischief amongst mankind. Listen not to any
insinuations of those who would seek to pervert you from the
sound and good principles you early imbibed, and beware
particularly that they instil not into your minds sentiments of
disaffection to that wise and mild government under which you
live. Remember with gratitude that goodness of the Almighty
which, when so many other nations have been distracted with
civil commotions and laid waste by hostile devastations, has pre-
served you in tranquillity and peace, ' every man under his own
vine and his own fig-tree,' enjoying with safety the fruit of his
labours under the protection of laws which afford equal justice to
the poor and to the rich. Instead of being captivated by that
empty sound of liberty which has proved to be only another name
for anarchy or tyranny let zeal for true religion ever remain in
your minds, united with attachment to our happy constitution,
and with loyalty to that gracious sovereign with whom Providence
has blessed us.
"It is much to be lamented that whilst we are assaulted by
false principles imported to us from abroad there should of late
have arisen among ourselves a set of men whose proceedings
threaten no small disorder in the country. We mean those who,
assuming the name of missionaries from what they call the Society
for the Propagation of the Gospel at Home, as if they had some
special commission from Heaven, are at present going through the
land, not confining themselves to particular stations, but acting
280 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
as universal and itinerant teachers and as superintendents of those
who are established tJie teachers of religion by the church, intrud-
ing themselves into their parishes without any call, erecting in
several places Sunday schools without any countenance from the
Presbytery of the bounds, the minister, or the heritors of the
parish, committing in those schools the religious instruction of
youth to ignorant persons altogether unfit for so important a
charge, who presume not only to catechise but also to expound
the Scriptures, or to persons notoriously disaffected to the civil
constitution of the country, and connecting those schools with
certain secret meetings in which, as we are informed, every person
is bound not to spread abroad anything that is said or done to
the prejudice of any of the members, into which no person is
admitted without the consent of the whole of the members, and
which keep a correspondence with other societies in the neigh-
bourhood. You see the men who, by themselves or their
associates, conduct those Sunday schools or secret meetings,
bringing together assemblies of men in the fields or in places not
intended for public worship, where, pouring forth their loose
harangues, the}^ frequently take the liberty of censuring the
doctrine or the character of the minister of the parish, studying to
alienate the affections of the people from their own pastors, and
engaging them to join this new sect, as if they alone were
possessed of some secret or novel method of bringing men to
heaven.
"Hitherto, brethren, you have regarded a regular standing
ministry as a Divine institution. You have been taught that the
Lord Jesus Christ Himself did not act in a public character with-
out producing and proving a heavenly commission that the extra-
ordinary endowments which He conferred upon His apostles were
their warrant for appearing as the preachers of His religion, and
that the evident connection between these endowments and the
appointment of the first ministers of the Word is a direction to
Christians in all succeeding ages to consider the office of public
teachers as a Divine ordinance, the exercise of which requires
talents corresponding to the importance and difficulty of the
charge. You know that the church of Christ, in conformity
to these principles, prescribes a long course of education to those
who are trained for the office of the holy ministry, and, in order
to prevent the misapplication of literary studies or talents, requires
from all whom she licenses to preach the Gospel the most solemn
engagements that they will adhere to the standards which she has
published of her doctrine, worship, discipline, and government.
But all this care and solicitude concerning the ministry of the
word which we and our fathers learned from Scripture is now
ridiculed as unnecessary. The men who assume the character of
missionaries declare that every man has a right to preach the
APPENDIX 281
Gospel, and they are now traversing the whole country as evan-
gelists without any sort of authority, without giving any pledge
for the soundness of their faith or the correctness of their morals,
and without those advantages of regular education and of pre-
paratory knowledge which, under every form of a Christian
church, ever since the age of miraculous gifts, have heen held as
indispensably necessary for the useful and successful discharge of
a Gospel ministry.
"We wish to judge charitably of all men. We are willing to
hope that amongst those missionaries there are several worthy
well-meaning people who have been led astray by men more
artful and designing than themselves. But it is impossible not
to perceive that the whole scheme and the manner in which it is
conducted discover more of a spirit of ambition and vanity and of
a desire to claim a lordly dominion over your faith than of the
spirit of the Gospel, which is a meek, an humble, and a peaceable
spirit, and a spirit of order, and not of confusion. And whatever
may be the intentions of some who have engaged in this scheme
the manifest tendency of their proceedings is to foster the
violence of a blind intemperate zeal, to unsettle the minds of
many, to throw their principles loose by distracting them with
novelties, and to make them become ' like clouds without water,
carried about of winds.'
" You may have been led by curiosity to listen for a while to
what these strange and self-authorised teachers of religion have to
say. But that any of you will give them lasting countenance or
adhere to them as guides, forsaking upon that account the
Established Church, in whose principles you were baptised and
under whose wings you have been bred up, we are persuaded
better things of you than to believe or suspect. For, is it to be
imagined that any well-disposed or sober-minded Christians could
think of deserting those houses of God in which their fathers
have so often worshipped, and which have so often resounded
with their songs of praise, in order to follow up and down a sect
of men whom you know not whence they be 1 Is not the Church
of Scotland, which has been distinguished by the testimony of
many generations for the purity of its doctrines and the character
of its ministers, worthy of your steady and most zealous attach-
ment, that church in defence of which your forefathers fought
and bled, and which has produced so many confessors and
martyrs in the cause of our common faith ? Much reason there
is to suspect that those who openly profess their enmity to our
ecclesiastical establishment are no friends to our civil constitution,
and that the name of liberty is abused by them, as it has been by
others, to cover a secret democracy and anarchy. Persevere,
therefore, in those principles in which you have been bred, and
which you have hitherto honourably manifested. Beware, beloved
282 CONGREGATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND
brethren, of all who would shake your attachment to the Estab-
lished Church of Scotland. By diligently improving those stated
means of instruction which she provides for you, and always con-
sulting the sacred Scriptures as your supreme rule, the path of
duty will be clearly pointed out to you. But those who ' heap
to themselves teachers having itching ears,' those who are con-
tinually seeking new guides, wander into many unknown paths
which lead them into dangerous snares and errors.
" In these giddy times when the love of innovation so much
prevails, and when the spirit of innovation has broken forth in so
many forms, listen to the words of truth and soberness. ' We
speak as to wise men, judge ye what we say.' Recollect the
counsel and practice of your fathers, recollect your own experience
of instruction and edification, under a well-ordered and regularly
ordained ministry. 'Stand, brethren, in the ways and see, and
ask for the old paths, Avhere is the good way, and walk therein,
and ye shall find rest for your souls.' And may God enlighten
and fortify your minds by His good Spirit, and amidst all dangers
enable you to ' behave yourself wisely in a perfect way.'
" Subscribed, in name of the Assembly, by
"William Moodie, Moderator."
The End.
GLASGOW : PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS BY ROBERT MACLBHOSE AND CO.
WORKS BY THE SAME AUTHOR.
Churches of Christ: Their Constitution and Order.
A Manual of Congregational Principles and Practice.
1885.
W. Lindsay Alexander, D.D., LL.D. : His Life and
Work. 1887.
A System of Biblical Theology. By the late Dr.
W. Lindsay Alexander. 2 Vols. 1888. [Edited.]
(0
DATE DUE
_,.,„--^
»#
'om^^^^m
i^l^
GAYLORD
PRINTED IN U.S.A.
, i ,,
; ■f)^
V.
' , « \ ■
v'-'itii"..'