If flmnk, mM,. Pm., ej,E.,. nni
H-a 11
.■^'
A HISTORY OF INDIA
BY
A. F. RUDOLF HOERNLE, M.A. (Oxford), Ph. D.
•^ (Tiibingenj, C. I. E.,
Indian Educational Service (Retired Listj, Late Principal
Calcutta Madrasah, and Fellow of the Calcutta University ;
Ex-President of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Ex-Presi-
dent to the Board of Examiners in Oriental
Languages, Fort William, Calcutta ;
AND
HERBERT A. STARK, B.A. (Calcutta;,
Bengal Educational Service, Head Master, Calcutta Madrasah
Late Inspector of Schools, Orissa Division ; Member of the
Asiatic Society of Bengal.
^Fourth Edition. Revised and Enlarged. j
CUTTACK :
ORISSA MISSION PRESS,
[all rights reserved.]
DS
/909
bC?
M/iy
1903 — PwksfV-^ation Edition.
"^Q^^KiR-ST Edition.
?Sfj
igo^, — ^SECoNny Edition.
1906— ^^rj^'^Edition.
^o«^TH Edition.
, 1 906 — ^i^^
Printed and published at the Orissa Mission Press, Cuttack
by Rev. R. J. Grundy, Supt.
Prefatory Note to First Eijition.
IN writing this History, the chief points the authors had in
view were to present it in an interesting narrative form, as
well as in agreement with the results of modern research, — in
both respects (as they believe) a new departure
'Rhe numerous inscriptions, coins, and manuscripts, dis-
covered in late years, as well as a more extended study of
Sanskrit, Arabic and Persian Literature have brought to light
a mass of new facts which have greatly modified many hitherto
accepted views of Indian History. Having for many years
acted as Philological Secretary to the Asiatic Society of Bengal
and Numismatist Adviser to the Government of India, the
first of the joint-authors has had special facilities for the study
of the new information. To those who are not familiar with
the latter, his presentation of the earlier history of India,
comprising the first three Empires, may come as a surprise.
Lengthy references to authorities, and discussions of rival, and
(it may be) di.scredited theories would obviously be out of
place in a short School History. But in order to assist
Teachers who may be desirous of further informing themselves,
a selected list of the best and latest writings on Indian Anti-
quities has been added.
The history of the Fourth and Fiftli Empires has been
written after consulting standard works on the periods con-
cerned, and the events recorded are those which have been
established by the investigations of discriminative and compe-
tent scholars of Indian History.
A. F. RUDOLF HOERNLE.
November, igo6. HERBERT A. STARK.
Prefatory Note to Fourth Edition.
The present edition has been revised throughout, and its
information brought up-to-date (especially in Chapters vi-viii)
in the light of the most recent researches and discoveries up
to 19&S.
Septe7jiher igoH 'I^he Authors.
CONTENTS
'List of Recent Writings on the Early History of
India . . [1-4]
Matriculation History Syllabus of the Calcutta
Uni\-ersity ... [S'S]
Introduction. The Physical Features of India and
some Observations thereon i-vii
Chap. Page.
I. — The Pre-historic Period. The .Aborigines. Be-
fore 1500 B.C. I
II. — The Pre-Vedic Period. The Aryans in their
Original Home. Before 2000 B.C. 5
[11^ — The Vcdic Period. The Aryans in the Punjab.
About 1800 to 1000 B.C. . 7
IV. — The Brahmanic Period. The I'nited Indo-.-Aryans
in Northern India, .\bout 1000 to 550 B.C. 13
V. — The Early Buddhist Period. The Greek Invasion.
The First, or .Maurva, Empire. The Rise of Bud-
dhism. Abt)ul 550 to 150 B.C. 22
Vi._The Later Buddhist Period. The Parthian and
Turki Invasions. The New Buddhism. .About
150 B.C. to 300 A. D. 41
VH. — The Early Hindu Period. The Second, or Gupta,
Empire. The Brahmanic Revival. .About 300
to 650 A. D. 55
VIII. — The Later Hindu Period. The Ciurjara Empire.
The Earlv Muhammadan Invasion. .About 650
to 1200 A.D. . 67
IX. — The Earlv Muhammadan Period. The .Muham-
madan Conquest. The Third ( First Muhamma-
dan), or Turki, Empire. .About 1200 to 1525 A.]). g2
X. — The Later Muhammadan Period: —
Section I. The Fourth Indian, or Second Muham-
madan, or Mughal, Empire. 1526 to 1803 a.d. 107
Section II. The Rise and the Fall of the Marathas. 127
Section III. The Sikhs ... . . 140
XL>— The Early Period of the Company —
Section I. The First European Settlers. 1498 to
1783 A.D. 153
CONTENTS.
C^HAP
Pagj.
.I.'^
Section II. The struggle between the English and
the French. 1741 to 1783 a.d.
Section III. Robert Clive and Warren Hastings.
174410 1778 A.D. ... ,-.S
XII.— The Later Period of the Co,npan\-. The Building
up of the PZnglish Empire in India. The Gover'^
nors-General after Hastings. 1785 to 1858 a.d. ,176
XIII.— India under the Crown. The fifth, or British,
P^mpire of India. The \'iceroys of India. 1858
to 1903 A.D. ... .. ,
XIV.— India, Past and Piesent ... ... 2>4
Index
Glossary
1. 1ST OF MAPS.
Physical Map of Ind.a ... . Facing Introduction
1 he Aryan Dispersion ... .. Facing page i
Ihe Disintegration of the Gupta Empire ... '74
The Mughal Empire in the Time of Aurangzeb 118
British India in the Time of Lord CornwalHs " 1,7
British India in the Time of Lord Dalhousie '" 200
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
Reception of the Ambassador*
King, Khusrii II.,
of the Persian
1.
2.
4-
5-
6.
7-
8.
chha\'i Oiiecn
Indian Silver Coin of Alexander
Asoka's Column
View of Rummin Dei and the Asoka Column
Asoka Inscription
Buddha under the Tree
View of the Oldest Stupa at Sanchi
Inscribed (basket of Buddha's Relics
Kanishka's Cold Coin of Buddha
Rock Temple of Kaiiasa
Gold Coin of Chandra Gupta and his
Iron Pillar and Outub Minar
Coin of Vishnu X'ardhrma ...
Column of Victory
Kashmir Coin of Vikramaditva
Autog-raph of King Harsha .
Medal of the Horse-sacrifice
Deccan Coin of Harsha Deva-
Gold Coin of Gangeya Deva
Indian Coin of Mahmud
Gold Sikandar as-Sani C^oin of Muhammad I
Brass Token of Muhammad II.
Atala Mosque
Tanka of the lunperor Altamsh
Kmperor Babar
Kmperoi- Akbar ...
Akbar's Gold Asirgarh Medal
Akbar's Coin
Coin of Jahanoir and Nur [ahan
The Taj Mahal .
Jumma Mas] id .
Dewan-i-Am
Gold Coin of Shah Jahan
Aurangzeb's Coin
Sivaji's Fort at Rajgarh
Robert Clive
^^'arren Hastings
Lord Cornwall is ...
Company's Pice of 1833
The Residency, Lucknow
Frontispiece.
P.\GE.
25
26
28
3'
32
33
39
46
53
56
57
59
59
60
Tm
63
73
S4
88
96
98
100
106
107
[ Id
I I 1
113
114
115
116
117
117
122
128
159
167
176
195
212
LIST OF RECENT WRITINGS ON THE
EARLY HISTORY OF INDIA.
Chapters I and II.
(1) 1908. Sir Herbert Risley : The People of India.
(2) 1906. Georg-e A. Grierson : Languages of India and the
• Linguistic Survey. (In Journal, Society of Arts.)
C3) IQ03. Indian Census Report for 1901 : Part I., Chapter
VI I. , on Languages, by Dr. G. A. Grierson.
14) 1901. O. Schrader.- Reallexicon der Indogermanischen
AltL-rthumskunde: Especially the article " Urheimat
der Indogermanen."
(5) 1890. O. Schrader and F. B. Jevons: Pre-historic Antiqui-
ties of the Aryan Peoples.
Chapters III and IV.
(1) 1900. A. A. MacdoncU : History of Sanskrit Literature.
(2) 1900. E. Washburn Hopkins : the Great Epic of India.
(3) 1897- R- Pick : Die Sociale Gliederung im Nordostlichen
indien zu Buddha's Zeit. (Also for Chapter V.)
(4) 1896. E. Senart : Les Castes dans I'lnde.
(5) 189-?. R. C. Dutt : History of the Civilization of India,
based on Sanskrit Literature.
Chapters III. to VIII.
(^11 1908. The Indian Empire, Vol. 1 L, Historical, (in the
Imperial Gazetteer of India.;
(2) 1908. Vincent A. Smith; The Early History of India.
(2nd ed.j
(3) 1906. Vincant A. Smith: Catalogue of Corns m the
Indian Museum, Calcutta. The Introductions to
the several Sections.
Chapter V.
Asoka's Reign.
(i) 1901. V. A. Smith: Asoka. (In •' Rulers of India"
Series. )
(2) 1894. G. Bahler; Asoka's Edicts. (In Epigraphia India,
Vol. II. j
General History.
(3) 1903. T. W. Rhys Davids: Buddhist India. (In "Story
of the Nations" Series.)
(4) ^898 E. l-Rapson: Indian Coins. (In Encyclopaedia of
Indo-Arvan Research.) (Also for Chapter VI.)
(5) 1891. Sir A. Cunningham : Coins of Ancient India.
[ 2 ]
Buddhism and Jainism.
(6) 1898. A. F. Rudolf Hoernle : Jainism and Buddhism.
(In Calcutta Review. Also in Annual Address to the
Asiatic Society of Bengal ; in its Proceedings.)
(7) 1898. W. C. Peppe and V. A. Smith : The Piprahva
Stupa. (In Journal, Royal Asiatic Society.) Also
J. F. Fleet (ibid., 1906-7.)
(8) 1897. H. Oldenberg- : Buddha, his Life, Doctrine and
Ordar. (English Translation of ist edition by W.
Hoey, 1882).
(9) 1895. H. Kern; Manual of Buddhism. (In Encyclopaedia
of Indo- Aryan Research.)
History of \Vriti)ig.
(10) 1904. G. Buhler: Indian Paleography (In Indian Anti-
quary, Vol. XXXIII, Appendix.
(11) 1898. G. Buhler: Origin of the Indian Brahma Alphabet.
History of Art.
Jas. Burgess: Buddhist .\rt in India.
A. Foucher : L'art Greco- Bouddhique du Gandhara.
(12) 1901.
113) 1905-
Chapter VI.
Northern India.
(i) R. D. Banerji : The Sc}thian Period of Indian History.
(In Indian Antiquary, Vol. xxxvii. )
(2) 1908. E.J.Rapson: Coins of the Andhras, \V. Kshatrapas,
etc. (British Museum Catalogue. Especially the
Historical Introduction, pp. i-CLXV.)
(3) 1906. J. F. Fleet : The Traditional Date of Kanishka.
(In Journal, Royal Asiatic Society, p. 979).
(4) 1906. V. A. Smith: The Indo-Parthian Dynasties. (In
Journal, German Oriental Society.)
(5) 1903. V. A. Smith: The Kushana Period. (In Journal,
Royal Asiatic Society.)
(6) 1900. Boyer : L'epoche de Kanishka. (In Journal Asia-
tique.)
(7) 1899. D. R. Bhandarkar : The Origin of the Saka Era.
(In Journal, Bombay Branch of the Royal Asiatic
Society.)
(8) 1889-1893. Sir A. Cunningham : In NumismaticChronicle.
(9) 1886. P. Gardner : Coins of Greek and Scythian Kings
in India. (British Museum Catalogue.)
Southern India.
(10) 1896. J. P". Fleet: Dynasties of the Kanarese Districts.
(In Bombay Gazetteer, Vol. I., Part II.)
[ 3 ]
(ii) 1895. R. G. Bhandarkar: Early History of the Dekkan.
(In Bombay Gazetteer, Vol. I., Part II.)
Buddhist Art.
See Chapter V. No. 12, 13.
Chapter VII.
Gupta Period.
(1) ' 1905. F. Kielhorn : Chronological Supplements, in Ap-
pendixes I and II, to Vol. VIII of the Epigraphia
Indica.
(2) 1902. V. A. Smith : Revised Chronology of the Early
Imperial Gupta Dynasty. (In Indian Antiquary,
Vol. XXXI.)
(3) 1889. A. F. Rudolf Hoernle and V. A. Smith : Inscribed
Seal of Kumara Gupta. (In Journal, Royal Asiatic
Society of Bengal.)
(4) 1889. V. A. Smith : Gupta Coinage. (In Journal, Royal
Asiatic Society.)
(5) 1888. J. F. Fleet: Inscriptions of the Early Guptas and
their Successors. (In Corpus Inscriptionum Indi-
carum, Vol. III.)
(6) 1909. Some Problems of Ancient Indian History. No. IV.
The Identity of Yasodharman and Vikramaditya.
(In Journal, Royal Asiatic Society, p. 8g.)
Vikramaditya Period.
(7) 1903- ^- P- Rudolf Hoernle : Some Problems of Ancient
Indian History. No. I. (In Journal, Royal Asiatic
Society.)
Revival of Brahmanism.
(8) igoo. R. G. Bhandarkar : Peep into the Early History of
India. (In Journal, Bombay Branch of the Royal
Asiatic Society.)
See also Chapter VI., Nos. 10 and 11.
Chapter VIII.
Northern Empire.
(i) 1905. Girindranath Dutt ; The Brahmans and Kayasthas
of Bengal. (In The Indian Review.)
(2) 1904. .■\. F. Rudolf Hoernle: Some Problems of Ancient
Indian History. No. II., the Gurjara Empire, and
1905, No. III. the Gurjara Clans. (In Journal,
Royal Asiatic Society.)
(3) ^1902. D. R. Bhandarkar : Gurjaras. (In Journal, Bombay
Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society.)
(4) 1900. M. A. Stein : Translation of Rajalarangini.
[ 4 ]
(5) i897- Major R. G. Raverty : Translation of the Tabaqat
i Nasiri. (In the Bibliotheca Indica. Also for
Chapter IX.)
(6) 1894. Sir A. Cunningham : Coins of Mediaeval India.
Southern Empire.
(?) IQOS- S. Krishnasvami Aiyangar : The Making of Mj'sore.
(8) 1900-03. J. F. Fleet : Ganga and other Inscriptions, (In
the Epigraphia India.)
(9) 1890. Sir Walter Elliot: Coins of Southern India. (In
Numismata Orientalia.)
(10) See Chapter VT., Nos. 10 and 11.
Chapter IX.
Northern India.
(i) 1903. Lane Poole: Mediaeval India. (In the " Story of
the Nations" Series.)
(2) 1894. Lane Poole : Muhammadan Dynasties.
(3) 1871. E.Thomas: Chroniclesof the Pathan Kings of Delhi.
Southern India.
(4) 1900. R. Sewell : A Forgotten Empire f Vijayanagar.)
(5) See Chapter VI., Nos. 10 and 11.
Chapters I-IX.
Perhaps the most useful guide-book is C. Mabel Duff's Chro-
nology of India, giving in chronological order a table of events
from the birth of Buddha down to the Mughal conquest, or from
557 B.C. to 1530 A.D., each entry being supported by copious re-
ferences to authorities up to the date of publication, 1899.
Numerous articles on points of detail by Messrs. Bendall,
Bhandarkar, Biihler, Fleet, Hara Prasada Shastri, Hoernle, Hop-
kins, Hultzsch, Jacobi, Kielhorn, Levi, Senart, Stein, and others,
may be found in the following periodicals :
(i) Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal.
(2) Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society.
(3) Journal of the Bombay Branch of No. 2.
(4) Journal Asiatique (French).
(5) Journal of the German Oriental Society.
(6) Journal of the American Oriental Society.
(7) Indian Antiquary.
(8) Epigraphia India.
(9) Vienna Oriental Journal.
(10) Archaeological Survey Reports of Sir A. Cunningham,
J. Burgess, and others. «
(11) Numismatic Chronicle.
(12) Numismata Orientalia.
(
[ 5 ]
Index to Subject-Heads in the Matriculation History
Syllabus of the Calcutta University.
SUBJECTS.
The Physical Features of the Country.
The Aborigines of India. Immicrrations from the North-east and
North-west.
The Aryans. The I ndo- Aryans.
The Vedas. Relation of the Rig-- Veda to other Vedas.
The Brahmans. The Smritis. Manu.
The Caste System.
Buddha and Buddhism.
Mahavira and the Jains.
The Kingdoms of Kosala and Magadha. The Empire of the
Nan das.
Invasion of Alexander the Great.
Accounts of India given by Greek Writers.
The Maurya Empire. Chandra Gupta. Asoka.
The Kushana Empire. Kanishka. The Saka Era. The Gupta
Empire. Buddhist Architecture and the Fine Arts.
Chinese Pilgrims. Kali Das. Vikramaditya. The Vikrama Era.
Rise of the Rajputs.
Muhammadan Conquest of Sind and the Punjab.
Mahmud of Ghazni.
Hindu Civilization on the eve of the Muhammadan rule in Incia.
The Tdrki (Pathan) Dynasties. Muhammad Ghori. Outbuddin.
Altamsh. Raziyyat. Mughal Invasion.
[ 6 ]
Conquest of Gujarat; Malwa ; and the Deccan. Incursions into
Southern India. Allauddin.
The Tughlak Dynasty. Muhammad Tug-hlak. Firuz Tughlak.
Timur's Invasion.
Break-up of the Pathan Empire.
The Muhammadan Kingdoms of Delhi, Bengal, Jatunpur.
Gujarat, The Deccan.
The Hindu Kingdoms of Vijayanagar, Meywar (Rajputana and'
Udaipur) and Orissa.
Rise of Religious Sects under Pathan Rule ; Ramananda, Kabir,
Nanak, Chaitanya. Spread of Muhammadan ism.
Pathan Architecture. The Urdu Language. Indian Literature
in Pathan times.
The Mughal Dynasty, Babar, Humayun, Sher Shah, Restoration
of Humayun.
Akbar, Todar Mall, Abul Fazl.
Jahangir, Nur Jahan, Sir Thomas Roe.
Shah Jahan, Bernier, Mughal Architecture.
Aurangzeb, Rajput Revolt. Aurangzeb's treatment of Hindus,
Sivaji and the Marathas.
Break-up of the Mughal Empire. The Successors of Aurangzeb,
Revolt of the Provinces, Invasion of the Marathas, Inva-
sion of Nadir Shah and .A.hmad Shah Abdali, Struo-crle for
supreme power between Muhammadans and Marathas.
The Maratha Confederacy. Extent of Maratha Dominion.
Contact of the Marathas with the English.
The Europeans in India. Discovery of the Cape route to India by
the Portuguese. The Dutch, the French, and the English
Merchant Companies, and early Setdement. First Charter of
the East India Company. *
The French in India. Duplei.x.
[ 7 3
The English in India, Clive. English Wars and Territorial
acquisitions in Madras, Bengal and Bombay. Plassey. The
Dewani. Early History of Calcutta. Clive's Sj'stem of ad-
ministration.
Warren Hastings, his Financial, Revenue and Judicial Reforms,
his Relations with Native Powers. The Regulating Act.
Warren Hastings first Governor- General. Extent of British
Dominion in his time. Pitt's India Bill.
Lord Cornwallis, his administration Reforms. The Permanent
Settlement.
Sir John Shore, his Non-intervention Policy.
i.ord Wellesley, his wars with Mysore, and with the Marathas.
The system of Subsidiary Treaties.
Lord Minto, State of Central India, Extension of Relations of
British Indian Government with Foreign Powers outside India.
Renewal of the Company's Charter.
Lord Hastings, his Wars with Nepal, and with the Marathas.
Lord Amherst, the first Burmese War.
Lord William Bentinck, his Social and Administration Reforms,
Renewal of the Company's Charter. Sir Charles Metcalfe.
Lord .\uckland, his Policy, the First Afghan War.
Lord Ellenborough, the Sindh War.
Lord Hardinge, the first Sikh War.
Lord Dalhousie, the Second Sikh War, the Doctrine of Lapse, and
the Annexation Policy. The Second Burmese War. Material
Progress of the Country under Dalhousie.
Lord Canning. The Indian Mutiny, Probable Causes, the Assump-
tion of Direct Government by the Crown. The Queen's
Proclamation.
India Ander the Viceroys, Financial Reforms. The Orissa
Famine, and other Great Famines. The Second, and Third
[ 8 ]
Afffhan Wars. The Third Burmese War. DeUmitation of
Frontier Boundaries.
The Marathas, their Rise; Sivaji and his Successors. Maratha
System of War, Administration, and Revenue. Rise of the
Peshwas. Baji Rao, his Successors. Origin of the chief exist-
ing Maratha States.
Mysore: an Ancient Hindu Kingdom. Haidar Ali, his Wars with
the Marathas, the Nizam and the English. Tipu Sultan.
Restoration of the Hindu Dynasty.
The Sikhs, Their origin and Religion. Guru Govinda. Their
struggle with Ahmad Shah Abdali. Ranjit Singh, his
Conquests, the Khalsa. Ranjit Singh's Successors.
ft:
J
INTRODUCTION.
The Physical Features of India, and some
. Observations thereon.
TXDIA may broadly be divided into three distinct
parts. The first is the Himalayan region, which in-
cludes Kashmir, Nepal, Sikkim and Bhutan. The second
is the Great Plain between the Vindhya Mountains and
the Himalayas. It contains the Punjab, Rajputana,
Central India, the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh,
and Northern Bengal. Th» third is the Peninsula of
India, otherwise known by the name of the Deccan.
It comprises all the country lying between the Vindhya
Mountains and Cape Comorin.
1. The Himalayan Reg-ion.— The Himalaya Moun-
tains may be described as a double wall running from
east to west. The Indus, the Sutlej, and the Sangpo
(Brahmaputra) take their rise on the Tibetan side of the
northern wall, while the southern slopes of the first
or southern wall hold the sources of the Ganges and
its northern tributaries. From their north-western
extremity the Himalayas send out into Afghanistan
a knot of wild and rugged mountains called the Hindu
Kush. Similarly, from the eastern extremity of the
Himalayas the Patkai Hills take their start in a
southerlv direction. The Chinese spent much time
and labour in building the Great Wall of China in order
that they might prevent their warlike neighbours from
invading the country. But Nature has provided India
with a mightier barrier in the Himalayas on her north-
ern boundary. These mountains have prevented the
Mong5han races of Asia from making incursions into
the rich plains of the Ganges, and India has never been
A
ii INTRODUCTION.
anxious about the defences of the north. But it must
not be supposed that there is absolutely no way of
getting to Tibet from India. For at the western ex-
tremity of the Himalayas, there are two sets of passes,
one set leading into Eastern Turkestan and Tibet, and
another set leading into Afghanistan. Among the former
may be mentioned the Mustagh, Karakoram and Ghan-
chenmo Passes, and among the latter the Khaibar,
Bholan and Gonial Passes, and the Kuran Valley, It
was through the north-western passes that the early
Aryan and Turki immigrants came into India. The
gorge through which the Brahmaputra enters India at
the north-eastern corner is so narrow that, though it
admitted Tibeto-Burman and Tai immigrations, nothing
is to be feared from the invasion of an enemy in that
direction.
2. The Great Plain. - The Great Plain of Northern
India is watered by three systems of rivers, (i) The
Punjab is irrigated by the Indus and Sutlej which gather
their water on the northern side of the southern range of
the Himalayas, and by their tributaries — the Jhelum,
Chenab, Ravi and Beas — which obtain their supplies
from the southern slopes of the same mountains.
(2) Rajputana, Central India, the United Provinces,
and Northern Bengal are fertilised by the Ganges,
which, with its tributaries the Jumna, the Goomti,
the Gogra and the Gunduck, takes its rise in the
southern sides of the Himalaya. The southern con-
fluents of the Ganges, e.g., the Chambal and the
Sone, emerge from the Vindhya Mountains. The name
Hindustan is applied to the' tract of country bordered
on the north by the Sutlej and on the south by the
Chambal, and also includes the Trans-Gangetic provinces
of Oudh and Rohilkhand. Its eastern portion between
the Ganges and the Jumna is designated the Doab. The
fertihty of the Great Plain attracted the early Aryau and
other settlers, and it became the scene of those ancient race
I
INTRODUCTION. Ill
movements which have permanently influenced the
civiHzation and pohtical destinies of the whole of India.
How the Aryans took possession of the Great Plain,
and amalgamated with the aboriginal races whom they
found there is related in Chapters I and III.
3-, The Deccan op Peninsula of India.— The term
Deccan in its widest application embraces the whole of
Southern India from the Vindhya Mountains to Cape
Comorin, In a somewhat restricted sense it comprises
the Central Provinces, Berar, the Presidencies of Madras
and Bombay, Mysore, and several protected states, chief
among which are those of the Nizam, Sindhia, and
Holkar. In its narrowest application it is the name of
the high inland tract between the Narbada and the
Krishna. The line which separates it from the Great
Plain is formed by the Vindhya Mountains and the
system of hills connected with them — the Aravalli Hills,
the Satpuras, the highlands of the Central Provinces,
the Caimur Range, and the Rajmahal Hills. This chain
of connected mountain ridges for centuries protected
the Deccan from invasions in the same manner, though
in a lesser degree, as the Himalayas checked incursions
into the Great Plain from Central Asia. But more than
this, for several centuries they frustrated every effort to
bring the Deccan and Northern India under the sway
of one and the same emperor.
From the western and eastern extremities of the
Vindhyas two mountain ranges, known as the West-
ern and Eastern Ghauts respectively, run in a southerly
direction and parallel with the sea. The margin between
the Arabian Sea and the Western Ghauts is exceedingly
narrow, and this tract of country having been cut off by
Nature from the rest of the peninsula, its people are in a
backward condition when compared with the inhabitants
of other parts of India. On the other hand, a broad strip
of lowland lies between the Eastern Ghauts and the
Bay of Bengal. It is irrigated by the Mahanadi, Goda-
IV INTRODUCTION.
veri, Krishna and Kaveri, which, taking their rise in
the western side of the Deccan, flow across the penin-
sula, and emerging through the openings in the Eastern
Ghauts empty themselves into the Bay. Consequently
the Karnatic, the Northern Circars, and Orissa have
always been accessible to civilizing influences, and in
them the ancient dynasties of Southern India fixed their
capitals. The Western Ghauts are much higher than
the Eastern Ghauts, and there are no rivers that flow
into the Arabian Sea between Surat and Cape Comorin.
The inner triangular plateau, shut in by the Vindhya
Mountains and the Western and the Eastern Ghauts, rises
from 1,000 to 3,000 feet above the level of the sea. It
is entered on the west by several passes, the chief of
which, the Bhor Pass, was in ancient times regarded as
the key to the Deccan. Another important opening
into the plateau is the Thai Ghat. The physical features
of the Deccan, and particularly the rugged mountains of
the Western Ghauts, made it possible for the Marathas
to develop those methods of warfare which made them
a terror to their neighbours, and a thorn in the side of
the Mughal Emperors at Delhi.
It is common to speak of India as the central pen-
insula of Asia. But this is incorrect. For if a line be
drawn from Cape Monze through Calcutta to Chittagong
it will be seen that only the part of India south of that
hne, which may roughly be taken to coincide with the
Tropic of Cancer, is a peninsula, while the portion of
the country north of that line belongs to the mainland
ot Asia. Furthermore, Cape Comorin is onlv eight de-
grees from the Equator, whereas Kashmir is thirtv-six
degrees from it. While, therefore, the southern half of
India lies within the Torrid Zone, its northern half falls
withm the North Temperate Zone. We must therefore
expect to find the Deccan differing considerably from the
Great Plain and the Himalayan Belt in respect of its
natura products and inhabitants, its climate and scenery
Accordingly, in the Punjab, North Rajputana, Sindh, and
INTRODUCTION. V
a part of the United Provinces, the vast plains, which
in the summer months are scorched by a burning sun,
are in the rainy and cold seasons covered with crops of
wheat, barley, maize, and other cereals of the temperate
zone. In Lower Bengal, on the other hand, the vegeta-
tion is luxuriant, and rice grows plentifully. The Deccan
has ?i uniform temperature throughout the year, and its
vegetable products are distinctly tropical. Its western
side receives much rain from the south-east monsoons ;
but the deficiency of raiafall on its eastern half is
compensated by the water derived from the rivers that,
passing through it. flow into the Bay of Bengal. Being
altogether dependent upon the rains for its harvests, any
excess or failure of rain results in a famine, of which
there have been several. On the Malabar and Coro-
mandal Coasts, which are within the influence of the
brine from the sea, cocoanuts and palms abound. The
physical features of Lower Burma are similar to those
of Lower Bengal : but Upper Burma is hilly, less tropi-
cal, and less fertile. In respect of climate every varia-
tion of temperature prevails, from the eternal snows of
the Himalayas to the great iieat of the tropical south.
A corresponding difference is observable in the charac-
teristics of the inhabitants. In the north we have fair
races of people ; but as we go south the complexion
of the natives of the country becomes darker, and thev are
less robust. Mountains and a cold climate produce good
fighting races, and hence the Ghurkas, the Sikhs, the
Punjabis, tlie Baluchis, the Pathans, the Dogras, the
Rajputs and the Marathas are the best soldiers in the
Native Army.
It might reasonably have been expected that India,
with a sea coast of 5000 miles — from Cape Monze to
Point Victoria in Tennaserim — would be a great maritime
country. But such is not the case. It must be re-
membered that she has but few harbours, and that, as
will be explained in the next paragraph, she is a self-
contained country. Moreover, in olden times she was
vi INTRODUCTION.
SO far iVom every naval power, that she origmally had
nothing to fear from enemies from across the seas, save
from such minor pests as pirates who formerly landed in the
creeks of the Malabar coast, or at the mouths of the rivers
of the Coromandal coast. She, therefore, in bye-gone
days, kept no navy ; and thus she was all unprepared to
oppose the landing of European nations when they first
anchored off her shores. Indeed, the only direction
from which India may be invaded is through the passes
along the North-West Frontier, and here the British
Government has supplemented the protection afforded
by Nature by building a chain of fortresses and outposts,
and by furnishing them with strong garrisons of
soldiers.
From what has been said it will be seen that
India occupies a peculiar position. It may be likened
to a fortress, protected in its northern half by mountain
ranges with almost insuperable passes, and in its southern
half by coasts almost destitute of natural harbours ; while
within its own borders, with its varying climes, it pos-
sesses an abundance of desirable natural products of
man}' kinds. This peculiar position of India accounts
to a great extent for most of the special features of its
history and its civilization. For it tended to foster a
home-staying, self-contained population ; and none of its
races developed into either a conquering or a seafaring
nation like the Greeks or Romans of old, or the English
of modern times. Its history has been enacted wholly
within its own borders, which indeed are wide enough to
permit of great variations and changes in point of politics
and in culture. But though well protected from the
outside world, India never has been entirely excluded
from contact with it. At an early date, some maritime
intercourse from its scanty harbours did take place with
the Persian Gulf in the west and with the Chinese coast
in the east. But though India, contented within its own
borders, has never sent out hordes to seek new abodes,
or armies to conquer neighbouring countries, it has been
INTRODUCTION.. Vll
repeatedly the victim of immigrations and invasions of
peoples from beyond its borders. These outsiders modi-
fied its political history and added elements to its culture,
but they were never able to deprive either of its pe-
culiarly Indian character.
Only once did the self-contained character of India
suffer a relaxation. This was when Buddhism was
being spread beyond its borders ; and this conspicuous ex-
ception shows how deeply the soul of the people must
have been stirred by that great religious movement.
CHAPTER I.
TJie Pre=historic Period : The Aborigines.
INDIA is not so much a country, as a continent.
Hence also it exhibits continental
characteristics. One of these is that India & Europe,
its inhabitants are of many races, many languages,
and many religions. In a country this might have
been different. Take, for example, France or Germany.
Their people are of one race, one language, and one
religion. But then they are merely countries. The}"
are much smaller than India, which indeed is about
seven times as large as either France or Germany.
In fact, India is rather larger than the whole continent
of Europe, with Russia excluded. If now we compare
it with Europe, the difference disappears ; for Europe,
like India, has many races, languages, and religions. The
reason of this manifoldness is the same in both cases ;
it is the result of the wholesale migrations that often
took place in ancient times.
In the earliest ages of which we have any know-
ledge, India was inhabited by a certain
race of people who were distinguished Aborfffines
by very dark skins and flat noses. We
call them Aborigines, that is the people of the begin-
ning, because we do not know whence and when they
came into the countr}*. There are certain linguistic
reasons which seem to show that at some very remote
time that race, which is now known as the Mon-Khmer,
was spread not only over the whole of India, but ex-
tended also far eastwards into Burma and Siam. At
the p^resent day the race survives only in scattered
remnants which are called Mundas, or, less appropriately.
2 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Kolarians, and which include most of the uncivihzed
tribes that are still found inhabiting widely separate tracts
of India. They are the Bhils, Kols, Santhals, Juangs,
and other tribes of Central India, the Khasis of Assam,
the natives of the Andaman and the Nicobar Islands,
and the Veddas of Ceylon. They still retain most of
the characteristic features of their remote forelathers.
These were a savage people, living in small bands in the
dense jungles and forests which then covered most parts
of India. Their occupation was to hunt wild animals,
or to raid upon one another, which they did with
weapons made of stone. They lived on the wild pro-
duce of the jungle, on roots, and fruits, and raw flesh,
and they knew neither the breeding of cattle, nor the
tilling of land ; nor had they any settled laws or forms
of government. They made pOts of clay, and baked
them in fire. They buried their dead, and over their
graves they set up upright slabs of rock or circles of
stones. It is from these, and the things dug up in them,
that we are able to form some idea of the life and the
customs of the wild Aborigines.
But there were other aboriginal inhabitants of
India who were not so wild. These
Abor^ines were the Dravidians, such as the Ta-
mils, Kanarese, Gonds, and others.
There are, again, certain linguistic reasons which seem
to indicate that this race migrated into India from the
south at a very remote time, when possibly there
still existed some land connection with Australia. It
would appear that they gradually conquered the Mun-
das whom they found in occupation of the country.
With these Mundas they intermarried and amalgamated ;.
but they preserved their own Dravidian form of speech.
^ In fact, what happened in their case was probably very
\y similar to what occurred subsequently, as we shall see
\ in the following chapters, in the case of the Aryan im-
migrants from the north-west. At the present day,
the Dravidians form the prevailing population of
Ch. I.] THE PRE-HISTORIC PERIOD. 3
^mtheiD-ljidia, but in tlie pre-historic age they must have_
been spread over some^parts of NoillienLlndiajis w_ell.
They inhabited everywhere the plains and valleys of
the large rivers, which they had cleared of forest, and
made fit for the cultivation of land and for the breeding
of cattle. They lived in settled communities, under
fixed faws and government. They possessed fortified
strongholds as a protection against the raids ot the sur-
rounding wild tribes. They wore garments, used im-
plements and weapons of copper, and put on ornaments
of gold. Their religion included a phallic cult as well
as the worship of snakes and trees, which things were ^ .
at first repugnant to the Aryan invaders, though later^\ /
on, when the latter amalgamated with the earlier m-P^^
habitants, they were admitted under the worship of
Siva. It is probable that they carried on a brisk mari-
time trade to the Persian Gulf from the western shores
of India, and that in connection with it, perhaps in the
seventh century B.C., they invented the rudiments of
the Indian system of writing. Most ot these things we
know from incidental statements in the Vedic hymns,
which show that certain portions of the aboriginal in-
habitants possessed a degree of civilization equal to, if
not higher than, that of the Aryan tribes which invaded
their country and conquered them.
Besides the Dravidian, two other immigrations de-
serve some notice. These came into
India from the north-east, but as they fmm?grJuon°
never penetrated into the country far-
ther than the wild vaUevs of the Himalaya__and_its
offshoots whjch form the n^rth^agtenTcorner ot ^_"dia,
th eynever Exerted any Influence on the_couiseIorTts
history, nor helped to mould its civilizationTand a very
brief notice, therefore, will suffice. The original home
of these noithz£a^ieDi-J4niuigrants_is^upposed to have
been t,he country round the head-waters of the Yangtse-
Kiang in China, whence they came down into Eastern
India by the valley of the Brahmaputra. They did so
4 HISTORY OF INDIA.
in two successive waves. The first to come were the
so-called Tibeto-Burman tribes which settled in the
valley of Assam and in the hills of the eastern frontier
down to Chittagong. They have their name from the
fact that their main stream spread and settled outside
India in Burma and Tibet. Their entrance into India
lies far back, and its date is not exactly knowii. The
second immigration, which is that of the Tai tribes,
took place in comparatively modern times. These
tribes, under the name of the Shans, settled in Eastern
Burma and Siam in the sixth century A.D., but sub-
sequently a small portion of them moved into Assam
about 1228 A.D. There, after several hundred years of
conflict with the Chutiyas and Kacharis, they finally
succeeded, 1540 a.d., in establishing their rule. Their
kingdom, known as that of the Ahoms, reached the
height of its power towards the end of the seventeenth
century ; but afterwards it fell a prey to internal troubles,
which, early in 1825 a.d., led to Its being annexed to
the British dominions.
V
1^
CHAPTER II< .
The Pre=Vedic Period : The Aryans in their Original
Home.'
Before 2000 B.C.
R
ESPECTING the original home of the Ar^ajas-two
\i main theories have been held.
The older of them places that home in E{]p(/pi^nc
Weste,mjjirkestan ; the other, which
has the support of a mass of anthropological and linguis-
tic evidence, refers it to^South£m_Russia, or some other
part of Europe. According to this theory, there lived,
in pre-historic periods, a hardy race of nomads, probably
in the extensive steppes of Southern Russia in Europe,
along the banks of the river Volga. They were mainly
a fair-skinned people, with well-shaped noses and hand-
some faces. They wandered from one pasturage to
another with their flocks of cattle, goats and sheep, trans-
porting their families and goods in light waggons drawn
by horses. Rivers were crossed by them in boats cut
out from the trunks of trees which grew along the banks.
The milk and the flesh of their herds served as food, and
of the skins the}' made for themselves simple garments,
as well as of the hair or wool which they spun and wove
in a primitive fashion. They also kept bees for the sake
of the honey, from w^hich they prepared an intoxicating
drink called mead. They used implements of stone, and
weapons of copper with which they defended themselves
against the depredations of wolves and bears and other
wild animals. While temporarily settled on a pasturage,
they dwelt in huts made of wood and loam, or in cavities
dug in the ground. At such times they raised small crops
of barle5'and millet which they roasted and crushed to bake
into cakes, and they also trafficked by barter with neigh-
6 HISTORY OF INDIA.
bouring races for such things as their own steppes did not
produce. The sky, the sun, the moon, the dawn, fire,
wind, and thunder seemed to them gods ; and accord-
ingly they feared and sought to propitiate them. They
had no priests, but cunning men among them claimed
by sorcery to control the gods and to heal diseases.
Their men got for themselves wives by capture or pur-
chase. The husband had an absolute right of sale or
death over his wife and children ; and for the widow of
a chief it was considered proper to die at the grave
of her husband. They lived together, two or three
generations in a joint-family. Several such families made
up a clan, and several clans formed a tribe. From among
the clan-lords, one was chosen chief or king of the tribe,
to administer its common business, and above all to act
as supreme commander in war.
In course of time the race multiplied to such an
extent that the pasturage of the common
Dispepsion of area did not suffice for the needs of all the
pelns'!^^'^"''^' t"^^s- This may have been about four
thousand years ago. So those tribes who
lived on the borders of the area, made up their minds to
seek new homes in other parts of the world. Those
living on the western border went south-west into
Europe and settled in England, France, Germany, Italy,
Greece and elsewhere. But one large tribe which
frequented the pasturages on the south-eastern border
at the head of the Caspian Sea, and whose members
called themselves Aryans, crossed the Ural river into
Asia, and wandered south-east into the steppes of
Western Turkestan between the Caspian Sea and the
river Yaxartes or Sir Darya. Here the Aryans were
settled for some considerable time.
CHAPTER III.
The Vedic Period : The Aryans in the Punjab.
About i8oc — looo B.C.
AFTER a time, there arose among the Aryans, in
their new home on the northern
side of the Hindu Kush, a religious re- fmmigratKm!
former, known by the name of Zoroaster.
A large portion of them, known as the Iranians, accepted
the reform. This gradually caused such serious discord
with the rest of the Aryans that the Iranians determi-
ned to separate. They crossed the mountain barrier, and
wandered westward and settled in Iran, or Persia. Some
time afterwards, another portion of the Aryans, who had
not accepted Zoroaster's reform, also crossed the moun-
tains. But these migratedsouthward into India, and, for
that reason^jvre knownas thTIndo- Aryans.^ The separa-
tion of the Aryans, and their respective settlements,
occurred at some time between the i8th and i6th centu-
ries B. c. This we know from certain recently discovered
cuneiform inscriptions In India, the Indo- Aryans occu-
pied the country on both sides of the Indus and as far as
the Jumna, that is, Eastern Afghanistan and the Punjab.
Within this new home, they remained settled for several
centuries, probably down to about looo B. c. But it
must not be supposed that the settlement was effected
in the space of a few years or without any trouble.
On the contrary, fierce fights took place with the
aboriginal race that already occupied the country.
It has been explained, in Chapter I, that the abori-
ginal Dravidians were a comparatively „.
civilized people. In this respect they S?Dravidians.
were hardly interior to the mvading
Aryans ; but the latter were a more hardy race, stronger
8 HISTORY OF INDIA.
both physically and mentally. So it is no wonder that the
Dravidian civilization was overwhelmed by that of the
Aryans. The most striking evidences of this fact are that
. the Aryan language entirely ousted the Dravidian, and
that the Dravidian people, though numerically far superior,
were entirely subjected to the Aryan domination, and
incorporated into the Aryan community, of which' hence-
forth they formed the lowest or Sudra class. At the same
time, the incorporation of such a numerous class could not
but leave its mark on the physical constitution and the
social organization of the Aryans. At the first contact
with the aboriginal population, the distinction of colour
was a marked feature. In the Vedas the Aborigines
are described as krishna or dark, or as being of the
dasa-variia, that is, the enemies' colour, in contrast to
the arya-var7ia, or friends' (i.e., fellow-clansmen's) colour,
which was fair. But by the end of the Vedic period,
the distinction of colour had practically disappeared.
For though the word for colour ( varna) survived as a
general term for caste, it was no longer used as a mark
for distinguishing one caste from another.
Caste, in the proper sense, as we shall see in
Chapter IV, arose in the next period ;
Origin of Classes, j^^^ ^^^ necessities and vicissitudes of
the Aryan migration led to the rise of "classes," which
did not exist in the original European home. There,
apart from differences in wealth, all the individual
nomads were equals ; the only approach to a distinct
class was made by the magician or sorcerer, who got his
living not by cattle-breeding but by ministering to the
religious instincts of his clansmen. But when the Aryan
people, in the course of their wanderings, passed from
the steppes into a countr)" of mountains and forests,
they had to exchange a nomadic life for that of the
vaisya. or settler, whose occupation was to clear the
forest and till the ground. Moreover, though to ward
off raids at first every man had to be a warrior, yet when
it came to regular fierce warfare with the Aborigines
Ch. Ill,] THE VEDIC PERIOD. 9
of Other countries, the necessity arose for a class of
men who devoted themselves to the practice of arms.
Being the fighters for, and the protectors of, the people,
under the leadership of the raja, or chief, they came to
occupy a privileged position as being the rajanya, or the
chief men, i.e., the nobles. A long course^Fsuecessiul
wandering ancl warfare naturally led the Aiyan__to a
higher conception of his gods, to whose favour he felt
that he owed it. Out of mysterious powers to be feared,
the gods grew to be, for him, personal and beneficent
beings, worthy of receiving his brahman, that is, prayer
and praise. Simultaneously the^Wizards of old grew up
into a class of cultured Brahmans, whose business it was
to compose hymns in praise of the gods and to sacrifice
to them. Thus by the time the Aryans had effected
their sgttlemenL-in — oorth-western India about_j_ooo
B.C., they were divided into three classes, the
Rajanya, Brahinana, and Vaisya, to which the subject
ABorigines were added as a~fourth class of Sudras.
These classes, however, had not yet become castes ; for
the Brahmans, though very influential, were not yet the
dominant class, nor was it impossible to pass from one
class into another.
The high-water mark of the culture reached by
the Indo- Aryans in the person of their xj, d- a
Brahmans, is exhibited in the Rigveda. ^^ ^
This is a collection of upwards of a thousand skilfully
composed hymns, mostly, though not exclusively, of a
religious import. For that early age, their literary
excellence is asfonishing ; few compositions comparable
to theTmcan be found among any other people. The
collection must have been finished as early as 1000
B.C., and has since been handed down with scrupulous
care and accuracy. Most of the hymns of the collec-
tion appear to have 'been composed in the extreme
eastern portion of the area occupied by the Aryans,
that is^ not far from the right bank of the Jumna, in the
district of Thanesar, south of Ambala, between the
10 HISTORY OF INDIA.
two small rivers, the Sarsati and the Chitang. Hence
this district was called the BraJimavarta or the home
of the Brahman, i.e., of the Vedic Hymns of prayer
and praise. It was also named Kiinikshetra, that is,
the land of the Kurus, who were one of the most
distinguished tribes among the Aryans of India.
From the Rigveda, which is a contemporary work, we
are able to gather a trustworthy account
fion^° Civiliza- ^f ^y^^ gj-^^-g ^^ civilization of the Aryans
between three and four thousand years
ago. The following are some of the main features. Their
^cial division into four classes has been already men-
tioned. As to~tlieir political organization, it remained
practically unchanged, and consisted oflribes, clans, and
joint-families. Though the}'' were conscious of their
unity in race, language and religion, there was no cohesion
between the tribes, though for temporary purposes
they readily formed confederations. Just as the govern-
ment of the joint-family was patriarchal, so that of the
tribejmL^ionaichical. i he king being once elected by
the clansTThe office generally became hereditary. His
power, however, was limited b}' the will of the people
expressed in the Samili or tribal assembly. The settle-
ments were villages, consisting of houses made of wood,
with the domestic fire in the middle. There were no
towns, though there were fortified enclosures on hill-tops,
made of earth and stones, and stockaded. Ordinarily,
however, these were not inhabited, but used only as
places of refuge during raids or floods. In manners and
customs we notice an advance in refinement. As to
marriage, contract takes the place of capture or purchase ;
the wife occupies a position of greater honour in the
household ; when the husband dies, she is no longer expect-
ed to cremate herself with him. The commonest crime
appears to have been cattle-liftmg ; and the commonest
vice, gambling, and in connection therewith ruinous
debts, and indulgence in sofna and sjira, two kinds of
spirituous liquor. The chief articles of food were milk,
Ch. III.] THE VEDIC PERIOD. II
ghee, and grain of various kinds ; flesh, especially of
bulls which had been sacrificed, was also eaten, but only
on ceremonial occasions. The chief occupations were
cattle-breeding and agriculture, and at certain times, ot
course, warfare. The first of these was their principal
source of wealth ; accordingly the cow enjoyed an almost
sacred veneration. As to industries, such as those of the
carpenter, smith, potter, and tanner, they were only just
beginning to arise ; for, as a rule, every household sup-
plied its own needs, especially by weaving clothes, and
making utensils of clay, wood or metal. There existed
much trade in the form of barter. In this the cow
formed the measure of value ; though payment was often
made in gold ornaments and jewelry. Silver was not
known, but copper and perhaps iron were. Of these latter
metals the implements of agriculture were made as well
as the weapons of war — ploughs, spears and axes. But
the principal weapon was the bow and arrow. In war-
time the leading warriors went to battle in chariots,
protected by coats of mail and helmets, but never on
horseback. In times of peace the chariot was used for
racing. This was a favourite amusement, as well as
dancing in the open air, and music performed on the
drum, the flute, and the lute. The religious beliefs, were
undergoing a change. Some of the earlier gods were
fading away, and others were coming into prominence.
As a natural consequence of their life of migration and
warfare, Indra, the god of battles, is now the favourite
and national god. Other chief gods are Varuna, the god
of law and order, the Maruts or storm-gods, and espe-
cially Agni (fire) and Soma (a certain plant), the gods of
the great Fire and So7na sacrifices. Vishnu and Siva are
hardly yet known ; nor do anv images or temples seem
to have" existed. The gods had each a distinctive attri-
bute ; but they had several attributes also in common.
When the hymns were composed, these geyieral attri-
butes we5e uppermost in the mind of the poet, and so
people conceived the idea that the many gods they
12 HISTORY OF INDIA.
adored were but the various aspects of One Divine Beings
who was present in ever}^ part of the universe. Here
we see the first beginnings of that philosophic thought
which was so greatly developed in the next period, and
which has ever distinguished the Aryans of India.
CHAPTER IV.
The Brahmanic Period : The United lndo=Aryans
in Northern India.
About looo — 550 B.C.
IN the preceding chapter we have seen the Aryans
fully establisheduiLJil£--Eii«jah_jlawiilo_ab-Qi^
B.C. It was about this time that an
event occurred which not only led to Remarks^^'^^
a further extension of the Aryan occupa-
tion of India, but also produced those-gxeatjchanges in
the physicaLap^jearance and the social organizatioQ of
the Aryans which transformed them^Tnto the Indo-
Aryans, and, apart from their language, render them so
thoroughly distinct from their kinsfolk dwelhng in
Europe.
This event, as the linguistic and ethnic conditions
of India seem to indicate, was a second
irruption of Aryans into India. Of the Second Aryan
Aryan stock which remained behind in Immigration,
the mountainous regions of Western
Turkestan just north of the Hindu Kush, another portion
appears gradually to have migrated directly south into
the Punjab, through the passes of Chitral and Swat.
In the course of this migration it absorbed most of the
aboriginal population of those parts, and in doing so adopt-
ed some of its peculiar practices. Among these may be
specially n^ientioned polyandry and witchcraft, as testified
by the MahabJiarata and the AiJiarva~Veda. In the
plains of the Punjab, the new-comers came into contact
with the earlier settlers ; and a sharp struggle for the
possession of the country ensued between them. The
former worked themselves into the midst of the latter like
a wedge, forcing them to spread out further in all direc-
14 HISTORY OF INDIA.
tions, especially, at first, towards the east, along the
valleys of the Jumna and the Ganges, and later also
across the Vindhya Range into the valley of the Nar-
bada. The ultimate result, however, of the conflict was
that the two contending parties, together with their
allies among the aboriginal races, were welded into one
people, with new physical characteristics as well as a
new and unique civilization, which is known as Brah-
nianic. All this had come to pass by about 500 B.C.
In the period of conflict one of the most important
of the contending tribes was that of the
Conflict of the Bharatas,to which the Kurus,or Kauravas,
earlier and belonged. From this circumstance the
\^^i<^JfJt^^ great epic, known as the Mahabharata,
immigrants. &^^^ .^^ ^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^ ^^^^ Descen-
dants of Bharata, takes its name ; hence, also, India as
the home of the united parties, is known as Bharata-
varsha or the land of the Bharatas. A reminiscence
of the conflict is preserved in the Rigyeda. Some of
its hymns speak of a great battle— in which the Bharatas
took a prominent part— as having occurred on the banks
of the Ravi, between King Suda's and a confederacy of
ten kings. In the Mahabharata, another great battle
is described as having lasted eighteen days near the banks
of the Jumna, and as having been fought between
Yudhishthira, king of the Pandavas, and one hundred
Kaurava princes. The former with their polyandric
customs represent the new-comers, while the Kauravas
are the earlier settlers ; and it may be that the initial
stage of their conflict is described in the Rigveda, while
the Mahabharata has preserved a tradition of its final
stage, which resulted in the formation of the united
Indo-Aryan people. In any case, the fact that both
contending parties are represented as having been
Bharatas, shows that the conflict was one between two
branches of the same Aryan stock. The story of the
conflict itself is very ancient, but in the Mahabharata,
which was composed in the subsequent period fsoo B.C. —
/
Ch. IV.] THE BRAHMANIC PERIOD. I5
500 A.D.), history is treated poetically. Two points,
however, we can clearly discern from it : the growth
of a common national feeling, and the rise of large
monarchical states.
We find mention of aboriginal tribes fighting side
by sjde with the Aryans as friends and
brothers. TheoldVedic terms of ^m/zwrt peo ^6^°"^^^^^^
or dark and dasa-varna or enemy-
colour, which the fair-skinned Aryans contemptuously
applied to the aboriginal races, are disappearing. The
Aryans and Aborigines are merging into each other, and
becoming the Indo-Aryan people — one in national feel-
ing as well as in outward appearance.
Side by side with this evolution, we observe a
growth in political organization. The
small tribal communities of the Vedic ftaSs'^^^" ^^
period are now crystallizing into larger
territorial states, which give place, as we shall see in the
next period, to far-reaching empires. These states possess
regular capital cities, and are ruled by Maharajas or
Great Kings, instead of, as hitherto, by mere Rajas or
Chiefs. Thus we find a confederate kingdom of Panchala
or the five cities, in the middle of Northern India, in
what are now the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh.
Some of its capital cities were Kanyakubja (or Kanauj),
Kausambi and Mathura, the Chief of the last of which
was Krishna, who afterwards, for some reason no longer
ascertainable, came to be deified as an incarnation of
Vishnu. To the east, Panchala was bordered by the
kingdom of Kosala, the modern Oudh, with its capital
at Ayodhya, and, further on, the republic of Vaisali,
forming a curious exception to the general monarchical
organization. In Kosala once reigned the famous king
Dasaratha, and his still more famous son Rama, who also
afterwards came to be deified as another incarnation of
Visbiiu. His victorious march through Southern India
to the conquest of Ceylon, poetically described, forms
the other great Indian epic, called the Ramayana.
.16 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Still further to the east two more kingdoms arose ;
those of Videha and Magadha, the modern North and
South Bihar. The former is famous through its great
king Janaka, the father of Sita, who was the queen of
Rama and the heroine of the Ramayana. With Maga-
dha was joined the kingdom of Chedi, or the country
round Jabalpur and Bilaspur, under the great king
Jarasandha, who is a prominent figure in the great
conflict of the two Aryan branches. Further south-
west came the kingdoms of Nishadha and Vidarbha, on
the two sides of the Narbada in Central India, roughly
corresponding to Southern Malwa and Berar. They are
the scene of the beautiful Nalopakhyana, the epic tale
which narrates the fortunes of Nala, king of Nishadha, and
his consort Damayanti, the daughter of the king of Vidar-
bha. Numerous legendary stories of this kind have sur-
vived in the Mahabharata and Ramayana, but of the real
history of those kingdoms we know practically no more
than their names, and the fact that they were formed,
partly by conquest, but probably more so by peaceful
colonization in which the forceful Aryans prevailed.
Everywhere the latter constituted the ruling class, and
their language and civilization superseded everything
that existed before.
The form of government in these states was auto-
cratic. The king's power was not limited
Political and \yy ^^vy assembly either of the whole
Economic Con- ^ ,-' c ^\. ^■ i rr i
dition. people or of the ruhng class. He kept a
council of ministers and a staff of officers,
but they held office at his pleasure. His rule vras bene-
volent or tyrannous, according as his character was good
or bad, strong or weak, observant of law and custom or
the reverse. There was no lack of warfare, but it gener-
ally took place on the borders ; it was the business of
the king, and of the ruling military caste and their mercen-
aries. The ordinary population was considered neutral
by both sides, and, on the whole, was allowed to live in
the undisturbed pursuit of agriculture, trade, and industry.
Ch. IV.] THE BRAHMANIC PERIOD. IJ
The whole population was practically divided into two
classes. One was the ruling class, consisting of the
martial Kshatriya and the learned Brahmana castes.
Both were exempted from the payment of taxes, and
ordinarily the king and the government of the country
belonged to the former. The other, which was the subor-
dinate class, was constituted of what were collectively
called the Vaisya and Sudra caste, that is of the numer-
ous castes into which the peasants, merchants, craftsmen
and labourers of every kind were divided. They had
to pay taxes for the cost of wars, and for the upkeep
of the king's court and the government, but, on the
other hand, they were exempted from military service,
and were allowed the peaceful pursuit of their daily
business, and, in many cases, the accumulation of much
wealth.
It was especially in the central part of Northern
India that the conditions above described
prevailed ; that is in that part which Jf^Cas^?^"^
embraces most of the present United
Provinces of Agra and Oudh. This is the Madhya-desa
or Mid-land, which was celebrated as the centre and
nursery of Brahmanism. It was undoubtedly that part
of India which was most thoroughly aryanized ; where
the Brahmanic civilization developed ; and whence it
gradually spread over the whole of India. The most
striking feature pf this^rahniame-Givilizalionjsjta^ystem
of_caste. The history of its origin has been always,
even in ancient times, a matter of much speculation.
In the previous chapter we have seen how the vicissitudes
of the Aryan- immigration into India tended to^iyide
theneople intolo^^Iasies^ Among these a very influ-
entiaTpositionlvas naturally held by the Brahmans, that
is, by those who possessed the brahman or religious
lore, and performed the sacrifices, on which, for the
Kshatrjya or martial class, success in war, and for the
ordinary population, prosperity in agriculture, pasture,
and industry was.believed to depend. With the increasing
l8 HISTORY OF INDIA.
complexity of the political and economic conditions,
this feeling of dependence on the Brahmans naturally
Jjecamejncreasingly strong. At the same time, as with
the expansion of the Aryan occupation of India the
absorption of aboriginal people into the Aryan com-
munity grew larger, the,desire of the ruHng class, that is,
of the Brahmans andiCshatriyas, grew stronger to pre-
serve the purrty^D^3!^?£ISjyan descent through the
preventiorroiTnTefmarriage^and sociaj_contact ; and this
policy, of necessity, tended to make each class a heredi-
tary institution. Thus the combined action of the
feeling of dependence and the principle of heredity (jaii),
resulted eventually in the establishment of that system
of caste, in which the Brahmans are supreme, and all
classes are divided from one another by the insuperable
barrier of birth and the prohibition of intermarrying and
eating together. It is probable that it was the Brah-
man class who first succeeded in forming themselves into
an exclusive caste : but the example of such an influen-
tial class naturally proved infectious, and thus their policy
filtered downwards through all classes, till finally it
embraced the whole Indo-Aryan community, including
the aboriginal elements incorporated in it. It is not fair
to say that the pride and self-interest of the Brahmans
caused them to build up the caste system. The Brah-
mans are no more responsible for it than any of the
other classes, except in so far as they may have origin-
ally set the example. Being the only class with literar>'
culture, they systematized the process which was going
on all around them, and recorded it in their books of
religion and law. As a matter of fact, their systema-
tized theory of four castes does not agree with the
reality. Though the divisions of the ruling class, the
Brahmans and the Kshatriyas, especially the former, are
real castes, the two divisions of the ordinary population
into Vaisyas and Sudras are only theoretic abstractions.
As to that population the truth is that it consists of a
very large number of real castes, which are based on
CH. IV.] THE BRAHMANIC PERIOD. 1 9
grounds of race and occupation, and enjoy varying
degrees of social rank.
Simultaneously with caste, there grew up the other
institution of asrania or the methodical
division of one's life. It was to consist J? Asrama!^^^'^
of four stages : ( i ) study {brahmacharya)
in one's youth, (2) founding a household and exercising
a profession (grihastha) in manhood, and (3) meditation
either as a settled recluse {vanaprastha), or (4) as a
houseless wanderer {safnnyasin) in old age. This institu-
tion had a somewhat similar history to that of caste.
Started by the Brahmans, it was more or less copied by
the other castes : but it never obtained the same ab-
solute hold, as caste did, on the imagination and practice
of the people.
It was a natural consequence of the priestly func-
tion of the Brahman class that literary Literature
culture first grew up among them. It
was their duty to preserve the ancient hymns without
which no sacrifices could be offered. To this end they
made a Samhita or collection of all the Rich or Vedic
verses then known to exist, and this collection is known
as the Rigveda. Further, as the verses were used in
different sacrifices for which different rituals were want-
ed, they sorted the hymns so as to form three different
Satnhitas or collections. Thus arose the collection of
Yajus or sacrificial formulas called Yajurveda, and
the collection of Saman or sacrificial chants called
Saniaveda. Later on, there was added a fourth collec-
tion of Atharva7i or incantations, called Atharvaveda.
Moreover, since the ancient Vedic hymns were by
this time becoming unintelligible, the Brahmans were
obliged to spend much labour and ingenuity in explain-
ing them. Thus there grew up a number of theological
works, under the name of Brahmana. Again, the
constant occupation of the Brahmans with religious
matters, naturally disposed them to pursue speculations
regarding the nature of God and the World, and the
20 HISTORY OF INDIA.
>
relation of these to each other. This study gave rise to
the theosophical and philosophical treatises, known as
the Arayiyaka and Upanishad.
The growth of the Brahmanic literature was accom-
: . panied by a growth of Brahmanic religion
fffon^^^^ ^^^^" ^"^^ religious practices. The crude poly-
theism of the Vedic period gradually
assumed a monotheistic aspect. The chief g-ds of that
period, Indra and Varuna, sank into the lower position
of the subordinate gods of the sky and the sea ; and
Brahma rose into prominence as the Supreme God who is
the Prajapati or Lord of the Creation. Later on, there
developed a great division of the people into Vaishnavas
and Saivas, according as either Vishnu or Siva, both origin-
ally Vedic deities, were adopted as the Supreme God. But
practically this division only represents two different
views of the same religion— rOne more tender and refined,
the other more coarse and passionate ; and this fact is
typified in the so-called Indian Trinity of Brahma, Vishnu
and Siva, that is, the Supreme God in his three manifesta-
tions of Creator, Preserver, and Destroyer. The Saiva
form of the Brahmanic religion, however, more distinctly
preserves traces of the incorporation of aboriginal beliefs
in the worship of the Linga and the reverence paid to
the snake. As to the exercise of this religion, whether
Vaishnava or Saiva, it consisted in the mere mechanical
performance of elalDorate sacrifices, or of Voga, that is,
asceticism, of various grades of severity. In either
case, the principal object of the worshipper or the
ascetic was to secure from his God some worldly ad-
vantage.
By the side, however, of this prevailing ritual or
• pra.ctics.l'view of religion (karma-kha?ida)
Panthe^sm^ there always existed among the more
spiritual members of the Indo-Aryan
community a speculative view of it (/na?ia-khanda).
For tl]em the aim was, not the attainment of earthly
happiness, but the release from mundane existence by
Ch. IV.] THE BRAHMANIC PERIOD. 21
the absorption of the individual soul into the Alma?i or
World-soul, and this absorption was to be attained by
means of jnana, or correct knowledge, of the nature
of things. This, and not sacrifice, they maintained, was
the Vedanta, that is, the real end oraim of the Veda.
This was the view of the few, the pious and thoughful,
who, abandoning the performance of sacrifices, often
retired from the world to live as recluses in the forest.
They held that the visible world was nothing but an
illusion {maya) of the ignorant, that in reality there
existed but One (atman) who was All in All ; and that
the attainment of this conviction {jnana) led to the true
deliverance imoksha). Accordingly they advised a life
of contemplation ; for a life of action [karma], as it tended
to keep a man in a state of ignorance, could not result m
his deliverance from misery, but only in a continuous
series of re-births, more or less full of misery according as
his; good or bad actions had preponderated This is the
lamous Brahmanic doctrine of transmigration {samsara)
and its cause (karma), which gradually became so firmly
established in the whole Indo-Aryan community that,
as we shall see in the next chapter, it was accepted by
Buddha without question, and included by him in the
tundamental tenets of his religion.
CHAPTER V.
The Early Buddhist Period:
The Greek Invasion, the First (or Maurya) Empire, and
the Rise of Buddhism.
About 5§o — i%o B.C.
THE preceding chapter has shown us that, during the
Brahmanic period, the Indo-Aryan occupation of
India had extended to the borders of
Remarks!^^^ Beji^al and the valley of the Narbada.
In tire period we are now considering
it spread still further to the east over Bengal, and to the
south over the whole of the Deccan and as far as Ceylon.
It was, however, in the main, not an occupation by
armed conquest, but a peaceful subjection of the whole
of India to the morally and intellectually more powerful
Indo-Aryan civilization. The only parts which formed
an exception were the wilder regions of Central India.
Here the aboriginal inhabitants remained in their
ancient savage condition. Also in the kingdoms of the
east coast and the south, such as those of the Andhras,
Cholas, Keralas, and Pandyas, which correspond to a
part of Haidarabad and to Madras, Mysore and
Travancore, though the Brahmanic laws and customs
prevailed, the government remained in the hands of
the Dravidians, and their languages (Telugu, Tamil,
and others) maintained their ground.
The spread of the Brahmanic civilization was much
assisted by the fact that gradually nearly
'"f M^^"^^°"^ "^^ whole of India came under one
political rule. We have seen how, in
the preceding period, a large number of states ?rose
of varying sizes. Gradually one state among them be-
Ch. v.] the early BUDDHIST PERIOD. 23
came the most powerful and brought under its subjection
the weaker states on its borders. The process, once
begun, went on in ever widening circles, till at last a
great empire was formed which embraced nearly the
whole of India. It extended from beyond the Indus
to the mouth of the Ganges, and from the Himalayas
down to modern Mysore, where it adjoined the
Dravidian kingdoms of the Cholas, Keralas and Pandyas.
This was the First Indian Empire, and the nucleus from
which it grew up was the kingdom of Magadha or South
Bihar. At the beginning of this period, that kingdom
was ruled by a Kshatriya dynasty, called Saisunaga, the
fifth king of which was Bimbisara, a contemporary of
Buddha of whom some account will be given presently.
He ascended the throne about 543 B.C., and his capital
was Rajagriha. He was murdered by his son Ajatasatru,
who succeeded him about 491 B.C. This king was h
strong and aggressive ruler, and it was he who made a
beginning of the empire by conquering the two neigh-
bouring -stales, the great kingdom of Kosala and the re-
public of Vaisali. To enable him to do so, he built the
strong fort of Pataliputra, near the site of the present
Patna. His grandson Udayin, about 459 B.C., raised a city
round it, and made it the royal residence. Thenceforth it
remained for many centuries the capital of the empire.
With Udayin's successors (about 426-371 B.C.) the
Kshatriya dynasty appears to have come to an end. The
history of its extinction is very obscure ; but one thing
is certain, that the Nanda dynasty (about 371-321 B.C.),
which now came to rule the empire, belonged to the
Sudra caste. We know this from the Greek historians
of Alexander's invasion of India, which took place
towards the end of the Nanda rule.
To that celebrated invasion we must now turn our
attention. From the inscriptions of
Darius Hystaspis, the Achemenian king vasf(frfof India"
of Persia, jve know -that he extended
his empire as far as the Indus. This appears to have
24 • HISTORY OF INDIA.
happened about 512 B.C. The province, or satrapy of
the Indus Valley was considered the richest and most
populous possession of the Persian empire. It was, no
doubt, this part which induced Alexander the Great, after
he had overthrown the Persian empire; to attempt to
push the limits of his own Macedonian empire still
farther into India.
He crossed the Indus iii the spring of ^26 B.C. at
Ohind, not far north of the modern Attock. The
country between the Indus and Jehlum peacefully sub-
mitted. There the Greeks, for the first time, saw the
Brahman Yogis, whose ascetic practices and strange
doctrines caused them much astonishment. Between
the Jehlum and the Chenab lay the country of the
Pauravas. Their king, called Poros by the Greeks, was
the first to offer a stout resistance to the mvader ; but
he was totally defeated in a great battle, fought at
Jehlum, on the left bank of the river of the same name.
After this victory, Alexander met with no serious oppo-
sition, till he reached the fortified town of Sangala, pro-
bably not far from Amritsar. This was the capital of
the Kathaeans, or Kathis as they are now called, who
formed a kind of republic. With some difficulty the
town was captured, after which Alexander continued
his march eastward to the right bank of the Bias. Here
his further progress towards the panges was arrested
through the opposition of his own Macedonian troops.
They had heard of the existence of a formidable
"Eastern" power, which was preparing to bar their
progress. This was the MagadbjL^jnjHie of the Nandas.
So, being already worn'ourwTth the fatigues of a long
campaign and the hardships of the Indian climate, they
refused to march any farther. Alexander, after fruitless
attempts to turn them from their purpose, was obliged
to retrace his steps to the Jehlum. There he embarked
on a fleet and sailed down to the mouth of the Indus.
On the way he c<iptured the fortified capital- of the
Malloi, or Malava, tribe, somewhere north-east of
CH. v.] the early BUDDHIST PERIOD. 25
Multan, and subdued the principalities on both sides of
the old course of the Lower Indus.* Thus he had now
completed the conquest of Sindh as well as of the
Punjab. In order to secure his hold on these two pro-
vinces, he found-
ed several new
cities, or rather
fortifie'd Greek
settlements — a-
them
Alex-
mong
Nicaea,
andria,
Patala,
Indian Silver Coin of Alexander.
and
in the
upper and lower
Punjab, and in
Sindh respect-
ively. Having thus, as lie thought, firmly established
his conquests, he marched back to Persia. But his
expectations were not realized. On the civilization of
India, his invasion left practically no mark ; for what-
ever foreign element there appears in the institutions or
manners of the succeeding Mauryan empire, such as the
title of Satrap (Kshatrapa), is Persian rather than Greek.
Politically, at any rate, his conquest did not endure.
Poros had been taken prisoner in the great battle
on the Jehlum ; but Alexander, who ad-
mired his personal bravery, had appoint- Empira!"''"^^
ed him civil administrator in the Punjab
under the Greek Governor Philip. In 323 B.C., Poros
was treacherously slain by Philip's successor, Eudemos.
This murder provoked a national revolt, which was
headed by a young adventurer, called Chandra Gupta
Maurya. " He succeeded in putting an_end_la.thp Greek
^domination, and in making himself the ruler of the
^PunjaF^d Sindh. He was a native of Magadha, and
^The old course of the Indus and its tributaries is shown r
Map II. The present course and coast-line are indicated by d '-
D
26
HISTORY OF INDIA
a distant connection of the Nanda dynasty ; but having
quarrelled with his royal relatives, he had been obliged
to flee for safety to Greek territory. Having now ex-
pelled the Greeks and acquired some power, he deter-
mined to revenge himself and conquer the kingdom of
Magadha. In this enterprise he easily succeeded ; for
the Naudas were detested on account of their tyranny.
In 321 B.C., he captured the capital Pataliputra, and de-
posing the Nandas, he became the founder of the famous
Maurya dynasty. Soon afterwards, about 305 B.C., the
Greeks under Seleukos, known as Nikator or the Con-
queror, who had succeeded to the eastern portion of
Alexander's empire,
made an attempt tore-
conquer fhejogt pro-
vinces on the Indus.
But the attempt utter-
ly failed, and the result
was that Seleukos had
to cede to Chandra
Gupta not only the
Punjab and Sindh, but
also Eastern Afghani-
stan. Fortified by
this success, Chandra
Gupta proceeded to
reduce to vassalage
the greater part of
India. We do not
know the details of his
campaigns, but the
result was, that he
built up the First Em-
pire of India, wliich
eventually equalled in
extent the present British Indian Empire, excluding
Burma. It reached its greatest size in the time of his
'•andson, Asoka, who added the east coast to the empire
;g|.
^ ....^.-ri^rsfeaA*!^
-....■
■• " "'•"' "' '■ ' -■■■"■■ • '' -''- " — ^
Asoka's Column.
Ch. v.] the early BUDDHIST PERIOD. 2/
by the conquest of the kingdom of Kalinga, that is,
Orissa and the Circars. Asoka had the habit of
causing his " Edicts/' as they are called, to be engraved
on boulders, or on columns of stone, or in caves, all
over the empire. Many of these still exist, and are
witnesses to the wide extent of the Maurya Empire.
They are found on the right side of the Indus, in the
middle of Mysore, on the east coast near Ganjam, and
in the Nepalese Terai, north of Basti. They prove that
the Maurya Empire embraced the whole of India,
approximately down to Madras, as well as Eastern
Afghanistan.
Asoka ascended the throne in 2"] 2 B.C., but, appa-
rently his succession being disputed by
an elder brother, he was not formally Asoka's Reign,
crowned till four years later. He began
his rule in the spirit of his grandfather, Chandra Gupta,
by the conquest of Kalinga. But the horrors of that
war, and the admonitions of Buddhist monks made
such an impression on his mind as to cause an entire
change of character. He even went, towards the end
of his reign, so far as to become a Buddhist monk. He
also now adopted the new name Piyadassi, or the
Gracious, by which he calls himself in his Edicts. For
the remainder of his reign, which is said to have lasted
altogether 41 years (272-231 B.C.), he became one of
the most benificent rulers that India has seen. His
Edicts give us a vivid picture of the care which he bes-
towed on the administration of his empire. He planted
trees along the roads, dug wells and canals for irrigation,
built rest-houses for travellers and hospitals for the sick,
and held regular assemblies at intervals of three or five
years for the proper instruction of his officials. He
maintained a special staff of high officers to watch over
the interests of the poor and the aged, to mitigate the
severity of the criminal laws, and to restrain the exces-
sive destruction of animal life. With regard to the last
point he set a personal example by abolishing the
2S
HISTORY OF INDIA.
customary royal hunting parties and replacing them by
pilgrimages. In one of these pilgrimages, twenty years
after his coronation, he visited the birthplace of Buddha
at Rummin Dei in the Nepalese Terai, and there set up,
in commemoration ol his visit, an inscribed stone pillar,
which still exists, to mark the spot where Buddlia was
born. The propagation of Buddhism was a particular
object oi" his solicitude. He sent missionaries not only
into the remoter
parts of his empire,
such as Gujarat, Af-
ghanistan, Kashmir
and Nepal, but also
into the independent
kingdoms of South
India, and to Ceylon.
In the latter country,
Asoka's son, or, ac-
cording to another
tradition, his young-
er brother, Mahen-
dra, is said to have
introduced B u d d-
hism. It is not im-
probable that but for
Asoka's missionary
efforts. Buddhism
would never have
spread much beyond
the limits of Maga-
dha, nor have become
one of the most
wide- spread religions
of the world,
excellent policy appears to have been
continued by his grandson, Dasaratha.
This we ma}' perhaps conclude h'om his
inscriptions that still exist carved on the
View of Rummin Dei and the Asoka Column
Asoka's
Asoka's
Successors.
Ch. v.] the early BUDDHIST PERIOD. 29
walls of the Nagarjuni Caves near Gaya, which he
caused to be constructed for the benefit of the Ajivika
(a sect of Jain) monks. Bul after him the dynasty
rapidly declined, and after another three or four feeble
reigns, Brihadratha, the last of the Mauryas, was dethron-
ed by his rebellious general, Pushyamitra, who founded
the Sunga dynasty. This happened about 185 B.C.
A point of particular interest with regard to Asoka
is thatin the 13th of his Rock-edicts,he fa •
names five Greek kings as contempor- ind\?n° Histopy!
aries of himself One of them is Antio-
chusTheos, king of Syria, who was a grandson of Seleukos
Nikator, the contemporary of Asoka's grandfather,
Chandra Gupta. It is this double synchronism which has
enabled us, with the help of the Greek dates which are
well-known, to fix, in the otherwise undated history of
ancient India, acentral date from which we can calculate
approximately, backwards and forwards, the dates of
many other important events.
The foundation of the First Indiimjlm^e of the
Mauryas was only one of the two great
events of this period. The other was the J^^ , J?^^® °^ .
c ^x ^ ^ u- ^ Buddhism and
rise 01 the two great monastic systems jainism.
known as Buddhism and Jainism. It has
already been shown in the account of the preceding
period that there existed small groups of men who,
dissatisfied with the popular religion of polytheism and
sacrifice, had withdrawn from the world to devote them-
selves to a monastic life of religious speculation. Such
speculation was at first closely connected with the study
of the Vedas. Hence, naturally, the men who adopted
the monastic life were mostly drawn from the Brahman
caste who were the guardians of the Vedic lore. But as
yet they lived by themselves or in small independent
groups. There was no general organization or "Order"
to which all these Brahraanic monks belonged. The
innovaPion, introduced by the founders of Buddhism and
Jainism, consisted just in these two points : that they
30 HISTORY OF INDIA.
organized all their followers into a regular Society or
Order, and that, being Kshatriyas themselves, they drew
their followers mainly from the Kshatriya and the other
non-Brahmanic classes of the people. They did not
S*efuse to admit Brahmans into their Order, but within it
they rejected all Brahmanic pretensions to superiority.
This policy, no doubt, produced a certain degree of
antagonism between their Societies and the general
brahmanically constituted community around them.
But it is quite erroneous to look upon them as revolts
against the tyranny of caste. They never thought of
rejecting the system of caste as a regulating factor of
the general community outside their own Order.
Siddhartha — better know^n as Gautama — the founder
. of Buddhism, and Mahavira the founder
Jainfs^^^ ^ of Jainism, were scions of princely houses.
They were contemporaries, though Ma-
havira was somewhat older than Gautama and died
some years before him, about 490 B.C., at the age of
seventy-two. Gautama died, eighty years old, about 483
B.c Not much is known of Mahavira's personal history.
He belonged to the Naya or Nata clan of Kshatriyas,
who were settled near the large town of Vaisali, said to
be represented by the village of Besarh, about tw^enty-
seven miles north of Patna. That town was the capital
of a small oligarchical republic, and Mahavira w^as the
younger son of one of its ruling Rajas or chiefs. At the
age of thirty he retired from the world, and joined a
small monastic community of Parsvanath which lived
near Vaisali. From this Society, how^ever, he separated
after two years, in order to establish another of his own
with more stringent rules of conduct. In a long wander-
ing life of forty-two years he succeeded in gathering a
considerable following of monks in the principal towns
of North and South Bihar. At first they were known
as the Nirgranthas^ or men who have discarded all
social bonds ; but after Mahavira's death, whe.j they
spread over the whole of India, they became know^n as
Ch. v.] the early BUDDHIST PERIOD. 31
>aaLa>UJiilUlWXl the Jains. Under that
name they still exist in
.1. ivi jii*.*! JL I -, I .toil J various parts of India.
HXU/^aSta dl»fDU ^tni Mahavira claimed
to be a /ma or
C^i^^r^/^-fStk^^Otfd mCd). Spiritii^l Conqner-_
or, just as Gautama"
{^>(ff^i\l!. t'<^^li L o-i/^"*"C claimed to be a
HO/X-ld
BiiddhojOr^ Rnlight-
ened One. Hence
their respective fol-
Asoka Inscription on the Column at lowers are kuOVVn aS
Rummin Dei. the Jaius and the
Bauddhas or Buddists.
Gautama belonged to the Sakyas, one of the
proudest of the Kshatriya clans. This
clan was settled in a small territory Life of Buddha.
between the upper Rapti and the Gan-
dak. Its capital was Kapilavastu, which stood on the
site of the present village of Piprahva, in the north-east-
ern corner of the Basti district in the United Provinces
of Agra and Oudh. The actual spot where Gautama
was born was the Lumbini Park, about six miles north-
east of Kapilavastu, in the Nepalese Terai. It is now
called Rummin Dei, and is marked by a still-existing,
inscribed column erected by Asoka. He was born as
the eldest son of Suddhodana, the Raja or chief of the
Sakya clan. As heir to the chieftainship and the son of
a wealthy family, he was provided with everything that
man could wish to make him happy. But Gautama
was naturally of an observant ar.^ thoughtful disposi-
tion. The sight of so much decay and sufferingjjTOund
hirn_escited his~ compassion, and set him thinking how
the ills j)Mjfe^m£ht_be_cure3^ PTe cared more for
meditation in solitude, than for the youthful sports of
his prin^ly companions. His father, who was afraid
of his monkish predilections, married him to a fair and
loving Sakya princess ; but this bond had no permanent
32
HISTORY OF INDIA.
effect on Gautama. When he was twenty-nine years
old — soon after a son had been born to him, and thus
the succession had been secured — lie finally resolved, in
'^V'^ spite ot the tears and entreaties of wife and father, to
' ^», renounce his position and his home, and to adopt a
monk's vocation. He went to North Bihar, where he
attached himself successively to two Brahman ascetics
renowned for their wisdom. Their teaching, however,
did not satisfy him ; and now he commenced a seven
years' life of wandering and severe asceticism, in the
hope of discovering the truth regarding the cure of the
ills of life. His austerities gradually reduced him almost
to a skeleton, and brought him to death's door. But
they did not give him the knowledge he sought, and
the conviction was forced on him that he was on a false
track ; so he returned to a reasonable mode of life.
Then at the end of the seventh year, when he was
thirty-six years old, one night as he sat under a pipal
tree in the neighbourhood of Gaya,
absorbed in solitary meditation,
there suddenly came to him, like a
revelation, the solution of his prob-
lem. We shall see presently what
that solution was. In the mean-
time, let us follow him, as over-
joyed by his discovery he rose up^
took food and drink, and spent a
month in the recovery of his
strength. Then he set out to pro-
K_ -y^-'^^i^ claim to the world the great revela-
f- ■iie^^^^w^ tion which he had received. But
, before doingso, he had to overcome
a great temptation, suggested, as
he thought, by Mara, or the Evil
(From an andeiit uuiptutc) One. The cxaltatiou causcd by his
discovery was naturally followed
by a reaction of despondency and doubt as to wfiether
he should ever be able to persuade his fellowmen of its
Buddha under the Tree.
Ch. v.] the early BUDDHIST PERIOD.
33
reality. But with his returning bodily strength, the
temptation gave way to an abiding confidence in the
success of his missionary enterprise. The first place
which he visited was Benares. Here he secured his first
disciples, and founded his Society, or "Order" of monks.
Thence he wandered up and down the country, from
town to town, and village to village, through the whole
of South and north Bihar, and as far as his native Sakya
country. In this way he went on for forty-four years,
wandering and preaching ; and his Order grew apace in
number^;. At last he~died, eighty years old, in Kusinagara
about 483 B.C. His body was cremated with much cere-
mony, and his relics were distributed among his adher-
ents. His princely Sakya relatives carried their share—
a few bits of bone— to Kapilavastu, where they enclosed
it in a stone box, and built over it a huge slupa or pyra-
midal monument. This is the Piprahva Stupa, the ruins
of which still exist, and there Buddha's bones have re-
cently been brought to light in their stone box.
» A
<^^V^lK_i
^
-v^.j^Bh^lh
HL
■''■''■.-•'.»->'>.--'-■.■■■ -■ :-' l^"ii^ - '' ^'iNri^BlJB
View of the oldest Stupa at Sanchi.
But 'what was Buddha's great discovery ? We shall
try briefly to explain it. We have seen how sensitive
34 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Gautama was to the misery which he
Doeo'ine! ^^^^' everywhere around him ; the labour
and oppression of the poor, the rivalries
and disappointments of the rich ; sickness, old age and
death for all. It was not merely the physical suffering
that moved him, but even more the mental suffering of
men. " Whence comes all this misery ?" he asked himself;
and his reply was : " All men strive after an enjoyable life,
and in the universal struggle for it they cannot but hurt
one another ; no one can secure the good things of this
world but at the expense of others ; hence comes the
general misery." " But how can this evil be remedied ?"
So Gautama asked next. Several replies were possible.
The ordinary man said : "Death will end man's misery
and bring him peace." "Not so," objected Buddhaj_^r
there is the transmigration of souls ca.useijr^j^arma,
or the acts, good or bad, of one's life. When a man-
dies, he is only re-born into another life of misery ;
and so onwards without end." Here comes in that
belief in transmigration which had grown up in the
preceding period, and in which Gautama as firmly be-_
lieved as did all his contemporaries. But there was
another reply given by the Brahmanical monks. They
said that a man's misery is caused only by his ignorance.
If he once comes to understand that the whole visible
world is but an illusion, and that he himself is really one
with God or the World-Soul who exists in perfect happi-~
ness, then his misery disappears. This is the reply
which Gautama received from the two Brahmanical
teachers to whom he first applied for enhghtenment. It
did not satisfy him ; it seemed to him rather a mockery.
For whatever he might tki7ik about the reality of the
world, he could not help feeling the reality of the
misery of life. So Gautama went in search of a truer
r^ reply. At last he found one ; and it was a very simple
a reply. It was this: "Seeing that the misery of life is
\\ caused by man's striving after the good things of this
\ j life, let him give up that striving, and then he will have
Ch. v.] the early BUDDHIST PERIOD. 35
peace." Gautama tried this remedy in his own case,
and he found that it was true. He knew the secret of
deliverance. He now was Buddha, thaTisr'^^r^gktgagdv^'
BiiOtiere' still leuralnHTaTourth questTOTr"r**How is rnarr
to give up the striving after the good things of life ?"
Buddha replied : " He can do so by self-discipline ; he
must train himsell to it by beirTg right iiTthe following
eight points : — In belief and desire, in speech and act, /
in life and work, in feeling and thougHf." In short,-there I
is enough in the world to satisfy all ; therefore, let a man \
exercise self-denial, contentment, and consideration for j
others. Living thus, he will attain peace," or JSliyva?ia,
aFBuddha called it. It will thus be seen that BuddHa'S
system was a thoroughly practical one ; not one of
religion, but of morality. It was summed up by him in
the so-called "Four Truths,'' and the "Eightfold Path,"
above explained. No doubt, his system had also under
its surface deeper thoughts which were summed up in
the so-called "Chain of Twelve Causes." But this
philosophy was taught by him only to his more advanc-
ed disciples, and it need not detain us here. It will now
be understood that Buddha did not mean to teach a
new religion in opposition to the prevailing popular
Brahmanism. What he wanted to do wasJ:o found a >
Society__of men who should take a vow t^practise a.
righteous life^ such as he conceived it. That character
of "a JVlonastic Order his Society retained in India for
many centuries. Gradually, as his teaching spread to
peoples who were not Indians, a kind of deification of
Buddha sprang up, and his system turned into a popular^
religion. This, however, is a development wBfch took
place in the succeeding period, as will be explained in
Chapter VI.
Up to the time of Asoka the Buddhist Order was
practically confined to Bihar, outside of c v •
which Brahmanism prevailed. But Language
through She missionary efforts of Asoka,
after his conversion to Buddhism, the latter faith spread
36 HISTORY OF INDIA.
over the whole of India. A few words may be said
here regarding the condition of Indian civihzation under
the Brahmanic influence. One of the most striking
points is the use ofSanskrit as a hterary language,
distinct from the "older language of tITe~Yedas, and the
upgrowth of a Sanskrit Literature. We have seen in the
preceding period that the study of the Vedas was the
special function of_the_Brahmans. Now, the Vedas could
not be studied without a knowledge ot grammar. Thus
teachers of grammar arose in the Brahmanic schools,
who laid down rules as to what was to be considered
the correct form of their language. The most successful
among these teachers was a grammarian named Panini,
who probably lived about 350 B.C. He wrote a text-
book, called the Ashtadhyayi, that is, the book of eight
chapters. It superseded all other text-books on grammar,
and thenceforth no book was considered as written in
Sanskrit, that is, in "refined" or "correct" language,
unless it conformed to his rules. For some centuries,
however, Sanskrit remained the exclusive property of
the Brahmanic schools. Outside these schools, in the
king's offices, and in the schools of the Buddhist and
Jain monastic Orders, the language spoken by the people
of the country was used for literary purposes. Thus
most of the Edicts of Asoka are written in the popular
language of Magadha, commonly called Pali or Prakrit.
So also are the early Sacred Books of the Buddhists and
the Jains. It was only in the course of the next period
that Sanskrit was generally adopted as the language of
all public and private records.
Though the art of writing, as we shall see, was not
unknown in this period, it was not yet
if^rature admitted as a means of instruction in the
Brahmanic schools. Everything was
done by memory. But by this time the details in ritual
and custom, preserved in the Brahmanas and in floating
tradition, had grown to such enormous dimensions, that
memory, unaided, was unequal to the task ot master-
Ch. V] THE EARLY BUDDHIST PERIOD. 37
ing them. Hence it became customary in the schools
to compile short Manuals, called Siilras. They are so
famous for their excessive conciseness that the whole
period has sometimes been called the Sutra Period.
Such manuals were compiled for every department of
knowledge which was taught at that time. Thus we
have the Srauta Sutras or Manuals for performing Sacri-
fices ; the Grihya Sutras, or Manuals of Domestic Rites;
the Dharma Sutras, or Manuals of Civil and Criminal
Law. We have also a Sutra on Astronomy; and Panini's
Grammar itself is a Sutra. The whole of this technical
literature came to be known by the name of Smriti, or
Tradition, to distinguish it from the literature of the
preceding period which was looked upon as Sruti, or
Revelation But "light literature" was not neglected
by the Brahmans. It was in this period that the scat-
tered legends and ballads, which described stirring
incidents of the early history of the Indo-Aryans, were
collected to form the two celebrated epic poems, the
Mahabharata and the Ramayana. By the side of this
Brahmanic literature there gradually grew up a large
body of Buddhist and Jain literature which dealt with
the peculiar beliefs and practices of those two monastic
Orders. That of the Buddhists is known by the collective
name of the Tripitaka, or Three Baskets, while the sacred
books of the Jains are called Againas, or Traditions.
All this literature enables us to form a fairly accurate
idea of the religious, social and intel- .
lectual condition of the people at this condition,
period. Forthe time of the great Maurya
Empire especially we have also the witness of Asoka's
inscriptions and of the reports of Megasthenes. The
latter was a Greek who resided for several years in Patali-
putra as the ambassador of Seleukos, a Greek king, to
the court of Chandra Gupta. From these sources we
know that the Brahmanical system of caste was at this
time flourishing throughout India. It governed not only
the social relations of the people, but also the civil and
^S HISTORY OF INDIA.
criminal administration of the country. The different
castes were differently taxed. The criminal laws were
cruelly severe, but the penalties were lightened in propor-
tion to the offender's caste. The general government
of the country was a pure autocracy of the king or
emperor, more or less tempered by respect for the cus-
tomary Brahmanical laws, or by (ear of the ruling classes,
or, as in the case of Asoka, by natural kindness of heart.
As to the popular rehgion, the people were divided
mainly into the great sections of the Vaishnavas and
Saivas. By the side of the Brahmanical schools there
existed numerous individuals or groups of men, devoting
themselves to religious speculation and ascetic practices.
Their object was the same as that of Gautama Buddha —
to find a way of salvation. But they searched for it in
opposite directions. Some were followers of the so-
called Vedania, and their speculations were theistic,
while the others followed the so-called Sankhya, which
was a kind of atheistic speculation. Both also practised
Yoga, or ascetic exercises, by which they thought their
minds became better fitted for contemplation. But at
this time these philosophies had not yet formed regular
Schools. Hence there did not yet exist any philoso-
phical Sutras, or Manuals. The earliest known manual
of this kind is the Voga Sutra, composed by Patanjali,
quite at the end of the period, about 150 B.C.
In educational matters there was considerable activ-
ity. The Brahmanical schools formed
Education and something like Universities, where the
'/" wHtin^^^ °^ Vedas, or Theology, Law, Medicine,
i/ wpiung. ' J 4.1
Grammar, Astronomy, and many other
sciences were taught. Among these Universities the
most celebrated was that of Taxila, in the Punjab. It
was frequented by young men from Benares and other
distant parts of India. The number of these Universities
was limited, but by their side there existed numerous
elementary schools in all towns They were kept
by Brahmans for the benefit, principally, of the mer-
Ch. V.
THE EARLY BUDDHIST PERIOD.
39
cantile and land-holding classes. The subjects taught in
them were Writing, Arithmetic and Account-keeping.
The_ art oL-WTiting had been introduced into India
towards the end of the preceding period, probably about
600 B.C. At that time a maritime trade was carried on
from Broach and other ancient ports in the Gulf of
Cambay, above Bombay, through the Persian Gulf to
Babylonia. In that trade an early form of the Aramaean
script was used. This, no doubt, the Indian mariners
learned and brought with them to their Indian home.
Here it was taken up by the Brahmans who kept the
elementary schools.
In their hands it un-
derwent considerable
alterations to suit the
requirements of the
Indo-Aryan langu-
age ; and thus it be-
came an entirely new
kind of writing, which
is known as the
Brahmi. It was pri-
marily made in the
interest of the Indian
merchants and their
inland trade. Through
them the knowledge
of it was gradually
diffused throughout
the length and
breadth of the coun-
try. Atthe beginning
of the fifth century
B.C. it was already
known as far north
as the Nepalese Irontier ; for the oldest known Brahmi
inscription has been found on the box in which Buddha's
bones were buried by his Sakya relatives in the Piprahva
Inscribed Casket of Buddha's Relics.
40
HISTORY OF INDIA.
Stupa, about 483 B.C. About two centuries later (260-240
B.C.) we find the Brahmi script in general use throughout
India, as shown by the Edicts of Asoka. At this time,
however, we find also an alternative script in use in the
north-western frontier provinces of Asoka's empire.
This kind of writing, which is now known as the
Kharoshthi, is only a slight modification of its Aramaean
original ; but being rather unsuited to the Indo-Aryan
language, it soon fell into disuse, and was entirely for-
gotten. On the other hand, the Brahmi, which is a truly
Indian invention, maintained its ground, and has become
the parent of all the varying scripts which, at the present
day, are current in India.
CHAPTER VI.
The Later Buddhist Period :
The Parthian and Turki Invasions, and the
New Buddhism.
About B.C. ISO — A.D. 300.
THE preceding chapter has brought us down to the
end of the First Indian Empire
about 185 B.C. During the whole of the ifemaS^''^
period which we shall now consider,
India was politically in a very perturbed condition, and
the exact sequence of events is, to some extent, still
uncertain. The causes of the troubles were partly internal
dissensions, and partly foreign invasions. The foreign
invaders, this time, did not come from Europe, but from
Central Asia, and belonged to two different races, the
Parthian, and the Turki, or, as it is often called, Scythian.
It was not till the beginning of the next period that India
was once more united in the Second Empire of the
Guptas, which, in extent, nearly equalled the First Empire.
What the causes of the internal dissensions were
we do not exactly know. One principal Causes of the
cause appears to have been the anta- Disruption of
gonism of Brahmanism to Buddhism the First Em-
and Jainism. For Pushyamitra, the P^''®*
founder of the Sunga dynasty, is said to have been a
bitter persecutor of the Buddhists, who, as we have seen,
were much favoured by the Maurya dynasty. The
general dii^satisfaction, thus created, soon led to the
disruption of the empire. The outlying provinces on
the east, south, west, and north-west separated, and
formed themselves into independent kingdoms, so that
practically only the central portion, Bihar and Oudh,
remained to the Imperial dynasty.
42 HISTORY OF INDIA.
The immediate cause of the disruption appears to
have been a difference between Agnimitra
The Indepen- and Yajnasena Satakarni. The former
K^ U^na-a ^ was a son of Pushyamitra, and, as viceroy,
administered the western province of
Malwa. The latter was the governor, or feudatory, of
the southern provinces of Vidarbha and Andhra, that is
the present Central Provinces, Berar, and Haidarabad.
The territories of the two governors adjoined each other,
and an ill-considered attempt at a matrimonial alliance
on the part of Agnimitra led to a war between them.
In this war Satakarni was unsuccessful ; and it was pro-
bably with the object of retrieving his failure thai, in
1 68 B.C., he went with a large army to the assistance of
his eastern neighbour Kharavela, the feudatory king of
Kalinga, that is, Orissa and the Circars. Kharavela was
a devoted Jain, and possibly that may have been the
cause which brought him into warlike collision with his
suzerain, the Sunga emperor, Pushyamitra. In this war,
by a successful expedition into the very heart of the
empire, which led him to the capital Pataliputra on the
banks of the Ganges, Kharavela compelled the emperor
to sue for peace and acknowledge his independence.
We know all this from an inscription of Kharavela, in-
cised by him, in 157 B.C., on a rock in the Udaigiri hills,
near Cuttack.
In the meanwhile, the fortunes of the empire had
been equally disastrous on the extreme
The Grseeo-Bae- north-western frontier. About the
tpian conquest of events in this region we have the con-
Nopth-Western^ temporary evidence of numerous coins,
Provinces. and of the celebrated grammarian,
Patanjali. It appears that about 180
B.C., Demetrios, the Grecian king of Bactria, or Western
Turkestan, had invaded and conquered the two north-
western provinces, Afghanistan and the Punjab. About 185
B.C. they were wrested from him by a rival called Eukrati-
des. At the same time, another Grasco-Bactrian prince,
Ch. VI.] THE LATER BUDDHIST PERIOD. 43
Menander, or Milinda, as he^was called in India, invaded the
province of Sindh. The immediate cause of his attack
appears to have been a difference with the Sunga governor,
Vasumitra, concerning a horse. In order to celebrate the
success of Agnimitra in the war with the allied governors
of Andhra and Kalinga, it appears that his father Pushya-
mitra wanted to perform the great Asvamedha or "horse-
sacrifice." The horse for this solemnity was to be sup-
plied by Agnimitra's son, Vasumitra, who was the
governor of Sindh, and the quarrel with Menander some-
how arose on this account. Menander not only conquered
Sindh, but the adjoining western provinces of Gujarat
and Malwa. He carried his victorious arms even as far
as Ayodhya in Oudh, to which he laid siege, and Sakala,
near Amritsar, in the Western Punjab. Thus he built up
a very widely extended dominion, over which he appears
to have ruled for many years, down to about 130 B.C.
In the meantime there had appeared on the borders
of India a formidable foe who soon over-
threw the whole of the Grseco-Bactrian invasion^^
kingdoms. These were the Sakas, a sec-
tion of the great Turki, or Scythian, race. Their original
settlements had been in Eastern Turkestan. Thence
they were driven out, about 160 B.C., by the so-called
Yuechi, another section of the same race. They migrat-
ed to India, probably across the passes of the Karako-
rum Range, and through the valleys of the Indus.
Having reached India, one portion marched west irito
Afghanistan, conquering the numerous small Gneco-
Bactrian sovereignties which had established themselves
after Eukratides' death, under Strato, Lysias, and other
princes. They chiefly settled in the western part of
Afghanistan, which hence came to be called Sakasthayia,
or the country of the Sakas, being the modern Seistan.
The best known of their kings, about 90 B.C., was
Azes. The other portion of the invading Sakas occupied
the Punjab, and gradually extended their conquest over
the whole of the territory once belonging to Menander,
44
HISTORY OF INDIA.
/
i.e., Sindh, Gujrat and Malwa. Each of these provinces
was ruled by a governor, or Kshatrapa (Satrap), as he
was called. From two inscriptions of Shodasa, the
Satrap of Mathura, and Liaka, the Satrap of Taxila
(Shah Dheri in the Punjab), we know that, about no
B.C., this portion of the Sakas was ruled by a king called
Mogas or Maues.
We have now followed the fortunes of the Sunga_
Empire down to about loo B.C., and
The Revolt of traced its extensive losses in the east^
Ex?inc?ion"of Si ^^'^^V and north-west. Not long after-
First Empire. wards it lost also its great southern
province of Andhra, now represented
by the Central Provinces, Berar and Haidarabrid. From
the very confused account of the Puranas, when fairly
construed, it appears that, about 117 B.C., a Simgabhri-
tya, or minister of the Sunga emperor, Vasudeva
by name, who was a Brahman of the Kanva family,
usurped the imperial power. For forty-five years he
and his descendants, known as the Kanvayana dynasty,
ruled the empire, just like the Peshwas in later times,
while the members of the Sunga dynasty continued to
be the nominal sovereigns. The establishment of this
Brahman rule apparently only served to intensify the
prevailing sectarian animosity. Anyhow, about 73 B.C.,
the governor of the Andhra province, called simply
Satakarni, revolted. He subverted both the actual
Kanvayana and the nomial Sunga dynasties (about 117-
j-i, and 135-73 B.C., respectively), and himself seized
the paramount power. With this event the First
Indian Empire became extinct. The central portion,
Bihar and Oudh, now sank to the position of an insigni-
ficant province, while in the west, south, and east res-
pectively, the great kingdoms of the Sakas, Andhras,
and Kalingas took its place. Of the subsequent fortunes
of theceniral portion nothing definite is known until the
rise of the Second Indian Empire of the Guptas in tha
next period. From the confused account in the Fnranas
Ch. VI. ] THE LATER BUDDHIST PERIOD. 45
only this much may be concluded, that the unhappy
country was torn by a succession of ijiternal rrmfestg^f
jTvaliaC-tions belonging to different castes and tribes. Of
the fortunes of the Kalinga kingdom also nothing is known
for manv centuries, till about 6io A.D., when we find it
ruled by Indravarman of the Ganga dynasty.
Let us now return to the history of the Saka
kingdom. We have seen that it was
divided into a number of "Satrapies," The Parthian
subject to a paramount sovereign who the^^'vikr^ma
called himself the " King of Kings." Era.
On the west it was adjoined by the
Parthian kingdom, which at that time was in a state of
great political disorder. The exact cause of the occur-
rence we do not know, but from extant coins it appears
that, about 60 B.C., Arsaces Theos, or the Divine, a scion
of the Arsacide dynasty of Parthia, invaded the Saka
territory. To meet this attack the Sakas had naturally
to withdraw their forces from the eastern parts of their
kingdom. The opportunity, thus created, was utilized
by the warlike clans of the Malavas to combine and rise
against their Saka satrap. A great battle was fought by
them, as it is said, at Karor in the Punjab, in which the
Sakas were totally defeated. This was in 57 B c, and
it is most probably from this epoch of the Malava rising
against the Saka rule that the Malava or, as it is now
called, the Vikrama era dates. It has received the latter
name from a king, Vikramaditya, who, as we shall see
in the next period, also achieved at the head of the
Malava clans, a great victory over the Huns about A.D.
525. The Saka kingdom, which was thus attacked both
in the east and west, fell to pieces. In its place arose the
Indo-Parthian kingdom, which, however, itself enjoyed
but a very short period of existence. This kingdom reach-
ed the zenith of its power and extent under Gondophares,
whose long reign, according to a still-existing inscription,
began a6out 20 a.d. But not very long after him, it was
overthrown bv the second Turki invasion of the Kushanas.
46 HISTORY OF INDIA.
We have seen that about i6o B.C., the Sakas were
driven out of their original settlements
The Kushana in Eastern Turkestan by the Yuechi,
the^aka Era"'^ another section of the same Turki race.
The Yuechi, in their turn, were expelled
by the Uighur, or Usun, a third section of that race, and
migrated into Western Turkestan, which they gradually
occupied in force on both sides of the Oxus. The
Yuechi were divided into five tribes, the principal of
which was the Kushana. About 60 a.d., the chief of the
latter, Kadphises I, having united the five tribes into one
kingdom, proceeded to conquer Afghanistan, and then
to attack the Indo-Parthian kingdom of India. The
troubles thus created in that kingdom, were utilized by
its Saka satraps in Gujarat for the assertion of their own
independence. This was in 78 A.D., and it is probably
from this event that the so-called Saka era dates.
Kadphises I eventually succeeded in overthrowing the
Indo-Parthian kingdom, and in establishing in its place
the Kushana empire. Of India, however, that empire
never included much more than the Punjab and Kashmir,
while its larger portion lay outside India ; for this reason
it cannot strictly be classed as an Indian empire. Its
widest extent was reached under Kanishka, who, as the
consensus of numismatic, epigraphic, literary and other
evidences renders ver)' probable, came to the throne
about 125 A.D. He
added Kashmir to the
empire, and pushed its
Indian frontier as far
as Mathura. He be-
came also a convert
to Buddhism, and in
commemoration of
the fact struck medals
Kanishka's Gold Coin of Buddha. bearing Buddha's
efifigy. About 152
A.D., Kanishka was succeeded by Huvishka, and he by
Ch. VI.] THE LATER BUDDHIST PERIOD. 47
Vasudeva. Their combined reigns, both of which were
very long, lasted down to about 225 a.d. The subse-
quent course of events is not well known, but this much
is certain that the Kushana Empire gradually broke up.
This was due, at first, probably to invasions of the new
Sassanian dynasty of Persia, which was founded in 226
A.D., and finally to the conquests of the Second Indian
Empire of the Guptas, which arose in the next period.
The confederacy of the Malava clans, as we have
seen, succeeded in throwing off the Saka
yoke in 57 B.C. They appear, as we Sla^'lltpapy^
know from their coins, to have preserved
their independence for nearly 200 years. But in Gujarat
the Saka rule does not appear to have ever been entirely
subverted. On the contary, the satraps of that province
continued to rule in dependence on the Indo-Parthian
" King of Kings" and, as we have seen, they succeeded
in establishing their independence in 78 A.D., during the
last struggles of those kings with the Kushana invaders.
We know from certain inscriptions that in 119 a.d.,
Gujarat was ruled by an independent Saka satrap, called
Nahapana, who had included Malwa, with its capital
Ujain, in his dominions. About 124 a.d., he was de-
feated by the Andhra king, Gautamiputra. The victor
annexed Malwa, and placed it in charge of another Saka
Chief, called Chashtana, who is mentioned by the cele-
brated contemporary Greek geographer, Ptolemy, about
139 A.D., as ruling in Ujain under the name of Tiastenes.
He took possession also of Gujarat and founded a new
dynasty, the members of which afterwards adopted the
title oi Maha-kshatrapa, and are commonly known as the
" Western Satraps." The third of this dynasty, Rudra-
daman, who had married a daughter of the Andhra king
Pulomavi II, quarrelled with his father-in-law, made
himself independent, and re-established the " Great
Satrapy" or kingdom of Saurashtra, which included both
Malwa and Gujarat. On the rock of Junagarh, which
bears an inscription of Asoka, he proudly added one of
48 HISTORY OF INDIA.
his own, in 150 a.d., in which he records his pohtical
achievements as well as his works of pubh'c utihty. His
dynasty, which by this time had become thoroughly
Indianised, comprised twenty-seven members, all but the
first bearing Indian names. The last of them, called
Rudrasnnha, reigned well into the next period, down to
about 395 A.D., when the " Great Satrapy " was annexed
to the Second Indian Empire by Chandra Gupta II.
In the beginning of its existence the "Great Satrapy"
had to figlit repeatedly for its indepen-
The King-dom of dence against a formidable foe on its
and thl^^KaS eastern frontier. Here lay the great
ehuri Epa. kingdom of the Andhras. The origin
of this kingdom is still imperfectly
known. It appears tiiat at the time of the Maurya
empire, the southern portion of the latter, lying between
the Narbada and the Kistna, was in the occupation of
three peoples, the Rathiyas (or Rashtrikas), Satiyas, and
Andhras, in its western, northern and eastern parts res-
pectively. The chiefs among the Rathiyas were called
Maharathivas, and from them their country took the
name of Maharashtra But while their country, as well
as that of the Satiyas, had become so thoroughly
aryanized that they had adopted the Aryan language
(Marathi) of their rulers, the eastern portion, ruled by
the Andhra chiefs, had remained, as we saw in Chapter
V, partially Dravidian, and had retained its Telugu
language. These Andhra chiefs had their capital at
Dharnikot, near the mouth of the Kistna, and, as early
as 300 B.C., as we know from the reports of Megas-
thenes, ruled a powerful kingdom. Later, as we know
from Asoka's Edicts, their country formed the southern
province of the Maurya Empire. With the decline of that
empire, about 200 B c, Simuka, the Governor or Viceroy
of the Andhra province, assumed a practically indepen-
dent position, and founded the Andhra dynasty. He and
his brother Krishna even extended their rule westward
and northward over North Maratha and Eastern Malwa.
Ch. VI] THE LATER BUDDHIST PERIOD. 49
His son, Sri Satakarni, the tliird of the dynasty, as we
have seen, in alh'ance with Kharavela, the governor of
Kalinga, about 168 B.C., went to war with the Sunga
emperor Pushyamitra. About j'^ B.C., another Satakarni,
the sixth of the line, slew both the Sunga emperor
Devabhuti and his Brahman minister Susarman, who
had made themselves detested by their depravity.
Having thus put an end to the Sunga and Kanvayana
dynasties, he assumed the paramount power of the em-
pire. Hala, the seventeenth of the dynasty, about 62
A.D., is noteworthy as being the reputed author of the
Sapta-sotaka, or Seven Centuries, the well-known anto-
logy of erotic verses in the Prakrit language. But its
widest extent the Andhra kingdom attained under
Satakarni Gautamiputra, the twenty-third of the dynasty
(about 106-130 A.D.), who, about 124 A. D., defeated the
before-mentioned Nahapana, king of the Great Satrapy,
and added his Gujarat and Malwa provinces to his own
dominions. These now extended right across India from
the eastern to the western coast, and from north of the
Vindhya to Mysore in the south. The new provinces,
however, as previously related, were again lost under
his son Pulomavi II, Vasishtiputra (about 127-155 A.D.),
to Rudradaman, the Great Satrap. Early in his reign,
Pulomavi II seems to have acted at Paithan as viceroy
of his lather, who himself resided at Kolhapur. They
are both mentioned as synchronous rulers (about 127-
130 A.D ) by their contemporary Ptolemy, Alter Pulo-
mavi II the Andhra power gradually declined, till it
came to an end with Pulomavi III. Little is known of
the exact circumstances under which this event occurred.
But it appears that, about 221 A.D., the Andhras were
displaced in their south-western province of Banwasi by
their ministers, known as Andhra-bhrityas, of the Chutu
race, who ruled that province till they were themselves
displaced by the Kadamba chiefs. About the same time
the south-eastern provinces, which had been the original
part of the Andhra kingdom, seem to have passed into
50 HISTORY OF INDIA.
the possession of Pallava chiefs, with their capitals at
Vengi and Kanchipur fConjeveram). The Andhra
dynasty, which still continued to rule in the northern
provinces, was finally extinguished about 249 A.D., by
Isvarasena, an Abhira chief, who founded the Traiku-
taka dynast}'. Hence, that year became the epoch of a
new era, which is now commonly known as the Kala-
churi or Chedi era. The Andhra dynasty, which is
known also as the Satavahana, or Salivahana, comprised
altogether thirty members, who reigned about 49 years
(200 B.C. — 249 A.D.). As to the states into which the
great kingdom of the Andhras was split up, they were
all, as we shall see in the next chapter, brought into
subjection to the Second Empire of the Guptas.
Having traced the political history of India, we must
(^^ now briefly turn our attention to the
General Condi- general condition of the people during
people^ ^^^^ period. Here the most important
event is the complete transformation
of Buddhism from a mere monastic Order into a new,
popular religion. This transformation, in its turn, gradu-
ally changed the whole condition of Indian religion,
society and thought. It finally resulted, as we shall see
in the next period, in that complex form of Indian civil-
ization which is summed up in the term Hinduism.
Primitive Buddhism, as before explained, was a system
of practical ethics, of self-discipline and
Buddhism^ regard for others, superadded to the
ancient religious speculations of the
Brahmans regarding the destiny of man. This two-fold
teaching was the product of Indian thought, and harmon-
ised with the feelings of the Indian people. But when
it came to be propagated among peoples whose mode of
thought and aspirations were entirely different from the
Indian, it necessarily underwent an essential change.
This propagation, we have seen, had begun under Asoka.
His missionaries carried Buddhism into the north-western
provinces of his empire, into the Punjab and Afghanistan.
Ch. VI.] THE LATER BUDDHIST PERIOD. 5I
Here it came into contact with the Grecian culture,
which, since Alexander's invasion, and under his succes-
sors (the Grteco-Bactrian kings), had been in the ascend-
ant in those regions. Later on, when those regions were
occupied by the Sakas and Kushanas, Buddhism, along
with the Grecian culture, was readily adopted b)' these
uncivilized Turki people. To them, Brahmanism, with
its exclusive caste system, was repellent, while Buddhism,
with its good-will toward all men, naturally proved
attractive. But to meet their aspirations the Buddhist
teachers had to teach something more simple than pure
Buddhism. These people did not want a system of
ethics, but gods~"wtrom they could seej-'arrd tu whom
they could pray. So Buddha was gradually changed
into a divinity, and the prevailing Greek Art supplied
his images, which hitherto had been unknown in
Buddhism. The latter, once a select Order of ascetic
monks, now grew into a new popular religion, with a
pantheon of Buddhas and Bodhisatvas and attendant
deities and demons, whose images were adored in
spacious temples, with pompous ceremonials, and in
Hoisy festivals. This new Buddhism, as it embraced
the whole people, was called the Mahayana, or the
Great Vehicle, in contrast with the Hinayana, or the
Little Vehicle, of the primitive Buddhism, which had
been only for the select few. Just as the emperor
Asoka had been the patron of the latter, so now the
emperor Kanishka became the patron of the former.
Under him, a council of Buddhist leaders took place
at Jalandhar in the Punjab, where apparently the Canon,
or the collection of the Sacred Books of the Mahayana,
was fixed ; and thus the new Buddhism received its
official sanction. Asvaghosha, the poet and patriarch,
who was a contemporary of Kanishka, wrote for it a
book of devotion, called Buddha Charita, being a
legendary Life of Buddha. Its great apostle, about 180
A.D., was the celebrated Nagarjuna, who wrote the
Prajnaparamita, or, the Perfected Wisdom, a book which
S2
HISTORY OF INDIA.
was regarded as the highest authority on the Mahay ana
form of Buddhism. In the course of his long hfe,
Nagarjuna spread the new Buddhism throughout the
whole of India. It was only in Ceylon that the older
form, the Hinayana, survived. There it exists to the
present day, while the Mahayana has perished in India.
Though the new Buddhism enjoyed the general
favour of the Indian people, it must not
State of Brah-y ^^ thought that Brahmanism was entirely
manisra. ^ abandoned. On the contrary, both sys-
tems received from the kings gifts of land and property,
and the people still resorted to the Biahmans for all
domestic rites at births, marriages and deaths, and hved
under their rules of caste. The evidence of this is
contained in the famous Manava Dharma Shastra or
Code of Manu, which was compiled about 200 A.D., and
which records the system of Brahmanism as it existed
in this period. But, no doubt. Buddhism had the
hon's share of popular favour ; and it thus roused the
jealousy and even the hatred of Brahmanism, which
circumstance, as we have seen, did not remain without
its effect on the political history of India. Another
effect of the general fiivour shown to Buddhism, was
the neglect of the Vedic sacrifices and ceremonials, the
decay of the Brahmanic schools, and indifference
to the Sanskrit language and literature. On the other
hand, with reference to philosophy and
PhtinTnn^^S religious speculation, Brahmanism, rous-
rniiosopny. ^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^ ^j^^ ^.^^^^.^^ ^^ Buddhism,
developed a high degree of activity. We have already
noticed, in the preceding period, the beginnings of the
Vedanta, Sankhya, and Yoga philosophies. In the
course of this period, two new systems branched off from
the theistic Vedanta : ( i ) the Picrva Mhnamsa or
the Primary Enquiry, which treats of the spiritual value
of the Vedic sacrifices ; and (2) the Uttara Mimamsa
or Secondary Enquiry, which is merely a fuller develop-
ment of the older pantheism of the Vedanta. Similarly,
CH. VI.] THE LATER BUDDHIST PERIOD.
53
two new systems branched off from the atheistic Sankhya :
(i) the Vaisesh/ka, treating of physics and psychology,
and (2) the Nyaya, treating principally of logic. Thus
there were now six distinct philosophical schools, each
of which was provided with its own Sutra or Manual.
While Brahmanism thus devoted itself to the pursuit
of the mental sciences, it was in keeping
with the practical character of the new Sciences
Buddhism that it no less-fostersd the arts
and the applied sciences. Medicine, Architecture and
Sculpture attained a high degree of perfection xlurhigl-he /
perioj gf-llieJKjJshana ^empire. At Kanishka's court/
there flourished the great physician Charaka, whose!
SamJiita or general text-book on Medicine is still con-\
sidered a standard work in India. No less renowned is '
the Samhita or general text-book of the great surgeon
SusTuta, which is said to have been revised and enlarged
by Nagarjuna. Under the influence of Greek teachers
ot Art, and in the service of the new Buddhism, there
arose in Afghanistan and the Punjab the famous Gandhara *
/
" Rock-Temple of Kailasa."
54 HISTORY OF INDIA.
School of Architecture and Sculpture. It built magni-
ficent Chaityas or temples, and Viharas or monasteries,
and decorated them with numberless statues of the
Buddhist pantheon, and scenes from its mythology. A
similar school of a more Indian style flourished in
Central India, where the still existing ruins of Bharhut,
Sanchi, Amravati, Nasik and other places, testify to the
skill and enterprise with which the Buddhist artists built
their religious monuments with stone, or carved them
out of the hving rock.
There is a very early tradition, going back to the
third century A.D., which tells us that
St. Thomas, one of the twelve Apostles fipst Christian
of Jesus Christ, visited North-western india."^^"^ ^°
India in the reign of the Indo-Partbian
king, Gondophares. That king himself, and multitudes
of people with him, are said to have embraced the
Christian faith. St. Thomas is reported to have proceeded
afterwards to the court of another king, Mazdai, by
wiiose command he was put to death. There is no
good reason for rejecting this old tradition ; but the
Christianity, thus introduced, does not appear to have
long survived, though it would seem to have had an
indirect effect in fashioning some parts of the popular
Buddhism and Brahmanism of that time. At any rate,
however, there is no truth in the story of a mission of
St. Thomas to South India, in which part of the country
Christianity was introduced at a much later date, pro-
bably in the sixth century A.D., by Nestorian mission-
aries from Persia.
CHAPTER VII.
The Early Hindu Period :
The Second, or Gupta Empire, and the Brahmanic
Revival.
About joo — 6so A.D.
THE great event with which this period opens is the
establishment of the Gupta, or Second Indian
Empire. India, which, at the end of the
Rema.pks.^''^ preceding period, we saw broken up into
a number of large kingdoms, was now
reunited by it under one all-embracing rule. But this
rule lasted only a little more than two centuries, after
which India relapsed into its former condition of political
disunion. At first there was a number of large states ;
but these, as we shall see in the next period, in their
turn broke up into smaller units, and the condition, thus
created, of mutual distrust, rivalry, and warfare, rendered
India unable to withstand the shock of the great
Muhammadan invasion which at last surprised it near
the end of the twelfth century.
As has been said, after the fall of the Kanvayana
dynasty about j"^ B.C., the old Maurya
Dynast^"''^^ Empire had gradually shrunk to the
small, insignificant province of Magadha,
or Bihar. This country had been the nucleus of the
First Empire. It now became also the starting point of
the Second Empire. About 280 a.d., there lived in
Magadha a person called Gupta. He probably belonged
to the Sudra caste. How it happened we do not know ;
but in ihe troubled political condition of that time, he
came to the front, and succeeded in raising himself to the
56
HISTORY OF INDIA.
(iold coin o! Chandra Gupta and liis
Lichhavi Queen.
position of Maharaja, or King, of Magadlia. Hjs grand-
son, Chandra Gupta I,
contrived to marry a
princess of the powerful
clan of the Lichhavis of
Nepal. The access of
influence, thereby acquir-
ed, enabled him to extend
bis dominion as far as
Prayaga, or Allahabad,
and tbus to make the first
beginning of tbe great
Gupta Empire, This was in 320 a.d., and it is, therefore,
from this year that the so-called Gupta era dates. But
it was his son, Samudra Gupta, a contemporary of King
Meghavarna of Ceylon (304-332 a.d ) who was the real
founder of the empire. He was not only a great soldier,
but also an accomplished man of letters. He transferred
his capital from Pataliputra, or Patna. to Kausambi.
There he set up a pillar, now standing in Allahabad, on
which he engraved a record of his conquests. From this
record we know that, in the course of his long reign of
about fifty years (326-375 A.D.), Samudraliiipta subjected
to^his rule the whole ot the Indian peninsuia--m£h-J:he
exception of Gujarat and the Punjab in tTTewest, Bengal
in_the^ast, and the small Chola and PandvjJuQgdoms
in thelioutk Butn3ujaj^aF^^ndn5en^garwife afterwards
added to the empire by his son Chandra Gupta II (375-4 13
A.D.). This we know from a record on the Iron Pillar
at Delhi, which was incised after his death in memory
of his exploits. It will thus be seen that, as to its
geographical limits, the Gupta Empire nearly rivaled
that of the Mauryas. But over a very large portion the
rule of the Guptas was only indirect, or even nominal.
Their effective rule never extended beyond that part of
Northern India which we call Hindustan. The states
of the Deccan, such as the Kalachuri and Pallava, were
only feudatory, and those of the north-east, Bengal and
Ch. VII.] THE EARLY HINDU PERIOD.
57
Assam paid only a nominal tribute. In the countries,
however, which were under the direct rule of the Guptas,
the administration, according to the testimony of the
Iron Hillar and Qutub Minar at Delhi.
contemporary' Chinese pilgrim Fahian, rivalled in excel-
lence that of the great Asoka. This was specially the
case in 'jhe reign of Chandra Gupta II and in the earlif
years of his son Kumara Gupta I (about 413-455 A.r
F
5^ HISTORY OF INDIA.
In the later years, as we know from an inscription of his
son Skanda Gupta (about 455 480 a.d.) the empire was
reduced to great straits. How this exactly happened
we do not know ; but it appears to have been due to
the aggressive unrest of some of the small semi-indepen-
dent states on the western borders, which were fragments
of the former great Kushana Empire.
That empire, as we have seen in the preceding
period, gradually broke up after 226 a.d. It survived
into the middle of the fifth century only in the small
kingdom of the so-called Little Kushans, who ruled in
Kabul and Gandhara (N. W. Punjab). The other frag-
ments of the Kushana Empire, mainlv consisting of
foreign tribes, who occupied what is the modern Sindh
and adjacent parts, had been brought into nominal sub-
jection by Chandra Gupta II. It was these semi-mde-
pendent tribes that caused the decadence of the Gupta
Empire. The most active among them were the Pushya-
mitras, or Maitrakas, who, as their name shows, had, in
the course of time, become Indianised. Subsequently, as
we shall see in the next period, they succeeded in form-
ing the independent kingdom of Valabhi ; but in their
first attempt they failed, for Skanda Gupta, soon after
his accession, about 455 a.d., signally defeated them
together with their barbarian allies"; and thus re-
established the already tottering Gupta Empire. His
success, however, was but temporary. He was soon
afterwards confronted by far more formidable foemen.
/These were the so-called White Huns, a people of
/ Mongol race, who coming from Central Asia, overthrew,
' about 465 A.D., the kingdom of the Little Kushans.
Having done so, they penetrated into India, in irresistible
hordes, as far as Eastern Malwa, where, as we know
from two inscriptions of their leader Toramana, they
established, about 480 a.d., their rule over the western
^ortion of the Gupta Empire. About the same time,
Oi eastern portion passed to Skanda Gupta'r half-
oni-her, Pura Gupta, and soon afterwards, about 485 a.d.,
Ch. VII.] THE EARLY HINDU PERIOD. 59
to the latter's son Narasimha Gupta. During the time
of the latter's reign, Toramana was succeeded, about
//^l"^ 510 A.D., by his son
Coin of Vishnu Vardhana.
Mihiragula. This ruler
was noted for his inhu-
man cruelties, and it was,
no doubt, his cruel rule
that provoked a revolt
throughout his domi-
nions. The revolt was
headed by the Malava
clans who rose under their Chief, Yasodharman. In a
brilliant campaign,
in which he was
aided by the Vala-
bhi governor Dro-
nasimha, he utterly
demoHshed, about
525 A.D., the Hunic
power. In that
campaign, of which
Kalidasa, in his
Raghiroamsa, has
left us a sketch
under the figure of
Rama's " world -
conquest " ( dig-v'i-
jaya), he carried
his victorious arms
to the banks of
the Indus, and
into Kashmir, and
thus made himself
master of the whole
of the western por-
tion of the Gupta
Empire. But this succes did not content Yasodharman.
He now turned his attention to the eastern portion of
faw.'.v^'^Si
Vishnu Vardhana's Column of Victory.
6o
HISTORY OF INDIA.
that empire. Here the Gupta dynast}', under Nara-
simha's son Kumara Gupta II, had grown so feeble that
Yasodharman, about 529 A.D., easily set it aside, and
himself seizing the imperial power under the name of
Vishnu Vardhana, founded the Malava Empire. This
event he commemorated by the erection of two " Columns
of Victory," with duplicate inscriptions, the remains of
which exist to the present day at Mandasor.
i-l- The reign of Vishnu Vardhana forms one of the
most brilliant epochs in the history of
Dvnasty^^^^^ the Indian people. He was equally
great as a patron of learning, as an
administrator, and as a soldier. He not only re-asserted
the imperial authority throughout his wide dominions,
but, as we known from
still existing coins as well
as from the Rajataran-
ffhii, or Chronicles of
Kashmir, he also extend-
ed their limits by the
conquest of the latter
country. On the memor-
ial pillars above referred
to, he records the proud
boast that he not only had defeated the Huns under
Mihiragula, but that he also ruled a wider empire than
ever the Guptas had done. On account of his successful
liberation of the country from Hunic oppression, he lived
ever after in the memory and traditions of the people
as Vikramaditya, or the Sun of Valour (popularly Rajah
Bikram) — as shown b}'- its new name of Vikrama era, by
which the former Malava era is now known. After a
long and prosperous reign of about 56 years he was
succeeded, about 585 a.d., by his son, Siladitya, who
was a man of a very different character. The unpatriotic
reversal of his great father's anti-Hunic policy provoked
against him a hostile combination of some of nis fore-
most vassals. The confederates were headed bv Prabha-
Kashmir Coins of Vikramaditya.
Ch. VII.] THE EARLY HINDU PERIOD. 6l
kara Vardhana, the powerful chief of Thanesar, who was
related by marriage to both the imperial houses of the
Guptas and Malavas. The civil war which now ensued
resulted, about 593 a.d., in the temporary dethronement
of Siladitya. Though subsequently he succeeded, with
the help of Pravarasena II, the Hunic king of Kashmir,
in practically retrieving his position, he was defeated, in
606 A D., by Rajya Vardhana, the elder son of Prabha-
kara, in a great battle, which finally put an end to his
rule. A son of his, Bhandi by name, was appointed by
the victor to succeed him in the government of his
home province Malwa. There Bhandi's family continued
to reign till about 780 a.d., when, as will be related in
the next Chapter, it was extinguished by the Guijara
Chief Vatsaraja upon his conquest of Malwa. Rajya
Vardhana, on entering Kanauj after the battle, was
treacherously murdered by his enemies. His younger
brother, the famous Harsha Vardhana, now assumed the
direction of affairs, and fixing his capital at Kanauj,
determined to re-unite the imperial
power in his hands. In this enterprise Dynasty "^"^
he came into collision with Pulakesin II,
the Chalukya king of the Deccan, by whom he was
totally defeated, about 620 a.d. Conse-
quent on his victory, Pulakesin assumed Division of the
the imperial titles, and thus inaugurated Second Empire
.u ^^ ,. . . c ^i c J t? into those of
the great division 01 the Second Empire ^j^g North and
into those of the South and the North, the south.
In Northern India, on the other hand,
Harsha Vardhana was altogether successful in establishing
^4\mwii
Autograph or King Harsha.
his imperial authority, after which he got himself
62 HISTORY OF INDIA.
formally crowned about 612 a.d. With the ex-
ception of the rebellion of Dhruvasena, king of Valabhi
(or modern Gujarat) about 635 A.D., which Harsha
successfully subdued, peace and prosperity henceforth
ruled in his empire ; and that fact was signalised by him,
in 644 A.D., by a great religious convocation which he
held with much pomp in Prayaga, and which was attend-
ed by all his vassal kings, and by the most celebrated
doctors of the Brahmanic and Buddhist persuasions.
Thus in spite of his partial failure in the South, Harsha
Vardhana's forty years' rule over the Northern Empire
forms another brilliant epoch in the history of India,
and hence the year 606 a.d., which is the year
of his accession, has become the starting point of
the so-called Harsha era. Unfortunately the prosperity
which Harsha had created did not outlast his reign.
When he died at the end of 647, or beginning of 648
A.D., the throne was usurped by one of his Brahman
ministers. It so happened that just at this time an
envoy — Wang Hiuen Tse by name— of the Chinese
Emperor, was passing through Tibet and Nepal on his
way to the Indian Emperor, Harslja. On his arrival, he
found the Emperor dead, and himself most inhospitably
received. His escort was massacred by the usurper, but
he himself escaped to Nepal. This treachery led to a
ioint Tibeto-Nepalese war of vengeance, in which the
usurper was captured and sent to China. As to the
Indian empire, the effect of the war was a complete
anarchy, of which Dharasena IV, the king of Valabhi,
at once took advantage, assuming the imperial titles and
and thus inaugurating the permanent separation of the
kingdom of Valabhi from the Northern Empire.
We will now briefly pass in review the general
condition ofthe people during this period.
1 / the peotSe, ^^^ distinguishing feature is the revival of
1/ ' Brahmanic religion and literature, and the
rise of Hinduism through the blending of Brrhmanism
with Buddhism. The latter as we have seen in the
Ch. VII. ] THE EARLY HINDU PERIOD. 63
preceding period, had gradually changed into a popular
religion, and had almost monopolised the popular
favour. Brahmanism now made a determined effort to
recover lost ground, by imitating and adopting Buddhis-
tic beliefs, rites and practices, such as faith in numerous
male and female deities, worship of their images, pilgrim-
ages to their shrines, and so forth. In this effort it fully
succeeded, and the result was a thorough transformation
Brahmanism, and the upgrowth of that mixed
civilization which is known as Hinduism. The revival
,Brahmanism commenced with the rise of the Second
Empire and the Gupta dynasty. Samudra Gupta revived
the famous horse-sacrifice and struck a gold medal to
commemorate it. On their
coins the Gupta emperors
describe themselves as
parama-bhagavata , or fore-
most devotees of Vishnu,
■^^"r^-^^y or Krishna. In their time
•iij^tv^ the practice arose of record-
Medal of the Ilorse-sacrifice. j^g on COpper-platCS the
grants of land made to Brahmans for the maintenance
of temples and the service of images. Many of these
medals, coins, and copper-plates still exist as witnesses
to the religious condition of Northern India at that
time. Moreover, we have the account of an eye-wit-
ness in the reports of the Chinese Buddhist pilgrim
Fahian. He traversed the whole of Northern India
between 400 and 411 a.d., and found Brahman shrines
and Buddhist temples flourishing side by side in all its
large towns. Rather more than two centuries later, we
have the account of another Buddhist pilgrim, Hiuen
Tsang. In 644 a.d., he was present at the great
religious convocation at Prayaga above-mentioned.
He travelled over a large part of the peninsula, and
though he everywhere found many of the finest
Buddhist temples already in a ruined state, he nowhere
indicates the progress of any violent or w^arlike conflict
64 HISTORY OF INDIA.
between Brahmanism and Buddhism. This of course,
does not exclude the occasional occurrence of riots
between the two sects, but it shows that Buddhism was
not, as has sometimes been erroneously supposed,
stamped out by Brahmanist persecution, but that its
disappearance was the natural result of a gradual and
peaceful assimilation of the two systems so as to
produce the new system of Hinduism.
Coincident with the revival of the Brahmanic
religion was the revival of Sanskrit Lan-
The Revival of guage and Literature. From the time
ua|^"aiff "' ' ^^ ^^^ Guptas we find Sanskrit gradually
terature. , displacing the Prakrits, or vernaculars, in
' all records, public and private, and in
every branch pf literature, and this not only among the
Brahmanists, but also among the Buddhists and Jains.
From this time dates the religious and social literature
of the new Brahmanism, the eighteen Piiratias, or cyclo-
paidias of knowledge, the metrical Dhartna Shastras, or
law books, and the numerous original Tantras, or books
of religious formularies. In these works learned Brah-
mans sought to popularise the beliefs and practices of
the rising Hinduism. The Vayii Pnraiia, the earliest
of them, was probably compiled about 320 A.D., under
Chandra Gupta I. About that time begins the period
of what is called_thej Classical ' Sanskrit Tit.erature. It
enjoyed two particularly brilliant epochs — one during
the reign of Vishnu Vardhana ( Vikramaditya) of Malwa
about 529-585 A.D., and the other during the reign of
Harsha Vardhana of Kanauj about 612-647 a.d. Both
these emperors are celebrated as patrons of learning
and learned men. Harsha, indeed, is himself said to
have been a poet, and to be the author of the romantic
drama Rabiavali, or the Pearl-Necklace, which reflects
the court and harem life of his age. Vikramaditya's
court is said to have been adorned by ' Nine Gems,' or
men of great learning. The following famous writers,
certainly, belonged to his age : Varaha Mihira, who
Ch. VII.] THE EARLY HINDU PERIOD. 65
wrote the Brihat Satnhita, a sort of cyclopaedia of all
knowledge ; the great logician Dinnaga ; and the three
poets, Bharavi, the author of the epic poem Kiratar-
juniya ; Subandhu, the author of the romance Vasava-
datta ; and above all Kalidasa, who probably lived at
the court of Vishnu Vardhana. The last is the greatest
of India's poets. Some of his best works are the roman-
tic drama Sakiintala, or the love story of King Dushyanta
and the forest maiden Sakuntala ; the epic poem Raghu-
vatnsa, or the life of Rama and the history of his race ;
and the lyric poem Meghaduta, or the Cloud Messenger,
being an exile's message sent by a cloud to his wife
dwelling far away. The age of Harsha was no less
distinguished by its circle of cultured men. We have
here the two grammarians, Vamana and Jayaditya of
Kasi, or Benares, who wrote the Kasikavriti, the cele-
brated commentary on Panini's Grammar ; the great
astronomer Brahmagupta ; and the two poets Bana and
Dandin, the authors respectively of the romance Kadatn-
bari and the story book Dasa Kumara Charita, or the
Adventures of the Ten Princes. But the most eminent
among them was Bhartrihari, who was equally great as
grammarian, philosopher and poet. Besides other works
he wrote the Bhattikavya, in which he illustrates the
rules of Sanskrit grammar by means of an epic poem on
Rama, and the Niti Sataka, or one Hundred Verses on
Conduct, in which he inculcates maxims for the guidance
of daily life.
Another striking feature of this period is the culti-
vation of the Art of Painting. The most
conspicuous example of it is presented Art of Painting,
by the celebrated fresco paintings on the
walls of some of the cave temples of Ajanta. These
paintings belong to the more peculiarly Indian school
of art, and some of them probably go back to the pre-
ceding period. They represent, with uncommon beauty
and grate, incidents from the life of Buddha, as well as
notable events in the pohtical history of India. To the
66 HISTORY OF INDIA.
latter belongs, e.g., the picture whi6h shows the recep-
tion, in 625 A.D., of the ambassadors of the Persian king
Khusru II, by the Southern Emperor Pulakesin 11.
CHAPTER VIII.
The Later Hindu Period :
The Rajput States, The Qurjara Empire, and the
Early Mubammadan Invasions.
About 650 — 1200 A.D.
IN the preceding period we have seen how the Second
Indian Empire, founded by the Guptas, became
divided into the two empires of the South
and the North. At the end of that period Remapks!°^^
we saw the beginning of the disrup-
tion of the Northern Empire by the loss of the kingdom
of Valabhi. In the present period we shall see how the
Northern Empire steadily went on disintegrating into a
number of still smaller kingdoms or principalities. The
cause of this general break-up was the rise to political
power of the Jjajput clangs. These clans appear to have
been the natural outcome of the settlement in India of
the vigorous foreign ract s of Huns and Gurjaras, and of
their subsequent blending with the martial and ruling
native clans of India. With their youthful vigour these
newly formed Rajput clans pushed themselves into the
political forefront, swept away the old effete empire,
and replaced it by a large number of smaller kingdoms
and principalities, which, for a short time, were consoli-
dated into the Gurjara Empire. The mischief of this new
development, however, was that the mutual rivalries and
hostilities, engendered between the numerous Rajput
dynasties, rendered it impossible for them to oppose a
united front to the great conqueror of India, Muhammad
of Ghor, at the turn of the 12th century.
At the beginning of this period the Northern Empire
was shcjrn of its westernmost provin- ^he Later Gupta
ces, that is, of Gujarat, and also, as we Dynasty, and the
68 HISTORY OF INDIA.
shall see presently, of Sindh and the
Disruption of the Punjab. It embraced more or less
Noptliern Empire securely the rest of India north of the
Narbada, comprising Hindustan in its
widest sense, and Bengal. In the reduced empire, the
anarchy following the death of Harsha Vardhana appears
to have resulted in the ascendancy of a collateral branch
of the imperial Gupta dynasty. Its founder was Krishna
Gupta, who, under his imperial relatives, held a subordi-
nate position in Malwa. It was Aditya Sena, the seventh
in descent, who about 675 A.D., assumed the imperial
titles,* and who, for that reason, is traditionally known
in Bengal as Adisur, its first king. His successors con-
tinued to hold them for about a century longer. The last,
whose name is actually known by an inscription, was
Jivita Gupta, who reigned about 720 A.D., but as we
know from the coins of Jaya Gupta and Hari Gupta,
the dynasty must have continued for at least two
generations after him down to about 785 a.d. But its
rule was now limited to the eastern portion of the
empire, viz., Bihar and Bengal, where it was finally
displaced by the Pala dynasty.
The course of events that led to the break-up of the
Later Gupta empire is not exactly
of Kanaut^"^ known. But we know from a contem-
porary Jain record that in 783 a.d. there
existed two large kingdoms, one with its capital at
Kanauj, the other at Ujain, their territories being
divided, roughly speaking, by the Jumna. The former
kingdom, which comprised the north-western portion of
what had been the empire of Harsha Vardhana, and
contained its capital Kanauj, enjoyed for that reason the
* These were Parayna-bliattaraka, Maharajdhiraja and
Paramesvara, which are usually translated "the Most-Worship-
ful, the Great King of Kings, and the Supreme Lord." The
assumption of these titles is a useful guide in iracing the
vicissitudes of the empire.
Ch. VIII. ] THE LATER HINDU PERIOD. 69
great prestige of paramount empire, and hence became
the pivot of all subsequent political movements up to
the time of the Muhammedan conquest, which will be
related in the following Chapter. In this northern king-
dom we find a king Yasovarman reigning in 731 a.d.,
in which year he sent an embassy to China. He was
the patron of the two poets, Bhavabhuti and Vakpatiraja,
the latter of whom described the king's military exploits
in the epic poem Gaudavaha, or conquest of Bengal.
These exploits resulted in a war with Kashmir, which
led to his utter discomfiture by the Kashmir king
Lahtaditya Muktapida, and to the ultimate extinction of
his dynasty by Lalitaditya's grandson Jayapida, about
780 A.D. A new dynasty appears now to have been
founded by Indrayudha, who is known to have been
reigning in 'jii'i, a.d. This king got involved in an
unsuccessful war with his eastern neighbour Dharmapala,
the ambitious ruler of the above-mentioned kingdom of
Bihar and Bengal. As a result of the war his brother
Chakrayudha was raised to the throne under the
suzerainty of the victor. But Chakrayudha soon met
with a similar fate. He was defeated, about 814 a.d.,
in a war with his southern neighbour Nagabhata, the
Gurjara ruler of Malwa and Rajputana. The latter,
however, as we shall see presently, was himself defeated
by the Rashtrakuta Emperor, Govinda III ; and there-
upon Vajrayudha succeeded to the throne of Kanauj.
It was he, probably, under whom the northern kingdom
of Kanauj was annexed to the southern kingdom of
Ujain, which comprised the south-western portion of
what had been the Empire of Harsha Vardhana.
The first ruler of the southern kingdom was
Vatsaraja, the Chief of the Gurjara tribe. This tribe
appears to have come into India in con- .
junction with the Huns. It settled partly Empire!^"^^^^
in the Punjab, a portion of which is still
known alfter it by the name of Gujarat and Gujranwala,
and partly in Rajputana, which in early times was called
70 HISTORY OF INDIA.
also Gujarat. From Rajputana, where their original
capita] was in Bhinmal, the Gurjaras spread eastwards
into Malwa, where Vatsaraja is known to have been
reigning in Ujain in 783 a.d. They even temporarily
threatened the Pala kingdom of Bihar and Bengal,
whose king Gopala was defeated by Vatsaraja, about
790 A.D But Dhruva, the Rashtrakuta Emperor of the
Southern Empire, interfered, and defeating Vatsaraja
drove him back into Rajputana. Not long afterwards,
the Gurjaras renewed their eastward advance under
Vatsaraja's son, Nagabhata. This time, they penetrated
to Kanauj, whose king Chakrayudha, as stated above,
was conquered by them; but Dhruva's son, Govinda III,
again interfered, and defeating Nagabhata about 814
A.D., drove him back once again into Rajputana. For
the third time, the Gujaras advanced under Nagabhata's
son, Ramabhadra (about 820-842 a.d.) This time the
country was permanently conquered as far as the Jumna,
and Ramabhadra assumed the Imperial ritles. His son
Bhoja I (about 842-885 A.D.) resumed the Gurjara
advance across the Jumna, and finally overthrowing
and annexing the northern kingdom about 843 a.d.,
transferred his capital from Ujain to Kanauj. Under him
the Gurjara empire reached its widest extent, embracing
the whole of Hindustan in its widest sense. It was
bordered in the East by the Pala kingdom of Bihar and
Bengal, in the South by the Southern Empire of the
Rashtrakutas and in the West by the Muhammadan
kingdoms on the Indus. Bhoja's son, Mahendrapala
(about 885-910 A.D.j maintained the empire practically
unimpaired ; but after him it began to decline rapidly. In
the time of his son Bhoja H, about 9 1 3 a.d., Yasovarman,
the Chief of the Chandel Rajputs, set himself up in
Bundelkhand as an independent ruler with imperial
titles. And Bhoja II's half-brother, Mahipala, about
916 A.D., nearly lost his empire in a disastrous war with
his southern neighbour, Indra III, the Rashtrakuta ruler
of the Southern Empire. Though he soon afterwards
Ch. VIIL] the later hindu period. 71
recovered the larger portion of his empire, he had now
permanently lost the provinces of Malwa and Rajputana
to the Chiefs of the Parmar and Chohan Rajputs res-
pectively, the former of whom assumed the imperial
titles. Under Mahipala's son Vijayapala, who about
970 A.D. lost the Gwalior province to the Kachhwaha
Rajputs, the empire became practically reduced to the
territory north of the Jumna with the capital at Kanauj,
In this weak condition it was unable to offer any effec-
tive resistance to the now commencing encroachments
of the Sultans of Ghazni. About 991 a.d., Rajyapala,
the son of Vijayapala, was, together with his ally, king
Jayapala of the Punjab, disastrously defeated by Sultan
Sabuk Tigin, near the Khurram Valley. Later on, he
was even raided by the famous Sultan Mahmud, who
captured and sacked Kanauj in 10 19 a.d. In the follow-
ing year, having lost his life in a war with his rival, the
Chandel king Ganda, he was succeeded by his son
Trilochanapala. With him the once powerful Gurjara
dynasty disappears into obscurity till 1097 ^-D., when
we find Chandra Deva, the Chief of the Gaharwar
Rajputs, in possession of Kanauj.
The principality of Ajmir had always formed a part
of the western frontier of the Northern
Empire. Ithad been held bv the Chief l^^.^^J'Jl^^l,^.^
r 1 /^i 1 T-. • . r ii i- r Ajmir and Delhi,
of the Chohan Rajputs from the tmie of
the rise of the Gurjara power, about 780 A.D. Their
dynasty comprised a very long line of princes, who all
maintained a high reputation as powerful lords of the
Western Marches, and from about 1000 A.D., under
Simharaja, held a practically independent position.
The most conspicuous among them was Vigraharaja,
known as Bisal Deo, who, as we know from certain in-
scriptions on the famous Iron Pillar (now at Delhi;,
about 1 1 64 A.D. , considerably extended his dominions
southwards and northwards. He was great as a poet
as also as a warrior. A drama, written by him in 11 53
A.D., and named Harakali Nataka, has been found in
12 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Ajmir, incised on large marble slabs. His principal
acquisition was the territory of the Tomara Chiefs,
whose capital Delhi had been founded in 993 a.d , and
fortified in the eleventh century b}^ Ananga Pala by the
erection of the so-called Lalkot, or Red Fort. The last
of the Chohans was Prithviraja, the son of Vigraharaja's
younger brother Someswara. This is the celebrated
Prithiraj, or Rai Pithora, whose defeat near Thanesar, in
1192 A.D., at the hands of Muhammad Ghori, has be-
come famous as marking the epoch of the Muhammadan
conquest of India.
The Gaharwar dynasty, which was founded by
Chandra Deva about 1090 A.D., ruled
of Kanauj^^^^ ^^^^ greatly reduced kingdom of Kanauj
down to the time of the Muhammadan
conquest. Its kings still laid claim to the imperial titles,
although the kingdom comprised no more than the
country lying, roughly speaking, between Etawa and
Benares, north of the Ganges. The last of the line was
Jaya Chandra. With him the last remnant of the old
Northern Empire disappeared in 1193 a.d., when it was
annexed to the Muhammadan Empire of Muhammad
Ghori.
We have stated that Yasovarman, the Chandel
chief of Bundelkhand, with his capital
of ^Mahaba^^^ ^^ Mahoba, had assumed independence
about 913 A.D., and had set himself up
as a rival to the Gurjara Emperor. In consequence
his dynasty found itself involved in perpetual wars
with one or other of his neighbours who also claimed
the imperial crown. These were, in the north, the
Gurjaras and Gaharwars of Kanauj, in the south-west,
the Parmars of Malwa, and in the south, the Kalachuris
of Chedi. The pretensions of the Chandel dynasty
were finally extinguished by Qutbuddin Aibak, who,
under Muhammad Ghori's orders, reduced it to subjec-
tion in 1193 A.D.
At the time when the Gurjara empire began todechne,
THE EARLY HINDU PERIOD.
73
The Farm EPS
of Malwa.
i
^iyf^'L
'^V-
W"J.
\^
Deccan Coin of Ilarsha Deva.
about 916 A.D,, Mahva fell to the share
of the Parmar clan of Rajputs. Their
chief, Krishnaraja, assumed the imperial
titles, and founded the Parmar dynasty. The pretensions
to empire, as usual, involved the dynast} in almost per-
petual warfare with its neighbours. The kingdom attained
its widest extent under Harsha Deva Siyaka, the third
in descent, who, as we know from inscriptions and coins,
about 972 A.D., made an expedition into the Southern
empire, and plundered the
wealth of Malkher, the capital
of the Rashtrakuta dynasty.
But the best-known prince of
the dynasty is Bhoja, the cele-
brated patron of learning,
whose long reign, from about
loio to 1055 A.D., forms the most brilliant epoch in
this period of Indian history. Though repeatedly the
victim of Muhammadan raids, the dynasty preserved
its independence down to the beginning of the
fourteenth century, when its country was annexed to
the Muhammadan Empire by Muhammad I, of the
Khalji dynast}'.
It will be remembered that the Later Gupta dynasty
continued to rule in Bihar and Bengal down to about
785 A.D. About that time it appears to have been over-
turned by a local chief of Bihar called Gopala, who
resided at Mungir (Monghyr). He as-
sumed the imperial titles, and his ambi-
tion appears to have been to conquer
also the kmgdom of Kanauj for the sake
of the prestige of Empire attaching to it. The same
ambition, as we have seen, incited also the Gurjara Chief
Vatsaraja to his advance from the West. The two rivals,
from the East and West, met in battle, and Gopala was
defeated, about 790 a.d. His project was more
successAilly resumed by his son Dharmapala, (about 810-
875 A.U.). He conquered Kanauj, about 810 A.D., but
The Palas of
Bihar and
Bengal.
74
HISTORY OF INDIA.
MAP
Map illiisirat.rno Chapters IV to!X
Ch. VIII.] THE LATER HINDU PERIOD. 75
replacing the conquered king Indrayudha by his own
nominee Chakrayudha, he contented himself with the
suzerain power, which, as known from a land grant of his,
he retained till about 843 A.D., when, as previously
stated, the Kanauj kingdom passed into the possession
of the Gurjara emperor, Bhoja I. Dharmapala was
followed by a very long line of kings, the ninth of whom,
Mahipala, is known to have been on the throne in 1026
A.D. It was shortly after his time that Bengal became
independent under the Senas. The whole Pala dynasty
comprised some twenty members. It seems to have
never relinquished its allegiance to Buddhism ; and it was
owing to its patronage that Bihar remained the last
refuge of that Faith in Northern India up to the very
time of the Muhammadan conquest. The case was differ-
ent with the Bengal portion of its territory, which was
lost to Buddhism in the latter half of the nth century.
The reason appears to have been that, at the time, Bengal
was administered by governors who belonged to the
zealously brahmanic family of the Senas.
One of these, Vijaya Sena, about 1095 of ^Be^^ffal^
A.D., made himself independent of the
Pala sovereigns ; and his grandson, Lakshmana Sena,
ousted them even from Tirhut or North Bihar. This
was in 11 19 a.d., and hence that year has become the
epoch of the so-called Lakshmaniya era which is spe-
cially current in Tirhut. Lakshmana Sena had a very
long reign ; and he was still on the throne in 1193 A.D.,
when Bihar and Bengal were conquered by Muhammad-i-
Bakhtiyar, one of Muhammad Ghori's generals. It was
thus that the rule of the Pala and the Sena dynasties
was extinguished at the same time.
It was shown at the end of the preceding period,
how, at the time of the anarchy consequent on
Harsha Vardhana's death, the king- „, „. , „
J r A- 1 1 I ] /- • ^ The Kingdom of
dom or v alabhi, or modern Gujarat, Gujarat under
was dv*finitely separated from the the Valabhis and
Northern Enipire by Dharasena IV. ^^^ Chalukyas.
fd HISTORY OF INDIA.
of the Valabhi dynasty. This dynasty was so called,
because it had its capital at Valabhi, the modern Wala
in Kathiawad. It was founded, about 495 A.D., by
Bhatarka, the Chief of the Mihira, or Mair clan, probably
a Turki clan which had come in with the Sakas, but had
in the course of time become indianised. Bhatarka had
been appointed Senapati or Military Governor, by the
Hunic conqueror Toramana, in the time of the latter's
domination over the western portion of the Gupta empire.
His grandson, Dronasimha, as previously related, was
promoted to be Maharaja by the emperor, Vishnu Vard-
hana as a reward for his aid in delivering India from the
cruel domination of Mihiragula ; and Dharasena IV, the
twelfth in descent, as has also been stated, assumed the
imperial titles in 645 a.d. His successors continued to
hold that dignity till about 770 a.d,, when the Valabhi
dynasty became extinct with Siladitya VI, the nine-
teenth in descent. The exact cause is not known, but
it was probably effected by an Arab expedition from
Sindh. On the retirement of the Arabs, the throne was
seized by a Chavada chief, who made his capital at
Anhilvad, or Patan. His dynasty, under the suzerainty
of the Gurjara emperors, reigned down to about 970
A.D., when it was supplanted by Mularaja I, the Chief
of the Solanki, or Chalukya, Rajputs. These Rajputs
appear to have been a branch of the Gurjara tribe ; for
they gave to the country into vvhich they migrated the
name of Gujarat by which it is now known. Mularaja's
father is said to have come originally from the kingdom
of Kanauj, where his ancestors, for several generations,
had held the Katak, or fort of Kalyana. It is not
impossible that they were a collateral branch of the
Gurjara imperial dynasty. Be that as it may, Mularaja's
father migrated to Patan, and married the daughter of
the last Chavada king. On the latter's death, Mularaja
seized the throne. His Solanki dynasty continued to
rule Gujarat with the imperial titles down to the very
end of the thirteenth century, when their country was
Ch. VIIL] the later hindu period. 'n
annexed to the Muhammadan Empire by Muhammad I
of the Khalji dynasty.
It remains to describe the fortunes of Sindh and the
Punjab — originally also provinces of
what was once the great Northern Em- The Southern
pire— and their conquest by the Muham- fh^^eaHy"cha-
madans. But before doing so, it will be lukyas.
convenient briefly to relate the history
of the political divisions of South India, namely, the
Southern Empire and the kingdoms of the Pallavas,
Cholas, and Pandyas, and of the Kalachuris of Chedi.
We have seen that the Southern Empire was founded
about 620 A.D., by Pulakesin II, of the Chalukya dynasty.
The Chalukyas were a Rajput clan whose original seat
was in the north. Thence for some reason, no longer
known, they had migrated south about 550 A.D., under
their chief, Pulakesin I, who finally carved out for
himself a small kingdom with its capital at Badami.
His grandson Pulakesin II (about 609 — 642 A.D.), the
sixth of the dynasty, vigorously set himself to extend
the kingdom in all directions. He gradually brought
into more or less effective subjection the whole of
Southern India, from sea to sea, and from the Vindhyas
to Cape Comorin. It was thus that he came into
conflict with the Northern Emperor, Harsha Vardhana,
who aspired to the paramountcy of the whole of India.
In a great battle, fought in Malwa, about 620 a.d.,
Pulakesin II succeeded in inflicting a decisive defeat on
Harsha Vardhana, and compelling the acknowledgment
of the independency of the Southern Empire. A curious
proof of this achievement is afforded to us by the
Ajanta picture, previously referred to, of the compli-
mentary embassy from the Persian king, Khusru II.
The weak point, however, in Pulakesin's empire was
his claim to suzerainty over the Pallava kings, which
the latter persistently disputed. By way of safeguard,
Pulakesirt appointed, about 615 a.d., his brother Vishnu
Vardhana, to the practically independent rule of the
78 HISTORY OF INDIA.
eastern province of Vengi, reserving for himself the
larger western portion of the empire, whence his des-
cendants are known as the Western
Chalukvas^-^^e" Chalukya dynasty. The measure, how-
615-753 A.b. ' ever, did not prove sufficiently effective ;.
for at the end of his reign, about 642
A.D., he suffered a crushing defeat at the hands of the
Pallava king Narasimha Varman, who captured and
destroyed Badami. His successors, indeed, were able
to retrieve the disaster and maintain their supremacy ;.
and Vikramaditya II, the fourth in descent from
Pulakesin II, about 740 A.D., even succeeded in shat-
tering the Pallava power. Nevertheless the chronic
trouble with the Pallavas so weakened the Chalukya
power that, about 753 a.d., the rule of
kutas ?e^^753- Kirtivarman II, the last of the dynasty,
973 A.D." was overthrown by his rebellious feuda-
tory Dantidurga, who thus became
the founder of the Rashtrakuta dynasty. After a
time that dynasty threw out several branches reigning
in different parts of the country, the capital of the
paramount line being at Malkher. It was, as has been
already indicated, in a chronic state of conflict with
its northern neighbour, the Gurjara dynasty, several
members of which were defeated, respectively, by
Dhruva, the third after Dantidurga, about 790 a.d., by
Dhruva's son Govinda III, about 814 a.d., and by
Indraraja III, about 916 a.d. But its greatest power
the Rashtrakuta dynasty enjoyed during the long reign
of Govinda Ill's son, Amoghavarsha, (815-877 a.d.)..
He not only maintained his suzerainty over the Gangas
of Talakad (Mysore) and the Pallavas of Kanchipurand
apparently the Cholas and Pandyas of the extreme
south, but also held in subjection the Eastern Chalukyas
of Vengi ; so that, at this time, the Rashtrakuta
Empire had practically the same extent as that of the
Early Chalukyas under Pulakesin II. After him,
however, the Rashtrakuta power gradually declined, till,.
CH. VIII.] THE LATER HINDU PERIOD. 79
about 973 a.d., Tailapa II, a descendant of the Early
Chalukyas, and related by marriage to the Rashtrakutas,
succeeded with the help of the Northern
Yadava feudatories of Devagiri, in over- The Later West-
throwing Kakka II, the last of the ef ^TsS A^d!
Rashtrakutas. He thus founded the
Later Western Chalukya dynasty, which is known also
as the Chalukyas of Kalyani. The strongest member
of this dynasty was Somesvara I (1040-1069), but its
hold on the empire, even in its palmiest days, was
imperfect ; and after Somesvara I it grew still more
feeble. This was owing to the rise of the Cholas of
Kanchipur and Tanjore, and of the Hoysalas of
Dvarasamudra, the present Halobid. But it was the
latter that more directly caused the extinction of the
Chalukya rule. The Hoysalas held Northern Mysore
as feudatories of the Chalukyas. They rose to power,
by the conquest of their fellow-feudato-
ries, the Western Gangas of Talakad J. io48°1311 A.!)!
in southern Mysore. In 1173 a.d.,
their chief, Ballala II, assumed independence, and
even proceeded to contest with his suzerain for the
possession of the imperial power. Though he succeeded,
about 1 1 90 A.D., in overturning Somesvara IV,
the last of the Chalukya dynasty, he did not attain
his object. For Bhillama, the Yadava Chief of Devagiri
took advantage of the opportunity to seize the imperial
power him.self. Ballala for a time continued the
contest tor that power with the Yadava Emperors.
But it ended, about 12 10 a.d., with his signal defeat by
Singhana, the grandson of Bhillama. This victory
finally disposed of the pretensions of the Hoysalas,
though they continued to reign as feudatories down
to the Muhammadan conquest in 131 1 a.d. The
Yadavas were a Rajput clan who are said to
have migrated, about 825 A.D., from ^^^ Yadava
MathurA into the Deccan to their new Dynasty : e.
seats about Devagiri. Here, known as 1210-1318 A.D.
So HISTORY OF INDIA.
the Early Yadavas, they lived as the trusty feudatories
of the Chalukya and Rashtrakuta dynasties down to the
end of the twelfth century, when, under the name of the
Later Yadava dynasty, they rose, about 1 190 a.d., under
Bhillama to supreme power. His grandson Singhana
(1210-1247 A.D.^ and the latter's grandson Krishna
(1247-1260) were the two most powerful members of
the dynasty. They appear to have succeeded in re-
uniting, for the third time, what were the original
territories of the Southern Empire of Pulakesin 11.
Their descendants reigned down to 1307 a.d., when, as
we shall see in the next period, the reigning Yadava
prince, Ramadeva, was compelled by Malik Kafur to
submit to the Muhammadan Empire. Nominally the
dynasty continued to reign till 13 18 a.d., when Hara
Pala, the last of the Yadavas, was cruelly slain by the
emperor, Mubarak Shah, against whom he had rebelled.
The Pallavas or Pah lavas, who have been referred
to repeatedly in the preceding account
King-dom^^^ ^^ events, appear to have been originally
a Parthian tribe, who came into India
in the time of the Indo-Parthian domination, in the 2nd
century A.D. Under the pressure of the subsequent
Kushana invasion they seem to have wandered into
Southern India, where they settled on the south-east
coast, within the country of the Andhras and Cholas,
betw^een the Godavery and Kaveri rivers, with
capitals at Vengi and Kanchipur (Conjeveram). In the
meantime, as their names show, they had become
thoroughly indianised, and their foreign Pathian origin
was forgotten. We obtain the first glimpse of their
South-Indian principality, about 430 A.D., when their
Chiefs Vishnugupta in Kanchipur and Hastivarman in
Vengi, were subjected by Samudra Gupta. On the
decline of the Gupta Empire, they formed an independent
kingdom, which now seems to have extended across
South India to the west coast. From the 7th to the 9th
century, their kings persistently, though ineffectually,
Ch. VIII. ] THE LATER HINDU PERIOD. 8l
disputed the supremacy of the Early Chalukya and
Rashtrakuta Emperors of the Southern Empire. It
was their king, Mahendravarman II, who, about 6io
A.D., was subjected by Pulakesin II, the Early Chalukya.
But Narasimhavarman, about 642 a.d., again asserted
his independence by the defeat of Pulakesin II, and the
capture of his capital Badami. His reign (about 640-
655 a.d.) marks the height of the Pallava power, which
included the suzerainty over the kings of the Cholas
and Pandyas. After him it again declined, till through
the successive victories of the Early Chalukya Vikrama-
ditya II, about 740 A.D., over Nandivarman, and of the
Rashtrakuta Govinda III, about 803 a.d., over Dantiga,
it became so shattered, that, about 900 a.d , under
Aparajita, it was entirely overthrown by the Chola king
Aditya, who annexed the Pallava territories to his own
kingdom.
About 615 A.D., as has been mentioned, Vishnu
Vardhana, the younger brother of
Pulakesin II, had become the indepen- The Eastern Cha-
dent sovereign of the eastern portion ^ b30-l07(f A^dT '
of the Southern Empire. His king-
dom comprised the country lying along the lower courses
of the Godavery and Kistna rivers, and had Vengi for its
capital. There his descendants, known as the Eastern
Chalukya dynasty, reigned without any conspicuous
influence on the course of the history of the Empire,
down to 1070 A.D., when their kingdom became merged
into that of the Cholas. About the early Chola kingdom
very little is known. Its territory was
on the south-eastern coast, north and Jhe Chola King-
south of Madras. It was known al- j^q
ready to the Sanskrit Grammarian
Kaiyayana in the fourth century B.C. As we have seen,
it formed no part of Asoka's Empire in the third century
B.C., nor was it included in the conquests of Samundra-
gupta, at/out 340 A.D. At the latter date it can have
been but a small kingdom. It was so still at the time
82 HISTORY OF INDIA.
when it was reported on by the Chinese pilgrim, Hiuen
Tsang, about 640 a.d., when it was tributary to the
Pallava kings ; and it remained so for about two centuries
longer, until it came under the rule of a new dynasty.
The second of this dynasty, Aditya II, as previously
stated, about 900 A.D., shook off the Pallava supremacy.
Rajaraja I, the fourth in descent from Aditya, but the
loth of the dynasty, by the conquest of the Pallava
and Pandya territories, about 995 a.d., succeeded in
founding a great rival Chola kingdom. This kingdom
reached the height of its power and extension in the
reign of his son, Rajendra I (1018-1042 a.d ). This king
conquered the Burmese kingdom of Pegu in 1025-1027
A.D., made war with the Later Chalukyas of Kalyani,
and even carried his raids as far north as the banks of
the Ganges, in commemoration of which latter achieve-
ment he built a new capital at Gangapuri. The kingdom
continued flourishing for some time. In the long reign
of Rajendra II (1070-1118 A.D.), who was a grandson
of the Eastern Chalukya king Vimaladitya by the latter's
maniage with a daughter of Rajaraja, the Eastern
Chalukya territory was united with the original kingdom
of the Cholas. After Rajendra II the Chola power
gradually declined. About 1 1 50 a.d. it lost the tributary
kingdom of the Pandyas, and, as a result of the expedi-
tion of Malik Kafur and Malik Khusru to the Malabar
coast, in 131 1 and 1319 a.d., it sank thenceforth into
the position of a petty principality.
Respecting the Pandya kingdom in the earliest days
our information is very meagre. It
K?nffdon?^^^ occupied the southernmost portion of
the Indian peninsula, south of the Vellaru
river, w^ith Madura as its capital. Of its existence as
early as the fourth century B.C. we know both from Katya-
yana's grammatical notes and from the reports of Megas-
thenes. Its existence, in the third century B.C., is shown
by the Edicts of Asoka. According to Strabo a'nd Pliny,
who lived in the first and second centuries A.D., it was a
Ch. VIII. ] THE LATER HINDU PERIOD. 83
flourishing and enterprising kingdom in those days,
possessing a regular maritime trade with the West, and a
high degree of culture. Later on, it seems to have
declined politically ; for at the time of Hiuen Tsang's
visit to Southern India, about 640 a.d., it appears to
have been under the suzerainty of the Pallava kings of
Kanchipur ; and still later, after the fall of the Pallava
power, from about 994 A.D., it was tributary to the Chola
kingdom. About 1250 a.d. it appears to have regained
some degree of independence under a king named
Sundara ; but soon afterwards, in 131 1 a.d., it shared in
the general eclipse of the South Indian states, consequent
on Mahk Kafur's military expeditions.
The kingdom of Chedi was situated in the country
south of the Narbada, corresponding to
modern Berar and the Central Provinces. Jf cSi °^
Of the early history of this country we
have very little information. It must have been included
in the Maurya and Sunga Empires. Afterwards it
belonged to the great kingdom of the Andhras. What
happened to it at the time of the break-up of that king-
dom, in the middle of the third century a.d., we do not
exactly know. It is only towards the end of the ninth
century a.d., that we again obtain a glimpse of it. At
that time we find that the so-called Kalachuri era was
current in the Chedi country ; and as that era, as
previously observed, took its rise in the Northern
Konkan province at the time of the extinction of the
Andhra dynasty, in 249 a.d., some close connection
appears to have prevailed in the intermediate period
between the northern Konkan and the neighbouring
Chedi country. Anyhow, in the ninth century we find the
latter country in the possession of the Haihaya Rajputs,
whose Chief, Kokalla, having married his daughter to
Krishna II of the Rashtrakuta dynasty of the Southern
Empire, established, about 875 a.d., an independent
kingdonl and founded the Kalachuri dynasty. The two
most powerful members of this dynasty were Gangeya-
^"1
84 HISTORY OF INDIA.
deva and Karnadeva, who between them must have
reigned for about a century (1015-1040 and 1040-1115
A.D.). This was the period of the disruption of the
Gurjara empire ; and those two monarchs, assuming the
imperial titles, entered into warlike competition with
their neighbours for the paramount power hitherto
wielded by Kanauj. Gangeyadeva, as we know from
Alberuni, reigned about 1030 a.d., and the influence
which his rule exercised may be seen from the fact that
a new type of coin which he introduced was thereafter
^.^^ adopted bv his northern
i#r!?'^?:^i ,^^1^^ neighbours, the Chandel
\^ kings of Mahoba, and even
the Gurjara kings of Kanauj.
It was about this time that
the sway of the Kalachuris
Gold coin of Gangeyadeva. was extended southwards
over Telingana, which gave
them one of their titles, "Lords of Trikalinga." Sub-
sequently, in the twelfth century, they divided into two
branches reigning in the easLern and western portions of
the country, called Dahala and Mahakosala, with
Ratanpur and Tewar (close to Jabalpur) as their
respective capitals. Jajalla I and Yasahkarna, the
son of Karnadeva, are known, from their inscriptions,
to have been reigning in the East and West, in 1114
and 1120 respectively. At the same time, about
1 1 50 A.D., the southern portion, Telingana, assumed
independence under its own Kakatya
The Kakatiyas dynasty, who made their captial at
nbZfiidAsi:^' Warangal. About 12 10 A.D., the whole
territory became subject once more
to the Southern Empire under the Yadava Singhana.
Ultimately, in the first quarter of the fourteenth century,
sharing the fate of that empire, it passed into the
povver of the Muhammadan Empire under the Khalji
dynasty.
We will now turn to the history of Sindh and the
Ch. VIII.] THE EARLY HINDU PERIOD. 85
Punjab. We have learned already that
these provinces had been lost to the TheKing-domof
Northern Empire at the openhig of the IV^alf CoSque?t
present period. The early history of
Sindh is not yet fully known. But it w^ould seem that
at the time of the Hunic invasion, about 515 a.d., the
famous Mihiragula of the Jabula clan, whom the Greeks
knew as Gollas, established his rule over the country.
His hinduized descendants, known as the Raya dynasty,
are said to have reigned down to 631 a.d. In that year
Chach, their Brahman minister, usurped the throne ; but
his Brahman dynasty was very short-lived. Under
Dahir, a son of Chach, it was extinguished by the Arab
conquest of Sindh in 712 a.d. In that year Muhammad-
i-Qasim was sent by Hajjaj, the Arab governor of
Babylonia, to inflict punishment on Dahir for the
piratical seizure of an Arab ship at Debal, a little
east of the present Karachi. After storming Debal,
Muhammad marched up the old course of the Indus
to a fort called Rawar, near Bahmanabad. Here Dahir
was defeated and slain in a great battle, and his queen,
Rani Bai, rather than fall into the hands of the enemy,
after the capture of the fort, burned herself on a funeral
pyre. Aror, Dahir's capital, as well as Multan, after
prolonged sieges, capitulated ; and these successes
completed the conquest of Sindh. Thenceforward it
formed a province of the Khalifat, or Arab Empire, till,
in 871 A.D,, it was separated into two independent
kingdoms with their capitals at Multan and Mansura.
After a long term of comparative power and prosperity,
they both fell into disorder in 935 A.D., through the
settlement in them of the Oarmatians, a heretical sect
of Muhammadans. Finally in loio a.d., thej'^ were
overthrown by the famous Mahmud, the orthodox
Muhammadan ruler of Ghazni.
The early history of the Punjab is no less obscure
than that of Sindh. So much, however, is certain that,
together with Gandhara, or Eastern 'Afghanistan, it
86 HISTORY OF INDIA.
The Kingdom of formed a kingdom which was ruled by
tht Gh"azna^de ^ dynasty of so-called Turki Shahis,
Invasions. residing in Kabul. Possibly their rule
was only a revival of the kingdom of the
Little Kushans, which, as we saw in the preceding chap-
ter, had been temporarily overthrown by the Hunic inva-
sion about 465 A.D., or they may have been a Hunic
dynasty. Be that as it may, the rule of the Turki Shahis
endured till about 870 a.d., when, as we know from Albe-
runi's account, it was supplanted by their Brahman minis-
ter Lalliya. He founded the so-called Brahman Shahi
dynasty, which made Wahand ( Ohind ), on the Indus, their
capital. Bhima Deva, the fourth of the Hne, appears to
have been set aside, about 960 A.D., by the Rajput prince
Jaipal, possibly a hinduized descendant of the Kushan
dynasty. Under him the kingdom became limited to
the Punjab, and its capital was transferred to Bhatinda,
near Lahore. This happened in 989 a.d., as the result
of an unsuccessful war with Sabuk Tigin, the Samanide
governor of Ghazni, who extended his territory up to the
Indus. The Rajput dynasty finally succumbed, in 102 1
A.D., to the repeated attacks of Sultan Mahmud, the son
and successor of Sabuk Tigin. This celebrated Sultan was
the real founder of the Ghaznavide dynasty and empire.
Having made himself independent of the Samanides, by
conquering nearly the whole of their empire in Turkestan
and Persia, he proceeded to extend his dominions into
India, which he is said to have invaded no less than
seventeen times. With the exception of three, all these
campaigns were devoted to the conquest and permanent
annexation of the frontier kingdoms of Sindh and the
Punjab. The former, as we have seen, was reduced in loio
A.D. Jaipal, of the Punjab, who attempted, in alliance
with Rajyapala, king of Kanauj, and Ganda, king of the
Chandels, to resist the further encroachments of Mahmud,
was defeated in 100 1 A.D. Unable to bear his disgrace,
he is said to have burned himself to death. His son,
Anandpal, was defeated in 1009 a.d. Trilochanpal,
Ch. VIII.] THE LATER HINDU PERIOD. 87
who succeeded in 10 13 a.d., was also defeated and
driven to take refuge in Kashmir. Thence, as we know
from the Rajatarangini, or the Kashmir Chronicle, he
attempted in 1021 A.D., with the support of a Kashmirian
army, to recover his kingdom. But the crushing defeat
which Mahmud inflicted on him and his allies put an end
to his life as well as to his dynasty. Though a son of
his, Bhimpal, escaped from the disaster, the Punjab
formed henceforth a part of the Ghazni empire, and was
administered by Muhammadan governors.
In the campaign of 1009 a.d., after the death of
Anandpal, Mahmud had captured „ , a^ n
Nagarkot, or the Fort of Kangra. S^s a^t
Here, for generations, the wealth of the the Indian King-
kings of the Punjab and their chiefs doms.
had been stored. The whole of this treasure — an
incredible amount of jewels, money, and objects of
silver and gold — was looted by Mahmud, and trans-
ported to Ghazni. The sight of it served to whet
the appetite for plunder, and crowds of Turkis and
Afghans flocked to Mahmud's standard. With an army
thus swelled, Mahmud set out on his three expeditions
into the interior of India. They were, as a matter of
fact, only far-reaching raids, undertaken with no aim at
conquest, but simply for the sake of plunder and the
satisfaction of a vow, made at the beginning of his reign,
that every year should see him wage a holy war against
the "infidels" of Hindustan. The first campaign, 1018
A.D., was directed against the kingdom of Kanauj.
Marching by way of Mathura, which he captured and
plundered of the fabulous wealth of its temples, he
advanced on Kanauj. Its king, Jaipal, had fled. His
capital, with its seven forts, was taken in one day, and
all its gorgeous temples were utterly despoiled. After
treating similarly some other neighbouring towns, Mah-
mud returned to Ghazni. The second campaign was
directed ctgainst the kingdom of Bundelkhand, where,
1023 A.D., Mahmud besieged Gwahor and Kalinjar. Its
88 HISTORY OF INDIA.
king, Ganda, saved himself only by buying off the in-
vader with an enormous ransom. The third campaign
took place in 1026 a.d., and had for its objective
Somnath, the holy city of Gujarat, which lay at the
furthest extremity of Kathiawar on the sea-coast, and
was strongly fortified There stood one of the most
sacred temples of the Hindus, enshrining a far-famed
Lhiga, a conical stone of great size, visited by hundreds
of thousands of pilgrims, and served, so it is said, by a
thousand Brahmans who guarded its countless treasures
of jewels and money. Mahmud captured the town
with great slaughter, and sacked the temple. The great
Linga was cast down and broken into four pieces, two
of which were sent to Ghazni, and the others to Mecca
and Medina, as witnesses of Mahmud's zeal for the Faith.
The sandal wood gates of the temple, also, were carri-
ed off to Ghazni, and a
million pounds worth of
■r-i 'v'k treasure is said to have re-
1 '5 I ,w warded the "Idol-breaker,"
%jy^ by which name Mahmud
"^i_2l>^ became hence-forth known.
T J- ^ • r A» u J It was his last and most
Indian Coin of Mahmud. . , .
(Struck at Lahore, 1027 A.D.) noteworthy achievement.
He died four years after-
wards, in 1030 A.D. His successors continued to reign
for about 150 years after his death ; but their power steadily
waned. They were at last expelled from Gjiazni, and their
dominion was narrowed down to the Punjab. The last of
the dynasty was Khusrau Malik. With him the line ended,
1 186 A.D., in the general conquest of India by Muhammad
Ghori.
A survey of the general condition of the people in
this period may now be given. The
The Establish- process of assimilation of Brahmanism
ment of Hindu- ^^^^ Buddhism, which was already in full
operation in the preceding pe/iod, now
ended with the complete establishment of Hinduism. A
CH. VIII] THE LATER HINDU PEKIOD. 89
principal agent in effecting ibis result was the institution
of rival monastic Orders among the Brahmanists. The
beginning was made, about 800 a.d., by the famous
Saiva reformer, Sankara Acharya, and his immediate dis-
ciples. They founded the four Saiva Orders, which are
known as the Dasanamis ; and these Orders, in their turn,
led to the creation of the Vaishnava Orders. All these
Brahmanist Societies carried on, among the mass of the
people throughout the whole of India, a most effective
propaganda in rivalry with the Buddhist and Jain
monks. The difference between the two parties of
rival monastic Orders ultimately became one of mere
scholastic doctrine. In their outward manifestation,
so far as it affected the mass of the— peo^ikL^jvith
regard toj;eligiousjvorship3nd_social order, they both
constituted but one system of Hinduism. Of this
system we possess a valuable contemporary account
by the celebrated Arab historian, Alberuni, in his
Tahqiqul Hind, or Indian Research, which he completed
in 103 1 A.D. As a natural consequence of its develop-
ment, the old Brahmanism, as well as Buddhism, died
out ; neither of them exist any more in India. Hinduism,
however, possessed_ tlie jnherent weakness of being a
compromise -between two decaying systems. This
showed itself particularly in the decay of religion and
its forms of worship, and in the ascendancy of the Sakta
sect and its religious practices, which consisted mainly
in the worship of Saktis, or female deities, and were of
a kind that dared not show themselves in the light of
day. It is a form of sectarian religion which is still onjy
too widely prevalent, particularly in Bengal^ and ifs
influence is only now beginning to wane with the pro-
gress of modern enlightenment.
The establishrngnt ofLHinduism had anotherjresuh.
The cultivaTion of Classic Sanskrit
literature and philosophy, which had c°"^w°t" °^
owed its /ise to the early fervour of the LUerature.
Brahmanical revival, began to decline
H
90 HISTORY OF INDIA.
in this period. Still, from time to time, we meet with
striking exceptions. Thus we have the two great
champions of Brahmanism, Kumarila Bhatta, about 725
A.D., and Sankara Acharya, about 800 A.D., who wrote
the Tantra Varttika and the Brahtnasidra Bhashya,
the standard commentaries respectivel}'^ on the Mimamsa
and Vedanta philosophy. As representatives of light
literature we have, about 735 a.d., Bhavabhuti, the
greatest dramatist next to KaHdasa, who, among other
works, wrote the romantic drama Malati Madhava, or
the love story of the princess Malati and a young scholar
Madhava ; about 860 A D., the poet, Magha, who wrote
the epic poem Sisupalavadha, or the slaughter of
Sisupala by Vishnu; about 910 a.d., the dramatist,
Rajasekhara, who wrote several plays of exquisite
lightness and grace ; and about iioo a.d., the lyric poet
Jaya Deva, the author of the famous Gitagovi7ida, or
Song of Krishna's love for Radha. In the first half of
the eleventh century specially, as we have already seen,
the court of Bhoja Deva, the Parmar king of Malwa,
w^as a great centre of Sanskrit learning. He is himself
said to have been a poet, and, like Vishnu Vardhana
(Vikramaditya) and Harsha Vardhana, to have delighted
in collecting learned men around him.
As the establishment of Hinduism had marked the
•• :^ earlier part of this period, so its later
Son of ^Islam!" P^^^ ^'^^ distinguished by the introduc-
tion of Muhammadanism. The advent
of Islam in India was co-incident with areyolting
departure from previous methodS-iilf warfare'. Wholesale
massacres of the male population of forts and towns, such
as occurred at the time of their capture by Muhammadan
armies, were a feature liitherto unknown in purely
Indian warfare. Yet it would be wrong to set it down
altogether to the account of the faith of the invaders.
It was rather due to the fierceness of the natural tem-
perament of the Arab and Turki races who werfe unable
to brook stubborn resistance, and were apt to be carried
Ch. VIII.] THE LATER HINDU PERIOD. 91
away beyond all bounds by savage resentment. Massa-
cres in cold blood, or wanton cruelty, cannot be proved
in the cases of Muhammad-i-Oasim and Mahmud of
Ghazni. On the contrary, there is evidence of much
toleration. To those who submitted, liberal terms were
granted. Acceptance of the Muhammadan faith was
not enforced on the general_population, whatever rnay.
have been JTie ]case~"wiI10ndrvTdual s. Apart from the
actual moment of conquest, when temples were destroy-
ed or turned into mosques, the institutions of Hindu
worship and caste were not interfered with. The
Brahmans and their temples were not only tolerated, but
even protected, and the Hindu forms of administration
were largely retained. All that was exacted from the
Hindu population was the payment of the jiziya, or poll-
tax. This, no doubt, was a heavy impost, but, on the
other hand, it gave exemption from compulsory military
service. Nor did intellectual culture suffer through the
change of rulers, except in one point. Wherever Islain
became dominant, it was no longer Sanskrit but Arabic
and Persian hterature^ and sciencejwhich enjoyed its^
patronage^^ ATTtTe'very time~when Sanslml Tetters
flourisE^raTthe court of King Bhoja ...
Deva of Malwa, the court of Mahmud sian Literature'
in Ghazni became a brilliant centre of
Persian learning. Two of the best known among the
many men of culture whom Mahmud assembled round
him, were Alberuni, the eminent chronologist, who has
already been mentioned, and who wrote both in Arabic
and in Persian, and the poet Firdausi, who wrote the
celebrated Persian epic, called the Shahnama, or the
Book of Kings, the great store-house of the ancient
traditions of Persia.
/
CHAPTER IX.
The Early /Huhammadan Period :
The Mubammadao Conquest, and the Third (First Muham^
madan), or Turki Empire.
About 1 200 — 7525 A.D.
THE preceding period has already given us a glimpse
of the impending conquest of India by the Turkis,
It has shown us how ill-prepared India " '
was to meet that crisis. We have seen Remark?°^^
it divided into a number of smaller
kingdoms, which had portioned among themselves the
imperial inheritance, and were fighting with one another
for the imperial crown. In the north there were five
such kingdoms : those of BengatT'KangujT^undelkhand,
Mal\va7"^nd^"^ujaraf^^ Their rulers each claimed" to be
the rigHtful '^'^^Tiiperor." Foremost among them was
the King of Kanauj, whose claims, as the direct representa-
tive of the older empire, were popularl}' considered the
best. But his power was not equal to his pretensions.
The Chohan lords of his Western Marches, Delhi and
Ajmir, were grow^ing in importance and inclining to
throw off the overlordship of Kanauj. Intent upon
nursing their mutual jealousies, the kings and chiefs of
Northern India failed to detect the danger to their
common country that was growing up on its western
borders in the rising empire of the Turkis.
In the midst of Afghanistan, in the mountains of
Ghor, to the west of Ghazni, there
hved a hardy race of Tajiks, or men of Jan C?nqS^"
mixed Arab descent, under a chief called
Suri. One of his descendants, Alauddin, known as
Jahansoz, or the World-burner, on account of his ferocity,
revolted about 1 150 A.D., against his Ghaznavide overlord
Ch. IX.] THE EARLY MUHAMMADAN PERIOD. 93
and drove him into the Punjab. His nephew, Ghiyas-
uddin, finally overturned the empire of Ghazni, and
founded that of the Ghoris. This happened in 1186
A.D., when Muizuddin, the brother and co-regent of
Ghiyasuddin, generally known as Muhammad Ghori,
conquered the Punjab, the last remnant of the once
powerful Ghaznavide empire. Its province of Sindh
had already been annexed by him in 1175 a.d. He
now took in hand the conquest of the Hindu kingdoms
on his eastern frontier. With a large army of Turkis,
Afghans, and Tajiks he set out eastward. Prithiraj, the
Chohan lord of the Western Marches, Delhi and Ajmir,
assembled all his feudal chiefs with their Rajput levies
to meet the attack. Twice the opposing armies met on
the same battlefield near Thanesar. The first time, in
1 191 A.D., Muhammad Ghori was defeated and retired
to Ghazni, but in the following year, 1 1 92 a.d., he return-
ed, and this time totally defeated Prithiraj who was
captured and soon afterwards slain. The immediate result
of the victory was the capture^ in 1193 a.d., of Delhi
andAjinir, and the annexation oTtheir territofies. The
furlher prosecution of the conquest was entrusted by
Muhammad to his most capable general, Qutbuddin
Aibak, a Turki slave. This general first turned his arms
against the kingdom of Kanauj, the ruler of which Jaya
Chandra, it is said, had refused to come to the assistance
of his contumacious vassal, Prithiraj. Jaya Chandra
was defeated and slain, in 1194 a.d., in a battle near
Etawa, and, as a result, the whole of his kingdom, as far
as Benares, fell into the power of Qutbuddin The latter
now despatched Muhammad-i-Bakhtiyar, who held a
subordinate command under him, to continue the east-
ward conquest of the kingdoms of Bihar and Bengal,
while he himself undertook the task of reducing to
submission the kingdoms of Bundelkhand, Malwa, and
Gujarat, In this, however, he was only partially
successful. For those three kingdoms maintained them-
selves in a state of semi-independence down to the time
94 HISTORY OF INDIA.
of the Khalji dynasty, in the beginning of the fourteenth
century. By the year 1205 a.d., the conquest of the
whole of Northern India was practically completed.
In the following year, 1206 a.d., Muhammad Ghori was
murdered in his tent beside the Indus by some Musalman
heretics, or, as others say, by a band of Hindu Khokhars.
The Ghoride Empire, founded by Muizuddin
Muhammad, did not outlast his death.
The Slave Dyn- It separated into two parts. The west-
Y^ i^^O^-^^^O em portion, beyond the Indus, passed to
his son, while of the eastern portion
Qutbuddin Aibak assumed the sovereignty, and thus
became the founder of the Third Indian, or First Muham-
madan, Empire in India (wrongly called the Pathan).
His line, known as that of the Turki Slaves, and com-
prising ten Sultans, ruled down to 1290 A.D. But the
only two important ones, beside himself, are the third,
Shamsuddin Altamsh (1210-1236 A.D.), and the tenth,
Ghiyasuddin Balban (i 266-1 287 a.d.). Aibak was only
the nominal ruler of Northern India ; his actual rule ex-
tended no further than Hindustan. In the provinces of
Sindh and the Punjab, as well as in Bihar and Bengal,
his governors exercised practically independent sove-
reignty ; and the Hindu rulers of Bundelkhand, Malwa,
and Gujarat were never fully subjected. Altamsh, a
Turki slave and son-in-law of Aibak, was engaged,
throughout his long reign of 26 years, in constant wars
with his contumacious governors and the irrepressible
Rajput kings. When at last, 1235 a.d., he succeeded
in making his authority respected, he enjoyed his
success only one year, dying in 1236 a.d. Exactly
the same state of things repeated itself after his death.
Under his immediate successors, in spite of the able, but
too short, reign of his daughter Raziyyat, the imperial
authority again declined ; and Balban, a Turki slave and
father-in-law of Mahmud, son of Altamsh, had to go
once more through the wearisome process of re'^onstruc-
tion. He performed his task with conspicuous ability,
Ch. IX.] THE EARLY MUHAMMADAN PERION. 95
first, for twenty years, as the all-powerful minister of
Mahmud I (1246- 1266 a.d.), and then for another
twenty years as sovereign in his own right (1266- 1287
A.D.). He has earned for himself a reputation for
cruelty ; and the extreme severity of his treatment of
his foes is undeniable. But it only reflected the manners
of his time, and though it may not be justified, we can
understand it in view of the extreme difficulties of the
emperor's position. He had to protect his western
frontiers against the repeated inroads of the savage
Mughal hordes of Chingis Khan's successors, and within
the empire he had to suppress the chronic disaffection
of the Hindu chiefs, and keep down thepretensions of
his overbearing Turki governors and landholders. All
this had to be done at one and the same time : and this
sufficiently explains Balban's severity, without which he
could not have succeeded as he did. Yet his success did
not long survive him. After a feeble reign of three
years, his worthless grandson, Kaiqobad, was put to
death, in 1290 a.d., by his great officers of state, who
conferred the crown on one of themselves, the pious
and kindhearted Jalaluddin.
As emperor, Jalaluddin styled himself Firuz Shah
n. He was a Turki of the Khalji clan,
and his line accordingly is known as the Dynasty (1290-
Khalji dynasty. This dynasty reigned 132OA.D.)
for 30 years (1290-1320 a.d.) and com-
prised six members. Among these there was only one
who is of real importance— the third of the line, Alaud-
din Muhammad I (1296-1316 a.d.). During his long
reign of 20 years the Empire attained its greatest power
and its widest extent. In his personality and rule we
find, in most respects, a curious repetition of Balban.
He was as able and as strong as Balban, and even more
cruel than he, and like him he re-organized an empire
which he had received in a process of disintegration.
Having "stepped to the throne over the body of his uncle
whom he had treacherously murdered, he energetically
96
HISTORY OF INDIA.
set about the reconstruction of the empire. In 1298
A.D., Gujarat was re-conquered, Rajputana in 1300,
and Malwa in 1304. The mighty Mughal hordes which
in repeated invasions had ventured to advance to the
very gates of Delhi, were finally beaten off in 1305 a.d.
Intermediately, Muhammad I cruelly suppressed a
serious mutiny of his troops and several revolts of his own
kinsmen and nobles. At the same time he introduced
administrative reforms regulating agriculture and trade,
and by these means he effectually secured the stability of
his rule. Having accomplished all this, he again put his
hand to the ambitious plan of conquering Southern
India — a plan which he seems to have cherished from
the day of his capture of Devagiri in 1294 ^•^- This
is shown by his as-
suming the title of
Sikayidar as-Sani,
or the second
Alexander, on the
exceedingly nu-
merous gold and
silver coins, which
he struck from the
plunder of the vast
wealth of that place. He now despatched his general,
Mahk Kafur, on four expeditions into the Deccan. In
these he successively reduced to subjection the Yadavas
of Devagiri in 1307 A.D., the Kakatiyas of Warangal in
1 3 10, and the Hoysalas of Dvarasamudra in 1311. He
even made a plundering raid as far south as the Malabar
coast, near Madura. These expeditions, as we have seen
in the preceding chapter, put an end to the old Southern
Empire of the Hindus. They raised Muhammad Is
reign and the First Muliammadan Empire to the zenith
of their glory. The latter empire now rivalled that of
the Guptas by embracing nearly the whole of India ;
but, as was the case with the Gupta Empire, its sway was
neither effective nor enduring. South India acknowledged
Gold Sikandar as-Sani Coin of Muhammad I,
Ch. IXJ the early muhammadan period. 97
it only so long as she was overawed by the imperial
troops, and the outlying provinces, such as Bengal,
respected it hardly more than in name. Muhammad I,
whose master-mind alone held the empire together,
died of dropsy in 1316 a.d. After him, under his profli-
gate and faithless son Mubarak, there ensued a general
breakdown, both internal and external, which culminated
in 1320 A.D. in the extraordinary usurpation of the
throne by Mubarak's favourite, the utterly depraved and
low-caste Hindu, Khusru. A reaction was not long
delayed. Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq, the governor of the
Punjab, came to the rescue, and defeated and executed
the usurper in the same year.
Seeing that the Khalji House had been extermin-
ated by the usurper, Tughlaq himself
was called to the throne by the nobles TheKaraunaof
and officers of state. According to Ibn- Dy§asty'^a320-
Batuta he was a Karauna, i.e., of mixed 1414, A.D.)
Turki and Indian descent, and he thus
became the founder of the Karauna or Tughlaq-shahi
dynasty which reigned for nearly a century (1320-1414
A.D.) It gave to India, in Muhammad II, the son of
Tughlaq (1325-135 1 a.d.), the most striking figure among
the rulers of the first Muhammadan Empire. He was
a man of high culture, great intellect, and indomitable
will. His conduct was full of contradictions, acts
of extravagant generosity alternating with others of
incredible cruelty. Ibn-Batuta, the Arab traveller, who
visited his court in 1333 a.d., tells us that " at his gate
there might always be seen some faqir whom he had
enriched, or the corpse of some one whom he had slain."
His mind was that of a genius with a strain of madness.
The most striking administrative acts of his reign were
the attempted removal, in 1339 a.d., of the capital from
Delhi to the more centrally situated Devagiri which he
re-named Daulatabad, and the attempted enrichment,
in 1327 A.D., of the national exchequer by the introduc-
tion of a brass token currency. Both ideas were
98
HISTORY OF INDIA.
Brass Token of Muhammad II.
excellent in conception. Muhammad II rightly saw that
a vast and imperfectly-
welded empire such as
his required a central
capital and a well-filled
treasury. But the pro-
jects were enforced
with so little foresight
and brought so much
suffering on the people,
that they utterly failed
and had to be abandoned. When he recognized their
failure, Muhammed II was honest enough to frankly
abandon them. But the mischief was done ; nor could
he repair it by the confirmation of his sovereignty, which
he secured, in 1340 a.d., from the Khalifah of Egypt.
It resulted in the ruin of the magnificent empire which
he had inherited from his father. Bengal in 1339 a.d.,
and the Deccan in 1347, declared themselves indepen-
dent ; and when Muhammad II died in 1351 a.d., Oudh,
Malwa, Gujarat and Sindh w^ere in revolt. The further
disintegration of the empire was for a time averted by
the long and prosperous reign of his cousin, Firuz III
(1351-1388 A.D.). This mild and pious sovereign made
no attempt to recover the lost provinces, but applied
himself, with the help of his wise wazir, Maqbul Khan,
to the better development of those that still remained
to him. His chief measures for this purpose were the
abolition of certain oppressive taxes, the construction of
the still-existing Great Jumna Canal and other irrigation
works, the reclamation of waste lands, and the founding
of new towns, colleges, serais and other public buildings.
On the other hand, the mildness of his rule, combined
with his system of granting whole provinces in fief to
successful courtiers, directly contributed to the final
break-up of the empire, which ensued soon after his death
in 1 388 A.D. His sons and grandsons, six of whomreigned
after him, were unable to maintain their authority over
Ch. IX.] THE EARLY MUHAMMADAN PERIOD. 99
the viceroys of Oudh, Malwa, Gujarat, and the Western
Marches, Between 1394 and 1401, these, one after the
other, turned their fiefs into independent kingdoms.
They thus reduced the imperial possessions so much that
these hardly comprised more than the home province of
Delhi, that is the Doab and Rohtak. The general turmoil
of the time reached its climax in the fearful invasion of
Timur, the celebrated Mughal leader, who captured Delhi
in December 1398 a.d. The invasion lasted only six
months ; but the incredible devastation which Timur left
in his track, earned for him the name of "the Scourge
of God."
With the death, in 14 1 2 A.D. , of Mahmud II, a grand-
son of Firuz III, the Empire virtually
came to an end. In mere name, it is The Dissolution
true, it continued to exist for a little more Emp^p^ Third
than another century, but in reality it
was now divided into a number of independent kingdoms.
These were the territory of Delhi, which nominally
represented the Empire, and the kingdoms of Oudh,
Malwa, and Gujarat. To them must be added the king-
doms of Bengal and the Deccan, which, as we have seen,
had already become separate under Muhammad II.
In 1414 A D. Khisr Khan, who had been the governor
of Multan, took possession of Delhi,
and founded the so-called Sayvid dy- The Kingdoni of
nasty. It numbered four members, Jj)^ ^^^^'^'^^^^
whose feeble efforts were limited to
keeping a hold on the small territory which still laid claim
to the name of " Empire." It was put an end to in 1451
A.D., by Buhlol Lodi, the Afghan governor of Lahore.
During his long reign of 38 years he succeeded in
re-annexing to the empire the kingdom of Jaunpur. But
the revival of its authority did not outlive his reign, and
under his son, Ibrahim II, the third and last of the Lodi
dynasty, the First Muhammadan Empire was finally
extinguished in 1526 a.d., by Babar, who founded the
Second Muhammadan Empire of the Mughals.
100
HISTORY OF INDIA.
The kingdom of Jaunpur roughly coincided with
what is now called Oudh. It had been
The Kingdom of one of the great fiefs of the empire,
n394'^7"A if) '^^l^o^^ governor, Malik Sarwar, assumed
independence in 1394 a.d., during the
troublous time under Firuz Ill's feeble successors. He
founded the so-
called Sharqi, or
Eastern, dynasty,
which included six
members. Only
one of these, how-
ever, the third of
the Ime, Ibrahim,
was of any import-
ance. He greatly
extended his bor-
ders, and at one
time came near to
"%i^ making himself
a Emperor of Delhi.
His long reign of
39 years (1 40 1 -1 440
A.D.lisdistinguish-
the finest specimens
Atala Mosque.
ed by the erection of some of
of Muslim architecture, such as the Atala Mosque, with
which he adorned his capital Jaunpur. After him the
dynasty rapidly declined, till, in 1487 a.d., the kingdom
was re-annexed to the empire by Buhlol Lodi.
The kingdom of Malwa arose in 1401 a.d., when
its governor, Dilawar Khan, said to have
been a descendant of the old Ghori I^f^*"^^4m °'
emperors, made himself independent. issqTa.d!)
The Ghori line, however, was supplanted,
in 1436 A.D., by the Khalji dynasty of Mahmud. Under
these two dynasties, the kingdom of Malwa, owing to
its position between the warring states of Delhi, Jaunpur,
and Gujarat, was able to maintain only a precarious
Ch. IX.] THE EARLY MUHAMMADAN PERIOD. lOI
existence, down to 1530 A.D , when it was annexed by
the neighbouring kings of Gujarat.
The latter province broke away from the Empire
as an independent kingdom about the
same time as Oudh and Malwa. Zafar P?^^"^^°E«^
Khan, to whom Firuz III had granted i57^2^a^D.)
the fief of Gujarat, assumed independ-
ence, in 1396 A.D., under the style of Muzaffar I. For
nearly two centuries thirteen of his descendants ruled
ithe kingdom, down to 1572 a.d , when it was annexed
jby Akbar to the Mughal Empire. The greatest among
them was Bahadur Shah ( 1 526-1 536 A D.), who annexed
the kingdom of Malwa. In 1535 he lost his territories
to Humayun, but recovered them in the same year with
the assistance of the Portuguese, to whom he ceded the
island of Diu.
The Empire had never had, for any length of time,
an effective control over Bengal. Its
governors ruled mostly in a state of semi- The Kingdom
independence. In 1338 a.d., however, Jissg^is^ A.D.)
the governor of Eastern Bengal assumed
full independence; and in 1339 A. D., the governor of
Western Bengal followed his example. Both portions
of Bengal were united in 1352 a.d. under the rule of
Shamsuddin Ilyas; and his dynasty continued to reign,
with a short interruption of about three years, down to
1487 a.d. Thenceforward Bengal was ruled successively
by four different dynasties, down to 1577 a.d., when
it was annexed by Akbar to the Mughal Empire.
Equally weak was the hold of the Empire on the
Deccan. In 1347 A.D, Hasan Gangu,
called Bahman Shah, assumed royalty at The King-dom of
Khulbarga. His dynasty, known as the (i^7_i52^6^A.D.)
Bahmani, reigned for nearly two centu-
ries. Under Muhammad II (1463-1482) the kingdom
attained its widest extension, and included the whole of
the Deccait north of Mysore. Shortly afterwards, how-
ever, it began to fall to pieces, through the several
102 HISTORY OF INDIA.
provincial governors assuming independence. Thus
there arose five new states. These were : —
1. Berar, under the Imad-shahis (1485-1572 a.d.).
2. Ahmadnagar, under the Nizam-shahis (1490-
1636 A.D.).
5. Bijapur, under the Adil-shahis (1490-1686 a.d.).
4. Bidar, under the Barid-shahis (1492-1609 A.D.).
5. Golkonda, under the Qutb-shahis (1512-1687
A.D.).
All these states, as we shall see in the next chapter,
were ultimately absorbed into the Mughal Empire.
The country to the south of the Bahmani kingdom
had attained its independence some-
The Hindu King- what earlier. It was about 1336 a.d.,
naffap^^dsH^^^" ^^"''^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^ subversion of the
1565 A.D.) Hoysala kingdom by Muhammad I,
that a Hindu chief, called Harihara I,
was appointed by him to govern a part of the
country. About 1343 a.d., having formed a con-
federacy of Hindu princes, Harihara I expelled the
Muhammadans, and greatly enlarged his territory.
His nephew, Harihara II, about 1379 a.d., assumed
independent royalty, making the newly-founded town
of Vijayanagar his capital. He gradually enlarged
his kingdom so much that it embraced not only Mysore
but also practically the whole of the country to the south
of it. For about two hundred years, during which it was
ruled by two different Hindu dynasties, it maintained its
power in constant warfare with its northern Muhamma-
dan neighbours. At last it was overpowered, in 1565
A.D., in the battle of Talikot, by the combined armies of
Ahmadnagar, Bijapur, and Golkonda. But the Muham-
madan confederates, divided by mutual jealous}', were
unable to annex more than a very small part of the
kingdom. The rest of its territory remained in the hands
of petty Hindu chiefs, while a representative of the old
dynasty removed to Chandragiri, and there founded a
new line of petty kings. It was from a member of this
Ch. IX.] THE EARLY MUHAMMADAN PERIOD. 103
line that the English received, in 1639 a.d., a grant of
the site of Madras.
The establishment of the Bijapur state has a special
interest through its connection with the
foundation of the Portuguese Eastern th^P^t^^^^^ ^^
Empire. The Portuguese, as will be ^^ ug-uese,
more fully told in Chapter XI, first arrived in India in
1498 A.D., m which year Vasco da Gama landed in
Cahcut, the capital of a petty Hindu state. Failing to
establish themselves there they proceeded, under the
celebrated Admiral Alfonso d' Albuquerque, to Goa, which
was comprised in the Bijapur territory. This place was
captured by them in 15 10 a.d., and henceforth formed
the capital of the Portuguese possessions in India.
It remains briefly to review the general condition
of the people during this period of Turki
rule. The form of government was auto- The condition
cratic ; the emperor's will was absolute. °nd^^ ^the^^
In theor}', no doubt, it was restricted by Turki Empire,
the equitable principles of Muhammadan
law, but there was no means of enforcing on the emperor
those restrictions. Whether his rule was benevolent or
oppressive depended entirely on his personal character.
On the other hand, in either case, it affected equally
the Muhammadan and the Hindu ; religion made no
material difference. Moreover, the arbitrary and oppres-
sive nature of the Turki rule made itself felt principally
in relation to those who were in a position to exercise
any political influence. The condition of the ordinary
population, as we know from contemporary writers,
such as the Arab Ibn-Batuta (about 1340 A.D.), and the
Italian Nicolo Conti (about 1430 A.D.), w^as practically
free from oppression. Of course, this remark applies
more praticularly to such benevolent reigns as those of
Firuz II of the Khalji and Firuz III of the Karauna
dynasties. But the mischief of the despotic Turki rule
was that *the periods of benevolent reign only served to
encourage the numerous Rajput chiefs to attempt
104 HISTORY OF INDIA.
independence, and the Muhammadan grandees to
intrigue against the throne. These, in their turn, neces-
sarily produced reigns of excessive cruelty and oppres-
sion such as were those of Muhammad I of the Khalji
and Muhammad II of the Karauna dynasties. It was
this regular alternation of benevolence and tyranny
which caused the ruin of the Turki Empire,
Islam, as we have seen in the last chapter, was
introduced only in a limited sense by force.
Islam^^^ The Hindu population was offered the
choice of conversion or the payment of
the poll-tax. In the former case the converts enjoyed
the privileges of the ruling class, and it can readily
be understood that not a few of the old ruling classes
among the Hindus preferred the adoption of the
Muslim faith to sinking into the abject position of
a subject class. In addition to these Hindu converts,
the invading armies themselves gave rise to considerable
colonies of Turki and Afghan settlers. Both causes
combined explain the large proportion of Musalmans in
the population of those parts of India which came under
the direct rule of the Turki Empire. Outside its limits,
in such provinces as, for example, Rajputana, Bundel-
khand and Mysore, where the old Hindu ruling houses
continued to exist in semi-independence, the religious
and social state of the people remained practically the
same as before the Muhammadan conquest. Even in
the Empire proper, though the Hindu was regarded
with some contempt, he was, ordinarily, not treated with
hostility. He was liable to the jiziya, but he was not
molested in his religion or in his social customs. In fact
many Hindus were employed, and rose to high office, in
the revenue and accounts departments of the government;
and though in civil cases, as a rule, the Muhammadan
law was administered by the Qazi, criminal and adminis-
trative cases were dealt with by the emperor's officers
in accordance with a kind of common law, founded on
old Indian custom and the sovereign's discretion. The
Ch. IX.] THE EARLY MUHAMMADAN PERIOD. 105
prosperity of the country is evidenced by the private
and public buildings, irrigation work, bridges, serais, and
hospitals, which were constructed throughout the empire.
Hinduism, which we saw established in India in
the course of the preceding period, natur-
ally declined with the advance of Islam. Hinduism and
It was only in the extreme south, in the Learnfnff
Hindu kingdom of Vijayanagar, beyond
the depressing influence of the Muhammadan Empire,
that it showed any signs of vigorous life. There we find,
about 1350 A.D., the two famous brothers, Madhava and
Sayana — both ministers at the Vijayanagar court. The
former wrote the Sarvadarsa?ia Saiigraha, or Compen-
dium of all Speculations, and other philosophical works,
while the second was the author of the celebrated com-
mentary on the Vedas. To the earlier Chola kingdom
in the South, Hinduism owed its eventual revival in
Northern India. Ramanuja, the great Vishnava re-
former, lived there in the twelfth century, and from him
were spiritually descended Ramananda and Chaitanya,
the apostles of the two branches of Vaishnavism in
Hindustan and Bengal respectively. The former, who
hved chiefly at Benares, in the beginning of the fifteenth
century, was the zealous propagator of devotion to
Rama, while his contemporary, Chaitanya, a Brahman
of Nadiya, inspired by the tender sonnets of the famous
poet Vidyapati to an enthusiastic cult of Krishna, became
the founder of the Vaishnava sect of Bengal. About
the same time, one of Ramananda's disciples, Kabir, a
weaver of Benares, began to preach a more eclectic
form of Hinduism, which by its insistence on simplicity
and probity, appealed to both Hindus and Musal-
mans, and thus gave rise to the wide-spread sect of
Kabirpanthis.
Many of the Muhammadan rulers of this period —
emperors as well as kings — were great
patrons of art and learning. Numerous cuitu^™^*^^^
Persian historians flourished at their
io6
HISTORY OF INDIA.
courts. Every great reign had its own historian. Among
the more prominent hterary men may be mentioned
Minhajuddin, the historian (about 1240 A.D.), Amir
Khusran, the poet (1300 A.D.), and Ibn-Batula, the tra-
veller (about 1335 A.D.). Some of the most beautiful
architectural monuments were erected during this period.
Thus in 1235 A.D., the famous Qutb Minar near Delhi
was built by Altamsh in memory of the Musalman saint
Qutbuddin. In 14 18 Ibrahim, the Sharqi king, erected
the beautiful
Atala Mosque
in Jaunpur, and
in 1526 A.D.,
Nasrat Shah of
Bengal, built
the so-called
" Great Golden
Mosque " at
Gaur. The Em-
peror Altamsh
started a new
Tanka of the Emperor Altamsh.
Indian currency of broad silver pieces, called Tanka,
which are the ancestors of the modern rupee. The
empire even gave birth to a new language, the well-
known Urdu or Hindustani, which still serves as a kind
of lingua franca for the most part of In dia. It arose in
the thirteenth century, after the conquest of the old Hindu
kingdom of Kanauj, from the vernacular dialect of
which it was formed by combination with the Persian
language of the Muhammadan conquerors.
CHAPTER X.
The Later Muhammadan Period. :
Section !♦
The Fourth Indian, Second Muhammadan, or Mughal, Empire,
About IS 26 — iSoj A.D.
IT has already been mentioned that in 1399 Timur
invaded India. He did not, however, gain any
territories. It was left for one of his descendants to
establish a glorious empire such as had never yet been
in Hindustan. This descendant was Babar,
Babar, 1526-1530.— Babar, i.e., the Lion, was born
in 1482, and was the sixth in descent
from Timur. When he v.-as only twelve Babar.
years of age his father died, and he
began to rule the small kingdom of Farghana on the
Yaxartes, 1494. He
conquered Samar-
khand in 1497, and
was made ruler of
Kabul in 1 504.
Daulat Khan Lodi,
the Governor of the
Punjab, unable to
resist Ibrahim Lodi II
of Delhi sinj^le-hand-
ed, invited Babar to
come to his assistance.
Accordingly in 1526,
at the head of a large
army, Babar entered
India with his son,
Huma)'un ; defeated
Ibrahim Lodi II. in
the First Battle of
Emperor Babar. Panipat ; seized the
I08 HISTORY OF INDIA.
throne of Delhi, and put an end to the Lodi dynasty.
The brave Rajputs of Chittor, under Rana Sangram Sinha
of Mewar, tried to drive him out of India, but they
were defeated in the battle of Fatehpur Sikri near Agra,
1527. Babar died in 1530, shortly after he had subdued
Bihar, and before he could introduce a system of
government The provinces which he acquired in India
were bound together merely by the fact that they
belonged to a common master.
Humayun, 1530-1556. — Babar was succeeded by
his son Humayun, the story of whose
Humayun and reign, however, belongs mainly to Kabul.
onhe^Mughals! ^^ ^P^" ^^ ^""^ ^^^^ to the throne, he
had to give up that kingdom and West-
ern Punjab to his brother Kumran. He was thus cut off
from the land of his fathers, while at the same time he
had powerful enemies to encounter in India. Chief
among these was Sher Khan, the Afghan jagirdar of
Saseram in Bihar. Making himself master of Bihar,
Jaunpur, and parts of Bengal and Oudh, he finally de-
feated Humayun at Kanauj (1540). Unable to continue
the struggle, Humayun fled to Persia, and on the way
' a son — tireliHous~Slc5ar — was born to
Sher Khan's him at Amarkot in Sindh. Having esta-
E'^<Pf'^®r;^'^"l!I^H" blished his supremacy in the tract of
stpation and , . | 4.1 at 1 j j
Character. country lymg between the Narbada and
the Himalayas, Sher Khan proclaimed
himself emperor under the name of Sher Shah, and set
up the Sur dynasty. His own reign lasted from 1540
to 1545, and he ruled over the Punjab, Bihar, Marvvar,
Chittor, and Bengal. His administration was based
upon the principle of unit3^ He rendered life and
property secure by putting down all violent crime ; and
though his subjects feared to oppose his will, he did not
oppress the Hindus. He divided his territories into
many parganahs in order that they might be properly-
administered. Between Bengal and the north-west
Ch. X.] THE LATER MUHAMMADAN PERIOD. IO9
frontier he had many roads made, and along them he
had trees planted, wells dug, rest-houses and mosques
built. He introduced a system of post for the con-
veyance of letters. The law of Islam he replaced by a
civil and criminal code of his own. He died of injuries
received in the storming of Kalinjar (1545). On the
whole he was a good ruler, and his occasional treachery
and self-will were redeemed by the good government
he bestowed on his subjects.
His son, Islam Shah, succeeded him, and ruled for
nine years (1545-1554), and the throne ^^.^^.. „^
then passed to Muhammad Adil Shah, fhe MifghSs
This king left all real power in the
hands of the Hindu Wazir, Hemu. Naturally rebellions
arose. Ibrahim Sur seized Delhi and Agra, but he did
not long enjoy his new possessions, for they were taken
from him by Sikandar Sur who had already proclaimed
himself king in the Punjab. News of all this and of
other rivalries, reached Huma^un in Persia, and he re-,
garded it as a favourable opportunilyjto tr}^o win backj
India for himself. Accordingly, in 1555, he returned
with his son, Akbar, and a large army which he had
received from Shah Tahmasp, the Shah of Persia. He
retook Kabul, but as the country was not quelled he
entrusted the campaign against Sikandar Sur in the
Punjab to Akbar and his Ataliq, Bairam Khan. The
young prince, however, had to give up his operations
against Sikandar, in order that he might check Hemu,
the former Wazir of Muhammad Adil Shah, who was
marching on Agra with a large army, ostensibly in the
interests of the Sur dynasty. By the time Akbar
reached Jalandhar, Hemu had taken Agra, an advantage
which he improved by occupying Delhi, where he pro-
claimed himself Raja. Akbar hastened on to Delhi :
defeated Hemu, in the Second Battle of Panipat (5th
Nov. 1556), and recovered Agra. This done, with
Bairam Khan, he turned upon Sikandar Sur, and even-
tually became master of the Punjab. Thus was the
no
HISTORY OF INDIA.
Mughal dynasty restored to power in Hindustan, and
Hunia^mn sat on the throne from which, sixteen years
previously, he had been driven. But he was not to reign
long. Within six months he slipped^ on the marble
steps of his palace in Delhi, and died from the injuries
he received. Akbar was at Kalanaur in pursuit of the
vanquished Sikandar when tidings reached him of his
father's death, and he returned to Delhi.
Akbar's
Minority
Akbar, 1556-1605.— When he came to the throne,
Akbar was only sixteen years of age ; but
he had already commanded troops, and
been at the head of public affairs. His
Ataliq, Bairam Khan, seems to have kept a strict hand
over him. This the
spirited prince resent-
ed, and as soon as he
attained the age of
twenty he took over
the government from
Bairam Khan who had
hitherto ruled in his
name. This displeased
Bairam Khan. He re-
volted ; was defeated ;
and pardoned. He set
out on a pilgrimage to
Mecca ; but was killed
on the way by an
Afghan whose father
he had put to death.
Flaving established
himselfupon the throne,
Akbar now began to con-
solidate his empire. Up to 1567 he was occupied in settling
his eastern territories around Allahabad,
StndSftln ind Benares, and Lucknow. Thdn he took
the Deeean. Mewar from Udai Singh, a Rajput chief.
Emperor Akbar.
CH. X.] THE LATER MUHAMMADAN PERIOD. Ill
To cement a friendship with these brave people, he mar-
ried two Rajput princesses, one of whom became the
mother of Jahangir. In 1572 Gujarat was annexed, and
Akbar found himself master of Western India. Broach
and Surat were next added to his kingdom. Thus in the
eighteenth year of his reign Akbar ruled over Kabul,
the Punjab, North-Western India, Western India and
Central India. Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa were still
independent under Daud Khan, a king of Afghan birth.
Akbar determined that they should form part of his
empire, and so he led his army to Patna. The city fell,
and all Bihar became his. Daud was pursued as far
as Cuttack, and Bengal too acknowledged the rule of
Akbar. Daud again revolted in 1577, was put to death,
and Orissa passed into Akbar's hands. Revolts, how-
ever, took place in this and in various other parts of the
country till 1580 ; but from that date till 1586 there was
practically, peace within
the empire. Akbar next
took Kathiwar, Sindh
and Kashmir. later on,
in 1600, in order to
secure his southern
.,, , ^,,,, ,, ,• frontier, he annexed the
Akbar s Gold Medal commemorating . '
the'Faii of Asirgarh. provmce of Kandcsh and
a portion of Berar in
the northern part of the Deccan. In Kandesh he
captured the famous rocky fortress of Asirgarh, and in
Berar, the celebrated stronghold of Ahmadnagar, where
the warlike queen, Chand Bibi, made a stubborn resis-
tance. In the closing years of his reign his son, Salim,
afterwards known as the Emperor Jahangir, rebelled ; but
was forgiven. Akbar died in 1605, ^^ ^^^^ ^g^ o^ ^3 years.
Akbar was above all things bent upon consoHdating
hisempire. He felt that, if there was ever ,
to be rest and peace in the land, there ary Sys^m and
must be.only one master in it. He deter- Administpation
mined to be that master. So he waged
112 HISTORY OF INDIA.
«
war on his neighbours, and annexed territory after
territory, in order that he might ultimately establish
peace. His possessions north of the Vindhya Range
were divided into twelve provinces, each under a viceroy
who was responsible solely to the emperor. Subordinate
to the viceroy were local military officers, C3.\\ed fa i/jdars,
who performed the duties of chiefs of police and of
military commanders. The portion of the empire south
of the Vindhya Range was similarly divided into six
provinces. As soon as he gained a new tract of country
he tried to win the good will of its people by respecting
their religion, and by arranging marriages between the
daughters of the conquered Houses and the princes ot
his Court. To the influential men of newly-acquired
countries were given important offices in the army and
government. To surround himself with a body of loyal
nobles, drawn from every race, he established a feudal
aristocracy, called maasabdars. They enjoyed their
salaries, or grants of lands, at the emperor's pleasure
and in return rendered him military service. Moreover,
the families of the conquered were not allowed to be
sold into slavery. By such measures he converted
enemies into allies, and robbed defeat of much of its
bitterness. He withdrew the jiziya, and abolished all
taxes on Hindu pilgrims, as well as all inland tolls.
And although in courts of justice the law rested on the
Q'ran, mercy always tempered justice. He tolerated all
religions, for he felt that there was some truth in every
Faith. He examined all creeds, and taking from each
what he thought good and true, he made the Din-i-Ilahi,
or the Divine Faith, of which he was the head. The
learned in his court met week by week in the Ibadat
Khana to discuss questions on religion, politics, and
philosophy. Thus Akbar was far-sighted in his policy.
Instead of driving his adversaries to desperation by the
severity of his measures, he reconciled them to their
defeat by letting them practise the religion and ^.ustoms
of their forefathers so long as they recognised in him
Ch. X.] THE LATER MUHAMMADAN PERIOD. II3
their sole and paramount ruler. And so successfully did
he gain the loyal adherence of various castes and creeds,
that during his reign India was free from foreign in-
vasions and enjoyed a season of internal tranquillity.
Akbar rewarded merit in Hindus no less than in
Muhammadans. To Bhagwan Das,
Man Singh, Todar Mall, Jhi Mall and Some celebrated
Birbal— all Hindus-he gave high ^^^^^^^ Akbar's
commands in his army and influential
places at his court. Moreover, he encouraged learning.
And during his reign such Sanskrit works as the Rama-
yana and Mahabharata were translated into Persian.
The two brothers, Faizi and Abul Fazl, were his intimate
friends. Faizi was a poet, and had a valuable library of
manuscripts. Abul Fazl wrote in the Akbar Namah,
a history of Akbar's reign. Badauni wrote his
Muntakhahah-ut-Tawariq which gives us an account of
Akbar's religious views, as also sketches of the famous
men of his reign.
Akbar reformed the way in which the taxes of his
empire were gathered. Before his reign
it had been the rule for the governors cJ5<S^E!^ Revenue
.11 /• , • ^ System,
to gather the taxes or their own provin-
ces, pay themselves and their army, and then send the
balance to the emperor at Delhi. Under the advice of
his great Hindu minister, Todar Mall, all taxes were
now paid into the Royal Treasury at Agra, so that all
payments might be made from there. The empire was
divided into fifteen siibhas or provinces, each of which
had a governor to maintain the peace, and a dizvan to
^v.^/,j^ ^^-y-^ collect the re-
/0i?'^*K. ^;^'|:Jl'^r%v. venue. That the
•iiX^^^'^m Mf> ■■ might be fair, he
'^q^jif}:^}^/ had the country
'""^' -—-''/' . ^ ._, surveyed, and he
' "ir' ' took rent in
Akbar's Coin. money instead of
.V
114 HISTORY OF INIDA.
in grain. The taxes and land revenue of 1594 gave him
an income of ;^36,ooo,ooo which at the present rate of
exchange is Rs. 545,000,000.
Akbar attempted reforms also in social matters.
He would not allow people to be tortured to extract a
confession; he forbade animal sacrifices
social Retorms. ^^^ ^j^.j^ marriage. He made widow-
marriage lawful, and although he could not stop Sati, he
commanded that the widow was not to be forced to
burn herself with her husband's corpse.
Jahang-ir, 1605-1628.— Salim, the favourite son of
Akbar, succeeded his father, and assumed
Nur Jahan!'^^^' ^^^^ ^^^'^ ^^ Jahangir, that is to say, the
Conqueror of the World. He formed a
striking contrast to his father, being wilful, indolent and
self-indulgent. His temper was violent and uncertain.
He was prone to be arbitrary. He was addicted to
strong drink, but could abstain from it when occasion
demanded sobriety. As he grew older and approached
the end of his reign his habits improved. The change
in his character was largely due to the influence which
his beautiful wife, Nur Jahan (The Light of the World),
had on him. For the
Y/>i-'vl^X .'.^^>''f*/-'X greater part of his
•fi^'^i^A ^/2^l<^^J>h feign, wiih the help
of her brother, Asaf
Khan, she practically
ruled the empire.
This was possible
Coin of Jahangir and Nur Jahan. becaUSe Jahangir waS
too fond of wine and
too indolent to trouble himself with the weighty matters
of government. He openly recognised his queen's share
in the administration of affairs, by placing her name on
the coins of the realm. In 1628 his revenue from land
was Rs. 295,200,000.
In 161 5 King James I. of England sent Sir Thomas
Ch. X] THE LATER MUHAMMADAN PERIOD
115
Embassy of Sip Roe as ambassador to the Mughal
Thomas Roe. court of Delhi. He was received with
much courtesy by Jahangir, but he entirely failed in the
object of his mission — to secure protection against the
exactions of Mughal officials.
Jahangir had sufficient good sense to continue his
father's policy of religious toleration. On the whole the
earlier part of his reign was peaceful and prosperous ; but
later on the question of succession stirred up jealousy
and hatred in his sons.
aa*;i'^^. .^^^^.ir-ytf,
The Taj Mahal.
Shah Jahan, 1628-1658. — Shah Jahan, who suc-
ceeded to the throne, was in the main
a kind and just man. Throughout his Attempted Con-
reign t'fle Deccan was disturbed bv wars T^®^^ o' the
and rebellions. In 1635 he compelled
beeean.
ii6
HISTORY OF INDIA.
Shah Jahan
founds New Delhi
and adorns Agra
with noble Build-
ings.
the Adil Sahi king of Bijapur to pay a large annual
tribute, and a year later annexed the Nizam Shahi king-
dom of Ahmadnagar, He then deputed his son,
Aurangzeb, to wage war against Bijapur and Golkonda.
Meanwhile the English, who had come in 1600, were
extending their trade, and in 1640 they made a factory
for themselves at Hughli.
Shah Jahan was fond of pomp and show. He
adorned Agra with many noble build-
ings. He founded New Delhi, and
there erected the Jumma Masjid —
one of the largest and most beautiful
mosques in Asia, the Diwan-i-Am, or
Hall of Public
Audience, and the
Diwan-i-Khas or
Hall of Private
Audience. In the
Divvan-i-Am he
placed the famous
Peacock throne. It
was made of gold,
and was set with
so many precious
stones that it was
worth an enormous
sum of money. It
Teheran.
Masjid, and the Taj
Jumma Masjid.
IS
now
At
Mahal.
Mahal.
in the Shah's palace at
Agra he built the Moti
The Taj is over the grave of his wife Mumtaj
It is one of the most beautiful buildings in the
world, being overlaid with white marble. In 1655 his
land revenue yielded Rs. 450,000,000.
When Shah Jahan became feeble through old age,
he practically retired from public life
hilsol^r ^"^°°^ and committed public affairs to his
eldest son, Dara. But this prince's
brothers, Shuja, Aurangzeb, and Murad, were not
Ch. X.] THE LATER MUHAMMADAN PERIOD. II7
prepared to let him ascend the throne without mak-
ing a bid for it themselves. Murad proclaimed
hmiself king in
Gujarat, and with '
the assistance of
Aurangzeb routed
the imperial forces
near Ujjain. But
Aurangzeb all the
time had his own
scheme in hand.
He suddenly made
Murad captive ;
seized the palace ;
placed himself on
the throne ; and
sent his aged father. Shah Jahan, to prison, where he
was kindly treated till his death in 1666. Dara and
iMurad were put
fujvJUdi^^^: to death. Shuja,
" '- — ^^.j^Q during the
scrimmage for
supreme power
had declared him-
self king in
Bengal, was de-
feated at Agra,
Di\van-i-Am.
Gold Coin of Shah Jahan.
— __Q.„
and escaping to Arakan was never heard of again.
Having thus established himself upon the throne,
Aurangzeb removed the capital of his empire from Agra
to New Delhi.
A French Doctor, Francois Bernier, about this time
resided at Delhi where he was physician
to the Emperor Aurangzeb. He Bernier.
travelled from place to place, and on
his return to Europe he published an account of all he
had seenlduring his stay in India, and a full and graphic
description of the Courts of Shah Jahan and Aurangzeb.
ii8
HISTORY OF INDIA.
THE MUGHAL EMPIRE
THE TIME OF AuRANGZEB,
iroo.
Ch. X.] THE LATER MU HAM MA DAN PERIOD. II9
Aupang-zeb (op Alamg-ir I), 1658-1707— As a
young man Aurangzeb had taken a con-
spicuous part in his father's government. Aurangzeb's
When only eighteen years old he had jahan's" G^o^v^^
been employed as governor of the Dec- ernment.
can ; but he had resigned the appoint-
ment to become a hermit. The attractions of asceticism,
however, had quickly faded, and within a year he had
re-entered his father's service as governor of Gujarat.
Then from 1647 to 1652 he had been engaged in expedi-
tions into Balkh and Kandahar. The campaigns, though
unsuccessful, had afforded him a military training, in
consequence of which he had next been set to the task
of reducing the kingdoms of Golkonda and Bidar in the
Deccan. In this he succeeded, being helped by Mir
Jumla the Wazir of Golkonda. He was occupied with
the conquest of Bijapur, the capital of the Adil Shahi
kingdom, when his father's illness compelled him to
leave it to the tender mercies of Sivaji, in order that he
himself might enter upon the fratricidal struggle which
gave him the throne.
Encouraged by the withdrawal of the Mugnal troops
from Bijapur, Sivaji became more daring,
and beiran to raid even the emperor's War with the
IVi 51 r'Ji^nJ-iQ in
territories in the Deccan. Success smil- ^^^ Deeean.
ed upon him for a time. He defeated
Aurangzeb's army at Poona, and requited his known
bigotry by sacking Sarat, "the Gate of Pilgrimage to
Mecca." " But eventually the tide of war turned against
the Maratha chieftain, and he had to sue for peace. He
surrendered several of his forts, and his professions of
submission were rewarded with the vicero\ alty of the
Deccan. He actually proceeded to Delhi to pay homage
to the Emperor. But Aurangzeb treated him slight-
ingly, and the "mountain rat" in indignation escaped to
his fort in the Western Ghats, more determined than
ever to Ife an implacable enemy. He accordingly re-
sumed hostilities, and so prospered, that the Emperoi
120 HISTORY OF INDIA.
was compelled to acknowledge him as a Raja, and to
pacify him with an extensive /a^/r in Berar. But the
love of adventure and plunder was too strong in Sivaji
for him long to lead a peaceful life. He soon summoned
his followers and pillaged Surat, Khandesh, and Broach,
enriching himself with chant {ie., one-fourth of the
revenues) as he went along. Death, however, now cut
short his career, and his son, Sambhaji continued to
harass the Mughal Emperor. Aurangzeb finally decided
that his own presence in the Deccan was needed before the
Marathas could be repressed, and so he proceeded thither
to take command of his troops. He pursued his enemies
through the Konkan. But it was not of much use. The
Marathas never fought a pitched battle. Their plain was
suddenly to fall upon unsuspecting foes, scatter them,
and overspread the country, burning, pillaging and des-
troying all that came in their way. As unexpectedly as
they appeared so suddenly they dispersed, and gathered
again in their mountain recesses. Deprived of all means
of direct retaliation, Aurangzeb decided upon crippling
their resources by annexing Golkonda and Bijapur which
paid them tribute. Both kingdoms were accordingly
annexed, and their Adil Shahi and Qutb Shahi dynasties
came to an end. The Maratha cause was not now
prospering ; but worse was in store, for in 1689 Sambhaji
fell into the Emperor's hands, and was put to death.
Still the Marathas were far from cr\ished. For seventeen
years longer they continued to be i thorn in Aurangzeb's
side, and, indeed, when he died in 1707 he was still in
harness, vainly trying to hunt them down iVom their rocky
retreats. It was during this struggle, in 1690, that he
granted the English land at Sutanati, our modern Calcutta.
As will presently be more fully explained, Aurangzeb
was a bigoted V. uhammadan. His
Rajput Revolt, persecution of the H. ndus alienated them
. from him, and dro^e the Rajputs into
rebellion. Not satisfied with re-imposing the ^Jiziya, in
his fanatical zeal for the spread of his own Faith, he
Ch. IX.] THE LATER MUHAMMADAN PERIOD, 121
attempted to get possession of the two sons of Jeswant
Singh, the Rajput Maharaja of Marwar. He wished to
have them educated at Delhi, and presumably brought
up as Musalmans. The Rajputs were infuriated at this,
and not only refused to pay the tax, but also hid the
princes. Thereupon Aurangzeb marched upon Raj putana,
where the states of Udaipur (Mewar) and Jodhpur
(Marwar) offered him armed resistance. What made
their opposition the more bitter was that the Emperor's
son, Akbar, joined them. But Aurangzeb contrived to
make it appear that the prince was a traitor in their
camp, and the luckless youth, thus outwitted by his
father, had to seek safety in flight to the Deccan. The
Delhi army ravaged Udaipur ; but, as all his attention
was called for in the Deccan, Aurangzeb willingly made
peace. No treaty, however, could heal the wounded
feelings of the Rajputs, and all Rajputana — save only
Jaipur which had sided with the Emperor — continued
in a state of perpetual revolt even long after Aurangzeb's
death.
To understand Aurangzeb's statemanship it is neces-
sary to remember that he was an in-
tolerant Muhammadan of the Sunni Charaeter and
sect. He was a pronounced Image- Aurangzeb.^
Breaker, and the relentless persecutor of
all who belonged to a different Faith. The result was
that his religious zeal wrecked his kingdom. Instead
of adopting the conciliatory policy of Akbar, or the
good-natured indifference of Jahangir, or the splendid
magnificence of Shah Jahan, he pulled down Hindu
temples, and on their sites, and with their materials, he
raised Muhammadan mosques. Not satisfied with this
assertion of his own rehgion, he revived the hated jiziya,
and re-imposed taxes on Hindu pilgrims. In 1697 his
revenue, from all sources, amounted to Rs. 1,350,000,000.
The strength of Akbar's government lay in his policy of
uniting* naturally hostile elements into a peaceful
organism. Aurangzeb began the disintegration of the
K
122
HISTORY OF INDIA.
Mughal dynasty by resolving that organism once more
into its antagonistic constituents. A contemporary
Muhammadan historian wrote: "Every plan that he
formed came to little good; every enterprise failed" —
failed because the Emperor had not the good will of his
subjects. When he lay dying there was disorder in the
north ; the Marathas were making a desert of the Deccan ;
the Rajputs were in
\jj
/•»
^^1^
Aurangzeb's Coin.
open rebellion ; the
Jats had taken up
arms near Agra ; the
Sikhs were turbulent
in Multan ; and the
imperial army was
ready to mutiny for
arrears of pay. He
meant to be a righteous and impartial ruler, but he was
blinded by his bigotry. He trusted no one ; and no one
loved him. He was obliged to protect himself by
maintaining a large standing army, and by surrounding
himself with a host of civil officers and retainers, who
owed their all to him. And even in this his method
differed from Akbar's policy. Whereas the latter had
secured the loyal adhesion of Hindu Chiefs and nobles
by giving them responsible and honourable posts in his
army and government, Aurangzeb showered his favours
only upon Muslims of low and obscure origin. He
made them jnmisabdars or Amirs, and gave them grants
of land and handsome incomes. In return they were
bound, in feudal fashion, to supply the Emperor with
soldiers in time of war : otherwise they were free to do
their own pleasure. With no restraining power to hold
them in check, they exacted money from their hapless
tenants, whom they cruelly oppressed. The peasants
and labouring classes lived in constant fear. They
buried their money ; wore scanty clothing ; and lived in
mean dvvelhngs so as not to excite the greed of the
Amir who ruled them. And thus it was that while the
Ch. IX.] THE LATER MUHAMMAD AN PERIOD. 1 23
Emperor piously dispensed strict justice at Delhi, cor-
ruption and misery prevailed in the land. The empire
had not fixed its roots in the hearts of the people. It
could have no stability, and it had none. By an iron
will Aurangzeb, the most powerful of all the Mughals,
had ruled over more extensive possessions and com-
manded larger armies than Akbar ; but when he died,
the empire, which had already in his old age begun to
slip from his hands, passed to a line of degenerate suc-
cessors who had not that genius which alone could save
it from ruin.
The death of Aurangzeb was as usual the signal for
rivals to contend for the vacant throne.
Muazzam brushed aside his younger J"^®. Emperors
brothers and had himself crowned as Bahadur Shah^
Bahadur Shah. But he had entered
upon a thorny way. He had to deal with the Marathas,
who were still warring in the Deccan. But they were
not now united, for a rivalry had sprung up among them
for the chief Command. One of the claimants to that
distinction, Sahu, son of Sambhaji, was a captive of the
Mughals. Bahadur Shah restored him to liberty on the
condition that he would not disturb the peace of Delhi ;
and the Marathas in fighting out their own differences
ceased to be a danger to the empire. Bahadur Shah
next pacified the Rajputs, and for the time being checked
the Sikhs who, to avenge the murder of Guru Govinda
Singh at the Mughal court, now raided the Punjab as
far as Lahore and Delhi. He was succeeded by jahan-
dar, Farukhsiyar, and Muhammad Shah (1719-1748).
But they were mere tools in the hands of two nobles,
the Sayyid brothers, Abdulla and Husain Ali, who
played the part of King-Makers. Meanwhile the empire
was crumbling to pieces.
Of the provinces that had been taken by the Mu-
ghals, the Deccan and Oudh were the
first to free themselves of the Delhi Jf the Mughal
court. From 1720- 1748, the Deccan Empire,
124 HISTORY OF INDIA.
was ruled over by the Nizam-ul-Mulk, while the
governor of Oudh made himself master of Oudh
(1732-1743). The Sikhs had already tried to throw off
the yoke (1710-1716), but had failed. However, Raj-
putana and Jodhpur became free by 1750. Sahu, the
grandson of Sivaji, strengthened himself in the fort of
Satara, and wrung chaut and sirdesmukhi from the
Deccan, Gujarat, Malwa (1743), and Orissa (1751), and
tribute from Bengal (1751).
The Mughal Empire which had been much weak-
ened by these losses, now received a
Nadtr^Shah death-blow from enemies that came from
other lands. The first of these was
Nadir Shah of Persia. He made up his mind to enrich
himself by robbing the Mughals at Delhi. Getting his
soldiers together, he marched through the mountain
passes into the Punjab without meeting with any oppo-
sition till he reached Kurnal, when he defeated the
Mughal troops (1738), and obtained the surrender of
Muhammad Shah. He made this Emperor, a grandson
of Bahadur Shah, join him and march with him to Delhi.
Its citizens created a riot and killed some of the Persian
troopers. Nadir thereupon let his soldiers massacre
the inhabitants of Delhi, and the Emperor's money and
jewels, the glorious peacock throne, the wealth of the
nobles, and the goods of the common people were
plundered. Nadir had now gained his object, and, that
being so, he was willing to return with the booty he had
taken. But before leaving India he made a show ot
being very kind to Muhammad. He made a treaty
with him, and put him on the throne of Delhi. He told
the nobles that he would avenge any disloyalty to the
Emperor whom he had set up. But he really wanted
the Koh-i-Nur, a great diamond which Muhammad wore
on his head ; and so he ended the farce of enthroning
the unhappy Mughal by exchanging turbans with him.
He then returned to Persia. *^
After a few years the Marathas revolted under
Ch. IX.] THE LATER MUHAMMADAN PERIOD. 1 25
Baji Rao. On his death, his work was
carried on by his son, Balaji. The latter St chaut.
took chaut from Bengal, and won Malwa
(1743) and Orissa (1751) from the Mughals. In 1747
Ahmad Shah Abdali, who ruled after Nadir Shah at
Kandahar, made his first inroad into India, but was
beaten off. In 1751 he again invaded
Hindustan, and took the Punjab from Invasions of
his namesake, the Emperor Ahmad Shah. ^gjg? ^^^^
The Rohillas rose against the latter and
defeated his forces. Then he was dethroned (1754), and
Alamgir II was crowned in his stead. In 1757 Delhi
was again sacked by Ahmad Shah, and now, in 1759,
Alamgir II was murdered by his wazir, Ghaziuddin. In
his fourth invasion (1759J Ahmad Shah
Abdali carried off whatever wealth Nadir Closing yeaps
Shah had left. After which he returned Emjip^e
home, having shattered the Mughal Em-
pire. The Marathas meanwhile had conquered a portion
of Northern India, and had taken Delhi. Ahmad Shah
Abdah, however, led a large army of forty-thousand
Afghans against them. The two armies met at Panipat
(1761), and the third battle of that name was fought.
The Maratha Confederacy was signally defeated. Ahmad
Shah Abdah then returned to Afghanistan, leaving
Ghaziuddin to rule for him at Delhi, and the true heir to
the Mughal throne, Shah Alam II, was sent into exile.
Meanwhile the British, under CHve, had gained power
in the land. In 1765 Shah Alam II had granted the East
India Company the Diwini of Bengal and Bihar, and had
placed himself under British protection. Till 1 771 he
lived at AUahadad as their pensioner. He then allied him-
self with the Marathas, who restored to him part of his
kingdom. But they really kept him prisoner at Delhi
till Lord Lake broke their power in the Second Maratha
War, and set the captive emperor at liberty. He was
given a pension which was continued to his son Akbar
II and to his grandson Muhammad Bahadur Shah. Akbar
126 HISTORY OF INDIA.
II reigned only in name from 1806 to 1837. His successor,
Muhammad Bahadur Shah, the last of Timur's line,
joined the rebels in the Sepoy Mutiny ("1857), and
was exiled to Rangoon, where he died in 1862, Thus
ends the history of the once glorious Empire of Delhi.
Section II.
The Rise and the Fall of the Marathas.
WHILE Shah Jahan reigned at Delhi, the Marathas
were growing into power. In chapter VI they
have been referred to under their original
name Rathiyas. They lived in the table- Marathas.
lands of the Deccan, and on the moun-
tains and plains of the Konkan. But their dominions
expanded until they included Orissa, Malwa, Nagpur,
Kandesh, the Berars, the Nizam's Dominions, and the
Konkan from Goa to the Gulf of Cambay. They had been
subdued by the early Muhammadan invaders of India,
and from the reign of Akbar to that of Aurangzeb part
of Maharashtra was subject to the Mughal Empire,
while the rest of it was ruled over by the Muhammadan
kings of Ahmadnagar and Bijapur. They became power-
ful under Shaji Bhonsla, a daring chief who owned forts
at Poona and Junir. In 1634 he aided Ahmadnagar and
Bijapur against the Mughals. His son, Sivaji, succeeded
him ; and by his talents as a soldier, he made the Mughals
respect the Marathas.
Sivaji was born in 1627. From his very boyhood he
joined in plunder and bloodshed. At the Sivaii
age of sixteen he was already the leader
of a band of robbers, and had set himself to repair his
father's mountain forts. From these he used to attack the
dwellers of the plains, plunder them, or take chant and
tribute, and then return to his mountain fastnesses. The
Sultan of Bijapur at last sent a powerful army under Afzal
Khan against him. Sivaji pretended to be humbled. He
begged for pardon, and promised to become an ally. He
asked ^r a friendly meeting with Afzal Khan, so that
he might make peace with him. The General fixed the
128
HISTORY OF INDIA.
time and place of meeting. Sivaji came to the spot at
the right time. He
assumed penitence :
but while speaking
to him, he sudden-
ly killed Afzal Khan
with a weapon
which he had hid-
den in his clothes.
Without delay the
Marathas fell on
the soldiers of
Bij apur, and,
having no leader,
they were beaten.
In 1 664 Sivaji sack-
ed Surat. Two
years later he made
himself Raja, and
began to coin
money. But the
tide of war turned
against him ; he
lost several of his
fortresses, and was
glad to come to
terms with Aurang-
zeb. He went to Delhi to pay homage to the Emperor
who had made him Viceroy of the Deccan. But when
he got there, he found that he was really a prisoner.
He, however, contrived to escape, and raised a revolt in
the Deccan. After giving much trouble to the Mughals
he went back to his capital at Rajgarh. Here he
enthroned himself with great pomp. He weighed
himself against gold, and divided the precious metal
among the Brahmans of his court. The English sent
him costly gifts from Bombay, and, when he raided the
Kamatic in 1675, the French paid him a large sum of
Sivaji's Fort at Rajgarh.
Sec. II.] THE MARATHAS. 1 29
money to be left in peace. The last years of his reign
were spent in fighting for, or against, the Mughals accord-
ing as it suited him. He died in 1680, and was succeed-
ed by his son, Sambhaji, (1680-1689), who was a weak
prince, and altogether unfit to rule. He was often
at war with the Portuguese and the Mughals. At last
he fell into the hands of Aurangzeb, who .
put him to death. His son, Sahu, a child lahu,
of six years, was kept captive till the death
of Aurangzeb. He was then set free on promising not
to take up arms against the Emperor (1707). He was
crowned at Satara. But a childhood spent in the royal
harem at Delhi, had taken away from him all manliness
and love of power. Although he was Raja in name, all
real power was in the hands of his Brahman minister,
Balaji Vishwanath, who was called Peshwa. So power-
ful did the Peshwa become, that in the reigns of the heirs
of Sahu, the Peshwa's power passed from father to son.
Sahu's generals gained much territory, but he himself
went mad, and the Peshwa thenceforth appropriated the
kingly functions. Finally, when Sahu died in 1748, his
son was thrown into prison by the Peshwa, who moved
the capital from Satara to Poona, and himself reigned
there.
Balaji Bishwanath, 1712-1721, was an exceedingly
able man. It will be remembered that
the six successors of Aurangzeb were The first Pesh-
mere toys in the hands of two power- y&hwaliath.
ful nobles, and were set upon the throne, 1712-1721,
or removed from it as these pleased.
Thus when Balaji Vishwanath took up the government
for Sahu, Sayyid Husain Ali and Sayyid Abdullah were
playing the part of "King-Makers" with respect to the
Mughal Empire of Delhi ; and when they promoted
Muhammad Shah to the throne in 171 9, they were
opposed by a combination of other nobles. To Balaji
Vishwanath this seemed a favourable opportunity to
130 HISTORY OF INDIA.
push forward Maratha interests, and he accordingly
led an army to Delhi in support of Say y id Husain.
In return, he received, in 1720, the right to chatit from
the Deccan, and control of the districts from Poona to
Satara.
Baji Rao 1., 1721-1740, succeeded his father and
acquired for himself the distinction of
The Second being the greatest of all the Peshwas. He
Rao 1 1721 to entered upon a war against the Emperor
1740. Muhammad Shah, and wrested from
him all Malwa and the tract of country
between the Narbada and the Chambal. He overthrew
the Nizam-ul-Mulk who came from the Deccan to the
assistance of the Emperor, and made him pay a penalty
of fifty lakhs of rupees. He then raised his hand against
the Portuguese on the west coast, and took Bassein from
them. His next effort was in the direction of winning
the Deccan ; but its Nizam at Haidarabad was more
than a match for him, and he was obliged to come to
terms with him.
Balaji Baji Rao, 1740-1761, occupied his years of
office with three wars — two against Salabat Jang, the
THE HOUSE OF THE PESHWAS,
Balaji Vishwanath, ist Peshwa.
I
Baji Rao I,, 2nd Peshwa.
Balaji Baji Rao, 3rcl Peshwa. Raghoba,
II I ..
Viswas Rao Madhu Rao, Narayan Rao, Baji Rao II.,
(Slain at Panipat). 4th Peshwa. 5th Peshwa, 7th Peshwa,
I I
Madhu Rao Narayan, "Nana Sahib
6th Peshwa. (Adopted Son).
Sec. II.] THE MARATHAS. 13!
Nizam of Haidarabad, and the third
against the Afghan invader, Ahmad ^^^^ "^B^j^^Ba^l
Shah Abdah. In the first of these wars Rao. 1740 to 1761.
the Nizam, with the help of French
troops under Bussy, defeated the Marathas ; but in the
end the Nizam had to cede much territory to the
Peshwa. Eight years later Salabat Jang attempted to
take Ahmadnagar from the Marathas ; but his expedi-
tion failed, and he suffered a severe defeat at Udgir, and
lost to the enemy all the north-western portion of his
kingdom. Meanwhile the Peshwa's brother, Raghoba,
invaded the Punjab (1758) which the Afghan king,
Ahmad Shah Abdali, had recently wrested from the
Mughal emperor. The several Maratha chiefs, who had
combined, as will be presently detailed, into a powerful
confederacy with the Peshwa as its head, stood by
Raghoba. The anger of Ahmad Shah Abdali was
roused, and he came with a powerful army to punish the
insolence of the Marathas. The Peshwa was down in
the South fighting with the Nizam, and so Ahmad Shah
had no difficulty in defeating the combined forces of
Sindhia and Holkar m the Third Battle of Panipat, 1761.
But the Maratha chiefs made another and more
determined effort to withstand the invader, and secured
the assistance of 200,000 Pindaris. It was, however, of
no avail. They experienced a still more signal defeat,
and their prospects of becoming the paramount power
in India were considerably diminished.
In the preceding paragraph mention has been
made of a confederacy of Maratha chiefs. They were :
1. The Peshwa, whose capital was at Poona. He
made himself supreme in Satara and Kolhapur
where the descendants of Sivaji
held nominal sway. The Treaty confeSey.^
of Bassein in 1802, and the annexa-
tion of Satara by Lord Dalhousie in 1848, put
9ii end to the House of the Peshwas.
2. Sindhia, Raja of Gwaliar.
132 HISTORY OF INDIA.
3. Holkar, Raja of Indore, and a rival of Sindhia.
4. Bhonsla, Raja of Berar, the Karnatic and Orissa.
His capital was at Nagpur in the Central Provinces.
His kingdom was annexed by Lord Dalhousie in
1853.
5. Damaji Gaekwar, Raja of Baroda.
A short account may here be given of how these chiefs
came into existence. It has been seen that the Peshwa
Balaji Vishwanath supplanted the House of Sivaji. By
the time Balaji Baji Rao ruled at Poona four viceroys
had been appointed to collect the revenues of Berar,
Gujarat and Malwa. But the temptation to rule in their
own rights was too strong, and eventually Sindhia and
Holkar, dividing Malwa between them, became in-
dependent rulers at Gwahor and Indore. Similarly
Bhonsla and Damaji Gaekwar set themselves upon the
thrones of Berar and Gujarat. While professing allegi-
ance to the Peshwa, they practically neglected to take
him into account, and framed their own laws and entered
upon hostilities with one another or their neighbours.
Had these chieftains held together, they would have
formed a powerful combination. But, unfortunately for
the Maratha cause, they were jealous of one another,
and often questioned even the supremacy of the
Peshwa. A house divided against itself cannot stand,
and the quarrels which the Maratha chiefs had among
themselves ruined the national prospects.
Madhu Rao 1761-1772 became Peshwa when
he was only seventeen years of age.
PeshwaTMadhu During his minority his uncle, Raghoba,
Rao, 1761 to 1772, acted as his guardian. The greater
part of his rule was taken up with suc-
cessful wars against the Nizam of Haidarabad, the
Bhonslas of Berar, and Haidar Ali, the Sultan of Mysore.
During his time a very remarkable woman, Ahalya
Bai of the family of Holkar, ruled at Indoive. For
her commander-in-chief she had a talented soldier,
Sec. II.] THE MAKATHAS. I33
Tukaji Holkar, whom she adopted as
her son. She was alto^i^ether a model ^uouKfSL- „„h
J , • J T 1 J. Analya Bai ana
queen, and she raised indore to a posi- Tukaji Holkar-
tion of honour among the Maratha States.
She died in 1795, and is even now worshipped in
Malwa as an incarnation of the Deity.
Narayan Rao, 1772-1773, the younger brother
of Madhu Rao, succeeded him. He
was, however, murdered at the instance T^^ ^Nap^^an"
of Ananda Bai, the ambitious wife of Rao. 1772-1773.
Raghoba, who desired to see her hus-
band installed as Peshwa. No sooner had Raghoba pro-
claimed himself as such, than Nana Farnavis, one of the
chief ministers at Poona, produced Madhu Rao Narayan,
a posthumous son of Narayan Rao, and claimed the
Peshwaship for him in 1774. There was immediately a
division in the Maratha camp. Some of
the chiefs disliked Raghoba and sup- Contact with
ported the infant heir, while others of fn tlfe^FiiS
them refused to believe that the child Maratha War.
was really Narayan Rao's son, and pre-
pared to support Raghoba, To settle the dispute, an
appeal was made to arms, and civil war began — the First
Maratha War. An account of the conflict will be given
when we come to the administration of Warren Hastings.
Suffice it here to say that at its conclusion, Madhu Rao
Narayan was created Peshwa, and Raghoba was given
a handsome pension.
Madhu Rao Narayan, 1773-1795. Meanwhile the
Maratha army, chiefly under the leader- -pj^g sixth Pesh-
ship of Sindhia, had overrun Northern wa, Madhu Rao
India, captured Delhi, and obtained pos- J^^^^^^"- ^'^'^S-
session of the person of Shah Alam II.,
the Mughal Emperor, After this, Sindhia made him-
self independent of the Peshwa. He, however, died in
1794, and Nana Farnavis was left without a rival. This
134 HISTORY OF INDIA.
enabled him to turn his attention to the Nizam of
Haidarabad, who had allowed his tribute to fall into
arrears — the tribute he had arranged to pay after the
the battle of Udgir. Nana Farnavis summoned the
Maratha chiefs to assist him against the Nizam, and
they loyally responded. The contending armies met at
Kurdla, and the Nizam was entirely defeated. Madhu
Rao Narayan did not long enjoy the watchful care of
Nana Farnavis; for, giving vent to a fit of ungoverned
anger because his whims were thwarted, he killed himself.
Baji Rao II, the son of Raghoba, now became
Peshwa, 1795. The jealousies of the
The Seventh Maratha chiefs continued, and the
fr®^?-^r'^^4'J!5° tendency now was to question the
IL, 1795, and the ■' m d i \ j
Second Maratha supremacy of the Peshwa. And so it was
War. that Jeswant RaoHolkar, son ofTukaji
Holkar, took up arms against both
Sindhia and the Peshwa. In distress the latter appealed
to the English for help, which was afforded him on his
signing the Treaty of Bassein, 1802. The result was that
the English were drawn into the Second Maratha War
in which they fought against Daulat Rao Sindhia and
Raghuji Bhonsla. The story of this war will be fully
related when we come to deal with the adminstration of
the Marquis of Wellesley. It is sufficient here to say that
the Maratha chiefs \vere defeated, and that the third
Maratha War completely wrecked their Confederacy.
But in the Maratha Confederacy itself, there were
internal causes which would eventually have wrought
its ruin. Among these may be mentioned the action of
Sindhia in making himself independent of the Peshwa,
and indeed his rival. Another cause was
Causes of the the struggle between Raghoba and Nana
S°aratha°Con! Farnavis as to who should succeed
federaey. Narayan Rao as Peshwa. A third cause
was the civil war of Baji *Rao II,
with Jeswant Rao Holkar and Daulat Rao Sindhia.
Sec. II. THE MARATHAS.
135
A fourth cause lay in the circumstance that while the
Peshwas were Brahmans, some members of the Confed-
eracy were of lower caste. Finally, in the eyes of all
India, he was paramount who had the Mughal Emperor
for his prisoner. In 1795 the Marathas had had possession
of his person ; but in the course of the Second Maratha
War, 1803, Shah Alam II, fell into the hands of the
English, and then it was that the last semblance of
power deserted the Marathas.
Before closing this chapter, some account must be
given of the Maratha army and of the system of
Maratha war, administration and revenue, which
though devised by Sivaji was retained, with minor
adaptations, by the Peshwas and by the several states
that made up the Maratha Confederacy.
The foundation of Sivaji's power was his infantry
which numbered 50,000 men. They
brought their own arms— a sword, a P® Maratha
shield and a match-lock. Every tenth '"^'
man carried a bow and arrows for night attack and
surprises. Their only equipage was a single blanket
and a small bag of parched grain. They mounted
precipices, or scaled rocks which would defy others.
They received from Rs. 3 to Rs. 10 a month. Above a
series of subordinate officers there were captains of
5000, who served under the commander-in-chief of
infantry.
The cavalry, presided over by its own commander-
in-chief, was divided into three classes : — Bargis, whose
horses were supplied by the State ; Silidars, who pro-
vided their own horses ; and Pagahs, who were the
chief's household troops. Their principal weapon was
the spear. Camp equipage was unknown. At their
saddles they carried a small bag for food and plunder.
They were as hardy as their ponies, and often swept the
country at the rate of from 50 to 80 miles in twenty-
four hour% The chiefs and officers equally shared in
the privations of their men. The latter were paid
136 HISTORY OF INDIA.
between Rs 7 and Rs 40 a month, and at the end of the
year all accounts were made up, and payments due to
soldiers were never allowed to fall into arrears. During
the rains the cavalry retired to the fortresses where com
and grass were stored by retainers, who enjoyed perma-
nent assignments of rent-free land, which, together with
the care of the forts, descended from father to son.
The foot soldiers also went to their homes to cultivate
their fields. While infantry and cavalry were thus resting
from warfare, Sivaji prepared his plans for the operations
of the coming year. At the Dussera festival the national
flag was unfurled, and from all sides the soldiery once
more swarmed to their chief. The Peshwa's forces
mustered 60,000 all told. The contingents from the
other states of the Confederacy augmented these numbers
by an additional 50,000. But the Peshwa's army was
called together only when he himself took the field.
On his return to Poona, his troops were disbanded.
The heights of the Western Ghats were crowned
with numerous fortresses which could
li^win^ ^^^^^^ be reached only by a narrow flight of
01 wd,r. 1 /- 1 •
steps, and from where an unseen garri-
son could hurl down massive stones upon the enemy.
Here the Maratha troops found safety when pressed by
the foe. They made it a rule to avoid pitched battles.
The infantry usually hovered on the skirts of an army or
hung about a camp, and as opportunity offered they
carried off provisions and treasure. While the foot-
soldiers were thus tormenting the enemy, the light-horse,
(some 7000 in strength in the days of Sivaji), scoured
the plains, harrying and plundering peaceful villages in
alien territory. At the first warning of an approaching
army they galloped back to their fortresses in the hills
and jungles. Or they assembled on particular points
with secrecy, and having made a rapid foraj^ they
dispersed, again to form a fresh combination and deliver
an unexpected attack. Their movements weife so rapid
that it was impossible for any force of regular cavalry
Sec. II.] THE MARATHAS. 1 37
to overtake or intercept them. When they could not
avoid giving open battle, their common plan was to
feign a retreat, and having by this artifice lured the
enemy into an ambuscade, they completed their destruc-
tion. Or while the foe was eagerly pursuing them, they
suddenly turned and routed them before they could
recover from their confusion. As Sivaji's cavalry and
infantry were recruited from his own peasants, they
were always available for a campaign, provided it was
not seed-time or harvest. Thus Sivaji had command of
a large body of fighting men, without being put to the
expense of keeping a standing army. With them he
swooped down upon his prey ; and exacted tribute, or
extorted a heavy price for peace. From part of the
plunder he paid off his followers, and keeping the lion's
share for himself, he returned to his hill-fort. This
system of warfare was peculiarly suited to the instincts
of the Marathas and to the character of their country.
By giving every soldier of whatever rank a personal
interest in success, Sivaji cemented princes and people
into a great brotherhood, which was not dissolved when,
in later years, the chiefs of the Maratha Confederacy
had no king over them, and when they were fighting
with one another, or even with the Peshwa.
The administrative unit of Sivaji was the fortress
with its surrounding tract of country.
The forts gave him a local foot-hold, of^^AdSimstra^
and a place wherein to deposit his tion.
plunder. On the plains the village
system prevailed, and the majority of cultivators were
hereditary occupants, who could not be dispossessed so
long as they paid their revenues. Each village was
under a Fatal, who supervised the cultivation of fields,
managed the police, collected the revenue, and arranged
for the protection of his charge. Several Palais were
grouped together and put in subordination to Deshadhi-
karis or Deshpandias, whose office was hereditary.
While Ihese officers held control over the Patals, they
n8 HISTORY OF. INDIA.
^
could not interfere with the general management of the
country. Small districts were presided over by Taliik-
dars. Subahdars held jurisdiction over bazar areas which
contained one or more forts in which they deposited
the grain and money, which their subordinates collected.
To secure the ryots against unfair exactions, all village
lands were divided into fields which were accurately
entered into a register.
To assist in the proper conduct of public affairs,
Sivaji appointed various grades of officers ; and later on
his gradation was, with a few necessary modifications,
adopted by each of the chiefs of the Maratha Con-
federacy. The following were the more important servants
of the government : -
(i) The Peshwa, or Prime minister.
(2) The Mazhndar, or Auditor-General of Accounts
and Superintendent of Finance.
(3) The Commander-in-Chief of Cavalry.
(4) The Commander-in-Chief of Infantry.
(5) The Niadesh, or President of the Judiciary.
Civil suits were tried by a Panchayat, or\oc?i\]Mxy.
Disputes between soldiers were settled by their officers.
The criminal laws were derived from the Shastras, and
were administered by Mayisabdars and Siirsubahdars.
The Raja or Chief was the final head of military and
civil affairs.
The Revenue of the Marathas was derived from
alien territory in the shape of money
of^Revenue^^^"^ exactions of tribute, and from the home-
land in the shape of (i) land revenue
(2) customs on imports and exports ; (3) miscellaneous,
e.g., offerings of pilgrims, taxes on houses and pasturage,
fines, etc.
Of Maratha land the assessment of revenue was
yearly calculated upon the actual condition of the crops.
There was no permanent assessment, but annually the
state took the money value of two-fifths of the har-
vests. Sivaji set his face against jagir lands, and
Sec. II.] THE MARATHAS. 139
against the farming out of revenues to collectors. From
non-Maratha countries chant, i.e., one-fourth of their
gross revenues, was 3'early exacted as the price of their
being left unmolested. The income thus derived went
into the general funds of the state. But over and above
this, sttrdeshmukhi, i.e., ten per cent, of the gross
revenues was levied (particularly on the six subhas of
the Deccan) and was assigned to the Raja himself. Plunder
was the sole object of all military expeditions, and it
was brought at stated periods to Sivaji's Durbar, where
the men who had taken it were praised, rewarded or
promoted. From it payments were made to those in
the service of the government. But under the Peshwas,
all military and civil servants were paid by permanent
assignments on portions of the revenue of villages.
With this modification the chiefs of the Maratha Con-
federacy, as also the Peshwa, adopted the system of
revenue collection and distribution which Sivaji had
established ; and indeed, no better means could have
been devised for holding together those upon whose
combination and federation the integrity of the Maratha
rule depended.
»
Section III.
The Sikhs.
THE Sikhs were a sect of Jats whose early home was
in the valley of the Indus. They trace their origin
to Nanak, a celebrated Hindu reformer,
the Sikhs^ °^ who was born in Lahore in 1469. They
gradually spread over the Punjab and
Rajputana, and pushed their colonies as far south as the
Jumna. They still inhabit these parts.
In all, they had ten Gurus, or temporal and spirit-
ual leaders — Nanak being the first, and Govind Singh
g G ■ d ^^^ ^^^^' ^^"^^ formulated the Sikh
Faith, a refined type of Hinduism which
was finally written into a book called the GraJith.
Govind Singh was leader of the Sikhs from 1676 to 1708,
durmg which time, by abolishing the distinction of caste,
he welded them into a united body. He also gave
them a military character, and established a Sikh
common-wealth under the name of the Khalsa.
The growing importance of the Sikhs alarmed the
Emperor Aurangzcb, who, to satisfy him-
Theip Perseeu- self of their attitude towards him, sum-
Mug-half ^ moned Govind Singh to attend his court.
After some hesitation the guru set out
in obedience to the call, but in the meantime Aurangzeb
died, and he presented himself before his successor,
Bahadur Shah. He was received with much distinction ;
but was suddenly assassinated by a Pathan. This act
of treachery exasperated the Sikhs, and they determined
to avenge their leader's death. By capturing Sirhind,
and ravaging the country up to Lahore, they brought
Bahadur Shah into the field against them. But after six
years of fighting they scattered, and took refuge in the
hills and jungles. This period of depression, however,
Sec. III.] THE SIKHS. 141
was not without its advantages, for during it they per-
fected a mihtary system by organising themselves into
Confederacies, or Missils, each under its
own Sardar. Theoretically anyone could The Missils.
win his way to a sardarship ; but in
course of time the office became hereditary. And so
what had originally been a brotherhood of co-ordinate
Missils, became a military aristocracy, in which all influ-
ence and power continued in the hands of a few chiefs,
until Ranjit Singh, in 1800, brushed aside his rival sardars
and established a monarchy in which he was the sole
ruler.
It has been related above that for a number of years
the Sikhs found refuge in retirement ;
but when Nadir Shah was returning Their struggle
home from the sack of Delhi, in 1738, shlh Abdafif
they emerged from their obscurity, fell
on the rear of his army, and carried off much plunder
with which they replenished their empty coffers. When
the subsequent invasions of the same Shah, had to a large
extent undermined the Mughal Empire, they gathered
from all quarters at Amritsar, and became aggressive
toward their no longer prosperous enemy. The Mughal
viceroy of Lahore, therefore proclaimed a general
massacre of the Sikhs, and thousands of them were put
to death. The Mughals, however, had to stay their
arm, for between the years 1748 and 1756, Ahmad Shah
Abdali made a series of incursions which designed the
final overthrow of the Empire of Delhi. The Sikhs
made no distinction between Afghan and Mughal, and
defeating Ahmad Shah's troops at Lahore (1758) they
declared the Khalsa an independent state. Taking
advantage of Ahmad Shah's withdrawal to his own
kingdom, the Mughals, assisted by the Marathas, tried
to recover the Punjab. Ahmad Shah immediately re-
turned to Drevent this, and inflicted a severe defeat on
the Marathas, in the Third Battle of Panipat, 1761.
Finding that the Afghans and Mughals were bent on
142 HISTORY OF INDIA.
each other's destruction, the Sikhs became more daring.
They occupied Sirhind and other fortresses belonging to
the Afghans : but Ahmad Shah soon rescued Sirliind
from them and destroyed Amritsar, their Holy City.
They however rallied ; regained man)^ of the strong-
holds that had been wrested from them ; and took pos-
session of the tract of country between the Jumna and
the Sutlej. This brought Ahmad Shah once more into
India. But the Sikhs having found that they were no
match for Afghan armies in an open field, were now
careful not to allow themselves to be drawn into battle.
Ahmad himself was tired of an ineffective warfare.
Besides this, news reached him of disturbances in
Kabul, and he diplomatically acknowledged the Sikh
Chief of Patiala as his local Governor. But no sooner
had he departed to Kabul, than the Sikhs captured
Lahore, seized all the country between the Sutlej
and the Jhelum, and proclaimed the Khalsa to be the
Dominant Power in the Punjab. They now ruled
from the Jumna to the Jhelum. In the face of these
events Ahmad Shah determined in 1767 to make a final
attempt to crush the irrepressible Sikhs. He succeeded
in checking the Khalsa army on the banks of the Sutlej ;
but failing health compelled him to adopt a policy of
conciliation, and he set up the Chief of Patiala as the
ruler of Sirhind. But the Sikhs were not deceived. In
this apparent kindness they saw a proof that the Punjab
was slipping out of Afghan hands, and no sooner had
Ahmad Shah crossed the Indus, they took posses-
sion of Lahore and Rhotas. Although from this time
they suffered no more persecution and were accounted
one of the great powers in the land, they could not yet
put off their armour. For when Ahmad Shah died in
1773, his son and successor, Timur Shah, drove them
from Multan ; and when twenty years later Shah Zaman
was king of Kabul, he recovered Lahore from them. He
might have had larger successes, but the turbulence of his
own subjects in Afghanistan compelled him, in 1798, to be
Sec. III.] THE SIKHS. 143
content to receive merely the homage of the Sikh sardars,
and to appoint Ranjit Singh, as governor of Lahore.
Ranjit Sing-h, the national hero of the Sikhs, was
born in 1780. While he was still a child p ... „. .
he lost an eye from small-pox. On the **^"^^^ ''^"^^•
death of his father in 1792 he succeeded to the sardar-
ship of his Missil, but was under guardians till he was
seventeen years old. He had been ruling in his own right
only one year, when, as has been related. Shah Zaman made
him Governor of Lahore. He soon proved that he was a
born leader of men, and steadily grew in influence and
popularity. This excited the envy of rival sardars, and a
coalition was formed against him. In 1800 he brushed
aside his enemies, and assuming the title of Maharajah,
began to mint money in his own name. But a one-man-
rule was contrary to the traditions of the Sikhs, and the
sardars of the Cis-Sutlej States of Patiala, Jhind, and
Nabha protested against the usurpation of the kingly rank
by Ranjit Singh. In 1 806, he crossed the Sutlej with the
intention of compelling the refractory chiefs to acknow-
ledge him as their king. They appealed to the English
for. protection, on the plea that inasmuch as the Mara-
thas under Holkar had receded from their possessions
in Northern India, on the termination of the Second
Maratha War, in 1803, the parts of the country inhabited
by them was under British influence. Lord Minto, who
was Governor-General, accordingly sent an envoy to La-
hore, with the result, that Ranjit Singh let the Cis-Sutlej
Sikh chiefs alone, and undertook to regard the river as
the eastern boundary of his kingdom.
Ranjit Singh's reign was one protracted campaign
for the consolidation of his power. His ambition there-
fore was to maintain a well trained army. In order to
improve the efficiency of his troops he appointed Euro-
pean officers to command them. Through the services
of his_ soldiery he converted the Afghan Governor of
Pesha^'ar into a vassal, and by 1831 he had brought
into subjection the Muhammadan provinces of Multan,
144 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Kashmir, the Rajputana hill states, and a number of
minor independent chiefs. He now ruled over territories
extending from the hills beyond the Indus to Ladak in
Tibet, and from the northern banks of the Sutlej to
Kashmir. On three sides his possessions touched those
of the English. With the latter he found it prudent to
live on good terms, so much so, that he joined them when
it was found expedient to eject Dost Muhammad of Af-
ghanistan, and restore their lost kingdom to the Duranis.
But while the war was in progress he died in 1839.
On the death of Ranjit Singh, many princes in quick
succession filled his throne, but met
with violent deaths. The army of the SXeKTalJa
Khalsa usurped all power, and did as Army,
its leaders pleased. At last, in 1843,
Ranjit Singh's youngest son, Dhulip Singh, a boy of ten,
was given the crown with his mother as Queen-Regent,
and with the chief sardars as his Council of State or
Khalsa.
But the palmy days of the Sikhs were now a thing
of the past. It is true that they had triumphed over
Moslem and Maratha, and had founded a mighty kingdom
in the Punjab. But about this time they came into
conflict with the English, and their great bravery was
of no avail against the superior discipline and equipments
of British troops. As will be seen, later on, they were
defeated in the First and Second Sikh Wars, and their
kingdom was finally absorbed into the British Empire.
CHAPTER XI.
The Early Period of the Company :
Section I.
The First European Settlers.
J4g8 — lySs A.D.
IN some of the preceding chapters, mention has been
made of certain European nations, from which it
will have been inferred that they were already in the
country. It is now time to relate when and why they
came.
In very early times, India was known to Europe.
The Romans traded with it, and the
fn Sty Siys^^^ Greeks, as we have seen, actually in-
vaded it. Alfred the Great of England
sent a nobleman of his court as an ambassador to one of
its princes. But Europe was so far from India, and
navigation was so full of danger, that it was no easy
matter for trade to be carried on between the two Be-
sides this, the nations of Europe were so occupied with
their own wars, and other affairs, that they did not have
the desire or the opportunity to trade. But when, at
the close of the fifteenth century, people had recovered
from the strain of constant warfare, a great wish filled
the minds of many in Western Europe to find a way to
India by sea.
In 1497, under the patronage of King John II of
Portugal, Vasco da Gama tried to reach
^^I ^^E^"^"®^® India by sailing round the Cape of Good
Hope. This he accomplished in 1498,
landing at Calicut. Here he was kindly received by the
Zamorin, or Hindu Raja, and returned to Portugal with
a rich car^o of spices and precious stones. Encouraged
by these results, the King of Portugal, in 1500, sent a
146 HISTORY OF INDIA.
large fleet on the same errand, under Pedro Alvares
Cabral. He effected a safe landing, and established a
factory or agency at Calicut, for the sale of Portuguese
wares and the purchase of Indian commodities. It
ought to be noticed that, at this time, the bulk of Indian
trade was in the hands of the Muhammadans, or Moplas,
as they were called. Naturally they resented the arrival
of the Portuguese, in whose favour part of the commerce
of the coast began to be diverted. They used their
influence with the Zamorin so successfully that, when
Vasco da Gama revisited India in 1502, this king quar-
relled with him. But Vasco da Gama made allies of the
Rajas of Cochin and Cannanore, and with their assistance
he defeated his former friend in battle. The King of
Portugal did not approve of what Vasco da Gama
had done, and recalled him from India, replacing him,
in 1505, by Francisco d' Almeida, under the name
and style of Governor and Viceroy of the Portuguese in
India. Almeida carried on a profitable trade for his
master ; and when he returned home, Alfonso d'
Albuquerque filled his place. The latter was a very
successful ruler, and having won Goa for Portugal in
1510, he died there five years latter (1515). After a
lapse of nine years Vasco da Gama was again sent out
to be Viceroy ; but he died at Cochin in the following
year (1525).
By this time the Portuguese owned many towns on
the coast from Diu in Gujarat to Quilon.
Possesions. ^^^^ chief of these were Bassein, Bombay,
Goa, Mangalore, Cannanore, Cranganore,
Calicut, and Cochin. Besides these, St. Thom6 and
Masulipatam, and Negapatam, all on the East Coast,
were theirs, as also was a large part of Ceylon. Their
chief port was Diu, and Goa was their capital. Not
satisfied with these possessions, they warred against
Gujarat and Malabar, and entered Sindh in 1556. But
they had no success. In 1560 an Archbishop was sent
to Goa, and from this time the Portuguese tried to
Ch. XL] EARLY EUROPEAN SETTLERS. I47
convert the people of the country to Christianity. They
were very cruel to those who would not accept this
religion, and so they began to be hated by both Hindus
and Muhammadans. This hatred was one of the causes
of their downfall in India. Another cause, was the
arrival of the Dutch and the English in 1600.
Like the English, the Dutch at first tried to reach
India by passing through Behring Straits.
But in this they failed. Cornelius Hout- i^dia
mann then, in 1596, attempted the south-
ern route ; but landed at Bantam in Java. From this place
he carried home a cargo of spices. He made another
expedition in 1599, and with the help of the natives he
took away from the Portuguese several of their towns
m the Molucca Islands. The Dutch had previously con-
quered a part of Ceylon, and became, by 1605, the
greatest maritime nation on Indian waters. But the
rivalry between them and the English in the Eastern
Seas led to much fighting, and they eventually massacred
the English at Amboyna in 1623. This act of cruelty
did not improve matters, and the two nations continued in
open hostility until 1689, the year in which WiUiam of
Orange became king of England. But long before this
date the power of the Dutch in the East had been
declining, chiefly through their greed and cruelty.
Their hopes of an Indian Empire were put an end to by
Clive, who, in 1758, took Chinsurah, their capital in
Bengal, away from them. At present the Dutch own
no lands in India.
The British, as has been said, visited India in very
early times. William of Malmsbury ^ ,. , ,^ .
records, that in 833 A.D. King Alfred f„"&VMTa'''
sent Sighelmus, Bishop of Sherburn,
to present gifts at the shrine of St. Thomas, near
Madras, and that he came back with spices and gems.
Then in 1496 John Cabot was sent to find a way to India ;
but he*discovered Newfoundland instead. When Queen
Mary came to the throne, she sent Sir Hugh Willoughby
148 HISTORY OF INDIA.
to see if he could get to India through Behring Straits.
But he and his crew perished in the Arctic Seas. Fro-
bisher, Davis, Hudson, and Baffin — all celebrated Eng-
lish navigators — attempted the same voyage, but they
met with no success. For a time people gave up the
idea of reaching India by crossing the seas. It seemed
easier to do so by land, through Persia. Accordingly in
1583, John Nevvbery, William Leeds, and Ralph Fitch
sailed to Syria by the Mediterranean Sea, and reached
Ormuz by way of the Persian Gulf, Aleppo and Bagdad.
Here they were thrown into prison ; but on being
liberated, they sailed to Goa, the chief town of the
Portuguese. At the last mentioned city they were cast
into prison ; but escaping, they travelled over a great
part of India. From Agra, Newbery went back to
England, via Persia, Leeds, became jeweller to Akbar.
Fitch visited Benares, Bhutan, Hugh, and Ceylon, and
finally reached home in 1591. The accounts which he
gave of all he had seen in India, of its wealth and plenty,
quickened anew pubhc interest in that country, and
without delay several ships, under the guidance of
Lancaster, were sent out round the Cape. Lancaster's
expedition was a failure ; but Queen Elizabeth, in 1599,
despatched John Mildenhall to the Emperor Akbar.
Nothing was gained by his visit. Not to be beaten by
these repeated failures, a Company — the great East India
Company — was formed under royal charter in 1600.
Lancaster again led a new fleet into Indian waters, and
this time his perseverance was rewarded, for he went
back with a rich cargo of calicoes and spices.
Gratified by this success, the Directors of the East
India Company sent out ships every year
The East India till 16 10. The Dutch were, at this time,
the^Duteh ^°^ ^^^ undisputed masters of the Eastern
Seas, and they resented the intrusion of
the English. They had already crushed the Portuguese,
and they now entered upon active hostilities agamst the
English. They met their ships at sea, and often captured
Ch. XI.] EARLY EUROPEAN SETTLERS. 149
them. King James I thought that it would be a great
gain to enter into an alliance with the Mughal Emperor.
And so, in 16 15, he sent Sir Thomas Roe as the English
ambassador to Jahangir. The latter received the embassy
kindly, but no practical good resulted. The ill-feeling
between the English and the Dutch continued to grow,
and culminated, as already stated, in the massacre of the
English by the Dutch at Amboyna in 1623.
But for all that the English Company went on
prospering. It had a factory at Gom-
broon, and another at Surat which be- fetUements
came their capital. On the Coromandal
Coast, factories had been estabhshed at Masulipatam,
Puhcat, Armagaon,Pipli, and Madras (1639). In 1656 an
English doctor cured the child of the Nawab of Bengal,
and the grateful prince made a gift of Hughli to the
Company. Then factories were set up at Patna and
Casimbazar. In 1662 Charles II married Catherine of
Braganza, and received Bombay as her dowry. In 1668
he transferred it to the East India Compan}' , who made
it their western capital. About this time the French
came to trade in India, and leaving the history of the
English for the present, let us turn to the new arrivals.
The fact that the Portuguese, the Dutch and the
English had established trade with India,
could not but arouse the ambition of the ^le'Sene^
French to do the same. And so it was
that in 1667 Louis XIV despatched an expedition under
Francis Caron to open up trade with India. Caron
touched at Cochin, and by the end of the same year, the
first French factory was established at Surat. He next
obtained permission from the King of Golconda for the
French to trade in that king's dominions, and to erect a
factory at Masulipatam. Not content with such gradual
progress, he conceived the idea of ousting the Dutch
from their possessions in Ceylon. He accordingly led
an expedition against them ; but his hopes of acquir-
ing a rpady-made business were disappointed. The
150 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Dutch defeated him at Point de Galle, and though
Trinkamali fell into his hands, he again lost it to his
enemies. When the war ended, the only gain from the
loss of much money and many lives, was the small and
unimportant town of St. Thome, near Madras. The
home Government considered that Caron had been a
failure, and he was replaced by Martin.
Martin's policy was to secure the prosperity of the
Martin French Company, by being on friendly
terms with all around him. The French
had come to trade, and trade depends upon peace. He
accordingly entered into negotiations with Sher Khan
Lodi of Bijapur in the Karnatic, and purchased from
him Puducheri (Pondichery), Villanur, and Bahur.
Pondichery was excellently situated and healthy.
While it was protected against the monsoon, it also
afforded a safe landing place, and was besides, a con-
venient point from which to traffic with the interior.
So it was made the capital of the Indian possessions of
France. Martin fortified it, and raised regiments of
native soldiers.
But trouble was at hand. In 1675, Sivaji the
powerful Maratha chief, made a raid into the Karnatic
for plunder. Sher Khan Lodi fled before him, and he
turned upon the French on the pretext that they were
the alhesofSher Khan. Martin, however, warded off
the danger which threatened by prudently acknowledg-
ing the supremacy of the Marathas, and by paying
Sivaji a sum of money for the retention of Pondichery,
and for permission to continue to trade in the Karnatic.
It must be noted that, during this period of history,
when any two nations went to war in Europe, it meant
that they had to fight against each other also in India.
About this time war broke out between the French and
the Dutch on the Continent, and so the hostilities ex-
tended to India. The Dutch had not forgotten how
Caron had attempted to expel them from Ceylon, and
were glad of an opportunity to pay off old" scores.
Ch. XL] EARLY EUROPEAN SETTLERS. 15I
They promptly landed at Pondichery, and took it. But
four years later the European war was brought to a
close by the Peace of Ryswick, and as one of the condi-
tions of the treaty was that Pondichery should be re-
stored to the French, it was given back to them.
Some years previous to this, 1688, the Emperor
Aurangzeb had given Chandarnagar, in Bengal, to the
Frencli ; and their affairs had so prospered that when
in 1 70 1 the title of Governor of Pondichery was con-
ferred on Martin, he ruled over tracts of land at
Masulipatam, Surat, Chandarnagar, Balasore, Dacca,
Patna, and Casimbazar. During his administration, which
continued till his death, in 1709, trade flourished, and
the French were courted by Indian princes. But when
Law succeeded Martin, things went badly with the
French Company, and its trade declined. A reaction,
however, set in in 1721 when Lenoir assumed the
government, and prosperity once more returned.
The next French Governor was Dumas. He resum-
ed the policy of Martin, and through
Dost Ali, the Nawab of the Karnatic, he Dumas,
obtained from Muhammad Shah, of
Delhi, permission to coin money. He lent his troops to
a claimant to the throne of Tanjore, and received in
return the town of Karikal and ten villages adjacent to
it. The Mughal Empire, it will be remembered, was
at this moment passing through a severe crisis, for Nadir
Shah had invaded India. As though this were not
enough, the Marathas, jealous of the Emperor's growing
influence in the south, raided the Karnatic, 1736, and
completely defeated Dost Ali. The near and distant
relatives of the Nawab, as also many minor chiefs of the
neighbourhood, flocked into Pondichery for protection
against the dreaded enemy. Protection was afforded
them by Dumas, who saw in this a means of extending
French patronage, and an opportunity of bringing into
his debt those who, later on, might be of signal service
to the Frepch. As was to be expected, the Marathas
152 HISTORY OF INDIA.
demanded that the refugees should be dehvered to them,
and when Dumas refused to comply, Raghuji Bhonsla
threatened to raze Pondichery to the dust. But Dumas
pacified him, and the Maratha chieftain was content to
return home with what booty he had gained. The
princes who had thus been delivered from the hand of
the Marathas, were naturally full of gratitude to the
French, and they repaid their protectors by making
them grants of land. Safdar Ali, son and heir to the
late Nawab of the Karnatic, added to the French pos-
sessions, and the Mughal Emperor conferred upon
Dumas the title of Nawab, and created him a Com-
mander of 4,500 Horse, both of which dignities were to
be transmitted to his successors. After a most distinguish-
ed career Dumas retired in 1741, and the celebrated
Dupleix became Director-General of the French Posses-
sions in 'India.
Section II.
Struggle Between the English and the French.
1741 — 1783 A.D.
DUPLEIX had hitherto been in charge at Chandar-
nagar. When he took up the reins of government,
the War of the Austrian Succession was
brewing in Europe, and neither England Duoleix. At-
nor France could spare either money ffs^^V'^F^e^eh
or forces for operations in far-off India. Empire.
Foreseeing what was hkely to happen
when war was declared at home, Dupleix at once began
to enter into alliances with the princes around him, and
to cut down the expenses of the French factories. The
most important of his new allies was Anwar-ud-din, the
Nawab of Arcot, and the landlord of the English. As
soon as the expected war — the War of the Austrian
Succession — broke out in Europe, the Enghsh attacked
Pondichery. Dupleix appealed to the
Nawab to forbid his tenants, the English, ^^^ Karnatie
to attack the Capital of his allies, the
French. The Nawab complied; but, his prohibition
notwithstanding, the English blockaded Pondichery,
and were on the point oUaking it, when La Bourdonnais
opportunely arrived with a French fleet. To draw their
foes away from Pondichery, the French made up their
minds to lay siege to Madras. It was now the turn of
the English to appeal to the Nawab to protect his
tenants. But he was not in sympathy with them ;
besides, he wanted the French to take the city, for
Dupleix had promised to give him the town as soon as
it was wrested from the English. So Madras fell into
the han<is of the French, and its garrison were made
prisoner^ of war. But now that he had got Madras,
M
154
HISTORY OF INDIA.
Dupleix changed his mind, and decided to keep it.
This roused the indignation of the Nawab, and he sent
his son, Maphuz Khan, with troops to compel its pro-
mised surrender. But the French were nothing daunt-
ed. They took the field, and defeated their late friend
and patron, in the decisive battle of St. Thome. This
battle had important results. Hitherto the English
and the French had been contented to be the vassals
of the Nawab. Now the position was inverted. The
Europeans were proved to be so strong in arms as to
be able to defeat powerful Indian rulers. They needed
no longer to sue for protection, but could instead dictate .
terms, even to the mighty Nawab of the Karnatic
himself. As for Duplei.x, his ambition was kindled, and
henceforth it became his set purpose to bring all
Southern India under the sway of France.
The French already owned enough territory in India
to make them wish for more. With Pondichery, Madras
and Karikal in his power— if Dupleix could only crush
the British, the French would indeed be supreme. The
Englishmen who escaped when Madras had been taken,
had strengthened themselves in Fort St. David. With-
out loss of time Paradis was sent to drive them from
the fort. But he was destined not to succeed, for an
English fleet, under Admiral Boscawen, appeared off
Pondichery, and the French had to hasten to the pro-
tection of their own capital. The war had reached this
point when the Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle was signed in
Europe in 1748, and as one of its conditions was the
mutual restitution of all conquests, the First Karnatic
War terminated with the English and French giving
each other back, what each had gained in the war.
Now that they were at peace between themselves
and with their neighbours, the French
Second ^^^d the English had more soldiers in
Karnatic war. ^^^^.^ ^^^^ ^^^^^ ^j^^^. j,^^^^, ^^.^^^ ^^ ^^
with. But it was not long before they found occupation
for them. In 1748 the Nizam-ul-Mulk, Subahdar of the
Sec. II] THE ENGLISH VS. THE FRENCH. 155
Deccan, died at Haidarabad. Among other descendants
he left two sons, Nadir (or Nazir) Jang; and Salabat
Jang, and a grandson, Muzaffar Jang. Nazir Jang had
been declared heir by his father. JMuzaffar Jang on the
other hand put in a claim. Nazir Jang, however, was
not disposed to give up his claim without resistance.
So he made preparations to fight for his rights, and he
appealed to the English to take up his cause. This
they agreed to do. Muzaffar Jang forthwith enlisted
the co-operation of the French. And so the old rivals
were once more pitted against each other. But another
complication now arose. When Dost Ali, the Nawab
of the Karnatic, had been taken prisoner by the Marathas,
the nawabship had been conferred on Anwar-ud-din.
Anwar-ud-din died at this time, and immediately the
succession to the throne of Arcot was disputed by
Chand (or Chanda) Sahib, son-in-law of Dost Ali, and
Muhammad Ali, son of Anwar-ud-din. Chanda Sahib
secured the support of the French, while the English
ranged themselves on the side of Muhammad Ali.
There was thus a strong combination of forces in which
the English, Nazir Jang, and Muhammad Ali opposed
the French, Muzaffar Jang, and Chanda Sahib. Thus
began the Second Karnatic War which was to settle the
succession to the thrones of Haidarabad and Arcot.
At the beginning of the war the French had much
success, and Muhammad Ali fled to Trichinopoli, leaving
Nazir Jang alone in the field. The French and their
allies concentrated against Trichinopoli, and were not
far from taking it when Clive came to the rescue by
suddenly capturing Arcot, the capital of the Karnatic.
Things now went badly for the French, and when Clive
won the decisive battle ofSriramgaon, 1752, and Chanda
Sahib was slain, Muhammad Ali was left without a rival
in the Karnatic. The war, however, lingered on, and
after varying fortunes on both sides, the French suffered
a crushiifg defeat at Trichinopoli, and were glad to come
to terms. The French Government at ihome was by
156 HISTORY OF INDIA.
this time weary of a profitless and expensive war.
Clive whose health had failed, was obliged in 1753 to
go to England. Dupleix was recalled, and Godeheu
was sent out in his stead, with express commands to
speedily make peace. The terms upon which hostilities
ceased, were that Muhammad Ali was to be Nawab of
Arcot, and Muzaffar Jang Subahdar of the Deccan,
1754-
But peace was not long to continue. In 1756, the
Seven Years' War broke out in Europe between the
English and the French, and so hostilities between
them were resumed in India. The French general,
Lally, promptly took Fort St. David, captured Arcot,
and laid siege to Madras. Meanwhile the English were
not without their successes. They obtained possession
of the Northern Circars, and induced the Subahdar of
the Deccan to desert the French, and throw in his lot
with them. Moreover, Colonel Eyre Coote worsted
the French at Wandiwash, 1760, and gained Arcot,
Devicota, and Karikal. But now what had happened
before happened again. In Europe peace was restored
by the Treaty of Paris, in 1763, and Pondicher)' was
given back to the French. The war, however, had
rudely shaken their power in India.
The English, on the other hand, prospered more
than before. In 1765, the Mughal
of"^e Enff'^^h Emperor conferred on them sovereign
over the Fpeneh. rights over the Northern Circars, and
as Muhammad Ali ruled over the
Karnatic by their permission, the East India Company
was practically, if not actually, master of all Southern
India from Orissa to Cape Comorin. Here, in the
south, Clive and Coote carried all before them, and in
Bengal, Warren Hastings was building up a lasting
empire. While he was Governor-General of the British
possessions in India, Chandarnagar and Pondichery
were captured from the French, in the course^ of the
Second Mysore War. They were, however, subsequently
Sec. II] THE ENGLISH VS. THE FRENCH. 1 57
restored when the Treaty of Versailles was signed
in Europe, 1783. But from this time the French
gave up hopes of acquiring an empire in India, and all
that now remains to them in this country is Chandar-
nagar, Karikal, Mahe, Ganam and Pondichery,
Section III.
Robert Clive and Warren Hastings.
1^44— I7j8 A.D.
IN 1744 Robert Clive came to Madras as a writer, or
clerk, in the service of the East India Company.
But subsequent events proved that the council chamber
and the battle-field were his proper spheres. For the
better understanding of the history of the times, let us
take a general survey of India, and recapitulate much
that has already been narrated.
It will be remembered how, in the closing years
of Aurangzeb's reign, the Mughal Em-
eal"^^^upvey^°of' R'^^ ^^^ begun to decline ; and how the
India. ' little that was left of it had been shat-
tered in 1739, by the invasion of Nadir
Shah, It has been seen how various soldiers of fortune,,
on the fragments of the Mughal Empire, set up kingdoms
for themselves in Oudh, Rohilkhand, Bengal, and the
Deccan. Meanwhile, the warlike Marathas acquired for
themselves, province after province in Southern, Western,,
and Central India ; and the Sikhs disputed the sovereign-
ty of the Punjab with the Emperor Ahmad Shah.
The Deccan, which included the Northern Circars and
the Karnatic, was in the hands of the Nizam-ul-Mulk,.
who also claimed Trichinopoli. The Nawab of the
Karnatic was his vassal ; but Mysore, Travancore and
Cochin were independent kingdoms.
The other powers in the south were the English
and the French. The former had their head-quarters at
Madras, and were the tenants of the Nawab of the
Karnatic. The French capital was Pondichery. Both
nations had come merely to traffic in the land, but they
were drawn into the quarrels which the Indian princes
had with one another, and were also subject to the results-
Sec. Ill] ROBERT CLIVE AND WARREN HASTINGS. I 59
Clives First
Period.
of political conflicts in Europe. And so in one way or
another they had gained a footing in the country.
The circumstances under which the English and
French were ranged against each other
in the First Karnatic War have already
been explained ; and the results of that
war will be remember-
ed. Dupleix and Clive
took part in the strug-
gle. When Paradis
took Madras, in 1746,
Clive was there, as also
in the campaign by
which the English at-
tempted to restore the
King of Tanjore to the
throne of which the
French had deprived
him. He was like-
wise present in the
army that resisted
Dupleix before Trich-
inopoli. Hitherto, as
Robert Ciive. Occasion demanded,
Clive had passed from the chair in his office to the battle-
field ; but now, 1 75 1, he finally resigned his clerkship,
and entered the army. It was at this time, while the
French were threatening Trichinopoli in the Second Kar-
natic War, that he restored the prestige of the Company
by capturing Arcot. His next achievement was to win
the Battle of Sriramgaon, 1752, after which the French
surrendered at Trichinopoli, and Cauda Sahib was killed
at the gates of his palace. Clive's health now broke
down, and he had to return to England ; but he went
with the satisfaction of knowing that but for him Dupleix
would have founded a French Empire in Southern
India. ,
The year 1755 saw Clive back as Governor and
l60 HISTORY OF INDIA,
, Commander of Fort St. George, with
and^ ^Hastfng's succession to the governorship of Madras.
First Period. At that time war with France was
proceeding, and he was on the point of
wresting the Deccan from French influence, when peace
was concluded in Europe, and hostilities in India had to
be dropped. And it was just as well, for Bengal demanded
the immediate services of Clive. In 1750, a young clerk
had come to Calcutta * — Warren Hastings. For the
superior parts that he exhibited, he was posted, in 1753,
to Kasimbazar, near Murshidabad, the capital of Bengal.
Three years later Ali Vardi Khan, the Nawab of Bengal,
Bihar, and Orissa, died, and was succeeded by his grand-
son, Siraj-ud-daulah. This young man picked a quarrel
with the English, suddenly seized their factory at Kasim-
bazar, and marched his prisoners — Hastings among
them— to Murshidabad. He then moved against Cal-
cutta, whence most of the English factors including
Drake, the governor, fled for safety to the ships on the
river. The city and its fort fell before the Nawab, who
* Early History of Calcutta.— it will be remembered that in
1656 the Nawab of Bengal made a gift of Hugliin Bengal to the Company.
Here they established a factory ; hut in 1686, owing to the oppression of
the Mughal authorities, they abandoned Hughli, and migrated to the village
of Sutanti, 26 miles lower down the river. Four years later the Emperor
Aurangzeb, made them a grant of land there, and permitted them to acquire
the two neighbouring villages of Kalikata and Govindpur. And soil came
about that Job Charnock, the President, on this site laid the foundation of
the present city of Calcutta. In 1698, permission having been obtained
to put the settlement in a state of defence, a fort was built. The town
.steadily grew in commercial importance, and Portuguese, Armenian,
Mughal and Hindu traders began to reside in it. Till 1707 its aftairs were
managed from Madras, but in that year it was made an independent
Presidency. In 1715 Dr. Hamilton, of the Company's Service, cured the
Emperor Farukhsiyar of a serious malady, and the grateful Monarch gave
the English permission to purchase 38 villages on either side of the river,
ten miles south of Calcutta In 1742 there was a scare that the Marathas
were planning an attack on the city, ami the native inhabitants dug a ditch
round a portion of the Company's boundaries as a protection. In 175'^»
when Warren Hastings first came to India, Mr. Barwell was governor of
the City. In 1752 he was succeeded by Mr. Drake — mentior of whom
brings us to the stirring times now being chronicled.
Sec. Ill] ROBERT CLIVE AND WARREN HASTINGS. l6l
demanded the money in the Company's Treasury. Fail-
ing in his attempts to find where the money was secreted,
he permitted 146 English prisoners to be shut up in a small
dungeon, ever since known in history as the Black Hole.
It was the month of June, and, as might
have been expected, when next morning yioie 1756
the only door to the room was opened
but 2^ of the victims were dragged out alive. Among
the survivors was Holwell w^ho, in the absence of Drake,
had assumed the head of affairs. He was put in irons,
and conveyed to Murshidabad. Clive was at Madras
when news came oi this calamity in Bengal. Forth-
with he and Admiral Watson were despatched to take
vengeance ; but they did not reach Bengal till December.
Watson demanded from Siraj-ud-daulah compensation
for the losses that had been inflicted on the English ;
but he remained defiant. So the army of retribution
retook Calcutta, and captured the French town of
Chandarnagar — for the double reason that the Seven
Years' War was going on in Europe with the English
and the French on opposite sides, and that the latter
had become the allies of the Nawab. Meanwhile this
ruler was not without secret enemies. His commander-
in-chief, Mir Muhammad Jafar, entered into league with
the English who promised to put him on the throne of
Murshidabad. This arrangement had been made through
the agency of Umachand (Amin or
Amir Chand), a wealthy merchant of Umaehand.
Calcutta. But at the last moment Uma-
chand threatened to reveal the secret to Siraj-ud-daulah,
unless a sum of 20 lakhs were paid him. The position
in which Clive found himself was most critical. He
resolved to fight the blackmailer with his own weapon,
and thus was led to the questionable act of palming off
on Umachand a false document which promised him the
hush-money he demanded. The Company's army then
marched on, and met the troops of Siraj-ud-daulah at
Plassey*, There the historic Battle of Plassey was fought
1 62 HISTORY OF INDIA.
p, on the 23rd June, 1757, and Siraj-ud-
Re?ults. ns?! "^^"^^^^ fl^d from the field— outmatched
by the daring of Clive, and betrayed by
the treachery of his own commander-in-chief. For, as
the result of the battle began to declare itself, Mir Jafar
withdrew his followers and went over to the enemy.
The English were now supreme in Bengal, Bihar, and
Orissa, and Mir Jafar became the Nawab at Murshidabad.
For his elevation he ceded to the English all the lands
south of Calcutta, delivered into the hands of his patrons
all the French factories in Bengal, and paid one crore
of rupees to the Company. Of Siraj-ud-daulah it only
remains to relate that he fled from Plassey to Rajmahal;
that he was there captured, and brought down to Mir
Jafar, who pitilessly put him to death.
Clive was now free to turn his attention to the
French, who, taking advantage of his
Coote and Lally. absence in Bengal, had under Lally,
captured Fort St. David and Arcot, and were besieging
Madras. Colonels Forde and Coote were despatched
from Bengal, and, defeating the French in several engage-
ments, gained possession of the Northern Circars. The
Subahdar of the Deccan, too, threw over the French,,
and entered into an alliance with the English.
While these events were transpiring in the south,.
Mir Jafar began to realise that he had
Mir Jafap. promised what he could not fulfil. In
paying the price of his nawabship he
had exhausted his treasury, and he could see no way of
replenishing it. The recurring demands for money
which he made on his wealthy subjects drove them
into discontent, so much so, indeed, that the Raja of
Purnia and the Governor of Bihar went into open rebel-
lion. Nor were his difficulties decreased by a threatened
invasion of Bengal by the Nawab Wazir of Oudh, and by a
son of Shah Alam of Delhi. In his heart of hearts, Mir
Jafar longed to rid himself of his dependence upon the
English, but the present stress of circumstances obliged
Sec. Ill] ROBERT CLIVE AND WARREN HASTINGS. 1 63
him to apply to them for help against his mutinous
vassals. Clive accordingly led an army to Patna, the
capital of Bihar, and entered the city in triumph (1759).
While he was thus engaged, Mir Jafar took advantage
of a war between the English and the Dutch in Europe,
and prevailed upon the latter to assist him in getting
free of his bondage to the Company. The Dutch were
only too willing to engage in hostilities with their
country's enemy ; but they were easil}^ routed at Biderra,
near Chinsurah, and Mir Jafar found himself in a worse
plight than before. Never again did the Dutch disturb
the tranquillity of India. Clive at this time, 1760, went
to England for a second time, and left Mr. Holwell,
Governor of Calcutta, in charge until Mr. Vansittart
arrived to dictate terms to Mir Jafar. The latter, in
despair, resigned his nawabship, and was removed to a
suburb of Calcutta, while his son-in-law, Mir Kasim AH,
was elevated to the vacant office. He contracted to
pay off the debts of his father-in-law, to endow the
Company with the revenues of Burdwan, Midnapur,
and Chittagong, and to contribute five lakhs towards the
expenses of the war in the Karnatic. Hastings, who
was stationed at Murshidabad during these years, ren-
dered valuable service in putting these negotiations
through, and he was rewarded with a seat in the
Calcutta Council.
Mir Kasim was an upright and firm ruler, and
. as he had undertaken heavy monetary
K-asim. responsibilities, he was determined to
improve his revenue by all lawful means. His efforts
to do so brought him into conflict with the Company.
The Company was exempted from all tolls and transit
duties on articles of commerce. But it was never intend-
ed that the private trade of the Company's servants
should escape taxation as it was doing. He, therefore,
brought the personal trade of Englishmen under the
same rates as those levied on every other trader. But
he was deprived of his dues by what he considered the
164 HISTORY OF INDIA.
dishonesty of English traders, who hoisted the Com-
pany's flag to protect there private trade from taxation.
This practice told against other traders who could not
escape the transit duties, and Mir Kasim felt, that the
only thing he could do under the circumstances was to
abolish all tolls and taxes on commerce. This he
accordingly did. The Calcutta Council protested ; but
the Nawab remained firm. The relation between
him and the English became more and more strained,
till finally war was declared (1763). The English took
Patna, which the Nawab speedily recovered, massacring
the English whom he found there. The Company's
troops then defeated the Nawab at Geriah, and captured
Monghyr. Major Adams presently retook Patna, and
Mir Kasim fled for protection to his late enemy, Shuja-ud-
daulah, the Nawab Wazir of Oudh, with whom the
homeless emperor, Shah Alam, also was finding shelter.
By this act he was considered to have vacated the
nawabship of Bengal, and Mir Jafar was reinstated
on promising to reimpose all the old transit duties against
his own subjects, and to pay large sums of money into
the Company's treasury. The war against Mir Kasim
continued. He and his allies were finally beaten at the
Battle of Buxar, 1764, and Allahabad was taken. Shuja-
ud-daulah's hopes of making conquests were now forever
extinguished, and the hapless Shah Alam threw himself
on the mercy of the victors. In the following year
Clive returned, and the Nawab Wazir was obliged to
sue for peace, for Oudh was overrun by the Company's
troops. The terms to which Shah Alam had to agree
were that Chunar should become a British possession,
and that the provinces of Kora and Allahabad, should
be administered for him by the Company, who were
also to receive from him a sum of fifty lakhs. Moreover,
the whole of Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa were to be given
to the English in return for an annual tribute of twent)'-
six lakhs.
While these arrangements were proceeding, -Hastings
Sec. Ill] ROBERT CLIVE AND WARREN HASTINGS. 1 65
went to England : but as already
stated Clive had come back as governor pepU)d 1765
of Calcutta, to the scene of his former
labours and triumphs. This was his third stay in India^
and he devoted it to the introduction of several impor-
tant reforms. After remodelling the army, he restricted
the private trade of the Company's servants. To com-
pensate them for it, and to remove from them all tempta-
tion to receive bribes, he proposed to increase their
salaries; but this the Court of Directors would not
sanction.
When Mir Jafar died in 1765, Clive setup that
nawab's son, Najm-ud-daulah, in his place, but the
conditions under which he ruled were greatly altered.
He was to exercise only the powers of Nizam, and to
be responsible for the peace of the three provinces of
Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa ; for the administration of
justice in the courts ; and for the enforce-
ment of obedience to law. The Company ofGovernmSit.
reserved to itself the Diwani of the
provinces, that is to say, its business would be to collect
the revenues, make all payments, and remit the surplus
to its own treasury. This Dual System of Government
did not work very long, for Najm-ud-daulah ceded
his Nizamat, and was content to be a cypher in return
for an annual allowance.
The arduous toils of the years 1765 and 1766
completed the ruin of Clive's health, and, having accom-
plished his life's work, he left the service of the Company,
and returned to England in 1767. Here his health never
returned; and eventually, in 1774, he put an end to
himself.
While Clive and Warren Hastings were away from
India, fresh complications took place in
Southern India, where Muhammad Ali p.^^^ Mysore
was Nawab of the Karnatic, Nazir Ali war, 1767-1769,
was Nizafn of the Deccan, and Haidar
Ali was Sultan of Mysore. In 1 767 the Marathas invaded
1 66 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Mysore, * and were bought off by Haidar Ali, who
was now joined by the Nizam, an ally ot the English,
who had contracted to assist him against his enemies.
Accordingly, Colonel Smith was sent to support him ;
but he treacherously turned upon the English army.
He was soon driven to sue for peace; but Haidar
Ali had still to be taken into account. He pressed
Madras so hard, that, in 1769, the English signed
an inglorious treaty by which they pledged them-
selves in future to fight for the Sultan, when he was
engaged in war. But it soon appeared that they
had made a rash promise; for in 1770, the Marathas
again invaded Mysore to recover tribute that had not
been paid to the Peshwa, and were assisted by Muham-
mad Ali, the Nawab of the Karnatic. Now, this Nawab
was a vassal of the English, and if they joined Haidar
Ali against the Marathas it meant that they must fight
against their ally. This they felt Ihey could not do,
and so they did not aid the Sultan against the Marathas.
The result was that the invaders appropriated half of
Mysore, and Haidar Ali never forgave the English for
failing him in the hour of his need.
In the previous year Hastings had returned to India
as a member of the Madras Council. In 1771, how-
ever, he was sent to Calcutta, where Verelst had
*The kingdom of Mysore has been frequently mentioned, and it has
been seen that it was ruled over by Hindu kings. In 1731 Dud Kishen
died, and imprisoning his successor Chama Raj, his two ministers Deva
Raj and Nanja Raj usurped all power. Among llie soldiers of Nanja Raj
was one Haidar Saheb or Haidar Ali, whose ance.-lors came frum the
Punjal). By his talents he worked his way up to the command of an inde-
pendent corps, and when later on territories were assigned to him, his am-
bition became so grent that, displat ing his patron, Nanja Raj, in 1760, he
took possession of all Mysore, ascended its throne, and continued the
imprisonment of Chama Raj. When hi-; son, Tipu, succeeded him, he abol-
ished the farce of a pageant ruler by reducing Krishna Raj VVadiar,
Chama Raj's son to beggary', and removing him and his relations to a
miseralile hovel outside the city. Here they were found when Seringa-
patani fell before the Knglish, in 1779, and the exile prince was taken under
the protection of the British, and restored to the throne of Mysore.
Sec. Ill] ROBERT CLIVE AND WARREN HASTINGS. 1 67
Easting's Se-
cond Period.
His Financial
Revenue, and
Judicial Re-
forms.
been succeeded by Cartier as governor.
On assuming the governorship of
Calcutta, he immediately carried out
the instructions which he had received
from the Directors of the East India
Company, and proceeded to take over
Bengal and Bihar absolutely, and to abolish the shadow
of power which was all that now belonged to the Nawab
of Murshidabad. These provinces, accordingly, passed
mto the actual possession of the English, and parcels of
land were farmed out to men of means for a fixed annual
rental. This was the origin of the Zemindars of Bengal and
Bihar. Hastings also removed the Company's exchequer
from Murshihabad to Calcutta. He appointed European
officers, under the now familiar designation of Collectors
to superintend the '
collection of reve-
nue, and to preside
over the courts of
justice, which he es-
tablished in every
district. Appeals
from these criminal
and civil courts lay
to theSadarDiwani
Adalat or Chief
Civil Court at
Calcutta, where also
the Sardar Nizamat
Adalat, or Chief
Criminal Court, was
founded. For the
administration of
justice, Hindu and
Muhammadan laws
were codified. Law-
lessness o^all kinds,
including ^dakaiti, was firmly put down. By these
Warren Hastings.
1 68 HISTORY OF INDIA.
measures Hastings laid the foundations of righteous
rule over the lands which Clive's sword had won.
We saw that, as a result of the Battle of Buxar, in
1 764, Shuja-ud-daulah, Nawab Wazir of Oudh, made over
the districts of Kora and Allahabad to Shah Alam, and it
was agreed that the English should hold them in his favour^
and pay him annually twenty-six lakhs for Bengal, Bihar,
and Orissa. But when the Marathas
War ^1772^^ entered Delhi, in 1770, Shah Alam ac-
' ' cepted their offer to restore him to the
throne of the Mughals, and he transferred to them
the districts of Kora and Allahabad which Clive had
restored to him, in 1765. As a matter of fact, when he
went to Delhi, he found that he was a prisoner, and
Hastings, therefore, felt himself justified in refusing to
continue to him the twenty-six lakhs for Bengal, Bihar
and Orissa, and further in making over, through ihe Treaty
of Benares, 1772, Kora and AllahalDad to the Nawab
Wazir of Oudh. In this same year the Marathas invad-
ed Rohilkhand. The Nawab Wazir of Oudh and the
English joined hands to help the Rohillas against their
oppressors. The Marathas were driven beyond the
Ganges, and the Rohillas were rescued from danger.
But now, instead of paying the Nawab Wazir the money
agreed upon as the price of his help, they entered into
negotiations with the Marathas themselves. A com-
bination between the two endangered Oudh and Bengal,
and to Hastings it appeared that the only alternative
was to conquer Rohilkhand, whose chiefs had broken
faith with their allies. So the Nawab Wazir entered
Rohilkhand, and with the assistance of the Company's
troops defeated the Rohillas at Katra, 1774, and Rohil-
khand changed masters.
These and other similar matters made it quite clear
that the East India Company was some-
thing more than a mere body of traders. Jf rJ?!.
It was to be included among the ruling
powers of the land ; and it was proper that the English
Sec. Ill] ROBERT CLIVE AND WARREN HASTINGS. 1 69
Parliament should control its political affairs. Accordingly
the Regulating Act of 1773 was passed. It established
the High Court of Calcutta, as the supreme court for all
India. The Governor of Calcutta was made Governor-
General, and was to direct the Company's affairs at
Bombay and Madras, with the assistance of a Council of
four members. In practice, however, the Act did not
work well, and Hastings found himself thwarted at
every turn by Philip Francis, a member of his Council,
and his bitter enemy. Francis and two other members
formed a perpetual majority, and did all they could to
insult and humiliate Hastings by opposing him in every
matter. For instance, when Shuja-ud-daulah, Nawab
Wazir of Oudh, died, he left the province to his son, Asaf-
ud-daulah. The Company was in honour bound to
continue to him the terms which had been settled by
treaty with his father. But in spite of Hastings' pro-
tests, the Francis majority in Council, revised those
terms, and imposed harder ones on him.
He was compelled to pay off his father's ^^^^p"^:?|Hl^{}
debts to the Company ; to increase, by ojprested by
50,ooorupees,the monthly subsidy for the the Council.
British garrison in Oudh ; and to agree
that the revenues of Benares should be paid direct by his
vassal, Chait Singh, to the English and not through him.
Now, this was altogether unfair ; for Chait Singh's grand-
father had acquired his property under the Mughals, and
was a vassal of the Nawab Wazir of Oudh, and an ally
of the English, inasmuch as he was under promise to
assist the Company with troops in time of need. But
more than this, Hastings' protests notwithstanding, the
Philip Francis majority permitted Asaf-ud-daulah's mo-
ther and grandmother, the Begums of Oudh, to appro-
priate about two crores of rupees, which Shuja-ud-daulah
had left in his treasury. They already had large and
valuable estates, and by Muhammadan law they had no
right to Shuja-ud-daulah's treasure. While Hastings was
figh'ting; for a just cause, his personal enemy, Nanda
I/O HISTORY OF INDIA.
Kumar, accused him before his Council of various acts
of fraud, oppression, and corruption. Hastings refused
to be judged by his Council, and referred the matter
to the Board of Directors. But Nanda « h c
Kumar fell into the pit which he had dug ^^^^^ Kumar.
for Hastings. He was found guilty by the Supreme Court
at Calcutta of obtaining a large sum of money from the
estate of a dead man by means of a forged bond. The
punishment for forgery was death, and Nanda Kumar
was sent to the gallows. It was maliciously said that
Hastings had contrived the removal of a man dangerous
to him. But it has been clearly established that Hastings
was as innocent of the charges brought against himself,
as he was unconnected with the fate of Nanda Kumar.
It will be remembered that in 1773, the Maratha
Peshwa, Narayan Rao, died, and his
First Maratha uncle, Raghunath Rao (or Raghoba as
War, 1775. he is commonly called) was made
Peshwa. But Nana Farnavis produced
a posthumous son of Narayan Rao, and determined to
secure the peshwaship to him, under the name of Madhu
Rao II. The various Maratha chiefs thereupon entered
the lists on opposite sides, and civil war began. Raghoba
applied for help to the English at Bombay, and without
the sanction of the Governor-General, by the Treaty of
Surat they agreed to assist him, if he would give them
Bassein and Salsette. This he reluctantly promised to do.
Although Hastings thought differently, the Court of Direc-
tors approved of the Treaty of Surat ; and so began the
First Maratha War. With ill-judged haste the Bomba}^
army marched against Poona ; but it was hemmed in by
the troops of Nana Farnavis, and had to retreat to
Wargaon. Here a Convention was signed, by which the
English restored to the Peshwa all that they had won in
Western India since 1765. Meanwhile, Raghoba had
taken shelter with the English at Surat. Nana Farnavis
demanded his surrender, and taking advantage of the
known hatred which Haidar All, Sultan of Mysore, bore
Sec. Ill] ROBERT CLIVE AND WARREN HASTINGS. I71
to the English, he instigated the Sultan to enter upon
hostilities against them. To do this Haidar Ali readily
consented. Thus the Company was embroiled
in practically two wars — one in the west against the
Marathas, and one in the south against Mysore. The
disgrace that had befallen the British at Wagaon,
urged Hastings to push the war on in earnest with the
Marathas, and Colonel Goddard, after a brilliant march
across the peninsula, took Ahmadabad, defeated Sindhia
and Holkar, and captured Bassein, while Captain
Pophan reduced the rock-perched fortress of Gwaliar.
The Marathas now suffered a series of defeats, and were
ready to accept terms. Accordingly the Treaty of
Salbai was signed by Sindhia and his party, 1782.
By it the Marathas undertook never more to enter
into alliance with the French ; to permit no nation other
than the English, to trade in their territories ; and to give
Raghoba a pension of four lakhs a year. The English
acknowledged Madhu Rao II as Peshwa, but retained
Gwaliar, and restored Bassein and Gujarat to the infant
Peshwa, for whom Nana Farnavis had fought. Thus
ended the First Maratha War.
Freed from the struggle with the Marathas, Hastings
was now able to give all his attention to the war
in the south. Its immediate cause was
that against the remonstrance of Haidar wap,"l78a ^°^^
Ali, the English had captured Mahe ;
a French possession in Mysore. Haidar Ali was long-
ing for an opportunity to take revenge upon the
English, for allowing him to be deprived of half of his
kingdom by the Marathas, in spite of the promise
they had made him in the Treaty of Madras. So,
joined by the French, and encouraged by the Mara-
thas, he suddenly raided the Karnatic, captured Arcot,
and appeared within nine miles of Madras, while
his son, Tipu, laid siege to Wandiwash. Meanwhile
Colonel Baillie was severely defeated at Conjeve-
ram*.^'*Poote, however, soon came to the rescue from
172 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Bengal, and having worsted Haidar's army, near Porto
Novo, went to the aid of Madras. Alarmed by the
arrival of British reinforcements, Tipu raised the siege of
Wandivvash ; and the prospects of the Company still
further improved by their victory at Shalingarh. But
a new diversion was caused by a war breaking out m
Europe, in which England fought against Holland and
France. It spread to India, where the Dutch and the
French offered assistance to Haidar Ali, with the result
that the field had to be taken against them. In 1781,
Negapatam and Trincomali were taken from the Dutch,
but in the following year, they regained Trincomali and
Cuddalore. Haidar Ah now died at Chittur, and in his
turban — so it was said — was found a paper in which he
directed his son, Tipu, to make peace with the English.
But if the Marathas had laid aside their arms because of
the Treaty of Salbai, the French were still waging war;
and Tipu determined to fight on with their help. As has
been elsewhere related, Bussy commanded the French
forces, and several battles were fought with varying re-
sults, till the Treaty of Versailles terminated the warfare
between the Enghsh and the French. Though left
alone, Tipu did not yield till Mangalore was taken from
him. Then he signed a treaty at that place, and each
side had its former possessions restored.
The Treaties of Salbai and Mangalore mark an era
in Indian history. Single-handed the English had tri-
umphed over the combined armies of the Marathas, the
French, the Dutch, and Haidar Ali. This finally estab-
lished their superiority. The surrounding powers saw
that a quarrel with the English would plunge them into
a costly war, and that the probabilities of success were
against themselves. The Marathas, too, realised that it
was vain to endeavour to build a Hindu Empire on the
ruins of the dominions of the Great Mughal.
But the prolonged wars by which this prestige was
won, had emptied the Company's treasury. The pro-
prietors of the Company grumbled at heavy exneniiiture
Sec. Ill] ROBERT CI.IVE AND WARREN HASTINGS. 173
and no profits, and Hastings began to Hastings's Deal-
look about for means whereby to re- ings with Chait
plenish the Company's coffers. It Singh and the
seemed to him that Raja Cbait Singh of Begumsof Oudh.
Benares and the Begums of Oudh had behaved in such
a way during the recent wars as to justify him in
punishing them with heavy fines. The conditions under
which Chait Singh ruled from 1775, have already been
stated. From that date his vassalage had been to the
Enghsh, and not to the Nawab Wazir of Oudh. He had,
moreover, bound himself to supply the English, in times
of pressing need with money and men. During the late
wars with the Marathas and Haidar Ali, Hastings
had called upon him to send some troops. He had
sent none. Were his breach of faith to be allowed to
pass unvisited, other tributary chiefs might follow his
example. This was obviously a serious matter ; and
after some parle3nng, Hastings imposed a fine of 50 lakhs
on him. Chait Singh hesitated ; Hastings proceeded to
Benares to exact the penalty ; and Chait Singh was made
a prisoner in his own palace. He, however, managed to
escape to Ramnagar, and put himself at the head of an
army, part of which had been sent him by the Begums of
Oudh. He was encountered by Popham at Bijaigarh, and
defeated. But Popham's soldiers looted all the treasure
they found, and Hastings therefore gained nothing for
the Company. However, the province of Benares was
given to Chait Singh's nephew on the condition that the
revenue which his uncle had been accustomed to pay
the Company was to be doubled.
It has already been related that the Begums of
Oudh had, with the consent of the Council, but against
law, and against Hastings' wish, possessed themselves of
about two crores of rupees, which Shuja-ud-daulah had
left on his death, and which in justice belonged to Asaf-
ud-daulah. Deprived of nearly half his patrimony this
prince"*Was not able to pay his dues to the Company,
indeed, /ear by year he was sinking deeper and deeper
174 HISTORY OF INDIA.
into the Company's debt. He reminded Hastings of
the circumstances under which the Begums had deprived
him of his birthright. Left to Hastings they would
never have had the money, and now that the Francis
majority no longer hampered him, Hastings was willing
to undo a shameful wrong. Besides this, the Begums
had assisted Chait Singh in his rebellion, and it was
necessary that they should be punished. He therefore
signed the Treaty of Chunar which gave Asaf-ud-daulah
permission to resume the jagirs of the Begums, and to
recover from them the two crores of rupees of which
they had deprived him. The Begums did not meekly
submit. They fought against Asaf-ud-daulah, but he
prevailed, and in addition to resuming their jagirs
he took away from them the two crores of rupees.
Hastings, however, saw that they were provided with
liberal pensions. Asaf-ud-daulah now paid his debt to
the Company.
In 1784 Pitt's India Bill was passed by Parliament.
Recognising the great political power
Pitt's India ^-^^^ ^^ie East India Company had be-
come, it was now put under the direct
control of a Board of Ministers.
Early in the following year Hastings laid down the
reins of office in favour of Sir John
ISI'Jwopk. Macpherson and returned home His
career, if full of anxiety and toil, had
been a distinguished one. When he came to Bengal, in
1772, he found the province in disorder and distress.
Lawlessness prevailed on every side ; the strong ever
oppressed the weak. The Nawab of Bengal's officers
and the servants of the Company plundered the
peasants, and had no respect for authority. There
was no proper form of government. Before he left
these shores he had extended the influence, the prestige,
and the honour of the Company. He replaced dis-
order by a set form of government and an estaoifshed
code of laws. His wisdom and foresight were so
Sec. Ill] ROBERT CLIVE AND WARREN HASTINGS. 1 75
great that it may in truth be said that the Indian
Government of to-day is essentially the system which
he introduced.
But he was not honoured as he deserved to be.
His many enemies, instigated and tutor-
The Impeach- ed by men like Philip Francis, impeach-
iS|s!^ "^^' ed him before the House of Lords for
his dealings with Chait Singh and the
Begums of Oudh, and for the Rohilla War. For seven
long years the trial lasted, and he was in the end
honourably acquitted on every charge that his enemies
had preferred against him. For a century his fame
has been tarnished with the suspicion that he was
responsible for the execution of Nanda Kumar, and for
all the misery that men of the Francis type had charged
him with producing. But recent investigation has
endorsed his acquittal by Parhament, and to-day we
remember him among the greatest men whom England
has ever sent to India. It is true that the expenses of
a protracted trial ruined him, for he did not return home
as many others did, fabulously rich. But before he died,
in 18 1 8, he had the satisfaction of knowing that his
nation honoured him. For when he was 80 years old
he was summoned to give evidence on Indian affairs
before the House of Commons, and as he left the
House, the members rose, removed their hats, and
stood in silence.
CHAPTER Xll.
The Later Period of the Company :
The Building up of the English Empire in India,
The GovernorS'General after Hastings.
1785—1^58 A.D.
SIR John Macphepson, 1785-1786,— Sir John Mac-
pherson acted as Governor-General for twenty
months; but nothing of any importance took place
while he managed the affairs of the Company. It was,
however, very evident that Tipu, though defeated, was
not crushed, and that he was only waiting for something
to occur that would give him an excuse for declaring
war upon the English.
Lord Copnwallis, 1786-1793.— Lord Comwallis
His Policy came to India with the determination to
adopt a policy of non-intervention in the
affairs of native states,
and thus to keep out of
wars, and to reform the
Company's service. It
will be remembered that
both Clive and Warren
Hastings tried to put
down bribery and private
trade, and that they did
not meet with complete
success. Comwallis took
more active steps to
purify the service, and
though he made himself
unpopular by his mea-
sures, still he had the
satisfaction of pu.t^''^.g an
, , „ ,,. end to much of the
Lord Cornwalhs.
CH. XII] GOVERNORS-GENERAL AFTER HASTINGS. 1 77
bribery and corruption that had hitherto been common
in the Company's service.
As has been said, Tipu Sultan was still eager for
war, and so he made an unprovoked
attack on the Raja of Travancore, The Third Mysore
knowing that he was an ally of the War. 1790-1792.
English. Of course there was no
help for it but to take up the cause of the Raja ;
and so began the Third Mysore War, 1 790-1 792. The
Nizam of Haidarabad was jealous of Tipu, and the
Marathas were bitter against him for his cruel persecu-
ft
178 HISTORY OF INDIA.
tion of Hindus in the Deccan. It was, therefore, no
difficult matter for Cornwallis to gain the co-operation
of the Nizam and of Nana Farnavis. When all was
ready Cornwallis went to the south, and himself
conducted the war. After some reverses, Bangalore was
taken by storm, in 1791, and Tipu retired tor shelter to
his capital, Seringapatam. The city was on the point ot
capitulating when Tipu sued for peace, which was
granted him on condition that he ceded to the Enghsh
the districts of Dindigal, Baramahal, and Malabar ; that
he restored Coorg to its Hindu Raja ; that he paid a
heavy fine ; and that he delivered up two of his sons as
hostages. Having concluded this war, Cornwallis
turned his attention to the reformation of the Civil
Service, and to the permanent settlement of the land
revenues.
While the Mughals ruled, the taxes on land had
been arbitrary, and the ryots never knew
what would be exacted from them l^^ZmS'nT^^'
Ihey, therefore, did not feel secure, and Bengal, 1793.
had no wish to improve their fields, or to
reclaim jungles, and uncultivated areas. Things were
somewhat better when the English acquired the Diwani
of Bengal, in 1765, for then the land taxes were fixed by
annual or five yearly assessments. The Company's
servants collected the revenues, and after deducting the
Company's share of the taxes, handed the balance over
to the zemindars. In 1789 a change was made by which
the zemindars themselves collected the revenues, and paid
its share of the income to the Company. But in 1793
Cornwallis decided upon fixing the revenues of Bengal
once and for all, so far as the Company was concerned.
He accordingly directed the zemindars to give the ryots
pattas of their lands and to levy the land tax fairly.
When this was done the ryots, feeling safe against exac-
tions, began to clear jungles and reclaim swamps. They
soon became a contented peasantry, and the zent.iimars
grew into a body of loyal and respectable gentry. ^ While
Ch.XII] governors-general after HASTINGS. 1 79
the natives of the soil gained by the Permanent Settle-
ment, as it is called, the British have in the end lost much
revenue. For whereas the value and area of rented land
has increased immeasurably, and zemindars are reaHsing
greatly increased incomes, the Government of to-day
is receiving just the same revenue as it did in 1793-
But if there has been a loss in money, there has been
an incalculable gain politically. The loundation of all
government is in the goodwill of the subjects, and the
Permanent Settlement of Bengal has bound the people
in loyal devotion to the British Government.
The Civil Service was full of inconsistencies. Some
rules prevailed in some places, other
Reforms the ^.^igg ^^ q^^^q^- places. The result was
uvu service. ^^^^ ^^^ servants of the Company had
no proper set of regulations for their guidance. Corn-
wallis desired to introduce more order and uniformity.
He therefore published a Code " which defined and set
bounds to authority, created procedure, guarded against
miscarriage of justice, and founded the Civil Service of
India as it exists to this day."
Sip John Shore, 1793-1798, was the next Gover-
nor-General. He meant to follow a
Adopts the policy non-intervention policy, that is to say,
of Non-interven- ^gdid not think it right for the English
^^^' to take sides in the quarrels of Indian
princes, or in any way to try to arbitrate between them.
This may at one time have been possible ; but previous
Governors-General had promised certain rulers, e.g-.,
the Nizam of Haidarabad, to help them in the event of
their being attacked by another power. The observance
of a non-intervention policy necessitated inaction, and in
such cases inaction amounted to a breach of treaties. The
Marathas were quick to observe that the new Governor-
General would not act as a check on their ambitions,
and ^J€y saw in the present a favourable opportunity
for combining to crush the Nizam of Haidarabad.
l80 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Nana Farnavis led the forces of the Maratha Con-
federacy, and the Nizam suffered a fatal defeat at the
Battle of Kurdla, 1795, and was obliged to cede to the
victors much of his territories, and to pay them three
crores of rupees. But later experience of Indian politics
convinced Sir John Shore that a policy of non-interven-
tion was a mistake. Accordingly, when the misrule of
Oudh became intolerable, he deposed the Nawab Wazir,
and set up Saadat Ali in his stead.
The Marquis of Wellesley, 1798-1805.— Lord
Mornington, who was afterwards created
Marquis of Wellesley, succeeded. The Foupth Mysore
non-intervention policy of Shore had led
Tipu Sultan to cherish the idea that he might do as he
pleased without running any risk. He even dared to
intrigue with the French against the Enghsh. To coun-
teract their union, Wellesley immediately entered into a
treaty with the unfortunate Nizam of Haidaradad, by
which the latter agreed to dismiss all French officers in
his army, to employ no Frenchmen in his kingdom, and
to accept an Enghsh army of 6000 sepoys, with English
commanders and artillery, for his protection against
external wars. Two years later, his much dreaded ene-
mies the Marathas, threatened to invade the Deccan,
and the Nizam, greatly alarmed, asked for an increased
force, offering to give the Company all he had conquered
from Tipu, and to submit all his disputes to British
arbitration.
Meanwhile, encouraged by the presence of Napoleon
Bonaparte in Egypt (where eventually Nelson so com-
pletely broke the power of the French), Tipu invited
the French to join him in waging war upon the English.
Wellesley felt that no time was to be lost, and support-
ed by the Nizam and the Marathas, he promptly sent
General Harris into Mysore. Tipu's army was defeated
at Malvelli, and his capital Seringapatam was b-^o/eged
and taken (1800). Tipu himself was slain in the breach
Ch. XII] GOVERNORS-GENERAL AFTER HASTINGS. l8l
by which the British entered the city. So ended the
Fourth (and last) Mysore war. Kanara, Coimbatore,
Darapuram, and some other portions of Mysore were
annexed ; Gooty and Gurramkonda were made over to
the Nizam, and what remained of Tipu's dominions was
given to Krishna Raj Wadiar, the lawful representative
of the old Hindu Rajas of Mysore, whom Haidar Ali
had dispossessed. Thus not only was a troublesome
neighbour blotted out, but also French influence received
another fatal blow.
While war was preparing between Tipu Sultan and
the English, Muhammad Ali, the Nawab
Oudh and oUier ^^. ^^^^ Karnatic, thought he would secure
States. himself by joining what appeared to
him to be the stronger side. And so
he had entered into negotiations with Tipu. For thus
forgetting his treaty obligations to the Company,
on the conclusion of the late war, the entire civil and
military government of the Karnatic was assumed b}'^
the English, who, on Muhammad Ali's death, allowed his
heir one-fifth of the annual revenues. At the same time
by the consent of the princes of Tanjore and Surat these
territories practically passed into the hands of the
Company. The province of Oudh had always been the
cause of more or less anxiety ; for beside its own
unsettled internal condition, it was the only door through
which the British possessions in Bengal could be invaded.
A threatened invasion by Shah Zeman, brought things to
a head, and feeling that the Nawab Wazir, Saadat Ali,
could not possibly repel the invader, Wellesley demanded
of the Wazir that he should pay for the maintenance of
a larger British subsidiary army for the protection of
Oudh. After some resistance the Wazir signed the Treaty
of Lucknow, in 1801, by which he ceded the Doab and
Rohilkhand to form a barrier between Oudh and enemies
from the north, and to pay for the up-keep of the
increased British force in Oudh. Whatever may be
thoughT,of Wellesley's dealings with the Wazir, he at
l82 HISTORY OF INDIA.
any rate was satisfied with the reflection that whereas
he had found Oudh a danger to the British in India, he
had converted it into a safeguard and a support. And
as we look into the past we are forced to the conclusion
that if Wellesley had at this time taken complete control
of Oudh, perhaps the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857 would
never have occurred.
On the death of Nana Fa mavis, in 1800, there was
a general scramble among the members
Treaty of of the Maratha Confederacy for supreme
assein power. Now Holkar prevailed over
Sindhia, and now Sindhia triumphed over Holkar ; and
between the two, the Peshwa, Baji Rao II, was in a
very difficult position. In 1802, he was in the power
of Sindhia, so that when Holkar defeated his rival, and
entered Poona he made Warnak Rao Peshwa. Baji
Rao II fled to Bassein, and there appealed to the
English for help. His petition was favourably received,
and he signed the Treaty of Bassein by which it was
agreed that an English force was to be always retained
in the Peshwa's dominions ; that part of these dominions
was to be given to the Company for the maintenance
of this force ; and that the 'peshwa would enter upon
neither treaties nor wars without the approval of the
English. This Treaty of Bassein marks an important
stage in the history of the British in India ; for whereas
previously to it there had existed a Biiiish Empire in
India, the treaty gave the Company the Empire of
India.
As soon as the Marathas found that the exiled
Peshwa had been taken under the pro-
w^^^lsol^^^^^ teclion of the Company they were alarm-
war, i»u . ^^^ ^^^^ forgetting their' own petty
jealousies and differences, they made a strong combina-
tion against the common foe whose armies had subdued
the Nizam and crushed Tipu. Under the protection of
the English, Baji Rao re-entered Poona, and^so the
Maratha chiefs were brought to bay. General Sir Arthur
ChXII] governors-general after HASTINGS. 183
Wellesley (brother to the Governor-General, and better
known in history as the great Duke of Wellington, who
won the Battle of Waterloo), took Ahraadnagar, and,
while Holkar kept aloof in Malwa, uncertain how to
act, defeated the combined forces of Sindhia and Bhonsla
at Assaye, and the army of the latter at Argaon. The
fortress of Gawilgarh was next captured, and Bhonsla,
laying down arms, signed the Treaty of Deogaon, by
which among other things he gave up all claims to chant
from the Nizam, and ceded a tract of country including
Cuttack. Thus ended the war in the Deccan. Mean-
while, the army of Sindhia, under the French general,
Perron, held out in Northern India where General Lake
took Aligarh, and won the Battle of Delhi. After releas-
ing the aged Emperor, Shah Alam, from the imprison-
ment which he had experienced for some years, at the
hands of the Marathas, Lake added the capture of Agra
to his previous successes, and finally annihilated the
army of Sindhia at the Battle of Laswari. This chieftain
had no alternative but to come to terms, and he signed
the Treaty of Surji Arjangaon, by which he gave the
English the tract of land between the Ganges and the
Jumna, Baroch, as well as other portions of his dominions,
including Ahmadnagar, which was made over to the
Peshwa, Baji Rao II. Moreover, as the French had
assisted him in fighting, he was obliged to contract never
to entertain the subjects of any nation at war with the
English. So concluded the Second Maratha War, which
began and ended in 1803.
But though Bhonsla and Sindhia had been humbled,
Holkar had yet to be disposed of. He
had not taken any part in the Second war^iSOS^fsM
Maratha War ; but he had been by no '
means idle. He had employed the interval in gathering
together an army of 80,000 trained soldiers, and when
he considered himself strong enough to take the field,
even against the English, he began to ravage Malwa
and kaj^jitana. Now, the Rajput chiefs were British
184 HISTORY OF INDIA.
allies, and the only reply he gave to remonstrances from
Calcutta was to sack Ajmir. War was now inevitable.
Accordingly, three British armies moved against him
from different directions. Lake advanced from Delhi ;
Colonel Murray from Gujarat, and Colonel Monson from
Central India. Monson, worsted in every engagement,
was obliged to retreat to Agra, but Murray gained pos-
session of Indore, Holkar's capital. Holkar tiien laid
siege to Delhi, but retired on the approach of Lake.
The English army then triumphed at Farukhabad and
Dig ; but the attempt to take the fortress of Bhartpur,
whose Raja had deserted the English for Holkar, failed,
and its Raja was given favourable terms. The progress
of the war, however, had convinced the Gaekwar of
Baroda that the Enghsh were irresistible, and he entered
into a subsidiary alliance with the Company, Holkar
was now the only member of the Maratha Confederacy
who was outside such an alliance, and though he was
single-handed in the strife, he so bravely kept the field
that Sindhia and Bhonsla were encouraged to throw off"
their alliance with the British. By this time the Court
of Directors had grown weary of Wellesley's ceaseless
wars, and recalled him. But in order to trace the present
war to its close let us anticipate events. When, on the
death of Lord Cornwallis, Sir George Barlow came as
Governor-General, in 1805, he brought with him the dis-
tinct order that peace should be made without delay.
And so, although Holkar could not have held out much
longer, the war was concluded on the easiest terms by
Barlow, who to pacify Sindhia gave him Gohud and
Gwaliar.
In the time of Akbar, it will be remembered that
peace had been introduced by the presence of one domi-
nant emperor, aud Wellesley was convinced that the
only means by which peace could again be secured, was
by some one power again becoming supreme. He deter-
mined that the English should be that power.^and his
administration was guided by the leading Jdea. He
Ch. XII] GOVERNORS-GENERAL AFTER HASTINGS. 185
therefore devised the system of Subsidiary
AlHances. Every native state entering The System of
into such an alliance paid for the pre- freatfe^.^^
sence within it of a body of British
troops for the preservation of internal order, and for its
protection against external foes. It also maintained a
contingent of native soldiers to act with the British
forces in times of emergency. It engaged to have no
political dealings with other powers except in concert
with the English Government, and undertook to submit
to British arbitration all disputes with aliens. Thus in
point of fact, in return for protection, all subsidiary
states placed themselves in a position of dependence
upon the East India Company.
When Wellesley came to India, what with Tipu
Sultan, and the French, and the Marathas, the land was
rent by war. Wellesley asserted British dominancy
over them. By his aggressive policy he destroyed the
Muhammadan power of the south. By drawing into
Subsidiary Alliances every member of the Maratha Con-
federacy, excepting only Holkar, he w n 1 '
created a system of imperial rule, and Wopk. ^
acquired for England the Empire of India,
thereby extinguishing the last lingering hopes of the
French and the Dutch in the East. For this achievement
he holds a high place among the architects of British
fortunes in India. He changed the character of the East
India Company from a mere body of traders to a Govern-
ment with imperial responsibihties, and he has therefore
been aptly called " the Great Pro-Consul of India."
Lord Copnwallis (again) 1805 — Cornwallis, whose
previous administration had proved his desire to
promote peace and to develop the resources of the
British possessions in India, was sent out to succeed
Wellesley. He had clear instructions to terminate the
wars, with the Marathas ; but before he could accomplish
anythmg he died at Ghazipur, and was buried there.
o
1 86 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Sir George Barlow, 1805-1807. — It lias already
been mentioned that as soon as Sir George Barlow came
he made peace with Holkar, and to such extremes
did he carry the non-intervention policy, that when
Sindhia and Holkar took their revenge on the
Rajputs, he left them to the tender mercies of the
Marathas — Wellesley's compact with them notwith-
standing.
At Vellore the sepoys grew discontented, and,
. urged by the descendants of Tipu, they
1806 ^ ^^^"^ massacred 113 European soldiers in the
garrison The mutiny was easily put
down, and Tipu's family was removed to Bengal. Sir
George Barlow was recalled as having been an unsuc-
cessful ruler.
Lord Minto, 1807-1813. — Encouraged by the in-
activity of the English, who now
Central India allowed the non-intervention policy to
regulate all their dealings with native
rulers, bands of outlaws (the most notorious of whom
were the Pathans and the Pindaris) began to flourish
in Western and Central India, where ihey devasta-
ted the countr\% and made the people homeless.
But when Bandalkhand, which bordered on British
territory, became the scene of pillage and the murder of
inoffensive people, Lord Minto thought it was better
to put down these outlaws than to wait till they actually
raided British territory. He accordingly sent troops
after them, and in 18 12 they were suppressed for the
time being. Kalinjar was taken, and the country pacified.
At the same time a protective treaty was made with
Ranjit Singh of Lahore, by which the latter bound
himself not to interfere with the Sardars of the Cis-
Sutlej State.
War was at this time going on betv^'een England
and France, and it was feared that the French would
make one more effort to drive the Engli^li'^ut of
Ch. XII] GOVERNORS-GENERAL AFTER HASTINGS. 1 87
India. As a safeguard, Lord Minto sent
embassies to the courts of Sindh, Kabul, |"^5h^^lf^u*9
and Persia, whose rulers in consequence and Per^a
engaged to have no dealings with the
French, nor give them any assistance. He also made a
friendly treaty v^'ith the Baluchi chiefs. But it was felt
that something more definite than this should be done
to check the French and the Dutch, who had begun to
waylay British ships on the high seas, and plunder tiiem.
Mauritius and its adjacent islands belonged to France,
and from them the piratical vessels started on their
errands of spoliation. To put a stop to the loss thus
caused to the Company's trade, Lord Minto sent an ex-
pedition agamst Mauritius, and took it and its neighbour-
ing islands from the French. Similarly the Dutch were
stripped of their possessions in the East Indies.
Another important event took place in 18 13.
Hitherto, it will be remembered, the East
India Company had held the monopoly Abolition of
of Indian trade. That is to say, no private Indian '"^Mono-
person or body of merchants was allowed poly, 1813.
to carry on commerce with India. When
Parliament now renewed the Charter, it withdrew
from the Company the exclusive right which it had
hitherto enjoyed, of trading with this country, but did
not deprive it of its monopoly in tea or of trade with
China.
Lord Moira, (afterwards Marquis of Hastings),
1813-1823,— On the retirement of Minto,
Lord Moira succeeded. He found that he The Marathas,
was called upon to deal with a certain palhln's.' ^^^
class of dangerous brigands and warlike
men, known respectively as the Pindaris and the Pathans.
Added to the restlessness which these enemies to peace
created, there was the growing turbulence of the
Marathas. The weakness shown in Lord Minto's dc-al-
ings'^wfth Holkar and Sindhia, encouraged in the Marathas
l88 HISTORY OF INDIA.
the notion that the time was near at hand when they
would avenge the past, expel the English from India,
and once more restore the days of Sivaji. Their acts of
defiant lawlessness knew no bounds. In the Pindaris
and the Pathans they found allies ready to receive their
assistance, and quick to do their bidding. The Pindaris
flourished in the valley of the Narbada. They were
descended in most instances from soldiers who had been
in the Mughal army during its palmy days. The robber
instinct was so strong in them that they could not lead
peaceful lives. Under the leadership of chiefs like
Wasil Muhammad, Karim Khan, and Chitu, they yearly
set out on their hardy ponies to burn, plunder and
destroy. Their depredations extended from Mysore to
the basin of the Jumna. They had no form of govern-
ment nor any definite policy, but joined Holkar or
Sindhia as best suited them, or as either was the more
likely to win. In 1809, they had raided Gujarat; in
1 81 2 they had pillaged Mirzapur ; and now, in 181 6,
they came like a swarm of locusts into the Northern
Circars, and Moira felt it was time to extirpate them.
The Pathans were a more respectable and better
organised body of freebooters. The Pindaris attacked
villages and their helpless inhabitants ; the Pathans
preyed upon governments and princes. They were better
disciplined than the Pindaris, and rendered obedience
to their leaders, chief among whom was Amir Khan.
They devoted their energies especially to Rajputana.
What with the Marathas, the Pindaris, and the
Pathans, Central India was indeed in a sad plight. The
native states were demoralised ; society was disorganised;
the peasants and artisans had no heart to carry on the
duties of their daily hfe. While robber bands infested
the country, the local armies themselves existed only to
trample on the people. In a word, government there
was none. Like Wellesley, Hastings felt that the only
salvation of India lay in the arising of some one para-
mount power whose mighty arm would be strong en'ough
Ch.XII] governors-general after HASTINGS. 189
to keep under the warring elements and protect the
peasantry — a power which by alHances and force of arms
would build up an empire even greater than that of the
Mughals. But before he could dispose of the Pindaris
and the Pathans, his attention was demanded in another
direction.
Of late the hardy mountaineers of Nepal, known as
the Gurkhas, had taken to making in-
cursions into the valley of the Ganges {g^J^igSs ^^^'
which belonged to the English. When
the Governor-General proposed to fix their frontiers,
they became more daring and defiant, and as they con-
tinued their inroads into British territory, it was evident
that nothing short of war would persuade them to mend
their ways. Accordingly, the deep jungles of the
Himalayas were entered by a British army, under com-
mand of General Ochterlony. The rugged mountain
sides were of great advantage to the Gurkhas who were
quite at home in the precipices and ravines of the
greatest mountain range in the world. The war opened
unfavourably to the English ; for although General
Gillespie took the fort of Kalanga, they experienced a
reverse at Jaitak. The occupation of a portion of the
Terai, and the co-operation of the Raja of Sikkim,
partially compensated for this misfortune.
The news of the failure of Enghsh arms in the war
against the Gurkhas naturally encouraged the Marathas,
who, like the Pathans and the Sikhs, began to give fresh
signs of activity. The Pindaris, too, finding the Enghsh
sufficiently occupied with the Gurkhas, prepared to
make a raid into British territory. Altogether the out-
look was far from pleasant But internal dissensions
weakened the counsels of the Marathas, and a threaten-
ed attack on Ranjit Singh, the leader of the Sikhs, by
the Amir of Kabul, prevented the Marathas and the
Sikhs from entering upon hostilities against the English.
The' rfhdaris did not feel that single-handed they could
defy the Enghsh, and so they too held back from doing
190 HISTORY OF INDIA.
any mischief. Hastings, with a feeling of relief, bent
all his energies to the war with the Gurkhas. To cause
a diversion, with the help of Rohilla levies, he invaded
the Nepalese province of Kumaun, and gained possession
of it, together with its many strongholds. The tide of
war now turned in favour of the English, and their
further successes gave them possession of all Nepal
west of the river Kali, and of Jaitak. The Gurkhas
came to terms, and signed the Treaty of Segauli (1816).
By it they were required to cede all the country
conquered by the English from the Sutlej to the Kali,
and that portion of the Terai between the Kali and the
Gandak. But the mountaineers did not ratify the treaty
till General Ochterlony marched within 20 miles of
Katmandu, and captured Hariharpur. Then the in-
dependence of the Sikkim Raja was assured, and he and
the Nawab Wazir of Oudh were rewarded for the support
they had given. A frontier was traced out and marked
by pillars of masonry, and in lieu of an annual subsidy
of two lakhs of rupees a greater part of the Terai was
restored to Nepal. Ever since this time the Gurkhas
have been loyal to the English.
Now that the Gurkha War was over, Hastings
was able to give his attention to the
gmlapi War, pjndaris, who at this time ravaged the
Northern Circars and Orissa. His first
care was to deprive them of allies, and so he entered
into subsidiary alliances with Malwa, Bhopal, Udaipur,
Jodhpur, Baji Rao H, (the Peshwa,) and Amir Khan,
the chief of the Pathans. Hastings himself took com-
mand of the army, and deprived the Pindaris of the
help which Sindhia was ready to give them, by making
the latter come to terms at Gwaliar. The Pindaris,
from their headquarters in Malwa, had been watching
the progress of events. Unable any longer to remain
inactive, they raided Bandelkhand, being led by Wasil
Muhammad. At the same time the Peshvytt'^and
Bhonsla assisted them, and the Third Maratha War
CH.XII] governors-general after HASTINGS. I9I
began. But Hastings pressed the Pindaris till, in 18 17,
they were driven out of Malwa and beyond the
Chambal. They then sued for peace, and have since
never caused further trouble. To Amir Khan, the
Pathan leader, the principality of Tonk was given, and
thus the Pathan organisation came to an end. The
Rajput Chiets were rewarded for their loyal support, and
a British Resident was stationed at Ajmir.
In their anxiety to see the English expelled from
India, the Maratha Houses combined
once more, and, as has been said, openly war ISiT-fsiQ.^
gave help to the Pindaris. Baji Rao H,
the Peshvva, throwing aside his treaty, attacked the
British Residency at Poona. Sindhia was not able to
do much mischief, for he was still overawed at Gwaliar.
Bhonsla's contribution to the war was inconsiderable,
for at the very outset he was reduced to submission, and
was obliged to cede Berar. Holkar's troops were put
to flight at Mehidpur, 1817; the young Mulhar Rao
Holkar became a ward of the Company, and relin-
quished all claims in Rajputana. Baji Rao H, the
Peshvva, was driven from Poona, and defeated at Ashta, in
18 1 9. He then surrendered ; his entire dominions were
taken from him ; Satara and Kolharpur were restored
to descendants of Sivaji ; and he remained a state
prisoner at Cawnpur until his death. The war was
now over, and the Marathas had been finally crushed.
With the return of peace, Hastings was able to give
internal affairs his attention. He ex- „ . , ,
tended the subsidiary system of Welles- "al Melsure" "
ley, and knitted the various indepen-
dent states together by entering into alliances with
them, and the Briti.-h Government of India may be said
to have at this time received its character — an imperial
federation of friendly states clustering round one central
paramount power. Then, with respect to the courts of
ther^zad, the magistrates were required to perform the
duties of both judges and collectors of revenue. Hastings
192 HISTORY OF INDIA.
opened schools for the education of India, and he
gave freedom to the vernacular press. The result was
that five native journals began to be printed and pub-
lished. It is from this time that the moral and intellectual
advancement of the people of the country has been
recognised as a duty of the State, and their claim to
participate in the work of the British Government has
been held as an axiom.
Lord Amherst, 1823-1827.— Between the de-
parture of the Marquis of Hastings and
Wa? 1824-182? ^^^ arrival of Lord Amherst, there was
an interval of seven months, during
which Mr. Adam acted as Governor-General. As soon
as Amherst arrived he found himself drawn into a war
with Burma. For some years past the Burmese had
been disturbing the peace of Eastern India by making
destructive raids into British territory. Finding that
active measures were not taken against them, they be-
came more and more daring, and put a climax to their
insolence by claiming Chittagong, Dacca, and Murshida-
bad as being parts of their ancient kingdom. Finally
they seized and ill-treated British subjects, and it be-
came evident that nothing short of war would persuade
them to live at peace with their neighbours. Lord
Amherst accordingly made preparations for an expedi-
tion into Burma, and British troops were soon in
possession of Rangoon and Kemendine. But they
suffered a defeat at Ramu. This reverse, however, was
speedily compensated by the conquest, in 1825, of Assam,
Cachar, and Manipur, and by the occupation of Pegu,
Arrakan, and Tenasserim. Then came the fall of
Donabvu, and the capture of Prome. Finding his losses
thickening around him, the Burmese king thought it
time to make peace. So he ended the war in 1826 by
signing the Treaty of Yendabu by which he ceded
Assam, Arrakan and the coast of Tenasserim. ^.z also
undertook not to interfere with Manipur, Cachar, and
Ch. XII] GOVERNORS-GENERAL AFTER HASTINGS. 1 93
Jaintia ; to pay an indemnity of one crore of rupees ;
and to receive a British Resident at his capital.
When the Marathas were finally overthrown the
Raja of Bhartpur arranged with the
English that his infant son, Balwant Bhartpup?
Singh, should succeed him. But when Jany., 1827.
the Raja died in 1825, a cousin of the
child, Durjan Sal, usurped the throne. Lord Amherst
at first remonstrated with him ; but, as he remained
defiant, Lord Combermere was sent to dislodge him
from Bhartpur. The eyes of all India were turned with
the keenest interest to this stronghold, for it was con-
sidered impregnable — more especially as in 1805 Lord
Lake had failed to take it But it was now captured ;
Balwant Singh was set on its throne ; and English prestige
was restored. Lord Amherst improved the occasion by
going to Delhi, the ancient capital of the Mughals, and
there issuing a proclamation that the East India Com-
pany was the paramount power in India.
Lord William Bentinek, 1828-1835. — Bentinck
had formerly been Governor of Madras, Re^^^tion of
and so he had the advantage of some Batta, and the
knowledge of Indian affairs. The First Admission of
Burmese War had drained the Com- Jj'jfbnJseJ.yiee.^
pany's treasury, and Bentinck's express
orders from the Court of Directors were to cut down
expenditure and increase the revenue. He found two
directions in w^hich a saving might be effected— one in
the army and the other in the civil service. Hitherto
soldiers on active service had been given an extra allow-
ance called Batta, or more correctly Bhatta. For some
years past the Directors had objected to the pay-
ment of Batta, and so Bentinck reduced the amount
of the allowance, in spite of the discontent his order
created. Furthermore, every appointment in the higher
gradzc6»f the civil service had hitherto been reserved
for Englishmen. Bentinck felt that educated Indians
194 HISTORY OF INDIA.
would do the work efficiently and on much smaller
salaries. He, therefore, threw open various departments
of the public services to Indians. This measure, without
in the smallest degree lowering the efficiency of the civil
services, resulted in a great reduction of expenditure.
Then again in casting about for means whereby to
increase the revenues, Bentinck thought of the opium
traffic of Malvva. He accordingly made the manufacture
of opium a government monopoly, and there was an
immediate addition to the inci me of the Company.
Having by these measures restored the balance between
income and expenditure, he was free to work out certain
important social reforms.
Owing to the breaking up of such bands of men as
the Pindaris, and the lack of work for
of ^Thag-f °" those who had been in the various armies
of Indian chiefs, the country abounded
with men for whom a peaceful life had no charm. These
restless spirits gathered together in Central India, and
became the terror and curse of the land from Haidarabad
to Oudh, and from Bandelkhand to Rajputana. They
went by the name of Thags. Murder was part of
their creed, and plunder their sole occupation. They
wandered from place to place without anything to betray
who they were. They joined themselves to travellers,
gained their confidence, suddenly strangled them, and,
having robbed the corpses, buried them in the jungles.
With the help of Major Sleeman, Bentnick determined
to stamp them out. Within six years their bands were
broken up ; several thousands of them were captured ;
many of them were hanged, and more of them were
transported.
For centuries it had been the practice of a Hindu
widow to burn herself with her hus-
Suppression band's corpse. The English had always
InfanUei(&"^ revolted against such a cruel custom, and
Bentinck though t it ought to be pi-itdo wn.
Leaders of Hindu society, hke Dwarkanath Tagore and
Ch.XII] governors-general after HASTINGS. 195
Rammohan Roy, asserted that it was opposed to the
teachings and spirit of Hinduism. As a matter of fact it
had already been disallowed by the French, the Dutch,
and the Danes, in their Indian territories, and even in
Enghsh possessions where a firm hand ruled. Bentinck,
after much careful consideration, made a law by which
any one assisting at a Sati, as the practice of widow-
burning was called, or any one concealing a Sati, was
guilty in the sight of the law, and was liable to severe
punishment. He also forbade the murder of infant
daughters. In this humane work he received valuable
help from many distinguished English officers, including
Colonel John Sutherland, by whose influence with the
bigoted Rajput Chiefs these cruel practices were peace-
ably suppressed in Rajputana, where they had been
most prevalent.
On the eve of his retirement from the country Lord
Amherst had visited Simla which had
Simla and recently been acquired. In 1830 Ben-
arjee ing. tjnck purchased the remainder of the hill
from the Maharaja of Patiala, and made Simla the
summer residence of the Governor-General. Five years
later he bought Darjeeling from the Raja of Sikkim, and
thus he gave British India two of its most popular hill
stations.
Company's Pice of 1833.
In 1833 Parliament renewed the Charter of the
par,owoi*!.f tha East India Company for another twenty
ChS?S,1833 years. By the terms of the new Charter
196 HISTORY OF INDIA.
the Company retired from trade, and became a Govern-
ment pure and simple. The monopoly of the trade
of India had already been withdrawn (1813), and now
also trade with China was thrown open to all comers.
The administrative affairs of the Company were placed
under the control of Parliament, which guaranteed it
against all losses. The country has greatly benefited
by this Charter; for since its time the Government has
not been cramped by commercial considerations when
these have clashed with the interests of the people.
The welfare of Indian subjects, and not dividends
to shareholders, has become the only anxiety of our
rulers.
In every age and in every country, the language of the
rulers or the learned has been the official
th?^^0ffleia1^ language of the country. In the early
Language. Hindu period we have seen that this was
the case with Sanskrit ; and when the
English came in the time of the Mughals, they found that
Persian was the language of the courts of the country.
Though the British had become the paramount power
they had not altered the legal language ; but Bentinck
thought it time that Persian should give way to English.
Accordingly ini835 he made English the official language
of British India, and a knowledge of it a qualification for
admission into the public services. From 18 13 all teach-
ing in Indian schools had been through the vernacular
languages. But from this time English began to be
taught in the higher classes of schools ; and in a country,
such as ours, with its numerous creeds and tongues, the
introduction of a common language has done perhaps
even more than the railway and telegraph system to
bind the peoples of India and Great Britain into one
great brotherhood. Had Indians continued to be taught
only Sanskrit, and Persian, and Arabic, they could never
have taken a share in the Government of India as they
are doing to-day. "^ '
The time, however, had come for Bentinck to lay
Ch.XII] GOVERNOKS-GENEKAL after HASTINGS. 1 97
down his office. How grateful our country Retirement of
is to him may be read on the monument hfs"serviees'"o
which chiefly Hindu subscriptions raised India,
to him in Calcutta :— " Who never forgot
that the end of Government is the happiness of the
governed ; who abolished cruel rites ; who effaced
humiliating distinctions ; who gave liberty to the ex-
pression of public opinion ; whose constant study it
was to elevate the intellectual and moral character of
the natives committed to his charge."
Sir Charles Metcalfe, 1835-1836.— Pending the
arrival of Bentinck's successor, Sir
Charles Metcalfe took up the duties of {hefflan P^" ^^
Governor-General. He gave freedom ^^^^'
to the Indian Press ; that is to say, authors of books
and editors of newspapers were no longer required to
obtain permission to publish what they wrote. This
was a great gain ; for now every one could say what was
in his mind, and Government received much help from
what the public thought on matters of common interest.
Lord Auckland, 1836-1842 — When Lord Auckland
arrived it was feared that Russia had
designs upon India, and that the Tsar His Policy.
was therefore making friendly advances
to Dost Muhammad, the Amir of Afghanistan.
Desirous of gaining the alliance of the Amir, and so of
interposing a friendly power between Russia and India,
the Governor-General sent an ambassador to his Court.
But largely through mismanagement of the negotia-
tions, the embassy ended in the declaration of a war,
whose object was to dethrone Dost Muhammad and
to set upon the Kabul throne Shah Shuja, a descendant
of Ahmad Shah Durani. Shah Shuja was then an exile
under British protection in Ludhiana,
and as soon as the help of Ranjit Singh ^^^ Afghan
was secfi^ed, a large army was marched
198 HISTORY OF INDIA.
into Afghanistan, and Shah Shuja was proclaimed Amir
at Kandahar. But he was not acceptable to the
Afghans. The war had therefore to be carried further
into the heart of Afghanistan, and Kabul was taken.
Ranjit Singh died at this time, and the English troops
unassisted by the Sikhs, marched on Ghazni which fell
before them. Shah Shuja's rival, Dost Muhammad,
fled across the Balkan frontier ; but for all that he
did not give up fighting, for he had manv followers
who preferred him to Shah Shuja. It was not wise
to force a king on a people who did not want him ;
and the result was that for two years the English had
to hold Afghanistan by the presence of an army and of
a Resident — Sir William MacNaghten — at Kabul. But
in the hearts of the Afghans there still was war ; and
when, in 1840, Dost Muhammad reappeared with an
army, large numbers joined him. Eventually he sur-
rendered himself to the English, and was sent to India
(Nov. 1840) on a yearly pension. But the Atghans
were by no means overthrown. Suddenly they mur-
dered Sir Alexander Burnes, the Poli ical Agent. Dost
Muhammad's eldest son, Akbar Khan, invited Mac-
Naghten to a friendly meeting, and while saluting him,
treacherously murdered him (1841). General Sale too
was soon hard pressed, being indeed cooped up in Jalal-
abad. On all sides the enemv, led by Akbar Khan,
thickened, and the English officers at Kabul, to some
extent panic-stricken, were glad to accept any terms
offered them. The troops there, commanded by Major
Pottinger, were allowed to depart on condition that
they abandoned their guns and treasure ; that they paid
a heavy fine ; and that they gave four officers as hostages.
If they satisfied these demands they were promised a safe
retreat. It was the depth of winter. The country was a
net-work of mountnins. The British soldiers were ill
clad, and many of them perished in the severe cold. To
add to their sufifeiings the faithless enemv began to fire
upon them from the heights above. They had .fTo means
Ch.XII.] governor-general after HASTINGS. 199
of defending themselves, for they had given up their guns.
They were now (January, 18^2 ) in the Kurd Kabul Pass,
and their case was desperate. Akbar Khan made a
proposal. It was that the ladies in the English camp
should be placed under his care. There seemed no
alternative but to consent. So the women were com-
mitted to his protection. But the worst had yet to
come. On the following day, as the British were
marching, the enemy Fell on them in a narrow pass, and
cut them to pieces. Of the 16,500 who had started in
retreat from Kabul one solitary man. Dr. Brydon, reached
Jalalabad to tell the story of the sad fate of the Indian
army. Never had such a disaster overtaken British arms
in the East. The only bright spots in the surround-
ing gloom were Jalalabad, where General Sale was
making a brave defence, and Kandahar, where General
Nott was nobly holding out. The Home Government
blamed Lord Auckland for the course of the war, and
he was recalled.
Lord EllenboPOUg"h, 1842-1844, was sent to re-
trieve British honour. He despatched
General Pollock, who, taking AH Masjid, ^['j?co1.e!uded
pressed through the Khaibar Pass into
Aighanistan. The enemy retreated from Jalalabad, and
raised the siege of Kandahar. Shah Shuja was, how-
ever, at this time, murdered, and Akbar Khan assumed
the reins of government on behalf of his exiled father,
Dost Muhammad. Generals Pollock and Nott moved
from different directions against Kabul, destroying every
fortress in the line of their march, including the fortress
ofGhazni, whose Engli.-h garii^on had at an earlier
stage of the war been almost annihilated. Kabul was
then taken, and its bazar was blown up. The Afghans
were now in a mood for peace. It was clear to Ellen-
borough that Dost Muhammad was the only man who
could govern them, and as they wanted him to be their
king, he*vas released from his imprisonment in Calcutta,
200 HISTORY OF INDIA.
and reinstated on the throne of Afghanistan. The
British troops were then withdrawn, and the condition
of affairs before the war was restored, except that the
EngHsh had forfeited the friendship of the Afghans.
No sooner was the war with Afghanistan brought
to a close than Ellenborough had to turn
S^dh'^^lSs ^^ ^^^ attention to Sindh, whose rulers were
Baluchi Chiefs. Lord Minto, it will be
remembered, had made a friendly treaty with them ; but
the reverses which the British had experienced in
Afghanistan encouraged them to try to rid themselves
of their obligations to the Enghsh. They, therefore,
made an attack on the British Residency. Sir Charles
Napier conducted the war for Ellenborough, and signally
defeated the Amir of Sindh in the battles of Miani and
Haidarabad. The Chiefs of Sindh were sent as prisoners
to Benares, and Sindh itself was annexed.
Scarcely had the war with Sindh been concluded when
Ellenborough was called upon to interfere
Gwaliap taken jj^ ^^^ affairs of Gwaliar. A dispute be-
Proteetion. tween rival chiefs as to who should be
Regent to the young Sindhia, plunged
Gwaliar into civil war, and the danger was lest there
should be a general rising in Northern India. Ellen-
borough felt this must be averted ; and so he sent Lord
Gough with an army against the contending parties in
Gwahar. Gough won the battles of Maharajpur and
Panniar and thus put himself in a position to settle the
disputes which had involved the state in war. No
regent was appointed ; but a council of six Maratha
nobles was created to manage the affairs of the state,
and an English force was stationed in Gwaliar to ensure
the continuance of peace.
The Directors at home did not approve of the
annexation of Sindh, and Ellenborough was recalled.
However, to have restored the Company's prestige in
Afghanistan was an achievement with which he had
every reason to be satisfied.
Ch. Xir GOVERNORS-GENERAL AFTER HASTINGS. 20I
'J
Lord Hardingfe, 1844-1848.— However much they
may have wished it, it seemed impossible for the
English to abide in India at peace with their neighbours.
Scarcely was one war over than they found themselves
face to face with another. On arrival, Hardinge re-
cognised that a Sikh war was not very far off.
It will be remembered that in an earlier chapter
we traced the history of the Sikhs up to the time when
Dhulip Singh was placed on the throne, with the Khalsa
for his council and his mother as Regent. Well, the
Queen-Regent and the Khalsa were soon convinced that
they could not control the army, and
that, if it were not engaged against a fgJI^l^'^*^ ^^^'
foreign foe, it would turn upon the
Khalsa itself, and plunge the Punjab into civil war.
The army was accordingly, without provocation, led
across the Sutlej into English territory, and so began the
First Sikh War. Hardinge had, however, in anticipation
of the event, moved his forces unobserved towards the
Sikh frontier, and was therefore ready for the Sikhs.
He immediately proclaimed the Cis-Sutlej States an-
nexed, and within six days of the Sikhs crossing the
Sutlej, Sir Hugh Gough, the commander-in-chief, with
Lord Hardinge as second in command, defeated them
in the battle of Mudki. The English army in quick
succession added the victories of Ferozeshah (1845),
AHwal, and Sobraon (1846). The loss of life at
Sobraon was ghastly. The Sikhs were driven back
to a bridge over the Sutlej. The bridge gave away, and
thousands of them were precipitated into the river.
Hundreds perished ; but not a man surrendered. The
English then pushed on to Lahore, and a deputation of
Sikh chiefs, headed by Gulab Singh, sued for peace.
The Treaty of Lahore was then signed. By it, though
Dhulip Singh was retained on the throne with his
mother as Queen-Regent, the tract of country between
the B'2^ and the Sutlej was ceded to the English ; one-
and-a-hxlf crores of rupees were paid to them as an
202 HISTORY OF INDIA.
indemnity for the war ; Gulab Singh was set up as inde-
pendent Raja of Kashmir in return for 75 lakhs of rupees ;
and the strength of the Sikh army was reduced. In
addition Major Henry Lawrence was given a voice in
the Sikh Durbar, and was left at Lahore in charge of
political affairs. But Imamuddin, the governor of
Kashmir, refused to admit Gulab Singh's title to the
throne of Kashmir. Troops were sent against him, and
he was obliged to yield. A Second Treaty of Lahore
was then made. By it the Government of Lahore was
to be carried on on behalf of the minor Maharaja, Dhulip
Singh, by a council of native nobles under the direction
of a British Resident, while Gulab Singh became a
vassal of the British as well as Maharaja of Kashmir.
In 181 9 the Nawab Wazir of Oudh had thrown
over his vassalage to the Mughal Emperor, and had
assumed the title of King of Oudh. But his misrule
seemed to call for rebuke, and Hardinge
Misrule. Lord Wellesley s treaty with Saadat Ah
(made in 1801) and govern his kingdom
properly, the English would be obliged to interfere in the
interests of his subjects.
Before returning to England Hardinge attended to
other matters. He continued the ex-
Material ^ cavation of the Ganges Canal, and ear-
Progress, nestly endeavoured to put down sati,
infanticide, and human sacrifices among
the Khonds of Orissa. While he was Governor-General
the cultivation of tea was begun in Assam, the tax on salt
was reduced, education in English was systematically
encouraged, and Indians were more largely admitted
into the public services.
Lord Dalhousie, 1848-1856. — The administration
of Lord Dalhousie, one of the greatest
FeaWrel-ofDal- of=>'' '')<' Governors-General, «ay be
housie's Rule. summed up in the three ^^ords —
Ch. XII] GOVERNORS-GENERAL AFTER HASTINGS. 203
Acquisition, Consolidation, Development. He annexed,
perhaps, more territory than any of his predecessors.
He knitted together the scattered British provinces by
a net-v^ork of railways and telegraph wires. He did
much to increase the trade and the material prosperity
of the country.
Though overthrown in the First Sikh War, the
Sikhs were by no means crushed. The
several divisions of the Punjab had been wap,"l848-1849.
placed under Governors, or Diwans, who
were responsible to the British Resident at Lahore.
This officer called upon Diwan Mulraj, governor of
Multan, to render an account of his administration.
Mulraj preferred to resign. On this Mr. Vans Agnew
and Lieutenant Anderson were sent to take over the
government and fortress of Multan. But it had all been
arranged beforehand, and as soon as these officers as-
sumed control of public affairs they were murdered.
News of this reached Lieutenant Herbert Edwardes at
Dera-Fateh-Khan. But the rebellion of one man had
now grown into a revolt of the Sikh Confederacy. The
Afghans, smarting under their late humiliation, readily
lent their assistance to the Sikhs. Lord Gough did not
at first grasp the seriousness of the position, and he
omitted to make preparations on a sufficiently large
scale. However, Lieutenant Edwardes held the enemy
in check till Gough's army took the field. Multan was
then captured, 1848, and Mulraj gave himself up to the
English. In the following year the Sikhs were defeated
at Chillianwala and Gujarat. They then submitted
unconditionally at Rawal Pindi, (1849), and the Afghan
contingent was pursued to the Khaibar Pass. The war
over, Dhulip Singh was given a liberal pension ; the
Punjab was annexed, and put under a Board of Control
consisting of Henry Lawrence, John Lawrence, and
Charles Mansel. Moreover, the Sikh army was disband-
ed, b'lt^its best men were formed into a military police.
The Kh^alsa also was broken up, and its members reduced
204 HISTORY OF INDIA
to the position of private persons. Ruled by the Sikhs
the Punjab had groaned under the burden of forty-eight
taxes ; Dalhousie reduced them to six. A careful survey
was made of the province, and the land tax was fairly
levied. In other directions the development of the
province was assisted. The Bari Duab Canal was ex-
cavated ; the Grand Trunk Road was extended across
the Punjab ; and education was attended to by the state.
In 1852, the Board of Control at Lahore was dissolved,
and John Lawrence was made Chief Commissioner of the
Punjab. Grateful for the consideration shown them in
the hour of their humiliation, the Sikhs stood by the
English throughout the Mutiny of 1857.
The Raja of Sikkim, in 1849, seized some English
travellers. As a punishment Sikkim
Sikkim annexed. ^,^3 ^^^^^ ^^^^ ^-^
The King of Burma, in violation of the Treaty of
Yendabu ill-treated British subjects at
Second B^urmese Rangoon, and, when called upon to
' " redress the wrongs of Enghsh mer-
chants, he took no notice of the demand. Friendly
negotiations having had no effect, in 1852 an expedition
was sent against him, and in a short time Martaban,
Rangoon, Prome, and Pegu were taken from him.
Dalhousie stopped the war at this stage, being of opinion
that the Burmese King had been sufficiently punished.
A proclamation annexing all Lower Burma was pub-
lished, and the greater part of the English army was
withdrawn. From this time the southern part of Burma
has prospered.
According to a long established Indian practice,
dating from the time of Akbar and Aurangzeb, when
a Hindu prince held his principality in subordination
to, or as a gift from, the paramount power, in event
of failure of male heirs of his body, he was allowed
to adopt a son ; but the condition of this
of ^Lanse''^'^^ son's succession to the principality- was
that the adoption should have obtained
Ch.XII] governors-general after HASTINGS. 205
the consent of the paramount power. In the absence of
that consent, the personal property of the deceased prince
was inherited by the adopted son, but not the princi-
pahty, which reverted to the paramount State. At all
times the latter reserved to itself the right of withholding
its consent to an adoption, and, when the consent was
not given, of resuming the subordinate principalit)\
This is known as the Doctrine of Lapse.
Lord Dalhousie came out with instructions to
strictly follow the Doctrine of Lapse,
and, by resuming all petty states to Jexes^^many
which there were no heirs of the body, states,
to remove intermediate powers between
the British Government and the people, w^herever it
would benefit the latter. In carrying out this principle
Lord Dalhousie annexed several minor states. The Raja
of Satara on his deathbed adopted a son, 1848, without
the consent of the British Government. The child was
given his adoptive father's personal property, but not
the subordinate State of Satara, which was annexed.
The matter was referred to the Court of Directors, who
ruled that " the territory of Satara has lapsed, by failure
of heirs, to the Power who bestowed it, and we desire
that it be annexed to the British dominions." On simi-
lar grounds, Sambalpur, Jhansi, Udaipur, Tanjore, parts
of Sindh, Cachar, Orissa, and Nagpur were annexed, and
the pension of the Nawab of the Karnatic and of Nana
Sahib, the adopted son of Baji Rao II, lapsed, while
for arrears of payments due for the maintenance of
British troops quartered in his territories, the Nizam
of Haidarabad ceded the Assigned Districts to the
Company.
The annexation of Oudh was for different reasons.
The province of Oudh had been guaran-
teed to the Nawab Wazir, (from 1819 oSdhffsse!^
known as the King of Oudh) by Welles-
ley's ^reaty of 180 1, only so long as he ruled Oudh well.
Bentinck, Auckland and Hardinge had each in turn
206
HISTORY OF INDIA.
warned the King of Oudh, that if he did not reform his
government, the Company would be obliged to interfere.
Dalhousie felt that action could no longer be delayed.
Things had come to such a pass that he wrote to the
Court of Directors, "were it not for the constant presence
of British troops at Lucknow, the people of Oudh
would speedily work their own deliverance." He re-
commended that " while the king should be permitted
to retain his royal title and rank, he should be required
BRITISH INDIA
IN THE TIME OF LORD DALHOUSIE
1856.
•^•i&At
Ch. XII] GOVERNORS-GENERAL AFTER HASTINGS. 20/
to vest the whole civil and military administration of
Oudh in the hands of the Company." The Court of
Directors did not approve of his leniency, and ordered
him, before he laid down office, to annex Oudh. It was
accordingly annexed in 1856.
It was Dalhousie's great anxiety that a change of
masters should not injure the subjects.
He everywhere set the rents and the ad- KviSfels^^^^^"
ministration ofjusticeonaproperfooting,
but he nowhere interfered with the customs, religions
and habits of the people. These last continued in the
full enjoyment of their rights, and in addition were freed
from the oppression which they had only too often ex-
perienced from native rulers. District Officers were
appointed to preside over the law courts, over the
gathering-in of revenue, and over the police. Most of
the newly-acquired territories were made into Non-
Regulation Provinces.
Having completed his work of acquisition, Dalhousie
began to consolidate. He united the
scattered parts of the British possessions Consolidation
u -I ju4^u^i u ^ and Material
by railways and by the telegraph system. Progress.
He introduced cheap postage, and con-
structed roads, canals, court-houses, jails, and other pubhc
buildings. Education was made a department of the
state, and government officers were appointed to look
after the primary and secondary schools that sprang up
everywhere. Lord Halifax, in 1854, drew up a scheme
of education based upon the modern vernacular lan-
guages of India, and its adoption eventually led to the
founding of Universities at Calcutta, Madras, and
Bombay. Trade and industries were encouraged in
every possible way. Slavery was abolished, and agri-
culture was promoted. Appointments in the Civil Service
were thrown open to the natives of India, and Indian
members were admitted to the Legislative Council.
Dalhousie tried to reorganise the native army, and to
increases the number of Enghsh regiments in the
208 HISTORY OF INDIA.
country ; but the Directors did not consent to his
proposals.
In 1856, Dalhousie retired from his arduous duties.
He had greatly increased the British
hoSs^Work possessions in India. Where there had
been misrule and tyranny he substituted
good government and equal laws. By the iron bands
of railway lines and telegraph wires he linked province
to province. By a system of cheap postage he facili-
tated the interchange of thought. By providing roads
and canals he assisted trade. By introducing a common
system of state education he created a oneness between
divergent creeds and races. By allowing Indians into
every department and grade of the Civil Service he
satisfied the ambitions of all classes of people. These
statesmanlike measures rank him with Hastings, Clive,
Wellesley, and Bentinck, and entitle him to a foremost
place among the Governors-General of India.
Lord Canning". 1856-1858. — Owing to Dalhousie's
measures, when Canning arrived there was in the minds
of Hindus and Muhammadans, a suspicion that the
British Government was determined by indirect means
to subvert the religions of the country, and that national
customs were in danger of being undermined. In ad-
dition to this, the application of the
Causes of the Doctrine of Lapse had greatly alarmed
of?857^"^^"^ ^^® chiefs and princes, many of whom
believed themselves to have been un-
justly deprived of their lawful inheritance. There was
also a vague expectation in the air because of the pro-
phecy that the hundredth vear after the battle of Plassey
would see the end of British rule in India. The sepoys
knew that the)^ outnumbered the European soldiers in
the ratio of five to one, and that miles of country in-
tervened between one English garrison and another.
The army, too, had been denuded of its British jgfficers,
many of whom had been given civil and ^ political
Ch.XII] governors-general after HASTINGS. 209
appointments. More than this ; the recent Burmese War
had greatly irritated the sepoys, for they held that they
had enlisted exclusively for internal warfare, and not
for service beyond the seas — crossing the seas being
believed to be forbidden by the Hindu religion. Again,
many regiments were composed of men who came from
the same locality, who were related to one another, who
were of the same caste, and who could therefore easily
combine for any purpose. The annexation of Oudh
had sent adrift 50,000 Indian soldiers who had commit-
ted no fault. All this combined to fill the sepoys with
discontent. They were thus ripening for mischief when
the rumour was spread that the British Government
was conspiring to rob them of their caste by greasing
the cartridges of the guns with fats that offended
Muhammadans and Hindus ahke, and that the flour
supplied to the Hindu sepoys at Cawnpur was mixed
with bone dust of the sacred cow.
While these grievances were rankling in the minds
of the sepoys, their officers and the civil
authorities suspected nothing. Before Jjny begins
leaving the country. Lord Dalhousie
had advised the Home Government to increase the num-
ber of British soldiers in the Indian army, so that they
might in an emergency hold the sepoys in check. But
his advice had not been heeded. It is true that at more
than one place the sepoys had been somewhat insubor-
dinate ; but no serious view had been taken of their
conduct, and they had been leniently treated. And
yet there were events transpiring which should have
put the English on their guard. At Meerut a religious
mendicant publicly preached rebellion, and Dandu Pant,
the adopted son of the ex-Peshwa, and better known
in history as Nana Sahib, made a tour of Delhi, Luck-
now and Kalpi, sowing the seeds of insurrection as he
went. And so it was that the British dreams of security
were rudely brought to an end one Sunday evening by
the sepoys of Meerut shooting down their officers ;
210 HISTORY OF INDIA.
killing every European man, woman, and child they
met ; breaking into the jail and releasing the prisoners ;
and spending the night in plundering the city. Before
the news of the rising could be sent anywhere, the
insurgents hurried on to Delhi, and being there joined
by the sepoys of that city, they murdered the Euro-
peans of the place. It was very evident that their next
move would be to take possession of the arms and
ammunition stored there by the English. But Lieu-
tenant Willoughby was determined that the powder
and shot should not fall into their hands. To defend
the arsenal against them was out of the question, so he
set fire to the powder, and was blown up together with
2000 of the rebels. Delhi, however, was in their posses-
sion, and the mutiny rapidly spread from province to pro-
vince, and from city to city. Rohilkhand was ablaze,.
Jalandhar, Bandelkhand, and Jabalpur were in rebellion.
The Rani of Jhansi behaved with savage ferocity. In
what is now the United Provinces of Agra and Oudh the
people themselves joined the sepoys. Lucknow was
besieged, and Cawnpur was at the mercy of Nana Sahib
and his general, Tantia Topi. Though the South
Maratha Country sympathised with the sepoys, its
soldiery remained inactive. Through the influence of
Sir Salar Jang, Haidarabad remained peaceful. At
Peshawar, Barrackpore, and some other places the sepoys
were disarmed before they could rebel. The Sikhs,
who might have been expected to join the insurgents,,
held aloof, and the Punjab remained loyal.
Delhi, Lucknow, and Cawnpur were the main centres
of the Mutiny. At the last- mentioned
Cawnp^u"r!'"Delhl ^^^y some 400 English soldiers en-
and Lucknow. trenched themselves with their wives
and children, and for a time bravely
withstood the fierce assaults of Nana Sahib and Tantia
Topi. When they felt they could no longer hold out,,
in despair they accepted the offer which Nana^Sahib
made them of safe conduct to Allahabad. They were.:
Ch.XII] governors-general after HASTINGS. 211
led to the ghat were boats were in readiness for them.
But as they pushed into midstream the treacherous
enemy from the banks of the river opened fire on the
defenceless boats. About 206 men, women, and children
were made prisoners, and killed with every conceivable
form of cruelty. Their corpses were thrown promis-
cuously into a well. Two days after this tragic occur-
rence, Havelock arrived with a relieving army, and
Nana Sahib fled. What became of him is not exactly
known, but it was at the time believed that in the
forests of Nepal he was devoured by a tiger. At any
rate he was never heard of again.
Meanwhile at Delhi, the 30,000 rebel sepoys in
possession of the city were being besieged by only 7000
British troops under General Nicholson. At length
Delhi fell, but not till Nicholson had been killed. The
Emperor, Bahadur Shah, and his two sons were made
prisoners. He was transported to Burma, and the ring-
leaders of the mutinous sepoys at Delhi were shot.
The fall of Delhi was a turning point in the history of
the Mutiny.
As has already been observed, in Oudh the mutineers
were joined by the people. They were misled into
rebellion by the Talukdars, who had become disaffected
owing to the annexation of the province. At Lucknow,
Sir Henry Lawrence had fortified the Residency, and in
it about 1700 Europeans were besieged by the rebels
who were being daily reinforced. Early in the siege
Lawrence was killed; but the beleaguered British bravely
held out. After three months a relieving force under
Havelock, Neill, and Outram arrived. But the invest-
ment of the Residency continued. Neill fell. In an
underground chamber the ladies and children dwelt for
the six dreary and anxious months that the siege con-
tinued. The Residency yet stands, and its grey walls
riddled by bullet and cannon ball, bear silent but
impressive witness to the furyof the mutineers, At last,
in No\'ember, 1857, Sir Colin Campbell cut his way
212
HISTORY OF INDIA.
through the enemy, and reheved the all but exhausted
garrison. The sepoys fell back on Bareilly, but were
expelled from there, and were pursued from place to
place till they escaped to Nepal.
Sir Hugh Rose was meanwhile dealing with the
Mutiny in Central India. He took Kalpi, and laid siege
to Jhansi, whose cruel Rani had eagerly combined with
Tantia Topi. The Maharaja of Gvvahar, who had thrown
in his lot with the English, was defeated by this Maratha
general, who forthwith assumed the government of the
place. Sir Hugh Rose, however, defeated him at Morar,
and retook Gwaliar. Sir Robert (afterwards Lord)
Napier came 'upon the rebel army under Tantia Topi
between Gwaliar and Agra, and all but annihilated his
forces. Tantia Topi escaped from the battlefield, but
he was later on betrayed, and hanged for his share in
the massacre at Cawnpore. It was now April of 1859,
and the Mutiny was practically stamped out.
The Residency, Lucknow
Ch. XII] GOVERNOR-GENERAL AFTER HASTINGS 213
Lord Canning dealt leniently with the mutineers,
most of whom he believed had been mis-
guided into rebellion. A general pardon J^jjjf' ^y *^he
was proclaimed to all who threw them- British Crown.
selves on the mercy of the English. The
lands of the disloyal Talukdars were confiscated, and
the ringleaders were put to death. These mild measures
displeased many, and earned for the Governor-General
the nick-name of" Clemency Canning" ; but in truth the
epithet is a tribute to his wisdom and humanity. His
mercy did more than anything else to pacify the country,
and to make it the loyal India of to-day. In 1858, an
Act was passed by Parliament abolishing the East India
Company and the Board of Control and transferring the
government of India to the British Crown in the person
of Queen Victoria. The Governor-General was created
Viceroy, and was made responsible to the Secretary of
State for India, who was put at the head of a Council ap-
pointed to manage Indian affairs. On the ist November,
1858, Queen Victoria's Proclamation was read with due
ceremonial splendour at every civil and military station.
It guaranteed to the people fair and equitable treatment ;
it assured the nobility that all treaties and engagements
made with them in the past would be respected ; the
Doctrine of Lapse was declared to be abandoned, and
adoption in the event of failure of natural heirs was
admitted to confer on the adopted the right of succession
to the guddee. The Public Services were without
reserve thrown open to any natives of India who, by
their education, ability and integrity, might be capable
of performing duties that had hitherto largely been
discharged by Europeans.
"I;
CHAPTER XIII.
India under the Crown:
The Fifth, or British, Empire of India.
The Viceroys of India.
i8s8—igoi A.D.
LORD Canning", 1858-1862.— The Queen's Procla-
mation made India a dependency of England, and
Canning was created Viceroy. As soon
as Vieeroy^*'^^ ^^ peace was restored, he travelled
over Northern India, and reassured the
princes and people whose cities he visited. At Agra he
held an assembly, or durbar, of Indian chiefs who had
been loyal during the Mutiny, and rewarded them with
titles and decorations. His next anxiety was to recoup
the vast sums which the rebellion had cost. An income
tax was imposed, customs duties were revised, and pro-
fessions were required to pay a license. Then, in 1859,
a Rent Act was passed in the interests of ryots, and in
the following year the Indian Penal Code, which Lord
Macaulay had drawn up, was used in all Criminal
Courts. The Sadar Courts were abolished, and the
High Court of Calcutta was established.
Lord Elg-in, I. 1862-1863.— Lord Elgin, who had
been Governor of Canada, in America, was appointed
to succeed Canning. During his short rule of eighteen
months he had to put down a rising of the Wahabis,
a fanatical sect of Muhammadans. While touring in
North-West of India, he became seriously ill, and
died at Dharamsala. There he was buried. Until the
next Viceroy could come out, Sir William Denisun, the
Ch. XIII.] THE VICEROYS OF INDIA. 215
Governor of Madras, acted at the head of the Indian
Government. It looked as though fresh trouble was
at hand, for the Raja of Bhutan raided the Duars, and
treated with scorn the ambassador who was sent to
remonstrate with him.
Lord Lawrence, 1864-1869.— Sir John Lawrence,
who had so ably ruled in the Punjab during the Mutiny,
was selected to be the next Viceroy, and was created
Lord Lawrence. He was very averse to wars, and
though he might have found reason for entering upon
hostilities with Afghanistan, he desisted. It was, how-
ever, otherwise in the case of Bhutan, The conduct of
the Raja of that land could not be tolerated, and an
expedition was sent against him. After a brief but
brave resistance he was overthrown, and the Bhutan
Duars were annexed, 1864. Two years later a terrible
famine occurred in Orissa, and in spite of all that was
done to supply its people with grain, thousands died of
starvation.
Lord Mayo. "The Conciliator of Princes," 1869-
1872. — As already hinted, Sher Ali the new Amir of
Afghanistan, had had a misunderstanding with Lord
Lawrence, and Mayo thought of restoring friendly feel-
ings by inviting him to a meeting at Ambala. Sher Ali
came, and was treated with special honour ; but he went
back dissatisfied. The Viceroy then turned his attention
to internal reforms and improvements. For some years
past the income of the Government had fallen short,
chiefly because the Local Governments made no attempts
to save expenditure that could well be avoided. The
reason of their extravagance was that any savings they
might effect lapsed to the Government
of India. To remedy this Mayo devised l^^J^^Tsy^^^
what is known as the Provincial Con-
tract S,ystem, according to which a certain portion of
the rev\2nues and of other incomes is allotted to the
2l6 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Provincial Governments for five years at a time. From
this allotment they have to meet their expenses, and if
there be any balance left, they may use it for the
benefit of the province concerned. This system with
unimportant modifications continues to this day, and
by it the money affairs of the Government have caused
httle, if any, anxiety.
Mayo next remodelled the Supreme Council. He
divided the affairs of the Government into
the^Sup?SSe s^^^" Departments— Foreign ; Pubhc
Council. Works ; Home ; Revenue ; Agriculture,
Commerce ; Financial ; Mihtary ; and
Legislative. The Head of each Department was \given
a seat on the Supreme Council of which the Viceroy
himself was President. Every member was responsible
for his own Department, but he had the benefit of the
advice of the other members assembled in Council. By
this means the various parts of the machinery of the
Government were made interdependent, and assisted to
work together in harmony.
In the Queen's Proclamation of 1858 it was declar-
ed that the government of the several
tife^^Feudatopy Ponces and chiefs who then governed
States. their own territories should be perpetu-
ated, and that the dignity of their houses
should be maintained. Lord Mayo recognised that this
meant that an area of about 600,000 square miles, with
a population of nearly 50 millions, governed by Feuda-
tory Chiefs was part and parcel of the British Indian
Empire, and that the Queen had made herself responsible
for its welfare. He therefore laid down the following
maxims for future deahngs with Feudatory Chiefs : — (i)
The misrule of an Indian Chief was never to be made
the excuse for annexation. (2) Where there was bad
government the Chief might be replaced by his heir,
whose government — if he were a minor — should be
placed under a Native or an European Regeijiit. (3)
The vounger Native Chiefs should be educated under
Ch. XIIL] the viceroys of india. 217
the direction of British officers, and be taught their res-
ponsibihties to their subjects and to the British Govern-
ment. In working out this poHcy Mayo took in hand
the 187 Chiefs of Kathiawar, estabhshed a cohege for
them, and gradually introduced among them a better
system of Government. So also the state of Aliwar
was placed under a Native Council of Management.
It did not take long for the Feudatory Princes to ap-
preciate the work that Lord Mayo was doing for them,
and the genuine grief that filled them when they heard
of his assassination by a felon on the Andaman Islands,
was only one proof out of many that in his death they
felt they had lost a true friend.
To avoid friction between England and Russia on
account of Afghanistan, Lord Mayo by
skilfully conducted negotiations had the Afghanfstan ^^
Amir's boundaries fixed. defined.
The Viceroy now devoted himself to the extension
of railways, and to the improvement
of the means whereby, m times of f^i^SXekt^on.^^''
deficient ramfall, water might be sup-
plied to the districts where there was drought. To
afford education to the masses was his wish, and he so
improved the Department of Public Instruction that he
studded Bengal with primary schools in which all classes
of society were taught Reading, Writing and Arithmetic.
Knowing how the people of this country yield an affec-
tionate loyalty to the person of their ruler, he arranged
for a visit to India by his Royal High-
ness the Duke of Edinburgh, the second Visit of the
son of Queen Victoria. The tour of the Edinbupg-h
Duke touched the hearts of the Queen's
Indian subjects, and put a seal to the peace that pre-
vailed in our land.
Lord Mayo was a man who wanted to see things
for himself. Early in 1872 he started on
a tour, to Burma, the Andaman Islands, Assas^nated
and OriSsa. But he did not get further
R
2l8 HISTORY OF INDIA.
than the Andamans ; for as he was leaving the shores of
Viper and Ross Islands, one of the convicts — whose
condition in exile he had gon& to ameliorate — stabbed
him ; and all India went into mourning for one of her
most sympathetic and noble-hearted Viceroys.
Lord NoPthbPOok, 1 872-1876.— The year after North-
brook's arrival he was called upon to combat a severe
famine that prevailed in Northern Bengal and Bihar.
Relief works were opened, grain was imported from
Burma, and every effort was made to save life. In 1875
our Emperor, Edward VII., then Prince of Wales, paid
India a visit. People of all classes combined to give
him a royal welcome. Before retiring in the following
year Lord Northbrook set Indian finances on a firm basis.
Lord Lytton. 1876-1880. — In 1877 Queen Victoria
assumed the title of Empress of India,"^and at a great
durbar held at Delhi, Lord Ly tton pubhshed to all Indians
that they were ruled over by their own sovereign. At
the same time the Proclamation of 1858 was confirmed,
and the bond between England and India was thereby
more closely drawn.
Southern and Northern India, excepting Bengal and
Assam, was at this time visited by a
Famine of 1877. famine, and though Government spent
a crore and ten lakhs of rupees in
affording relief, hunger and disease claimed a large
number of victims.
Ever since the time of Lord Lawrence the relations
between Sher Ali, Amir of Afghanistan,
Af|han°War. ^^^ "^^^ English had been strained. For
military purposes Ouetta had lately been
occupied as an outpost. To this the Amir objected,
and regarded it as a menace to his kingdom. He accord-
ingly entered into negotiations with Russia, and received
the Czar's ambassador with marked honour at.,Kabul
As a matter of political necessity Lord Lytton^sent an
Ch. XIIL] THE VICEROYS OF INDIA. 219
English envoy to Sher Ali, but the Amir refused to
receive the British ambassador. This could not be
tolerated, and war was declared. An English army
marched into Afghanistan, and before the close of 1878
Jallalabad and Kandahar were in the possession of
the English, and Sher Ali fled to Balk. Here he
died ; and in the following year his son, Yakub Khan,
sued for peace, and the Treaty of Gandamak was signed.
He agreed to receive a British Resident at Kabul, and
was in turn acknowledged as Amir.
But the presence of a British Resident at the capital
of their country was distasteful to the Afghans, and
suddenly the soldiers of the Amir attacked Sir Louis
Cavagnari, who was Resident, and his
attendants, and killed him and them. The Thipd
This act of treachery necessitated a re- jg'^-^I ^^'
newal of war, and Sir Frederick (now
Lord) Roberts marched on Kabul, and took it. At the
same time Sir Donald Stewart won a decisive battle at
Ahmad Khel, and Yakub Khan was brought down to
Calcutta as a prisoner. This incensed the Afghans, and
the whole country rose up in arms. At this time a
change occurred in the Ministry in England, and Lord
Lytton resigned the Viceroyalty. Lord Ripon took
up the office thus vacated, and continued the war which
he had inherited from his predecessor in office.
Lord Ripon, " The Conciliator of the People, '
1880-1884 — Shortly after Lord Ripon's „, . ,
arrival he received the unwelcome wapeontinuS!
news that the English army had been
defeated at Mai wand by Ayub Khan, a brother of the
captive Amir. General Roberts, however, saved the
position by marching from Kabul to Kandahar, and by com-
pletely routing Ayub's army. Abdur Rahman, a nephew
of Sher Ali, was then placed on the Afghan throne, and
the wai' having ended, the English troops were withdrawn.
Lord Ripon felt that the time had come when
220 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Indian municipalities might be given a
The Local Self- larger share in the guidance of local
Government Aet^^^.^^ In 1882 he, therefore, passed
the Local Self-Government Act. By
this means he developed the municipal constitution
which had gradually been growing up since India passed
to the Crown. He conferred larger powers of local
administration to rural and urban Boards, and the elective
principle received a wider application. Since then pub-
he opinion has gained more and more weight, and the
extended hberty which was at this time given to the'
Indian press has allowed of the free discussion of mat-
ters connected with the public welfare. As Representa-
tive Government and Education go hand in hand, Lord
Ripon improved the quality of the education imparted in
Indian schools. In all matters he showed himself to be
in deep sympathy with the ambitions and aspirations of
the Queen's Indian subjects, and when he retired in 1884
his departure was much regretted.
Lord Dufferin, 1884- 1888. -Of late years Russia
had been so extending her territory
The Boundary ^^i^^ she had now come to the confines
Commission. ^^ Afghanistan Indeed there was a
likelihood of her taking Herat itself Such a measure
would of necessity produce complications which had
better be avoided. Lord Dufferin with masterly dip-
lomacy secured the appointment of a Commission of
English and Russian officers who defined the boundaries
of Afghanistan. At the same time several border tribes
came under the friendly control of the British. The
hands of the Indian Government were at this time
strengthened by the offer of troops by the Feudatory
and other chiefs in event of a war with Russia. To
mark its appreciation of the loyalty of the native states,
the Government sanctioned the maintenance of an Im-
perial Service Contingent in the more important-.Feuda-
tory States.
Ch.XIII.] the viceroys of india. 221
For some years past affairs in Upper Burma had
been going from bad to worse. King
The Third Buf- Thebaw recked little of treaties and
mese War 1885. jggg Qf „qq^ government. He permitted
British traders to be molested, and bands
of robbers to infest the land. Not content with what
they could plunder in Burma itself, these made mcur-
sions even into British territory. The Viceroy appealed
to Thebaw to set matters right, but he insolently threat-
ened to invade British India himself. General Prender-
gast was sent with an army against him. Mandalay,
the capital of Upper Burma, was taken without a blow :
Thebaw was deposed ; his kingdom annexed, 1886 ; and
the entire country of Burma was constituted a Chief
Commissionership. Since 1897 it has been ruled by
a Lieutenant-Governor, and is now in a prosperous
condition.
Lord Lansdowne, 1888-1894.— The new Viceroy
completed the defence of the Afghan frontier, and as-
sisted the Feudatory Chiefs in organising the Imperial
Service Corps to defend that frontier. In Manipur there
was an unimportant rebellion which was easily sup-
pressed. The Imperial and Provincial Legislative
Councils were enlarged, and the elective system for
the return of certain members to those councils was
introduced.
Lord Elg-in II., 1894-1899.— A disturbance in
Chitral, on the Afghan side of the north-west frontier,
led to an expedition, which resulted in the English
occupying that distant outpost. The bubonic plague
now broke out in India, and in spite of all that science
and sanitation can do to check its spread from cities
to rural tracts, it still prevails. In 1897 a severe famine
occurred in the Central Provinces, Bihar, and the United
Provinces of Agra and Oudh. Public generosity and
relief 'Vorks saved many lives that must otherwise
222 HISTORY OF INDIA.
have been lost. But the misfortunes of Lord Elgin's
incumbency were not yet ended. An earthquake
of considerable violence visited North-Eastern India
and caused great loss of property, and damaged
many public works and railways. In the same year
the fierce tribesmen of Tirah, towards Afghanistan,
raided British territory, and the Tirah campaign was
undertaken to restore order. In this it succeeded.
Lord Curzon, 1899-1905.— The first pubHc duty
that Lord Curzon was called upon to perform was to
organise relief for one of the severest famines that have
ever visited India. The unity of the British Empire all
the world over was illustrated in a remarkable manner,
by the large sums of money that were sent from every
part of that empire for the supply of food to the millions
who were starving in an area of 400,000 square miles.
The famine was severest in the Central Provinces, the
Berars, Northern Deccan, Gujarat, Rajputana and
Mysore. At one time 3^ million people were on relief,
and six million pounds was expended in the charitable
work of feeding the hungry. In 1 901, Queen Victoria
died, and in January, 1903, Edward VII was formally pro-
claimed Emperor of India at a splendid durbar at Delhi.
With the exception of the expedition to Tibet, the
whole of Lord Curzon's administration was taken up
with internal measures. Here-adjusted the distribution
of British India, by creating the North-West Frontier
Province, and by adding parts of the Bengal Presidency
to Assam to form the new Province of Eastern Bengal
and Assam. Educational affairs occupied much o his
attention. He remodelled the lines upon which primary
and secondary schools had been conducted, revived in-
struction in the vernaculars, and revised the constitution
and methods of the Indian Universities. He improved
the prospects of the Police Service, and minimised the
danger of corruption among its servants and the oppres-
sion by them of the pubhc. He established a f /epart-
Ch. XIII.] THE VICEROYS OF INDIA. 223
ment of Commercial Intelligence. He extended railways,
and in every direction gave an impetus to the fuller
development of the natural resources of the country.
He visited Persia, and made a new treaty with the Amir
of Afghanistan. To counteract the influence which
Russia had begun secretly to exert in Tibet, a Commer-
cial Expedition was made into that land. By these
dealings with our neighbours on the frontier he secured
the protection of India against foreign designs. As a
result of continued financial prosperity he reduced the
Salt and Income Taxes. Important changes were made
in army affairs, and these led to his resignation, in 1905.
He was succeeded by Lord Minto II., who is now the
head of the Indian Government.
%
CHAPTER XIV.
fndia, Past and Present.
Material, Intellectual and Moral Progress.
IN addressing the vast concourse of Indian nobles and
potentates assembled at the Dehli Durbar, speaking
of the people of India, Lord Curzon said : — " To the
majority of these millions the King's Government has
given freedom from invasion and anarchy ; to others it
has guaranteed their rights and privileges ; to others it
opens ever-widening avenues of honourable employ-
ment ; to the masses it dispenses mercy in the hour of
suffering; and to all it endeavours to give equal justice,
immunity from oppression, and the blessings of en-
lightenment and peace. To have won such a dominion
is a great achievement ; to hold it by fair and righteous
dealings is greater ; to weld it by wise statesmanship
into a single and compact whole will be, and is, the
greatest."
It is difficult for us in these days of security to realise
what an invasion from Persia, Afghani-
stan, or Central Asia meant. It signified invasion,
not merely a host of 20,000 to 100,000
foreign soldiers "on the march, paying for nothing, and
eating every town, and cottage, and farmyard, burning
and slaughtering on the smallest provocation and often
in mere sport. It usually also meant a grand final sack
and massacre at the capital of the invaded country. "
For instance, when Nadir Shah invested Delhi, in a
single forenoon 8000 men, women, and children were
sabred, and the city was pillaged, and set on fire in
several places. Within a few years of the departure
of Nadir Shah, Ahmad Shah made no less th^p five
inroads into India, and his troops for a series of ' weeks
Ch. XIV.] INDIA PAST AND PRESENT. 225
made Delhi the scene of every atrocity. His Afghan
cavalry meanwhile scoured the country, slaying, burn-
ing and mutilating, in the smallest village as in the
largest town. His horsemen suddenly swooped down
upon the sacred city of Muttra while it was thronged
with thousands of peaceful pilgrims who had swarmed
to it for a holy festival. Before the devotees could es-
cape, they were burnt within their houses, or massacred
in the streets, or carried away into captivity. Such was
the condition of Upper India not 150 years ago. Nor
did other parts of the country fare any better. Fierce
aboriginal tribes, like the Koch and Ahoms, from time
to time devastated Assam. Warlike neighbours like the
Burmese overran Eastern Bengal and laid it waste.
Southern Bengal, as also the Coromandal and Malabar
Coasts, fell an easy prey to pirates, who sailed up the
large rivers, burned peaceful villages, and put to the
sword inoffensive peasants. All this is now changed.
The mountain passes of the Himalayas are no longer
an open door to enemies in the north ; the eastern tribes,
as well as the Burmese, are subject to British rule ; and
pirac}' is a thing of the past.
Great as was the suffering caused by the unprovoked
incursions of foreigners, greater was the
ArfaiSiv ^^°™ misery produced by internal wars. It
is said that Muhammad Shah, Sultan of
Gulburga once had a quarrel with the Raja of Vijaya-
nagar, and that he did not sheath his sword till 50,000
of his enemy's subjects had been killed. The Marathas
gave the country no rest. "Every region which was
not subject to their rule was wasted by their incursions.
Wherever their kettledrums were heard, the peasant
threw his bag of rice on his shoulder, hid his small
savings in his girdle, and fled with his wife and children
to the mountains or the jungles, to the milder neigh-
bourhood of the hyena and the tiger." Nor were the
Pindaris less of a scourge to the land. Chitu led an
undiscij)lined army of 25,000 ruffians into the Nizam's
22(> HISTORY OF INDIA.
territories, and there they burned, destroyed and slaugh-
tered as far south as the Krishna. They then entered
the Northern Circars, and not a town or village escaped
the horrors of their cruel greed. Then, too, the death
of a Mughal Emperor was the signal for a civil war in
which neither side showed any mercy. Of the twenty
princes who succeeded Aurangzeb, fourteen met violent
deaths ; four were blinded, and two died in prison. The
tale of miser}' was completed by the depredations of
the Pathans, the thags, and the dacoits. How many
deaths, and how much misery they were responsible for
will never be known. Very different is it now. The
Marathas, Pindaris, Pathans, and other avowed enemies
of peace no longer fill the land with bloodshed. War
between two Indian princes can no longer be resorted to,
and struggles for vacant thrones do not occur. The
domination of the English has brought to an end civil
discord and anarchy.
It is the natural right and privilege of every man
to call his life and properly his own.
But this was precisely what no one could Their Rights and.
do a little over a century ago. In those anteed^t? aU ^^"
days one's life might be taken at any
moment, and of all investments landed property was
the least secure. The usual price of a field was the
crop standing on it. And even at that price it was often
dear, for before it could be reaped, down would come
a swarm of Marathas or Pindaris, sla}' the owner, and
carry off his ripened corn. People were glad to escape
with their hves, and leave their homes and belongings
to the enemy. Owing to the frequency of invasions,
the borderland between Afghanistan and India was a
silent waste. Along the foot of the Himalayas a belt
of land, measuring 30,000 square miles was delivered
over to wild beasts. Vast tracts of country in Assam
and Bengal had no inhabitants. By the sea coast and
in the deltas of the larger rivers many thousand ^square
miles were depopulated by the ravages of 'pirates.
Ch. XIV.] INDIA PAST AND PRESENT. 22^
Owing to the general insecurity no one had the heart
to grow more than what would suffice for actual needs.
No industries flourished, and trade there was none.
People feared to come together and form towns or large
villages. They preferred to live in small and scattered
groups so that they might not attract the attention of
a greedy foe. It is very ditferent now. The once barren
wildernesses of the Himalayan borderland smile with
fields of grain, and tea-plantations dot the slopes of the
mountams themselves. Waste lands and swamps are
being everywhere reclaimed, and land is now the safest
of all investments. It is difficult to buy a field for
even twenty crops. Though parts of the country are
overcrowded, people do not at all seem willing to try
their fortunes in uncultivated tracts. They prefer to
live in their native towns or villages, being as averse to
leaving their homesteads as they were formerly afraid
to inhabit them. Hence populous towns and villages
have sprung up in abundance, and the great problem
of the day is to raise from the fields enough for the
wants of so many milhons.
Their rights and privileges have been guaranteed
not to the masses only, but also to the princes and
native rulers in the land. The unsettled condition of
the country in former days involved the smaller princes
and rulers in ruin, for their wealth, supposed or real,
made them the prey successively of Mughal, Maratha
and Pindari. Repeatedly it was their fate to ransom
their lives by paying all that they possessed. Their
estates were often confiscated for no just reason, or they
were thrown into prison and their lands given to another.
But since Queen Victoria, in 1858, abandoned the Doc-
trine of Lapse, and Lord Mayo made it law that on no
account was an Indian chief to have his territories
annexed, the native rulers of the country have enjoyed
security to a degree formerly unknown by them. They
show their gratitude by their loyalty and devotion to
the Ci^wn. Some of them maintain Imperial Service
22S HISTORY OF INDIA.
Troops with which to help the British Government in
time of necessity, and Lord Curzon created a career for
princes by estabhshing a Cadet Corps for the sons of
Indian chieftains.
(a) Agriculture, Trades and Industries. — Security of
hfe and property is the foundation upon
which the British have built their J? ^pg^iel!^"^^
Government of India. The remarkable
development of agriculture during the last hundred years
is only a result of continued peace and security. Rulers
and people alike have a permanent interest in their
possessions ; population has increased ; and commerce
and trade have become possible. Waste lands have been
brought under the plough, and the poorest man endea-
vours to obtain the best return from his fields, for he
knows that what he does not require for his own use he
can readily sell in the market. In large towns and
populous cities mills and factories give the labouring
classes an industrial career. British capital has opened
out tea and coffee plantations, paper, cotton and jute
mills, oil and coal mmes, indigo and opium factories, not
to mention potteries, rope works, quarries and other lines
of business which provide work for millions. In 1907,
sugar was raised on 2,348,800 acres of land, and the yield
amounted to 2,223,400 tons. In the same year there
were 533,300 acres under tea, which produced 240,849,900
Hbs of tea, and gave employment to over 500,000 coolies.
Cotton plantations in the same year covered 22,344,000
acres, and produced 4,908,000 bales, of 5 maunds each,
of which Rs. 21,966,000 worth was exported during the
year, the balance beingmanufactured into cloth in 2 1 7 local
cotton mills, where 211,100 persons found daily employ-
ment. Jute was in the same year grown on 3,883,200
acres, and yielded 9,600,000 bales, and provided 167,000
persons with work. In 1907, there were 307 coal mines
in which on the average 128,666 labourers were daily
employed, and which yielded 9,783,200 tons of coal.
Ch. XIV.] INDIA, PAST AND PRESENT. 229
It is not necessary to give details of every trade and
industry, but some idea may be formed of the enormous
proportions to which commerce has grown when in
1907 Calcutta alone had a trade valued at i2oi crores.
In 1 906- 1 907, the imports of all India were valued at
Rs. 1,717,359,670, and its exports at Rs. 3,519,824,950.
Thus in that year the commerce of India with other
lands yielded her a profit of Rs. 1,802,465,280.
(b) The Post and Telegraph Departments.— The
expansion of trade and commerce has necessitated rapid
means of communication, and cheap modes of carrying
goods. In 1837, the Postal Department was established.
Before that date there was no general system of postal
service in India. Government had its own arrangements
for the conveyance of state letters and parcels, and
private persons were, as a matter of favour, allowed to
use the Government Service. In the absence of railways
and steamers, letters were carried b)^ country-boats,
dak-garies, horses, camels, and runners. There were no
postage stamps, and the charge from Calcutta to Bombay
was one rupee per tola Now a letter can be sent to
England for one anna, and a post card to Bombay costs
only one pice. The total length of mail lines is now
about 153,600 miles, and more than 78,000,000 letters,
newspapers, and parcels are carried by the post in a
year. The operations of the Post Office include the
making or the realising of payments ; the banking of
savings ; the distribution of quinine : and the insurance
of letters and parcels. Fifty years ago there was some
uncertainty as to whether, at the end of several weeks,
a letter would reach its destination ; now we post our
letters confident that in a day or two they will be cor-
rectly delivered. In the year 1907, the sum of Rs.
147,500,000 was held in favour of depositors in the
Post Ofifice Savings Bank.
Intimately associated with the Postal Service is the
Telegraph Department. We owe its introduction to
230 HISTORY OF INDIA.
Dr. O'Shaughnessy, a Professor of the Medical College
in Calcutta. He first experimented in telegraphy at
the Botanical Gardens on the opposite side of the Hugh,
and in 185 1 he worked an experimental line of 82 miles
with such success that Lord Dalhousie connected Calcutta,
Agra, Bombay,Peshawar and Madras with telegraph wires.
In 1855, private messages began to be received for trans-
mission. Now some 67,000 miles of telegraph wires inter-
sect the land, and a message can be flashed from Cape
Comorin to Peshawar in a few minutes for a fee of six
annas only. In 1907, over 14 million messages travelled
by wire. The benefits of the telegraph system are in-
estimable, and the service it rendered during the Mutiny
of 1857 has established its political importance.
(c) TheExpansionof Commerce.— The Postal De-
partment could not do its work without railw^ays, nor
could commerce be carried on in its present proportions
wnthout trains. In former times the journey from Cal-
cutta to Bhagalpur occupied two months by boat ; now
the distance is covered in less than fifteen hours by
train. Travelling has become not only rapid but easy.
The wayfarer of a hundred years ago had to risk en-
counters with wild beasts and bands of desperate rob-
bers. The difficulties of the way were increased b)^
bad roads, or famine-stricken districts, or swollen rivers.
Railways have altered these conditions, and have made
journeying safe and cheap. Merchandise of all kinds
is now carried great distances at very moderate rates.
The first railway, 20 miles in length, w^as opened in 1853
between Bombay and Thana. The next year the East
Indian Railway conveyed passengers from Howrah to
Pandua, a distance of ^8 miles. In 1856 the Madras
Railway ran to Arcot, 65 miles. At J3resent India is
covered w'ith a network of railways measuring 30,000
miles, and in 1907 no less than 300 million passengers
travelled in trains, and 69 milhon tons of goods/. w^ere
carried. Over three million people are employed in
Ch. XIV.] INDIA, PAST AND PRESENT. 23I
working railways, and so, many thousands, who might
otherwise be in want, are enabled to provide themselves
with food.
(d) Inland Roads and Canals, - Railways have open-
ed up the country to trade. In former times the cost of
carrying grain, etc., to markets was so great, that traffic
in local produce was impossible. Now all that a trader
has to do is to buy his grain in the villages and convey
it to the nearest railway station. This has encouraged
husbandmen to grow in their fields more than they
require, so that they may sell the surplus, and with the
money thus obtained procure for themselves some of
the necessaries and comforts of life. Railways have,
therefore, called into existence innumerable roads and
their feeders. Before the British Government was estab-
lished, there was not a single good road in the country.
But from the time that Bentinck began the Grand Trunk
Road from Calcutta to Delhi, Local Governments,
District Boards and Municipalities have been so busy in
making roads that it is comparatively easy to carry the
produce of distant fields to the railway. Where roads
do not exist, canals supply a water-way upon which
boats and steamers carry country produce to trading
centres.
(e) Emig"ration. — Mention has already been made of
the great increase there is in population, and it has been
observed that one of the most difficult problems ot the
day is to feed the millions of India. It is calculated
that there is an increase of 20,000,000 souls in every
ten years. The growing population may be provided
for by waste lands and sw^amps being converted into
fields ; bv agricutrural methods being improved so that
the same area of fields may produce grain more abun-
dantly ; and by the excess of population emigrating to
less thickly inhabited parts of the country. The re-
clamation of land proceeds slowly. The people are too
232 HISTORY OF INDIA.
conservative to improve their modes of cultivation ;
and emigration affords only a partial solution of the diffi-
culty. Some progress, however, has been made in all
these directions. The waste lands along the base of the
Himalayas have been reclaimed for the plough : but still
107,525,236 acres in British India await cultivation.
In all schools the elements of agricultural knowledge
are being taught, particularly in rural tracts, and it is
hoped that more information on the subject may lead
to improved husbandry. Emigration proceeds upon a
small scale to Assam, and to such places as Mauritius,
Demerara, and Trinidad. In 1900, there were 69,841
emigrants to Assam, and about 100,000 emigrants to the
colonies, and elsewhere. But most emigrants return to
their native homes after a term of years, and emigration
therefore does not in any great degree afford relief to
congested areas.
(/) Education. — Peace is conducive to the spread of
learning. Under no Indian dynasty was the education
of subjects regarded as a duty of the state. Whatever
learning there was, it was confined to the Brahmins,
who cultivated Sanskrit, and to the Mullahs, who made
a study of Arabic. Education for the masses neverexisted.
In 1 78 1, Warren Hastings established the Calcutta Ma-
drasah, and in 1813, when the charter of the East India
Company was renewed, a clause was inserted requiring
not less than a lakh of rupees to be spent every year in
the diffusion of knowledge. When Bentinck ruled,
education in English was for the first time generally
imparted, and in 1857 the Universities of Calcutta,
Madras and Bombay were founded. In later years uni-
versities have been added at Allahabad and Lahore.
Lord Mayo and Lord Ripon extended education to the
masses, and in 1902, we had in British India 3,184,000
pupils in 92,000 primary schools; 259,412 pupils in 5,032
secondary schools ; and 17,148 students (including 177
girls) in 180 colleges. The expense to Governmt^nt for
Ch. XIV.] INDIA, PAST AND PRESENT 233
education amounted, in 1902, to about no lakhs of rupees,
which amount was required to supplement the fees of
pupils and the subscriptions of persons interested in the
spread of education. The Universities are meanwhile
preparing men for a share in the service of Government
and for practising the learned professions.
C^) Religfious Toleration — Every one is entitled to
his own religious views and convictions. In former days
this was not admitted by the rulers of the land, and
there existed odious taxes such as the jiziya and taxes on
pilgrims. Hindu persecuted Muhammadan, and Mu-
hammadan persecuted Hindu. But now the British
Government allows every man to follow his own religion
without let or hindrance. Missionaries preach Christ-
ianity, just as Muhammadans, or Buddhists, or Brahmos
endeavour to spread their respective faiths. In the
eyes of British law all religions are equal, and no man's
religion or caste is considered a disqualification for service
under Government.
{h) Police. — The Police is maintained for the preser-
vation of peace and for the suppression of crime. The
policemen of the Mughal Empire were an undisciplined,
half-starved soldiery, who lived upon what they could
extort from the people. Now the policeman receives a
monthly salary, and is kept under strict discipline. His
duties are to check and trace crime, to aid the meting
out of justice, and to report breaches of law. For
protection against robbery and murder each person pays
the Government a monthly Police Tax of less than i pice.
We now have court houses, and jails, and thanas. In
the time of the Mughais "the prisons themselves were
ruinous hovels, whose inmates had to be kept in stocks
and fetters, or were held down under flat bamboos, not
on account of their crimes, but because, from the in-
security of the jails, the jailer had no other means of
preveiUing their escape." Compare with this the treat-
234 HISTORY OF INDIA
ment of prisoners in our modern jails. Thelt and crimes
against the person have sensibly diminished, and although
the Police is capable of improvement, through its organi-
zation there is now less crime in India than in many-
other lands.
(i) The Dispensing- of Justice with an even hand.—
The Mughals had no system for their law courts. Judges
were not salaried, nor were they watched and corrected
by superior courts. They were often merely sellers of
decisions, and earned their living by accepting payment
alike from plaintiff and defendant. They were guided
by no impartial codes of criminal or civil laws, nor was
any adequate opportunity of defence given to the accused.
We now have our lower and our higher courts, so that
an appeal from a subordinate magistrate lies to his superior.
The law makes no distinction between rich and poor.
There is the same law for all. The powers of magis-
trates are restricted according to their rank, and every
one charged with crime is allowed to defend himself by
employing advocates learned in the law. Judges and
magistrates are paid suitable and sufficient salaries, and
they are upright and just.
(/) Social, Relig-ious and Political Prog-ress.— Social
life in India is inseparable form religious rites and obser-
vances. While the manners and customs of a nation
may undergo changes, its religious teaching permits of
little, if any, modification. Under such circumstances
religion inevitably acts as a check upon the introduction
of innovations in national customs and practices. In
India, if this were not the case, it is certain that the so-
cial advancement of its people would have kept pace
with the material development of the country. And
yet unmistakably the feeling is yearly gaining ground
that the time has come for the old order of things to
give way to the requirements of new surroundings. The
study of Western literature has familiarized the .people
Ch. XIV.] INDIA, PAST AND PRESENT 235
with new modes of thought and with new standards of
Hfe ; commerce with other countries has brought into
their homes commodities formerly unknown ; and con-
tact with Europeans has enlarged their outlook. The
rigid exclusiveness of a century ago has disappeared, and
in schools pupils of all castes and creeds sit side by side
and receive the same instruction. Passengers of all grades
of society crowd together into the trains. Members of
formerly despised classes fill offices of trust and honour
in the State. Under the stress of circumstances the old
barriers that separated the people into unsympathetic
groups are being gradually removed. The lower orders
have risen in the social scale, and though caste distinctions
continue, much toleration is evinced. Then, too, at
the conclusion of its sessions the National Congress is
accustomed to resolve itself into a Social Conference
for the discussion of such subjects as the remarriage of
child widows, the education of women, and the propriety
of crossing the seas. Briefly, the general tendency is in
favour of allowing persons greater freedom in the details
of every day life.
In Religion there has been of necessity but little to
call for remark. The British Government of India is
neutral in religious matters, and allows its subjects the
fullest freedom in the exercise of their Faiths. Where,
however, the claims of humanity have demanded it, the
Government has intervened, and tJia^i, sati, infanticide,
human sacrifices, and hook-swinging have been sup-
pressed. There is now a spirit of inquiry abroad, and
people diligently study their Sacred Books in perference
to accepting as final the dogmatic teaching of others.
Newspapers and journals discuss questions of religion,
and missionary attempts are being made to prevent
people from fallingaway from theirancientcreeds. A reli-
gious movement somewhat analogous to the Protestant
Reformation of the sixteenth century has taken place, and
the Sadharan Brahmo Somaj and the Adi BrahmoSomaj
have is^ed as theistic rehabilitations of Hinduism.
236 HISTORY OF INDIA
It is, however, in the sphere of Politics that the
greatest progress has been made. Apart from the share
that State servants of all grades have in the administra-
tion of the land, non-officials also participate in the
conduct of public affairs. By the creation of Municipal
Towns and of District Boards, self-government has in
some measure been introduced. A certain number of
seats on the Provincial Legislative Councils is reserved
for non-official Indians who are returned by the votes
of constituents. Moreover, as occasion arises, the Viceroy
appoints Indians as additional Members of his Council.
All Bills are published before they are finally made law,
and newspapers and public bodies have an opportunity
of criticising the measures which Government has in
contemplation. The Indian National Congress assem-
bles annually to ventilate the aspirations and the desires
of the people, and political work is diligently carried on
throughout the year by influential bodies, such, for
example, as the British Indian Association and the
Muhammadan Literary Society of Calcutta.
The Mughals were as much foreign rulers of India
as are the British. With the solitary ex-
Avenues of ceptionofAkbar, no Mughal emperor ad-
§^"r.^!!5^^i^^ milted the Hindus or the Muhammadans
Employment, ^ ^, ■ , ^ ^ ■ ,
or the country mto the higher services
of the State. The English, however, have been more wise
and liberal. They have from the earliest time of their
occupation of this land employed native labour. At
first Indians were given only subordinate posts, but now
there is nothing to exclude them from the best appoint-
ments.
However, clerkships and Government appointments
happily are not the ambition of all. Many prefer to enter
the learned professions, and be physicians, surgeons, law-
yers, civil engineers, electricians, and journalists. In pre-
English times these avenues of honourable remunera-
tive employment did not exist. Then, too, tli^ere are
many other openings for men of education and influence.
Ch. XIV.] INDIA, PAST AND PRESENT 237
They may as Honorary Magistrates, Municipal Commis-
sioners, and members of District Boards, assist the
Government in its scheme of Local Self-Government.
We have so far been considering those who have
the blessing: of health and are able
to ™rk. What about those that are R^<,f 's«fl.*!
arilicted with sickness and bodily infirmi- ing.
ties ? For such people in bygone days
there was no provision made by the ruling dynasty. But
now we have hospitals and many charitable institutions.
In 1906 there were 2,411 hospitals, which treated 405,000
in-patients and 25,000,000 out-patients. Zenana hospi-
tals are provided in several towns, and medical relief is
thus carried to women whose social restrictions prevent
their appearing in public. Besides hospitals for general
complaints, there are lunatic and leper asylums, cholera
hospitals, plague hospitals, small-pox hospitals, alms
houses, homes for the aged, and orphanages for the father-
less. They are maintained or aided by the Government
at a great expense, and they succour individuals who
are in distress. There are, however, occasions when, not
isolated individuals only, but a whole population is plung-
ed into a sea of suffering. Too much or too little rain
brings on a famine, and millions, who from 5'ear to year
depend entirely upon the season's crop of paddy, are
doomed to starvation. In every country there is a
percentage of the population that goes through life on
insufficient food. In India out of 300 millions, 40 millions
are believed to have but one meal a day. During a
famine they have to go without even that meal. Fa-
mines have occurred in India for centuries. One is said
to have begun in Maharastra in 1396, and to have lasted
twelve years. In 1556, another prevailed in the Mughal
districts east of Delhi. The sumptuous Court of Akbar
did nothing to feed the hungry. In 1770, a worse
famine visited Bengal, and Warren Hastings spent the
sum of Rs. 90,000 in relieving the helpless inhabitants.
ThereWere no roads, and no means of promptly distri-
238 HISTORY OF INDIA
buting rice to the famine-stricken. Obviously Rs.90,000
was nothing in comparison to the money that should
have been spent ; but Hastings' action marked a great
change. It publicly accepted for the Government the
responsibility of rescuing people from the pitiless cruelty
of famine. His successors have inherited that responsi-
bility, and in the famine of 1874, ^ ^^^'^ ^^ 4^ million
rupees was spent in feeding the ryots. In the famine
of 1897, Rs. 53,256,080 were expended, and on an
average 2,778,000 suiferers were daily provided with
food. The loss of life was comparatively small.
But Government is not idle in years of plenty.
It does not wait till calamity has overtaken its subjects.
It does all it can to prevent disaster. Against plague
and cholera, sanitation is insisted on ; against the rav-
ages of small-pox vaccination is made compulsory ; to
combat fevers quinine is dispensed through post offices ;
against famines from drought, canals, wells, and tanks
are excavated ; and against famines from floods, embank-
ments are raised along rivers that are liable to overflow.
To provide food at such times a Famine Fund is main-
tained. There are over 14,000 miles of canals, which
have been made at a cost of 37 crores of rupees, and
which with their distributaries, aggregating 40,000 miles
in length, are able to irrigate more than 15,000,000 acres
of land.
The preceding pages have endeavoured briefly to
justify the statements quoted in the
Rernarks"^ opening paragraph of this chapter.
It is not pretended that the condition
of India admits of no improvement, or that the admini-
stration of the country has reached a state of perfec-
tion. But it is claimed that the English have done more
for the good of India than any of her earlier rulers, and
that the Government earnestly endeavours to promote
the real well-being of its subjects. It would be unreason-
able to expect no weakness or defect in the administra-
tion of so vast a country with its diverse races and" their
Ch. XIV.] INDIA, PAST AND PRESENT 239
conflicting interests. But of any government the highest
praise is, that it seeks to do what is right. This may
without hesitation be said of the Government of India,
for the representatives of our King Emperor strenuously
endeavour after Truth, Justice, and Unity, believing
that ''to have won such a dominion is a great achieve-
ment ; to hold it by fair and righteous dealings is greater;
to weld it by wise statesmanship into a single and com-
pact whole will be, and is, the greatest."
%
GENERAL INDEX.
Note. — Capital Letters indicate names of persons ; Italics,
Sanskrit and Oriental Tertns.
A.
Abdulla Sayyid, 123, 129.
Ardur Rahaman, Amir of
Afglianistan, 219.
Aborigines, the, 1-3, 13, 14, 15,
Aborigines, civilized, 2.
Aborigines, savage, i.
Abul Fazl, Allami, 113.
Adam, John, 192.
Adams, Major Thomas, 164.
Aclil Shahi Kingdom, 102, 119,
120.
Adisura, see Aditya Sen.
Aditya Sen, 68.
Afghan War, first, 198.
Afghan War, second, 218.
Afghan War, third, 219.
Afghanistan, 7, 157.
Afghanistan, definition of bound-
aries of, 217, 220.
Afghans, 93, 203.
Afzal Khan, 127, 128.
Agamas (traditions), 37.
Agnew, Patrick Alexander
Vans, 203.
Agni (fire), II.
Agnimitra, 42, 43.
Agra, adornment of, by Shah
Jahan, 1 16.
Agra, capture of, 183.
Agra, Durbar at, 214.
Agricukure, 228.
Ahalya Bai, Maharani, 132.
Ahmad Shah Abdalt, invasion
of India by, 125, 131, 224.
Ahmad Shah Abdali, struggle
of the Sikhs with, 141.
Ahmad Shah Durani, 197.
Ahmadnagar, capture of strong-
hold of, III.
Ahmed Khel, battle of, 219.
Ahoms, 4, 225.
Aix-la-Chapelle, peace of, 154.
Ajatasatru, 23.
AJivika (a sect of Jaina) monks,
29.
Ajmir, 71, 92.
Ajmir, sack of, 184.
Akbar, 110, 204.
,, birth of, 108.
,, coin of, 1 13.
,, conquests of, iio-iii.
,, death of, 1 11.
,, gold medal of, commem-
orating the fall of
Asirgarh, 1 11.
,, military system and ad-
ministration of, III.
,, reign of, no, et seq.
,, revenue system of, 113.
,, social reforms of, 114.
Akbar, son of Aurangzeb, 121.
Akbar ii., 125.
Akbar Khan, 198, 199.
Akbar Namah (Abul Fazl), 113.
Alamgir I, see Aurangzeb.
Alamgir II, 125.
Alauddin Ghori, known as
Jahansoz, 92.
GENERAL INDEX.
Alauddin Muhammad i, 95,
et seq.
Alberuni, 89, 91.
ALBuauERauE, Alfonso d', 146.
Alexander, 24, 51.
,, Indian silver coin
of, 25. ^
Alexander, invasion of India
by, 23.
Alfred, 145, 147.
Ali Masjid, 199.
Ali Verdi Khan, death of, 160.
Alivval, battle of, 201.
Aliwar, Native council of man-
agement in state of, 217.
Alliances, system of subsidiary,
185.
Almeida, Francisco d', 146.
Altamash, 94, 106.
,, Tanka of the emperor,
106.
Alvares, Pedro, 146.
Amboyna, massacre of the Eng-
lish at, 147.
Amherst, William Pitt, First
Earl rf, 192.
Amir Khan, 188, 190, 191.
Amir Khusrau, 106.
Amoghavarsha, 78.
Ananda Bai, 133.
Ananda Pal, 86.
Ananga Pal, 72.
Anarchy, freedom from, 225.
Andamans, 2,217.
Anderson, Lieut., 203.
Andhra dynasty, members of
the, 50.
Andhra, revolt of, 44.
A?idhra-bhritvas, 49.
Andhras, Kingdom of the, 48.
Antiochus 'Iheos, 29.
Anwar-ud-din, 153.
death of, 155.
Arab conquest, 85.
Arabic literature, 91.
Arabs, 76, 90, 92.
Aramaean script, 39.
Aranyaka, the, 20.
Architecture, 53, 54, 116.
Arcot, capture of, 155, 156.
Argaon, battle of, 183.
Arithmetic, 39.
Aror, 85.
Arsaces Theos, 45.
Arts, 53.
Aryan civilisation, 10.
Aryan dispersion, map of the,
viii.
Aryan immigrants, conflict of
the earlier and later, 14.
Aryans, the, in the Punjab, 7.
Aryans, the, in their original
home, 5.
Aryans, conflict of the, with the
Dravidians, 7.
Aryans, first immigration of the,
Aryans, second immigration of
the, 13.
Arya-varna (friend's colour), 8.
AsAF Khan, 114.
Asaf-ud-Daulah, 169.
Astadliyayi, the (Panini), 36.
Asirgarh, capture of fort of. III.
AsoKA, inscription on the column
at Rummin Dei, 31.
Asoka's column, 26.
,, ,, view of, 28.
Asoka's " Edicts," 27, 36, 40^
48. ^
Asoka's reign, 27.
Asrama, institution of, 19.
Assam, conquest of, 19.
Assaye, battle of, 183.
Astronomy, 37, 38.
Asvaghosa, 51.
As%'amedlia (horse-sacrifice), 43.
Atala Mosque, 100, 106.
Atliarva veda, 13, 19.
Auckland, George Eden, Earl
of, 197, 199-
Aurangzeb or Alamgib i, 204.
,, character anW policy
of, 121.
GENERAL INDEX.
AuRANGZEB, Contrast of, with
Akbar, 122.
AuRANGZEB, death of, 120.
,, enthronement of, 117.
,, grant of Sutanati to
the English by, 120.
AuRANGZEB, Moghu! Empire in
the time of, 1 18.
AuKANGZEB, reign of, iig.
,, re-imposition of taxes
on Hindu pilgriiTis by, 121.
Aurangzeb's coin, 122.
,, war with the Mara-
thas in the Deccan, iig.
Austrian Succession, War of
the, 153.
Ayodhya, 15.
Ayub Khan, 219.
AzEs, 43.
B.
Babar, 99, 107, 108.
Badauni, 113.
Baffin, 148.
Bahadur Shah, ioi, 123, 140,
211.
Bahman Shah, ioi.
Bahmani Kingdom, 102.
Bahman Shahis, 86.
Baillie, Lieut. -Col. WiUiam,
171.
Bairam Khan, 109, no.
Baji Rao I., Second Peshwa,
125, 130.
Baji Rao II., Seventh Pesh-wa,
134, 1S2, 183, 190, 191.
Balaji Baji Rao, Third Pesh-
wa, 125, 130, 131.
Balaji V'ishwanath, First
Peshwa, 129, 132.
Bale AN, 94, 95.
Ballala TI., 79.
Balwant Singh, 193.
Bana, 65.
Bandelkijand Kingdom, 70, 72,
87, 92-94, 104.
Bangalore, storming of, 178.
Bargis, 135.
Bari Duab Canal, excavation of,
204.
Barid-Shahi Kingdom, 102.
Barlow, Sir George, 184, 186.
Barwell, Richard, 160,
Bassein, Treaty of, 131, 134, 182.
Batta (Bhatta), reduction of,
19.3-
Begums of Oudh, 169, 173, 175.
Benares, Treaty of, 168.
Bengal, Kingdom of, 70, 75, 92,
93, 97, IOI.
Bentinck, Lord William Cav-
endish, 193-197.
Bentinck, monument to, 197.
Berar, 102.
Bernier, Francois, 117.
Bhagwan Das, 113.
Bhandi, 61.
Bharatas, 14.
Bharatvarsha, 14.
Bharavi, 65.
Bharhut, 54.
Bhartpur, capture of, 193.
Bhartrihari, 65.
Bhatarka, 76.
Bhattikavya (Bhartrihari), 65.
Bhavabhuti, 69, 90.
Bheels or Bhils, 2.
Bhillama, 79.
Bhima Deva, 86.
Bhima Pala, 87.
Bhoja I., 70, 75.
Bhoja II., 70.
Bhoja Deva, 90.
Bhonsla, 132.
Bhutan Duars, annexation of,
215.
Bidar, 102, 119.
Biderra, batde of, 163.
Bihar, Kingdom of, 73, 93.
Bijapur, 102, 116.
Bimbisara, 23.
Birbal, 113.
BiSAL Deo, see Vigraharaja.
GENERAL INDEX.
Black Hole, massacre of the, 1 6i.
BosCAWEN, Admiral the Hon.
Edward, 154.
Boundary Commission, 220.
BraJima, 20.
Brahmagupta, 65.
Bralmian dynasty, 85.
Brahman Shahi dynasty,
founding of, 86.
Brahmana (theological work),
19-
Brahmanic civilisation, 14, 17.
Brahmanic doctrine of trans-
migration, 21.
Brahmanic laws, 38.
Brahmanic literature, 19,36, 64.
Brahmanic monks, 29, 33.
Brahmanic philosophy, 52.
Brahmanic religion, 20, 62, 63.
Brahmanic schools, 36-39, 52.
Brahmanism, new, 62-64, 88,89.
Brahmanism,old,i7,37,4o,5i,52.
Brahmanism, revival of, 62, 63,
89.
Brahmanism, state of, during
Buddhist period, 52.
Brahmanists, rival monastic
orders among, 89.
Brahmans, 10, 17-19, 29, 37, 50,
51, 63-65, 85.
Brahmasiitra bhashya (Sankara
Ach arya), 90.
Brahmavarta. 10.
Brahmi script, 39.
Brahmo Samaj, 235.
Brass token, 98.
Brihadratha, 29.
Brihat Sam hit a (Varaha
Mihira), 65.
British India in Dalhousie's
time, 206.
Brydon, Siirgeon-Major
William, 199.
Buddha (enlightenedone), doct-
rine of, 34.
,, Kanishka'sgoldcoinof, 46.
,, life of, 31.
Buddha, relics of, inscribed
casket of, 39.
,, under the tree, 32.
Buddha Charita (Asvaghosha),
Buddhism, introduction of, in
Ceylon, 28.
Buddhism, new, 50.
,, old, 28,29,35,41,46,50,53-
,, propagation of, 29, 51.
,, rise of, 29.
Buddhist Council, 51.
,, literature, 41, 64.
,, monks, 30, 31.
BUHLOL LoDI, 99, 100.
Bundelkhand, Mahmud's cam-
paign against, 87.
Burmese War, first, 192.
,, ,, second, 204.
,, ,, third, 221.
BuRNES, Sir Alexander, 198.
BussY, see Bussy-Castelnau.
Bussy-Castelnau, Charles
Joseph Patissier, Marquis de,
172.
Buxar, battle of, 164.
c.
Cabot, John, 147.
Cabral, 146.
Cadet Corps, establishment of,
228.
Calcutta, early history of,
120, 160.
Calcutta Madrasah, 232.
Cami'BELL, Sir CoWn, 211.
Canals, Roads and, 27, 202, 217,
231.
Canning, Charles John, Earl,
208-213.
,, work of, as Viceroy, 214.
Caron, Francis, 149.
Cartier, John, 167
Caste, 8, 17, 18 ,38. C'
Caste-system, origin of, 17.
GENERAL INDEX.
Cavagnari, Sir Louis, 2ig.
Cawnpore massacre, 211.
Central India, state of, 186, 194.
Ceylon, 2, 15, 22, 52.
Ceylon, introduction of Budd-
hism in, 28.
Chach, 85.
Chait Sing, Raja of Benares,
169, 173.
Chaitanya, 105.
Chaityas (temples), 54.
Chakrayudha, 69, 70, 75.
Chalukya dynasty. Eastern, 81.
,, ,, Western, 78.
Chalukyas, 61, 76-79.
Chalukyas, later Western,
known as Chalukyas of
Kalyani, 79.
Chama Raj, 166.
ChAND BlBI, III.
Chand (Chanda) Sahib, 155,
159-
Chandels, of Mahaba, 72.
Chandernagore, capture of, 161.
Chandra Deva, 71.
Chandragiri, 102.
Chandra Gupta, 26, 27, 29, 37.
,, ,, and his Lichhavi
queen, gold coin of, 56,
Chandra Gupta I., 57, 64.
Chandra Gupta II., 48, 56, 57.
Charaka, 53.
Charnock, Job, 160.
Charter, renewal of East India
Company's, 195.
Chasthana, 47.
Chant, 120, 130, 139.
,, exaction of, by Marathas,
125-
Chedi (Kalachuri) era, 50.
Chedi Kingdom, the, 77, 183.
Chillianwala, battle of, 203.
Chingis Khan, 95.
Chinsura, taking of, by Lord
Clive^ 147.
Chitral disturbance, 13, 221.
Chitu, 188.
Chohans of Ajmirand Delhi, the,
71, 92.
Chola Kingdom, the, Bi.
,, ,, revival of Hinduism
in, 105.
Cholas, 22, 23, 78, 82, 83.
Christian Settlement, first, in
India, 54.
Christianity, 147.
Civil Service, 236.
Civil Service Code, publication
of, 179.
Civil Service, reforms in, 179.
Classes, origin of, 8, 17.
Classical Sanskrit literature,
commencement of, 64.
Clive, Robert, Lord, 147, 155,
156, 158.
Clive, first period, 159.
,, second period, 160.
,, third period, 165.
Code of Manu, 52.
Coins :
Akbar's coin, 1 13.
Akbar's Gold Medal com-
memoratingfall of Asirgarh,
III.
Aurangzeb's coin, 122.
Brass token of Muhammad
II., 98.
Coin of Jahangir and Nur
Jahan, 1 14.
Coin of Vishnu Vardhana, 59.
Deccan coin of Chandra
Gupta and his Lichhavi
queen, 56.
Gold coin of Gangeya Deva,
Gold Sikandar as-Sani coin
of Muhammad I., 96.
Indian coin of Mahmud, 88.
Kanishka's gold coin of
Buddha, 46.
Silver Coin of Alexander, 25.
Tanka of Emperor Altamsh,
106.
Collectors of Revenue, 167.
GENERAL INDEX.
CoMBERMERE^ Field-Mai'slial
Stapleton Cotton, First Vis-
count, 193.
Coni»ientary on the Vedas
(Sayana), 105.
Company's monopoly, 187.
Commerce, expansion of, 230.
Commercial Intelligence Depart-
ment, establishment of, 223.
Condition of the people, io-i2,
16-19. 37. 38. 50-52, 62-64,
88-90.
CoNTi, Nicolo, 103.
Contract System, provincial,
215.
Convention of Wargaon, 170.
Convocation of Prayaga, 63.
CooTE, Lieut. -Gen. Sir Eyre,
156, 162, 171.
Copper-plates, recording grants
of land on, 63.
CoRNWALLis, Charles, First
Marquis, 176.
CoRNWALLis, British India in
the time of, 177.
CoRNVv^vLLis, death of, 185.
CuRZON, George Nathaniel,
First Baron, 222.
D
Dad Kishen Raj, 166.
Dahir, 85.
Dalhousie, James Andrew
Brown- Ramsay, First Mar-
quis, 131, 202-8, 230.
Dalhousie's work, estimate of,
208.
Damayanti, 16.
Dandin, 65.
Dandupant, see Nana Sahib.
Dantidurga, 78.
Dara, death of, 117.
Darius Hystaspis, 23.
Darjeeling- made summer resi-
dence of Government, 195.
DasakumarcJiarita, (Dandin),
65.
Dasannmis, 89.
Dasaratha, 15, 28.
Dasaratha, Maurya, 28.
Dasa-var}ia, 8, 15.
Dates of ancient Indian History,
29.
Daud Khan, death of, iii.
Daulat Khan Lodi, 107
Daulat Rao Sindhia, 214.
Davis, 148.
Debal, 85.
Deccan, the, iii.
,, attempted conquest of
the, by Shah Jahan, 115.
Deccan, climate of the, v.
,, Kingdom of the, loi.
,, people of the, v.
,, temperature of the, v.
,, vegetable products of
the, V.
Delhi, batde of, 183.
,, founding of, 72.
., Kingdom of, 99.
,, proclamation at, by Lord
Amherst, 193.
Demetrios, 42.
Deogaon, Treaty of, 183.
Deslialiikaris, 137.
DesJipandias, 137.
Devabhuti, 49.
Devagiri, 79, 96, 97.
Dharasena IV., 62, 75, 76.
Dharmapala, 69, 73.
Dharniashastra, 52, 64.
Dharniasiitras, (manuals for
civil and criminal law), 37.
Dharnikot, 48.
Diiruva, 70.
Dhuvasena, 62.
Dhulip Singh, 144, 201, 203.
Digvijaya (world conquest), 59.
DiLWAR Khan, 100.
Din-i-llalii, 1 12.
Dinnaga, 65. •^
Diu, loi, 146.
GENERAL INDEX.
Diwan, 113.
Divvani of Bengal and Bihar,
grant of, to East India Com-
pany, by Shah Alam II., 125.
Dhvan-i-Aui, 116, 117.
Diivan-i-Khas, 116.
Donab3'u, fall of, 192.
Dost Ali, 151, 155.
Dost Muhammad, 144, 197,
199.
Drake, Roger, 160, 161.
Dravidian Kingdoms, 23.
,, languages, 22.
Dravidians, conflict of the, with
the Aryans, 7.
Dronasimha, 59, 76.
Dual system of Government,
165.
DuFFERiN, Frederick Temple
Hamilton-Temple Blackwood,
First Marquis of, 220.
Dumas, 151, 152.
DuPLEix, Joseph Fran9ois, Mar-
quis, 152, 153, 156.
Durbar at Agra, 214.
,, Delhi, 218.
DUSHYANTU, 65.
Dutch, the, in India, 147.
Dvara samudra, 79, 96.
DWARKANATH TaGORE, 1 94.
E.
Earthquakes, 222.
Eastern Chalukyas, 81.
East India Company, abolition
of, 213.
,, and the Dutch, 148.
,, formation of, 148.
,, grant of Dewani of Ben-
gal and Bihar to, 125.
,, placed under direct con-
trol of a Board of
Ministers, 174.
East Inci'a Company, renewal
of charter of, 195.
East India Company's pice of
1833. .195-
Economic condition, ,16.
Edinburgh, Duke of, visit to
India of, 217.
"Edicts" of Asoka, 27,36, 40, 48.
Education, 38, 202, 207, 217.
232.
Education and art of writing, 38.
Edward vii. Emperor of India,
2-2.2.
Edwardes, Major-Gen. Sir
Herbert Benjamin, 203.
Elgin I., Eighth Earl, James
Bruce, 214.
Elgin II., Ninth Earl, Victor
Alexander Bruce, 221, 222.
Ellenborough, Edward Law,
First Earl, 199.
,, recall of, 200.
Emigration, 231.
Empire —
First (Maurya), 22, et seq.
Second (Gupta), 55, et seq.
Third (Turki), 92, et seq.
P'ourth (Mughal), 107, etseq.
Fifth (British), 214, et seq.
English and the French, struggle
between the, 153-157.
,, attempts to reach India,
147.
,, factory at Hughli, 116.
,, made the official language,
ig6.
,, massacre of the, at
Amboyna, 147.
,, settlements, early, 149.
EuDEMos, 25.
Eukratides, 42.
Europe and India contrasted, i.
,, ,, in early days,
145-
Factory at Hughli, of the
English, 1x6.
8
GENERAL INDEX.
Fahian, 57.
,, travels in North India of ,
63-
Faizi, 1 13.
Famine, 218, 222, 237, 238.
,, in Orissa, 215.
,, of 1877, 218.
Faruksiyar, 123, 160.
Fatehpur Sikri, battle of, 108.
Faujdars, 1 1 2.
P'eudatory Chiefs, 216.
Feudatory States, Lord Mayo's
dealings with, 216.
FiRDAUsr, gi.
First Christian settlement in
India, 54.
First (Maurya) Empire 25,
et seq.
,, ,, causes of disruption
of, 41.
,, ,, extinction of, 44.
FiRUZ II., 103.
FiRUZ III., gS, 99, 100, 103.
FiRUZ Shah II., see Jalaluddin.
Fitch, Ralph, 160
FoRDE, Col. Francis, 162.
Francis, .Wr Philip, 169, 174, 175.
French, Arrival in India of the,
149.
French Empire, attempt to
establish a, 153.
,, possessions in India,
present, 157.
vs. English, 153-157.
Frobisher, 148.
G.
Gaekwar, 132.
Gaharwar dynasty, the, 72.
Gaharwar Rajputs, 72.
Gama, Vasco Da, 145, 146.
Ganda, 71.
Gandamak, Treaty of, 219.
Ganda Deva, 88.
Gandhara Kingdom, 58.
Gandhara school of art, 53, 54.
Ganga dynasty, 45, 79.
Ganga Puri, 82.
Ganges Canal, excavation of,
202.
Gangeya Deva, gold coin of, 84.
Cniidavaha ( V'akpatirajaj, 69.
Gautama, see Buddha.
Gautamu^utra, 47.
Geriah, batde of, 164.
Ghazi-uddin, 125.
GlIAZI-UDDIN BaLBAN, 93, 94.
Ghazi-uddin Ghori, 93.
Ghazi-uddin Tughlak, 97.
Ghazni Empire, 87.
Ghori dynasty, 93, 94.
Gillespie, Major-Gen. Sir
Robert Rollo, 189.
Gitagovinda (Jayadeva), 90.
GoDDARD, Brig-Gen. Thomas,
171.
Godeheu, 156.
Golden mosque, 106.
Golkonda Kingdom, 102.
GoLLAS, see Mihiragula.
GONDOPHARES, 45, 54.
Gonds, 2.
GOPALA, 70, 73.
GouGH, Hugh, First Viscount,
200, 201, 203.
Government, dual system of,
165.
GoviNDA Singh, Guru of the
Siklis, 140.
GOVINDA III., 69, 70, 78, 81.
Grseco-Bactrian conquest, 42.
Grammar, 35, 36.
Grand Trunk Road, extension
of, 204.
Granth (Nanak), 140.
"Great Golden Mosque" at
Gaur, 106.
Great Plain, ii.
"Great Proconsul of India,"
the, 185.
Great Satrapy, rise of ^.he, 47.
Grecian culture, 51.
GENERAL INDEX.
Grihya siitras (manuals of
domestic rites), 37.
Gujarat, battle of, 203.
,, Kingdom of, 46, 47, 56,
62, 67, 70, 75, 76, 92, 96,
98, 99, lOI.
GuLAB Singh, 201, 202.
Gupta dynasty, 55-57, 63, 68,
73-
,, ,, later, 67, 68, 73.
,, empire, 56, 58-61, 76.
,, era, 56.
Gurjara empire, 69, 70, 76, 84.
Gurkha war, 189.
Guru Govinda Singh, see
Govinda Singh.
Gwalior, siege of, 87.
,, taken under British pro-
tection, 200.
H.
Haidar Ali, 132, 165, 166, 170,
172, 173, 181.
,, death of, 172.
Haiderabad, battle of, 200.
Haihayas, 83.
Hajjaj, 85.
Hala, 49.
Hamilton, Surgeon William,
160.
Hara Pala, 80.
Harakali Nataka ( Vigraha-
raja), 71.
Hardinge, Henry, First \'is-
count, 201-2.
Hari Gupta, 68.
Harihara I., 102.
Harihara ii., 102.
Hariharpur, capture of, 190.
Harris, George, First Baron, of
Seringapatam and Mysore,
180.
HARSHA'^autograph of King, 61.
T
Harsha Deva, Deccan coin of,
73-
Harsha Deva Siyaka, 73.
Harsha era, 62.
Harsha Vardhana, 61, 62, 64,
75. 77-
Hasan Gangu, see Bahman
Sha.
Hastings, Francis Rawdon,
First Marquis, 1 87 -191.
,, internal measures of, 191.
Hastings, Right Hon. Warren,
133, 156, 160, 166, 167,
175, 232, 238.
,, impeachment of, 175.
,, summary of work of, 174.
Hastivarman, 80.
Havelock, Major-Gen. Sir
Henry, 211.
Hemu, 109.
High Court of Calcutta, estab-
lishment of, 169, 214.
Himalayan region, iii.
Hinayana (little vehicle), 51.
Hinduism, 50, 235.
;, complete establishment
of, 88.
,. decline of, 105.
,, rise of, 62-63.
Hindustan, iii, 68.
Hindustani, 106.
HlUEN TSANG, 63.
HOLKAR, 132.
HoLWELL, John Zephaniah,i6i,
163.
Horse-sacrifice, medal of the, 63,
,, revival of the, 63.
HouTMANN, Cornelius, 147.
Hoysala Kingdom, 102.
Hoysalas, the, 79,96.
Hudson, 148.
Hughli, English factory at, 116.
Human sacrifices, 202, 235.
Humayun, ioi, 108-110.
,, death of no.
Huns, 58, 60, 67.
10
GENERAL INDEX.
HuSAiN Ali, Sayyid, 123, 129.
HuvisHKA, 46.
Hystaspis Darius, 23.
I.
Ibn-Batuta, 103, 106.
Ibrahim Lodi II., 99, 107.
Ibrahim SHARai, 106.
Ibrahim Sur, seizure of Delhi
by, 109.
I mad Shahi kingdom, 102.
Imamuddin, 202.
Immigrations, north-eastern, 3.
Immigrations, north-western,
7, 12.
,, southern, 14, 21.
Imperial service troops, 227.
Titles, 68, 70, 73, 76.
Income-tax, reduction of, 223.
India and Europe contrasted, i .
,, Bill, 174.
,, direction from which may
be invaded, in.
„ Europe and, in early
days, 145.
„ likened to a fortress, vi.
,, past and present, 224-235.
,, paucity of harbours of, v.
,, peculiar position of, vi.
,, physical features, i-vi.
,, undertheCrown, 2x4,^^5^9.
Indian Empire —
First, 22, et seq.
Second, 55, et seq.
Third, 92, et seq.
Fourth, 107, et seq.
Fifth, 214, et seq.
Indian National Congress, 236.
,, Press, liberty given to, 197.
,, Trinity, 20.
Indians, admission of, into the
public service, 193.
Indo-Aryan people, the, 15.
Indo- Aryans, culture of, 9.
,, language of, 39.
Indo-Aryans, political condition
of, 16.
,, states, 15.
,, united, in Northern India,
13-
Indo-Europeans, the, 5.
,, dispersion of the, 6.
Indo- Parthian Kingdom, over-
throw of, 46.
Indra, II, 20.
Indra III., 70.
Indraraja III., 78.
Indravarman, 45,
Indrayudha, 69, 75.
Indus and its tributaries, old
course of the, 74.
Industries, 228.
Infanticide, among Khonds, 202.
,, suppression of, 194.
Invasion, by Alexander, 23-25.
,, freedom from, 224.
Iranians, 7.
Iron Pillar and Qutub Minar, 57.
Islam, introduction of, 90, 91.
,, spread of, 104.
Islam Shah, 109.
Isvarasena, 50.
J.
Jahandar, 123.
Jahangir, 114. et seq, 149.
,, and Nur Jahan, coin of,
114.
Jahansoz, see Alauddin.
Jails, 233.
Jain literature, 36, 37, 64.
,, monks, 89.
Jainism, 29, 30, 41.
,, rise of, 29.
Jajalla I., 84.
Jalaluddin Khalji, 95.
Janaka, 16.
Jarasandha, 16,
Jaunpur, Kingdom, 100.
Jaya Chandra, 72, 9*^.
Jaya Deva, 90.
GENERAL INDEX.
II
Jayaditya, 65.
Jaya Gupta, 68.
Jaya Pala, 71.
,, of Kanauj, 86, 87.
,, of the Punjab, 86.
Jayapida, 69.
Jeswant Rao Holkar, 134.
Jeswant Singh, 121.
Jhansi, Ra7ii of, 210.
Jhi Mall, 113.
Jina (Spiritual Conqueror), 31.
JiviTA Gupta, 68;
Jiziya, 91.
,, re-imposition of, by
Aurangzeb, 120.
,, withdrawal of, by
Akbar, 112
Jumma Musjid, 116.
Jumna Canal, 98.
Junagarh, inscriptions on the
rock of, 47.
K.
Kabir, 105.
Kabirpanthis, 105.
Kabul, embassy to, 187.
Kadambari (Bana), 65.
Kadambas, 49.
Kadphises I., 46.
Kailasa, Rock-temple of, 53.
Kaiqobad, 95.
Kakatiya dynasty, 84.
Kakka II., 79.
Kalachuri dynasty, 50, 56, 72.
Kalachuri era, 48.
Kalanga, capture of fort of, 189.
Kalidasa, 59, 65.
Kalinga, 27, 42, 43, 45.
„ conquest of, by Asoka, 27.
,, independence of, 42.
Kalinjar, siege of, 87.
Kanarese, 2.
Kanauj, 'capital, 61, 68, 87.
,, dynasty, 61.
Kanauj, kingdom, 68.
,, Mahmud's campaign
against, 87.
,, sack of, 71.
Kanchipur, 78, 83.
Kandahar, 188.
Kangra, capture of fort of, 87.
Kanishka, 46, 51.
,, gold coin of Buddha, 46.
Kanvayana dynasty, 44.
Kanyakubja, 15.
Kapilavastu, 31, 33.
Karauna dynasty, 97, 104.
Karim Khan, 188.
Kay ma (acts), 21, 34.
Karnadeva, 84.
Karnatic War, first, 153.
,, second, 154.
Karor, battle of, 45.
Kasikavriti ( Vamana and Jaya-
ditya), 65.^
Kathseans (Kathis), 24.
Kathiawar, establishment of a
college for chiefs of, 217.
Katyayana, 81, 82.
Kauravas, 14.
Kausambi, 15, 56.
Keralas, 22, 23.
Khalji dynasty, of Delhi, 73, 84.
94, 95. 97> 103-
,, of Malwa, 100.
Khalsa (Sikh commonwealth),
140, 141, 142, 144, 201, 203.
,, army, misgovernment of,
144.
Kharavela, 42, 49.
Kharoshthi form of writing, 40.
Khasis, 2.
Khisr Khan, 99.
Khonds, 202.
Khusrau Malik, 88.
Khusru, 97.
Khusru II, 66, 77.
Kiratarjuniya (Bharavi), 65.
Kirtivarman II, 78.
Koch, 225.
Koh-i-Nur, 124.
12
GENERAL INDEX.
KOKALLA I, 83.
Kolarians, 2.
Kols, 2.
Kosala, 15, 23.
Krishna, 15, 48, 80.
Krishna II., 83.
Krishna Gupta. 68, 73.
Krishna Raja, 73.
Krishna Raja Wadiar, 166,
181.
Krishnavarna, 8, 15.
Kshatrapa (satrap), 25.
Kshatriya, 17, 18, 23, 30, 31.
KuMARA Gupta I., 57.
Kumara Gupta II., 60
KUMRAN, 108.
Kumarila Bhatta, 90.
Kurola, battle of, 180.
Kiiruksheti'a, 10.
Kurus, 10.
Kushana empire, establishment
of, 46, 53, 58.
Kushana invasion, 46.
Kushanas, the great, 40, 47, 51,
58.
,, the little, 58, 86.
Kusinagara, 33.
L.
La Bourdonnais, Bertrand
Francis Mahe de, arrival of,
'53-
Lahore, treaty of, 201
,, second treaty of, 202.
Lake, Gerard, first I'iscount,
125, 183, 184, "193.
Lakshmana Sena, 75.
Lakshmaniya era, 75.
Lalitaditya Muktapida, 69.
Lalkot or Red P'ort, 72.
Lalliya, 86.
Lally, Thomas Arthur, Count
de, and Baron de Tollendal,
156, 162.
Lancaster, 148.
Land, recording grants of, on
copper-plates, 63.
Language, Aryan, 8.
,, Dravidian, 22.
,, Indo- Aryan, 39.
Lansdow^ne, Henry Charles
Keith Petty-Fitzmaurice,F?yif/r
Marquis, 221.
Lapse, Doctrine of, 204, 205,
208, 213, 227.
Laswari, battle of, 183.
Law, 151,
Lawrence, Sir Henry Mount-
gomery, 202, 203, 211.
,, John Laird Mair, First
Baron, 203, 204, 215.
Learned professions, 237.
Leeds, William, 148.
Legislative Councils, enlarge-
ment of Imperial and Pro-
vincial, 221.
Lenoir, 151.
Liaka, 44.
Lichhavis, 56.
Linga, the, 20, 88.
Literature, Arabic, 89.
,, Brahmanic, 19.
,, Persian, 89, 91.
,, Sanskrit, 19, 36, 64, 89.
Little Kushans, 58.
Local Self Govt. Act, 1882, 220.
Lodi dynasty, end of, 108.
Lower Burma, annexation of,
204.
Lucknow, treaty of, 181.
Lumbini Park, now known as
Rummin Dei, 31.
Lysias, 43.
Lytton, Edward Robert Bulwer,
First Earl, 218.
M.
Maabar Coast, 96.
MacNaghten, Sir William,
198. i
MACPHERSON,6VrJohn, 174, 176.
GENERAL INDEX.
13
Madhava, 105.
Madhu Rao, Fourth Peshwa,
132.
Madhu Rao II, Sixth Peshwa,
I33> 170. 171-
Madhu Rao Narayana See
Madhu Rao II.
Madhya-desa, 17.
Madras, siege of, 156.
,, treaty of, 171.
Magadha, 16, 22-26.
Magha, go.
Magistrates required to perform
duties of both judges and
■' collectors of revenue, igi.
Mahaba, 72, 84.
MaliabJiarata, 14.
Maharaja, 15, 56, 76.
Maharajpur, battle of, 200.
Maharashtra, 48, 121.
Maharathyias, 48.
Mahavira, founder of Jainism,
30.
Mahay ana (great Vehicle), 51.
Mahel capture of, 171.
Mahendra, 28.
Mahendrapala, 70.
Mahendravarman II., 81,
Mahipala, 70, 75.
Mahmud I., 95, 96.
Mahmud II., 97, 99.
Mahmud, of Ghazni, 71, 85-88,
Mahmud, campaigns of, against
Indian kingdoms 87.
Mahmud, sack of Kanauj by
Sultan, 71.
Mahmud, Indian coin of, 88.
Maiwand, battle of, 219.
Malati Madhaba (Bhavabhuti),
90.
Malava dynasty, 24, 45, 47, 59,
60.
Malik Kafur, 80, 82, 83, 96.
Malik Khusru, 82.
Malik'^Sarwar, 100.
Malkher, 73, 78.
Malloi (Malava) tribe, 24.
Malmsbury, William, of, 147.
Malwa kingdom, 42, 47, 58, 73,
77, 90, 92, 93, 96, 99, 100, loi.
Man Singh, 113.
Manava Dliarnia Shastra, 52.
Mandasor, 61.
Mangalore, treaty of, 172.
Manipur rebellion, 221.
Mansabdars, 112, 138.
Mansel, Charles Grenville, 203.
Mansura kingdom, 85.
Manu, Code of, 52.
Maphuz Khan, 154.
Maqbul Khan, 98.
Mara (the Evil One), 32.
Maratha administration, 137.
,, army, 135.
chiefs, confederacy of, 131,
139, 182, 184, 185.
,, confederacy, causes of
downfall of, 134.
,, revenue system, 138.
,, system of war, 136.
Maratha war, first, 133, 170.
,, second, 125, 182.
,, third, 183, 191.
Marathas, rise of the, 127.
Marathi language, 48.
Maritime trade, vi, 39.
Martin, 150-151.
Maruts, 11.
Mathura, 15, 44, 87.
Maues (Mogos), 44.
Mauritius, 187.
Maurya empire, 22, etseq.
Mayo, Richard Southwell
Bourke, Sixth Earl, 215-217,
227, 232.
,, assassination of, 217.
Mazimdar, 138.
Medicine, 38, 53.
Megasthenes, 37, 82.
Meghduta (Kalidasa), 65.
Meghavarana, 56.
Menander (or Milinda), 43.
Metcalfe, Sir Charles, 197.
14
GENERAL INDEX.
Miani, battle of, 200.
MlHIRAGULA, 59, 60.
Mihiri clan, 76.
MiLDENHALL, John, I48.
MiLiNDA (Menander) 43.
Mimanisa (enquiry), 52.
MiNHAJUDDIN, 106.
MiNTo I., Sir Gilbert Elliot,
first Earl, 186.
MiNTO II., Gilbert John Murray
Kynynmond Elliot, Fourth
Earl, 223.
Mir Jafar, see Mir Muham-
mad Jafar.
MiR JuMLA, 1 19.
Mir Kasim Alt, 163, 164.
MiR Muhammad Jafar, better
known as Mir Jafar, 161 162,
164.
Missils (Sikh confederacies),
141.
Mogos (or Maues), 44.
MoiRA, Lo7'd, see Hastings,
Marquis of.
Mong-hyr, capture of, 164.
Mon-khmer, i.
Monopoly, abolition of Com-
pany's Indian, 187.
Monotheism, 20.
MoNSON, Brigadier-Gen. the
Hon. William, 1S4.
Moplas, 146.
Moti Masjid, 116.
MuAZZAM, 123.
Mubarak Shah, 80.
Mudki, battle of, 201.
Mughal empire, break-up of,
123.
,, ,, in the time of Aurang-
zeb, 118.
Muhammad I., Khalji, 73, 95,
96, 97, 104.
,, gold Sikandar-as-Sani coin
of, 96.
Muhammad II., Tughlak 97,
98, loi, 104.
Muhammad, Brass token of, g8.
Muhammad Adil Shah, 109.
Muhammad Alauddin, 92, 95.
Muhammad Ali, 155, 156, 165.
181.
Bahadur Shah, 125, 126.
Ghori, 67, 72, 88, 93, 94.
i-Bakhtiyar, 75, 93,.
-i-Oasim, 85.
Shah, 123, 124.
Muhammadan conquest, the,
69, 75, 86, 90, 92.
,, culture, 105.
,, Empire, first, 94, et seq.
MuizuDDiN, see Muhammad
Ghori.
Mularaja I., 76.
Mulhar Rao Holkar, 191.
Mulraj Diwan, Governor of
Multan, 203
Multan, capture of, 203.
,, kingdom, 85.
MuMTAJ Mahal, 116.
Mundas, i.
Municipalities, 320, 231, 235.
MuntakhaJiab-ut-Tawariq
(Badauni), 113.
Murad, 117.
,, death of, 117.
Murray, Col., 184.
Mutiny, Sepoy, 208-212.
Muzaffar I., of Gujarat, loi.
MuzAFFAR Jang, 155, 156.
Mysore, 165, 166, 181.
Mysore war, first, 165.
,, ,, second, 156, 171.
,, ,, third, 177.
,, ,, fourth 180.
N.
Nadir (Nazir) Jang, 155.
Nadir Shah, 124, 141, 151,224.
,, ,, invasion of India by,
124. ff
Nagabhata, 69, 70.
GENERAL INDEX.
1-5
N agar j una, 51.
Nagarjuni caves, 29.
Nagarkot, capture of, 87.
Nahapana, 47, 49.
Najmud-daulah, 165.
Nala, 16.
Nalopakliyana, 16.
Nana Farnavis, 133, 170, 178,
. 180.
,, ,, death of, 182
Nana Sahib (Dandu Pant),
130, 205, 209, 210.
Nanak, Guru of the Sikhs, 140.
Nanda dynasty, 23, 24, 26.
Nanda Kumar, 170, 175.
Nandivarman, 81.
Nanja Raj, 166.
Napier, Sir Charles, 200.
Napier, of Magdala and
Caryngton, Robert Cornehus,
first Baron, 212.
Napoleon Bonaparte, 180.
Narasimha Gupta, 59.
Narasimha Varman, 78.
Narayan Rao, fifth Peshwa,
133. 170-
Nasrat Shah, 106.
Nata (or Naya) clan, 30.
National Congress, 235, 236.
Natives in service, 193, 202,
208, 213.
Nazir Ali, 165.
Nazir fNadir) Jang, 155.
Neill, Brigadier-Gen. James
George Smith, 211.
Nelson, Horatio, Viscount, and
Duke of Bronte, 180.
Nestorian Missionaries, 54.
New Buddhism, rise of , 50.
New Delhi, foundation of, by
Shah Jahan, 116.
Newbery, John, 148.
Newfoundland, discovery of,
147.
Newspapers, 192, 197, 235.
NiadeSii, 138-
Nicaea, 25.
Nicholson, Major-Gen. Sir
Lothian, 21 1.
NicoLO Conti, 103.
Nikator, 26.
Nine Gems of Vikramaditya's
court, 64.
Nirgranthas, 30.
Nirvana (peace), 35.
Nishadha, 16.
Niti Sataka (Bhartrihari), 65.
Nizam Shahi kingdom, 102.
Nizam-ul-Mulk, 154.
Non-intervention policy, 179.
Non- Regulation Provinces, 207.
Northbrook, Thomas George
Y^armg, first Earl, 218.
Northern Empire, disruption of
the, 68.
NoTT, Major Gen. Sir William,
199.
NuR Jahan, i 14.
Nyaya, 53.
0.
Ochterlony, Brigadier-Gen.
Sir David, 189, 190.
Ohind, 24.
Orissa famine, 218.
O'Shaughnessy, 229,
Oudh, annexation of, 205, 206,
209.
„ assumption of title of king
by Nawab Wazir of, 202.
,, Begums of, 169, 173.
,, Jaunpur kingdom, 1 00.
,, warningto king of, against
misrule, 202.
OuTRAM, Lieut.-Gen. Str
James, 211.
P.
Pagahs, 135.
Painting, cultivation of the art
of, 65.
i6
GENERAL INDEX.
Paithan, 49.
Pala dynasty, 73.
Pali or Prakrit language, 36.
Pallava kingdom, 80.
Pallavas, 50, 56 79, 81.
Panchala, 15.
Panda vas, 14.
Pandyas, 22, 23, 77, 78, 82.
Panini, 36, 37, 65.
Panipat, first battle of, 107.
,, second battle of, 109.
,; third battle of, 125, 141,
Panniar, battle of, 200.
Pantheism, philosophic, 20.
Paradis, 154.
Paris, treaty of, 156.
Parmar dynasty, 71, 72, 73.
Parasvanath, 30.
Parthian invasion, 45.
,, race, 41.
Patala, 137.
Pataliputra fort, 23, 26, 42.
Patanjali, 38, 42.
Pathan empire, [a misnomer],
94, et seq.
Pauravas, 24.
Peacock throne of Shah Jahan,
116.
Permanent Settlement of
Bengal, 178.
Persia, embassy to, 187.
Persian gulf, 3.
,, language, 106, 195.
,, literature, 91 .
Peshwas, 129-134.
,, house of the, 130.
Philosophic pantheism, 20.
Philosophy, 12, 20, 53.
Pice, Compan3''s, of 1833, '95
Pillar, inscribed, 26, 28. 56,
Pindari war, 190.
Pindaris, 187, 189, 225-227.
Piprahva stupa, 33.
Pirates, 226.
Pitt's India Bill, 174.
Piyadassi (the gracious) assum-
ption of title of, by .Asoka, 27.
Plague, 221.
Plain of northern India, the
great, ii.
Plassey, battle of, 161, 208.
Pliny, 82.
Police, 233.
Political condition, 16.
,, progress, 234.
Pollock, Field-Marshal Sir
George, 199.
Pondichery, capital of the
French, 150-154 156, 157.
Popham, Lt.-Gen. William,
171. 173-
PoRos, defeat of, Jhelum, 24. '
,, murder of, 25.
Portuguese, the, in India, 145,
147.
arrival of the, 103.
possessions in India, 146-
147.
Post and Telegraph Depts, 229.
PoTTiNGER, Maj or EXdr ad, 198.
Prabhakara Vardhana, 61,
Prajapati ( Lord of the Creation j ,
20.
Prajnaparamita ( Nagarjunaj,
51-
Prakrit (Pali) language, 36, 64.
Pravarasena II, 61,
Prayaga, 56.
,, religious convocation at,
62.
Prendergast, Sir Harry North
Dalrymple, 221.
Press, freedom of \'ernacular,
192.
,, liberty given to India, 197.
Prithvirvja (or Rai Pithora;,
72, 93-
Proclamation at Delhi, by Lord
Amherst, 193.
,, of Oueen Victoria, 213.
Prome, capture of, 192.
Provincial contract system, 215.
Ptolemy, 47, 49. *
PuLAKESiN I., 77.
GENERAL INDEX.
17
PULAKESIN. II., 61, 66, 77.
PULOMAVI II., 47, 49.
PULOMAVI III, 49.
Punjab, early historv of the,
85-86.
PuRA Gupta, 58.
Puranas, 44, 64.
Purnia, rebellion ot Raja of,
162.
Purva iniiiuimsu, 52.
Pushyamitra, 24, 49.
Q
Oarmatians, 85.
Oueen's Proclamation, 21^, 216,
■"218.
Outb Minar, 106.
Outb Shahi kingdom, 102.
OUTBUDDIN, 106.
OuTBUDDIN .\lBAK, 72, 93.
Outub .Minar, Iron Pillar and, 57.
Raghoba, 120, 121, 132, 133,
170, 171.
invasion of the Punjab
by, I3»-
Raghuji Bhonsla, 134, 152.
Raghunath Rao, see Raghoba.
Raghuvamsa (Kalidasa), 59, 65.
Raijit Singh, 189.
Railways, 217, 231.
Rajagriha, 23.
Raj any a, 9.
Rajaraja I., 82.
Rajasekhara, 90.
Ra'iaiarangini (Kalhana), 60,
87.
Rajendra I., 82.
Rajendra II., 82.
Rajgarh, Sivaji's fort at, 128.
Rajput -revolt during Aurang-
zeb's reign, 120.
Rajputana, 71, no, 222.
Rajputs, pacification of, by
Bahadur Shah, 123.
Rajyapala, 71.
Rajyavardhana, 61.
Rama, 15.
Ramabhadra, 70.
Ramadeva, 80.
Ramananda, 105.
Ra.vianuja, 105.
Ramayana, 15.
Rammohan Roy, Raja, 195.
Rana Sanga, 108.
Rani Bai, 85.
Ranjit Singh, 143, 186, 197.
Rashtrakutas, 73, 78, 79, 80.
Rathiyas (Marathasj, 127.
Ratnavali (Harsha), 64.
Rawar, 85.
Raya dynast)-, 85.
Raziyyat, Begum, 94.
Regulating Act, 168.
Religion, 20, 233, 235.
Religion, Brahmanic, 20.
Religious toleration, 233.
Rent .\ct, 214.
Residency of Lucknow, 211.
Rich (vedic verse), 19.
Rigveda, 19.
description of the, 9.
RiPON, George Frederick Sa-
muel, First Marquis, 219.
Roads and canals, 231.
Roberts, Frederick Sleigh,
First Earl, 219.
Rock-temple of Kailas, 53.
Roe, Sir Thomas, 149.
,, embassy of, 115.
Rohilla war, 168.
Rohillas, 125, 168.
Rose, Sir Hugh, 212.
Rudradaman, 47, 49.
Rudrasimha, 48.
Rummin Dei, 28, 31.
Saadat Ali, 181, 202.
Sabuk Tigin, 17.
i8
GENERAL INDEX.
Sacrifices, human, amon^
Khonds, 202.
Sadar Courts, abolition of. 214.
Sadar Diwani Adalut, 167.
Safdar Ali, 152.
Sahu, 123, 124, 129.
St. Thomas, 54.
St. Thome, battle of, 154.
Saisunaga dynasty, 23.
Saiva orders, 89.
Saivas, 20, 38, 89.
Saka era, 46.
,, invasion, 43.
,, satraps, 45-47.
Sakas, 43-46, 76.
Sakasthana, 43.
Sakta, 89.
Sakti, 89.
Sakunta/a (Kalidasa), 65.
Sakyas, 31, 33, 39.
Salabat Jang, 155.
Salar Jang, Nawab Sir, 210.
Salbai, treaty of, 171, 172.
Sale, Major-Gen. Sir Robert
Henry, 198, 199.
Salim, see Jahangir.
Salt tax, reduction of, 223.
Samaveda, 19.
Sambhaji, 120, 129.
Sam hit a (Charaka), 53.
Samhitas (collection), 19.
Samsara, 21.
Samudra Gupta, 56, 80.
,, ,, revival of
horse sacrifice by, 63.
Sanchi, 54.
Sangala, 24.
Sangrama Simha, Rana, 108.
Sankara Acharya, 89, 90.
Sankhya philosophy, 38, 52.
Sanskrit language and literature,
revival of, 64.
Sanskrit literature, 19, 36, 37,
64, 65, 89, 105.
Sanskrit, rise of, as a literary
language, 36.
Santhals, 2.
Sapta-Sataka (Hala),49.
Sarva Darsana Sangraha
(Madhava), 105.
Sassanian dynasty, 47.
Sat.\karni Gautamiputra, 4q.
Satara, annexation of, 205.
fort of, 124.
Satavahana dynasty, 50.
Sati among Khonds, 202.
,. suppression of, 194.
Satiyas, 48.
Satraps, 25, 44-46, 49.
Satrapy, rise of the great, 47.
Saurashtra, kingdom of, knowrr
as the Great Satrapy, 47,
Savana, 105.
Sayana, 105.
Sayyid Abdulla, 123, 129.
Sayyid Dynasty, 99.
Sayyid Husain Ali, 123, 129.
Sciences, 53.
Sculpture, 53.
Scythians, 41, 43.
Second (Gupta) empire, 55, etseq
Second empire, division of, into
north and south, 61.
Segauli, treaty of, 190.
Seleukos Nik.ator, 26.
Sena dynasty, 75.
Senapati , 76.
Sepoy Mutiny, 203, 208-12, 230.
Seringapatam, fall of, 166.
,, siege of, 180.
Seven Years' War, 156, 161.
Shah Alam, 183.
Shah Alam II., 125, 133, 135,
164, 168, 183.
Shah Jahan, 115-117.
civil war among sons
of, 1 16.
orold coin of, 1 17.
imprisonment of, 117
peacock throne of,
116.
Shah Shuja, 197, 198, 199.
Shah Zaman, 142, 18:.
Shahnama (Firdausi), 91.
GENERAL INDEX.
19
Shahji Bhonsla, 127.
Shamsuddin Altamsh, 94.
,, Ilyas, 1 01.
Shans, 4.
Sharqui dynasty, 100.
Suv-K Ai.1, Amir of Afghanistan,
215, 218.
Sher Khan, assumption of title
of Sher Shah by, 108.
Sher Khan Lodi, 150.
Sher Shah, death of, 109.
Shodasa, 44.
Shore, Sir }ohn, 179.
Shuja, defeat of, at Agra, 117
9huja-ud-Daulah, 164.
,. death of, 169.
Siddhartha, see Buddha.
Sighelmus, Bishop of Sher-
hurn, 147.
Sikandar-as-Sani , 96.
SiKANDAR SUR, I09, IIO.
Sikh army, disbandment of, 203.
Sikh war, first, 201.
,, ,, second, 203.
Sikhs, confederacy of the, 139.
,, origin of the, 140.
persecution of the, bv the
Mug-hals, 140.
,, religion of the, 140.
,, struggle of the, with
Ahmad Shah Abdali 141 .
Sikkim, annexation of, 204,
SiLADiTYA, q/J/a/7f a, dethrone-
ment of, 61.
SiLADiTYA VI., of Gujarat, 76.
Silidars, 135.
Simharaja, 71.
Simla, made summer residence
of the Governor- General, 195.
SiMUKA, 48.
Sindh, annexation of, 200.
,, earl}' history of, 85.
,, embassy to, 187.
SiNDHiA, 132, 133.
SiNGHANA, 79, 80.
Siraj-^d-Daulah, 160, 161.
,, accession to throne of, 160
Siraj-ttd-Daulah, death of, 162.
Sisupalabadha (Magha), 90.
Sita, 16.
Siva, 3, ii, 20.
SivAji, 119, 188.
,, birth of, 127.
,, death of, 129.
,, enthronement of, 128.
made Viceroy of the
Deccan, 128.
present of gifts to, by the
English, 128.
,, ,, ,, ,, the French, 128.
,, raid of Karnatic by, 128.
,, sack of Surat by, 128.
Skanda Gupta, 58.
Slave dynasty, 94.
Sleeman, Sir William Henry,
194.
Smith, Major-Gen. ]o?,e.\A\, 166.
Smriti (tradition^, 37.
Snake, cult of, 3, 20.
Sobraon, battle of, 201.
Social condition, 37.
conference, 235.
,, progress, 234.
Solanki dynasty, 76.
Soma, 10, II.
Somesvara, 72, 79.
Somnath, sack of temple of, 88.
Southern empire under the Early
Chalukyas, 77.
Srauta siitras (manuals for
performing sacrifices), 37.
Sriramgaon, battle of, 155.
Sri Satakarni, 49.
Sritti (revelation), 37.
States, annexation of, by Dal-
housie, 205.
„ formation of, 15.
Stewart, Sir Donald, 219.
Strabo, 82.
Strato, 43.
Stupa, view of the oldest, at
Sanchi, 33.
Subahs, division of empire into,
by Akbar. 1 13.
20
GENERAL INDEX.
SUBANDHU, 65.
Subsidiary treaties, system of,
185. ,
SUDAS, 14.
SUDDHODANA, 3I.
Sudras, 8, g, 17, 18, 55.
Sunga empire, 44.
Sungabhritya, 44.
Supreme Council, remodelling-
of, 126.
Sur dynasty, 108.
Sura, 10,
Surashtra kingdom, 47.
Surat, establishment of French
factory at, 149.
,, sack of, by Sivaji, iig.
,, treaty of, 170.
Surdeslimitklit, 139.
SuRi, 92.
Surji Arjangaon, treaty of, 183.
Sursubahdars, 138.
SusuRMAN, 49.
SUSRUTA, 53.
Sutanati, grant of, to the Eng-
lish by Aurangzeb, 120.
Sutherland, Col. John, 195.
Sutra period, 37.
Sutras (manuals), 37.
Subandhu, 65.
Tagore, Dwarkanath, 194.
Tahmash, Shah of Persia, 109.
Tahqiqual Hind (Alberuni), 89.
Tai tribe, ii, 4.
Tailapa II., 79.
Taj Mahal, 115.
Tajiks, 92, 93.
Talikot, battle of, 102.
Tamil language, 22.
Tamils, 2.
Tanka, 106.
Tantia Topi, 210, 212.
T antra, 64.
Tantra Vartika (Sankara Acha-
rya), 90.
Taxila University, 38.
Tea, 202, 228.
Telegraph, 207, 229.
Telingana, 84.
Telugu language, 22, 48.
Thagi, suppression of, 194,
235-
Thags, 194.
Thaneswar, 61, 72, 93.
Thebaw, King of Burma, 221.
Third Empire, dissolution of,
99.
Third Indian or first Muham-
madan Empire, 92, et seq.
TiASTENES, 47.
Tibet, 62, 144,
,, Commercial expedition to,
223.
Tibeto-Burmans, ii.
TiMUR, 99, 107, 126, 142.
,, house of,
,, invasionof India by, 107.
Tipu, 166, 171, 172, 176, 177,
178, 180, 181, 182, 185, 186.
,, death of, 180.
Tirah Campaign, 222.
ToDAR Mall, 113.
Toramana, 58, 59, 76,
Trade, 228.
Transmigration, doctrine of, 21.
Treaties, system of subsidiary,
185.
Trikalinga, 84.
Trilochanapala, 71.
Tripitaka (three baskets), 37.
TuGHLAa, Ghiyasuddin, 97
,, Muhammad II, 97.
Tughlaq Shahi dynasty, 97.
TUKAJI HOLKAR, I33.
Turki conquest, 86.
,, empire, condition of the
people under the, 103.
,, second invasion, 435.
,, Shahis, 86.,
,, Slaves, 94.
GENERAL INDEX.
21
U
Udai Singh, no.
Udayin, 23.
Uighur or Usun, 46.
Umachand (Amin or Amir
Chand), 161.
Universities, 38, 207, 222, 232.
Upanishad, 20.
Upper Burma, annexation of,
221.
Urdu, 106.
Uttar mimanisa, 52.
Vaccination, 238,
Vaisali, 15, 23, 30.
Vaiseshika, 53.
Vaisnava orders, 89.
Vaisnavas, 20, 38, 89, 105.
Vaisya, 8, 17, 18.
Vakpatiraja, 69.
Vallabhi kingdom, separation
of, from northern empire, 62.
Vamana, 65.
Vans Agnew, 203.
Vansittart, Henry, 163.
Varaha Mihira, 64.
Varuna, 20.
Vasavadatta (Subandhuj, 05.
Vasco da Gama, 103, 145, 146-
Vasishtiputra, 49.
Vasudeva Sungabhritya, 44,
47-
Vasumitra, 43.
Vatsaraja, 61, 69, 70, 73.
Vayu Purayia, 64.
Vedanta, 21, 38, 52, 90.
Vedas, 105.
Veddas, 2.
Vedic iiymns, 3, 9.
Vellore Mutiny, 186.
Vengi, 78.
Verelst, Henry, 166.
Vernalular press.f reedom of , 1 92,
Versailles, treaty of, I57. ^1--
Viceroy, creation ot Go\ernor-
General as, 213.
Victoria, Queen, assumption
of title of Empress of
India by, 218.
,, death of, 222.
Vidarbha, 16, 42.
Videha, 16.
ViDYAPATI, 105.
Vigraharaja, knoivii as Bisal
Deo, 71.
Villa ras (monasteries), 54.
Vijayanagar, 102.
VlJAYAPALA, 71.
Vijaya Sena, 75.
Vikrama era, 45, 60.
Vikramaditya, 45.
„ Kashmir coins of, 60.
,, "nine gems" of the court
of, 64.
Vikramaditya H., 78.
Vimaladitya, 82.
Vishnu, ii, 15, 20, 63, 80.
Vishnu Vardhana, 76, 77.
,, ,, coin of, 59.
,, ,, column of victory of, 59.
w.
Wahabis, 214.
Wandivvash, siege of, 171.
Wang Hiuen Tse, 62.
Warangal, 84, 96.
Wargaon, convention of, 170.
Warnak Rao, 182.
Wasil Muhammad, 188, 190.
Waterloo, battle of, 180.
W'atson, Admiral Charles, 161.
Wellesley, Gen. Str Arthur,
see Wellington.
Wellesley, Richard Colley,
Marquis, 1 80, 202.
,, work of, 185.
Wellington, Duke of, Arthur
Wellesley, 180.
Western Chalukyas, 82.
Western Marches, 71, 92, 93, 99,
22
GENERAL INDEX.
White Huns, 58.
William of Malmsbury,
147.
WiLLOUGHBY, Sir Hugh, 147.
WiLLOUGHBY, Lieut, 210.
Writing, introduction in India
of art of, 39.
Y.
Yadava dynasty, 79.
Yadava Singhana, 84.
Yagnasena Satakarni, 42.
Vajurveda, 19.
Yakub Khan, Amir of Afghani-
stan, 219.
Yasodharman, 59.
,, assumption of name of
Vishnu Vardhana by, 60.
Yasovarman, 69, 70, 72.
Yendabu, treaty of, 192, 204.
Yoga, 20, 38, 52.
Yoga sutra (Patanjali), 38.
Yudhisthira, 14
Yuechi, 43, 46.
z.
Zafar Khan, see MuzafTar 1.
Zamorin, the (Hindu Raja of
Calicut), 145.
Zeman Shah, see Shah Zaman.
Zemindars, origin of, 167.
DS
Hoernle, August Friedrich
U%
Rudoli"
H6^
A history of India
1909
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY