Skip to main content

Full text of "The history of the Loco-foco, or Equal Rights Party : its movements, conventions and proceedings, with short characteristic sketches of its prominent men"

See other formats


• 


THE  HISTORY 


OFTHE 


LOG  O-F  O  C  O 


EQUAL    EIGHTS    PARTY, 


ITS  MOVEMENTS,  CONVENTIONS  AND  PROCEEDINGS, 


WITH    SHORT 


CHARACTERISTIC    SKETCHES   OF    ITS    PROMINENT    MEN. 


BY  F.  BYRDSALL. 


u  Convince  me  that  a  principle  is  right  in  the  abstract, 
ticeifl.can." 


N  E  W-YORK: 

PUBLISHED  BY  CLEMENT  &  PACKARD,  180  PEARL 


PREFACE. 


THE  terms  Loco-Foco  and  Loco-Focoism  are  so  frequently 
used  to  designate  a  political  party  and  its  principles,  without 
much  being  definitely  known  of  those  to  whom  they  were  first 
applied,  that  it  has  become  necessary  that  their  history  should 
be  written,  not  only  as  a  work  of  interest  in  itself,  but  also  as  of 
some  importance  to  the  great  party  to  which  those  terms  have 
been  transferred. 

The  Author  of  this  little  work  has  been  urged,  for  some  years 
past,  to  write  it,  on  the  ground  that  no  person  was  so  well 
informed  of  the  movements,  principles,  and  men  of  the  party,  as 
he  who  was  in  it  from  the  first,  and  was  its  Recording  Secretary 
during  nearly  all  the  time  of  its  independent  existence.  Thus 
urged,  and  being,  withal,  of  the  opinion  that  if  he  did  not  write 
it  no  other  Loco-Foco  would,  and  that  such  a  work  was  neces- 
sary to  our  political  literature,  he  began  it  in  the  summer  of 
1842,  and,  through  many  interruptions,  completed  it  by  the  first 
of  October  following. 

This  little  book  may  be,  not  inaptly,  called  the  Bible  of  the 
Loco-Focos ;  for  it  contains  their  Genesis,  their  Exodus,  their 
Mosaic  law,  or  declaration  of  principles, — their  eventful  history. 
By  such  estimable  men  as  Moses  Jaques,  Pascal  B.  Smith,  James 
L.  Stratton,  John  M.  Ferrier,  A.  D.  Wilson,  Robert  Townsend, 
Jun.;  John  Hecker,  and  many  others  described  in  these  pages, 
was  the  Equal  Rights  party  encouraged  to  have  a  deeper  love 
for  Christian  Democratic  principles,  to  seek  more  knowledge  of 
them,  and  to  find  a  more  abiding  faith  in  them.  If  any  Loco- 
1* 


VI  PREFACE. 

Focos,  since  the  dissolution  of  the  party,  have  deteriorated  in 
these  respects,  and  do  not  show  forth  the  living  testimony,  it  is 
most  probably  because  they  are  in  the  midst  of  less  favorable 
circumstances  and  associations. 

The  Loco-Focos  had  an  important  mission  to  fulfil, — "  to  bring 
back  the  Democratic  party  to  the  principles  upon"  which  it  was 
originally  founded," — and  they  have,  in  part,  already  fulfilled  it. 
These  Methodists  of  Democracy  introduced  no  new  doctrines, 
no  new  articles,  into  the  true  creed;  they  only  revived  those 
heaven-born  principles  which  had  been  so  long  trodden  under 
the  foot  of  Monopoly,  and  forgotten,  that  they  were  termed  "  the 
new-fangled  notions  of  Loco-Focoism." 

Perhaps  some  readers  may  be  surprised  at  the  portraiture  of 
Loco-Focoism  here  presented,  so  different  from  that  which  the 
Newspaper  Press  has  delineated.  But  the  political  presses  of 
the  United  States  are  so  remarkable  for  their  misrepresentations, 
that  there  could  scarcely  be  a  greater  proof  of  the  near  approach 
of  the  Millenium,  than  that  their  columns  were  becoming  filled 
with  unadulterated  truth. 

To  those  plodding  critics  whose  literary  tastes  are  more  for 
the  antique  than  the  modern,  more  for  the  past  than  the  future, 
and  who  are  more  rctrogade  than  progressive  in  their  views,  the 
subject  of  the  Loco-Foco  Revolution  may  have  too  much  fresh- 
ness in  it,  may  not  be  sufficiently  stale,  and,  in  all  probability, 
they  may  consider  it  too  early  in  the  day  for  its  history  to  be 
written.  But  it  is,  in  fact,  because  the  Loco-Focos  were  the 
political  apostles  of  the  future,  and  were  much  in  the  advance  of 
their  cotemporaries,  that  their  history  is  the  more  important  to 
the  American  people,  and  particularly  to  the  rising  generation, 


CONTENTS. 


CHAPTER   I.  13 

Introductory — Division  in  the  Democratic  Republican  Party  in 
the  City  of  New  York  in  1835,  on  the  subject  of  Monopolies — 
Sketch  of  G.  H.  Evans  and  William  Leggett — Secret  Meet- 
ings of  the  Friends  of  Equal  Rights — Sketches  of  prominent 
Men — Persecution  of  Leggett — The  Johnson  Dinner  Move- 
ment— Nominations — Monopoly  and  Anti-Monopoly  Tickets — 
C.  G.  Ferris — Job  Haskell — Leggett's  Indisposition — Great 
Meeting  in  Tammany  Hall,  Oct.  29th — Description  of  the 
Usages — Rush  and  Contest  for  the  Chair — Alex.  Ming,  Jr. — 
Banners — Inscriptions — Struggle  for  Ascendency — Extinguish- 
ment of  Gas  Lights — Loco-Foco  Lights — and  Resolutions. 


CHAPTER  II.  28 

The  Whig  Press — The  anti-Monopolists  are  called  Loco-Focos — 
Abusive  epithets  of  the  New  York  Times — Party  discipline — 
Edict  of  the  Sachems — Young  Men's  General  Committee — 
Votes  on  Evening  Post  and  Anti- Monopoly  ticket — Old  Men's 
General  Committee — Remarks — Leggett's  Insanity — Reflec- 
tions on  his  bust  in  Tammany  Hall — Result  of  General  Elec- 
tion— Defections — Meeting  of  anti-Monopolists — Proceedings 
— Convention — Barnabas  Bates — Separate  organization  and 
compromise — Result  of  Committee  elections — Resolutions  of 
Independence  of  Tammany — County  Convention — Plan  of 
separate  organization — Proceedings  and  resolutions — Declara- 
tion of  principles — Sketch  of  Moses  Jaques. 


Vlll  CONTENTS. 

CHAP  TER  III.  43 

Election  of  Officers — Remarks  on  New  Organization — Sketch  of 
the  Old  Military  and  Civic  Hotel— Preparations  for  Charter 
Election — Nomination  of  W.  Leggettfor  the  Mayorlty — His  an- 
swer to  Committee — Alexander  Ming,  Jun.  nominated — He 
accepts— Extract  from  his  letter — The  Democrat— Ward  Nomi- 
nations for  the  Common  Council — Extracts  from  M.  Jaques' 
Address — Reflections — New  paper,  "The  Union" — Sketch 
of  its  Editor,  John  Commerford — Republican  Nominating 
Committee  of  1835 — Resolutions — Remarks. 

CHAPTER  IV.  54 

County  Convention  to  correspond  with  Presidential  Candidates — 
Remarks — Report  of  the  Correspondence — That  of  the  minor- 
ity of  the  Committee  adopted — Debate — Resolution  laid  on  the 
table — A  Compromise — Correspondence  with  Col.  Samuel 
Young — Remarks— Reply  to  Col.  Young — Remarks  respecting 
the  Union  and  the  Democrat. 

CHAPTER  V.  67 

State  Convention  at  Utica,  Sept.  loth — Proceedings — Resolution 
to  be  a  distinct  Party  adopted — Nominations  for  Gubernatorial 
Candidates — Isaac  S.  Smith,  and  Robert  Townsend,  Jr. — Sketch 
of  the  latter  by  himself — He  declines  the  Nomination — M. 
Jaques  unanimously  nominated — Close  of  the  Convention, 
with  Extracts  from  the  address  to  the  People — Correspondence 
with  Isaac  S.  Smith  and  M.  Jaques. 

CHAPTER   VI.  78 

Preparations  for  November  election  of  1836 — Meeting  to  ballot 
for  Congress  ticket — Objections  made  to  Edward  Curtis  and 
James  Monroe — A.  F.  Vache  vouches  for  them — Balloting — 
Messrs.  Hasbrouck,  Curtis,  Monroe  and  Ferris  nominated — 
Sketch  of  Stephen  Hasbrouck,  contrasted  with  N.  P.  Tallmadge 
— Success  of  political  apostacy — Sketch  of  Edward  Curtis — 
His  letter  to  Recording  Secretary  produces  dissatisfaction — 


CONTENTS.  IX 

Sketch  of  A.  F.  Vache — His  motion  respecting  the  letter  pre- 
vails, and  the  one  to  the  Committee  of  Correspondence  is 
taken  up,  and  E.  Curtis'  nomination  is  confirmed — Letters 
from  Stephen  Hasbrouck,  James  Monroe,  and  candidates  for 
the  Assembly — Eli  Moore's  nomination — F.  A.  Tallmadge's 
nomination  and  letter — Reflections. 


CHAPTER    VII.  92 

Remarks — Sketch  of  Clinton  Roosevelt — Great  Equal  Rights 
meeting  at  Military  Hall — Sketch  of  E.  Curtis's  speech — Of 
James  Monroe's — Each  of  the  nominations  adopted — The 
General  Election — The  Result,  with  remarks  on  Edward  Cur- 
tis, Eli  Moore,  C.  C.  Cambreleng,  Ogden  Hoffman,  F.  A. 
Tallmadge,  Robert  Townsend,  Clinton  Roosevelt — Special 
Election — Remarks — William  Leggett  and  the  Plaindealer — 
Reflections — His  Martyrdom  and  brief  Eulogy. 

CHAPTER    VIII.  99 

Park  meeting,  proceedings,  and  flour  riot — Description  and 
facts  respecting  it — Address  of  Committee  to  the  public —  • 
Sketches  of  some  members  of  the  Committee — Ming  selected 
as  a  Victim,  but  a  man  not  to  be  Victimized — Whig  logic 
and  Loco-Foco  syllogism — Another  Park  meeting,  March  6th, 
in  Vindication  of  Constitutional  Rights — Address  and  Resolu- 
tions— Sketch  of  John  H.  Hunt — Another  Park  meeting  called 
for  April  3d. 

CHAPTER    IX.  113 

Memorial  to  the  Assembly  in  relation  to  the  selection  of  the 
Bank  Investigating  Committee — Ungenerous  suspicions  of  the 
House  respecting  Mr.  Roosevelt — A  Committee  to  investigate 
the  Memorialists  appointed — M.  Jaques  and  Levi  D.  Slamm 
summoned,  but  they  require  their  expenses  to  be  paid — Sergeant- 
at-Arms  despatched  to  arrest  them — They  are  arraigned  for 
contempt  of  the  House — Proceedings  and  Reprimand — Ar- 
raigned again  for  a  second  contempt — Messrs.  Jaques  and 


X  CONTENTS. 

Slamm's  Protest — Proceedings — Profound  Resolution  of  Mr. 
King — Slamm  conforms  and  is  discharged  from  custody — Jaques 
alone  at  the  bar,  addresses  the  House,  and  gives  it  a  consti- 
tutional reprimand — End  of  the  affair,  with  remarks  on  the 
meanness  of  the  House  of  Assembly. 

CHAPTER   X.  133 

Equal  Rights  Party  Resolution  on  the  Contempt  case — Sketch 
of  Levi  D.  Slamm — M.  Jaques  nominated  as  candidate  for 
the  Mayoralty — Park  Meeting — Address  and  Resolutions — 
Nomination  of  M.  Jaques,  is  confirmed — Incident — Loco-Foco 
Nominations  for  the  Common  Council — Correspondence  with 
M.  Jaques — Election  Results — Remarks — Call  for  Park  Meet- 
ing, 3d  of  May — Meeting,  Address  and  Resolutions — Remarks 
— Run  on  the  Banks  for  Specie — Bank  white-washing  Com- 
mittee— Suspension  Law  and  Remarks — The  Credit  System 
turns  out  to  be  the  System  of  Debt. 

CHAPTER    XI.  145 

Election  of  Officers  of  the  Party — Great  Park  meeting,  June 
24th — Address  and  Resolutions — Course  of  the  President  of 
the  United  States  in  relation  to  the  Banks  and  Specie  Circu- 
lar, approved — A  State  Convention  called — F.  A.  Tallmadge 
censured  for  his  course  in  the  State  Senate  on  the  Specie  Cir- 
cular and  Bank  Suspension  law — Resolutions — Letter  from 
Samuel  Young. 


CHAPTER    XII.  157 

Recapitulatory  Remarks  on  the  position  of  the  General  and 
State  Administrations — Monopoly  Conspiracy  against  the  Pres- 
ident, developed  by  a  Letter  to  N.  P,  Tallmadge — Political  Di- 
lemma— Message  of  the  Special  Session — Strictures  on  the 
Inconsistencies  of  the  Monopolists  towards  "  New- York's 
favorite  son" — The  Loco-Focos  sustain  his  course — Demon- 
strations— State  Convention  at  Utica  of  the  Equal  Rights 
Party — New  Constitution  for  the  State — Extracts — Address 
to  the  People — Remarks. 


CONTENTS.  XI 

CHAPTER    XIII.  170 

Preparation  for  the  November  Election  of  1837 — Nominations 
made — Pledge  signed  by  the  Candidates — The  Nominations 
adopted  and  the  Party  pledges  itself  to  sustain  its  candidates 
— Committee  appointed  to  address  Mr.  Curtis  for  violating 
his  Pledge — Five  Loco-Foco  Candidates  nominated  at  Tam- 
many Hall — Committee  of  Conference  of  Union  of  the  De- 
mocracy— Candidates  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party  called  on  to 
resign,  but  most  of  them  refuse — A  Dilemma — C.  H.  Dougher- 
ty and  Henry  E.  Riell's  Resolution  to  desert  the  Equal  Rights 
Candidates  adopted — The  Pledge  makers  become  Pledge 
breakers — The  Edward  Curtis  investigation — Rump  Loco- 
Focos  and  Buffalo  Loco-Focos — The  Address  of  the  former — 
Fidelity — Decay  and  Fall  of  the  Military  and  Civic  Hotel — 
Conclusion. 


APPENDIX. 

Gilriinade  Ballad.        .        .        ,'•'.,        .        .        .        .         192 


HISTORY 


LOCO-FOCO  OR  EQUAL  RIGHTS   PARTY, 


CHAPTER   I. 

Introductory — Division  in  the  Democratic  Republican  Party  in  the 
City  of  New  York  in  1835,  on  the  subject  of  Monopolies — Sketches 
of  G.  H.  Evans  and  William  Leggett — Secret  Meetings  of  the 
Friends  of  Equal  Rights — Sketches  of  Prominent  Men — Persecu- 
tion of  Leggett — The  Johnson  Dinner— Movement — Nominations — 
Monopoly  and  Anti-Monopoly  Tickets — C.  G.  Ferris— Job  Haskell 

«  — Leggett's  Indisposition — Great  Meeting  in  Tammany  Hall,  Oct. 
29th — Description  of 'the  Usages — Rush  and  Contest  for  the  Chair — 
Alex.  Ming,  Jr. — Banners — Inscriptions — Struggle  for  Ascendancy 
— Extinguishment  of  Gas  Lights — Loco  Foco  Lights — and  Reso- 
lutions. 


It  is  better  to  prohibit  monopolies  in  all  cases,  than  to  permit  them  in  any. 

JEFFERSON. 

So  peculiarly  exciting  are  the  circumstances  connected 
with  the  rise,  progress,  and  dissolution,  of  the  Loco-Foco  or 
Equal  Rights  party,  of  the  city  of  New  York,  during  its 
eventful  life  of  two  years,  and  so  great  an  effect  has  that 
extraordinary  movement  had  upon  the  Democratic  Party 
of  the  state  and  nation,  that  a  faithful  history  of  its  con- 
ventions, its  principles  and  its  deeds,  with  brief  sketches 
of  its  active  men,  will  not  be  uninteresting  to  the  public, 
nor  useless  to  the  future  political  historian. 

It  is  but  the  truth  to  state  in  this  place  that  the  Work- 
ing Men's  Party,  which  arose  in  1828  and  dissolved  in 
about  two  years  afterwards,  was  the  progenitor,  to  some 
2 


14  HISTORY   OF   THE  [1835. 

extent,  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party.  Certain  it  is,  that 
most  of  the  measures  advocated  by  the  former  were  de- 
cidedly popular  with  the  latter,  and  both  were  equally 
hostile  to  banks  and  other  monopolies.  Nevertheless,  it 
was  Andrew  Jackson,  in  his  contest  with  the  Bank  of  the 
United  States,  who  enkindled  the  highest  opposition  in 
that  direction,  and  the  enthusiasm  which  he  excited 
against  the  National  Bank  soon  extended  itself  to  state 
banks.  Both  belonged  equally  to  one  system,  having 
privileges  of  a  similar  nature,  and  producing  evils  upon 
the  community  of  the  same  description. 

The  stirring  election  of  1834,  with  the  strong  pledge 
against  monopolies  which  the  candidates  of  the  Repub- 
lican Party  were  required  to  sign,  together  with  speech- 
es and  resolutions  of  the  same  character  at  political  meet- 
ings, as  well  as  the  circumstances  previously  mentioned, 
all  combined  to  plant  deeply  in  the  minds  of  that  party 
the  seeds  of  hostility  to  monopolies.  Vigorously  and  ably 
were  they  cultivated  by  George  H.  Evans,  editor  of  the 
Workingman's  Advocate  and  the  Man,  and  by  William 
Leggett,  editor  of  the  Evening  Post. 

George  H.  Evans  is  still  alive,  and  there  lives  not  a 
more  unpretending  incorruptible  man.  He  had  offers  of 
money  and  patronage  from  an  agent  of  the  United  States 
Bank,  soon  after  the  Courier  and  Enquirer  became  its 
champion ;  but  George  was  not  purchasable,  although  at 
that  time  he  was  not  only  poor,  but  considerably  involved. 
He  published  an  account  of  the  interview  which  Silas  E. 
Burrows  had  with  him,  and  the  offers  made  to  him,  which 
was,  we  believe,  never  contradicted.  Honest  George !  we 
can  see  him  in  our  mind's  eye,  in  his  murky  office  in 
Thames  street,  editor,  compiler,  printer,  &c.,  of  his 
daily  and  weekly  papers.  There  was  he  close  at  his 
desk,  attending  to  and  contending  for  all  the  rights  and 
interests  of  the  working  masses  of  mankind,  but  neg- 
lecting his  own  rights  and  interests  in  money  matters. 
Like  all  such  men,  he  had  his  full  share  of  difficulties,  and 
yet  he  made  up  his  excellent  newspaper  of  well  chosen 


1835.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  15 

selections,  and  with  editorial  matter  of  real  ability  ;  and 
he  was  seldom,  if  ever,  inconsistent.  In  short,  he  was  so 
naturally  imbued  with  the  spirit  of  democracy  that  he 
brought  it  to  bear  on  every  question  he  discussed. 

William  Leggett  was  a  man  of  far  more  ardent  tem- 
perament, but  utterly  immovable  by  either  friend  or  foe 
when  he  believed  himself  to  be  in  the  right.  He  was 
decidedly  the  contrary  of  those  despicable  politicians,  who, 
in  their  regard  for  expediency,  think  they  have  the  right 
to  compromise  principles.  Whatever  cause  he  espoused, 
he  gave  his  whole  heart  to  it,  and  expressed  his  views 
with  a  vehement  energy  that  carried  his  readers  along 
forgetful  of  time  or  length.  During  the  greater  part  of 
the  year  1835,  the  coming  forth  of  his  paper  was  looked 
for  daily  -with  the  most  eager  desire ;  for  it  was  well 
known  that  no  functionary  however  high,  no  party  how- 
ever strong,  no  editor  however  subtle,  could  escape  the 
deep-toned  thunder  of  his  invective  for  their  misdeeds, 
and  therefore  all  were  anxious  to  learn,  as  the  paper  came 
from  the  press,  upon  whom  or  what  the  bolt  had  fallen. 
He  was  truly  the  very  Jove  of  editors,  and  all  the  frater- 
nity stood  in  awe  of  him.  It  was  only  when  sustained 
by  party  that  they  dared  to  enter  the  lists  against  him. 

Thus,  the  Workingman's  Party,  the  measures  they  con- 
tended for,  the  writings  of  G.  H.  Evans,  the  course  of 
Andrew  Jackson  in  relation  to  the  monster  monopoly,  the 
resolutions  passed  at  Republican  meetings,  the  pledge 
against  monopolies,  the  eloquent  expositions  of  Leggett, 
with  the  visible  fact  that  the  sovereignty  of  the  people 
over  the  legislature  had  passed  into  the  hands  of  chartered 
institutions — all  these,  and  other  circumstances,  con- 
tributed to  excite  hostility  against  chartered  monopolies 
and  the  politicians  who  sustained  them.  Consequently, 
the  Republican  Party  became  divided  within  itself.  On 
the  one  side  were  the  Albany  Argus  and  the  New  York 
Times,  with  those  whom  the  latter  affectionately  styled 
"  the  oldest  and  wisest  of  the  party,"  together  with  a 
majority  in  each  of  the  General  and  in  most  of  the  Ward 


16  HISTORY   OF   THE  [1835 

committees,  and  nearly  all  the  office-holders  under  the 
general,  state,  and  city  administrations.  On  the  other 
side,  were  the  Evening  Post  and  the  Man,  with  the  free 
trade,  anti-monopoly,  hard-money  men. 

But  as  the  latter  division  was,  as  yet,  the  smallest  por- 
tion of  the  party,  it  had  to  exercise  secrecy  and  caution 
in  its  first  movements.  The  despotism  of  the  Republican 
Party,  with  its  aristocratic  usages  and  organization,  was 
so  energetic  and  pervading  in  those  days,  that  it  required 
both  moral  and  physical  courage  to  openly  attack  an  es- 
tablished dynasty  of  monopolies,  with  its  vassal  office- 
holders and  political  committees.  Besides,  it  was  held  as 
an  indisputable  truth,  that  nothing  could  justify  a  disor- 
ganizer,  and  that  he  who  attempted  for  any  cause  what- 
ever to  disturb  the  harmony  of  the  party,  was  a  monster 
to  be  shunned  and  hated  by  every  true  democrat. 

With  the  fear  of  this  party  despotism  before  their  eyes, 
the  friends  of  Equal  Rights  deemed  it  most  advisable  to 
privately  consult  and  select  delegates  from  most  of  the 
Wards,  to  meet  in  secret  convention,  and  not  more  than 
twice  in  succession  in  the  -same  place.  The  Broadway 
House,  the  Constitutional  Hall  in  Broadway,  the  Four- 
teenth Ward  Hotel,  and  the  Military  and  Civic  Hotel  in 
the  Bowery,  were  the  places  of  meeting  of  the  body  of 
the  Convention,  while  Garret  Gilbert's  house,  and  George 
W.  Mc'Pherson's  were  used  for  meetings  of  the  elite, 
and  the  offices  of  Dr.  Philip  E.  Milledoler  and  Havens 
and  Moore,  were  dedicated  to  caucus  meetings. 

We  shall  now  give  a  list  of  the  prominent  men  whom 
Leggett  imbued  with  his  "  agrarian  spirit  of  antirmo- 
nopoly."  They  might  be  called  his  disciples,  for  none  of 
them  had  qualifications  to  lead  the  Equal  Rights  De- 
mocracy. 

Philip  E.  Milledoler,  chairman  of  the  young  men's 
General  Committee  at  Tammany  Hall,  was  a  disappointed 
man,  and  sufficiently  malcontent  to  have  led  on  a  revolu- 
tion, but  for  his  constitutional  timidity.  Garrett  Gilbert, 
was  also  a  malcontent,  and  the  burden  of  most  of  his 


1835.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  17 

speeches  was,  "  Go  it  my  boys,  against  the  old  hunkers 
of  Tammany  Hall,  who  go  up  the  back  stairs."  At  the 
select  meetings  at  his  house,  he  was  regaled  with  being 
toasted  as  "  our  next  mayor."  Barnabas  Bates, — a  man 
of  considerable  politico-literary  ability,  always  gentle,  and 
always  self-sustained,  the  very  model  of  political  propriety. 
JohnMwaise — another  gentle  spirit  favorable  to  the  next 
mayoralty  of  Mr.  Gilbert.  Charles  G.  Havens  and 
Charles  B.  Moore,  who  had  caught  with  youthful  suscepti- 
bility a  scintillation  from  Leggett's  enthusiasm.  Wm.  F. 
Piatt,  a  man  of  general  abilities,  but  of  such  a  politi- 
cal idiosyncracy,  as  predisposes  him  to  catch  the  in- 
fection of  every  movement  professing  reform.  John  W. 
Vethake,  a  man  not  calculated  to  be  popular,  but  of  a 
very  philosophic  mind,  and  fertile  in  what  are  called  "  ab- 
stractions" in  religion,  politics  and  social  organization. 
John  Windt,  an  ultra  anti-monopolist,  who  would  indeed 
do  justice  to  the  Banks,  though  the  whole  credit  system 
should  fall.  No  man  has  made  more  efforts  as  an  indi- 
vidual in  behalf  of  what  he  considers  the  Equal  Rights  of 
humanity.  Jlllen  M.  Sniff  en,  superintendent  of  lamps 
and  gas,  was  peculiarly  timid  on  account  of  his  office. 
Alexander  Ming,  jr,  was  also  an  office-holder  with  a  large 
family,  but  his  open  independence  notwithstanding,  formed 
a  noble  contrast  to  the  cautiousness  of  Sniffen.  Ming 
had  more  of  the  onward  self-risking  spirit,  necessary  to  a 
popular  leader,  than  any  of  the  anti-monopolists ;  and  the 
reader  will  find  that  when  the  first  mighty  struggle  came, 
he  naturally  got  into  that  position.  Henry  E.  Riell,  also 
an  office-holder,  but  an  active  anti-monopolist  not  withstand- 
ing. Jacob  D.  Clute  was  a  member  of  the  Old  Men's, 
and  George  W.  McPherson  of  the  Young  Men's  General 
Committee,  where  each  stood  firm  to  the  cause  of  Equality 
of  Rights,  and  voted  like  good  and  true  men  in  behalf  of 
the  Evening  Post.  Benson  Milledoler,  Rodney  S.  Church, 
John  Commerford*  John  JL.  Riell,  and  Nathaniel  Smith, 
were  all  known  in  the  anti-monopoly  movement  of  1835 
2* 


18  HISTORY    OF   THE  [1835. 

While  secret  meetings  were  being  held  by  the  Equal 
Rights  Democracy — while  it  was  a  deplorable  fact  of  the 
times,  that  citizens  felt  it  at  all  necessary  to  meet  by 
stealth,  for  the  sake  of  their  simple  Constitutional  Rights ; 
while  numbers  were  so  overawed  by  the  monopoly  dynas- 
ty that  governed,  that  they  dared  not  meet  even  secretly, 
one  man  with  more  of  the  divinity  within  him,  than  any 
man  of  his  era,  stood  forth  almost  alone,  undaunted -by  all 
the  terrorism  of  the  monopoly  system.  With  all  the  gal- 
lantry of  ancient  chivalry,  he  counted  not  the  personal 
cost  to  himself,  but  openly  attacked  monopoly  of  every 
kind,  and  exposed  and  beat  down  the  sophistries  and  sub- 
terfuges of  the  Albany  Argus,  the  New  York  Times,  and 
the  prostituted  press  of  both  parties.  The  Washington 
Globe  beheld  the  extremity  of  its  political  associates,  and 
came  to  their  rescue,  in  the  most  effective  manner.  Leg- 
gett  published  in  the  Evening  Post  of  the  19th  of  Sept. 
1835,  an  extract  from  the  Globe,  which  he  justly  designat- 
ed as  his  ex-communication  from  the  Republican  Party. 
It  is  inserted  here,  that  the  reader  may  comprehend  the 
horrid  despotism  of  party,  under  the  regime  of  monopoly. 

{ '  The  Evening  Post  has  on  various  occasions  shown  a  disposition 
to  fly  off  from  the  Democratic  Party,  by  running  into  extremes. 
Upon  the  Tariff  it  knew  no  medium.  It  was  for  free  trade,  without 
reference  to  the  policy  of  other  nations.  In  regard  to  Banks,  no 
account  was  to  be  taken  of  the  actual  condition  of  things  in  the  coun- 
try, but  a  universal  and  immediate  annihilation,  was  the  tendency  of 
all  the  Post's  arguments.  The  spirit  of  Agrarianism  was  perceivable 
in  all  the  political  views  of  the  Editor,  and  seemed  as  if  he  was 
inclined  to  legislate  altogether  upon  abstractions,  and  allow  the  busi- 
ness of  the  world  and  the  state  of  society  to  have  nothing  to  do  with 
it.  This  Utopian  temper  in  the  Post  was  perpetually  running  its 
editor's  head  against  a  post — some  established  landmark  set  up  by 
the  experience  and  good  sense  of  the  people  to  designate  the  different 
interests  among  us,  and  the  principles  by  which  they  were  to  be  pro- 
tected. In  its  warfare  upon  the  settled  principles  of  Democracy,  the 
Post  has  ever  and  anon  found  itself  at  loggerheads  with  the  organs 


1835.]  LOCO-FOCO   PARTY.  19 

which  have  long  been  accustomed  to  reflect  the  public  sentiment. 
The  Richmond  Enquirer,  the  Albany  Argus,  and  other  standard  repub- 
lican prints,  have  been  successively  the  objects  of  its  attack.  Finally, 
the  Post,  as  if  eager  to  break  with  the  party  to  which  it  has  assmned 
to  be  devoted,  has  assailed  the  Secretary  of  the  Treasury,  the  Secre- 
tary of  the  Navy,  and  the  Post-Master  General.  All  this  might  pos- 
sibly be  set  down  to  individual  caprice — a  sort  of  innocent  ostenta- 
tion by  way  of  displaying  the  independence  of  the  editor.  But  he 
has  at  last,  and  we  are  glad  of  it,  taken  a  stand  which  must  forever 
separate  him  from  the  Democratic  Party.  His  journal  now  openly 
and  systematically  encourages  the  Abolitionists." 

Thus,  from  head-quarters  was  the  ban  of  ex-communi- 
cation fulminated,  and  the  hint  was  clearly  given  upon 
what  plea  the  ban  could  be  extended  throughout  the  em- 
pire of  the  party.  Accordingly,  on  the  tenth  of  October, 
the  Old  Men's  General  Committee  adopted  the  plea  and 
echoed  the  ex-communication.  But  as  regarded  Leggett's 
abolitionism,  could  not  the  "  oldest  and  wisest  of  the  par- 
ty" also  respond  with  the  Globe  "we  are  glad  of  it  too?" 
It  is  certain,  that  they  had  much  more  cause  of  dislike  and 
fear  of  his  "  agrarian  spirit"  in  regard  to  Banks,  than  to 
abolitionism.  The  first  was  near  at  hand  and  portentous 
to  themselves,  the  latter  remote  and  dangerous  only  to 
those  at  a  distance. 

In  the  mean  time  the  rank  and  file  of  the  Equal  Rights 
Democracy,  gave  evidence  of  increase  of  numbers,  and  at 
length  the  necessity  of  some  eclat  began  to  be  felt  by  the 
leaders,  in  order  to  increase  political  capital.  With  this 
view,  the  expedient  of  setting  up  a  dinner  in  honor  of 
R.  M.  Johnson,  was  adopted  as  a  master  piece  of  policy. 
We  shall  say  nothing  of  the  tremendous  importance  of  the 
arrangements  by  caucus,  nor  of  "  our  next  mayor's" 
claims  of  being  the  presiding  officer.  A  mayor  in  pos- 
session was  preferred  to  a  mayor  in  expectancy,  and  C. 
W.  Lawrence  was  chosen  President,  and  "  our  next 
mayor"  first  Vice  President.  The  dinner  went  off  admir- 
ably, the  regular  toasts  were  as  cautiously  couched  as 


20  HISTORY  OF  TflE  [1835. 

P.  E.  Milledoler  could  find  language,  without  any  of  the 
shocking  words  of  the  anti-monopoly  vocabulary.  But, 
two  of  the  regular  toasts  made  a  noiseless  cautious  ap- 
proach. One,  u  the  Right  of  Instruction  "  might  possibly 
have  been  intended  to  include  the  right  of  pledging  against 
monopolies,  as  had  been  done  the  previous  election.  Anoth- 
er, the  " Liberty  of  the  Press"  might  have  included  the 
liberty  taken  by  the  Evening  Post,  but  it  did  not  -say  so 
exactly.  However,  Theophilus  Fisk,  John  Windt  and 
M.  Jaques,  with  their  irregular  toasts,  made  up  for  the 
circuitous  approaches  of  the  regulars.  Fisk  went  directly 
at  "  Banks,  Banking  and  paper  money,  labor  saving  ma- 
chines by  which  drones  are  enabled  to  grow  rich  without 
honest  industry"  Windt  threw  in  his  "  Equal  Rights ; 
no  good  Democrat  will  ask  for  more,  and  no  true  Demo- 
crat will  be  satisfied  with  less."  These  were  followed  by 
Jaques'  toast,"  the  Rights  of  Man"  with  the  Jeffersonian 
doctrine  added  thereto.  These  men  bearded  the  Lion  of 
monopoly  in  his  den  at  Tammany  Hall ;  the  "Agrarian 
spirit  of  anti-monopoly"  was  naturally  in  them,  and  it 
would  have  utterance. 

C.  C.  Cambreleng  made  an  excellent  speech,  not  only 
going  the  right  of  instruction  in  the  usual  acceptance,  but 
also  the  right  of  pledging  candidates.  The  Johnson  din- 
ner was  quite  satisfactory  to  the  anti-monopoly  democracy. 

About  this  time,  a  pamphlet  was  published  entitled  the 
"  Doctrine  of  anti-monopoly,  in  an  address  to  the  Demo- 
cracy of  the  city  of  New  York."  Its  author,  John  W. 
Vethake,  evinced  considerable  originality  both  in  the 
mode  of  viewing  and  explaining  the  subject.  This  ad- 
dress was  stereotyped — printed  also  in  the  Evening  Post, 
and  extensively  circulated.  Thenceforward  the  meetings 
of  the  Equal  Rights  Democracy  became  more  open,  more 
crowded  and  more  exciting.  In  short,  the  tendency 
towards  that  most  horrid  of  party  horrors,  designated  by 
one  little  word, "  a  split,"  became  every  day  more  evident. 

The  monopoly  democracy,  according  to  the  "  known 


1835.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  21 

usages"  of  the  Republican  Party,  held  its  Ward  meetings 
to  elect  delegates  for  the  Nominating  Committee  at  Tam- 
many Hall.  At  these  Ward  meetings  it  was  decided  by 
clear  majorities,  not  to  pledge  the  candidates  for  Congress 
and  the  Legislature  of  the  State,  as  had  been  done  the 
previous  year,  against  monopolies.  Thus  instructed,  the 
delegates  met  according  to  usage,  and  in  the  last  week  of 
October  completed  the  ticket  as  follows. 

For  Congress,          Gideon  Lee. 
For  Senator,  Henry  F.  Jones. 

For  Assembly. 

Prosper  M.  Wetmore,       Benjamin  Ringgold, 
Charles  P.  Clinch,  Francis  B.  Cutting, 

Thomas  Herttell,  John  I.  Morgan, 

George  Sharpe,  Peter  A.  Cowdrey, 

t   Ezra  S.  Conner,  George  Seaman, 

Jesse  West. 

The  indications  were  now  sufficiently  plain  that  the  Re- 
publican Party  had  become  a  monopoly  aristocratic  party. 
It  became  obligatory  on  the  Equal  Rights  Democrats  to 
stand  by  their  great  leading  principle,  or  to  abandon  it 
altogether.  To  go  the  whole  length  either  way,  was  not 
agreeable  to  the  majority  of  the  prominent  men,  who 
were  not  distinguished  for  great  decision  of  character ; — 
but  to  go  nearly  half  way,  was  to  hit  the  medium  point 
which  medium  men  strive  to  arrive  at.  Accordingly,  the 
ticket  of  the  monopoly  Republican  Party  was  duly  taken 
into  consideration,  and,  at  meetings  of  the  Equal  Rights 
Democracy,  it  was  concluded  on  to  strike  off  five  of  the 
candidates,  viz :  Lee,  Ringgold,  Sharpe,  West  and  Con- 
ner, and  to  attend  the  General  County  meeting  at  Tam- 
many Hall  and  substitute  the  following  in  their  stead,  viz : 
Charles  G.  Ferris,/or  Congress,  and  Job  Haskell,  John  W. 
Vethake,  Rodney  S.  Church,  and  John  Windt/br  Assembly. 


22  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1835. 

Charles  G.  Ferris,  nominated  for  Congress  by  the  Equal 
Rights  Democracy,  had  been  member  of  Congress  the 
preceding  year,  having  been  elected  to  fill  the  vacancy 
occasioned  by  the  election  of  C.  W.  Lawrence  to  the 
Mayoralty  of  the  city  of  New  York.  Mr.  Ferris,  while 
in  Congress,  had  given  satisfaction  to  his  constituents,  but 
he  was  dropped  by  the  leading  men  of  the  Republican 
Party,  because  Gideon  Lee  was  a  greater  favorite  and 
more  in  their  confidence  :  in  fact,  he  was  one  of  the  head 
men  of  the  leading  department  of  the  old  regime  itself. 
Mr.  Ferris  is  a  man  of  kind  unostentatious  manners,  of 
good  abilities,  but  rather  indolent  in  the  use  of  them.  He 
is  naturally  a  Democrat  in  his  intercourse  with  men,  and 
above  all,  he  has  one  virtue  not  too  common  among  poli- 
ticians, a  sincere  regard  for  truth  and  for  his  engagements. 

Job  Haskell  had  been  a  member  of  the  house  of  Assem- 
bly for  the  session  of  1835,  and  voted  more  strictly  to  the 
pledge  he  signed,  than  any  of  his  colleagues  from  the  city. 
Many  a  time  during  the  session,  was  he  in  the  glorious 
minority  of  exactly  one.  But  he  adhered  with  the  inflexi- 
bility of  hardened  steel  to  his  pledge,  both  to  the  letter 
and  the  spirit  of  it.  Honest  Job  !  He  had  [served  *his 
country  in  the  last  war,  and  did  not  he  love  to  talk  of 
fighting  the  British  ?  Besides,  his  speeches  gave  evidence 
of  his  reading  in  military  lore,  and  of  his  estimation  of 
Generals  Hannibal,  Scipio,  Alexander,  Cesar,  Bonaparte, 
Washington,  Jackson  and  Harrison. 

The  memorable  29th  of  October,  1835,  was  drawing 
near,  yet  the  encampments  of  the  two  democracies,  that 
of  monopoly,  and  that  of  Equal  Rights,  appeared  to  be 
undisturbed.  But  where  was  he,  the  fearless  knight  errant 
of  humanity  1 — Where  was  William  Legett,  the  herald  of 
truth  ?  He  had  been  beset  on  all  sides,  until  the  over- 
tasked man  was  exhausted  by  super-human  exertion  and 
he  lay  prostrate  on  the  bed  of  disease.  The  Evening  Post 
was  bereft  of  the  mighty  spirit  which  gave  it  power  over 
men's  minds,  and  it  seemed  as  if  the  sun  was  standing 


1835.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  23 

still  in  the  political  world.  So  deep  and  intense  was  the 
interest  felt  by  the  friends  of  Equal  Rights  in  behalf  of 
the  champion  of  the  cause,  that  it  threw  an  aspect  of 
solemnity  over  their  councils,  which  perhaps  induced  more 
caution  in  their  preparations,  and  the  more  necessity  for 
reliance  on  themselves  in  the  approaching  contest.  Even 
the  scheme  of  going  to  the  county  meeting  at  Tammany 
Hall  with  Loco  Foco  matches,  and  candles,  which  in  other 
circumstances  would  have  excited  merriment,  was  resolv- 
ed on  in  serious  earnestness  of  mind  and  somewhat  of 
solemn  mystery. 

At  length  the  evening  of  the  29th  October  is  come,  on 
which  the  Democratic  Republican  Electors  of  the  city  of 
New  York  are  to  assemble  in  Tammany  Hall,  to  decide  on 
the  nominations  of  their  agents,  into  whose  hands  they 
have  foolishly  confided  their  political  right  of  conscience, 
as  regards  the  right  of  suffrage.  There  is  a  dense  throng 
collecting  in  front  of  the  hall,  and  the  leading  passage 
and  great  stair  way  to  the  large  room,  is  crowded  to  a 
perfect  jam,  as  if  human  beings  were  wedged  together 
and  bound  fast.  Already  those  at  the  head  of  the  stairs, 
hear  the  tramp  of  persons  in  the  room.  How  comes  that  ? 
Know  you  not,  questioner,  that  there  are  back  stairs,  and 
that  up  those  back  stairs  the  caucussed  officers  with  the 
caucussed  proceedings,  (for  the  democracy  must  not  be  left 
to  do  its  duty  to  itself),  have  ascended  into  the  room  ?  But 
in  order  that  you  may  have  a  clear  knowledge  of  the 
mode  of  doing  business  under  the  regime  of  the  time  hon- 
ored usages  in  times  gone  by,  the  following  is  quoted  from 
a  sagacious  politician.* 

"  On  every  political  occasion,  a  caucus  composed  of 
the  "  oldest  and  wisest"  is  convened  in  anticipation  of 
any  announcement  to  the  people.  These  obliging  and 
immaculate  sages,  with  the  most  paternal  and  disinterest- 
ed motives,  consult  and  exchange  opinions  with  each 
other  on  the  course  necessary  to  be  pursued  for  the  good 

*  Democrat,  Sept.  5th,  1836. 


24  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1835. 

of  the  whole.  Once  decided  upon,  the  wires  are  put  in 
motion.  If  in  New  York,  the  Tammany  Society,  a  secret 
and  select  one  by  the  by,  commences  it  operations ;  the 
Ward  leaders  have  a  private  interview,  and  decide  upon 
the  chairman,  the  secretary  and  the  retiring  committee ; 
the  office-holders  receive  their  instructions  to  be  present 
with  their  dependents,  and  a  call  is  finally  published  for 
the  independent  Democratic  Republican  electors  to  meet 
and  transact  the  business.  On  the  allotted  evening  the 
people  assemble ;  the  trained  troops,  punctual  to  the 
minute,  nominate  and  elect  the  officers ;  the  trained  chair- 
man cannot  hear  any  names  but  those  of  the  trained  com- 
mittee ;  who  in  turn  make  a  trained  report ;  the  trained 
secretary  is  ordered  to  publish  the  trained  proceedings  in 
the  official  trained  newspapers,  and  the  untrained  people 
are  then  permitted  to  go  home." 

So  much  for  the  Ward  meetings  ;  we  shall  quote  from 
the  same  author  on  county  meetings. 

"  Everything  being  arranged,  the  sovereign  people  are 
again  called  upon  to  approve  or  disapprove  the  acts  of 
their  nominating  (appointing)  committee.  At  the  hour 
named,  the  doors  of  the  great  room  are  opened  from  the 
inside,  to  the  congregated  hundreds  on  the  outside ; — 
when  lo !  the  actors  by  some  secret  passage  are  already 
on  the  stage  and  perfect  in  their  parts.  Order  being  par- 
tially obtained,  the  tickets  are  read,  the  vote  is  taken  and 
declared  in  the  affirmative ;  the  farce  is  over,  the  meet- 
ing is  adjourned,  and  the  "  regular  ticket"  is  announced 
next  day  to  those  who  always  submit  to  the  majority,  and 
never  vote  any  other." 

The  dock  has  just  struck  seven,  and  the  doors  of  Tam- 
many Hall  are  opening  for  the  democracy.  What  a  mass 
of  human  beings  rush  forward  into  the  room !  Yet  they 
are  late,  for  George  D.  Strong*  who  came  up  the  back 
stairs,  has  already  nominated  Isaac  L.  Varianfi  who  also 
ascended  by  the  same  way,  for  the  chair,  and  the'  latter 

*  President  of  Commercial  Bank,    f  A  Bank  Director. 


1835.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  25 

is  hastening  towards  it  before  the  question  is  heard  by  a 
fifth  part  of  the  crowd.  Joel  Curtis  is  nominated  as  the 
room  is  filling  up,  and  the  loud  "  aye "  of  the  Equal 
Rights  Democracy  calls  him  to  the  chair.  The  honest 
workingman  approaches  it,  and  now  begins  the  contest 
between  monopoly  and  its  opponents.  There  is  a  strug- 
gle of  gladiators  on  the  platform  around  the  chair; — the 
loudest  vociferations  are  heard,  and  Tammany  trembles 
with  intestine  war.  The  contest  at  length  becomes  more 
furious;  men  are  struggling  with  each  other  as  if  for 
empire,  while  the  multitude  in  the  body  of  the  room  are 
like  the  waves  of  a  tempestuous  sea.  But  who  is  he, 
that  man  of  slender  form  and  youthful  appearance,  the 
foremost  in  the  struggle  ?  Equal  Rights  men,  your  chief 
should  be  a  man  of  stalwart  frame ;  but  there  is  hope,  for 
your  cause  is  good,  and  the  indomitable  spirit  of  equality 
is  in  that  slender  man.  "  Cheers  for  Ming !" — What ! 
is  that  the  office-holder  ?  He  who  is  always  up  with 
every  rising  of  the  people  1  He  openly  dares  the  majesty 
of  monopoly,  even  in  its  temple ; — he  disregards  the 
tenure  of  his  office,  for  the  elevating  principle  of  Equality 
of  Rights — the  honest  war-cry  of  "  opposition  to  all  mo- 
nopolies "  have  aroused  the  democratic  enthusiasm  of  his 
heart,  and  he  counts  not  the  cost.  It  is  so ! — he  is  un- 
consciously, for  the  occasion,  and  the  time  being,  the 
natural  hero  of  humanity,  striving  with  all  his  energy  of 
character  to  place  Joel  Curtis  in  the  chair,  as  the  repre- 
sentative of  the  masses.  Unquestionably  it  is  a  contest 
for  empire  between  man  and  monopoly. 

Behold !  a  broad  banner  is  spread  before  the  eyes  of 
the  vast  assemblage,  and  all  can  read  its  inscription  : 
"Joel  Curtis,  the  Anti-Monopolist  chairman." 

The  efforts  of  Isaac  L.  Varian  and  the  monopoly  de- 
mocracy are  futile  to  obtain  order,  or  to  read  their  ticket 
of  nominations  so  as  to  be  heard,  or  any  decision  had 
thereon.  They  are  struck  with  amazement  at  the  sight 
of  another  banner  with  the  inscription  "  Anti- Monopolist 
3 


26  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1835. 

Democrats  are  opposed  to  Gideon  Lee*  Ringgold,  West, 
and  Conner  ;f"  and  another  with  "  We  go  all  gold  but 
Ringgold"  What  a  desecration  of  the  usages  ! 

But  behold — there  is  the  broadest  banner  of  all,  and  it 
is  greeted  with  cheers.  It  is  the  whole  of  the  anti- 
monopoly  ticket  for  Congress  and  the  Legislature,  so  that 
all  can  see  and  read  where  none  can  distinctly  hear. 
The  shouts  of  the  Equal  Rights'  Democracy  are  still  more 
deafening.  But  heartfelt  cheers  are  given  to  that  ban- 
ner which  declares  for  Leggett :  "  The  Times  must  change 
ere  we  desert  our  Post." 

The  struggle  is  drawing  towards  a  close.  Isaac  L. 
Varian  believes  the  evidence  presented  to  his  senses,  and 
in  attempting  to  leave  the  chair,  to  which  he  is  forcibly 
held  down  by  George  D.  Strong  and  a  member  of  the 
Common  Council  since  dead,  he  exclaims,  "  Let  me  get 
out,  gentlemen,  we  are  in  the  minority  here !"  They 
held  him  fast ; — but  there  !  the  chair  is  upset,  and  Isaac 
L.  Varian  is  thrown  from  it.  Instantly  Joel  Curtis,  the 
true-hearted  workingman  is  in  it,  both  by  right  and  fact, 
while  two  banners  speak  to  the  democracy,  "  Don't  ad- 
journ"— "  Sustain  the  chair."  There  is  clapping  of 
hands  and  triumphant  cheers.  What  can  the  discomfited 
do? 

They  have  done  it.  When  they  got  down  stairs  they 
turned  off  the  gas.  It  is  half-past  seven,  and  the  dark- 
ness of  midnight  is  in  Tammany  Hall.  Nothing  but  the 
demon  spirit  of  monopoly,  in  its  war  upon  humanity, 
could  have  been  wicked  enough  to  involve  such  an  ex- 
cited throng  in  total  darkness. 

"  Let  there  be  light,  and  there  is  light !"  A  host  of 
fire-fly  lights  are  in  the  room — loco-foco  matches  are 
ignited,  candles  are  lit,  and  they  are  held  up  by  living 
and  breathing  chandeliers.  It  is  a  glorious  illumination ! 
There  are  loud  and  long  plaudits  and  huzzas,  such  as 
Tammany  never  before  echoed  from  its  foundations. 

*  President  of  Leather  Manufacturers5  Bank,    f  Bank  partizans. 


1835.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  27 


Reader,  if  this  were  not  a  victory  over  Monopoly,  a  blow, 
at  least,  was  struck  upon  the  hydra-headed  monster, 
from  which  it  never  recovered. 

The  anti-monopoly  ticket  was  enthusiastically  adopted 
by  the  apparently  undiminished  multitude.  Resolutions 
of  the  same  character  were  passed,  from  which  we  select 
the  following : 

"  Resolved — That,  in  a  free  state,  all  distinctions  but  those  of  merit 
are  odious  and  oppressive,  and  ought  to  be  discouraged  by  a  people 
jealous  of  their  liberties. 

.  «  Resolved — That  all  laws  which  directly  or  indirectly  infringe  the 
free  exercise  and  enjoyment  of  equal  rights  and  privileges  by  the  great 
body  of  the  people,  are  odious,  unjust,  and  unconstitutional  in  their 
nature  and  effect,  and  ought  to  be  abolished. 

"  Resolved — For  all  amounts  of  money,  gold  and  silver  are  the  only 
legitimate,  substantial,  and  proper,  circulating  medium  of  our  country. 

"  Resolved — That  perpetuities  and  monopolies  are  offensive  to  free- 
dom, contrary  to  the  genius  and  spirit  of  a  free  state  and  the  principles 
of  commerce,  and  ought  not  to  be  allowed. 

"  Resolved — That  we  are  in  favor  of  a  strict  construction  of  the 
Constitution  of  the  United  States,  and  we  are  therefore  opposed  to 
the  United  States  Bank,  as  being  unconstitutional  and  opposed  to  the 
genius  and  spirit  of  our  democratic  institutions,  and  subversive  of 
the  great  and  fundamental  principles  of  equal  rights  and  privileges, 
asserted  in  the  charter  of  our  liberties. 

"  Resolved — That  we  are  opposed  to  all  bank  charters  granted  by 
individual  states,  because  we  believe  them  founded  on,  and  as  giving 
an  impulse  to  principles  of  speculation  and  gambling,  at  war  with 
good  morals  and  just  and  equal  government,  and  calculated  to  build 
up  and  strengthen  in  our  country  the  odious  distribution  of  wealth 
and  power  against  merit  and  equal  rights;  and  every  good  citizen  is 
bound  to  war  against  them  as  he  values  the  blessings  of  free  govern- 
ment. 

"  Resolved — That  we  receive  the  Evening  Post  with  open  arms  to 
the  bosom  of  the  Democratic  family,  and  that  the  efforts  of  its  talented 
editors  must  and  shall  receive  our  uncompromising  support." 

The  other  resolutions  were  in  favor  of  the  policy  of 
Andrew  Jackson's  administration — Of  giving  the  election 
of  President  and  Vice  President  to  the  direct  vote  of  the 
people — Of  the  one  presidential  term — Short  terms  of  all 
offices,  and  strict  responsibility  to  the  people — The  right 
of  instruction — The  Baltimore  Convention  nominations, 
and  the  an ti- monopoly  ticket,  headed  C.  G.  Ferris  for 
Congress,  and  Thomas  Herttell  for  Assembly. 


28  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1835. 

"  After  the  adoption  of  the  resolutions,  a  motion  was 
carried  that  the  meeting  adjourn  to  the  street,  in  front  of 
the  Hall,  and  form  a  procession,  with  their  anti-monopoly 
banners,  flags,  &c.  This  was  accordingly  done,  and 
some  thousands  of  the  meeting,  bearing  torches,  candles, 
&c.,  marched  up  the  Bowery,  cheering  their  democratic 
fellow-citizens  on  the  way,  and  halted  in  front  of  the 
Military  and  Civic  Hotel,  corner  of  Broome  Street-,  and 
after  giving  nine  hearty  cheers,  adjourned  to  their  respect- 
ive homes." 


CHAPTER   II. 

The  Whig  Press — The  anti-Monopolists  are  called  Loco-Focos — 
Abusive  epithets  of  the  New  York  Times — Party  discipline — 
Edict  of  the  Sachems — Young  Men's  General  Committee — Votes 
on  Evening  Post  and  Anti-Monopoly  ticket — Old  Men's  General 
Committee — Remarks — Leggett's  insanity — Reflections  on  his  bust 
in  Tammany  Hall — Result  of  General  Election — Defections — 
Meeting  of  anti-Monopolists — Proceedings — Convention — Barna- 
bas Bates — Separate  organization  and  compromise — Result  of 
Committee  elections — Resolutions  of  independence  of  Tammany — 
County  Convention — Plan  of  separate  organization — Proceedings 
and  Resolutions — Declaration  of  principles,  and  sketch  of  Moses 
Jaques. 


The  present  may  be  truly  said  to  be  a  time  that  tries  men's  principles. 

M.  J  \QUES. 

THE  morning  of  the  30th  of  October,  1835,  was  a 
joyous  one  to  the  readers  of  the  Whig  press  in  the  city. 
Descriptions,  both  grave  and  ridiculous,  were  given  of 
the  scene  of  the  previous  evening  in  Tammany  Hall,  and 
great  were  the  exultations  over  the  divisions  in  the  ranks 
of  the  Democracy.  The  Courier  and  Enquirer  took  the 
lead  in  this  labor  of  love,  and  bedubbed  the  anti-monopo- 
lists with  the  name  of  Loco-Focos.  But  the  Whig  press, 
true  to  its  natural  dislike  of  real  democracy,  took  sides 
with  the  monopolists ;  at  least  so  far  as  to  abuse  the 


1835  ]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  29 

friends  of  Equal  Rights  without  stint  or  conscience.  On 
the  other  side,  the  New  York  Times,  the  cherished  organ 
of  the  oldest  and  wisest  of  the  monopoly  Democracy,  lifts 
up  its  voice  in  mingled  tones  of  shame,  chagrin,  and 
denunciation.  Thenceforward  it  poured  its  fountains  of 
wrath — of  bile  and  bitterness — upon  the  Evening  Post, 
Charles  G.  Ferris,  Alexander  Ming,  Jr.,  John  W.  Veth- 
ake,  Job  Haskell,  Henry  E.  Rielf,  Rodney  S.  Church, 
and  John  Windt.  But  this  was  not  all ;  for  it  undertook 
the  Herculean  task  of  castigating  the  whole  of  the  Equal 
Rights  democracy.  That  the  reader  may  be  enabled  to 
form  some  idea  of  the  glorious  feats  of  this  protege  of  the 
"  thirty- six  fathers,"  its  epithets  are  extracted,  leaving 
the  imagination  to  supply  the  context,  which  was  equally 
classic,  moral  and  instructive.  "  Disorganize™  " — "  In- 
truders "  —  "  Revolters  "  —  "  Agrarians  "  —  "  Working 
Men's  faction7' — "Rowdies" — "  Odds  and  ends  of  ex- 
tinct party  " — "Eleventh  hour  Democrats" — "  Sweepings 
and  remnants  of  all  recent  factions  " — "  Renegade  anti- 
Masons  "  —  "  Pests  of  party  "  —  "  Bad  factionists  " — 
"  Fanny  Wright  Men"—"  Noisy  Brawlers  "—"  Political 
nuisances  " — "  Loco  Foco  party  " — "  Carbonari  " — "  Infi- 
dels " — "  Pledge  spouters  " — "  Resolution  mongers  " — 
"  Small  fry  of  small  politicians  " — "  Sm.aU  lights  " — 
"Fire  flies  of  faction" — "  Unclean  Birds" — "Jack  o? 
Lanterns  who  shine  in  an  unhealthy  atmosphere  " — 
"  Noisy  discontented  politicians  " — "  Scum  of  politics  " 
—"Knaves"— "Political  cheats  and  swindlers"— "  The 
Guy  Fawkes'  of  politics  "  !  !  ! 

Such  was  the  language  of  the  organ  of  the  aristocracy 
of  the  Democracy.  In  fact  such  contemptuous  terms 
can  only  proceed  from  the  sentiment  of  aristocracy.  He 
who  cherishes  the  principle  of  equality,  has  no  ideas  to 
generate  such  terms  of  contempt  for  his  fellow-men. 

Meanwhile  the  leaders  of  the  Monopoly  Democracy 

went  energetically  to  work,  as  there  was  no  time  to 

spare,   and  the  discipline   of  "  the  party"  organization 

was  at  once  enforced.     In  the  first  place,  the  name  of 

2* 


30  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1835. 

Isaac  L.  Varian  was  published  to  nominations  which  had 
not  been  adopted  by  the  majority  present,  and  to  resolu- 
tions which  had  not  been  carried ;  yet  he  suffered  these 
matters  to  go  forth  to  the  world  without  contradiction  ! !  !* 
In  the  next  place,  the  Sachems  of  the  Tammany  Society 
published  their  mendacious  edict  declaring  that  the  ticket 
headed  Gideon  Lee  for  Congress,  was  the  regularly  nomi- 
nated ticket,  and  the  Assembly  ticket  headed  John  I. 
Morgan,  was  of  the  same  authority ;  and  that  those 
tickets  only  would  be  permitted  to  be  distributed  at  Tam- 
many Hall  during  the  election. 

How  the  Democratic  Republican  Party  can  suffer  to 
nestle  within  its  very  midst,  a  secret  political  society,  a 
nursery  of  office  seekers,  to  dictate  upon  any  matter  of 
importance,  or  to  declare  who  are,  or  who  are  not  the 
proper  candidates  of  the  party,  is  truly  astonishing  ! 

The  third  movement  called  the  Young  Men's  General 
Committee  together,  for  it  was  in  this  body  that  Leg- 
gett's  "  agrarian  spirit  of  anti-monopoly"  had  made  some 
inroads.  Therefore,  in  order  to  enforce  discipline  and 
subordination,  the  following  resolution  was  offered  by 
Dr.  William  Rockwell.f 

"  Resolved — That  the  Democratic  Republican  Young  Men's  Gene- 
ral Committee  no  longer  recognize  the  Evening  Post  as  one  of  the 
organs  of  the  Republican  Party,  and  that  in  future,  no  notices 
emanating  from  this  Committee,  be  published  in  that  paper. 

Affirmative.  Robert  Smith,  Jacob  T.  Kent,  John  W. 
Hyatt,  S.  Townsend  Lawrence,  Abraham  Van  Ness, 
Alfred  S.  Frazier, Philip  S.  Crooke,  Stephen  Paret,  Corne- 
lius H.  Bryson,  A.  J.  Bleecker,  Abraham  Lefoy,  John 

*  Aristocracy  ever  gratefully  remembers  those  who  make  personal 
sacrifices  to  its  interest.  Isaac  L,  Varian  was  a  competitor  with  Wil- 
liam Leggett  in  1838,  for  nomination  as  candidate  for  Congress,  and 
he  triumphed  over  Leggett !  This  was  not  all,  for  he  was  raised  to 
the  dignity  of  Mayor  of  the  city  of  New  York,  and  he  is  now  Senator 
of  the  State  !  !  ! 

f  Dr.  Rockwell  was  afterwards  made  Health  Officer,  wort 
$10,000  dollars  a  year. 


1835.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  31 

A.  Morrill,  Thomas  A.  Brady,  John  McKinley,  Wm. 
Rockwell,  Wm.  M.   Fish,  John  J.  Bedient,  James  H. 
Rogers,  Leonard  Lee,  Thomas  Lloyd,  James  McMillen, 
L.  P.  Jordan,  Charles  B.  Tappan,  Joseph  Isaacs,  Davtf 
M.  Cowdrey,  Eber  Wheaton,  Paschal  Bertine,  Francis 

B.  Fitch,  John  M.  Wheeler,  Wm.  M.  Summers,  Wm.  J. 
Brown,   Thomas  Dolan,  John   Crygier,  James   A.   M. 
Gardner,   Jesse   Cady,   Charles  J.  Dodge,  Richard   H. 
Colfax. 

Negative.  Charles  B.  Moore,  Henry  E.  Riell,  P.  E. 
Milledoler,  G.  W.  McPherson,  Charles  Taylor,  E.  G 
Sweet,  H.  S.  Meeks,  Nathan  Darling. 

Another  test  resolution  was  offered,  that  the  tickets 
headed  Gideon  Lee  and  John  I.  Morgan  were  the  regu- 
larly nominated.  To  this  there  were  only  four  negatives, 
Riell,  McPherson,  Taylor  and  Sweet. 

The  Old  Men's  General  Committee  endorsed  the  same 
nominations,  and  the  Ward  Committees  and  meetings 
followed  in  the  rear.  Party  attachments  were,  appealed 
to,  the  ligatures  of  self-interest  were  drawn  tight,  and 
fears  of  extrusion  from  the  party  were  awakened.  Many 
of  the  anti-monopolists  began  to  lose  a  portion  of  their 
enthusiasm  for  principle,  when  brought  in  conflict  with 
party  attachments.  Others  flattered  themselves  that  they 
were  in  the  advance  of  their  fellow-citizens,  and  that  they 
had  better  remain  quiet  in  the  Monopoly  Democracy 
until  it  became  as  far  advanced  and  enlightened  as  them- 
selves. In  short,  the  fate  of  Mr.  Leggett  was  a  warning 
to  all  Reformers  not  to  set  themselves  against  "  the 
party."  He  was  denounced  by  nearly  all  the  Demo- 
cratic press,  and  considered  by  most  of  the  old  and  sensi- 
ble men  in  the  party,  as  in  a  state  of  insanity,  for  no  sane 
man  would  go  to  such  extremes  as  he  did.  The  leading 
men — the  majority  in  every  committee — the  majority  of 
the  party,  had  declared  themselves  against  him,  and  he 
was  confined  by  severe  indisposition  and  not  expected  to 
live. 

Reader  !  were  you  to  go  into  the  General  Committee 


32  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1835, 

room  in  Tammany  Hall  at  this  period  of  time,  1842,  you 
would  see  a  handsome  cast  in  plaister  of  Paris,  the  bust 
of  William  Leggett,  gracing  the  very  room  where  he  was 
denounced  seven  years  ago.  Would  you  moralize  upon 
changes  in  politics,  and  upon  that  class  of  men  the  most 
changeable,  politicians,  here  is  "  ample  space  and  verge 
enough."  The  very  insanity  imputed  to  him — the  "  agra- 
rian spirit  of  anti-monopoly"  for  which  he  was  persecuted 
unto  the  death,  now  pervades  the  party  which  persecuted 
him.  The  committee — the  leaders — the  Globe — the 
Argus — all,  all  are  now  in  his  condition  of  insanity, 
thoroughly  imbued  with  his  "  agrarian  spirit  of  anti- 
monopoly."  But  it  is  only  politicians  who  "  play  such 
fantastic  tricks  before  high  heaven." 

The  general  election  of  1835,  resulted  in  the  success 
of  the  monopoly  ticket  of  Lee  for  Congress,  and  the 
entire  ticket  headed  Morgan  for  the  Assembly ;  conse- 
quently, the  Whig  ticket,  as  well  as  the  Anti-monopoly 
ticket,  was  defeated.  This  result,  with  the  enforcements 
of  party  discipline  already  mentioned,  caused  numerous 
defections  from  the  Equal  Rights  Democracy.  Even 
some  of  those  who  undertook  to  lead  the  whirlwind  and 
direct  the  storm,  but  who  were  not  possessed  of  heroism 
to  do  so,  now  ingloriously  deserted,  went  back  to  Tam- 
many as  noiselessly  as  possible,  and  left  the  storm  of 
anti-monopoly  to  take  care  of  itself. 

The  vote  given  to  Charles  G.  Ferris,  the  anti-monopoly 
candidate  for  Congress,  was  over  four  thousand.  Mo- 
nopoly triumphed  in  the  election,  but  its  opponents  were 
not  subdued.  A  meeting  was  held  on  the  12th  Novem- 
ber to  collect  their  force  and  determine  their  future 
action.  Nathaniel  Smith  presided,  assisted  by  two  vice 
presidents  and  two  secretaries.  This  meeting  was  large; 
from  its  proceedings  the  following  selections  are  given  : 

"  Resolved — That  we  recommend  that  assemblies  of  Democrats 
opposed  to  monopolies  and  special  legislation,  be  formed  in  each 
ward  of  this  city,  of  such  persons  as  may  be  willing  to  enroll  them- 
selves for  that  purpose  ;  and  that  such  assemblies  shall  meet  in  their 
several  wards,  on  the  first  Monday  in  each  month. 


1835.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  33 

"  Resolved — that  the  several  ward  assemblies  be  requested  to  con- 
vene in  a  general  meeting  on  the  second  Monday  in  every  month,  &c. 

"  Your  committee  in  introducing  the  above  resolutions  do  not  intend 
to  institute  a  new  party,  but  to  form  a  union  with  those  of  their  fel- 
low-citizens whose  political  principles  are  truly  Democratic,  and  in 
accordance  with  those  of  Thomas  Jefferson,  Andrew  Jackson,  and  the 
friends  of  the  present  administration,  but  particularly  with  those  who 
are  opposed  to  monopolies." 

The  following  resolution  in  relation  to  Mr.  Leggett  is 
strongly  expressed : 

Resolved — that  the  course  pursued  by  the  majority  of  the  Old  and 
Young  Men's  General  Committee,  in  proscribing  the  Evening  Post, 
excites  in  us  emotions  of  unutterable  contempt  and  indignation,  and 
that  the  dastardly  conduct  of  the  Young  Men's  Commmittee,  in 
assailing  that  paper,  when  its  powerful  and  talented  editor  was  pros- 
trated by  sickness,  is  unparalleled  for  its  meanness  and  cowardice, 
and  deserves  the  solemn  condemnation  of  every  friend  of  the  liberty 
of  speech  and  of  the  press." 

The  following  announcement  appeared  in  the  Evening 
Post,  November  20th : 

"Mr.  Leggett  being  entirely  out  of  danger,  and  gradually,  but 
surely  convalescent,  the  temporary  arrangement  made  as  to  the  edito- 
rial department  of  this  journal  is,  from  and  after  this  date,  discon- 
tinued." 

He  did  not,  however,  resume  his  labors  until  the  9th 
December. 

But,  notwithstanding  the  disclaimer  of  instituting  a  new 
party  by  the  committee  of  the  meeting  on  the  12th  No- 
vember, yet  many  of  the  Equal  Rights  Democracy  were 
in  favor  of  such  a  step.  The  ultraists  in  the  rank  and 
file,  were  not  only  opposed  to  the  political  course  of  "  the 
party"  in  sustaining  monopolies,  but  they  were  also  hos- 
tile to  that  system  of  management  called  the  "  usages  of 
the  party,"  with  its  general  and  nominating  committees, 
and  they  were  desirous  of  a  more  popular  mode  of  nomi- 
nating candidates  for  the  suffrage  of  the  people.  They 
saw,  that  the  Tammany  Society,  with  many  of  its  mem- 
bers holding  office — the  General  Committees  and  the 
Nominating  Committees — all  in  connection,  constituted  a 
u  regular"  system  of  machinery,  which,  while  it  regu- 


34  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1835, 

lated  and  directed  the  movements  of  the  Democracy,  was 
nevertheless  governed  by  aristocratic  or  incorporated 
influences  behind  the  throne,  greater  than  the  sovereignty 
itself.  Besides  these  radical  objections  to  the  usages,  the 
Ultra  Democrats  were  taunted  by  the  supporters  of  Mo- 
nopoly ;  "  You  can't  prevail  against  Old  Tammany ;" 
"  We  are  glad  we  have  got  rid  of  you,  and  we  don't 
want  you  to  come  back  to  us ;"  "  It  was  an  evil  day 
when  the  Workingman's  faction  was  allowed  to  join  us ;" 
"  We  rejoice  that  we  are  now  fully  relieved  from  the 
connection ;"  "  The  party  could  not  prosper  until  such 
intruders  were  expelled  and  our  ancient  usages  restored  to 
their  proper  and  wonted  authority."  "  Old  fashioned  Demo- 
crats do  not  want  Loco-Focos  among  them  with  new-fan- 
gled notions  of  Democracy  ;"  "We  don't  want  Agrarians  in 
our  ranks, — men,  who  because  they  have  nothing,  want 
to  divide  other  people's  property,  and  to  break  down  those 
institutions  to  which  we  are  indebted  for  all  our  unexam- 
pled prosperity." 

To  the  honest  and  true  men  •  engaged  in  the  anti- 
monopoly  movement,  or  revolt,  it  was  out  of  the  question 
to  stand  still,  or  to  return  to  Tammany  Republicanism 
under  such  circumstances  of  subjection  and  insult.  Some- 
thing must  be  done,  for  it  was  clear  their  course  was  on- 
ward— how  could  it  be  otherwise  ?  A  body  of  delegates 
met  from  most  of  the  wards,  by  tacit  consent,  to  take 
their  future  course  into  consideration.  Matters  were 
talked  over  without  coming  to  any  conclusion,  save  the 
appointment  of  a  committee  to  draft  a  report  for  the 
next  meeting.  When  the  latter  meeting  was  held,  F. 
Byrdsall,  of  the  committee,  submitted  a  plan  of  separate 
organization,  but  Barnabas  Bates  objected  to  it  on  the 
ground  of  its  containing  "  too  much  creed."  The  report, 
or  rather  the  subject  it  related  to,  was  very  faintly  dis- 
cussed, for  there  was  evidently  an  abatement  of  enthu- 
siasm. Probably  this  arose  from  the  fact  that  William 
Leggett  was  opposed  to  a  separate  organization  of  the 
Equal  Rights  Democracy.  The  leaders  could  not  go 


1835.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  35 

forward  in  that  direction,  without  encountering  difficulty, 
neither  could  they  go  back  to  the  monopoly  ranks  and  be 
received  into  full  communion,  without  abandoning  the 
principle  for  which  they  had  declared ;  and  to  dissolve 
their  party  would  expose  each  one  singly  to  the  persecu- 
tion of  Tammany,  and  none  of  them  wished  the  fate  of 
Leggett.  Every  way,  their  political  prospects  were 
gloomy,  and  every  consideration  in  their  minds  produced 
deeper  perplexity.  The  impress  of  anxiety  was  on  the 
taces  of  most  of  the  delegates ;  but  at  length,  as  is  usually 
fhe  case  with  politicians  in  difficult  dilemmas,  the  portion 
for  a  separate  organization  and  the  portion  against  it, 
came  to  a  compromise. 

Compromise  !  Beautiful  and  inspiring  spirit  of  Amer- 
ican politicians,  thou  art  the  great  safety-valve  of  poli- 
tics. Compromise  !  Proteus  of  old  was  an  unchanging 
Pyramid  of  Egypt,  compared  to  such  a  many-colored 
rainbow  as  thou  art.  Compromise !  Our  politicians  not 
only  worship  thee  as  a  goddess,  but  they  make  thee  an 
altar  upon  which  they  sacrifice  principle. 

The  compromise  agreed  upon  in  the  present  case,  was 
simply  a  contingency,  That  if  the  General  Committees 
to  be  elected  in  December,  should  be  composed  of  a  major- 
ity of  monopoly  democrats,  the  anti-monopolists  then 
would  form  a  separate  organization. 

There  were  but  two  persons  in  this  convention  avow- 
edly in  favor  of  separate  organization.  Some  of  the 
members  had  too  much  of  the  policy  and  tact  which  dis- 
tinguishes the  expediency  school  of  politicians,  to  immo- 
late self  so  far  as  to  cut  themselves  off  from  the  majority 
portion  of  the  Republican  party,  and  thereby  doom  them- 
selves to  the  hopeless  prospects  of  a  minority.  They 
would  prefer  being  the  conductors  of  the  stray  sheep  back 
to  the  fold,  and  thus  show  to  the  majority  their  own  ex- 
traordinary value  as  able  and  influential  shepherds. 
Others  honestly  believed  that  it  was  the  best  course  to 
struggle  within  the  Republican  party  for  the  democratic 
principle,  rather  than  out  of  it. 


36  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

The  election  for  the  General  Committees  to  Tammany 
Hall  and  for  all  the  wards,  took  place  in  December,  and 
presented  majorities  in  each  decidedly  opposed  to  the 
anti-monopoly  movement,  and  such  strong  majorities  as 
indicated  a  determination  to  crush  the  "  agrarian  spirit " 
entirely.  On  the  occurrence  of  this  result,  what  did  the 
compromisers  do  ?  Somewhat,  perhaps,  like  the  termi- 
nation of  an  old  tragedy,  "  exeunt  omnes  in  great  dejec- 
tion." The  rank  and  file  of  the  Equal  Rights  democracy 
was  left  to  its  own  course,  and  it  soon  took  its  march 
onward.  A  meeting  was  held  on  the  1 1th  of  January, 
1836,  at  the  Military  and  Civic  Hotel,  where,  among 
other  proceedings,  it  was  emphatically  Resolved,  "  That 
it  has  become  the  duty  of  the  Democratic  party  opposed 
to  Monopolies,  to  organize  themselves,  the  better  to  dis- 
seminate and  maintain  their  principles."  Whereupon, 
Job  Haskell  was  chosen  President,  Moses  Jaques  Treas- 
urer, and  Wm.  F.  Piatt,  Secretary,  until  a  plan  of  organi- 
zation should  be  adopted. 

On  the  20th  of  January,  a  general  meeting  was  held 
at  the  same  place,  when  resolutions  of  independence  of 
the  Tammany  organization  were  submitted,  declaring, 
"  That  we  no  longer  recognize  Tammany  hall  as  a  temple 
of  true  democracy ;  nor  the  Tammany  Society  as  a  dem- 
ocratic body  ; — that  the  said  society  exercises  a  political 
as  well  as  a  proprietary  control,  so  that  only  such  candi- 
dates, such  politics,  and  such  usages  as  the  sachems  ap- 
prove can  be  permitted  there.  That  we  renounce  all 
connection  with  the  General  or  other  Committees  which 
may  assemble  there,  and  that  henceforth  we  will  not  be 
the  dupes  of  usages  over  which  the  people  have  no  real 
control,  but  which  interfere  with  the  full  exercise  of  the 
elective  franchise,  and  defraud  the  citizen,  in  the  selec- 
tion of  candidates,  of  an  essential  portion  of  his  constitu- 
tional rights." 

The  whole  subject  of  separation  was  argued  with  great 
vehemency,  for  and  against :  J.  W.  Vethake,  Rodney  S. 
Church,  Alexander  Ming,  Jr.,  against,  and  John  Com- 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  37 

merford,  Wm.  F.  Piatt,  F.  Byrdsall  and  others  for  it. 
The  discussion  lasted  until  midnight,  and  notwithstanding 
motion  after  motion  to  postpone,  and  evade  a  decision,  it 
was  reached  at  last,  and  the  resolutions  were  carried. 
Had  Barnabas  Bates  been  present,  he  might  have  pre- 
vented such  a  decision  by  some  more  proper  and  advisa- 
ble course.  But  from  the  time  of  the  contingency  com- 
promise, he  abandoned  the  Equal  Rights  meetings  there- 
after. His  absence  was  very  properly  felt,  for  no  man 
labored  more  in  the  anti-monopoly  movement  than  he  did. 
He  was  not  only  Treasurer,  but  often  did  he  preside  at 
conventional  meetings,  the  most  able  and  proper  chair- 
man, during  the  summer  and  fall  of  1835.  He  was  a 
pioneer  in  reform,  for  he  assisted  to  build  up  the  Working- 
man's  party  of  1828.  Doubtless  he  had  proper  reasons 
for  his  course  now,  as  it  is  fair  to  believe  that  he  is  a  man 
who  always  acts  from  a  delicate,  as  well  as  profound 
sense  of  propriety. 

A  resolution  was  also  passed  calling  on  the  wards  to 
elect  delegates  to  a  County  Convention,  to  draft  a  plan 
of  organization. 

On  the  9th  of  February,  1836,  the  County  Convention 
of  delegates  met  at  the  Eighth  Ward  House,  in  Spring  st. 
The  following  is  a  list  of  the  delegates : 

Second  Ward.  James  Fiora,  Wm.  A.  Watson,  Wm. 
Hewit,  Richard  Weir,  Dexter  Roberts- 

Third  Ward.  John  Windt,  Sam^i  S.  Parker,  John  A. 
Riell,  John  Watkins,  Marinus  jr-  Vandyke. 

Fourth  Ward.  D.  C.  Pe«lZ>  Joseph  Rose,  Jr.,  Wm.  H. 
Hughes,  Richard  Fren^>  Walter  Coppinger. 

Seventh  Ward.  Thomas  W.  Rennie,  Daniel  Gorham, 
Philo  Scofield,  Enzur  Hall,  George  H.  Purser. 

Eighth  V®rd.  Moses  Jaques,  F.  Byrdsall,  Francis 
Murphy,  ^m-  L.  Boyee,  Ephraim  Furniss. 

Te^th  Ward.  Alexander  Ming,  Jr.,  Levi  D.  Slamm, 
Ja/nes  A.  Pyne,  Warden  Hayward,  Amos  Waring. 

Eleventh  Ward.  Job  Haskell,  Peter  Rose,  Elijah  Smack, 
Charles  E.  Newman,  Wilson  Hawkins. 
4 


38  HISTORY  OF  THE  [I836o 

Thirteenth  Ward.  Wm.  Boggs,  John  Woods,  John 
W.  Brown,  John  Commerford,  Oramel  Bingharn. 

Fourteenth  Ward.  Wm.  F.  Piatt,  Samuel  J.Pooley, 
John  Rusk,  Daniel  Reeder,  Alfred  C.  Price. 

The  reader  will  perceive  in  the  foregoing  list  of  dele- 
gates, but  few  of  the  prominent  names  conspicuous  in  the 
original  anti-monopoly  movement.  Only  Alex'r.  Ming, 
Jr.,  Job  Haskell,  John  Windt,  and  John  Commerford. 
The  places  of  the  seceders  were  ably  occupied  by  M. 
Jaques,  Stephen  Hasbrouck,  Alex'r.  F.  Vache,  A.  D. 
Wilson  and  others. 

The  Convention  appointed  a  special  committee  to 
draft  a  plan  of  organization,  and  at  the  second  meeting 
of  the  Convention  the  committee  reported  one,  which  was 
adopted.  The  following  are  its  principal  features : — 

It  provided  for  general  County  meetings  on  the  first 
Monday  in  each  month,  and  for  Ward  meetings  in  each 
month. 

Jt  provided  for  the  election  of  County  officers,  Treasurer, 
Recording  Secretary,  and  Finance  Committee,  on  the 
first  Monday  in  June  and  December  of  each  year. 

It  provided  for  the  nomination  of  candidates  for  the 
suffrage  of  the  people,  viz  : 

ARTICLE    VI. 
MODE  Ot  NOMINATING  CANDIDATES. 

In  the  selection  of  candidai«,  that  are  to  be  voted  for  by  a  general 
ticket  throughout  the  County,  eau.  Ward  may  nominate  one  person 
for  each  office  to  be  filled,  which  noujnatjons  shall,  within  two  days 
thereafter,  be  handed  to  the  Recording  fc>~>retary  of  tne  County,  who 
shall  arrange  them  in  order  under  each  ofht^  without  repeating  the 
name"  of  the  persons  who  may  have  had  a  nott*,ation  from  several 
Wards  for  the  same  office ;  which  list  of  nominates  snall  be  pub- 
lished with  a  proper  explanatory  heading,  at  least  th^e  times  prior 
to  the  meeting  for  balloting,  in  such  papers  as  the  mating  may 
direct. 

The  Secretary  shall  also  have  prepared  for  the  use  of  the  members 
a  sufficiency  of  printed  lists  of  the  persons  nominated,  from  whit\> 
the  members  shall,  by  ballot,  select  their  candidates.  If  a  ballot 
contain  more  names  than  necessary  for  the  office  or  offices  voted  for, 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  39 

such  ballet  shall  not  be  counted.    A  majority  of  votes  shall  duly 
nominate  candidates  to  be  supported. 

It  provided,  that  any  person  might  become  a  member 
of  the  party,  by  signing  the  Declaration  of  Principles, 
but  that  no  person  should  have  the  right  to  vote  unless 
he  have  signed  the  Declaration  at  a  Ward  or  County 
meeting. 

It  provided  the  following  rule  as  to  candidates : 

ARTICLE   VIII. 

RIGHT  OF  INSTRUCTION. 

Every  candidate  when  notified  of  his  nomination  shall  be  required 
to  sign  the  Declaration  of  Principles,  and  such  written  pledge  as  the 
meeting  may  frame,  enumerating  particular  measures  he  is  to  advo- 
cate or  oppose. 

The  following  is  the 

DECLARATION  OF  PRINCIPLES. 

WE,  whose  names  are  hereunto  affixed,  do  associate  ourselves,  and 
unite,  for  the  purpose  of  effecting  Constitutional  Reform  in  legisla- 
tion, and  to  bring  into  practice  the  principles  on  which  the  govern- 
ments of  these  United  States  were  originally  founded.  We  utterly 
disclaim  any  intention  or  design  of  instituting  any  new  party,  but 
declare  ourselves  the  orignal  Democratic  party,  our  whole  object 
being  political  reformation  by  reviving  the  landmarks  and  principles 
of  Democracy.  We  therefore  hold  with  the  revered  Jefferson,  that, 

1st.  "  The  true  foundation  of  Republican  Government  is  the  equal 
rights  of  every  citizen,  in  his  person  and  property,  and  in  their  man- 
agement." 

2d.  "  The  rightful  power  of  all  legislation  is  to  declare  and  enforce 
only  our  natural  rights  and  duties,  and  to  take  none  of  them  from  us. 
No  man  has  a  natural  right  to  commit  aggression  on  the  equal  rights 
of  another ;  and  this  is  ALL  from  which  the  law  ought  to  restrain  him. 
Every  man  is  under  the  natural  duty  of  contributing  to  the  necessities 
of  society ;  and  this  is  all  the  law  should  enforce  on  him.  When  the 
laws  have  declared  and  enforced  all  this,  they  have  fulfilled  their 
functions." 

3d.  "  The  idea  is  quite  unfounded  that  on  entering  into  society,  we 
give  up  any  natural  right." 

4th.  Unqualified  and  uncompromising  hostility  to  bank  notes  and 
paper  money  as  a  circulating  medium,  because  gold  and  silver  is  the 
only  safe  and  constitutional  currency. 

5th.  Hostility  to  any  and  all  monopolies  by  legislation,  because 
they  are  a  violation  of  the  equal  rights  of  The  People. 


40  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

6th.  Hostility  to  the  dangerous  and  unconstitutional  creation  of 
vested  rights  by  legislation,  because  they  are  a  usurpation  of  the 
people's  sovereign  rights.  And  we  hold  that  all  laws  or  acts  of  in- 
corporation passed  by  one  Legislature  can  be  rightfully  altered  or 
repealed  by  their  successors. 

The  Convention  passed  the  following  Preamble  and 
Resolutions : 

WHEREAS — When,  on  the  ever  memorable  4th  of  July,  1776,  the 
thirteen  Colonies  of  North  America  renounced  all  political  connec- 
tion or  subjection  to  the  government  of  Great  Britain,  they  founded 
their  Declaration  of  Independence  on  the  natural,  equal,  inalienable 
rights  of  man.  And  when  subsequently,  it  became  necessary  to  form 
Constitutions  and  governments  for  themselves,  the  democratic  princi- 
ple of  the  paramount  sovereignty  of  the  people,  was  constantly  and 
emphatically  set  forth :  hence,  it  was  only  as  a  matter  of  conveni- 
ence, that  the  plan  of  legislating  by  representatives  was  adopted ; 
but  the  worst  prerogative  of  despotism,  that  of  vesting  privileges  and 
divesting  of  rights,  never  could  have  been  delegated  to  any  govern- 
ment in  the  Union.  Ours  are  governments  of  derived  and  specified 
powers,  and  not  of  original  or  independent  authority  ;  and,  like  the 
leaves  of  the  forest,  they  are  only  of  annual  duration.  Had  the  fram- 
ers  of  our  Constitutions  considered  it  right  in  itself,  consistent  with 
the  just  rights  of  the  people,  or  with  our  political  system,  for  legisla- 
tors to  enact  laws  specifying  any  number  of  years,  or  a  perpetuity  of 
existence,  would  they  have  established  annual  elections  and  annual 
governments  ?  If  a  legislature  can  enact  any  law  to  continue  in 
force  for  as  long  a  term  of  years  as  it  chooses  to  designate,  it  can  also 
as  reasonably  hold  office  and  exercise  power  so  long  as  it  can  pledge 
the  public  faith  to  its  acts,  and  bind  future  generations. 

It  is  well  argued  and  demonstrated  by  Thomas  Jefferson,  that  every 
generation  of  mankind  has  the  sovereign  right  of  changing  the  gov- 
ernment and  constructing  a  new  Constitution.  He  averaged  a  gene- 
ration at  twenty  years.  Can  a  legislature,  therefore,  make  laws 
more  sacred  than  the  Constitution,  more  binding  on  the  people  ?  Is 
the  servant  greater  than  his  master  ?  Is  the  legislature  greater  than 
the  people,  the  paramount  sovereign  ?  Is  a  charter  more  irrevoca- 
ble than  the  Constitution  ?  And,  in  short,  can  they  alter,  repeal,  or 
remake  the  one,  and  dare  they  not  interfere  with  or  repeal  the  other  ? 
If  so,  then  is  the  paramount  sovereignty  in  chartered  companies,  and 
not  in  the  hands  of  the  people. 

Resolved — As  the  deliberate  belief  and  solemn  sentiment  of  this  Con- 
vention, That  it  is  usurpation  of  the  worst  and  most  dangerous  charac- 
ter, for  any  legislature  in  the  Union  to  grant  charters  of  privileges 
or  immunities,  for  any  specified  term  of  years,  because  legislatures 
cannot  rightfully  grant  that  to  others  which  they  never  possessed 
themselves,  and  because  they  have  no  prospective  authority  as  to  fu- 
turity. They  have  no  power,  ability,  competency,  or  means  to  add  to 
or  increase  the  rights  of  the  great  mass  of  the  people,  and  therefore 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  41 

no  authority  to  take  from,  limit,  or  diminish  those  rights.  They  have 
no  right  to  tie  up  the  hands  of  their  successors  on  any  subject  of  legis- 
lation that  concerns  or  affects  the  community.  The  natural,  the 
equal,  inalienable,  civil  and  social  rights  of  the  people,  are  always 
invaded  where  privileges  are  granted  to  individuals  or  companies.  In 
fact,  the  people  are  not  sovereign,  nor  freedom  does  not  truly  exist, 
when  governments  assume  such  prerogatives  and  exercise  such  injus- 
tice and  despotism ;  our  annual  elections  are  an  absurdity,  the  prohi- 
bition of  privileged  orders  in  the  Constitution  is  a  mere  sounding 
brass  and  tinkling  cymbal,  so  long  as  our  legislative  halls  are  charter 
manufactories. 

Resolved,  That  our  principles  and  measures  are  strictly  democratic, 
in  accordance  with  the  theory  of  our  government  and  the  happiness 
of  our  country.  We  require  nothing  exclusive  for  ourselves,  no  ad- 
vantage but  what  we  are  desirous  should  be  extended  to  each  and 
every  citizen  of  this  republic.  We  "  ask  nothing  but  what  is  mani- 
festly right,  nor  will  we  submit  tamely  to  those  abuses  of  legislation 
which  are  clearly  wrong."  We  ask,  "  that  the  blessings  of  govern- 
ment, like  the  dews  of  Heaven,  should  descend  equally  on  the  high 
and  the  low,  the  rich  and  the  poor." 

We  ask  the  repeal  of  all  unequal,  unjust,  unconstitutional  laws, 
granting  powers  or  privileges  to  portions  of  the  community,  to  the  di- 
vesting of  the  rights  and  manifest  injury  of  the  majority. 

We  ask  that  the  state  legislatures  will  confine  themselves  to  their 
proper  sphere  of  action,  as  respects  the  currency,  and  that  they  will 
cease  to  usurp  from  the  general  government  a  power  granted  by  the 
Constitution.  We  demand  that  the  state  governments  will  no  longer 
authorize  the  issuing  of  bills  of  credit,  commonly  called  bank  notes, 
in  open  violation  of  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States. 

We  ask  that  our  legislators  will  legislate  for  the  whole  people  and 
not  for  favored  portions  of  our  fellow-citizens,  thereby  creating  dis- 
tinct aristocratic  little  communities  within  the  great  community.  It 
is  by  such  partial  and  unjust  legislation  that  the  productive  classes  of 
society  are  compelled  by  necessity,  to  form  unions  for  mutual  preser- 
vation, and  because  they  are  not  equally  protected  and  respected  as 
the  other  classes  of  mankind. 

We  ask  to  be  reinstated  in  our  equal  and  constitutional  rights  ac- 
cording to  the  fundamental  truths  in  the  Declaration  of  Independence, 
and  as  sanctioned  by  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States,  because  it 
is  "  self-evident  that  all  men  are  created  equal;  that  they  are  endowed 
by  their  creator  with  certain  inalienable  rights ;  that  among  these  are 
1  ife,  liberty  aud  the  pursuit  of  happiness ;  and  that  to  secure  those 
rights,  governments  are  instituted  among  men." 

In  short,  we  ask  nothing  but  what  is  consistent  with  .Christian  De- 
mocracy ;  for,  in  the  declaration  that  "  God  is  no  respecter  of  persons, 
all  are  equal  in  his  sight,"  we  behold  the  universal  equality  of  man  : — 
In  the  denunciation  of,  "  Woe  unto  you  ye  lawyers,  for  ye  bind 
heavy  burthens  and  grievous  to  be  borne  upon  men's  shoulders,"  we 
see  the  strongest  form  of  command  against  unequal  laws,  or  mo- 
nopolies : — In  the  precept  of  "  Do  unto  others  as  ye  would  that  they 
3* 


42  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

should  do  unto  you,"  is  the  divine  doctrine  of  Equal  Justice ; — and  in 
the  injunction  of  "  Be  ye  perfect,  even  as  your  father  in  heaven  is 
perfect,"  we  behold  the  great  law  of  progress. 

The  convention  at  the  close  of  its  second  meeting,  ad- 
ourned  sine  die.  The  plan  of  organization  was  submit- 
ted to  the  Senate  county  meeting,  February  23d,  and 
adopted.  Its  adoption  caused  further  defections,  but  the 
men  who  adopted  it  made  no  calculations  of  self,-  of 
expediency  or  compromise.  They  had  taken  principle 
only  in  view,  and  they  had  made  up  their  minds  to  go 
onward  towards  the  mark  of  their  high  calling,  let 
others  do  as  they  might.  The  spirit  of  progress  was  in 
them,  or  that  Christian  light  which  inspires  bright  hopes 
in  the  future  for  humanity,  a  new  earth,  as  well  as  a  new 
heaven. 

The  Declaration  of  principles  was  drawn  up  by  Moses 
Jaques,  the  President  of  the  Convention,  who  is  now  in- 
troduced to  the  reader  as  the  man  venerated  by  the  little 
band  of  Equal  Rights  Democrats — as  something  more  than 
their  leader,  their  patriarch.  Mild,  yet  immovably  fixed 
in  his  views  and  principles,  whatever  were  his  convic- 
tions, they  were  the  workings  of  his  own  mind  and  rather 
incitements  from  within,  than  excitements  from  without : 
consequently,  such  a  man  wrould  be  more  of  a  thinker  and 
a  reasoner,  than  an  impassioned  speaker ;  yet  he  always 
spoke  lucidly  and  with  effect.  His  age,  his  qualifications, 
and  his  connection  with  the  Revolution  of  1776  combined 
to  make  him  the  man  to  lead  a  body  of  democrats  wrho 
thought  and  reasoned,  and  who  had  love  of  principle  and 
of  country  at  heart.  His  father  had  been  a  colonel  com- 
mandant of  the  New  Jersey  line  during  the  revolutionary 
war,  and  such  was  the  confidence  reposed  in  the  thought- 
fulness  and  firmness  of  the  son,  a  lad  not  ten  years  old, 
that  he  was  mounted  on  horseback  and  employed  to  carry 
despatches  to  General  George  Washington.  The  boy 
did  his  errands  faithfully  and  well,  and  since  then,  the 
whole  life  of  the  man  morally  and  politically  has  been 
worthy  of  the  patriot  boy  of  the  Revolution,  Such  is 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  43 

Moses  Jaques — the  patriarchal  leader  of  the  Loco-Focos, 
for  they  never  had  in  fact  any  other  visible  leader  among 
them. 


CHAPTER   III. 

Election  of  Officers — Remarks  on  New  Organization — Sketch  of  the 
Old  Military  and  Civil  Hotel — Preparations  for  Charter  Election — 
Nomination  of  William  Leggett  for  the  Mayoralty — His  answer  to 
Committee — Alexander  Ming,  jun.  nominated — He  accepts — Ex- 
tracts from  his  letter — The  Democrat — Ward  Nominations  for  the 
Common  Council — Extracts  from  M.  Jaques'  Address — Reflec- 
tions— New  paper,  «  the  Union" — Sketch  of  its  Editor,  John  Com- 
merford — Republican  Nominating  Committee  of  1835 — Resolutions 
— Remarks. 


Principles,  Measures  and  Men. 

BROWNSON. 

AT  the  first  regular  general  meeting  of  the  Equal 
Rights  Democracy  under  the  plan  of  organization,  the 
election  of  officers  took  place.  Moses  Jaques  was  elect- 
ed Treasurer,  and  was  successively  re-elected,  until  he 
left  the  city  in  1837.  F.  Byrdsall  was  elected  Recording 
Secretary,  which  office  he  also  held  until  the  fifth  of  June 
1837,  when  he  declined  being  a  candidate. 

By  the  election  of  these  two  officers,  and  a  Committee 
of  Finance,  the  new  constitution  of  organization  was  put 
into  operation,  to  the  exclusion  of  those  political  mono- 
polies, General  committees,  Ward  committees,  or  Nomi- 
nating committees,  by  which  the  sovereignty  of  the  people 
is  annually  abstracted.  Candidates  were  hereafter  to  be 
selected  by  the  popular  and  truly  democratic  mode  of  the 
direct  vote  by  ballot  of  the  majority.  The  right  of  suffrage 
consists  of  two  parts,  first,  the  right  of  selecting  the  candi- 
date— an  exercise  of  the  right  of  conscience  politically  ; 
a»?d  second,  the  right  of  voting  at  the  polls — an  exrecise  of 
the  right  of  speech  ;  neither  of  which  a  citizen  can  right- 
fully alienate  to  another.  Besides,  as  was  justly  remark- 


44  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

ed  in  the  Report  of  the  Committee  that  drafted  the  plan 
of  organization,  "  The  '  usage  *  of  nominating  com- 
mittees furnishes  this  strong  argument  against  popular 
suffrage,  that  the  people  are  not  competent,  or  have  not 
judgment  enough,  or  they  cannot  conveniently  select  their 
own  candidates,  and  must  therefore  elect  a  small  number 
of  supposed  wise  and  judicious  men  to  make  selections 
for  them." 

Henceforth  every  Loco-Foco  found  himself  on  the  broad 
platform  of  Equality  of  Position,  as  well  as  of  rights, 
there  being  no  preferred  men  to  vamp  up  matters  by  au- 
thority, and  thus  'sink  the  individual  citizen  in  his  own 
eyes,  by  imparting  the  character  of  irregularity  to  any  of 
his  political  movements.  This  elevated  him  to  his  right- 
ful position,  so  that  independence  of  mind  and  freedom  of 
debate  followed  as  natural  consequences.  Hence,  there 
was  no  such  thing  as  attempting  to  put  a  man  down  at  a 
Loco-Foco  meeting,  for  each  auditor  felt  that  the  rights  of 
the  speaker  and  his  own  rights,  as  well  as  political  posi- 
tion, were  the  same,  and  exactly  equal ;  and  as  each 
man  saw  and  knew  that  his  rights  were  regarded  as  sa- 
cred, that  he  would  be  listened  to  by  all,  he  had  strong 
inducements  to  think  before  he  spoke.  In  short,  Loco 
Foco  meetings  were  the  best  of  political  schools,  and  the 
old  Military  and  Civic  Hotel  was  the  arena  of  more  dis- 
cussion on  "  principles,  measures  and  men,"  than  the  head 
quarters  of  either  the  Whigs  or  Monopoly  Republicans. 
But  it  is  but  due  to  those  whose  history  this  book  pro- 
fesses to  be,  that  the  old  head  quarters  of  the  Equal 
Rights  Democracy  should  be  described. 

The  Military  and  Civic  Hotel,  formerly  located  on  the 
S.  W.  corner  of  Bowery  and  Broome  street,  was  a  frame 
building  of  the  olden  time,  not  quite  two  stories  high, 
and  it  appeared  to  have  a  friendly  leaning  towards  the 
adjoining  house,  probably  of  a  long  standing.  Before 
entering  the  door,  it  was  necessary  to  descend  two  or 
three  steps  below  the  pavement  of  the  street,  to  bring 
you  on  a  level  with  the  threshold.  When  you  entered 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  45 

the  door,  you  would  see  that  the  Hotel  was  one  of  the 
most  unostentatious  of  hotels  in  the  world,  for  there  was 
not  the  least  appearance  of  aristocracy  in  the  equipments 
of  the  bar,  the  unassuming  landlord,  or  the  guests  to 
whom  his  services  were  devoted.  Passing  round  the  bar, 
you  would  find  yourself  at  the  foot  of  humble  looking 
stairs,  lighted  of  evenings  by  a  very  humble-looking  dark 
japanned  lamp.  If  you  wished  to  raise  yourself  to  the 
level  of  the  street,  you  had  to  ascend  the  stairs,  or  retrace 
your  steps  and  leave  the  Military  and  Civic  Hotel.  But 
if  you  were  desirous  of  seeing  the  temple  of  Loco-Focoism, 
and  would  go  up  the  stairs,  you  would  by  ascending  some 
six  or  eight  steps,  find  yourself  at  the  door  of  the  sacred 
room.  On  crossing  its  threshold,  you  would  find  your- 
self under  a  low  ceiling,  and  surrounded  by  walls  of  a 
smoky  antique  appearance.  Two  or  four  candles  were 
wont  to  be  stuck  up  round  the  room  in  tins  attached  to 
the  walls,  and,  in  the  early  days  of  the  Loco  Foco  party, 
two  candles  graced  the  table  until  they  were  superceded 
by  an  embrowned  lamp  suspended  from  the  ceiling,  which 
sent  up  its  column  of  rich  smoke,  as  if  to  indicate  the  as- 
piring fortunes  of  the  Loco  Focos.  There  was  a  platform 
large  enough  for  a  small  table  and  three  or  four  chairs  to 
stand  on,  and  this  humble  enthronement  for  officers  of 
meetings,  was  the  only  aristocratic  or  monarchic  furnish- 
ment  of  the  sanctorum.  Yet  it  was  here  that  pure  democ- 
racy was  preached  ;  and  it  was  here  that  enthusiasm  was 
enkindled  for  the  glorious  principle  of  equality  of  rights  ; 
and  often  have  the  old  window  sashes,  in  the  time-seasoned, 
shrunken  casements,  rattled  front  and  rear  in  unison  with 
the  heart-felt  applauses  given  in  the  great  cause  of  hu- 
man rights.  The  Founder  of  Christianity  was  born  in  a 
manger ;  and  it  is  perfectly  in  character  that  the  principles 
of  Christian  democracy  should  be  proclaimed  in  such  hum- 
ble places  as  the  Military  and  Civic  Hotel. 

The  manger  is  no  longer  in  Bethlehem,  nor  is  there  a 
vestige  of  it  to  be  seen.  The  Military  and  Civic  Hotel  is 
no  longer  on  the  south-west  corner  of  Bowery  and  Broome 


46  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

streets,  for  a  large  brick  building  stands  in  its  place  in 
lofty  altitude.  But  the  principles  taught  by  Him  who 
associated  with  publicans  and  sinners,  and  which  were 
advocated  by  the  Loco  Focos,  are  the  same,  and  they  are 
eternal. 

At  the  general  meeting  on  the  7th  of  March,  it  was 
unanimously  resolved  to  nominate,  at  as  early  a  day  as 
practicable,  candidates  for  ward  officers,  and  also  a  can- 
didate for  the  mayoralty,  to  be  supported  at  the  ensuing 
election.  William  Leggett  was  subsequently  nominated, 
and  the  report  is  subjoined  of  the  Committee  appointed 
to  wait  on  him  to  tender  him  the  nomination. 

"Your  Committee,  appointed  by  the  General  Meeting  of  the 
Democratic  electors  of  this  city,  held  at  this  place  on  the  21st  instant, 
to  wait  on  Mr.  Leggett,  and  inform  him  of  the  unanimous  wish  of 
his  fellow-citizens,  composing  the  anti-monopoly  democracy,  that  he 
would  consent  to  be  their  candidate  for  the  mayoralty,  at  the  ap- 
proaching election,  have  performed  that  duty  and  now  report : 

"  That  they  waited  on  Mr.  Leggett,  and  stated  to  him  the  desire  of 
his  fellow-citizens,  and  urged  upon  him,  in  the  best  manner  they  could, 
the  importance,  and  even  necessity,  of  accepting  the  proposed  nomi- 
nation. 

"  Mr.  Leggett  heard  with  great  attention  your  Committee,  and  ac- 
knowledged himself  under  much  obligation  for  the  favorable  opinion 
of  his  fellow-citizens,  and  the  nattering  manner  in  which  the  nomina- 
tion had  been  tendered.  He  professed  himself  to  be  fully  with  us  in 
principle,  and  would  do  all  in  his  power,  as  editor  of  a  paper,  to  sus- 
tain our  cause.  But  that,  owing  to  ill  health,  the  peculiar  state  of 
his  family,  his  pecuniary  affairs,  and  his  engagements  to  his  partner 
before  he  left  for  Europe,  he  could  not  accept  the  honor  so  kindly 
offered  to  him.  The  foregoing,  and  other  reasons,  fully  satisfied  your 
Committee  that  his  declining  the  nomination  was  fully  justifiable  and 
proper." 

M.  JAQUES,  Ch'n  Committee. 

On  the  announcement  of  Mr.  Leggett's  refusal,  the 
meeting  proceeded  at  once  to  nominate  a  candidate. 
Several  persons  were  put  in  nomination,  but  Alexander 
Ming  had  a  majority  of  the  ballots  in  his  favor,  and  was 
duly  nominated. 

When  the  vote  in  his  favor  was  declared  to  the  meet- 
ing, he  vacated  the  chair,  (for  he  was  chairman  of  the 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  47 

meeting,)  and  eloquently  addressed  his  fellow  citizens* 
He  avowed  his  willingness  to  act  for  and  with  the  people 
in  any  and  every  democratic  movement.  He  accepted  the 
nomination,  because  it  was  given  by  a  large  majority. 

A  committee  of  sixteen  was  chosen  to  address  him  in 
order  to  obtain  his  views  of  reform.  This  committee 
reported  to  a  subsequent  meeting  his  letter,  from  which 
we  extract  the  following  : 

"  NEW  YORK,  April  4,  1836, 

"Gentlemen — I  have  received  and  perused  with  attention  the  com- 
munication addressed  to  me,  by  a  Committee  appointed  by  a  meeting 
of  the  Democracy,  at  which  I  had  the  honor  to  receive  the  nomina- 
tion as  the  candidate  of  the  Democratic  party,  for  the  office  of  Mayor. 
Your  letter,  also,  particularly  requests  my  written  reply;  and  I  make 
no  hesitation  in  cheerfully  acceding  to  your  wishes. 

"  The  affirmations  and  interrogatories  which  are  contained  in  your 
communication  cannot  but  meet  with  the  concurrence  of  every  friend 
of  our  country,  and  every  advocate  of  the  freedom  and  purity  of 
elections.  It  therefore  affords  me  great  pleasure  to  state,  how  cheer- 
fully my  heart  responds  to  sentiments  and  principles  so  emphatically 
democratic. 

"  That  no  candidate  should  be  held  up  for  popular  favor,  unless  he 
express  himself  fully  and  freely  on  the  general  and  local  topics  which 
may  agitate  the  times,  and  that  he  be  pledged  to  sustain  democratic 
principles,  and  advocate  the  interests  and  will  of  his  constituents,  is  a 
doctrine  so  orthodox,  so  consonant  with  the  principles  and  advice  of 
the  immortal  Jefferson,  so  favorable  to  a  proper  appreciation  and 
necessary  canvassing  of  the  merits  of  the  people's  candidates,  that  I 
cannot  but  hail  your  determination  to  resort  to  and  practice  it,  as  the 
harbinger  of  the  ultimate  triumph  of  the  political,  civil,  and  natural 
rights  of  man. 

"  In  answer  to  your  first  interrogatory,  I  declare  myself  satisfied 
and  confirmed  in  the  opinion,  that  in  the  democratic  republic  equal 
rights  should  be  secured  to  every  citizen,  in  his  person  and  in  his 
property,  and  that  he  should  be  left  perfectly  untrammelled  in  the  free 
exercise  and  enjoyment  of  them. 

"  No  laws  should  be  enacted  in  a  free  government,  to  give  to  one 
citizen  rights  and  privileges  from  which  others  are  restricted ;  nor 
confer  benefits  on  any  in  which  all  may  not  participate.  Laws  there- 
fore, made  for  the  protection  and  interest  of  one  party,  and  not  for  all 
parties,  are  aggressions  on  our  equal  rights,  violations  of  our  consti- 
tutional charter,  and  acts  of  monopoly  to  which  I  am  strenuously 
opposed,  and  which  ought  not  in  my  opinion  to  be  allowed  to  exist  in 
a  land  of  equal  liberty  and  equal  laws. 

"  Any  acts  or  ordinances,  therefore,  which  tend  to  subvert  ths  fun- 
damental principles  of  equality  on  which  this  government  is  founded, 


48  HISTORY    OF   THE  [1836. 

or  to  endanger  the  rights,  property  or  persons  of  our  citizens,  to  re- 
strict the  freedom  of  the  press,  the  freedom  of  religious,  civil,  or 
political  opinion,  I  pledge  myself  to  you,  should  readily  receive  my 
utmost  hostility,  and  were  I  possessed  of  the  power,  my  unalterable 
and  determined  veto." 

The  remainder  of  Colonel  Ming's  reply,  was  in  rela- 
tion to  markets  and  ferries  and  the  freedom  of  trade  from 
license  and  inspection  Laws;  and  his  answers  were  in 
perfect  consistency  with  the  principles  of  free  trade,  and 
the  political  doctrines  of  that  portion  of  the  Democratic 
family  to  which  he  belonged. 

It  is  proper  to  mention  in  this  place,  that  the  Democracy 
above  mentioned  had  concluded  to  have  an  organ  as  well 
as  an  organization,  and  for  this  purpose  the  "  Democrat" 
made  its  appearance  on  the  9th  of  March.  It  was  pub- 
lished by  John  Windt  and  his  partner,  composing  the  firm 
of  Windt  &  Conrad,  and  issued  as  a  penny  paper  under 
the  editorial  charge  of  Clinton  Roosevelt. 

The  campaign  of  the  Charter  Election  in  the  city  of 
New  York  1836,  presented  the  tickets  of  three  distinct 
political  parties  for  the  Common  Council,  and  the  tickets 
of  four  parties  for  the  Mayoralty.  The  candidates  for 
the  latter  were : 

1st.  Monopoly  or  Tammany  candidate,  C.W.  LAWRENCE, 
2nd.  Whig  or  Federalist  do  SETH  GEER, 

3rd.  Anti-monopoly  or  Loco-Foco   "    A.  MING,  jr. 
4th.  Native  American,  F.  B.  MORSE. 

The  Loco-Focos  supported  the  following  candidates  for 
the  Common  Council. 

Aldermen.  Assistants. 

3rd.  WTard  John  Windt,  John  Watkins, 

4th.      "  John  H.  Lee,  D.  C.  Pentz, 

5th.      "  F.  S.  Cozzens,  Zina  H.  Harris, 

6th.      "  C.  Crolius,  R.  S.  Church, 

7th.      "  E.  G.  Barney,  Aaron  Swartz, 

8th.      "  M.  Jaques,  V.  Sillcocks, 

10th.      "  JobHaskell,  P.  Snedecor, 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  49 

llth.  Ward  B.  F.  Hallock,  J.  L.  Stratton, 

13th.      «  R.  Waterhouse,  *  J.  W.  Brown, 

14th.      "  Danl.  Reeder,  S.  J.  Pooley, 

16th.      «  G.  B.  Thorpe,  Don  A.  Cushman. 

The  running  of  the  above  named  candidates,  had  the  effect 
of  dividing  the  Common  Council  equally  between  the  Tam- 
many and  Whig  parties.  The  board  of  Aldermen  stood 
8  to  8,  and  many  weeks  elapsed  before  a  presiding  officer 
was  chosen.  Yet  we  know  of  no  bad  consequences  re- 
sulting to  the  public  through  this  novel  inter-regnum  of 
city  legislation.  Could  it  not  be  demonstrated  that  it 
would  have  been  well  for  the  people  of  the  United  States, 
had  there  been  a  total  absence  of  legislation  in  the  Gen- 
eral Government  and  all  the  legislatures  of  the  states  and 
cities,  from  1835  to  1843  ? 

The  votes  on  the  candidates  for  the  Mayoralty  were  as 
follows : 

Lawrence,  .         .         .         .         .  16101 

Geer,  5989 

Ming,  2712 

Morse,  1496 

C.  W.  Lawrence,  the  candidate  of  the  monopoly  Demo- 
cracy, was  elected. 

Thus  the  anti-monopoly  revolt  in  the  previous  election 
in  November,  inflicted  a  wound  upon  the  system  of  mo- 
nopoly from  which  it  has  never  recovered.  TheLoco-Fo- 
co  movement  in  the  charter  election  in  April  following, 
inflicted  a  wound  upon  the  official  and  political  organiza- 
tion which  sustained  the  system  in  the  city ;  yet  these 
events  did  not  open  the  eyes  of  the  "  old  fashioned  Dim- 
mycrats"  as  they  called  themselves,  par-excellence.  They 
"  believed  not  in  the  new  fangled  Democracy  of  the 
Evening  Post  and  the  Loco-Focos."  They  had  to  feel  be- 
fore they  would  believe.  No  indeed,  they  stood  by  their 
darling  monopoly  system  to  the  last,  as  long  as  it  stood, 
and  not  until  it  came  falling  downward,  did  they  fall  away 
5 


50  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 


from  it  and  condemn  it.     Such  was  the  dim  sighted  dim- 
ocracy  of  these  "  dimmycrats." 

And  now,  gentle  reader,  you  are  requested  to  contem- 
plate the  glorious  spectacle  of  a  little  band  of  men  contend- 
ing against  two  great  political  parties,  for  the  sake  of  prin- 
ciples only.  There  was  no  prospect  of  success  as  a  par- 
ty, no  chance  of  electing  to  office,  and  yet  this  little  band 
performed  the  arduous  labor,  and  incurred  the  heavy  ex- 
pense, of  two  elections  each  year,  which  required  the  en- 
ergy and  means  of  the  greatest  parties  to  sustain.  But 
this  little  band  felt  and  knew  they  had  a  just  and  right- 
eous cause  in  their  charge,  and  many  of  them  disinteres- 
tedly devoted  their  best  energies,  and  most  of  them  gave 
all  they  could  spare  from  their  scanty  means ;  for  they 
were  animated  by  a  noble  enthusiasm  which  had  its  ori- 
gin from  a  higher  source  than  self-seeking,  office  or  profit. 
The  difficulties  they  had  to  encounter — the  sacrifices  they 
had  to  make,  and  the  slanders  they  had  to  bear  from  every 
point  of  the  political  compass,  inspired  them  to  higher  vir- 
tue and  to  greater  efforts.  M.  Jaques,  in  his  address  to  the 
citizens  of  the  8th  Ward,  when  he  was  run  as  a  candidate 
for  the  Common  Council,  gave  the  most  correct  view  of 
the  motives,  objects  and  position  of  the  party. 

"  In  suffering  myself  at  this  time  to  be  held  up  by  you  as  a  candi- 
date for  office,  I  am  fully  aware  of  the  calumny — the  abuse — the  con- 
tumely I  am  to  receive  from  corrupt  and  unprincipled  party  presses. 
But  gentlemen,  I  have  made  up  my  mind  to  make  the  sacrifice  and 
endure  the  calumny — to  sustain  the  principles  and  measures  which 
we  have  pledged  ourselves  to  carry  out." 

"  The  present  may  truly  be  said  to  be  a  time  which  tries  men's 
principles.  The  sun-shine  patriot  shrinks  from  the  contest,  and  seeks 
refuge  in  compromises,  in  expediency,  in  any  thing,  but  an  honest  and 
independent  support  of  principle." 

"  The  principles  of  Democracy  and  the  principles  of  morality,  are 

one  and  the  same.     That  maxim  which  teaches  us  to  do  as  we  would 

be  done  by,  is  nothing  more  than  the  doctrine  of  reciprocity  of  benefits 

njoined.     That  precept  which  teaches  us  to  return  good  for  evil,  is 

the  peaceful  submission  of  our  wrongs  to  the  laws  of  our  country  and 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  51 

the  force  of  public  opinion  for  redress.  That  precept  which  bids  us 
to  love  our  neighbor  as  ourselves,  is  nothing  more  than  the  doctrine 
of  Equal  Rights  inculcated. 

"Ours  is  the  cause  of  justice,  of  humanity,  and  of  benevolence. 
The  God  of  justice,  of  humanity  and  of  benevolence,  is  on  our  side  ; 
therefore  we  have  nothing  to  fear.  Let  no  man  who  earns  his 
bread  by  the  sweat  of  his  brow  neglect  to  deposite  his  vote  in  support 
of  reform,  and  of  the  natural  equal  rights  of  man." 

Will  it  be  believed  in  future  years,  that  the  man  who 
uttered  the  above  sentiments,  and  his  political  associates 
who  cherished  them,  were  stigmatized  as  the  "  worst  en- 
emies of  the  best  institutions  of  society  ?"  As  the  "  ene- 
mies of  the  laws  of  God  and  man  ?"  "  As  destructive 
Agrarians,  seeking  an  equal  division  of  properly  ?"  As 
"  infidels"  opposed  to  all  religion  and  morality  ?  Yet 
these  and  many  more  calumnies  were  put  in  print,  read, 
believed  and  circulated  until  the  very  term  of  Loco  Foco  in 
politics,  was  one  of  utter  abhorrence.  Much  has  been 
said  of  the  intelligence  of  the  American  people.  If  an 
excessive  gullibility,  which  receives  all  the  falsehoods  of 
party  presses  as  truths,  constitutes  intelligence,  then  are 
we  the  most  intelligent  people  that  ever  existed. 

Soon  after  the  charter  election,  at  a  special  meeting 
on  the  15th  of  April,  it  was  resolved  that  the  anti- 
monopoly  organization  throughout  the  city,  should  be 
maintained  with  increased  vigilance  and  perseverance. 
It  was  also  resolved,  at  this  meeting,  to  call  a  county 
convention  to  correspond  with  the  candidates  for  the 
presidency  and  the  vice-presidency  of  the  United  States ; 
and  that  each  ward  elect  five  delegates  to  meet  in  con- 
vention on  the  third  Monday  in  May. 

About  this  time,  the  General  Trades  Union  concluded 
to  publish  a  newspaper  to  advocate  the  social  rights  and 
interests  of  the  mechanics  generally.  This  paper,  "  The 
Union,"  was  placed  under  the  editorial  charge  of  John 
Commerford,  then  president  of  the  Trades  Union,  and 
one  of  the  earliest  of  the  anti-monopolists. 

John  Commerford  was  the  author  of  an  able  elaborated 


52  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

review  of  Chief  Justice  Savage's  opinion  in  the  case  of 
the  state  against  some  shoe  makers  of  Geneva,  for  a  con- 
spiracy to  raise  the  wages  of  their  labor.  He  is  a  mechanic, 
of  considerable  talent  as  a  political  speaker,  but  more 
as  a  writer.  In  after  years,  we  find  him  the  author  of 
"  An  Address  to  the  Workingmen  of  New  York,"  pre- 
vious to  the  presidential  election  of  1840,  and  probably 
the  ablest  production  of  the  kind  that  has  appeared  in 
the  United  States.  He  is  the  man  John  C.  Calhoun 
alluded  to  on  another  occasion,  in  the  Senate  of  the 
United  States,  in  the  following  words ;  "  the  petition  he 
presented,  was  drawn  up  with  ability  by  a  mechanic,  as  he 
was  assured,  but  whose  good  sense  and  discriminating  judg- 
ment would  do  him  credit  in  this  or  any  other  body."  It 
must  be  added,  as  a  commentary  on  all  this,  that  his  inde- 
pendence of  mind  is  not  agreeable  to  expedient  politicians, 
nor  those  who  have  influence  in  the  disposal  of  office.  His 
political  leaders  must  be  men  of  real,  not  factitious,  supe- 
riority, or  he  won't  follow ;  they  must  be  of  the  true 
Democratic  faith  and  practice,  or  he  will  speak  out.  As 
an  opponent,  he  is  open,  and  as  a  friend  he  has  the  very 
rare  merit  of  being  a  better  and  kinder  friend  in  adver- 
sity than  in  prosperity. 

The  "  Union"  took  as  large  a  scope  in  politics  as  the 
committee  in  whose  charge  it  was  placed  would  permit ; 
and  it  took  strong  ground  in  behalf  of  those  journeymen 
tailors  who  were  prosecuted  and  found  guilty  for  "  a  con- 
spiracy against  trade  and  commerce,  and  the  peace,  safety, 
and  dignity  of  the  State  of  New  York," — in  plain  Eng- 
lish, "  a  strike  to  raise  wages,"  but  in  this  case,  we  believe, 
it  was  a  strike  to  prevent  the  employers  from  reducing  them 
down.  This  produced,  in  June,  a  Park  meeting  of  me- 
chanics, and  a  call  for  a  state  convention  to  mee*.  at  Utica 
on  the  15th  of  September.  The  reader  will  find  that 
the  anti-monopolists  subsequently  united  in  seconding  this 
call  for  a  state  convention,  and  that  they  adopted  this  one 
as  their  own. 

It  remains  to  be  mentioned,  before  concluding  this 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  53 

chapter,  that  the  Monopoly  Nominating  Committee, 
which  nominated  at  Tammany  Hall,  October,  1835,  the 
tickets  headed  Gideon  Lee  for  Congress  and  John  I. 
Morgan  for  Assembly,  sent  up  a  petition  to  the  legisla- 
ture to  charter  more  banks  and  banking  capital.  The 
petitioners  sent  their  memorial  not  as  private  citizens,  but 
as  the  Nominating  Committee  of  the  New  York  city  dele- 
gation. The  members  from  the  city,  in  obedience  to  their 
nominators,  urged  the  business  effectually,  and  the  num- 
ber of  banks  chartered,  and  that  had  their  capital  increased 
during  the  session,  amounted  to  thirteen. 

The  Loco-Focos  took  this  matter  up,  and  denounced 
the  petition  so  far  as  it  assumed  any  political  authority, 
coming  from  a  Nominating  Committee,  superior  to  that 
of  private  citizens.  After  stating  the  case,  the  resolu- 
tions went  on  :  "  Are  our  legislators  directly  responsible 
to  the  committee  and  only  indirectly  to  the  people? 
What  are  the  usages,  then,  but  a  substitution  of  the 
French  electoral  system,  instead  of  the  Democratic 
American  1"  "  But,"  added  another  part  of  the  pro- 
ceedings, "  as  the  Apostle  Peter  denied  his  master,  so 
have  the  saints  of  Tammany  denied  the  principles  of 
pure  Democracy,  and  having  imitated  one  apostle,  may 
they  be  forgiven  when  the  follow  the  example  of  another, 
the  initials  of  whose  name  are  Judas  Iscariot." 

"  Nevertheless,"  continued  these  Reformers,  "  we 
rejoice  in  the  dawn  of  a  brighter  era  in  our  political  his- 
tory ;  when  we  shall  not  behold  the  degrading  spectacle 
of  a  Democratic  Republican  people  contending  at  the 
polls  about  candidates  only,  sacrificing  in  a  mad  zeal  for 
individuals  all  consideration  of  the  rights  and  interests  of 
millions.  The  watchwords  at  our  elections  will  yet  be, 
"  Democratic  principles  and  measures,"  "  No  charters  of 
exclusive  privileges ;  for  they  are  monopolies,  contrary 
to  the  great  charter  of  Cod  to  all  mankind." 

Many  extracts  could  be  given  showing  the  living  hope 
— the  abiding  faith  of  these  true  Christian  Democrats. 
Sufficient  has  been  adduced  to  disprove  the  mendacious 
5* 


64  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

charges  of  the  Federal  Whig  and  Monopoly  Democratic 
presses  against  the  friends  of  Equality  of  Rights.  But 
neither  parties,  presses,  nor  individuals  may  hope  to  do 
evil  with  impunity,  or  that  good  will  result  from  it.  That 
retributive  power  is  ever  active  which  brings  to  men's 
own  lips  the  poisoned  cup  they  prepared  for  others. 
How  dim-sighted  were  the  Albany  Argus,  the  Richmond 
Enquirer,  the  Washington  Globe,  and  the  other  Demo- 
cratic Republican  editors,  that  they  could  not  foresee  that 
all  the  charges  of  "  Agrarian  spirit,"  "  Jack  Cadeism," 
destructiveness,  &c.,  which  they  invented  and  so  liberally 
applied  to  the  Equal  Rights  Democracy,  would  come  home 
to  themselves  with  accumulated  interest  in  future  years  ! 


CHAPTER    IV. 

County  Convention  to  correspond  with  Presidential  Candidates — 
Remarks — Report  of  the  Correspondence — That  of  the  minority  of 
the  Committee  adopted — Debate — Resolution  laid  on  the  table — 
A  Compromise — Correspondence  with  Col.  Samuel  Young — Re- 
marks— Reply  to  Col.  Young — Remarks  respecting  the  Union 
and  the  Democrat. 

Every  Candidate  shall  be  required  to  sign  the  Declaration  of  Principles  and  such  writ- 
ten pledge  as  the  meeting  may  frame.— ART.  VIII.  CONSTIT.  or  ORGANIZATION. 

THE  County  Convention  to  correspond  with  the  candi- 
dates for  the  presidency  and  vice  presidency  of  the  United 
States,  and  also  to  call  a  state  convention,  met  on  the 
16th  of  May,  and  organized  by  electing  Edward  G.  Bar- 
ney as  president,  Daniel  Gorham  and  B.  F.  Hallock 
as  vice  presidents,  and  James  L.  Stratton  and  John  A. 
Riell  as  secretaries. 

The  following  is  a  list  of  the  delegates  : 

3d  Ward.— John  Watkins,  Doctor  Gray,  John  A.  Riell, 
George  Curtis,  Charles  Dingley. 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  55 

4th  Ward.— John  H.   Lee,  Daniel   C.  Pentz,  Gilbert 

Vail,  Wm.  E.  Skidmore,  Richard  Cooke. 
5th  Ward. — F.   S.   Cozzens,  Orrin   Stoughton,  James 

Locklin,  Wm.  Derrickson,  Henry  Curtis. 
6th  Ward. — Paul  M.  Durando,  George  Brown,  Rodney 

S.  Church,  Alexander  F.  Vache. 
7th  Ward. — Edward  M.  Luther,  Robert  Hogbin,  Edward 

G.  Barney,  Daniel  Gorham,  John  M.  Ferrier. 
8th  Ward. — Moses  Jaques,  Thomas  Dyer,  John  Bogert, 

F.  Byrdsall,  Ephraim  Furnis. 

10th  Ward.— Alexander  Ming,  Jr.,  Levi  D.  Slamm,  War- 
den Hay  ward,  Thomas  G.Fenwick,  Charles  Hunter. 
llth  Ward.— B.  F.  Hallock,  Hugh  Collins,  P.  B.  Smith, 

James  L.  Stratton,  James  M.  Crocheron. 
13th  Ward. — Asa  Onderdonk,  Mathias  Hanlon,  Edward 
McKeeby,  John  Commerford,  Abraham  Van  Gelden. 
Uth  Ward.— Wm.  F.  Piatt,  Stephen  Hasbrouck,  Thomas 

Dorsett,  E.  D.  Truesdell,  S.  J.  Pooley. 
15th  Ward.—E.  G.  Webb,  Dr.  Clement,  James  N.  Ryan, 
E.  W.  Graham,  Elijah  Fisher. 

The  convention  passed  a  resolution  that  no  delegate  be 
allowed  to  vote,  unless  he  had  signed,  or  signs,  the  decla- 
ration of  principles. 

A  committee  of  five  persons  was  decided  on,  to  corre- 
spond with  candidates  for  the  presidential  election,  and 
Messrs.  Vache,  Jaques,  Hasbrouck,  Ming  and  Graham 
were  chosen  as  that  committee. 

This  committee  reported  its  correspondence  with  R.  M. 
Johnson  to  the  convention,  at  its  meeting  July  7th.  It 
was  received  with  the  warmest  approbation  and  ordered 
to  be  published.  On  the  18th  July  its  correspondence 
with  Mr.  Van  Buren  was  reported.  His  letter  was  un- 
satisfactory and  its  publication  met  with  opposition.  It 
was  carried  however,  by  fourteen  ayes  to  nine  noes. 

This  convention  did  not  close  its  labors  until  the  latter 
end  of  July,  and  it  held  no  less  than  sixteen  meetings. 
The  protracted  existence  of  this  body,  was  owing  to  Mr. 


56  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

Van  Buren's  letter.  It  is  very  probable  he  intended  it  for 
a  very  conciliatory  production ;  if  he  did,  he  entirely  fail- 
ed in  his  design,  for  it  neither  excited  placable  feelings 
towards  himself,  nor  harmony  amongst  those  to  whom  it 
was  addressed. 

A  committee  of  three  was  appointed,  Messrs.  Hayward, 
Crocheron  and  Byrdsall,  to  draft  a  report  of  the  proceed- 
ings of  the  convention,  to  be  presented  to  the  general 
county  meeting.  The  majority  of  this  committee,  Hay- 
ward  and  Crocheron,  brought  in  a  report  which  was 
accepted  and  laid  on  the  table.  The  minority  report, 
(F.  Byrdsall's)  was  then  taken  up  and  adopted  by  the 
convention.  It  is  now  presented  to  the  reader. 

1.  The  Convention  of  delegates  (elected  and  convened,  pursuant  to  a 
resolution  passed  at  the  general  meeting  of  the  Democratic  party  of 
the  city  and  county  of  New  York,  opposed  to  all  monopolies,  held  on 
the    15th  of  April,  1836,)  having   attended  to  the  duties  assigned 
to  it,  respectfully  request  leave  to  report : 

2.  On  the  subject  of  the  first  part  of  the  resolution,  viz:  to  re- 
commend a  State  Convention,  diversities  of  opinion  have  manifested 
themselves  as  to  the  practicability  and  utility  of  it.  As  respects  its  be- 
ing practicable,  although  there  is  evidence  that  the  principles   and 
reforms  advocated  by  the  anti-monopoly  democracy  have,  in  all  parts 
of  the  state,  numerous  friends  and  talented  advocates,  yet  there  is  not 
any  organization  of  the  real  democracy,  and  it  would  consequently 
require  much  time  to  disseminate  circulars,  interchange  sentiment  and 
produce  concert  of  action,  necessary  to  the  accomplishing  of  a  State 
Convention. 

3.  As  to  the  utility  of  a  State  Convention  at  this  juncture,  it  is 
held  by  several  to  be  somewhat  questionable,  for  the  reason  that  there 
will  be  a  general  convention  of  mechanics  and  working  men  at  Utica 
on  the  15th  of  September  next,  and  being  satisfied  that  their  objects 
and  measures  must  necessarily  be  founded  on  the  same  principles,  and 
in  favor  of  the  same  reforms  in  government,  as  are  urged  by  the  anti- 
monopoly  democracy, — Equal  Rights,  Equal  Laws,  and  Equal  Justice, 
it  is  therefore  believed  that  the  one  convention,  will  supercede  the 
necessity  of  the  other. 

4.  With  regard  to    the  second  part  of  the  resolution,  viz  :  to  ad- 
dress the  candidates  for  the  Presidency  and  Vice  Presidency  of  the 
United  States,  on  the  subject  of  the  principles  and  reforms  advocated 
by  the  Equal  Rights  Democracy,  your  convention  has  corresponded 
with  the  nominees  of  the  Baltimore  Convention  exclusively,  because 
either  the  consistency,  or  the  ability,  or  the  democratic  faith  of  the 
other  candidates,  is  a  matter  of  great  doubt  in  the  minds  of  the  people. 

5.  This  convention  acknowledges  with  the  highest  gratification, 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  57 

that  the  communication  received  from  Richard  M.  Johnson,  already 
published  and  herewith  submitted,  is  in  full  accordance  with  our  De- 
claration of  Principles,  of  which  it  is  an  able  and  happily  expressed 
exposition.  The  frank  unlimited  avowal  of  his  political  tenets,  is 
alike  honorable  to  him  as  a  sincere  democrat,  a  true  patriot  and 
honest  man. 

6.  But  the  same  encomiums  cannot  be  justly  applied  to  the  an- 
swer received  from  the  candidate  for  the  presidency,  Martin  Van 
Buren,  and  which  has  also  been  published.  It  is  evasive,  unsatis- 
factory, and  unworthy  of  a  great  statesman.  The  world,  however, 
will  judge  of  the  motives  which  dictated  it. 

The  correspondence  is  as  herewith  submitted. 

NEW  YORK,  June  13, 1836. 
Col.  R.  M.  Johnson : 

SIR  : — As  a  Committee  of  a  General  Convention  of  the  Demo- 
cratic party  of  the  city  and  county  of  New  York,  in  favor  of  Equal 
Rights  and  opposed  to  all  monopolies,  we  are  instructed  to  submit  to 
your  consideration,  as  the  candidate  of  the  Baltimore  Convention,  for 
the  office  of  Vice  President  of  the  United  States,  the  following  Dec- 
laration of  Principles,  adopted  by  those  whom  the  delegates  have  the 
honor  to  represent. 

DECLARATION  OF  PRINCIPLES. 

We,  whose  names  are  hereunto  affixed,  do  associate  ourselves  and 
unite,  for  the  purpose  of  effecting  Constitutional  Reform  in  Legisla- 
tion, and  to  bring  into  practice  the  principles  on  which  the  govern- 
ments of  these  United  States  were  originally  founded.  We  utterly 
disclaim  any  intention  or  design  of  instituting  any  new  party,  but 
declare  ourselves  the  original  Democratic  party,  our  whole  object 
being  political  reformation  by  reviving  the  landmarks  and  principles 
of  Democracy.  We  therefore  hold  with  the  revered  Jefferson,  that 

1  st.  "  The  true  foundation  of  Republican  Government  is  the  equal 
rights  of  every  citizen,  in  his  person  and  property,  and  in  their  man- 
agement." 

2d.  "  The  rightful  power  of  all  legislation  is  to  declare  and  enforce 
only  our  natural  rights  and  duties,  and  to  take  none  of  them  from  us. 
No  man  has  a  natural  right  to  commit  aggression  on  the  equal  rights 
of  another ;  and  this  is  ALL  from  which  the  law  ought  to  restrain  him. 
Every  man  is  under  the  natural  duty  of  contributing  to  the  necessities 
of  society,  and  this  is  all  the  law  should  enforce  on  him.  When  the 
laws  have  declared  and  enforced  all  this,  they  have  fulfilled  their 
functions." 

3d.  "  The  idea  is  quite  unfounded  that  on  entering  into  society,  we 
give  up  any  natural  right." 

4th.  Unqualified  and  uncompromising  hostility  to  bank  notes  and 
paper  money  as  a  circulating  medium,  because  gold  and  silver  is  the 
only  safe  and  constitutional  currency. 

5th.  Hostility  to  any  and  all  monopolies  by  legislation,  because 
they  are  a  violation  of  the  equal  rights  of  The  People. 


58  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

6th.  Hostility  to  the  dangerous  and  unconstitutional  creation  of 
vested  rights  by  legislation,  because  they  are  a  usurpation  of  the  peo- 
ple's sovereign  rights.  And  we  hold  that  all  laws  or  acts  of  incorpo- 
ration passed  by  one  legislature  can  be  rightfully  altered  or  repealed 
by  their  successors. 

In  requesting  an  expression  of  your  opinion  in  relation  to  them,  as 
early  as  may  be  consistent  with  your  other  avocations,  we  are  desired 
by  the  Convention  to  add  the  assurance  of  their  high  appreciation  of 
your  political  course,  and  the  most  profound  respect  and  esteem,  which 
they  entertain  for  you  as  a  man. 

ALEXANDER  F.  VACHE',      STEPHEN  HASBROUCK, 
E.  W.  GRAHAM,  M.  JAQUES, 

ALEX.  MING,  Jr. 

Answer  of  R.  M.  Johnson. 

WASHINGTON,  June  24,  1836. 

GENTLEMEN: — I  have  the  honor  to  acknowledge  the  receipt  of 
your  letter  of  the  13th  inst.,  enclosing  the  report  and  constitution  of 
the  Democratic  Convention  in  New  York,  and  submitting  to  my  con- 
sideration the  Declaration  of  Principles  which  it  contains. 

In  contemplating  man  in  a  state  of  nature,  I  have  not  been  in  the 
habit  of  regarding  him  as  a  solitary,  but  as  a  social  being.  We  come 
not  into  existence  in  a  state  of  solitude ;  but  the  commencement  of 
our  being  is  in  the  society  of  our  kind,  and  in  a  state  of  entire  depend - 
ance  upon  our  seniors. 

A  state  of  infancy  is,  therefore,  by  the  law  of  nature,  a  state  of  sub- 
jection, and  its  government  patriarchal.  When  infancy  is  past,  our 
associations  assume  a  different  character.  For  most  of  the  conven- 
iences, and  for  many  of  the  necessaries  of  life,  we  are  still  dependent 
On  one  another ;  but  that  dependance  is  reciprocal,  and  therefore  it 
imposes  no  obligations,  and  confers  no  privileges  on  one  class  or  indi- 
vidual which  are  not  common  to  all.  No  one  has  a  natural  right  to 
interrupt  another  in  the  enjoyment  of  "  life,  liberty  and  the  pursuit 
of  happiness,"  according  to  his  own  volition ;  and  if  man  were  not 
depraved,  there  would  be  no  necessity  for  human  laws  or  government, 
to  secure  him  in  the  enjoyment  of  these  natural  rights.  To  restrain 
the  licentiousness  of  those  who  would  invade  these  rights,  is  the  sole 
object  of  legitimate  government.  All  beyond  this  is  usurpation.  In 
defining  the  rules  to  be  observed  in  securing  this  object,  every  man 
in  society  is  by  nature  equal,  and  entitled  to  an  equal  voice  ;  and  the 
obligation  to  contribute  to  the  expenses  and  services  necessary  to  the 
protection  and  support  of  the  institutions  by  which  those  rights  are 
guarded  is  equally  universal.  These  principles  I  conceive  to  be  im- 
mutable and  the  corollary  is  plain,  that  the  natural  rights  and  obliga- 
tions of  citizens  of  the  same  community  are  equal  and  universal. 
The  rights  of  no  class  can  be  relinquished,  nor  the  obligations  dis- 
solved, without  injustice  and  oppression. 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO    PARTY.  59 

This  you  will  understand  as  expressing  my  views  in  approbation  of 
the  three  first  paragraphs  of  the  Declaration  of  principles.  On  the 
others,  I  believe  all  the  acts  of  my  public  life  have  shown  my  opposi- 
tion to  all  monopolies  and  vested  rights.  Our  natural  rights  are  suffi- 
cient, and  a  legislative  body  cannot  create  others.  To  confer  upon 
any  man,  or  body  of  men,  an  exclusive  power  to  exercise  them,  is 
only  to  deprive  the  rest  of  the  community  of  those  rights.  The 
influence  which  any  man,  or  voluntary  association  of  men,  may 
gain  by  their  success  in  any  kind  of  business,  will  always  be  suffi- 
ciently great  and  sufficiently  dangerous,  without  the  recognition  of 
law,  or  the  special  favor  of  government.  Every  generation  of  men 
acts  for  itself,  and  is  uncontrolled  by  the  acts  of  the  former  generation  ; 
so  every  legislature  acts  for  its  constituents,  with  the  same  power  and 
prerogative  that  its  predecessor  possessed ;  and  no  act  of  one  legisla- 
ture can  of  right  curtail  the  powers  of  its  successor.  Therefore, 
except  in  the  fulfilment  of  lawful  contracts,  such  as  the  reimburse- 
ment of  debts  contracted,  or  payment  for  services  performed,  any 
act  of  one  legislature  may  be  repealed  by  a  subsequent  legislature. 
The  preservation  of  public  faith  in  legislative  acts,  is  a  duty,  and  be- 
yond this,  the  obligation  of  one  legislative  body  cannot  devolve 
upon  another.  All  obligations  are  reciprocal,  and  as  the  acts  of  the 
present  legislature  cannot  revert,  so  the  acts  of  the  former  cannot 
bind  the  present. 

I  have  considered  it  an  unfortunate  circumstance  that  we  are  be- 
come a  banking  nation.  If  the  original  proposition  could  recur,  I 
should  hope  that  the  decision  would  be  given  unqualifiedly  against 
the  introduction  of  any  other  circulating  medium,  than  that  of  specie. 
A  paper  circulation  by  increasing  the  amount,  lessens  its  nominal 
value,  and  the  banks  derive  the  benefit. 

If  the  evil  cannot  be  eradicated  immediately,  we  should  endeavor 
by  all  honorable  means  to  prevent  its  extension,  in  the  hope  that  pub- 
lic sentiment  will  eventually  become  so  universally  in  favor  of  the 
specie  medium,  that  without  a  general  shock  to  all  public  confidence 
"  the  golden  age"  may  be  restored. 

With  great  respect  and  esteem, 

Your  friend  and  fellow  citizen, 

R.  M.  JOHNSON. 
•Answer  of  M.  Van  Bur  en. 

WASHINGTON,  July  6th,  1836. 

GENTLEMEN  : — I  have  had  the  honor  to  receive  your  letter  with  an 
accompanying  "  Declaration  of  Principles,"  adopted  by  a  "  general 
convention  of  the  democratic  party  of  the  city  and  county  of  New 
York,  in  favor  of  Equal  Rights  and  opposed  to  all  monopolies,"  and 
return  you  my  sincere  thanks  for  this  mark  of  your  respect.  In  the 
great  principle  with  which  you  set  out,  viz.  "  That  the  true  founda- 
tion of  republican  government  is  the  Equal  right  of  every  citizen,  in 
his  person,  in  his  property,  and  in  their  management,"  I  fully  concur, 
and  honor  and  respect  all  temperate  and  well  directed  efforts  to  pro- 
tect and  enforce  it.  For  my  views  in  regard  to  the  other  propositions 
contained  in  the  Declaration,  and  especially  to  those  which  relate  to 


60  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

the  subject  of  banks  and  paper  money,  specie  currency  aad  monopo- 
lies, you  must  allow  me  to  refer  you  to  a  public  course  of  no  incon- 
siderable duration  in  the  state  and  federal  government,  and  to  a  suc- 
cession of  public  declarations  heretofore  made  by  me.  On  some  of 
the  latter  subjects,  I  shall  also  have  an  occasion  for  a  further  public 
expression  of  my  opinions,  in  reply  to  a  call  made  upon  me  before  the 
receipt  of  your  letter. 

To  these  acts  and  expressions,  I  respectfully  invite  your  candid 
consideration,  and  if  they  should  be  found  to  bring  my  principles  suffi- 
ciently near  to  those  you  espouse,  to  entitle  me  to  your  confidence,  I 
shall  be  proud  of  possessing  it. 

Accept,  gentlemen,  my  thanks  for  the  kind  expressions  contained  in 
your  letter,  and  believe  me  to  be  very  respectfully, 
Your  obedient  servant, 

M.  VAN  BUREN. 

7.  The  convention  adds,  that  the  8th  articie  of  the  constitution  of 
organization,  and  a  recorded  resolution  passed  on  the  20th  Jan.  1836, 
prohibit  our  support  of  any  candidate  who  will  not  avow  his  entire 
concurrence  with  the  Declaration  of  Principles.  The  letter  of  R.  M. 
Johnson  is  amply  satisfactory,  while  that  of  M.  Van  Buren  is  not  so, 
to  any  true  democrat. 

The  constitution  of  the  United  States,  in  this  case  leaves  us  only  a 
choice  of  evils,  as  respects  the  presidential  election,  viz  :  cither  to 
give  up  the  fundamental  tenet  and  objects  of  our  organization,  or  not 
vote  at  all,  and  thereby  withdraw  our  support  from  R.  M.  Johnson, 
the  man  whom  we  would  delight  to  honor. 

Such  alternatives  exhibit  the  anomalous  absurdity  of  that  clumsy 
aristocratic  machinery,  called  the  electoral  college,  by  which  citizens 
are  deprived  of  the  right  of  voting  directly  for  officers,  in  whose  hands 
the  government  is  placed,  and  particularly  where  that  right  is  clearest 
and  strongest,  as  in  the  case  of  the  highest  functionary  in  the  repub- 
lic, where  legislative  power  is  united  with  the  executive. 

Your  convention  therefore  strenuously  recommends  that  memorials 
be  constantly  and  perseveringly  presented,  until  the  constitution  be 
so  amended,  that  the  citizen  can  vote  directly  in  the  election  of  the 
President  and  Vice  President  of  the  United  States.  " 

The  foregoing  report  and  accompanying  correspondence 
elicited  much  excitement  and  debate  in  several  meetings 
of  the  convention,  upon  the  sixth  clause  referring  to  M. 
Van  Buren's  letter.  That  body  adopted  it  however,  on 
30th  of  July,  and  passed  a  resolution  that  each  member 
sanction  the  Report,  by  signing  his  name  to  it.  It  was 
also  adopted  by  the  General  County  Meeting,  on  August 
the  first  following,  but  not  without  an  excited  contest.  A 
resolution  to  support  M.  Van  Buren  and  R.  M.  Johnson, 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  61 

was  laid  on  the  table.  Finally,  the  combatants  came  to 
a  compromise — that  the  party  would  adopt  no  presidential 
ticket,  but  that  each  member  be  left  to  make  his  own 
choice.  It  so  resulted,  that  the  uncompromising  portion 
of  the  anti-monopolists  did  not  vote  any  electoral  ticket 
at  the  ensuing  election. 

About  this  time,  the  correspondence  was  submitted 
which  had  taken  place  between  Col.  Samuel  Young,  and 
the  committee  appointed  to  notify  him  of  his  having  been 
nominated  on  the  4th  of  July,  as  the  candidate  of  the  anti- 
monoply  party  for  the  office  of  Governor  of  the  State. 
The  committee  addressed  him  the  following  letter : 

NEW  YORK,  July  1836. 
Samuel  Young,  Esqr. 

SIR  : — At  a  general  meeting  of  the  Democratic  Party  of  the  city 
and  county  of  New  York  in  favor  of  Equal  Rights  and  opposed  to  all 
monopolies,  the  undersigned  were  appointed  a  special  committee  for  the 
purpose  of  transmitting  to  you  the  following  Declaration  of  Principles, 
and  requesting  an  expression  of  your  opinion  in  relation  to  them,  as 
early  as  may  suit  your  convenience. 

Should  these  principles  meet  your  approbation,  the  committee  is  in- 
structed to  tender  you  a  spontaneous  nomination  for  the  office  of  Gov- 
ernor of  the  State,  and  to  assure  you  of  the  undivided  support  of  the 
party  they  represent,  at  the  ensuing  election. 

In  conclusion,  the  committee  take  great  pleasure  in  conveying  to 
you  the  high  sense  which  their  constituents  entertain  of  your  political 
course,  and  the  confidence  they  repose  in  the  m%ral  firmness  of  your 
character,  as  an  individual  and  a  Statesman. 
With  great  respect  and  esteem, 

G.  W.  MATSELL,      DANL.  GORHAM, 

F.  BYRDSALL,  JOHN  DRINKER, 

JOHN  WINDT. 

CoZ.  Young's  Reply. 

BALLSTON,  July,  1836. 

GENTLEMEN  : — Your  communication  reached  this  place  soon  after 
its  date,  but  absence  from  home  and  pre-engagements,  prevented  my 
earlier  attention  to  it. 

As  a  committee,  >ou  have  stated  six  propositions,  and  inform  me 
that  should  they  meet  my  approbation,  you  are  instructed  to  tender  me 
a  spontaneous  nomination  for  the  office  of  Governor  of  the  State. 

Before  I  advert  to  the  principles  which  you  have  communicated, 
permit  me  distinctly  and  unequivocally  to  decline  the  nomination  to 
•which  you  allude.  I  should  be  extremely  reluctant  to  accept  such 
6 


62  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

nomination,  were  it  offered  me  by  the  united  Democracy  of  the  State  ; 
and  during  the  pendency  of  a  Presidential  contest,  where  union  alone 
is  strength,  I  should  feel  that  any  step  calculated  to  divide  the  Dem- 
ocratic family,  would  be  tantamount  to  a  dereliction  of  principle. 
You  doubtless  supposed  that  whoever  may  be  your  candidate,  would 
be  adopted  by  the  whole  party  ;  but  this  I  consider  to  be  extremely 
questionable.  The  country  has  the  same  claims  to  be  considered  as 
the  city.  The  rights  and  duties  of  each  to  the  other  are  reciprocal, 
and  any  thing  which  should  appear  dictatorial  in  the  one,  would  be 
repelled  by  the  other. 

On  one  subject,  I  think  from  my  situation  I  can  judge  better  than 
you ;  it  is  as  to  the  progress  which  your  principles  in  favor  of  Equal 
Rights  and  opposed  to  all  monopolies  are  making  in  the  country.  I 
know  that  these  piinciples  are  steadily  advancing  in  many  parts  of 
the  State.  I  earnestly  wish  them  success,  and  I  fear  by  adopting  an 
exclusive  and  distict  organization  at  the  coming  election,  you  may  re- 
tard their  progress. 

On  looking  for  the  last  few  years  at  the  old  world,  and  particularly 
at  the  country  from  which  most  of  us  derive  our  origin,  I  have  been 
extremely  gratified  to  perceive  that  the  rugged  features  of  the  feudal 
system  are  gradually  crumbling  away,  that  human  rights  and  rational 
liberty  are  emerging  from  the  ruins,  and  that  the  period  for  the  adop- 
tion of  Equal  laws  is  probably  near  at  hand. 

Our  course  however  as  a  state  during  the  same  period,  presents  a 
sickening  contrast.  We  have  departed,  and  are  continually  depart- 
ing from  the  simplicity  of  those  principles,  which  were  the  price  of 
our  fathers'  blood.  The  few  are  gradually  monopolizing  the  rights 
of  the  many,  and  legislation  has  become  the  subject  of  bargain  and 
sale,  of  venality  and  corruption.  I  say  this  deliberately,  and  after 
twenty-five  years  of  observation  and  experience. 

The  increased  protraction  of  the  sessions  of  each  successive  legis- 
lature, and  the  constant  multiplication  of  private  and  partial  laws, 
indicate  an  approximation  to  that  state  of  decadence,  which  is  so 
strongly  and  truly  portrayed  in  the  sententious  brevity  of  the  great 
historian,  "  corruptissima  republica  plurima  leges."  Whilst  legisla- 
tion is  directed  as  it  ever  should  be,  to  the  greatest  good  of  the  great- 
est number,  laws  will  be  few  and  simple.  But  in  proportion  as  it  is 
perverted  to  the  corrupt  subserviency  of  stock  jobbers,  speculators 
and  monopolists,  will  it  become  more  intricate,  protracted  and  multi- 
farious. When  the  immutable  truth  is  fully  understood,  that  there  is 
no  possible  way  of  creating  wealth  but  by  productive  labor,  it  is  per- 
fectly apparent  that  the  gains  of  speculators,  and  the  profits  of  mo- 
nopolists, are  extortions  upon  mankind,  in  which  the  few  participate 
at  the  expense  of  the  many. 

Occupied  with  their  private  concerns,  the  great  mass  of  mankind  do 
not  always  bestow  sufficient  attention  to  watch  the  silent  operation 
of  laws,  and  to  trace  the  connection  of  cause  and  effect.  Little  by 
little,  the  aggressions  of  power  steal  unperceived  upon  the  body 
politic,  like  the  debility  of  age  upon  the  human  frame.  Twenty 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  63 

years  ago,  the  legislation  of  the  last  session,  if  it  could  not  have  been 
otherwise  averted,  would  have  aroused  the  whole  community  to  arms. 
The  undeniable  truth  that  all  men  are  born  free,  and  have  equal 
rights  in  the  enjoyment  of  life,  liberty,  property,  and  the  pursuit  of 
happiness,  was  not  then  forgotten  nor  disregarded.  And  a  proposition 
to  tax  the  present,  by  a  multiplication  of  monopolies,  and  the  future 
by  a  hopeless  accumulation  of  debt,  would  have  been  repelled  either 
by  moral  or  physical  force.  The  plan  of  raising  money  by  selling 
their  children — of  collecting  funds  by  imposing  a  mortgage  on  the 
land  and  labor  of  posterity,  did  not  form  the  financial  system  of  our 
forefathers. 

In  the  detestable  robberies  which  ancient  nations  committed  upon 
each  other,  there  was  at  least  a  display  of  bold  and  manly  courage. 
They  met  sword  in  hand,  arid  the  spoils  belonged  to  the  conquerer. 
The  baths,  aqueducts,  temples,  amphitheatres  and  other  internal  im- 
provements of  the  Romans,  were  constructed  by  the  booty  extorted 
from  vanquished  nations.  But  a  demagogue  of  the  present  day, 
backed  by  a  disciplined  lobby  and  a  few  mercenary  presses,  can  rifle 
more  plunder  from  the  unborn,  than  ever  surrounded  the  triumphal 
car  of  a  Roman  General.  Warren  Hastings  at  the  head  of  a  huge  mo- 
nopoly, the  English  East  India  Company,  laid  waste  the  Carnatic,  ex- 
torted the  wealth  and  sacrificed  the  lives  of  its  inhabitants.  But  a 
corporation  of  the  present  time,  without  the  expense  and  risk  of  a 
war,  and  simply  by  corrupting  the  easy  virtue  of  legislatures,  has 
plundered  three  millions  from  future  generations.  Men  enter  into 
the  social  compact  to  obtain  protection  for  themselves  and  posterity, 
but  this  end,  by  the  weakness  and  profligacy  of  rulers,  is  perverted, 
and  the  institution  of  government,  intended  as  a  shield,  is  converted 
into  a  sword.  The  power  of  man  .to  do  mischief  to  his  species,',  s 
infinitely  superior  to  that  of  doing  good.  "A  savage  who  has  not 
the  capacity  to  construct  a  hut,  may  nevertheless  demolish  a  temple." 
The  visitations  of  Providence  though  often  severe,  are  of  short  dura- 
tion, and  the  most  durable  of  all  sublunary  evils  are  the  inflictions  of 
human  government.  The  late  disastrous  fire  in  your  city  will  soon  be 
forgotten  ;  the  tears  and  terrors  inflicted  by  the  ravages  of  the  cholera 
have  nearly  passed  away,  but  the  curse  of  bad  legislation,  is  like  the 
undying  worm.  If  the  quantum  of  evil  is  to  be  estimated  by  a  com- 
pound ratio  of  its  intensity  and  duration,  I  have  no  hesitation  in 
saying,  that  had  the  recent  legislature,  instead  of  the  laws  of  the  last 
session,  adopted  and  enforced  the  edict  of  Herod,  less  misery  would 
have  resulted  to  the  human  race. 

Odious  and  detestable  as  are  monopolies,  they  merely  impose  a 
tax  on  the  living ;  and  men  if  they  will,  may  sell  themselves  for  slaves 
and  rivet  their  own  chains.  But  to  inflict  slavery  and  taxation  upon 
those  who  are  to  come  after  us,  is  an  exhibition  of  fraud,  inhumanity 
and  cowardice,  at  which  every  honorable  feeling  revolts.  Animals 
protect  their  young  from  harm  with  instinctive  solicitude.  Man 
alone  sells  his  offspring  to  speculators  and  monopolists,  and  this  by 
a  gross  desecration  of  terms,  is  denominated  by  the  demagogues  of  the 
day  « Internal  Improvement." 


64  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

Under  none  but  a  mild  and  free  government,  can  the  moral  and 
intellectual  powers  of  man  expand  to  their  fullest  amplitude.  Con- 
stantly surrounded  by  obstructions  and  beset  by  temptations,  his 
advances,  under  the  most  favorable  circumstances,  are  extremely  slow. 
What,  then,  should  be  said  of  him  who  would  project  chains  into  the 
future,  and  superadd  to  the  ordinary  ills  of  life,  the  curse  of  grevious 
and  perpetual  taxation  ? 

But  it  is  time  that  my  suggestions  were  brought  to  a  close.  I  fully 
concur  in  most  of  the  principles  you  have  stated.  There  is  one,  how- 
ever, the  fourth,  to  which  I  am  not  prepared  to  assent.  Under  my 
present  impressions,  I  would  not  wholly  exclude  paper  as  a  circulat- 
ing medium.  Without  sufficient  knowledge  and  experience  of  my 
own  on  this  subject,  I  yield  to  the  opinions  of  such  men  as  Smith  and 
Say,  and  suppose  that  it  may  be  useful  when  rightly  restrained  to 
certain  limits,  but  that  the  amount  of  paper  in  circulation  should 
never  exceed  the  amount  of  specie.  A  repeal  of  the  usury  and 
restraining  laws,  a  proper  limit  of  bank  issues,  and  an  exclusion  from 
circulation  of  all  bills  of  a  less  denomination  than  twenty  dollars, 
would,  as  I  think,  in  a  great  measure,  if  not  entirely,  prevent  those 
contractions  and  expansions — those  sudden  fluctuations  in  prices, 
and  that  demoralizing  mania  of  speculation  with  which  the  commu- 
nity has  been  scourged,  and  which  is  always  calculated  to  injure  the 
productive  classes,  and  to  augment  the  wealth  of  the  rich  and  the 
poverty  of  the  poor. 

You  seem  to  suppose  that  legislative  encroachments  may  be  arrested, 
by  procuring  from  individuals  a  sanction  of  the  principles  you  have 
stated.  Judging  of  the  future  by  the  past,  I  fear  that  this  will  not  be 
sufficient ;  that  while  temptation  exists,  seduction  will  follow,  and 
that  the  only  remedy  is  to  take  away  the  power  of  doing  mischief. 
And  had  you  proposed  to  resort  at  once  to  the  fountain  of  all  political 
power,  to  procure  a  convention  of  the  people  of  the  state  to  remodel 
and  renovate  their  abused  constitution — to  apply  the  sponge  of 
oblivion  to  all  unjust  and  unequal  laws,  and  affix  in  terrorum  the 
impress  of  infamy  upon  their  authors,  and  erect  barriers  for  the  future, 
too  plain  to  be  mistaken  by  ignorance,  and  too  strong  for  human 
cupidity,  I  should  have  had  greater  confidence  in  your  final  success. 
You,  however,  may  perhaps  do  much  to  mitigate  the  evils  of  the 
future  and  to  protract  the  period  when  one  of  those  storms  of  human 
society, which  are  ever  superinduced  by  misgovernment,  shall  pass  over 
this  state. 

I  am,  gentlemen,  &c.,  &c., 

S.  YOUNG. 

The  reading  of  the  foregoing  letter  was  interrupted  by 
frequent  plaudits,  and  though  far  less  conciliatory  in  its 
tone  than  that  of  Martin  Van  Buren,  yet  it  was  warmly 
received,  because  there  was  a  whole-minded  frankness  in 
it,  and  no  holding  back  of  sentiment  or  opinion  ;  and  these 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  65 

qualities  rendered  it  so  acceptable,  that  its  strictures  on 
the  separate  organization  and  movements  of  the  anti- 
monopolists,  were  readily  forgiven.  The  Committee, 
however,  were  instructed  to  write  a  reply  to  Colonel 
Young's  animadversions,  and  the  following  was  approved 
and  forwarded  to  him.  It  was  written  by  F.  Byrdsall. 

Reply  to  Colonel  Young. 

NEW  YORK,  July,  1836. 

Sir, — Your  answer  to  our  letter  of  the  4th  July  last,  has  been  sub- 
mitted to  our  constituents,  and  we  are  instructed  by  them  to  present 
to  you  their  acknowledgments  of  the  gratification  your  republican 
sentiments  has  afforded  them.  We  are  also  instructed  to  make  some 
remarks  in  relation  to  certain  portions  of  your  communication. 

The  reasons  which  induced  us  to  withdraw  from  the  "  leaders"  and 
the  "  usages  of  the  party,"  are  the  same,  as  strong,  and  as  well 
founded  in  principle,  as  those  which  impelled  the  separation  of  the 
American  colonies  from  the  government  of  Great  Britain,  or  as  those 
which  induced  Samuel  Young  to  resign  his  seat  in  the  senate  of  this 
state.  Misgovernment  and  usurpation  in  the  former  instance,  cor- 
ruption and  abuses  of  legislation  in  the  latter. 

The  open  leaders,  the  secret  movers  of  the  party,  and  their  minions, 
comprise  a  body  of  men  whose  political  turpitude  it  would  be  diffi- 
cult to  parallel  in  any  age  or  country.  They  have  used  the  party  for 
their  own  selfish  purposes,  and  are  either  at  the  head,  or  participat- 
ing in  the  legalized  spoils  of  every  existing  monopoly.  These  char- 
tered Democrats,  with  the  assistance  of  a  secret  society,  hired  presses, 
the  slaves  of  office  and  the  "  known  usages,"  can  always  caucus  and 
pack  the  General  and  Nominating  Committees  to  promote  the  objects 
of  aristocracy.  In  fact,  the  Hamiltonian  doctrine  of  building  govern- 
ment on  self-interest,  venality,  and  corruption,  has  been  practically 
illustrated  by  the  leaders  of  the  Democracy  of  this  state,  who  have 
constantly  professed,  and  as  constantly  disregarded  the  political  doc- 
trines of  Jefferson,  the  founder  of  the  original  Democratic  Party. 

Tammany  Hall  has  been  a  nursery  of  brokers,  where  federalists, 
monopolists  and  corruptionists  are  fostered.  The  capitol  has  long 
been  a  manufactory  of  stocks  for  gambling,  at  the  expense  of  the 
rights  and  welfare  of  the  people,  and  the  administrative  department 
of  the  State  exhibited  the  spectacle  of  concocting  and  delivering  a 
democratic  message,  without  the  virtue  or  consistency  of  acting  in 
accordance  with  his  own  reasons  and  recommendations. 

Could  the  honest  democracy  witness  all  these  derilections  of  public 
duty,  violations  of  principles,  abuses  of  government  and  legislative 
usurpations,  and  remain  any  longer  in  the  self-styled  democratic 
party,  without  strengthening  this  mass  of  moral  and  political  iniquity  ? 
It  could  not,  and  therefore  has  totally  seceded  from  Tammany  Hall, 
Tammany  leaders,  and  Tammany  usages. 
6* 

. 


66  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

As  to  the  divisions  in  the  Democratic  family,  one  or  the  other  of 
the  divisions  is  the  democratic  party.  We  claim  to  be  that  party, 
and  we  refer  to  the  fundamental  doctrines  we  advance,  and  the 
measures  we  advocate  as  proof  of  the  claim.  On  the  contrary,  we 
boldly  point  to  the  acts  and  measures  of  the  dominant  faction  of  the 
party,  for  the  last  twenty  years,  and  we  emphatically  demand  if  they 
are  democratic. 

The  pendency  of  a  presidential  contest  is  in  our  opinion,  a  matter 
of  minor  importance,  in  comparison  with  the  tenets  we  sustain,  and 
the  great  objects  of  their  general  diffusion.  The  one  may  be  com- 
pared to  a  temporary  mole-hill,  the  other  to  a  rock  whose  foundations 
are  eternal. 

In  reference  to  your  expressions  in  relation  to  paper  money,  we 
must  declare  ourselves  in  favor  of  a  strict  construction  of  the  consti- 
tution of  the  United  States,  as  respects  the  currency,  in  preference 
to  all  the  theories  of  all  the  political  economists  that  ever  existed. 
Constitutions  or  laws  to  be  right,  must  be  founded  on  those  moral 
and  equitable  principles,  which  are  right  in  every  point  of  view.  If 
it  be  right  to  exclude  from  circulation  all  bank  notes  under  twenty 
dollars,  then  it  is  equally  right  to  exclude  all  above  that  amount. 
If  it  be  right  that  any  part  of  our  currency  should  be  promises  on 
paper,  then  it  is  right  that  all  of  it  should  be  of  the  same  material, 
and  the  promissory  notes  of  companies,  or  of  individuals,  should  be 
subject  to  the  same  general  equal  laws  as  respects  privileges  or  penal- 
ties. Business  considerations,  or  business  arguments,  may  advance 
contrary  positions,  but  if  they  do,  they  must  be  on  the  assumption 
that  business  cannot  prosper  but  at  the  sacrifice  of  the  rights  of  the 
people.  If  so,  then  is  a  democratic  government  only  fit  for  the  re- 
gion of  Utopia,  and  democrats  are  visionaries. 

As  respects  the  great  measure  of  a  convention  to  amend  the  consti- 
tution of  the  state,  we  concur  with  your  views,  except  that  we  deem 
it  essential  to  spread  a  knowledge  of  the  proper  objects  for  which 
governments  are  instituted,  as  a  necessary  preliminary.  We  should 
apprehend  much  mischief  from  the  alterations  or  amendments  of  such 
men  as  composed  our  recent  legislature.  In  the  language  of  Jackson, 
"  we  must  recur  to  first  principles"  before  we  proceed  to  measures  of 
reform.  We  have  done  so,  and  shall  hold  fast  to  our  Declaration  of 
Principles,  as  the  necessary  groundwork  of  reformation  in  govern- 
ment. We  shall  also  maintain  our  democratic  organization,  and 
demand  from  those  who  would  be  our  rulers,  political  candour  and 
political  integrity.  We  would  exercise  a  moral,  not  a  physical  force, 
as  respects  men  and  measures ;  and  so  long  as  our  professions  are 
upheld  by  unswerving  fidelity,  our  onward  course  will  be  irresistible, 
because  public  opinion  in  proportion  to  the  virtue  and  intelligence  of 
the  people,  will  second  our  exertions,  and  the  hearts  of  all  good  and 
wise  men  will  be  with  that  party,  whose  objects  are  political  benefi- 
cence, or  the  happiness  of  the  human  race. 
With  sentiments,  &c.  &c., 

G.  W.  MATSELL,  DANIEL  GORHAM, 

F.  BYRDSALL,  JOHN  DRINKER, 

JOHN  WINDT. 


1336.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  67 

To  revert  back.  It  may  not  be  irrelevant  to  this  his- 
tory to  mention,  that  the  "  Democrat "  ceased  being 
issued  in  June,  and  its  co-laborer,  the  "  Union,"  was 
stopped  in  July.  They  were  both  what  are  called  penny 
papers ;  but  no  subscription  list,  however  large,  can  sus- 
tain a  penny  paper  of  similar  dimensions,  without  adver- 
tising patronage ;  and  this  the  working-people  had  not 
to  bestow.  The  Union  was  never  revived,  but  the  Dem- 
ocrat became  resuscitated  in  September,  and  continued 
under  the  editorial  charge  of  two  gentlemen  until  after 
the  November  election,  when  it  ceased  to  exist  from  that 
time. 


CHAPTER  V. 

State  Convention  at  Utica,  Sept.  15th — Proceedings — Resolution  to 
be  a  distinct  Party  adopted — Nominations  for  Gubernatorial  Can- 
didates— Isaac  S.  Smith,  and  Robert  Townsend,  Jr. — Sketch  of  the 
latter  by  himself — He  declines  the  Nomination — M.  Jaques 
unanimously  nominated — Close  of  the  Convention,  with  Extracts 
from  the  address  to  the  People — Correspondence  with  Isaac  S.  Smith 
and  M.  Jaques. 

*  We,  the  delegates  of  the  Equal  Rights  party,  in  Convention  assembled,  at  Utica, 
do  hereby  solemnly  pledge  to  eacli  other  our  determination  to  adhere  to  our  present 
political  designation,  until  all  the  people  realize  that  Equality  of  Rights  which  we  are 
now  only  permitted  to  contemplate  in  the  distance  with  hope."  HAXTUN. 

>_ 

THE  month  of  August,  1836,  presents  nothing  worthy 
of  note  in  the  annals  of  the  Loco-Focos,  save  the  election 
of  delegates  to  the  State  Convention,  to  meet  in  the  city 
of  Utica,  on  September  15,  1836.  Accordingly,  on  the 
day  appointed,  ninety-three  delegates  from  different  parts 
of  the  state,  assembled :  the  handsome  little  Court  House 
of  that  handsome  city  having  been  freely  offered  for  the 
use  of  the  Convention. 

Robert  Townsend,  Jr.,  of  New- York,  was  elected  Pre- 
sident— John  Colkins,  of  Genesee,  and  E.  Dorchester,  of 


68  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

Oneida,  Vice-Presidents,  and  W.  C.  Foster,  of  Monroe, 
and  J.  C.  McCully,  of  Genesee,  Secretaries. 

The  subject  of  forming  a  separate  party  was  taken  into 
consideration,  and  after  full  and  ample  discussion,  a  pre- 
amble and  resolution,  "  to  institute  a  political  party 
separate  and  distinct  from  all  existing  parties  or  factions 
in  this  State,"  were  unanimously  adopted.  Also,  "  that 
the  name  of  Equal  Rights  party  be,  and  the  same  is 
hereby  adopted,  as  our  political  designation." 

The  declaration  of  principles  of  the  anti-monopolists  of 
New-York  was  then  taken  up,  and  after  some  additions, 
it  was  adopted  under  the  designation  of  the 

"DECLARATION  OF  RIGHTS. 

"  1.  We  hold  these  truths  to  be  self-evident,  that  all  men  are  created 
free  and  equal ;  that  they  are  endowed  by  their  Creator  with  inherent 
inalienable  rights ;  among  which  are  life,  liberty,  and  the  pursuit  of 
happiness. 

"  2.  That  the  true  foundation  of  Republican  Government  is  the 
Equal  Rights  of  every  citizen,  in  his  person  and  property,  and  in  their 
management. 

"  3.  That  the  idea  is  quite  unfounded,  that  on  entering  into  society 
we  give  up  any  natural  right.  The  rightful  power  of  all  legislation 
is  to  declare  and  enforce  only  our  natural  rights  and  duties,  and  to  take 
none  of  them  from  us.  No  man  has  a  natural  right  to  commit  ag- 
gression on  the  equal  rights  of  another ;  and  this  is  all  from  which  the 
law  ought  to  restrain  him.  Every  man  is  under  the  natural  duty  of 
contributing  to  the  necessities  of  society ;  and  this  is  all  the  law 
should  enforce  on  him.  When  the  laws  have  declared  and  enforced 
all  this,  they  have  fulfilled  their  functions. 

"  4.  We  declare  unqualified  hostility  to  bank  notes  and  paper  money 
as  a  circulating  medium,  because  gold  and  silver  is  the  only  safe  and 
constitutional  currency. 

"  5.  Hostility  to  any  and  all  monopolies  by  legislation,  because  thej 
are  violations  of  the  equal  rights  of  the  people. 

"  6.  Hostility  to  the  dangerous  and  unconstitutional  creation  of 
vested  rights,  or  prerogatives  by  legislation,  because  they  are  usurpa- 
tions of  the  people's  sovereign  rights. 

"  7.  That  no  legislative  or  other  authority  in  the  body  politic  can 
rightfully,  by  charter  or  otherwise,  exempt  any  man  or  body  of  men, 
in  any  case  whatever,  from  trial  by  jury  and  the  jurisdiction  or  opera- 
tion of  the  laws  which  govern  the  community. 

"  8.  We  hold  that  each  and  every  law,  or  act  of  incorporation,  passed 
by  preceding  legislatures,  can  be  rightfully  altered  or  repealed  by 
their  successors ;  and  that  they  should  be  altered  or  repealed,  when 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  69 

necessary  for  the  public  good,  or  when  required  by  a  majority  of  the 
people." 

And  Mr.  Haxtun,  of  Rensselaer,  then  submitted  the 
following  resolution,  which  was  adopted  with  great  en- 
thusiasm : 

Resolved — That  we,  the  Delegates  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party,  in 
Convention  assembled  at  Utica,  do  hereby  solemnly  pledge  to  each 
other  our  determination  to  adhere  to  our  present  political  designation, 
until  all  the  people  realize  the  Equality  of  Rights  which  we  are  now 
only  permitted  to  contemplate  in  the  distance  with  hope. 

Having  thus  formed  a  separate  political  party,  the  next 
step  naturally  followed : 

On  motion,  Resolved — That  this  Convention,  in  order  to  promote  the 
organization  of  a  political  party,  separate  and  distinct  from  the  exist- 
ing parties  and  factions  of  this  State,  do  now  nominate  candidates  for 
the  offices  of  Governor  and  Lieutenant  Governor  of  the  State  of  New 
York. 

Several  names  were  then  put  in  nomination,  and  the 
Convention  voted  by  ballot  for  a  candidate  for  Governor. 
Isaac  S.  Smith,  of  Erie  county,  obtained  the  majority,  and 
he  was  consequently  nominated. 

The  Convention  next  proceeded  to  ballot  for  a  candi- 
date for  Lieutenant-Governor;  and  of  the  names  put  in 
nomination,  Robert  Townsend,  Jr.  obtained  the  majority 
of  votes,  and  he  was  of  course  duly  nominated. 

These  nominations  being  made,  the  following  resolu- 
tion was  submitted  and  adopted : 

Resolved,  That  every  candidate  for  any  legislative  or  other  office 
of  importance,  be  required  to  sign  the  Declaration  of  Rights,  and  such 
other  pledge  as  the  people  may  frame  ;  and  that  no  man  be  held  up  or 
supported  by  this  party,  for  any  such  office,  who  shall  not  have  signed 
his  name,  and  declared  his  willingness  to  act  in  accordance  with  the 
same. 

Isaac  S.  Smith,  nominated  by  the  Equal  Rights  Party  as 
their  candidate  for  Governor,  is  a  man  of  well  known 
respectability  and  intelligence.  In  early  manhood,  he 
exhibited  an  act  of  clerical  insubordination,  which  excit- 


70  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

ed  some  prejudice  against  him.  At  a  hotel  or  boarding 
house  where  he  resided,  he  opposed  the  ceremonial  prac- 
tice of  saying  grace,  at  meal  times,  and  this  so  exaspera- 
ted the  Christian  meekness  of  the  divine  who  said  grace, 
or  his  friends,  that  a  prosecution  was  commenced,  which 
was  afterward  very  properly  dropped.  The  progenitors 
of  Mr.  Smith  were  of  the  Society  of  Friends,  and  this  ac- 
counts for  his  opposition  to  the  ceremonial  practice,  as 
well  as  the  clerical  profession.  Be  this  as  it  may,  he  has 
ever  since  been  designated  as  an  infidel ;  but  this  term 
has  been  so  indiscriminately  and  unsparingly  used  by 
sectarian  religionists,  that  it  has  lost  all  precision  of  mean- 
ing, if  it  ever  had  any,  save  that  of  contrariety  of  religious 
belief.  Infidelity  in  these  days,  is  far  less  definite  than 
unorthodox. 

Robert  Townsend,  jr.  nominated  as  candidate  for  Lieu- 
tenant Governor,  addressed  the  Convention  after  his  nomi- 
nation. He  said  he  felt  it  his  duty  to  inform  the  Conven- 
tion who  and  what  he  was,  with  the  hope  that  the  leading 
incidents  of  the  life  of  a  working  man,  would  not  be  with- 
out their  moral  lesson  and  social  use  to  his  fellow  citi- 
zens. His  mother,  a  confiding  girl,  had  been  deceived 
by  a  gentlemen  of  high  respectability,  and  he  wras  born 
an  illegitimate  child.  While  the  world's  law  stigmatized 
him,  nullius  fillius,  the  son  of  nobody,  an  outcast ;  while 
the  morality  of  society  rejected  his  mother  as  an  utterly 
despicable  being,  the  same  code  of  laws  and  mofality 
elevated  his  father  to  the  State  Senate,  and  thus  the  au- 
thor of  his  mother's  shame  and  his  own  odious  birth,  suf- 
fered not,  lost  not  his  caste  in  society,  notwithstanding 
his  real  guilt,  and  the  shame  and  misery  his  heartless 
conduct  inflicted.  Through  his  early  life,  the  hapless 
boy  was  exposed  to  reproach  and  suffering  for  the  fault 
of  others,  and  while  society  accorded  to  him  no  other  pa- 
ternity but  itself,  he  saw  it  ever  ready  as  a  watchful,  as 
an  unfeeling  oppressor,  to  punish  any  derelictions  of  that 
code  of  laws,  of  that  standard  of  morality,  which  fixed 
the  stigma  of  shame  and  infamy  on  himself,  and  his 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  71 

mother,  of  whose  moral  worth  and  native  goodness,  the 
son  gave  energetic  heartfelt  testimony.  He  served  a 
long  apprenticeship  to  a  trade,  and  when  he  arrived  at 
that  fulness  of  youth  that  his  heart  opened  to  all  around, 
he  was  alone  in  the  world ;  society  regarded  him  not,  but 
only  as  it  regarded  itself;  there  was  only  hard  toil  for  him, 
with  no  kindred  genial  associations  of  the  past,  or  pre- 
sent, and  no  bright  prospect  of  any  kind  in  the  future,  to 
cheer  that  toil ;  and  he  became  hopeless — dispirited. 
Such  was  the  text  of  the  sketch  which  he  gave  :  but  it  is 
impossible  to  describe  the  deep  voice — the  deeper  feeling — 
the  graphic  story  of  a  life  such  as  his — the  life  of  a  father- 
less, homeless  working  man,  through  difficulties  and  trials. 
The  whole  was  so  true  to  simple  nature,  so  unffected  and 
affective,  that  no  stage  ever  presented  any  thing  so  truly 
dramatic.  It  produced  deep  sensations  and  tears  amongst 
his  auditors. 

He  declined  the  nomination,  and  Moses  Jaques  was 
unanimously,  but  against  his  wish,  nominated  in  his  stead. 
He  was  prevailed  on  to  accept  the  nomination. 

The  Convention  sat  three  days :  the  forenoons  and  af- 
ternoons were  taken  up  with  proceedings,  and  the  eve- 
nings with  addresses.  A  body  of  more  intelligent  men 
rarely  if  ever  met.  There  was  none  of  that  imposition 
of  having  men  and  things  prepared  before  hand,  for  it 
was  a  real  Convention,  called  together  to  originate,  dis- 
cuss and  decide  what  ought  to  be  done  in  the  great  cause  of 
humanity.  It  issued  an  address  to  the  people,  the  most 
of  which  was  composed  by  M.  Jaques.  The  following 
extracts  are  presented  to  the  reader. 

"  FELLOW  CITIZENS  : — The  Convention  appointed  by  the  farmers, 
mechanics,  and  others  friendly  to  their  views,  in  different  sections  of 
this  State,  to  meet  at  Utica  on  the  15th  of  September,  inst.,  "  in  order 
to  devise  the  best  means  and  measures  of  redress  of  those  wrongs 
and  grievances  which  have  resulted  from  legislative  and  judicial 
usurpations,"  having  duly  deliberated  on  the  various  subjects  sub- 
mitted to  their  consideration,  respectfully  suggest  to  their  fellow- 
citizens  such  measures  of  reform  as  to  them  appear  most  neces- 
sary, to  claim  their  attention  and  support. 


72  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

"  There  are  two  opinions  abroad  in  the  world,  on  the  subject  of 
social  relations  and  the  government  of  man.  The  supporters  of  both 
profess  to  have  the  same  objects  in  view — the  peace,  the  order,  and 
the  happiness  of  the  human  race.  But  as  they  are  founded  on  differ- 
ent views  of  our  nature  and  the  laws  of  the  Creator,  both  cannot  be 
true.  It  is  therefore  of  the  first  importance  that  the  question  should 
be  speedily  settled  in  the  minds  of  this  community. 

"  The  theory  of  the  one  party  is,  that  man,  by  reason  of  his  igno- 
rance, and  of  his  corrupt  nature,  is  not  capable  of  self-government ; 
it  is  therefore  necessary  that  he  should  be  restrained  by  force.  They 
assert  that  the  Creator  in  his  providence  has  produced  a  different  or- 
der of  intelligence  among  men,  and  intended  that  the  most  intelligent 
should  be  the  governors  and  rulers,  as  well  as  the  owners,  and  live 
by  the  labor  of  the  other  portions  of  the  human  family.  Most  of  the 
governments  of  the  old  World  have  been  founded  on  the  above  theory ; 
its  effects  are  well  known,  and  need  not  be  here  enumerated. 

"  The  other  theory  referred  to,  is  that  man  is  a  rational  and  moral 
being,  '  that  all  men  are  created  equal,  and  endowed  by  their  Creator 
with  certain  unalienable  rights.'  That  by  nature  he  is  also  a  social 
being,  and  that  on  entering  into  society  he  does  not  give  up  any  of  his 
natural  rights,  but  to  secure  those  rights  in  their  fullest  enjoyment 
'  governments  are  instituted  among  men,  deriving  their  just  powers 
from  the  consent  of  the  governed.' 

"  The  great  English  law  commentator  from  whom  we  derive  most 
of  our  notions  of  law  has  laid  it  down,  that  (  man  considered  as  a 
creature  must  necessarily  be  subject  to  the  laws  of  his  Creator.' 

"  •  This  will  of  his  maker  is  called  the  law  of  nature,  for  as  God 
when  he  created  man  and  endowed  him  with  free  will  to  conduct 
himself  in  all  parts  of  life,  he  laid  down  certain  immutable  laws  of 
human  nature,  whereby  that  free  will  is  in  some  degree  regulated 
and  restrained,  and  gave  him  also  the  faculty  of  reason  to  discover 
the  purport  of  those  laws.' 

"  {  This  law  of  nature  being  coeval  with  mankind,  and  dictated  by 
God  himself,  is  of  course  superior  in  obligation  to  any  other.  It  is 
binding  over  all  the  globe,  and  in  all  countries  and  at  all  times ;  NO 

HUMAN    LAWS    ARE   OF   ANY   VALIDITY,    IF    CONTRARY    TO    THIS;      and 

such  of  them  as  are  valid  derive  all  their  FORCE  and  all  their  AUTHOR- 
ITY MEDIATELY  or  IMMEDIATELY  from  this  original.' — Blackstone's 
Com.  Vol,  1.  pp.  39,  40,  41. 

"  The  governments  of  these  United  States  were  founded  on  the 
latter  theory,  and  it  is  now  to  be  proved  by  after  experience,  whether 
it  is  capable  of  being  carried  out  in  practice.  Of  one  fact  this  Con- 
vention is  convinced,  and  that  is,  That  most  if  not  all  the  wrongs  and 
evils,  if  not  the  crimes,  in  society,  proceed  from  bad  legislation,  the  in- 
justice of  courts  of  law,  and  the  licentious  and  evil  example  of  rulers. 

"  It  is  a  departure,  in  our  representatives  and  j  udges,  from  the 
laws  of  Nature,  and  the  laws  of  the  Creator,  which  has  produced  the 
derangement  in  the  affairs  of  our  State,  and  which  has  created  the 
necessity  of  our  assembling  here  at  this  time,  to  devise  means  for  the 
redress  of  our  WRONGS. 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  73 

"  The  first  subject  to  which  the  Convention  would  direct  the  atten- 
tion of  their  fellow-citizens  is  the  Banking  System  of  this  country — 
founded  on  an  assumption  of  power,  and  a  violation  of  constitutional 
rights,  these  considerations  are  alone  sufficient  grounds  for  its  con- 
demnation. But  to  it  we  may  also  impute  most  of  our  oppressions  and 
our  wrongs,  and  to  its  influence  the  most  blighting  effects  on  the 
prosperity  of  our  country  and  the  liberties  of  the  people. 

"  To  the  Banking  System,  and  that  alone,  can  be  imputed  the  pre- 
sent demoralizing  spirit  of  gambling  speculation,  by  which  vast 
fortunes  are  accumulated  in  a  short  time — extravagance,  idleness, 
dissipation  and  crime  thereby  encouraged. 

"It  is  the  machinery  by  which  the  industry  of  the  laboring  portions 
of  the  community  is  laid  under  contribution  to  an  amount  exceeding 
twenty  millions  annually,  without  an  equivalent,  or  any  benefit  to  our 
country.  It  is  the  plan  by  which  the  idle  few  live  by  the  labor  of 
the  many.  It  has  the  effect  to  fill  the  coffers  of  the  already  wealthy, 
while  it  takes  from  the  earnings  of  the  poor,  thereby  making  the  poor 
poorer,  and  the  rich  richer. 

"  It  is  that  which  has  raised  everything  to  a  fictitious  value,  there- 
by inviting  to  our  shores  the  products  and  manufactures  of  other 
countries,  to  the  manifest  injury  of  our  farmers,  manufacturers  and 
mechanics. 

"  Private  fortunes,  in  the  present  state  of  our  circulation,  are  at  the 
mercy  of  chartered  money  lenders,  and  are  prostrated  by  the  floods 
of  nominal  money,  with  which  their  avarice  deluges  us. 

",  Will  the  country  longer  submit  to  such  wrongs  and  oppression  ? 
We  trust  not.  We  therefore  invite  your  co-operation  in  correcting 
the  evil  in  the  most  safe  and  effectual  manner,  by  the  gradual  with- 
drawal of  Bank  paper  from  circulation.  We  would  also  recom- 
mend to  the  consideration  of  our  fellow-citizens  the  propriety  of  call- 
ing a  CONVENTION  to  revise  and  so  amend  the  Constitution  of  this 
State,  as  to  prohibit  future  legislatures  granting  acts  of  incorporation 
to  companies  or  individuals  in  any  case  whatever,  as  our  only  safe- 
guard against  temptation. 

"  The  restraining  law  so  called  is  intimately  connected  with  the 
subject  of  banks,  and  in  its  effects  renders  them  still  more  odious  as 
monopolies ;  it  ought  therefore  to  be  so  far  altered  or  repealed  as  to 
permit -offices  of  deposit  and  discount,  but  not  of  issue. 

"  There  has  been  less  improvement  in  the  proceedings  of  courts  of 
law  in  the  United  States  since  our  separation  from  Great  Britain  than 
in  either  of  the  other  branches  of  the  government — the  same  forms, 
the  same  unintelligible  and  unmeaning  jargon  and  special  pleadings 
which  were  imported  with  our  ancestors  still  prevail,  and  although 
we  have  a  republican  theory,  the  practices  of  our  courts  of  law  are 
as  aristocratic,  arbitrary  and  oppressive  as  they  were  in  the  dark 
ages  of  feudalism. 

"  It  is  now  become  manifest  from  experience,  that  in  proportion  as 
men  in  power  are  removed  from  responsibility  to  the  people,  they  be- 
come indifferent  to  their  rights,  or  to  the  dictates  of  justice.    The 
7 


74  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

decisions  in  some  of  our  courts  have  recently  demonstrated  not  only 
the  truth  of  this  remark,  but  the  necessity  of  a  constitutional  reform 
in  the  mode  of  appointing,  as  well  as  the  term  of  service  of  the 
judges  of  our  courts,  and  also  some  provision  against  the  use  of  de- 
cisions of  the  aristocratic  courts  of  Europe,  as  evidence  of  law  in  this 
country  where  the  principles  of  government  are  so  essentially  differ- 
ent. It  is  therefore  recommended  to  the  consideration  of  our  fellow- 
citizens  the  propriety  of  limiting  the  term  of  service  of  the  judges  of 
our  courts  of  law  to  THREE  YEARS,  and  that  they  be  in  future  elected 
by  the  people.  The  plan  of  electing  judges  ANNUALLY  by  the  gene- 
ral court  has  been  practised  by  the  people  in  the  State  of  Connecticut 
for  nearly  two  centuries  past,  and  with  no  evil  effects. 

"  The  construction  given  by  the  courts  of  law  in  this  State  to  the 
statute  on  '  Trade  and  Commerce,'  so  as  to  make  it  an  indictable 
offence  for  mechanics  to  combine  to  raise  their  wages,  or  fix  a  price 
on  their  labor,  is  manifestly  unjust,  oppressive,  and  a  violation  of  the 
first  law  of  nature — self-preservation.  An  amendment  or  alteration 
of  that  statute  ought  therefore  to  be  insisted  on. 

"  Fellow-Citizens — Too  long  have  we  been  estranged  from  each 
other  by  party  leaders  and  party  prejudices,  until  we  find  ourselves 
involved  in  a  labyrinth  of  difficulties,  dangers  and  oppressions. 
While  we  have  been  contending  about  names,  principles  have  been 
lost  sight  of.  And  while  we  have  been  amused  with  a  shadow,  the 
substance  has  been  surreptitiously  taken  from  us.  Let  us  now  profit 
by  past  errors — let  us  divest  ourselves  of  all  party  feelings,  party  pre- 
judices, and  attachments  to  party  leaders,  and  unite  to  support  and 
carry  out  correct  principles  and  correct  measures.  In  a  Republic 
but  few  laws  are  necessary,  and  those  few  plain,  simple,  and  easy  of 
comprehension. 

"  The  leaders  of  the  two  great  political  parties  under  which  the 
people  have  arrayed  themselves  are  selfish  and  unprincipled ;  the 
objects  of  both  are  power,  honors,  and  emolument ;  they  are  the  ene- 
mies of  the  equal  rights  of  the  citizen ;  be  therefore  no  longer  de- 
ceived ;  let  us  withdraw  ourselves  from  both,  and  unite  to  support 
those,  and  only  those,  who  will  pledge  themselves  to  oppose  all  mo- 
nopolies and  all  partial  and  unequal  legislation.  It  is  therefore 
recommended  to  the  friends  of  reform  in  the  different  districts  and 
counties  of  this  State  to  form  tickets  for  members  of  Congress  and  for 
the  State  Legislature,  composed  of  men  whose  principles  are  avowed 
and  known  to  be  in  accordance  with  our  own  views,  and  on  whose 
integrity  we  can  place  implicit  reliance,  and  unite  our  exertions  to 
effect  their  election ;  in  this  we  will  lay  the  foundation  of  legislative 
and  judicial  reforms.  Be  united,  be  firm,  let  our  watchword  be 
Equal  rights,  and  equal  laws,  and  .equal  justice,  and  success  will 
be  ours." 

The  delegates  from  the  city  of  New  York  returned  to 
their  constituents  and  reported  progress.  All  that  was 
done  at  Utica  by  the  convention  was  unanimously  ap- 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO   PARTY.  75 

proved  by  the  Equal  Rights  Democracy,  and  the  name 
of  Equal  Rights  Party  adopted  ;  as  were  also  the  nomi- 
nations of  the  gubernatorial  candidates.  A  committee  of 
correspondence  was  chosen,  and  the  following  answers 
were  received  : 

Isaac  S.  Smith's  Letter. 

BUFFALO,  September  29th,  1836. 

GENTLEMEN  : — Your  letter  of  the  26th  instant,  in  behalf  of  the  con- 
vention of  Mechanics,  Farmers,  and  Workingmen,  accompanied  by  a 
Declaration  of  rights  adopted  by  them  at  Utica,  and  presented  for  my 
consideration,  is  before  me.  * 

Fully  approving  the  resolution  which  requires  of  candidates  for  elec- 
tive offices,  avowals  of  their  political  principles,  I  cheerfully  state  the 
following  as  mine. 

The  first  great  political  truth  to  be  impressed  on  the  minds  of  our 
youth  is,  that  they  are  born  free,  and  that  no  acts  of  legislation  should 
deprive  them  of  perfect  equality  in  rights.  This  principle  will  con- 
stantly stimulate  those  of  humble  birth  to  compete  with  the  favorites 
t)f  fortune,  and  teach  them  that  without  personal  merit,  no  one  can 
have  just  claims  to  honorable  distinction. 

Although  the  first  declaration,  that  "  all  men  are  created  free  and 
equal,"  is  subscribed  to  by  a  vast  majority,  yet  our  legislatures  have 
not  framed  their  acts  in  conformity  to  it :  I  allude  to  their  acts  of 
incorporation,  generally  granted  to  active  and  intriguing  partisan?, 
who  make  a  trade  of  electioneering,  and  find  their  zeal  and  fidelity 
rewarded  by  valuable  monopolies  and  lucrative  offices. 

Our  legislatures  can  have  no  more  right  to  take  from  the  people 
and  confer  upon  individuals,  special  and  exclusive  privileges,  than 
they  have  to  confer  titles  of  nobility. 

Indirect  taxes  on  articles  of  necessity,  or  which  by  habit  have 
become  so,  as  well  as  all  demands  for  personal  services  without 
equivalents,  which  operate  oppressively  on  the  poor,  and  are  not 
felt  by  the  rich,  are  unjust,  and  should  not  exist. 

All  wealth  is  an  accumulation  of  surplus  labor,  from  which  alone 
the  expenses  and  burthens  of  government  should  be  borne.  No  per- 
son possessing  mental  or  physical  ability,  can  have  a  moral  right  to 
consume  that  which  he  does  not  in  some  manner  contribute  to  produce. 

None  of  our  institutions  have  so  strong  a  tendency  to  create  and 
perpetuate  the  odious  distinctions  betwixt  the  rich  and  the  poor,  as 
the  paper  money  banks.  Those  intorporations,  and  others  not  more 
meritorious,  and  yet  equally  monopolizing,  have  been  the  greatest 
cause  of  truckling  and  corruption  in  legislatures. 

The  worst  feature  in  the  proceedings  of  the  past  legislatures,  has 
been  the  wasteful  appropriation  of  large  sums,  ostensibly  for  public 
improvements,  but  in  reality  for  party  purposes ;  and  the  granting  of 
charters  for  banks,  with  which  to  strengthen  the  hands  of  parly 
leaders.  The  great  majority  of  the  people  have  but  little  interest 


76  HISTORY    OF   THE  [1836. 

individually  in  these  plunderings  of  the  many  for  the  benefit  of  the 
few. 

The  genius  of  our  institutions  requires  that  the  majority  shall 
govern,  therefore  no  legislature  can  in  all  cases  bind  their  successors. 

The  doctrine  of  vested  rights,  as  heretofore  promulgated,  is  dan- 
gerous, and  cannot  be  sustained. 

I  conceive  the  term,  paper  money,  an  absurdity ;  therefore,  I  would 
sanction  nothing  but  silver  and  gold  as  a  circulating  medium.  Bank- 
ers' notes  of  large  denominations,  and  bills  of  exchange,  which  must 
exist,  cannot  come  within  my  definition  of  circulating  medium.  My 
creed  is  to  leave  commercial  men  to  manage  their  own  affairs. 

As  the  difference  in  education  is  one  great  cause  of  the  distinctions 
in  society,  and  as  our  own  and  the  experience  of  other  countries  show 
that  a  well  educated  community  is  the  least  liable  to  anarchy  ;  that 
nothing  approaching  equality  can  exist  between  ignorance  and  intel- 
ligence, I  deem  it  essential  to  the  perpetuation  of  the  best  of  our  insti- 
tutions, and  to  promote  the  happiness  of  generations  to  come,  that  our 
common  schools  be  established  upon  a  basis  that  will  insure  to  every 
child  the  advantages  of  equal  education.  At  this  time,  it  is  not  pos- 
sible in  most  parts  of  our  country  to  obtain  any  more  than  the  rudi- 
ments of  the  plainest  education,  unless  the  children  be  sent  from 
home,  and  provided  for  at  a  great  expense  in  the  towns  ;  this  expense 
being  beyond  the  means  of  most  men,  their  children  neglected,  and 
being  comparatively  in  ignorance,  must  eventually  become  the  proper 
subjects  for  demagogues. 

Those  who  produce  all  the  wealth  should  not  submit  to  have  their 
families  kept  in  ignorance  and  degradation,  and  the  common  schools 
held  in  disrepute,  while  the  public  bounty  is  showered  upon  those  for 
the  education  of  the  aristocratical  few.  Too  much  cannot  be  done  for 
common  schools. 

As  a  citizen,  having  their  interests  warmly  at  heart,  I  approve  the 
Declaration  of  Rights  made  by  the  Mechanics,  Farmers  and  Working- 
men,  transmitted  by  you  to  me ;  and  as  they  have  thought  the  use  of 
my  name  would  benefit  the  cause,  I  do  not  feel  at  liberty  to  decline 
the  nomination  with  which  they  have  honored  me. 

I  am  very  respectfully  yours, 

ISAAC  S.  SMITH. 

To  Messrs.  E.  G.  Barney,  John  Cominerford,  Daniel  Gorham,  F. 
Byrdsall,  W.  F.  Piatt. 

M.  Jaques*  Letter. 

NEW  YORK,  September,  1836. 

GENTLEMEN  : — I  acknowledge  the  receipt  of  your  letter  in  behalf  of 
the  convention  x)f  Mechanics,  Farmers  and  Workingmen,  convened 
at  Utica  on  the  15th  instant,  addressed  to  me  in  reference  to  my  nomi- 
nation for  the  office  of  Lieutenant  Governor  of  this  state,  enclosing  a 
copy  of  the  Declaration  of  Rights  adopted  by  that  convention,  and 
requesting  my  approval  of  the  same. 

In  reply,  I  have  no  hesitation  in  avowing  my  entire  approbation  of 
all  the  articles  contained  in  the  Declaration  of  Rights  referred  to. 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  77 

Founded  on  the  law  of  nature,  and  of  nature's  God,  they  contain  the 
elements  of  all  rational  and  free  governments.  They  ought  to  be 
engraven  on  the  hearts  and  imprinted  on  the  minds  of  all  men,  and 
should  furnish  the  rule  of  all  their  social  Itnd  political  actions.  No 
effort  on  my  part  shall  be  wanting  to  carry  them  out  in  practice. 

Governments,  to  be  just,  should  carefully  guard  the  equal  rights  of 
every  citizen  in  his  person  and  property,  and  in  their  management. 
That  government  is  imperfect  while  the  most  inconsiderable  citizen 
suffers  a  wrong,  and  that  wrong  remains  unredressed. 

I  duly  appreciate  the  favorable  opinions  of  the  members  of  the  con- 
vention whose  partiality  conferred  on  me  the  nomination  for  the  high 
and  responsible  office  above  referred  to;  and  whether  the  people 
ratify  their  selection  or  not,  my  humble  efforts  shall  be  ever  devoted 
to  the  promotion  of  their  true  interests,  prosperity,  and  happiness. 

For  the  kind  manner  in  which  you  have  been  pleased  to  address 
me  on  this  -occasion,  I  tender  you  collectively  and  individually  the 
respect  and  esteem  of  your  friend  and  fellow-citizen. 

M.  JAQUES. 

The  foregoing  letters  were  submitted  to  the  general 
meeting  in  the  city  of  New  York,  and  adopted  with 
entire  unanimity  ;  consequently  Isaac  S.  Smith  and  Moses 
Jaques  were  the  candidates  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party, 
nominated  to  be  run  at  the  general  election  in  November, 
1836,  for  the  offices  of  governor  and  lieutenant  governor 
of  the  state  of  New  York. 


CHAPTER  VI. 

Preparations  for  November  election  of  1836 — Meeting  to  ballot  for 
Congress  ticket — Objections  made  to  Edward  Curtis  and  James 
Monroe — A.  F.  Vache  vouches  for  them — Balloting — MessrsJHas- 
brouck,  Curtis,  Monroe  and  Ferris  nominated — Sketch  of  Stephen 
Hasbrouck,  contrasted  with  N.  P.  Tallmadge — Success  of  Political 
apostacy — Sketch  of  Edward  Curtis — His  letter  to  Recording  Secre- 
tary produces  dissatisfaction — Sketch  of  A.  F.  Vache — His  motion 
respecting  the  letter  prevails  and  the  one  to  the  committee  of  cor- 
respondence is  taken  up,  and  E.  Curtis'  nomination  is  confirmed — 
Letters  from  Stephen  Hasbrouck,  James  Monroe,  and  candidates  for 
the  Assembly — Eli  Moore's  nomination — F.  A.  Tallmadge's  nomi- 
nation and  letter — Reflections. 

"  The  man  who  would  present  himself  to  the  suffrages  of  his  fellow-citizens,  and 
withhold  his  political  views  and  intentions,  is  both  a  knave  and  a  coward  : — a  knave, 
meditating  treachery  to  the  people,  and  a  coward,  afraid  to  avow  his  wickedness." 

CAMBRKLENG'S  SPKECH,  Oct.  5th,  1835. 

THE  month  of  October,  1836,  was  at  hand,  that  month, 
which  of  all  others  in  the  year,  sets  the  politicians  of  the 
state  of  New  York  in  motion  to  make  preparations  for 
the  annual  general  election.  The  Equal  Rights  De- 
mocracy of  the  city  of  New  York  with  that  cheerful,  un- 
subdued activity/  which  always  characterised  it,  was  the 
first  at  work.  By  its  constitution  of  organization,  each 
ward  had  to  make  a  full  ticket  of  nominations  for  the 
County,  and  these  were  to  be  submitted  to  a  general 
meeting  of  the  party,  to  make  selections  therefrom  by 
ballot.  These  ward  nominations  were  published  in  the 
Democrat  on  the  28th  of  September,  and  a  general  meet- 
ing called  for  the  3d  of  October. 

The  general  meeting  took  place  accordingly,  Alex- 
ander F.  Vache  in  the  chair.  Part  of  the  Assembly 
ticket  was  nominated,  and  Alexander  Ming,  Jr.,  as  the 
candidate  for  County  Register. 

On  the  6th  of  October,  pursuant  to  adjournment,  an- 
other general  meeting  was  held  to  complete  the  Assem- 
bly ticket,  and  to  ballot  for  the  Congressional  ticket,  John 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  79 

Commerford  in  the  ehair.  The  following  names  had 
been  published  as  candidates  for  nomination  on  the  Con- 
gress ticket : 

Stephen  Hasbrouck,  Edward  Curtis,  Charles  G.  Ferris, 
Eli  Moore,  C.  C.  Cambreleng,  Thomas  Herttell,  P.  E. 
Milledoler,  Alexander  Ming,  Jr.,  William  F.  Piatt,  B.  F. 
Hallock,  James  Monroe,  Clinton  Roosevelt,  Frederick  A. 
Tallmadge. 

Before  going  into  ballot  for  the  Congressional  ticket, 
doubts  were  expressed  in  relation  to  Edward  Curtis  and 
James  Monroe,  when  Alexander  F.  Vache,  a  man  in 
whom  the  party  had  the  fullest  confidence,  spoke  in  favor 
of  their  nomination,  urging  the  popularity  and  qualifica- 
tions of  both,  and  stating  that  Edward  Curtis  was  a 
member  of  the  party,  having  signed  the  Declaration  of 
Principles  in  his  presence,  taking  exception  only  to  the 
last  article.  That  he  was  well  acquainted  with  them 
both — that  he  had  frequent  conversations  with  them  re- 
specting the  Declaration  of  Principles — "  that  they  were 
as  radical  and  thorough  as  any  present,"  so  much  so,  that 
he  had  no  hesitation  to  vouch  for  them,  and  that  they 
would  strenuously  maintain  the  principles  of  the  party. 

The  meeting  then  proceeded  to  ballot,  and  on  counting 
the  votes  of  the  first  balloting,  Stephen  Hasbrouck,  Ed- 
ward Curtis,  Charles  G.  Ferris  and  James  Monroe  ob- 
tained the  majority.  Hasbrouck  the  highest — Curtis 
three  votes, — Ferris  four,  and  Monroe  eight  votes  less 
than  the  highest. 

Messrs.  Vache,  Byrdsall,  Jones,  Wilson  and  Watkins, 
were  chosen  a  committee  to  correspond  with  the  candi- 
dates. 

Stephen  Hasbrouck  is  a  respectable  physician  in  the 
city  of  New  York ;  he  had  from  the  first  been  with  the 
anti-monopoly  Democracy  in  principle.  His  ancestry 
was  revolutionary  and  Democratic  Republican.  From 
his  earliest  youth  up,  a  sincere  Democrat  by  nature,  the 
doctrines  of  Christianity,  (he  is  a  member  of  a  Christian 
church)  induced  a  deeper  devotion  to  those  political 


80  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

principles,  which  are  best  expressed  by  the  phrase — 
Christian  Democracy.  While  a  young  man,  he  was  a 
student  in  the  same  college  with  the  celebrated  N.  P. 
Tallmadge,  with  whom  he  had,  at  that  early  period  of  his 
life,  frequent  political  controversies :  they  were  then  at- 
tached, each  to  one  of  the  two  opposite  parties.  What 
strange  commentaries  upon  the  principles  of  men  are  the 
political  incidents  of  their  lives !  Tallmadge  left  the 
Federalist  party  and  joined  the  Democratic ;  conse- 
quently the  new  proselyte  was  a  more  purified  Democrat, 
and  therefore  worthy  of  all  the  profits  and  honors  which 
were  showered  upon  him  in  profusion.  The  political 
convert  was  at  length  raised  to  the  dignity  of  Senator  of 
the  United  States,  but  a  re-conversion  brought  him  to  the 
Federal  Whigs,  and  they  could  do  no  less  than  keep  him 
in  the  Senate.  They  would  have  done  more,  they  would 
have  made  him  Vice  President  of  the  United  States,  but 
that  policy  prevailed  over  affection,  and  this  induced  the 
nomination  of"  honest  John  Tyler."  Stephen  Hasbrouck, 
true  to  the  democracy  all  his  life,  has  made  no  personal 
progress  whatever.  With  much  talent,  excellent  politi- 
cal qualifications,  and  unblemished  moral  character,  he 
has  never  received  honor  or  profit  from  the  Democratic 
Republican  party,  however  much  he  might  have  wished 
for  the  one,  or  may  have  needed  the  other.  But  so  it  is 
in  politics.  Parties  act  towards  apostates  coming  to  their 
ranks,  as  if  there  was  heroism  in  daring  to  do  the  deed  of 
shameless  desertion,  and  the  deserting  hero  must  be 
placed  in  a  leading,  or  profitable  position.  There  are 
numerous  instances  to  prove  that  the  shortest  avenue  to 
political  preferment  is  the  zig  zag  one  which  leads  from 
party  to  party,  and  the  surest  qualifications  for  political 
honors,  are  political  apostacy  and  dishonesty.  At  least 
those  who  manage  the  machinery  of  party  will  have  it 
so,  as  long  as  the  majority  of  the  people  fondle  the  theory 
of  self-government  at  home,  and  go  to  sleep  as  regards 
the  practice  of  it. 

Edward  Curtis  is  a  member  of  the  legal  profession, 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  81 

possessing  considerable  natural  endowments,  not  only  of 
political,  but  also  of  business  ability.  He  has  those  gen- 
tlemanly manners  which  are  usually  united  with  benevo- 
lence, but  his  good  qualities  are  governed  by  an  aspiring 
desire  for  distinction,  too  apt  to  overlook  the  best  means 
of  attaining  it.  While  other  politicians  abandoned  one 
party  to  join  another,  Mr.  Curtis,  either  by  superior  tact 
or  good  fortune,  became  the  candidate  of  three  political 
parties,  for  he  was  nominated  and  supported  by  the  Loco- 
Focos,  the  Whigs,  and  the  Native  American  party.  It 
is  best  known  to  the  latter  party,  what  he  may  have 
written  or  said  in  favor  of  their  one  little  idea  to  obtain 
their  suffrage ;  but  he  had  the  reputation  among  the 
Loco-Focos  of  having  written  a  series  of  anti-Bank  es- 
says, which  were  much  applauded  for  the  felicitous  man- 
ner and  ability  which  they  displayed.  He  was  considered 
an  acquisition  to  the  Equal  Rights  party,  and  he  appeared 
to  take  a  lively  interest  in  the  cause. 

After  he  had  signed  the  Declaration  of  principles,  he 
placed  in  the  hands  of  the  Recording  Secretary  a  written 
paper,  which  he  stated  contained  his  views  in  relation  to 
the  Declaration.  At  the  same  time,  he  desired  that  it 
should  be  read  in  open  meeting,  if  his  name  ever  came 
up  as  a  candidate  for  any  office  to  be  supported  by  the 
party. 

NEW  YOBK,  Sept.  1836. 
Mr.  F.  Byrdsall,  Rec.  Secretary  : 

The  first  three  Sections  of  the  Declaration  of  principles,  contain 
fundamental  principle!  of  government,  and  private  rights  to  which  I 
think  no  republican  ever  has  objected.  They  are  familiar  and  uni- 
versally accepted  principles,  recognized  in  the  formation  of  our  Gen- 
eral and  State  Governments,  and  professedly  adopted  by  all  parties 
in  this  country.  With  regard  to  the  remaining  Sections  of  the  Dec- 
laration, the  sense  in  which  I  subscribe  to  them,  and  the  extent  to 
which  I  adopt  them  is  as  follows.  In  regard  to  Banking,  it  seems  to 
me  the  duty  of  our  Legislators,  by  all  lawful  measures  to  protect  the 
people  against  the  evils  of  an  expanded  paper  currency.  That  the 
business  wants  of  our  State,  instead  of  any  increase  of  Banks,  de- 
mand the  best  wisdom  of  our  Legislatures,  both  State  and  National, 
to  ensure  us  that  in  all  the  vicissitudes  incident  to  the  Commerce  of 
the  country,  the  Banks  already  in  existence  shall  be  rendered  able 


82  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

and  willing  to  redeem  their  notes  in  specie.  It  is  my  opinion  that  the 
right  of  the  people  to  compete  with  the  incorporated  Banks  in  dealing 
in  money  and  in  credit  as  currency;  ought  to  be  restored  to  them  by 
law.  The  repeal  of  existing  restraints  in  this  respect,  is  a  measure 
which  the  advocates  of  equal  rights  may  well  insist  upon.  If  such 
repeal  shall  have  the  effect  to  establish  among  us  houses  for  the  ne- 
gotiation of  notes  and  other  bills,  all  those  who  may  have  need  of 
such  facilities  in  business,  would  not  be  dependent,  as  now,  upon  the 
favor  of  the  incorporated  banks.  Such  a  result  would  promote  a 
freedom  of  opinion  concerning  the  existing  banking  system,  conduc- 
ing to  salutary  reform  and  tending  to  the  public  good.  There  would 
probably  be  less  objection  than  is  now  made  to  restraining  the  issue 
of  small  notes  by  the  banks.  The  inconveniencies  of  that  reform 
would  be  less  talked  of.  The  basis  of  the  bank  issues,  strengthened, 
as  I  think  it  is  already,  by  the  exclusion  of  small  notes  in  this  and 
some  of  the  states,  may  yet  be  rendered  broader  and  deeper  by 
pushing  that  wholesome  experiment  with  proper  caution  still  further. 
The  bank  interest  will  cry  out  against  it,  for  it  will  curtail  their  cir- 
culation of  notes  and  reduce  their  gains.  It  would  be  said  that, 
though  salutary  in  its  object,  the  measure  will  avail  nothing,  because 
the  notes  of  the  banks  of  other  states  will  supply  the  places  of  the 
notes  of  our  own  banks  thus  restrained  by  law.  I  answer,  such  may 
be  the  temporary  effect,  but  whatsoever  measure  is  just  in  itself  and 
found  useful  in  its  results,  as  tending  to  perfect  the  safety  of  the  pa- 
per currency,  if  adopted  in  this,  will  not  be  long  delayed  in  the  neigh- 
boring states.  When  it  is  considered  how  numberless  are  the  banks 
already  established  throughout  all  the  states ;  that  they  are  now  wholly 
independent  of  any  power  that  can  exercise  a  general  control  over 
their  issues ;  that  their  reciprocal  influences,  acting  upon  each  other, 
tend  to  increase  the  aggregate  issues  of  paper,  the  expansion  of  one 
bank  enabling  its  neighboring  bank  to  yield  to  the  always  pressing 
tendencies  to  follow  the  example,  and  the  like  effect  perpetually  run- 
ning through  the  whole  circle  of  banks ;  and  especially  when  it  be 
remembered,  also,  that  so  long  as  it  be  lawful  to  issue  notes  of  the 
smallest  denominations,  they  will  drive  out  the  gold  and  silver,  and 
thus  paper  will  form  the  entire  circulating  medium ;  I  am  not  sur- 
prised that  a  reformation  of  the  banking  system  is  becoming  a  promi- 
nent point  among  the  lessons  of  the  political  reform  of  the  day. 

Upon  the  subject  of  monopolies  by  legislation,  my  doctrine  is,  that 
if  there  be  any  kind  of  business  which  for  the  safety  of  the  people 
need  legal  restraint  or  legislation,  let  the  laws  be  general  in  their 
application,  so  that  all  who  conform  to  their  requisition,  may  enjoy 
their  protection  and  their  benefits.  Then  the  power  of  legislation  at 
Albany  will  cease  to  be  an  oppressive  monopoly  in  the  hands  of  the 
dominant  party.  Rights  and  privileges,  the  rightful  inheritance  of 
the  whole  people,  will  be  no  longer  doled  out  in  the  form  of  corpo- 
rate acts,  for  the  wages  of  partizan  servitude.  The  discriminating 
tax  now  levied  upon  political  independence  will  be  thereby  repealed, 
and  the  struggle  which  freedom  of  opinion  is  now  doomed  to  maintain 


1836.]  LOCOFOCO   PARTY.  83 

against  the  established  legislative  bounties  to  partisan  subserviency, 
will  be  at  an  end. 

The  sixth  section  of  the  Declaration  of  Principles  has  this  clause : 
"  Hostility  to  the  dangerous  and  unconstitutional  creation  of  vested 
rights,"  and  then  proceeds  to  assert  the  power  of  one  legislature  to 
repeal  any  law  passed  by  a  former  legislature.  I  take  it  this  clause 
does  not  intend  to  deny  the  power  of  legislatures  to  create  vested 
rights  by  constitutional  laws  ;  and  I  certainly  do  not  agree  that  all 
laws  passed  by  one  legislature,  may  be  rightfully  repealed  by  a  suc- 
ceeding or  subsequent  legislature.  There  is  a  large  class  of  laws 
under  which  private  rights  are  vested,  and  whereby  the  state  becomes 
a  party  to  lawful  grants  and  contracts,  for  the  maintenance  of  which 
the  good  faith  of  the  State  is  pledged.  The  Constitution  of  the  United 
States  prohibits  the  States  from  passing  laws  impairing  the  obligation 
of  contracts,  and  to  repeal  or  disturb  grants  or  contracts  constitution- 
ally made  by  the  State,  would  be  a  violation  of  that  provision  and 
bring  dishonor  upon  the  people.  I  have  thus,  at  length,  declared  my 
understanding  of  the  Declaration  of  Principles  of  the  "  Antimonpoly 
Party,"  and  the  extent  to  which  I  have  subscribed  to  them,  because  I 
deem  it  very  important  that  dealing  with  those  who  profess  to  be  de- 
sirous to  "  effect  constitutional  reform  in  legislation,  and  to  bring 
back  into  practice  the  principles  upon  which  the  government  of  these 
States  was  originally  founded."  I  should  not  even  seem  to  take  any 
ground  which  may  not  be  clearly  maintained. 

EDWARD  CURTIS. 

Of  Charles  G.  Ferris,  the  third  candidate  nominated  by 
the  Equal  Rights  Party,  we  have  already  given  a  brief 
sketch.  We  have  only  to  add  in  this  place^  that  he  de- 
clined the  nomination  and  Eli  Moore  was  subsequently 
nominated  to  supply  his  place  on  the  ticket.  Mr.  Moore 
signed  the  Declaration  of  Rights,  and  had  the  honor  of 
receiving  the  nomination  of  the  Equal  Rights  and  Tam- 
many Parties  on  the  same  evening. 

James  Monroe,  the  fourth  candidate  of  the  Equal  Rights 
Party  for  Congress,  never  became  a  member  of  the  Party, 
for  he  never  signed  the  Declaration.  But  the  letter  he 
wrote  to  the  committee  of  correspondence  was  deemed 
so  satisfactory  that  his  nomination  was  confirmed. 

A  general  county  meeting  was  held  on  the  19th  of  Oc- 
tober, and  the  committee  which  had  been  chosen  to  cor- 
respond with  the  candidates  for  Congress  and  the  State 
Legislature,  were  called  on  to  report.  The  Recording- 
Secretary  presented  and  read  the  written  paper  addressed 


84  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

to  him  by  Mr.  Curtis,  already  given.  .The  contents  of 
the  letter  in  relation  to  the  fourth  and  last  articles  were 
unsatisfactory  ;  a  second  reading  of  it  was  called  for, 
after  which  an  excited  debate  ensued.  In  the  midst  of  it 
Alex.  F.  Vache  interposed  and  addressed  the  meeting. 

Doctor  A.  F.  Vachc,  the  most  ingenious  casuist  of  the 
Loco-Foco  Party,  had,  under  the  tuition  of  the  celebrated 
Doctor  Sam'l  L.  Mitchell,  become  a  proficient,  to  a  de- 
gree of  fastidiousness  in  the  selection  of  words  and  nice- 
ties of  style,  for  which  his  casuistic  turn  of  mind  natural- 
ly disposed  him.  He  spoke  to  the  meeting  in  that  earnest 
but  assuasive  tone  of  voice  for  which  he  is  distinguished 
as  a  reasoner,  arguing  that  the  Equal  Rights  Party  had 
nothing  to  do  with  the  letter  addressed  by  Mr.  Curtis  to 
Mr.  Byrdsall,  because  it  was  a  private  communication 
and  not  a  public  document.  He  urged  that  Mr.  Curtis 
or  any  body  else  had  a  perfect  right  to  address  a  commu- 
nication to  the  Recording  Secretary  upon  the  Declaration 
of  Principles,  containing  the  views  of  the  writer ;  but  the 
Equal  Rights  Party  had  nothing  to  do  with  this,  as  a  political 
party,  and  it  was  not  necessary,  because  that  a  committee 
had  been  already  appointed  to  correspond  with  the  can- 
didates, and  he  as  chairman  of  that  committee,  had  re- 
ceived a  letter  from  Mr.  Curtis  to  be  read  to  the  meeting. 
He  therefore  moved  that  the  letter  addressed  to  Mr.  Byrd- 
sall be  laid  on  the  table  as  a  private  document,  so  that 
the  letter  to  the  committee  of  correspondence  might  be 
taken  up  for  consideration.  This  motion  prevailed  and 
the  following  correspondence  was  submitter! : 

NEW  YORK,  October,  1836. 
To  Messrs.  Stephen  Hasbrouck,  Charles  G.  Ferris,  Edward  Curtis, 

and  James  Monroe. 

GENTLEMEN — We  are  instructed  by  the  Democratic  Party  friendly 
to  Equal  Rights  and  opposed  to  all  Monopolies,  to  inform  you  of 
your  nomination  as  members  of  Congress,  and  to  submit  for  your  ap- 
proval the  "  Declaration  of  Rights,"  adopted  by  the  State  Convention 
atUtica,  September  15th,  1836.— 

[See  Declaration  of  Rights.] 

We  are  also  instructed  to  request  your  answer  to  the  following 
questions ; 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  85 

1st.  Will  you  advocate  such  amendment  of  the  Constitution  as  will 
admit  the  right  of  the  people  to  vote  directly  in  the  election  of  Presi- 
dent and  Vice  President  of  the  United  States  ?  Also,  the  ineligibility 
of  those  officers  to  a  re-election  ? 

2d.  Are  you  in  favor  of  a  strict  construction  of  the  Constitution  of 
the  United  States  ? 

3d.  Will  you  advocate  the  repeal  of  duties  on  the  prime  necessaries 
of  life,  and  especially  the  duty  on  foreign  coal  ? 

Your  assent  to  the  "  Declaration  of  Rights,"  and  the  questions 
above  stated,  is  necessarily  and  respectfully  requested  in  order  to  be 
laid  before  the  county  meeting. 

With  the  highest  respect,  &c. 

ALEX.  F.  VACHE,       F.'BYRDSALL, 
R.  R.  JONES,  JOHN  WATKINS, 

A.  D.  WILSON. 

NEW  YORK,  October  19,1836. 

GENTLEMEN  : — I  have  the  honor  to  acknowledge  the  receipt  of 
your  letter,  informing  me  that  I  have  been  nominated  as  one  of  the 
candidates  for  Congress,  by  the  "  Democratic  Party  friendly  to  Equal 
Rights  and  opposed  to  all  Monopolies."  Your  letter  also  contains  cer- 
tain articles,  setting  forth  the  political  faith  of  the  Party,  and  presents 
several  questions  touching  the  expediency  of  certain  measures.  Hav- 
ing on  a  former  occasion  testified  my  assent  to  the  Declaration  of 
Principles,  and  made  known  my  sentiments,  I  will  proceed  at  once  to 
state  my  opinions  on  the  subjects  to  which  the  questions  relate.  I  am 
in  favor  of  such  an  amendment  of  the  Constitution  of  the  U.  States  as 
will  secure  to  the  people  the  right  of  voting  directly  for  President  and 
Vice  President.  It  would,  in  my  opinion,  be  a  discreet  measure  to 
limit  the  term  of  service  in  the  offices  of  President  and  Vice  Presi- 
dent to  one  term.  Such  an  alteration  would  probably  give  us  more 
security  against  the  evil  consequences  of  official  intrigue  and  corrup- 
tion. It  is,  in  my  opinion,  the  safest  rule  to  adhere  to  a  strict  construc- 
tion of  the  Constitution.  I  readily  yield  my  assent  to  the  proposition, 
that  no  duties  ought  to  be  imposed  upon  such  important  articles  of  com- 
merce as  are  usually  classed  among  the  necessaries  of  life ;  and  with 
respect  to  foreign  coals,  it  seems  to  me  that  not  only  policy,  but  com- 
mon philanthropy,  demands  that  coals  should  be  admitted  into  our 
ports  free  of  duty.  My  humble  services  shall  never  be  wanting  to 
such  a  modification  of  the  Tariff  as  shall  exempt  us  from  the  enor- 
mous tax  unnecessarily  and  unjustly  imposed  upon  us,  in  the  exorbitant 
prices  at  which  our  fuel,  for  domestic  and  manufacturing  purposes, 
is  now  purchased.  Having  noticed  all  the  interrogatories  submitted, 
I  declare  my  acceptance  of  the  nomination.  Should  I  be  elected,  I 
shall  with  such  ability  as  I  possess,  maintain  the  Equal  Rights  of  the 
people,  and  act  for  the  best  good  of  our  common  country. 

With  great  regard,  gentlemen,  for  each  of  you,  personally,  I  am 
yours,  EDWARD  CURTIS. 

To  Messrs.  Alex.  F.  Vache,  F.  Byrdsall,  R.  R.  Jones,  John  Wat- 
kins,  and  A.J).  Wilson,  Esqr's.  Committee,  &c. 
8 


86  HISTORY   OF   THE  [1836. 

This  letter  to  the  Committee  was  discussed  and  finally 
decided  upon  as  satisfactory,  by  the  majority.  Mr.  Cur- 
tis' nomination  was  then  confirmed.  The  letters  of  the 
other  candidates  were  also  submitted.  They  are  inserted 
for  the  perusal  of  the  reader. 

NEW  YORK,  October  14th,  1836. 

GENTLEMEN  : — Your  letter  communicating  to  me  my  nomination  as 
a  candidate  for  Congress,  by  the  Democratic  Party  of  this  city,  friend- 
ly to  Equal  Rights  and  opposed  to  all  monopolies,  has  been  duly  re- 
ceived. 

In  it,  you  have,»as  instructed,  submitted  for  my  approval  the  Dec- 
laration of  Rights  adopted  by  the  Convention  at  Utica,  on  the  15th 
Sept.  1836 — being  almost  a  transcript  of  the  Declaration  of  Principles 
of  that  portion  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party,  which  has  for  some  time 
past  associated  in  this  city,  it  has  my  most  cordial  approbation. 

The  first  three  articles  contain  a  summary  of  the  Principles  which 
form  the  basis  of  all  correct  government,  principles  derived  from  the 
laws  of  natural  religion,  the  sovereignty  of  Deity,  and  the  relations 
men  sustain  to  their  Creator  and  each  other,  and  which  are  fully  re- 
cognized and  confirmed  by  Revelation. 

The  5th,  6th  and  7th  articles  are  merely  the  extension  of  those  Prin- 
ciples, by  declaring  an  opposition  to  certain  violations,  or  abuses  of 
them,  which  have  too  often  occurred  in  the  exercise  of  government, 
and  which  have  been  the  source  of  much  evil  in  communities. 

The  fourth  article  contains  explicit  provisions  of  our  national  com- 
pact concerning  currency. 

The  last  article  only  declares  the  powers  necessarily  incident  to 
every  community  the  right  of  self-government,  and  of  the  majority  to 
rule. 

In  reply  to  your  first  question,  I  answer  that  I  consider  such  an 
amendment  of  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States  as  shall  give  to 
the  people  the  direct  choice  of  president  and  vice-president,  and  the 
limitation  of  their  service  to  one  term,  required  by  the  best  interests 
of  the  country,  as  the  great  security  against  official  intrigue  and  cor- 
ruption, and  I  shall  always  be  ready  to  advocate  it. 

To  your  second  question,  I  reply  that  I  consider  a  strict  construc- 
tion of  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States,  necessary  to  preserve 
the  harmony  of  the  Union,  and  the  perpetuity  of  our  government,  that 
we  should  always  bear  in  mind  that  our  general  government  is  one  of 
expressly  delegated  powers,  and  that  to  "  the  states  or  the  people" 
belong  all  other  powers,  which  they  have  not  "  prohibited"  to  them- 
selves by  the  national  compact. 

To  the  third  question  I  reply,  that  I  shall  ever  be  ready  to  advo- 
cate a  repeal  of  duties  on  such  articles  as  are  referred  to,  especially 
that  on  foreign  coals,  as  a  measure  both  of  philanthropy  and  of  sound 
national  policy. 

To  my  fellow-citizens  whom,  as  a  committee  you  represent,  I  ac- 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  87 

knowledge  the  grateful  sense  I  entertain  of  the  honor  conferred  on 
me,  in  selecting  me  as  a  candidate  for  member  of  Congress.  Unam- 
bitious of  public  office,  and  preferring  the  pursuits  of  private  life,  I 
should  have  declined  the  nomination,  but  believing  that  when,  as  at 
present,  great  and  important  principles  are  at  stake,  no  one  should 
decline  the  call  of  his  fellow-citizens,  unless  for  the  most  weighty 
considerations.  I  accept  the  nomination  you  have  tendered  me,  and 
if  elected  will,  according  to  my  ability,  sustain  the  great  principles 
you  advocate,  with  a  conscientious  regard  to  the  interests  of  our  com- 
mon country. 

With  highest,  &c., 

STEPHEN  HASBROUCK. 


NEW  YORK,  October  18th,  1836. 

GENTLEMEN  : — On  the  13th,  I  received  your  letter  informing  me  that 
I  had  been  honored  with  a  nomination  for  Congress,  by  the  "  Demo- 
cratic Party  opposed  to  all  monopolies,  and  in  favor  of  Equal  Rights.'* 
If  I  have  a  right  understanding  of  the  principles  of  your  party,  your 
candidates  are  committed  to  maintain  the  Equal  Rights  of  the  people, 
to  oppose  all  monopolies  by  legislation,  and  to  exempt  from  taxation 
the  necessaries  of  life ;  that  you  are  in  favor  of  a  repeal  of  the  re- 
straining law,  which  restores  to  the  people  the  exclusive  privilege  now 
exercised  by  the  banks,  of  dealing  in  money ;  that  so  far  from  hold- 
ing, as  has  been  represented,  a  disposition  to  invade  the  rights  or 
property  of  citizens,  by  the  repeal  of  constitutional  laws,  you  hold  to  a 
strict  construction  of  the  constitution  of  the  United  States,  and  insist 
upon  the  full  benefit  of  the  guarantee,  for  all  the  rights  established  by 
the  fundamental  law  of  the  land.  With  these  views  of  your  doctrines, 
I  have  resolved  to  accept  the  nomination.  Under  existing  circum~ 
stances,  I  presume  I  shall,  at  least  on  this  occasion,  escape  all  im- 
plication of  ambitious  motives.  My  sole  purpose  is  to  meet  the 
wishes  of  a  party  which  I  believe  to  be  honest,  and  which,  though 
strong  in  principles,  is  numerically  feeble,  in  comparison  with  the 
contending  parties  of  the  day.  I  enter  the  field  without  the  least 
expectation  of  meeting  that  success  which  such  a  cause  merits,  and 
with  no  other  object  than  the  maintenance  of  those  principles,  hoping 
that  as  they  become  known  to  the  American  people,  they  will  re- 
ceive their  approbation,  and  repel  the  slanders  with  which  you  have 
been  assailed  by  the  ignorant,  and  the  selfish,  and  the  interested.  In 
conclusion,  it  is  due  to  myself  and  friends  to  state,  that  though  this  is 
the  fourth  time  that  my  name  has  been  put  in  nomination  in  general 
election,  that  I  have  never  sought,  but  on  the  contrary,  have  at  all 
times,  as  known  to  my  friends,  endeavored  to  avoid  it.  Yet  circum- 
stances which  I  have  not  considered  myself  at  liberty  to  control,  have 
obliged  me  to  yield  to  the  wishes  of  my  fellow- citizens.  I  have  ever 
been  taught  not  to  stop  to  count  numbers,  when  fighting  for  principle. 
Accept,  gentlemen,  &c.,  &c., 

JAMES  MONROE! 


88  HISTORY    OF    THE  [1836. 

NEW  YORK,  October,  1836. 
To  Messrs.  Clinton  Roosevelt,  Job  Haskell,  Alexander  Gray,  William 

F.  Piatt,  John  Windt,  Robert  Toicnsend,  jr.,  Edward  J.  Webb,  John 

Wilder,  Hiram  Tupper,  Levi  D.  Slamm,  George  W.  Matsell,  Ed- 
ward G.  Barney,  and  George  Dixey : — 

Gentlemen — It  becomes  our  duty  to  convey  to  you,  in  behalf  of  the 
Democratic  Party  friendly  to  Equal  Rights  and  opposed  to  all  Mono- 
polies, your  nomination  for  members  of  Assembly  for  the  county  of 
New  York,  and  to  submit  to  you  the  "  Declaration  of  Rights  "  adopted 
by  the  State  convention  at  Utica,  September  15th,  1836^ 

We  are  also  instructed  to  request  your  answers  to  the  following 
questions : — 

1st.  Will  you  advocate  the  repeal  of  the  Restraining  Law,  so  far 
as  to  permit  offices  of  discount  and  deposit  ? 

2d.  And  the  exclusion  from  circulation  as  currency  of  all  bank 
notes  of  ten  dollars  and  under  that  amount  ? 

3d.  And  the  election  of  Judges  by  the  people,  and  for  a  limited  term 
of  office  ? 

4th.  And  the  repeal  of  laws,  or  parts  of  laws,  prohibiting,  or  ad- 
Terse  to  working  people  individually  or  collectively  fixing  the  wages 
of  their  own  labor  ? 

5th.  And  a  more  extended,  equal  and  convenient  system  of  public 
school  instruction? 

6th.  Non-imprisonment  for  debt  ? 

7th.  And  the  lien  law  so  amended  as  really  to  afford  a  lien  of  secu- 
rity, plain  and  useful  to  working  men  ? 

Your  assent  to  the  "  Declaration  of  Rights,"  and  the  questions 
above  stated,  is  necessarily  requested,  in  order  to  be  laid  before  the 
county  meeting. 

Very  respectfully,  &c., 

ALEX.  F.  VACHE,         R.  R.  JONES, 
F.  BYRDSALL,  JOHN  WATKINS,^ 

A.  W.  WILSON. 

NEW  YORK,  October  17th,  1836. 

Gentlemen — We  have  received  your  notification,  in  behalf  of  the 
Democratic  Party  in  favor  of  Equal  Rights,  of  our  nomination  for 
members  of  Assembly  for  the  county  of  New  York,  and  acknowledge 
the  honor  conferred  on  us  in  being  selected  as  candidates  to  represent 
in  the  State  Legislature  a  party  founded  on  the  purest  and  most  en- 
larged principles  of  justice. 

You  do  us  the  honor  also  to  submit  to  us  the  Declaration  of  Rights 
adopted  by  the  State  Convention  at  Utica,  on  the  15th  of  September, 
1836; — and  to  these  and  several  succeeding  questions  you  request  a 
reply. 

The  first  article  of  the  Declaration  to  which  our  assent  is  asked,  is 
the  first  paragraph  of  the  Declaration  of  Independence,  adopted  by 
the  sages  and  patriots  of  the  Revolution,  and  claims  our  unanimous 
support. 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  89 

With  regard  to  the  principles  contained  in  the  six  succeeding  arti- 
cles in  the  Bill  of  Rights,  we  also  unhesitatingly  declare  our  cheerful 
acquiescence. 

In  reference  to  the  eighth  and  last  articles,  we  beg  leave  to  say, 
that  while  we  also  concur  therein,  we"wlsh,  for  the  sake  of  more  fully 
enlightening  the  public  mind  in  relation  to  our  views,  to  give  the  fol- 
lowing explanation. 

It  declares  that  "  each  and  every  law  or  act  of  incorporation  passed 
by  preceding  legislatures,  can  be  rightfully  altered  or  repealed  by 
their  successors,  and  that  they  should  be  so  altered  or  repealed  when 
necessary  for  the  public  good,  or  when  required  by  a  majority  of  the 
people." 

We  take  it  for  granted  that  there  is  nothing  contained  or  intended 
so  to  be,  in  this  article,  calculated  either  directly  or  indirectly  to  im- 
pair the  constitutional  rights  of  any  citizen  or  citizens. 

In' answer  to  the  seven  questions  which  follow  the  Declaration  of 
Rights,  we  remark :  In  order  to  be  brief  and  explicit,  we  readily  give 
our  answer  to  all  and  each  of  them  in  the  affirmative.  But  the  re- 
quisition in  relation  to  a  more  extended,  equal  and  convenient  system 
of  public  education,  claims  particular  notice  and  support,  as  igno- 
rance and  vice  go  hand  in  hand ;  and  in  a  Republican  government 
the  worst  evil  is  ignorance. 

Very  respectfully, 

CLINTON  ROOSEVELT,  ROBERT  TOWNSEND,  Jr. 

WILLIAM  F.  PIATT,  ALEXANDER  GRAY, 

GEORGE  W.  MATSELL,  JOHN  WINDT, 

GEORGE  DIXEY,  HIRAM  TTIPPER, 

JOB  HASKELL,  EDWARD  G.  BARNEY, 

EDWARD  J.  WEBB,  CHARLES  HUNTER. 

JOHN  WILDER, 

The  General  Meeting  approved  the  preceding  corres- 
pondence, and  by  decided  majorities  confirmed  the  nomi- 
nations when  separately  put  to  vote.  Thus,  by  balloting 
in  the  several  Wards,  by  balloting  in  the  General  County 
meeting,  and  finally  by  the  viva  voce  decision  of  another 
general  meeting,  Stephen  Hasbrouck,  Edward  Curtis  and 
James  Monroe  were  adopted  as  candidates  for  Congress; 
and  Clinton  Roosevelt,  Robert  Townsend,  jr.,  Alexander 
Gray,  Edward  J.  Webb,  Hiram  Tupper,  George  W.  Mat- 
sell,  Job  Haskell,  John  Windt,  William  F.  Piatt,  John 
Wilder,  Charles  Hunter,  Edward  G.  Barney,  George 
Dixey,  as  candidates  for  the  House  of  Assembly  of  the 
State  Legislature. 

The  resignation  of  Mr.  Ferris  was  accepted,  and  at  an 
8* 


90  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

adjourned  meeting  held  on  the  21st  October,  Mr.  Eli 
Moore  was  nominated.  He  signed  the  Declaration  of 
Principles,  arid  subsequently  his  assent  to  the  other  ques- 
tions of  the  letter  of  the  Committee.  This  completed  the 
Congressional  ticket. 

Mr.  F.  A.  Tallmadge,  nominated  for  the  State  Senate, 
was  run  in  opposition  to  Morgan  L.  Smith  the  Tammany 
candidate.  As  a  private  citizen,  Mr.  M.  L.  Smith  was 
highly  esteemed  by  many  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party,  but 
his  political  associations  being  of  that  peculiar  demo- 
cracy of  which  Mr.  Gideon  Lee  was  a  leader,  the  poli- 
tical animosity  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party  towards  Mr. 
Lee,  and  the  "  oldest  and  wisest"  of  Tammany,  extended 
itself  towards  Mr.  Smith.  The  nomination  of  Gideon 
Lee  in  1835  for  Congress  had  produced  the  nomination  of 
Charles  G.  Ferris  with  the  view  of  defeating  his  election. 
Mr.  Lee  was,  however,  elected  in  1335,  and  as  if  to  pro- 
voke the  Equal  Rights  Democracy  still  further,  he  was 
again  nominated  in  1836.  To  defeat  him  was  in  both  cases 
equally  an  object  of  principle,  but  it  now  also  became  an 
object  of  feeling.  The  decided  indications  of  his  being 
again  a  candidate  did  much  to  lessen  opposition  to  the 
nomination  of  Mr.  Curtis  as  a  Loco-Foco  candidate.  The 
honest  and  generous-minded  are  not  naturally  suspicious, 
and  the  bearing  of  Mr.  Curtis  towards  every  member  of 
the  Equal  Rights  Party  with  whom  he  conversed,  toge- 
ther with  his  speech  on  the  4th  of  November,  was  such 
as  to  inspire  confidence.  The  party  did  confide  in  him, 
and  supported  him  by  its  full  vote,  in  the  election. 

F.  A.  Tallmadge  signed  the  original  Declaration  of 
Principles  "  with  the  qualification  of  the  last  article  in  the 
Delaration  of  Rights,"  namely,  "  when  necessary  for  the 
public  good  or  when  required  by  a  majority  of  the  peo- 
ple." His  first  letter  to  the  Committee  of  Correspondence 
was  opposed,  and  sent  back  to  him  as  unsatisfactory.  He 
wrote  another  instead,  and  he  was  thereupon  nominated, 
the  following  letter  being  satisfactory. 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  91 

NEW  YORK,  October,  1836. 

GENTLEMEN  : — I  received  your  communication,  announcing  my 
"  nomination  for  the  office  of  Senator  for  the  First  Senatorial  District 
in  the  legislature  of  this  State,  by  the  Democratic  Party  friendly  to 
Equal  Rights  and  opposed  to  all  monopolies,"  with  those  feelings  of 
gratification  which  so  distinguished  an  honor  is  calculated  to  inspire. 
To  be  thus  noticed  by  any  portion  of  my  fellow-citizens,  would  com- 
mand my  gratitude ;  but  to  be  selected  to  fill  so  important  a  trust  by 
an  association  of  gentlemen  with  whom  I  htive  been  in  no  way  politi- 
cally connected,  who  have  not  been  impelled  by  their  present  numeri- 
cal strength,  but  by  the  inherent  purity  and  soundness  of  the  principles 
that  they  have  adopted  and  promulgated,  to  breast  the  storm  of  preju- 
dice, and  to  fall  or  be  sustained  by  the  rejection  or  approval  of  them — to 
be  thus  distinguished  by  you  elicits  from  me  the  warmest  gratitude. 
Accompanying  your  communication  is  the  "  Declaration  of  Rights, 
adopted  by  the  State  Convention  at  Utica,  Sept.  15,  1836,"  together 
with  sundry  questions  appended  thereto,  to  the  first  of  whic  h  you 
request  my  assent,  and  to  the  latter  my  answer. 

In  replying  to  this  portion  of  your  communication,  you  have  a  right 
to  require  that  frank  and  undisguised  response  that  has  characterized 
your  address  to  me. 

I  fully  concur  in  the  immediate  practical  adoption  of  the  first, 
second,  third,  and  seventh,  sections  of  the  Declaration  of  Right?  ;  in 
the  principles  contained  in  the  fourth,  and  to  be  applied  as  soon  as 
"  gold  and  silver,  which  is  the  only  safe  and  constitutional  currency," 
can  be  obtained  to  supply  the  necessary  demand  of  our  country ;  in 
the  fifth  and  sixth,  unless  the  enjoyment  or  participation  of  every 
such  vested  right  shall  be  equally  tendered  to  every  member  of  the 
community.  In  regard  to  the  eighth  article,  I  deem  that  the  greatest 
good  of  the  people,  from  whom  emanates  all  power  and  authority,  is 
particularly  to  be  consulted  ;  and  that  where  private  interest,  although 
sanctioned  by  legislative  authority,  conflicts  with  the  general  good,  the 
former  must  yield  to  the  latter. 

In  relation  to  the  remaining  inquiries,  I  reply  affirmatively  to  the 
1st,  2d,  4th,  5th,  6th,  and  7th.  In  reference  (3d)  to  the  election  of 
Judges  by  the  people,  and  for  a  limited  period  of  time,  the  constitu- 
tion provides  that  any  proposition  changing  its  features  shall  be  pre- 
sented to  one  legislature  and  acted  upon  by  the  succeeding  ;  and  this 
mode  of  ascertaining  the  feelings  and  views  of  the  people  of  this 
district  upon  this  subject,  will  be  cheerfully  sustained  by  me. 

Most  respectfully, 

F.  A.  TALLMADGE. 

The  reader  will  perceive  that,  in  consequence  of  the 
above  letter,  and  of  his  having  signed  the  Declaration 
of  Principles,  F.  A.  Tallmadge,  too,  became  a  Loco- 
Foco.  Oh  Proteus  !  thou  art  surely  the  governing  genius 
of  modern  politicians,  for  they  assume  all  shapes  and 


92  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

dimensions!  F.  A.  Tallmadge  became  State  Senator, 
because  he  had  become  a  Loco-Foco ;  and  he  is  now 
Recorder  of  the  city  of  New  York,  because  he  is  a 
thorough-going  Whig.  But  Mr.  Editor  Noah  said  that 
"  all's  fair  in  politics,"  and  he's  a  Judge,  who  has  nearly 
circumnavigated  the  whole  political  globe. 


CHAPTER   VII. 

Remarks — Sketch  of  Clinton  Roosevelt — Great  Equal  Rights  meeting 
at  Military  Hall — Sketch  of  E.  Curtis's  speech — Of  James  Mon- 
roe's— Each  of  the  nominations  adopted — The  General  Election — 
The  Result,  with  remarks  on  Edward  Curtis,  Ely  Moore,  C.  C. 
Cambreleng,  Ogden  Hoffman,  F.  A.  Tallmadge,  Robert  Townsend, 
Clinton  Roosevelt — Special  Election — Remarks — William  Leggett 
and  the  Plaindealer — Reflections — His  Martyrdom  and  brief  Eu- 
logy. 


Oh  world  take  note 
To  be  direct  and  honest  is  not  safe. 

SHAKSPKAHK. 

THE  Equal  Rights  Party  of  the  city  of  New  York  had 
nearly  completed  its  nominations  for  the  November  elec- 
tion, before  the  Nominating  Committee  of  the  Whig 
Party  made  any  nominations.  The  latter  towards  the 
conclusion  of  its  incubation,  with  the  view,  probably,  of 
inducing  the  Loco-Focos  to  return  the  compliment, 
adopted  Edward  Curtis  for  Congress,  F.  A.  Tallmadge 
for  the  State  Senate,  and  Robert  Townsend,  jun.,  and 
Clinton  Roosevelt,  for  the  Assembly.  The  Equal  Rights 
Party  did  not  reciprocate. 

Clinton  Roosevelt,  one  of  the  candidates  of  the  Whig 
and  Loco-Foco  parties,  is  an  honest  politician  of  consider- 
able talent  and  some  eccentricity.  Many  years  ago  he 
published  a  large  pamphlet  entitled  "  the  Mode  of  pro- 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO   PARTY.  93 

tecting  Domestic  Industry  by  operating  on  the  Currency." 
His  views,  at  that  time  considered  wild  and  wrong,  are 
now  advocated  by  the  most  thinking  men  in  the  Union  as 
wise  and  right.  His  mind  is  fertile  either  to  construct 
systems,  mechanical  machines,  or  literary  matter.  He 
comprehends  the  banking  system  so  fully,  that  he  is  ne- 
cessarily one  of  its  oldest  and  most  determined  foes,  as 
all  good  men  who  understand  it,  are. 

We  have  now  to  notice  an  "  overwhelming  meeting  of 
working-men  and  others  friendly  to  Equal  Rights,  Equal 
Laws,  and  Equal  Justice,  held  on  Friday  evening.  Nov.  4, 
at  the  Military  Hall,  Bowery,  opposite  Spring  ^Street,  at 
which  meeting  Daniel  Gorham  was  President,  and  John 
Commerford,  John  W.  Brown,  William  E.  Skidmore, 
Isaac  Odell,  Warden  Hayward,  John  H.  Bowie,  E.  D. 
Truesdell,  and  Paulus  Hedl,  were  Vice  Presidents,  and 
Levi  D.  Slamm,  John  A.  Riell,  Thomas  J.  Fenwick,  and 
R.  R.  Jones,  Secretaries."  It  was  truly  a  large  meeting, 
in  one  of  the  largest  rooms  in  the  city.  Messrs.  Curtis 
and  Monroe  attended,  and  addressed  the  assemblage. 
The  former  spoke  of  Revolutionary  reminiscences  in  his 
own  paternal  home.  Of  his  father,  a  blacksmith,  and 
a  patriot  of  the  Revolution.  He  described  the  affecting 
scene  of  that  father's  death,  and  dying  charge  to  the 
oldest  son.  He  and  his  audience  were  deeply  moved. 
Would  he,  then,  the  son  of  a  Revolutionary  patriot,  of  a 
working-man — would  he,  the  orator,  ever  prove  untrue 
to  the  cause  of  working-men,  the  principles  they  con- 
tended for  ?  No  !  If  he  ever  did,  might  his  right  arm 
be  withered !  Here  his  audience  applauded  him  with 
every  demonstration  of  applause.  He  then  added,  that 
"  some  might  call  him  a  Whig,  but  he  called  himself 
an  Equal  Rights  Democrat."  This  latter  declaration 
was  taken  as  an  additional  pledge  to  the  Equal  Rights 
party. 

Mr.  Monroe  also  spoke  with  great  earnestness  of  the 
just  principles  and  honesty  of  the  Equal  Rights  party. 
It  was  these  considerations  that  induced  him  to  be  a  c*^ 


94  HISTORY    OF    THE  [1836. 

date.  His  speech  was  no  doubt  sincere,  and  it  was  well 
received. 

"On  motion,  the  nominations  of  the  Equal  Rights 
party  were  individually  acted  on,  which  resulted  in  an 
unanimous  adoption  of  the  Gubernatorial,  Senatorial, 
Congressional,  and  Legislative  tickets." 

The  General  Election  took  place  soon  after  this  meet- 
ing. Edward  Curtis  was  elected  to  Congress  by  the 
united  vote  of  the  Loco-Foco,  Whig,  and  Native  American 
parties.  Eli  Moore  was  elected  by  the  united  vote 'of  the 
Loeo-Foco  and  Tammany  parties.  C.  C.  Cambreleng 
was  elected  by  the  vote  of  the  Tammany  party  and  many 
of  the  Loco-Focos  who  voted  for  him ;  and  Ogden  Hoff- 
man was  elected  by  the  Whig  party  and  the  votes  which 
his  professional  popularity  obtained  for  him. 

F.  A.  Tallmadge  was  elected  Senator  of  the  State  by 
the  vote  of  the  Loco-Foco,  Whig,  and  Native  American 
parties. 

Robert  Townsend,  Jr.,  and  Clinton  Roosevelt  were 
elected  to  the  House  of  Assembly  by  the  Loco-Foco  and 
Whig  parties. 

James  Gulic/c  was  elected  County  Register  by  votes 
of  all  parties.  His  majority  over  all  candidates  was 
several  thousands. 

Isaac  S.  Smith,  the  Equal  Rights  party  candidate  for 
Governor,  received  throughout  the  State  3,496  votes,  of 
which  about  1,400  were  in  the  city.  Moses  Jaques.  the 
candidate  for  Lieutenant-Governor,  obtained  3,532  votes. 
The  Loco-Foco  vote  in  the  city  for  him  was  over  1,400. 

By  this  election,  the  Monopoly  Republicans  elected 
only  six  candidates  out  of  thirteen  for  the  Assembly. 
They  were  also  defeated  with  respect  to  the  State  Sena- 
tor, and  two  of  the  members  of  Congress.  This  was  the 
third  blow  struck  by  the  friends  of  Equal  Rights  against 
the  system  of  Monopoly,  and  its  upholders  ;  but  this  last 
blow  was  the  sorest,  for  it  smote  them  in  the  State  and 
nation.  Yet  the  unreflecting  portion  of  the  political 
press,  and  the  gullible  readers  of  the  same,  could  see 


1836  ]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  95 

nothing  in  these  events,  but  agrarianism  and  office-hunt- 
ing. The  Washington  Globe,  the  Albany  Argus,  and 
Richmond  Enquirer,  through  policy,  behaved  according 
to  Bonaparte's  description  of  the  Bourbons.  The  valor- 
ous Don  Quixotte  never  belabored  the  windmill  harder 
than  the  above-named  presses  vituperated  the  Loco- 
Focos.  The  latter,  however,  knew  well  what  they  were 
about,  and  because  they  were  not  blinded  by  selfish  or 
narrow  considerations,  they  could  see  where  to  strike  and 
how  to  strike  the  system  of  monopoly. 

Now,  gentle  reader,  you  are  requested  to  pause  a  little, 
to  permit  an  off-hand  summing  up  to  be  made,  which 
shall  present  to  your  contemplation  a  prospective  synop- 
sis of  several  years,  and  the  results  to  some  of  the  candi- 
dates elected  in  the  city  of  New  York,  in  Nov.,  1836. 
First,  then,  Edward  Curtis,  the  Equal  Rights,  and  Federal 
Whig,  and  Native  American  member  of  Congress,  made 
his  debut  at  the  September  Session  of  1837,  and  voted  in 
effect  that  it  was  expedient  to  charter  a  National  Bank, 
to  the  amazement  of  the  Loco-Focos,  and  satisfaction  of 
the  Whigs,  for  which  he  was  again  elected  to  Congress 
in  1838,  by  fair  means  or  foul ;  but  this  is  best  known  to 
those  \vho  last  supported  him.  He  has  had  great  success 
politically,  being  now  Collector  of  the  Port  of  New  York, 
one  of  the  most  lucrative  offices  under  the  General  Gov- 
ernment. Had  he  realized  the  expectations  of  the  Loco- 
Focos,  wrould  he  have  reached  the  office  of  Collector  ? 

Second  comes  Mr.  Ogden  Hoffman,  who  formerly  stood 
high  in  the  Republican  party,  but  he  left  it  and  became 
a  Whig.  He  went  to  Congress  at  the  special  Session, 
1837,  and  made,  according  to  the  Whig  press,  a  splendid 
debut  in  that  body.  The  Democrat  of  former  years  voted 
like  a  genuine  Whig  in  Congress,  and  he  is  now  District 
Attorney  of  the  U.  S.  for  the  Southern  District  of  New 
York,  the  same  lucrative  office  which  was  lately  filled  by 
Wm.  M.  Price,  who  also  got  it  after  he  had  left  one  party 
and  joined  another. 

Eli  Moore   fulfilled   his   second    Congressional  term, 


96  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

and  he  pleased  all  his  constituents  who  voted  for  him ; 
but  in  1838  he  was  eschewed  by  the  majority  of  the 
voters  in  the  November  election.  Some  time  afterwards, 
he  was  appointed  to  the  office  of  Surveyor  of  the  Port 
of  New-York,  which  gives  a  salary  of  three  thousand 
dollars  per  year ;  an  extraordinary  position  of  profit  and 
honor  for  a  mechanic  to  reach,  in  a  government  where 
the  offices  are  monopolized  by  lawyers.  But  he  was  not 
permitted  to  hold  it  long,  for  the  election  of  General 
Harrison  effected  his  removal. 

C.  C.  Cambreleng,  decidedly  the  ablest  member  of  Con- 
gress from  this  city  during  very  many  years,  and  who 
fully  comprehended  its  commercial  interests  and  faithfully 
attended  to  them,  and  who  is  besides  a  man  in  whom 
there  is  no  dereliction  of  principle.  An  intelligently 
grateful  mercantile  community,  holding  that  the  "  post 
of  honor  is  a  private  station,"  has  considerately  consigned 
him  to  that  honorable  post. 

Frederick  A.  Tallmadge,  (elected  by  the  Loco-Focos 
and  the  Whigs,  and  we  believe  he  was  the  candidate  of 
the  Native  American  party  also,  for  men  of  his  enlarged 
capacity  can  embrace  all  parties,  and  all  principles  be- 
sides), went  to  the  State  Senate  and  served  his  term  of 
years,  much  to  the  satisfaction  of  the  Whigs,  and  but 
little  to  the  satisfaction  of  the  Loco-Focos.  We  know 
not  whether  he  pleased  the  party  of  one  little  idea,  the 
Native  American,  or  otherwise.  "  Blessed  are  they  who 
hope  nothing,  for  they  can't  be  disappointed ;"  and  the 
Loco-Focos  had  so  little  hope  in  him,  that  they  were  not 
violently  excited  by  his  course  in  the  Senate.  They  had 
adopted  him  as  their  candidate,  not  because  they  preferred 
him  personally  to  M.  L.  Smith,  but  because  they  could 
use  him  to  defeat  a  candidate  of  the  Monopoly  principle. 

Robert  Townsend,  Jr.,  went  to  the  House  of  Assembly, 
as  he  said  himself,  from  the  work-bench ;  and  he  who 
had  worked  honestly  as  a  mechanic,  knew  not  how  to  do 
otherwise  than  work  honestly  as  a  legislator.  He  pur- 
sued the  inexpedient  course  of  voting  against  all  mono- 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  97 

polies  in  the  house,  and  Mr.  Speaker  Livingston  attacked 
both  the  Loco-Foco  principles  and  their  honest  represen- 
tative, and  told  him  he  was  sure  of  being  only  "  a  one 
year's  man."  While  in  the  Assembly,  a  bill  was  intro- 
duced, giving  to  the  owners  of  property  on  Harlem  river 
and  Spuytendyvel  creek,  property  worlh  some  millions, 
which  Mr.  Townsend,  by  his  own  exertions,  prevented 
being  done ;  and  notwithstanding  his  public  spirit  on  this 
and  other  occasions,  yet  the  prophecy  of  Livingston  was 
absolutely  fulfilled  by  a  grateful  and  intelligent  con- 
stituency. 

Clinton  Roosevelt  went  also  to  the  house  of  Assembly 
a  Loco-Foco,  and  as  his  course  was  of  the  same  character 
as  Mr.  Townsend's,  he  shared  the  same  fate,  and  turned 
out  to  be  "  a  one  year's  man  "  likewise. 

With  regard  to  the  other  members  of  Assembly  from 
the  city,  elected  in  1836,  each  went  with  his  party  in  all 
things,  and  they  did  so  little  of  themselves  individually 
to  deserve  notice,  that  they  are  political  nonentities,  ex- 
cept only  when  collectively  considered,  as  entering  into 
the  mass  of  a  party  ;  consequently  the  political  history 
of  the  party  is  all  that  is  necessary  to  the  reader  respect- 
ing them,  and  to  that  he  is  referred. 

In  consequence  of  a  tie  between  two  of  the  candidates 
for  Assembly,  a  special  election  was  ordered  for  one 
member  in  December.  Morris  Franklin  was  nominated 
by  the  Federal  Whigs,  Elijah  F.  Purdy  by  the  Tammany 
or  Monopoly  Democrats,  and  Moses  Jaques  by  the  Equal 
Rights  party.  Efforts  were  made  to  induce  the  Loco- 
Focos  to  nominate  Mr.  Purdy,  but  he  was  the  candidate 
of  a  party  which  sustained  monopoly,  and  to  support  him 
was  to  support  the  system.  Franklin  was  elected,  and, 
as  usual,  contumely  and  abuse  fell  to  the  lot  of  the  Loco- 
Focos.  The  latter  saw  that  the  chastising  would  do 
good,  for  they  knew  that  all  the  arguments  and  clear  rea- 
sonings in  the  world  would  effect  no  reform  in  the  policy 
of  the  Republican  party,  so  long  as  it  was  annually 
elected  into  power.  To  defeat  it  therefore  in  this  respect 


98  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836, 

was  the  only  way  to  reform  it,  by  compelling  it  to  fall 
back  upon  its  original  principles  which  it  never  fails  to 
do  as  its  last  resort,  in  all  its  worst  discomfitures.  In 
like  manner,  it  is  only  when  the  Ottoman  Empire  is  in 
great  danger,  that  the  standard  of  the  Prophet  is  raised, 
and  then  every  faithful  Mussulman  rallies  around  it. 

In  the  beginning  of  December,  1836,  William  Leggett 
commenced  the  publication  of  a  new  weekly  periodical 
in  octavo  form,  which  he  named  the  Plain  Dealer.  In 
its  arrangement  of  subjects,  it  was  somewhat  after  the 
manner  of  the  London  Examiner,  a  periodical  which  Mr. 
Leggett  held  in  high  estimation.  He  spared  no  mental 
exertion  to  make  the  Plain  Dealer  worthy  of  himself  and 
the  public  patronage.  On  all  public  questions,  he  was 
guided  by  the  democratic  principle,  and  some  of  his  best 
written  articles  are  in  that  Journal ;  but  he  wrote  no 
longer  with  the  same  Promethean  fire  as  formerly,  for  it 
seemed  by  his  latter  compositions,  as  if  many  years  had 
passed  over  his  head  since  1835.  The  Plain  Dealer  con- 
tinued to  be  published  nearly  a  year.  Some  time  after  it 
ceased,  he  had  intimations  from  a  high  source  that  he 
could  get  office  under  the  General  Government.  He 
replied  that  he  "  could  saw  wood."  He  gradually  sunk 
under  the  effects  of  that  disease  which  was  first  brought 
upon  him,  or  at  least  aggravated  by  the  excitements, 
harassments  and  persecutions  of  1835.  In  that  year,  he 
was  martyred.  The  demon  spirit  of  monopoly  had  con- 
demned him  ;  and  the  organs  of  "  the  party,"  and  the 
committees  of  "  the  party,"  were  but  the  executioners  of 
the  condemnation.  He  felt  the  martyrdom  at  that  time, 
and  then  told  some  of  his  friends,  "  They  are  killing  me." 

Towards  the  last  of  his  days,  through  the  persuasion 
of  friends,  he  consented  to  go  to  Central  America  for  his 
health's  sake,  and  an  appointment  was  obtained  for  him  ; 
but  it  was  in  vain  ;  the  end  of  the  martyrdom  was  near, 
and  it  was  but  right  that  the  termination  should  take 
place  in  the  land  where  it  had  its  commencement.  That 
great  man  is  no  more  !  We  say  great,  because  there 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  99 

never  lived  a  man  with  more  of  the  true  heroic  in  him,  or 
more  truly  the  hero  of  the  rights  of  humanity,  than  Wil- 
liam Leggett. 


CHAPTER    VIII. 

Park  meeting,  proceedings,  and  flour  riot — Description  and  facts 
respecting  it — Address  of  Committee  to  the  public — Sketches  of 
some  members  of  the  Committee — Ming  selected  as  a  Victim,  but 
a  man  not  to  be  Victimized — Whig  logic  and  Loco-Foco  syllogism 
— Another  Park  meeting,  March  6th,  in  Vindication  of  Constitu- 
tional Rights — Address  and  Resolutions — Sketch  of  John  H.  Hunt 
— Another  Park  meeting  called  for  April  3d. 

"  As  the  currency  expands  the  loaf  contracts." 

Loco-Foco  BANNER. 

THE  month  of  January,  1837,  presents  nothing  worthy 
of  note  in  the  annals  of  the  Loco-Foco  party.  About 
the  beginning  of  February,  the  high  prices  of  the  neces- 
saries of  life  were  severely  felt  by  the  working  population 
of  the  city,  and  discontent  was  extensively  prevailing, 
especially  towards  the  flour  dealers ;  and  the  Loco-Focos 
were  up  against  Bank  Monopolies,  which  afforded  facili- 
ties to  speculators.  In  old  times,  the  price  of  a  bushel 
of  wheat  was  paid  to  the  working  man  for  each  day  of 
his  labor,  so  that  he  was  no  sufferer,  when  wheat  rose  in 

Erice;  but  in  modern  times,  the  high  price  of  the  staff  of 
fe,  works  no  increase  of  wages  of  labor.  It  was  alleged 
in  1837  that  the  shortness  of  the  crop  was  the  cause  of 
flour  being  up  as  high  as  fourteen  dollars  a  barrel ;  but 
there  was  no  shortness  of  crop  in  coal,  and  that  was  up 
to  fourteen  dollars  a  ton ;  neither  was  there  a  shortness 
of  crop  in  houses,  and  yet  a  great  increase  of  rent  was 
demanded. 

Making  all  reasonable  allowance  for  shortness  of  sup 
ply,  there  was  another  cause  at  work.  A  portion  of  the 
high  price  in  all  the  necessaries  of  life  could  be  safely 


100  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

charged  to  the  working  of  the  bank  monopoly  system. 
Loco-Focoism  shed  some  light  upon  the  cause,  and  by  a 
single  sentence  gave  a  solution  as  ample  as  a  volume 
could  furnish,  namely  "  As  the  currency  expands,  the 
loaf  contracts." 

Ever  vigilant  in  its  opposition  to  all  monopolies,  the 
Equal  Rights  Party  seized  the  present  occasion  as  favor- 
able to  its  constant  object,  to  overcome  its  enemy.  With 
this  view,  and  to  strengthen  itself  in  public  opinion,  a 
meeting  was  called  in  the  Park  by  large  bills  posted 
throughout  the  city,  as  follows : 

BREAD,  MEAT,  RENT,  AND  FUEL! 

Their  prices  must  come  down  ! 
ID-The  VOICE  of  THE  PEOPLE  shall  be  heard  and  will  prevail ! 

The  people  will  meet  in  the  Park,  rain  or  shine,  at  4  o'clock,  P. 
M.,  on  Monday  afternoon,  to  inquire  into  the  cause  of  the  present 
unexampled  distress  and  to  devise  a  suitable  remedy.  All  friends  of 
humanity  determined  to  resist  monopolists  and  extortioners  are  invited 
to  attend. 

MOSES  JAQUES,  WARDEN  HAYWARD, 

PAULUS  HEDL,  DANIEL  GORHAM, 

DANIEL  A.  ROBERTSON,  ALEXANDER  MING,  Jr. 
JOHN  WINDT. 

The  afternoon  of  the  13th  Feb.,  1837,  was  intensely 
cold  and  extremely  windy,  and  yet  the  meeting  in  the 
Park  presented  a  dense  multitude  of  many  thousands. 
The  venerable  Moses  Jaques  was  chosen  Chairman,  and 
there  was  he,  who  had  seen  over  sixty  winters,  standing 
on  a  platform  the  most  exposed  to  the  inclemency  of  the 
blast,  his  countenance  expressive  of  that  righteous  bene- 
volence, which  told  us  plainly  as  the  hand  of  God  could 
write  it  on  the  face  of  man,  that  his  heart  was  with  the 
people,  devoted  to  the  cause  of  humanity.  Alexander 
Ming,  jun.,  ever  one  of  the  foremost  in  the  same  cause, 
addressed  the  people  with  his  usual  fearlessness  of  conse- 
quences to  himself.  He  told  them  that  the  resolutions 
in  his  hand  traced  the  present  state  of  things  to  the  right 
cause,  "  Our  monstrous  banking  system."  That  the 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  101 

banks  were  the  oppressors  of  the  poor,  for  they  fostered 
speculations  in  real  estate,  which  raised  rents,  and  they 
afforded  facilities  to  forestalling  of  provisions,  which 
raised  the  prices  of  the  necessaries  of  life.  But  he  ex- 
horted his  fellow  citizens  to  seek  peaceful  remedies  for 
public  grievances,  "  to  do  no  act  which  might  bring  into 
disrepute  the  fair  fame  of  a  New  Yorker,  the  honor  of  a 
citizen  of  this  Republic,  or  the  character  of  man."  He 
then  proceeded  to  read  the  following  preamble,  and  a 
series  of  resolutions,  some  of  which  are  selected. 

PREAMBLE. 

When  in  the  course  of  human  events  it  becomes  necessary  for  the 
many  to  declare  hostility  against  the  rapacity  of  the  few,  who  wil- 
fully impoverish  and  oppress  them,  a  decent  respect  for  the  opinions 
of  mankind  demands  that  those  grievances  should  be  recited  which 
impel  the  great  body  of  the  people  to  speak  the  sentiments  and  ener- 
getic language  dictated  by  the  first  law  of  nature — self-preservation. 
Whereas,  then,  it  is  self-evident  that  with  a  sufficiency  of  provi- 
sions and  the  necessaries  of  life  in  our  country,  we  are  nevertheless 
at  this  period  in  the  midst  of  famine,  and  threatened  with  a  continu- 
ance of  the  same.  Every  article  of  necessity — bread  stuffs,  flesh 
meats,  fuel  and  house  rents,  are  at  exorbitant  rates  ;  and  an  increase 
is  demanded  beyond  the  means  of  the  working  and  useful  classes  of  the 
community.  Conspiracies,  combinations,  and  speculations  have  been 
fostered  until  an  unnatural  state  of  things  exists,  jeopardizing  human 
life  itself — the  liberties,  independence  and  happiness  of  the  people  ; 
but  before  remedies  can  be  devised  for  evils  which  afflict  the  body 

„  politic,  the  root  from  which  those  evils  emanate  must  be  laid  bare. 

I  The  voice  of  the  people  emphatically  declares,  and  facts  demonstrate, 
that  our  monstrous  banking  system  is  the  prime  original  cause  of  the 
present  state  of  things.  ^  Banks  have  fostered  extravagant  specula- 
tions in  real  estate,  and  consequently  the  enormous  increase  of  rents. 
Their  extraordinary  issues  and  accommodations  have  enabled  fore- 
stallers  to  buy  up  and  hoard  up  all  the  provisions  in  the  land,  and 
consequently  to  extort  any  price  their  horrible  avarice  demands. 
Therefore, 

Resolved — That  we  view  the  power  exercised  by  banking  com- 
panies in  controlling  the  currency  of  the  country  as  unconstitutional, 
and  "  more  dangerous  to  the  liberties  of  the  people  than  that  of  a 
standing  army." 

Resolved — That  the  system  of  finance  in  general  use,  and  upon 
which  the  revenues  of  ALL  our  public  bodies  are  at  present  raised, 
ought  to  be  abolished  with  the  least  practical  delay,  and  in  place 
thereof  a  system  of  direct  taxation  substituted ;  that  our  present 
vicious  system  has  been  the  prolific  parent  of  national  debts,  state 
9* 


102  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

debts  ;  city,  corporation  and  town  loans ;  that  from  these  have  sprung 
a  species  of  taxation,  so  subtle  and  indirect  in  its  operation,  that  it  is 
difficult  to  trace  it  through  all  its  ramifications  and  passes  to  its  ulti- 
mate abstraction  of  a  large  amount  of  our  property,  and  terrible 
infringements  on  our  rights  and  liberty ;  that,  from  the  means  thus 
covertly  taken  from  us,  have  sprung  up  among  us,  and  over  us,  ALL 
those  odious  monopolies,  and  iron  bonds  upon  the  free  exercise  of  our 
liberty  by  which  we  are  bound,  robbed,  oppressed  and  insultingly 
derided. 

Resolved — That  the  true  remedy  for  tJie  people,  which  will  reduce  the 
price  of  all  the  necessaries  of  life  is,  that  every  workingman  refuse 
paper  money  inpayment  for  his  services,  or  demand  specie  of  the  banks 
for  all  notes  paid  to  him. 

The  following  memorial  was  also  adopted  by  the 
meeting : 

To  the  Legislature  of  the  State  of  New  York,  in  Senate  and  Assembly 

convened. 

The  Memorial  of  the  Great  Public  Meeting  of  the  Citizens  of  New 
.  York,  convened  in  the  Park,  on  Monday,  February  13th,  1837, 

represents : — 

That  your  memorialists  are  suffering  under  a  vast  accumulation  of 
distress  and  privation,  produced  by  that  curse  of  modern  times  and 
modern  legislation — the  Paper  Money  System.  Wrong  in  principle, 
and  unconstitutional  in  its  existence,  its  pernicious  influences,  moral 
and  political,  have  long  been  felt  and  deplored ;  but  it  has  been  re- 
served for  this  period  to  show  how  great  an  amount  of  misery  it  is 
capable  of  inflicting  upon  a  people.  By  its  "  stimulants,"  gambling 
speculators  have  raised  the  prices  of  real  estate  to  such  a  height,  that 
rents  are  beyond  the  means  of  the  honest  and  industrious  classes ; 
by  its  "  facilities,"  avaricious  monopolists  hare  obtained  possession 
of  a  large  proportion  of  the  necessaries  of  life,  and  are  demanding  the 
most  exorbitant  prices ;  whilst  its  effects  on  the  people,  in  a  national 
point  of  view,  are  equally  disastrous,  by  the  high  nominal  prices  it 
has  produced,  through  which  the  industry  of  the  farmer,  mechanic, 
manufacturer  and  laborer  is  sacrificed,  for  the  benefit  of  the  tyrants 
of  Europe  !  Connected  with  the  great  fraud  of  Paper  Money  is  the 
system  of  Public  Finance,  now  50  generally  in  vogue  in  this  country, 
from  State  Governments  down  to  Village  Incorporations,  consisting 
of  the  creation  of  stocks,  loans,  and  other  forms  of  debt,  which  result 
in  the  abstraction  of  an  enormous  amount,  in  various  indirect  ways, 
from  the  pockets  of  the  people ;  and  tend  to  carelessness,  extrava- 
gance, and  waste  of  the  public  money,  and  consequently  increase  the 
burdens  of  the  citizen. 

In  view  of  these  premises,  your  memorialists  earnestly  pray : — 

1.  The  speedy  prohibition  of  all  bank  notes  under  the  denomina- 
tion of  one  hundred  dollars. 

2.  The  abolition  of  all  indirect  taxes,  and  the  system  of  finance 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  103 

resting  on  public  debt ;  and  in  lieu  thereof,  substituting  direct  taxes 
on  real  and  personal  estate. 

3.  The  abrogation  of  all  inspectorships  over  articles  of  commerce. 

4.  The  repeal  of  all  laws  under  which  the  Common  Council  of  the 
City  of  New  York  restrain  or  prohibit  the  freedom  of  trade ;  and  all 
other  laws  by  which  they  levy  indirect  taxes  on  the  people. 

The  grievous  burden  of  indirect  taxation  imposed  on  your  memo- 
rialists by  the  Paper  Money  and  Banking  System  of  the  State — pro- 
bably far  greater  than  that  paid  by  them  into  both  the  National  and 
State  Treasury,  and  for  which  they  receive  nothing  but  oppression 
and  misery — urges  them  to  pray  for  an  early  attention  to  their  case. 
By  order  of  the  meeting, 

M.  JAQUES,  President. 


These  proceedings  had  scarcely  been  approved  of  by 
the  assemblage,  when  a  stream  of  population,  which  had 
come  down  Chatham  street,  entered  the  Park,  and  then  a 
man  mounted  the  platform  and  addressed  the  multitude. 
His  speech  was  directed  against  the  flour  dealers,  and  he 
added  "  go  to  the  flour  stores  and  offer  a  fair  price,  and 
if  refused,  take  the  flour."  No  sooner  had  he  ut- 
tered those  words,  than  the  president  of  the  meeting, 
Mr,  Jaques,  interposed  promptly,  and  with  the  assistance 
of  the  officers  of  the  meeting  pulled  him  off  the  stand. 
The  meeting  then  peaceably  adjourned.  But  according 
to  Mayor  Clark's  statement  some  one  cried  out  "  Hart's 
flour  store ;"  and  said  a  neutral  paper  of  that  period, 
"  a  body  of  nearly  one  thousand  persons  separated  from 
the  general  mass,  and  proceeded  to  Washington  street, 
and  commenced  an  attack  upon  the  store  of  Eli  Hart  and 
Co.,  the  well  known  flour  merchants  of  173  £  175  of 
that  street,  completely  filled  from  the  floor  to  the  ceil- 
ing, from  the  basement  to  the  roof,  from  the  front  to  the 
rear,  with  barrels  of  flour  and  bags  of  wheat." 

"  The  store  was  soon  entered,"  Mayor  Clark  states, 
"  barrels  of  flour  thrown  out  and  dashed  to  pieces  in 
Washington  street.  Mayor  Lawrence  with  a  few  officers 
repaired  thither,  but  he  and  they  were  driven  away.  In 
a  short  time  the  mob  had  undisputed  possession  of  that 
vast  storehouse.  Many  of  Mr.  Hart's  books  and  papers 


104  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837- 

were  seized,  torn  and  scattered  along  the  public  streets. 
One  of  the  Journals  of  that  day  stated  that  Mr.  Hart's 
loss  was  about  500  barrels  of  flour  and  1000  bushels 
of  wheat.  This  is  probably  a  high  estimate." 

"  There  were  depredations  committed  on  the  same 
night  on  other  flour  stores  in  the  city.  Fifty-three  of  the 
rioters  were  apprehended  by  the  police." 

A  portion  of  the  city  press  would  not  let  such  a  chance 
escape  of  attaching  infamy  to  the  Loco-Focos.  Alexan- 
der'Ming  was  falsely  charged  with  having  uttered  the 
words,  "  go  to  the  flour  stores  and  offer  a  fair  price  for 
flour,  and  if  refused,  take  the  flour."  The  portion  of  the 
city  press  alluded  to,  is  that  which  is  subsidized  by  the 
advertising  and  other  patronage  of  the  monopoly  and 
commercial  aristocracy.  Such  a  mercenary  press,  ever 
anxious  to  show  its  vassalage  to  the  interests  of  its  lords, 
is  always  up,  and  more  eager  to  oppose  reform  and  re- 
formers than  its  masters  are  themselves.  Hence  those 
venal  presses  were  only  laboring  in  their  vocation 
when  they  slandered  and  reviled  the  Loco-Focos,  who 
were  reformers  contending  for  just  principles,  and  not 
flour  rioters. 

But  it  afterwards  came  out,  as  stated  by  the  Journal  of 
Commerce,  which  sometimes  gives  sudden  emissions  of 
conscientious  acknowledgments,  that  "  a  letter  was  found 
in  the  Park  some  days  before  the  meeting  took  place, 
addressed  to  Mr.  H.  Lennox  by  an  anonymous  person,  in- 
forming him  that  the  store  of  Hart  &  Co.  was  to  be  plun- 
dered one  of  these  nights  by  a  large  party  of  men,  and 
that  in  order  to  enable  them  to  carry  their  design  into 
execution,  two  alarms  of  fire  were  to  be  given,  one  near 
the  Battery,  and  the  other  higher  up  the  city,  and  whilst 
the  watchmen  and  police  were  assembled  at  these  two 
points,  the  conspirators  were  to  break  open  the  store  arid 
carry  off  the  flour.  The  letter  was  brought  to  high  con- 
stable Hays,  who  showed  it  to  Hart  &  Co.  Besides  this, 
other  anonymous  letters  of  a  similar  import  cime  to 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  105 

the  Mayor,  who  caused  the  contents  to  be  made  known 
to  Hart  &  Co." 

Of  the  fifty-three  rioters  arrested  by  the  public  author- 
ities, not  one  was  a  Loco-Foco.  Had  there  been  even 
one,  it  would  have  gone  forth  from  the  city  press  to  the 
whole  Union  as  proof  against  the  whole  party.  Besides, 
the  latter  appointed  a  committee  to  examine  the  rolls  of 
names  of  the  members  of  the  party,  with  the  view  of 
expelling  any  guilty  member,  and  not  one  was  found. 
How  could  men  who  were  strenuously  contending  for 
Rights,  be  the  perpetrators  of  wrongs  ?  Above  all  these 
facts,  the  whole  history  of  the  party  was  proof,  that  it  was 
against  monopolies  by  legislation,  and  especially  banks, 
•that  the  Equal  Rights  Democracy  were  contending  ;  and 
the  last  resolution  passed  at  the  Park  meeting  was  "  that 
the  true  remedy  for  the  people,  which  will  reduce  the  price 
of  all  the  necessaries  of  life  is,  that  every  working  man 
refuse  paper  money  in  payment  for  his  services,  or  de- 
mand specie  at  the  banks  for  all  notes  paid  to  him. 

The  Committee  which  called  the  meeting  in  the  Park, 
published  the  following  defence. 
FELLOW  CITIZENS  : — 

The  undersigned  publish,  as  an  act  of  justice  to  themselves,  as 
citizens  of  this  community,  the  following  as  an  answer  to  the  many 
unfounded  reports  which  have  appeared  in  the  public  prints  of  this 
city,  relative  to  our  motives  and  acts  at  the  meeting  of  citizens  held 
in  the  Park,  on  the  13th  instant.  We  trust  that  the  papers  of  this 
city  will  no  longer  be  held  as  the  index  of  the  public  morals. 

We  were  appointed  a  Committee  by  a  meeting  of  citizens  previous- 
ly held  at  the  Military  and  Civic  Hall,  Bowery.  In  pursuance  of 
such  appointment,  notices  were  published  in  several  of  the  papers, 
and  by  handbills,  inviting  the  people  to  assemble  in  the  Park,  and  in- 
quire into  the  causes  of  the  present  high  prices  of  living,  and  to  pro- 
pose a  remedy. 

The  people  assembled  at  the  time  and  place,  and  patiently  and  in 
a  most  peaceable  and  orderly  manner  heard  the  preamble  and  resolu- 
tions read,  which  they  unanimously  adopted.  The  memorial  was 
then  read,  and  ordered  to  be  signed  by  the  officers  of  the  meeting, 
and  forwarded  to  the  Legislature  of  this  State.  The  meeting  then 
adjourned,  after  having  been  advised  to  retire  peaceably  to  their 
homes  ;  and  we  had  every  reason  to  hope  and  expect  that  they  would 
do  so,  as  there  was  not  the  least  disposition  manifested  while  in  the 


106  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1835. 

Park  either  to  riot  or  disorder.  The  "  right  of  the  people  peaceably  to 
assemble,  and  to  petition  the  government  for  a  redress  of  grievances," 
is  guaranteed  to  us  by  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States.  For  the 
riots  that  ensued  we  can  be  no  more  accountable  than  the  framers  of 
the  Constitution  by  which  that  inestimable  right  is  secured. 

We  do  not  expect  our  motives  and  actions  to  be  duly  appreciated 
at  this  time  of  excitement,  when  the  hireling  presses  of  the  different 
factions  are  vying  with  each  other  by  abuse  and  misrepresentation 
to  break  up  a  party  who  are  advocating  the  Equal  Rights  of  the 
People,  and  which  will,  if  not  destroyed  by  the  treachery  of  pretended 
friends,  ultimately  obtain  the  ascendency  in  this  State  and  the  Union. 
We  fear  no  moral  force,  for  that  is  with  us  ;  nor  can  we  be 'deterred 
from  our  duty  by  physical  force,  though  we  may  be  temporarily  injur- 
ed by  it.  We  court  no  sympathy  or  indulgence  from  the  public,  nor 
forbearance  of  the  press ;  but  we  demand  our  rights  as  citizens  of 
this  once  boasted  land  of  freedom ;  we  ask  the  equal  justice  guaran- 
teed to  us  by  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States,  and  secured  to  us 
by  the  charter  of  the  State  of  New  York. 

MOSES  JAQUES,  DANIEL  GORHAM, 

PAULUS  HEDL,  JOHN  WINDT, 

DANIEL  A.  ROBERTSON,  ALEXANDER  MING,  jr. 
WARDEN  HAYWARD. 

Moses  Jaques,  Alexander  Ming,  jr.,  and  John  Windt, 
have  been  already  personally  introduced  to  the  reader. 
The  other  members  of  the  committee  are  now  presented. 

Paulus  Hedl  has  lived  in  the  city  of  New-York  near- 
ly forty  years,  and  so  upright  and  blameless  has  been  his 
conduct,  that  he  has  not  a  personal  enemy,  though  few 
men  have  had  more  intercourse  with  their  fellow  citizens. 
It  would  not  be  easy  to  find  in  any  part  of  the  world,  an 
honester  man  and  a  more  ingenious  mechanic  than 
Paulus  Hedl.  Excellent  as  a  draughtsman,  skilful  as  a 
practical  workman,  he  stood  at  the  head  of  the  business 
he  followed,  the  originator  of  the  ornamental  and  fancy  iron 
railing  and  palisading  for  which  New-York  has  been  dis- 
tinguished above  any  city  in  the  Union.  So  just  a  man 
could  be  nothing  else  in  politics  than  a  Loco-Foco. 

Daniel  Gorham  is  as  good-natured  a  man  as  can  be 
found  in  the  ordinary  range  of  city  life ;  so  much  so,  that 
he  never  sees  the  dark  side  of  men  or  things,  for  he  thinks 
no  harm  of  others,  and  naturally  concludes  that  others 
think  no  harm  of  him.  No  one  looking  in  the  man's 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  107 

face  could  for  a  moment  suppose  him  a  flour  rioter ;  to 
impute  such  a  thing  to  him  would  provoke  his  hearty 
laugh,  for  he  would  take  the  imputation  as  a  joke.  He 
is  the  father  of  a  numerous  family,  and  has  been  a  grand- 
father for  several  years. 

Daniel  A.  Robertson,  a  young  man  of  genteel  manners 
and  appearance,  and  of  respectable  character.  He  is 
now  ( 1842)  the  Editor  of  a  periodical  in  Cincinnati  in 
the  State  of  Ohio,  called  « the  Elevator." 

Warden  Hayward,  the  father  of  a  numerous  family, 
—some  of  his  children  are  grown.  A  man  more  disposed 
to  obey  the  laws  of  his  country  does  not  exist ; — in  fact 
it  would  be  difficult  to  find  one  more  of  a  stickler  for 
Constitutions,  laws  and  rules  than  Warden  Hayward. 
His  religious  sentiments  have  contributed  to  make  him 
a  devotee  of  Loco-Focoism,  which  he  construes  to  mean 
Christian  Equality  and  constitutional  Liberty.  His  en- 
thusiasm in  the  cause  is  of  the  quiet  kind,  in  consequence 
of  his  natural  diffidence  ;  but  it  is  intense  and  permanent. 

Reader,  were  you  to  go  into  any  church  in  Christendom, 
you  might  around  the  altar  find  seven  as  good  men  in  a 
social  and  moral  point  of  view,  as  M.  Jaques,  P,  Hedl, 
Daniel  Gorham,  John  Windt,  Alexander  Ming,  jr.,  D.  A. 
Robertson,  and  Warden  Hayward,  but  you  could  not  find 
seven  men  possessing  in  the  aggregate,  more  moral  worth, 
more  mental  capacity  and  respectability  of  character  ;  and 
notwithstanding  these  considerations,  they  were  accused 
of  getting  up  the  flour  riot. 

No  Loco-Foco  was  arrested,  nor  could  suspicion  be 
fixed  on  any  member  of  the  party,  of  being  concerned  in 
the  flour  riot,  and  this  was  very  provoking.  Nevertheless 
a  Victim  was  wanted,  and  one,  too,  who  must  be  a  Loco- 
Foco.  Ming  was  the  only  one  that  could  be  got  at ;  his 
name  was  published  under  the  call  of  the  meeting  ;  he 
had  figured  popularly  at  it,  he  was  an  office-holder  :  and 
here  then  was  the  man  for  the  Collector  of  the  Port 


108  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

(Samuel  Swartwout)*  to  show  his  public  spirit  upon,  and 
an  opportunity  to  please  the  merchant  princes,  or  at  least 
the  presses  they  had  subsidized. 

Ming  was  turned  out  of  office  at  once.  It  is  an  old 
trick  of  aristocracy  to  inflict  suffering  on  the  wife  and 
children,  in  order,  by  this  mode  of  torture,  to  break  the 
spirit  of  independence  in  the  husband  and  father.  The 
trick  failed,  however,  this  time,  for  Ming's  spirit  would 
neither  break  nor  bend.  He  addressed  the  head  of  the 
department  at  Washington  : — "  In  being  suspected  in  the 
remotest  manner,  as  the  instigator  or  abettor  of  a  mob, 
— I  am  slandered  in  my  moral  and  political  character, 
slandered  as  a  citizen,  as  a  husband,  as  a  father,  as  a 
man."  "  All  I  ask,  all  I  would  demand  is  common  just- 
ice. If  the  holding  of  a  subordinate  situation  under  the 
fovernment, — this  free,  equal  American  Government,  I 
may  not  peaceably  assemble  with  my  fellow-citizens  to 
petition  for  a  redressal  of  grievances,  then  my  taking  of 
office  deprives  me  of  constitutional  rights,  and  I'll  none 
on't." 

"  No  !  I  cannot,  will  not  believe,  that  an  administration, 
democratically  formed  and  democratic  in  its  practice  and 
assertions,  will  thus  permit  a  democrat  to  be  sacrificed  on 
the  shrine  of  Oligarchy."  This  was  the  indignant  lan- 
guage of  a  man,  with  the  spirit  of  manhood  in  him,  and 
it  could  not  be  evaded  or  disregarded.  He  was  reinstated. 
Still  there  were  men  who  had  made  up  their  minds  that 
the  Loco-Focos  were  guilty,  notwithstanding  every  proof  to 
the  contrary,  and  they  would  not  be  so  fallible  as  to  change 
an  opinion.  These  men  asserted  it  as  an  infallible  fact, 
"  that  if  the  Loco-Focos  had  held  no  Park  meeting,  there 
would  have  been  no  flour  riot."  This  accusation  was  met 
at  an  Equal  Rights  meeting  with  becoming  gravity  by 
Resolutions,"  that  if  there  had  been  no  Park  for  the  people 
to  meet  in,  or  if  there  had  been  no  people  to  assemble 

*  He  in  the  summer  following  went  to  Washington  in  behalf  of  the 
merchant  princes.  He  came  near  being  Whig  candidate  for  the  vice 
presidency. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  109 

there,  no  public  meeting  would  have  taken  place.  That 
the  people  should  be  shot  down,  and  the  Park  laid  off  in 
building  lots  and  sold  at  auction  to  prevent  all  Park  meet- 
ings in  future,  and  consequently,  all  flour  riots." 

However, "  that  the  best  way  to  prevent  riots,  is  to  re- 
move the  causes,  and  as  the  men  who  called  the  meeting, 
were  undoubtedly  the  cause  of  the  high  prices  of  bread, 
meat,  rent,  and  fuel,  that  they  should  therefore  be  removed 
by  extermination." 

Nothing  daunted  by  what  had  occurred,  nor  by  threats 
of  military  force  in  the  event  of  another  Park  meeting, 
the  Equal  Rights  party  called  one  for  the  6th  of  March, 
declaring  "  that  it  was  a  constitutional  right  of  the  people 
to  assemble  for  a  redress  of  grievances.  That  to  array 
the  Police,  or  to  order  out  the  uniformed  Militia  for  the 
purpose  of  intimidation  was  unconstitutional.  That  the 
strongest  force  was  moral  force,  and  that  each  citizen  at- 
tending the  meeting  should  voluntarily  aid  in  the  preserva- 
tion of  the  peace,  and  therefore  be  watchful  as  to  any  overt 
acts  of  the  armed  levies,  against  the  people."  The  Park 
meeting  of  the  6th  of  March  was  much  more  numerous 
than  that  of  13th  Feb.  By  some  it  was  estimated  at  forty 
thousand  persons,  and  was  certainly  over  thirty  thousand. 
Alexander  Ming  was  the  presiding  officer  of  the  vast  con- 
gregation, by  the  unanimous  voice  of  all  present.  He 
made  an  excellent  speech,  which  was  received  with  accla- 
mations of  applause  by  the  multitude.  The  following 
Report  from  the  Committee  chosen  for  the  purpose,  was 
then  read  and  unanimously  adopted. 

"  The  Committee  appointed  at  a  former  meeting  to  report  on  the 
causes  of  the  present  high  prices  of  provisions,  rent,  and  fuel,  sub- 
mit the  following 

REPORT. 

To  explain  fully  the  causes  and  operation  of  any  evil  under  which 
the  community  may  be  suffering,  it  is  necessary  to  call  attention  to 
the  constitution  of  society  itself.  , 

If  society  were  in  its  natural  state — if  each  man  were  permitted 
to  exercise,  untrammelled,  those  rights  and  powers  with  which  the 
God  of  Nature  has  endowed  him — high  prices  could  be  produced  only 
10 


110  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

by  scarcity,  and  scarcity  only  by  bad  seasons,  war,  or  other  calamity, 
or  improvidence. 

But  our  people  have  not  been  at  war ;  they  have  not  been  unusu- 
ally wasteful  or  lazy ;  they  have  had  but  little  sickness,  save  that 
heart-sickness  which  must  ever  be  felt  by  all  who  are  conscious  me- 
nials of  speculators  and  drones ;  and  even  admitting  that  the  season 
was  as  unfavorable  as  interested  persons  pretend,  there  certainly  has 
been  no  blight  or  mildew  sufficiently  destructive  to  cut  off  our  coal 
mines,  or  create  a  scarcity  of  lots  and  houses.  We  must  therefore 
look  to  other  causes ;  and  as  the  true  ones  are  plain  and  simple,  we 
will  state  them  in  plain  words. 

In  perhaps  all  densely  peopled  countries,  that  earth  from  which 
everything  must  draw  its  subsistence  is  considered  the  exclusive  pro- 
perty of  a  chosen  few,  not  one  in  fifty  having  the  legal  right  to  plant 
a  fruit  tree  or  a  potato  patch  to  keep  his  family  from  starving. — 
Those  who  are  thus  excluded  from  the  common  bounties  of  the  great 
Creator,  are  consequently  compelled  either  to  return  the  glorious  uift, 
of  life,  or  else  to  support  it  by  selling  their  strength  and  skill — their 
only  property — to  the  highest  bidder.  The  price  of  strength  and 
skill,  or  labor,  is  naturally  governed  by  the  relative  number  of  those 
who  are  struggling  to  sell,  and  those  who  wish  to  buy.  In  a  new 
country,  where  the  possessors  of  strength  and  skill  are  greatly  needed 
to  erect  mills  and  dwellings,  and  to  fit  the  wilderness  for  the  cultiva- 
tor of  the  ground,  they  enjoy  nearly  as  much  of  the  fruits  of  their 
labors  as  the  land  owner,  and  are  esteemed  according  to  their  virtues. 
But  the  forest  once  subdued,  their  services  become  less  needed,  while 
their  numbers  continually  increase ;  and  the  landowners,  no  longer 
eager  competitors  for  the  services  of  the  laborers,  are  surrounded, 
and  courted,  and  flattered,  by  miserable  competitors  for  servitude. 

"  The  strength  and  skill  of  the  surplus  poor  is  next  directed  to 
manufacturing  and  the  mechanic  arts ;  and  a  similar  round  is  tra- 
velled on  a  new  course.  It  is  not  long  since  an  expert  artizan  could 
earn  the  price  of  a  barrel  and  a  half  to  two  barrels  of  flour  per  week ; 
yet  now  we  see  before  us  only  the  prospect  of  being  slaves  so  long  as 
we  are  able  to  toil,  and  paupers  when  we  can  toil  no  more.  To  make 
matters  still  worse,  our  own  poor  are  forced  to  compete  in  every  way 
with  immense  numbers  of  foreign  poor,  who  have  severed  the  ties  of 
country  and  home,  hoping  to  acquire  here,  by  their  indiistry  and  skill, 
that  independence  which  their  industry  and  skill  could  never  buy  in 
the  land  of  their  fathers,  but  who  find  themselves  doomed  to  share 
and  to  augment  our  evils. 

"  But  there  is  another  great  cause  of  high  prices,  so  monstrous  in 
its  nature,  that  we  could  hardly  credit  its  existence,  were  it  not  con- 
tinually before  us  :  we  mean  the  curse  of  Paper  Money.  Gold  and 
silver  are  produced  from  the  earth  by  labor  ;  they  are  (or  ought  to  be) 
earned  from  the  producer  by  labor ;  and  the  man  who  has  earned  a 
portion  of  these  metals  by  honest  labor,  harms  no  one  by  selling  them 
for  labor  to  others.  No  man,  nor  combination,  can  by  Christian 
means  collect  a  sufficiency  of  these  metals  to  enable  him  to  engross 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  Ill 

the  food,  or  fuel,  or  houses  of  a  nation ;  but  a  leagued  band  of  paper- 
promise  coiners,  exert  absolute  control  over  the  whole  wealth  of  a 
country  !  They  can  print  off  the  nominal  value  of  our  whole  wheat 
crop  in  a  few  minutes  ;  and  as  they  draw  compound  interest  on  all 
the  DEBTS  they  owe,  the  more  they  owe,  the  greater  their  income,  and 
the  more  absolute  their  power. 

But  your  Committee  will  dwell  no  longer  on  the  causes  of  those 
evils  which  render  the  life  of  the  laborer  a  curse  to  be  borne,  instead 
of  a  good  to  be  enjoyed;  and  we  will  conclude  our  task  by  suggesting 
the  following  remedies,  which,  if  not  sudden,  will  prove  sure : 

First.  That  we  continually  combat  both  in  ourselves  and  others, 
that  ignorance  and  mental  laziness  which  has  so  long  rendered  the 
workingman  a  dupe  and  a  slave. 

Second.  That  we  cease  to  confer  political  power  on  speculators 
and  drones,  or  their  tools  and  confederates. 

Third.  That  in  order  to  put  an  end  to  the  banking  system,  and  the 
whole  power  of  false  capital,  we  so  alter  our  laws  as  to  render  all 
debts  hereafter  contracted,  simply  debts  of  honor,  and  thus  give  the 
advantages  of  credit  to  honest  industry,  instead  of  allowing  those  ad- 
vantages to  be  monopolized  by  these  best  skilled  in  grinding  the 
poor. 

John  H.  Hunt,  the  author  of  this  report,  is  one  of  the 
most  ultra  of  democrats  in  all  his  principles,  differing  in 
this  respect  from  all  his  kindred.  One  of  his  brothers  is 
at  this  time  member  of  Assembly  from  Alleghany  County, 
a  strong  Federal  Whig.  John  H.  Hunt  is,  besides,  the  au- 
thor of  several  able  productions  which  have  appeared  in 
print,  either  in  pamphlet  form,  or  in  the  newspapers,  and 
the  reader  is  referred  to  a  very  extraordinary  pamphlet 
from  his  pen  lately  published,  entitled  the  "  Slavery  of 
Poverty."  He  is  not  easily  excited  into  action,  but  is  not 
difficult  to  be  put  in  the  thinking  mood.  Unlike,  how- 
ever, the  greater  number  of  thinkers,  who  wish  to  express 
all  their  thoughts,  the  peculiarity  of  his  mind  is  to  concen- 
trate all  his  thinkings  into  some  abstract  which  shall  "  tell 
the  whole  story."  His  abilities  and  moral  worth  should 
place  him  in  the  front  rank  of  the  Democratic  party ;  but 
such  a  man  cannot  be  made  a  tool  of  by  those  who  get 
up  candidates  for  the  people,  i.  e.  the  pettifoggers  of 
politics. 

After  the  adoption  of  the  Report,  the  following  Reso- 
lutions were  read  and  adopted. 


112  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

"  Whereas  the  banking  system  of  the  states  of  the  Union,  and  more 
especially  the  safety  fund  bank  combination  of  the  State  of  New- 
York,  is  a  hydra-headed  monster,  preying  on  the  useful  classes  of  this 
community,  impoverishing  the  great  body  of  the  people,  defeating  the 
proper  exercise  of  their  rights  and  liberties,  subverting  the  Constitu- 
tion of  the  United  States,  and  the  vital  principles  of  Democratic  Re- 
publican government, 

Therefore,  We  declare  it  as  our  solemn  belief,  that  the  bank  oli- 
garchy is  the  worst  that  ever  existed  upon  the  face  of  the  earth ; 
because  it  is  founded  on  avarice,  the  basest  of  all  human  passions, 
and  the  one  of  all  others  that  has  the  least  regard  for  the  benign  pre- 
cepts of  religion,  or  the  happiness  of  the  human  race. 

That  banks  are,  in  fact,  legally  authorized  banditti,  levying  contri- 
butions and  indirect  taxation  from  every  honest  business,  filching 
from  the  industrious  the  fruits  of  their  labor,  and  making  the  rich 
richer  and  the  poor  poorer. 

"  That  they  have  wickedly  and  cruelly  encouraged  speculation, 
forestalling,  and  extortion,  in  such  articles  of  necessity  as  bread) 
meat,  rent,  and/weZ,  thereby  '  grinding  the  faces  of  the  poor.' 

"  That  they  emit '  bills  of  credit,'  called  bank  notes,  in  open  viola- 
tion of  the  letter  and  spirit  of  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States ; 
and  the  prerogative  of  regulating  the  currency  is  unconstitutionally 
and  capriciously  exercised  by  them,  through  the  means  of  expansions 
and  contractions. 

"  That  men  of  business  are  in  abject  vassalage  to  them,  for  '  the 
debtor  to  a  bank  is  a  slave  to  it ;'  and  that  our  virtuous  working 
people,  instead  of  thriving  by  their  honest  labor,  are,  year  after  year, 
sinking  deeper  into  poverty  and  bondage. 

"  That '  they  have  corrupted  that  class  of  society  from  which  our 
legislators  are  drawn ;'  for  our  governors,  legislators,  and  judges, 
are  bank  officers,  and  indebted  or  interested  in  those  institutions ; 
and  therefore  they  no  longer  hearken  to  the  voice  of  the  people. 

"  That  their  influence  over  the  public  press  is  dangerous  to  the 
spirit  of  liberty,  for  the  power  of  the  purse  and  the  press  is  so  clearly 
in  their  hands,  that  the  language  cf  political  truth  and  public-spirited 
independence  is  stifled  and  suppressed,  if  adverse  to  the  interests  of 
the  bank  oligarchy ! 

"  That  the  effect  of  banks  on  the  community  is  to  create  the  neces- 
sity for  alms-houses  and  state  prisons ;  to  make  business  men  gam- 
blers, bankrupts,  knaves,  or  vassals,  and  working  people  slaves, 
paupers,  or  felons. 

"  That  the  substitution  of  bank  notes  in  the  place  of  specie,  has 
raised  the  nominal  prices  of  all  things  so  high,  that  European  nations, 
notwithstanding  the  oppressive  taxation  they  labor  under,  can  bring 
their  goods  across  the  Atlantic,  and  undersell  us  in  our  own  markets. 

"  That  in  consequence  of  this,  most  branches  of  industry  are  not 
sufficiently  remunerated — the  nation  is  made  dependent  on  foreign 
manufacturers,  and  the  growth  and  prosperity  of  this  country  mate- 
rially checked. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  113 

"  Therefore,  Resolved,  That  it  is  the  duty  of  every  philanthropist, 
of  every  patriot,  and  of  every  moral  man,  to  exert  his  veto  against 
paper  money,  that  stupendous  fraud,  the  bitter  fountain  of  an  incal- 
culable amount  of  political,  moral,  and  social  evil." 

And  again  were  the  people  called  on  to  go  to  the  Banks 
and  demand  specie  for  their  notes. 

"  Resolved,  That  the  «  People's  VETO '  is  to  demand  of  the  banks 
gold  and  silver  for  their  ( promises  to  pay,3  and  thus  make  these  soul- 
less corporate  extortioners  pay  tlieir  debts  to  the  people  as  promptly  as 
they  compel  payment  from  the  people." 

This  immense  meeting  conducted  itself  with  perfect 
order  and  decorum,  and  on  its  adjournment  quietly  dis- 
persed. 

On  the  same  evening,  at  a  public  meeting  at  the  Mili- 
tary and  Civic  Hotel,  the  Loco-Focos  passed  indignant 
Resolutions  against  the  public  authorities  for  "  anticipating 
a  riot  and  disgracing  our  citizen  soldiers  by  placing  them 
in  the  situation  of  policemen,  and  keeping  them  under 
arms  to  intimidate  their  fellow  citizens  assembled  in  the 
Park  for  a  redress  of  grievances." 

"  Resolved,  That  we,  the  Equal  Rights  party,  citizens  of  this  Re- 
public, will  hold  another  public  meeting  in  the  Park,  on  the  first 
Monday  in  April  next,  in  order  to  ascertain  whether  or  not  this  com- 
munity is  under  martial  law." 

The  following  resolution  was  also  unanimously  adopted : 

"  Resolved,  That  we  have  implicit  confidence  and  faith  in  the  in- 
tegrity of  Robert  Townsend,  Jr.,  and  Clinton  Roosevelt,  and  while  we 
award  to  them  the  meed  of  praise  for  their  adherence  to  our  princi- 
ples, we  cannot  refrain  from  passing  our  unanimous  censure  upon 
the  conduct  of  G.  W.  Patterson,  member  of  Assembly  from  Living- 
ston county,  whose  whole  course  has  been  in  opposition  to  the  friends 
of  Equal  Rights." 

The  ensuing  chapter  will  show  the  bearing  of  this  lat- 
ter resolution. 


10' 


CHAPTER    IX. 


Memorial  to  the  Assembly  in  relation  to  the  selection  of  the  Bank 
Investigating  Committee — Ungenerous  suspicions  of  the  House 
respecting  Mr.  Roosevelt — A  Committee  to  investigate  the  Memo- 
rialists appointed — M.  Jaques  and  Levi  D.  Slamm  summoned,  but 
they  require  their  expenses  to  be  paid — Sergeant-at-Arms  despatch- 
ed to  arrest  them — They  are  arraigned  for  contempt  of  the  House 
— Proceedings  and  Reprimand — Arraigned  again  for  a  second  con- 
tempt— Messrs.  Jaques'  and  Slamm's  Protest — Proceedings — Pro- 
found Resolution  of  Mr.  King — Slamm  conforms  and  is  discharged 
from  custody — Jaques  alone  at  the  bar,  addresses  the  House,  and 
gives  it  a  constitutional  reprimand — End  of  the  affair,  with  remarks 
on  the  meanness  of  the  House  of  Assembly. 

"  What  is  the  matter  ?  Horrible ! 
Have  you  not  heard  nor  dreamt  ? 

The  House— the  House  at  Albany 
Is  treated  with  contempt !" 

SOON  after  the  commencement  of  the  Session  of  the 
Legislature,  in  January,  1837,  Mr.  Roosevelt,  one  of  the 
two  Loco-Foco  members  of  Assembly  from  the  city  of 
New- York,  moved  for  the  "  appointment  of  a  special 
committee,  with  power,  &c.  to  inquire  into  certain  usuri- 
ous practices  charged  against  the  banks  of  this  State." 
This  motion  was  unanimously  adopted,  but  second 
thoughts  pointed  out  the  impolicy,  if  not  danger,  of  suffer- 
ing a  known  enemy  of  the  banking  system  to  take  the 
lead  in  such  an  important  matter,  to  be  its  chairman 
according  to  parliamentary  usage ;  one  who  would  thor- 
oughly investigate  the  banks  and  bring  in  a  Loco-Foco 
Report  to  shed  light  to  the  whole  people  would  never  do. 
Therefore,  when  he  subsequently  called  up  the  motion  for 
specific  action,  it  was  laid  on  the  table  at  the  instance  of 
Mr.  King. 

But  this  mode  of  disposing  of  the  subject  was  calcu- 
lated to  confirm  suspicions  respecting  the  "  institutions  to 
which  we  were  indebted  for  all  our  unexampled  prosper- 
ity," and  to  shake  that  public  confidence  without  which 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  115 

they  could  not  exist.  Mr.  Cutting,  in  two  or  three  weeks 
afterwards,  submitted  resolutions  to  the  same  effect  as  Mr. 
Roosevelt's,  but  sufficiently  verbose  to  make  a  great  pa- 
rade. These  were  adopted,  and  the  investigating  com- 
mittee appointed  by  the  speaker,  with  Thomas  G.  Tal- 
mage,  a  director  of  the  Lafayette  Bank,  for  chairman, 
which  turned  out  to  be  as  intended,  one  of  the  veriest 
bank  white-washing  committees  that  ever  was  chosen. 

"  The  Equal  Rights  Party,  strongly  partaking  in  the 
general  indignation  at  what  they  thought  was  legislative 
chicanery,"  sent  the  following  memorial  "to  the  Speaker 
and  members  of  Assembly." 

"  Your  memorialists,  inhabitants  of  the  city  of  New- York,  respect- 
fully present  the  following  remonstrance  to  your  honorable  body, 
on  the  subject  of  the  appointment  of  the  members  of  the  Bank  Inves- 
tigating Committee. 

"  They,  with  others  of  your  constituents,  in  all  parts  of  the  State, 
are  of  opinion  that  the  duties  of  the  said  committee  are  such  as  indis- 
pensably require  men  of  capability  and  independence,  equally  as  re- 
gards Banks,  their  direct  power,  or  indirect  influence. 

"  Your  memorialists  earnestly  but  with  due  deference  to  your  hon- 
orable body,  express  their  great  dissatisfaction  at  the  appointment  of 
any  bank  officer  as  chairman,  or  of  any  man  interested,  connected  or 
indebted  to  banking  institutions,  as  a  member  of  said  committee ;  and 
whether  such  appointments  proceeded  from  good  or  evil  design,  the 
result  will  be  the  same  to  the  banks  and  the  people,  to  render  the  in- 
vestigation totally  nugatory,  a  thing  full  of  sound,  but  in  reality  sig- 
nifying nothing. 

"Besides,  there  is  a  member  of  your  honorable  body  to  whom  just- 
ice has  not  been  done  in  this  matter.  Mr.  Roosevelt  was  the 
original  mover  for  this  investigation,  and  by  parliamentary  usage,  by 
propriety  and  by  courtesy,  should  have  been  placed  on  the  committee, 
more  especially  as  it  does  not  appear  that  he  attempted  to  influence 
the  speaker,  either  privately  or  publicly.  Great,  however,  as  the 
injustice  is  to  him,  it  is  still  infinitely  greater  to  his  constituents,  and 
to  the  whole  people  of  the  State. 

"  We,  therefore,  your  fellow  citizens,  deferentially  and  as  we  think 
justly  remonstrate  against  the  appointments  which  have  been  made 
of  the  members  of  this  Committee.  When  we  recollect  the  prediction 
of  a  committee  of  the  legislature  of  1818  that  <  Members  of  Assembly 
will  be  indebted  to  the  Banks  for  their  Seats  in  the  Capitol,'  we  feel 
it  our  duty  to  ask  for  an  efficient  disinterested  independent  Com- 
mittee. When  we  call  to  mind  the  words  of  Jefferson  in  relation  to 
the  principles  of  the  Bank  aristocracy, — '  that  they  are  unyielded 
and  unyielding,  that  they  have  taken  deep  root  in  the  hearts  of  that 


116  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

class  from  which  our  legislators  are  drawn,'  we  the  undersigned  de- 
clare the  necessity  for  searching  vigilance  and  republican  jealousy  as 
respects  Banking  institutions,  and  therefore  we  again  ask  of  your 
honorable  body  an  efficient  disinterested  independent  investigating 
Committee  in  order  that  justice  may  be  done  to  your  Constituents, 
the  people." 

Soon  after  the  presentation  of  this  memorial  the  suspi- 
cions of  some  of  the  members  were  excited  as  to  a  por- 
tion of  the  signatures  on  a  piece  of  paper  attached  to  the 
bottom  of  the  memorial.  These  high-minded  legislators 
suspected  that,  as  they  had  acted  meanly  towards  Mr. 
Roosevelt,  he  on  his  part  had  the  meanness  not  only 
to  be  author  of  the  memorial  himself,  but  that  he  had 
also  cut  off  the  piece  of  paper  mentioned  from  some  other 
document  and  attached  it  to  this  one.  The  names  of 
James  Kent  and  William  J.  Bayard  were  on  this  piece, 
the  first  a  paver,  the  latter  a  carpenter.  How  could 
legislators,  admirers  of  Chancellor  Kent,  conceive  of  any 
other  James  Kent  in  the  world  ?  How  could  it  be  sup- 
posed that  the  name  of  an  eminent  merchant  deceased 
could  have  been  affixed  fairly  to  such  a  memorial  ? 

This  was  a  tremendously  dark  and  mysterious  matter, 
and  it  must  be  investigated.  Accordingly  a  special  com- 
mittee was  chosen,  consisting  of  Hon.  G.  W.  Patterson, 
the  Hon.  Mr.  Westlake,  and  the  Hon.  Thomas  W. 
Tucker,  with  powers  to  send  for  persons  and  papers. 

With  all  despatch  possible, "  the  select  committee, 
through  the  Sheriff  of  the  County  of  New  York,  served 
on  Moses  Jaques  and  Levi  D.  Slamm,  two  of  the  signers 
of  the  petition,  a  summons  to  appear  before  the  commit- 
tee on  the  25th  of  February,  at  the  capitol  in  the  city  of 
Albany,  to  testify  what  they  knew  relative  to  the  pe- 
tition." 

Messrs.  Jaques  and  Slamm  sent  the  following  reply  to 
G.  W.  Patterson,  the  chairman. 

NEW  YORK,  Feb.,  1837. 

Sir — We  have  received  a  summons  signed  by  you  to  appear  at  the 
capitol  in  the  city  of  Albany  on  the  25th  February  to  testify  what  we 
know  relative  to  that  petition. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  117 

It  would  afford  us  particular  gratification  to  attend  agreeably  to 
the  summons,  but  we  must  first  be  provided  with  the  means  to  defray 
the  expense  of  our  journeying  to  and  from  Albany  and  while  there. 
As  soon  as  we  are  thus  provided,  we  will  attend. 
Yours  respectfully, 

M.  JAQUES,  LEVI  D.  SLAMM. 

The  special  committee  reported  to  the  House,  and 
Messrs.  Jaques  and  Slamm  were  pronounced  guilty  of  a 
wilful  contempt  of  the  House  of  Assembly.  The  Ser- 
geant at  Arms  was  instantly  despatched  with  a  war- 
rant to  arrest  them.  They  were  taken  prisoners  to  Al- 
bany, and  on  Monday,  the  6th  of  March,  they  were  ar- 
raigned at  the  bar  of  the  House. 

After  some  debate  on  a  resolution  by  Mr.  Hackley  to 
appoint  a  select  committee  to  conduct  further  proceedings, 
the  speaker  appointed  Messrs.  Hackley,  Ogden  and  Van 
Tuyl.  This  committee  sat  and  incubated  the  following 
interrogatories,  to  be  put  to  the  prisoners. 

1st.  "Were  yousubpo2ned  to  be  and  appear  before  the  Committee 
of  the  House  to  whom  was  referred  the  petition  of  M.  Jaques  and 
others,  and  if  so,  did  you  attend  in  obedience  to  the  exigency  of  said 
subpoena  ? 

2d.  Did  you  ask  the  advice  of  counsel  in  relation  to  it,  and  if  so, 
who  was  such  counsel,  and  what  advice  did  he  give  you  ? 

3d.  What  reasons  can  you  assign  for  not  complying  with'said  sub- 
poena ?  If  any,  state  the  same  particularly  ?" 

M.  Jaques  requested  copies  of  the  questions,  that  he 
might  have  leave  to  answer  them  in  writing.  He  was 
not  disposed  to  do  or  say  anything  to  compromit  the 
rights  or  interests  of  himself  or  others,  and  he  wished  to 
proceed  with  due  caution.  His  request  was  granted. 

On  the  7th  they  were  again  brought  before  the  House. 
Again  there  was  more  debate  on  this  weighty  matter  of 
state.  The  speaker  at  length  put  the  questions  to  the 
prisoners,  who  stated  they  'were  willing  to  waive  their 
objections  and  answer  the  interrogatories. 

M.  Jaques,  in  reply  to  the  first,  said  that  "  he  had  re- 
ceived the  subpffina,  but  did  not  attend." 


118  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

To  the  second, — "  he  did  not  perceive  that  it  had  any 
relevancy  to  the  matter  at  issue.  However,  he  did  not 
consult  counsel,  nor  did  he  require  to  be  informed  that 
he  was  bound  by  the  law  of  the  land  when  consti- 
tutional." 

To  the  third, — he  adduced  the  letter  already  presented 
to  the  reader.  To  this  he  added,  "  that  he  was  still  under 
the  impression  that  in  all  cases  where  the  attendance  of 
witnesses  is  required  to  travel  beyond  the  limits- of  the 
county  in  which  they  reside,  the  party  requiring  such 
attendance  is  obliged  to  defray  the  expenses. 

"  That  by  the  rules  and  regulations  of  the  House  of 
Representatives  of  the  United  States,  it  is  necessary  that 
all  writs,  warrants,  and  subpoenas  issued  by  order  of  the 
House,  should  be  under  the  hand  and  seal  of  the  speaker, 
and  attested  by  the  clerk. 

"  That  the  subpoena  served  upon  him  was  signed  by  the 
Chairman  of  the  committee,  and  as  he  knew  not  of  any  rule 
of  this  house  differing  from  the  above,  his  honest  convic- 
tions were  that  it  was  irregular,  and  therefore  he  was  not 
bound  to  obey  it. 

"  That  the  frequent  encroachments  upon  the  constitu- 
tional rights  of  the  people,  by  party  legislation  and  a  re- 
currence to  British  precedents,  have  awakened  a  neces- 
sary and  laudable  jealousy  at  the  least  appearance  of  fur- 
ther invasions  of  their  rights  and  liberties.  Therefore,  in 
order  that  no  act  or  precedent  whereby  his  own,  or  the 
rights  and  liberties  of  others  may  be  affected,  he  most 
respectfully  requested  that  the  house  furnish  the  constitu- 
tional authority,  if  any  there  be,  by  which  it  is  clothed 
with  power  to  issue  its  warrants  commanding  the  ser- 
geant at  arms  (he  not  being  a  ministerial  officer  of  any 
court)  to  arrest  private  citizens  and  take  them  forcibly 
from  their  homes,  their  families  and  their  business,  at  any 
time,  and  under  any  circumstances,  and  arraign  them  at 
the  bar  of  this  house  to  answer  for  offences,  in  his 
humble  belief  unknown  to  the  constitution  of  the  United 
States,  or  of  this  state,  but  in  derogation  of  both." 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  119 

Levi  D.  Slamm  took  the  same  ground,  in  his  answer, 
but  with  a  little  admixture  of  domestic  sentiment. 

Mr.  Hackley  offered  a  resolution  that  Messrs.  Jaques 
and  Slamm  had  been  guilty  of  a  wilful  contempt  of  the 
authority  of  the  house  ("  the  honor  and  dignity  of  which," 
in  the  words  of  Thomas  W.  Tucker  "  must  not  be  com- 
promitted"),  and  that  they  be  brought  to  the  bar  of  the 
house  and  be  reprimanded  by  the  speaker. 

And  hereupon  a  sensible  debate  took  place  among  these 
sage  legislators.  The  criminals  were  desired  to  rise,  and 
then  the  speaker  performed  that  farcical  ceremony  called 
the 

REPRIMAND. 

"  It  is  with  .painful  emotion  that  I  proceed  in  the  discharge  of  the 
duties  of  the  Chair,  to  convey  to  you  both,  the  censure  so  clearly  in- 
dicated by  the  resolution  which  has  been  this  instant  adopted  by  this 
House.  By  your  own  confessions,  you  have  been  convicted,  in  the 
judgment  of  this  House,  of  a  wilful  contempt  of  its  authority,  in  re- 
fusing to  obey  the  MANDATE  issued  by  a  select  committee  of  its 
members,  in  the  regular  and  legal  discharge  of  the  duties  imposed  on 
them  by  a  deliberate  vote  of  this  body.  As  a  part  of  the  law-making 
power,  the  Assembly  justly  view  with  jealousy  any  attempt  to  evade 
or  violate  the  supremacy  of  those  laws  which  they,  in  an  especial 
manner,  are  now  called  upon  to  assert  and  enforce.  That  you  were 
bound  to  obey  the  injunction  of  the  subpO3nas  served  on  you  respect- 
ively, there  cannot  be  a  doubt ;  and  to  suffer  the  disobedience  of 
which  you  have  both  been  convicted  to  go  unpunished,  would,  in  a 
land  of  laws,  have  been  productive  of  incalculable  evil ;  particularly 
as  one  of  you  (I  allude  to  Mr.  Jaques)  appears  to  be  advanced  in 
years,  and,  from  what  has  been  said  on  this  floor,  has  not  only  en- 
joyed the  advantage  of  having  been  well  educated,  but  has  a  large 
stake  in  the  maintenance  of  law  and  order ;  and  because  you,  Mr. 
Slamm,  though  younger  in  years,  have  exhibited  before  this  House 
prooT  of  intellectual  endowment,  which  cannot  fail  to  gain  for  your 
opinions  and  conduct  an  influence  which  they  would  not  otherwise 
carry  with  them.  These  circumstances,  while  they  aggravate  the 
force  of  bad  example,  at  the  same  time  leave  you  without  excuse  or 
apology  for  refusing  obedience  to  the  requisitions  of  the  law,  of  which 
every  citizen  is  presumed  to  be,  and  of  which  you  doubtless  were, 
apprised.  In  compliance  with  the  order  of  the  House,  it  devolves  on 
me  to  reprimand  you  both  for  disobedience  to  the  well  known  laws 
of  the  State,  upon  the  strict  enforcement  of  which  so  much  depends, 
and  for  the  contempt  of  the  House,  which  has  been  so  clearly  proved 
against  both  of  you.  I  do,  therefore,  in  virtue  of  the  authority  of  the 
House  of  Assembly,  and  in  its  name,  reprimand  you  for  your  con- 


120  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

duct ;  and  I  trust  that  this  just  exposure  and  admonition  may  prove 
a  useful  lesson  to  you,  and  all  others,  from  a  like  attempt  to  set  at 
defiance  the  laws  of  your  country. 

"  At  fifteen  minutes  before  three  o'clock,  the  House,  pending  a 
motion  by  Mr.  Patterson  directing  the  Select  Committee  to  proceed 
to  summon  Messrs.  Jaques  and  Slamm,  adjourned. 

Thus  ended  the  trial  for  the  first  contempt !  during  which  the  As- 
sembly assumed  powers  not  delegated  by  the  constitution,  but  ex- 
pressly prohibited  by  that  sacred  instrument,  which  the  members  had 
sworn  to  support." 

But  the  farce  did  not  end  here,  for  the  memorial  had 
yet  to  be  investigated ;  and  Mr.  Roosevelt's  participation 
in  it  had  yet  to  be  developed.  The  house  had  satisfied 
its  honorjand  dignity,  and  now  its  suspicions  must  be  satis- 
fied. Messrs.  Jaques  and  Slamm  were  quickly  summoned 
before  "  the  select  committee  of  which  G.  W.  Patterson 
•was  chairman"  to  testify  in  relation  to  the  suspected 
petition. 

Messrs.  Jaques  and  Slamm  appeared  before  the  com- 
mittee, but  they  refused  to  testify  except  on  certain  con- 
ditions namely,  that  the  committee  insert  in  their  minutes 
a  PROTEST  containing  the  opinions  of  Messrs.  Jaques  and 
Slamm  in  regard  to  the  unconstitutionality  of  the  whole 
proceeding  on  the  part  of  the  house — a  DISCLAIMER  of  the 
right  or  authority  of  the  legislature  to  act  in  the  pre- 
mises, and  that  their  evidence  shall  be  taken  with  the  full 
understanding  that  it  is  given  voluntarily. 

The  Committee  was  perplexed.  Was  there  not  some- 
thing even  more  than  was  suspected,  under  all  this  stub- 
bornness ?  It  was  too  momentous  a  matter  for  the  com- 
mittee ;  it  must  go  to  the  collected  wisdom  of  the  house. 
The  protest  was  refused  insertion  on  the  minutes,  and 
Messrs.  Jaques  and  Slamm  declined  being  sworn. 

The  special  committee  hastened  to  the  house  with  its 
report  of  this  second  instance  of  contempt.  The  Honor- 
able Mr.  Westlake  was  for  confining  the  stubborn  men  in 
the  county  jail  during  the  session.  The  Honorable  Mr. 
Cutting  expressed  doubts  as  to  the  power  of  the  legisla- 
ture in  cases  of  contempt.  The  Honorable  Mr.  Van 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  121 

Tuyl  presented  a  petition  from  citizens  of  Albany  and 
Troy  asking  that  further  proceedings  in  the  case  of  Ja- 
ques  and  Slamm  be  stayed  until  the  Judiciary  Committee 
have  time  to  report  whether  the  house  had  acted  consti- 
tutionally or  not.  Mr.  Cutting  of  the  Judiciary  Com- 
mittee reported  in  part  by  recommending  that  further 
proceedings  be  suspended.  Mr.  Porter  inquired  if  all  the 
members  of  the  committee  had  been  consulted.  Mr. 
Cutting  replied  that  he  had  forgotten  that  the  gentleman 
had  returned.  Mr.  Patterson  moved  that  the  committee 
be  not  discharged  from  the  main  inquiry.  Mr.  King  was 
opposed  to  any  reference  whatever.  The  motion  to  refer 
was  lost. 

But  the  house  wanted  to  know  all  that  Messrs.  Jaques 
and  Slamm  knew  of  the  suspected  petition,  and  at  length 
Mr.  Hackley's  resolution  was  adopted — "  That  M.  Jaques 
and  Levi  D.  Slamm  ba  brought  to  the  bar,  and  that  the 
Speaker  inquire  of  them  if  they  have  anything  to  offer 
in  relation  to  their  alleged  refusal  to  be  sworn,  &c.,  before 
the  committee." 

The  speaker  having  put  this  inquiry,  M.  Jaques,  on  be- 
half of  himself  and  Mr.  Slamm,  answered  as  follows : 

"  That  nothing  but  the  importance  which  both  attached 
to  the  question  before  the  house  could  have  induced  him 
for  the  first  time  in  his  life  to  present  himself  before  a 
public  assembly  in  vindication  of  the  stand  they  had 
taken  in  behalf  of  the  violated  constitution  of  their  coun- 
try— that  they  believed  the  law  under  which  the  house  had 
instituted  these  proceedings  was  contrary  to  the  constitu- 
tions of  the  United  States  and  of  the  state  of  New  York — 
that  they  had  no  legal  advisers  and  asked  none,  believing 
that  the  legal  characters  of  the  country,  from  education, 
habits  of  thinking  and  association,  were  too  strongly  wed- 
ded to  precedents  of  government  and  law  which  were 
anti-democratic  and  repugnant  to  the  spirit  of  free  govern- 
ment— that  though  we  had  separated  ourselves  from  Brit- 
ish government,  we  were  still  slaves  to  their  laws,  their 
customs,  their  parliamentary  proceedings,  and  that  it  was 
11 


122  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

high  time  our  second  independence  was  declared.  Better 
that  we  take  the  advice  of  that  able  jurist,  Edward  Liv- 
ingston, and  reject  all  British  statutes  and  British  prece- 
dents from  our  courts  of  law  as  evidences  of  law.  As 
well  might  we  adopt  the  code  of  Napoleon,  or  the  civil 
code  of  Russia,  as  a  guide  for  our  judicial  decisions  or 
legislative  proceedings;  they  are  all  based  on  monarchical 
principles,  and  incompatible  with  free  government." 

Mr.  Slamm,at  the  instance  of  Mr.  Jaques,  then,  read  to 
the  house,  the  document  offered  to  the  select  committee. 

PROTEST. 
To  the  Select  Committee  of  the  House  of  Assembly  on  the  Petition  of 

M.  Jaques  and  others. 

GENTLEMEN  : — We  appear  before  you  at  this  lime,  not  because  we 
acknowledge  your  right  or  authority  to  call  on  us  to  appear  and  tes- 
tify, but  for  the  purpose  of  assigning  our  reasons  for  not  replying  to 
the  interrogatories  you  may  submit.  At  the  same  time  we  would 
have  you  understand,  that  we  have  nothing  to  conceal,  which,  if  dis- 
closed, would  iu  the  least  affect  ourselves,  or  any  other  person  whose 
name  may  be  on  the  petition  in  question,  or  any  persons  with  whom 
we  are  acquainted. 

We  cannot  consent  to  be  examined  by  you  as  a  committee,  because 
we  deny  its  authority  ;  and  to  yield  now,  would  be  virtually  acknow- 
ledging the  constitutionality  of  the  law  of  this  state  under  which  the 
Legislature  appear  to  claim  the  power, to  issue  its  warrant,  command- 
inur  ii:s  .--•!  _(  aut-ai-;uihs,  (he  not  being  a  ministerial  officer  of  any 
court  of  law),  to  arrest  private  citizens,  detain  them  as  prisoners,  and 
arraign  them  at  the  bar  of  the  House  of  Assembly,  and  then  con- 
demn, and  censure  or  imprison  them,  at  their  pleasure  :  thus  break- 
ing down  the  barriers  of  our  constitution  by  uniting  the  three  distinct 
departments  of  the  government — the  legislative,  the  judicial,  and  the 
executive,  into  one;  thereby  setting  up  an  OLIGARCHY  of  a  most 
dangerous  character,  and  totally  subversive  of  all  free  governments 
— against  all  which  we  do  most  solemnly  PROTEST.  And,  further- 
more : 

To  admit,  for  argument  sake,  that  this  committee  has  the  right  to 
call  us  before  it,  yet  we  are  not  bound  to  answer  any  questions 
whereby  we  might  implicate  ourselves  :  this  is  a  rule  of  law  which  we 
presume  this  committee  will  not  deny. 

That  no  evil  impression  may  be  inferred  from  the  position  we  have 
taken,  and  that  the  good  people  of  this  state  may  discover  that  we 
only  persist  in  our  constitutional  rights,  we  respectfully  inform  you, 
that  we  are  willing  to  be  sworn  and  testify  before  you  appertaining  to 
the  petition  in  question,  but  with  a  full  understanding  that  we  do  it 
voluntarily,  and  that  this  protest  be  considered  part  oT  the  minutes  of 
your  proceedings.  M.  JAQUES, 

Albany,  March  8,  1837.  LEVI  D.  SLAMM, 


1837.]  LOCOFOCO  PARTY.  123 

After  Mr.  Slamm  had  concluded,  Mr.  Jaques  was  going 
on  to  argue  the  constitutional  question,  when 

Mr.  King  interposed,  asking  whether  it  was  worth  while 
to  listen  to  a  constitutional  argument,  so  long  as  the  per- 
sons at  the  bar  expressed  a  willingness  to  go  before  the 
committee  voluntarily  and  be  sworn. 

The  Speaker  said  he  understood  that  the  persons  at  the 
bar  refused  to  be_sworn,  and  put  the  question  to  Mr.  Jaques, 
whether  he  meant  to  be  understood  to  say  in  the  written 
paper  just  presented,  that  he  was  willing  to  go  before  the 
committee  and  be  sworn  ? 

Mr.  Jaques  replied  :  under  the  conditions  stated  in  the 
paper. 

Mr.  King  asked  that  the  paper  might  be  read  again, 
and  it  was  read  by  the  clerk. 

The  Speaker  again  put  the  question  stated  above,  and 

Mr.  Jaques  replied  in  the  affirmative,  on  condition  that 
the  paper  be  recorded  on  the  minutes  of  the  house,  as 
part  of  its  proceedings. 

The  Speaker  said  it  would  be  so  recorded  of  course. 

Mr.  King  then  moved  that  Messrs.  Jaques  and  Slamm 
be  discharged  from  custody. 

Mr.  T.  W.  Tucker  opposed  the  motion,  saying  that  he 
never  could  consent  to  compromise  what  he  conceived  to 
be  the  just  authority  of  the  House,  under  any  such  stipu- 
lation or  bargain  as  that  proposed  by  the  persons  at  the 
bar.  The  honor  and  dignity  of  the  House  must  not  be 
compromitted  ! 

Mr.  Hurlbert  was  also  opposed  to  the  motion.  It  was 
debated  by  Messrs.  King  and  Westlake. 

Mr.  Bradish  offered  a  resolution  to  wait  for  the  report 
of  the  judiciary  committee. 

Mr.  Porter  moved  that  the  resolution  lay  on  the  table. 

Mr.  King  withdrew  his  first  resolution  to  offer  another, 
viz.  :  "  That  this  house  possesses  the  legal  and  constitu- 
tional power  to  punish  for  contempt  of  its>  authority." 

This  short  mode  of  getting  above  the  constitution  was 
adopted  unanimously.  Legislative  bodies  are  always 


. 


H1STOKY  OF  THL  [1837. 

prone  to  usurp  power,  because  there  is  no  personal  res- 
ponsibility. Our  legislative  history  abounds  with  instan- 
ces of  usurpation. 

All  difficulties  being  thus  got  over  by  the  House  voting 
itself  absolute,  Mr.  King  renewed  his  former  motion,  to 
discharge  Messrs.  Jaques  and  Slamm  from  custody.  This 
was  debated  by  Messrs  Van  Tuyl,  Zabriskie,  Bigelow, 
Roosevelt,  Patterson,  King,  Westlake,  Taylor  and  Rug- 
gles,  when  the  question  was  taken  and  lost. 

Next  day  the  House  got  into  the  matter  again.  Mr. 
Sibley  offered  a  resolution  that  the  Speaker  propound  to 
Messrs.  Jaques  and  Slamm  the  question,  "  Are  you  will- 
ing to  testify  before  the  committee,  but  not  to  answer  any 
question  which  may  criminate  yourselves  1 "  This  was 
adopted. 

The  Speaker  put  the  question  to  M.  Jaques,  who  said 
he  was  sorry  the  resolution  had  been  adopted,  as  he  in- 
dulged the  hope — the  Speaker  interposed  for  a  direct 
tmswer. 

Mr.  Jaques  then  replied,  "  I  must  say  NO  !  because  I 
wish  to  be  heard." 

The  Speaker  put  the  same  question  to  Mr.  Slamm,  who 
replied  as  follows : 

"  That  inasmuch  as  the  House  of  Assembly  bad  granted 
his  request,  by  placing  upon  its  journals  his  Protest  against 
the  constitutionality  of  the  whole  procedure,  he,  as  he 
had  stated  in  that  Protest,  was  willing  to  testify  before 
the  committee." 

The  Speaker  then  stated  that  the  House  desired  an  un- 
qualified answer.  The  question  was  again  put  to  him 
and  he  replied  as  above. 

Mr.  Cutting  moved  that  Mr.  Slamm  be  discharged 
from  the  custody  of  the  House,  which  was  carried  by  a 
vote  of  92  yeas  to  7  nays. 

Mr.  Burroughs  renewed  his  resolution  so  amended  as 
to  commit  M.  Jaques  to  the  county  jail  of  Albany  until 
he  shall  submit  to  an  examination  before  the  committee. 

M.  Jaques  then  proceeded  with  his  remarks. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  125 

"  I  hope,"  said  he,  "  Mr.  Speaker,  to  be  indulged  in  a  few  remarks 
explanatury  of  our  motives,  and  in  vindication  of  our  characters,  be- 
fore I  proceed  to  the  consideration  of  the  main  question  at  issue. 

We  are  charged  with  acting  for  political  effect.  This  we  deny. 
Our  motive  is  a  desire  to  protect  ourselves  and  our  fellow-citizens 
from  oppression.  If  the  house  of  Assembly  had  given  us  a  full  and 
fair  hearing  in  the  first  instance,  we  should  have  been  satisfied ;  but 
our  requests  were  unattended  to,  and  we  were  condemned  and  sen- 
tenced in  one  breath.  Feeling  ourselves  shut  out  from  an  opportu- 
nity of  defending  our  rights  and  opinions,  we  took  measures  to  place 
ourselves  again  in  the  power  of  the  House,  and  abide  the  result. 

Our  characters,  our  motives,  and  our  principles,  are  assailed; 
every  epithet  of  reproach  and  contumely  that  the  English  language 
can  furnish,  is  heaped  upon  us.  It  is  said  that  we  are  ambitious ; 
that  we  do  not  regard  the  property  or  rights  of  others  ;  that  we  incite 
to  mobs ;  that  our  principles  are  corrupt,  &c.  Such  has  been  the 
fate  of  all  reformers,  in  all  ages,  and  in  all  countries.  The  first  and 
greatest  reformer  that  history  gives  us  much  account  of,  was  reviled 
and  evil  spoken  of :  he  was  called  a  thief,  a  vagabond,  a  disturber 
of  the  peace,  of  society,  a  babbler  :  they  charged  that  he  was  an  asso- 
ciate of  publicans  and  sinners ;  that  he  was  a  madman ;  that  he 
taught  doctrines  which  were  loosening  all  the  bonds  of  society,  and  turn- 
ing the  world  upside  down  :  and  for  his  firmness  in  resisting  the  op- 
pressions of  the  money-changers,  the  Pharisees  and  the  Regency  of 
that  day,  he  was  persecuted  to  death.  A  period  of  eighteen  hundred 
years  has  since  elapsed,  and  what  is  the  result  ?  To  condemn  his 
morality,  or  doubt  his  divinity,  is  deemed  INFIDELITY  ! 

Our  principles  have  long  since  been  before  the  public,  and  we  call  on 
our  opponents  to  gainsay  them.*  They  are  drawn  from  the  true 
sources  of  wisdom,  and  are  founded  on  the  eternal  principles  of  truth, 
and  will  endure  to  the  end  of  time. 

I  wish  here  to  correct  some  erroneous  opinions  which  I  have  heard 
expressed  on  this  floor  and  elsewhere  by  honorable  members  of  the 
House. 

They  are  as  follows  :  That  members  of  the  Senate  and  Assembly 
possess  all  the  powers  of  the  people ;  that  in  fact  they  are  the  peo- 
ple ;  that  all  laws  passed  by  a  majority  of  both  branches  of  the 
Legislature,  and  approved  by  the  Governor,  however  contrary  to  our 
written  constitutions,  are  binding  on  the  people ;  and  are  in  fact 
constitutional — the  Legislature  being  the  people,  and  of  course  above 
the  Constitution. 

Such  is  the  doctrine  promulgated  by  men  who  claim  to  be  the  ex- 
clusive supporters  of  democratic  government !  It  is  the  theory  and 
practice  of  the  British  government,  "  The  King  can  do  no  wrong." 
Gentlemen  had  better  have  our  constitutions  burnt  by  the  common 


See  Declaration  of  Equal  Rights  Party, 
11* 


126  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

hangman  at  once.  But  I  would  ask,  for  what  purpose  the  honorable 
members  take  the  oath  to  support  the  Constitution  of  the  United 
States,  and  of  this  State,  when  they  take  their  seats  in  this  House? 
And  why  they  propose  amendments,  in  order  to  enable  them  to  obtain 
the  consent  of  the  people  to  effect  some  object  not  allowed  by  the 
Constitution  ?  An  amendment  on  the  subject  of  the  duties  on  salt, 
and  the  sales  at  auction,  were  not  long  since  made,  and  it  is  now  pro- 
posed to  amend  so  as  to  sanction  some  changes  in  our  judiciary.  If 
the  Legislature  be  the  people,  why  not  alter  the  Constitution  at  once, 
and  save  the  trouble  and  expense  of  referring  it  to  the  people  ? 

I  am  no  longer  surprised  that  the  Legislature  of  this  State  should 
incorporate  banks,  with  the  privilege  of  emitting  their  notes  as*  a  circu- 
lating medium, when  I  am  informed  that  the  inembers]of  the  two  Houses 
are  the  people,  and  of  course  above  the  Constitution ;  the  prohibition 
contained  in  the  United  States  Constitution  is,  therefore,  not  binding 
on  our  Legislatures  !  Will  the  people  sanction  such  a  doctrine  /  I 
trust  not. 

I  hope  I  shall  be  permitted  to  speak  of  that  government  from  which 
we  derived  most  of  our  maxims  and  precedents  of  law,  and  our  doc- 
trine of  parliamentary  privileges  and  prerogatives,  and  contrast  it  with 
onr  own.  In  England,  all  power  is  lodged  in  the  King  and  two 
Houses  of  Parliament.  The  doctrine  there  prevails,  that  on  entering 
into  society,  men  give  up  their  rights  ;  but  the  truth  is,  that  the  peo- 
ple do  not  give  up  their  rights  voluntarily ;  they  are  wrested  from  them 
either  by  force  or  fraud.  When  William  the  Norman  invaded  and 
conquered  England,  he  divided  the  lands  amongst  his  followers,  and 
subjected  the  people  to  a  state  of  vassalage.  They  were  purchased  and 
sold  as  appendages  to  the  land.  It  is  true  some  alterations  in  the 
condition  of  the  common  people  have  been  effected  since  that  period ; 
but  it  is  only  a  change  to  a  state  of  dependence  still  more  degrading 
to  the  character  of  man. 

Ours  is  called  a  Democracy — that  is,  a  government  of  the  people — 
a  government  where  the  supreme  power  is  in  the  people ;  and  all  pow- 
er and  authority  emanate  from  them.  In  a  pure  Democracy,  the  peo- 
ple, in  their  collective  capacity,  meet  together  and  pass  laws ;  but  in 
large  communities  this  is  impracticable  ;  we  therefore  have  adopted 
what  we  call  a  Representative  Democracy  :  and  by  conventions  of  the 
people  have  formed  written  constitutions,  entrusting  the  management 
of  the  affairs  of  the  government  to  the  hands  of  representatives  or 
agents  ;  which  agents  or  representatives  are  divided  into  three  classes 
or  departments,  viz  :  Legislative,  Judicial  and  Executive  ;  as  checks 
and  balances  on  each  other ;  each  department  having  its  peculiar 
power  and  duties  assigned  to  it  by  the  Constitution  ;  and  neither  de- 
partment can  rightfully  exercise  or  interfere  with  the  powers  or  du- 
ties assigned  to  the  others.  Here  no  natural  right  is  given  up,  nor 
can  they  be,  because  they  are  inalienable.* 

*  "  The  individual,  by  entering  into  society,  promises  to  abstain 


1837.]  LOCOFOCO  FAKTvr.  127 

Constitutions  may  be  aptly  compared  to  powers  of  attorney,  and  the 
parties  to  principal  and  agent :  the  people  are  the  principal,  and  their 
representatives  the  agents,  and  the  constitution  the  power  of  attorney 
by  which  they  derive  their  authority,  and  by  which  their  duties  are 
defined,  and  their  powers  limited.  If  the  agent  transcend  his  authori- 
ty, his  principal  is  not  bound  by  such  act.  So  in  respect  to  the  peo- 
ple :  if  the  agents  of  either  department  of  the  government  transcend 
their  powers,  the  principals  are  not  bound  by  their  acts,  and  have  a 
right  to  call  them  to  an  account,  and  dismiss  them  from  their  em- 
ployment. 

[Here  Mr.  J.  asked,  and  was  permitted  to  read,  sundry  extracts 
from  a  speech  lately  delivered  by  Mr.  McKeon,  member  of  Congress 
from  the  City  of  New  York,  in  which  he  maintains  the  doctrine  that 
Congress  cannot  delegate  authority  to  a  Committee,  and  clothe  it  with 
power  to  send  for  persons  and  papers.  He  doubts  the  right  of  Con- 
gress, under  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States,  to  exercise  the  pow- 
ers and  privileges  claimed  by  the  British  House  of  Parliament,  to  pun- 
ish for  contempts.] 

I  now,  sir,  go  further  :  I  deny  that  Congress,  by  the  Constitution 
of  the  United  States,  is  clothed  with  any  system  of  privileges,  such  as 
is  claimed  and  exercised  by  the  British  House  of  Commons.  Such 
privileges  were  expressly  denied  to  Congress  by  the  Convention  which 
framed  that  instrument. 

i  OD-  the  20th  day  of  August,  1787,  a  proposition  was  submitted  to  a 
committee  of  five  members,  in  the  following  words :  "  Each  house 
shall  be  the  judge  of  its  own  privileges,  and  shaH  have  authority  to 
punish  by  imprisonment  every  person  viplating  the  same  :  or  who  in 
the  place  where  the  Legislature  may  be  sitting,  and  during  the  time 
of  the  session  shall  threaten  any  of  its  members  for  anything  said  or 
done  in  the  house,"  &c.  &c. 

This  committee  reported  on  the  22d  August,  1787,  against  invest- 
ing the  house  of  Congress  with  any  such  powers,  which  report  was 
concurred  in  by  the  convention. — See  4th  Vol.  Elliott's  Debates, pp.  140 
and  148.  Hence  it  is  clear,  that  Congress  possesses  no  such  powers  ; 
and  I  shall  make  it  equally  manifest  that  the  Legislature  of  this  State 
possesses  no  such  power  by  virtue  of  their  Constitution. 

The  2d  section  of  the  5th  article  of  the  constitution  of  the  State  of 
New  York  clothes  the  Legislature  with  the  only  judicial  or  criminal 
powers  it  can  lawfully  exercise. 

"  The  Assembly  shall  have  the  power  of  impeaching  all  civil  offi- 
cers of  this  State  for  mal  and  corrupt  conduct  in  office,  and  for  high 

from  whatever  is  inconsistent  with  the  existence  of  society ;  but  by 
entering  into  society  he  promises  nothing  more.  Society  promises  to 
restrain  and  to  redress  whatever  would  be  destructive  to  society,  but 
it  promises  no  more.  In  all  respects  the  parties  are  exactly  in  the 
situation  in  which  they  were  before  the  establishment  of  society." — 
Professor  Wayland. 


128  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837 

crimes  and  misdemeanors ;  but  a  majority  of  all  the  members  elected 
shall  concur  in  an  impeachment.  Before  the  trial  of  an  impeachment, 
the  members  of  the  court  shall  take  an  oath  or  affirmation,  truly  and 
impartially  to  try  and  determine  the  charge  in  question,  according  to 
evidence ;  and  no  person  shall  be  convicted  without  the  concurrence 
of  two-thirds  of  the  members  present.  Judgment,  in  cases  of  impeach- 
ment, shall  not  extend  farther  than  the  removal  from  office  and  dis- 
qualification to  hold  and  enjoy  any  office  of  honor,  trust  or  profit, 
under  this  State;  but  the  party  convicted  shall  be  liable  to  indictment 
and  punishment  according  to  law." 

I  also  find,  by  the  first  volume  of  the  Revised  Statutes,  so  late  as 
1829,  this  House  did  not  claim  the  powers  now  exercised.  The 
punishment  for  neglect  or  refusal  to  attend  as  a  witness,  was  a  fine 
of  one  hundred  dollars.  At  what  period,  and  by  what  means,  the 
privileges  exercised  by  this  House  were  engrafted  on  our  statute 
books,  I  leave  others  to  explain.  Doubtless  it  was  the  work  of  some 
common  law  pleader,  who  has  more  veneration  for  the  aristocratic 
British  parliamentary  law,  than  for  the  written  Democratic  constitu- 
tions of  this  country. 

Here  then  we  have  all  the  judicial  powers  granted  to  the  Assembly  ; 
and  these  powers  are  confined  exclusively  to  the  "  civil  officers  of  the 
State  for  mal  and  corrupt  conduct  in  office,  and  for  high  crimes  and 
misdemeanors ;"  and  their  punishment  is  confined  to  removal  from 
office,  and  disqualification  to  hold  and  enjoy  any  office  of  honor,  trust 
or  profit  under  this  State.  For  any  further  punishment,  they  are 
turned  over  to  the  proper  judicial  tribunals,  to  be  "  punished  accord- 
ing to  law;"  thereby  virtually  saying  the  assembly  shall  have  no  ju- 
dicial power  excepting  as  above.  Now,  whence  comes  the  right  of 
prerogative,  and  to  punish  for  contempt  ?  Not  from  the  constitute  n 
of  the  United  States,  or  of  this  state,  but  from  parliamentary  law  of 
Great  Britain.  And  has  it  come  to  this,  that  we  are  to  be  governed 
by  British  "  precedents"  and  "  parliamentary  usages,"  in  violation  of 
our  written  constitutions?  If  so,  it  is  time  that  the  public  so  under- 
stand it. 

I  have  now  fully  shown,  that  the  Assembly  of  this  state  does  not 
possess  the  power  to  punish  for  contempts,  but  that  such  power  is  ex- 
pressly forbidden.  The  4th  article  of  amendments  to  the  constitution 
of  the  United  States  provide? : 

"  The  right  of  the  people  to  be  secure  in  their  persons,  houses,  pa- 
pers and  effects,  against  unreasonable  searches  and  seizures  shall  not 
be  violated  ;  and  no  warrants  shall  issue  but  upon  probable  cause, 
supported  by  oath  or  affirmation,  and  particularly  describing  the  place 
to  be  searched,  and  the  persons  or  things  to  be  seized." 

Article  5.  "  No  person  shall  be  held  to  answer  for  a  capital  or 
otherwise  infamous  crime,  unless  on  a  presentment  or  indictment 
of  a  srand  jury.*  *  *  *  Nor  shall  be  compelled  in  any  criminal  case  to 
be  witness  against  himself,  nor  be  deprived  of  life,  liberty  or  property, 
without  due  process  of  law." 

Article  6.   "  In  all  criminal  prosecutions,  the  accused  shall  enjoy 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  129 

the  right  of  a  speedy  and  public  trial,  by  an  impartial  jury  of  the 
State  and  district  wherein  the  crime  shall  have  been  committed.  *  *  * 
To  be  confronted  with  the  witnesses  against  him ;  to  have  compulsory 
process  for  obtaining  witnesses  in  his  favor." 

The  7th  article  of  the  constitution  of  the  State  of  New-York,  sec- 
tions 1,  2  and  7,  contain  provisions  in  all  respects  similar  to  the 
above,  and  therefore  need  not  be  here  repeated. 

Let  me  now  compare  those  provisions  with  the  case  before  us. 
We  are  arrested  by  an  officer  of  this  House,  upon  a  warrant  issued 
by  the  Speaker  of  this  House  ;  we  are  forcibly  taken  from  our  homes, 
our  families,  our  business,  and  arraigned  at  this  bar,  to  answer  for  a 
contempt  of  its  authority.  We  are  tried,  condemned,  sentenced  and 
punished  by  this  House  :  and  all  this  in  violation  of  the  rights  guar- 
anteed to  every  citizen  by  the  Constitution  of  the  United  States  and 
of  this  State. 

1.  We  were  arrested  under  a  warrant  not  supported  by  any  oath 
or  affirmation. 

2.  It  was  served  by  the  Sergeant-at-Arms,  who  is  not  a  ministerial 
officer  of  any  court. 

3.  We  are  deprived  of  our  liberties  without  due  process  of  law. 

4.  We  are  arraigned  for  trial  without  a  presentment  or  indictment 
of  a  grand  jury. 

5.  We  are  compelled,  indirectly,  to  give  evidence  against  our- 
selves. 

6.  We  are  deprived  of  a  trial  by  an  impartial  jury. 

7.  We  are  not  confronted  with  the  witnesses  against  us,  nor  have 
we  compulsory  process  for  obtaining  witnesses  in  our  favor. 

In  all  of  the  above  particulars  have  our  rights  been  invaded  :  the 
accusing  party  being  the  judge,  jury,  and  executioner  of  the  sen- 
tence ;  thereby  uniting  the  legislative  with  the  judicial  and  execu- 
tive branches  of  the  government ;  breaking  down  every  barrier  of 
our  constitutions,  and  subjecting  us  to  the  will  of  a  majority  of  a 
legislative  body,  which  is  the  worst  of  despotisms  ! 

And  all  this — for  what  ?  Not  that  it  was  necessary  for  the  purposes 
of  justice;  not  that  there  was  no  other  and  a  more  constitutional 
mode  of  proceeding ;  but  to  vindicate  the  wounded  dignity  of  this 
House  of  Assembly  !  Strange  inconsistency  !  and  still  stranger  plea  ! 
And  is  it  come  to  this,  that  the  wounded  dignity  of  this  House  of  As- 
sembly must  be  revenged  by  a  violation  of  the  constitution  and  an  in- 
vasion of  the  rights  and  liberties  of  private  citizens  ? 

The  Assembly  of  the  State  of  New-York,  as  a  party  in  any  suit, 
must  be  considered  as  an  individual,  and  can  have  no  more  rights 
than  any  other  individual :  both  have  a  right  to  summon  witnesses  in 
any  legal  inquiry ;  and  if  the  witness  so  summoned  does  not  attend, 
after  being  legally  summoned,  on  due  proof  under  oath,  the  proper 
judicial  tribunal  can  issue  its  warrant  to  compel  them  to  appear  and 
answer  for  such  neglect  or  refusal,  and  inflict  punishment  if  neces- 
sary. This  is  all  the  power  which  this  Assembly  possesses  in  the 
premises,  and  is  all  that  it  is  necessary  it  should  possess,  in  order  to 


130  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

perform  its  duties  as  a  legislature ;  and  in  this  course  no  constitu- 
tional provision  would  be  violated,  and  no  private  right  or  personal 
liberty  invaded  :  a  perfect  harmony  would  be  preserved  in  all  the 
departments  of  the  government,  and  justice  thereby  be  promoted. 

I  entreat  you  to  pause  before  you  proceed  further  in  this  matter. 
I  have  been  dragged  forcibly  from  my  home  by  a  warrant  issued  by 
your  Speaker,  commanding  your  Sergeant-at-Arms  to  arrest  and  bring 
me  to  your  bar,  compelling  me  to  perform  a  long  journey  at  the  most 
inclement  season  of  the  year.  I  am  here  arraigned  for  an  offence 
not  known  to  the  constitution  of  this  country,  and  before  a  tribunal 
having  no  just  authority  to  arraign  or  try  me  for  the  alleged  pffence. 
Recollect,  the  members  of  this  House,  like  the  leaves  of  the  forest, 
are  but  annual  :  in  the  coming  autumn  you  will  descend  to  the  com- 
mon mass  of  society,  and  others  may  be  chosen  to  fill  your  seats ; 
and  for  aught  you  know,  some  one  of  you  may  be  placed  at  the  bar 
where  I  now  stand.  In  such  case,  what  would  be  your  sensations  ? 
I  conjure  you  to  pause — to  reflect.  Be  not  hasty  to  pronounce  your 
decision.  I  ask  you  to  exercise  that  most  important  moral  precept, 
"  Do  as  you  would  be  done  by."  I  trust  you  will  not  let  prejudice  or 
party  feelings  influence  your  decision.  Although  I  felt  indignant  at 
the  treatment  I  first  received  at  your  hands,  yet,  after  a  little  reflec- 
tion, I  forgave  all,  knowing  that  "  to  err  is  human." 

I  will  here  take  the  liberty  to  indulge  in  a  little  egotism.  I  am  de- 
scended from  a  family  which  has  been  noted  for  its  attachment  to 
liberal  principles,  both  civil  and  religious,  for  at  least  three  centuries 
past.  My  ancestors  were  French  Protestants,  who  fled  from  France, 
and  settled  in  England,  in  the  15th  century,  at  the  time  of  the  repeal 
of  the  Edict  of  Nantz,  when  the  Catholics  were  let  loose  upon  the 
Protestants,  and  indiscriminately  massacred  all  who  came  in  their 
way.  From  England  they  emigrated  to  New-England  about  the  year 
1640 ;  frem  whence  my  immediate  ancestors  emigrated  to  and  settled 
in  New-Jersey.  My  father,  at  the  commencement  of  the  revolution- 
ary war,  with  his  little  band  of  Jersey  blues,  under  the  command  of 
the  illustrious  Washington,  met  the  enemy  at  the  water's  edge  on 
Long  Island,  and  contested  the  ground  with  them  inch  by  inch,  until 
compelled  to  retreat  across  Manhattan  Island  to  New-Jersey.  Here 
he  was  entrusted  with  an  important  command  until  the  close  of  the 
war,  when,  Cincinnatus-like,  he  retired  to  his  farm,  with  a  shattered 
constitution  and  an  impaired  fortune.  From  him  I  inherited  a  love 
for  freedom,  which  has  been  cherished  until  this  period  of  my  life; 
and  although  fur  advanced  in  years,  I  enjoy  good  health,  and,  as  you 
may  suppose,  some  firmness  of  purpose,  which  may  be  construed  into 
obstinacy  by  some ;  be  that  as  it  may,  I  am  conscious  of  no  motives 
but  a  love  of  justice,  of  truth,  of  liberty,  and  of  humanity,  and  from 
the  pursuit  of  which  no  power  on  earth  shall  deter  me.  While  I  hold 
myself  and  all  others  bound  strictly  to  observe  and  obey  alt  laws  con- 
stitutionally made,  yet  I  deem  it  equally  the  duty  of  every  citizen 
to  raise  his  voice  against  every  bad  and  unconstitutional  law ;  and 
even  submit  to  its  penalties,  rather  than  yield  a  tacit  compliance  with 
unconstitutionally  and  injustice. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  131 

The  honorable  members  of  this  House  represent  the  wisdom,  the 
intelligence  and  the  patriotism  of  the  good  people  of  this  State.  Its 
future  character,  as  well  as  the  liberties  of  the  citizens,  will  much 
depend  on  the  manner  in  which  this  vitally  important  question  shall 
be  settled.  I  thank  the  House  for  the  indulgence  of  a  hearing.  The 
object  so  anxiously  desired  has  been  attained.  I  have  been  permitted 
partially  to  explain  my  views  on  the  question  of  the  powers  of  this 
Assembly  to  punish  for  contempt.  I  am  now  satisfied ;  and  am 
ready,  and  always  have  been  willing,  to  go  before  your  committee, 
and  testify  all  I  know  relative  to  the  petition  in  question. 

Thus  did  M.  Jaques  conclude  his  lecture  to  the  House 
of  Assembly  of  the  state  of  New  York.  He  repaid 
with  interest  the  unmeaning  reprimand  he  received  from 
the  speaker  by  retorting  such  a  reprimanding  as  the  house 
richly  deserved  ;  one  that  had  sense,  argument  and  consti- 
tutional bearing  in  it.  We  should  like  to  have  heard  that 
venerable  man  giving  his  constitutional  schooling  to  the 
half-made-up  lawyer  legislators  in  the  house.  He  gave 
the  members  the  best  lesson  they  ever  received  in  Ameri- 
can constitutional  Democracy,  vulgarly  called  Loco-Fo- 
coism. 

The  house  finally  decided  that  Mr.  J.  should  remain  in 
the  custody  of  the  Sergeant-at-Arms,  until  he  should  com- 
ply with  the  subpoena  to  appear  and  testify  before  the  se- 
lect committee,  and  in  that  shape  it  was  adopted ;  ayes 
74,  noes  27.  The  House  then  adjourned. 

Immediately  thereafter,  the  following  note  was  directed 
to  Mr.  Slamm : 

"  SIR — This  afternoon,  at  3  o'clock  precisely,  at  Room  13  Congress 
Hall,  the  Select  Committee  will  examine  Mr.  Slamm;  Mr.  Patterson, 
the  Chairman,  being  engaged  at  5," 

At  the  time  set  forth  in  this  polite  invitation,  Messrs. 
Jaques  and  Slamm  went  before  the  committee  with  a  full 
knowledge  that  they  did  it  voluntarily ;  and  were  sworn 
and  testified  touching  the  petition  in  question.  And  read- 
er, what  think  you  was  the  amount  of  their  testimony  ? 
It  was  simply  this,  that  they  signed  the  petition  in  the  city 
of  New  York  and  that  they  knew  nothing  further  about 
it.  The  fact  is,  the  petition  was  conceived  and  drawn  up 


132  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

by  the  author  of  this  history,  and  Mr.  Roosevelt  had  no 
more  to  do  with  its  getting  up,  or  being  signed,  or  sent  to 
Albany,  than  the  Speaker  himself. 

The  Legislature  after  acting  with  manifest  unconsti- 
tutionally in  the  persecution  of  M.  Jaques  and  L.  D. 
Slamm  were  compelled  to  accede  to  the  conditions  of  those 
whom  they  imagined  would  submit  to  a  law  which  vio- 
lates the  constitutional  rights  of  American  citizens."  The 
conduct  of  the  House,  from  first  to  last,  was  composed  of 
ungenerous  suspicions,  unjustifiable  usurpation  and  unmiti- 
gated meanness.  We  prove  their  meanness  by  the  fact 
that  the  House  did  not  pay  the  expenses  of  the  men  that 
were  dragged  from  their  homes  and  families  for  the  sake 
of  its  dignity,  thus  showing  itself  destitute  of  that  moral 
dignity  which  makes  restitution  for  loss  or  injury  inflicted. 
Had  the  House  been  really  above  contempt,  it  never 
would  have  had  the  puerile  idea  that  a  private  citizen 
could  treat  it  with  contempt.  Messrs.  Jaques  and  Slamm 
wrote  that  they  were  willing  to  obey  the  subpoena  of  the 
committee  if  their  expenses  would  be  paid.  Their  stipu- 
lation was  just  and  legal,  and  had  the  members  possessed 
moral  sense,  they  would  have  so  considered  it.  But  the 
same  body  of  men  at  a  later  date  violated  their  constitu- 
tional obligations  by  the  passage  of  the  Bank  suspension 
law. 


CHAPTER   X. 

Equal  Rights  Party  Resolution  on  the  Contempt  Case — Sketches  of 
Levi  D.  Slamm — M.  Jaques  nominated  as  candidate  for  the  May- 
oralty— Park  Meeting — Address  and  Resolutions — Nomination  of 
M.  Jaques,  is  confirmed — Incident — Loco-Foco  Nominations  for  the 
Common  Council — Correspondence  with  M.  Jaques — Election 
Results — Remarks — Call  for  Park  Meeting,  3d  of  May — Meeting, 
Address  and  Resolutions — Remarks — Run  on  the  Banks  for  Spe- 
cie— Bank  white-washing  Committee — Suspension  Law  and  Re- 
marks— The  Credit  System  turns  out  to  be  the  System  of  Debt. 

There  are  no  necessary  evils  in  government ;  thoy  exist  only  in  its  abuses. 

ANDREW  JACKSON 

WHILE  Mr.  Jaques  was  vindicating  the  rights  of  Ame- 
rican citizens  in  the  capitol  at  Albany,  the  Loco  Focos  in 
the  city  of  New-York  manifested  in  their  Ward  meetings 
the  deep  interest  which  they  felt ;  and  when  information 
of  the  reprimand  reached  the  city,  every  member  of  the 
party  was  roused  to  indignation.  In  the  8th  Ward  where 
Mr.  Jaques  had  his  residence,  the  following  resolution 
was  unanimously  passed. 

Resolved,  "  That  the  House  of  Assembly  of  this  State,  by  its  ex- 
post-facto  legislation  in  passing  a  resolution  for  the  occasion,  '  that 
this  house  possesses  legal  and  constitutional  powers  to  punish  for  con- 
tempt,' showed  a  wilful  contempt  of  the  Constitutional  Rights  of  the 
people,  and  therefore  the  house  is  reprimanded  by  us,  a  portion  of  the 
sovereign  people,  at  the  bar  of  public  opinion." 

In  all  the  Equal  Rights  Party  Ward  meetings,  resolutions 
were  passed  condemnatory  of  the  adoption  of  the  British 
parliamentary  usage  of  reprimanding  or  punishing  for  con- 
tempts, and  in  some  the  usage  was  held  up  to  ridicule.   A 
Gilpinade  ballad  was  composed,  from  which  the  stanza 
quoted  at  the  beginning  of  the  preceding  chapter  is  taken. 
It  was  entitled  "  The  Assembly's  Vengeance  against  wil- 
ful contempt ;  telling  how  the  house  of  Assembly  was 
wickedly  contemned  by  Moses  Jaques  and  Levi  D.  Slamm, 
12 


134  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

and  how  the  said  conteraners  were  scolded  and  repri- 
manded therefor." 

The  greetings  which  the  above  named  gentlemen  re- 
ceived on  their  return  to  the  city  were  sincere  and  enthu- 
siastic. The  party  at  once  determined  to  run  M.  Jaques 
for  the  Mayoralty  at  the  ensuing  charter  election. 

Levi  D.  Slamtn  had  been  previously  known  as  a  useful 
man  at  drawing  up  resolutions,  and  also  as  a  secretary  at 
many  of  the  Loco-Foco  meetings.  Shakspeare  says  that 
"  a  rose  by  any  other  name  would  smell  as  sweet,"  but 
it  was  exactly  the  reverse  with  Mr.  Slamm,  for  with  any 
other  name  he  would  not  have  acquired  the  same  renown. 
With  this  name  the  New-York  Herald  did  much  for  him, 
by  adding  Bang  to  it  for  the  sake  of  ludicrous  euphony  : 
hence  Slamm  Bang  &  Company  became  its  favorite  de- 
signation for  the  Equal  Rights  Party.  Mr.  Slamm  is  de- 
ficient in  logical  as  well  as  philosophical  powers  of  mind  ; 
he  has  more  perception  than  thought,  which  is  of  great 
advantage  to  him  as  the  Editor  of  a  paper.  He  takes  so 
much  pleasure  in  publishing  ably  written  articles,  that  he 
always  inserts  them  as  editorials,  and  hence  he  has  had 
the  good  or  ill  fortune  of  being  overrated.  He  is  an  active 
political  partizan,  the  man  of  the  present,  the  surface  of 
which  engages  his  whole  attention,  for  he  has  none  of 
that  reflective  foresight  which  sees  the  future  that  is 
growing  out  of  the  present ;  consequently,  whatever  or 
whoever  is  the  popular  rage  of  the  day,  has  charms  for 
him,  and  if  he  can,  he  will  use  the  same  to  promote  the 
present  success  of  himself  or  party — and  he  looks  not  be- 
yond. Such  is  Mr.  Slamm,  whose  name,  luckily  for  him, 
was  given  to  a  political  party.  But  so  it  often  is ; — 
"  some  men  are  born  great,  and  some  have  greatness 
thrust  upon  them." 

In  due  time  the  wards  made  out  their  nominations  for 
the  Mayoralty,  and  at  the  general  County  meeting,  M. 
Jaques  received  the  majority  of  votes,  and  was  duly  nomi- 
nated "  without  a  dissenting  voice."  At  the  same  meet- 
ing officers  were  chosen  for  the  Park  meeting,  on  the 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  135 

third  of  April ;  the  public  call  for  which  meeting  was  as 
follows : 

"AGAIN  TO  THE  PARK— TO  THE  PARK. 

The  People  are  sovereign. — 

They  will  meet  in  the  Park,  rain  or  shine,  on  Monday, 
April  3d,  at  half  past  two  o'clock,  to  unite  against  those 
moral  and  political  abuses,  the  curse  of  paper  money,  the 
market  and  ferry  monopolies,  and  to  reform  the  city  gov- 
ernment, in  order  to  bring  down  the  high  prices  of  bread, 
meat,  rent,  and  fuel." 

The  reader  is  presented  with  the  following  extracts 
from  the  proceedings  of  the  Park  meeting,  April  3d, 
which  are  recommended  to  his  perusal.  They  were 
written  by  Mr.  Hunt. 

CD- THIRD  GREAT  MEETING  IN  THE  PARK  !— THE  PEOPLE 
COMING  TO  THE  RESCUE  ! — Yesterday,  April  3,  1837,  at  half  past 
twelve  o'clock,  the  people  convened,  in  immense  numbers,  in  the 
PARK,  to  take  measures  to  redress  their  grievances,  and  to  decide 
upon  the  Constitutional  mode  to  reduce  the  prices  of  Bread,  Meat, 
Rent,  and  Fuel.  The  meeting  was  called  to  order  by  Col.  GEORGE 
DIXEY. 

After  an  address  from  the  President,  SETH  LUTHER,  and  from 
another  mechanic,  Mr.  LEVI  D.  SLAMM  offered  the  following 
preamble  and  resolutions,  written  by  John  H.  Hunt,  which  were 
received  with  great  eclat,  and  unanimously  adopted  by  the  assem- 
bled multitude  : 

Whenever  a  people  find  themselves  suffering  under  a  weight  of 
evils,  destructive  not  only  to  their  happiness,  but  to  their  dignity  and 
their  virtues  ;  when  these  evils  go  on  increasing  year  after  year,  with 
accelerating  rapidity,  and  threaten  soon  to  reach  that  point  at  which 
peaceable  endurance  ceases  to  be  possible ;  it  becomes  their  solemn 
duty  coolly  to  search  out  the  causes  of  their  suffering — to  state  those 
causes  with  plainness — and  to  apply  a  sufficient  and  a  speedy 
remedy. 

The  world  has  always  abounded  with  men,  who,  rather  than  toil  to 
produce  the  wealth  necessary  to  their  subsistence,  have  contrived  to 
strip  others  of  the  fruits  of  their  labor,  either  by  violence  and  blood- 
shed, or  by  swaggering  pretensions  to  exclusive  privileges. 

It  is,  however,  chiefly  by  this  latter  mode  of  robbery,  lhat  the  work- 
ing classes  of  modern  times  are  kept  in  debasement  and  poverty. 
Aristocrats  have  discovered  that  charters  are  safer  weapons  than 
swords ;  and  that  cant,  falsehood,  and  hypocrisy  serve  all  the  purposes 
of  a  highwayman's  pistol,  while  they  leave  their  victims  alive  and  fit 
for  future  exactions. 


136  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

Thus  have  the  producers  of  wealth  been  kept  for  ages  in  subjection 
to  a  wicked  confederacy,  whose  interest  it  has  been  to  sow  strife  and 
dissension  among  them,  lest  they  should  unite  and  redress  their 
wrongs ;  to  paralyze  their  intellect,  lest  their  own  pompous  preten- 
sions should  become  objects  of  ridicule  and  derision  ;  and  to  pervert 
the  moral  sense  of  mankind,  lest  themselves  should  become  objects  of 
universal  execration. 

It  was  the  curse  of  such  an  aristocracy  that  drove  our  fathers  to 
the  savage  wilds  of  a  distant  continent ; — it  was  the  hope  of  releasing 
us,  their  descendants,  from  such  a  thraldom,  that  supported  them 
during  the  terrible  struggle  of  the  revolution,  when  they  boldly  ad- 
vanced against  the  myrmidons  of  injustice,  leaving  the  bloody  tracks 
of  their  unclad  feet  upon  the  frozen  ground. 

They  saw  that  in  the  governments  of  the  old  world,  the  laborer 
was  represented  by  the  drone ;  the  producer  by  the  consumer ;  the 
sheep  by  the  wolf; — and  they  established  here  a  government,  the  con- 
stitution of  which  not  only  prohibited  the  creation  of  monopolies  and 
exclusive  privileges,  but  which  enabled  the  producers  of  wealth  to 
represent  themselves  by  agents  taken  from  their  own  ranks,  and  hav- 
ing a  common  interest  and  a  common  sympathy. 

Our  fathers  performed  their  duties  well ;  but  we  have  neglected 
ours,  and  hence  our  suffering.  We  have  suffered  our  political 
power  to  fall  into  the  hands  of  men  who  fatten  on  the  diseases  of  the 
body  politic,  and  whose  trade  requires  them  daily  to  defend  guilt  for 
a  share  of  its  plunder,  or  to  exact  money  for  advocating  the  cause  of 
the  innocent.  We  have  suffered  these  men  to  violate  and  set  at 
naught  that  constitution  which  cost  so  much  toil  and  suffering — to 
confer  on  favored  combinations,  not  merely  titles  of  nobility,  but  the 
more  substantial  privilege  of  taking  interest  from  their  creditors — the 
more  than  princely  privilege  of  taking  houses,  lands  and  labor,  while 
they  build  no  houses  and  give  no  labor  in  return. 

Therefore,  in  consideration  of  the  facts  set  forth  in  this  preamble, 
be  it 

Resolved — That  we  solemnly  pledge  ourselves  to  one  another,  and 
to  the  laboring  classes  throughout  the  land,  that  we  will  unite  and 
strive  with  our  utmost  vigor  to  effect  such  a  reform  that  those  who 
sow  shall  reap,  and  those  who  produce  shall  enjoy. 

That,  as  the  first  step  towards  such  a  reform,  we  will  cause  the 
producing  interest  to  be  represented  in  our  legislative  halls  hereafter 
by  actual  producers. 

That  we  will  endeavor  to  show  during  the  coming  contest  that  we 
are  warring  not  against  individuals,  but  against  a  system  of  wrong 
and  oppression;  and  that  we  are  contending  not  for  the  spoils  and 
trappings  of  power,  but  for  the  rights  of  man. 

That,  notwithstanding  the  extremity  of  our  wrongs  and  sufferings, 
we  will  oppose  all  rioting  and  violence  ;  and  we  call  on  all  our  fellow- 
citizens  to  give  our  aristocracy  no  pretext  for  establishing  a  military 
power  to  enslave  and  plunder  us  for  ever. 

That  we  heartily  approve  the  conduct  of  the  late  president  in 
checking  the  attempts  of  speculators  to  monopolize  the  remainder  of 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO   PARTY.  137 

the  people's  lands,  for  no  other  compensation  than  bank  promises : 
That  we  approve  the  present  executive's  refusal  to  rescind  his  prede- 
cessor's act ;  and  we  trust  he  will  never  mistake  the  outcry  of  noisy 
speculators  for  the  voice  of  the  people. 

That  the  precious  metals  are  the  only  constitutional  currency,  and 
should  ever  be  insisted  on  by  the  industrious  classes  as  the  actual 
circulating  medium,  to  bring  to  the  test  every  species  of  credit  cur- 
rency, and  suppress  the  spurious  paper  system. 

That  iu  Moses  Jaques,  the  Equal  Rights  candidate  for  Mayor,  we 
recognize  an  honest  patriot  of  the  old  school,  struggling  in  his  ad- 
vanced age  for  those  glorious  principles  of  equality  and  right  for 
which  he  contended  by  his  father's  side  in  the  war  of  the  revolution. 

The  following  incident  gave  much  pleasure  at  the  time  of  its  occur- 
rence : — On  reading  the  resolution  in  relation  to  the  nomination  of 
the  revolutionary  patriot,  Moses  Jaques,  for  the  office  of  Mayor,  a 
banner  was  unfurled  containing  the  nomination  in  large  letters,  and 
as  the  people  commenced  cheering,  the  sun  for  the  first  time  that  fore- 
noon, burst  from  the  clouded  sky  and  shone  in  full  splendor  on  the 
assembled  multitude.  The  coincidence  was  felt  as  a  favorable  omen 
by  many  present,  and  excited  renewed  cheering. 

Moses  Jaques  addressed  the  meeting :  he  stated  that  he  held  it  to 
be  the  duty  of  every  candidate  for  any  office  of  importance,  to  explain 
as  an  honest  man  and  a  democrat  his  political  principles  to  the  peo- 
ple, that  the  electors  might  know  for  whom  they  give  their  support. 
Nominated  for  an  important  office,  he  felt  pride  rather  than-  delicacy 
in  doing  so.  Should  the  people  think  fit  to  repose  their  confidence  in 
him,  upon  the  altar  of  Liberty  he  would  swear  open  opposition  to 
every  species  of  tyranny,  monopoly,  and  injustice.  He  retired  amid 
loud  and  enthusiastic  cheering. 

While  the  Equal  Rights  party  were  holding  public 
meetings,  nominating  candidates,  and  making  prepara- 
tions for  the  city  charter  election,  the  Federal  Whigs  and 
monopoly  Democrats  were  equally  busy,  and  much  more 
deeply  interested,  so  far  as  offices  and  emoluments  were 
involved.  Aaron  Clark  was  nominated  by  the  Whigs  as 
their  candidate  for  the  Mayoralty,  but  the  monopoly  De- 
mocratic party  appeared  to  be  much  shocked  at  the  fact 
of  a  lottery  ticket  vender  being  held  up  for  the  Mayor- 
alty, and  therefore  it  nominated  a  candidate  who  pos- 
sessed as  high  a  degree  of  gentility  of  rank,  respectability 
and  wealth,  as  the  city  would  furnish.  If  the  laws,  in- 
stitutions and  customs  growing  out  of  them,  in  any  coun- 
try make  lottery  ticket  and  stock  scrip  venders,  who  is 
to  blame  1  They,  (tickets  and  scrip),  as  well  as  goods 
12* 


138  HISTORY    OF    THE  [1837. 

and  labor,  while  they  are  legal  commodities,  are  equally 
respectable  so  long  as  legislation  specially  regards  them 
as  "  business  wants  of  the  community." 

In  April,  1837,  there  were  three  candidates  held  up  for 
the  Mayoralty  of  New  York ;  Aaron  Clark,  John  I.  Mor- 
gan, and  Moses  Jaques.  In  respect  to  character,  and 
probably  circumstances,  the  latter  is  the  equal  of  either 
of  his  competitors ;  but  as  respects  talents  and  informa- 
tion, it  is  not  saying  much  to  state  that  he  is  superior  to 
both.  It  was  thought  in  Washington  that  he  was  a  good 
Democrat,  and  as  good  a  candidate  as  the  Tammany 
committee  could  find  in  the  city.  But  it  is  not  in  the 
nature  of  monopolists  to  listen  to  any  suggestion  that 
might  be  contrary  to  their  vested  interests.  They  are 
not  for  progress,  their  instinct  is  to  hold  on  to  all  estab- 
lished abuses,  under  their  old  dogma,  that  "  things  were 
always  so,  and  always  will  be  so." 

The  following  were  the  Equal  Rights  party  nomina- 
tions for  the  Common  Council : 

Ward.  Aldermen.  Assistants. 

4th  George  S.  Mann,  D.  C.  Pentz, 

5th  "F.  S.  Cozzens,  Daniel  D.  Ideson, 

7th  M.  Dougherty,  Daniel  Gorham, 

8th  Charles  Dingley,  John  H.  Hunt, 

9th  Israel  Ketchum,  William  M.  Thorpe, 

10th  R.  J.  Smith,  Philip  Snedecor, 

llth  B.  F.  Halleck,  J.  W.  Walker, 

13th  T.  S.  Secor,  John  Wilder, 

14th  Stephen  Hasbrouck,  J.  J.  Brinkerhoff, 

15th  Edward  J.  W7ebb,  Francis  Murphy, 

16th  George  B.  Thorpe,  George  Dixey, 

17th  Thomas  Chappell,  P.  B.  Smith. 

The  committee  that  was  appointed  to  correspond  with 
M.  Jaques  received  an  answer  from  him,  perfectly  satis- 
factory to  the  Equal  Rights  party.  We  insert  the  fol- 
lowing extracts  ; 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO   PARTY.  139 

"  I  have  always  been  opposed  to  the  doctrine  that  a  public  debt  is 
a  public  blessing.  On  the  contrary  I  hold  that  the  credit  system  is 
wrong  in  principle,  and  must  be  ruinous  in  its  effects  on  the  integrity, 
the  morals,  and  the  ultimate  prosperity  of  a  people.  I  am,  therefore, 
opposed  to  it  in  a  governmental  as  well  as  in  an  individual  point  of 
view,  and  should  feel  myself  bound  to  oppose  all  increase  of  the  pre- 
sent or  creation  of  any  other  public  debt  beyond  the  means  to  pay  of 
those  who  contracted  it,  because  it  is  an  unjust  act  to  entail  on  pos- 
terity a  debt,  in  the  contracting  of  which  it  could  not  have  been  con- 
sulted." 

"  Whilst  laws  are  unequal,  and  consequently  unjust,  the  largest 
portion  of  the  community  will  be  poor  ;  and  such  community  is  bound 
by  every  principle  of  humanity  to  make  ample  provision  for  all  those 
who  through  age  or  infirmity  are  unable  to  support  themselves. 
When  governments  learn  to  be  just,  poverty  will,  in  a  great  measure,  be 
unknown,  and  the  laws  for  the  maintenance  of  the  poor  unnecessary. 
But,  as  society  is  now  constituted,  poor  law?  are  imperatively  de- 
manded ;  and,  therefore,  public  economy  and  humanity  require  a 
strict  accountability  of  agents  to  prevent  oppression,  embezzlement, 
and  waste." 

The  views  of  M.  Jaques  on  other  questions  of  muni- 
cipal reforms,  were  of  the  true  Democratic  stamp,  but  he 
was  not  of  the  credit  system  Democracy.  Nevertheless 
he  obtained  over  four  thousand  votes  at  the  election ; 
John  I.  Morgan  obtained  over  thirteen  thousand,  and 
Aaron  Clark  received  over  seventeen  thousand  votes. 
The  latter  had  about  seven  hundred  votes  less  than  both 
his  competitors,  hence  it  is  clear  that  M.  Jaques  would 
have  been  elected  Mayor,  had  the  monopoly  Democracy 
supported  him.  But  perhaps  with  all  the  moral  horror 
expressed  towards  the  dealer  in  lottery  tickets,  the 
managers  in  bank  scrip  would  prefer  the  lucky  Whig  to 
the  Loco-Foco  Democrat. 

The  old  democracy  lost  the  Common  Council  as  well 
as  the  Mayoralty  ;  and  this  was  of  far  more  importance 
than  democratic  principles,  because  a  clear  sweep  of  offi- 
cial incumbents  took  place,  followed  as  usual  by  a  tre- 
mendous outcry  of  proscription.  The  ire  of  the  old- 
fashioned  republican  press  was  re-kindled  to  greater  bit- 
terness than  ever,  against  the  Equal  Rights  party,  which, 
by  running  its  own  candidates,  caused  a  total  change  in 
all  departments  of  the  city  govenrment.  But  the  Loco- 


140  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

Focos  could  see  no  great  difference  in  principles  between 
national  Bank  Whigs  and  State  Bank  democrats,  and 
therefore  run  candidates  against  both,  without  caring  for 
the  triumph  of  either.  They  regarded  the  Banking  sys- 
tem of  the  State  of  New-York,  with  its  safety  fund  league 
and  restraining  law,  as  a  hydra-headed  monster  whose 
overthrow  was  essential  to  human  rights  and  human 
progress.  They  saw  it  was  absolutely  vain  to  hope  for 
any  reform  voluntarily  from  that  party  which  ha'd  con- 
nected itself  almost  indissolubly  with  the  system. 

The  words  of  that  popular  man,  Andrew  Jackson,  in 
his  farewell  address,  were  engraven  on  their  memories. 
"  The  paper  money  system,  and  its  natural  associates,  mo- 
nopoly and  exclusive  privileges,  have  taken  deep  root  in 
the  soil,  and  it  will  require  all  your  efforts  to  prevent  its 
further  growth,  and  to  eradicate  the  evil."  Already  the 
banks  were  sovereign  over  the  action  of  the  legislature, 
and  the  only  hope  was  iti  the  action  of  the  people  them- 
selves ;  that  is,  in  the  ballot,  to  disorganize  the  governing 
power  of  the  State  Bank  party,  and  in  the  use  of  bank 
notes,  to  demand  specie  for  them.  Hence  the  running  of 
candidates;  and  hence  in  every  meeting  in  the  Park  a 
resolution  urging  the  working  people  to  go  to  the  banks  for 
specie ;  and  when  another  meeting  was  called  in  the  Park 
for  the  third  of  May,  the  call  was  headed  in  large  type, 

SPECIE!  SPECIE! 

The  people  will  meet  again  in  the  Park  on  Wednesday,  May  3d,  at 
half  past  one  o'clock,  rain  or  shine,  to  adopt  measures  to  retrieve  our 
country  from  the  desolating  influence  of  Paper  money,  and  to  insist 
on  Gold  and  Silver  being  demanded  for  the  public  Lands,  and  being 
paid  to  the  farmers,  mechanics  and  other  useful  classes  of  Society,  as 
the  constitutional  and  just  recompense  of  their  honest  toil,  and  to  op- 
pose the  efforts  now  making  to  perpetuate  the  paper  money  fraud  by 
the  establishment  of  another  National  Bank. 

LEVI  D.  SLAMM,  ED.  J.  WEBB, 
CHAS.  DINGLEY,  THOS.  DYER, 
JOHN  HECKER,  D.  MURPHY, 

GEORGE  DIXEY. 

The  meeting  took  place  accordingly,  and  Chas.  G. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  141 

Ferris  was  called  on  to  preside,  assisted  by  eight  vice- 
presidents  and  four  secretaries.  Messrs.  Ferris,  Ming  and 
Haskell  addressed  the  crowd,  and  were  loudly  applauded. 
The  following  is  a  portion  of  the  "  Address  of  the  pro- 
ducing classes  of  the  city  of  New  York  friendly  to  the 
policy  of  substituting  a  specie  currency  for  a  promise 
currency,  to  the  people  of  the  United  States."  It  was 
written  by  Mr.  Hunt. 

FELLOW  CITIZENS: — 

At  a  time  like  this  we  need  make  no  apology  for  addressing  you, 
nor  for  uttering  our  sentiments  with  plainness  and  truth. 

Many  years  ago,  when,  in  consequence  of  buying  much  and  selling 
little,  the  balance  of  trade  was  greatly  against  us,  an  attempt  was 
made  by  Congress  to  protect  American  labor  from  being  undersold  in 
its  own  market,  by  laying  heavy  taxes  upon  all  imported  work.  But 
this  measure  only  enabled  the  Banks  to  depreciate  the  currency  to  a 
still  greater  extent  before  they  rendered  themselves  liable  to  be  called 
upon  for  specie  for  foreign  balances.  It  did  very  little  towards  raising 
the  wages  of  labor,  while  it  added  much  to  the  price  required  from 
the  laborer  for  the  products  of  industry.  To  show  the  utter  useless- 
ness  of  this  "  protecting  system,"  it  is  only  necessary  to  state,  that 
it  is  still  in  force,  and  consequently,  if  good  for  anything,  would 
have  saved  us  from  the  present  crisis. 

We  propose,  therefore,  that  now,  instead  of  attempting  to  create  a 
market  for  our  own  labor  by  adding  to  the  taxes  on  imported  industry, 
we  unite  to  throw  off,  as  fast  as  possible,  all  taxes  upon  our  own.  This 
great  end  accomplished,  we  can  live  in  ease  and  plenty,  and  at  the 
same  time  turn  the  tables  upon  those  nations  which  have  so  long 
found  a  market  here,  and  undersell  them  at  their  own  doors. 

The  principal  taxes  paid  by  the  producing  classes  in  all  countries, 
(tax-ridden  England  not  excepted),  are  not  the  immense  sums  paid 
for  the  support  of  government,  but  the  incomparably  greater  sums 
paid  for  rents  and  interest.  And  these  latter  taxes  are  much  higher 
in  America  than  in  any  other  country  under  Heaven. 

In  Europe  the  rate  of  interest  varies  from  three  to  five  per  cent : — 
here  it  varies  from  six  to  fifty,  and  these  rates  are  paid  not  only  on 
money,  but  on  millions  of  bank  promises.  Some  idea  of  the  amount 
we  pay  on  promises  may  be  formed  from  the  fact,  that  over  two 
hundred  millions  have  been  added  to  our  bank  capital  within  the  last 
two  years. 

This  heavy  tax  of  interest  can  be  thrown  off  only  by  our  adopting 
the  hard  cash  system  in  place  of  that  cheating  game  of  hazard,  credit — 
and  to  this  step  the  invincible  laws  of  necessity  will  doubtless  soon 
force  us. 

We  have  room  only  for  a  portion  of  the  resolutions.  They  were 
drawn  up  by  Chas.  G.  Ferris. 


142  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837 

Resolved,  "  That  we  believe  that  the  difficulties  and  embarrassments 
under  which  the  community  is  laboring  are  the  result  of  a  combina- 
tion of  causes  among  which  the  most  prominent  are : — 

An  undue  expansion  of  the  credit  and  paper  system,  not  only  in  this 
country  but  throughout  the  commercial  world,  which  induced  an  ex- 
cessive importation  of  foreign  goods  and  merchandize  far  beyond  the 
exports  of  the  country,  and  created  a  debt  now  pressing  upon  us  with 
great  severity. 

Our  excessive  high  tariff  system,  by  which  a  revenue  has  been 
collected  from  the  people  far  beyond  the  actual  want  of  the  govern- 
ment, which  evil  has  been  aggravated  in  our  commercial  cities  by  the 
late  act  of  congress  requiring  a  distribution  of  the  surplus  revenue, 
whereby  a  large  part  of  the  public  deposits  have  been  drawn  from  the 
commercial  sections  of  the  country  to  the  interior. 

Improvident  state  legislation  in  chartering  banks  and  extending  the 
paper  currency,  until  public  confidence  has  been  shaken  in  the  ability 
of  the  banks  to  redeem  their  engagements." 

Now  all  this  was  exactly  true,  and  the  truth  was  proven 
in  a  few  days  afterwards ;  for,  on  the  seventh  of  May,  the 
fourth  day  after  the  meeting,  a  run  began  upon  the  banks 
for  specie.  The  greater  portion  of  the  public  press  was 
highly  indignant  at  the  want  of  confidence  in  the  people  ; 
and  one  of  the  bank  commissioners  stood  on  the  steps  of 
the  Mechanics'  Bank  in  Wall"  street,  and  assured  the 
crowd  of  the  soundness  and  ability  of  the  banks  to  pay 
specie  for  all  their  circulation.  Nevertheless,  the  run  con- 
tinued on,  on,  on.  The  bank  directors  knew  well  their 
inability,  and  that  they  would  suspend  ;  but  they  dreaded 
the  popular  indignation  in  such  an  event,  and  therefore 
guns  and  men  were  procured  to  pay  their  creditors,  the 
working  people,  in  specie  bullets,  as  they  had  not  enough 
of  constitutional  coin.  "  And  accordingly,"  wrote  Mayor 
Clark,  "  a  numerous  civil  force  and  a  large  body  of  mili- 
tia were  called  into  service.  Watchmen  and  marshals 
were  stationed  within  and  near  the  banking  houses,  and 
the  militia  at  those  places  from  which  they  could  be  most 
readily  withdrawn  for  efficient  duty."  How  numerous  are 
the  instances  in  history  of  aristocracy  acting  in  this  way 
towards  the  plundered  masses  ?  The  Norman  conquerors 
of  England,  after  robbing  the  people  of  all  their  lands 
and  property,  passed  more  laws  and  adopted  more  rnur- 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  143 

derous  means  for  the  protection  of  the  right  of  possession  of 
property  than  were  ever  known  in  any  other  nation.  The 
monopoly  aristocracy  of  New-York  garrisoned  their  for- 
tresses with  arms  and  men,  and  in  a  few  days  they  had 
a  law  passed  for  their  protection  also,  by  Avhich  they  were 
placed  beyond  all  constitutional  or  moral  power,  and  per- 
mitted to  levy  on  the  community  another  robbery  of  four- 
teen per  cent,  under  the  designation,  below  par,  or  discount. 
When  any  of  the  masses  commit  depredations  on  the 
public,  such  terms  as  swindling, stealing,  robbery, burglary, 
picking-pockets,  felony,  are  used ;  but  when  the  gentle 
aristocracy  commit  depredations  producing  the  same  re- 
sults upon  the  sufferers,  the  gentle  terms  of  "  suspension," 
"discount,"  "breach  of  trust,"  "defalcations,"  "forgery," 
are  used.  When  a  blacksmith  at  his  forge  forges  a  plough- 
share, he  is  called  a  forger  to  distinguish  him  from  a  filer, 
who  is  also  a  blacksmith, but  works  at  a  vice-bench.  The 
forging  of  a  ploughshare  is  therefore  a  forgery ;  and  such 
terms  were  so  used  hundreds  of  years  before  the  term  was 
applied  to  the  criminal  imitation  of  signatures. 

On  the  third  day  of  the  run  upon  them  for  the  pay- 
ment of  their  obligations,  the  Banks  of  the  city  of  New- 
York  suspended  specie  payments,  but  they  did  not  sus- 
pend business.  The  safety  fund  league  sent  a  message 
to  the  Legislature  for  a  suspension  law,  and  it  was  obeyed 
forthwith.  But  what  could  be  the  necessity  for  the  pas- 
sage of  such  a  law  ?  It  was  but  a  few  days  before,  that 
the  Bank  investigating  committee,  of  which  Thomas  G. 
Talmage  was  chairman,  brought  in  a  report  of  the  condi- 
tion of  every  Bank  in  the  state,  to  each  of  which  one  or 
more  paragraphs  were  devoted,  and  each  was  pronounced 
"  in  good  condition"  "  well  conducted"  or  "  ably  con- 
ducted." All,  with  very  few  exceptions,  were  eulogized. 
Had  the  Legislature  no  faith  in  the  Report  of  the  select 
and  sworn  investigating  committee  ?  Or  was  the  As- 
sembly guilty  of  chicanery  in  the  getting  up  of  the  com- 
mittee to  make  a  report  for  political  effect  1  If  the  Le- 
gislature believed  the  Report  to  be  honest  and  true,  then 


144  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

it  was  bound  by  all  the  obligations  of  oath  of  office, 
public  spirit,  moral  duty  and  love  of  country  to  refuse  its 
sanction  to  the  suspension  of  specie  payments.  If  it  had 
doubts  of  the  correctness  of  the  Report,  it  should  have  or- 
dered another  investigation  before  it  passed  the  suspen- 
sion law,  for  nothing  but  necessity  could  palliate  such  a  law ; 
and  if  the  necessity  existed,  then  was  the  report  of  the 
investigating  committee  of  the  solvency,  good  condition, 
&c.  of  the  Banks  utterly  false.  If  the  Banks  were  "  well 
conducted"  "  in  good  condition"  and  exactly  according 
to  the  report  of  the  investigating  committee,  the  Legis- 
lature should  have  negatived  a  suspension  law  as  sternly 
as  it  would  a  bill  to  legalize  breach  of  trust,  fraud,  high- 
way robbery,  swindling  or  picking  of  pockets. 

Reader,  it  was  against  the  selection  of  this  select  Bank 
investigating  committee  that  Mr.  Jaques  and  others  sent 
in  a  memorial  to  the  house  of  Assembly,  and  it  was  (osten- 
sibly) for  requiring  their  expenses  to  be  defrayed  that 
Messrs.  Jaques  and  Slamm  were  pronounced  guilty  of 
"  wilful  contempt  of  the  house."  But  their  real  sin  was 
that  they  had  signed  their  names  to  a  document  of  trea- 
son against  Banks  and  bank  directors.  May  the  state 
of  New-York  never  have  such  another  bank-ridden  Le- 
gislature ! 

Before  the  end  of  the  month  of  May,  1837,  the  people 
of  the  United  States  had  a  universal  demonstration  that 
the  much  extolled  credit  system  was  in  reality  a  system 
of  debt.  How  it  ever  came  into  men's  heads  to  deem 
that  a  credit  system,  which  consisted  in  loaning  and  bor- 
rowing evidences  of  debt  is  perfectly  astonishing.  The 
monstrous  credit  system  of  England  has  grown  out  of  her 
enormous  national  debt,  which  must  some  time  or  other 
be  exploded  by  National  Bankruptcy  or  Revolution. 


CHAPTER    XI. 

Election  of  Officers  of  the  Party — Great  Park  meeting,  June  24th — 
Address  and  Resolutions — Course  of  the  President  of  the  United 
States  in  relation  to  the  Banks  and  Specie  Circular,  approved — A 
State  Convention  called — F.  A.  Tallmadge  censured  for  his  course 
in  the  State  Senate  on  the  Specie  Circular  and  Bank  Suspension 
law — Resolutions — Letter  from  Samuel  Young. 

"  Unqualified  and  uncompromising  hostility  to  bank  notes  and  paper  money.    Gold 
and  silver  is  the  only  Constitutional  currency." — Declaration  of  Rights. 

AT  the  General  County  Meeting  of  the  Equal  Rights 
party  on  the  5th  of  June,  a  treasurer  and  recording 
secretary  were  to  be  chosen  for  the  ensuing  six  months. 

M.  Jaques,  who  had  been  treasurer  from  the  first 
establishment  of  the  office,  had  removed  about  the  be- 
ginning of  May  to  his  farm  in  New  Jersey,  which  had 
undergone  improvements  to  render  it  suitable  as  a  resi- 
dence for  his  declining  years.  His  leaving  the  City,  was 
an  irreparable  loss  to  the  Equal  Rights  party.  Intrin- 
sically a  great  man,  had  he  devoted  himself  to  public 
life,  few  men  would  at  this  day  be  acknowledged  superior 
to  him.  Capable,  truthful,  and  thoroughly  democratic 
in  his  views,  such  men  as  he  and  only  such,  should  be  the 
leading  men  of  the  Democratic  party.  As  early  as  1832 
he  suggested  a  constitutional  Treasury  system.  Among 
those  to  whom  he  detailed  his  plans  he  wrote  to  C.  C. 
Cambreleng  on  the  subject. 

Daniel  Gorham  was  elected  Treasurer  to  succeed  M. 
Jaques.  And  Alexander  Ming  was  elected  Recording 
Secretary,  to  succeed  F.  Byrdsall,  who  declined  being  a 
candidate. 

The  resolution  to  remain  a  separate  and  distinct  party, 
passed  by  the  State  Convention  at  Utica,  was  re-affirmed 
and  re-adopted. 

Soon  after  this  meeting,  preparations  were  set  in  motion 
13 


146  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

for  another  Park  meeting  to  take  place  on  the  24th  June. 
The  bill  was  posted. 

PARK! 

The  oppressed,  and  the  foes  of  oppression,  and  all  who  are  opposed 
to  the  union  of  Bank  and  State,  and  the  Bank  suspension  law,  since 
the  passage  of  which  flour  lias  risen  $2.50  per  barrel.  All  who  are 
opposed  to  that  system  of  legislation,  which  enables  the  coiners  of 
Rag  money  to  live  in  pomp  and  luxury  on  the  industry  of  the  poor; 
all  who  are  in  favour  of  calling  a  state  convention  to  devise  means 
for  effecting  a  thorough  Reform  of  those  legalized  robberies  which 
deprive  the  laborer  of  his  bread,  are  invited  to  meet  in  the  Park  Mon- 
day afternoon  at  a  quarter  past  six  o'clock. 

DANIEL  GORHAM,  JOHN  HECKER, 

WARDEN  HAYWARD,      •       JOHN  BOGERT, 
WM.  J.  BAYARD,  JOHN  W.  BROWN, 

JOHN  WINDT. 

In  compliance  with  the  above  public  call,  the  "  largest 
concourse  ever  assembled  in  the  city  of  New-York  met  in 
the  Park  in  front  of  the  City  Hall,  for  the  purpose  of 
devising  means  for  a  thorough  reform  of  those  legislative 
robberies  which  are  depriving  the  laborer  of  bread." 
The  meeting  was  called  to  order  by  Morgan  L.  Smith. 
Robert  Townsend,  Jr.,  was  chosen  President,  and  the 
following  persons  Vice-Presidents : 

ISAAC  ODELL,  PASCAL  B.  SMITH, 

JOHX  HECKER,  THOMAS  DYER, 

JOHN  WILDER,  ROBERT  BE  ATT  v, 

B.  F.  HALLOCK,  HUGH  COLLINS, 

LUKE  FAY,  THOMAS  CHAPPLE, 

DANL.  GORHAM,  J.  W.  BROWN, 

HIRAM  TUPPER,  T.  S.  SECOR. 

Secretaries. 

JOHN  H.  HUNT,  FENELON  HASRROUCK, 

THOMAS  S.  DAY,  JOSEPHUS  N.  GRAIN. 

Mr.  E.  J.  Webb  rose  and  addressed  the  meeting  on  the  various 
topics  included  in  the  call.  His  remarks  were  listened  to  with  the 
greatest  earnestness  and  received  with  enthusiasm. 

The  following  address,  written  by  Mr.  Hunt,  was  then  read  by 
Alexander  Ming,  Jr.,  and  each  section  heartily  responded  to  by  the 
acclamations  and  cheers  of  the  assembled  multitude. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  14 

TO  THE  PEOPLE  OF  THE  STATE  OF  NEW-YOKK. 

FELLOW  CITIZENS: 

There  are  times  when  boldness  becomes  the  height  of  prudence. 
There  are  evils  which  cowardice  itself  might  prompt  men  to  oppose 
with  firm  determination  instead  of  temporizing  expedients.  Such  a 
time  is  the  present ;  such  the  evils  we  have  now  to  encounter. 

It  would  be  of  little  use  to  dwell  upon  the  extent  of  our  sufferings. 
It  is  enough  that  we  all  know  they  have  been  caused  by  a  general 
departure  from  the  immutable  principles  of  right,  and  that  they  can 
be  removed  only  by  a  return  to  those  great  principles  of  rectitude  and 
justice  which  society  has  so  long  abandoned. 

The  time  has  come  when  the  scattered,  disheartened  friends  of  na- 
tural right,  and  the  banded,  artful,  but  dastardly  upholders  of  legal- 
ized crime,  must  meet  in  open  conflict.  We  have  borne  the  load  of 
continually  accumulating  oppression  till  our  powers  of  endurance  are 
exhausted ;  and  we' -have  now  only  to  decide  whether  we  will  man- 
fully battle  with  our  wrongs,  or  sink  into  the  grave  beneath  their  in- 
tolerable burden. 

At  such  a  juncture,  the  friends  of  justice  have  a  right  to  claim  your 
most  active  friendship.  This  we  do  claim ;  and  we  pledge  our  own 
zealous  cooperation  in  return. 

The  first  step  towards  unity  of  action  must  be  unity  of  counsel. 
With  a  view  to  promote  such  unity,  we  propose  a  State  Convention, 
to  be  held  at  Utica  on  the  2d  Monday  of  September  next,  in  which 
each  county  shall  be  represented  by  twice  the  number  of  Delegates 
which  it  now  sends  to  the  Assembly ;  the  duty  of  which  convention 
shall  be,  to  devise  vigorous  measures  to  remove  not  only  those  evils, 
but  the  causes  of  those  evils,  under  which  we  have  so  long  suffered. 

Although  we  have  no  right  to  forestall  your  sentiments,  or  even  by 
implication  to  prescribe  the  measures  to  be  determined  on,  you  will 
naturally  expect  us  to  give  at  least  a  sketch  of  the  views  by  which 
we  are  actuated,  and  of  some  of  the  reforms  in  our  social  polity  which 
we  hope  may  be  adopted. 

That  revolution  to  which  our  republic  owes  its  birth  was  effected 
by  the  strenuous  efforts  of  a  comparative  few  of  the  honest  asserters  of 
the  rights  of  man,  aided  by  many  in  whom  the  impulses  of  vanity  or 
avarice  were  stronger  than  those  of  justice.  The  change  then  wrought 
was  rather  a  change  of  forms  than  a  change  of  system.  It  did  not 
destroy  the  vitality  of  the  system  of  laws  which  the  landed  aristocracy 
of  England  had  devised  for  the  government  of  their  rent-payers.  The 
change  then  wrought  was  based  on  compromise  rather  than  princi- 
ple ;  and  even  the  most  sanguine  of  the  patriots  of  that  age  professed 
to  have  done  little  more  than  to  devise  a  plan  by  which  their  descend- 
ants might,  when  the  country  should  have  recovered  its  exhausted 
energies,  and  when  the  public  mind  should  become  less  turbid  from 
the  agitations  of  a  long  civil  war,  establish  a  system  of  perfect  right 
without  resorting  to  violence. 

But  the  change  was  sufficient  to  arouse  the  people,  and  to  alarm 


148  HISTORY  OF  THE  [  1837. 

the  robbers  of  the  people,  in  the  old  world.  It  was  sufficient  to  prove 
one  great  exciting  cause  of  those  long  and  expensive  wars  which  so 
inflated  the  funding  and  paper  system  as  to  bring  the  lordly  usurers 
of  land  in  subjection  to  the  usurers  of  money,  and  which  laid  the  an- 
cient tyrannies  of  Europe  under  such  a  load  of  debt  that,  if  the  pro- 
phecy of  Daniel  be  true,  they  must  very  soon  fall  to  rise  no  more  for 
ever. 

The  disbanded  patriots  of  our  revolution  had  no  sooner  sought  that 
repose  which  their  toils  had  made  necessary,  than  the  pursuit  of  gain 
engrossed  the  energies  of  our  people,  transforming  us  into  a  nation  of 
speculators ;  and  from  that  time  to  the  present  no  country  on  earth 
has  been  more  completely  under  the  despotism  of  Mammon  than  this 
nominal  republic. 

The  spirit  of  traffic  is  of  all  others  most  incompatible  with  the 
spirit  of  liberty.  The  desire  to  buy  cheap  and  sell  dear,  to  take  much 
and  give  little,  whether  it  shows  itself  in  the  highwayman  or  the 
speculator,  is  equally  hostile  to  the  happiness  and  the  virtues  of  so- 
ciety; and  from  the  birth  of  Carthage  down  to  the  present  time,  the 
tendency  of  excessive  trade  has  been,-to  blend  the  pride  of  the  tyrant 
with  the  meanness  of  the  slave  in  each  individual  wherever  it  has 
been  suffered  to  predominate. 

It  ought  ever  to  be  borne  in  mind,  that  no  man  can  acquire  the 
doubtful  good  of  extreme  wealth  without  subjecting  others  to  the  un- 
doubted evil  of  poverty.  No  man  can  gain  the  whole  soil  of  a  district 
without  stripping  all  the  other  occupants  of  such  district  of  their 
right  to  the  soil;  nor  engross  any  portion  of  the  fruits  of  other  men's 
labor  without  subjecting  others  to  a  loss  equal  to  his  own  gain.  Hence, 
no  doubt,  the  severity  of  the  denunciations  pronounced  by  the  car- 
penter of  Nazareth  upon  the  engrossers  of  wealth ;  who  in  the  very 
nature  of  things,  ever  must  be  little  better  than  beasts  of  prey  lying 
in  wait  for  the  honest  laborers  of  society. 

It  is  necessary  that  we  should  advert  to  some  of  those  schemes 
which  have  been  devised  to  strip  the  laborer  of  his  earnings,  and 
which  we  are  anxious  to  annihilate. 

We  will  first  speak  of  the  fraud  of  a  spurious  currency.  The  legi- 
timate office  of  Money  is  to  regulate  the  dividends  of  the  great  part- 
nership of  society ;  to  secure  to  each  contributor  to  the  wealth  of  so- 
ciety, dividends  proportioned  to  the  extent  of  his  contributions. 
Money  enables  its  holder  to  take  wealth  or  labor  from  such  members 
of  the  body  politic  as  may  have  wealth  or  labor  to  part  with ;  and  no- 
thing can  be  more  just,  than  that  he  who  has  obtained  money  honestly, 
who  has  given  wealth  or  labor  to  society  for  the  money  he  owns, 
should  receive  wealth  or  labor  for  it  in  return.  But  our  reigning 
office-holders  have  for  years  been  in  the  practice  of  licensing  the 
caucuses  to  which  they  owed  their  elevation,  and  such  speculators  as 
would  pay  handsomely  for  the  privilege,  to  issue  strips  of  silk  paper 
as  money ;  and  for  these  strips  of  silk  paper  they  and  their  confederates 
have  been  allowed  to  engross  nearly  all  the  lands,  and  houses,  and 
wealth  of  the  state,  without  ever  having  contributed  the  value  of  a 
single  broom-stick  to  the  wealth  of  any  honest  man.  They  have  also 


1837.]  LOOO-FOGO  PARTY.  149 

drawn  interest  from  society  on  the  whole  amount  of  money  they 
owed  to  society.  They  and  their  confederates  have  thus  robbed 
nearly  the  whole  of  the  working  classes  of  all  the  fruits  of  their  in- 
dustry ;  and  we  must  now  decide  whether  they  shall  be  suffered  to 
continue  their  game,  or  to  retain  their  plunder. 

Our  present  laws  have  also  given  full  scope  to  that  great  curse  of 
the  human  race  formerly  called  "  usury "  or  "  increase/'  but  now 
better  known  by  the  terms  "  interest "  and  "  speculation."  This  mean 
mode  of  robbery,  the  nature  of  which  is  such  that  it  can  only  be  prac- 
tised by  the  possessors  of  wealth  against  the  poor  and  needy,  has 
proved  the  ruin  of  hundreds  of  empires,  and  received  the  attention  of 
the  best  and  earliest  lawgivers.  "  If  thy  brother  be  waxen  poor,  and 
fallen  in  decay  with  thee,  then  thou  shalt  relieve  him;  yea,  though  he 
be  a  stranger,  or  a  sojourner :  Take  thou  no  usury  of  him,  or  in- 
crease; but  fear  thy  God,  that  thy  brother  may  live  with  thee.  Thou 
shalt  not  give  him  thy  money  upon  usury,  nor  lend  him  thy  victuals 
upon  increase."  (Lev.  xxv.  36.)  Ezekiel  classes  the  usurer  with 
the  hired  assassin ;  the  Fathers  and  early  Councils  of  the  Christian 
Church  spoke  of  him  as  a  wrecker,  drawing  his  aliment  from  human 
misery  and  human  tears ;  and  for  more  than  a  thousand  years  usury 
was  reckoned,  throughout  Christendom,  not  less  criminal  than  any 
other  species  of  cannibalism.  Yet  has  this  sin  been  tolerated  to  such 
an  extent  among  us,  that  it  has  now  little  left  but  the  starved  car- 
case of  the  laborer  to  feed  upon ! 

Probably  the  best  mode  of  completely  destroying  both  the  curse  of 
paper  money  and  the  curse  of  usury  would  be,  simply  to  let  credit 
alone;  to  leave  each  man's  credit  to  stand  solely  on  its  own  bottom, 
without  any  attempt  to  strengthen  or  weaken  it  by  legislation;  and,  by 
our  constitution,  to  perpetually  prohibit  the  law  from  ever  interfering 
in  any  shape  with  any  contract  of  debt,  either  to  enforce  or  to  annul 
it.  This  measure  would  make  all  debts  contracted  after  its  adoption 
what  all  debts  should  be,  debts  of  honor.  It  would  prevent  the  man  of 
doubtful  honesty,  whatever  might  be  his  wealth,  from  obtaining  very 
extensive  credit ;  and  it  would  enable  the  honest  man,  however  poor, 
to  obtain  as  much  credit  as  he  ought.  It  would  subject  the  man  who 
should  be  guilty  of  trusting  a  speculator  or  knave  to  the  just  punish- 
ment of  losing  his  debt;  and  it  would  cause  a  single  dishonest  act  to 
blast  its  perpetrator's  credit  wherever  he  should  be  known.  T^he  be- 
neficial effects  of  s\ich  a  measure  will  appear  the  more  complete  and 
extensive  the  more  it  is  examined;  and  it  would  have  the  great  merit 
of  being  simple,  efficient,  and  just. 

A  reform  of  the  judiciary  system  would  naturally  engage  the  at- 
tention of  the  convention  we  propose.  If  our  judges  are  to  have  the 
power  of  drawing  their  decisions  from  an  interminable  fog-bank  of 
laws,  and  precedents,  and  dead  men's  opinions,  they  ought  to  be  made 
more  nearly  responsible  to  the  people  who  are  compelled  to  pay  their 
wages,  and  to  submit  to  all  their  decisions. 

The  practice  of  reserving  the  public  lands  for  the  benefit  of  specu- 
lators and  wild  beasts,  while  thousands  of  God's  children  have  not 
where  to  lay  their  heads ;  and  the  practice  of  stripping  every  poor 

13* 


150  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

man's  child  of  his  natural,  inalienable  right  to  a  share  of  the  boun- 
ties of  our  common  Father,  that  he  may  be  compelled  to  wear  out  a 
shortened  and  degraded  existence  in  the  service  of  sloth  and  luxury, 
are  subjects  that  should  at  this  time  be  considered  with  serious  atten- 
tion, and  acted  upon  with  deliberate  caution,  by  our  whole  people. 

It  would  be  both  inconvenient  and  unnecessary  to  advert  to  all  the 
subjects  that  might  be  submitted  to  the  consideration  of  the  proposed 
Convention.  What  we  ourselves  wish  is,  a  NEW  CONSTITU- 
TION, based  not  upon  compromise,  not  upon  any  narrow  views  of 
temporary  expediency,  but  upon  the  broad  and  eternal  basis  of 
RIGHT.  We  wish  Law  to  become  the  mere  echo  of  Conscience. 
We  wish  that  no  man  should  ever  hereafter  be  privileged  to  do  unto 
others  that  which  he  would  not  have  others  do  unto  him,  or  exact 
from  others  that  which  he  would  not  have  others  exact  from  him. 
And  this  is  all. 

However  unpalatable  the  truth  may  be  to  our  national  vanity,  it  is 
not  the  less  true  that  America  is  not  yet  a  republic.  Here,  as  else- 
where, Man  is  the  slave  of  Money.  "  Law  rules  the  poor,  and  Mo- 
ney rules  the  Law."  Lombard  street  and  its  precincts  in  London 
govern  Wall  street,  and  Wall  street  governs  our  legislative  lobbies. 
The  patronage  of  the  salesmen  of  British  goods,  of  those  who  retail 
the  wealth  extorted  from  the  British  laborer,  is  of  more  importance 
to  our  printers  and  lawyers  than  all  the  patronage  which  can  be  be- 
stowed on  them  by  all  our  farmers,  mechanics,  and  laborers  ;  conse- 
quently the  bar  and  the  press  are  greatly  under  the  malign  influence 
of  the  robbers  of  the  British  people  ;  and  they  cannot  side  with  the 
American  laborer  without  hazarding  their  bread.  The  Church,  once 
the  invincible  asserter  of  the  rights  of  man,  does  not  now  save  us 
from  usury  and  oppression.  Hence  the  necessity  of  the  step  we 
would  urge  upon  all  the  friends  of  honest  industry  among  our  fellow- 
citizens. 

From  what  we  have  already  said,  fellow-citizens,  you  will  readily 
see  why,  instead  of  approaching  any  minor  authority,  we  address 
ourselves  at  once  to  the  supreme  power  of  the  people — a  power  hav- 
ing an  unconditional  right  to  modify  and  amend  any  law  or  constitu- 
tion, at  any  time,  in  any  mode  they  may  deem  expedient.  We  can- 
not afford  to  waste  our  time  in  empty  formalities,  or  in  untying  law- 
yers' quibbles,  while  our  families  are  famishing  around  us.  If  the 
right  to  frame  or  amend  a  constitution  ever  existed,  it  must  exist 
now ;  if  it  was  ever  possessed  by  the  people,  they  must  possess  it 
still.  It  is  our  solemn  conviction  that  nothing  less  than  a  wise,  just, 
and  speedy  exercise  of  this  right  can  save  us  from  a  career  of  an- 
archy. It  is  idle  for  us  to  wait  for  the  action  of  those  state  authori- 
ties who  have  no  sympathy  for  the  people,  or  to  expect  relief  from 
the  hand  that  is  only  extended  to  scourge  us.  The  present  condition 
of  the  laboring  class  shows  more  strongly  than  words  how  much  we 
have  to  hope  from  their  Judas-like  friendship.  We  would  do  those 
men  who  are  in  the  habit  of  granting  charters  and  privileges  to  mo- 
nopolists in  the  name  of  the  people  no  injustice.  We  leave  it  to  God 
to  judge  them ;  but  we  must  also  leave  it  to  God's  antithesis  to  trust 
them. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  151 

In  conclusion,  fellow-citizens,  let  us  again  entreat  you  to  do  imme- 
diately what  is  now  no  less  a  work  of  necessity  than  of  duty.  Let 
your  representation  in  the  proposed  Convention  be  complete ;  let  it 
be  composed  of  honest  men  ;  let  such  reforms  as  JUSTICE  shall  dictate 
be  submitted  to  the  decision  of  the  whole  people  ;  and  then  let  us  de- 
termine by  our  votes  whether  the  laborer  of  this  once  free  land  shall 
be  suffered  to  maintain  the  dignity  of  a  man,  or  be  forced  to  wear  out 
his  existence  in  base  subserviency  to  the  drone,  and  end  it  by  the 
slow  tortures  of  hunger. 

At  the  close  of  the  Address,  and  after  the  cheers  of  the  meeting 
had  subsided,  Mr.  Henry  E.  Riell  read  the  following 

RESOLUTIONS. 

Whereas,  "  the  greatest  good  of  the  greatest  number  for  the  longest 
time,"  is  the  true  end  of  all  good  government ;  and  whereas  "  the 
blessings  of  government,  like  the  dews  of  heaven,  should  descend 
equally  upon  the  poor  and  the  rich;"  and  whereas  a  disordered  cur- 
rency (inseparable  from  the  present  system  of  banking  or  the  issue  of 
"  paper  money")  is  one  of  the  greatest  of  political  evils,  as  it  under- 
mines the  virtues  necessary  for  the  support  of  the  social  system,  wars 
against  industry  and  economy,  and  fosters  the  evil  spirit  of  specula- 
tion and  extravagance ;  and  whereas  few  evils  to  which  our  people 
are  subject  can  equal  those  inflicted  on  the  mass  of  the  community 
by  a  fraudulent  currency,  as  our  own  brief  history  as  a  nation  fully 
proves  ;  and  whereas,  in  all  the  revulsions  inseparable  from  a  paper 
currency,  the  classes  whose  labor  produces  all  the  real  wealth  of  the 
country  are  by  far  the  greatest  sufferers,  as  when  the  currency  ex- 
pands, the  loaf  contracts, — and  when  the  currency  contracts,  the  la- 
borer is  thrown  out  of  employment  and  the  loaf  disappears ;  and 
whereas  thousands  of  the  useful  classes  are  now  deprived  of  their 
bread  by  the  explosion  of  the  "  Safety  Fund"  system  of  this  state, 
and  the  universal  bankruptcy  of  the  banks;  and  whereas,  as  mutual 
protection  being  the  first  principle,  and  mutual  happiness  the  end  of 
the  social  compact,  laws  to  be  just  should  be  equal  in  their  opera- 
tion on  all  class(  s  of  the  community  :  Therefore, 

Resolved,  That  we  hold  the  present  banking  system  to  be  a  system 
at  war  with  the  first  principles  of  the  social  compact,  destructive  of 
the  best  interests  of  society,  treason  against  the  constitution,  and 
productive  of  more  crime  and  misery  than  all  other  causes  combined. 

Resolved,  That  the  incorporation  of  a  National  Bank,  or  of  any 
other  bank,  or  set  of  banks,  is  not  the  proper  remedy  for  the  evils  of 
the  present  paper  money  system. 

Resolved,  That  we  approve  of  the  conduct  of  the  President  of  the 
United  States  in  his  adhesion  to  the  law  requiring  payments  of  the 
revenue  in  specie,  and  that  we  will  support  him  «i  his  pledged  and 
uncompromising  hostility  to  paper  money  as  a  circulating  medium. 

Resolved,  That  we  consider  all  connec^on  between  Bank  and 
State  to  be  not  only  unconstitutional,  bat  anti-republican  ;  and  that 
we  recommend  to  the  administration  to  adopt  all  proper  means  within 
their  power  to  dissolve  that  connection. 


152  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

Resolved,  That  we  consider  the  late  Bank  Suspension  act  to  be  not 
only  a  palpable  violation  of  those  clauses  of  the  United  States  Con- 
stitution forbidding  the  passage  of  ex  post  facto  laws  and  of  laws 
impairing  the  obligations  of  contracts,  but  a  fraud  on  the  honest  part 
of  the  community  for  the  benefit  of  the  dishonest,  and  that  we  look 
upon  all  those  legislators  who  voted  for  it,  as  well  as  the  Governor 
who  signed  it,  as  guilty  of  a  violation  of  their  oath  to  support  the 
Constitution  of  the  United  States. 

Resolved,  That  a  copy  of  the  proceedings  of  this  meeting  be  trans- 
mitted  to  the  Governor,  with  the  request  that  he  will  immediately 
convene  the  Legislature  to  repeal  an  act  equally  subversive  of  the 
best  interests  of  the  State  and  of  the  Constitution. 

Resolved,  That  a  STATE  CONVENTION  be  held  in  the  city  of 
Utica,  on  the  second  Monday  of  September  next,  to  consist  of  a  num- 
ber of  delegates  not  to  exceed  double  the  number  of  members  of  the 
House  of  Assembly. 

%*  All  communications  relating  to  the  proposed  Convention  may 
be  addressed  to  « F.  Byrdsall,  100  Grand-st.,  New-York,'  who  is 
Chairman  of  our  Committee  of  Correspondence." 

In  all  the  ward  meetings  of  the  Equal  Rights  party, 
the  policy  of  the  President  of  the  United  States,  in  rela- 
tion to  the  banks  and  the  specie  circular,  was  unanimously 
approved,  while  the  course  of  the  State  Legislature  and 
Executive  was  unanimously  condemned,  in  relation  to 
the  Suspension  Law. 

During  the  months  of  April,  May  and  June,  a  county 
convention  had  been  holding  its  sessions  for  the  purpose 
of  altering  or  amending  the  constitution  of  organization. 
Early  in  July,  the  convention  presented  to  the  considera- 
tion of  the  General  County  Meeting,  the  result  of  its 
labors.  The  alterations  and  amendments  were  so  un- 
important, that  it  is  only  necessary  to  remark  here  that 
4hey  were  adopted. 

On  the  18th  of  July,  the  committee  appointed  to  cor- 
respond with  F.  Jl.  Tallmadge,  in  relation  to  his  course 
respecting  the  specie  circular  and  Bank  Suspension  Law, 
reported  progress.  Mr.  Tallmadge  had  signed  the  decla- 
ration of  Principles,  the  fourth  article  of  which  says, 
"  Unqualified  and  uncompromising  hostility  to  bank  notes 
and  paper  money,  because  gold  and  silver  is  the  only 
constitutional  currency." 

To  this  article  he  never  expressed  any  objection  when 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  153 

he  signed  the  Declaration.  It  was  also  well  known,  that 
the  Loco-Focos  were  unanimously  in  favor  of  specie  being 
paid  for  the  public  lands. 

The  following  preamble  and  resolutions  were  offered 
by  Capt.  John  Bogert,  and  with  the  single  exception  of 
one  negative  vote,  they  were  adopted. 

"  Whereas,  Frederick  Jl.  Tallmadge,  now  a  representative  of  the 
city  and  county  of  New- York  in  the  Senate  of  this  State,  was  the  candi- 
date of  the  Equal  Rights  party,  and  pledged  to  support  their  princi- 
ples in  relation  to  the  Constitution.il  Currency  : 

And  whereas,  the  said  Frederick  A.  Tallmadge,  by  introducing 
and  advocating  the  preamble  and  resolutions  in  favor  of  rescinding 
the  Specie  Circular,  as  well  as  by  voting  in  favor  of  the  Bank  Sus- 
pension Law,  has  violated  the  Declaration  of  principles  signed  by 
him,  and  the  solemn  promise  given  by  him  to  us,  his  constituents. 
Therefore— 

Resolved,  That  we  pronounce  him  false  to  his  political  engage- 
ments, recreant  to  the  true  interests  of  the  people,  and  unworthy  the 
confidence  of  honorable  men. 

Resolved,  That  a  committee  of  five  persons  be  appointed  to  furnish 
him  with  a  copy  of  the  above  proceedings,  and  request  him  to  resign 
his  seat  in  the  Senate  of  this  State." 

The  committee  chosen  pursuant  to  these  resolutions, 
reported  at  a  subsequent  meeting,  that  they  had  waited 
personally  on  Mr.  Tallmadge  with  the  resolutions  of 
censure  passed  against  him.  That  he  had  promised  a  for- 
mal answer,  but  that  none  was  yet  received. 

It  does  not  appear  by  any  record,  written  document,  or 
tradition  of  the  Equal  Rights  party,  that  he  ever  per- 
formed even  this  promise  of  a  formal  answer  to  the  party. 
But  he  must  be  spared,  for  the  sacred  robe  of  justice  is 
around  him,  and  its  sword  and  balance  are  in  his  hands ; 
at  all  events,  the  office  which  he  holds  is  honorable. 

The  chairman  of  the  corresponding  committee  respect- 
ing the  State  Convention  to  be  holden  at  Utica,  on  the 
second  Monday  in  September,  wrote  to  the  central  com- 
mittee appointed  by  the  former  Convention,  and  received 
satisfactory  answers.  He  also  corresponded  with  several 
individuals,  and  among  other  letters,  he  received  the  fol- 
lowing one  from  Samuel  Young.  It  was  enthusiastically 
applauded.  The  reader  will  find  it  worthy  of  perusal. 


154  HISTORY    OF    THE  [1837. 

"Ballstan,  8th  August,  1837. 

"  DEAR  SIR — I  received  a  few  days  since  yours  of  the  1st  inst.,  in 
which  you  state  tnat  you  have  been  solicited,  by  several  individuals, 
to  ask  for  my  co-operation  in  the  proposed  State  Convention  to  be 
held  at  Utica,  in  September  next,  in  pursuance  of  the  recommenda- 
tion of  a  large  public  meeting  in  the  city  of  New-York  in  June  last. 
I  have  no  objection  to  express  my  opinion  freely  on  the  topics  pro- 
posed to  be  discussed  by  the  Convention. 

"  Indeed,  my  opinions  on  the  subject  of  irredeemable  paper  pro- 
mises, on  monopolies  in  general,  and  on  the  exclusive  and  pernicious 
system  of  banking  in  this  State,  have  been  publicly  expressed ;  and 
so  far  from  changing  or  modifying  these  opinions,  the  events  of  the 
last  six  months  have,  to  my  mind,  afforded  '  confirmation  strong  as 
proofs  from  holy  writ.'  Every  public  meeting,  every  deliberative 
assembly  of  the  people,  either  aggregately  or  by  delegates,  to  discuss 
these  topics  in  a  firm  and  temperate  manner,  to  exhibit  the  system  of 
exclusion  in  its  unmitigated  deformity,  and  to  portray  the  value  and 
justice  of  equal  laws,  is  calculated  to  have  a  beneficial  effect  upon 
the  community.  And  in  the  hope  that  the  Convention  at  Utica  will 
be  thus  conducted,  I  fully  approve  of  its  convocation. 

"  It  ought  not  to  be  expected  that  a  divorce  between  Bank  and 
State,  whose  meretricious  connection  for  so  many  years  has  given 
birth  to  a  numerous  and  noisy  progeny,  can  be  effected  without  a 
protracted  struggle.  The  contest  of  the  few,  aided  by  their  wealth, 
influence,  and  presses,  against  the  many,  would  be  hopeless  in  any 
other  country  than  this :  and  its  result  here  at  present,  is  at  least 
problematical. 

"  The  bank  disease  has  been  slowly  and  insidiously  creeping  upon 
the  body  politic  for  many  years,  like  a  chronic  malady  upon  the  human 
frame.  The  patient  requires  gentle  and  careful  treatment,  and 
should  not  be  alarmed  and  exhausted  by  violent  prescriptions  and 
doses.  Alterative  remedies  are  the  best. 

"  There  is  always  a  portion  of  the  community  who  are  startled  at 
the  idea  of  any  material  change  in  existing  laws  or  institutions.  The 
mass  of  the  Tories  of  the  Revolution  doubtless  honestly  felt  this 
alarm,  and  therefore  adhered  to  the  old  system  of  injustice  and  op- 
pression. Many  of  the  self-styled  Whigs  of  the  present  day  have  the 
same  feeling  on  the  monopoly  question.  Aided  by  the  '  monopoly 
democrats/  (if  words  so  antagonistic  may  be  placed  in  juxtaposition), 
the  Bank  party  in  this  State  is  truly  formidable.  They  have  not 
only  a  fund  of  wealth,  but  also  a  large  surplus  of  contumelious  epi- 
thets, which  they  discount  with  great  liberality.  Their  opponents 
are  agitators,  radicals,  Loco-Focos,  &c. ;  and  these,  to  weak  nerves, 
are  startling  words. 

"  Two  years  ago  '  the  banking  system '  of  this  State  was  lauded  as 
the  sum -num.  bonum  of  human  invention  ;  and  six  or  seven  millions 
was  a  Mod  to  its  capital.  Last  winter  the  note  was  varied,  and  '  the 
safety  fund  system '  Was  the  object  of  eulogy.  And  when  about  a 
month  before  the  explosion,  I  confidently  predicted  the  catastrophe, 
I  was  regarded  with  superstitious  horror  as  the  hardened  perpetrator 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  155 

of  bank  blasphemy.  Since  the  explosion  the  note  has  been  again 
changed,  and  it  is  now  '  the  credit  system.'  Thus,  the  minim  first 
dwindled  to  a  crotchet,  and  is  now  only  a  quaver. 

"  According  to  Locke,  men  may  use  such  terms  or  signs  to  convey 
their  ideas  as  they  please ;  but  they  are  bound  to  give  clear  defini- 
tions of  these  signs.  I  have  long  looked  and  listened  in  vain  for 
some  definite  explanation  of  <  credit  system/  Credit  is  the  offspring 
of  the  individual  confidence  which  man  reposes  in  his  fellow-man. 
It  results  from  the  security  which  one  individual  feels  in  the  integrity 
and  ability  of  another.  Like  love,  joy,  hope,  faith,  confidence,  &c., 
it  is  an  emotion  of  the  heart  which  was  bestowed  upon  man  for  bene- 
ficial purposes,  and  can  be  well  regulated  only  by  individual  impulse 
and  direction.  Legislation  cannot  create,  but  may  mar  and  destroy 
it.  If  Government  should  institute  monopolies  to  make  discounts  of 
love  and  matrimony,  these  commodities  would  soon  become  as  spu- 
rious and  as  much  below  par  as  the  bills  of  the  broken  banks.  The 
late  explosion  of  the  banking  system  is  an  eminent  example  of  the 
extent  to  which  the  misdirected  framers  of  human  government  in  the 
creation  of  rnonied  monopolies  may  paralyze  and  extinguish  indi- 
vidual credit  and  confidence. 

"  The  principle  of  free  competition  which  was  implanted  in  man 
by  his  maker,  is  the  only  sure  and  safe  regulator  of  all  the  business 
purposes  and  pecuniary  transactions  of  human  society.  But  the 
RedheiSers  of  legislation  have  pronounced  the  great  Architect  to  be 
a  bungler,  and  have  essayed  to  better  the  movements  of  the  machine- 
ry, by  applying  to  the  community  the  strait  jacket  of  restraining  and 
usury  laws,  and  the  complex  tourniquet  of  the  'safety  fund'  and 
*  credit  system.'  Demoralisation,  oppression,  taxation,  fraud,  per- 
jury, and  failure,  ever  have  been,  and  ever  will  be  the  result,  until 
mankind  shall  acquire  sufficient  strength  and  confidence  in  them- 
selves to  tear  off  these  shackles. 

"  It  has  been  asserted  that  to  l  the  credit  system }  'this  country  is 
indebted  for  the  progress  of  improvement  and  the  increase  of  wealth. 
I  have  never  seen  any  attempt  to  prove  the  correctness  of  this  bold 
assertion.  God  ordained  that  man  should  procure  his  bread  by  the 
sweat  of  his  brow.  And  since  this  decree  went  forth,  not  one  item 
in  the  vast  catalogue  of  physical  objects  which  enter  into  the  defini- 
tion of  wealth,  and  which  are  calculated  to  gratify  human  wants  and 
desires,  was  ever  produced  except  by  labor.  Productive  labor  is  the 
sole  author  of  wealth  and  of  every  physical  improvement,  either  in 
the  solitary  or  social  condition  of  man. 

"Pecuniary  capital,  in  the  hands  of  industry  and  enteiprife,  is  an 
efficient  coadjutor  in  the  production  of  wealth;  and  so  is  the  hammer, 
the  plow,  and  the  steam-engine.  To  the  extent  thatf  credit  produces 
a  more  equal  and  useful  distribution  of  capital,  it  is  beneficial  to 
society,  and  no  farther.  Its  general  utility  is  circumscribed  within 
these  limits.  But  the  eulogists  of  f  the  credit  system  '  do  not  conde- 
scend to  bestow  any  notice  whatever  upon  capital. 

"  A  very  correct  idea  of  the  wealth-creating  framers  of  a  '  credit 
system '  was  conveyed  by  the  father  of  two  sons,  who  boasted  that  his 
boys  possessed  a  wonderful  tact  for  trading  and  getting  rich ;  and  he 


156  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

offered  to  bet  that  if  locked  in  a  room  together  for  a  single  day,  they 
would  make  five  dollars  a  piece  by  swapping  jackets.  The  notes  of 
each  other  for  five  dollars,  and  the  nett  gain  of  this  process  after 
balancing  the  account,  afford  a  fine  illustration  of  the  credit  system. 

"  Seduced  by  the  multiplication  of  bank  paper  promises,  a  consider- 
able portion  of  the  community  for  the  last  two  or  three  years  has 
been  earnestly  occupied  in  swapping  jackets.  Many  in  a  short  time 
grew  very  wealthy ;  but  unfortunately  for  '  the  credit  system,'  most 
of  the  rich  men  of  1836,  early  in  the  spring  of  1837,  awoke,  like 
Dives,  in  torment, 

"  If  the  mischief  had  fallen  only  on  the  harpies  of  speculation, 
there  would  have  been  no  qause  of  sympathy  or  complaint ;  but  the 
visitation  of  the  effects  of  bad  laws  falls  like  a  general  curse  upon  the 
whole  community.  Although  the  denunciations  against  gold  and 
silver  as  a  (  humbug; '  are  not  quite  so  vociferous  as  they  were  before 
the  explosion,  yet  in  spite  of  recent  experience,  the  swap-jacket,  or 
'  credit  system '  party  is  active  and  numerous. 

"  Every  one  knows  that  gold  and  silver  are  the  only  standard  of 
value,  by  the  universal  consent  of  mankind ;  and  that  they  are  pro- 
cured by  individbkals  and  nations  in  exact  proportion  to  the  applica- 
tion of  productive  labor  and  of  economy.  But  the  disciples  of  '  the 
credit  system '  roundly  uflirm  that  there  is  not  in  the  world  enough 
of  the  precious  metals  for  the  use  of  mankind.  The  established 
bushel  is  not  large  enough !  According  to  their  theory,  God  has 
committed  a  mistake  in  not  creating  a  sufficient  quantity  of  gold  and 
silver :  and  they  modestly  propose  to  rectify  his  error,  by  substituting 
the  treacherous  promises  of  bank  monopolies,  lately  denominated 
*the  credit  system.' 

"  In  every  age  individuals  have  been  found  who  were  intent  on 
eating  the  bread,  and  appropriating  the  wealth  which  had  been 
acquired  by  the  sweat  of  others ;  and  in  every  age  they  have  suc- 
ceeded in  their  object,  sometimes  by  violence,  and  often  by  fraud  and 
cunning.  I  will  not  assume  or  suppose  that  the  great  mass  of  the 
advocates  of '  the  credit  system '  are  influenced  by  such  motives ;  but 
if  the  system  is  not  calculated  to  tax  the  many  for  the  benefit  of  the 
few,  then  I  have  misconceived  its  operation. 

«  Very  respectfully,  yours,  &c,  S.  YOUNG." 


CHAPTER    XII. 

Recapitulatory  Remarks  on  the  position  of  the  General  and  State 
Administrations — Monopoly  Conspiracy  against  the  President,  de- 
veloped by  a  Letter  to  N.  P.  Tallmadge — Political  Dilemma — Mes- 
sage of  the  Special  Session — Strictures  on  the  Inconsistencies  of 
the  Monopolists  towards  "  New- York's  favorite  son5' — The  Loco- 
Focos  sustain  his  course — Demonstrations — State  Convention 
at  Utica  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party — New  Constitution  for  the 
State — Extracts — Address  to  the  People — Remarks. 

"  The  ground  we  take,  is,  the  utter  separation  of  Bank  and  State,  and  the  absolute 
emancipation  of  trade."  LEGGETT. 

THE  events  of  the  summer  of  1837  produced  a  crisis  of 
fearful  danger  to  the  union  of  the  Democratic  Republican 
party.  1  he  suspension  of  specie  payments,  followed  by 
the  act  of  the  Legislature  of  the  State  of  New-York  le- 
galizing the  suspension,  indicated  plainly,  that  the  banks 
and  state  governments  were  one  in  unity  of  financial  and 
political  action.  On  the  other  hand,  the  course  of  the 
administration  of  the  general  government,  in  maintain- 
ing the  specie  circular,  and  refusing  the  notes  of  the  sus- 
pended banks  in  payment  of  the  national  revenue,  placed 
the  Democratic  government  of  the  State,  and  the  Demo- 
cratic administration  of  the  United  States,  in  the  attitude 
of  contrariety  to  each  other.  A  conflict  of  interests  and 
sentiments  ensued,  which  agitated  the  party,  and  threw 
it  into  indescribable  confusion. 

At  length  a  movement  was  made  by  certain  monopoly 
Democrats,  which  could  only  have  proceeded  from  a  pre- 
concerted conspiracy  against  the  President.  The  object 
of  this  sinister  movement,  was  to  commit  a  large  portion 
of  the  Republican  party  so  decidedly  in  favor  of  the 
banking  system  of  the  State,  that  if  it  did  not  deter  the 
National  Executive  from  the  course  he  had  indicated,  it 
would  place  all  those  who  were  lured  into  the  move- 
ment, in  such  a  position  with  regard  to  the  President, 
14 


158  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

that  they  could  not  recede  without  in  some  way  dishonor- 
ing themselves.  To  this  end,  a  letter  was  framed  in  the 
style  of  a  manifesto  in  defence  of  the  "  credit  system," 
addressed  to  JV.  P.  Tallmadge,  Senator  of  the  United 
States,  from  the  State  of  New-York.  The  signers  of 
this  declaration,  (who  were  formerly  much  opposed  to 
pledges),  now  pledge  themselves  "  to  sustain  the  well 
regulated  credit  system."  Their  manifesto  in  its  entire 
absolutism  declared,  "  we  are  in  favor  of  the  credit  system, 
and  opposed  to  the  chimerical  scheme  of  an  exclusive 
metallic  currency."  In  its  mandatory  terms  it  dictated, 
"  Preserve  and  regulate,  but  not  destroy."  And  in  order 
to  invoke  the  Democracy,  it  proclaimed,  that  "  the  credit 
system  was  the  distinguishing  feature  between  despotism 
and  liberty." 

The  letter  is  subjoined  with  the  names  of  the  most 
politically  known  signers  to  it. 

«  To  the  Honorable  Nathaniel  P.  Tallmadge,  Senator  U.  S. : 

NEW-YORK,  July  4th,  1837. 

SIK — We,  the  undersigned  members  of  the  Democratic  Republican 
party  in  the  city  of  New- York,  have  seen,  with  pride  and  pleasure, 
your  letter  to  the  Editor  of  the  Albany  Argus  of  6th  June  last. 

We  consider  it  due  to  you,  and  more  especially  to  our  beloved 
country,  that  we  should  express  our  entire  approbation  of  the  senti- 
ments so  laudably  put  forth  in  your  letter.  Your  words  are,  '  I  am 
in  favor  of  a  well-regulated  credit  system,  and  opposed  to  the  chi- 
merical scheme  of  an  exclusive  metallic  currency,' — 'Preserve  and 
regulate,  but  not  destroy,5 — '  The  credit  system  is  the  distinguishing 
feature  between  despotism  and  liberty.' 

In  these  high  and  patriotic  views  we  heartily  concur,  and  assure 
you  that  we  believe  them  to  be  the  sentiments  of  a  great  majority  of 
the  Republican  party ;  and  we  cordially  tender  you  our  unanimous 
support,  in  the  proper  efforts  to  sustain  and  establish  these  principles 
in  the  Legislature  of  this  great  and  enterprising  nation. 

Accept  the  assurances  of  our  high  consideration  and  respect. 

J.  Hammond,  John  J.  Cisco,  C.  C.  Jacobus, 

Henry  Wyckofi,  J.  L.  Graham,  J.  V.  Greenfield, 

Thos.  Jeremiah,  E.  G.  Stacy,  Reuben  Withers, 

M.  M.  Quackenboss,  Gideon  Lee,  Daniel  Jackson, 

James  B.  Douglass,  George  D.  Strong,  A.  B.  Vanderpoel, 

Joseph  Meeks,  H.  W.  Bonnell,  James  Ferris, 

Robert  Smith,  Edward  Sandford,  Thos.  S.  Brady, 

Jchabod  Prall,  E.  W.  Nicholls,  John  Pettigrew, 


1837.] 


LOCO-FOCO  PARTY. 


159 


John  W.  Degraw, 
Garrit  Gilbert, 
Jesse  West, 
Samuel  Swartwout, 
Charles  H.  Hall, 

C.  S.  Delavan, 
Henry  Erben, 
J.  D.  Stevenson, 
Lawrence  Akerman, 
Enoch  Dean, 
Benjamin  Ringgold, 
Peter  Pinckney, 
Thos.  G.  Talmage, 
Henry  Keyser, 
William  H.  Bunn, 

D.  M.  Cowdry, 
Jonas  Conklin, 
Willis  Phillips, 
Alfred  Colville, 


Daniel  McGrath, 
M.  L.  Smith, 
J.  D.  Beers, 
Andrew  Jackson, 
Abm.  Le  Toy, 
Richard  Riker, 
P.  M.  Wetmore, 
Cors.  N.  Bryson, 
J.  B.  Schmelzel, 
O.  M.  Lowndes, 
Benjamin  Byrdsall, 
John  Foot, 
Hector  Craig, 
Preserved  Fish, 
John  R.  Peters, 
Jas.  N.  Tuttle, 
R.  C-  Townsend, 
Burr  Wakeman, 
Andrew  Lockwood, 
Charles  Dusenbury." 


Chas.  O'Connor, 
Alfred  A.  Smith, 
John  Kurtz, 
George  Paulding, 
Henry  Storms, 
James  C.  Stoneall, 
Ezra  S.  Conner, 
William  Kelly, 
Chas.  Del  Vecchio, 
Jas.  R.  Whiting, 
J.  I.  Bedient, 
Thos.  N.  Carr, 
J.  I.  Earl, 
D.  Vandervoort, 
H.  W.  Hicks, 
James  L.  Graham, 
William  Wyckoff, 
Farnham  Ball, 
J.  H.  Cornell, 


To  this  belligerent  missive,  there  were  nearly  seven 
hundred  names,  including  a  majority  of  the  Old  Men's 
General  Committee,  (over  two  thirds),  and  seventy  odd 
Democrats,  directors  in  banks,  insurance  and  railroad 
companies.  This  political  letter,  with  its  great  array  of 
names  of  "  old  tried  Democrats,"  was  a  sore  perplexity 
to  many  of  the  rank  and  file,  or  main  body  of  the  Repub- 
lican party.  They  had  been  in  the  habit  of  voting  the 
regular  nominations  in  favor  of  "  Banks  to  supply  the 
business  wants  of  the  community,"  and  New-York's  fa- 
vorite son  also ;  but  now,  to  be  obliged  to  separate  the 
one  from  the  other,  was  like  tearing  half  their  hearts  from 
them.  Most  of  them  had  derived  their  political,  in  the 
same  way  that  they  had  their  religious  bias,  from  their 
early  associations  in  life,  and  were  willing  to  go  all  lengths 
for  both,  without  knowing  much  of  the  peculiar  princi- 
ples of  either. 

But,  when  the  message  of  the  President  to  the  special 
session  of  Congress  made  its  appearance,  hostilities  com- 
menced within  the  Party.  The  "  ninety-seven  banks  of 
the  state"  entered  the  political  arena  and  exercised  their 
influences.  Their  partizans  denounced  the  Independent 


160  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1835. 

Treasury  plan,  as  a  union  of  the  purse  and  the  sword,  and 
such  was  the  fatuity  which  prevailed,  that  millions  ot 
people  could  not,  or  did  not,  see  that  in  the  financial  con- 
nection which  had  existed  between  the  treasury  depart- 
ment and  the  banks,  there  was  a  union  of  the  purse  and 
the  sword,  more  powerful,  pervading,  and  dangerous  to 
liberty  than  the  plan  for  receiving  and  disbursing  the 
revenue  proposed  by  the  President.  But,  after  all,  the 
outcry  of  the  purse  and  the  sword  was  only  raised  for 
popular  effect ;  for  the  men  that  raised  it,  had  far  more 
regard  for  self-interest,  speculations,  and  stocks,  than  they 
had  for  abstract  principles  of  right,  or  democratic  liberty. 
Even  the  champions  of  the  "  great  measure  of  Mr.  Van 
Buren's  administration,"  endeavored  to  show  that  it  would 
be  advantageous  to  bank  and  mercantile  interests.  Such 
was  the  deference  paid  to  the  incorporated  sovereignty  of 
banks. 

The  amount  of  depredations  in  various  ways  commit- 
ted by  the  banks  of  the  United  States  upon  the  people, 
far  exceed  what  any  invading  army  could  have  perpe- 
trated, so  far  as  property  is  considered  only.  But  they 
were  sovereign  and  could  do  no  wrong :  the  law-making 
power  always  sanctioned  their  absolute  will.  The  "  old 
tried  dimmycrats  loved  them  with  all  their  faults,  "  and 
were  ready  to  abandon  New-York's  favorite  son,  "  our 
own  little  Matty  Van  Buren."  They  would  not  see  that  it 
was  the  suspension  which  compelled  him  to  take  the 
course  which  he  did.  They  cried  aloud,  "  Preserve  and 
regulate,  but  don't  destroy  ! "  The  banks  had  afforded 
every  facility  to  speculators,  and  forestalled  of  the  neces- 
saries of  life,  but  "  the  credit  system  is  the  distinguishing 
feature  between  despotism  and  liberty."  When  their 
notes  got  at  fourteen  per  cent  below  the  constitutional 
standard,  such  a  discount  on  the  revenue  was  not  to  be 
borne,  but  the  "  old-fashioned  dimmycrats"  were  in  favor 
of  "  the  well-regulated  credit  system." 

The  President,  consistently  with  the  "  unqualified  un- 
compromising hostility  to  a  national  bank,"  avowed  by 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  161 

himself  and  the  Republican  party,  had  no  other  alterna- 
tive but  that  which  the  suspension  of  specie  payments 
forced  upon  him,  the  necessity  of  conducting  the  financial 
department  of  the  government,  without  any  connection 
with  banking  institutions.  Yet  some  of  those  who  forced 
this  alternative  upon  him,  accused  him  of  an  ungrateful 
return  for  their  political  patronage  of  him  in  "  early  days 
of  little  promise."  They  expected  that  he  would  subserve 
their  interests  rather  than  the  people's.  The  banks  be- 
came adverse  to  him  without  just  cause,  for  he  never  was 
opposed  to  them.  But  recently,  in  1836,  in  his  letter  to 
Sherrod  Williams,  he  had  said  that  he  "  would  not  only 
protect  the  banks  in  the  privileges  which  had  been  granted 
to  them,  but  he  would  also  extend  to  them  the  good  will 
of  the  community."  Even  in  1841,  in  a  letter  which  he 
wrote  in  reply  to  Governor  Reynolds  and  the  legislature 
of  Missouri,  he  bestowed  high  commendations  on  that 
state  for  having  "  a  mixed  currency,  composed  of  a  well- 
balanced  and  harmonious  co-operation  of  the  standard  of 
value  and  its  paper  representative."  It  has  been  said, 
that  incorporated  bodies  have  no  souls ;  but  we  add,  as 
much  more  true,  that  the  war  of  the  banks  against  Mr. 
Van  Buren  conclusively  shows  that  they  had  no  con- 
sciences. 

The  message  of  the  September  session,  was  at  once  ap- 
proved by  the  Equal  Rights  Party.  It  appears  by  their 
recorded  proceedings  that  a  special  county  meeting  was 
called,  Sept.  7th,  at  which  "  spirited  resolutions  approba- 
tory of  the  late  message  of  President  Van  Bur  en-were 
offered  by  F.  Byrdsall,  which  were  enthusiastically  re- 
ceived and  applauded."  Alexander  Ming,  Jr.,  also 
offered  resolutions,  from  which  the  following  is  selected  : 

"  Resolved,  That  the  Message  delivered  by  Martin  Van  Buren,  to 
the  present  25th  Congress  of  the  United  States,  for  its  able  and  con- 
vincing arguments,  and  for  its  cogent,  equitable,  and  constitutional 
objections  to  a  National  Bank,  and  for  its  clear,  just,  and  practicable 
recommendation  of  dispensing  with  State  Banks  as  fiscal  agents,  and 
the  adoption  of  a  governmental  system  of  finance,  predicated  exclu- 
sively on  the  constitutional  currency — gold  and  silver — awakens  the 
14* 


162  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

admiration,  and  deserves  the  applause  of  every  friend  of  Equal 
Rights,  and  will  elicit  the  approbation  of  the  whole  genuine  De- 
mocracy of  the  Union." 

The  prompt  approbation  of  the  separation  of  bank  and 
state  given  by  the  Equal  Rights  Party,  comprising  over 
four  thousand  voters,  was  of  some  importance  at  this 
juncture.  It  was  soon  followed  by  the  approval  of  the 
Young  Men's  General  Committee,  at  a  meeting. of  that 
body  in  a  few  days  afterwards ;  and  a  public  meeting 
was  determined  on,  to  take  place  in  Tammany  Hall  on 
the  21st  September.  The  meeting  was  held,  and  the 
Loco-Foco  spirit  which  prevailed  at  it,  for  it  was  a  Loco- 
Foco  maxim  to  "  go  wherever  their  principles  went,"  had 
a  very  natural  effect  on  the  rank  and  file  of  the  Tam- 
many Democracy,  who  are  more  apt  to  receive  than  to 
originate  onward  impulses.  The  Old  Men's  General 
Committee  could  not  stop  the  popular  current  thus  set  in 
motion,  but  they  tried  to  divert  its  course  by  denouncing 
the  call  of  the  Young  Men's  General  Committee  as  being 
contrary  to  the  "  time-honored  usages." 

In  the  mean  time,  the  State  Convention  of  the  Equal 
Rights  Party  took  place  at  Utica  on  the  1 1th  September, 
the  appointed  time  ;  but  owing  to  the  neglect  of  duty  on 
the  part  of  the  Central  Committee  of  Correspondence, 
appointed  by  the  former  Convention,  in  not  forwarding 
notices  to  the  Committees  of  Correspondence,  of  the 
several  counties,  and  in  consequence  of  a  statement  ap- 
pearing in  the  Utica  Democrat  designating  a  later  day  for 
the  meeting  of  the  Convention,  for  what  purpose  is  best 
known  to  those  who  had  it  inserted,  together  with  the 
excitements  growing  out  of  the  suspension,  the  message, 
and  special  session  of  Congress,  most  of  the  counties 
•were  unrepresented.  Robert  Townsend,  Jr.,  was  elected 
President;  David  Canfield  and  Harry  Bushnell,  Vice- 
Presidents;  and  William  Hale  and  Daniel  Ji.  Robertson, 
Secretaries. 

The  Convention  sat  three  days,  and  was  closely  occu- 
pied forenoons,  afternoons,  and  evenings.  To  point  out 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  163 

all  the  reforms  demanded  by  equality  of  rights  was  an 
arduous  undertaking,  requiring  much  time  and  research  ; 
it  was  therefore  deemed  more  consistent  with  the  instruc- 
tions to  the  delegates  from  the  city  of  New-York,  and 
more  essential  to  a  thorough  reform  of  government,  to 
frame  a  new  constitution  for  the  state,  to  govern  its  legis- 
lation, and  to  show  forth  all  the  principles  for  which  the 
Equal  Rights  Party  contended.  Accordingly,  "  a  draft  of 
a  proposed  constitution,  submitted  to  the  people  of  the 
State  of  New-  York  by  a  convention  of  friends  of  consti- 
tutional reform,"  was  put  forth  by  the  Convention.  To 
the  reader  is  presented  extracts  from  this  constitution, 
containing  all  the  Loco-Focoism  in  that  document,  and 
by  the  perusal  of  which  he  can  make  himself  acquainted 
with  the  ultimate  objects  of  the  original  Loco-Foco  Party. 
In  its  definition  of  right  as  relates  to  human  conduct,  it 
declares  the  fundamental  principle  of  Christian  Demo- 
cracy, that  "  Right,  as  relates  to  actions,  is  that  principle 
of  equality  which  teaches  man  to  do  to  others  as  he  would 
that  others  should  do  to  him."  And  Loco-Focoism  is, 
that  "  those  acts  are  naturally,  politically,  and  morally, 
right,  which  may  be  done  by  all,  without  injury  to  any." 

PROPOSED  CONSTITUTION. 

ARTICLE  I.—  Natural  Rights. 

§  1.  WE,  the  People  of  the  State  of  New-York,  in  order  to  mutu- 
ally secure  to  each  other  the  peaceful  enjoyment  of  our  natural  rights, 
and  the  equal  participation  of  the  advantages  of  society,  do  hereby 
establish  the  following  Constitution,  as  our  social  compact  and  sys- 
tem of  government. 

§  2.  All  men  are  created  equally  free,  and  are  equally  entitled  to 
the  exercise  of  their  natural  rights.  On  entering  into  society,  man 
gives  up  none  of  those  rights  ;  he  only  adopts  certain  modes  of  se- 
curing the  peaceful  enjoyment  of  them. 

Man's  natural  rights  of  person  are,  his  right  to  exist,  and  to  enjoy 
his  existence  ;  and  the  right  to  exercise  those  physical  and  mental 
faculties  with  which  nature  has  endowed  him.  Man's  natural  rights 
in  relation  to  things  are,  his  right  to  the  things  produced  by  the  exer- 
cise of  his  personal  endowments,  and  his  right  to  participate  in  those 
bounties  which  nature  has  equally  given  to  all.  Right,  as  relates  to 
action,  is  that  principle  of  equality  which  teaches  man  to  do  to  others 


164  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

as  he  would  that  others  should  do  to  him.  Those  acts  are  naturally, 
politically,  and  morally  right,  which  may  be  done  by  all  without  in- 
jury to  any. 

ARTECLE  II.— Government. 

§  1.  Government  is  but  an  agent  to  exercise  such  powers  as  are 
expressly  delegated  to  it  by  the  people. 

§  2.  The  government  of  this  state  shall  consist  of  three  distinct  de- 
partments, namely,  the  Legislative,  Judicial,  and  Executive  ;  the 
members  of  which  departments  shall  be  directly  elected  by  the  people. 

§  3.  All  elections  shall  be  by  ballot,  each  citizen  of  twenty-one 
years  of  age  or  upwards,  who  shall  be  an  actual  resident  of  the  place 
where  he  may  offer  his  vote,  having  equal  suffrage.  General  elec- 
tions shall  be  held  on  the  first  Tuesday  in  the  November  of  each  year, 
and  those  persons  having  a  majority  shall  be  considered  duly  elected. 

ARTICLE  III.— Legislative  Department. 

§  1.  The  legislative  or  law-making  power  shall  be  exercised  by 
two  branches  of  delegates,  a  Senate  aud  House  of  Assembly. 

§  2.  The  Legislat\ire"shall  from  time  to  time  divide  the  state  into  as 
many  congressional  districts  as  it  sends  members  to  congress  ;  each 
of  which  shall,  besides  electing  one  representative  to  congress,  also 
elect  one  member  to  the  Senate  of  the  stale.  It  shall  also  subdivide 
each  congressional  district  into  four  Assembly  Districts,  each  of  which 
shall  elect  one  delegate  to  the  House  of  Assembly. 

§  5.  The  Legislature  shall  pass  only  general  and  equal  laws,  de- 
claring the  duties  and  reciprocities  of  the  community  and  its  mem- 
bers to  each  other  respectively ;  protecting  individuals  in  the  enjoy- 
ment of  their  natural  rights  of  person  and  of  property,  prohibiting  ag- 
gressions on  them,  and  specifying  the  redress  for  all  aggressions  and 
the  mode  of  obtaining  it. 

§  6.  The  Legislature  shall  not  charter  or  create  any  corporate  or 
artificial  body,  nor  confer  on  any  individual  or  company  either  ex- 
clusive advantages  or  special  privileges. 

§  7.  The  Legislature  shall  not  borrow  money  or  contract  loans  in 
the  name  of  the  people ;  but  it  may  submit  bills  authorizing  public 
loans  to  the  people,  which  bills  shall  become  binding  when  ratified 
by  a  majority  of  the  voters  at  a  general  election.. 

§  8.  The  Legislature  in  session  has  power  to  alter,  amend,  or  re- 
peal any  act,  law,  or  proceeding  of  any  former  session. 

§  9.  Neither  the  Legislature  nor  either  branch  of  it  shall  ever  ex- 
ercise judicial  or  executive  powers,  except  over  its  own  members 
while  in  session. 

ARTICLE  IV.— Judicial  Department. 

§  1.  Each  Congressional  District  of  this  state  shall  elect  one  Judge, 
at  a  general  election.  Each  Judge  so  chosen  shall  hold  office  for 
four  years,  and  be  eligible  to  re-election. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  165 

§  2.  This  state  shaU  be  divided  into  eight  Judicial  Circuits  by  the 
Legislature.  The  Judges  of  each  Circuit  shall,  by  mutual  arrange- 
ment, preside  in  turn  in  the  several  District  Courts  of  their  Circuit, 
and,  as  nearly  as  practicable,  in  regular  rotation. 

§  3.  The  District  Courts  wherein  these  Judges  preside,  shall  have 
criminal  and  civil  jurisdiction  in  all  cases,  either  in  law  or  equity  ; 
and  shall  also  be  courts  of  appeal  from  the  decisions  of  the  courts  of 
justice  of  the  peace.  They  shall  have  power,  except  in  criminal 
cases,  to  examine  the  parties  to  any  suit,  when  required  by  either  of 
the  parties.  The  times  and  places  of  their  sitting  shall  be  regulated 
by  law. 

§  4.  It  shall  be  the  duty  of  the  aforesaid  Judges  to  assemble  on  the 
first  Tuesday  of  December  in  each  year,  in  the  city  of  Utica,  and  on 
the  first  Tuesday  of  June  in  each  year,  in  the  city  of  New- York,  to 
constitute  a  high  Court  of  appeal,  which  shall  hold  its  session  in  each 
place  until  the  docket  of  cases  is  gone  through. 

§  5.  When  thus  assembled,  they  shall  elect,  by  ballot,  from  the 
Judges  present,  a  President  of  the  Court  of  Appeals,  to  preside  in 
said  court. — Juries  of  twelve  men  each  shall  then  be  drawn  from  the 
Judges  present.  These  juries  shall  sit  by  alternation,  or  as  cases 
may  require,  in  the  jury  box,  hear  cases,  retire,  and  bring  in  their 
verdicts,  in  like  manner  as  other  juries. 

§  6.  This  Court  of  Appeals  shall  have  jurisdiction  in  all  civil  and 
criminal  cases  of  appeal,  either  in  law  or  equity.  It  shall  also  try 
all  cases  of  impeachment  of  any  public  officer  for  mal-practice  in 
office,  when  impeached  by  the  Executive  or  either  branch  of  the 
Legislature. 

§  7.  This  court  shall  have  power  to  examine  the  parties  to  any 
civil  suit,  and  to  send  for  and  examine  witnesses  when  there  is  any 
ambiguity  in  the  minutes  of  evidence  from  the  court  below.  It  shall 
have  power  to  order,  admit,  or  reject  evidence  by  commission  or  affi- 
davit. Its  decisions  shall  be  final  in  all  cases ;  but  no  party  shall  be 
debarred  from  petitioning  the  legislature  for  relief. 

§  8.  No  court  of  law  or  justice  shall  hereafter  practise  judicial 
legislation,  by  adopting  or  admitting  the  laws,  precedents,  decisions, 
or  legal  authorities  of  other  nations  or  states  into  the  jurisprudence 
or  courts  of  this  state.  When  our  own  laws  provide  no  special  act 
or  provision  for  a  case,  the  jury  shall  determine  according  to  the 
principles  of  natural  right  and  justice. 

§  9,  In  all  criminal  cases,  a  verdict  must  be  unanimous ;  but  in  all 
civil  cases,  a  verdict  signed  by  two-thirds  of  the  jury  shall  be  valid. 

§  10.  When  a  jury  shall  agree  on  a  verdict  against  the  accused  in 
any  criminal  prosecution,  it  shall  also  specify  the  measure  of  punish- 
ment. In  civil  cases,  it  shall  also  determine  the  amount  of  its  ver- 
dict ;  but  in  all  cases  where  the  jury  cannot  agree  on  the  measure 
of  punishment,  or  on  the  amount  to  be  awarded,  the  Judge  shall  de- 
cide the  matter. 

Of  the  judiciary  system  above  described,  Judge  Ham- 


166  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

mond  says  in  substance,  in  his  history  of  the  political 
parties  of  this  State,  that  although  it  may  render  him 
liable  to  the  charge  of  heresy,  yet  he  confesses  it  to  be 
superior  to  the  existing  system.  The  reader  will  see  it 
has  the  merit  of  preserving  trial  by  jury  in  the  Court  of 
Appeals,  fulfilling  thereby  the  provision  of  the  constitu- 
tion of  the  United  States,  which  enjoins  trial  by  jury  in 
all  criminal  cases,  and  in  all  civil  suits  above  th4  sum  of 
twenty  dollars. 

The  Executive  department  laid  down  by  this  constitu- 
tion, is  not  inserted  here,  neither  is  the  article  in  relation 
to  public  or  civil  officers.  A  great  portion  of  the  7th 
article  is  extracted. 

ARTICLE  VII.— Rights  and  Prohibitions. 

§  1.  Every  profession,  business,  or  trade,  not  hurtful  to  the  com- 
munity, shall  be  equally  open  to  the  pursuit  of  every  member  of  the 
community,  without  charter,  license,  impediment,  or  prohibition.  No 
exclusive  privilege  or  monopoly  shall  be  granted. 

§  2.  No  exemption  laws  shall  be  passed  or  remain  in  force,  ex- 
empting any  person,  class,  order,  kind,  or  description  of  persons  or 
property,  from  any  public  duty,  tax,  or  burden,  to  which  the  rest  of 
the  community  is  subject. 

§  4.  The  right  of  personal  liberty  is  sacred  ;  and  no  man  shall  be 
arrested  or  imprisoned  except  for  crime,  or  when  there  is  strong  pro- 
bability of  his  criminality  supported  by  affidavit.  Prisoners,  except 
for  murder,  shall  be  bailable  without  delay ;  and  in  the  event  of  being 
strangers,  or  in  circumstances  of  poverty,  so  that  they  cannot  procure 
bail,  they  shall  have  the  right  to  demand  immediate  trial  or  libera- 
tion, and  to  be  immediately  tried  or  liberated.  In' all  criminal  prose- 
cutions, the  accused  hath  the  right  to  be  informed  of  the  accusation 
against  him,  to  have  a  copy  of  the  indictment  or  charge  in  due  time 
to  prepare  for  his  defence ;  to  be  allowed  counsel ;  to  be  confronted 
with  the  witnesses  against  him ;  to  have  compulsory  process  for  wit- 
nesses in  his  behalf;  to  examine  witnesses  for  and  against  him ;  to 
a  speedy  trial  by  an  impartial  jury,  without  whose  unanimous  con- 
sent he  shall  be  deemed  innocent ;  and  no  man,  in  any  criminal  case, 
shall  be  compelled  to  give  evidence  against  himself. 

§  6.  There  shall  be  no  capital  punishment ;  but  in  all  convictions 
for  murder  or  unjustifiable  homicide,  the  sentence  shall  be  banish- 
ment or  imprisonment  at  hard  labor  for  life ;  the  nett  profits  of  said 
labor  to  be  given  to  the  dependants  and  relations  of  the  person  mur- 
dered, or  to  the  poor,  as  the  jury  shall  direct. 

§  7.  All  felonies  shall  be  punished  with  confinement  at  hard  labor ; 
the  term  imprisonment  and  labor,  as  to  the  greatest  and  least  amount 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  167 

for  the  different  kinds  of  offences,  to  be  specified  by  the  legislature.  But 
restitution  shall  be  made  to  the  parties  injured,  from  the  property  or 
the  proceeds  of  the  labor  of  the  convict ;  the  precise  amount  of  punish- 
ment and  restitution  to  be  fixed  by  the  jury. 

§  8.  The  time  or  labor  of  convicts  shall  not  be  bargained  to  con- 
tractors, or  to  any  person  whatsoever.  All  articles  manufactured  in 
the  prisons  of  this  state,  over  and  above  the  consumption  of  the  con- 
victs, and  over  and  above  the  purposes  of  restitution,  shall  be  ap- 
propriated to  the  use  of  the  poor  in  such  manner  as  the  legislature 
shall  direct. 

§  9.  Embezzlement  of  property  by  carriers,  or  persons  taking  goods 
on  freightage,  and  all  breaches  of  trust  by  persons  receiving  money  or 
property  for  safe  keeping  and  restoration  to  the  owner,  his  agent,  or 
assignee,  shall  be  indictable  as  frauds,  and  all  frauds  shall  be  punisha- 
ble as  felonies. 

§  10.  No  law  shall  be  valid  for  the  forcible  collection  of  debts  aris- 
ing from  voluntary  agreement  between  individuals,  wherein  one  par- 
ty relinquishes  his  right  to  and  possession  of  any  species  of  property 
on  the  promise  by  the  other  party  of  another  thing  or  equivalent. 
[This  section  shall  apply  only  to  debts  contracted  after  the  adoption 
of  this  constitution.] 

The  reader  will  perceive  that  the  foregoing  constitution 
restricts  the  Legislative  power,  and  guards  the  Equal 
Rights  of  the  citizen,  in  any  pursuit  of  business  he  may 
be  desirous  of  following,  not  hurtful  to  the  community. 
And  if  he  properly  views  the  late  Bankruptcy  act  of  the 
United  States,  he  will  infinitely  prefer  the  Loco-Foco  pro- 
position of  the  repeal  of  all  laws  for  the  collection  of 
debts,  arising  in  future. 

The  Convention  appointed  a  committee  to  draft  an 
address  to  the  people  of  the  State.  From  this  address, 
the  following  selections  are  presented  to  the  reader. 

TO  THE  PEOPLE  OF  THE  STATE  OF  NEW-YORK. 
FELLOW  CITIZENS  : 

You  constitute  the  sovereign  power  of  the  state.  You  are  respon- 
sible— responsible  before  God  and  man — for  the  just  exercise  of  that 
power.  And  if  you  permit  it  to  be  employed  in  outraging  the  rights 
of  any  portion  of  your  fellow  men,  and  in  reducing  thousands  of  in- 
dustrious citizens,  a  vast  portion  of  whom  are  defenceless  women  and 
children,  to  the  condition  of  paupers  and  slaves^  no  individual  among 
you  can  exonerate  himself  from  the  guilt,  nor  (if  God  be  just)  from  its 
just  punishment. 

There  never  was  a  time  when  human  law  was  so  perfect  that  there 
was  no  room  for  improvement,  or  so  just  and  upright  that  there  was 


168  HISTORY   OF   THE  [1837. 

no  public  wrong  to  reform.  The  time  has  now  arrived  when  reform 
is  not  merely  desirable,  but  indispensable  to  our  very  existence  ;  and 
we  therefore  hope  that  those  who,  in  imitation  of  the  Tory  Lords  of 
England,  style  themselves  "  conservatives/'  and  shout "  let  well  alone," 
will  not  induce  you  to  let  ILL  alone  any  longer. 

There  are  a  multitude  of  political  and  social  abuses  in  our  state, 
which  cry  aloud  to  you  for  reform,  and  to  heaven  for  judgment — 
abuses  which  not  only  compel  vast  numbers  of  our  fellow  men  to  short- 
en their  lives  by  excessive  toil,  but  which  destroy  the  virtues  of  the 
people,  and  render  human  life  a  mere  swinish  scramble  to  escape  star- 
vation. 

At  present,  although  we  may  live  under  the  cloak  of  republicanism, 
we  are  in  reality  subjected  to  the  worst  of  all  tyrannies — an  aristo- 
cracy of  wealth.  Our  actual  government,  our  real  regulator  of  social 
rights  and  social  intercourse,  is  money — the  greater  heaps  ruling  the 
less.  This  indeed  has  generally  been  the  essence  of  all  governments, 
whatever  might  be  their  outward  form.  One  of  the  best  and  ablest  of 
Christian  statesmen  (Lord  Chancellor  Sir  THOMAS  MORE)  declares, 
that  all  the  governments  he  had  either  seen  or  known  were  little  else 
than  a  conspiracy  of  greedy  men,  first,  to  monopolise  all  the  common 
gifts  of  God  to  man  ;  and  then,  to  get  the  labor  of  those  whom  they 
had  thus  wickedly  made  destitute  and  dependent  at  as  low  rates  as 
possible,  and  oppress  them  as  much  as  they  please.  Such  was  the  na- 
ture of  the  soul-debasing  tyranny  from  which  our  ancestors  sought  a 
refuge  in  this  western  wilderness,  and  which,  owing  to  the  influence 
of  vicious  training  and  dishonest  habits,  was  allowed  to  take  root 
here.  For  however  great  may  be  the  extent  of  our  theoretical  free- 
dom, the  practical  doctrine  of  our  government  has  been,  that  every 
poor  man's  child  surrenders,  at  his  birth,  all  the  rights  it  derives 
from  nature  and  nature's  God  into  the  hands  of  the  government,  or  of 
persons  privileged  by  government  to  enjoy  or  sell  them.  Here,  as  in 
other  aristocracies  of  wealth,  man  is  made  to  derive  his  rights,  not 
from  the  free  bounty  of  his  Creator,  but  from  the  formal  scrawls  of 
scribes  and  office  holders ;  the  mass  of  the  people  not  being  permitted 
by  law  to  plant  a  seed  or  fruit  tree  even  in  the  wilderness  for  their 
own  sustenance,  and  are  enabled  to  obtain  food  and  shelter  only  by 
selling  their  personal  endowments,  for  longer  or  shorter  terms  of  ser- 
vice, to  the  highest  bidder.  For  a  long  time  after  the  formation  of 
our  state  government,  it  was  so  completely  an  aristocracy  of  wealth 
that  none  but  the  possessors  of  a  given  amount  of  wealth  (having  at 
least  the  power  to  derive  gain  from  the  industry  or  necessities  of  the 
poor)  were  allowed  any  voice  in  its  enactments  ;  while  the  honest 
laborer  who  had  been  made  landless  by  law,  or  houseless  by  oppres- 
sion, was  required  to  hazard  his  heart's  blood  in  defence  of  the  hand 
that  deliberately  stripped  him  of  his  natural  rights  and  destroyed  his 
social  equality. 

It  should  be  borne  in  mind,  however,  that  the  original  organizers 
of  our  state  government,  exhausted  by  a  tedious  war  against  British 
usurpation,  did  not  profess  to  have  framed  such  a  system  as  they 
wished  to  see  finally  established  ;  and  that  they  merely  constructed  a 


1836  ]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  169 

temporary  shelter  out  of  the  least  odious  parts  of  the  system  they 
had  warred  against,  leaving  it  to  their  descendants,  when  enlightened 
by  study  and  refreshed  by  peace,  to  establish  a  social  edifice  based  en- 
tirely on  the  immediate  principles  of  equality  and  justice.  Then, 
also,  as  now,  the  advocates  of  social  reform  were  greatly  retarded  by 
those  swinish  spirits  who  had  been  used  to  look  on  other  men's  pover- 
ty as  their  opportunity ;  who  knew  no  other  good  than  gain,  no  other 
God  than  Mammon  ;  who  prided  themselves  upon  the  spoils  of  honest 
industry,  and  regarded  property  as  the  test  of  merit. 

The  great  object  of  a  constitution  is,  to  prevent  the  officers  of  gov- 
ernment from  assuming  powers  incompatible  with  the  natural  rights 
of  man  ;  and  it  is  certain  that  our  present  constitution  does  not  ac- 
complish this  paramount  design.  If  the  powers  of  public  agents  un- 
der it  are  distinctly  limited  and  clearly  defined,  why  should  their  po- 
litical principles  be  a  matter  of  such  solicitude  at  elections  ?  If  the 
constitution  contains  a  plain  guarantee  of  the  rights  of  the  people, 
whence  the  necessity  of  pledging  legislators  not  to  violate  those 
rights  ?  The  plain  truth  is,  that  constitutions  in  these  United  States 
have  been  constructed  in  the  spirit  of  compromise — of  compromise 
between  the  advocates  of  Democracy  and  the  friends  of  aristocracy — 
compromise  between  the  principles  of  right  and  wrong. 

It  is  time — the  disastrous  results  of  aristocratic  legislation  prove 
that  it  is  high  time — that  our  state  constitution  should  define  the 
powers  and  duties  of  legislators ;  and,  above  all  other  instruments,  it 
should  afford  the  clearest  pledge,  the  safest  guarantee  of  the  rights  of 
the  people  against  legislative  usurpation — against  the  creation  of 
those  vested  wrongs,  monopolies — and  against  the  fostering  of  a  sys- 
tem of  artificial  credit,  calculated  to  sap  all  public  and  private  morals, 
not  only  placing  the  advantages  of  credit  within  reach  of  the  dishon- 
est, but  enabling  hordes  of  promise-printers  and  speculators  to  en- 
gross all  the  provisions  and  goods  produced  by  the  industry  of  the  peo- 
ple, and  then  deal  them  out  at  prices  limited  only  by  the  fear  of  popu- 
lar vengeance. 

Fellow  citizens,  it  is  for  you  to  reflect  on  these  important  subjects. 
The  framers  of  the  subjoined  constitution  have  already  done  so,  and 
they  have  recurred  to  first  principles — to  the  principles  of  our  revolu- 
tionary fathers — in  framing  a  constitution  to  protect  the  equal  rights 
of  the  citizens,  and  to  maintain  the  sovereignty  of  the  people.  It  is 
very  probable  that  it  may  be  the  subject  of  virulent  attack,  of  tortuous 
construction,  or  feigned  contempt,  on  the  part  of  those  who  fawn  on  in- 
justice for  a  share  of  the  plunder,  because  it  does  not  emanate  from 
those  classes  which  have  heretofore  swayed  our  destinies.  No  leading 
politicians,  no  lawyers  or  professional  gentlemen  of  any  kind,  have  been 
consulted  or  employed  in  constructing  it.  It  is  the  work  of  working 
men — of  unambitious,  humble  men — who  have  long  been  compelled  to 
feel  most  bitterly  the  cruel  oppressions  of  the  system  founded  ?nd  upheld 
by  the  aristocracy  of  wealth  and  its  mental  prostitutes,  and  whose 
only  object  is  the  advancement  of  moral,  social  and  political  RIGHT. 

With  these  sacred  objects  in  view,  the  proposed  constitution  here- 
-vith  published,  is  respectfully  submitted  to  the  consideration  of  the 
15 


170  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

people,  in  the  hope  that  it  may  receive  their  careful  scrutiny,  and 
eventually  be  submitted  by  them  to  the  revision  of  a  larger  and  abler 
convention.  If  it  should  be  the  means  of  exciting  examination  and 
discussion,  and  of  eventually  producing  that  desirable  and  certainly 
attainable  good  to  mankind,  a  perfect  democratic  constitution,  the 
object  of  theframers  of  this  draft  will  be  fully  accomplished. 
By  order  of  the  Convention, 

ROBERT  TOWNSEND,  Jr.,  Pres. 


CHAPTER    XIII. 

Preparations  for  the  November  Election  of  1837 — Nominations  made 
— Pledge  signed  by  the  Candidates — The  Nominations  adopted  and 
the  Party  pledges  itself  to  sustain  its  Candidates — Committee  ap- 
pointed to  address  Mr.  Curtis  for  violating  his  Pledge — Five  Lo- 
co-Foco  Candidates  nominated  at  Tammany  Hall — Committee 
of  Conference  of  Union  of  the  Democracy — Candidates  of  the 
Equal  Rights  Party  called  on  to  resign,  but  most  of  them  refuse — 
A  Dilemma — C.  H.  Dougherty  and  Henry  E.  Riell's  Resolution  to 
desert  the  Equal  Rights  Candidates  adopted — The  Pledge  makers 
become  PI  edge  breakers — The  Edward  Curtis  investigation — Rump 
Loco-Focos  and  Buffaloe  Loco-Focos — The  Address  of  the  former 
— Fidelity — Decay  and  Fall  of  the  Military  and  Civic  Hotel — Con- 
clusion. 

Honor's  a  sacred  tie 
The  noble  mind's  distinguishing  perfection. — CATO. 

IN  one  of  the  British  Islands,  there  is  a  long  bay  of  se- 
veral miles  in  width,  which  is  much  frequented  by  sea 
birds.  It  is  said  that  the  fox  in  that  part  of  the  world 
envelopes  his  head  in  a  coiffure  of  sea  foam,  which  he  finds 
along  the  shore,  and  thus  disguised  he  swims  out  into  the 
bay  to  get  amongst  the  sea  birds,  in  order  to  prey  upon 
them;  but  that  sometimes  a  sudden  burst  of  wind  or 
water  deprives  him  of  his  head-dress,  and  exposes  Mr. 
Reynard  to  the  great  surprise  and  disturbance  of  the  fea- 
thered community. 

In  like  manner,  a  number  of  political  foxes  of  like 
views,  had  long  mingled  themselves  with  the  Democratic 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  171 

party,  and  preyed  upon  it  for  very  many  years,  but  at 
length  the  President's  message  of  the  Special  Session  dis- 
composed the  disguises  of  these  foxy  democrats,  and  ex- 
posed them  in  their  true  nature  of  selfishness  to  the  world 
at  large.  But  they  had  become  so  strong,  by  having  per- 
verted, with  the  spoils  of  monopoly,  many  men  who 
were,  in  early  years,  true  JefFersonian  Democrats,  that 
they  were  now  able  to  form  a  part  of  what  Mr.  Leggett 
called  the  triangular  contest.  They  held  on,  however,  to 
the  assumed  coiffure  they  had  found  so  useful  in  by-gone 
years,  for  this  party  of  privilege,  this  aristocracy  of  the 
Democracy,  styled  themselves  "  unchanged  democrats," 
"  Conservative  Democratic  Republicans. 

In  the  Old  Men's  General  Committee  of  1837,  there 
was  a  majority  of  these  unchanged  monopoly  Democrats. 
This  majority  had  refused  to  co-operate  with  the  Young 
Men's  General  Committee,  in  its  call  for  a  public  meet- 
ing on  the  twenty-first  of  September,  to  approve  the 
President's  Message ;  but  on  the  contrary  it  called  a  meet- 
ing of  those  opposed  to  the  message  to  take  place  at 
Tammany  Hall  on  the  25th  September.  This  latter  call 
was  sustained  by  the  signatures  of  about  six  hundred  of 
these  unchanged  Republicans ;  nevertheless  it  proved  a 
total  failure,  for  the  friends  of  the  message  were  so  nu- 
merous at  the  meeting,  that  the  resolutions  against  the 
message  were  negatived,  and  others  of  different  tenor  sub- 
sequently adopted. 

In  this  intestine  broil  between  the  two  General  Com- 
mittees within  the  Republican  Party,  the  Loco-Focos 
very  naturally  took  sides  with  the  adherents  of  the  Young 
Men's  Committee,  and  they  were  welcome  allies  to  the 
latter,  so  much  so,  that  a  union  began  to  be  talked  of. 
But  many  members  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party  were  very 
suspicious  of  the  political  honesty  of  Tammany,  and  par- 
ticularly so  long  as  they  saw  that  the  "  Old  hunkers,"  as 
the  old  fashioned  unchanged  Democrats  were  nick-named, 
had  any  power  there.  As  late  as  September  the  19th 
the  Loco-Focos  at  a  public  meeting,  passed  a  "  Resolu- 


172  HISTORY    OF    THE  [1837. 

tion  against  a  communication  which  had  appeared  in 
the  Evening  Post  over  the  signature  of  "A  Member  of 
the  Equal  Rights  Party,"  recommending  such  a  union  of 
the  Democratic  family. 

While  these  circumstances  were  in  progress,  the  Equal 
Rights  Party  were  not  unmindful  of  the  approaching 
election.  They  had  published  the  names  put  in  nomina- 
tion for  candidates,  and  at  meetings  for  the  purpose,  their 
ticket  was  nearly  completed,  by  the  end  of  the  month  of 
September.  The  following  were  the  candidates. 

For  Assembly. 

Robert  Townsend,  jr.,  Levi  D.  Slamm, 

Daniel  Gorham,  Job  Haskell, 

Charles  Dingley,  John  H.  Hunt, 

Josephus  N.  Grain,  Daniel  C.  Pentz, 

Warden  Hayward,  John  W.  Brown, 

John  Wilder,  Hugh  Collins, 
James  L.  Stratton. 

For  Sheriff.  George  W.  Matsell, 

"  County  Clerk.  Alexander  Ming,  jr., 

"  Coroner.  A.  D.  Wilson. 

The  following  pledge  for  these  candidates  to  sign,  was 
agreed  upon  by  a  special  meeting  on  22d  September. 
PLEDGE. 

We,  the  above  named  Candidates  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party,  of  the 
city  and  County  of  New  York,  do  hereby  mutually  pledge  ourselves, 
that,  if  elected,  we  will,  to  the  best  of  our  ability,  advocate  and  vote 
for  all  measures  in  accordance  with  the  Declaration  of  Rights  of  the 
Equal  Rights  Party. 

2.  We  will  endeavor  by  our  influence  and  votes  to  procure  the  re- 
peal, immediately,  of  the  Suspension  and  Mortgage  Acts. 

3.  The  Repeal  of  the  Restraining  Act. 

4.  To  oppose  the  State  Prison  Monopoly. 

5.  To  second  every  Constitutional  effort  of  the  Government  of 
the  United  States  to  restore  a  Specie  Currency  to  the  people. 

6.  To  procure  a  morfe  extended,  equal  and  convenient  system  of 
Common  School  Instruction. 

7.  We  do,  also,  agree  tojoppose  the  passage  of  any  act  by  the  Legis- 
lature, which  will   encroach  upon  the  Natural  and  Constitutional 
Rights  of  the  people. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO   PARTY.  173 

8.  To  procure  the  passage  of  a  Law  allowing  a  fair  compensation 
to  Jurors  and  Witnesses. 

The  ticket  was  on  the  2d  of  October  fully  made  up  by 
the  nomination  of  Stephen  Hasbrouck  for  the  State  Senate, 
and  all  the  candidates  signed  the  pledge,  as  appears  by 
the  proceedings  of  the  12th  October. 

The  proceedings  further  state,  that  "  after  much  dis- 
cussion on  the  practicability  of  forming  a  union  ticket 
with  the  anti-monopolists  of  Tammany  Hall,  and  uniting 
with  them  at  the  ensuing  election,  the  Report  and  further 
action  on  the  ratification  of  our  ticket  were  deferred,  un- 
til Thursday  night,  October  19th."  When  this  latter 
meeting  took  place,  the  following  resolution  was  offered 
by  Charles  Fox,  and  "  unanimously  adopted." 

Resolved — That  the  organization  and  principles  of  the  Whig,  as 
well  as  those  of  the  Tammany  Party,  are  inconsistent  with  the  genius 
of  our  Democratic  institutions,  and  they,  therefore,  cannot  receive 
the  support  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party. 

After  which  the  proceedings  go  on  to  state,  that  "  the 
State  and  County  Tickets,  as  completed,  were  then  taken 
up  and  confirmed  amidst  enthusiastic  cheers." 

The  following  Preamble  and  Resolution,  offered  by 
Josephus  N.  Grain,  were  also  unanimously  adopted  : — 

Whereas,  we,  the  Equal  Rights  Party  of  the  city  and  county  of 
New  York,  are  informed  by  the  public  prints  that  our  representative 
in  Congress,  Edward  Curtis,  voted  against  the  resolution  of  Mr. 
Cambreleng,  declaring  it  inexpedient  to  charter  a  national  bank,  and 
also  against  the  sub-treasury  bill,  or  bill  to  divorce  bank  and  state. 

Resolved — That  a  committee  of  five  be  appointed  to  write  to  the 
said  Edward  Curtis,  in  reference  to  the  same,  and  to  request  that  he 
will,  at  his  earliest  convenience,  inform  this  party  through  the  said 
committee  as  to  the  correctness  of  the  above-mentioned  information, 
and  if  correct,  with  such  explanations  as  he  may  think  due  to  the 
Equal  Rights  Party  and  his  own  honor. 

John  A.  Riell,  Charles  Fox,  Michael  Dougherty,  John 
Bogert,  and  Thomas  S.  Day,  were  appointed  the  Com- 
mittee. 

Thus  far,  the  Equal  Rights  party  had  proceeded  regu- 
15* 


174  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

larly,  as  regarded  its  nominations  and  preparations  for 
the  fall  election.  The  County  and  State  Tickets  were, 
according  to  the  constitution  of  organization,  filled  up ; 
the  candidates  had  signed  the  pledges  required  of  them  ; 
and  the  party  ratified  and  confirmed,  "  with  enthusiastic 
cheers,"  its  pledge,  in  return,  to  the  candidates. 

But  a  change  came  over  the  spirit  of  the  "  enthusiastic 
cheers"  of  a  large  portion  of  the  party,  in  a  short  time 
afterwards ;  for  a  proposition  was  presented,  at  a  General 
Meeting  on  the  24th  October,  to  effect  the  united  support 
of  the  Democratic  family  in  favor  of  one  ticket.  The 
beginning  of  the  end  of  the  Equal  Rights  party,  was  in- 
troduced in  the  most  specious  form  imaginable. 

The  Loco-Focos  were  much  attached  to  their  demo- 
cratic organization.  Therefore  a  proposition  to  dissolve 
the  party  would  have  been  negatived  at  once ;  and,  in 
all  probability,  the  same  decision  would  have  befallen  a 
proposition  for  a  permanent  union  with  the  democracy  at 
Tammany  Hall,  without  an  alteration  of  the  "known 
usages."  But  it  was  manifest  that  the  party,  in  its  oppo- 
sition to  monopolies,  was  anxious  to  sustain  the  President 
in  the  warfare  of  the  Banks  against  him ;  and  it  was  upon 
this  sentiment  that  some  men,  for  reasons  best  known  to 
themselves,  went  to  work  to  dissolve  the  party.  Every 
reforming  party  has  found  its  most  dangerous  enemies 
within  its  own  ranks. 

Mr.  Daniel  Ji.  Robertson  opened  the  business  by  offer- 
ing a  long  and  popularly  worded  preamble,  closing  with 
the  following  harmless-looking  Resolution : — 

Resolved — That,  in  order  to  effect  a  cordial  co-operation  of  the 
Democracy,  a  committee  of  five  be  appointed  to  confer  with  the  other 
portion  of  the  Democratic  Party,  and  to  suggest  to  them  the  propriety 
of  requesting  their  candidates  to  subscribe  to  the  Declaration  of 
Rights. 

By  the  adoption  of  this  Resolution,  the  party  pro- 
nounced its  own  death  doom. 

Messrs.  Daniel  A.  Robertson,  Henry  E.  Riell,  Joseph 
Rose,  Jun.,  Michael  Dougherty,  and  Thomas  S.  Day, 
were  appointed  the  Committee  of  Conference. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  175 

This  Committee  of  limited  powers, — merely  "  to  sug- 
gest" &c., — assumed  to  itself  plenipotentiary  functions. 
They  met  a  committee  appointed  by  the  Nominating  Com- 
mittee at  Tammany  Hall,  and  matters  of  difference  were 
adjusted  to  the  entire  satisfaction  of  the  Committee  of  the 
Loco-Foco  party.  It  was  a  fortunate  circumstance, perhaps, 
that  in  any  sacrifices  agreed  upon  by  the  latter  Committee 
and  their  coadjutors,  expediency  did  not  require  any  sacri- 
fice of  self.  At  all  events  no  such  sacrifice  was  made. 

The  nominating  committee  at  Tammany  Hall  nomi- 
nated five  of  the  candidates  of  the  Equal  Rights  party, 
James  L.  Stratton,  John  H.  Hunt,  Robert  Toumsend,  Jr., 
Levi  D.  Slamm,  and  Wm.  E.  Skidmore,  for  the  House 
of  Assembly.  This  was  doing  much  towards  reconcilia- 
tion, and  the  Committee  of  Conference  did  the  rest.  It 
had  got  specific  power  to  "  suggest"  the  propriety  of  the 
candidates  at  Tammany  Hall  signing  the  Declaration  of 
Rights,  but  it  determined  not  to  do  business  by  limitation, 
To  unite  in  support  of  one  set  of  candidates  was  not 
enough,  there  must  be  a  permanent  union.  Accordingly, 
it  presented  ajlerng  Report  to  its  constituents  on  the  27th 
October,  seeing  forth  : — 

"1.  Tfeat  the  branch  of  the  party  at  Tammany  Hall  had  given 
evidprfce  of  their  disposition  to  unite  with  us  in  sustaining  the  admin- 
is*fation. 

"2.  They  have  made  a  ticket  composed  of  men  politically  and 
morally  satisfactory. 

"3.  They  have  adopted  a  Declaration  of  Rights,  essentially  the 
same  as  our  own. 

"  4.  The  individuals  nominated  have  given  unqualified  assurance, 
by  their  own  signatures,  of  their  implicit  belief  in  the  doctrines  held 
and  the  measures  we  advocate. 

"  5.  Principle  and  patriotism  demand  that  we  should  meet  them  in 
a  like  spirit  of  conciliation. 

"  6.  The  forms  of  our  organization  should  not  prevent  us  from  pur- 
suing the  path  best  devised  to  carry  out  our  principles ;  the  revival 
of  the  old  landmarks  of  democracy,  or  the  full  success  of  the  people 
in  contending  against  a  common  enemy, 

"  7.  In  union  there  is  strength  :  to  produce  union  a  mutual  con- 
cession of  personal  feeling  must  be  made — which  concession  sustains 
our  principles,  will  elect  our  ticket,  defeat  our  enemies,  and  strengthen 
the  confidence  of  the  people  in  the  administration  of  the  General 
Government, 


176  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

"  8.  Contending,  as  we  have  been,  to  revive  the  land-marks  and 
principles  of  the  original  Democratic  party,  and  to  effect  constitu- 
tional reform  in  legislation,  we  conceive,  at  this  important  crisis, 
those  measures  are  best  advanced  by  UNION  of  the  whole  Demo- 
cratic party. 

"  Your  committee,  after  mature  deliberation,  and  conscious  that  it 
will  be  beneficial  towards  the  best  interests  of  our  common  cause,  the 
cause  of  justice,  and  the  rights  of  man,  respectfully  recommend  our 
candidates  who  have  not  been  responded  to  at  Tammany  Hall,  to 
withdraw  their  names  from  our  ticket,  and  that  we  use  our  undivided 
exertions  to  support  the  ticket  named  by  them  as  it  now  stands.  We 
are  fully  of  opinion  that  in  this  manner  we  can  conquer  our  common 
enemy,  and  that  our  course  will  be  approved  by  all  those  who  wish 
Success  to  Democratic  principles." 

This  Report  was  received  and  adopted,  and  Alexander 
Ming  immediately  resigned  as  the  candidate  for  the 
office  of  Register,  and  Josephus  JV*.  Crain  as  a  candidate 
on  the  Assembly  ticket. 

Doctor  Hasbrouck  also  resigned  the  nomination  he  had 
received  for  State  Senator, ,  and  Chas.  G.  Ferris,  who 
had  been  nominated  at  Tammany  Hall,  was  adopted  in  his 
stead. 

The  meeting  adjourned  to  the  28th  October,  having 
appointed  a  committee  to  request  the  Equal  Rights 
candidates,  not  nominated  at  Tammany  Hall,  to  resign. 
But  there  were  no  resignations  to  report,  either  on  the 
28th  or  at  another  meeting  on  the  31st.  Job  Has/cell 
sent  a  letter  stating  that  he  would  not  resign  for  a  less 
vote  than  had  given  him  the  nomination.  His  letter 
made  some  excitement,  and  caused  several  motions 
respecting  it,  but  it  was  referred  back  to  the  committee. 
The  portion  for  union  was  now  in  an  awkward  dilemma. 
The  stubborn  candidates  would  not  resign,  and  the  party 
was  pledged  to  support  them.  What  a  position  was  this 
for  the  Committee  of  Conference  to  find  themselves  in, 
with  regard  to  propositions  made,  and  prospects  in  view  ? 
Desperate  cases  require  desperate  deeds.  A  resolution 
was  offered  by  C.  H.  Dougherty,  to  insist  on  resignation 
"forthwith;"  but  this  would  not  do, — "If  the  eye 
offends  you,  pluck  it  out."  This  latter  was  the  only 
course  for  the  Committee  of  Conference,  and  its  pleni- 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  177 

potentiary  arrangements  demanded  this.  Its  chairman, 
Henry  E.  Riell  amended  Mr.  C.  H.  Dougherty  by  consent 
— "That  we  the  Equal  Rights  party  have  the  fullest 
confidence  in  the  ticket  jointly  nominated  by  the  nomi- 
nating committee  at  Tammany  Hall,  and  by  the  Equal 
Rights  Party,  and  that  we  as  a  party,  adopt  it  as  our 
ticket,  and  will  use  our  best  exertions  to  procure  its  entire 
election."  This  was  carried  by  a  vote  of  71  against  22. 

Here  were  seventy-one  Loco-Focos,  advocates  of 
pledges  and  strict  construction,  who  had  repeatedly  affirm- 
ed and  re-affirmed  that  the  resolution  passed  at  the  Utica 
convention,  "  to  remain  a  separate  and  distinct  party  from 
all  existing  parties  and  factions  in  this  State,  until  all 
the  people  realize  that  Equality  of  Rights  which  we  are 
now  permitted  only  to  contemplate  in  the  distance  with 
hope."  Who  had  pledged  their  candidates  to  their 
measures,  and  pledged  themselves  to  their  candidates 
"  with  enthusiastic  cheers."  Yet  these  pledge-makers 
become  the  most  violent  and  shameless  of  pledge  break- 
ers. WThat  were  the  influences  which  had  come  over 
them ! 

While  these  circumstances  were  in  progress,  many  of 
the  Loco-Focos  refrained  from  attending  the  meetings, 
where  contention  and  violence  prevailed.  The  most 
ultra  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party,  were  not  averse  to  a 
union  with  the  rest  of  the  Democracy,  but  to  place  them- 
selves under  the  dominion  of  the  aristocratic  "  usages  of 
the  party,"  was  what  they  were  much  opposed  to.  Be- 
sides, the  Democracy  at  Tammany,  had  not,  as  stated  by 
the  committee  of  conference,  "  adopted  a  declaration  of 
Rights  essentially  the  same  as  our  own."  It  did  not  set 
forth  the  principle  quoted  from  Thomas  Jefferson,  "  that 
the  idea  is  quite  unfounded  that  on  entering  society  we 
give  up  any  natural  right."  It  did  not  declare,  "  Hos- 
tility to  the  dangerous  and  unconstitutional  creation  of 
vested  rights,  or  prerogatives  by  legislation,  because  they 
are  usurpations  of  the  people's  sovereign  rights."  It  did 
not  avow  that  "  We  hold  that  each  and  every  law  or  act 


178  HISTORY    OF    THE  [1837. 

of  incorporation,  passed  by  preceding  legislatures,  can  be 
rightfully  altered  or  repealed  'by  their  successors;  and 
that  they  should  be  altered  or  repealed,  when  necessary 
for  the  public  good,  or  when  required  by  a  majority  of 
the  people."  Neither  did  it  declare  "  unqualified  hostility 
to  bank  notes  and  paper  money  as  a  circulating  medium." 

Besides,  the  Declaration  of  Principles,  "  essentially  the 
same  as  our  own,"  was  only  adopted  by  the  nominating 
committee  at  Tammany  Hall,  and  not  by  either  of  the 
general  committees.  Incomplete  as  it  was,  there  was  no 
adoption  of  it  as  yet  by  the  Republican  Party,  and  there- 
fore no  general  acknowledgment  or  permanent  guarantee. 
Many  of  the  Loco-Focos  from  past  experience  did  not 
like  to  trust  "  Old  Tammany,"  and  they  resisted  a  union 
until  better  assured.  Hence  the  Equal  Rights  Party  be- 
came divided  within  itself;  the  majority  for  union,  called 
the  opposing  minority  Rumps,  and  the  latter  called  the 
majority  Buffaloes.  The  conflict  was  criminative  and 
re-criminative,  between  these  adverse  sections.  Even 
the  use  of  the  venerable  room  in  the  old  Military  and 
Civic  Hotel,  became  a  matter  of  rivalry  and  strife.  Alas ! 
who  could  have  foreseen  that  while  two  bodies  of  men 
were  competing  with  each  other  for  the  use  of  the  cradle 
of  Loco-Focoism,  that  in  a  few  weeks  neither  would  care 
about  it ! 

The  following  notice  appeared  in  the  Evening  Post, 
28th  October. 

LOCO-FOCOS  ATTEND  ! 

The  members  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party,  in  favor  of  sustaining  the 
principles  of  their  constitution  and  opposed  to  a  union  with  the  Tam- 
many Party,  are  requested  to  attend  a  meeting  on  Monday  evening, 
at  half  past  seven  o'clock,  at  Military  and  Civic  Hotel,  corner 
Bowery  and  Broome  Streets. 

DAVID  LEVERICK,  JOHN  BOGERT, 

WM.  L.  BOYCE,  EGBERT  L.  MANNING, 

I.  M.  DENNIS,  ROBERT  HOGBIN, 

JOHN  WINDT. 

The  awful  schism  between  the  Buffaloes  and  Rumps, 
was  remarkable  for  its  virulence  and  violence.  Dr.  Ste- 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  179 

phen  Hasbrouck  endeavored  to  mediate  in  every  extreme 
that  either  faction  would  go,  but  with  little  effect,  for  it 
is  easier  to  compromise  principle  than  enmity.  The 
Rumps  charged  the  Buffaloes  with  having  views  to  office 
more  than  principle.  The  Buffaloes  accused  the  Rumps 
with  being  bribed  by  the  Whigs,  to  oppose  the  union  of 
the  Democracy,  and  they  therefore  conspired  to  slay  the 
prominent  Rump  Loco-Focos,  particularly  John  Windt 
and  F.  Byrdsall.  But  their  malice  aforethought  only 
contemplated  political  death,  and  this  they  were  deter- 
mined to  effect,  because  they  conceived  it  indispensable 
to  the  objects  they  had  in  view.  The  Evening  Post 
misled  by  Buffalo  misrepresentations^  charged  Windt 
with  being  a  recipient  of  Whig  patronage,  a  share  of  the 
public  printing,  (which  was  utterly  untrue),  and  cautioned 
the  Democracy  respecting  him.  Windt  replied,  and  that 
paper  at  once  retracted  its  erroneous  charges.  Byrdsall 
had  hitherto  been  very  lucky.  The  public  press,  while  it 
spared  none  of  his  political  associates,  had  not  noticed 
him,  although  he  was  the  officer  of  the  party  to  call  its 
meetings,  and  although  he  spoke  more  frequently  at  those 
meetings  than  any  other  man.  But  his  turn  came  at  last, 
that  he  must  be  killed,  and  the  Rumps  were  not  per- 
mitted to  interpose  in  his  behalf;  however  strong  in  the 
mental,  the  Buffaloes  had  the  advantage  in  the  physical, 
and  the  only  hindrance  to  the  deed  of  death,  was  how 
could  it  be  done  ? 

Politicians  can  find  expedients  for  every  emergency. 
In  this  case,  it  was  expedient  that  the  committee  appoint- 
ed to  correspond  with  Mr.  Curtis  in  relation  to  his  votes 
in  Congress,  should  do  the  deed  of  malice  aforethought, 
But  with  all  the  committee  could  do,  it  dared  not  attempt 
more  than  a  half  death,  to  strike  in  the  subjunctive  mood. 
It  brought  in  a  report  against  Mr.  Curtis,  in  which  by 
insinuations  it  labored  to  excite  suspicions  of  the  moral 
and  political  integrity  of  the  Recording  Secretary.  Two 
of  the  committee  did  not  sign  it,  two  of  those  who  did 
were  members  of  the  committee  of  conference,  working 


180  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

for  the  union  of  the  Loco-Foco  and  Tammany  Parties  ; 
and  the  third,  the  chairman  of  the  committee,  was  bro- 
ther to  the  chairman  of  the  committee  of  conference. 
The  report  is  not  drawn  up  in  the  hand  writing  of  any  of 
the  five  members  composing  the  committee,  nor  did  the 
Recording  Secretary  ever  know  any  part  of  its  contents, 
until  after  he  began  to  write  this  history. 

The  whole  of  the  report  follows,  omitting  only  the  in- 
troductory paragraph. 

«  That  on  the  20th  of  October  last  past,  the  committee  proceeded 
to  perform  the  duty  assigned  them,  by  addressing  a  letter  with  the 
preamble  and  resolution  therein  contained,  to  Edward  Curtis,  which 
elicited  from  him  the  following  reply  : 

'New  York,  October  24,  1837. 

f  GENTLEMEN — I  have  had  the  honor  to  receive  your  letter  of  the 
20th  of  October  inst.,  communicating  a  copy  of  a  resolution  of  the 
Equal  Rights  Party,  adopted  on  the  19th  inst.  In  reply  to  your  in- 
quiry concerning  my  votes  on  the  resolution  from  the  Committee  of 
Ways  and  Means  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  declaring  it  to  be 
inexpedient  to  charter  a  National  Bank,  and  upon  the  Sub-Treasury 
Bill,  I  have  to  inform  you  that  my  name  is  truly  recorded  as  having 
voted  in  the  negative  upon  a  motion  to  lay  the  resolution  upon  the 
table,  and  again  in  the  negative  when  the  question  was  directly  upon 
the  passage  of  that  resolution. 

'  My  vote  upon  the  Sub-Treasury  Bill  was  in  the  affirmative  upon 
a  motion  to  lay  the  subject  upon  the  table.  But  little  time  was 
allowed  for  the  discussion  of  that  bill,  and  had  I  been  compelled  to 
vote  directly  upon  its  merits,  I  should  have  voted  in  the  negative.  I 
am  not  aware,  gentlemen,  that  in  these  votes  I  have  departed  from 
any  opinions  supposed  to  have  been  entertained  by  me  at  the  time  of 
my  election  as  a  member  of  Congress. 

f  In  the  '  Declaration  of  Principles '  of  the  anti-monopoly  party,  as 
the  party  was  denominated  prior  to  the  15th  Sept.,  1836,  there  were 
clauses  to  which  I  had  no  objections,  other  clauses  from  which  I  to- 
tally dissented,  and  others  which  were  objectionable  or  not,  according 
to  the  construction  put  upon  them ;  and  these  last  clauses  were  vari- 
ously construed  by  different  members  of  the  party.  I  avowed  my 
willingness*  to  subscribe  to  the  '  Declaration  of  Principles '  in  the 
hands  of  your  Recording  Secretary,  provided  he  would  at  the  same 

*  This  willingness  was  never  avowed  to  the  Recording  Secretary  by 
Mr.  Curtis  before  he  signed  the  Declaration  of  Principles.  But  Dr.  A 
F.  Vache  informed  the  Recording  Secretary  that  Mr.  Curtis  was  willing 
to  sign  it,  and  that  he  had  some  remarks  or  commentaries  to  make  on 
the  Declaration  in  writing.  An  appointment  was  then  made  for  Mr. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  181 

time  receive  a  written  communication  tinder  my  hand,  explaining  at 
large  the  sense  in  which  I  agreed  to  those  political  doctrines,  and 
containing  the  limitations  and  exceptions  with  which  my  assent  was 
to  be  received,  and  would  communicate  that  written  statement  to  the 
County  Convention  of  the  party,  and  whenever  and  wherever  my 
name  might  be  considered,  at  any  meeting  of  the  party,  as  a  candidate. 

*  Accordingly,  such  a  statement  in  writing,  in  the  form  of  a  letter, 
dated  the  —  day  of  September,  1836,  was  delivered  by  me  to  the 
Recording  Secretary,  at  the  moment  I  subscribed  to  the  Declaration 
of  Principles,  and  was  received  by  him  to  be  communicated  to  the 
party  as  a  qualification  of  my  assent.     The  Secretary  did  communi- 
cate the  same  to  the  party,  in  County  Convention,  and  there  read  the 
same  in  open  meeting,  and  at  the  same  meeting  which,  after  at  first 
objecting  to,  and  again  reading  and  discussing  the  letter,  proceeded, 
by  a  small  majority,  as  I  was  informed  at  the  time,  to  agree  upon  my 
nomination.     I  beg  leave,  gentlemen,  to  refer  you  to  that  letter,  in 
the  hands  of  your  Secretary,  and  I  ask  that  it  may  be  published  as  a 
part  of  this  correspondence,  if  anything  on  this  subject  be  published. 
It  is  twice  repeated  in  that  letter,  that  it  is  to  be  taken  as  express- 
ive of  the  sense  in  which  I  had  adopted  the  several  sections  of  the 
'  Declaration  of  Principles/  and  the  extent  to  which  I  assented  to  them. 

'  A  copy  of  the  same  letter  was  communicated  to  the  members  of 
the  Whig  Nominating  Committee,  and  its  contents  publicly  stated  in 
that  committee,  before  my  nomination  by  that  body.  I  read  the  let- 
ter publicly  when  spoken  to  on  the  subject,  at  the  offices  of  the 
Courier  &  Enquirer,  the  Evening  Star,  and  other  places.  The  Even- 
ing Star  and  the  Courier  &  Enquirer  both  repelled  in  their  columns, 
(I  think  on  the  23d  Oct.),  the  charge  which  had  been  made  by  the 
New- York  Times,  that  I  had  pledged  myself  to  all  the  doctrines  of 
the  anti-monopoly  party,  and  they  characterized  my  letter  as  one  to 
which  no  Whig  ought  to  object.  To  counteract  a  rumor  which  had 
gone  to  the  Whig  Committee,  that  I  had  given  unqualified  adhesion 
to  the  {  Declaration  of  Principles,'  several  prominent  members  of  the 
Anti-Monopoly  Party  attended  at  the  Broadway  House,  during  the 
session  of  the  Whig  Committee,  and  there  assured  several  of  the 
members  of  that  committee  of  the  truth  of  the  case,  and  that  I  was 
not  considered  as  having  given  any  other  than  the  qualified  assent 
contained  in  my  letter,  and  according  to  the  views  and  opinions 
therein  set  forth. 

*  You  will  remember,  gentlemen,  that  I  was  unknown  in  politics, 
except  as  a  member  of  the  Whig  Party — that  I  was  identified  with 

Curtis  to  meet  the  Recording  Secretary  at  John  Windt's  office,  in 
Frankfort  street,  to  sign  the  Declaration.  After  he  signed,  he  put  the 
paper  in  the  hands  of  the  Recording  Secretary,  who,  when  he  read  it, 
found  it  different  from  what  he  had  Reason  to  expect,  and  he  made 
objections  to  it.  Mr.  Curtis  requested  that  it  should  be  read  to  the 
Party  if  his  name  ever  came  up  for  nomination ;  and  this  the  Record- 
ing Secretary  promised  to  do,  and  did  as  a  duty  which  he  owed  to  the 
Equal  Rights  Party. 
16 


182  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

that  party  in  all  their  points  of  difference  with  the  Jackson  Party— 
that  I  had  twice  been  elected  to  the  Common  Council  by  the  Whigs, 
and  had  just  come  out  of  a  sharp  and  protracted  contest  in  the  Board 
of  Assistant  Aldermen,  as  the  Whig  candidate  for  the  Presidency  of 
that  Board.     On  the  23d  Sept.,  1836,  and  while  my  nomination  was 
pending  before  the  Anti-Monopoly  Party,  I  presided  at  the  general 
meeting  of  the  Whig  Young  Men  of  this  city,  whose  proceedings, 
under  my  name,  were  published  in  all  the  Whig  papers  of  the  city. 
In  my  reply  to  the  letter  of  the  Committee  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party, 
who  informed  me  of  my  nomination,  and  requested  my  assent  to  a 
certain  paper  called  a  '  Bill  of  Highly,'  I  waived  any  answer  to  that 
request,  and  referred  to  a  former  occasion,  in  which  I  had  made 
known  my  sentiments,  and  assented  to  the  Declaration  of  Principles. 
Upon  the  whole,  gentlemen,  I  think  it  idle  to  disguise  the  impression 
I  have  always  had,  that  it  was  in  hostility  to  Tammany  Hall,  the 
common  enemy  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party  and  the  Whig  Party,  that 
was  to  be  found  the  motive  which  governed  that  portion  of  the  former 
party  which  gave  me  its  votes.     I  refer  again  to  my  letter.     I  have 
seen  no  reason  to  change  the  opinions  there  expressed,  and  I  deeply 
regret  if,  in  communicating  these  opinions,  any  of  my  constituents 
have  been  misled. 

<  I  am,  gentlemen,  with  perfect  respect,  your  fellow-citizen, 

<  ED  WARD  CURTIS. 

'  To  Messrs.  John  A.  Riell,  Michael  Dougherty,  John  Bogert,  Thos. 
S.  Day,  and  Charles  Fox,  Esqrs.  Committee.' 

"  It  appears,  by  the  foregoing  letter,  that  the  said  Edward  Curtis 
refers  to  a  written  communication  and  statement  in  the  form  of  a  let- 
ter, dated  —  day  of  September,  1836,  and  which  was  delivered  by 
him  to  F.  Byrdsall,  Esq.,  the  then  Recording  Secretary,  at  the  mo- 
ment he  subscribed  the  Declaration  of  Principles,  and  which  was  by 
the  then  Recording  Secretary  to  be  communicated  to  the  party,  as  a 
qualification  of  his  assent.     Although  diligent  search  was  made  for 
the  letter  above  referred  to,  it  could  not  be  found  among  the  papers 
of  the  present  Recording  Secretary,  and  as  he  was  of  opinion  that  such 
letter  was  never  delivered  over  to  him  with  the  other  papers,  it  ap- 
peared to  your  committee  that  it  might  have  been  possibly  retained 
in  the  possession  of  the  late  Recording  Secretary.     Your  committee, 
through  their  chairman,  then. waited  upon  the  late  Recording  Secre- 
tary, and  received  from  him  the  letter  or  copy  of  the  original  letter 
above  referred  to,  by  the  said  Edward  Curtis,  which  copy  is  attested 
to  be  correct  by  communications  received  by  your  committee,  from 
Dr.  Alexander  F.  Vache  and  F.  Byrdsall,  by  letters  dated  the  27th 
October,  1837,  which  communications  satisfy  your  committee  that 
such  letter  as  above  referred  to,  by  the  said  Edward  Curtis,  was  re- 
ceived from  him,  as  in  his  letter  of  the  27th  of  October  last  past  is 
stated.     Your  committee  considered  it  to  be  a  part  of  their  duty  to  take 
a  copy  of  said  letter,  although  they  were,  and  are,  unwilling  to  re- 
ceive it  as  a  letter  properly  belonging  to  the  Equal  Rights  Party, 
which  for  reasons  hereafter  made  known,  appear  to  them  perfectly 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  183 

consistent,  plain,  and  satisfactory,  but  have  deemed  it  their  duty  to 
view  said  letter  as  a  mere  individual  communication,  addressed  by 
the  said  Edward  Curtis  to  the  late  Recording  Secretary,  with  which 
this  party  have  nothing  to  do,  no  further  than  as  it  is  necessary  to 
show  the  duplicity  and  traffic  (if  such  it  be),  as  practised  upon 
the  party  for  the  purpose  of  procuring  the  nomination  of  the  said 
Edward  Curtis,  as  a  candidate  of  the  party  to  the  Congress  of  the 
United  States,*  and  which  your  committee  are  of  opinion  should  ap- 
pear in  this  report,  in  order  to  develope  all  the  facts  of  the  case,  that 
the  party  may  be  fairly  enabled  to  ascertain  the  whole  truth,  and 
judge  correctly  of  all  the  evidence  which  has  been  received, — (see 
Utter,  chap.  6,  page  121),  which  letter,  in  the  opinion  of  your  com- 
mittee, is  very  evasive  and  altogether  unsatisfactory,  as  it  does  not 
meet,  or  even  pretend  to  answer,  the  principal  axioms  contained  in 
the  Declaration  of  Principles,  which  as  solid  truths  it  should  have 
done,  and  which  the  said  Edward  Curtis  as  in  duty  bound  ought  to 
have  done,  and  your  committee  believe  that,  if  report  be  true,  it  was 
very  properly  rejected  at  a  public  meeting  of  the  party,  as  unfit  to  be 
received  as  a  public  document.  The  committee  have  also  considered 
it  as  one  of  their  duties  to  refer  back  to  a  communication  addressed 
by  the  said  Edward  Curtis,  October  19,  1836,  to  Messrs.  Alexander 
F.  Vache,  F.  Byrdsall,  R.  R.  Jones,  John  Watkins,  and  A.  D.  Wil- 
s&h,  a  committee  who  were  instructed  to  inform  him,  the  said  Edward 
Curtis,  and  others,  of  his  and  their  nomination  as  members  of  Con- 
gress, and  to  submit  for  his  and  their  approval  the  Declaration  of 

*  If  the  charge  of  "  duplicity  and  traffic"  was  intended  to  impli- 
cate the  Recording  Secretary,  then  is  it  utterly  false.  He  has  never 
been  a  trafficking  politician  nor  an  office-seeker,  and  it  is  well  known 
that  this  much  cannot  be  averred  of  any  of  the  three  men  who  signed 
this  report.  No  man  in  the  Equal  Rights  Party  was  more  active  at 
meetings  in  "  procuring  the  nomination  of  Edward  Curtis,"  and  after- 
wards supporting  him  at  the  polls,  than  the  chairman  himself,  Mr. 
John  A.  Riell. 

There  were  indications  in  1836  that  the  Monopoly  Democracy  of 
the  city  would  again  nominate  their  favorite  candidate,  Mr.  Gideon 
Lee,  President  of  the  Leather  Manufacturer's  Bank,  and  a  stock- 
holder and  partizan  of  the  Bank  of  the  United  States.  Mr.  Curtis 
was  nominated  because  he  was  neither  a  bank  director  or  stockholder 
within  the  knowledge  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party,  and  because  he  had 
signed  the  Declaration  of  Principles.  He  was  supported,  because  he 
gave  the  most  solemn  assurances  to  the  party  in  his  great  speech  at 
Military  Hall,  on  4th  November,  and  because  there  was  no  other 
way  of  defeating  the  election  of  Gideon  Lee.  The  attempt  to  do 
this  the  year  before  with  a  Democrat,  Mr.  C.  G.  Ferris,  had  failed. 

There  is  nothing  in  this  world  of  so  much  importance  to  the  "  late 
Recording  Secretary"  as  his  own  self-respect,  and  he  has  not  forfeited 
any,  the  least  consideration  of  that  by  any  act,  word,  or  circumstance 
that  ever  took  place  between  him  and  Mr.  Curtis.  Every  gentleman 
will  understand  the  full  meaning  of  these  words  when  he  reads  them. 


184  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837. 

Rights,  adopted  by  the  state  convention  at  Utica,  September  15, 1836, 
with  the  following  questions,  (see  the  Democrat,  October  19,  1836, 
or  page  129  of  this  book).  From  all  the  information  obtained,  and 
the  correspondence  had  and  received,  your  committee  have  endeavored 
to  ascertain  and  expose  everything  doubtful  and  mysterious  in  con- 
nection with  the  affair  delegated  to  them,  and  which  seemed  appa- 
rent from  the  correspondence  they  have  had  with  the  said  Edward 
Curtis,  to  enable  them  to  penetrate  the  labyrinth,  and  elucidate  all 
concealed  or  hidden,  and  discover  the  whole  truth,  which  in  their 
opinion  they  have  brought  to  light.  The  committee  believe  that  the 
letter  alluded  to  by  the  said  Edward  Curtis,  a  copy  of  which  is  con- 
tained in  their  report,  was  rejected  as  a  public  document,  after  being 
read  before  a  public  meeting  of  the  party,  as  it  is  not  to  be  found  re- 
corded in  the  minutes  or  proceedings,  which  has  been  diligently  and 
faithfully  searched.  They  are,  therefore,  unwilling  to  receive  or  ac- 
knowledge it  as  the  property  of  the  party ;  but  as  its  contents  have 
been  by  them  duly  examined,  they  have  no  hesitation  in  declaring  it 
to  be  what  it  essentially  and  really  is,  viz. :  in  many  respects,  a  tissue 
of  absurdities,  and  on  the  whole,  a  miserabiy  devised,  though  cunning, 
subterfuge  and  trick,  such  as  could  not  have  emanated  from  any  man 
who  loves  justice  and  fair  dealing  in  preference  to  insidious  means 
and  arts,  which  cannot  corrupt  the  party,  though  it  may  men.  It  is, 
in  the  opinion  of  your  committee,  one  of  the  most  bare-faced  attempts 
at  deception  ever  practised  upon  any  political  party,  and  which  none 
but  a  political  cheat  and  deceiver  could  ever  invent  or  frame,  and  the 
men  who  were,  in  the  first  instance,  accessary  in  thus  palming  the 
author  of  such  a  letter  upon  a  party  whose  ostensible  object  was  con- 
stitutional reform,  owe  it  to  themselves,  the  party,  and  their  own 
honor,  to  come  forward  and  exonerate  themselves  from  all  culpability. 
In  conclusion,  your  committee,  upon  due  inquiries,  have  not  been  able 
to  discover  those  members  of  the  party,  if  any  there  ever  were/to 
whom  the  said  Edward  Curtis  refers  in  his  letter  as  having  said  to  a 
number  of  the  Whig  Nominating  Committee,  that  the  said  Edward 
Curtis  was  not  fully  committed  to  the  Equal  Rights  Party. 

JOHN  A.  RIELL, 

i  THOMAS  S.  DAY, 

M.  DOUGHERTY. 
"  New  York,  November  2,  1837." 

This  prolix  Report,  the  reader  will  readily  perceive  by 
its  tautological  verbiage,  was  drawn  up  by  some  small 
lawyer,  whose  digestion  is  probably  circuitous  and  te- 
dious. Two  of  the  men  who  signed  it  knew  little  or 
nothing,  personally,  of  the  circumstances  in  connection 
with  the  nomination  of  Edward  Curtis  ;  and  when  one  of 
the  two  who  would  not  sign  it,  and  who  knew  all  the 
circumstances,  attempted  in  public  meeting  to  vindicate 
the  "  late  Recording  Secretary,"  such  was  the  animosity 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  185 

of  the  Buffaloes  towards  the  Rumps,  that  he  was  not  suf- 
fered to  proceed.  The  Buffalo  section  met  in  the  great 
room  of  the  old  Military  and  Civic  Hotel,  while  the  Rump 
section  met  in  the  back  part  of  the  hotel,  below. 
The  belligerent  sections  were  wrathfully  opposed  to  each 
other  ;  but  the  indignant  sentiments  and  heroic  eloquence 
of  the  leaders  belong  more  to  the  Epic  than  to  the  historic. 
The  meeting  of  those  opposed  to  uniting  with  the  De- 
mocracy of  Tammany,  took  place,  according  to  the  notice 
already  inserted.  Strong  resolutions  were  passed,  adverse 
to  such  union.  But  as  those  who  called  themselves  un- 
contaminated  Loco-Focos  published  an  address  to  their 
fellow-citizens,  covering  the  whole  ground  they  stood 
upon,  the  whole  of  this  address  is  presented  to  the  reader. 

ADDRESS. 

FELLOW-CITIZENS — In  soliciting  your  votes  and  support  of  the 
genuine  Loco-Foco  or  Equal  Rights  ticket,  we  offer  a  few  remarks 
to  show  the  getting  up  of  the  spurious  or  half  Loco-Foco,  half  Tam- 
many ticket,  and  also  to  dissipate  the  delusion  which  is  circulating, 
that  the  whole  Equal  Rights  party  is  ensnared  into  the  net  of  the 
Tammany  Sachems. 

The  ticket  above  presented  to  the  suffrage  of  the  friends  of  Equal 
Rights  has  been  nominated  by  ward  and  county  meetings,  in  strict 
conformity  with  the  constitution  adopted  by  conventions  and  general 
meetings  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party.  The  candidates  were  corres- 
ponded with  by  a  special  committee ;  pledges  were  signed  by  the 
candidates  who  were  constitutionally  adopted  on  mutual  pledges  and 
public  compact  between  the  party  and  the  above  named  candidates. 

But  it  was  deemed  right  and  expedient  by  trading  politicians,  such 
men  as  are  a  pest  to  every  political  party,  to  appoint  a  conference 
committee  to  meet  a  similar  committee  from  Tammany  Hall,  in  or- 
der to  compromise,  bargain  and  convey  the  rights  of  freemen,  in  vio- 
lation of  the  constitution  of  the  Equal  Rights  Party,  and  in  bad  faith 
towards  the  men  duly  nominated  and  the  engagements  publicly  made. 
Will  it  be  believed  that  there  are  persons  pretending  to  moral  and 
political  honesty,  who  were  enthusiastic  in  adopting  certain  men  as 
their  candidates,  and  afterwards  equally  enthusiastic  in  demanding 
the  resignation  of  those  very  men,  in  order  to  substitute  Tammany 
nominations  in  their  stead  ?  Yet  such  is  the  fact.  The  acceptance 
of  the  Tammany  nomination  was  carried  by  a  shameful  disregard  of 
every  principle  of  political  integrity  and  the  plain  provisions  of  the 
constitution. 

Fellow-Citizens — The  Equal  Rights  Party  votes  are  not  in  the 
market  to  be  sold  by  trading  politicians.  The  elective  franchise  is 
inherited  from  revolutionary  patriots,  and  is  not  at  the  disposal  of 


186  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1836. 

committees  of  conference.  Individuals  or  committees  may  sell  them- 
selves and  « go  where  thrift  may  follow  fawning,'  but  they  have  no 
right  to  make  bargains  or  engagements  that  infringe  the  rights  of 
others.  Could  any  committee  of  conference,  chosen  by  Tammany  to 
meet  another  committee  of  conference  appointed  by  some  self-styled 
Loco  Focos,  make  an  agreement  to  bind  the  votes  or  to  change  at 
will  the  ticket  of  either  party  ?  Surely  not.  Such  committees  are 
preposterous  absurdities — impudent  assumptions,  that  no  good  Demo- 
crat would  take  part  in.  Why  then  were  those  committees  of  con- 
ference appointed,  and  at  such  late  period  ?  Because  Tammany 
believes  that  the  Loco  Focos,  as  a  matter  course,  will  follow  LEAD- 
ERS ;  and  therefore  the  votes  of  above  four  thousand  freemen  are  at 
the  disposal  of  a  committee,  or  the  four  dozen  wiseacres  that  ap- 
pointed it. 

The  original  members  of  the  Loco  Foco  party,  at  least  those  who 
have  constituted  its  strength  and  integrity  and  who  at  the  same  time 
are  least  publicly  known,  are  true  and  steadfast  to  the  principles,  the 
organization,  and  the  ticket  of  the  party.  The  following  few  self- 
evident  reasons  show  why  the  determination  to  sustain  the  pure  Loco- 
Foco  ticket  is  as  judicious  as  it  is  constitutional. 

1.  Our  party,  to  a  man,  are  in  favor  of  President  Van  Buren's 
great  measure,  ( the  divorce  of  Bank  and  State,'  and  are  anxious  to 
apply  the  doctrines  to  State  practice,  knowing  there  is  far  greater 
need  of  reform  in  our  State  administration  at  this  time  than  there  ever 
was  in  the  general  government. 

2.  The  nominal  Democrats  of  the  State  administration,  declared 
(through  the  Albany  county  resolutions)  their  intention  of  pursuing 
their  old  policy  and  fostering  the  « State  Institutions,'  and  lhat  they 
had  nothing  in  common  with  the  new-fangled  radical  [Loco  Foco] 
spirit  of  the  day ;  and  eulogized  the  wise,  honest,  and  patriotic  con- 
duct of  Gov.  Marcy — by  whose  counsel  and  indefatigable  personal 
and  official  exertions  the  Suspension  Act  was  driven  through  the 
forms  of  legislation,  and  became  a  law  in  two  days  !     This  patriotic 
conduct  of  a  pretended  Democratic  Governor  and  Legislature,  will 
long  be  remembered  by  every  poor  man  in  this  city ;  for  in  less  than 
two  weeks  from  the  passage  of  that  act,  Flour  had  in  consequence 
risen  two  dollars  and  a  half  on  the  barrel,  while  a  general  stagnation 
of  business  immediately  ensued. 

3.  The  different  wards  in  the  city  were  called  together  to  appoint 
their  nominating  committees,  as  the  "  Friends  of  the  State  Adminis- 
tration."   The  men  who  sanction  any  atrocity,  if  perpetrated  under 
the  mask  of  Democracy,  can  feel  but  little  respect  for  Equality  of 
Rights,  when  they  approve  a  Suspension  Act  which,  besides  its  other 
enormities,  involves  the  crime  of  perjury  on  those  who  voted  fer  it. 
On  the  Tammany  ticket,  as  first  nominated,  stood  one  of  the  very 
men  who  voted  for  that  infamous  law  !     He  has  since  resigned. 

4.  No  permanent  good  can  be  expected  from  the  Democratic  party 
in  this  city,  unless  a  radical  Democratic  change  takes  place  in  its  or- 
ganization, through  which  the  wishes  of  the  people  will  be  obeyed, 
instead  of  the  present  vicious  system,  which  virtually  gives  to  a  few 
a  despotic  and  irresponsible  power. 


1837.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  187 

5.  We  well  know,  no  reformation  can  be  expected  among  "  the 
leaders,"  while  they  can  command  lucrative  official  patronage. 

Without  amplifying  these  reasons,  or  extending  their  number,  we 
submit  the  case  to  the  dispassionate  judgment  of  our  Democratic  fel- 
low-citizens, believing  they  cannot  but  feel  the  necessity  of  com- 
mencing and  carrying  out  the  great  reforms  advocated  by  the  Equal 
Rights  party,  and  to  which  their  candidates  are  pledged. 

The  following  Ticket  was  supported  at  the  election  by 
those  who  issued  the  foregoing  address : — 

For  Assembly. 

ROBERT  TOWNSEND,  JR.,  Carpenter. 
JOB  HASKELL,  Carman. 
WARDEN  HAYWARD,  Agent. 
CHARLES  DINGLEY,  Music  Printer. 
JOHN  WILDER,  Ship-joiner. 
HUGH  COLLINS,  Carpenter. 
DANIEL  GORHAM,  Tailor. 
JOHN  H.  HUNT,  Printer. 
CHARLES  F.  WAY,  Blacksmith. 
LEVI  D.  SLAMM,  Locksmith. 
JAMES  L.  STRATTON,  Painter. 
WILLIAM  E.  SKIDMORE,  Grocer 

For  Sheriff. 
JAMES  LOCKLIN,  Tailor. 

For  County  Clerk. 
THOMAS  S.  WALSH,  JR.,  Grocer. 

For  Coroner. 
ABRAHAM  D.  WILSON,  Physician. 

The  election  took  place  soon  afterwards.  Job  Haskell 
obtained  371  votes;  the  other  candidates  not  nominated 
at  Tammany  Hall,  received  a  lesser  number.  But  the 
men  who  supported  the  above  ticket,  honorably  performed 
their  engagements  to  the  candidates  they  had  nominated. 
The  Union,  or  Tammany  Loco-Foco  Ticket,  did  not  suc- 
ceed j  consequently,  no  advantage  resulted  from  the  re- 
union of  the  democracy,  so  far  as  the  election  is  con- 
sidered. There  would  have  been  nothing  lost  by  acting 
in  good  faith. 


188  HISTORY  OF  THE  [1837, 

But  the  consummation  of  the  foregone  conclusion  of 
the  Equal  Rights  party  had  yet  to  be  accomplished,  and 
Mr.  Slamm  was  chosen  to  be  the  executioner  of  the  final 
act,  by  those  who  conspired  for  the  purpose.  Soon  after 
the  November  election,  he  was  elected  Recording  Secre- 
tary ;  and  it  became  his  duty,  under  the  constitution,  to 
call  the  monthly  and  special  meetings  of  the  Equal 
Rights  party,  the  more  particularly  as  he  and  his  asso- 
ciates had  procured  the  passage  of  a  resolution,  on  the 
31st  October,  declaring  all  meetings  not  called  by  the 
Recording  Secretary,  unconstitutional.  But  there  is  no 
record  that  he  ever  called  a  monthly  meeting  of  the 
party  according  to  the  constitution  under  which  he  was 
elected,  for  six  months,  and  thus  no  meetings  were  held. 

Gradually,  the  Loco-Focos  of  both  sections  became 
merged  in  the  Democratic  Republican  party,  and  they 
brought  not  only  their  "  new  fangled  notions"  with  them, 
but  also  their  significant  designation  as  a  party.  The 
glory  of  the  Military  and  Civic  Hotel  departed  with  the 
Loco-Focos.  There  were  no  more  meetings  held  there 
by  those  enthusiasts,  and  no  enthusiastic  cheers  resound- 
ing within  its  walls ;  neither  was  there  any  more  trans- 
parencies with  terse  mottoes  and  inscriptions,  to  adorn 
the  venerable  casements.  The  old  mansion  became  de- 
serted and  cheerless ;  for  there  was  only  one  Loco-Foco, 
Robert  Hogbin,  who  made  it  his  haunt  as  usual.  He 
was  the  last  of  the  political  covenanters,  and  the  only 
one  who  went  there  regularly,  month  after  month,  on  the 
evenings  appointed  by  the  constitution  for  the  meetings 
of  the  faithful ;  and  he  would  bide  there,  solitary  and 
alone,  until  ten  o'clock,  the  hope  within  him  that  the 
Loco-Focos  would  gather  themselves  together  in  the  Ba- 
bylon of  their  captivity,  in  order  to  direct  their  steps 
back  again  to  the  renewal  of  their  venerable  temple. 
But  they  never  returned.  The  old  Military  and  Civic 
Hotel  fell  into  decay,  and  at  length  was  pulled  down. 
Poor  Hogbin  saw  it  lying  prostrate  in  its  last  ruins,  and 
he  turned  away  and  wept. 


1836.]  LOCO-FOCO  PARTY.  189 

But  Loco-Focoism  did  not  die.  It  lives  forever  in 
Christian  Democracy, — that  Democracy  which,  while  it 
concedes  to  the  majority  the  powers  of  government,  does 
not  allow  to  it  the  right  to  do  wrong,  but  restrains  it  by 
constitutions  drawn  from  the  paramount  laws  of  God,  and 
the  principles  of  Christianity. 

APPENDIX. 

The  following  is  the  Gilpinade  Ballad)  mentioned  page  133. 

THE  ASSEMBLY'S  VENGEANCE  AGAINST  WILFUL  CONTEMPT: 
A  MAEVELLOUS  DITTY, 

TELLING  HOW  THE  HOUSE  OF  ASSEMBLY  WAS  WICKEDLY  CONTEMNED 
BY  MOSES  JAQUES  AND  LEVI  D.  SLAMM  ;  AND  HOW  SAID  CONTEM- 
NERS  WERE  SCOLDED  AND  REPRIMANDED  THEREFOR. 

Down  to  the  city  of  New- York, 

Past  houses,  fields,  and  farms, 
Swift  came  that  mighty  officer, 

Th5  Assembly's  Man-at-Arms. 
And  when  he  reached  the  City  Hall, 

He  look-ed  all  around ; — 
«  I  want  the  Sheriff,  quick,"  quoth  he, 

"  Where  is  he  to  be  found  ?" 
A  Sachem  of  the  tribes  then  spoke, 

The  tribes  of  Tammany, 
"  Behold,  I  am  the  Sheriff  here, 

What  do  you  want  with  me  ?" 
"  What  do  I  want !  oh  horrible  ! 

Have  you  not  heard  nor  dreamt  ? 
The  House,  the  House  at  Albany 

Is  treated  with  contempt !" 
"  Two  Loco-Focos  of  this  place 

Have  scorned  its  digni-ty ; 
Levi  D.  Slamm,  and  Moses  Jaques, 

And  they  must  go  with  me." 
"  So  haste,  sir  Sheriff,  seek  them  out 

Ere  set  of  evening's  sun ; 
For  they  must  be  in  Albany 

Before  three  days  are  done." 
The  Sheriff  bowed  to  the  black  rod, 

And  both  set  out  straightway ; 
They  found  and  seized  on  Slamm  and  Jaques 

About  the  close  of  day. 


190  APPENDIX. 

Next  morn  they  were  upon  the  road, 

Despite  of  snow  or  rain  ; 
And  driver,  whip,  and  horse,  and  wheel, 

Were  going  might  and  main. 

And  when  they  reached  the  old  toll-bridge, 

The  toll-man  felt  alarms ; 
"  What  is  the  matter,  sir  ?"  quoth  he, 

Unto  the  Man-at-Arms. 

"  What  is  the  matter  ?"    «  Horrible ! 

Have  you  not  heard  nor  dreamt  ? 
The  House — the  House  at  Albany 

Is  treated  with  contempt !" 

On,  on,  they  hied,  o'er  hill  and  dale ; 

And  every  one  they  passed 
Cried  out  aghast,  "  good  heavens  and  earth  ! 

Why  do  you  go  so  fast  ?" 

"  Why  go  so  fast  ?     Oh  horrible  ! 

Have  you  not  heard  nor  dreamt  ? 
The  House,  where  banks  and  stocks  are  made, 

Is  treated  with  contempt !" 

And  as  they  galloped  through  the  towns, 

The  dogs  all  barked  aloud : 
"  What  is  the  news  ? — what  is  the  news  ?" — 

Cried  out  the  wondering  crowd. 

"  What  is  the  news  !     Oh  horrible  ! — 
Have  you  not  heard  nor  dreamt  ? 

The  House — where  rights  are  made  and  sold, 
Is  treated  with  contempt !" 

And  great  is  all  the  Members'  rage, 
And  great  their  grief  and  sore  ; 

I  wot  their  streaming  eyes  have  shed 
A  pint  of  tears  or  more. 

And  there  will  be  no  peace  on  earth, 

Until  it  vengeance  takes ; 
It  must  inflict  its  digni-ty 

On  these  men  Slamm  and  Jaques." 

At  length  they  reached  the  Capitol, 
And  there  they  were  arraigned 

Before  the  Speaker  and  the  House, 
Whose  summons  they  disdained. 

Busy-body  Hackley  felt 

A  strange  "  exigency" — 
What  legal  nostrums  had  they  bought  ? 

Their  lawyer,  who  was  he  ? 


APPENDIX.  191 


The  great  Investigator  rose ; 

George  Patterson  by  name, 
Who  fancied  every  Jemmy  Kent, 

A  Chancellor  of  fame. 

"  By  heavens  !"  cried  he,  "  these  men  have  shown 

To  my  subpoena  scorn, 
For  which  contempt  unto  this  House, 

They'd  better  ne'er  been  born." 

Then  Bank-director  Talmage  rose, 

A  man  not  overwise, 
Chosen  for  his  stupidity, 

The  Banks  to  scrutinize. 

Says  he,  "  God  bless  the  safety  league 

Of  State  Banks,  one  and  all ! 
These  Loco-Focos,  or  the  Banks, 

One  of  the  two  must  fall. 

"  No  constitutions  can  rule  us, 

We  are  the  people  here ; 
As  God  rules  all  in  heaven  above — 

We  rule  on  earth,  'tis  clear !" 

Tom  Tucker  rose  with  majesty, 

A  man  of  awful  sense, 
An  orator  of  mighty  pith, 

Of  bank-nursed  eloquence. 

Quoth  he,  "  I  am  indignant  that 

Our  power  should  be  twitted ;  * 
If  we  make  terms  with  guilty  men, 

Our  honor's  compromitted !" 

Up  rose  fop  Burroughs  on  his  legs ; 

A  petty  bantam  noodle — 
Quoth  he,  «  let's  send  them  both  to  jail," 

Hey,  cock  a  doodle  doodle  ! ! 

"  Send  them  to  jail,"  cried  big  Westlake, 

A  'Tater  Broker  small ; 
While  some  slunk  off  like  Tom  Herttell— 

Who  nothing  said  at  all. 

The  members  rose  in  great  uproar, 

And  this  was  their  command  ; 
"  We  must  annihilate  these  men 

With  our  dread  reprimand." 

The  prisoners  shrunk  to  nothingness, 

Which  no  one  should  surprise; 
The  me)mbers  swelled  with  dignity 

To  twice  their  usual  size. 


192  APPENDIX.  [1837. 

Contempt's  dark  stain  upon  their  beaks, 

The  gobblers  could  not  stand, 
Wherefore  their  Speaker  solemnly 

Read  off  this 

REPRIMAND. 

"  Oh  Moses  Jaques  !  Oh  Moses  Jaques ! 

'Tis  painful  and  'tis  true, 
A  caucus  of  the  Regency 

Imposed  the  task  I  do." 

"  Your  condemnation  by  this  House, 

Last  night  was  cut  and  dried ; — 
(Alas  !  I'm  but  a  puppet  here, 

With  all  ray  pomp  and  pride)."  [Aside. 

"  Our  mandate  you  did  treat  with  scorn, 

Which  touches  us  quite  near ; 
We're  jealous  of  our  privilege, — 

We  hold  it  but  one  year. 
"  You're  old  and  educated,  sir, 

As  all  can  plainly  see ; 
Besides,  like  us,  you  hold  large  stakes 

In  this  communi-ty. 

"  Then  why  uphold  the  rights  of  those 

Who  own  no  stakes  at  all  ? 
You're  one  of  us  :  why  should  you  care  ? 

Let  workies  rise  or  fall ! 

"And  as  for  you,  Levi  D.  Slamm, 

You've  intellect,  'tis  plain  ; 
Apply  it  to  wise  purposes, 

Where  profit  you  can  gain. 

"  Subserve  the  views  of  wealthy  men, 

Like  us,  who  have  large  stakes  ; 
Make  interest  your  politics — 

Don't  be  like  Moses  Jaques. 

"  Now,  in  obedience  to  the  House, 

To  which  I'm  nothing  loth, 
I  here  retrieve  our  dignity, 

And  reprimand  you  both." 

And  thus  did  end  this  woful  farce, 

Conceived  in  wrath  and  trouble ; 
And  never  en  this  earth  before, 

Did  burst  so  big  a  bubble. 

Long  live  our  legislators  all, 

Of  high  or  low  degree  ; 
And  when  they  next  scold  Slamm  and  Jaques, 

May  I  be  there  to  see  I 


• 


PLEASE  DO  NOT  REMOVE 
CARDS  OR  SLIPS  FROM  THIS  POCKET 

UNIVERSITY  OF  TORONTO  LIBRARY 


Byrdsall,   Fitzwilliam 
2321  The  history  of  the  Loco- 

A6B9  foco,    or  Equal  Rights  Party, 

its  movements,   conventions 

and  proceedings