Skip to main content

Full text of "A history of magic and experimental science"

See other formats


A 
HISTORY  OF  MAGIC  AND 
EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 


VOLUME  I 


A 
HISTORY  OF  MAGIC  AND 
EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

DURING  THE  FIRST  THIRTEEN 
CENTURIES  OF  OUR  ERA 

BY  LYNN  THORNDIKE 


VOLUME  I 


COLUMBIA  UNIVERSITY  PRESS 
NEW  YORK  AND  LONDON 


Copyright  1923  Columbia  University  Press 
First  published  by  The  Macmillan  Company  1923 


ISBN  0-231-08794-2 
Manufactured  in  the  United  States  of  America 
10  9  8  7 


CONTENTS 

PAGE 

Preface •    -.r.    ,  ix 

Abbreviations xiii 

Designation  of  Manuscripts xv 

List  of  Works  Frequently  Cited  by  Author  and  Date  of 

Publication  or  Brief  Title xvii 

CHAPTER 

I.    Introduction i 


BOOK  I.    THE  ROMAN  EMPIRE 

Foreword 39 

2.  Pliny's  Natural  History 41 

I,  Its  Place  in  the  History  of  Science 42 

11.  Its  Experimental  Tendency 53 

HI.  Pliny's  Account  of  Magic 58 

IV.  The  Science  of  the  Magi 64 

V.  Pliny's  Magical  Science 72 

3.  Seneca  and  Ptolemy:  Natural  Divination  and  As- 

trology       100 

4.  Galen 117 

I.  The  Man  and  His  Times 119 

II.  His  Medicine  and  Experimental  Science  .     .     .  139 

HI.  His  Attitude  Tovi^ard  Magic 165 

5.  Ancient   Applied    Science   and   Magic:   Vitruvius, 

Hero,  and  the  Greek  Alchemists 182 

6.  Plutarch's   Essays 200 

7.  Apuleius  of  Mad  aura 221 

8.  Philostratus's  Life  of  Apollonius  of  Tyana  .     .     .  242 

9.  Literary  and  Philosophical  Attacks  upon  Supersti- 

tion :  Cicero,  Favorinus,  Sextus  Empiricus,  Lucian  268 

TO.    Spurious  Mystic  Writings  of  Hermes,  Orpheus,  and 

Zoroaster 287 

T 


vi  CONTENTS 

CHAPTER  PAGB 

n.    Neo-Platonism  and  Its  Relations  to  Astrology  and 

Theurgy 298 

12.  Aelian,  Solinus,  and  Horapollo 322 

BOOK  II.    EARLY  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT 

Foreword 337 

13.  The  Book  of  Enoch 340 

14.  Philo  Judaeus 348 

15.  The  Gnostics 360 

16.  The  Christian   Apocrypha 385 

17.  The  Recognitions  of  Clement  and  Simon  Magus     .  400 

18.  The  Confession  of  Cyprian  and  Some  Similar  Stories  428 

19.  Origen  and  Celsus 436 

20.  Other  Christian  Discussion  of  Magic  Before  Augus- 

tine       462 

21.  Christianity  and  Natural  Science:  Basil,  Epipha- 

Nius,  and  the  Physiologus 480 

22.  Augustine  on  Magic  and  Astrology 504 

23.  The  Fusion  of  Pagan  and  Christian  Thought  in 

the  Fourth  and  Fifth  Centuries 523 

BOOK  III.  THE  EARLY  MIDDLE  AGES 

24.  The  Story  of  Nectanebus,  or  the  Alexander  Legend 

in  the  Early  Middle  Ages 551 

25.  Post-Classical  Medicine 566 

26.  Pseudo-Literature  in  Natural  Science     ....  594 

27.  Other  Early  Medieval  Learning:  Boethius,  Isidore, 

Bede,  Gregory 616 

28.  Arabic  Occult  Science  of  the  Ninth  Century     .     .  641 

29.  Latin  Astrology  and  Divination,  Especially  in  the 

Ninth,  Tenth,  and  Eleventh  Centuries     .     .     .  672 

30.  Gerbert  and  the  Introduction  of  Arabic  Astrology  697 

31.  Anglo-Saxon,  Salernitan  and  Other  Latin  Medi- 

cine   IN    Manuscripts    from    the    Ninth    to   the 

Twelfth  Century 719 

32.  Constantinus  Africanus  (c.  ioi 5-1087)     ....  742 

33.  Treatises  on  the  Arts  Before  the  Introduction  of 

Arabic  Alchemy 760 

34.  Marbod 775 

Indices: 

General 7^3 

Bibliographical 811 

Manuscripts 831 


CONTENTS  vU 


BOOK  IV.    THE  TWELFTH  CENTURY 

CHAPTER  PAGB 

35.  The  Early  Scholastics:  Peter  Abelard  and  Hugh 

OF  St.  Victor 3 

36.  Adelard  of  Bath 14 

37.  William  of  Conches 50 

38.  Some   Twelfth    Century   Translators,    Chiefly   of 

Astrology  from  the  Arabic 66 

39.  Bernard  Silvester;  Astrology  and  Geomancy     .     .  99 

40.  Saint  Hildegard  of  Bingen 124 

41.  John  of  Salisbury 155 

42.  Daniel  of  Morley  and  Roger  of  Hereford  ....  171 

43.  Alexander  Neckam  on  the  Natures  of  Things    .     .  188 

44.  Moses  Maimonides 205 

45.  Hermetic  Books  in  the  Middle  Ages 214 

46.  Kiranides 229 

47.  Prester  John  and  the  Marvels  of  India    ....  236 

48.  The  Pseudo-Aristotle 246 

49.  Solomon  and  the  Ars  Notoria 279 

50.  Ancient  and  Medieval  Dream-Books 290 

BOOK  V.    THE  THIRTEENTH  CENTURY 

Forev^ord 305 

51.  Michael  Scot 307 

52.  William  of  Auvergne 338 

53.  Thomas  of  Cantimpre 372 

54.  Bartholomew  of  England 401 

55.  Robert  Grosseteste 436 

56.  Vincent  of  Beauvais 457 

57.  Early  Thirteenth    Century   Medicine:   Gilbert  of 

England  and  William  of  England 477 

58.  Petrus   Hispanus 488 

59.  Albertus  Magnus 5^7 

I.  Life 521 

II.  As  a  Scientist 528 

HI,  His  Allusions  to  Magic 548 

IV.  Marvelous  Virtues  in  Nature 560 

V.  Attitude  Toward  Astrology 577 


viii  CONTENTS 

CHAPTER  PAGE 

60.  Thomas  Aquinas 593 

61.  Roger  Bacon 616 

I.  Life 619 

II.  Criticism  of  and  Part  in  Medieval  Learning     .  630 

III.  Experimental  Science 649 

IV.  Attitude  Toward  Magic  and  Astrology    .     .     .  659 

62.  The  Speculum  Astronomiae 692 

6^.    Three  Treatises  Ascribed  to  Albert 720 

64.  Experiments  and  Secrets:  Medical  and  Biological  .  751 

65.  Experiments  and  Secrets  :  Chemical  and  Magical    .  777 

66.  PiCATRIX 813 

67.  GUIDO  BONATTI  AND  BARTHOLOMEW  OF  PaRMA      .       .       .  825 

68.  Arnald  of  Villanova 841 

69.  Raymond  Lull 862 

70.  Peter  of  Abano 874 

71.  Cecco  d'Ascoli 948 

72.  Conclusion 969 

Indices  : 

General 985 

Bibliographical 1007 

Manuscripts    ......••••••■.  1027 


PREFACE 

This  work  has  been  long  in  preparation — ever  since  in 
1902-1903  Professor  James  Harvey  Robinson,  when  my 
mind  was  still  in  the  making,  suggested  the  study  of  magic 
in  medieval  universities  as  the  subject  of  my  thesis  for  the 
master's  degree  at  Columbia  University — and  has  been 
foreshadowed  by  other  publications,  some  of  which  are 
listed  under  my  name  in  the  preliminary  bibliography. 
Since  this  was  set  up  in  type  there  have  also  appeared: 
"Galen  :  the  Man  and  His  Times,"  in  The  Scientific  Monthly, 
January,  1922;  "Early  Christianity  and  Natural  Science," 
in  The  Biblical  Review,  July,  1922;  "The  Latin  Pseudo- 
Aristotle  and  Medieval  Occult  Science,"  in  The  Journal  of 
English  and  Germanic  Philology,  April,  1922 ;  and  notes  on 
Daniel  of  Morley  and  Gundissalinus  in  The  English  His- 
torical Review.  For  permission  to  make  use  of  these  pre- 
vious publications  in  the  present  work  I  am  indebted  to  the 
editors  of  the  periodicals  just  mentioned,  and  also  to  the 
editors  of  The  Columbia  University  Studies  in  History, 
Economics,  and  Public  Law,  The  American  Historical  Re- 
view, Classical  Philology,  The  Monist,  Nature,  The  Philo- 
sophical Review,  and  Science.  The  form,  however,  of  these 
previous  publications  has  often  been  altered  in  embodying 
them  in  this  book,  and,  taken  together,  they  constitute  but 
a  fraction  of  it.  Book  I  greatly  amplifies  the  account  of 
magic  in  the  Roman  Empire  contained  in  my  doctoral  dis- 
sertation. Over  ten  years  ago  I  prepared  an  account  of 
magic  and  science  in  the  twelfth  and  thirteenth  centuries 
based  on  material  available  in  print  in  libraries  of  this 
country  and  arranged  topically,  but  I  did  not  publish  it,  as  it 
seemed  advisable  to  supplement  it  by  study  abroad  and  of 
the  manuscript  material,  and  to  adopt  an  arrangement  by 
authors.    The  result  is  Books  IV  and  V  of  the  present  work. 

My  examination  of  manuscripts  has  been  done  especially 
at  the  British  Museum,  whose  rich  collections,  perhaps  be- 
cause somewhat  inaccessibly  catalogued,  have  been  less  used 
by  students  of  medieval  learning  than  such  libraries  as  the 


X  PREFACE 

Bodleian  and  Bibliotheque  Nationale.  I  have  worked  also, 
however,  at  both  Oxford  and  Paris,  at  Munich,  Florence, 
Bologna,  and  elsewhere ;  but  it  has  of  course  been  impossible 
to  examine  all  the  thousands  of  manuscripts  bearing  upon 
the  subject,  and  the  war  prevented  me  from  visiting  some 
libraries,  such  as  the  important  medieval  collection  of  Am- 
plonius  at  Erfurt.  However,  a  fairly  wide  survey  of  the 
catalogues  of  collections  of  manuscripts  has  convinced  me 
that  I  have  read  a  representative  selection.  Such  classified 
lists  of  medieval  manuscripts  as  Mrs.  Dorothea  Singer 
has  undertaken  for  the  British  Isles  should  greatly  facilitate 
the  future  labors  of  investigators  in  this  field. 

Although  working  in  a  rather  new  field,  I  have  been  aided 
by  editions  of  medieval  writers  produced  by  modern 
scholarship,  and  by  various  series,  books,  and  articles  tend- 
ing, at  least,  in  the  same  direction  as  mine.  Some  such 
publications  have  appeared  or  come  to  my  notice  too  late 
for  use  or  even  for  mention  in  the  text :  for  instance,  another 
edition  of  the  De  medicamentis  of  Marcellus  Empiricus  by 
M.  Niedermann;  the  printing  of  the  Twelve  Experiments 
with  Snake  skin  of  John  Paulinus  by  J.  W.  S.  Johnsson  in 
Bull.  d.  I.  societe  frang.  d^hist.  d.  I.  med.,  XII,  257-67;  the 
detailed  studies  of  Sante  Ferrari  on  Peter  of  Abano;  and 
A.  Franz,  Die  kirchlichen  Benediktionen  im  Mittelalter, 
1909,  2  vols.  The  breeding  place  of  the  eel  (to  which  I 
allude  at  I,  491)  is  now,  as  a  result  of  recent  investigation  by 
Dr.  J.  Schmidt,  placed  "about  2500  miles  from  the  mouth 
of  the  English  Channel  and  500  miles  north-east  of  the 
Leeward  Islands"  {Discovery,  Oct.,  1922,  p.  256)  instead 
of  in  the  Mediterranean. 

A  man  who  once  wrote  in  Dublin  *  complained  of  the 
difficulty  of  composing  a  learned  work  so  far  from  the 
Bodleian  and  British  Museum,  and  I  have  often  felt  the 
same  way.  When  able  to  visit  foreign  collections  or  the 
largest  libraries  in  this  country,  or  when  books  have  been 
sent  for  my  use  for  a  limited  period,  I  have  spent  all  the 
available  time  in  the  collection  of  material,  which  has  been 
written  up  later  as  opportunity  offered.  Naturally  one  then 
finds  many  small  and  some  important  points  which  require 
verification  or  further  investigation,  but  which  must  be 
postponed  until  one's  next  vacation  or  trip  abroad,  by  which 
time  some  of  the  smaller  points  are  apt  to  be  forgotten. 
*  H.  Cotton,  Five  Books  of  Maccabees,  1832,  pp.  ix-x. 


PREFACE  xi 

Of  such  loose  threads  I  fear  that  more  remain  than  could 
be  desired.  And  I  have  so  often  caught  myself  in  the  act  of 
misinterpretation,  misplaced  emphasis,  and  other  mistakes, 
that  I  have  no  doubt  there  are  other  errors  as  w^ell  as 
omissions  which  other  scholars  will  be  able  to  point  out  and 
which  I  trust  they  will.  Despite  this  prospect,  I  have  been 
bold  in  affirming  my  independent  opinion  on  any  point 
where  I  have  one,  even  if  it  conflicts  with  that  of  specialists 
or  puts  me  in  the  position  of  criticizing  my  betters.  Con- 
stant questioning,  criticism,  new  points  of  view,  and  conflict 
of  opinion  are  essential  in  the  pursuit  of  truth. 

After  some  hesitation  I  decided,  because  of  the  expense, 
the  length  of  the  work,  and  the  increasing  unfamiliarity  of 
readers  with  Greek  and  Latin,  as  a  rule  not  to  give  in  the 
footnotes  the  original  language  of  passages  used  in  the 
text.  I  have,  however,  usually  supplied  the  Latin  or  Greek 
when  I  have  made  a  free  translation  or  one  with  which  I 
felt  that  others  might  not  agree.  But  in  such  cases  I  advise 
critics  not  to  reject  my  rendering  utterly  without  some  fur- 
ther examination  of  the  context  and  line  of  thought  of  the 
author  or  treatise  in  question,  since  the  wording  of  particu- 
lar passages  in  texts  and  manuscripts  is  liable  to  be  corrupt, 
and  since  my  purpose  in  quoting  particular  passages  is  to 
illustrate  the  general  attitude  of  the  author  or  treatise.  In 
describing  manuscripts  I  have  employed  quotation  marks 
when  I  knew  from  personal  examination  or  otherwise  that 
the  Latin  was  that  of  the  manuscript  itself,  and  have 
omitted  quotation  marks  where  the  Latin  seemed  rather  to 
be  that  of  the  description  in  the  catalogue.  Usually  I  have 
let  the  faulty  spelling  and  syntax  of  medieval  copyists  stand 
without  comment.  But  as  I  am  not  an  expert  in  palaeog- 
raphy and  have  examined  a  large  number  of  manuscripts 
primarily  for  their  substance,  the  reader  should  not  regard 
my  Latin  quotations  from  them  as  exact  transliterations  or 
carefully  considered  texts.  He  should  also  remember  that 
th-ere  is  little  uniformity  in  the  manuscripts  themselves. 
I  have  tried  to  reduce  the  bulk  of  the  footnotes  by  the 
briefest  forms  of  reference  consistent  with  clearness — con- 
sult lists  of  abbreviations  and  of  works  frequently  cited  by 
author  and  date  of  publication — and  by  use  of  appendices 
at  the  close  of  certain  chapters. 

Within  the  limits  of  a  preface  I  may  not  enumerate  all 
the  libraries  where  I  have  been  permitted  to  work  or  which 


xii  PREFACE 

have  generously  sent  books — sometimes  rare  volumes — to 
Cleveland  for  my  use,  or  all  the  librarians  who  have  person- 
ally assisted  my  researches  or  courteously  and  carefully  an- 
swered my  written  inquiries,  or  the  other  scholars  who  have 
aided  or  encouraged  the  preparation  of  this  work,  but  I 
hope  they  may  feel  that  their  kindness  has  not  been  in  vain. 
In  library  matters  I  have  perhaps  most  frequently  imposed 
upon  the  good  nature  of  Mr,  Frederic  C.  Erb  of  the  Co- 
lumbia  University   Library,    Mr.    Gordon  W.    Thayer,    in 
charge  of  the  John  G.  White  collection  in  the  Cleveland 
Public  Library,  and  Mr.   George   F.   Strong,  librarian   of 
Adelbert  College,  Western  Reserve  University;  and  I  cannot 
forbear  to  mention  the  interest  shown  in  my  work  by  Dr. 
R.  L.  Poole  at  the  Bodleian.     For  letters  facilitating  my 
studies  abroad  before  the  war  or  application  for  a  passport 
immediately   after   the   war   I    am   indebted   to   the   Hon. 
Philander  C.  Knox,  then  Secretary  of  State,  to  Frederick 
P.   Keppel,  then  Assistant   Secretary  of  War,  to  Drs.  J. 
Franklin  Jameson  and  Charles  F.  Thwing,  and  to  Professors 
Henry  E.   Bourne  and  Henry  Crew.     Professors   C.   H. 
Haskins,^  L.  C.  Karpinski,  W.  G.  Leutner,  W.  A,  Locy, 
D.  B.  Macdonald,  L.  J.  Paetow,  S.  B.  Platner,  E.  C.  Rich- 
ardson,  James   Harvey   Robinson,    David   Eugene   Smith, 
D'Arcy  W.  Thompson,  A.  H.  Thorndike,  E.  L.  Thorndike, 
T.  Wingate  Todd,  and  Hutton  Webster,  and  Drs.  Charles 
Singer  and  Se  Boyar  have  kindly  read  various  chapters  in 
manuscript  or  proof  and  offered  helpful  suggestions.     The 
burden  of  proof-reading  has  been  generously  shared  with 
me  by  Professors  B.  P.  Bourland,  C.  D.  Lamberton,  and 
Walter  Libby,  and  especially  by  Professor  Harold  North 
Fowler  who  has  corrected  proof  for  practically  the  entire 
work.     After  receiving  such  expert  aid  and  sound  counsel 
I  must  assume  all  the  deeper  guilt  for  such  faults  and  indis- 
cretions as  the  book  may  display. 

*  But  Professor  Haskins'  recent  article  in  Isis  on  "Michael  Scot  and 
Frederick  11"  and  my  chapter  on  Michael  Scot  were  written  quite 
independently. 


ABBREVIATIONS 


Abhandl.  Abhandlungen  zur  Geschichte  der  Mathema- 
tischen  Wissenschaften,  begrundet  von  M. 
Cantor,  Teubner,  Leipzig. 

Addit.  Additional  Manuscripts  in  the  British  Museum. 

Amplon,  Manuscript  collection  of  Amplonius  Ratinck  at 
Erfurt. 

AN  Ante-Nicene  Fathers,  American  Reprint  of  the 

Edinburgh  edition,  in  9  vols.,  191 3. 

AS  Acta  sanctorum. 

Beitrage  Beitrage  zur  Geschichte  der  Philosophie  des 
Mittelalters,  ed.  by  C,  Baeumker,  G.  v.  Hert- 
ling,  M.  Baumgartner,  et  al.,  Miinster,  1891-. 

BL  Bodleian  Library,  Oxford, 

BM  British  Museum,  London. 

BN  Bibliotheque  Nationale,  Paris. 

Borgnet  Augustus  Borgnet,  ed.  B.  Alberti  Magni  Opera 
omnia,  Paris,  1890- 1899,  in  38  vols. 

Brewer  Fr.  Rogeri  Bacon  Opera  quaedam  hactenus  in- 
edita,  ed.  J.  S.  Brewer,  London,  1859,  in  RS, 
XV, 

Bridges  The  Opus  Maius  of  Roger  Bacon,  ed,  J.  H. 
Bridges,  I-II,  Oxford,  1897;  III,  1900, 

CCAG  Catalogus  codicum  astrologorum  Graecorum,  ed. 
F.  Cumont,  W.  Kroll,  F.  Boll,  et  al.,  1898, 

CE  Catholic  Encyclopedia. 

CFCB  Census  of  Fifteenth  Century  Books  Owned  in 
America,  compiled  by  a  committee  of  the  Bib- 
liographical Society  of  America,  New  York, 
1919. 

CLM  Codex  Latinus  Monacensis  (Latin  MS  at  Mu- 

nich). 


xfv  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

CSEL  Corpus   scriptorum   ecclesiasticorum  latinorum, 

Vienna,  i866~, 
CU  Cambridge  University  (used  to  distinguish  MSS 

in  colleges  having  the  same  names  as  those  at 

Oxford). 
CUL  Cambridge  University  Library. 

DNB  Dictionary  of  National  Biography. 

EB  Encyclopedia  Britannica,  nth  edition. 

EETS         Early  English  Text  Society  Publications. 
EHR  English  Historical  Review. 

ERE  Encyclopedia   of   Religion   and   Ethics,   ed.   J. 

Hastings  et  al.,  1908-. 
HL  Histoire  Litteraire  de  la  France. 

HZ  Historische  Zeitschrift,  Munich,  1859-. 

Kiihn  Medici  Graeci,  ed.  C.  J.  Kiihn,  Leipzig,   1829, 

containing  the  v^orks  of  Galen,  Dioscorides, 

etc. 
MG  Monumenta  Germaniae. 

MS  Manuscript. 

MSS  Manuscripts. 

Muratori     Rerum  Italicarum  scriptores  ab  anno  aerae  chris- 

tianae  500  ad  1500,  ed.  L.  A.  Muratori,  1723- 

1751. 
NH  C.   Plinii   Secundi  Naturalis  Historia    (Pliny's 

Natural  History). 
PG  Migne,    Patrologiae    cursus    completus,    series 

graeca. 
PL  Migne,    Patrologiae    cursus    completus,    series 

latina. 
PN  The  Nicene  and  Post-Nicene  Fathers,   Second 

Series,  ed.  Wace  and  Schaff,   1890-1900,   14 

vols. 
PW  Pauly  and  Wissowa,  Realencyclopadie  der  class- 

ischen  Altertumswissenschaft. 
RS  "Rolls  Series,"  or  Rerum  Britannicarum  medii 

aevi  scriptores,  99  works  in  244  vols.,  Lon- 
don, 1 858- 1 896. 


ABBREVIATIONS  xv 

TU  Texte  und  Untersuchungen  zur  Geschichte  der 

altchristlichen    Literatur,    ed.    Gebhardt   und 
Hamack. 

DESIGNATION   OF   MANUSCRIPTS 

Individual  manuscripts  are  usually  briefly  designated  in 
the  ensuing  notes  and  appendices  by  a  single  word  indicating 
the  place  or  collection  where  the  MS  is  found  and  the  num- 
ber or  shelf-mark  of  the  individual  MS.  So  many  of  the 
catalogues  of  MSS  collections  which  I  consulted  were  un- 
dated and  without  name  of  author  that  I  have  decided  to 
attempt  no  catalogue  of  them.  The  brief  designations  that 
I  give  will  be  sufficient  for  anyone  who  is  interested  in  MSS. 
In  giving  Latin  titles,  Incipifs,  and  the  like  of  MSS  I  employ 
quotation  marks  when  I  know  from  personal  examination 
or  otherwise  that  the  wording  is  that  of  the  MS  itself,  and 
omit  the  marks  where  the  Latin  seems  rather  to  be  that  of 
the  description  in  the  manuscript  catalogue  or  other  source  of 
information.  In  the  following  List  of  Works  Frequently 
Cited  are  included  a  few  MSS  catalogues  whose  authors  I 
shall  have  occasion  to  refer  to  by  name. 


LIST    OF    WORKS     FREQUENTLY     CITED     BY 

AUTHOR  AND  DATE  OF  PUBLICATION 

OR  BRIEF  TITLE 

For  more  detailed  bibliography  on  specific  topics  and  for 
editions  or  manuscripts  of  the  texts  used  see  the  bibliogra- 
phies, references,  and  appendices  to  individual  chapters.  I 
also  include  here  some  works  of  general  interest  or  of  rather 
cursory  character  which  I  have  not  had  occasion  to  mention 
elsewhere;  and  I  usually  add,  for  purposes  of  differentia- 
tion, other  works  in  our  field  by  an  author  than  those  works 
by  him  which  are  frequently  cited.  Of  the  many  histories  of 
the  sciences,  medicine,  and  magic  that  have  appeared  since 
the  invention  of  printing  I  have  included  but  a  small  selec- 
tion. Almost  without  exception  they  have  to  be  used  with 
the  greatest  caution. 
Abano,  Peter  of.  Conciliator  differentiarum  philosophorum 

et  praecipue  medicorum,  1472,  1476,  1521,  1526,  etc. 

De  venenis,  1472,  1476,  1484,  1490,  1515,  1521,  etc. 
Abel,  ed.  Orphica,  1885. 

Abelard,  Peter.    Opera  hactenus  seorsim  edita,  ed.  V.  Cou- 
sin, Paris,  1849-1859,  2  vols. 

Ouvrages  inedits,  ed.  V.  Cousin,  1835. 
Abt,  Die  Apologie  des  Apuleius  von  Madaura  und  die  an- 

tike  Zauberei,  Giessen,  1908. 
Achmetis  Oneirocriticon,  ed.  Rigaltius,  Paris,  1603. 
Adelard  of  Bath,  Ouaestiones  naturales,  1480,  1485,  etc. 

De  eodem  et  diverso,  ed.  H.  Willner,  Miinster,  1903. 
Ahrens,  K.    Das  Buch  der  Naturgegenstande,  1892. 

Zur  Geschichte  des  sogenannten  Physiologus,  1885. 
Ailly,  Pierre  d',  Tractatus  de  ymagine  mundi   (and  other 

works),  1480  (?). 
Albertus  Magnus,  Opera  omnia,  ed.  A.  Borgnet,  Paris,  1890- 

1899,  38  vols. 


xviii         MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Allbutt,  Sir  T.  Clifford.  The  Historical  Relations  of  Medi- 
cine and  Surgery  to  the  End  of  the  Sixteenth  Century, 
London,  1905,  122  pp.;  an  address  delivered  at  the  St. 
Louis  Congress  in  1904. 

The  Rise  of  the  Experimental  Method  in  Oxford,  Lon- 
don, 1902,  53  pp.,  from  Journal  of  the  Oxford  Univer- 
sity Junior  Scientific  Club,  May,  1902,  being  the  ninth 
Robert  Boyle  Lecture. 

Science  and  Medieval  Thought,  London,  1901,  116 
brief  pages.  The  Harveian  Oration  delivered  before 
the  Royal  College  of  Physicians. 

Allendy,  R.  F.  L'Alchimie  et  la  Medecine;  fitude  sur  les 
theories  hermetiques  dans  I'histoire  de  la  medecine, 
Paris,  1 91 2,  155  pp. 

Anz,  W.  Zur  Frage  nach  dem  Ursprung  des  Gnostizismus, 
Leipzig,  1897. 

Aquinas,  Thomas.  Opera  omnia,  ed.  E.  Frette  et  P.  Mare, 
Paris,  1 87 1 -1880,  34  vols. 

Aristotle,  De  animalibus  historia,  ed.  Dittmeyer,  1907;  En- 
glish translations  by  R.  Creswell,  1848,  and  D'Arcy  W. 
Thompson,  Oxford,  1910. 

Pseudo-Aristotle.     Lapidarius,  Merszborg,  1473. 

Secretum  secretorum,  Latin  translation  from  the  Arabic 
by  Philip  of  Tripoli  in  many  editions;  and  see  Gaster. 

Arnald  of  Villanova,  Opera,  Lyons,  1532. 

Artemidori  Daldiani  et  Achmetis  Sereimi  F.  Oneirocritica ; 
Astrampsychi  et  Nicephori  versus  etiam  Oneirocritici ; 
Nicolai  Rigaltii  ad  Artemidorum  Notae,  Paris,  1603. 

Ashmole,  Elias,  Theatrum  chemicum  Britannicum,  1652. 

Astruc,  Jean.  Memoires  pour  servir  a  I'histoire  de  la  Fa- 
culte  de  Medecine  de  Montpellier,  Paris,  1767. 

Auri ferae  artis  quam  chemiam  vocant  antiquissimi  auctores, 
Basel,  1572. 

Barach  et  Wrobel,  Bibliotheca  Philosophorum  Mediae  Aeta- 
tis,  1876-1878,  2  vols. 

Bartholomew  of  England,  De  proprietatibus  rerum  Lingel- 
bach,  Heidelberg,  1488,  and  other  editions. 


WORKS  FREQUENTLY  CITED  xix 

Bauhin,   De  plantis   a   divis   sanctisve   nomen   habentibus, 

Basel,  1 59 1. 
Baur,  Ludwig,  ed.  Gundissalinus  De  divisione  philosophiae, 

Miinster,  1903. 

Die   Philosophischen   Werke   des   Robert   Grosseteste, 

Miinster,  19 12. 
Beazley,  C.  R.    The  Dawn  of  Modern  Geography,  London, 

1 897-1 906,  3  vols. 
Bernard,  E.    Catalog!  librorum  manuscriptorum  Angliae  et 

Hiberniae  in  unum  collecti  (The  old  catalogue  of  the 

Bodleian  MSS),  Tom.  I,  Pars  i,  Oxford,  1697. 
Berthelot,  P.  E.  M.     Archeologie  et  histoire  des  sciences 

avec  publication  nouvelle  du  papyrus  grec  chimique  de 

Leyde  et  impression  originale  du  Liber  de  septuaginta 

de  Geber,  Paris,  1906. 

Collection  des  anciens  alchimistes  grecs,  1887- 1888,  3 

vols. 

Introduction  a  I'etude  de  la  chimie  des  anciens  et  du 

moyen  age,  1889. 

La  chimie  au  moyen  age,  1893,  3  vols. 

Les  origines  de  I'alchimie,  1885. 

Sur  les  voyages  de  Galien  et  de  Zosime  dans  I'Archipel 

et  en  Asie,  et  sur  la  matiere  medicale  dans  I'antiquite, 

in  Journal  des  Savants,  1895,  PP-  382-7. 
Bezold,   F.   von,   Astrologische   Geschichtsconstruction   im 

Mittelalter,  in  Deutsche  Zeitschrift  fiir  Geschichtswiss- 

enschaft,  VIII  (1892)  29ff. 
Bibliotheca  Chemica.     See  Borel  and  Manget. 
Bjornbo,  A.  A.  und  Vogl,  S.    Alkindi,  Tideus,  und  Pseudo- 

Euklid;  drei  optische  Werke,  Leipzig,  191 1. 
Black,  W.  H.     Catalogue  of  the  Ashmolean  Manuscripts, 

Oxford,  1845. 
Boffito,  P.  G.    II  Commento  di  Cecco  d'Ascoli  all'  Alcabizzo, 

Florence,  1905. 

II  De  principiis  astrologiae  di  Cecco  d'Ascoli,  in  Gior- 

nale  Storico  della  Letteratura  Italiana,  Suppl.  6,  Turin, 

1903. 


XX  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Perche  fu  condannato  al  fuoco  I'astrologo  Cecco  d'As- 

coli,  in  Studi  e  Documenti  di  Storia  e  Diritto,  Publi- 

cazione  periodica  dell'  accademia  de  conferenza  Storico- 

Giuridiche,  Rome,  XX  (1899). 
Boll,  Franz.     Die  Erforschung  der  antiken  Astrologie,  in 

Neue  Jahrb.  f.  d.  klass.  Altert.,  XI  (1908)   103-26. 

Eine  arabisch-byzantische  Quelle  des  Dialogs  Hermip- 

pus,  in  Sitzb.  Heidelberg  Akad.,  Philos.  Hist.  Classe 

(1912)  No.  18,  28  pp. 

Sphaera,  Leipzig,  1903. 

Studien  iiber  Claudius  Ptolemaeus,  in  Jahrb.  f.  klass. 

Philol.,  Suppl.  Bd.  XXI. 

Zur  Ueberlieferungsgeschichte  d.  griech.  Astrologie  u. 

Astronomie,  in  Miinch.  Akad.  Sitzb.,  1899. 
Boll  und  Bezold,  Stemglauben,  Leipzig,  19 18;  I  have  not 

seen. 
Bonatti,  Guido.     Liber  astronomicus,  Ratdolt,  Augsburg, 

1491. 
Boncompagni,  B.     Delia  vita  e  delle  Opere  di  Gherardo 
Cremonese  traduttore  del  secolo  duodecimo  e  di  Ghe- 
rardo da  Sabbionetta  astronomo  del  secolo  decimoterzo, 
Rome,  1 85 1. 

Delia  vita  e  delle  opere  di  Guido  Bonatti  astrologo 
ed  astronomo  del  secolo  decimoterzo,  Rome,  1851. 
Estratte  dal  Giornale  Arcadico,  Tomo  CXXIII- 
CXXIV.  Delia  vita  e  delle  opere  di  Leonardo  Pisano, 
Rome,  1852. 
Intorno  ad  alcune  opere  di  Leonardo  Pisano,  Rome, 

1854. 
Borel,  P.     Bibliotheca  Chimica  seu  catalogus  librorum  phi- 

losophicorum    hermeticorum    usque   ad    annum    1653, 

Paris,  1654. 
Bostock,  J.  and  Riley,   H.  T.     The  Natural  History  of 

Pliny,  translated  with  copious  notes,  London,    1855 ; 

reprinted  1887. 
Bouche-Leclercq,  A.    L'astrologie  dans  le  monde  romain,  in 

Revue  Historique,  vol.  65  (1897)  241-99. 


WORKS  FREQUENTLY  CITED  xxi 

L'astrologie  grecque,  Paris,  1899,  658  pp. 

Histoire  de  la  divination  dans  I'antiquite,   1879- 1882, 

4  vols. 
Breasted,  J.  H.     Development  of  Religion  and  Thought  in 

Ancient  Egypt,  New  York,  191 2. 

A  History  of  Egypt,  1905;  second  ed.,  1909. 
Brehaut,  E.    An  Encyclopedist  of  the  Dark  Ages;  Isidore  of 

Seville,  in  Columbia  University  Studies  in  History,  etc., 

vol.  48  (1912)  1-274. 
Brewer,  J.  S.     Monumenta  Franciscana  (RS  IV,  i),  Lon- 
don, 1858. 
Brown,  J.  Wood.     An  inquiry  into  the  life  and  legend  of 

Michael  Scot,  Edinburgh,  1897. 
Browne,  Edward  G.     Arabian  Medicine   (the  Fitzpatrick 

Lectures  of   1919  and   1920),   Cambridge  University 

Press,  1 92 1. 
Browne,  Sir  Thomas.     Pseudodoxia  Epidemica,  1650. 
Bubnov,  N.    ed.  Gerberti  opera  mathematica,  Berlin,  1899. 
Budge,  E.  A.  W.    Egyptian  Magic,  London,  1899. 

Ethiopic  Histories  of  Alexander  by  the  Pseudo-Callis- 

thenes  and  other  writers,  Cambridge  University  Press, 

1896. 

Syriac   Version   of    Pseudo-Callisthenes,    Cambridge, 

1889. 

Syrian  Anatomy,  Pathology,  and  Therapeutics,  Lon- 
don, 1 91 3,  2  vols. 
Bunbury,  E.  H.    A  History  of  Ancient  Geography,  London, 

1879,  2  vols. 
Cahier  et  Martin,  Melanges  d'archeologie,  d'histoire  et  de 

litterature,  Paris,  1847-1856,  4  folio  vols. 
Cajori,  F.    History  of  Mathematics;  second  edition,  revised 

and  enlarged,  191 9. 
Cantor,  M.     Vorlesungen  iiber  Geschichte  der  Mathematik, 

3rd  edition,  Leipzig,  1 899-1 908,  4  vols.    Reprint  of  vol. 

II  in  1913. 
Carini,  S.  I.    Sulle  Scienze  Occulte  nel  Medio  Evo,  Palermo, 

1872 ;  I  have  not  seen. 


xxii  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Cauzons,  Th.  de.    La  magie  et  la  sorcellerie  en  France,  1910, 
4  vols. ;  largely  compiled  from  secondary  sources. 

Charles,  E.     Roger  Bacon:  sa  vie,  ses  ouvrages,  ses  doc- 
trines, Bordeaux,  1861. 

Charles,  R.  H.  The  Apocrypha  and  Pseudepigrapha  of  the 
Old  Testament,  English  translation  with  introductions 
and  critical  and  explanatory  notes  in  conjunction  with 
many  scholars,  Oxford,  191 3,  2  large  vols. 
Ascension  of  Isaiah,  1900,  and  reprinted  in  1917. 
The  Book  of  Enoch,  Oxford,  1893;  translated  anew, 
1912. 

Charles,  R.  H.  and  Morfill,  W.  R.    The  Book  of  the  Secrets 
of  Enoch,  Oxford,  1896. 

Charterius,  Renatus  ed.  Galeni  opera,  Paris,  1679,  13  vols. 

Chartularium  Universitatis  Parisiensis,  see  Denifle  et  Cha- 
telain. 

Chassang,  A.    Le  merveilleux  dans  I'antiquite,  1882 ;  I  have 
not  seen. 

Choulant,  Ludwig.  Albertus  Magnus  in  seiner  Bedeutung 
fiir  die  Naturwissenschaften  historisch  und  bibliogra- 
phisch  dargestellt,  in  Janus,  I  (1846)  I52ff. 
Die  Anfange  wissenschaftlicher  Naturgeschichte  und 
naturhistorischer  Abbildung,  Dresden,  1856. 
Handbuch  der  Biicherkunde  fiir  die  altere  Medicin,  2nd 
edition,  Leipzig,  1841 ;  like  the  foregoing,  slighter  than 
the  title  leads  one  to  hope. 

ed.  Macer  Floridus  de  viribus  herbarum  una  cum  Wala- 
fridi  Strabonis,  Othonis  Cremonensis  et  loannis  Folcz 
carminibus  similis  argumenti,  1832. 

Christ,  W.    Geschichte  der  Griechischen  Litteratur;  see  W. 
Schmid. 

Chwolson,  D.     Die  Ssabier  und  der  Ssabismus,  Petrograd, 
1856,  2  vols. 

Clement-Mullet,  J.  J.    Essai  sur  la  mineralogie  arabe,  Paris, 
1868,  in  Journal  asiatique.  Tome  XI,  Serie  YI. 
Traite  des  poisons  de  Maimonide,  1865. 


WORKS  FREQUENTLY  CITED  xxiii 

Clerval,  Hermann  le  Dalmate,  Paris,  1891,  eleven  pp. 

Les  ecoles  de  Chartres  au  moyen  age,  Chartres,  1895. 

Cockayne,  O.     Leechdoms,  Wortcunning,  and  Starcraft  of 
Early  England,  in  RS  XXXV,  London,  1864-1866,  3 
vols. 
Narratiunculae  anglice  conscriptae,  1861. 

Congres  Periodique  International  des  Sciences  Medicales, 
17th  Session,  London,  Section  XXIII,  History  of  Medi- 
cine, 1913. 

Cousin,  V.     See  Abelard. 

Coxe,  H.  O.  Catalogi  Codicum  Manuscriptorum  Bibliothe- 
cae  Bodleianae  Pars  Secunda  Codices  Latinos  et  Mis- 
cellaneos  Laudianos  complectens,  Oxford,  1858-1885. 
Catalogi  Codicum  Manuscriptorum  Bibliothecae  Bodlei- 
anae Pars  Tertia  Codices  Graecos  et  Latinos  Canoni- 
cianos  complectens,  Oxford,  1854. 
Catalogus  Codicum  Manuscriptorum  qui  in  collegiis  au- 
lisque  Oxoniensibus  hodie  adservantur,  1852,  2  vols. 

Cumont,  F.  Astrology  and  Religion  among  the  Greeks  and 
Romans,  1912,  2  vols.  And  see  CCAG  under  Abbre- 
viations. 

Daremberg,  Ch.  V.  Exposition  des  connaissances  de  Galien 
sur  I'anatomie,  la  physiologic,  et  la  pathologic  du  sys- 
teme  nerveux,  Paris,  1841. 

Histoire  des  sciences  medicales,  Paris,  1870,  2  vols. 
La  medecine;  histoire  et  doctrines,  Paris,  1865. 
Notices  et  extraits  des  manuscrits  medicaux,  1853. 

Delambre,  J.  B.  J.  Histoire  de  I'astronomie  du  moyen  age, 
Paris,  1819. 

Delisle,  L.  Inventaire  des  manuscrits  latins  conserves  a  la 
bibhotheque  nationale  sous  les  numeros  8823- 186 13  et 
faisant  suite  a  la  serie  dont  la  catalogue  a  ete  public  en 
1744,  Paris,  1863-1871. 

Denifle,  H.  Quellen  zur  Gelehrtengeschichte  des  Prediger- 
ordens  im  13  und  14  Jahrhundert,  in  Archiv  f.  Lit.  u. 
Kirchengesch.  d.  Mittelalters,  Berlin,  II  (1886)  165- 
248. 


xxiv         MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Denifle  et  Chatelain,  Chartularium  Universitatis  Parisiensis, 
Paris,  1 889-1 891,  2  vols. 

Denis,  F.  Le  monde  enchante,  cosmographie  et  histoire 
naturelles  fantastiques  du  moyen  age,  Paris,  1843.  A 
curious  little  volume  with  a  bibliography  of  works  now 
forgotten, 

Doutte,  E.  Magie  et  religion  dans  I'Afrique  du  Nord,  Al- 
ger, 1909. 

Duhem,  Pierre.  Le  Systeme  du  Monde :  Histoire  des  Doc- 
trines Cosmologiques  de  Platon  a  Copernic,  5  vols., 
Paris,  1913-1917. 

Du  Prel,  C.  Die  Magie  als  Naturwissenschaft,  1899,  2 
vols.  Occult  speculation,  not  historical  treatment;  the 
author  seems  to  have  no  direct  acquaintance  with 
sources  earlier  than  Agrippa  in  the  sixteenth  century. 

Easter,  D.  B.  A  Study  of  the  Magic  Elements  in  the  romans 
d'aventure  and  the  romans  bretons,  Johns  Hopkins, 
1906. 

Ennemoser,  J.     History  of  Magic,  London,  1854. 

Enoch,  Book  of.     See  Charles. 

Epiphanius.  Opera  ed.  G.  Dindorf,  Leipzig,  1859-1862, 
5  vols. 

Evans,  H.  R.    The  Old  and  New  Magic,  Chicago,  1906. 

Fabricius,  Bibliotheca  Graeca,  171 1. 

Bibliotheca  Latina  Mediae  et  Infimae  Aetatis,   1734- 

1746,  6  vols. 

Codex  Pseudepigraphus  Veteris  Testament!,  1713-1733- 

Farnell,  L.  R.  Greece  and  Babylon ;  a  comparative  sketch  of 
Mesopotamian,  Anatolian,  and  Hellenic  Religions, 
Edinburgh,  191 1. 

The  Higher  Aspects  of  Greek  Religion,  New  York, 
1912. 

Ferckel,  C.  Die  Gynakologie  des  Thomas  von  Brabants. 
ausgewahlte  Kapitel  aus  Buch  I  de  naturis  rerum  been- 
det  um  1240,  Munich,  1912,  in  G.  Klein,  Alte  Meister 
d.  Medizin  u.  Naturkunde. 

Ferguson,  John,     Bibliotheca  Chemica,  a  catalogue  of  al- 


WORKS  FREQUENTLY  CITED  xxv 

chemical,  chemical  and  pharmaceutical  books  in  the  col- 
lection of  the  late  James  Young,  Glasgow,  1906. 

Fort,  G.  F.  Medical  Economy;  a  contribution  to  the  his- 
tory of  European  morals  from  the  Roman  Empire  to 
1400,  New  York,  1883. 

Fossi,  F.  Catalogus  codicum  saeculo  XV  impressorum  qui 
in  publica  Bibliotheca  Magliabechiana  Florentiae  ad- 
servantur,  1 793-1 795. 

Frazer,  Sir  J.  G.  Folk-Lore  in  the  Old  Testament,  3  vols., 
1918. 

Golden  Bough,  edition  of  1894,  2  vols. 
Magic  Art  and  the  Evolution  of  Kings,  2  vols.,  191 1. 
Some  Popular  Superstitions  of  the  Ancients,  in  Folk- 
Lore,  1890. 
Spirits  of  the  Corn  and  of  the  Wild,  2  vols.,  1912. 

Garinet.     Histoire  de  la  Magie  en  France. 

Garrison,  F.  H.  An  Introduction  to  the  History  of  Medi- 
cine, 2nd  edition,  Philadelphia,  1917. 

Gaster,  M.  A  Hebrew  Version  of  the  Secretum  secretorum, 
published  for  the  first  time,  in  Journal  of  the  Royal 
Asiatic  Society,  London,  1907,  pp.  879-913;  1908,  pp. 
111-62,  1065-84. 

Gerland,  E.  Geschichte  der  Physik  von  den  altesten  Zeiten 
bis  zum  Ausgange  des  achtzehnten  Jahrhunderts,  in 
Konigl.  Akad.  d.  Wiss.,  XXIV  (1913)  Munich  and 
Berlin. 

Gerland  und  Traumiiller,  Geschichte  der  Physikalischen  Ex- 
perimentierkunst,  Leipzig,  1899. 

Giacosa,  P.    Magistri  Salernitani  nondum  editi,  Turin,  1901. 

Gilbert  of  England,  Compendium  medicinae,  Lyons,  15 10. 

Gloria,  Andrea.     Monumenti  della  Universita  di  Padova, 
1222-13 18,  iri  Memorie  del  Reale  Istituto  Veneto  di 
Scienze,  Lettere  ed  Arti,  XXII  (1884). 
Monumenti   della   Universita   di   Padova,    1318-1405 
1888. 

Gordon,  Bernard.    Lilium  medicinae,  Venice,  1496,  etc. 
Practica  (and  other  treatises),   1521. 


xxvi         MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Grabmann,    Martin.      Forschungen    iiber    die   lateinischen 

Aristoteles-Uebersetzungen    des     XIII    Jahrhunderts, 

Miinster,  191 6. 

Die  Geschichte  der  Scholastischen  Methode,  Freiburg, 

1909-1911,  2  vols. 
Graesse,  J.  G.  T.    Bibliotheca  magica,  1843;  ^^  ^^ttle  serv- 
ice to  me. 
Grenfell,  B.  P.     The  Present  Position  of  Papyrology,  in 

Bulletin   of   John   Rylands   Library,    Manchester,   VI 

(1921)  142-62. 
Haeser,  H,     Lehrbuch  der  Geschichte  der  Medicin  und  der 

Volkskrankheiten,  Dritte  Bearbeitung,  1875-1882, 
Halle,  J.     Zur  Geschichte  der  Medizin  von  Hippokrates  bis 

zum  XVIII  Jahrhundert,  Munich,  1909,  199  pp.;  too 

brief,  but  suggests  interesting  topics. 
Halliwell,  J.  O.    Rara  Mathematica,  1839. 
Hammer- Jensen.     Das  sogennannte  IV  Buch  der  Meteoro- 

logie  des  Aristoteles,  in  Hermes,  L  (191 5)  113-36. 

Ptolemaios  und  Heron,  Ibid.,  XLVIII  (1913),  224ff. 
Hansen,  J.    Zauberwahn,  Inquisition,  und  Hexenprozess  im 

Mittelalter,  Munich  and  Leipzig,  1900. 
Haskins,  C.  H.    Adelard  of  Bath,  in  EHR  XXVI  (1911) 

491-8;  xxvm  (1913),  515-6. 

Leo  Tuscus,  in  EHR  XXXIII  (1918),  492-6. 

The  "De  Arte  Venandi  cum  Avibus"  of  the  Emperor 

Frederick  II,  EHR  XXXVI  (1921)  334-55. 

The  Reception  of  Arabic  Science  in  England,  EHR 

XXX  (1915),  56-69. 

The  Greek  Element  in  the  Renaissance  of  the  Twelfth 

Century,  in  American  Historical  Review,  XXV  (1920) 

603-15. 

The  Translations  of  Hugo  Sanctelliensis,  in  Romanic 

Review,  II  (1911)  1-15. 

Nimrod  the  Astronomer,  Ibid.,  V  (1914)  203-12. 

A  List  of  Text-books  from  the  Close  of  the  Twelfth 

Century,   in  Harvard  Studies  in  Classical  Philology, 

XX  (1909)  75-94. 


WORKS  FREQUENTLY  CITED  xxvii 

Haskins  and  Lockwood.  The  Sicilian  Translators  of  the 
Twelfth  Century  and  the  First  Latin  Versions  of  Ptol- 
emy's Almagest,  Ibid.,  XXI  (1910),  75-102. 

Haureau,  B.  Bernard  Delicieux  et  i'inquisition  albigeoise, 
Paris,  1887. 

Histoire  de  la  philosophie  scolastique,  1872- 1880. 
Le  Mathematicus  de  Bernard  Silvestris,  Paris,  1895. 
Les  oeuvres  de  Hugues  de  Saint  Victor,  essai  critique, 
nouvelle  edition,  Paris,  1886. 
Melanges  poetiques  d'Hildebert  de  Lavardin. 
Notices  et  extraits  de  quelques  mss  latins  de  la  biblio- 
theque  nationale,  1890- 1893,  6  vols. 
Singularites  historiques  et  litteraires,  Paris,  1861. 

Heamshaw,  F.  J.  C.  Medieval  Contributions  to  Modern 
Civilization,  1921. 

Heilbronner,  J.  C.  Historia  Matheseos  universae  praecipu- 
orum  mathematicorum  vitas  dogmata  scripta  et  manu- 
scripta  complexa,  Leipzig,  1742. 

Heim,  R.     De  rebus  magicis  Marcelli  medici,  in  Schedae 
philol.  Hermanno  Usener  oblatae,  1891,  pp.  119-37. 
Incantamenta  magica  graeca  latina,  in  Jahrb.  f .  cl.  Phi- 
lol., 19  suppl.  bd.,  Leipzig,  1893,  pp.  463-576. 

Heller,  A.  Geschichte  der  Physik  von  Aristoteles  bis  auf  die 
neueste  Zeit,  Stuttgart,  1882-1884,  2  vols. 

Hendrie,  R.  Theophili  Libri  III  de  diversis  artibus,  trans- 
lated by,  London,  1847. 

Hengstenberg,  E.  W.  Die  Geschichte  Bileams  und  seine 
Weissagungen,  Berlin,  1842. 

Henry,  V.    La  magie  dans  ITnde  antique,  1904. 

Henslow,  G.  Medical  Works  of  the  Fourteenth  Century, 
London,  1899. 

Hercher,  ed.  Aeliani  opera,  1864. 

ed.  Artemidori  Oneirocritica,  Leipzig,  1864. 

ed.  Astrampsychi  oculorum  decades,  Berlin,  1863. 

Hertling,  G.  von,  Albertus  Magnus;  Beitrage  zu  seiner 
Wiirdigung,  revised  edition  with  help  of  Baeumker  and 
Endres,  Miinster,  191 4. 


xxviii       MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Hubert,  H.     Magia,  in  Daremberg-Saglio. 

Hubert  et  Mauss,  Esquisse  d'une  Theorie  Generale  de  la 
Magie,  in  Annee  Sociologique,  1902-1903,  pp.  1-146. 

Husik,  I.     A  History  of  Medieval  Jewish  Philosophy,  1916. 

Ishak  ibn  Sulaiman,  Opera,  15 15. 

James,  M.  R.    A  Descriptive  Catalogue  of  the  McClean  Col- 
lection of  MSS  in  the  Fitzwilliam  Museum,  1912. 
A  Descriptive  Catalogue  of  the  MSS  in  the  Fitzwilliam 
Museum,  1895. 

A  Descriptive  Catalogue  of  the  MSS  in  the  Library  of 
Corpus  Christi  College,  Cambridge,  19 12,  2  vols, 
A  Descriptive  Catalogue  of  the  MSS  in  the  Library  of 
Gonville  and  Caius  College,  1907- 1908,  2  vols. 
A  Descriptive  Catalogue  of  the  MSS  in  the  Library  of 
Pembroke  College,  1905. 

A  Descriptive  Catalogue  of  the  MSS  in  the  Library 
of  Peterhouse,  1899. 

A  Descriptive  Catalogue  of  the  MSS  in  the  Library  of 
St.  John's  College,  Cambridge,  191 3. 
A  Descriptive  Catalogue  of  the  MSS  in  the  Library  of 
Sidney  Sussex  College,  Cambridge,  1895. 
The  Ancient  Libraries  of  Canterbury  and  Dover,  1903. 
The  Western  MSS  in  the  Library  of  Emmanuel  Col- 
lege, 1904. 

The  Western  MSS  in  the  Library  of  Trinity  College, 
Cambridge,  1900- 1904,  4  vols. 

Janus,  Zeitschrift  fiir  Geschichte  und  Literatur  der  Medizin, 
1 846-. 

Jenaer  medizin-historische  Beitrage,   herausg.  von  T.   M. 
Steineg,  191 2-. 

Joel,  D.     Der  Aberglaube  und  die  Stellung  des  Judenthums 
zu  demselben,  1881. 

John  of  Salisbury,  Metalogicus,  in  Migne  PL  vol.  199. 

Polycraticus  sive  de  nugis  curialium  et  vestigiis  philo- 
sophorum,  Ibid,  and  also  ed.  C.  C.  L  Webb,  Oxford, 
1909. 


WORKS  FREQUENTLY  CITED  xxix 

Joret,  Les  plantes  dans  I'antiquite  et  au  moyen  age,  2  vols., 
Paris,  1897  and  1904. 

Jourdain,  A.  Recherches  critiques  sur  I'age  et  I'origine  des 
traductions  latines  d'Aristote,  Paris,  1819;  2nd  edi- 
tion, 1843. 

Jourdain,  C.     Dissertation  sur  I'etat  de  la  philosophic  natu- 
relle  en  Occident  et  principalement  en  France  pendant  la 
premiere  moitie  du  Xlle  siecle,  Paris,  1838. 
Excursions  historiques  et  philosophiques  a  travers  le 
moyen  age,  Paris,  1888. 

Karpinski,  L.  C,  Hindu  Science,  in  American  Mathematical 
Monthly,  XXVI  (1919)  pp.  298-300. 
Robert  of  Chester's  Latin  translation  of  the  Algebra  of 
al-Khowarizmi,  with  introduction,  critical  notes,  and 
an  English  version,  New  York,  191 5. 
The  "Quadripartitum  numerorum"  of  John  of  Meurs, 
in  BibHotheca  Mathematica,  III  Folge,  XIII  Bd.  (1913) 
99-114. 

Kaufmann,  A.    Thomas  von  Chantimpre,  Cologne,  1899. 

King,  C.  W.  The  Gnostics  and  their  Remains,  ancient  and 
medieval,  London,  1887. 

The  Natural  History,  ancient  and  modern,  of  Precious 
Stones  and  Gems,  London,  1855. 

Kopp,  H.  Beitrage  zur  Geschichte  der  Chemie,  Bruns- 
wick, 1869-1875. 

Ueber  den  Zustand  der  Naturwissenschaften  im  Mittel- 
alter,  1869. 

Kretschmer,  C.  Die  physische  Erdkunde  im  christlichen 
Mittelalter,  1889. 

Krumbacher,  K.  Geschichte  der  byzantinischen  Literatur, 
527-1453  A.  D.,  2nd  edition,  Munich,  1897. 

Kunz,  G.  F.    The  Curious  Lore  of  Precious  Stones,  Phila- 
delphia, 1 91 3. 
Magic  of  Jewels  and  Charms,  Philadelphia,  19 15. 

Langlois,  Ch.  V.  La  connaissance  de  la  nature  et  du  monde 
au  moyen  age  d'apres  quelques  ecrits  frangais  a  I'usage 
des  laics,  Paris,  191 1. 


XXX  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Maitre  Bernard,  in  Bibl.  de  I'ficole  des  Chartes,  LIV 
(1893)  225-50,  795. 

Lauchert,  F.    Geschichte  des  Physiologus,  Strassburg,  1889. 

Lea,  H.  C.  A  History  of  the  Inquisition  of  the  Middle 
Ages,  New  York,  1883,  3  vols. 

Le  Brun.  Histoire  critique  des  pratiques  superstitieuses, 
Amsterdam,  1733. 

Lecky,  W.  E.  H.     History  of  European  Morals  from  Au- 
gustus to  Charlemagne,  1870,  2  vols. 
History  of  the  Rise  and  Influence  of  the  Spirit  of  Ra- 
tionalism in  Europe,  revised  edition,  London,  1870. 

Lehmann,  A.  Aberglaube  und  Zauberei  von  den  altesten 
Zeiten  an  bis  in  die  Gegenwart;  deutsche  autorisierte 
Uebersetzung  von  I.  Petersen,  Stuttgart,  1908.  The 
historical  treatment  is  scanty. 

Leminne,  J.  Les  quatre  elements,  in  Memoires  couronnes 
par  I'Academie  Royale  de  Belgique,  vol.  65,  Brussels, 
1903. 

Levy,  L.  G.    Maimonide,  191 1. 

Liechty,  R.  de.  Albert  le  Grand  et  saint  Thomas  d'Aquin, 
ou  la  science  au  moyen  age,  Paris,  1880. 

Lippmann,  E.  O.  von.  Entstehung  und  Ausbreitung  der  Al- 
chemic, 1919. 

Little,  A.  G.  Initia  operum  Latinorum  quae  saeculis  XIII, 
XIV,  XV,  attribuuntur,  Manchester,  1904. 
ed.  Roger  Bacon  Essays,  contributed  by  various  writers 
on  the  occasion  of  the  commemoration  of  the  seventh 
centenary  of  his  birth,  Oxford,  1914. 
ed.  Part  of  the  Opus  Tertium  of  Roger  Bacon,  includ- 
ing a  Fragment  now  printed  for  the  first  time,  Aber- 
deen, 1912,  in  British  Society  of  Franciscan  Studies, 
IV. 

Loisy.  Magie,  science  et  religion,  in  A  propos  d'histoire 
des  religions,  191 1,  p.i66ff. 

Macdonald,  D.  B.  The  Religious  Attitude  and  Life  in 
Islam,  Chicago,  1909. 

Macray,  Catalogus  codicum  MSS  Bibliothecae  Bodleianae, 


WORKS  FREQUENTLY  CITED  xxxi 

V,  Codices  Rawlinsonianae,  1862-1900,  5  fascs. ;  IX, 

Codices  Digbeianae,  1883. 
Mai,  A.     Classici  Auctores,  1835. 
Male,  E.    Religious  Art  in  France  in  the  Thirteenth  Century, 

translated  from  the  third  edition  by  Dora  Nussey,  1913. 
Mandonnet,    P.      Des   ecrits   authentiques   de   S.   Thomas 

d'Aquin,  Fribourg,  1910. 

Roger  Bacon  et  la  composition  des  trois  Opus,  in  Revue 

Neo-Scolastique,  Louvain,  191 3,  pp.  52-68,  164-80. 

Roger  Bacon  et  la  Speculum  astronomiae,  Ibid.,  XVII 

(1910)  313-35. 

Siger  de  Brabant  et  I'averroisme  latin  au  Xlllme  siecle, 

Fribourg,   1899;  2nd  edition,  Louvain,   1908-1910,  2 

vols. 
Manget,  J.  J.     Bibliotheca  Chemica  Curiosa,  Geneva,  1702, 

2  vols. 
Manitius,  Max.     Geschichte  der  lateinischen  Literatur  des 

Mittelalters,  Erster  Teil,  Von  Justinian  bis  zur  Mitte 

des  zehnten  Jahrhunderts,  Munich,  191 1,  in  Miiller's 

Handbuch  d.  kl.  Alt.  Wiss.  IX,  2,  i. 
Mann,  M.  F.     Der  Bestiaire  Divin  des  Guillaume  le  Clerc, 

1888. 

Der   Physiologus   des   Philipp  von  Thaon   und   seine 

Quellen,  1884. 
Mappae  clavicula,  ed.  M.  A.  Way  in  Archaeologia,  London, 

XXXII  (1847)  183-244. 
Maury,  Alfred.    La  magie  et  I'astrologie  dans  Tantiquite  et 

au  moyen  age,  1877,     Brief  as  it  is,  perhaps  the  best 

general  history  of  magic. 
Mead,  G.  R.  S.     Apollonius  of  Tyana;  a  critical  study  of 

the  only  existing  record  of  his  life,  1901. 

Echoes  from  the  Gnosis,  1906,  eleven  vols. 

Fragments  of  a  Faith  Forgotten,  1900. 

Pistis-Sophia,  now  for  the  first  time  Englished,  1896. 

Plotinus,  Select  Works  of,  with  preface  and  bibliog- 
raphy, 1909. 

Simon  Magus,  1892. 


xxxii        MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Thrice  Great  Hermes,  London,  1906,  3  vols. 
Medicae  artis  principes  post  Hippocratem  et  Galenurn  Graeci 

Latinitate  donati,  ed.  Stephanus,  1567. 
Medici  antiqui  omnes  qui  latinis  litteris  .  .  .  Aldus,  Venice, 

1547- 

Mely,  F.  de  et  Ruelle,  C.  E.  Les  lapidaires  de  Tantiquite 
et  du  moyen  age,  Paris,  1896.  Mely  has  published 
many  other  works  on  gems  and  lapidaries  of  the  past. 

Merrifield,  Mrs.  M.  P.  Ancient  Practice  of  Painting,  or 
Original  Treatises  dating  from  the  Xllth  to  XVIIIth 
centuries  on  the  arts  of  painting,  London,  1849. 

Meyer,  E.  Albertus  Magnus,  ein  Beitrag  zur  Geschichte  der 
Botanik  im  XIII  Jahrhundert,  in  Linnaea,  X  (1836) 
641-741,  XI  (1837)  545. 

Meyer,  Karl.  Der  Aberglaube  des  Mittelalters  und  der 
nachstfolgenden  Jahrhunderte,  Basel,  1856. 

Migne,  Dictionnaire  des  Apocryphes,  Paris,  1856. 
See  also  under  Abbreviations. 

Millot-Carpentier,  La  Medecine  au  XI He  siecle,  in  Annales 
Internationales  d'Histoire,  Congres  de  Paris,  1900,  5e 
Section,  Histoire  des  Sciences,  pp.  171-96;  a  chapter 
from  a  history  of  medicine  which  the  author's  death 
unfortunately  kept  him  from  completing. 

Milward,  E.  A  Letter  to  the  Honourable  Sir  Hans  Sloane, 
Bart.,  in  vindication  of  the  character  of  those  Greek 
writers  in  physick  that  flourished  after  Galen.  .  .  partic- 
ularly that  of  Alexander  Trallian,  1733;  reprinted  as 
Trallianus  Reviviscens,  1734. 

Mommsen,  Th.  ed.  C.  lulii  Solini  Collectanea  rerum  memo- 
rabilium,  1895. 

Moore,  Sir  Norman,  History  of  the  Study  of  Medicine  in 
the  British  Isles,  1908. 

The  History  of  St.  Bartholomew's  Hospital,  London, 
1 918,  2  vols. 

The  Physician  in  EngHsh  History,  191 3.     A  popular 
lecture. 

Muratori,  L.  A.     Antiquitates  Italicae  medii  aevi,  Milan, 


WORKS  FREQUENTLY  CITED  xxxiii 

1738-1742,  6  vols.    Edition  of  1778  in  more  vols.    In- 
dex, Turin,  1885. 
See  also  under  Abbreviations. 

Naude,  Gabriel.  Apologie  pour  tous  les  grands  personnages 
qui  ont  este  faussement  soupQonnez  de  Magie,  Paris, 
1625. 

Neckam,  Alexander.  De  naturis  rerum,  ed.  T.  Wright,  in 
RS  vol.  34,  1863. 

Omont,  H.  Nouvelles  acquisitions  du  department  des  manu- 
scrits  pendant  les  annees  1891-1910,  Bibliotheque  Na- 
tionale,  Paris. 

Orr,  M.  A.  (Mrs.  John  Evershed)  Dante  and  the  Early  As- 
tronomers, London,  1913. 

Paetow,  L.  J.  Guide  to  the  Study  of  Medieval  History, 
University  of  California  Press,  191 7. 

Pagel,  J.  L.  Die  Concordanciae  des  Joannes  de  Sancto 
Amando,  1894. 

Geschichte  der  Medizin  im  Mittelalter,  in  Puschmann's 
Handbuch  der  Geschichte  der  Medizin,  ed.  Neuburger 
u.  Pagel,  I  (1902)  622-yc^2. 

Neue  litterarische  Beitrage  zur  mittelalterlichen  Medi- 
cin,  Berlin,  1896. 

Pangerl,  A.  Studien  iiber  Albert  den  Grossen,  in  Zeitschrift 
fiir  katholische  Theologie,  XXII  (1912)  304-46,  512- 
49,  784-800. 

Pannier,  L.  Les  lapidaires  frangais  du  moyen  age,  Paris, 
1882. 

Payne,  J.  F.  English  Medicine  in  Anglo-Saxon  Times, 
1904. 

The  Relation  of  Harvey  to  his  Predecessors  and  espe- 
cially to  Galen :  Harveian  oration  of  1896,  in  The  Lan- 
cet, Oct.  24,  1896,  ii36ff. 

Perna.  Artis  quam  chemiam  vocant  antiquissimi  auctores, 
Basel,  1572. 

Perrier,  T.  La  medecine  astrologique,  Lyons,  1905,  88  pp. 
Slight. 

Petrus  de  Prussia.    Vita  B.  Alberti  Magni,  1621. 


xxxiv       MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Petrus  Hispanus.  Summa  experimentorum  sive  thesaurus 
pauperum,  Antwerp,  1497. 

Philips,  H.     Medicine  and  Astrology,  1867. 

Picavet,  F.  Esquisse  d'une  histoire  comparee  des  philoso- 
phies medievales,  2nd  edition,  Paris,  1907. 

Pico  della  Mirandola.     Opera  omnia,  15 19. 

Pistis-Sophia,  ed.  Schwartze  und  Petermann,  Coptic  and 
Latin,  185 1.  Now  for  the  first  time  Englished,  by  G. 
R.  S.  Mead,  1896. 

Pitra,  J.  B.    Analecta  novissima,  1885- 1888. 
Analecta  sacra,  1876- 1882. 
Spicilegium  solesmense,  1852-1858. 

Poisson,  Theories  et  symboles  des  Alchimistes,  Paris,  189 1. 

Poole,  R.  L.  Illustrations  of  the  History  of  Medieval 
Thought  in  the  Departments  of  Theology  and  Ecclesi- 
astical Politics,  1884;  revised  edition,  1920. 
The  Masters  of  the  Schools  at  Paris  and  Chartres  in 
John  of  Salisbury's  Time,  in  EHR  XXXV  (1920) 
321-42. 

Pouchet,  F.  A.  Histoire  des  sciences  naturelles  au  moyen 
age,  ou  Albert  le  Grand  et  son  epoque  considere  comme 
point  de  depart  de  I'ecole  experimentale,  Paris,  1853. 

Ptolemy.     Quadripartitum,   1484,  and  other  editions. 
Optica,  ed.  G.  Govi,  Turin,  1885. 

Puccinotti,  F.     Storia  della  Medicina,  1850-1870,  3  vols. 

Puschmann,  Th.  Alexander  von  Tralles,  Originaltext  und 
Uebersetzung  nebst  einer  einleitenden  Abhandlung,  Vi- 
enna, 1 878- 1 879. 

Handbuch  der  Geschichte  der  Medizin,  Jena,  1902- 
1905,  3  vols.  Really  a  cooperative  work  under  the  edi- 
torship of  Max  Neuburger  and  Julius  Pagel  after 
Puschmann's  death. 

A  History  of  Medical  Education  from  the  most  remote 
to  the  most  recent  times,  London,  1891,  English  trans- 
lation. 

Quetif,  J.  et  Echard  J.  Scriptores  Ordinis  Praedicatorum, 
Paris,  1719. 


WORKS  FREQUENTLY  CITED  xxxv 

Rambosson,  A.     Histoire  et  legendes  des  plantes,  Paris, 
1887. 

Rashdall,  H.    ed.  Fratris  Rogeri  Bacon  Compendium  Studii 
Tiieologiae,  191 1. 

The  Universities  of  Europe  in  the  Middle  Ages,  Ox- 
ford, 1895,  3  vols,  in  2. 

Rasis  (Muhammad  ibn  Zakariya)  Opera,  Milan,  1481,  and 
Bergamo,  1497. 

Regnault,  J.     La  sorcellerie:  ses  rapports  avec  les  sciences 
biologiques,  1897,  345  pp. 

Reitzenstein,  R.     Poimandres,  Leipzig,  1904. 

Renzi,  S.  de.    Collectio  Salernitana,  1 852-1 859,  5  vols. 

Rose,  Valentin.     Anecdota  graeca  et  graeco-latina,  Berlin, 
1864. 

Aristoteles  De  lapidibus  und  Arnoldus  Saxo,  in  Zeit- 
schrift  fiir  deutsches  Alterthum,  XVIII  (1875)  321- 

447- 

Ptolemaeus  und  die  Schule  von  Toledo,  in  Hermes, 

VIII  (1874)  327-49- 

ed.  Plinii  Secundi  lunioris  de  medicina  libri  tres,  Leip- 
zig, 1875. 

Ueber  die  Medicina  Plinii,  in  Hermes,  VIII   (1874) 
19-66. 

Verzeichnis  der  lateinischen  Handschriften  der  K,  Bib- 
liothek  zu  Berlin,  Band  XII  (1893),  XIII  (1902-1903- 

1905). 

Ruska,  J.    Das  Steinbuch  des  Aristoteles  .  .  .  nach  der  ara- 
bischen  Handschrift,  Heidelberg,  1912. 
Der  diamant  in  der  Medizin,  in  Deutsche  Gesell,   f. 
Gesch.  d.  Mediz.  u.  d.  Naturwiss.,  Zwanzig  Abhandl.  z. 
Gesch.  d.  Mediz.,  1908. 

Zur  alteren  arabischen  Algebra  und  Rechenkunst,  Heid- 
elberg, 19 1 7. 

Rydberg,  V.    The  Magic  of  the  Middle  Ages,  1879,  trans- 
lated from  the  Swedish.    Popular. 

Salverte,  E.     Des  sciences  occultes,  ou  essai  sur  la  magie, 
Paris,  1843. 


xxxvi       MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Sanchez  Perez,  J.  A.  Biografias  de  Matematicos  Arabes  que 
florecieron  en  Espafia,  Madrid,  1921. 

Schanz,  M.  Geschichte  der  Romischen  Litteratur,  Dritter 
Teil,  Munich,  1905  ;  Vierter  Teil,  Erste  Halfte,  Munich, 
1914,  in  Miiller's  Handbuch  d.  klass.  Alt.  Wiss.,  VIII, 

3- 

Schepss,  G.    ed.  PriscilHani  quae  supersunt,  1889. 

Schindler.     Der  Aberglaube  des  Mittelahers,  Breslau,  1858. 

Schmid,  W.  Die  Nachklassiche  Periode  der  Griechischen 
Litteratur,  1913,  in  Miiller's  Handb.  d.  kl.  Alt.  Wiss., 
VII,  ii,  2. 

Schum,  W.  Beschriebendes  Verzeichnis  der  Amplonian- 
ischen  Handschriften-Sammlung  zu  Erfurt,  Berlin, 
1887. 

Sighart,  J.  Albertus  Magnus :  sein  Leben  und  seine  Wissen- 
schaft,  Ratisbon,  1857;  French  translation,  Paris, 
1862;  partial  English  translation  by  T.  A.  Dixon,  Lon- 
don, 1876. 

Singer,  Charles.    Early  English  Magic  and  Medicine,  1920, 

34  pp. 

"Science,"  pp.   106-48  in  "Medieval  Contributions  to 

Modern  Civilization,"  ed.  F.  J.  C.  Hearnshaw,  1921. 

Studies  in  the  History  and  Method  of  Science,  Oxford, 

19 17;  a  second  volume  appeared  in  May,  1921. 
Stapper,  Richard.    Papst  Johannes  XXI,  Mtinster,  1898,  in 

Kirchengesch.  Studien  herausg.  v.  Dr.  Knopfler,  IV,  4. 
Steele,  R.     Opera  hactenus  inedita  Rogeri  Baconi,   1905- 

1920. 
Steinschneider,  Moritz.     Abraham  ibn  Ezra,  in  Abhandl., 

(1880)  57-128. 

Apollonius  von  Thyana  (oder  Balinas)  bei  den  Arabern, 

in  Zeitschrift  d.   deutschen  morgenlandischen   Gesell- 

schaft,  XLV   (1891)  439-46. 

Arabische  Lapidarien,  Ibid.,  XLIX  (1895). 

Constantinus  Africanus  und  seine  arabischen  Quellen, 

in  Virchow's  Archiv  fiir  pathologische  Anatomic,  etc., 

Berlin,  XXXVII  (1866)  351-410. 


WORKS  FREQUENTLY  CITED  xxxvii 

Der  Aberglaube,  Hamburg,  1900,  34  pp. 

Die  europaischen  Uebersetzungen  aus  dem  Arabischen 

bis  Mitte  des  17  Jahrhunderts,  in  Sitzungsberichte  d. 

kaiserl.  Akad.  d.  Wiss.,  Philos.  Hist.  Klasse,  Vienna, 

CXLIX,  4  (1905)  ;  CLI,  I  (1906). 

Lapidarien,     ein     culturgeschichtlicher     Versuch,     in 

Semitic   Studies   in  memory  of   Rev.   Dr.   Alexander 

Kohut,  Berlin,  1897,  pp.  42-72. 

Maschallah,  in  Zeitsch.  d.  deut.  morgenl.  GeselL,  LIH 

(1899),  434-40. 

Zum   Speculum   astronomicum   des  Albertus   Magnus 

liber  die  darin  angefiihrten  Schriftsteller  und  Schriften, 

in  Zeitschrift   fiir  Mathematik   und  Physik,   Leipzig, 

XVI  (1871)357-96.^ 

Zur  alchimistischen  Literatur  der  Araber,  in  Zeitsch,  d. 
deut.  morgenl.  Gesell.,  LVIH  (1904)  299-315. 
Zur  pseudepigraphischen  Literatur  insbesondere  der  ge- 
heimen  Wissenschaften  des  Mittelalters;  aus  hebrai- 
schen  und  arabischen  Quellen,  Berlin,  1862. 

Stephanus,  H.  Medicae  artis  principes  post  Hippocratem  et 
Galenum  Graeci  Latinitate  donati,  et  Latini,  1567. 

Strunz,  Franz.  Geschichte  der  Naturwissenschaften  im  Mit- 
telalter,  Stuttgart,  1910,  120  pp.  Without  index  or  ref- 
erences. 

Studien  zur  Geschichte  der  Medizin  herausgegeben  von  der 
Puschmann-Stiftung  an  der  Universitat  Leipzig,  1907-. 

Sudhoff,  Karl.  His  various  articles  in  the  foregoing  publi- 
cation and  other  periodicals  of  which  he  is  an  editor  lie 
in  large  measure  just  outside  our  period  and  field,  but 
some  will  be  noted  later  in  particular  chapters. 

Suter,  H.    Die  Mathematiker  und  Astronomen  der  Araber, 
in  Abhandl.,  X  (1900)  1-277;  XIV  (1902)  257-85. 
Die  astronomischen  Tafeln  des  Muhammed  ibn  Musa- 
al-Khwarizmi,  Copenhagen,  19 14. 

Tanner,  T.  Bibliotheca  Britannico-Hibernica,  London, 
1748.  Still  much  cited  but  largely  antiquated  and  un- 
reliable. 


xxxviii     MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Tavenner,  E,  Studies  in  Magic  from  Latin  Literature,  New 
York,  1 916. 

Taylor,  H.  O.    The  Classical  Heritage,  1901. 

The  Medieval  Mind,  2nd  edition,  1914,  2  vols;  3rd  edi- 
tion, 191 9. 

Theatrum  chemicum.    See  Zetzner. 

Theatrum  chemicum  Britannicum.    See  Ashmole. 

Theophilus  Presbyter,  Schedula  diversarum  artium,  ed.  A. 
Ilg,  Vienna,  1874;  English  translation  by  R.  Hendrie, 
London,  1847. 

Thomas  of  Cantimpre,  Bonum  universale  de  apibus,  15 16. 

Thompson,  D'Arcy  W.    Aristotle  as  a  Biologist,  1913. 
Glossary  of  Greek  Birds,  Oxford,  1895. 
Historia  animalium,  Oxford,  19 10;  vol.  IV  in  the  Eng- 
lish translation  of  The  Works  of  Aristotle  edited  by 
J.  A.  Smith  and  W.  D.  Ross. 

Thorndike,  Lynn.     Adelard  of  Bath  and  the  Continuity  of 
Universal  Nature,  in  Nature,  XCIV  (191 5)  616-7. 
A  Roman  Astrologer  as  a  Historical  Source :  Julius 
Firmicus    Maternus,     in    Classical    Philology,    VHI 
(1913)  415-35- 

Natural  Science  in  the  Middle  Ages,  in  Popular  Science 
Monthly  (now  The  Scientific  Monthly),  LXXXVH 
(1915)  271-91. 

Roger  Bacon  and  Gunpowder,  in  Science,  XLH 
(1915),  799-800. 

Roger  Bacon  and  Experimental  Method  in  the  Middle 
Ages,  in  The  Philosophical  Review,  XXIH  (1914), 
271-98. 

Some  Medieval  Conceptions  of  Magic,  in  The  Monist, 
XXV  (1915).  107-39. 

The  Attitude  of  Origen  and  Augustine  toward  Magic, 
in  The  Monist,  XIX  (1908),  46-66. 
The   Place  of   Magic   in  the  Intellectual   History  of 
Europe,  Columbia  University  Press,  1905. 
The  True  Roger  Bacon,  in  American  Historical  Re- 
view, XXI  (1916),  237-57,  468-80. 


WORKS  FREQUENTLY  CITED  xxxix 

Tiraboschi.      Storia   della    Letteratura   Italiana,    Modena, 

1772-1795. 
Tischendorf,  C.     Acta  Apostolorum  Apocrypha,  Leipzig, 

1851. 

Evang-elia  Apocrypha,  Leipzig,  1876. 
Toply,  R.  von,     Studien  zur  Geschichte  der  Anatomic  im 

Mittelalter,  1898. 
Unger,  F.    Die  Pflanze  als  Zaubermittel,  Vienna,  1859. 
Vacant,   A.    et   Mangenot,    E.     Dictionnaire   de   theologie 

catholique,  Paris,  1909-. 
Valentinelli,    J.     Bibliotheca    manuscripta    ad    S.     Marci 

Venetiarum,  Venice,  1 868-1 876,  6  vols. 
Valois,    Noel.     Guillaume   d'Auvergne,    eveque    de   Paris, 

1228-1249.     Sa  vie  et  ses  ouvrages,  Paris,  1880. 
Vincent  of  Beauvais.     Speculum  doctrinale,  1472  (?). 

Speculum  historiale,  1473. 

Speculum  naturale,  Anth.  Koburger,  Niimberg,  1485. 
Vossius,  G.  J.     De  Universae  Matheseos  natura  et  constitu- 

tione  liber,  Amsterdam,  1650. 
Walsh,  J.  J.    Medieval  Medicine,  1920,  221  pp. 

Old  Time  Makers  of  Medicine;  the  story  of  the  stu- 
dents and  teachers  of  the  sciences  related  to  medicine 

during  the  middle  ages,  New  York,  191 1.    Popular. 

The  Popes  and  Science,  1908. 
Webb,  C.  C.  L    See  John  of  Salisbury. 
Webster,  Hutton.    Rest  Days,  19 16. 
Wedel,  T.   C.     The  Medieval  Attitude  toward  Astrology 

particularly  in  England,  Yale  University  Press,  1920. 
Wellmann,  Max.    ed.  Dioscorides  de  materia  medica,  1907, 

1906. 

Die  Schrift  des  Dioskurides  Ilept  airXcJv  (j^apnaKchv,    1914. 
White,  A.  D.     A  History  of  the  Warfare  of  Science  with 

Theology  in  Christendom,  New  York,  1896,  2  vols. 
Wickersheimer,  Ernest.    Figures  medico-astrologiques  des 

neuvieme,  dixieme  et  onzieme  siecles,  in  Transactions 

of  the  Seventeenth  International  Congress  of  Medicine, 


xl  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Section  XXIII,  History  of  Medicine,  London,  1913, 

P-  313  ff. 
William  of  Auvergne.    Opera  omnia,  Venice,  1591. 
Withington,    E,    T.     Medical   History   from  the  Earliest 

Times,  London,  1894. 
Wright,  Thomas.     Popular  Treatises  on  Science  written 

during  the  middle  ages  in  Anglo-Saxon,  Anglo-Nor- 
man, and  English,  London,  1841, 

ed.  Alexander  Neckam  De  naturis  rerum,  in  RS  vol. 

34,  1863. 
Wulf,    M.    de.     History   of    Medieval    Philosophy,    1909, 

English  translation. 
Wiistenfeld,   F.      Geschichte   der   Arabischen   Aerzte   und 

Naturforscher,  Gottingen,  1840. 
Yule,  Sir  Henry,  The  Book  of  Ser  Marco  Polo,  third  edition 

revised  by  Henri  Cordier,  2  vols.,  London,  1903. 
Zarncke,  F.     Der  Priester  Johannes,  in  Abhandl.  d.  philol.- 

hist.  Classe,  Kgl.  Sachs.  Gesell.  d.  Wiss.,  VII  (1879), 

627-1030;  VIII  (1883),  1-186. 
Zetzner,  L.    Theatrum  chemicum,  161 3- 1622,  6  vols. 


A 

HISTORY  OF  MAGIC  AND 
EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 


VOLUME  I 


A  HISTORY  OF  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL 
SCIENCE  AND  THEIR  RELATION  TO  CHRISTIAN 
THOUGHT  DURING  THE  FIRST  THIRTEEN  CEN- 
TURIES OF  OUR  ERA 

CHAPTER  I 

INTRODUCTION 

Aim  of  this  book — Period  covered — How  to  study  the  history  of 
thought — Definition  of  magic — Magic  of  primitive  man ;  does  civiliza- 
tion originate  in  magic? — Divination  in  early  China — Magic  in  ancient 
Egypt — Magic  and  Egyptian  religion— Mortuary  magic — Magic  in  daily 
life — Power  of  words,  images,  amulets — Magic  in  Egyptian  medicine — 
Demons  and  disease — Magic  and  science — Magic  and  industry — Alchemy 
■ — Divination  and  astrology — The  sources  for  Assyrian  and  Babylonian 
magic — ^Was  astrology  Sumerian  or  Chaldean? — The  number  seven 
in  early  Babylonia — Incantation  texts  older  than  astrological — Other 
divination  than  astrology — Incantations  against  sorcery  and  demons — 
A  specimen  incantation — Materials  and  devices  of  magic — Greek  culture 
not  free  from  magic — Magic  in  myth,  literature,  and  history — Simul- 
taneous increase  of  learning  and  occult  science — Magic  origin  urged  for 
Greek  religion  and  drama — Magic  in  Greek  philosophy — Plato's  attitude 
toward  magic  and  astrology — Aristotle  on  stars  and  spirits — Folk-lore 
in  the  History  of  Animals — Differing  modes  of  transmission  of  ancient  . 
oriental  and  Greek  literature — More  magical  character  of  directly  trans- 
mitted Greek  remains — Progress  of  science  among  the  Greeks — Archi- 
medes and  Aristotle — Exaggerated  view  of  the  scientific  achievement 
of  the  Hellenistic  age — Appendix  I.  Some  works  on  Magic,  Religion, 
and  Astronomy  in  Babylonia  and  Assyria. 

"Magic   has  existed  among  all  peoples  and   at  every 
period." — Hegel} 

This  book  aims  to  treat  the  history  of  magic  and  expert-  Aim  of 

mental  science  and  their  relations  to  Christian  thought  dur-  ^^'^  ^odk. 

ing  the  first  thirteen  centuries  of  our  era,   with  especial 

emphasis  upon  the  twelfth  and  thirteenth  centuries.     No 

*  Lectures  on  the  Philosophy  of  Religion ;    quoted    by    Sir    James 
Frazer,  The  Magic  Art  (1911),  I,  426. 


2  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

adequate  survey  of  the  history  of  either  magic  or  experi- 
mental science  exists  for  this  period,  and  considerable  use 
of  manuscript  material  has  been  necessary  for  the  medieval 
period.  Magic  is  here  understood  in  the  broadest  sense  of 
the  word,  as  including  all  occult  arts  and  sciences,  supersti- 
tions, and  folk-lore.  I  shall  endeavor  to  justify  this  use 
of  the  word  from  the  sources  as  I  proceed.  My  idea  is 
that  magic  and  experimental  science  have  been  connected 
in  their  development;  that  magicians  were  perhaps  the 
first  to  experiment;  and  that  the  history  of  both  magic  and 
experimental  science  can  be  better  understood  by  studying 
them  together,  I  also  desire  to  make  clearer  than  it  has 
been  to  most  scholars  the  Latin  learning  of  the  medieval 
period,  whose  leading  personalities  even  are  generally  inac- 
curately known,  and  on  perhaps  no  one  point  is  illumination 
more  needed  than  on  that  covered  by  our  investigation.  The 
subject  of  laws  against  magic,  popular  practice  of  magic, 
the  witchcraft  delusion  and  persecution  lie  outside  of  the 
scope  of  this  book.^ 

At  first  my  plan  was  to  limit  this  investigation  to  the 
twelfth  and  thirteenth  centuries,  the  time  of  greatest 
medieval  productivity,  but  I  became  convinced  that  this 
period  could  be  best  understood  by  viewing  it  in  the  setting 
of  the  Greek,  Latin,  and  early  Christian  writers  to  whom 
it  owed  so  much.  If  the  student  of  the  Byzantine  Empire 
needs  to  know  old  Rome,  the  student  of  the  medieval  church 
to  comprehend  early  Christianity,  the  student  of  Romance 
languages  to  understand  Latin,  still  more  must  the  reader 
of  Constantinus  Africanus,  Vincent  of  Beauvais,  Guide 
Bonatti,  and  Thomas  Aquinas  be  familiar  with  the  Pliny, 
Galen,  and  Ptolemy,  the  Origen  and  Augustine,  the  Alkindi 
and  Albumasar  from  whom  they  drew.  It  would  indeed  be 
difficult  to  draw  a  line  anywhere  between  them.    The  ancient 

*That    field    has    already    been  soon    to   be    edited   by    Professor 

treated   by  Joseph   Hansen,   Zau-  George  L.  Burr  from  H.  C.  Lea's 

berwahn.  Inquisition  und  Hexen-  materials.     See   also  a  work  just 

prozess  im   ISfittelalter,   1900,   and  published  by  Miss  M.  A.  Murray, 

will  be   further  illuminated  by  A  The   Witch-Cult  in   Western  Eu' 

History  of  Witchcraft  in  Eurofie,  rope,  Oxford,  1921. 


1  INTRODUCTION  3 

authors  are  generally  extant  only  in  their  medieval  form; 
in  some  cases  there  is  reason  to  suspect  that  they  have 
undergone  alteration  or  addition;  sometimes  new  works 
were  fathered  upon  them.  In  any  case  they  have  been  pre- 
served to  us  because  the  middle  ages  studied  and  cherished 
them,  and  to  a  great  extent  made  them  their  own.  I  begin 
with  the  first  century  of  our  era,  because  Christian  thought 
begins  then,  and  then  appeared  Pliny's  Natural  History 
which  seems  to  me  the  best  starting  point  of  a  survey  of 
ancient  science  and  magic, ^  I  close  with  the  thirteenth 
century,  or,  more  strictly  speaking,  in  the  course  of  the  four- 
teenth, because  by  then  the  medieval  revival  of  learning  had 
spent  its  force.  Attention  is  centred  on  magic  and  experi- 
mental science  in  western  Latin  literature  and  learning, 
Greek  and  Arabic  works  being  considered  as  they  con- 
tributed thereto,  and  vernacular  literature  being  omitted  as 
either  derived  from  Latin  works  or  unlearned  and  unscien- 
tific. 

Very  probably  I  have  tried  to  cover  too  much  ground  How  to 
and  have  made  serious  omissions.     It  is  probably  true  that  f^^^^  *^^- 

^  -'  .     history  of 

for  the  history  of  thought  as  for  the  history  of  art  the  evi-  thought. 

dence  and  source  material  is  more  abundant  than  for  politi- 
cal or  economic  history.  But  fortunately  it  is  more  reliable, 
since  the  pursuit  of  truth  or  beauty  does  not  encourage 
deception  and  prejudice  as  does  the  pursuit  of  wealth  or 
power.  Also  the  history  of  thought  is  more  unified  and 
consistent,  steadier  and  more  regular,  than  the  fluctuations 
and  diversities  of  political  history;  and  for  this  reason  its 
general  outlines  can  be  discerned  with  reasonable  sureness 
by  the  examination  of  even  a  limited  number  of  examples, 
provided  they  are  properly  selected  from  a  period  of  suf- 
ficient duration.  Moreover,  it  seems  to  me  that  in  the 
present  stage  of  research  into  and  knowledge  of  our  subject 

^  Some  of  my  scientific  friends  a  treatment  of  the  science  of  the 
have  urged  me  to  begin  with  genuine  Aristotle  per  se,  although 
Aristotle,  as  being  a  much  abler  in  the  course  of  this  book  I  shall 
scientist  than  Pliny,  but  this  would  say  something  of  his  medieval  in- 
take us  rather  too  far  back  in  fluence  and  more  especially  of  the 
time  and  I  have  not  felt  equal  to  Pseudo-Aristotle. 


4  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 

sounder  conclusions  and  even  more  novel  ones  can  be  drawn 
by  a  wide  comparative  survey  than  by  a  minutely  intensive 
and  exhaustive  study  of  one  man  or  of  a  few  years.  The 
danger  is  of  writing  from  too  narrow  a  view-point,  magni- 
fying unduly  the  importance  of  some  one  man  or  theory, 
and  failing  to  evaluate  the  facts  in  their  full  historical 
setting.  No  medieval  writer  whether  on  science  or  magic 
can  be  understood  by  himself,  but  must  be  measured  in 
respect  to  his  surroundings  and  antecedents. 
Definition  Some  may  think  it  strange  that  I  associate  magic  so 

closely  with  the  history  of  thought,  but  the  word  comes 
from  the  Magi  or  wise  men  of  Persia  or  Babylon,  to  whose 
lore  and  practices  the  name  was  applied  by  the  Greeks  and 
Romans,  or  possibly  we  may  trace  its  etymology  a  little 
farther  back  to  the  Sumerian  or  Turanian  word  imga  or 
unga,  meaning  deep  or  profound.     The  exact  meaning  of 
the  word,  "magic,"  was  a  matter  of  much  uncertainty  even 
in  classical  and  medieval  times,  as  we  shall  see.     There  can 
be  no  doubt,  however,  that  it  was  then  applied  not  merely 
to  an  operative  art,  but  also  to  a  mass  of  ideas  or  doctrine, 
and  that  it  represented  a  way  of  looking  at  the  world.    This 
side  of  magic  has  sometimes  been  lost  sight  of  in  hasty  or 
assumed  modern  definitions  which  seem  to  regard  magic  as 
merely  a  collection  of  rites  and  feats.    In  the  case  of  primi- 
tive men  and  savages  it  is  possible  that  little  thought  accom- 
panies their  actions.     But  until  these  acts  are  based  upon 
or   related   to   some   imaginative,   purposive,   and   rational 
thinking,  the  doings  of  early  man  cannot  be  distinguished 
as  either  religious  or  scientific  or  magical.     Beavers  build 
dams,  birds  build  nests,  ants  excavate,  but  they  have  no 
magic  just  as  they  have  no  science  or  religion.     Magic  im- 
plies a  mental  state  and  so  may  be  viewed  from  the  stand- 
point of  the  history  of  thought.     In  process  of  time,  as  the 
learned  and  educated  lost  faith  in  magic,  it  was  degraded 
to  the  low  practices  and  beliefs  of  the  ignorant  and  vulgar. 
It  was  this  use  of  the  term  that  was  taken  up  by  anthro- 
pologists  and   by   them   applied  to  analogous   doings   and 


INTRODUCTION 


notions  of  primitive  men  and  savages.  But  we  may  go  too 
far  in  regarding  magic  as  a  purely  social  product  of  tribal 
society :  magicians  may  be,  in  Sir  James  Frazer's  words,^ 
"the  only  professional  class"  among  the  lowest  savages,  but 
note  that  they  rank  as  a  learned  profession  from  the  start. 
It  will  be  chiefly  through  the  writings  of  learned  men  that 
something  of  their  later  history  and  of  the  growth  of 
interest  in  experimental  science  will  be  traced  in  this  work. 
Let  me  add  that  in  this  investigation  all  arts  of  divination, 
including  astrology,  will  be  reckoned  as  magic;  I  have  been 
quite  unable  to  separate  the  two  either  in  fact  or  logic,  as  I 
shall  illustrate  repeatedly  by  particular  cases." 

Magic  is  very  old,  and  it  will  perhaps  be  well  in  this  in- 
troductory chapter  to  present  it  to  the  reader,  if  not  in  its 
infancy — for  its  origins  are  much  disputed  and  perhaps 
antecede  all  record  and  escape  all  observation — at  least  some 
centuries  before  its  Roman  and  medieval  days.  Sir  J.  G. 
Frazer,  in  a  passage  of  The  Golden  Bough  to  which  we 
have  already  referred,  remarks  that  "sorcerers  are  found 
in  every  savage  tribe  known  to  us;  and  among  the  lowest 
savages  .  .  .  they  are  the  only  professional  class  that 
exists."  ^  Lenormant  affirmed  in  his  Chaldean  Magic  and 
Sorcery  ^  that  "all  magic  rests  upon  a  system  of  religious 
belief,"   but   recent   sociologists   and   anthropologists   have 


^  Frazer  has,  of  course,  repeat- 
edly made  the  point  that  modern 
science  is  an  outgrowth  from 
primitive  magic.  Carveth  Read, 
The  Origin  of  Man,  1920,  in  his 
chapter  on  "Magic  and  Science" 
contends  that  "in  no  case  ...  is 
Science  derived  from  Magic"  (p. 
337),  but  this  is  mainly  a  logical 
and  ideal  distinction,  since  he 
admits  that  "for  ages"  science  "is 
in  the  hands  of  wizards." 

*_I  am  glad  to  see  that  other 
virriters  on  magic  are  taking  this 
view ;  for  instance,  E.  Doutte, 
Magie  et  religion  dans  I'Afrique 
du  Nord,  Alger,  1909,  p.  351. 

*  Golden  Bough,  1894,  I.  420. 
W.  I.  Thomas,  "The  Relation  of 
the   Medicine-Man   to  the   Origin 


of  the  Professional  Occupations" 
(reprinted  in  his  Source  Book  for 
Social  Origins,  4th  edition,  pp. 
281-303),  in  which  he  disputes 
Herbert  Spencer's  "thesis  that  the 
medicine-man  is  the  source  and 
origin  of  the  learned  and  artistic 
occupations,"  does  not  really  con- 
flict with  Frazer's  statement,  since 
for  Thomas  the  medicine-man  is 
a  priest  rather  than  a  magician. 
Thomas  remarks  later  in  the  same 
book  (p.  437),  "Furthermore,  the 
whole  attempt  of  the  savage  to 
control  the  outside  world,  so  far 
as  it  contained  a  theory  or  a  doc- 
trine, was  based  on  magic." 

*  Chaldean   Magic   and  Sorcery. 
1878,  p.  70. 


6  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 

inclined  to  regard  magic  as  older  than  a  belief  in  gods.  At 
any  rate  some  of  the  most  primitive  features  of  historical 
religions  seem  to  have  originated  from  magic.  Moreover, 
religious  cults,  rites,  and  priesthoods  are  not  the  only  things 
that  have  been  declared  inferior  in  antiquity  to  magic  and 
largely  indebted  to  it  for  their  origins.  Combarieu  in  his 
Music  and  Magic  ^  asserts  that  the  incantation  is  universally 
employed  in  all  the  circumstances  of  primitive  life  and 
that  from  it,  by  the  medium  it  is  true  of  religious  poetry,  all 
modern  music  has  developed.  The  magic  incantation  is, 
in  short,  "the  oldest  fact  in  the  history  of  civilization.'* 
Although  the  magician  chants  without  thought  of  aesthetic 
form  or  an  artistically  appreciative  audience,  yet  his  spell 
contains  in  embryo  all  that  later  constitutes  the  art  of  music. ^ 
M.  Paul  Huvelin,  after  asserting  with  similar  confidence 
that  poetry,^  the  plastic  arts,*  medicine,  mathematics,  astron- 
omy, and  chemistry  "have  easily  discernable  magic  sources," 
states  that  he  will  demonstrate  that  the  same  is  true  of  law.*^ 
Very  recently,  however,  there  has  been  something  of  a  reac- 
tion against  this  tendency  to  regard  the  life  of  primitive 
man  as  made  up  entirely  of  magic  and  to  trace  back  every 
phase  of  civilization  to  a  magical  origin.  But  R.  R.  Marett 
still  sees  a  higher  standard  of  value  in  primitive  man's  magic 
than  in  his  warfare  and  brutal  exploitation  of  his  fellows 
and  believes  that  the  "higher  plane  of  experience  for  which 
mana  stands  is  one  in  which  spiritual  enlargement  is  appre- 
ciated for  its  own  sake."  ^ 

Of  the  five  classics  included  in  the  Confucian  Canon, 
The  Book  of  Changes  (I  Citing  or  Yi-King),  regarded  by 

^  Jules    Combarieu,  La   musigue  Art,   London,    1900,    Chapter    xx, 

et  la  magie,  Paris,  1909,  p.  v.  "Art     and     Magic."       J.     Capart, 

^  Ibid.,  pp.  13-14.  Primitive  Art  in  Egypt. 

"Among       the    ,   early       Arabs  .  p_  Huvelin,  Magie  et  droit  in- 

AT'^      M    r^'^'f       utterance  ai^idud,    Paris,     1907,    in    Annee 

(Macdonald    (1909).   p.    16),    and  Sociologique,    X,    v-i?^;    see    too 

the  poet    a  wizard  m  league  with  ^.^   ^^/  /^^^^^^^^^   magiques   et  le 

spirits       (Nicholson,    A    Uterary  droit  romain,  Ukcon,iW 

History  of  the  Arabs,  1914,  p.  72).  ' 

*Sce    S.    Reinach,   "L'Art   et    la  '  R.   R.  Marett,  Psychology  and 

Magie,"  in  LAnthropologie,  XIV  Folk-Lore,    1920,    Chapter    iii    on 

(1903),  and  Y.   Hirn,   Origins   of  "Primitive  Values." 


I  INTRODUCTION  7 

some  as  the  oldest  work  in  Chinese  literature  and  dated 
back  as  early  as  3000  B.C.,  in  its  rudimentary  form  appears 
to  have  been  a  method  of  divination  by  means  of  eight 
possible  combinations  in  triplets  of  a  line  and  a  broken  line. 
Thus,  if  a  be  a  line  and  h  a  broken  line,  we  may  have  acui', 
bbb,  aab,  bba,  abb,  baa,  aba,  and  bah.  Possibly  there  is  a 
connection  with  the  use  of  knotted  cords  which,  Chinese 
writers  state,  preceded  written  characters,  like  the  method 
used  in  ancient  Peru.  More  certain  would  seem  the  resem- 
blance to  the  medieval  method  of  divination  known  as 
geomancy,  which  we  shall  encounter  later  in  our  Latin 
authors.  Magic  and  astrology  might,  of  course,  be  traced 
all  through  Chinese  history  and  literature.  But,  contenting 
ourselves  with  this  single  example  of  the  antiquity  of  such 
arts  in  the  civilization  of  the  far  east,  let  us  turn  to  other 
ancient  cultures  which  had  a  closer  and  more  unmistakable 
influence  upon  the  western  world. 

Of  the  ancient  Egyptians  Budge  writes,  "The  belief  in  Magic  in 
magic  influenced  their  minds  .  .  .  from  the  earliest  to  the  Egypt, 
latest  period  of  their  history  ...  in  a  manner  which,  at 
this  stage  in  the  history  of  the  world,  is  very  difficult  to 
understand."  -^  To  the  ordinary  historical  student  the  evi- 
dence for  this  assertion  does  not  seem  quite  so  overwhelm- 
ing as  the  Egyptologists  would  have  us  think.  It  looks 
thinner  when  we  begin  to  spread  it  out  over  a  stretch  of  four 

^  E.  A.  Wallis  Budge,  Egyptian  berspriiche  fur  Mutter  und  Kind, 

Magic,   1899,  p.  vii.     Some  other  1901.     F.     L.     Griffith     and     H. 

works    on    magic    in    Egypt    are:  Thompson,  The  Demotic  Magical 

Groff,    Etudes   sur   la   sorcellerie,  Papyrus   of  London  and  Leiden, 

memoires     presentes     a     I'institut  1904.     See    also    J.    H.    Breasted, 

egyptien,  Cairo,  1897;  G.  Busson,  Development     of     Religion     and 

Extrait    d'un    memoire    sur   fori-  Thought  in  Ancient  Egypt,   New 

gine  egyptienne  de  la  Kabhale,  in  York,  1912. 

Compte  Rendu  du  Congres  Scien-  The  following  later  but  briefer 

tiHque    International    des    Catho-  treatments    add    little    to    Budge: 

liques,  Sciences  Religieuses,  Paris,  Alfred    Wiedemann,    Magie    und 

1891,  pp.  29-51.  Adolf  Erman,  Life  Zauberei  im  Alten  ALgypten,  Leip- 

w  Ancient  Egypt,  English  transla-  zig,    1905,  and   Die   Amulette   der 

tion,    1894,    "describes   vividly  the  alten  ^gyptcr,  Leipzig,  1910,  both 

magical  conceptions  and  practices."  in    Der  Alte    Orient;    Alexandre 

F.  L.  Griffith,  Stories  of  the  High  Moret,    La    magic    dans    tEgypte 

Priests  of  Memphis,  Oxford,  1900,  ancienne,    Paris,    1906,    in    Musee 

contains    some    amusing    demotic  Guimet,  Annates,  Bibliotheque  de 

tales  of  magicians.     Erman,  Zau-  vulgarisation.  XX.  241-81. 


8 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Magic 
and 

Egyptian 
religion. 


Mortuary 
magic. 


thousand  years,  and  it  scarcely  seems  scientific  to  adduce 
details  from  medieval  Arabic  tales  or  from  the  late  Greek 
fiction  of  the  Pseudo-Callisthenes  or  from  papyri  of  the 
Christian  era  concerning  the  magic  of  early  Egypt.  And 
it  may  be  questioned  whether  two  stories  preserved  in  the 
Westcar  papyrus,  written  many  centuries  afterwards,  are 
alone  "sufficient  to  prove  that  already  in  the  Fourth  Dynasty 
the  working  of  magic  was  a  recognized  art  among  the 
Egyptians."  ^ 

At  any  rate  we  are  told  that  the  belief  in  magic  not  only 
was  predynastic  and  prehistoric,  but  was  "older  in  Egypt 
than  the  belief  in  God."  ^  In  the  later  religion  of  the  Egyp- 
tians, along  with  more  lofty  and  intellectual  conceptions, 
magic  was  still  a  principal  ingredient.^  Their  mythology 
was  affected  by  it  *  and  they  not  only  combated  demons 
with  magical  formulae  but  believed  that  they  could  terrify 
and  coerce  the  very  gods  by  the  same  method,  compelling 
them  to  appear,  to  violate  the  course  of  nature  by  miracles, 
or  to  admit  the  human  soul  to  an  equality  with  themselves.^ 

Magic  was  as  essential  in  the  future  life  as  here  on  earth 
among  the  living.  Many,  if  not  most,  of  the  observances 
and  objects  connected  with  embalming  and  burial  had  a 
magic  purpose  or  mode  of  operation;  for  instance,  the 
"magic  eyes  placed  over  the  opening  in  the  side  of  the  body 
through  which  the  embalmer  removed  the  intestines,"  ®  or 
the  mannikins  and  models  of  houses  buried  with  the  dead. 
In  the  process  of  embalming  the  wrapping  of  each  bandage 
was  accompanied  by  the  utterance  of  magic  words. '^  In  "the 
oldest   chapter   of   human   thought   extant" — the   Pyramid 


*  Budge  (1899),  p.  19.  At  pp.  7- 
10  Budge  dates  the  Westcar  Papy- 
rus about  1550  B.  C.  and  Cheops, 
of  whom  the  tale  is  told,  in  3800 
B.  C.  It  is  now  customary  to  date 
the  Fourth  Dynasty,  to  which 
Cheops  belonged,  about  2900-2750 
B.  C.  Breasted,  History  of  Egypt, 
pp.  122-3,  speaks  of  a  folk  tale 
preserved  in  the  Papyrus  Westcar 
some  nine  (?)  centuries  after  the 
fall  of  the  Fourth  Dynasty. 


*  Budge,  p.  ix. 

°  Budge,  pp.  xiii-xiv. 

*  For  magical  myths  see  E.  Na- 
ville,  The  Old  Egyptian  Faith, 
English  translation  by  C.  Camp- 
bell, 1909,  p.  23;^  et  seq. 

*  Budge,  pp.  3-4;  Lenormant, 
Chaldean  Magic,  p.  100;  Wiede- 
mann (1905),  pp.  12,  14,  31- 

"  So    labelled    in    the    Egyptian 
Museum  at  Cairo. 
'Budge,  p.  185. 


I  INTRODUCTION  9 

Texts  written  in  hieroglyphic  at  the  tombs  at  Sakkara  of 
Pharaohs  of  the  fifth  and  sixth  dynasties  (c,  2625-2475 
B.C.),  magic  is  so  manifest  that  some  have  averred  "that  the 
whole  body  of  Pyramid  Texts  is  simply  a  collection  of 
magical  charms."  ^  The  scenes  and  objects  painted  on  the 
walls  of  the  tombs,  such  as  those  of  nobles  in  the  fifth  and 
sixth  dynasties,  were  employed  with  magic  intent  and  were 
meant  to  be  realized  in  the  future  life;  and  with  the  twelfth 
dynasty  the  Egyptians  began  to  paint  on  the  insides  of  the 
coffins  the  objects  that  were  formerly  actually  placed 
within.^  Under  the  Empire  the  famous  Book  of  the  Dead 
is  a  collection  of  magic  pictures,  charms,  and  incantations 
for  the  use  of  the  deceased  in  the  hereafter,^  and  while  it  is 
not  of  the  early  period,  we  hear  that  "a  book  with  words  of 
magic  power"  was  buried  with  a  pharaoh  of  the  Old  King- 
dom. Budge  has  "no  doubt  that  the  object  of  every  reli- 
gious text  ever  written  on  tomb,  stele,  amulet,  coffin,  papy- 
rus, etc.,  was  to  bring  the  gods  under  the  power  of  the  de- 
ceased, so  that  he  might  be  able  to  compel  them  to  do  his 
will."  *  Breasted,  on  the  other  hand,  thinks  that  the  amount 
and  complexity  of  this  mortuary  magic  increased  greatly  in 
the  later  period  under  popular  and  priestly  influence.^ 

Breasted  nevertheless  believes  that  magic  had  played  Magic  in 
a  great  part  in  daily  life  throughout  the  whole  course  of  dailyhfe. 
Egyptian  history.  He  writes,  "It  is  difficult  for  the  modern 
mind  to  understand  how  completely  the  belief  in  magic  pene- 
trated the  whole  substance  of  life,  dominating  popular  cus- 
tom and  constantly  appearing  in  the  simplest  acts  of  the 
daily  household  routine,  as  much  a  matter  of  course  as 

^Breasted  (1912),  pp.  84-5,  93-5.  Day,"  Breasted,  History  of  Egypt, 

Systematic   study"   of   the    Pyra-  p.  175. 

mid  Texts  has  been  possible  "only  *r>  ^               o 

since    the    appearance    of    Sethe's  cudge,  p.  2S. 

great     edition,"— DiV     Altsgypti-  ^History  of  Egypt,  p.   175;  pp. 

schen     Pyramidentexte,     Leipzig,  249-50  for  the  further  increase  in 

l5K)8-i9io,  2  vols.  mortuary  magic  after  the  Middle 

^  Budge,  pp.  104-7.  Kingdom,  and  pp.  369-70,  390,  etc., 

Many   of   them   are   to   enable  for  Ikhnaton's  vain  effort  to  sup- 

the  dead  man  to  leave  his  tomb  at  press    this    mortuary    magic.     See 

will;    hence    the    Egyptian    title,  also  Breasted  (1912),  pp.  95-6,  281. 

'The  Chapters  of  Going  Forth  by  292-6,  etc. 


10 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Power  of 
words, 
images, 
amulets. 


Magit  in 
Egyptian 
medicine. 


sleep  or  the  preparation  of  food.  It  constituted  the  very 
atmosphere  in  which  the  men  of  the  early  oriental  world 
lived.  Without  the  saving  and  salutary  influence  of  such 
magical  agencies  constantly  invoked,  the  life  of  an  ancient 
household  in  the  East  was  unthinkable."  ^ 

Most  of  the  main  features  and  varieties  of  magic  known 
to  us  at  other  times  and  places  appear  somewhere  in  the 
course  of  Egypt's  long  history.  For  one  thing  we  find  the 
ascription  of  magic  power  to  words  and  names.  The  power 
of  words,  says  Budge,  was  thought  to  be  practically  un- 
limited, and  "the  Egyptians  invoked  their  aid  in  the  smallest 
as  well  as  in  the  greatest  events  of  their  life."  ^  Words 
might  be  spoken,  in  which  case  they  "must  be  uttered  in  a 
proper  tone  of  voice  by  a  duly  qualified  man,"  or  they  might 
be  written,  in  which  case  the  material  upon  which  they  were 
written  might  be  of  importance.^  In  speaking  of  mortuary 
magic  we  have  already  noted  the  employment  of  pictures, 
models,  mannikins,  and  other  images,  figures,  and  objects. 
Wax  figures  were  also  used  in  sorcery,^  and  amulets  are 
found  from  the  first,  although  their  particular  forms  seem 
to  have  altered  with  dififerent  periods.^  Scarabs  are  of 
course  the  most  familiar  example. 

Egyptian  medicine  was  full  of  magic  and  ritual  and 
its  therapeusis  consisted  mainly  of  "collections  of  incan- 
tations and  weird  random  mixtures  of  roots  and  refuse."  ® 
Already  we  find  the  recipe  and  the  occult  virtue  conceptions, 
the  elaborate  polypharmacy  and  the  accompanying  hocus- 
pocus  which  we  shall  meet  in  Pliny  and  the  middle  ages. 
The  Egyptian  doctors  used  herbs  from  other  countries  and 
preferred  compound  medicines  containing  a  dozen  ingredi- 
ents to   simple  medicines."^     Already  we  find   such  magic 


^Breasted  (1912),  pp.  290-1. 

*  Budge,  pp.  xi,  170-1. 

*  Budge,  p.  4. 

*  Budge,  pp.  67-70,  yz,  77- 
'  Budge,  pp.  27-28,  41,  60. 

'  From  the  abstract  of  a  paper 
on  The  History  of  Egyptian  Medi- 
cine, read  by  T.  Wingate  Todd  at 
the  annual  meeting  of  the  Ameri- 


can Historical  Association,  1919. 
See  also  B.  Holmes  and  P.  G. 
Kitterman,  Medicine  in  Ancient 
Egypt',  the  Hieratic  Material, 
Cincinnati,  1914,  34  pp.,  reprinted 
from  The  Lancet-Clinic. 

'  See  H.  L.  Liiring,  Die  Uber  die 
medicinischcn  Kenntnisse  der  al- 
ien Algypter  berichtenden  Papyri 


r  INTRODUCTION  ii 

log-Jc  as  that  the  hair  of  a  black  calf  will  keep  one  from 
growing  gray.^  Already  the  parts  of  animals  are  a  favorite 
ingredient  in  medical  compounds,  especially  those  connected 
with  the  organs  of  generation,  on  which  account  they  were 
presumably  looked  upon  as  life-giving,  or  those  which  were 
recommended  mainly  by  their  nastiness  and  were  probably 
thought  to  expel  the  demons  of  disease  by  their  disagreeable 
properties. 

In  ancient  Egypt,  however,  disease  seems  not  to  have  Demons 
been  identified  with  possession  by  demons  to  the  extent  that  disease, 
it  was  in  ancient  Assyria  and  Babylonia.  While  Breasted 
asserts  that  "disease  was  due  to  hostile  spirits  and  against 
these  only  magic  could  avail,"  ^  Budge  contents  himself  with 
the  more  cautious  statement  that  there  is  "good  reason  for 
thinking  that  some  diseases  were  attributed  to  .  .  .  evil 
spirits  .  ,  .  entering  .  .  .  human  bodies  .  .  .  but  the  texts 
do  not  afford  much  information"  ^  on  this  point.  Certainly 
the  beliefs  in  evil  spirits  and  in  magic  do  not  always  have 
to  go  together,  and  magic  might  be  employed  against  disease 
whether  or  not  it  was  ascribed  to  a  demon. 

In  the  case  of  medicine  as  in  that  of  religion  Breasted  Magic 
takes  the  view  that  the  amount  of  magic  became  greater  in  science- 
the  Middle  and  New  Kingdoms  than  in  the  Old  Kingdom. 
This  is  true  so  far  as  the  amount  of  space  occupied  by  it  in 
extant  records  is  concerned.  But  it  would  be  rash  to  assume 
that  this  marks  a  decline  from  a  more  rational  and  scientific 
attitude  in  the  Old  Kingdom.  Yet  Breasted  rather  gives 
this  impression  when  he  writes  concerning  the  Old  Kingdom 
that  many  of  its  recipes  were  useful  and  rational,  that 
"medicine  was  already  in  the  possession  of  much  empirical 
wisdom,  displaying  close  and  accurate  observation,"  and 
that  what  "precluded  any  progress  toward  real  science  was 
the  belief  in  magic,  which  later  began  to  dominate  all  the 

verglichen  mit  den  medic.  Schrif-  in   Zeitschrift  f.   cegypt.   Sprache, 

ten  griech.  u.  romischer  Autoren,  XII  (1874),  p.  106.    M.  A.  Ruffer, 

Leipzig,     1888.       Also     Joret,     I  Palaeopathology    of   Egypt,    ig2i. 

(1897)     310-11,    and    the     article  ^History  of  Egypt,  p.  loi. 

there  cited  by  G.  Ebers,  Ein  Ky-  ^  Ibid,  p.   102. 

phirecept  aus  dem  Papyrus  Ebers,  "  Budge,  p.  206. 


12 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Magic 

and 

industry. 


Alchemy. 


practice  of  the  physician."  ^  Berthelot  probably  places  the 
emphasis  more  correctly  when  he  states  that  the  later  medical 
papyri  "include  traditional  recipes,  founded  on  an  em- 
piricism which  is  not  always  correct,  mystic  remedies,  based 
upon  the  most  bizarre  analogies,  and  magic  practices  that 
date  back  to  the  remotest  antiquity."  "  The  recent  efforts 
of  Sethe  and  Wilcken,  of  Elliot  Smith,  Miiller,  and  Hooten 
to  show  that  the  ancient  Egyptians  possessed  a  considerable 
amount  of  medical  knowledge  and  of  surgical  and  dental 
skill,  have  been  held  by  Todd  to  rest  on  slight  and  dubious 
evidence.  Indeed,  some  of  this  evidence  seems  rather  to 
suggest  the  ritualistic  practices  still  employed  by  uncivil- 
ized African  tribes.  Certainly  the  evidence  for  any  real 
scientific  development  in  ancient  Egypt  has  been  very 
meager  compared  with  the  abundant  indications  of  the  preva- 
lence of  magic. ^ 

Early  Egypt  was  the  home  of  many  arts  and  industries, 
but  not  in  so  advanced  a  stage  as  has  sometimes  been  sug- 
gested. Blown  glass,  for  example,  was  unknown  until  late 
Greek  and  Roman  times,  and  the  supposed  glass-blowers 
depicted  on  the  early  monuments  are  really  smiths  engaged 
in  stirring  their  fires  by  blowing  through  reeds  tipped  with 
clay.**  On  the  other  hand,  Professor  Breasted  informs  me 
that  there  is  no  basis  for  Berthelot's  statement  that  "every 
sort  of  chemical  process  as  well  as  medical  treatment  was 
executed  with  an  accompaniment  of  religious  formulae,  of 
prayers  and  incantations,  regarded  as  essential  to  the  success 
of  operations  as  well  as  the  cure  of  maladies."  ^ 

Alchemy  perhaps  originated  on  the  one  hand  from  the 
practices  of  Egyptian  goldsmiths  and  workers  in  metals, 
who  experimented  with  alloys,^  and  on  the  other  hand  from 

*Petrie,  "Egypt,"  in  EB,  p.  7Z- 

*  Berthelot  (1885),  p.  235.  See 
E.  B.  Havell,  A  Handbook  of  In- 
dian Art,  1920,  p.  II,  for  a  com- 
bination of  "exact  science,"  ritual, 
and  "magic  power"  in  the  work 
of  the  ancient  Aryan  craftsmen. 

'Berthelot    (1889),  pp.   vi-vii. 


^History  of  Egypt,  p.  lOi. 

'  Archeologic  et  Hist  aire  des 
Sciences,  Paris,  1906,  pp.  232-3. 

*  Professor  Breasted,  however, 
feels  that  the  contents  of  the  new 
Edwin  Smith  Papyrus  will  raise 
our  estimate  of  the  worth  of  Egyp- 
tian medicine  and  surgery :  letter 
to  me  of  Jan.  20,  1922. 


I  INTRODUCTION  13 

the  theories  of  the  Greek  philosophers  concerning  world- 
grounds,  first  matter,  and  the  elements.^  The  words, 
alchemy  and  chemistry,  are  derived  ultimately  from  the 
name  of  Egypt  itself,  Kamt  or  Qemt,  meaning  literally  black, 
and  applied  to  the  Nile  mud.  The  word  was  also  applied 
to  the  black  powder  produced  by  quicksilver  in  Egyptian 
metallurgical  processes.  This  powder.  Budge  says,  was  sup- 
posed to  be  the  ground  of  all  metals  and  to  possess  mar- 
velous virtue,  "and  was  mystically  identified  with  the  body 
which  Osiris  possessed  in  the  underworld,  and  both  were 
thought  to  be  sources  of  life  and  power."  ^  The  analogy  to 
the  sacrament  of  the  mass  and  the  marvelous  powers 
ascribed  to  the  host  by  medieval  preachers  like  Stephen  of 
Bourbon  scarcely  needs  remark.  The  later  writers  on 
alchemy  in  Greek  appear  to  have  borrowed  signs  and  phrase- 
ology from  the  Egyptian  priests,  and  are  fond  of  speaking 
of  their  art  as  the  monopoly  of  Egyptian  kings  and  priests 
who  carved  its  secrets  on  ancient  steles  and  obelisks.  In 
a  treatise  dating  from  the  twelfth  dynasty  a  scribe  recom- 
mends to  his  son  a  work  entitled  Chemi,  but  there  is  no 
proof  that  it  was  concerned  with  chemistry  or  alchemy.* 
The  papyri  containing  treatises  of  alchemy  are  of  the  third 
century  of  the  Christian  era. 

Evidences  of  divination  in  general  and  of  astrology  in  Divina- 
particular  do  not  appear  as  early  in  Egyptian  records  as  astrology, 
examples  of  other  varieties  of  magic.  Yet  the  early  date 
at  which  Egypt  had  a  calendar  suggests  astronomical  inter- 
est, and  even  those  who  deny  that  seven  planets  were  dis- 
tinguished in  the  Tigris-Euphrates  Valley  until  the  last 
millennium  before  Christ,  admit  that  they  were  known  in 
Egypt  as  far  back  as  the  Old  Kingdom,  although  they  deny 
the  existence  of  a  science  of  astronomy  or  an  art  of  astrology 
then.^  A  dream  of  Thotmes  IV  is  preserved  from  1450  B.C. 
or  thereabouts,  and  the  incantations  employed  by  magicians 

'Berthelot  (1885),  pp.  247-78;   E.  ''Berthelot   (1885),  p.  10. 

O.^v.  Lippmann  (1919),  pp.  118-43.  ••  Lippmann     C1919),    pp.     181-2, 

Budge,  pp.   19-20.  and  the  authorities  there  cited. 


14  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

in  order  to  procure  divining  dreams  for  their  customers 
attest  the  close  connection  of  divination  and  magic.^  BeHef 
in  lucky  and  unlucky  days  is  shown  in  a  papyrus  calendar  of 
about  1300  B.C.,^  and  w^e  shall  see  later  that  "Egyptian 
Days"  continued  to  be  a  favorite  superstition  of  the  middle 
ages.  Tables  of  the  risings  of  stars  which  may  have  an  astro- 
logical significance  have  been  found  in  graves,  and  there  were 
gods  for  every  month,  every  day  of  the  month,  and  every 
hour  of  the  day,^  Such  numbers  as  seven  and  twelve  are  fre- 
quently emphasized  in  the  tombs  and  elsewhere,  and  if  the 
vaulted  ceiling  in  the  tenth  chamber  of  the  tomb  of  Sethos 
is  really  of  his  time,  we  seem  to  find  the  signs  of  the  zodiac 
under  the  nineteenth  dynasty.  If  Boll  is  correct  in  suggest- 
ing that  the  zodiac  originated  in  the  transfer  of  animal  gods 
to  the  sky,*  no  fitter  place  than  Egypt  could  be  found  for 
the  transfer.  But  there  have  not  yet  been  discovered  in 
Egypt  lists  of  omens  and  appearances  of  constellations  on 
days  of  disaster  such  as  are  found  in  the  literature  of  the 
Tigris-Euphrates  valley  and  in  the  Roman  historians.  Budge 
speaks  of  the  seven  Hathor  goddesses  who  predict  the  death 
that  the  infant  must  some  time  die,  and  affirms  that  "the 
Egyptians  believed  that  a  man's  fate  .  .  .  was  decided  be- 
fore he  was  born,  and  that  he  had  no  power  to  alter  it."  ^ 
But  I  cannot  agree  that  "we  have  good  reason  for  assigning 
the  birthplace  of  the  horoscope  to  Egypt,"  ®  since  the  evidence 
seems  to  be  limited  to  the  almost  medieval  Pseudo-Callis- 
thenes  and  a  Greek  horoscope  in  the  British  Museum  to  which 
is  attached  the  letter  of  an  astrologer  urging  his  pupil  to 
study  the  ancient  Egyptians  carefully.  The  later  Greek  and 
Latin  tradition  that  astrology  was  the  invention  of  the  divine 
men  of  Egypt  and  Babylon  probably  has  a  basis  of  fact,  but 
more  contemporary  evidence  is  needed  if  Egypt  is  to  contest 
the  claim  of  Babylon  to  precedence  in  that  art. 

^  Budge,  pp.  214-5.  Annales  du  service  des  antiquites 

*  Budge,  pp.  225-8;   Wiedemann  dc  I'Egyptc,  I  (1900),  79-90. 

(1905),  p.  g.  *F.  Boll  in  Neue  Jahrb.  (1908), 

•Wiedemann  (1905),  pp.  7,8,11.  p.  108. 

See  also  G.  Daressy,  Une  ancienne  "  Budge,  pp.  222-3. 

liste     des     decans     egyptiens,     in  "  Budge,  p.  229. 


INTRODUCTION 


15 


In  the  written  remains  of  Babylonian  and  Assyrian 
civilization  ^  the  magic  cuneiform  tablets  play  a  large  part 
and  give  us  the  impression  that  fear  of  demons  v^as  a  lead- 
ing feature  of  Assyrian  and  Babylonian  religion  and  that 
daily  thought  and  life  were  constantly  affected  by  magic. 
The  bulk  of  the  religious  and  magical  texts  are  preserved  in 
the  library  of  Assurbanipal,  king  of  Assyria  from  668  to 
626  B.C.  But  he  collected  his  library  from  the  ancient 
temple  cities,  the  scribes  tell  us  that  they  are  copying  very 
ancient  texts,  and  the  Sumerian  language  is  still  largely 
employed.^  Eridu,  one  of  the  main  centers  of  early  Su- 
merian culture,  "was  an  immemorial  home  of  ancient  wis- 
dom, that  is  to  say,  magic."  ^  It  is,  however,  difficult  in 
the  library  of  Assurbanipal  to  distinguish  what  is  Baby- 
lonian from  what  is  Assyrian  or  what  is  Sumerian  from 
vvhat  is  .Semitic.  Thus  we  are  told  that  "with  the  exception 
of  some  very  ancient  texts,  the  Sumerian  literature,  con- 
sisting largely  of  religious  material  such  as  hymns  and 
incantations,  shows  a  number  of  Semitic  loanwords  and 
grammatical  Semitisms,  and  in  many  cases,  although  not 
always,  is  quite  patently  a  translation  of  Semitic  ideas  by 
Semitic  priests  into  the  formal  religious  Sumerian  lan- 
guage." 4 

The  chief  point  in  dispute,  over  which  great  controversy 
has  taken  place  recently  among  German  scholars,  is  as  to 
the  antiquity  of  both  astronomical  knowledge  and  astrologi- 
cal doctrine,  including  astral  theology,  among  the  dwellers 
in  the  Tigris-Euphrates  region.  Briefly,  such  writers  as 
Winckler,  Stiicken,  and  Jeremias  held  that  the  religion  of 
the  early  Babylonians  was  largely  based  on  astrology  and 
that  all  their  thought  was  permeated  by  it,  and  that  they 
had  probably  by  an  early  date  made  astronomical  observa- 
tions and  acquired  astronomical  knowledge  which  was  lost 

*  Some  works  on  the  subject  of  ^Thompson,  Semitic  Magic,  pp. 

magic  and  religion,  astronomy  and      xxxvi-xxxvii ;    Fossey,    pp.    17-20. 
astrology       in       Babylonia       and  ^  Farnell,    Greece   and   Babylon, 

Assyria  will  be  found  in  Appendix      p.   102. 

I  at  the  close  of  this  chapter.  ■*  Prince,    "Sumer    and    Sumeri- 

ans,"  in  EB. 


The 

sources  for 
Assyrian 
and  Baby- 
lonian 
magic. 


Was 

astrology 
Sumerian 
or  Chal- 
dean? 


i6 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


The  num- 
ber seven 
in  early 
Babylonia. 


in  the  decline  of  their  culture.  Opposing  this  view,  such 
scholars  as  Kugler,  Bezold,  Boll,  and  Schiaparelli  have 
shown  the  lack  of  certain  evidence  for  either  any  consid- 
erable astronomical  knowledge  or  astrological  theory  in  the 
Tigris-Euphrates  Valley  until  the  late  appearance  of  the 
Chaldeans.  It  is  even  denied  that  the  seven  planets  were 
distinguished  in  the  early  period,  much  less  the  signs  of  the 
zodiac  or  the  planetary  week,^  which  last,  together  with  any 
real  advance  in  astronomy,  is  reserved  for  the  Hellenistic 
period. 

Yet  the  prominence  of  the  number  seven  in  myth,  re- 
ligion, and  magic  is  indisputable  in  the  third  millennium 
before  our  era.  For  instance,  in  the  old  Babylonian  epic  of 
creation  there  are  seven  winds,  seven  spirits  of  storms,  seven 
evil  diseases,  seven  divisions  of  the  underworld  closed  by 
seven  doors,  seven  zones  of  the  upper  world  and  sky,  and 
so  on.  We  are  told,  however,  that  the  staged  towers  of 
Babylonia,  which  are  said  to  have  symbolized  for  millen- 
niums the  sacred  Hebdomad,  did  not  always  have  seven 
stages.^  But  the  number  seven  was  undoubtedly  of  frequent 
occurrence,  of  a  sacred  and  mystic  character,  and  virtue  and 
perfection  were  ascribed  to  it.  And  no  one  has  succeeded 
in  giving  any  satisfactory  explanation  for  this  other  than 
the  rule  of  the  seven  planets  over  our  world.  This  also 
applies  to  the  sanctity  of  the  number  seven  in  the  Old  Testa- 
ment ^  and  the  emphasis  upon  it  in  Hesiod,  the  Odyssey, 
and  other  early  Greek  sources.^ 

anthrop.  Gesellsch.  in  Wien,  XXI 
(1901),  225-74;  see  also  Hehn, 
Sieben::ahl    und    Sabbat    bei    den 


^Webster,  Rest  Days,  pp.  215-22, 
with  further  bibliography.  See 
Orr  (1913),  28-38,  for  an  inter- 
esting discussion  in  English  of  the 
problem  of  the  origin  of  solar  and 
lunar  zodiac. 

"Lippmann  (1919),  pp.  168-9. 

*  Although  Schiaparelli,  Astron- 
omy in  the  Old  Testament,  1905, 
PP-  V,  5,  49-51.  135,  denies  that 
"the  frequent  use  of  the  number 
seven  in  the  Old  Testament  is  in 
any  way  connected  with  the  plan- 
ets." I  have  not  seen  F.  von 
Andrian,  Die  Sicbenzahl  im  Geis- 
tesleben  der  Volker,  in  Mittcil.  d. 


Babyloniern  und  im  alien  Testa- 
ment, 1907.  J.  G.  Frazer  (1918), 
I,  140,  has  an  interesting  passage 
on  the  prominence  of  the  number 
seven  "alike  in  the  Jehovistic  and 
in  the  Babylonian  narrative"  of 
the  flood. 

*  Webster,  Rest  Days,  pp.  211-2. 
Professor  Webster,  who  kindly 
read  this  chapter  in  manuscript, 
stated  in  a  letter  to  me  of  2  July 
1921  that  he  remained  convinced 
that    "the    mystic    properties    as- 


INTRODUCTION 


17 


However  that  may  be,  the  tendency  prevaiHng  at  present 
is  to  regard  astrology  as  a  relatively  late  development  intro- 
duced by  the  Semitic  Chaldeans.  Lenormant  held  that 
writing  and  magic  were  a  Turanian  or  Sumerian  (Acca- 
dian)  contribution  to  Babylonian  civilization,  but  that 
astronomy  and  astrology  were  Semitic  innovations.  Jas- 
trow  thinks  that  there  was  slight  difference  between  the 
religion  of  Assyria  and  that  of  Babylonia,  and  that  astral 
theology  played  a  great  part  in  both ;  but  he  grants  that  the 
older  incantation  texts  are  less  influenced  by  this  astral 
theology.  L.  W.  King  says,  "Magic  and  divination  bulk 
largely  in  the  texts  recovered,  and  in  their  case  there  is  noth- 
ing to  suggest  an  underlying  astrological  element."  ^ 

Whatever  its  date  and  origin,  the  magic  literature  may 
be  classified  in  three  main  groups.  There  are  the  astrological 
texts  in  which  the  stars  are  looked  upon  as  gods  and  pre- 
dictions are  made  especially  for  the  king,^  Then  there  are 
the  tablets  connected  with  other  methods  of  foretelling  the 
future,  especially  liver  divination,  although  interpretation 
of  dreams,  augury,  and  divination  by  mixing  oil  and  water 
were  also  practiced.^  Fossey  has  further  noted  the  close 
connection  of  operative  magic  with  divination  among  the 
Assyrians,  and  calls  divination  "the  indispensable  auxiliary 
of  magic."  Many  feats  of  magic  imply  a  precedent  knowl- 
edge of  the  future  or  begin  by  consultation  of  a  diviner, 
or  a  favorable  day  and  hour  should  be  chosen  for  the  magic 
rite.* 

Third,  there  are  the  collections  of  incantations,  not  how- 
ever those   employed  by  the   sorcerers,   which  were   pre- 


cribed  to  the  number  seven"  can 
only  in  part  be  accounted  for  by 
the  seven  planets ;  "Our  Ameri- 
can Indians,  for  example,  hold 
seven  in  great  respect,  yet  have 
no  knowledge  of  seven  planets." 
But  it  may  be  noted  that  the  poet- 
philosophers  of  ancient  Peru  com- 
posed verses  on  the  subject  of  as- 
trology, according  to  Garcilasso 
(cited  by  W.  I.  Thomas,  Source 
Book  for  Social  Origins,  1909,  p. 


293)- 

*  L.  W.  King,  History  of  Baby- 
lon, 1915,  p.  299. 

^Fossey  (1902),  pp.  2-3. 

'  Farnell,  Greece  and  Babylon, 
pp.  301-2.  On  liver  divination  see 
Frothingham,  "Ancient  Oriental- 
ism Unveiled,"  American  Journal 
of  Archaeology,  XXI  (1917)  55, 
187,  313,  420. 

*  Fossey,  p.  66. 


Incanta- 
tion texts 
older  than 
the  astro- 
logical. 


Other 
divination 
than 
astrology. 


i8 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Incanta- 
tions 
against 
sorcery 
and 
demons. 


A  speci- 
men incan- 
tation. 


sumably  illicit  and  hence  not  publicly  preserved — in  an 
incantation  which  we  shall  soon  quote  sorcery  is  called  evil 
and  is  said  to  employ  "impure  things" — but  rather  defen- 
sive measures  against  them  and  exorcisms  of  evil  demons.^ 
But  doubtless  this  counter  magic  reflects  the  original  pro- 
cedure to  a  great  extent.  Inasmuch  as  diseases  generally 
were  regarded  as  due  to  demons,  who  had  to  be  exorcized 
by  incantations,  medicine  was  simply  a  branch  of  magic. 
Evil  spirits  were  also  held  responsible  for  disturbances 
in  nature,  and  frequent  incantations  were  thought  necessary 
to  keep  them  from  upsetting  the  natural  order  entirely.^ 
The  various  incantations  are  arranged  in  series  of  tablets : 
the  Maklu  or  burning,  Ti'i  or  headaches,  Asakki  marsuti  or 
fever,  Labartu  or  hag-demon,  and  Nis  kati  or  raising  of  the 
hand.  Besides  these  tablets  there  are  numerous  ceremonial 
and  medical  texts  which  contain  magical  practice.^  Also 
hymns  of  praise  and  religious  epics  which  at  first  sight  one 
would  not  classify  as  mcantations  seem  to  have  had  their 
magical  uses,  and  Farnell  suggests  that  "a  magic  origin  for 
the  practice  of  theological  exegesis  may  be  obscurely 
traced."  *  Good  spirits  are  represented  as  employing  magic 
and  exorcisms  against  the  demons.^  As  a  last  resort  when 
good  spirits  as  well  as  human  magic  had  failed  to  check  the 
demons,  the  aid  might  be  requisitioned  of  the  god  Ea,  re- 
garded as  the  repository  of  all  science  and  who  "alone  was 
possessed  of  the  magic  secrets  by  means  of  which  they  could 
be  conquered  and  repulsed."  ^ 

The  incantations  themselves  show  that  other  factors  than 
the  power  of  words  entered  into  the  magic,  as  may  be  illus- 
trated by  quoting  one  of  them. 


"Arise  ye  great  gods,  hear  my  complaint. 
Grant  me  justice,  take  cognizance  of  my  condition. 
I  have  made  an  image  of  my  sorcerer  and  sorceress; 

^Fossey,  p.  i6.  *  Greece  and  Babylon,  p.  296. 

JLenormant,  pp.  35.   \f,  }58.  »Lenormant,  pp.  146-7. 

Thompson,  Semitic  Magic,  pp.  '  ^^     ^ 

xxxviii-xxxix.  ^  Ibid,  p.   158. 


1  INTRODUCTION  19 

I  have  humbled  myself  before  you  and  bring  to  you  my 
cause, 

Because  of  the  evil  they  have  done, 

Of  the  impure  things  which  they  have  handled. 

May  she  die !    Let  me  live ! 

May  her  charm,  her  witchcraft,  her  sorcery  be  broken. 

May  the  plucked  sprig  of  the  hinu  tree  purify  me; 

May  it  release  me;  may  the  evil  odor  of  my  mouth  be 
scattered  to  the  winds. 

May  the  mashfakal  herb  which  fills  the  earth  cleanse  me. 

Before  you  let  me  shine  like  the  kankal  herb, 

Let  me  be  brilliant  and  pure  as  the  lardn  herb. 

The  charm  of  the  sorceress  is  evil; 

May  her  words  return  to  her  mouth,  her  tongue  be  cut  off. 

Because  of  her  witchcraft  may  the  gods  of  night  smite  her, 

The  three  watches  of  the  night  break  her  evil  charm. 

May  her  mouth  be  wax ;  her  tongue,  honey. 

May  the  word  causing  my  misfortune  that  she  has  spoken 
dissolve  like  wax. 

May  the  charm  she  had  wound  up  melt  like  honey. 

So  that  her  magic  knot  be  cut  in  twain,  her  work  de- 
stroyed." ^ 

It  is  evident  from  this  incantation  that  use  was  made   Materials 
of  magic  images  and  knots,  and  of  the  properties  of  trees   and 

devices 

and  herbs.     Magic  images  were  made  of  clay,  wax,  tallow,   employed 

and  other  substances  and  were  employed  in  various  ways.    *"  *^^ 

.  magic. 

Thus  directions  are  given  for  making  a  tallow  image  of  an 
enemy  of  the  king  and  binding  its  face  with  a  cord  in  order 
to  deprive  the  person  whom  it  represents  of  speech  and  will- 
power.^ Images  were  also  constructed  in  order  that  disease 
demons  might  be  magically  transferred  into  them,^  and 
sometimes  the  images  are  slain  and  buried.^  In  the  above 
incantation  the  magic  knot  was  employed  only  by  the  sor- 
ceress,  but   Fossey   states   that   knots   were   also   used  as 

^Jastrow,  Religion   of  Babylon  'Ibid.,  p.  161. 

and  Assyria,  pp.  283-4. 
*  Zimmern,  Beitrdge,  p.  173.  *  Fossey,  p.  399. 


20  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 

counter-charms  against  the  demons.^     In  the  above  incan- 
tation the  names  of  herbs  were  left  untranslated  and  it  is 
not  possible  to  say  much  concerning  the  pharmacy  of  the 
Assyrians  and  Babylonians  because  of  our  lack  of  a  lexicon 
for  their  botanical  and  mineralogical  terminology.^     How- 
ever,  from  what  scholars  have  been  able  to  translate  it 
appears  that  common  rather  than  rare  and  outlandish  sub- 
stances were  the  ones  most  employed.     Wine  and  oil,  salt 
and  dates,  and  onions  and  saliva  are  the  sort  of  things  used. 
There  is  also  evidence  of  the  employment  of  a  magic  wand.^ 
Gems  and  animal  substances  were  used  as  well  as  herbs ;  all 
sorts  of  philters  were  concocted ;  and  varied  rites  and  cere- 
monies were  employed  such  as  ablutions  and  fumigations. 
In  the  account  of  the  ark  of  the  Babylonian  Noah  we  are 
told  of  the  magic  significance  of  its  various  parts;  thus  the 
mast  and  cabin  ceiling  were  made  of  cedar,  a  wood  that 
counteracts  sorceries.* 

One  remarkable  corollary  of  the  so-called  Italian  Renais- 

?nr!\of'  sance  or  Humanistic  movement  at  the  close  of  the  middle 

mric'"""    ^ges  with  its  too  exclusive  glorification  of  ancient  Greece 

"'^^''''         and   Rome  has  been  the   strange  notion  that  the  ancient 

Hellenes  were  unusually  free  from  magic  compared  with 

other  periods  and  peoples.   It  would  have  been  too  much  to 

claim  any  such  immunity  for  the  primitive  Romans,  whose 

entire  religion  was  originally  little  else  than  magic  and  whose 

daily  life,  public  and  private,  was  hedged  in  by  superstitious 

observances  and  fears.     But  they,  too,  were  supposed  to 

have  risen  later  under  the  influence  of  Hellenic  culture  to 

a  more  enlightened  stage,^  only  to  relapse  again  into  magic 

in  the  declining   empire   and   middle   ages  under  oriental 

influence.     Incidentally  let  me  add  that  this  notion  that  m 

the  past   orientals   were  more   superstitious   and   fond  of 

^Fossey,  p.  83.                         ,  form. 

'Ibid.,   pp.   89-91.     F.   Kuchler,  ^Lenormant,  p.  190- 

Beitrdge  sur  Kenntnis  dcr  Assyr.-  *  Jbid     n    159 

Babyl.   Median;    Texte   mit    Urn-  '',.,,       a  ;.  f^nt^  th^f  thev 

schrift,   Uebersetzung  und   Kom-  '  So  enlightened  in  fact  that  they 

menU    Leipzig,    1904.    treats    of  spoke    with    some    scorn    of    th 

twenty  facsimile  pages  of  cunei-  "levity"  and    lies    of  the  UrecKS. 


INTRODUCTION 


21 


marvels  than  westerners  in  the  same  stage  of  civilization 
and  that  the  orient  must  needs  be  the  source  of  every  super- 
stitious cult  and  romantic  tale  is  a  glib  assumption  which  I 
do  not  intend  to  make  and  which  our  subsequent  investiga- 
tion will  scarcely  substantiate.  But  to  return  to  the  sup- 
posed immunity  of  the  Hellenes  from  magic;  so  far  has  this 
hypothesis  been  carried  that  textual  critics  have  repeatedly 
rejected  passages  as  later  interpolations  or  even  called  entire 
treatises  spurious  for  no  other  reason  than  that  they  seemed 
to  them  too  superstitious  for  a  reputable  classical  author. 
Even  so  specialized  and  recent  a  student  of  ancient  astrol- 
ogy, superstition,  and  religion  as  Cumont  still  clings  to  this 
dubious  generalization  and  affirms  that  "the  limpid  Hellenic 
genius  always  turned  away  from  the  misty  speculations  of 
magic."  ^  But,  as  I  suggested  some  sixteen  years  since, 
"the  fantasticalness  of  medieval  science  was  due  to  'the 
clear  light  of  Hellas'  as  well  as  to  the  gloom  of  the  'dark 
ages,      ^ 

It  is  not  difficult  to  call  to  mind  evidence  of  the  presence 
of  magic  in  Hellenic  religion,  literature,  and  history.  One 
has  only  to  think  of  the  many  marvelous  metamorphoses  in  and 
Greek  mythology  and  of  its  countless  other  absurdities;  of  "*^*°^y' 
the  witches,  Circe  and  Medea,  and  the  necromancy  of 
Odysseus ;  or  the  priest-magician  of  Apollo  in  the  Iliad  who 
could  stop  the  plague,  if  he  wished ;  of  the  lucky  and  unlucky 
days  and  other  agricultural  magic  in  Hesiod.^  Then  there 
were  the  Spartans,  whose  so-called  constitution  and  method 
of  education,  much  admired  by  the  Greek  philosophers,  were 
largely  a  retention  of  the  life  of  the  primitive  tribe  with  its 
ritual  and  taboos.  Or  we  remember  Herodotus  and  his 
childish  delight  in  ambiguous  oracles  or  his  tale  of  seceders 
from  Gela  brought  back  by  Telines  single-handed  because 
he  "was  possessed  of  certain  mysterious  visible  symbols  of 
the  powers  beneath  the  earth  which  were  deemed  to  be  of 

^  Oriental    Religions   in    Roman  ^  E.   E.   Sikes,   Folk-lore  in  the 

Paganism,  Chicago,   191 1,  p.   189.         Works   and   Days    of   Hesiod.    in 

The  Classical  Review.  VII  (1893). 
^Thorndike    (1905),  p.  63.  390. 


Magic 
in  mytli, 
literature. 


22 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Simul- 
taneous in- 
crease of 
learning 
and  occult 
science. 


Magic  ori- 
gin urged 
for  Greek 
religion 
and  drama. 


wonder-working  power."  ^  We  recall  Xenophon's  punc- 
tilious records  of  sacrifices,  divinations,  sneezes,  and  dreams; 
Nicias,  as  afraid  of  eclipses  as  if  he  had  been  a  Spartan;  and 
the  matter-of-fact  mentions  of  charms,  philters,  and  incan- 
tations in  even  such  enlightened  writers  as  Euripides  and 
Plato.  Among  the  titles  of  ancient  Greek  comedies 
magic  is  represented  by  the  Goetes  of  Aristophanes,  the 
Mandragorizomene  of  Alexis,  the  Pharmacomantis  of  An- 
axandrides,  the  Circe  of  Anaxilas,  and  the  Thettcde  of 
Menander.^  When  we  candidly  estimate  the  significance  of 
such  evidence  as  this,  we  realize  that  the  Hellenes  were  not 
much  less  inclined  to  magic  than  other  peoples  and  periods, 
and  that  we  need  not  wait  for  Theocritus  and  the  Greek 
romances  or  for  the  magical  papyri  for  proof  of  the 
existence  of  magic  in  ancient  Greek  civilization.^ 

If  astrology  and  some  other  occult  sciences  do  not 
appear  in  a  developed  form  until  the  Hellenistic  period,  it 
is  not  because  the  earlier  period  was  more  enlightened,  but 
because  it  was  less  learned.  And  the  magic  which  Osthanes 
is  said  to  have  introduced  to  the  Greek  world  about  the 
time  of  the  Persian  wars  was  not  so  much  an  innovation 
as  an  improvement  upon  their  coarse  and  ancient  rites  of 
Goetia.'^ 

This  magic  element  which  existed  from  the  start  in 
Greek  culture  is  now  being  traced  out  by  students  of  anthro- 
pology and  early  religion  as  well  as  of  the  classics.  Miss 
Jane  E.  Harrison,  in  Themis,  a  study  of  the  social  origins 
of  Greek  religion,  suggests  a  magical  explanation  for  many 
a  myth  and  festival,  and  even  for  the  Olympic  games  and 
Greek  drama.^     The  last  point  has  been  developed  in  more 


^  Freeman,  History  of  Sicily,  I, 
IOI-3,  citing  Herodotus  VII,  153. 

'  Butler  and  Owen,  Apulei 
Apologia,  note  on  30,  30. 

*  For  details  concerning  opera- 
tive or  vulgar  magic  among 
the  ancient  Greeks  see  Hubert, 
Magia,  in  Daremberg-Saglio ;  Abt, 
Die  Apologie  dcs  Apulcius  von 
Madaura  und  die  antike  Zau- 
berei,     Giessen,      1908;     and     F. 


B.  Jevons,  "Grseco-Italian  Magic," 
p.  93-,  in  Anthropology  and  the 
Classics,  ed.  R.  Marett;  and  the 
article  "Magic"  in  ERE. 

*  I  think  that  this  sentence  is  an 
approximate  quotation  from  some 
ancient  author,  possibly  Diogenes 
Laertius,  but  I  have  not  been  able 
to  find  it. 

"J.  E.  Harrison,  Themis,  Cam- 
bridge,  1912.     The  chapter  head- 


I  INTRODUCTION  23 

detail  by  F,  M.  Comford's  Origin  of  Attic  Comedy,  where 
much  magic  is  detected  masquerading  in  the  comedies  of 
Aristophanes.^  And  Mr.  A.  B.  Cook  sees  the  magician  in 
Zeus,  who  transforms  himself  to  pursue  his  amours,  and 
contends  that  "the  real  prototype  of  the  heavenly  weather- 
king  was  the  earthly"  magician  or  rain-maker,  that  the 
pre-Homeric  "fixed  epithets"  of  Zeus  retained  in  the 
Homeric  poems  "are  simply  redolent  of  the  magician,"  and 
that  the  cult  of  Zeus  Lykaios  was  connected  with  the  belief 
in  werwolves.^  In  still  more  recent  publications  Dr.  Rendel 
Harris  ^  has  connected  Greek  gods  in  their  origins  with  the 
woodpecker  and  mistletoe,  associated  the  cult  of  Apollo 
with  the  medicinal  virtues  of  mice  and  snakes,  and  in  other 
ways  emphasized  the  importance  in  early  Greek  religion  and 
culture  of  the  magic  properties  of  animals  and  herbs. 

These  writers  have  probably  pressed  their  point  too  far, 
but  at  least  their  work  serves  as  a  reaction  against  the  old 
attitude  of  intellectual  idolatry  of  the  classics.  Their  views 
may  be  offset  by  those  of  Mr,  Famell,  who  states  that 
"while  the  knowledge  of  early  Babylonian  magic  is  begin- 
ning to  be  considerable,  we  cannot  say  that  we  know 
anything  definite  concerning  the  practices  in  this  department 
of  the  Hellenic  and  adjacent  peoples  in  the  early  period 
with  which  we  are  dealing."  And  again,  "But  while  Baby- 
lonian magic  proclaims  itself  loudly  in  the  great  religious 
literature  and  highest  temple  ritual,  Greek  magic  is  barely 
mentioned  in  the  older  literature  of  Greece,  plays  no  part 
at  all  in  the  hymns,  and  can  only  with  difficulty  be  dis- 
covered as  latent  in  the  higher  ritual.     Again,  Babylonian 

ings  briefly  suggest  the  argument:  on     Ritual     Forms    preserved     in 

"i.    Hymn    of    the    Kouretes ;    2.  Greek     tragedy;     9.     Daimon     to 

Dithyramb,  Aqco|xevov,  and  Drama ;  Olympian;     10.    The    Olympians; 

3.    Kouretes,    Thunder-Rites    and  11.  Themis." 

Mana ;  4.  a.   Magic  and  Tabu,  b.  ^  F.     M.     Cornf ord,     Origin    of 

Medicine-bird  and  Medicine-king;  Attic  Comedy,  1914,  see  especially 

S.  Totemism,  Sacrament,  and  Sac-  pp.  10,  13,  55,  157,  202,  22,2- 

rifice ;  6.  Dithyramb,   Spring  Fes-  ^  A.  B.  Cook,  Zeus,  Cambridge, 

tival,  and  Hagia  Triada  Sarcoph-  1914,  pp.   134-5,   12-14,  66-76. 

agus ;    7.    Origin    of    the    Olympic  ^  Rendel    Harris,    Picus   who    is 

Games   (about  a  year-daimon)  ;  8.  also   Zeus,   1916;    The   Ascent  of 

Daimon  and  Hero,  with  Excursus  Olympus,   1917. 


24  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 

magic  is  essentially  demoniac ;  but  we  have  no  evidence  that 
the  pre-Homeric  Greek  was  demon-ridden,  or  that  demon- 
ology  and  exorcism  were  leading  factors  in  his  consciousness 
and  practice."  Even  Mr.  Farnell  admits,  however,  that 
"the  earliest  Hellene,  as  the  later,  was  fully  sensitive  to  the 
magico-divine  efficacy  of  names."  ^  Now  to  believe  in  the 
power  of  names  before  one  believes  in  the  existence  of 
demons  is  the  best  possible  evidence  of  the  antiquity  of 
magic  in  a  society,  since  it  indicates  that  the  speaker  has 
confidence  in  the  operative  power  of  his  own  words  without 
any  spiritual  or  divine  assistance. 
Magic  in  Moreover,  in  one  sense  the  advocates  of  Greek  magic 

Greek  phi-  \^2JVQ.  not  gone  far  enough.  They  hold  that  magic  lies  back 
of  the  comedies  of  Aristophanes;  what  they  might  contend 
is  that  it  was  also  contemporary  with  them.^  They  hold 
that  classical  Greek  religion  had  its  origins  in  magic ;  what 
they  might  argue  is  that  Greek  philosophy  never  freed 
itself  from  magic.  "That  Empedocles  believed  himself 
capable  of  magical  powers  is,"  says  Zeller,  "proved  by  his 
own  writings."  He  himself  "declares  that  he  possesses  the 
power  to  heal  old  age  and  sickness,  to  raise  and  calm  the 
winds,  to  summon  rain  and  drought,  and  to  recall  the 
dead  to  life."  ^  H  the  pre-Homeric  fixed  epithets  of 
Zeus  are  redolent  of  magic,  Plato's  Timaeus  is  equally  redo- 
lent of  occult  science  and  astrology;  and  if  we  see  the 
weather-making  magician  in  the  Olympian  Zeus  of  Phidias, 
we  cannot  explain  away  the  vagaries  of  the  Timaeus  as 
flights  of  poetic  imagination  or  try  to  make  out  Aristotle 
a  modern  scientist  by  mutilating  the  text  of  the  History  of 
Animals. 

'  Farnell,   Greece   and  Babylon,  Ancients,  in  Folk-lore,   1890,  and 

pp.  292,  lyS-g.  E.  H.  Klatsche,  The  Supernatural 

'  See  Ernest  Riess,  Superstitions  in  the  Tragedies  of  Euripides,  in 

and    Popular    Beliefs    in     Greek  University    of   Nebraska    Studies, 

Tragedy,   in    Transactions   of    the  1919. 

American  Philological  Associa-  '  See  Zeller,  Pre-Socratic  Phi- 
tion,  vol.  27  (1896),  pp.  5-34;  and  losophy,  II  (1881),  119-20,  for  fur- 
On  Ancient  superstition,  ibid.  26  ther  boasts  by  Empedocles  himself 
(1895),  40-55.  Also  J.  G.  Frazer,  and  other  marvels  attributed  to 
Some  Popular  Superstitions  of  the  him  by  later  authors. 


I  INTRODUCTION  25 

Toward  magic  so-called  Plato's  attitude  in  his  Laws  is  Plato's 
cautious.  He  maintains  that  medical  men  and  prophets  and  ^ttitude 
diviners  can  alone  understand  the  nature  of  poisons  (or  magic  and 
spells)  which  work  naturally,  and  of  such  things  as  incan-  ^^^^^  °^^* 
tations,  magic  knots,  and  wax  images;  and  that  since  other 
men  have  no  certain  knowledge  of  such  matters,  they  ought 
not  to  fear  but  to  despise  them.  He  admits  nevertheless 
that  there  is  no  use  in  trying  to  convince  most  men  of  this 
and  that  it  is  necessary  to  legislate  against  sorcery.^  Yet 
his  own  view  of  nature  seems  impregnated,  if  not  actually 
with  doctrines  borrowed  from  the  Magi  of  the  east,  at  least 
with  notions  cognate  to  those  of  magic  rather  than  of 
modern  science  and  with  doctrines  favorable  to  astrology. 
He  humanized  material  objects  and  confused  material  and 
spiritual  characteristics.  He  also,  like  authors  of  whom 
we  shall  treat  later,  attempted  to  give  a  natural  or  rational 
explanation  for  magic,  accounting,  for  example,  for  liver 
divination  on  the  ground  that  the  liver  was  a  sort  of  mirror 
on  which  the  thoughts  of  the  mind  fell  and  in  which  the 
images  of  the  soul  were  reflected ;  but  that  they  ceased  after 
death.^  He  spoke  of  harmonious  love  between  the  elements 
as  the  source  of  health  and  plenty  for  vegetation,  beasts, 
and  men,  and  their  "wanton  love"  as  the  cause  of  pestilence 
and  disease.  To  understand  both  varieties  of  love  "in  rela- 
tion to  the  revolutions  of  the  heavenly  bodies  and  the 
seasons  of  the  year  is  termed  astronomy,"  ^  or,  as  we  should 
say,  astrology,  whose  fundamental  law  is  the  control  of 
inferior  creation  by  the  motion  of  the  stars.  Plato  spoke 
of  the  stars  as  "divine  and  eternal  animals,  ever  abiding,"  * 
an  expression  which  we  shall  hear  reiterated  in  the  middle 
ages.  "The  lower  gods,"  whom  he  largely  identified  with 
the  heavenly  bodies,  form  men,  who,  if  they  live  good  lives, 
return  after  death  each  to  a  happy  existence  in  his  proper 
star.^    Such  a  doctrine  is  not  identical  with  that  of  nativities 

^Laws,  XI,  933   (Steph.).  *  Timaeus,  p.  40  (Steph.)  ;  Jow- 

'Timacus,  p.  71    (Steph.).  ett,  III,  459. 
'Symposium,   p.    188    (Steph.)  ; 

in  Jowett's  translation,  I,  558.  ^ Ibid.,  pp.  41-42   (Steph.). 


26 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Aristotle 
on  stars 
and  spirits. 


Folk-lore 
in  the 
History  of 
Animals. 


and  the  horoscope,  but  hke  it  exalts  the  importance  of  the 
stars  and  suggests  their  control  of  human  life.  And  when 
at  the  close  of  his  Republic  Plato  speaks  of  the  harmony  or 
music  of  the  spheres  of  the  seven  planets  and  the  eighth 
sphere  of  the  fixed  stars,  and  of  "the  spindle  of  Necessity 
on  which  all  the  revolutions  turn,"  he  suggests  that  when 
once  the  human  soul  has  entered  upon  this  life,  its  destiny 
is  henceforth  subject  to  the  courses  of  the  stars.  When  in 
the  Timaeiis  he  says,  "There  is  no  difficulty  in  seeing  that 
the  perfect  number  of  time  fulfills  the  perfect  year  when  all 
the  eight  revolutions  .  .  .  are  accomplished  together  and 
attain  their  completion  at  the  same  time,"  ^  he  seems  to 
suggest  the  astrological  doctrine  of  the  magnns  annus,  that 
history  begins  to  repeat  itself  in  every  detail  when  the 
heavenly  bodies  have  all  regained  their  original  positions. 

For  Aristotle,  too,  the  stars  were  "beings  of  superhuman 
intelligence,  incorporate  deities.  They  appeared  to  him  as 
the  purer  forms,  those  more  like  the  deity,  and  from  them 
a  purposive  rational  influence  upon  the  lower  life  of  the 
earth  seemed  to  proceed, — a  thought  which  became  the  root 
of  medieval  astrology."  ^  Moreover,  "his  theory  of  the 
subordinate  gods  of  the  spheres  of  the  planets  .  .  .  pro- 
vided for  a  later  demonology."  ^ 

Aside  from  bits  of  physiognomy  and  of  Pythagorean 
superstition,  or  mysticism,  Aristotle's  History  of  Animals 
contains  much  on  the  influence  of  the  stars  on  animal  life, 
the  medicines  employed  by  animals,  and  their  friendships 
and  enmities,  and  other  folklore  and  pseudo-science.*     But 


^  Timaeus,  p.  39  (Steph.)  ; 
Jowett,   III,  458. 

'W.  Windelband,  History  of 
Philosophy,  English  translation  by 
J.  H.  Tufts,  1898,  p.  147. 

'Windelband,  History  of  An- 
cient Philosophy,  English  transla- 
tion by  H.  E.  Cushman,  1899. 

■Tor  a  number  of  examples, 
which  might  be  considerably  mul- 
tiplied   if    books    VII-X   are    not 


rejected  as  spurious,  see  Thorn- 
dike  (1905),  pp.  62-3.  T.  E. 
Lones,  Aristotle's  Researches  in 
Natural  Science,  London,  1912, 
274  pp.,  discusses  "Aristotle's 
method  of  investigating  the  natu- 
ral sciences,"  and  a  large  number 
of  Aristotle's  specific  statements 
showing  whether  they  were  cor- 
rect or  incorrect.  The  best  trans- 
lation of  the  History  of  Animals 
is  by  D'Arcy  W.  Thompson,  Ox- 
ford  1910,  with  valuable  notes. 


1  INTRODUCTION  27 

the  oldest  extant  manuscript  of  that  work  dates  only  from 

the  twelfth  or  thirteenth  century  and  lacks  the  tenth  book. 

Editors  of  the  text  have  also  rejected  books  seven  and  nine, 

the  latter  part  of  book  eight,  and  have  questioned  various 

other  passages.     However,  these  expurgations  save  the  face 

of  Aristotle  rather  than  of  Hellenic  science  or  philosophy 

generally,  as  the  spurious  seventh  book  is  held  to  be  drawn 

largely    from    Hippocratic   writings   and   the   ninth    from 

Theophrastus.^ 

There  is  another  point  to  be  kept  in  mind  in  any  com-  Differing 

parison  of  Egypt  and  Babylon  or  Assyria  with  Greece  in  "lodes 

the  matter  of  magic.     Our  evidence  proving  the  great  part  mission  of 

played  by  magic  in  the  ancient  oriental  civilizations  comes   oriemal 

directly  from  them  to  us  without  intervening  tampering  or  and  Greek 
•  -1  r      1  1  •     1  T^         literature. 

alteration  except  m  the  case  of  the  early  periods.  But 
classical  literature  and  philosophy  come  to  us  as  edited  by 
Alexandrian  librarians  ^  and  philologers,  as  censored  and 
selected  by  Christian  and  Byzantine  readers,  as  copied  or 
translated  by  medieval  monks  and  Italian  humanists.  And 
the  question  is  not  merely,  what  have  they  added  ?  but  also, 
what  have  they  altered?  what  have  they  rejected?  Instead 
of  questioning  superstitious  passages  in  extant  works  on 
the  ground  that  they  are  later  interpolations,  it  would  very 
likely  be  more  to  the  point  to  insert  a  goodly  number  on 
the  ground  that  they  have  been  omitted  as  pagan  or  idola- 
trous superstitions. 

Suppose  we  turn   to  those   writings  which  have  been   j^Qj-e 
unearthed  just  as  they  were  in  ancient  Greek;  to  the  papyri,  i^agical 
the  lead  tablets,  the  so-called  Gnostic  gems.     How  does  the   of  directly 
proportion   of   magic  in   these   compare  with  that   in    the   Qreek"'^^^^ 
indirectly  transmitted  literary  remains?     If  it  is  objected   remains. 
that  the  magic  papyri  ^  are  mainly  of  late  date  and  that 

*  See  the  edition  of  the  History  the  Hbrary  of  Assurbanipal. 
of  Animals  by  Dittmeyer   (1907),  'A  list  of  magic  papyri  and  of 
p.  vii,  where  various  monographs  publications  up  to  about  1900  deal- 
will  be  found  mentioned.  ing    with    the    same    is    given    in 

^  Perhaps    pure    literature    was  Hubert's     article     on     Magia    in 

over-emphasized    in    the    Museum  Daremberg-Saglio,  pp.  1503-4.   See 

at  Alexandria,  and  magic  texts  in  also    Sir   Herbert   Thompson   and 


28  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 

they  are  found  in  Egypt,  it  may  be  replied  that  they  are 
as  old  as  or  older  than  any  other  manuscripts  we  have  of 
classical  literature  and  that  its  chief  store-house,  too,  was 
in  Egypt  at  Alexandria,  As  for  the  magical  curses  written 
on  lead  tablets,^  they  date  from  the  fourth  centur}'  before 
our  era  to  the  sixth  after,  and  fourteen  come  from  Athens 
and  sixteen  from  Cnidus  as  against  one  from  Alexandria 
and  eleven  from  Carthage.  And  although  some  display 
extreme  illiteracy,  others  are  written  by  persons  of  rank 
and  education.  And  what  a  wealth  of  astrological  manu- 
scripts in  the  Greek  language  has  been  unearthed  in  Euro- 
pean libraries  by  the  editors  of  the  Catalogus  Codicum 
Graecoriini  Astrologorum!  ^  And  occasionally  archaeolo- 
gists report  the  discovery  of  magical  apparatus  ^  or  of  repre- 
sentations of  magic  in  works  of  art. 
Progress  In  thus  contending  that  Hellenic  culture  was  not  free 

among"he  from  magic  and  that  even  the  philosophy  and  science  of  the 
Greeks.  ancient  Greeks  show  traces  of  superstition,  I  would  not,  how- 
ever, obscure  the  fact  that  of  extant  literary  remains  the 
Greek  are  the  first  to  present  us  with  any  very  considerable 
body  either  of  systematic  rational  speculation  or  of  classified 
collection  of  observed  facts  concerning  nature.  Despite  the 
rapid  progress  in  recent  years  in  knowledge  of  prehistoric 
man  and  Egyptian  and  Babylonian  civilization,  the  Hellenic 

F.   L.   Griffith,    The  Magical  De-  lent,     Defixionum     tabulae,     etc., 

motic    Papyrus    of    London    and  Paris,   1904,  568  pp.     R.  Wiinsch, 

Leiden,  3   vols.,    1909-1921;    Cata-  Defixionum  Tabcllae  Atficae,  iSgy, 

logue   of   Demotic   Papyri   in   the  and   Scthianische    I'crfiuchungsta- 

Jolin   Rylands   Library,  Manch^s-  feln    aus    Rom     (390-420    A.D.), 

ter,  zvitii  facsimiles  and  complete  Leipzig,  1898. 

translations,  1909,  3  vols.    Grenfell  ,„•            or.          •               1 

(1921),  p.  159,  says,  "A  corpus  of  Since     1898    various     volumes 

the  magical  papyri  was  projected  ^"^  ^^l^.^  have  appeared  under  the 

in    Germany    by    K.    Preisendanz  ^ditorship  of  Cuinont    Kroll    Boll, 

before    the    war,    and    a     Czech  Ohvieri.  Bassi    and  others      Much 

scholar,  Dr.   Hopfner,  is  engaged  ^^  ^he  material  noted  is  of  course 

upon    the   difficult    task   of    eluci-  POst-classical    and    Byzantine,   and 

dating  them  "  °^    Christian    authorship    or  Ara- 

'  W.  C.  Battle,  Magical  Curses  ^'^  °"Sin. 

Written     on     Lead     Tablets,     in  '  For  example,   see  R.  Wiinsch, 

Transactions     of     the     American  Antikcs     Zaubergcrdt     aus     Per- 

Philological     Association,     XXVI  gamou,     in      Jahrb.     d.      kaiserl. 

(1895),  pp.  liv-lviii,  a  synopsis  of  deutsch.  archccol.  Instit.,  suppl.  VI 

a    Harvard    dissertation.      Audol-  (1905),  p.  19. 


I  INTRODUCTION  29 

title  to  the  primacy  in  philosophy  and  science  has  hardly 
been  called  in  question,  and  no  earlier  works  have  been 
discovered  that  can  compare  in  medicine  with  those  ascribed 
to  Hippocrates,  in  biology  with  those  of  Aristotle  and 
Theophrastus,  or  in  mathematics  and  physics  with  those  of 
Euclid  and  Archimedes.  Undoubtedly  such  men  and  writ- 
ings had  their  predecessors,  probably  they  owed  something 
to  ancient  oriental  civilization,  but,  taking  them  as  we  have 
them,  they  seem  to  be  marked  by  great  original  power. 
Whatever  may  lie  concealed  beneath  the  surface  of  the  past, 
or  whatever  signs  or  hints  of  scientific  investigation  and 
knowledge  we  may  think  we  can  detect  and  read  between 
the  lines,  as  it  were,  in  other  phases  of  older  civilizations, 
in  these  works  solid  beginnings  of  experimental  and  mathe- 
matical science  stand  unmistakably  forth. 

"An  extraordinarily  large  proportion  of  the  subject  Archime- 
matter  of  the  writings  of  Archimedes,"  says  Heath,  "repre-  Aristotle 
sents  entirely  new  discoveries  of  his  own.  Though  his 
range  of  subjects  was  almost  encyclopaedic,  embracing 
geometry  (plane  and  solid),  arithmetic,  mechanics,  hydro- 
statics and  astronomy,  he  was  no  compiler,  no  writer  of 
text-books.  .  .  .  His  objective  is  always  some  new  thing, 
some  definite  addition  to  the  sum  of  knowledge,  and  his  com- 
plete originality  cannot  fail  to  strike  anyone  who  reads  his 
works  intelligently,  without  any  corroborative  evidence  such 
as  is  found  in  the  introductory  letters  prefixed  to  most  of 
them.  ...  In  some  of  his  subjects  Archimedes  had  no  fore- 
runners, e.  g.,  in  hydrostatics,  where  he  invented  the  whole 
science,  and  (so  far  as  mathematical  demonstration  was 
concerned)  in  his  mechanical  investigations."  ^  Aristotle's 
History  of  Animals  is  still  highly  esteemed  by  historians  of 
biology  ^  and  often  evidences  "a  large  amount  of  personal 

^T.   L.   Heath,   The   Works  of  Aristotle's  Researches  in  Natural 

Archimedes,  Cambridge,  1897,  pp.  Science,  London,  1912.    Professor 

xxxix-xl.  W.   A.   Locy,   author   of   Biology 

^  On  "Aristotle  as  a  Biologist"  and  Its  Makers,  writes  me  (May- 
see  the  Herbert  Spencer  lecture  by  9,  1921)  that  in  his  opinion  G.  H. 
D'Arcy  W.  Thompson,  Oxford,  Lewes,  Aristotle;  a  Chapter  from 
1913.  31   pp.     Also  T.   E.   Lones,  the  History  of  Science,  London, 


30 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Exagger- 
ated view 
of  the 
scientific 
achieve- 
ment of 
the  Hellen- 
istic age. 


observations,"  ^  "great  accuracy,"  and  "minute  inquiry,"  as 
in  his  account  of  the  vascular  system  ^  or  observations  on 
the  embryology  of  the  chick.^  "Most  wonderful  of  all, 
perhaps,  are  those  portions  of  his  book  in  which  he  speaks  of 
fishes,  their  diversities,  their  structure,  their  wanderings,  and 
their  food.  Here  we  may  read  of  fishes  that  have  only 
recently  been  rediscovered,  of  structures  only  lately  reinves- 
tigated, of  habits  only  of  late  made  known."  ^  But  of  the 
achievements  of  Hellenic  philosophy  and  Hellenistic  science 
the  reader  may  be  safely  assumed  already  to  have  some 
notion. 

But  in  closing  this  brief  preliminary  sketch  of  the  period 
before  our  investigation  proper  begins,  I  would  take  excep- 
tion to  the  tendency,  prevalent  especially  among  German 
scholars,  to  center  in  and  confine  to  Aristotle  and  the 
Hellenistic  age  almost  all  progress  in  natural  science  made 
before  modern  times.  The  contributions  of  the  Egyptians 
and  Babylonians  are  reduced  to  a  minimum  on  the  one  hand, 
while  on  the  other  the  scientific  writings  of  the  Roman 


1864,  "dwells  too  much  on  Aris- 
totle's errors  and  imperfections, 
and  in  several  instances  omits  the 
quotation  of  important  positive 
observations,  occurring  in  the 
chapters  from  which  he  makes  his 
quotations  of  errors."  Professor 
Locy  also  disagrees  with  Lewes' 
estimate  of  De  generatione  as 
Aristotle's  masterpiece  and  thinks 
that  "naturalists  will  get  more 
satisfaction  out  of  reading  the 
Historia  animalium"  than  either 
the  De  generatione  or  De  partihus. 
Thompson  (1913),  p.  14,  calls 
Aristotle  "a  very  great  naturalist." 

^  This  quotation  is  from  Pro- 
fessor Locy's  letter  of  May  9, 
192 1. 

^  The  quotations  are  from  a  note 
by  Professor  D'Arcy  W.  Thomp- 
son on  his  translation  of  the 
Historia  animalium,  III,  3.  The 
note  gives  so  good  a  glimpse  of 
both  the  merits  and  defects  of  the 
Aristotelian  text  as  it  has  reached 
us  that  I  will  quote  it  here  more 
fully: 


"The  Aristotelian  account  of  the 
vascular  system  is  remarkable  for 
its  wealth  of  details,  for  its  great 
accuracy  in  many  particulars,  and 
for  its  extreme  obscurity  in  others. 
It  is  so  far  true  to  nature  that  it 
is  clear  evidence  of  minute  in- 
quiry, but  here  and  there  so 
remote  from  fact  as  to  suggest 
that  things  once  seen  have  been 
half  forgotten,  or  that  supersti- 
tion was  in  conflict  with  the  result 
of  observation.  The  account  of 
the  vessels  connecting  the  left  arm 
with  the  liver  and  the  right  with 
the  spleen  ...  is  a  surviving  ex- 
ample of  mystical  or  superstitious 
belief.  It  is  possible  that  the 
ascription  of  three  chambers  to 
the  heart  was  also  influenced  by 
tradition  or  mysticism,  much  in 
the  same  way  as  Plato's  notion  of 
the  three  corporeal  faculties." 

*  Professor  Locy  called  my  at- 
tention to  it  in  a  letter  of  May  17, 
1921.  See  also  Thompson  (1913), 
p.  14. 

*  Thompson  (1913),  p.  19. 


I  INTRODUCTION  31 

Empire,  which  are  extant  in  far  greater  abundance  than 
those  of  the  Hellenistic  period,  are  regarded  as  inferior  imita- 
tions of  great  authors  whose  works  are  not  extant;  Posi- 
donius,  for  example,  to  whom  it  has  been  the  fashion  of  the 
writers  of  German  dissertations  to  attribute  this,  that,  and 
every  theory  in  later  writers.  But  it  is  contrary  to  the  law 
of  gradual  and  painful  acquisition  of  scientific  knowledge 
and  improvement  of  scientific  method  that  one  period  of  a 
few  centuries  should  thus  have  discovered  everything.  We 
have  disputed  the  similar  notion  of  a  golden  age  of  early 
Egyptian  science  from  which  the  Middle  and  New  King- 
doms declined,  and  have  not  held  that  either  the  Egyptians 
or  Babylonians  had  made  great  advances  in  science  before 
the  Greeks.  But  that  is  not  saying  that  they  had  not  made 
some  advance.  As  Professor  Karpinski  has  recently  written: 
"To  deny  to  Babylon,  to  Egypt,  and  to  India,  their  part 
in  the  development  of  science  and  scientific  thinking  is  to 
defy  the  testimony  of  the  ancients,  supported  by  the  dis- 
coveries of  the  modern  authorities.  The  efforts  which  have 
been  made  to  ascribe  to  Greek  influence  the  science  of  Egypt, 
of  later  Babylon,  of  India,  and  that  of  the  Arabs  do  not 
add  to  the  glory  that  was  Greece.  How  could  the  Baby- 
lonians of  the  golden  age  of  Greece  or  the  Hindus,  a  little 
later,  have  taken  over  the  developments  of  Greek  astron- 
omy? This  would  only  have  been  possible  if  they  had 
arrived  at  a  state  of  development  in  astronomy  which  would 
have  enabled  them  properly  to  estimate  and  appreciate  the 
work  which  was  to  be  absorbed.  .  .  .  The  admission  that 
the  Greek  astronomy  immediately  affected  the  astronomical 
theories  of  India  carries  with  it  the  implication  that  this 
science  had  attained  somewhat  the  same  level  in  India  as  in 
Greece.  Without  serious  questioning  we  may  assume  that 
a  fundamental  part  of  the  science  of  Babylon  and  Egypt 
and  India,  developed  during  the  times  which  we  think  of  as 
Greek,  was  indigenous  science."  ^ 

*L.   C.  Karpinski,   "Hindu  Science,"  in  The  American  Mathematical 
Monthly,   XXVI    (1919),  298-300. 


32  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE    chap,  i 

Nor  am  I  ready  to  admit  that  the  great  scientists  of  the 
early  Roman  Empire  merely  copied  from,  or  were  distinctly 
inferior  to,  their  Hellenistic  predecessors.  Aristarchus  may 
have  held  the  heliocentric  theory  ^  but  Ptolemy  must  have 
been  an  abler  scientist  and  have  supported  his  incorrect 
hypothesis  with  more  accurate  measurements  and  calcula- 
tions or  the  ancients  would  have  adopted  the  sounder  view. 
And  if  Herophilus  had  really  demonstrated  the  circulation 
of  the  blood,  so  keen  an  intelligence  as  Galen's  would  not 
have  cast  his  discovery  aside.  And  if  Ptolemy  copied 
Hipparchus,  are  we  to  imagine  that  Hipparchus  copied  from 
no  one?  But  of  the  incessant  tradition  from  authority  to 
authority  and  yet  of  the  gradual  accumulation  of  new  matter 
from  personal  observation  and  experience  our  ensuing  sur- 
vey of  thirteen  centuries  of  thought  and  writing  will  afford 
more  detailed  illustration. 

*  Sir    Thomas    Heath,    Aristar-  the    fixed    stars    remain   unmoved 

chus     of     Samos,     the     Ancient  and  that  the  earth  revolves  round 

Copernicus:   a   history   of   Greek  the  sun  in  the  circumference  of  a 

astronomy     to     Aristarchus      to-  circle."      Such      evidence      seems 

gether  with  Aristarchus's  treatise,  scarcely  to  warrant   applying  the 

"On  the  Sizes  and  Distances  of  title  of  "The  Ancient  Copernicus" 

the  Sun  and  Moon,"  a  new  Greek  to      Aristarchus.        And      Heath 

text   with    translation   and   notes,  thinks  that  Schiaparelli  (/  precur- 

Oxford,    1913,    admits    that    "our  sori   di   Copernico   nell'   antichita, 

treatise  does  not  contain  any  sug-  and   other   papers)    went   too    far 

gestion  of  any  but  the  geocentric  in    ascribing    the    Copernican    hy- 

view    of    the    universe,     whereas  pothesis  to  Heraclides  of  Pontus. 

Archimedes  tells  us  that  Aristar-  On  Aristotle's  answer  to  Pythag- 

chus  wrote  a  book  of  hypotheses,  oreans  who  denied  the  geocentric 

one  of  which  was  that  the  sun  and  theory  see  Orr  (1913),  pp.  100-2. 


APPENDIX  I 

SOME    WORKS    ON    MAGIC,    RELIGION,    AND    ASTRONOMY    IN 
BABYLONIA  AND  ASSYRIA 

The  following  books  deal  expressly  with  the  magic  of 
Assyria  and  Babylonia : 

Fossey,  C.    La  magie  assyrienne;  etude  suivie  de  textes  magiques, 
Paris,  1902. 

King,  L.  W.     Babylonian  Magic  and  Sorcery,  being  "The  Prayers 
of  the  Lifting  of  the  Hand,"  London,  1896. 

Laurent,  A.     La  magie  et  la  divination  chez  les  Chaldeo-Assyr- 
iens,  Paris,  1894. 

Lenormant,   F,     Chaldean   Magic   and   Sorcery,   English   transla- 
tion, London,  1878. 

Schwab,  M.,  in  Proc.  Bibl.  Archaeology   (1890),  pp.  292-342,  on 
magic  bowls  from  Assyria  and  Babylonia. 

Tallquist,  K.  L.     Die  Assyrische  Beschworungsserie  Maqlu,  Leip- 
zig, 1895- 

Thompson,  R.  C.     The  Reports  of  the  Magicians  and  Astrologers 
of  Nineveh  and  Babylon  in  the  British  Museum,  London,  1900. 
Texts  and  translations — all  but  three  are  astrological. 
The  Devils  and  Evil  Spirits  of  Babylonia,  London,  1904. 
Semitic  Magic,  London,  1908. 

Weber,  O.     Damonenbeschworung  bei  den  Babyloniern  und  As- 
sy rern,  1906.    Eine  Skizze  (37  pp.),  in  Der  Alte  Orient. 

Zimmern.     Die  Beschwdrungstafeln  Surpu. 

Much  concerning  magic  will  also  be  found  in  works  on 
Babylonian  and  Assyrian  religion. 

Craig,  J.  A.     Assyrian  and  Babylonian  Religious  Texts,  Leipzig, 

1895-7. 
Curtiss,  S.  L     Primitive  Semitic  Religion  Today,  1902. 
Dhorme,   P.     Choix  des  textes   religieux   Assyriens   Babyloniens, 

1907. 

La  religion  Assyro-Babylonienne,  Paris,   1910. 
Gray,  C.  D.    The  Samas  Religious  Texts. 

33 


34  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

Jastrow,  Morris,    The  Religion  of  Babylonia  and  Assyria,  Boston, 

1898.     Revised  and  enlarged  as  Religion  Babyloniens  und  As- 

syriens,  Giessen,  1904. 
Jeremias.     Babylon.     Assyr.  Vorstellungen  von  dem  Leben  nach 

Tode,  Leipzig,  1887. 

Holle  und  Paradies,  and  other  w^orks. 
Knudtzon,  J.  A.     Assyrische  Gebete  an  den  Sonnengott,  Leipzig, 

1893. 
Lagrange,  M.  J.     £tudes  sur  les  religions  semitiques,  Paris,  1905. 
Langdon,  S,     Sumerian  and  Babylonian  Psalms,  Paris,  1909. 
Reisner,  G.  A.     Sumerisch-Babylonische  Hymnen,  Berlin,  1896. 
Robertson  Smith,  W.     Lectures  on  the  Religion  of  the  Semites, 

London,  1907. 
Roscher,  Lexicon,  for  various  articles. 
Zimmern.     Babylonische  Hymnen  und  Gebete  in  Auswahl,  32  pp., 

1905  (Der  Alte  Orient). 

Beitrage  zur  Kenntniss  der  Babyl.  Religion,  Leipzig,  1901. 

On  the  astronomy  and  astrology  of  the  Babylonians  one 
may  consult: 

Bezold,   C.     Astronomic,   Himmelschau   und   Astrallehre   bei   den 

Babyloniern.  (Sitzb.  Akad.  Heidelberg,  191 1,  Abh.  2). 
Boissier.   A.     Documents  assyriens   relatifs  aux  presages,   Paris, 

I 894- I 897. 

Choix   de  textes   relatifs   a   la   divination   assyro-babylonienne, 

Geneva,  1905-1906. 
Craig,  J.  A.     Astrological-Astronomical  Texts,  Leipzig,  1892. 
Cumont,    F.      Babylon    und    die   griechische    Astrologie.    (Neue 

Jahrb.  fiir  das  klass.  Altertum,  XXVH,  1911). 
Epping,  J.,  and  Strassmeier,  J.  N.     Astronomisches  aus  Babylon, 

1889. 
Ginzel,  F.  K.     Die  astronomischen  Kentnisse  der  Babylonier,  1901. 
Hehn,  J.     Siebenzahl   und   Sabbat  bei   den   Babyloniern  und   im 

Alten  Testament,  1907. 
Jensen,  P.     Kosmologie  der  Babylonier,  1890, 
Jeremias.     Das     Alter     der     babylonischen     Astronomic,     1908. 

Handbuch  der  altorientalischen  Geisteskultur,  1913. 
Kugler,  F.  X.     Die  Babylonische  Mondrechnung,  1900. 

Sternkunde  und  Sterndienst  in  Babel,  Freiburg,  1907-1913.    To 

be  completed  in  four  vols. 

Im  Bannkreis  Babels,  1910. 
Oppert,  J.     Die  astronomischen  Angaben  der  assyrischen  Keilin- 


APPENDIX  I  35 

schriften,  in  Sitzb.  d.  Wien.  Akad.  Math.-Nat.  Classe,  1885,  pp. 

894-906. 

Un  texte  Babylonien  astronomique  et  sa  traduction  grecque  par 

CI.  Ptolemee,  in  Zeitsch.  f.  Assyriol.  VI  (1891),  pp.  103-23. 

Sayce,  A.  H.  The  astronomy  and  astrology  of  the  Babylonians, 
with  translations  of  the  tablets  relating  to  the  subject,  in  Trans- 
actions of  the  Society  of  Biblical  Archaeology,  III  (1874),  145- 
339;  the  first  and  until  recently  the  best  guide  to  the  subject. 

Schiaparelli,  G.  V.     I  Primordi  ed  i  Progress!  dell'  Astronomia 
presso  i  Babilonesi,  Bologna,  1908. 
Astronomy  in  the  Old  Testament,  1905. 

Stiicken,  Astralmythen,  1896-1907. 

Virolleaud,  Ch.  L'Astrologie  chaldeenne,  Paris,  1905- ;  to  be 
completed  in  eight  parts,  texts  and  translations. 

Winckler,  Himmels-  und  Weltenbild  der  Babylonier  als  Grundlage 
der  Weltanschauung  und  Mythologie  aller  Volker,  in  Der  alte 
Orient,  III,  2-3. 


BOOK  I.     THE  ROMAN  EMPIRE 

Foreword. 

Chapter  2.     Pliny's  Natural  History. 

I.  Its  place  in  the  history  of  science. 

II.  Its  experimental  tendency. 

III.  Pliny's  account  of  magic. 

IV.  The  science  of  the  Magi. 

V.  Pliny's  magical  science. 

"       3.     Seneca  and  Ptolemy :  Natural  Divination  and 

Astrology. 
"       4.     Galen. 

I.  The  man  and  his  times. 

II.  His  medicine  and  experimental  science. 

III.  His  attitude  toward  magic. 

"       5.     Ancient  Applied  Science  and  Magic. 

"       6.     Plutarch's  Essays. 

"       7.     Apuleius  of  Madaura. 

"       8.     Philostratus's  Life  of  Apollonius  of  Tyana. 

"       9.     Literary     and     Philosophical     Attacks     upon 

Superstition. 
"     10.     The   Spurious   Mystic   Writings   of   Hermes, 

Orpheus,  and  Zoroaster. 
"     II.     Neo-Platonism  and  its  Relations  to  Astrology 

and  Theurgy. 
**     12.     Aelian,  Solinus,  and  Horapollo. 


37 


BOOK  I.     THE  ROMAN  EMPIRE 

FOREWORD 

A  TRIO  of  great  names,  Pliny,  Galen,  and  Ptolemy,  stand  out  A  trio  of 
above  all  others  in  the  history  of  science  under  the  Roman  names. 
Empire.  In  the  use  or  criticism  which  they  make  of  earlier 
writers  and  investigators  they  are  also  our  chief  sources  for 
the  science  of  the  preceding  Hellenistic  period.  By  their 
voluminousness,  their  generous  scope  in  ground  covered,  and 
their  broad,  liberal,  personal  outlooks,  they  have  painted,  in 
colors  for  the  most  part  imperishable,  extensive  canvasses 
of  the  scientific  spirit  and  acquisitions  of  their  own  time. 
Pliny  pursued  politics  and  literature  as  well  as  natural  sci- 
ence; Ptolemy  was  at  once  mathematician,  astronomer, 
physicist,  and  geographer;  Galen  knew  philosophy  as  well 
as  medicine.  The  two  latter  men,  moreover,  made  original 
contributions  of  their  own  of  the  very  first  order  to  scientific 
knowledge  and  method.  It  is  characteristic  of  the  homo- 
geneous and  widespread  culture  of  the  Roman  Empire  that 
these  three  representatives  of  different,  although  overlap- 
ping, fields  of  science  were  natives  of  the  three  continents 
that  enclose  the  Mediterranean  Sea.  Pliny  was  bom  at  Como 
where  Italy  verges  on  transalpine  lands ;  Ptolemy,  born  some- 
where in  Egypt,  did  his  work  at  Alexandria;  Galen  came 
from  Pergamum  in  Asia  Minor.  Finally,  these  men  were, 
after  Aristotle,  the  three  ancient  scientists  who  directly  or 
indirectly  most  powerfully  influenced  the  middle  ages.  Thus 
they  illuminate  past,  present,  and  future. 

We  shall  therefore  open  the  present  section  of  our  in-   plan  of 
vestigation  by  considering  in  turn  chronologically,   Pliny, 
Ptolemy,  and  Galen,  coupling,  however,  with  our  considera- 
tion of  Ptolemy  the  work  of  Seneca  on  Natural  Questions 

39 


this 
section. 


40  FOREWORD 

which  shows  the  same  combination  of  natural  science  and 
natural  divination.  Next  we  shall  consider  some  representa- 
tives of  ancient  applied  science  and  its  relations  to  magic,  and 
the  more  miscellaneous  writings  of  Plutarch,  Apuleius,  and 
Philostratus's  Life  of  Apollonius  of  Tyana.  From  the  hos- 
pitable attitude  toward  magic  and  occult  science  displayed  by 
these  last  writers  we  sha''  then  turn  back  again  to  consider 
some  examples  of  literary  and  philosophical  attacks  upon 
superstition,  before  proceeding  lastly  to  spurious  mystic 
writings  of  the  Roman  Empire,  Neo-Platonism  and  its  re- 
lations to  astrology  and  theurgy,  and  the  works  of  Aelian, 
Solinus,  and  Horapollo. 


CHAPTER  II 

pliny's  natural  history 

I,     Its  Place  in  the  History  of  Science 

Its  importance  in  our  investigation — As  a  collection  of  miscellaneous 
information — As  a  repository  of  ancient  natural  science — As  a  source 
for  magic — Pliny's  career — His  writings — His  own  description  of  the 
Natural  History — His  devotion  to  science — Conflict  of  science  and 
religion — Pliny  not  a  trained  naturalist — His  use  of  authorities — His 
lack  of  arrangement  and  classification — His  scepticism  and  credulity 
— A  guide  to  ancient  science — His  medieval  influence — Early  printed 
editions. 

II.  Its  Experimental  Tendency 

Importance  of  observation  and  experience — Use  of  the  word  experi- 
mentum — Experiments  due  to  scientific  curiosity — Medical  experimenta- 
tion— Chance  experience  and  divine  revelation — Marvels  proved  by 
experience. 

III.  Pliny's  Account  of  Magic 

Oriental  origin  of  magic — Its  spread  to  the  Greeks — Its  spread  out- 
side the  Graeco-Roman  world — Failure  to  understand  its  true  origin — 
Magic  and  divination — Magic  and  religion — Magic  and  medicine — Magic 
and  philosophy — Falseness  of  magic — Crimes  of  magic — Pliny's  censure 
of  magic  is  mainly  intellectual — Vagueness  of  Pliny's  scepticism — Magic 
and  science  indistinguishable. 

IV.     The  Sf-ience  of  the  Magi 

Magicians  as  investigators  of  nature — The  Magi  on  herbs — Marvel- 
ous virtues  of  herbs — Animals  and  parts  of  animals — Further  instances 
— Magic  rites  with  animals  and  parts  of  animals — Marvels  wrought 
with  parts  of  animals — The  Magi  on  stones — Other  magical  recipe* 
— Summary  of  the  statements  of  the  Magi. 

V.     Pliny's  Magical  Science 

From  the  Magi  to  Pliny's  magic — Habits  of  animals — Remedies  dis- 
covered by  animals — Jealousy  of  animals — Occult  virtues  of  animals — 
The  virtues  of  herbs— Plucking  herbs — Agricultural  magic— Virtue  of 
stones — Other  minerals  and  metals — Virtues  of  human  parts— Virtues 

41 


42 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


of  human  saliva— The  human  operator— Absence  of  medical  compounds 
— Sympathetic  magic — Antipathies  between  animals — Love  and  hatred 
between  inanimate  objects — Sympathy  between  animate  and  inanimate 
objects— Like  cures  like— The  principle  of  association — Magic  transfer 
of  disease— Amulets— Position  or  direction— The  time  element— Ob- 
servance of  number — Relation  between  operator  and  patient — Incanta- 
tions— Attitude  towards  love-charms  and  birth  control — Pliny  and 
astrology — Celestial  portents — The  stars  and  the  world  of  nature — 
Astrological  medicine — Conclusion :  magic  unity  of  Pliny's  superstitions. 

''Salve,    parens   rerum    omnium   Natura,    teque   nobis 
Quiritium  solis  celehratam  esse  numeris  omnibus  tuis  fave!" 
— Closing  words  of  the  Natural  History} 

I.     Its  Place  in  the  History  of  Science 

We  should  have  to  search  long  before  finding  a  better  start- 
ing-point for  the  consideration  of  the  union  of  magic  with 
the  science  of  the  Roman  Empire,  and  of  the  way  in  which 
that  union  influenced  the  middle  ages,  than  Pliny's  Natural 
History}  The  foregoing  sentence,  with  which  years  ago 
I  opened  a  chapter  on  the  Natural  History  of  Pliny  the 
Elder  in  my  briefer  preliminary  study  of  magic  in  the  intel- 
lectual history  of  the  Roman  Empire,  seems  as  true  as 
ever;  and  although  I  there  considered  his  confusion  of  magic 
and  science  at  some  length,  I  do  not  see  how  I  can  make  the 
present  work  well-rounded  and  complete  without  including 
in  it  a  yet  more  detailed  analysis  of  the  contents  of  Pliny's 
book. 

Pliny's  Natural  History,  which  appeared  about  yy  A.  D. 
and  is  dedicated  to  the  Emperor  Titus,  is  perhaps  the  most 

which  is  superior  to  both  the  Ger- 
man editions  in  its  explanatory 
notes  and  subject  index,  and  which 
also  apparently  antedates  them 
in  some  readings  suggested  for 
doubtful  passages  in  the  text. 
Three  modes  of  dividing  the 
Natural  History  into  chapters  are 
indicated  in  the  editions  of  Janus 
and  Detlefsen.  I  shall  employ 
that  found  in  the  earlier  editions 
of  Hardouin,  Valpy,  Lemaire,  and 
Ajasson,  and  preferred  in  the 
English  translation  of  Bostock 
and  Riley. 


*  "Farewell,  Nature,  parent  of 
all  things,  and  in  thy  manifold 
multiplicity  bless  me  who,  alone 
of  the  Romans,  has  sung  thy 
praise." 

'  For  the  Latin  text  of  the 
Naturalis  Historia  I  have  used  the 
editions  of  D.  Detlefsen,  Berlin, 
1866-1882,  and  L.  Janus,  Leipzig, 
1870,  6  vols,  in  3 ;  5  vols,  in  3. 
There  is,  however,  a  good  English 
translation  of  the  Natural  History, 
with  an  introductory  essay,  by 
J.  Bostock  and  H.  T.  Riley,  Lon- 
don, 1855,  6  vols.  (Bohn  Library), 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  43 

important  single  source  extant  for  the  history  of  ancient 
civilization.  Its  thirty-seven  books,  written  in  a  very  com- 
pact style,  constitute  a  vast  collection  of  the  most  miscel- 
laneous information.  Whether  one  is  investigating  ancient 
painting,  sculpture,  and  other  fine  arts ;  or  the  geography  of 
the  Roman  Empire;  or  Roman  triumphs,  gladiatorial  con- 
tests, and  theatrical  exhibitions;  or  the  industrial  processes 
of  antiquity;  or  Mediterranean  trade;  or  Italian  agriculture; 
or  mining  in  ancient  Spain;  or  the  history  of  Roman  coin- 
age; or  the  fluctuation  of  prices  in  antiquity;  or  the  Roman 
attitude  towards  usury;  or  the  pagan  attitude  towards  im- 
mortality ;  or  the  nature  of  ancient  beverages ;  or  the  relig- 
ious usages  of  the  ancient  Romans ;  or  any  of  a  number  of 
other  topics ;  one  will  find  something  concerning  all  of  them 
in  Pliny,  He  is  apt  both  to  depict  such  conditions  in  his 
own  time  and  to  trace  them  back  to  their  origins.  Further- 
more he  repeats  many  detailed  incidents  of  interest  to  the 
political  or  narrative  historian  of  Rome  as  well  as  to  the 
student  of  the  economic,  social,  artistic,  and  religious  life  of 
antiquity.  Probably  there  is  no  place  where  an  isolated  point 
is  more  likely  to  be  run  down  by  the  investigator,  and  it  is 
regrettable  that  exhaustive  analytical  indices  of  the  work 
are  not  available.  We  may  add  that,  although  the  work  is 
supposedly  a  collection  of  facts,  Pliny  contrives  to  introduce 
many  moral  reflections  and  sharp  comments  on  the  luxury, 
vice,  and  unintellectual  character  of  his  times,  suggesting 
Juvenal's  picture  of  degenerate  Roman  society  and  his  own 
lofty  moral  standards. 

Indeed,  Pliny's  title,  Naturalis  Historia,  or  at  least  the   ^g  ^ 
common  English  translation  of  it,  "Natural  History,"  has   repository 

,  .  .   .       ,  ,.      .      ,  .  ,    ,  1,1  of  ancient 

been  criticized  as  too  limited  m  scope,  and  the  work  has  been  natural 
described  as  "rather  a  vast  encyclopedia  of  ancient  knowl-  science. 
edge  and  belief  upon  almost  every  known  subject."  ^ 
Pliny  himself  mentions  in  his  preface  the  Greek  word 
"encyclopedia"  as  indicative  of  his  scope.  Nevertheless,  his 
work  is  primarily  an  account  of  nature  rather  than  of  civili- 
*Bostock  and   Riley    (1855),  I,  xvi. 


44  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

zation,  and  much  of  its  information  concerning  such  mat- 
ters as  the  arts  and  business  is  incidental.  Most  of  its  books 
bear  such  titles  as  Aquatic  Animals,  Exotic  Trees,  Medi- 
cines from  Forest  Trees,  The  Natures  of  Metals.  After  an 
introductory  book  containing  the  preface  and  a  table  of  con- 
tents and  lists  of  authorities  for  each  of  the  subsequent 
books,  the  second  book  treats  of  the  universe,  heavenly 
bodies,  meteorology,  and  the  chief  changes,  such  as  earth- 
quakes and  tides,  in  the  land  and  water  forming  the  earth's 
surface.  After  four  books  devoted  to  geography,  the  sev- 
enth deals  with  man  and  human  inventions.  Four  more  fol- 
low on  terrestrial  and  aquatic  animals,  birds,  and  insects. 
Sixteen  more  are  concerned  with  plants,  trees,  vines,  and 
other  vegetation,  and  the  medicinal  simples  derived  from 
them.  Five  books  discuss  the  medicinal  simples  derived 
from  animals,  including  the  human  body;  and  the  last  five 
books  treat  of  metals  and  minerals  and  the  arts  in  which 
they  are  employed.  It  is  thus  evident  that  in  the  main  Pliny 
is  concerned  with  natural  science,  and  that,  if  his  work  is  a 
mine  of  miscellaneous  historical  information,  it  should  even 
more  prove  a  rich  treasure-house — "quoniam,  ut  ait  Do- 
mitius  Piso,  thesauros  oportet  esse  non  libros"  ^ — for  an  in- 
vestigation concerned  as  intimately  as  is  ours  with  the  his- 
tory of  science. 

The  Natural  History  is  a  great  storehouse  of  misinfor- 
mation as  well  as  of  information,  for  Pliny's  credulity  and 
lack  of  discrimination  harvested  the  tares  of  legend  and 
magic  along  with  the  wheat  of  historical  fact  and  ancient 
science  in  his  voluminous  granary.  This  may  put  other  his- 
torical investigators  upon  their  guard  in  accepting  its  state- 
ments, but  only  increases  its  value  for  our  purpose.  Per- 
haps it  is  even  more  valuable  as  a  collection  of  ancient  er- 
rors than  it  is  as  a  repository  of  ancient  science.  It  touches 
upon  many  of  the  varieties,  and  illustrates  most  of  the  char- 
acteristics, of  magic.  Moreover,  Pliny  often  mentions  the 
Magi  or  magicians  and  discusses  "magic"  expressly  at  some 

*NH.  Preface. 


11  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  45 

length  in  the  opening  chapters  of  his  thirtieth  book — one  of 
the  most  important  passages  on  the  theme  in  any  ancient 
writer. 

PHny  the  Elder,  as  we  learn  from  his  own  statements  in  Piin/s 
the  Natural  History  and  from  one  or  two  letters  concerning  ^^^^c"*- 
him  written  by  his  nephew,  Pliny  the  Younger,  whom  he 
adopted,  went  through  the  usual  military,  forensic,  and  offi- 
cial career  of  the  Roman  of  good  family,  and  spent  his  life 
largely  in  the  service  of  the  emperors.  He  visited  vari- 
ous Mediterranean  lands,  such  as  Spain,  Africa,  Greece,  and 
Egypt,  and  fought  in  Germany.  He  was  in  charge  of 
the  Roman  fleet  on  the  west  coast  of  Italy  when  he  met  his 
death  at  the  age  of  fifty-six  by  suffocation  as  he  was  trying 
to  rescue  others  from  the  fumes  and  vapors  from  the  erup- 
tion of  Mount  Vesuvius. 

Of  Pliny's  writings  the  Natural  History  is  alone  extant.  His 
but  other  titles  have  been  preserved  which  serve  to  show  his  writings, 
great  literary  industry  and  the  extent  of  his  interests.  He 
wrote  on  the  use  of  the  javelin  by  cavalry,  a  life  of  his 
friend  Pomponius,  an  account  in  twenty  books  of  all  the 
wars  waged  by  the  Romans  in  Germany,  a  rather  long  work 
on  oratory  called  The  Student,  a  grammatical  or  philo- 
logical work  in  eight  books  entitled  De  dubio  sermone,  and 
a  continuation  of  the  History  of  Aufidius  Bassus  in  thirty- 
one  books.  Yet  in  the  dedication  of  the  Natural  History  to 
the  emperor  Titus  he  states  that  his  days  were  taken  up  with 
official  business  and  only  his  nights  were  free  for  literary 
labor.  This  statement  is  supported  by  a  letter  of  his  nephew 
telling  how  he  used  to  study  by  candle-light  both  late  at 
night  and  before  daybreak.  Pliny  the  Younger  narrates  sev- 
eral incidents  to  illustrate  how  jealous  and  economical  of 
every  spare  moment  his  uncle  was.  He  would  dictate  or 
have  books  read  to  him  while  lying  down  or  in  the  bath,  and 
on  journeys  a  secretary  was  always  by  his  side  with  books 
and  tablets.  If  the  weather  was  very  cold,  the  amanuensis 
wore  gloves  so  that  his  hands  might  not  become  too  numb 
to  write.     Pliny  always  took  notes  on  what  he  read,  and  at 


46 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


History. 


his  death  left  his  nephew  one  hundred  and  sixty  notebooks 
written  in  a  small  hand  on  both  sides. 
His  own  Such  were  the  conditions  under  which,  and  the  methods 

description  ^y  which,  Pliny  compiled  his  encyclopedia  on  nature.  No 
Natural  single  writer  either  Greek  or  Latin,  he  tells  us,  had  ever  be- 
fore attempted  so  extensive  a  task.  He  adds  that  he  treats 
of  some  twenty  thousand  topics  gleaned  from  the  perusal  of 
about  two  thousand  volumes  by  one  hundred  authors.^ 
Judging  from  his  bibliographies  and  citations,  however,  he 
would  seem  to  have  utilized  more  than  one  hundred  au- 
thors. But  possibly  he  had  not  read  all  the  writers  men- 
tioned in  his  bibliographies.  He  affirms  that  previous  stu- 
dents have  had  access  to  but  few  of  the  volumes  which  he 
has  used,  and  that  he  adds  many  things  unknown  to  his 
ancient  authorities  and  recently  discovered.  Occasionally 
he  shows  an  acquaintance  with  beliefs  and  practices  of  the 
Gauls  and  Druids.  Thus  his  work  assumes  to  be  something 
more  tlian  a  compilation  from  other  books.  He  says,  how- 
ever, that  no  doubt  he  has  omitted  much,  since  he  is  only 
human  and  has  had  many  other  demands  upon  his  time.  He 
admits  that  his  subject  is  dry  (sterilis  materia)  and  does  not 
lend  itself  to  literary  exhibitions,  nor  include  matters  stimu- 
lating to  write  about  and  pleasant  to  read  about,  like 
speeches  and  marvelous  occurrences  and  varied  incidents. 
Nor  does  it  permit  purity  and  elegance  of  diction,  since  one 
must  at  times  employ  the  terminology  of  rustics,  foreigners, 
and  even  barbarians.  Furthermore,  "it  is  an  arduous  task 
to  give  novelty  to  what  is  ancient,  authority  to  what  is  new, 
interest  to  what  is  obsolete,  light  to  what  is  obscure,  charm 
to  what  is  loathsome" — as  many  of  his  medicinal  simples 
undoubtedly  are — "credit  to  what  is  dubious." 

It  is  a  great  comfort  to  Pliny,  however,  in  his  immense 
task,  when  many  laugh  at  him  as  wasting  his  time  over 
worthless  trifles,  to  reflect  that  he  is  being  spurned  along 
with  Nature.^     In  another  passage  ^  he  contrasts  the  blood 


His  devo 
tion  to 
science. 


NH,  Preface. 

NH,  xxn,  7. 


NH,  n,  6. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  47 

and  slaug'hter  of  military  history  with  the  benefits  bestowed 
upon  mankind  by  astronomers.  In  a  third  passage  ^  he 
looks  back  regretfully  at  the  widespread  interest  in  science 
among  the  Greeks,  although  those  were  times  of  political 
disunion  and  strife  and  although  communication  between 
different  lands  was  interrupted  by  piracy  as  well  as  war, 
whereas  now,  with  the  whole  empire  at  peace,  not  only  is 
no  new  scientific  inquiry  undertaken,  but  men  do  not  even 
thoroughly  study  the  works  of  the  ancients,  and  are  intent 
on  the  acquisition  of  lucre  rather  than  learning.  These  and 
other  passages  which  might  be  cited  attest  Pliny's  devotion 
to  science. 

In  Pliny  we  also  detect  signs  of  the  conflict  between  Conflict. 
science  and  religion.  In  a  single  chapter  on  God  he  says  ^"^^ 
pretty  much  all  that  the  church  fathers  later  repeated  at  religion, 
much  greater  length  against  paganism  and  polytheism.  But 
his  discussion  would  hardly  satisfy  a  Christian.  He  asserts 
that  "it  is  God  for  man  to  aid  his  fellow  man,-  and  this  is 
the  path  to  eternal  glory,"  but  he  turns  this  noble  sentiment 
to  justify  deification  of  the  emperors  who  have  done  so  much 
for  mankind.  He  questions  whether  God  is  concerned  with 
human  affairs;  slyly  suggests  that  if  so,  God  must  be  too 
busy  to  punish  all  crimes  promptly;  and  points  out  that 
there  are  some  things  which  God  cannot  do.  He  cannot 
commit  suicide  as  men  can,  nor  alter  past  events,  nor  make 
twice  ten  anything  else  than  twenty.  Pliny  then  concludes : 
"By  which  is  revealed  in  no  uncertain  wise  the  power  of 
Nature,  and  that  is  what  we  call  God."  In  many  other  pas- 
sages he  exclaims  at  Nature's  benignity  or  providence.  He 
believed  that  the  soul  had  no  separate  existence  from  the 
body,  ^  and  that  after  death  there  was  no  more  sense  left  in 
body  or  soul  than  was  there  before  birth.  The  hope  of  per- 
sonal immortality  he  scorned  as  "puerile  ravings"  produced 
by  the  fear  of  death,  and  he  believed  still  less  in  the  possibility 
of  any  resurrection  of  the  body.    In  short,  natural  law,  me- 

NH,  II,  46.  iuvare   mortalem.  .  ,  ." 

'NH,  II,  5.     "Deus  est  mortali         '  NH,  VII,  56. 


48  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

chanical  force,  and  facts  capable  of  scientific  investigation 
would  seem  to  be  all  that  he  will  admit  and  to  suffice  to 
satisfy  his  strong  intellect.  Yet  we  shall  later  find  him  hav- 
ing the  greatest  difficulty  in  distinguishing  between  science 
and  magic,  and  giving  credence  to  many  details  in  science 
which  seem  to  us  quite  as  superstitious  as  the  pagan  beliefs 
concerning  the  gods  which  he  rejected.  But  if  any  reader 
is  inclined  to  belittle  Pliny  for  this,  let  him  first  stop  and 
think  how  Pliny  would  ridicule  some  modern  scientists  for 
their  religious  beliefs,  or  for  their  spiritualism  or  psychic  re- 
search. 
Pliny  not  It  is  desirable,  however,  to  form  some  estimate  of  Pliny's 

naturalfst.  fitness  for  his  task  in  order  to  judge  how  accurate  a  picture 
of  ancient  science  his  work  is.  He  does  not  seem  to  have 
had  much  detailed  training  or  experience  in  the  natural  sci- 
ences himself.  He  writes  not  as  a  naturalist  who  has  ob- 
served widely  and  profoundly  the  phenomena  and  opera- 
tions of  nature,  but  as  an  omnivorous  reader  and  volumin- 
ous note-taker  who  owes  his  knowledge  largely  to  books  or 
hearsay,  although  occasionally  he  says  "I  know"  instead  of 
**they  say,"  or  gives  the  results  of  his  own  observation  and 
experience.  In  the  main  he  is  not  a  scientist  himself  but 
only  a  historian  of  science  or  nature;  after  all,  his  title, 
Natural  History,  is  a  very  fitting  one.  The  question,  of 
course,  arises  whether  he  has  sufficient  scientific  training  to 
evaluate  properly  the  work  of  the  past.  Has  he  read  the 
best  authors,  has  he  noted  their  best  passages,  has  he  under- 
stood their  meaning?  Does  he  repeat  inferior  theories  and 
omit  the  correcter  views  of  certain  Alexandrian  scientists? 
These  questions  are  hard  to  answer.  On  his  behalf  it  may 
be  said  that  he  deals  little  with  abstruse  scientific  theory  and 
mainly  with  simple  substances  and  geographical  places,  mat- 
ters in  which  it  seems  difficult  for  him  to  go  far  astray. 
Scientific  specialists  were  not  numerous  in  those  days,  any- 
way, and  science  had  not  yet  so  far  advanced  and  ramified 
that  one  man  might  not  hope  to  cover  the  entire  field  and 
do  it  substantial  justice.     Pliny  the  Younger  was  perhaps 


II 


PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  49 


authori- 
ties. 


a  partial  judge,  but  he  described  the  Natural  History  as  "a 
work  remarkable  for  its  comprehensiveness  and  erudition, 
and  not  less  varied  than  Nature  herself."  ^ 

One  thing  in  Pliny's  favor  as  a  compiler,  besides  his  per-  His  use  of 
sonal  industry,  unflagging  interest,  and  apparently  abundant 
supply  of  clerical  assistance,  is  his  full  and  honest  statement 
of  his  authorities,  although  he  adds  that  he  has  caught  many 
authors  transcribing  others  verbatim  v^ithout  acknowledg- 
ment. He  has,  however,  great  admiration  for  many  of  his 
authorities,  exclaiming  more  than  once  at  the  care  and  dili- 
gence of  the  men  of  the  past  who  have  left  nothing  untried 
or  unexperienced,  from  trackless  mountain  tops  to  the  roots 
of  herbs.^  Sometimes,  nevertheless,  he  disputes  their  as- 
sertions. For  instance,  Hippocrates  said  that  the  appear- 
ance of  jaundice  on  the  seventh  day  in  fever  is  a  fatal  sign, 
"but  we  know  some  who  have  lived  even  after  this."  ^  Pliny 
also  scolds  Sophocles  for  his  falsehoods  concerning  amber.* 
It  may  seem  surprising  that  he  should  expect  strict  scientific 
truth  from  a  dramatic  poet,  but  Pliny,  like  many  medieval 
writers,  seems  to  regard  poets  as  good  scientific  authorities. 
In  another  passage  he  accepts  Sophocles'  statement  that  a 
certain  plant  is  poisonous,  rather  than  the  contrary  view  of 
other  writers,  saying  "the  authority  of  so  prominent  a  man 
moves  me  against  their  opinions."  ^  He  also  cites  Menander 
concerning  fish  and,  like  almost  all  the  ancients,  regards 
Homer  as  an  authority  on  all  matters.^  Pliny  sometimes 
cites  the  works  of  King  Juba  of  Numidia,  than  whom  there 
hardly  seems  to  have  been  a  greater  liar  in  antiquity.'^  He 
stated  among  other  things  in  a  work  which  he  wrote  for 
Gains  Caesar,  the  son  of  Augustus,  that  a  whale  six  hun- 
dred feet  long  and  three  hundred  and  sixty  feet  broad  had 

♦Letter  to  Macer,  Ep.  Ill,  5,  ed.  ''Yet  C.  W.  King,  Natural  His- 

Keil.  Leipzig,  1896.  tory  of  Precious  Stones,  p.  2,  de- 

'NH,  Vn,  i;  XXIII,  60;  XXV,      plores  the  loss  of  Juba's  treatise, 

I ;  XXVII,   I.  which    he    says,    "considering    his 

*XXVI,  76.  position     and     opportunities     for 

*XXXVlI,    II.  exact  information,  is  perhaps  the 

•XXI,  88.  greatest    we    have    to    deplore    in 

•XXXII,  24.  this  sad  catalogue  of  desiderata." 


so 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


His 

lack  of 
arrange- 
ment and 
classifica- 
tion. 


His 

scepticism 
and 
credulity. 


entered  a  river  in  Arabia.^  But  where  should  Pliny  turn 
for  sober  truth  ?  The  Stoic  Chrysippus  prated  of  amulets ;  ^ 
treatises  ascribed  to  the  great  philosophers  Democritus  and 
Pythagoras  ^  were  full  of  magic;  and  in  the  works  of  Cicero 
he  read  of  a  man  who  could  see  for  a  distance  of  one  hun- 
dred and  thirty-five  miles,  and  in  Varro  that  this  man,  stand- 
ing on  a  Sicilian  promontory,  could  count  the  number  of 
ships  sailing  out  of  the  harbor  of  Carthage.* 

The  Natural  History  has  been  criticized  as  poorly  ar- 
ranged and  lacking  in  scientific  classification,  but  this  is  a 
criticism  which  can  be  made  of  many  works  of  the  classi- 
cal period.  Their  presentation  is  apt  to  be  rambling  and 
discursive  rather  than  logical  and  systematic.  Even  Aris- 
totle's History  of  Animals  is  described  by  Lewes  ^  as  un- 
classified in  its  arrangement  and  careless  in  its  selection  of 
material.  I  have  often  thought  that  the  scholastic  centuries 
did  mankind  at  least  one  service,  that  of  teaching  lecturers 
and  writers  how  to  arrange  their  material.  Pliny  seems 
rather  in  advance  of  his  times  in  supplying  full  tables  of 
contents  for  the  busy  emperor's  convenience.  Valerius  So- 
ranus  seems  to  have  been  the  only  previous  Roman  writer  to 
do  this.  One  indication  of  haste  in  composition  and  failure 
to  sift  and  compare  his  material  is  the  fact  that  Pliny  some- 
times makes  or  includes  contradictory  statements,  probably 
taken  from  different  authorities.  On  the  other  hand,  he  not 
infrequently  alludes  to  previous  passages  in  his  own  work, 
thus  showing  that  he  has  his  material  fairly  well  in  hand. 

Pliny  once  said  that  there  was  no  book  so  bad  but  what 
some  good  might  be  got  from  it,®  and  to  the  modern  reader 
he  seems  almost  incredibly  credulous  and  indiscriminate  in 


*NH.  xxxn,  4. 

*XXX,  30. 

'  Bouche-Leclercq  (1899),  p. 
519,  notes,  however,  that  Aulus 
Gellius  (X,  12)  protested  against 
Pliny's  credulity  in  accepting  such 
works  as  genuine  and  that  "Colu- 
melle  (VH,  5)  cite  un  certain 
Bolus  de  Mendes  comme  I'auteur 
des    vTOfiinifjLaTa  attribucs  a  Dcmoc- 


rite."  Bouche-Leclercq  adds,  how- 
ever, "Rien  n'y  fit:  Democrite 
devint  le  grand  docteur  de  Ut 
magie." 

'NH,  vn,  21. 

'G.  H.  Lewes,  Aristotle;  a 
Chapter  from  the  History  of 
Science,  London.  1864. 

*  Letters  of  Pliny  the  Younger, 
in,  5,  ed.  Keil,  Leipzig,  1896. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  51 

his  selection  of  material,  and  to  lack  any  standard  of  judg- 
ment between  the  true  and  the  false.  Yet  he  often  assumes 
an  air  of  scepticism  and  censures  others  sharply  for  their 
credulity  or  exaggeration.  "  'Tis  strange,"  he  remarks 
a  propos  of  some  tales  of  men  transformed  into  wolves  for 
nine  or  ten  years,  "how  far  Greek  credulity  has  gone.  No 
lie  is  so  impudent  that  it  lacks  a  voucher."  ^  Once  he  ex- 
presses his  determination  to  include  only  those  points  on 
which  his  authorities  are  in  agreement.^ 

On  the  whole,  while  to  us  to-day  the  Natural  History  a  guide  tc 
seems  a  disorderly  and  indiscriminate  conglomeration  of  ^"j^^^"g 
fact  and  fiction,  its  defects  are  probably  to  a  great  extent 
those  of  its  age  and  of  the  writers  from  whom  it  has  bor- 
rowed. If  it  does  not  reflect  the  highest  achievements  and 
clearest  thinking  of  the  best  scientists  of  antiquity — and  be 
it  said  that  there  are  a  number  of  the  Hellenistic  age  of 
whom  we  should  know  less  than  we  do  but  for  Pliny — it 
probably  is  a  fairly  faithful  epitome  of  science  and  error 
concerning  nature  in  his  own  time  and  the  centuries  pre- 
ceding. At  any  rate  it  is  the  best  portrayal  that  has  reached 
us.  From  it  we  can  get  our  background  of  the  confusion 
of  magic  and  science  in  the  Hellenistic  age,  and  then  reveal 
against  this  setting  the  development  of  them  both  in  the 
course  of  the  Roman  Empire  and  middle  ages.  Pliny  gives 
so  many  items  upon  each  point,  and  is  so  much  fuller  than 
the  average  ancient  or  medieval  book  of  science,  that  he 
serves  as  a  reference  book,  being  the  likeliest  place  to  look 
to  find  duplicated  some  statement  concerning  nature  by  a 
later  writer.  This  of  course  shows  that  such  a  statement 
did  not  originate  with  the  later  writer,  but  is  not  a  sure  sign 
that  he  copied  from  Pliny ;  they  may  both  have  used  the  same 
authorities,  as  seems  the  case  with  Greek  authors  later  in  the 
empire  who  probably  did  not  know  of  Pliny's  work. 

In  the  middle  ages,  however,  Pliny  had  an  undoubted    His 
direct  influence.^     Manuscripts  of  the  Natural  History  are   h^fluence. 

*NH,  VIII,  34.  des    Plinius    im     Mittelalter,    in 

*  XXVIII,   I.  ^        Sitsh.  Bayer.  Akad.  Philos-Philol. 

*Ruck.  Die  Naturalis  Historia      Classe    (1908)    pp.  203-318.     For 


52 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


numerous,  although  in  a  scarcely  legible  condition  owing  to 
corrections  and  emendations  which  enhance  the  obscurity  of 
the  text  and  perhaps  do  Pliny  grave  injustice  in  other  re- 
spects.^ Also  many  manuscripts  contain  only  a  few  books 
or  fragments  of  the  text,  so  that  it  is  possible  that  many 
medieval  scholars  knew  their  Pliny  only  in  part.^  This, 
however,  can  scarcely  be  argued  from  their  failure  to  in- 
clude more  from  him  in  their  own  works;  for  that  might 
be  due  to  their  knowing  the  Natural  History  so  well  that 
they  took  its  contents  for  granted  and  tried  to  include  other 
material  in  their  own  works.  In  a  later  chapter  we  shall  treat 
of  The  Medicine  of  Pliny,  a  treatise  derived  from  the  Nat- 
ural History.  Pliny's  phrase  rerum  natura  figures  as  the 
title  of  several  medieval  encyclopedias  of  somewhat  similar 
scope.  And  his  own  name  was  too  well  known  in  the  middle 
ages  to  escape  having  a  work  on  the  philosopher's  stone 
ascribed  to  him.^ 


citations  of  Pliny  by  writers  of 
the  late  Roman  empire  and  early 
middle  ages,  see  Panckoucke, 
Bibliotheque  Latin e -Frang aise ,  vol. 
CVI. 

^Concerning  the  MSS  see  Det- 
lefsen's  prefaces  in  each  of  his 
first  five  volumes  and  his  fuller 
dissertations  in  Jahn's  Neue  Jahrb., 
77,  653ff,  Rhein.  Mus.,  XV,  265ff; 
XVIII,  227ff,  327. 

Detlefsen  seems  to  have  made 
no  use  of  English  MSS,  but  a 
folio  of  the  close  of  the  12th  cen- 
tury at  New  College,  Oxford, 
contains  the  first  nineteen  books 
of  the  Natural  History  and  is 
described  by  Coxe  as  "very  well 
written   and   preserved." 

Nor  does  Detlefsen  mention  Le 
Mans  263,  I2th  century,  containing 
all  37  books  except  that  the  last 
book  is  incomplete,  and  with  a  full 
page  miniature  (fol.  lov)  show- 
ing Pliny  in  the  act  of  presenting 
his  work  to  Vespasian.  Escorial 
Q-I-4  and  R-I-5  are  two  other 
practically  complete  texts  of  the 
fourteenth  century  which  Detlef- 
sen failed  to  use. 

'See  M.  R.  James,  Eton  Manu- 
scripts, p.  63,   MS   134,  Bl.  4.  7., 


Roberti  Crikeladensis  Prioris  Ox- 
oniensis  excerpta  ex  Plinii  His- 
toria  Naturali,  12- 13th  century, 
in  a  large  English  hand,  giving 
extracts  extending  from  Book  II 
to  Book  IX. 

Of  Balliol  124,  fols.  1-138,  Cos- 
mographia  mundi,  by  John  Free, 
born  at  Bristol  or  London,  fellow 
at  Balliol  College,  Oxford,  later 
professor  of  medicine  at  Padua 
and  a  doctor  at  Rome,  also  well 
instructed  in  civil  law  and  Greek, 
Coxe  writes,  "This  work  is  noth- 
ing but  a  series  of  excerpts  from 
Pliny's  Natural  History,  beginning 
with  the  second  and  leaving  off 
with  the  twentieth."  I  wonder  if 
John  Free  may  not  have  used  the 
very  MS  of  the  first  nineteen 
books  mentioned  in  the  foregoing 
note,  since  the  second  book  of  the 
Natural  History  is  often  reckoned 
as  the  first. 

In  Balliol  146A,  15th  century, 
fol.  3-,  the  Natural  History  ap- 
pears in  epitome,  with  a  prologue 
opening,  "I,  Reginald  (Retinal- 
dus),  servant  of  Christ,  perusing 
the  books  of  Pliny  .  .  ." 

*  Bologna,  952,  15th  century, 
fols.  157-60,  "Tractatus  optimus  in 


IX  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  S3 

That  the  Natural  History  was  well  known  as  a  whole  at  Early 
least  by  the  close  of  the  middle  ages  is  shown  by  the  numer-  ^^|"^q^^ 
ous  editions,  some  of  them  magnificently  printed,  which 
were  turned  off  from  the  Italian  presses  immediately  after 
the  invention  of  printing.  In  the  Magliabechian  Library 
of  Florence  alone  are  editions  printed  at  Venice  in  1469  and 
1472,  at  Rome  in  1473  and  Parma  in  1481,  again  at  Venice 
in  1487,  1 49 1,  and  1499,  not  to  mention  Italian  translations 
which  appeared  at  Venice  in  1476  and  1489.^  These  edi- 
tions were  accompanied  by  some  published  criticism  of 
Pliny's  statements,  since  in  1492  appeared  at  Ferrara  a  treat- 
ise On  the  Errors  of  Pliny  and  Others  in  Medicine  by  Nich- 
olas Leonicenus  of  Vicenza  with  a  dedication  to  Politian.^ 
But  two  years  later  PHny  found  a  defender  in  Pandulph 
CoUenucius.^ 

But  Pliny's  future  influence  will  come  out  repeatedly  in 
later  chapters.  We  shall  now  inquire,  first,  what  signs  of 
experimental  science  he  shows,  either  derived  from  the  past 
or  added  by  himself.  Second,  what  he  defines  as  magic  and 
what  he  has  to  say  about  it.  Third,  how  much  of  what  he 
supposes  to  be  natural  science  must  we  regard  as  essentially 
magic  ? 

II.     Its  Experimental  Tendency 

It  is  probably  only  a  coincidence  that  two  medieval  manu-  impor- 
scripts  close  the  Natural  History  in  the  midst  of  the  seventy-  t^^ce  of 
sixth  chapter  of  the  last  book  with  the  words,  "Experimenta  tion  and 
plurihus  modis  constant  .  .  .  Primum  pondere/'  ^    But  al-  gnce^'' 
though  from  the  very  nature  of  his  work  Pliny  makes  ex- 
tensive use  of  authorities,  he  not  infrequently  manifests  a 
realization,  as  one  dealing  with  the  facts  of  nature  should,  of 
the  importance  of  observation  and  experience  as  means  of 

quo  exposuit  et  aperte  declaravlt  ana  Florentiae  adservantur,  1793- 

plinius  philosophus  quid   sit  lapis  1795,  II,  374-81. 

philosophicus    et    ex    qua    materia  'De  erroribus  Plinii  et  aliorum 

debet  fieri  et  quomodo."  in  medicina,  Ferrara,  1492. 

*  Fossi,        Catalogus        codicum  '  Pliniana  dcfensio,  1494. 

saeculo   XV  itnpressorum   qtd  in  *  Escorial  Q-I-4,  and  R-I-S,  both 

publico    Bibliotheca    Magliabechi-  of  the  14th  century. 


54  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap! 

reaching  the  truth.  The  claims  of  many  Romans  of  high 
rank  to  have  carried  their  arms  as  far  as  Mount  Atlas,  which 
Pliny  declares  has  been  repeatedly  shown  by  experience  to 
be  most  fallacious,  leads  him  to  the  further  reflection  that 
nowhere  is  a  lapse  of  one's  credulity  easier  than  where  a 
dignified  author  supports  a  false  statement.^  In  other  pas- 
sages he  calls  experience  the  best  teacher  in  all  things,^  and 
contrasts  unfavorably  garrulity  of  words  and  sitting  in 
schools  with  going  to  solitudes  and  seeking  herbs  at  their 
appropriate  seasons.  That  upon  our  globe  the  land  is  en- 
tirely surrounded  by  water  does  not  require,  he  says,  inves- 
tigation by  arguments,  but  is  now  known  by  experience.^ 
And  if  the  salamander  really  extinguished  fire,  it  would  have 
been  tried  at  Rome  long  ago.^  On  the  other  hand,  we  find 
some  assertions  in  the  Natural  History  which  Pliny  might 
easily  have  tested  himself  and  found  false,  such  as  his  state- 
ment that  an  egg-shell  cannot  be  broken  by  force  or  any 
weight  unless  it  is  tipped  a  little  to  one  side.^  Sometimes  he 
gives  his  personal  experience,®  but  also  mentions  experience 
in  many  other  connections. 
Use  of  The  word  employed  most  of  the  time  by  Pliny  to  denote 

the  word  experience  is  experimentum?  In  many  passages  the  word 
mentum.  does  not  indicate  anything  like  a  purposive,  prearranged, 
scientific  experiment  in  our  sense  of  that  word,  but  simply 
the  ordinary  experience  of  daily  life.®  We  are  also  told 
what  experti,^  or  men  of  experience,  advise.  In  a  number  of 
passages,  however,  experimentum  is  used  in  a  sense  some- 

*NH,  V,  I,  12.  41;   VII,   56;   VIII,   7;   XIV,  8; 

*XXVI,    6,    "usu    efficacissimo  XVI,  i ;  XVI,  64;  XVII,  2;  XVII, 

rerum  omnium  magistro" ;  XVII,  35;    XXII,    i;    XXII,   43;    XXII, 

2,  12,  "quare  experimentis  optime  49!  XXII,  51;  XXV,  7;  XXXIV, 

creditur."  39  and  51.     Experience  is  also  the 

3  jj    65  idea  in  the  two  following  passages, 

*XXIX    2'?  although  the  word  experimentum 

*XXTx'   TT  could  not  smoothly  be  rendered  as 

4f;i;:[f''       •  „  ,.  „  "experience"   in   a  literal   transla- 

-^    XXV    54,     cora-mque   nobis   ;  ^^^^.   yn,  50,  "Accedunt  experi- 

XXV,  106,   'nos  earn  Romanis  ex-  ^^^^^     ^^     exempla     recentissimi 

penmentis  per  usus  digeremus.  census  .  .  ." ;    XXVIII,    45,    "Nee 

'  Sometimes    another    term,    as  uros  aut  bisontes  habuerunt  Graeci 

usus  in  note  2  above,  is  employed.  in  experimentis." 

"See  II.  41,  1-2;   II,   108;  VII,  "XVI,  24;  XXII,  57;  XXVI,  60. 


n  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  55 

what  more  closely  approaching  our  "experiment."  These  are 
cases  where  something  is  being  tested.  For  instance,  a 
method  of  determining  whether  an  tgg  is  fresh  or  rotten  by 
putting  it  in  water  and  watching  if  it  floats  or  sinks  is  called 
an  experimentiim}  That  horses  would  whinny  at  no  other 
painting  of  a  horse  than  that  by  Apelles  is  spoken  of  as  illius 
cxperimentum  artis,  a  test  of,  or  testimony  to,  his  art."  The 
expression  religionis  experimento  is  applied  to  a  religious 
test  or  ordeal  by  which  the  virginity  of  Claudia  was  vindi- 
cated,^ The  word  is  also  used  of  ways  of  telling  if  unguents 
are  good^  and  if  wine  is  beginning  to  tum;^  and  of  various 
tests  of  the  genuineness  of  drugs,  gems,  earths,  and  metals.®" 
It  is  also  twice  used  of  letting  down  a  lighted  lamp  into  a 
huge  wine  cask  or  into  wells  to  discover  if  there  is  danger  at 
the  bottom  from  noxious  vapors.''^  If  the  lamp  was  ex- 
tinguished, it  was  a  sign  of  peril  to  human  life.  Pliny  fur- 
ther suggests  purposive  experimentation  in  speaking  of 
experimenta  to  discover  water  under  ground  ^  and  in  graft- 
ing trees. ^ 

Most  of  the  tests  and  experiences  thus  far  mentioned   Experi- 
have  been  practical  operations  connected  with  husbandry  and  ^^^"clen-^ 

industry.    But  Pliny  recounts  one  or  two  others  which  seem   *'^.^  ^u"- 

osity. 
to  have  been  dictated  solely  by  scientific  curiosity.  He  classi- 
fies the  following  as  experimenta:  ^°  the  sinking  of  a  well  to 
prove  by  its  complete  illumination  that  the  sun  casts  no 
shadow  at  noon  of  the  summer  solstice;  the  marking  of  a 
dolphin's  tail  in  order  to  throw  some  light  upon  its  length 
of  life,  should  it  ever  be  captured  again,  as  it  was  three 
hundred  years  later — perhaps  the  experiment  of  longest 
duration  on  record;  ^^  and  the  casting  of  a  man  into  a  pit  of 

*  X,  75.  22  and  76 ;  such  phrases  as  sinceri 

XXXV,  30.  experimentiim    and    vcri    experi- 

VII,  35.  mentum    are    used    for    "test    o£ 

XIII,  3.  genuineness." 

'XIV.  25.  'XXIII,  31;  XXXI,  28. 

'  XVII,  4 ;  XX,  3  and  76 ;  XXII,  «  XXXI,  27. 

23;  XXIX,   12;  XXXIII,   19  and  « XVII.  26. 

43  and  44  and  57;  XXXIV,  26  and  '"  II,  75. 

48 :  XXXVI,  38  and  55  ;  XXXVII,  "  IX,  7. 


56 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


Medical 
experi- 
mentation. 


Chance 
experience 
and  divine 
revelation. 


serpents  at  Rome  to  determine  if  he  was  really  immune  from 
their  stings.^ 

Experimentum  is  employed  by  Pliny  in  a  medical  sense 
which  becomes  very  common  in  the  middle  ages.  He  calls 
some  remedies  for  toothache  and  inflamed  eyes  certa  experi- 
menta — sure  experiences.^  Later  experimentum  came  to  be 
applied  to  almost  any  recipe  or  remedy.  Pliny,  indeed, 
speaks  of  the  doctors  as  learning  at  our  risk  and  getting 
experience  through  our  deaths.^  In  another  passage  he 
states  more  favorably  that  "there  is  no  end  to  experimenting 
with  everything  so  that  even  poisons  are  forced  to  cure  us."  * 
He  also  briefly  mentions  the  medical  sect  of  Empirics,  of 
whom  we  shall  hear  more  from  Galen.  He  says  that  they 
so  name  themselves  from  experiences  ^  and  originated  at 
Agrigentum  in  Sicily  under  Acron  and  Empedocles. 

Pliny  is  puzzled  how  some  things  which  he  finds  stated 
in  "authors  famous  for  wisdom"  were  ever  learned  by  ex- 
perience, for  example,  that  the  star-fish  has  such  fiery  fervor 
that  it  burns  everything  in  the  sea  which  it  touches,  and  di- 
gests its  food  instantly.®  That  adamant  can  be  broken  only 
by  goat's  blood  he  thinks  must  have  been  divinely  revealed, 
for  it  would  hardly  have  been  discovered  by  chance,  and  he 
cannot  imagine  that  anyone  would  ever  have  thought  of 
testing  a  substance  of  immense  value  in  a  fluid  of  one  of  the 
foulest  of  animals. ''^  In  several  other  passages  he  suggests 
chance,  accident,  dreams,®  or  divine  revelation  as  the  ways 
in  which  the  medicinal  virtues  of  certain  simples  were  dis- 
covered. Recently,  for  example,  it  was  discovered  that  the 
root  of  the  wild  rose  is  a  remedy  for  hydrophobia  by  the 
mother  of  a  soldier  in  the  praetorian  guard,  who  was  warned 
*  XXVIII,  6. 


'XXVIII,  14. 

•XXIX,  8.  "Discunt  periculis 
nostris  et  experimenta  per  mortes 
agunt."  Bostock  and  Riley  trans- 
late the  last  clause,  "And  they  ex- 
perimentalize by  putting  us  to 
death."  Another  possible  transla- 
tion is,  "And  their  experiments 
cost  lives." 


*XXV,  17.  ".  .  .  adeo  nullo 
omnia  experiendi  fine  ut  cogeren- 
tur  etiam  venena  prodesse." 

'XXIX,  4  "...  ab  experimen- 
tis  se  cognominans  empiricen." 

•  IX,  86. 
'XXXVII,    15. 

*  According  to  Galen,  as  we  shall 
hear  later,  the  Empirics  relied  a 
good  deal  upon  chance  experience 
and  dreams. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  57 

in  a  dream  to  send  her  son  this  root,  which  cured  him  and 
many  others  who  have  tried  it  since. ^  And  a  soldier  in 
Pompey's  time  accidentally  discovered  a  cure  for  elephan- 
tiasis when  he  hid  his  face  for  shame  in  some  wild  mint 
leaves.^  Another  herb  was  accidentally  found  to  be  a  cure 
for  disorders  of  the  spleen  when  the  entrails  of  a  sacrificial 
victim  happened  to  be  thrown  on  it  and  it  entirely  consumed 
the  milt.^  The  healing  properties  of  vinegar  for  the  sting 
of  the  asp  were  discovered  by  chance  in  this  wise.  A  man 
who  was  stung  by  an  asp  while  carrying  a  leather  bottle  of 
vinegar  noticed  that  he  felt  the  sting  only  when  he  set  the 
bottle  down.*  He  therefore  decided  to  try  the  effects  of  a 
drink  of  the  liquid  and  was  thereby  fully  cured.^  Other 
remedies  are  learned  through  the  experience  of  rustics  and 
illiterate  persons,  and  yet  others  may  be  discovered  by  ob- 
serving animals  who  cure  their  ills  by  them,*'  Pliny's  opinion 
is  that  the  animals  have  hit  upon  them  by  chance. 

Pliny  represents  a  number  of  marvelous  and  to  us  in-  Marvels 
credible  things  as  proved  by  experience.     Divination  from  gxperi- 
thunder,  for  instance,  is  supported  by  innumerable  experi-  ence. 
ences,  public  and  private.     In  two  passages  out  of  the  three 
mentioning  experti  which  I  cited  above,  those  experienced 
persons  recommended  a  decidedly  magical  sort  of  procedure.'^ 
In  another  passage  "the  experience  of  many"  supports  "a 
strange  observance"  in  plucking  a  bud.^     A  fourth  bit  of 
magical  procedure  is  called  "marvelous  but  easily  tested."  * 
Thus  the  transition  is  an  easy  one  from  signs  of  experimen- 
tal science  in  the  Natural  History  to  our  next  topic,  Pliny's 
account  of  magic. 

^  XXV,  6.  mouth,  it  will  prevent  one  from 

'  XX,  52.  feeling  the  heat  in  the  baths. 

"  XXV,  20.  '  XXV,  6  and  21  and  50 ;  XXVII, 

*  XXIII,  27.  2. 

"Among  other  virtues  of  vine-  'XVI,  24;  XXVI,  60. 

gar,  besides  its  supposed  property  *  XXIII,  59. 

of  breaking  rocks,  Pliny  mentions  *  XXVIII,  7. 
that    if    one    holds    some    in    the 


S8  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


III.     Pliny's  Account  of  Magic. 

Oriental  Pliny  supplies  some  account  of  the  origin  and  spread  of 

magic.  magic  ^  but  a  rather  confused  and  possibly  unreliable  one,  as 

he  mentions  two  Zoroasters  separated  by  an  interval  of  five 
or  six  thousand  years,  and  two  Osthaneses,  one  of  whom 
accompanied  Xerxes,  and  the  other  Alexander,  in  their  re- 
spective expeditions.  He  says,  indeed,  that  it  is  not  clear 
whether  one  or  two  Zoroasters  existed.  In  any  case  magic 
has  flourished  greatly  the  world  over  for  many  centuries, 
and  was  founded  in  Persia  by  Zoroaster.  Some  other  ma- 
gicians of  Media,  Babylonia,  and  Assyria  are  mere  names  to 
Pliny;  later  he  mentions  others  like  Apollobeches  and  Dar- 
danus.  Although  he  thus  derives  magic  from  the  orient,  he 
appears  to  make  no  distinction,  as  we  shall  find  other  writers 
doing,  between  the  Magi  of  Persia  and  ordinary  magicians, 
nor  does  he  employ  the  word  magic  in  two  senses.  He  makes 
it  evident,  however,  that  there  have  been  other  men  who  have 
regarded  magic  more  favorably  than  he  does. 

Its  spread  Pliny  next  traces  the  spread  of  magic  among  the  Greeks. 

Greeks.  -^^  marvels  at  the  lack  of  it  in  the  Iliad  and  the  abundance 
of  it  in  the  Odyssey.  He  is  uncertain  whether  to  class  Or- 
pheus as  a  magician,  and  mentions  Thessaly  as  famous  for 
its  witches  at  least  as  early  as  the  time  of  Menander  who 
named  one  of  his  comedies  after  them.  But  he  regards  the 
Osthanes  who  accompanied  Xerxes  as  the  prime  introducer 
of  magic  to  the  Greek-speaking  world,  which  straightway 
went  mad  over  it.  In  order  to  learn  more  of  it,  the  philos- 
ophers Pythagoras,  Empedocles,  Democritus,  and  Plato 
went  into  distant  exile  and  on  their  return  disseminated  their 
lore.  Pliny  regards  the  works  of  Democritus  as  the  greatest 
single  factor  in  that  dissemination  of  the  doctrines  of  magic 
which  occurred  at  about  the  same  time  that  medicine  was 
being    developed    by    the    works    of    Hippocrates.      Some 

*  In  the  opening  chapters  of  Book  XXX,  unless  otherwise  indicated  by- 
specific  citation. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  59 

regarded  the  books  on  magic  ascribed  to  Democritus  as 
spurious,  but  Pliny  insists  that  they  are  genuine.^ 

Outside  of  the  Greek-speaking  world,  whence  of  course  Its  spread 
magic  spread  to  Rome,  Pliny  mentions  Jewish  magic,  repre-  Qraeco- 
sented  by  such  names  as  Moses,  Tannes,  and  Lotapes.     But   Roman 

-1  •    •  1       TT  1  world. 

he  holds  that  magic  did  not  originate  among  the  Hebrews 
until  long  after  Zoroaster.  He  also  speaks  of  the  magic  of 
Cyprus;  of  the  Druids,  who  were  the  magicians,  diviners, 
and  medicine  men  of  Gaul  until  the  emperor  Tiberius  sup- 
pressed them ;  and  of  distant  Britain. ^  Thus  discordant  na- 
tions and  even  those  ignorant  of  one  another's  existence 
agree  the  world  over  in  their  devotion  to  magic.  From  what 
Pliny  tells  us  elsewhere  of  the  Scythians  we  can  see  that  the 
nomads  of  the  Russian  steppes  and  Turkestan  were  devoted 
to  magic  too. 

It  has  been  shown  that  Pliny  regarded  magic  as  a  mass   Failure 
of  doctrines  formulated  by  a  single  founder  and  not  as  a   stand  its' 
gradual  social  evolution,  just  as  the  Greeks  and  Romans  as-  true  origin. 
cribed  their  laws  and  customs  to  some  single  legislator.    He 
admits  in  a  way,  however,  the  great  antiquity  claimed  by 
magic  for  itself,  although  he  questions  how  the  bulky  dicta 
of  Zoroaster  and  Dardanus  could  have  been  handed  down  by 
memory  during  so  long  a  period.    This  remark  again  shows 
how  little  he  thinks  of  magic  as  a  set  of  social  customs  and 
attitudes  perpetuated  through  constant  and  universal  prac- 
tice from  generation  to  generation.    Yet  what  he  says  of  its 
v/idespread  prevalence  among  unconnected  peoples  goes  to 
prove  this. 

Pliny  has  a  clearer  comprehension  of  the  extensive  scope   Magic  and 
of  magic  and  of  its  essential  characteristics,  at  least  as  it  was   divination, 
in  his  day.     "No  one  should  wonder,"  he  says,  "that  its  au- 
thority has  been  very  great,  since  alone  of  the  arts  it  has 

*Aulus     Gellius,     X,     12,     and  wrote   the   works   of   alchemy  at- 

Columella,    VII,    5,    dispute    this  tributed  to  Democritus  as  well  as 

(Bouche-Leclercq,        L'Astrologie  the  books  of  medical  and  magical 

grecque,  p.  519).     Berthelot  {Ori-  recipes    which    are   quoted   in   the 

gines  de  I'alchimie,  p.  145)  believes  Geoponica  and  the  Natural  His- 

in  a  Democritan  school  at  the  be-  tory. 

ginning  of  the  Christian  era  which  ^  XVI,  95. 


6o 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


Magic  and 
religion. 


Magic  and 
medicine. 


Magic 
and  philos- 
ophy. 


embraced  and  united  with  itself  the  three  other  subjects 
which  make  the  greatest  appeal  to  the  human  mind,"  namely, 
medicine,  religion,  and  the  arts  of  divination,  especially  as- 
trology. That  his  phrase  artes  mathematicas  has  reference 
to  astrology  is  shown  by  his  immediately  continuing,  "since 
there  is  no  one  who  is  not  eager  to  learn  the  future  about 
himself  and  who  does  not  think  that  this  is  most  truly  re- 
vealed by  the  sky."  But  magic  further  "promises  to  reveal 
the  future  by  water  and  spheres  and  air  and  stars  and  lamps 
and  basins  and  the  blades  of  axes  and  by  many  other 
methods,  besides  conferences  with  shades  from  the  infernal 
regions."  There  can  therefore  be  no  doubt  that  Pliny  re- 
gards the  various  arts  of  divination  as  parts  of  magic. 

While  we  have  heard  Pliny  assert  in  general  the  close 
connection  between  magic  and  religion,  the  character  of  the 
Natural  History,  which  deals  with  natural  rather  than  re- 
ligious matters,  does  not  lead  him  to  enter  into  much  further 
detail  upon  this  point.  His  occasional  mention  of  religious 
usages  in  his  own  day,  however,  supports  our  information 
from  other  sources  that  the  original  Roman  religion  was 
very  largely  composed  of  magic  forces,  rules,  and  cere- 
monial. 

Nearly  half  the  books  of  the  Natural  History  deal  in 
whole  or  in  part  with  remedies  for  diseases,  and  it  is  there- 
fore of  the  relations  between  magic  and  natural  science,  and 
more  particularly  between  magic  and  medicine,  that  Pliny 
gives  us  the  most  detailed  information.  Indeed,  he  asserts 
that  "no  one  doubts"  that  magic  "originally  sprang  from 
medicine  and  crept  in  under  the  show  of  promoting  health 
as  a  loftier  and  more  sacred  medicine."  Magic  and  medi- 
cine have  developed  together,  and  the  latter  is  now  in  immi- 
nent danger  of  being  overwhelmed  by  the  follies  of  magic, 
which  have  made  men  doubt  whether  plants  possess  any 
medicinal  properties. 

In  the  opinion  of  many,  however,  magic  is  sound  and 
beneficial  learning.  In  antiquity,  and  for  that  matter  at 
almost  all  times,  the  height  of  literary  fame  and  glory  has 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  6i    " 

been  sought  from  that  science.^  Eudoxus  would  have  it  the 
most  noted  and  useful  of  all  schools  of  philosophy.  Em- 
pedocles  and  Plato  studied  it;  Pythagoras  and  Democritus 
perpetuated  it  in  their  writings. 

But  Pliny  himself  feels  that  the  assertions  of  the  books  Falseness 
of  magic  are  fantastic,  exaggerated,  and  untrue.  He  re-  °  "lag^c. 
peatedly  brands  the  magi  or  magicians  as  fools  or  impostors, 
and  their  statements  as  absurd  and  impudent  tissues  of  lies.^ 
Vanitas,  or  "nonsense,"  is  his  stock-word  for  their  beliefs.* 
Some  of  their  writings  must,  in  his  opinion,  have  been  dic- 
tated by  a  feeling  of  contempt  and  derision  for  humanity.* 
Nero  proved  the  falseness  of  the  art,  for  although  he  studied 
magic  eagerly  and  with  his  unlimited  wealth  and  power  had 
every  opportunity  to  become  a  skilful  practitioner,  he  was 
unable  to  work  any  marvels  and  abandoned  the  attempt.^ 
Pliny  therefore  comes  to  the  conclusion  that  magic  is  "in- 
valid and  empty,  yet  has  some  shadows  of  truth,  which 
however  are  due  more  to  poisons  than  to  magic."  ^ 

The  last  remark  brings  us  to  charges  of  evil  practices  Crimes 
made  against  the  magicians.  Besides  poisons,  they  special-  °  "lagic. 
ize  in  love-potions  and  drugs  to  produce  abortions ; '''  and 
some  of  their  operations  are  inhuman  or  obscene  and  abom- 
inable. They  attempt  baleful  sorcery  or  the  transfer  of  dis- 
ease from  one  person  to  another.^  Osthanes  and  even  Dem- 
ocritus propound  such  remedies  as  drinking  human  blood  or 
utilizing  in  magic  compounds  and  ceremonies  parts  of  the 
corpses  of  men  who  have  been  violently  slain. ^  Pliny  thinks 
that  humanity  owes  a  great  debt  to  the  Roman  government 

'  XXX,  2.    ".  .  .  quamquam  ani-  XXIX,    26 ;    XXX,   7 ;    XXXVII, 

madverto       summam       Htterarum  14. 

claritatem   gloriamque   ex   ea   sci-  ■*  XXXVII,  40. 

entia  antiquitus   et  paene  semper  » XXX    5-6. 

petitam."  «XXx',    6.'    "Proinde    ita    per- 

Examples  are :  XXV,  59,    Sed  ^^^^^^   ^j^    intestabilem,   inritam. 

magi  utique  circa  banc  insaniunt   ;  j^^^^^^     ^^^^^      habentem     tamen 

XXIX,  20     magorum  mendacia   ;  q^asdam  veritatis  umbras,  sed  in 

XXXVII,  60,     magorum  inpuden-  j^j^    veneficas    artis    pollere,    non 

tiae  vel  manifestissimum  .  .  .  ex-  niagicas  " 

emplum";     XXXVII,     72),     "dira  'XXV    7 

mendacia  magorum."  ,     :L    '  ;" 

'See     XXII,     9;     XXVI,     9;  * XXVIII,  23. 

XXVII,  6s;  XXVIII,  2.^  and  27;  "  XXVIII,  2. 


62 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Pliny's 
censure  of 
magic  is 
mainly  in- 
tellectual. 


Vagueness 
of  Pliny's 
scepticism. 


for  abolishing  those  monstrous  rites  of  human  sacrifice,  "in 
which  to  slay  a  man  was  thought  most  pious ;  nay  more,  to 
eat  men  was  thought  most  wholesome."  ^ 

Pliny  nevertheless  lays  less  stress  upon  the  moral  argu- 
ment against  magic  as  criminal  or  indecent  than  he  does 
upon  the  intellectual  objection  to  it  as  untrue  and  unscientific. 
Indeed,  so  far  as  decency  is  concerned,  his  own  medicine  will 
be  seen  to  be  far  from  prudish,  while  he  elsewhere  gives  in- 
stances of  magicians  guarding  against  defilement.^  More- 
over, among  the  methods  employed  and  the  results  sought 
by  magic  which  he  frequently  mentions  there  are  compara- 
tively few  that  are  morally  objectionable,  although  they  seem 
without  exception  false.  But  many  of  their  recipes  aim  at 
the  cure  of  disease  and  other  worthy,  or  at  least  admissible, 
objects.  Possibly  Pliny  has  somewhat  censored  their  lore 
and  tried  to  exclude  all  criminal  secrets,  but  his  censure 
seems  more  intellectual  than  moral.  For  instance,  he  fills 
a  long  chapter  with  extracts  from  a  treatise  on  the  virtues  of 
the  chameleon  and  its  parts  by  Democritus,  whom  he  regards 
as  a  leading  purveyor  of  magic  lore.^  In  opening  the  chap- 
ter Pliny  hails  "with  great  pleasure"  the  opportunity  to  ex- 
pose "the  lies  of  Greek  vanity,"  but  at  its  close  he  expresses 
a  wish  that  Democritus  himself  had  been  touched  with  the 
branch  of  a  palm  which  he  said  prevents  immoderate  loquac- 
ity. Pliny  then  adds  more  charitably,  "It  is  evident  that 
this  man,  who  in  other  respects  was  a  wise  and  most  useful 
member  of  society,  has  erred  from  too  great  zeal  in  serving 
humanity." 

Pliny  himself  fails  to  maintain  a  consistently  sceptical  at- 
titude towards  magic.  His  exact  attitude  is  often  hard  to  de- 
termine. Often  it  is  difficult  to  say  whether  he  is  speaking 
in  sober  earnest  or  in  a  tone  of  light  and  easy  pleasantry 
and  sarcasm,  as  in  the  passage  just  cited  concerning  Democ- 
ritus. Another  puzzling  point  is  his  frequent  excuse  that 
he  will  list  certain  assertions  of  the  magicians  in  order  to 

*XXX,  4.  'XXVIII,   19;   XXX,  6.  'XXVIII,   29. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  63 

expose  or  confute  them.  But  really  he  usually  simply  sets 
them  forth,  apparently  expecting  that  their  inherent  and 
patent  absurdity  will  prove  a  sufficient  refutation  of  them. 
On  the  rare  occasions  when  he  undertakes  to  indicate  in 
what  the  absurdity  consists  his  reasoning  is  scarcely  scientific 
or  convincing.  Thus  he  affirms  that  "it  is  a  peculiar  proof 
of  the  vanity  of  the  magicians  that  of  all  animals  they  most 
admire  moles  who  are  condemned  by  nature  in  so  many  ways, 
to  perpetual  blindness  and  to  dig  in  the  darkness  as  if  they 
were  buried."  ^  And  he  assails  the  belief  of  the  magi  ^  that 
an  owl's  egg  is  good  for  diseases  of  the  scalp  by  asking, 
"Who,  I  beg,  could  ever  have  seen  an  owl's  e.gg,  since  it  is 
a  prodigy  to  see  the  bird  itself?"  Moreover,  he  sometimes 
cites  assertions  of  the  magicians  without  any  censure,  apol- 
ogy, or  expression  of  disbelief;  and  there  are  many  other 
passages  where  it  is  practically  impossible  to  tell  whether  he 
is  citing  the  magicians  or  not.  Sometimes  he  will  apparently 
continue  to  refer  to  them  by  a  pronoun  in  chapters  where 
they  have  not  been  mentioned  by  name  at  all.^  In  other 
places  he  will  imperceptibly  cease  to  quote  the  magi  and 
after  an  interval  perhaps  as  imperceptibly  resume  citation  of 
their  doctrines.*  It  is  also  difficult  to  determine  just  when 
writers  like  Democritus  and  Pythagoras  are  to  be  regarded 
as  representatives  of  magic  and  when  their  statements  are 
accepted  by  Pliny  as  those  of  sound  philosophers. 

Perhaps,  despite  Pliny's  occasional  brave  efforts  to  with-  j^agic  and 
stand  and  even  ridicule  the  assertions  of  the  magicians,  he   science 
could  not  free  himself  from  a  secret  liking  for  them  aiid  guishable. 
more  than  half  believed  them.    At  any  rate  he  believed  very 
similar  things.     Even  more  likely  is  it  that  previous  works 
on  nature  were  so  full  of  such  material  and  the  readers  of 
his  own  day  so  interested  in  it,  that  he  could  not  but  include 

^XXX,  7.  we  must  look  back  three  chapters 
*XXIX,  26.  for  the  antecedent  of  corum. 
^Fot  instance,  XXX,  27,  he  *  XXXVII,  14,  he  says  that  he  is 
mentions  the  magi,  but  not  in  going  to  confute  "the  unspeakable 
XXX,  28.  Nor  are  they  mentioned  nonsense  of  the  magicians"  con- 
in  XXX,  29,  but  in  XXX,  30  cerning  gems,  but  makes  no  spe- 
"plura  eorum  remedia  ponemus"  cific  citation  from  them  until  the 
seems  to  refer  to  them,  although  thirty-seventh  chapter  on  jasper. 


64  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

much  of  it.  Once  he  explains  ^  that  certain  statements  are 
scarcely  to  be  taken  seriously,  yet  should  not  be  omitted,  be- 
cause they  have  been  transmitted  from  the  past.  Again  he 
begs  the  reader's  indulgence  for  similar  "vanities  of  the 
Greeks,"  "because  this  too  has  its  value  that  we  should 
know  whatever  marvels  they  have  transmitted."  ^  The  truth 
of  the  matter  probably  is  that  Pliny  rejected  some  assertions 
of  the  magicians  but  found  others  acceptable;  that  he  gets 
his  occasional  attitude  of  scepticism  and  ridicule  of  their 
doctrines  from  one  set  of  authorities,  and  his  moments  of 
unquestioning  acceptance  of  their  statements  from  other 
authors  on  whom  he  relies.  Very  likely  in  the  books  which 
he  used  it  often  was  no  clearer  than  it  is  in  the  Natural 
History  whether  a  statement  was  to  be  ascribed  to  the  magi 
or  not.  Very  possibly  Pliny  was  as  confused  in  his  own 
mind  concerning  the  entire  business  as  he  seems  to  be  to  us. 
He  could  no  more  keep  magic  out  of  his  Natural  History 
than  poor  Mr,  Dick  could  keep  Charles  the  First's  head  out 
of  his  book.  One  fact  at  any  rate  stands  out  clearly,  the 
prominence  of  magic  in  his  encyclopedia  and  in  the  learning 
of  his  age. 

IV.     The  Science  of  the  Magi 

Magicians  Let  US  now  further  examine  Pliny's  picture  of  magic, 

gators  of  riot  as  he  expressly  defines  or  censures  it,  but  as  he  reflects 
nature.  j^g  q-^^  assertions  and  purposes  in  his  fairly  numerous  cita- 
tions from  its  literature  and  perhaps  its  practice.  Here  I 
shall  rather  strictly  limit  my  survey  to  those  statements 
which  Pliny  definitely  ascribes  by  name  to  the  magi  or  magic 
art.  The  most  striking  fact  is  that  the  magicians  are  cited 
again  and  again  concerning  the  supposed  properties,  virtues, 
and  effects  of  things  in  nature — herbs,  animals,  and  stones. 
These  virtues  are,  it  is  true,  often  employed  in  an  effort  to 
produce  wonderful  results,  and  often  too  they  are  combined 
with  some  fantastic  rite  or  superstitious  ceremonial  per- 
formed by  a  human  agent.  But  in  many  cases  either  no 
»XXX,  47.  =" XXXVII,   II. 


on  herbs. 


rx  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  65 

rite  at  all  is  suggested  or  merely  some  simple  medicinal  ap- 
plication; and  in  a  few  cases  there  is  no  mention  of  any  par- 
ticular operation  or  result,  the  magicians  are  cited  simply 
as  authorities  concerning  the  great  but  unspecified  virtues  of 
natural  objects.  Indeed,  they  stand  out  in  Pliny's  pages  not 
as  mere  sorcerers  or  enchanters  or  wonder-workers,  but  as 
those  who  have  gone  the  farthest  and  in  most  detail — too  far 
and  too  curiously  in  Pliny's  opinion — into  the  study  of  medi- 
cine and  of  nature.  Sometimes  their  statements,  cited  with- 
out censure,  supplement  others  concerning  the  species  under 
discussion;^  sometimes  they  are  his  sole  source  of  informa- 
tion on  the  subject  in  hand.^ 

Pliny  connects  the  origin  of  botany  rather  closely  with  The  magi 
magic,  mentioning  Medea  and  Circe  as  early  investigators 
of  plants  and  Orpheus  among  the  first  writers  on  the  sub- 
ject.^ Moreover,  Pythagoras  and  Democritus  borrowed 
from  the  mac/i  of  the  orient  in  their  works  on  the  properties 
of  plants.^  There  would  be  little  profit  in  repeating  the 
names  of  the  herbs  concerning  which  Pliny  gives  opinions 
of  the  magicians,  inasmuch  as  few  of  them  can  be  associated 
with  any  plants  known  to-day.^  Suffice  it  to  say  that  Pliny 
makes  no  objection  to  the  herbs  which  they  employed.  Nor 
does  he  criticize  their  methods  of  employing  them,  although 
some  seem  superstitious  enough  to  the  modern  reader.  A 
chaplet  is  worn  of  one  herb,®  others  are  plucked  with  the 
left  hand  and  with  a  statement  of  what  they  are  to  be  used 
for,  and  in  one  case  without  looking  backward.'^  The  anem- 
one is  to  be  plucked  when  it  first  appears  that  year  with  a 
statement  of  its  intended  use,  and  then  is  to  be  wrapped  in  a 
red  cloth  and  kept  in  the  shade,  and,  whenever  anyone  falls 
sick  of  tertian  or  quartan  fever,  is  to  l3e  bound  on  the  pa- 
tient's body.^    The  heliotrope  is  not  to  be  plucked  at  all  but 

'XX,    30;    XXI,    38,    94,    104;  104;  XXII,  9,  24,  29;  XXIV,  99. 

XXII,  24,  29.  102;  XXV,  59,  65,  80-81;  XXVI, 

=XXI,  36;   XXIV,  99.  9- 

'  XXV,  5.  *  XXI,  38. 

^XXIV,  99-102.  'XXI,  104;  XXII,  24. 

^See  XX,  30;  XXI,  36,  38,  94,  'XXI.  94. 


66 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Marvelous 
virtues 
of  herbs. 


tied  in  three  or  four  knots  with  a  prayer  that  the  patient  may 
recover  to  untie  the  knots. ^ 

PHny  does  not  even  object  to  the  marvelous  results  which 
the  magi  think  can  be  gained  by  use  of  herbs  until  towards 
the  close  of  his  twenty-fourth  book,  although  already  in  his 
twentieth  and  twenty-first  books  such  powers  have  been 
claimed  for  herbs  as  to  make  one  well-favored  and  enable 
one  to  attain  one's  desires,^  or  to  give  one  grace  and  glory.^ 
At  the  end  of  his  twenty-fourth  book  *  he  states  that  Pythag- 
oras and  Democritus,  following  the  magi,  ascribe  to  herbs 
unusually  marvelous  virtues  such  as  to  freeze  water,  invoke 
spirits,  force  the  guilty  to  confess  by  frightening  them  with 
apparitions,  and  impart  the  gift  of  divination.  Early  in  his 
twenty-fifth  book  ^  Pliny  suggests  that  some  incredible  effects 
have  been  attributed  to  herbs  by  the  magi  and  their  disciples, 
and  in  a  later  chapter  ®  he  describes  the  magi  as  so  mad  about 
vervain  that  they  think  that  if  they  are  anointed  with  it, 
they  can  gain  their  wishes,  drive  away  fevers  and  other  dis- 
eases, and  make  friendships.  The  herb  should  be  plucked 
about  the  rising  of  the  dog-star  when  there  is  neither  sun 
nor  moon.  Honey  and  honeycomb  should  be  offered  to  ap- 
pease the  earth;  then  the  plant  should  be  dug  around  with 
iron  with  the  left  hand  and  raised  aloft.  By  the  time  he 
reaches  his  twenty-sixth  book  Pliny's  courage  has  risen,  so 
to  speak,  enough  to  cause  him  at  last  to  enter  upon  quite  a 
tirade  against  "magical  vanities  which  have  been  carried  so 
far  that  they  might  destroy  faith  in  herbs  entirely."  "^  As 
examples  he  mentions  herbs  supposed  to  dry  up  rivers  and 
swamps,  open  barred  doors  at  their  touch,  turn  hostile  armies 
to  flight,  and  supply  all  the  needs  of  the  ambassadors  of  the 
Persian  kings.  He  wonders  why  such  herbs  have  never 
been  employed  in  Roman  warfare  or  Italian  drainage. 
Pliny's  only  objection  to  magic  herbs  therefore  seems  to  be 
the  excessive  powers  which  are  claimed  for  some  of  them. 


'XXII,  29. 
'XX,  30. 
•XXI,   38. 
*XXIV,  99  and   102. 


'XXV,  5. 
«XXV,    59. 
'XXVI,  9- 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  67 

He  adds  that  it  would  be  strange  that  the  creduhty  which 
arose  from  such  wholesome  beginnings  had  reached  such  a 
pitch,  if  human  ingenuity  observed  moderation  in  anything 
and  if  the  much  more  recent  system  of  medicine  which  As- 
clepiades  founded  could  not  be  shown  to  have  been  carried 
even  beyond  the  magicians.  Here  again  we  see  Pliny  failing 
to  recognize  magic  as  a  primitive  social  product  and  regard- 
ing it  as  a  degeneration  from  ancient  science  rather  than 
science  as  a  comparatively  modern  development  from  it. 
But  he  may  well  be  right  in  thinking  that  many  particular 
far-fetched  recipes  and  rites  were  the  late,  artificial  product 
of  over-scholarly  magicians.  Thus  he  brands  as  false  and 
magical  the  assertion  of  a  recent  grammarian,  Apion,  that 
the  herb  cynocephalia  is  divine  and  a  safeguard  against 
poison,  but  kills  the  man  who  uproots  it  entirely.-^ 

In  a  few  cases  Pliny  objects  to  the  animals  or  parts  of  Animals 
animals  employed  by  the  magi,  as  in  the  passage  already  cited  of^^^f/*^ 
where  he  complains  that  they  admire  moles  more  than  any  mals. 
other  animals.^  But  his  assertion  is  inconsistent,  since  he 
has  already  affirmed  that  they  hold  the  hyena  in  most  admi- 
ration of  all  animals  on  the  ground  that  it  works  magic  upon 
men.^  Their  promise  of  readier  favor  with  peoples  and 
kings  to  those  who  anoint  themselves  with  lion's  fat,  espe- 
cially that  between  the  eyebrows,  he  criticizes  by  declaring 
that  no  fat  can  be  found  there.^  He  also  twits  the  magi  for 
magnifying  the  importance  of  so  nasty  a  creature  as  the  tick.^ 
They  are  attracted  to  it  by  the  fact  that  it  has  no  outlet  to 
its  body  and  can  live  only  seven  days  even  if  it  fasts. 
Whether  there  is  any  astrological  significance  in  the  number 
seven  here  Pliny  does  not  say.  He  does  inform  us,  how- 
ever, that  the  cricket  is  employed  in  magic  because  it  moves 
backward.^  A  very  bizarre  object  employed  by  the  Druids 
and  other  magicians  is  a  sort  of  tgg  produced  by  the  hissing 
or  foam  of  snakes."^    The  blood  of  the  basilisk  may  also  be 

;XXX,  6.  'XXX,  24. 

"xxviiii  27.  "xxix,  39. 

*  XXVIII,  25.  'XXIX.  12. 


68  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

classed  as  a  rarity.  Apparently  animals  in  some  way  un- 
usual are  preferred  in  magic,  like  a  black  sheep/  but  the 
logic  in  the  reasons  given  by  Pliny  for  their  selection  is  not 
clear  in  every  instance.  In  some  other  cases  not  criticized 
by  Pliny  ^  we  have  plainly  enough  sympathetic  magic  or  the 
principle  of  like  cures  like,  as  when  the  milt  of  a  calf  or  sheep 
is  used  to  cure  diseases  of  the  human  spleen. 
Further  The  magicians,  however,  do  not  scorn  to  use  familiar 

instances 

and  easily  obtainable  animals  like  the  goat  and  dog  and  cat. 
The  liver  and  dung  of  a  cat,  a  puppy's  brains,  the  blood  and 
genitals  of  a  dog,  and  the  gall  of  a  black  male  dog  are  among 
the  animal  substances  employed.^  Such  substances  as  those 
just  named  are  equally  in  demand  from  other  animals.^  Mi- 
nute parts  of  animals  are  frequently  employed  by  the  magi- 
cians, such  as  the  toe  of  an  owl,  the  liver  of  a  mouse  given 
in  a  fig,  the  tooth  of  a  live  mole,  the  stones  from  young 
swallows'  gizzards,  the  eyes  of  river  crabs.^  Sometimes 
the  part  employed  is  reduced  to  ashes,  perhaps  a  relic  of 
sacrificial  custom.  Thus  for  toothache  the  magi  inject  into 
the  ear  nearer  the  tooth  the  ashes  of  the  head  of  a  mad  dog 
and  oil  of  Cyprus,  while  they  prescribe  for  affections  of 
the  sinews  the  ashes  of  an  owl's  head  in  honied  wine  with 
lily  root.^  Other  living  creatures  which  Pliny  mentions  as 
used  by  the  magi  are  the  salamander,  earthworm,  bat,  scarab 
with  reflex  horns,  lizard,  tortoise,  bed-bug,  frog,  and  sea- 
urchin.'^  The  dragon's  tail  wrapped  in  a  gazelle's  skin  and 
bound  on  with  deer-sinews  cures  epilepsy,®  and  a  mixture 
of  the  dragon's  tongue,  eyes,  gall,  and  intestines,  boiled  in 
oil,  cooled  in  the  night  air,  and  rubbed  on  morning  and 
evening,  frees  one  from  nocturnal  apparitions.® 

Sometimes  the  parts  of  animals  are  bound  on  outside 
the  patient's  body,  sometimes  the  injured  portion  of  his  body 

^XXX,  6.  7;  XXX,  27;  XXXII.  38. 
'XXVIII,  57;  XXX,   17.  «XXX,    8    and    36;     see    also 

"Use  of  goat,  XXVIII,  56,  63,  XXVIII.  60;  XXXII,  19  and  24. 

78-79;    cat,    XXVIII,   66;    puppy,  'XXIX,   23;    XXX,    18,  20,  30. 

XXIX,  38:  dop,  XXX,  21.  49;  XXXII,  14,  18,  24. 

*  XXVIII,  60,  66,  77;  XXIX,  26.  *XXX,  27. 

•  XXVIII,  66 ;  XXIX,  15  ;  XXX,  "  XXX,  24. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  69 

is  merely  touched  with  them.  Once  the  whole  house  is  to  be  Magic 
fumigated  with  the  substance  in  question ;  ^  once  the  walls  "nf^als 
are  to  be  sprinkled  with  it ;  once  it  is  to  be  buried  under  the  and  parts 
threshold.  Some  instances  follow  of  more  elaborate  magic 
ritual  connected  with  the  use  of  animals  or  parts  of  animals. 
The  hyena  is  more  easily  captured  by  a  hunter  who  ties 
seven  knots  in  his  girdle  and  horsewhip,  and  it  should  be 
captured  when  the  moon  is  in  the  sign  of  Gemini  and  with- 
out the  loss  of  a  single  hair.^  Another  bit  of  astrology  dis- 
pensed by  the  tnagi  is  that  the  cat,  whose  salted  liver  is 
taken  with  wine  for  quartan  fever,  should  have  been  killed 
under  a  waning  moon.^  To  cure  incontinence  of  urine  one 
not  only  drinks  ashes  of  a  boar's  genitals  in  sweet  wine,  but 
afterwards  urinates  in  a  dog  kennel  and  repeats  the  for- 
mula, "That  I  may  not  urinate  like  a  dog  in  its  kennel."  * 
The  magicians  insist  that  the  sex  of  the  patient  be  observed 
in  administering  burnt  cow-dung  or  bull-dung  in  honied 
wine  for  cases  of  dropsy.^  For  infantile  ailments  the  brains 
of  a  she-goat  should  be  passed  through  a  gold  ring  and 
dropped  in  the  baby's  mouth  before  it  is  given  its  milk.® 
After  the  fresh  milt  of  a  sheep  has  been  applied  to  the  pa- 
tient with  the  words,  "This  I  do  for  the  cure  of  the  spleen," 
it  should  be  plastered  into  the  bedroom  wall  and  sealed  with 
a  ring,  while  the  charm  should  be  repeated  twenty-seven 
times."^  In  treating  sciatica^  an  earthworm  should  be  placed 
in  a  broken  wooden  dish  mended  with  an  iron  band,  the 
dish  should  be  filled  with  water,  the  worm  should  be  buried 
again  where  it  was  dug  up,  and  the  water  should  be  drunk 
by  the  patient.  The  eyes  of  river  crabs  are  to  be  attached 
to  the  patient's  person  before  sunrise  and  the  blinded  crabs 
put  back  into  the  water.^  After  it  has  been  carried  around 
the  house  thrice  a  bat  may  be  nailed  head  down  outside  a 
window  as  an  amulet. ^^    For  epilepsy  goat's  flesh  should  be 

^XXX,  24.  "XXVIII,  78. 

'XXVIII,  27.  'XXX,  17. 

» XXVIII,  66;   and   see  XXIX,  ^XXX    18 

'^*xxvTii,  60.  'xxxii,  38. 

"  XXVIII,  68.  "XXIX,  26. 


70 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Marvels 
wrought 
with  parts 
of  ani- 
mals. 


The  magi 
on  stones. 


given  which  has  been  roasted  on  a  funeral  pyre,  and  the 
animal's  gall  should  not  be  allowed  to  touch  the  ground.^ 

Pliny  occasionally  speaks  in  a  vague  general  way  of  his 
citations  from  the  magi  concerning  the  virtues  of  parts  of 
animals  as  lies  or  nonsense  or  ''portentous,"  but  he  does  not 
specifically  criticize  their  procedure  any  more  than  he  did 
their  methods  of  employing  herbs,  and  he  does  not  criticize 
their  promised  results  as  much  as  he  did  before.  Indeed,  as 
we  have  already  indicated,  the  object  in  a  majority  of  cases 
is  purely  medicinal.  The  purpose  of  others  is  pastoral  or 
agricultural,  such  as  preventing  goats  from  straying  or  caus- 
ing swine  to  follow  you.^  The  blood  of  the  basilisk,  how- 
ever, is  said  to  procure  answers  to  petitions  made  to  the 
powerful  and  prayers  addressed  to  the  gods,  and  to  act 
as  a  safeguard  against  poison  or  sorcery  {veneficiorum 
amuleta).^  Invincibility  is  promised  the  wearer  of  the  head 
and  tail  of  a  dragon,  hairs  from  a  lion's  forehead,  a  lion's 
marrow,  the  foam  of  a  winning  horse,  a  dog's  claw  bound 
in  deerskin,  and  the  muscles  alternately  of  a  deer  and  a 
gazelle.*  A  woman  will  tell  secrets  in  her  sleep  if  the  heart 
of  an  owl  is  applied  to  her  right  breast,  and  power  of  divina- 
tion is  gained  by  eating  the  still  palpitating  heart  of  a  mole.'^ 

In  the  case  of  stones  the  names  are  again,  as  in  the  case 
of  herbs,  of  little  significance  for  us.^  The  accompany- 
ing ritual  is  slight.  There  are  one  or  two  suspensions 
from  the  neck  or  elsewhere  by  such  means  as  a  lion's  mane — 
the  hair  of  the  hyena  will  not  do  at  all — nor  the  hair  of  the 
cynocephalus  and  swallows'  feathers. '^  There  is  some  use  of 
incantations  with  the  stones,  a  setting  of  iron  for  one  stone, 
burial  of  another  beneath  a  tree  that  it  may  not  dull  the  axe, 
and  placing  another  on  the  tongue  after  rinsing  the  mouth 
with  honey  at  certain  days  and  hours  of  the  moon  in  order  to 
acquire  the  gift  of  divination.^    Indeed,  the  results  promised 


*  XXVIII,  63. 

*  XXVIII,  56;  XXIX,  15. 
"XXIX,    19. 

*XXIX,  20. 
*XXIX,  26;  XXX,  7. 

*  Pliny  ascribes  statements 


cerning  stones  to  the  magi  in  the 
following  chapters:  XXXVI,  34; 
XXXVII,  37,  40,  49,  SI,  54,  56,  60, 
70,  73- 

'  XXXVII,  54  and  40. 

*  XXXVII,  40,  60,  56,  73- 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  71 

are  all  marvelous.  The  stones  benefit  public  speakers,  admit 
to  the  presence  of  royalty,  counteract  fascination  and  sor- 
cery, avert  hail,  thunderbolts,  storms,  locusts,  and  scorpions ; 
chill  boiling  water,  produce  family  discord,  render  athletes 
invincible,  quench  anger  and  violence,  make  one  invisible, 
evoke  images  of  the  gods  and  shades  from  the  infernal  re- 
gions. 

We  have  yet  to  mention  a  group  of  magical  recipes  and  other 

remedies  which  Pliny  for  some  reason  collects  in  one  chap-  "magical 
■'  '■      recipes, 

ter  ^  but  which  hardly  fall  under  any  one  head.  A  whet- 
stone on  which  iron  tools  are  sharpened,  if  placed  without 
his  knowledge  under  the  pillow  of  a  man  who  has  been  poi- 
soned, will  cause  him  to  reveal  all  the  circumstances  of  the 
crime.  If  you  turn  a  man  who  has  been  struck  by  lightning 
over  on  his  injured  side,  he  will  speak  at  once.  To  cure  tu- 
mors in  the  groin,  tie  seven  or  nine  knots  in  the  remnant 
of  a  weaver's  web,  naming  some  widow  as  each  knot  is  tied. 
The  pain  is  assuaged  by  binding  to  the  body  the  nail  that 
has  been  trod  on.  To  get  rid  of  warts,  on  the  twentieth  day 
of  the  moon  lie  flat  in  a  path  gazing  at  the  moon,  stretch  the 
hands  above  the  head  and  rub  the  warts  with  anything  that 
comes  to  hand.  A  corn  may  be  extracted  successfully  at 
the  moment  a  star  shoots.  Headache  may  be  relieved  by  a 
liniment  made  by  pouring  vinegar  on  door  hinges  or  by 
binding  a  hangman's  noose  about  the  patient's  temples.  To 
dislodge  a  fish-bone  stuck  in  the  throat,  plunge  the  feet  into 
cold  water;  to  dislodge  some  other  sort  of  bone,  place  bones 
on  the  head;  to  dislodge  a  morsel  of  bread,  stuff  bits  of 
bread  into  both  ears.  We  may  add  from  a  neighboring 
chapter  a  very  magical  remedy  for  fevers,  although  Pliny 
calls  it  "the  most  modest  of  their  promises."  ^  Toe  and  fin- 
ger nail  parings  mixed  with  wax  are  to  be  attached  ere  sun- 
rise to  another  person's  door  in  order  to  transfer  the  disease 
from  the  patient  to  him.  Or  they  may  be  placed  near  an 
ant-hill,  in  which  case  the  first  ant  who  tries  to  drag  one  in- 

^  XXVIII,   12,  "Magorum  haec  ^  XXVIII,  23. 

commenta  sunt.  .  .  ." 


72 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap: 


Summary 
of  the 
state- 
ments of 
the  magi. 


From  the 
magi    to 
Pliny's 
magic 


side  the  hill  should  be  captured  and  suspended  from  the  pa- 
tient's neck. 

Such  is  the  picture  we  derive  from  numerous  passages  in 
the  Natural  History  of  the  magic  art,  its  materials  and  rites, 
the  effects  it  seeks  to  produce,  and  its  general  attitude 
towards  nature.  Besides  the  natural  materials  employed  and 
the  marvelous  results  sought,  we  have  noted  the  frequent 
use  of  ligatures,  suspensions,  and  amulets,  the  obser\''ance  of 
astrological  conditions,  of  certain  times  and  numbers,  rules 
for  plucking  herbs  and  tying  knots,  stress  on  the  use  of  the 
right  or  left  hand — in  other  words,  on  position  or  direction, 
some  employment  of  incantations,  some  sacrifice  and  fumi- 
gation, some  specimens  of  sympathetic  magic,  of  the  theory 
that  "like  cures  like,"  and  of  other  types  of  magic  logic. 

V.     Pliny's  Magical  Science 

We  may  now  turn  to  the  still  more  numerous  passages  of 
the  Natural  History  where  the  magi  are  not  cited  and  com- 
pare the  virtues  there  ascribed  to  the  things  of  nature  and 
the  methods  employed  in  medicine  and  agriculture  with 
those  of  the  magicians.  We  shall  find  many  striking  resem- 
blances and  shall  soon  come  to  a  realization  that  there  is  more 
magic  in  the  Natural  History  which  is  not  attributed  to  the 
magi  than  there  is  that  is.  Pliny  did  not  need  to  warn  us  that 
medicine  had  been  corrupted  by  magic;  his  own  medicine 
proves  it.  It  is  this  fact,  that  virtually  his  entire  work  is 
crammed  with  marvelous  properties  and  fantastic  ceremo- 
nial, which  makes  it  so  difficult  in  some  places  to  tell  when 
he  begins  to  draw  material  from  the  magi  and  when  he 
leaves  off.  By  a  detailed  analysis  of  this  remaining  mate- 
rial we  shall  now  attempt  to  classify  the  substances  of  which 
Pliny  makes  use  and  the  virtues  which  he  ascribes  to  them, 
the  rites  and  methods  of  procedure  by  which  they  are  em- 
ployed, and  certain  superstitious  doctrines  and  notions 
which  are  involved.  We  shall  thus  find  that  almost  pre- 
cisely the  same  factors  are  present  in  his  science  as  in  the 
lore  of  the  magicians. 


PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY 


73 


Of  substances  we  may  begin  with  animals/  and,  before 


Habits  of 


we  note  the  human  use  of  their  virtues  with  its  strong  sug-  animals, 
gestion  of  magic,  may  remark  another  unscientific  and  su- 
perstitious feature  which  was  very  common  both  in  ancient 
and  medieval  times.  This  is  the  tendency  to  humanize  ani- 
mals, ascribing  to  them  conscious  motives,  habits,  and  ruses, 
or  even  moral  standards  and  religious  veneration.  We  shall 
have  occasion  to  note  the  same  thing  in  other  authors  and 
so  will  give  but  a  few  specimens  from  the  many  in  the  Nat- 
ural History.  Such  qualities  are  attributed  by  Pliny  espe- 
cially to  elephants,  whom  he  ranks  next  to  man  in  intelli- 
gence, and  whom  he  represents  as  worshiping  the  stars, 
learning  difficult  tricks,  and  as  having  a  sense  of  justice,  feel- 


*  Some  works  upon  animals  in 
antiquity  and  Greece  are : 

Aubert  und  Wimmer,  Aristo- 
teles  Thierkunde,  2  vols.,  Leipzig, 
1868. 

Baethgen,  De  vi  et  signiUcatione 
gain  in  religione  ct  artibus 
Graecorum  et  Romanorum,  Diss. 
Inaug.,   Gottingen,    1887. 

Bernays,  Theophrasts  Schrift 
liber  Frommigkeit. 

Bikelas,  O.,  La  nomenclature  de 
la  Faune  grecque,  Paris,  1879. 

Billerbeck,  De  locis  nonnullis 
Arist.  Hist.  Animal.  difUcilioribus , 
Hildesheim,  1806. 

Dryoff,  A.,  Die  Tierpsychologie 
des  Plutarchs,  Progr.  Wiirzburg, 
1897.  tJber  die  stoische  Tierpsy- 
chologie, in  Bl.  f.  bayr.  Gymn.,  23 
(1897)  399ff.;  34  (1898)  416. 

Erhard,  Fauna  der  Cykladen, 
Leipzig,  1858. 

Fowler,  W.  W.,  A  Year  with 
the  Birds,  1895. 

Hopf,  L.,  Thierorakel  und  Ora- 
kelthiere  in  alter  und  ncucr  Zeit, 
Stuttgart,  1888. 

Hopfner,  T.,  Der  Tierkult  der 
alten  ALgypter  nach  den  griech- 
isch-romischen  Berichten  und 
den  unchtigen  Denkmdlcrn,  in 
Denkschr.  d.  Akad.  Wien,  1913, 
ii  Abh. 

Imhoof-Blumer,  F.,  und  Keller, 
O.,  Tier-  und  Pilansenbilder  auf 
Miinscn  und  Gcmmcn  des  klas- 
sischen      Altertums.       illustrated, 


Keller,    O.,    Thiere    des    class. 

Altertums. 

Kriiper,  Zeit  en  des  Gehens  und 
Kommens  und  des  Briitens  der 
Vogel  in  Griechenland  und  lonien, 
in  Mommsen's  Griech.  Jahrcssei- 
tcn,  1875. 

Kiister,  E.,  Die  Schlange  in  der 
griechischen  Kunst  und  Religion, 
Giessen,  1913. 

Lebour,  Zoologist,  1866. 

Lewysohn,  Zoologie  des  Tal- 
mud s. 

Lindermayer,  A.,  Die  Vogel 
Griechenlands,   Passau,   i860. 

Locard,  Histoire  des  mollusques 
dans  I'antiquite,  Lyon,   1884. 

Lorenz,  Die  Taube  im  Alter- 
thutne,  1886. 

Marx,  A.,  Griech.  Mdrchen  von 
dankbaren  Tieren,  Stuttgart,  1889, 

Miihle,  H.  v.  d.,  Beitrdge  sur 
Ornithologie  Griechenlands,  Leip- 
zig, 1844. 

Sundevall,  Thierarten  des  Aris- 
toteles,  Stockholm,  1863. 

Thompson,  D'Arcy  W.,  A  Glos- 
sary of  Greek  Birds,  1895.  Aris- 
totle as  a  Biologist,  1913.  Also 
the  notes  to  his  translation  of  the 
Historia  animalium. 

Westermarck,  E.,  The  Origin 
and  Development  of  Moral  Ideas, 
I  (1906)  251-60,  gives  further 
bibliography  on  the  subjects  of 
animals  as  witnesses  and  the  pun- 
i:.hment  of  animal  culprits. 


■      74  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

ing  of  mercy,  and  so  on.^  Similarly  the  lion  has  noble  cour- 
age and  a  sense  of  gratitude,  while  the  lioness  is  wily  in  the 
devices  by  which  she  conceals  her  amours  with  the  pard.^ 
A  number  of  the  devices  of  fishes  to  escape  hooks  and  nets 
are  repeated  by  Pliny  from  Ovid's  Haliciiticon,  extant 
only  in  fragments.^  The  crocodile  opens  its  jaws  to  have 
its  teeth  picked  by  a  friendly  bird ;  but  sometimes  while  this 
operation  is  being  performed  the  ichneumon  "darts  down  its 
throat  like  a  javelin  and  eats  away  its  intestines."*  Pliny 
also  marvels  at  the  cleverness  displayed  by  the  dragon  and 
the  elephant  in  their  combats  with  one  another,^  which,  how- 
ever, almost  invariably  terminate  fatally  to  both  combatants, 
the  elephant  falling  exhausted  in  the  dragon's  coils  and 
crushing  the  serpent  by  its  weight.  Others  say  that  in  the 
hot  summer  the  dragons  thirst  for  the  blood  of  the  elephant 
which  is  very  cold ;  in  their  combat  the  elephant  falls  drained 
of  its  blood  and  crushes  the  dragon  who  is  intoxicated  by 
the  same. 
Remedies  The  dragon's  apparent  knowledge  that  the  elephant  is 

b'^anhnal*^  cold-blooded  leads  us  to  a  kindred  topic,  the  remedies  used 
by  animals  and  often  discovered  by  men  only  by  seeing  ani- 
mals use  them.  This  notion  continued  in  the  middle  ages, 
as  we  shall  see,  and  of  course  it  did  not  originate  with  Pliny. 
As  he  says  himself,  "The  ancients  have  recorded  the  reme- 
dies of  wild  beasts  and  shown  how  they  are  healed  even  when 
poisoned."  ^  Against  aconite  the  scorpion  eats  white  helle- 
bore as  an  antidote,  while  the  panther  employs  human  ex- 
crement.'^ Animals  prepare  themselves  for  combats  with 
poisonous  snakes  by  eating  certain  herbs;  the  weasel  eats 
rue,  the  tortoise  and  deer  use  two  other  plants,  while  field 
mice  who  have  been  stung  by  snakes  eat  condrion.^  The 
hawk  tears  open  the  hawkweed  and  sprinkles  its  eyes  with 
the  juice.^     The  serpent  tastes  fennel  when  it  sheds  its  old 

»VIII,  I-I2.  *  XXVII,  2;  XVIII,  I. 

»VIII,  17-21.  ''XXVII,  2;  VIII,  41- 

^  XXXII,  S.  "XX,  51  and  61;  XXII,  37  and 

*  VIII,  37.  45. 

"VIII,  11-12.  "XX,  26. 


II 


PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY 


75 


of  ani- 
mals. 


skin,^  Sick  bears  cure  themselves  by  a  diet  of  ants.^  Swal- 
lows restore  the  sight  of  their  young  with  chelidonia  or  swal- 
low-wort,^ and  the  historian  Xanthus  says  that  the  dragon 
restores  its  dead  offspring  to  life  with  an  herb  called  balis^ 
The  hippopotamus  was  the  original  discoverer  of  bleeding,^ 
opening  a  vein  in  his  leg  by  wounding  himself  on  sharp  reeds 
along  the  shore,  and  afterwards  checking  the  flow  of  blood 
by  plastering  the  place  with  mud.^  Pliny,  however,  states 
in  one  passage  that  animals  hit  upon  all  these  remedies  by 
chance  and  even  have  to  rediscover  them  by  accident  in  each 
new  case,  "since,"  he  continues  in  conformity  with  recent 
animal  psychologists,  "reason  and  practice  cannot  be  trans- 
mitted between  wild  beasts."  '^ 

Yet  in  another  passage  Pliny  deplores  the  spite  fulness  jealousy 
of  the  dog  which,  while  men  are  looking,  will  not  pluck  the 
herb  by  which  it  cures  itself  of  snakebite.^  Probably  Pliny 
is  using  different  authorities  in  the  two  passages.  Theo- 
phrastus,  the  pupil  of  Aristotle,  had  written  a  work  on 
Jealous  Animals.  More  excusable  than  the  spitefulness  of 
the  dog  is  the  attitude  of  the  dragon,  from  whose  brain  the 
gem  draconitis  must  be  taken  while  the  dragon  is  alive  and 
preferably  asleep.  For  if  the  dragon  feels  that  it  is  mor- 
tally wounded,  it  takes  revenge  by  spoiling  the  gem.^  Ele- 
phants know  that  men  hunt  them  only  for  their  tusks,  and 
so  bury  these  when  they  fall  ofif.^° 

Animals  have  marvelous  virtues  of  their  own  other  than 
the  medicinal  uses  to  which  men  have  put  them.  For  in- 
stance, the  mere  glance  of  the  basilisk  is  fatal,  and  its  breath 
burns  up  vegetation  and  breaks  rocks. ^^  But  the  medicinal 
effects  which  Pliny  ascribes  to  animals  and  parts  of  animals 

'VIII,  41;  XX,  95. 
'XXIX,  39. 
•XXV,  50. 


Occult 
virtues  of 
animals. 


*XXV,  5. 

^  VIII,  40;  XXVIII,  31. 

°  For  further  remedies  used  by 
animals  see  VIII,  41 ;  XXIX,  14, 
38;  XXV,  52-53;  XXVIII,  81. 

'  XXVII,  2.  ".  .  .  quod  certe 
casu  repertum  quis  dubitet  et  quo- 


tiens  fiat  etiam  nunc  ut  novom 
nasci  quoniam  feris  ratio  et  usus 
inter  se  tradi  non  possit?"  Per- 
haps Pliny  would  have  denied  the 
inheritance  of  acquired  character- 
istics. 


XXV,  51. 
'  XXXVII, 
"VIII,  4. 
'  VIII,  33. 


57. 


76  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

are  well  nigh  infinite.  Many  animal  substances  will  have  to 
be  introduced  in  other  connections  so  that  we  need  mention 
now  but  a  very  few :  the  heads  and  blood  of  flies,  honey  in 
which  bees  have  died,  cinere  genitalis  asini,  chicks  in  the 
t.gg,  and  thrice  seven  centipedes  diluted  with  Attic  honey,^ — 
this  last  a  prescription  for  asthma  and  to  be  taken  through  a 
reed  because  it  blackens  every  dish  by  its  contact.  Another 
passage  advises  eating  a  rat  or  shrew-mouse  in  order  to  bear  a 
baby  with  black  eyes.^  These  items  are  enough  to  convince 
us  that  the  animals  and  parts  of  animals  employed  by  the 
magicians  were  not  one  whit  more  bizarre  and  nauseating 
than  the  others  found  in  the  Natural  History,  nor  were  the 
cures  which  they  were  expected  to  work  any  more  improbable. 
In  order  to  illustrate,  however,  the  delicate  distinctions  which 
were  imagined  to  exist  not  only  between  the  virtues  of  dif- 
ferent parts  of  the  same  animal,  but  also  between  slightly 
varied  uses  of  the  same  part,  we  may  note  that  scales 
scraped  from  the  topmost  part  of  a  tortoise's  shell  and  ad- 
ministered in  drink  check  sexual  desire,  considering  which, 
it  is,  as  Pliny  remarks,  the  more  marvelous  that  a  powder 
made  of  the  entire  shell  is  reported  to  arouse  lust.^  But  love 
turns  readily  to  hatred  in  magic  as  well  as  in  romance,  and 
it  is  nothing  very  unusual,  as  we  shall  find  in  other  authors, 
for  the  same  thing  on  slight  provocation  to  work  in  exactly 
opposite  ways. 
The  Pig  grease,  Pliny  somewhere  informs  us,  possesses  espe- 

he^rbs"  °  cially  strong  virtue,  "because  that  animal  feeds  on  the  roots 
of  herbs."  ^  From  the  virtues  of  animals,  therefore,  let  us 
turn  to  those  of  herbs. ^  Pliny  met  on  every  hand  assertion 
of  their  wonderful  powers.  The  empire-builders  of  Rome 
employed  the  sacred  herbs  sagmina  and  verbenae  in  their  em- 
bassies and  legations.     The  Gauls,  too,  use  the  verbena  in 

^XXIX,     34;     XXX,     10,     19;  theme  is  Joret,  Les  plantes  dans 

XXVIII,   46;    XXIX,    11;    XXX,  /'anfi^Mjf^',  Paris,  1904 ;  see  also  F. 

16.  Mentz,    De   plantis   qiias   ad   rem 

XXX,  46,  magicam   facere   crediderunt   vet- 

* XXXII,   14.  eres,    Leipzig,     1705,    28    pp.;    F. 

*  XXVIII,  27-  Unger,   Die   Pilanze   als   Zauber- 

'A  recent  work  on  the  general  mittel,  Vienna,  1859. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  77 

lot-casting  and  prophetic  responses.^     Pliny  also  states  more 
sceptically  that  there  is  another  root  which  diviners  take  in 
drink  in  order  to  feign  inspiration.^     The  Scythians  know  of 
a  plant  which  prevents  hunger  and  thirst  if  held  in  the  mouth, 
and  of  another  which  has  the  same  effect  upon  their  horses, 
so  that  they  can  go  for  twelve  days  without  meat  or  drink, ^ 
— an  exaggerated  estimate  of  the  hardihood  of  the  mounted 
Asiatic  nomads  and  their  steeds.     Musaeus  and  Hesiod  say 
that  one  anointed  with  potion  will  attain  fame  and  dignities.* 
Pliny  perhaps  did  not  intend  to  subscribe  fully  to  such 
statements,  although  he  cannot  be  said  to  call  many  of  them 
into  question.     He  did  complain  that  some  writers  had  as- 
serted incredible  powers  of  herbs,  such  as  to  restore  dragons 
or  men  to  life  or  withdraw  wedges  from  trees, ^  yet  he  seems 
on  the  whole  in  sympathy  with  the  opinion  of  the  majority 
that  there  is  practically  nothing  which  the  force  of  herbs 
cannot  accomplish.    Herophilus,  illustrious  in  medicine,  had 
said  that  certain  herbs  were  beneficial  if  merely  trod  upon, 
and  Pliny  himself  says  the  same  of  more  than  one  plant.    He 
tells  us  further  that  binding  the  wild  fig  tree  about  their 
necks  makes  the  fiercest  bulls  stand  immobile ;  ^  that  another 
plant  subjects  fractious  beasts  of  burden  to  the  yoke ;  '  while 
cows  who  eat  buprestis  burst  asunder.^    Another  herb  con- 
tacto  genitali  kills  any  female  animal.®    Betony  is  considered 
an  amulet  for  houses, ^°  and  fishermen  in  Pliny's  neighbor- 
hood mix  a  plant  with  chalk  and  scatter  it  on  the  waves.  ^'^ 
"The  fish  dart  towards  it  with  marvelous  desire  and  straight- 
way float  lifeless  on  the  surface."     Dogs  will  not  bark  at 
persons  carrying  peristereos}^     The  "impious  plant"  pre- 
vents any  human  being  who  tastes  it  from  having  quinsy, 
while  swine  are  sure  to  have  that  disease  if  they  do  not  eat  it. 

^  XXII,  3 ;  XXV,  59 ;  XXVII,  28.  '  XXIII,  64. 

'  XXI,  105.    "Halicacabi  radicem  '  XXV,  35- 

bibunt  qui  vaticinari  gallantesque  '  XXII,  36. 

vere    ad    confirmandas    superstiti-  "  XXIV,  94. 

ones  aspici  se  volunt."  "  XXV,  46. 

'  XXV,  43-44-  "  XXV,  54. 

*XXI,  21,  84.  "XXV.  78. 

"XXV,  5 


78  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

Some  place  it  in  birds'  nests  to  prevent  the  voracious  nest- 
lings from  strangling.  Bitter  almonds  provide  another 
amusing  combination  of  effects.  Eating  five  of  them  per- 
mits one  to  drink  without  experiencing  intoxication,  but  if 
foxes  eat  them  they  will  die  unless  they  find  water  near  by 
to  drink. ^  There  are  some  herbs  which  have  a  medicinal 
effect,  if  one  merely  looks  at  them.-  In  two  cases  the 
masculine  or  feminine  variety  of  a  herb  is  used  to  secure 
the  birth  of  a  child  of  the  desired  sex.^ 
Plucking  That  the  plucking  of  herbs  and  digging  up  of  roots  was 

a  process  very  apt  to  be  attended  by  magical  procedure  we 
find  abundant  evidence  in  the  Natural  History.  Often 
plants  should  be  plucked  before  sunrise.^  Twice  Pliny  tells 
us  that  the  peony  should  be  uprooted  by  night  lest  the  wood- 
pecker of  Mars  try  to  pick  the  digger's  eyes  out.^  The 
state  of  the  moon  is  another  point  to  be  observed,*  and 
once  an  herb  is  to  be  gathered  before  thunder  is  heard.'^  A 
common  instruction  is  to  pick  the  plant  with  the  left  hand,^ 
and  once  with  the  thumb  and  fourth  finger  of  the  left  hand.^ 
Once  the  right  hand  should  be  stretched  covertly  after  the 
fashion  of  a  pickpocket  through  the  left  sleeve  in  order  to 
pluck  the  plant.  ^'^  Sometimes  one  faces  east  in  plucking 
herbs ;  sometimes,  west ;  again  one  is  careful  not  to  face  the 
wind.^^  Sometimes  the  gatherer  must  not  glance  behind  liim. 
Sometimes  he  must  fast  before  he  takes  the  plant  from  the 
ground;^-  again  he  must  observe  a  state  of  chastity.^^ 
Sometimes  he  should  be  barefoot  and  clothed  in  white; 
again  he  should  remove  every^  stitch  of  clothing  and  even  his 
rings. ^"*  Sometimes  the  use  of  iron  implements  is  forbidden ; 
again  gold  or  some  other  material  is  prescribed ;  ^^  once  the 
herb  is  to  be  dug  with  a  nail.^*'   Sometimes  circles  are  traced 

*  XXIII.  7S.  =  XXIII,  59. 

"XXIV,  56-57.  ^^XXIV,  62. 

•XXV,  18;  XXVII,  100.  "XXV    'I    04 

^XX.  14;  XXIV,  82;  XXV,  92.  -XXIV  ~63  and  118. 

'XXV.   10;   XXVII,  60.  "XXI    19 

;^,^,(V'  6.  93.  "XXIV,  62;  XXIII,  59- 

'XX,  49:  XXI,  83:  XXIII,  54;  ">^^"I'  8^;  XXIV.  6.  62,  116. 

XXIV,  63;  XXV,  59;  XXVI,  12.  "XXVI.   12. 


Ti  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  79 

about  the  plant  with  the  point  of  a  sword. ^  Often  the 
plant  must  not  touch  the  ground  again  after  it  is  picked,^ 
presumably  from  a  fear  that  its  virtue  would  run  ofT  like  an 
electric  current.  Pliny  alludes  at  least  three  times  ^  to  the 
practice  of  herbalists  of  retaining  portions  of  the  herbs 
they  sell,  and  then,  if  they  are  not  paid  in  full,  replanting 
the  herb  in  the  same  spot  with  the  idea  that  thereby  the  dis- 
ease will  return  to  plague  the  delinquent  patient.  Fre- 
quently one  is  directed  to  state  why  one  plucks  the  herb  or 
for  whom  it  is  intended.'*  In  one  case  the  digger  says, 
"This  is  the  herb  Argemon  which  Minerva  discovered  was 
a  remedy  for  swine  who  taste  it."  ^  In  another  case  one 
should  salute  the  plant  and  extract  its  juice  before  saying  a 
word ;  thus  its  virtue  will  be  much  greater.^  In  other  cases, 
as  an  offering  to  appease  the  earth,  the  soil  about  the  plant 
is  soaked  with  hydromel  three  months  before  plucking  it, 
or  the  hole  left  by  pulling  it  up  is  filled  with  different  kinds 
of  grain.''  Sometimes  one  sacrifices  beforehand  with  bread 
and  wine  or  prays  to  the  gods  for  permission  to  gather  the 
herb.^  The  customs  of  the  Druids  in  gathering  herbs  are 
mentioned  more  than  once.^  In  gathering  the  sacred  mis- 
tletoe on  the  sixth  day  of  the  moon  they  hold  sacrifices  and 
a  banquet  beneath  the  tree.-^*'  Two  white  bulls  are  the  vic- 
tims ;  a  priest  clad  in  white  cuts  the  mistletoe  with  a  golden 
sickle  and  receives  it  in  a  white  cloak. ^^ 

To  Pliny's  discussion  of  herbs  we  may  append  some  Agri- 
specimens  of  the  employment  of  magic  procedure  in  agri-  magic. 
culture  and  of  the  superstitions  of  the  peasantry  in  which 
his  pages  abound.     To  guard  against  diseases  of  grain  the 
seeds  before  planting  should  be  steeped  in  wine,  the  juice 
of  a  certain  herb,  the  gall  of  a  cow,  or  human  urine,  or 

^  XXI.  19;  XXV,  21,  94.  « XXV,  92. 

xxvn"'-^  ^''   ^''    ^^^^'   ^'       '^^^'  '9=  ^^^'  "• 

'XXI,  83;  XXV,   109;  XXVI,         [XXIV,  62;  XXV,  21. 
12.  "XXIV,   62-63. 

*XXII,  16;  XXIII,  54;  XXIV,  "XVI,  95. 

82;  XXVII,  113.  "See     XXIV,     6,     for     other 

"XXIV,   116.  methods  of  plucking  the  mistletoe. 


8o  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap.^ 

should  be  touched  with  the  shoulders  of  a  mole  ^ — the  ani- 
mal whose  use  by  the  magi  we  heard  Pliny  ridicule.  One 
should  sow  at  the  moon's  conjunction.  Before  the  field 
is  hoed,  a  frog  should  be  carried  around  it  and  then  buried 
in  the  center  in  an  earthen  vessel.  But  it  should  be  disin- 
terred before  harvest  lest  the  millet  be  bitter.  Birds  may 
be  kept  away  from  the  grain  by  planting  in  the  four  cor- 
ners of  the  field  an  herb  whose  name  is  unfortunately  un- 
known to  Pliny. ^  Mice  are  kept  out  by  the  ashes  of  a 
weasel,  mildew  by  laurel  branches,  caterpillars  by  placing 
the  skull  of  a  female  beast  of  burden  upon  a  stick  in  the 
garden.^  To  ward  off  fogs  and  storms  from  orchards  and 
vineyards  a  frog  may  be  buried  as  directed  above,  or  live 
crabs  may  be  burnt  in  the  trees,  or  a  painted  grape  may  be 
consecrated.'*  Suspending  a  frog  in  the  granary  preserves 
the  corn  stored  there.^  To  keep  wolves  away  catch  one, 
break  its  legs,  attach  it  to  the  ploughshare,  and  thus  scatter 
its  blood  about  the  boundaries  of  the  field;  then  bury  the 
carcass  at  the  starting-point.®  Or  consecrate  at  the  altar 
of  the  Lar  the  ploughshare  with  which  the  first  furrow  was 
traced.  Foxes  will  not  touch  poultry  who  have  eaten  the 
dried  liver  of  a  fox  or  who  wear  a  bit  of  its  skin  about 
their  necks.  Fern  will  not  spring  up  again  if  it  is  mowed 
with  the  edge  of  a  reed  or  uprooted  by  a  ploughshare  upon 
which  a  reed  has  been  placed.''^  Of  the  use  of  incantations 
in  agriculture  we  shall  treat  later. 
Virtues  Pliny  appears  to  have  much  less  faith  in  the  possession 

of  marvelous  virtues  by  gems  than  by  herbs  and  parts  of  ani- 
mals. He  not  only  characterizes  the  powers  attributed  to 
gems  by  the  magi  and  Democritus  and  Pythagoras  as  "ter- 
rible lies"  and  "unspeakable  nonsense" ;  ^  but  refrains  from 
mentioning  many  such  himself  or  inserts  a  cautious  "if 
we  believe  it"  or  "if  they  tell  the  truth."  ^     Of  the  gem 

'XVIII,  45.  "  XXVIII,  81. 

*  See  also  XXV,  6.  1  yvtTT    R 

a  YTV       i-Q  ' 

*xviii  70  "  XXXVII,  14,  73. 

'XVIII.  73.  •  XXXVII,  55-56. 


metals. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  8i 

supposed  to  be  produced  from  the  urine  of  the  lynx 
he  says,  "I  think  that  this  is  quite  false  and  no  gem  of  that 
name  has  been  seen  in  our  time.  What  is  stated  concerning 
its  medicinal  virtue  is  also  false."  ^  To  other  stones,  how- 
ever, he  ascribes  various  medicinal  virtues,  either  when 
taken  pulverized  in  drink  or  when  worn  as  amulets.^  A  few 
other  occult  properties  are  stated  without  reservation,  as 
that  amiantus  resists  all  sorceries,^  that  adamant  expels  idle 
fears  from  the  mind,  that  'sideritis  produces  discord  and 
litigation,  and  that  eumeces,  placed  beneath  one's  pillow  at 
night,  causes  oracular  visions."*  Magnets  are  said  to  differ 
in  sex,  and  the  belief  of  Theophrastus  and  Mucianus.is  re- 
peated that  certain  stones  bear  offspring.^ 

Of  the  metals  iron  sometimes  figures  in  Pliny's  magical  0*1^^^ 

_  °  •'  °     ,      minerals 

procedure,  as  when  he  either  prescribes  or  taboos  the  use  of  it  and 
in  cutting  herbs  or  killing  animals.  In  Arcadia  the  yew-tree 
is  a  fatal  poison  to  persons  sleeping  beneath  it,  but  driving 
a  copper  nail  into  the  tree  makes  it  harmless.®  Pliny  says 
that  gold  is  medicinal  in  many  ways  and  in  particular  is 
applied  to  wounded  persons  and  to  infants  as  a  safeguard 
against  witchcraft.'^  Earth  itself  is  often  used  to  work 
marvels,  but  usually  some  particular  portion,  such  as  that 
between  cart  ruts  or  that  thrown  up  by  ants,  beetles,  and 
moles,  or  in  the  right  footprint  where  one  first  heard  a 
cuckoo  sing.^  However,  the  rule  that  an  object  should  not 
touch  the  ground  is  enforced  in  many  other  connections  ^ 
than  the  plucking  of  herbs,  and  Pliny  twice  states  that  the 
earth  will  not  permit  a  serpent  who  has  stung  a  human  be- 
ing to  re-enter  its  hole.^°  In  his  discussion  of  metals  Pliny 
does  not  allude  to  transmutation  or  alchemy,  unless  it  be  in 
his  accounts  of  various  fraudulent  practices  of  workers  in 
metal  and  how  Caligula  extracted  gold  from  orpiment.  But 
the  following  directions  for  preparing  antimony   show  how 

'XXXVII,  13.  'XXXVI,  25,  39. 

'For     instance,     XXXVII,  12  'XVI,  20. 

amber,    37   jasper,    39   aetites,  55  '  XXXIII,  25. 

"baroptenus."  '  XXX,   12,  25. 

•XXXVI,  31.  "XX,  3;  XXVIII,  6,  9;  etc. 

♦XXXVII,    IS.   58,  67.  "II,  63;  XXIX,  23. 


82 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Virtues  of 

human 

parts. 


Virtues  of 

human 

saliva. 


closely  akin  to  magic  the  procedure  in  ancient  metallurgy 
might  be.  The  antimony  should  be  coated  with  cow-flap 
and  burnt  in  furnaces,  then  quenched  in  woman's  milk  and 
pounded  in  mortars  with  an  admixture  of  rain-water.^ 

Various  parts  and  products  of  the  human  body  are 
credited  with  remarkable  virtues  as  the  mention  just  made 
of  woman's  milk  suggests.  Other  passages  recommend 
more  especially  the  milk  of  a  woman  just  delivered  of  a 
male  child,  but  most  of  all  that  of  the  mother  of  twins.^ 
Sed  nihil  facile  reperiatur  mulierimi  profluvio  magis  mon- 
strificum,  as  Pliny  proceeds  to  illustrate  by  numerous  ex- 
amples.^ Great  virtues  are  also  attributed  to  the  urine,  par- 
ticularly of  a  chaste  boy.*  A  few  other  instances  of  rem- 
edies drawn  from  the  human  body  are  ear-wax  or  a  pow- 
dered tooth  against  stings  of  scorpions  and  bites  of  snakes,^ 
a  man's  hair  for  the  bite  of  a  dog,  the  first  hairs  from  a 
boy's  head  for  gout.®  Diseases  of  women  are  prevented  by 
wearing  constantly  in  a  bracelet  the  first  tooth  a  boy  loses, 
provided  it  has  not  touched  the  ground.  Simply  tying  two 
fingers  or  toes  together  is  recommended  for  tumors  in  the 
groin,  catarrh,  and  sore  eyes.'^  Or  the  eyes  may  be  touched 
thrice  with  water  in  which  the  feet  have  been  washed. 
Scrofula  and  throat  diseases  may  be  cured  by  the  touch  of 
the  hand  of  one  who  has  died  an  early  death,  although  some 
authorities  do  not  insist  upon  the  circumstance  of  early 
death  but  direct  that  the  corpse  be  of  the  same  sex  as  the 
patient  and  that  the  diseased  spot  be  touched  with  the  back 
of  the  left  dead  hand. 

Of  all  fluids  and  excretions  of  the  human  body  the  saliva 
is  perhaps  used  most  often  in  ancient  and  medieval  medicine, 
as  the  custom  of  spitting  once  or  thrice  in  administering  other 
remedies  or  performing  ceremonies  goes  to  prove.  The 
spittle  of  a  fasting  person  is  the  more  efficacious.  In  a 
chapter  devoted   particularly  to   the   properties  of  human 

*  XXXIII,  34-  18-19. 

»XX,  51;  XXVIII,  21.  ^  XXVIII,   8. 

•VII,  13;  XXVIII,  23.  'XXVIII,   9- 

*XX,  Z2\   XXII,   30;   XXVIII,  'XXVIII,  9-11. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  83 

saliva  Pliny  lists  many  diseases  and  woes  which  it  allevi- 
ates.^ In  this  connection  he  makes  the  following  absurd 
assertion  which  he  nevertheless  declares  is  easily  tested  by 
experiment.  "If  a  person  repents  of  a  blow  given  from  a 
distance  or  hand-to-hand,  let  him  spit  into  the  palm  of  the 
hand  with  which  he  struck,  and  the  person  who  has  been 
struck  will  feel  no  resentment.  This  is  often  proved  by 
beasts  of  burden  who  are  induced  to  mend  their  pace  by 
this  method  after  the  use  of  the  whip  has  failed."  Pliny 
adds,  however,  that  some  persons  try  to  increase  the  force 
of  their  blows  by  thus  spitting  on  the  hands  beforehand. 
He  also  mentions  as  counter-charms  against  sorcery  the 
practices  of  spitting  into  one's  urine  or  right  shoe,  or  when 
crossing  a  dangerous  spot. 

The  importance  of  the  human  operator  as  a  factor  in  The 
the  performance  of  marvels,  be  they  medical  or  magical,  is  operator, 
attested  by  the  frequent  injunctions  of  chastity,  virginity, 
nudity,  or  a  state  of  fasting  upon  persons  concerned  in 
Pliny's  procedure.  Sometimes  they  are  not  to  glance  be- 
hind them,  sometimes  they  are  to  speak  to  no  one  during 
the  operation.  Pliny  also  mentions  men  who  have  a  special 
capacity  for  wonder-working,  such  as  Pyrrhus,  the  touch  of 
whose  toe  had  healing  power,^  those  whose  eyes  exert  strong 
fascination,  whole  tribes  of  serpent-charmers  and  venom- 
curers,  and  others  whose  mere  presence  addles  the  eggs  be- 
neath a  setting  hen.^  The  power  of  words  spoken  by  men 
will  be  considered  separately  under  the  head  of  incantations. 

While  Pliny  attributes  the  most  extreme  medicinal  vir-  Absence  of 
tues  to  simples,  he  excludes  from  his  Natural  History  the  ^^-^^ 
strange  and  elaborate  compounds  which  were  nevertheless  pounds, 
so  popular  in  the  pharmacy  of  his  age.     Of  one  simple, 
laser,  he  says  that  it  would  be  an  immense  task  to  attempt 
to  list  all  the  uses  that  it  is  supposed  to  have  in  compounds.* 
His  position  is  that  the  simple  remedies  alone  are  the  direct 
work  of  nature,  while  the  mixtures,  tablets,  pills,  plasters, 

*  XXVIII,  7.  "  XXVIII,  6. 

*VII,  2.  "XXII,  49. 


84 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Sympa- 
thetic 
magic. 


Antipa- 
thies 
between 
animals. 


washes  are  artificial  inventions  of  the  apothecaries.  Once 
when  he  describes  a  compound  called  "Hermesias"  which 
aids  in  the  generation  of  good  and  beautiful  children,  it 
seems  to  be  borrowed  by  Democritus  from  the  magi}  Fur- 
thermore, Pliny  thinks  that  health  can  be  sufficiently  pre- 
served or  restored  by  nature's  simple  remedies.  Com- 
pounds are  the  invention  of  human  conjecture,  avarice,  and 
impudence.  Such  conjecture  is  often  false,  not  sufficiently 
taking  into  account  the  natural  sympathies  and  antipathies 
of  the  numerous  ingredients.  Often  compounds  are  inex- 
plicable. Pliny  also  deplores  resort  to  imported  drugs  from 
India,  Arabia,  and  the  Red  Sea,  when  there  are  homely 
remedies  at  hand  for  the  poorest  man.^ 

We  have  just  heard  Pliny  refer  to  the  sympathies  and 
antipathies  of  natural  simples,  and  he  often  explains  the 
marvelous  effects  of  natural  objects  upon  one  another  by 
this  relation  of  love  and  hatred,  friendship  or  repugnance, 
discord  or  concord  which  exists  between  them,  which  the 
Greeks  call  sympathy  or  antipathy,  and  which  Heracleitus 
was  perhaps  the  first  philosopher  to  insist  upon.^  Some 
modern  students  of  magic  have  tried  to  account  for  all  magic 
on  this  theory,  and  Pliny  states  that  medicine  and  medicines 
originated  from  it.* 

This  relationship  exists  between  animals, — deer  and 
snakes,  for  example.  So  great  a  force  is  it  that  stags  track 
snakes  to  their  holes  and  extract  them  thence  despite  all 
resistance  by  the  power  of  their  breath.  This  antipathy 
continues  after  death,  for  the  sovereign  remedy  for  snake- 
bite is  the  rennet  of  a  fawn  killed  in  its  mother's  womb, 
while  serpents  flee  from  a  man  who  wears  the  tooth  of  a 
deer.  But  antipathy  may  change  to  sympathy,  for  Pliny 
adds  that  in  some  cases  certain  parts  of  deer  treated  in  cer- 
tain ways  attract  serpents.^     This  force  of  antipathy  is  in- 


*XXIV,  102. 

'In  this  paragraph  I  have  com- 
bined views  expressed  by  Pliny  in 
three  different  passages :  XXII, 
49  and  56;  XXIV,  i. 


"IX,   88;    XXIV,    i;   XXVIII, 
23;  XXXII,  12;  XXXVII,  15;  etc. 

*XXIV,  i;  XXIX,  17. 

•VIII.  so;  XXVIII.  42. 


II 


PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY 


85 


deed  capable  of  taking  the  strangest  turn.  Bed-bugs,  foul 
and  disgusting  as  they  are,  heal  the  bite  of  snakes,  especially 
asps,  and  sows  can  eat  the  poisonous  salamander.^  The  an- 
tipathy between  goats  and  snakes  would  seem  almost  as 
potent  as  that  between  deer  and  snakes,^  since  we  are  told 
that  snake-bitten  persons  recover  more  quickly,  if  they  fre- 
quent the  stalls  where  goats  are  kept  or  wear  as  an  amulet 
the  paunch  of  a  she-goat. 

There  is  also  "the  hatred  and  friendship  of  deaf  and 
insensible  things."  ^  Instances  are  the  magnet's  attraction 
for  iron  and  the  fact  that  adamant  can  be  broken  only  by 
the  blood  of  a  he-goat,  two  stock  examples  of  occult  influ- 
ence and  natural  marvels  which  continued  classic  in  the 
medieval  period.'*  Pliny  indeed  regards  this  last  as  the 
clearest  illustration  possible  of  the  potency  of  sympathy 
and  antipathy,  since  a  substance  which  defies  iron  and  fire, 
nature's  two  most  violent  agents,  yields  to  the  blood  of  a 
foul  animal.^ 

There  is  furthermore  sympathy  and  antipathy  between 
animate  and  inanimate  objects.  So  marvelous  is  the  antip- 
athy of  the  tamarisk  tree  for  the  spleen  alone  of  internal 
organs,  that  pigs  who  drink  from  troughs  of  this  wood  are 
found  when  slaughtered  to  be  without  spleen,  and  hence 
splenetic  patients  are  fed  from  vessels  of  tamarisk.^  The 
spleenless  pig,  it  may  be  interpolated,  is  another  common- 
place of  ancient  and  medieval  science.  Smearing  the  hives 
with  cow  dung  kills  other  insects  but  stimulates  the  bees 
who  have  an  affinity  for  it  {cognatmn  hoc  iis),'^  probably, 
although  Pliny  does  not  say  so,  on  the  theory  that  they  are 


'XXIX,  17  and  23. 

'XXVIII,  43- 

*XX,  I.  "Odia  amicitiaque  re- 
rum  surdarum  ac  sensu  carentium 
.  .  .  quod  Graeci  sympathiam  ap- 
pellavere."  XXIV,  i.  "Surdis 
etiam  rerum  sua  cuique  sunt 
venena  ac  minimis  quoque  .  .  • 
Concordia  valent." 

*  XXVIII,  41;  XXXVII,  15. 
Yet  a  note  in  Bostock  and  Riley's 
translation,  IV,  207,  asserts,  "Pliny 


is  the  only  author  who  makes 
mention  of  this  singularly  absurd 
notion." 

""Nunc  quod  totis  voluminibus 
his  docere  conati  summus  de  dis- 
cordia  rerum  concordiaque  quam 
antipathiam  Graeci  vocavere  ac 
sympathiam  non  aliter  clarius  in- 
telligi  potest." 

"XXIV,  41. 

'XXI,  47. 


Love  and 

hatred 

between 

inanimate 

objects. 


Sympathy 
between 
animate 
and  inani- 
mate ob- 
jects. 


86  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 

spontaneously  generated  from  it.  That  the  wild  cabbage  is 
hostile  to  dogs  is  evidenced  by  the  statement  of  Epicharmus 
that  it  cures  the  bite  of  a  mad  dog  but  kills  a  dog  if  he  eats 
it  when  given  to  him  with  meat.^  Snakes  hate  the  ash-tree 
so,  that  if  they  are  hemmed  in  by  its  foliage  on  one  side  and 
fire  on  the  other,  they  flee  by  preference  into  the  flames.^ 
Betony,  too,  is  so  antipathetic  to  snakes  that  they  lash  them- 
selves to  death  when  a  circle  of  it  is  drawn  about  them.^ 
Scorpions  cannot  survive  in  the  air  of  Sicily.*  Perhaps 
antipathy  is  also  the  explanation  of  Pliny's  absurd  state- 
ment that  loads  of  apples  and  pears,  even  if  there  are  only 
a  few  of  them,  are  very  heavy  for  beasts  of  burden.^  Here, 
however,  the  condition  may  be  remedied  and  perhaps  a  re- 
lationship of  sympathy  established  by  showing  the  beasts 
how  few  fruit  there  really  are  or  by  giving  them  some  to 
eat.  That  sympathy  may  even  attach  to  places  or  religious 
circumstances  Pliny  infers  from  the  belief  that  the  priestess 
of  the  earth  at  Aegira,  when  about  to  descend  into  the  cave 
and  predict,  drinks  without  injury  bull's  blood  which  is  sup- 
posed to  be  a  fatal  poison.^ 
Like  cures  That  like  cures  like,  or  more  precisely  and  paradoxically 

^^^-  that  the  cause  of  the  disease  will  cure  its  own  result,  is  an- 

other notion  which  Pliny's  medicine  shares  with  magic. 
This  is  seen  in  the  use  of  parts  of  the  mad  dog  to  cure  its 
bite,'^  or  in  rubbing  thighs  chafed  by  horse-back  riding  with 
the  foam  from  a  horse's  mouth.®  The  bite  of  the  shrew- 
mouse,  too,  is  best  healed  by  imposition  of  the  very  animal 
which  bit  you,  but  another  shrew-mouse  will  do  and  they 
are  kept  ready  in  oil  and  mud  for  this  purpose.^  The  sting 
of  the  phalangium  may  be  cured  by  merely  looking  at  an- 
other insect  of  that  species,  whether  it  be  dead  or  alive. 

From  cases  in  which  the  cure  for  the  disease  is  identical 
with  its  cause  it  is  but  a  short  step  to  remedies  similar  to 

*XX.  36.  « XXVIII,  41. 

^XVI,  24.  ^xxix,  32. 

'XXV,  55.  "  XXVIII,  61. 

*XXXVII,  54.  "XXIX,  27. 
■^  XXIII,  62;  XXIV.  I. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  87 

or  in  some  way  associated  with  the  ailment.  It  seems  ob- 
vious to  PHny  that  stone  in  the  bladder  can  be  broken  by 
the  herb  on  which  grow  what  look  exactly  like  pearls.  "In 
the  case  of  no  other  herb  is  it  so  evident  for  what  medicine 
it  is  intended;  its  species  is  such  that  it  can  be  recognized 
at  once  by  sight  without  book  knowledge."^  Similarly 
ophites,  a  marble  with  serpentine  streaks,  is  used  as  an  amu- 
let against  snake-bite.^  Mithridates  discovered  that  the 
blood  of  Pontic  ducks  should  be  mixed  in  antidotes  because 
they  live  on  poison.^  Heliotrope  seed  looks  like  a  scorpion's 
tail ;  if  scorpions  are  touched  with  a  sprig  of  heliotrope  they 
die,  and  they  will  not  enter  ground  which  has  been  circum- 
scribed by  it.^  To  accelerate  a  woman's  delivery  her  lover 
should  take  off  his  belt  and  gird  her  with  it,  then  untie  it, 
saying  that  he  has  bound  her  and  will  unloose  her,  and  then 
he  should  go  away.^  An  epileptic  may  be  cured  by  driving 
an  iron  nail  into  the  spot  where  his  head  rested  when  he  fell 
in  the  fit.^ 

Other  instances  of  association  are  when  the  remedy  em-   The  prirv 

ploved  is  some  part  of  an  animal  who  is  free  from  the  disease   '^'P^^  ?^ 
,     -^         .  ^  .  •        associa- 

in  question  or  marked  by  an  opposite  state  of  health.  Goats  tion. 
and  gazelles  never  have  ophthalmia,  hence  various  portions 
of  their  bodies  are  prescribed  for  eye  diseases.'^  Eagles  can 
gaze  at  the  sun,  therefore  their  gall  is  efficacious  in  eye- 
salves.^  The  bird  called  ossifrage  has  a  single  intestine 
which  digests  anything;  the  end  of  this  intestine  serves  as 
an  amulet  against  colic,  and  indigestion  may  be  cured  by 
merely  holding  the  crop  of  the  bird  in  one  hand.^  But  do  not 
hold  it  too  long  or  your  flesh  will  waste  away.  The  virus 
of  mares  is  an  ingredient  in  a  candle  which  makes  heads  of 
horses  seem  to  appear  when  it  burns ;  ^®  while  ink  of  the 
sepia  is  used  in  a  candle  which  causes  Ethiopians  to  be 
seen  when  it  is  lighted.^^   These  magic  candles  are  borrowed 

^  XXVII,  74.  •'XXVIII,  47. 

^  XXXVI,  II.  8  XXIX   38 

^XXIl'io  "  XXX,  20. 

»XXVilf:'9.  "XXVIII,  49. 

•■  XXVIII,  17.  "XXXII,   52. 


88  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap, 

by  Pliny  from  the  works  of  Anaxilaus,  and  we  shall  find 
them  a  feature  of  medieval  collections  of  experiments. 
Earth  from  a  cart-wheel  rut  is  thought  a  remedy  against 
the  bite  of  the  shrew-mouse  because  that  creature  is  too  tor- 
pid to  cross  such  a  rut ;  ^  and  Pliny  believes  that  none  of 
the  virtues  attributed  to  moles  by  the  magicians  is  more 
probable  than  that  they  are  an  antidote  to  the  bite  of  the 
shrew-mouse,  which  shuns  even  ruts,  whereas  moles  burrow 
freely  through  the  soil.^  Pliny  finds  incredible  the  assertion 
made  by  some  that  a  ship  will  move  more  slowly  if  it  has 
the  right  foot  of  a  tortoise  aboard,^  but  the  logic  of  the 
magic  seems  evident  enough. 
Magic  In  Pliny's  medicine  there  are  a  number  of  examples  of 

of  disease,  what  may  be  called  magic  transfer,  in  which  the  aim  of  the 
procedure  is  not  to  cure  the  disease  outright  but  to  rid  the 
patient  of  it  by  transferring  it  from  him  to  some  other  ani- 
mal or  object.  Intestinal  disease  may  be  transferred  to 
puppies  who  have  not  yet  opened  their  eyes  by  pressing  them 
to  the  body  and  giving  them  milk  from  the  patient's  mouth. 
They  will  die  of  the  disease,  when  its  cause  and  exact  nature 
may  be  determined  by  dissecting  them.  But  finally  they 
must  be  buried.*  Griping  pains  in  the  bowels  will  also  pass 
to  a  duck  that  is  held  against  the  abdomen.  One  may  be 
rid  of  a  cough  by  spitting  in  a  frog's  mouth  or  cure  catarrh 
by  kissing  a  mule,^  although  in  these  cases  we  are  left  unin- 
formed whether  the  disease  passes  to  the  animal.  But  if  a 
person  who  has  been  stung  by  a  scorpion  whispers  the  news 
in  the  ear  of  an  ass,  the  ill  will  be  transferred  to  the  ass.® 
A  boil  may  be  removed  by  rubbing  nine  grains  of  barley 
around  it,  each  grain  thrice  with  the  left  hand,  and  then 
throwing  them  all  into  the  fire.^  Warts  are  banished  by 
touching  each  with  a  grain  of  the  chickpea  and  then  tying 
the  grains  up  in  a  linen  cloth  and  throwing  them  behind 
one.^  If  a  root  of  asphodel  is  applied  to  sores  and  then  hung 

*  XXIX,  27.  "  XXXII,  29;  XXX,  II. 

"XXX.  7.  •  XXVIII,  42. 

'XXXII,  14.  'XXII,  65. 

*XXX,  20  and  14.  "  XXII,  72. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  89 

up  in  smoke,  the  sores  will  dry  up  along  with  the  root.^  To 
cure  scrofulous  sores  some  bind  on  as  many  earthworms 
as  there  are  sores  and  let  them  dry  up  together.^  A  tooth 
will  cease  aching  if  the  herb  erigeron  is  dug  up  with  iron 
and  the  patient  thrice  alternately  touches  the  tooth  with 
the  root  and  spits,  and  if  he  then  replaces  the  herb  in  the 
same  spot  and  it  lives. ^  If  this  last  is  a  case  of  magic  trans- 
fer, perhaps  we  may  trace  the  same  notion  in  some  of  the 
numerous  instances  in  which  Pliny  directs  that  an  animal 
shall  be  released  alive  after  some  part  of  it  has  been  removed 
or  some  other  medicinal  use  made  of  it. 

A  common  characteristic  of  magic  force  and  occult  vir-  Amulets, 
tue  is  that  it  will  often  act  at  a  distance  or  without  any 
physical  contact  or  direct  application.  This  is  manifested 
in  the  practice  of  carrying  or  wearing  amulets,  or,  what  is 
the  same  thing,  of  ligatures  and  suspensions,  in  which  ob- 
jects are  hung  from  the  neck  or  bound  to  some  part  of  the 
body  in  order  to  ward  off  danger  from  without  or  cure 
internal  disease.  Instances  of  such  practices  in  the  Natural 
History  are  well  nigh  innumerable.  Roots  are  suspended 
from  the  neck  by  a  thread ;  ^  the  tongue  of  a  fox  is  worn  in 
a  bracelet ;  ^  for  quinsy  the  throat  is  wound  thrice  with  a 
thong  of  dog-skin  and  catarrh  is  relieved  by  winding  the 
same  about  the  fingers.^  A  tooth  stops  aching  when  worms 
are  taken  from  a  certain  prickly  plant,  put  with  some  bread 
in  a  pill-box,  and  bound  to  the  arm  on  the  same  side  of  the 
body  as  the  aching  tooth."^  Two  bed-bugs  bound  to  the  left 
arm  in  wool  stolen  from  shepherds  are  a  charm  against  noc- 
turnal fevers;  against  diurnal  fevers,  if  wrapped  in  russet 
cloth  instead.®  The  heart  of  a  vulture  is  an  amulet  against 
snakes,  wild  beasts,  robbers,  and  royal  wrath.^  The  trav- 
eler who  carries  the  herb  artemisia  feels  no  fatigue.^*'  In- 
jurious drugs  cannot  cross  one's  threshold  and  do  injury  in 

'XXII,  32.  «xxx,    12,    15. 

'XXX,    12.  'XXVII,  62. 

"XXV,   106.  'XXIX,    17. 

*XX,   8r.  "XXIX.  24. 

'XXVIII,  47.  "XXVI.  89. 


90  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 

one's  household,  if  a  sea-star  is  smeared  with  the  blood  of 
a  fox  and  attached  to  the  lintel  or  door-post  with  a  copper 
nail.^  Not  only  is  a  wreath  of  herbs  worn  for  headache,^ 
but  a  sprig  of  poplar  held  in  the  hand  prevents  chafing  be- 
tween the  thighs.^  Often  objects  are  placed  under  one's 
pillow,  especially  for  insomnia,*  but  any  psychological  ef- 
fect is  precluded  in  the  case  where  this  is  to  be  done  without 
the  patient's  knowledge.^  All  sorts  of  specifications  are 
given  as  to  the  color  and  kind  of  string,  cloth,  skin,  box, 
nail,  ring,  bracelet,  and  the  like  in  which  should  be  placed, 
or  with  which  should  be  bound  on,  the  various  gems,  herbs, 
and  parts  of  animals  which  serve  as  amulets.  But  when 
we  are  told  that  a  remedy  for  headache  which  always  helps 
many  consists  of  a  little  bone  from  a  snail  found  between 
two  cart  ruts,  passed  through  gold,  silver,  and  ivory,  and 
attached  to  the  body  with  dog-skin;  or  that  one  may  bind 
on  the  head  with  a  linen  cloth  the  head  of  a  snail  decapitated 
with  a  reed  when  feeding  in  the  morning  especially  at  full 
moon ;  ^  we  feel  that  we  have  passed  beyond  mere  amulets, 
ligatures,  and  suspensions  to  more  elaborate  minutiae  of 
magic  procedure. 
Positioner  Position  or  direction  is  often  an  important  matter  in 
Pliny's,  as  in  magic,  ceremonial.  It  perhaps  comes  out  most 
frequently  in  his  specification  of  right  or  left.  An  aching 
tooth  should  be  scarified  with  the  left  eye-tooth  of  a  dog;  a 
spider  which  is  placed  with  oil  in  the  ear  should  be  caught 
with  the  left  hand;'''  epilepsy  may  be  cured  if  a  virgin 
touches  the  sufferer  with  her  right  thumb ;  ^  for  ophthalmia 
of  the  right  eye  suspend  the  right  eye  of  a  frog  from  the 
patient's  neck,  and  the  left  eye  for  the  left  eye;^  for  lum- 
bago tear  off  an  eagle's  feet  away  from  the  joint,  and  use 
the  right  foot  for  the  right  side  and  the  left  for  pain  in  the 
left  side.^*'     But  we  have  met  other  examples  already,  and 

'XXXII,  i6;  also  XX,  39.  "XXIX,  36. 

'XXII,  30.  'XXX,  8. 

"XXIV,  32,  38.  "  XXVIII,  10. 

*XX,  72,  82.  "  XXXII,  24. 

"XXVI,  69.  '"XXX,  18. 


direction. 


11  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  91 

also  cases  of  the  use  of  the  upper  or  lower  part  of  this  or 
that  according  to  the  corresponding  location  of  an  aching 
tooth  in  the  upper  or  lower  jaw.^  Tracing  circles  with  and 
about  objects,  facing  towards  this  or  that  point  of  the  com- 
pass, the  prohibition  against  glancing  behind  one,  and  the 
stress  laid  upon  finding  things  or  killing  animals  between 
the  ruts  of  cart  wheels,  are  other  examples  of  taking  into 
consideration  position  and  direction  which  we  have  already 
met  with  incidentally  to  the  treatment  of  other  topics.  The 
prescription  of  a  plant  which  has  grown  on  the  head  of  a 
statue  and  of  another  which  has  taken  root  in  a  sieve  thrown 
into  a  hedge  -  also  seem  to  take  mere  position  largely  into 
account,  more  so  than  the  accompanying  recommendation 
of  an  herb  growing  on  the  banks  of  a  stream  and  of  another 
growing  upon  a  dunghill.^ 

The  element  of  time  is  also  important.  Operations  should  '^,^^  **™® 

1  •  element, 

be  performed  before  sunrise,  early  in  the  mornmg,  at  night, 

and  so  on.  The  moon  is  especially  regarded  in  such  direc- 
tions.^ When  we  are  informed  that  sufferers  from  quartan 
fever  should  be  rubbed  all  over  with  the  fat  of  a  tortoise, 
we  are  also  told  that  the  tortoise  will  be  fattest  on  the  fif- 
teenth day  of  the  moon  and  that  the  patient  should  be 
anointed  on  the  sixteenth.^  But  this  waxing  and  waning  of 
the  tortoise  with  the  moon  is  primarily  a  matter  of  astrology 
and  planetary  influence,  under  which  heading  we  shall  also 
later  speak  of  Pliny's  observance  of  the  rising  of  the  dog- 
star. 

Observance  of  number  is  another  feature  in  Pliny's  cere-  Observ- 
monial,  of  which  we  have  already  met  instances.  He  also  n"^ber 
alludes  to  the  writings  of  Pythagoras  on  the  subject  and  as- 
cribes to  Democritus  a  work  on  the  number  four.  Pliny's 
recipes  frequently  recommend  that  the  operation  be  thrice 
repeated.  In  the  case  of  curing  scrofula  by  the  ashes  of 
vipers  he  prescribes  three  fingers  thereof  taken  in  drink  for 

'See  also  XXX,  8.  75,    79;    XXII,    72;    XXIII,    71; 

'XXIV,  106  and  109.  XXVIII,  47;  XXIX,  36;  XXXII, 

^XXIV,   107  and   no.  14,  2^,  38,  46. 

'Some    examples    are:  XVIII,          ° XXXII.   14. 


92 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 


CHAP. 


Relation 

between 

operator 

and 

patient. 


Incanta- 
tions. 


thrice  seven  days.^  In  another  application  of  a  Gallic  herb 
with  old  axle-grease  which  has  not  touched  iron,  not  only 
must  the  patient  spit  thrice  to  the  right,  but  the  remedy  is 
more  efficacious  if  three  men  representing  three  different 
nations  anoint  the  right  side  with  it.^  The  virtue  of  the 
number  one  is  not,  however,  entirely  slighted.  Importance 
is  attached  to  the  death  of  a  stag  from  a  single  wound.^ 
Sometimes  three  and  one  are  joined  in  the  same  operation, 
as  when  child-birth  is  aided  by  hurling  through  the  hoiise 
a  stone  or  weapon  by  which  three  animals,  a  man,  a  boar, 
and  a  bear,  have  been  killed  with  single  blows.  One  of  the 
discoveries  of  Pythagoras  which  seldom  fails  is  that  an  odd 
number  of  vowels  in  a  child's  given  name  portends  lame- 
ness, blindness,  and  like  incapacitation  on  the  right  side  of 
its  body,  and  an  even  number,  injuries  on  the  left  side.'* 
In  a  crown  of  smilax  for  headache  there  should  be  an  odd 
number  of  leaves,^  and  in  a  diet  of  snails  prescribed  for 
stomach  trouble  an  odd  number  are  to  be  eaten. ^  For  a 
head-wash  ten  green  lizards  are  boiled  in  ten  sextarii  of 
oil,"^  and  for  an  application  to  prevent  eyelashes  from  grow- 
ing again  when  they  have  been  pulled  out  fifteen  frogs  are 
impaled  on  fifteen  bulrushes.^  The  person  who  has  tied  on 
a  certain  amulet  is  thereafter  excluded  from  the  patient's 
sight  for  five  days.^     And  so  on. 

This  last  item  suggests  a  further  intangible  factor  in 
Pliny's  procedure,  the  doing  of  things  to  or  for  the  patient 
without  his  knowledge.  But  this  and  any  other  incorporeal 
relationships  existing  between  operator  and  patient  should 
perhaps  be  classed  under  the  head  of  sympathy  and  an- 
tipathy. 

Closely  akin  to  the  power  of  numljers  is  that  of  words. 
Pliny  once  says  of  an  incantation  employed  to  avert  hail- 
storms that  he  would  not  dare  in  seriousness  to  insert  its 


'XXX,  12. 
'XXIV,  112. 
"VIII,  so. 
*  XXVIII,  6. 
"XXIV,  17. 


•XXX,  15. 
'  XXIX,  34. 
» XXXII,  24. 
»  XXXII,  38. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  93 

words,  although  Cato  in  his  work  on  agriculture  prescribed 
a  similar  formula  of  meaningless  words  for  the  cure  of  frac- 
tured limbs. ^  But  Pliny  does  not  object  to  the  repetition 
of  incantations  or  prayers  if  the  words  spoken  have  some 
meaning.  He  informs  us  that  ocimum  is  sown  with  curses 
and  maledictions  and  that  when  cummin  seed  is  rammed 
down  into  the  soil,  the  sowers  pray  it  not  to  come  up.^  In 
another  case  the  sower  is  to  be  naked  and  to  pray  for  him- 
self and  his  neighbors.^  In  a  third  case  in  which  a  poultice  is 
to  be  applied  to  an  inflammatory  tumor,  Pliny  says  that 
persons  of  experience  regard  it  as  very  important  that  the 
poultice  be  put  on  by  a  naked  virgin  and  that  both  she  and 
the  patient  be  fasting.  Touching  the  sufferer  with  the  back 
of  her  hand  she  is  to  say,  "Apollo  forbids  a  disease  to  in- 
crease which  a  naked  virgin  restrains."  Then,  withdraw- 
ing her  hand,  she  is  to  repeat  the  same  words  thrice  and  to 
join  with  the  patient  in  spitting  on  the  ground  each  time.* 
Indeed,  in  another  passage  Pliny  states  that  it  is  the  uni- 
versal custom  in  medicine  to  spit  three  times  with  incanta- 
tions.'^ Perhaps  the  power  of  the  words  is  thought  to  be 
increased  or  renewed  by  clearing  the  throat.  Words  were 
also  occasionally  spoken  in  plucking  herbs.  Ring-worm  or 
tetter  is  treated  by  spitting  upon  and  rubbing  together  two 
stones  covered  with  a  dry  white  moss,  and  by  repeating  a 
Greek  incantation  which  may  be  translated,  "Flee,  Cantha- 
rides,  a  wild  wolf  seeks  your  blood."  ^  Abscesses  and  in- 
flammations are  treated  with  the  herb  reseda  and  a  Latin 
translation  which  seems  irrelevant,  if  not  quite  senseless,  and 
which  may  be  translated,  "Reseda,  make  disease  recede. 
Don't  you  know,  don't  you  know  what  chick  has  dug  up  these 
roots?  May  they  have  neither  head  nor  feet."  ^  In  the  book 
following  this  passage  Pliny  raises  the  general  question  of 
the  power  of  words  to  heal  diseases.^  He  gives  many  in- 
stances of  belief  in  incantations  from  contemporary  popu- 

'XVII,  47.  ''XXVIII,  7. 

'XIX,  36.  "XXVII,    75- 

'XVIII,   35.  'XXVII,  106. 

*XXVI.  60.  •  XXVIII.  3-4. 


94 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 


CHAP. 


Attitude 
to  love- 
charms 
and  birth- 
control. 


Pliny  and 
astrology. 


lar  superstition,  from  Roman  religion,  and  from  the  annals 
of  history.  He  does  not  doubt  that  Romans  in  the  past 
have  believed  in  the  power  of  words,  and  thinks  that  if  we 
accept  set  forms  of  prayer  and  religious  formulae,  we  must 
also  admit  the  force  of  incantations.  But  he  adds  that  the 
wisest  individuals  believe  in  neither. 

Pliny's  recipes  and  operations  are  mainly  connected 
with  either  medicine  or  agriculture,  but  he  also  introduces 
as  we  have  seen  magical  procedure  employed  in  child-birth, 
safeguards  against  poisons  and  reptiles,  and  counter-charms 
against  sorcery.  He  more  than  once  avers  that  love-charms 
(amatoria)  lie  outside  his  province,^  in  one  passage  alleging 
as  a  reason  that  the  illustrious  general  Lucullus  was  killed 
by  one,"  but  he  includes  a  great  many  of  them  nevertheless.^ 
Some  herbs  are  so  employed  because  of  a  resemblance  in 
shape  to  the  sexual  organs,^  another  instance  of  association 
by  similarity.  Pliny  declared  against  abortive  drugs  as  well 
as  love-charms,^  but  cited  from  the  Commentaries  of  Caecil- 
ius  one  recipe  for  birth-control  for  the  benefit  of  over-fecund 
women,  consisting  of  a  ligature  of  two  little  worms  found 
in  the  body  of  a  certain  species  of  spider  and  bound  on  in 
deer-skin  before  sunrise.  After  a  year  the  virtue  of  this 
charm  expires.^ 

Pliny  devotes  but  a  small  fraction  of  his  work  to  the 
stars  and  heavens  as  against  terrestrial  phenomena,  and 
therefore  has  less  occasion  to  speak  of  astrology  than  of 
magic.  However,  had  he  been  a  great  believer  in  astrology 
he  doubtless  would  have  devoted  more  space  to  the  stars  and 
their  influence  on  terrestrial  phenomena.  He  recognizes  none 
the  less,  as  we  have  seen,  that  magic  and  astrology  are  in- 


*  XXVII,  35.  "Catanancen 
Thessalam  herbam  qualis  sit  de- 
scribi  a  nobis  supervacuum  est, 
cum  sit  usus  eius  ad  amatoria 
tantum."  XXVII,  99.  "Phyteuma 
quale  sit  describere  supervacuum 
habeo  cum  sit  usus  eius  tantum  ad 
amatoria." 

*XXV,  7.  "Ego  nee  abortiva 
dico     ac     ne     amatoria     quidem, 


memor  Lucullum  imperatorem 
clarissimum  amatorio  perisse  .  .  ." 

^A  iew  examples  are:  XX,  15, 
84,  92;  XXIV,  II,  42;  XXVI,  64; 
XXVII,  42,  99;  XXVIII,  77,  80; 
XXX,  49;  XXXII,  so. 

*XXII,  9. 

"XXV,  7. 

•  XXIX,  27. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  95 

timately  related  and  that  "there  is  no  one  who  is  not  eager 
to  learn  his  own  future  and  who  does  not  think  that  this  is 
shown  most  truly  by  the  heavens."^  Parenthetically  it  may 
be  remarked  that  the  general  literature  of  the  time  only  con- 
firms this  assertion  of  the  widespread  prevalence  of  astrol- 
ogy; allusions  of  poets  imply  a  technical  knowledge  of  the 
art  on  their  readers'  part;  the  very  emperors  who  occasion- 
ally banished  astrologers  from  Rome  themselves  consulted 
other  adepts.  In  another  passage  Pliny  speaks  of  men  who 
"assign  events  each  to  its  star  according  to  the  rules  of  na- 
tivities and  believe  that  God  decreed  the  future  once  for  all 
and  has  never  interfered  with  the  course  of  events  since.^ 
This  way  of  thinking  has  caught  learned  and  vulgar  alike  in 
its  current  and  has  led  to  such  further  methods  of  divina- 
tion as  those  by  lightning,  oracles,  haruspices,  and  even  such 
petty  auguries  as  from  sneezes  and  shifting  of  the  feet. 
Furthermore  in  Pliny's  list  of  men  prominent  in  the  various 
arts  and  sciences  we  find  Berosus  of  whom  a  statue  was 
erected  by  the  Athenians  in  honor  of  his  skill  in  astrological 
prognostication.'  In  another  place  where  he  speaks  for  a 
moment  of  "the  science  of  the  stars"  Pliny  disputes  the  the- 
ories of  Berosus,  Nechepso,  and  Petosiris  that  length  of 
human  life  is  ordered  by  the  stars,  and  also  makes  the  trite 
objection  to  the  doctrine  of  nativities  tliat  masters  and 
slaves,  kings  and  beggars  are  born  at  the  same  moment.*  He 
also  is  rather  inclined  to  ridicule  the  enormous  figures  of 
720,000  or  490,000  years  set  by  Epigenes  and  Berosus  and 
Critodemus  for  the  duration  of  astronomical  observations 
recorded  by  the  Babylonians.^  From  such  passages  we  get 
the  impression  that  astrology  is  widely  accepted  as  a  science 
but  that  the  art  of  nativities  at  least  is  not  regarded  by  Pliny 

^XXX,   I.    On  the  general  atti-  *  II,  5.     "Astroque  suo  eventus 

tude  to  astrology  of  the  preceding  adsignat    nascendi    legibus    semel- 

Augustan  Age   and   its    poets   see  que  in  omnes  futures  umquam  dec 

H.  W.  Garrod,  Manili  Astronomi-  decretum  in  reliquom  vero  otium 

con   Liber   II,   Oxford,    191 1,    pp.  datur." 

Ixv-lxxiii,  but  I  think  he  overesti-  ^  vil   2>7- 

mates   the  probable  effect  of  the  ^  ^' 

edict  of  16  A.D.  upon  the  poem  of  *^     '  50- 

Manilius.  ^VII,  57. 


"    96  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap.^ 

with  favor.  But  it  would  not  be  safe  to  say  that  he  denies 
the  control  of  the  stars  over  human  destiny.  Indeed,  in  one 
chapter  he  declares  that  the  astronomer  Hipparchus  can 
never  be  praised  enough  because  more  than  any  other  man 
he  proved  the  relationship  of  man  with  the  stars  and  that 
our  souls  are  part  of  the  sky.^  When  Pliny  disputes  the 
vulgar  notion  that  each  man  has  a  star  varying  in  bright- 
ness according  to  his  fortune,  rising  when  he  is  born,  and 
fading  or  falling  when  he  dies,  he  is  not  attacking  even  the 
doctrine  of  nativities;  he  is  denying  that  the  stars  are  con- 
trolled by  man's  fate  rather  than  that  man's  life  is  ordered 
by  the  stars. ^ 
Celestial  j£  pijj^y  ^hus  leaves  us  uncertain  as  to  the  relation  of 

portents.  ■' 

man  to  the  stars,  we  also  receive  conflicting  impressions 

from  his  discussion  of  various  celestial  phenomena  regarded 
as  portentous.  In  one  passage  he  speaks  of  the  debt  of 
gratitude  owed  by  mankind  to  those  great  astronomical 
geniuses  who  have  freed  men  from  their  former  supersti- 
tious fear  of  eclipses.^  But  he  explains  thunderbolts  as 
celestial  fire  vomited  forth  from  the  planet  Venus  and  "bear- 
ing omens  of  the  future."  *  He  also  gives  instances  from 
Roman  history  of  comets  which  signaled  disaster,  and  he 
expounds  the  theory  of  their  signifying  the  future.*^  What 
they  portend  may  be  determined  from  the  direction  in  which 
they  move  and  the  heavenly  body  whose  power  they  re- 
ceive, and  more  particularly  from  the  shapes  they  assume 
and  their  position  in  relation  to  the  signs  of  the  zodiac.  In- 
deed, Pliny  even  gives  examples  of  ominous  eclipses  of  the 
sun,  although  it  is  true  that  they  were  also  of  unusual 
length.^  He  also  tells  us  that  many  of  the  common  people 
still  believed  that  women  could  produce  eclipses  "by  sor- 
ceries and  herbs. '^ 

'II,  24.  "11,  9. 

MI,  6,  "Non  tanta  caelo  societas  *II,  18. 

nobiscum  est  ut  nostro  fato  mor-  '  II,  23. 

talis   sit  ibi   quoque  siderum   ful-  "II,   30. 

gor."  '  XXV,  5. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  97 

Aside  from  the  question  of  the  control  of  human  des-  The  stars 

,  .     ,      ^,.      ,  ,     ,         .        and  the 

tiny  by  the  constellations  at  birth,  Plmy  s  general  theories   world  of 

of  the  universe  and  of  the  influence  of  the  stars  upon  ter-  nature, 
restrial  nature  are  roughly  similar  to  those  of  astrology. 
For  him  the  universe  itself  is  God,  ''holy,  eternal,  vast,  all 
in  all,  nay,  in  truth  itself  all;"  ^  and  the  sun  is  the  mind 
and  soul  of  the  whole  world  and  the  chief  governor  of  na- 
ture.^ The  planets  affect  one  another.  A  cold  star  renders 
another  approaching  it  pale;  a  hot  star  causes  its  neighbor 
to  redden ;  a  windy  planet  gives  those  near  it  a  lowering  ap- 
pearance.^ At  certain  points  in  their  orbits  the  planets  are 
deflected  from  their  regular  course  by  the  rays  of  the  sun, — • 
an  unwitting  concession  to  heliocentric  theory.*  Pliny  as- 
cribes the  usual  astrological  qualities  to  the  planets.^  Saturn 
is  cold  and  rigid;  Mars,  a  flaming  fire;  Jupiter,  located  be- 
tween them,  is  temperate  and  salubrious.  Besides  their  ef- 
fects upon  one  another,  the  planets  especially  influence  the 
earth.®  Venus,  for  instance,  rules  the  process  of  genera- 
tion in  all  terrestrial  beings.'''  Following  the  Georgics  of 
Vergil  somewhat,  Pliny  asserts  that  the  stars  give  indubi- 
table signs  of  the  weather  and  expounds  the  utility  of  the 
constellations  to  farmers.^  He  tells  how  Democritus  by 
his  knowledge  of  astronomy  was  able  to  corner  the  olive 
crop  and  put  to  shame  business  men  who  had  been  decrying 
philosophy ;  ^  and  how  on  another  occasion  he  gave  his 
brother  timely  warning  of  an  impending  storm.^^  But  Pliny 
does  not  accept  all  the  theories  of  the  astrologers  as  to  con- 
trol of  the  stars  over  terrestrial  nature.  He  repeats,  but 
without  definitely  accepting  it,  the  ascription  by  the  Baby- 
lonians of  earthquakes  to  three  of  the  planets  in  particular,^^ 
and  the  notion  that  the  gem  sandastros  or  garamantica,  em- 

'II,  I.  "  XVIII,  5,  57,  69. 

MI,  4.  •XVIII,   68.     Other   authorities 

'II,  16.  tell    the     story     of     Thales;     see 

*II,   13.  Cicero,    De    divinatione,    II,    201; 

*II,  6;  and  see  II,  39.  Aristotle,  Poiit.  I,  7;  and  Dioge- 

*II,  6.    "Potentia  autem  ad  ter-       nes   Laertius. 

ram  magnopere  eorum  pertinens."  "XVIII,  78. 

Ml,  6.  "II,  81. 


98 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Astrologi- 
cal medi- 
cine. 


Conclu- 
sion : 
magic 
unity  of 
Pliny's  su-T 
perstitions. 


ployed  by  Chaldeans  in  their  ceremonies,  is  intimately  con- 
nected with  the  stars. ^  He  is  openly  incredulous  about  the 
gem  glossopetra,  shaped  like  a  human  tongue  and  supposed 
to  fall  from  the  sky  during  an  eclipse  of  the  moon  and  to 
be  invaluable  in  selenomancy.^ 

Pliny  tells  how  the  physician  Crinas  of  Marseilles  made 
a  fortune  by  regulating  diet  and  observing  hours  according 
to  the  motion  of  the  stars. ^  But  he  does  not  show  much 
faith  in  astrological  medicine  himself,  rejecting  entirely  the 
elaborate  classification  of  diseases  and  remedies  which  the 
astrologers  had  by  his  time  already  worked  out  for  the 
revolutions  of  the  sun  and  moon  in  the  twelve  signs  of  the 
zodiac*  In  his  own  recipes,  however,  astrological  consid- 
erations are  sometimes  observed,  as  we  have  already  seen, 
especially  the  rising  of  the  dog-star  and  the  phases  of  the 
moon.  Pliny,  indeed,  states  that  the  dog-star  exerts  an  ex- 
tensive influence  upon  the  earth.'^  As  for  the  moon,  the 
blood  in  the  human  body  augments  and  decreases  with  its 
waxing  and  waning  as  shell-fish  and  other  things  in  nature 
do.^  Indeed,  painstaking  men  of  research  had  discovered 
that  even  the  entrails  of  the  field-mouse  corresponded  in 
number  to  the  days  of  the  moon,  that  the  ant  stopped  work- 
ing during  the  interlunar  days,  and  that  diseases  of  the  eyes 
of  certain  beasts  of  burden  also  increased  and  decreased 
with  the  moon.'^  But  on  the  whole  Pliny's  medicine  and 
science  do  not  seem  nearly  so  immersed  in  and  saturated 
with  astrology  as  with  other  forms  of  magic.  This  gap 
was  for  the  middle  ages  amply  filled  by  the  authority 
of  Ptolemy,  of  whose  belief  in  astrology  we  shall  treat  in 
the  next  chapter. 

We  have  tried  to  analyze  the  contents  of  the  Natural 
History,  bringing  out  certain  main  divisions  and  underly- 
ing principles  of  magic  in  Pliny's  agriculture,  medicine,  and 
natural  science.    This  is,  however,  an  artificial  and  difficult 

*  XXXVII,  28.  ''II,  40. 

^ XXXVII,  59.  on  102 

"XXIX,  5.  ^^'     °  • 

*XXX,  29.  'II,  41. 


II  PLINY'S  NATURAL  HISTORY  99 

task,  since  it  is  not  easy  to  sever  materials  from  ceremonial 
or  the  virtues  of  objects  from  the  relations  of  sympathy 
or  antipathy  between  them.  Often  the  same  passage  might 
serve  to  illustrate  several  points.  Take  for  example  the 
following  sentence :  "Thrasyllus  is  authority  that  nothing 
is  so  hostile  to  serpents  as  crabs ;  swine  who  are  stung  cure 
themselves  by  this  food,  and  when  the  sun  is  in  Cancer, 
serpents  are  in  pain."  ^  Here  we  have  at  once  antipathy, 
the  remedies  used  by  animals,  the  reasoning,  characteristic 
of  magic,  from  association  and  similarity,  and  the  belief  in 
astrology.  And  this  confusion,  to  illustrate  which  a  hundred 
other  examples  might  be  collected  from  the  Natural  His- 
tory, demonstrates  how  indissolubly  interwoven  are  all  the 
varied  threads  that  we  have  been  tracing.  They  all  go 
naturally  together,  they  belong  to  the  same  long  period 
of  thought,  they  represent  the  same  stage  in  mental  develop- 
ment, they  all  are  parts  of  magic. 

^  XXXII,  19. 


CHAPTER  III 

SENECA  AND  PTOLEMY:   NATURAL  DIVINATION  AND 
ASTROLOGY 

Seneca's  Natural  Questions — Nature  study  as  an  ethical  substitute 
for  existing  religion — Limited  field  of  Seneca's  work — Marvels  accepted, 
questioned,  or  denied — Belief  in  natural  divination  and  astrology — 
Divination  from  thunder — Ptolemy — His  two  chief  works — His  mathe- 
matical method — Attitude  towards  authority  and  observation — The 
Optics — Medieval  translations  of  Almagest — Tetrabiblos  or  Quadri- 
partitum — A  genuine  reflection  of  Ptolemy's  approval  of  astrology — 
Validity  of  Astrology — Influence  of  the  stars  not  inevitable — Astrology 
as  natural  science — Properties  of  the  planets — Remaining  contents  of 
Book  One — Book  Two:  regions — Nativities — Future  influence  of  the 
Tetrabiblos. 

"When  the  stars  twinkle  through  the  loops  of  time." 

— Byron. 

Seneca's  j^  ^j^jg  chapter  we  shall  preface  the  main  theme  of  Ptolemy 
Questions,  and  his  sanction  of  astrology  by  a  consideration  of  another 
and  earlier  ancient  writer  on  natural  science  who  was 
very  favorable  to  divination  of  the  future,  namely,  the 
famous  philosopher,  statesman,  man  of  letters,  and  tutor  of 
Nero,  Lucius  Annaeus  Seneca.  In  point  of  time  his  Natural 
Questions,  or  Problems  of  Nature,  is  a  work  slightly  ante- 
dating even  the  Natural  History  of  Pliny,  but  it  is  hardly 
of  such  importance  in  the  history  of  science  as  the  more 
voluminous  works  of  the  three  great  representatives  of 
ancient  science,  Pliny,  Galen,  and  Ptolemy.  Nevertheless 
Seneca  was  well  known  and  much  cited  in  the  middle  ages 
as  an  ethical  or  moral  philosopher,  and  the  title.  Natural 
Questions,  was  to  be  employed  by  one  of  the  first  medieval 
pioneers  of  natural  science,  Adelard  of  Bath.  Seneca  in 
any  case  is  a  name  of  which  ancient  science  need  not  be 
ashamed.     He  tells  us  that  in  his  youth  he  had  already 

lOO 


CHAP.  Ill  SENECA  AND  PTOLEMY  loi 

written  a  treatise  on  earthquakes ;  ^  and  in  the  present  trea- 
tise his  aim  is  to  inquire  into  the  natural  causes  of  phenom- 
ena ;  he  wants  to  know  why  things  are  so.  He  is  aware  that 
his  own  age  has  only  entered  the  vestibule  of  the  knowledge 
of  natural  phenomena  and  forces,  that  it  has  but  just  begun 
to  know  five  of  the  many  stars,  that  "there  will  come  a  time 
when  our  descendants  will  wonder  that  we  were  ignorant  of 
matters  so  evident."  ^ 

In  one  passage  Seneca  perhaps  expresses  his  conscious-   study 

ness  of  the  very  imperfect  scientific  knowleds^e  of  his  own  °^  nature 

.  as  an  ethi- 

age  a  little  too  mystically.      'There  are  sacred  things  which   cal  substi- 

are  not  revealed  all  at  once.  Eleusis  reserves  sights  for  existing 
those  who  revisit  her.  Nature  does  not  disclose  her  mysteries  religion, 
in  a  moment.  We  think  ourselves  initiated;  we  stand  but 
at  her  portal.  Those  secrets  open  not  promiscuously  nor  to 
every  comer.  They  are  remote  of  access,  enshrined  in  the 
inner  sanctuary."  ^  Indeed,  he  shows  a  tendency  to  regard 
scientific  research  as  a  sort  of  religious  exercise  or  perhaps 
as  a  substitute  for  existing  religion  and  a  basis  for  moral 
philosophy.  He  relates  physics  to  ethics.  His  enthusiasm 
in  the  study  of  natural  forces  appears  largely  due  to  the  fact 
that  he  believes  them  to  be  of  a  sublime  and  divine  character 
and  above  the  petty  affairs  of  men.  He  also  as  constantly 
and  more  fulsomely  than  Pliny  inveighs  against  the  luxury, 
vice,  and  immorality  of  his  own  day,  and  moralizes  as  to  the 
beneficent  influence  which  natural  law  and  phenomena  should 
exert  upon  human  conduct.  It  is  interesting  to  note  that  this 
habit  of  drawing  moral  lessons  from  the  facts  of  nature 
was  not  peculiar  to  medieval  or  Christian  writers. 

With  such  subjects  as  zoology,  botany,  and  mineralogy- 
Seneca's  work  has  little  to  do;   it  does  not,  like  Pliny's 

^  L.  Anyiaei  Senecac  Naturalium  Teubner  edition,  ed.  Haase,   1881, 

Quacstionum    Libri    Scptem,    VI,  and    the     English    translation    in 

4,   "Aliquando   de  motu  terrarum  Clark  and  Geikie,  Physical  Science 

volumen  iuvenis   ediderim."     The  in    the    Time   of  Nero,    1910.     In 

edition  by  G.  D.  Koeler,  Gottingen,  Panckoucke's  Library,  vol.   147,  a 

1819,     devotes     several     hundred  French     translation     accompanies 

pages   to    a   Disquisitio    and   Ani-  the  text. 
madvcrsiones  upon  Seneca's  work.  ^VII,    25. 

I  have  also  used  the  more  recent  ^VII,  31. 


102  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 

Limited  Natural  History,  include  medicine  and  the  industrial  arts; 
Seneca's  neither  does  he,  like  Pliny,  cite  the  lore  of  the  magi.  The 
work.  phenomena  of  which  he  treats  are  mainly  meteorological 

manifestations,  such  as  winds,  rain,  hail,  snow,  comets,  rain- 
bows, and  what  he  regards  as  allied  subjects,  earthquakes, 
springs,  and  rivers.  Perhaps  he  would  not  have  regarded 
the  study  of  vegetables,  animals,  and  minerals  as  so  lofty 
and  sublime  a  pursuit.  At  any  rate,  in  consequence  of  the 
restricted  field  which  Seneca  covers  we  find  very  little  of 
the  marvelous  medicinal  and  magical  properties  of  plants, 
animals,  and  other  objects,  or  the  superstitious  procedure 
which  fill  the  pages  of  Pliny. 
Marvels  Seneca  nevertheless   has   occasion   to   repeat   some  tall 

questioned,  stories,  such  as  that  the  river  Alpheus  of  Greece  reappears 
or  denied,  as  the  Arethusa  in  Sicily  and  there  every  four  years  casts 
up  filth  from  its  depths  on  the  very  days  when  victims  are 
slaughtered  at  the  Olympic  games. ^  He  also  affirms  that 
living  beings  are  generated  in  fire;  he  believes  in  such  ef- 
fects of  lightning  as  removing  the  venom  from  snakes 
which  it  strikes;  and  he  recounts  the  old  stories  of  floating 
islands  and  of  waters  with  the  virtue  of  turning  white 
sheep  black. ^  On  the  other  hand,  he  qualifies  by  the  phrases, 
*'it  is  believed"  and  "they  say,"  the  assertions  that  certain 
waters  produce  foul  skin-diseases  and  that  dew  in  particu- 
lar, if  collected  in  any  quantity,  has  this  evil  property;  and 
he  doubts  whether  bathing  in  the  Nile  would  enable  a  woman 
to  bear  more  children.^  He  ridicules  the  custom  of  the 
city  which  had  public  watchmen  appointed  to  warn  the  in- 
habitants of  the  approach  of  hail-storms,  so  that  they  might 
avert  the  danger  by  timely  sacrifice  or  simply  by  pricking 
their  own  fingers  so  that  they  bled  a  trifle.  He  adds  that 
some  suggest  that  blood  may  possess  some  occult  property 
of  repelling  storm-clouds,  but  he  does  not  see  how  there 
can  be  such  force  in  a  drop  or  two  and  thinks  it  simpler  to 

*  III,  26.  by  lightning;  III,  passim  for  mar- 

*  V,  6,  for  animals  generated  in       velous  fountains, 
flames;   II,  31,  for  snakes  struck  *  III,  25. 


Ill  SENECA  AND  PTOLEMY  103 

regard  the  whole  thing  as  false.  In  the  same  chapter  he 
states  that  uncivilized  antiquity  used  to  believe  that  rain 
could  be  brought  on  or  driven  off  by  incantations,  but  that 
now-a-days  no  one  needs  a  philosopher  to  teach  him  that 
this  is  impossible.  ■*■ 

But  while  he  thus  rejects  incantations  and  is  practically  Belief  in 
silent  on  the  subject  of  natural  magic,  Seneca  accepts  nat-  Jjf^^'JJ'^/joj^ 
ural  divination  in  well-nigh  all  its  branches:  sacrificial,  au-  and 
gury,  astrology,  and  divination  from  thunder.  He  believes  ^^  ""^  °^' 
that  whatever  is  caused  is  a  sign  of  some  future  event. ^ 
Only  Seneca  holds  that  every  flight  of  a  bird  is  not  caused 
by  a  direct  act  of  God,  nor  the  vitals  of  the  victim  altered 
under  the  axe  by  divine  interference,  but  that  all  has  been 
prearranged  in  a  fatal  and  causal  series.^  He  believes  that 
all  unusual  celestial  phenomena  are  to  be  looked  upon  as 
prodigies  and  portents.  A  meteor  "as  big  as  the  moon  ap- 
peared when  Paulus  was  engaged  in  the  war  against  Per- 
seus" ;  similar  portents  marked  the  death  of  Augustus  and 
execution  of  Sejanus,  and  gave  warning  of  the  death  of 
Germanicus.*  But  no  less  truly  do  the  planets  in  their  un- 
varying courses  signify  the  future.  The  stars  are  of  divine 
nature,  and  we  ought  to  approach  the  discussion  of  them 
with  as  reverent  an  air  as  when  with  lowered  countenance 
we  enter  the  temples  for  worship.^  Not  only  do  the  stars 
influence  the  upper  atmosphere  as  earth's  exhalations  af- 
fect the  lower,  but  they  announce  what  is  to  occur.^  Seneca 
employs  the  statement  of  Aristotle  that  comets  signify  the 
coming  of  storms  and  winds  and  foul  weather  to  prove  that 
they  are  stars ;  and  declares  that  a  comet  is  a  portent  of  bad 
weather  during  the  ensuing  year  in  the  same  way  that  the 
Chaldeans  or  astrologers  say  that  a  man's  natal  star  deter- 
mines the  whole  course  of  his  life.''  In  fact,  Seneca's 
chief,  if  not  sole,  objection  to  the  Chaldeans  or  astrologers 
would  seem  to  be  that  in  their  predictions  they  take  only  five 


;iV,  7.  "VII,  30. 

II,     32.  6TT         ^f, 

'   II,     46.  ^^'       ^°- 

*I,  I.  'VII,  28. 


104 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Divination 

from 

thunder 


Ptolemy. 


stars  ^  into  account.  "What  ?  Think  you  so  many  thousand 
stars  shine  on  in  vain?  What  else,  indeed,  is  it  which  causes 
those  skilled  in  nativities  to  err  than  that  they  assign  us  to 
a  few  stars,  although  all  those  that  are  above  us  have  a  share 
in  the  control  of  our  fate?  Perhaps  those  which  are  nearer 
direct  their  influence  upon  us  more  closely;  perhaps  those 
of  more  rapid  motion  look  down  on  us  and  other  animals 
from  more  varied  aspects.  But  even  those  stars  that  are 
motionless,  or  because  of  their  speed  keep  equal  pace  with 
the  rest  of  the  universe  and  seem  not  to  move,  are  not  with- 
out rule  and  dominion  over  us."  -  Seneca  accepts  the  theory 
of  Berosus  that  whenever  all  the  stars  are  in  conjunction  in 
the  sign  of  Cancer  there  will  be  a  universal  conflagration, 
and  a  second  deluge  when  they  all  unite  in  Capricorn.^ 

It  is  on  thunderbolts  as  portents  of  the  future  that  Sen- 
eca dwells  longest,  however.*  "They  give,"  he  declares, 
"not  signs  of  this  or  that  event  merely,  but  often  announce 
a  whole  series  of  events  destined  to  occur,  and  that  by  mani- 
fest  decrees  and  ones  far  clearer  than  if  they  were  set  down 
in  writing."  ^  He  will  not  accept,  however,  the  theory  that 
lightning  has  such  great  power  that  its  intervention  nullifies 
any  previous  and  contradictory  portents.  He  insists  that 
divination  by  other  methods  is  of  equal  truth,  though  pos- 
sibly of  minor  importance  and  significance.  Next  he  at- 
tempts to  explain  how  the  dangers  of  which  we  are  warned 
by  divination  may  be  averted  by  prayer,  expiation,  or  sacri- 
fice, and  yet  the  chain  of  events  wrought  by  destiny  not  be 
broken.  He  maintains  that  just  as  we  employ  the  services 
of  doctors  to  preserve  our  health,  despite  any  belief  we  may 
have  in  fate,  so  it  is  useful  to  consult  a  hanispex.  Then  he 
goes  on  to  speak  of  various  classifications  of  thunderbolts 
according  to  the  nature  of  the  warnings  or  encouragements 
which  they  bring. 

We  pass  on  from  Seneca  to  a  later  and  greater  exponent 
of  natural  science  and  divination,  Ptolemy,  in  the  follow- 

^That  is  to  say,  five  in  addition  'III,  29. 

to  the  sun  and  the  moon.  *II,  31-SO. 

MI,  32.  Ml,   32. 


Ill  SENECA  AND  PTOLEMY  lOS 

ing  century.  He  was  perhaps  born  at  Ptolema'is  in  Egypt 
but  lived  at  Alexandria.  The  exact  years  of  his  birth  and 
death  are  unknown,  and  very  little  is  recorded  of  his  life  or 
personality.  The  time  when  he  flourished  is  sufficiently  in- 
dicated, however,  by  the  fact  that  his  first  recorded  astro- 
nomical observation  was  in  127  and  his  last  in  151  A.  D. 
Thus  most  of  his  work  was  probably  done  during  the  reigns 
of  Hadrian  and  Antoninus  Pius,  but  he  appears  to  have 
lived  on  into  the  reign  of  Marcus  Aurelius.  His  strictly 
scientific  style  scorns  rhetorical  devices  and  literary  felici- 
ties, and  while  it  is  clear  and  correct,  is  dry  and  imper- 
sonal.^ 

Ptolemy's  two  chief  works,  the  Geography  in  eight  His  two 
books,  and  17  nadTjixatLKri  avvra^Ls,  or  Almagest  {al-neylaTT])  ^^^^g 
as  the  Arabs  called  it,  in  thirteen  books,  have  been  so  often 
described  in  histories  of  mathematics,  astronomy,  geogra- 
phy, and  discovery  that  such  outline  of  their  contents  need 
not  be  repeated  here.  The  erroneous  Ptolemaic  theories  of 
a  geocentric  universe  and  of  an  earth's  surface  on  which  dry 
land  preponderated  are  equally  well  known.  What  is  more 
to  the  point  at  present  is  to  note  that  one  of  these  theories 
was  so  well  fitted  to  actual  scientific  observations  and  the 
other  was  thought  to  be  so  similarly  based,  that  they  stood 
the  test  of  theory,  criticism,  and  practice  for  over  a  thou- 
sand years. ^  It  should,  however,  be  said  that  the  Geography 
does  not  seem  to  have  been  translated  into  Latin  until  the 

*A    complete    edition    of    Ptol-  Geschichte  der  griechischen  Phi- 

emy's  works  has  been  in  process  losophie  und  Astrologie,   1894,  in 

of    publication    since    1898  in   the  Jahrb.    f.    Philol.    u.    Pddagogik 

Teubner  library  by  J.  L.  Heiberg  Neue    Folge,    Suppl.    Bd.    21.      A 

and    Franz    Boll.     They   are   also  recent    summary    of    investigation 

the  authors  of  the  most  important  and  bibliography  concerning  Ptol- 

recent        researches        concerning  emy  is  W.  Schmid,  Die  Nachklas- 

Ptolemy.      See    Heiberg's    discus-  sische    Periode    der    Griechischen 

sion  of  the  MSS  in  the  volumes  Litteratur,  1913,  pp.  717-24,  in  the 

of  the  above  edition  which  have  fifth  edition  of   Christ,  Gesch    d 

thus  far  appeared ;  his  articles  on  Griech.  Litt. 

the  Latin  translations  of  Ptolemy  'Some  strictures  upon   Ptolemy 

m     Hermes     XLV     (1910)     57ff,  as  a  geographer  are  made  by  Sir 

and  XLVI    (1911)    206ff;   but  es-  W.    M.    Ramsay,    The    Historical 

pecially  Boll,  ^tudien  uber  Clau-  Geography   of  Asia   Minor    1890 

dtus  Ptolcmdus.    Ein  Beitrag  zur  pp.  69-73.  '  ' 


io6 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


His 
mathe- 
matical 
method. 


opening  of  the  fifteenth  century/  when  Jacobus  Angelus 
made  a  translation  for  Pope  Alexander  V,  (1409-1410), 
which  is  extant  in  many  manuscripts  ^  as  well  as  in  print. ^ 
It  therefore  did  not  have  the  influence  and  fame  in  the 
Latin  middle  ages  that  the  Almagest  did  or  the  briefer  as- 
trological writings,  genuine  and  spurious,  current  under 
Ptolemy's  name. 

We  may  briefly  state  one  or  two  of  Ptolemy's  greatest 
contributions  to  mathematical  and  natural  science  and  his 
probable  position  in  the  history  of  experimental  method. 
Perhaps  of  greater  consequence  in  the  history  of  science 
than  any  one  specific  thing  he  did  was  his  continual  reliance 


*Schmid  would  appear  to  be 
mistaken  in  saying  that  the  Geog- 
raphy was  already  known  in  Latin 
and  Arabic  translation  in  the  time 
of  Frederick  II  (p.  718,  "Seine  in 
erster  Linie  die  Astronomic,  dann 
auch  die  Geographic  und  Har- 
monik  betreffcnden  Schriften 
haben  sich  nicht  bloss  im  Orig- 
inaltcxt  erhalten ;  sic  wurden  auch 
friihzeitig  von  den  Arabern  iibcr- 
setzt  und  sind  dann,  ahnlich  wie 
die  Werke  des  Aristoteles,  schon 
zur  Zeit  des  Kaisers  Friedrich  II, 
noch  ehe  man  sie  im  Urtext  ken- 
nen  lernte,  durch  lateinische,  nach 
dem  Arabischen  gemachte  Uber- 
setzungen  ins  Abendland  ge- 
langt"),  for  in  his  own  bibliog- 
raphy (p.  723)  we  read,  "Geog- 
raphic .  .  .  Friihste  latein.  Uber- 
setzung  des  Jacobus  Angelus 
gedruckt  Bologna,  1462."  Appar- 
ently Schmid  did  not  know  the 
date  of  Angelus'  translation. 

However,  Duhem,  III  (1915) 
417,  also  speaks  as  if  the  Geogra- 
phy were  known  in  the  thirteenth 
century:  "les  considerations  em- 
pruntees  a  la  Geographic  dc  Ptole- 
mee  fournissent  a  Robert  dc  Lin- 
coln unc  objection  contre  le  mouve- 
ment  de  precession  des  equinoxes 
tel  qu'il  est  define  dans  I'Alma- 
geste."  See  also  C.  A.  Nallino, 
Al-Huwaricmi  e  il  suo  rifacimento 
delta  geografia  di  Tolomeo,  1894, 
cited  by  Suter  (iqm)  viii-ix,  for 
a  geography  in  Arabic  preserved 
at    Strasburg    which   is   based    on 


Ptolemy's   Geography. 

"  In  this  Latin  translation  it 
is  often  entitled  Cosmographia. 
Some  MSS  are:  CLM  14583, 
15th  century,  fols.  81-215,  Cosmo- 
graphia Ptolomei  a  Jacobo  An- 
gelo  translata.  Also  BN  4801, 
4802,  4803,  4804,  4838.  Arsenal 
981,  in  an  Italian  hand,  is  pre- 
sumably incorrectly  dated  as  of 
the  14th  century. 

This  Jacobus  Angelus  was  chan- 
cellor of  the  faculty  of  Mont- 
pellier  in  1433  and  is  censured  by 
Gerson  in  a  letter  for  his  super- 
stitious observance  of  days. 

^  The  several  editions  printed 
before  1500  seem  to  have  consisted 
simply  of  this  Latin  translation, 
such  as  that  of  Bologna,  1462,  and 
Vincentiae,  1475,  and  the  Greek 
text  to  have  been  first  published 
in  1507.  Sec  Justin  Winsor,  A 
Bibliography  of  Ptolemy's  Geog- 
raphy, 1884,  in  Library  of  Har- 
vard Uitdversity,  Bibliographical 
Contributions,  No.  18: — a  bibliog- 
raphy which  deals  only  with 
printed  editions  and  not  with  the 
MSS.  According  to  Schmid,  how- 
ever, the  editio  princeps  of  the 
Greek  text  was  that  of  Basel, 
1533-  C.  Miillcr's  modern  edition 
(Didot,  1883  and  1901)  gives  an 
unsatisfactory  bare  list  of  38 
MSS.  See  also  G.  M.  Raidel, 
Commentatio  critico-literaria  de 
Claudii  Ptolemaei  Geographia 
eiusque   codicibus,   17Z7' 


Ill  SENECA  AND  PTOLEMY  107 

upon  mathematical  method  both  in  his  astronomy  and  his 
geography.  In  particular  may  be  noted  his  important  con- 
tribution to  trigonometry  in  his  table  of  chords,  which  mod- 
em scholars  have  found  correct  to  five  decimal  places,  and 
his  contribution  to  the  science  of  cartography  by  his  suc- 
cessful projection  of  spherical  surfaces  upon  flat  maps. 

Ptolemy  based  his  two  great  works  partly  upon  the  re-  Attitude 
suits  already  attained  by  earlier  scientists,  following  Hip-  authority 
parchus  especially  in  astronomy  and  Marinus  in  geography,  yofion  ^^'^' 
He  duly  acknowledged  his  debts  to  these  and  other  writers; 
praised  Hipparchus  and  recounted,  his  discoveries;  and 
where  he  corrected  Marinus,  did  so  with  reason.  But  while 
Ptolemy  used  previous  authorities,  he  was  far  from  relying 
upon  them  solely.  In  the  Geography  he  adds  a  good  deal 
concerning  the  orient  and  northern  lands  from  the  reports 
of  Roman  merchants  and  soldiers.  His  intention  was  to  re- 
peat briefly  what  the  ancients  had  already  made  clear,  and 
to  devote  his  works  chiefly  to  points  which  had  remained  ob- 
scure. His  ideal  was  to  rest  his  conclusions  upon  the  surest 
possible  observation ;  and  where  such  materials  were  meager, 
as  in  the  case  of  the  Geography,  he  says  so  at  the  start.  He 
also  recognized  that  delicate  observations  should  be  re- 
peated at  long  intervals  in  order  to  minimize  the  possibility 
of  error.  He  devised  and  described  some  scientific  instru- 
ments and  conducted  a  long  series  of  astronomical  observa- 
tions. He  anteceded  Comte  in  holding  that  one  should 
adopt  the  simplest  possible  hypothesis  consistent  with  the 
facts  to  be  explained. 

Besides  some  minor  astronomical  works  and  a  treatise  The 
on  music  which  seems  to  be  largely  a  compilation  an  im-   ^^'*"- 
portant  work  on  optics  is  ascribed  to  Ptolemy.^     It  is  the 
most  experimental  in  method  of  his  writings,  although  Alex- 
ander von  Humboldt's  characterization  of  it  as  the  only  work 
in  ancient  literature  which  reveals  an  investigator  of  nature 

_  ^L'ottica  di  Claudia  Tolomco  da  Eugenio  ammiraglio  di  Sicilia  ridotta 
in  latino,  ed.  Gilberto  Govi,  Turin,  1S85. 


io8  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

in  the  act  of  physical  experimentation^  must  be  regarded  as 
an  exaggeration  in  view  of  our  knowledge  of  the  writings 
of  other  Alexandrines  such  as  Hero  and  Ctesibius.  As  in 
the  case  of  some  of  Ptolemy's  other  minor  works,  the  Greek 
original  is  lost  and  also  the  Arabic  text  from  which  was 
presumably  made  the  medieval  Latin  version  which  alone 
has  come  down  to  us.  Yet  there  are  at  least  sixteen  manu- 
scripts of  this  Latin  version  still  in  existence.^  The  trans- 
lation was  made  in  the  twelfth  century  by  Eugene  of  Paler- 
mo, admiral  of  Sicily,  whose  name  is  attached  to  other 
translations  and  who  was  also  the  author  of  a  number  of 
Greek  poems. ^  Heller  states  that  the  Optics  was  lost  at  the 
beginning  of  the  seventeenth  century  but  that  manuscripts 
of  it  were  rediscovered  by  Laplace  and  Delambre.^  At  any 
rate  the  first  of  the  five  books  is  no  longer  extant,  although 
Bridges  thinks  that  Roger  Bacon  was  acquainted  with  it  in 
the  thirteenth  century.^  It  dealt  with  the  relations  between 
the  eye  and  light.  In  the  second  book  conditions  of  visi- 
bility are  discussed  and  the  dependence  of  the  apparent  size 
of  bodies  upon  the  angle  of  vision.  The  third  and  fourth 
books  deal  with  different  kinds  of  mirrors,  plane,  convex, 
concave,  conical,  and  pyramidical.  Most  important  of  all 
is  the  fifth  and  last  book,  in  which  dioptrics  and  refraction 
are  discussed  for  the  first  and  only  time  in  any  extant  work 
of  antiquity,^  provided  the  Optics  has  really  come  down  in 
its  present  form  from  the  time  of  Ptolemy.  His  authorship 
has  been  questioned  because  the  subject  of  refraction  is  not 
mentioned  in  the  Almagest,  although  even  astronomical 
refraction  is  discussed  in  the   Optics."^     De  Morgan  also 

*  Schmid     (1913)     still    cites    it  ^A.      Heller,      Geschichte     der 

without     qualification.     Hammer-  Physik  von  Aristoteles  bis  auf  die 

Jensen  has  an  article,  Ptolemaios  neucstc    Zcit,    2    vols.,    Stuttgart, 

und   Heron,   in    Hermes,  XLVHI  1882- 1884.     The  statement  sounds 

(1913)   224,  et  seq.  a  trifle  improbable  in  view  of  the 

'  Haskins    and    Lockwood,    The  number  of  MSS  still  in  existence. 

Sicilian       Translators       of       the  ^  Opus  Mains,  II,  7. 

Twelfth     Century,     in     Harvard  'The  Dioptra  of  Hero  is  really 

Studies     in     Classical     Philology,  geodetical. 

XXI   (1910),  89.  'Govi   (1885),  p.  151. 

^  Ibid.,  89-94. 


Ill  SENECA  AND  PTOLEMY  109 

objects  that  the  author  of  the  Optics  is  inferior  to  Ptolemy 
in  knowledge  of  geometry.^  Possibly  a  work  by  Ptolemy 
has  received  medieval  additions,  either  Arabic  or  Latin,  in 
the  version  now  extant;  maybe  the  entire  fifth  book  is  such 
a  supplement.  That  works  which  were  not  Ptolemy's  might 
be  attributed  to  him  in  the  middle  ages  is  seen  from  the  case 
of  Hero's  Catoptrica,  the  Latin  translation  of  which  from 
the  Greek  is  entitled  in  the  manuscripts  Ptolemaei  de  spec- 
ulis? 

If  there  is,  as  in  other  parallel  cases,  the  possibility  that  Medieval 
the  medieval  period  passed  off  recent  discoveries  of  its  J^^^^  ^f 
own  under  the  authoritative  name  of  Ptolemy,  there  also  Almagest. 
is  the  certainty  that  it  made  Ptolemy's  genuine  works  very 
much  its  own.  This  may  be  illustrated  by  the  case  of  the 
Almagest.  On  the  verge  of  the  medieval  period  the  work 
was  commented  upon  by  Pappus  and  Theon  at  Alexandria 
in  the  fourth,  and  by  Proclus  in  the  fifth  century.  The  Latin 
translation  by  Boethius  is  not  extant,  but  the  book  was  in 
great  repute  among  the  Arabs,  was  translated  at  Bagdad 
early  in  the  ninth  century  and  revised  later  in  the  same 
century  by  Tabit  ben  Corra.  During  the  twelfth  century 
it  was  translated  into  Latin  both  from  the  Greek  and  the 
Arabic.  The  translation  most  familiar  in  the  middle  ages 
was  that  completed  at  Toledo  in  1175  by  the  famous  trans- 
lator, Gerard  of  Cremona.  There  has  recently  been  dis- 
covered, however,  by  Professors  Haskins  and  Lockwood  ^ 
a  Sicilian  translation  made  direct  from  the  Greek  text  some 
ten  or  twelve  years  before  Gerard's  translation.     There  are 

*  Ptolemy    in    Smith's    Diction-  gest,  in  Harvard  Studies  in  Classi- 

ary   of   Greek   and  Roman   Biog-  cal    Philology,    XXI     (1910)     75- 

raphy.  102. 

^It     was     also     so     printed     in  C.    H.   Haskins,   Further  Notes 

Sphera     cum     commcntis,     1518:  on    Sicilian    Translations    of    the 

"Explicit  secundus  et  ultimus  liber  Tzvelfth    Century,    Ibid.,    XXIII, 

Ptolomei   de    Speculis.     Completa  155-66. 

fuit    eius    translatio    ultimo    De-  J.  L.  Heiberg,  Eine  mittelalter- 

cembris  anno  Christi  1269."  liche    Uebcrsetzung    der    Syntaxis 

'  C.  H.  Haskins  and  D.  P.  Lock-  des  Ptolemaios,  in  Hermes  XLV 

wood,  The  Sicilian  Translators  of  (1910)    57-66;    and   Noch    einmal 

the  Twelfth  Century  and  the  First  die     mittclaltcrliche      Ptolemaios- 

Latin  Version  of  Ptolemy's  Alma-  Uebersetznng,  Ibid.,  XLVI,  207-16. 


no 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


The  Tet- 
rabiblos  or 
Quadripar- 
titum. 


A  genuine 
reflec- 
tion of 
Ptolemy's 
approval 
of  astrol- 
ogy. 


two  manuscripts  of  this  Sicilian  translation  in  the  Vatican 
and  one  at  Florence,  showing  that  it  had  at  least  some  Ital- 
ian currency.  Gerard's  reputation  and  his  many  other 
astronomical  and  astrological  translations  probably  account 
for  the  greater  prevalence  of  his  version,  or  possibly  the 
theological  opposition  to  natural  science  of  which  the 
anonymous  Sicilian  translator  speaks  in  his  preface  had 
some  effect  in  preventing  the  spread  of  his  version. 

Of  Ptolemy's  genuine  works  the  most  germane  to  and 
significant  for  our  investigation  is  his  Tetrahihlos,  Quadri- 
partitum-j  or  four  books  on  the  control  of  human  life  by 
the  stars.  It  seems  to  have  been  translated  into  Latin  by 
Plato  of  Tivoli  in  the  first  half  of  the  twelfth  century^  be- 
fore Almagest  or  Geography  appeared  in  Latin.  In  the 
middle  of  the  thirteenth  century  Egidius  de  Tebaldis,  a 
Lombard  of  the  city  of  Parma,  further  translated  the  com- 
mentary of  Haly  Heben  Rodan  upon  the  Quadripartitum.^ 
In  the  early  Latin  editions^  the  text  is  that  of  the  medieval 
translation;  in  the  few  editions  giving  a  Greek  text  there 
is  a  different  Latin  version  translated  directly  from  this 
Greek  text.* 

In  the  Tetrahihlos  the  art  of  astrology  receives  sanction 
and  exposition  from  perhaps  the  ablest  mathematician  and 
closest  scientific  observer  of  the  day  or  at  least  from  one 
who  seemed  so  to  succeeding  generations.  Hence  from  that 
time  on  astrology  was  able  to  take  shelter  from  any  criti- 
cism under  the  aegis  of  his  authority.     Not  that  it  lacked 


*Digby  51,  13th  Century,  fols. 
79-114,  "Liber  iiii  tractatuum 
Batolomei  Alfalisobi  in  sciencia 
judiciorum  astrorum.  .  .  .  Et  per- 
fectus  est  eius  translatio  de 
Arabico  in  Latinum  a  Tiburtino 
Platone  cui  Deus  parcat  die 
Veneris  hora  tertia  XXa  die 
mensis  Octobris  anno  Domini 
MCXXVIII  {sic)  XV  die  mensis 
Saphar  anno  Arabum  DXXXIII 
{sic)  in  civitate  Barchinona. 
.  .  ."  The  date  of  translation  is 
given  as  October  2,  1138,  in  CUL 
1767,  1276  A.D.,  fols.  240-76, 
"Liber      4      Partium      Ptholomei 


Auburtino   Palatone." 

^  It  is  found  in  an  edition  printed 
at  Venice  in  1493,  "per  Bonetum 
locatellum  impensis  nobilis  viri 
Octaviani  scoti  civis  Modoetien- 
sis." 

*  In  the  British  Museum  are  edi- 
tions of  Venice,  1484,  1493,  1519; 
Paris,  1519;  Basel,  1533;  Louvain, 
1548;  it  was  also  printed  in  1551, 

1555,  1578- 

*  In  the  British  Museum  are  but 
three  editions  of  the  Greek  text, 
all  with  an  accompanying  Latin 
translation :  Niirnberg,  1535 ; 
Basel,  1553;  and  1583. 


Ill 


SENECA  AND  PTOLEMY  iii 


other  exponents  and  defenders  of  great  name  and  ability. 
Naturally  the  authenticity  of  the  Tetrabiblos  has  been  ques- 
tioned by  modern  admirers  of  Hellenic  philosophy  and  sci- 
ence who  would  keep  the  reputations  of  the  great  men  of 
the  past  free  from  all  smudge  of  superstition.  But  Franz 
Boll  has  shown  that  it  is  by  Ptolemy  by  a  close  comparison 
of  it  with  his  other  works. ^  The  astrological  Centiloquium 
or  Karpos,  and  other  treatises  on  divination  and  astrologi- 
cal images  ascribed  to  Ptolemy  in  medieval  Latin  manu- 
scripts are  probably  spurious,  but  there  is  no  doubt  of  his 
belief  in  astrology.  German  research  as  usual  regards  its 
favorite  Posidonius  as  the  ultimate  source  of  much  of  the 
Tetrabiblos,  but  this  is  not  a  matter  of  much  consequence 
for  our  present  investigation. 

In  the  Tetrabiblos  Ptolemy  first  engages  in  argument  Validity  of 
as  to  the  validity  of  the  art  of  judicial  astrology.  If  his  ^^^'■°°gy- 
remarks  in  this  connection  were  not  already  trite  conten- 
tions, they  soon  came  to  be  regarded  as  truisms.  The  laws 
of  astronomy  are  beyond  dispute,  says  Ptolemy,  but  the  art 
of  prediction  of  human  affairs  from  the  courses  of  the  stars 
may  be  assailed  with  more  show  of  reason.  Opponents  of 
astrology  object  that  the  art  is  uncertain,  and  that  it  is  use- 
less since  the  events  decreed  by  the  force  of  the  stars  are 
inevitable.  Ptolemy  opens  his  argument  in  favor  of  the  art 
by  assuming  as  evident  that  a  certain  force  is  diffused  from 
the  heavens  over  all  things  on  earth.  If  ignorant  sailors 
are  able  to  judge  the  future  weather  from  the  sky,  a  highly 
trained  astronomer  should  be  able  to  predict  concerning  its 
influence  on  man.  The  art  itself  should  not  be  rejected  be* 
cause  impostors  frequently  abuse  it,  and  Ptolemy  admits 
that  it  has  not  yet  been  brought  to  the  point  of  perfection 
and  that  even  the  skilful  investigator  often  makes  mistakes 
owing  to  the  incomplete  state  of  human  science.  For  one 
thing,  Ptolemy  regards  the  doctrine  of  the  nature  of  matter 
held  in  his  time  as  hypothetical  rather  than  certain.  An- 
other difficulty  is  that  old  configurations  of  the  stars  can- 
^  Studien  iiber  Claudius  Ptolemdus,  1894. 


112 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


Influence 
of  the 
stars  not 
inevitable. 


Astrology 
as  natural 
science. 


not  safely  be  used  as  the  basis  of  present  day  predictions. 
Indeed,  so  manifold  are  the  different  possible  positions  of 
the  stars  and  the  different  possible  arrangements  of  terres- 
trial matter  in  relation  to  the  stars  that  it  is  difficult  to  col- 
lect enough  observations  on  which  to  base  rules  of  general 
judgment.  Moreover,  such  considerations  as  diversity  of 
place,  of  custom,  and  of  education  must  be  taken  into  ac- 
count in  foretelling  the  future  of  different  persons  born 
under  the  same  stars.  But  although  for  these  reasons  pre- 
dictions frequently  fail,  yet  the  art  is  not  to  be  condemned 
any  more  than  one  rejects  the  art  of  navigation  because  of 
frequent  shipwrecks. 

Nor  it  is  true  that  the  art  is  useless  because  the  decrees 
of  the  stars  are  inevitable.  It  is  often  an  advantage  to  have 
previous  knowledge  even  of  what  cannot  be  avoided.  Even 
the  prediction  of  disaster  serves  to  break  the  news  gently. 
But  not  all  predictions  are  inevitable  and  immutable;  this 
is  true  only  of  the  motion  of  the  sky  itself  and  events  in 
which  it  is  exclusively  concerned.  "But  other  events  which 
do  not  arise  solely  from  the  sky's  motion,  are  easily  altered 
by  application  of  opposite  remedies,"  just  as  we  can  in  part 
remedy  the  hurt  of  wounds  and  diseases  or  counteract  the 
heat  of  summer  by  use  of  cooling  things.  The  Egyptians 
have  always  found  astrology  useful  in  the  practice  of  medi- 
cine. 

Ptolemy  next  proceeds  to  set  forth  the  natures  and 
powers  of  the  stars  "according  to  the  observations  of  the 
ancients  and  conformably  to  natural  science."  Later,  when 
he  comes  to  the  prediction  of  particulars,  he  still  professes 
"to  follow  everywhere  the  law  of  natural  causation,"  and 
in  a  third  passage  he  states  that  he  "will  omit  all  those 
things  which  do  not  have  a  probable  natural  cause,  which 
many  nevertheless  scrutinize  curiously  and  to  excess:  nor 
will  I  pile  up  divinations  by  lot-castings  or  from  numbers, 
which  are  unscientific,  but  I  will  treat  of  those  which  have 
an  investigated  certainty  based  on  the  positions  of  the  stars 
and  the  properties  of  places."     Connecting  the  positions  of 


in  SENECA  AND  PTOLEMY  113 

the  stars  with  earthly  regions, — it  is  an  art  that  fits  in  well 
with  Ptolemy's  other  occupations  of  astronomer  and  geogra- 
pher! The  Tetrabiblos  has  been  called  "Science's  surren- 
der," ^  but  was  it  not  more  truly  divination  purified  and 
made  scientific? 

Taking  up  first  the  properties  of  the  seven  planets,  Properties 
Ptolemy  associates  with  each  one  or  more  of  the  four  ele-  pf^^^^g 
mental  qualities,  hot,  cold,  dry,  and  moist.  Thus  the  sun 
warms  and  to  some  extent  dries,  for  the  nearer  it  comes  to 
our  pole  the  more  heat  and  drought  it  produces.  The  moon 
is  moist,  since  it  is  close  to  the  earth  and  is  affected  by  the 
vapors  from  the  latter,  while  its  influence  renders  other 
bodies  soft  and  causes  putrefaction.  But  it  also  warms  a 
little  owing  to  the  rays  it  receives  from  the  sun.  Saturn 
chills  and  to  some  extent  dries,  for  it  is  remote  from  the 
sun's  heat  and  earth's  damp  vapors.  Mars  emits  a  parching 
heat,  as  its  color  and  proximity  to  the  sun  indicate.  Jupi- 
ter, situated  between  cold  Saturn  and  burning  Mars,  is  of  a 
rather  lukewarm  nature  but  tends  more  to  warmth  and  mois- 
ture than  to  their  opposites.  So  does  Venus,  but  conversely, 
for  it  warms  less  than  Jupiter  does  but  moistens  more, 
its  large  surface  catching  many  vapors  from  the  neighbor- 
ing earth.  In  Mercury,  situated  near  sun,  moon,  and  earth 
alike,  neither  drought  nor  dampness  predominates,  but  the 
velocity  of  that  planet  makes  it  a  potent  cause  of  sudden 
changes.  In  general,  the  planets  exert  a  good  or  evil  influ- 
ence as  they  abound  in  the  two  rich  and  vivifying  qualities, 
heat  and  moisture,  or  in  the  detrimental  ones,  cold  and 
drought.  Wet  stars  like  the  moon  and  Venus,  are  femi- 
nine ;  Mercury  is  neuter ;  the  other  planets  are  masculine. 
The  sex  of  a  planet  may  also,  however,  be  reckoned  accord- 
ing to  its  position  in  relation  to  the  sun  and  the  horizon ;  and 
changes  in  the  influences  exerted  by  the  planets  are  noted  ac- 
cording to  their  position  or  relation  to  the  sun.  This  dis- 
cussion of  the  properties  of  the  planets  is  neither  convinc- 

*  "C'etait   la   capitulation   de   la   science."    Bouche-Leclerca   in   Rev, 
Hist..  LXV,  257,  note  3. 


114  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

ing  nor  scientific.  It  seems  arguing  in  a  circle  to  make  their 
effects  upon  the  earth  depend  to  such  an  extent  upon  them- 
selves being  affected  by  vapors  from  the  earth.  Indeed 
we  are  rather  surprised  that  an  astronomer  like  Ptolemy 
should  represent  vapors  from  the  earth  as  affecting  the 
planets  at  all.  But  his  discussion  is  at  least  an  effort,  albeit 
a  feeble  one,  to  express  the  potencies  of  the  planets  in 
physical  terms. 
Remaining  Ptolemy  goes  on  to  discuss  the  powers  of  the  fixed  stars 

of  Book       which  seem  to  depend  upon  their  positions  in  constellations 
O"^-  and  their  relations  to  the  planets.     Then  he  treats  of  the 

influence  of  the  four  seasons  of  the  year  and  four  cardinal 
points,  each  of  which  he  relates  to  one  of  the  four  qualities, 
hot,  cold,  dry,  and  moist.  With  a  discussion  of  the  signs 
of  the  zodiac  and  their  division  into  Houses  and  relation  in 
Trigones  or  Triplicitates  or  groups  of  three  connected  with 
the  four  qualities,  of  the  exaltation  of  the  planets  in  the 
signs  and  of  other  divisions  of  the  signs  and  relations  of 
the  planets  to  them,  the  first  book  ends. 
Book  The  second  book  begins  by  distinguishing  prediction  of 

Regions.  events  for  whole  regions  or  countries,  such  as  wars,  pesti- 
lences, famines,  earthquakes,  winds,  drought,  and  weather, 
from  the  prediction  of  events  in  the  lives  of  individuals. 
Ptolemy  holds  that  events  which  affect  large  areas  or  whole 
peoples  and  cities  are  produced  by  greater  and  more  valid 
causes  than  are  the  acts  of  individual  men,  and  also  that  in 
order  to  predict  aright  concerning  the  individual  it  is  neces- 
sary to  know  his  region  and  nationality.  He  characterizes 
the  inhabitants  of  the  three  great  climatic  zones,^  quarters 
the  inhabited  world  into  Europe,  Libya,  and  two  parts  for 
Asia  in  the  style  of  the  T  maps,  and  subdivides  these  into 
different  countries  whose  peoples  are  described,  including 
such  races  as  the  Amazons.  The  effects  of  the  stars  vary 
according  to  time  as  well  as  place,  so  that  the  period  in 
which  any   individual   lives   is  as   important  to   take  into 

^  In  the  medieval  Latin  translation  the  Slavs  replace  the  Scythians 
of  Ptolemy's  text. 


Ill  SENECA  AND  PTOLEMY  115 

account  as  his  nationality.  Ptolemy  also  discusses  how  the 
heavenly  bodies  influence  the  genus  of  events,  a  matter 
which  depends  largely  upon  the  signs  of  the  zodiac,  and 
also  how  they  determine  their  quality,  good  or  bad,  and  spe- 
cies, which  depends  on  the  dominant  stars  and  their  con- 
junctions. Consequently  he  gives  a  list  of  the  things  which 
belong  under  the  rule  of  each  planet.  The  remainder  of 
the  second  book  is  concerned  chiefly  with  prediction  of  wind 
and  weather  through  the  year  and  with  other  meteorological 
phenomena  such  as  comets. 

The  last  two  books  take  up  the  prediction  of  events  in  Nativities. 
the  lives  of  individuals  from  the  stars,  in  other  words  the 
science  of  nativities  or  genethlialogy.  The  third  book  dis- 
cusses conception  and  birth,  how  to  take  the  horoscope — 
Ptolemy  insists  that  the  astrolabe  is  the  only  reliable  instru- 
ment for  determining  the  exact  time;  sun-dials  or  water- 
clocks  will  not  do — and  how  to  predict  concerning  parents, 
brothers  and  sisters,  sex,  twins,  monstrous  births,  length 
of  life,  the  physical  constitution  of  the  child  born  and  what 
accidents  and  diseases  may  befall  it,  and  finally  concerning 
mental  traits  and  defects.  The  fourth  book  deals  less  with 
the  nature  of  the  individual  and  more  with  the  prediction  of 
external  events  which  befall  the  individual :  honors,  office, 
marriage,  offspring,  slaves,  travel,  and  the  sort  of  death  that 
he  will  die.  Ptolemy  in  opening  the  fourth  book  makes  the 
distinction  that,  while  in  the  third  book  he  treated  of  mat- 
ters antecedent  to  birth  or  immediately  related  to  birth  or 
which  concern  the  temperament  of  the  individual,  now  he 
will  deal  with  those  external  to  the  body  and  which 
happen  to  the  individual  from  without.  But  of  course  it 
is  difficult  to  maintain  such  a  distinction  with  entire  con- 
sistency. 

The  great  influence  of  the  Tetrabihlos  is  shown  not  only  Future  in- 
in  medieval  Arabic  commentaries  and  Latin  translations,   fhe""^"^!. 
but  more  immediately  in  the  astrological  writings  of  the  de-  biblos. 
dining  Roman  Empire,  when  such  astrologers  as  Hephaes- 


ii6       MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE     chap,  hi 

tion  of  Thebes/  Paul  of  Alexandria,  and  Julius  Firmicus 
Maternus  cite  it  as  a  leading  authoritative  work.  Only  the 
opponents  of  astrology  appear  to  have  remained  ignorant 
of  the  Tetrabihlos,  continuing  to  make  criticisms  of  the  art 
which  do  not  apply  to  Ptolemy's  presentation  of  it  or  which 
had  been  specifically  answered  by  him.  Thus  Sextus  Em- 
piricus,  attacking  astrology  about  200  A.  D.,  does  not  men- 
tion the  Tetrabihlos  and  some  of  the  Christian  critics  of 
astrology  apparently  had  not  read  it.  Whether  the  Neo- 
Platonists,  Porphyry  and  Proclus,  wrote  an  introduction  to 
and  commentary  upon  it  is  disputed. 

^  Indeed,  Hephaestion's  first  two  dit  Guilelmus  KroU,  Berlin,  1908. 

books    are    nothing    but    Ptolemy  See  also  CCAG  passim  concerning 

repeated.      About      contemporary  both     Hephaestion     and     Vettius 

with  Ptolemy  seems  to  have  been  Valens,  and  Engelbrecht,  Hephas- 

Vettius  Valens  whose  astrological  tion  von   Thcbcn  und  sein  astrO' 

work   is   extant :    Vettius   Valens,  logisches     Compendium,     Vienna, 

Anthologiarum  libri  primum  edi-  1887. 


CHAPTER  IV 

GALEN 

I.     The  Man  and  His  Times 

Recent  ignorance  of  Galen — His  voluminous  works — The  manuscript 
tradition  of  his  works — His  vivid  personality — Birth  and  parentage — 
Education  in  philosophy  and  medicine — First  visit  to  Rome — Relations 
with  the  emperors;  later  life — His  unfavorable  picture  of  the  learned 
world — Corruption  of  the  medical  profession — Lack  of  real  search  for 
truth — Poor  doctors  and  medical  students — Medical  discovery  in  his 
time — The  drug  trade — The  imperial  stores — Galen's  private  supply  of 
drugs — Mediterranean  commerce — Frauds  of  dealers  in  wild  beasts — 
Galen's  ideal  of  anonymity — The  ancient  book  trade — Falsification  and 
mistakes  in  manuscripts — Galen  as  a  historical  source — Ancient  slavery 
— Social  life ;  food  and  wine — Allusions  to  Judaism  and  Christianity — 
Galen's  monotheism — Christian  readers  of  Galen. 

11.     His  Medicine  and  Experimental  Science 

Four  elements  and  four  qualities — His  criticism  of  atomism — Appli- 
cation of  the  theory  of  four  qualities  in  medicine — His  therapeutics 
obsolete — Some  of  his  medical  notions — Two  of  his  cases — His  power 
of  rapid  observation  and  inference — His  happy  guesses — Tendency 
toward  scientific  measurement — Psychological  tests  with  the  pulse — 
Galen's  anatomy  and  physiology — Experiments  in  dissection — Did  he 
ever  dissect  human  bodies  ? — Dissection  of  animals — Surgical  operations 
— Galen's  argument  from  design — Queries  concerning  the  soul — No 
supernatural  force  in  medicine — Galen's  experimental  instinct — His  atti- 
tude toward  authorities — Adverse  criticism  of  past  writers — His  esti- 
mate of  Dioscorides — Galen's  dogmatism ;  logic  and  experience — His 
account  of  the  Empirics — How  the  Empirics  might  have  criticized 
Galen — Galen's  standard  of  reason  and  experience — Simples  knowable 
only  through  experience — Experience  and  food  science — Experience  and 
compounds — Suggestions  of  experimental  method — Difficulty  of  medical 
experiment — Empirical  remedies — Galen's  influence  upon  medieval  ex- 
periment— His  more  general  medieval  influence. 

III.     His  Attitude  Toward  Magic 

Accusations  of  magic  against  Galen — His  charges  of  magic  against 
others — Charms  and  wonder-workers — Animal  substances  inadmissible 

117 


Ii8  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      cha&. 

in  medicine — Nastiness  of  ancient  medicine — Parts  of  animals — Some 
scepticism — Doctrine  of  occult  virtue — Virtue  of  the  flesh  of  vipers — 
Theriac — Magical  compounds — Amulets — Incantations  and  characters — 
Belief  in  magic  dies  hard — On  Easily  Procurable  Remedies — Specimens 
of  its  superstitious  contents — External  signs  of  the  temperaments  of 
internal  organs — Marvelous  statements  repeated  by  Maimonides — 
Dreams — Absence  of  astrology  in  most  of  Galen's  medicine — The 
Prognostication  of  Disease  by  Astrology — Critical  days — On  the  His- 
tory of  Philosophy — Divination  and  demons — Celestial  bodies. 

&\\'  etris  Karayvcc nov ToSe,  duokoyco  t6  tclOos  rovudv  5 Trap'  6\ov 
knavTov  Tov  ^lov  'iiradov,  ou8evl  TnaTevcras  rdv  biriyovixkvwv  rkroiavTa, 
Trplv  Tzeipadifjvai.  Kal  avros  Siv  bwarov  tjv  els  Trelpav  tKdilv  fie. 

Kiihn,  IV,  513. 

Slo  K^-v  ix€T^  kfikris  ofxoiojs  hfjiol  <}>L\d7rov6s  re  Kal  ^rjXcoTLKds  OLkrjdeias 
yhr]TaL,  pri  TrpoTerois  tK  8volv  ^  Tpiihv  xPW^^iv  airo4>o.Lvkado3.  iroX- 
XoLKts  yap  avT(^  (i>aveiTaibia  Tri%  paxpds  irelpas  coaTrep  k<l)avr]  Kq,pol . .  . 

Kiihn,  XIII,  96-1. 

XPV  yap  t6v  pkWovra  yvuaeaOal  tl  tcov  ttoXXcov  apeivov  evdvs  ph> 
Kal  ry  ^baei.  Kal  ry  TrpcjTj]  5t5acr/caXt^  ttoKv  tcov  aWav  dieveyKtlv 
eireLdav  8k  ykvqyai,  peipaKiov  aXtjOelas  tlvos  txeiv  kporiK'^v  pavlav 
wcnrep  kv9ovaio}VTa,Kal  pr}d'  ijpkpa^  prjTevvKTos  8ia\elireLV  (TTevSovra 
re  Kal  avvTeraptvov  kKpaOelv,  ocra  toIs  kp8o^OT6.TOLS  (IprjTaL  tcov 
TraXaioiu'  kTreL8av  5*  eKpadrj,  Kpivetv  aurd  Kal  ^acravl^eiv  XP^^V 
irapir6Wcj}  Kal  crKOTeZv  iroaa  peu  6po\oyel  toIs  kpapycos  <f>aLVOpkvOis 
TTocra  5^  8ia4>kptTai  Kal  outojs  to.  fikv  atpeladai  ra  8'  aT0(TTpk4>€adat„ 

Kiihn,  II,  179. 

"But  if  anyone  charges  me  therewrith,  I  confess  my  disease 
from  which  I  have  suffered  all  my  life  long,  to  trust  none 
of  those  v^ho  make  such  statements  until  I  have  tested  them 
for  myself  in  so  far  as  it  has  been  possible  for  me  to  put  them 
to  the  test." 

"So  if  anyone  after  me  becomes  like  me  fond  of  w^ork  and 
zealous  for  truth,  let  him  not  conclude  hastily  from  tv^^o  or 
three  cases.  For  often  he  will  be  enlightened  through  long 
experience,  just  as  I  have  been."  (It  is  remarkable  that  Pto- 
lemy spoke  similarly  of  his  predecessor,  Hipparchus,  as  a  "lover 
of    toil    and    truth" — <f)LK6Trovoy  Kal  ^tXaXi70€a,    quoted    by    Orr 

(1913),  I22.> 


IV 


GALEN 


119 


"For  one  who  is  to  understand  any  matter  better  than  most 
men  do  must  straightway  differ  much  from  other  persons  in 
his  nature  and  earHest  education.  And  when  he  becomes  a 
lad  he  must  be  madly  in  love  with  the  truth  and  carried  away 
by  enthusiasm  for  it,  and  not  let  up  by  day  or  by  night  but 
press  on  and  stretch  every  nerve  to  learn  whatever  the  ancients 
of  most  repute  have  said.  But  having  learned  it,  he  must  judge 
the  same  and  put  it  to  the  test  for  a  long,  long  time  and  observe 
v/hat  agrees  with  visible  phenomena  and  what  disagrees,  and 
so  accept  the  one  and  reject  the  other." 


I.     The  Man  and  His  Times 

At  the  close  of  the  nineteenth  century  one  English  stu-  Recent 
dent  of  the  history  of  medicine  said,  "Galen  is  so  inacces-  Jf/^Qalen. 
sible  to  English  readers  that  it  is  difficult  to  learn  about 
him  at  first  hand."  ^  Another  wrote,  "There  is,  perhaps, 
no  other  instance  of  a  man  of  equal  intellectual  rank  who 
has  been  so  persistently  misunderstood  and  even  misinter- 
preted." ^  A  third  obstacle  to  the  ready  comprehension  of 
Galen  has  been  that  while  more  critical  editions  of  some 
single  works  have  been  published  by  Helmreich  and  others 
in  recent  times,^  no  complete  edition  of  his  works  has  ap- 
peared since  that  of  Kiihn  a  century  ago,^  which  is  now  re- 
garded as  very  faulty.^    A   fourth  reason   for  neglect  or 


*  James  Finlayson,  Galen:  Two 
Bibliographical  Demonstrations  in 
the  Library  of  the  Faculty  of 
Physicians  and  Surgeons  of  Glas- 
gow, 1895.  Since  then  I  believe 
that  the  only  work  of  Galen  to  be 
translated  into  English  is  On  the 
Natural  Faculties,  ed.  A.  J.  Brock, 
1916  (Loeb  Library). 

^J.  F.  Payne,  The  Relation  of 
Harvey  to  his  Predecessors  and 
especially  to  Galen:  Harveian 
Oration  of  1896,  in  The  Lancet, 
Oct.  24,  1896,  p.  113^. 

^  In  the  Teubner  texts :  Scrip- 
tora  minora,  1-3,  ed.  I.  Marquardt, 
I.  Mueller,  G.  Helmreich,  1884- 
1893 ;  De  victu,  ed.  Helmreich, 
1898;      Dc     iemperjmentis,     ed. 


Helmreich,  1904;  De  usu  partium, 
ed.  Helmreich,  1907,  1909. 

In  Corpus  Medicorum  Grae- 
corum,  V,  9,  1-2,  1914-1915,  The 
Hippocratic  Commentaries,  ed. 
Mewaldt,  Helmreich,  Westen- 
berger,  Diels,  Hieg. 

*  Carolus  Gottlob  Kiihn,  Claudii 
Galeni  Opera  Omnia,  Leipzig, 
1821-1833,  21  vols.  My  citations 
will  be  to  this  edition,  unless 
otherwise  specified.  An  older 
edition  which  is  often  cited  is  that 
of  Renatus  Charterius,  Paris, 
1679,  13  vols. 

°  The  article  on  Galen  in  PW 
regards  some  of  the  treatises  as 
printed  in  Kiihn  as  almost  un- 
readable. 


120  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

misunderstanding  of  Galen  is  probably  that  there  is  so  much 
by  him  to  be  read. 
His  volu-  Athenaeus  stated  that  Galen  wrote  more  treatises  than 

works.^  any  other  Greek,  and  although  many  are  now  lost,  more 
particularly  of  his  logical  and  philosophical  writings,  his 
collected  extant  works  in  Greek  text  and  Latin  translation 
fill  some  twenty  volumes  averaging  a  thousand  pages  each. 
When  we  add  that  often  there  are  no  chapter  headings  or 
other  brief  clues  to  the  contents,^  which  must  be  ploughed 
through  slowly  and  thoroughly,  since  some  of  the  most 
valuable  bits  of  information  come  in  quite  incidentally  or 
by  way  of  unlooked-for  digression;  that  errors  in  the  printed 
text,  and  the  technical  vocabulary  with  numerous  words 
not  found  in  most  classical  dictionaries  increase  the  reader's 
difficulties;  ^  and  that  little  if  any  of  the  text  possesses  any 
present  medical  value,  while  much  of  it  is  dreary  enough 
reading  even  for  one  animated  by  historical  interest,  espe- 
cially if  one  has  no  technical  knowledge  of  medicine  and 
surgery : — when  we  consider  all  these  deterrents,  we  are  not 
surprised  that  Galen  is  little  known.  "Few  physicians  or 
even  scholars  in  the  present  day,"  continues  the  English 
historian  of  medicine  quoted  above,  "can  claim  to  have 
read  through  this  vast  collection ;  I  certainly  least  of  all.  I 
can  only  pretend  to  have  touched  the  fringe,  especially  of 
the  anatomical  and  physiological  works."  ^ 

*  Although  Kiihn's  Index  fills  a  amined     long     stretches     of     text 

volume,  it  is  far  from  dependable.  from   which   I   have  got  nothing. 

^Liddell  and  Scott  often  fail  to  For   the   most  part,   I   thought   it 

allude    to    germane    passages    in  better  not  to  take  time  to  read  the 

Galen's    works,    even    when    they  Hippocratic      commentaries.       At 

include,    with     citation    of     some  first    I    was    inclined    to    depend 

other  author,  the  word  he  uses.  upon  others   for  Galen's  treatises 

^  Perhaps  at  this  point  a  simi-  on  anatomy  and  physiology,  but 
larly  candid  confession  by  the  finally  I  read  most  of  them  in 
present  writer  is  in  order.  I  have  order  to  learn  at  first  hand  of  his 
tried  to  do  a  little  more  than  Dr.  argument  from  design  and  his 
Payne  in  his  modesty  seems  ready  attitude  towards  dissection.  Fur- 
to  admit  of  himself,  and  to  look  ther  than  this  the  reader  can  prob- 
over  carefully  enough  not  to  miss  ably  judge  for  himself  from  my 
anything  of  importance  those  citations  as  to  the  extent  and 
works  which  seemed  at  all  likely  depth  of  my  reading.  My  first 
to  bear  upon  my  particular  inter-  draft  was  completed  before  I  dis- 
est,  the  history  of  science  and  covered  that  Puschmann  had  made 
magic.    In  consequence  I  have  ex-  considerable    use    of     Galen    for 


IV 


GALEN 


121 


works. 


Although  the  works  of  Galen  are  so  voluminous,  they  The 
have  reached  us  for  the  most  part  in  comparatively  late  ^adition^^ 
manuscripts/  and  to  some  extent  perhaps  only  in  their  me-  of  Galen's 
dieval  form.  The  extant  manuscripts  of  the  Greek  text 
are  mostly  of  the  fifteenth  century  and  represent  the  en- 
thusiasm of  humanists  who  hoped  by  reviving  the  study 
of  Galen  in  the  original  to  get  something  new  and  better 
out  of  him  than  the  schoolmen  had.  In  this  expectation  they 
seem  to  have  been  for  the  most  part  disappointed ;  the  mid- 
dle ages  had  already  absorbed  Galen  too  thoroughly.  If  it 
be  true,  as  Dr.  Payne  contends,^  that  the  chief  original  con- 
tributions to  medical  science  of  the  Renaissance  period  were 
the  work  of  men  trained  in  Greek  scholarship,  this  was  be- 
cause, when  they  failed  to  get  any  new  ideas  from  the  Greek 
texts,  they  turned  to  the  more  promising  path  of  experimen- 
tal research  which  both  Galen  and  the  middle  ages  had  al- 
ready advocated.  The  bulky  medieval  Latin  translations  ^  of 
Galen  are  older  than  most  of  the  extant  Greek  texts ;  there 
are  also  versions  in  Arabic  and  Syriac*  For  the  last  five 
books  of  the  Anatomical  Exercises  the  only  extant  text  is 
an  Arabic  manuscript  not  yet  published.^ 


medical  conditions  in  the  Roman 
Empire  in  his  History  of  Medi- 
cal Education,  English  transla- 
tion, London,  1891,  pp.  93-ii3- 
For  the  sake  of  a  complete 
and  well-rounded  survey  I  have 
thought  it  best  to  retain  those  pas- 
sages where  I  cover  about  the 
same  ground.  I  have  been  unable 
to  procure  T.  Meyer-Steineg,  Ein 
Tag  ini  Leben  des  Galen,  Jena, 
1913,  63  pp. 

^  For  an  account  of  the  MSS 
see  H.  Diels,  Berl.  Akad.  Abh. 
(1905),  SSff.  Some  fragments  of 
Galen's  work  on  medicinal  simples 
exist  in  a  fifth  century  MS  of 
Dioscorides  at  Constantinople  and 
have  been  reproduced  by  M.  Well- 
mann  in  Hermes,  XXXVIII 
(1903),  292fif.  The  first  two  books 
of  his  Trepi  TUiv  iv  ralj  Tpo4>als  Svva- 
fieuv  were  discovered  in  a  Wolf- 
enbiittel  palimpsest  of  the  fifth 
or    sixth    century    by    K.    Koch; 


see  Berl.  Akad.  Sitzb.  (1907), 
I03ff. 
'Lancet  (1896),  p.  II3S- 
^  For  these  see  V.  Rose,  Ana- 
lecta  Graeca  et  Latina,  Berlin, 
1864.  As  a  specimen  of  these 
medieval  Latin  translations  may 
be  mentioned  a  collection  of  some 
twenty-six  treatises  in  one  huge 
volume  which  I  have  seen  in  the 
library  of  Balliol  College,  Oxford: 
Balliol  231,  a  large  folio,  early 
14th  century  (a  note  of  owner- 
ship was  added  in  1334  at  Canter- 
bury) fols.  437,  double  columned 
pages.  For  the  titles  and  incipits 
of  the  individual  treatises  see 
Coxe  (1852). 

*A.  Merx,  "Proben  der  syri- 
schen  Uebersetzung  von  Galenus' 
Schrift  iiber  die  einfachen  Heil- 
mittel,"  Zeitsch.  d.  Deutsch.  Mor^ 
gendl.     Gcsell.     XXXIX     (1885). 

237-305. 
*  Payne,  Lancet   (1896),  p.  1130. 


122 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


Galen's 
vivid  per- 
sonality. 


Birth  and 
parentage. 


If  SO  comparatively  little  is  generally  known  about  Galen, 
it  is  not  because  he  had  an  unattractive  personality.  Nor 
is  it  difficult  to  make  out  the  main  events  of  his  hfe.  His 
works  supply  an  unusual  amount  of  personal  information, 
and  throughout  his  writings,  unless  he  is  merely  transcrib- 
ing past  prescriptions,  he  talks  like  a  living  man,  detailing 
incidents  of  daily  life  and  making  upon  the  reader  a  vivid 
and  unaffected  impression  of  reality.  Daremberg  asserts  ^ 
that  the  exuberance  of  his  imagination  and  his  vanity  fre- 
quently make  us  smile.  It  is  true  that  his  pharmacology  and 
therapeutics  often  strike  us  as  ridiculous,  but  he  did  not 
imagine  them,  they  were  the  medicine  of  his  age.  It  is  true 
that  he  mentions  cases  which  he  has  cured  and  those  in  which 
other  physicians  have  been  at  fault,  but  official  war  des- 
patches do  the  same  with  their  own  victories  and  the  enemy's 
defeats.  Vae  victis!  In  Galen's  case,  at  least,  posterity 
long  confirmed  his  own  verdict.  And  dull  or  obsolete  as  his 
medicine  now  is,  his  scholarly  and  intellectual  ideals  and 
love  of  hard  work  at  his  art  are  still  a  living  force,  while 
the  reader  of  his  pages  often  feels  himself  carried  back  to 
the  Roman  world  of  the  second  century.  Thus  "the  magic 
of  literature,"  to  quote  a  fine  sentence  by  Payne,  "brings 
together  thinkers  widely  separated  in  space  and  time."  ^ 

Galen — he  does  not  seem  to  have  been  called  Claudius 
until  the  time  of  the  Renaissance — was  born  about  129  A.D.* 
at  Pergamum  in  Asia  Minor.  His  father,  Nikon,  was  an 
architect  and  mathematician,  trained  in  arithmetic,  geome- 
try, and  astronomy.  Much  of  this  education  he  transmitted 
to  his  son,  but  even  more  valuable,  in  Galen's  opinion,  were 
his  precepts  to  follow  no  one  sect  or  party  but  to  hear  and 
judge  them  all,  to  despise  honor  and  glory,  and  to  magnify 
truth  alone.  To  this  teaching  Galen  attributes  his  own 
peaceful  and  painless  passage  through  life.     He  has  never 


*  Ch.  V.  Daremberg,  Exposition 
des  connaissances  de  Galien  sur 
I'anatomie,  la  physiologie,  et  la 
pathologic  du  systcme  nerveux, 
Paris,  1841. 


^Lancet  (1896),  p.  1140. 

*  Brock  (1916),  p.  xvi,  says  in 
131  A.D.  Clinton,  Fasti  Romani, 
placed  it  in  130. 


IV  GALEN  122, 

grieved  over  losses  of  property  but  managed  to  get  along 
somehow.  He  has  not  minded  much  when  some  have  vitu- 
perated him,  thinking  instead  of  those  who  praise  him.  In 
later  life  Galen  looked  back  with  great  affection  upon  his 
father  and  spoke  of  his  own  great  good  fortune  in  having 
as  a  parent  that  gentlest,  justest,  most  honest  and  humane 
of  men.  On  the  other  hand,  the  chief  thing  that  he  learned 
from  his  mother  was  to  avoid  her  failings  of  a  sharp  tem- 
per and  tongue,  with  which  she  made  life  miserable  for  their 
household  slaves  and  scolded  his  father  worse  than  Xan- 
thippe ever  did  Socrates.^ 

In  one  of  his  works  Galen  speaks  of  the  passionate  love  Education 
and  enthusiasm  for  truth  which  has  possessed  him  since  boy-  o"h'^*'and 
hood,  so  that  he  has  not  stopped  either  by  day  or  by  night  medicine, 
from  quest  of  it.^  He  realized  that  to  become  a  true  scholar 
required  both  high  natural  qualifications  and  a  superior  type 
of  education  from  the  start.  After  his  fourteenth  year  he 
heard  the  lectures  of  various  philosophers,  Platonist  and 
Peripatetic,  Stoic  and  Epicurean ;  but  when  about  seventeen, 
warned  by  a  dream  of  his  father,^  he  turned  to  the  study 
of  medicine.  This  incident  of  the  dream  shows  that 
neither  Galen  nor  his  father,  despite  their  education  and  in- 
tellectual standards,  were  free  from  the  current  belief  in 
occult  influences,  of  which  we  shall  find  many  more  instances 
in  Galen's  works.  Galen  first  studied  medicine  for  four 
years  under  Satyrus  in  his  native  city  of  Pergamum,  then 
under  Pelops  at  Smyrna,  later  under  Numisianus  at  Corinth 
and  Alexandria.^  This  was  about  the  time  that  the  great 
mathematician  and  astronomer,  Ptolemy,  was  completing 
his  observations  ^  in  the  neighborhood  of  Alexandria,  but 
Galen  does  not  mention  him,  despite  his  own  belief  that  a 
first-rate    physician    should    also    know    such    subjects    as 

^  These  details  are  from  the  De  XIX,  59. 

cognoscendis     curandisque     animi  *  De    anatom.    administ.,    Kiihn, 

morbis,  cap.  8,  Kiihn,  V,  40-44-  II,  217,  224-25,  660.     See  also  XV, 

^De     naturalihus     facultatibus,  136;  XIX,  57. 

^^'  ^9'  Kiihn,  II,  179.  =  His  recorded  astronomical  ob- 

'  Kiihn,    X,    609    (De    methodo  servations  extend  from  127  to  151 

medendi);    also    XVI,    223;    and  A.D. 


124 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


First  visit 
to  Rome. 


Relations 
with  the 
emperors : 
later  life. 


geometry  and  astronomy,  music  and  rhetoric.^  Galen's  in- 
terest in  philosophy  continued,  however,  and  he  wrote  many 
logical  and  philosophical  treatises,  most  of  which  are  lost.^ 
His  father  died  when  he  was  twenty,  and  it  was  after  this 
that  he  went  to  other  cities  to  study. 

Galen  returned  to  Pergamum  to  practice  and  was,  when 
but  twenty-nine,  made  the  doctor  for  the  gladiators  by  five 
successive  pontiffs.^  During  his  thirties  came  his  first  resi- 
dence at  Rome.*  The  article  on  Galen  in  Pauly-Wissowa 
states  that  he  was  driven  away  from  Rome  by  the  plague, 
and  in  De  libris  pi'opriis  he  does  say  that,  "when  the  great 
plague  broke  out  there,  I  hurriedly  departed  from  the  city 
for  my  native  land."  ^  But  in  De  prognosticatione  ad  Epi- 
genem  his  explanation  is  that  he  became  disgusted  with  the 
malice  of  the  envious  physicians  of  the  capital,  and  deter- 
mined to  return  home  as  soon  as  the  sedition  there  was  over.^ 
Meanwhile  he  stayed  on  and  gained  great  fame  by  his  cures 
but  their  jealousy  and  opposition  multiplied,  so  that  pres- 
ently, when  he  learned  that  the  sedition  was  over,  he  went 
back  to  Pergamum. 

His  fame,  however,  had  come  to  the  imperial  ears  and 
he  was  soon  summoned  to  Aquileia  to  meet  the  emperors  on 
their  way  north  against  the  invading  Germans.  An  out- 
break of  the  plague  there  prevented  their  proceeding  with 
the  campaign  immediately,"^  and  Galen  states  that  the  em- 
perors fled  for  Rome  with  a  few  troops,  leaving  the  rest  to 
suffer  from  the  plague  and  cold  winter.  On  the  way  Lucius 
Verus  died,  and  when  Marcus  Aurelius  finally  returned  to 
the  front,  he  allowed  Galen  to  go  back  to  Rome  as  court 


^Kiihn,  X,  i6. 

^Fragments  du  commcntaire  de 
G  alien  siir  le  Timce  de  Plat  on, 
were  published  for  the  first  time, 
both  in  Greek  and  a  French  trans- 
lation, together  with  an  Essai  sur 
Galien  considcrc  comme  philo- 
sophe,  by  Ch.  Daremberg,  Paris, 
1848. 

"  Kiihn,  XIII,  599-6oo. 

*  Clinton,   Fasti   Romani,   I,   151 


and  155,  speaks  of  a  first  visit  of 
Galen  to  Rome  in  162  and  a  second 
in  164,  but  he  has  misinterpreted 
Galen's  statements.  When  Galen 
speaks  of  his  second  visit  to 
Rome,  he  means  his  return  after 
the  plague. 

°  Kiihn,  XIX,  IS. 

"Kiihn,  XIV,  622,  625,  648;  sec 
also  I,  54-57,  and  XII,  263. 

'  Kiihn,  XIV,  649-50. 


IV  GALEN  125 

physician  to  Commodus.^  The  prevalence  of  the  plague  at 
this  time  is  illustrated  by  a  third  encounter  which  Galen  had 
with  it  in  Asia,  when  he  claims  to  have  saved  himself  and 
others  by  thorough  venesection.^  The  war  lasted  much 
longer  than  had  been  anticipated  and  meanwhile  Galen  was 
occupied  chiefly  in  literary  labors,  completing  a  number  of 
works.  In  192  some  of  his  writings  and  other  treasures 
were  lost  in  a  fire  which  destroyed  the  Temple  of  Peace  on 
the  Sacred  Way.  Of  some  of  the  works  which  thus  per- 
ished he  had  no  other  copy  himself.  In  one  of  his  works 
on  compound  medicines  he  explains  that  some  persons  may 
possess  the  first  two  books  which  had  already  been  pub- 
lished, but  that  these  had  perished  with  others  in  a  shop  on 
the  Sacra  Via  when  the  whole  shrine  of  peace  and  the  great 
libraries  on  the  Palatine  hill  were  consumed,  and  that  his 
friends,  none  of  whom  possessed  copies,  had  besought  him 
to  begin  the  work  all  over  again. ^  Galen  was  still  alive  and 
writing  during  the  early  years  of  the  dynasty  of  the  Severi, 
and  probably  died  about  200. 

Although  the  envy  of  other  physicians  at  Rome  and   His  unfa- 

their  accusing  him  of  resort  to  magic  arts  and  divination  vorable 
,  .  ?  .       .  picture  of 

m  his  marvelous  prognostications  and  cures  were  perhaps  the  learned 
neither  the  sole  nor  the  true  reason  for  Galen's  temporary  ^°^ 
withdrawal  from  the  capital,  there  probably  is  a  great  deal 
of  truth  in  the  picture  he  paints  of  the  medical  profession 
and  learned  world  of  his  day.  There  are  too  many  other 
ancient  witnesses,  from  the  encyclopedist  Pliny  and  the 
satirist  Juvenal  to  the  fourth  century  lawyer  and  astrologer, 
Firmicus,  who  substantiate  his  charges  to  permit  us  to  ex- 
plain them  away  as  the  product  of  personal  bitterness  or 

*  R.  M.  Briau,  L'Archiafrie  Ro-  Merton    219,    early    14th    century, 

maine,  Paris,  1877,  however,  held  fol.     2^ — "Incipit     liber     Galieni 

that  Galen  never  received  the  offi-  archistratos     medicorum     de    ma- 

cial  title,  archiater;  see  p.  24,  "il  est  litia   complexionis   diversae." 

difficile    de    comprendre    pourquoi  ^  De  venae  sectione,  Kiihn,  XIX, 

le  medecin   de   Pergame   qui  don-  524. 

nait  des  soins  a  I'empereur  Marc  ^  Kiihn,    XIII,    2^2-62, ;    for    an- 

Aurele,  ne   fut  jamais  honore  de  other  allusion  to  this  fire  see  XIV, 

ce  titre."    But  he  is  given  the  title  66.    Also  II,  216;  XIX,  19  and  41. 
in    at    least    one    medieval    MS — 


126 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


Corrup- 
tion of  the 
medical 
profession. 


pessimism.  We  feel  that  these  men  lived  in  an  intellectual 
society  where  faction  and  villainy,  superstition  and  petty- 
mindedness  and  personal  enmity,  were  more  manifest  than 
in  the  quieter  and,  let  us  hope,  more  tolerant  learned  world 
of  our  time.  Selfishness  and  pretense,  personal  likes  and 
dislikes,  undoubtedly  still  play  their  part,  but  there  is  not 
passionate  animosity  and  open  war  to  the  knife  on  every 
hand.  The  stattis  belli  may  still  be  characteristic  of  politics 
and  the  business  world,  but  scholars  seem  able  to  live  in 
substantial  peace.  Perhaps  it  is  because  there  is  less  prospect 
of  worldly  gain  for  members  of  the  learned  professions 
than  in  Galen's  day.  Perhaps  it  is  due  to  the  growth  of  the 
impartial  scientific  spirit,  of  unwritten  codes  of  courtesy  and 
ethics  within  the  leading  learned  professions,  and  of  state 
laws  concerning  such  matters  as  patents,  copyright,  profes- 
sional degrees,  pure  food,  and  pure  drugs.  Perhaps,  in  the 
unsatisfactory  relations  between  those  who  should  have  been 
the  best  educated  and  most  enlightened  men  of  that  time 
we  may  see  an  important  symptom  of  the  intellectual  and 
ethical  decline  of  the  ancient  world. 

Galen  states  that  many  tire  of  the  long  struggle  with 
crafty  and  wicked  men  which  they  have  tried  to  carry  on, 
relying  upon  their  erudition  and  honest  toil  alone,  and 
withdraw  disgusted  from  the  madding  crowd  to  save  them- 
selves in  dignified  retirement.  He  especially  marvels  at 
the  evil-mindedness  of  physicians  of  reputation  at  Rome. 
Though  they  live  in  the  city,  they  are  a  band  of  robbers  as 
truly  as  the  brigands  of  the  mountains.  He  is  inclined  to 
account  for  the  roguery  of  Roman  physicians  compared  to 
those  of  a  smaller  city  by  the  facts  that  elsewhere  men  are 
not  so  tempted  by  the  magnitude  of  possible  gain  and  that 
in  a  smaller  town  everyone  is  known  by  everyone  else  and 
questionable  practices  cannot  escape  general  notice.  The 
rich  men  of  Rome  fall  easy  prey  to  these  unscrupulous  prac- 
titioners who  are  ready  to  flatter  them  and  play  up  to  their 
weaknesses.  These  rich  men  can  see  the  use  of  arithmetic 
and   geometry,    which   enable   them    to   keep   their   books 


tv  GALEN  127 

straight  and  to  build  houses  for  their  domestic  comfort, 
and  of  divination  and  astrology,  from  which  they  seek 
to  learn  whose  heirs  they  will  be,  but  they  have  no 
appreciation  of  pure  philosophy  apart  from  rhetorical 
sophistry.-^ 

Galen  more  than  once  complains  that  there  are  no  real  Lack  of 
seekers  after  truth  in  his  time,  but  that  all  are  intent  upon  for  truth, 
money,  political  power,  or  pleasure.  You  know  very  well, 
he  says  to  one  of  his  friends  in  the  De  methodo  medendi, 
that  not  five  men  of  all  those  whom  we  have  met  prefer  to 
be  rather  than  to  seem  wise.^  Many  make  a  great  outward 
display  and  pretense  in  medicine  and  other  arts  who  have 
no  real  knowledge.^  Galen  several  times  expresses  his 
scorn  for  those  who  spend  their  mornings  in  going  about 
saluting  their  friends,  and  their  evenings  in  drinking  bouts 
or  in  dining  with  the  rich  and  powerful.  Yet  even  his 
friends  have  reproached  him  for  studying  too  much  and  not 
going  out  more.  But  while  they  have  wasted  their  hours 
thus,  he  has  spent  his,  first  in  learning  all  that  the  ancients 
have  discovered  that  is  of  value,  then  in  testing  and  prac- 
ticing the  same.*  Moreover,  now-a-days  many  are  trying 
to  teach  others  what  they  have  never  accomplished  them- 
selves.' Thessalus  not  only  toadied  to  the  rich  but  secured 
many  pupils  by  offering  to  teach  them  medicine  in  six 
months.^  Hence  it  is  that  tailors  and  dyers  and  smiths 
are  abandoning  their  arts  to  become  physicians.  Thessalus 
himself,  Galen  ungenerously  taunts,  was  educated  by  a 
father  who  plucked  wool  badly  in  the  women's  apartments.''^ 
Indeed,  Galen  himself,  by  the  violence  of  his  invective  and 
the  occasional  passionateness  of  his  animosity  in  his  con- 
troversies with  other  individuals  or  schools  of  medicine, 
illustrates  that  state  of  war  in  the  intellectual  world  of  his 
age  to  which  we  have  adverted. 

^■For    the    statements     of     this  *Kuhn,  X,    i,  y6. 

paragraph  see  Kiihn,  XIV,  603-5,  •  Kiihn  X    600 
620-23.                                                                        '      '       ^' 

" Kiihn,   X,    114.  'Kiihn,  X,  4-5. 

•Kiihn,  XIV,  599-600.  'Kiihn,  X,   10. 


128 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


Poor  doc- 
tors and 
medical 
students. 


Medical 
discovery 
in  Galen's 
time. 


The  drug 
trade. 


We  suggested  the  possibility  that  learning  compared  to 
other  occupations  was  more  remunerative  in  Galen's  day 
than  in  our  own,  but  there  were  poor  physicians  and  medi- 
cal students  then,  as  well  as  those  greedy  for  gain  or  who 
associated  with  the  rich.  Many  doctors  could  not  afford  to 
use  the  rarer  or  stronger  simples  and  limited  themselves  to 
easily  procured,  inexpensive,  and  homely  medicaments.^ 
Many  of  his  fellow-students  regarded  as  a  counsel  of  per- 
fection unattainable  by  them  Galen's  plan  of  hearing  all  the 
different  medical  sects  and  comparing  their  merits  and  test- 
ing their  validity.^  They  said  tearfully  that  this  course  was 
all  very  well  for  him  with  his  acute  genius  and  his  wealthy 
father  behind  him,  but  that  they  lacked  the  money  to  pursue 
an  advanced  education,  perhaps  had  already  lost  valuable 
time  under  unsatisfactory  teachers,  or  felt  that  they  did  not 
possess  the  discrimination  to  select  for  themselves  what  was 
profitable   from  several  conflicting  schools. 

Galen  was,  it  has  already  been  made  apparent,  an  intel- 
lectual aristocrat,  and  possessed  little  patience  with  those 
stupid  men  who  never  learn  anything  for  themselves,  though 
they  see  a  myriad  cures  worked  before  their  eyes.  But  that, 
apart  from  his  own  work,  the  medical  profession  was  not 
entirely  stagnant  in  his  time,  he  admits  when  he  asserts  that 
many  things  are  known  to-day  which  had  not  been  discov- 
ered before,  and  when  he  mentions  some  curative  methods 
recently  invented  at  Rome.^ 

Galen  supplies  considerable  information  concerning  the 
drug  trade  in  Rome  itself  and  throughout  the  empire.  He 
often  complains  of  adulteration  and  fraud.  The  physician 
must  know  the  medicinal  simples  and  their  properties  him- 
self and  be  able  to  detect  adulterated  medicines,  or  the  mer- 
chants, perfumers,  and  herbarii  will  deceive  him.*  Galen 
refuses  to  reveal  the  methods  employed  in  adulterating 
opobalsam,  which  he  had  investigated  personally,  lest  the 


*  Kiihn,  XII,  909,  916,  and  in  vol. 
XIV  the  entire  treatise  De  reme- 
diis  parabilibus. 


*  Kiihn,  X,  560. 
"Kiihn,  X,  loio-ii. 

*  Kiihn,  XIII,  571-72. 


IV  GALEN  129 

evil  practice  spread  further.^  At  Rome  at  least  there  were 
dealers  in  unguents  who  corresponded  roughly  to  our  drug- 
gists. Galen  says  there  is  not  an  unguent-dealer  in  Rome 
who  is  unacquainted  with  herbs  from  Crete,  but  he  asserts 
that  there  are  equally  good  medicinal  plants  growing  in  the 
very  suburbs  of  Rome  of  which  they  are  totally  ignorant, 
and  he  taxes  even  those  who  prepare  drugs  for  the  em- 
perors with  the  same  oversight.  He  tells  how  the  herbs 
from  Crete  come  wrapped  in  cartons  with  the  name  of  the 
herb  written  on  the  outside  and  sometimes  the  further  state- 
ment that  it  is  canipestris.^  These  Roman  drug  stores  seem 
not  to  have  kept  open  at  night,  for  Galen  in  describing  a 
case  speaks  of  the  impossibility  of  procuring  the  medicines 
needed  at  once  because  "the  lamps  were  already  lighted."  ^ 

The  emperors  kept  a  special  store  of  drugs  of  their  own  The 
and  had  botanists  in  Sicily,  Crete,  and  Africa  who  supplied  stcu-es!^ 
not  only  them  with  medicinal  herbs,  but  also  the  city  of 
Rome  as  well,  Galen  says.  However,  the  emperors  appear 
to  have  reserved  a  large  supply  of  the  finest  and  rarest  sim- 
ples for  their  own  use.  Galen  mentions  a  large  amount  of 
Hymettus  honey  in  the  imperial  stores — kv  rals  avroKparo- 
pLKals  airodrjKaLs,^  whence  our  word  "apothecary."  ^  He  proves 
that  cinnamon  ^  loses  its  potency  with  time  by  his  own  ex- 

*  Kijhn,  XIV,  62,  and  see  Pusch-  dicitur  is  qui  species  aromaticas 
mann,  History  of  Medical  Educa-  et  res  quacunque  arti  medicine  et 
tion  (1891),  p.  108.  cirurgie    necessarias    habet    penes 

^  Kiilin,  XIV,  10,  30,  79;  and  see  se    et    venales    exponit,"     fol.    3. 

Puschmann   (1891),  109-11,  where  "According      to       Hugutius       an 

there  is  bibliography  of  the  sub-  apothecary    is    one    who    collects 

ject.  samples  of  various  commodities  in 

^  Kiihn,  X,  792.  his  stores.   An  apothecary  is  called 

*  Kiihn,  XIV,  26.  one  who  has  at  hand  and  exposes 
"  The     meaning     of     the     word  for  sale  aromatic  species  and  all 

"apothecary"  is  explained  as  fol-  sorts  of  things  needful  in  medi- 
lows  in  a  fourteenth  century  cine  and  surgery." 
manuscript  at  Chartres  which  is  "The  nest  of  the  fabled  cinna- 
a  miscellany  of  religious  treatises  mon  bird  was  supposed  to  contain 
with  a  bestiary  and  lapidary  and  supplies  of  the  spice,  which  He- 
bears  the  title,  "Apothecarius  rodotus  (III,  iii)  tells  us  the 
moralis  monasterii  S.  Petri  Car-  Arabian  merchants  procured  by 
notensis."  leaving  heavy  pieces  of  flesh  for 
"Apothecarius  est,  secundum  the  birds  to  carry  to  their  nests, 
Hugucium,  qui  nonnullas  diver-  which  then  broke  down  under  the 
sarum  rerum  species  in  apothecis  excessive  weight.  In  Aristotle's 
suis   aggregat.  .   .   .  Apothecarius  History  of  Animals   (IX,  13)  the 


130 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      cukvT 


Galen's 
private 
supply  of 
drugs : 
terra 
sigillata. 


perience  as  imperial  physician.  An  assignment  of  the  spice 
sent  to  Marcus  AureHus  from  the  land  of  the  barbarians 
(kKTTJs  ^ap^apov)  was  superior  to  what  had  stood  stored  in 
wooden  jars  from  the  reigns  of  Trajan,  Hadrian,  and  An- 
toninus Pius.  Commodus  exhausted  all  the  recent  supply, 
and  when  Galen  was  forced  to  turn  to  what  had  been  on 
hand  in  preparing  an  antidote  for  Severus,  he  found  it  much 
weaker  than  before,  although  not  thirty  years  had  elapsed. 
That  cinnamon  was  a  commodity  little  known  to  the  popu- 
lace is  indicated  by  Galen's  mentioning  his  loss  in  the  fire 
of  192  of  a  few  precious  bits  of  bark  he  had  stored  away 
in  a  chest  with  other  treasures.^  He  praises  the  Severi, 
however,  for  permitting  others  to  use  theriac,  a  noted  medi- 
cine and  antidote  of  which  we  shall  have  more  to  say  pres- 
ently. Thus,  he  says,  not  only  have  they  as  emperors  re- 
ceived power  from  the  gods,  but  in  sharing  their  goods 
freely  they  are  like  the  gods,  who  rejoice  the  more,  the 
more  people  they  save." 

Galen  himself,  and  apparently  other  physicians,  were  not 
content  to  rely  for  medicines  either  upon  the  unguent-sellers 
or  the  bounty  of  the  imperial  stores.  Galen  stored  away  oil 
and  fat  and  left  them  to  age  until  he  had  enough  to  last  for 
a  hundred  years,  including  some  from  his  father's  lifetime. 
He  used  some  forty  years  old  in  one  prescription.^  He  also 
traveled  to  many  parts  of  the  Roman  Empire  and  procured 
rare  drugs  in  the  places  where  they  were  produced.  Very 
interesting  is  his  account  of  going  out  of  his  way  in  jour- 
neying back  and  forth  between  Rome  and  Pergamum  in 
order  to  stop  at  Lemnos  and  procure  a  supply  of  the  famous 
terra  sigillata,  a  reddish  clay  stamped  into  pellets  with  the 
sacred  seal  of  Diana.*  On  the  way  to  Rome,  instead  of 
journeying  on  foot  through  Thrace  and  Macedonia,  he  took 
ship  from  the  Troad  to  Thessalonica ;  but  the  vessel  stopped 

nests  are  shot  down  with  arrows  *  Kiihn,   XIV,  64-66. 

tipped  with  lead.     For  other  allu-  ^^./j  Pisoncm  dc  theriaca,  Kiihn, 

sions    to    the    cinnamon    bird    in  XIV,  217. 

classical  literature  see  D'Arcy  W.  j    ' ...        vttt 

Thompson,   A   Glossary   of  Greek  ^"""'   -^^^^'   704- 

5iVrfj,  Oxford,  1895,  p.  82.  "Kuhn,    XII,    168-78. 


IV  GALEN  131 

in  Lemnos  at  Myrine  on  the  wrong  side  of  the  island,  which 
Galen  had  not  realized  possessed  more  than  one  port,  and 
the  captain  would  not  delay  the  voyage  long  enough  to  en- 
able him  to  cross  the  island  to  the  spot  where  the  terra 
sigillata  was  to  be  found.  Upon  his  return  from  Rome 
through  Macedonia,  however,  he  took  pains  to  visit  the  right 
port,  and  for  the  benefit  of  future  travelers  gives  careful 
instructions  concerning  the  route  to  follow  and  the  distances 
between  stated  points.  He  describes  the  solemn  procedure 
by  which  the  priestess  from  the  neighboring  city  gathered 
the  red  earth  from  the  hill  where  it  was  found,  sacrificing 
no  animals,  but  wheat  and  barley  to  the  earth.  He  brought 
away  with  him  some  twenty  thousand  of  the  little  discs  or 
seals  which  were  supposed  to  cure  even  lethal  poisons  and 
the  bite  of  mad  dogs.  The  inhabitants  laughed,  however, 
at  the  assertion  which  Galen  had  read  in  Dioscorides  that 
the  seals  were  made  by  mixing  the  blood  of  a  goat  with  the 
earth.  Berthelot,  the  historian  of  chemistry,  believed  that 
this  earth  was  "an  oxide  of  iron  more  or  less  hydrated  and 
impure."^     In  another  passage  Galen  advises  his  readers, 

*  M.  Berthelot,  "Sur  les  voyages  had     replaced     the     priestess     of 

de  Galien  et  de  Zosime  dans  I'Ar-  Diana.     Pierre  Belon  witnessed  it 

chipel  et  en  Asie,  et  sur  la  matiere  on  August  6th,  1533.    By  that  time 

medicale      dans      I'antiquite,"      in  there  were  many  varieties  of  the 

Journal   dcs   Savants    (1895),    PP-  tablets,     "because     each     lord     of 

382-7.     The  article  is   chiefly  de-  Lemnos     had     a     distinct     seal." 

voted  to  showing  that  an  alchem-  When    Tozer    visited    Lemnos    in 

istic  treatise  attributed  to  Zosimus  1890  the  ceremony  was  still  per- 

copies  Galen's  account  of  his  trips  formed  annually  on  August  sixth 

to  Lemnos  and  Cyprus.     Of  such  and    must    be    completed    before 

future  copying  of  Galen  we  shall  sunrise  or  the  earth  would  lose  its 

encounter  many  more  instances.  efficacy.      Mohammedan     khodjas 

As  for  the  terra  sigillata,  C.  J.  now  shared  in  the  religious  cere- 
S.  Thompson,  in  a  paper  on  mony,  sacrificing  a  lamb.  But 
"Terra  Sigillata,  a  famous  medi-  in  the  twentieth  century  the  en- 
cament  of  ancient  times,"  pub-  tire  ceremony  was  abandoned, 
lished  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Through  the  early  modern  cen- 
Seventeenth  International  Con-  turies  the  terra  sigillata  continued 
gress  of  Medical  Sciences.  Lon-  to  be  held  in  high  esteem  in 
don,  1913,  Section  XXIII,  pp.  western  Europe  also,  and  was  in- 
433-44,  tells  of  various  medieval  eluded  in  pharmacopeias  as  late  as 
substitutes  for  the  Lemnian  earth  1833  and  1848.  Thompson  gives  a 
from  other  places,  and  of  the  in-  chemical  analysis  of  a  sixteenth 
teresting_  religious  ceremony,  per-  century  tablet  of  the  Lemnian 
formed  in  the  presence  of  the  earth  and  finds  no  evidence  there- 
Turkish  officials  on  only  one  day  in  of  its  possessing  any  medicinal 
in  the  year  by  Greek  monks  who  property. 


132 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


Mediter- 
ranean 
commerce. 


if  they  are  ever  in  Pamphylia,  to  lay  in  a  good  supply  of 
the  drug  carpesiiim.^  In  the  ninth  book  of  his  work  on 
medicinal  simples  he  tells  of  three  strata  of  sory,  chalcite, 
and  misy,  which  he  had  seen  in  a  mine  in  Cyprus  thirty 
years  before  and  from  which  he  had  brought  away  a  sup- 
ply, and  of  the  surprising  chemical  change  which  the  misy 
underwent  in  the  course  of  these  years. ^ 

Galen  speaks  of  receiving  other  drugs  from  Great  Syria, 
Palestine,  Egypt,  Cappadocia,  Pontus,  Macedonia,  Gaul, 
Spain,  and  Mauretania,  from  the  Celts,  and  even  from  In- 
dia.^ He  names  other  places  in  Greece  and  Asia  Minor  than 
Mount  Hymettus  where  good  honey  may  be  had,  and  states 
that  much  so-called  Attic  honey  is  really  from  the  Cyclades, 
although  it  is  brought  to  Athens  and  there  sold  or  reshipped. 
Similarly,  genuine  Falernian  wine  is  produced  only  in  a  small 
part  of  Italy,  but  other  wines  like  it  are  prepared  by  those 
who  are  skilled  in  such  knavery.  As  the  best  iris  is  that  of 
Illyricum  and  the  best  asphalt  is  from  Judea,  so  the  best 
petroselinon  is  that  of  Macedonia,  and  merchants  export  it 
to  almost  the  entire  world  just  as  they  do  Attic  honey  and 
Falernian  wine.  But  the  petroselinon  crop  of  Epirus  is  sent 
to  Thessalonica  and  there  passed  off  for  Macedonian.  The 
best  turpentine  is  that  of  Chios  but  a  good  variety  may  be 
obtained  from  Libya  or  Pontus.  The  manufacture  of  drugs 
has  spread  recently  as  well  as  the  commerce  in  them.    The 


Agricola  in  the  sixteenth  cen- 
tury wrote  in  his  work  on  mining 
{De  re  metal.,  ed.  Hoover,  1912, 
II,  31),  "It  is,  however,  very  little 
to  be  wondered  at  that  the  hill  in 
the  Island  of  Lemnos  was  exca- 
vated, for  the  whole  is  of  a 
reddish-yellow  color  which  fur- 
nishes for  the  inhabitants  that 
valuable  clay  so  especially  bene- 
ficial to  mankind." 

'Kiihn,  XIV,  72. 

'Kiihn,  XII,  226-9.  See  the 
article  of  Berthelot  just  cited  in 
a  preceding  note  for  an  explana- 
tion of  the  three  names  and  of 
Galen's  experience.     Mr.  Hoover, 


in  his  translation  of  Agricola's 
work  on  metallurgy  (1912),  pp. 
573-4,  says,  "It  is  desirable  here 
to  enquire  into  the  nature  of  the 
substances  given  by  all  of  the  old 
mineralogists  under  the  Latinized 
Greek  terms,  chalcitis,  misy,  sory, 
and  melanteria."  He  cites  Dios- 
corides  (V,  75-77)  and  Pliny 
(NH,  XXXIV,  29-31)  on  the  sub- 
ject, but  not  Galen.  Yule  (1903) 
I,  126,  notes  that  Marco  Polo's 
account  of  Tutia  and  Spodium 
"reads  almost  like  a  condensed 
translation  of  Galen's  account  of 
Fompliolyx  and  Spodos." 

'Kiihn.  XIV,  7-8;  XIII,  41 1-2; 
XII,  215-6. 


IV  GALEN  133 

best  form  of  unguent  was  formerly  made  only  in  Laodicea, 
but  now  it  is  similarly  compounded  in  many  other  cities  of 
Asia  Minor.^ 

We  are  reminded  that  parts  of  animals  as  well  as  herbs  Frauds  of 
and  minerals  were  important  constituents  in  ancient  phar-   j,^^^^^^ 
macy  by  Galen's  invective  against  the   frauds  of  hunters   beasts, 
and  dealers  in  wild  beasts  as  well  as  of  unguent-sellers. 
They  do  not  hunt  them  at  the  proper  season  for  securing 
their  medicinal  virtues,  but  when  they  are  no  longer  in 
their  prime  or  just  after  their  long  period  of  hibernation, 
when  they  are  emaciated.     Then  they   fatten  them  upon 
improper  food,  feed  them  barley  cakes  to  stuff  up  and  dull 
their  teeth,  or  force  them  to  bite  frequently  so  that  virus 
will  run  out  of  their  mouths.^ 

Besides  the  ancient  drug  trade,  Galen  gives  us  some  in-  Galen's 
teresting  glimpses  of  the  publishing  trade,  if  we  may  so  _ 

term  it,  of  his  time.  Writing  in  old  age  in  the  De  methodo  ity. 
medendi,^  he  says  that  he  has  never  attached  his  name  to  one 
of  his  works,  never  written  for  the  popular  ear  or  for  fame, 
but  fired  by  zeal  for  science  and  truth,  or  at  the  urgent  re- 
quest of  friends,  or  as  a  useful  exercise  for  himself,  or,  as 
now,  in  order  to  forget  his  old  age.  Popular  fame  is  only 
an  impediment  to  those  who  desire  to  live  tranquilly  and 
enjoy  the  fruits  of  philosophy.  He  asks  Eugenianus,  whom 
he  addresses  in  this  passage,  not  to  praise  him  immoderately 
before  men,  as  he  has  been  wont  to  do,  and  not  to  inscribe 
his  name  in  his  works.  His  friends  nevertheless  prevailed 
upon  him  to  write  two  treatises  Hsting  his  works,'*  and  he 
also  is  free  enough  in  many  of  his  books  in  mentioning 
others  which  are  essential  to  read  before  perusing  the  pres- 
ent volume.^  Perhaps  he  felt  differently  at  different  times 
on  the  question  of  fame  and  anonymity.     He  also  objected 

*Kuhn,      XIV,      22-23,      77-78;  *  irepi  T03V  iSluv  Pi^\luv,Ku\\n,  XIX, 

XIII,    119.  Sff. ;    and   irtpi  rns  Tdfecjs    rcof  iSiojy 

'  Kuhn,  XIV,  255-56.    The  beasts  /3i)3Xico;^,  XIX,_49  ff. 

of  course  were  also  in  demand  for  °  See,    for    instance,    in    the    De 

the  arena.  methodo  medcndi  itself,  X,  895-96 

'  Kiihn,  X,  456-57,  opening  pas-  and  955. 
sage  of  the  seventh  book. 


134  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

to  those  who  read  his  works,  not  to  learn  anything  from 
them,  but  only  in  order  to  calumniate  them.^ 
The  It  was  in  a  shop  on  the  Sacra  Via  that  most  of  the  copies 

book"*        of  some  of  Galen's  works  were  stored  when  they,  together 
trade.  with  the  great  libraries  upon  the  Palatine,  were  consumed 

in  the  fire  of  192.  But  in  another  passage  Galen  states  that 
the  street  of  the  Sandal-makers  is  where  most  of  the  book- 
stores in  Rome  are  located.^  There  he  saw  some  men  dis- 
puting whether  a  certain  treatise  was  his.  It  was  duly  in- 
scribed Galenus  mediais  and  one  man,  because  the  title 
was  unfamiliar  to  him,  bought  it  as  a  new  work  by  Galen. 
But  another  man  who  was  something  of  a  philologer  asked 
to  see  the  introduction,  and,  after  reading  a  few  lines,  de- 
clared that  the  book  was  not  one  of  Galen's  works.  When 
Galen  was  still  young,  he  wrote  three  commentaries  on  the 
throat  and  lungs  for  a  fellow  student  who  wished  to  have 
something  to  pass  off  as  his  own  work  upon  his  return 
home.  This  friend  died,  however,  and  the  books  got  into 
circulation.^  Galen  also  complains  that  notes  of  his  lec- 
tures which  he  has  not  intended  for  publication  have  got 
abroad,*  that  his  servants  have  stolen  and  published  some 
of  his  manuscripts,  and  that  others  have  been  altered,  cor- 
rupted, and  mutilated  by  those  into  whose  possession  they 
have  come,  or  have  been  passed  off  by  them  in  other  lands 
as  their  own  productions.^  On  the  other  hand,  some  of  his 
pupils  keep  his  teachings  to  themselves  and  are  unwilling  to 
give  others  the  benefit  of  them,  so  that  if  they  should  die 
suddenly,  his  doctrines  would  be  lost.^  But  his  own  ideal 
has  always  been  to  share  his  knowledge  freely  with  those 
who  sought  it,  and  if  possible  with  all  mankind.  At  least 
one  of  Galen's  works  was  taken  down  from  his  dictation  by 
short-hand  writers,  when,  after  his  convincing  demonstra- 
tion by  dissection  concerning  respiration  and  the  voice, 
Boethus  asked  him  for  commentaries  on  the  subject  and 

'Kiihn,    XIV,    651:    henceforth  '11,217. 

this   text    will   generally   be   cited  *XIX,  9. 

without  name.  "XIX,  41. 

'XIX,  8.  "11,283. 


IV 


GALEN 


135 


sent  for  stenographers.^  Although  Galen  in  his  travels 
often  purchased  and  carried  home  with  him  large  quantities 
of  drugs,  when  he  made  his  first  trip  to  Rome  he  left  all  his 
books  in  Asia.^ 

Galen  dates  the  falsification  of  title  pages  and  contents 
of  books  back  to  the  time  when  kings  Ptolemy  of  Egypt 
and  Attains  of  Pergamum  were  bidding  against  each  other 
for  volumes  for  their  respective  libraries.^  Works  were 
often  interpolated  then  in  order  to  make  them  larger  and 
so  bring  a  better  price.  Galen  speaks  more  than  once  of 
the  deplorable  ease  with  which  numbers,  signs,  and  other 
abbreviations  are  altered  in  manuscripts.*  A  single  stroke 
of  the  pen  or  slight  erasure  will  completely  change  the  mean- 
ing of  a  medical  prescription.  He  thinks  that  such  altera- 
tions are  sometimes  malicious  and  not  mere  mistakes.  So 
common  were  they  that  Menecrates  composed  a  medical 
work  written  out  entirely  in  complete  words  and  entitled 
Autocrat  or  H  ologrammatos  because  it  was  also  dedicated  to 
the  emperor.  Another  writer,  Damocrates,  from  whom 
Galen  often  quotes  long  passages,  composed  his  book  of 
medicaments  in  metrical  form  so  that  there  might  be  no 
mistake  made  even  in  complete  words. 

Galen's  works  contain  occasional  historical  information 
concerning  many  other  matters  than  books  and  drugs.  Clin- 
ton in  his  Fasti  Roniani  made  much  use  of  Galen  for  the 
chronology  of  the  period  in  which  he  lived.  His  allusions 
to  several  of  the  emperors  with  whom  he  had  personal  re- 
lations are  valuable  bits  of  source-material.  Trajan  was, 
of  course,  before  his  time,  but  he  testifies  to  the  great  im- 
provement of  the  roads  in  Italy  which  that  emperor  had 
effected.^     Galen  sheds  a  little  light  on  the  vexed  question 


Falsifica- 
tion and 
mistakes 
in  manu- 
scripts. 


Galen  as  a 

historical 

source. 


'  XIV,  630. 

'  XIX,  34. 

"XV,   109. 

*XIII,  995-96;  XIV,  31-32. 

'X,  633.  Duruy  refers  to  the 
passage  in  his  History  of  Rome 
(ed._  J.  P.  Mahafify,  Boston,  1886, 
V,  i,  273),  but  says,  "Extensive 
sanitary    works    were    undertaken 


throughout  all  Italy,  and  the  cele- 
brated Galen,  who  was  almost  a 
contemporary,  extols  their  happy 
effects  upon  the  public  health." 
But  Galen  does  not  have  sanitary 
considerations  especially  in  mind, 
since  he  mentions  Trajan's  road- 
building  only  by  way  of  illustra- 
tion, comparing  his  own  systematic 


136  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

of  the  population  of  the  empire,  if  Pergamum  is  the  place 

he  refers  to  in  his  estimate  of  forty  thousand  citizens  or  one 

hundred  and  twenty  thousand  inhabitants,  including  women 

and  slaves  but  perhaps  not  children.^ 

Ancient  Galen  illustrates  for  us  the  evils  of  ancient  slavery  in 

slavery.  .      .  .  .... 

an  incident  which  he  relates  to  show  the  inadvisability  of 

giving  way  to  one's  passions,  especially  anger.^  Returning 
from  Rome,  Galen  fell  in  with  a  traveler  from  Gortyna  in 
Crete.  When  they  reached  Corinth,  the  Cretan  sent  his 
baggage  and  slaves  from  Cenchrea^  to  Athens  by  boat,  but 
himself  with  a  hired  vehicle  and  two  slaves  went  by  land 
with  Galen  through  Megara,  Eleusis,  and  Thriasa.  On  the 
way  the  Cretan  became  so  angry  at  the  two  slaves  that  he 
hit  them  with  his  sheathed  sword  so  hard  that  the  sheath 
broke  and  they  were  badly  wounded.  Fearing  that  they 
would  die,  he  then  made  off  to  escape  the  consequences  of 
his  act,  leaving  Galen  to  look  after  the  wounded.  But  later 
he  rejoined  Galen  in  penitent  mood  and  insisted  that  Galen 
administer  a  beating  to  him  for  his  cruelty.  Galen  adds 
that  he  himself,  like  his  father,  had  never  struck  a  slave 
with  his  own  hand  and  had  reproved  friends  who  had  broken 
their  slaves'  teeth  with  blows  of  their  fists.  Others  go  far- 
ther and  kick  their  slaves  or  gouge  their  eyes  out.  The  em- 
peror Hadrian  in  a  moment  of  anger  is  said  to  have  blinded 
a  slave  with  a  stylus  which  he  had  in  his  hand.  He,  too,  was 
sorry  afterwards  and  offered  the  slave  money,  but  the  latter 
refused  it,  telling  the  emperor  that  nothing  could  compen- 
sate him  for  the  loss  of  an  eye.  In  another  passage  Galen 
discusses  how  many  slaves  and  "clothes"  one  really  needs.* 

treatment  of  medicine  to  the  em-  now   deserted    and   beset   by  wild 

peror's    great    work    in    repairing  beasts    so    that    they    would    pass 

and  improving  the  roads,  straight-  through  populous  towns  and  more 

ening  them  by  cut-offs  that  saved  frequented     areas.     The     passage 

distance,  but  sometimes  abandon-  thus   bears   witness  to   a   shifting 

ing  an  old  road  that  went  straight  of  population, 

over  hills  for  an  easier  route  that  ^V,    49. 

avoided  them,   filling   in   wet  and  ^  V,  17-19. 

marshy  spots  with  stone  or  cross-  ^  Mentioned    in   Acts,   xviii,    18, 

ing  them   by   causeways,  bridging  ".  .  .  having    shorn    his    head    in 

impassable     rivers,     and     altering  Cenchrea :  for  he  had  a  vow." 

routes    that    led    through    places  *V,  46-47. 


IV  GALEN  137 

Galen  also  depicts  the  easy-going,  sociable,  and  pleasure-  Social 
loving  society  of  his  time.  Not  only  physicians  but  men  gen-  ^nd  wine 
erally  begin  the  day  with  salutations  and  calls,  then  separate 
again,  some  to  the  market-place  and  lavvr  courts,  others  to 
v^atch  the  dancers  or  charioteers.^  Others  play  at  dice  or 
pursue  love  affairs,  or  pass  the  hours  at  the  baths  or  in  eat- 
ing and  drinking  or  some  other  bodily  pleasure.  In  the 
evening  they  all  come  together  again  at  symposia  w^hich  bear 
no  resemblance  to  the  intellectual  feasts  of  Socrates  and 
Plato  but  are  mere  drinking  bouts.  Galen  had  no  objection, 
however,  to  the  use  of  wine  in  moderation  and  mentions  the 
varieties  from  different  parts  of  the  Mediterranean  world 
which  were  especially  noted  for  their  medicinal  properties.^ 
He  believed  that  drinking  wine  discreetly  relieved  the  mind 
from  all  worry  and  melancholy  and  refreshed  it.  *'For  we 
use  it  every  day."  ^  He  affirmed  that  taken  in  moderation 
wine  aided  digestion  and  the  blood. ^  He  classed  wine  with 
such  boons  to  humanity  as  medicines,  "a  sober  and  decent 
mode  of  life,"  and  "the  study  of  literature  and  liberal  dis- 
ciplines." ^  Galen's  treatise  in  three  books  on  food  values 
{De  aliment oriim  faculfatibus)  supplies  information  con- 
cerning the  ancient  table  and  dietary  science. 

Galen's  allusions  to  Judaism  and  Christianity  are  of  con-  Allusions 
siderable  interest.     He  scarcely  seems  to  have  distinguished  and  ChriT- 
between  them.    In  two  passages  in  his  treatise  on  differences  tianity. 
in  the  pulse  he  makes  incidental  allusion  to  the  followers  of 
Moses  and  Christ,  in  both  cases  speaking  of  them  rather 
lightly,  not  to  say  contemptuously.      In  criticizing  Archi- 
genes  for  using  vague  and  unintelligible  language  and  not 
giving  a  sufficient   explanation  of   the  point   in  question, 
Galen  says  that  it  is  "as  if  one  had  come  to  a  school  of 

^X,   3-4.  Tralles,    "He    has    in    most    dis- 

*X,  831-36;  XIII,  513;  XIV,  27-  tempers  a  separate  article  concern- 

29,  and   14-19  on  the  heating  and  ing     wine     and     I     much     doubt 

storage  of  wine.  whether  there  be  in  all  nature  a 

3  jv    ^^.7  .rr,  "lO""^  excellent  medicine  than  this 

iv,  77/-/y.  in    the    hands    of    a    skillful    and 

*  Similarly    Milward    (1733),    p.  judicious  practitioner." 
102,     wrote     of      Alexander     of  "IV,   821. 


138  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

Moses  and  Christ  and  had  heard  undemonstrated  laws."^ 
And  in  criticizing  opposing  sects  for  their  obstinacy  he  re- 
marks that  it  would  be  easier  to  win  over  the  followers  of 
Moses  and  Christ.^     Later  we  shall  speak  more  fully  of  a 
third  passage  in  De  iisu  partium^  where  Galen  criticizes  the 
Mosaic  view  of  the  relation  of  God  to  nature,  representing 
it  as  the  opposite  extreme  to  the  Epicurean  doctrine  of  a 
purely  mechanistic  and  materialistic  universe.     This   sug- 
gests that  Galen  had  read  some  of  the  Old  Testament,  but 
he  might  have  learned  from  other  sources  of  the  Dead  Sea 
and  of  salts  of  Sodom,  of  which  he  speaks  in  yet  another 
context.^     According  to  a  thirteenth  century  Arabian  biog- 
rapher of  Galen,  he  spoke  more  favorably  of  Christians  in 
a  lost  commentary  upon  Plato's  Republic,  admiring  their 
morals  and  admitting  their  miracles.^    This  last,  as  we  shall 
see,  is  unlikely,  since  Galen  believed  in  a  supreme  Being  who 
worked  only  through  natural  law.  "A  confection  ol  loachos, 
the  martyr  or  metropolitan,"  and  "A  remedy  for  headache 
of  the  monk  Barlama"  occur  in  the  third  book  of  the  De 
remediis  parabilihus  ascribed  to  Galen,  but  this  third  book 
is  greatly  interpolated  or  entirely  spurious,   citing  Galen 
himself  as  well  as  Alexander  of  Tralles,  the  sixth  century 
writer,  and  mentioning  the  Saracens.    Wellmann  regards  it 
as  composed  between  the  seventh  and  eleventh  centuries  of 
our  era.'' 

Like  most  thoughtful  men  of  his  time,  Galen  tended  to 
believe  in  one  supreme  deity,  but  he  appears  to  have  derived 

*  Ktihn,  VIII,  579,   ws  eij  Mwi)o-ou  above     passages.        Particula    24 

Kal  Xpiarov  diarpitiriv  &<f)iyfj.evos  voncop  (56),    "medici   et   philosophi    cum 

ivawoSeiKTOiP  aKouri.  aere    augmentati    non    sunt    pre- 

'  Ibid.,  p.  6s7,0aTTovyap  &PTISTOVS  parati  ad  disciplinam  sicut  parati 

inrdMuvaovKalXpLarou  ixtTa5i56.^€i(v..'  fuerunt  ad   disciplinam  moysis  et 

I  have  been  unable  to  find  a  pas-  christi  socii  predictorum.  decimo- 

sage  in  which,  according  to  Moses  tercio  megapulsus." 

Maimonides    of    the    twelfth   cen-  » Kiihn,  III,  905-7. 

tmy  in  h\s  Aphorisms  iroiTi  Galen,  ,^^^       ^j     ^            XII,    372-5. 

Galen  said  that  the  wealthy  phy-  5  t-  1                ro  A                 o 

sicians    and    philosophers    of    his  ^^  F.nlayson      (1895)  ;     PP-     8-9; 

time  were  not  prepared  for  disci-  Uarmck     Medtcimsches   aus   der 

pline    as    were    the    followers    of  altcstav   Kirchengeschichte,   Leip- 

Moses  and  Christ.     Perhaps  it  is  ^ig,  1892. 

a    mistranslation    of    one    of    the  ®  Wellmann    (1914),  P-   16  note. 


IV 


GALEN  139 


this  conception  from  Greek  rather  than  Hebraic  sources. 
It  was  to  philosophy  and  the  Greek  mysteries  that  he  turned 
for  revelation  of  the  deity,  as  we  shall  see.  Hopeless  crim- 
inals were  for  him  those  whom  neither  the  Muses  nor  Soc- 
rates could  reform.^  It  is  Plato,  not  Christ,  whom  in  an- 
other treatise  he  cites  as  describing  the  first  and  greatest 
God  as  ungenerated  and  good.  "And  we  all  naturally  love 
Him,  being  such  as  He  is  from  eternity."  ^ 

But  while  Galen's  monotheism  cannot  be  regarded  as  of  Galen's 
Christian  or  Jewish  origin,  it  is  possible  that  his  argument  readers^" 
from  design  and  supporting  theology  by  anatomy  made  him 
more  acceptable  to  both  Mohammedan  and  Christian  read- 
ers. At  any  rate  he  had  Christian  readers  at  Rome  at  the 
opening  of  the  third  century,  when  a  hostile  controversialist 
complains  that  some  of  them  even  worship  Galen.^  These 
early  Christian  enthusiasts  for  natural  science,  who  also  de- 
voted much  time  to  Aristotle  and  Euclid,  were  finally  ex- 
communicated; but  Aristotle,  Euclid,  and  Galen  were  to 
return  in  triumph  in  medieval  learning. 

II.     His  Medicine  and  Experimental  Science 

Galen  held  as  his  fundamental  theory  of  nature  the  view   Four 
which  was  to  prevail  through  the  middle  ages,  that  all  nat-   and  four 
ural  objects  upon  this  globe  are  composed  of  four  elements,   qualities, 
earth,  air,  fire,  and  water,^  and  the  cognate  view,  which  he 
says  Hippocrates  first  introduced  and  Aristotle  later  dem- 
onstrated, that  all  natural  objects  are  characterized  by  four 
qualities,  hot,  cold,  dry,  and  moist.    From  the  combinations 
of   these   four  are  produced  various   secondary  quaHties.^ 
Neither  hypothesis  was  as  yet  universally  accepted,  however, 
and  Galen  felt  it  incumbent  upon  him  to  argue  against  those 

^Kiihn,   IV,  816.  *Kuhn,   X,    16-17.     J.   Leminne, 

'  Kiihn,  IV,  815.  Les  quatre  elements,  in  Memoires 

'Quoted    by    Eusebius,    V,    28,  couronnes      par      I Academie      de 

and      reproduced      by      Harnack,  Bclgique,  vol.   65,    Brussels,    1903, 

Medicinisches     aus     der     dltestcn  traces  the  influence  of  the  theory 

Kirchengeschichte,  1892,  p.  41,  and  in  medieval  thought. 

by  Finlayson  (1895),  pp.  9-10.  *  Kuhn,  XIII,  763-4. 


140 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Criticism 
of  atom- 
ism. 


Applica- 
tion of  the 
theory  of 
four  quali- 
ties in 
medicine. 


who  contended  that  the  human  body  and  world  of  nature 
were  made  from  but  one  element.^  There  were  others  who 
ridiculed  the  four  quality  hypothesis,  saying  that  hot  and 
cold  were  words  for  bath-keepers,  not  for  physicians  to  deal 
with. 2  Galen  explains  that  philosophers  do  not  regard 
any  particular  variety  of  earth  or  any  other  mineral  sub- 
stance as  representing  the  pure  element  earth,  which  in  the 
philosophical  sense  is  an  extremely  cold  and  dry  substance 
to  which  adamant  and  rocks  make  perhaps  the  closest  ap- 
proach.  But  the  earths  that  we  see  are  all  compound  bodies.^ 

Galen  rejected  the  atomism  of  Democritus  and  Epicurus, 
in  which  the  atoms  were  indivisible  particles  dififering  in 
shape  and  size,  but  not  differing  in  quality  as  chemical  atoms 
are  supposed  to  do.  He  credits  Democritus  with  the  view 
that  such  qualities  as  color  and  taste  are  sensed  by  us  from 
the  concourse  of  atoms,  but  do  not  reside  in  the  atoms  them- 
selves.* Galen  also  makes  the  criticism  that  the  mere  re- 
grouping of  "impassive  and  immutable"  atoms  is  not  enough 
to  account  for  the  new  properties  of  the  compound,  which 
are  often  very  different  from  those  of  the  constituents,  as 
when  "we  alter  the  qualities  of  medicines  in  artificial  mix- 
tures." ^  Thus  he  virtually  says  that  the  purely  physical 
atomism  of  Democritus  will  not  account  for  what  today  we 
call  chemical  change.  He  also,  as  we  shall  see,  rejected  Epi- 
curus' theory  of  a  world  of  nature  ruled  by  blind  chance. 

Galen  of  course  thought  that  a  dry  medicine  was  good 
for  a  moist  disease,  and  that  in  a  compound  medicine,  by 
mixing  a  very  cold  with  a  slightly  cold  drug  in  varying  pro- 
portions a  medicine  of  any  desired  degree  of  coldness  might 
be  obtained.*^  In  general  he  regarded  solids  like  stones  and 
metals  as  dry  and  cold,  while  he  thought  that  hot  and  moist 
objects  tended  to  evaporate  rapidly  into  air.'^  So  he  de- 
clared that  dryness  of  solid  bodies  was  incurable,  while  he 
believed  that  children's  bodies  were  more  easily  dissolved 

*Kiihn,  I,  428.  "XIV,  250-53. 

*Kiihn,   X,    iii.  «yttt    o^q 
"Kuhn,    XII,    166.  ^"^'  ^^• 

*I,  417.  'X,  657. 


IV  GALEN  141 

than  adults'  because  moister  and  warmer.^  The  Stoics  and 
many  physicians  believed  that  heat  prolonged  life,  but  As- 
clepiades  pointed  out  that  the  Ethiopians  are  old  at  thirty 
because  the  hot  sun  dries  up  their  bodies  so,  while  the  in- 
habitants of  Britain  sometimes  live  to  be  one  hundred  and 
twenty  years  old.  This  last,  however,  was  regarded  as  prob- 
ably due  to  the  fact  that  their  thicker  skins  conserved  their 
innate  heat  longer.^ 

As  an  offset  to  the  evidence  which  will  be  presented  later   Galen's 
of  the  traces  of   occult  virtues,   magic,   and   astrology   in  tics'^obso- 
Galen's  therapeutics  I  should  like  to  be  able  to  indicate  the   lete. 
good  points  in  it.    But  his  entire  system,  like  the  four  qual- 
ity theory  upon  which  it  is  largely  based,  seems  now  obso- 
lete, and  what  evidenced  his  superiority  to  other  physicians 
in  his  own  day  would  probably  strike  the  modern  reader 
only  as  a  token  of  his  distinct  inferiority  to  present  practice. 
Eighty  odd  years  of  modern  medical  progress  since  have 
added  further  emphasis  to  Daremberg's  declaration  that  we 
have   had  to  throw  overboard   "much  of   his  physiology, 
nearly  all  of  his  pathology  and  general  therapeutics."  ^ 

Nevertheless,  we  may  note  a  few  specimens  which  per-    Some  of 
haps    represent   his   ordinary   theory   and   practice   as   dis-    cal  no- 
tinguished  from  passages  in  which  the  influence  of  magic   ^'°"^" 
enters.     He  holds  that  bleeding  and  cold  drink  are  the  two 
chief  remedies  for  fever.*    He  notes  that  children  occasion- 
ally resemble  their  grandparents  rather  than  their  parents.^ 
He  disputes  the  assertion  of  Epicurus — one  by  which  some 
of  his  followers  failed  to  be  guided — that  there  is  no  benefit 
to  health  in  Aphrodite,  and  contends  that  at  certain  intervals 
and  in  certain  individuals  and  circumstances  sexual  inter- 
course is  beneficial.*^     His  discussion  of  anodynes  and  stu- 
por or  sleep-producing  medicines  shows  that  the  ancients 
had  anaesthetics  of  a  sort.'^     He  recognized  the  importance 

X,  872.  dcs   Klandios    Galcnos,    1894,    204 

'XIX,    344-45-  pp. 

More  recently  Galen's  Materia  *  X,  624. 

medico   has  been  treated  of   in  a  "  XIV,  253-54. 

German    doctoral    dissertation    by  °  V,  911. 

L.  Israelson,  Die   materia   medica  'X.  817-IQ. 


142  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

of  breathing  plenty  of  fresh,  invigorating,  and  unpolluted 
air,  free  from  any  intermixture  of  impurity  from  mines, 
pits,  or  ovens,  or  of  putridity  from  decaying  vegetable  or 
animal  matter,  or  of  noxious  vapors  from  stagnant  water, 
swamps,  and  rivers.^  As  was  usual  in  ancient  and  medieval 
times,  he  attributes  plagues  to  the  corruption  of  the  air, 
which  poisons  men  breathing  it,  and  tells  how  Hippocrates 
tried  to  allay  a  plague  at  Athens  by  purifying  the  air  by 
fumigation  with  fires,  odors,  and  unguents.^ 
Two  of  Two  specimens  may  be  given  of  Galen's  accounts  of  his 

cases.  own  cases.     In  the  first,  some  cheese,  which  he  had  told  his 

servants  to  take  away  as  too  sharp,  when  mixed  with  boiled 
salt  pork  and  applied  to  the  joints,  proved  very  helpful  to  a 
gouty  patient  and  to  several  others  whom  he  induced  to  try 
it.^  In  the  second  case  Galen  administered  the  following 
heroic  treatment  to  a  woman  at  Rome  who  was  afflicted 
with  catarrh  to  the  point  of  throwing  up  blood.*  He  did  not 
deem  it  wise  to  bleed  her,  since  for  four  days  past  she  had 
gone  almost  without  food.  Instead  he  ordered  a  sharp 
clyster,  rubbed  and  bound  her  hands  and  feet  with  a  hot 
drug,  shaved  her  head  and  put  on  it  a  medicament  made  of 
doves'  dung.  After  three  hours  she  was  bathed,  care  being 
taken  that  nothing  oily  touched  her  head,  which  was  then 
covered  up.  At  first  he  fed  her  only  gruel,  afterwards  some 
bitter  autumn  fruit,  and  as  she  was  about  to  go  to  sleep  he 
administered  a  medicament  made  from  vipers  four  months 
before.  On  the  second  day  came  more  rubbing  and  binding 
except  the  head,  and  at  evening  a  somewhat  smaller  dose 
of  the  viper  remedy.  Again  she  slept  well  and  in  the  morn- 
ing he  gave  her  a  large  dose  of  cooked  honey.  Again  her 
body  was  well  rubbed  and  she  was  given  barley  water  and  a 
little  bread  to  eat.  On  the  fourth  day  an  older  and  therefore 
stronger  variety  of  viper- remedy  was  administered  and  her 
head  was  covered  with  the  same  medicament  as  before.  Its 
properties,  Galen  explains,  are  vehemently  drying  and  heat- 

*X,  843.  'XII,  270-71. 

'XIV,  281.  *X,  368-71. 


IV  GALEN  143 

ing.  Again  she  was  given  a  bath  and  a  little  food.  On  the 
fifth  day  Galen  ventured  to  purge  her  lungs,  but  he  returned 
at  intervals  to  the  imposition  upon  her  head.  Meanwhile 
he  continued  the  process  of  rubbing,  bathing,  and  dieting, 
until  finally  the  patient  was  well  again, — a  truly  remark- 
able cure ! 

These  two  cases,  however,  do  not  give  us  a  just  compre-  His  power 
hension  of  Galen's  abilities  at  their  best.     In  his  medical  obs«-va- 

practice  he  could  be  as  quick  and  comprehensive  an  observer  t'on  and 

inference, 
and  as  shrewd  in  drawing  inferences  from  what  he  observed 

as  the  famous  Sherlock  Holmes,  so  that  some  of  his  slower- 
witted  contemporaries  accused  him  of  possessing  the  gift 
of  divination.  His  immediate  diagnosis  of  the  case  of  the 
Sicilian  physician  by  noting  as  he  entered  the  house  the 
excrements  in  a  vessel  which  a  servant  was  carrying  out  to 
the  dungheap,  and  as  he  entered  the  sick-room  a  medicine 
set  on  the  window-sill  which  the  patient-physician  had  been 
preparing  for  himself,  amazed  the  patient  and  the  philo- 
sopher Glaucon^  more  than,  let  us  hope  in  this  case  in  view 
of  his  profession,  they  would  have  amazed  the  estimable  Dr. 
Watson. 

Puschmann  has  pointed  out  that  Galen  employs  certain  His  happy 
expressions  which  seem  happy  guesses  at  later  discoveries.  ^"^^^^^• 
He  writes :  "Galen  was  supported  in  his  researches  by  an 
extremely  happy  imaginative  faculty  which  put  the  proper 
word  in  his  mouth  even  in  cases  where  he  could  not  possibly 
arrive  at  a  full  understanding  of  the  matter, — where  he 
could  only  conjecture  the  truth.  When,  for  instance,  he 
declares  that  sound  is  carried  'like  a  wave'  (Kiihn,  HI,  644), 
or  expresses  the  conjecture  that  the  constituent  of  the  atmos- 
phere which  is  important  for  breathing  also  acts  by  burning 
(IV,  687),  he  expresses  thoughts  which  startle  us,  for  it 
was  only  possible  nearly  two  thousand  years  later  to  under- 
stand their  full  significance."^ 

'Kiihn,     VIII,     2,6^.     Finlayson  ^Puschmann    (iSgr),  pp.   105-6. 

(189s),  pp.  39-40,  gives  an  English  Vitruvius,  too,  however    (V,  iii), 

translation  of  Galen's  full  account  states  that  sound  spreads  in  waves' 

of  the  case.  like  eddies   in  a  pond. 


144 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Tendency 
towards 
scientific 
measure- 
ment. 


Psycho- 
logical 
tests  with 
the  pulse. 


Galen  was  keenly  alive  to  the  need  of  exactness  in 
weights  and  measurements.  He  often  criticizes  past  writers 
for  not  stating  precisely  what  ailment  the  medicament  rec- 
ommended is  good  for,  and  in  what  proportions  the  ingredi- 
ents are  to  be  mixed.  He  also  frequently  complains  be- 
cause they  do  not  specify  whether  they  are  using  the  Greek 
or  Roman  system  of  weights,  or  the  Attic,  Alexandrine,  or 
Ephesian  variety  of  a  certain  measure.-^  Moreover,  he  saw 
the  desirability  of  more  accurate  means  of  measuring  the 
passage  of  time.^  When  he  states  that  even  some  illustrious 
physicians  of  his  acquaintance  mistake  the  speed  of  the 
pulse  and  are  unable  to  tell  whether  it  is  slow,  fast,  or  nor- 
mal, we  begin  to  realize  something  of  the  difficulties  under 
which  medical  practice  and  any  sort  of  experimentation 
labored  before  watches  were  invented,  and  how  much  de- 
pended upon  the  accuracy  of  human  machinery  and  judg- 
ment. Yet  Galen  estimates  that  the  chief  progress  made 
in  medical  prognostication  since  Hippocrates  is  the  gradual 
development  of  the  art  of  inferring  from  the  pulse.^  Galen 
tried  to  improve  the  time-pieces  in  use  in  his  age.  He  states 
that  in  any  city  the  inhabitants  want  to  know  the  time  of 
day  accurately,  not  merely  conjecturally ;  and  he  gives  di- 
rections how  to  divide  the  day  into  twelve  hours  by  a  com- 
bination of  a  sun-dial  and  a  clepsydra,  and  how  on  the 
water  clock  to  mark  the  duration  of  the  longest,  shortest, 
and  equinoctial  days  of  the  year.^ 

Delicate  and  difficult  as  was  the  task  of  measuring  the 
pulse  in  Galen's  time,  he  was  clever  enough  to  anticipate  by 
seventeen  centuries  some  of  the  tests  which  modern  psy- 
chologists have  urged  should  be  applied  in  criminal  trials. 
He  detected  the  fact  that  a  female  patient  was  not  ill  but  in 
love  by  the  quickening  of  her  pulse  when  someone  came  in 
from  the  theater  and  announced  that  he  had  just  seen  Py- 


^XIII,  435,  893,  are  two  in- 
stances. 

»  V,  80 ;  XIV,  670. 

*  Various  treatises  on  the  pulse 
by  Galen  will  be  found  in  vols. 
V,  IX,  and  X  of  Kiihp's  edition. 


*  Galen's  contributions  to  the 
arts  of  clock-making  and  time- 
keeping have  been  dealt  with  in  an 
article  which  I  have  not  had  ac- 
cess to  and  of  which  I  cannot  now 
find  even  the  author  and  title. 


IV  GALEN  14s 

lades  dance.  When  she  came  again  the  next  day,  Galen  had 
purposely  arranged  that  someone  should  enter  and  say  that 
he  had  seen  Morphus  dancing.  This  and  a  similar  test  on 
the  third  day  produced  no  perceptible  quickening  in  the 
woman's  pulse.  But  it  bounded  again  when  on  the  fourth 
day  Pylades'  name  was  again  spoken.  After  recounting  an- 
other analogous  incident  where  he  had  been  able  to  read  the 
patient's  mind,  Galen  asks  why  former  physicians  have  never 
availed  themselves  of  these  methods.  He  thinks  that  they 
must  have  had  no  conception  of  how  the  bodily  health  in 
general  and  the  pulse  in  particular  can  be  affected  by  the 
"psyche's"  suffering.^  We  might  then  call  Galen  the  first 
experimental  psychologist  as  well  as  the  first  to  elaborate  the 
physiology  of  the  nervous  system. 

It  would  scarcely  be  fair  to  discuss  Galen's  science  at  Galen's 
all  without  saying  something  of  his  remarkable  work  in  anat-  an^^p^ysj, 
omy  and  physiology.  Daremberg  went  so  far  as  to  hold  ology. 
that  all  there  is  good  or  bad  in  his  writings  comes  from  good 
or  bad  physiology,  and  regarded  his  discussion  of  the  bones 
and  muscles  as  especially  good.^  He  is  generally  considered 
the  greatest  anatomist  of  antiquity,  but  it  is  barely  possible 
that  he  may  have  owed  more  to  predecessors  and  contem- 
poraries and  less  to  personal  research  than  is  apparent  from 
his  own  writings,  which  are  the  most  complete  anatomical 
treatises  that  have  reached  us  from  antiquity.  Herophilus, 
for  example,  who  was  born  at  Chalcedon  in  the  closing 
fourth  century  B.  C.  and  flourished  at  Alexandria  under 
the  first  Ptolemy,  discovered  the  nerves  and  distinguished 
them  from  the  sinews,  and  thought  the  brain  the  center  of 
the  nervous  system,  so  that  it  is  perhaps  questionable 
whether  Payne  is  justified  in  calling  Galen  "the  founder  of 
the  physiology  of  the  nervous  system,"  and  in  declaring  that 

*XIV,  631-34.  Muscular  Anatomy"  at  the  Inter- 

'  C.    V.    Daremberg,    Exposition  national      Congress     of      Medical 

des    connaissances   de    Galien   sur  Sciences  held  at  London  in  1913; 

I'anatomie,    la    physiologic,    et    la  see  pp.  389-400  of  the  volume  de- 

pathologie    du    systemc    nervcux,  voted  to  the  history  of  medicine, 

Paris,     1841.     J.     S.     Milne     dis-  Section  XXIII. 

cussed     "Galen's     Knowledge     of 


146  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

"in  physiological  diagnosis  he  stands  alone  among  the  an- 
cients." ^    However,  if  Galen  owed  something  to  Herophilus, 
we  owe  much  of  our  knowledge  of  the  earlier  physiologist 
to  Galen.^ 
Experi-  Aristotle  had  held  that  the  heart  was  the  seat  of  the  sen- 

Sss'ection.  sitive  soul  ^  and  the  source  of  nervous  action,  "while  the 
brain  was  of  secondary  importance,  being  the  coldest  part 
of  the  body,  devoid  of  blood,  and  having  for  its  chief  or 
only  function  to  cool  the  heart."  Galen  attacked  this  theory 
by  showing  experimentally  that  "all  the  nerves  originated 
in  the  brain,  either  directly  or  by  means  of  the  spinal  cord, 
which  he  thought  to  be  a  conducting  organ  merely,  not  a 
center."  "A  thousand  times,"  he  says,  "I  have  demon- 
strated by  dissection  that  the  cords  in  the  heart  called  nerves 
by  Aristotle  are  not  nerves  and  have  no  connection  with 
nerves."  He  found  that  sensation  and  movement  were 
stopped  and  even  the  voice  and  breathing  were  affected  by 
injuries  to  the  brain,  and  that  an  injury  to  one  side  of  the 
brain  affected  the  opposite  side  of  the  body.  His  public 
demonstration  by  dissection,  performed  in  the  presence  of 
various  philosophers  and  medical  men,  of  the  connection  be- 
tween the  brain  and  voice  and  respiration  and  the  commen- 
taries which  he  immediately  afterwards  dictated  on  this 
point  were  so  convincing,  he  tells  us  fifteen  years  later,  that 
no  one  has  ventured  openly  to  dispute  them."*  His  "experi- 
mental investigation  of  the  spinal  cord  by  sections  at  differ- 
ent levels  and  by  half  sections  was  still  more  remarkable."  ^ 
Galen  opposed  these  experimental  proofs  to  such  unscien- 
tific arguments  on  the  part  of  the  Stoic  philosopher,  Chry- 
sippus,  and  others,  as  that  the  heart  must  be  the  chief  organ 
because  it  is  in  the  center  of  the  body,  or  because  one   lays 

^Lancet   (1896),  p.  1139.  chick  led  Aristotle  to  locate  in  it 

*  I  have  failed  to  obtain  K.  F.  H.  the  central  seat  of  the  soul. 

Mark,  Herophilus,  ein  Beitrag  s:ur  ''  XIV,  626-30. 

Geschichtc    der    Medicin,    Carls-  "11,    683,    696,     This    and    the 

ruhe,  1838.  other     quotations     in     this     para- 

'D'Arcy  W.  Thompson   (1913),  graph  are  from  Dr.  Payne's  Har- 

22-23,  thinks  that  the  precedence  veian   Oration  as  printed   in   Tht 

of  the  heart  over  all  other  organs  Lancet  (1896),  pp.  1137-39- 
in  appearing  in  the  embryo  of  the 


IV  GALEN  147 

one's  hand  on  one's  heart  to  indicate  oneself,  or  because  the 
lips  are  moved  in  a  certain  way  in  saying  "I"( eyco).'^  Another 
noteworthy  experiment  by  Galen  was  that  in  which,  by 
binding  up  a  section  of  the  femoral  artery  he  proved  that 
the  arteries  contain  blood  and  not  air  or  spiritus  as  had 
been  generally  supposed.-  He  failed,  however,  to  perform 
any  experiments  with  the  pulmonary  veins,  and  so  the  no- 
tion persisted  that  these  conveyed  "spirit"  and  not  blood 
from  the  lungs  to  the  heart. ^ 

It  has  usually  been  stated  that  Galen  never  dissected  Did  Galen 

ever 
the  human  body  and  that  his  inferences  by  analogy  from   dissect 

his  dissection  of  animals  involved  him  in  serious  error  con-   ^  '?-^":> 

bodies? 

cerning  human  anatomy  and  physiology.  Certainly  he 
speaks  as  if  opportunities  to  secure  human  cadavers  or  even 
skeletons  were  rare.^  He  mentions,  however,  the  possibil- 
ity of  obtaining  the  bodies  of  criminals  condemned  to  death 
or  cast  to  beasts  in  the  arena,  or  the  corpses  of  robbers 
which  lie  unburied  in  the  mountains,  or  the  bodies  of  in- 
fants exposed  by  their  parents.^  It  is  not  sufficient,  he 
states  in  another  passage,^  to  read  books  about  human 
bones;  one  should  have  them  before  one's  eyes.  Alexan- 
dria is  the  best  place  for  the  student  to  go  to  see  actual  ex- 
hibitions of  this  sort  made  by  the  teachers."^  But  even  if 
one  cannot  go  there,  one  may  be  able  to  procure  human 
bones  for  oneself,  as  Galen  did  from  a  skeleton  which  had 

^Kiihn,  V,  216,  cited  by  Payne.  *II,    384-86. 

*Kiihn,   II,  642-49;   IV,   703-36,  e  tt 

"An    in    arteriis    natura    sanguis  ,  ^  u    1. 

contineatur."     J.  Kidd,  A  Cursory  ^Augustine  testifies  in  two  pas- 

Analysis  of  the   Works  of  Galen  sages    of    his    Dc    anima    et    eius 

so  far  as  they  relate  to  Anatomy  origine    (Migne   PL  44,  475-548), 

and   Physiology,    in    Transactions  that  vivisection  of  human  beings 

of    the    Provincial    Medical    and  was  practiced  as  late  as  his  time, 

Surgical  Association,  VI    (1837),  the    early    fifth    century:    IV,    3, 

299-336.  "Medici     tamen     qui     appellantur 

^Lancet    (1896),  p.    1137,  where  anatomici  per  membra  per  venas 

Payne    states    that    Colombo    {De  per  nervos  per  ossa  per  medullas 

re  anatomica,   Venet.    1559,   XIV,  per   interiora   vitalia   etiam   vivos 

261)  was  the  first  to  prove  by  ex-  homines     quamdiu     inter     manus 

periment  on  the  living  heart  that  rimantium    vivere    potuerunt    dis- 

these  veins  conveyed  blood   from  siciendo  scrutati  sunt  ut  naturam 

the  lungs.  corporis     nossent";     and     IV,     6 

*II,    146-47.  (Migne,   PL  44,   528-9). 


148  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 

been  washed  out  of  a  grave  by  a  flooded  stream  and  from 
the  corpse  of  a  robber  slain  in  the  mountains.     If  one  can- 
not get  to  see  a  human  skeleton  by  these  means  or  some 
other,  he  should  dissect  monkeys  and  apes. 
Dissection  Indeed  Galen  advises  the  student  to  dissect  apes  in  any 

case,  in  order  to  prepare  himself  for  intelligent  dissection 
of  the  human  body,  should  he  ever  have  the  opportunity. 
From  lack  of  such  previous  experience  the  doctors  with 
the  army  of  Marcus  Aurelius,  who  dissected  the  body  of  a 
dead  German,  learned  nothing  except  the  position  of  the 
entrails.  Galen  at  any  rate  dissected  a  great  many  animals. 
Tiny  animals  and  insects  he  let  alone,  for  the  microscope 
was  not  yet  discovered,  but  besides  apes  and  quadrupeds 
he  cut  up  many  reptiles,  mice,  weasels,  birds,  and  fish.^  He 
also  gives  an  amusing  account  of  the  medical  men  at  Rome 
gathering  to  observe  the  dissection  of  an  elephant  in  order 
to  discover  whether  the  heart  had  one  or  two  vertices  and 
two  or  three  ventricles.  Galen  assured  them  beforehand 
that  it  would  be  found  similar  to  the  heart  of  any  other 
breathing  animal.  This  particular  dissection  was  not,  how- 
ever, performed  exclusively  in  the  interests  of  science,  since 
it  was  scarcely  accomplished  when  the  heart  was  carried 
off,  not  to  a  scientific  museum,  but  by  the  imperial  cooks 
to  their  master's  table.^  Galen  sometimes  dissected  animals 
the  moment  he  killed  them.  Thus  he  observed  that  the 
lungs  always  sensibly  shrank  from  the  diaphragm  in  a 
dying  animal,  whether  he  killed  it  by  suffocation  in  water, 
or  strangling  with  a  noose,  or  severing  the  spinal  medulla 
near  the  first  vertebrae,  or  cutting  the  large  arteries  or 
veins. ^ 
Surgical  Surgical  operations  and  medical  practice  were  a  third 

operations,   ^ay  of  learning  the  human  anatomy,  and  Galen  complains 
of  the  carelessness  of  those  physicians  and  surgeons  who 
do  not  take  pains  to  observe  it  before  performing  an  oper- 
ation or  cure.     He  himself  had  had  one  case  where  the 
*  n,  537,  *  II,  619-20.  •  II,  701. 


IV  GALEN  149 

human  heart  was  laid  bare  and  yet  the  patient  recovered.^ 
As  a  young  practitioner  before  he  came  to  Rome  Galen 
worked  out  so  successful  a  method  of  treating  wounds  of 
the  sinews  that  the  care  of  the  health  of  the  gladiators  in 
his  native  city  of  Pergamum  was  entrusted  to  him  by  sev- 
eral successive  pontifices  -  and  he  hardly  lost  a  life.  In  the 
same  passage  he  again  speaks  contemptuously  of  the  doctors 
in  the  war  with  the  Germans  who  were  allowed  to  cut  open 
the  bodies  of  the  barbarians  but  learned  no  more  thereby 
than  a  cook  would.  When  Galen  came  from  Pergamum  to 
Rome  he  found  the  professions  of  physicians  and  surgeons 
distinct  and  left  cases  to  the  latter  which  he  before  had  at- 
tended to  himself.^  We  may  note  finally  that  he  invented 
a  new  form  of  surgical  knife.* 

In  Galen's  opinion  the  study  of  anatomy  was  important  Galen's 
for  the  philosopher  as  well  as  for  the  physician.  An  under-  froJJJ"^"* 
standing  of  the  use  of  the  parts  of  the  body  is  helpful  to  design, 
the  doctor,  he  says,  but  much  more  so  to  "the  philosopher 
of  medicine  who  strives  to  obtain  knowledge  of  all  nature."  ^ 
In  the  De  iisu  partium  ^  he  came  to  the  conclusion  that  in 
the  structure  of  any  animal  we  have  the  mark  of  a  wise 
workman  or  demiurge,  and  of  a  celestial  mind;  and  that 
"the  investigation  of  the  use  of  the  parts  of  the  body  lays 
the  foundation  of  a  truly  scientific  theology  which  is  much 
greater  and  more  precious  than  all  medicine,"  and  which 
reveals  the  divinity  more  clearly  than  even  the  Eleusinian 
mysteries  or  Samothracian  orgies.  Thus  Galen  adopts  the 
argument  from  design  for  the  existence  of  God.  The  mod- 
ern doctrine  of  evolution  is  of  course  subversive  of  his 
premise  that  the  parts  of  the  body  are  so  well  constructed 
for  and  marvelously  adapted  to  their  functions  that  nothing 
better  is  possible,  and  consequently  of  his  conclusion  that 
this  necessitates  a  divine  maker  and  planner. 

^IT,  631  ff.  cal  bearing. 

''XIII,     599-600.      Galen    states  '  X,  454-55. 

that      the      pontifex's      term      of  *  II,   682. 

office   was    seven    months,    a    fact  ^11,  291. 

which  perhaps  had  some  astrologi-  "  IV,   360,   et  passim. 


150 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Queries 
concerning 
the  soul. 


No  super- 
natural 
force  in 
medicine. 


In  the  treatise  De  foetuum  formatione  Galen  displays  a 
similar  inclination  but  more  tentatively  and  timidly.  He 
thinks  that  the  human  body  attests  the  wisdom  and  power 
of  its  maker/  whom  he  wishes  the  philosophers  would  re- 
veal to  him  more  clearly  and  tell  him  "whether  he  is  some 
wise  and  powerful  god."^  The  process  of  the  formation 
of  the  child  in  the  womb,  the  complex  human  muscular 
system,  the  human  tongue  alone,  seem  to  him  so  wonderful 
that  he  will  not  subscribe  to  the  Epicurean  denial  of  any 
all-ruling  providence.^  He  thinks  that  nature  alone  cannot 
show  such  wisdom.  He  has,  however,  sought  vainly  from 
philosopher  after  philosopher  for  a  satisfactory  demonstra- 
tion of  the  existence  of  God,  and  is  by  no  means  certain 
himself.* 

Galen  is  also  at  a  loss  concerning  the  existence  and  sub- 
stance of  the  soul.  He  points  out  that  puppies  try  to  bite 
before  their  teeth  come  and  that  calves  try  to  hook  before 
their  horns  grow,  as  if  the  soul  knew  the  use  of  these  parts 
beforehand.  It  might  be  argued  that  the  soul  itself  causes 
the  parts  to  grow,^  but  Galen  questions  this,  nor  is  he  ready 
to  accept  the  Platonic  world-soul  theory  of  a  divine  force 
permeating  all  nature.^  It  offends  his  instinctive  piety  and 
sense  of  fitness  to  think  of  the  world-soul  in  such  things 
as  reptiles,  vermin,  and  putrefying  corpses.  On  the  other 
hand,  he  disagrees  with  those  who  deny  any  innate  knowl- 
edge or  standards  to  the  soul  and  attribute  everything  to 
sense  perception  and  certain  imaginations  and  memories 
based  thereon.  Some  even  deny  the  existence  of  the  rea- 
soning faculty,  he  says,  and  affirm  that  we  are  led  by  the 
affections  of  the  senses  like  cattle.  For  these  men  courage, 
prudence,  temperance,  continence  are  mere  names. "^ 

In  commenting  upon  the  works  of  Hippocrates,  Galen 
insists  that  in  speaking  of  "something  divine"  in  diseases 

^  IV,  687.  soul     constructs     the     parts    and 

*  IV,  694,  696.  another  soul  incites  them  to  vol- 

*  IV,  688.  untary  motion. 
*IV,  700.  ejY    „j 

'  IV,  692 ;  II,  537.     Others  con-  " '  7"^' 

tend,  he  says  (IV,  693),  that  one  *II,  28. 


IV  GALEN  151 

Hippocrates  could  not  have  meant  supernatural  influence, 
which  he  never  admits  into  medicine  in  other  passages. 
Galen  tries  to  explain  away  the  expression  as  having  ref- 
erence to  the  effect  of  the  surrounding  air.^  Thus  while 
Galen  might  look  upon  nature  or  certain  things  in  nature 
as  a  divine  work,  he  would  not  admit  any  supernatural 
force  in  science  or  medicine,  or  anything  bordering  upon 
special  providence.  In  the  De  usu  partiiim  Galen  states 
that  he  agrees  with  Moses  that  "the  beginning  of  genesis  in 
all  things  generated"  was  "from  the  demiurge,"  but  that  he 
does  not  agree  with  him  that  anything  is  possible  with  God 
and  that  God  can  suddenly  turn  a  stone  into  a  man  or  make 
a  horse  or  cow  from  ashes.  "In  this  matter  our  opinion 
and  that  of  Plato  and  of  others  among  the  Greeks  who 
have  written  correctly  concerning  natural  science  differs 
from  the  view  of  Moses."  In  Galen's  view  God  attempts 
nothing  contrary  to  nature  but  of  all  possible  natural 
courses  invariably  chooses  the  best.  Thus  Galen  expresses 
his  admiration  at  nature's  providence  in  keeping  the  eye- 
brows and  eyelashes  of  the  same  length  and  not  letting 
them  grow  long  like  the  beard  or  hair,  but  this  is  because 
a  harder  cartilaginous  flesh  is  provided  for  them  to  grow 
in,  and  the  mere  will  of  God  would  not  keep  hairs  from 
growing  in  soft  flesh.  If  God  had  not  provided  the  carti- 
laginous substance  for  the  eyelashes,  "he  would  have  been 
more  careless,  not  merely  than  Moses  but  than  a  worthless 
general  who  builds  a  wall  in  a  swamp."  ^  As  between  the 
views  on  God  of  Moses  and  Epicurus,  Galen  prefers  to  steer 
a  middle  course. 

Already  in  describing  Galen's  dissections  and  tests  with  Galen's 
the  pulse  we  have  seen  evidence  of  the  accurate  observation  mental 
and  experimental  instincts  which  accompanied  his  zest  for  '"^t*"*^** 
hard  work  and  zeal  for  truth.     In  one  of  his  treatises  he 

*  XVIII  B,  I7ff.  Moses  Maimonides  in  the  twelfth 

^  De  usu  partium,  XI,  14  (Kiihn,  century    took    exception    at    some 

111,905-7).    The  passage  seems  to  length,    in   the   2Sth   Particula   of 

me  an  integral  part  of  the  work  his  Aphorisms  from  Galen,  to  this 

and     not     a     later     interpolation.  criticism  of  his  national  lawgiver. 


152 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


Attitude 
towards 
authori- 
ties. 


confesses  that  it  was  a  passion  of  his  always  to  test  every- 
thing for  himself.  "And  if  anyone  accuses  me  of  this,  I 
will  confess  my  disease,  from  which  I  have  suffered  all  my 
life  long,  that  I  have  trusted  no  one  of  those  who  narrate 
such  things  until  I  have  tested  it  myself,  if  it  was  possible 
for  me  to  have  experience  of  it,"  ^  Galen  also  recognized 
that  general  theories  were  not  sufficient  for  exact  knowledge 
and  that  specific  examples  seen  with  one's  own  eyes  were 
indispensable.^  He  maintains  that,  if  all  teachers  and 
writers  would  realize  and  observe  this,  they  would  make 
comparatively  few  false  statements.  He  saw  the  danger 
of  making  absolute  assertions  and  the  need  of  noting  the 
particular  circumstances  of  each  individual  case.^  Galen 
more  than  once  declared  that  things,  not  names,  were  im- 
portant and  refused  to  waste  time  in  disputing  about  termin- 
ology and  definitions  which  might  be  spent  in  "pursuing  the 
knowledge  of  things  themselves."  *  Thus  we  see  in  Galen 
a  pragmatic  scientist  intent  upon  concrete  facts  and  exact 
knowledge ;  but  at  the  same  time  it  must  be  recognized  that 
he  accepted  some  universal  theorems  and  general  views. 

Galen  did  not  believe  in  merely  repeating  in  new  books 
the  statements  of  previous  authorities.  Ever  since  boy- 
hood, he  writes  in  his  Anatomical  Administrations,  it  has 
seemed  to  him  that  one  should  record  in  writing  only  one's 
new  discoveries  and  not  repeat  what  has  been  said  already.^ 
Nevertheless  in  some  of  his  writings  he  collects  the  pre- 
scriptions of  past  physicians  at  great  length,  and  a  previous 
treatise  by  Archigenes  is  practically  embodied  in  one  of 
Galen's  works  on  compound  medicines.  On  another  occa- 
sion, however,  after  stating  that  Crito  had  combined  previ- 
ous treatises  upon  cosmetics,  including  the  work  of  Cleo- 
patra, into  four  books  of  his  own  which  constitute  a  well- 
nigh  exhaustive  treatment  of  the  subject,  Galen  says  that 


^IV,  513;  see  also  II,  55,  cos  ?7w7e  'XIII,  964. 

irpwrov  niv  &Kovaai  t6  yivonevov,  kdavfxaaa  ''II,    136;    X,   3^5  J    XII,   3II  >    he 

Kal  avrbs  e^ovXrjdijv  aiiTowTrjs  airov  Kara-  credited   Plato  with  the  same  atti- 

CT^j'tti.  tude,  see  II,  581. 

'X,  608;  XIII,  887-88.  MI,  659-60. 


IV 


GALEN  153 


he  sees  no  profit  in  copying  Crito's  work  again  and  merely 
reproduces  its  table  of  contents.^  On  the  other  hand,  as 
this  passage  shows,  Galen  thought  that  the  ancients  had 
stated  many  things  admirably  and  he  had  little  patience  with 
contemporaries  who  would  learn  nothing  from  them  but 
were  always  ambitiously  weaving  new  and  complicated  dog- 
mas, or  misinterpreting  and  perverting  the  teachings  of  the 
ancients.^  His  method  was  rather  first  to  "make  haste  and 
stretch  every  nerve  to  learn  what  the  most  celebrated  of 
the  ancients  have  said ;"  ^  then,  having  mastered  this  teach- 
ing, to  judge  it  and  put  it  to  the  test  for  a  long  time  and 
determine  by  observation  how  much  of  it  agrees  and  how 
much  disagrees  with  actual  phenomena,  and  then  embrace 
the  former  portion  and  reject  the  latter. 

This  critical  employment  of  past  authorities  is  frequently  Adverse 
illustrated  in  Galen's  works.  He  mentions  a  great  many  of  p^st 
names  of  past  physicians  and  writers,  thereby  shedding  some  writers, 
light  upon  the  history  of  Greek  medicine;  but  at  times 
he  criticizes  his  predecessors,  not  sparing  even  Empedocles 
and  Aristotle.  Although  he  cites  Aristotle  a  great  deal, 
he  declares  that  it  is  not  surprising  that  Aristotle  made 
many  errors  in  the  anatomy  of  animals,  since  he  thought 
that  the  heart  in  large  animals  had  a  third  ventricle.^  As 
we  have  already  seen  in  discussing  the  topic  of  weights  and 
measurements,  Galen  especially  objects  to  the  vagueness  and 
inaccuracy  of  many  past  medical  writers,^  or  praises  in- 
dividuals like  Heras  who  give  specific  information.^  He 
also  shows  a  preference  for  writers  who  give  first-hand 
information,  commending  Heraclides  of  Tarentum  as  a 
trustworthy  man,  if  there  ever  was  one,  who  set  down  only 
those  things  proved  by  his  own  experience.'^  Galen  declares 
that  one  could  spend  a  life-time  in  reading  the  books  that 
have  already  been  written  upon  medicinal  simples.  He 
urges  his  readers,  however,  to  abstain  from  Andreas  and 

'XII,  446.  'XIII,  891. 

"11,    141,    179.  6YTTT     Ain  IT 

"11,  179;  X,  609.  ^^^^'  430-31. 

*II,  621.  ^XIII,   717. 


IS4 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


Galen's 
estimate 
of  Dios- 
corides. 


Galen's 
dogma- 
tism : logic 
and  ex- 
perience. 


other  liars  of  that  stamp,  and  above  all  to  eschew  Pamphilus 
who  never  saw  even  in  a  dream  the  herbs  which  he  describes. 
Of  all  previous  writers  upon  materia  niedica  Galen  pre- 
ferred Dioscorides.  He  writes,  "But  Anazarbensis  Dios- 
corides  in  five  books  discussed  all  useful  material  not  only 
of  herbs  but  of  trees  and  fruits  and  juices  and  liquors,  treat- 
ing besides  both  all  metals  and  the  parts  of  animals."  ^  Yet 
he  does  not  hesitate  to  criticize  certain  statements  of  Dios- 
corides, such  as  the  story  of  mixing  goat's  blood  with  the 
terra  sigillata  of  Lemnos.  Dioscorides  had  also  attributed 
marvelous  virtues  to  the  stone  Gagates  which  he  said  came 
from  a  river  of  that  name  in  Lycia;  Galen's  comment  is 
that  he  has  skirted  the  entire  coast  of  Lycia  in  a  small  boat 
and  found  no  such  stream.^  He  also  wonders  that  Dios- 
corides described  butter  as  made  of  the  milk  of  sheep  and 
goats,  and  correctly  states  that  "this  drug"  is  made  from 
cows'  milk.^  Galen  does  not  mention  its  use  as  a  food  in 
his  work  on  medicinal  simples,  and  in  his  treatise  upon  food 
values  he  alludes  to  butter  rather  incidentally  in  the  chap- 
ter on  milk,  stating  that  it  is  a  fatty  substance  and  easily 
recognized  by  tasting  it,  that  it  has  many  of  the  properties 
of  oil,  and  in  cold  countries  is  sometimes  used  in  baths  in 
place  of  oil.^  Galen  further  criticizes  Dioscorides  for  his 
unfamiliarity  with  the  Greek  language  and  consequent  fail- 
ure to  grasp  the  significance  of  many  Greek  names. 

Daremberg  said  of  Galen  that  he  represented  at  the  same 
time  the  most  exaggerated  dogmatism  and  the  most  ad- 
vanced experimental  school.  There  is  some  justification 
for  the  paradox,  though  the  latter  part  seems  to  me  the 
truer.  But  Galen  was  proud  of  his  training  in  philosophy 
and  logic  and  mathematics;  he  stood  fast  by  many  Hippo- 
cratic  dogmas  such  as  the  four  qualities  theory,  he  thought  ^ 
that  in  medicine  as  in  geometry  there  were  a  certain  num- 
*XI,  794;  also  XIII,  658;  XIV,  "XII,  272. 


61-62,  and  many  other  passages  of 
the  Antidotes. 

*XII,  203.  Pliny,  NH  XXXVI, 
34,  makes  the  same  statement  as 
Dioscorides. 


*  Pliny,  NH  XXVIII,  35,  how- 
ever, both  tells  how  butter  is  made 
and  of  its  use  as  food  among  the 
barbarians. 

"^X,  40-41 


IV  GALEN  155 

ber  of  self-evident  maxims  upon  which  reason,  conforming 
to  the  rules  of  logic,  might  build  up  a  scientific  structure. 
In  the  De  methodo  medendi  ^  he  makes  a  distinction  be- 
tween the  discovery  of  drugs  and  medicines,  simple  or  com- 
pound, by  experience  and  the  methodical  treatment  of  dis- 
ease which  he  now  sets  forth  and  which  should  proceed  log- 
ically and  independently  of  mere  empiricism,  and  he  wishes 
that  other  medical  writers  would  make  it  clear  when  they 
are  relying  merely  on  experience  and  when  exclusively  upon 
reason.^  At  the  same  time  he  expresses  his  dislike  for  mere 
dogmatizers  who  shout  their  ipse  dixits  like  tyrants  with- 
out the  support  either  of  reason  or  experience.^  He  also 
grants  that  the  ordinary  man,  taught  by  nature  alone,  often 
instinctively  pursues  a  better  course  of  action  for  his  health 
than  "the  sophists"  are  able  to  advise.*  Indeed,  he  is  of  the 
opinion  that  some  doctors  would  do  well  to  stick  to  experi- 
ence alone  and  not  try  to  mix  in  reasoning,  since  they  are 
not  trained  in  logic,  and  when  they  endeavor  to  divide  or 
analyze  a  theme,  perform  like  unskilled  carvers  who  fail 
to  find  the  joints  and  mutilate  the  roast. ^  Later  on  in  the 
same  work  ^  he  again  affirms  that  persons  who  will  not  read 
and  profit  by  the  books  of  medical  authorities  and  whose 
own  reasoning  is  defective,  should  limit  themselves  to  ex- 
perience. 

Normally,  however,  Galen  upholds  both  reason  and  ex-   Galen's 
perience  as  criteria  of  truth  against  the  opposing  schools    account  of 
of  Dogmatics  and  Empirics.     The  former  attacked  experi-   pirics. 
ence  as  uncertain  and  impossible  to  regulate,  slow  and  un- 
methodical.    The  latter  replied  that  experience  was  con- 
sistent, adaptable  to  art,  and  proof  enough.'^     Galen's  chief 
objection  to  the  Empirics  is  that  they  reject  reason  as  a  cri- 
terion of  truth  and  wish  the  medical  art  to  be  irrational.^ 
"The  Empirics  say  that  all  things  are  discovered  by  experi- 

^X,  127,  962.  «X,  915-16. 

'X,  31.  'I,  75-76:  XIV,  367. 

\  X,  29.  » I,  145 ;  II.  41-43 ;  X,  30-31,  782- 

*X,   668.  83;  XIII,   188,  366,  375,  463,  579, 

X,  123.  594,  892 ;  XIV,  245,  679. 


156  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

ence,  but  we  say  that  some  are  found  by  experience  and 
some  by  reason."  ^  Galen  also  objects  to  Herodotus's  ex- 
planation of  the  medical  art  as  originating  in  the  conversa- 
tion of  patients  exposed  at  crossroads  who  told  one  another 
of  their  complaints  and  recoveries  and  thus  evolved  a  fund 
of  common  experience.^  Galen  criticizes  such  experience 
as  irrational  and  not  yet  put  into  scientific  form  (ov-koo  Xoyut?)  . 
Of  the  Empirics  he  tells  us  further  that  they  regard 
phenomena  only  and  ignore  causes  and  put  no  trust  in  rea- 
soning. They  hold  that  there  is  no  system  or  necessary 
order  in  medical  discovery  or  doctrine,  and  that  some  rem- 
edies have  been  discovered  by  dreams,  others  by  chance. 
They  also  accepted  written  accounts  of  past  experiences  and 
thus  to  a  certain  extent  trusted  in  tradition.  Galen  argues 
that  they  should  test  these  statements  of  past  authorities  by 
reason.^  His  further  contention  that,  if  they  test  them  by 
experience,  they  might  as  well  reject  all  writings  and  trust 
only  to  present  experience  from  the  start,  is  a  sophistical 
quibble  unworthy  of  him.  He  adds,  however,  that  the  Em- 
pirics themselves  say  that  past  tradition  or  "history" 
( taTOpla)  should  not  be  judged  by  experience,  but  it  is 
unlikely  that  he  represents  their  view  correctly  in  this  par- 
ticular. In  another  passage  ^  he  says  that  they  distinguish 
three  kinds  of  experience,  chance  or  accidental,  offhand  or 
impromptu,  and  imitative  or  the  repetition  of  the  same 
thing.  In  a  third  passage  ^  he  repeats  that  they  held  that 
observation  of  one  or  two  instances  was  not  enough,  but 
that  oft-repeated  observation  was  needed  with  all  conditions 
the  same  each  time.  In  yet  another  place  ®  he  says  that  the 
Empirics  observe  coincidences  in  things  joined  by  experi- 
ence. He  himself  defines  experience  as  the  comprehending 
and  remembering  of  something  seen  often  and  in  the  same 
condition,'^  and  makes  the  good  point  that  one  cannot  ob- 
serve satisfactorily  without  use  of  reason.^    He  also  admits 

^X,  159-  "I.  135. 

'  XIV,  675-76.  '  XIV,  680. 

*I,  T44-SS.  'I,  131. 

'XVI.  82.  'I,    134- 


IV  GALEN  157 

in  one  place  that  some  Empirics  are  ready  to  employ  reason 
as  well  as  experience.-^ 

Having  noted  Galen's  criticism  of  the  Empirics,  we  may  How  the 
imagine  what  their  attitude  would  be  towards  his  medicine,  ^i^h*"^^ 
They  would  probably  reject  all  his  theories — which  we,  too,   have 

criticized 

have  finally  discarded — of  four  elements  and  four  qualities  Galen, 
and  the  like,  and  would  accept  only  his  specific  recommenda- 
tions for  the  cure  of  disease  based  upon  his  medical  experi- 
ence; except  that  they  would  also  be  credulous  concerning 
anything  which  he  assured  them  was  based  upon  his  own 
or  another's  experience,  whether  it  truly  was  or  not.  They 
would,  however,  have  probably  questioned  much  of  his 
anatomical  inference  from  the  dissection  of  the  lower  ani- 
mals, since  he  tells  us  that  they  "have  written  whole  books 
against  anatomy."  ^  Considering  the  state  of  knowledge  in 
their  time,  their  refusal  to  attempt  any  large  generalizations 
or  to  hazard  any  scientific  hypotheses  or  to  build  any  risky 
medical  system  was  in  a  way  commendable,  but  their  cre- 
dulity as  to  particulars  was  a  weakness. 

On  the  whole  Galen's  attitude  towards  experience  seems  Galen's 
an  improvement  upon  theirs.    He  was  apparently  more  criti-  of  "eason 

cal  towards   the   "experiences"   of   past   writers   than  the  and  ex- 

perience. 
average  Empiric,  and  in  his  combination  of  reason  and  ex- 
perience he  came  a  little  nearer  to  modern  experimental 
method.  Reason  alone,  he  says,  discovers  some  things, 
experience  alone  discovers  some,  but  to  find  others  requires 
use  of  both  experience  and  reason.^  In  his  treatise  upon 
critical  days  he  keeps  reiterating  that  their  existence  is  proved 
both  by  reason  and  experience.  These  two  instruments 
in  judging  things  given  us  by  nature  supplement  each  other.* 
"Logical  methods  have  force  in  finding  what  is  sought,  but 
in  believing  what  has  been  well  found  there  are  two  criteria 
for  all  men,  reason  and  experience."  ^  "What  can  you  do 
with  men  who  cannot  be  persuaded  either  by  reason  or  by 

'XVI,  82.  *XIII,  1 16-17. 

^11,  288. 

"  IX,  842 ;  XIII,  887.  "  X,  28-29. 


158 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Simples 
knowable 
only  from 
experi- 
ence. 


practice  ?"  ^  Galen  also  speaks  of  discovering  a  truth  by 
logic  and  being  thereby  encouraged  to  try  it  in  practice  and 
of  then  verifying  it  by  experience.^  This,  however,  is  not 
quite  the  same  thing  as  saying  that  the  scientist  should  aim 
to  discover  new  truth  by  purposive  experiments,  or  that 
from  a  number  of  experiences  reason  may  infer  some  gen- 
eral law  of  nature. 

It  is  perhaps  in  his  work  on  medicinal  simples  that  Galen 
lays  most  stress  upon  the  importance  of  experience.  In- 
deed he  sees  no  other  way  to  learn  the  properties  of  natural 
objects  than  through  the  experience  of  the  senses.^  *'For 
by  the  gods,"  he  exclaims,  "how  is  it  that  we  know  that  fire 
is  hot?  Are  we  taught  it  by  some  syllogism  or  persuaded 
of  it  by  some  demonstration?  And  how  do  we  learn  that 
ice  is  cold  except  from  the  senses  ?"  *  And  Galen  sees  no 
advantage  in  spending  further  time  in  arguments  and  hair- 
splitting where  one  can  learn  the  truth  at  once  from  the 
senses.  This  thought  he  keeps  repeating  through  the  trea- 
tise, saying,  for  example,  "The  surest  judge  of  all  will  be 
experience  alone,  and  those  who  abandon  it  and  reason  on 
any  other  basis  not  only  are  deceived  but  destroy  the  value 
of  the  treatise."  ^  Moreover,  he  restricts  his  account  of  me- 
dicinal simples  to  those  with  which  he  is  personally  ac- 
quainted. In  the  three  books  treating  of  plants  he  does  not 
mention  all  those  found  in  all  parts  of  the  world,  but  only  as 
many  as  it  has  been  his  privilege  to  know  by  experience.*  He 
proposes  to  follow  the  same  rule  in  the  ensuing  discussion  of 
animals  and  to  say  nothing  of  virtues  which  he  has  not  tested 
or  of  substances  mentioned  in  the  writings  of  past  physi- 
cians but  unknown  to  him.  He  dares  not  trust  their  state- 
ments when  he  reflects  how  some  have  lied  in  such  matters. 
In  the  middle  ages  Albertus  Magnus  talks  in  much  the  same 
strain  in  his  works  on  animals,  plants,  and  minerals,  and 
perhaps  he  was  stimulated  to  such  ideals,  consciously  or  un- 


^X,  684. 

'X,  454-55. 
•XI,  420. 


'XI,  434-35. 

'XI,  456. 

XII,  246. 


IV  GALEN  1 59 

consciously,  directly  by  reading  Galen  or  indirectly  through 
Arabic  works,  by  Galen's  earlier  expression  of  them. 
Galen  mentions  some  virtues  ascribed  to  substances  which 
he  has  tested  by  experience  and  found  false,  such  as  the 
medicinal  properties  attributed  to  the  belly  of  a  seagulP  and 
some  of  those  claimed  for  the  marine  animal  called  torpedo.^ 
Anointing  the  place  with  frog's  blood  or  dog's  milk  will  not 
prevent  eyebrows  that  have  been  plucked  out  from  grow- 
ing again,  nor  will  bat's  blood  and  viper's  fat  remove  hair 
from  the  arm-pits.^  Also  the  brain  of  a  hare  is  only  fairly 
good  for  boys'  teeth.* 

In  beginning  his  work  on  food  values  ^  Galen  states  that  Experi- 

cncG  3.11(1 

many  have  discussed  the  properties  of  aliments,  some  on  the  food 
basis  of  reason  alone,  some  on  the  basis  of  experience  alone,  science, 
but  that  their  statements  do  not  agree.  On  the  whole,  since 
reasoning  is  not  easy  for  everyone,  requiring  natural  sagac- 
ity and  training  from  childhood,  he  thinks  it  better  to  start 
from  experience,  especially  since  not  a  few  physicians  are 
of  the  opinion  that  only  thus  can  the  properties  of  foods 
be  learned. 

The  Empirics  contended  that  most  compound  medicines  Experi- 
had  been  hit  upon  by  chance,  and  Galen  grants  that  the   com- 
Dogmatics  usually  are  unable  to  give  reasons  for  the  in-  Po^-"<^s. 
gredients  of  their  doses  and  find  difficulty  in  reproducing  a 
lost  prescription.^     But  he  holds  that  reasons  can  be  given 
for  the  constituents  of  the  compound  and  that  the  logical 
discovery  of  such  remedies  differs  from  the  empirical.'^    His 
own  method  was  to  learn  the  nature  of  each  disease  and  the 
varied  properties  of  simples,  and  then  prepare  a  compound 
suited  to  the  disease  and  to  the  patient.^    On  the  other  hand, 
we  see  how  much  depends  upon  experience  from  his  con- 
fession that  sometimes  he  has  hastily  prepared  a  compound 
from  a  few  simples,  sometimes  from  more,  sometimes  from 
a  great  variety.     If  the  compound  worked  well,  he  would 

'XII,  336.  "VI,  453-55. 

•XII,  365.  "XIII,  463. 

•XII,  258,  262,  269,  331.  ■'XII,  895. 

*  XII,  334.  '  XIV,  222. 


i6o 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Sugges- 
tions of 
experi- 
mental 
method 


continue  to  use  it,  sometimes  making  it  stronger  and  some- 
times weaker,^  For  as  you  cannot  put  together  compounds 
without  rational  method,  so  you  cannot  tell  their  strength 
certainly  and  accurately  without  experience.^  He  admits 
that  no  one  can  tell  the  exact  quantity  of  each  ingredient  to 
employ  without  the  aid  of  experience,^  and  says,  "The 
proper  proportions  in  the  mixture  we  shall  find  conjectur- 
ally  before  experience,  scientifically  after  experience."  ^  In 
these  treatises  upon  compound  medicines,  unlike  that  on 
medicinal  simples,  Galen  gives  the  prescriptions  of  former 
physicians  as  well  as  some  tested  by  his  own  experience.*^ 
Sometimes,  however,  he  expresses  a  preference  for  the  med- 
icines of  those  writers  who  were  "most  experienced" ;  and 
once  says  that  he  will  give  some  compounds  of  the  more 
recent  writers,  who  in  their  turn  had  selected  the  best  from 
older  writers  of  long  experience  and  added  later  discoveries.® 
We  suspect,  however,  that  some  of  these  prescriptions  had 
not  been  tested  for  centuries. 

Galen  gives  a  few  directions  how  to  regulate  medical 
observation  and  experience,  although  they  cannot  be  said  to 
carry  us  very  far  on  the  road  to  modern  laboratory  research. 
He  saw  the  value  of  "long  experience,"  a  phrase  which  he 
often  employs.'^  He  states  that  one  experience  is  enough  to 
learn  how  to  prepare  a  drug,  but  to  learn  to  know  the  best 
medicines  in  each  kind  and  in  different  places  many  experi- 
ences are  required.^  Medicinal  simples  should  be  frequently 
inspected,  "since  the  knowledge  of  things  perceived  by  the 
senses  is  strengthened  by  careful  examination."  ®  Galen  ad- 
vises the  student  of  medicine  to  study  herbs,  trees,  and  fruit 
as  they  grow,  to  find  out  when  it  is  best  to  pluck  them,  how 
to  preserve  them,  and  so  on.  But  elsewhere  he  states  that 
it  is  possible  to  estimate  the  general  virtue  of  the  simple 


*XIII,  700-701. 
*XIII,  706-707. 
"Xlll,  467. 

*XIII,  867. 

'XII,  392-93,  884;  XIII,  116-17, 
123,  125,  128-29,  354,  485,  502-503, 


582,  656. 

"XII,  968,  988. 

'See    XII,    988 
XIV,  12,  60,  341. 

«XIV,  82. 

•XIII,  S70. 


XIII,   960-61; 


IV  GALEN  i6i 

from  one  or  two  experiences.-^  However,  he  suggests  that 
their  effect  be  noted  in  the  three  cases  of  a  perfectly  heahhy 
person,  a  sHghtly  aihng  patient,  and  a  really  sick  man.^  In 
the  last  case  one  should  further  note  their  varying  effects  as 
the  disease  is  marked  by  any  excess  of  heat,  cold,  dryness, 
or  m.oisture.  Care  should  be  taken  that  the  simples  them- 
selves are  pure  and  free  from  any  admixture  of  a  foreign 
substance.^  "It  is  also  essential  to  test  the  relation  to  the 
nature  of  the  patient  of  all  those  things  of  which  great  use 
is  made  in  the  medical  art."  ^  One  condition  to  be  observed 
in  experimental  investigation  of  critical  days  is  to  count  no 
cases  where  any  slip  has  been  made  by  physician  or  patient 
or  bystanders  or  where  any  other  foreign  factor  has  done 
harm.^  Galen  was  acquainted  with  physical  experiments  in 
siphoning,  for  he  says  that,  if  one  withdraws  the  air  from 
a  vessel  containing  sand  and  water,  the  sand  will  follow  be- 
fore the  water,  which  is  the  heavier  {sic?).^ 

Galen  also  points  out  some  of  the  difficulties  of  medi-   Difficulty 
cal  experimentation.     One  is  the  extreme  unlikelihood  of  experi-*'^^ 
ever  being  able  to  observe  in  even  two  cases  the  same  com-   ment. 
bination  of  symptoms  and  circumstances.'^     The  other  is 
the  danger  to  the  life  of  the  patient  from  rash  experiment- 
ing.^    Thus  Galen  more  than  once  tells  us  of  abstaining 
from  testing  some  remedy  because  he  had  others  of  whose 
effects  he  was  surer. 

In  the  treatise  on  easily  procurable  remedies  ascribed    Empirical 
to  Galen,^  in  which  we  have  already  seen  evidence  of  later 
interpolation  or  authorship,  some  recipes  are  concluded  by 

^XII,   350.  book,  O  Glaucon,  ends  thus.    If  it 

*XVI,  86-87;  XI,  518.  has  been  useful  to  you,  you  will 

*  XI,  485.  readily  follow  what  I've  written 
*XVI,  85.  to  Salomon  the  archiater."  But 
*IX,  842.  then  the  present  second  book 
*II,  206.  opens  with  the  words  (XIV,  390), 
'  I,    138.  "Since  you've  asked  me  to  write 

*  XVI,    80.  you  about  easily  procurable  reme- 

*  There  would  seem  to  be  some-  dies,  O  dearest  Solon,"  and  goes 
thing  wrong,  at  least  with  its  ar-  on  to  say  that  the  author  will  state 
rangement  as  it  now  stands,  for  what  he  has  learned  from  experi- 
the  first  book  ends  (XIV,  389)  ence  beginning  with  the  hair  and 
with  the  words,  "This  my  fourth  closing  with  the  feet. 


remedies. 


1 62 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Galen's 
influence 
upon 
medieval 
experi- 
ment. 


such  expressions  as,  "This  has  been  experienced;  it  works 
unceasingly,"  ^  or  "Another  remedy  tested  by  us  in  many 
cases."  ^  This  became  a  custom  in  many  subsequent  medi- 
cal works,  including  those  of  the  middle  ages.  One  recipe 
is  introduced  by  the  caution,  "But  don't  cure  anybody  un- 
less you  have  been  paid  first,  for  this  has  been  tested  in 
many  cases."  ^  But  we  are  left  in  some  doubt  whether  we 
should  infer  that  remedies  tested  by  experience  are  so  su- 
perior that  they  call  for  cash  payment  rather  than  credit,  or 
so  uncertain  that  it  is  advisable  that  the  physician  secure  his 
fee  before  the  outcome  is  known.  In  the  middle  ages  the 
word  experimentiim  was  used  a  great  deal  as  a  synonym  for 
any  medical  treatment,  recipe,  or  prescription.  Galen  ap- 
proaches this  usage,  which  we  have  already  noticed  in  Pliny's 
Natural  History,  when  he  describes  "a  very  important  ex- 
periment" in  bleeding  performed  by  certain  doctors  at 
Rome.* 

Indeed  Galen  appears  to  have  exerted  a  great  influence 
in  the  middle  ages  by  his  passages  concerning  experience  in 
particular  as  well  as  by  his  medicine  in  general.  Medieval 
writers  cite  him  as  an  authority  for  the  recognition  of  ex- 
perience and  reason  as  criteria  of  truth.^  Gilbert  of  Eng- 
land cites  "experiences  from  the  book  of  experiments  ex- 
perienced by  Galen,"  ^  and  we  shall  find  more  than  one  such 
apocryphal  work  ascribed  to  Galen  in  the  middle  ages. 
John  of  St.  Amand  seems  to  have  developed  seven  rules  '^ 
which  he  gives  for  discovering  experimentally  the  prop- 
erties of  medicinal  simples  from  what  we  have  heard  Galen 
say  on  the  subject,  and  in  another  work,  the  Concordances, 
John  collects  a  number  of  passages  about  experience  from 


^  XIV,  378. 

'XIV,  462. 

'XIV,  534. 

^XI,  205. 

°John  of  St.  Amand,  Expositio 
in  Antidotarium  Nicolai,  fol.  231, 
in  Mesuae  niedici  clarissimi  opera, 
Venice,  1568.  Pietro  d'Abano, 
Conciliator,  Venice,  1526,  Difif.  X, 
fol.  15;  Difif.  LX,  fol.  83.    Arnald 


of  Villanova,  Repetitio  super 
Canon  "Vita  brevis,"  fol.  276,  in 
his  Opera,  Lyons,  1532. 

"  Gilbertus  Anglicus,  Compen^ 
dium  mcdicinae,  Lyons,  15 10,  fol. 
328V.,  "Experimenta  ex  libro  ex- 
perimentorum  Gal.  experta." 

'  In  his  Expositio  in  Antido- 
tarium Nicolai,  as  cited  above 
(note  5). 


IV  GALEN  163 

the  works  o£  Galen. ^  Peter  of  Spain,  who  died  as  Pope 
John  XXI  in  1277,  cites  Galen  in  his  discussion  of  "the 
way  of  experience"  and  "the  way  of  reason"  in  his  Com- 
mentaries on  Isaac  on  Diets. ^  We  have  already  suggested 
Galen's  possible  influence  upon  Albertus  Magnus,  and  we 
might  add  Roger  Bacon  who  wrote  some  treatises  on  medi- 
cine. But  it  is  hardly  possible  to  tell  whether  such  ideas 
were  in  the  air,  or  were  due  to  Galen  individually  either  in 
their  origin  or  their  transmission.  But  he  made  a  rather 
close  approach  to  the  medieval  attitude  in  his  equal  regard 
for  logic  and  for  experimentation. 

The  more  general  influence  of  Galen  upon  all  sides  of  His  more 
the  medicine  of  the  following  fifteen  centuries  has  often  medieval 
been  stated  in  sweeping  terms,  but  is  difficult  to  exaggerate,  influence. 
His  general  theories,  his  particular  cures,  his  occasional  mar- 
velous stories,  were  often  repeated  or  paraphrased.  Ori- 
basius  has  been  called  "the  ape  of  Galen,"  and  we  shall  see 
that  the  epithet  might  with  equal  reason  be  applied  to  Aetius 
of  Amida.  Indeed,  as  in  the  case  of  Pliny,  we  shall  find 
plenty  of  instances  of  Galen's  influence  in  our  later  chap- 
ters. Perhaps  as  good  a  single  instance  of  medieval  study 
of  Galen  as  could  be  given  is  from  the  Concordances  of  John 
of  St.  Amand  already  mentioned,  which  bear  the  alterna- 
tive title,  "Recalled  to  Mind"  {Revocativum  memoriae), 
since  they  were  written  to  "relieve  from  toil  and  worry 
scholars  who  often  spend  sleepless  nights  in  searching  for 
points  in  the  books  of  Galen."  ^  Or  we  may  note  how  the 
associates  of  the  twelfth  century  translator  from  the  Arabic, 
Gerard  of  Cremona,  added  a  list  of  his  works  at  the  close 
of  his  translation  of  Galen's  Tegni,  "imitating  Galen  in 
the  commemoration  of  his  books  at  the  end  of  the  same  trea- 
tise," as  they  themselves  state.* 

Not  that  medieval  men  did  not  make  additions  of  their 

^J.  L.  Pagel,  Die  Concordanciae  XXI,  263-65). 

dcs  Johannes  de  Sancto  Amando,  ^  ed.   Lyons,   1515,   fols.    19V-20V. 

Berlin,    1894,    pp.     102-104.      John  'Berlin,   902,    I4tli    century,    fol. 

also  wrote  commentaries  on  Galen,  175;  Berlin  903,  1342  /  .D.,  fol.  2. 

(Histoire  Litteraire  de  la  France,  *  Boncompagni    (1851),   pp.   3-4. 


164 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


own  to  Galen.  For  instance,  the  noted  Jewish  philosopher, 
Moses  Maimonides,  in  adding  his  collection  of  medical 
Aphorisms  to  the  many  previous  compilations  of  this  sort 
by  Hippocrates,  Rasis  (Muhammad  ibn  Zakariya),  Mesne 
(Yuhanna  ibn  Masawaih),  and  others,  states  that  he  has 
drawn  them  mainly  from  the  works  of  Galen,  but  that  he 
supplements  these  with  some  in  his  own  name  and  some  by 
other  "moderns."^  Not  that  Galen  was  not  sometimes  criti- 
cized or  questioned.  A  later  Greek  writer,  Symeon  Seth, 
ventured  to  devote  a  special  treatise  to  a  refutation  of  some 
of  Galen's  physiological  views.  In  it,  addressing  himself 
to  those  "persons  who  regard  you,  O  Galen,  as  a  god,"  he 
endeavored  to  make  them  realize  that  no  human  being  is 
infalHble.^  Among  the  medical  treatises  of  Gentile  da  Fo- 
ligno,  who  was  papal  physician  and  performed  a  public  dis- 
section at  Padua  in  1341,^  is  found  a  brief  argument  against 
Galen's  fifth  aphorism.*     But  such  criticism  or  opposition 


^  Moses  ben  Maimon,  Apho- 
risms, 1489.  "Incipiunt  aphorismi 
excellentissimi  Raby  Moyses  se- 
cundum doctrinam  Galieni  medi- 
corum  principis  .  .  .  coUegi  eos 
ex  verbis  Galieni  de  omnibus 
libris  suis.  .  .  .  Et  ego  protuli 
super  his  aflforismis  quedam  dicta 
que  circumspexi  et  ea  m.eo  nomine 
nominavi  et  similiter  protuli  ali- 
quos  aphorismos  aliquorum  mod- 
ernorum  quos  denominavi  eorum 
nomine." 

*  Ed.  C.  V.  Daremberg,  Notices 
et  Extraits  dcs  manuscrits  mcdi- 
caux,  1853,  pp.  44-47,  Greek  text; 
pp.  229-33,  French  translation. 

*  Garrison,  History  of  Medicine, 
2nd  edition,  1917,  p.  141.  But  at  p. 
151  Garrison  would  seem  mistaken 
in  stating  that  Gentile  died  in 
1348,  for  in  the  MS  of  which  I 
shall  speak  in  the  next  footnote 
his  treatise  on  critical  days  is 
dated  back  in  the  year  1362: 
"Tractatus  de  enumeratione  die- 
rum  creticorum  m'i  Gentilis  anni 
1362,"  at  f ol.  125 ;  while  at  fol.  162 
we  read,  "Explicit  questio  .  .  . 
m'i  Zentilis  anno  Domini  1359  de 


mense  marcii,  et  scripta  Pisis  de 
mense  octobris  1359."  It  is  pos- 
sible but  rather  unlikely  that  the 
dates  later  than  1348  refer  to  the 
labors  of  copyists.  Venetian  MSS 
contain  not  only  a  De  reductione 
medicinarum  isd  actum  by  Gen- 
tile, written  at  Perugia  in  April, 
1342  (S.  Marco,  XIV,  7,  14th  cen- 
tury, fols.  44-48)  ;  but  also  "Sug- 
gestions concerning  the  pestilence 
which  was  at  Genoa  in  1348,"  by 
him  (S.  Marco,  XIV,  26,  15th 
century,  fols.  99-iGO,  consilia  de 
peste  quae  fuit  lanuae  anno  1348). 
Valentinelli's  catalogue  of  the 
MSS  in  the  Library  of  St.  Mark's 
does  not  help,  however,  to  clear 
up  the  question  when  Gentile  died, 
since  in  one  place  (IV,  235)  Va- 
lentinelli  assures  us  that  he  died 
at  Bologna  in  13 10,  and  in  another 
place  (V,  19)  says  that  he  died  at 
Perugia  in  1348. 

*  Cortona  no,  early  years  of 
15th  century,  fol.  128,  Rationes 
Gentilis  contra  Galenum  in  quinto 
aphorismi.  This  MS  contains  sev- 
eral other  works  by  Gentile  da 
Foligno. 


IV 


GALEN  i6s 


only  shows  how  generally  Galen  was  accepted  as  an  author- 
ity. 

III.     His  Attitude  Towards  Magic 

From  Galen's  habits  of  critical  estimation  rather  than 
blind  acceptation  of  authority,  of  scientific  observation,  care- 
ful measurement,  and  personal  experiment,  from  his  bril- 
liant demonstrations  by  dissection,  and  his  medical  prognos- 
tication and  therapeutics,  sane  and  shrewd  for  his  time, — 
from  these  we  have  now  to  turn  to  the  other  side  of  the  pic- 
ture, and  examine  what  information  his  works  afford  us 
concerning  the  magic  and  astrology  in  ancient  medicine,  con- 
cerning the  belief  in  occult  virtues,  suspensions,  characters, 
incantations,  and  the  like.  We  may  first  consider  what  he 
has  to  say  concerning  magic  and  divination  as  he  under- 
stands those  words,  and  then  take  up  his  attitude  to  those 
other  matters  which  we  look  upon  as  almost  equally  deserv- 
ing classification  under  those  heads. 

Apollonius  of  Tyana  and  Apuleius  of  Madaura  were  Accusa- 
not  the  only  celebrated  men  of  learning  in  the  early  Roman  ^°"^ic° 
Empire  to  be  accused  of  magic ;  we  have  already  alluded  to  against 
the  charges  of  magic  made  against  Galen  by  the  envious 
physicians  of  Rome  during  his  first  residence  in  that  city. 
It  is  hard  to  escape  the  conviction  that  at  that  time  learned 
men  were  very  liable  to  be  suspected  or  accused  of  magic. 
Indeed,  Galen  makes  the  general  assertion  that  when  a  phy- 
sician prognosticates  aright  concerning  the  future  course  of 
a  malady,  this  seems  so  marvelous  to  most  men  that  they 
would  receive  him  with  great  affection,  if  they  did  not  often 
regard  him  as  a  wizard.^  Soon  after  saying  this,  Galen 
begins  the  story  of  the  prognostications  he  made  and  the 
cure  he  wrought,  when  all  the  other  doctors  took  an  oppo- 
site view  of  the  case.-  One  of  them  then  jealously  sug- 
gested that  Galen's  diagnosis  was  due  to  divination.^  When 
asked  by  what  kind  of  divination,  he  gave  different  answers 

*XIV,  6oi.  »XIV,  605.  «XIV,  615. 


i66  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

at  different  times  and  to  different  persons,  sometimes  say- 
ing by  dreams,  sometimes  by  sacrificing,  again  by  symbols, 
or  by  astrology.  Afterwards  such  charges  against  Galen 
kept  multiplying.^  As  a  result,  Galen  says  that  since  then 
he  has  not  gone  about  advertising  his  prognostications  like 
a  herald,  lest  the  physicians  and  philosophers  hate  him  the 
more  and  slander  him  as  a  wizard  and  diviner,  but  that  he 
now  reveals  his  discoveries  only  to  his  friends.^  In  another 
treatise  he  represents  Hippocrates  as  saying  that  a  proficient 
doctor  should  be  able  to  prognosticate  the  course  of  diseases, 
but  adds  that  contemporary  physicians  call  such  a  doctor 
a  sorcerer  and  wonder-worker  (7077x0  re  /cat  ■Kapa.ho^dKoyov') .^ 
Again  in  his  work  on  medicinal  simples  ^  he  states  that  he 
abstained  from  testing  the  supposed  virtue  of  crocodile's 
blood  in  sharpening  the  vision,  and  the  blood  of  house  mice 
in  removing  warts,  partly  because  he  had  other  reliable  eye- 
medicines  and  cures  for  warts — such  as  myrmecia,  a  gem 
with  wart-like  lumps,  partly  because  by  employing  such  sub- 
stances he  feared  to  incur  the  reputation  of  a  sorcerer,  since 
jealous  physicians  were  already  slandering  his  medical  prog- 
nostications as  divination.  This  last  passage  affords  a  good 
illustration  of  the  close  connection  with  magic  of  certain 
natural  substances  supposed  to  possess  marvelous  virtues, 
while  Galen's  wart  stone  also  seems  magical  to  the  modern 
reader. 

Galen  himself  sometimes  calls  other  physicians  magicians. 
Certain  men  with  whom  he  does  not  agree  are  called  by  him 
"liars  or  wizards  or  I  don't  know  what  to  say,"  ^  and  an- 
other man  who  used  mouse  dung  to  excess  he  calls  super- 
stitious and  a  sorcerer.^  In  the  same  work  on  simples  '^  he 
says  that  he  will  list  herbs  in  alphabetical  order  as  Pamphilus 
did,  but  that  he  will  not  like  him  descend  to  old  wives'  tales, 
Egyptian  sorceries  and  incantations,  amulets  and  other  mag- 
ical devices,  which  not  only  do  not  belong  in  the  medical  art 

'XIV,  625.  «XII,  306. 

'XIV,  655.  .XII    ,07 

'1, 54-55.  '  ^  ^• 

'•XII,  263.  'XI,  792-93 


IV  GALEN  167 

but  are  utterly  false.  Pamphilus  never  saw  most  of  the 
herbs  he  mentioned,  much  less  tested  their  virtues,  but 
copied  anything  he  found,  piling  up  names,  incantations,  and 
wizardry.  Galen  accuses  Xenocrates  Aphrodisiensis  also 
of  not  having  eschewed  sorcery,  and  he  notes  that  medical 
writers  have  either  said  nothing  about  sweat  or  what  is 
superstitious  and  bordering  upon  magic.-^ 

Philters,  love-charms,  dream-draughts,  and  imprecations   Charms 
Galen  regards  as  impossible  or  injurious,  and  intends  to  ^"^  , 
have  nothing  to  do  with  them.     He  thinks  it  ridiculous  to  workers. 
believe  that  by  such  spells  one  can  bewitch  one's  adversaries 
so  that  they  cannot  plead  in  court,  or  conceive  or  bear  chil- 
dren.    He  considers  it  worse  to  advertise  and  perpetuate 
such  false  or  criminal  notions  in  writings  than  to  practice 
such  a  crime  but  once.-     In  one  passage,^  however,  to  illus- 
trate his  theory  that  the  gods  prepare  the  sperms  of  plants 
and  animals,  and  set  them  going  as  it  were,  and  afterwards 
leave  them  to  themselves,  Galen  compares  them  to  the  won- 
der-workers— who   were  perhaps  not   magicians   but  men 
similar  to  our  sidewalk  fakirs  who  exhibit  mechanical  toys— 
who  start  things  moving  and  then  go  away  themselves  while 
what  they  have  prepared  moves  on  artificially  for  a  time. 

Galen's  own  works  are  not  entirely  free  from  the  magi-   Animal 
cal  devices  of  which  he  accuses  others.    We  may  begin  with  fnadmiV^^ 
animal  substances,  since  he  himself  has  testified  that  the   sible  in 
use  of  sweat,  crocodile's  blood,  and  mouse's  dung  is  sug- 
gestive of  magic.     Moreover,  he  attributes  more  bizarre 
virtues  to  the  parts  of  animals  than  to  herbs  or  stones.     In 
a  passage  somewhat  similar  to  that  in  which  Pliny  *  ex- 
pressed his  horror  at  the  use  of  human  blood,  entrails,  and 
skulls  as  medicines,  Galen  declares  that  he  will  not  men- 
tion the  abominable  and  detestable,  as  Xenocrates  and  some 
others  have  done.    The  Roman  law  has  long  forbidden  eat- 
ing human  flesh,  while  Galen  regards  even  the  mention  of 
certain  secretions  and  excrements  of  the  human  body  as 

'XII,  283.  "IV,  688. 

"XII,   251-53.  '^Natural   Historv.    XXVIII.   2. 


i68 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Nastiness 
of  ancient 
medicine. 


Parts  of 
animals. 


offensive  to  modest  ears.^  Nevertheless,  before  long  he  of- 
fends against  his  own  standard  and  describes  how  he  ad- 
ministered to  patients  the  very  substance  which  he  had  be- 
fore characterized  as  most  unmentionable.^  It  may  also  be 
noted  that  he  repeats  unquestioningly  such  a  tale  as  that  the 
cubs  of  the  bear  are  born  unformed  and  licked  into  shape 
by  their  mother,^ 

Further  milder  illustrations  of  the  fact  that  such  nasty 
substances  were  then  not  merely  recommended  in  books  but 
freely  employed  in  actual  medical  practice,  are  seen  in  the 
frequent  use  by  one  of  Galen's  teachers  of  the  dung  of  dogs 
who  for  two  days  before  had  eaten  nothing  but  bones,*  in 
Galen's  own  wonderfully  successful  treatment  of  a  tumor 
on  a  rustic's  knee  with  goat  dung — which  is,  however,  too 
sharp  for  the  skins  of  children  or  city  ladies,^  and  in  his  dis- 
covery by  repeated  experience  that  the  dung  of  doves  who 
take  little  exercise  is  less  potent  than  that  of  those  who  take 
much,^  Galen  also  says  that  he  has  known  of  doctors  who 
have  cured  many  persons  by  giving  them  burnt  human  bones 
in  drink  without  their  knowledge.''' 

Galen's  medicinal  simples  include  the  bile  of  bulls,  hye- 
nas, cocks,  partridges,  and  other  animals.^  A  digestive  oil 
can  be  manufactured  by  cooking  foxes  and  hyenas,  some 
alive  and  some  dead,  whole  in  oil.^  Galen  discusses  with 
perfect  seriousness  the  relative  strength  of  various  animal 
fats,  those  of  the  goose,  hen,  hyena,  goat,  pig,  and  so  forth.^^ 
He  decides  that  lion's  fat  is  by  far  the  most  potent,  with 
that  of  the  pard  next.  Among  his  simples  are  also  found 
the  slough  of  a  snake,  a  sheepskin,  the  lichens  of  horses,  a 
spider's  web,^^  and  burnt  young  swallows,  for  whose  intro- 
duction into  medicine  he  gives  Asclepiades  credit.^^     Of 


'XII,  248,  284-85,  290. 

'XII,  293. 

*  XIV,  255.   (To  Piso  on  theriac.) 

*XII,  291-92. 

"XII,  298. 

'  XII,  304. 

'  XII,  342. 


"XII,  276-77. 

"XII,  367-69. 

"XIII,  949-50,  954-55. 

"XII,  343.  These  form  the 
titles  of  four  successive  chapters, 
De  simplic,  XI,  i,  caps.  19-22. 

"  XII,  359.  942-43,  977. 


IV  GALEN  169 

Archigenes'  prescriptions  for  toothache  he  repeats  that  which 
recommended  holding  for  some  time  in  the  mouth  a  frog 
boiled  in  water  and  vinegar,  or  a  dog's  tooth,  burnt,  pul- 
verized, and  boiled  in  vinegar.^  Cavities  may  be  filled  with 
toasted  earth-worms  or  spiders'  eggs  diluted  with  unguent 
of  nard.  Teething  infants  are  benefited,  if  their  gums  are 
moistened  with  dog's  milk  or  anointed  with  hare's  brains.^ 
For  colic  he  recommends  dried  cicadas  with  three,  five,  or 
seven  grains  of  pepper.^ 

Galen  is  less  confident  as  to  the  efficacy  for  earache  of  Some 
the  multipedes  which  roll  themselves  up  into  a  ball,  and  ^"^^^  icism. 
which,  cooked  in  oil,  are  employed  especially  by  rural 
doctors.^  He  is  still  more  sceptical  whether  the  liver  of  a 
mad  dog  will  cure  its  bite.^  Many  say  so,  and  he  knows  of 
some  who  have  tried  it  and  survived,  but  they  took  other 
remedies  too.^  Galen  has  heard  that  some  who  trusted  to 
it  alone  died.  In  one  treatise  "^  Galen  discusses  the  strange 
virtues  of  the  basilisk  in  much  the  usual  way,  but  in  his  work 
on  simples  ^  he  remarks  drily  that  it  is  obviously  impossible 
to  employ  it  in  pharmacy,  since,  if  the  tales  about  it  be  true, 
men  cannot  see  it  and  live  or  even  approach  it  without  dan- 
ger. He  therefore  will  not  include  it  or  elephants  or  Nile 
horses  (hippopotamuses?)  or  any  other  animals  of  which 
he  has  had  no  personal  experience. 

Galen  tries  to  find  some  satisfactory  explanation  of  the  Doctrine 
strange  properties  which  he  believes  exist  in  so  many  things,  virtue 
The  attractive  power  of  the  magnet  and  of  drugs  suggests 
to  him  that  nature  in  us  is  divine,  as  Homer  says,  and  leads 
like  to  like  and  thus  shows  its  divine  virtues.^  Galen  re- 
jects Epicurus's  explanation  of  the  magnet's  attractive 
power.^°  It  was  that  the  atoms  flowing  off  from  both  the 
magnet  and  iron  fit  one  another  so  closely  that  the  two  sub- 

^  XII,  856.  hydrophobia,   only  tends  to  make 

'  XII,  860.  their    recovery    seem    the    more 

'  XII,  360.  marvelous. 

*XII,  366-67.  'XIV,  233. 

'XII,  335.  "  XII,  250-51. 

•  A  fact  which — one  cannot  help  ®  XIV,  224-25. 

remarking — considering  the  char-  "II,  45-48. 
acter  of  most  ancient  remedies  for 


170 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


stances  are  drawn  together.  Galen  objects  that  this  does  not 
explain  how  a  whole  series  of  rings  can  be  suspended  in  a 
row  from  a  magnet.  Galen's  teacher  Pelops,  who  claimed 
to  be  able  to  tell  the  cause  of  everything,  explained  why- 
ashes  of  river  crabs  are  used  for  the  bite  of  a  mad  dog  as 
follows.^  The  crab  is  efficacious  against  hydrophobia  be- 
cause it  is  an  aquatic  animal.  River  crabs  are  better  for 
this  purpose  than  salt  water  crabs  because  salt  dries  up 
moisture.  He  also  thought  the  ashes  of  crabs  very  potent  in 
absorbing  the  venom.  But  this  type  of  reasoning  is  unsat- 
isfactory to  Galen,  who  finds  the  best  explanation  of  all 
such  action  in  the  peculiar  property,  or  occult  virtue,  of  the 
substance  as  a  whole.  Upon  this  subject  ^  he  proposes  to 
write  a  separate  treatise,  and  in  the  fragment  De  substantia 
facultatum  naturalium  ( irepl  ovalas  rdv  ^vclkuiv  dvvannav  )  he 
again  discusses  the  matter.^ 

Among  parts  of  animals  Galen  regarded  the  flesh  of 
vipers  as  especially  medicinal,  particularly  as  an  antidote 
to  poisons.  Of  the  following  cures  wrought  by  vipers'  flesh 
which  Galen  narrates  '^  two  were  repeated  without  giving  him 
credit  by  Aetius  of  Amida  in  the  sixth,  and  Bartholomew 
of  England  in  the  thirteenth  century,  and  doubtless  by  other 
writers.  When  Galen  was  a  youth  in  Asia,  some  reapers 
found  a  dead  viper  in  their  jug  of  wine  and  so  were  afraid 
to  drink  any  of  it.  Instead  they  gave  it  to  a  man  near  by 
who  suffered  from  the  terrible  skin  disease  elephantiasis  and 
whom  they  thought  it  would  be  a  mercy  to  put  quietly  out 
of  his  misery.  He  drank  the  wine  but  instead  of  dying  re- 
covered from  his  disease.  A  similarily  unexpected  cure  was 
effected  when  a  slave  wife  in  Mysia  tried  to  kill  her  hus- 


^XII,  358-59.  Concerning  the 
virtue  of  river  crabs  we  may  also 
quote  from  a  story  told  in  Nias 
Island,  west  of  Sumatra:  "for 
bad  he  only  eaten  river  crabs,  men 
would  have  cast  their  skin  like 
crabs,  and  so,  renewing  their 
youth  perpetually,  would  never 
have  died." — From  J.  G.  Frazer 
(1918),  I,  67.    The  belief  that  the 


serpent  annually  changes  its  skin 
and  renews  its  youth  may  account 
for  the  virtues  ascribed  to  the 
flesh  of  vipers  and  to  theriac  in 
the  following  paragraphs, 

'  TTtpi  Toip  idioTTjTL  TJjj  oXijs  oialas 
evepyovvTCJV. 

'  IV,  760-61,  ivepyelv  rds  oialas  kot' 
15  lav  iKacrT-qv  4>vaLV. 

«XII,  311-15. 


IV  GALEN  171 

band  by  offering  him  a  like  drink.  A  third  case  was  that 
of  a  patient  whom  Galen  told  of  these  two  previous  cures. 
After  resorting-  to  augTiry  to  learn  if  he  too  should  try  it 
and  receiving  a  favorable  response,  the  patient  drank  wine 
infected  by  venom  with  the  result  that  his  elephantiasis 
changed  into  leprosy,  which  Galen  cured  a  little  later  with 
the  usual  drugs.  A  fourth  man,  while  hunting  vipers,  was 
stung  by  one.  Galen  bled  him,  extracted  black  bile  with  a 
drug,  and  then  made  him  eat  the  vipers  which  he  had  caught 
and  which  were  prepared  in  oil  like  eels.  A  fifth  man, 
warned  by  a  dream,  came  from  Thrace  to  Pergamum.  An- 
other dream  instructed  him  both  to  drink,  and  to  anoint  him- 
self with,  a  concoction  of  vipers.  This  changed  his  disease 
into  leprosy  which  in  its  turn  was  cured  by  drugs  which  the 
god  prescribed. 

The  flesh  of  vipers  was  an  important  ingredient  in  the  Theriac. 
famous  antidote  and  remedy  called  theriac,  concerning  which 
Galen  wrote  two  special  treatises  ^  besides  discussing  it  in 
his  works  on  simples  and  antidotes.  Mithridates,  like  King 
Attains  in  Galen's  native  land,  had  tested  the  effects  of  vari- 
ous drugs  upon  condemned  criminals,  and  had  thus  dis- 
covered antidotes  against  spiders,  scorpions,  sea-hares,  aco- 
nite, and  other  poisons.  He  then  combined  the  results  of 
his  research  into  one  grand  compound  which  should  be  an 
antidote  against  any  and  every  poison.  But  he  did  not  in- 
clude the  flesh  of  the  viper,  which  was  added  with  some 
other  changes  by  Andromachus,  chief  physician  to  Nero.^ 
The  divine  Marcus  Aurelius  used  to  take  a  dose  of  theriac 
daily  and  it  had  since  come  into  general  use.^  Galen  gives 
a  long  list  of  ills  which  it  will  cure,  including  the  plague 
and  hydrophobia,'^  and  adds  that  it  is  beneficial  in  keeping 
a  man  in  good  health.^  He  advises  its  use  when  traveling 
or  in  wintry  weather,  and  tells  Piso  that  it  will  prolong  his 
life.^     He  explains  more  than  once''^  how  to  prepare  the 

^  Ad  Pisonem  de   theriaca;  De  ^  XIV,  271-80. 

theriaca  ad  Pamphilianum.  °  XIV,  283. 

'  XIV,  2-3.  "  XIV,  294. 

"XIV,  217.  'XII,  317-18;  XIV,  45-46,  238. 


iy2 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Magical 
com- 
pounds. 


viper's  flesh,  why  the  head  and  tail  must  be  cut  off,  how  it 
is  cleaned  and  boiled  until  the  flesh  falls  from  the  backbone, 
how  it  is  mixed  with  pounded  bread  into  pills,  how  the  flesh 
of  the  viper  is  best  in  early  summer.  Galen  also  accepts  the 
legend,^  quoting  six  lines  of  verse  from  Nicander  to  that 
effect,  that  the  viper  conceives  in  the  mouth  and  then  bites 
off  the  male's  head,  and  that  the  young  viper  avenges  its 
father's  death  by  gnawing  its  way  out  of  its  mother's  vitals. 
The  Mar  si  at  Rome  denied  the  existence  of  the  dips  as  or 
snake  whose  bite  causes  one  to  die  of  thirst,  but  Galen  is 
not  quite  sure  whether  to  agree  with  them. 

Already  we  have  had  occasion  to  refer  to  Galen's  two 
works  on  compound  medicines  which  occupy  the  better  part 
of  two  bulky  volumes  in  Kiihn's  edition  and  contain  a  vast 
number  of  prescriptions.  It  is  not  uncommon  for  one  of 
these  to  contain  as  many  as  twenty-five  ingredients.  It 
seems  unlikely  that  such  elaborate  concoctions  would  have 
been  discovered  by  chance,  as  the  Empirics  held,  but  the 
modem  reader  is  ready  to  agree  that  it  was  chance,  if  any- 
one was  ever  cured  of  anything  by  one  of  them.  Yet  Galen, 
as  we  have  seen,  believes  that  reasons  can  be  given  for  the 
ingredients  and  would  not  for  a  moment  admit  that  they 
are  no  better  than  the  messes  of  witches'  cauldrons.  He 
argues  that,  if  all  diseases  could  be  cured  by  simples,  no 
one  would  use  compounds,  but  that  they  are  essential  for 
some  diseases,  especially  such  as  require  the  simultaneous 
application  of  contrary  virtues.-  Also  where  a  simple  is  too 
strong  or  weak,  it  can  be  toned  up  or  down  to  just  the  right 
strength  in  a  compound.  Plasters  and  poultices  seem  al- 
ways to  be  compounds.  Of  panaceas  Galen  is  somewhat 
more  chary,  except  in  the  case  of  theriac ;  he  opines  that  a 
medicine  which  is  good  for  a  number  of  ills  cannot  be  very 
good  for  any  one  of  them.' 

Procedure  as  well  as  substances  suggestive  of  magic  is 
found  to  some  extent  in  Galen's  works.     He  instructs,  for 


*XIV,  238-39. 


'  XIII,  371,  374. 


"XIII,  134. 


IV  GALEN  173 

example,  to  pluck  an  herb  with  the  left  hand  before  sunrise.^ 
He  also  recommends  the  suspension  of  a  peony  to  cure  epi- 
lepsy.- He  saw  a  boy  who  wore  this  root  remain  free  from 
that  disease  for  eight  months,  when  the  root  happened  to 
drop  off  and  the  boy  soon  fell  in  a  fit.  When  another  peony 
root  was  hung-  about  his  neck,  he  remained  in  good  health 
until  Galen  for  the  sake  of  experiment  removed  it  a  second 
time,  whereupon  another  epileptic  fit  ensued  as  before.  In 
this  case  Galen  suggests  that  perhaps  some  particles  from 
the  root  were  drawn  in  by  the  patient's  breathing  or  altered 
the  surrounding  air.  In  another  passage  he  holds  that  there 
is  no  medical  reason  to  account  for  the  virtues  of  amulets, 
but  that  those  who  have  tested  them  by  experience  say  that 
they  act  by  some  marvelous  antipathy  unknown  to  man.^  A 
ligature  recommended  by  Galen  is  to  bind  about  the  neck  of 
the  patient  a  viper  which  has  been  suffocated  by  tying  sev- 
eral strings,  preferably  of  marine  purple,  about  its  neck.* 
Galen  marvels  that  sterciis  lupimim,  even  when  simply  sus- 
pended from  the  neck,  "sometimes  evidently  is  beneficial."  ^ 
It  should  not  have  touched  the  ground  but  should  have  been 
taken  from  trees  or  bushes.  It  also  works  better,  as  Galen 
has  found  in  his  own  practice,  if  suspended  by  the  wool  of 
a  sheep  who  has  been  torn  by  a  wolf. 

While  Galen  thus  employs  ligatures  and  suspensions  and  Incanta- 
sanctions  magic  logic,  he  draws  the  line  at  use  of  images,  characters 
characters,  and  incantations.  In  the  passage  just  cited  he 
goes  on  to  say  that  he  has  found  other  suspended  sub- 
stances efficacious,  but  not  the  barbarous  names  such  as 
wizards  use.  Some  say  that  the  gem  jasper  comforts  the 
stomach  if  bound  about  the  abdomen,^  and  some  wear  it  in 
a  ring  engraved  with  a  dragon  and  rays,"^  as  King  Nechepso 
directs  in  his  fourteenth  book.  Galen  has  employed  it  sus- 
pended about  the  neck  without  any  engraving  upon  it  and 

^XIII,  242,  'XII,  207. 

XI,  859.  '  A       representation       of       the 

°  XII,  573 ;  see  also  XIII,  256.  Agathodaemon ;   see  C.  W.   King, 

XI,  860.  The   Gnostics  and   their  Remains, 

*XII,   295-96.  London,  1887,  p.  220. 


174 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Belief  _ 
in  magic 
dies  hard. 


On  easily 
i)rocurable 
remedies. 


found  it  equally  beneficial.  In  illustrating  the  virtue  of 
human  saliva,  especially  that  of  a  fasting  man,  Galen  tells 
of  a  man  who  promised  him  to  kill  a  scorpion  by  means  of 
an  incantation  which  he  repeated  thrice.  But  at  each  repe- 
tition he  spat  on  the  scorpion  and  Galen  afterwards  killed 
one  by  the  same  procedure  without  any  incantation,  and 
more  quickly  with  the  spittle  of  a  fasting  than  of  a  full 
man.^ 

The  preceding  paragraph  gives  a  good  illustration  of  the 
slow  progress  of  human  thought  away  from  magic  and 
towards  science.  Men  are  discovering  that  marvels  can  be 
worked  as  well  without  characters  and  incantations.  Simi- 
lar passages  may  be  found  in  Arabic  and  Latin  medieval 
writers.  But  while  Galen  questions  images  and  incantations, 
he  still  clings  to  the  notions  of  marvelous  virtue  in  a  fast- 
ing man's  spittle  or  in  a  gem  suspended  about  the  neck. 
And  these  and  other  passages  in  which  he  clung  to  old  super- 
stitions were  unfortunately  equally  influential  upon  suc- 
ceeding writers,  who  sometimes,  we  fear,  took  them  as  an 
excuse  for  further  indulgence  in  magic.  Indeed,  we  shall 
find  Alexander  of  Tralles  in  the  sixth  century  arguing  that 
Galen  finally  became  a  believer  in  the  efficacy  of  incanta- 
tions.   Thus  the  old  notions  and  practices  die  hard. 

In  the  treatise  on  easily  procurable  remedies,  where  pop- 
ular and  rustic  remedies  enter  rather  more  largely  than  in 
Galen's  other  writings,  superstitious  recipes  are  also  met 
with  more  frequently,  and,  if  that  be  possible,  the  doses 
become  even  more  calculated  to  make  one's  gorge  rise,  it 
being  felt  that  the  unfastidious  tastes  and  crude  constitu- 
tions of  peasants  and  the  poorer  classes  can  stand  more  than 
daintier  city  patients.  Another  reason  for  separate  consid- 
eration of  the  contents  of  this  treatise  is  the  possibility,  al- 
ready mentioned,  that  it  is  interpolated  and  misarranged, 
and  the  fact  that  it  is  in  part  of  much  later  date  than  Galen. 


*XII,  288-89.    At  II,  163,  Galen  again  accepts  the  notion  that  human 
saliva  is  fatal  to  scorpions. 


IV  GALEN  175 

We  must  limit  ourselves  to  a  hasty  survey  of  a  few  sped-  Specimens 
mens  of  its  prescriptions.  Following  Archigenes,  ligatures  pgrstitfous 
and  crowns  are  employed  for  headaches.^  In  contrast  to  contents. 
Galen's  previous  scepticism  concerning  depilatories  for  eye- 
brows we  now  find  a  number  mentioned,  including  the  blood 
of  a  bed-bug.^  To  cure  lumbago,^  if  the  pain  is  in  the  right 
foot,  reduce  to  powder  with  your  right  hand  the  wings  of 
a  swallow.  Then  make  an  incision  in  the  swallow's  leg  and 
draw  off  all  its  blood.  Skin  it  and  roast  it  and  eat  it  en- 
tire. Then  anoint  yourself  all  over  with  the  oil  for  three 
days  and  you  will  marvel  at  the  result.  "This  has  been  often 
proved  by  experience."  To  prevent  hair  from  falling  out 
take  many  bees  and  burn  them  and  mix  with  oil  and  use  as 
an  ointment.*  For  a  sty  in  the  eye  catch  flies,  cut  off  their 
heads,  and  rub  the  sty  with  the  rest  of  their  bodies.'^  A 
cooked  black  chameleon  performs  the  double  duty  of  cur- 
ing toothache  and  killing  mice.^  To  extract  a  tooth  in  the 
upper  jaw  surround  it  with  the  worms  found  in  the  tops  of 
cabbages;  for  a  lower  tooth  use  the  worms  on  the  lower 
parts  of  the  leaves.'^  Pain  in  the  intestines  will  vanish,  if 
the  patient  drinks  water  in  which  his  feet  have  been  washed.^ 
A  net  transferred  from  a  woman's  hair  to  the  patient's  head 
acts  as  a  laxative,  especially  if  the  net  is  first  heated.^  Vari- 
ous superstitious  devices  are  suggested  to  insure  the  birth 
of  a  child  of  the  sex  desired.^"  Bituminous  trefoil, ^^  boiled 
and  applied  hot,  cures  snake  or  spider  bite,  but  let  no  one 
use  it  who  is  not  so  afflicted  or  it  will  make  him  feel  as  if 
he  was.^^  For  cataract  is  recommended  a  mixture  of  equal 
parts    of   mouse's   blood,    cock's   gall,    and   woman's  milk, 

*  XIV,  321.  ^  "The  Psoranthea  bituniinosa  oi 
'  XIV,  349.  Linnaeus.     It  is  found  on  declivi- 

*  XIV,  386-87.  ties  near  the  sea-coast  in  the  south 

*  XIV,  343.  of  Europe,"  says  a  note  in  Bostock 
'  XIV,  413.  and  Riley's  The  Natural  History 
-XIV,  427.  of  Pliny  (Bohn  Library),  IV, 
'XIV,  430.  330.  Pliny,  too  (XXI,  88),  states 
*XIV,  471.  that  trefoil  is  poisonous  itself  and 
"XIV,  472.  to  be  used  only  as  a  counter- 
^"XIV,  476.  And  others,  "Ut  ne      poison. 

cui  penis  arrigi  possit,"  and  "Ad  "  XIV,  491 ;  a  good  example  of 

arrectionem  pudendi."  the  power  of  suggestion. 


176 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


External 
signs  of 
the  tem- 
peraments 
of  internal 
organs. 


Marvelous 
statements 
repeated 
by  Mai- 
monides. 


dried. ^  For  pain  on  one  side  of  the  head  or  face  smear  with 
fifteen  earthworms  and  fifteen  grains  of  pepper  powdered 
in  vinegar.-  To  stop  a  cough  wear  the  tongue  of  an  eagle 
as  an  amulet.^  Wearing  a  root  of  rhododendron  makes 
one  fearless  of  dogs  and  would  cure  a  mad  dog  itself,  if  it 
could  be  tied  on  the  animal."^  A  "confection"  covering 
three  pages  is  said  to  prolong  life,  to  have  been  used  by  the 
emperors,  and  to  have  enabled  Pythagoras,  its  inventor,  who 
began  to  make  use  of  it  at  the  age  of  fifty,  to  live  to  be  one 
hundred  and  seventeen  without  disease.  "And  he  was  a 
philosopher  and  unable  to  lie  about  it."  ^ 

It  remains  to  note  what  there  is  in  Galen's  works  in  the 
way  of  divination  and  astrology.  We.  are  not  entirely  sur- 
prised that  contemporary  doctors  confused  his  medical 
prognostic  with  divination,  when  we  read  what  he  has  to 
say  concerning  the  outward  signs  of  hot  or  cold  internal 
organs.  In  the  treatise,  entitled  Th'e  Healing  Art  (jexyrj 
laTpiKT)),^  which  Mewaldt  says  was  the  most  studied  of 
Galen's  works  and  spread  in  a  vast  number  of  medieval 
Latin  manuscript  translations,'^  he  devotes  a  number  of 
chapters  to  such  subjects  as  signs  of  a  hot  and  dry  heart, 
signs  of  a  hot  liver,  and  signs  of  a  cold  lung.  Among  the 
signs  of  a  cold  brain  are  excessive  excrements  from  the 
head,  stiff  straight  red  hair,  a  late  birth,  mal-nutrition,  sus- 
ceptibility to  injury  from  cold  causes  and  to  catarrh,  and 
somnolence.^ 

In  his  commentary  on  the  Aphoristns  of  Hippocrates 
Galen  adds  other  signs  by  which  it  may  be  foretold  whether 
the  child  will  be  a  boy  or  girl  to  those  signs  already  men- 
tioned by  Hippocrates.^  Some  of  these  seem  superstitious 
enough  to  us.  And  it  was  a  case  of  the  evil  that  men  do 
living  after  them,  for  Moses  Maimonides,  the  noted  Jewish 
physician  of  Cordova  in  the  twelfth  century,  in  his  collection 


*XIV,  498. 
*XIV,  502. 
•XIV.  505. 
*XIV,  S17. 
•XIV,  567ff. 


•I,    305-412. 

'GaUn   in   PW. 

'I,   325-6. 

•XVII  B,  212  and  834. 


IV  GALEN  177 

of  Aphorisms,  drawn  chiefly  from  the  works  of  Galen,  re- 
peats the  following  method  of  prognostication :  Puerum 
cum  primo  spermatizat  perscrutare,  quern  si  invenis  habere 
testiculum  dextriim  maiorem  sinistro,  you  will  know  that 
his  first  child  will  be  a  male,  otherwise  female.  The  same 
may  be  determined  in  the  case  of  a  girl  by  a  comparison  of 
the  size  of  her  breasts.  Maimonides  also  repeats,  from 
Galen's  work  to  Caesar  on  theriac,^  the  story  of  the  ugly 
man  who  secured  a  beautiful  son  by  having  a  beautiful  boy 
painted  on  the  wall  and  making  his  wife  keep  her  eyes  fixed 
upon  it.  Maimonides  also  repeats  from  Galen  -  the  story 
of  the  bear's  licking  its  unformed  cubs  into  shape. ^ 

In  another  treatise  on  Diagnosis  from  Dreams  Galen  Dreams, 
makes  a  closer  approach  to  the  arts  of  divination.*  He 
states  that  dreams  are  affected  by  our  daily  life  and  thought, 
and  describes  a  few  corresponding  to  bodily  states  or  caused 
by  them.  He  thinks  that  if  you  dream  you  see  fire,  you  are 
troubled  by  yellow  bile,  and  if  you  dream  of  vapor  or  dark- 
ness, by  black  bile.  In  diagnosing  dreams  one  should  note 
when  they  occurred  and  what  had  been  eaten.  But  Galen 
also  believes  that  to  some  extent  the  future  can  be  predicted 
from  dreams,  as  has  been  testified,  he  says,  by  experience.^ 
We  have  already  mentioned  the  effect  of  his  father's  dream 
upon  Galen's  career.  In  the  Hippocratic  commentaries  ^  he 
says  that  some  scorn  dreams  and  omens  and  signs,  but  that 
he  has  often  learned  from  dreams  how  to  prognosticate  or 
cure  diseases.  Once  a  dream  instructed  him  to  let  blood 
between  the  index  and  great  fingers  of  the  right  hand  until 
the  flow  of  blood  stopped  of  its  own  accord.  "It  is  neces- 
sary," he  concludes,  "to  observe  dreams  accurately  both  as 
to  what  is  seen  and  what  is  done  in  sleep  in  order  that  you 

^  Partic.  6,  Kuhn,   XIV,  253.  edition    of    the    Aphorisms   dated 

'Kijhn,  XIV,  255.  1489    and    numbered    IA.28878    in 

'These  passages  all  come  from  the    British    Museum.     The    same 

the  24th  Particula  of  Maimonides'  section  contains  still  other  marvels 

Aphorisms,  which   is   devoted  es-  from  the  works  of  Galen. 

pecially  to  marvels  : — "Incipit  par-  *  Kiihn,   VI,  832-5. 

ticula  xxiiii  continens  aphorismos  *VI,  833. 

dependentes    a    miraculis    repertis  *  XVI,  222-23. 

in    libris    medicorum,"    from    an 


178 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Lack  of 

astrology 
in  most 
of  Galen's 
medicine. 


The  Prog- 
nostication 
of  Disease 
by  Astrol- 
ogy. 


may  prognosticate  and  heal  satisfactorily."  Perhaps  he 
had  a  dim  idea  along  Freudian  lines. 

In  the  ordinary  run  of  Galen's  pharmacy  and  therapeutics 
there  is  very  little  mention  or  observance  of  astrological 
conditions,  although  Hippocrates  is  cited  as  having  said  that 
a  study  of  geometry  and  astronomy — which  may  v^ell  mean 
astrology — is  essential  in  medicine.^  In  the  De  methodo 
medendi  he  often  urges  the  importance  of  the  time  of  year, 
the  region,  and  the  state  of  the  sky.^  But  this  expression 
seems  to  refer  to  the  weather  rather  than  to  the  position  of 
the  constellations.  The  dog-star  is  also  occasionally  men- 
tioned,^ and  one  passage  ^  tells  how  "Aeschrion  the  Empiric, 
...  an  old  man  most  experienced  in  drugs  and  our  fellow 
citizen  and  teacher,"  burned  live  river  crabs  on  a  plate  of  red 
bronze  after  the  rise  of  the  dog-star  when  the  sun  entered 
Leo  and  on  the  eighteenth  day  of  the  moon.  We  are  also 
informed  that  many  Romans  are  in  the  habit  of  taking 
theriac  on  the  first  or  fourth  day  of  the  moon.^  But  Galen 
ridicules  Pamphilus  for  his  thirty-six  sacred  herbs  of  the 
horoscope — or  decans,  taken  from  an  Egyptian  Hermes 
book.^  On  the  other  hand,  one  of  his  objections  to  the  atom- 
ists  is  that  "they  despise  augury,  dreams,  portents,  and  all 
astrology,"  as  well  as  that  they  deny  a  divine  artificer  of 
the  world  and  an  innate  moral  law  to  the  soul.'^  Thus  athe- 
ism and  disbelief  in  astrology  are  put  on  much  the  same 
plane. 

Whereas  there  is  so  little  to  suggest  a  belief  in  astrology 
in  most  of  Galen's  works,  we  find  among  them  two  devoted 
especially  to  astrological  medicine,  namely,  a  treatise  on 
critical  days  in  which  the  influence  of  the  moon  upon  dis- 
ease is  assumed,  and  the  Prognostication  of  Disease  by 
Astrology.  In  the  latter  he  states  that  the  Stoics  favored 
astrology,  that  Diodes  Carystius  represented  the  ancients 

*I,  S3.  'X,  688;   XIII,  544;   XIV,  285. 

*Coeli   status,   or     1^     KaT&araai^.  ■*  XII,   356. 

X,   593-96,    625,    634,    645,   647-48,  ■'XIV,  298. 

658,  662,  68s,  737.  759-60,  778,  829,  "  XI,  798. 

etc.  'II,  26-28. 


IV  GALEN  179 

as  employing  the  course  of  the  moon  In  prognostications, 
and  that,  if  Hippocrates  said  that  physicians  should  know 
physiognomy,  they  ought  much  more  to  learn  astrology,  of 
which  physiognomy  is  but  a  part.^  There  follows  a  state- 
ment of  the  influence  of  the  moon  in  each  sign  of  the  zodiac 
and  in  its  relations  to  the  other  planets.^  On  this  basis  is 
foretold  what  diseases  a  man  will  have,  what  medical  treat- 
ment to  apply,  whether  the  patient  will  die  or  not,  and  if 
so  in  how  many  days.  This  treatise  is  the  same  as  that  as- 
cribed in  many  medieval  manuscripts  to  Hippocrates  and 
translated  into  Latin  by  both  William  of  Moerbeke  and 
Peter  of  Abano. 

The  treatise  on  critical  days  discusses  them  not  by  rea-   Critical 

days. 
son  or  dogma,  lest  sophists  befog  the  plain  facts,  but  solely, 

we  are  told,  upon  the  basis  of  clear  experience.^  Having 
premised  that  "we  receive  the  force  of  all  the  stars  above,"  "^ 
the  author  presents  indications  of  the  especially  great  influ- 
ence of  sun  and  moon.  The  latter  he  regards  not  as  superior 
to  the  other  planets  in  power,  but  as  especially  governing 
the  earth  because  of  its  nearness.^  He  then  discusses  the 
moon's  phases,  holding  that  it  causes  great  changes  in  the 
air,  rules  conceptions  and  birth,  and  "all  beginnings  of  ac- 
tions," ^  Its  relations  to  the  other  planets  and  to  the  signs 
of  the  zodiac  are  also  considered  and  much  astrological'tech- 
nical  detail  is  introduced.'^  But  the  Pythagorean  theory 
that  the  numbers  of  the  critical  days  are  themselves  the 
cause  of  their  significance  in  medicine  is  ridiculed,  as  is  the 
doctrine  that  odd  numbers  are  masculine  and  even  numbers 
feminine.^  Later  the  author  also  ridicules  those  who  talk 
of  seven  Pleiades  and  seven  stars  in  either  Bear  and  the 
seven  gates  of  Thebes  or  seven  mouths  of  the  Nile.^  Thus 
he  will  not  accept  the  doctrine  of  perfect  or  magic  numbers 
along  with  his  astrological  theory.     Much  of  this  rather 

»XIX,  529-30.  'IX,  908-10. 

^XIX,  534-73.  ^IX,  913. 

'  IX,  794.  *  IX,  922. 

;iX,  901-2.  "IX,  935. 
"  IX,  904. 


i8o 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


On  the 

history 
of  philos- 
ophy. 


Divination 

and 

demons. 


long  treatise  is  devoted  to  a  discussion  of  the  duration  of  a 
moon,  and  it  is  shown  that  one  of  the  moon's  quarters  is  not 
exactly  seven  days  in  length  and  that  the  fractions  affect 
the  incidence  of  the  critical  days. 

A  treatise  on  the  history  of  philosophy,  which  is  marked 
"spurious"  in  Kiihn's  edition,  I  have  also  discovered  among 
the  essays  of  Plutarch  where,  too,  it  is  classed  as  spurious.-^ 
In  some  ways  it  is  suggestive  of  the  middle  ages.  After  an 
account  of  the  history  of  Greek  philosophy  somewhat  in  the 
style  of  the  brief  reviews  of  the  same  to  be  found  in  the 
church  fathers,  it  adds  a  sketch  of  the  universe  and  natural 
phenomena  not  dissimilar  to  some  medieval  treatises  of 
like  scope.  There  are  chapters  on  the  universe,  God,  the 
sky,  the  stars,  the  sun,  the  moon,  the  viagmis  annus,  the 
earth,  the  sea,  the  Nile,  the  senses,  vision  and  mirrors,  hear- 
ing, smell  and  taste,  the  voice,  the  soul,  breathing,  the  proc- 
esses of  generation,  and  so  on. 

In  discussing  divination  ^  the  treatise  states  that  Plato 
and  the  Stoics  attributed  it  to  God  and  to  divinity  of  the 
spirit  in  ecstasy,  or  to  interpretation  of  dreams  or  astrol- 
ogy or  augury.  Xenophanes  and  Epicurus  denied  it  en- 
tirely. Pythagoras  admitted  only  divination  by  hariispices 
or  by  sacrifice.  Aristotle  and  Dicaearchus  admit  only  div- 
ination by  enthusiasm  and  by  dreams.  For  although  they 
deny  that  the  human  soul  is  immortal,  they  think  that  there 
is  something  divine  about  it.  Herophilus  said  that  dreams 
sent  by  God  must  come  true.  Other  dreams  are  natural, 
when  the  mind  forms  images  of  things  useful  to  it  or  about 
to  happen  to  it.  Still  others  are  fortuitous  or  mere  reflec- 
tions of  our  desires.  The  treatise  also  takes  up  the  subject 
of  heroes  and  demons.^     Epicurus  denied  the  existence  of 


*Kuhn,  XIX,  22-345.  Plutarch, 
Opera,  ed.  Didot,  De  placitis 
philosophorum,  pp.  1065-1114;  in 
Plutarch's  Miscellanies  and  Es- 
says, English  translation,  1889, 
III,  104-92.  The  wording  of  the 
two  versions  differs  somewhat  and 
in    Galen's    works    it    is    divided 


simply  into  2>7  chapters,  whereas 
in  Plutarch's  works  it  is  divided 
into  five  books  and  many  more 
chapters. 

'  XIX,  320-21 ;  De  plac.  philos., 
V,  1-2. 

*XIX,  253;  De  plac.  philos., 
1,8. 


bodies. 


IV  GALEN  i8i 

either,  but  Thales,  Plato,  Pythagoras,  and  the  Stoics  agree 
that  demons  are  natural  substances,  while  heroes  are  souls 
separate  from  bodies,  and  are  good  or  bad  according  to  the 
lives  of  the  men  who  lived  in  those  bodies. 

The  treatise  also  gives  the  opinions  of  various  Greek  Celestial 
philosophers  on  the  question  whether  the  universe  or  its 
component  spheres  are  either  animals  or  animated.  Fate  is 
defined  on  the  authority  of  Heracleitus  as  "the  heavenly 
body,  the  seed  of  the  genesis  of  all  things."  ^  The  question 
is  asked  why  babies  born  after  seven  months  live,  while  those 
born  after  eight  months  die.^  On  the  other  hand,  a  very 
brief  discussion  of  how  the  stars  prognosticate  does  not  go 
into  particulars  beyond  their  indication  of  seasons  and 
weather,  and  even  this  Anaximenes  ascribed  to  the  effect 
of  the  sun  alone.  ^  Philolaus  the  Pythagorean  is  quoted  con- 
cerning some  lunar  water  about  the  stars^  which  reminds 
one  of  the  waters  above  the  firmament  in  the  first  chapter  of 
Genesis. 

*Kuhn,  XIX,  261-62;  De  placitis  'XIX,  274;  De  plac.  philos.,  II, 

philosophorum,  I,  28 ;  "  ij  6i  et^uap-  19. 
nkvTj  e<JTiv   aidkpiop  awfia.  aitkpua  r^s- 

T03V  ■jr&UTwv  ytveaeus."  *  XIX,     265 ;     De    plac.    philos., 

'XIX,  333.  11,5. 


The 
sources. 


CHAPTER  V 

ANCIENT  APPLIED   SCIENCE   AND   MAGIC:   VITRUVIUS^    HERO, 
AND  THE  GREEK  ALCHEMISTS 

The  sources — Vitruvius  depicts  architecture  as  free  from  magic — 
But  himself  beheves  in  occult  virtues  and  perfect  numbers — Also  in 
astrology — Divergence  between  theory  and  practice,  learning  and  art — 
Evils  in  contemporary  learning — Authorities  and  inventions — Machines 
and  Ctesibius — Hero  of  Alexandria — Medieval  working  over  of  the 
texts — Hero's  thaumaturgy — Instances  of  experimental  proof — Magic 
jugs  and  drinking  animals — Various  automatons  and  devices — Magic 
mirrors — Astrology  and  occult  virtue — Date  of  extant  Greek  alchemy 
^Legend  that  Diocletian  burned  the  books  of  the  alchemists — Alchem- 
ists' own  accounts  of  the  history  of  their  art — Close  association  of 
Greek  alchemy  with  magic — Mystery  and  allegory — Experiment:  rela- 
tion to  science  and  philosophy. 

"doctum  ex  omnibus  solum  neque  in  alienis  locis  peregri- 
num  .  .  .  sed  in  omni  civitate  esse  civem." 

— Vitruvius,  VI,  Introd.  2. 

This  chapter  will  examine  what  may  be  called  ancient  ap- 
plied science  and  its  relations  to  magic,  taking  observations 
at  three  different  points,  the  ten  books  of  Vitruvius  on  ar- 
chitecture, the  collection  of  writings  which  pass  under  the 
name  of  Hero  of  Alexandria,  and  the  compositions  of  the 
Greek  alchemists.  The  remains  of  Greek  and  Roman  liter- 
ature in  the  field  of  applied  science  are  scanty,  not  because 
they  were  not  treasured,  and  even  added  to,  by  the  periods 
following,  but  apparently  because  there  had  thus  far  been 
so  little  development  in  the  way  of  machinery  or  of  power 
other  than  manual  and  animal.  So  we  must  make  the  best 
of  what  we  have.  The  writings  to  be  considered  are  none 
of  them  earlier  than  the  period  of  the  Roman  Empire  but 

182 


CHAP.  V  ANCIENT  APPLIED  SCIENCE  183 

like  other  writings  of  that  time  they  more  or  less  reflect  the 
scientific  achievements  or  the  occult  lore  of  the  preceding 
Hellenistic  period. 

Vitruvius  lived  just  at  the  beginning  of  the  Empire  Vitruvius 
under  Julius  and  Augustus  Caesar.  He  is  not  much  of  a  chhecture 
writer,  but  architecture  as  set  forth  in  his  book  appears  as  free 

'  ,  .  .  from 

sane,  straightforward,  and  solid.  The  architect  is  repre-  magic, 
sented  as  going  about  his  business  with  scarcely  any  admix- 
ture of  magical  procedure  or  striving  after  marvelous  results. 
The  combined  guidance  of  practical  utility  and  of  high 
standards  of  art — Vitruvius  stresses  reality  and  propriety 
now  and  again,  and  has  little  patience  with  mere  show — per- 
haps accounts  for  this  high  degree  of  freedom  from  super- 
stition. Perhaps  permanent  building  is  an  honest,  down- 
right, open,  constructive  art  where  error  is  at  once  apparent 
and  superstition  finds  little  hold.  If  so,  one  wonders  how 
there  came  to  be  so  much  mystery  enveloping  Free-Masonry. 
At  any  rate,  not  only  in  his  building  directions,  but  even  in 
his  instructions  for  the  preparation  of  lime,  stucco,  and 
bricks,  or  his  discussion  of  colors,  natural  and  artificial, 
Vitruvius  seldom  or  never  embodies  anything  that  can  be 
called  magical.^ 

This  is  the  more  noteworthy  because  passages  in  the  very  Occult 
same  work  show  him  to  have  accepted  some  of  the  theories  nuniber. 
which  we  have  associated  with  magic.  Thus  he  appears  to 
believe  in  occult  virtues  and  marvelous  properties  of  things 
in  nature,  since  he  affirms  that,  while  Africa  in  general 
abounds  in  serpents,  no  snake  can  live  within  the  boundaries 
of  the  African  city  of  Ismuc,  and  that  this  is  a  property  of 
the  soil  of  that  locality  which  it  retains  when  exported.^ 
Vitruvius    also    mentions    some   marvelous    waters.      One 

^As   much   can  hardly  be   said  mind   one   forcibly   and   painfully 

of     our     present     day    architects,  of   the  deceits   and  levitations   of 

whose   fantastic  tin  cornices  pro-  magicians. 

jecting  far  out  from  the  roofs  of  ^  De  architectura,  ed.  F.  Krohn, 

high  buildings  and  rows  of  stones  Leipzig,   Teubner,   1912,  VIII,  iii, 

poised  horizontally  in  midair,  with  24.     A  recent  English  translation 

no    other    visible    support    than   a  of  Vitruvius  is  by  M.  H.  Morgan, 

elate   glass   window   beneath,    re-  Harvard  University  Press,  1914. 


i84  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

breaks  every  metallic  receptacle  and  can  be  retained  only  in 
a  mule's  hoof.  Some  springs  intoxicate;  others  take  away 
the  taste  for  wine.  Others  produce  fine  singing  voices.-^ 
Vitruvius  furthermore  speaks  of  six  and  ten  as  perfect  num- 
bers and  contends  that  the  human  body  is  symmetrical  in 
the  sense  that  the  distances  between  the  different  parts  are 
exact  fractions  of  the  whole. ^  He  also  tells  how  the  Py- 
thagoreans composed  books  on  the  analogy  of  the  cube,  al- 
lowing in  any  one  treatise  no  more  than  three  books  of  216 
lines  each.^ 

Vitruvius  also  more  than  once  implies  his  confidence  in 
the  art  of  astrology.  In  mapping  out  the  ground-plan  of  his 
theater  he  advises  inscribing  four  equilateral  triangles  with- 
in the  circumference  of  a  circle,  "as  the  astrologers  do  in  a 
figure  of  the  twelve  signs  of  the  zodiac,  when  they  are  mak- 
ing computations  from  the  musical  harmony  of  the  stars."  * 
I  cannot  make  out  that  there  is  any  astrological  significance 
or  magical  virtue  in  this  so  far  as  the  arrangement  of  the 
theater  is  concerned,  but  it  shows  that  Vitruvius  and  his 
readers  are  familiar  with  the  technique  of  astrology  and  the 
trigona  of  the  signs.  In  another  passage,  comparing  the 
physical  characteristics  and  temperaments  of  northern  and 
southern  races,  which  astrologers  generally  interpreted  as 
evidence  of  the  influence  of  the  constellations  upon  mankind, 
Vitruvius  patriotically  contends  that  the  inhabitants  of  Italy, 
and  especially  the  Romans,  represent  a  happy  medium  be- 
tween north  and  south,  combining  the  greater  courage  of  the 
northerners  with  the  keener  intellects  of  the  southerners, 
just  as  the  planet  Jupiter  is  a  golden  mean  between  the  ex- 
treme influences  of  Mars  and  Saturn.  So  the  Romans  are 
fitted  for  world  rule,  overcoming  barbarian  valor  by  their 
superior  intelligence  and  the  devices  of  the  southerners  by 
their  valor.^  In  a  third  passage  Vitruvius  says  more  ex- 
pressly of  the  art  of  astrology :     "As   for  the  branch  of 

^VIII,   iii,    16,   20-21,  24-5.  *V,  vi,  I.     The  wording  is  that 

*  III,  i.  of  Morgan's  translation. 

•V,  Introduction,  3-4.  'VI,  i,  3-4.  9-io. 


V  ANCIENT  APPLIED  SCIENCE  185 

astronomy  which  concerns  the  influences  of  the  twelve  signs, 
the  five  stars,  the  sun,  and  the  moon  upon  human  Hfe,  we 
must  leave  all  this  to  the  calculations  of  the  Chaldeans,  to 
whom  belongs  the  art  of  casting  nativities,  which  enables 
them  to  declare  the  past  and  the  future  by  means  of  calcula- 
tions based  on  the  stars.  These  discoveries  have  been 
transmitted  by  men  of  genius  and  great  acuteness  who 
sprang  directly  from  the  nations  of  the  Chaldeans ;  first  of  all, 
by  Berosus,  who  settled  in  the  island  state  of  Cos,  and  there 
opened  a  school.  Afterwards  Antipater  pursued  the  sub- 
ject; then  there  was  Archinapolus,  who  also  left  rules  for 
casting  nativities,  based  not  on  the  moment  of  birth  but  on 
that  of  conception."  After  listing  a  number  of  natural 
philosophers  and  other  astronomers  and  astrologers,  Vitru- 
vius  concludes :  "Their  learning  deserves  the  admiration  of 
mankind;  for  they  were  so  solicitous  as  even  to  be  able  to 
predict,  long  beforehand,  with  divining  mind,  the  signs  of 
the  weather  which  was  to  follow  in  the  future."^ 

Such  a  passage  demonstrates  plainly  enough  Vitruvius'   Diver- 
full  confidence  in  the  art  of  casting  nativities  and  of  weather  5e"^een 
prediction,  but  it  has  no  integral  connection  with  his  prac-  theory  and 

,•11-  ....        practice, 

tical  architecture  or  even  any  necessary  connection  with  the  learning 
construction  of  a  sun-dial,  which  is  what  he  is  actually  driv-  ^"*^  ^^^' 
ing  at.  But  Vitruvius  believed  that  an  architect  should  not 
be  a  mere  craftsman  but  broadly  educated  in  history,  medi- 
cine, and  philosophy,  geometry,  music,  and  astronomy,  in 
order  to  understand  the  origin  and  significance  of  details 
inherited  from  the  art  of  the  past,  to  assure  a  healthy  build- 
ing, proper  acoustics,  and  the  like.  It  is  in  an  attempt  to  air 
his  learning  and  in  the  theoretical  portions  of  his  work  that 
he  is  prone  to  occult  science.  But  the  practical  processes 
of  architecture  and  military  engineering  are  free  from  it. 

The  attitude  of  Vitruvius  towards  other  architects  of   Evils  in 
his  own  age,  to  past  authorities,  and  to  personal  experimen-  porlry ' 
tation  is  of  interest  to  note,  and  roughly  parallels  the  atti-  learning. 
tude  of  Galen  in  the  field  of  medicine.    Like  Galen  he  com- 
*  IX,  vi,  2-3,  Morgan's  translation. 


i86 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Authori- 
ties and 
inventions. 


plains  that  the  artist  must  plunge  into  the  social  life  of  the 
day  in  order  to  gain  professional  success  and  recognition.^ 
"And  since  I  observe  that  the  unlearned  rather  than  the 
learned  are  held  in  high  favor,  deeming  it  beneath  me  to 
struggle  for  honors  with  the  unlearned,  I  will  rather  demon- 
strate the  virtue  of  our  science  by  this  publication."  ^  He 
also  objects  to  the  self-assertion  and  advertising  of  them- 
selves in  which  many  architects  of  his  time  indulge.^  He 
recognizes,  however,  that  the  state  of  affairs  was  much  the 
same  in  time  past,  since  he  tells  a  story  how  the  Macedonian 
architect,  Dinocrates,  forced  himself  upon  the  attention  of 
Alexander  the  Great  solely  by  his  handsome  and  stately  ap- 
pearance,* and  since  he  asserts  that  the  most  famous  artists 
of  the  past  owe  their  celebrity  to  their  good  fortune  in  work- 
ing for  great  states  or  men,  while  other  artists  of  equal 
merit  are  seldom  heard  of.^  He  also  speaks  of  those  who 
plagiarize  the  writings  of  others,  especially  of  the  men  of 
the  past.^  But  all  this  does  not  lead  him  to  despair  of  art 
and  learning;  rather  it  confirms  him  in  the  conviction  that 
they  alone  are  really  worth  while,  and  he  quotes  several 
philosophers  to  that  effect,  including  the  saying  of  Theo- 
phrastus  that  "the  learned  man  alone  of  all  others  is  no 
stranger  even  in  foreign  lands  .  .  .  but  is  a  citizen  in  every 
city."  ' 

In  contradistinction  to  the  plagiarists  Vitruvius  expresses 
his  deep  gratitude  to  the  men  of  the  past  who  have  written 
books,  and  gives  lists  of  his  authorities,^  and  declares  that 
"the  opinions  of  learned  authors  .  .  .  gain  strength  as  time 


^III,  Introduction,  3,".  .  .  There 
should  be  the  greatest  indignation 
when,  as  often,  good  judges  are 
flattered  by  the  charm  of  social 
entertainments  into  an  approba- 
tion  which   is   a   mere   pretence." 

^  Idem. 

'VI,  Introduction,  5. 

*  II,  Introduction.  Vitruvius 
continues,  "But  as  for  rtie.  Em- 
peror, nature  has  not  given  me 
stature,  age  has  marred  my  face, 
and   my   strength  is   impaired   by 


ill  health.  Therefore,  since  these 
advantages  fail  me,  I  shall  win 
your  approval,  as  I  hope,  by  the 
help  of  my  knowledge  and  my 
writings." 

"  III,  Introduction,  2. 

*VII,  Introduction,  i-io. 

'VI,  Introduction,  2.  Also  IX, 
Introduction,  where  authors  are 
declared  superior  to  the  victorious 
athletes  in  the  Olympian,  Pythian, 
Isthmian,  and  Nemean  games. 

"VII,  Introd.,  11-14;  IX,  Introd. 


V  ANCIENT  APPLIED  SCIENCE  187 

goes  on."  *  "Relying  upon  such  authorities,  we  venture  to 
produce  new  systems  of  instruction."  ^  Or,  as  he  says  in 
discussing  the  properties  of  waters,  "Some  of  these  things 
I  have  seen  for  myself,  others  I  have  found  written  in  Greek 
books."  ^  But  in  describing  sun-dials  he  frankly  remarks, 
"I  will  state  by  whom  the  different  classes  and  designs  of 
dials  have  been  invented.  For  I  cannot  invent  new  kinds 
myself  at  this  late  day,  nor  do  I  think  that  I  ought  to  dis- 
play the  inventions  of  others  as  my  own."  *  He  also  gives 
an  account  of  a  number  of  notable  miscellaneous  discoveries 
and  experiments  by  past  mathematicians  and  physicists.^ 
Also  he  sometimes  repeats  the  instruction  which  he  had  re- 
ceived from  his  teachers.  Like  Pliny  a  little  later  he  thinks 
that  in  some  respects  artistic  standards  have  been  lowered 
in  his  own  time,  notably  in  fresco-painting.^  But  also,  like 
Galen,  he  once  admits  that  there  are  still  good  men  in  his 
own  profession  besides  himself,  affirming  that  "our  archi- 
tects in  the  old  days,  and  a  good  many  even  in  our  own 
times,  have  been  as  great  as  those  of  the  Greeks."  '^  He  de- 
scribes a  basilica  which  he  himself  had  built  at  Fano.^ 

Vitruvius's  last  book  is  devoted  to  machines  and  mili-  Machines 
tary  engines.  Here  he  makes  a  feeble  effort  to  introduce  Qesibius 
the  factor  of  astrological  influence,  asserting  that  "all  ma- 
chinery is  derived  from  nature,  and  is  founded  on  the  teach- 
ing and  instruction  of  the  revolution  of  the  firmament."  ^ 
Among  the  devices  described  is  the  pump  of  Ctesibius  of 
Alexandria,  the  son  of  a  barber.^°  He  had  already  been 
mentioned  in  the  preceding  book  ^^  for  the  improvements 
which  he  introduced  in  water-clocks,  especially  regulating 
their  flow  according  to  the  changing  length  of  the  hours  of 
the  day  in  summer  and  winter.  Vitruvius  also  asserts  that 
he  constructed  the  first  water  organs,  that  he  "discovered 

'IX,   Introd.,   17.  'VII,  Introd.,   18. 

;vn,   Introd.,   10.  «V,  i,  6-ia 

'VIII,  in,  27.  »Y    ;\, 
*  IX,  vii,  7.  -^'  ''  4- 

''IX,  Introd.  "X,  vii. 

'VII,  V.  "IX,  viii. 


i88  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

the  natural  pressure  of  the  air  and  pneumatic  principles,  .  .  . 
devised  methods  of  raising  water,  automatic  contrivances, 
and  amusing  things  of  many  kinds,  .  .  .  blackbirds  singing 
by  means  of  vi^aterworks,  and  angohatae,  and  figures  that 
drink  and  move,  and  other  things  that  have  been  found  to 
be  pleasing  to  the  eye  and  the  ear."  ^  Vitruvius  states  that 
of  these  he  has  selected  those  that  seemed  most  useful  and 
necessary  and  that  the  reader  may  turn  to  Ctesibius's  own 
works  for  those  which  are  merely  amusing.  Pliny  more 
briefly  mentions  the  invention  of  pneumatics  and  water  or- 
gans by  Ctesibius.^ 

This  characterization  by  Vitruvius  of  the  writings  of 
Ctesibius  also  applies  with  astonishing  fitness  to  some  of  the 
works  current  under  the  name  of  Hero  of  Alexandria,"  ^  who 
is  indeed  in  a  Vienna  manuscript  of  the  Belopoiika  spoken 
of  as  the  disciple  or  follower  of  Ctesibius.*  Hero,  however, 
is  not  mentioned  either  by  Vitruvius  or  Pliny,  and  it  is  now 
generally  agreed  as  a  result  of  recent  studies  that  he  belongs 
to  the  second  century  of  our  era.^  His  writings  are  objec- 
tive and  impersonal  and  tell  us  much  less  about  himself  than 
Vitruvius's  introductions  to  the  ten  books  of  De  architectura. 

nX,  viii,  2  and  4;  X,  vii,  4.  appeared,    1899,    1900,    1903,    1912, 

'NH,  VII,  38.  1914,    including    respectively,    the 

*The'  work  of  Martin,  Recher-  Pneumatics  and   Automatic _  The- 

ches  sur   la  vie   et   les   ouvrages  ater,  the  Mechanics  and  Mirrors, 

d'Heron  d'Alexandrie,  Paris,  1854,  the     Metrics     and     Dioptra,     the 

and  the  accounts  of  Hero  in  his-  DeHnitions    and     geometrical     re- 

tories  of  physics  and  mathematics  mains,      Stereometrica     and     De 

such  as  those  of  Heller  and  Cajori,  mensuris  and  De  geodaesia.     For 

must  now  be  supplemented  by  the  the  Belopoiika   or  work  on  mili- 

long  article  in  Pauly  and  Wissowa,  tary     engines     see     C.     Wescher, 

Realencyclopddie    der    classischen  Poliorcctique     des     Grecs,     Paris, 

Altertums-imssenschaft,      (1912),  1867.      In    English   we   have    The 

cols.    992-1080.     A    recent  briefer  Pneumatics    of    Hero    of    Alex- 

summary  in  English  is  the  article  andria,     translated      for      Bennet 

by  T.  L.  Heath,  EB,  nth  edition,  Woodcroft   by   J.    G.   Greenwood, 

XIII,    378.      See    also    Hammer-  London,   1851.     A  number  of  ar- 

Jensen,  Ptolemaios  und  Heron,  in  tides  on  Hero  by  Heiberg,  Carra 

Hermes,  XLVIII    (1913),  p.   224,  de  Vaux,  Schmidt,  and  others  will 

et  seq.  be    found    in    Bibliotheca   Mathe- 

The  writings  ascribed  to  Hero,  matica  and  Sudhoff's  Archiv  f.  d. 

hitherto    scattered   about   in  vari-  Gesch.  d.  Naturiviss.  u.  d.  Tech- 

ous    for    the    most    part    inacces-  nik. 

sible  editions  and  MSS,  are  now  * irapi 'HpajTOj  KTT7cri/3foi;. 

appearing    in    a    single    Teubner  "Heath  in  EB,  XIII,  378;  Hei- 

edition,  of   which  five  vols,  have  berg  (1914).  V,  ix. 


c  ANCIENT  APPLIED  SCIENCE  189 

The  similarity  in  content  of  his  writings  to  those  of  the 
much  earher  Ctesibius  as  well  as  the  character  of  his  ter- 
minology suggest  that  he  stands  at  the  end  of  a  long  develop- 
ment. He  speaks  of  his  own  discoveries,  but  perhaps  in 
the  main  simply  continues  and  works  over  the  previous  prin- 
ciples and  mechanisms  of  men  like  Ctesibius.  As  things 
stand,  however,  his  works  constitute  our  most  important, 
and  often  our  only,  source  for  the  history  of  exact  science 
and  of  technology  in  antiquity.^ 

Not  only  does  Hero  seem  to  have  been  in  large  measure  Medieval 
a  compiler  and  continuer  of  previous  science,  his  works  also  "^^^j.  ^^^ 
have  evidently  been  worked  over  and  added  to  in  subsequent  ^^e  texts, 
periods  and  bear  marks  of  the  Byzantine,  Arabian,  and  medi- 
eval Latin  periods  as  well  as  of  the  Hellenistic  and  Roman. 
Indeed  Heiberg  regards  the  Geometry  and  De  stereometricis 
and  De  mensuris  as  later  Byzantine  collections  which  have 
perhaps  made  some  use  of  the  works  of  Hero,  while  the  De 
geodaesia  is  an  epitome  of,  or  extract  from,  a  pseudo- 
Heronic  collection.  The  Catoptrica  is  known  only  from  the 
Latin  translation  of  1269,  probably  by  William  of  Moerbeke, 
and  long  known  as  Ptolemy  on  Mirrors.  It  appears,  how- 
ever, to  be  directly  translated  from  the  Greek  and  not  from 
the  Arabic.  The  Mechanics,  on  the  other  hand,  is  known 
only  from  the  Arabic  translation  by  Costa  ben  Luca.  Of 
the  Pneumatics  we  have  Greek,  Arabic,  and  Latin  versions. 
It  was  apparently  known  to  the  author  of  the  thirteenth  cen- 
tury Summa  philosophiae  ascribed  to  Robert  Grosseteste, 
since  he  speaks  of  the  investigations  of  vacuums  made  by 
"Hero,  that  eminent  philosopher,  with  the  aid  of  water- 
clocks,  siphons,  and  other  instruments."  ^  Scholars  are  of 
the  opinion  that  the  Arabic  adaptation,  which  is  of  popular 
character  and  limited  to  the  entertaining  side,  comes  closer  to 
the  original  Greek  version  of  Hero's  time  than  does  the  Latin 
version  which  devotes  more  attention  to  experimental  phys- 
ics. The  Automatic  Theater,  for  which  there  is  the  same 
*  PW,  Heron.  *  Baur  (1912),  p.  417. 


ipo 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Hero's 

thau- 

maturgy. 


Instances 
of  experi- 
mental 
proof. 


chief  manuscript  as  for  the  Pneumatics,  also  seems  to  have 
been  worked  over  and  added  to  a  great  deal. 

From  Vitruvius's  allusions  to  the  works  of  Ctesibius  and 
from  a  survey  of  those  works  current  under  Hero's  name 
which  are  chiefly  concerned  with  mechanical  contrivances 
and  devices,  the  modern  reader  gets  the  impression  that,  aside 
from  military  engines  and  lifting  appliances,  the  science  of 
antiquity  was  applied  largely  to  purposes  of  entertainment 
rather  than  practical  usefulness.  However,  in  Hero's  case 
at  least  there  is  something  more  than  this.  His  apparatus 
and  experiments  are  not  intended  so  much  to  divert  as  to 
deceive  the  spectator,  and  not  so  much  to  amuse  as  to  as- 
tound him.  The  mechanism  is  usually  concealed ;  the  cause 
acts  indirectly,  intermediately,  or  from  a  distance  to  pro- 
duce an  apparently  marvelous  result.  It  is  a  case  of  thau- 
maturgy,  as  Hero  himself  says,^  of  apparent  magic.  In  fine, 
the  experimental  and  applied  scientist  is  largely  interested 
in  vying  with  the  feats  of  the  magicians  or  supplying  the 
temples  and  altars  of  religion  with  pseudo-miracles. 

The  introduction  or  proemium  to  the  Pneumatics  is 
rather  more  truly  scientific  and  has  been  called  an  unusual 
instance  in  antiquity  of  the  use  as  proof  of  purposive  ob- 
servation of  nature  and  experiment.  Thus  the  existence  of 
air  is  demonstrated  by  the  experiment  of  pressing  an  in- 
verted vessel,  kept  carefully  upright,  into  water,  which  will 
not  enter  the  vessel  because  of  the  resistance  offered  by  the 
air  already  within  the  vessel.  Or  the  elasticity  of  air  and 
the  existence  of  empty  spaces  between  its  particles  is  shown 
by  the  experiment  of  blowing  more  air  into  a  globe  through 
a  siphon,  and  then  holding  one's  finger  over  the  orifice.  As 
soon  as  the  finger  is  removed  the  surplus  air  rushes  out 
with  a  loud  report.  Along  with  such  admirable  experimental 
proof,  however,  the  introduction  contains  some  astonishingly 
erroneous  assertions,  such  as  that  "slime  and  mud  are  trans- 
formations of  water  into  earth,"  and  that  air  released  from 

^  In  the  first  chapter  of  the  structed  such  things  thaumaturges 
Automatic  Theater  he  says,  "The  because  of  the  astounding  charac- 
ancicnls    called    those    who    con-      tcr  of  tlie  spectacle." 


V  ANCIENT  APPLIED  SCIENCE  191 

a  vessel  under  water  "is  transformed  so  as  to  become  water." 
Hero  believes  that  heat  and  light  rays  are  particles  of  matter 
which  penetrate  the  interstices  between  the  particles  com- 
posing air  and  water. 

The  Pneumatics  consist  of  some  seventy-eight  theorems  Magic 
or  experiments  or  tricks,  call  them  what  you  will,  which  in  ^j^fn^lng 
different  manuscripts  and  editions  are  variously  grouped  in  animals. 
a  single  book  or  two  books.  The  same  idea  or  method, 
however,  is  often  repeated  in  the  different  chapters.  Thus 
we  encounter  over  half  a  dozen  times  the  magic  water-jar 
or  drinking  horn  from  which  either  wine  or  water  or  a  mix- 
ture of  both  can  be  poured,  or  a  choice  of  other  liquids. 
And  in  all  these  cases  the  explanation  of  the  trick  is  the 
same.  When  the  air-hole  in  the  top  of  the  vessel  is  closed 
so  that  no  air  can  enter,  the  liquid  will  not  flow  out  through 
the  narrow  orifice  in  the  bottom.  Changes  are  rung  on  this 
principle  by  means  of  inner  compartments  and  connecting 
tubes.  Different  kinds  of  siphons,  the  bent,  the  enclosed, 
and  the  uniform  discharge,  are  described  in  the  opening  chap- 
ters and  are  utilized  in  working  the  ensuing  wonders,  such 
as  statues  of  animals  which  drink  water  offered  to  them, 
inexhaustible  goblets  or  those  that  will  not  overflow,  and 
harmonious  jars.  By  this  last  expression  is  meant  pairs  of 
vessels,  secretly  connected  by  tubes  and  so  arranged  that 
nothing  will  flow  from  one  until  the  other  is  filled,  when 
wine  will  pour  from  one  jar  and  water  from  the  other.  Or 
when  water  is  poured  into  one  jar,  wine  or  mixed  wine  and 
water  flows  from  the  other.  Or,  when  water  is  drawn  off 
from  one  jar,  wine  flows  from  the  other.  Other  vessels 
are  made  to  commence  or  cease  to  pour  out  wine  or  water, 
when  a  little  water  is  poured  in.  Others  will  receive  no 
more  water  once  you  have  ceased  pouring  it  in,  no  matter 
how  little  may  have  been  poured  in,  or,  when  you  cease  for 
a  moment  to  pour  water  in  and  then  begin  again,  will  not 
resume  their  outpour  until  half  full.  In  another  case  the 
water  will  not  flow  out  of  a  hole  in  the  bottom  of  the  ves- 
sel at  all  until  the  vessel  is  entirely  filled.     Others  are  made 


192 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Various 
automa- 
tons and 
devices. 


Magic 
mirrors. 


to  flow  by  dropping  a  coin  in  a  slot  or  working  a  lever,  or 
turning  a  wheel.  In  the  last  case  the  vessel  of  water  is  con- 
cealed behind  the  entrance  column  of  a  temple.  In  one  magic 
drinking  horn  the  flow  of  water  from  the  bottom  is  checked 
by  putting  a  cover  over  the  open  top.  When  another  pitcher 
is  tipped  up,  the  same  amount  of  liquid  will  always  fk)w  out. 

In  half  a  dozen  chapters  mechanical  birds  are  made  to 
sing  by  driving  air  through  a  pipe  by  the  pressure  of  flowing 
water.  In  other  chapters  a  dragon  is  made  to  hiss  and  a 
thyrsus  to  whistle  by  similar  methods.  By  the  force  of 
compressed  air  water  is  made  to  spurt  forth  and  automatons 
to  sound  trumpets.  The  heat  of  the  sun's  rays  is  used  to 
warm  air  which  expands  and  causes  water  to  trickle  out.  In 
a  number  of  cases  as  long  as  a  fire  burns  on  an  altar  the 
expansion  of  enclosed  air  caused  thereby  opens  temple 
doors  by  the  aid  of  pulleys,  or  causes  statues  to  pour  liba- 
tions, dancing  figures  to  revolve,  and  a  serpent  to  hiss.  The 
force  of  steam  is  used  to  support  a  ball  in  mid-air,  revolve 
a  sphere,  and  make  a  bird  sing  or  a  statue  blow  a  horn.  In- 
exhaustible lamps  are  described  as  well  as  inexhaustible 
goblets,  and  a  self -trimmed  lamp  in  which  a  float  resting  on 
the  oil  turns  a  cog-wheel  which  pushes  up  the  wick  as  it  and 
the  oil  are  consumed.  Floats  and  cog-wheels  are  also  used  in 
some  of  the  tricks  already  mentioned.  In  another  the  flow 
of  a  liquid  from  a  vessel  is  regulated  by  a  float  and  a  lever. 
Cog-wheels  are  also  employed  in  constructing  the  neck  of 
an  automaton  so  that  it  can  be  cut  completely  through  with 
a  knife  and  yet  the  head  not  be  severed  from  the  body.  A 
cupping  glass,  a  syringe,  a  fire  engine  pump  with  valves 
and  pistons,  a  hydraulic  organ  and  one  worked  by  wind 
pretty  much  exhaust  the  contents  of  the  Pneumatics.  In  its 
introduction  Hero  alludes  to  his  treatise  in  four  books  on 
water-clocks,  but  this  is  not  extant.  Hero's  water-organ  is 
regarded  as  more  primitive  than  that  described  by  Vitruvius.* 

If  magic  jugs  and  marvelous  automatons  make  up  most 
of  the  contents  of  the  Pneumatics  and  Automatic  Theater, 

*PW,  1045. 


V  ANCIENT  APPLIED  SCIENCE  193 

comic  and  magic  mirrors  play  a  prominent  part  m  the 
Catoptrics.  The  spectator  sees  himself  upside  down,  with 
three  eyes,  two  noses,  or  an  otherwise  distorted  counte- 
nance. By  means  of  two  rectangular  mirrors  which  open  and 
close  on  a  common  axis  Pallas  is  made  to  spring  from  the 
head  of  Zeus.  Instructions  are  given  how  to  place  mirrors 
so  that  the  person  approaching  will  see  no  reflection  of  him- 
self but  only  whatever  apparition  you  select  for  him  to  see. 
Thus  a  divinity  can  be  made  suddenly  to  appear  in  a  temple. 
Clocks  are  also  described  where  figures  appear  to  announce 
the  hours. 

Hero  displays  a  slight  tendency  in  the  direction  of  as-  Astrology 
trology,  discussing  the  music  of  the  spheres  in  the  first  ^?^  occult 
chapters  of  the  Catoptrics,  and  in  the  Pneumatics  describing 
an  absurdly  simple  representation  of  the  cosmos  by  means 
of  a  small  sphere  placed  in  a  circular  hole  in  the  partition 
between  two  halves  of  a  transparent  sphere  of  glass.  One 
hemisphere  is  to  be  filled  with  water,  probably  in  order  to 
support  the  ball  in  the  center.^  The  marvelous  virtues  of 
animals  other  than  automatons  are  rather  out  of  his  line,  but 
he  alludes  to  the  virtue  of  the  marine  torpedo  which  can 
penetrate  bronze,  iron,  and  other  bodies. 

Although  we  have  seen  some  indications  of  its  earlier  ex-  Date  01 
istence  in  Egypt,  alchemy  seems  to  have  made  its  appear-   q^^^^^ 
ance  in  the  ancient  Greek-speaking  and  Latin  world  only  at  alchemy. 
a  late  date.     There  seems  to  be  no  allusion  to  the  subject 
in  classical  literature  before  the  Christian  era,  the  first  men- 
tion being  Pliny's  statement  that  Caligula  made  gold  from 
orpiment.^     The  papyri  containing  alchemistic  texts  are  of 

^But  perhaps  this  is  a  medieval  came  the  planets,  then  the  sun"^ 

interpolation   in   the   nature   of   a  Orr    (1913),    P-   63    and    Fig.    13. 

crude  Christian  attempt  to  depict  See  also  K.  Tittel,  "Das  Weltbild 

"the  firmament  in  the  midst  of  the  bei  Heron,"  in  Bibl.  Math.  (1907- 

waters"  (Genesis,  I,  6).  However,  1908),  pp.  ii3-7- 

it    also    somewhat    resembles    the  ^  Berthelot  (1885),  pp.  68-9.   For 

universe  of  the  Greek  philosopher,  the    following    account    of    Greek 

Leucippus,  who  "made  the  earth  a  alchemy  I  have  followed  Berthe- 

hemisphere  with  a  hemisphere  of  lot's  three  works,  Les  Origines  de. 

air  above,   the   whole   surrounded  I'Alchimie,    1885;     Collection    des 

by  the   supporting   crystal   sphere  ancicns  Alchimistes  Grecs,  3  vols., 

which  held  the  moon.    Above  this  1887-1888;    Introduction  a  I'Btude 


194 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Legend 
that  Dio- 
cletian 
burned 
the  books 
of  the 
alchemists. 


the  third  century,  and  the  manuscripts  containing  Greek 
works  of  alchemy,  of  which  the  oldest  is  one  of  the  eleventh 
century  in  the  Library  of  St.  Mark's,  seem  to  consist  of 
works  or  remnants  of  works  written  in  the  third  century 
and  later,  many  being  Byzantine  compilations,  excerpts,  or 
additions.  Also  Syncellus,  the  polygraph  of  the  eighth 
century,  gives  some  extracts  from  the  alchemists. 

Syncellus  and  other  late  writers  ^  are  our  only  extant 
sources  for  the  statement  that  Diocletian  burned  the  books 
of  the  alchemists  in  Egypt,  so  that  they  might  not  finance 
future  revolts  against  him.  If  the  report  be  true,  one  would 
fancy  that  the  imperial  edict  would  be  more  effective  as  a 
testimonial  to  the  truth  of  transmutation  in  encouraging  the 
art  than  it  would  be  in  discouraging  it  by  destroying  a  cer- 
tain amount  of  its  literature.  Thus  the  edict  would  resemble 
the  occasional  laws  of  earlier  emperors  banishing  the 
astrologers — except  their  own — from  Rome  or  Italy  because 
they  had  been  too  free  in  predicting  the  death  of  the  emperor, 
which  only  serve  to  show  what  a  hold  astrology  had  both  on 
emperors  and  people.  But  the  report  concerning  Diocletian 
sounds  improbable  on  the  face  of  it  and  must  be  doubted  for 
want  of  contemporary  evidence.  Certainly  we  are  not  justi- 
fied in  explaining  the  air  of  secrecy  so  often  assumed  by 
writers  on  alchemy  as  due  to  the  fear  of  persecution  which 
this  action  of  Diocletian  ^  or  the  fear  of  being  accused  of 
magic  aroused  in  them.  Persons  who  wish  to  keep  matters 
secret  do  not  rush  into  publication,  and  the  air  of  secrecy  of 
the  alchemists  is  too  often  evidently  assumed  for  purposes  of 


de  la  Chimie,  1889.  Berthelot 
made  a  good  many  books  from 
too  few  MSS;  went  over  the  same 
ground  repeatedly ;  and  sometimes 
had  to  correct  his  previous  state- 
ments ;  but  still  remains  the  full- 
est account  of  the  subject.  E.  O. 
V.  Lippmann,  Entstehung  und  Aus- 
breitung  der  Alchemie,  1919,  is 
still  based  largely  on  Berthelot's 
publications.  In  English  see  C. 
A.  Browne,  "The  Poem  of  the 
Philosopher  Theophrastos  upon 
the     Sacred     Art :     A     Metrical 


Translation  with  Comments  upon 
the  History  of  Alchemy,"  in  The 
Scientific  Monthly,  September, 
1920,  pp.  193-214. 

^  The  earliest  of  them  is  John 
of  Antioch  of  the  reign  of  Herac- 
lius,  about  620  A.D.,  although 
they  seem  to  use  Panodorus,  an 
Egyptian  monk  of  the  reign  of 
Arcadius.  Even  he  would  be  a 
century  removed  from  the  event. 

'Berthelot  (1885),  pp.  26,  72, 
etc.,  took  this  story  about  Diocle- 
tian far  too  seriously. 


V  ANCIENT  APPLIED  SCIENCE  195 

show  and  to  impress  the  reader  with  the  idea  that  they  really 
have  something  to  hide.  Sometimes  the  alchemists  them- 
selves realize  that  this  adoption  of  an  air  of  secrecy  has  been 
overdone.  Thus  Olympiodorus  wrote  in  the  early  fifth  cen- 
tury, "The  ancients  were  accustomed  to  hide  the  truth,  to 
veil  or  obscure  by  allegories  what  is  clear  and  evident  to 
everybody."  ^  Nor  can  we  accept  the  story  of  Diocletian's 
burning  the  books  of  alchemy  as  the  reason  why  none  have 
reached  us  which  can  be  certainly  dated  as  earlier  than  the 
third  century. 

The  alchemists  themselves,  of  course,  claimed  for  their  Akhem- 
art  the  highest  antiquity.    Zosimus  of  Panopolis,  who  seems  account" 
to  have  written  in  the  third  century,  says  that  the  fallen  an-   of  the 
gels  instructed  men  in  alchemy  as  well  as  in  the  other  arts,  their  art. 
and  that  it  was  the  divine  and  sacred  art  of  the  priests  and 
kings  of  Egypt,  who  kept  it  secret.     We  also  have  an  address 
of  Isis  to  her  son  Horus  repeating  the  revelation  made  by 
Amnael,  the  first  of  the  angels  and  prophets.     To  Moses  are 
ascribed  treatises  on  domestic  chemistry  and  doubling  the 
weight  of  gold.^     The  manuscripts  of  the  Byzantine  period 
discuss  what  "the  ancients"  meant  by  this  or  that,  or  purport 
to  repeat  what  someone  else  said  of  some  other  person. 
Zosimus  seems  fond  of  citing  himself  in  the  texts  repro- 
duced by  Berthelot,  so  that  it  may  be  questioned  how  much 
of  his  original  works  has  been  preserved.     Hermes  is  often 
cited  by  the  alchemists,  although  no  work  of  alchemy  as- 
cribed to  him  has  reached  us  from  this  early  period.     To 
Agathodaemon  is  ascribed  a  commentary  on  the  oracle  of 
Orpheus  addressed  to  Osiris,  dealing  with  the  whitening  and 

^Berthelot  (1885),  192-3.  third  century,  later  when  he  had 
*  But  the  Labyrinth  of  Solomon,  secured  the  collaboration  of 
Avhich  Berthelot  (1885),  p.  16,  had  Ruelle  (1888),  I,  156-7,  and  III, 
cited  as  an  example  of  the  sort  of  41,  he  had  to  admit  was  not  even 
ancient  magic  figures  which  had  as  old  as  the  eleventh  century  MS 
been  largely  obliterated  by  Chris-  in  which  it  occurred  but  was  an 
tians,  and  of  the  antiquity  of  addition  in  writing  of  the  four- 
alchemy  among  the  Jews  {ihid.,  p.  teenth  century  and  "a  cabalistic 
54),  although  he  granted  {ibid.,  work  of  the  middle  ages  which 
p.  171)  that  it  might  not  be  as  old  does  not  belong  to  the  old  tradi- 
as  the  Papyrus  of  Leyden  of  the  tion  of  the  Greek  alchemists." 


196  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

yellowing  of  metals  and  other  alchemical  recipes.  Other 
favorite  authorities  are  Ostanes,  whom  we  have  elsewhere 
heard  represented  as  the  introducer  of  magic  into  the  Greek 
world,  and  the  philosopher  Democritus,  whom  the  alchem- 
ists represent  as  the  pupil  of  Ostanes  and  whom  we  have 
already  heard  Pliny  charge  with  devotion  to  magic.  Seneca 
says  in  one  of  his  letters  that  Democritus  discovered  a  proc- 
ess to  soften  ivory,  that  he  prepared  artificial  emerald,  and 
colored  vitrified  substances.  Diogenes  Laertius  ascribes  to 
him  a  work  on  the  juices  of  plants,  on  stones,  minerals, 
metals,  colors,  and  coloring  glass.  This  was  possibly  the 
same  as  the  four  books  on  coloring  gold,  silver,  stones,  and 
purple  ascribed  to  Democritus  by  Synesius  in  the  fifth,  and 
Syncellus  in  the  eighth,  century.  More  recent  presumably 
than  Ostanes  and  Democritus  are  the  female  alchemists,  Cleo- 
patra and  Mary  the  Jewess,  although  one  text  represents 
Ostanes  and  his  companions  as  conversing  with  Cleopatra. 
A  few  of  the  spurious  works  ascribed  to  these  authors  may 
have  come  into  existence  as  early  as  the  Hellenistic  period, 
but  those  which  have  reached  us,  at  least  in  their  present 
form,  seem  to  bear  the  marks  of  the  Christian  era  and  later 
centuries  of  the  Roman  Empire,  if  not  of  the  early  medieval 
and  Byzantine  periods.  And  those  authors  whose  names 
seem  genuine  :  Zosimus,  Synesius,  Olympiodorus,  Stephanus, 
are  of  the  third,  fourth  and  fifth  centuries,  at  the  earliest. 
Close  The  associations  of  the  names  above  cited  and  the  fact 

association  ^j^^^  pseudo-literature  forms  so  large  a  part  of  the  early  lit- 
alchemy  erature  of  alchemy  suggest  its  close  connection  at  that  time 
with  magic.  Whereas  Vitruvius,  although  not  personally  in- 
hospitable to  occult  theory,  showed  us  the  art  of  architecture 
free  from  magic,  and  Hero  told  how  to  perform  apparent 
magic  by  means  of  mechanical  devices  and  deceits,  the  Greek 
alchemists  display  entire  faith  in  magic  procedure  with  which 
their  art  is  indissolubly  intermingled.  Indeed  the  papyri  in 
which  works  of  alchemy  occur  are  primarily  magic  papyri,  so 
that  alchemy  may  be  said  to  spring  from  the  brow  of  magic. 
The  same  is  only  somewhat  less  true  of  the  manuscripts.    In 


with 
magic 


V  ANCIENT  APPLIED  SCIENCE  197 

the  earliest  one  of  the  eleventh  century  the  alchemy  is  in  the 
company  of  a  treatise  on  the  interpretation  of  dreams,  a 
sphere  of  divination  of  life  or  death,  and  magic  alphabets. 
The  treatises  of  alchemy  themselves  are  equally  impregnated 
with  magic  detail.  Cleopatra's  art  of  making  gold  employs 
concentric  circles,  a  serpent,  an  eight-rayed  star,  and  other 
magic  figures.  Physica  et  mystica,  ascribed  to  Democritus, 
after  a  purely  technical  fragment  on  purple  dye,  invokes  his 
master  Ostanes  from  Hades,  and  then  plunges  into  alchem- 
ical recipes.  There  are  also  frequent  bits  of  astrology  and 
suggestions  of  Gnostic  influence.  Often  the  encircling  ser- 
pent Ouroboros,  who  bites  or  swallows  his  tail,  is  referred 
to.^  Sometimes  the  alchemist  puts  a  little  gold  into  his  mix- 
ture to  act  as  a  sort  of  nest  tgg,  or  mother  of  gold,  and  en- 
courage the  remaining  substance  to  become  gold  too.^  Or 
we  read  in  a  work  ascribed  to  Ostanes  of  "a  divine  water" 
which  "revives  the  dead  and  kills  the  living,  enlightens  ob- 
scurity and  obscures  what  is  clear,  calms  the  sea  and 
quenches  fire.  A  few  drops  of  it  give  lead  the  appearance 
of  gold  with  the  aid  of  God,  the  invisible  and  all-power- 
ful. .  .  ."3 

These  early  alchemists  are  also  greatly  given  to  mystery  Mystery 
and  allegory.  "Touch  not  the  philosopher's  stone  with  your  ^{j^ 
hands,"  warns  Mary  the  Jewess,  "you  are  not  of  our  race, 
you  are  not  of  the  race  of  Abraham."  ^  In  a  tract  concern- 
ing the  serpent  Ouroboros  we  read,  "A  serpent  is  stretched 
out  guarding  the  temple.  Let  his  conqueror  begin  by  sac- 
rifice, then  skin  him,  and  after  having  removed  his  flesh 
to  the  very  bones,  make  a  stepping-stone  of  it  to  enter  the 
temple.  Mount  upon  it  and  you  will  find  the  object  sought. 
For  the  priest,  at  first  a  man  of  copper,  has  changed  his 
color  and  nature  and  become  a  man  of  silver;  a  few  days 
later,  if  you  wish,  you  will  find  him  changed  into  a  man  of 
gold."  ^     Or   in  the  preparation   of   the   aforesaid   divine 

'Berthelot  (1885),  p.  59.  *  Berthelot  (1885),  p.  56. 

*  Ibid.,  p.  53.  »  Berthelot  ( 1888) ,  III,  23. 

•Berthelot  (1888),  III,  2SI. 


198 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Experi- 
mentation 
in  al- 
chemy : 
relation  to 
science 
and  philos- 
ophy. 


water  Ostanes  tells  us  to  take  the  eggs  of  the  serpent  of  oak 
who  dwells  in  the  month  of  August  in  the  mountains  of 
Olympus,  Libya,  and  the  Taurus.^  Synesius  tells  that 
Democritus  was  initiated  in  Egypt  at  the  temple  of  Memphis 
by  Ostanes,  and  Zosimus  cites  the  instruction  of  Ostanes, 
"Go  towards  the  stream  of  the  Nile ;  you'll  find  there  a  stone ; 
cut  it  in  two,  put  in  your  hand,  and  take  out  its  heart,  for 
its  soul  is  in  its  heart."  ^  Zosimus  himself  often  resorts  to 
symbolic  jargon  to  obscure  his  meaning,  as  in  the  descrip- 
tion of  the  vision  of  a  priest  who  was  torn  to  pieces  and  who 
mutilated  himself.^  He,  too,  personifies  the  metals  and 
talks  of  a  man  of  gold,  a  tin  man,  and  so  on.*  A  brief 
example  of  his  style  will  have  to  suffice,  as  these  allegories 
of  the  alchemists  are  insufferably  tedious  reading.  "Finally 
I  had  the  longing  to  mount  the  seven  steps  and  see  the  seven 
chastisements,  and  one  day,  as  it  chanced,  I  hit  upon  the 
path  up.  After  several  attempts  I  traversed  the  path,  but 
on  my  return  I  lost  my  way  and,  profoundly  discouraged, 
seeing  no  way  out,  I  fell  asleep.  In  my  dream  I  saw  a  lit- 
tle man,  a  barber,  clothed  in  purple  robe  and  royal  raiment, 
standing  outside  the  place  of  punishment,  and  he  said  to 
me.  .  .  ."  ^  When  Zosimus  was  not  dreaming  dreams  and 
seeing  visions,  he  was  usually  citing  ancient  authorities. 

At  the  same  time  even  these  early  alchemists  cannot  be 
denied  a  certain  scientific  character,  or  at  least  a  connection 
with  natural  science.  Behind  alchemy  existed  a  constant 
experimental  progress.  "Alchemy,"  said  Berthelot,  "rested 
upon  a  certain  mass  of  practical  facts  that  were  known  in 
antiquity  and  that  had  to  do  with  the  preparation  of  metals, 
their  alloys,  and  that  of  artificial  precious  stones;  it  had  there 
an  experimental  side  which  did  not  cease  to  progress  during 
the  entire  medieval  period  until  positive  modern  chemistry 
emerged  from  it."  ^  The  various  treatises  of  the  Greek  al- 
chemists describe  apparatus  and  experiments  which  are  real 
'Berthelot    (1888),   III,  251.  *Ibid.,  p.  60. 

'Berthelot   (1885),  p.  164.  HI^'Is^''"'     ^'^^'     "'     "^"^' 

'Ibid.,  pp.   179-80.  'Berthelot    (1885),   pp.   21 1-2. 


V  ANCIENT  APPLIED  SCIENCE  199 

but  with  which  they  associated  resuhs  which  were  impos- 
sible and  visionary.  Their  theories  of  matter  seem  indebted 
to  the  earher  Greek  philosophers,  while  in  the  description 
of  nature  Berthelot  noted  a  "direct  and  intimate"  relation 
between  them  and  the  works  of  Dioscorides,  Vitruvius,  and 
Pliny.i 

*  Berthelot  (1889),  p.  vi. 


CHAPTER  VI 
Plutarch's  essays 

Themes  of  ensuing  chapters — Life  of  Plutarch — Superstition  in  Plu- 
tarch's Lives — His  Morals  or  Essays — Question  of  their  authenticity — 
Magic  in  Plutarch — Essay  on  Superstition — Plutarch  hospitable  toward 
some  superstitions — The  oracles  of  Delphi  and  of  Trophonius — Divina- 
tion justified — Demons  as  mediators  between  gods  and  men — Demons 
in  the  moon :  migration  of  the  soul — Demons  mortal :  some  evil — Men 
and  demons — Relation  of  Plutarch's  to  other  conceptions  of  demons — 
The  astrologer  Tarrutius — De  fato — Other  bits  of  astrology — Cosmic 
mysticism — Number  mysticism — Occult  virtues  in  nature — Asbestos — 
On  Rivers  and  Mountains — Magic  herbs — Stones  found  in  plants  and 
fish — Virtues  of  other  stones — Fascination — Animal  sagacity  and  reme- 
dies— Theories  and  queries  about  nature — The  Antipodes. 


ensumg 
chapters 


Themes  of  HAVING  noted  the  presence  of  magic  in  works  so  espe- 
cially devoted  to  natural  science  as  those  of  Pliny,  Galen, 
and  Ptolemy,  we  have  now  to  illustrate  the  prominence  both 
of  natural  science  and  of  magic  in  the  life  and  thought  of 
the  Roman  Empire  by  a  consideration  of  some  writers  of  a 
more  miscellaneous  character,  who  should  reflect  for  us 
something  of  the  interests  of  the  average  cultured  reader  of 
that  time.  Of  this  type  are  Plutarch,  Apuleius  and  Philos- 
tratus,  whom  we  shall  consider  in  the  coming  chapters  in 
the  order  named,  which  also  roughly  corresponds  to  their 
chronological  sequence. 

Plutarch  flourished  during  the  reigns  of  Trajan  and 
Hadrian  at  the  turn  of  the  first  and  second  centuries,  but 
The  Letter  on  the  Education  of  a  Prince  to  Trajan  ^ 
probably  is  not  by  him,  and  the  legend  that  Hadrian  was  his 
pupil  is  a  medieval  invention.  He  was  born  in  Boeotia  about 
46-48  A.  D.  and  was  educated  in  rhetoric  and  philosophy, 
science  and  mathematics,  at  Athens,  where  he  was  a  student 

^  De  institutione  principis  epistola  ad  Traianum,  a  treatise  extant 
only  in  Latin  form. 


Life  of 
Plutarch 


CHAP.  VI  PLUTARCH'S  ESSAYS  201 

when  Nero  visited  Greece  in  66  A.  D.  He  also  made 
several  visits  to  Rome  and  resided  there  for  some  time.  He 
held  various  public  positions  in  the  province  of  Achaea  and 
in  his  small  native  tov^n  of  Chaeronea,  and  had  official  con- 
nections with  the  Delphic  oracle  and  amphictyony.  Artemi- 
dorus  in  the  Oneirocriticon  states  that  Plutarch's  death  was 
foreshadowed  in  a  dream.  ^ 

With  Plutarch's  celebrated  Lives  of  Illustrious  Men,  as  Super- 
with  narrative  histories  in  general,  we  shall  not  be  much  piutarch's 
concerned,  although  they  of  course  abound  in  omens  and  L.^'^es. 
portents,  in  bits  of  pseudo-science  which  details  in  his  nar- 
rative bring  to  the  mind  of  the  biographer,  and  in  cases  of 
divination  and  magic.  Thus  theories  are  advanced  to  ex- 
plain why  birds  dropped  dead  from  mid-air  at  the  shout  set 
up  by  the  Greeks  at  the  Isthmian  games  when  Flamininus 
proclaimed  their  freedom.  Or  we  are  told  how  Sulla  re- 
ceived from  the  Chaldeans  predictions  of  his  future  great- 
ness, how  in  the  dedication  to  his  Memoirs  he  admonished 
Lucullus  to  trust  in  dreams,  and  how  Lucullus's  mind  was 
deranged  by  a  love  philter  administered  by  his  freedman  in 
the  hope  of  increasing  his  master's  affection  towards  him.^ 
Such  allusions  and  incidents  abound  also  of  course  in  Dio 
Cassius,  Tacitus,  and  other  Roman  historians. 

But  we  shall  be  concerned  rather  with  Plutarch's  other  His 
writings,  which  are  usually  grouped  together  under  the  title  Essays.  ^^ 
of  Morals,  or,  more  appropriately,  Miscellanies  and  Es- 
says. Not  only  is  there  great  variety  in  their  titles,  but  in 
any  given  essay  the  attention  is  usually  not  strictly  held  to 
one  theme  or  problem  but  the  discussion  diverges  to  other 
points.  Some  are  by  their  very  titles  and  form  rambling 
dialogues,  symposiacs,  and  table-talk,  where  the  conversation 
lightly  flits  from  one  topic  to  other  entirely  different  ones, 
never  dwelling  for  long  upon  any  one  point  and  never  re- 

^  IV,  72.     On  the  biography  and  ode,"  pp.  367fF. 

bibUography   of    Plutarch    consult  '  See   also   the   essay,   "Whether 

Christ,     Gesch.     d.     Griechischen  an  old  man  should  engage  in  poli- 

Litteratur,  5th  ed.,   Munich,   1913,  tics,"  cap.  16. 
II,   2,    "Die    nachklassische    Peri- 


202 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Question 

of  their 
authen- 
ticity. 


Magic  in 
Plutarch. 


turning  to  its  starting-point.  This  dinner-table  and  drink- 
ing-bout type  of  cultured  and  semi-learned  discourse  has 
other  extant  ancient  examples  such  as  the  Attic  Nights  of 
Aulus  Gellius  and  the  Deipnosophists  of  Athenaeus,  but 
Plutarch  will  have  to  serve  as  our  main  illustration  of  it. 
His  Essays  reflect  in  motley  guise  and  disordered  array  the 
fruits  of  extensive  reading  and  a  retentive  memory  in  ancient 
philosophy,  science,  history,  and  literature. 

The  authenticity  of  some  of  the  essays  attributed  to  him 
has  been  questioned,  and  very  likely  with  propriety,  but  for 
our  purpose  it  is  not  important  that  they  should  all  be  by 
the  same  author  so  long  as  they  represent  approximately  the 
same  period  and  type  of  literature.  The  spurious  treatise, 
De  placitis  philosophorimi,  we  have  already  considered  in 
the  chapter  on  Galen,  to  whom  it  has  also  been  ascribed.  The 
essay  On  Rivers  and  Mountains  we  shall  treat  by  itself  in 
the  present  chapter.  The  De  fato  has  also  been  called  spuri- 
ous.^ Superstitious  content  is  not  a  sufficient  reason  for 
denying  that  a  treatise  is  by  Plutarch,^  since  he  is  super- 
stitious in  writings  of  undoubted  genuineness  and  since  we 
have  found  the  leading  scientists  of  the  time  unable  to  ex- 
clude superstition  from  their  works  entirely.  Moreover, 
many  of  the  essays  are  in  the  form  of  conversations  ex- 
pressing the  divergent  views  of  different  speakers,  and  it  is 
not  always  possible  to  tell  which  shade  of  opinion  Plutarch 
himself  favors.  Suffice  it  that  the  views  expressed  are  those 
of  men  of  education. 

Plutarch  does  not  specifically  discuss  magic  under  that 
name  at  any  length  in  any  of  his  essays,  but  does  treat  of 


*  See  R.  Schmertosch,  in  PhiloL- 
Hist.  Beitr.  z.  Ehren  Wachsmuths, 
1897,  pp.  28ff. 

'  Language  and  literary  form  are 
surer  guides  and  have  been  ap- 
plied by  B.  Weissenberger,  Die 
Sprache  Plutarchs  von  Ch'dronea 
und  die  pseudoplutarchischen 
Schriften,  II  Progr.  Straubing, 
1896,  pp.  I5ff.  In  1876  W.  W. 
Goodwin,  editing  a  revised  edition 


of  the  seventeenth  century  English 
translation  of  the  Morals,  de- 
clared that  no  critical  translation 
was  possible  until  a  thorough  re- 
vision of  the  text  had  been  under- 
taken with  the  help  of  the  best 
MSS.  Since  then  an  edition  of 
the  text  by  G.  N.  Bernadakes, 
1888-1896,  has  appeared,  but  it  has 
not  escaped  criticism. 


VI  PLUTARCH'S  ESSAYS  203 

such  subjects  as  superstition  in  general,  dreams,  oracles, 
demons,  number,  fate,  the  craftiness  of  animals,  and  other 
"natural  questions."  Certain  vulgar  forms  of  magic,  at 
least,  were  regarded  by  him  with  disapproval  or  incredul- 
ity.^ He  rejects  as  a  fiction  the  statement  that  the  women 
of  Thessaly  can  draw  down  the  moon  by  their  spells,  but 
thinks  that  the  notion  perhaps  originated  in  the  fact  or  story 
that  Aglaonice,  daughter  of  Hegetor,  was  so  skilful  in  as- 
trology or  astronomy  as  to  be  able  to  foresee  the  occurrence 
of  lunar  eclipses,  and  that  she  deluded  the  people  into  believ- 
ing that  at  such  times  she  brought  down  the  moon  from 
heaven  by  charms  and  enchantments.-  Thus  we  have  one 
more  instance  of  the  union  of  magic  and  science,  this  time 
of  pseudo-magic  with  real  science  as  at  other  times  of  magic 
with  pseudo-science. 

The  essay  entitled  vrepl  btiaibaniovlas  deals  with  super-  Essay  on 
stition  in  the  usual  Greek  sense  of  dread  or  excessive  g^^^^jj. 
fear  of  demons  and  gods.  We  are  accustomed  to  think  of 
Hellenic  paganism  as  a  cheerful  faith,  full  of  naturalism,  in 
which  the  gods  were  humanized  and  made  familiar.  Plu- 
tarch apparently  regards  normal  religion  as  of  this  sort,  and 
attacks  the  superstitious  dread  of  the  supernatural.  He  con- 
tends that  such  fear  is  worse,  if  anything,  than  atheism,  for 
it  makes  men  more  unhappy  and  is  an  equal  offense  against 
the  divinity,  since  it  is  at  least  as  bad  to  believe  ill  of  the 
gods  as  not  to  believe  in  them  at  all.  Nothing  indeed  encour- 
ages the  growth  of  atheism  so  much  as  the  absurd  practices 
and  beliefs  of  such  superstitious  persons,  "their  words  and 

*  The  English  translation  of  Plu-  skill   and   impose   upon   him   with 

tarch's  Morals  "by  several  hands,"  subtle    questions."      But    the    cor- 

first  published  in   1684- 1694,  sixth  responding    clause    in    the    Greek 

edition   corrected    and   revised   by  text  is  merely  ol  nh>  cos  aoinarov  bta- 

W.    W.    Goodwin,    5    vols.,    1870-  irtipav  \ayL0a.vovTt%,  and  there  seems 

1878,  IV,  10,  renders  a  passage  in  to   be   no    reason    for    taking    the 

the  seventh  chapter  of  De  defectU'  word  "sophist"  in  any  other  than 

oraculorunt,    in    which    complaint  its   usual   meaning.     The  passage 

is  made  of  the  "base  and  villain-  therefore  cannot  be  interpreted  as 

ous  questions"  which  are  now  put  an  attack  upon  even  vulgar  astrol- 

to   the   oracle   of   Apollo,   as    fol-  ogers. 

lows :  "some  coming  to  him  as  a         '  De  defectu  oraculorunt,  13. 
mere  paltry  astrologer  to  try  his 


2IH  MAGIC  AXD  EXPERIMEXTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

motions,  their  sorceries  and  magics,  their  runnings  to  and 
fro  and  beatings  of  drums,  their  impure  rites  and  their 
purifications,  their  filthiness  and  chastity-,  their  barbarian 
and  illegal  chastisements  and  abuse."  ^  Plutarch  seems  to 
be  in  part  animated  by  the  common  prejudice  against  all 
other  religions  than  cHie's  own.  and  speaks  twice  with  dis- 
taste of  Jewish  Sabbaths.  He  also,  however,  as  the  passage 
just  quoted  shows,  is  opposed  to  the  more  extreme  and  de- 
basing forms  of  magic,  and  declares  that  the  superstitious 
man  becomes  a  mere  peg  or  post  upon  which  all  the  old- 
wives  hang  any  amulets  and  ligatures  upon  which  they  may 
chance.-  He  further  condemns  such  historic  instances  of 
superstition  as  Xicias's  suspension  of  military  operations 
during  a  lunar  eclipse  on  the  Sicilian  expedition.^  There  was 
nothing  terrible,  says  Plutarch,  with  his  usual  felicity  of  an- 
tithesis, in  the  periodic  reoirrence  of  the  earth's  shadow 
upon  the  moon;  but  it  was  a  terrible  calamitv*  that  the 
shadow  of  superstition  should  thus  darken  the  mind  of  a 
general  at  the  very  moment  when  a  great  crisis  required  the 
fullest  use  of  his  reason. 
-:"tarch  In  the  essay  upon  the  demon  of  Socrates  one  of  the 

^;l"^"'*^  speakers,  attacking  faith  in  dreams  and  apparitions,  com- 
mends Socrates  as  one  who  did  not  reject  the  worship  of 
the  gods  but  who  did  purify  philosophy,  which  he  had  re- 
ceived from  P}-thagoras  and  Empedocles  full  of  phantasms 
and  myths  and  the  dread  of  demons,  and  reeling  like  a  Bac- 
chanal, and  reduced  it  to  facts  and  reason  and  truth.*  An- 
other of  the  company,  however,  objects  that  the  demon  of 
Socrates  outdid  the  divination  of  P\thagoras.^  These  con- 
flicting opinions  may  be  applied  in  some  measiu-e  to  Plutarch 
himself.  His  censtu"e  of  dread  of  demons  and  excessive 
superstition  is  not  to  be  taken  as  a  sign  of  scepticism  on 
his  part  in  oracles,  dreams,  or  the  demons  themselves.  To 
these  matters  we  next  tturu 

'Cap.  12.  *Cap.  9. 

•Cap.  7. 

•  Cap.  a  *  Cap.   10. 


pe-fu: 


VI 


PLUTARCH'S  ESSAYS  20= 


Plutarch's  faith  and  interest  in  oracles  in  general  and  The 

,  .  .      ,  ,    oracles  of 

in  the  Delphian  oracle  ot  Apollo  in  particular  are  attested  Delphi  and 

by  three  of  his  essays,  the  De  defectu  oraculorum,  De  Py-  '^X^^^ 
thme  oracuUs  and  De  Ei  apud  Delphos.  At  the  same  time 
these  essays  attest  the  decline  of  the  oracles  from  their  earlier 
popularity"  and  greatness.  The  oracular  cave  of  Trophonius, 
of  which  we  shall  hear  again  in  the  Life  of  Apollonius  of 
Tyana,  also  comes  into  Plutarch's  works,  and  the  prophetic 
and  apocal}'ptic  vision  is  described  of  a  youth  who  spent  two 
nights  and  a  day  there  in  an  endeavor  to  learn  the  nature 
of  the  demon  of  Socrates.^ 

Plutarch  further  had  faith  in  divination  in  general,  Divination 
whether  by  dreams,  sneezes  or  other  omens:  but  he  attempted 
to  give  a  dignified  philosophical  and  theological  explana- 
tion of  it.  Few  men  receive  direct  divine  revelation,  in  his 
opinion,  but  to  many  signs  are  given  on  which  divination 
may  be  based.-  He  held  that  the  human  soul  had  a  natural 
faculty  of  di%-ination  which  might  be  exercised  at  favorable 
times  and  when  the  bodily  state  was  not  unfavorable.^  A 
speaker  in  one  of  his  dialogues  justifies  divination  even  from 
sneezes  and  like  trivial  occurrences  upon  the  ground  that  as 
the  faint  beat  of  the  pulse  has  meaning  for  the  ph}*sician  and 
a  small  cloud  in  the  sk}-  is  for  a  skilful  pilot  a  sign  of  im- 
pending storm,  so  the  least  thing  may  be  a  clue  to  the  truly- 
prophetic  soul.^  The  extent  of  Plutarch's  faith  in  dreams 
may  be  inferred  from  his  discussion  of  the  problem.  Why 
are  dreams  in  autumn  the  least  reliable  ?  ^  First  there  is 
Aristotle's  suggestion  that  eating  autumn  fruit  so  disturbs 
the  digestion  that  the  soul  is  left  little  opportunity  to  ex- 
ercise its  prophetic  faculty-  undistracted.  If  we  accept  the 
doctrine  of  Democritus  that  dreams  are  caused  by  images 
from  other  bodies  and  even  minds  or  souls,  which  enter  the 
body  of  the  sleeper  through  the  open  pores  and  affect  the 
mind,  revealing  to  it  the  present  passions  and  future  de- 

^  De   genio   Socratis,  21-22.  *  De  genio  Socratis,  12, 

'Ibid..  24. 

*  De  dcfcctu  orjcuhrum,  40.  *  Sympos.   \TII.    10. 


206 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Demons  as 
mediators 
between 
gods  and 
fnen. 


Demons  in 
the  moon : 
migration 
of  the  soul. 


signs  of  others, — if  we  accept  this  theory,  it  may  be  that 
the  falling  leaves  in  autumn  disturb  the  air  and  ruffle  these 
extremely  thin  and  film-like  emanations.  A  third  explana- 
tion offered  is  that  in  the  declining  months  of  the  year  all 
our  faculties,  including  that  of  natural  divination,  are  in  a 
state  of  decline.  In  the  case  of  oracles  like  that  at  Delphi  it 
is  suggested  that  the  Pythia's  natural  faculty  of  divination 
is  stimulated  by  "the  prophetical  exhalations  from  the  earth" 
which  induce  a  bodily  state  favorable  to  divination.^  The 
god  or  demon,  however,  is  the  underlying  and  directing 
cause  of  the  oracle.- 

To  the  demons  and  their  relations  to  the  gods  and  to 
men  we  therefore  next  come.  Plutarch's  view  is  that  they 
are  essential  mediators  between  the  gods  and  men.  Just  as 
one  who  should  remove  the  air  from  between  the  earth  and 
moon  would  destroy  the  continuity  of  the  universe,  so  those 
who  deny  that  there  is  a  race  of  demons  break  ofif  all  inter- 
course between  gods  and  men.^  On  the  other  hand,  the 
theory  of  demons  solves  many  doubts  and  difficulties.-'* 
When  and  where  this  doctrine  originated  is  uncertain, 
whether  among  the  magi  about  Zoroaster,  or  in  Thrace  with 
Orpheus,  or  in  Egypt  or  Phrygia.  Plutarch  likens  the  gods 
to  an  equilateral,  the  demons  to  an  isosceles,  and  human  be- 
ings to  a  scalene  triangle;  and  again  compares  the  gods  to 
sun  and  stars,  the  demons  to  the  moon,  and  men  to  comets 
and  meteors.^  In  the  youth's  vision  in  the  cave  of  Tro- 
phonius  the  moon  appeared  to  belong  to  earthly  demons, 
while  those  stars  which  have  a  regular  motion  were  the 
demons  of  sages,  and  the  wandering  and  falling  stars  the 
demons  of  men  who  have  yielded  to  irrational  passions.® 

These  suggestions  that  the  moon  and  the  air  between 
earth  and  moon  are  the  abode  of  the  demons  and  this  remi- 
niscence of  the  Platonic  doctrine  of  the  soul  and  its  migra- 
tions receive  further  confirmation  in  a  discussion  whether 


^  De   defectu    oraculorum,   44. 
^bid.,  48. 
Ubid.,    13. 


*Ibid.,  ID. 
^bid.,  13. 
*£?<?  genio  Socratis,  22. 


VI  PLUTARCH'S  ESSAYS  207 

the  moon  is  inhabited  in  the  essay,  On  the  Face  in  the  Moon. 
A  story  is  there  told  ^  of  a  man  who  visited  islands  five 
days'  sail  west  of  Britain,  where  Saturn  is  imprisoned  and 
where  there  are  demons  serving  him.  This  man  who  ac- 
quired great  skill  in  astrology  during  his  stay  there  stated 
upon  his  return  to  Europe  that  every  soul  after  leaving  the 
human  body  wanders  for  a  time  between  earth  and  moon, 
but  finally  reaches  the  latter  planet,  where  the  Elysian  fields 
are  located,  and  there  becomes  a  demon. ^  The  demons  do 
not  always  remain  in  the  moon,  however,  but  may  come  to 
earth  to  care  for  oracles  or  be  imprisoned  in  a  human  body 
again  for  some  crime.^  The  man  who  repeats  the  stranger's 
story  leaves  it  to  his  hearers,  however,  to  believe  it  or  not. 
But  the  struggle  upward  of  human  souls  to  the  estate  of 
demons  is  again  described  in  the  essay  on  the  demon  of  Soc- 
rates,^ where  it  is  explained  that  those  souls  which  have  suc- 
ceeded in  freeing  themselves  from  all  union  with  the  flesh 
become  guardian  demons  and  help  those  of  their  fellows 
whom  they  can  reach,  just  as  men  on  shore  wade  out  as  far 
as  they  can  into  the  waves  to  rescue  those  sea-tossed,  ship- 
v/recked  mariners  who  have  succeeded  in  struggling  almost 
to  land.  The  soul  is  plunged  into  the  body,  the  uncorrupted 
mind  or  demon  remains  without.^ 

The  demons  differ  from  the  gods  in  that  they  are  mortal,  Demons 

though  much  longer-lived  than  men.    Hesiod  said  that  crows  ^°^^^^  '■ ., 

some  evil. 

live  nine  times  as  long  as  men,  stags  four  times  as  long  as 
crows,  ravens  three  times  as  long  as  stags,  a  phoenix  nine 
times  as  long  as  a  raven,  and  the  nymphs  ten  times  as  long  as 
the  phoenix.^  There  are  storms  in  the  isles  off  Britain  when- 
ever one  of  the  demons  residing  there  dies."^  Some  demons 
are  good  spirits  and  others  are  evil ;  some  are  more  passive 
and  irrational  than  others ;  some  delight  in  gloomy  festivals, 
foul  words,  and  even  human  sacrifice.^ 

^Cap.  26.  «Cap.  22. 

Cap.  29.  "  ]jg  defectu  oraculorum,   10. 

Cap.  30.  '  ii,id.,   18. 

Cap.  24.  Ubid.,   13-14. 


208 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


Men  and 
demons. 


Relation  of 
Plutarch's 
to  other 
concep- 
tions of 
demons. 


Once  a  year  in  the  neighborhood  of  the  Red  Sea  a  man 
is  seen  who  spends  the  remainder  of  his  time  among 
"nymphs,  nomads  and  demons."  ^  At  his  annual  appear- 
ance many  princes  and  great  men  come  to  consult  him  con- 
cerning the  future.  He  also  has  the  gift  of  tongues  to  the 
extent  of  understanding  several  languages  perfectly.  His 
speech  is  like  sweetest  music,  his  breath  sweet  and  fragrant, 
his  person  the  most  graceful  that  his  interlocutor  had  ever 
seen.  He  also  was  never  afflicted  with  any  disease,  for  once 
a  month  he  ate  the  bitter  fruit  of  a  medicinal  herb.  As  to 
the  exact  nature  of  Socrates'  demon  there  is  some  diversity 
of  opinion.  One  man  suggests  that  it  was  merely  the  sneez- 
ing of  himself  or  others,  sneezes  on  the  left  hand  warning 
him  to  desist  from  his  intended  course  of  action,  while  a 
sneeze  in  any  other  quarter  was  interpreted  by  him  as  a  fa- 
vorable sign.^  The  weight  of  opinion,  however,  inclines  to- 
wards the  view  that  his  demon  did  not  appear  to  him  as  an 
apparition  or  phantasm,  or  even  communicate  with  him  as  an 
audible  voice,  but  by  immediate  impression  upon  his  mind.^ 

Plutarch's  account  of  demons  is  the  first  of  a  number 
which  we  shall  have  occasion  to  note.  As  the  discussion  of 
them  by  Apuleius  in  the  next  chapter  and  the  rather  crude 
representation  of  them  given  in  Philostratus's  Life  of  Apol- 
lonius  of  Tyana  will  show,  there  was  as  yet  among  non- 
Christian  writers  no  unanimity  of  opinion  concerning  de- 
mons. On  the  other  hand  there  are  several  conceptions  in 
Plutarch's  essays  which  were  to  be  continued  later  by  Chris- 
tians and  Neo-Platonists :  namely,  the  conception  of  a  medi- 
ate class  of  beings  between  God  and  men,  the  hypothesis  of 
a  world  of  spirits  in  close  touch  with  human  life,  the  associa- 
tion of  divination  and  oracles  with  demons,  and  the  location 
of  spirits  in  the  sphere  of  the  moon  or  the  air  between  earth 
and  moon, — although  Plutarch  sometimes  connected  demons 
with  the  stars  above  the  moon.  This  occasional  association 
of  stars  with  spirits  and  of  sinning  souls  with  falling  stars 

^  De  defectu  oraculorum,  21.  ^  Ibid.,  20. 

*De  genio  Socratis,  11. 


VI  PLUTARCH'S  ESSAYS  209 

bears  some  resemblance  to  the  depiction  of  certain  stars  as 
sinners  in  the  Hebraic  Book  of  Enoch,  which  was  written 
before  Plutarch's  time  and  which  we  shall  consider  in  our 
next  book  as  an  influence  upon  the  development  of  early 
Christian  thought. 

As  for  the  stars  apart  from  demons,  Plutarch  discusses  The 
the  art  of  astrology  as  little  as  he  does  "magic"  by  that  name.  Tarrutms^. 
Mentions  of  individuals  as  skilled  in  "astrology"  may  sim- 
ply mean  that  they  were  trained  astronomers.  When  a 
veritable  astrologer  in  our  sense  of  the  word  is  mentioned 
in  one  of  Plutarch's  Lives,^  he  is  described  as  a  fJLadrmaTiKos 
— a  word  often  used  for  a  caster  of  horoscopes  and  pre- 
dicter  of  the  future.  Here,  however,  it  carries  no  reproach 
of  charlatanism,  since  in  the  same  phrase  he  is  called  a 
philosopher.  This  Tarrutius  was  a  friend  of  Varro,  who 
asked  him  to  work  out  the  horoscope  of  Romulus  backward 
from  what  was  known  of  the  later  life  and  character 
of  the  founder  of  Rome.  "For  it  was  possible  for  the 
same  science  which  predicted  man's  life  from  the  time  of 
his  birth  to  infer  the  time  of  his  birth  from  the  events 
of  his  life."  Tarrutius  set  to  work  and  from  the  data  at 
his  disposal  figured  out  that  Romulus  was  conceived  in  the 
first  year  of  the  second  Olympiad,  on  the  twenty-third  day 
of  the  Egyptian  month  Khoeak  at  the  third  hour  when  there 
was  a  total  eclipse  of  the  sun;  and  that  he  was  born  on 
the  twenty-first  day  of  the  month  Thoth  about  sunrise.  He 
further  estimated  that  Rome  was  founded  by  him  on  the 
ninth  day  of  the  month  Pharmuthi  between  the  second  and 
third  hour.  For,  adds  Plutarch,  they  think  that  the  for- 
tunes of  cities  are  also  controlled  by  the  hour  of  their 
genesis.  Plutarch,  however,  seems  to  look  upon  such  doc- 
trines as  rather  strange  and  fabulous.^  Varro,  on  the  other 
hand,  may  have  regarded  it  as  the  most  scientific  method 
possible  of  settling  disputed  questions  of  historical  chro- 
nology. 

Romulus,  cap.  12.  Slo.  to  fivdwdes  ti'ox^'fi<^et  rovs  bTvyx&vov- 

AXXd  ravra  ixlv  ictojs  Kal  to.  roiavra.       ras  avrol^. 
Tcjj^eftf)  Kal  irtpiTTU)  irpocra^eTai  /LxdXXo;' i) 


210  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

The  A  favorable  attitude  towards  astrology  is  found  mainly 

^  ^^^°'  in  those  essays  by  Plutarch  which  are  suspected  of  being 
spurious,  the  De  fato  and  De  placitis  philosophorum.  Of 
the  latter  we  have  already  treated  under  Galen.  In  the 
former  fate  is  described  as  "the  soul  of  the  universe,"  and 
the  three  main  divisions  of  the  universe,  namely,  the  im- 
movable heaven,  the  moving  spheres  and  heavenly  bodies, 
and  the  region  about  the  earth,  are  associated  with  the 
three  Fates,  Clotho,  Atropos,  and  Lachesis.^  It  is  similarly 
stated  in  the  essay  on  the  demon  of  Socrates  ^  that  of  the 
four  principles  of  all  things,  life,  motion,  genesis  or  genera- 
tion, and  corruption,  the  first  two  are  joined  by  the  One 
indivisibly,  the  second  and  third  Mind  unites  through  the 
sun;  the  third  and  fourth  Nature  joins  through  the  moon. 
And  over  each  of  these  three  bonds  presides  one  of  the  three 
Fates,  Atropos,  Clotho,  and  Lachesis.  In  other  words,  the 
one  God  or  first  cause,  invisible  and  unmoved,  in  whom  is 
life,  sets  in  motion  the  heavenly  spheres  and  bodies,  through 
whose  instrumentality  generation  and  corruption  upon 
earth  are  produced  and  regulated, — which  is  substantially 
the  Aristotelian  view  of  the  universe.  Returning  to  the 
De  fato  we  may  note  that  it  repeats  the  Stoic  theory  of 
the  magnus  anntis  when  the  heavenly  bodies  resume  their 
rounds  and  all  history  repeats  itself.^  Despite  this  ap- 
parent admission  that  human  life  is  subject  to  the  move- 
ments of  the  stars,  the  author  of  the  De  fato  seer^  to  think 
that  accident,  fortune  or  chance,  the  contingent,  and  "what 
is  in  us"  or  free-will,  can  all  co-exist  with  fate,  which  he 
practically  identifies  with  the  motion  of  the  heavenly  bodies,* 
Fate  is  also  comprehended  by  divine  Providence  but  this 
fact  does  not  militate  against  astrology,  since  Providence 
itself  divides  into  that  of  the  first  God,  that  of  the  secondary 
gods  or  stars  "who  move  through  the  heavens  regulating 
mortal  affairs,  and  that  of  the  demons  who  act  as  guardians 

of  men.^ 
*Cap.  2.  *Caps.  5-8. 

'  Cap.  22. 
"  Cap.  3.  Cap.  9 


VI 


PLUTARCH'S  ESSAYS  211 


One  or  two  bits  of  astrology  may  be  noted  in  Plutarch's  Other 
other  essays.  The  man  who  learned  "astrology"  among  astrobgy. 
demons  in  the  isle  beyond  Britain  affirmed  that  in  human 
generation  earth  supplies  the  body,  the  moon  furnishes  the 
soul,  and  the  sun  provides  the  intellect.^  In  the  Symposiacs  ^ 
the  opinion  of  the  mythographers  is  repeated  that  mon- 
strous animals  were  produced  during  the  war  with  the  giants 
because  the  moon  turned  from  its  course  then  and  rose 
in  unaccustomed  quarters.  Plutarch  was,  by  the  way,  in- 
clined to  distinguish  the  moon  from  other  heavenly  bodies 
as  passive  and  imperfect,  a  sort  of  celestial  earth  or  terres- 
trial star.  Such  a  separation  of  the  moon  from  the  other 
stars  and  planets  would  have,  however,  no  necessary  con- 
trariety with  astrological  theory,  which  usually  ascribed  a 
peculiar  place  to  the  moon  and  represented  it  as  the  medium 
through  which  the  more  distant  planets  exerted  their  effects 
upon  the  earth. 

Sometimes  Plutarch's  cosmology  carries  Platonism  to  Cosmic 
the  verge  of  Gnosticism,  a  subject  of  which  we  shall  treat 
in  a  later  chapter.  The  diviner  who  had  communed  with 
demons,  nomads,  and  nymphs  in  the  desert  asserted  that 
there  was  not  one  world,  but  one  hundred  and  eighty-three 
worlds  arranged  in  the  form  of  a  triangle  with  sixty  to  each 
side  and  one  at  each  angle.  Within  this  triangle  of  worlds 
lay  the  plain  of  truth  where  were  the  ideas  and  models  of 
all  things  that  had  been  or  were  to  be,  and  about  these  was 
eternity  from  which  time  flowed  off  like  a  river  to  the  one 
hundred  and  eighty-three  worlds.  The  vision  delectable  of 
those  ideas  is  granted  to  men  only  once  in  a  myriad  of 
years,  if  they  live  well,  and  is  the  goal  toward  which  all 
philosophy  strives.  The  stranger,  we  are  informed,  told 
this  tale  artlessly,  like  one  in  the  mysteries,  and  produced  no 
demonstration  or  proof  of  what  he  said.  We  have  already 
heard  Plutarch  liken  gods,  demons,  and  men  to  different 
kinds  of  triangles;  he  also  repeats  Plato's  association  of  the 

^De  facie  in  orbe  lunae,  28.  ''VIII,  9. 


212 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Number 
mysticism. 


Occult 
virtues  in 
nature. 


five  regular  solids  with  the  elements,  earth,  air,  fire,  water, 
and  ether.^  He  states  that  the  nature  of  fire  is  quite  apparent 
in  the  pyramid  from  "the  slenderness  of  its  decreasing  sides 
and  the  sharpness  of  its  angles,"  ^  and  that  fire  is  engendered 
from  air  when  the  octahedron  is  dissolved  into  pyramids,  and 
air  produced  from  fire  when  the  pyramids  are  compressed 
into  an  octahedron.^ 

These  geometrical  fancies  are  naturally  accompanied  by 
considerable  number  mysticism.  In  this  particular  passage 
the  merits  of  the  number  five  are  enlarged  upon  and  a  long 
list  is  given  of  things  that  are  five  in  number.!"*  Five  is  again 
extolled  in  the  essay  on  The  Ei  at  Delphi,^  but  there  one  of 
the  company  remarks  with  much  reason  that  it  is  possible 
to  praise  any  number  in  many  ways,  but  that  he  prefers  to 
five  "the  sacred  seven  of  Apollo."  ®  Platonic  geometrical 
reveries  and  Pythagorean  number  mysticism  are  indulged 
in  even  more  extensively  in  the  essay  On  the  Procreation 
of  the  Soul  in  Timaeus.  The  number  and  proportion  exist- 
ing in  planets,  stars  and  spheres  are  touched  on,'^  and  it  is 
stated  that  the  divine  demiurge  produced  the  marvelous  vir- 
tues of  drugs  and  organs  by  employing  harmonies  and  num- 
bers.^ Thus  in  the  potency  of  ntmiber  and  numerical  rela- 
tions is  suggested  a  possible  explanation  of  astrology^and 
magic  force  in  nature. 

Plutarch,  indeed,  shows  the  same  faith  in  the  existence 
of  occult  virtues  in  natural  objects  and  in  what  may  be 
called  natural  magic  as  most  of  his  contemporaries.  At  his 
symposium  when  one  man  avers  that  he  saw  the  tiny  fish 
echene'is  stop  the  ship  upon  which  he  was  sailing  until  the 
look-out  man  picked  it  off,^  some  laugh  at  his  credulity  but 


^  De  defectu  oraculorum,  31-32. 
The  resemblance  of  the  stranger's 
tale  to  the  vision  of  Er  in  Plato's 
Republic  is  also  evident. 

^Ibid.,  34. 

"Ibid.,  37. 

*  Ibid.,  36;   and   see   11-12. 

*  Caps.  8-16. 
*Cap.  17. 
'Cap.  31. 


•Cap.  33. 

'  Symposiacs,  II,  7.  D'Arcy  W. 
Thompson  in  his  translation  of 
Aristotle's  History  of  Animals 
comments  on  II,  14,  "The  myth  of 
the  'ship-holder'  has  been  ele- 
gantly explained  by  V.  W.  Elk- 
man,  'On  Dead  Water,'  in  the  Re- 
ports of  Nansen's  North  Polar 
Expedition,  Christiania,  1904." 


VI  PLUTARCH'S  ESSAYS  213 

others  narrate  other  cases  of  strange  antipathies  in  nature. 
Mad  elephants  are  quieted  by  the  sight  of  a  ram;  vipers  will 
not  move  if  touched  with  a  leaf  from  a  beech  tree;  wild  bulls 
become  tame  when  tied  to  a  fig  tree;^  if  light  objects  are 
oiled,  amber  fails  to  attract  them  as  usual;  and  iron  rubbed 
with  garlic  does  not  respond  to  the  magnet,  "These  things 
are  proved  by  experience  but  it  is  difficult  if  not  quite  impos- 
sible to  learn  their  cause."  At  the  Symposium  ^  the  ques- 
tion also  is  raised  why  salt  is  called  divine,  and  it  is  sug- 
gested that  it  may  be  because  it  preserves  bodies  from  decay 
after  the  soul  has  left  them,  or  because  mice  conceive  with- 
out sexual  intercourse  by  merely  licking  salt.  In  The  Delay 
of  the  Deity  Plutarch  again  treats  of  occult  virtues.^  They 
pass  from  body  to  body  with  incredible  swiftness  or  to  an 
incredible  distance.  He  wonders  why  it  is  that  if  a  goat 
takes  a  piece  of  sea-holly  in  her  mouth,  the  entire  herd  will 
stand  still  until  the  goatherd  removes  it.  We  see  once  more 
how  closely  such  notions  are  associated  with  magical  prac- 
tices, when  in  the  same  paragraph  he  mentions  the  custom 
of  making  the  children  of  those  who  have  died  of  con- 
sumption or  dropsy  sit  soaking  their  feet  in  water  until  the 
corpse  has  been  buried  so  that  they  may  not  catch  their 
parent's  disease. 

On  the  other  hand,  how  difficult  it  must  have  been  with  Asbestos. 
the  limited  scientific  knowledge  of  that  time  to  distinguish 
true  from  false  marvelous  properties  may  be  inferred  from 
Plutarch's  description  ^  of  a  certain  soft  and  pliable  stone 
that  used  to  be  produced  at  Carystus  and  from  which  hand- 
kerchiefs and  hair-nets  were  made  which  could  not  be  burnt 
and  were  cleaned  by  exposure  to  fire, — a  description,  it  would 
seem,  of  our  asbestos,  although  Plutarch  does  not  give  the 
stone  any  name.  Strabo  also  ascribes  similar  properties  to 
a  stone  from  Carystus  without  naming  it.^    Dioscorides  and 

^  See  above  p.  77  for  the  some-  *X,  i    (Casaub.,  446)  ;   for  this 

what  diflferent  statement  of  Pliny  and    some    other    source    citations 

(NH,  XXIII,  64).  and  a  brief  bibliography  of  mod- 

' Symposiacs,  V,  10.  ern  discussions  on  the  subject  see 

^De   sera   numinis   vindicta,    14.  the    article,    "Amiantus"     (3)     in 

*  De  defectu  oraculorum,  43.  Pauly-Wissowa. 


214  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

other  Greek  authors,  we  are  told/  apply  the  word  "asbestos" 
to  quick-lime,  but  Pliny  in  the  Natural  History  ^  describes 
what  he  says  the  Greeks  call  aa^eaTLvou  much  as  Plutarch 
does.  He  adds  that  it  is  employed  in  making  shrouds  for 
royal  funerals  to  separate  the  ashes  of  the  corpse  from  those 
of  the  pyre.^  But  he  seems  to  regard  it  as  a  plant,  not  a 
stone,  listing  it  as  a  variety  of  linen  in  one  of  his  books  on 
vegetation.  He  also  states  incorrectly  that  it  is  found  but 
rarely  and  in  desert  and  arid  regions  of  India  where  there 
is  no  rain  and  a  hot  sun  and  amid  terrible  serpents.*  Prob- 
ably Pliny  or  his  source  argued  that  anything  which  resisted 
the  action  of  fire  must  have  been  inured  by  growth  under 
fiery  suns  and  among  serpents.  Furthermore  it  obviously 
should  possess  other  marvelous  properties,  so  we  are  not 
surprised  to  find  Anaxilaus  cited  to  the  effect  that  if  this 
"linen"  is  tied  around  a  tree  trunk,  the  blows  with  which 
the  tree  is  felled  cannot  be  heard.  It  was  thus  that  imagina- 
tions inured  to  magic  enlarged  upon  unusual  natural  prop- 
erties. 

*  Article   on    "Asbestos"   in   the  length.    It  is  still  preserved  in  the 

Encyclopedia  Britannica,  nth  edi-  Vatican,"     (Bostock     and     Riley, 

tion,    which    further    states    that  note  45). 

Charlemagne  was   said  to   own  a  *  "On  the  contrary,  it  is  found  in 

tablecloth   which    was   cleaned   by  the  Higher  Alps  in  the  vicinity  of 

throwing  it  into  the  fire,  and  that  glaciers,      in      Scotland,     and     in 

in    1676   a    merchant    from    China  Siberia  even"  (Bostock  and  Riley, 

exhibited  to  the  Royal   Society  a  note  46).    The  article  on  "Amian- 

handkerchief      of      "salamander's  tus  (3)"  in  Pauly-Wissowa  incor- 

wool"   or  linum  asbesti    (asbestos  rectly    assumes    that    in    XIX,    4, 

linen).     See  also   Marco    Polo,   I,  Pliny  has  it  in  mind.    In  XXXVI, 

42,    and    Cordier's    note    in    Yule  31,     however,     Pliny    briefly     de- 

(1903),  I,  216.  scribes  the  stone  amianthus,  which 

^XIX,  4.  In  Bostock  and  Riley's  Bostock  and  Riley   (note  52)   call 

English  translation,  note  44  states  "the     most     delicate     variety     of 

that    "the    wicks    of    the    inextin-  asbestus,"    as    "losing    nothing    in 

guishable    lamps    of    the    middle  fire"  and  "resisting  all  potions  (or, 

ages,  the  existence  of  which  was  spells)  even  of  the  magi," — "Ami- 

an  article  of  general  belief,  were  antus    alumini    similis    nihil    igni 

said  to  be  made  of  asbestus."    On  deperdit.     Hie     veneficis     resistit 

its    use    in    lamp-wicks     see    also  omnibus  privatim  magorum."     In 

Pausanias,  I,  26,  7.  XXXVII,    54,    in    an    alphabetical 

'  "In    the    year    1702    there    was  list  of  stones,  he  briefly  states  that 

found  near   the    Naevian    Gate  at  asbestos  is  iron-colored  and  found 

Rome    a    funeral    urn,    in    which  in    the    mountains    of    Arcadia, — 

there  was  a  skull,  calcined  bones,  "Asbestos    in    Arcadiae    montibus 

and    other    ashes,    enclosed    in    a  nascitur  coloris  ferrei." 
cloth  of  asbestus  of  a  marvelous 


VI 


PLUTARCH'S  ESSAYS  215 


A  treatise  upon  rivers  and  mountains  in  which  the  mar-  On  rivers 
velous  virtues  of  herbs  and  stones  figure  very  prominently  °^i„J"^""" 
has  sometimes  been  included  among  the  works  of  Plutarch, 
but  also  has  been  omitted  entirely  from  some  editions.^ 
Some  have  ascribed  it  to  Parthenius  of  the  time  of  Nero. 
It  is  made  up  of  some  thirty-five  chapters  in  each  of  which 
a  river  and  a  mountain  are  mentioned.  Usually  some  myth 
or  tragic  history  is  recounted,  from  which  the  river  took  its 
name  or  with  which  it  was  otherwise  intimately  connected. 
A  similar  procedure  is  followed  in  the  case  of  the  mountain. 
The  writer,  whoever  he  may  be,  makes  a  show  of  extensive 
reading,  citing  over  forty  authorities,  most  of  whom  are 
Greek  and  not  mentioned  in  the  full  bibliographies  of 
Pliny's  Natural  History.  The  titles  cited  have  to  do  largely 
with  stones,  rivers,  and  different  countries.  It  has  been 
questioned,  however,  whether  these  citations  are  not  bogus. ^ 

The  properties  attributed  to  herbs  and  stones  in  this  Magic 
treatise  are  to  a  large  extent  magical.  A  white  reed  found  ^^  ^' 
in  the  river  Phasis  while  one  is  sacrificing  at  dawn  to  Hecate, 
if  strewn  in  a  wife's  bedroom,  drives  mad  any  adulterer  who 
enters  and  makes  him  confess  his  sin.^  Another  herb  men- 
tioned in  the  same  chapter  was  used  by  Medea  to  protect 
Jason  from  her  father.  In  a  later  chapter  *  we  are  told  how 
Hera  called  upon  Selene  to  aid  her  in  securing  her  revenge 
upon  Heracles,  and  how  the  moon  goddess  filled  a  large 
chest  with  froth  and  foam  by  her  magic  spells  until  presently 
a  huge  lion  leaped  out  of  the  chest.  Returning  from  such 
sorceresses  as  Hecate,  Medea,  and  Selene  to  herbs  alone,  in 
other  rivers  are  plants  which  test  the  purity  of  gold,  aid 
dim  sight  or  blind  one,  wither  at  the  mention  of  the  word 
"step-mother"  or  burst  into  flames  whenever  a  step-mother 
has  evil  designs  against  her  step-son,  free  their  bearers  from 
fear  of  apparitions,  operate  as  charms  in  love-making  and 

*  Ed.    by    R.    Hercher,    Lipsiae,  and     Mountains     itself     called     a 

185 1 ;      and     by     C.      Miiller     in  "Schwindelbuch,"    but    these    cita- 

Geograph.      Graeci    Minorcs,    II,  tions  are  rejected  as  fraudulent. 

637flf.  'Cap.  5. 

'  In    Christ's    Gesch.   d.   Griech.  *  Cap.   18. 
Litt.,  not  only  is   the   On  Rivers 


2i6  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

childbirth,   cure   madmen   of   their   frenzy,   check   quartan 

agues  if  appHed  to  the  breasts,  protect  virginity  or  wither 

at  a  virgin's  touch,  turn  wine  into  water  except  that  it  retains 

its  bouquet,  or  preserve  persons  anointed  with  their  juice 

from  sickness  to  their  dying  day. 

Stones  An  easy  transition  from  the  theme  of  magic  herbs  to 

found  in  .-.,,,  .  ,  .  , 

plants  that  oi  stones  is  afforded  by  a  sort  of  poppy  which  grows 

and  sh.  -^^  ^  river  of  Mysia  and  bears  black,  harp-shaped  stones  which 
the  natives  gather  and  scatter  over  their  ploughed  fields.^ 
If  these  stones  then  lie  still  where  they  have  fallen,  it  is 
taken  as  a  sign  of  a  barren  year;  but  if  they  fly  away  like 
locusts,  this  prognosticates  a  plentiful  harvest.  Other  mar- 
velous stones  are  found  in  the  head  of  a  fish  in  the  river 
Arar,  a  tributary  of  the  Rhone.  The  fish  is  itself  quite 
wonderful  since  it  is  white  while  the  moon  waxes  and 
black  when  it  wanes. ^  Presumably  for  this  reason  the  stone 
cures  quartan  agues,  if  applied  to  the  left  side  of  the  body 
while  the  moon  is  waning.  There  is  another  stone  which 
must  be  sought  after  under  a  waxing  moon  with  pipers 
playing  continually.^ 
Virtues  of  Other  stones  guard  treasuries  by  sounding  a  trumpet- 
stones,  like  alarm  at  the  approach  of  thieves;  or  change  color  four 
times  a  day  and  are  ordinarily  visible  only  to  young  girls. 
But  if  a  virgin  of  marriageable  age  chances  to  see  this  stone, 
she  is  safe  from  attempts  upon  her  chastity  henceforth.* 
Some  stones  drive  men  mad  and  are  connected  with  the 
Mother  of  the  Gods  or  are  found  only  during  the  celebration 
of  the  mysteries.^  Others  stop  dogs  from  barking,  expel 
demons,  grow  black  in  the  hands  of  false  witnesses,  protect 
from  wild  beasts,  and  have  varied  medicinal  powers  or  other 
effects  similar  to  those  already  mentioned  in  the  case  of 
herbs. °  In  a  river  where  the  Spartans  were  defeated  is  a 
stone  which  leaps  towards  the  bank,  if  it  hears  a  trumpet, 

*Cap.  21.  *Cap.  7. 

*  Cap.  6.  '  Caps.  9,  10,  12. 

•Cap.  I.  'Caps.   16,   18,  24. 


VI  PLUTARCH'S  ESSAYS  217 

but  sinks  at  the  mention  of  the  Athenians.^    Certainly  a  mar- 
velous stone,  capable  of  both  hearing  and  motion ! 

Leaving  the  treatise  on  rivers  and  mountains,  for  the  Fascina- 
occult  virtue  of  human  beings  we  may  turn  to  a  discus-  **°"' 
sion  of  fascination  in  the  Symposiacs.^  Some  of  the  com- 
pany ridiculed  the  idea,  but  their  host  asserted  that  a  myriad 
of  events  went  to  prove  it  and  that  if  you  reject  a  thing 
simply  because  you  cannot  give  a  reason  for  it,  you  "take 
away  the  marvelous  from  all  things."  He  pointed  out  that 
some  men  hurt  little  and  tender  children  by  looking  at  them, 
and  argued  that,  as  the  plumes  of  other  birds  are  ruined  when 
mixed  with  those  of  the  eagle,  so  men  may  injure  by  their 
touch  or  mere  glance.  Plutarch,  who  was  of  the  company, 
suggested  effluvia  or  emanations  from  the  body  as  a  possible 
explanation,  pointing  out  that  love  begins  with  glances,  that 
no  disease  is  more  contagious  than  sore  eyes,  and  that  gazing 
upon  the  curlew  cures  jaundice.  The  bird  appears  to  attract 
the  disease  to  itself,  and  averts  its  head  and  closes  its  eyes, 
not,  as  some  think,  because  it  is  jealous  of  the  remedy  sought 
from  it,  but  because  it  feels  wounded  as  if  from  a  blow. 
Others  of  the  company  contended  that  the  passions  and  affec- 
tions of  the  soul  may  have  a  powerful  effect  through  the 
eyes  and  glance  upon  other  persons,  and  argued  that  the 
sufferings  of  the  soul  strengthen  the  powers  of  the  body,  and 
that  the  same  counter-charms  are  efficacious  against  envy  as 
against  fascination.  The  emanations  which  Democritus  be- 
lieved that  envious  and  malicious  persons  sent  forth  are  also 
mentioned ;  fathers  have  fascinated  their  own  children,  and 
it  is  even  possible  that  one  might  injure  oneself  by  reflection 
of  one's  gaze.  It  is  suggested  that  young  children  may  some- 
times be  fascinated  in  this  manner  rather  than  by  the  glance 
of  others. 

Plutarch  devotes  two  essays  to  the  familiar  theme  of  the  Animal 
craftiness  and  sagacity  of  animals  and  the  remedies  used  by  ^n?*^^*^ 
them.     In  one  essay  ^  a  companion  of  Odysseus  refuses  to  remedies. 
*  Cap.  17.  9 ;  also  Quaest.  Nat.,  cap.  26,  "Why 

V,  7.  certain   brutes    seek   certain    rem- 

Bruta  animalia  rattone  uti,  cap.      edies." 


2l8 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Theories 

and 

queries 

about 

nature. 


allow  Circe  to  turn  him  back  from  a  pig  to  human  form. 
He  boasts  among  other  things  that  beasts  know  how  to  cure 
themselves.  Without  ever  having  been  taught  swine  when 
sick  run  to  rivers  to  search  for  craw-fish;  tortoises  physic 
themselves  with  origanum  after  eating  vipers;  and  Cretan 
goats  devour  dittany  to  extract  arrows  and  darts  which  have 
been  shot  into  their  bodies.  In  the  other  essay  ^  on  the 
cleverness  of  animals  we  find  many  familiar  stories  repeated, 
including  some  of  the  inevitable  excerpts  from  Juba  on  ele- 
phants. We  meet  again  the  dolphins  with  their  love  for 
mankind,-  the  bird  who  picks  the  crocodile's  teeth  and  warns 
him  of  the  ichneumon,^  the  fish  who  rescue  one  another  by 
biting  the  line  or  dragging  one  another  by  the  tail  out  of 
nets,^  the  trained  elephant  who  was  slow  to  learn  and  was 
beaten  for  it  and  was  afterwards  seen  practicing  his  exer- 
cises by  himself  in  the  moonlight,^  the  sentinel  cranes  who 
stand  on  one  foot  and  hold  a  stone  in  the  other  to  awaken 
them  if  they  let  it  drop.®  More  novel  perhaps  is  the  story 
how  herons  open  oysters  by  first  swallowing  them,  shells 
and  all,  until  they  are  relaxed  by  the  internal  heat  of  the  bird, 
which  then  vomits  them  up  and  eats  them  out  of  the  shells. 
Or  the  account  of  the  tunny  fish  who  needs  no  astrological 
canons  and  is  familiar  with  arithmetic,  "Yes,  by  Zeus,  and 
with  optics,  too."  '^ 

Plutarch's  essays  bring  out  yet  other  interests  and  de- 
fects of  the  science  of  the  time.  One  on  The  Principle  of 
Cold  is  a  good  illustration  of  the  failings  of  the  ancient 
hypothesis  of  four  elements  and  four  qualities  and  of  the 
silly,  limited  arguing  which  usually  and  almost  of  necessity 
accompanied  it.  He  denies  that  cold  is  mere  privation  of 
heat,  since  it  seems  to  act  positively  upon  fluids  and  solids 
and  exists  in  different  degrees.  After  considering  various 
assertions  such  as  that  air  becomes  cold  when  it  becomes 


*  De  solertia  animaliunt.  "*  Cap.  25. 

'Ibid.,    36-37;    also    the  closing          ^  Cap.  12. 

chapters  of   The  Banquet  of  the          *  Cap.  10. 

Seven  Sages.  '  Cap.  29. 

•Cap.  31. 


VI  PLUTARCH'S  ESSAYS  219 

dark;  that  air  whitens  things  and  water  blackens  them; 
that  cold  objects  are  always  heavy;  he  finally  associates  the 
element  earth  especially  with  the  quality  cold.  In  another 
essay  ^  he  states  that  there  are  no  females  of  a  certain  type 
of  beetle  which  was  engraved  as  a  charm  upon  the  rings 
warriors  wore  to  battle,  but  that  the  males  begat  offspring 
by  rolling  up  balls  of  earth.  He  declares  that  "diseases  do 
not  have  distinct  germs"  in  a  discussion  in  the  Symposiacs 
whether  there  can  be  new  diseases.^  Other  natural  ques- 
tions discussed  in  the  treatise  of  that  name  and  the  Symposi- 
acs are :  Why  a  man  who  often  passes  near  dewy  trees  con- 
tracts leprosy  in  those  limbs  which  touch  the  wood?  Why 
the  Dorians  pray  for  bad  hay-making?  Why  bears'  paws 
are  the  sweetest  and  most  palatable  food?  Why  the  tracks 
of  wild  beasts  smell  worse  at  the  full  of  the  moon?  Why 
bees  are  more  apt  to  sting  fornicators  than  other  persons  ?  ^ 
Why  the  flesh  of  sheep  bitten  by  wolves  is  sweeter  than  that 
of  other  sheep?  Why  mushrooms  are  thought  to  be  pro- 
duced by  thunder?  Why  flesh  decays  sooner  in  moonlight 
than  sunlight?  Whether  Jews  abstain  from  pork  because 
they  worship  the  pig  or  because  they  have  an  antipathy 
towards  it  ?  ^ 

Plutarch  sometimes  shows  evidence  of  considerable  The 
astronomical  knowledge.  For  instance,  he  knows  that  the  ^"^'Po^es. 
mathematicians  figure  that  the  distance  from  sun  to  earth  is 
immense,  and  that  Aristarchus  demonstrated  the  sun  to  be 
eighteen  or  twenty  times  as  far  off  as  the  moon,  which  is 
distant  fifty-six  times  the  earth's  radius  at  the  lowest  esti- 
mate.*^ Yet  in  the  same  essay  ®  Plutarch  has  scoffed  at  the 
idea  of  a  spherical  earth  and  of  antipodes,  and  at  the  asser- 
tion that  bars  weighing  a  thousand  talents  would  stop  falling 
at  the  earth's  center,  if  a  hole  were  opened  up  through  the 
earth,  or  that  two  men  with  their  feet  in  opposite  directions 

^  Isis  and  Osiris,  10.  10;  IV,  5. 

VIII,  9,  l.bia.bkcrirkpu.aTa  v6<T(jivo\JK  s  r-i      j-      •      •  7       » 

«^^^^  De  facte  in  orbe  lunae,  9-10; 

'Nat.   Quaest.,  caps.   6,    14,   22,      ""}'?  5^^  °P^"/"&  chapters   of  De 
2A    ■xd  >       i-        >     ~t,       ,      dejectu  oraculorum. 

*  Symposiacs,  II,  9 ;  IV,  2 ;  III,  *  Cap.  7. 


220  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE  chap,  vi 

at  the  center  of  the  earth  might  nevertheless  both  be  right 
side  up,  or  that  one  man  whose  middle  was  at  the  center 
might  be  half  right  side  up  and  half  upside  down.  He 
admits,  however,  that  the  philosophers  think  so.  Thus  we 
see  that  Christian  fathers  like  Lactantius  were  not  the  first 
to  ridicule  the  notion  of  the  Antipodes;  apparently  as  well 
educated  and  omnivorous  a  pagan  reader  as  Plutarch  could 
do  the  same. 


CHAPTER  VII 

APULEIUS   OF    MADAURA 

I.     Life  and  Works 

Magic  and  the  man — Stylistic  reasons  for  regarding  the  Metamor- 
phoses as  his  first  work — Biographical  reasons — No  mention  of  the 
Metamorphoses  in  the  Apology. 

II.     Magic  in  the  Metamorphoses 

Powers  claimed  for  magic — Its  actual  performances — Its  limitations 
— The  crimes  of  witches — Male  magicians — Magic  as  an  art  and  dis- 
cipline— Materials  employed — Incantations  and  rites — Quacks  and 
charlatans — Various  superstitions — Bits  of  science  and  religion — Magic 
in  other  Greek  romances. 

III.     Magic  in  the  Apology 

Form  of  the  Apologia — Philosophy  and  magic — Magic  defined — 
Good  and  bad  magic — Magic  and  religion — Magic  and  science — Medical 
and  scientific  knowledge  of  Apuleius — He  repeats  familiar  errors — 
Apparent  ignorance  of  magic  and  occult  virtue — Despite  an  assumption 
of  knowledge — Attitude  toward  astronomy — His  theory  of  demons — 
Apuleius  in  the  middle  ages. 

I.     His  Life  and  Works 

One  of  the  fullest  and  most  vivid  pictures  of  magic  in  the  Magic  and 
ancient  Mediterranean  world  which  has  reached  us  is  pro-  ^^  "l^^  ^^ 
vided  by  the  writings  of  Apuleius.     He  lived  in  the  second  in  his 
century  of  our  era  and  was  not  merely  a  rhetorician  of  great 
note  in  his  day  and  the  writer  of  a  romance  which  has  ever 
since  fascinated  men,  but  also  a  Platonic  philosopher,  an 
initiate  into  many  religious  cults  and  mysteries,  and  a  stu- 
dent of  natural  science  and  medicine.     To  him  has  been 
ascribed   the  Latin  version   of  Asclepius,   a   supposititious 
dialogue  of  Hermes  Trismegistus.    No  author  perhaps  ever 
more    readily    and    complacently    talked    of    himself    than 

221 


222 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Stylistic 
reasons 
for  re- 
garding 
the  Meta- 
morphoses 
as  his 
first  work. 


Apuleius,  yet  it  is  no  easy  task  to  make  out  the  precise  facts 
of  his  life,  partly  because  in  his  romance,  The  Metamor- 
phoses, or  The  Golden  Ass,  he  has  hopelessly  confused 
himself  with  the  hero  Lucius  and  introduced  an  autobio- 
graphical element  of  uncertain  extent  into  what  is  in  the 
main  a  work  of  fiction;  partly  because  his  Apology,  or 
defense  when  tried  on  the  charge  of  magic  at  Oea  in  Africa, 
is  more  in  the  nature  of  special  pleading  intended  to  refute 
and  confound  his  accusers  than  of  a  frank  confession  or 
accurate  history  of  his  career.  However,  he  appears  to  have 
been  born  at  Madaura  in  North  Africa,  to  have  studied  first 
at  Carthage  and  then  at  Athens,  to  have  visited  Rome  and 
wandered  rather  widely  about  the  Mediterranean  world,  but 
to  have  spent  more  time  altogether  at  Carthage  than  at  any 
other  one  place. 

Besides  the  Metamorphoses  and  Apologia,  with  which 
we  shall  be  chiefly  concerned,  four  other  works  are  extant 
which  are  regarded  as  genuine,  The  God  of  Socrates,  The 
Dogma  of  Plato,  Florida,  and  On  the  Universe.  The 
order  in  which  these  works  were  written  is  uncertain,  but  it 
seems  almost  sure  that  the  Metamorphoses  was  the  first.  In 
it  Apuleius  not  only  more  or  less  identifies  himself  with  the 
hero  Lucius,  who  is  represented  as  quite  a  young  man,  he 
also  apologizes  for  his  Latin  and  speaks  of  the  difficulty  with 
which  he  had  acquired  that  language  at  Rome.  But  in  the 
Florida'^  we  find  him  repeating  a  hymn  and  a  dialogue  in 
both  Latin  and  Greek,  or,  after  delivering  half  an  address 
in  Greek,  finishing  it  in  Latin,  or  boasting  that  he  writes 
poems,  satires,  riddles,  histories,  scientific  treatises,  orations, 
and  philosophical  dialogues  with  equal  facility  in  either  lan- 
guage.^ Instead  now  of  craving  pardon  if  he  offends  by 
his  rude,  exotic,  and  forensic  speech,  he  feels  that  his  repu- 
tation for  literary  refinement  and  elegance  has  become  such 
that  his  audience  will  not  pardon  him  a  solitary  solecism  or 
a  single  syllable  pronounced  with  a  barbarous  accent.^     It 


Xap.  i8 


*  "Tarn  graece  quam  latine,  gemi- 


no  veto,  pari  studio,  simili  studio." 
'^Florida,  cap.  9. 


cal  rea- 


VII  APULEIUS  OF  MAD  AURA  223 

therefore  looks  as  if  the  Metamorphoses  was  his  first  pub- 
Hshed  effort  in  Latin  and  as  if  his  pecuHar  style  had  proved 
so  popular  that  he  did  not  find  it  necessary  to  apologize  for 
it  again.  In  the  Apology  he  seems  supremely  confident  of 
his  rhetorical  powers  in  the  Latin  language,  and  even  the 
accusers  describe  him  as  a  philosopher  of  great  eloquence 
both  in  Greek  and  Latin.^  Three  years  before  in  the  same 
town  his  first  public  discourse  had  been  greeted  with  shouts 
of  "Insigniter,"  and  many  in  the  audience  at  the  time  of  his 
trial  can  still  repeat  a  passage  from  it  on  the  greatness  of 
Aesculapius.^  In  the  Apology,  too,  he  displays  a  more 
extensive  learning  than  in  the  Metamorphoses  and  has  writ- 
ten already  poems  and  scientific  treatises  as  well  as  orations. 
Indeed,  practically  all  the  doctrines  set  forth  in  his  other 
philosophical  works  may  be  found  in  brief  in  the  Apology. 

Moreover,  while  in  the  Metamorphoses  Apuleius  ends  Biographi- 
the  narrative  with  what  seems  to  be  his  own  comparatively 
recent  initiation  into  the  mysteries  of  Isis  in  Greece  and 
of  Osiris  at  Rome,  in  the  Apology  ^  he  speaks  of  having" 
been  initiated  in  the  past  into  all  sorts  of  sacred  rites, 
although  he  does  not  mention  Rome  or  Isis  and  Osiris  specifi- 
cally. It  is  implied,  however,  that  he  has  been  at  Rome  in 
more  than  one  passage  of  the  Apology.  Pontianus,  his 
future  step-son,  with  whom  Apuleius  had  become  acquainted 
at  Athens  "not  so  many  years  ago,"  was  "an  adult  at  Rome" 
before  Apuleius  came  to  Oea.  After  they  had  met  again  at 
Oea  and  had  both  married  there,  Apuleius  gave  Pontianus 
a  letter  of  introduction  to  the  proconsul  Lollianus  Avitus  at 
Carthage,  of  whom  he  says,  "I  have  known  intimately  many 
cultured  men  of  Roman  name  in  the  course  of  my  life,  but 
have  never  admired  anyone  as  much  as  him."  Perhaps 
Apuleius  may  have  met  Lollianus  at  Carthage,  but  in  the 
Florida,'^  in  a  panegyric  on  Scipio  Orfitus,  proconsul  of 
Africa  in  163-164  A.  D.,  he  alludes  to  the  time  "when  I 
moved  among  your  friends  in  Rome."    All  this  fits  in  nicely 

^Apologia,  cap.  4.  °Caps.   55-56. 

'Caps.  73  and  SS-  *  Cap.  17. 


224  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

with  the  statements  in  the  closing  chapters  of  the  Metamor- 
phoses concerning  his  rising  fame  as  an  orator  in  the  courts 
of  law  and  "the  laborious  doctrine  of  my  studies"  at  Rome. 
We  may  therefore  reconstruct  the  course  of  events  as  fol- 
lows. After  meeting  Pontianus  at  Athens  and  concluding 
his  studies  in  Greece,  Apuleius  came  to  Rome,  where  he 
remained  for  some  time,  perfecting  his  Latin  style,  engaging 
in  forensic  oratory,  and  publishing  the  Metamorphoses. 
Pontianus,  who  was  younger  than  Apuleius,  either  accom- 
panied or  followed  his  friend  to  Rome,  in  which  city  he 
was  still  residing  after  Apuleius  had  returned  to  Africa. 
But  Pontianus,  too,  had  left  Rome  and  come  back  to  his 
African  city  of  Oea  to  settle  the  question  of  his  mother's 
proposed  second  marriage,  before  Apuleius,  who  had  prob- 
ably revisited  Carthage  in  the  meantime  and  was  now  travel- 
ing east  again  with  the  intention  of  visiting  Alexandria, 
arrived  at  Oea  and  was  induced  to  wed  the  widow,  who  was 
considerably  older  than  he.  On  the  delicate  question  of  this 
lady's  exact  age  depends  our  dating  of  the  birth  of  Apuleius 
and  the  chronology  of  his  entire  career.  At  the  trial  of 
Apuleius  for  magic  Aemilianus,  the  accuser,  declared  that 
she  was  sixty  when  she  married  Apuleius,  and  he  had  previ- 
ously proposed  to  marry  her  to  his  brother,  Clarus,  whom 
Apuleius  calls  "a  decrepit  old  man."  ^  On  the  other  hand, 
Apuleius  asserts  that  the  records,  which  he  produces  in 
court,  of  her  being  accepted  in  infancy  by  her  father  as 
his  child  show  that  she  is  "not  much  over  forty,"  ^ — a  tactful 
ambiguity  which,  inasmuch  as  we  no  longer  have  the  records, 
it  would  probably  be  idle  to  attempt  to  fathom. 
No  men-  The   chief,    if   not   the   only,   objection   to   dating   the 

Metamor-    Metamorphoses  before  the  Apology  is  that  nothing  is  said 
m  th"         ^^  ^^  ^"  ^^^  latter.^     But  obviously  Apuleius,  when  on  trial 
Apology.      for  magic,  would  not  mention  the  Metamorphoses  unless  his 
*  Apologia,  cap.  70.  that  he  places  the  Apology  earlier. 

'  Cap.  8g.  But  for  the  reasons  already  given 

•To  Professor  Butler  (Apulei  I  agree  with  the  article  on  Apu- 
Apologia,  ed.  H.  E.  Butler  and  A.  leius  in  Pauly  and  Wissowa  and 
S.  Owen,  Oxford,  1914)  this  diffi-  its  citations  that  the  Metamor- 
culty     seems     so     insurmountable      phases  is  Apuleius's  first  work. 


VII  APULEIUS  OF  MAD  AURA  225 

accusers  forced  him  to  do  so.  They  may  not  have  yet  heard 
of  it  or  it  may  at  first  have  been  published  anonymously, 
although  the  probability  is  that  Apuleius  v^ould  not  have 
spent  three  years  at  Oea  without  bringing  it  to  his  admirers' 
attention.  Or  they  may  know  of  it,  but  the  judge  may  not 
have  admitted  it  as  evidence  on  the  ground  that  they  must 
prove  that  Apuleius  has  practiced  magic.  The  Metamor- 
phoses does  not  recount  any  personal  participation  of 
Apuleius  himself  in  magic  arts,  unless  one  identifies  him 
throughout  with  the  hero  Lucius;  it  purports  to  be  a  Latin 
rendition  of  Milesian  tales  ^  and  does  not  seem  to  have 
been  taken  very  seriously  until  the  church  fathers  began  to 
cite  it.  Or  the  accusers  may  have  dwelt  upon  it  and  Apuleius 
simply  have  failed  to  take  notice  of  their  charge.  All  these 
suppositions  may  not  seem  very  plausible,  but  on  the  other 
hand  we  may  ask,  how  would  Apuleius  dare  to  write  a  work 
like  the  Metamorphoses  after  he  had  been  accused  and  tried 
of  magic?  One  would  expect  him  then  to  drop  the  subject 
rather  than  to  display  an  increasing  interest  in  it.  But  let 
us  turn  to  his  treatment  of  that  theme  in  both  those  works, 
and  first  consider  the  Metamorphoses. 


IL     Magic  in  the  Metamorphoses 

Vast  power  over  nature  and  spirits  is  attributed  to  magic  Powers 

ned 
magic 


and  its  practitioners  in  the  opening  chapters  of  the  Metamor-  \q^^^ 


phases.  "By  magic's  mutterings  swift  streams  are  reversed, 
the  sea  is  calmed,  the  sun  stopped,  foam  drawn  from  the 
moon,  the  stars  torn  from  the  sky,  and  day  turned  into 
night."  ^  While  such  assertions  are  received  with  some 
scepticism  by  one  listener,  they  are  largely  borne  out  by 
the  subsequent  experiences  of  the  characters  in  the  story 
and  by  the  feats  which  witches  are  made  to  perform.  These 
are  sometimes  humorously  and  extravagantly  presented,  but 
as  crime  and  ferocious  cruelty  are  treated  in  the  same  spirit, 

*  The  work  opens  with  the  state-       called  Milesian  manner,"  and  that 
ment  that  the  author  "will  stitch       "we  begin  with  a  Grecian  story." 
together  varied  stories  in  the  so-  'I,  3. 


perform- 
ances. 


226  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

this  light  vein  cannot  be  regarded  as  an  admission  of  magic's 
unreaHty.  On  the  contrar}',  the  magic  of  Thessaly  is  cele- 
brated with  one  accord  the  world  over.^  Meroe  the  witch 
can  "displace  the  sky,  elevate  the  earth,  freeze  fountains, 
melt  mountains,  raise  ghosts,  bring  down  the  gods,  ex- 
tinguish the  stars,  and  illuminate  the  bottomless  pit."  ^ 
Submerging  the  light  of  starry  heaven  to  the  lowest  depths 
of  hell  is  a  power  also  attributed  to  the  witch  Pamphile.^ 
"By  her  marvelous  secrets  she  makes  ghosts  and  elements 
obey  and  serve  her,  disturbs  the  stars  and  coerces  the 
divinities."  * 
Its  actual  In  none  of  the  episodes  recorded  in  The  Golden  Ass, 

however,  do  the  witches  find  it  necessary  or  advisable  to  go 
to  quite  so  great  lengths  as  these,  although  Pamphile  once 
threatens  the  sun  with  eternal  darkness  because  he  is  so  slow 
in  yielding  to  night  when  she  may  ply  her  sorcery  and 
amours.'^  The  witches  content  themselves  with  such  accom- 
plishments as  carrying  on  love  affairs  with  inhabitants  of 
distant  India,  Ethopia,  and  even  the  Antipodes, — "trifles  of 
the  art  these  and  mere  bagatelles"  ;  ^  with  transforming  their 
enemies  into  animal  forms  or  imprisoning  them  helpless 
in  their  homes,  or  transporting  them  house  and  all  to  a  spot 
a  hundred  miles  off;"^  and,  on  the  other  hand,  with  break- 
ing down  bolted  doors  to  murder  their  victims,^  or  assum- 
ing themselves  the  shape  of  weasels,  birds,  dogs,  mice,  and 
even  insects  in  order  to  work  their  mischief  unobserved ;  ^ 
they  then  cast  their  victims  into  a  deep  sleep  and  cut  their 
throats  or  hang  them  or  mutilate  them.^^  They  often  know 
what  is  being  said  about  them  when  apparently  absent,  and 
they  sometimes  indulge  in  divination  of  the  future. ^^  But  to 
whatever  fields  of  activity  they  may  extend  or  confine  them- 

MI,  I.  'Ill,  16. 

'1,8.  « I,  8. 

'II.   5-  'I   Q-io 

MIX,   15.     The  wording  of  the  « j'  ^j^' 

translated      passages      throughout  ^    '  ■^' 

this  chapter  is  mainly  my  own,  but  ^^^t'  ^^  ^"  ,  jv 

I  have  made  some  use  of  existing  H.  20  and  30;  lA,  29. 

English  translations.  "I.  n;  H,  11. 


VII  APULEIUS  OF  MAD  AURA  227 

selves,  their  violent  power  is  irresistible,  and  we  are  given 
to  understand  that  it  is  useless  to  try  to  fight  against  it  or 
to  escape  it.  Its  secret  and  occult  character  is  also  empha- 
sized, and  the  adjective  caeca  or  noun  latehrae  are  more  than 
once  employed  to  describe  it.^ 

Yet  there  are  also  suggested  certain  limitations  to  the  Its  limita- 
power  of  magic.  The  witches  seem  to  break  down  the 
bolted  doors,  but  these  resume  their  former  place  when  the 
hags  have  departed,  and  are  to  all  appearances  as  intact  as 
before.  The  man,  too,  whose  throat  they  have  cut,  whose 
blood  they  have  drained  off,  and  whose  heart  they  have 
removed,  awakes  apparently  alive  the  next  morning  and 
resumes  his  journey.  All  the  events  of  the  preceding  night 
seem  to  have  been  merely  an  unpleasant  dream.  The  witches 
had  stuffed  a  sponge  into  the  wound  of  his  throat  -  with  the 
adjuration,  "Oh  you  sponge,  born  in  the  sea,  beware  of 
crossing  running  water."  In  the  morning  his  traveling  com- 
panion can  see  no  sign  of  wound  or  sponge  on  his  friend's 
throat.  But  when  he  stoops  to  drink  from  a  brook,  out 
falls  the  sponge  and  he  drops  dead.  The  inference,  although 
Apuleius  draws  none,  is  obvious ;  witches  can  make  a  corpse 
seem  alive  for  a  while  but  not  for  long,  and  magic  ceases 
to  work  when  you  cross  running  water.  We  also  get  the 
impression  that  there  is  something  deceptive  and  illusive 
about  the  magic  of  the  witches,  and  that  only  the  lusts  and 
crimes  are  real  which  their  magic  enables  them  or  their 
employers  to  commit  and  gratify.  They  may  seem  to  draw 
down  the  sun,  but  it  is  found  shining  next  day  as  usual. 
When  Lucius  is  transformed  into  an  ass,  he  retains  his 
human  appetite  and  tenderness  of  skin,^ — a  deplorable  state 
of  mind  and  body  which  must  be  attributed  to  the  imper- 

^11,  20,  22;  III,  18.  of  the  tribe,  drag  him  a  hundred 

'Very  similar  practices   are   re-  yards  or  so  from  the  camp,  cut  up 

counted  by  A.  W.  Howitt,  Native  his    abdomen    obliquely,    take    out 

Tribes    of    South-East    Australia,  the  kidney  and  caul-fat,  and  then 

PP-  355-96;   "the  medicine-men  of  ?tuff  a  handful  of  grass  and  sand 

hostile  tribes  sneak  into  the  camp  into  the  wound." 
in  the  night,  and  with  a  net  of  a 

peculiar   construction   garotte  one  '  VI,  26. 


228 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


The 

crimes  of 
witches. 


Male 
magicians. 


Magic  as 
an  art  and 
discipline. 


fections  of  the  magic  art  as  well  as  to  the  humorous  cruelty 
of  the  author. 

In  The  Golden  Ass  the  practitioners  of  magic  are  usually 
witches  and  old  and  repulsive.  We  have  to  deal  with  won- 
ders worked  by  old-wives  and  not  by  Magi  of  Persia  or 
Babylon.  As  we  have  seen  and  shall  see  yet  further,  their 
deeds  are  regarded  as  illicit  and  criminal.  They  are  "most 
wicked  women"  (nequissimae  mulieres),^  intent  upon  lust 
and  crime.  They  practice  devotiones,  injurious  impreca- 
tions and  ceremonies.^ 

Male  practitioners  of  magic  are  represented  in  a  less 
unfavorable  light.  An  Egyptian,  who  in  return  for  a  large 
sum  of  money  engages  to  invoke  the  spirit  of  a  dead  man 
and  restore  the  corpse  momentarily  to  life,  is  called  a  prophet 
and  a  priest,  though  he  seems  a  manifest  necromancer  and  is 
himself  adjured  to  lend  his  aid  and  to  "have  pity  by  the 
stars  of  heaven,  by  the  infernal  deities,  by  the  elements  of 
nature,  and  by  the  silence  of  night,"  ^ — expressions  which 
are  certainly  suggestive  of  the  magic  powers  elsewhere 
ascribed  to  witches.  The  hero  of  the  story,  Lucius,  is  ani- 
mated in  his  dabblings  in  the  magic  art  by  idle  curiosity 
combined  with  thirst  for  learning,  but  not  by  any  criminal 
motive.^  Yet  after  he  has  been  transformed  into  an  ass  by 
magic,  he  fears  to  resume  his  human  form  suddenly  in 
public,  lest  he  be  put  to  death  on  suspicion  of  practicing  the 
magic  art.^ 

Magic  is  depicted  not  merely  as  irresistible  or  occult  or 
criminal  or  fallacious;  it  is  also  regularly  called  an  art  and 
a  discipline.  Even  the  practices  of  the  witches  are  so  dig- 
nified, Pamphile  has  nothing  less  than  a  laboratory  on  the 
roof  of  her  house, — a  wooden  shelter,  concealed  from  view 
but  open  to  the  winds  of  heaven  and  to  the  four  points  of 
the  compass, — where  she  may  ply  her  secret  arts  and  where 
she  spreads  out  her  "customary  apparatus."  ^    This  consists 


*II,   22. 

"I,  10 ;  VII,  14;  IX,  23,29. 
"11,  28. 


MI,  6;  III,  19. 
•Ill,  29. 
•III.  17. 


VII  APULEIUS  OF  MAD  AURA  229 

of  all  sorts  of  aromatic  herbs,  of  metal  plates  inscribed  with 
cryptic  characters,  a  chest  filled  with  little  boxes  containing- 
various  ointments,^  and  portions  of  human  corpses  obtained 
from  sepulchers,  shipwrecks  (or  birds  of  prey,  according  as 
the  reading  is  navium  or  avium),  public  executions,  and  the 
victims  of  wild  beasts.^  It  will  be  recalled  that  Galen  repre- 
sented medical  students  as  most  likely  to  secure  human 
skeletons  or  bodies  to  dissect  from  somewhat  similar 
sources;  and  possibly  they  might  incur  suspicion  of  magic 
thereby. 

All  this  makes  it  clear  that  to  work  magic  one  must  have  Materials 
materials.  The  witches  seem  especially  avid  for  parts  of  ^"^PWed. 
the  human  body.  Pamphile  sends  her  maid,  Fotis,  to  the 
barber's  shop  to  try  to  steal  some  cuttings  of  the  hair  of  a 
youth  of  whom  she  is  enamoured ;  ^  and  another  story  is 
told  of  witches  who  by  mistake  cut  off  and  replaced  with 
wax  the  nose  and  ears  of  a  man  guarding  the  corpse  instead 
of  those  of  the  dead  body.^  Other  witches  who  murdered 
a  man  carefully  collected  his  blood  in  a  bladder  and  took 
it  away  with  them.^  But  parts  of  other  animals  are  also 
employed  in  their  magic,  and  stones  as  well  as  varied  herbs 
and  twigs. ^  In  trying  to  entice  the  beloved  Boeotian  youth 
Pamphile  used  still  quivering  entrails  and  poured  libations 
of  spring  water,  milk,  and  honey,  as  well  as  placing  the 
hairs — ^which  she  supposed  were  his — with  many  kinds  of 
incense  upon  live  coals. "^  To  turn  herself  into  an  owl  she 
anointed  herself  from  top  to  toe  with  ointment  from  one 
of  her  little  boxes,  and  also  made  much  use  of  a  lamp.®  To 
regain  her  human  form  she  has  only  to  drink,  and  bathe  in, 
spring  water  mixed  with  anise  and  laurel  leaf, — "See  how 
great  a  result  is  attained  by  such  small  and  insignificant 
herbs  !"^ — while  Lucius  is  told  that  eating  roses  will  re- 
fill, 21.  «II,  5.  "Surculis  et  lapillis  et  id 

I,   10;  II,  20-21.  genus  frivolis  inhalatis." 

'HI,   16.  'Ill,  18. 

*II,  23-30.  "HI,  21. 

•I,  13.  »III,  23. 


230 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Quacks 
and  char- 
latans. 


Store  him  from  asinine  to  human  form.^  The  Egyptian 
prophet  makes  use  of  herbs  in  his  necromancy,  placing  one 
on  the  face  and  another  on  the  breast  of  the  corpse;  and  he 
himself  wears  linen  robes  and  sandals  of  palm  leaves.^ 

Besides  materials,  incantations  are  much  employed,^ 
while  the  Egyptian  prophet  turns  towards  the  east  and 
"silently  imprecates"  the  rising  sun.  As  this  last  suggests, 
careful  observance  of  rite  and  ceremony  also  play  their  part, 
and  Pamphile's  painstaking  procedure  is  described  in  precise 
detail.  Divine  aid  is  once  mentioned  ^  and  is  perhaps  another 
essential  for  success.  More  than  one  witch  is  called  divina^ 
and  magic  is  termed  a  divine  discipline.^  But  we  have  also 
heard  the  witches  spoken  of  as  coercing  the  gods  rather 
than  depending  upon  them  for  assistance.  Their  magic 
seems  to  be  performed  mainly  by  using  things  and  words  in 
the  right  ways. 

Besides  the  witches  (magae  or  sagae)  and  what  Apuleius 
calls  magic  by  name,  a  number  of  other  charlatans  and 
superstitions  of  a  kindred  nature  are  mentioned  in  The 
Golden  Ass.  Such  a  one  is  the  Egyptian  "prophet"  already 
described.  Such  was  the  Chaldean  who  for  a  time  as- 
tounded Corinth  by  his  wonderful  predictions,  but  had 
been  unable  to  foresee  his  own  shipwreck.'^  On  learning 
this  last  fact,  a  business  man  who  was  about  to  pay  him  one 
hundred  denarii  for  a  prognostication  snatched  up  his 
money  again  and  made  off.  Such  were  the  painted  disrepu- 
table crew  of  the  Syrian  goddess  who  went  about  answering 
all  inquiries  concerning  the  future  with  the  same  ambiguous 
couplet.^  Such  were  the  jugglers  whom  Lucius  saw  at 
Athens   swallowing   swords   or    balancing   a   spear   in   the 


'in,  25. 
'U,  28. 

'  Examples  are :  I,  3,  magico 
susurramine;  II,  i,  artis  magicae 
nativa  cantamina ;  II,  5,  omnis 
carminis  sepulchralis  magistra 
creditur;  II,  22,  diris  cantamini- 
bus  somno  custodes  obruunt ;  III, 
18,     tunc     decantatis     spirantibus 


fibris;  III,  21,  multumque  cum 
lucerna  secreta  collocuta. 

*I,    II,   quo   numinis   ministerio. 

^  I,  8,  saga,  inquit,  et  divina ; 
IX,  29,  saga  ilia  et  divini  potens. 

'Ill,   19. 

'II,    12-14. 

*VIII,  26-27;  IX,  8. 


VII 


APULEWS  OF  MAD  AURA  231 


throat  while  a  boy  climbed  to  the  top  of  it.-^    Such  were  the 
physicians  who  turned  poisoners." 

Other  passages  allude  to  astrology  ^  besides  that  already  Various 
cited  concerning  the  Chaldean.  Divination  from  dreams  is  ^<^q^I^  ^' 
also  discussed.  In  the  fourth  book  the  old  female  servant 
tells  the  captive  maiden  not  to  be  terrified  "by  the  idle  fig- 
ments of  dreams"  and  explains  that  they  often  go  by  con- 
traries ;  but  in  the  last  book  the  hero  is  several  times  guided 
or  forewarned  by  dreams.  Omens  are  believed  in.  Starting 
left  foot  first  loses  a  man  a  business  opportunity,^  and 
another  is  kicked  out  of  a  house  for  his  ill-omened  words."^ 
The  violent  deaths  of  all  three  sons  of  the  owner  of  another 
house  are  presaged  by  the  following  remarkable  conglomera- 
tion of  untoward  portents:  a  hen  lays  a  chick  instead  of  an 
tgg ;  blood  spurts  up  from  under  the  table ;  a  servant  rushes 
in  to  announce  that  the  wine  is  boiling  in  all  the  jars  in  the 
cellar;  a  weasel  is  seen  dragging  a  dead  snake  out-of-doors; 
a  green  frog  leaps  from  the  sheep-dog's  mouth  and  then  a 
ram  tears  open  the  dog's  throat  at  one  bite.^ 

Of  scientific  discussion  or  information  there  is  little  in   Some  bits 

of  science 

the  Metamorphoses.  When  Pamphile  foretells  the  weather  and 
for  the  next  day  by  inspection  of  her  lamp,  Lucius  suggests  religion, 
that  this  artificial  flame  may  retain  some  properties  from 
its  heavenly  original. '^  The  herb  mandragora  is  described 
as  inducing  a  sleep  similar  to  death,  but  as  not  fatal;  and 
the  beaver  is  said  to  emasculate  itself  in  order  to  escape  its 
hunters.^  We  should  feel  lost  without  mention  of  a  dragon 
in  a  book  of  this  sort,  and  one  is  introduced  who  is  large 
enough  to  devour  a  man.^  It  is  interesting  to  note  for  pur- 
poses of  comparison, — inasmuch  as  we  shall  presently  take 
up  the  Life  of  Apollonius  of  Tyana,  a  Neo-Pythagorean, 
and  later  shall  learn  from  the  Recognitions  of  Clement  that 
the  apostle  Peter  was  accustomed  to  bathe  at  dawn  in  the 
*I,  4.  'II,  11-12. 

*X,  II,  25.  *X,  II.   For  bibliography  on  the 

'VIII,  24;  XI,  22,  25.  mandragora  see  Frazer    (1918)    I, 

*  I,  5.  2>77,  note  2,  in  his  chapter,  "Jacob 

"  II,  26.  and  the  Mandrakes." 

"  IX,  33-34-  -VIII,  21. 


232 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Magic  in 
other 
Greek 
romances. 


sea, — that  Lucius,  while  still  in  the  form  of  an  ass,  in  his 
zeal  for  purification  plunged  into  the  sea  and  submerged  his 
head  beneath  the  wave  seven  times,  because  the  divine 
Pythagoras  had  proclaimed  that  number  as  especially  appro- 
priate to  religious  rites.^  **It  has  been  said  that  The  Golden 
Ass  is  the  first  book  in  European  literature  showing  piety 
in  the  modern  sense,  and  the  most  disreputable  adventures 
of  Lucius  lead,  it  is  true,  in  the  end  to  a  religious  climax." 
But,  adds  Professor  Duncan  B.  Macdonald,  "Few  books, 
in  spite  of  fantastic  gleams  of  color  and  light,  move  under 
such  leaden-weighted  skies  as  The  Golden  Ass.  There  is  no 
real  God  in  that  world;  all  things  are  in  the  hands  of  en- 
chanters; man  is  without  hope  for  here  and  hereafter;  full 
of  yearnings  he  struggles  and  takes  refuge  in  strange 
cults."  2 

While  magic  plays  a  larger  part  in  The  Golden  Ass  than 
in  any  other  extant  Greek  romance,  it  is  not  unusual  in  the 
others  to  find  the  hero  and  heroine  exposed  to  perils  from 
magicians,  or  themselves  falsely  charged  with  magic,  as  in 
the  Aethiopica  of  Heliodorus,  where  Charicles  is  "con- 
demned to  be  burned  on  a  charge  of  poisoning."  ^  In  the 
Christian  romances,  too,  as  the  Recognitions  will  show  us 
later,  there  are  plenty  of  allusions  to  magic  and  demons. 
Meanwhile  we  are  reminded  that  in  the  Roman  Empire  accu- 
sations of  magic  were  made  not  merely  in  story  books  but 
in  real  life  by  the  trial  for  magic  of  the  author  of  the 
Metamorphoses  himself,  and  we  next  turn  to  the  Apology 
which  he  delivered  upon  that  occasion. 


Form 
of  the 
Apologia. 


IIL     Magic  in  the  Apology 

The  Apologia  has  every  appearance  of  being  preserved 
just  as  it  was  delivered  and  perhaps  as  it  was  taken  down 
by  shorthand  writers ;  it  does  not  seem  to  have  undergone 
the  subsequent  revision  to  which  Cicero  subjected  some  of 
his  orations.     It  must  have  been  hastily  composed,  since 


*XI,  I. 

•Macdonald  (1909),  p.  128. 


"VIII,  9. 


VII  APULEIUS  OF  MAD  AURA  233 

Apuleius  states  that  it  has  been  only  five  or  six  days  since 
the  charges  were  suddenly  brought  against  him,  while  he 
was  occupied  in  defending  another  lawsuit  brought  against 
his  wife.^  There  also  are  numerous  apparently  extempore 
passages  in  the  oration,  notably  those  where  Apuleius 
alludes  to  the  effect  which  his  statements  produce,  now  upon 
his  accusers,  now  upon  the  proconsul  sitting  in  judgment. 
From  the  Florida  we  know  that  Apuleius  was  accustomed  to 
improvise.^  Moreover,  in  the  Apology  certain  statements 
are  made  by  Apuleius  which  might  be  turned  against  him 
with  damaging  effect  and  which  he  probably  would  have 
omitted,  had  he  had  the  leisure  to  go  over  his  speech  care- 
fully before  the  trial.  For  instance,  in  denying  the  charge 
that  he  had  caused  to  be  made  for  himself  secretly  out  of 
the  finest  wood  a  horrible  magic  figure  in  the  form  of  a 
ghost  or  skeleton,  he  declares  that  it  is  only  a  little  image  of 
Mercury  made  openly  by  a  well-known  artisan  of  the  town.' 
But  he  has  earlier  stated  that  "Mercury,  carrier  of  incanta- 
tions," is  one  of  the  deities  invoked  in  magic  rites ;  "*  and  in 
another  passage  ^  has  recounted  how  the  outcome  of  the 
Mithridatic  war  was  investigated  at  Tralles  by  magic,  and 
how  a  boy,  gazing  at  an  image  of  Mercury  in  water,  had 
predicted  the  future  in  one  hundred  and  sixty  verses.  But 
this  is  not  all.  In  a  third  passage  ®  he  actually  quotes 
Pythagoras  to  the  effect  that  Mercury  ought  not  to  be  carved 
out  of  every  kind  of  wood. 

*  Cap.  I.  Osiris,  says  Budge  at  p.  85,  "a 
'Florida,  caps.  24-26.  figure  was  fashioned  in  such  a 
'Caps.  61-63.  The  following  way  as  to  include  the  chief  char- 
passages  from  E.  A.  W.  Budge,  acteristics  of  the  forms  of  these 
Egyptian  Magic  (1899),  perhaps  gods,  and  was  inserted  in  a  rect- 
furnish  an  explanation  of  the  true  angular  wooden  stand  which  was 
purpose  and  character  of  Apu-  intended  to  represent  the  coffin  or 
leius's  wooden  figure:  p.  84,  chest  out  of  which  the  trinity 
"Under  the  heading  of  'Magical  Ptah-Seker-Ausar  came  forth. 
Figures'  must  certainly  be  in-  On  the  figure  itself  and  on  the 
eluded  the  so-called  Ptah-Seker-  sides  of  the  stand  were  inscribed 
Ausar  figure,  which  is  usually  prayers.  .  .  ."  Such  a  figure  in  a 
made  of  wood ;  it  is  often  solid,  coffin  might  well  be  described  by 
but  is  sometimes  made  hollow,  the  accusers  as  the  horrible  form 
and  is  usually  let  into  a  rectangu-  of  a  ghost  or  skeleton, 
lar  wooden  stand  which  may  be  *  Cap.  31. 
either  solid  or  hollow."  To  get  °  Cap.  42. 
the  protection  of  Ptah,  Seker,  and  '  Cap.  43. 


234  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

Philosophy  If  in  the  Metamorphoses  the  practice  of  magic  is  im- 
magic.  py^g^j  chiefly  to  old-wives,  in  the  Apology  a  main  concern  of 
Apuleius  is  to  defend  philosophers  in  general  ^  and  himself 
in  particular  from  "the  calumny  of  magic."  ^  Epimenides, 
Orpheus,  Pythagoras,  Ostanes,  Empedocles,  Socrates,  and 
Plato  have  been  so  suspected,  and  it  consoles  Apuleius  in 
his  own  trial  to  reflect  that  he  is  but  sharing  the  undeserved 
fate  of  "so  many  and  such  great  men."  ^  In  this  connection 
he  states  that  those  philosophers  who  have  taken  an  especial 
interest  in  theology,  "who  investigate  the  providence  of  the 
universe  too  curiously  and  celebrate  the  gods  too  enthusias- 
tically," are  the  ones  to  be  suspected  of  magic;  while  those 
who  devote  themselves  to  natural  science  pure  and  simple 
are  more  liable  to  be  called  irreligious  atheists. 

Magic  But  what  is  it  to  be  a  magician,  Apuleius  asks  the  ac- 

^  "^  •  cusers,*  and  therewith  we  face  again  the  question  of  the 
definition  of  magic,  and  Apuleius  gradually  answers  his  own 
query  in  the  course  of  the  oration.  Magic,  in  the  ordinary 
use  of  the  word,  is  described  in  much  the  same  way  as  in 
the  Metamorphoses.  It  has  been  proscribed  by  Roman  law 
since  the  Twelve  Tables ;  it  is  hideous  and  horrible ;  it  is 
secret  and  solitary;  it  murmurs  its  incantations  in  the  dark- 
ness of  the  night.^  It  is  an  art  of  ill  repute,  of  illicit  evil 
deeds,  of  crimes  and  enormities.^  Instead  of  simply  calling 
it  magia,  Apuleius  often  applies  to  it  the  double  expres- 
sion, magica  maleficia.'^  Perhaps  he  does  this  intention- 
ally. In  one  passage  he  states  that  he  will  refute  certain 
charges  which  the  accusers  have  brought  against  him,  first, 
by  showing  that  the  things  he  has  been  charged  with  have 
nothing  to  do  with  magic ;  and  second,  by  proving  that,  even 
if  he  were  a  magician,  there  was  no  cause  or  occasion  for 
his  having  committed  any  maleficiuni  in  this  connection.' 

*  Caps.  1-3.  mcnt  soupgonnes  de  Magie,  Paris, 

'Cap.  2.  1625. 

•Caps.  27  and  31.    For  the  same         *  Cap.  25. 
thought    applied    in    the    case    of  "  Cap.  47. 

medieval  men  see  Gabriel  Naude,  *  Cap.  25. 

Apologie    pour    tons    les    grands  '  Caps.  9,  42,  61,  6^. 

^"rsonoges   qui   ont   este  fiusse-         "  Cap.  28. 


VII  APULEWS  OF  MAD  AURA  235 

That  is  to  say,  maleficium,  literally  "an  evil  deed,"  means 
an  injury  done  another  by  means  of  magic  art.  The  pro- 
consul sitting  in  judgment  takes  a  similar  view  and  has 
asked  the  accusers,  Apuleius  tells  us,^  when  they  asserted 
that  a  woman  had  fallen  into  an  epileptic  fit  in  his  pres- 
ence and  that  this  was  due  to  his  having  bewitched  her, 
whether  the  woman  died  or  what  good  her  having  a  fit 
did  Apuleius.  This  is  significant  as  hinting  that  Roman 
law  did  not  condemn  a  man  for  magic  unless  he  were  proved 
to  have  committed  some  crime  or  made  some  unjust  gain 
thereby. 

Does  Apuleius  for  his  part  mean  to  suggest  a  distinction  Good  and 
between  magia  and  magica  maleficia,  and  to  hint,  as  he  did 
not  do  in  the  Metamorphoses,  that  there  is  a  good  as  well  as 
a  bad  magic?  He  cannot  be  said  to  maintain  any  such  dis- 
tinction consistently;  often  in  the  Apology  magia  alone  as 
well  as  maleficium  is  used  in  a  bad  sense.  But  he  does  sug- 
gest such  a  thought  and  once  voices  it  quite  explicitly.^ 
"If,"  he  says,  "as  I  have  read  in  many  authors,  magus  in  the 
Persian  language  corresponds  to  the  word  sacerdos  in  ours, 
what  crime,  pray,  is  it  to  be  a  priest  and  duly  know  and  un- 
derstand and  cherish  the  rules  of  ceremonial,  the  sacred  cus- 
toms, the  laws  of  religion?"  Plato  describes  magic  as  part 
of  the  education  of  the  young  Persian  prince  by  the  four 
wisest  and  best  men  of  the  realm,  one  of  whom  instructs 
him  in  the  magic  of  Zoroaster  which  is  the  worship  of  the 
gods.  "Do  you  hear,  you  who  rashly  charge  me  with  magic, 
that  this  art  is  acceptable  to  the  immortal  gods,  consists  in 
celebrating  and  reverencing  them,  is  pious  and  prophetic, 
and  long  since  was  held  by  Zoroaster  and  Oromazes,  its  au- 
thors, to  be  noble  and  divine?"  ^  In  common  speech,  how- 
ever, Apuleius  recognizes  that  a  magician  is  one  "who  by 
his  power  of  addressing  the  immortal  gods  is  able  to  accom- 
plish whatever  he  will  by  an  almost  incredible  force  of  in- 
cantations." But  anyone  who  believes  that  another  man 
possesses  such  a  power  as  this  should  be  afraid  to  accuse  him, 

*  Cap.  48.  "  Cap.  25.  '  Cap.  26. 


236  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

says  Apuleius,  who  thinks  by  this  ingenious  dilemma  to 
prove  the  insincerity  of  his  accusers.  Nevertheless  he  pres- 
ently mentions  that  Mercury,  Venus,  Luna,  and  Trivia  are 
the  deities  usually  summoned  in  the  ceremonies  of  the  ma- 
gicians.^ 
Magic  and  It  will  be  noted  that  Apuleius  connects  magic  with  the 
gods  and  religion  more  in  the  Apology  than  in  the  Metamor- 
phoses. There  his  emphasis  was  on  the  natural  materials 
employed  by  the  witches  and  their  almost  scientific  labora- 
tories. But  in  the  Apology  both  Persian  Magi  and  common 
magicians  are  associated  with  the  worship  or  invocation  of 
the  gods,  and  it  is  theologians  rather  than  natural  philoso- 
phers who  incur  suspicion  of  magic. 

Magic  and  But  it  may  be  that  the  reason  why  Apuleius  abstains  in 

science  •  •  • 

the  Apology  from  suggesting  any  connection  or  confusion 

between  magic  and  natural  science  is  that  the  accusers  have 
already  laid  far  too  much  stress  upon  this  point  for  his  lik- 
ing. He  has  been  charged  with  the  composition  of  a  tooth- 
powder,-  with  use  of  a  mirror,^  with  the  purchase  of  a  sea- 
hare,  a  poisonous  mollusc,  and  two  other  fish  appropriate 
from  their  obscene  shapes  and  names  for  use  as  love-charms,* 
He  is  said  to  have  had  a  horrible  wooden  image  or  seal  con- 
structed secretly  for  use  in  his  magic, ^  to  keep  other  instru- 
ments of  his  art  mysteriously  wrapped  in  a  handkerchief  in 
the  house, ^  and  to  have  left  in  the  vestibule  of  another  house 
where  he  lodged  "many  feathers  of  birds"  and  much  soot 
on  the  walls. "^  All  these  charges  make  it  evident  that  natural 
and  artificial  objects  are,  as  in  the  Metamorphoses,  consid- 
ered essential  or  at  least  usual  in  performing  magic.  More- 
over, so  ready  have  the  accusers  shown  themselves  to  inter- 
pret the  interest  of  Apuleius  in  natural  science  as  an  evi- 
dence of  the  practice  of  magic  by  him,  that  he  sarcastically 
remarks  ^  that  he  is  glad  that  they  were  unaware  that  he  had 
read  Theophrastus  On  beasts  that  bite  and  sting  and  Ni- 

*Cap.  31.  "Cap.  61, 

*  Cap.  6.  "  Cap.  53- 

•  Cap.  13.  '  Cap.  58. 
*Caps.  30,  33,  "Cap.  41, 


VII  APULEIUS  OF  MAD  AURA  237 

cander  On  the  bites  of  wild  beasts  (usually  called 
Theriaca),^  or  they  would  have  accused  him  of  being  a 
poisoner  as  well  as  a  magician. 

Apuleius  shows  that  he  really  is  a  student,  if  not  an  au-  Medical 
thority,  in  medicine  and  natural  science.  The  gift  of  the  scientific 
tooth-powder  and  the  falling  of  the  woman  in  a  fit  were  inci-  knowledgt 
dents  of  his  occasional  practice  of  medicine,  and  he  also  sees  leius. 
no  harm  in  his  seeking  certain  remedies  from  fish.^  He 
repeats  Plato's  theory  of  disease  from  the  Timaeus  and  cites 
Theophrastus's  admirable  work  On  Epileptics.^  Mention 
of  the  mirror  starts  him  off  upon  an  optical  disquisition 
in  which  he  remarks  upon  theories  of  vision  and  reflection, 
upon  liquid  and  solid,  flat  and  convex  and  concave  mirrors, 
and  cites  the  Catoptrica  of  Archimedes.*  He  also  regards 
himself  as  an  experimental  zoologist  and  has  conducted  all 
his  researches  publicly.^  He  procures  fish  in  order  to  study 
them  scientifically  as  Aristotle,  Theophrastus,  Eudemus, 
Lycon,  and  other  pupils  of  Plato  did.®  He  has  read  innumer- 
able books  of  this  sort  and  sees  no  harm  in  testing  by  ex- 
perience what  has  been  written.  Indeed  he  is  himself  writ- 
ing in  both  Greek  and  Latin  a  work  on  Natural  Questions 
in  which  he  hopes  to  add  what  has  been  omitted  in  earlier 
books  and  to  remedy  some  of  their  defects  and  to  arrange 
all  in  a  handier  and  more  systematic  fashion.  He  has  pas- 
sages from  the  section  on  fishes  in  this  work  read  aloud  in 
court. 

Throughout  the  Apology  Apuleius  occasionally  airs  his  He  repeats 
scientific  attainments  by  specific  statements  and  illustrations  errx)!-^'^ 
from  the  zoological  and  other  scientific  fields.     Indeed  the 

^  Nicander   lived    in   the    second  at    Paris,    which    O.    M.    Dalton 
century    B.C.    under    Attalus    III  (Bycantine  Art  and  Archaeology, 
of     Pergamum.     Of     his     works  p.  483)   says  "is  evidently  a  pains- 
there  are  extant  the   Theriaca  in  taking  copy  of  a  very  early  orig- 
958  hexameters  and  another  poem,  inal,  perhaps  almost  contemporary 
the  Alexipharmaca,  of  630  lines;  with   Nicander  himself." 
ed.    J.    G.    Schneider,     1792    and  ^  Cap.  40. 
1816;     by     O.     Schneider,     1856.  'Caps.  49-51. 
There  is  an  illuminated   eleventh  *  Caps.  15-16. 
century  manuscript  of  the  Then-  "Cap.  40. 
aca  in  the  Bibliotheque  Nationale  °  Cap.   36. 


238  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

presence  of  such  allusions  is  as  noticeable  in  the  Apology  as 
was  their  absence  from  the  Metamorphoses.  But  they  go  to 
show  that  his  knowledge  was  greater  than  his  discretion, 
since  for  the  most  part  they  repeat  familiar  errors  of  con- 
temporary science.  We  are  told — the  story  is  also  in  Aris- 
totle, Pliny,  and  Aelian — how  the  crocodile  opens  its  jaws  to 
have  its  teeth  picked  by  a  friendly  bird,^  that  the  viper  gnaws 
its  way  out  of  its  mother's  womb,^  that  fish  are  spontane- 
ously generated  from  slime,^  and  that  burning  the  stone  gag- 
ates  will  cause  an  epileptic  to  have  a  fit.*  On  the  other  hand, 
the  skin  shed  by  a  spotted  lizard  is  a  remedy  for  epilepsy, 
but  you  must  snatch  it  up  speedily  or  the  lizard  will  turn 
and  devour  it,  either  from  natural  appetite  or  just  because 
he  knows  that  you  want  it.^  This  tale,  so  characteristic  of 
the  virtues  attributed  to  parts  of  animals  and  the  human 
motives  ascribed  to  the  animals  themselves,  is  taken  by  Apu- 
leius  from  a  treatise  by  Theophrastus  entitled  Jealous  Ani- 
mals. 
Apparent  In  defending  what  he  terms  his  scientific  investigations 

o^"maei(f  fi"oni  the  aspersion  of  magic  Apuleius  is  at  times  either  a 
and  occult  trifle  disingenuous  and  inclined  to  trade  upon  the  ignorance 
of  his  judge  and  accusers,  or  else  not  as  well  informed  him- 
self as  he  might  be  in  matters  of  natural  science  and  of  oc- 
cult science.  He  contends  that  fish  are  not  employed  in 
magic  arts,  asks  mockingly  if  fish  alone  possess  some  prop- 
erty hidden  from  other  men  and  known  to  magicians,  and 
affirms  that  if  the  accuser  knows  of  any  such  he  must  be  a 
magician  rather  than  Apuleius.®  He  insists  that  he  did  not 
make  use  of  a  sea-hare  and  describes  the  "fish"  in  question 
in  detail,'''  but  this  description,  as  is  pointed  out  in  Butler 
and  Owen's  edition  of  the  Apology,^  tends  to  convince  us 
that  it  really  was  a  sea-hare.  In  the  case  of  the  two  fish  with 
obscene  names,  he  ridicules  the  arguing  from  similarity  of 
names  to  similarity  of  powers  in  the  things  so  designated,  as 

*Cap.  8.  'Cap.  51. 

'  Cap.  85.  '  Caps.  30,  42. 

'  Cap.  38.  '  Cap.  40. 

'  Cap.  45-  "  P.  98. 


virtue. 


VII  APULEIUS  OF  MAD  AURA  239 

if  that  were  not  what  magicians  and  astrologers  and  believ- 
ers in  sympathy  and  antipathy  were  always  doing.  You 
might  as  well  say,  he  declares,  that  a  pebble  is  good  for  the 
stone  and  a  crab  for  an  ulcer,^  as  if  precisely  these  remedies 
for  those  diseases  were  not  found  in  the  Pseudo-Dioscorides 
and  in  Pliny's  Natural  History."^ 

It  is  hardly  probable  that  in  the  passages  just  cited  Apu-  Despite  an 
leius  was  pretending  to  be  ignorant  of  matters  with  which  ^f  ]^^ow\°" 
he  was  really  acquainted,  since  as  a  rule  he  is  eager  to  show  edge, 
off  his  knowledge  even  of  magic  itself.  Thus  the  accusers 
affirmed  that  he  had  bewitched  a  boy  by  incantations  in  a 
secret  place  with  an  altar  and  a  lamp ;  Apuleius  criticizes 
their  story  by  saying  that  they  should  have  added  that  he 
employed  the  boy  for  purposes  of  divination,  citing  tales 
which  he  has  read  to  this  efifect  in  Varro  and  many  other 
authors.^  And  he  himself  is  ready  to  believe  that  the  hu- 
man soul,  especially  in  one  who  is  still  young  and  innocent, 
may,  if  soothed  and  distracted  by  incantations  and  odors, 
forget  the  present,  return  to  its  divine  and  immortal  nature, 
and  predict  the  future.  When  he  reads  some  technical 
Greek  names  from  his  treatise  on  fishes,  he  suspects  that  the 
accuser  will  protest  that  he  is  uttering  magic  names  in  some 
Egyptian  or  Babylonian  rite.^  And  as  a  matter  of  fact,  when 
later  he  mentioned  the  names  of  a  number  of  celebrated  ma- 
gicians,^ the  accusers  appear  to  have  raised  such  a  tumult 
that  Apuleius  deemed  it  prudent  to  assure  the  judge  that  he 
had  simply  read  them  in  reputable  books  in  public  libraries, 
and  that  to  know  such  names  was  one  thing,  to  practice  the 
magic  art  quite  another  matter. 

Apuleius  affirms  that  one  of  his  accusers  had  consulted  Attitude 

he  knows  not  what  Chaldeans  how  he  might  profitably  marry  toward 

°       ^    _  •'  •'    astrology. 

off  his  daughter,  and  that  they  had  prophesied  truthfully 
that  her  first  husband  would  die  within  a  few  months.  "As 
for  what  she  would  inherit  from  him,  they  fixed  that  up,  as 

^  Cap.  35.  Giessen,  1908,  p.  224. 

'So  Abt  has  pointed  out:    Die  *  Caps.  A^-AZ- 

Apologie    des    Apuleius  von   Ma-  *  Cap.  38. 

dau^a    und    die    antike  Zauberei,  *  Cap.  90. 


'  240  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

they  usually  do,  to  suit  the  person  consulting  them."  ^  But 
in  this  respect  their  prediction  turned  out  to  be  quite  incor- 
rect. We  are  left  in  some  doubt,  however,  whether  their 
failure  in  the  second  case  is  not  regarded  as  due  merely  to 
their  knavery,  and  their  first  successful  prediction  to  the 
rule  of  the  stars.  Elsewhere,  however,  Apuleius  does  state 
that  belief  in  fate  and  in  magic  are  incompatible,  since  there 
is  no  place  left  for  the  force  of  spells  and  incantations,  if 
everything  is  ruled  by  fate.^  But  in  other  extant  works  ^  he 
speaks  of  the  heavenly  bodies  as  visible  gods,  and  Lauren- 
tius  Lydus  attributes  astrological  treatises  to  him.* 
His  theory  In  one  passage  of  the  Apology  Apuleius  affirms  his  be- 

lief with  Plato  in  the  existence  of  certain  intermediate  be- 
ings or  powers  between  gods  and  men,  who  govern  all  div- 
inations and  the  miracles  of  the  magicians.^  In  the  treatise 
on  the  god  or  demon  of  Socrates  ®  he  repeats  this  thought 
and  tells  us  more  of  these  mediators  or  demons.  Their  na- 
tive element  is  the  air,  which  Apuleius  thought  extended  as 
far  as  the  moon,'^  just  as  Aristotle  ^  tells  of  animals  who 
live  in  fire  and  are  extinguished  with  it,  and  just  as  the  fifth 
element,  that  "divine  and  inviolable"  ether,  contains  the  di- 
vine bodies  of  the  stars.  With  the  superior  gods  the  demons 
have  immortality  in  common,  but  like  mortals  they  are  sub- 
ject to  passions  and  to  feeling  and  capable  of  reason.^  But 
their  bodies  are  very  light  and  like  clouds,  a  point  peculiar 
to  themselves. ^°  Since  both  Plutarch  and  Apuleius  wrote 
essays  on  the  demon  of  Socrates  and  both  derived,  or 
thought  that  they  derived,  their  theories  concerning  demons 
from  Plato,  it  is  interesting  to  note  some  divergences  be- 
tween their  accounts.  Apuleius  confines  them  to  the  atmos- 
phere beneath  the  moon  more  exclusively  than  Plutarch 
does;  unlike  Plutarch  he  represents  them  as  immortal,  not 
merely  long-lived;  and  he  has  more  to  say  about  the  sub- 


'  Cap.  97. 

"  Cap.  43. 

'Cap.  84. 

•  Cap.  6. 

*De    mundo,    cap.    i;    De    deo 

'■  De  deo  Socratis,  cap.  8. 

Socratis,  cap.  4. 

^  Hist.  Anim.,  V,_  19. 

*  De   mens.,  IV.,  7,  73 ;  De  os- 

^  De   deo   Socratis,   cap.    13. 

tent.,  3,  4,  7,  10,  44,  54. 

^'' Ibid.,  caps.  9-1'^ 

VII  APULEIUS  OF  MAD  AURA  241 

stance  of  their  bodies  and  less  concerning  their  relations 
with  disembodied  souls. 

Apuleius  would  have  been  a  well-known  name  in  the  Apuleius 
middle  ages,  if  only  indirectly  through  the  use  made  by  nr'ddle 
Augustine  in  The  City  of  God  ^  of  the  Metamorphoses  in  ages, 
describing  magic  and  of  the  De  dec  Socratis  in  discussing 
demons.^  He  also  speaks  of  Apuleius  in  three  of  his  letters,^ 
declaring  that  for  all  his  magic  arts  he  could  win  neither  a 
throne  nor  judicial  power.  Augustine  was  not  quite  sure 
whether  Apuleius  had  actually  been  transformed  into  an  ass 
or  not.  A  century  earlier  Lactantius  *  spoke  of  the  many 
marvels  remembered  of  Apuleius.  That  manuscripts  of  the 
Metamorphoses,  Apology  and  Florida  were  not  numerous 
until  after  the  twelfth  and  thirteenth  centuries  may  be  in- 
ferred from  the  fact  that  all  the  extant  manuscripts  seem  to 
be  derived  from  a  single  one  of  the  later  eleventh  century, 
written  in  a  Lombard  hand  and  perhaps  from  Monte  Cas- 
sino.^  The  article  on  Apuleius  in  Pauly  and  Wissowa  states 
that  the  best  manuscripts  of  his  other  works  are  an  eleventh 
century  codex  at  Brussels  and  a  twelfth  century  manuscript 
at  Munich,^  but  does  not  mention  a  twelfth  century  manu- 
script of  the  De  deo  Socratis  in  the  British  Museum.'^  An- 
other indication  that  in  the  twelfth  century  there  were  manu- 
scripts of  Apuleius  in  England  or  at  Chartres  and  Paris  is 
that  John  of  Salisbury  borrows  from  the  De  dogmate  Pla- 
tonis  in  his  De  migis  curialiiim}  In  the  earlier  middle  ages 
there  was  ascribed  to  Apuleius  a  work  on  herbs  of  which 
we  shall  treat  later. 

^  XVIII,   18.  395  A.D.  and  397  A.D.     G.  Huet, 

*VIII,    14-22.  "Le      roman       d'Apulee       etait-il 

*  Epistles  102,  136,  138,  in  Migne,  connu  au  moyen  age,"  Le  Moyen 
PL,  vol.  23.  Age   (1917),  44-52,  holds  that  the 

*  Diz'in.  Instit.,  V,  3.  Metamorphoses    was    not    known 

*  Codex  Laurentianus,  plut.  68,  directly  to  the  medieval  vernacu- 
2.  _  The  same  MS  contains  the  lar  romancers.  See  also  B.  Stum- 
Histories  and  Annals  (XI-XVI)  fall.  Das  Mdrchen  von  Amor  und 
of  Tacitus.  A  subscription  to  the  Psyche  in  Seinem  Fortleben,  Leip- 
ninth  book  of  the  Metamorphoses  zig,  1907. 

indicates  that  the  original  manu-  *  CLM  621. 

script    from    which    this    was    de-  '  Harleian   3969. 

rived  or  copied  was  produced  in  "  VII,  $• 


CHAPTER  VIII 


PHILOSTRATUS  S  LIFE  OF  APOLLONIUS  OF  TYANA 


Compared 

with 

Apuleius. 


Compared  with  Apuleius — Philostratus's  sources — Time  and  space 
covered — Philostratus's  audience — Object  of  the  Life — Apollonius 
charged  with  magic — A  confusion  of  terms — The  Magi  and  magic — 
Apollonius  and  the  Magi — Philostratus  on  wizards — Apollonius  and 
wizards — Quacks  and  old-wives — The  Brahmans — Marvels  of  the 
Brahmans — Magical  methods  of  the  Brahmans — Medicine  of  the 
Brahmans — Some  signs  of  astrology — Interest  in  natural  science — Nat- 
ural law  or  special  providence? — Cases  of  scepticism — Anecdotes  of 
animals — Dragons  of  India — Occult  virtues  of  gems — Absence  of  num- 
ber mysticism — Mantike  or  the  art  of  divination — Divining  power  of 
Apollonius — Dreams — Interpretation  of  omens — Animals  and  divina- 
tion— Divination  by  fire — Other  so-called  predictions — Apollonius  and 
the  demons — Not  all  demons  are  evil — Philostratus's  faith  in  demons 
— The  ghost  of  Achilles — Healing  the  sick  and  raising  the  dead — Other 
marvels — Golden  wrynecks  and  the  iunx — Why  named  iunx? — 
Apollonius  in  the  middle  ages. 

Some  fifty  years  after  the  birth  of  Apuleius  occurred 
that  of  Philostratus,  whose  career  and  interests  were  some- 
what similar,  although  he  came  from  the  Aegean  island  of 
Lemnos  instead  of  the  neighborhood  of  Carthage  and  wrote 
in  Greek  rather  than  Latin.  But  like  Apuleius  he  was  a 
student  of  rhetoric  and  went  first  to  Athens  and  then  to 
Rome,  The  resemblance  is  perhaps  closer  between  Apuleius 
and  Apollonius  of  Tyana,  whose  life  Philostratus  wrote  and 
of  whom  we  know  more  than  of  his  biographer.  Like  Apu- 
leius Apollonius  had  to  defend  himself  in  court  against  the 
accusation  of  magic,  and  Philostratus  gives  us  what  pur- 
ports to  be  his  apology  on  that  occasion.  Two  centuries 
afterwards  Augustine  in  one  of  his  letters  ^  names  Apollo- 
nius and  Apuleius  as  examples  of  men  who  were  addicted  to 
the  magic  art  and  who,  the  pagans  said,  performed  greater 

'  Ep.  136. 
242 


CHAP.  VIII  APOLLO  NWS  OF  TV  AN  A  243 

miracles  than  Christ  did.  A  century  before  Augustine 
Lactantius  states  ^  that  a  certain  philosopher  who  had 
"vomited  forth"  three  books  "against  the  Christian  religion 
and  name"  had  compared  the  miracles  of  Apollonius  favor- 
ably with  those  of  Christ;  Lactantius  marvels  that  he  did 
not  mention  Apuleius  as  well.  Like  Apuleius,  Apollonius 
was  a  man  of  broad  learning  who  traveled  widely  and  sought 
initiation  into  mysteries  and  cults.  Apuleius  was  a  Platonist ; 
Apollonius,  a  Pythagorean.  We  may  also  note  a  resemblance 
between  the  Metamorphoses  and  the  Life  of  Apollonius. 
Both  seem  to  elaborate  earlier  writings  and  both  have  much 
to  say  of  transformations,  wizards,  demons,  and  the  occult. 
The  Life  of  Apollonius  of  Tyana,  however,  must  be  taken 
more  seriously  than  the  Metamorphoses.  If  the  African's 
work  is  a  rhetorical  romance  embodying  a  certain  auto- 
biographical element,  a  Milesian  tale  to  which  personal  re- 
ligious experiences  are  annexed,  then  the  work  by  Philos- 
tratus  is  a  rhetorical  biography  with  a  tinge  of  romance  and 
a  good  deal  of  sermonizing. 

Philostratus  ^  composed  the  Life  of  Apollonius  about   Phiio- 
217  A.  D,  at  the  request  of  the  learned  wife  of  the  emperor   stratus's 

.     .  ^  ^  sources. 

Septimius  Severus,  to  whose  literary  circle  he  belonged. 
The  empress  had  come  into  possession  of  some  hitherto 
unknown  memoirs  of  Apollonius  by  a  certain  Damis  of 
Nineveh,  who  had  been  his  disciple  and  had  accompanied 
him  upon  many  of  his  travels.  Some  member  of  Damis's 
family  had  brought  these  documents  to  the  empress's  atten- 
tion. Some  scholars  incline  to  the  view  that  she  was  de- 
ceived by  an  impostor,  but  it  hardly  seems  that  there  would 
be  sufficient  profit  in  the  venture  to  induce  anyone  to  take 
the  pains  to  forge  such  memoirs.  Also  I  can  see  no  reason 
why  a  contemporary  of  Apollonius  should  not  have  said  and 
believed  everything  which  Philostratus  represents  Damis  as 
saying;  on  the  contrary  it  seems  to  me  just  what  would  be 

^Divin.  Instit.,  V,  2-3.  named     Philostratus     and     which 

^  works  should  be  assigned  to  each, 

Concerning      other      writers      see  Schmid   (1913)   608-20. 


244  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

said  by  a  naif,  gullible,  and  devoted  disciple,  who  was  in- 
clined to  exaggerate  the  abilities  and  achievements  of  his 
master  and  to  take  literally  everything  that  Apollonius  ut- 
tered ironically  or  figuratively.  Other  accounts  of  Apollo- 
nius were  already  in  existence  by  a  Maximus  of  Aegae, 
where  Apollonius  had  spent  part  of  his  life,  and  by  Moera- 
genes,  but  the  memoirs  of  Damis  seem  to  have  offered  much 
new  material.  Philostratus  accordingly  wrote  a  new  life 
based  largely  upon  Damis,  but  also  making  use  of  the  will 
and  epistles  of  Apollonius,  many  of  which  the  emperor  Ha- 
drian had  earlier  collected,  and  of  the  traditions  still  current 
in  the  cities  and  temples  which  Apollonius  had  frequented 
and  which  Philostratus  now  took  the  trouble  to  visit.  It 
has  sometimes  been  suggested,  chiefly  by  Christian  writers 
intent  upon  discrediting  the  career  of  Apollonius,  that  Phil- 
ostratus invented  Damis  and  his  memoirs.  But  Philostratus 
seems  straightforward  in  describing  the  pains  he  has  been  to 
in  preparing  the  Life,  and  certainly  is  more  explicit  and 
systematic  in  stating  his  sources  than  other  ancient  biogra- 
phers like  Plutarch  and  Suetonius  are.  He  appears  to  fol- 
low his  sources  rather  closely  and  not  to  invent  new  inci- 
dents, although  he  may,  like  Thucydides  and  other  ancient 
historians,  have  taken  liberties  with  the  speeches  and  argu- 
ments put  into  his  characters'  mouths.  And  through  the 
work,  despite  his  belief  in  demons  and  marvels,  he  now  and 
then  gives  evidence  of  a  moderate  and  sceptical  mind,  at 
least  for  his  times. 
Time  and  Apollonius  lived  in  the  first  century  of  our  era  and  died 

covered.  during  the  reign  of  Nerva  well  advanced  in  years.  It  is 
therefore  of  a  period  over  a  century  before  his  own  that  Phil- 
ostratus writes.  He  is  said  to  commit  a  number  of  errors 
in  history  and  geography,^  but  we  must  remember  that  mis- 
takes in  geography  were  a  failing  of  the  best  ancient  his- 

*  See  article  on  Apollonius  of  that  he  came  to  the  conclusion  that 
Tyana  in  Pauly-Wissowa.  Priaulx,  either  Apollonius  never  visited  In- 
The  Indian  Travels  of  Apollonius  dia,  or,  if  he  did,  that  Damis 
of  Tyana,  London,  1873,  p.  62,  "never  accompanied  him  but  fab- 
found  the  geography  of  Apollo-  ricated  the  journal  Philostratus 
nius's  Indian  travels  so  erroneous  speaks  of." 


VIII  APOLLONIUS  OF  TYANA  245 

torians  such  as  Polybius,  and  the  general  picture  drawn  of 
the  emperors  and  poHtics  of  Apollonius's  time  is  not  far 
wrong.  It  is  true  that  Philostratus  also  makes  use  of  tra- 
dition which  has  gradually  formed  since  the  death  of  Apol- 
lonius,  and  introduces  explanations  or  comments  of  his  own 
on  various  matters.  It  is,  however,  not  the  facts  either  of 
Apollonius's  career  or  of  his  times  that  concern  us  but  the 
beliefs  and  superstitions  which  we  find  in  Philostratus's 
Life  of  him.  Whether  these  are  of  the  first,  second,  or 
early  third  century  is  scarcely  necessary  or  possible  for  us 
to  distinguish.  If  Damis  records  them,  Philostratus  accepts 
them,  and  the  probability  is  that  they  apply  not  only  to  all 
three  centuries  but  to  a  long  period  before  and  after.  The 
territory  covered  in  the  Life  is  almost  as  extensive ;  it  ranges 
all  over  the  Roman  Empire,  alludes  occasionally  to  the  Celts 
and  Scythians,  and  opens  up  Ethiopia  and  India  ^  to  our  gaze. 
Apollonius  was  a  great  traveler  and  there  are  many  inter- 
esting and  informing  passages  concerning  ships,  sailing,  pi- 
lots, merchants  and  sea-trade.^ 

If  we  ask  further,  for  what  class  of  readers  was  the  philo^- 
Life  intended,  the  answer  is,  for  the  intellectual  and  learned.  aiKjJ^nce 
Apollonius  himself  was  distinctly  a  Hellene.  Philostratus 
represents  him  as  often  quoting  Homer  and  other  bygone 
Greek  authors,  or  mentioning  names  from  early  Greek  his- 
tory such  as  Lycurgus  and  Aristides.  One  of  his  aims  was 
to  restore  the  degenerate  Greek  cities  of  his  own  day  to  their 
ancient  morality.  Furthermore,  Apollonius  never  cared  for 
many  disciples,  and  neither  required  them  to  observe  all  the 
rules  of  life  which  he  himself  followed,  nor  admitted  them 
to  all  his  interviews  with  other  sages  and  his  initiations  into 
sacred  mysteries.  This  aloofness  of  the  sage  is  somewhat 
reflected  in  his  biographer.     The  Life  is  an  attempt  not  to 

^  Priaulx,  however,  regarded  its  Indian     merchants  —  Alexandria," 
statements     concerning     India     as  or  from  earHer  authors, 
such   as  might  have  been   "easily- 
collected    at   that   great    mart    for  ^III,  23,  35;   IV,  9,  32;  V,  20; 
Indian  commodities  and  resort  for  VI,  12,  16;  VII,  10,  12,  15-16. 


246 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Object  of 
the  Life. 


Apollonius 
charged 
with 
magic. 


popularize  the  teachings  of  Apollonius  but  to  justify  him 
before  the  learned  world. 

The  charge  had  been  frequently  made  that  Apollonius 
came  illegitimately  by  his  wisdom  and  acquired  it  violently 
by  magic.  Philostratus  would  restore  him  to  the  ranks  of 
true  philosophers  who  gained  wisdom  by  worthy  and  licit 
methods.  He  declares  that  he  was  not  a  wizard,  as  many 
suppose,  but  a  notable  Pythagorean,  a  man  of  broad  culture, 
an  intellectual  and  moral  teacher,  a  religious  ascetic  and  re- 
former, probably  even  a  prophet  of  divine  and  superhuman 
nature.  It  is  not  now  so  generally  held  by  Christian  writers 
as  it  used  to  be  that  Philostratus  wrote  the  Life  with  the 
Gospel  story  of  Christ  in  mind,  and  that  his  purpose  was  to 
imitate  or  to  parody  or  to  oppose  a  rival  narrative  to  the 
Christian  story  and  teaching.  At  no  point  in  the  Life  does 
Philostratus  betray  unmistakably  even  a  passing  acquaint- 
ance with  the  Gospels,  much  less  display  any  sign  of  animus 
against  them.  Moreover,  the  Christian  historian  and  apolo- 
gist, Eusebius,  who  lived  in  the  century  following  Philos- 
tratus and  was  familiar  with  his  Life  of  Apollonius,  in  writ- 
ing a  reply  to  a  treatise  in  which  Hierocles,  a  provincial  gov- 
ernor under  Diocletian,  had  compared  Apollonius  with 
Jesus,  distinctly  states  that  Hierocles  was  the  first  to  sug- 
gest such  an  idea.^  Such  similarities  then  as  may  exist  be- 
tween the  Life  and  the  Gospels  must  be  taken  as  examples  of 
beliefs  common  to  that  age. 

Apollonius  was  accused  of  sorcery  or  magic  during  his 
lifetime  by  the  rival  philosopher  Euphrates.  The  four 
books  on  Apollonius  written  by  Moeragenes  also  portrayed 
him  as  a  wizard ;  ^  and  Eusebius  in  his  reply  to  Hierocles 
ascribed  the  miracles  wrought  by  Apollonius  to  sorcery  and 
the  aid  of  evil  demons.^     Earlier  the  satirist  Lucian  de- 


^  See  the  treatise  of  Eusebius 
Against  Apollonius.  Lactantius 
(Divin.  Inst.,  V,  2-3)  probably 
had  reference  to  Hierocles  in 
speaking  of  a  philosopher  who 
had  written  three  books  against 
Christianity     and      declared     the 


miracles  of  Apollonius  as  wonder- 
ful as  those  of  Christ. 

'  So  Origen  says  (Against  Cel- 
sus,  VI,  41)  and  Philostratus  im- 
plies (I,  3). 

'  See  the  Against  Apollonius, 
caps.  31,  35. 


VIII  APOLLONIUS  OF  TYANA  247 

scribed  Alexander  the  pseudo-prophet  as  having  been  in  his 
youth  an  apprentice  to  "one  of  the  charlatans  who  deal  in 
magic  and  mystic  incantations,  ...  a  native  of  Tyana,  an 
associate  of  the  great  Apollonius,  and  acquainted  with  all 
his  heroics."  ^ 

In  defending  his  hero  against  these  charges  Philostratus  A  con- 
is  guilty  himself  both  of  some  ambiguous  use  of  terms  and  of  terms 
of  some  loose  thinking.  The  same  ambiguous  terminology, 
however,  will  be  found  in  other  discussions  of  magic.  In  a 
few  passages  Philostratus  denies  that  Apollonius  was  a 
/xd7os  but  much  oftener  exculpates  him  from  the  charge 
of  being  a  76:7s  or  yoijTrjs.  With  the  latter  word  or  words 
there  is  no  difficulty.  It  means  a  wizard,  sorcerer,  or  en- 
chanter, and  is  always  employed  in  a  sinister  or  disreputable 
sense.  With  the  term  fxayos  the  case  is  different,  as  with  the 
Latin  magus.  It  may  signify  an  evil  magician,  or  it  may 
refer  to  one  of  the  Magi  of  the  East,  who  are  generally  re- 
garded as  wise  and  good  men.  This  delicate  distinction, 
however,  is  not  easy  to  maintain  and  Philostratus  fails  to  do 
so,  while  Mr.  Conybeare  in  his  English  translation  -  makes 
confusion  worse  confounded  not  only  by  translating  nayos 
as  "wizard"  instead  of  "magician,"  but  by  sometimes  doing 
this  when  it  really  should  be  rendered  as  "one  of  the  Magi." 
It  may  also  be  noted  that  Philostratus  locates  the  Magi  in 
Babylonia  as  well  as  in  Persia. 

To  begin  with,  in  his  second  chapter  Philostratus  says  The  Magi 
that  some  consider  Apollonius  a  magician  "because  he  con-  ^"  magic 
sorted  with  the  Magi  of  the  Babylonians,  and  the  Brahmans 
of  the  Indians,  and  the  Gymnosophists  in  Egypt."  But  they 
are  wrong  in  this.  "For  Empedocles  and  Pythagoras  him- 
self and  Democritus,  although  they  associated  with  the  Magi 
and  spake  many  divine  utterances,  yet  did  not  stoop  to  the 
art"   (of  magic).     Plato,  too,  he  goes  on  to  say,  although 

*  'AXf^avSpos,  V  xPevSo/xavTis,    cap.  5.  text  in  the  recent  Loeb  Qassical 

In  the  passage  quoted  I  have  used  Library  edition,  both  racy  and  ac- 

Fowler's  translation.  curate,  and  have  employed  it  in  a 

"  In   other   respects,   however,    I  number   of    the   quotations   which 

have   usually    found   this   transla-  follow, 
tion,  which  accompanies  the  Greek 


248 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


he  visited  Egypt  and  its  priests  and  prophets,  was  never  re- 
garded as  a  magician.  In  this  passage,  then,  Philostratus 
closely  associates  the  Magi  with  the  magic  art,  and  I  am  not 
sure  whether  the  last  "Magi"  should  not  be  "magicians." 
On  the  other  hand  his  acquittal  of  Democritus  and  Pythag- 
oras from  the  charge  of  magic  does  not  agree  with  Pliny, 
who  ascribed  a  large  amount  of  magic  to  them  both. 

Apollonius  himself  evidently  did  not  regard  the  Magi 
whom  he  met  in  Babylon  and  Susa  as  evil  magicians.  One 
of  the  chief  aims  of  his  scheme  of  oriental  travel  "was  to 
acquaint  himself  thoroughly  with  their  lore."  He  wished  to 
discover  whether  they  were  wise  in  divine  things,  as  they 
were  said  to  be.^  Sacrifices  and  religious  rites  were  per- 
formed under  their  supervision.^  Apollonius  did  not  permit 
Damis  to  accompany  him  when  he  visited  the  Magi  at  noon 
and  again  about  midnight  and  conversed  with  them.^  But 
Apollonius  himself  said  that  he  learned  some  things  from 
them  and  taught  them  some  things ;  he  told  Damis  that  they 
were  "wise  men,  but  not  in  all  respects" ;  on  leaving  their 
country  he  asked  the  king  to  give  the  presents  which  the 
monarch  had  intended  for  Apollonius  himself  to  the  Magi, 
whom  he  described  then  as  "men  who  both  are  wise  and 
wholly  devoted  to  you."  * 

Quite  different  is  the  attitude  towards  witchcraft  an*! 
wizards  of  both  Apollonius  and  his  biographer.  In  the  opin- 
ion of  Philostratus  wizards  are  of  all  men  most  wretched.^ 
They  try  to  violate  nature  and  to  overcome  fate  by  such 
methods  as  inquisition  of  spirits,  barbaric  sacrifices,  incan- 
tations and  besmearings.  Simple-minded  folk  attribute 
great  powers  to  them ;  and  athletes  desirous  of  winning  vic- 
tories, shopkeepers  intent  upon  success  in  business  ventures, 
and  lovers  in  especial  are  continually  resorting  to  them  and 
apparently  never  lose  faith  in  them  despite  repeated  failures, 
despite  occasional  exposure  or  ridicule  of  their  methods  in 


*  I,  32. 
"1,29. 
*I.  26. 


*  I,  40. 
»V,  12. 


VIII  APOLLONIUS  OF  TYANA  249 

books  and  writing,  and  despite  the  condemnation  of  witch- 
craft both  by  law  and  nature.^  Apollonius  was  certainly 
no  wizard,  argues  Philostratus,  for  he  never  opposed  the 
Fates  but  only  predicted  what  they  would  bring  to  pass,  and 
he  acquired  this  foreknowledge  not  by  sorcery  but  by  divine 
revelation.^ 

Nevertheless  Apollonius  is  frequently  accused  of  being  Apollonius 
a  wizard  by  others  in  the  pages  of  Philostratus.  At  Athens  ^i2ar(js 
he  was  refused  initiation  into  the  mysteries  on  this  ground,^ 
and  at  Lebadea  the  priests  wished  to  exclude  him  from  the 
oracular  cave  of  Trophonius  for  the  same  reason.^  When 
the  dogs  guarding  the  temple  of  Dictynna  in  Crete  fawned 
upon  him  instead  of  barking  at  his  approach,  the  guardians 
of  the  shrine  arrested  him  as  a  wizard  and  would-be  temple 
robber  who  had  bewitched  the  dogs  by  something  that  he 
had  given  them  to  eat.^  Apollonius  also  had  to  defend  him- 
self against  the  accusation  of  witchcraft  in  his  hearing  or 
trial  before  Domitian.^  He  then  denied  that  one  is  a  wizard 
merely  because  one  has  prescience,  or  that  wearing  linen  gar- 
ments proves  one  a  sorcerer.  Wizards  shun  the  shrines  and 
temples  of  the  gods ;  they  make  use  of  trenches  dug  in  the 
earth  and  invoke  the  gods  of  the  lower  world.  They  are 
greedy  for  gain  and  pseudo-philosophers.  They  possess  no 
true  science,  depending  for  success  in  their  art  upon  the 
stupidity  of  their  dupes  and  devotees.  They  imagine  what 
does  not  exist  and  disbelieve  the  truth.  They  work  their 
sorcery  by  night  and  in  darkness  when  those  employing  them 
cannot  see  or  hear  well.  Apollonius  himself  was  accused 
to  Domitian  of  having  sacrificed  an  Arcadian  boy  at  night 
and  consulted  his  entrails  with  Nerva  in  order  to  determine 
the  latter's  prospects  of  becoming  emperor."^  When  before 
his  trial  Domitian  was  about  to  put  Apollonius  in  fetters, 
the  sage  proposed  the  dilemma  that  if  he  were  a  wizard  he 
could  not  be  kept  in  bonds,  or  that  if  Domitian  were  able 


'VII,  39.  "VIII,  30. 

Tv/'i8.  'VIII,  7. 

*VIII,  19.  "VII,  20. 


250 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap^ 


Quacks 
and  old- 
wives. 


The 
Brahmans. 


to  fetter  him,  he  was  obviously  no  wizard.^  This  need 
not  imply,  however,  that  Apollonius  believed  that  wizards 
really  could  free  themselves,  for  he  was  at  times  ironical.  If 
so,  Domitian  replied  in  kind  by  assuring  him  that  he  would 
at  least  keep  him  in  fetters  until  he  transformed  himself  into 
water  or  a  wild  beast  or  a  tree. 

Closely  akin  to  the  goetes  or  wizards  are  the  old  hags  and 
quack-doctors  who  offer  one  Indian  spices  or  boxes  sup- 
posed to  contain  bits  of  stone  taken  from  the  moon,  stars, 
or  depths  of  earth.^  Likewise  the  divining  old-wives  who 
go  about  with  sieves  in  their  hands  and  pretend  by  means 
of  their  divination  to  heal  sick  animals  for  shepherds  and 
cowherds.^  We  also  read  that  Apollonius  expelled  from 
the  cities  along  the  Hellespont  various  Egyptians  and 
Chaldeans  who  were  collecting  money  on  the  pretense  of 
offering  sacrifices  to  avert  the  earthquakes  which  were  then 
occurring.'* 

We  have  heard  Philostratus  mention  the  Brahmans  of 
India  in  the  same  breath  with  the  Magi  of  Persia  and  imply 
that  Apollonius's  association  with  them  contributed  to  his 
reputation  as  a  magician.^  In  another  passage  ^  Philostratus 
places  goetes  and  Brahmans  in  unfortunate  juxtaposition, 
and,  immediately  after  condemning  the  wizards  and  defend- 
ing Apollonius  from  the  charge  of  sorcery,  goes  on  to  say 
that  when  he  saw  the  automatic  tripods  and  cup-bearers  of 
the  Indians,  he  did  not  ask  how  they  were  operated.  "He 
applauded  them,  it  is  true,  but  did  not  think  fit  to  imitate 
them."  But  of  course  Apollonius  should  not  even  have  ap- 
plauded these  automatons,  which  set  food  and  poured  wine 
before  the  guests  of  the  Brahmans,  if  they  were  the  con- 
trivances of  wizards.  And  in  another  passage,'^  where  he 
defends  the  signs  and  wonders  wrought  by  the  Brahmans 
against  the  aspersions  cast  upon  them  by  the  Gymnosophists 
of  Ethiopia,  Apollonius  explains  their  practice  of  levitation 


'VII,  34. 
'VII,  39. 
"VI,  II ;  III,  43. 
'VI,  41. 


'I,   2. 

'V,     12. 

VI,  II. 


VIII  APOLLONWS  OF  TYANA  251 

as  an  act  of  worship  and  communion  with  the  sun  god,  and 
hence  far  removed  from  the  rites  performed  in  deep  trenches 
and  hollows  of  the  earth  to  the  gods  of  the  lower  world 
which  we  have  heard  him  mention  before  as  a  practice  char- 
acteristic of  wizards. 

Nevertheless  the  feats  ascribed  to  the  Brahmans  are  cer-  Marvels 
tainly  sufficiently  akin  to  magic  to  excuse  Philostratus  for  Brahmans. 
mentioning  them  along  with  the  Magi  and  wizards  and  to 
justify  us  in  considering  them.  Indeed,  modern  scholarship 
informs  us  that  in  the  Vedic  texts  the  word  "brahman"  in 
the  neuter  means  a  "charm,  rite,  formulary,  prayer,"  and 
"that  the  caste  of  the  Brahmans  is  nothing  but  the  men  who 
have  hrdhman  or  magic  power. ^  In  marked  contrast  to  the 
taciturnity  of  Apollonius  as  to  his  interviews  with  the  Magi 
of  Babylon  and  Susa  is  the  long  account  repeated  by  Phi- 
lostratus from  Damis  of  the  sayings  and  doings  of  the  sages 
of  India.  As  for  Apollonius  himself,  "he  was  always  re- 
counting to  everyone  what  the  Indians  said  and  did."  ^ 
They  knew  that  he  was  approaching  when  he  was  yet  afar 
off  and  sent  a  messenger  who  greeted  him  by  name.^  lar- 
chas,  their  chief,  also  knew  that  Apollonius  had  a  letter  for 
him  and  that  a  delta  was  missing  in  it,  and  he  told  Apol- 
lonius many  events  of  his  past  life.  "We  see,  O  Apollo- 
nius," he  said,  "the  signs  of  the  soul,  tracing  them  by  a 
myriad  symbols."  ^  The  Brahmans  lived  in  a  castle  con- 
cealed by  clouds,  where  they  rendered  themselves  invisible 
at  will.  The  rocks  along  the  path  up  to  their  abode  were 
still  marked  by  the  cloven  feet,  beards,  faces,  and  backs  of 
the  Pans  who  had  tried  to  scale  the  height  under  the  lead- 
ership of  Dionysus  and  Heracles,  but  had  been  hurled  down 
headlong.^     Here  too  was  a  well  for  testing  oaths,  a  purify- 

*J.  E.  Harrison,  Themis,  Cam-  from    the    sacrificial    lore    of    the 

bridge,  1912,  p.  72.     "The  Buddha  Vedas :    "E.   B.   Havell,  A   Hand- 

himself    condemned    as    worthless  book  of  Indian  Art,  1920,  p.  6,  and 

the  whole  system  of  Vedic  sacri-  see  p.  32  for  the  birth  of  Buddha 

fices,  including  in  his  ban  astrol-  under  the  sign  Taurus, 

ogy,  divination,  spells,  omens,  and  ^VI,    10. 

witchcraft;     but    in     the    earliest  'III,  12. 

Buddhist  stupas  known  to  us,  the  *III,   16. 

symbolism    is    entirely    borrowed  "  III,   13. 


252 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


ing  fire,  and  the  jars  in  which  the  winds  and  rain  were  bot- 
tled up. 
Magical  When  the  messenger  of  the  Brahmans  greeted  Apollonius 

of^\he^^  by  name,  the  latter  remarked  to  the  astounded  Damis,  "We 
Brahmans.  have  Come  to  men  who  are  wise  without  art  (drexvccs),  for 
they  seem  to  have  the  gift  of  foreknowledge."  ^  As  a  mat- 
ter of  fact,  however,  most  of  the  subsequent  wonders 
wrought  by  the  Brahmans  were  not  performed  without  the 
use  of  paraphernalia  and  rites  very  similar  to  those  of  magic. 
Each  Brahman  carries  a  staff — or  magic  wand — and  wears 
a  ring,  which  are  both  prized  for  their  occult  virtue  by  which 
the  Brahmans  can  accomplish  anything  they  wish.^  They 
clothe  themselves  in  sacred  garments  made  of  "a.  wool  that 
springs  wild  from  the  ground"  (cotton?)  and  which  the 
earth  will  not  permit  anyone  else  to  pluck.  larchas  also 
showed  Apollonius  and  Damis  a  marvelous  stone  called  Pan- 
tarhe,  which  attracted  and  bound  other  stones  to  itself  and 
which,  although  only  the  size  of  his  finger-nail  and  formed 
in  earth  four  fathoms  deep,  had  such  virtue  that  it  broke 
the  earth  open.^  But  it  required  great  skill  to  secure  this 
gem.  "We  only,"  said  the  Brahman,  "can  obtain  this  pan- 
tarhe,  partly  by  doing  things  and  partly  by  saying  things," 
in  other  words  by  incantations  and  magical  operations.  Be- 
fore performing  their  rite  of  levitation  tTiey  bathed  and 
anointed  themselves  with  a  certain  drug.  "Then  they  stood 
like  a  chorus  with  larchas  as  leader  and  with  their  rods  up- 
lifted struck  the  earth,  which  heaving  like  the  sea-wave 
raised  them  up  in  the  air  two  cubits  high."  *  The  metallic 
tripods  and  cup-bearers  which  served  the  king  of  the  coun- 
try when  he  came  to  visit  the  Brahmans  appeared  from  no- 
where laden  with  food  and  wine  exactly  as  if  by  magic.^ 

The  medical  practice,  if  we  may  so  call  it,  of  the  Brah- 
mans was  tinged,  to  say  the  least,  with  magic.  A  dislocated 
hip,  indeed,  they  appear  to  have  cured  by  massage,  and  a 


*  III,  12.  Rut  perhaps  the  trans- 
lation should  be,  "men  who  are  ex- 
ceedingly wise." 

'HI,   IS. 


=■111,  46-47. 
*III,   17. 
Mil,  27. 


VIII  APOLLONIUS  OF  TYANA  253 

blind  man  and  a  paralytic  are  healed  by  unspecified  methods.^ 
But  a  boy  is  cured  of  inherited  alcoholism  by  chewing  owl's 
eggs  that  have  been  boiled;  a  woman  who  complains  that 
her  sixteen-year-old  son  has  for  two  years  been  vexed  by 
a  demon  is  sent  away  with  a  letter  full  of  threats  or  incan- 
tations to  employ  against  the  spirit;  and  another  woman's 
sufferings  in  childbirth  are  prevented  by  directing  her  hus- 
band to  enter  her  chamber  with  a  live  hare  concealed  in  his 
bosom  and  to  release  the  hare  after  he  has  walked  around 
his  wife  once.  larchas,  indeed,  attributed  the  origin  of 
medicine  to  divination  or  divine  revelation.^  His  theory 
was  that  Asclepius,  as  the  son  of  Apollo,  learned  by  oracles 
what  drugs  to  employ  for  the  different  diseases,  in  what 
amounts  to  mix  the  drugs,  what  the  antidotes  for  poisons 
were,  and  how  to  use  even  poisons  as  remedies.  This  last 
especially  he  affirmed  that  no  one  would  dare  attempt  with- 
out foreknowledge. 

The  Brahmans  seem  to  have  made  some  use  of  astrology  Some 
in  working  their  feats  of  magic.  Damis  at  any  rate  said  that  astrology 
when  Apollonius  bade  farewell  to  the  sages,  larchas  made 
him  a  present  of  seven  rings  named  after  the  planets,  which 
he  wore  in  turn  upon  the  appropriate  days  of  the  week.^ 
Perhaps,  too,  the  seven  swords  of  adamant  which  larchas 
had  rediscovered  as  a  child  had  some  connection  with  the 
planets.^    Moeragenes  ascribed  four  books  on  foretelling  the  .^t^ 

future  by  the  stars  to  Apollonius  himself,  but  Philostratus  v/sf 

was  unable  to  find  any  such  work  by  Apollonius  extant  in  .;.^ 

his  day.^     And  unless  it  be  an  allusion  to  Chaldeans  which  ' 

we  have  already  noted,  there  is  no  further  mention  of  as- 
trology in  Philostratus's  Life — a  rather  remarkable  fact  con- 
sidering that  he  wrote  for  the  court  of  Septimius  Severus, 
the  builder  of  the  Septizonium. 

The  philosopher  Euphrates,  who  is  represented  by  Philos-  Interest 

tratus  as  jealous  of  Apollonius,  once  advised  the  emperor  science 

Vespasian,  when  Apollonius  was  present,  to  embrace  natural 

^III,  38-40.  "Ill,  21. 

Mil,  44. 

'Ill,  41.  mi,  41. 


254  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

philosophy — or  a  philosophy  in  accordance  with  natural  law 
— but  to  beware  of  philosophers  who  pretended  to  have 
secret  intercourse  with  the  gods.^  There  was  justification 
in  the  latter  charge  against  Apollonius,  but  it  should  not  be 
assumed  that  his  mysticism  rendered  him  unfavorable  to 
natural  science.  On  the  contrary  he  is  frequently  represented 
by  Philostratus  as  whiling  away  the  time  along  the  road  by 
discussing  with  Damis  such  natural  problems  as  the  delta  of 
the  Nile  or  the  tides  at  the  mouth  of  the  Guadalquivir.  He 
was  especially  interested  in  the  habits  of  animals  and  the 
properties  of  gems.  Vespasian  was  fond  of  listening  to 
"his  graphic  stories  of  the  rivers  of  India  and  the  animals" 
of  that  country,  as  well  as  to  "his  statements  of  what  the 
gods  revealed  concerning  the  empire."  ^  Some  of  the  ques- 
tions which  Apollonius  put  to  the  Brahmans  concerned  na- 
ture.^ He  asked  of  what  the  world  was  composed,  and  when 
they  said,  "Of  elements,"  he  asked  if  there  were  four.  They 
believed,  however,  in  a  fifth  element,  ether,  from  which  the 
gods  had  been  generated  and  which  they  breathe  as  men 
breathe  air.  They  also  regarded  the  universe  as  a  living 
animal.  He  further  inquired  of  them  whether  land  or  sea 
predominated  on  the  earth's  surface,*  and  this  same  attitude 
of  scientific  inquiry  and  of  curiosity  about  natural  forces 
and  objects  is  frequently  met  in  the  Life. 

Apollonius  believed,  as  we  shall  see,  in  omens  and  por- 
tents, and  interpreted  an  earthquake  at  Antioch  as  a  divine 
warning  to  the  inhabitants.^  The  Brahman  sages,  moreover, 
regarded  prolonged  drought  as  a  punishment  visited  by  the 
world  soul  upon  human  sinfulness.^  On  the  other  hand, 
Apollonius  gave  a  natural  explanation  of  volcanoes  and  de- 
nied the  myths  concerning  Enceladus  being  imprisoned  un- 
der Mount  Aetna  and  the  battle  of  the  gods  and  giants.'^ 
And  in  the  case  of  the  earthquake  the  people  had  already 
accepted  it  as  a  portent  and  were  praying  in  terror,  when 

'V,  37-  'VI,  38. 

'V,  2,7.  eTTT     ,. 

•Ill,  34.  '  ^^' 

Mil,  7,7.  ^V.  17. 


VIII  APOLLONIUS  OF  TYANA  255 

Apollonius  took  the  opportunity  to  warn  them  to  cease  from 
their  civil  factions.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  both  Apollonius 
and  Philostratus  appear  to  regard  portents  as  an  extraordi- 
nary sort  of  natural  phenomena.  A  knowledge  of  natural 
science  helps  in  recognizing  them  and  in  interpreting  them. 
When  a  lioness  of  enormous  size  with  eight  whelps  in  her  is 
slain  by  hunters,  Apollonius  at  once  recognizes  the  event  as 
portentous  because  as  a  rule  lionesses  have  whelps  only 
thrice  and  only  three  of  them  on  the  first  occasion,  two  in 
the  second  litter,  and  finally  but  a  single  whelp,  "but  I  be- 
lieve a  very  big  one  and  preternaturally  fierce."  ^  Here 
Apollonius  is  not  in  strict  agreement  with  Pliny  and  Aris- 
totle ^  who  say  that  the  lioness  produces  five  whelps  at  the 
first  birth  and  one  less  every  succeeding  year. 

The  scepticism  of  Apollonius  concerning  the  Aetna  Cases  of 
myth  is  not  an  isolated  instance.  At  Sardis  he  ridiculed  the  scepticism 
notion  that  trees  could  be  older  than  earth,^  and  he  was  one 
of  the  few  ancients  to  question  the  swan's  song.*  He  de- 
nied "the  silly  story  that  the  young  of  vipers  are  brought  into 
the  world  without  mothers"  as  "consistent  neither  with  na- 
ture nor  experience,"  ^  and  also  the  tale  that  the  whelps  of 
the  lioness  claw  their  way  out  into  the  world.®  In  India 
Apollonius  saw  a  wild  ass  or  unicorn  from  whose  single 
horn  a  magic  drinking  horn  was  made.'  A  draught  from 
this  horn  was  supposed  to  protect  one  for  that  day  from  dis- 
ease, wounds,  fire,  or  poison,  and  on  that  account  the  king 

*I,  22.  sonitum  rauci  per  stagna  loquacia 

'  NH,    VIII,    17;    Hist.    Anim.,  cygni.     This  concrete  explanation 

VI,  31.  is   quite  inadequate;   it  is   beyond 

^VI,  37.  a  doubt  that  the  swan's  song  (Hke 

*The    ancient    authorities,    pro  the    halcyon's)     veiled,    and    still 

and  con,   will   be   found   listed  in  hides,    some   mystical    allusion." 

D.    W.    Thompson,    Glossary    of  *  II,  14. 

Greek   Birds,    106-107.     He   adds:  "I,    22.      Pliny,    NH,    VIII,    17, 

"Modern    naturalists    accept    the  repeats  a  slightly  different  popular 

story  of  the  singing  swans,  assert-  notion  that  the  lioness   tears   her 

ing  that  though  the  common  swan  womb  with  her  claws  and  so  can 

cannot  sing,  yet  the  Whooper  or  bear  but  once ;   against  this  view 

whistling  swan  does  so.     It  is  cer-  he  cites  Aristotle's  statement  that 

tain  that  the  Whooper  sings,  for  the    lioness    bears    five    times,    as 

many  ornithologists  state  the  fact,  described  above, 
but  I  do  not  think  that  it  can  sing  '  III,  2. 

very  well ;  at  the  very  best,  dant 


of  animals. 


256  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

alone  was  permitted  to  hunt  the  animal  and  to  drink  from 
the  horn.  When  Damis  asked  Apollonius  if  he  credited  this 
story,  the  sage  ironically  replied  that  he  would  believe  it 
if  he  found  the  king  of  the  country  to  be  immortal. 
Either,  however,  the  scepticism  of  Apollonius,  as  was  the 
case  with  so  many  other  ancients  and  medieval  men,  was 
sporadic  and  inconsistent,  or  it  came  to  be  overlaid  with  the 
credulity  of  Damis  and  Philostratus,  as  the  following  ex- 
ample suggests.  larchas  told  Damis  and  Apollonius  flatly 
that  the  races  described  by  Scylax  of  men  with  long  heads 
or  huge  feet  with  which  they  were  said  to  shade  themselves 
did  not  exist  in  India  or  anywhere  else;  yet  in  a  later  book 
Philostratus  states  that  the  shadow- footed  people  are  a 
tribe  in  Ethiopia.^ 
Anecdotes  At  any  rate  the  marvels  of  India  are  more  frequently 

credited  than  criticized  in  the  Life  by  Philostratus,  and  the 
same  holds  true  of  the  extraordinary  conduct  and  well-nigh 
human  intelligence  attributed  to  animals.  Especially  delight- 
ful reading  are  six  chapters  on  the  remarkable  sagacity  of 
elephants  and  their  love  for  mankind.^  On  this  point,  as  by 
Pliny,  use  is  made  of  the  work  of  Juba.  We  read  again  of 
sick  lions  eating  apes,  of  the  lioness's  love  affair  with  the 
panther,  of  the  fondness  of  leopards  for  the  fragrant  gum 
of  a  certain  tree  and  of  goats  for  the  cinnamon  tree ;  of  apes 
who  are  made  to  collect  pepper  for  men  by  appealing  to  their 
instinct  towards  mimicry ;  ^  and  of  the  tiger,  whose  loins 
alone  are  eaten  by  the  Indians.  "For  they  decline  to  eat  the 
other  parts  of  this  animal,  because  they  say  that  as  soon  as 
it  is  born  it  lifts  up  its  front  paws  to  the  rising  sun."  *  In 
the  river  Hyphasis  is  a  creature  like  a  white  worm  which 
yields  when  melted  down  a  fat  or  oil  that  once  set  afire  can- 
not be  extinguished  and  which  the  king  uses  to  burn  walls 

'III,  47;  VI,  25.    Scylax  was  a  sius,    Periplus    Scylacis    Caryan- 

Persian     admiral     under     Darius  densis,  1639),  but  some  date  it  as 

who  traveled  to  India  and  wrote  early  as  the  fourth  century  B.C. 

an  account  of  his  voyages.     The  ^11,  11-16. 

work  extant  under  his  name  is  of  *  II,  2;  III,  4. 

doubtful   authorship    (Isaac  Vos-  *  II,  28. 


viii  APOLLONIUS  OF  TYANA  257 

and  capture  cities.^  In  India  are  griffins  who  quarry  gold 
with  their  powerful  beaks,  and  the  luminous  phoenix  with  its 
nest  of  spices  and  swan-like  funeral  song.^ 

Especially  remarkable  are  the  snakes  or  dragons  with  Dragons 
which  all  India  is  filled  and  which  often  are  of  enormous  °  "  *^ 
size,  thirty  or  even  seventy  cubits  long.^  Those  found  in 
the  marshes  are  sluggish  and  have  no  crests ;  but  those  on 
the  hills  and  ridges  move  faster  than  the  swiftest  rivers  and 
have  both  beards  and  crests.*  Those  in  the  plain  engage  in 
combats  with  elephants  which  terminate  fatally  for  both 
parties  as  we  have  already  learned  from  Pliny.^  The  moun- 
tain dragons  have  bushy  beards,  fiery  crests,  golden  scales, 
and  a  ferocious  glance.®  They  burrow  into  the  earth,  mak- 
ing a  noise  like  clashing  brass,  or  go  hissing  down  to  the 
shore  and  swim  far  out  to  sea.  Terrifying  as  they  are,  the 
Indians  charm  them  by  showing  them  golden  characters  em- 
broidered on  a  cloak  of  scarlet  and  by  incantations  of  a  se- 
cret wisdom.  They  eat  the  dragon's  heart  and  liver  in  order 
to  be  able  to  understand  the  language  and  thoughts  of  ani- 
mals.''^ 

The  dragons,  however,  are  prized  more  for  the  precious  Occult 

stones  in  their  heads,  which  the  Indians  quickly  cut  off  as  virtues  of 

.  ^      ,    ■'  gems, 

soon  as  they  have  bewitched  them.     The  pupils  of  the  eyes  ,,, 

of  the  hill  dragons  are  a  fiery  stone  possessing  irresistible 
virtue  for  many  occult  purposes,^  while  in  the  heads  of  the 
mountain  dragons  are  many  brilliant  stones  of  flashing 
colors  which  exert  occult  virtue  if  set  in  a  ring,  "and  they 
say  that  Gyges  had  such  a  ring."  ^  But  there  are  many  mar- 
velous stones  outside  the  heads  of  dragons.  "Who  does  not 
know  the  habits  of  birds,"  says  Apollonius  to  Damis  in  one 
of  his  disquisitions  upon  natural  phenomena,^"  "and  that 
eagles  and  storks  will  not  build  their  nests  without  placing  in 
them,  the  one  the  stone  aetites,  and  the  other  the  lychnites. 


"■III,  I.    Greek  fire? 

"Ill,  a 

*III,  48-9. 

'III,  9. 

mi,  6;  II,  17. 

*in,  7. 

Mil,  7. 

'Ill,  8. 

=  NH,  VIII,   II. 

"11, 14. 

258  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

as  aids  in  hatching  and  to  drive  snakes  away?''  On  parting 
from  the  Indian  king  Phraotes,  Apollonius  as  usual  refused 
to  accept  money  presents  but  picked  up  one  of  the  gems  that 
were  offered  him  with  the  exclamation,  "O  rare  stone,  how 
opportunely  and  providentially  have  I  found  you !"  ^  Phi- 
lostratus  supposes  that  he  detected  some  occult  and  divine 
power  in  this  particular  stone.  The  Brahmans  had  gems 
so  huge  that  from  one  of  them  a  goblet  could  be  carved  large 
enough  to  slake  the  thirst  of  four  men  in  midsummer,  but 
in  this  case  nothing  is  said  of  occult  virtue.^  The  Brahman 
larchas  felt  sure  that  he  was  the  reincarnation  of  the  hero 
Ganges,  son  of  the  river  Ganges,  because  as  a  mere  child  he 
knew  where  to  dig  for  the  seven  swords  of  adamant  which 
Ganges  had  fixed  in  the  earth. ^  Presumably  these  were 
magic  swords  and  their  virtue  in  part  due  to  the  stone  ada- 
mant of  which  they  were  made.  Less  is  said  in  the  Life  of  the 
virtues  of  herbs  than  of  gems,  but  the  Indians  made  a  nup- 
tial ointment  or  love-charm  from  balm  distilled  from  trees,^ 
and  drugs  and  poisons  are  mentioned  more  than  once,  man- 
dragora  being  described  as  a  soporific  drug  rather  than  a 
deadly  poison.^ 
Absence  Considering  that  Apollonius  was  a  Pythagorean,  there  is 

of  number  surprisingly  little  said  concerning  perfect  numbers  and  their 
mystic  significance.  Aside  from  the  seven  rings  and  seven 
swords  already  mentioned,  about  the  only  instance  is  the 
question  asked  by  Apollonius  whether  eighteen,  the  number 
of  the  Brahman  sages  at  the  time  of  his  visit,  had  any  espe- 
cial importance.^  He  remarked  that  eighteen  was  not  a 
square,  nor  a  number  usually  held  in  esteem  and  honor  like 
ten,  twelve,  and  sixteen.  The  Brahmans  agreed  that  there 
was  no  particular  significance  in  eighteen,  and  further  in- 
formed him  that  they  maintained  no  fixed  number  of  mem- 
bers but  had  varied  from  only  one  to  as  many  as  seventy 
according  to  the  available  supply  of  worthy  men, 

^11,  40.  'in,  I. 

"111,27.  » VIII,  7. 

'111,21.  "111,30. 


VIII  APOLLONIUS  OF  TYANA  259 

If  Philostratus  denies  that  Apollonius  was  a  magician,  Mantike 
he  does  depict  him  as  endowed  with  prophetic  gifts,  with  art*of 
power  over  demons,  and  with  "secret  wisdom."  He  rather  divination, 
likes  to  give  the  impression  that  the  sage  foretold  things 
by  innate  prophetic  gift  or  divine  inspiration,  but  even 
navTLKT]  or  the  art  of  divination  is  not  condemned  as  yorjTela 
or  witchcraft  was.  larchas  the  Brahman  says  that  those  who 
delight  in  mantike  become  divine  thereby  and  contribute  to 
the  safety  of  mankind.^  Apollonius  himself,  when  condemn- 
ing wizards  as  pseudo-wise,  made  the  reservation  that  man- 
tike, if  true  in  its  predictions,  was  not  a  pseudo-science,  al- 
though he  professed  ignorance  whether  it  could  be  called  an 
art  or  not.^  He  denied  that  he  practiced  it,  when  he  was  ex- 
amined by  Tigellinus,  the  favorite  of  Nero,  who  was  perse- 
cuting philosophers  on  the  ground  that  they  were  addicted 
to  mantike.^  His  accusers  before  Domitian  again  adduced 
his  alleged  practice  of  divination  as  evidence  that  he  was  a 
wizard.^ 

If  Apollonius  practiced  neither  wizardry  nor  mantike.  Divining 
the  question  arises  how  he  was  able  to  foretell  the  future,   of^pol- 
In  his  trial  before  Domitian  he  did  not  attempt  to  deny  that  lon»us. 
he  had  predicted  the  plague  at  Ephesus,  but  attributed  his 
"sense  of  the  coming  disaster"  to  his  abstemious  diet,  which 
kept  his  senses  clear  and  enabled  him  to  see  as  in  an  un- 
clouded mirror  "all  that  is  happening  or  about  to  occur."  ^ 
For  he  was  credited  with  knowledge  of  distant  events  the 
moment  they  occurred  as  well  as  with  foreknowledge  of  the 
future.    Thus  at  Ephesus  he  was  aware  of  the  assassination 
of  Domitian  at  Rome ;  and  at  Tarsus,  although  he  arrived  af- 
ter the  incident  had  occurred,  he  was  able  to  describe  and  to 
find  the  mad  dog  by  whom  a  boy  had  been  bitten.^    larchas 
told  Apollonius  that  health  and  purity  were  requisite  for 

*  III,  42.  porary  of  Philostratus,  also  states 

"VIII,  7.  that     Apollonius     announced     the 

'  IV,  44.  assassination     of     Domitian     and 

*VIII,  7.  even  named  the  assassin  in  Ephe- 

'VIII,  7.  sus  on  the  very  day  that  the  event 

*_VIII,    26;  VI,    43.      The    his-       occurred   at    Rome.     His   account 

torian,    Dio  Cassius,    a    contem-       differs    too    much    from    that    by 


26o 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Dreams. 


Interpreta- 
tion of 
omens. 


divination;  ^  and  Apollonius  in  turn,  in  recounting  his  life 
story  to  the  naked  sages  of  Egypt,  represented  the  Pythago- 
rean philosophy  as  appearing  before  him  and  promising, 
"And  when  you  are  pure,  I  will  grant  you  the  faculty  of 
foreknowledge."  ^ 

Apollonius  often  was  warned  by  dreams.  When  he 
dreamt  of  fish  who  were  cast  gasping  upon  dry  land  and 
who  appealed  for  succour  to  a  dolphin  swimming  by,  he 
knew  that  he  ought  to  visit  and  restore  the  graves  and  assist 
the  descendants  of  the  Eretrians  whom  Darius  had  taken 
captive  to  the  Persian  kingdom  over  five  centuries  before.^ 
Another  dream  he  interpreted  as  a  command  to  visit  Crete.* 
In  defending  his  linen  apparel  before  Domitian  he  declared, 
"It  is  a  pure  substance  under  which  to  sleep  at  night,  for  to 
those  who  live  as  I  do  dreams  bring  the  truest  of  their  reve- 
lations." ^  He  was  not  the  only  dreamer  of  the  time,  how- 
ever, and  when  some  of  his  followers  were  afraid  to  accom- 
pany him  to  Rome  in  Nero's  reign,  they  made  warning 
dreams  their  excuse  for  deserting  him.^ 

It  has  been  seen  that  Apollonius  not  only  had  prophetic 
dreams  but  was  skilful  in  interpreting  them.  He  was  equally 
adept  in  explaining  the  meaning  of  omens.  The  dead  lion 
with  her  eight  unborn  whelps  he  took  as  a  sign  that  Damis 
and  he  would  remain  a  year  and  eight  months  in  that  land.' 
When  Damis  objected  that  Homer  interpreted  the  sparrow 
and  her  eight  nestlings  whom  the  snake  devoured  as  nine 
years'  duration  of  the  Trojan  war,  Apollonius  retorted  that 
the  birds  had  been  hatched  but  that  the  whelps,  being  yet 
unborn,  could  not  signify  complete  years.  On  another  occa- 
sion he  interpreted  the  birth  of  a  three-headed  child  as  a 
sign  of  the  year  of  the  three  emperors.^ 


Philostratus  to   have  been   copied  'VI,    ii. 

from    it.      He    concludes    it    with  *  I,  23. 

the    positive    assertion,    "This    is  *  IV,  34. 

really    what    took    place,    though  'VIII,   7. 

there     should     be     ten     thousand  "  IV,  37. 

doubters."     (LXVII,  18.)  'I,  22. 

'Ill,  42.  "V,  13. 


VIII  APOLLONIUS  OF  TYANA  261 

Such  interpretation  of  dreams  and  omens  suggests  an  Animals 

lation. 


art  or  arts  of  divination  rather  than  foreknowledge  by  di-  ^^^mc 


rect  divine  inspiration.  So  does  the  passage  in  which  Apol- 
lonius  informs  Domitian,  when  accused  before  him  of  having 
divined  the  future  by  sacrificing  a  boy,  that  human  entrails 
are  inferior  to  those  of  animals  for  purposes  of  divination, 
since  the  beasts  are  less  perturbed  by  knowledge  of  their 
approaching  death. ^  Apollonius  himself  would  not  sacrifice 
even  animal  victims,  but  he  enlarged  his  powers  of  divina- 
tion during  his  sojourn  among  the  Arab  tribes  by  learning 
to  understand  the  language  of  animals  and  to  listen  to  the 
birds  as  these  predict  the  future.^  The  Arabs  acquire  this 
power  by  eating,  some  say  the  heart,  others  the  liver,  of 
dragons, — a  fact  which  gave  the  church  historian  Eusebius 
an  opportunity  to  charge  Apollonius  with  having  broken  his 
taboo  of  animal  flesh. 

Although  he  did  not  sacrifice  animals  and  divine  from  Divination 
their  entrails,  Apollonius  appears  to  have  employed  prac-  ^ 
tices  akin  to  those  of  the  art  of  pyromancy  when  he  threw  a 
handful  of  frankincense  into  the  sacrificial  fire  with  a 
prayer  to  the  sun,  "and  watched  to  see  how  the  smoke  of  it 
curled  upwards,  and  how  it  grew  turbid,  and  in  how  many 
points  it  shot  up;  and  in  a  manner  he  caught  the  meaning 
of  the  fire,  and  observed  how  it  appeared  of  good  omen  and 
pure."  ^  Again  he  visited  an  Egyptian  temple  and  sacrificed 
an  image  of  a  bull  made  of  frankincense  and  told  the  priest 
that  if  he  really  understood  the  science  of  divination  by  fire 
(kfiirvpov  ao(j)ias),  he  would  see  many  things  revealed  in  the 
circle  of  the  rising  sun.'* 

It  should  be  added  that  only  a  very  ardent  admirer  of  Other 
Apollonius   or   an   equally   ardent    seeker   after   prophecies  so-called 
would  see  anything  prophetic   in   some  of  the  apparently  tions. 
chance  remarks  of  the  sage  which  have  been  perverted  into 
predictions.     At  Ephesus   he  did  not  actually  predict  the 
plague,  which  had  already  begun  to  spread  judging  from  the 

'VIII,  7.  "I,  31. 

'I,  20.  "V,  25. 


■     262  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

account  of  Philostratus,  but  rather  warned  the  heedless  pop- 
ulation to  take  measures  to  prevent  its  becoming  general.^ 
When  visiting  the  isthmus  of  Corinth  he  began  to  say  that 
it  w^ould  be  cut  through,  an  idea  which  had  doubtless  oc- 
curred again  and  again  to  many ;  but  then  said  that  it  would 
not  be  cut  through.^  This  sane,  if  somewhat  vacillating, 
state  of  mind  received  confirmation  soon  afterwards  when 
Nero  attempted  an  Isthmian  canal  but  left  it  uncompleted. 
Another  similarly  ambiguous  utterance  was  elicited  from 
Apollonius  by  an  eclipse  of  the  sun  accompanied  by  thunder : 
"There  shall  be  some  great  event  and  there  shall  not  be."  ^ 
This  was  believed  to  receive  miraculous  fulfillment  three 
days  later  when  a  thunderbolt  dashed  the  cup  out  of  which 
Nero  was  drinking  from  his  hands  but  left  him  unharmed. 
Once  Apollonius  saved  his  life  by  changing  from  a  ship 
which  sank  soon  afterwards  to  another  vessel.*  An  instance 
of  more  specific  prophecy  is  the  case  of  the  consul  Aelian, 
who  testified  that  when  he  was  but  a  tribune  under  Vespa- 
sian, Apollonius  took  him  aside  and  told  him  his  name  and 
country  and  parentage,  "and  you  foretold  to  me  that  I 
should  hold  this  high  office  which  is  accounted  by  the  multi- 
tude the  highest  of  all."  ^  But  Aelian  may  have  exagger- 
ated the  accuracy  of  Apollonius's  prediction,  or  the  latter 
may  have  made  a  shrewd  guess  that  Aelian  was  likely  to 
rise  to  high  office. 
Apollonius  The  divining  faculty  of  Apollonius  enabled  him  to  de- 
and  the  ^^^^  ^^le  presence  and  influence  of  demons,  phantoms,  and 
goblins,  whose  ways  he  understood  as  well  as  the  language 
of  the  birds.  At  Ephesus  he  detected  the  true  cause  of  the 
plague  in  a  ragged  old  beggar  whom  he  ordered  the  people 
to  stone  to  death. ^  At  this  command  the  blinking  eyes  of 
the  aged  mendicant  suddenly  shot  forth  malevolent  and  fiery 
gleams  and  revealed  his  demon  character.  Afterwards,  when 
the  people  removed  the  stones,  they  found  underneath, 
pounded  to  a  pulp,  an  enormous  hound  still  vomiting  foam 

'IV,  4.  "V,  18. 

MV,  24.  'VII,  18. 

'IV,  43.  'IV,  10. 


VIII  APOLLONIUS  OF  TYANA  263 

as  mad  dogs  do.  Later,  when  accused  of  magic  before 
Domitian,  Apollonius  requested  that  the  emperor  question 
him  in  private  about  the  causes  of  this  pestilence  at  Ephesus, 
which  he  said  were  too  deep  to  be  discussed  pubHcly.^  And 
earher  in  the  reign  of  Nero,  when  asked  by  TigelHnus  how 
he  got  the  better  of  demons  and  phantasms,  he  evaded  the 
question  by  a  saucy  retort.^  On  one. occasion,  however,  we 
are  told  that  he  got  rid  of  a  ghostly  apparition  by  heaping 
abuse  upon  it ;  ^  and  a  satyr,  who  remained  invisible  but  cre- 
ated annoyance  by  running  amuck  through  the  camp,  he  dis- 
posed of  by  the  expedient  of  filling  a  trough  with  wine  and 
letting  the  spirit  get  drunk  on  it.  When  the  wine  had  all  dis- 
appeared, Apollonius  led  his  companions  to  the  cave  of  the 
nymphs  where  the  satyr  was  now  visible  in  a  drunken  sleep.* 
He  also  reformed  the  character  of  a  licentious  youth  by  ex- 
pelling a  demon  from  him,^  and  at  Corinth  exposed  a  lamia 
who,  under  the  disguise  of  a  dainty  and  wealthy  lady,  was 
fattening  up  a  beautiful  youth  named  Menippus  with  the 
intention  of  eventually  devouring  his  blood.^  On  his  return 
by  sea  from  India  Apollonius  passed  a  sacred  island  where 
lived  a  sea  nymph  or  female  demon  who  was  as  destructive 
to  mariners  as  Scylla  or  the  Sirens  were  of  old. 

But  the  word  "demon"  is  not  always  employed  by  Phi-  Not  all 
lostratus  in  the  sense  of  an  evil  spirit.  The  annunciation  ot  ^re  evil 
the  birth  of  Apollonius  was  made  to  his  mother  by  Proteus 
in  the  form  of  an  Egyptian  demon."^  Damis  looked  upon 
Apollonius  himself  as  a  demon  and  worshiped  him  as  such, 
when  he  heard  him  say  that  he  comprehended  not  only  all 
human  languages  but  also  those  things  concerning  which 
men  maintain  silence.^  In  a  letter  to  Euphrates  ^  Apollonius 
affirms  that  the  all-wise  Pythagoras  should  be  classed  among 
demons.     But  when  Domitian,  on  first  meeting  Apollonius 

*VIII,  7.  "IV,   25. 

•n,  4.  ^'  4- 

*  VI,  27.  *  I,  19- 

"IV,  20.  "Epist.  50. 


264 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Philo- 

stratus's 
faith  in 
demons. 


The 

ghost  of 
Achilles. 


Healing 
the  sick 
and   rais- 
ing the 
dead. 


said  that  he  looked  like  a  demon,  the  sage  replied  that  the 
emperor  was  confusing  demons  and  human  beings.-^ 

Philostratus  adds  his  own  bit  of  personal  testimony  to 
the  existence  of  demons,  although  it  cannot  be  said  to  be 
very  convincing.  After  telling  the  satyr  story  he  warns  his 
readers  not  to  be  incredulous  as  to  the  existence  of  satyrs  or 
to  doubt  that  they  make  love.  For  they  should  not  mistrust 
what  is  supported  by  experience  and  by  Philostratus's  own 
word.  For  he  knew  in  Lemnos  a  youth  of  his  own  age 
whose  mother  was  said  to  be  visited  by  a  satyr,  and  such  he 
probably  was,  since  he  wore  a  fawn  skin  tied  around  his 
neck  by  the  two  front  paws.^ 

Apollonius  had  an  interview  with  the  ghost  of  Achilles 
which  strongly  suggests  necromancy.  He  sent  his  compan- 
ions on  board  ship  and  passed  the  night  alone  at  the  hero's 
tomb.  Nor  did  he  allude  to  what  had  happened  until  ques- 
tioned by  the  curious  Damis.  He  then  averred  that  his 
method  of  invoking  the  dead  had  not  been  that  of  Odysseus, 
but  that  he  had  prayed  to  Achilles  much  as  the  Indians  do 
to  their  heroes.  A  slight  earthquake  then  occurred  and 
Achilles  appeared.  At  first  he  was  five  cubits  tall  but  grad- 
ually increased  to  some  twelve  cubits  in  height.  At  cock- 
crow he  vanished  in  a  flash  of  summer  lightning.^ 

Apollonius,  as  well  as  the  Brahmans,  wrought  some 
cures.  One  was  of  a  boy  who  had  been  bitten  by  a  mad  dog 
and  consequently  "behaved  exactly  like  a  dog,  for  he 
barked  and  howled  and  went  on  all  fours."  *  Apollonius 
first  found  and  quieted  the  dog,  and  then  made  it  lick  the 
wound,  a  homeopathic  treatment  which  cured  the  boy.  It 
now  only  remained  to  cure  the  dog,  too,  and  this  the  philoso- 
pher effected  by  praying  to  the  river  which  was  near  by  and 
then  making  the  dog  swim  across  it.  "For,"  concludes  Phi- 
lostratus, "a  drink  of  water  will  cure  a  mad  dog  if  he  only 
can  be  induced  to  take  it."  The  modern  reader  will  suspect 
that  the  dog  was  not  mad  to  begin  with  and  that  Apollonius 


'VII,  32. 
"VI,  27. 


MV,  II,  1S-16. 
*VI,  43. 


VIII  APOLLONIUS  OF  TYANA  265 

cleverly  cured  the  boy's  complaint  by  the  same  force  that 
had  induced  it — suggestion.  Apollonius  once  revived  a 
maiden  who  was  being  borne  to  the  grave  by  touching  her 
and  saying  something  to  her,  but  Philostratus  honestly  ad- 
mits that  he  is  not  sure  whether  he  restored  her  to  life  or 
detected  signs  of  life  in  the  body  which  had  escaped  the 
notice  of  everyone  else.^ 

When  Apollonius  was  brought  before  Tigellinus,  the  Other 
scroll  on  which  the  charges  against  him  had  been  written  was  ^^^"^^  ^' 
found  to  have  become  quite  blank  when  Tigellinus  unrolled 
it.^  Upon  that  occasion  and  again  before  Domitian  he  in- 
timated that  his  body  could  not  be  bound  or  slain  against 
his  will.^  The  former  contention  he  proved  to  the  satisfac- 
tion of  Damis,  who  visited  him  in  prison,  by  suddenly  re- 
moving his  leg  from  the  fetters  and  then  inserting  it  again.* 
Damis  regarded  this  exhibition  as  a  divine  miracle,  since 
Apollonius  performed  it  without  magical  ceremony  or  in- 
cantations. He  is  also  represented  as  escaping  from  his 
bonds  at  about  midnight  when  imprisoned  later  in  life  in 
Crete.^  Philostratus,  too,  implies  that  he  vanished  miracu- 
lously from  the  courtroom  of  Domitian  and  that  he  some- 
times passed  from  one  place  to  another  in  an  incredibly 
short  time,  and  is  somewhat  doubtful  whether  he  ever  died. 
But  we  have  seen  that  even  on  the  testimony  of  Damis  and 
Philostratus  themselves  many  of  the  marvels  and  predic- 
tions of  Apollonius  were  not  "artless"  but  involved  a  knowl- 
edge of  contemporary  natural  science  and  medicine,  or  of 
arts  of  divination,  or  the  employment,  in  a  way  not  unlike 
the  procedure  of  magic,  of  forces  and  materials  outside  him- 
self, namely,  the  occult  virtues  of  things  in  nature  or  incan- 
tations, rites,  and  ceremonies. 

So  much  for  Apollonius  and  his  magic,  but  the  Life  con-  Golden 

tains  some  interesting  allusions  to  the    1^7^    or   wryneck,  ^"(["the 

which  throw  light  upon  the  use  of  that  bird  in  Greek  magic,  »"»•«■• 

but  which  have  seldom  been  noted  and  then  not  correctly 

*  IV.  45.  *  VII,  38. 

'  IV,  44-  •  VIII,  30. 

•VIII,  8. 


266  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

interpreted.-^  The  wryneck  was  so  much  employed  in  Greek 
magic,  as  references  to  it  from  Pindar  to  Theocritus  show, 
that  the  word  iunx  was  sometimes  used  as  a  synonym  or 
figurative  expression  for  spells  or  charms  in  general.  Phi- 
lostratus,  too,  employs  it  in  this  sense,  representing  the  Gym- 
nosophists  as  accusing  the  Brahmans  of  "appealing  to  the 
crowd  with  varied  enchantments  (or  iunges)."^  But  in 
other  passages  he  makes  it  clear  that  the  wryneck  is  still  em- 
ployed as  a  magic  bird.  Describing  the  royal  palace  at 
Babylon  ^  he  states  that  the  Magi  have  hung  four  golden 
wrynecks,  which  they  themselves  attune  and  which  they  call 
the  tongues  of  the  gods,  from  the  ceiling  of  the  judgment 
hall  to  remind  the  king  of  divine  judgment  and  not  to  set 
himself  above  mankind.  Golden  wrynecks  were  also  sus- 
pended in  the  Pythian  temple  at  Delphi,  and  in  this  connec- 
tion they  are  said  to  possess  some  of  the  virtue  of  the  Sirens,^ 
or,  as  Mr.  Cook  translates  it,  "to  echo  the  persuasive  note  of 
siren  voices."  These  two  passages  seem  to  point  clearly  to 
the  employment  of  mechanical  metal  birds  which  sang  and 
moved  as  if  by  magic.  The  Greek  mathematician  Hero  in 
his  explanation  of  mechanical  devices  employed  in  temples 
tells  how  to  make  a  bird  turn  itself  about  and  whistle  by 
turning  a  wheel. ^ 
Why  Now  this  is  precisely  what  the  wryneck  does  in  its  "won- 

named         derful  way  of  writhing  its  head  and  neck"  and  emitting  hiss- 
ing sounds.     The  bird's  "unmistakable  note"  is  "que,  que, 

*  The  passages  are  not  listed  in  birds.    But  the  iunx  is  found  as  a 

Liddell  and  Scott,  nor  mentioned  bird    on    several    Greek   vases    of 

by  Professor  Bury  in  his  note  on  the     latest     period ;     see     British 

"The     tvy^     in     Greek     Magic,"  Museum  Catalogue  of  Vases,  vol. 

Journal      of      Hellenic      Studies  IV,    figs.    94,   98,    342,    163,    331b; 

(1886),      pp.       157-60.      Hubert's  magic  wheels  are  also  represented 

article  on  "Magia"  in  Daremberg-  on  the  vases,  but  are  not  described 

Saglio  cites  only  one  passage  and  as    iunges   in    the    catalogue ;    see 

seems    to    regard    the    iunx    solely  vol.   IV,  figs.  33 la,  272>,  385,  399f 

as    a    magic    wheel.      D'Arcy    W.  409,   436,   450,    458,   and   vol.    Ill, 

Thompson,  A   Glossary   of   Greek  E  774,  F  223,  F  279. 

Birds,  Oxford,  1895,  also  cites  but  ^  VI,  10;  see  also  VIII,  7. 

one    passage     from     Philostratus.  ^  I,  25. 

A.    B.    Cook,    Zeus,    Cambridge,  *VI,   11. 

1914,   I,   253-65,    notes   both   main  "  Cited    by    Cook,    Zeus,   I,   266, 

passages  but  tries  to  interpret  the  who,  however,  fails  to  connect  it 

iunges  as  solar  wheels  rather  than  with  the  iunx. 


lunxi 


VIII  APOLLONIUS  OF  TYANA  267 

que,  repeated  many  times  in  succession,  at  first  rapidly,  but 
gradually  slowing  and  in  a  continually  falling  key."  ^  I 
would  therefore  suggest  that  as  the  English  name  for  the 
bird  is  derived  from  its  writhing  its  neck,  so  the  Greek  name 
comes  from  its  cry,  for  "que"  and  the  root  1^7,  if  repeated 
rapidly  many  times  in  succession,  sound  much  alike. ^ 

The  name,  Apollonius,  continued  to  be  associated  with  ApoIIonius 
magic  in  the  middle  ages,  when  the  Golden  Flozvers  of  middle 
Apollonius,  a  work  on  the  notory  art  or  theurgy,^  is  found  ^ses. 
in  the  manuscripts.     And  we  shall  find  Cecco  d'Ascoli  *  in 
the  early  fourteenth  century  citing  a  "book  of  magic  art"  by 
Apollonius  and  also  a  treatise  on  spirits,  De  angelica  fac- 
tione.     In  1412  Amplonius  listed  in  the  catalogue  of  his 
manuscripts  a  "book  of  Apollonius  the  magician  or  philoso- 
pher which  is  called  Elizinus."  ^     Works  on  the  causes  and 
properties   of   things   are    also   ascribed   to   Apollonius   in 
medieval  manuscripts,^  and  a  Balenus  or  Belenus  to  whom 
works  on  astrological  images  and  seals  are  ascribed  in  the 
manuscripts  ^  is  perhaps  a  corruption  for  Apollonius.^ 

^  Newton's  Dictionary  of  Birds;  Elizinus. 

a    reference    supplied    me    by    the  *BN   13951,   12th  century,  Liber 

kindness    of    my    colleague,    Pro-  Apollonii   de   principalibus    rerum 

fessor  F.  H.  Herrick.  causis.    Vienna  3124,  15th  century, 

'  Professor    Bury's    theory    that  fols.     57v-s8v,     "Verba     de     pro- 

"the    bird    was    called    Xvy^    from  prietatibus  rerum  quomodo  virtus 

its    call    which    sounded    like      icb  unius   frangitur  per  aliuni.     Ada- 

ico;     and    it    was    used    in    lunar  mas  nee   ferro  nee  igne   domatur 

enchantments  because  it  was  sup-  .../...  cito  medetur." 

posed    to    be    calling    on    lo,    the  '  Royal    12-C-XVIII,    Baleni    de 

moon":  and  that  "Ivyi,    originally  imaginibus ;      Sloane     3826,     fols. 

meant  a  moon-song  independently  loov-ioi,  Beleemus  de  imaginibus; 

of   the   wryneck,"   which   came  to  Sloane     3848,     fols.     52-8,     Liber 

be     employed     in     magic     moon-  Balamini      sapientis      de      sigillis 

worship  on  account  of  its  cry,  has  planetarum,  fols.  59-62,  liber  sapi- 

already     been     refuted     by     Pro-  entis   Baleym   de  ymaginibus   sep- 

fessor     Thompson,     who     pointed  tern  planetarum.    But  these  forms 

out   that    "the   bird   does   not   cry  might  suggest   Balaam.     We  also 

lw„  i<ji,   and    the    suggested    deri-  hear  of  Flacius  Affricus,  a  disciple 

vation    of    its   name   and    sanctity  of  Belenus. 

from  such  a  cry  cannot  hold."  *  M.  Steinschneider,  "Apollonius 

'See    Chapter    49    for    a    fuller  von    Thyana    (oder    Balinas)    bei 

account  of  it.  den   Arabern,"    in  Zeitschrift  der 

*  See   Chapter   71.  Deutschen   M orgenl'dndischcn   Ge- 

'Math.     54,     Liber     Appollonii  j^//.yc/za/f,  XLV  (1891),  439-46. 
magi    vel    philosophi    qui    dicitur 


CHAPTER  IX 

LITERARY     AND      PHILOSOPHICAL     ATTACKS     UPON     SUPER- 
STITION :    CICERO,    FAVORINUS,   SEXTUS  EMPIRICUS, 
AND  LUCIAN 

Authors  to  be  considered — Their  standpoint — De  divinatione ;  argu- 
ment of  Quintus — Cicero  attacks  past  authority— Divination  distinct 
from  natural  science — Unreasonable  in  method — Requires  violation^  of 
natural  law — Cicero  and  astrology — His  crude  historical  criticism — 
Favorinus  against  astrologers — Sextus  Empiricus — Lucius,  or  The  Ass: 
is  it  by  Lucian? — Career  of  Lucian — Alexander  the  pseudo-prophet — 
Magical  procedure  in  medicine  satirized — Snake-charming — A  Hyp^er- 
borean  magician — Some  ghost  stories — Pancrates,  the  magician — 
Credulity  and  scepticism — Menippus,  or  Necromancy — Astrological  in- 
terpretation of  Greek  myth — History  and  defense  of  astrology — Lucian 
not  always  sceptical — Lucian  and  medicine — Inevitable  intermingling 
of  scepticism  and  superstition — Lucian  on  writing  history. 

Authors  Having  noted  the  large  amount  of  magic  that  still  existed 
sidered.  ^oth  in  the  leading  works  of  natural  science  of  the  early 
Roman  empire  and  in  the  more  general  literature  of  that 
period,  it  is  only  fair  that  we  should  note  such  extremes  of 
scepticism  towards  the  superstitions  then  current  as  can  be 
found  during  the  same  period.  They  are,  however,  few 
and  far  between,  and  we  shall  have  to  go  back  to  the  close 
of  the  Republican  period  for  the  best  instance  in  the  De 
divinatione  of  Cicero.  As  Pliny's  Ncttural  History  was 
mainly  a  compilation  of  earlier  Greek  science,  so  Cicero's 
arguments  against  divination  were  not  entirely  original  with 
him.  As  his  other  philosophical  writings  are  largely  in- 
debted to  the  Greeks,  so  his  attack  upon  divination  is  sup- 
posed to  be  under  considerable  obligations  to  Clitomachus 
and  Panaetius,-^  philosophers  of  the  New  Academy  and  the 

*  T.  Schiche,  De  foniibus  libra-  Die  Quellen  von  Ciceros  swei 
rum  Ciccronis  qui  sunt  de  divina-  BHichern  de  Divinatione,  Freiburg, 
Hone,  Jena,   1875;   K.   Hartf elder,       1878. 

268 


CHAP.  IX         ATTACKS  UPON  SUPERSTITION  269 

Stoic  school  who  flourished  respectively  at  Carthage  and 
Athens  and  at  Rhodes  and  Rome  in  the  second  century  be- 
fore our  era.  We  shall  next  briefly  note  the  criticisms  of 
astrologers  and  astrology  made  by  Favorinus,  a  rhetorician 
from  Gaul  who  resided  at  Rome  under  Hadrian  and  was  a 
friend  of  Plutarch  but  whose  argument  against  the  astrolo- 
gers has  been  preserved  only  in  the  Attic  Nights  of  Aulus 
Gellius/  and  by  Sextus  Empiricus,^  a  sceptical  philosopher 
who  wrote  about  200.  Finally  we  shall  consider  Lucian's 
satirical  depiction  of  various  superstitions  of  his  time. 

It  will  be  noticed  that  no  one  of  these  critics  of  magic,  Their 
if  we  may  so  designate  them,  is  primarily  a  natural  scientist. 
Cicero  and  Lucian  and  Favorinus  are  primarily  men  of  let- 
ters and  rhetoricians.  And  all  four  of  our  critics  write  to 
a  greater  or  less  extent  from  the  professed  standpoint  of  a 
general  sceptical  attitude  in  all  matters  of  philosophy  and 
not  merely  in  the  matter  of  superstition.  Thus  the  attack 
of  Sextus  Empiricus  upon  astrology  occurs  in  a  work  which 
is  directed  against  learning  in  general,  and  in  which  he  assails 
grammarians,  rhetoricians,  geometricians,  arithmeticians, 
students  of  music,  logicians,  physicists,  and  students  of 
ethics,  as  well  as  the  casters  of  horoscopes.  Aulus  Gellius 
did  not  know  whether  to  take  the  arguments  of  Favorinus 
against  the  astrologers  seriously  or  not.  He  says  that  he 
heard  Favorinus  make  the  speech  the  substance  of  which  he 
repeats,  but  that  he  is  unable  to  state  whether  the  philosopher 
really  meant  what  he  said  or  argued  merely  in  order  to 
exercise  and  to  display  his  genius.  There  was  reason  for 
this  perplexity  of  Aulus  Gellius,  since  Favorinus  was  in- 
clined to  such  tours  de  force  as  eulogies  of  Thersites  or  of 
Quartan  Fever. 

De  divinatione  takes  the  form  of  a  supposititious  conver-  De  divina- 

sation,  or  better,  informal  debate,  between  the  author  and  argument 

his  brother  Quintus.     In  the  first  book  Ouintus,  in  a  rather  °^  Quin- 

.  .  .      '^       .  .  .        tus. 

rambling  and  leisurely  fashion  and  with  occasional  repetition 

*  Aulus   Gellius,  Nodes  Atticae,  'Adv.     astro!.,     in     Opera,     ed. 

XIV,  I.  Johannes       Albertus       Fabricius, 

Leipzig,   1718. 


270 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


of  ideas,  upholds  divination  to  the  best  of  his  ability,  citing* 
many  reported  instances  of  successful  recourse  to  it  in 
antiquity.  In  the  second  book  Tully  proceeds  with  a  some- 
what patronizing  air  to  pull  entirely  to  pieces  the  arguments 
of  his  brother  who  assents  with  cheerful  readiness  to  their 
demolition.  On  the  whole  the  appeal  to  the  past  is  the  main 
point  in  the  argument  of  Quintus.  What  race  or  state,  he 
asks,  has  not  believed  in  some  form  of  divination?  "For 
before  the  revelation  of  philosophy,  which  was  discovered 
but  recently,  public  opinion  had  no  doubt  of  the  truth  of 
this  art;  and  after  philosophy  emerged  no  philosopher  of 
authority  thought  otherwise.  I  have  mentioned  Pytha- 
goras, Democritus,  Socrates.  I  have  left  out  no  one  of  the 
ancients  save  Xenophanes.  I  have  added  the  Old  Academy, 
the  Peripatetics,  the  Stoics.  Epicurus  alone  dissented."  ^ 
Quintus  closes  his  long  argument  in  favor  of  the  truth 
of  divination  by  solemnly  asserting  that  he  does  not  approve 
of  sorcerers,  nor  of  those  who  prophesy  for  the  sake  of 
gain,  nor  of  the  practice  of  questioning  the  spirits  of  the 
dead — which  nevertheless,  he  says,  was  a  custom  of  his 
brother's  friend  Appius." 

When  Tully's  turn  to  speak  comes,  he  rudely  disturbs  his 
brother's  reliance  upon  tradition.  "I  think  it  not  the  part  of 
a  philosopher  to  employ  witnesses,  who  are  only  haply  true 
and  often  purposely  false  and  deceiving.  He  ought  to 
show  why  a  thing  is  so  by  arguments  and  reasons,  not  by 
events,  especially  those  I  cannot  credit."  ^  "Antiquity," 
Cicero  declares  later,  "has  erred  in  many  respects."  **  The 
existence  of  the  art  of  divination  in  every  age  and  nation 
has  little  effect  upon  him.  There  is  nothing,  he  asserts,  so 
widespread  as  ignorance.^ 
Divination  "^^^^  brothers  distinguish  divination  as  a  separate  sub- 

distinct        ject  from  the  natural  or  even  the  applied  sciences.    Quintus 
rafscience!   says  that  medical  men,  pilots,  and   farmers   foresee  many 
things,  yet  their  arts  are  not  divination.     "Not  even  Phere- 

^  De  dizinatione,  I,  39.  *  Ibid.,  II,  2>2>- 

^Ibid.,   I,    58.  ^Ibid..  II,  36. 

'Ibid.,  II,  II. 


Cicero 
attacks 
past 
authority. 


IX  ATTACKS  UPON  SUPERSTITION  271 

cydes,  that  famous  Pythagorean  master,  who  predicted  an 
earthquake  when  he  saw  that  the  water  had  disappeared 
from  a  well  which  usually  was  well  filled,  should  be  re- 
garded as  a  diviner  rather  than  a  physicist."  ^  Tully  carries 
the  distinction  a  step  further  and  asserts  that  the  sick  seek 
a  doctor,  not  a  soothsayer;  that  diviners  cannot  instruct  us 
in  astronomy;  that  no  one  consults  them  concerning  philo- 
sophic problems  or  ethical  questions ;  that  they  can  give  us 
no  light  on  the  problems  of  the  natural  universe;  and  that 
they  are  of  no  service  in  logic,  dialectic,  or  political  science.^ 
An  admirable  declaration  of  independence  of  natural  science 
and  medicine  and  other  arts  and  constructive  forms  of 
thought  from  the  methods  of  divination !  But  also  one 
more  easy  to  state  in  general  terms  of  theory  than  to  enforce 
in  details  of  practice,  as  Pliny,  Galen,  and  Ptolemy  have 
already  shown  us.  None  the  less  it  is  indeed  a  noteworthy 
restriction  of  the  field  of  divination  when  Cicero  remarks 
to  his  brother,  "For  those  things  which  can  be  perceived 
beforehand  either  by  art  or  reason  or  experience  or  conjec- 
ture you  regard  as  not  the  affair  of  diviners  but  of  scien- 
tists." ^  But  the  question  remains  whether  too  large  powers 
of  prediction  may  not  be  claimed  by  "science." 

Cicero  proceeds  to  attack  the  methods  and  assumptions 
of  divination  as  neither  reasonable  nor  scientific.  Why,  Unreason- 
he  asks,  did  Calchas  deduce  from  the  devoured  sparrows  ^gfj^*'^ 
that  the  Trojan  war  would  last  ten  years  rather  than  ten 
weeks  or  ten  months  ?  *  He  points  out  that  the  art  is  con- 
ducted in  different  places  according  to  quite  different  rules 
of  procedure,  even  to  the  extent  that  a  favorable  omen  in 
one  locality  is  a  sinister  warning  elsewhere.^  He  refuses  to 
believe  in  any  extraordinary  bonds  of  sympathy  between 
things  which,  in  so  far  as  our  daily  experience  and  our 

'I,  so.  ''11,30. 

a  Tj    -  .  "  II,    12.     An    astrologer,    how- 

'  '^  ^'  ever,     would     probably     say    that 

*  II,  5.     "Quae  enim  praesentiri  seeming  contradiction  could  be  ac- 

aut  arte  aut   ratione  aut   usu  aut  counted  for  by  the  varying  influ- 

coniectura  possunt,  ea  non  divinis  ence    of    the    constellations    upon 

tribuenda  putas  sed  peritis."  different  regions. 


2^2 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Requires 
violation 
of  natural 
law. 


Cicero  and 
astrology. 


knowledge  of  the  workings  of  nature  can  inform  us,  have 
no  causal  connection.  What  intimate  connection,  he  asks, 
what  bond  of  natural  causality  can  there  be  between  the 
liver  or  heart  or  lung  of  a  fat  bull  and  the  divine  eternal 
cause  of  all  which  rules  the  universe?^  "That  anything 
certain  is  signified  by  uncertain  things,  is  not  this  the  last 
thing  a  scientist  should  admit?"  "  He  refuses  to  accept 
dreams  as  fit  channels  either  of  natural  divination  or  divine 
revelation.^  The  Sibylline  Books,  like  most  oracles,  are 
vague  and  the  evident  product  of  labored  ingenuity.* 

Moreover,  divination  asserts  the  existence  of  phenomena 
which  science  denies.  Such  a  figment,  Cicero  scornfully 
affirms,  as  that  the  heart  will  vanish  from  the  carcass  of  a 
victim  is  not  believed  even  by  old-wives  now-a-days.  How 
can  the  heart  vanish  from  the  body?  Surely  it  must  be 
there  as  long  as  life  lasts,  and  how  can  it  disappear  in  an 
instant?  "Believe  me,  you  are  abandoning  the  citadel  of  phi- 
losophy while  you  defend  its  outposts.  For  in  your  effort 
to  prove  soothsaying  true  you  utterly  pervert  physiology. 
.  .  .  For  there  will  be  something  which  either  springs  from 
nothing  or  suddenly  vanishes  into  nothingness.  What  scien- 
tist ever  said  that?  The  soothsayers  say  so?  Are  they 
then,  do  you  think,  to  be  trusted  rather  than  scientists?"*^ 
Cicero  makes  other  arguments  against  divination  such 
as  the  stock  contentions  that  it  is  useless  to  know  prede- 
termined events  beforehand  since  they  cannot  be  avoided, 
and  that  even  if  we  can  learn  the  future,  we  shall  be  happier 
not  to  do  it,  but  his  outstanding  argument  is  that  it  is  un- 
scientific. 

Cicero's  attack  upon  divination  is  mainly  directed 
against  liver  divination  and  analogous  methods  of  predict- 
ing the  future,  but  he  devotes  a  few  chapters  ^  to  the  doc- 
trines of  the  Chaldeans.  They  postulate  a  certain  force  in 
the  constellations  called  the  zodiac  and  hold  that  between 
*II,  12.  'II,  60-71. 

^11,    19.     "Quid  igitur   minus   a  ^11,    54. 

physicis  dici  debet  quam  quidquam  'II,   16. 

certi  significari  rebus  incertis  ?"  "  II,  42-47. 


IX  ATTACKS  UPON  SUPERSTITION  273 

man  and  the  position  of  the  stars  and  planets  at  the  moment 
of  his  birth  there  exists  a  relation  of  sympathy  so  that  his 
personality  and  all  the  events  of  his  life  are  thereby  deter- 
mined. Diogenes  the  Stoic  limited  this  influence  to  the 
determination  of  one's  aptitude  and  vocation,  but  Cicero 
regards  even  this  much  as  going  too  far.  The  immense 
spaces  intervening  between  the  different  planets  seem  to  him 
a  reason  for  rejecting  the  contentions  of  the  Chaldeans. 
His  further  criticism  that  they  insist  that  all  men  born  at 
the  same  moment  are  alike  in  character  regardless  of  hori- 
zons and  different  aspects  of  the  sky  in  different  places  is 
one  that  at  least  did  not  hold  good  permanently  against 
astrology  and  is  not  true  of  Ptolemy.  He  asks  if  all  the 
men  who  perished  at  Cannae  were  born  beneath  the  same 
star  and  how  it  came  about  that  there  was  only  one  Homer 
if  several  men  are  born  every  instant.  He  also  adduces 
the  stock  argument  from  twins.  He  attacks  the  practice, 
which  we  shall  find  continued  in  the  middle  ages,  of  astro- 
logical prediction  of  the  fate  of  cities.  He  says  that  if  all 
animals  are  to  be  subjected  to  the  stars,  then  inanimate 
things  must  be,  too,  than  which  nothing  can  be  more  absurd. 
This  suggests  that  he  hardly  conceives  of  the  fundamental 
hypothesis  of  medieval  science  that  all  inferior  nature  is 
under  the  influence  of  the  celestial  bodies  and  their  motion 
and  light.  At  any  rate  his  arguments  are  directed  against 
the  casting  of  horoscopes  or  genethlialogy.  And  in  the 
matter  of  the  influence  of  the  planets  upon  man  he  was  not 
entirely  antagonistic,  at  least  in  other  writings  than  the  De 
divinatione,  for  in  the  Dream  of  Scipio  he  speaks  of  Jupiter 
as  a  star  wholesome  and  favorable  to  the  human  race,  of 
Mars  as  most  unfavorable.  He  further  calls  seven  and 
eight  perfect  numbers  and  speaks  of  their  product,  fifty-six, 
as  signifying  the  fatal  year  in  Scipio's  life.  Incidentally,  as 
another  instance  that  Cicero  was  not  always  sceptical,  it  may 
be  recalled  that  it  was  in  Cicero  that  Pliny  read  of  a  man 
who  could  see  one  hundred  and  thirty-five  miles. -^ 

^NH,  VII,  21. 


274 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


His  crude 
historical 
criticism. 


Favorinus 
against  as- 
trologers. 


Such  apparent  inconsistency  is  perhaps  a  sign  of  some- 
what indiscriminating  eclecticism  on  Cicero's  part.  We  ex- 
perience something  of  a  shock,  although  perhaps  we  should 
not  be  surprised,  to  find  him  in  his  Republic  ^  arguing  as 
seriously  in  favor  of  the  ascension  or  apotheosis  of  Romulus 
as  a  historic  fact  as  a  professor  of  natural  science  in  a 
denominational  college  might  argue  in  favor  of  the  his- 
toricity of  the  resurrection  of  Christ.  Although  in  the  De 
divinatione  he  impatiently  brushed  aside  the  testimony  of  so 
great  a  cloud  of  witnesses  and  of  most  philosophers  in  favor 
of  divination,  he  now  argues  that  the  opinion  that  Romulus 
had  become  a  god  "could  not  have  prevailed  so  universally 
unless  there  had  been  some  extraordinary  manifestation  of 
power,"  and  that  "this  is  the  more  remarkable  because  other 
men,  said  to  have  become  gods,  lived  in  less  learned  times 
when  the  mind  was  prone  to  invent  and  the  inexperienced 
were  easily  led  to  believe,"  whereas  Romulus  lived  only  six 
centuries  ago  when  literature  and  learning  had  already  made 
great  progress  in  removing  error,  when  "Greece  was  already 
full  of  poets  and  musicians,  and  little  faith  was  placed  in 
legends  unless  they  concerned  remote  antiquity."  Yet  a 
few  chapters  later  Cicero  notes  that  Numa  could  not  have 
been  a  pupil  of  Pythagoras,  since  the  latter  did  not  come  to 
Italy  until  140  years  after  his  death;  ^  and  in  a  third  chap- 
ter ^  when  Laelius  remarks,  "That  king  is  indeed  praised 
but  Roman  History  is  obscure,  for  although  we  know  the 
mother  of  this  king,  we  are  ignorant  of  his  father,"  Scipio 
replies,  "That  is  so ;  but  in  those  times  it  was  almost  enough 
if  only  the  names  of  the  kings  were  recorded."  We  can 
only  add,  "Consistency,  thou  art  a  jewel  1" 

Favorinus  denied  that  the  doctrine  of  nativities  was  the 
work  of  the  Chaldeans  and  regarded  it  as  the  more  recent 
invention  of  marvel-mongers,  tricksters,  and  mountebanks. 
He  regards  the  inference  from  the  effect  of  the  moon  on 
tides  to  that  of  the  stars  on  every  incident  of  our  daily  life 


^Republic,  II,  10. 


'Ibid..  II,   15. 


'Ibid.,  II,  18. 


IX  ATTACKS  UPON  SUPERSTITION  275 

as  unwarranted.  He  further  objects  that  if  the  Chaldeans 
did  record  astronomical  observations  these  would  apply  only 
to  their  own  region  and  that  observations  extended  over  a 
vast  lapse  of  time  would  be  necessary  to  establish  any  system 
of  astrology,  since  it  requires  ages  before  the  stars  return 
to  their  previous  positions.  Like  Cicero,  Favorinus  prob- 
ably manifests  his  ignorance  of  the  technique  of  astrology 
in  complaining  that  astrologers  do  not  allow  for  the  differ- 
ent influence  of  different  constellations  in  different  parts  of 
the  earth.  More  cogent  is  his  suggestion  that  there  may  be 
other  stars  equal  in  power  to  the  planets  which  men  cannot 
see  either  for  their  excess  of  splendor  or  because  of  their 
position.  He  also  objects  that  the  position  of  the  stars  is 
not  the  same  at  the  time  of  conception  and  the  time  of  birth, 
and  that,  if  the  different  fate  of  twins  may  be  explained  by 
the  fact  that  after  all  they  are  not  born  at  precisely  the  same 
moment,  the  time  of  birth  and  the  position  of  the  stars  must 
be  measured  with  an  exactness  practically  impossible.  He 
also  contends  that  it  is  not  for  human  beings  to  predict  the 
future  and  that  the  subjection  of  man  not  merely  in  matters 
of  external  fortune  but  in  his  own  acts  of  will  to  the  stars 
is  not  to  be  borne.  These  two  arguments  of  the  divine  pre- 
rogative and  of  human  free  will  became  Christian  favorites. 
He  complains  that  the  astrologers  predict  great  events  like 
battles  but  cannot  predict  small  ones,  and  declares  that  they 
may  congratulate  themselves  that  he  does  not  propose  such 
a  question  to  them  as  that  of  astral  influence  on  minute  ani- 
mals. This  and  his  further  question  why,  out  of  all  the 
grand  works  of  nature,  the  astrologers  limit  their  attention 
to  petty  human  fortune,  suggest  that  like  Cicero  he  did  not 
realize  that  astrology  was  or  would  become  a  theory  of  all 
nature  and  not  mere  genethlialogy. 

To  the  arguments  against  nativities  that  men  die  the  Sextus 
same  death  who  were  not  born  at  the  same  time  and  that  Empincus. 
men  who  are  born  at  the  same  time  are  not  identical  in 
character  or   fortune  Sextus  Empiricus  adds  the  derisive 
question  whether  a  man  and  an  ass  born  in  the  same  instant 


276 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Lucius  or 
The  Ass: 
is  it  by 
Lucian  ? 


would  suffer  exactly  the  same  destiny.  Ptolemy  would  of 
course  reply  that  while  the  influence  of  the  stars  is  constant 
in  both  cases  it  is  variably  received  by  men  and  donkeys; 
and  Sextus's  query  does  not  show  him  very  well  versed  in 
astrology.  He  mentions  the  obstacle  of  free  will  to  astro- 
logical theory  but  does  not  make  very  much  of  it.  The  chief 
point  which  he  makes  is  that  even  if  the  stars  do  rule  human 
destiny,  their  effect  cannot  be  accurately  measured.  He 
lays  stress  on  the  difficulty  of  exactly  determining  the  date 
of  birth  or  of  conception,  or  the  precise  moment  when  a 
star  passes  into  a  new  sign  of  the  zodiac.  He  notes  the 
variability  and  unreliability  of  water-clocks.  He  calls  atten- 
tion to  the  fact  that  observers  at  varying  altitudes  as  well 
as  in  different  localities  would  arrive  at  different  conclu- 
sions. Differences  in  eyesight  would  also  affect  results,  and 
it  is  difficult  to  tell  just  when  the  sun  sets  or  any  sign  of 
the  zodiac  drops  below  the  horizon  owing  to  reflection  and 
refraction  of  rays.  Sextus  thus  leaves  us  somewhat  in  doubt 
whether  his  objections  are  to  be  taken  as  indicative  of  a 
spirit  of  captious  criticism  towards  an  art,  the  fundamental 
principles  of  which  he  tacitly  recognizes  as  well-nigh  incon- 
testible,  or  whether  he  is  simply  trying  to  make  his  case 
doubly  sure  by  showing  astrology  to  be  impracticable  as 
well  as  unreasonable.  In  any  case  we  shall  find  his  argument 
that  the  influence  of  the  stars  cannot  be  measured  accurately 
repeated  by  Christian  writers. 

The  main  plot  of  the  Metamorphoses  of  Apuleius  ap- 
pears, shorn  of  the  many  additional  stories,  the  religious 
mysticism,  and  the  autobiographical  element  which  charac- 
terize his  narrative,  in  a  brief  and  perhaps  epitomized  Greek 
version,  entitled  Lucius  or  The  Ass,  among  the  works  of 
Lucian  of  Samosata,  the  contemporary  of  Apuleius  and 
noted  satirist.  The  work  is  now  commonly  regarded  as 
spurious,  since  the  style  seems  different  from  that  of  Lucian 
and  the  Attic  Greek  less  pure.  The  narrative,  too,  is  bare, 
at  least  compared  with  the  exuberant  fancy  of  Apuleius,  and 
seems  to  avoid  the  marvelous  and  romantic  details  in  which 


IX  ATTACKS  UPON  SUPERSTITION  277 

he  abounds.  Photius,  patriarch  of  Constantinople  in  the 
ninth  century,  who  regarded  the  work  as  Lucian's,  said  that 
he  wrote  in  it  as  one  deriding  the  extravagance  of  super- 
stition. Whether  this  be  true  of  The  Ass  or  not,  it  is  true 
of  other  satires  by  Lucian  of  undisputed  genuineness,  in 
which  he  ridicules  the  impostures  of  the  magic  and  pseudo- 
science  of  his  day.  In  place  of  the  genial  humor  and  fantas- 
tic imagination  with  which  his  African  contemporary  credu- 
lously welcomed  the  magic  and  occult  science  of  his  time, 
the  Syrian  satirist  probes  the  same  with  the  cool  mockery  of 
his  keen  and  sceptical  wit. 

Lucian  was  born  at  Samosata  near  Antioch  about  120  or  Career  of 
125  A.  D.  and  after  an  unsuccessful  beginning  as  a  sculptor's 
apprentice  turned  to  literature  and  philosophy.  He  prac- 
ticed in  the  law  courts  at  Antioch  for  some  time  and  also 
wrote  speeches  for  others.  For  a  considerable  period  of  his 
life  he  roamed  about  the  Mediterranean  world  from  Paphla 
gonia  to  Gaul  as  a  rhetorician,  and  like  Apuleius  resided  both 
at  Athens  and  Rome.  After  forty  he  ceased  teaching 
rhetoric  and  devoted  himself  to  literary  production,  living 
at  Athens.  Towards  the  close  of  his  life,  "when  he  already 
had  one  foot  in  Charon's  boat,"  ^  he  was  holding  a  well  paid 
and  important  legal  position  in  Egypt.  His  death  occurred 
perhaps  about  200  A.  D.  Some  ascribe  it  to  gout,  probably 
because  he  wrote  two  satires  on  that  disease.  Suidas  states 
that  Lucian  was  torn  to  pieces  by  dogs  as  a  punishment  for 
his  attacks  upon  Christianity,  which  again  is  probably  a 
perversion  of  Lucian's  own  statement  in  Peregrinus  that  he 
narrowly  escaped  being  torn  to  pieces  by  the  Cynics. 

It  was  at  the  request  of  that  same  adversary  of  Chris-  Alexander 

tianity  against  whom  Origen  composed  the  Reply  to  Ceisus  'A'^j^j^. 

that  Lucian  wrote  his  account  of  the  impostor,  Alexander   prophet. 

of  Abonutichus,  a  pseudo-prophet  of   Paphlagonia.     This 

Alexander  pretended  to  discover  the  god  Asclepius  in  th« 

form  of  a  small  viper  which  he  had  sealed  up  in  a  goose  tgg. 

'^Apologia  pro  mercede  conduc-      H.  W.  Fowler  and  F.  G.  Fowler, 
tis.    Most  of  Lucian's  Essays  have       1905,  4  vols, 
been    translated   into    English   by 


278  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

He  then  replaced  the  tiny  viper  by  a  huge  tame  serpent  which 
he  had  purchased  at  Pella  in  Macedon  and  which  was  trained 
to  hide  its  head  in  Alexander's  armpit,  while  to  the  crowd, 
who  were  also  permitted  to  touch  the  tail  and  body  of  the 
real  snake,  was  shown  a  false  serpent's  head  made  of  linen 
with  human  features  and  a  mouth  that  opened  and  shut  and 
a  tongue  that  could  be  made  to  dart  in  and  out.  Having  thus 
convinced  the  people  that  the  viper  had  really  been  a  god 
and  had  miraculously  increased  in  size,  Alexander  proceeded 
to  sell  oracular  responses  as  from  the  god.  Inquirers  sub- 
mitted their  questions  in  sealed  packages  which  were  later 
returned  to  them  with  appropriate  answers  and  with  the  seals 
unbroken  and  apparently  untouched.  Similarly  Plutarch 
tells  of  a  sceptical  opponent  of  oracles  who  became  converted 
into  their  ardent  supporter  by  receiving  such  an  answer  to 
a  sealed  letter.^  Lucian,  however,  explains  that  Alexander 
sometimes  used  a  hot  needle  to  melt  the  seal  and  then  restore 
it  to  practically  its  original  shape,  or  employed  other  methods 
by  which  he  took  exact  impressions  of  the  seal,  then  boldly 
broke  it,  read  the  question,  and  afterwards  replaced  the  seal 
by  an  exact  replica  of  the  original  made  in  the  mould. 
Lucian  adds  that  there  are  plenty  of  other  devices  of  this 
sort  which  he  does  not  need  to  repeat  to  Celsus  who  has 
already  made  a  sufficient  collection  of  them  in  his  "excellent 
treatises  against  the  magicians."  Lucian  tells  later,  how- 
ever, how  Alexander  made  his  god  seem  to  speak  by  attach- 
ing a  tube  made  of  the  windpipes  of  cranes  to  the  artificial 
head  and  having  an  assistant  outside  speak  through  this 
concealed  tube.  In  our  later  discussion  of  the  church  father 
Hippolytus  we  shall  find  that  he  apparently  made  use  of  this 
expose  of  magic  by  Lucian  as  well  as  of  the  arguments  of 
Sextus  Empiricus  against  astrology.  Lucian's  personal  ex- 
periences with  this  Alexander  were  quite  interesting  but 
are  less  germane  to  our  investigation. 

^  De  defectu  oraculorum,  45. 


IX  ATTACKS  UPON  SUPERSTITION  279 

We  must  not  fail,  however,  to  note  another  essay,  Philo-  Magicai 
pseudes  or  Apiston,  in  which  the  superstition  and  pseudo-  fn^medr-^^ 
science  of  antiquity  are  sharply  satirized  in  what  purports  cine 
to  be  a  conversation  of  several  philosophers,  including  a 
Stoic,  a  Peripatetic,  and  a  Platonist,  and  a  representative  of 
ancient  medicine  in  the  person  of  Antigonus,  a  doctor.  Some 
of  the  magical  procedure  then  employed  in  curing  diseases 
is  first  satirized.  Cleodemus  the  Peripatetic  advises  as  a 
remedy  for  gout  to  take  in  the  left  hand  the  tooth  of  a  field 
mouse  which  has  been  killed  in  a  prescribed  manner,  to  wrap 
it  in  the  skin  of  a  lion  freshly-flayed,  and  thus  to  bind  it 
about  the  ailing  foot.  He  affirms  that  it  will  give  instant 
relief.  Dinomachus  the  Stoic  admits  that  the  occult  virtue 
of  the  lion  is  very  great  and  that  its  fat  or  right  fore-paw 
or  the  bristles  of  its  beard,  if  combined  with  the  proper 
incantations,  have  wonderful  efficacy.  But  he  holds  that  for 
the  cure  of  gout  the  skin  of  a  virgin  hind  would  be  superior 
on  the  ground  that  the  hind  is  speedier  than  the  lion  and  so 
more  beneficial  to  the  feet.  Cleodemus  retorts  that  he  used 
to  think  the  same,  but  that  a  Libyan  has  convinced  him  that 
the  lion  can  run  faster  than  the  hind  or  it  would  never  catch 
one.  The  sceptical  reporter  of  this  conversation  states  that 
he  vainly  attempted  to  convince  them  that  an  internal  disease 
could  not  be  cured  by  external  attachments  or  by  incanta- 
tions, methods  which  he  regards  as  the  veriest  sorcery 
(goefia). 

His  protests,  however,  merely  lead  Ion  the  Platonist  to  Snake; 
recount  how  a  Magus,  a  Chaldean  of  Babylonia,  cured  his  '^  ^^^^S- 
father's  gardener  who  had  been  stung  by  an  adder  on  the 
great  toe  and  was  already  all  swollen  up  and  nearly  dead. 
The  magician's  method  was  to  apply  a  splinter  of  stone  from 
the  statue  of  a  virgin  to  the  toe,  uttering  at  the  same  time 
an  incantation.  He  then  led  the  way  to  the  field  where  the 
gardener  had  been  stung;  pronounced  seven  sacred  names 
from  an  ancient  volume,  and  fumigated  the  place  thrice  with 
torches  and  sulphur.  All  the  snakes  in  the  field  then  came 
forth  from  their  holes  with  the  exception  of  one  very  aged 


2S0 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


A  Hyper- 
borean 
magician. 


Some 
ghost 
stories. 


Pancrates, 

the 

magician. 


and  decrepit  serpent,  whom  the  magician  sent  a  young  snake 
back  to  fetch.  Having  thus  assembled  every  last  serpent,  he 
blew  upon  them,  and  they  all  vanished  into  thin  air. 

This  tale  reminds  the  Stoic  of  another  magician,  a  bar- 
barian and  Hyperborean,  who  could  walk  through  fire  or 
upon  water  and  even  fly  through  the  air.  He  could  also 
"make  people  fall  in  love,  call  up  spirits,  resuscitate  corpses, 
bring  down  the  moon,  and  show  you  Hecate  herself  as  large 
as  life."  ^  More  specific  illustration  of  the  exercise  of  these 
powers  is  given  in  an  account  of  a  love  spell  which  he  per- 
formed for  a  young  man  for  a  big  fee.  Digging  a  trench, 
he  raised  the  ghost  of  the  youth's  father  and  also  summoned 
Hecate,  Cerberus,  and  the  Moon.  The  last  named  appeared 
in  three  successive  forms  of  a  woman,  an  ox,  and  a  puppy. 
The  sorcerer  then  constructed  a  clay  image  of  the  god  of 
love  and  sent  it  to  fetch  the  girl,  who  came  and  stayed  until 
cock-crow,  when  all  the  apparitions  vanished  with  her.  In 
vain  the  sceptic  argues  that  the  girl  in  question  would  have 
come  willingly  enough  without  any  magic.  The  Platonist 
matches  the  previous  story  with  one  of  a  Syrian  from  Pales- 
tine who  cast  out  demons. 

The  discussion  then  further  degenerates  into  ghost 
stories  and  tales  of  statuettes  that  leave  their  pedestals  after 
the  household  has  retired  for  the  night.  One  speaker  says 
that  he  no  longer  has  any  fear  of  ghosts  since  an  Arab  gave 
him  a  magic  ring  made  of  nails  from  crosses  and  taught  him 
an  incantation  to  use  against  spooks.  At  this  juncture  a 
Pythagorean  philosopher  of  great  repute  enters  and  adds  his 
testimony  in  the  form  of  an  account  of  how  he  laid  a  ghost 
at  Corinth  by  employing  an  Egyptian  incantation. 

Eucrates,  the  host,  then  tells  of  Pancrates,  whom  he  had 
met  in  Egypt  and  who  "had  spent  twenty-three  years  under- 
ground learning  magic  from  Isis,"  and  whom  crocodiles 
would  allow  to  ride  on  their  backs.  They  traveled  a  time 
together  without  a  servant,  since  Pancrates  was  able  to  dress 
up  the  door-bar  or  a  broom  or  pestle,  turn  it  into  human 
^  Fowler's  translation. 


IX  ATTACKS  UPON  SUPERSTITION  281 

form,  and  make  it  wait  upon  them.  There  follows  the 
familiar  story  of  Eucrates'  overhearing  the  incantation  of 
three  syllables  which  Pancrates  employed  and  of  trying  it 
out  himself  when  the  magician  was  absent.  The  pestle 
turned  into  human  form  all  right  enough  and  obeyed  his 
order  to  bring  in  water,  but  then  he  discovered  that  he  could 
not  make  it  stop,  and  when  he  seized  an  axe  and  chopped  it 
in  two,  the  only  effect  was  to  produce  two  water-carriers  in 
place  of  one. 

The  conversation  is  turning  to  the  subject  of  oracles  Credulity 
when  the  sceptic  can  stand  it  no  longer  and  retires  in  dis-  scepticism, 
gust.  As  he  tells  what  he  has  heard  to  a  friend,  he  remarks 
upon  the  childish  credulity  of  "these  admired  teachers  from 
whom  our  youth  are  to  learn  wisdom."  At  the  same  time, 
the  stories  seem  to  have  made  a  considerable  impression  even 
upon  him,  and  he  wishes  that  he  had  some  lethal  drug  to 
make  him  forget  all  these  monsters,  demons,  and  Hecates 
that  he  seems  still  to  see  before  him.  His  friend,  too,  de- 
clares that  he  has  filled  him  with  demons.  Their  dialogue 
then  concludes  with  the  consoling  reflection  that  truth  and 
sound  reason  are  the  best  drugs  for  the  cure  of  such  empty 
lies. 

The  Menippus  or  Necromancy,  while  an  obvious  imita-  Menippus, 
tion  and  parody  of  Odysseus'  mode  of  descent  to  the  under- 
world to  consult  Teiresias,  also  throws  some  light  on  the 
magic  of  Lucian's  time.  In  order  to  reach  the  other  world 
Menippus  went  to  Babylon  and  consulted  Mithrobarzanes, 
one  of  the  Magi  and  followers  of  Zoroaster.  He  is  also 
called  one  of  the  Chaldeans.  Besides  a  final  sacrifice 
similar  to  that  of  Odysseus,  the  procedure  by  which  the 
magician  procured  their  passage  to  the  other  world  included 
on  his  part  muttered  incantations  and  invocations,  for  the 
most  part  unintelligible  to  Menippus,  spitting  thrice  in  the 
latter's  face,  waving  torches  about,  drawing  a  magic  circle, 
and  wearing  a  magic  robe.  As  for  Menippus,  he  had  to 
bathe  in  the  Euphrates  at  sunrise  every  morning  for  the 
full  twenty-nine  days  of  a  moon,  after  which  he  was  purified 


tnancy. 


282 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Astrologi- 
cal inter- 
pretation 
of  Greek 
myth. 


at  midnight  in  the  Tigris  and  by  fumigation.  He  had  to 
sleep  out-of-doors  and  observe  a  special  diet,  not  look  any- 
one in  the  eye  on  his  way  home,  walk  backwards,  and  so 
on.  The  ultimate  result  of  all  these  preparations  was  that 
the  earth  was  burst  asunder  by  the  final  incantation  and  the 
way  to  the  underworld  laid  open.  When  it  came  time  to 
return  Menippus  crawled  up  with  difficulty,  like  Dante  going 
from  the  Inferno  to  Purgatory,  through  a  narrow  tunnel 
which  opened  on  the  shrine  of  Trophonius. 

An  essay  on  astrology  ascribed  to  Lucian  is  usually 
regarded  as  spurious.^  Denial  of  its  authenticity,  however, 
should  rest  on  such  grounds  as  its  literary  style  and  the 
manuscript  history  of  the  work  rather  than  upon  its — to 
modern  eyes — superstitious  character.  In  antiquity  a  man 
might  be  sceptical  about  most  superstitions  and  yet  believe 
in  astrology  as  a  science.  Lucian's  sceptical  friend  Celsus, 
for  example,  as  we  shall  see  in  our  chapter  on  Origen's 
Reply  to  Celsus,  believed  that  the  future  could  be  foretold 
from  the  stars.  And  whether  the  present  essay  is  genuine  or 
spurious,  it  is  certainly  noteworthy  that  for  all  his  mockery 
of  other  superstition  Lucian  does  not  attack  astrology  in  any 
of  his  essays.  Moreover,  this  essay  on  astrology  is  very 
sceptical  in  one  way,  since  it  denies  the  literal  truth  of  vari- 
ous Greek  myths  and  gives  an  astrological  interpretation  of 
them,  as  in  the  case  of  Zeus  and  Kronos  and  the  so-called 
adultery  of  Mars.  This  is  not  inconsistent  with  Lucian's 
ridicule  elsewhere  of  the  anthropomorphic  Olympian  divini- 
ties. What  Orpheus  taught  the  Greeks  was  astrology,  and 
the  planets  were  signified  by  the  seven  strings  of  his  lyre. 
Teiresias  taught  them  further  to  distinguish  which  stars  were 
masculine  and  which  feminine  in  character  and  influence. 
A  proper  interpretation  of  the  myth  of  Atreus  and  Thyestes 
also  shows  the  Greeks  at  an  early  date  acquainted  with  astro- 
logical doctrine.     Bellerophon  soared  to  the  sky,  not  on  a 


*  Fowler  omits  it.  It  appears  in 
the  Teubner  edition,  Luciani 
Samosatensis  opera,  ed.  C.  Jaco- 
bitz,   II    (1887),    187-95,  but  both 


Jacobitz  and  Dindorf  mark  it  as 
spurious.  Croiset,  Essai  sur  la 
vie  et  les  oouvrcs  de  Lucien,  Paris, 
1882,  p.  43,  also  rejects  it. 


IX  ATTACKS  UPON  SUPERSTITION  283 

horse  but  by  the  scientific  power  of  his  mind.  Daedalus 
taught  Icarus  astrology  and  the  fable  of  Phaethon  is  to  be 
similarly  interpreted.  Aeneas  was  not  really  the  son  of  the 
goddess  Venus,  nor  Minos  of  Jupiter,  nor  Aesculapius  of 
Mars,  nor  Autolycus  of  Mercury.  These  are  to  be  taken 
simply  as  the  planets  under  whose  rule  they  were  born. 
The  author  also  connects  Egyptian  animal  worship  with  the 
signs  of  the  zodiac. 

The  author  of  the  essay  also  delves  into  the  history  of  History 
astrology,  to  which  he  assigns  a  high  antiquity.  The  ^^^^^  ^'f 
Ethiopians  were  the  first  to  cultivate  it  and  handed  it  on  in  a  astrology, 
still  imperfect  stage  to  the  Egyptians  who  developed  it.  The 
Babylonians  claim  to  have  studied  it  before  other  peoples, 
but  our  author  thinks  that  they  did  so  long  after  the  Ethi- 
opians and  Egyptians.  The  Greeks  were  instructed  in  the 
art  neither  by  the  Ethiopians  nor  the  Egyptians,  but,  as  we 
have  seen,  by  Orpheus.  Our  author  not  only  states  that  the 
ancient  Greeks  never  built  towns  or  walls  or  got  married 
without  first  resorting  to  divination,  but  even  asserts  that 
astrology  was  their  sole  method  of  divination,  that  the 
Pythia  at  Delphi  was  the  type  of  celestial  purity  and  that  the 
snake  under  the  tripod  represented  the  dragon  among  the 
constellations,  Lycurgus  taught  his  Lacedaemonians  to  ob- 
serve the  moon,  and  only  the  uncultured  Arcadians  held 
themselves  aloof  from  astrology.  Yet  at  the  present  day 
some  oppose  the  art,  declaring  either  that  the  stars  have 
naught  to  do  with  human  affairs  or  that  astrology  is  useless 
since  what  is  fated  cannot  be  avoided.  To  the  latter  objec- 
tion our  author  makes  the  usual  retort  that  forewarned  is 
forearmed;  as  for  the  former  denial,  if  a  horse  stirs  the 
stones  in  the  road  as  it  runs,  if  a  passing  breath  of  wind 
moves  straws  to  and  fro,  if  a  tiny  flame  burns  the  finger,  will 
not  the  courses  and  deflexions  of  the  brilliant  celestial  bodies 
have  their  influence  upon  earth  and  mankind? 

The  manner  of  the  essay  does  not  seem  like  Lucian's  Lucian  not 
usual  style,  and  the  astrological  interpretation  of  religious   sceptical, 
myth  was  characteristic  of  the  Stoic  philosophy,  whereas 


2»4 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Lucian 

and 

medicine. 


Lucian's  philosophical  affinities,  if  he  can  be  said  to  have 
any,  are  perhaps  rather  with  the  Epicureans.  But  Celsus 
was  an  Epicurean  and  yet  believed  in  astrology.  It  must 
not  be  thought,  however,  that  Lucian  in  his  other  essays 
is  always  sceptical  in  regard  to  what  we  should  classify  as 
superstition.  He  tells  us  how  his  career  was  determined  by 
a  dream  in  the  autobiographical  essay  of  that  title.  In  the 
Dialogues  of  the  Gods  magic  is  mentioned  as  a  matter-of- 
course,  Zeus  complaining  that  he  has  to  resort  to  magic  in 
order  to  win  women  and  Athene  warning  Paris  to  have 
Aphrodite  remove  her  girdle,  since  it  is  drugged  or  enchanted 
and  may  bewitch  him. 

The  writings  of  Lucian  contain  many  allusions  to  the 
doctors,  diseases,  and  medicines  of  his  time.^  On  the  whole 
he  confirms  Galen's  picture.  Numerous  passages  show  that 
the  medical  profession  was  held  in  high  esteem,  and  Lucian 
himself  first  went  to  Rome  in  order  to  consult  an  oculist. 
At  the  same  time  Lucian  satirizes  the  quacks  and  medical 
superstition  of  the  time,  as  we  have  already  seen,  and 
describes  several  statues  which  were  believed  to  possess  heal- 
ing powers.  In  the  burlesque  tragedy  on  gout,  Tragodopo- 
dagra,  whose  authenticity,  however,  is  questioned,  the  dis- 
ease personified  is  triumphant,  and  the  moral  seems  to  be 
that  all  the  remedies  which  men  have  tried  are  of  no  avail. 
On  the  other  hand,  Lucian  wrote  seriously  of  the  African 
snake  whose  bite  causes  one  to  die  of  thirst  {De  dipsadibus). 
He  admits  that  he  has  never  seen  anyone  in  this  condition 
and  has  not  even  been  in  Libya  where  these  snakes  are 
found,  but  a  friend  has  assured  him  that  he  has  seen  the 
tombstone  epitaph  of  a  man  who  had  died  thus,  a  rather 
indirect  mode  of  proof  which  we  are  surprised  should  satisfy 
the  author  of  How  to  Write  History.  Lucian  also  repeats 
the  common  notion  that  persons  bitten  by  a  mad  dog  can 
be  cured  only  by  a  hair  or  other  portion  of  the  same  animal.^ 

^  See  the  interesting  paper  of  J.  Proceedings  of  the  Royal  Society 
D.  Rolleston,  "Lucian  and  Medi-  of  Medicine,  VIII,  49-58,  72-84. 
cine,"  1915,  23  pp.,  reprinted  from  *  See  the  close  of  Nigrinus. 


IX  ATTACKS  UPON  SUPERSTITION  285 

Our  chapter  which  set  out  to  note  cases  of  scepticism  Inevitable 

in  regard  to  superstition  has  ended  by  including  a  great  gHng"of ' 

deal  of  such  superstition.     The   sceptics  themselves   seem  scepticism 

,  T      •     .         •  1  ^"^  super- 

credulous  on  some  pomts,  and  Lucian  s  satire  perhaps  more  stition. 

reveals  than  refutes  the  prevalence  of  superstition  among 
even  the  highly  educated.  The  same  is  true  of  other  literary 
satirists  of  the  Roman  Empire  whose  jibes  against  the 
astrologers  and  their  devotees  only  attest  the  popularity  of 
the  art  and  who  themselves  very  probably  meant  only  to 
ridicule  its  more  extreme  pretensions  and  were  perhaps  at 
bottom  themselves  believers  in  the  fundamentals  of  the  art. 
Our  authors  to  some  extent,  as  we  have  pointed  out,  pro- 
vided an  arsenal  of  arguments  from  which  later  Christian 
writers  took  weapons  for  their  assaults  upon  pagan  magic 
and  astrology.  But  sometimes  subsequent  writers  confused 
scepticism  with  credulity,  and  the  influence  of  our  authors 
upon  them  became  just  the  opposite  of  what  they  intended. 
Thus  Ammianus  Marcellinus,  the  soldier-historian  of  the 
falling  Roman  Empire  upon  whom  Gibbon  placed  so  much 
reliance,  was  so  attached  to  divination  that  he  even  quoted 
its  arch-opponent,  Cicero,  in  support  of  it.  For  he  actually 
concludes  his  discussion  of  the  subject  in  these  words : 
"Wherefore  in  this  as  in  other  matters  Tully  says  most 
admirably,  'Signs  of  future  events  are  shown  by  the 
gods.'  "  1 

But  in  order  to  conclude  our  chapter  on  scepticism  with  Lucian  on 
a  less  obscurantist  passage,  let  us  return  to  Lucian.  His  J^jg^Q^y 
essay.  How  to  Write  History,  gives  serious  expression  to 
those  ideals  of  truth  and  impartiality  which  also  lie  behind 
his  mockery  of  impostors  and  the  over-credulous.  "The 
historian's  one  task,"  in  his  estimation,  "is  to  tell  the  thing 
as  it  happened."  He  should  be  "fearless,  incorruptible,  in- 
dependent, a  believer  in  frankness,  ...  an  impartial  judge, 
kind  to  all  but  too  kind  to  none."  "He  has  to  make  of  his 
brain  a  mirror,  unclouded,  bright,  and  true  of  surface." 
"Facts  are  not  to  be  collected  at  haphazard  but  with  careful, 
^  Rerum  gestarum  libri  qui  supersunt,  XXI,   i,    14. 


286  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE   chap,  ix 

laborious,  repeated  investigation."  "Prefer  the  disinterested 
account."  ^  Such  sentences  and  phrases  as  these  reveal  a 
scientific  and  critical  spirit  of  high  order  and  seem  a  vast 
improvement  upon  the  frailty  of  Cicero's  historical  criticism. 
But  how  far  Lucian  would  have  been  able  to  follow  his  own 
advice  is  perhaps  another  matter. 

^The  wording  of  these  excerpts  is  that  of  Fowler's  translation. 


CHAPTER  X 

THE  SPURIOUS  MYSTIC  WRITINGS  OF  HERMES,  ORPHEUS, 
AND  ZOROASTER 

Mystic  works  of  revelation — The  Hermetic  books — Poimandres  and 
the  Hermetic  Corpus — Astrological  treatises  ascribed  to  Hermes — 
Hermetic  works  of  alchemy — Nechepso  and  Petosiris — Manetho — The 
Lithica  of  Orpheus — Argument  of  the  poem — Magic  powers  of  stones 
— Magic  rites  to  gain  powers  of  divination — Power  of  gems  compared 
with  herbs — Magic  herbs  and  demons  in  Orphic  rites — Books  ascribed  to 
Zoroaster — The  Chaldean  Oracles. 

There  were  in  circulation  in  the  Roman  Empire  many  writ-  Mystic 
ings  which  purported  to  be  of  divine  origin  and  authorship,  ^velation. 
or  at  least  the  work  of  ancient  culture-heroes  and  founders 
of  religions  who  were  of  divine  descent  and  divinely  in- 
spired. These  oracular  and  mystic  compositions  usually 
pretend  to  great  antiquity  and  often  claim  as  their  home 
such  hoary  lands  as  Egypt  and  Chaldea,  although  in  the 
Hellenic  past  Apollo  and  in  the  Roman  past  the  Sibylline 
books  ^  also  afford  convenient  centers  about  which  forgeries 
cluster.  Assuming  as  these  writings  do  to  disclose  the 
secrets  of  ancient  priesthoods  and  to  publish  what  should 
not  be  revealed  to  the  vulgar  crowd,  they  may  be  confidently 
expected  to  embody  a  great  deal  of  superstition  and  magic 
along  with  their  expositions  of  mystic  theologies.  Also  the 
authors,  editors,  or  publishers  of  astrological,  alchemistic, 
and  other  pseudo-scientific  treatises  could  not  be  expected 
to  resist  the  temptation  of  claiming  a  venerable  and  cryptic 
origin  for  some  of  their  books.  Moreover,  such  pseudo- 
literature  was  not  entirely  unjustified  in  its  affirmation  of 
high  antiquity.  Few  things  in  intellectual  history  antedate 
magic,  and  these  spurious  compositions  are  not  especially 

*  See  Sackur,  Sibyllinische  Texte  und  Forschiingen,  Halle,  1898;  Alex- 
andre, Oracida  Sibyllina,  2nd  ed.,  Paris,  1869;  Charles  (1913)  H,  368  ff. 

287 


288  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

distinguished  by  new  ideas,  although  they  to  some  extent 
reflect  the  progress  made  in  learning,  occult  as  well  as  scien- 
tific, in  the  Hellenistic  age.  It  must  be  added  that  much  of 
their  contents  depends  for  its  effect  entirely  upon  its  claim 
to  eminent  authorship  and  great  antiquity  and  upon  the  im- 
pressionability of  its  public.  To-day  most  of  it  seems 
trivial  commonplace  or  marked  by  the  empty  vagueness 
characteristic  of  oracular  utterances.  I  shall  attempt  no 
complete  exposition  or  exhaustive  treatment  of  such  writ- 
ings ^  but  touch  upon  a  few  examples  which  bear  upon  the 
relations  of  science  and  magic. 
The  Chief  among  these  are  the  Hermetic  books  or  writings 

books.  attributed  to  Hermes  the  Egyptian  or  Trismegistus.   "Under 

this  name,"  wrote  Steinschneider  in  1906,  "there  exists  in 
many  languages  a  literature,  for  the  most  part  superstitious, 
which  seems  to  have  not  yet  been  treated  in  its  totality."  ^ 
The  Egyptian  god  Thoth  or  Tehuti,  known  in  Greek  as 
OioW,  QccO,  and  Tar,  was  identified  with  Hermes,  and  the 
epithet  "thrice-great"  is  also  derived  from  the  Egyptian 
aa  aa,  "the  great  Great."  Citations  of  works  ascribed  to  this 
Hermes  Trismegistus  can  be  traced  back  as  early  as  the  first 
century  of  our  era.^  He  is  also  mentioned  or  quoted  by 
various  church  fathers  from  Athenagoras  to  Augustine  and 
often  figures  in  the  magical  papyri.  The  historian  Ammi- 
anus  Marcellinus  ^  in  the  fourth  century  ranks  him  with  the 
great  sages  of  the  past  such  as  Pythagoras,  Socrates,  and 
Apollonius  of  Tyana.  Our  two  chief  descriptions  of  the 
Hermetic  books  from  the  period  of  the  Roman  Empire  are 
found  in  the  Stromata^  of  the  Christian  Clement  of  Alex- 
andria (C.150-C.220  A.D.)  and  in  the  De  mysteriis^ 
ascribed  to  the  Neo-Platonist  lamblichus   (died  about  330 

*  Besides  the  works  to  be  cited  ^Steinschneider  (1906),  24.     He 

later   in   this    chapter,    the    reader  mentions    the    dissertation    of    R. 

may   consult :      A.    Dieterich,   Ab-  Pietschmann,   Hermes   Trismegis- 

raxas   (Studien  z.  relig.  gcsch.  d.  tus,  Leipzig,  1875. 

.y/)af.  a/^.),  Leipzig,  1891,  especially  ^  See    Galen,    citing    Pamphilus, 

chapter  II    (pp.    I36ff.),  "Jiidisch-  Kuhn,  XI,  798. 

orphisch-gnostiche   Kulte  und   die  *  XXI,   14,   15. 

Zauberbiicher"  ;  and  G.  A.  Lobeck,  '  VI,  4. 

Aglaophanms,  1829,  2  vols.  *I,  IJ  VIII,  1-4. 


X  SPURIOUS  MYSTIC  WRITINGS  289 

A.  D.).  Clement  speaks  of  forty-two  books  by  Hermes 
which  are  regarded  as  "indispensable."  Of  these  ten  are 
called  "Hieratic"  and  deal  with  the  laws,  the  gods,  and  the 
training  of  the  priests.  Ten  others  detail  the  sacrifices, 
prayers,  processions,  festivals,  and  other  rites  of  Egyptian 
worship.  Two  contain  hymns  to  the  gods  and  rules  for 
the  king.  Six  are  medical,  "treating  of  the  structure  of  the 
body  and  of  diseases  and  instruments  and  medicines  and 
about  the  eyes  and  the  last  about  women."  Four  are  astro- 
nomical or  astrological,  and  the  remaining  ten  deal  with 
cosmography  and  geography  or  with  the  equipment  of  the 
priests  and  the  paraphernalia  of  the  sacred  rites.  Clement 
does  not  say  so,  but  from  his  brief  summary  one  can 
imagine  how  full  these  volumes  probably  were  of  occult 
virtues  of  natural  substances,  of  magical  procedure,  and  of 
intimate  relations  and  interactions  between  nature,  stars, 
and  spirits.  lamblichus  repeats  the  statement  of  Seleucus 
that  Hermes  wrote  twenty  thousand  volumes  and  the  asser- 
tion of  Manetho  that  there  were  36,525  books,  a  number 
doubtless  connected  with  the  supposed  length  of  the  year, 
three  hundred  and  sixty-five  and  one-quarter  days.^ 
lamblichus  adds  that  Hermes  wrote  one  hundred  treatises 
on  the  ethereal  gods  and  one  thousand  concerning  the 
celestial  gods.^  He  is  aware,  however,  that  most  books 
attributed  to  Hermes  were  not  really  composed  by  him, 
since  in  other  passages  he  speaks  of  "the  books  which  are 
circulated  under  the  name  of  Hermes,"  ^  and  explains  that 
"our  ancestors  .  ,  .  inscribed  all  their  own  writings  with 
the  name  of  Hermes,"  *  thus  dedicating  them  to  him  as  the 
patron  deity  of  language  and  theology.  By  the  time  of 
lamblichus  these  books  had  been  translated  from  the  Egyp- 
tian tongue  into  Greek. 

There  has  come  down  to  us  under  the  name  of  Hermes  Poiman- 
a  collection  of  seventeen  or  eighteen   fragments  which  is   hermetic  ^ 
generally  known  as  the  Hermetic  Corpus.     Of  the   frag-  Corpus. 

'VIII,  I.  'VIII,  4. 

"VIII,  2.  n,  I. 


290  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

ments  the  first  and  chief  is  entitled  Poimandres  {HoLnavbp-qs), 
a  name  which  is  sometimes  apphed  to  the  entire  Corpus. 
Another  fragment  entitled  Asclepius,  since  it  is  in  the  form 
of  a  dialogue  between  him  and  "Mercurius  Trismegis- 
tus,"  exists  in  a  Latin  form  which  has  been  ascribed  probably 
incorrectly  to  Apuleius  of  Madaura  as  translator  {Asclepius 
.  .  .  Mercurii  trismegisti  dialogus  Lucio  Apuleio  Madau- 
rensi  philosopho  Platonico  interprete) .  None  of  the  Greek 
manuscripts  of  the  Corpus  seems  older  than  the  fourteenth 
century,  although  Reitzenstein  thinks  that  they  may  all  be 
derived  from  the  version  which  Michael  Psellus  had  before 
him  in  the  eleventh  century.^  But  the  concluding  prayer 
of  the  Poimandres  exists  in  a  third  century  papyrus,  and  the 
alchemist  Zosimus  in  the  fourth  century  seems  acquainted 
with  the  entire  collection.  The  treatises  in  this  Corpus  are 
concerned  primarily  with  religious  philosophy  or  theosophy, 
with  doctrines  similar  to  those  of  Plato  concerning  the  soul 
and  to  the  teachings  of  the  Gnostics,  The  moral  and  re- 
ligious instruction  is  associated,  however,  with  a  physics  and 
cosmology  very  favorable  to  astrology  and  magic.  Of  magic 
in  the  narrow  sense  there  is  little  in  the  Corpus,  but  a 
Hermetic  fragment  preserved  by  Stobaeus  affirms  that 
"philosophy  and  magic  nourish  the  soul."  Astrology  plays 
a  much  more  prominent  part,  and  the  stars  are  ranked  as 
visible  gods,  of  whom  the  sun  is  by  far  the  greatest.  All 
seven  planets  nevertheless  control  the  changes  in  the  world 
of  nature;  there  are  seven  human  types  corresponding  to 
them;  and  the  twelve  signs  of  the  zodiac  also  govern  the 
human  body.  Only  the  chosen  few  who  possess  gnosis  or 
are  capable  of  receiving  nous  can  escape  the  decrees  of  fate 
as  administered  by  the  stars  and  ultimately  return  to  the 
spiritual  world,  passing  through  "choruses  of  demons"  and 
"courses  of  stars"  and  reaching  the  Ogdoad  or  eighth  heaven 
above  and  beyond  the  spheres  of  the  seven  planets. ^     Such 

'R.     Reitzenstein,     Poimatuires,  ^Citations    supporting    this    and 

Leipzig,   1904,  p.  319.     This  work  the    preceding    sentences    may    be 

is   the    fullest    scientific   treatment  found      in      Kroll's      article      on 

of  the  subject.  Hermes    Trismegistus    in    Pauly- 


SPURIOUS  MYSTIC  WRITINGS 


291 


Gnostic  cosmology  and  demonolog}%  especially  the  location 
of  demons  amid  the  planetary  spheres,  provides  favorable 
ground  for  the  development  of  astrological  necromancy. 

Not  only  is  a  belief  in  astrology  implied  throughout  the  Astro- 
Poimandres,  but  a  number  of  separate  astrological  treatises  treatises 
are  extant  in  whole  or  part  under  the  name  of  Hermes  Tris-  |jcnbed  to 
megistus/  and  he  is  frequently  cited  as  an  authority  in  other 
Greek   astrological   manuscripts.-     The  treatises  attributed 
to  him  comprise  one  upon  general  method,^  one  on  the  names 
and  powers  of  the  twelve  .signs,  one  on  astrological  medicine 
addressed  to  Ammon  the  Egyptian,^  one  on  thunder  and 
lightning,  and  some  hexameters  on  the  relation  of  earth- 
quakes to  the  signs  of  the  zodiac.    This  last  is  also  ascribed 
to  Orpheus.^     There  are  various  allusions  to  and  versions 
of  tracts  concerning  the  relation  of  herbs  to  the  planets  or 
signs  of  the  zodiac  or  thirty-six  decans.®     These  treatises 
attribute  magic  virtues  to  plants,   include  a  prayer  to  be 
repeated  when  plucking  each  herb,  and  tell  how  to  use  the 


Wissowa,  809-820.  The  Poiman- 
dres  was  translated  into  English 
by  John  Everard,  D.D.,  a  mystic 
but  also  a  popular  preacher  whose 
outspoken  sermons  caused  his  fre- 
quent arrest  and  imprisonment 
during  the  reigns  of  James  I  and 
Charles  I.  James  is  reported  to 
have  said  of  him,  "What  is  this 
Dr.  Ever-out?  Hi?  name  shall  be 
Dr.  Never-out,"  {Diet.  Nat.  Biog,). 
Dr.  Everard's  translation  was 
printed  in  1650  and  again  in  1657 
when  the  "Asclepius"  was  added 
to  it.  In  1884  it  appeared  again 
in  the  Bath  Occult  Reprint  Series 
with  an  introduction  by  Hargrave 
Jennings,  and  the  second  volume 
in  the  same  series  was  Hermes' 
The  Virgin  of  the  World,  pub- 
lished at  London.  Kroll  mentions 
only  the  more  recent  translation 
by  Mead,  Thrice  Greatest  Her- 
mes.    London,  1906. 

^  Consult     the     bibliography     in 
Kroll's  article  in   Pauly-Wissowa. 

'  See    the    various    volumes    of 


Catalogiis  codicum  astrologorum 
Graecorum,  passim. 

^  Unprinted. 

■*  An  English  translation  by 
John  Harvey  was  printed  in  Lon- 
don, 1657,  i2mo.  It  also  exists  in 
manuscript  form  in  the  British 
Museum ;  Sloane  1734,  fols.  283- 
98,  "The  learned  work  of  Hermes 
Trismegistus  intituled  hys  Phis- 
icke  Mathematycke  or  Mathe- 
maticall  Physickes,  direct  to  Ham- 
mon  Kinge  of  Egvpte." 

'Orphica,  ed.  Abel  (1885),  p. 
141. 

"  It  was  to  a  work  on  this  last 
subject  that  Pamphilus,  cited  by 
Galen,  referred  in  mentioning  the 
herb  aerov,  but  this  plant  is  not 
named  in  the  extant  treatise  on 
the  decans.  Such  treatises  are 
more  or  less  addressed  to  As- 
clepius :  printed  in  J.  B.  Pitra, 
Analecta  Sacra,  V,  ii,  279-go; 
Cat.  cod.  antral.  Grace.  IV,  134; 
VI,  83;  VII,  231;  VIII,  ii,  159; 
VIII,  iii,  151;  and  by  Ruelle,  Rev. 
Phil,  XXXII,  247. 


292 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Hermetic 
works  of 
alchemy. 


Nechepso 

and 

Petosiris. 


Manetho. 


astrological  figures  of  the  decans,  engraved  on  stones,  as 
healing  amulets. 

Works  under  the  name  of  Hermes  Trismegistus  are 
cited  by  Greek  alchemists  of  the  closing  Roman  Empire,  such 
as  Zosimus,  Stephanus,  and  Olympiodorus,  but  those  Her- 
metic treatises  of  alchemy  which  are  extant  are  of  late  date 
and  much  altered. ■"•  Some  treatises  are  preserved  only  in 
Arabic;  others  are  medieval  Latin  fabrications.  The  Greek 
alchemists,  however,  seem  to  have  recited  the  mystic  hymn 
of  Hermes  from  the  Poimandres? 

Hellenistic  and  Roman  astrology  sought  to  extend  its 
roots  far  back  into  Egyptian  antiquity  by  putting  forth 
spurious  treatises  under  the  names,  not  only  of  Hermes 
Trismegistus,  but  also  of  Nechepso  and  Petosiris,^  who  were 
regarded  respectively  as  an  Egyptian  king  and  an  Egyptian 
priest  who  had  lived  at  least  seven  centuries  before  Christ. 
Indeed,  they  were  held  to  be  the  recipients  of  divine  revela- 
tion from  Hermes  and  Asclepius.  A  lengthy  astrological 
treatise,  which  Pliny  ^  is  the  first  to  cite  and  from  a  four- 
teenth book  of  which  Galen  ^  mentions  a  magic  ring  of 
jasper  engraved  with  a  dragon  and  rays,  seems  to  have 
appeared  in  their  names  probably  at  Alexandria  in  the 
Hellenistic  period.  Only  fragments  and  citations  ascribed 
to  Nechepso  and  Petosiris  are  now  extant.^ 

Yet  another  astrological  work  which  claims  to  be  drawn 
from  the  secret  sacred  books  and  cryptic  monuments  of 
ancient  Egypt  is  ascribed  to  Manetho.     It  is  a  compilation 


^Berthelot  (1885),  pp.  133-6,  and 
his  article  on  Hermes  Trisme- 
gistus in  La  Grande  Encyclopedie; 
also  Kroll  on  Hermes  in  Pauly- 
Wissowa,  799. 

'Berthelot    (1885),  p.    134. 

*  Bouche-Leclercq,  L'Astrologie 
grecque,  1899,  PP-  xi,  519-20, 
563-4- 

*NH,  n,  21;  VH,  50. 

"Kiihn,  Xn,  207. 

"They  have  been  collected  and 
edited  by  E.  Riess,  Ncchepsonis 
et  Petosiridis  frag'menta  niagica, 
in  Philologus,  Supplbd.  VI,   Got- 


tingen  (1891-93),  pp.  323-394-  See 
also  F.  Boll,  Die  Erforschung  der 
antikcn  Astrologie,  in  Neue  Jahrb. 
fiir  das  klass.  Altert.,  XI  (1908), 
p.  106,  and  his  dissertation  of  the 
same  title  published  at  Bonn,  1890. 
I  have  found  that  Riess,  while  in- 
cluding some  of  the  passages  at- 
tributed to  Nechepso  by  the  sixth 
century  medical  writer,  Aetius, 
seems  to  have  overlooked  the 
"Emplastrum  Nechepsonis  e  cu- 
presso,"  Aetius,  Tetrabibl.,  IV, 
Sermo  III,  cap.  19  (p.  771  in  the 
edition  of  Stephanus,  15^). 


X  SPURIOUS  MYSnC  WRITINGS  293 

in  verse  of  prognostications  from  the  various  constellations 
and  is  regarded  as  the  work  of  several  writers,  of  whom 
the  oldest  is  placed  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  Severus  in  the 
third  century.^ 

Orpheus  is  another  author  more  cited  than  preserved  by  The 
classical  antiquity.  Pliny  called  him  the  first  writer  on  herbs  Orpheus, 
and  suspected  him  of  magic.  Ernest  Riess  affirms  that 
Rohde  (Psyche,  p.  398)  "has  abundantly  proved  that 
Orpheus'  followers  were  among  the  chief  promulgators  of 
purifications  and  charms  against  evil  spirits."  ^  Among 
poems  of  some  length  extant  under  Orpheus'  name  the  one 
of  most  interest  to  us  is  the  Lithica,  where  in  770  lines  the 
virtues  of  some  thirty  gems  are  set  forth  with  considerable 
allusion  to  magic.^  The  authorship  is  uncertain,  but  the 
verse  is  supposed  to  follow  the  prose  treatise  by  Damigeron 
who  lived  in  the  second  century  B.  C.  The  date  of  the  poem 
is  now  generally  fixed  in  the  fourth  century  of  our  era, 
although  King  ^  argued  for  an  earlier  date.  I  agree  with 
him  that  the  allusion  in  lines  71-74  to  decapitation  on  the 
charge  of  magic  is,  taken  alone,  too  vague  and  blind  to  be 
associated  with  any  particular  event  or  time;  editors  since 
Tyrwhitt  have  connected  it  with  the  law  of  Constantius 
against  magic  and  the  persecution  of  magicians  in  371  A.  D. 
But  King's  contention  that  the  Lithica  is  by  the  same  author 
as  the  Argonaiitica,  also  ascribed  to  Orpheus,  and  is  there- 
fore of  early  date,  falls  to  the  ground  since  the  Argonaiitica, 
too,  is  now  dated  in  the  fourth  century. 

^  Bouche-Leclercq,    L'Astrologie  rus     texts     in     the     Cunningham 

grecquc,    1898,    p.    xiii.    Axt    and  Memoirs  of  the  Royal  Irish  Acad- 

Riegler,  Manethonis  Apotclesmati-  emy. 

corum    libri    sex     Cologne,    1832.  3  ^j^^  ^^^^^  ^^^^  ^^  ^^^  Lithica 

Also  edited  by  Koechly.  is    contained    in    Orphica,    ed.    E. 

_*_E.    Riess,    On   Ancient    Super-  Abel,  Lipsiae  et  Pragae,  1885.     A 

stition,     in     Transactions    Ameri-  rather     too     free     English     verse 

can        Philological        Association  translation,     Orpheus     on     Gems, 

(1895),     XXVI,     40-55.     Grenfell  is  given  in  C.  W.  King,  T/j^ /v^a/M- 

(1921),  p.   151,  announces  that  J.  ral  History,  Ancient  and  Modern, 

G.   Smyly  is   about  to  publish  "a  of  Precious  Stones  and  Gems  and 

remarkable  fragment  of  an  Orphic  of  Precious  Metals,  London,  1865. 

ritual"    among  some  thirty   papy-  *  Pp.   397-98. 


294 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Argument 
of  the 
poem. 


Magic 
powers  of 
stones. 


The  Lithica  opens  by  representing  Hermes  as  bestowing 
upon  mankind  the  precious  lore  of  the  marvelous  virtues  of 
gems.  In  his  cave  are  stored  stones  which  banish  ghosts, 
robbers,  and  snakes,  which  bring  health,  happiness,  victory 
in  war  and  games,  honor  at  courts  and  success  in  love,  and 
which  insure  safety  on  journeys,  the  favor  of  the  gods,  and 
enable  one  to  read  the  hidden  thoughts  of  others  and  to 
understand  the  language  of  the  birds  as  they  predict  the 
future.  Few  persons,  however,  avail  themselves  of  this 
mystic  lore,  and  those  who  do  so  are  liable  to  be  executed 
on  the  charge  of  magic.  After  this  introduction,  which  may 
be  regarded  as  a  piquant  appetizer  to  whet  the  reader's  taste 
for  further  details,  the  virtues  of  individual  stones  are 
described,  first  in  the  words  of  Theodamas,  a  wise  and  divine 
man  ^  whom  the  author  meets  on  his  way  to  perform  annual 
sacrifice  at  an  altar  of  the  Sun,  where  as  a  child  he  narrowly 
escaped  from  a  deadly  snake,  and  then  in  a  speech  of  the 
seer  Helenus  to  Philoctetes  which  Theodamas  quotes.  Greek 
gods  are  often  mentioned;  as  the  poem  proceeds  the  virtues 
of  a  number  of  gems  are  attributed  to  Apollo  rather  than 
Hermes;  and  there  are  allusions  to  Greek  mythology  and 
the  Trojan  war.  Some  gems  are  found  in  animals,  for  in- 
stance, in  the  viper  or  the  brain  of  the  stag. 

Let  us  turn  to  some  examples  of  the  marvelous  virtues 
of  particular  stones.  The  crystal  wins  favorable  answers 
from  the  gods  to  prayers;  kindles  fire,  if  held  over  sticks, 
yet  itself  remains  cold;  as  a  ligature  benefits  kidney  trouble. 
Sacrifices  in  which  the  adamant  is  employed  win  the  favor 
of  the  gods ;  it  is  also  called  Lethaean  because  it  makes  one 
forget  worries,  or  the  milk-stone  (galactis)  because  it  re- 
news the  milk  of  sheep  or  goats  when  powdered  in  brine  and 
sprinkled  over  them.  Worn  as  an  amulet  it  counteracts  the 
evil  eye  and  gains  royal  favor  for  its  bearer.  The  agate  is 
an  agricultural  amulet  and  should  be  attached  to  the  plow- 
man's arm  and  the  horns  of  the  oxen.  Other  stones  help 
vineyards,  bring  rain  or  avert  hail  and  pests  from  the  crops. 

*  Line  94,  Trfpl<f>povi  QeioddfiavTL',  line   1 65,  baiixovio^  <i>^s. 


X  SPURIOUS  MYSTIC  WRITINGS  295 

Lychnis  prevents  a  pot  from  boiling  on  a  fire  and  makes  it 
boil  when  the  fire  is  dead.  The  magnet  was  used  by  the 
witches  Circe  and  Medea  in  their  spells;  an  unchaste  wife 
is  unable  to  remain  in  the  bed  where  this  stone  has  been 
placed  with  an  incantation.  Other  stones  cure  snake-bite 
and  various  diseases,  serve  as  love-charms  or  aids  in  child- 
birth, or  counteract  incantations  and  enchantments. 

To  make  the  gem  sidcritis  or  oreites  utter  vocal  oracles  Magic 
the  operator  must  abstain  for  three  weeks  from  animal  food,  ^^^^ 

the  public  baths,  and  the  marriage  bed ;  he  is  then  to  wash  P?wers  of 

.     ^  ,  ,  .  .      divination, 

and  clothe  the  gem  like  an  mfant  and  employ  various  sacri- 
fices, incantations,  and  illuminations.  The  gem  Liparaios, 
known  to  the  learned  Magi  of  Assyria,  when  burnt  on  a 
bloodless  altar  with  hymns  to  the  Sun  and  Earth  attracts 
snakes  from  their  holes  to  the  flame.  Three  youths  robed 
in  white  and  carrying  two-edged  swords  should  cut  up  the 
snake  who  comes  nearest  the  fire  into  nine  pieces,  three  for 
the  Sun,  three  for  the  earth,  three  for  the  wise  and  prophetic 
maiden.  These  pieces  are  then  to  be  cooked  with  wine,  salt, 
and  spices  and  eaten  by  those  who  wish  to  learn  the  language 
of  birds  and  beasts.  But  further  the  gods  must  be  invoked 
by  their  secret  names  and  libations  poured  of  milk,  wine, 
oil,  and  honey.  What  is  not  eaten  must  be  buried,  and  the 
participants  in  the  feast  are  then  to  return  home  wearing 
chaplets  but  otherwise  naked  and  speaking  to  no  one  whom 
they  may  meet.  On  their  arrival  home  they  are  to  sacrifice 
mixed  spices.  It  will  be  recalled  that  Apollonius  of  Tyana 
and  the  Arabs  also  learned  the  language  of  the  birds  by 
eating  snake-flesh. 

Thus  gems  are  potent  in  religion  and  divination,  love-   Powers 
charms  and  child-birth,  medicine  and  agriculture.    The  poem  compared 
fails,  however,  to  touch  upon  their  uses  in  alchemy  or  rela-  with  herbs, 
tions  to  the  stars,  nor  does  it  contain  much  of  anything  that 
can  be  called  necromancy.     But  the  author  ranks  the  virtues 
of  stones  above  those  of  herbs,  whose  powers  disappear  with 
age.    Moreover,  some  plants  are  injurious,  whereas  the  mar- 
velous virtues  of  stones  are  almost  all  beneficial  as  well  as 


296 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Magic 
herbs  and 
demons  in 
Orphic 
rites. 


Books 
ascribed  to 
Zoroaster. 


permanent.  "There  is  great  force  in  herbs,"  he  says,  "but 
far  greater  in  stones,"  ^  an  observation  often  repeated  in 
the  middle  ages. 

More  stress  is  laid  upon  the  power  of  demons  and  herbs 
in  a  description  which  has  been  left  us  by  Saint  Cyprian,^ 
bishop  of  Antioch  in  the  third  century,  of  some  pagan  mys- 
teries upon  Mount  Olympus  into  which  he  was  initiated 
when  a  boy  of  fifteen  and  which  have  been  explained  as 
Orphic  rites.  His  initiation  was  under  the  charge  of  seven 
hierophants,  lasted  for  forty  days,  and  included  instruction 
in  the  virtues  of  magic  herbs  and  visions  of  the  operations 
of  demons.  He  was  also  taught  the  meaning  of  musical 
notes  and  harmonies,  and  saw  how  times  and  seasons  were 
governed  by  good  and  evil  spirits.  In  short,  magic,  pseudo- 
science,  occult  virtue,  and  perhaps  astrology  formed  an 
important  part  of  Orphic  lore. 

Cumont  states  in  his  Oriental  Religions  in  Roman 
Paganism  that  "towards  the  end  of  the  Alexandrine  period 
the  books  ascribed  to  the  half -mythical  masters  of  the 
Persian  science,  Zoroaster,  Hosthanes  and  Hystaspes,  were 
translated  into  Greek,  and  until  the  end  of  paganism  those 
names  enjoyed  a  prodigious  authority."  ^  Pliny  regarded 
Zoroaster  as  the  founder  of  magic  and  we  have  met 
other  examples  of  his  reputation  as  a  magician.  Later 
we  shall  find  him  cited  several  times  in  the  Byzantine 
Geoponica  which  seems  to  use  a  book  ascribed  to  him  on 
the  sympathy  and  antipathy  existing  between  natural 
objects.^  Naturally  a  number  of  pseudo-Zoroastrian  books 
were  in  circulation,  some  of  which  Porphyry,  the  Neo- 
Platonist,  is  said  to  have  suppressed.  At  least  he  tells  us  in 
his  Life  of  Plotinus  ^  that  certain  Christians  and  other  men 

'Lines  410-41 1. 


'  Confessio  S.  Cypriani,  in  Acta 
Sanctorum,  ed.  BoUandists,  Sept., 
VII,  222;  L.  Preller,  Philologus 
(1846),  I,  349ff.;  cited  by  A.  B. 
Cook,  Zeus,  Cambridge,  1914,  I, 
iio-iii.    The  work  is  treated  more 


fully  below  in  Chapter  18. 

^  Franz  Cumont,  op.  cit.,  Chi- 
cago, 191 1,  p.  189.  See  also 
Windischmann,  Zoroastrische  Stu- 
dien,  Berlin,  1863. 

*  See  below,  Chapter  26. 
"Cap.   16. 


X  SPURIOUS  MYSTIC  WRITINGS  297 

claimed  to  possess  certain  revelations  of  Zoroaster,  but  that 

he  advanced  many  arguments  to  show  that  their  book  was 

not  written  by  Zoroaster  but  was  a  recent  composition. 

There  has  been  preserved,  however,  in  the  writings  of    J^^ 

,,       .  r  1  1        Chaldean 

the  Neo-Platonists  a  collection  of  passages  known  as  the    Oracles. 

Zoroastrian  Logia  or  Chaldean  Oracles  ^  and  which  "present 
...  a  heterogeneous  mass,  now  obscure  and  again  bom- 
bastic, of  commingled  Platonic,  Pythagorean,  Stoic,  Gnostic, 
and  Persian  tenets."  ^  Not  only  are  these  often  cited  by 
the  Neo-Platonists,  but  Porphyry,  lamblichus,  and  Proclus 
composed  commentaries  upon  them.^  Some  think  that  these 
citations  and  commentaries  have  reference  to  a  single  work 
put  together  by  Julian  the  Chaldean  in  the  period  of  the 
Antonines.  This  "mass  of  oriental  superstitions,  a  medley  of 
magic,  theurgy,  and  delirious  metaphysics,"  ^  was  reverenced 
by  the  Neo-Platonists  of  the  following  centuries  as  a  sacred 
authority  equal  to  the  Timaeus  of  Plato.  Our  next  chapter 
will  therefore  deal  with  the  writings  of  the  Neo-Platonists 
upon  whom  this  spurious  mystic  literature  had  so  much 
influence. 

*  Edited   by   Kroll,   De   oraculis  Sacra,  V,  2,  pp.  192-95,   Up6k\ov  bt 

Chaldaicis,    in    Breslaii    Philolog.  rrjs  XaXdaiKijs  (l)i\oao4>Lai.  Many  quo- 

Abhandl.,  VII  (1894),  1-76.    Cory,  tations  of  oracles  from  Porphyry's 

Ancient  Fragments,  London,  1832.  De  philosophia  ex  oraculis  hausta 

'  L.  A.  Gray  in  A.  V.  W.  Jack-  are  made  by  Eusebius,  Praeparatio 

son,  Zoroaster,  1901,  pp.  259-60.  evangclica,  in  PG,  XXI. 

'  G.    Wolff,    Porphyrii    de    phi-  '  Bouche-Leclercq,     L'Astrologie 

losophia    ex    oraculis    hauriendis,  grecque,  p.  599. 
Berlin,      1886.      Pitra,      Analecta 


CHAPTER  XI 

NEO-PLATONISM    AND    ITS    RELATIONS    TO    ASTROLOGY    AND 

THEURGY 


Neo- 

Platonism 
and  the 
occult. 


Neo-Platonism  and  the  occult — Plotinus  on  magic — The  life  of  rea- 
son is  alone  free  from  magic — Plotinus  unharmed  by  magic — Invoking 
the  demon  of  Plotinus — Rite  of  strangling  birds — Plotinus  and  astrology 
—The  stars  as  signs — The  divine  star-souls — How  do  the  stars  cause 
and  signify? — Other  causes  and  signs  than  the  stars — Stars  not  the 
cause  of  evil — Against  the  astrology  of  the  Gnostics — Fate  and  free- 
will— Summary  of  the  attitude  of  Plotinus  to  astrology — Porphyry's 
Letter  to  Anebo — Its  main  argument — Questions  concerning  divine 
natures — Orders  of  spiritual  beings — Nature  of  demons — The  art  of 
theurgy — Invocations  and  the  power  of  words — Magic  a  human  art : 
theurgy  divine — Magic's  abuse  of  nature's  forces — Its  evil  character — 
Its  deceit  and  unreality — Porphyry  on  modes  of  divination — lamblichus 
on  divination — Are  the  stars  gods? — Is  there  an  art  of  astrology? — 
Porphyry  and  astrology — Astrological  images — Number  mysticism — 
Porphyry  as  reported  by  Eusebius — The  emperor  Julian  on  theurgy 
and  astrology — Julian  and  divination — Scientific  divination  according  to 
Ammianus  Marcellinus — Proclus  on  theurgy — Neo-Platonic  account  of 
magic  borrowed  by  Christians — Neo-Platonists  and   alchemy. 

That  the  Neo-Platonists  were  much  given  to  the  occult  has 
been  a  common  impression  among-  those  who  have  written 
upon  the  period  of  the  decline  of  the  Roman  Empire,  of  the 
end  of  paganism,  and  the  passing  of  classical  philosophy. 
This  is  perhaps  in  some  measure  the  result  of  Christian  view- 
point and  hostility;  probably  the  Christians  of  the  period 
would  seem  equally  superstitious  to  a  modern  Neo-Platonist. 
If  the  lives  of  the  philosophers  by  Eunapius  sound  like  fairy 
tales, ^  what  do  the  lives  of  the  saints  of  the  same  period 
sound  like?     If  the  Neo-Platonists  were  like  our  mediums, 


*  Paul  Allard,  La  transforma- 
tion dii  Paganismc  romain  an  IJ^e 
siccle,  pp.  113-33,  in  Compte 
Rendu     du     Congrcs    Scicnlifique 


International      dcs       Catholiqucs. 
Detixicme    Section,    Sciences    re 
ligieuses.    Paris,  1891. 


298 


CHAP.  XI  NEO-PLATONISM  299 

what  were  the  Christian  exorcists  like?    But  let  us  turn  to 

the  writings  of  the  leading  Neo-Platonists  themselves,  the 

only  accurate  mirror  of  their  views. 

Plotinus/  who  lived  from  about  204  to  270  A.  D.  and   Plotinus 

on  magic, 
is  generally  regarded  as  the  founder  of  Neo-Platonism,  was 

apparently  less  given  to  occult  sciences  than  some  of  his 
successors.^  One  of  his  charges  against  the  Gnostics  ^  is 
that  they  believe  that  they  can  move  the  higher  and  incor- 
poreal powers  by  writing  incantations  and  by  spoken  words 
and  various  other  vocal  utterances,  all  which  he  censures  as 
mere  magic  and  sorcery.  He  also  attacks  their  belief  that 
diseases  are  demons  and  can  be  expelled  by  words.  This 
wins  them  a  following  among  the  crowd  who  are  wont  to 
marvel  at  the  powers  of  magicians,  but  Plotinus  insists  that 
diseases  are  due  to  natural  causes.*  Even  he,  however,  ac- 
cepted incantations  and  the  charms  of  sorcerers  and 
magicians  as  valid,  and  accounted  for  their  potency  by  the 
sympathy  or  love  and  hatred  which  he  said  existed  between 
different  objects  in  nature,  which  operates  even  at  a  dis- 

^  Plotini  opera  o»inia,  Forphyrii  spect.     A  noteworthy  recent  pub- 

libcr  de  znta  Plotini,  cum  Marsilii  lication  is  W.  R.  Inge,  Tlie  Philos- 

Ficini     commentariis   .   .   .   ed   D.  ophy  of  Plotinus,  1918,  2  vols. 

Wyttenbach,  G.  H.  Moser,  and  F.  "  H.  F.  Muller,  Plotinische  Stu- 

Creuzer,    Oxford,     1835,    3    vols.  dicn  II,  in  Hermes,  XLIX,  70-89, 

Page    references    in    my   citations  argues     that    the     philosophy     of 

are  to  this  edition,  but  I  have  also  Plotinus    was    genuinely    Hellenic 

employed:     Plotini  Enneadcs,   ed.  and  free   from   oriental   influence, 

R.   Volkmann,   Leipzig,    1883;   Se-  that    all    theurgy    was    hateful    to 

lect  Works  of  Plotinus  translated  him,  and  that   he  opposed   Gnos- 

from  the  Greek  with  an  Introduc-  ticism      and      astrology.      Miiller 

tion   containing   the    substance    of  seems  to  me  to  overstate  his  case 

Porphyry's   Life    of   Plotinus,    by  and  to  be  too  ready  to  exculpate 

Thomas  Taylor,  new  edition  with  Plotinus,   or  perhaps   rather   Hel- 

preface  and  bibliography  by  G.  R.  lenism,    from   concurrence   in   the 

S.    Mead,    London,    1909;    K.    S.  superstition  of  the  time. 

Guthrie,  The  Philosophy  of  Ploti-  ^  For  Gnosticism  see  Chapter  15. 

mis,  Philadelphia,  1896,  and  Ploti-  *'Ennead,  II,  9,  14.    IWwTivovirpos 

nos,     Complete    Works.    4    vols.,  tov%   Tvucttikovs,    ed.    G.    A.    Heigl, 

1918,  English  Translation.    Where  1832;  and  Plotini  De  Virtutibus  ct 

my  citations  give  the  number  of  Advcrsus  Gnosticos  libellos,  ed.  A. 

the    chapter    in    addition    to    the  Kirchhoff,  1847 ;  are  simply  extracts 

Ennead    and    Book,    these    agree  from   the   Enncads.     See   also  C. 

\vith  Volkmann's  text  and  Guth-  Schmidt,    Plotin's    Stellung    cum 

rie's  translation,— which,  however,  Gnosticismus   u.   kirchl.   Christeti'- 

are  not  quite  identical  in  this  re-  turn,  1900;  in  TU,  X,  90  pp. 


300 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


The  life 
of  reason 
is  alone 
free  from 
magic. 


Plotinus 
unharmed 
by  magic. 


tance,  and  which  is  an  expression  of  one  world-soul  ani- 
mating the  universe,^ 

Plotinus  held  further,  however,  that  only  the  physical 
and  irrational  side  of  man's  nature  was  affected  by  drugs 
and  sorcery,  just  as  "even  demons  are  not  impassive  in  their 
irrational  part,"  ^  and  so  are  to  some  extent  subject  to 
magic.  But  the  rational  soul  may  free  itself  from  all  influ- 
ence of  magic.^  Moreover,  remorselessly  adds  the  clear- 
headed Plotinus  with  a  burst  of  insight  that  may  well  be 
attributed  to  Hellenic  genius,  he  who  yields  to  the  charms  of 
love  and  family  affection  or  seeks  political  power  or  aught 
else  than  Truth  and  true  beauty,  or  even  he  who  searches 
for  beauty  in  inferior  things ;  he  who  is  deceived  by  appear- 
ances, he  who  follows  irrational  inclinations,  is  as  truly 
bewitched  as  if  he  were  the  victim  of  magic  and  goetia  so- 
called.  The  life  of  reason  is  alone  free  from  magic.'* 
Whereat  one  is  tempted  to  paraphrase  a  remark  of  Aelian  ^ 
and  exclaim,  "What  do  you  think  of  that  definition  of 
magic,  my  dear  anthropologists  and  sociologists  and  modern 
students  of  folk-lore?" 

This  immunity  of  the  true  philosopher  and  sincere  fol- 
lower of  truth  from  magic  received  illustration,  according 
to  Porphyr}',®  in  the  case  of  Plotinus  himself,  who  suffered 
no  harm  from  the  magic  arts  which  his  enemy,  Alexandrinus 
Olympius,  directed  against  him.  Instead  the  baleful  de- 
fluxions  from  the  stars  which  Olympius  had  tried  to  draw 
down  upon  Plotinus  were  turned  upon  himself.  Porphyry 
also  states  '^  that  Plotinus  was  aware  at  the  time  of  the 
"sidereal  enchantments"  of  Olympius  against  him.  Inci- 
dentally the  episode  provides  one  more  proof  of  the  essential 
unity  of  astrology  and  magic. 


^Ennead,  IV,  4,  40  (11,  805  or 
434).  Tas  dk  yoTjreLas  wws',  v  "rfj 
avuiraOilq.,  Kal  tw  ■Ke4>VKivai  avn4>uvlau 
elvai  ofjLolwv  KalkvavrLujatv  avofiolo^v,  Kal 
rfj  Twv  bvvay.c(j3v  tuv  toXXoij'  troiKiXiif. 
els  if  ^ct)oi>  awTeXovuTwv.  Ibid.  42  (II, 
808  or  436)  .  .  .KalTlxvoLisKailaTpiiv 
Kal  kvaoLduv  aWo  ctXXco  rjuayKaadr]  ira- 
paax^'i-v  TL  TTjs  bvvkixeoi's  ttis  avrov. 
Ennead,   IV,  9    (II,  891   or  479). 


el  dk  Kal  kTTuioal  Kal  oXwj  fiayelaL  ffvvd- 
yovcn  Kal  avixiradtls  TrSppudti'  iroiov(Ti, 
wavTOi^  Toi  hta  i/'i'X^J  nias. 

^  Enncad,  IV,  4  (II,  810  or  437). 

'^Ennead,  IV,  4,  43-44. 

*  Ennead,  IV,  4,  44. 

"  See  Chapter  XII,  pp.  323-4. 

*  Vita   Plotini,  cap.    10. 
'  Vita,  cap.   10, 


XI  NEO-PLATONISM  301 

Plotinus,    indeed,    was    regarded    by    his    admirers    as   Invoking 

the 
divinely   inspired,    as   another   incident    from   the   Life  by   demon  of 

Porphyry  will  illustrate.^   An  Egyptian  priest  had  little  diffi-   Plotinus. 

culty    in    persuading    Plotinus,    who    although    of    Roman 

parentage  had  been  born  in  Egypt,  to  allow  him  to  try  to 

invoke  his  familiar  demon.     Plotinus  was  then  teaching  in 

Rome  where  he  resided  for  twenty-six  years,  and  the  temple 

of  Isis  was  the  only  pure  place  in  the  city  which  the  priest 

could  find  for  the  ceremony.    When  the  invocation  had  been 

duly  performed,  there  appeared  not  a  mere  demon  but  a 

god.     The  apparition  was  not  long  enduring,  however,  nor 

would  the  priest  permit  them  to  question  it,  on  the  ground 

that  one  of  the  friends  of  Plotinus  present  had  marred  the 

success  of  the  operation.     This  man  had  feared  he  might 

suffer   some   injury  when   the   demon   appeared   and   as   a 

counter-charm  had  brought  some  birds  which  he  held  in  his 

hands,  apparently  by  the  necks,  for  at  the  critical  moment 

when  the  apparition  appeared  he  suffocated  them,  whether 

from  fright  or  from  envy  of  Plotinus  Porphyry  declares 

himself  unable  to  state. 

This  practice  of  grasping  birds  by  the  necks  in  both  The  rite  of 

hands  is  shown  by  a  number  of  works  of  art  to  have  been  a  birds. 

custom  of  great  antiquity.     We  may  see  a  winged  Gorgon 

strangling  a  goose  in  either  hand  upon  a  plate  of  the  seventh 

century  B.C.  from  Rhodes  now  in  the  British  Museum.^    A 

gold  pendant  of  the  ninth  century  B.C.  from  Aegina,  now 

also  in  the  British  Museum,  consists  of  a  figure  holding  a 

water-bird  by  the  neck  in  either  hand,  while  from  its  thighs 

pairs  of  serpents  issue  on  whose  folds  the  birds  stand  with 

their  bills  touching  the  fangs  of  the  snakes.^  There  also  is  a 

figure  of  a  winged  goddess  grasping  two  water-birds  by  the 

necks  upon  an  ivory  fibula  excavated  at  Sparta.^ 

*  Cap.   10.  such  as  a   figure  holding  up  two 

^  A748.  water-birds,     in     immediate     con- 

'  Shown      in      the      article      on  nexion  with  IMycenaean  gold  pat- 

"Jewelry"  in  the  eleventh  edition  terns."     See   further  A.  J.   Evans 

of    the    Encyclopedia    Britannica,  in    Journal    of    Hellenic    Studies, 

Plate    I,    Figure    50.     The   article  1893,  p.  197. 

says  of  the  pendant,  "Here  we  find  *].   E.  Harrison,  Themis,  Cam- 

the  themes  of  archaic  Greek  art,  bridge,  1912.  p.  114,  Fig.  20. 


302 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Plotinus 

and 

astrology. 


The  stars 
as  signs. 


Porphyry  also  tells  us  in  the  Life  that  Plotinus  devoted 
considerable  attention  to  the  stars  and  refuted  in  his  writ- 
ings the  unwarrantable  claims  of  the  casters  of  horoscopes.^ 
Such  passages  are  found  in  the  treatises  on  fate  and  on  the 
soul,  while  one  of  his  treatises  is  devoted  entirely  to  the 
question,  "Whether  the  stars  effect  anything?"  ^  This  was 
one  of  four  treatises  which  Plotinus  a  little  before  his  death 
sent  to  Porphyry,  and  which  are  regarded  as  rather  inferior 
to  those  composed  by  him  when  in  the  prime  of  life.  In  the 
next  century  the  astrologer,  Julius  Firmicus  Maternus,  re- 
gards Plotinus  as  an  enemy  of  astrology  and  represents  him 
as  dying  a  horrible  and  loathsome  death  from  gangrene.^ 

As  a  matter  of  fact  the  criticisms  made  by  Plotinus 
were  not  necessarily  destructive  to  the  art  of  astrology,  but 
rather  suggested  a  series  of  amendments  by  which  it  might 
be  made  more  compatible  with  a  Platonic  view  of  the  uni- 
verse, deity,  and  human  soul.  These  amendments  also 
tended  to  meet  Christian  objections  to  the  art.  His  criti- 
cisms were  not  new;  Philo  Judaeus  had  made  similar  ones 
over  two  centuries  before.*  But  the  great  influence  of 
Plotinus  gave  added  emphasis  to  these  criticisms.  For  in- 
stance, the  point  made  by  him  several  times  that  the  motion 
of  the  stars  "does  not  cause  everything  but  signifies  the 
future  concerning  each"  ^  man  and  thing,  is  noted  by 
Macrobius  both  in  the  Saturnalia  ^  and  the  Dreamt  of 
Scipio;  "^  while  in  the  twelfth  century  John  of  Salisbury, 
arguing  against  astrology,  fears  that  its  devotees  will  take 
refuge  in  the  authority  of  Plotinus  and  say  that  they  detract 


^  Vita,  cap.  15.  It  will  be  noted 
that  like  some  of  the  church 
fathers  Plotinus  attacked  geneth- 
lialogy  rather  than  astrology.  Upoa- 
elx^  8i  ToZs  fj.ev  ivepl  Tcbv  acrrepajv  ko- 
vdaiv  ov  Trdfu  Tt  /laOrjuaTiKcbs,  rotj  8e 
ruv  yepeOXidXoycov  airoTtkeaTiKols  a.Kpv- 
pkarepop.  Kal4>o}pa(Tas  tvs  kwayyeKLas 
r6  kvixtyyvov  eXeyx^tf  iroWaxov  Kal 
(tuv)  kv  rots  avyyp&fxfjiaaiu  ovk  ioKPrjae. 

'  Ennead  II,  3,  Ilepi  tov  el  iroul  tA, 
tarpa.  Porphyry  arranged  his 
master's  treatises  in  the  form  of 
six  enneads  of  nine  each  and  per- 


haps somewhat  revised  them  at  the 
same  time. 

^  Mathescos  libri  VIII,  ed. 
Kroll  et  Skutsch,  Lipsiae,  1897.  I, 
7,  14-22. 

*See  below,  pp.  353-4- 

^  Ennead  II,  3  (p.  242),  "On  v 
T03V  SlCtpuiv  <t)opa  (TrjfjLalvii  irepl 
tKaarov  to.  ka6p.eva  AXX'  ohK  avrri  ir&vTa 
iroiei,  ws  Tois  ttoXXoIj  5o|(if«Tai,  cKpTjrai 
fikv  irohrfpov  tv  aWois.  See  also  En- 
nead  III,  i,  and  IV,  3-4. 

•I,  18. 

^Cao.   19. 


XI  NEO-PLATONISM  303 

nothing  from  the  Creator's  power,  since  He  established  once 
for  all  an  unalterable  natural  law  and  disposed  all  future 
events  as  He  foresaw  them.  Thus  the  stars  are  merely  His 
instruments.^ 

But  let  us  see  what  Plotinus  says  himself  rather  than  The  divine 
what  others  took  to  be  his  meaning.  Like  Plato,  who  re-  ^^^'■■^°"  s- 
garded  the  stars  as  happy,  divine,  and  eternal  animals,  Plo- 
tinus not  only  believes  that  the  stars  have  souls  but  that 
their  intellectual  processes  are  far  above  the  frailties  of  the 
human  mind  and  nearer  the  omniscience  of  the  world-soul. 
Memory,  for  example,  is  of  no  use  to  them,^  nor  do  they 
hear  the  prayers  which  men  address  to  them.^  Plotinus 
often  calls  them  gods.  They  are,  however,  parts  of  the  uni- 
verse, subordinate  to  the  world-soul,  and  they  cannot  alter 
the  fundamental  principles  of  the  universe,  nor  deprive  other 
beings  of  their  individuality,  although  they  are  able  to  make 
other  beings  better  or  worse.* 

In  his  discussion  of  problems  concerning  the  soul  Plo-  How  do 

the  st3.rs 

tinus  says  that  "it  is  abundantly  evident  .  .  .  that  the  mo-  cause  and 
tion  of  the  heavens  affects  things  on  earth  and  not  only  in  signify? 
bodies  but  also  the  dispositions  of  the  soul,"  ^  and  that  each 
part  of  the  heavens  affects  terrestrial  and  inferior  objects. 
He  does  not,  however,  think  that  all  this  influence  can  be 
accounted  for  "exclusively  by  heat  or  cold," — perhaps  a  dig 
at  Ptolemy's  Tetrahihlos.^  He  also  objects  to  ascribing  the 
crimes  of  men  to  the  will  of  the  stars  or  every  human  act 

^  Polycraticus,  II,  19,  (ed.  C.  C.  agreed     that     they    have     senses, 

I.  Webb,  1909,  I,  112).    Mr.  Webb  namely,     sight    and    hearing,"    is 

(I,    xxviii)    holds    that    John    of  quite    misleading,    as    caps.    40-42 

Salisbury  "certainly  did  not  have  make  evident. 

Plotinus,"  and  derived  some  pas-  *  Ennead  II,  iii,  6  and  13   (249- 

sages     from    his    works    through  50). 

Macrobius  and  Augustine;  but  he  ^  Ennead  IV,   iv,   31.     on  nev  ovv 

is  unable  to   state  in  what  inter-  17  <f>opa.  voitl  .  .  .  a.vaiJi^i<T0-nT-nTiJi%  nlv 

mediate    source    John    could    have  rd  kirLyeta  ov  fxbvov  toIs  aco/^acnv  dXXd 

found   the   passage   now   in   ques-  /cat  rats  r^s  ^vxvs  biaOkaeoL,  Kal  tC:v 

tion.     It  does  not  seem  to  reflect  ntpdv  eKaarov  eis  to.  kTrlyua  Kal  6Xwj 

Plotinus'  doctrine  very  accurately.  rd  xdrw  woiel,  iroWaxv  8rj\ov. 

'  Eiuicad  IV,  iv,  6  and  8.  ^Idcm.     Guthrie  heads  the  pas- 

*  Ibid..  30.    Guthrie's  translation,  sage,     "Absurdity     of     Ptolemean 

"We  have  shown  that  memory  is  Astrology."     See  also  Ennead,  II, 

useless    to    the    stars:    we    have  iii,  1-5. 


304  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

to  a  sidereal  decision,^  and  to  speaking  of  friendships  and 
enmities  as  existing  between  the  planets  according  as  they 
are  in  this  or  that  aspect  towards  one  another.^  If  then  the 
admittedly  vast  influence  of  the  stars  cannot  be  satisfactorily 
accounted  for  either  as  material  effects  caused  by  them  as 
bodies  or  as  voluntary  action  taken  by  them,  how  is  it  to  be 
explained  ?  Plotinus  accounts  for  it  by  the  relation  of  sym- 
pathy which  exists  between  all  parts  of  the  universe,  that 
single  living  animal,  and  by  the  fact  that  the  universe  ex- 
presses itself  in  the  figures  formed  by  the  movements  of  the 
celestial  bodies,  which  "exert  what  influence  they  do  exert 
on  things  here  below  through  contemplation  of  the  intelli- 
gible world."  ^  These  figures,  or  constellations  in  the  astro- 
logical sense,  have  other  powers  than  those  of  the  bodies 
which  participate  in  them,  just  as  many  plants  and  stones 
*'among  us"  have  marvelous  occult  powers  for  which  heat 
and  cold  will  not  account.^  They  both  exert  influence  effec- 
tively and  are  signs  of  the  future  through  their  relation  to 
the  universal  whole.  In  many  things  they  are  both  causes 
and  signs,  in  others  they  are  signs  only.^ 
Other  For  Plotinus,  however,  the  universe  is  not  a  mechanical 

C3.11SCS   3.rid 

signs  than  ^^^  where  but  one  force  prevails,  namely,  that  produced  by 
the  stars,  qj.  represented  by  the  constellations.  The  universe  is  full  of 
variety  with  countless  different  powers,  and  the  whole  would 
not  be  a  living  animal  unless  each  living  thing  in  it  lived 
its  own  life,  and  unless  life  were  latent  even  in  inanimate 
objects.  It  is  true  that  some  powers  are  more  effective 
than  others,  and  that  those  of  the  sky  are  more  so  than 
those  of  earth,  and  that  many  things  lie  under  their  power. 
Nevertheless  Plotinus  sees  in  the  reproduction  of  life  and 
species  in  the  universe  a  force  independent  of  the  stars.     In 

^  Ennead  II,  iii,  6.  dXXA  yevofieva    iroi.6Tr)ai    Sia<}>6pois  Kal 

^  Ennead  II,  iii,  4.  \6yoLstiboTroLriBkvTaKai4>^(r€(j}s  dwaixtws 

*  Guthrie's    translation,    Ennead  neraXaliovTa,  olov  Kal  XLOcov  4>v<rtLs  Kal 

IV,  iv,  35.      ti  df)  dpq.  TL  6  i]\ios  Kal  to.  ^orapcJiv  kfepyeLaidavfiaaTaTroWaTrapt- 

&\\a   acrrpa  ets  to.  rfiSe,    xpi)   vonl^ew  x'^^'''^'- 

aiiTop  fj,h  avu  (iXkirovra  tlvai.  ^  Ennead  IV,  iv,  34.     Kal  Trotvaeis 

Idem.     Kal    kv  Tols   Trap'  77^111'   eicri  Kal    arjp.aaia's    iv    iroWols     AXXaxoO   5i 

iroXXat,  &s  ob  dtpixa  rj  xj/vxpo.  irapkxtTaL,  ar]ixaaias  iiovov. 


XI  NEO-PLATONISM  305 

the  generation  of  any  animal,  for  example,  the  stars  con- 
tribute something,  but  the  species  must  follow  that  of  its 
forebears.^  And  after  they  have  been  produced  or  begot- 
ten, terrestrial  beings  add  something  of  their  own.  Nor  are 
the  stars  the  sole  signs  of  the  future.  Plotinus  holds  that 
"all  things  are  full  of  signs,"  and  that  the  sage  can  not  mere- 
ly predict  from  stars  or  birds,  but  infer  one  thing  from  an- 
other by  virtue  of  the  harmony  and  sympathy  existing  be- 
tween all  parts  of  the  universe.^ 

Nor  can  the  gods  or  stars  be  said  to  cause  evil  on  earth.  Stars  not 
since  their  influence  is  affected  by  other  forces  which  mingle  of  evil, 
with  it.  Like  the  earlier  Jewish  Platonist,  Philo,  Plotinus 
denies  that  the  planets  are  the  cause  of  evil  or  change  their 
own  natures  from  good  to  evil  as  they  enter  new  signs  of  the 
zodiac  or  take  up  different  positions  in  relation  to  one  an- 
other. He  argues  that  they  are  not  changeable  beings,  that 
they  would  not  willingly  injure  men,  or,  if  it  is  contended 
that  they  are  mere  bodies  and  have  no  wills,  he  replies  that 
then  they  can  produce  only  corporeal  effects.  He  then  solves 
the  problem  of  evil  in  the  usual  manner  by  ascribing  it  to 
matter,  in  which  reason  and  the  celestial  force  are  received 
unevenly,  as  light  is  broken  and  refracted  in  passing  through 
water.^ 

Plotinus  repeats  much  the  same  line  of  argument  in  his  Against 
book  against  the  Gnostics,  where  he  protests  against  "the  a^^rology 
tragedy  of  terrors  which  they  think  exists  in  the  spheres  of  of  the 
the  universe,"  *  and  the  tyranny  they  ascribe  to  the  heavenly 
bodies.     His  belief  is  that  the  celestial  spheres  are  in  per- 
fect harmony  both  with  the  universe  as  a  whole  and  with  our 
globe,  completing  the  whole  and  constituting  a  great  part  of 
it,  supplying  beauty  and  order.    And  often  they  are  to  be  re- 
garded as  signs  rather  than  causes  of  the  future.     Their 
natures  are  constant,  but  the  sequence  of  events  may  be 
varied  by  chance  circumstances,  such  as  different  hours  of 

^  Ennead  II,  iii  (p.  256).  *  Enncad,  II,  ix,  13.  rrisTpaywblas 

Ibid.   (pp.  250-1).  Toiv  <f>oi3€pu:v,    COS  oiovTai,  a>  rals    rod 

"Ibid.,   II,   iii    (pp.   243-6,  254-5,       Koauov  ff<t>aiftai.s. 
263-5). 


3o6 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Fate  and 
free-will. 


Summary 
of  the  atti- 
tude of 
Plotinus  to 
astrology. 


nativities,  place  of  residence,  and  the  dispositions  of  indi- 
vidual souls.  Amid  all  this  diversity  one  must  also  expect 
both  good  and  evil,  but  not  on  that  account  call  nature  or 
the  stars  either  evil  themselves  or  the  cause  of  evil. 

As  the  allusion  just  made  in  the  preceding  paragraph  to 
"the  dispositions  of  individual  souls"  shows,  Plotinus  made 
a  distinction  between  the  extent  of  the  control  exercised  by 
the  stars  over  inanimate,  animate,  and  rational  beings.  The 
stars  signify  all  things  in  the  sensible  world  but  the  soul  is 
free  unless  it  slips  and  is  stained  by  the  body  and  so  comes 
under  their  control.  Fate  or  the  force  of  the  stars  is  like 
a  wind  which  shakes  and  tosses  the  ship  of  the  body  in 
which  the  soul  makes  its  passage.  Man  as  a  part  of  the 
world  does  some  things  and  suffers  many  things  in  accord- 
ance with  destiny.  Some  men  become  slaves  to  this  world 
and  to  external  influences,  as  if  they  were  bewitched. 
Others  look  to  their  inner  souls  and  strive  to  free  themselves 
from  the  sensible  world  and  to  rise  above  demonic  nature 
and  all  fate  of  nativities  and  all  necessity  of  this  world,  and 
to  live  in  the  intelligible  world  above. ^ 

Thus  Plotinus  arrives  at  practically  what  was  to  be  the 
usual  Christian  position  in  the  middle  ages  regarding  the 
influence  of  the  stars,  maintaining  the  freedom  of  the  human 
will  and  yet  allowing  a  large  field  to  astrological  prediction. 
He  is  evidently  more  concerned  to  combat  the  notion  that 
the  stars  cause  evil  or  are  to  be  feared  as  evil  powers  than 
he  is  to  combat  the  belief  in  their  influence  and  significations. 
His  speaking  of  the  stars  both  as  signs  and  causes  in  a  way 
doubles  the  possibility  of  prediction  from  them.  If  he  at- 
tacked the  language  used  by  astrologers  of  the  planets,  and 
perhaps  to  a  certain  extent  the  technique  of  their  art,  he 
supported  astrology  by  reconciling  the  existence  of  evil  and 
of  human  freedom  with  a  great  influence  of  the  stars  and  by 
his  emphasis  upon  the  importance  of  the  figures  made  by  the 

^The   references   for  the   state-  III,  iv  (p.  521);  IV,  iv  (p.  813); 

ments    in    this    paragraph    are    in  II,  iii   (p.  260)  ;  III,  iv  (p.  520)  ; 

the    order    of    their    occurrence:  IV,  3  (p.  71 0  :  in  these  cases  the 

Enncad,   II,   iii    (pp.  257,   251-2)  ;  higher  page-numbering  is   used. 


XI  NEO-PLATONISM  307 

movements  of  the  heavenly  bodies  above  any  purely  physical 
effects  of  their  bodies  as  such.  Thus  he  reinforced  the  con- 
ception of  occult  virtue,  always  one  of  the  chief  pillars,  if 
not  the  chief  support,  of  occult  science  and  magic.  On  the 
other  hand,  men  were  not  likely  to  reform  a  language  and 
technique  sanctioned  by  as  great  an  astronomer  as  Ptolemy 
merely  because  a  Neo-Platonist  questioned  its  propriety. 

Although  Plotinus  denied  that  diseases  were  due  to  de-  Porphyry's 
mons,  vve  once  heard  him  speak  of  "demonic  nature,"  and  J^H^^^  ^^ 
one  of  the  Enneads  discusses  Each  man's  own  demon.  Here, 
however,  the  discussion  is  limited  to  the  power  presiding  in 
each  human  soul,  and  nothing  is  said  of  magic.  For  the  con- 
nection of  demons  with  magic  and  for  the  art  of  theurgy  we 
must  turn  to  the  writings  of  Porphyry  and  lamblichus,  and 
especially  to  The  Letter  to  Aneho  of  Porphyry,  who  lived 
from  about  233  to  305,  and  the  reply  thereto  of  the  master 
Abammon,  a  work  which  is  otherwise  known  as  Liber  de 
mysteriis}  The  attribution  of  the  latter  work  to  lamblichus, 
who  died  about  330,  is  based  upon  an  anonymous  assertion 
prefixed  to  an  ancient  manuscript  of  Proclus  and  upon  the 
fact  that  Proclus  himself  quotes  a  passage  from  the  De  mys- 
teriis as  the  words  of  lamblichus.  This  attribution  has  been 
questioned,  but  if  not  by  lamblichus,  the  work  seems  to  be 
at  least  by  some  disciple  of  his  with  similar  views."  Other 
works  of  lamblichus  are  largely  philosophical  and  mathe- 
matical; among  the  chief  works  of  Porphyry,  apart  from 
his  literary  work  in  connection  with  Plotinus,  were  his  com- 
mentaries on  Aristotle  and  fifteen  books  against  the  Chris- 
tians. 

The  Letter  to  Anebo  inquires  concerning  the  nature  of  Its  main 
the  gods,  the  demons,  and  the  stars;  asks  for  an  explana-  ^^§""^^t- 
tion  of  divination  and  astrology,  of  the  power  of  names  and 
incantations;  and  questions  the  employment  of  invocations 

^  Edited    Venice,   Aldine    Press,  lor's  English  translation,  London, 

1497  and  15 16;   Oxford,   1678;  by  1821. 

G.   Partliey,  Berlin,   1857.     In_  the  *  Carl     Rasche,     De     lamblicho 

following    quotations    from    it    I  libri   qui    inscribitur   de   mysteriis 

have   usually  adhered  to  T.  Ta}^-  auctore,  Aschendorff,   191 1,  82  pp. 


3o8 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Questions 
concerning 
divine 
natures. 


and  sacrifice.  Other  topics  brought  up  are  the  rule  of  spirits 
over  the  world  of  nature,  partitioned  out  among  them  for 
this  purpose ;  the  divine  inspiration  or  demoniacal  possession 
of  human  beings ;  and  the  occult  sympathy  between  different 
things  in  the  material  universe.  In  especial  the  art  of  the- 
urgy, a  word  said  to  be  used  now  for  the  first  time  by  Por- 
phyry,^ is  discussed.  It  may  be  roughly  defined  for  the 
moment  as  a  sort  of  pious  necromancy  or  magical  cult  of  the 
gods.  Porphyry  raises  various  objections  to  the  procedure 
and  logic  of  the  theurgists,  diviners,  enchanters,  and  astrolo- 
gers, which  lamblichus,  as  we  shall  henceforth  call  the  au- 
thor of  the  De  mysteriis  as  a  matter  of  convenience  if  not 
of  certainty,  endeavors  to  answer,  and  to  justify  the  art  of 
theurgy. 

We  may  first  note  the  theory  of  demons  which  is  elicited 
from  lamblichus  in  response  to  Porphyry's  trenchant  and 
searching  questions.  The  latter,  declaring  that  ignorance  and 
disingenuousness  concerning  divine  natures  are  no  less  rep- 
rehensible than  impiety  and  impurity,  demands  a  scientific 
discussion  of  the  gods  as  a  holy  and  beneficial  act.  He  asks 
why,  if  the  divine  power  is  infinite,  indivisible,  and  incom- 
prehensible, different  places  and  different  parts  of  the  body 
are  allotted  to  different  gods.  Why,  if  the  gods  are  pure  in- 
tellects, they  are  represented  as  having  passions,  are  wor- 
shiped with  phallic  ritual,  and  are  tempted  with  invocations 
and  sacred  offerings?  Why  boastful  speech  and  fantastic 
action  are  taken  as  indications  of  the  divine  presence;  and 
why,  if  the  gods  dwell  in  the  heavens,  theurgists  invoke  only 
terrestrial  and  subterranean  deities?  How  superior  beings 
can  be  invoked  with  commands  by  their  inferiors,  why  the 
Sun  and  Moon  are  threatened,  why  the  man  must  be  just 
and  chaste  who  invokes  spirits  in  order  to  secure  unjust  ends 
or  gratify  lust,  and  why  the  worshiper  must  abstain  from 
animal  food  and  not  touch  a  corpse  when  sacrifices  to  the 
gods   consist   of  the  bodies   of  dead  victims?      Porphyry 

'  Bouche-Leclercq,  L'Astrologie  grecque  (1898),  p.  599,  citing  Kroll, 
De  oraculis  Chaldaicis. 


XI  NEO-PLATONISM  309 

wishes  further  an  explanation  of  the  various  genera  of  gods, 
visible  and  invisible,  corporeal  and  incorporeal,  beneficent 
and  malicious,  aquatic  and  aerial.  He  wants  to  know 
whether  the  stars  are  not  gods,  how  gods  differ  from  demons, 
and  what  the  distinction  is  between  souls  and  heroes. 

lamblichus  in  reply  states  that  as  heroes  are  elevated  Orders  of 
above  souls,  so  demons  are  inferior  and  subservient  to  the  belngg,^ 
gods  and  translate  the  infinite,  ineffable,  and  invisible  divine 
transcendent  goodness  into  terms  of  visible  forms,  energy, 
and  reason.^  He  further  distinguishes  "the  etherial,  empy- 
rean, and  celestial  gods,"  and  angels,  archangels,  and  ar- 
chons.^  As  for  corporeal,  visible,  aerial,  and  aquatic  gods, 
he  affirms  that  the  gods  have  no  bodies  and  no  particular 
allotments  of  space,  but  that  natural  objects  participate  in 
or  are  related  to  the  gods  etherially  or  aerially  or  aquatically, 
each  according  to  its  nature.^  "The  celestial  divinities,"  for 
example,  "are  not  comprehended  by  bodies  but  contain  bodies 
in  their  divine  lives  and  energies.  They  are  not  themselves 
converted  to  body,  but  they  have  a  body  which  is  converted 
to  its  divine  cause,  and  that  body  does  not  impede  their 
intellectual  and  incorporeal  perfection."  ^  lamblichus  denies 
that  there  are  any  maleficent  gods,  saying  that  "it  is  much 
better  to  acknowledge  our  inability  to  explain  the  occurrence 
of  evil  than  to  admit  anything  impossible  and  false  concern- 
ings  the  gods."  ^  But  he  admits  the  existence  of  both  good 
and  evil  demons  and  makes  of  the  latter  a  convenient  scape- 
goat upon  whom  to  saddle  any  inconsistencies  or  impurities 
in  religious  rites  and  magical  ceremony. 

lamblichus  does  not,  however,  hold  the  view  of  Apuleius  Nature  of 
that  demons  are  subject  to  passions.     They  are  impassive     ^"^°"s. 
and  incapable  of  suffering.^   He  scorns  the  notion  that  even 
the  worst  demons  can  be  allured  by  the  vapors  of  animal 
sacrifice  or  that  petty  mortals  can  supply  such  beings  with 
anything;'^  it  is  rather  in  the  consumption  of  foul  matter 

*  De  mysieriis,  I,  5.  °  IV,  6. 

*VIII,  2.  n,  10. 

'I,  9.  ''V,  10-12. 
*I,  17  (Taylor's  translation). 


310  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

by  pure  fire  in  the  act  of  sacrifice  that  they  take  delight. 
Demons  are  not,  however,  like  the  gods  entirely  separated 
from  bodies.  The  world  is  divided  up  into  prefectures 
among  them  and  they  are  more  or  less  inseparable  from  and 
identified  with  the  natural  objects  which  they  govern.^  Thus 
they  may  serve  to  enmesh  the  soul  in  the  bonds  of  matter 
and  of  fate,  and  to  afflict  the  body  with  disease.^  Also  the 
evil  demons  "are  surrounded  by  certain  noxious,  blood- 
devouring,  and  fierce  wild  beasts,"  probably  of  the  type  of 
vampires  and  empousas.^  lamblichus  further  holds  that  there 
is  a  class  of  demons  who  are  without  judgment  and  reason, 
each  of  whom  has  some  one  function  to  perform  and  is  not 
adapted  to  do  anything  else,*  Such  demons  or  forces  in 
nature  men  may  well  address  as  superiors  in  invoking  them, 
since  they  are  superior  to  men  in  their  one  special  function ; 
but  when  they  have  once  been  invoked,  man  as  a  rational 
being  may  also  well  issue  commands  to  them  as  his  irra- 
tional inferiors.^ 

The  art  of         lamblichus  also  undertakes  the  defense  of  theurgy  and 
theurgy.  . 

carefully  distinguishes  it  from  magic,  as  we  shall  soon  see. 

It  is  also  different  from  science,  since  it  does  not  merely  em- 
ploy the  physical  forces  of  the  natural  universe,^  and  from 
philosophy,  since  its  ineffable  works  are  beyond  the  reach 
of  mere  intelligence,  and  those  who  merely  philosophize 
theoretically  cannot  hope  for  a  theurgic  union  or  communion 
with  the  gods."^  Even  theurgists  cannot  as  a  rule  endure  the 
light  of  spiritual  beings  higher  than  heroes,  demons,  and 
angels,*  and  it  is  an  exceedingly  rare  occurrence  for  one  of 
them  to  be  united  with  the  supramundane  gods.^  This 
theurgy,  or  "the  art  of  divine  works,"  operates  by  means 
of  "arcane  signatures"  and  "the  power  of  inexplicable  sym- 
bols." ^^  It  is  thus  that  lamblichus  explains  away  most  of 
the  details  in  sacred  rites  and  sacrifices  to  which  Porphyry 

'  I,  20.  '  IV,    10. 

MI,  6.  'II,  II. 

"11,7.  '11,3. 

MV,  I.  'V,  20. 

MV.  2.  "I,  9;  VI,  6;  II,  II. 


XI  NEO-PLATONISM  311 

had  objected  as  obscene  or  material  and  as  implying  that  the 
gods  themselves  were  passive  and  passionate.  They  are 
mystic  symbols,  "consecrated  from  eternity''  for  some  hid- 
den reason  "which  is  more  excellent  than  reason."  ^  Occult 
virtues  indeed!  We  have  already  heard  lamblichus  state 
that  natural  objects  participate  in  or  are  related  to  the  gods 
etherially  or  aerially  or  aquatically;  theurgists  therefore 
quite  properly  employ  in  their  art  certain  stones,  herbs,  aro- 
matics,  and  sacred  animals.^  By  employing  such  potent  sym- 
bols mere  man  takes  on  such  a  sacred  character  himself  that 
he  is  able  to  command  many  spiritual  powers.^ 

Invocations  and  prayers  are  also  much  used  in  theurgical  Invoca- 
operations.  But  such  invocations  do  not  draw  down  the  ^^e  power 
impassive  and  pure  gods  to  this  world;  rather  they  purify  °f  words, 
those  who  employ  them  from  their  passions  and  impurity 
and  exalt  them  to  union  with  the  pure  and  the  divine.* 
These  prayers  are  symbolic,  too.  They  do  not  appeal  to 
human  passions  or  reason,  "for  they  are  perfectly  unknown 
and  arcane  and  are  alone  known  to  the  God  whom  they  in- 
voke." ^  In  another  passage  ^  lamblichus  replies  to  Por- 
phyry's objection  that  such  prayers  are  often  composed  of 
meaningless  words  and  names  without  signification  by  de- 
claring— somewhat  inconsistently  with  his  previous  asser- 
tion that  these  invocations  are  "perfectly  unknown" — that 
some  of  the  names  "which  we  can  scientifically  analyze" 
comprehend  "the  whole  divine  essence,  power  and  order." 
Moreover,  if  translated  into  another  language,  they  do  not 
have  exactly  the  same  meaning,  and  even  if  they  do,  they 
no  longer  retain  the  same  power  as  in  the  original  tongue. 
We  shall  meet  a  similar  passage  concerning  the  power  of 
words  and  divine  names  in  the  church  father  Origen  who 
lived  earlier  in  the  third  century  than  Porphyry  and  lam- 
blichus.     lamblichus   concludes   that   "it   is   necessary  that 

'I,  II.  "I,  12. 

ay    2^  *I,  15;  III,  24  (Taylor's  trans- 

^'  ^^-  lation). 
"IV.  2.  "VII,  4. 


312 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Magic  a 

human 

art: 

theurgy 

divine. 


Magic's 
abuse  of 
nature's 
forces. 


ancient    prayers  .  .  .  should   be    preserved    invariably   the 
same."  ^ 

Neither  Porphyry  nor  lamblichus,  I  believe,  employs  the 
word,  "magic,"  but  they  both  often  allude  to  its  practitioners 
and  methods  by  such  expressions  as  "jugglers"  and  "enchant- 
ers" or  by  contrasting  what  is  done  "artificially"  or  by 
means  of  art  with  theurgical  operations.  In  the  last  case 
the  distinction  is  between  what  on  the  one  hand  is  regarded 
as  a  divine  mystery  or  revelation  and  what  on  the  other 
hand  is  looked  upon  as  a  mere  human  art  and  contrivance. 
And  "nothing  .  .  .  which  is  fashioned  by  human  art  is 
genuine  and  pure."  ^  Christian  writers  drew  a  like  distinc- 
tion between  prophecy  or  miracle  and  divination  or  magic. 
Sometimes,  however,  lamblichus  speaks  of  theurgy  itself 
as  an  art,  an  involuntary  admission  of  the  close  resemblance 
between  its  methods  and  those  of  magic.  We  are  also  told 
that  if  the  theurgist  makes  a  slip  in  his  procedure,  he  there- 
by reduces  it  to  the  level  of  magic.^ 

Another  distinction  is  that  theurgy  aims  at  communion 
with  the  gods  while  magic  has  to  do  rather  with  "the  physi- 
cal or  corporeal  powers  of  the  universe."  ^  Both  Porphyry 
and  lamblichus  believed  that  harmony,  sympathy,  and  mutual 
attraction  existed  between  the  various  objects  in  the  uni- 
verse, which  lamblichus  asserted  was  one  animal.^  Thus  it 
is  possible  for  man  to  draw  distant  things  to  himself  or  to 
unite  them  to,  or  separate  them  from,  one  another.^  But 
art  may  also  use  this  force  of  sympathy  between  objects  in 
an  extreme  and  unseemly  manner,  and  this  disorderly  forc- 
ing of  nature,  we  are  left  to  infer,  constitutes  an  essential 
feature  of  m.agic,  whose  procedure  is  not  truly  natural  or 
scientific. 

Magic  not  only  disorders  the  law  and  harmony,  and  makes 
a  perverse  and  contrary  use  of  natural  forces.  Its  practi- 
tioners are  also  represented  as  aiming  at  evil  ends  and  as 


VII,  5. 
'  III,  29. 
•II.  10. 


*IV,  10. 

'IV,    12. 

'IV,  3. 


XI  NEO-PLATONISM  313 

themselves  of  evil  character.^  They  may  try  by  their  illicit 
and  impure  procedure  to  have  intercourse  with  the  gods  or 
with  pure  spirits,  but  they  are  unable  to  accomplish  this.  All 
that  they  succeed  in  doing  is  to  secure  the  alliance  of  evil 
demons  by  associating  with  whom  they  become  more  de- 
praved than  ever.  Such  wicked  demons  may  pose  as  angels 
of  light  by  requiring  that  those  who  invoke  them  should 
be  just  or  chaste,  but  afterwards  they  show  their  true  colors 
by  assisting  in  crimes  and  the  gratification  of  lusts. ^  It  is 
they,  too,  who  assuming  the  guise  of  superior  spirits  are 
responsible  for  the  boastful  and  arrogant  utterances  of 
which  Porphyry  complained  in  persons  supposed  to  be  di- 
vinely inspired.^ 

Finally  magic  is  unstable  and  fantastic.  "The  imagina-  Its  deceit 
tions  artificially  produced  by  enchantment"  are  not  real  ob-  ^ijj.y_ 
jects.  Those  who  foretell  the  future  by  "standing  on  char- 
acters" are  no  theurgists,  but  employ  a  superficial,  false,  and 
deceptive  procedure  which  can  attract  only  evil  demons.* 
These  demons  are  themselves  deceitful  and  produce  "fic- 
titious images."  ^  Porphyry  in  the  Letter  to  Aneho  also  al- 
luded to  the  frauds  of  "jugglers."  Although  the  attitude 
both  of  Porphyry  and  lamblichus  is  thus  professedly  unfa- 
vorable to  the  magic  arts,  we  find  that  one  of  lamblichus's 
disciples,  named  Sopater,  was  executed  under  Constantine  on 
a  charge  of  having  charmed  the  winds.® 

How  is  divination  to  be  placed  in  reference  to  magic  and  Porphyry 
theurgy  ?     Porphyry  had  inquired  concerning  various  meth-  ""  divina- 
ods  of  divination:  in  sleep,  in  trances,  and  when  fully  con-  tion. 
scious;  in  ecstasy,  in  disease,  and  in  states  of  mental  aber- 
ration or  enchantment.     He  mentioned  divination  on  hear- 
ing drums  and  cymbals,  by  drinking  water  and  other  potions, 
by  inhaling  vapor ;  divination  in  darkness,  in  a  wall,  in  the 
open  air  or  in  the  sunlight;  by  observing  entrails  or  the 
flight  of  birds  or  the  motion  of  the  stars,  or  even  by  means 

'IV,  10;  III,  31.  'II,  10. 

^  IV,  7.  *  E.    S.    Bouchier,    Syria    as   a 

'  II,  10.  Roman    Province,    Oxford,    1916, 

*VI,    5;    III,    25;  III,    13.  p.  231. 


314  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

of  meal.  Yet  other  modes  of  determining  the  future  which 
he  hsts  are  by  characters,  images,  incantations,  and  invoca- 
tions, with  which  the  use  of  stones  and  herbs  is  often  com- 
bined. These  details  make  it  evident  how  impossible  it  is 
to  draw  any  dividing  line  between  the  methods  of  magic  and 
divination,  and  Porphyry  himself  states  that  those  who  in- 
voke the  gods  concerning  the  future  not  only  "have  about 
them  stones  and  herbs,"  but  are  able  to  bind  and  to  free 
from  bonds,  to  open  closed  doors,  and  to  change  men's  in- 
tentions. Among  the  virtues  of  parts  of  animals  mentioned 
in  his  treatise  upon  abstinence  from  animal  food  are  the 
powers  of  divination  which  may  be  obtained  by  eating  the 
heart  of  a  hawk  or  crow.-"- 
lamblichus  Porphyry  states  that  all  diviners  attribute  their  predic- 
tion.^^*^^'  tions  to  gods  or  demons,  but  that  he  wonders  if  foreknowl- 
edge may  not  be  a  power  of  the  human  soul  or  perhaps 
accountable  for  by  the  sympathy  which  exists  between  differ- 
ent parts  of  the  universe.  lamblichus  holds,  however,  that 
divination  is  neither  a  human  art  nor  the  work  of  nature 
but  of  divine  origin.^  He  perhaps  regards  it  as  little  more 
than  a  branch  of  theurgy.  He  distinguishes  between  human 
dreams  which  are  sometimes  true,  sometimes  false,  and 
dreams  and  visions  divinely  sent.^  If  one  is  able  to  predict 
the  future  by  drinking  water,  it  is  because  the  water  has  been 
divinely  illuminated.*  That  we  can  predict  when  the  mind 
is  diseased  and  disordered,  and  that  stupid  or  simple-minded 
men  are  often  better  able  to  prophesy  than  the  wise  and 
learned,  are  for  him  but  further  proofs  that  foreknowledge 
is  a  divine  gift  and  not  a  human  science,  while  divination 
by  such  means  as  rods,  pebbles,  grains  of  corn  and  wheat 
simply  excites  the  more  his  pious  admiration  at  the  great- 
ness of  divine  power.^  He  disapproves  of  divination  by 
standing  on  characters,^  but  sees  no  reason  why  divination 
in  darkness,  in  a  wall,  or  in  sunlight,  or  by  potions  and  in- 
cantations, may  not  be  divinely  directed.    He  will  not,  how- 

^De  absHnentia,  II,  48.  *III,  11. 

Mil,  I,  10.  "Ill,  24;  III,  17. 

•Ill,  2-3.  "Ill,  14. 


XI  NEO-PLATONISM  315 

ever,  connect  the  disordered  imaginations  excited  by  dis- 
ease with  divine  presentiments.^  From  true  divination  he 
also  separates  the  "natural  prescience"  of  certain  animals 
M^hose  acuteness  of  sense  or  occult  sympathy  with  other 
parts  and  forces  of  nature  enables  them  to  perceive  some  com- 
ing events  before  men  do.  Their  power  resembles  proph- 
ecy, "yet  falls  short  of  it  in  stability  and  truth."  ^  Augury 
is  an  art  whose  conjectures  have  great  probability,  but  they 
are  based  upon  divine  signs  or  portents  effected  in  nature 
by  the  agency  of  demons.^ 

The  stars  are  on  a  totally  different  plane  from  the  other  Are 
substances  employed  in  divination.  To  Porphyry's  ques-  lods?^^^ 
tion  whether  they  are  not  gods  lamblichus  is  not  content  to 
reply  that  the  celestial  divinities  comprehend  these  heav- 
enly bodies  and  that  the  bodies  in  no  way  impede  "their  in- 
tellectual and  incorporeal  perfection."  ^  He  must  needs  go 
on  to  argue  that  the  stars  themselves,  as  simple  indivisible 
bodies,  unchanging  in  quality  and  uniform  in  movement, 
closely  approach  to  "the  incorporeal  essence  of  the  gods." 
He  then  triumphantly  if  illogically  concludes,  "Thus  there- 
fore the  visible  celestials  are  all  of  them  gods  and  after  a 
certain  manner  incorporeal."  We  may  add  the  opinion  of 
Chaeremon  and  others,  noted  by  Porphyry,  that  the  only 
gods  were  the  physical  ones  of  the  Egyptians  and  the  planets, 
signs  of  the  zodiac,  decans,  and  horoscope;  all  religious 
myths  were  explained  by  Chaeremon  as  astrological  alle- 
gories. 

Porphyry  objected  that  those  who  thus  reduce  religion  is  there 
to  astrology  submit  everything  to  fate  and  leave  the  human  ^^^"^l  °^ ; 
soul  no  freedom,  and  furthermore  that  in  any  case  astrology 
is  an  unattainable  science.     lamblichus  defends  it  against 
these  objections,  insisting  that  the  universe  is  divided  under 
the  rule  of  planets,  signs,  and  decans ;  ^  that  the  Egyptians 

*III,   25.     Although,   as    stated  Mil,  26. 

above,    one    may    be    divinely    in-  '  III,  15. 

spired  while   diseased.     But  there  '  I,  17. 

is   no   causal    connection   between  "VIII,  4. 
the  two. 


3i6 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Porphyry 

and 

astrology. 


Astrologi- 
cal images. 


do  not  make  everything  physical  but  ascribe  two  souls  to 
man,  one  of  which  obeys  the  revolutions  of  the  stars,  while 
the  other  is  intellectual  and  free ;  ^  and  that  there  is  a  sys- 
tematic art  of  astrology  based  on  divine  revelation  and  the 
long  observations  of  the  Chaldeans,  although  like  any  other 
science  it  may  at  times  degenerate  and  become  contaminated 
by  error.^  lamblichus  further  regards  as  ridiculous  the  con- 
tention of  those  "who  ascribe  depravity  to  the  celestial  bodies 
because  their  participants  sometimes  produce  evil."  ^  In 
the  brief  separate  treatise,  De  fato,'^  he  again  holds  that  all 
things  are  bound  by  the  indissoluble  chain  of  necessity  which 
men  call  fate,  but  that  the  gods  can  loose  the  bonds  of  fate, 
and  that  the  human  mind,  too,  has  power  to  rise  above  na- 
ture, unite  with  the  gods,  and  enjoy  eternal  life. 

Whether  Porphyry  in  his  other  extant  works  evidences 
a  belief  in  astrology  or  not,  and  whether  he  wrote  an  Intro- 
duction to  the  Tetrabiblos  or  astrological  handbook  of  Ptol- 
emy, has  been  disputed.^  This  Introduction  ascribed  to 
Porphyry  was  much  cited  by  subsequent  astrologers  ®  and 
was  printed  in  1559  together  with  a  much  longer  anonymous 
commentary  on  the  Tetrabiblos  which  some  ascribe  to  Proc- 
lus."^ 

Towards  astrological  images  at  least.  Porphyry  shows 
himself  in  the  Letter  to  Anebo  more  favorable  than  lam- 
blichus, saying,  "Nor  are  the  artificers  of  efficacious  images 
to  be  despised,  for  they  observe  the  motion  of  celestial 
bodies."  lamblichus,  on  the  other  hand,  rather  grudgingly 
admits  that  "the  image-making  art  attracts  a  certain  very 
obscure  genesiurgic  portion  from  the  celestial  effluxions."  ^ 
He  seems  to  have  the  same  feeling  against  images  as  against 


'VIII,  6. 
'IX,  3-4. 
•I,  18. 

*  lamblichus.  In  Nicomachi 
Geraseni  arithmeticam  introduc- 
tionem  et  De  fato,  published  by 
Tennulius,  Deventer  and  Arnheim, 
1668. 

"Zeller,  Philos.  d.  Gr.,  Ill,  2,  2, 
p.    608.    cites    passages    to    show 


Porphyry's  leanings  towards  as- 
trology; but  F.  Boll,  Studien  ilber 
Claudius  Ptolemaeus,  1 15-17,  and 
Bouche-L  e  c  1  e  r  c  q  ,  L'Astrologie 
grccque,  601-602,  are  inclined  to 
the  opposite  view. 

"  CCAG,  passim. 

'  Ed.  Hieronymus  Wolf,  Basel, 
1559,  Greek  and  Latin. 

« III.  28. 


XI 


NEO-PLATONISM 


317 


characters,  perhaps  regarding  both  as  bordering  upon  idol- 
atry.^ 

Plotinus,  Porphyry,  and  lambHchus  were  all  given  to 
number  mysticism.  The  sixth  book  of  the  sixth  Ennead  is 
entirely  devoted  to  this  subject,  while  Porphyry  and  lam- 
blichus  both  wrote  Lives  of  Pythagoras  and  treatises  upon 
his  doctrine  of  number. 

Other  works  by  Porphyry  than  the  Letter  to  Anebo 
axe  cited  or  quoted  a  good  deal  by  Eusebius  in  Praeparatio 
evangeiica,  especially  his  Hept  r^s  e/c  \o'yloiv  4)Ckoao4)las ,  but 
the  extracts  are  made  for  Eusebius's  own  purposes,  which 
are  to  discredit  pagan  religion,  and  neither  express  Por- 
phyry's complete  thought  nor  probably  even  tend  to  prove 
his  original  point.  Besides  showing  that  Porphyry  was  in- 
consistent in  distinguishing  the  different  victims  to  be  sac- 
rificed to  terrestrial  and  subterranean,  aerial,  celestial,  and 
sea  gods  in  the  above-mentioned  work,  when  in  his  De  ab- 
stinentia  a  rebus  animatis  he  held  that  beings  who  delighted 
in  animal  sacrifice  were  no  gods  but  mere  demons,  Eusebius 
quotes  him  a  good  deal  to  show  that  the  pagan  gods  were 
nothing  but  demons,  that  they  themselves  might  be  called 
magicians  and  astrologers,  that  they  loved  characters,  and 
that  they  made  their  predictions  of  the  future  not  from  their 
own  foreknowledge  but  from  the  stars  by  the  art  of  as- 
trology, and  that  like  men  they  could  not  even  always  read 
the  decrees  of  the  stars  aright.  The  belief  is  also  men- 
tioned that  the  fate  foretold  from  the  stars  may  be  avoided 
by  resort  to  magic.^ 

The  Emperor  Julian  was  an  enthusiastic  follower  of  lam- 
blichus  whom  he  praises  ^  in  his  Hymn  to  the  Sovereign 
Sun  delivered  at  the  Saturnalia  of  361  A.  D.  He  also  de- 
scribes "the  blessed  theurgists"  as  able  to  comprehend  un- 
speakable mysteries  which  are  hidden  from  the  crowd, 
such  as  Julian  the  Chaldean  prophesied  concerning  the  god 


Number 
mysticism. 


Porphyry 
as  reported 
by  Euse- 
bius. 


The 

Emperor 

Julian  on 

theurgy 

and 

astrology. 


'  III,  29. 

*  Eusebius,  Praep.  evang.,  IV,  6- 
15i  23;  V,  6,  II,  14-15;  VI,  I,  4-5; 


etc.,  in  Migne,  PG,  XXI.  _ 

^  Loeb       Library       edition 
Julian's  works,  I,  398,  412,  433. 


of 


3i8  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

of  the  seven  rays.^  The  emperor  tells  us  that  from  his  youth 
he  was  regarded  as  over-curious  {irepLepyoTepov,  a  word 
which  almost  implies  the  practice  of  magic)  and  as  a  di- 
viner by  the  stars  {aaTpbuavTiv).  His  Hymn  to  the  Sun  con- 
tains a  good  deal  of  astrological  detail,  speaks  of  the  uni- 
verse as  eternal  and  divine,  and  regards  planets,  signs,  and 
decans  as  "the  visible  gods."  In  short,  "there  is  in  the 
heavens  a  great  multitude  of  gods."  -  The  Sun,  however, 
is  superior  to  the  other  planets,  and  as  Aristotle  has  pointed 
out  "makes  the  simplest  movement  of  all  the  heavenly  bodies 
that  travel  in  a  direction  opposite  to  the  whole."  ^  The  Sun 
is  also  the  link  between  the  visible  universe  and  the  intel- 
ligible world,  and  Julian  infers  from  his  middle  station 
among  the  planets  that  he  is  also  king  among  the  intellec- 
tual gods.*  For  behind  his  visible  self  is  the  great  Invisible. 
He  frees  our  souls  entirely  from  the  power  of  "Genesis," 
or  the  force  of  the  stars  exercised  at  nativity,  and  lifts  them 
to  the  world  of  the  pure  intellect.^ 

Julian  believed  in  almost  every  form  of  pagan  divina- 
tion as  well  as  in  astrology.  To  the  oracles  of  Apollo  he  as- 
cribed the  civilizing  of  the  greater  part  of  the  world  through 
the  foundation  of  Greek  colonies  and  the  revelation  of  re- 
ligious and  political  law.^  The  historian  Ammianus  Mar- 
cellinus  '^  tells  us  that  Julian  was  continually  inspecting  en- 
trails of  victims  and  interpreting  dreams  and  omens,  and 
that  he  even  proposed  to  re-open  a  prophetic  fountain  whose 
predictions  were  supposed  to  have  enabled  Hadrian  to  be- 
come emperor,  after  which  that  emperor  blocked  it  up  from 
fear  that  someone  else  might  supplant  him  through  its  instru- 
mentality. In  another  passage  ^  he  defends  Julian  from  the 
charge  of  magic,  saying,  "Inasmuch  as  malicious  persons 
have  attributed  the  use  of  evil  arts  to  learn  the  future  to 
this  ruler  who  was  a  learned  inquirer  into  all  branches  of 
knowledge,  we  shall  briefly  indicate  how  a  wise  man  is  able 

*  I,  482,  498.  '1,368. 

'  I,  405.  I'  419.    ..  „ 

=•1:374-75.  ;?$"'.^"'  ^• 

M,  366-67.  "XXI,    1.   7. 


XI  NEO-PLATONISM  319 

to  acquire  this  by  no  means  trivial  variety  of  learning.  The 
spirit  behind  all  the  elements,  seeing  that  it  is  incessantly 
and  everywhere  active  in  the  prophetic  movement  of  peren- 
nial bodies,  bestows  upon  us  the  gift  of  divination  by  the 
different  arts  which  we  employ;  and  the  forces  of  nature, 
propitiated  by  varied  rites,  as  from  exhaustless  springs  pro- 
vide mankind  with  prophetic  utterances." 

Ammianus  thus  regards  the  arts  of  divination  as  serious  Scientific 
sciences  based  upon  natural  forces,  although  of  course  in  divmation. 
the  characteristic  Neo-Platonic  way  of  thinking  he  confuses 
the  spiritual  and  physical  and  substitutes  propitiatory  rites 
for  scientific  experiments.  His  phrase,  "the  prophetic  move- 
ment of  perennial  bodies"  almost  certainly  means  the  stars 
and  shows  his  belief  in  astrology.  In  another  passage  ^  he 
indicates  the  widespread  trust  in  astrology  among  the  Ro- 
man nobles  of  his  time,  the  later  fourth  century,  by  saying 
that  even  those  "who  deny  that  there  are  superior  powers 
in  the  sky,"  nevertheless  think  it  imprudent  to  appear  in 
public  or  dine  or  bathe  without  having  first  consulted  an 
almanac  as  to  the  whereabouts  of  Mercury  or  the  exact  posi- 
tion of  the  moon  in  Cancer,  The  passage  is  satirical,  no 
doubt,  but  Ammianus  probably  objects  quite  as  much  to 
their  disbelief  in  superior  powers  in  the  sky  as  he  does  to 
the  excess  of  their  superstition.  That  astrology  and  divin- 
ation may  be  studied  scientifically  he  again  indicates  in  a 
description  of  learning  at  Alexandria.  Besides  praising  the 
medical  training  to  be  had  there,  and  mentioning  the  study 
of  geometry,  music,  astronomy,  and  arithmetic,  he  says, 
"In  addition  to  these  subjects  they  cultivate  the  science 
which  reveals  the  ways  of  the  fates."  ^ 

lamblichus's  account  of  theurgy  is  repeated  in  more  con-  Proclus  on 
densed  form  by  Proclus   (412-485)   in  a  brief  treatise  or  ^  ^"^sy- 
fragment  which  is  extant  only  in  its  Latin  translation  by 
the  Florentine  humanist  Ficinus,  entitled  De  sacrificio  et 
inagiaJ    Neither  magic  nor  theurgy,  however,  is  mentioned 

*  XXVIII,  iv,  24.  1497,  along  with  the  De  mysteriis, 

^XXII,  xvi,   17-18.  and   other   works   edited   or  com- 

'  Published  at  Venice  (Aldine),       posed  by  Marsilius  Ficinus.     See 


320 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Neo 

Platonic 
account  of 
magic  bor- 
rowed by 
Christians. 


by  name  in  the  Latin  text.  Proclus  states  that  the  priests 
of  old  built  up  their  sacred  science  by  observing  the  sym- 
pathy existing  between  natural  objects  and  by  arguing  from 
manifest  to  occult  powers.  They  saw  how  things  on  earth 
were  associated  with  things  in  the  heavens  and  further  dis- 
covered how  to  bring  down  divine  virtue  to  this  lower  world 
by  the  force  of  likeness  which  binds  things  together.  Pro- 
clus gives  several  examples  of  plants,  stones,  and  animals 
which  evidence  such  association.  The  cock,  for  instance,  is 
reverenced  by  the  lion  because  both  are  under  the  same 
planet,  the  sun,  but  the  cock  even  more  so  than  the  lion. 
Therefore  demons  who  appear  with  the  heads  of  lions 
(leonina  front e)  vanish  suddenly  at  the  sight  of  a  cock  un- 
less they  chance  to  be  demons  of  the  solar  order.  After 
thus  indicating  the  importance  of  astrology  as  well  as  occult 
virtue  in  theurgy  or  magic,  Proclus  tells  how  demons  are  in- 
voked. Sometimes  a  single  herb  or  stone  "suffices  for  the 
divine  work" ;  sometimes  several  substances  and  rites  must 
be  combined  "to  summon  that  divinity."  When  they  had 
secured  the  presence  of  the  demons,  the  priests  proceeded, 
partly  under  the  instruction  of  the  demons  and  partly  by 
their  own  industrious  interpretation  of  symbols,  to  a  study 
of  the  gods.  "Finally,  leaving  behind  natural  objects  and 
forces  and  even  to  a  great  extent  the  demons,  they  won 
communion  with  the  gods." 

Despite  the  writings  of  Porphyry  and  other  Neo-Platon- 
ists  against  Christianity,  much  use  was  made  by  Christian 
theologians  of  the  fourth  and  fifth  centuries  of  the  Neo- 
Platonic  accounts  of  magic,  astrology,  and  divination,  es- 
pecially of  Porphyry's  Letter  to  Anebo.  Eusebius  in  his 
Praeparatio  Evangelica  -^  made  large  extracts  from  it  on 
these  themes  and  also  from  Porphyry's  work  on  the  Chal- 
dean oracles.  Augustine  in  The  City  of  God  ^  accepted  Por- 

Pars  II,  Apologetica,  Praep. 
Evang.,  IV,  22;  V,  6,  8,  10,  12,  14; 
VI,  I,  4;  XIV,  10  (Migne,  Patro- 
logia  Gracca,  vol.  21). 


also  Prodi  Opera,  ed.  Cousin, 
Paris,  1820-1827,  III,  278;  and 
Kroll,  Analecta  Graeca,  Greiss- 
wald,  1901,  where  a  Greek  trans- 
lation accompanies  the  Latin  text. 
^  Euscbii     Caesariemis     Opera, 


*X,  9-10. 


XI  NEO-PLATONISM  321 

phyry  as  an  authority  on  the  subjects  of  theurgy  and  magic. 
On  the  other  hand,  we  do  not  find  the  Christian  writers  re- 
peating the  attitude  of  Plotinus  that  the  Hfe  of  reason  is 
alone  free  from  magic,  except  as  they  substitute  the  word 
"Christianity"  for  "the  Hfe  of  reason." 

The   Neo-Platonists   showed  some  interest  in  alchemy  Neo- 
as  well  as  in  theurgy  and  astrology.     Berthelot  published  in  ^^^j 
his  Collection  dcs  Alchimistes  Grecs  "a  little  tract  of  posi-  alchemy, 
tive  chemistry"  which  is  extant  under  the  name  of  lam- 
blichus ;  and  Proclus  treated  of  the  relations  between  the 
metals  and  planets  and  the  generation  of  the  metals  under 
the  influence  of  the  stars. ^     Of  Synesius,  who  was  both  a 
Neo-Platonist  and  a  Christian  bishop,  and  who  seems  to 
have  written  works  of  alchemy,  we  shall  treat  in  a  later 
chapter. 

*  Berthelot  (1889),  p.  ix. 


CHAPTER  XII 

AELIAN^  SOLINUS  AND  HORAPOLLO 

Aelian  On  the  Nature  of  Animals — General  character  of  the  work 
— Its  hodge-podge  of  unclassified  detail — Solinus  in  the  middle  ages — 
His  date — General  character  of  his  work;  its  relation  to  Pliny — Animals 
and  gems — Occult  medicine — Democritus  and  Zoroaster  not  regarded 
as  magicians — Some  bits  of  astrology — Alexander  the  Great — The 
Hieroglyphics  of  Horapollo — Marvels  of  animals — Animals  and  as- 
trology— The  cynocephalus — Horapollo  the  cosmopolitan. 

From  mystic  and  theurgic  compositions  we  return  to  works 
of  the  declining  Roman  Empire  which  deal  more  directly 
with  nature  but,  it  must  be  confessed,  in  a  manner  somewhat 
fantastic.  About  the  beginning  of  the  third  century,  Aelian 
of  Praeneste,  who  is  included  by  Philostratus  in  his  Lives 
of  the  Sophists,  wrote  On  the  Nature  of  Animals}  Its 
seventeen  books,  written  in  Greek,  which  Aelian  used  flu- 
ently despite  his  Latin  birth,  are  believed  to  have  reached 
us  partly  in  interpolated  form  through  two  families  of 
manuscripts,  of  which  the  older  and  less  interpolated  text 
is  found  in  a  thirteenth  century  manuscript  at  Paris  and  a 
somewhat  earlier  Vatican  codex.^  A  number  of  its  chap- 
ters are  similar  to  and  perhaps  borrowed  from  Pliny's 
Natural  History;  at  any  rate  they  are  commonplaces  of  an- 
cient science ;  but  the  work  also  has  a  marked  individuality. 
Parallels  have  also  been  noted  between  this  work  and  the 
later  Hexaemeron  of  the  church  father  Basil.  Aelian  was 
much  cited  in  Byzantine  literature  and  learning,  and  if  he 
was  not  directly  used  in  the  Latin  west,  at  least  the  attitude 

*  Ilepi  fciwv  IStoTT/Tos.   I  have  used  henceforth  be   cited  without  title 
both  the  editio  princeps  by  Gesner,  in  the  notes. 
Zurich,  1556,  and  the  critical  edi- 
tion  by   R.   Hercher,   Paris,    1858,  *  See  PW,  and  Christ,  Gesch.  d. 
and  Teubner,  1864.    The  work  will  griech.  Litt.,  for  further  details. 

322 


CHAP.xii  AELIAN,  SOLINUS,  AND  HORAPOLLO  323 

toward  animals  which  he  displays  and  his  selection  of  mate- 
rial concerning  them  are  as  apt  precursors  of  medieval 
Latin  as  of  medieval  Greek  scientific  literature. 

In  preface  and  epilogue  Aelian  himself  adequately  indi-  General 
cates  the  character  of  his  work.  He  is  impressed  by  the  of^^^g  ^^ 
customs  and  characteristics  of  animals,  and  marvels  at  their  work, 
wisdom  and  native  shrewdness,  their  justice  and  modesty, 
their  affection  and  piety,  which  should  put  human  beings 
to  blush.  Thus  Aelian's  work  is  marked  by  that  tendency 
which  runs  through  ancient  and  medieval  literature  to  ad- 
mire actions  in  the  irrational  brutes  which  seem  to  indicate 
almost  human  intelligence  and  virtue  on  their  part,  and  to 
moralize  therefrom  at  the  expense  of  human  beings.  An- 
other striking  feature  of  his  work  is  its  utterly  whimsical 
and  haphazard  order.  He  mentions  things  simply  as  they 
happen  to  occur  to  him.  This  fact,  too,  he  recognizes,  but 
refuses  to  apologize  for,  stating  that  it  suits  him,  if  it  does 
not  suit  anyone  else,  and  that  he  regards  a  mixed-up  order 
as  more  motley,  variegated,  and  pleasing.  Not  only  does 
he  attempt  no  classification  whatever  of  his  animals  and 
mention  snakes  and  quadrupeds  and  birds  in  the  same  breath ; 
he  also  does  not  complete  the  treatment  of  a  given  animal  in 
one  passage  but  may  scatter  detached  items  about  it  through- 
out his  work.  There  is,  for  instance,  probably  at  least  one 
chapter  concerning  elephants  in  each  of  his  seventeen  books. 

It  would  therefore  be  absurd  for  us  to  attempt  any  logi-  its  hodge- 
cal  arrangement  in  discussing  his  contents;  we  may  do  jus-  P^'^p  9^ 
tice  to  him  most  adequately  by  adopting  his  own  lack  of  fied  detail, 
method  and  noting  a  few  items  and  topics  taken  more  or  less 
at  random  from  his  work.     Ants  never  go  out  in  the  new 
moon.    Yet  they  neither  gaze  at  the  sky,  nor  count  the  num- 
ber of  days  on  their  fingers,  like  the  learned  Babylonians  and 
Chaldeans,  but  have  this  marvelous  gift  from  nature.^     In 
sexual  intercourse  the  female  viper  conceives  through  the 
mouth  and  bites  off  the  head  of  the  male;  afterwards  her 
young  gnaw  their  way  out  of  her  vitals.     "What  have  your 

^  I,  22. 


324  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

Oresteses  and  Alcmaeons  to  say  to  that,  my  dear  trage- 
dians?" ^  Doves  put  laurel  boughs  in  their  nests  to  guard 
against  fascination  and  the  evil  eye,  and  the  hoopoe  simi- 
larly employs  ablavrov  or  KaWlrpLxov  as  an  amulet;^  and 
other  unreasoning  animals  guard  against  sorcery  by  some 
mystic  and  marvelous  natural  power.  Another  chapter 
treats  of  divinations  from  the  crow  and  how  hairs  are  dyed 
black  with  its  eggs.^  Others  tell  us  of  the  generation  of 
serpents  from  the  marrow  of  a  dead  man's  spine,*  and  of 
venomous  women  like  Medea  and  Circe  who  are  worse  than 
the  asp  with  its  incurable  sting,  since  they  kill  by  mere 
touch.  ^ 

We  go  on  to  read  of  swift  little  beasts  called  Pyrigoni 
who  are  generated  from  fire  and  live  in  it,  of  salamanders 
who  extinguish  flames,  of  the  remedies  used  by  the  tortoise 
against  snakes,  of  the  chastity  of  doves  whose  marriages 
never  result  in  divorce,  and  of  the  incontinence  of  the  par- 
tridge.® Also  of  the  jealousies  of  certain  animals  like  the 
stag  which  hides  its  right  horn,  the  lizard  who  devours  its 
cast-off  skin,  and  the  mare  who  eats  the  hippomanes  from 
its  colt,  lest  men  obtain  these  precious  substances,'^  Of  the 
care  taken  by  storks,  herons,  and  pelicans  of  their  aged 
parents.^  How  the  swallow  by  the  virtue  of  an  herb  gives 
sight  to  its  young  who  are  born  blind,  and  how  a  hoopoe 
found  an  herb  whose  virtue  dissolved  the  mud  with  which 
the  caretaker  of  a  building  had  plugged  up  the  hole  in  the 
wall  which  it  used  for  its  nest.^  How  the  lion  and  basilisk 
fear  the  cock,  and  of  a  lake  without  fish  in  a  place  where 
the  cocks  do  not  crow.^° 

How  elephants  venerate  the  waxing  moon ;  how  the  wea- 
sel eats  rue  when  about  to  fight  the  snake;  and  of  the  jeal- 

*  I,  24.  "  I,  54. 

=■  I,  35.    D.  W.  Thompson,  Glos-         "  II,  2  and  31 ;  III,  5. 
sary  of  Greek  Birds,  p.  57,  notes  'III,  17. 
that  in  the  Birds  of  Aristophanes,          'III,  23  and  25. 
where    the    hoopoe    appears,    "the          'III,    26;    in    I,    45,   the    wood- 
mysterious  root  in  verse  654  is  the  pecker  similarly  employs  the  vir- 
magical  &SLavTov"  tue  of  an  herb  to  remove  a  stone 

■  I,  48.  blocking  the  entrance  to  its  nest. 

*  I,  52.  "  III,  32  and  38. 


XII  AELIAN,  SOLINUS,  AND  HORAPOLLO  325 

ousy  of  the  hedge-hog  and  lynx,  the  latter  concealing  his 
precious  urine,  the  other  watering  his  own  hide  when  he  is 
captured  in  order  to  spoil  it.-^  How  the  Indians  fight  grif- 
fins when  collecting  gold.^  How  the  presence  of  a  cock  aids 
a  woman's  delivery.^  Of  unnamed  beasts  in  Libya  who 
know  how  to  count  and  leave  an  eleventh  part  of  their  prey 
untouched.*  That  the  sea  dragon  is  easily  captured  with 
the  left  hand  but  not  with  the  right.^  Dragons  know  the 
force  of  herbs  and  cure  themselves  with  some  and  increase 
their  venom  with  others.®  How  dogs,  cows,  and  other  ani- 
mals sense  a  famine  or  plague  be  forehand. ''^  How  the 
Egyptians  by  their  magic  charm  birds  from  the  sky  and 
snakes  from  their  holes. ^  When  it  rains  in  Eg>'pt,  mice  are 
born  from  the  small  drops  and  plague  the  country.  Traps 
and  fences  and  ditches  are  of  no  avail  against  them,  as  they 
can  leap  over  trenches  and  walls.  Consequently  the  Egyp- 
tians are  forced  to  pray  God  to  end  the  calamity,^ — an  in- 
teresting variant  on  the  Old  Testament  account  of  the 
plagues  of  Egypt. 

In  dogs  there  exists  a  certain  dialectical  faculty  of  ratioc- 
ination.^^ The  weather  may  be  predicted  from  birds,  quad- 
rupeds, and  flies.^^  The  she-goat  can  cure  suffusion  of  its 
eyes.^-  Eagles  drop  tortoises  on  rocks  to  break  their  shells 
and  the  bald-headed  poet  Aeschylus  met  his  death  by  having 
his  pate  mistaken  thus  for  a  smooth  round  stone.^^  Some 
predict  the  future  by  birds,  others  by  entrails,  or  by  grains, 
sieves,  and  cheeses;  the  Lycians  practice  divination  by  fish.^* 
A  stork  whom  a  widow  of  Tarentum  helped  when  it  was 
too  young  to  fly  brought  her  a  luminous  precious  stone  the 
following  year.^^  Solon  did  not  have  to  enact  a  law  ordering 
'IV,  10,  14,  17.  "VII,  14. 

WYr'  ^^-  "VII,    16.      The    story    is    also 

,}V,  29.  found  in  Pliny  NH,  X,  3,  where 

5  \j: '  53-  it    is    added    that    Aeschylus    re- 

g  V>  2>7-  mained    cut-doors    that    day,    be- 

,  y {;'  4-  cause  an  oracle  predicted  that  he 

g^}'    10.  would  be  killed   by  the  fall  of  a 

^  VI,    22'  (tortoise's)  house. 

"Vi,^59.  "VIII,  5. 

"VII,   7-8.  "VIII,  22. 


326  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

children  to  support  their  aged  parents  in  the  case  of  lions, 
whose  cubs  are  taught  by  nature  filial  piety  toward  their 
elders.^  Only  the  horn  of  the  Scythian  ass  can  hold  the 
water  of  the  Arcadian  river  Styx;  Alexander  the  Great  sent 
a  sample  of  it  to  Delphi  with  some  accompanying  verses 
which  Aelian  quotes.^  In  Epirus  dragons  sacred  to  Apollo 
are  employed  in  divination,  and  in  the  Lavinian  Grove  drag- 
ons spit  out  again  the  frumenty  offered  them  by  unchaste 
virgins.^  By  flying  beneath  it  an  eagle  saved  the  life  of  its 
young  one  who  had  been  thrown  down  from  a  tower.*  Dif- 
ferent fish  eat  different  sea  herbs.^  There  are  fish  who 
live  in  boiling  water.®  There  are  scattered  mentions  of  the 
marvels  of  India  throughout  Aelian' s  work,  and  in  his  six- 
teenth book  the  first  fourteen  chapters  are  almost  exclu- 
sively concerned  with  the  animals  of  that  land. 
Solinus  A  well-known  work  in  the  middle  ages  dating  from  the 

middle         period  of  the  Roman  Empire  was  the  Collectanea  rerum 
ages.  memorabilium  or  Polyhistor  of  Solinus.     Mommsen's  edi- 

tion lists  153  manuscripts  from  32  places,'^  and  we  shall  find 
many  citations  of  Solinus  in  our  later  medieval  authors. 
Martianus  Capella  and  Isidore  were  the  first  to  make  exten- 
sive use  of  his  work.  In  the  thirteenth  century  Albertus 
Magnus  had  little  respect  for  Solinus  as  an  authority  and 
expressed  more  than  once  the  quite  accurate  opinion  that 
his  work  was  full  of  lies.  Nevertheless  copies  of  it  con- 
tinued to  abound  in  the  fourteenth  and  fifteenth  centuries, 
and  by  1554  five  printed  editions  had  appeared.  "From  it 
directly  come  most  of  the  fables  in  works  of  object  so  dif- 
ferent as  those  of  Dicuil,  Isidore,  Capella,  and  Priscian."  ^ 
His  date.  The  first  extant  author  to  make  use  of  Solinus  is  Augus- 

tine in  The  City  of  God,  while  he  is  first  named  in  the  Gen- 
ealogus  of  455  A.  D.   None  of  the  manuscripts  of  the  work 

^IX,    I.  rum  memorabilium  iterum  recen- 

'X,    40.  suit   Th.    Mommsen,   Berlin,    189S, 

'  XI,  2  and  16.                                    pp.    xxxi-li.     Beazley,    Dawn    of 

*XII,    21.  Modern  Geography,  I,  520-2,  lists 

•  XIII,  3.  152  MSS. 

*  XIV,  19.  *  Beazley,     Dawn     of     Modern 
'  C.  lulii  Solini  Collectanea  re-      Geography.  1,  247. 


XII  AELIAN,  SOLINUS,  AND  HORAPOLLO  327 

antedate  the  ninth  century,  but  many  of  them  have  copied 
an  earlier  subscription  from  a  manuscript  written  "by  the 
zeal  and  diligence  of  our  lord  Theodosius,  the  unconquered 
prince."  This  is  taken  to  refer  to  the  emperor  Theodosius 
II,  401-450.  The  work  itself,  however,  has  no  Christian 
characteristics;  on  the  contrary  it  is  very  fond  of  mentioning 
places  famed  in  pagan  religion  and  Greek  mythology  and 
of  recounting  miracles  and  marvels  connected  with  heathen 
shrines  and  rites.  Indeed,  Solinus  seldom,  if  ever,  men- 
tions anything  later  than  the  first  century  of  our  era.  He 
speaks  of  Byzantium,  not  of  Constantinople,  and  makes  no 
mention  of  the  Roman  provinces  as  divided  in  the  system  of 
Diocletian.  His  book,  however,  is  a  compilation  from  earlier 
writings  so  that  we  need  not  expect  allusions  to  his  own 
age.  The  Latin  style  and  general  literary  make-up  of  the 
work  are  characteristic  of  the  declining  empire  and  early 
medieval  period.  Mommsen  was  inclined  to  date  Solinus  in 
the  third  rather  than  the  fourth  century,  but  the  work  seems 
to  have  been  revised  about  the  sixth  century,  after  which 
date  it  became  customary  to  call  it  the  Polyhistor  rather  than 
the  Collectanea  rerum  memorahilium.  It  is  also  referred  to, 
however,  as  De  mirabilibus  mundi,  or  Wonders  of  the 
World. 

The  work  is  primarily  a  geography  and  is  arranged  by  General 
countries  and  places,  beginning  with  Rome  and  Italy.     As  character 
each  locality  is  considered,  Solinus  sometimes  tells  a  little  work:  its 
of  its  history,  but  is  especially  inclined  to  recount  miracu-  ^o  Pliny, 
lous  religious  events  or  natural  marvels  associated  with  that 
particular  region.     Thus  in  describing  two  lakes  he  rather 
apologizes   for  mentioning  the  first  at  all  because   it  can 
scarcely  be  called  miraculous,  but  assures  us  that  the  second 
"is  regarded  as  very  extraordinary."  ^     Sometimes  he  di- 
gresses to  other  topics  such  as  calendar  reform.^     Solinus 
drav/s  both  his  geographical  data  and  further  details  very 
largely    from    Pliny's   Natural   History;   but   inasmuch    as 
Pliny  treated  of  these  matters  in  separate  books,  Solinus  has 

*  Mommsen  (1895),  p.  48.  'Ibid.,  p.  7. 


328  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

to  re-organize  the  material.  He  also  selects  simply  a  few 
particulars  from  Pliny's  wealth  of  detail  on  any  given  sub- 
ject, and  furthermore  considerably  alters  Pliny's  wording, 
sometimes  condensing  the  thought,  sometimes  amplifying 
the  phraseology — apparently  in  an  effort  to  make  the  point 
clearer  and  easier  reading.  Of  Pliny's  thirty-seven  books 
only  those  from  the  third  to  the  thirteenth  inclusive  and  the 
last  book  are  used  to  any  extent  by  Solinus.  That  is  to  say, 
he  either  was  acquainted  with  only,  or  confined  himself  to, 
those  books  dealing  with  geography,  man  and  other  animals, 
and  gems,  omitting  almost  entirely,  except  for  the  twelfth 
and  thirteenth  books,  Pliny's  elaborate  treatment  of  vegeta- 
tion and  of  medicinal  simples  -^  and  discussion  of  metals  and 
the  fine  arts.  Solinus  does  not  acknowledge  his  great  debt 
to  Pliny  in  particular,  although  he  keeps  alluding  to  the 
fulness  with  which  everything  has  already  been  discussed 
by  past  authors,  and  although  he  cites  other  writers  who  are 
almost  unknown  to  us.  Of  his  known  sources  Pomponius 
Mela  is  the  chief  after  Pliny  but  is  used  much  less.  On  the 
other  hand,  the  number  of  passages  for  which  Mommsen 
was  unable  to  give  any  source  is  not  inconsiderable.  As  may 
have  been  already  inferred,  the  work  of  Solinus  is  brief ; 
the  text  alone  would  scarcely  fill  one  hundred  pages.^ 
Animals  It  would  perhaps  be  rash  to  conjecture  which  quality 

and  gems,  commended  the  book  most  to  the  following  period  :  its  handy 
size,  or  its  easy  style  and  fairly  systematic  arrangement,  or 
its  emphasis  upon  marvels.  The  last  characteristic  is  at 
least  the  most  germane  to  our  investigation.  Solinus  ren- 
dered the  service,  if  we  may  so  term  it,  of  reducing  Pliny's 
treatment  of  animals  and  precious  stones  in  particular  to  a 
few  common  examples,  which  either  were  already  the  best 
known  or  became  so  as  a  result  of  his  selection.  Indeed, 
King  was  of  the  opinion  that  the  descriptions  of  gems  in 
Solinus  were  more  precise,  technical,  and  systematic  than 

^Yet  one  medieval  MS  of   So-  century,  fols.  156-74- 

linus  is  described  as  De  variorum  ^  In   Mommsen's  edition  critical 

herbarum  et  radicum  qualitate  et  apparatus  occupies  more  than  one- 

virtute  mcdica;  Vienna  3959,  15th  half  of  the  216  pages. 


XII  AELIAN,  SOLINUS,  AND  HORAPOLLO  329 

those  in  Pliny,  and  found  his  notices  "often  extremely  use- 
ful." ^  Solinus  describes  such  animals  as  the  wolf,  lynx, 
bear,  lion,  hyena,  onager  or  wild  ass,  basilisk,  crocodile, 
hippopotamus,  phoenix,  dolphin,  and  chameleon ;  and  re- 
counts the  marvelous  properties  of  such  gems  as  achates  or 
agate,  galactites,  catochites,  crystal,  gagates,  adamant,  helio- 
trope, hyacinth,  and  paeanites.  The  dragons  of  India  and 
Ethiopia  also  occupy  his  attention,  as  they  did  that  of  Phi- 
lostratus  in  the  Life  of  Apolloniits  of  Tyana;  indeed,  he  re- 
peats in  different  words  the  statement  found  in  Philostratus 
that  they  swim  far  out  to  sea.^  In  Sardinia,  on  the  con- 
trary, there  are  no  snakes,  but  a  poisonous  ant  exists  there. 
Fortunately  there  are  also  healing  waters  there  with  which 
to  counteract  its  venom,  but  there  is  also  native  to  Sardinia 
an  herb  called  Sardonia  which  causes  those  who  eat  it  to  die 
of  laughter.^ 

Although  Solinus  makes  no  use  of  Pliny's  medical  books.  Occult 
he  shows  considerable  interest  in  the  healing  properties  of  "^  *'^'"^' 
simples  and  in  medicine.  He  tells  us  that  those  who  slept 
in  the  shrine  of  Aesculapius  at  Epidaurus  were  warned  in 
dreams  how  to  heal  their  diseases,'*  and  that  the  third  daugh- 
ter of  Aeetes,  named  Angitia,  devoted  herself  "to  resisting 
disease  by  the  salubrious  science"  of  medicine.^  According 
to  Solinus  Circe  as  well  as  Medea  was  a  daughter  of  Aeetes, 
but  usually  in  Greek  mythology  she  is  represented  as  his 
sister. 

*  C.  W.  King,  The  Natural  His-  VII,  52)  speaks  of  as  a  premoni- 
tory. Ancient  and  Modern,  of  tory  sign  of  death  in  cases  of 
Precious  Stones  and  Gems,  Lon-  madness,  "is  not  the  indication  of 
don,  1865,  p.  6.  mirth,  but  what  has  been  termed 

=■  Mommsen  (1895),  PP.  132,  188.  ^^^  ""tl"'  Sardoniciis,  the  'Sardonic 

l^ygj^^    produced  by  a  convulsive 

*  Ibid.,  46-7.  Mommsen  could  action  of  the  muscles  of  the  face." 
give  no  source  for  these  state-  This  form  of  death  may  be  what 
ments  concerning  Sardinia,  and  Solinus  has  in  mind.  Agricola  in 
they  donot  appear  to  be  in  Pliny.  his  work  on  metallurgy  and  mines 
But  it  is  from  a  footnote  in  the  still  believes  in  the  poisonous  ants 
English  translation  of  the  Natural  of  Sardinia;  De  re  metaUica,  VI, 
History  by  Bostock  and  Riley  (II,  near  close,  pp.  216-7,  in  Hoover's 
208,    citing    Dalechamps,   and    Le-  translation,   1912. 

maire.  III,  201)   that  I  learn  that  "Mommsen  (1895),  p.  57. 

the   laughter   which    Pliny    (NH,  '^ Ibid.,  p.  39. 


CHAP. 


Democri- 
tus  and 
Zoroaster 
not  re- 
garded as 
magicians. 


Some 
bits  of 
astrology. 


330  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 

This  allusion  to  Circe  and  Medea  shows  that  magic,  to 
which  medicine  and  pharmacy  are  apparently  akin,  does  not 
pass  unnoticed  in  Solinus's  page.  He  copies  from  Mela  the 
account  of  the  periodical  transformation  of  the  Neuri  into 
wolves.^  But  instead  of  accusing  Democritus  of  having  em- 
ployed magic,  as  Pliny  does,  Solinus  represents  him  as  en- 
gaging in  contests  with  the  Magi,  in  which  he  made  frequent 
use  of  the  stone  catochites  in  order  to  demonstrate  the  oc- 
cult power  of  nature.^  That  is  to  say,  Democritus  was  ap- 
parently opposing  science  to  magic  and  showing  that  all  the 
latter's  feats  could  be  duplicated  or  improved  upon  by  em- 
ploying natural  forces.  In  two  other  passages  ^  Solinus 
calls  Democritus  physicus,  or  scientist,  and  affirms  that  his 
birth  in  Abdera  did  more  to  make  that  town  famous  than 
any  other  thing  connected  with  it,  despite  the  fact  that  it 
was  founded  by  and  named  after  the  sister  of  Diomedes. 
Zoroaster,  too,  whom  Pliny  called  the  founder  of  the  magic 
art,  is  not  spoken  of  as  a  magician  by  Solinus,  although  he 
is  mentioned  three  times  and  is  described  as  "most  skilled 
in  the  best  arts,"  and  is  cited  concerning  the  power  of  coral 
and  of  the  gem  aetites^ 

It  is  not  part  of  Solinus's  plan  to  describe  the  heavens, 
but  he  occasionally  alludes  to  "the  discipline  of  the  stars,"  ^ 
as  he  calls  astronomy  or  astrology.  On  the  authority  of  L. 
Tarrutius,  "most  renowned  of  astrologers,"  ®  he  tells  us  that 
the  foundations  of  the  walls  of  Rome  were  laid  by  Romulus 
in  his  twenty-second  year  on  the  eleventh  day  of  the  kalends 
of  May  between  the  second  and  third  hours,  when  Jupiter 
was  in  Pisces,  the  sun  in  Taurus,  the  moon  in  Libra,  and 
the  other  four  planets  in  the  sign  of  the  scorpion.    He  also 


^Mommsen   (1895),  p.  82. 
''Ibid.,  pp.  45-46. 
*Ioid.,  pp.    13,   68. 
*lbid.,  pp.  18,  41,  159- 
'^  Ibid.,    p.     50,    and    elsewhere, 
"siderum  disciplinam." 
''Ibid.,    p.    5,    "mathematicorum 


nobilissimus."  Solinus  probably 
takes  this  from  Varro,  who,  as 
Plutarch  informs  us  in  his  Life  of 
Romulus,  asked  "Tarrutius,  his 
familiar  acquaintance,  a  good 
philosopher  and  mathematician," 
to  calculate  the  horoscope  of 
Romulus.     See  above,  p.  209. 


XII  AELIAN,  SOLINUS,  AND  HOR APOLLO  331 

speaks  of  the  star  Arcturus  destroying  the  Argive  fleet  off 
Euboea  on  its  return  from  Ilium. ^ 

Alexander  the  Great  figures  prominently  in  the  pages  of  Alexander 
Solinus,  being  mentioned  a  score  of  times,  and  this  too  cor- 
responds to  the  medieval  interest  in  the  Macedonian  con- 
queror. Stories  concerning  him  are  repeated  from  Pliny, 
but  Solinus  also  displays  further  information.  He  insists 
that  Philip  was  truly  his  father,  although  he  adds  that  Olym- 
pias  strove  to  acquire  a  nobler  father  for  him,  when  she 
affirmed  that  she  had  had  intercourse  with  a  dragon,  and 
that  Alexander  tried  to  have  himself  considered  of  divine 
descent.^  The  statement  concerning  Olympias  suggests  the 
story  of  Nectanebus,  of  which  a  later  chapter  will  treat,  but 
that  individual  is  not  mentioned,  although  Aristotle  and  Cal- 
listhenes  are  spoken  of  as  Alexander's  tutors,  so  that  it  is 
doubtful  if  Solinus  was  acquainted  with  the  Pseudo-CaUis- 
thenes.  He  describes  Alexander's  line  of  march  with  fair 
accuracy  and  not  in  the  totally  incorrect  manner  of  the 
Pseud  o-Callisthenes. 

In  seeking  a  third  text  and  author  of  the  same  type  as  The 
Aelian  and  Solinus  to  round  out  the  present  chapter,  our  giyphicsoi 
choice  unhesitatingly  falls  upon  the  Hieroglyphics  of  Hora-  Horapollo. 
polio,  a  work  which  pretends  to  explain  the  meaning  of  the 
written  symbols  employed  by  the  ancient  Egyptian  priests, 
but  which  is  really  principally  concerned  with  the  same  mar- 
velous habits  and  properties  of  animals  of  which  Aelian 
treated.     In  brief  the  idea  is  that  these  characteristics  of 
animals  must  be  known  in  order  to  comprehend  the  signifi- 
cance of  the  animal  figures  in  the  ancient  hieroglyphic  writ- 
ing.    Horapollo  is  supposed  to  have  written  in  the  Egyptian 
language  in  perhaps  the  fourth  or  fifth  century  of  our  era,^ 
but  his  work  is  extant  only  in  the  Greek  translation  of  it 
made  by  a  Philip  who  lived  a  century  or  two  later  and  who 
seems  to  have  made  some  additions  of  his  own.* 

^Mommsen  (1905),  pp.  75-6.  ''I  have  used  the  text  and  Eng- 

^Ibid.,  p.  66.  lish    translation    of    A.    T.    Cory, 

*  PW,    for   the    problem    of   his  The    Hieroglyphics   of   Horapollo 

identity  and  further  bibliography.  Nilous,  1840.     Philip's  Greek  is  so 


332  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

Marvels  of  The  zoology  of  Horapollo  is  for  the  most  part  not  novel, 
but  repeats  the  same  erroneous  notions  that  may  be  found 
in  Aristotle's  History  of  Animals,  Pliny's  Natural  History, 
Aelian,  and  other  ancient  authors.  Again  we  hear  of  the 
basilisk's  fatal  breath,  of  the  beaver's  discarded  testicles,  of 
the  unnatural  methods  of  conception  of  the  weasel  and 
viper,  of  the  bear's  licking  its  cubs  into  shape,  of  the  kind- 
ness of  storks  to  their  parents,  of  wasps  generated  from  a 
dead  horse,  of  the  phoenix,  of  the  swan's  song,  of  the  sick 
lion's  eating  an  ape  to  cure  himself,  of  the  bull  tamed  by 
tying  it  to  the  branch  of  a  wild  fig  tree,  of  the  elephant's 
fear  of  a  ram  or  a  dog  and  how  it  buries  its  tusks. ^  Less 
familiar  perhaps  are  the  assertions  that  the  mare  miscarries, 
if  she  merely  treads  on  a  wolf's  tracks;^  that  the  pigeon 
cures  itself  by  placing  laurel  in  its  nest;  ^  that  putting  the 
wings  of  a  bat  on  an  ant-hill  will  prevent  the  ants  from  com- 
ing out.*  The  statement  that  if  the  hyena,  when  hunted, 
turns  to  the  right,  it  will  slay  its  pursuer,  while  if  it  turns 
to  the  left,  it  will  be  slain  by  him,  is  also  found  in  Pliny.^ 
But  his  long  enumeration  of  virtues  ascribed  to  parts  of 
the  hyena  by  the  Magi  does  not  include  the  assertion  in 
Horapollo's  next  chapter  ®  that  a  man  girded  with  a  hyena 
skin  can  pass  through  the  ranks  of  his  enemies  without  in- 
jury, although  it  ascribes  somewhat  similar  virtues  to  the 
animal's  skin.  In  Horapollo  it  is  the  hawk  rather  than  the 
eagle  which  surpasses  other  winged  creatures  in  its  ability 
to  gaze  at  the  sun;  hence  physicians  use  the  hawk-weed  in 
eye-cures.'^ 

bad  that  some  would  date  it  in  the  II,  44  and  39  and  76-7  and  85-6 

fourteenth    or    fifteenth    century.  and  88. 

The    oldest    extant    Greek    codex  ^  II,  45. 

was  purchased  in  Andros  in  1419.  MI,  46;   Aelian   says  the  same, 

The    work     was     translated     into  however,  as  we  stated  above. 

Latin  by  the   fifteenth   century  at  "  II,   64. 

latest;  see  Vienna  3255,  15th  cen-  "NH,  XXVIII,  27. 

tury,    82    fols.,    Horapollo,    Hiero-  °II,  72. 

glyphicon  latirie  versorum  liber  I  '  I,  6.    According  to  Pliny  (NH, 

et  libri  II  introductio  cum  figuris  XX,   26),   the   hawk   sprinkles   its 

calamo  exaratis  et  coloratis.  eyes  with  the  juice  of  this  herb; 

^I,  i;  II,  61;  II,  65;  II,  36  and  Apuleius      (Metamorphoses,     cap. 

59;  II,  57;  II,  83;  I,  34-5;  il,  57;  30)  says  that  the  eagle  does  so. 


XII  AELIAN,  SOLINUS,  AND  HORAPOLLO  333 

Animals  also  serve  as  astronomical  or  astrological  sym-  Animals 
bols  in  the  system  of  hieroglyphic  writing  as  interpreted  by  astrology. 
Horapollo.  Not  only  does  a  palm  tree  represent  the  year 
because  it  puts  forth  a  new  branch  every  new  moon/  but 
the  phoenix  denotes  the  magnus  annus  in  the  course  of  which 
the  heavenly  bodies  complete  their  revolutions.^  The  scarab 
rolls  his  ball  of  dung  from  east  to  west  and  gives  it  the  shape 
of  the  universe.^  He  buries  it  for  twenty-eight  days  con- 
formably to  the  course  of  the  moon  through  the  zodiac,  but 
he  has  thirty  toes  to  correspond  to  the  days  of  the  month. 
As  there  is  no  female  scarab,  so  there  is  no  male  vulture. 
The  female  vulture  symbolizes  the  Egyptian  year  by  spend- 
ing five  days  in  conceiving  by  the  wind,  one  hundred  and 
twenty  in  pregnancy,  the  same  period  in  rearing  its  young, 
and  the  remaining  one  hundred  and  twenty  days  in  prepar- 
ing itself  to  repeat  the  process.*  The  vulture  also  visits 
battlefields  seven  days  in  advance  and  by  the  direction  of  its 
glance  indicates  which  army  will  be  defeated. 

The  cynocephalus,  dog-headed  ape,  or  baboon,  was  men-  The  cyno- 
tioned  several  times  by  Pliny,  but  Horapollo  gives  more  ^^^ 
specific  information  concerning  it,  chiefly  of  an  astrological 
character.  It  is  born  circumcised  and  is  reared  in  temples 
in  order  to  learn  from  it  the  exact  hour  of  lunar  eclipses,  at 
which  times  it  neither  sees  nor  eats,  while  the  female  ex  gen- 
italibus  sanguinem  emittit.  The  cynocephalus  represents  the 
inhabitable  world  which  has  seventy-two  primitive  parts, 
because  the  animal  dies  and  is  buried  piecemeal  by  the  priests 
during  a  period  of  as  many  days,  until  at  the  end  of  the 
seventy-second  day  life  has  entirely  departed  from  the  last 
remnant  of  its  carcass.^  The  cynocephalus  not  only  marks 
the  time  of  eclipses  but  at  the  equinoxes  makes  water  twelve 
times  by  day  and  by  night,  marking  off  the  hours ;  hence  a 
figure  of  it  is  carved  by  the  Egyptians  on  their  water-clocks.® 
Horapollo  associates  together  the  god  of  the  universe  and 
fate  and  the  stars  which  are  five  in  number,  for  he  believes 

*I,  3.  "I.  II- 

'II,  57.  "I.  14. 

•I,   10.  "I.  16. 


334       MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE     chap,  xii 

that  five  planets  carry  out  the  economy  of  the  universe  and 
that  they  are  subject  to  God's  government.^ 
Horapollo  Horapollo  cannot  be  given  high  rank  either  as  a  zoolo- 

poHtan"^°"  S^^^  ^"^  astronomer,  or  a  philologer  and  archaeologist;  but 
at  least  he  was  no  narrow  nationalist  and  had  some  respect 
for  history.  The  Egyptians,  he  says,  "denote  a  man  who 
has  never  left  his  own  country  by  a  human  figure  with  the 
head  of  an  ass,  because  he  neither  hears  any  history  nor 
knows  of  what  is  going  on  abroad."  ^ 

*I,  13.  ^I»  23. 


Foreword. 

Chapter 

13- 

<( 

14, 

(( 

15- 

(( 

16. 

BOOK  II.     EARLY  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT 

The  Book  of  Enoch. 

Philo  Judaeus. 

The  Gnostics. 

The  Christian  Apocrypha. 

17.  The    Recognitions    of    Clement    and    Simon 
Magus. 

18.  The  Confession  of  Cyprian  and  some  similar 
stories. 

19.  Origen  and  Celsus. 

20.  Other  Christian  Discussion  of  Magic  before 
Augustine. 

21.  Christianity    and    Natural     Science;     Basil, 
Epiphanius,  and  the  Physiologus. 

22.  Augustine  on  Magic  and  Astrology. 

23.  The  Fusion  of  Pagan  and  Christian  Thought 
in  the  Fourth  and  Fifth  Centuries. 


335 


BOOK  II.     EARLY  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT 

FOREWORD 

We  now  turn  back  chronologically  to  the  point  from 
which  we  started  in  our  survey  of  classical  science  and 
magic  in  order  to  trace  the  development  of  Christian  thought 
in  regard  to  the  same  subjects.  How  far  did  Christianity 
break  with  ancient  science  and  superstition?  To  what  ex- 
tent did  it  borrow  from  them  ? 

It  has  often  been  remarked  that,  as  a  new  religion  comes  Magic  and 
to  prevail  in  a  society,  the  old  rites  are  discredited  and  pro-  I'^ligion- 
hibited  as  magic.  The  faith  and  ceremonies  of  the  majority, 
performed  publicly,  are  called  religion :  the  discarded  cult, 
now  practiced  only  privately  and  covertly  by  a  minority, 
is  stigmatized  as  magic  and  contrary  to  the  general  good. 
Thus  we  shall  hear  Christian  writers  condemn  the  pagan 
oracles  and  auguries  as  arts  of  divination,  and  classify  the 
ancient  gods  as  demons  of  the  same  sort  as  those  invoked 
in  the  magic  arts.  Conversely,  when  a  new  religion  is  being 
introduced,  is  as  yet  regarded  as  a  foreign  faith,  and  is 
still  only  the  private  worship  of  a  minority,  the  majority 
regard  it  as  outlandish  magic.  And  this  we  shall  find  illus- 
trated by  the  accusations  of  sorcery  and  magic  heaped  upon 
Jesus  by  the  Jews,  and  upon  the  Jews  and  the  early  Chris- 
tians by  a  world  long  accustomed  to  pagan  rites.  The  same 
bandying  back  and  forth  of  the  charge  of  magic  occurred  be- 
tween Mohammed  and  the  Meccans.^ 

It  is  perhaps  generally  assumed  that  the  men  of  the  mid-  Relation 

die    ages    were    widely    read    in    and    deeply    influenced  ^^j-iy 

by  the  fathers  of  the  early  church,  but  at  least  for  our  sub-  Christiaji 

1     •  1         1  11  ^"^  medie- 

ject  this  influence  has  hardly  been  treated  either  broadly  or  val  litera- 

*Sir    William    Muir,    "Ancient  Arabic    Poetry,    its    Genuineness     ^^^' 
and  Authenticity,"  in  Royal  Asiatic  Society's  Journal  (1882),  p.  30. 

337 


338 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      fore- 


Method  of 

presenting 

early 

Christian 

thought. 


in  detail.  Indeed,  the  predilection  of  the  humanists  of  the 
fifteenth  and  sixteenth  centuries  for  anything  written  in 
Greek  and  their  aversion  to  medieval  Latin  has  too  long 
operated  as  a  bar  to  the  study  of  medieval  literature  in  gen- 
eral. And  scholars  who  have  edited  or  studied  the  Greek, 
Syriac,  and  other  ancient  texts  connected  with  early  Chris- 
tianity have  perhaps  too  often  neglected  the  Latin  versions 
preserved  in  medieval  manuscripts,  or,  while  treasuring  up 
every  hint  that  Photius  lets  fall,  have  failed  to  note  the  cita- 
tions and  allusions  in  medieval  Latin  encyclopedists.  Yet  it 
is  often  the  case  that  the  manuscripts  containing  the  Latin 
versions  are  of  earlier  date  than  those  which  seem  to  pre- 
serve the  Greek  original  text. 

There  is  so  much  repetition  and  resemblance  between  the 
numerous  Christian  writers  in  Greek  and  Latin  of  the  Ro- 
man Empire  that  I  have  even  less  than  in  the  case  of  their 
classical  contemporaries  attempted  a  complete  presentation 
of  them,  but,  while  not  intending  to  omit  any  account  of  the 
first  importance  in  the  history  of  magic  or  experimental  sci- 
ence, have  aimed  to  make  a  selection  of  representative  per- 
sons and  typical  passages.  At  the  same  time,  in  the  case 
of  those  authors  and  works  which  are  discussed,  the  aim  is 
to  present  their  thought  in  sufficiently  specific  detail  to 
enable  the  reader  to  estimate  for  himself  their  scientific  or 
superstitious  character  and  their  relations  to  classical  thought 
on  the  one  hand  and  medieval  thought  on  the  other. 

Before  we  treat  of  Christian  writings  themselves  it  is 
essential  to  notice  some  related  lines  of  thought  and  groups 
of  writings  which  either  preceded  or  accompanied  the  devel- 
opment of  Christian  thought  and  literature,  and  which  either 
influenced  even  orthodox  thought  powerfully,  or  illustrate 
foreign  elements,  aberrations,  side-currents,  and  undertows 
which  none  the  less  cannot  be  disregarded  in  tracing  the 
main  current  of  Christian  belief.  We  therefore  shall  suc- 
cessively treat  of  the  literature  extant  under  the  name  of 
Enoch,  of  the  works  of  Philo  Judaeus,  of  the  doctrines  of 
the  Gnostics,  of  the  Christian  Apocrypha,  of  the  Pseudo- 


WORD  BOOK  II,  FOREWORD  339 

Clementines  and  Simon  Magus,  and  of  the  Confession  of 
Cyprian  and  some  similar  stories.  We  shall  then  make 
Origen's  Reply  to  Celsus,  in  which  the  conflict  of  classical 
and  Christian  conceptions  is  well  illustrated,  our  point  of 
departure  in  an  examination  of  the  attitude  of  the  early 
fathers  towards  magic  and  science.  Succeeding  chapters  will 
treat  of  the  attitude  toward  magic  of  other  fathers  before 
Augustine,  of  Christianity  and  natural  science  as  shown  in 
Basil's  Hexaemeron,  Epiphanius'  Panarion,  and  the  Physio- 
logus,  and  of  Augustine  himself.  A  final  chapter  on  the 
fusion  of  paganism  and  Christianity  in  the  fourth  and  fifth 
centuries  will  terminate  this  second  division  of  our  investi- 
gation and  also  serve  as  a  supplement  to  the  preceding  divi- 
sion and  an  introduction  to  the  third  book  on  the  early  mid- 
dle ages.  Our  arrangement  is  thus  in  part  topical  rather 
than  strictly  chronological.  The  dates  of  many  authors  and 
works  are  too  dubious,  there  is  too  much  of  the  apocryphal 
and  interpolated,  and  we  have  to  rely  too  much  upon  later 
writers  for  the  views  of  earlier  ones,  to  make  a  strictly  or 
even  primarily  chronological  arrangement  either  advisable 
or  feasible. 


CHAPTER  XIII 


THE  BOOK  OF  ENOCH 


Enoch's 

reputation 

as  an 

astrologer 

in  the 

middle 

ages. 


Enoch's  reputation  as  an  astrologer  in  the  middle  ages — Date  and 
influence  of  the  literature  ascribed  to  Enoch — Angels  governing  the 
universe ;  stars  and  angels — The  fallen  angels  teach  men  magic  and 
other  arts — The  stars  as  sinners — Effect  of  sin  upon  nature — Celestial 
phenomena — Mountains  and  metals — Strange  animals. 

In  collections  of  medieval  manuscripts  there  often  is  found 
a  treatise  on  fifteen  stars,  fifteen  herbs,  fifteen  stones,  and 
fifteen  figures  engraved  upon  them,  which  is  attributed  some- 
times to  Hermes,  presumably  Trismegistus,  and  sometimes 
to  Enoch,  the  patriarch,  who  "walked  with  God  and  was 
not."^  Indeed  in  the  prologue  to  a  Hermetic  work  on  astrol- 
ogy in  a  medieval  manuscript  we  are  told  that  Enoch  and  the 
first  of  the  three  Hermeses  or  Mercuries  are  identical.^  This 


*  Ascribed  to  Enoch  in  Harleian 
MS  1612,  fol.  I5r,  Incipit: 
"Enoch  tanquam  unus  ex  phi- 
losophis  super  res  quartum  librum 
edidit,  in  quo  voluit  determinare 
ista  quatuor :  videlicet  de  xv 
stellis,  de  xv  herbis,  de  xv  lapidi- 
bus  preciosis  et  de  xv  figuris 
ipsis  lapidibus  sculpendis,"  and 
Wolfenbiittel  2725,  14th  century, 
fols.  83-94V;  BN  13014,  14th  cen- 
tury, fol.  174V;  Amplon,  Quarto 
381  (Erfurt),  14th  century,  fols. 
42-45 :  for  "Enoch's  prayer"  see 
Sloane  MS  3821,  17th  century, 
fols.    190V-193. 

Ascribed  to  Hermes  in  Harleian 
80,  Sloane  3847,  Royal  12-C- 
XVni;  Berlin  963,  fol.  105; 
Vienna  5216,  15th  century,  fols. 
63r-66v;  "Dixit  Enoch  quod  15 
sunt  stelle  /  ex  tractatu  Here- 
meth  (i-  e.  Hermes)  et  enoch 
compilatum" ;  and  in  the  Cata- 
logue of  Amplonius  (1412  A.D.), 
Math.  53.    See  below,  H,  220-21. 


The  stars  are  probably  fifteen  in 
number  because  Ptolemy  distin- 
guished that  many  stars  of  first 
magnitude.  Dante,  Paradiso,  XHI, 
4,  also  speaks  of  "quindici  stelle." 
See  Orr  (1913),  pp.  154-6,  where 
Ptolemy's  descriptions  of  the  fif- 
teen stars  of  first  magnitude  and 
their  modern  names  are  given. 

*Digby  67,  late  12th  century, 
fol.  69r,  "Prologus  de  tribiis 
Mercuriis."  They  are  also  identi- 
fied by  other  medieval  writers. 
Some  would  further  identify 
with  Enoch  Nannacus  or  Anna- 
cus,  king  of  Phrygia,  who  fore- 
saw Deucalion's  flood  and  la- 
mented. See  J.  G.  Frazer  (1918), 
I,  155-6,  and  P.  Buttmann,  Myth- 
ologus,  Berlin,  1828- 1829,  and  E. 
Babelon,  La  tradition  phrygienne 
du  deluge,  in  Rev.  d.  I  hist.  d. 
religs.,  XXHI  (1891),  which  he 
cites. 

Roger  Bacon  stated  that  some 
would    identify   Enoch   with   "the 


340 


CHAP.    XIII 


THE  BOOK  OF  ENOCH 


341 


treatise  probably  has  no  direct  relation  to  the  Book  of 
Enoch,  which  we  shall  discuss  in  this  chapter  and  which 
was  composed  in  the  pre-Christian  period.  But  it  is  inter- 
esting to  observe  that  the  same  reputation  for  astrology, 
which  led  the  middle  ages  sometimes  to  ascribe  this  treatise 
to  Enoch,  is  likewise  found  in  "the  first  notice  of  a  book  of 
Enoch,"  which  "appears  to  be  due  to  a  Jewish  or  Samaritan 
Hellenist,"  which  "has  come  down  to  us  successively  through 
Alexander  Polyhistor  and  Eusebius,"  and  which  states  that 
Enoch  was  the  founder  of  astrology.^  The  statement  in 
Genesis  that  Enoch  lived  three  hundred  and  sixty-five  years 
would  also  lead  men  to  associate  him  with  the  solar  year 
and  stars. 

The  Book  of  Enoch  is  "the  precipitate  of  a  literature.   Date  and 
once  very  active,  which  revolved  .  .  .  round  Enoch,"  and   of  ^j^g 

in  the  form  which  has  come  down  to  us  is  a  patchwork  from   'iterature 

ascribed 
"several  originally  independent  books."  ^    It  is  extant  in  the   to  Enoch. 

form  of  Greek  fragments  preserved  in  the  Chronography  of 
G.  Syncellus,^  or  but  lately  discovered  in  (Upper)  Egypt, 
and  in  more  complete  but  also  more  recent  manuscripts  giv- 
ing an  Ethiopic  and  a  Slavonic  version.^  These  last  two 
versions  are  quite  different  both  in  language  and  content, 
while  some  of  the  citations  of  Enoch  in  ancient  writers 
apply  to  neither  of  these  versions.  While  "Ethiopic  did  not 
exist  as  a  literary  language  before  350  A.  D.,"  ^  and  none 


great  Hermogenes,  whom  the 
Greeks  much  commend  and  laud, 
and  they  ascribe  to  him  all  secret 
and  celestial  science."  Steele 
(1920)   99. 

'R.  H.  Charles,  The  Book  of 
Enoch,  Oxford,  1893,  p.  33,  citing 
Euseb.  Praep.  Evan.,  ix,  17,  8 
(Gaisford). 

*  Charles  (1893),  p.  10,  citing 
Ewald. 

*ed.  Dindorf,  1829. 

*  Lods,  Ad.  Le  Livre  d'Henoch, 
Fragments  grecs  decouverts  a 
Akhmin,  Paris,   1892. 

Charles,  R.  H.,  The  Book  of 
Enoch,  Oxford,  1893,  "translated 
from    Professor    Dillman's    Ethi- 


opic text,  amended  and  revised 
in  accordance  with  hitherto  uncol- 
lated  Ethiopic  manuscripts  and 
with  the  Gizeh  and  other  Greek 
and  Latin  fragments,  which  are 
here  published  in  full."  The  Book 
of  EnocJi,  translated  anezv,  etc., 
Oxford,  1912.  Also  translated  in 
Charles  (1913)  II,  163-281.  There 
are  twenty-nine  Ethiopic  MSS  of 
Enoch. 

Charles,  R.  H.,  and  Morfill,  W. 
R.,  The  Book  of  the  Secrets  of 
Enoch,  translated  from  the  Sla- 
vonic, Oxford,  1896.  Also  by 
Forbes  and  Charles  in  Charles 
(1913)   II.  425-69. 

"Charles    (1893),  p.  22. 


342  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

of  the  extant  manuscripts  of  the  Ethiopic  version  is  earlier 
than  the  fifteenth  century/  Charles  believes  that  they  are 
based  upon  a  Greek  translation  of  the  Hebrew  and  Aramaic 
original,  and  that  even  the  interpolations  in  this  were  made 
by  an  editor  living  before  the  Christian  era.  He  asserts  that 
**nearly  all  the  writers  of  the  New  Testament  were  familiar 
with  it,"  and  influenced  by  it, — in  fact  that  its  influence  on 
the  New  Testament  was  greater  than  that  of  all  the  other 
apocrypha  together,  and  that  it  "had  all  the  weight  of  a 
canonical  book"  with  the  early  church  fathers.^  After 
300  A.  D.,  however,  it  became  discredited,  except  as  we 
have  seen  among  Ethiopic  and  Slavonic  Christians.  Be- 
fore 300  Origen  in  his  Reply  to  Celsus  ^  accuses  his 
opponent  of  quoting  the  Book  of  Enoch  as  a  Christian  au- 
thority concerning  the  fallen  angels.  Origen  objects  that 
"the  books  which  bear  the  name  Enoch  do  not  at  all  circu- 
late in  the  Churches  as  divine."  Augustine,  in  the  City  of 
God,'^  written  between  413  and  426,  admits  that  Enoch  "left 
some  divine  writings,  for  this  is  asserted  by  the  Apostle 
Jude  in  his  canonical  epistle."  But  he  doubts  if  any  of  the 
writings  current  in  his  own  day  are  genuine  and  thinks  that 
they  have  been  wisely  excluded  from  the  course  of  Scripture. 
Lods  writes  that  after  the  ninth  century  in  the  east  and  from 
a  much  earlier  date  in  the  west,  the  Book  of  Enoch  is  not 
mentioned,  "At  the  most  some  medieval  rabbis  seem  still 
to  know  of  it."  ^  Yet  Alexander  Neckam,  in  the  twelfth 
century,  speaks  as  if  Latin  Christendom  of  that  date  had 
some  acquaintance  with  the  Enoch  literature.  We  shall  note 
some  passages  in  Saint  Hildegard  which  seem  parallel  to 
others  in  the  Book  of  Enoch,  while  Vincent  of  Beauvais  in 
his  Speculum  naturale  in  the  thirteenth  century,  in  justify- 
ing a  certain  discriminating  use  of  the  apocryphal  books, 
points  out  that  Jude  quotes  Enoch  whose  book  is  now  called 
apocryphal.^ 

'Charles  (1913),  II,  165-6.  "Introd.,  vi. 

'  Charles  (1893),  pp.  2  and  41-  "Spec.  Nat.,  I,  g.    A  Latin  frag- 

•  v.,  54.  ment,  found  in  the  British  Museum 

*  XV,  23.  in  1893  by  Dr.  M.  R.  James  and 


XIII  THE  BOOK  OF  ENOCH  343 

The  Enoch  literature  has  much  to  say  concerning  angels,   Angels 
and  implies  their  control  of  nature,  man,  and  the  future.   fhJ^uni"^ 
We  hear  of  Raphael,  "who  is  set  over  all  the  diseases  and  verse: 
wounds  of  the  children  of  men";  Gabriel,  "who  is  set  over  angels, 
all  the  powers"  ;  Phanuel,  "who  is  set  over  the  repentance  and 
hope  of  those  who  inherit  eternal  life."  ^     The  revolution 
of  the  stars  is  described  as  "according  to  the  number  of 
the  angels,"  and  in  the  Slavonic  version  the  number  of  those 
angels  is  stated  as  two  hundred.^     Indeed  the  stars  them- 
selves are  often  personified  and  we  read  "how  they  keep  faith 
with  each  other"  and  even  of  "all  the  stars  whose  privy 
members  are  like  those  of  horses."  ^     The  Ethiopic  version 
also  speaks  of  the  angels  or  spirits  of  hoar-frost,  dew,  hail, 
snow  and  so  forth.*     In  the  Slavonic  version  Enoch  finds 
in  the  sixth  heaven  the  angels  who  attend  to  the  phases  of 
the  moon  and  the  revolutions  of  stars  and  sun  and  who 
superintend  the  good  or  evil  condition  of  the  world.     He 
finds  angels  set  over  the  years  and  seasons,  the  rivers  and 
sea,  the  fruits  of  the  earth,  and  even  an  angel  over  every 
herb.^ 

The  fallen  angels  in  particular  are  mentioned  in  the  Book  The  fallen 

of  Enoch.    Two  hundred  angels   lusted  after  the  comely  f"^?|^ 
•'  o  J    teach  men 

daughters  of  men  and  bound  themselves  by  oaths  to  marry  magic  and 
them.^  After  having  thus  taken  unto  themselves  wives,  they 
instructed  the  human  race  in  the  art  of  magic  and  the  science 
of  botany — or  to  be  more  exact,  "charms  and  enchantments" 
and  "the  cutting  of  roots  and  of  woods."  In  another  chap- 
ter various  individual  angels  are  named  who  taught  respec- 
tively the  enchanters  and  botanists,  the  breaking  of  charms, 
astrology,  and  various  branches  thereof."^  In  the  Greek  frag- 
ment preserved  by  Syncellus  there  are  further  mentioned 
pharmacy,  and  what  probably  denote  geomancy   ("sign  of 

published  in  the  Cambridge  Texts  ^  Book   of   Enoch,   XLIII;    XC, 

and    Studies,    II,     3,     Apocrypha  21. 

Anecdota,    pp.    146-50,    "seems    to  *  Ibid.,  LX,   17-18. 

point    to    a    Latin    translation    of  ^Secrets  of  Enoch,  XIX. 

Enoch"— Charles  (1913)  H,  167.  'Caps.  VI-XI  in  both  Lods  and 

^  Book  of  Enoch,  XL,  9.  Charles. 

* Ibid.,y.U.ll;  Secrets  of  Enoch.  'Book    of   Enoch,    VIII,    3,    in 

IV.  both  Charles  and  Lods. 


344  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

the  earth")  and  aeromancy  {aeroskopia).  Through  this 
revelation  of  mysteries  which  should  have  been  kept  hid  we 
are  told  that  men  "know  all  the  secrets  of  the  angels,  and 
all  the  violence  of  the  Satans,  and  all  their  occult  power,  and 
all  the  power  of  those  who  practice  sorcery,  and  the  power 
of  witchcraft,  and  the  power  of  those  who  make  molten 
images  for  the  whole  earth."  ^  The  revelation  included, 
moreover,  not  only  magic  arts,  witchcraft,  divination,  and 
astrology,  but  also  natural  sciences,  such  as  botany  and 
pharmacy — which,  however,  are  apparently  regarded  as 
closely  akin  to  magic — and  useful  arts  such  as  mining  metals, 
manufacturing  armor  and  weapons,  and  "writing  with  ink 
and  paper" — "and  thereby  many  sinned  from  eternity  to 
eternity  and  until  this  day."  ^  As  the  preceding  remark  in- 
dicates, the  author  is  decidedly  of  the  opinion  that  men 
were  not  created  to  the  end  that  they  should  write  with  pen 
and  ink.  "For  man  was  created  exactly  like  the  angels 
to  the  intent  that  he  should  continue  righteous  and  pure, 
.  .  .  but  through  this  their  knowledge  men  are  perishing."  ^ 
Perhaps  the  writer  means  to  censure  writing  as  magical  and 
thinks  of  it  only  as  mystic  signs  and  characters.  Magic  is 
always  regarded  as  evil  in  the  Enoch  literature,  and  witch- 
craft, enchantments,  and  "devilish  magic"  are  given  a  promi- 
nent place  in  a  list  in  the  Slavonic  version  ^  of  evil  deeds 
done  upon  earth. 

In  connection  with  the  fallen  angels  we  find  the  stars 
regarded  as  capable  of  sin  as  well  as  personified.  In  the 
Ethiopic  version  there  is  more  than  one  mention  of  seven 
stars  that  transgressed  the  command  of  God  and  are  bound 
against  the  day  of  judgment  or  for  the  space  of  ten  thou- 
sand years. ^  One  passage  tells  how  "judgment  was  held 
first  over  the  stars,  and  they  were  judged  and  found  guilty, 
and  went  to  the  place  of  condemnation,  and  they  were  cast 
into  an  abyss."  ^  A  similar  identification  of  the  stars  with 
the  fallen  angels  is  found  in  one  of  the  visions  of  Saint 

"■Book   of  Enoch,   LXV,   6.  *  Secrets  of  Enoch,  X. 

'Ibid.,  LXV,  7-8;  LXIX,  6-9.  ^ Book  of  Enoch,  XVIII,  XXL 

*Ibid.,  LXIX,   lo-ii.  "Ibid.,   XC,    24. 


xiii  THE  BOOK  OF  ENOCH  345 

Hildegard  in  the  twelfth  century.  She  writes,  "I  saw  a 
great  star  most  splendid  and  beautiful,  and  with  it  an  ex- 
ceeding multitude  of  falling  sparks  which  with  the  star 
followed  southward.  And  they  examined  Him  upon  His 
throne  almost  as  something  hostile,  and  turning  from  Him, 
they  sought  rather  the  north.  And  suddenly  they  were  all 
annihilated,  being  turned  into  black  coals  .  .  .  and  cast  into 
the  abyss  that  I  could  see  them  no  more."  ^  She  then  in- 
terprets the  vision  as  signifying  the  fall  of  the  angels. 

An  idea  which  we  shall  find  a  number  of  times  in  other  Effect  of 
ancient  and  medieval  writers  appears  also  in  the  Book  of  nature. 
Enoch.  It  is  that  human  sin  upsets  the  world  of  nature, 
and  in  this  particular  case,  even  the  period  of  the  moon  and 
the  orbits  of  the  stars."  Hildegard  again  roughly  parallels 
the  Enoch  literature  by  holding  that  the  original  harmony 
of  the  four  elements  upon  this  earth  was  changed  into  a 
confused  and  disorderly  mixture  after  the  fall  of  man.^ 

The  natural  world,  although  intimately  associated  with  Celestial 
the  spiritual  world  and  hardly  distinguished  from  it  in  the  phenomena 
Enoch  literature,  receives  considerable  attention,  and  much 
of  the  discussion  in  both  the  Ethiopic  and  Slavonic  versions 
is  of  a  scientific  rather  than  ethical  or  apocalyptic  character. 
One  section  of  the  Ethiopic  version  is  described  by  Charles  * 
as  the  Book  of  Celestial  Physics  and  upholds  a  calendar 
based  upon  the  lunar  year.  The  Slavonic  version,  on  the 
other  hand,  while  mentioning  the  lunar  year  of  354  days 
and  the  solar  year  of  365  and  ^  days,  seems  to  prefer 
the  latter,  since  the  years  of  Enoch's  life  are  given  as 
365,  and  he  writes  366  books  concerning  what  he  has  seen 
in  his  visions  and  voyages.^  The  Book  of  Enoch  supposes 
a  plurality  of  heavens.*'     In  the  Slavonic  version  Enoch  is 

*  Singer's  translation.  Studies  "  See  Morfill-Charles,  pp.  xxxiv- 
in  the  History  and  Method  of  xxxv,  for  mention  of  three  and 
Science,  Vol.  I,  p.  53,  of  Scivias,  seven  heavens  in  the  apocryphal 
III,  I,  in  Migne,  PL,  197,  565.  See  Testaments  of  the  Twelve  Patri- 
also  the  Koran  XV,  18.  archs,    "written    about    or    before 

^  Charles,  p.  32  and  cap.  LXXX.  the    beginning    of    the    Christian 

*  Singer,  25-26.  era,"  and  for  "the  probability  of 
*Pp.  187-219.  an  Old  Testament  belief  in  the 
^Secrets  of  Enoch,  I  and  XXX.  plurality  of  the  heavens."    For  the 


346 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Mountains 

and 

metals. 


taken  through  the  seven  heavens,  or  ten  heavens  in  one  manu- 
script, with  the  signs  of  the  zodiac  in  the  eighth  and  ninth. 
An  account  is  also  given  of  the  creation,  and  the  waters  above 
the  firmament,  which  were  to  give  the  early  Christian  apolo- 
gists and  medieval  clerical  scientists  so  much  difficulty,  are 
described  as  follows :  "And  thus  I  made  firm  the  waters, 
that  is,  the  depths,  and  I  surrounded  the  waters  with  light, 
and  I  created  seven  circles,  and  I  fashioned  them  like 
crystal,  moist  and  dry,  that  is  to  say,  like  glass  and  ice,  and 
as  for  the  waters  and  also  the  other  elements  I  showed  each 
of  them  their  paths,  (viz.)  to  the  seven  stars,  each  of  them 
in  their  heaven,  how  they  should  go."  ^  The  order  of  the 
seven  planets  in  their  circles  is  given  as  follows:  in  the  first 
and  highest  circle  the  star  Kruno,  then  Aphrodite  or  Venus, 
Ares  (Mars),  the  sun,  Zeus  (Jupiter),  Hermes  (Mercury), 
and  the  moon.^  God  also  tells  Enoch  that  the  duration  of 
the  world  will  be  for  a  week  of  years,  that  is,  seven  thousand, 
after  which  "let  there  be  at  the  beginning  of  the  eighth 
thousand  a  time  when  there  is  no  computation  and  no  end ; 
neither  years  nor  months  nor  weeks  nor  days  nor  hours."  ^ 
Turning  from  celestial  physics  to  terrestrial  phenomena, 
we  may  note  a  few  allusions  to  minerals,  vegetation,  and 
-animals.  "Seven  mountains  of  magnificent  stones"  are 
more  than  once  mentioned  in  the  Ethiopic  version  and  are 
described  as  each  different  from  the  other.*  Another  pas- 
sage speaks  of  "seven  mountains  full  of  choice  nard  and 
aromatic  trees  and  cinnamon  and  pepper."  °     But  whether 


seven  heavens  in  the  apocryphal 
Ascension  of  Isaiah  see  Charles' 
edition  of  that  virork  (igoo),  xlix. 
^Secrets  of  Enoch,  XXVII. 
Charles  prefaces  this  passage  by 
the  remark,  "I  do  not  pretend  to 
understand  what  follows" :  but  it 
seems  clear  that  the  waters  above 
the  firmament  are  referred  to  from 
what  the  author  goes  on  to  say, 
"And  thus  I  made  firm  the  circles 
of  the  heavens,  and  caused  the 
waters  below  which  are  under  the 
heavens  to  be  gathered  into  one 
place."     It  would  also   seem  that 


each  of  the  seven  planets  is  rep- 
resented as  moving  in  a  sphere  of 
crystal.  In  the  Ethiopic  version, 
LIV,  8,  we  are  told  that  the  water 
above  the  heavens  is  masculine, 
and  that  the  water  beneath  the 
earth  is  feminine ;  also  LX,  7-8, 
that  Leviathan  is  female  and 
Behemoth  male. 

'Secrets  of  Enoch,  XXX. 

^  Ibid.,  45-46,  see  also  the  Ethi- 
opic Book  of  Enoch,  XCIII,  for 
"seven  weeks." 

*Book  of  Enoch,  XVIII,  XXIV. 

''Ibid.,   XXXII. 


XIII  THE  BOOK  OF  ENOCH  347 

these  groups  of  seven  mountains  are  to  be  astrologically 
related  to  the  seven  planets  is  not  definitely  stated.  We  are 
also  left  in  doubt  whether  the  following  passage  may  have 
some  astrological  or  even  alchemical  significance,  or  whether 
it  is  merely  a  figurative  prophecy  like  that  in  the  Book  of 
Daniel  concerning  the  image  seen  by  Nebuchadnezzar  in  his 
dream.  "There  mine  eyes  saw  all  the  hidden  things  of 
heaven  that  shall  be,  an  iron  mountain,  and  one  of  copper, 
and  one  of  silver,  and  one  of  gold,  and  one  of  soft  metal,  and 
one  of  lead."  ^  At  any  rate  Enoch  has  come  very  near  to 
listing  the  seven  metals  usually  associated  with  the  seven 
planets.  In  another  passage  we  are  informed  that  while 
silver  and  "soft  metal"  come  from  the  earth,  lead  and  tin 
are  produced  by  a  fountain  in  which  an  eminent  angel 
stands.^ 

As  for  animals  we  are  informed  that  Behemoth  is  male  Strange 
and  Leviathan  female.^  When  Enoch  went  to  the  ends  of 
the  earth  he  saw  there  great  beasts  and  birds  who  differed 
in  appearance,  beauty,  and  voice.*  In  the  Slavonic  version 
we  hear  a  good  deal  of  phoenixes  and  chalky dri,  who  seem 
to  be  flying  dragons.  These  creatures  are  described  as 
"strange  in  appearance  with  the  feet  and  tails  of  lions  and 
the  heads  of  crocodiles.  Their  appearance  was  of  a  purple 
color  like  the  rainbow;  their  size,  nine  hundred  measures. 
Their  wings  were  like  those  of  angels,  each  with  twelve, 
and  they  attend  the  chariot  of  the  sun,  and  go  with  him, 
bringing  heat  and  dew  as  they  are  ordered  by  God."  ^ 

"■Book  of  Enoch,  LII,  2.  *  Ibid.,  XXXIII. 

^Ibid.,  LXV,  7-8.  "Secrets    of    Enoch,    XII,    XV, 

'Ibid.,  LX,  7.  XIX. 


CHAPTER  XIV 


PHILO   JUDAEUS 


Bibliographical  note — Philo  the  mediator  between  Hellenistic  and 
Jewish-Christian  thought — His  influence  upon  the  middle  ages  was 
indirect — Good  and  bad  magic — Stars  not  gods  nor  first  causes — But 
rational  and  virtuous  animals,  and  God's  viceroys  over  inferiors — 
They  do  not  cause  evil;  but  it  is  possible  to  predict  the  future  from 
their  motions — Jewish  astrology — Perfection  of  the  number  seven — 
And  of  fifty — Also  of  four  and  six — Spirits  of  the  air — Interpretation 
of  dreams — Politics  are  akin  to  magic — A  thought  repeated  by  Moses 
Maimonides  and  Albertus  Magnus. 

^'But  since  every  city  in  which  laws  are  properly  estab- 
lished has  a  regular  constitution,  it  became  necessary  for 
this  citizen  of  the  world  to  adopt  the  same  constitution  as 
that  which  prevailed  in  the  universal  world.  And  this  con- 
stitution is  the  right  reason  of  nature." 

— On  Creation,  cap.  50. 

There  probably  Is  no  other  man  who  marks  so  well  the 
fusion  of  Hellenic  and  Hebrew  ideas  and  the  transition 
from  them  to  Christian  thought  as  Philo  Judaeus.^  He 
flourished  at  Alexandria  in  the  first  years  of  our  era — 
the  exact  dates  both  of  his  birth  and  of  his  death  are  un- 
certain— and  speaks  of  himself  as  an  old  man  at  the  time  of 


*  The  literature  dealing  in  gen- 
eral with  Philo  and  his  philosophy 
is  too  extensive  to  indicate  here, 
while  there  has  been  no  study 
primarily  devoted  to  our  interest 
in  him.  It  may  be  useful  to  note, 
however,  the  most  recent  editions 
of  his  works  and  studies  concern- 
ing him,  from  which  the  reader 
can  learn  of  earlier  researches. 
See  also  Leopold  Cohn,  The 
Latest  Researches  on  Philo  of 
Alexandria  (Reprinted  from  The 
Jewish   Quarterly  Review),   Lon- 


don, 1892.  The  most  recent  edi- 
tion of  the  Greek  text  of  Philo's 
works  is  by  L.  Cohn  and  P.  Wend- 
land,  Philonis  Alexandrini  opera 
quae  supcrsunt,  Berlin,  1896-1915, 
in  six  vols.  The  earlier  edition 
was  by  Mangey.  Recent  editions 
of  single  works  are :  F.  C.  Cony- 
beare,  Philo  about  the  Contempla- 
tive Life,  critically  edited  with  a 
defence  of  its  genuineness,  1895. 
E.  Brehier,  Commentaire  alle- 
gorique  des  Saintes  Lois  apres 
l'a:uvre  des  six  jours,  Greek  and 


348 


CHAP.    XIV 


PHILO  JUDAEUS 


349 


his  participation  in  the  embassy  of  Jews  to  the  Emperor 
Gaius  or  CaHguIa  in  40  A.  D.  He  repeats  the  doctrines 
of  the  Greek  philosophers  and  anticipates  much  that  the 
church  fathers  discuss.  Before  the  Neo-Platonists  he  re- 
gards matter  as  the  source  of  all  evil  and  feels  the  necessity 
of  mediators,  angels  or  demons,  between  God  and  man. 
Before  the  medieval  revival  of  Aristotle  and  natural  phi- 
losophy he  tries  to  reconcile  the  Mosaic  account  of  creation 
with  belief  in  a  world  soul,  and  monotheism  with  astrology. 
Before  the  rise  of  Christian  monasticism  he  describes  in  his 
treatise  On  the  Contemplative  Life  an  ascetic  community 
of  Therapeutae  at  Lake  Maerotis.^  After  Pythagoras  he 
enlarges  upon  the  mystic  significance  of  numbers.  After 
Plato  he  repeats  the  conception  of  an  ideal  city  of  God 


French,  1909.  In  the  passages 
from  Philo  quoted  in  this  chapter 
I  have  often  availed  myself  of  the 
wording  of  the  English  translation 
by  C.  D.  Yonge  in  four  vols., 
1854-1855.  The  Latin  translation 
of  Philo's  works  made  from  the 
Greek  by  Lilius  Tifernates  for 
Popes  Sixtus  IV  and  Innocent 
VIII  is  preserved  at  the  Vatican 
in  a  series  of  six  MSS  written 
during  the  years  1479-1484:  Vatic. 
Lat.,  180-185. 

J.  d'Alma,  Philon  d'Alexandrie  et 

le    quatricme    Evangile,    1910. 

N.     Bentwich,     Philo-Judaeus     of 

Alexandria,     1910     (a     small 

general  book). 

T.  H.  Billings,  The  Platonism  of 

Philo  Judaeiis,  1919. 
W.    Bousset,    JUdisch-Christlicher 
Schulbetrieb     in     Alexandria 
und  Rom,  1915. 
E.  Brehier,     Les     I  dees     philo  so- 
phiques      et      religieuscs      de 
Philon    dAlexandrie,    1908,    a 
scholarly    work    with    a    ten- 
page  bibliography. 
M.  Caraccio,  Filone  dAlessa'ndria 
e   le  sue   opere,   191 1,  a  brief 
indication   of   the  contents  of 
each  work. 
K.    S.    Guthrie,    The   Message    of 
Philo  Judaeus,   1910,  popular. 
H.   Guyot,   Les  Reminiscences  de 
Philon  le  Juif  che::  Plotin,  1906. 
P.    Heinsch,  Der  EinHuss  Philos 


auf     die     dlteste      christliche 
Exegese,  1908,  296  pp. 
H.  A.  A.  Kennedy,  Philo's  contri- 
bution to  Religion,  1919. 
J.    Martin,    Philon,    1907,    with    a 

five-page  bibliography. 
L.    H.    Mills,    Zarathustra,   Philo, 
the   Achaemenids   and   Israel, 
190S,  460  pp. 
L.    Treitel,    Philonische    Studicn, 

1915,  is  of  limited  scope. 
H.  Windisch,  Die  Frommigkeit 
Philos  u>id  ihrc  Bcdeutung 
filr  das  Christcntutn,  1909. 
*  The  genuineness  of  this  trea- 
tise, denied  by  Graetz  and  Lucius 
in  the  mid-nineteenth  century,  was 
amply  demonstrated  by  L.  Mas- 
sebieau,  Revue  de  I'Histoire  des 
Religions,  XVI  (1887),  170-98, 
284-319;  Conybeare,  Philo  about 
the  Contemplative  Life,  Oxford, 
1895 ;  and  P.  Wendland,  Die 
Thcrapeuten  und  die  Philonische 
Schrift  vom  Bcschaulichen  Leben, 
in  Jahrb.  f.  Class.  Philologie, 
Band  22  (1896),  693-770.  In  St. 
John's  College  Library,  Oxford, 
in  a  manuscript  of  the  early 
eleventh  century  (MS  128,  fol. 
215  fif)  with  Dionysius  the 
Areopagite  on  the  ecclesiastical 
hierarchy,  is,  Philonis  de  excir- 
cumcisione  credentibus  in  Aegyp- 
to  Christianis  simul  et  monachis 
ex  suprascripto  ab  eo  sermone  de 
vita  theorica  aut  de  orantibus. 


350  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

which  was  to  gain  such  a  hold  upon  Christian  imagination.^ 
After  the  Stoics  he  proclaims  the  doctrine  of  the  law  of 
nature,  holds  that  the  institution  of  human  slavery  is  abso- 
lutely contrary  to  it,  and  writes  "a  treatise  to  prove  that 
every  virtuous  man  is  free"  and  that  to  be  virtuous  is  to 
live  in  conformity  to  nature.^  He  had  previously  written 
another  treatise  designed  to  show  that  "every  wicked  man 
"was  a  slave,"  ^  and  he  held  a  theory  which  we  met  in  the 
Enoch  literature  and  shall  meet  again  in  a  number  of  subse- 
quent writers  that  sin  was  punished  naturally  by  forces  of 
nature  such  as  floods  and  thunderbolts.  He  did  not  orig- 
inate the  practice  of  allegorical  interpretation  of  the  Bible 
but  he  is  our  first  great  extant  example  thereof.  He  even 
went  so  far  as  to  regard  the  tree  of  life  and  the  story  of 
the  serpent  tempting  Eve  as  purely  symbolical,  an  attitude 
which  found  little  favor  with  Christian  writers.*  His 
effort  by  means  of  the  allegorical  method  to  find  in  the  books 
of  the  Pentateuch  all  the  attractive  concepts  and  theories 
which  he  had  learned  from  the  Greeks  became  later  in  the 
Christian  apologists  an  assertion  that  Plato  and  Pythagoras 
had  borrowed  their  doctrines  from  Abraham  and  Moses. 
His  doctrine  of  the  logos  had  a  powerful  influence  upon  the 
writers  of  the  New  Testament  and  the  theology  of  the  early 
church,^  Yet  Philo  afflrms  that  no  more  perfect  good  than 
philosophy  exists  in  human  life  and  in  both  literary  style 
and  erudition  he  is  a  Hellene  to  his  very  finger  tips.  The 
recent  tendency,  seen  especially  in  German  scholarship,  to 
deny  the  writers  of  the  Roman  Empire  any  capacity  for 
original  thought  and  to  trace  back  their  ideas  to  unextant 
authors  of  a  supposedly  much  more  productive  Hellenistic 
age  has  perhaps  been  carried  too  far.  But  if  we  may  not 
regard  Philo  as  a  great  originator,  and  it  is  evident  that 
he  borrowed  many  of  his  ideas,  he  was  at  any  rate  a  great 

^  De    mundi    opificio,    caps.    49  is  not  extant, 

and  50.  *  De    mundi    opiAcio,    caps.    54 

'  On     the     Contemplative    Life,  and  55. 

Chapter  9.  "  Reville,    J.,    Le    logos,   d'apres 

*  So    he    states    in    the    opening  Philon  d'Alexandrie,  Geneve,  1877. 
ientences  of  the  other  treatise;  it 


XIV  PHILO  JUDAEUS  351 

transmitter  of  thought,  a  mediator  after  his  own  heart  be- 
tween Jews  and  Greeks,  and  between  them  both  and  the 
Christian  writers  to  come.  Standing  at  the  close  of  the 
Hellenistic  age  and  at  the  opening  of  the  Roman  period,  he 
occupies  in  the  history  of  speculative  and  theological  thought 
an  analogous  position  to  that  of  Pliny  the  Elder  in  the  his- 
tory of  natural  science,  gathering  up  the  lore  of  the  past, 
perhaps  improving  it  with  some  additions  of  his  own,  and 
exercising  a  profound  influence  upon  the  age  to  come. 

Philo's  medieval  influence,  however,  was  probably  more  His  influ- 
indirect  than  Pliny's  and  passed  itself  on  through  yet  other  the  niiddle 
mediators  to  the  more  remote  times.  Comparatively  speak-  ages  was 
ing,  the  Natural  History  of  Pliny  probably  was  more  impor- 
tant in  the  middle  ages  than  in  the  early  Roman  Empire 
when  other  authorities  prevailed  in  the  Greek-speaking 
world.  Philo's  influence  on  the  other  hand  must  soon  be 
transmitted  through  Christian,  and  then  again  through  Latin, 
mediums.  This  is  indicated  by  the  fact  that  to-day  many 
of  his  works  are  wholly  lost  or  extant  only  in  fragments  ^ 
or  in  Armenian  versions,^  and  that  we  have  no  sure  infor- 
mation as  to  the  order  in  which  they  were  composed.^  But 
his  initial  force  is  none  the  less  of  the  greatest  moment,  and 
seems  amply  sufficient  to  justify  us  in  selecting  his  writings 
as  one  of  our  starting  points.  The  extent  to  which  one  is 
apt  to  find  in  the  writings  of  Philo  passages  which  are  fore- 
runners of  the  statements  of  subsequent  writers,  may  be 
illustrated  by  the  familiar  story  of  King  Canute  and  the 
tide.  Philo  in  his  work  On  Dreams  ■*  speaks  of  the  custom 
of  the  Germans  of  charging  the  incoming  tide  with  their 
drawn  swords.     But  what  especially  concern  us  are  Philo's 

*  Lincoln  College,  Oxford,  has  a  perfect   Latin  version,   is   not  re- 

I2th  century  MS  in  Greek  of  the  garded    as    a   genuine    work, — see 

De  vita  Mosis  and  De  virtutibus,  W.    O.    E.    Oesterley    and    G.    H. 

— MS  34.  Box,    The   Biblical  Antiquities  of 

'The  Alexander  sive  de  animali-  Philo,    now   first   translated    from 

bus  and  the  complete  text  of  the  the   old    Latin   version   by   M.    R. 

De     providentia     exist     only     in  James   (1917),  p.  7. 

Armenian    translation, — see    Cohn  '  Cohn  (1892),  11. 

(1892),   p.    16.     The  Biblical  An-  *ll,  17. 
tiquities,   extant    only    in   an   im- 


352  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

statements  concerning  magic,  astrology,  the  stars,  the  per- 
fection and  power  of  numbers,  demons,  and  the  interpreta- 
tion of  dreams. 

Philo  draws  a  distinction  between  magic  in  the  good  and 
bad  sense.  The  former  and  true  magical  art  is  the  lore  of 
learned  Persians  called  Magi  who  investigate  nature  more 
minutely  and  deeply  than  is  usual  and  explain  divine  virtues 
clearly.^  The  latter  magic  is  a  spurious  imitation  of  the 
other,  practised  by  quacks  and  impostors,  old-wives  and 
slaves,  who  by  means  of  incantations  and  the  like  procedure 
profess  to  change  men  from  love  to  hatred  or  vice  versa 
and  who  "deceive  unsuspecting  persons  and  waste  whole 
families  away  by  degrees  and  without  making  any  noise." 
It  is  to  this  adulterated  and  evil  magic  that  Philo  again 
refers  when  he  likens  political  life  to  Joseph's  coat  of  many 
colors,  stained  with  the  blood  of  wars,  and  in  which  a  very 
little  truth  is  mixed  up  with  a  great  deal  of  sophistry  akin 
to  that  of  the  augurs,  ventriloquists,  sorcerers,  jugglers  and 
enchanters,  "from  whose  treacherous  arts  it  is  very  difficult 
to  escape."  ^  This  distinction  between  a  magic  of  the  wise 
and  of  nature  and  that  of  vulgar  impostors  is  one  which 
we  shall  find  in  many  subsequent  writers,  although  it  was 
not  recognized  by  Pliny.  Philo  also  antecedes  numerous 
Christian  commentators  upon  the  Book  of  Numbers  ^  in 
considering  the  vexed  question  whether  Balaam  was  an  evil 
enchanter  and  diviner,  or  a  divine  prophet,  or  whether  he 
combined  magic  and  prophecy,  and  thus  indicated  that  the 
former  art  is  not  evil  but  has  divine  approval.  Philo's  con- 
clusion is  the  more  usual  one  that  Balaam  was  a  celebrated 
diviner  and  magician,  and  that  it  is  impossible  that  "holy 
inspiration  should  be  combined  with  magic,"  but  that  in  the 
particular  case  of  his  blessing  Israel  the  spirit  of  divine 

^  (Quod  omnis  probus  liber  sit,  a  number  of  other  passages  of  the 

cap.  xi)  ;  also  The  Law  Concern-  Bible:    Deut..  XXIII,  3-6;  Joshua, 

ing  Murderers,  cap.  4.  XIII,  22;  XXIV,  9-10;  Nehemiah, 

'On  Dreams,  I,  38.  XIII,   iflf;    Micah,  VI,   5;    Second 

*  Numbers      XXII-XXV.       Ba-  Peter,  II,  15-16;  Jude,  11 ;  Revela- 

laam  is,  of  course,  referred  to  in  tion,   II,    14. 


XIV  PHILO  JUDAEUS  353 

prophecy  took  possession  of  him  and  "drove  all  his  artificial 
system  of  cunning  divination  out  of  his  soul."  ^ 

Philo  has  considerably  more  to  say  upon  the  subject  of  stars  not 
astrology  than  upon  that  of  magic.  He  was  especially  con-  so^s  nor 
cerned  to  deny  that  the  stars  were  first  causes  or  independent  causes, 
gods.  He  chided  the  Chaldean  adepts  in  genethlialogy  for 
recognizing  no  other  god  than  the  universe  and  no  other 
causes  than  those  apparent  to  the  senses,  and  for  regarding 
fate  and  necessity  as  gods  and  the  periodical  revolutions  of 
the  heavenly  bodies  as  the  cause  of  all  good  and  evil."  Philo 
more  than  once  exhorts  the  reader  to  follow  Abraham's 
example  in  leaving  Chaldea  and  the  science  of  genethlialogy 
and  coming  to  Charran  to  a  comprehension  of  the  true  nature 
of  God.^  He  agreed  with  Moses  that  the  stars  should  not 
be  worshiped  and  that  they  had  been  created  by  God,  and 
more  than  that,  not  created  until  the  fourth  day,  in  order 
that  it  might  be  perfectly  clear  to  men  that  they  were  not 
the  primary  causes  of  things.* 

Philo,  nevertheless,  despite  his  attack  on  the  Chaldeans,  But 

believed  in  much  which  we  should  call  astrological.     The  national 

.  .    .        and  virtu- 

stars,  although  not  mdependent  gods,  are  nevertheless  divine  ous  ani- 

images  of  surpassing  beauty  and  possess  divine  natures,  al-  GocTs  vice- 
though  they  are  not  incorporeal  beings.  Philo  distinguishes  foys  over 
between  the  stars,  men,  and  other  animals  as  follows.  The 
beasts  are  capable  of  neither  virtue  nor  vice;  human  beings 
are  capable  of  both;  the  stars  are  intelligent  animals,  but 
incapable  of  any  evil  and  wholly  virtuous.^  They  were 
native-born  citizens  of  the  world  long  before  its  first  human 
citizen  had  been  naturalized.^    God,  moreover,  did  not  post- 

*  Vita  Mosis,   I,   48-50.     Besides       bus  and   Ilept   rov  deoTrkfiirTovs   elvai 
discussion    of    Balaam    in    various       rovs  ovfipovs. 

Biblical      commentaries,      diction-  ^  Ibid.,  Cap.  50.    Huet,  the  noted 

aries,  and  encyclopedias,  see  Heng-  French   scholar  of  the    17th  cen- 

stenberg,  Die   Geschichte  Bileams  tury,     states     in     his     edition     of 

und  seine  Weissagungen,  1842.  Origen  that  "Philo  after  his  cus- 

^De  migrat.  Abrahanii,  cap.  2^.  torn  repeats  an  opinion  of  Plato's 

^  Idem,  and  De  somiiiis,  cap.  10.  and    almost    his    very    words    for 

*  De  monarchia,  I,  i.    De  muiidi  ...  he  asserts  that  the  stars  are 
opiUcio,  cap.  14.  not    only    animals    but    also    the 

'^  De  mundi  opiUcio,  caps.  18,  50      purest     intellects."       Migne     PG, 
and  24.     See  also  his  De  giganti-      XVII,  col.  978. 


354 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


They  do 
not  cause 
evil :  but  it 
is  possible 
to  predict 
the  future 
from  their 
motions. 


Jewish 
astrology. 


pone  their  creation  until  the  fourth  day  because  superiors 
are  subject  to  inferiors.  On  the  contrary  they  are  the  vice- 
roys of  the  Father  of  all  and  in  the  vast  city  of  this  universe 
the  ruling  class  is  made  up  of  the  planets  and  fixed  stars, 
and  the  subject  class  consists  of  all  the  natures  beneath  the 
moon.^  A  relation  of  natural  sympathy  exists  between  the 
different  parts  of  the  universe,  and  all  things  upon  the  earth 
are  dependent  upon  the  stars. ^ 

Philo  of  course  will  not  admit  that  evil  is  caused  either 
by  the  virtuous  stars  or  by  God  working  through  them.  As 
has  been  said,  he  attributed  evil  to  matter  or  to  "the  natural 
changes  of  the  elements,"  ^  drawing  a  line  between  God 
and  nature  in  much  the  fashion  of  the  church  fathers  later. 
But  he  granted  that  "before  now  some  men  have  conjectu- 
rally  predicted  disturbances  and  commotions  of  the  earth 
from  the  revolutions  of  the  heavenly  bodies,  and  innumerable 
other  events  which  have  turned  out  most  exactly  true."  ^ 
Philo's  interest  in  astronomy  and  astrology  is  further  sug- 
gested by  his  interpretation  of  the  eleven  stars  of  Joseph's 
dream  as  referring  to  the  signs  of  the  zodiac,^  Joseph  him- 
self making  the  twelfth;  and  by  his  interpreting  the  ladder 
in  Jacob's  dream  which  stretched  between  earth  and  heaven 
as  referring  to  the  air,^  into  which  earth's  evaporations  dis- 
solve, while  the  moon  is  not  pure  ether  like  the  other  stars 
but  itself  contains  some  air.  This  accounts,  Philo  thinks, 
for  the  spots  upon  the  moon — an  explanation  which  I  do 
not  remember  having  met  in  subsequent  writers. 

Josephus  '^  and  the  Jews  in  general  of  Philo's  time  were 
equally  devoted  to  astrology  according  to  Miinter,  who  says : 
"Only  their  astrology  was  subordinated  to  theism.  The  one 
God  always  appeared  as  the  master  of  the  host  of  heaven. 
But  they  regarded  the  stars  as   living  divine  beings  and 


^  De  monarchia,  I,  i ;  De  mundi 
opiRcio,  cap.   14. 

^  De  monarchia,  I,  i;  Dc  migra- 
tione  Abrahamij  cap.  32;  De 
mundi  opiUcio,  cap.  40. 

*  Eusebius,    De    praep.    Evang., 


cap.  13. 

*  De  mundi  opiUcio,  cap.  19. 

^  De  somniis,  II,   16. 

'Ibid.,  I,  22. 

'De  hello  Jud.,  V,  5,  5;  Antiq., 
III.  7,  7-8. 


XIV 


PHILO  JUDAEUS 


355 


powers  of  heaven."  ^  In  the  Talmud  later  we  read  that 
the  hour  of  Abraham's  birth  was  announced  by  the  stars 
and  that  he  feared  from  his  observations  of  the  constella- 
tions that  he  would  go  childless.  Miinter  also  gives  examples 
of  the  belief  of  the  rabbis  in  the  influence  of  the  stars  upon 
the  destiny  of  the  Jewish  people  and  upon  the  fate  of  indi- 
vidual men,  and  of  their  belief  that  a  star  would  announce 
the  coming  of  the  Messiah.^ 

From  Philo's  astrology  it  is  an  easy  step  to  his  frequent  Perfection 
reveries  concerning  the  perfection  and  mystic  significance  number 
of  certain  numbers, — a  train  of  thought  which  was  continued  seven, 
by  many  of  the  church  fathers,  and  is  also  found  in  various 
pagan  writers  of  the  Roman  Empire.^  Thomas  Browne  in 
his  enquiry  into  "Vulgar  Errors"  ^  was  inclined  to  hold 
Philo  even  more  responsible  than  Pythagoras  or  Plato  for 
the  dissemination  of  such  doctrines.  Philo  himself  recognizes 
the  close  connection  between  astrolog}'  and  number  mys- 
ticism, when,  after  affirming  the  dependence  of  all  earthly 
things  upon  the  heavenly  bodies,  he  adds :  "It  is  in  heaven, 
too,  that  the  ratio  of  the  number  seven  began."  ^  Philo 
doubts  if  it  is  possible  to  express  adequately  the  glories  of 
the  number  seven,  but  he  feels  that  he  ought  at  least  to 
attempt  it  and  devotes  a  dozen  chapters  of  his  treatise  on 
the  creation  of  the  world  to  it,^  to  say  nothing  of  other  pas- 
sages. He  notes  that  there  are  seven  planets,  seven  circles 
of  heaven,  four  quarters  of  the  moon  of  seven  days  each, 
that  such  constellations  as  the  Pleiades  and  Ursa  Major 
consist  of  seven  stars,  and  that  children  born  at  the  end  of 


^  Der  Stern  der  Weisen  (1827), 
p.  36.  "Nur  war  ihre  Astrologie 
dem  Theismus  untergeordnet. 
Der  Eine  Gott  erschien  immer  als 
der  Herrscher  des  Himmelsheeres. 
Sie  betrachteten  aber  die  Sterne 
als  lebende  gottliche  Wesen  und 
Machte  des  Himmels." 

'Miinter  (1827),  pp.  38-39,  43, 
45,  etc.  On  the  subject  of  Jewish 
astrology  see  also :  D.  Nielsen, 
Die  altarabische  Mondreligion 
und  '^'^  mosaische   Uberlieferung, 


Strasburg,  1904;  F.  Hommel,  Der 
Gcstirndienst  der  alien  Araber 
und  die  altisraelitische  Uberlie- 
ferung, Munich,  1901. 

'  Such  as  Aulus  Gellius,  Mac- 
robius,  and  Censorinus.  These 
writers  seem  to  have  taken  it  from 
Varro.  We  have  also  noted  num- 
ber mysticism  in  Plutarch's  Es- 
says. 

*  Browne   (1650)    IV,  12. 

^  De  mimdi  opificio,  cap.  40. 

^  Ibid.,  caps.   30-42. 


356  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

seven  months  live,  while  those  who  see  the  light  in  the 
eighth  month  die.  In  diseases  the  seventh  is  a  critical  day. 
Also  there  are  either  seven  ages  of  man's  life,  as  Hippocrates 
says,  or,  in  accordance  with  Solon's  lines,  man's  three-score 
years  and  ten  may  be  subdivided  into  ten  periods  of  seven 
years  each.  The  lyre  of  seven  strings  corresponds  to  the 
seven  planets,  and  in  speech  there  are  seven  vowels.  There 
are  seven  divisions  of  the  head — eyes,  ears,  nostrils,  and 
mouth,  seven  divisions  of  the  body,  seven  kinds  of  motion, 
seven  things  seen,  and  even  the  senses  are  seven  rather  than 
five  if  we  add  the  vocal  and  generative  organs.^ 

Philo's  ideal  sect,  the  Therapeutae,  are  wont  to  assemble 
as  a  prelude  to  their  greatest  feast  at  the  end  of  seven 
weeks,  "venerating  not  only  the  simple  week  of  seven  days 
but  also  its  multiplied  power,"  ^  but  the  chief  festival  itself 
occurs  on  the  fiftieth  day,  "the  most  holy  and  natural  of 
numbers,  being  compounded  of  the  power  of  the  right- 
angled  triangle,  which  is  the  principle  of  the  origination 
and  condition  of  the  whole."  ^ 

The  numbers  four  and  six,  however,  yield  little  to  seven 
and  fifty  in  the  matter  of  perfection.  It  was  the  fourth 
day  that  God  chose  for  the  creation  of  the  heavenly  bodies, 
and  He  did  not  need  six  days  for  the  entire  work  of  crea- 
tion, but  it  was  fitting  that  that  perfect  work  should  be 
accomplished  in  a  perfect  number  of  days.  Six  is  the  product 
of  the  first  female  number,  two,  and  the  first  male  number, 
three.  Indeed,  the  first  three  numbers,  one,  two,  and  three, 
whether  added  or  multiplied,  give  six.^  As  for  four,  there 
are  that  many  elements  and  seasons ;  it  is  the  only  number 
produced   by   the   same    number — two — whether   added   to 

^  For  the  later  influence  of  such  having  the  superior  dignity  of 
doctrines  in  the  Mohammedan  Prophet.  The  last  of  the  forty- 
world  see  D.  B.  Macdonald,  Mus-  nine  Imans,  this  Muhammad  ibn 
lini  Theology,  Jurisprudence,  and  Isma'il,  is  the  greatest  and  last  of 
Constitutional  Theory,  1903,  pp.  the  Prophets." 
42-3.  concerning  the  "Seveners"  3^^  ^-^^  contemplativa,  cap.  8. 
and  the  Twelvers  and  the  doc-  j^  ^jjj  ^^  recalled  that  the  fifty 
t","?.  of  the  hidden  Iman.            _  ^^^^^  ^^  ^^^  ^.          ^^  Justinian 

Ilnd.,     Thus   we  have  a  series  ^^^  similarly  divided. 
of   seven   times   seven   Imans,   the 

first,  and  thereafter  each  seventh,  *  De  mundi  opificio,  cap.  3. 


XIV  PHILO  JUDAEUS  357 

itself  or  multiplied  by  itself ;  it  is  the  first  square  and  as  such 
the  emblem  of  justice  and  equality;  it  also  represents  the 
cube  or  solid,  as  the  number  one  stands  for  a  point,  two  for 
a  line,  and  three  for  a  surface.^  Furthermore  four  is  the 
source  of  "the  all-perfect  decade,"  since  one  and  two  and 
three  and  four  make  ten.  At  this  we  begin  to  suspect,  and 
with  considerable  justification,  as  the  writings  of  other  dev- 
otees of  the  philosophy  of  numbers  would  show,  that  the 
number  of  perfect  numbers  is  legion.  We  may  not,  how- 
ever, follow  Philo  much  farther  on  this  topic.  Suffice  it  to 
add  that  he  finds  the  fifth  day  fitting  for  the  creation  of 
animals  possessed  of  five  senses,^  while  he  divides  the  ten 
plagues  of  Egypt  into  three  dealing  with  the  more  solid 
elements,  earth  and  water,  and  performed  by  Aaron;  three 
dealing  with  air  and  fire  which  were  entrusted  to  Moses; 
the  seventh  was  committed  to  both  Aaron  and  Moses ;  while 
the  other  three  God  reserved  for  Himself.^ 

Philo  believed  in  a  world  of  spirits,  both  the  angels  of  Spirits  of 
the  Jews  and  the  demons  of  the  Greeks.  When  God  said :  the  air. 
"Let  us  make  man,"  Philo  believed  that  He  was  addressing 
those  assistant  spirits  who  should  be  held  responsible  for 
the  viciousness  to  which  man  alone  of  all  creation  is  liable.* 
Of  the  divine  rational  natures  Philo  regarded  some  as  incor- 
poreal, others  like  the  stars  as  possessed  of  bodies.^  He  also 
believed  that  there  were  spirits  in  the  air  as  well  as  afar 
off  in  heaven.  He  could  not  see  why  the  air  should  not  be 
inhabited  when  there  were  stars  in  the  ether  and  fish  in 
the  sea  as  well  as  other  animals  upon  land.^  Indeed  he 
argued  that  it  would  be  absurd  that  the  element  which  was 
essential  for  the  vitality  even  of  land  and  aquatic  animals 
should  have  no  living  beings  of  its  own.  That  these  spirits 
of  the  air  must  be  invisible  did  not  trouble  him,  since  the 
human  soul  is  also  invisible. 

^ Dc  mundi  opificto,  caps.  15-16.  'Vita   Mosis,  I,    17. 

See  also   on  perfect  numbers   On  *  De   mundi  opificio,  cap.  24. 

the  Allegories  of  the  Sacred  Laws.  ^  Ibid.,  cap.  50. 

^Ibid.,    cap.    20.  '^ De  somniis,  II,  21-22. 


358 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Of  Philo's  five  books  on  dreams  only  two  are  extant. 
They  suffice  to  show,  however,  that  he  accepted  the  art  of 
divination  from  dreams.  Of  dreams  he  distinguished  three 
varieties :  those  direct  from  God  which  require  no  inter- 
pretation; those  in  which  the  dreamer's  mind  moves  in 
unison  with  the  world  soul,  and  which  are  neither  entirely 
clear  nor  yet  very  obscure — an  instance  is  Jacob's  vision  of 
the  ladder ;  and  third,  those  in  which  the  mind  is  moved  by  a 
prophetic  frenzy  of  its  own,  and  which  require  the  science 
of  interpretation — such  dreams  were  Joseph's  concerning 
his  brothers,  and  those  of  the  butler  and  the  baker  at 
Pharaoh's  court.^ 

The  recent  war  and  its  accompaniments  and  sequels  have 
brought  home  to  some  the  conviction  that  our  modern  civili- 
zation is  after  all  not  vastly  superior  to  that  of  some  preced- 
ing ages.  To  those  who  still  imagine  that  because  modern 
science  has  freed  us  from  much  past  superstition  concerning 
nature,  we  are  therefore  free  from  political  fakirs,  from 
social  absurdities,  and  from  fallacious  procedure  and  reason- 
ing in  many  departments  of  life,  the  reading  may  be  recom- 
mended of  a  passage  in  Philo's  treatise  on  dreams,^  in 
which  he  classifies  the  art  of  politics  along  with  that  of 
magic.  He  compares  Joseph's  coat  of  many  colors  to  "the 
much-variegated  web  of  political  aflFairs"  where  along  with 
"the  smallest  possible  portion  of  truth"  falsehoods  of  every 
shade  of  plausibility  are  interwoven;  and  he  compares  poli- 
ticians and  statesmen  to  augurs,  ventriloquists,  and  sorcerers, 
"men  skilful  in  juggling  and  in  incantations  and  in  tricks 
of  all  kinds,  from  whose  treacherous  arts  it  is  very  difficult 
to  escape."  He  adds  that  Moses  very  naturally  represented 
Joseph's  coat  as  blood-stained,  since  all  statecraft  is  tainted 
with  wars  and  bloodshed. 

Twelve  centuries  later  we  find  Philo's  association  of 
politicians  with  magicians  repeated  by  his  compatriot  Moses 
Maimonides  in  the  More  Nevochim  or  Guide  for  the  Per- 


^  De  soinniis,  II,  i. 


'  Cap.  38. 


XIV 


PHILO  JUDAEUS 


359 


plexed^  a  work  which  appeared  almost  immediately  in  Latin 
translation  and  from  which  this  very  passage  is  cited  by 
Albertus  Magnus  in  his  discussion  of  divination  by  dreams.^ 
There  are  some  men,  says  Albert,  in  whom  the  intellect  is 
abundant  and  active  and  clear.  Such  men  are  akin  to  the 
superior  substances,  that  is,  to  the  angels  and  stars,  and 
therefore  Moses  of  Egypt,  i.e.,  Maimonides,  calls  them 
sages.  But  there  are  others  who,  according  to  Albert,  con- 
found true  wisdom  with  sophistry  and  are  content  with 
mere  probabilities  and  imaginations  and  are  at  home  in. 
"rhetorical  and  civil  matters."  Maimonides,  however,  de- 
scribed this  class  a  little  differently,  saying  that  in  them  the 
imaginative  faculty  is  preponderant  and  the  rational  faculty 
imperfect.  "Whence  arises  the  sect  of  politicians,  of  legisla- 
tors, of  diviners,  of  enchanters,  of  dreamers,  ,  .  .  and  of 
prestidigiteurs  who  work  marvels  by  strange  cunning  and 
occult  arts."  ^ 


^11,  Z7. 

'Cap.  5. 

^  Since  I  finished  this  chapter,  I 
have  noted  that  the  "folk-lore  in 
the  Old  Testament"  has  led  Sir 
James  Frazer  to  write  a  passage 
on  "the  harlequins  of  history" 
somewhat  similar  to  that  of  Philo 
on  Joseph's  coat  of  many  colors. 
After  remarking  that  friends  and 
foes  behold  these  politicians  of  the 
present  and  historical  figures  of 
the  future  from  opposite  sides  and 


A  thought 
repeated 
by  Moses 

Maimon- 
ides and 
Albertus 
Magnus. 


see  only  that  particular  hue  of  the 
coat  which  happens  to  be  turned 
toward  them,  Sir  James  concludes 
(1918),  II,  502,  "It  is  for  the  im- 
partial historian  to  contemplate 
these  harlequins  from  every  side 
and  to  paint  them  in  their  coats 
of  many  colors,  neither  altogether 
so  white  as  they  appeared  to  their 
friends  nor  altogether  so  black  as 
they  seemed  to  their  enemies." 
But  who  can  paint  out  the  blood- 
stains ? 


CHAPTER  XV 

THE    GNOSTICS 

Difficulty  in  defining  Gnosticism — Magic  and  astrology  in  Gnosticism 
— Simon  Magus  as  a  Gnostic — Simon's  Helen — The  number  thirty  and 
the  moon — Ophites  and  Sethians — A  magical  diagram — Employment  of 
names  and  formulae — Seven  metals  and  planets — Magic  of  Simon's 
followers — Magic  of  Marcus  in  the  Eucharist— Other  magic  and  occult 
lore  of  Marcus — Name  and  number  magic — The  magic  vowels — Magic 
of  Carpocrates — The  Abraxas  and  the  number  365 — Astrology  of 
Basilides — The  Book  of  Helxai — Epiphanius  on  the  Elchasaites — The 
Book  of  the  Laws  of  Countries — Personality  of  Bardesanes — Sin 
possible  for  men,  angels,  and  stars — Does  fate  in  the  astrological  sense 
prevail? — National  laws  and  customs  as  a  proof  of  free  will — Pistis- 
Sophia;  attitude  to  astrology — "Magic"  condemned — Power  of  names 
and  rites — Interest  in  natural  science — "Gnostic  gems"  and  astrology — 
The  planets  in  early  Christian  art — Gnostic  amulets  in  Spain — Syriac 
Christian  charms — Priscillian  executed  for  magic — Manichean  manu- 
scripts— The  Mandaeans. 

Gnosticism  ^  is  not  easy  to  define  and  the  term  Gnostic 
appears  to  have  been  applied  to  a  great  variety  of  sects  with 
a  confusing  diversity  of  beHefs,  Many  of  the  constituents 
and  roots  at  least  of  Gnosticism  were  older  than  Christianity, 
and  it  is  now  the  custom  to  associate  the  Gnosis  or  superior 
knowledge  and  revelation,  which  gives  the  movement  its 
name,  not  with  Greek  philosophy  or  mysteries  but  with 
oriental  speculation  and  religions.  Anz  ^  has  been  im- 
pressed by  its  connection  with  Babylonian  star-worship; 
Amelineau  ^   has   urged   its   debt   to   Egyptian   magic   and 


*  A  good  account  of  the  Gnostic 
sources  and  bibliography  of  sec- 
ondary works  on  Gnosticism  will 
be  found  in  CE,  "Gnosticism" 
(ig09)  by  J.  P.  Arendzen. 

*  Anz,  Zur  Frage  nach  dem 
Ursprung  des  Gnosticismus,  1897, 


112  pp.,  in  TU,  XV,  4- 

^  Amelineau,  Essai  sur  le  gnos- 
ticisme  cgypticn,  ses  developpe- 
mcnts  ct  son  origine  egyptienne, 
1887,  330  pp.,  in  Musee  Guimet, 
torn.  14 ;  and  various  other  publi- 
cations by  the  same  author. 


360 


CHAP.  XV  THE  GNOSTICS  361 

religion ;  Bousset  ^  has  argued  for  Persian  origins.  The  main 
features  of  the  great  oriental  religions  which  swept  west- 
ward over  the  Roman  Empire  were  shared  by  Gnosticism: 
the  redeemer  god,  even  the  great  mother  goddess  conception 
to  some  extent,  the  divinely  revealed  mysteries,  the  secret 
symbols,  the  dualism,  and  the  cosmic  theory.  Gnosticism  as 
it  is  known  to  us,  however,  is  more  closely  connected  with 
Christianity  than  with  any  other  oriental  religion  or  body 
of  thought,  for  the  extant  sources  consist  almost  entirely 
either  of  Gnostic  treatises  which  pretend  to  be  Christian 
Scriptures  and  were  almost  entirely  written  in  Coptic  in 
the  second  or  third  century  of  our  era,^  or  of  hostile  descrip- 
tions of  Gnostic  heresies  by  the  early  church  fathers.  How- 
ever, the  philosopher  Plotinus  also  criticized  the  Gnostics,  as 
we  have  seen. 

What  especially  concerns  our  investigation  is  the  great  Magic  and 
use  made,  or  said  to  be  made,  by  the  Gnostics  of  sacred  ^^  Gnof- 
formulae,  symbols,  and  names  of  demons,  and  the  preva-  ticism. 
lence  among  them  of  astrological  theory  as  shown  by  their 
widespread  notion  of  the  seven  planets  as  the  powers  who 
have  created  our  inferior  and  material  world  and  who  rule 
over  its  affairs.  Gnosticism  was  deeply  influenced  by,  albeit 
it  to  some  extent  represents  a  reaction  against,  the  Baby- 
lonian star- worship  and  incantation  of  spirits.  The  seven 
planets  and  the  demons  occupy  an  important  place  in  Gnostic 
myth  because  they  intervene  between  our  world  and  the 
world  of  supreme  light,  and  their  spheres  must  be  traversed 
— much  as  in  the  Book  of  Enoch  and  Dante's  Paradiso — 
both  by  the  redeeming  god  in  his  descent  and  return  and  by 
any  human  soul  that  would  escape  from  this  world  of  fate, 
darkness,  and  matter.  What  encouragement  there  is  for 
such  views  in  the  canonical  Scriptures  themselves  may  be 

*  Bousset,     Hauptprohleme     der  although  announced  to  be  edited 

Gnosis,    191 1 ;    and    "Gnosticism"  by  C.   Schmidt  in   TU.     Grenfell 

in  EB,  nth  edition.  and    Hunt    will    soon    publish    "a 

*The   dating    is    somewhat    dis-  small     group     of     21     papyri  .  .  . 

puted.    Some  of  the  Gnostic  writ-  among  which  is  a  gnostic  magical 

ings    discovered    in    1896    have,    I  text   of    some   interest" :    Grenfell 

believe,    not    yet   been   published,  (1921),  p.  151. 


362  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

inferred  from  the  following  passage  in  which  Christ  fore- 
tells His  second  coming:  "Immediately  after  the  tribula- 
tion of  those  days  shall  the  sun  be  darkened,  and  the  moon 
shall  not  give  her  light,  and  the  stars  shall  fall  from  heaven, 
and  the  powers  of  the  heavens  shall  he  shaken.  And  then 
shall  appear  the  sign  of  the  Son  of  man  in  heaven;  and  then 
shall  all  the  tribes  of  the  earth  mourn,  and  they  shall  see  the 
Son  of  man  coming  in  the  clouds  of  heaven  with  power  and 
great  glory.  And  He  shall  send  His  angels  with  a  great 
sound  of  a  trumpet,  and  they  shall  gather  together  His  elect 
from  the  four  winds,  from  one  end  of  heaven  to  the  other."  ^ 
But  in  order  to  pass  the  demons  and  the  spheres  of  the 
planets,  who  are  usually  represented  as  opposed  to  this,  one 
must,  as  in  the  Egyptian  Book  of  the  Dead,  know  the  pass- 
words, the  names  of  the  spirits,  the  sacred  formulae,  the 
appropriate  symbols,  and  all  the  other  apparatus  suggestive 
of  magic  and  necromancy  which  forms  so  large  a  part  of 
the  gnosis  that  gives  its  name  to  the  system.  This  will  be- 
come the  more  apparent  from  the  following  particular 
accounts  of  Gnostic  sects  and  doctrines  found  in  the  works 
of  the  Christian  fathers  and  in  the  scanty  remains  of  the 
Gnostics  themselves.  The  philosopher  Plotinus  we  have 
already  heard  charge  the  Gnostics  with  resort  to  magic  and 
sorcery,  and  with  ascribing  evil  and  fatal  influence  to  the 
stars.  At  the  same  time  we  shrewdly  suspect  that  Gnosticism 
has  been  made  a  scapegoat  for  the  sins  in  these  regards  of 
both  early  Christianity  and  pagan  philosophy. 
Simon  Simon  Magus,  of  whose  magical  exploits  as  recorded  by 

Magus  as     many  a  Christian  writer  we  shall  treat  in  another  chapter, 
a  Gnostic.  ... 

is  also  represented  by  the  fathers  as  holding  Gnostic  doctrine, 

although  some  writers  have  contended  that  Simon  the 
magician  named  in  Acts  was  an  entirely  different  person 
from  Simon  the  heretic  and  author  of  The  Great  Declara- 
tion?  Simon  declared  himself  the  Great  Power  of  God,  or 

^  The      Gospel      of      Matthew,  ^  St.      George     Stock,      "Simon 

XXIV,     29-31.     Not    to     mention  Magus,"  in  EB,  nth  edition.    See 

Paul's    "angels    anH    principalities  also  George  Salmon  in  Diet.  Chris. 

and  powers."  Biog.,  IV,  681. 


XV 


THE  GNOSTICS  363 


the  Being  who  was  over  all,  who  had  appeared  in  Samaria 
as  the  Father,  in  Judea  as  the  Son,  and  to  other  nations  as 
the  Holy  Spirit.^  In  the  Pseudo-Clementines  Simon  is  rep- 
resented as  arguing  against  Peter  in  characteristically  Gnos- 
tic style  that  "he  who  framed  the  world  is  not  the  highest 
God,  but  that  the  highest  God  is  another  who  alone  is  good 
and  who  has  remained  unknown  up  to  this  time."  ^  Accord- 
ing to  Epiphanius  Simon  claimed  to  have  descended  from 
heaven  through  the  planetary  spheres  and  spirits  in  the 
manner  of  the  Gnostic  redeemer.  He  is  quoted  as  saying, 
"But  in  each  heaven  I  changed  my  form  in  accordance  with 
the  form  of  those  who  were  in  each  heaven,  that  I  might 
escape  the  notice  of  my  angelic  powers  and  come  down  to 
the  Thought,  who  is  none  other  than  she  who  is  likewise 
called  Prounikon  and  the  Holy  Spirit."  Epiphanius  further 
informs  us  that  Simon  believed  in  a  plurality  of  heavens, 
assigned  certain  powers  to  each  firmament  and  heaven,  and 
applied  barbaric  names  to  these  spirits  or  cosmic  forces. 
"Nor,"  adds  Epiphanius,  "can  anyone  be  saved  unless  he 
learns  this  mystic  lore  and  offers  such  sacrifices  to  the 
Father  of  all  through  these  archons  and  authorities."  ^ 

The  fathers  tell  us  that  Simon  went  about  with  a  woman  Simon's 
called  Helena  or  Helen,  who  Justin  Martyr  says  had  for- 
merly been  a  prostitute.^  Simon  is  said  to  have  called  her 
the  mother  of  all,  through  whom  God  had  created  the  angels 
and  aeons,  who  in  their  turn  had  formed  the  world  and  men. 
These  cosmic  powers  had  then,  however,  cast  her  down  to 
earth,  where  she  had  been  confined  in  various  successive 
human  and  animal  bodies.  She  seems  to  have  obtained  her 
name  of  Helen  from  the  fact  that  it  was  for  her  that  the 
Trojan  war  had  been  fought,  an  event  which  Simon  seems 
to  have  subjected  to  much  allegorical  interpretation.  He 
also  spoke  of  Helen  as  "the  lost  sheep,"  whom  he,  the  Great 

^  Irenaeus,   Against  Heresies,   I,  XXI ;    Petavius,    55-60 ;    Dindorf, 

23.  II,  6-12. 
^Homilies,  XVIII,    i-. 

*  Epiphanius,      Paiiarion,      A-E-  *  First  Apology,  cap.  26. 


364 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


The  num- 
ber thirty 
and  the 
moon. 


Power,  had  descended  from  heaven  to  release  from  the  bonds 
of  the  flesh.  She  was  that  Thought  or  Holy  Spirit  which 
we  have  heard  him  say  he  came  down  to  recover.  Simon's 
Helen  also  corresponds  to  Pistis-Sophia,  who  in  the  extant 
Gnostic  work  named  after  her  descends  through  the  twelve 
aeons,  deceived  by  a  lion- faced  power  whom  they  have 
formed  to  mislead  her,  and  then  reascends  by  the  aid  of 
Jesus  or  the  true  light.  It  seems  fairly  evident  that  the 
fathers  ^  have  taken  literally  and  travestied  by  a  scandalous 
application  to  an  actual  woman  a  beautiful  Gnostic  myth  or 
allegory  concerning  the  human  soul.  At  the  same  time 
Simon's  Helen  reminds  us  of  Jesus's  relations  with  the 
woman  taken  in  adultery,  the  woman  of  Samaria,  and  Mary 
Magdalene.  Mary  Magdalene,  it  may  be  noted,  in  the  Gnos- 
tic writing,  Pistis-Sophia,  takes  a  role  superior  to  the  twelve 
disciples,  a  fact  of  which  Peter  complains  to  his  Lord  more 
than  once.  But  Simon's  Helen  was  that  spirit  of  truth  which 
lies  latent  in  the  human  mind  and  which  he  endeavored  to 
release  by  means  of  the  philosophy,  astrology,  and  magic  of 
his  time.  May  modern  scientific  method  prove  more  suc- 
cessful in  setting  the  prisoner  free ! 

We  find  in  the  Pseudo-Clementines  other  details  con- 
cerning Simon  and  Helen  which  bring  out  the  astrological 
side  of  Gnosticism.  We  are  told  that  John  the  Baptist  had 
thirty  disciples,  a  number  suggestive  of  the  days  of  the 
moon  and  also  of  the  thirty  aeons  of  the  Gnostics  of  whom 
we  elsewhere  hear  a  great  deal.^  But  the  revolution  of  the 
moon  does  not  occupy  thirty  full  days,  so  that  we  are  not 
surprised  to  learn  that  one  of  these  disciples  was  a  woman 
and  furthermore  that  she  was  the  very  Helen  of  whom  we 
have  been  speaking.  At  least,  she  is  so  called  in  the  Homilies 
of  the  Pseudo-Clement ;  in  the  Recognitions  she  is  actually 


^  Irenaeus  and  Epiphanius  as 
cited  above;  also  Hippolytus, 
Philosophumena,  VI,   2-15;   X,  8. 

^  See,  for  example,  Irenaeus, 
Against  Heresies,  I,  i,  3.  where  we 
are  told  among  other  things  that 


the  disciples  of  the  Gnostic  Valen- 
tinus  affirm  that  the  number  of 
these  aeons  is  signified  by  the 
thirty  years  of  Christ's  life  which 
elapsed  before  He  began  His  pub- 
lic ministry. 


XV  THE  GNOSTICS  365 

called  Luna  or  the  Moon.^  After  the  death  of  John  the 
Baptist  Simon  by  his  magic  power  supplanted  Dositheus  as 
leader  of  the  thirty,  and  then  fell  in  love  with  Luna  and 
went  about  with  her,  proclaiming-  that  she  was  Wisdom  or 
Truth,  "brought  down  .  ,  .  from  the  highest  heavens  to 
this  world."  ^  The  number  thirty  is  again  associated  with 
Simon  and  Dositheus  in  a  curiously  insistent,  although  ap- 
parently unconscious,  manner  by  Origen,  who  in  one  passage 
of  his  Reply  to  Celsus,  written  in  the  first  half  of  the  third 
century,  expresses  doubt  whether  thirty  followers  of  Simon, 
the  Samaritan  magician,  can  be  found  in  all  the  world,  and 
in  a  second  passage,  while  asserting  that  "Simonians  are 
found  nowhere  throughout  the  world,"  adds  that  of  the  fol- 
lowers of  Dositheus  there  are  now  not  more  than  thirty  in 
all.3 

Similar  to  Simon's  account  of  the  heavens  and  of  his  Ophites 
descent  through  them  were  the  teachings  of  the  Ophites  and  Sethians. 
Sethians  who,  according  to  Irenaeus,*  held  that  Christ 
"descended  through  the  seven  heavens,  having  assumed  the 
likeness  of  their  sons,  and  gradually  emptied  them  of  their 
power."  These  heretics  also  represented  the  "heavens, 
potentates,  powers,  angels,  and  creators  as  sitting  in  their 
proper  order  in  heaven,  according  to  their  generation,  and 
as  invisibly  ruling  over  things  celestial  and  terrestrial."  All 
ruling  spirits  were  not  invisible,  however,  since  the  Ophites 
and  Sethians  identified  with  the  seven  planets  their  Holy 
Hebdomad,  consisting  of  laldabaoth,  lao,  Sabaoth,  Adonaus 
(or,  Adonai),  Eloeus,  Oreus,  and  Astanphaeus, — names 
often  employed  in  the  Greek  magical  papyri,^  in  medieval 
incantations,  and  in  the  Jewish  Cabbala.  The  Ophites  and 
Sethians  further  asserted  that  when  the  serpent  was  cast 
down  into  the  lower  world  by  the  Father,  he  begat  six  sons 

^  Homilies,    II,     23-25 ;     Recog-  "  G.  Parthey,  Zzvei  griech.  Zau- 

nitions,  II,  8-9.  berpapyri  des  Berliner  Museums, 

^Homilies,  II,  25.  i860,  p.   128;   C.  Wessely,  Griech. 

^  Reply  to  Celsus,  I,  57,  and  VI,  Zaubcrpapyrus     von     Paris     und 

II.  London,  1888,  p.  115;  F.  G.  Ken- 

*  Irenaeus,  Against  Heresies,  I,  yon,  Greek  Papyri  in  the  British 

30.  Museum,  1893,  p.  469ff. 


366  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 

who,  with  himself,  constitute  a  group  of  seven  corresponding 
and  in  contrast  to  the  Holy  Hebdomad  which  surround  the 
Father.  They  are  the  seven  mundane  demons  who  are  ever 
hostile  to  humanity.  The  Sethians  of  course  took  their 
name  from  Seth,  son  of  Adam,  who  in  the  middle  ages  was 
regarded  sometimes,  like  Enoch,  as  the  especial  recipient  of 
divine  revelation  and  as  the  author  of  sacred  books.  The 
historian  Josephus  states  in  his  Jewish  Antiquities  that  Seth 
and  his  descendants  discovered  the  art  of  astronomy  and 
that  one  of  the  two  pillars  on  which  they  recorded  their 
findings  was  still  extant  in  his  time,  the  first  century.-"- 
Under  the  caption,  Sethian  Tablets  of  Curses,  Wiinsch  has 
published  some  magical  imprecations  scratched  on  lead  tab- 
lets between  390  and  420  A.  D.  at  Rome.^  Eight  revela- 
tions ascribed  to  Adam  and  Seth  are  also'  extant  in  Ar- 


menian 


3 


A  magical  In  Origen's  Reply  to  Celsus  is  described  a  mystic  dia- 

gram with  details  redolent  of  magic  and  astrological  necro- 
mancy,"^ which  Celsus  had  laid  to  the  charge  of  Christians 
generally  but  which  Origen  declares  is  probably  the  product 
of  the  "very  insignificant  sect  called  Ophites."  Origen  him- 
self has  seen  this  diagram  or  one  something  like  it,  and 
assures  his  readers  that  "we  know  the  depth  of  these  un- 
hallowed mysteries,"  but  he  declares  that  he  has  never  met 
anybody  anywhere  who  put  any  faith  in  this  diagram.  Ob- 
viously, however,  such  a  diagram  would  not  have  been  in 
existence  if  no  one  had  ever  had  faith  in  it.  Furthermore, 
its  survival  into  Origen's  time,  when  he  asserts  that  men 
had  ceased  to  use  it,  is  evidence  of  the  antiquity  of  the  sect 
and  the  superstition.  In  this  diagram  ten  distinct  circles 
were  united  by  a  single  circle  representing  the  soul  of  all 

*  Josephus,  Antiquities,  I,  ii,  3.  Apocrypha,  Venice,  1896. 

a-D    \X7"       u     r  ir  ■     •    i      j/  ''The    diagram    is    described    in 

R.  Wunsch,  Sethramsche  Ver-      ^^^  ^     ^     ^^  ^^i         y^  g    .^ 

nuchungstafeln    aus    Rom,     Leip-  ^^^    following   description   I    have 

zig,  i»9«.  somewhat  aUered  the  order.     An 

'  E.    Preuschen,    Die    apocryph.  attempt  to  reproduce  this  diagram 

gnost.  Adamschrift,  1900.    Mechi-  will  be  found  in  CE,  "Gnosticism," 

tarist  collection  of  Old  Testament  p.  597. 


XV  THE  GNOSTICS  z^7 

things  and  called  Leviathan.  Celsus  spoke  of  the  upper 
circles,  of  which  at  least  some  were  in  colors,  as  "those  that 
are  above  the  heavens.''  On  these  were  inscribed  such  words 
and  phrases  as  "Father  and  Son,"  "Love,"  "Life,"  "Knowl- 
edge," and  "Understanding."  Then  there  were  "the  seven 
circles  of  archontic  demons,"  who  are  probably  to  be  con- 
nected with  the  spheres  of  the  seven  planets.  These  seven 
ruling  demons  were  represented  by  animal  heads  or  figures, 
somewhat  resembling  the  symbols  of  the  four  evangelists 
to  be  seen  in  the  mosaics  at  Ravenna  and  elsewhere  in  Chris- 
tian art.  The  angel  Michael  was  depicted  by  a  sort  of 
chimaera,  the  words  of  Celsus  being,  "The  goat  was  shaped 
like  a  lion"  ;  Suriel,  by  a  bull ;  Raphael,  by  a  dragon ;  Gabriel, 
by  an  eagle;  Thautabaoth,  by  a  bear;  Erataoth,  by  a  dog; 
and  Thaphabaoth  or  Onoel,  by  an  ass.  The  diagram  was 
divided  by  a  thick  black  line  called  Gehenna  and  beneath  the 
lowest  circle  was  placed  "the  being  named  Behemoth." 
There  was  also  "a  square  pattern"  with  inscriptions  con- 
cerning the  gates  of  paradise,  a  flaming  circle  with  a  flaming 
sword  as  its  diameter  guarding  the  tree  of  knowledge  and 
of  life,  "a  barrier  inscribed  in  the  shape  of  a  hatchet,"  and  a 
rhomboid  with  the  words,  "The  foresight  of  wisdom." 
Celsus  further  mentioned  a  seal  with  which  the  Father  im- 
presses the  Son,  who  says,  "I  have  been  anointed  with  white 
ointment  from  the  tree  of  life,"  and  seven  angels  who  con- 
tend with  the  seven  ruling  demons  for  the  soul  of  the  dying 
body. 

Origen  further  informs  us  of  the  forms  of  salutation   Employ- 
to  each  ruling  spirit  employed  by  "those  sorcerers,"  as  they  ™ames  and 
pass  through  "the  fence  of  wickedness"  or  the  gate  to  the  formulae, 
realm  of  each  spirit.     The  names  of  the  spirits  are  now 
given  as  laldabaoth,  who  is  the  lion-like  archon  and  with 
whom  the  planet  Saturn  is  in  sympathy,  lao  or  Jah,  Sabaoth, 
Adonaeus,  Astaphaeus,  Aloaeus  or  Eloaeus,  and  Horaeus. 
The  following  is  an  example  of  the  salutations  or  invoca- 
tions addressed  to  these  spirits :    "Thou,  O  second  lao,  who 
shinest  by  night,  who  art  the  ruler  of  the  secret  mysteries 


368 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Seven 
metals  and 
planets. 


Magic  of 

Simon's 

followers. 


of  Son  and  Father,  first  prince  of  death,  and  portion  of  the 
innocent,  bearing  now  thine  own  beard  as  symbol,  I  am 
ready  to  pass  through  thy  realm,  having  strengthened  him 
who  is  born  of  thee  by  the  living  word.  Grace  be  with  me; 
Father,  let  it  be  with  me!"  Origen  also  states  that  the 
makers  of  this  diagram  have  borrowed  from  magic  the 
names  laldabaoth,  Astaphaeus,  and  Horaeus,  while  the  other 
four  are  names  of  God  drawn  from  the  Hebrew  Scriptures. 

It  is  worth  noting  that  immediately  before  this  account 
of  the  diagram  Celsus  had  described  similar  Persian  mys- 
teries of  Mithras,  in  which  seven  heavens  through  which 
the  soul  has  to  pass  were  arranged  in  an  ascending  scale 
like  a  ladder.^  Each  successive  heaven  was  entered  by  a 
gate  of  a  metal  corresponding  to  the  planet  in  question, 
lead  for  Saturn,  tin  for  Venus,  copper  for  Jupiter,  iron  for 
Mercury,  a  mixed  metal  for  Mars,  silver  for  the  moon,  and 
gold  for  the  sun.  This  association  of  metals  and  planets 
became  a  common  feature  of  medieval  alchemy.  At  the 
same  time  the  passage  is  said  to  be  our  chief  literary  source 
for  the  mysteries  of  Mithras.^ 

The  Simonians,  according  to  Irenaeus,  were  as  addicted 
to  magic  as  their  founder  had  been,  employing  exorcisms 
and  incantations,  love-philters  and  enchantments,  familiar 
spirits  and  "dream-senders."  "And  whatever  other  curi- 
ous arts  may  be  resorted  to  are  eagerly  employed  by  them." 
Menander,  the  immediate  successor  of  Simon  in  Samaria, 
was  "a  perfect  adept  in  the  practice  of  magic"  and  taught 
that  by  means  of  it  one  could  overcome  the  angels  who  had 
created  this  world. ^  In  a  treatise  on  rebaptism,  falsely  as- 
cribed to  Cyprian  but  very  likely  contemporary  with  him, 
it  is  stated  that  the  Simonians  regard  their  baptism  as  su- 
perior to  that  of  orthodox  Christians,  because  when  they 
descend  into  the  water  fire  appears  upon  its  surface.  The 
writer  thinks  that  this  is  done  by  some  trick,  or  that  there 
is  some  natural  explanation  of  it,  or  that  they  merely  imag- 


*  Reply  to  Celsus,  VI,  22. 
*Anz.  (1897),  p.  78. 


^  Adv.  haer.,  I,  23. 


XV  THE  GNOSTICS  369 

ine  that  they  see  a  flame  on  the  water,  or  that  It  is  the 
work  of  some  evil  one  and  of  magic  power.^  Epiphanius 
states  that  Simon  employed  such  obscene  substances  as 
semen  and  menstruum  in  his  magic,"  but  this  seems  to  be  a 
slander,  at  least  against  Gnosticism,  since  in  a  passage  of 
the  Gnostic  Book  of  the  Saznour,  adjoined  to  the  Pistis- 
Sophia,  Thomas  asks  Jesus  what  shall  be  the  punishment  of 
men  who  eat  ''semen  maris  et  menstruum  feminae"  mixed 
with  lentils,  saying  as  they  do  so,  "We  believe  in  Esau  and 
Jacob,"  and  is  told  that  this  is  the  worst  of  sins  and  that 
the  souls  of  those  committing  it  will  be  absolutely  blotted 
out.^ 

Next  to  Simon  Magus,   Marcus  was  the  Gnostic  and   Magic  of 
heretic  most  notorious  as  a  practitioner  of  the  magic  arts,  as   jn^the^^ 
Irenaeus  states   at  the  close  of  the  second   century,   and   Eucharist. 
Hippolytus  and  Epiphanius  repeat  in  the  third  and  fourth 
centuries    respectively.*     In   performing   the    Eucharist    he 
would  change  white  wine  placed  in  three  wine  cups  into  three 
different  colors,  one  blood-red,  one  purple,  and  one  dark 
blue,  according  to  Epiphanius,  while  Irenaeus  and  Hippoly- 
tus more  vaguely  state,  although  they  lived  closer  to  Mar- 
cus's time,  that  he  gave  the  wine  a  purple  or  reddish  hue  as 
if   it  had   been   changed   into   blood,    an   alteration   which 
Marcus  himself  regarded  as  a  manifestation  of  divine  grace. 
Epiphanius  attributes  the  change  to  an  incantation  muttered 
by    Marcus    while   pretending  to   perform    the    Eucharist. 

*  Wm.  Hartel,  S.  Thasci  Caecili  *  Irenaeus,  Against  Heresies,   I, 

Cypriani  Opera  Omnia,  Pars  III,  13,    et    seq.;    Hippolytus,    Philo- 

Opcra  Spuria    (1870),   p.   90,   De  sophumena,     VI,      34,      et     seq.; 

rebaptismate,    cap.     16,    "quod    si  Epiphanius,    Panarion,    ed.    Din- 

aliquo  lusu  perpetrari  potest,  sicut  dorf,  II,  217,  et  seq.   (ed.  Petav., 

adfirmantur     plerique     huiusmodi  232,  et  seq.).    Concerning  Marcus 

lusus  Anaxilai  esse,  sive  naturale  see    further   TertulHan,   De   prae- 

quid  est  quo  pacto  possit  hoc  con-  script.,     L;     Theodoret,     Haeret. 

tingere,    sive    illi    putant    hoc    se  Fab.,  I,  9;  Jerome,  Epist.,  29;  Au- 

conspicere,    sive    maligni    opus    et  gustine,      Haer.,      xiv.      "D'apres 

magicum    virus    ignem    potest    in  Reuvens,"   says   Berthelot    (1885), 

aqua  exprimere."  p.  57,  "le  papyrus  n°  75  de  Leide 

'Contra  haercses,  II,  2.  renferme  un  melange  de  recettes 

'      '  magiques,    alchimiques,    et   d  idees 

'  Pistis-Sophia,     ed.     Schwartze  gnostiques;     ces     dernieres     em- 

and  Peter mann  (1851),  pp.  386-7;  pruntees    aux    doctrines    de    Mar- 

ed.  Mead  (1896),  p.  390.  cus." 


370 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Other 
magic  and 
occult 
lore  of 

Marcus. 


Name  and 

number 

magic. 


Hippolytus,  who  ascribes  Marcus's  feats  partly  to  sleight- 
of-hand  and  partly  to  demons,  in  this  case  charges  that  he 
furtively  dropped  some  drug  into  the  wine.  Marcus  was 
also  accustomed  to  fill  a  large  cup  from  a  smaller  one  so 
that  it  would  overflow,  a  marvel  which  Hippolytus  again 
tries  to  account  for  by  stating  that  "very  many  drugs,  when 
mingled  in  this  way  with  liquid  substances"  temporarily 
increase  their  volume,  "especially  when  diluted  in  wine." 

Irenaeus,  who  is  quoted  verbatim  by  Epiphanius,  fur- 
ther states  that  Marcus  had  a  familiar  demon  by  whose  aid 
he  was  able  to  prophesy,  and  that  he  pretended  to  confer 
this  gift  upon  others.  He  also  accuses  Marcus  of  seducing 
women  by  means  of  philters  and  love  potions  which  he 
compounded.  Hippolytus  does  not  make  these  charges,  but 
unites  with  the  others  in  describing  at  length  Marcus's  the- 
ory of  mystic  names  and  his  symbolical  and  mystical  inter- 
pretation of  the  letters  of  the  alphabet  and  of  numbers. 
Marcus  made  various  calculations  based  upon  the  number 
of  letters  in  a  name,  the  number  of  letters  in  the  name  of 
each  letter,  and  so  on.  When  Christ,  whose  ineffable  name 
has  thirty  letters,  said,  "I  am  Alpha  and  Omega,"  He  was 
believed  by  Marcus  to  have  displayed  the  dove,  whose  num- 
ber is  80 1,  These  reveries  "are  mere  bits,"  as  Hippolytus 
says,  of  astrological  theory  and  Pythagorean  philosophy. 
We  shall  find  them  perpetuated  in  the  middle  ages  in  the 
method  of  divination  known  as  the  Sphere  of  Pythagoras. 

Such  symbolism  and  mysticism  concerning  numbers  and 
letters  seldom  indeed  remain  a  matter  of  mere  theory  but 
readily  lend  themselves  to  operative  magic.  Thus  Hippolytus 
can  speak  in  the  same  breath  of  "magical  arts  and  Pythag- 
orean numbers"  or  tell  that  Pythagoras  himself  "also 
touched  on  magic,  as  they  say,  and  himself  discovered  an 
art  of  physiognomy,  laying  down  as  a  basis  certain  numbers 
and  measures."  Or  note  a  third  passage  where  Hippolytus 
is  discussing  Egyptian  theology  based  on  the  theory  of 
numbers.^    After  treating  of  the  monad,  duad,  and  enneads, 

*  Hippolytus,    Philosophumcna,    VI,  preface;  I,  2;  and  IV,  43-4. 


XV  THE  GNOSTICS  37i 

of  the  four  elements  in  pairs,  of  the  360  parts  of  the  circle, 
of  "ascending  and  beneficent  and  masculine  names"  which 
end  in  odd  numbers,  and  of  feminine  and  malicious  and 
descending-  names  which  terminate  in  even  numbers,  Hippo- 
lytus  continues,  "Moreover,  they  assert  that  they  have  cal- 
culated the  word,  'Deity.'  Now  this  name  is  an  even  num- 
ber, and  they  write  it  down  and  attach  it  to  the  body  and 
accomplish  cures  by  it.  In  the  same  way  an  herb  which 
terminates  in  this  number  is  bound  around  the  body  and 
operates  by  reason  of  a  similar  calculation  of  the  number. 
Nay,  even  a  doctor  cures  the  sick  by  such  calculations." 
Similarly  Censorinus  states  that  the  number  seven  is  as- 
cribed to  Apollo  and  used  in  the  cure  of  bodily  ills,  while 
nine  is  associated  with  the  Muses  and  heals  mental  dis- 
eases.^    But  to  return  to  Gnosticism. 

The  seven  vowels  were  much  employed  by  the  Gnostics,  The  magic 
undoubtedly  as  symbols  for  the  seven  planets  and  the  spirits 
associated  with  them,  but  as  symbols  possessed  of  magic 
power  as  well  as  of  mystic  significance.  "The  Saviour  and 
His  disciples  are  supposed  in  the  midst  of  their  sentences  to 
have  broken  out  in  an  interminable  gibberish  of  only  vowels ; 
magic  spells  have  come  down  to  us  consisting  of  vowels  by 
the  fourscore ;  on  amulets  the  seven  vowels,  repeated  accord- 
ing to  all  sorts  of  artifices,  form  a  very  common  inscrip- 
tion." ^  As  the  seven  planets  made  the  music  of  the  spheres, 
so  the  seven  vowels  seem  to  have  represented  the  musical 
scale,  "and  many  a  Gnostic  sheet  of  vowels  is  in  fact  a  sheet 
of  music."  ^ 

Other  heretics  with  Gnostic  views  who  were  accused  of  Magic  of 
magic  by  the  fathers  were  the  followers  of  Carpocrates,  who   ^SSg" 
employed  incantations  and  spells,  philters  and  potions,  who 
attracted  spirits  to  themselves  and  made  light  of  the  cosmic 
angels,  and  who  pretended  to  have  great  power  over  all 

^  Censorinus,  De  die  natali,  caps.  '  Ruelle    et     Poiree,    Le    chant 

7  and  14.  gnostico-magique,  Solesmes,  1901. 

'Arendzen,  Gnosticism,  in  CE, 


372 


MAGIC  'AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


The 

Abraxas 
and  the 
number 
365. 


Astrology 
of  Basi- 
lides. 


The  Book 
of  Helxai. 


things   so  that  they  were  able  by  their  magic  to  satisfy 
every  desire.^ 

Saturninus  and  Basilides  were  charged  with  "practicing 
magic,  and  employing  images,  incantations,  invocations, 
and  every  other  kind  of  curious  art."  They  also  believed 
in  a  supreme  power  named  Abrasax  or  Abraxas,  whose 
number  was  365 ;  and  they  contended  that  there  were  365 
heavens  and  as  many  bones  in  the  human  body;  "and  they 
strive  to  set  forth  the  names,  principles,  angels,  and  powers 
of  the  365  imagined  heavens,"  ^ 

Hippolytus  gives  further  indication  of  the  astrological 
leanings  of  Basilides,  who  held  that  each  thing  had  its  own 
particular  time,  and  supported  his  view  by  citing  the  Magi 
gazing  wistfully  at  the  star  of  Bethlehem  and  the  remark  of 
Christ  Himself,  "Mine  hour  is  not  yet  come."  ^  I  suppose 
that  by  this  Hippolytus  means  to  suggest  that  Basilides  held 
the  astrological  doctrine  of  elections;  Basilides  further  af- 
firmed, according  to  Hippolytus,  that  Jesus  was  "mentally 
preconceived  at  the  time  of  the  generation  of  the  stars ;  and 
of  the  complete  return  to  their  starting  point  of  all  the  sea- 
sons in  the  vast  conglomeration,"  that  is,  at  the  end  of  the 
astronomical  magmis  annus,  variously  reckoned  as  of  36,000 
or  15,000  years  in  duration. 

In  his  Refutation  of  all  Heresies  *  Hippolytus  tells  of  an 
Alcibiades  from  Apamea  in  Syria  who  in  his  time  brought 
to  Rome  a  book  supposed  to  contain  revelations  made  to  a 
holy  man,  Elchasai  or  Helxai,  by  an  angel  ninety-six  miles 
in  height  and  from  sixteen  to  twenty-four  miles  in  breadth 
and  leaving  a  footprint  fourteen  miles  long.  This  angel 
was  the  Son  of  God,  and  was  accompanied  by  a  female  of 
corresponding  size  who  was  the  Holy  Spirit.  This  appari- 
tion and  revelation  was  accompanied  by  a  preaching  of  a 
new  remission  of  sins  in  the  third  year  of  Trajan's  reign, 
at  which  time  we  are  led  to  suppose  that  the  Book  of  Helxai 


*  Irenaeus,  I,  25 ;  Hippolytus, 
VII,  20;  Epiphanius,  ed.  Dindorf, 
II,  64. 

^Irenaeus,  I,  24;  Epiphanius,  ed. 


Dindorf,  II,  27-8. 

^  Hippolytus,  VII,  14-15. 

*The  more  correct  title  for  the 
Philosophumena,  see  IX,  8-12. 


AV  THti  GIJSTICS  373 

came  into  existence.  It  imposed  secrecy  upon  those  initiated 
into  its  mysteries.  The  sect,  according  to  Hippolytus,  were 
much  given  to  magic,  astrology,  and  the  number  mysticism 
of  Pythagoras.  The  Elchasaites  employed  incantations  and 
formulae  to  cure  persons  bitten  by  mad  dogs  or  afflicted  with 
disease.  In  such  cases  and  also  in  the  case  of  rebaptism  for 
the  remission  of  sins  it  was  customary  with  them  to  invoke 
or  adjure  "seven  witnesses,"  not  however  in  this  case  the 
planets,  but  "the  heaven,  and  the  water,  and  the  holy  spirits, 
and  the  angels  of  prayer,  and  the  oil  (or,  the  olive),  and 
the  salt,  and  the  earth."  Hippolytus  declares  that  their 
formulae  of  this  sort  were  "very  numerous  and  very  ridic- 
ulous." They  dipped  consumptives  and  persons  possessed 
by  demons  in  cold  water  forty  times  in  seven  days.  They 
believed  in  the  astrological  doctrine  of  elections,  since  their 
sacred  book  warned  them  not  to  baptize  or  begin  other  im- 
portant undertakings  upon  those  days  which  were  governed 
by  the  evil  stars.  They  also  seem  to  have  predicted  political 
events  from  the  stars,  foretelling  that  three  years  after 
Trajan's  subjugation  of  the  Parthians  "war  rages  between 
the  impious  angels  of  the  northern  (constellations),  and  on 
this   account  all  kingdoms  of   impiety  are  in  confusion." 

In  the  next  century  Epiphanius  adds  one  or  two  further  Epipha- 
details  to  Hippolytus'  account  of  the  Elchasaites.     Besides   g^cha-^^^ 
the  list  of  seven  witnesses  already  given  he  mentions  another  saites. 
slightly   different   one:   salt,   water,   earth,   wheat,   heaven, 
ether,  and  wind.     He  also  tells  of  two  sisters  in  the  time 
of  Constantine  who  were  supposed  to  be  descendants  of 
Helxai.     One  of  them  was  still  alive  the  last  Epiphanius 
knew,  and  crowds  followed  "this  witch"  to  collect  the  dust 
of  her  footprints  or  her  spittle  to  use  in  curing  diseases.^ 

We  possess  an  important  document  for  the  attitude  of  The  Book  o) 

early  Christianity  and  Gnosticism  towards  astrology  in  The  ^Countries 

Dialogue  concerning  Fate  or   The  Book  of  the  Laws  of 

Countries   of    Bardesanes    or    Bardaisan.-     The    complete 

^Dindorf,  II,  log-io,  507-9.  Haase,  Zur  hardesanischen  Gnosis, 

'A.      Merx,      Bardesanes     der      Leipzig,  1910,  in  TU,  XXIV,  4. 
letste   Gnostiker,   Jena,    1864.      F. 


374  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

Syriac  text  is  extant ;  ^  there  is  a  long  and  somewhat  modi- 
fied extract  adopted  from  it  in  the  Latin  Recognitions  of 
Clement,^  and  briefer  fragments  in  the  Greek  fathers. 
Strictly  speaking,  the  text  seems  to  be  written  by  some  fol- 
lower of  Bardesanes  named  Philip  who  represents  his  master 
as  discussing  the  problem  of  human  free  will  with  Avida, 
himself,  and  other  disciples.  The  bulk  of  the  treatise  is  in 
any  case  put  in  Bardesanes'  mouth  and  it  probably  reflects 
his  views  with  fair  accuracy.  Eusebius  ascribed  it  to  Barde- 
sanes himself. 
Person-  Bardesanes  (154-222  A.  D.)  was  born  in  Edessa.     He 

Barde-         Spent  most  of  his  life  in  Mesopotamia  but  for  a  time  went  to 
sanes,  Armenia  as  a  missionary.     His  many  works  in  Syriac  in- 

cluded apologies  for  Christianity,  attacks  upon  heresies,  and 
numerous  hymns,  but  the  only  work  extant  is  the  treatise  we 
are  about  to  examine,  with  the  possible  exception  of  The 
Hymn  of  the  Soul  ^  ascribed  to  him  and  contained  in  the 
Syriac  Acts  of  St.  Thomas.  His  doctrines  were  regarded 
by  Ephraem  Syrus  and  others  as  tainted  with  Gnostic  heresy. 
He  is  often  represented  as  a  follower  of  Valentinus,  but  the 
ancient  authorities,  such  as  Epiphanius  and  Eusebius,  dis- 
agree as  to  whether  he  degenerated  from  orthodoxy  to 
Valentinianism  or  reformed  in  the  opposite  direction.  In 
the  dialogue  which  we  consider  he  is  represented  as  a 
Christian,  but  his  remarks  have  often  been  thought  to  have 
a  Gnostic  flavor.  F.  Nau,  however,  has  argued  that  he  was 
not  a  Gnostic  and  that  the  statements  in  question  in  the  dia- 
logue can  be  explained  as  purely  astrological.^ 
Sin  pos-  The  treatise  opens  with  the  query,  why  did  not  God 

men  ^°^      make  men  so  that  they  could  not  sin?    The  reply  of  course 
angels,         is  that  moral  freedom  for  good  or  evil  is  a  greater  gift  of 
God  than  compulsory  morality.    By  virtue  of  his  individual 
freedom  of  action  man  is  equal  to  the  angels,  some  of  whom, 

*  English     translation     in     AN,  Bevan,  1897;  F.  C.  Burkett,  1899; 

VIII,  723-34.  G.  R.  S.  Mead,  1906. 

"Recognitions,   IX,    17   and    19-  *  F.    Nau,    Une    biographic   ine- 

2Q.  dite     de    Bardesane     I'astrologue, 

'English  translations  by  A.   A.  1897. 


XV  THE  GNOSTICS  375 

too,  have  sinned  v^^ith  the  daughters  of  men  and  fallen,  and 
is  superior  even  to  the  sun,  moon,  and  signs  of  the  zodiac 
v^hich  are  fixed  in  their  courses.  The  stars,  hov^ever,  as  in 
The  Book  of  Enoch,  "are  not  absolutely  destitute  of  all 
freedom"  and  will  be  held  responsible  at  the  day  of  judg- 
ment.   Presently  some  of  them  are  called  evil. 

After  some  discussion  v^hether  man  does  wrong  from  Does  fate 
his  nature,  the  treatise  turns  to  the  question,  how  far  are  a^troLgi- 

men  controlled  by  fate,  that  is,  by  the  power  of  the  seven   cal  sense 
.  .  prevail? 

planets  m  accordance  with  the  doctrine  of  the  Chaldeans, 

which  is  the  term  here  usually  employed  for  astrologers. 
Some  men  attack  astrology  as  "a  lying  invention"  and  hold 
that  the  human  will  is  free  and  that  such  evils  as  man  can- 
not avoid  are  due  to  chance  or  to  divine  punishment  but  not 
to  the  stars.  Between  these  extremes  Bardesanes  takes  mid- 
dle ground.  He  believes  that  there  is  such  a  force  in  the 
stars,  whom  he  refers  to  as  Potentates  and  Governors,  as  the 
fate  of  which  the  astrologers  speak,  but  that  this  fate  evi- 
dently does  not  rule  everything,  since  it  is  itself  established 
by  the  one  God  who  imposed  upon  the  stars  and  elements 
that  motion  in  conformity  with  which  "intelligences  under- 
go change  when  they  descend  to  the  soul,  and  souls  under- 
go change  when  they  descend  to  bodies,"  a  statement  which 
appears  to  have  a  Gnostic  flavor.  This  fate  furthermore 
is  limited  by  nature  on  the  one  hand  and  human  free  ^yill 
on  the  other  hand.  The  vital  processes  and  periods  which 
are  common  to  all  men,  such  as  birth,  generation,  child- 
bearing,  eating,  drinking,  old  age,  and  death,  Bardesanes 
regards  as  governed  by  nature.  "The  body,"  he  says,  "is 
neither  hindered  nor  helped  by  fate  in  the  several  acts  it 
performs,"  a  view  which  most  astrologers  would  probably 
not  accept.  On  the  contrary,  in  Bardesanes'  opinion  wealth 
and  honors,  power  and  subjection,  sickness  and  health,  are 
controlled  by  fate  which  often  disturbs  the  regular  course 
of  nature.  This  is  because  in  genesis  or  the  nativity  the 
stars,  some  of  which  work  with  and  some  against  nature, 


Z7^  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

are  in  conflict.     In  short,  some  stars  are  good  and  some  are 
evil. 
National  If  nature  is  thus  often  upset  by  the  stars,  fate  in  its 

customs  as  ^^^^  "^^^  ^^  resisted  and  overpowered  by  man's  exercise  of 
a  proof  will.  This  assertion  Bardesanes  proceeds  to  prove  by  the 
will.  argument  which  has  given  to  the  dialogue  the  title.  The  Book 

of  the  Laws  of  the  Countries,  and  which  we  find  much  re- 
peated in  subsequent  writers.  Briefly  it  is  that  in  various 
nations  certain  laws  are  enforced  upon,  or  customs  ob- 
served by  all  the  people  alike  regardless  of  their  diverse 
individual  horoscopes.  In  illustration  of  this  are  listed  va- 
rious prohibitions  and  practices  fondly  supposed  by  Barde- 
sanes and  his  audience  to  characterize  the  Seres,  Brahmans, 
Persians,  Geli,  Bactrians,  Arabs,  Britons,  Parthians,  Ama- 
zons, and  other  peoples.  Savage  tribes  are  mentioned  among 
whom  there  are  no  artists,  bankers,  perfumers,  musicians, 
and  poets  to  fit  the  nativities  decreed  by  the  constellations  for 
certain  times.  Bardesanes  is  aware  of  the  astrological  the- 
ory of  seven  zones  or  climes,  by  which  the  science  of  individ- 
ual horoscopes  is  corrected  and  modified,  but  he  contends 
that  there  are  many  different  laws  in  each  of  these  zones, 
and  would  be,  even  if  the  number  were  raised  to  twelve  ac- 
cording to  the  number  of  the  signs  or  to  thirty-six  after 
the  decans.  He  also  contends  that  men  retain  their  laws 
or  customs  when  they  migrate  to  other  climes,  and  adduces 
the  fidelity  of  Jews  and  Christians  to  the  commandments 
of  their  respective  religions  as  a  further  illustration  of  the 
triumph  of  free  will  over  the  stars.  He  concedes,  how- 
ever, as  before  that  "in  every  country  and  in  every  nation 
there  are  rich  and  poor,  and  rulers  and  subjects,  and  peo- 
ple in  health  and  those  who  are  sick,  each  one  according  as 
fate  and  his  nativity  have  affected  him."  Incidentally  to 
the  foregoing  discussion  it  is  affirmed  that  the  astrology  of 
Egypt  and  that  of  the  Chaldeans  in  Babylon  are  identical. 
At  the  close  of  the  treatise  is  appended  a  note  stating  that 
Bardesanes  estimated  the  duration  of  the  world  at  six 
thousand  years  on  the  basis  of  sixty  as  the  least  number  of 


XV  THE  GNOSTICS  2>77 

years  in  which  the  seven  planets  complete  an  even  number 
of  revolutions. 

If   the  work   ascribed   to   Bardesanes    is   not    certainly  The 

Pistis- 

Gnostic,  the  Pistis-Sophia  is,  and  we  turn  next  to  it  and  first  Sophia: 

of  all  to  its  attitude  towards  astroloe^y.     This  treatise  is   attitude  to 

.  astrology, 

extant  in  a  Coptic  codex  of  the  fifth  or  sixth  century;  ^  the 

Greek  original  text  was  probably  written  in  the  second  half 
of  the  third  century.  It  gives  the  revelations  made  by  Jesus 
to  his  disciples  after  He  had  ascended  to  heaven  and  re- 
turned again  to  them.  When  He  ascended  through  the  heav- 
ens, He  changed  the  fatal  influence  of  the  lords  of  the 
spheres  and  made  the  planets  turn  to  the  right  for  six 
months  of  the  year,  whereas  before  they  had  faced  the  left 
continually."  In  a  long  passage  near  the  close  of  the  Pistis- 
Sophia  proper  ^  Jesus  asserts  the  absolute  control  of  human 
destiny  hitherto  by  "the  rulers  of  the  fate"  and  describes 
how  they  fashion  the  new  soul,  control  the  process  of  gen- 
eration and  of  the  formation  of  the  child  in  the  womb,  and 
decree  every  event  of  life  down  to  the  day  and  manner  of 
death.  Only  by  the  Gnostic  key  to  the  mysteries  can  one 
escape  their  control.^  In  the  following  Book  of  the  Saviour, 
moreover,  even  the  finding  of  this  key  is  subjected  to  astral 
control,  since  a  constellation  is  described  under  which  all 
souls  descending  to  this  world  will  be  just  and  good  and 
will  discover  the  mysteries  of  light.^ 

The  Pistis-Sophia  assumes  the  usual  attitude  of  con-   "Magic" 
demnation  of  magic  so-called.    Among  the  evils  which  Jesus   denined. 
warns  his  followers  to  renounce  are  superstition  and  invo- 
cations and  drugs  or  magic  potions.^     One  object  of  his  re- 
ducing by  one-third  the  power  of  the  lords  of  the  spheres 
when  He  ascended  through  the  heavens  was  that  men  might 
not  henceforth  invoke  them  by  magic  rites   for  evil  pur- 
eed. Coptic  and  Latin  by  M.  G.       manuscript  occurs  the  Book  of  the 
Schwartze  and  J.   H.   Petermann,      Saviour   of    which    we   shall   also 
1851 ;    French    translation    by    E.      treat. 
Amelineau,  1895;  English  by  G.  R.  ^Pistis-Sophia,  25-6. 

S.    Mead,    1896;    German    by    C.  'Ibid.,  336-50. 

Schmidt,  1905.    The  Coptic  text  is  *  Ibid.,  355,  et  seq. 

thickly    interspersed    with    Greek  ^  Ibid.,  389-90. 

words  and  phrases.     In  the  same  "Ibid.,  255  and  258, 


378 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Power 
of  names 
and  rites. 


Interest 
in  natural 
science. 


poses.  Marvels  may  still,  however,  be  accomplished  by 
"those  who  know  the  mysteries  of  the  magic  of  the  thirteenth 
aeon"  or  power  above  the  spheres.^ 

But  while  magic  is  renounced,  great  faith  is  shown  in 
the  power  of  names  and  rites.  Thus  after  a  description  of 
the  dragon  of  outer  darkness  and  the  twelve  main  dungeons 
into  which  it  divides  and  the  animal  faces  and  names  of 
the  twelve  rulers  thereof,  who  evidently  represent  in  an  in- 
accurate fashion  the  signs  of  the  zodiac,  it  is  added  that 
even  unrepentant  sinners,  if  they  know  the  mystery  of  any 
one  of  these  twelve  names,  can  escape  from  these  dungeons.^ 
In  the  Book  of  the  Saviour  Jesus  not  only  utters  several 
long  lists  of  strange  and  presumably  magic  words  by  way 
of  invocation  to  the  Power  or  powers  above,  but  these  are 
accompanied  by  careful  observance  of  ceremonial.  On  both 
occasions  Jesus  and  the  disciples  are  clad  in  linen.^  In  the 
first  case  the  disciples  are  carefully  grouped  with  reference 
to  the  points  of  the  compass,  towards  which  Jesus  turns  suc- 
cessively as  He  utters  the  magic  words  standing  at  a  sacri- 
ficial altar.  The  result  of  this  ceremony  and  invocation  was 
that  the  heavens  were  displaced  and  the  earth  left  behind 
and  that  Jesus  and  the  disciples  found  themselves  in  the 
region  of  mid-air.  Before  uttering  the  other  invocation 
Jesus  commanded  that  fire  and  vine  branches  be  brought, 
placed  an  offering  on  the  flame,  and  carefully  arranged  two 
vessels  of  wine,  two  cups  of  water,  and  as  many  pieces  of 
bread  as  there  were  disciples.  In  this  case  the  object  was 
to  remit  the  sins  of  the  disciples.  In  the  Book  of  Jeu  in 
the  Bruce  Papyrus  there  is  a  perfect  riot  of  such  magic 
names  and  invocations,  seals  and  diagrams,  and  accompany- 
ing ceremonial.* 

The  interest  of  the  Gnostics  in  natural  science  is  seen  in 
the  list  of  things  that  will  be  known  by  one  who  has  pene- 

^  Pistis-Sophia,  29-30.  692  pp.,  in  TU,  VIII,  2,  with  Ger- 

'  Ibid.,  319-35.  man  translation  of  the  Coptic  text 

*  Ibid.,  357-8,  375-6.  at  pp.  142-223.    Portions  have  been 

*  Carl  Schmidt,  Gnostische  translated  into  English  by  G.  R. 
Schrifte  in  koptischer  Sprache  S.  Mead,  Fragments  of  a  Faith 
aus   dem   codex  Brucianus,    1892,  Forgotten,  1900. 


XV  THE  GNOSTICS  379 

trated  all  the  mysteries  and  fully  entered  upon  the  inheri- 
tance of  the  kingdom  of  light.  Not  only  will  he  understand 
why  there  is  light  and  darkness,  and  why  sin  and  vice  exist 
and  life  and  death,  but  also  why  there  are  reptiles  and  wild 
beasts  and  why  they  shall  be  destroyed,  why  there  are  birds 
and  beasts  of  burden,  why  there  are  gems  and  precious 
metals,  why  there  are  brass,  iron  and  steel,  lead,  glass,  wax, 
herbs,  waters,  "and  why  the  wild  denizens  of  the  sea."  Why 
there  are  four  points  of  the  compass,  why  demons  and  men, 
why  heat  and  cold,  stars,  winds,  and  clouds,  frost,  snow, 
planets,  aeons,  decans,  and  so  on  and  so  forth.^ 

King  has  shown  that  many  of  the  so-called  "Gnostic  "Gnostic 
gems"  are  purely  astrological  talismans  and  that  "only  a  fstrology, 
very  small  minority  amidst  their  multitude  present  any 
traces  of  the  influence  of  Christian  doctrines."  ^  Many  are 
for  medicinal  or  magical  purposes  rather  than  of  a  religious 
character.  Some  nevertheless  are  engraved  with  the  truly 
Gnostic  figure  of  Pantheus  Abraxas  which  King  regards  as 
"the  actual  invention  of  Basilides."  Another  common  sym- 
bol, borrowed  from  Egypt,  is  the  Agathodaemon,  which  by 
the  third  century  had  become  the  popular  designation  of  the 
hooded  snake  of  Egypt,  or  Chnuphis  or  Chneph,  a  great 
serpent  with  a  lion's  head  encircled  by  a  crown  of  seven 
or  twelve  rays,  representing  the  planets  or  signs.  Often  the 
seven  Greek  vowels  are  placed  at  the  tips  of  the  seven  rays. 
On  the  obverse  of  the  gem  the  letter  "s"  is  engraved  thrice 
and  traversed  by  a  straight  rod,  a  design  probably  meant 
to  depict  a  snake  twisting  about  a  wand.  We  are  reminded, 
not  only  with  King  of  the  club  of  Aesculapius,  but  of 
Aaron's  rod,  the  magicians  of  Pharaoh,  and  the  serpent 
lifted  up  in  the  wilderness;  also  of  Lucian's  tale  of  the  pre- 
tended discovery  of  the  god  Asclepius  by  the  pseudo- 
prophet,  Alexander.  At  least  one  "Gnostic  amulet"  has  on 
the  back  the  legend  "lao  Sabao"  (th).^ 

^  Pistis-Sophia,  205-15.  Precious  Stones  and  Gems,  Lon- 

'  C.  W.  King,  The  Gnostics  and  don,  1865. 
their     Remains,     1887,     pp.     xvi-  ^  A.  B.  Cook,  Zeus,  p.  235,  citing 

xviii,  215-8.    Also  his  The  Natural  J.   Spon,  Miscellanea  eruditae  an- 

History,  Ancient  and  Modern,  of  tiquitatis,  Lyons,  1685,  p.  297. 


38o 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 


^AP. 


The 
planets 
in  early 
Christian 
art. 


Gnostic 
amulets 
in  Spain. 


Syriac 

Christian 

charms. 


The  influence  of  astrology  may  be  seen  in  other  and 
more  certainly  genuine  works  of  early  Christian  art  than 
many  of  the  so-called  Gnostic  gems.  On  a  lamp  in  the 
catacombs  Christ  is  depicted  as  the  good  shepherd  with  a 
lamb  on  His  shoulder.  Above  His  head  are  the  seven  planets, 
although  the  sun  and  moon  are  shown  again  at  either  side, 
and  about  His  feet  press  seven  lambs,  perhaps  an  indication 
that  He  is  freeing  the  peoples  of  the  seven  climes  from  the 
fatal  influence  of  the  stars.  In  the  Poemander  attributed  to 
Hermes  it  is  stated  that  there  are  seven  peoples  from  the 
seven  planets.  On  a  gem  of  perhaps  the  third  century  a 
similar  scene  is  engraved  except  that  the  sun  and  moon  are 
not  shown  apart  from  the  seven  planets,  and  that  the  lamb  on 
Christ's  shoulders  is  counted  as  one  of  the  seven,  so  that 
there  are  but  six  at  His  feet.^ 

"Gnostic  amulets  and  other  works  of  art"  are  occasion- 
ally found  in  Spain,  especially  the  Asturian  northwest  which 
remained  Christian  at  the  time  of  the  Mohammedan  con- 
quest of  the  rest  of  the  peninsula.  One  ring  is  inscribed  with 
the  sentence,  "Zeus,  Serapis,  and  lao  are  one."  On  another 
octagonal  ring  are  Greek  letters  signifying  the  Gnostic 
Anthropos  or  father  of  wisdom.  A  stone  is  carved  with  a 
candelabrum  and  the  seven  planets,  "the  sacred  hebdomad 
of  the  Chaldeans."  ^ 

Gollancz  in  his  Selection  of  Charms  from  Syriac  Manu- 
scripts presents  a  number  of  spells  and  incantations  which, 
whether  any  of  them  are  Gnostic  or  not,  certainly  seem  to 
be  Christian,  since  they  mention  the  divine  persons  of  Chris- 
tianity, Mary,  and  various  Biblical  characters.^ 

At  the  close  of  the  fourth  century  the  views  of  the  Gnos- 
tics were  revived  in  Gaul  and  Spain  by  Priscillian,  who 


Reitzenstein,  Poimandres,  pp. 
1 1 1-3.  On  the  planets  in  later 
medieval  art  see  Fuchs,  Die 
Ikonographie  dcr  7  Plancten  in 
der  Kunst  Italiens  bis  sum  Aus- 
gange  des  Mittelalters,  Munich, 
1909. 


*  E.  S.  Bouchier,  Spain  under 
the  Roman  Empire,  p.  125. 

'  Hermann  Gollancz,  Selection 
of  Charms  from  Syriac  Manu- 
scripts, 1898;  also  pp.  77-97  in 
Acts  of  International  Congress  of 
Orientalists,  Sept.,  1897;  Syriac 
text  and  English  translation. 


XV  THE  GNOSTICS  381 

seems  to  have  been  much  influenced  by  astrology  and  who  Pnscillian 
w^as  put  to  death  at  Treves  in  385  A.  D.  on  a  charge  of  magic,  for  magic. 
He  confessed  under  torture,  but  w^as  afterwards  thought 
innocent.  We  are  not  told,  however,  what  the  magical  prac- 
tices were  of  which  he  was  accused.^  Both  Sulpicius  Sev- 
erus  and  Isidore  of  Seville  ^  state  that  he  was  accused  of 
maleilcmm,  which  should  mean  witchcraft,  sorcery,  or  mag- 
ical operations  with  the  intent  to  injure  someone.  But  fur- 
ther details  are  wanting,  except  that  Sulpicius  calls  Pris- 
cillian  a  man  "more  pufifed  up  than  was  right  with  the 
knowledge  of  profane  things,  and  who  was  further  believed 
to  have  practiced  magic  arts  since  adolescence,"  while  Isi- 
dore states  that  Bishop  Itacius  (Ithaicus),  who  was  largely 
responsible  for  pushing  the  charges  against  Priscillian, 
showed  in  a  book  which  he  wrote  against  Priscillian's 
heresy  that  "a  certain  Marcus  of  Memphis,  most  learned 
in  magic  art,  was  a  disciple  of  Mani  and  master  of  Pris- 
cillian." Priscillian  himself  states  in  his  extant  works  that 
Itacius  had  accused  him  of  magic  in  380.  As  the  final  trial 
proceeded,  Itacius  gave  way  as  accuser  to  a  public  prosecutor 
{Hsci  patronus)  who  continued  the  case  on  behalf  of  the 
emperor  Maximus  who  seems  to  have  had  his  eye  upon 
Priscillian's  large  fortune.  St.  Martin  of  Tours  in  vain 
obtained  from  Maximus  a  promise  that  Priscillian  should 
not  be  put  to  death. ^  But  his  execution  brought  his  per- 
secutor Itacius  into  such  bad  odor  that  he  was  excommuni- 
cated and  condemned  to  exile  for  the  rest  of  his  life. 

We  have  just  heard  that  Priscillian  was  taught  by  a  dis-  Manichean 
ciple  of  Mani,  while  Ephraem  Syrus  states  that  Bardesanes  ^^^""scnpts, 

^  In    1885-1886   eleven    tracts   by  Etudes,   Fasc.    169),   which   super- 

Priscillian  were  discovered  by  G.  sedes  the  earlier  works  of  Paret, 

Schepss  in  a  Wiirzburg  MS.  They  1891 ;   Dierich,    1897;   and   Edling, 

shed,  however,  little  light  upon  the  1902. 

question  whether  he  was  addicted  ^  Sulpicii  Severi  Historia  Sacra, 

to   magic.     They  have  been  pub-  II,  46-51   (Migne,  PL,  XX,  155,  et 

lished  in  Priscilliani  quae  super-  seq.)       S.       Isidori       Hispalensis 

sunt.,   etc.,    ed.    G.    Schepss,    1889,  Episcopi,  De  viris  itlustrihus.  Cap. 

in  CSEL,  XVIII.  15   (Migne,  PL,  LXXXIII,  1092). 

See    also    E.    Ch.    Babut,    Pris-  '  Realencyklopddie     fur    protes- 

cillien  et  la  Priscillienisnie,  Paris,  tantische  Theologie,  XVI,  63. 
1909    {Bibl.    d.    l'£cole  d.   Haute s 


382  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

was  the  teacher  of  Mani.  Augustine  in  his  youth,  when  a 
follower  of  the  Manicheans,  had  been  devoted  to  astrology. 
This  connection  between  Gnosticism  and  astrology  and 
Manicheism  has  been  further  attested  by  the  fragments  of 
Manichean  manuscripts  recently  discovered  in  central  Asia.* 
In  them  the  sun-god  and  moon-god  and  five  other  planets 
play  a  prominent  part.  Besides  the  five  planets  we  have  five 
elements — ether,  wind,  light,  fire,  and  water — five  plants, 
five  trees,  and  five  beings  with  souls — man,  quadrupeds,  rep- 
tiles, aquatic,  and  flying  animals.  The  five  gods  or  luminous 
bodies  are  represented  as  good  forces  who  imprisoned  five 
kinds  of  demons ;  but  the  devil  had  his  revenge  by  imprison- 
ing luminous  forces  in  man,  whom  he  made  a  microcosm  of 
the  universe.  /  nd  whereas  the  good  spirit  had  created  sun 
and  moon,  the  devil  formed  male  and  female.  The  great 
sage  of  beneficent  light  then  appeared  in  the  world  and 
brought  forth  from  his  own  five  members  five  liberators — 
pity,  contentment,  patience,  wisdom,  and  good  faith — corre- 
sponding to  the  five  elements  just  as  among  the  Christians 
we  shall  find  four  virtues  and  four  elements.  Then  ensued 
the  struggle  of  the  old  man  with  the  new  man.  Although 
we  are  commonly  told  that  idolatry  and  magic  were  strictly 
prohibited  by  the  Manicheans,  the  envoy  of  light  is  in  one 
text  represented  as  "employing  great  magic  prayers"  in  his 
effort  to  deliver  living  beings.  When  men  eat  living  beings, 
they  offend  against  the  five  gods,  the  earth  dry  and  moist, 
the  five  orders  of  animate  beings,  the  five  different  herbs 
and  five  trees.  Other  numbers  than  five  appear  in  these 
Manichean  fragments :  four  seals  of  light  and  four  praises, 
four  courts  with  iron  barriers;  three  vestments  and  three 
wheels  and  three  calamities;  ten  vows  and  ten  layers  of 
heavens  above,  and  eight  layers  of  earth  beneath;  twelve 

*  My  following  statements  in  the  astuanift,  Das  Bussgebet  der  Mani- 

text  are  based  upon  E.  Chavannes  chder,   Petrograd,   1909;   A.  v.  Le 

et  P.  Pelliot,  Un  traite  manicheen  Coq,  Chuastuanift,  ein  Sundenbe- 

retrouve  en  Chine,  1913, — they  date  kenntnis   der    Manichaischen   Au- 

the  Chinese  translation  about  900  ditores,    Berlin,    1911.      There   are 

A.D.  and  the  MS  of  it  within  a  further  publications  on  the  subject, 
century    later;    W.    Radloflf,    Chu- 


XV  THE  GNOSTICS  383 

great  kings  and  twelve  evil  natures ;  thirteen  great  luminous 
forces  and  thirteen  parts  of  the  carnal  body  and  thirteen 
vices, — elsewhere  fourteen  parts;  fifteen  enumerations  of 
sins  for  which  forgiveness  is  sought;  fifty  days  in  the  year 
to  be  observed;  and  so  on. 

A  sect  derived  either  from  Gnosticism  or  from  common  The  Man- 
sources  seems  still  to  exist  in  the  case  of  the  Mandaeans  of  ^^^"^• 
southern  Babylonia.^  They  believe  that  the  earth  and  man 
were  formed  by  a  Demiurge,  who  corresponds  to  the  lalda- 
baoth  of  the  Ophites,  and  who  was  aided  by  the  spirits  of 
the  seven  planets.  They  divide  the  history  of  the  world 
into  seven  ages  and  represent  Jesus  Christ  as  a  false  prophet 
and  magician  produced  by  the  planet  Mercury.  The  lower 
world  consists  of  four  vestibules  and  three  hells  proper  and 
has  seven  iron  and  seven  golden  walls.  A  dying  Mandaean 
is  clothed  in  a  holy  dress  of  seven  pieces.  The  spirits  of 
the  planets,  however,  are  represented  as  evil  beings,  and  the 
first  two  of  three  sets  of  progeny  borne  by  the  spirit  of  hell 
fire  were  the  seven  planets  and  the  twelve  signs  of  the  zodiac. 
The  influence  of  these  two  numbers,  seven  and  twelve,  may 
be  further  seen  in  the  regulation  that  a  candidate  for  the 
priesthood  should  be  at  least  nineteen  years  old  and  have 
had  twelve  years  of  previous  training,  which  we  infer  would 
normally  begin  when  he  reached  his  seventh  year  and  not 
before.  Other  prominent  numbers  in  Mandaean  lore  are 
five,^  perhaps  indicative  of  the  planets  other  than  sun  and 
moon,  and  three  hundred  and  sixty,  suggestive  of  the  num- 
ber of  degrees  in  the  circle  of  the  zodiac.  Thus  the  main 
manifestations  of  the  primal  light  are  five,  and  the  third 
generation  produced  by  the  spirit  of  hell  fire  was  of  like 
number.  The  number  of  aeons  is  often  stated  as  three  hun- 
dred and  sixty,  and  the  delivering  deity  or  Messiah  of  the 

*The  following  details  are  from  Anz  (1897),  pp.  70-8.  Fur- 
drawn  from  the  articles  on  the  ther  bibliography  will  be  found  in 
Mandaeans  in  EB,  nth  edition,  by  these  references. 
K.  Kessler  and  G.  W.  Thatcher,  '  The  number  five  also  appears 
and  in  ERE  by  W.  Brandt,  author  in  the  Pistis-Sophia  and  other 
of  Manddische  Religion,  1889,  and  Gnostic  literature. 
Manddische   Schriften,    1893,   and 


384  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE  chap.xv 

Mandaeans  is  said  to  have  sent  forth  that  number  of  dis- 
ciples before  his  return  to  the  realm  of  light.  We  hear  of 
yet  other  numbers,  such  as  480,000  years  for  the  duration 
of  the  world,  60,000,  and  240,  but  these  too  are  commen- 
surate, if  not  identical,  with  astrological  periods  such  as 
those  of  conjunctions  and  the  magnus  annus.  A  peculiarity 
of  Mandaean  astronomy  and  astrology  is  that  the  other 
heavenly  bodies  are  all  believed  to  rotate  about  the  polar 
star.  Mandaeans  always  face  it  when  praying;  their  sanc- 
tuaries are  built  so  that  persons  entering  face  it;  and  even 
the  dying  man  is  placed  so  that  his  feet  point  and  eyes  gaze 
in  its  direction.  Like  the  Gnostics,  the  Mandaeans  invoke 
by  many  strange  names  their  spirits  and  aeons  who  are 
divided  into  numerous  orders.  Their  names  for  the  planets 
seem  to  be  of  Babylonian  origin.  Passages  from  their  sa- 
cred books  are  recited  like  incantations  and  are  considered 
more  effective  in  danger  and  distress  than  prayer  in  the 
ordinary  sense  of  the  word.  Such  recitations  are  also  em- 
ployed to  aid  the  souls  of  the  dead  to  ascend  through  vari- 
ous stages  or  prisons  to  the  world  of  light.  Earthenware 
vessels  have  recently  been  brought  to  light  with  Mandaean 
inscriptions  and  incantations  to  avert  evil.-^ 

^  H.    Pognon,    Une    Incantation  ddische  Zaubertexte,  in  Ephemeris 

centre    les   genies    malfaisants    en  f.  semit.  Epig.,  I    (1902),  89-106. 

Manddite,  1893;  Inscriptions  man-  J.   A.    Montgomery,   Aramaic   In- 

ddites    des    coupes    dc    Khonahir,  cantation     Texts     from     Nippur, 

1897-1899.    M.    Lidzbarski,    Man-  1913. 


CHAPTER  XVI 

THE  CHRISTIAN  APOCRYPHA 

Magic  in  the  Bible — Apocryphal  Gospels  of  the  Infancy — Question 
of  their  date — Their  medieval  influence — Resemblances  to  Apuleius  and 
Apollonius  in  the  Arabic  Gospel  of  the  Infancy — Counteracting  magic 
and  demons — Other  miracles  and  magic  by  the  Christ  child — Some- 
times with  injurious  results — Further  marvels  from  the  Pseudo- 
Matthew — Learning  of  the  Christ  child — Other  charges  of  magic  against 
Christ  and  the  apostles — The  Magi  and  the  star — Allegorical  zoology  of 
Barnabas — Traces  of  Gnosticism  in  the  apocryphal  Acts — Legend  of 
St.  John — Legend  of  St.  Sousnyos — Old  Testament  Apocrypha  of  the 
Christian  era. 

It  is  hardly  necessary  to  rehearse  here  in  detail  the  nu-  Magic  in 
merous  allusions  to,  prohibitions  of,  and  descriptions  of  the  ^  '  ^' 
practice  of  magic,  witchcraft,  and  astrology,  enchantments 
and  exorcisms,  divination  and  interpretation  of  dreams, 
which  are  to  be  found  scattered  through  the  pages  of  the 
Old  and  New  Testaments.  Such  passages  had  a  profound 
influence  upon  Christian  thought  on  such  themes  in  the  early 
church  and  during  the  middle  ages,  and  we  shall  have  occa- 
sion to  mention  many,  if  not  most,  of  such  scriptural  pas- 
sages, in  connection  with  this  later  discussion  of  them  by 
the  church  fathers  and  others.  For  instance,  Pharaoh's  ma- 
gicians and  their  contests  with  Moses  and  Aaron;  Balaam 
and  his  imprecations  and  enchantments  and  prediction  that 
a  star  would  come  out  of  Jacob  and  a  scepter  out  of  Israel; 
the  witch  of  Endor  or  ventriloquist  and  her  invocation  of 
what  seemed  to  be  the  ghost  of  Samuel ;  the  repeated  use  of 
the  numbers  seven  and  twelve,  suggestive  of  the  planets  and 
signs  of  the  zodiac,  as  in  the  twelve  cakes  of  showbread 
and  candlestick  with  seven  branches;  the  dreams  and  inter- 
pretation of  dreams  of  Joseph  and  Daniel,  not  to  mention 

385 


386  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

the  former's  silver  divining  cup ;  ^  the  wise  men  who  saw 
Christ's  star  in  the  east;  Christ's  own  allusion  to  the  shak- 
ing of  "the  powers  of  the  heavens"  and  the  gathering  of  His 
elect  from  the  four  winds  at  His  second  coming ;  the  accusa- 
tion against  Christ  that  He  cast  out  demons  by  the  aid  of  the 
prince  of  demons;  the  eclipse  of  the  sun  at  the  time  of  the 
crucifixion ;  the  adventures  of  the  apostles  with  Simon  Ma- 
gus, with  Elymas  the  sorcerer,  and  with  the  damsel  pos- 
sessed with  a  spirit  of  divination  who  brought  her  mastei 
much  gain  by  soothsaying;  the  burning  of  their  books  of 
magic  by  the  vagabond  Jewish  exorcists ;  the  prohibitions  of 
heathen  divination  and  witchcraft  by  the  Mosaic  law  and 
by  the  prophets;  the  penalties  prescribed  for  sorcerers  in 
the  Book  of  Revelation ;  at  the  same  time  the  legalized  prac- 
tice of  similar  superstitions,  such  as  the  ordeal  to  test  a 
wife's  faithfulness  by  making  her  drink  "the  bitter  water 
that  causeth  the  curse,"  ^  the  engraved  gold  plate  upon  the 
high  priest's  forehead,^  or  the  use  of  Paul's  handkerchief 
and  underwear  to  cure  the  sick  and  dispel  demons ;  the  prom- 
ise to  believers  in  the  closing  verses  or  appendix  of  The  Gos- 
pel according  to  St.  Mark  that  they  shall  cast  out  devils, 
speak  with  new  tongues,  handle  serpents  and  drink  poison 
without  injury,  and  cure  the  sick  by  laying  on  of  hands. 
The  foregoing  scarcely  exhaust  the  obvious  allusions  or 
analogies  to  astrology  and  other  magic  arts  in  the  Bible,  to 
say  nothing  of  less  explicit  passages  ^  which  were  later  taken 
to  justify  certain  occult  arts,  as  Exodus  XIH,  9,  to  support 
chiromancy,  and  the  Gospel  of  John  XI,  9,  to  support  the 
astrological  doctrine  of  elections.  Suffice  it  for  the  present 
to  say  that  the  prevailing  atmosphere  of  the  Bible  is  one  of 

*  Genesis  XLIV,  5,  and  J.  G.  and  also  his  other  works ;  for  in- 
Frazer  (1918),  II,  426-34.  stance,    The   Magic   Art,    191 1,    I, 

*  In  the  apocryphal  Protevan-  258,  for  the  contest  in  magic  rain- 
gelium  of  James,  cap.  16,  both  making  between  Elijah  and  the 
Joseph  and  Mary  undergo  the  priests  of  Baal  in  First  Kings, 
test.  Chapter    XVIII,    while    I    do    not 

*  Joachim  consults  the  plate  in  understand  why  Joshua  is  not 
the  Protevangelium,  cap.  5.  mentioned     in     connection     with 

*  See  J.  G.  Frazer,  Folk-Lore  in  "The  magical  control  of  the  sun," 
the  Old   Testament,   1918,  3  vols.,  Ibid.,  I,  3ii-i9- 


XVI  THE  CHRISTIAN  APOCRYPHA  387 

prophecy,  vision,  and  miracle,  and  that  with  these  go,  like 
the  obverse  face  of  a  coin  or  medal,  their  inevitable  accom- 
paniments of  divination,  demons,  and  magic. 

This  is  also  the  case  in  apocryphal  literature  of   the   Apoc- 
New  Testament  which  is  now  so  much  less  familiar  and  ac-  gospels 

cessible  especially  to  English  readers,^  but  which  had  wide  ?f  the 

.     .  .  infancy, 

currency  in  the  early  Christian  and  medieval  periods.     We 

may  begin  with  the  apocryphal  gospels  and  more  particu- 
larly those  dealing  with  the  infancy  and  childhood  of  Christ. 
Of  these  two  are  believed  to  date  from  the  second  century, 
namely,  the  Gospel  of  James  or  "Gospel  of  the  Infancy" 
{Protoevangeliiim  lacohi)  -  and  the  Gospel  of  St.  Thomas, 
which  is  mentioned  by  Hippolytus.  However,  he  cites  a 
sentence  which  is  not  in  the  present  text — of  which  the 
manuscripts  are  scanty  and  for  the  most  part  of  late  date  ^ — 
and  the  gospel  as  we  have  it  is  not  Gnostic,  as  he  says  it  is, 
so  that  our  version  has  probably  been  altered  by  some 
Catholic.^  Later  in  date  is  the  Latin  gospel  of  the  Pseudo- 
Matthew — perhaps  of  the  fourth  or  fifth  century — and  the 
Arabic  Gospel  of  the  Infancy,  which  is  believed  to  be  a 
translation  from  a  lost  Syriac  original.  We  are  the  worst 
off  of  all  for  manuscripts  of  its  text  and  apparently  there 
is  no  Latin  manuscript  of  it  now  extant,  although  a  Latin 

*  However,    the    Apocrypha    of  Tischendorf  is  Thilo,  Codex  apoc- 

the  New  Testament  may  be  read  ryphus  Novi  Testamenti,  Leipzig, 

in    English    translation    by    Alex-  1832;  Fabricius,  etc. 

ander  Walker  in  The  Ante-Nicene  'It    is    ascribed    to    the    second 

Fathers  (American  edition),  VIII,  century      both      by      Tischendorf 

357-598,  and   in   that  by  Hone   in  and     The     Catholic    Encyclopedia 

1820,    which    has    since    been    re-  ("Apocrypha,"    607).      There    are 

printed    without    change.      It    in-  plenty  of  fairly  early  Greek  MSS 

eludes   only   a   part   of   the   apoc-  for  it. 

rypha    now    known    and    presents  ^  The    Greek    MSS    are    of    the 

these  in  a  blind   fashion  without  15th  and  i6th  centuries ;  Tischen- 

explanation.  It  differs  from  Tisch-  dorf    examined    only    partially    a 

endorf's    text    of    the    apocryphal  Latin    palimpsest    of    it    which    is 

gospels  (Evangelia  Apocrypha,  ed.  probably  of  the  fifth  century. 

Tischendorf,    Lipsiae,    1876)    both  '  So  argues  The  Catholic  Ency- 

in   the   titles    of    the   gospels,   the  clopedia,  608;    Tischendorf   seems 

distribution  of  the  texts  under  the  inclined    to    date    the    Gospel    of 

respective  titles,  and  the  division  Thomas  a  little  later  than  that  of 

into   chapters.      I   have,   however,  James,  and  to  hold  that  we  pos- 

sometimes    used    Hone's    wording  sess  only  a  fragment  of  it. 
in  making  quotations.    Older  than 


388  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

text  has  reached  us  through  the  printed  editions.  Tischen- 
dorf  was,  however,  "unwilHng  to  omit  in  this  new  collec- 
tion of  the  apocryphal  gospels  that  ancient  and  memorable 
monument  of  the  superstition  of  oriental  Christians,"  and 
for  the  same  reason  we  shall  survey  its  medley  of  miracle 
and  magic  in  the  present  chapter.  Speaking  of  the  flight 
into  Egypt  this  gospel  says,  "And  the  Lord  Jesus  performed 
a  great  many  miracles  in  Egypt  which  are  not  found  recorded 
either  in  the  Gospel  of  the  Infancy  or  in  the  Perfect  Gos- 
pel." ^  Tischendorf  noted  the  close  resemblance  of  its  first 
nine  chapters  to  the  Gospel  of  James  and  of  chapters  36-55 
to  the  Gospel  of  Thomas,  while  the  intervening  chapters 
"contain  especially  fables  of  the  sort  you  may  fittingly  call 
oriental,  filled  with  allusions  to  Satan  and  demons  and 
sorceries  and  magic  arts."  ^  We  find,  however,  the  same  sort 
of  fables  in  the  other  three  apocryphal  gospels;  there  are 
simply  more  of  them  in  the  Arabic  Gospel  of  the  Infancy. 
It  appears  to  be  a  compilation  and  may  embody  other  earlier 
sources  no  longer  extant  as  well  as  passages  from  the  pseudo- 
James  and  pseudo-Thomas. 
Question  There  is  a  tendency  on  the  part  of  orthodox  Christian 

date.  scholars  to  defer  the  writing  of  apocryphal  works  to  as  late 

a  date  as  possible,  and  they  seem  to  have  a  notion  that  they 
can  save  the  credibility  or  purity  of  the  miracles  of  the 
New  Testament  ^  by  representing  such  miracles  as  those 
recorded  of  the  infancy  of  Christ  as  the  inventions  of  a  later 
age.  And  it  is  probably  true  that  all  these  marvels  were 
not  the  invention  of  a  single  century  but  of  a  succession  of 

*  Evang.    Inf.    Arab.,    cap.    25,  were  ready  enough  both  to  repeat 

"fecitque   dominus    lesus   plurima  and  to  invent  similar  tales, 
in  Egypto  miracula  quae  neque  in  ^  It  may  be  noted,  however,  that 

evangelic  infantiae  neque  in  evan-  the  chief  miracles  of  the  Gospels 

gelio  perfecto  scripta  reperiuntur.''  were  attacked  as  "absurd  or  un- 

'  Tischendorf    (1876),    p.    xlviii.  worthy  of  the  performer"  nearly 

As    I    have   already   intimated    on  two     centuries    ago     by    Thomas 

other  occasions,  it  seems  to  me  no  Woolston  in  his  Discourses  on  the 

explanation    to    call    such    stories  Miracles    of    our    Saviour,    1727- 

"oriental."      Christianity    was    an  1730.     The     words     in     quotation 

oriental    religion    to    begin    with.  marks  are  from  J.  B.  Bury's  His- 

Moreover,  as  our  whole  investiga-  tory  of  Freedom  of  Thought,  1913, 

tion  goes  to  show,  both  classical  p,  142. 
antiquity   and   the   medieval   west 


XVI  THE  CHRISTIAN  APOCRYPHA  389 

centuries.  On  the  other  hand,  I  know  of  no  reason  for 
thinking  Christians  of  the  first  century  any  less  credulous 
than  Christians  of  the  fifth  century ;  it  was  not  until  the  lat- 
ter century  that  Pope  Gelasius'  condemnation  of  apocryphal 
books  was  drawn  up,  but  apocryphal  books  had  long  been 
in  existence  before  that  time;  nor  for  thinking  the  Chris- 
tians of  the  thirteenth  century  any  more  credulous  than  those 
of  the  other  two  centuries.  It  is  only  in  our  own  age  that 
Christians  have  become  really  critical  of  such  matters. 
Moreover,  these  unacceptable  miracles,  whenever  they  were 
invented,  were  presumably  invented  by  and  accepted  by 
Christians,  who  must  bear  the  discredit  for  them.  What- 
ever the  century  was,  the  same  men  believed  in  them  who 
believed  in  the  miracles  recorded  in  the  New  Testament. 
If  the  plant  has  flowered  into  such  rank  superstition,  can  the 
original  seed  escape  responsibility?  The  Arabic  Gospel  of 
the  Infancy  is  no  doubt  an  extreme  instance  of  Christian 
credence  in  magic,  but  it  is  an  instance  that  cannot  be  over- 
looked, whatever  its  date,  place,  or  language. 

These  apocryphal  gospels  of  the  Infancy,  which  are  in  Their 
part  extant  only  in  Latin,  continued  to  be  influential  in  the  j^^fluence. 
medieval  period.  At  the  beginning  of  it  we  find  included  in 
Pope  Gelasius'  list  of  apocryphal  works,  published  at  a 
synod  at  Rome  in  494,^  besides  apocryphal  gospels  of  Mat- 
thew and  of  Thomas — which  last  we  are  told,  "the  Mani- 
cheans  use" — a  Liber  de  infantia  Salvatoris  and  a  Liber 
de  nativitate  Salvatoris  et  de  Maria  et  obstetrice.  There 
are  numerous  manuscripts  of  such  gospels  in  the  later  me- 
dieval centuries  but  it  would  not  be  safe  to  attempt  to  iden- 
tify or  classify  them  without  examining  each  in  detail.  As 
Tischendorf  said,  the  Latins  do  not  seem  to  have  long  re- 
mained content  with  mere  translations  of  the  Greek  pseudo- 
gospel  of  James  but  combined  the  stories  told  there  with 
others  from  the  Pseudo-Thomas  or  other  sources  into  new 

*Migne,  PL,  59,  i62tf.    The  list  con    (IV,    15),    and    in  _  the    thir- 

was  reproduced  with  slight  varia-  teenth     century     by     Vincent     of 

tions  by  Hugh  of  St.  Victor  in  the  Beauvais  in  the  Speculum  Natu- 

twelfth  century  in  his  Didascali-  rale  (I,  14). 


390 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Resem- 
blances to 
Apuleius 
and  Apol- 
lonius  in 
the  Arabic 
Gospel 
of  the 
Infancy. 


apocryphal  treatises.  Thus  the  extant  Latin  apocrypha  in 
no  case  reproduce  the  Gospel  of  James  accurately  but  rather 
are  imitated  after  it,  and  include  some  of  it,  omit  some  of 
it,  embellish  some  of  its  tales,  and  add  to  it.^  Male  states 
in  his  work  on  religious  art  in  France  in  the  thirteenth  cen- 
tury that  The  Gospel  of  the  Pseudo-Matthew  and  The  Gos- 
pel of  Nicodemus  or  Acts  of  Pilate  were  the  two  apocryphal 
gospels  especially  used  in  the  twelfth  and  thirteenth  cen- 
turies.^ 

That  the  fables  of  the  Arabic  Gospel  of  the  Infancy 
were  at  least  not  fresh  from  the  orient  is  indicated  by  the 
way  in  which  some  of  the  incidents  in  the  stories  of  Apuleius 
and  Apollonius  of  Tyana  are  closely  paralleled,^  In  the  par- 
lor of  a  well  furnished  house  where  lived  two  sisters  with 
their  widowed  mother  stood  a  mule  caparisoned  in  silk 
and  with  an  ebony  collar  about  his  neck,  "whom  they  kissed 
and  were  feeding."  *  He  was  their  brother,  transformed 
into  a  mule  by  the  sorcery  of  a  jealous  woman  one  night 
a  little  before  daybreak,  although  all  the  doors  of  the  house 
were  locked  at  the  time.  "And  we,"  they  tell  a  girl  who  had 
been  instantly  cured  of  leprosy  by  use  of  perfumed  water 
in  which  the  Christ  child  had  been  washed  and  who  had  then 
become  the  maid-servant  of  the  virgin  Mary,^  "have  applied 
to  all  the  wise  men,  magicians,  and  diviners  in  the  world, 
but  they  have  been  of  no  service  to  us."  ^  The  girl  recom- 
mends them  to  consult  Mary,  who  restores  their  brother 
to  human  form  by  placing  the  Christ  child  upon  his  back. 
This  romantic  episode  is  then  brought  to  a  fitting  conclusion 
by  the  marriage  of  the  brother  to  the  girl  who  had  assisted 
in  his  restoration  to  his  right  body.  As  the  demon,  who 
^Tischendorf    (1876),  pp.  xxiii-      craft    and     magic."    The    resem- 


XXIV. 

*Male    (1913),  pp.  207-8. 

'  Since  writing  this,  I  find  that 
Male  has  been  impressed  by  the 
same  resemblance.  He  writes 
(1913)7  P-  207,  "Some  chapters  in 
the  apocryphal  gospels  are  like 
the  Life  of  Apollomus  of  Tyana 
or  even  like  The  Golden  Ass,  per- 
meated with  the  belief   in  witch- 


blance  to  Apuleius  is  also  noted  in 
AN,  VIII,  353. 

*  Tischendorf ,  Evang.  Infantiae 
Arabicum,  caps.  20-21. 

"Ibid.,  cap.   17. 

*  Ibid.,  cap.  20,  "nullum  in  mun- 
do  doctum  aut  magum  aut  incan- 
tatorem  omisimus  quin  ilium 
accerseremus ;  sed  nihil  nobis 
profuit." 


XVI  THE  CHRISTIAN  APOCRYPHA  391 

in  the  form  of  an  artful  beggar  was  causing  the  plague 
at  Ephesus  and  whom  Apollonius  had  stoned  to  death, 
turned  at  the  last  moment  into  a  mad  dog,  so  Satan,  when 
forced  by  the  presence  of  the  Christ  child  to  leave  the  boy 
Judas,  ran  away  like  a  mad  dog.^  The  reviving  of  a  corpse 
by  an  Egyptian  prophet  in  the  Metamorphoses  in  order  that 
the  dead  man  may  tell  who  murdered  him  is  paralleled  in 
both  the  Arabic  Infancy  and  the  gospels  of  Thomas  and  the 
Pseudo-Matthew  by  the  conduct  of  Jesus  when  accused  of 
throwing  another  boy  down  from  a  house-top.  The  text 
reads :  "Then  the  Lord  Jesus  going  down  stood  over  the 
dead  boy  and  said  with  a  loud  voice,  'Zeno,  Zeno,  who  threw 
you  down  from  the  house-top?'  Then  the  dead  boy  an- 
swered, 'Lord,  thou  didst  not  throw  me  down,  but  so-and- 
so  did."  2 

Many  were  the  occasions  upon  which  the  Christ  child  or   Counter- 
his  mother  counteracted  the  operations  of  magic  or  relieved  ^aRicand 
persons  who  were  possessed  by  demons.    Kissing  him  cured  demons. 
a  bride  whom  sorcerers  had  made  dumb  at  her  wedding,^ 
and  a  bridegroom  who  was  kept  by  sorcery  from  enjoying 
his  wife  was  cured  of  his  impotence  by  the  mere  presence 
of  the  holy  family  who  lodged  in  his  house  for  the  night.* 
Mary's  pitying  glance  was  sufficient  to  expel  Satan  from  a 
woman  possessed   by   demons.^     Another   upright   woman 
who  was  often  vexed  by  Satan  in  the  form  of  a  serpent 
when  she  went  to  bathe  in  the  river,®  which  reminds  one 
somewhat  of  Olympias  and  Nectanebus,"^  was  permanently 
cured  by  kissing  the  Christ  child.     And  a  girl,  whose  blood 
Satan  used  to  suck,  miraculously  discomfited  him  when  he 

^Evang.    Inf.    Arab.,    cap.    35,  side,  on  which  Judas  struck  him, 

"Extemplo    exivit    ex    puero    illo  the    Jews    pierced   with    a    lance." 

satanas   fugiens  cani   rabido  simi-  ^  Ibid.,  cap.  44;  Evang.  Thomae 

lis."    The  apocryphal  gospel  adds,  Lat.,  cap.  7 ;  Ps.  Matth.,  cap.  32. 

"This  same  boy  who  struck  Jesus,"  'Evang.  Inf.  Arab.,  cap.   15. 

i..e.,   while   he   was   still  possessed  ^  Ibid.,    cap.    19,    "qui    veneficio 

by  the  demon,  "and  out  of  whom  tactus  uxore  f rui  non  poterat." 

Satan  went  in  the  form  of  a  dog,  ^  Ibid.,  cap.  14. 

was  Judas  Iscariot,  who  betrayed  "Ibid.,  cap.  16. 

Him  to  the  Jews.    And  that  same  ^  See  below,  chapter  24. 


392 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Other 
miracles 
and  magic 
by  the 
Christ 
child. 


appeared  in  the  shape  of  a  huge  dragon  by  putting  upon  her 
head  and  about  her  eyes  a  swaddHng  cloth  of  Jesus  which 
Mary  had  given  to  her.  Fire  then  went  forth  and  was  scat- 
tered upon  the  dragon's  head  and  eyes,  as  from  the  Winking 
eyes  of  the  artful  beggar  who  caused  the  plague  in  the  Life 
of  Apollonins  of  Tyana,  and  he  fled  in  a  panic.^  A  priest's 
three-year-old  son  who  was  possessed  by  a  great  multitude 
of  devils,  who  uttered  many  strange  things,  and  who  threw 
stones  at  everybody,  was  likewise  cured  by  placing  on  his 
head  one  of  Christ's  swaddling  clothes  which  Mary  had 
hung  out  to  dry.  In  this  case  the  devils  made  their  escape 
through  his  mouth  "in  the  shape  of  crows  and  serpents."  ^ 
Such  marvels  may  offend  modern  taste  but  have  their  prob- 
able prototype  in  the  miracles  wrought  by  use  of  Paul's 
handkerchief  and  underwear  in  the  New  Testament  and  il- 
lustrate, like  the  placing  of  spittle  on  the  eyes  of  the  blind 
man,  the  great  healing  virtue  then  ascribed  to  the  perspira- 
tion and  other  secretions  and  excretions  of  the  human  body. 
Sick  children  as  well  as  lepers  were  cured  by  the  water 
in  which  Jesus  had  bathed  or  by  wearing  coats  made  of 
his  swaddling  clothes,^  while  the  child  Bartholomew  was 
snatched  from  the  very  jaws  of  death  by  the  mere  smell  of 
the  Christ  child's  garments  the  moment  he  was  placed  on 
Jesus'  bed.*  On  the  road  to  Egypt  is  a  balsam  which  was 
produced  "from  the  sweat  which  ran  down  there  from  the 
Lord  Jesus."  ^  The  Christ  child  cured  snake-bite,  in  the  case 
of  his  brother  James  by  blowing  on  it,  in  the  case  of  his  play- 
fellow, Simon  the  Canaanite,  by  forcing  the  serpent  who 
had  stung  him  to  come  out  of  its  hole  and  suck  all  the  poison 
from  the  wound,  after  which  he  cursed  the  snake  "so  that 
it  immediately  burst  asunder  and  died,"  ®  When  the  boy 
Jesus  took  all  the  cloths  waiting  to  be  dyed  with  different 
colors  in  a  dyer's  shop  and  threw  them  into  the  furnace,  the 
dyer  began  to  scold  him  for  this  mischief,  but  the  cloths  all 

^  Evang.  Inf.  Arab.,  caps.  33-34.  ^  Ibid.,  cap.  24. 

^ Ibid.,  caps.  lo-ii.  ''Ibid.,  caps.  42-43;   Ps.  Matth., 

'Ibid.,  caps.  27-32.  41;  Evang.  Thorn.  Lat.,  14.    Colli" 

*  Ibid.,  cap.  30.  pare  pp.  279-80  above. 


XVI  THE  CHRISTIAN  APOCRYPHA  393 

came  out  of  the  desired  colors.^  Jesus  also  miraculously 
remedied  the  defective  carpentry  of  Joseph,  who  had  v^orked 
for  tv^o  years  on  a  throne  for  the  king  of  Jerusalem  and 
made  it  too  short.  Jesus  and  Joseph  took  hold  of  the  oppo- 
site sides  and  pulled  the  throne  out  to  the  required  dimen- 
sions.^ 

The  usual  result  of  the  Christ  child's  miracles  was  that  Sometimes 
all  the  bystanders  united  in  praising  God.  But  when  his  lit-  -^j^urious 
tie  playmates  went  home  and  told  their  parents  how  he  had  results. 
made  his  clay  animals  walk  and  his  clay  birds  fly,  eat,  and 
drink,  their  elders  said,  "Take  heed,  children,  for  the  future 
of  his  company,  for  he  is  a  sorcerer;  shun  and  avoid  him, 
and  from  henceforth  never  play  with  him,"  ^  Indeed,  if 
the  theory  of  the  fathers  is  correct  that  the  surest  hall-mark 
by  which  divine  miracles  may  be  distinguished  from  feats  of 
magic  is  that  the  former  are  never  wrought  for  any  evil 
end  while  the  latter  are,  it  must  be  admitted  that  his  con- 
temporaries were  sometimes  justified  in  suspecting  the 
Christ  child  of  resort  to  magic.  After  his  playmates  had 
been  thus  forbidden  to  associate  with  Jesus,  they  hid  from 
him  in  a  furnace,  and  some  women  at  a  house  near  by  told 
him  that  there  were  not  boys  but  kids  in  the  furnace.  Jesus 
then  actually  transformed  them  into  kids  who  came  skipping 
forth  at  his  command.^  It  is  true  that  he  soon  changed  them 
back  into  human  form,  and  that  the  women  worshiped  Christ 
and  asserted  their  conviction  that  he  was  "come  to  save  and 
not  to  destroy."  But  on  several  subsequent  occasions  Jesus 
is  represented  in  the  apocryphal  gospels  of  the  infancy  as 
causing  the  death  of  his  playmates.  When  another  boy 
broke  a  little  fish-pool  which  Jesus  had  constructed  on  the 
Sabbath  day,  he  said  to  him,  "In  like  manner  as  this  water 
has  vanished,  so  shall  thy  life  vanish,"  and  the  boy  pres- 

^  Evang.  Inf.  Arab.,  cap.  37.  Ad-Damiri,  translated  by  A.  S.  G. 

"Ibid.,    38-39;    Ps.    Matth.,    37;  Jayakar,  1906,  I,  703,  for  a  Moslem 

Evang.  Thorn.  Lot.,  11.  tale  of  Jews  who  called  Jesus  "the 

*  Evang.  Inf.  Arab.,  cap.  36;  Ps.  enchanter    the    son     of     the     en- 
Matth.,  27;  Evang.  Thorn.  Lat.,  4.  chantress,"  and  were  transformed 

*  Evang.  Inf.  Arab.,  cap.  40.   See  into  pigs. 


394 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Further 
marvels 
from  the 
Pseudo- 
Matthew. 


Learning 
of  the 
Christ 
child. 


ently  died.^  When  a  third  boy  ran  into  Jesus  and  knocked 
him  down,  he  said,  "As  thou  hast  thrown  me  down,  so  shalt 
thou  fall,  nor  ever  rise;"  and  that  instant  the  boy  fell  down 
and  died.^  When  Jesus'  teacher  started  to  whip  him,  his 
hand  withered  and  he  died.  After  which  we  are  not  sur- 
prised to  hear  Joseph  say  to  Mary,  "Henceforth  we  will 
not  allow  him  to  go  out  of  the  house;  for  everyone  who  dis- 
pleases him  is  killed."  ^ 

As  has  been  indicated  in  the  foot-notes  many  of  the 
foregoing  marvels  are  recounted  in  the  Pseudo-Matthew  and 
Latin  Gospel  of  Thomas  as  well  as  in  the  Arabic  Gospel  of 
the  Infancy.  The  Pseudo-Matthew  also  tells  how  lions 
adored  the  Christ  child  and  were  bade  by  him  to  go  in  peace.* 
And  how  he  "took  a  dead  child  by  the  ear  and  suspended 
him  from  the  earth  in  the  sight  of  all.  And  they  saw  Jesus 
speaking  with  him  like  a  father  with  his  son.  And  his  spirit 
returned  unto  him  and  he  lived  again.  And  all  marveled 
thereat."  ^  When  a  rich  man  named  Joseph  died  and  was 
lamented,  Jesus  asked  his  father  Joseph  why  he  did  not  help 
his  dead  namesake.  When  Joseph  asked  what  there  was 
that  he  could  do,  Jesus  replied,  "Take  the  handkerchief  which 
is  on  your  head  and  go  and  put  it  over  the  face  of  the  corpse 
and  say  to  him,  'May  Christ  save  you.'  "  Joseph  followed 
these  instructions  except  that  he  said,  "Salvet  te  lesus,"  in- 
stead of  "Salvet  te  Christiis,"  which  was  possibly  the  reason 
why  the  dead  man  upon  reviving  asked,  "Who  is  Jesus  ?"  ® 

While  no  very  elaborate  paraphernalia  or  ceremonial 
were  involved  in  the  miracles  ascribed  to  the  Christ  child 
in  the  Arabic  Gospel  of  the  Infancy,  it  is  perhaps  worth 
noting  that  he  was  already  possessed  of  all  learning  and  non- 
plussed his  masters,  when  they  tried  to  teach  him  the  alpha- 

^Evang.  Inf.  Arab.,  46;  Evang. 
Thorn.  Lat.,  4;  Ps.  Matth.,  26, 
where  Mary  afterwards  induces 
Jesus  to  restore  him  to  life,  and  28. 

'Evang.  Inf.  Arab.,  cap.  47; 
Evang.  fhom.  Lat.,  5 ;  Ps.  Matth., 
29. 


'Evang.    Inf.    Arab.,    cap. 

49; 

Evang.     Thorn.     Lat.,     12; 

Ps. 

Matth.,  38. 

*Ps.  Matth.,  caps.  35-36. 

^  Ibid.,  cap.  29. 

*  Ibid.,  cap.  40. 

XVI  THE  CHRISTIAN  APOCRYPHA  395 

bet,  by  asking  the  most  abstruse  questions.  And  when  he 
appeared  before  the  doctors  in  the  temple,  he  expounded  to 
them  not  only  the  books  of  the  law,^  but  natural  philosophy, 
astronomy,  physics  and  metaphysics,  physiology,  anatomy, 
and  psychology.  He  is  represented  as  telling  them  "the 
number  of  the  spheres  and  heavenly  bodies,  as  also  their 
triangular,  square,  and  sextile  aspect ;  their  progressive  and 
retrograde  motion;  their  twenty- fourths  and  sixtieths  of 
twenty-fourths"  (perhaps  corresponding  to  our  hours  and 
minutes!)  *'and  other  things  which  the  reason  of  man  had 
never  discovered."  Furthermore,  "the  powers  also  of  the 
body,  its  humors  and  their  effects;  also  the  number  of  its 
members,  and  bones,  veins,  arteries,  and  nerves;  the  several 
constitutions  of  the  body,  hot  and  dry,  cold  and  moist,  and 
the  tendencies  of  them;  how  the  soul  operates  upon  the 
body;  what  its  various  sensations  and  faculties  are;  the 
faculty  of  speaking,  anger,  desire ;  and  lastly,  the  manner  of 
the  body's  composition  and  dissolution,  and  other  things 
which  the  understanding  of  no  creature  had  ever  reached."  ^ 
It  may  be  added  that  in  the  apocryphal  epistles  supposed  to 
have  been  interchanged  between  Christ  and  Abgarus,  king 
of  Edessa,  that  monarch  writes  to  Christ,  "I  have  been  in- 
formed about  you  and  your  cures,  which  are  performed 
without  the  use  of  herbs  and  medicines."  ^ 

Jesus  is  again  accused  of  magic  in  The  Gospel  of  Nico-   Other 
demus  or  Acts  of  Pontius  Pilate,  where  the  Jews  tell  Pilate   of  magic 
that  he  is  a  conjurer.    After  Pilate  has  been  warned  by  his   of^J^f 
wife,  the  Jews  repeat,  "Did  we  not  say  unto  thee.  He  is  a   and  the 
magician?     Behold,  he  hath  caused  thy  wife  to  dream."  * 
In  the  Acts  of  Paul  and  Thecla,  to  which  Tertullian  refers 
and  which  are  now  seen  to  be  an  excerpt  from  the  apocry- 

^  Later    the    same    gospel     (cap.  Syriac    in    the    pubHc    records    of 

54)     rather    inconsistently    repre-  Edessa.     Hone   says   that  it  used 

sents    Jesus    as    engaged    in    the  to   be   a  common   practice  among 

study    of    law    until    his    thirtieth  English  people  to  have  the  epistle 

year.  ascribed    to     Christ    framed    and 

'  Evang.  Inf.  Arab.,  caps.  51-52.  place  a  picture  of  the  Saviour  be- 

'  Eusebius    states    that    he    dis-  fore  it. 
covered    these    letters    written    in  *  Gospel  of  Nicodcmiis,  I,  1-2. 


apostles. 


396 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


The  Magi 
and  the 
star. 


Alle- 
gorical 
zoologj'  of 
Barnabas. 


phal  Acts  of  Paul,  discovered  in  1899  in  a  Coptic  papyrus/ 
the  mob  similarly  cries  out  against  Paul,  "He  is  a  magi- 
cian; away  with  him."  In  the  Acts  of  Peter  and  Andrew  ^ 
they  are  both  accused  of  being  sorcerers  by  Onesiphorus, 
who  also,  however,  denies  that  Peter  can  make  a  camel  go 
through  the  eye  of  a  needle.  Nor  is  he  satisfied  when  the 
feat  is  successfully  performed  with  a  needle  and  camel  of 
Peter's  selection,  but  insists  upon  its  being  repeated  with  an 
animal  and  instrument  of  his  own  selection.  Onesiphorus 
also  has  "a  polluted  woman"  ride  upon  his  camel's  back, 
apparently  with  the  idea  that  this  will  break  the  magic  spell. 
But  Peter  sends  the  camel  through  the  eye  of  the  needle, 
"which  opened  up  like  a  gate,"  as  successfully  as  before, 
and  also  back  again  through  it  once  more  from  the  opposite 
direction. 

Some  details  are  added  by  the  apocrypha  to  the  account 
of  the  star  at  Christ's  birth.  The  Arabic  Gospel  states  that 
Zoroaster  (Zeraduscht)  had  predicted  the  coming  of  the 
Magi,  that  Mary  gave  the  Magi  one  of  Christ's  swaddling 
clothes,  that  they  were  guided  on  their  homeward  journey 
by  an  angel  in  the  form  of  the  star  which  had  led  them  to 
Bethlehem,  and  that  after  their  return  they  found  that  the 
swaddling  cloth  would  not  burn  in  fire.^  The  Epistle  of 
Ignatius  to  the  EpJiesians  states  that  this  star  shone  with  a 
brightness  far  exceeding  all  others,  filling  men  with  fear, 
and  that  with  its  coming  the  power  of  magic  was  destroyed 
and  the  new  kingdom  of  God  ushered  in."* 

In  the  apocryphal  Epistle  of  Barnabas  occurs  some  of 
that  allegorical  zoology  which  we  are  apt  to  associate  es- 
pecially with  the  Physiologus.  In  its  ninth  chapter  the  hy- 
ena and  weasel  are  adduced  as  examples  of  its  contention 
that  the  Mosaic  distinction  between  clean  and  unclean  ani- 
mals has  a  spiritual  meaning.  Thus  the  command  not  to 
eat  the  hyena  means  not  to  be  an  adulterer  or  corrupter  of 


*CE,  Apocrypha,  p.  611. 

'  Greek  text  in  Tischendorf, 
Apocalypses  Apocryph.,  pp.  161-7; 
English    translation,     The    Ante- 


Nicene  Fathers,  VIII,  526-7. 
'  Evang.  Inf.  Arab.,  7-8. 
*  Cap.  19  (AN,  I,  57). 


XVI  THE  CHRISTIAN  APOCRYPHA  397 

others,  for  the  hyena  changes  its  sex  annually.  The  weasel 
which  conceives  with  its  mouth  signifies  persons  with  un- 
clean mouths.  In  the  Acts  of  Barnabas  he  cures  the  sick 
of  Cyprus  by  laying  a  copy  of  the  Gospel  of  Matthew  upon 
their  bodies.^ 

If  we  turn  again  to  the  various  apocryphal  Acts,  where  Traces  of 
we  have  already  noted  charges  of  magic  made  against  the  j^  ^he 
apostles,  we  may  find  traces  of  gnosticism  which  have  al-   apocryphal 
ready  been  noted  by  Anz.^    In  the  Acts  of  Thomas  the  Holy 
Ghost  is  called  the  pitying  mother  of  seven  houses  whose 
rest  is  the  eighth  house  of  heaven.    In  the  Acts  of  Philip 
that  apostle  prays,  "Come  now,  Jesus,  and  give  me  the  eter- 
nal crown  of  victory  over  every  hostile  power  .  .  .  Lord 
Jesus   Christ  .  .  .  lead   me   on  .  .  .  until   I   overcome  all 
the  cosmic  powers  and  the  evil  dragon  who  opposes  us.  Now 
therefore  Lord  Jesus  Christ  make  me  to  come  to  Thee  in 
the  air."     The  Acts  of  John,  too,  speak  of  overcoming  fire 
and   darkness   and   angels   and   demons   and   archons   and 
powers  of  darkness  who  separate  man  from  God. 

We  deal  in  another  chapter  with  the  struggle  of  the  Legend 
apostles  with  Simon  Magus  as  recounted  in  the  apocryphal  °  •'°  "* 
Acts  of  Peter  and  Paul,  and  with  similar  legends  of  the  con- 
tests of  other  apostles  with  magicians.  Here,  however,  we 
may  mention  some  of  the  marvels  in  the  apocryphal  legend 
of  St.  John,  supposed  to  have  been  written  by  his  disciple 
Procharus  and  "which  deluded  the  Greek  Church  by  its  air 
of  sincerity  and  its  extreme  precision  of  detail,"  ^  although 
it  does  not  seem  to  have  reached  the  west  until  the  sixteenth 
century.  John  is  represented  as  drinking  without  injury  a 
poison  which  had  killed  two  criminals,  and  as  reviving  two 
corpses  without  going  near  them  by  directing  an  incredulous 
pagan  to  lay  his  cloak  over  them.     A  Stoic  philosopher  had 

^ Ante-Nicene     Fathers,     VIII,  'Male     (1913),    299.     For    the 

494.  text  of  this  apocryphal  work  see 

'  W.     Anz,     Zur     Frage     nach  Migne,  Dictionnaire   des  Apocry- 

deni    Ursprung    des    Gnostisisnus  phcs,    II,    759,    et    seq..    or    more 

(1897),     pp.     36-41.     Lipsius     ct  recently,     Bonnet,     Acta     aposto- 

Bonnet,    Acta    apostolorum   apoc-  lorum    apocrypha,    1898,    II,    151- 

rypha,  1891-.  216. 


398 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Legend 
of  St. 
Sousnjnos. 


persuaded  some  young  men  to  embrace  the  life  of  poverty 
by  converting  their  property  into  gems  and  then  pounding 
the  gems  to  pieces.  John  made  the  criticism  that  this  wealth 
might  have  better  been  distributed  among  the  poor,  and 
when  challenged  to  do  so  by  the  Stoic,  prayed  to  God  and 
had  the  gems  made  whole  again.  Later  when  the  young  men 
longed  for  their  departed  wealth,  he  turned  the  pebbles  on 
the  seashore  into  gold  and  precious  stones,  a  miracle  which 
is  said  to  have  persuaded  the  medieval  alchemists  that  he 
possessed  the  secret  of  the  philosopher's  stone. ^  At  any 
rate  Adam  of  St.  Victor  in  the  twelfth  century  wrote  the 
following  lines  concerning  St.  John  in  a  chant  to  be  used 
in  the  church  service : 

Cum  gemmarum  partes  fractas 

Solidasset,  has  distractas 
Tribuit  pauperibus; 

Inexhaustum  fert  thesaurum 

Qui  de  virgis  fecit  aurum, 
Gemmas  de  lapidibus.^ 

The  brief  legend  of  St.  Sousnyos,  which  Basset  has 
included  in  his  edition  of  Ethiopian  Apocrypha,^  is  all 
magic,  beginning  with  an  incantation  or  magic  prayer 
against  disease  and  demons.  There  is  also  a  Slavonic  ver- 
sion. This  Sousnyos  is  presumably  the  same  as  the  Sisin- 
nios  who  is  said  by  the  author  of  the  apocryphal  Acts  of 
Archelans,'^  forged  about  330-340  A.  D.,  to  have  abandoned 
Mani,  embraced  Christianity,  and  revealed  to  Archelaus 
secret  teachings  which  enabled  him  to  triumph  over  his  ad- 
versary. 


^Male  (1913),  300.  But  one 
would  think  that  they  must  needs 
be  Byzantine  alchemists,  if  the 
legend  did  not  reach  the  west  until 
the  sixteenth  century. 

'HL,  XV,  42. 
When   the   gems,   all   smashed   to 

pieces. 
He  had  mended,  then  their  prices 

To  the  poor  he  handed ; 
Quite  exhaustless  was  his  treasure 
Who    from    sticks    made   gold   at 


pleasure, 

Gems  from  stones  commanded. 

'  Rene  Basset,  Les  apocryphes 
£thiopiens,  Paris,  1893- 1894,  vol. 
iv. 

*See  Migne,  PG,  X  (1857),  for 
the  old  Latin  version;  the  Greek 
text  is  extant  only  in  fragments ; 
the  tradition,  going  back  to 
Jerome,  that  there  was  a  Syriac 
original  is  unfounded ;  the  work  is 
first  cited  by  Cyril. 


XVI  THE  CHRISTIAN  APOCRYPHA  399 

While  on  the  subject,  mention  may  be  made  of  two  Old  Testa- 
works  which  properly  belong  to  the  apocrypha  of  the  Old  ap^ocrypha 
Testament,  but  which  first  appear  during  the  Christian  era  of  the 
and  so  fall  within  our  period.  The  Ascension  of  Isaiah,^  of  era. 
which  the  old  Latin  version  was  printed  at  Venice  in  1 522, 
and  which  dates  back  to  the  second  century,  is  something 
like  the  Book  of  Enoch,  describing  Isaiah's  ascent  through 
the  seven  heavens  and  vision  of  the  mission  of  Christ.  In 
the  Book  of  Bctruch,  of  which  the  original  version  was  writ- 
ten in  Greek  by  a  Christian  of  the  third  or  fourth  century,^ 
the  most  interesting  episode  is  the  magic  sleep  into  which, 
like  Rip  Van  Winkle,  Abimelech  falls  during  the  destruc- 
tion of  Jerusalem  by  the  Chaldeans.  In  the  legend  of  Jere- 
miah the  prophet's  soul  is  absent  from  his  body  on  one  oc- 
casion for  three  days,  while  on  another  occasion  he  dresses 
up  a  stone  to  impersonate  himself  before  the  populace  who 
are  trying  to  stone  him  to  death,  in  order  that  he  may  gain 
time  to  make  certain  revelations  to  Abimelech  and  Baruch. 
When  he  has  had  his  say,  the  stone  asks  the  people  why  they 
persist  in  stoning  it  instead  of  Jeremiah,  against  whom  they 
then  turn  their  missiles.^ 

Such  is  no  exhaustive  listing  but  rather  a  few  examples 
of  the  encouragement  given  to  belief  in  magic  by  the  Chris- 
tian Apocrypha. 

*  The     Ethiopic    version,    made  and    Box,    Translations   of  Early 

from  the  Greek  between  the  fifth  Documents,  Series  I,  vol.  7. 

and  seventh  centuries,  is  translated  '  The  fragments  of  the  Book  of 

by    Basset    (1894),    vol.    iii ;    and  Baruch    by    Justin,    preserved    in 

was  printed  before  him  by  Dill-  the  Philosophumena   of    Hippoly- 

mann,   Asccnsio   Isaiae   aethiopice  tus,  are  from  an  entirely  different 

et    latine,    Leipzig,    1877,    and    by  Gnostic  work. 

Laurence,    Ascensio    Isaiae    vatis,  *  R.      Basset,     Les     apocryphes 

opusculum    pseudepigraphus,    Ox-  ^thiopiens,    Paris,    1893- 1894,    vol, 

ford,      1819.      See     also     R.      H.  i,     Le     Lizve    de     Baruch    et    la 

Charles,      Ascension     of     Isaiah,  legende  de  Jeremie. 
1900;  reprinted   1917  in  Oesterley 


CHAPTER  XVII 

THE  RECOGNITIONS  OF  CLEMENT  AND  SIMON  MAGUS 


The  Pseudo-Clementines — Was  Rufinus  the  sole  medieval  version? 
• — Previous  Greek  versions — Date  of  the  original  version — Internal  evi- 
dence— Resemblances  to  Apuleius  and  Philostratus — Science  and  re- 
ligion— Interest  in  natural  science — God  and  nature — Sin  and  nature — 
Attitude  to  astrology — Arguments  against  genethlialogy — The  virtuous 
Seres — Theory  of  demons — Origin  of  magic — Frequent  accusations  of 
magic — Marvels  of  magic — How  distinguish  miracle  from  magic? — 
Deceit  in  magic — Murder  of  a  boy — Magic  is  evil — Magic  is  an  art — 
Other  accounts  of  Simon  Magus :  Justin  Martyr  to  Hippolytus — Peter's 
account  in  the  Didascalia  et  Constitutiones  Apostolorum — Arnobius, 
Cyril,  and  Philastrius — Apocryphal  Acts  of  Peter  and  Paul — An  ac- 
count ascribed  to  Marcellus — Hegesippus — A  sermon  on  Simon's  fall — 
Simon  Magus  in  medieval  art. 

"The  Truth  herself  shall  receive  thee  a  wanderer  and  a 
stranger,  and  enroll  thee  a  citizen  of  her  own  city." 

— Recognitions  I,  13. 

The  The  starting-point  and  chief  source  for  this  chapter  will 

Ckmen^       be  the  writings  known  as  the  Pseudo-Clementines  and  more 
tines.  particularly  the  Latin  version  commonly  called  The  Recog- 

nitions.    We  shall  then  note  other  accounts  of  its  villain- 
hero,  Simon  Magus,  in  patristic  literature.^     The  Pseudo- 


*Text  of  The  Recognitions  \n 
Migne,  PG,  I ;  of  The  Homilies  in 
PG,  II,  or  P.  de  Lagarde,  Clem- 
entina, 1865.  E.  C.  Richardson 
had  an  edition  of  The  Recog- 
nitions in  preparation  in  1893, 
when  a  list  of  some  seventy  MSS 
communicated  by  him  was  pub- 
lished in  A.  Harnack's  Gesch.  d. 
altchr.  Lit.,  I,  229-30,  but  it  has 
not  yet  appeared.  In  quoting  The 
Recognitions  I  often  avail  myself 
of  the  language  of  the  English 
translation  in  the  Ante-Nicene 
Fathers. 


Since  A.  Hilgenf  eld.  Die  klement. 
Rekogn.  u.  Homilien,  1848,  the 
Pseudo-Clementines  have  pro- 
vided a  much  frequented  field  of 
research  and  controversy,  of 
which  the  articles  in  CE,  EB,  and 
Realencyklop'ddie  (1913),  XXIII, 
312-6,  provide  fairly  recent  sum- 
maries from  varying  ecclesiastical 
standpoints.  For  bibliography  see 
pp.  4-5  in  the  recent  monograph 
of  W.  Heintze,  Der  Klemensro- 
m,a'n  mid  seine  griechischen  Quel- 
len,  1914,  in  TU,  XL,  2.  In  the 
same    series,    TU,    XXV,    4,    H 


400 


CHAP.  XVII  l-t^£*  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS  401 

Clementines,  as  the  name  implies,  are  works  or  different 
versions  of  one  work  ascribed  to  Clement  of  Rome,  who  is 
represented  as  writing  to  James,  the  brother  of  the  Lord, 
an  account  of  events  and  discussions  in  which  he  and  the 
apostle  Peter  had  participated  not  long  after  the  crucifixion. 
This  Pseudo-Clementine  literature  has  a  double  character, 
combining  romantic  narrative  concerning  Peter,  Simon 
Magus,  and  the  family  of  Clement  with  long,  argumentative, 
didactic,  and  doctrinal  discussions  and  dialogues  in  which 
the  same  persons  participate  but  Peter  takes  the  leading  and 
most  authoritative  part.  Not  only  the  authorship,  origin, 
and  date,  but  even  the  title  or  titles  and  the  make-up  and 
arrangement  of  the  various  versions  and  their  original  are 
doubtful  or  disputed  matters.  The  versions  now  extant 
and  published  seem  by  no  means  to  have  been  the  only  ones, 
but  we  will  describe  them  first.  In  Greek  we  have  the  ver- 
sion known  as  The  Homilies  in  twenty  books,  in  which  the 
didactic  element  preponderates.  It  is  extant  in  only  two 
manuscripts  of  the  twelfth  and  fourteenth  centuries  at  Paris 
and  Rome,^  but  is  also  preserved  in  part  in  epitomes.  Dif- 
ferent from  it  is  the  Latin  version  in  which  the  narrative 
element  plays  a  greater  part. 

This  Latin  version,  now  usually  referred  to  as  The  Rec-  Was 
ognitions,  because  the  main  point  in  its  plot  is  the  successive  the  sole 

bringing  together  again  of,  and  recognition  of  one  another   medieval 
°  °  version  ? 

by,  the  members  of  a  family  long  separated,  is  the  trans- 
lation made  by  Rufinus,  who  is  last  heard  from  in  410.  It 
is  usually  divided  into  ten  books.  Numerous  manuscripts 
of  this  version  attest  its  popularity  and  influence  in  the  mid- 
dle ages,  when  we  early  find  Isidore  of   Seville  quoting 

Waitz,    Die    Pseudo-Klementinen,  origine        Pseudo-Clementinorum, 

1904-  Diss,  inaug.,  Warsaw,  1866;  G.  R. 

Concerning   Simon   Magus   may  S.    Mead    (Fellow    of    the    Theo- 

be  mentioned:     H.  Schlurick,  De  sophical    Society),   Simon  Magus, 

Simonis  Magi  fatis  Romanis;  A.  1892;  H.  Waitz,  Simon  Magus  in 

Hilgenfeld,  Der  Magier  Simon,  in  d.   altchr.   Lit.,   in    Zeitschr.   f.   d. 

Zeitschr.  f.  wiss.  Thcol.,  XII  neutest.  IViss.,  V  (1904),  121-43. 
(1869),   353  ff-;    G.   Frommberger,  '  BN,  Greek,  930;  Ottobon,  443. 

De    Sitnone    Mago,    Pars    I,    De 


402  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

Clement  several  times  as  an  authority  on  natural  science.^ 
Arevalus,  however,  thought  that  Isidore  used  some  other 
version  of  the  Pseudo-Clementines  than  that  of  Rufinus,^  and 
in  the  medieval  period  another  title  was  common,  namely, 
The  Itinerary  of  Clement,  or  The  Itinerary  of  Peter.^ 
WiUiam  of  Auvergne,  for  instance,  in  the  first  half  of  the 
thirteenth  century  cites  the  Itinerarium  dementis  or  "Book 
of  the  disputations  of  Peter  against  Simon  Magus."  *  This 
Itinerary  of  Clement  also  heads  the  list  of  works  condemned 
as  apocryphal  by  Pope  Gelasius  at  a  synod  at  Rome  in  494,^ 
a  list  reproduced  by  Vincent  of  Beauvais  in  his  Speculum 
naturale  in  the  thirteenth  century  ^  and  in  the  previous  cen- 
tury rather  more  accurately  by  Hugh  of  St.  Victor  in 
his  Didascalicon.'^  In  all  three  cases  the  full  title  is  given 
in  practically  the  same  words,  "The  Itinerary  by  the  name 
of  the  Apostle  Peter  which  is  called  Saint  Clement's,  an 
apocryphal  work  in  eight  books."  ®  Here  we  encounter  a 
difficulty,  since  as  we  have  said  The  Recognitions  are  in 
ten  books.  We  find,  however,  that  in  another  passage  ^  Vin- 
cent correctly  cites  the  ninth  book  of  The  Recognitions  as 
Clement's  ninth  book,  and  that  the  number  of  books  into 
which  The  Recognitions  is  divided  varies  in  the  manu- 
scripts, and  that  they,  too,  more  often  call  it  The  Itinerary  of 
Clement  or  even  apply  other  designations.  Rabanus  Maurus 
in  the  ninth  century  quotes  an  utterance  of  the  apostle 
Peter  from  The  History  of  Saint  Clement,  but  the  passage 
is  found  in  The  Recognitions.^^     Vincent  of  Beauvais  also 

*  Isidore,     De      natura     rerum,  *  Vincent  of  Beauvais,  5'/'ecM^Mfw 

caps,  xxxi,  xxxvi,  xxxix-xli  (PL,  naturale,  1485,  I,  14. 

83,   1003-12).  ■'PL,  176,  787-8,  Erudit.  Didasc, 

'PL,  83,  1003,  note,  "Sunt  haec  IV,  15. 

lib.   VIII   Recognitionum   sed  ap-  *  "Itinerarium       nomine       Petri 

paret  Isidoruni  alia  interpretatione  apostoli     quod     appellatur     sancti 

usum  ac  dubitare  posse  an  ea  quae  Clementis    libri    octo   apocryphum 

circumfertur  Rufini  sit."  (or,  apocryphi)." 

'See    CU,     Trinity     1041,     14th  ^Speculum     naturale,     XXXII, 

century,    fols.    7-105,    "Inc.    pro-  129,    concerning    the    morality    of 

logus    in    librum    quern    moderni  the  Seres, 

itinerarium  beati  Petri  vocant."  "  Compare    Recognitions,    I,    27 

*Valois   (1880),  p.  204.  (PG,  I,  122)  with  Rabanus,  Com- 

'PL,  59,   162,  "Notitia  librorum  ment.  in  Genesim,  I,  2   (PL,  107, 

apocryphorum   qui   non    recipiun-  450). 
tur." 


XVII       THE  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS 


403 


quotes  "the  blessed  apostle  Peter  in  a  certain  letter  attached 
to  The  Itinerary  of  Clernent."  No  letter  by  Peter  is  pre- 
faced to  the  printed  text  of  The  Recognitions,  nor  does  Ru- 
finus  mention  such  a  letter,  although  he  does  speak  in  his 
preface  of  a  letter  by  Clement  which  he  has  already  trans- 
lated elsewhere.  Prefixed  to  the  printed  Homilies,  how- 
ever, and  in  the  manuscripts  found  also  with  The  Recog- 
nitions, are  letters  of  Peter  and  Clement  respectively  to 
James.  But  the  passage  quoted  by  Vincent  does  not  occur 
in  either,  but  comes  from  the  tenth  book  of  The  Recogni- 
tions} It  would  seem,  therefore,  despite  variations  in  the 
number  of  books  and  in  the  arrangement  of  material,  that 
the  Latin  version  by  Rufinus  was  the  only  one  current  in  the 
middle  ages,  but  we  cannot  be  sure  of  this  until  all  the  ex- 
tant manuscripts  have  been  more  carefully  examined.^ 

The  version  by  Rufinus  differed  from  previous  ones  not  Previous 
only  in  being  in  Latin  but  also  in  various  omissions  which  yerTions. 
he  admits  he  made  and  perhaps  other  changes  to  suit  it  to 
his  Latin  audience.  That  there  was  already  more  than  one 
version  in  Greek  he  shows  in  his  preface  by  describing  an- 
other text  than  that  upon  which  his  translation  or  adaptation 
was  based.  Neither  of  these  two  Greek  texts  appears  to 
have  been  the  same  as  the  present  Homilies.^  Yet  The 
Homilies  were  apparently  in  existence  at  that  time,  since 
a  Syriac  manuscript  of  411  A.  D.  contains  four  books  of 
The  Homilies  and  three  of  The  Recognitions,'^  thus  in  itself 


*  Speculum  naturale,  I,  7.  Peter 
is  represented  as  saying,  "When 
anyone  has  derived  from  divine 
Scripture  a  sound  and  firm  rule  of 
truth,  it  will  not  be  absurd  if  to 
the  assertion  of  true  dogma  he 
joins  something  from  the  educa- 
tion and  liberal  studies  which  he 
may  have  pursued  from  boyhood. 
Yet  so  that  in  all  points  he  teaches 
what  is  true  and  shuns  what  is 
false  and  pretense."  This  corre- 
sponds to  the  close  of  the  42nd 
chapter  of  the  tenth  book  of  The 
Recognitions. 

'  Since  writing  this  I  learn  that 
Professor    E.    C.    Richardson   has 


examined  most  of  the  known  MSS 
of  The  Recognitions  and  has 
found  them  all  to  be  the  version 
by  Rufinus,  except  for  a  few  addi- 
tional chapters  which  someone  has 
added  in  the  French  group  of 
MSS,  —  chapters  which  Rufinus 
seems  to  have  omitted  because  they 
were  difficult  to  translate. 

^  Heintze  (1914),  23,  however, 
argues  that  the  conclusion  of  The 
Recognitions  is  dependent  upon 
The   Homilies. 

*  Professor  E.  C.  Richardson, 
after  kindly  reading  this  chapter 
in  manuscript,  writes  me  (Sept.  5, 
1921)  that  he  doubts  if  this  Syriac 


404  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

furnishing  an  illustration  of  the  ease  with  which  new  ver- 
sions might  be  compounded  from  old.  Both  The  Homilies 
and  The  Recognitions  as  they  have  reached  us  would  seem 
to  be  confusions  and  perversions  of  this  sort,  as  their  inci- 
dents are  obviously  not  arranged  in  correct  order.  For  in- 
stance, when  the  story  of  The  Recognitions  begins  Christ 
is  still  alive  and  reports  of  His  miracles  are  reaching  Rome ; 
the  same  year  Barnabas  pays  a  visit  to  Rome  and  Clement 
almost  immediately  follows  him  back  to  Syria,  making  the 
passage  from  Rome  to  Caesarea  in  fifteen  days;^  but  on 
his  arrival  there  he  meets  Peter  who  tells  him  that  "a  week 
of  years"  have  elapsed  since  the  crucifixion  and  of  other  in- 
tervening events  involving  a  considerable  lapse  of  time.  Or 
again,  in  the  third  book  of  The  Recognitions  Simon  is  said 
to  have  sunk  his  magical  paraphernalia  in  the  sea  and  gone 
to  Rome,  but  as  late  as  the  tenth  and  last  book  we  find  him 
still  in  Antioch  and  with  enough  paraphernalia  left  to  trans- 
form the  countenance  of  Faustus. 
Date  Yet  this  late  and  misarranged  version  on  which  Rufinus 

°^.^^^  ,       bases  his  text  must  have  been  already  in  existence  for  some 

original  _  -^ 

version.  time,  since  he  confesses  that  he  has  been  a  long  while  about 
his  translation.  The  virgin  Sylvia  who  "once  enjoined  it 
upon"  him  to  "render  Clement  into  our  language"  is  now 
spoken  of  as  "of  venerable  memory,"  and  it  is  to  Bishop 
Gaudentius  that  Rufinus  "after  many  delays"  in  his  old  age 
"at  length"  presents  the  work.  We  might  thus  infer  that 
the  original  and  presumably  more  self-consistent  Pseudo- 
Clementine  narrative,  which  Rufinus  evidently  does  not  use, 
must  date  back  to  a  much  earlier  period.  We  hear  from 
other  sources  of  The  Circuits  or  Periodoi  of  Peter  by  Clem- 
ent, but  this  may  have  been  the  version  translated  by  Ru- 

MS  is  correctly  described  as  three  forms  in  Greek,  and  there  are  cer- 

books    of    The    Recognitions    and  tainly   other   oriental   compilations 

four  books  of  The  Homilies,  and  not   yet   brought   into   comparison 

that  he  thinks  it  may  represent  an  with  the  Greek,  Latin,  and  Syriac 

earlier  form  in  the  evolution  than  forms." 

either  of  them.    He  writes  further,  ^  In    The   Homilies   it   is   a  trip 

"I    have    a    strong    notion    that    a  only  from  Alexandria  to  Caesarea 

study  of  Greek  MSS  of  the  Epi-  that    consumes    this    number    of 

tomes  will  reveal  still  more  variant  days. 


evidence. 


XVII       THE  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS       405 

finus.^  Conservative  Christian  scholars  regard  as  the  old- 
est unmistakable  allusion  to  the  Pseudo-Clementines  that  by 
Eusebius  early  in  the  fourth  century,  who,  without  giving 
any  specific  titles,  speaks  of  certain  "verbose  and  lengthy 
writings,  containing  dialogues  of  Peter  forsooth  and  Apion," 
which  are  ascribed  to  Clement  but  are  really  of  recent  origin. 
As  for  the  date  of  the  original  work  from  which  Homilies 
and  Recognitions  are  derived,^  from  200  to  280  A.  D.  is  sug- 
gested by  Harnack  and  his  school,  who  take  middle  ground 
between  the  extreme  contentions  of  Hilgenfeld  and  Chap- 
man. But  the  original  Pseudo-Clement  is  supposed  to  have 
utilized  The  Teachings  of  Peter  and  The  Acts  of  Peter, 
which  Waitz  would  date  between  135  and  210  A.  D.^ 

The  work  itself,  even  in  the  perverted  form  preserved  Internal 
by  Rufinus,  makes  pretensions  to  the  highest  Christian  an- 
tiquity. Not  only  is  it  addressed  to  James  and  put  into 
the  mouth  of  Clement,  but  Paul  is  never  mentioned,  and  no 
book  of  the  New  Testament  is  cited  by  name,  while  sayings 
of  Jesus  are  cited  which  are  not  found  in  the  Bible.  Christ 
is  often  alluded  to  in  a  veiled  and  mystic  fashion  as  "the 
true  prophet,"  who  had  appeared  aforetime  to  Abraham  and 
Moses,  and  interesting  and  vivid  incidental  glimpses  are 
given  of  what  purports  to  be  the  life  of  an  early  Christian 
community  and  perhaps  is  that  of  the  Ebionites,  Essenes,  or 
some  Gnostic  sect.  Emphasis  is  laid  upon  the  purifying 
power  of  baptism,  upon  Peter's  practice  of  bathing  early 
every  morning,  preferably  in  the  sea  or  running  water,  upon 
secret  prayers  and  meetings,  a  separate  table  for  the  initi- 
ated, esoteric  discussions  of  religion  at  cock-crow  and  in 
the  night,  and  upon  power  over  demons.  All  this  may  be 
mere  clever  invention,  but  there  certainly  is  an  atmosphere 
of  verisimilitude  about  it;  and  it  is  rather  odd  that  a  later 

^  About     375     A.D.     Epiphanius  Gregory,   cites    a    passage    on    as- 

(Dindorf,  II,  107-9)  describes  The  trology  from  the  fourteenth  book 

Circuits   in    such    a    way    that    he  of    The   Circuits  which   is   in  the 

might  have  either  The  Homilies  or  tenth    book    of    The   Recognitions 

The  Recognitions  in  mind.    On  the  and  not  in  The  Homilies  at  all, 

other  hand,   the  Philocalia,   com-  ^  Heintze  (1914),  p.  113. 

posed    about    358    by    BasU    ^nd  'Waitz  (1904),  pp.  151  and  243. 


4o6 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Resem- 
blances to 
Apuleius 
and  Phi- 
lostratus. 


writer  should  be  "very  careful  to  avoid  anachronisms,"  in 
whose  account  as  it  now  stands  are  such  glaring  chronologi- 
cal confusions  as  those  already  noted  concerning  Clement's 
voyage  to  Caesarea  and  Simon's  departure  for  Rome.  But, 
as  in  the  case  of  the  New  Testament  Apocrypha,  the  exact 
date  of  composition  makes  little  difference  for  our  purpose, 
for  which  it  is  enough  that  the  Pseudo-Clementines  played 
an  important  part  in  the  first  thirteen  centuries  of  Christian 
thought  viewed  as  a  whole.  Eusebius  and  Epiphanius  may 
find  them  unpalatable  in  certain  respects  and  reject  them  as 
heretical,  but  Basil  and  Gregory  utilize  their  arguments 
against  astrology.  Gelasius  may  classify  them  as  apocry- 
phal, but  Vincent  of  Beauvais  justifies  a  discriminating  use 
of  the  apocryphal  books  in  general  and  cites  this  one  in 
particular  more  than  once  as  an  authority,  and  the  incidents 
of  its  story  were  embodied,  as  we  shall  see,  in  medieval  art. 
The  same  resemblance  to  the  works  of  Apuleius  and 
Philostratus  that  we  noted  in  the  case  of  an  apocryphal  gos- 
pel is  observable  in  the  Pseudo-Clementines.  We  see  in  The 
Recognitions  the  same  mixed  interest  in  natural  science  and 
in  magic  combined  with  religion  and  romantic  incident  that 
characterized  the  variegated  and  motley  page  of  the  author 
of  the  Metamorphoses  and  the  biographer  of  Apollonius  of 
Tyana.  It  is  probably  only  a  coincidence  that  two  of  the 
works  of  Apuleius  are  dedicated  to  a  Faustinus  whom  he 
calls  "my  son,"  while  Clement's  father  is  named  Faustus  or 
Faustinianus,  and  the  legend  of  Faust  is  believed  to  orig- 
inate with  him  and  the  episodes  in  which  he  is  concerned.-^ 
Less  accidental  may  be  the  connection  between  Peter's  re- 
ligious sea-bathing  and  that  purification  in  the  sea  by  which 
the  hero  of  the  Metamorphoses  began  the  process  by  which 
he  succeeded  in  regaining  his  lost  human  form.  More  con- 
siderable are  the  detailed  parallels  to  the  work  of  Philps- 
tratus.^    Peter  corresponds  roughly  to  Apollonius  and  Clem- 


*  See  E.  C.  Richardson  in 
Papers  of  the  American  Society 
of  Church  History,  VI  (1894). 


'  Neither  Philostratus  nor  Apol- 
lonius of  Tyana  is  mentioned, 
however,    in    the    index    of    W, 


XVII       THE  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS       4^7 

ent  to  Damis,  while  the  wizards  and  magi  are  ably  personi- 
fied by  the  famous  Simon  Magus.  If  Apollonius  abstained 
from  all  meat  and  wine  and  wore  linen  garments,  Peter  lives 
upon  "bread  alone,  with  olives,  and  seldom  even  with  pot- 
herbs; and  my  dress,"  he  says,  "is  what  you  see,  a  tunic 
with  a  pallium  :  and  having  these,  I  require  nothing  more."  ^ 
Like  Philostratus  the  Pseudo-Clement  speaks  of  bones  of 
enormous  size  which  are  still  to  be  seen  as  proof  of  the  ex- 
istence of  giants  in  former  ages;  ^  and  the  accounts  of  the 
Brahmans  and  allusions  to  the  Scythians  in  the  Life  of 
Apollonius  of  Tyana  are  paralleled  in  The  Recognitions  by 
a  series  of  brief  chapters  on  these  and  other  strange  races.' 
Peter  is,  of  course,  a  Jew,  not  a  Hellene  like  Apollonius,  but 
in  his  train  are  men  who  are  thoroughly  trained  in  Greek 
philosophy  and  capable  of  discussing  its  problems  at  length. 
They  also  are  not  without  appreciation  of  pagan  art  and 
turn  aside,  with  Peter's  consent,  to  visit  a  temple  upon  an 
island  and  "to  gaze  earnestly"  upon  "the  wonderful  col- 
umns" and  "very  magnificent  works  of  Phidias."  ^  Just  as 
Apollonius  knew  all  languages  without  having  ever  studied 
them,  so  Peter  is  so  filled  with  the  Spirit  of  God  that  he  is 
"full  of  all  knowledge"  and  "not  ignorant  even  of  Greek 
learning" ;  but  to  descend  from  his  usual  divine  themes  to 
discuss  it  is  considered  to  be  rather  beneath  him.  Clement, 
however,  felt  the  need  of  coaching  Peter  up  a  little  in  Greek 
mythology.^  This  mingled  attitude  of  contempt  for  "the 
babblings  of  the  Greeks"  when  compared  to  divine  revela- 
tion, and  of  respect  for  Greek  philosophy  when  compared 
with  anything  else  is,  it  is  hardly  necessary  to  say,  a  very- 
common  one  with  Christian  writers  throughout  the  Rom^an 
Empire. 

The  same  attitude  prevails  toward  natural  science.     At    Science 
the  very  beginning  of  the  Clementines  the  curiosity  of  the   religion. 

Heintze's  Dcr  Klemensroman  und  in    the    corresponding   chapter    of 

seine  griechischen  Quellen  (1914),  The  Homilies.  VIII,  15. 

144  pp.  ^  Recogs.,  IX,  19-29. 

^Recogs.,Vll,6.  *  Recogs.,  Yll,  12. 

^  Recogs.,  I,  29;  not  mentioned  *  Recogs.,  X,  15,  et  seq. 


4o8 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


fnterest 

in  natural 
science. 


ancient  world  in  regard  to  things  of  nature  is  shown  by  the 
question  which  someone  propounded  to  Barnabas  when  he 
began  to  preach,  at  Rome  according  to  The  Recognitions,  at 
Alexandria  according  to  The  Homilies,  of  the  Son  of  God. 
The  heckler  wanted  to  know  why  so  small  a  creature  as  a 
fly  has  not  only  six  feet  but  wings  in  addition,  while  the 
elephant,  despite  its  enormous  bulk,  has  only  four  feet  and 
no  wings  at  all.  Barnabas  did  not  answer  the  question,  al- 
though he  asserted  that  he  could  if  he  wished  to,  making  the 
excuse  that  it  was  not  fitting  to  speak  of  mere  creatures  to 
those  who  were  still  ignorant  of  their  Creator.^ 

This  unwillingness  to  discuss  natural  questions  by  no 
means  continues  characteristic  of  the  Clementines,  however. 
Not  only  does  Peter  explain  to  Clement  the  creation  of  the 
world  and  propound  the  extraordinary  ^  doctrine  that  after 
completing  the  process  of  creation  God  "set  an  angel  as 
chief  over  the  angels,  a  spirit  over  the  spirits,  a  star  over 
the  stars,  a  demon  over  the  demons,  a  bird  over  the  birds, 
a  beast  over  the  beasts,  a  serpent  over  the  serpents,  a  fish 
over  the  fishes,"  and  "over  men  a  man  who  is  Christ  Jesus. ^ 
Not  only  does  he  later  in  public  defend  baptism  with  water 
on  the  ground  that  "all  things  are  produced  from  waters" 
and  that  waters  were  first  created.*  We  also  find  Niceta 
accepting  the  Greek  hypothesis  of  four  elements,  of  the 
sphericity  of  the  universe,  and  of  the  motions  of  the  heav- 
enly bodies  "assigned  to  them  by  fixed  laws  and  periods,"  cit- 
ing Plato's  Timaeus,  mentioning  Aristotle's  introduction  of 
a  fifth  element,^  disputing  the  atomic  theory  of  Epicurus,^ 
and  alluding  to  "mechanical  science."  "^  He  further  dis- 
cusses the  generation  of  plants,  animals,  and  human  beings 
as  evidences  of  divine  design  and  providence,^  in  which  con- 
nection he  collects  a  number  of  examples  of  marvelous  gen- 


*  Recogs.,  I,  8;  Homilies,  I,  lo. 

'  Extraordinary,  of  course,  only 
in  that  single  animals  instead  of 
angels,  as  in  the  Enoch  literature, 
are  set  over  birds,  beasts,  serpents, 
etc. 


'  Recogs.,  I,  27  and  45. 
*  Recogs.,  VI,  8. 
'Recogs.,  VIII,  9,  20-22. 
^Recogs.,  VIII,  15-17. 
"Recogs.,  VIII,  21. 
"Recogs.,  VIII,  25-32. 


XVII       THE  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS        409 

eration  of  animals  such  as  moles  from  earth  and  vipers  from 
ashes,  and  affirms  that  "the  crow  conceives  through  the 
mouth  and  the  weasel  generates  through  the  ear."  ^  Simon 
Magus  declared  himself  immortal  on  the  theory,  which  we 
shall  find  cropping  out  again  in  the  thirteenth  century  in 
Roger  Bacon  and  Peter  of  Abano,  that  his  flesh  was  "so 
compacted  by  the  power  of  his  divinity  that  it  can  endure 
to  eternity."  ^  On  the  other  hand,  Niceta  describes  the  ac- 
tion of  the  intestines  in  a  fairly  intelligent  manner,^  and  tells 
how  the  blood  flows  like  water  from  a  fountain,  "and  first 
borne  along  in  one  channel,  and  then  spreading  through  in- 
numerable veins  as  through  canals,  irrigates  the  entire  ter- 
ritory of  the  human  body  with  vital  streams."  ■*  A  little 
later  on  Aquila  gives  a  natural  explanation  of  rainbows.^ 

There  is  noticeable,  it  is  true,  a  tendency,  common  in  God  and 
patristic  literature  and  found  even  among  those  fathers  who  "^^"'^^• 
hold  the  dualism  of  the  Manichees  in  the  deepest  detesta- 
tion, to  make  a  distinction  between  God  and  nature  and  to 
attribute  any  flaws  in  the  universe  to  the  latter.®  Niceta 
cannot  agree  with  "those  who  speak  of  nature  instead  of 
God  and  declare  that  all  things  were  made  by  nature" ;  he 
holds  that  God  created  the  universe.  But  Aquila,  who  sup- 
ports his  brother  in  the  discussion,  seems  to  think  that  God's 
responsibility  for  the  universe  ceased,  at  least  in  part,  after 
it  was  once  created.  At  any  rate  he  admits  that  "in  this 
world  some  things  are  done  in  an  orderly  and  some  in  a  dis- 
orderly fashion.  Those  things  therefore,"  he  continues, 
"that  are  done  rationally,  believe  that  they  are  done  by  Prov- 
idence ;  but  those  that  are  done  irrationally  and  inordinately, 
believe  that  they  befall  naturally  and  happen  accidentally."  ''' 

But  even  nature  sometimes  rises  up  against  the  sins  of   Sin  and 
mankind  according  to  Peter  and  his  associates,    Aquila  be- 

^On    the    other    hand,    in    the  *  Recogs.,ll,  y. 

apocryphal    Epistle    of    Barnabas,  '  Recogs.,  VIII,  31. 

IX,  9,  it  is  stated  that  the  weasel  *  Recogs.,  VIII,  30. 

conceives     with     its     mouth     and  '^  Recogs.,  VIII,  42. 

hence    typifies    persons    with    un-  '  Recogs.,  VIII,  34, 

clean  mouths.  '  Recogs.,  VIII,  44. 


4IO  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

lieves  that  the  sins  of  men  are  the  cause  of  pestilences;^ 
that  "when  chastisement  is  inflicted  upon  men  according  to 
the  will  of  God,  he"  (i.  e.  the  Sun,  already  called  "that  good 
servant"  and  whom  the  early  Christians  found  it  difficult  to 
cease  to  personify)  "glows  more  fiercely  and  burns  up  the 
world  with  more  vehement  fires" ;  ^  and  that  "those  who 
have  become  acquainted  with  prophetic  discourse  know  when 
and  for  what  reason  blight,  hail,  pestilence,  and  such  like 
have  occurred  in  every  generation,  and  for  what  sins  these 
have  been  sent  as  a  punishment."  ^  Peter  gives  the  impres- 
sion that  nature  sometimes  acts  rather  independently  of  God 
in  thus  punishing  the  wicked.  He  says :  "But  this  also  I 
would  have  you  know,  that  upon  such  souls  God  does  not 
take  vengeance  directly,  but  His  whole  creation  rises  up  and 
inflicts  punishments  upon  the  impious.  And  although  in  the 
present  world  the  goodness  of  God  bestows  the  light  of  the 
world  and  the  services  of  the  earth  alike  upon  the  pious  and 
the  impious,  yet  not  without  grief  does  the  Sun  afford  his 
light  and  the  other  elements  perform  their  services  to  the 
impious.  And,  in  short,  sometimes  even  in  opposition  to 
the  goodness  of  the  Creator,  the  elements  are  worn  out  by 
the  crimes  of  the  wicked ;  and  hence  it  is  that  either  the  fruit 
of  the  earth  is  blighted,  or  the  composition  of  the  air  is 
vitiated,  or  the  heat  of  the  sun  is  increased  beyond  measure, 
or  there  is  an  excess  of  rain  or  cold."  *  This  is  a  close 
approach  to  the  notion  of  The  Book  of  Enoch  that  human 
sin  upsets  the  world  of  nature,  and  an  even  closer  approach 
to  the  theory  of  the  Brahmans  in  The  Life  of  Apollonius  of 
Tyana  that  prolonged  drought  is  a  punishment  visited  by  the 
world-soul  upon  human  sinfulness. 
Attitude  Such  vestiges  of  the  world-soul  doctrine,  such  a  tend- 

trology.  ^^^y  ^^  ascribe  emotion  and  will  to  the  elements  and  planets, 
to  personify  them,  and  to  think  of  God  as  ruling  the  world 
indirectly  through  them,  prepare  us  to  find  an  attitude  rather 
favorable  to  astrological  theory.     Indeed,  in  the  first  book 

^Recogs.,  VIII,  45.  *  Recogs.,  VIII,  47. 

'Recogs..  VIII,  46.  *  Recogs.,  V,  27, 


XVII       THE  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS        4" 

of  The  Recognitions  ^  we  are  told  in  so  many  words  that 
the  Creator  adorned  the  visible  heaven  with  stars,  sun,  and 
moon  in  order  that  "they  might  be  for  an  indication  of 
things  past,  present,  and  future,"  and  that  these  celestial 
signs,  while  seen  by  all,  are  "understood  only  by  the  learned 
and  intelligent."  Astrology  is  respectfully  described  as 
"the  science  of  mathesis,"  ^  and,  as  was  common  in  the 
Roman  Empire,  astrologers  are  called  mathematici.^  A  de- 
fender even  of  the  most  extreme  pretensions  of  the  art  is 
not  abused  as  a  charlatan  but  is  courteously  greeted  as  "so 
learned  a  man,"  *  and  all  admire  his  eloquence,  grave  man- 
ners, and  calm  speech,  and  accord  him  a  respectful  hearing.^ 
Astrology,  far  from  being  regarded  as  necessarily  contrary 
to  religion,  is  thought  to  furnish  arguments  for  the  exist- 
ence of  God,  and  it  is  said  that  Abraham,  "being  an  astrolo- 
ger, was  able  from  the  rational  system  of  the  stars  to  recog- 
nize the  Creator,  while  all  other  men  were  in  error,  and 
understood  that  all  things  are  regulated  by  His  Provi- 
dence."'® The  number  seven  is  somewhat  emphasized  '^  and 
the  twelve  apostles  are  called  the  twelve  months  of  Christ 
who  is  the  acceptable  year  of  the  Lord.^  Somewhat  simi- 
larly the  Gnostic  followers  of  the  heretic  Valentinus  made 
much  of  the  Duodecad,  a  group  of  twelve  aeons,  and  be- 
lieved, according  to  Irenaeus,  "that  Christ  suffered  in  the 
twelfth  month.  For  their  opinion  is  that  He  continued  to 
preach  for  one  year  only  after  His  baptism."  ^  Peter,  too, 
has  a  group  of  twelve  disciples. ^*^  Niceta  speaks  of  "man 
who  is  a  microcosm  in  the  great  world."  ^^  It  is  admitted 
that  the  stars  exert  evil  as  well  as  good  influence,^ ^  and  that 
the  astrologer  "can  indicate  the  evil  desire  which  malign 

^  Recogs.,  I,  28.  '  Recogs.,  I,  32. 

' Recogs.,  VIII,  57,  "f rater  meus  ^Recogs.,  I,  21,  43,  72. 

Clemens  tibi  diligentius  responde-  'Recogs.,  IV,  35. 

bit  qui  plenius  scientiam  mathesis  "  Irenaeus,  I,  3. 

attigit;   IX,   18,  "quoniam  quidem  ^'' Recogs.,  Ill,  68. 

scientia  mihi  mathesis  nota  est."  ^Recogs.,    VIII,    28,    "qui    eat 

'Recogs.,  X,  11-12.  parvus  in  aHo  mundus." 

-Recogs.,  IX,  18.  "Recogs.,  VIII,  45. 

'Recogs.,  VIII,  2. 


412  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

virtue  produces."  -^     But  it  is  contended  that,  "possessing 
freedom  of  the  will,  we  sometimes  resist  our  desires  and 
sometimes  yield  to  them,"  and  that  no  astrologer  can  pre- 
dict beforehand  which  course  we  will  take. 
Argu-  In  fine,  astrology  is  criticized  adversely  only  when  it 

against  &o^s  to  the  length  of  contending  that  "there  is  neither  any 
genethli-  God,  nor  any  worship,  neither  is  there  any  Providence  in  the 
world,  but  all  things  are  done  by  fortuitous  chance  and 
genesis";  that  "whatever  your  genesis  contains,  that  shall 
befall  you"  ;  ^  and  that  the  constellations  force  men  to  commit 
murder,  adultery,  and  other  crimes.^  On  this  point  Niceta 
and  Aquila,  and  finally  Clement  himself,  have  long  discus- 
sions with  an  aged  adept  in  genethlialogy  which  fill  a  large 
portion  of  the  last  three  books  of  The  Recognitions,  and 
include  a  dozen  chapters  which  are  little  more  than  an  ex- 
tract from  The  Laws  of  Countries  of  Bardesanes.  Divine 
Providence  and  human  free  will  are  defended,  and 
genethlialogy  is  represented  as  an  error  which  has  received 
confirmation  through  the  operations  of  demons.^  It  is 
asserted  that  men  can  be  kept  from  committing  crimes  by 
fear  of  punishment  and  by  law,  even  if  they  are  naturally 
so  inclined,  and  races  like  the  Seres  (Chinese)  and 
Brahmans  are  adduced  as  examples  of  entire  races  of  men 
who  never  commit  the  crimes  into  which  men  are  supposed 
to  be  forced  by  the  constellations.  The  argument  is  also 
advanced,  "Since  God  is  righteous  and  since  He  Himself 
made  human  nature,  how  could  it  be  that  He  should  place 
genesis  in  opposition  to  us,  which  should  compel  us  to  sin, 
and  then  that  He  should  punish  us  when  we  do  sin  ?"  ^  It  is 
further  charged  that  the  constellations  are  so  complicated, 

^  Recogs.,   X,    12.     In   Homilies,  Homilies,  however,   Peter   argues 

XIV,  5,  the  existence  of  astrologi-  that,     even     if     Genesis    prevails, 

cal     medicine     is     implied     wlien  which  he  does  not  admit,  still  he 

Peter  promises  to  cure  by  prayer  can    "worship    Him    who    is    also 

to  God  any  bodily  ill,  even  "if  it  is  Lord  of   the   stars,"  and  that  the 

utterly  incurable  and  entirely  be-  doctrine    of    genesis    is    far   more 

yond    the    range    of    the    medical  destructive     to     polytheism     and 

profession — a  case,  indeed,  which  pagan  worship, 

not  even  the  astrologers  profess  to  "  Recogs.,  IX,  16-17. 

cure."  *  Recogs.,  IX,  6  and  12. 

'Recogs.,     VIII,     2.       In     The  "  Recogs.,  IX,  30. 


XVII       THE  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS       413 

that  for  any  given  moment  one  astrologer  may  infer  a  favor- 
able and  another  a  disastrous  influence/  and  that  most  suc- 
cessful explanations  of  the  effects  of  the  stars  are  made 
after  the  event,  like  dreams  of  which  men  can  make  nothing 
at  the  time,  but  "when  any  event  occurs,  then  they  adapt 
what  they  saw  in  the  dream  to  what  has  occurred."  ^  Finally 
the  aged  defender  of  genesis,  who  believed  that  his  own 
fate  and  that  of  his  wife  had  been  accurately  prescribed 
by  their  horoscopes,  turns  out  to  be  Faustinianus  (called 
Faustus  in  The  Homilies) ,  the  long-lost  father  of  Clement, 
Niceta,  and  Aquila;  is  also  restored  to  his  wife;  and  learns 
that  his  previous  interpretation  of  events  from  the  stars  was 
quite  erroneous.^ 

The  ideal  picture  of  the  Seres  or  Chinese,  "who  dwell  The 
at  the  beginning  of  the  world,"  which  The  Recognitions  Seres, 
apparently  borrows  from  Bardesanes,  is  perhaps  worth  re- 
peating here  as  an  odd  admission  that  a  non-Christian  peo- 
ple can  attain  a  state  of  moral  perfection  and  sinlessness, 
as  well  as  an  interesting  bit  of  ancient  ethnology.  "In  all 
that  country  which  is  very  large  there  is  neither  temple  nor 
image  nor  harlot  nor  adulteress,  nor  is  any  thief  brought  to 
trial.  But  neither  is  any  man  ever  slain  there.  .  .  .  For 
this  reason  they  are  not  chastened  with  those  plagues  of 
which  we  have  spoken;  they  live  to  extreme  old  age,  and 
die  without  sickness."  ^  Perhaps  these  virtuous  Seres  are 
the  blameless  Hyperboreans  in  another  guise. 

Demons  and  angels  abound  in  The  Recognitions.  One  Theory  of 
may  be  rebuked  and  scourged  at  night  by  an  angel  of  God.^ 
Peter  says  that  every  nation  has  an  angel,  since  God  has 
divided  the  earth  into  seventy-two  sections  and  appointed 
an  angel  as  governor  and  prince  of  each.^  Once,  before  be- 
ginning to  preach,  Peter  expelled  demons  from  a  number  of 
persons  in  the  audience.'''  In  another  passage  is  described 
the  cure  of  a  girl  of  twenty-seven  who  for  twenty  years 

^  Recogs.,  X,  11.  '  Recogs.,  X,  66. 

'Recogs.,  X,  12.  '  Recogs.,  II,  42. 

'  Recogs.j  IX,  32-7.  ^  Recogs.,  IV,  7. 

*Recogs.,  IX,  19,  and  VIII,  48. 


414  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

had  been  vexed  by  an  unclean  spirit  and  had  been  shut  up 
in  a  closet  in  chains  because  of  her  violence  and  superhuman 
strength.  The  mere  presence  of  Peter  put  this  demon  to 
rout  and  the  chains  fell  off  the  girl  of  their  own  accord.^ 
Besides  these  personal  encounters  with  demons,  the  theory 
of  demoniacal  possession  is  discussed  more  than  once,  and 
anything  of  which  the  author  does  not  approve,  such  as  the 
art  of  horoscopes,  heathen  oracles,  the  excesses  of  pagan 
rites  and  festivals,  and  the  animal  gods  of  the  Egyptians, 
is  attributed  to  the  influence  of  demons.^  One  becomes  sus- 
ceptible to  demoniacal  possession  who  eats  meat  sacrificed 
to  idols  or  who  merely  eats  and  drinks  immoderately.^ 
Demons  are  apt  to  get  into  the  very  bowels  of  those  who 
frequent  drunken  banquets.^  Incontinence,  too,  is  accom- 
panied by  demons  whose  "noxious  breath"  produces  *'an 
intemperate  and  vicious  progeny.  ,  .  .  And  therefore  par- 
ents are  responsible  for  their  children's  defects  of  this  sort, 
because  they  have  not  observed  the  law  of  intercourse."  '^ 
As  much  care  should  be  taken  in  human  generation  as  in  the 
sowing  of  crops.  But  while  demons  abound,  God  has  given 
every  Christian  power  over  them,  since  they  may  be  driven 
out  by  uttering  "the  threefold  name  of  blessedness."  ^  More- 
over, "what  is  spoken  by  the  true  God,  whether  by  prophets 
or  varied  visions,  is  always  true;  but  what  is  foretold  by 
demons  is  not  always  true."  "^ 
Origin  of  With  demons  is  associated  the  origin  of  the  magic  art. 

"Certain  angels  ..  .  .  taught  men  that  demons  could  be  made 
to  obey  man  by  certain  arts,  that  is,  by  magical  invoca- 
tions." ^  The  first  magicians  were  Ham  and  his  son  Mes- 
raim,  from  whom  the  Egyptians,  Babylonians,  and  Assyrians 
are  descended,  and  who  tried  to  draw  sparks  from  the  stars  ® 
but  set  himself  on  fire  "and  was  consumed  by  the  demon 

*  Recogs.,  IX,  38.  '  Recogs.,  IV,  21. 
*Recogs.,  IX,  6  and  12;  IV,  21;  "Recogs..  IV,  26. 

V,  20  and  31.  '          "Reminding    one    of    Benjamin 

'Recogs.,  II,  71;  IV,  16.  Franklin's     more     successful     at- 

*  Recogs.,  IV,  30.  tempt  to  "snatch  the  thunderbolt 
'^Recogs.,  IX,  9.  from  heaven." 

*  Recogs.,  IV,  32-33. 


I  nagic. 


XVII       THE  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS        415 

whom  he  had  accosted  with  too  great  importunity."  ^  But 
on  this  account  he  was  called  Zoroaster  or  "living  star" 
after  his  death.  Moreover,  the  magic  art  did  not  perish 
but  was  transmitted  to  Nimrod  "as  by  a  flash."  ^  With  this 
may  be  compared  the  slightly  different  account  of  the  origin 
of  magic  given  by  Epiphanius  in  the  Panarion,  written  about 
374-375  A.  D.  Magic  is  older  than  heresy  and  was  already 
in  existence  before  the  time  of  Ham  or  Mesraim  in  the 
antediluvian  days  of  Jared,  when  it  coexisted  with  "phar- 
macy," a  term  here  used  to  cover  sorcery  and  poisoning-, 
licentiousness,  adultery,  and  injustice.  After  the  flood 
Epiphanius  mentions  Nimrod  (NejSpcbS)  as  the  first  tyrant 
and  the  inventor  of  the  evil  disciplines  of  astrology  and 
magic.  He  states  that  the  Greeks  incorrectly  confuse  him 
with  Zoroaster  whom  they  regard  as  the  founder  of  magic 
and  astrology.  According  to  Epiphanius,  "pharmacy"  and 
magic  passed  from  Egypt  to  Greece  in  the  time  of  Cecrops.^ 

In  The  Recognitions  everyone.  Christian,  heretic,  pagan.  Frequent 
and  philosopher,  condemns  or  professes  to  condemn  magic,  accusa- 
and  reference  is  made  to  the  laws  of  the  Roman  emperors  magic, 
against  it.*  But  Christians,  pagans,  and  heretics,  while 
claiming  divine  power  and  protection  for  themselves,  freely 
accuse  one  another  of  the  practice  of  magic.  An  unnamed 
person,  by  whom  Paul  is  perhaps  meant,  stirs  up  the  people 
of  Jerusalem  to  persecute  the  apostolic  community  there  as 
"most  miserable  men,  who  are  deceived  by  Simon,  a 
magician."  ^  The  guards  at  the  sepulcher,  unable  to  pre- 
vent the  resurrection,  said  that  Jesus  was  a  magician,  a 
charge  which  is  repeated  by  one  of  the  scribes  and  by  Simon 
Magus.  Simon  also  calls  Peter  a  magician  on  more  than 
one  occasion.®  Peter,  of  course,  makes  similar  charges 
against  Simon;  he  had  been  especially  sent  by  James  to 
Caesarea  in  order  to  refute  this  magician  who  was  giving 
himself  out  to  be  the  Stans  or  Christ.'^     The  gods  of  Greek 


^Recogs.,  IV,  2y,  and  I,  30. 
*Recogs.,  IV,  29. 
•Dindorf,  I,  282,  286-7. 
*Recogs.,  X.  55;  III,  64. 


'  Rccogs.,  I,  70. 

'Recogs.,  I,  42  and  58;  III,  12, 
47,  and  73 ;  X,  54. 
'  Recogs.,  I,  72. 


4i6  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

mythology,  too,  are  accused  of  having  resorted  to  magic 
transformations  and  sorcery,^  Philosophy,  however,  es- 
capes the  accusation  of  magic  in  The  Recognitions,^  and  it 
was  a  philosopher  who  deterred  Clement,  before  the  latter 
liad  become  a  Christian,  from  his  plan  of  investigating  the 
problem  of  the  immortality  of  the  soul  by  hiring  an  Egyp- 
tian magician  to  evoke  a  soul  from  the  infernal  regions  by 
the  art  of  necromancy.^  The  philosopher  condemned  such 
an  attempt  as  unlawful,  impious,  and  "hateful  to  the 
Divinity."  * 
Marvels  But  while  magic  is  condemned,  its  great  powers  are  ad- 

of  magic,  mitted.  Simon  Magus  makes  great  boasts  of  the  marvels 
which  he  can  perform.  These  include  becoming  invisible, 
boring  through  rocks  and  mountains  as  if  they  were  clay, 
passing  through  fire  without  being  burned,  flying  through 
the  air,  loosing  bonds  and  barriers,  transformation  into  ani- 
mal shapes,  animation  of  statues,  production  of  new  plants 
or  trees  in  a  moment,  and  growing  beards  upon  little  boys.^ 
He  also  asserted  that  he  had  formed  a  boy  by  turning  air 
into  water  and  the  water  into  blood,  and  then  solidifying 
this  into  flesh,  a  feat  which  he  regarded  as  superior  to  the 
creation  of  Adam  from  earth.  Later  Simon  unmade  him 
and  restored  him  to  the  air,  "but  not  until  I  had  placed  his 
image  and  picture  in  my  bedchamber  as  a  proof  and  me- 
morial of  my  work.^  Not  only  does  Simon  himself  make 
such  boasts ;  Niceta  and  Aquila,  who  had  been  his  disciples 
before  their  conversion  by  Zaccheus,  also  bear  witness  to 

^  Recogs.,  X,  22  and  25.  sias. 

'  But    by    no    means    always    in  Necromancy  is  given  as  a  proof 

early     Christian     writings :     thus  of  the  immortality  of  the  soul  in 

Clement     of     Alexandria      (ciso-  Justin's    First    Apology,    cap.    18, 

C220)    in  the  Stromata,   II,   i,  as-  where    we    read,    "For    let    even 

serts     that    the    Greeks     eulogize  necromancy,    and    the    divinations 

"astrology    and    mathematics    and  you  practise  by  means  of  immacu- 

magic  and  sorcery"  as  the  highest  late  children,  and  the  evoking  of 

sciences.  departed       human       souls  ...  let 

*  In  contrast  to  Lucian's  Menip-  these  persuade  you  that  even  after 
pus  or  Necromancy,  in  which  the  death  souls  are  in  a  state  of  sen- 
Cynic    philosopher    Menippus    re-  sation." 
sorts   to   a  Magus  at    Babylon   in  *  Recogs.,  I,  5. 
order    to    gain    entrance    to    the  ^Recogs.,  II,  9. 
lower   world  and   question   Teire-  °  Recogs.,  II,  15. 


XVII       THE  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS        417 

his  amazing  feats.  "Who  would  not  be  astonished  at  the 
wonderful  things  which  he  does?  Who  would  not  think 
that  he  was  a  god  come  down  from  heaven  for  the  salvation 
of  men?"  ^  He  can  fly  through  the  air,  or  so  mingle  him- 
self with  fire  as  to  become  one  body  with  it,  he  can  make 
statues  walk  and  dogs  of  brass  bark.  "Yea,  he  has  also 
been  seen  to  make  bread  of  stones,"  ^  When  Dositheus  tried 
to  beat  Simon,  the  rod  passed  through  his  body  as  if  it  had 
been  smoke.^  The  woman  called  Luna  who  goes  about  with 
Simon  was  seen  by  a  crowd  to  look  out  of  all  the  windows 
of  a  tower  at  the  same  time,"*  an  illusion  possibly  produced 
by  mirrors.  When  Simon  fears  arrest,  he  transforms  the 
face  of  Faustinianus  into  the  likeness  of  his  own,  in  order 
that  Faustinianus  may  be  arrested  in  his  place. ^ 

So  great,  indeed,  are  the  marvels  wrought  by  Simon    How  dis- 
and  by  magicians  generally  that  Niceta  asks  Peter  how  they   rniracie 

may   be    distinguished    from    divine    signs    and    Christian    ^'"o"?  ., 
.  .  .  magic  ? 

miracles,  and  in  what  respect  anyone  sins  who  infers  from 

the  similarity  of  these  signs  and  wonders  either  that  Simon 
Magus  is  divine  or  that  Christ  was  a  magician.  Speaking 
first  of  Pharaoh's  magicians,  Niceta  asks,  "For  if  I  had 
been  there,  should  I  not  have  thought,  from  the  fact  that 
the  magicians  did  like  things  (to  those  which  Moses  did), 
either  that  Moses  was  a  magician,  or  that  the  feats  dis- 
played by  the  magicians  were  divinely  wrought?  .  .  .  But 
if  he  sins  who  believes  those  who  work  signs,  how  shall  it 
appear  that  he  also  does  not  sin  who  has  believed  on  our 
Lord  for  His  signs  and  occult  virtues?"  Peter's  reply  is 
that  Simon's  magic  does  not  benefit  anyone,  while  the  Chris- 
tian miracles  of  healing  the  sick  and  expelling  demons  are 
performed  for  the  good  of  humanity.  To  Antichrist  alone 
among  workers  of  magic  will  it  be  permitted  at  the  end  of 
the  world  to  mix  in  some  beneficial  acts  with  his  evil  marvels. 
Moreover,  "by  this  means  going  beyond  his  bounds,  and 

^  Recogs.,  II,  6.  *  Recogs.,  II,  12. 

'^ Recogs.,  Ill,  57,  "Recogs.,  X,  53,  et  seq. 

^Recogs.,  II,  11. 


4i8  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

being  divided  against  himself,  and  fighting  against  himself, 
he  shall  be  destroyed."  ^  Later  in  The  Recognitions,  how- 
ever, Aquila  states  that  even  the  magic  of  the  present  has 
found  ways  of  imitating  by  contraries  the  expulsion  of 
demons  by  the  word  of  God,  that  it  can  counteract  the 
poisons  of  serpents  by  incantations,  and  can  effect  cures 
"contrary  to  the  word  and  power  of  God."  He  adds,  "The 
magic  art  has  also  discovered  ministries  contrary  to  the 
angels  of  God,  placing  the  evocation  of  souls  and  the  fig- 
ments of  demons  in  opposition  to  these."  - 
Deceit  in  But  while  the  marvels  of  magic  are  admitted,  there  is  a 

magic.  feeling  that  there  is  something  deceitful  and  unreal  about 

them.  The  teachings  of  the  true  prophet,  we  are  told,  "con- 
tain nothing  subtle,  nothing  composed  by  magic  art  to  de- 
ceive," ^  while  Simon  is  "a  deceiver  and  magician."  "*  Nor 
is  he  deceitful  merely  in  his  religious  teaching  and  his  op- 
position to  Peter;  even  his  boasts  of  magic  power  are  partly 
false.  Aquila,  his  former  disciple,  says,  "But  when  he  spoke 
thus  of  the  production  of  sprouts  and  the  perforation  of  the 
mountain,  I  was  confounded  on  this  account,  because  he 
wished  to  deceive  even  us,  in  whom  he  seemed  to  place  con- 
fidence; for  we  knew  that  those  things  had  been  from  the 
days  of  our  fathers,  which  he  represented  as  having  been 
done  by  himself  lately."  ^  Moreover,  not  only  does  Simon 
deceive  others;  he  is  himself  deceived  by  demons  as  Peter 
twice  asserts :  ^  "He  is  deluded  by  demons,  yet  he  thinks 
that  he  sees  the  very  substance  of  the  soul."  "Although  in 
this  he  is  deluded  by  demons,  yet  he  has  persuaded  himself 
that  he  has  the  soul  of  a  murdered  boy  ministering  to  him 
in  whatever  he  pleases  to  employ  it." 

This  story  of  having  sacrificed  a  pure  boy  for  purposes 
of  magic  or  divination  was  a  stock  charge,  which  we 
have  previously  heard  made  against  Apollonius  of  Tyana 
and  which  was  also  told  of  the  early  Christians  by  their 

^Recogs.,  Ill,  57-60;  X,  66.  *Recogs.,  II,  5. 

'Recogs.,  VIII,  53.  ' Recogs.,  II,  10. 

'Recogs.,  VIII,  60.  'Recogs.,  II,  16,  and  III,  49. 


XVII       THE  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS        419 

pagan  enemies  and  of  the  Jews  and  heretics  in  the  middle 
ages.  Simon  is  said  to  have  confessed  to  Niceta  and  Aquila, 
when  they  asked  how  he  worked  his  magic,  that  he  received 
assistance  from  "the  soul  of  a  boy,  unsullied  and  violently 
slain,  and  invoked  by  unutterable  adjurations."  He  went 
on  to  explain  that  "the  soul  of  man  holds  the  next  place  after 
God,  when  once  it  is  set  free  from  the  darkness  of  the  body. 
And  immediately  it  acquires  prescience,  wherefore  it  is  in- 
voked in  necromancy."  When  Aquila  asked  why  the  soul 
did  not  take  vengeance  upon  its  slayer  instead  of  perform- 
ing the  behests  of  magicians,  Simon  answered  that  the  soul 
now  had  the  last  judgment  too  vividly  before  it  to  indulge 
in  vengeance,  and  that  the  angels  presiding  over  -such  souls 
do  not  permit  them  to  return  to  earth  unless  "adjured  by 
someone  greater  than  themselves."  ^  Niceta  then  indig- 
nantly interposed,  "And  do  you  not  fear  the  day  of  judg- 
ment, who  do  violence  to  angels  and  invoke  souls?"  As  a 
matter  of  fact,  the  charge  that  Simon  had  murdered  or  vio- 
lently slain  a  boy  is  rather  overdrawn,  since  the  boy  in  ques- 
tion was  the  one  whom  he  had  made  from  air  in  the  first 
place  and  whom  he  simply  turned  back  into  air  again,  claim- 
ing, however,  to  have  thereby  produced  an  unsullied  human 
soul.  According  to  The  HonCilies,  however,  he  presently 
confided  to  Niceta  and  Aquila  that  the  human  soul  did  not 
survive  the  death  of  the  body  and  that  a  demon  really 
responded  to  his  invocations.^ 

Nevertheless,  the  charge  of  murder  thus  made  against    Magic  is 
Simon  illustrates  the  criminal  character  here  as  usually  as-   ^^*'- 
scribed  to  magic.     Simon  is  said  to  be  "wicked  above  meas- 
ure," and  to  depend  upon  "magic  arts  and  wicked  devices," 
and   Peter   accuses   him   of    "acting  by   nefarious   arts."  ^ 

^  Similarly,    in    a    passage    con-  names  of  superior  angels,  who  in 

tained   only   in    The   Homilies,  V,  their  turn  may  be  adjured  by  the 

5,  Appion,  recommending  to  Clem-  name  of  God. 

ent   a   love   incantation   which   he  *  Concerning       this       boy       see 

had    learned     from    an     Egyptian  Recogs.,     II,     13-15;     III,     44-45; 

who    was    well    versed    in    magic,  Homilies,  II,  25-30. 

explains    that    demons    obey    the  ^Recogs.,  II,  6;  III,  13. 
magician    when    invoked    by    the 


420  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

Simon  in  his  turn  calls  Peter  "a  magician,  a  godless  man, 
injurious,    cunning,    ignorant,   and    professing   impossibili- 
ties," and  again  "a  magician,  a  sorcerer,  a  murderer."  ^ 
Magic  is  A    further    characteristic    of    magic    which    comes    out 

an  art.  clearly  in  The  Recognitions  is  that  it  is  an  art.  Demons 
and  souls  of  the  dead  may  have  a  great  deal  to  do  with  it, 
but  it  also  requires  a  human  operator  and  makes  use  of 
materials  drawn  from  the  world  of  nature.  It  was  by 
anointing  his  face  with  an  ointment  which  the  magician  had 
compounded  that  the  countenance  of  Faustinianus  was 
transformed  into  the  likeness  of  Simon,  while  Appion  and 
Anubion,  who  anointed  their  faces  with  the  juice  of  a  cer- 
tain herb,  were  thereby  enabled  still  to  recognize  Faus- 
tinianus as  himself.^  In  another  passage  one  of  Simon's 
disciples  who  has  deserted  him  and  come  to  Peter  tells  how 
Simon  had  made  him  carry  on  his  back  to  the  seashore  a 
bundle  "of  his  polluted  and  accursed  secret  things."  Simon 
took  the  bundle  out  to  sea  in  a  boat  and  later  returned 
without  it.^  Simon  not  only  employed  natural  materials 
in  his  magic,  but  was  regarded  as  a  learned  man,  even  by 
his  enemies.  He  is  "by  profession  a  magician,  yet  exceed- 
ingly well  trained  in  Greek  literature."  *  He  is  "a  most 
vehement  orator,  trained  in  the  dialectic  art,  and  in  the 
meshes  of  syllogisms ;  and  what  is  most  serious  of  all,  he 
is  greatly  skilled  in  the  magic  art."  ^  And  he  engages  with 
Peter  in  theological  debates.  It  is  also  interesting  to  note 
as  an  illustration  of  the  connection  between  magic  and 
experimental  science  that  Simon,  in  boasting  of  his  feats 
of  magic,  says,  "For  already  I  have  achieved  many  things 
by  way  of  experiment."  ^ 

In  the  Pseudo-Clementines  we  are  told  that  Simon  in- 
tended to  go  to  Rome,  but  The  Recognitions  and  The 
Homilies  deal  only  with  the  conflicts  between  Peter  and 
Simon  in  various  Syrian  cities  and  do  not  follow  them  to 

*  Recogs.,  Ill,  73  J  X,  54.  "  Recogs.,  II,  5. 

'Recpgs.,  X,  58.  _  "Recogs.,   II,   9,   "Multa   etenim 

'Recogs.,  Ill,  63.  iam  mihi  experimenti  causa  con- 

*  Recogs.,  II,  7.  summata   sunt." 


xvii       THE  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS        421 

Rome,  where,  as  other  Christian  writers  tell  us,  they  had  yet  Other 
other  encounters  in  which  Simon  finally  came  to  his  bitter  of  Simon 
end.  Justin  Martyr,  writing  about  the  middle  of  the  second  ^^sus: 
century,  states  that  Simon,  a  Samaritan  of  Gitto,  came  to  Martyr  to 
Rome  in  the  reign  of  Claudius  and  performed  such  feats  of  tus_ 
magic  by  demon  aid  that  a  statue  was  erected  to  him  as  a  god. 
In  this  matter  of  the  statue  Justin  is  thought  to  have  con- 
fused Semo  Sancus,  a  Sabine  deity,  with  Simon.  Justin  adds 
that  almost  all  Samaritans  and  a  few  persons  from  other 
nations  still  believe  in  Simon  as  the  first  God,  and  that  a 
disciple  of  his,  named  Menander,  deceived  many  by  magic  at 
Antioch.  Justin  complains  that  the  followers  of  these  men 
are  still  called  Christians  and  on  the  other  hand  that  the  em- 
perors do  not  persecute  them  as  they  do  other  Christians,  al- 
though Justin  charges  them  with  practicing  promiscuous 
sexual  intercourse  as  well  as  magic. ^  Irenaeus  gives  a  very 
similar  account.^  Origen,  as  we  have  seen,  denied  that  there 
were  more  than  thirty  of  Simon's  followers  left,^  but  his  con- 
temporary Tertullian  wrote,  "At  this  very  time  even  the 
heretical  dupes  of  this  same  Simon  are  so  much  elated 
by  the  extravagant  pretensions  of  their  art,  that  they  under- 
take to  bring  up  from  Hades  the  souls  of  the  prophets  them- 
selves. And  I  suppose  that  they  can  do  so  under  cover  of 
a  lying  wonder."  ^  But  Origen  and  Tertullian  add  nothing 
to  the  story  of  Simon  Magus  himself.  Hippolytus,  too, 
implies  that  Simon  still  has  followers,  since  he  devotes  a 
number  of  chapters  to  stating  and  refuting  Simon's  doc- 
trines and  to  "teaching  anew  the  parrots  of  Simon  that 
Christ  .  .  .  was  not  Simon."  ®  But  Hippolytus  also  gives 
further  details  concerning  Simon's  visit  to  Rome,  stating 
that  he  there  encountered  the  apostles  and  was  repeatedly 
opposed  by  Peter,  until  finally  Simon  declared  that  if  he 
were  buried  alive  he  would  rise  again  upon  the  third  day. 

'^  First    Apology,    caps.    26    and  *  Tertullian,  De  anima,  cap.  57, 

56;  Dialogue  ii-ith  Trypho,  120.  in  PL,  II,  794;  De  idolatria,  cap. 

'Adv.  itaer.,  I,  23.  9- 
'See  above,  chapter  15,  p.  365.         ^ Philosophumena,  VI,  2-15. 


422 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Peter's 
account 
in  the 

Didascalia 
et  Cousti- 
tntioncs 
Aposto- 
lorum. 


His  disciples  buried  him,  as  they  were  directed,  but  he  never 
reappeared,  "for  he  was  not  the  Christ." 

Peter  himself  is  represented  as  briefly  recounting  his 
struggle  at  Rome  with  Simon  Magus  in  the  Didascalia 
Apostolorum,  an  apocryphal  work  of  probably  the  third 
century,  extant  in  Syriac  and  Latin,  and  more  fully  in 
the  parallel  passage  of  the  Greek  Constitutioncs  Apostolo- 
rum, written  perhaps  about  400  A.  D.^  Peter  found 
Simon  at  Rome  drawing  many  away  from  the  church 
as  well  as  seducing  the  Gentiles  by  his  "magic  operation  and 
virtues,"  or,  in  the  Greek  version,  "magic  experiments  and 
the  working  of  demons."  ^  In  the  Syriac  and  Latin  ac- 
count Peter  then  states  that  one  day  he  saw  Simon  flying 
through  the  air.  "And  standing  beneath  I  said,  'In  the  virtue 
of  the  holy  name,  Jesus,  I  cut  off  your  virtues.'  And  so 
falling  he  broke  the  arch  (thigh?)  of  his  foot  (leg?)."  ^ 
But  he  did  not  die,  since  Peter  goes  on  to  say  that  while 
"many  then  departed  from  him,  others  who  were  worthy 
of  him  remained  with  him."  In  the  longer  Greek  version 
Simon  announced  his  flight  in  the  theater.  While  all  eyes 
were  turned  on  Simon,  Peter  prayed  against  him.  Mean- 
while Simon  mounted  aloft  into  mid-air,  borne  up,  Peter 
says,  by  demons,  and  telling  the  people  that  he  was  ascending 
to  heaven,  whence  he  would  return  bringing  them  good  tid- 
ings. The  people  applauded  him  as  a  god,  but  Peter  stretched 
forth  his  hands  to  heaven,  supplicating  God  through  the 
Lord  Jesus  to  dash  down  the  corrupter  and  curtail  the 
power  of  the  demons.  He  asked  further,  however,  that 
Simon  might  not  be  killed  by  his  fall  but  merely  bruised. 
Peter  also  addressed  Simon  and  the  evil  powers  who  were 
supporting  him,  requiring  that  he  might  fall  and  become  a 
laughing-stock  to  those  who  had  been  deceived  by  him. 
Thereupon  Simon  fell  with  a  great  commotion  and  bruised 

*  F.  X.  Funk,  Didascalia  ct  Con-  *".  .  .  in  una  die  procedens  vidi 

stitutiones  Apostolorum,  1905,  I,  ilium  per  aera  volantem  et_  fere- 
320-1.  batur.       Et     subsistcns    dixi :     In 

'  TO.  hi  Wv7)  f^i(TT03v  /xa7"<S  eMTfipt^i  virtutc  sancti  nominis  lesu  excido 
Ktti  bainovM-  ivtpytlq..  virtutcs  tuas.     F.t  sic  rucns  femur 

pedis  sui   fregit." 


XVII       THE  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS 


423 


his  bottom  and  the  soles  of  his  feet.  It  will  be  noted  that 
here,  as  in  the  accounts  by  some  other  authors,  Peter  alone 
struggles  with  Simon  Magus,  lending  color  to  the  Tiibingen 
theory  once  suggested  in  connection  with  the  Pseudo- 
Clementines,  that  Simon  Magus  is  meant  to  represent  the 
apostle  Paul. 

Arnobius,  writing  about  300  A.  D.,  gives  a  somewhat 
different  account  of  Simon's  mode  of  flight  and  fall.  He 
says  that  the  people  of  Rome  "saw  the  chariot  of  Simon 
Magus  and  his  four  fiery  horses  blown  away  by  the  mouth 
of  Peter  and  vanish  at  the  name  of  Christ.  They  saw,  I 
say,  him  who  had  trusted  false  gods  and  been  betrayed 
by  them  in  their  fright  precipitated  by  his  own  weight  and 
lying  with  broken  legs.  Then,  after  he  had  been  carried 
to  Brunda,  worn  out  by  his  shame  and  sufferings,  he  again 
hurled  himself  down  from  the  highest  ridge  of  the  roof,"  * 
Cyril  of  Jerusalem,  315-386  A.  D.,  also  speaks  of  Simon's 
being  borne  in  air  in  the  chariot  of  demons,  "and  is  not 
surprised  that  the  combined  prayers  of  Peter  and  Paul 
brought  him  down,  since  in  addition  to  Jesus's  promise  to 
answer  the  petition  of  two  or  three  gathered  together  it  is 
to  be  remembered  that  Peter  carried  the  keys  of  heaven  and 
that  Paul  had  been  rapt  to  the  third  heaven  and  heard  secret 
words.^  Philastrius,  another  writer  of  the  fourth  century, 
describes  Simon's  death  more  vaguely,  stating  that  after 
Peter  had  driven  him  from  Jerusalem  he  came  to  Rome 
where  they  engaged  in  another  contest  before  Nero.  Simon 
was  worsted  by  Peter  on  every  point  of  argument,  and, 
"smitten  by  an  angel  died  a  merited  death  in  order  that  the 
falsity  of  his  magic  might  be  evident  to  all  men."  ^  But 
it  is  hardly  worth  while  to  pile  up  such  brief  allusions  to 
Simon  in  the  writings  of  the  fathers.^ 


Arnobius, 
Cyril,  and 
Philas- 
trius. 


Arnobius,  Adversus  gentes,  II, 


12. 


"Cyril,  Cathechesis,  VI,  15,  in 
PG  33,  564. 

*  Filastrii  diversarum  hereseon 
liber,  cap.  23,  ed.  F.  Marx,   1898, 


in  CSEL;  also  in  PL,  vol.  12. 

*  Sulpicius  Severus,  363-420, 
Chron.,  II,  28,  and  Theodoret, 
0386-456,  Haereticarum  fabularum 
compendium,  I,  i  (PG  83,  344) 
have  nothing  new  to  say. 


424  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

Apocry-  Other  fuller  accounts  of  Simon's  doing's  at  Rome  are 

oh^l  Acts 

of  Peter  contained  in  the  Syriac  Teaching  of  Simon  Cephas  ^  and  in 
and  Paul.  ^^^  apochryphal  Acts  of  Peter  and  Paitl.^  In  the  former 
Peter  urges  the  people  of  Rome  not  to  allow  the  sorcerer 
Simon  to  delude  them  by  semblances  which  are  not  realities, 
and  he  raises  a  dead  man  to  life  after  Simon  has  failed 
to  do  so.  In  the  latter  work  Simon  opposes  Peter  and  Paul 
in  the  presence  of  Nero  and  as  usual  they  charge  one  another 
with  being  magicians.  Simon  also  as  usual  affirms  that  he 
is  Christ,  and  we  are  told  that  the  chief  priests  had  called 
Jesus  a  wizard,  Simon  had  already  made  a  great  impres- 
sion upon  Nero  by  causing  brazen  serpents  to  move  and 
stone  statues  to  laugh,  and  by  altering  both  his  face  and 
stature  and  changing  first  to  a  child  and  then  to  an  old  man. 
Nero  also  asserts  that  Simon  has  raised  a  dead  man  and 
that  Simon  himself  rose  on  the  third  day  after  being  be- 
headed. It  is  later  explained,  however,  that  Simon  had 
arranged  to  have  the  beheading  take  place  in  a  dark  corner 
and  through  his  magic  had  substituted  a  ram  for  himself. 
The  ram  appeared  to  be  Simon  until  after  it  had  been  de- 
capitated, when  the  executioner  discovered  that  the  head  was 
that  of  a  ram  but  did  not  dare  report  the  fact  to  Nero. 
When  Simon  met  the  apostles  in  Nero's  presence,  he  caused 
great  dogs  to  rush  suddenly  at  Peter,  but  Peter  made  them 
vanish  into  air  by  showing  them  some  bread  which  he  had 
been  secretly  blessing  and  breaking.  As  a  final  test  Simon 
promised  to  ascend  to  heaven  if  Nero  would  build  him  a 
tower  in  the  Campus  Martins,  where  "my  angels  may  find 
me  in  the  air,  for  they  cannot  come  to  me  upon  earth  among 
sinners."  The  tower  was  duly  provided,  and  Simon,  crowned 
with  laurel,  began  to  fly  successfully  until  Peter,  tearfully 
entreated  by  Paul  to  make  haste,  adjured  the  angels  of 
Satan  who  were  supporting  Simon  to  let  him  drop.  Simon 
then  fell  upon  the  Sacra  Via  and  his  body  was  broken  into 

*AN,  VIII,  673-5.  Greek    scholar,    Constantine   Las- 

'  Ibid.,    477-85 ;     Greek    text    in  caris,  translated  part  of  the  work 

Tischendorf,     Acta     Apostolorum  into  Latin  in  1490. 

Apocrypha,    1851,    pp.    1-39.      The 


XVII       THE  RECOGNiriONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS        425 

four  parts. ^  Nero,  however,  chose  to  regard  the  apostles 
as  Simon's  murderers  and  put  them  to  death,  after  which 
a  Marcellus,  who  had  been  Simon's  disciple  but  left  him  to 
join  Peter,  secretly  buried  Peter's  body. 

To  this  Marcellus  is  ascribed  a  very  similar  narrative  An 
which  is  found  in  an  early  medieval  manuscript  and  was  ascribed  to 
perhaps  written  in  the  seventh  or  eighth  century.^  Fabricius  Marcellus. 
and  Florentinus  give  its  title  as,  Of  the  marvelous  deeds 
and  acts  of  the  blessed  Peter  and  Paid  and  of  Simon  s  magic 
arts.^  I  have  read  it  in  a  Latin  pamphlet  printed  at  some 
time  before  1500,  where  the  full  title  runs :  The  Passion  of 
the  Apostles  Peter  and  Paul,  and  their  disputation  before 
the  emperor  Nero  against  Simon,  a  certain  magician,  who, 
when  he  saw  that  he  could  not  resist  the  utterances  of  St. 
Peter,  cast  all  his  books  of  mugic  into  the  sea  lest  he  be 
adjudged  a  magician.  Then  when  the  same  Simon  Magus 
presumed  to  ascend  to  heaven,  overcome  by  St.  Peter  he 
fell  to  earth  and  perished  most  miserably.  At  its  close  occurs 
the  statement,  "I,  Marcellus,  a  disciple  of  my  lord,  the 
apostle  Peter,  have  written  what  I  saw."  When  this  Mar- 
cellus began  to  desert  his  former  master,  Simon,  to  follow 
Peter,  Simon  procured  a  big  dog  to  keep  Peter  away  from 
Marcellus,  but  at  Peter's  order  the  dog  turned  upon  Simon 
himself.  Peter  then  humanely  forbade  the  beast  to  do  Simon 
any  serious  bodily  injury,  but  the  dog  tore  the  magician's 
clothing  off  his  back,  and  Simon  was  chased  from  town 
by  the  mob  and  did  not  venture  to  return  until  after  a 
year's  time.* 

*Mead  (1892),  p.  37,  notes  that  Synodi   ad  Imp.    Const.  Act.   18) 

Dr.    Salmon    (article  Simon   Ma-  compare  Simon's  flight  with  that 

gus    in    Diet.    Chris.    Biog.    IV,  of  Icarus. 

686)  "connects  this  with  the  story,  '  Tischendorf   (1851),  p.  xix. 

told  by  Suetonius  and  Dio  Chrys-  '  "De   mirificis   rebus   et   actibus 

ostom,      that      Nero      caused      a  beatorum    Petri    et    Pauli,    et    de 

wooden   theater  to  be  erected   in  magicis    artibus    Simonis :"    Fab- 

the  Carnpus,  and  that  a  gymnast  ricius,  Cod.  apocr.,  Ill,  632;  Flo- 

who    tried    to    play    the    part    of  rentinus,     Martyrologium    Hiero- 

Icarus    fell   so   near  the   emperor  nymi,  103. 

as  to  bespatter  him  with  blood."  *  A  slightly  different  version  of 

Hegesippus  {De  bello  judaico,  III,  the  dog   incident  is   found  in  the 

2),  Abdias   {Hist,  i),  and  Maxi-  Acts  of  Nereus  and  Achilles  {AS, 

mus      Taurinensis      {Pair.      Vl,  May  III,  9). 


426 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Hege- 
sippus. 


A  ser- 
mon on 
Simon's 
fall. 


A  chapter  is  devoted  to  Simon  Magus  in  the  History  of 
the  Jewish  War  of  the  so-called  Hegesippus,  a  name  which 
is  thought  to  be  a  corruption  of  Josephus,  since  the  work  in 
large  measure  reproduces  that  historian.  At  any  rate  it 
was  not  written  until  the  fourth  century  and  is  probably 
a  translation  or  adaptation  by  Ambrose.  Its  account  of 
Simon  Magus  combines  the  story  of  his  competition  with 
Peter  in  raising  the  dead,  "for  in  such  works  Peter  was  held 
most  celebrated,"  with  that  of  his  flight  and  fall.  He  is 
represented  as  launching  his  flight  from  the  Capitoline  Hill 
and  leaping  off  the  Tarpeian  rock.  The  people  marveled 
at  his  flight,  some  remarking  that  Christ  had  never  per- 
formed such  a  feat  as  this.  But  when  Peter  prayed  against 
him,  "straightway  his  propeller  was  tangled  up  in  Peter's 
voice,  and  he  fell,  nor  was  he  killed,  but,  weakened  by  a 
broken  leg,  withdrew  to  Aricia  and  died  there."  ^ 

Finally,  passing  over  other  Latin  accounts  of  the  con- 
test between  the  apostles  and  Simon  Magus  to  be  found  in 
the  Apostolic  Histories  of  the  Pseudo-Abdias  ^  and  in  a 
work  ascribed  to  Pope  Linus,^  we  may  note  a  sermon  which 
has  been  variously  ascribed  in  the  manuscripts  and  printed 
editions  to  Augustine,  Ambrose,  and  Maximus.*  This  ser- 
mon, intended  for  the  anniversary  of  the  day  of  martyrdom 
of  Peter  and  Paul,  proceeds  to  inquire  the  cause  of  their 
death  and  finds  it  in  the  fact  that  among  other  marvels  they 
"prostrated  by  their  prayers  that  magician  Simon  in  a 
headlong  fall  from  the  empty  air.  For  when  the  same 
Simon  called  himself  Christ  and  asserted  that  as  the  Son 
he  could  ascend  unto  the  Father  by  flying,  and,  suddenly 


^Hegesippus,  III,  2  ed.  C.  F. 
Weber  and  J.  Caesar,  Marburg, 
1864,  "et  statim  in  voce  Petri  im- 
pHcatiis  remigiis  alarum  quas 
sumserat  corruit,  nee  exanimatus 
est,  sed  fracto  debilitatus  crure 
Ariciam  concessit  atque  ibi  mor- 
tuus  est."  I  earnestly  recommend 
this  passage  to  those  who  delight 
in  finding  ancient  precursors  of 
modern  inventions  as  an  example 
of    remarkable    insight    into    the 


effect  of  air-waves  upon  delicate 
mechanisms. 

^  ed.  Fabricius,  Cod.  apocr.,  I, 
411 ;  AS,  June  V,  424. 

^  Biblioth.  Patrum,  Cologne, 
1618,  I,  70. 

*  Printed  PL,  39,  2121-2,  among 
the  works  of  Augustine,  Ser- 
moncs  Supposititi,  CCII.  The 
greater  number  of  MSS  assign  it 
to  Maximus. 


XVII        THE  RECOGNITIONS  AND  SIMON  MAGUS        427 

raised  up  by  magic  arts,  began  to  fly,  then  Peter  on  his  knees 
prayed  the  Lord,  and  by  sacred  prayer  overcame  the  magical 
levitation.  For  the  prayer  ascended  to  the  Lord  before  the 
flier,  and  the  just  petition  arrived  ere  the  iniquitous  presump- 
tion. Peter,  I  say,  though  placed  on  the  ground,  obtained 
what  he  sought  before  Simon  reached  the  heaven  towards 
which  he  was  tending.  So  then  Peter  brought  him  down 
Hke  a  captive  from  high  in  air,  and,  falling  precipitately 
upon  a  rock,  he  broke  his  legs.  And  this  in  contumely  of 
his  feat,  so  that  he  who  just  before  had  tried  to  fly,  of  a  sud- 
den could  not  even  walk,  and  he  who  had  assumed  wings 
lost  even  his  feet.  But  lest  it  appear  strange  that,  while  the 
apostle  was  present,  that  magician  should  fly  through  the 
air  even  for  a  while,  let  it  be  explained  that  this  was  due  to 
Peter's  patience.  For  he  let  him  soar  the  higher  in  order 
that  he  might  fall  the  farther ;  for  he  wished  him  to  be  car- 
ried aloft  where  everyone  could  see  him,  in  order  that  all 
might  see  him  when  he  fell  from  on  high."  The  preacher 
then  draws  the  moral  that  pride  goes  before  a  fall. 

The  struggle  of  Peter  and  Paul  with  Simon  Magus  at  Simon 
Rome  appears  in  The  Golden  Legend,  compiled  by  Jacopo  medieval 
de  Voragine  in  the  thirteenth  century,  and  was  likewise  a  ^''*- 
favorite  theme  of  Gothic  stained  glass.     At  Chartres  and 
Angers  Peter  may  be  seen  routing  Simon's  dogs  by  blessing 
bread;  at  Bourges  and  Lyons  Simon  and  Peter  compete  in 
raising   the   dead;   while    windows   at   Chartres,    Bourges, 
Tours,  Reims,  and  Poitiers  show  the  apostles  praying  and 
Simon  falling  and  breaking  his  neck.^     This  last  scene  and 
also  the   disputation  before   Nero   are   represented   in   the 
earlier  mosaics  of  the  eleventh  or  twelfth  century  which 
the  Norman  rulers  of  Sicily  had  executed  in  the  cathedral 
of  Monreale  and  the  royal  chapel  of  their  castle  at  Palermo.^ 

*  Male,  Religious  Art  in  France,  legend  reads,  "Hie  praecepto  Petri 

1913,    p.   297,   notes    3    and   4;    p.  oratione      Pauli     Simon      Magus 

298,  note  I.  cccidit     in      terrain," — "Here      at 

'  The    two    representations    are  Peter's      command      and      Paul's 

essentially    identical.     Simon    falls  prayer     Simon     Magus     falls     to 

head  first,  and  the  accompanying  earth." 


CHAPTER  XVIII 

THE    CONFESSION   OF    CYPRIAN   AND   SOME   SIMILAR   STORIES 

The  Confession  of  Cyprian— His  initiation  into  mysteries — His  thor- 
ough study  of  nature,  divination,  and  magic — The  lore  of  Egypt — And 
of  Chaldea — Cyprian's  practice  of  magic  at  Antioch — A  Christian  virgin 
defeats  the  magic  of  the  demons — Summary  of  Cyprian's  picture  oi 
magic — Christians  accused  of  magic — A  story  from  Epiphanius — 
Joseph's  experience  of  miracle  and  magic — Legend  of  St.  James  and 
Hermogenes  the  magician — Other  contests  of  apostles  and  magicians 
in  The  Golden  Legend. 

TheCon-  To  the  accounts  of  the  contests  of  Peter  and  Paul  with 
Cyprian.  Simon  Magus  which  were  recorded  in  our  last  chapter  we 
shall  add  in  this  some  other  encounters  of  early  Christians 
with  magicians,  and  to  the  picture  of  magic  contained  in 
the  Pseudo-Clementines  that  presented  by  Cyprian  in  his 
Confession.  If  Simon  Magus  died  impenitent  in  the  midst 
of  his  magic,  very  different  was  the  end  of  Cyprian,  a 
magician  by  profession  in  the  third  century,  who,  after  being 
educated  from  childhood  in  heathen  mysteries  and  the  magic 
art,  repented  and  was  baptized,  became  bishop  of  Antioch, 
and  finally  achieved  a  martyr's  crown.  In  the  Confession  ^ 
current  under  his  name  and  which  most  critics  agree  was 
composed  before  the  time  of  Constantine  ^  is  described  his 

*  Greek     and     Latin     text     in  Cyprian  von  Antiochen,  ed.  O.  v. 

parallel    columns     in    AS,     Sept.  Lamm,  1899,  Ethiopic,  Greek,  and 

Vn  (1867),  pp.  204fif.    For  an  ac-  German,      in      Petrograd      Acad. 

count    of    previous    editions    see  Scient.     Imper.     Mcmoires,     VIII 

Ibid.,   p.    182.      Bishop    John    Fell  scrie,  CI.  hist,  philol.,  IV,  6.    Ilpa- 

published  a  Latin  text  from  three  {ts  twi'  ayio^v  iiaprvpccv   Kvirpiavov  Kal 

Oxford  MSS.     In  Digby  30,  15th  Iouo-tii'tjs, with  an  Arabic  version,  ed. 

century,    fol.    29-,    which    I    have  Margaret     D.     Gibson,     1901,     in 

examined,    the    wording    differed  Stndia  Sinaitica,  No.  8. 

considerably     from     that    of     the  'Ibid.,  p.  180,  "ipsa  S.  Cypriana 

Latin     text     in     AS.     The     brief  nomine    vulgata    Confessio    quam 

Martyrium   of    Cyprian    and   Jus-  ante  Constantini  aetatem  scriptam 

tina   follows  in  the  same  volume  esse   critici   plurimi   etiam   rigidi- 

of    AS    at   pp.   224-6.    Sahidische  ores  fatentur." 
BruchstUcke     der     Legende     von 

428 


CHAP.  XVIII      THE  CONFESSION  OF  CYPRIAN 


429 


education  in  and  subsequent  practice  of  magic.  For  us  per- 
haps the  most  interesting  feature  of  his  account  of  his  edu- 
cation is  the  association  of  magic,  not  only  with  pagan 
mysteries  and  the  operations  of  demons,  but  also  with 
natural  science. 

"I  am  Cyprian,"  says  the  author,  "who  from  a  tender 
age  was  consecrated  a  gift  to  Apollo  and  while  yet  a  child 
was  initiated  into  the  arts  of  the  dragon."  When  not  yet 
seven  years  old,  he  entered  the  mysteries  of  Mithra,  and  at 
ten  his  parents  enrolled  him  a  citizen  at  Athens,  and  he  car- 
ried a  torch  in  the  mysteries  of  Demeter  and  "ministered 
to  the  dragon  on  the  citadel  of  Pallas."  When  not  yet 
fifteen,  he  also  visited  Mount  Olympus  for  forty  days,  and 
"was  initiated  into  sonorous  speeches  and  noisy  narra- 
tions." ^  There  he  saw  in  phantasy  trees  and  herbs  which 
seemed  to  be  moved  by  the  presence  of  the  gods,  spirits 
who  regulated  the  passage  of  time,  and  choruses  of  demons 
who  sang,  while  others  waged  war  or  plotted,  deceived,  and 
permeated.^  He  saw  the  phalanx  of  each  god  and  goddess, 
and  how  from  Mount  Olympus  as  from  a  palace  spirits  were 
despatched  to  every  nation  of  the  earth.  He  was  fed  only 
after  sunset  and  upon  fruits,  and  was  taught  the  efficacy  of 
each  of  them  by  seven  hierophants. 

Cyprian's  parents  were  determined  that  he  should  learn 
whatever  there  was  in  earth  and  air  and  sea,  and  not  merely 
the  natural  generation  and  corruption  of  herbs  and  trees 
and  bodies,  but  also  the  virtues  implanted  in  all  these,  which 
the  prince  of  this  world  impressed  upon  them  in  order  that 
he  might  oppose  the  divine  constitution.  Cyprian  also  par- 
ticipated at  Argos  in  the  sacred  rites  of  Hera,  and  saw  the 
union  of  air  with  ether  and  of  ether  with  air,  also  of  earth 
with  water,  and  water  with  air.  He  penetrated  the  Troad 
and  to  Artemis  Tauropolos  who  is  at  Lacedaemon  to  learn 


His  initia- 
tion into 
mysteries. 


His 

thorough 
study  of 
nature, 
divination, 
and  magic. 


*  Ihid.,  p.  205,  "et  initiatus  sum 
sonis  sermonum  ac  strepitum  nar- 
rationibus."  L.  Preller  in  Phi- 
lologus,  I  (1846),  349ff-,  and  A. 
.R.  Cook,  Zeus,  iio-i,  suggest  that 


these    rites    on    Mount    Olympus 
were  Orphic. 

'"Et    aliorum    insidiantium   de- 
cipientium  permiscentium.  .  .  ." 


430  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

how  matter  was  confused  and  divided  "and  the  profundities 
of  sinister  and  cruel  legends."  From  the  Phrygians  he 
learned  liver  divination;  among  the  barbarians  he  studied 
auspices  and  the  significance  of  the  movements  of  quad- 
rupeds, and  how  to  interpret  omens  and  the  language  of 
birds,  and  the  sounds  made  by  every  kind  of  wood  and  stone, 
or  by  the  dead  in  tombs  and  the  creaking  of  doors.  He 
became  acquainted  with  the  palpitations  of  the  limbs,  the 
movement  of  the  blood  and  pulse  in  bodies,  all  the  exten- 
sions and  corollaries  of  ratios  and  numbers,  diseases  simu- 
lated as  well  as  natural,  "and  oaths  which  are  heard  yet  are 
not  audible,  and  pacts  for  discord."  There  was,  in  fine, 
nothing  whatever  in  earth  or  sea  or  air  that  he  did  not 
know,  whether  it  w^as  a  matter  of  science  or  phantasy,  of 
mechanics  or  artifice,  "even  down  to  the  magic  translation 
of  writings  and  other  things  of  that  sort." 
The  lore  At  twenty  Cyprian  was  admitted  to  the  shrines  at  ancient 

of  Egypt.  ]\Iemphis  in  Eg}'pt  and  learned  what  communication  and 
relationship  existed  between  demons  and  earthly  things  and 
"in  what  stars  and  laws  and  objects  they  delight."  He  wit" 
nessed  imitations  of  earthquakes,  rain,  and  storms  at  sea. 
He  saw  the  souls  of  giants  held  in  darkness  and  fancied 
that  they  sustained  the  earth  as  a  load  on  their  shoulders. 
He  saw  the  communications  of  serpents  with  demons,  ideas 
of  transfigurations,  impious  piety,  science  without  reason, 
iniquitous  justice,  and  things  topsy-turvy  generally.  Be- 
sides the  forms  of  various  sins  and  vices,  such  as  fornica- 
tion and  avarice,  which  suggest  the  medieval  personification 
of  the  seven  deadly  sins,  he  saw  the  three  hundred  and  sixty- 
five  varieties  of  ailments,  "and  the  empty  glory  and  the 
empty  virtue"  with  which  the  priests  of  Egypt  had  deceived 
the  Greek  philosophers. 
And  of  At  thirty  Cyprian  left  Eg^-pt  for  Chaldea  in  order  to 

Chaldea.  acquire  its  lore  concerning  air,  fire,  and  light.  Here  he 
was  instructed  in  the  qualities  of  stars  as  well  as  of  herbs, 
and  their  "choruses  like  drawn-up  battle  lines."  He  was 
taught  the   house  and   relationships   of   each   star  and   its 


XVIII  THE  CONFESSION  OF  CYPRIAN  431 

appropriate  food  and  drink.  Also  the  meetings  of  spirits 
with  men  in  Hght,  the  three  hundred  and  sixty-five  demons 
who  divide  as  many  parts  of  the  ether  between  them,  and 
the  sacrifices,  Hbations,  and  words  appropriate  to  each. 
Cyprian's  education  had  now  advanced  to  such  a  point  that 
the  devil  himself  hailed  him,  mere  youth  as  he  was,  as  a 
new  Jambres,  a  skilful  and  reliable  practitioner,  and  worthy 
of  communication  with  himself.  Cyprian  again  explains 
at  this  point  that  in  all  the  stars  and  plants  and  other  works 
of  God  the  devil  has  bound  to  himself  likenesses  in  prep- 
aration to  wage  war  with  God  and  His  angels,  but  these 
likenesses  are  shadowy  images,  'not  solid  substances.  The 
devil's  rain  is  not  water,  his  fire  does  not  burn,  his  fish  are 
not  food,  and  his  gold  is  not  genuine.  The  devil  obtains 
the  material  for  his  products  from  the  vapors  of  sacrifices, 

Cyprian  now  returned  from  Chaldea  and  wrought  mar-   Cyprian's 
vels  at  Antioch  "like  one  of  the  ancients,"  and  "made  many  of^niagic 
experiments  of  magic  and  became  celebrated  as  a  magician   at  Anti- 
and  philosopher  endowed  with  vast  knowledge  of  things 
invisible."     Men  came  to  him  to  be  taught  magic  or  to 
secure  their  ends  by  his  assistance.     And  he  easily  helped 
them  all,  some  to  the  gratification  of  pleasure,  others  to 
triumph  over  their  adversaries  or  even  to  slay  their  rivals. 
His   conscience  sometimes   pricked  him  at   the  evil  deeds 
which  he  thus  wrought  with  the  aid  of  demons,  but  as  yet 
he  did  not  doubt  that  the  devil  was  all  powerful. 

But  then  the  case  of  the  Christian  girl  Justina  revealed   a  Chris- 
to  him  the  weakness  and  fraud  of  the  devil.     Determined   defeats^'" 
to  dedicate  herself  to  a  life  of  virginity,  Justina  repulsed   the  magic 
the  love  of  the  youth  Agla'ides,  who  sought  Cyprian's  assist-   demons, 
ance.    But  in  vain :  the  demon  failed  to  alter  Justina's  deter- 
mination and  was  not  even  able  to  give  another  girl  the 
form  of  Justina  and  so  deceive  Agla'ides.    Justina  was  shown 
the  form  of  her  lover,  but  she  called  upon  the  Virgin,  and  the 
devil  was  forced  to  vanish  in  smoke.     Nor  did  disease  and 
other  plagues  and  torments  affect  her  resolution.     Her  par- 
ents, however,  were  similarly  afflicted  until  they  besought 


432 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Summary 
of  Cypri- 
an's pic- 
ture of 
magic. 


her  to  marry  Aglaides,  but  instead  she  cured  them  of  their 
ailments  by  the  sign  of  the  cross.  The  devil  then  inflicted 
a  plague  on  the  entire  community  and  delivered  an  oracle 
to  the  effect  that  the  pest  could  be  stayed  only  by  the  mar- 
riage of  Justina  and  Aglaides,  but  her  prayers  turned  the 
wrath  of  the  public  from  herself  against  Cyprian.  When 
the  magician  in  disgust  cursed  the  demon  for  the  evil  pass 
to  which  he  had  thus  brought  him,  the  demon  made  a  fero- 
cious attack  upon  him,  from  which  Cyprian  saved  himself 
just  in  the  nick  of  time  by  calling  upon  God  for  aid  and 
making  the  sign  of  the  cross.  He  then  publicly  confessed 
his  crimes  as  a  magician,  burned  his  books  of  magic,  and 
was  baptized  into  the  Christian  faith. ^ 

Cyprian's  Confession  thus  represents  magic  as  a  very 
elaborate  art,  requiring  long  study  and  a  thorough  knowl- 
edge of  natural  objects  and  processes.  The  magician  has 
his  books,  and  he  must  also  be  able  to  read  the  book  of 
nature.  Astrology  and  other  arts  of  divination  are  integral 
parts  of  magic.  But  magic  is  also  represented  as  the  work 
of  evil  spirits.  This  involves  not  merely  a  Neo-Platonic 
sort  of  association  of  demons  with  natural  forces  and 
regions  of  earth  or  sky,  but  also  the  specific  association  of 
the  devil  for  evil  purposes  with  objects  in  nature,  a  doctrine 
which  we  shall  find  again  in  the  works  of  a  medieval  saint, 
Hildegard  of  Bingen.  Furthermore,  magic  aids  in  the  com- 
mission of  crime  and  is  dangerous  even  to  the  magician 
against  whom  the  devil  may  turn.  While  magic  involves 
study  of  nature  and  use  of  natural  forces  and  associations, 
and  we  also  hear  of  "many  experiments  of  magic,"  it  is 
scarcely  represented  as  operating  scientifically  in  the  Confes- 
sion. It  is  mystic,  confused,  shadowy,  imitative,  imaginary, 
lacking  in  solidity  and  reality,  fraudulent  and  deceptive. 
Finally,  this  complex  art,  this  universal  system  of  knowl- 
edge,  is  easily  balked  and  overthrown  by  the   far  simpler 


*  Shelley,  it  may  be  recalled,  in 
1822  translated  some  scenes,  pub- 
lished   in    1824,    from    Calderon's 


Magico  Prodigioso,  in  which 
Cyprian,  Justina,  and  the  demon 
figure. 


XVIII  THE  CONFESSION  OF  CYPRIAN  433 

counter-magic  of  Christianity,  by  such  methods  as  a  prayer 
to  the  Virgin,  calHng  on  the  name  of  God,  or  merely  making 
the  sign  of  the  cross. 

Such  counter-magic  was  apt  to  be  regarded  as  magic  by  Christians 
the  pagans,  and  the  account  of  the  martyrdom  of  Cyprian  of  magic, 
states  that  the  devil,  that  "very  bad  serpent,"  suggested  to 
the  Count  of  the  Orient  that  Cyprian,  together  with  a  cer- 
tain virgin  who  is  assumed  to  be  Justina,  was  destroying 
the  ancient  worship  of  the  gods  by  his  magic  tricks  as  well 
as  stirring  up  the  orient  and  the  whole  world  by  his  epistles. 
He  was  accordingly  arrested  and  finally  beheaded.  Ac- 
cording to  one  account  he  and  Justina  were  first  placed 
together  in  a  cauldron  of  tallow  and  pitch  over  a  fire.  But 
when  they  sang  a  hymn,  the  flames  left  them  uninjured 
and  instead  shot  out  and  caused  the  death  of  an  unreformed 
magician  who  happened  to  be  standing  near  by.^  Another 
case  of  Christian  martyrs  who  were  probably  accused  of 
magic  is  found  in  Spain  about  287  A.  D.  Two  Christian 
sisters  who  were  dealers  in  pottery  refused  to  sell  their 
earthenware  for  purposes  of  pagan  worship.  One  day,  as 
a  pagan  religious  procession  passed  by  their  shop,  the  crowd 
trampled  upon  their  wares  which  were  exposed  for  sale. 
But  thereupon  the  idol  which  was  being  borne  in  the  pro- 
cession fell  and  broke  in  pieces.  "Being  probably  suspected 
of  magical  practices,"  the  two  sisters  were  arrested;  one 
died  in  prison  and  the  other  was  strangled;  whereupon  the 
bishop  rescued  their  bones,  and  these  were  cherished  as  the 
remains  of  martyrs.- 

Epiphanius  in  the  next  century  tells  a  story  similar  to   A  story 
that  of  Cyprian,  Aglaides,  and  Justina,  of  a  youth  who  vvas   Ep^pha- 
led  astray  by  evil  companions  who  employed  magic  arts,   "*"s. 
love   philters,   and    incantations   to    force    free   women   to 
gratify  their  licentious  desires.     By  means  of  magic  the 
youth  went  through  the  air  to  a  very  beautiful  woman  in 

*  Bouchier,   Syria   as  a  Roman         "  Bouchier,  Spain  Under  the  Ro- 
Province,  p.  237.  man   Empire,   p.    123,   citing   AS, 

July  19. 


434 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Joseph's 
experience 
of  miracle 
and  magic. 


Legend  of 
St.  James 
and  Her- 
mogenes 
the 
magician. 


the  public  bath,  but  she  repelled  him  by  making  the  sign  of 
the  cross.  His  companions  then  tried  to  devise  some  more 
powerful  magic  for  his  benefit,  and  took  him  at  sunset  to 
a  cemetery  full  of  caves  where  for  three  successive  nights 
the  wizards  vainly  plied  their  arts  in  the  attempt  to  gratify 
his  lust.  But  in  every  instance  they  were  foiled  by  the 
name  of  Christ  and  the  sign  of  the  cross. ^ 

Joseph,  the  guardian  of  this  same  young  man,  finally 
became  converted  to  Christianity  after  Christ  had  appeared 
repeatedly  to  him  in  dreams  and  cured  him  of  diseases  and 
after  he  himself,  by  employing  the  name  of  Jesus,  had  cured 
a  man  of  a  demoniacal  possession  which  made  him  go 
shamelessly  about  the  town  in  a  nude  state.  After  his  con- 
version, Joseph  started  to  complete  as  a  Christian  church 
an  unfinished  structure  in  Tiberias  called  the  Adrianaion, 
which  the  citizens  previously  had  tried  to  convert  into  a 
public  bath.  When  the  Jews  endeavored  to  ruin  his  un- 
dertaking by  bewitching  the  furnaces  which  he  had  erected 
for  the  preparation  of  quick-lime,  he  counteracted  their 
magic  by  making  the  sign  of  the  cross,  sprinkling  his  fur- 
naces with  holy  water,  and  saying  in  the  name  of  Jesus  of 
Nazareth,  ''Let  there  be  power  in  this  water  to  counteract 
all  pharmacy  and  magic  employed  by  these  men  and  to 
instill  sufficient  energy  into  the  fire  to  complete  the  house 
of  the  Lord."    With  that  his  fires  blazed  up  violently.^ 

Very  similar  both  to  the  Confession  of  Cyprian  and  the 
story  of  Simon  Magus  is  the  legend  of  St.  James  the  Great 


^  Epiphanius,  Panarion,  ed.  Din- 
dorf,  II,  97-104;  ed.  Petavius, 
131A-137C. 

'  Idem.  The  attempt  to  bewitch 
the  furnaces  reminds  one  of  the 
fourteenth  Homeric  epigram,  in 
which  the  bard  threatens  to  curse 
the  potters'  furnaces  if  they  do 
not  pay  him  for  his  song,  and  to 
summon  "the  destroyers  of  fur- 
naces,"— Hivrpiff  o/iojs  Xnapayop 
re  Kal  "AajSerov  -qbi  lia^aKTrjv, — 
words  usually  interpreted  as  names 
for  mischievous  Pucks  and  brawl- 
ing  goblins    who    smash    pottery. 


But  the  two  middle  names  sug- 
gest the  stones,  smaragdus  or 
emerald,  and  asbestos.  The  poet 
also  invokes  "Circe  of  many 
drugs"  to  cast  injurious  spells, 
and  appeals  to  Chiron  to  com- 
plete the  work  of  destruction. 
He  further  prays  that  the  face  of 
any  potter  who  peers  into  the  fur- 
nace may  be  burned.  This  epi- 
gram is  probably  of  late  date. 
See  A.  Abel,  Homeri  Hymni,  Epi- 
grammata,  Batrachomyomachia, 
Lipsiae,  1886,  pp.  123-4, 


XVIII 


THE  CONFESSION  OF  CYPRIAN 


435 


and  Hermogenes  the  magician,  which  is  found  in  The  Golden 
Legend  and  which  was  often  reproduced  in  medieval  stained 
glass  windows.^  James  converted  to  Christianity  a  disciple 
of  Hermogenes  whom  the  magician  had  sent  against  him 
when  he  was  preaching  in  Judea.  When  the  angry  wizard 
cast  a  spell  over  his  erstwhile  disciple,  the  latter  was  freed 
by  means  of  St.  James's  cloak.  When  the  magician  sent 
demons  to  fetch  both  the  convert  and  the  saint,  James  made 
them  bring  Hermogenes  to  him  instead,  but  then  set  him 
free,  telling  him  that  Christians  returned  good  for  evil. 
Hermogenes  now  feared  the  vengeance  that  the  demons 
would  take  upon  himself,  and  so  James  gave  his  staff  to 
him  to  protect  himself  with.  Soon  afterwards  Hermogenes 
threw  all  his  books  of  magic  into  the  sea  and  was  baptized. 
"In  The  Golden  Legend,"  in  fact,  as  Male  says,  "almost 
all  the  apostles  have  to  contend  with  magicians.  But  it  is  St. 
Simon  and  St.  Jude  who  strive  with  the  most  formidable  of 
sorcerers,  and  they  challenge  him  even  in  the  very  sanctuary  in  The 
of  magic  art,  the  temple  of  the  Sun  at  Suanir,  near  Babylon.  ^^^Jj^ 
Undismayed  by  the  science  of  Zoroaster  and  Aphaxad,  they 
foretell  the  future,  they  cause  a  new-born  babe  to  speak, 
they  subdue  tigers  and  serpents,  and  from  a  statue  they 
cast  out  a  demon,  which  shows  itself  in  the  shape  of  a  black 
Ethiopian  and  flees  uttering  raucous  cries."  ^  If  this  last 
exorcism  reminds  us  somewhat  of  the  exploits  of  Apollonius 
of  Tyana,  still  more  do  the  performances  of  St.  An- 
drew, who  "must  surpass  all  the  marvels  of  the  magicians 
before  he  can  convert  Asia  and  Greece.  He  drives  away 
seven  demons  who  in  the  shape  of  seven  great  dogs  desolate 
the  town  of  Nicaea,  and  he  exorcises  a  spirit  which  dwells 
in  the  thermae  and  is  wont  to  strangle  the  bathers."  ^ 


Other  con- 
tests of 
apostles 
and 
magicians 


*  Male,  Religious  Art  in  France, 
1913,  pp.  304-6. 


"Male  (1913),  p.  306. 
"Ibid.j  p.  307. 


CHAPTER  XIX 

ORIGEN  AND  CELSUS 

Celsus'  charges  of  magic  against  Christianity — Hebrew  magic  as 
depicted  by  Celsus — Various  recriminations  of  magic — Origen's  distinc- 
tion between  miracles  and  magic — Origen  frees  Jews  as  well  as  Chris- 
tains  from  the  charge  of  magic — Celsus'  sceptical  description  of  magic 
— Celsus  suggests  a  connection  between  magic  and  occult  virtues  in 
nature — Celsus  on  magicians  and  demons — Origen  ascribes  magic  to 
demons — Magic  is  an  elaborate  art — The  Magi  of  Scripture  were  jiot 
different  from  other  magicians — Origen's  Biblical  commentaries — 
Balaam  and  the  power  of  words — Limitations  to  the  power  of  Pharaoh's 
magicians — Was  Balaam  a  prophet  of  God  or  a  magician? — Balaam's 
magic  experiments — Limitations  to  his  magic  power — Divine  prophecy 
distinct  from  magic  and  divination — The  ventriloquist  really  invoked 
Samuel  for  Saul — Christians  less  affected  by  magic  than  philosophers 
are — Their  superstitious  methods  against  magic — Incantations — The 
power  of  words — Origen  admits  a  connection  between  the  power  of 
words  and  magic — Jewish  and  Christian  employment  of  powerful  narnes 
is  really  magic — Celsus'  theory  of  demons — Origen  calls  demons  wicked 
— But  believes  in  presiding  angels — A  law  of  spiritual  gravitation — 
Attitude  of  Celsus  toward  astrology — Attitude  of  Origen  toward  as- 
trology— Further  discussion  in  his  Commentary  on  Genesis — Problems 
of  the  waters  above  the  firmament  and  of  one  or  more  heavens — 
Augury,  dreams,  and  prophecy— Animals  and  gems — Origen  later  ac- 
cused of  countenancing  magic. 

charges  ^^  ^^^  Celebrated  work  of  Origen  Against  Celsus,^  writ- 
of  magic  ten  in  the  first  half  of  the  third  century,  the  subject  of 
Chri"ti-  magic  is  often  touched  upon,  largely  because  Celsus  in  his 
anity.  True  Discourse  had  so  frequently  brought  charges  of  magic 

against  Jesus,  His  Christian  followers,  and  the  Jewish  peo- 
ple from  whom  they  had  sprung.     Celsus  had  called  Jesus 

*  Greek  text  in  Migne  PG,  Vol.  ferung   dcr  Biicher  des   Origenes 

XL      English    translation    in    the  gegen  Celsus  in  den  Handschrif- 

Antc-Nicene  Fathers,  of   which  I  ten   dieses   VVcrkes  und   der  Phi- 

generally     make     use     in     quota-  lokalia.     Prolegomena     zu     einer 

tions    from    the    work.      On    the  kritischen  Ausgabe,  1889,  157  pp., 

MSS    of    the   Against   Celsus   see  (TU,  VI,  i). 
Paul  Koetschau,  Die  TextUberlie- 

436 


CHAP.  XIX  O  RIG  EN  AND  C  ELS  US  437 

"a  wicked  and  God-hated  sorcerer" ;  ^  had  contended  that 
His  miracles  were  wrought  by  magic,  not  by  divine  power ;  ^ 
and  had  compared  them  unfavorably,  as  less  wonderful,  to 
the  tricks  performed  by  jugglers  and  Egyptians  in  the  mid- 
dle of  market-places.^  It  was  the  opinion  of  Celsus  that 
Jesus  in  warning  His  disciples  that  "there  shall  arise  false 
Christs  and  false  prophets,  and  shall  show  great  signs  and 
wonders,"  had  tacitly  convicted  Himself  of  the  same  magical 
practices.^  Celsus,  for  his  part,  warned  the  Christians  that 
they  "must  shun  all  deceivers  and  jugglers  who  will  intro- 
duce you  to  phantoms" ;  ^  he  accused  them  of  employing  in- 
cantations and  the  names  of  certain  demons ;  ^  he  asserted 
that  he  had  seen  in  the  hands  of  Christian  presbyters  "bar- 
barous books  containing  the  names  and  marvelous  opera- 
tions of  demons,"  and  that  these  presbyters  "professed  to 
do  no  good,  but  all  that  was  calculated  tO'  injure  human 
beings."  '^ 

Celsus  regarded  Moses  equally  with  Jesus  as  a  wizard,^    Hebrew 
and  he  evidently,  like  Juvenal  and  other  classical  writers,   depicted^ 
considered  the  Jews  and  Syrians  as  a  race  of  charlatans,   ^^  Celsus 
especially  given  to  superstition,  sorcery,  incantations,  am- 
biguous oracles  and  conjuration  of  spirits.     "They  worship 
angels,"  he  declared,  "and  are  addicted  to  sorcery,  in  which 
Moses  was  their   instructor."  ^     He  stated  that  the  Jews 
traced  back  their  origin  to  "the  first  generation  of  lying 
wizards,"   by  which  phrase  Origen  thinks  he  referred  to 
Abraham,   Isaac,  and  Jacob,  whose  names  Origen  admits 
are  much  employed  in  the  magic  arts.-^^     Celsus    further 
characterized  the  Jews  as  "blinded  by  some  crooked  sorcery, 
or   dreaming   dreams   through   the   influence    of    shadowy 
specters,"  ^^  and  as  "induced  to  bow  down  to  the  angels  in 
heaven    by   the    incantations    employed    by    jugglery    and 


*  I,  71 ;  also  II,  32. 

'  VI,  40. 

M,  38;  also  VIII,  9;  11,48. 

'V.  SI. 

'1,68;  III,  52. 

"1,26. 

*II,49. 

"IV,  33. 

'VII,  36. 

"V,  6. 

-1.6. 

438 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Various 
recrimina- 
tions of 
magic. 


Origen's 
distinction 
between 
miracles 
and  magic. 


sorcery,  in  consequence  of  which  certain  phantoms  ap- 
pear in  obedience  to  the  spells  employed  by  the  magicians."  * 
Celsus,  also,  in  describing  the  many  self-styled  prophets, 
Redeemers,  and  Sons  of  God  in  the  Phoenicia  and  Pales- 
tine of  his  own  time,  states  that  they  make  use  of  "strange, 
fanatical,  and  quite  unintelligible  words,  of  which  no  rational 
person  can  find  any  meaning,"  ^  and  that  those  prophets 
whom  he  himself  had  heard  had  afterwards  confessed  to 
him  that  these  words  "really  meant  nothing."  ^  Yet  even 
the  Christians — Celsus  complains — who  condemn  all  other 
oracles,  regard  as  marvelous  and  accept  unquestioningly 
"those  sayings  which  were  uttered  or  were  not  uttered  in 
Judea  after  the  manner  of  that  country,  as  indeed  they  are 
still  delivered  among  the  peoples  of  Phoenicia  and  Pales- 
tine." ^ 

To  these  accusations  of  Celsus  Origen  himself  adds  that 
the  Jews  affirm  that  Jesus  passed  Himself  off  as  Christ  by 
means  of  sorcery,^  while  the  Egyptians  charge  Moses  and 
the  Hebrews  with  the  practice  of  sorcery  during  their  stay 
in  Egypt.®  Origen,  on  the  other  hand,  speaks  of  "the 
magical  arts  and  rites  of  the  Egyptians"  and  holds  that  it 
was  by  divine  aid  and  not  by  superior  magic  that  Moses 
prevailed  over  Pharaoh's  magicians.'^  Celsus  for  his  part 
had  accused  Jesus  during  His  residence  in  Egypt  of  "hav- 
ing there  acquired  some  miraculous  powers,  on  which  the 
Egyptians  greatly  pride  themselves."  ^ 

Origen  repudiates  the  charges  of  magic  made  against 
Christ  and  His  followers  as  slanders.  He  asserts  that  Chris- 
tianity on  the  contrary  strictly  forbids  the  practice  of  magic 
arts,^  and  that  these  lost  much  of  their  force  at  the  birth 
of  Christ. ^*^  He  contends  that  no  magician  would  teach  such 
noble  doctrines  as  those  of  Christianity.^^  Origen  goes  so 
far  as  to  deny   that  even   the   "false   Christs   and   false 

*V,  9.  'Ill,  46;  IV,  51. 

*VII,  9.  '1,28. 


'VII,  II. 
*VII,  3. 
"  III,  I. 
•III.  s. 


•  I,  38. 
"  I,  60. 
"I.  38. 


XIX  O  RIG  EN  AND  C  ELS  US  439 

prophets,"  who  "shall  show  great  signs  and  wonders,"  will 
be  sorcerers,  and  he  states  that  no  sorcerer  has  ever  claimed 
to  be  Christ  ^ — an  amazing  assertion  in  view  of  his  own 
allusions  to  Simon  Magus.  Works  of  magic  and  miracles, 
Origen  affirms,  are  no  more  alike  than  are  a  wolf  and  a 
dog  or  a  wood-pigeon  and  a  dove.  They  are,  however,  so 
closely  related  that  if  one  admits  the  reality  of  magic  he 
must  also  believe  in  divine  miracles,  just  as  the  existence 
of  sophistry  proves  that  there  is  such  a  thing  as  sound  argu- 
ment and  an  art  of  dialectic.^  Moreover,  in  one  passage 
Origen  admits  that  "there  would  indeed  be  a  resemblance" 
between  miracles  and  magic,  "if  Jesus,  Hke  the  dealers  in 
magic  arts,  had  performed  His  works  only  for  show;  but 
now  there  is  not  a  single  juggler  who,  by  means  of  his  pro- 
ceedings, invites  his  spectators  to  reform  their  manners,  or 
trains  those  to  the  fear  of  God  who  are  amazed  at  what 
they  see,  nor  who  tries  to  persuade  them  so  to  live  as  men 
who  are  to  be  justified  by  God."  ^  On  the  contrary,  Origen 
asserts  that  the  magicians'  "own  lives  are  full  of  the  grossest 
and  most  notorious  sins." 

Since  it  is  one  of  Origen's  chief   concerns  to  uphold   Origen 
Hebrew  prophecy  as  a  proof  of  Christ's  divinity,  although  as  wellTs^ 
Celsus  subjects  the  argument   from  prophecy  to  ridicule;   ^^hnstians 

to  defend  the  Old  Testament  against  Celsus'  attacks  as  an   charge  of 
.        .  magic, 

mspired  record  of  greater  antiquity  than  Greek  philosophy, 

history,  and  literature,  which  he  asserts  have  stolen  truths 
from  it;  and  to  maintain  that  "there  is  no  discrepancy  be- 
tween the  God  of  the  Gospel  and  the  God  of  the  Law" :  ^ — 
since  this  is  so,  it  is  incumbent  upon  him  to  rebut  also  the 
accusations  of  magic  laid  by  Celsus  at  the  door  of  the 
Jews.  Origen  therefore  asserts  that  the  Jews  "despised 
all  kinds  of  divination  as  that  which  bewitches  men  to  no 
purpose,"  and  cites  the  prohibition  of  Leviticus  (xix,  31) 
against  wizards  and  familiar  spirits.^ 

'11,49.  "Vll,  25. 

•11,51.  '•V,42. 

•1,68. 


440  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

Celsus'  The  Reply  to  Cclsus  is  of  especial  interest  to  us  because 

descHpdon  it  presents  as  it  were  in  parallel  columns  for  our  inspection 
of  magic,  ^he  classical  and  the  Christian  conceptions  of  and  attitudes 
towards  magic.  Before  proceeding,  therefore,  to  inquire 
how  far  justified  Origen  seems  to  be  in  thus  acquitting,  or 
Celsus,  on  the  other  hand,  in  condemning  Christians  and 
Jews  on  the  charge  of  magic,  it  is  essential  to  note  what 
magic  means  for  either  author.  Both  evidently  regard  it 
as  a  term  of  reproach  and  as  usually  evil  in  character.^ 
Celsus  lists  as  feats  of  magic  the  expelling  of  demons  and 
diseases  from  men,  or  the  sudden  production  of  tables, 
dishes,  and  food  as  for  an  expensive  banquet,  or  of  animals 
who  move  about  as  if  alive.  Celsus,  however,  seems  to 
speak  with  a  sneer  of  "their  most  venerated  arts"  and  de- 
scribes the  banquet  dishes  as  "dainties  having  no  real  exist- 
ence" and  the  animals  as  "not  really  living  but  having 
only  the  appearance  of  life."  Therefore  the  ensuing  com- 
ment of  Origen  seems  unusually  stupid  or  unfair,  when 
he  tries  to  convict  Celsus  of  inconsistency  on  the  ground 
that  "by  these  expressions  he  allows  as  it  were  the  existence 
of  magic,"  whereas  Origen  hints  that  it  was  he  "who  wrote 
several  books  against  it."  "These  expressions"  are,  on  the 
contrary,  precisely  those  which  a  man  who  had  attacked 
magic  as  deceptive  would  use.  Celsus  further  stated  that 
an  Egyptian  named  Dionysius  had  told  him  that  magic  arts 
had  power  "only  over  the  uneducated  and  men  of  corrupt 
morals,"  but  had  no  effect  upon  philosophers,  "because  they 
were  careful  to  observe  a  healthy  manner  of  life."  ^  Celsus 
himself  observed  that  "those  who  in  market-places  perform 
most  disreputable  tricks  and  collect  crowds  around  them 
.  .  .  would  never  approach  an  assembly  of  wise  men."  ^ 
It  was  at  the  request  of  a  Celsus,  moreover,  that  the  second 
century  satirist  Lucian  wrote  his  Alexander  or  Pseudo- 
mantis  ^  in  which  some  of  the  tricks  of  a  magician-impostor 
and  oracle-monger  are  exposed,  and  in  which  allusion  is 

M,  68.  '111,52. 

* VI,  41.  'See  cap.  21. 


XIX  0  RIG  EN  AND  C  ELS  US  44i 

made  to  the  "excellent  treatises  against  the  magicians"  writ- 
ten by  Celsus  himself.  It  seems  reasonably  certain  that 
the  Celsus  of  Lucian  and  the  Celsus  of  Origen  are  identical, 
as  there  are  no  chronological  difiEiculties  and  the  same  point 
of  view  is  ascribed  in  either  case  to  Celsus,  whom  both 
Lucian  and  Origen  regard  as  an  Epicurean  or  at  least  in 
sympathy  with  the  Epicureans.  Galen,  in  a  treatise  in  which 
he  lists  his  own  writings,  mentions  an  "Epistle  to  Celsus  the 
Epicurean."  ^     This,  too,  might  be  the  same  man. 

Another  passage  in  which  Celsus,  according  to  Origen  at   Celsus 
least,  "mixed  up  together  matters  which  belong  to  magic   connection 
and  sorcery"  runs  as  follows :    "What  need  to  number  up   between 
all  those  who  have  taught  methods  of  purification,  or  expia-   occult  vir- 
tory  hymns,  or  spells  for  averting  evil,  or  images,  or  re-   Jj'^^^^'g 
semblances  of  demons,  or  the  various  sorts  of  antidotes 
against  poison   in  clothing,   or  in  numbers,   or   stones,   or 
plants,  or  roots,  or  generally  in  all  kinds  of  things?"  ^     In 
another  passage  Celsus  again  closely  connected  sorcery  with 
the  knowledge  of  occult  virtues  in  nature,  arguing  that  men 
need  not  pride  themselves  upon  their  power  of  sorcery  when 
serpents  and  eagles  know  of  antidotes  to  poisons  and  amulets 
and  the  virtues  of  certain  stones  which  help  to  preserve  their 
young."  ^     Origen  objects  that  it  is  not  customary  to  use 
the  word  sorcery   (jorjTeia)    for  such  things,  and  suggests 
that  Celsus  is  such  an  "Epicurean,"  i.  e.,  so  sceptical,  that 
he  wishes  to  discredit  all  those  other  beliefs  and  practices 
"as  resting  only  on  the  professions  of  sorcerers."     But  we 
have  already  had  proof  enough  in  other  chapters  that  Celsus 
was  not  unjustified  in  connecting  the  occult  virtue  of  nat- 
ural objects  with  magic,  if  not  with  sorcery. 

Celsus,   as   we   shall   see,   believed   in  the  existence   of   Celsus  on 
demons  whom,  however,  he  did  not  regard  as  necessarily   ^^j' *^^^"^ 
evil  spirits,  and  whom  he  probably  regarded  as  above  any   demons. 
connection  with  magic.     Origen  once  says  that  if  Celsus 

^Kiihn,  XIX,  48  (de  libris  pro-  'VI,  39. 

priis) .  Merpod'-'pov  kirL(TTo\ri  -rrpos  Kk\-  'IV,  86. 

ffoi>  'ETriKo'jpeiov. 


442  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

"had  been  acquainted  with  the  nature  of  demons"  and  their 
operations  in  the  magic  arts,  he  would  not  have  blamed 
Christians  for  not  worshiping  them.^  The  natural  infer- 
ence from  this  statement  is  that  Celsus  did  not  associate 
demons  with  magic.  Origen,  however,  depicts  him  as 
**speaking  of  those  who  employ  the  arts  of  magic  and 
sorcery  and  who  invoke  the  barbarous  names  of  demons,"  ^ 
and  we  liave  already  heard  him  censure  certain  Christian 
presbyters  for  their  ''barbarous  books  containing  the  names 
and  marvelous  doings  of  demons."  ^  It  therefore  becomes 
evident  that  magicians  attempt  to  avail  themselves  of  the 
aid  of  demons,  whether  Celsus  believes  that  they  succeed  in 
their  attempt  or  not. 
Origen  Origen  at  any  rate  believes  that  magicians  are  aided 

magic  to  by  evil  spirits,  and  for  him  demons  became  the  paramount 
demons.  factor  in  magic,  just  as  it  is  they  who  are  v/orshiped  in 
pagan  temples  as  gods  and  who  inspire  the  pagan  oracles.* 
Indeed,  just  as  Celsus  has  kept  calling  the  Christians  sor- 
cerers, so  Origen  is  inclined  to  label  all  heathen  religions, 
rites,  and  ceremonies  as  magic.  He  quotes  the  Psalmist  as 
saying  that  "all  the  gods  of  the  heathen  are  demons."  ^  He 
states  that  the  dedication  of  pagan  temples,  statues,  and  the 
like  are  accompanied  by  "curious  magical  incantations  .  .  . 
performed  by  those  who  zealously  serve  the  demons  with 
magic  arts."  ^  Divination  in  general,  he  believes,  "proceeds 
rather  from  wicked  demons  than  from  anything  of  a  better 
nature."  '^  He  does  not  think  of  magic  as  a  deception,  he 
does  not  endeavor  to  expose  its  frauds,  he  accepts  its  mar- 
vels as  facts,  but  declares  that  "magic  and  sorcery  are  pro- 
duced by  wicked  spirits,  held  spellbound  by  elaborate 
incantations  and  yielding  themselves  to  sorcerers."  ^  Origen 
seems  in  doubt  whether  the  demons  are  coerced  by  the  spells 
and  charms  of  magic  or  yield  themselves  willingly.® 

*  VII,  67.  'V,  42. 

»VI,  39.  'II.  51.     See  also  V,  38;  VI,  45; 

'VI,  40.  VII,  69;  VIII,  59;  I,  60. 

*VII,  3  and  35.  'See     VII,     67,     "demons  .  .  . 

"  Ps.  xcvi,  5.  and      their      several      operations, 

•VII,  69.  whether   led   on   to   them   by   the 


XIX  ORIGEN  AND  CELSUS  443 

As  we  shall  see,  Origen  is  at  least  ready  to  attribute  Magic 
great  power  to  incantations,  and  he  does  not  deny  that  elaborate 
magic  is  an  elaborate  art.  With  such  various  arts  of  magic  ^'■*- 
he  contrasts  the  simplicity  of  Christian  prayers  and  adjura- 
tions "which  the  plainest  person  can  use,"  or  the  Christian 
casting  out  of  demons  which  is  performed  for  the  most 
part  by  "unlettered  persons."  ^  Origen  also  suggests  that 
the  natural  properties  of  plants  and  animals  are  a  factor  in 
magic,  when  he  cites  Numenius  the  Pythagorean's  descrip- 
tion of  the  Egyptian  deity  Serapis.  "He  partakes  of  the 
essence  of  all  the  animals  and  plants  that  are  under  the 
control  of  nature,  that  he  may  appear  to  have  been  fashioned 
into  a  god,  not  only  by  the  image-makers  with  the  aid  of 
profane  mysteries  and  juggling  tricks  employed  to  invoke 
demons,  but  also  by  magicians  and  sorcerers  ( nayoiv  Kal 
(papixaKoiv)  and  those  demons  who  are  bewitched  b}'  their 
incantations."  ^  Another  passage  pointing  in  the  same  di- 
rection is  Origen's  description  of  "the  man  who  is  curiously 
inquisitive  about  the  names  of  demons,  their  powers  and 
agency,  the  incantations,  the  herbs  proper  to  them,  and  the 
stones  with  the  inscriptions  graven  on  them,  corresponding 
symbolically  or  otherwise  to  their  traditional  shapes."  ^ 
Thus  although  Origen  lays  the  emphasis  upon  demons,  we 
see  that  he  admits  most  of  the  other  customary  elements  in 
magic. 

Origen  does  not,  like  Philo  Judaeus,  Apuleius  and  some  The  Magi 
Christian  writers,  distinguish  two  uses  of  the  word  magic,   °ure  were 
one  good  and  one  evil.     He  does  not  differentiate  between  not  differ- 
vulgar  magic  and  malignant  sorcery  on  the  one  hand  and  other 
the  lore  of  learned  Magi  of  the  east  on  the  other  hand.    He  magicians. 

conjurations    of    those    who    are  choose  certain   forms   and  places, 

skilled  in  the  art,  or  urged  on  by  whether  because  they  are  detained 

their  own  inclinations.  .  .  ."  there  by  virtue  of  certain  charms, 

Also  VII,  5,  "those  spirits  that  or   because    for   some   other    pos- 

are  attached  for  entire  ages,  as  1  sible    reason    they    have    selected 

may   say,   to   particular    dwellings  those  haunts.  .  .  ." 

and  places,  whether  by  a  sort  of  ^VII,  4.     0:$  tiriirav  yip   idiuraird 

magical    force    or    by    their    own  toiovtov  TrparTovtri,. 

natural  inclinations."  ''V,  38. 

Also  VII,  64,  ".  .  .  the  demons  "  VIII.  61. 


444  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

simply  says  that  the  art  of  magic  gets  its  name  from  the 
Magi  and  that  from  them  its  evil  influence  has  been  trans- 
mitted to  other  nations.^  Celsus  had  ranked  the  Magi 
among  divinely  inspired  nations  but  Origen  objects  to  this. 
Yet  he  recognizes  that  the  wise  men  of  the  east  who  fol- 
lowed the  star  of  Bethlehem  and  came  to  worship  the  infant 
Christ  were  Magi.^  But  he  seems  to  regard  them  as  ordi- 
nary magicians,  who  were  accustomed  to  invoke  evil 
spirits.^  He  thinks  that  the  coming  of  Christ  dispelled  the 
demons  and  hindered  the  Magi's  spells  and  charms  from 
working  as  usual.  Trying  to  find  the  reason  for  this,  they 
would  note  the  new  star  in  the  sky.  Origen  will  not  adrnit 
that  they  could  do  all  this  by  means  of  astrology,  nor  even 
that  they  were  astrologers  at  all;  he  accuses  Celsus  of 
blundering  in  calling  them  Chaldeans  or  astrologers.* 
Rather  he  thinks  that  they  could  find  an  explanation  of 
the  star  in  the  prophecies  of  Balaam  ^  which  they  possessed 
and  which  predicted,  as  Moses  too  records,^  "There  shall 
arise  a  star  out  of  Jacob,  and  a  man  (or,  as  in  the  King 
James'  version,  a  scepter)  shall  rise  up  out  of  Israel."  ^ 
In  another  treatise  than  the  Reply  to  Celsus  Origen  further 
explains  that  the  Magi  were  descended  from  Balaam  and 
so  owned  his  written  prophecies.^  Balaam  was  perhaps 
alluding  to  these  very  Magi  descended  from  him  who  came 
to  adore  Jesus  when  he  prophesied  that  his  seed  should 

*VI,  80.  wiss  den  sieben  Planetfiirsten  ge- 

^I,  58.  widmet." 

'I,  60.  "  Numbers,  XXIV,  17. 

*  I,  58.  The  Magi  had  been  ''  Similarly  an  English  version 
confused  with  the  Chaldeans  sev-  (in  an  Oxford  MS  of  the  early 
eral  centuries  before  by  Ctesias  15th  century,  Laud  Misc.,  658)  of 
in  his  Persica.  cap.  15;  see  D.  F.  The  History  of  the  Three  Kings 
Miinter,  Der  Stern  der  Weisen:  of  Cologne,  or  medieval  account 
Untersuchungen  i'tber  das  Ge-  of  the  translation  of  the  relics  of 
hurts jahr  Christi,  Kopenhagen  the  Magi,  in  forty-one  chapters 
(1827),  p.  14.  with    a    preface,    opens    its    first 

*  Balaam  himself  was  something  chapter  with  the  words,  "The 
of  an  astrolo.crer  according  to  mater  of  these  three  worshipful 
Miinter,  Der  Stern  der  Weisen,  and  blissid  kingis  token  the  be- 
1827,  p.  31.  "Die  sieben  Altare  gynnyng  of  the  prophecye  of 
die  der  moabitische  Seher  Bileam  Balaam." 

an  verschiedenen  Orten  errichtete  ^  In  Numeros  Homilia  XIII,  in 

(IV  B.  Mose,  XXIII)   waren  ge-      Migne,  PG,  XII,  675. 


XIX  O  RIG  EN  AND  C  ELS  US  445 

be  as  the  seed  of  the  just.^  Origen  seems  to  have  been  the 
first  of  the  church  fathers  to  state  the  number  of  these 
Magi  as  three,  which  he  does  in  one  of  his  homihes  on  the 
Book  of  Genesis.- 

At  this  point  indeed,  we  may  well  turn  for  a  little  while  g-uP"!* 
from  the  Reply  to  Celsus  to  those  Biblical  commentaries  of  commen- 
Origen  where  he  discusses  such  Old  Testament  passages 
connected  with  magic  as  the  stories  of  Balaam  and  of  the 
witch  of  Endor  or  ventriloquist.  The  commentary  of  Origen 
upon  the  Book  of  Numbers  is  extant  only  in  the  Latin  trans- 
lation by  Rufinus,  who  literally  snatched  it  for  posterity  as 
a  brand  from  the  burning,  for  he  did  not  refrain  from  this 
learned  and  literary  labor,  although  as  he  plied  his  pen  in 
]Messina  in  410  A.  D.  he  could  see  the  invading  barbarians 
ravaging  the  fields  and  burning  Reggio  just  across  the  nar- 
row strait  which  separates  Sicily  from  Italy.^ 

In  commencing  to  speak  of  Balaam  and  his  ass  *  Origen  ^^j^^J" 
implies  that  much  has  already  been  written  on  this  thorny  power  of 
theme  and  that  he  approaches  it  with  considerable  diffidence. 
He  prays  God  again  and  again  for  grace  to  be  able  to 
explain  it,  not  by  means  of  fabulous  Jewish  narrations — ■ 
by  which  expression  he  perhaps  alludes  to  commentaries 
of  the  rabbis  such  as  have  reached  us  in  the  Talmud — 
but  in  a  sense  that  shall  be  reasonable  and  worthy  of  the 
divine  law.  To  begin  with  he  admits  the  power  of  words, 
and  not  merely  that  of  holy  words  or  words  of  God,  but  of 
certain  words  used  by  men.  That  such  words  are  in  some 
respects  more  powerful  than  bodies  is  shown  by  the  fact 
that  Balaam's  cursing  could  accomplish  what  armies  and 
weapons  could  not  effect.  This  calls  to  mind  one  of  the 
Mohammedan  tales  concerning  Balaam  to  the  effect  that 
by  reading  the  books  of  Abraham  he  learned  "the  name 

^  In  Numeros  Hoinilia  XV,  col.  *  Origenis  in  Numeros  Homilia 

689.  XIII,    Migne,    PG,    XII,    670-677. 

*  In    Genesim    Homilia   XIV,   3,  In    at    least    one    medieval    manu- 

in  PG,  XII,  238.  script    we    find    the    homily    upon 

^Origenis    in    Numeros    Hoiiii-  Balaam  preserved  separately,  BN 

liae,  Prologus  RiiUni  Interpret  is  ad  13350,    12th    century,    fol.    92V,   et 

Ursacium.   Migne,  PG,  XII,  583-86.  omeliae  de  Balaham  et  Balach. 


words. 


446 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Limita- 
tions to 
the  power 
of  Pha- 
raoh's ma- 
gicians. 


Was 

Balaam  a 
prophet  of 
God  or  a 
magician  ? 


Yahweh  by  virtue  of  which  he  predicted  the  future,  and 
got  from  God  whatever  he  wished."  ^ 

The  magicians  of  Egypt,  too,  who  withstood  Moses  and 
Aaron  before  Pharaoh,  were  able  to  turn  rods  into  snakes 
and  water  into  blood,  feats  which  no  man  could  accomplish 
by  mere  bodily  strength.  Indeed,  because  the  king  of  Egypt 
knew  that  his  magicians  could  do  such  things  by  a  human 
art  of  words,  he  thought,  at  first  at  least,  that  Moses  too 
was  doing  the  same  things  not  by  the  help  of  God  but  by 
the  magic  art.  There  was,  however,  a  very  serious  limita- 
tion to  the  magicians'  power.  By  the  aid  of  demons  they 
could  turn  good  into  evil  but  they  could  not  repair  the  dam- 
age which  they  had  done  or  restore  the  evil  to  good.  The 
rod  of  Moses,  on  the  other  hand,  not  only  devoured  theirs 
but  turned  back  from  a  snake  into  its  original  form,^  and  it 
was  necessary  for  Moses  to  pray  to  God  in  order  to  stay  the 
other  plagues. 

Origen  classifies  Balaam  as  a  magician,  not  as  a  prophet. 
This  seems'to  have  been  the  prevalent  patristic  and  medieval 
view,  although  the  Biblical  account  in  Numbers  represents 
Balaam  as  in  close  and  constant  communication  with  God 
and  the  Second  Epistle  of  Peter  ^  calls  him  a  prophet  al- 
though it  condemns  his  temporary  madness  in  seeking  "the 
wages  of  unrighteousness."  Josephus  too  calls  him  the 
best  prophet  of  his  time  but  one  who  yielded  to  temptation.* 
A  fifteenth  century  treatise  on  the  translation  of  the  relics  of 
the  three  kings  to  Cologne  tells  us  that  "concerning  this 
Balaam  there  is  an  altercation  in  the  east  between  the 
Christians  and  the  Jews" ;  the  Jews  holding  that  he  was 
no  prophet  but  a  diviner  who  predicted  by  magic  and 
diabolical  arts,  the  Christians  asserting  that  he  was  the 
first  prophet  of  the  Gentiles.^     The  problem  continued  to 


*W.  H.  Bennett,  Balaam,  in 
EB,  nth  edition. 

*  One  cannot  help  wondering 
whether  Pharaoh's  magicians  lost 
their  rods  for  good  as  a  result 
of  this  manoeuvre,  but  it  is  a 
point   upon   which   the   Scriptural 


narrative  fails  to  enlighten  us. 

"11,  1S-16. 

*Antiq.,  IV,  6. 

"  Johannis  Hildeshemensis,  Liber 
de  trium  regum  translatione,  1478, 
cap.  2. 


XIX 


OKI  GEN  AND  C ELS  US 


447 


exercise  the  ingenuity  of  Lutherans  and  theologians  of  the 
Reformed  Churches,  and  in  1842  was  the  main  theme  of  a 
treatise  of  290  pages  in  which  Hebrew  words  and  quota- 
tions from  Calvin  abound,^ 

Origen  remarks  that  magicians  differ  in  the  amount  of 
power  they  possess.  Balaam  was  a  very  famous  and  ex- 
pert -one,  known  throughout  the  whole  orient.  He  had 
given  many  experimental  proofs  {experimenta)  of  his  skill 
and  Balak  had  frequently  employed  him.  The  translator 
Rufinus's  repeated  use  of  the  words  experimenta  and  ex~ 
pertus  here  is  an  interesting  indication  of  the  close  connec- 
tion between  magic  and  experiment.^ 

Great,  however,  as  was  Balaam's  fame  and  power,  he 
could  only  curse  and  not  bless,  an  indication  that  he  oper- 
ated by  the  agency  of  demons  who  also  only  work  evil 
and  not  good.  It  is  true  that  King  Balak  said  to  him: 
*'I  know  that  whom  you  bless  will  be  blessed,"  but  Origen 
regards  this  as  false  flattery.  Magicians  employ  the  serv- 
ices of  evil  spirits,  but  cannot  invoke  such  angels  as  Michael, 
Raphael,  and  Gabriel,  much  less  God  or  Christ.  Christians 
alone  have  the  power  to  do  this,  and  they  must  cease  entirely 
from  the  invocation  of  demons  or  the  Holy  Spirit  will  flee 
from  them. 

It  is  true  also  that  God  in  the  end  did  speak  through 
the  mouth  of  Balaam  and  that  he  blessed  instead  of  cursed 
Israel.  Origen  will  not  admit,  however,  that  Balaam  was 
worthy  of  this,  or  that  a  man  can  be  both  a  magician  and 
a  prophet;  if  God  spake  through  Balaam,  it  was  only  to 
prevent  the  demons  from  coming  and  helping  Balaam  to 
curse  Israel.     Origen  also  attempts  to  solve  the  difficulties 


Balaam's 
magic  ex- 
periments. 


Limitation 
to  his 
magic 
power. 


Divine 

prophecy 

distinct 

from 

magic  and 

divination. 


*  E.  W.  Hengstenberg,  Die  Ge- 
schichte  Bileains  und  seine  JVeis- 
sagungen,  Berlin,  1842.  Hengsten- 
berg tried  to  take  middle  ground 
between  Philo  Judaeus,  Ambrose, 
Augustine,  Gregory  of  Nyssa, 
Theodoret,  and  others  who  re- 
garded Balaam  as  a  godless  false 
prophet  and  magician,  and  the 
contrary    opinion     of     TertuUian, 


Jerome,  and  some  moderns  who 
hold  that  Balaam  was  originally 
a  devout  man  and  true  prophet 
who  fell  through  his  covetousness. 
'  "Et  ideo  quasi  expertus  in  tali- 
bus  in  opinione  erat  omnibus  qui 
erant  in  Oriente  .  .  .  Certus  ergo 
Balach  de  hoc  et  frequenter  ex- 
pertus." 


448 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


The  ven- 
triloquist 
really 
invoked 
Samuel 
for  Saul. 


Christians 
less  af- 
fected 
by  magic 
than  phi- 
losophers 
are. 


and  inconsistencies  involved  in  the  repeated  appearances  and 
conflicting  commands  of  God  and  the  angel  to  Balaam. 
Finally  we  may  note  that  Origen  sees  the  similarity  be- 
tween the  use  of  cauldron-shaped  tripods  in  human  arts 
of  divination  and  the  donning  of  the  ephod  by  the  prophets 
described  in  the  Old  Testament.^  But  he  affirms  that  divine 
prophecy  and  divination  are  two  different  things  and  cites 
the  Biblical  prohibition  of  the  latter. 

In  his  commentary  upon  the  First  Book  of  Samuel,^ 
Origen  takes  the  ground  that  when  Saul  consulted  the  witch 
or  ventriloquist  (kyyaaTpinvdos) ,  Samuel's  ghost  really  appeared 
and  spoke  to  Saul,  for  the  Scriptural  account  plainly  says 
that  the  woman  saw  Samuel  ^  and  that  Samuel  spoke  to 
Saul.  Consequently  Origen  cannot  agree  with  those  who 
have  held  that  the  woman  deceived  Saul  or  that  both  she 
and  he  were  deluded  by  a  demon  who  assumed  the  guise  of 
Samuel.  No  demon,  he  thinks,  could  have  prophesied  that 
the  kingdom  would  pass  to  David.  It  has  been  objected 
that  the  enchantress  could  not  raise  the  spirit  of  Samuel 
from  the  infernal  regions  because  he  was  a  good  man,  but 
Origen  holds  that  even  Christ  descended  to  hell  and  that 
all  before  Him  had  their  abode  there  until  He  came  to 
release  them.  From  this  position  not  even  the  parable  of 
Dives  and  of  Lazarus  in  Abraham's  bosom  with  the  great 
gulf  fixed  between  them  can  shake  Origen. 

Origen  disputes  the  statement  of  Celsus  that  philo- 
sophers are  not  affected  by  the  magic  arts  by  pointing  out 
that  in  Moiragenes's  Life  of  Apolloniiis  of  Tyana,  who  was 
himself  both  a  philosopher  and  magician,  it  is  affirmed  that 
other  philosophers  were  won  over  by  his  magic  power  "and 
resorted  to  him  as  a  sorcerer."  *  On  the  other  hand  Origen 
makes  the  counter-assertion  that  the  followers  of  Christ 
"who  live  according  to  His  gospel,  using  night  and  day  con- 

^In  Homily  XIV. 

"Migne,  PG,  XII,  1011-28. 

'J.  G.  Frazer  (1918),  II,  522, 
note,  however,  says  of  I.  Samuel, 
XXVIII,  12:  "It  seems  that  we 
must  read,  'And  when  the  woman 


saw    Saul,'    with    six   manuscripts 
of  the  Septuagint  and  some  mod- 
ern critics,  instead  of,  'And  when 
the  woman  saw  Samuel.' " 
*VI,  41- 


XIX 


0  RIG  EN  AND  CELSUS 


449 


tions. 


tinuously  and  becomingly  the  prescribed  prayers,  are  not 

carried  away  either  by  magic  or  demons." 

If  these  "prescribed  prayers"  were  set  forms  of  words,   Their 

super- 
they  would  seem  not  far  removed  in  character  from  the  m-   stitious 

cantations  of  the  magicians  which  they  were  supposed  to   ^^^^j^°^^ 
counteract.    An  even  clearer  example  of  preventive  magic  is   magic. 
seen  in  Origen's  explanation  that  the  practice  of  circum- 
cision was  a  safeguard  against  some  angel  {s!ic)  hostile  to 
the  Jewish  race.^ 

If  demons  are  for  Origen  of  primary  importance  in  Incanta- 
magic,  incantations  run  a  close  second,  since  it  is  chiefly 
through  them  that  men  are  able  to  utilize  the  power  of  the 
demons.  Some  of  the  barbarians,  Origen  tells  us,  "are 
admired  for  their  marvelous  powers  of  incantation."  ^ 
And  when  he  mentions  the  miraculous  releases  of  Peter  and 
Paul  and  Silas  from  prison,  he  adds  that  if  Celsus  had  read 
of  these  events  he  "would  probably  say  in  reply  that  there 
are  certain  sorcerers  who  are  able  by  incantations  to  unloose 
chains  and  to  open  doors."  ^  But  Celsus  did  not  say  this; 
we  must  therefore  attribute  the  thought  rather  to  Origen 
himself.  Speaking  elsewhere  in  his  own  person  Origen  more 
than  once  informs  us  that  "almost  all  those  who  occupy 
themselves  with  incantations  and  magical  rites"  and  "many 
who  conjure  evil  spirits"  employ  in  their  spells  and  incan- 
tations such  expressions  as  "God  of  Abraham."  *  Origen 
grants  that  these  phrases  are  used  by  the  Jews  themselves 
in  their  prayers  to  God  and  exorcisms,  and  that  the  names 
of  Abraham,  Isaac,  and  Jacob  possess  great  efficacy  "when 
united  with  the  word  of  God."  ^  Yet  he  will  not  acknowl- 
edge that  the  Jews  practice  magic.  He  also  denies  the  charge 
of  Celsus  that  Christians  use  incantations  and  the  names  of 


'  V,  48. 

'  I,  30. 

"11,  34. 

*IV,  33,  and  I,  22. 

"IV,  33.  On  the  use  of  mystic 
names  of  God  among  the  Jews  of 
this  period  and  "the  new  and 
greatly  developed  angelology  that 
flourished   at  that   time   in    Egypt 


and  Palestine"  see  the  Introduc- 
tion to  M.  Caster's  edition  of  The 
Szvord  of  Moses,  1896, — a  book 
of  magic  found  in  a  I3-I4th  cen- 
tury Hebrew  MS,  but  which  is 
mentioned  in  the  nth  century  and 
which  he  would  trace  back  to 
ancient  times. 


450  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

certain  demons,  although  he  admits  that  Christians  ward  off 
magic  by  regular  use  of  prescribed  prayers  and  frequently 
expel  demons  by  repetition  of  "the  simple  name  of  Jesus, 
and  certain  other  words  in  which  they  repose  faith,  accord- 
ing to  the  holy  Scriptures,"  or  "the  name  of  Jesus  accom- 
panied by  the  announcement  of  the  narratives  which  relate 
to  Him"  (presumably  a  repetition  of  the  names  of  the  four 
Evangelists).^  It  is  even  possible  for  persons  who  are  not 
true  Christians  to  make  use  of  the  name  of  Jesus  to  work 
wonders  just  as  magicians  use  the  Hebrew  names.^ 
The  power  Origen,  however,  does  not  try  to  justify  these  Hebrew 
o  wor  s,  ^^^  Christian  formulae,  adjurations,  and  exorcisms  on  the 
ground  that  they  are  simply  prayers  to  God,  who  Himself 
then  performs  the  cure  or  miracle  without  compulsion. 
Origen  believes  that  there  is  power  in  the  words  themselves, 
as  we  have  already  heard  him  state  in  speaking  of  Balaam. 
This  is  seen  from  the  fact  that  when  translated  into  an- 
other language  they  lose  their  operative  force,  as  those  who 
are  skilled  in  the  use  of  incantations  have  noted. ^  Thus  not 
what  is  signified  by  the  words,  but  the  qualities  and  peculi- 
arities of  the  words  themselves,  are  potent  for  this  or  that 
effect.  It  seems  strange  that  Origen  should  thus  cite  en- 
chanters, when  in  the  sentence  just  preceding  he  had  spoken 
of  "our  Jesus,  whose  name  has  been  manifestly  seen  to  have 
driven  out  demons  from  souls  and  bodies.  .  .  ."  Was  the 
divine  name  alone  and  not  God  the  cause  of  the  miracle  ?  It 
may  be  added,  however,  that  Origen  denied  that  languages 
were  of  human  origin.^  But  he  has  already  gone  far  along 
this  line  and  in  the  previous  chapter  has  stated  that  "the 
nature  of  powerful  names"  is  a  "deep  and  mysterious  sub- 
ject." ^  Some  such  names,  he  goes  on  to  say,  "are  used  by 
the  learned  amongst  the  Egyptians,  or  by  the  Magi  among 
the  Persians,  and  by  the  Indian  philosophers  called  Brah- 
mans." 

*  I,  6.    It  also,  however,  suggests  '  II,  49. 

the  efficacy  ascribed  by  the  Man-  *  I,  25 ;  V,  45. 

daeans   to   the   repetition  of   pas-  *V,  45. 

sages  from  their  sacred  books.  *  I,  24, 


XIX 


O  RIG  EN  AND  C  ELS  US 


451 


Later  on  in  the  work,  in  a  passage  which  we  have 
already  cited,  Origen  waxed  indignant  with  Celsus  for 
speaking  favorably  of  the  Magi,  inventors  of  the  destructive 
magic  art.  But  now  he  speaks  almost  in  a  tone  of  respect 
of  magic,  stating  that  if  "the  so-called  magic  also  is  not,  as 
followers  of  Epicurus"  (i.  e.,  men  like  Celsus  whom  Origen 
accuses  of  being  an  Epicurean)  "and  Aristotle  think,  an  en- 
tirely chaotic  affair  but,  as  those  skilled  in  such  matters 
show,  a  connected  system  comprising  words  known  to  very 
few  persons,"  then  such  names  as  Adonai  and  Sabaoth 
"pertain  to  some  mystic  theology,"  and,  "when  pronounced 
with  that  attendant  train  of  circumstances  which  is  appro- 
priate to  their  nature,  are  possessed  of  great  power." 

These  last  clauses  make  it  clear  that  Jews  and  Chris- 
tians were  guilty  both  of  incantations  and  magic,  however 
much  Origen  may  protest  to  the  contrary.  It  can  hardly 
be  argued  that  Origen  means  to  distinguish  this  "so-called 
magic"  from  the  magic  art  which  he  condemns  in  other 
passages,  for  not  only  is  it  evident  that  the  followers  of  Epi- 
curus and  Aristotle  make  no  such  distinction,  but  Origen 
himself  in  other  passages  ascribes  the  employment  of  such 
Hebrew  names  to  ordinary  magicians  and  declares  that  such 
invocations  of  God  are  "found  in  treatises  on  magic  in  many 
countries."  ^  Origen  also  states  in  his  Commentary  upon 
Matthew  ^  that  the  Jews  are  regarded  as  adepts  in  adjura- 
tion of  demons  and  that  they  employ  adjurations  in  the  He- 
brew language  drawn  from  the  books  of  Solomon.  More- 
over, he  continues  in  the  present  passage,  "And  other  names, 
again,  current  in  the  Egyptian  tongue,  are  efficacious  against 
certain  demons  who  can  only  do  certain  things;  and  others 
in  the  Persian  language  have  corresponding  power  over 
other  spirits ;  and  so  on  in  every  different  nation,  for  differ- 
ent purposes."  ".  .  .  And  when  one  is  able  to  philosophize 
about  the  mystery  of  names,  he  will  find  much  to  say  re- 
specting the  titles  of  the  angels  of  God,  of  whom  one  is 


Origen 
admits  a 
connection 
between 
the  power 
of  words 
and  magic. 


Jewish 
and  Chris- 
tian em- 
ployment 
of  power- 
ful names 
is  really 
magic. 


*IV,  33;  I,  22,  etc. 

'In  Math.   XXVI,   23    (Migne.   PG,  XIII,  1757). 


452  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

called  Michael,  and  another  Gabriel,  and  another  Raphael, 
appropriately  to  the  duties  which  they  discharge  in  the  world. 
And  a  similar  philosophy  of  names  applies  also  to  our  Jesus." 
Between  such  mystic  theology  and  philosophy  of  names,  the 
Gnostic  diagram  of  the  Ophites,^  and  the  downright  incan- 
tations of  the  magicians,  there  is  surely  little  to  choose. 
Celsus'  From  the  names  of  God  and  angels,  by  uttering  which 

demons^  ^^^^^  wonders  may  be  performed,  we  turn  to  the  spirits 
themselves.  Celsus  seems  to  think  of  demons  as  spiritual 
beings  who  act  as  intermediaries  between  the  supreme  Deity 
and  the  world  of  nature  and  human  society.  He  believes 
that  "in  all  probability  the  various  quarters  of  the  earth 
were  from  the  beginning  allotted  to  different  superintend- 
ing spirits."  ^  He  warns  the  Christians  that  it  is  absurd  for 
them  to  think  that  they  can  escape  the  demons  by  simply 
refusing  to  eat  the  meat  that  has  been  offered  to  idols;  the 
demons  are  everywhere  in  nature,  and  one  cannot  eat  bread 
or  drink  wine  or  taste  fruit  or  breathe  the  very  air  withput 
receiving  these  gifts  of  nature  from  the  demons  to  whom 
the  various  provinces  of  nature  have  been  assigned.^  The 
Egyptians  teach  that  even  the  most  insignificant  objects  are 
committed  to  demon  care,  and  they  divide  the  human  body 
into  thirty-six  parts,  each  in  charge  of  a  demon  of  the  air 
who  should  be  invoked  in  order  to  cure  an  ailment  of  that 
particular  part.^  Celsus  mentions  some  of  the  names  of 
these  thirty-six  demons :  Chnoumen,  Chnachoumen,  Cnat, 
Sicat,  Biou,  Erou,  and  others.  Celsus,  however,  does  not 
accept  this  Egyptian  doctrine  without  qualification.  He  sus- 
pects, Origen  tells  us,  that  it  leads  toward  magic,  and  hence 
adds  "the  opinion  of  those  wise  men  who  say  that  most  of 
the  earth-demons  are  taken  up  with  carnal  indulgence,  blood, 
odors,  sweet  sounds  and  other  such  sensual  things;  and 
therefore  they  are  unable  to  do  more  than  heal  the  body, 
or  foretell  the  fortunes  of  men  and  cities,  and  do  other  such 

*See  p.  366  in  Chapter  XV  on  *VIII.  28. 

Gnosticism.  'VIII,  58. 

*V,  25. 


XIX 


0  RIG  EN  AND  C  ELS  US 


453 


things  as  relate  to  this  mortal  life."  ^  Celsus  himself,  how- 
ever, seems  as  unwilling  to  accept  this  Egyptian  view  as  he  is 
to  condone  magic,  and  concludes  that  "the  more  just  opinion 
is  that  the  demons  desire  nothing  and  need  nothing,  but  that 
they  take  pleasure  in  those  who  discharge  toward  them  of- 
fices of  piety."  ^  Celsus  believes  that  divine  providence  reg- 
ulates the  acts  of  the  demons  and  so  asks :  "Why  are  we 
not  to  serve  demons?"  ^ 

Origen's  reply  to  this  question  is  that  the  demons  are 
wicked  spirits  and  concerned  with  magic  and  idolatry.  He 
maintains  that  not  only  Christians  "but  almost  all  who 
acknowledge  the  existence  of  demons"  regard  them  as  evil 
spirits.^  His  own  attitude  toward  them  is  invariably  one 
of  hostility.  The  thirty-six  spirits  who,  as  the  Egyptians 
believe,  have  charge  of  different  parts  of  the  human  body, 
Origen  spurns  as  "thirty-six  barbarous  demons  whom  the 
Egyptian  Magi  alone  call  upon  in  some  unknown  way."  ^ 
Really  we  probably  have  here  to  do  with  the  astrological 
decans  or  sub-divisions  of  the  signs  of  the  zodiac  into  sec- 
tions of  ten  degrees  each. 

Yet  Origen's  notion  of  the  spiritual  world  rather  closely 
resembles  that  of  Celsus,  for  he  is  ready  to  ascribe  to  angels 
or  other  good  invisible  beings  much  the  same  functions 
which  Celsus  attributed  to  demons.  He  does  not,  for  ex- 
ample, dispute  the  theory  that  different  parts  of  the  earth 
and  of  nature  are  assigned  to  different  spirits.  Instead  he 
"ventures  to  lay  down  some  considerations  of  a  profounder 
kind,  conveying  a  mystical  and  secret  view  respecting  the 
original  distribution  of  the  various  quarters  of  the  earth 
among  different  superintending  spirits."  ®  He  quotes  the 
Septuagint  version  of  Deuteronomy,  "When  the  most  High 
divided  the  nations.  .  .  .  He  set  the  bounds  of  the  people  ac- 
cording to  the  number  of  the  angels  of  God."  '^  He  nar- 
rates how  after  Babel,  men  "were  conducted  by  those  angels 


^VIII,  60. 
'  VIII,  63. 
"VII,  68. 


"VIII,  59. 

'V,  28. 

'  V,  29;   see  Deut.  xxxii,  8. 


Origen 
calls 
demons 
wicked. 


But  be- 
lieves in 
presiding 
angels. 


454  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

who  imprinted  on  each  his  native  language  to  the  different 
parts  of  the  earth  according  to  their  deserts."  ^  He  con- 
cludes by  saying,  "These  remarks  are  to  be  understood  as 
being  made  by  us  with  a  concealed  meaning,"  ^  but  there 
seems  little  doubt  as  to  his  substantial  agreement  with  the 
view  of  Celsus.  Indeed,  later  when  Celsus  asserts  that 
Christians  cannot  eat,  drink,  or  breathe  without  being  in- 
debted to  demons,  Origen  responds,  "We  indeed  also  main- 
tain .  .  .  the  agency  and  control  of  certain  beings  whom  we 
may  call  invisible  husbandmen  and  guardians;  .  .  .  but  we 
deny  that  those  invisible  agents  are  demons."  ^ 

In  his  fourteenth  homily  on  Numbers,  as  extant  in  Ru- 
finus's  translation,*  Origen  again  speaks  of  presiding  angels 
in  these  words.  "And  what  is  so  pleasant,  what  is  so  mag- 
nificent as  the  work  of  the  sun  or  moon  by  whom  the  world 
is  illuminated?  Yet  there  is  work  in  the  world  itself  too  for 
angels  who  are  over  beasts  and  for  angels  who  preside  over 
earthly  armies.  There  is  work  for  angels  who  preside  over 
the  nativity  of  animals,  of  seedlings,  of  plantations,  and 
many  other  growths.  And  again  there  is  work  for  angels 
who  preside  over  holy  works,  who  teach  the  comprehension 
of  eternal  light  and  the  knowledge  of  God's  secrets  and  the 
science  of  divine  things."  How  this  passage  might  be  used 
to  encourage  a  belief  in  magic  is  made  evident  by  the  para- 
phrase of  it  in  The  Occult  Philosophy  of  Henry  Cornelius 
Agrippa,^  written  in  1510  at  the  close  of  the  middle  ages. 
He  represents  Origen  as  saying,  "There  is  work  in  the 
world  itself  for  angels  who  preside  over  earthly  armies,  king- 
doms, provinces,  men,  beasts,  the  nativity  and  growth  of 
animals,  shoots,  plants,  and  other  things,  giving  that  virtue 
which  they  say  is  in  things  from  their  occult  property." 

In  the  treatise  De  Principiis,^  Origen  states  that  particu- 
lar offices  are  assigned  to  individual  angels,  as  curing  dis- 
eases to  Raphael,  and  the  conduct  of  wars  to  Gabriel.  This 
notion  he  perhaps  derived  from  the  Book  of  Enoch  which, 

'  V,  30.  '  Migne,   PG,  XII,  680. 

*V,  Z2.  "HI,  12. 

•VIII,  31.  '1.8- 


XIX  OKI  GEN  AND  CELSUS  455 

however,  he  states  in  his  Reply  to  Celsus  is  not  accepted  by 
the  churches  as  divinely  inspired.^  He  further  declares  on 
the  authority  of  passages  in  the  New  Testament  that  to  one 
angel  the  Church  of  the  Ephesians  was  entrusted;  to  an- 
other, that  of  Smyrna;  that  Peter  had  his  angel  and  Paul 
his, — nay  that  "every  one  of  the  little  ones  of  the  Church" 
has  his  angel  who  daily  beholds  the  face  of  God.^ 

Origen   advances  a   further  theory   concerning   spirits,   A  law  of 
which  may  be  described  as  a  sort  of  law  of  spiritual  grav-  g^avka- 
itation.     It  is  that  when  souls  are  pure  and  "not  weighted   tion. 
down  with  sin  as  with  a  weight  of  lead,"  they  ascend  on 
high  where  other  pure  and  ethereal  bodies  and  spirits  dwell, 
"leaving  here  below  their  grosser  bodies  along  with  their 
impurities."     Polluted  souls,  on  the  contrary,  have  to  stay 
close  to  earth  where  they  wander  about  sepulchers  as  ghosts 
and  apparitions.^     Origen  therefore  infers  that  pagan  gods 
"who  are  attached  for  entire  ages  to  particular  dwellings 
and  places"  on  earth,  are  wicked  and  polluted  spirits.     Ori- 
gen of  course  will  not  admit  that  Christians  or  Jews  bow 
down  even  to  angels;  such  worship  they  reserve  for  God 
alone.^ 

Both  Celsus  and  Origen  closely  associate  with  the  world  Attitude 

of  invisible  spirits,  whether  these  be  angels  or  demons,  the   toward^^ 

visible  heavenly  bodies,  and  thus  lead  us  from  magic,  which  astrology. 

Origen  makes  so  dependent  upon  demons,  to  the  kindred 

subject  of  astrology,  the  pseudo-science  of  the  stars.    Celsus 

had  censured  the  Jews  and  by  implication  the  Christians 

for  worshiping  heaven  and  the  angels,  and  even  apparitions 

produced  by  sorcery  and  enchantment,  and  yet  at  the  same 

time  neglecting  what  in  his  opinion  formed  the  holiest  and 

most  powerful  part  of  the  heaven,  namely,  the  fixed  stars  and 

the  planets,  "who  prophesy  to  everyone  so  distinctly,  through 

whom  all  productiveness  results,  the  most  conspicuous  of 

supernal  heralds,  real  heavenly  angels."  ^     This  shows  that 

Celsus  was  much  more  favorably  inclined  toward  astrology 

'  V,  54;  see  Book  of  Enoch,  XL,         "  VII,  5. 
9.  "  V,  6-9. 

'Matthew.  XVIII,  10.  'V,  6. 


4S6 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


Attitude 
of  Origen 
toward 
astrology. 


than  toward  magic  and  less  sceptical  concerning  its  validity. 
Origen  also  represents  Celsus — and  furthermore  the  Stoics, 
Platonists,  and  Pythagoreans — as  believing  in  the  theory  of 
the  magnnis  anmis,  according  to  which,  when  the  celestial 
bodies  all  return  to  their  original  positions  after  the  lapse  of 
some  thousands  of  years,  history  will  begin  to  repeat  itself 
and  the  same  events  will  occur  and  the  same  persons  live 
over  again. ^  Origen  also  complains  that  Celsus  regards 
as  a  divinely-inspired  nation  the  Chaldeans,  who  were  the 
founders  of  "deceitful  genethlialogy,"  -  as  well  as  the  Magi 
whom  Celsus  elsewhere  identified  with  the  Chaldeans  or 
astrologers,  but  whom  Origen  as  we  have  seen  regards 
rather  as  the  founders  of  magic. 

Origen  is  opposed  both  to  this  art  of  casting  horoscopes 
and  determining  the  entire  life  of  the  individual  from  his 
nativity,  and  to  the  theory  of  the  magnus  annus, ^  because  he 
is  convinced  that  to  admit  their  truth  is  to  annihilate  free- 
will. But  he  is  far  from  having  freed  himself  fundamen- 
tally from  the  astrological  attitude  toward  the  stars ;  indeed 
he  still  shows  vestiges  of  the  old  pagan  tendency  to  worship 
them  as  divinities.  He  is  convinced  that  the  celestial  bodies 
are  not  mere  fiery  masses,  as  Anaxagoras  teaches.^  The 
body  of  a  star  is  material,  it  is  true,  but  also  ethereal.  But 
furthermore  Origen  is  inclined  to  agree,  both  in  the  De  prin- 
cipiis  ^  and  in  the  Contra  Celsiim,^  that  the  stars  are  ra- 
tional beings  {\oyLKa  Kal  (nrovdala — the  latter  word  had  al- 
ready been  applied  to  them  by  Philo  Judaeus)  possessed  of 
free-will  and  "illuminated  with  the  light  of  knowledge  by 
that  wisdom  which  is  the  reflection  of  everlasting  light." 
He  interprets  a  passage  in  Deuteronomy  "^  to  mean  that  the 
stars  have  in  general  been  assigned  by  God  to  all  the  na- 
tions beneath  the  heaven,  but  asserts  that  from  this  system 
of  astral  satrapies  God's  chosen  people  were  exempted.     He 


*IV,  67;  V,  20-21, 
»VI,  80. 

*Duhem  (1913-1917)  H  447, 
treats  of  "Les  Peres  de  I'figlise  et 
la  Grande  Annec." 


'V,  II. _ 

°  De  principiis,  I,  7. 

"V,   10. 

'  Dent.,  IV,  19-20. 


XIX 


OKI  GEN  AND  C ELS  US 


457 


is  willing  to  admit  that  the  stars  foretell  many  things,  and 
puts  especial  faith  in  comets  as  omens. ^  He  states  that  they 
have  appeared  on  the  eve  of  dynastic  changes,  great  wars, 
and  other  disasters,  and  inclines  also  to  agree  with  Chaere- 
mon  the  Stoic  that  they  may  come  as  signs  of  future  good, 
as  in  the  case  of  the  star  announcing  the  birth  of  Christ.^ 
But  while  Origen  will  grant  reasoning  faculties  and  a  cer- 
tain amount  of  prophetic  power  to  the  stars,  he  refuses  to 
permit  worship  of  them.  Rather  he  is  persuaded  "that  the 
sun  himself  and  moon  and  stars  pray  to  the  supreme  God 
through  his  only  begotten  Son."  ^ 

Pierre  Daniel  Huet  (i 630-1 721),  the  learned  bishop  of 
Avranches  and  editor  of  Origen,  in  his  commentaries  upon 
Origen  ^  cites  other  works,  commentaries  on  Matthew,  the 
Psalms,  the  Epistle  to  the  Romans,  and  Ezekiel,  in  which 
Origen  again  states  that  the  stars  are  reasoning  beings, 
honor  God,  praise  and  pray  to  Him,  and  even  that  they 
are  capable  of  sin,  a  point  upon  which  he  agrees  with  the 
Book  of  Enoch  and  Bardesanes  but  not  with  Philo  Judaeus. 
Nicephorus  ^  states  that  Origen  was  condemned  in  the  fifth 
synod  for  his  error  concerning  the  stars  being  animated. 
Sometimes,  however,  Huet  points  out,  Origen  leaves  it 
an  open  question  whether  the  heavenly  bodies  are  animated 
or  not.^  Huet  also  asserts  that  in  his  own  time  such  great 
men  as  Tycho  Brahe  and  Kepler  have  defended  the  view 
that  the  stars  are  animated  beings. 

In  a  fragment  from  Origen's  Commentary  on  Genesis   Further 
preserved  by  Eusebius  we  have  a  further  discussion  of  the   pscussion 
stars  and  astrology.'^     Here  he  represents  even  Christians    Commen- 
as  troubled  by  the  doctrine  that  the  stars  control  human   Genesis. 
affairs  absolutely.     This  theory  he  attacks  as  destructive  to 
all  morality,  as  rendering  prayer  to  God  of  no  avail,  and 
as  subjecting  even  such  events  as  the  birth  of  Christ  and 


*V,  12. 

'I,  59. 

"V,  II. 

*  P.  D.  Huet,  Origenianorum 
Lib.  II,  Cap.  II,  Quaestio  VIII, 
De    astris,    in    Migne,    Patrologia 


Gracca,  XVII,  973,  et  seq. 

"XVII,  28. 

'  "In  prooemio  libri  prioris 
eiusdem  Ilepi  apx^v,  num.  10." 

'  Eusebius,  Praep.  Evang.,  VI, 
II,  in  Migne,  PG,  XXI,  477-506. 


4S8 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


the  conversion  of  each  individual  to  Christianity  to  fatal 
necessity.  Like  Philo  Judaeus  Origen  holds  that  the  stars 
are  merely  signs  instituted  by  God,  not  causes  of  the  future, 
and  quotes  passages  from  the  Old  Testament  in  support  of 
his  view;  like  the  Book  of  Enoch  he  holds  that  men  were 
instructed  in  the  interpretation  of  the  stars'  significations 
by  the  fallen  angels.  He  argues  at  length  that  divine  fore- 
knowledge does  not  impose  necessity.  While,  however,  God 
instituted  the  stars  as  signs  of  the  future,  He  intended  that 
only  the  angels  should  be  able  to  read  them,  and  deemed 
it  best  for  mankind  to  remain  in  ignorance  of  the  future. 
"For  it  is  a  much  greater  task  than  lies  within  human  power 
to  learn  truly  from  the  motion  of  the  stars  what  each  per- 
son will  do  and  suffer."  ^  The  evil  spirits  have,  however, 
taught  men  the  art  of  astrology,  but  Origen  believes  that  it 
is  so  difficult  and  requires  such  superhuman  accuracy  that 
the  predictions  of  astrologers  are  more  likely  to  be  wrong 
than  right.  His  tone  toward  astrology  is  thus  distinctly 
more  unfavorable  here  than  in  the  Reply  to  Celsus.  In  ar- 
guing that  the  stars  are  merely  signs,  Origen  asks  why  men 
admit  that  the  flight  of  birds  and  condition  of  entrails  in 
augury  and  liver-divination  are  only  signs  and  yet  insist  that 
the  stars  are  causes  of  future  events.^  The  answer,  of 
course,  is  simple  enough:  all  nature  is  under  the  control  of 
the  stars  which  alike  produce  the  events  signified  and  the 
action  of  the  birds  or  condition  of  the  liver  signifying  them. 
But  the  question  is  notable  because  it  was  also  put  by  Plo- 
tinus  a  little  later  in  the  same  century. 

In  explaining  the  Book  of  Genesis  Origen  said  that  celes- 
tial and  infernal  virtues  were  represented  by  the  waters 
above  and  below  the  firmament  respectively.  This  figurative 
interpretation  gave  offence  to  many  later  Christian  writers, 
although  some  of  them  were  ready  to  interpret  the  waters 
above  as  celestial  virtues,  but  not  to  take  the  waters  below 
as  signifying  evil  spirits.^     Concerning  the  question  of  a 


*  PG,  XXI,  489. 

'Ibid.,  501-502. 
•P.    D.     Huet, 


Origenianorum 


Lib.,  II,  ii,  V.  10,  cites  Basil, 
Homil.  3  in  Hexaem.;  Epiphanius, 
Hacr.,    LXIV,    4,    and   Epist.    ad 


XIX  0  RIG  EN  AND  CELSUS  459 

plurality  of  heavens  Origen  says  in  the  Reply  to  Celsus, 
"The  Scriptures  which  are  current  in  the  Churches  of  God 
do  not  speak  of  seven  heavens  or  of  any  definite  number  at 
all,  but  they  do  appear  to  teach  the  existence  of  heavens, 
whether  that  means  the  spheres  of  those  bodies  which  the 
Greeks  call  planets  or  something  more  mysterious."  ^ 

Of  other  pagan  methods  of  divination  than  astrology  Augury, 
Origen  disapproved  and  classed  them,  as  we  have  seen,  as  and^"^^' 
the  work  of  demons.  He  was  impressed  by  the  weight  of  prophecy, 
testimony  to  the  validity  of  augury,^  although  he  states  that 
it  has  been  disputed  whether  there  is  any  such  art,  but  he 
attributed  the  truth  of  the  predictions  to  demons  acting 
through  the  animals  and  pointed  out  that  the  Mosaic  law 
forbade  augury  ^  and  classified  as  unclean  the  animals  com- 
monly employed  in  divination.  The  true  God,  he  held, 
would  not  employ  irrational  animals  at  all  to  reveal  the 
future,  nor  even  any  chance  human  being,  but  only  the  purest 
of  prophetic  souls.  Origen  would  appear  for  the  moment 
to  have  forgotten  Balaam's  ass!  Moreover,  he  himself  ac- 
cepted other  channels  of  foreknowledge  than  holy  prophecy, 
and  believed  that  dreams  often  were  of  value  in  this  respect. 
When  Celsus,  criticizing  the  Scriptural  story  of  the  flight 
into  Egypt,  stated  that  an  angel  descended  from  heaven  to 
warn  Joseph  and  Mary  of  the  danger  threatening  the  Christ 
child,  Origen  retorted  that  the  angelic  warning  came  rather 
in  a  dream — an  occurrence  which  seemed  in  no  way  mar- 
velous to  him,  since  **in  many  other  cases  it  has  happened 
that  a  dream  has  shown  persons  the  proper  course  of  ac- 
tion." ^  Origen  grants  that  all  men  desire  to  ascertain  the 
future  and  argues  that  the  Jews  must  have  had  divine 
prophets,  or,  since  they  were  forbidden  by  the  Mosaic  law  to 
consult  "observers  of  times  and  diviners,"  they  would  have 

Joan.  Jerosolymit.,  cap.  3;  Jerome,  'VI,  21. 

Epist.   61    ad   Pammach.,   cap.    3 ;  *  IV,  90-95. 

Gregory  Nyss.,   Kb.  in  Hexaem.;  '  Origen   quotes,   "Ye   shall  not 

Augustine,     Confess..     XIII,     15;  practise    augury   nor    observe   the 

Isidore,   Origin.,  VII,  5.  flight  of  birds,"  which  is  found  in 

See  also  Duhem  (1913-1917)  II,  the  Septuagint,  Lezit.,  XIX,  26. 

487,  "Les  eaux  supracelestes."  *  I,  66. 


and  gems. 


460  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

had  no  means  of  satisfying  this  universal  human  craving. 
It  was  to  slake  this  popular  curiosity  concerning  the  future, 
Origen  thinks,  that  the  Hebrew  seers  sometimes  predicted 
things  of  no  religious  significance  or  other  lasting  impor- 
tance.^ Once  Origen  alludes  to  physiognomy,  saying,  "If 
there  be  any  truth  in  the  doctrine  of  the  physiognomists, 
whether  Zopyrus  or  Loxus  or  Polemon."  ^ 
Animals  The  allusions  to  natural  science  in  the  Reply  to  Celsus 

are  not  numerous.  There  are  a  few  passages  where  animals 
or  gems  are  mentioned.  The  remarks  concerning  animals 
mention  the  usual  favorites  and  embody  familiar  notions 
which  we  either  have  already  met  or  shall  meet  again  and 
again.  Celsus  speaks  ^  of  the  knowledge  of  poisons  and 
medicines  possessed  by  animals,  of  predictions  by  birds,  of 
assemblies  held  by  other  animals,  of  the  fidelity  with  which 
elephants  observe  oaths,  of  the  filial  affection  of  the  stork, 
and  of  the  Arabian  bird,  the  phoenix.'*  Origen  implies  the 
belief  that  the  weasel  conceives  through  its  mouth  when  he 
says,  "Observe,  moreover,  to  what  pitch  of  wickedness  the 
demons  proceed,  so  that  they  even  assume  the  bodies  of 
weasels  in  order  to  reveal  the  future."  °  Origen  also  ad- 
duces the  marvelous  methods  of  generation  of  several  kinds 
of  animals  in  support  of  the  virgin  birth  of  Jesus. ^  Ori- 
gen's  allusions  to  gems  can  scarcely  be  classified  as  natural 
science.  He  contends  that  Plato's  statement  that  our  pre- 
cious stones  are  a  reflection  of  gems  in  that  better  land  is 
taken  from  Isaiah's  description  of  the  city  of  God."^  In  an- 
other passage  Origen  again  quotes  Isaiah  regarding  the 
walls,  foundations,  battlements,  and  gates  of  various  pre- 
cious stones,  but  states  that  he  cannot  stop  to  examine  their 
spiritual  meaning  at  present.®  In  one  of  his  homilies  on 
the  Book  of  Numbers  Origen  displays  a  favorable  attitude 
towards  medical  and  pharmaceutical  investigation,  saying, 

*  I,  36.  Apuleius  assume  the  bodies  of 
''I,  33-  weasels  in  order  to  rob  a  corpse. 
"  IV,  86-88.  '  I,  37. 

*  IV,  98.  '  VII,  30. 
•IV,  93;  it  will  be  recalled  that  *VIII,  19-20. 

the  witches  in  The  Golden  Ass  of 


XIX  ORIGEN  AND  CELSUS  461 

"For  if  there  is  any  science  from  God,  what  will  be  more 
from  Him  than  the  science  of  health,  in  which  too  the  vir- 
tues of  herbs  and  the  diverse  properties  of  juices  are  de- 
termined." ^ 

Ori gen's  belief  that  the  stars  were  rational  beings  con-  Origen 
tinned  to  be  held  by  the  sect  called  Origenists  and  also  by  '^^er  ac 
the  heretic  Priscillian  and  his  followers  in  the  later  fourth  counte- 
century.  Priscillian,  as  we  have  seen,  was  accused  of  magic  tnagic.^ 
and  executed  in  385.  But  we  are  surprised  to  find  The- 
ophilus  of  Alexandria,  who  attacked  some  of  Origen's  views 
as  heretical  and  persuaded  Pope  Anastasius  to  do  the  same, 
accusing  Origen  in  a  letter  written  in  405  and  translated  into 
Latin  by  Jerome,  of  having  defended  magic. ^  Theophilus 
states  that  Origen  has  written  in  one  of  his  treatises,  "The 
magic  art  seems  to  me  a  name  for  something  which  does 
not  exist" — a  bold  and  admirable  assertion,  but  one  which, 
as  we  have  seen,  the  Epicurean  Celsus  would  have  been 
much  more  likely  to  make  than  the  Christian  Origen — "but 
if  it  does,  it  is  not  the  name  of  an  evil  work."  Theophilus 
cannot  understand  how  Origen,  who  vaunts  himself  a  Chris- 
tian, can  thus  make  himself  a  protector  of  Elymas  the  ma- 
gician who  opposed  the  apostles  and  of  Jamnes  and  Mambres 
who  resisted  Moses.  Huet,  the  learned  seventeenth  century 
editor  of  Origen,  knew  of  no  such  passage  in  his  extant 
works  as  that  which  Theophilus  professes  to  quote. ^ 

*  Homily  18  on  Numbers,  Migne,  ^  Epistola    96     in     Migne,     PL, 

PG,  XII,  715.  XXII,  78. 

'  Migne,  PG,  XVII,  1091-92. 


CHAPTER  XX 

OTHER  CHRISTIAN  DISCUSSION  OF  MAGIC  BEFORE  AUGUSTINE 

Plan  of  this  chapter — Tertullian  on  magic — Astrology  attacked-^ 
Resemblance  to  Minucius  Felix — Lactantius — Hippolytus  on  magic  and 
astrology — Frauds  of  magicians  in  answering  questions — Other  tricks 
and  illusions — Defects  and  merits  of  Hippolytus'  exposure  of  magic 
and  of  magic  itself — Hippolytus'  sources — Justin  Martyr  and  others 
on  the  witch  of  Endor — Gregory  of  Nyssa  and  Eustathius  con- 
cerning the  ventriloquist — Gregory  of  Nyssa  Against  Fate — Astrology 
and  the  birth  of  Christ — Chrysostom  on  the  star  of  the  Magi — Sixth 
Homily  on  Matthew — The  spurious  homily — Number,  names,  and  home 
of  the  Magi — Liturgical  drama  of  the  Magi;  Three  Kings  of  Cologne — 
Another  homily  on  the  Magi — Priscillianists  answered — Number  and 
race  of  the  Magi  again. 

Plan  of  In  this  chapter  we  shall  supplement  the  picture  of  the  Chris- 
chapter.  *^^^  attitude  towards  magic  supplied  us  in  preceding  chap- 
ters by  some  accounts  of  magic  in  other  Christian  writers  of 
the  period  before  Augustine.  After  giving  the  opinions 
of  a  few  Latin  fathers,  Minucius  Felix,  Tertullian,  and  Lac- 
tantius, we  shall  consider  the  exposure  of  magic  devices  in 
Hippolytus'  Refutation  of  All  Heresies,  then  compare  the 
utterances  of  other  fathers  concerning  the  witch  of  Endor 
with  those  of  Origen,  and  finally  discuss  the  treatment  of 
the  Magi  and  the  star  of  Bethlehem  in  both  the  genuine  and 
the  spurious  homily  of  Chrysostom  on  that  theme,  adding 
some  account  of  the  medieval  development  of  the  legend  of 
the  three  Magi,  although  leaving  until  later  the  statements 
of  medieval  theologians  and  astronomers  concerning  the 
star  of  the  Magi.  This  makes  a  rather  omnibus  chapter, 
but  its  component  parts  are  too  brief  to  separate  as  distinct 
chapters  and  they  all  supplement  the  preceding  chapter  on 
Origen  and  Celsus. 

462 


CHAP.  XX        OTHER  CHRISTIAN  DISCUSSION  463 

Some  important  features  of  Origen's  account  of  magic  Tertullian 
are  duplicated  in  the  writings  of  the  western  church  father,  °"  magic. 
TertulHan,  who  wrote  at  about  the  same  time  or  perhaps  a 
few  years  before  Origen.  Again  the  Jews  are  represented 
as  calHng  Christ  a  magician/  and  when  TertulHan  challenges 
the  emperors  to  allow  a  Christian  exorcist  to  appear  before 
them  and  attempt  to  expel  a  demon  from  someone  so  pos- 
sessed and  force  the  spirit  to  confess  its  evil  character,  he 
expects  that  his  Christian  exorcist  will  be  accused  of  em- 
ploying magic.^  Again  divination  and  magic  are  attributed 
to  the  fallen  angels;  in  fact,  Tertullian  follows  the  Book  ' 

of  Enoch  in  stating  that  men  were  instructed  by  the  fallen 
angels  in  metallurgy  and  botany  as  well  as  in  incantations 
and  astrology.^  The  demons  are  represented  as  invisible 
and  "everywhere  in  a  moment."  Living  as  they  do  in  the 
air  near  the  clouds  and  stars,  they  are  enabled  to  predict 
the  weather.  They  send  diseases  and  then  pretend  to  cure 
them  by  the  recommendation  of  novel  remedies  or  prescrip- 
tions quite  contrary  to  accepted  medical  practice.^  "There 
is  hardly  a  human  being  who  is  unattended  by  a  demon."  ^ 
Magicians  are  described  by  Tertullian  as  producing  phan- 
tasms, insulting  the  souls  of  the  dead,  injuring  boys  for 
purposes  of  divination,  sending  dreams,  and  performing 
many  miraculous  feats  by  their  complicated  jugglery.* 
"The  science  of  magic"  is  well  defined  as  "a  multiform  con- 
tagion of  the  human  mind,  an  artificer  of  every  error,  a  de- 
stroyer of  safety  and  soul."  As  examples  of  well-known 
magicians  Tertullian  lists  Ostanes  and  Typhon  and  Dar- 
danus  and  Damigeron  "^  and  Nectabis  ^  and  Berenice.     Ter- 

^  Tertullian,    Apology,    cap.    21 ;  Lithica,    and    in    the   Apology   of 

so  also  Cyprian,  Liber  de  idolorum  Apuleius,  cap.  45 ;  is  cited  in  the 

vanitate,   cap.    13.     Latin   text   of  Geoponica,  and   was    regarded  by 

Tertullian  in  PL,  vols.  1-2;  Eng-  V.   Rose  as  the   Greek  source  of 

lish  translation  in  AN,  vol.  3.  the  Latin  "Evax"  and  Marbod  on 

'Apology,  cap.  23.  stones.     BN    7418,    14th    century, 

^ De  cultu  feminarum,  I,  2.  Amigeronis       de       lapidibus,  was 

*  Apology,  cap.  22.  printed    by    Pitra,    Spic.   Solcsm., 

^ De  anima,  cap.  57.  Ill,     324-35,     and     Abel,     Orphei 

^Apology,  cap.  23.  Lithica,  p.   157,  et  seq.     See  fur- 

''  De  anima,  cap.  57.    Damigeron  ther  PW,  "Damigeron." 

is  mentioned  in  the  Orphic  poem,  *  Presumably   Nectanebus. 


464  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

tullian  states  that  a  literature  is  current  which  promises  to 
evoke  ghosts  from  the  infernal  regions,  but  that  in  such 
cases  the  dead  are  really  impersonated  by  demons,  as  was 
the  fact  when  the  p)rthoness  seemed  to  show  Samuel  to  Saul, 
a  point  on  which  Tertullian  disagrees  with  Origen.  Magic  is 
therefore  fallacious,  a  point  which  Tertullian  emphasizes 
more  than  Origen  did,  although  Tertullian  is  not  very  ex- 
plicit. He  avers  that  "it  is  no  great  task  to  deceive  the 
outer  eye  of  him  whose  mental  insight  it  is  easy  to  blind." 
The  rods  of  Pharaoh's  magicians  seemed  to  turn  into  snakes, 
"but  Moses'  ^  reality  devoured  their  deceit." 
Astrologj-  Tertullian   further  diverges   from  Origen   in   definitely 

classifying  astrology  as  a  species  of  magic  along  with  that 
other  variety  of  magic  which  works  miracles.  Astrology  is 
an  art  which  was  invented  by  the  fallen  angels  and  with 
which  Christians  should  have  nothing  to  do.  Tertullian 
would  not  mention  it  but  for  the  fact  that  recently  a  certain 
person  has  defended  his  persistence  in  that  profession,  that 
is,  presumably  after  he  had  become  a  Christian.  Tertul- 
lian states,  again  unlike  Origen,  that  the  Magi  who  came 
from  the  east  to  the  Christ  child  were  astrologers — "We 
know  the  union  existing  between  magic  and  astrology" — 
but  that  Christ's  followers  are  under  no  obligation  to  as- 
trology on  their  account,  although  he  again  implies  the  ex- 
istence of  Christian  astrologers  in  the  sarcastic  remark, 
"Astrology  now-a-days,  forsooth,  treats  of  Christ;  is  the 
science  of  the  stars  of  Christ,  not  of  Saturn  and  Mars." 
As  Origen  affirmed  that  the  power  of  the  demons  and  of 
magic  was  greatly  weakened  by  the  birth  of  Christ,  so  Ter- 
tullian affirm,s  that  the  science  of  the  stars  was  allowed  to 
exist  until  the  coming  of  the  Gospel,  but  that  since  Christ's 
birth  no  one  should  cast  nativities.  "For  since  the  Gospel 
you  will  never  find  sophist  or  Chaldean  or  enchanter  or 
diviner  or  magician  who  has  not  been  manifestly  pun- 
ished." ^     Tertullian  rejoices  that  the  mathematici  or  as- 

*It  is  Aaron's  rod  in  the  King  ^  De  idolatria,  cap.  9. 

James  version. 


XX  OTHER  CHRISTIAN  DISCUSSION  465 

trologers  are  forbidden  to  enter  Rome  or  Italy,  the  reason 
being,  as  he  states  in  another  passage,^  that  they  are  con- 
sulted so  much  in  regard  to  the  life  of  the  emperor. 

Tertullian's  account  of  magic  is  perhaps  borrowed  from  Resem- 
the  dialogue  entitled  Octavius  by  M.  Minucius  Felix, ^  which  Mlnucius 
is  generally  regarded  as  the  oldest  extant  work  of  Christian  Felix. 
Latin  literature  and  was  probably  written  in  the  reign  of 
Marcus  Aurelius.  Some  of  the  words  and  phrases  used  by 
Tertullian  and  Minucius  Felix  in  describing  magic  are  almost 
identical,^  and  a  third  passage  of  the  same  sort  appears  in 
Cyprian  of  Carthage  in  the  third  century.*  Ostanes,  one  of 
Tertullian's  list  of  magicians,  is  also  mentioned  as  the  first 
prominent  magician  by  both  Minucius  Felix  and  Cyprian. 
Minucius  Felix  ascribes  magic  to  demons  and  seems  to  re- 
gard it  as  a  deceptive  and  rather  unreal  art,  saying,  "The 
magicians  not  only  are  acquainted  with  demons,  but  what- 
ever miraculous  feats  they  perform,  they  do  through 
demons;  under  their  influence  and  inspiration  they  produce 
illusions,  making  things  seem  to  be  which  are  not,  or  mak- 
ing real  things  seem  non-existent." 

A  century  after  Tertullian  Lactantius  of  Gaul  treats  of  Lactan- 
magic  and  demons  in  about  the  same  way  in  his  Divine  In-  **"^* 
stitntes,^  written  at  the  opening  of  the  fourth  century.  He 
denies  that  Christ  was  a  magician  and  declares  that  His 
miracles  differed  from  those  attributed  to  Apuleius  and 
Apollonius  of  Tyana  in  that  they  were  announced  before- 
hand by  the  prophets.  **He  worked  marvels,"  Lactantius 
says  to  his  opponents,  "and  we  should  have  thought  Him  a 
magician,  as  you  think  now  and  as  the  Jews  thought  at  the 
time,  had  not  all  the  prophets  with  one  accord  predicted  that 
Christ  would  do  these  very  things."  ^     Lactantius  believes 

^Apology,  cap.  35.  edunt  ...  si  multa   miracula  cir- 

"  PL,  vol.  3 ;  AN,  vol.  4,  culatoriis  praestigiis   ludunt." 

"  Thus     Minucius     Felix     says,  *  Cyprian,     Liber     de     idolorum 

Octavius,     cap.      26,     "Magi  .  .  .  vanitate,  caps.  6-7. 

quidquid       miraculi       ludunt  ...  *  PL,  vol.  VI ;  AN,  vol.  VII ;  the 

praestigias     edunt,"     while     Ter-  following    references    are    all    to 

tullian.   Apology,   cap.   23,   writes,  this  work. 

"Porro    si    et    magi    phantasmata  *  V,  3, 


466 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Hippoly- 
tus  on 
magic  and 
astrology. 


that  the  offspring  of  the  fallen  angels  and  "the  daughters  of 
men"  were  a  different  variety  of  demon  from  their  fathers 
and  more  terrestrial.  Be  that  as  it  may,  he  affirms  that  the 
entire  art  and  power  of  the  magicians  consist  in  invocations 
of  demons  who  "deceive  human  vision  by  blinding  illusions 
so  that  men  do  not  see  what  does  exist  and  think  that  they 
see  what  does  not  exist,"  ^  the  very  expression  that  we  have 
just  heard  from  Minucius  Felix.  More  specifically  Lactan- 
tius  regards  necromancy,  oracles,  liver-divination,  augury, 
and  astrology  as  all  invented  by  the  demons.^  Like  Origen 
he  emphasizes  the  power  of  the  sign  of  the  cross  and  the 
name  of  Jesus  against  the  evil  spirits,^  and  he  implies  the 
power  of  the  names  of  spirits  when  he  states  that,  although 
demons  may  masquerade  under  other  forms  and  names  in 
pagan  temples  and  worships,  in  magic  and  sorcery  they  are 
always  summoned  by  their  true  names,  those  celestial  ones 
which  are  read  in  sacred  literature.* 

From  these  accounts  of  magic  in  Latin  fathers,  which 
do  little  more  than  reinforce  the  impressions  which  we  had 
already  gained  concerning  the  Christian  attitude,  we  come 
to  a  very  different  discussion  by  Hippolytus  who  wrote  in 
Greek  although  he  lived  in  Italy.  Eusebius  and  Jerome 
state  that  Origen  as  a  young  man  heard  Hippolytus  preach 
at  Rome;  in  235  he  was  exiled  to  Sardinia;  the  next  year 
his  body  was  brought  back  to  Rome  for  burial.  In  Hippoly- 
tus, instead  of  attacks  upon  astrology  as  impious,  immoral, 
and  fatalistij:,  and  upon  magic  as  evil  and  the  work  of 
demons,  we  have  an  attempt  to  prove  astrology  irrational 
and  impracticable,  and  to  show  that  magic  is  based  upon 
imposture  and  deceit.  In  the  first  four  of  the  nine  books 
of  his  Philosophiimena  or  Refutation  of  All  Heresies  ^  Hip- 
polytus set  forth  the  tenets  of  the  Greek  philosophers,  the 
system  of  the  astrologers,  and  the  practice  of  the  magicians 

'II,  IS. 
'II,  17. 
•IV,  27. 
MI,  17. 

"The    work   was   discovered    in 
1842  at  Mount  Athos  and  edited 


by  E.  Miller  in  1851,  Duncker  and 
Schneidewin  in  1859,  and  Abbe 
Cruice  in  i860.  Greek  text  in  PG, 
vol.  XVI,  part  3 ;  English  transla- 
tion in  AN,  vol.  V. 


XX 


OTHER  CHRISTIAN  DISCUSSION 


467 


In  order  later  to  be  able  to  show  how  much  the  various  here- 
tics had  borrowed  from  these  sources.  His  second  and  third 
books  are  not  extant ;  it  is  in  the  fourth  book  or  what  is  left 
of  it  that  we  have  portions  of  his  discussion  of  astrology  and 
magic.^ 

In  exposing  the  frauds  of  magicians  Hippolytus  uses  the 
word  judTos,  and  not  yo-qs,  a  sorcerer.  He  tells  how  the 
magicians  pretend  that  the  spirits  give  response  through  a 
medium  to  questions  which  those  consulting  them  have 
written  on  papyrus,  perhaps  in  invisible  ink,  and  folded  up, 
after  which  the  papyrus  is  placed  on  coals  and  burned.  The 
magician,  however,  operating  in  semi-darkness  and  making 
a  great  noise  and  diversion  and  pretending  to  invoke  the 
demon,  is  really  occupied  in  sprinkling  the  burnt  papyrus 
with  a  mixture  of  water  and  copperas  (vitriol?)  or  fumi- 
gating it  with  vapor  of  a  gall  nut  or  employing  other  meth- 
ods to  make  the  concealed  letters  visible.  Having  by  some 
such  method  discovered  the  question,  he  instructs  the  me- 
dium, who  is  now  supposed  to  be  possessed  of  demons  and 
is  reclining  upon  a  couch,  what  answer  to  give  by  whis- 
pering to  him  through  a  long  hidden  tube  constructed  out 
of  the  windpipe  of  a  crane  or  ten  brass  pipes  fitted  together. 
It  will  be  recalled  that  it  was  by  such  a  tube  made  of  the 
windpipes  of  cranes  that  Alexander  the  false  prophet,  ac- 
cording to  Lucian,  caused  the  artificial  head  of  his  god  to 
give  forth  oracles.  Hippolytus  adds  that  at  the  same  time 
the  magician  produces  alarming  flames  and  liquids  by  such 
chemical  mixtures  as  fossil  salts  and  Etruscan  wax  and  a 
grain  of  salt.  "And  when  this  is  consumed,  the  salts  bound 
upward  and  give  the  impression  of  a  strange  vision."  ^ 

Hippolytus  also  reveals  how  magicians  secretly  fill  eggs 
with  dyes,  how  they  cause  sheep  to  behead  themselves  against 
a  sword  by  smearing  their  throats  with  a  drug  which  makes 
them  itch,  how  a  ram  dies  if  its  head  is  merely  bent  back 
facing  the  sun,  how  they  obstruct  the  ears  of  goats  with 

*  R.     Ganschinietz,     Hippolyto^      text. 


Frauds  of 
magicians 
in  answer- 
ing ques- 
tions. 


Other 
tricks  and 
illusions. 


Capitel  gegen  die  Magier,  1913,  in 
TU,  39,  2,  is  a  commentary  on  the 


28. 


'Refutation  of  All  Heresies,  IV, 


468 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Defects 
and  merits 
of  Hippo- 
lytus'  ex- 
posure of 
magic  and 
of  magic 
itself. 


wax  SO  that  they  cannot  breathe  and  presently  die  of  suffo- 
cation, how  out  of  sea  foam  they  make  a  compound  which, 
like  alcohol,  will  itself  burn  but  not  consume  the  objects 
over  which  it  is  poured.-^  He  tells  how  the  magician  pro- 
duces stage  thunder,  how  he  is  able  to  plunge  his  hand  into 
a  boiling  cauldron  or  walk  over  hot  coals  without  being 
burnt,  and  how  he  can  set  a  seeming  pyramid  of  stone  on 
fire.  He  tells  how  the  magicians  loosen  seals  and  seal  them 
up  again,  just  as  Lucian  did  in  his  Alexander  or  The  Pseudo- 
Prophet;  how  by  means  of  trap-doors,  mirrors,  and  the  like 
devices  they  show  demons  in  a  cauldron;  how  they  pretend 
to  show  flaming  demons  by  igniting  drawings  which  they 
have  sketched  on  the  wall  with  some  inflammable  substance 
or  by  loosing  a  bird  which  has  been  set  on  fire.  They  make 
the  moon  appear  indoors  and  imitate  the  starry  sky  by  at- 
taching fish  scales  to  the  ceiling.  They  produce  the  sensa- 
tion of  an  earthquake  by  burning  the  ordure  of  a  weasel 
with  the  stone  magnet  upon  an  open  fire.  They  construct  a 
false  skull  from  the  caul  of  an  ox,  some  wax,  and  some  gum, 
make  it  speak  by  means  of  a  hidden  tube,  and  then  cause  it 
suddenly  to  collapse  and  disappear  or  to  burn  up.^ 

This  exposition  of  the  frauds  of  the  magicians  by  Hippo- 
lytus  is  rather  broken  and  incoherent,  at  least  in  the  form 
in  which  his  text  has  reached  us.^  Also  we  do  not  have 
much  more  faith  in  some  of  the  methods  by  which  he  says 
the  feats  of  magic  are  really  done  than  he  has  in  the  ways 
by  which  the  magicians  claim  to  perform  them.  But  while 
his  notions  of  the  chemical  action  of  certain  substances  and 
of  the  occult  virtue  of  others  may  be  incorrect,  the  note- 


*  Since  writing  this  sentence  I 
have  found  an  article  by  Diels  on 
the  discovery  of  alcohol  in  So- 
cietas  Regia  Scientiarum,  Abhandl. 
Philos.-Hist.  Classe,  Berlin,  1913, 
in  which  he  argues  from  this 
passage  in  Hippolytus  that  the 
discovery  was  made  in  the  Alex- 
andrian period  and  that  it  reached 
western  Europe  again  only 
through  the  Arabs  about  the 
twelfth   century,   since   alcohol  is 


not  mentioned  in  the  older 
Schlettstadt  version  of  the  Mappae 
clazncufa.  If  this  be  so,  Adelard 
of  Bath  was  perhaps  the  first  to 
introduce  it  from  the  Arabs  or 
the  orient,  although  Diels  does 
not  say  so. 

^Refutation  of  All  Heresies,  IV, 
29-41. 

'  In  some  places  the  text  is  il- 
legible. 


XX  OTHER  CHRISTIAN  DISCUSSION  469 

worthy  point  is  that  he  endeavors  to  explain  magic  either 
as  a  deception  or  as  employing  natural  substances  and  forces 
to  simulate  supernatural  action,  and  that  his  exposure  of 
magic  devices  leaves  no  place  for  the  action  of  demons. 
Moreover,  v^e  see  that  magic  fraud  involves  chemical  ex- 
periment and  considerable  knowledge  or  error  in  the  field 
of  natural  science.  Under  the  guise  or  tyranny  of  magic 
experimental  science  is  at  work. 

The  question  then  arises  whether  Hippolytus  himself  Hippoly 
discovered  these  tricks  of  the  magicians  or  whether  he  is  sources, 
simply  copying  his  explanations  of  them  from  some  previous 
work.  An  examination  of  the  earlier  chapters  of  his  fourth 
book  is  sufficient  to  solve  the  question.  His  arguments 
against  the  practice  of  the  Chaldean  astrologers  of  predict- 
ing man's  life  from  his  horoscope  at  the  time  of  his  birth 
are  drawn  from  the  pages  of  the  sceptical  philosopher,  Sextus 
Empiricus,  whom  he  follows  so  closely  that  his  editors  are 
able  to  rectify  his  text  by  reference  to  the  parallel  passage 
in  Sextus.  We  are  therefore  probably  safe  in  assuming, 
especially  in  view  of  the  resemblances  to  the  Alexander  of 
Lucian  which  have  already  been  noted,  that  Hippolytus' 
attack  on  magic  is  also  largely  indebted  to  some  classical 
work,  possibly  to  that  very  treatise  against  magic  by  Celsus 
to  which  both  Origen  and  Lucian  refer,  or  perhaps  to  some 
account  of  apparatus  with  which  to  work  marvels  like  Hero's 
Pneumatics. 

Turning  back  now  to  the  subject  of  the  witch  of  Endor,    Justin 
we  find  that  some  of  the  church  fathers  agree  with  Origen   ^,^Y  ^^ 
rather  than  Tertullian  that  the  witch  really  invoked  Samuel,    others  on 
Before  Origen' s  time  Justin  Martyr  in  The  Dialogue  zvitJi   of  Endor. 
Trypho  ^  had  mentioned  as  a  proof  of  the  immortality  of 
the  soul  "the  fact  that  the  soul  of  Samuel  was  called  up  by 
the  witch,  as  Saul  demanded."     Huet,  who  edited  the  writ- 
ings of  Origen,  lists  other  Christian  authors  ^  who  agreed 

^  Cap.  105.  Anastasius  Antiochenus,     '05riy6s, 

*Leo    Allatius    "in    syntagmate"  quaest.,   112;  "et  eorum  quos  lau- 

De  engastrimytho,  cap,  7 ;  Sulpicius  dat     Bellarminus     liber     IV     de 

Severus,   Historia   sacra,   liber    I;  C/imfo,  cap.  11." 


470  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

with  Origen  on  this  question,  and  further  informs  us  that 
the  ancient  rabbis  were  wont  to  say  that  a  soul  invoked  with- 
in a  year  after  its  death  as  Samuel's  was,  would  be  seen  by 
the  ventriloquist  but  not  heard,  and  heard  by  the  person 
consulting  it  but  not  seen,  an  observation  which  suggests 
that  Saul  was  deceived  by  ventriloquism,  while  by  others 
present  the  ghost  would  be  neither  seen  nor  heard. 
Gregory  Two  ecclesiastics  of  the  fourth  century  composed  spe- 

°  dE^-^  cial  treatises  upon  the  ventriloquist  or  witch  of  Endor  in 
stathius  which  they  took  the  opposite  view  from  that  of  Origen. 
the  ven-  The  briefer  of  these  two  treatises  is  by  Gregory  of  Nyssa  •"■ 
tnloquist.  Y^i^Q  states,  without  mentioning  Origen  by  name,  that  some 
previous  writers  have  contended  that  Samuel  was  truly  in- 
voked by  magic  with  divine  permission  in  order  that  he 
might  see  his  mistake  in  having  called  Saul  the  enemy  of  ven- 
triloquists. But  Gregory  believes  that  Samuel  was  already 
in  paradise  and  hence  could  not  be  invoked  from  the  in- 
fernal regions;  but  that  it  was  a  demon  from  the  infernal 
regions  who  predicted  to  Saul,  "To-morrow  you  and  Jona- 
than shall  be  with  me,"  The  longer  treatise  of  Eustathius 
of  Antioch  is  a  direct  answer  to  Origen's  argument  as  its 
title,  Concerning  the  Ventriloquist  against  Origen,^  indi- 
cates. Eustathius  holds  that  it  was  illegal  to  consult  ven- 
triloquists in  view  of  Saul's  own  previous  action  against 
them  and  other  prohibitions  in  Scripture,  and  that  Origen's 
remarks  are  to  be  deplored  as  tending  to  encourage  simple 
men  to  resort  to  arts  of  divination.  Eustathius  contends  that 
the  witch  did  not  invoke  Samuel  but  only  made  Saul  think 
that  she  did,  and  that  Saul  himself  did  not  see  Samuel. 
Pharaoh's  magicians  similarly  deceived  the  imagination  with 
shadows  and  specters  when  they  pretended  to  turn  rods  into 
snakes  and  water  into  blood.  Eustathius  does  not  agree 
with  Origen  that  Samuel  was  in  hell.  He  holds  that  the 
predictions  made  by  the  pseudo-Samuel  were  not  impossible 
for  a  demon  to  make,  and  indeed  were  not  strictly  accurate, 

^HeplT^s  'eyya<TTpi.ix{)dov,VG,  XLV,  '^  Migne,  PG,  XVIII,  613-74. 

107-14. 


XX  OTHER  CHRISTIAN  DISCUSSION  471 

since  Saul  did  not  die  the  very  next  day  but  the  day  after 
it,  and  since  not  only  Jonathan  but  his  three  sons  were  slain 
with  him.^  Furthermore,  David  was  already  so  prominent 
in  public  affairs  that  a  demon  might  easily  guess  that  he 
would  succeed  Saul. 

Gregory   of   Nyssa  also   composed   a   treatise,   entitled   Gregory 
Against  Fate,"  in  the  form  of  a  disputation  between  a  pagan   Agams^ 
philosopher  and  himself  at  Constantinople  in  382  A.  D.    His  ■^"^^• 
opponent  holds  that  the  life  of  man  is  determined  by  the  con- 
stellations at  his  nativity,  upon  whose  decree  even  conver- 
sion to  Christianity  would  thus  be  made  dependent.     Greg- 
ory assumes  the  position  of  one  hitherto  ignorant  of  the 
principles  of  the  art  of  astrology,  of  which  the  philosopher 
has  to  inform  him,  but  on  general  grounds  it  seems  very 
unlikely  that  he  really  was  as  ignorant  as  this  of  such  a  wide- 
spread superstition.     Furthermore,  he  is  sufficiently  read  in 
the  subject  to  incorporate  some  of  Bardesanes'  arguments, 
of  whose  treatise  both  Gregory's  title  and  dialogue  form  are 
reminiscent.    Some  of  Gregory's  reasoning,  however,  might 
well  be  that  of  a  tyro  and  is  scarcely  worth  elaborating  here. 

When  the  writer  of  the  Gospel  according  to  Matthew   Astrology 
included  the  story  of  the  wise  men  from  the  east  who  had   birth  of 
seen  the  star,  there  can  be  little  or  no  doubt  that  he  in-   ^^nst. 
serted  it  and  that  it  had  been  formulated  in  the  first  place, 
not  merely  in  order  to  satisfy  the  ordinary,  unlearned  reader 
with  portents  connected  with  the  birth  of  Jesus,  but  to  secure 
the  appearance  of  support  for  the  kingship  of  Jesus  from 
that  art  or  science  of  astrology  which  so  many  persons  then 
held  in  high  esteem.    To  an  age  whose  sublimest  science  was 
star-gazing  it  would  seem  fitting  and  almost  inevitable  that 
God  should  have  announced  the  coming  of  the  Prince  of 
Peace  in  this  manner,  and  the  account  in  the  Gospel  of  Mat- 
thew is  in  a  sense  an  attempt  to  present  the  birth  of  Christ 
in  a  way  to  comply  with  the  most  searching  tests  of  contem- 

^  The  King  James  version,  First      be  with  me,"  instead  of  "thou  and 
Samuel,  XXVIII,   19,  reads,  "and       Jonathan." 
to  morrow  shalt  thou  and  thy  sons         ^  Migne,  PG,  XII,  143-74. 


472  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

porary  science.  But  the  early  Christians  were  relatively 
rude  and  unlettered,  and  this  effort  to  construct  a  royal  horo- 
scope for  Jesus  is  a  crude  and  faulty  one  from  the  astrologi- 
cal standpoint.  For  this,  however,  the  author  of  the  Gos- 
pel and  not  the  art  of  astrology  is  obviously  responsible.  As 
a  result,  however,  of  the  Gnostic  reaction  against  astrologi- 
cal fatalism  or  of  an  orthodox  Christian  opposition  to  both 
Gnostics  and  astrologers,  most  of  the  early  fathers  of  the 
church  denied  that  this  passage  implied  any  recognition  of 
the  truth  of  astrology  and  attempted  to  explain  away  its 
obvious  meaning.  In  doing  this  they  often  made  the  crude 
and  imperfect  astrology  of  the  Gospel  a  criterion  for  criti- 
cizing the  art  of  astrology  itself. 
Chrysos-  Of  patristic  commentaries  upon  the  passage  in  the  Gos- 

star  of  P^^  ^^  Matthew  dealing  with  the  Magi  and  the  star  of  Beth- 
the  Magi,  lehem  one  of  the  fullest  and  most  frequently  cited  by  me- 
dieval writers  is  that  attributed  to  Chrysostom.  I  say  ''at- 
tributed," because  in  addition  to  his  genuine  sixth  homily 
upon  Matthew  ^  there  was  generally  ascribed  to  Chrysostom 
in  the  middle  ages  another  homily  which  is  extant  only  in 
Latin  ^  and  has  been  thought  to  be  the  work  of  some  Arian. 
The  famous  St.  John  Chrysostom  was  born  at  Antioch 
about  347  A.  D.  and  there  studied  rhetoric  under  the  noted 
sophist  Libanius.  From  398  to  404  he  held  the  office  of 
patriarch  of  Constantinople;  then  he  was  exiled  to  Cappa- 
docia  where  he  died  in  407.  One  detail  of  his  boyhood  may 
be  noted  because  of  its  connection  with  magic.  When  he 
was  a  lad,  the  tyrants  in  the  city  became  suspicious  of  plots 
against  them  and  sent  soldiers  to  search  for  books  of  magic 
and  sorcery.  One  of  the  men  who  was  arrested  and  put.  to 
death  had  tried  to  rid  himself  of  the  damaging  possession 
of  a  book  of  magic  by  throwing  it  into  the  river.  Chrysos- 
tom and  a  playmate  later  unsuspectingly  fished  an  object  out 
of  the  water  which  turned  out  to  be  this  very  book,  and 

*  Migne,  PG,  LVI,  61,  et  seq.  nomine  circumfertur."     Ibid.,  602, 

*  Migne,  PG,  LVI,  637,  et  seq.  et  seq.,  for  opinions  of  various 
Homily  II,  "Opus  imperfectum  in  past  writers  as  to  its  authenticity. 
Matthacum      quod      Chrysostonii 


XX 


OTHER  CHRISTIAN  DISCUSSION 


473 


when  a  soldier  happened  to  pass  by  just  then,  they  were  very 
frightened  lest  he  should  see  what  they  had  and  they  should 
be  severely  punished  for  it.^ 

In  his  sixth  homily  upon  Matthew  Chrysostom  recog- 
nizes the  difficulties  presented  by  the  Scriptural  account  of 
the  Magi  and  the  star,  and  approaches  the  task  of  expound- 
ing it  with  prayers  to  God  for  aid.  Some,  he  informs  us, 
take  the  passage  as  an  admission  of  the  truth  of  astrology. 
It  is  this  opinion  which  he  is  concerned  to  refute.  He  ar- 
gues that  it  is  not  the  function  of  astronomy  to  learn  from 
the  stars  who  are  being  born  but  merely  to  predict  from  the 
hour  of  birth  what  is  going  to  happen,  which  seems  a  quite 
fallacious  distinction  upon  his  part.  He  also  criticizes  the 
Magi  for  calling  Jesus  the  king  of  the  Jews,  when  as  Christ 
told  Pilate  His  kingdom  was  not  of  this  world.  He  further 
criticizes  them  for  coming  to  Christ's  birthplace  when  they 
might  have  known  that  it  would  cause  difficulties  with 
Herod,  the  existing  king,  and  for  coming,  making  trouble, 
and  then  immediately  going  back  home  again.  But  these 
shortcomings  would  seem  to  be  those  of  the  Scriptural  nar- 
rative rather  than  of  the  art  of  astrology,  although  of  course 
Chrysostom  is  trying  to  make  the  point  that  the  Magi  had 
not  foreseen  what  would  happen  to  themselves.  He  fur- 
ther argues  that  the  star  of  Bethlehem  was  not  like  other 
stars  nor  even  a  star  at  all,"  as  was  proved  by  its  peculiar 
itinerary,  its  shining  by  day,  its  rare  intelligence  in  hiding 
itself  at  the  right  time,  and  its  miraculous  ability  in  stand- 
ing over  the  head  of  the  child.     Chrysostom  therefore  con- 


^Migne.  PG,  LX,  274-5,  in  the 
38th  homily  on  the  Book  of  Acts. 

^  On  the  other  hand,  D.  Fried- 
rich  Miinter,  Der  Stern  der  Wei- 
sen:  Untersuchungen  iiber  das 
Geburtsjahr  Christi,  Kopenhagen, 
1827,  adopted  the  astrological 
theory  that  the  star  of  Bethlehem 
was  really  a  major  conjunction  of 
Saturn  and  Jupiter  in  Pisces, 
which  Jewish  tradition,  too,  seems 
to  have  regarded  as  the  sign  of 
the  Messiah,  and  that  therefore 
Jesus  was  born  in  6  B.  C.     This 


view  had  already  been  advanced 
by  Kepler,  but  recent  writers  seem 
to  prefer  a  conjunction  in  Aries: 
see  H.  G.  Voigt,  Die  Geschichte 
Jesu  und  die  Astrologie,  Leipzig, 
191 1 ;  Kritzinger,  Der  Stern  der 
Weisen,  Giitersloh,  191 1;  von 
Oefele,  Die  Angaben  der  Berliner 
Planetcntafel  P827g  verglichen  mit 
der  GebiirtsgeschicJite  Christi  im 
Berichte  des  Matthdus,  Berlin, 
1903,  in  Mitteil.  d.  V orderasiati- 
schen  Gesellschaft. 


Sixth 
homily  on 
Matthew. 


474  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

eludes  that  some  invisible  virtue  put  on  the  form  of  a  star. 
He  thinks  that  the  star  appeared  to  the  Magi  as  a  reflection 
upon  the  Jews,  who  had  rejected  prophet  after  prophet, 
whereas  the  apparition  of  a  single  star  was  sufficient  to  bring 
barbarian  Magi  to  the  feet  of  Christ.  At  the  same  time  he 
believes  that  God  especially  favored  the  Magi  in  vouchsafing 
them  a  star,  a  sign  to  which  they  were  accustomed,  as  the 
mode  of  announcement.  Thus  he  comes  dangerously  near 
to  admitting  tacitly  what  he  has  just  been  denying,  namely, 
that  the  stars  are  signs  of  the  future  and  that  there  is  some- 
thing in  the  art  of  astrology.  In  short,  the  star  appeared 
to  the  Magi  because  they  as  astrologers  would  comprehend 
its  meaning.  Chrysostom  denies  this  openly  and  does  his 
best  to  think  up  arguments  against  it,  but  he  cannot  rid  his 
subconscious  thought  of  the  idea. 
The  The  other  homily  ascribed  to  Chrysostom  repeats  some 

spurious  q£  |-j^g  points  made  in  the  genuine  homily,  but  adds  others. 
The  preacher  has  read  somewhere,  perhaps  in  Origen  where 
we  have  already  met  the  suggestion,  that  the  Magi  had 
learned  that  the  star  would  appear  from  the  books  of  the 
diviner  Balaam,  "whose  divination  is  also  put  into  the  Old 
Testament :  *A  star  shall  arise  from  Jacob  and  a  man  shall 
come  forth  from  Israel,  and  he  shall  rule  all  nations.'  "  But 
the  preacher  does  not  state  why  it  is  any  better  to  have  such 
a  prediction  made  by  a  diviner  than  by  an  astrologer.  The 
preacher  has  also  heard  some  cite  a  writing,  which  is  not 
surely  authentic  but  yet  is  not  destructive  to  the  Faith  and 
rather  pleasing,  to  the  effect  that  in  the  extreme  east  on 
the  shores  of  the  ocean  live  a  people  who  possess  a  writing 
inscribed  with  the  name  of  Seth  and  dealing  with  the  ap- 
pearance of  this  star  and  the  gifts  to  be  offered.  This 
writing  was  handed  down  from  father  to  son  through  suc- 
cessive generations,  and  twelve  of  the  most  studious  men  of 
their  number  were  chosen  to  watch  for  the  coming  of  the 
star,  and  whenever  one  died,  another  was  chosen  in  his 
place.  They  were  called  Magi  in  their  language  because 
they  glorified  God  silently.    Every  year  after  the  threshing 


XX  OTHER  CHRISTIAN  DISCUSSION  475 

of  the  harvest  they  climbed  a  mountain  to  a  cave  with  de- 
lightful springs  shaded  by  carefully  selected  trees.  There 
they  washed  themselves  and  for  three  days  in  silence  prayed 
and  praised  God.  Finally  one  year  the  star  appeared  in 
the  form  of  a  little  child  with  the  likeness  of  a  cross  above 
it;  and  it  spoke  with  them  and  taught  them  and  instructeji 
them  to  set  out  for  Judea.^  When  they  had  set  out,  it  went 
before  them  for  two  years,  during  which  time  food  and 
drink  were  never  lacking  in  their  wallets.  On  their  return 
they  worshiped  and  glorified  God  more  sedulously  than 
ever  and  preached  to  their  people.  Finally,  after  the  resur- 
rection, the  apostle  Thomas  visited  that  region  and  they 
were  baptized  by  him  and  were  made  his  assistant  preachers. 
This  tale  is  indeed  pleasing  enough,  and  it  saves  the  Magi 
from  all  imputation  of  magic  arts  and  employment  of 
demons  and  even  denies  that  they  were  astrologers.  But 
as  a  device  to  escape  the  natural  inference  from  the  Gospel 
story  that  the  birth  of  Christ  was  announced  by  the  stars 
and  in  a  way  which  astronomers  could  comprehend  it  is  cer- 
tainly far-fetched,  and  shows  how  Christian  theologians 
were  put  to  it  to  find  a  way  out  of  the  difficulty.  The 
homily  goes  on  to  advance  some  of  the  usual  arguments 
against  astrology,  such  as  that  the  stars  cannot  cause  evil, 
that  the  human  will  is  free,  and  that  a  science  of  individual 
horoscopes  cannot  account  for  all  men  worshiping  idols 
before  Christ  and  abandoning  idolatry  and  other  ancient 
customs  thereafter,  or  for  the  perishing  in  the  deluge  of 
all  men  except  the  family  of  Noah,  or  for  national  customs 
such  as  circumcision  among  the  Jews  and  incest  among 
the  Persians.  Here  we  again  probably  see  the  influence 
of  Bardesanes. 

We  have  already  noted  that  Origen  seems  to  have  been 
the  first  of  the  fathers  to  state  the  number  of  the  Magi  as 

*  Male,  Religious  Art  in  France,  in     the     thirteenth     century.     We 

1913,  p.  208,  was  not  able  to  trace  shall,   however,  find  it  mentioned 

the    legend    that   the    star    of    the  in  the  twelfth  century  by  Abelard, 

Magi  appeared  with  the  face  of  a  who  derived  it  from  this  spurious 

child  beyond  The  Golden  Legend  homily  of  Chrysostom. 
compiled   by   James   of   Voragine 


476 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Number, 
names, 
and  home 
of  the 
Magi. 


three,  whereas  the  homily  just  considered  imphes  that  there 
were  twelve  of  them.  Their  representation  in  art  as  three 
in  number  did  not  become  general  until  the  fourth  century,^ 
while  the  depiction  of  them  as  kings  was  also  a  gradual 
and,  according  to  Kehrer,  later  growth.^  Bouche-Leclercq, 
citing  an  earlier  monograph,^  states  that  the  royalty  of  the 
Magi  was  invented  towards  the  sixth  century  to  show  the 
fulfillment  of  Old  Testament  prophecies,^  and  that  Bede  is 
the  first  who  knows  their  names.  But  Male  says,  "Their 
mysterious  names  are  first  found  in  a  Greek  chronicle  of 
the  beginning  of  the  sixth  century  translated  into  Latin  by 
a  Merovingian  monk,"  and  are  "Bithisarea,  Melichior, 
Gathaspa."  ^  The  provenance  of  the  Magi  was  variously 
stated  by  the  Christian  fathers  :  ®  Arabia  according  to  Justin 
Martyr,  Epiphanius,  and  Tertullian  or  Pseudo-Tertullian; 
Persia  according  to  Clement  of  Alexandria,  Basil,  and  Cyril; 
Persia  or  Chaldea  according  to  Chrysostom  and  Diodorus 
of  Tarsus ;  Chaldea  according  to  Jerome  and  Augustine  and 
the  philosopher  Chalcidius  in  his  commentary  upon  Plato's 
Timaeus.'^  The  homily  which  we  were  just  considering 
gave  the  impression  that  they  came  from  India. 

In  the  middle  ages  the  Magi  appeared  in  liturgical  drama 

as  well  as  in  art.     An  early  instance  is  a  tenth  century 

lectionary  from  Compiegne,  now  preserved  at  Paris, ^  where 

^  They  are  twice  so  represented      creche   {sic!  see  Luke,  II,  12  and 


on  the  elaborately  carved  Chris- 
tian sarcophagus  in  the  museum 
at  Syracuse,  Sicily,  where  also  the 
manger,  ox,  and  ass  are  shown 
(compare  note  4  below). 

^  Hugo  Kehrer,  Die  Heiligen 
drei  Konige  in  Litlcratiir  und 
Kunst,  Leipzig,  1908,  2  vols.  An 
earlier  work  on  the  three  Magi  is 
Inchofer,  Tres  Magi  Evangelici, 
Rome,  1639. 

*J.  C.  Thilo,  Eusebii  Alexan- 
drini  oratio  Hfpl  iLarpovonoiv  (prae- 
missa  de  magis  et  stclla  qtiacs- 
tione)  e  Cod.  Reg.  Par.  primum 
edita,  Progr.  Halae,  1834. 

*  A.  Bouche-Leclercq,  L'As- 
trologie  grecque,  1899,  p.  611,  "La 
royaute  des  Mages  fut  inventee 
(vers    le    Vie    siecle),    comme    la 


16),  le  boeuf  et  I'ane  pour  mpn- 
trer  I'accomplissement  des  prophe- 
ties." 

"  Religious  Art  in  France,  1913, 
p.  214  note,  following,  I  presume, 
Kehrer's  work,  as  he  does  on  p. 
213. 

°  For  detailed  references  see 
M (inter,  Der  Stern  der  Weisen, 
1827,  p.  15;  and  Bouche-Leclercq, 
1S99,  p.  61  r,  where  they  are  stated 
somewhat  differently. 

^  Comm.  in  Platonis  Timaeum, 
II,  vi,  125;  quoted  by  Miinter 
(1827),  pp.  27-8. 

*BN  16819,  fol.  49r.  Corpus 
Christi  134,  early  12th  century, 
fol.  I  v.,  has  a  brief  "Magorum 
trium  qui  Domino  Infanti  aurum 
obtulore  nomina  ct  descriptio." 


XX 


OTHER  CHRISTIAN  DISCUSSION 


A77 


after  homilies  by  various  fathers  there  is  added  in  a  hand 
only  slightly  later  the  liturgical  drama  of  the  adoration 
of  the  Magi.  In  the  later  middle  ages  there  came  into  exist- 
ence the  History  or  Deeds  of  the  Three  Kings  of  Cologne, 
as  the  Magi  came  to  be  called  from  the  supposed  transla- 
tion of  their  relics  to  that  city.  Their  bodies  were  said  to 
have  been  brought  by  the  empress  Helena  from  India  to 
Constantinople,  whence  they  were  transferred  to  Milan, 
and  after  its  destruction  by  Barbarossa,  to  Cologne.  This 
"fabulous  narration,"  as  it  has  well  been  entitled,^  also  has 
much  to  say  of  the  miracles  of  the  apostle  Thomas  in  India 
and  of  Prester  John,  to  whom  we  shall  devote  a  later  chap- 
ter. It  asserts  that  the  three  kings  reached  Jerusalem  on 
the  thirteenth  day  after  Christ's  birth  by  a  miraculously 
rapid  transit  by  day  and  by  night  of  themselves  and  their 
armies  to  the  marvel  of  the  inhabitants  of  the  towns  through 
which  they  passed,  or  rather,  flew.^  After  they  had  re- 
turned home  and  had  successively  migrated  to  Christ  above, 
another  apparition  of  a  star  marked  this  fact.^  The  treatise 
exists  in  many  manuscripts  ■*  and  was  printed  more  than 
once  before  1500. 


'Cotton  Galba  E,  VIII,  isth 
century,  fols.  3-28,  Fabulosa  nar- 
ratio  de  tribus  magis  qui  Chris- 
tum adorarunt  sive  de  tribus 
regibus  Coloniensibus. 

^  Cap.  12  in  the  1478  edition. 

^  Ibid.,  cap.  34. 

*At  Munich  all  the  following 
MSS  are  15th  century:  CLM 
18621,  fol.  135,  Liber  tritim  regum, 
fol.  215,  Legenda  trium  regum  ex- 
cerpta  ex  praccedenti;  19544,  fols. 
314-49,  and  26688,  fols.  157-92, 
Laudcs  et  gesta  trium  regum,  etc.; 
21627,  fols.  212-31,  Historia  de 
tribus  regibus;  23839,  fols.  112-37, 
and  24571,  fols.  50-104,  Gesta 
trium  regumr,'  25073,  fols.  260-83, 
de  nativiiate  domini  et  de  tribus 
regibus.  At  Berlin  MSS  799  and 
800,  both  of  the  iSth  century,  have 
the  Gesta  trium  regum  ascribed  to 
John  of  Hildesheim.  So  Wolfen- 
btittel  3266,  anno  1461.  The 
printed    edition    of     1478    in    46 


chapters  and  about  30  folios  is 
also  ascribed  to  John  of  Hildes- 
heim. We  read  on  the  binding, 
"loannis  Hildeshemensis  Liber  de 
trium  regum  translatione."  The 
Incipit  is :  "Reverendissimo  in 
Christo  patri  ac  domino  domino 
florencio  de  weuelkouen  divina 
providencia  monasteriensis  ec- 
clesie  episcopo  dignissimo."  The 
colophon  is :  "Liber  de  gestis  ac 
trina  beatissimorum  trium  regum 
translacione  .  .  .  per  me  Johan- 
nem  guldenschoff  de  moguncia." 
Some  other  MSS,  also  of  the  15th 
century,  are :  Vatic.  Palat.  Lat. 
859,  de  gestis  et  translationibus 
trium  regum,  and  at  Oxford,  Uni- 
versity College  2>2),  Liber  collectus 
de  gestis  et  translationibus  sanc- 
torum trium  regum  de  Colonia; 
Laud  Misc.,  658,  The  history  of 
the  three  kings  of  Cologne,  in 
forty-one  chapters  with  a  preface. 
It  is  thus  seen  that  the  number  of 


Liturgical 
drama  of 
the   Magi: 
The  Three 
Kings  of 
Cologne. 


478 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


Another 
homily  on 
the  Magi. 


Priscil- 
lianists 
answered. 


Finally  we  may  note  the  contents  of  the  homily  on  the 
Magi  which  immediately  precedes  the  liturgical  drama  con- 
cerning them  in  the  above  mentioned  tenth  century  lection- 
ary,^  The  Magi  are  said  to  have  come  on  the  thirteenth 
day  of  Christ's  nativity.  That  they  came  from  the  Orient 
was  fitting  since  they  sought  one  of  whom  it  had  been 
written,  Ecce  vir  oriens.  It  was  also  fitting  that  Christ's 
coming  should  be  announced  to  shepherds  of  Israel  by  a 
rational  angel,  to  Gentile  Magi  by  an  irrational  star.  This 
star  appeared  neither  in  the  starry  heaven  nor  on  earth  but 
in  the  air ;  it  had  not  existed  before  and  ceased  to  exist  after 
it  had  fulfilled  its  function.  Although  he  has  just  said  that 
the  star  appeared  in  the  air  and  not  in  the  sky,  the  preacher 
now  adds  that  when  a  new  man  was  bom  in  the  world  it 
was  fitting  that  a  new  star  should  appear  in  the  sky.  He 
also,  in  pointing  out  how  all  the  elements  recognized  that 
their  Creator  had  come  into  the  world,  states  that  the  sky 
sent  a  star,  the  sea  allowed  Him  to  walk  upon  it,  the  sun 
was  darkened,  stones  were  broken  and  the  earth  quaked 
when  He  died. 

Since  the  heretics  known  as  Priscillianists  have  adduced 
the  star  at  Christ's  birth  to  prove  that  every  man  is  born 
under  the  fates  of  the  stars,  the  preacher  endeavors  to 
answer  them.  He  holds  that  since  the  star  came  to  where 
Jesus  lay  He  controlled  it  rather  than  vice  versa.  Then 
follow  the  usual  arguments  against  genethlialogy  that  many 
men  born  under  the  sign  Aquarius  are  not  fishermen,  that 
sons  of  serfs  are  born  at  the  same  time  as  princes,  and  the 


chapters  varies.  Coxe's  catalogue 
of  the  Laud  MSS  states  that  the 
Latin  original  was  printed  at 
Cologne  in  quarto  in  1481,  and 
that  it  is  very  different  from  the 
version  printed  by  Wynkyn  de 
Worde.  "The  Story  of  the  Magi," 
in  Bodleian  (Bernard)  2325, 
covers  only  folio  68.  At  Amiens 
is  a  MS  which  the  catalogue  dates 
in  the  14th  century  and  ascribes 
to  John  of  Hildesheim,  and  its 
Incipit  is  practically  that  of  the 
printed  edition :  Amiens  481,  f ols. 


1-58,  "Reverendissimo  in  Christo 
Patri  ac  domino  domino  Floren- 
tino  de  Wovellonem  (sic)  divina 
providencia  Monasteriensis  ec- 
clesie  episcopo  dignissimo.  Cum 
venerandissimorum  triuni  Ma- 
gorum,  ymo  verius  trium  Regum." 
The  work  ends  in  the  MS  with 
the  words,  ".  .  .  summi  Regis 
servant  legem  incole  Colonic. 
Amen.     Explicit  hystoria." 

^  BN    16819,    lOth   century,    fols. 
46r-49r. 


XX  OTHER  CHRISTIAN  DISCUSSION  479 

case  of  Jacob  and  Esau.  The  star  was  merely  a  sign  to  the 
Magi  and  by  its  twinkhng  illuminated  their  minds  to  seek 
the  new-born  babe.  It  seems  scarcely  consistent  that  a  star 
which  the  preacher  has  called  irrational  should  illuminate 
minds. 

The  homily  goes  on  to  say  that  opinions  differ  as  to  Number 
who  the  Magi  were  and  whence  they  came.  Owing  to  ^  the '^^ 
the  prophecy  that  the  kings  of  Tarsus  and  the  isles  offer  Magi  again. 
presents,  the  kings  of  the  Arabs  and  Sheba  bring  gifts,  some 
regard  Tarsus,  Arabia,  and  Sheba  as  the  homes  of  the 
Magi.  Others  call  them  Persians  or  Chaldeans,  since  Chal- 
deans are  skilled  in  astronomy.  Others  say  that  they  were 
descendants  of  Balaam.  At  any  rate  they  were  the  first 
Gentiles  to  seek  Christ  and  they  are  well  said  to  have 
been  three,  symbolizing  faith  in  the  Trinity,  the  three  virtues, 
faith,  hope  and  charity,  the  three  safeguards  against  evil 
thoughts,  words  and  works,  and  the  three  Gentile  contribu- 
tions to  the  Faith  of  physics,  ethics,  and  logic,  or  natural, 
moral,  and  rational  philosophy.  The  preacher  then  indulges 
in  further  allegorical  interpretation  anent  Herod  and  what 
was  typified  by  the  gifts  of  the  Magi.^ 

*  Marco  Polo  (I,  13-14,  ed.  Yule  See    also    F.    W.    K.     Miiller, 

and  Cordier,   1903,  vol.  I,  78-81),  Uigurica,  I,  i,  Die  Anbetung  der 

who  _  located    the    Magi    in    Saba,  Magier,    ein    Christliches    Bruch- 

Persia,  _  recounts    further   legends  stuck ,  Berlin,  1908. 
concerning  them  and  their  gifts. 


CHAPTER  XXI 

CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE  :   BASIL,  EPIPHANIUS, 
AND  THE  PHYSIOLOGUS 

Lactantius  not  a  fair  example — Commentaries  on  the  Biblical  -account 
of  creation — Date  and  delivery  of  Basil's  Hexaemeron — The  Hexaem- 
eron  of  Ambrose — Basil's  medieval  influence — Science  and  religion — 
Scientific  curiosity  of  Basil's  audience — Allusions  to  amusements — Con- 
flicts with  Greek  science — Agreement  with  Greek  science — Qualification 
of  the  Scriptural  account  of  creation — The  four  elements  and  four 
qualities — Enthusiasm  for  nature  as  God's  work — Sin  and  nature — 
Habits  of  animals — Marvels  of  nature — Spontaneous  generation — Lack 
of  scientific  scepticism — Sun  worship  and  astrology — Permanence  of 
species — Final  impression  from  the  Hexaemeron — The  Medicine  Chest 
of  Epiphanius — Gems  in  the  high  priest's  breastplate — Some  other 
gems — The  so-called  Physiologus;  problem  of  its  origin — Does  the  title 
apply  to  any  one  particular  treatise? — And  to  what  sort  of  a  treatise? 
— Medieval  art  shows  almost  no  symbolic  influence  of  the  Physiologus 
— Physiologus  was  more  natural  scientist  than  allegorist. 

Lactantius  The  opposition  of  early  Christian  thought  to  natural 
science  has  been  rather  unduly  exaggerated.  For  instance, 
Lactantius,  one  of  the  least  favorable  to  Greek  philosophy 
and  natural  science  of  the  fathers,  should  hardly  be  cited 
as  typical  of  early  Christian  attitude  in  such  matters.  Nor 
does  his  opposition  impress  one  as  weighty.^  He  ridicules 
the  theory  of  the  Antipodes,^  which  he  perhaps  understands 

*Beazley,     Dawn     of     Modern  here,  too,  I  wonder  if  he  is  not 

Geography,  I,  274,  says,  "Angus-  following  Letronne,  Des  Opinions 

tine     and     Chrysostom     felt     and  Cosmographiques  des  Peres,  with- 

spoke  in  the  same  way,  though  in  out  having  examined  the  citations, 

more     measured     language,     and  Certainly  no  such  attitude  is  found 

nearly  all  early  Christian  writers  in    Basil's    Hexaemeron,    Hom.    3 

who  touched  upon  the  matter  did  and  9  as  the   citation  implies.     I 

so  to  echo  the  voice  of  authorities  have     not     seen      Marinelli,     La 

so   unquestioned."     But   I    cannot  gcographia  e  i  Padri  delta  Chiesa, 

agree     with     this     statement.     He  estratto  dal  Bollettino  della  Societd 

goes  on  to  imply  that  a  majority  geografica  italiana,  anno  1882,  pp. 

of  the  fathers,  like  Cosmas  Indi-  11-15. 
copleustes,  attacked  the  belief   in  "  Diznn.  Instit.,  Ill,  24. 

the   sphericity   of   the   earth ;   but 

480 


CHAP.  XXI  CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE      481 

none  too  well,  asking  if  anyone  can  be  so  inept  as  to  think 
that  there  are  men  whose  feet  are  above  their  heads,  al- 
though he  knows  very  well  that  Greek  science  teaches  that 
all  weights  fall  towards  the  center  of  the  earth,  and  that 
consequently  if  the  feet  are  nearer  the  center  of  the  earth 
that  they  must  be  below  the  head.  He  continues,  however, 
to  insist  that  the  philosophers  are  either  very  stupid,  or  just 
joking,  or  arguing  for  the  sake  of  arguing,  and  he  declares 
that  he  could  show  by  many  arguments  that  the  heaven 
cannot  possibly  be  lower  than  the  earth — which  no  one  has 
asserted  except  himself — if  it  were  not  already  time  to 
close  his  third  book  and  begin  the  fourth.  Apparently 
Lactantius  is  the  one  who  is  arguing  for  the  sake  of  arguing, 
or  just  joking,  or  else  very  stupid,  and  I  fear  it  is  the  last. 
But  other  Christian  fathers  were  less  dense,  and  we  already 
have  heard  the  cultured  pagan  Plutarch  scoff  at  the  notion 
of  a  spherical  earth  and  of  antipodes.  We  may  grant,  how- 
ever, that  the  ecclesiastical  writers  of  the  Roman  Empire 
and  early  medieval  period  normally  treat  of  spiritual  rather 
than  material  themes  and  discuss  them  in  a  religious  rather 
than  a  scientific  manner. 

But  in  the  commentaries  upon  the  books  of  the  Bible   Commen- 
which  the  fathers  multiplied  so  voluminously  it  was  neces-  the  Bibli- 
sary  for  them,  if  they  began  their  labors  with  Genesis,  to   cal  account 
deal  at  the  very  start  in  the  first  verses  of  the  first  book  of   tion. 
the  Bible  with  an  explanation  of  nature  which  at  several 
points  was  in  disagreement  with  the  accepted  theories  of 
Greek  philosophy  and  ancient  science.     Such  comment  upon 
the  opening  verses  of  Genesis  sometimes  developed  into  a 
separate  treatise  called  Hexaemeron  from  the  works  of  the 
six  days  of  creation  which  it  discussed.     Of  the  various 
treatises  of  this  type  the  Hexaemeron  of  Basil  ^  seems  to 
have  been  both  the  best  ^  and  the  most  influential,  and  will  be 
considered  by  us  as  an  example  of  Christian  attitude  towards 

*Migne,  PG,  vol.  29;  PN,  vol.  8.      work  as  "a  la  fois  plus  sobre,  plus 
"Duhem    (1914)    II,   394,   how-      concis,  et  plus  philosophique.  .  .  ." 
ever,  prefers  Gregory  of   Nyssa's 


482 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE        chap. 


Date  and 

delivery  of 
Basil's 
Hexaem- 
eron. 


The 

Hexacm- 
eron  of 
Ambrose. 


the  natural  science  and,  to  some  extent,  the  superstition  of 
the  ancient  world. 

Basil  died  on  the  first  day  of  January,  379  A.  D.,  and 
was  born  about  329.  When  or  where  the  nine  homilies 
which  compose  his  Hexaemeron  were  preached  is  not  known, 
but  from  an  allusion  to  his  bodily  infirmity  in  the  seventh 
homily  and  his  forgetfulness  the  next  day  in  Homily  VIII 
we  might  infer  that  it  was  late  in  life.  To  all  appearances 
these  sermons  were  taken  down  and  have  reached  us  just 
as  they  were  delivered  to  the  people,  to  whose  daily  life 
Basil  frequently  adverts.  The  sermons  were  delivered  early 
in  the  morning  before  the  artisans  in  the  audience  went  to 
their  work  and  again  at  the  close  of  the  day  and  before 
the  evening  meal,  since  Basil  sometimes  speaks  of  the  ap- 
proach of  darkness  surprising  him  and  of  its  consequently 
being  time  to  stop.^  One  of  the  surest  indications  either 
that  the  sermons  were  delivered  extemporaneously,  or  that 
Basil  was  repeating  with  variations  to  suit  the  occasion 
and  present  audience  sermons  which  he  had  delivered  so 
often  as  to  have  practically  memorized,  occurs  in  the 
eighth  homily  where  he  starts  to  discuss  land  animals, 
forgetting  that  the  last  day  he  did  not  get  to  birds,  but  is 
presently  brought  to  a  realization  of  his  omission  by  the 
actions  of  his  audience  and,  after  a  pause  and  an  apology, 
makes  a  fresh  start  upon  birds.  The  Hexaemeron  was 
highly  praised  by  Basil's  contemporaries  and  was  regarded 
as  the  best  of  his  works  by  later  Byzantine  literary  collectors 
and  critics. 

Basil's  work,  however,  was  not  the  first  of  its  kind,  as 
Hippolytus  and  Origen,  at  least,  are  known  to  have  earlier 
composed  similar  treatises,  and  still  earlier  in  the  treatise 


*  Homily  I  was  delivered  in  the 
morning,  II  in  the  evening;  III 
was  in  the  morning  and  speaks  of 
a  coming  evening  address.  At  the 
close  of  Homily  VII  Basil  urges 
his  hearers  to  talk  over  at  their 
evening  meal  what  they  have 
heard  this  morning  and  this  eve- 


ning. If  we  regard  Homily  VI 
as  the  morning  address  referred 
to,  we  shall  have  Homily  V  left  to 
cover  an  entire  day.  Homily  VI, 
however,  is  the  longest  of  the 
nine.  In  any  case  Homily  VIII  is 
clearly  preached  in  the  morning, 
and  IX  at  evening. 


XXI         CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE         483 

of  Theophilus  To  Aiitolyciis  we  find  a  few  chapters  ^  de- 
voted to  the  six  days  of  creation.  In  one  of  his  letters 
Jerome  states  that  "Ambrose  recently  so  compiled  the 
Hexaemeron  of  Origen  that  he  rather  followed  the  views 
of  Hippolytus  and  Basil."  ^  This  Latin  work  of  Ambrose 
is  extant  and  seems  to  me  to  follow  Basil  very  closely.  At 
times  the  order  of  presentation  is  slightly  varied  and  the 
work  of  Ambrose  is  longer,  but  this  is  due  to  its  more 
verbose  rhetoric  and  greater  indulgence  in  Biblical  quotation, 
and  not  to  the  introduction  of  new  ideas.  The  Benedictine 
editors  of  Ambrose  admit  that  he  has  taken  a  great  deal 
from  Basil  but  deny  that  he  has  servilely  imitated  him.^ 
But  a  striking  instance  of  such  servile  imitation  is  seen  in 
Ambrose's  duplicating  even  Basil's  mistake  in  omitting  to 
discuss  birds  and  then  apologizing  for  it,  reminding  one  of 
the  Chinese  workman  who  made  all  the  new  dinner  plates 
with  a  crack  and  a  toothpick  stuck  in  it,  like  the  old  broken 
plate  which  he  had  been  given  as  a  model.  It  is  true  that 
Ambrose  does  not  first  discuss  land  animals  for  a  page  as 
Basil  did,  but  makes  his  apology  more  immediately.  The 
opening  words  of  the  eighth  sermon  in  the  twelfth  chapter 
of  his  fifth  book  are,  "And  after  he  had  remained  silent 
for  a  moment,  again  resuming  his  discourse,  he  said  .  .  ." 
Then  comes  his  apology,  expressed  in  different  terms  from 
Basil's  and  to  the  effect  that  in  his  previous  discourse  upon 
fishes  he  became  so  immersed  in  the  depths  of  the  sea  as  to 
forget  all  about  birds.  Thus  the  incident  which  in  Basil 
had  every  appearance  of  a  natural  mistake,  in  Ambrose  has 
all  the  earmarks  of  an  affected  imitation.  It  is  barely  possi- 
ble, however,  that  Origen  made  the  original  mistake  and 
that  Basil  and  Ambrose  have  both  imitated  him  in  it.  On 
the  other  hand,  we  are  told  that  the  Hexaemerons  of  Origen 

*  Bk.  II,  caps.  10-17.  ment    of    the    work    of    creation, 

*  Epistola  65,  ad  Pamniachium.  continues  to  comment  on  the  text 
Augustine's  De  Gcncsi  ad  litteram,  up  to  Adam's  expulsion  from 
which   Cassiodorus    (Institutes,   I,  Paradise. 

i)    esteemed   above  the   commen-  ^  Migne,  PL,  14,  131-2.    The  most 

taries  of  Basil  and  Ambrose  upon  recent  edition  of  the  Hexaemeron 

Genesis,    is    a    som.ewhat    similar  of    Ambrose    is    by    C.    Schenkl. 

work,   but,   after  a  briefer  treat-  Vienna,  1896. 


484 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Basil's 

medieval 

influence. 


and  Basil  differed  fundamentally  in  this  respect,  that  Origen 
indulged  to  a  great  extent  in  allegorical  interpretation  of  the 
Mosaic  account  of  creation/  while  Basil  declares  that  he 
"takes  all  in  the  literal  sense,"  is  "not  ashamed  of  the 
Gospel,"  and  "admits  the  common  sense  of  the  Scriptures."  ^ 
At  any  rate,  Basil's  Hexaemeron  seems  to  have  sup- 
planted all  such  previous  treatises  in  Greek,  while  its  west- 
em  influence  is  shown  not  only  by  Ambrose's  imitation  of 
it  so  soon  after  its  production,  but  by  Latin  translations  of 
it  by  Eustathius  Afer  in  the  fifth,  and  perhaps  by  Dionysius 
Exiguus  in  the  sixth  century.  Medieval  manuscripts  of  it 
are  fairly  numerous  and  sometimes  of  early  date,^  and 
include  an  Anglo-Saxon  epitome  ascribed  to  Aelfric  in  the 
Bodleian  Library,  Bartholomew  of  England  *  in  the  thir- 
teenth century  quotes  "Rabanus  who  uses  the  words  of 
Basil  in  the  Hexaemeron"  for  a  description  of  the  empyrean 
heaven  which  I  have  been  unable  to  find  in  the  works  of 


*Fialon,  £tude  sur  St.  Basile, 
1869,  p.  296. 

""  Homily  IX. 

*  For  example,  in  the  catalogue, 
published  in  1744,  of  MSS  in  the 
then  Royal  Library  at  Paris  there 
are  listed  five  copies  of  Eustathius' 
Latin  translation,  dating  from  the 
ninth  to  the  fourteenth  century — 
2200,  4;  1701,  i;  1702,  i;  1787A, 
2 ;  2633,  I ;  and  fifteen  copies  of 
the  Hexaemeron  of  Ambrose — 
1718;  1702,  2;  1719  to  1727  in- 
clusive ;  2387,  4 ;  2637  and  2638. 

I  have  not  noted  what  MSS  of 
the  Hexaemerons  of  Basil  and 
Ambrose  are  found  in  the  British 
Museum  and  Bodleian  libraries. 
Some  other  medieval  copies  of 
Basil's  in  Latin  translation  are : 
BN  12134,  9th  century  Lombard 
hand;  Vendome  122,  nth  cen- 
tury, fols.  I  v-60;  Soissons  121, 
I2th  century,  fol.  97,  Eustathius' 
prologue  and  a  part  of  his  trans- 
lation;  Grenoble  258,  12th  cen- 
tury, fols.  1-45,  "Eustathii  trans- 
latio.  .  .  ." 

The  Hexaemeron  of  Ambrose, 
since  written   originally  in  Latin, 


is  naturally  found  oftener.  The 
oldest  MS  is  said  to  be  CU 
Corpus  Christi  193,  large  Lom- 
bard script  of  the  8th  century 
which  closely  resembles  BN  3836. 
Other  MSS  are:  BN  11624,  nth 
century;  BN  12135,  9th  century; 
BN  12136,  i2-i3th  century;  BN 
13336,  nth  century;  BN  14847, 
I2th  century,  fol.  163;  BN  nouv. 
acq.  490,  i2th  century;  Vatican 
269-273  inclusive,  io-i5th  centu- 
ries ;  Alenqon  10,  12th  century ; 
Vendome  129,  12th  century,  fols. 
48-126;  Semur,  10,  12th  century; 
Chartres  63,  10- nth  century,  fols. 
3-46;  Orleans  35,  nth  century; 
Orleans  192,  7th  century,  part  of 
the  first  two  books  only ;  Amiens 
fonds  Lescalopier  30,  12th  cen- 
tury; le  Mans  15,  nth  century; 
Brussels  1782,  loth  century;  CLM 
2549,  I2th  century;  CLM  3728, 
loth  century;  CLM  6258,  loth 
century;  CLM  13079,  12th  cen- 
tury ;  CLM  14399,  I2th  century ; 
Novara  40,  12th  century;  and 
many  other  MSS  of  later  date  in 
these  and  other  libraries. 

*  De  proprietatibus  rerum,  VIII, 
4- 


XXI 


CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE 


485 


either  Rabanus  or  Basil.  Bede,  in  a  similar,  though  much 
abbreviated,  work  of  his  own,  states  that  while  many  have 
said  many  things  concerning  the  beginning  of  the  Book  of 
Genesis,  the  chief  authorities,  so  far  as  he  has  been  able 
to  discover,  are  Basil  of  Caesarea,  whom  Eustathius  trans- 
lated from  Greek  into  Latin,  Ambrose  of  Milan,  and  Augus- 
tine, bishop  of  Hippo.  These  works,  however,  were  so  long 
and  expensive  that  only  the  rich  could  afford  to  purchase 
them  and  so  profound  that  only  the  learned  could  read  and 
understand  them.  Bede  had  accordingly  been  requested  to 
compose  a  brief  rendition  of  them,  which  he  does  partly 
in  his  own  words,  partly  in  theirs.^ 

The  general  tenor  of  Basil's  treatise  may  be  described  Science 
as  follows.  He  accepts  the  literal  sense  of  the  first  chapter  religion. 
of  Genesis  as  a  correct  account  of  the  universe,  and,  when 
he  finds  Greek  philosophy  and  science  in  disagreement  with 
the  Biblical  narrative,  inveighs  against  the  futilities  and 
follies  and  conflicting  theories  and  excessive  elaborations 
of  the  philosophers.  On  such  occasions  the  simple  state- 
ments of  Scripture  are  sufficient  for  him.  "Upon  the  essence 
of  the  heavens  we  are  contented  with  what  Isaiah  says. 
...  In  the  same  way,  as  concerns  the  earth,  let  us  resolve 
not  to  torment  ourselves  by  trying  to  find  out  its  essence. 
...  At  all  events  let  us  prefer  the  simplicity  of  faith  to 
the  demonstrations  of  reason."  ^  These  three  quotations 
illustrate  his  attitude  at  such  times.  But  at  all  other  times 
he  is  apt  to  follow  Greek  science  rather  implicitly,  accepting 
without  question  its  hypothesis  of  four  elements  and  four 
qualities,  and  taking  all  his  details  about  birds,  beasts,  and 
fish  from  the  same  source. 

Moreover,  while  Basil  may  affirm  that  the  edification    Scientific 

of  the  church  is  his  sole  aim  and  interest,  it  is  evident  that    '^"''iP^'tX 

1    ,  .      ,  .  of  Basil  3 

his  audience  are  possessed  by  a  lively  scientific  curiosity,    audience. 


*  Bede,  Hexaemeron,  sive  libri 
quatuor  in  principium  Genesis 
usque  ad  nativitatem  Isaac  et 
electionem  Ismaelis,  in  Migne,  PL, 
Qi,     9-100.     Bede     originally     in- 


tended to  carry  his  work  only  to 
the     expulsion     of     Adam     from 
Paradise,  but  subsequently  added 
three  more  books. 
'Homilies  I,  VIII,  and  X. 


486 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chaf. 


and  that  they  wish  to  hear  a  great  deal  more  about  natural 
phenomena  than  Isaiah  or  any  other  Biblical  author  has  to 
offer  them.  "What  trouble  you  have  given  me  in  my  pre- 
vious discourses,"  exclaims  Basil  in  his  fourth  homily,  "by 
asking  me  why  the  earth  was  invisible,  why  all  bodies  are 
naturally  endued  with  color,  and  why  all  color  comes  under 
the  sense  of  sight?  And  perhaps  my  reason  did  not  appear 
sufficient  to  you.  .  .  ,  Perhaps  you  will  ask  me  new  ques- 
tions." Basil  gratifies  this  curiosity  concerning  the  world 
of  nature  with  many  details  not  mentioned  in  the  Bible 
but  drawn  from  such  works  as  Aristotle's  Meteorology  and 
History  of  Animals.  This  scientific  curiosity  displayed  by 
Basil's  hearers  is  the  more  interesting  in  that  artisans  who 
had  to  labor  for  their  daily  bread  appear  to  have  made  up  a 
large  element  in  his  audience.-^  It  is  perhaps  on  their  ac- 
count that  Basil  often  speaks  of  God  as  the  supreme  artisan 
or  artificer  or  artist,^  or  calls  their  attention  to  "the  vast 
and  varied  workshop  of  divine  creation,"  ^  and  makes  other 
flattering  allusions  to  arts  which  support  life  or  produce 
enduring  work,  and  to  waterways  and  sea  trade.*  He  also 
seems  to  have  a  sincere  appreciation  of  the  arts  and  admira- 
tion of  beauty,  which  he  twice  defines.^ 

At  the  risk  of  digression,  it  is  perhaps  worth  noting 
further  that  Basil's  hearers  seem  to  have  been  very  familiar 
with,  not  to  say  fond  of,  the  amusements  common  in  the 
cities  of  the  Roman  Empire.  Twice  he  opens  his  sermons 
with  allusions  to  the  athletes  of  the  circus  and  actors  of 
the  theater,®  apparently  as  the  surest  way  of  quickly  catch- 
ing the  attention  of  his  audience,  while  on  a  third  occasion, 
in  concluding  his  morning  address  on  what  appears  to  have 
been  a  holiday,  he  remarks  that  if  he  had  dismissed  them 
earlier,  some  would  have  spent  the  rest  of  the  day  gambling 
with  dice,  and  that  "the  longer  I  keep  you,  the  longer  you 
are  out  of  the  way  of  mischief."  ^     He  also  alludes  to  the 


*  Homily  III,  i  and  lO. 

M,  7;  III,  5  and  lo. 

'IV,  I. 

M,  7;   HI,  5;  IV,  3,  4,  and  7; 


VI,  9;  VII,  6. 
*II,  7;   III,  10. 
•IV.  i;  VI,  I. 
'VIII,  8. 


XXI 


CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE 


487 


spinning  of  tops  and  to  what  was  apparently  the  game  of 
push-ball.-^ 

Taking  up  the  contents  of  the  Hexaemeron  more  in 
detail,  we  may  first  note  those  points  upon  which  Basil  sup- 
ports the  statements  of  the  Bible  against  Greek  science  and 
philosophy.  He  of  course  insists  that  the  universe  was 
created  by  God  and  is  not  co-existent,  much  less  identical, 
with  Him.-  He  also  denies  that  the  form  of  the  world 
alone  is  due  to  God  and  that  matter  is  of  separate  origin.^ 
Nor  will  he  accept  the  arguments  of  the  philosophers  who 
"would  rather  lose  their  tongues"  than  admit  that  there  is 
more  than  one  heaven.  Basil  is  ready  to  believe  not  merely 
in  a  second,  but  a  third  heaven,  such  as  the  apostle  Paul 
speaks  of  being  rapt  to.  He  regards  a  plurality  of  heavens 
as  no  more  difficult  to  credit  than  the  seven  concentric 
spheres  of  the  planets,  and  as  much  more  probable  than  the 
philosophic  theory  of  the  music  of  the  spheres  which  he 
decries  as  "ingenious  frivolity,  the  untruth  of  which  is  evi- 
dent from  the  first  word."  ■*  He  also  defends  the  statement 
of  Scripture  that  there  are  waters  above  the  firmament,  not 
only  against  the  doctrines  of  ancient  astronomy,^  but  also 
against  "certain  writers  in  the  church,"  among  whom  he 
probably  has  Origen  in  mind,  who  interpret  the  passage 
figuratively  and  assert  that  the  waters  stand  for  "spiritual 
and  incorporeal  powers,"  those  above  the  firmament  repre- 
senting good  angels  and  those  below  the  firmament  standing 
for  evil  demons.  "Let  us  reject  these  theories  as  we  would 
the  interpretations  of  dreams  and  old-wives'  tales."  ^ 

In  connection  with  Basil's  defense  of  the  plurality  of 
the  heavens  it  may  be  noted  that  R.  H.  Charles  presents 
evidence  to  show  "that  speculations  or  definitely  formulated 
views  on  the  plurality  of  the  heavens  were  rife  in  the  very 
cradle  of  Christendom  and  throughout  its  entire  develop- 
ment," and  that  "the  prevailing  view  was  that  of  the  seven- 


Conflicts 

with 

Greek 

science. 


*  Homily  V,  10;  IX,  2 

*ni,  3. 

\l  ^■ 

"  II,  4,  et  sea. 

'  II.  I. 

*  III,  9. 

488 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Agree- 
ment with 
Greek 


Qualifica- 
tion of  the 
Scriptural 
account  of 
creation. 


fold  division  of  the  heavens,"  ^  He  fails,  however,  to  dis- 
criminate between  the  doctrine  of  Greek  philosophy  that 
the  universe  was  one,  although  the  circles  of  the  planets  are 
seven,  and  the  plurality  of  the  heavens,  which  Basil  insists 
that  the  philosophers  deny;  and  very  probably  the  Jewish 
and  early  Christian  notions  of  successive  heavens  full  of 
angels  and  spirits  developed  from  the  spheres  of  the  planets. 
Among  the  various  early  heresies  described  by  the  fathers 
are  also  found,  of  course,  many  allusions  to  these  seven 
spheres  or  heavens.  The  disciples  of  Valentinus,  for  ex- 
ample, according  to  Irenaeus  and  Epiphanius,  "affirm  that 
these  seven  heavens  are  intelligent  and  speak  of  them  as 
angels  .  .  .  and  declare  that  Paradise,  situated  above  the 
third  heaven,  is  a  powerful  angel."  ^ 

On  the  other  hand,  we  may  note  some  points  where 
Basil  is  in  accord  with  Greek  science.  He  warns  his  hearers 
not  to  "be  surprised  that  the  world  never  falls;  it  occupies 
the  center  of  the  universe,  its  natural  place."  ^  He  advances 
numerous  proofs  of  the  immense  size  of  the  sun  and  moon.* 
He  accepts  the  hypothesis  of  four  elements  but  abstains 
from  passing  judgment  upon  the  question  of  a  fifth  ele- 
ment of  which  the  heavens  and  celestial  bodies  may  be 
composed.^  He  thinks  that  "it  needs  not  the  space  of  a 
moment  for  light  to  pass  through"  the  ether.^ 

Moreover,  Basil  finds  it  necessary  to  qualify  some  of 
the  statements  in  the  first  chapter  of  Genesis.  He  inter- 
prets the  command,  "Let  the  waters  under  the  heaven  be 
gathered  together  unto  one  place,"  to  apply  only  to  the  sea 
or  ocean,  which  he  contends  is  one  body  of  water,  and  not 
to  pools  and  lakes,'^  recognizing  that  otherwise  "our  ex- 
planation of  the  creation  of  the  world  may  appear  contrary 
to  experience,  because  it  is  evident  that  all  the  waters  did 
not  flow  together  in  one  place."     In  this   connection  he 

*  Charles,     The     Book     of     the  '  Homily  I,  lO. 

Secrets    of    Enoch,    Introduction,  *  VI,  9-1 1. 

pp.  xxxi,  xxxix.  *  I,   II. 

'  Irenaeus,  I,  5  ;  Epiphanius,  ed.  '  II,  7. 

Petavius  t86AB.  'IV,  2-4. 


XXI 


CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE 


489 


states  that  "although  some  authorities  think  that  the 
Hyrcanian  and  Caspian  Seas  are  enclosed  in  their  own 
boundaries,  if  we  are  to  believe  the  geographers,  they  com- 
municate with  each  other  and  together  discharge  them- 
selves into  the  Great  Sea."  He  speaks  of  "the  vast  ocean, 
so  dreaded  by  navigators,  which  surrounds  the  isle  of  Brit- 
ain and  western  Spain."  ^  Later  he  contends  that  "sea  water 
is  the  source  of  all  the  moisture  of  the  earth."  ^  He  has 
also  to  meet  the  following  objection  made  to  the  eleventh 
and  twelfth  verses  of  the  first  chapter  of  Genesis:  "How 
then,  they  say,  can  Scripture  describe  all  the  plants  of  the 
earth  as  seed-bearing,  when  the  reed,  couch-grass,  mint, 
crocus,  garlic,  and  the  flowering  rush  and  countless  other 
species  produce  no  seed?  To  this  we  reply  that  many 
vegetables  have  their  seminal  virtue  in  the  lower  part  and 
in  the  roots."  ^ 

Basil  regards  the  words  of  Genesis,  "God  called  the 
dry  land  earth,"  as  a  recognition  of  the  fact  that  drought 
is  the  primal  property  of  earth,  as  humidity  is  of  air ;  cold, 
of  water;  and  heat,  of  fire.  He  adds,  however,  that  "our 
eyes  and  senses  can  find  nothing  which  is  completely  singu- 
lar, simple,  and  pure.  Earth  is  at  the  same  time  dry  and 
cold;  water,  cold  and  moist;  air,  moist  and  warm;  fire, 
warm  and  dry."  ^  Indeed,  as  he  has  already  stated  in  the 
previous  homily,  the  mixture  of  elements  in  actual  objects 
is  even  more  intricate  than  this  last  sentence  might  seem 
to  indicate.  Every  element  is  in  every  other,  and  we  not 
only  do  not  perceive  with  our  senses  any  pure  elements  but 
not  even  any  compounds  of  two  elements  only.^ 

Basil  is  alive  to  the  absorbing  interest  of  the  world  of 
nature  and  to  the  marvelous  intricacies  of  natural  science. 
He  tells  his  hearers  that  as  "anyone  not  knowing  a  town  is 
taken  by  the  hand  and  led  through  it,"  so  he  will  guide  them 
"through  the  mysterious  marvels  of  this  great  city  of  the 
universe."  ^  As  he  had  said  in  the  preceding  homily,  "A 
'Homily  IV,  4.  ■•  I V,  5. 


The  four 
elements 
and  four 
qualities. 


Enthusi- 
asm for 
nature  as 
God's 
work. 


IV,  6. 

V.  2. 


Ill,  4. 
VI,  I. 


490 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


single  plant,  a  blade  of  grass  is  sufficient  to  occupy  all  your 
intelligence  in  the  contemplation  of  the  skill  which  pro- 
duced it."  ^  He  sees  "great  wisdom  in  small  things."  ^ 
Thus  by  the  argument  from  design  he  is  apt  to  work  back 
from  nature  to  the  Creator,  so  that  his  enthusiasm  cannot 
be  regarded  as  purely  scientific.  Going  a  step  farther  than 
Galen's  argument  from  design,  he  contends  that  "not  a 
single  thing  has  been  created  without  reason;  not  a  single 
thing  is  useless."  ^ 

Basil  also  cherishes  the  notion,  which  we  have  already 
found  both  in  pagan  and  Christian  writers,  that  human  sin 
leaves  its  stain  or  has  its  effect  upon  nature.  The  rose  was 
without  thorns  before  the  fall  of  man,  and  their  addition  to 
its  beauty  serves  to  remind  us  that  "sorrow  is  very  near 
to  pleasure."  * 

Basil  discusses  the  habits  of  animals  largely  in  order 
to  draw  moral  lessons  from  them  for  human  beings  and  he 
has  several  passages  in  the  style  supposed  to  be  charac- 
teristic of  the  Physiologus.  But  he  also  refers  in  a  num- 
ber of  places  to  the  ability  of  animals  to  find  remedies  with 
which  to  cure  themselves  of  ailments  and  injuries,  or  to 
their  power  of  divining  the  future.  The  sea-urchin  fore- 
tells storms;  sheep  and  goats  discern  danger  by  instinct 
alone.  The  starling  eats  hemlock  and  digests  it  "before  its 
chill  can  attack  the  vital  parts";  and  the  quail  is  able  to 
feed  on  hellebore.  The  wounded  bear  nurses  himself,  filling 
his  wounds  with  mullein,  an  astringent  plant;  "the  fox 
heals  his  wounds  with  droppings  from  the  pine  tree" ;  the 
tortoise  counteracts  the  venom  of  the  vipers  it  has  eaten 
by  means  of  the  herb  marjoram;  and  "the  serpent  heals  sore 
eyes  by  eating  fennel."  ^ 

Indeed,  far  from  being  led  by  his  acquaintance  with 
Greek  science  into  doubting  the  marvelous,  Basil  finds  "in 
nature  a  thousand  reasons  for  believing  in  the  marvelous."  ^ 
He  is  ready  to  ascribe  astounding  powers  to  animals,  and 

*  Homily  V,  3.  *V,  6. 

"V,  9.  "vii,  s;ix.  3. 

'V.  4.  •  VIII,  6. 


XXI 


CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE 


491 


Spon- 
taneous 
genera- 
tion. 


believes,  like  Pliny,  that  "the  greatest  vessels,  sailing  with 
full  sails,  are  easily  stopped  by  a  tiny  fish."  ^  He  tells  us 
that  nature  endowed  the  lion  with  such  loud  and  forceful 
vocal  organs  "that  often  much  swifter  animals  are  caught 
by  his  roaring  alone."  ^  He  also  repeats  in  charming  style 
the  familiar  story  of  the  halcyon  days.  The  halcyon  lays 
its  eggs  along  the  shore  in  mid-winter  when  violent  winds 
dash  the  waves  against  the  land.  Yet  winds  are  hushed 
and  waves  are  calm  during  the  seven  days  that  the  halcyon 
sits,  and  then,  after  its  young  are  hatched  and  in  need  of 
food,  "God  in  his  munificence  grants  another  seven  days 
to  this  tiny  animal.  All  sailors  know  this  and  call  these  days 
halcyon  days."  ^ 

Like  most  ancient  scientists,  Basil  believes  that  some  ani- 
mals are  spontaneously  generated.  "Many  birds  have  no 
need  of  union  with  males  to  conceive,"  a  circumstance  which 
should  make  it  easy  for  us  to  believe  in  the  Virgin  birth  of 
Christ.^  Grasshoppers  and  other  nameless  insects  and  some- 
times frogs  and  mice  are  "born  from  the  earth  itself,"  and 
"mud  alone  produces  eels,"  ^  a  theory  not  much  more  amaz- 
ing than  the  assertion  of  modern  biologists  that  eels  spawn 
only  in  the  Mediterranean  Sea.  Basil  states  that  "in  the 
environs  of  Thebes  in  Egypt  after  abundant  rain  in  hot 
weather  the  country  is  covered  with  field  mice,"  but  with- 
out noting  that  abundant  rain  in  upper  Egypt  in  hot  weather 
would  itself  be  in  the  nature  of  a  miracle. 

Basil  is  less  sceptical  than  Apollonius  of  Tyana  in 
regard  to  the  birth  of  lions  and  of  vipers,  repeating  iin- 
questioningly  the  statement  that  the  viper  gnaws  its  way  ticism 
out  of  its  mother's  womb,  and  that  the  lioness  bears  only  one 
whelp  because  it  tears  her  with  its  claws. ^  Of  purely  scien- 
tific scepticism  there  is,  indeed,  little  in  the  Hexaemeron. 
Basil  does,  however,  question  one  of  the  powers  ascribed 
to  magicians,  and  this  is  his  only  mention  of  the  magic 

*  Homily  VII,  6. 
'IX,  3. 

*VIII,    5.      See   also   Aristotle, 
History  of  Animals,  V,  8. 


Lack  of 
scientific 
scep- 


*  Homily  VIII,  6. 
"IX,  2. 
IX,  s. 


492  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

art.  Discussing  the  immense  size  of  the  moon  and  its 
great  influence  upon  terrestrial  nature,  he  declares  ridiculous 
the  old-wives'  tales  which  have  been  circulated  everywhere 
that  magic  incantations  "can  remove  the  moon  from  its 
place  and  make  it  descend  to  the  earth."  ^ 

Sun  worship  still  existed  in  Basil's  time  and  he  hails 
the  fact  that  the  sun  was  not  created  until  the  fourth  day, 
after  both  light  and  vegetation  were  in  existence,  as  a 
severe  blow  to  those  who  reverence  the  sun  as  the  source 
of  life.^  However,  he  does  "not  pretend  to  be  able  to 
separate  light  from  the  body  of  the  sun."  ^  Theophilus  in 
his  earlier  discussion  of  creation  had  stated,  perhaps  copy- 
ing Philo  Judaeus,  that  the  luminaries  were  not  created  until 
the  fourth  day,  "because  God,  who  possesses  foreknowledge, 
knew  the  follies  of  the  vain  philosophers,  that  they  were 
going  to  say,  that  the  things  which  grow  on  earth  are  pro- 
duced from  the  heavenly  bodies" — which  is,  indeed,  a  funda- 
mental hyopthesis  of  astrology — "so  as  to  exclude  God.  In 
order,  therefore,  that  the  truth  might  be  obvious,  the  plants 
and  seeds  were  produced  prior  to  the  heavenly  bodies,  for 
what  is  posterior  cannot  produce  that  which  is  prior."  ^ 
Basil  does  not  make  this  point  against  the  rule  of  inferior 
creation  by  the  heavenly  bodies,  but  in  a  succeeding  homily 
he  feels  it  necessary  to  devote  several  paragraphs  ^  to  refuta- 
tion of  the  "vain  science"  of  casting  nativities,  which  some 
persons  have  justified  by  the  words  of  God  concerning  sun, 
moon,  and  stars  in  the  first  chapter  of  Genesis,  "And  let 
them  be  for  signs.''  Basil  questions  if  it  be  possible  to 
determine  the  exact  instant  of  birth,  declares  that  to  at- 
tribute to  the  constellations  and  signs  of  the  zodiac  the 
characteristics  of  animals  is  to  subject  them  to  external  in- 
fluences, and  defends  human  free  will  in  much  the  usual 
fashion.  He  is  ready,  however,  to  grant  that  "the  variations 
of  the  moon  do  not  take  place  without  exerting  great  influ- 
ence upon  the  organization  of  animals  and  of  all  living 

'Homily  VI,  li.  *  Ad  Autolvcum,  II,   15. 

»V,  I,  ^Homily  VI,  S-7. 

•VI,  3. 


XXI         CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE         493 


things,"  and  that  the  moon  makes  "all  nature  participate 
in  her  changes."  ^ 

Basil's  utterances  concerning  the  world  of  nature  are 
not  always  consistent.  In  describing  the  creation  of  vege- 
tation he  asserts  that  species  are  unchanging,  affirming  that 
"all  which  sprang  from  the  earth  in  the  first  bringing  forth 
is  kept  the  same  to  our  time,  thanks  to  the  constant  repro- 
duction of  kind."  ^  Yet  a  few  paragraphs  later  we  find 
him  saying,  "It  has  been  observed  that  pines,  cut  down  or 
even  submitted  to  the  action  of  fire,  are  changed  into  a 
forest  of  oaks."  ^  Nevertheless  in  the  last  homily  he  again 
asserts  that  "nature,  once  put  in  motion  by  divine  command, 
.  .  .  keeps  up  the  succession  of  kinds  through  resemblance 
to  the  last.  Nature  always  makes  a  horse  succeed  to  a  horse, 
a  lion  to  a  lion,  an  eagle  to  an  eagle,  and  preserving  each 
animal  by  these  uninterrupted  successions  she  transmits  it 
to  the  end  of  all  things.  Animals  do  not  see  their  peculiari- 
ties destroyed  or  effaced  by  any  length  of  time;  their  nature, 
as  though  it  had  just  been  constituted,  follows  the  course 
of  ages  forever  young."  ■* 

Concerning  Basil  in  conclusion  we  may  say  that  while 
he  can  scarcely  be  called  much  of  a  scientist,  he  is  a  pretty 
good  scientist  for  a  preacher.  His  knowledge  of,  and 
errors  concerning,  the  world  of  nature  will  probably  com- 
pare quite  as  well  with  the  science  of  his  day  as  those  of 
most  modern  sermons  will  with  the  science  of  our  days.  His 
occasional  flings  at  Greek  philosophy  are  probably  not  to 
be  taken  too  seriously.     But  what  interests  us  rather  more 


'  Homily  VI,  lo. 

""V,  2. 

'  V,  7.  But  perhaps  he  simply 
means  that  oaks  will  grow  where 
pines  used  to. 

Tertullian,  De  pallio,  cap.  2, 
dwelling  on  the  law  of  change, 
speaks  of  the  washing  down 
of  soil  from  mountains,  the 
alluvial  formation  by  rivers,  and 
of  sea-shells  on  mountain  tops  as 
a  proof  that  the  whole  earth  was 
once  covered  by  water.  He  seems 
to  have  in  mind  a  gradual  process 


of  geological  evolution  rather  than 
Noah's  flood,  and  Sir  James 
Frazer  states  that  Isidore  of 
Seville  is  the  first  he  knows  of 
the  many  writers  who  have  ap- 
pealed "to  fossil  shells  imbedded 
in  remote  mountains  as  witnesses 
to  the  truth  of  the  Noachian  tra- 
dition,"— Origines,  XIII,  22,  cited 
by  J.  G.  Frazer,  Folk-Lore  in  the 
Old  Testament  (1918),  I,  159,  who 
cites  the  passage  in  Tertullian  at 

PP-  338-9- 
'  Homily  IX,  2. 


Perma- 
nence of 
species. 


Final  im- 
pression 
from  the 
Hexaent- 
eron. 


494 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap. 


The  Medi- 
cine Chest 
of  Epipha- 
nius. 


than  Basil's  attitude  is  that  of  his  audience,  curious  con- 
cerning nature.  Just  as  it  is  evident  that  many  of  them 
go  to  theaters  and  circuses,  or  play  with  dice,  despite  Basil's 
denunciation  of  the  immoral  songs  of  the  stage  and  the 
evils  of  gambling;  just  so,  we  suspect,  it  was  the  attractive 
morsels  of  Greek  astronomy,  botany,  and  zoology  which  he 
offered  them  that  induced  them  to  come  and  listen  further 
to  his  argument  from  design  and  his  moral  lessons  based 
upon  these  natural  phenomena.  Nor  were  they  likely  to 
observe  his  censure  of  incantations  and  nativities  more 
closely  than  his  condemnation  of  theater  and  gaming.  It 
would  be  rash  to  infer  that  they  always  practiced  what  he 
preached.  By  the  same  token,  even  if  the  church  fathers 
had  opposed  scientific  investigation — and  it  hardly  appears 
that  they  did — they  would  probably  have  been  no  more  suc- 
cessful in  checking  it  than  they  were  in  checking  the  com- 
merce of  Constantinople,  although  "S.  Ambrose  regards  the 
gains  of  merchants  as  for  the  most  part  fraudulent,  and  S. 
Chrysostom's  language  has  been  generally  appealed  to  in  a 
similar  sense."  ^ 

The  same  recognition  of  an  interest  In  nature  on  the 
part  of  his  audience  and  the  same  appeal  to  their  scientific 
curiosity,  which  we  have  seen  in  Basil's  sermons,  is  shown 
by  Epiphanius  of  Cyprus  (315-403)  writing  in  374-375 
A.  D.^  He  calls  his  work  against  heresies  the  Panarion, 
or  "Medicine  Chest,"  his  idea  being  to  provide  antidotes 
and  healing  herbs  in  the  form  of  salubrious  doctrine  against 
the  venom  of  heretics  whose  enigmas  he  compares  to  the 
bites  of  serpents  or  wild  beasts.  This  metaphor  is  more  or 
less  adhered  to  throughout  the  work,  and  particular  heresies 
are  compared  to  the  asp,  basilisk,  dipsas,^  buprestis,*  lizard, 
dog-fish  or  shark,  mole,  centipede,   scorpion,   and  various 


*  Cunningham,  Christian  Opinion 
on  Usury,  p.  9. 

'  Twice  in  the  course  of  the 
Panarion  (Dindorf,  I,  280,  and  II, 
428;  Petavius,  2D  and  404A)  he 
gives  the  year  of  the  reign  of 
Valentinian   and   Valens.  namely, 


the  eleventh  and  the  twelfth. 

^  Lucian's  De  dipsadibus  will  be 
recalled;  see  also  Pliny,  NH, 
XXIII,  80;  Lucan,  Pharsalia,  IX, 

*  Pliny,  NH,  XXIII,  18;  XXX, 
10. 


XXI         CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE         495 

vipers.  We  are  further  told  of  substances  that  drive  away 
serpents,  such  as  the  herbs  dictamnon,  abrotonum,  and 
lihanotis,  the  gum  storax,^  and  the  stone  gagates.  As  his 
authorities  in  such  matters  Epiphanius  states  that  he  uses 
Nicander  for  the  natures  of  beasts  and  reptiles,  and  for 
roots  and  plants  Dioscorides,  Pamphilus,  Mithridates  the 
king,  Callisthenes  and  Philo,  lolaos  the  Bithynian,  Hera- 
cleides  of  Tarentum,  and  a  number  of  other  names. ^ 

If  in  his  Panarion  Epiphanius  makes  use  of  ancient  Gems  in 
botany,  medicine,  and  zoology  for  purposes  of  comparison,  pj-^ests 
in  his  treatise  on  the  twelve  gems  in  the  breastplate  of  the  breast- 
Hebrew  high  priest  ^  he  perhaps  gives  an  excuse  and  sets 
the  fashion  for  the  Christian  medieval  Lapidaries.  This 
work  was  probably  composed  after  the  Panarion,  and  in 
the  opinion  of  Fogginius  even  later  than  392  A.  D.^  This 
treatise  probably  was  better  known  in  the  middle  ages  than 
the  Paimrion,  since  the  fullest  version  of  it  extant  is  the 
old  Latin  one,  while  the  Greek  text  which  has  survived 
seems  only  a  very  brief  epitome.  The  Greek  version,  how- 
ever, embodies  a  good  deal  of  what  is  said  concerning  the 
gems  themselves  and  their  virtues,  but  omits  entirely  the 
long  effort  to  identify  each  of  the  twelve  stones  with  one  of 
the  twelve  tribes  of  Israel,  which  is  left  unfinished  even 
in  the  Latin  version.  Epiphanius  shows  himself  rather 
chary  in  regard  to  such  virtues  attributed  to  gems  as  to 
calm  storms,  make  men  pacific,  and  confer  the  power  of 
divination.  He  does  not  go  so  far  as  to  omit  them  entirely, 
but  he  usually  qualifies  them  as  the  assertion  of  "those  who 
construct  fables"  or  "those  who  believe  fables."  It  is  with- 
out any  such  qualification,  however,  that  he  declares  that 
the  topaz, ^  when  ground  on  a  physician's  grindstone,  al- 
though red  itself,  emits  a  white  milky  fluid,  and,  moreover, 

*  Pliny,    NH,    XXV,    53;    XXI,  edition  of  the   Opera  of  Epipha- 

92;  XIX,  62;  XII,  40  and  55.  nius,    vol.    IV,    pp.    141-24S,    with 

'  Dindorf ,     II,     450;     Petavius,  the  preface  and  notes  of   Foggi- 

422C.  nius,    and    both    the    Latin    and 

^  Liber   de   XII  gemmis  ration-  Greek  versions. 

alis    summi    sacerdotis    Hebraeo-  *  Ibid.,  160-62. 

rum,      published      in      Dindorf's  "  P.   174. 


496  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

that  as  many  vessels  as  one  wishes  may  be  filled  with  this 
fluid  without  changing  the  appearance  or  shape  or  lessening 
the  weight  of  the  stone.  Skilled  physicians  also  attribute 
to  this  liquid  a  healing  effect  in  eye  troubles,  in  hydrophobia, 
and  in  the  case  of  those  who  have  gone  mad  from  eating 
grape-fish. 
Some  Epiphanius  mentions  a  few  other  gems  than  those  in  the 

other  high    priest's    breastplate.     Among    these    is    the    stone 

hyacinth  ^  which,  when  placed  upon  live  coals,  extinguishes 
them  without  injury  to  itself  and  which  is  also  beneficial 
to  women  in  childbirth,  and  drives  away  phantasms.  Cer- 
tain varieties  of  it  are  found  in  the  north  among  the  bar- 
barous Scythians.  The  gems  lie  at  the  bottom  of  a  deep 
valley  which  is  inaccessible  to  men  because  walled  in  com- 
pletely by  mountains,  and  moreover  from  the  summits  one 
cannot  see  into  the  valley  because  of  a  dark  mist  which  covers 
it.  How  men  ever  became  cognizant  of  the  fact  that  there 
are  gems  there  may  well  be  wondered  but  is  a  point  which 
Epiphanius  does  not  take  into  consideration.  He  simply 
tells  us  that  when  men  are  sent  to  obtain  some  of  these 
stones,  they  skin  sheep  and  hurl  the  carcasses  into  the  val- 
ley where  some  of  the  gems  adhere  to  the  flesh.  The  odor 
of  the  raw  meat  then  attracts  the  eagles,  whose  keener  sight 
is  perhaps  able  to  penetrate  the  mist,  although  Epiphanius 
does  not  say  so,  and  they  carry  the  carrion  to  their  nests 
in  the  mountains.  The  men  watch  where  the  eagles  have 
taken  the  meat  and  go  there  and  find  the  gems  which  have 
been  brought  out  with  it.  In  the  middle  ages  we  find  this 
same  story  in  a  slightly  different  form  told  of  Alexander 
the  Great  on  his  expedition  to  India.  Epiphanius  has  one 
thing  to  tell  of  India  himself  in  connection  with  gems, 
which  is  that  a  temple  of  Father  Liber  (Bacchus)  is  located 
there  which  is  said  to  have  three  hundred  and  sixty-five 
steps, — all  of  sapphire.^ 

'Pp.  190-91.  'Ibid.,  184. 


XXI         CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE         497 

The    problem    of    an    early    Christian    work    entitled   The  so- 
Physiologiis  is  no  easy  one,  although  much  has  been  writ-    physiolo- 

ten  concerning:  it  ^  and  more  has  been  taken  for  granted,    f"-^-'  vjpb- 

r  1-1,1  •  lem  of  Its 

For  instance,  one  often  meets  such  wild  and  sweepmg  state-    origin. 

ment  as  that  "the  name  Physiologus"  was  "given  to  a  cyclo- 
pedia of  what  was  known  and  imagined  about  earth,  sea, 
sky,  birds,  beasts,  and  fishes,  which  for  a  thousand  years 
was  the  authoritative  source  of  information  on  these  matters 
and  was  translated  into  every  European  tongue."  ^  My 
later  treatment  of  medieval  science  will  make  patent  the  in- 
accuracy of  such  a  statement.  But  to  return  to  the  prob- 
lem of  the  origin  of  Physiologus.  The  original  Greek 
text,^  which  some  would  put  back  in  the  first  half 
of  the  second  century  of  our  era,  if  it  ever  existed,  is 
now  lost,  and  its  previous  existence  and  character  are 
inferred  from  numerous  apparent  citations  of  it,  possible 
extracts  from  it,  and  what  are  taken  to  be  imita- 
tions, abbreviations,  amplifications,  adaptations,  and  trans- 
lations of  it  in  other  languages  and  of  later  date.  Thus  we 
have    versions     or     fragments     in    Armenian,*     Syriac,^ 

*  Pitra,  Spicilegium  Solesme'nse,  XXXIX  (1897),  49-55.     J.  Strzy- 

Paris,    185s,    III,    xlvii-lxxx.      K.  gowski,     D  e  r     Bilderkreis     des 

Ahrens,    Zur   Geschichte    des   so-  griechischen  Physiologus,  in  Bys. 

genannten  Physiologus,  1885.     M.  Zeitsch.  Erganzungsheft,  I  (1899). 

F.     Mann,     Bestiaire     Divin     de  E.  P.  Evans,  Animal  Symbolism  in 

Guillaume   Le    Clerc.      Heilbronn,  Ecclesiastical  Architecture,  1896,  is 

1888,   pp.    16-33,    "Entstehung   des  disappointing,   being  mainly  com- 

Physiologus    und    seine    Entwick-  piled  from  secondary  sources  and 

lung    im    Abendlande."      F.    Lau-  having  little  to  say  on   ecclesias- 

chert,  Geschichte  des  Physioloaiis,  tical  architecture. 

Strassburg,   1889.     E.  Peters,  Der  '  EB,     nth    ed.,    "Arthropoda." 

griechische  Physiologus  und  seine  ^Lauchert     (1889),    pp.    229-79, 

orientalise  hen         Uehersetzungen,  attempts  a  critical  edition  of  the 

Berlin,   1898.     M.   Goldstaub,  Der  Greek  text. 

Physiologus    und    seine     Weiter-  *  Pitra      (1855),      III,      374-90; 

bildung,   besonders  in  dcr_  latein-  French      translation      in      Cahier, 

ischcn  und  in  der  byzantinischen  Nouveaux     melanges     (1874),     I, 

Litteratur,    in    Philologus,    Suppl.  117,  ct  seq. 

Bd.    yill     (1898-1901),    337-404-  °0.    G.    Tychsen,    Physiologies 

Also    in    Verhandl.    d.    41    Ver-  Syrus,  1795;   from  an  incomplete 

sammlung     deutscher    Philologen  Vatican  AIS.     Land,  Otia  Syriaca, 

u.  _  Schulmdnner     in     MUnchen,  p.    31,    et    seq.,    or    in    Anecdota 

Leipzig    (1892),    pp.    212-21.      V.  Syriaca,  IW ,  lis,  et  seq.,  g\vts  tha 

Schultze,  Der  Physiologus  in  der  complete  text  with  a  Latin  trans- 

kirchlichen    Kunst    des    Mittelal-  lation. 
ters,    in    Christliches    Kunstblatt, 


498 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Ethiopian/  and  Arabic ;  ^  a  Greek  text  from  medieval  manu- 
scripts, mostly  of  late  date ;  ^  various  Latin  versions  in 
numerous  manuscripts  from  the  eighth  century  on ;  *  in  Old 
High  German  a  prose  translation  of  about  looo  A.  D.  and 
a  poetical  version  later  in  the  same  language ;  ^  and 
Bestiaries  such  as  those  of  Philip  of  Thaon  ^  and  William 


^  Hommel,  Die  aethiopische 
Uebersetzung  des  Physiologus, 
Leipzig,  1877.  A  bit  of  it  was 
translated  by  Pitra  (1855),  III, 
416-7. 

*  Land,  Otia  Syriaca,  p.  137,  et 
seq.,  with  Latin  translation.  A 
fragment  in  Pitra  (1855),  III, 
535. 

^  Pitra  (1855),  HI,  3Z^-72„  used 
MSS  from  the  13th  to  15th  cen- 
tury. The  earliest  known  illu- 
minated copies  are  of  iioo  A.  D. 
and  later :  see  Dalton,  Byzantine 
Art  and  Archaeology,  Oxford, 
191 1,  pp.  481-2. 

*The  oldest  Latin  MSS  seem 
to  be  two  of  the  8th  and  9th  cen- 
turies at  Berne.  Edited  by  Mai, 
Classici  auctores,  Rome,  1835, 
VII,  585-96,  and  more  completely 
by  Pitra  (1855),  III,  418;  also 
by  G.  Heider,  in  Archiv  f. 
Kunde  osterreich.  Geschichtsquel- 
len,  Vienna,  1850,  II,  545 ;  Cahier 
et  Martin,  Melanges  d'archeologie, 
Paris,  II  (1851),  85fif.,  Ill  (1853), 
203ff.,  IV  (1856),  55fif.  Cahier, 
Nouveaux  melanges  (1874),  p, 
io6ff. 

Mann  (1888),  pp.  37-73,  prints 
the  Latin  text  which  he  regards  as 
William  le  Clerc's  source  from 
Royal  2-C-XII,  and  gives  a  list  of 
other  MSS  of  Latin  Bestiaries  in 
English  libraries. 

Other  medieval  Latin  Bestiaries 
have  been  printed  in  the  works  of 
Hildebert  of  Tours  or  Le  Mans 
(Migne,  PL,  171,  1217-24:  really 
this  poem  concerning  only  twelve 
animals  is  by  Theobald,  who  was 
perhaps  abbot  at  Monte  Cassino, 
1022-T035,  and  it  was  printed 
under  the  name  of  Theobald  be- 
fore 1500, — see  the  volume  num- 
bered lA. 12367  in  the  British 
Museum  and  entitled,  Phisiologus 
Theobaldi     Episcopi     de     natiiris 


duodecim  animalium.  Indeed,  it 
was  printed  at  least  nine  times 
under  his  name, — see  Hain, 
15467-75)  :  and  in  the  works  of 
Hugh  of  St.  Victor  (Migne,  PL, 
''^77,  9-164,  De  bestiis  et  aliis  rebus 
libri  quatuor).  Both  of  these 
versions  occur  in  numerous  MSS, 
as  does  a  third  version  which 
opens  with  citation  of  the  remark 
of  Jacob  in  blessing  his  sons, 
"Judah  is  a  lion's  whelp."  The 
author  then  cites  Physiologus  as 
usual  concerning  the  three  natures 
of  the  lion.  See  Wolfenbiittel 
4435,  nth  century,  fols.  159-68V, 
Liber  bestiarum.  "De  leone  rege 
bestiarum  et  animalium  (est) 
etenim  iacob  benedicens  iudam  ait 
Catulus  leonis  iuda.  De  leone. 
Leo  tres  naturas  habet."  Laud. 
Misc.  247,  I2th  century,  fol. 
140-,  .  .  .  caps.  36,  praevia  tabula 
.  .  .  Tit.  "De  tribus  naturis 
leonis."  Incip.  "Bestiarium  seu 
animalium  regis ;  etenim  Jacob 
benedicens  filium  suum  Udam 
ait  Catulus  leonis  Judas  filius 
meus  quis  suscitabit  eum ;  Fisiolo- 
gus  dicit,  Tres  res  naturales 
habere  leonem.  .  .  ."  Library  of 
Dukes  of  Burgundy  10074,  loth 
century,  "Etenim  Jacob  benedi- 
cens." CLM  19648,  15th  century, 
fols.  180-95,  "Igitur  Jacob  bene- 
dicens." CLM  237S7,  15th  cen- 
tury, fols.  12-20,  "Igitur  Jacob 
benedicens."  CU  Trinity  884, 
13th  century  in  a  fine  hand,  with 
107  English  miniatures,  fol.  89-, 
"Et  enim  iacob  benedicens  filium 
suum  iudam  ait  catulus  leonis  est 
iudas  filius  meus";  this  MS  ends 
imperfectly. 

''Printed  by  Lauchert  (1889), 
pp.  280-90. 

*  Max  F.  Mann,  Der  Physiolo- 
gus des  Philipp  von  Thaon  und 
seine  Quellen,  Halle,  1884,  53  pp. 


XXI 


CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE 


499 


the  Clerk  ^  in  the  Romance  languages  ^  and  other  vernacu- 
lars.^ The  Physiologus  has  been  thought  to  have  originated 
in  Alexandria  because  of  its  use  of  the  Egyptian  names  for 
the  months  and  because  Clement  of  Alexandria  and  Origen 
are  supposed  to  have  made  use  of  it.  But  it  is  difficult 
to  determine  whether  the  church  fathers  drew  passages  con- 
cerning animals  and  nature  from  some  such  work  or  whether 
it  was  a  collection  of  passages  from  their  writings  upon 
such  themes.  Ahrens,  who  thought  he  found  the  original 
form  of  the  work  in  a  Syriac  Book  of  the  Things  of  Nature,"^ 
regarded  Origen  as  its  author.  In  a  medical  manuscript 
at  Vienna  is  a  Physiologus  in  Greek  ascribed  to  Epiphanius 
of  Cyprus,^  of  whom  we  have  just  been  treating,  while  we 
hear  that  Pope  Gelasius  at  a  synod  of  496  condemned  as 
apocryphal  a  Physiologus  which  was  written  by  heretics 
and  ascribed  to  Ambrose,®  who  so  closely  duplicated  the 
Hexaemeron  of  Basil.  A  work  on  the  natures  of  animals  is 
also  attributed  to  John  Chrysostom.'^    I  am  not  sure  whether 

*  Mann,  Bestiaire  Divin  de 
Guillaume  Le  Clerc,  Heilbronn, 
1888,  in  Fransosische  Studien,  VI, 
2,  pp.  201-306.  Most  recent  edition 
by  Robert,  Leipzig,  1890. 

'  Besides  the  two  foregoing  see 
Goldstaub  und  Wendriner,  Ein 
tosco-venes.  Bestiarius,  Halle,  1892, 
Magliabech.  IV,  63,  13th  century, 
mutilated,  53  fols.,  bestiario  mo- 
ralizato,  in  Italian  prose.  E. 
Monaci,  Rendiconti  dell'  Accad. 
dei  Lincei,  Class  e  di  scien::e 
morali,  storiche  e  filol,  vol.  V, 
fasc.  10  and  12,  has  edited  a 
Bestiario  in  64  sonetti  on  as  many 
animals  from  a  private  MS  at 
"Gubbio  neir  archivio  degli  avvo- 
cati  Pietro  e  Oderisi  Lucarelli," 
MS  25,  fols.  112-27.  See  also  M. 
Carver  and  K.  McKenzie,  //  Bes- 
tiario Toscano  secondo  la  lesione 
dei  codice  di  Parigi  e  di  Roma,  in 
Studi  romansi,  Rome,  1912;  Mc- 
Kenzie, Unpublished  Manuscripts 
of  Italian  Bestiaries,  in  Modern 
La'nguage  Publications,  XX 
(1905),  2;  and  Carver,  "Some 
Supplementary  Italian  Bestiary 
Chapters,"    in    Romanic    Review, 


XI  (1920),  308-27. 

^  For  instance,  A.  S.  Cook,  The 
Old  English  Elene,  Phoenix,  and 
Physiologus,  Yale  University 
Press,  364  pp.,  1919. 

*  K.  Ahrens,  Das  "Buch  der 
Naturgegenstdnde,"  1892. 

*  Cod.  Vind.  Med.  29,  tov  ayiov 
'Kin4>avlov  eTrLaKoirov  lK.virpov  irepl  ttjs 
Xe^ecos  Trdfrcof  to3v  fcowc  <l)V(TLo\oyos. 
In  the  edition  of  Ponce  de  Leon, 
Rome,  1587,  there  are  twenty  ani- 
mals described,  and  the  symbolic 
interpretation  is  very  short  com- 
pared to  later  versions.  Heider 
(1850),  p.  543,  regarded  this  as 
the  oldest  version  and  as  extant  in 
complete  form. 

^Mansi,  Condi,  VIII,  151, 
"Liber  Physiologus  ab  hereticis 
conscriptus  et  beati  Ambrosii 
nomine  presignatus  apocryphus." 

'Hejder  (1850),  II,  541-82, 
"Physiologus  nach  einer  Hand- 
schrift  des  XI  Jahrhunderts" :  the 
text  opens  at  p.  552,  "Incipiunt 
Dicta  Johannis  Chrysostomi  de 
naturis  bestiarum."  Lauchert  used 
another  MS,  Vienna  303,  14th 
century,    fol.    124V-,    which    was 


500  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

a  PhysiologMS  ascribed  to  John  the  Scot  in  a  tenth  century 

Latin  manuscript  is  the  same  work.^ 

TDoes  the  The  Physiologus  is  commonly  described  as  a  symboUc 

to  any^one  bestiary,  in  which  the  characteristics  and  properties  of  ani- 

particular    mals  are  accompanied  by  Christian  allesrories  and  instruc- 
treatise?         •  <-  i  i  i 

tion.     Some  have  almost  gone  so  far  as  to  hold  that  any 

passages  of  this  sort  are  evidence  of  an  author's  having 
employed  the  Physiologus,  which  some  have  held  influenced 
the  middle  ages  more  than  any  other  book  except  the  Bible. 
But  Pitra's  point  is  well  taken  that  the  Physiologus  is  one 
thing  and  the  allegorical  interpretation  thereof  another.  In 
the  case  of  the  discordant  versions  or  fragments  which  he 
gathered  and  published  from  different  manuscripts,  cen- 
turies, and  languages,  he  noted  one  common  feature,  that 
the  allegorical  interpretation  was  sharply  separated  from 
the  extracts  from  Physiologus  and  sometimes  omitted  en- 
tirely. This  is  what  one  would  naturally  expect  since  a 
physiologus  is  a  natural  scientist  on  whose  statements  con- 
cerning this  or  that  the  allegorical  interpretation  is  presum- 
ably based  and  added  thereto.  But  this  suggests  another 
difficulty  in  identifying  Physiologus  as  a  single  work.  The 
abbreviations  for  the  word  in  medieval  manuscripts  are  very 
easily  confused  with  those  for  philosophers  or  phisici  (phys- 
ical scientists),  and  just  as  medieval  writers  often  cite  what 
the  philosophers  say  or  the  phisici  say  without  having  refer- 
ence to  any  particular  book,  so  may  they  not  cite  what 
physiologi  or  even  physiologus  says  without  having  any 
particular  writer  in  mind?     In  the  De  hestiis  ascribed  to 

considerably     different     and     was  erit    et    scriba    doctus    in    regno 

furthermore    combined    with    the  celorum    qui   profert   de  thesauro 

Physiologus     of     Theobald.     An  suo    noua    et    uetera.      Expliciunt 

earlier    SlS    than    either    of    the  dicta     Johannis     Crisostomi."     A 

foregoing  is  CLM  19417,  Qth  cen-  Paris  MS  of  the  same  is  BN  2780, 

tury,     fols.     29-71,     Liber     Sancti  13th    century,    14,    Sancti    loannis 

Johannis     episcopi     regiae     urbis  Chrysostomi  liber  qui  physiologus 

Constantinopoli    .    .    .    Crisostomi  appellatur. 

quern    de    naturis    animalium    or-  ^Additional      11,035,      Johannis 

dinavit.     Another   Vienna    MS   is  Scottigenae       Phisiologiae      liber. 

2511,    14th    century,    fols.    135-40,  In   the  same^MS  are   Macrobius' 

"Incipiunt    dicta    Johannis    Chry-  Dream  of  Scipio  and  the  poems  of 

sostomi   de   naturis   animalium   et  Prudentius. 
primo      de      leone  .../...  Sic 


XXI         CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE  501 

Hugh  of  St.  Victor  of  the  twelfth  century  physici  are  cited  ^ 
as  well  as  Physiologiis.  When  Albertus  Magnus  states  in  the 
thirteenth  century  in  his  work  on  minerals  that  the  physi- 
ologi  have  assigned  very  different  causes  for  the  marvelous 
occult  virtue  in  stones,  he  evidently  simply  alludes  to  the  opin- 
ions of  scientists  in  general  and  has  no  such  work  or  works  as 
the  so-called  Physiologus  in  mind.^  This  is  also  clearly 
the  case  in  a  fragment  from  the  introduction  to  a  Latin 
translation  from  the  Arabic  of  some  treatise  on  the  astrolabe, 
in  which  we  find  phisiologi  cited  as  astronomical  authori- 
ties.^ Furthermore,  even  in  works  which  deal  with  the 
natures  of  animals  and  which  either  have  the  word  Physiolo- 
gus in  their  titles  or  cite  it  now  and  then  in  the  course  of 
their  texts,  there  exists  such  diversity  that  it  becomes  fairly 
evident  not  only  that  it  is  impossible  to  deduce  from  them 
the  list  of  animals  treated  in  the  original  Physiologiis  or 
the  details  which  it  gave  concerning  each,  but  also  that  it 
is  highly  probable  that  the  title  Physiologus  has  been  applied 
to  different  treatises  which  did  not  necessarily  have  a  com- 
mon origin.  Or  at  least  the  greatest  liberties  were  taken 
with  the  original  text  and  title,^  so  that  the  word  Physiologus 
came  to  apply  less  to  any  particular  book,  author,  or  au- 
thority than  to  almost  any  treatment  of  animals  in  a  certain 
style. 

But  of  what  style?    It  has  too  often  been  assumed  that   And  to 
theology  dominated  all  medieval  thought  and  that  natural    ^ f  a  ^ 
science  was  employed  only  for  purposes  of  religious  sym-    treatise? 
holism.     Of  this  general  assumption  the  Physiologus  has 
been  seized  upon  as  an  apt  illustration  and  it  has  been  repre- 
sented as  a  symbolic  bestiary  which  influenced  the  middle 
ages  more  than  any  other  book  except  the  Bible  ^  and  whose 
allegories  accounted  for  the  animal  sculpture  of  the  Gothic 

^De  hestiis  et  aliis  rebus,  II,  i  ''Thus  even  Lauchert  (1899),  P- 
(Migne,  PL  177,  57).  "Physici  105,  admits  that  Bartholomew  of 
denique  dicunt  quinque  natu-  England,  the  thirteenth  century- 
rales  res  sive  naturas  habere  Latin  encyclopedist,  cites  Physi- 
leonem.  .  .  ."  ologus  for  much  which  does  not 

'Mineral.,  II,  i,  i   (ed.  Borgnet,  come  from  Physiologus. 

V,  24).  'Goldstaub   (1899-1901),  p.  341. 

*  Bubnov  ( 1899) ,  p.  372, 


502 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Medieval 
art  shows 
almost  no 
symbolic 
influence 
of  the 
Physiolo- 
gies, 


Physiolo- 

gus  was 

more 

natural 

scientist 

than 

allegorist. 


cathedrals  and  the  strange  or  familiar  beasts  in  the  borders 
of  the  Bayeux  Tapestry,  the  margins  of  illuminated  manu- 
scripts, and  so  on  and  so  forth. 

The  more  recent  scientific  study  of  medieval  art  has 
largely  dissipated  this  latter  notion.  It  has  become  evident 
that  in  the  main  medieval  men  represented  animals  in  art 
because  they  were  fond  of  animals,  not  because  they  were 
fond  of  allegories.  Their  art  was  natural,  not  symbolic. 
They  were,  says  Male,  "craftsmen  who  delighted  in  nature 
for  its  own  sake,  sometimes  lovingly  copying  the  living 
forms,  sometimes  playing  with  them,  combining  and  con- 
torting them  as  they  were  led  by  their  own  caprice."  St. 
Bernard,  although  "the  prince  of  allegorists,"  saw  no  sense 
in  the  animal  sculptures  in  Romanesque  cloisters  and  in- 
veighed against  them.  In  short,  with  the  exception  of  the 
symbols  of  the  four  evangelists,  "there  are  few  cases  in 
which  it  is  permissible  to  assign  symbolic  meaning  to  animal 
forms,"  and  it  is  "evident  that  the  fauna  and  flora  of 
medieval  art,  natural  or  fantastic,  have  in  most  cases  a  value 
that  is  purely  decorative."  "To  sum  up,"  concludes  Male, 
"we  are  of  the  opinion  that  the  Bestiaries  of  which  we  hear 
so  much  from  the  archaeologists  had  no  real  influence  on  art 
until  their  substance  passed  into  Honorius  of  Autun's  bopk 
(Speculum  ecclesiae,  c.  1090-1120)  and  from  that  book 
into  sermons.  I  have  searched  in  vain  (with  but  two  ex- 
ceptions) for  representations  of  the  hedgehog,  beaver,  tiger, 
and  other  animals  which  figure  in  the  Bestiaries  but  which 
are  not  mentioned  by  Honorius."  ^ 

These  assertions  concerning  medieval  art  hold  true  also 
to  a  large  extent  of  medieval  literature  and  medieval  science, 
although  they  were  perhaps  less  natural  and  original  than 
it  and  more  dependent  on  past  tradition  and  authority.  But 
medieval  men,  as  we  shall  see,  studied  nature  from  scientific 
curiosity  and  not  in  search  for  spiritual  allegories,  and  even 
Goldstaub   recognizes   that  by  the  thirteenth  century   the 


*This  and  the  preceding  quotations  in  the  paragraph  are  from  Male 
(1913),  pp.  48,  35,  49.  4S. 


XXI         CHRISTIANITY  AND  NATURAL  SCIENCE         503 

scientific  zoology  of  Aristotle  submerged  that  of  the 
Physiologies  in  writers  like  Thomas  of  Cantimpre  and 
Albertus  Magnus  who,  although  they  may  still  embody  por- 
tions of  the  Pkysiologus,  divest  it  of  its  characteristic  re- 
ligious elements.^  But  were  its  characteristic  elements  ever 
religious  ?  Were  they  not  always  scientific  or  pseudo-scien- 
tific? Ahrens  holds  that  the  title  was  taken  from  Aristotle 
in  the  first  place,  and  that  Pliny  was  the  chief  source  for 
the  contents.  The  allegories  do  not  appear  in  such  early 
texts  as  the  Syriac  version  or  the  fragments  preserved  in 
the  Latin  Glossary  of  Ansileubus.  Not  even  the  introduc- 
tory scriptural  texts  appear  in  the  Greek  version  ascribed 
to  Epiphanius.  Moreover,  in  the  Bestiaries  where  the  alle- 
gorical applications  are  included,  it  is  for  the  natures  of 
the  animals,  the  supposedly  scientific  facts  on  which  the 
symbolism  is  based,  and  for  these  alone  that  Physiologus  is 
cited  in  the  text.  Thus  the  symbolism  would  appear  to  be 
somewhat  adventitious,  while  the  pseudo-science  is  constant. 
It  is  obvious  that  the  allegorical  applications  cannot  do  with- 
out the  supposed  facts  concerning  animals;  on  the  other 
hand,  the  supposedly  scientific  information  can  and  does 
frequently  dispense  with  the  allegories.  We  do  not  know 
who  was  responsible  for  the  allegorical  interpretations  in 
the  first  instance.  Hommel  would  carry  the  origin  of  their 
symbolism  back  of  the  Christian  era  to  the  animal  worship 
of  Persia,  India,  and  Egypt. ^  But  we  are  assured  over  and 
over  again  that  Natural  Scientist  or  Physiologus  vouches 
for  the  statements  concerning  the  natures  of  animals.  Thus 
the  symbolic  significance  of  the  literature  that  has  been 
grouped  under  the  title  Physiologus  has  been  exaggerated, 
while  the  respect  for  and  interest  in  natural  science  to  which 
it  testifies  have  too  often  been  lost  sight  of. 

*  Goldstaub       (1899-1901),      pp.       cent   of    Beauvais   and    Bartholo 
350-1.     The  same  statement  could      mew  of  England. 
be  made  with  equal  truth  of  Vin-  'Hommel  (1877),  pp.  xii,  xv. 


CHAPTER  XXII 

AUGUSTINE  ON  MAGIC  AND  ASTROLOGY 

Date  and  influence  of  Augustine — Christianity  and  magic — Censure 
of  magic  and  theurgy  as  well  as  Goetia — Magic  due  to  demons — Mar- 
vels wrought  by  magic — Cannot  be  equalled  by  most  Christian^ — 
Miracles  of  heretics — Theory  of  demons — Limitations  to  the  power  of 
magic — Its  fantastic  character — Samuel  and  the  witch  of  Endor — 
Natural  marvels — Relation  between  magic  and  science — Superstitions 
akin  to  magic — Survival  of  pagan  superstition  among  the  laity — Augus- 
tine's attack  upon  astrology — Fate  and  free  will — Argument  from  twins 
— Defense  of  the  astrologers — Elections — Are  animals  and  plants  under 
the  stars? — Failure  to  disprove  the  control  of  nature  by  the  stars — 
Natural  divination  and  prophetic  visions — The  star  at  Christ's  birth 
— Nature  of  the  stars — Orosius  on  the  Priscillianists  and  Origenists — 
Augustine's  letter — Attitude  toward  astronomy — Perfect  numbers. 

Date  and  The  utterances  of  Augustine  concerning  magic  and  astrol- 
of  Augus-  '^Sy  have  been  reserved  for  separate  treatment  in  this 
tine.  chapter,  partly  because  of  his  late  date,  354  to  430  A.  D., 

partly  because  of  the  voluminousness  of  his  writings,  but 
especially  because  of  his  approach  to  and  influence  upon 
the  thought  of  the  middle  ages.  It  is,  moreover,  in  his 
epoch-making  book,  The  City  of  God,  which  better  than  any 
other  single  event  marks,  or  at  least  sums  up,  the  transition 
from  classical  to  medieval  civilization,  from  the  life  of  the 
ancient  city  to  that  of  the  medieval  church,  that  he  descants 
with  especial  fulness  upon  magic,  demons,  and  astrology, 
although  he  often  also  refers  to  these  themes  in  his  other 
treatises,  which  we  shall  cite  as  well.  I  separate  the  words, 
magic  and  astrology,  here  because  Augustine,  like  most  of 
the  fathers,  does  so.  Of  Augustine's  discussion  of  the 
Biblical  account  of  creation  in  his  Confessions  and  De  Genesi 
ad  litteram  I  shall  not  treat,  having  already  presented  Basil's 
Hexaemeron  as  an  example  of  this  type  of  work  and  of 

504 


CHAP.  XXII 


AUGUSTINE 


505 


the  Christian  attitude  toward  natural  science.^  But  later 
in  treating  of  medieval  writers  on  nature  I  may  have  occa- 
sion to  point  out  certain  passages  in  which  they  may  have 
been  influenced  by  Augustine. 

Even  though  writing  in  the  fifth  century  Augustine  still 
finds  it  necessary  to  defend  Christ  against  those  who  imagine 
that  He  has  converted  peoples  to  Himself  by  means  of  the 
magic  art.^  And  he  tells  us  of  books  of  magic  which  are 
ascribed  to  Christ  Himself  or  to  the  apostles  Peter  and  Paul.^ 
In  reply  to  such  charges  or  assertions  he  insists  that  Chris- 
tians have  nothing  to  do  with  magic,  and  that  their  miracles 
"were  wrought  by  simple  confidence  and  devout  faith,  not 
by  incantations  and  spells  compounded  by  an  art  of  de- 
praved curiosity."  ^  And  he  brings  the  counter-charge 
against  Roman  religion  that  King  Numa,  its  founder, 
learned  its  secrets  and  sacred  rites  by  means  of  hydromancy 
or  necromancy.^  He  admits,  however,  that  condemnation 
of  magic  and  legislation  against  it  had  begun  before  Chris- 
tianity.® 

Augustine  uniformly  speaks  of  magic  with  censure  and 
several  times  adverts  to  "the  crimes  of  magicians."  '^  He 
speaks,  however,  of  goetia  or  sorcery  as  "a  more  detestable 
name"  than  magia  and  of  "theurgy"  as  "an  honorable 
name."  He  also  states  that  some  persons  draw  a  distinc- 
tion between  the  malefici  or  sorcerers  or  practitioners  of 
goetia,  whom  they  call  truly  guilty  of  illicit  arts  and  de- 
serving of  condemnation,  and  those  who  practice  theurgy, 
whom  they  call  praiseworthy.     Porphyry,  for  instance,  had 


^Duhem,  II  (1914),  314,  seems 
to  me  to  have  over-estimated  the 
significance  of  Confessions,  V,  5, 
and  De  Gencsi  ad  litteram,  I,  19, 
in  saying,  "L'assurance  ayec 
laquelle  les  Basile,  les  Gregoire  de 
Nysse,  les  Ambroise,  les  Jean 
Chrysostome  opposaient  aux  en- 
seignements  de  la  Physique  pro- 
fane les  naives  assertions  de  leur 
science  puerile  contristait  fort 
rfiveque  de  Hippone."  There  is 
nothing,  I  think,  to  indicate  that 
Augustine  had  these  men  or  men 


of  their  stamp  in  mind,  and  I 
doubt  if  his  scientific  attainments 
were  superior  to  Basil's. 

^De  co'nsensu  Evangelistarutn, 
I,  11;  in  Migne,  PL  34,  1049-50. 

^  Ibid.,  I,  9-10. 

*De  civitate  Dei,  X,  9;  PL  vol. 

^  Ibid.,  VII,  34-35;  and  see  Ar- 
nobius,  Against  the  Heathen,  V,  i, 
for    Augustine's    probable    source. 

'De  civ.  Dei,  VIII,  19. 

'Ibid.,  VIII,  18,  19,  26;  IX,  I. 


Christi- 
anity and 
magic. 


Magic  and 
theurgy 
censured 
as  well  as 
Goetia. 


So6 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Magic  due 
to  demons. 


Marvels 
wrought 
by  magic. 


Stated  that  theurgy  was  useful  to  purge  the  soul  and  pre- 
pare it  to  receive  spirits  and  to  see  God.  Augustine,  how- 
ever, holds  that  in  other  passages  Porphyry  condemned 
theurgy,  and  in  any  case  he  himself  refuses  to  sanction  it.-^ 
He  stoutly  denies  that  "souls  are  purged  and  reconciled  to 
God  through  sacrilegious  likenesses  and  impious  curiosity 
and  magic  consecrations."  ^  Very  possibly  Augustine  would 
have  classed  as  improper  theurgy  some  of  the  use  of  power- 
ful names  described  by  Origen. 

At  any  rate  Augustine  declares  that  theurgists  and  sor- 
cerers alike  "are  entangled  in  the  deceitful  rites  of  demons 
who  may  masquerade  under  the  names  of  angels."  ^  For 
it  is  to  demons  that  Augustine,  like  most  of  our  Christian 
writers,  attributes  both  the  origin  and  the  success  of  magic. 
The  demons  are  enticed  by  men  to  work  marvels,  not  by 
ciferings  of  food,  as  if  they  were  animals,  but  by  symbols 
which  conform  to  the  individual  taste  of  each  as  a  spirit, 
namely,  various  stones,  plants,  trees,  animals,  incantations, 
and  ceremonies,* — a  good  brief  summary  of  the  materials 
and  methods  of  magic.  Augustine  believes  that  the  spirits 
had  first  to  instruct  men  what  rites  to  perform  and  by  what 
names  to  call  them  in  order  to  summon  them. 

But  when  once  the  demons  have  revealed  their  secrets, 
henceforth  the  charms  of  the  magic  art  have  efficacy.  Of 
the  marvels  worked  by  means  of  magic  Augustine  has  little 
doubt ;  to  deny  them  would  indeed  in  his  opinion  be  to  deny 
the  truth  of  the  Scriptures,  to  whose  accounts  of  Pharaoh's 
magicians,^  the  witch  of  Endor,  and  the  Magi  and  the  star, 
he  adverts  many  times  in  his  various  works.  If  actors  in 
the  theater  and  performers  in  spectacles  are  able  by  art 
and  exercise  to  display  astounding  alterations  in  the  appear- 
ance of  their  earthly  bodies,  why  may  not  the  demons  with 


*  De  civ.  Dei,  X,  9-10. 

*De  trinitate,  IV,  11;  in  Migne, 
PL  42,  897. 

*  De  civ.  Dei,  X,  9. 
*De  civ.  Dei,  XXI,  6. 

"  In  Grenoble  208,  12th  century, 
containing    works    of    Augustine, 


there  is  listed  separately  at  fol. 
S4V,  "De  magis  Pharaonis,"  to 
which  the  MSS  catalogue  adds, 
"et  de  CLIII  piscibus."  Probably 
it  is  an  extract  from  one  of 
Augustine's  longer  works  as  it 
covers  only  one  leaf. 


XXII 


AUGUSTINE 


507 


tians. 


their  aerial  bodies  produce  marvelous  changes  in  elementary 
substances  or  by  occult  influence  construct  phantom  images 
to  delude  human  senses  ?  ^  Augustine  even  grants  that  the 
magicians  are  able  to  terrify  the  inferior  spirits  into  obedi- 
ence to  their  commands  by  adjuring  them  by  the  names  of 
superior  spirits,  and  thereby  with  divine  permission  "to 
exhibit  to  the  eye  of  sense  certain  results  which  seem  great 
and  marvelous  to  men  who  through  weakness  of  the  flesh 
are  incapable  of  beholding  things  eternal."  He  does  not  re- 
gard this  as  inconsistent  with  the  assertion  of  Jesus  that 
Satan  cannot  cast  out  Satan,  since  while  it  may  be  that  thus 
demons  are  expelled  from  sick  bodies,  the  evil  one  thereby 
only  the  more  surely  takes  possession  of  the  soul,^ 

Augustine  further  grants  that  magicians,  although  Cannot  be 
stained  with  crime,  can  at  present  work  miracles  which  most  by"mo^st 
Christians  and  even  most  saints  cannot  perform.  For  this,  Chris- 
however,  he  finds  Scriptural  precedent.  Pharaoh's  magicians 
performed  feats  which  none  of  the  Children  of  Israel  could 
equal  except  Moses  who  excelled  them  by  divine  aid.  Au- 
gustine, like  earlier  fathers,  usually  fails  to  mention  Aaron 
in  this  connection.^  This  superiority  of  magicians  to  most 
Christians  in  working  marvels  Augustine  believes  is  divinely 
ordained  so  that  Christians  may  remain  humble  and  practice 
works  of  justice  rather  than  seek  to  perform  miracles. 
Magicians  seek  their  own  glory;  the  saints  strive  only  for 
the  glory  of  God.  And  the  more  marvelous  are  the  feats 
of  magic,  the  more  Christians  should  shun  them ;  the  greater 
the  power  of  the  demons,  the  closer  Christians  should  cling 
to  that  Mediator  who  alone  can  raise  men  from  the  lowest 
depths.* 

Like  Origen,  Augustine  further  distinguishes  the  mir- 
acles wrought  by  heretics  both  from  magic  and  from  the 
miracles  of  true  Christians.     He  holds  that  every  soul  in 

PL  38,  562, 
"Moyses    et 


Miracles 
of  here- 
tics. 


^De  trinitate,  IV,  11. 

'De  diversis  quaestionibus,  cap. 
79;  Migne,  PL  40,  92-3. 

'  See  also  De  cataclysmo  (per- 
haps spurious),  cap.  5,  Migne, 
PL  40,  696 ;  and  Sermo  VIII,  PL 


38,  74.  Sermo  XC, 
however,  speaks  of 
Aaron." 

*De  civ.  Dei,  XXI,  6;  XVIII, 
18. 


5o8 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Theory  of 
demons. 


Limita- 
tions to 
the  power 
of  magic. 


part  controls  itself  and  exercises  as  it  were  a  private  juris- 
diction, in  part  is  subject  to  the  laws  of  the  universe  just 
as  any  citizen  is  amenable  to  public  jurisdiction.  Therefore 
magicians  perform  their  marvels  by  private  contracts  with 
demons;  good  Christians  perform  theirs  by  public  justice; 
bad  Christians  perform  theirs  by  the  appearance  or  signs 
of  public  justice.^  This  view  would  seem  to  indicate  that 
God,  like  the  demons,  regards  the  signs  alone  and  not  the 
character  and  purpose  of  the  performer,  so  that  Christian 
miracles,  if  they  can  be  duplicated  by  heretics,  would  appear 
to  be  largely  a  matter  of  procedure  and  art,  like  magic. 

For  his  theory  of  demons  and  their  characteristics  Au- 
gustine seems  largely  indebted  to  Apuleius,  whom  he  cites  in 
several  chapters  of  the  eighth  and  ninth  books  of  The  City 
of  God.  In  his  separate  treatise,  The  Divination  of 
Demons,^  he  explains  their  ability  to  predict  the  future  and 
to  perform  marvels  by  the  keenness  of  their  sense,  their 
rapidity  of  movement,  their  long  experience  of  nature  and 
life,  and  the  subtlety  of  their  aerial  bodies.  This  last  quality 
enables  them  to  penetrate  human  bodies  or  affect  the 
thoughts  of  men  without  men  being  aware  of  their  presence. 
Augustine,  however,  of  course  does  not  believe  that  the 
world  of  nature  is  completely  under  the  control  of  the 
demons.  God  alone  created  it  and  He  still  governs  it,  and 
the  demons  are  able  to  do  only  as  much  as  He  permits.^ 

There  were,  for  example,  some  things  which  Pharaoh's 
magicians  could  not  do  and  in  which  Moses  clearly  ex- 
celled them.  They  were  able  to  change  their  rods  into 
snakes  but  his  snake  devoured  theirs.  How  the  magicians 
got  their  rods  back,  if  at  all,  neither  Augustine  nor  the 
Book  of  Exodus  informs  us.  But  whether  with  or  without 
their  magic  wands,  they  were  still  able  to  duplicate  one  or  two 
of  the  plagues  sent  upon  Egypt.  Augustine  explains  that 
neither  they  nor  the  demons  who  helped  them  really  created 
snakes  and  frogs,  but  that  there  are  certain  seeds  of  life 

^De  divcrsis  quaestionibus,  cap. 
79;  De  doctrina  Christiana,  II, 
20,  in  Migne,  PL  34,  50.  875. 


Migne,  PL  40,  581-92. 

De   trinitate,   III,   8;    PL,    ^ 


XXII 


AUGUSTINE 


509 


hidden  away  In  the  elemental  bodies  of  this  world  of  which 
they  made  use.  But  their  magic  failed  them  when  it  came 
to  the  reproduction  of  minute  insects. ■*•  Augustine  further- 
more has  some  hesitation  about  accepting  the  stories  of 
magic  transformations  of  men  into  animals,  which  he  repre- 
sents as  current  in  his  own  day  as  well  as  in  times  past,  so 
that  certain  female  inn-keepers  in  Italy  are  said  to  transform 
travelers  into  beasts  of  burden  by  a  magic  potion  admin- 
istered in  the  cheese,  just  as  Circe  transformed  the  copi- 
panions  of  Ulysses  and  as  Apuleius  says  happened  to  him- 
self in  the  book  that  he  wrote  under  the  title,  The  Golden 
Ass.  These  stories,  in  Augustine's  opinion,  "are  either 
false  or  such  uncommon  occurrences  that  they  are  justly 
discredited,"  ^  He  does  not  believe  that  demons  can  truly 
transform  the  human  body  into  the  limbs  and  lineaments 
of  beasts,  but  the  strange  personal  experiences  of  reliable 
persons  have  convinced  him  that  men  are  deceived  by 
dreams,  hallucinations,  and  fantastic  images. 

Thus,  as  we  have  already  seen  over  and  over  again,  the  Its  fan- 
fantastic  and  deceptive  character  of  magic  is  dimly  realized,  character 
Usually,  however,  when  Augustine  represents  "the  powers 
of  the  air"  as  deceiving  men  by  magic,  the  deceit  consists 
merely  in  the  magicians'  imagining  that  they  are  working 
the  marvels  which  are  really  performed  by  demons,  or  in 
men  being  lured  into  subjection  to  Satan  and  to  their  ulti- 
mate and  eternal  damnation  through  the  attractions  of  the 
magic  art.^ 

Augustine  twice  responded  to  questions  concerning  the   Samuel 
witch  of  Endor's  apparent  invocation  of  the  spirit  of  Sam- 


*  De  trinttate,  III,  7-8.  It  seems 
strange  to  me  that  they  should 
have  failed  on  minute  insects  who 
in  ancient  and  medieval  science 
are  often  represented  as  produced 
by  spontaneous  generation.  The 
Talmudists  also,  however,  state 
that  the  Egyptians  were  unable  to 
duplicate  the  plague  of  lice,  as 
their  art  did  not  extend  to  things 
smaller  than  a  barleycorn. 


'De  civitate  Dei,  XVIII,  22. 
In  commenting  on  Genesis  (PL 
34,  445)  he  speaks  even  more 
harshly  of  "that  absurd  and  harm- 
ful notion  of  the  changing  of 
souls  and  of  men  into  beasts,  or 
of  beasts  into  men" ;  but  perhaps 
he  has  reference  to  the  doctrine  of 
transmigration  of  souls  rather 
than  to  magic  transformations. 

*  Confessions,  X,  42,  in  PL  vol. 
Z2. 


and  the 
witch  of 
Endor. 


Sio  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

uel,  repeating  in  his  De  octo  Dulcitii  quaestionibus  "^  what 
he  had  already  said  in  De  diversis  quaestionibus  ad  Sim- 
plicianum.^  In  certain  respects  Augustine's  treatment  of  the 
problem  differs  from  those  which  we  have  previously  ex- 
amined. What,  he  asks,  if  the  impure  spirit  which  possessed 
the  pythonissa  was  able  to  raise  the  very  soul  of  Samuel 
from  the  dead?  Is  it  not  much  more  strange  that  Satan 
was  allowed  to  converse  personally  with  God  concerning 
the  tempting  of  Job,  and  to  raise  the  very  Christ  aloft  upon 
a  pinnacle  of  the  temple?  Why  then  may  not  the  soul  of 
Samuel  have  appeared  to  Saul,  not  unwillingly  and  coerced 
by  magic  power  but  voluntarily  under  some  hidden  divine 
dispensation?  Augustine,  however,  also  thinks  it  possible 
that  the  soul  of  Samuel  did  not  appear  but  was  impersonated 
by  some  phantasm  and  imaginary  illusion  made  by  diabolical 
machinations.  He  can  see  no  deceit  in  the  Scripture's  call- 
ing such  a  phantom  Samuel,  since  we  are  accustomed  to  call 
paintings,  statues,  and  images  seen  in  dreams  by  the  names 
of  the  actual  persons  whom  they  represent.  Nor  does  it 
trouble  him  that  the  spirit  of  Samuel  or  pretended  spirit 
predicted  truly  to  Saul,  for  demons  have  a  limited  power  of 
that  sort.  Thus  they  recognized  Christ  when  the  Jews  knew 
Him  not,  and  the  damsel  possessed  of  a  spirit  of  divination 
in  The  Acts  testified  to  Paul's  divine  mission.  Augustine 
leaves,  however,  as  beyond  the  limits  of  his  time  and  strength 
the  further  problem  whether  the  human  soul  after  death  can 
be  so  evoked  by  magic  incantations  that  it  is  not  only  seen 
but  recognized  by  the  living.  In  his  answer  to  Dulcitius  he 
further  calls  attention  to  the  passage  in  Ecclesiasticus  (xlvi, 
23)  where  Samuel  is  praised  as  prophesying  from  the  dead. 
And  if  this  passage  be  rejected  because  the  book  is  not  in 
the  Hebrew  canon,  what  shall  we  say  of  Moses  who  ap- 
peared to  the  living  long  after  his  death? 

Augustine  had  some  acquaintance  with  ancient  natural 
science  and  in  one  passage  rehearses  a  number  of  natural 
marvels  which  are  found  in  the  pages  of  Pliny  and  Solinus 
*Qaaest.  VI;  PL  40,  162-5.  *II,  3;  PL  40,  142-4. 


XXII 


AUGUSTINE 


5" 


in  order  to  show  pagans  their  inconsistency  in  accepting 
such  wonders  and  yet  remaining  incredulous  in  regard  to 
analogous  phenomena  mentioned  in  the  Bible.  So  Augustine 
rehearses  the  strange  properties  of  the  magnet;  asserts  that 
adamant  can  be  broken  neither  by  steel  nor  fire  but  only 
by  application  of  the  blood  of  a  goat;  tells  of  Cappadocian 
mares  who  conceive  from  the  wind ;  and  hails  the  ability  of 
the  salamander  to  live  in  the  midst  of  flames  as  a  token 
that  the  bodies  of  sinners  can  subsist  in  hell  fire.  Augustine 
also  admits  "the  virtue  of  stones  and  other  objects  and  the 
craft  of  men  who  employ  these  in  marvelous  ways."  ■"■  He 
denies,  however,  that  the  Marsi  who  charm  snakes  by  their 
incantations  are  really  understood  by  the  serpents.  There 
is  some  diabolical  force  behind  their  magic,  as  when  Satan 
spoke  to  Eve  through  the  serpent.^ 

Once  at  least,  however,  Augustine  associates  science  and 
magic.  In  his  Confessions,  after  speaking  of  sensual  pleas- 
ure he  also  censures  "the  vain  and  curious  desire  of  investi- 
gation" through  the  senses,  which  is  "palliated  under  the 
name  of  knowledge  and  science."  This  is  apt  to  lead  one 
not  only  into  scrutinizing  secrets  of  nature  which  are  beyond 
one  and  which  it  does  one  no  good  to  know  and  which  men 
want  to  know  just  for  the  sake  of  knowledge,  but  also 
"into  searching  through  magic  arts  into  the  confines  of 
perverse  science."  ^ 

Of  this  dangerous  borderland  between  magic  and  science 
Augustine  has  more  to  say  in  some  chapters  of  his  Christian 
Doctrine.'^  After  mentioning  as  prime  instances  of  human 
superstition  idolatry,  other  false  religions,  and  the  magic 
arts,  he  next  lists  the  books  of  soothsayers  (aruspices)  and 
augurs  as  of  the  same  class,  "though  seemingly  a  more 
permissible  vanity."  In  his  Confessions,^  however,  he  tells 
of  a  soothsayer  who  offered  not  only  to  consult  the  future 
for  him,  but  to  insure  him  success  in  a  poetical  contest  in 


^De  civitate  Dei,  XXI,  4-6;  PL 

41,  712-6. 

'De  Genesi  ad  Utteram,  XI,  28- 
9;  PL  34,  444-5. 


•  Confessions,  X,  35 ;  in  PL  vol. 
32. 
*II,  20  and  29. 
•IV.  2-3. 


Relation 
between 
magic  and 
science. 


Super- 
stitions 
akin  to 
magic. 


512 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Curvival 
of  pagan 
super- 
stition 
among 
the  laity. 


which  he  was  to  engage  in  the  theater.  The  incident  is  a 
good  illustration  of  the  fact  that  prediction  of  the  future 
and  attempting  to  influence  events  go  naturally  together, 
and  that  arts  of  divination  cannot  be  separated  either  in 
theory  or  practice  from  magic  arts.  In  the  Christian  Doc- 
trine Augustine  is  inclined  further  to  put  in  the  same  class 
all  use  of  invocations,  incantations,  and  characters,  which 
he  regards  as  signs  implying  pacts  with  evil  spirits,  and 
the  use  of  which  in  working  cures  he  asserts  is  condemned 
by  the  medical  profession.  He  is  also  suspicious  of  ligatures 
and  suspensions,  and  states  that  it  is  one  thing  to  say,  "If 
you  drink  the  juice  of  this  herb,  your  stomach  will  not 
ache,"  and  is  another  thing  to  say,  "If  you  suspend  this 
herb  from  the  neck,  your  stomach  will  not  ache.  For  in 
one  case  a  healing  application  is  worthy  of  approval,  in 
the  other  a  superstitious  signification  is  to  be  censured." 
Augustine  recognizes,  however,  that  such  ligatures  and  sus- 
pensions are  called  "by  the  milder  name  of  natural  remedies 
(physica)" ;  and  if  they  are  applied  without  incantations 
or  characters,  possibly  they  may  heal  the  body  naturally  by 
mere  attachment,  in  which  case  it  is  lawful  to  employ  them. 
But  they  may  involve  some  signal  to  demons,  in  which  case 
the  more  efficacious  they  are,  the  more  a  Christian  should 
avoid  them. 

The  same  attitude  toward  superstitious  medicine  is 
shown  in  a  sermon  attributed  to  Augustine  but  probably 
spurious.^  Here  a  tempter  is  represented  as  coming  to 
the  sick  man  and  saying,  "If  you  had  only  employed  that 
enchanter,  you  would  be  well  now;  if  you  would  attach  these 
characters  to  your  body,  you  could  recover  your  health." 
Or  another  comes  and  says,  "Send  your  girdle  to  that 
diviner ;  he  will  measure  and  scrutinize  it  and  tell  you  what 
to  do  and  whether  you  can  recover.  Or  a  third  visitor  may 
recommend  someone  who  is  skilled  in  fumigation.  The 
preacher  warns  his  hearers  not  to  succumb  to  such  advice 
or  they  will  be  sacrificing  to  the  devil;  whereas  if  they  refuse 
'  PL  39,  2268-72. 


XXII 


AUGUSTINE 


513 


such  treatment  and  die,  it  will  be  a  glorious  martyr's  death. 
The  preacher,  however,  is  not  over-sanguine  that  his  advice 
will  be  heeded,  as  he  has  often  before  admonished  his  hearers 
against  pagan  superstitions,  and  yet  reports  keep  coming  to 
him  that  some  are  continuing  such  practices.  He  therefore 
"warns  them  again  and  again"  to  forsake  all  diviners, 
aruspices,  enchanters,  phylacteries,  augury,  and  observance 
of  days,  or  they  will  lose  all  benefit  of  the  sacrament  of 
baptism  and  will  be  eternally  damned  unless  they  perform 
a  vast  amount  of  penance.  The  observance  of  days  other 
than  the  Lord's  Day  is  here  condemned  on  the  ground  that 
God  made  the  other  six  days  without  distinction.  In  another 
supposititious  sermon  ^  the  practice  of  diligently  observing 
on  which  day  of  the  week  to  set  out  on  a  journey  is  censured 
as  equivalent  to  worshiping  the  planets,  or  rather  the  pagan 
gods  whose  names  they  bear  and  who  are  said  here  to  have 
originally  been  bad  men  and  women  who  lived  at  the  time 
that  the  Children  of  Israel  were  in  Egypt.  The  preacher  is 
even  opposed  to  naming  the  days  of  the  week  after  such 
persons  or  planets  and  exhorts  his  hearers  to  speak  simply 
of  the  first  day,  second  day,  and  so  on. 

Nor  will  Augustine,  to  return  to  his   remarks   in  the  Augus- 
Christian  Doctrine,^  exempt  "from  this  genus  of  pernicious   {^"k^upon 
superstition  those  who  are  called  genethliaci  from  their  con-   astrology. 
sideration  of  natal  days  and  now  are  also  popularly  termed 
mathematici."    He  holds  that  they  enslave  human  free  will 
by  predicting  a  man's  character  and  life  from  the  stars,  and 
that  their  art  is  a  presumptuous  and  fallacious  human  inven- 
tion, and  that  if  their  predictions  come  true,  this  is  due  either 
to  chance  or  to  demons  who  wish  to  confirm  mankind  in  its 
error.^     In  his  youth,  when  a  follower  of  the  Manichean 
sect,  Augustine  had  been  a  believer  in  astrology  and  thereby 
"sacrificed  himself  to  demons"  at  the  same  time  that,  owing 
to  his  Manichean  scruples  against  animal  sacrifice,  he  re- 
fused to  employ  a  haruspex.^     Perhaps  on  this  account  he 


^  Scrmo  CXXX,  PL  39,  2004-5. 
'11,  21-3;  PL  34,  S1-3. 


*  De  civitate  Dei,  V,  7. 

*  Confessions,  VII,  6. 


SH 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Fate  and 
free  will. 


felt  the  more  bound  to  warn  his  readers  against  astrology 
in  his  old  age.  He  often  attacks  the  casters  of  horoscopes 
in  his  works  and  especially  in  the  opening  chapters  of  the 
fifth  book  of  The  City  of  God,  on  which  we  may  center  our 
attention  as  being  a  rather  more  elaborate  discussion  than 
the  other  passages  and  including  almost  all  the  arguments 
which  he  advances  elsewhere.  These  arguments  are  not 
original  with  him,  but  his  presentation  of  them  was  perhaps 
better  known  in  the  middle  ages  than  any  other.^ 

The  objection  to  astrology  as  fatalistic  does  not  come 
with  the  best  grace  from  Augustine,  the  great  advocate  of 
divine  prescience  and  of  predestination,  and  in  his  discussion 
in  The  City  of  God  he  is  forced  to  recognize  this  fact.  He 
holds  that  the  world  is  not  governed  by  chance  or  by  fate, 
a  word  which  for  most  men  means  the  force  of  the  con- 
stellations, but  by  divine  providence.  He  starts  to  accuse 
the  astrologers  of  attributing  to  the  spotless  stars,  or  to  the 
God  whose  orders  the  stars  obediently  execute,  the  causing 
of  human  sin  and  evil ;  but  then  recognizes  that  the  astrolo- 
gers will  answer  that  the  stars  simply  signify  and  in  no  way 
cause  evil,  just  as  God  foresees  but  does  not  compel  human 
sinfulness. 

Thus  thwarted  in  his  attempt  to  show  that  the  astrologers 
enslave  the  human  will,  although  in  other  passages  he  still 
gives  us  to  understand  that  they  do,^  Augustine  adopts  an- 
other line  of  argument,  that  from  twins,  an  old  favorite, 
which  he  twists  first  one  way  and  then  another,  proposing 
to  the  astrologers  a  series  of  dilemmas  as  he  finds  them 
likely  to  escape  from  each  preceding  one.  He  seems  to 
have  been  much  impressed  by  the  thought  that  at  the  same 
instant  and  hence  with  the  same  horoscope  persons  were 
born  whose  subsequent  lives  and  characters  were  different. 
He  brings  forward  Esau  and  Jacob  as  examples,  and  states 
that  he  himself  has  known  of  twins  of  dissimilar  sex  and 


*  Unless  otherwise  noted,  the 
ensuing  arguments  are  found  in 
The  City  of  God,  V,  1-7. 

'De  Genesi  ad  litteram,  II,  17; 


PL  34,  278.  De  diversis  quaes- 
tionibus,  cap.  45 ;  PL  40,  28-9. 
Epistola  246;  PL  2)Z<  1061.  Ser- 
mo  109;  PL  38,  1027. 


XXII  AUGUSTINE  515 

life.  Moreover,  he  tells  us  in  his  Confessions  that  he  was 
finally  induced  to  abandon  his  study  of  the  books  of  the 
astrologers,  from  which  the  arguments  of  "Vindicianus,  a 
keen  old  man,  and  of  Nebridius,  a  youth  of  remarkable  in- 
tellect," had  failed  to  win  him,  by  hearing  from  another 
youth  that  his  father,  a  man  of  wealth  and  rank,  had  been 
born  at  precisely  the  same  moment  as  a  certain  wretched 
slave  on  the  estate.-^ 

But  the  astrologers  reply  that  even  twins  are  not  bom  Defense 
at  precisely  the  same  instant  and  do  not  have  the  same  astrolo- 
horoscope,  but  are  born  under  different  constellations,  so  gers. 
rapidly  do  the  heavens  revolve,  as  the  astrologer  Nigidius 
Figulus  neatly  illustrated  by  striking  a  rapidly  revolving 
potter's  wheel  two  successive  blows  as  quickly  as  he  could 
in  what  appeared  to  be  the  same  spot.  But  when  the  wheel 
was  stopped  and  examined,  the  two  marks  were  found  to 
be  far  apart.  Augustine's  counter  argument  is  that  if 
astrologers  must  take  into  account  such  small  intervals  of 
time,  their  observations  and  predictions  can  never  attain 
sufficient  accuracy  to  insure  correct  prediction;  and  that  if 
so  brief  an  instant  of  time  is  sufficient  to  alter  the  horo- 
scope totally,  then  twins  should  not  be  as  much  alike  as  they 
are  nor  have  as  much  in  common  as  they  do, — for  instance, 
falling  ill  and  recovering  simultaneously.  To  this  the 
astrologers  are  likely  to  respond  that  twins  are  alike  because 
conceived  at  the  same  instant,  but  somewhat  dissimilar  in 
their  life  because  of  the  difference  in  their  times  of  birth. 
Augustine  retorts  that  if  two  persons  conceived  simultane- 
ously in  the  same  womb  may  be  born  at  different  times  and 
have  different  fates  after  birth,  he  sees  no  reason  why  per- 
sons who  are  born  of  different  mothers  at  the  same  instant 
with  the  same  horoscope  may  not  die  at  different  dates  and 
lead  different  lives.  But  he  does  not  recognize  that  very 
likely  the  astrologers  would  agree  with  him  in  this,  since 
they  often  held  that  the  influence  of  the  stars  was  received 
variously  by  matter.  He  also  asks  why  a  certain  sage  is 
^Confessions,  IV,  2-3. 


Si6 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


said  to  have  selected  a  certain  hour  for  intercourse  with 
his  wife  in  order  to  beget  a  marvelous  son — possibly  an  in- 
accurate allusion  to  the  story  of  Nectanebus  ^ — unless  the 
hour  of  conception  controls  the  hour  of  birth,  and  conse- 
quently twins  conceived  together  must  have  the  same  horo- 
scope. He  also  objects  that  if  twins  fall  sick  at  the  same 
time  because  of  their  simultaneous  conception,  they  should 
not  be  of  opposite  sex  as  sometimes  happens. 
Elections.  With  this  Augustine  turns  from  the  case  of  twins  to 

urge  the  inconsistency  of  the  astrological  doctrine  of  elec- 
tions, suggested  by  the  story  of  the  sage  who  chose  the 
favorable  moment  for  intercourse  with  his  wife.  He  holds 
that  this  practice  of  choosing  favorable  times  is  inconsistent 
with  the  belief  in  nativities  which  are  supposed  to  have  de- 
termined and  predicted  the  individual's  fate  already.  He 
also  inquires  why  men  choose  certain  days  for  setting  out 
trees  and  shrubs  or  breeding  animals,  if  men  alone  are  sub- 
ject to  the  constellations. 

This  last  clause  indicates  how  exclusively  Augustine's 
attacks  are  directed  against  the  prediction  of  man's  life  from 
the  stars,  and  how  little  he  has  to  say  regarding  the  stars' 
control  of  the  world  of  nature  in  general.  He  now  goes 
on  to  consider  this  latter  possibility,  but  interprets  it  too  in 
the  narrow  sense  of  horoscope-casting,  and  as  implying  that 
every  herb  and  beast  must  have  its  fate  absolutely  deter- 
mined by  the  constellations  at  its  moment  of  birth.  This 
appears,  however,  to  have  been  a  widespread  belief  then, 
since  he  tells  us  that  men  are  accustomed  to  test  the  skill 
of  astrologers  by  submitting  to  them  the  horoscopes  of 
dumb  animals,  and  that  the  best  astrologers  are  able  not 
only  to  recognize  that  the  reported  constellations  mark  the 
birth  of  a  beast  rather  than  that  of  a  human  being,  but  also 
to  state  whether  it  was  a  horse,  cow,  dog,  or  sheep.  Never- 
theless, Augustine  feels  that  he  has  reduced  the  art  of  cast- 
ing horoscopes  to  an  absurdity,  as  he  feels  sure  that  beasts 
and  plants  which  are  so  numerous  must  frequently  be  born 

*  See  below,   chapter  24. 


XXII 


AUGUSTINE 


517 


disprove 
the  control 
of  nature 
by  the 
stars. 


at  precisely  the  same  instant  as  human  beings.  Further- 
more, it  is  plain  that  crops  which  are  sown  and  ripen  simul- 
taneously meet  with  very  diverse  fates  in  the  end.  Augus- 
tine thinks  that  by  this  argument  he  will  force  the  astrologers 
to  say  that  men  alone  are  subject  to  the  stars,  and  then  he 
will  triumphantly  ask  how  this  can  be,  when  God  has  en- 
dowed man  alone  of  all  creatures  with  free  will.  Having 
thus  argued  more  or  less  in  a  circle,  Augustine  regains  the 
point  from  which  he  had  started,  or  rather,  retreated, 

Augustine  cannot  then  be  said  to  have  advanced  any  Failure  to 
telling  arguments  against  some  sort  of  control  of  inferior 
nature  by  the  motions  and  influence  of  the  heavenly  bodies. 
He  leaves  the  fundamental  hypothesis  of  astrology  unre- 
butted.  His  attention  is  concentrated  upon  genethlialogy, 
the  superstition  that  the  time  and  place  of  birth  and  nothing 
else  determine  with  mathematical  certainty  and  mechanical 
rigidity  the  entirety  of  one's  life.  This  seems  nevertheless 
to  have  been  a  superstition  which  was  very  much  alive  in 
his  time,  which  he  felt  he  must  take  pains  repeatedly  to 
refute,  and  to  which  he  himself  had  once  been  in  bondage. 
But  he  could  not  have  studied  the  books  of  the  astrologers 
very  deeply,  as  he  ascribes  views  to  them  which  many  of 
them  did  not  hold.  Also  he  seems  never  to  have  read  the 
Tetrabihlos  of  Ptolemy.  His  attack  upon  and  criticism 
of  astrology  was  therefore  narrow,  partial,  and  inadequate, 
and  did  not  prevent  medieval  men  from  devoting  them- 
selves to  that  subject,  although  they  might  cite  his  objec- 
tions against  ascribing  to  the  constellations  an  influence 
subversive  of  human  free  will.  But  he  cannot  be  said  to 
have  admitted  the  control  of  the  stars  over  the  world  of 
nature.  Apparently  the  most  that  he  was  willing  to  con- 
cede was  that  it  was  not  absurd  to  say  that  the  influence  of 
the  stars  might  produce  changes  in  material  things,  as  in  the 
varying  seasons  of  the  year  caused  by  the  sun's  course  and 
the  alternating  augmentation  and  diminution  of  tides  and 
shell-fish  due,  as  he  supposed,  to  the  moon's  phases.  He 
concludes  his  discns?ion  of  the  subject  in  The  Citv  of  God 


5i8 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Natural 

divination 

and 

prophetic 

visions. 


by  saying  that,  all  things  considered,  if  the  astrologers  make 
many  marvelously  true  predictions,  they  do  so  by  the  aid 
and  inspiration  of  the  demons  and  not  by  the  art  of  noting 
and  inspecting  horoscopes,  which  has  no  sound  basis. 

In  another  work  Augustine  tells  of  some  young  men 
who,  while  traveling,  as  a  boyish  prank  pretended  to  be 
astrologers  and  either  by  mere  chance  or  by  natural  and 
innate  power  of  divination  hit  upon  the  truth  in  the  predic- 
tions which  they  supposed  that  they  were  inventing.  In 
the  same  context  he  proceeds  to  discuss  in  a  credulous  way 
the  possibility  of  marvelous  prophetic  visions,  concerning 
which  he  tells  one  or  two  other  tall  tales  from  his  personal 
experience.  He  is,  however,  doubtful  how  far  the  human 
soul  itself  possesses  the  power  of  divination,  which  he  is 
inclined  to  attribute  rather  to  spirits,  good  or  bad.  But 
owing  to  Satan's  ability  in  disguising  himself  as  an  angel 
of  light  it  is  often  very  difficult  to  tell  to  which  sort  of 
spirit  to  ascribe  the  vision  in  question.^ 

In  Augustine's  time  there  were  those  who  held  that 
Christ  Himself  had  been  "born  under  the  decree  of  the 
stars,"  because  of  the  statement  in  the  Gospel  according  to 
Matthew  that  the  Magi  had  seen  His  star  in  the  east.  Of 
this  matter  Augustine  treats  in  several  of  his  works. ^  He 
denies  that  this  would  be  true  even  if  other  men  were  subject 
to  the  fatal  influence  of  the  stars,  which  he  denies  as  usual 
on  the  ground  of  free  will.  He  contends  that  the  star  was 
not  one  of  the  planets  or  constellations  but  a  special  crea- 
tion, since  it  did  not  keep  to  a  regular  course  or  orbit,  but 
came  to  where  the  child  lay.  But  how  did  the  Magi  know 
that  it  was  the  star  of  Christ  when  they  saw  it  in  the  east, 
unless  by  astrology?  Augustine  can  only  suggest  that  this 
was  revealed  to  them  by  spirits,  whether  good  or  bad  he  does 
not  know.^    Augustine  further  affirms  that  the  star  did  not 

^De    Genesi   ad    litteram,    XII,  '  Sermones  199  and  374;  PL  38, 

22  and   17  and  12;   PL  34,  472-3,  1027-8,     and     39,     1666.      Contra 

467-9,  464-5.    See  also  the  marvel-  Faustum,  II,  15 ;  PL  42,  212. 

ous  divinations  of   Albicerius   re-  '  In  Quaestiones  ex  Novo   Tes- 

counted  in  Contra  AcademicoSj  1,  tamento,  Quaest.  63,  PL  35,  2258, 

6;  PL  32,  914-5.  which     is     probably     a     spurious 


XXII 


AUGUSTINE 


519 


cause  Christ  to  live  a  marvelous  life,  but  Christ  caused  the 
star  to  make  its  marvelous  appearance.  "For,  when  born 
of  a  mother,  He  showed  earth  a  new  star  in  the  sky,  Who, 
when  born  of  the  Father,  formed  both  heaven  and  earth." 
And,  "when  He  is  bom,  new  light  is  revealed  in  a  star; 
when  He  dies,  old  light  is  veiled  in  the  sun."  But  these 
rhetorical  flourishes  and  antitheses  seem  to  attest  rather 
than  dispute  the  significance  of  celestial  phenomena,  so 
that  Augustine  cannot  be  said  to  have  answered  the 
astrological  contention  anent  Christ's  birth  very  satisfac- 
torily. 

The  problem  of  the  nature  of  the  stars  is  one  which  Nature  of 
Augustine  prefers  to  leave  unsolved,  although  it  comes  up  ^^^^^' 
several  times  in  his  writings.^  Whether  they  are  simply 
lucid  bodies  without  sense  or  intelligence,  as  some  think; 
or  have  happy  intellectual  souls  of  their  own,  as  Plato 
taught;  whether  they  are  to  be  classed  with  the  Seats, 
Dominions,  Principalities,  and  Powers  of  whom  the 
apostle  speaks;  and  whether  they  are  ruled  and  animated 
by  spirits :  all  these  are  questions  which  Augustine  puts,  but 
concerning  whose  answers  he  feels  uncertain.  His  fullest 
discussion  of  the  matter  is  in  a  letter  against  the  Priscillian- 
ists  to  which  we  now  come. 

An  interchange  of  letters  between  Augustine  and  his   Orosius 
Spanish  disciple  Orosius  deals  with  the  error  of  the  Pris-   p".*^^ 
cillianists  and  Origenists.^    Nothing  is  said  to  convict  them   lianists 
of  magic,  which  was,  however,  the  charge  on  which  Pris-  genists.~ 

work  but  was  cited  as  Augustine's 
by  Thomas  Aquinas  {Sunima, 
III,  36,  v),  Balaam  is  said  to 
have  warned  the  Magi  to  watch 
for  the  star.  It  is  also  asserted, 
however,  that  "these  Chaldean 
Magi  watched  the  course  of  the 
stars,  not  from  malevolence,  but 
curiosity  concerning  nature"  (Hi 
Magi  chaldaei  non  malevolentia 
astrorum  cursum  sed  rerum  curi- 
ositate  speculabantur). 

^Enchiridion,  sive  de  fide,  spe, 
et  charitate,  I,  58;  PL  40,  259-60. 
De  civitate  Dei,  XIII,  16;  PL  41, 


388.     De   Gene  si  ad  litteram,  II, 
18;  PL  34,  279-80. 

'  Orosii  ad  Augustinum  Consul- 
tatio  sive  C  ommonitorium  de 
errore  Priscillianistarutn  et  Ori- 
genistarum,  PL  31,  1211-22;  also 
in  G.  Schepss  (1889),  in  CSEL 
XVIII.  Augustini  ad  Orosium 
contra  Priscillianistas  et  Origenis- 
tas,  PL  41,  669,  et  scq.  Augustine 
also  discusses  the  Priscillianists  in 
Epistle  237,  PL  33,  1034,  et  seq., 
where  he  makes  no  charge  either 
of  magic  or  astrology  against 
them. 


520  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

cillian  was  put  to  death,  but  astrological  tenets  are  ascribed 
to  them.  Orosius  states  that  Priscillian  taught  that  the  soul 
was  born  of  God  and  instructed  by  angels,  but  that  it  de- 
scended through  certain  circles  of  the  heavens  and  was 
caught  by  evil  principalities  and  thrust  into  different  bodies; 
and  that  it  remained  subject  to  Mathesis  or  the  laws  of 
astrology  until  Christ  set  it  free  by  His  passion  on  the  cross. 
Like  the  astrologers,  continues  Orosius,  Priscillian  associated 
the  signs  of  the  zodiac  with  the  different  members  of  the 
human  body,  Aries  and  the  head,  Taurus  and  the  neck,  and 
so  on ;  ^  and  he  also  taught  that  the  names  of  the  patriarchs 
of  the  twelve  tribes  were  "members  of  the  soul,"  Reuben 
in  the  head,  Judah  in  the  breast,  Levi  in  the  heart,  and  so 
on.  Orosius  adds  that  the  Origenists  regard  the  sun,  moon, 
and  stars  not  as  elemental  luminaries  but  as  rational  powers ; 
and  we  have  seen  that  Origen  himself  did  so. 

Augustine  in  his  reply  states  that  we  can  see  that  the 
sun,  moon,  and  stars  are  celestial  bodies,  but  not  that  they 
are  animated.  He  agrees  firmly  with  Paul  that  there  are 
Seats,  Dominions,  Principalities,  and  Powers  in  the  heavens, 
"but  I  do  not  know  what  they  are  or  what  the  difference 
is  between  them."  On  the  whole,  Augustine  is  inclined  to 
regard  this  state  of  ignorance  as  a  blissful  one.  He  is  some- 
what troubled  by  the  verses  in  the  Book  of  Job,  "How 
shall  man  be  just  in  the  sight  of  God,  or  how  shall  one  born 
of  woman  purify  himself?  If  He  commands  the  moon  and 
it  does  not  shine,  and  if  the  stars  are  not  pure  before  Him, 
how  much  more  is  man  rottenness  and  the  son  of  man  a 
worm?"  From  this  passage  the  Priscillianists  infer  that 
the  stars  have  a  rational  spirit  and  are  not  free  from  sin, 
yet  are  placed  in  the  heaven  because  their  fault  is  less  than 
that  of  sinful  mankind.  Origen  too  had  argued,  "H  the 
stars  are  living  and  rational  beings,  there  will  undoubtedly 
appear  among  them  both  an  advance  and  a  falling  back. 
For  the  language  of  Job,  'the  stars  are  not  clean  in  His 

*This  charge  was  later  repeated  by  St.  Leo,  Epistola  XV;  see  With- 
ington,  History  of  Medicine,  1894,  p.  178;  but  the  offense  would  seem 
a  trivial  one  in  any  case. 


XXII 


AUGUSTINE 


521 


sight,'  seems  to  me  to  convey  some  such  idea."  *  Augustine 
evades  this  difficulty  by  questioning  whether  this  passage  is 
to  be  received  as  of  divine  authority,  since  it  is  uttered  by 
one  of  Job's  comforters  and  not  by  Job  himself,  of  whom 
alone  it  is  said  that  he  had  not  sinned  with  his  lips  against 
God. 

So  set  is  Augustine  against  astrology  that  he  even  holds  Attitude 
that  Christians  may  well  leave  the  subject  of  astronomy  astron- 
alone,  "because  it  is  related  to  the  most  pernicious  error  of  omy. 
those  who  utter  a  fatuous  fatalism,"  although  he  recognizes 
that  there  is  nothing  superstitious  in  predicting  the  future 
positions  of  the  stars  themselves  from  knowledge  of  their 
past  movements.  But  except  that  to  know  the  course  of  the 
moon  is  useful  in  determining  the  date  of  Easter,  knowl- 
edge of  the  stars  is  of  little  or  no  help  in  interpreting  the 
divine  Scriptures.^  In  another  passage  Augustine  is  some- 
what perturbed  by  the  assertion  of  astronomers  that  there 
are  many  stars  equal  to  or  greater  than  the  sun  in  size,  but 
which  seem  smaller  because  they  are  farther  off, — an  asser- 
tion which  seems  to  conflict  with  the  statement  of  Genesis 
that  in  creating  the  sun  and  moon  "God  made  two  great 
lights."  Augustine,  however,  does  not  stop  to  contest  the 
point  at  length  but  leaves  it  with  the  excuse  that  Christians 
have  many  better  and  more  serious  matters  to  occupy  their 
time  than  such  subtle  investigations  concerning  the  relative 
magnitude  of  the  stars  and  the  intervals  of  space  between 
them.^ 

Augustine  himself,  however,  was  not  above  occupying  Perfect 
his  readers'  time  with  discussion  of  the  occult  significance  "umbers, 
of  numbers,  towards  belief  in  which  he  shows  himself  in- 
clined. Six  was  a  perfect  number  in  his  estimation,  since 
God  had  created  the  world  in  six  days,  although  He  might 
have  taken  less  or  more  time ;  and  the  Psalmist  made  no  idle 
remark  in  saying  that  the  Deity  had  ordered  all  things  ac- 


^De  principiis,  I,  7. 
'  De  doctrina  Christiana,  II,  29, 
in  Migne,  34,  57- 


*De  Genesi  ad  litteram,  II,   16, 
in  Migne,  34,  277. 


522       MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE   chap.xxii 

cording  to  measure,  number,  and  weight.  Also  six  is  the 
first  number  which  can  be  obtained  from  adding  together 
its  factors:  one,  two,  and  three.  Augustine  was  going  on 
to  say  that  seven  was  also  a  perfect  number,  when  he 
checked  himself  lest  he  digress  at  too  great  length  and  seem 
"too  eager  to  display  his  smattering  of  science."  Hence  he 
merely  added  that  one  indication  of  seven's  perfection  was 
its  composition  of  the  first  complete  odd  number,  three,  and 
the  first  complete  even  number,  four.^  It  is  therefore  not 
surprising  to  find  ascribed  to  Augustine  a  sermon  on  the  cor- 
respondence between  the  ten  plagues  of  Egypt  and  the  ten 
commandments  which  opens  by  remarking  that  it  is  not  with- 
out cause  that  the  number  of  precepts  in  God's  law  is  the 
same  as  the  number  of  plagues  with  which  Egypt  was  af- 
flicted.2 

^De  civitate  Dei,  XI,  30-31.  He  et  decern  plagarum  Egypti,    Non 

says  about  the  same  things  con-  est  sine  causa,  fratres  dilectissimi, 

cerning     six    and    seven    in    De  quod      preceptorum      legis      Dei 

Genesi  ad  litteram,  IV,  2.  numerus    cum    numero    jplagarum 

'  Sermo     supposititius     21,     in  quibus    Aegyptus    percutitur    ex- 

Migne,    PL    XXXIX,    1783,    "De  aequari  videtur." 
convenientia    decern    preceptorum 


CHAPTER  XXIII 

THE  FUSION   OF   PAGAN   AND   CHRISTIAN   THOUGHT   IN   THE 
FOURTH  AND  FIFTH  CENTURIES 

Need  of  qualifying  the  patristic  attitude — Plan  of  this  chapter — 
Julius  Firmicus  Maternus — Date  of  the  Mathesis — Are  the  attitudes  in 
Firmicus'  two  works  incompatible? — De  errore  is  not  unfavorable  to 
astrology — Attitude  of  both  works  to  the  emperors — Religious  attitude 
of  the  Mathesis — An  astrologer's  prayer — Christian  objections  to  as- 
trology met — Astrology  proved  experimentally — Information  to  be 
gained  from  the  third  and  fourth  books — Religion  and  magic;  exorcists 
— Divination — Magic  as  a  branch  of  learning — Interest  in  science — 
Diseases  in  antiquity — Place  of  Firmicus  in  the  history  of  astrology — 
Libanius  accused  of  magic — Declamation  against  a  magician — Faith  of 
Libanius  in  divination — Magic  and  astrology  in  Pseudo-Quintilian  dec- 
lamations— Fusion  of  Christianity  and  paganism  in  Synesius  of  Cyrene 
— His  career — His  interest  in  science — Belief  in  occult  sympathy  be- 
tween natural  objects — Synesius  on  divination  and  astrology — Synesius 
as  an  alchemist — Macrobius  on  number,  dreams,  and  stars — Martianus 
Capella — Absence  of  astrology — Orders  of  spirits — The  Celestial 
Hierarchy  of  Dionysius  the  Areopagite. 

In  reading  the  writings  of  the  Christian   fathers  one  is   Need  of 
impressed  by  the  fact  that  their  tone  is  almost  invariably  Jj^^^"y*"S 
that  of  the  preacher.     In  estimating  therefore  the  practical   patristic 
effect  of  their  utterances  it  is  well  to  remember  that  these 
are  counsels  of  perfection  which  were  probably  often  not 
realized  even  by  those  who  gave  utterance  to  them.    This  is 
not  to  accuse  the  fathers  of  being  pharisaical,  but  to  sug- 
gest that  as  both  clerics  and  apologists  they  were  profession- 
ally bound  to  take  up  an  irreproachable  position  morally  and 
dogmatically.     Basil  has  shown  us  that  the  audience  who 
listened  to  his  sermons  were  still  under  the  spell  of  Roman 
amusements,  dice,  theater,  and  arena.    And  the  average  lay 
Christian  mind  was  probably  more  easy-going  in  its  attitude 
toward  magic  and  superstition  than  Augustine.    Not  merely 

523 


524  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

laymen,  moreover,  but  Christian  clergy  and  apologists  of 
the  declining  Roman  Empire  might  still  hold  to  divination 
and  astrology.  It  was  a  time,  as  has  often  been  remarked, 
of  religious  syncretism,  of  fusion  of  pagan  and  Christian 
thought,  when  it  is  not  always  easy  to  tell  whether  the  author 
of  an  extant  writing  is  Christian  or  Neo-Platonist  or  both. 
Mr.  Gwatkin  states  that  "the  surface  thought"  of  Con- 
stantine's  time,  "Christian  as  well  as  heathen,  tended  to  a 
vague  monotheism  which  looked  on  Christ  and  the  sun  as 
almost  equally  good  symbols  of  the  Supreme."  ^  Others 
believed  that  astrology  was  the  truth  back  of  all  religions.^ 

In  this  chapter  we  shall  therefore  consider  some  writers 
of  the  fourth  and  fifth  century  who  attest  the  existence  of 
magic  and  astrology  then,  the  influence  of  paganism  on 
Christianity  and  of  Christianity  on  paganism,  and  the  fu- 
sion of  Neo-Platonism,  Christianity,  and  astrological  the- 
ory. This,  indeed,  we  have  already  done  to  some  extent,  as 
our  previous  chapters  on  Neo-Platonism  and  on  the  Chris- 
tian fathers  have  carried  us  more  or  less  into  those  cen- 
turies. But  now  as  an  offset  to  Augustine  we  take  up  other 
writers  who  have  not  yet  been  treated :  Firmicus,  the  Latin 
Christian  apologist  and  the  astrologer  of  the  mid- fourth 
century;  Libanius,  the  Greek  sophist  of  the  same  century; 
Macrobius  and  Synesius,  Neo-Platonists  writing  respectively 
in  Latin  and  Greek  at  the  beginning  of  the  fifth  century, 
and  of  whom  one  was  a  Christian  bishop;  and  probably  in 
the  same  century  the  discussion  of  spirits  by  Martianus  Ca- 
pella  in  Latin  and  the  Pseudo-Dionysius  the  Areopagite  in 
Greek.  Except  for  Libanius  and  Synesius,  these  authors 
were  very  influential  in  medieval  Latin  learning  and  might 
serve  as  well  for  an  introduction  to  our  following  book  on 
The  Early  Middle  Ages  as  for  a  conclusion  to  this. 

^Cambridge    Medieval   History,  in  astrology  at  this  period,  since 

I^  g.  F.  Boll,  Heidelherger  Akad.  Sitsb., 

''The    Greek   work,   Hermippus  1912,  No.  18,  has  shown  it  to  be  a 

or    Concerning    Astrology,    how-  fourteenth  century  work  of  John 

ever,   can   no  longer  be  regarded  Katrarios,   who   makes   use   of   a 

as  an  example  of  Christian  belief  Greek  translation  of  Albumasar. 


XXIII  PAGAN  AND  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT  525 

Julius  Firmlcus  Maternus  ^  flourished  during  the  reigns  Julius 
of  Constantine  the  Great  and  his  sons.  Sicily  was  his  native  Maternus 
land;  he  was  of  senatorial  rank  and  very  well  educated  for 
his  time,  showing  interest  in  natural  philosophy,  literature, 
and  rhetoric.  Two  works  are  extant  under  his  name :  one. 
On  the  Error  of  Profane  Religions,^  is  addressed  to  Con- 
stantius  and  Constans,  340-350  A.  D.,  and  urges  them  to 
eradicate  pagan  cults.  The  other,  Mathesis,^  is  a  work  of 
astrology  written  at  the  request  of  a  similarly  cultured 
friend,  Lollianus  or  Mavortius,  who  is  spoken  of  in  the 
preface  as  ordinario  considi  designato,'^  an  office  which  we 
know  that  he  held  in  355  A.  D.  The  writing  of  two  such 
works  by  one  man  has  long  given  critics  pause,  and  is  a 
splendid  warning  against  taking  anything  for  granted  in 
our  study  of  the  past.  Not  long  ago  the  general  opinion 
was  that  there  must  have  been  two  different  authors  by  the 
name  of  Firmicus.  This  very  unlikely  theory  has  now  been 
universally  abandoned,  as  unmistakable  similarities  in  style 
and  wording  have  been  noted  in  the  two  works.  But  it  is 
still  maintained  that  "there  is  no  question  but  that  he  was  a 
pagan  when  he  wrote  his  astrological  book."  ^  This  in- 
volves two  considerations,  whether  the  attitude  expressed  in 

*  For  bibliography  see  F.  Boll's  noted.     Earlier  editions,   which   I 

"Firmicus"   in   PW.     It  does   not  used    for   the   later   books   before 

include  my  article  written  subse-  1913,     are     the     editio     princeps, 

quently  on  "A  Roman  Astrologer  Julius   Firmicus    de    nativitatibus, 

as    a    Historical    Source :    Julius  .  .  ,  Impressum   Venetiis  per  Sy- 

Firmicus   Maternus,"   in   Classical  monem    papienscm    dictum    bivi- 

Pkilology,   VIII,    No.  4,   pp.  415-  laqua,     1497    die     13    lunii,    cxv 

35,    October,    1913.      For    bibliog-  fols. ;   the  Aldine  edition   of    1499 

raphy  see  also   Kroll  et   Skutsch,  containing  apparent  interpolations, 

II,  xxxiv.  Julii      Firmici      Astronomicorum 

'The  edition  of  De  errore  pro-  libri   octo  integri  et   emendati   ex 

fanarum  religionum  by  K.  Ziegler,  Scythicis    oris    ad    nos    niiper   al- 

Leipzig,  1907,  is  more  critical  than  lati  .  .  .";   and  the  Basel  editions 

that  in  Migne,  PL.  of  1533  and  1551  by  M.  Pruckner 

^  lulii   Firmici   Materni   Mathe-  which  reproduce  the  Aldine  text. 

seos  Libri  VIII,  ed.  W.  Kroll  et  See  Kroll  et   Skutsch,   II,  xxxiii, 

F.      Skutsch,      Fasciculus      prior  for   another   reproduction   of   the 

libros      IV      prior es      et      quinti  Aldine  text,  printed  in   1503,  and 

prooemium      continens,      Leipzig,  p.  xxviii   for  a  partial  edition  of 

1897;    Fasciculus   alter   libros   IV  books  3-5  of  the  Mathesis  in  1488 

posteriores     cum     praefatione     et  and     1494     in     Opus     Astrolabii 

indicibus     continens,     1913.       My  plani  ...  a  lohanne  Angeli. 

references    will    be   by   page   and  *  Kroll  et  Skutsch,  I,  3,  27. 

line  to  this  text,  unless  otherwise  *  Boll  in  PW,  VI,  2365. 


526  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

the  two  works  Is  really  incompatible  and  whether  the  Ma- 
thesis  was  written  before  or  after  the  De  err  ore. 

Mommsen  contended  that  "it  is  beyond  doubt"  *  that  the 
Mathesis  was  written  between  334  and  337  A.  D.,  relying 
chiefly  upon  several  apparent  mentions  of  Constantine  the 
Great  as  still  living.  The  names,  Constantine  and  Constan- 
tius  are  frequently  confused  in  the  sources,  however,^  and 
even  while  the  words,  "Constantinuni  maximum  principem 
et  huius  invictissimos  liheros,  domines  et  Caesares  nostras," 
seem  to  refer  unmistakably  to  Constantine,  it  must  be  re- 
membered that  they  occur  in  a  prayer  to  the  planets  and  to 
the  supreme  God  that  Constantine  and  his  children  may  "rule 
over  our  posterity  and  the  posterity  of  our  posterity  through 
infinite  succession  of  ages."  As  this  is  simply  equivalent 
to  expressing  a  hope  that  the  dynasty  may  never  become 
extinct,  it  is  scarcely  proof  positive  that  Constantine  the 
Great  was  still  living  when  Firmicus  published  his  book. 
On  the  other  hand,  to  maintain  the  early  date  Mommsen  was 
forced  to  treat  the  mention  of  Lollianus  as  ordinario  con- 
suli  designato  as  mere  prophetic  flattery  or  as  an  appoint- 
ment held  up  by  Constantius  for  eighteen  years.  We  know 
that  Firmicus  addressed  the  De  errore  to  Constantius  and 
Constans,  probably  between  345  and  350;  we  know  that 
Lollianus  was  city  prefect  of  Rome  in  342,  consid  ordinarius 
in  355,  and  praetorian  prefect  in  the  following  year;  whereas 
we  know  nothing  certainly  of  either  of  them  before  337. 
Furthermore  Firmicus  explicitly  states  that  the  writing  of 
the  Mathesis  has  been  long  delayed,^  and  when  the  promise 
to  compose  it  was  first  made,  it  is  evident  that  neither  he 
nor  Lollianus  was  a  young  man.  Lollianus  was  already 
consularis  of  Campania  and  according  to  inscriptions  had 

^Hermes,   XXIX,   468-72.     The  Constantini  Ulius,"  might  as  well 

treatise  could  not  have  been  com-  be  rendered,  "Constantius,  son_  of 

posed   before   334    since    Firmicus  Constantine,"      as      "Constantine, 

(I,  13,  23)   refers  to  an  eclipse  in  son  of  Constantius." 

the    consulship    of     Optatus    and  M,  i,  3,  "Olim  tibi  hos  libellos, 

Paulinus   which   occurred   in  that  Mavorti  decus  nostrum,  me  dica- 

year.  turum  esse  promiseram  verum  diu 

'  For  instance,  at  I,  37,  25,  "Con-  me  inconstantia  verecundiae  retar- 

stantinus    scilicet    maximus    divi  davit." 


XXIII  PAGAN  AND  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT  527 

previously  held  a  number  of  other  offices ;  while  still  in  this 
position  Lollianus  had  frequently  to  spur  his  friend  on  to 
the  task  which  Firmicus  as  frequently  "gave  up  in  despair." 
Then  Lollianus  became  Count  of  all  the  Orient  and  con- 
tinued his  importunities.  Finally,  after  Lollianus  has  be- 
come proconsul  and  ordinary  consul  elect,  Firmicus  com- 
pletes the  work  and  presents  it  to  him.  Meanwhile 
Firmicus  himself — who  had  formerly  "resisted  with  un- 
bending confidence  and  firmness"  factious  and  wicked  and 
avaricious  men,  "who  from  fear  of  law-suits  seemed  ter- 
rible to  the  unfortunate";  and  who  "with  liberal  mind,  de- 
spising forensic  gains,  to  men  in  trouble  .  .  .  displayed  a 
pure  and  faithful  defense  in  the  courts  of  law,"  by  which 
upright  conduct  he  incurred  much  enmity  and  danger ;  ^ — has 
retired  from  the  sordid  sphere  of  law  courts  and  forum 
to  spend  his  leisure  with  the  divine  men  of  old  of  Egypt 
and  Babylon  and  to  purify  his  spirit  by  contemplation  of 
the  everlasting  stars  and  of  the  God  who  works  through 
them.  Yet  we  are  asked  to  believe — if  we  accept  a  date  be- 
fore 337  for  the  Mathesis — not  merely  that  he  writes  a 
vehement  invective  against  "profane  religions"  a  decade 
later,  but  also  that  twenty  years  after  Lollianus  is  still  a 
vigorous  administrator.^    It  is  possible,  but  seems  unlikely. 

Certainly  the  date  of  the  Mathesis  should  be  determined   Are  the 
without  any  assumption  as  to  what  Firmicus'  religion  was   ^ttitudes 
when  he  wrote  it.    For,  if  we  regard  his  attitudes  in  Mathe-  micus'two 
sis  and  De  errore  as  incompatible,  it  will  be  as  difficult  to   jncom- 
explain  how  he  could  write  the  De  errore  after  having  com-   patible? 
posed  the  Mathesis  as  vice  versa.     After  the  steadfast  af- 
firmation of  astrological  principles  in  the  Mathesis  it  is  no 
easier  to  explain  the  fierce  spirit  of  intolerance  toward  pa- 
ganism in  the  De  errore  than  it  is  after  the  mention  of  Christ 
in  the  De  errore  to  explain  the  omission  of  that  name  in  the 
Mathesis.    But  are  the  two  works  really  incompatible  ?    My 
answer  is,  No.     The  divergences  are  such  as  may  be  ex- 

*  I,  195-6.  praefectus  praetorio,  vir   sublimis 

*  Ammianus    Marcellinus,    XVI,      constantiae,    crimen    acri    inquis- 
8,    5,    "iubetur    Mavortius,    tunc      itione  spectari." 


528 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


plained  by  the  different  character  of  the  two  works  and 
the  different  circumstances  under  which  they  were  written. 
De  errore  is  an  impassioned  polemic  very  possibly  delivered 
as  an  oration  before  the  emperors;  Mathesis  is  a  learned 
compilation  on  a  pseudo-scientific  subject  composed  at  lei- 
sure for  a  friend  with  the  help  of  previous  treatises  on  the 
subject.  Why  should  Firmicus  mention  Christ  in  the  Ma- 
thesis? Does  Boethius,  after  nearly  two  centuries  more  of 
Christian  growth  and  although  he  wrote  a  work  on  the 
Trinity,  mention  Christ  in  The  Consolation  of  Philosophy? 
Some  apparent  petty  inconsistencies  there  may  be  between 
Firmicus'  two  works,  but  if  we  accept  a  host  of  contradic- 
tions in  Constantine  the  Great,  the  first  Christian  emperor, 
why  balk  at  some  inconsistency  in  a  writer  who  urges  Con- 
stantine's  children  against  profane  cults?  On  the  other 
hand,  there  are  some  striking  correspondences  between  the 
De  errore  and  Mathesis. 

It  is  noteworthy  in  the  first  place  that  in  the  De  errore 
Firmicus  does  not  attack  astrology.  But  if  he  had  been  con- 
verted to  Christianity  since  writing  the  Mathesis  and  had 
abandoned  the  astrological  doctrine  there  expounded,  would 
he  have  failed  to  attack  the  error  of  that  art  like  Augustine 
who  testified  that  he  had  once  believed  in  nativities?  It  is 
therefore  obvious  that  Firmicus  does  not  regard  astrology 
as  an  error  even  at  the  time  when  he  is  penning  the  De  errore 
as  a  Christian  apologist.  Moreover,  his  view  of  nature  in 
the  De  errore  is  quite  in  accord  with  that  of  the  astrologer, 
and  he  manifests  the  respect  for  natural  science  or  physica 
ratio  which  one  would  expect  from  the  author  of  the  Ma- 
thesis. Thus  we  find  him  criticizing  certain  pagan  cults  as 
sharply  for  their  incorrect  physical  notions  as  he  does  others 
for  travestying  Christian  mysteries.  In  its  opening  chapters 
certain  oriental  religions  are  criticized  for  exalting  each 
some  one  of  the  four  elements  above  the  others,  and  for 
neglecting  that  superior  control  of  the  world  of  terrestrial 
nature  in  which  both  Christian  and  astrologer  confided.  An- 
other argument  against  pagan  worships  is  that  they  include 


XXIII 


PAGAN  AND  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT 


529 


human  and  immoral  elements  which  cannot  be  explained  as 
based  upon  natural  law  ^  and  the  rule  of  that  supreme  God 
or  "God  the  fabricator,"  "who  composed  all  things  by  the 
orderly  method  of  divine  workmanship," — phrases  which, 
as  Ziegler  has  shown,^  occur  both  in  the  De  errore  and  Ma- 
thesis.  Furthermore,  in  the  De  errore  Firmicus'  allusions 
to  the  planets,  which  include  a  representation  of  the  Sun 
making  a  reproachful  address  to  certain  pagans,^  indicate 
that  he  regarded  the  stars  as  of  immense  importance  in  the 
administration  of  the  universe. 

It  is  also  worth  remarking  that  in  both  works  Firmicus 
sets  the  emperors  above  the  rest  of  mankind  and  closely  as- 
sociates them  with  the  celestial  bodies  and  "the  supreme 
God."  If  in  Mathesis  he  prays  for  the  perpetuation  of  the 
line  of  Constantine  and  forbids  astrologers  to  make  predic- 
tions concerning  the  emperor  on  the  ground  that  his  fate  is 
not  subject  to  the  stars  but  directly  to  the  supreme  God,  "and 
inasmuch  as  the  whole  surface  of  the  earth  is  subject  to 
the  emperor,  he  too  is  reckoned  in  the  number  of  those  gods 
whom  the  principal  divinity  has  established  to  perform  and 
preserve  all  things":'* — if  he  says  this  in  Mathesis,  in  De 
errore  he  repeatedly  addresses  the  emperors  as  "most  holy"  ^ 
and  in  one  passage  says,  "You  now,  O  Constantius  and 
Constans,  most  holy  emperors,  and  the  virtue  of  your  ven- 
erated faith  must  be  implored.  It  is  erected  above  men  and, 
separated  from  earthly  frailty,  joins  in  alliance  with  things 
celestial  and  in  all  its  acts  so  far  as  it  can  follows  the  will 
of  the  supreme  God.  .  .  .  Your  felicity  is  joined  with  God's 
virtue,  with  Christ  fighting  at  your  side  you  have  triumphed 
on  behalf  of  human  safety."  ^ 

If  the  author  of  De  errore  is  not  unfavorable  to  astrology 
the  author  of  the  Mathesis  is  strongly  inclined  towards  mon- 


^  Ziegler,  p.  7,  "Physica  ratio 
quam  dicis,  alio  genere  celetur" ; 
p.  9,  "quod  dicant  physica  ratione 
conpositum." 

'Ziegler,  p.  5. 

"  Ziegler,  p.  23. 

*Kroll  et  Skutsch,  I,  86,   12-21. 


'Ziegler,  pp.  15,. 3.8,  39,  64,  67, 
81,  82,  "sacratissimi  imperatores"; 
pp.  31,  40,  "sacrosancti  principes"; 
p.  65.  "sanctarum  aurium  vestra- 
rum." 

•Ziegler,  pp.  53-4. 


Attitude 
of  both 
works  to 
the  em- 
perors. 


Religious 
attitude 
of  the 
Mathesis. 


530  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

otheism  and  decidedly  religious.  He  indignantly  repels 
the  accusation  that  astrology,  which  teaches  that  "all  our 
acts  are  arranged  by  the  divine  courses  of  the  stars,"  draws 
men  away  "from  the  cult  of  the  gods  and  of  religions." 
"We  cause  the  gods  to  be  feared  and  worshiped,  we  demon- 
strate their  might  and  majesty."  ^  The  passage  just  quoted 
and  some  others  are  suggestive  of  polytheism,  and  Firmicus 
frequently  speaks  of  the  planets  as  "gods."  Probably  in 
this  he  is  reproducing  the  phraseology  and  reflecting  the  at- 
titude of  the  astrological  works  which  he  uses  as  his  au- 
thorities and  which  belong  to  the  period  of  the  pagan  past. 
His  apotelesmata,  too,  or  predictions  of  nativities  for  various 
horoscopes,  give  little  or  no  indication  of  being  especially 
adapted  to  a  Christian  society,  although  in  some  other  re- 
spects they  fit  his  own  age.^  But  while  the  work  contains 
a  considerable  residue  of  paganism,  its  prevailing  conception 
of  deity  is  one  supreme  God,  the  rector  of  the  planets,  "who 
composed  all  things  by  the  arrangement  of  everlasting  law,"  ^ 
and  who  made  man  the  microcosm  from  the  four  elements.* 
He  is  prayed  to  thus  : 

"But  lest  my  words  be  bereft  of  divine  aid  and  the  envy 
of  some  hateful  man  impugn  them  by  hostile  attacks,  who- 
ever thou  art,  God,  who  continuest  day  after  day  the  course 
of  the  heavens  in  rapid  rotation,  who  perpetuatest  the  mobile 
agitation  of  ocean's  tides,  who  strengthenest  earth's  solidity 
in  the  immovable  strength  of  its  foundations,  who  re  freshest 
with  night's  sleep  the  toil  of  our  earthly  bodies,  who  when 
our  strength  is  renewed  returnest  the  grace  of  sweetest  light, 
who  stirrest  all  the  substance  of  thy  work  by  the  salutary 
breath  of  the  winds,  who  pourest  forth  the  waves  of  streams 
and  fountains  in  tireless  force,  who  revolvest  the  varied 
seasons  by  sure  periods  of  days :  sole  Governor  and  Prince 
of  all,  sole  Emperor  and  Lord,  whom  all  the  celestial  forces 

*  Kroll  et  Skutsch,  I,  17-18.  ^  I,   16,  20,  "Summo  illi  ac  rec- 

^  See  my  "A  Roman  Astrologer  tori     dec,     qui     omnia     perpetua 

as  a  Historical  Source,"  Classical  legis  dispositione  composuit.  .  .  ," 

Philology,  VIII,  415-35,  especially  *I,  16,  14;  I,  57,  2;  I,  90,  1 1,  to 

p.  421.  91,    ID. 


XXIII  PAGAN  AND  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT  531 

serve,  whose  will  is  the  substance  of  perfect  work,  by  whose 
faultless  laws  all  nature  is  forever  adorned  and  regulated; 
thou  Father  alike  and  Mother  of  every  thing,  thou  bound 
to  thyself,  Father  and  Son,  by  one  bond  of  relationship;  to 
Thee  we  extend  suppliant  hands,  Thee  with  trembling  sup- 
plication we  venerate ;  grant  us  grace  to  attempt  the  explana- 
tion of  the  courses  of  thy  stars ;  thine  is  the  power  that  some- 
how impels  us  to  that  interpretation.  With  a  mind  pure  and 
separated  from  all  earthly  thoughts  and  purged  from  every 
stain  of  sin  we  have  written  these  books  for  thy  Romans."  ^ 
Doubtless  these  words  might  have  been  written  by  a  Neo- 
Platonist  or  a  pagan,  but  it  also  seems  likely  that  they  were 
penned  by  a  Christian  astrologer. 

Firmicus  provides  not  only  for  divine  government  of  Christian 
the  universe  and  creation  of  the  world  and  man,  but  also  to"'as-'°"^ 
for  prayer  to  God  and  for  human  free  will,^  since  by  the  di-  trology 
vinity  of  the  soul  we  are  able  to  resist  in  some  measure  the 
decrees  of  the  stars.  He  also  holds  that  human  laws  and 
moral  standards  are  not  rendered  of  no  avail  by  the  force 
of  the  stars  but  are  very  useful  to  the  soul  in  its  struggle  by 
the  power  of  the  divine  mind  against  the  vices  of  the  body.^ 
Indeed,  not  only  is  the  astrologer  himself  urged  at  consider- 
able length  to  lead  a  pure,  upright,  and  unselfish  life,  but  "to 
show  the  right  way  of  living  to  sinful  men,  so  that,  reformed 
by  your  teaching,  they  may  be  freed  from  the  errors  of  their 
past  life."  *  The  human  soul  is  also  immortal,  a  spark  of 
that  same  divine  mind  which  through  the  stars  exerts  its 
influence  upon  terrestrial  bodies.^  All  this  may  be  consis- 
tent or  not  both  with  itself  and  with  the  art  of  astrology,  but 
it  meets  the  chief  objections  that  Christians  might  make  and 
had  made  to  the  art. 

These  and  other  objections  to  the  art  of  nativities  are  Astrology 
the  theme  to  which  the  first  of  the  eight  books  of  the  Ma-  P^^o^^^ 

*  expen- 

iT     r.  o  r        .  r  1  ■  r   mentally. 

I,  280,  2-28.  for  the  successful  continuance  of 

*  Besides  the  prayer  just  quoted,  the  dynasty  of  Constantine. 
see  I,  18,  10-13.    See  also  the  long         *  I,  18,  25-9. 
prayer  at  the  end  of  the  first  book         *I,  85-89  (Book  II,  chapter  30). 
to  the  planets  and  supreme  God  *  I,  17,  2-23. 


532 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Informa- 
tion to  be 
gained 
from  the 
third  and 
fourth 
books. 


thesis  is  devoted.  Firmicus  points  out  that  some  of  the  other 
objections  to  astrology  do  not  correctly  state  the  doctrines 
of  that  art;  others  he  admits  are  ingenious  arguments  which 
sound  well  on  paper  but  he  insists  that  if  the  opponents  of 
astrology,  instead  of  protesting  that  the  influence  of  the 
stars  at  a  given  instant  is  incalculable,  would  put  the  matter 
to  the  test  experimentally,^  they  would  soon  be  convinced  of 
the  truth  of  astrologers'  predictions,  although  he  grants  that 
unskilful  astrologers  sometimes  give  wrong  responses.  But 
he  insists  that  persons  who  have  not  tested  astrology  experi- 
mentally are  unfit  to  pass  upon  its  merits.^  He  affirms  that 
the  human  spirit  which  has  discovered  so  many  other  sci- 
ences and  to  which  so  much  of  divinity  and  religion  has  been 
revealed  is  capable  also  of  casting  horoscopes,  and  that  as- 
trological prediction  is  a  relatively  easy  task  compared  to 
the  mapping  out  of  the  whole  heavens  and  courses  of  the 
stars  which  the  mathematici  have  already  performed  so  suc- 
cessfully.^ And  he  does  not  see  why  anyone  persists  in 
denying  the  power  of  fate  in  human  affairs  when  all  about 
him  he  can  see  the  innocent  suffering  and  the  guilty  escap- 
ing; the  best  men  such  as  Socrates,  Plato,  and  Pythagoras 
meeting  an  ill  fate ;  and  unprincipled  persons  like  Alcibiades 
and  Sulla  prospering.* 

The  remaining  seven  books  of  the  Mathesis  are  given 
over  to  the  art  of  horoscope  casting.  The  second  book  con- 
sists chiefly  of  preliminary  directions,  but  the  others  state 
what  men  will  be  bom  under  various  constellations.  Of 
these  the  last  four  books  are  extant  only  in  manuscripts  of 
the  fifteenth  and  sixteenth  centuries,  while  the  first  four  are 
found  in  manuscripts  going  back  to  the  eleventh  century. 
Moreover,  although  books  five  to  eight  cover  more  pages 
than  books  three  and  four,  they  do  not  supply  so  many  de- 
tails or  so  satisfactory  a  picture  of  human  society  in  their 
predictions.  These  divergences,  which  are  mainly  ones  of 
omission,  do  not  invalidate  the  results  which  we  gain  from 


*  I,  10,  3-. 
•I,  11,7". 


'Book  I,  Chapter  4   (I,  ii-iS). 
*Book  I,  Chapter  7   (I,  19-30). 


xxiii  PAGAN  AND  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT  533 

an  analysis  of  the  third  and  fourth  books,  but  do  raise  the 
question  whether  the  later  books,  especially  the  fifth  and 
sixth,  are  genuine.  In  them  the  wording  becomes  vaguer, 
little  knowledge  is  shown  of  conditions  at  the  time  that  Fir- 
micus  wrote,  the  predictions  are  more  sensational  and  rhetori- 
cal. Only  the  latter  part  of  the  eighth  book  carries  the  con- 
viction of  reality  that  books  three  and  four  do.  These  two 
books  are  both  independent  units  and  through  their  predic- 
tions of  the  future  supply  a  general  picture  of  human  so- 
ciety, presumably  that  of  Firmicus'  own  time  or  not  long 
before.  One  naturally  assumes  that  those  matters  to  which 
Firmicus  devotes  most  space  and  emphasis  are  the  promi- 
nent features  of  his  age.  Let  us  see  what  his  picture  is  of 
religion,  divination,  the  occult  science  and  magic,  natural 
science  and  medicine.^ 

To  religion  Firmicus  gives  less  space  than  to  politics.   Religion 
There  are  no  clear  references  to  Christianity,  but  there  are  i^^gic; 
few  allusions  to  any  particular  cults.     Firmicus,  however,    exorcists 
indicates  the  existence  of  many  cults,  speaking  five  times  of 
the  heads  of  religions,  and  characterizing  men  as  "those  who 
regard  all  religions  and  gods  with  a  certain  trepidation," 
"those  devoted  to  certain  religions,"  "those  who  cherish  the 
greatest  religions,"  and  so  on.     Temples,^  priests,  and  div- 
ination ^  are  the  three  features  of  religion  that  he  mentions 
most.     Magic  and  religion  are  closely  associated  in  his  pre- 
dictions, for  instance,  "temple  priests  ever  famed  in  magic 
lore."     Sacred  or  religious  literatures  and  persons  devoted 
to  them  are  mentioned  thrice,  while  in  a  fourth  passage  we 

**  For  a  fuller  exposition  of  this  marking  that  H.  O.  Taylor,   The 

quantitative     method     of     source-  Classical    Heritage,    1901,    p.    80, 

analysis   and   the  results   obtained  notes    that     Synesius     about    400 

thereby  see  Thorndike  (1913),  pp.  A.  D.     speaks     of     the     Christian 

415-35.  churches     at     Constantinople     as 

'  Temple-robbers,   5  ;    servile   or  "temples." 
ignoble     employ     in     temples,     5;  ^  Chief  priests,  5;  priests,  9;  of 

spending    one's    time    in    temples,  provinces,    i ;   priestess,    i ;  priests 

4 ;_  builders   of   temples,   3;    bene-  of    Cybele     (archigalli),    3;    Asi- 

ficiaries    of    temples,     3 ;     temple  archae,    1 ;    priest   of    some   great 

guards,  2;  neocori,  3;  and  so  on,  goddess,   i;  illicit  rites,  i.     There 

making  35   references   to  temples  are  27  passages  concerning  divina- 

in  all.     It   is   perhaps   worth   re-  tion. 


534 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Divina- 
tion. 


Magic  as  a 
branch  of 
learning. 


hear  of  men  "investigating  the  secrets  of  all  religions  and 
of  heaven  itself."  Other  interesting  descriptions  ^  are  of 
those  who  "stay  in  temples  in  an  unkempt  state  and  always 
walk  abroad  thus,  and  never  cut  their  hair,  and  who  would 
announce  something  to  men  as  if  said  by  the  gods,  such  as 
are  wont  to  be  in  temples,  who  are  accustomed  to  predjct 
the  future";  and  of  "men  terrible  to  the  gods  and  who  de- 
spise all  kinds  of  perjuries.  Moreover,  they  will  be  terrible 
to  all  demons,  and  at  their  approach  the  wicked  spirits  of 
demons  flee;  and  they  free  men  who  are  thus  troubled,  not 
by  force  of  words  but  by  their  mere  appearing;  and  how- 
ever violent  the  demon  may  be  who  shakes  the  body  and 
spirit  of  man,  whether  he  be  aerial  or  terrestrial  or  infernal, 
he  flees  at  the  bidding  of  this  sort  of  man  and  fears  his  pre- 
cepts with  a  certain  veneration.  These  are  they  who  are 
called  exorcists  by  the  people."  Religious  games  and  con- 
tests are  mentioned  four  times :  the  carving,  consecrating, 
adoring,  and  clothing  of  images  of  the  gods,  twice  each; 
porters  at  religious  ceremonies,  thrice;  hymn  singers,  twice; 
pipe-players  once.  Five  passages  represent  persons  profes- 
sionally engaged  in  religion  as  growing  rich  thereby. 

We  are  told  that  men  "predict  the  future  either  by  the 
divinity  of  their  own  minds  or  by  the  admonition  of  the 
gods  or  from  oracles  or  by  the  venerable  discipline  of  some 
art."  ^  Augurs,  aruspices,  interpreters  of  dreams,  mathema- 
tici  (astrologers),  diviners,  and  prophets  are  mentioned. 
Once  Firmicus  alludes  to  false  divination  but  he  usually  im- 
plies that  it  is  a  valid  art. 

From  religion  and  divination  we  easily  pass  to  the  occult 
arts  and  sciences,  and  thence  to  learning  and  literature  in 
general,  from  which  occult  learning  is  scarcely  distinguished 
in  the  Mathesis.  Magicians  or  magic  arts  are  mentioned  no 
less  than  seven  times  in  varied  relations  with  religion,  phi' 
losophy,  medicine,  and  astronomy  or  astrology,  showing  that 
magic  was  not  invariably  regarded  as  evil  in  that  age,  and 


*  Kroll  et  Skutsch,  I,  148,  8  and 
123,  4- 


Kroll  et  Skutsch,  I,  201,  6. 


science. 


XXIII  PAGAN  AND  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT  535 

that  it  was  confused  and  intermingled  with  the  arts  and  phi- 
losophy as  well  as  with  the  religion  of  the  times, ^  There  are 
a  number  of  other  allusions  to  secret  and  illicit  arts  or  writ- 
ings; these,  however,  appear  to  be  more  unfavorably  re- 
garded and  probably  largely  consist  of  witchcraft  and  poi- 
soning. 

The  evidence  of  the  Mathesis  suggests  that  the  civiliza-  Interest  in 
tion  of  declining  Rome  was  at  least  not  conscious  of  the  in- 
tellectual decadence  and  lack  of  scientific  interest  so  gener- 
ally imputed  to  it.  We  find  three  descriptions  of  intellectual 
pioneers  who  learn  what  no  master  has  ever  taught  them, 
and  one  other  instance  of  men  who  pretend  to  do  so.  We 
also  hear  of  "those  learning  much  and  knowing  all,  also  in- 
ventors," and  of  those  "learning  everything,"  and  "desiring 
to  learn  the  secrets  of  all  arts."  This  curiosity,  it  is  true, 
seems  to  be  largely  devoted  to  occult  science,  but  it  also  seems 
plain  that  mathematics  and  medicine  were  important  fac- 
tors in  fourth-century  culture  as  well  as  the  rhetorical 
studies  whose  role  has  perhaps  been  overestimated.  Let  us 
compare  the  statistics.  Oratory  is  mentioned  eighteen  times, 
and  it  is  to  be  noted  that  literary  attainments  and  learning 
as  well  as  mere  eloquence  are  regarded  as  essential  in  an 
orator.  Men  of  letters  other  than  orators  are  found  in  six 
passages,  and  poets  in  only  three.  A  passage  reading  "philol- 
ogists or  those  skilled  in  laborious  letters"  suggests  that 
four  instances  of  the  phrase  difficiles  litter ae  should  perhaps 
be  classed  under  linguistic  rather  than  occult  studies.  There 
are  four  allusions  to  grammarians  and  two  to  masters  of 
grammar,  as  against  one  description  of  "contentious,  con- 

*  Cumont    says     {Oriental    Re-  that    Firmicus   does    not   use   the 

ligions    in    Roman    Paganism,    p.  word     "theurgy."     Cumont     also 

188)  :  "But  the  ancients  expressly  states    (p.    179)    that   in   the   last 

distinguished    'magic,'    which    was  period  of  paganism  the  name  phi- 

always    under   suspicion   and    dis-  losopher  was  finally  applied  to  all 

approved  of,   from  the  legitimate  adepts  in  occult  science.     But  in 

and  honorable  art   for  which  the  Firmicus,    while    magic    and    phi- 

narne     'theurgy'     was     invented."  losophy    are     associated     in     two 

This    distinction     was     made    by  passages,  there  are  five  other  allu- 

Porphyry     and     others,     and     is  sions  to  magic  and  three  separate 

alluded    to    by    Augustine    in    the  mentions  of  philosophers. 
City  of  God,  but  it  is  to  be  noted 


536  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

tradictory  dialecticians,  professing  that  they  know  what  no 
teaching  has  acquainted  them  with,  mischievous  fellows,  but 
unable  to  do  any  effective  thinking."'^  On  the  other  hand, 
there  are  fourteen  allusions  to  astronomy  and  astrology 
(not  including  the  mathematici  already  listed  under  divina- 
tion), three  to  geometry,  and  six  to  other  varieties  of  mathe- 
matics.^ Philosophers  are  mentioned  five  times;  practition- 
ers of  medicine,  eleven  times ;  ^  surgeons,  once ;  and  botan- 
ists, twice.  These  professions  seem  to  be  well  paid  and  are 
spoken  of  in  complimentary  terms. 
Diseases  Death,  injury,  and  disease  loom  up  large  in  Firmicus' 

tiquity.  prospectus  for  the  human  race,  making  us  realize  the  bene- 
fits of  nineteenth-century  medicine  as  well  as  of  modern 
peace.*  No  less  than  174  passages  deal  with  disease  and 
many  of  them  list  two  or  more  ills.  Mental  disorders  are 
mentioned  in  37  places ;  ^  physical  deformities  in  six.  Other 
specific  ailments  mentioned  are  as  follows :  blindness  and 
eye  troubles,  10;  deafness  and  ear  troubles,  5;  impediments 
of  speech,  4 ;  baldness,  i ;  foul  odors,  i ;  dyspeptics,  4 ;  other 
stomach  complaints,  7 ;  dysentery,  2 ;  liver  trouble,  i ;  jaun- 
dice, I ;  dropsy,  5 ;  spleen  disorders,  i ;  gonorrhoea,  2 ;  other 
diseases  of  the  urinary  bladder  and  private  parts,  6;  con- 
sumption and  lung  troubles,  6;  hemorrhages,  6;  apoplexy, 
3 ;  spasms,  5 ;  ills  attributed  to  bad  or  excessive  humors,  12; 
leprosy  and  other  skin  diseases,  6 ;  ague,  i ;  fever,  i ;  pains 
in  various  parts  of  the  body,  6;  internal  pains  and  hidden 
diseases,  9;  diseases  of  women,  5.  There  remain  a  large 
number  of  vague  allusions  to  ill-health:  21  to  debility,  12 
to  languor,  3  to  invalids,  and  49  other  passages.  Only  eight 
passages  allude  to  the  cure  of  disease.  Among  the  methods 
suggested  are  cauterizing,  incantations,  ordinary  remedies, 

*  Kroll  et  Skutsch,  I,  161,  26.  ^  Acstus  animi,  5;   insanity,   13; 

'Computus,  3;   calculus,  2;  and  lunatics,   10;   epileptics,  8;  melan- 

"those  who  excel  at  numbers,"  i.  cholia,    3 ;     inflammation    of    the 

"Including  two  mentions  of  brain  (frenetici),  4;  delirium,  de- 
court  physicians  (archiatri).  See  mentia,  demoniacs,  alienation,  and 
Codex  Thcod.,  Lib.  XIII,  Tit.  3,  madness,  one  or  two  each;  vague 
passim,  for  their  position.  allusions    to    mental    ills    and    in- 

*I  leave  this  sentence  as  I  wrote  juries,  5. 
it  in  1913. 


XXIII 


PAGAN  AND  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT 


537 


and  seeking  divine  aid,  which  last  is  mentioned  most  often. 
The  eleven  references  to  medical  practitioners  should,  how- 
ever, be  recalled  here.  The  predictions  as  to  length  of  life 
are  inadequate  to  the  drawing  of  conclusions  on  that  point. 

Firmicus  regards  his  work  as  a  new  contribution  so  far   Place  of 
as  the  Latin-speaking  world  is  concerned.^     Not  that  there   j^  ^he  his- 

had  not  been  previous   writing-  in   Latin  on  the   subject.    ^°[y  9^ 

•^,  _     ,     °  •'  astrology. 

Fronto  "had  written  predictions  very  accurately,"  but  "as 
if  he  were  addressing  persons  already  perfect  and  skilled  in 
the  art,  and  without  first  instructing  in  the  elements  and 
practice  of  the  art."  ^  Firmicus  supplies  this  essential  pre- 
liminary instruction,  which  hardly  anyone  of  the  Latins  had 
given,  and  corrects  Fronto's  faulty  presentation  of  antiscia, 
in  which  he  followed  Hipparchus,  by  the  correcter  method 
of  Navigius  (Nigidius?)  and  Ptolemy.^  Firmicus  gives  no 
systematic  account  of  his  authorities  "*  but  occasionally  cites 
them  for  some  particular  point  and  in  general  professes  to 
follow  not  only  the  Greeks  but  the  divine  men  of  Egypt  and 
Babylon,  chief  among  whom  seem  to  be  Nechepso  and  Peto- 
siris  and  the  Hermetic  works  to  or  by  Aesculapius  and  Ha- 
nubius.  An  Abram  or  Abraham  is  also  cited  several  times. 
But  Firmicus  also  gives  the  Sphaera  Barharica,  "unknown 
to  all  the  Romans  and  to  many  Greeks,"  and  which  escaped 
the  notice  even  of  Petosiris  and  Nechepso.^  Firmicus  him- 
self is  named  by  no  ancient  author  ^  but  was  well  known  in 
the  eleventh  and  twelfth  centuries,  as  we  shall  see.  In  the 
Mathesis  he  cites  two  previous  astrological  treatises  of  his 


*  In  his  last  chapter  he  says, 
"Take  then,  my  dear  Mavortius, 
what  I  promised  you  with  extreme 
trepidation  of  spirit,  these  seven 
books  composed  conformably  to 
the  order  and  number  of  the 
seven  planets.  For  the  first  book 
deals  only  with  the  defense  of 
the  art ;  but  in  tlie  other  books 
we  have  transmitted  to  the  Ro- 
mans the  discipline  of  a  new 
work,"  (II,  360,  10-15).  And  in 
<he  introduction  to  the  fifth  book 


he  writes,  "We  have  written  these 
books  for  your  Romans  lest,  when 
every  other  art  and  science  had 
been  translated,  this  task  should 
seem  to  remain  unattempted  by 
Roman  genius,"  (I,  280,  28-30). 

'I,  41,  7  and  15;  I,  40,  9-11, 

^I,  41,  5  and  II ;  I,  40,  8. 

*  They  are  listed  by  Kroll  et 
Skutsch,  II,  362,  Index  auctorum. 

"*  II,  294,  12-21. 

'  Kroll  et  Skutsch,  II,  p.  iii. 


538 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Libanius 
accused 
of  magic. 


Declama- 
tion 

against  a 
magician. 


own  ^  and  expresses  his  intention  of  composing  another 
work  in  twelve  books  on  the  subject  of  Myrio genesis.^  The 
astrologer  Hephaestion  of  Thebes,  who  wrote  later  in  the 
fourth  century,  seems  also  to  have  been  a  Christian,  so  that 
Firmicus  was  not  a  solitary  case  or  an  anomaly.^ 

The  writings  of  Libanius,  314-391  A.  D.,  the  sophist  and 
rhetorician,  throw  some  light  on  the  relations  between  magic 
and  learning  in  the  fourth  century,  show  that  sorcery  and 
divination  were  actually  practiced,  and  largely  duplicate  im- 
pressions already  received  from  Apuleius,  Apollonius,  and 
Galen,  and  a  Christian  like  John  Chrysostom  as  well  as  just 
now  from  Firmicus.  Libanius  tells  us  how  Bemarchius,  a 
rival  of  his  at  Athens,  who  would  have  poisoned  him  if  he 
could,  instead  circulated  reports  that  he  (Bemarchius)  was 
the  victim  of  enchantments,  and  that  Libanius  had  consulted 
against  him  an  astrologer  who  was  able  to  control  the  stars, 
so  that  he  could  confer  benefits  upon  one  man  and  work  sor- 
cery against  another.  This  incidentally  is  another  good  il- 
lustration of  how  easily  astrology  passed  from  mere  pre- 
diction of  the  future  to  operative  magic,  and  of  the  essential 
unity  of  all  magic  arts.  The  mob  was  aroused  against  Li- 
banius and  a  praetor  who  tried  to  protect  him  was  ousted 
and  another  installed  at  daybreak  who  was  ready  to  put  Li- 
banius to  death.  Torture  was  prepared  and  Libanius  was 
advised  to  leave  Athens,  if  he  did  not  wish  to  die  there,  and 
took  the  advice  and  left.* 

Among  the  declamations  of  Libanius  is  one  against  a 
magician,^  supposed  to  have  been  delivered  under  the  fol- 
lowing circumstances.     The  city  was  afflicted  with  a  pesti- 


*  I,  258,  10,  "in  singulari  libro, 
quern  de  domino  geniturae  et 
chronocratore  ad  Murinum  nos- 
trum scripsimus" ;  II,  229,  23,  "ex- 
eo  libro  qui  de  fine  vitae  a  nobis 
scriptus  est." 

MI,  18,  24;  II,  283,  19. 

*  Engelbrecht,  Hcphdstion  von 
Theben  und  sein  astrologischcs 
Comp-endium,  Vienna,  1887. 


*  De  vita  sua,  in  Libanii  sophis- 
tae  praeliidia  oratoria  LXXII 
declamationcs  XLV  et  disserta- 
tioncs  morales,  Fedcricus  Morellus 
regius  inter pres  e  MSS  maxime 
reg.  biblioihecae  nunc  primum 
edidit  idemque  Latine  vertit  .  .  . 
ad  Hcnricuni  IV  regent  Christian- 
issimuni,  Paris,  1606,  II,  15-18. 

^  Magi  accusatio.  Ibid.,  I,  898- 
911. 


xxiii  PAGAN  AND  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT  539 

lence  and  finally  sent  an  embassy  to  the  Delphic  oracle  to 
learn  how  to  escape  the  scourge.  Apollo  replied  that  they 
must  sacrifice  the  son  of  one  of  the  inhabitants  who  should 
be  determined  by  lot,  and  the  lot  fell  to  the  son  of  a  magician. 
The  father  then  offered  to  stay  the  plague  by  means  of  his 
magic  art,  if  they  would  agree  to  spare  his  son.  Against 
this  proposal  Libanius  argues,  urging  the  people  to  carry  out 
their  original  decision  and  not  to  anger  the  Delphic  god  by 
violating  his  oracle,  whose  reliability  is  attested  by  "long 
time  and  much  experience  and  common  testimony."  He 
declares  that  magic  is  an  evil  art,  and  that  magicians  make 
no  one  happy  but  many  wretched,  ruining  homes,  bringing 
disaster  to  persons  who  have  never  harmed  them,  and  dis- 
turbing even  the  spirits  of  the  dead.  He  also  censures  the 
magician  for  not  having  offered  to  save  the  city  from  the 
plague  before,  and  expresses  some  scepticism  as  to  his  magic 
power,  asking  why  he  did  not  prevent  the  fatal  lot  from 
falling  to  his  son,  or  why  he  does  not  save  him  now  by 
causing  him  to  vanish  from  sight,  or  vouchsafe  some  other 
unmistakable  sign  of  his  magic  power.  It  appears  that  the 
magician  had  asked  a  delay,  saying  that  he  must  wait  for 
the  moon  before  he  could  operate  against  the  plague.  Li- 
banius points  out  that  meanwhile  the  citizens  are  perishing 
and  that  fulfillment  of  Apollo's  oracle  will  bring  instant 
relief.  It  would  seem,  however,  that  some  of  the  citizens 
had  more  faith  in  the  magician  than  in  the  god,  which  sup- 
ports the  oft-made  general  assertion  that  the  magic  arts 
waxed  as  pagan  religion  and  its  superstitious  observances 
waned.  Libanius  concludes  his  oration  or  imaginary  ora- 
tion with  the  cutting  and  heartless  witticism  that  the  ma- 
gician can  lose  his  son  more  easily  than  can  anyone  else, 
since  he  will  of  course  still  be  able  to  invoke  his  spirit  from 
the  dead. 

Libanius'  own  faith  in  divination  is  not  only  suggested   Faith  of 
by  the  attitude  toward  the  Delphic  oracle  in  the  foregoing  {„  dlvina- 
declamation  but  is  attested  by  two  passages  in  his  autobiog-   tion. 
raphy.    His    great-great-grandfather    had    so    excelled    in 


540 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Magic  and 
astrology 
in  the 
pseudo- 
Quintilian 
declama- 
tions. 


Fusion  of 
Christian- 
ity and 
paganism 
in  Syne- 
sius  of 
Cyrene. 


mantike  that  he  foresaw  that  his  children  would  die  by  steel, 
although  they  would  be  handsome  and  great  and  good  speak- 
ers. It  also  was  rumored  that  a  celebrated  sophist  had  pre- 
dicted many  things  concerning  Libanius  himself,  which  Li- 
banius  assures  us  had  since  come  to  pass.^ 

Of  the  same  type  as  Libanius'  declamation  against  the 
magician  is  the  fourth  pseudo-Quintilian  declamation  in 
Latin  concerning  an  astrologer's  prediction,  which  we  shall 
later  in  the  twelfth -century  find  Bernard  Silvester  enlarging 
upon  in  his  poem  entitled  Mathematicus.  In  another  of  the 
pseudo-Quintilian  declamations  the  word  experimentum  is 
used  of  a  magician's  feat.  "O  harsh  and  cruel  magician,  O 
manufacturer  of  our  tears,  I  would  that  you  had  not  given 
so  great  an  experiment !  We  are  angry  at  you,  yet  we  must 
cajole  you.  While  you  imprison  the  ghost,  we  know  that 
you  alone  can  evoke  it."  ^ 

That  more  than  fifty  years  after  Firmicus  adherence  to 
Christianity  might  be  combined  with  trust  in  divination  of 
the  future,  occult  science,  and  magical  invocation  of  spirits, 
and  with  various  other  pagan  and  Neo-Platonic  beliefs,  is 
well  illustrated  by  the  case  of  Synesius  of  Cyrene,^  a  fel- 
low-African and  contemporary  of  Augustine.  Synesius, 
however,  traced  his  descent  from  the  Heracleidae,  wrote  in 
Greek,  and  displayed  a  Hellenism  unusual  for  his  time,*  and, 


^  De  vita  sua,  Opera,  II,  2-3. 

"X,  ig6,  II,  De  sepulcro  incan- 
tato. 

^  My  citations  of  Synesius' 
works,  unless  otherwise  noted,  are 
from  the  edition :  Syncsii  Cyrenaei 
Quae  Extant  Opera  Omnia,  ed.  J. 
G.  Krabinger,  Landshut,  1850,  vol. 
I,  which  has  alone  appeared.  The 
older  edition  of  Petavius  with 
Latin  translation  is  reprinted  in 
Migne  PG,  vol.  66,  1021-1756.  For 
a  French  translation,  with  several 
introductory  essays,  see  H.  Druon, 
Gluvrcs  de  Synesius,  Paris,  1878. 
The  Letters  and  Hymns  have 
often  been  published  separately. 
For  this  and  other  further  bibli- 
ography see  Christ,  Gesch.  d. 
griech.  Litt.,  1913,  II,  ii,   1 167-71, 


where,  however,  no  note  is  taken 
of  Berthelot's  discussion  of  Syne- 
sius as  a  reputed  author  of  al- 
chemistic  treatises. 

Some  works  on  Synesius  are : 
H.  Druon,  Etudes  sur  la  zne  et  les 
auvres  de  Synesius,  Paris,  1859; 
R.  Volkmann,  Synesius  von 
Cyrene,  Berlin,  1869;  W.  S.  Craw- 
ford, Synesius  the  Hellene,  Lon- 
don, X901 ;  G.  Griitzmacher,  Syne- 
sios  von  Kyrcne,  Leipzig,  1913. 
In  periodicals :  F.  X.  Kraus  in 
Theol.  Quartalschrift,  1865  and 
1866;  O.  Seeck,  in  Philologus, 
1893. 

*  See  Crawford,  op.  ctt.,  and 
monographs  listed  in  Christ,  op. 
cit.,  p.  1168,  notes  4  and  8. 


XXIII  PAGAN  AND  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT  541 

while  he  did  not  find  the  Athens  of  his  day  entirely  to  his 
taste,  continued  the  philosophical  and  rhetorical  traditions 
of  the  sophists  of  the  Roman  Empire,  like  Libanius  of  whom 
we  have  just  spoken.  His  extant  letters  show  that  Hypatia 
was  numbered  among  his  friends  and  had  been  his  teacher 
at  the  Neo-Platonic  and  mathematical  school  of  Alexandria. 
Hypatia  was  murdered  by  the  fanatical  Christian  mob  of 
that  city  in  415.  But  very  different  was  the  attitude  of  the 
people  of  Ptolemais  to  the  like-minded  Synesius.  A  few 
years  before  they  had  elected  him  bishop !  ^  Moreover,  he 
distinctly  stipulated  ^  that  he  should  not  renounce  his  wife 
and  family  nor  his  philosophical  opinions,  which  seem  to 
have  involved  a  sceptical  attitude  towards  miracles  and  the 
resurrection,  and  a  belief  in  the  eternity  of  the  world  and 
pre-existence  of  the  soul  rather  than  in  creation,^  in  addi- 
tion to  the  views  which  we  are  about  to  set  forth.  It  has 
been  observed  also  that  his  doctrine  of  the  Trinity  is  more 
Neo-Platonic  than  Christian.* 

The  dates  of  Synesius'  birth  and  death  are  uncertain.  Career  of 
He  seems  to  have  been  born  about  370.  His  last  dateable  y"^"*^^- 
letter  appears  to  be  written  in  412,  but  some  give  the  date 
of  his  death  as  late  as  430.  Others  contend  that  he  did  not 
live  to  hear  of  Hypatia's  murder.  Before  he  was  made 
bishop  he  had  been  to  Constantinople  on  a  mission  to  the 
emperor  to  secure  alleviation  of  the  oppressive  taxation  in 
Cyrene.  He  had  lived  in  Athens  and  Alexandria  as  a 
student,  and  in  Cyrene  on  his  country  estate.  Here,  if  in 
his  fondness  for  books  and  philosophy  he  constituted  a  sur- 
vival of  the  past,  in  his  fondness  for  the  chase  and  dogs 
and  horses  and  his  repulsion  of  an  invasion  of  Libyan  ma- 
rauders he  was  the  forerunner  of  many  a  medieval  feudal 

^  The  date  is  variously  stated  as  IVahl  und  Weihe  sum  Bischof,  in 

411,  406,  or  410.  Hist.   Jahrb.,   XXIII    (1902),   pp. 

'A.    J.    Kleflfner,    Synesius   von  751-74. 

Cyrene  .  .  .  und   sein   angeblicher  *  Christ,  op.  cit.,  p.  1168,  note  i. 

Vorbehalt    bet    seiner    IVahl    und  *  Ibid.,  p.  1170,  citing  K.  Prach- 

Weihe    sum    Bischof    von  J'tole-  ter,      in      Genethliakon      fiir      C. 

mats,  Paderborn,  1901.     H.  Koch,  Robert,  1910,  p.  244,  ct  scq. 
Synesius   von    Cyrene    bei   seiner 


542 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


His  inter- 
est in 
science. 


Belief  in 
occult 
sympa- 
thies 
between 
natural 
obj  ects. 


bishop.  And  after  he  became  bishop,  he  launched  an  excom- 
munication against  the  tyrannical  prefect  Andronicus. 

But  our  particular  interest  is  less  in  his  political  and 
more  purely  literary  activities  than  in  his  taste  for  mathema- 
tics and  science.  He  knew  some  medicine  and  was  well  ac- 
quainted with  geometry  and  astronomy.  He  believed  him- 
self to  be  the  inventor  of  an  astrolabe  and  of  a  hydroscope. 

With  this  interest  in  natural  and  mathematical  science 
went  an  interest  in  occult  science  and  divination.  His  belief 
that  the  universe  was  a  unit  and  all  its  parts  closely  corre- 
lated not  only  led  him  to  maintain,  like  Seneca,  that  what- 
ever had  a  cause  was  a  sign  of  some  future  event,  or  to  hold 
with  Plotinus  that  in  any  and  every  object  the  sage  might 
discern  the  future  of  every  other,  and  that  the  birds  them- 
selves, if  endowed  with  sufficient  intelligence,  would  be  able 
to  predict  the  future  by  observing  the  movements  of  human 
bipeds.^  It  led  him  also  to  the  conclusion  that  the  various 
parts  of  the  universe  were  more  than  passive  mirrors  in 
which  one  might  see  the  future  of  the  other  parts ;  that  they 
further  exerted,  by  virtue  of  the  magic  sympathy  which 
united  all  parts  of  the  universe,  a  potent  active  influence  over 
other  objects  and  occurrences.  The  wise  man  might  not  only 
predict  the  future;  he  might,  to  a  great  extent,  control  it. 
"For  it  must  be,  I  think,  that  of  this  whole,  so  joined  in 
sympathy  and  in  agreement,  the  parts  are  closely  connected 
as  if  members  of  a  single  body.  And  does  not  this  explain 
the  spells  of  the  magi?  For  things,  besides  being  signs  of 
each  other,  have  magic  power  over  each  other.  The  wise 
man,  then,  is  he  who  knows  the  relationships  of  the  parts  of 
the  universe.  For  he  draws  one  object  under  his  control  by 
means  of  another  object,  holding  what  is  at  hand  as  a  pledge 
for  what  is  far  away,  and  working  through  sounds  and  mate- 
rial substances  and  forms."  ^   Synesius  explained  that  plants 

^Ilepl  kvvirvlcov  (On  dreams),  ch.  2.       fi&yccv   Ivyyes  avrai',     Kai  yap  deXyt- 
'llcpi  ivviruiuv  {On  Dreams),  ch. 


3.  "E6ft  yap,  olixai,  tov  iravros  tovtov 
cvpLiradovi  Tt  ovros  Kal  avinrvov  to,  (JLtprf 
irpoarfKnv  dXXijXois,  are  cvos  oKov  tA 
/utXij   Tvyx^fovTa.      Koi  m^?    Trore    ai 


rat  Trap'  dXXjjXcoi',  axnrep  crrnxaiveTai' 
Kal  <ro06s  0  eidtos  Trjv  tC>v  tiepwv  tov 
K6ap.ov  crvyyeveiav.  "EX/cei  yap  fiXXo 
8V  aWov,  ix'^"  tfkxvpa  irapovra  tChv 
ifKelaTov  airovruv,  Kai  <j>uvas,  Kal  ii\as 


XXIII  PAGAN  AND  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT  543 

and  stones  are  related  by  bonds  of  occult  sympathy  to  the 
gods  who  are  within  the  universe  and  who  form  a  part  of 
it,  that  plants  and  stones  have  magic  power  over  these  gods, 
and  that  one  may  by  means  of  such  material  substances 
attract  those  deities.^  He  evidently  believed  that  it  was 
quite  legitimate  to  control  the  processes  of  nature  by  invok- 
ing demons. 

The  devotion  of  Synesius  to  divination  has  been  already  Synesius 
implied.  He  regarded  it  as  among  the  noblest  of  human  tion  and 
pursuits.^  Dreams,  on  which  he  wrote  a  treatise,  he  viewed  astrology, 
as  significant  and  very  useful  events.  They  aided  him,  he 
wrote,  in  his  every-day  life,  and  had  upon  one  occasion 
saved  him  from  magic  devices  against  his  life.^  Warned 
by  a  dream  that  he  would  have  a  son,  he  wrote  a  treatise  for 
the  child  before  it  was  born.^  Of  course,  he  had  faith  in 
astrology.  The  stars  were  well-nigh  ever  present  in  his 
thought.  In  his  Praise  of  Baldness  he  characterized  comets 
as  fatal  omens,  as  harbingers  of  the  worst  public  disasters.^ 
In  On  Providence  he  explained  the  supposed  fact  that  his- 
tory repeats  itself  by  the  periodical  return  to  their  former 
positions  of  the  stars  which  govern  our  life.^  In  On  the 
Gift  of  an  Astrolabe  he  declared  that  "astronomy"  besides 
being  itself  a  noble  science,  prepared  men  for  the  diviner 
mysteries  of  theology.'^ 

Finally,  he  held  the  view  common  among  students  of    Synesius 
magic  that  knowledge  should  be  esoteric ;  that  its  mysteries   alchemist. 
and  marvels  should  be  confined  to  the  few  fitted  to  receive 
them  and  that  they  should  be  expressed  in  language  incom- 
prehensible to  the  vulgar  crowd.^     It  is  perhaps  on  this 

Kal   ffx^M^Ta Evidently  4iroSe£|6is  iardiv  tov  fiapreiav   kv   rols 

Synesius  did  not  regard  the  magi  &pI<ttols  elvai.  twv  eTnTrjSevo/ievwy  dr- 

as  mere  imposters.  Bpicirois. 

*nepi  kvvirvluv,  ch.    3.    Kai  5i)  Kal  '  Ibid.,  ch.  18. 

Bec^  Tivl  Tcov  tiaco  tov  Koafiov'Kidos  kvQkv-  *  Alwv  rj  irepl  Trjs  /car'   avrov  Siayu- 

Se  Kal  fioT&VT}  irpocrriKei,  ols  bixoioiraOoiv  f^S. 

elKti  rfi  (pixrei.  Kal  yoriTeverai.      In  his  °<i>aXd/cpos  kyK(l}fJii.op,  ch.  10. 

Praise  of  Baldness  (€>aXdKpas  kyKu-  ' Alyvimoi  fj  wepl  vpovolas,  bk.  ii, 

fiiov),     ch.   10,   Synesius  tells  how  ch.  7. 

the  Egyptians  attract  demons  by  ''UposHaiovLovwepiTov  So:pov,  ch.  S' 

magic  influences.  'A/wv,  ch.  7.     Ilepi  ivuiri'iwj'.ch.  4. 

*Jl€pl  b>viri>luv,  ch.  I.     AuTtti  fib'  'EiriffToXal,  4,  49,  and  142. 


544  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

account  that  one  of  the  oldest  extant  treatises  of  Greek 
alchemy  is  ascribed  to  him.    Berthelot,  however,  accepted  it 
as  his,  stating  that  "there  is  nothing  surprising  in  Synesius' 
having  really  written  on  alchemy."  ^ 
Macrobius  Synesius  influenced  the  Byzantine  period  but  probably 

dreams^^'^'  "°^  *^^  western  medieval  world.  But  the  Commentary  of 
and  stars.  Macrobius  on  The  Dream  of  Scipio  by  Cicero  is  one  of  the 
treatises  most  frequently  encountered  in  early  medieval  Latin 
manuscripts.  In  the  twelfth  century  Abelard  made  frequent 
reference  to  Macrobius  and  called  him  "no  mean  philoso- 
pher"; in  the  thirteenth  Aquinas  cited  him  as  an  authority 
for  the  doctrines  of  Neo-Platonism.^  Macrobius  himself 
affirmed  that  Vergil  contained  practically  all  necessary 
knowledge  ^  and  that  Cicero's  Dream  of  Scipio  was  a  work 
second  to  none  and  contained  the  entire  substance  of  philos- 
ophy.^ Macrobius  believed  that  numbers  possess  occult 
power.  He  dilated  at  considerable  length  upon  every  num- 
ber from  one  to  eight,  emphasizing  the  perfection  and  far- 
reaching  significance  of  each.  He  held  the  Pythagorean 
doctrine  that  the  world-soul  consists  of  number,  that  num- 
ber rules  the  harmony  of  the  celestial  bodies,  and  that  from 
the  music  of  the  spheres  we  derive  the  numerical  values 
proper  to  musical  consonance.^  His  opinion  was  that 
dreams  and  other  striking  occurrences  will  reveal  an  occult 
meaning  to  the  careful  investigator.^  As  for  astrology,  he 
regarded  the  stars  as  signs  but  not  causes  of  future  events, 
just  as  birds  by  their  flight  or  song  reveal  matters  of  which 
they  themselves  are  ignorant.'^  So  the  sun  and  other  planets, 
though  in  a  way  divine,  are  but  material  bodies,  and  it  is 
not  from  them  but  from  the  world-soul  (pure  mind),  whence 
they  too  come,  that  the  human  spirit  takes  its  origin.®     In 

*0n  Synesius  as  an  alchemist  Scipio,  II,  17,  "Universa  phi- 
see  Berthelot  (1885),  pp.  65,  188-  losophiae  integritas";  ed.  Nisard, 
90;  (1889),  p.  ix.  Paris,  1883. 

'T.  R.  Glover,  Life  and  Letters  "Ibid.,  I,  5-6;  II,  1-2. 

in  the  Fourth  Century  A.  D.,  Cam-  'Ibid.,  I,  7- 

bridge,  1901,  p.  187,  note  i.  ''Ibid.,  I,  19. 

*  Saturnalia,  I,  xvi,  I2.  "Ibid.,  I,  14. 

*  Commentary  on  the  Dream  of 


XXIII 


PAGAN  AND  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT 


545 


his  sole  other  extant  work,  the  Saturnalia,  Macrobius  dis- 
plays some  belief  in  occult  virtues  in  natural  objects,  as  when 
Disaurius  the  physician  answers  such  questions  as  why  a 
copper  knife  stuck  in  game  prevents  decay. ^ 

The  medieval  vogue  of  the  fifth  century  work  of  Marti- 
anus  Capella,  The  Nuptials  of  Philology  and  Mercury,  and 
the  Seven  Liberal  Arts,^  has  been  too  frequently  demon- 
strated to  require  further  emphasis  here,  although  it  is  still 
a  puzzle  just  why  a  monastic  Christian  world  should  have 
selected  for  a  text  book  in  the  liberal  arts  a  work  which  con- 
tained so  much  pagan  mythology,  to  say  nothing  of  a  mar- 
riage ceremony.  Nor  need  we  repeat  its  fulsome  allegorical 
plot  and  meager  learned  content.  Cassiodorus  tells  us  that 
the  author  was  a  native  of  Madaura,  the  birth-place  of  Apu- 
leius,  in  North  Africa,  and  he  appears  to  be  a  Neo-Platonist 
who  has  much  to  say  of  the  sky,  stars,  and  old  pagan  gods, 
often,  however,  by  way  of  brief  and  vague  poetical  allusion. 

Of  astrology  there  is  very  little  trace  in  Capella's  work. 
In  a  discussion  of  perfect  numbers  in  the  second  book  the 
number  seven  evokes  allusion  to  the  fatal  courses  of  the 
stars  and  their  influence  upon  the  formation  of  the  child  in 
the  womb ;  but  the  eighth  book,  which  is  devoted  to  the  theme 
of  astronomy  as  one  of  the  liberal  arts,  is  limited  to  a  purely 
astronomical  description  of  the  heavens. 

The  chief  thing  for  us  to  note  in  the  work  is  the  account 
of  the  various  orders  of  spiritual  beings  and  their  respective 
location  in  reference  to  the  heavenly  bodies.^  Juno  leads 
the  virgin  Philology  to  the  aerial  citadels  and  there  instructs 
her  in  the  multiplicity  of  diverse  powers.  From  highest 
ether  to  the  solar  circle  are  beings  of  a  fiery  and  flaming  sub- 
stance. These  are  the  celestial  gods  who  prepare  the  secrets 
of  occult  causes.  They  are  pure  and  impassive  and  immor- 
tal and  have  little  or  no  direct  relation  with  mankind.     Be- 


Martianus 
Capella. 


Absence 
of  as- 
trology. 


Orders  of 
spirits. 


*  Glover  (1901),  p.  178. 

*  De  nuptiis  philologiae  et  mer- 
curii  et  de  sept  em  artibus  Hberali- 
bus  libri  novem,  Lugduni  apud 
haeredes  Simonis  Vificentii,  1539; 


ed.  U.  F.  Kopp,  Frankfurt,  1836; 
ed.  F.  Eyssenhardt,  Leipzig,  1866. 
'  It  occurs  toward  the  close  of 
the  second  book. 


546  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

tween  sun  and  moon  come  spirits  who  have  especial  charge 
of  soothsaying,  dreams,  prodigies,  omens,  and  divination 
from  entrails  and  auguries.  They  often  utter  warning  voices 
or  admonish  those  who  consult  their  oracles  by  the  course 
of  the  stars  or  the  hurling  of  thunderbolts.  To  this  class 
belong  the  Genii  associated  with  individual  mortals  and 
angels  "who  announce  secret  thoughts  to  the  superior 
power."  All  these  the  Greeks  call  demons.  Their  splendor 
is  less  lucid  than  that  of  the  celestials,  but  their  bodies  are 
not  sufficiently  corporeal  to  enable  men  to  see  them.  Lares 
and  purer  human  souls  after  death  also  come  under  this  cate- 
gory. Between  moon  and  earth  the  spirits  subdivide  into 
three  classes.  In  the  upper  atmosphere  are  demi-gods. 
"These  have  celestial  souls  and  holy  minds  and  are  begotten 
in  human  form  to  the  profit  of  the  whole  world."  Such 
were  Hercules,  Ammon,  Dionysus,  Osiris,  Isis,  Triptolemus, 
and  Asclepius.  Others  of  this  class  become  sibyls  and  seers. 
From  mid-air  to  the  mountain-tops  are  found  heroes  and 
Manes.  Finally  the  earth  itself  is  inhabited  by  a  long-lived 
race  of  dwellers  in  woods  and  groves,  in  fountains  and  lakes 
and  streams,  called  Pans,  Fauns,  satyrs,  Silvani,  nymphs, 
and  by  other  names.  They  finally  die  as  men  do,  but  pos- 
sess great  power  of  foresight  and  of  inflicting  injury. ■■•  It 
is  evident  that  Capella's  spiritual  world  is  one  well  fitted 
for  astrology,  divination,  and  magic. 
TheCeles-  Very  different  are  the  orders  of  spirits  described  in 
ar^h^Zi'  ^^^  Celestial  Hierarchy,  supposed  to  be  the  work  of  Dio- 
Dionysius  nysius  the  Areopagite,  where  are  set  forth  nine  orders  of 
pagite.  spirits  in  three  groups  of  three  each :  Seraphim,  Cherubim, 
and  Thrones;  Dominions,  Virtues,  and  Powers;  Princes, 
Archangels,  and  Angels.  The  threefold  division  reminds 
us  of  Capella,  but  there  the  resemblance  ceases.  The  pseudo- 
Dionysius  takes  all  his  suggestions  from  the  Old  and  New 
Testaments,  rather  than  from  classical  mythology  and  such 
previous  classifications  of  spirits  as  that  of  Apuleius.     And 

*  In  Kopp's  edition  pp.  202-23  are  almost  entirely  taken  up  with  notes 
setting  forth  other  passages  in  the  classics  concerning  such  spirits. 


XXIII  PAGAN  AND  CHRISTIAN  THOUGHT  547 

while  his  starting  from  such  verses  of  the  Bible  as  "Every 
good  gift  and  every  perfect  gift  is  from  above,  descending 
from  the  Father  of  lights,"  and  "Jesus  Christ  the  true  light 
that  lighteth  every  man  that  cometh  into  the  world,"  and  his 
using  such  phrases  as  "archifotic  Father"  and  "thearchic 
ray,"  lead  us  to  expect  some  Gnostic-like  scheme  of  associa- 
tion of  the  spirits  with  the  various  heavens  and  celestial 
bodies,  in  fact  he  throughout  speaks  of  the  spirits  solely  as 
celestial  and  deiform  and  hypercosmic  minds,  and  unspeak- 
able and  sacred  enigmas  of  whose  invisibility,  transcend- 
ence, infinity,  and  incomprehensibility  any  description  can 
be  merely  symbolic  and  figurative.  Their  functions  seem 
to  consist  chiefly  in  contemplation  of  the  deity  or  their  su- 
perior orders  and  illumination  of  man  and  their  inferior 
orders.  They  are  not  specifically  associated  by  Dionysius 
with  the  celestial  bodies,  much  less  with  any  terrestrial  ob- 
jects, and  so  his  account  lays  no  foundation  for  magic  and 
astrology,  unless  as  its  transcendent  mysticism  might  pique 
some  curious  person  to  attempt  some  very  immaterial  vari- 
ety of  theurgy  and  sublimated  theosophy.  Although  the 
Pseudo-Dionysius  wrote  in  Greek,^  his  work  was  made  avail- 
able for  the  Latin  middle  ages  by  the  translation  of  John 
the  Scot  in  the  ninth  century.^ 

*  Greek  text  in  Migne,  PG  3,  119-370. 
'Migne,  PL  122,  1037-70. 


BOOK  III.  THE  EARLY  MIDDLE  AGES 

Chapter  24.    The  Story  of  Nectanebus. 

25.  Post-Classical  Medicine. 

26.  Pseudo-Literature  in  Natural  Science  of  the 

Early  Middle  Ages. 

27.  Other  Early  Medieval  Learning. 

28.  Arabic  Occult  Science  of  the  Ninth  Century. 

29.  Latin  Astrology  and   Divination,   Especially 

in  the  Ninth,   Tenth,   and   Eleventh  Cen- 
turies. 

"       30.     Gerbert  and  the  Introduction  of  Arabic  As- 
trology. 
31.     Anglo-Saxon,    Salernitan,    and    other    Latin 
Medicine  in  Manuscripts  from  the  Ninth  to 
the  Twelfth  Century. 

"       32.     Constantinus  Africanus. 

33.     Treatises  on  the  Arts  before  the  Introduction 
of  Arabic  Alchemy. 

"       34.     Marbod. 


549 


CHAPTER  XXIV 

THE  STORY  OF  NECTANEBUS 

OR 

THE  ALEXANDER  LEGEND  IN   THE  EARLY   MIDDLE  AGES  ^ 

The  Pseudo-Callisthenes — Its  unhistoric  character — Julius  Valerius 
— Oriental  versions — Medieval  epitomes  of  Julius  Valerius — Letters  of 
Alexander — Leo's  Historia  de  pracliis — Medieval  metamorphosis  of  an- 
cient tradition — Survival  of  magical  and  scientific  features — Who  was 
Nectanebus  ?— A  scientific  key-note — Magic  of  Nectanebus — Nectanebus 
as  an  astrologer — A  magic  dream — Lucian  on  Olympias  and  the  serpeht 
— More  dream-sending;  magic  transformation — An  omen  interpreted — 
The  birth  of  Alexander — The  death  of  Nectanebus — The  Amazons  and 
Gymnosophists — The  Letter  to  Aristotle. 

The  oldest  version  of  the  legend  or  romance  of  Alexan-  The 

der  is  naturally  believed  to  have  been  written  in  the  Greek  Cailis-' 

language  but  is  thought  to  have  been  produced  in  Egypt  thenes. 
at  Alexandria.    But  the  Greek  manuscripts  of  the  story  are 

*  The  following  bibliography  in-  thenes  and  other  writers.  D. 
eludes  the  editions  of  the  texts  Carrarioli,  La  leggenda  di  Ales- 
concerned  and  the  chief  critical  sandro  Magna,  1892.  G.  G.  Cillie, 
researches  in  the  field.  A.  Aus-  De  lulii  Valerii  epitoma  Oxonien- 
f eld,  Zur  Kritik  des  griechischen  si,  Strasburg,  1905.  _  G.  Favre, 
Alexanderromans ;  Untersuchung-  Recherches  sur  les  histoires  fabu- 
en  iiber  die  unechten  Telle  der  leuses  d'Alexandre  le  Grand,  in 
altesten  Ueberlieferung,  Karls-  Melanges  d'hist.  litt.,  II  (1856),  5- 
ruhe,  1894.  A.  Ausfeld  and  W.  184.  Ethe,  Alexanders  Zug  zur 
Kroll,  Der  griechische  Alexan-  Lebensquelle  ini  Lande  der  Fin- 
derroman,  Leipzig,  1907.  H.  sterniss,  in  Atti  dell'  Accadcniia  di 
Becker,  Die  Brahindnnen  in  der  Monaco,  1871.  B.  Kiibler,  Julius 
Alexandersage,  Konigsberg,  1889,  Valerius;  Res  gestae  Alexandri 
34  pp.  E.  A.  W.  Budge,  History  Maccdonis,  Leipzig,  1888  (see  pp. 
of  Alexander  the  Great,  Cam-  xxv-xxvi  for  further  bibliog- 
bridge  University  Press,  1889;  the  raphy).  Levi,  La  legende  d'Alex- 
Syriac  version  of  the  Pseudo-  aiidre  dans  le  Talmud,  in  Revue 
Co//ij^/i^n^^  edited  from  five  MSS,  des  Etudes  juives,  I  (1880), 
with  an  English  translation  and  293-300.  Meusel,  Pseudo-Callis- 
HOtes.  E.  A.  W.  Budge,  The  Life  thenes  nach  der  Leidener  Hand- 
and  Exploits  of  Alexander  the  schrift  herausgegeben,  Leipzig, 
Great,  Cambridge  University  1871.  M.  P.  H.  Meyer,  Alexandre 
Press,  1896;  Ethiopic  Histories  of  le  Grand  dans  la  litterature  fran- 
Alexander  by  the    Pseudo-Callis-  gaise  du  moyen  age,  2  vols.,  Paris, 

551 


552 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


all  of  the  medieval  or  Renaissance  period;  indeed,  none  of 
them  antedates  the  eleventh  or  twelfth  century.  Further- 
more, they  differ  very  considerably  in  content  and  arrange- 
ment, so  that  the  problem  of  distinguishing  or  recovering 
the  original  text  of  the  Pseudo-Callisthenes,  as  the  work  is 
commonly  called,  and  of  dating  it,  is  one  with  which  vari- 
ous scholars  have  grappled.  It  has  been  held  that  the  orig- 
inal Greek  text  which  lies  back  of  the  later  versions  was 
written  not  later  than  200  A.  D.  But  Basil,  writing  in 
Greek  in  the  fourth  century  and  well-versed  in  Greek  cul- 
ture, is  apparently  unfamiliar  with  the  story  of  Nectanebus, 
since  he  says,  "Without  doubt  there  has  never  been  a  king 
who  has  taken  measures  to  have  his  son  born  under  the  star 
of  royalty,"  ^  Fortunately  we  are  less  interested  in  the  orig- 
inal version  than  in  the  medieval  development  of  the  tradi- 
tion. It  should,  however,  perhaps  be  premised  that  certain 
features  of  the  Alexander  legend  may  be  detected  in  embryo 
in  Plutarch's  Life  of  him. 

the  Mechitarists,  Venice,  1842.  F. 
Pfister,  Kleine  Texte  zum  Alex- 
anderroman,  Heidelberg,  1910; 
Sammlung  vulgdrlateinischer  Tex- 
te herausg.  v.  W.  Heraeus  u.  H. 
Morf,  4  Heft.  Spiegel,  Die  Alex- 
andersage  bei  den  Orientalen, 
Leipzig,  1851.  Vogelstein,  Adno- 
tationes  quaedam  ex  litteris 
orientalibus  petitae  quae  de  Alex- 
andra Magna  circumferuntur, 
Warsaw,  1^5.  A.  Westermann, 
De  Callisthene  Olynthia  et 
Pseudo-Callisthene  Cammentatio, 
1 838- 1842.  J.  Zacher,  Pseudo- 
Callisthenes:  Forschungen  zur 
Kritik  und  Geschichte  der  dl- 
t  est  en  Aufscichnung  der  Alcxan- 
dersage,  Halle,  1867  (see  pp.  2-3 
for  further  bibliography  of  works 
written  before  1851).  J.  Zacher, 
Julii  Valerii  Epitome,  sum  ersten 
tnal  herausgcgeben,  Halle,   1867. 

^  Hexacmeron,  VI,  7.  On  the 
other  hand,  Augustine,  De  civitate 
dei,  V,  6-7,  alludes  to  the  sage  who 
selected  a  certain  hour  for  inter- 
course with  his  wife  in  order  that 
he  might  beget  a  marvelous  son. 


1886.  C.  Miiller,  Scriptores  rerum^ 
Alexandri  Magni,  Firmin-Didot, 
Paris,  1846  and  1877  (bound  with 
Arrian,  ed.  Fr.  Diibner)  ;  the  first 
edition  of  the  Greek  text  of  the 
Pseudo-Callisthenes  from  three 
Paris  MSS,  also  Julius  Valerius, 
etc.  Noeldeke,  Beitrdge  zur  Ge- 
schichte des  Alexanderromatis, 
Denkschriften  der  Kaiserlichen 
Akademie  der  Wissenschaften  in 
Wien,  Philos.  Hist.  Classe,  vol.  38, 
Vienna,  1890;  Budge  says  of  this 
work,  "Professor  Noeldeke  dis- 
cusses in  his  characteristic  mas- 
terly manner  the  Greek,  Syriac, 
Hebrew,  Persian,  and  Arabic  ver- 
sions, and  ably  shows  how  each  is 
related  to  the  other,  and  how 
certain  variations  in  the  narrative 
have  arisen.  No  other  writer  be- 
fore him  was  able  to  control,  by 
knowledge  at  first  hand,  the  state- 
ments of  both  the  Aryan  and 
Semitic  versions ;  his  work  is 
therefore  of  unique  value."  Pad- 
muthiun  Achcksandri  Makcto- 
nazwui,  I  Wenedig  i  dparani 
serbuin  Chazaru,  Hami,  1842;  the 
Armenian    version    published    by 


acter. 


XXIV  THE  STORY  OF  NECTANEBUS  553 

The  true  Callisthenes  was  a  historian  who  accompanied 
Alexander  upon  his  Asiatic  campaigns  but  then  offended  the 
conqueror  by  opposing  his  adoption  of  oriental  dress,  abso- 
lutism, and  deification,  and  was  therefore  cast  into  prison  on 
a  charge  of  treason,  and  there  died  in  328  B.  C.  either  from 
ill  treatment  or  disease.^  Since  Callisthenes  was  also  a 
relative  and  pupil  of  Aristotle,  his  name  was  an  excellent 
one  upon  which  to  father  the  romance.  However,  the  old- 
est Latin  version  of  it  professes  to  employ  a  Greek  text  by 
one  Aesopus,  possibly  because  Aesop's  fables  accompany  the 
story  of  Alexander  in  some  of  the  manuscripts.  Yet  other 
versions  cite  an  Onesicritus,^  and  the  Pseudo-CaUisthenes 
has  also  been  attributed  to  Antisthenes,  Aristotle,  and  Ar- 
rian. 

Perhaps  no  better  single  illustration  of  the  totally  un-  Its  unhis- 
historical  and  romantic  character  of  the  Pseudo-Callisthenes  j^"*;^  ^^" 
can  be  given  than  the  perversion  of  Alexander's  line  of 
march  in  most  of  the  Greek  and  all  of  the  Latin  versions. 
He  is  represented  as  first  proceeding  to  Italy  and  receiving 
royal  honors  at  Rome ;  then  he  goes  to  Carthage  and  reaches 
the  shrine  of  Ammon  by  traversing  Libya;  next  he  passes 
through  Egypt  into  Syria  and  destroys  Tyre,  after  which  he 
crosses  Arabia  and  has  his  first  battle  with  Darius.  Pres- 
ently he  is  found  back  in  Greece  sacking  Thebes  and  dealing 
with  Corinth,  Athens,  and  Sparta.  Then  his  Asiatic  con- 
quests are  resumed. 

The  oldest  Latin  version  of  the  Alexander  romance  is  Julius 
the  Res  gestae  Alexandri  Macedonis  of  Julius  Valerius. 
Who  he  was  and  when  he  lived  are  matters  still  veiled  in 
obscurity ;  but  it  is  customary  to  place  him  in  the  early  fourth 
century  on  the  basis  of  Zacher's  contention  that  the  Res  ges- 
tae is  copied  in  certain  portions  of  the  Itinerarium  Alexan- 
dri, which  was  written  during  the  years  340-345  A.  D.    This 

*  Seneca    in   the   Natural   Ques-  outweigh, — a    passage    which    did 

tions  (VI,  23)  called  the  death  of  not     keep     Nero     from     forcing 

Callisthenes  "the  eternal  crime"  of  Seneca  to  commit  suicide. 

Alexander  which  all  his  military  ^  Reitzenstein,  Pohnandres,  Leip- 

victories  and  conquests  could  not  zig,    1904,    pp.   308-309. 


Valerius. 


554  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

dating  would  also  serve  to  explain  why  Basil,  writing  in 
Greek  before  379,  had  never  heard  of  a  king  who  had  taken 
steps  to  have  his  son  born  under  the  star  of  royalty,  while 
Augustine,  writing  in  Latin  between  413  and  426,  men- 
tions the  story  of  a  sage  who  selected  a  certain  hour  for  in- 
tercourse with  his  wife  in  order  that  he  might  beget  a  mar- 
velous son.  This  would  also  suggest  that  the  Latin  version 
was  older  than  the  Greek,  as  in  fact  the  extant  manuscripts 
of  it  are.  The  oldest  manuscript  of  Valerius,  however,  is  a 
badly  damaged  palimpsest  of  the  seventh  century  at  Turin. 
Other  manuscripts  are  one  at  Milan  of  the  tenth  century 
and  another  at  Paris  dating  about  1200.^  The  text  of  Va- 
lerius differs  considerably  from  the  Greek  Pseudo-Callis- 
thenes  and  was  to  undergo  further  alteration  in  later  me- 
dieval Latin  versions. 

Before  speaking  of  these  we  may  mention  other  oriental 
versions  of  the  story.  An  Armenian  text  dates  from  the 
fifth  century.  A  Syriac  version,  which  dates  from  the  sev- 
enth or  eighth  century  and  was  "much  read  by  the  Nestori- 
ans,"  was  itself  derived  from  an  earlier  Persian  rendering. 
It  seems  to  make  use  of  both  the  Greek  Pseudo-Callisthenes 
and  Julius  Valerius  since  it  includes  incidents  from  either 
which  are  not  found  in  the  other.  And  it  omits  a  consider- 
able section  of  the  Greek  version  besides  adding  episodes 
which  are  not  found  in  it,  although  contained  in  Julius  Va- 
lerius. We  hear  further  of  Arabic  and  Hebrew  versions  of 
the  romance,  while  manuscripts  of  recent  date  supply  an 
Ethiopic  version  of  the  Pseudo-Callisthenes  of  unknown 
authorship  and  date,  together  with  other  Ethiopic  histories 
and  romances  of  Alexander.  These  are  based  partly  upon 
Arabic  and  Jewish  works  but  take  great  liberties  with  their 
sources  in  making  alterations  to  suit  a  Christian  audience, 
omitting  for  example,  as  Budge  points  out,  Alexander's  vic- 

^Res    gestae    of    Alexander    of  twelfth   centuries:    Royal    13-A-I, 

Macedon,  contained  in  three  MSS  Royal    12-C-IV,   and   Royal    15-C- 

of  the  Royal  Library  in  the  British  VI,  are  not  the  full  text  of  Julius 

Museum,  dating  according  to  the  Valerius,  but  the  epitome  of  which 

catalogue   from  the  eleventh   and  I  shall  soon  speak. 


XXIV 


THE  STORY  OF  NECTANEBUS 


555 


tory  in  the  chariot  race,  and  transforming  Philip  and  Alex- 
ander into  Christian  martyrs,  or  the  Greek  gods  into  patri- 
archs and  prophets  like  Enoch  and  Elijah.  Even  the  Greek 
version  did  not  remain  unaltered  in  the  Byzantine  period 
v^^hen  two  recensions  in  prose  and  two  more  in  verse  are  dis- 
tinguished. Indeed,  none  of  the  Greek  manuscripts  of  the 
work  antedates  the  eleventh  or  twelfth  century,  they  differ 
greatly,  and  some  of  them  ascribe  the  romance  to  Alexander 
himself. 

Such  variations  in  the  eastern  versions  of  the  story  of 
Alexander  illustrate  how  the  middle  ages  made  the  classical 
heritage  their  own  and  prepare  us  for  similar  alterations  in 
the  Latin  account  current  in  western  Europe.  The  work  of 
Julius  Valerius,  though  written  in  the  rhetorical  style  char- 
acteristic of  the  declining  Roman  Empire  and  composed  al- 
most on  the  verge  of  the  middle  ages,  was  to  undergo  fur- 
ther alterations  to  adapt  it  more  closely  to  medieval  taste  and 
use.  By  the  ninth  century,  if  not  earlier,  two  epitomes  of  it 
had  been  made,  and,  beginning  with  that  century,  manu- 
scripts of  the  shorter  of  these  epitomes  become  far  more 
numerous  than  those  of  the  original  Valerius.^ 

Two  sections  of  the  Alexander  legend  were  omitted  in 
the  Epitome,  not  because  medieval  men  had  lost  interest  in 
them  but  because  they  had  become  so  fond  of  them  as  to 
enlarge  upon  them  and  issue  them  as  distinct  works.  They 
often,  however,  accompany  the  Epitome  in  the  manuscripts. 
One  of  these  was  the  Letter  of  Alexander  to  Aristotle  on 
the  Marvels  of  India. ^    It  is  longer  than  the  corresponding 


*  The  longer  epitome  is  known 
from  an  Oxford  MS,  Corpus 
Christi  MS  82,  and  was  believed 
by  Meyer  to  be  intermediary  be- 
tween Valerius  and  the  other 
briefer  epitome.  Cillie,  however, 
tries  to  prove  the  shorter  epitome 
to  be  the  older. 

' Alexandri  Magni  Epistola  ad 
Aristoteletn  de  mirabilibus  Indiae, 
first  printed  with  Synesii  Epis- 
tolae,  graece:  adcedunt  aliorum 
Epistolae,     Venice,      1499;      then 


Bologna,  1501;  Basel,  1517;  Paris, 
1520,  fols.  I02V-I4V,  following  the 
Pseudo-Aristotle,  Secret  of  Se- 
crets; etc.  These  early  printed 
editions  give  the  oldest  Latin  text, 
dating  back  as  we  have  seen  to 
at  least  800. 

Some  MSS  of  the  same  version 
are : 

BM  Royal  13-A-I,  fols.  5iv-78r, 
a  beautifully  clear  MS  of  the  late 
nth  century  with  clubbed  strokes. 
The   Epistola  is   preceded   by  the 


Medieval 
epitomes 
of  Julius 
Valerius. 


Letters 
of  Alex- 
ander. 


556  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

chapter  of  Valerius  ^  where  a  letter  of  Alexander  to  Aris- 
totle is  quoted  and  also  differs  from  any  known  Greek  text. 
The  fact  that  reference  is  made  to  it  in  the  longer  Epitome 
leads  to  the  conclusion  that  the  Letter  is  older.  This  would 
also  seem  to  be  the  case  with  the  other  work,  a  short  series 
of  letters  interchanged  between  Alexander  and  Dindimus, 
the  king  of  the  Brahmans,  since  the  Epitome  omits  the  two 
chapters  of  Valerius  which  tell  of  Alexander's  interview 
with  the  Brahmans.  It  is  believed  that  Alcuin,  who  died  in 
804,  in  one  of  his  letters  to  Charlemagne  speaks  of  sending 
these  epistles  exchanged  between  Alexander  and  Dindimus 
along  with  the  equally  apocryphal  correspondence  of  the 
apostle  Paul  and  the  philosopher  Seneca.  No  such  letters  are 
found  in  the  Pseudo-Callisthenes,  for  the  ten  chapters  on 
the  Brahmans  found  in  one  Greek  codex  are  interpolated 
from  the  treatise  of  Palladius,  likewise  in  the  form  of  a 
correspondence.^  Julius  Valerius  does  not  even  mention 
Dindimus,  but  a  third  epistolary  discussion  of  the  Brahmans 
exists  in  Latin,  De  moribus  Brachnmnnorum,  ascribed  to  St. 
Ambrose.^ 

Epitome  of  Valerius  and  followed  and    followed    at    fol.    97   by   the 

by  the  correspondence  with  Din-  Dindimus. 

dimus.  In  the  library  of  Eton  College 

Royal  12-C-IV,  I2th  century.  an  imperfect  copy  of  the  Epistola 

Royal  15-C-VI,  i2th  century.  follows  Orosius  in  a  MS  of  the 

Cotton  Nero  D  VIII,  fol.  169.  early   13th  century,   133,  BL  4,  6, 

Sloane  1619,  13th  century,  fols.  fols.  Ssr-S/. 

12-17.  A  somewhat  different  and  later 

Arundel  242,  15th  century,  fols.  version  of  the  Letter  to  Aristotle 

160-83.  was  published  in   1910  at  Heidel- 

BL  Laud.  Misc.  247,   12th  cen-  berg  by  Friedrich  Pfister  from  a 

tury,  fol.  186;  preceded  at  fol.  171  Bamberg    MS    of    the    nth    cen- 

by  the  "Ortus  vita  et  obitus  Alex-  tury,  together  with  Palladius  and 

andri    Macedonis,"    and    followed  the    correspondence    with    Dindi- 

at  fol.  196V  by  the  letter  to  Din-  mus.     Pfister  believed  all  these  to 

dimus.  be  translations   from  the   Greek. 

BN  MSS  2874,  4126,  4877,  4880,  An  Anglo-Saxon  version  of  the 

5062,  6121,  6365,  6503,  6831,  7561,  Letter  to  Aristotle  was  edited  by 

8518,  8521  A,  Epistola  de  itinere  et  Cockayne  in  1861  (see  T.  Wright, 

situ   Indiae;   8607,   Epistolae   eius  RS  34;  xxvii). 

nomine      scriptae;      and      269SA,  *  III,  17. 

6186,  6365,  6385,  6811,  6831,  8501A,  'First     published     by    Joachim 

for  Responsio  ad  Dindimum.  Camerarius  about   1571. 

CLM    11319,    13th    century,    fol.  'Published    with    Palladius    by 

88,    Alexandri    epistola    ad    Aris-  Sir  Edward  Bisse  in   1665;  MSS 

totelem  de  rebus  in  India  gestis,  are  numerous, 
preceded  at  fol.  72  by  the  Epitome 


XXIV 


THE  STORY  OF  NECTANEBUS 


557 


Leo,  an  archpriest  of  Naples,  who  went  to  Constanti- 
nople about  941-944  on  an  embassy  for  two  dukes  of  Cam- 
pania, John  and  Marinus,  brought  back  with  him  a  History 
containing  the  conflicts  and  victories  of  Alexander  the  Great, 
King  of  Macedon.  Later  Duke  John,  who  was  fond  of  sci- 
ence, had  Leo  translate  this  work  from  Greek  into  Latin, 
in  which  tongue  it  is  entitled  Historia  de  praeliis.  We  learn 
these  facts  from  its  prologue  which  is  found  only  in  the 
oldest  extant  manuscript,  a  Bamberg  codex  of  the  eleventh 
century,^  and  in  a  manuscript  of  the  twelfth  or  thirteenth 
century  at  Munich.  The  location  of  these  two  manuscripts 
suggests  that  the  work  was  early  carried  from  Italy  to  Ger- 
many, lands  then  connected  in  the  Holy  Roman  Empire.  Of 
the  De  praeliis  apart  from  the  prologue  there  came  to  be 
many  copies,  but  most  of  them  date  from  the  later  middle 
ages,  and  the  importance  of  the  work  as  a  source  for  the 
vernacular  romances  of  Alexander  has  been  somewhat  over- 
estimated, since  Meyer  has  shown  that  no  manuscript  of  it 
is  found  in  France  until  the  thirteenth  century  and  since  the 
manuscripts  of  the  Epitome  are  far  more  numerous.^ 

In  the  foregoing  observations  we  may  seem  to  have  di- 
gressed too  far  from  our  main  theme  of  science  and  magic 
into  the  domain  of  literary  history.  But  the  development  of 
the  Alexander  legend,  which  happens  to  have  been  traced 
more  thoroughly  than  perhaps  any  other  one  thread  in  the 
medieval  metamorphosis  of  ancient  tradition,  throws  light 
at  least  by  analogy  upon  many  matters  in  which  we  are  in- 
terested :  the  state  of  medieval  manuscript  material,  the 
continuity  and  yet  the  alteration  of  ancient  culture  during 
the  early  middle  ages,  the  process  of  translation  from  the 
Greek  which  went  on  even  then,  and  the  varying  rapidity 
or  slowness  with  which  books  circulated  and  ideas  perme- 
ated. 


Leo's  His- 
toria de 
praeliis. 


*  From  this  same  MS  Pfister 
published  the  Letter  to  Aristotle 
and  other  treatises  mentioned 
above. 

'  Its  influence  would  therefore 
seem  to  have  been  upon  the  later 


prose  romances  and  not  upon 
French  vernacular  poetry.  Known 
at  first  only  in  Italy  and  Ger- 
many, its  popularity  became  gen- 
eral in  western  Europe  toward 
the  close  of  the  middle  ages. 


Medieval 
metamor- 
phosis of 
ancient 
tradition. 


558 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap- 


Survival 
of  magi- 
cal and 
scientific 
features. 


Who  was 
Nectane- 
bus? 


Moreover,  the  story  of  Alexander,  especially  as  adapted 
by  the  middle  ages,  contained  a  large  amount  of  magic  and 
science,  more  especially  the  former.  The  Epitome  might 
omit  a  great  deal  else,  but  it  kept  intact  the  opening  portion 
of  the  Pseudo-Callisthenes  and  of  Julius  Valerius  concern- 
ing the  adventures  of  Nectanebus,  the  sage  and  magician 
from  Egypt,  the  astrologer  and  the  natural  father  of  Alex- 
ander, Indeed,  the  titles  in  some  manuscripts  suggest  that 
Nectanebus  came  to  rival  Alexander  for  medieval  readers  as 
the  hero  of  the  story.  Thus  we  find  a  History  of  Alexander, 
King  of  Macedon,  and  of  Nectanebo,  King'  of  Egypf,^  or 
an  account  Of  the  Life  and  Deeds  of  Neptanabus,  astrono- 
mer of  Egypt/  or  a  Latin  metrical  version  by  "Uilikinus" 
or  Aretinus  Quilichinus  of  Spoleto  in  1236  entitled.  The 
History  of  the  Science  of  the  Egyptians  and  of  Neptana- 
bus their  king  who  afterwards  was  the  true  father  of  Alex- 
ander.^ 

Pliny  in  the  Natural,  History  describes  the  obelisk  of 
Necthebis,  king  of  Egypt,  whom  he  places  five  centuries  be- 
fore Alexander  the  Great.*  Plutarch,  however,  in  his  life 
of  Agesilaus  and  Nepos  in  his  life  of  Chabrias  mention  a 
Nectanebus  II  who  struggled  against  Persia  for  the  throne 
of  Egypt  about  361  B.  C.  and  later  was  forced  to  flee  to 
Ethiopia.  In  the  Alexander  romance,  however,  it  is  to 
Macedon  that  Nectanebus  retreats.  A  Nectabis  is  listed  as 
a  magician  along  with  Ostanes,  Typhon,  Dardanus,  Dami- 
geron,  and  Berenice,  by  Tertullian,  writing  about  200  A.  D.^ 
As  a  matter  of  fact,  in  the  Thirtieth  Dynasty  were  two  kings 
named  respectively  Nektanebes  or  Nekht-Har-ehbet,  who 
ruled  378  to  361  B.  C,  and  Nektanebos  or  Nekhte-nebof, 
who  ruled  358  to  341  B.  C.     Both  have  left  considerable 


*  Harleian  527,  fols.  47-S6. 

^Amplon.  Quarto  12,  fols.  200- 
201 ;  presumably  it  includes  only 
those  chapters  concerned  with 
Nectanebus. 

'CUL  1429  (Gg.  I,  34),  14th 
century,  No.  5,  35  fols.  Also  in 
CU    Trinity    1041,    14th    century, 


fols.     200V-2I2V, 

mago     quomodo 


"De    Nectanabo 
magnum    genu- 
erit  Alexandrum.     Egipti  sapien- 
tes         ." 
*  NH  XXXVI,  14  and  19. 
^  De  anitna,  cap.  57,   in  Migne, 
PL  II,  792. 


XXIV  THE  STORY  OF  NECTANEBUS  559 

buildings.^  It  is  the  latter  who  was  forced  by  the  Persians 
to  flee  to  Ethiopia  nine  years  before  Alexander  conquered 
Egypt  and  who  is  the  hero  of  our  story.  The  stele  of  Met- 
temich  is  covered  with  magical  formulae  ascribed  to  Nec- 
tanebo.^ 

A  note  suggestive  of  both  natural  science  and  occult  sci-  A  scien- 
ence  is  struck  by  the  opening  passage  of  the  Latin  epitomes  note.  ^^' 
and  of  the  oldest  Greek  manuscript ;  the  first  page  of  Julius 
Valerius  is  missing  and  has  to  be  supplied  from  the  epitomes. 
The  first  words  are  "The  Egyptian  sages,"  and  the  first  sen- 
tence describes  their  scientific  ability  in  measuring  the  earth 
and  in  tracing  the  revolutions  of  the  heavens  and  numbering 
the  stars.  "And  of  them  all  Nectanabus  is  recognized  to 
have  been  the  most  prudent  .  .  .  for  the  elements  of  the 
universe  obeyed  him."  In  the  opening  sentences  of  the 
oldest  Greek  version  and  of  the  Ethiopic  version  even  more 
emphasis  is  laid  than  in  the  Epitomes  upon  the  learning  of 
the  Egyptians  in  general  and  of  Nectanebus  in  particular, 
and  of  the  close  connection  of  that  learning  with  astrology 
and  magic.^  We  read,  "Now  there  lived  in  the  land  of 
Egypt  a  king  who  was  called  Bektanis,  and  he  was  a  famous 
magician  and  a  sage,  and  he  was  deeply  learned  in  the  wis- 
dom of  the  Egyptians.  And  he  had  more  knowledge  than 
all  the  wise  men  who  knew  what  was  in  the  depths  of  the 
Nile  and  in  the  abysses,  and  who  were  skilled  in  the  knowl- 
edge of  the  stars  and  of  their  seasons  and  in  the  knowledge 
of  the  astrolabe  and  in  the  casting  of  nativities.  .  .  .  And  by 
his  learning  and  by  his  observations  of  the  stars  Nectanebus 
was  able  to  predict  what  would  befall  anyone  who  was  about 
to  be  born."  ^  In  one  Latin  manuscript  of  the  fifteenth  cen- 
tury the  History  of  Alexander  the  Great  begins  with  the 

^  The  former  built  a  Temple  of  tanebos  before  the  Temple  of  the 

Isis,    now    a    heap    of    ruins,    at  Eighteenth    Dynasty    at    Medinet 

Behbit  el-Hagar  and  a  colonnade  Habu. 

to    the    Temple    of    Hibis    in    the  '  Berthelot  (1885),  pp.  29-30. 

oasis   of   Khirgeh ;   and  his  name  ^  The    Syriac    version,    on    the 

appears  upon  a  gate  in  the  Temple  contrary,    emphasizes    this    point 

of  Mont  at  Karnak.     Besides  the  less. 

Vestibule       of       Nektanebos      at  *  Budge's     translation     of     the 

Philae  there  is  a  court  of   Nek-  Ethiopic  version. 


56o 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Magic  of 
Nectane- 
bus. 


Nectane- 
bus  as  an 
astrologer. 


sentence,  "Books  tell  us  how  powerful  the  race  of  the 
Egyptians  were  in  mathematics  and  the  magic  art."  ^ 

Next  we  are  told,  and  the  account  Is  practically  the  same 
in  all  the  versions  of  the  story,  how  by  means  of  his  basin 
filled  with  water,  his  wax  images  of  ships  and  men,  his  rod  or 
wand  of  ebony,  and  the  incantations  with  which  he  addressed 
the  gods  above  and  below,  Nectanebus  had  been  hitherto  able 
to  destroy  all  the  armies  and  to  sink  all  the  fleets  that  had 
come  against  him.  But  when  one  day  he  found  his  magic 
unavailing  to  save  him,  he  shaved  his  head  and  beard  and  fled 
to  Macedon,  where  in  linen  garb  he  plied  the  trade  of  an 
astrologer. 

In  this  he  soon  became  so  celebrated  that  the  fame  of  his 
predictions  reached  the  ears  of  the  queen  Olympias,  who  con- 
sulted him  during  an  absence  of  Philip.  When  she  asked 
Nectanebus  by  means  of  what  art  he  divined  the  future  so 
truthfully,  he  answered  that  there  were  many  varieties  of 
divination.  Julius  Valerius  and  the  Latin  epitomes  mention 
specifically  only  interpreters  of  dreams  and  astrologers,  but 
the  Greek,  Syriac,  and  Ethiopic  versions  give  more  elab- 
orate lists  of  various  kinds  of  diviners.^  Nectanebus  next 
produced  an  astrological  tablet  adorned  with  gold  and  ivory 
and  with  each  planet  and  the  horoscope  represented  by  a  dif- 
ferent stone  or  metal.     With  the  aid  of  this  he  read  the 


*CLM  215,  fols.  176-94,  "Egip- 
tiorum  gentem  in  mathematica 
magica  quam  in  arte  fuisse  valen- 
tem  littere  tradunt." 

^  Pseudo-Callisthenes,  1,  4,  "cast- 
ers of  horoscopes,  readers  of 
signs,  interpreters  of  dreams, 
ventriloquists,  augurs,  genethli- 
alogists,  the  so-called  magi  to 
whom  divination  is  an  open  book." 
Budge,  Syriac  version,  p.  4,  "The 
interpreters  of  dreams  are  of 
many  kinds  and  the  knowers  of 
signs,  those  who  understand 
divination,  Chaldean  augurs  and 
casters  of  nativities ;  the  Greeks 
call  the  signs  of  the  zodiac  'sor- 
cerers' ;  and  others  are  counters 
of  the  stars.  As  for  me,  all  of 
these  are  in  my  hands  and  I  my- 


self am  an  Egyptian  prophet,  a 
magus,  and  a  counter  of  the 
stars."  Budge,  Ethiopic  Histories, 
p.  II,  "Then  Nectanebus  answered 
and  said  unto  her,  'Yea.  Those 
who  have  knowledge  of  the  orbs 
of  heaven  are  of  many  kinds. 
Some  are  interpreters  of  dreams, 
and  some  have  knowledge  of 
what  shall  happen  in  the  future, 
and  some  understand  omens,  and 
some  cast  nativities,  and  there 
are  besides  all  those  who  know 
magic  and  who  are  renowned  be- 
cause they  are  learned  in  their 
art,  and  some  are  skilled  in  the 
motion  of  the  stars  of  heaven : 
but  I  have  full  knowledge  of  all 
these  things.' " 


XXIV 


THE  STORY  OF  NECTANEBUS 


561 


queen's  horoscope  and  told  her  that  she  would  have  a  son 
by  the  God  Ammon  and  w^ould  be  forewarned  soon  to  that 
effect  in  a  dream.  Olympias  replied  that  if  such  a  dream 
came  to  her,  she  would  no  longer  employ  Nectanebus  as  a 
magus  but  honor  him  as  a  god. 

Nectanebus  thereupon  sought  for  herbs  useful  to  com- 
mand dreams,  plucked  them,  and  pressed  a  syrup  out  of  them. 
He  placed  a  wax  image  of  the  queen  inscribed  with  her  name 
upon  a  little  couch,  lighted  lamps,  and  poured  his  syrup  over 
the  wax  figure,  muttering  a  secret  and  efficacious  incanta- 
tion the  while.  By  this  means  he  brought  it  about  that  the 
queen  would  dream  or  think  she  dreamed  whatever  he  said 
to  the  wax  image  of  her.  Later  Nectanebus  himself  played 
the  part  of  the  god  Ammon,  announcing  his  coming  before- 
hand to  Olympias  by  making  by  his  "science"  a  dragon 
which  glided  into  her  presence. 

Lucian  of  Samosata  in  the  second  century  tells  us  that 
it  was  a  common  story  in  his  time  that  Olympias  had  lain 
with  a  serpent  before  giving  birth  to  Alexander.  He  sug- 
gests as  the  explanation  of  how  this  tale  originated  the  fact 
that  at  Pella  in  Macedonia  there  is  a  breed  of  large  serpents, 
"so  tame  and  gentle  that  women  make  pets  of  them,  children 
take  them  to  bed,  they  will  let  you  tread  on  them,  have  no 
objection  to  being  squeezed,  and  will  draw  milk  from  the 
breasts  like  infants.  ...  It  was  doubtless  one  of  these  that 
was  her  bedfellow."  ^  As  is  apt  to  be  the  case  in  ancient 
efforts  to  give  a  natural  explanation  of  what  purports  to  be 
miraculous  or  supernatural,  Lucian's  biology  is  only  slightly 
less  incredible  than  Nectanebus's  magic  transformations. 

As  the  queen  became  pregnant,  "Nectanebus  consecrated 
a  hawk  and  told  it  to  go  to  Philip,"  who  was  still  absent,  "to 
stand  by  him  through  the  night  and  to  instruct  him  in  a 
dream  as  it  was  ordered."  ^    The  vision  in  question  was  ex- 


^  From  Fowler's  translation  of 
Alexander:  the  False  Prophet. 
See  also  Plutarch's  Alexander. 

'  The  Syriac  and  Ethiopic  ver- 
sions are  somewhat  more  de- 
tailed as  to  the   magic  by  which 


Philip's  dream  was  produced. 
Budge,  Syriac  version,  p.  8,  "Then 
Nectanebus  .  .  .  brought  a  hawk 
and  muttered  over  it  his  charms 
and  made  it  fly  away  with  a  small 
Quantity  of  a  drug,  and  that  night 


A  magic 
dream. 


Lucian  on 
Olympias 
and  the 
serpent. 


More 
dream- 
sending  : 
magic 
transfor- 
mation. 


S62 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


An  omen 
inter- 
preted. 


The 
birth  of 
Alex- 
ander. 


plained  by  an  interpreter  of  dreams  to  Philip  as  signifying 
that  his  wife  would  have  a  son  by  the  god  Ammon.  Never- 
theless Philip  was  somewhat  suspicious  and  hastened  to 
bring  his  wars  to  a  close  and  hurry  home.  Nectanebus,  how- 
ever, rendering  himself  invisible  by  means  of  the  magic  art, 
continued  to  deceive  both  king  and  queen.  Once  he  terri- 
fied the  court  by  appearing  again  in  the  form  of  a  huge  hiss- 
ing serpent,  but  put  his  head  in  Olympias's  lap  and  then 
kissed  her.  Thereupon  he  turned  from  a  serpent  into  an 
eagle  and  flew  away.  Philip  was  then  really  convinced  that 
his  wife's  lover  was  the  god  Ammon. 

Before  the  birth  of  Alexander  the  following  omen  befell 
Philip.  As  he  sat  absorbed  in  thought  in  a  place  where  there 
were  many  birds  flying  about,  one  of  them  laid  an  egg  in  his 
lap.  It  rolled  to  the  ground,  the  shell  broke,  and  a  snake 
issued  forth.  It  circled  about  the  egg-shell  but  when  it 
tried  to  reenter  the  shell  was  prevented  by  death.  When 
Antiphon,  the  interpreter  of  omens,  was  consulted  concern- 
ing this  portent,  he  said  that  it  signified  that  a  son  should  be 
born  who  would  conquer  the  world  but  die  before  he  could 
regain  his  native  land. 

The  day  of  Olympias's  delivery  now  approached  and 
Nectanebus,  in  his  office  of  astrologer,  stood  by  her  side  to 
tell  her  when  the  favorable  moment  had  arrived  for  the  birth 
of  her  child.  Once  he  urged  her  to  wait,  since  a  child  bom 
at  that  moment  would  be  a  slave  and  a  captive.  Again  he 
bade  her  restrain  herself,  for  at  that  moment  an  effeminate 
would  be  born.  At  last  the  favorable  instant  came  for  the 
birth  of  a  world  conqueror,  and  Alexander  was  born  amid 
an  earthquake,  thunder,  and  lightning.  In  this  case,  there- 
fore, the  moment  of  birth  is  regarded  as  controlling  the  des- 
tiny. Many  astrologers,  however,  considered  the  moment 
of  conception  as  of  greater  importance;  we  have  already 


it  shewed  Philip  a  dream." 
Budge,  Ethiopic  Histories,  p.  21, 
"Then  Nectanebus  took  a  swift 
bird  and  muttered  over  it  certain 
charms  and  names,  and  ...  in 
one  day  and  one  night  it  traversed 


many  lands  and  countries  and 
seas,  and  it  came  to  Philip  by 
night  and  stopped.  And  it  came 
to  pass  at  that  very  hour  .  .  . 
that  Philip  saw  a  marvelous 
dream." 


XXIV  THE  STORY  OF  NECTANEBUS  563 

heard  Augustine  tell  of  the  sage  who  chose  a  certain  hour 
for  intercourse  with  his  wife  in  order  to  beget  a  marvelous 
son;  and  in  the  thirteenth  century  Albertus  Magnus,  in  his 
treatise  on  animals,  informs  us  that  "Nectanebus,  the  natural 
father  of  Alexander,  in  having  intercourse  with  his  mother 
Olympias,  observed  the  time  when  the  sun  was  entering  Leo 
and  Saturn  was  in  Taurus,  since  he  wished  his  son  to  receive 
the  form  and  power  of  those  planets."  ^ 

The  death  of  Nectanebus  was  as  closely  in  accord  with    The 
the  stars  as  was  the  birth  of  Alexander.     At  the  age  of    Nectane- 
twelve  Alexander  found  Nectanebus  in  consultation  with  bus. 
Olympias  and,  attracted  by  his  astrological  tablet,  made  him 
promise  to  show  him  the  stars  at  night.    Then  as  Nectanebus 
walked  along  star-gazing,  Alexander  pushed  him  into  a  steep 
pit  which  they  chanced  to  pass,  and  Nectanebus  lay  there  with 
a  broken  neck.     When  he  asked  Alexander  the  reason  for 
his  act,  the  boy  replied  that  it  was  in  order  to  convince  him 
of  the  futility  of  his  art,  since  he  gazed  at  the  stars  unmind- 
ful of  what  threatened  him  from  the  ground.    But  Nectane- 
bus rebuts  this  revised  version  of  the  maid  servant's  taunt 
to  Thales  by  telling  Alexander  that  he  had  been  forewarned 
by  the  stars  that  he  should  be  killed  by  his  own  son,  and  by 
revealing  to  Alexander  the  secret  of  his  birth.^ 

In  concluding  the  story  of  Nectanebus  it  is  perhaps  worth 
while  to  emphasize  the  fact  that  the  epitomes  and  Julius 
Valerius  often  use  the  word  magus  of  Nectanebus  as  an  as- 
trologer and  that  in  general  magic,  astrology,  and  divina- 
tion are  indissolubly  connected. 

^  In     another     place,     however,  Nectanebus  into  the  pit,  but  only 

Albert    calls    Philip    Alexander's  fulfills    it.      In    the    Ethiopia   ver- 

father,  De  causis  et  proprietatibus  sion  Nectanebus  is  represented  as 

elementorum    et    planetarum,    II,  educating     Alexander     from     his 

ii,  I.  seventh    year    on    in    "philosophy 

'  The  story  is  better  told  in  the  and  letters  and  the  working  of 
Syriac  version  (Budge,  14-17),  magic  and  the  stars  and  their 
where  Alexander  does  not  push  seasons."  Aristotle  becomes  Alex- 
Nectanebus  into  the  pit  until  after  ander's  tutor  only  after  the  death 
he  has  asked  the  astrologer  if  he  of  Nectanebus.  Aristotle,  too,  is 
knows  his  own  fate  and  has  been  represented  as  an  adept  in  as- 
told  that  Nectanebus  is  to  be  slain  trology,  amulets,  and  the  use  of 
by  his  own  son.  Alexander  then  magic  wax  images.  (Budge, 
attempts  to   foil   fate  by  pushing  Ethiopic  Histories,  pp.   31,   xlv). 


564 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


The  Ama- 
zons and 
Gymno- 
sophists. 


The  letter 
to  Aris- 
totle. 


Some  account  is  given  both  in  Julius  Valerius  and  the 
longer  epitome  of  Alexander's  exchange  of  letters  with  the 
Amazons  and  of  questions  which  he  put  to  the  Gymnoso- 
phists  of  India  (i.  e.  the  Brahmans)  and  their  replies.  Nei- 
ther of  these  promising  themes,  however,  results  in  the  in- 
troduction of  any  magic  or  occult  science.  We  also  find  in 
the  Stromata  of  Clement  of  Alexandria  ^  a  list  of  ten  ques- 
tions which  Alexander  propounded  to  ten  of  the  Gymnoso- 
phists  of  India  and  their  ingenious  answers  given  under 
pain  of  death  if  their  responses  proved  unsatisfactory. 

Nor  does  Alexander's  letter  to  Aristotle  on  the  marvels 
of  India  reveal  many  specific  instances  of  superstition  that 
are  at  all  interesting.  For  the  most  part  it  recounts  his 
marches,  the  sufferings  of  his  army  from  thirst,  combats 
with  wild  beasts,  serpents,  and  hippopotamuses,  and  the 
treasures  which  he  captured.  Alexander  states  that  "in  for- 
mer letters  I  informed  you  about  the  eclipse  of  the  sun  and 
moon  and  the  constancy  of  the  stars  and  the  signs  of  the 
air."  ^  He  tells  now,  however,  of  a  place  where  there  are  two 
trees  of  the  sun  and  moon,  speaking  Indian  and  Greek,  one 
masculine  and  the  other  feminine,  from  which  one  may  learn 
what  the  future  has  in  store  for  good  or  evil.  As  to  this 
Alexander  was  inclined  to  be  incredulous,  but  the  natives 
swore  that  it  was  true,  and  his  companions  urged  him  "not 
to  be  defrauded  of  the  experience  of  so  great  a  thing."  Ac- 
cordingly he  made  his  way  to  the  spot  despite  the  innumer- 
able beasts  and  snakes  which  beset  his  path.  Chastity  was 
essential  in  order  to  approach  the  trees,  and  he  also  had  to 
lay  aside  his  rings,  royal  robes,  and  shoes.  The  sun  tree 
then  told  him  at  dawn  that  he  would  never  see  home  or  his 
mother  and  sisters  again.  At  eventide  the  moon  tree  added 
that  he  would  die  at  Babylon.^    The  third  and  final  response, 


'VI,  4. 

'Royal  13-A-I,  fol.  53V. 

Mn  CU  Trinity  1446  (1250 
A.  D.)  The  Romance  of  Alex- 
ander in  French  verse  by  Eu- 
stache  (or  Thomas)  of  Kent, 
among     152     pictures     listed     by 


James  (III,  483-91)  are  two  rep- 
resenting the  hero's  colloquy  with 
the  moon  tree  (fol.  3ir).  Marco 
Polo  also  tells  of  these  marvelous 
trees.  And  see  Roux  de  Rochelle, 
"Notice  sur  I'Arbre  du  Soleil,  ou 
Arbre  Sec,  decrit  dans  la  relation 


XXIV  THE  STORY  OF  NECTANEBUS  565 

vouchsafed  by  the  sun  tree,  was  that  his  death  would  be 
from  poison,  but  the  name  of  the  poisoner  the  oracular  tree 
refused  to  divulge  lest  Alexander  try  to  kill  him  first  and 
thus  cheat  the  three  Fates.  Alexander  has  consequently  had 
to  content  himself,  as  he  informs  Aristotle  in  the  closing  sen- 
tence of  his  letter,  with  building  a  monument  to  perpetuate 
his  name  among  all  mortals.^ 

Of  other  spurious  treatises  ascribed  to  Alexander  in  the 
middle  ages,  works  of  alchemy  and  works  of  astrology,  we 
shall  treat  in  a  later  chapter  on  the  Pseudo-Aristotle. 

des  voyages  de  Marco   Polo,"   in  edition   and   Royal   13-A-I,   which 

Bulletin    de    la   Societe   de   geog-  follow    the    early    Latin    version. 

raphie,   serie   3,   III    (1845),    187-  As   stated  above,   Pfister's  edition 

94.  (Heidelberg,    1910)    gives   a   later 

^  For  the  Letter  to  Aristotle  I  version  probably  translated   from 

have    employed    the    Paris,    1520  the  Greek, 


CHAPTER  XXV 

POST-CLASSICAL   MEDICINE 

Three  representatives  of  post-classical  medicine — Bibliographical 
note — Medical  compendiums :  Oribasius  and  Paul  of  Aegina — Aetius 
of  Amida — How  superstitious  are  Aetius  and  Alexander  of  Tralles? — 
Compound  medicines — Aetius  merely  reproduces  the  superstition  of 
Galen — Occult  science  mixed  with  some  scepticism — Alexander  of 
Tralles — Originality  of  his  work — His  medieval  influence — His  per- 
sonal experience — Extent  of  his  superstition — Physica — Occult  virtue 
of  substances  applied  externally — Other  things  used  as  ligatures  and 
amulets — Astrology  and  sculpture  of  rings — Incantations — Conjura- 
tion of  an  herb — Medieval  version  seems  less  superstitious  than  the 
original  text — Marcellus:  date  and  identity — "Marcellus  Empiricus" — 
Superstitious  character  of  his  medicine — Preparation  of  goat's  blood 
— A  rabbit's  foot — Magic  transfer  of  disease — Pliny  and  Marcellus 
compared  on  green  lizards  as  eye-cures — More  lizardry — Use  of  stones 
and  an  herb — Right  and  left:  number — Incantations  and  characters — 
The  art  of  medicine  survives  the  barbarian  invasions. 


Three 
repre- 
sentatives 
of  post- 
classical 
medicine. 


In  this  chapter  as  representatives  of  post-classical  medicine 
and  its  influence  upon  medieval  Latin  medicine  we  shall 
consider  three  writers  whose  works  date  from  the  close  of 
the  fourth  to  the  middle  of  the  sixth  century,  Marcellus  of 
Bordeaux  or  Marcellus  Empiricus,  Aetius  of  Amida  in 
Mesopotamia,  and  Alexander  of  Tralles  in  Asia  Minor.-^ 
They  have  just  been  mentioned  in  their  chronological  order, 

*  There  appears  to  have  been  no 
complete  edition  of  Aetius  in 
Greek.  The  first  eight  of  his  six- 
teen books  were  printed  at  Venice 
in  1534,  and  the  ninth  at  Leipzig 
in  1757,  but  for  the  entire  sixteen 
books  one  must  use  the  Latin 
translation  of  Cornarius,  Basel, 
1542,  etc.,  which  I  have  read  in 
Stephanus,  Medicae  artis  prin- 
cipes,  1567. 

Recent  editions  of  portions  of 
Aetius  are  :  kinov  'Koyos  SuSeKaros 
TtpoiTOv  vvv  eKSoOeis  viro  Teupyiov  A. 
KuxTTonoipov,  pp.  112,  131,  Paris, 
1802. 


Die  Augenheilkunde  des  Aetius 
aus  Amida,  Griechisch  und 
deutsch  herausg.  von  J.  Hirsch- 
berg,  pp.  xi,  204,  Leipzig,  1899. 

Aetii  sermo  sextidecimus  et 
ultimiiS  (Aeriov  irtpi  tuv  ev  fJ.iiTp(f. 
iradoiv  etc.).  Erstens  aus  HSS 
veroffentl.  mit  Abbildungen,  etc., 
V.  S.  Zervos,  pp.  k',  172,  Leipzig, 
1901. 

KiTLov  AfjtiSivov  Aoyos  SeKaros  irenw- 
Tos,  ed.  S.  Zerbos,  1909,  in  EiriaTt]- 
fiOVLKT)    Eraipeto,  KO-qva,  Vol.  21. 

My  references  to  Alexander  of 
Tralles  are  both  to  the  text  of 
Stephanus    (1567)    and   the   more 


■^66 


CHAP.  XXV 


POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE 


567 


but  although  Marcellus  antedates  the  other  two  by  a  full 
century,  we  shall  consider  him  last,  since  he  wrote  in  Latin 
while  they  wrote  in  Greek,  and  since  he  includes  Celtic  words 
and  probably  Celtic  folk-lore,  and  since  he  seems  to  have 


recent  edition  by  Theodor  Pusch- 
mann,  Alexander  von  Tralles, 
Originaltext  und  Uberseizung 
nebst  einer  einleitenden  Abhand- 
liing,  Vienna,  1878-9,  2  vols.  This 
gives  a  more  critical  text  than  any 
previous  edition,  but  unfortu- 
nately Puschmann  adopted  still 
another  arrangement  into  books 
than  those  of  the  MSS  and  previ- 
ous editions,  and  also  in  my 
opinion  did  not  make  a  sufficient 
study  of  the  Latin  MSS.  His  in- 
troduction contains  information 
concerning  Alexander's  life  and 
the  MSS  and  previous  editions  of 
his  works. 

A  valuable  earlier  study  on 
Alexander  was  that  of  E.  Mil- 
ward,  published  in  1733  under  the 
title,  A  Letter  to  the  Honourable 
Sir  Hans  Sloane  Bart.,  etc.,  and 
in  1734  as  Trallianus  Reviyi- 
sccns,  229  pp.  Milward  was  pre- 
paring an  edition  of  Alexander 
of  Tralles,  but  it  was  never  pub- 
lished. His  estimate  of  Alex- 
ander's position  in  the  history  of 
medicine  furnishes  an  incidental 
picture  of  interest  of  the  state  of 
medicine  in  his  own  time,  the 
early  eighteenth  century. 

The  old  Latin  translation  of 
Alexander  of  Tralles  was  the 
first  to  be  printed  at  Lyons,  1504, 
Alexandri  yatros  practica  cunt 
expositione  glose  interlinearis 
Jacobi  de  Partibus  et  {Simonis) 
Januensis  in  margine  posite;  also 
Pavia,  1520  and  Venice  1522. 
Next  appeared  a  very  free  Latin 
translation  by  Torinus  in  1533  and 
1541,  Paraphrases  in  libros  omnes 
Alexandri  Tralliani.  The  Greek 
text  of  Alexander  was  first 
printed  by  Stephanus  (Robert 
fitienne)  in  1548  (ed.  J.  Goupyl). 
The  Latin  translation  by  Guinther 
of  Andernach,  which  is  included 
in  Stephanus  (1567),  first  ap- 
peared in  1549,  Strasburg,  and 
was  reprinted  a  number  of  times. 


Another  work  by  Puschmann 
may  also  be  noted :  Nachtrdge  zu, 
Alexander  Trallianus.  Frag- 
mente  aus  Philuinenus  und  Phi- 
lagrius  nebst  eincr  bisher  noch 
ungedruckten  Abhaiidlung  iiber 
Augenkrankheitcn,  Berlin,  1886, 
in  Berliner  Studien  f.  class.  Philol. 
und  Archaeol.,  V,  2;  188  pp.,  in 
which  he  segregates  as  fragments 
of  Philumenus  and  Philagrius 
portions  of  the  text  of  Alexander 
as  found  in  the  Latin  MSS. 

My  references  for  the  De 
medicamentis  of  Marcellus  apply 
to  Helmreich's  edition  of  1889  in 
the  Teubner  series.  This  edition 
is  based  on  a  single  MS  of  the 
ninth  century  at  Laon  which 
Helmreich  followed  Valentin 
Rose  in  regarding  as  the  sole  ex- 
tant codex  of  the  work.  As  a 
result  Rose  indulged  in  ingenious 
theories  to  explain  how  the  editio 
princeps  by  lanus  Cornarius, 
Basel,  1536,  included  the  prefa- 
tory letter  and  other  preliminary 
material  not  found  in  the  Laon 
MS,  whose  first  leaves  and  some 
others  are  missing. 

But  as  a  matter  of  fact  BN 
6880,  a  clear  and  beautifully  writ- 
ten MS  of  the  ninth  century,  con- 
tains the  De  medicamentis  entire 
with  all  the  preliminary  letters. 
Moreover,  it  is  evident  that  the 
editio  princeps  was  printed  di- 
rectly from  this  MS,  which  con- 
tains not  only  notes  by  Cornarius 
but  the  marks  of  the  compositors. 

The  text  of  the  edition  of  1536 
was  reproduced  in  the  medical 
collections  of  Aldus,  Medici 
antiqui,  Venice,  1547,  and  Steph- 
anus, Medicae  artis  principes, 
^567. 

Jacob  Grimm,  Uber  Marcellus 
Burdigalensis,  in  Abhandl.  d.  kgl, 
Akad.  d.  Wiss.  2.  Berlin  (1847), 
pp.  429-60,  discusses  the  evidence 
for  placing  Marcellus  under  the 
older  Theodosius,  lists  the  Celtic 


568 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Medical 
compen- 
diums: 
Oribasius 
and  Paul 
of  Aegina. 


been  a  native  of  Gaul,  if  not  of  Bordeaux,^  and  thus  is  geo- 
graphically closer  to  the  scene  of  medieval  Latin  learning. 
Aetius  and  Alexander  have  the  closer  connection  not  only 
with  the  eastern  and  Greek  v^orld  but  also  with  the  past 
classical  medicine  of  Galen  and  so  will  provide  a  better 
point  of  departure.  Presumably  from  the  places  and  periods 
in  which  they  lived,  all  three  of  our  authors  were  Christians, 
but  it  must  be  said  that  the  chief  evidence  of  Christianity 
in  their  works  is  the  use  of  Christian  or  Hebrew  proper 
names  in  incantations,  and  there  are  some  analogous  relics 
of  pagan  superstition. 

As  Tribonian  and  Justinian  boiled  down  the  voluminous 
legal  literature  of  Rome  into  one  Digest,  so  there  was  a 
similar  tendency  to  reduce  the  past  medical  writings  of  the 
Greeks  into  one  compendious  work.  Paul  of  Aegina,  writ- 
ing in  the  seventh  century,  observes  in  his  preface  ^  that 
it  is  not  right,  when  lawyers  who  usually  have  plenty  of  time 
to  reflect  over  their  cases  have  handy  summaries  of  their 
subject  to  which  they  can  refer,  that  physicians  whose  cases 
often  require  immediate  action  should  not  also  have  some 


words  and  expressions  found  in 
the  De  medicamentis,  and  also 
one  hundred  specimens  of  its 
folk-lore  and  magic.  This  article 
was  reprinted  in  Kleinere  Schrif- 
ten,  II  (1865),  114-51,  where  it  is 
followed  at  pp.  152-72  by  a  sup- 
plementary paper,  Ubcr  die  Mar- 
cellischen  Formeln,  likewise  re- 
printed from  the  Academy 
Proceedings  for  1855,  pp.  51-68. 

The  magic  of  Marcellus  was 
further  treated  of  by  R.  Heim, 
De  rebus  magicis  Marcelli  medici, 
in  Schedae  philol.  Hermanno 
Usener  oblatae  (1891),  pp.  119-37, 
v/here  he  adds  nova  magica  ex 
Marcelli  libris  collata  which 
Grimm  had  omitted. 

^  Marcellus  is  often  called  of 
Bordeaux,  notably  in  Grimm's 
article,  Vber  Marcellus  Burdiga- 
lensis,  1847 ;  also  by  C.  W.  King, 
The  Gnostics  and  their  Remains, 
1887,  p.  219;  and  by  J.  G.  Frazer, 
The    Golden    Bough,    I,    23 ;    but 


there  seems  to  be  no  definite 
proof  that  he  was  from  that  city. 

Jules  Combarieu,  La  musique  et 
la  magie,  1909,  p.  87,  says  in  ref- 
erence to  the  following  incanta- 
tion recommended  by  Marcellus, 
tetunc  resonco  bregan  gresso, 
"Je  remarque  en  passant  qu'il  faut 
frotter  I'oeil  en  disant  ce  carmen, 
et  que  dans  le  patois  du  Midi, 
bregua  ou  brege,  signifie  frotter. 
Marcellus,  si  je  ne  me  trompe, 
etait  de  Bordeaux." 

Grimm,  however  (1847),  p.  455, 
interpreted  bregan  as  "lies" — 
"breigan  gen.  pi.  von  breag  liige," 
and  the  whole  line  as  in  modern 
Irish  teith  uainn  ere  soin  go 
breigan  grcasa  ("fleuch  von  uns 
staub  hinnen  zu  der  liigen  genos- 
sen !"). 

^Stephanus  (1567),!,  347,  .  ^^ 
seq.  For  an  English  translation 
of  the  text  see  F.  Adams,  The 
Seven  Books  of  Paulus  Aegineta, 
London,  1844-1847. 


XXV  POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE  569 

convenient  handbook,  and  the  more  so  since  many  of  them 
are  called  upon  to  exercise  their  profession  not  in  large  cities 
with  easy  access  to  libraries,  but  in  the  country,  in  desert 
places,  or  on  shipboard.  Oribasius,  friend  and  physician 
of  the  emperor  Julian,  361-363  A.  D.,  had  made  such  a  com- 
pendium by  that  emperor's  order.  In  this  he  embodied  so 
much  of  Galen's  teachings  that  he  became  known  as  "the  ape 
of  Galen,"  ^  although  he  also  used  more  recent  writers. 
But  Paul  of  Aegina  regarded  this  work  of  Oribasius  as  too 
bulky,  since  it  originally  comprised  seventy-two  books  al- 
though only  twenty-five  are  now  extant,  and  so  essayed  a 
briefer  compilation  of  his  own.  Two  centuries  ago,  how- 
ever, Friend  and  Milward  protested  against  regarding  Paul, 
Aetius,  and  Alexander  as  mere  compilers  and  maintained 
that  they  "were  really  men  of  great  learning  and  experi- 
ence" ^  who  "have  described  distempers  which  were  omitted 
before;  taught  a  new  method  of  treating  old  ones;  given  an 
account  of  new  medicines,  both  simple  and  compound ;  and 
made  large  additions  to  the  practice  of  surgery."  ^  Pusch- 
mann  more  recently  states  that  Paul's  compendium  was 
"composed  with  great  originality  and  independence"  and 
is  of  great  value  "particularly  in  its  surgical  sections."  * 
After  Paul,  however,  the  Byzantine  medical  writers,  such 
as  Palladius,  Theophilus,  Stephen  of  Alexandria,  Nonus, 
and  Psellus,  were  of  an  inferior  caliber.^  With  Paul's 
work,  however,  we  are  not  now  further  concerned,  nor  with 
that  of  Oribasius,  but  with  the  somewhat  similar  com- 
pendiums  of  Aetius  and  Alexander  which  lie  chronologically 
between  these  other  two.  It  is  Aetius  and  Alexander  whom 
Payne  accuses  of  "introducing  into  classical  medicine  the 
magical  elements  derived  from  the  East"  ^  and  whom  we 

^Simia     Galieni,    according    to  *Puschmann,  History  of  Medi- 

Guinther     in     his     translation    of  cal  Education,  1891,  p.  153. 

Alexander   of    Tralles,    Stephanus  ^Milward  (i733),  P-  H- 

(1567),  I,  131.  °J.  F.  Payne,  English  Medicine 

*  Milward   (1733),  9-11.  in  Anglo-Saxon   Times,  1904.  PP- 

*John  Friend  (or  Freind),  His-  102-8. 
iory  of  Physick   (1725),  I,  297. 


Amida. 


570  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

might  therefore  expect  to  possess  an  especial  interest  for 
our  investigation. 
Aetius  of  Of  the  life  and  personality  of  Aetius  we  know  very  little, 

but  inasmuch  as  he  mentions  St.  Cyril,  archbishop  of  Alex- 
andria, and  Peter  the  Archiater,  a  physician  of  Theodoric, 
while  he  himself  is  cited  by  Alexander  of  Tralles,  he  seems 
to  have  lived  at  the  end  of  the  fifth  and  beginning  of  the 
sixth  century.^  And  since  Alexander  cites  him  only  in  his 
book  on  fevers  which  seems  to  have  been  composed  after 
the  rest  of  his  work,  it  seems  probable  that  Aetius  was  al- 
most contemporary  with  him  and  wrote  in  the  sixth  rather 
than  the  fifth  century.  His  Tetrabihlos — each  of  the  four 
books  subdivides  into  four  sections  and  often  these  are 
spoken  of  as  sixteen  books — occupies  a  middle  position  not 
only  in  time  but  in  length  between  the  works  of  Oribasius 
and  Paul,  and  resembles  the  latter  in  making  a  great  deal 
of  use  of  the  former.  Aetius'  extracts  from  the  older 
writers  are  shorter  than  those  of  Oribasius,  however,  and 
he  also  differs  from  him  in  combining  several  authorities  in 
a  single  chapter,  the  method  usually  adopted  by  the  medieval 
Latin  encyclopedists.  It  has  been  noted  that  the  wording 
of  the  original  authorities  was  often  preserved  in  the  oldest 
medieval  manuscripts  of  Aetius,  until  the  copyists  of  the 
time  of  the  Italian  Renaissance  began  to  touch  up  the  style 
in  accordance  with  their  erroneous  notions  of  what  consti- 
tuted classical  Greek. ^  It  may  also  be  said  that  these  sys- 
tematically arranged  handbooks  of  Oribasius,  Aetius,  and 
the  rest,  where  one  could  find  what  one  was  looking  after, 
were  far  superior  in  systematic  and  orderly  presentation 
to  the  discursive  works  of  Galen  which,  like  many  other 
classical  writings,  often  seem  rambling  and  without  any 
particular  plan.^     This  more  logical,  if  somewhat  cut-and- 

*  Milward  (1733),  p.  19;  Pusch-  to     find     confirmed    by     Milward 

mann  (1878),  I,  104.  {'i^72>Z),    p.    29,    in    the    particular 

^  Ch.    Daremberg,    Histoire    des  case  of  Alexander  of  Tralles,  of 

Sciences  Medicates,  Paris,  1870,  I,  whom      he      writes :      "As      our 

242.  author's  stile  is  excellent,  so  like- 

'  This     general     impression     re-  wise  is  his  method,  and  there  is 

ceived  from  reading  many  classi-  no    respect   in   which   he   is   more 

cal  and  medieval  works  I  was  glad  distinguished      from     the      other 


XXV 


POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE 


571 


dried  method,  was  also  to  be  a  virtue  of  medieval  Latin 
learning.  Whether  Aetius  directly  influenced  the  Latin  mid- 
dle ages  is  doubtful,  since  no  early  Latin  translation  of  him 
seems  to  be  known. ^  The  work  of  Oribasius,  however, 
exists  in  Latin  translation  in  manuscripts  of  the  seventh  cen- 
tury as  well  as  in  others  of  the  ninth  and  twelfth.^ 

The  works  of  Aetius  and  Alexander  of  Tralles  do  not 
impress  me  as  containing  an  unusually  large  amount  of 
superstitious  medicine.  Much  less  am  I  inclined  to  agree 
with  Payne  that  they  are  responsible  for  the  introduction 
into  classical  medicine  of  magical  elements  derived  from 
the  east.  These  elements,  whether  derived  from  the  orient 
any  more  than  any  other  feature  of  classical  civilization  or 
not,  at  any  rate  had  been  a  prominent  feature  of  classical 
medicine  long  before  the  days  of  Aetius  and  Alexander,  as 
Pliny's  review  of  medicine  before  his  time  abundantly 
proved  and  as  is  also  shown  by  the  extraordinary  virtues 
which  Pliny  himself,  his  contemporary  Dioscorides,  and 
even  the  great  Galen  attributed  to  medicinal  simples. 

It  is  true  that  Aetius  and  Alexander  abound  in  recipes 
for  elaborate  medical  compounds  composed  of  numerous  in- 
gredients. Of  such  concoctions  one  example  must  suffice,  a 
plaster  which  Aetius  recommends  for  tumors,  hard  lumps, 
and  gout.  "Of  the  terebinth-tree,  of  the  stone  of  Asia,  of 
bitumen  three  hundred  and  sixty  drams  each;  of  washing- 
soda  {spumae  nitri),  calf-fat,  wax,  laurel  berries,  ammonia, 
and  thyme  three  hundred  and  forty  drams  each;  of  the 
stone  pyrites  and  quick-lime  one  hundred  and  twenty  drams 
each;  of  the  ashes  of  asps  which  have  been  burned  alive  one 


Greek  writers  in  physick  than  in 
this.  The  works  of  Hippocrates, 
Galen,  and  indeed  of  all  of  them 
except  it  be  Aretaeus  are  not 
only  very  voluminous  but  put  to- 
gether with  little  or  no  order,  as 
is  evident  enough  to  all  such  as 
have  been  conversant  with  them." 
'Daremberg  (1870),  I,  258-9, 
said  that  a  mass  of  MSS  in  a 
score  of  European  libraries  con- 
tained   as    vet    unidentified    Latin 


translations     of     Greek     medical 
writers. 

^BN  10233,  7th  century  uncial; 
BN  nouv.  acq.  1619,  7-8th  cen- 
tury, demi-uncial ;  BN  9332,  9th 
century,  fol.  i-,  Oribasii  synopsis 
medica;  CLM  23535,  12th  cen- 
tury, fols.  72  and  112.  V.  Rose, 
Soranus,  1882,  pp.  iv-v,  speaks  of 
a  sixth  century  Latin  version  of 
Oribasius. 


How 

super- 
stitious 
are  Aetius 
and  Alex- 
ander? 


Compound 
medicines. 


572 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Aetius 
merely  re- 
produces 
the  super- 
stition of 
Galen. 


hundred  and  forty  drams;  of  old  oil  two  pounds.  First 
liquefy  the  oil  and  wax,  then  the  bitumen,  which  should 
have  first  been  pulverized.  Add  to  these  the  fat,  and  pres- 
ently the  ammonia  and  terebinth;  and  when  these  are  taken 
off  the  fire  mix  in  the  lime  and  stone  of  Asia,  then  the 
laurel  berries  and  washing-soda,  and  finally  after  the  medica- 
ment has  cooled  sprinkle  the  ashes  of  asps  upon  it."  ^  Such 
concoctions  are  to  a  large  extent  borrowed  by  Aetius,  Alex- 
ander, and  Marcellus  from  earlier  writers.  Moreover,  while 
Pliny  had  excluded  such  compounds  from  the  pages  of  his 
Natural  History,  he  had  also  made  it  abundantly  evident 
that  they  were  already  in  general  use  by  his  time,  and  they 
are  to  be  found  in  great  numbers  in  the  works  of  Galen 
who  cites  many  from  preceding  writers. 

Indeed,  it  was  from  Galen  himself  and  not  from  the  east 
that  Aetius  at  least  derived  his  most  strikingly  superstitious 
passages.  This  was  accidentally  and  convincingly  proven 
by  my  own  experience.  It  so  happened  that  I  wrote  an  ac- 
count of  the  passages  in  the  Tetrahihlos  of  Aetius  before 
I  had  read  extensively  in  Galen's  works.  When  I  came 
to  do  so,  I  found  that  almost  every  passage  that  I  had 
selected  to  illustrate  the  superstitious  side  of  Aetius  was 
contained  in  Galen :  for  example,  the  use  as  an  amulet  of  a 
green  jasper  suspended  from  the  neck  by  a  thread  so  as  to 
touch  the  abdomen;^  the  story  of  the  reapers  who  found 
the  dead  viper  in  their  wine  and  cured  instead  of  killing 
the  sufferer  from  elephantiasis  to  whom  they  gave  the  wine 
to  drink;  ^  the  tale  of  his  preceptor  who  roasted  river  crabs 
to  an  ash  in  a  red  copper  dish  in  August  during  dog-days  on 
the  eighteenth  day  of  the  moon,  and  administered  the  powder 
daily  for  forty  days  to  persons  bitten  by  mad  dogs.'*     Such 


*  Tetrabiblos,  IV,  iii,  15. 

^  Ibid.,  I,  iv,  9,  where  Galen  is 
not  cited,  and  III,  i,  9,  where 
Galen  is  cited.  In  Galen,  De  sini- 
plicibus,  IX,  ii,  19  (Kiihn,  XII, 
207). 

^Ibid.,  I,  ii,  170,  where  Galen  is 
not  cited ;   De  simplicibus ,  XI,  i, 


I  (Kiihn,  XII,  31 1-4). 

*  Tetrabiblos  I,  ii,  175;  Kiihn 
XII,  356-9.  Galen  is  not  cited  in 
this,  nor  in  any  of  the  following 
passages  from  the  Tetrabiblos 
listed  in  the  notes,  unless  this  is 
expressly  stated. 


XXV  POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE  573 

passages  are  usually  repeated  by  Aetius  in  such  a  way  as  to 
lead  the  reader  to  think  them  his  own  experiences,  a  fact 
which  warns  us  not  to  accept  the  assertions  of  ancient  and 
medieval  authors  that  they  have  experienced  this  or  that 
at  their  face  value,  and  which  makes  us  wonder  if  Friend 
and  Milward  were  not  too  generous  in  regarding  Aetius 
at  least  as  more  than  a  compiler.  He  also  repeats  some  of 
Galen's  general  observations  anent  experience  as  that  the 
virtues  of  simples  are  best  discovered  thus,  and  that  he 
will  not  discuss  all  plants  but  only  those  **of  which  we  have 
information  by  experience."  ^  He  further  reproduces 
Galen's  attitude  of  mingled  credulity  and  scepticism  con- 
cerning the  basilisk,  combining  the  two  passages  into  one ;  ^ 
also  Galen's  questioning  the  efficacy  of  incantations  and  tell- 
ing of  having  seen  a  scorpion  killed  by  the  mere  spittle  of  a 
fasting  man  without  any  incantation,^  Like  Galen  again, 
he  omits  all  injurious  medicaments  and  expresses  the  opinion 
that  men  who  spread  the  knowledge  of  such  drugs  do  more 
harm  than  actual  poisoners  who  perhaps  cause  but  a  single 
death.*  Like  Galen  he  announces  his  intention  to  omit  all 
"abominable  and  detestable  recipes  and  those  which  are  pro- 
hibited by  law,"  mentioning  as  instances  the  eating  of  human 
flesh  and  drinking  urine  or  menses  muliehres.^  But  also 
like  Galen,  he  devotes  several  chapters  to  the  virtues  of 
human  and  animal  excrement,  especially  recommending  that 
of  dogs  after  they  have  been  fed  on  bones  for  two  days.^ 
Somewhat  similar  to  Galen's  recommendation  to  fill  cavities 
in  the  teeth  with  roasted  earthworms  is  the  recipe  of  Aetius 
for  painless  extraction  of  teeth  "without  iron."  The  tooth 
must  first  be  thoroughly  scraped  or  the  gum  cut  loose  about 
it,  and  then  sprinkled  with  the  ashes  of  earthworms.  "There- 
fore use  this  remedy  with  confidence,  for  it  has  already  often 

*  Tetrabihlos    at    the    beginning, 
pp.  6-7  in  Stephanus   (1567). 

*  Tetrabiblos    IV,    i,    33 ;    Kiihn 
XIV,  233,  and  XII,  250-1. 

^Tetrabiblos    I,    ii,    109;    Kiihn 
XII,  288. 


*  Tetrabiblos 

I,    ii,    84; 

Kiihn 

XII,  253. 

°  Tetrabiblos 

I,    ii,    84; 

Kiihn 

XII,  248,  284-S. 

*  Tetrabiblos 

I,   ii,    III; 

Kiihn 

XII,  291-3. 

574 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Occult 
science 
mixed 
with  some 
scepticism. 


been  celebrated  as  a  mystery."  ^     Such  use  of  earthworms 
continued  a  feature  of  medieval  dentistry. 

Of  my  original  selections  from  Aetius  very  few  are  now 
left,  and  it  is  not  unlikely  that  they  too  might  be  found 
somewhere  in  Galen's  works  if  one  looked  long  enough. 
Aetius  asserts  that  drinking  bitumen  or  asphalt  in  water 
will  prevent  hydrophobia  from  developing,^  and  recommends 
for  wounds  inflicted  by  sea  serpents  an  application  of  lead 
with  a  slice  of  the  serpent  itself.^  He  takes  the  following 
prescription  from  Oribasius.  To  cure  impotency  anoint 
the  big  toe  of  the  right  foot  with  oil  in  which  the  pulverized 
ashes  of  a  lizard  have  been  mixed.  To  check  the  operation 
of  this  powerful  stimulant  one  has  merely  to  wash  off  the 
ointment  from  the  toe.*  On  the  other  hand,  an  instance 
of  a  sceptical  tendency  is  the  citation  of  the  view  of  Posi- 
donius  that  the  so-called  incubus  is  not  a  demon  but  a  dis- 
ease akin  to  epilepsy  and  insanity  and  marked  by  suffoca- 
tion, loss  of  voice,  heaviness,  and  immobility.^  It  may  also 
be  noted  that  in  discussing  the  medicinal  virtues  of  the 
beaver's  testicles  Aetius  does  not  include  the  story  of  its 
biting  them  off  in  order  to  escape  its  hunters.®  He  does, 
however,  cite  several  authorities,  Piso,  Menelbus,  Simonides, 
Aristodemus,  and  Pherecydes  for  instances  of  the  remark- 
able powers  of  certain  animals  in  discovering  the  presence 
of  poisons  and  preserving  themselves  and  their  owners  from 
this  danger:  a  partridge  who  made  a  great  noise  and  fuss 
whenever  any  medicament  or  poison  was  being  prepared 
in  the  house;  a  pet  eagle  who  would  attack  anyone  in  the 
house  who  even  plotted  such  a  thing ;  a  peacock  who  would 
go  to  the  place  where  the  dose  had  been  prepared  and  raise 

oil    in    which    earthworms    have 


^  Tetrabiblos  II,  iv,  34;  Kiihn 
Xll,  860.  Perhaps  a  closer  cor- 
respondence than  this  could  be 
found.  In  his  preceding  33rd 
chapter,  headed  Curatio  erosorum 
dentium  ex  Galeno,  Aetius  in- 
cludes use  of  the  tooth  of  a  dead 
dog  pulverized  in  vinegar,  which 
is  to  be  held  in  the  mouth,  or 
filling  the  ear  next  the  tooth  with 
"fumigated   earthworms"   or  with 


m 
been  cooked. 

*  Tetrabiblos  I,  ii,  49. 
'  Tetrabiblos  IV,  i,  39. 

*  Tetrabiblos  III,  iii,  35- 

"  Tetrabiblos  II,  ii,  12.  Mar- 
cellus,  cap.  20  (p.  188)  also  speaks 
of  "those  who  often  think  that 
they  are  made  sport  of  by  an  in- 
cubus." 

'  Tetrabiblos,  I,  ii,  177. 


XXV 


POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE 


575 


a  clamor,  or  upset  the  receptacle  containing  the  potion,  or 
dig  up  a  charm,  if  it  had  been  buried  underground;  and  a 
pet  ichneumon  and  parrot  who  were  endowed  with  very- 
similar  gifts, ^  Aetius  shows  a  slight  tendency  in  the  direc- 
tion of  astrological  medicine,  giving  a  list  of  "times  or- 
dained by  God"  for  the  risings  and  settings  of  various  stars, 
since  these  affect  the  air  and  winds,  and  since  "the  bodies 
of  persons  in  good  health,  and  much  more  so  those  of  the 
sick,  are  altered  according  to  the  state  of  the  air."  ^  But  on 
the  whole,  of  our  three  authors,  Aetius  seems  to  contain  the 
smallest  proportional  amount  of  superstitious  medicine  and 
occult  science. 

Alexander  of  Tralles  was  the  son  of  a  physician  and,  Alex- 
according  to  the  Byzantine  historian,  Agathias,^  the  young-  Tralles. 
est  of  a  group  of  five  distinguished  brothers,  including 
Anthemius  of  Tralles,  architect  of  St.  Sophia  at  Constanti- 
nople, and  Metrodorus  the  grammarian,  whom  Justinian 
summoned  also  to  his  court.  Alexander  had  visited  Italy, 
Gaul,  and  Spain  as  well  as  all  parts  of  Greece  *  before  set- 
tling down  in  old  age,  when  he  could  no  longer  engage  in 
active  medical  practice,^  to  the  composition  of  his  magnum 
opus  in  twelve  books  beginning  with  the  head,  eyes,  and  ears, 
and  ending  with  gout  and  fever.  Aside  from  his  citation  of 
Aetius  in  the  book  on  fevers,  the  latest  writer  named  by 
Alexander  is  Jacobus  Psychrestus,  physician  to  Leo  the 
Great  about  474.^  It  seems  rather  strange  that  Alexander 
says  nothing  of  the  pestilence  of  542.'^ 

Alexander  embodied  the  results  of  his  own  practice  to  a   Origin- 
much  greater  extent  than  Oribasius  and  Aetius.     His  book   his^work. 
is  more  a  record  of  his  own  medical  observations  and  experi- 
ences than  a  compilation  from  past  writings,  a  fact  recog- 


'  Tetrabiblos,  IV,  i,  86. 

'  Tetrabiblos  I,  iii,  164.  This 
passage  was  printed  separately  in 
the  Uranologion  of  D.  Petavius, 
Paris,  1630  and  1703. 

^  Agathias,  De  imperio  et  rebus 
gestis  Justiniani,  Paris,  i860,  p. 
149. 

*Milward     (1733),    p.     I7,    "he 


travel'd  through  Greece,  Gaul, 
Spain,  and  several  other  places 
whose  mention  we  find  up  and 
down  in  his  works." 

^  Puschmann  ( 1878) ,  1, 288,  Si6  Kai 
ykpoiv  XoiTTov  -Trei^apxw  Kal  K&nvtLV 
ovKtTi  Swafxevos  .   .   . 

"Milward  (i733),P-25. 

'Puschmann  (1878),  1,83. 


576  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       cHAr. 

nized  in  the  first  edition  which  entitled  it  Practica,  and 
"though  he  pays  a  due  deference  to  the  ancients,  yet  he  is 
so  far  from  putting  an  impHcit  faith  in  what  they  have 
advanced  that  he  very  often  dissents  from  their  doctrines."  ^ 
Puschmann  regarded  him  as  the  first  doctor  for  a  long  time 
who  had  done  any  original  thinking,^  and  esteemed  his 
pathology  as  highly  as  his  therapeutics  had  been  esteemed 
by  his  sixteenth  century  translator,  Guinther  of  Ander- 
nach.^  Friend  wrote  of  him  in  the  early  eighteenth  cen- 
tury, "His  method  is  extremely  rational  and  just  and  after 
all  our  discoveries  and  improvements  in  physick  scarce  any- 
thing can  be  added  to  it."  *  Alexander  seems  to  have  been 
a  practitioner  of  much  resource  and  ingenuity,  stopping 
hemorrhage  of  the  nose  by  blowing  down  or  fuzz  up  the 
nostrils  through  a  hollow  reed,  and  directing  patients,  a 
thousand  years  before  the  discovery  of  the  Eustachian  tube, 
to  sneeze  with  mouth  and  nose  stopped  up  in  order  to  dis- 
lodge a  foreign  object  from  the  ear.^  According  to  Mil- 
ward,  Alexander  was  the  first  Greek  medical  writer  to  men- 
tion rhubarb  and  tape-worms,  and  the  first  practitioner  to 
open  the  jugular  veins. ^  Indeed,  Alexander  advises  blood- 
letting a  great  deal,  but  Milward,  whose  age  still  approved 
of  that  practice,  notes  that  he  was  "no  ways  addicted  to 
those  superstitious  rules  of  opening  this  or  that  vein  in 
particular  cases  which  several  of  the  ancients  and  some 
even  among  the  moderns  have  been  so  very  fond  of."  "^ 
Finally,  Alexander's  concise  and  orderly  method  of  presenta- 
tion compares  favorably  with  that  of  the  classical  medical 
writers. 
His  Alexander's  book  traveled  west,  as  its  author  had  done, 

influence.     ^"<^  ^^s  current  in  a  free  and  abbreviated  Latin  translation 
from  an  early  date.^    In  fact,  it  was  from  the  Latin  version 

*  Milward  (1733),  p.  27.  ''Ibid.,  pp.  48-9. 
''Puschmann   (1891),  152-3,  *  See    V.    Rose,    Hermes,   VIII, 
'Stephanus  (1567),  I,  131.  39;  Anecdota,  II,  108.     I  presume 

*  Friend   (1725),  I,  106.  that    BN    9332,    9th    century,    fol. 
"Milward    (1733),   pp.  65-6,  57        139,        "Alexandri        hiatrosofiste 

et  seq.  therapeut(i)con"     (libri    tres)     is 

^  Ibid.,  pp.  104,  92-3,  71.  the    free    Latin    translation    in    a 


POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE 


S77 


that  the  work  was  translated  into  Hebrew  and  Syriac.^ 
Not  only  are  Latin  manuscripts  of  Alexander's  work 
as  a  whole  or  of  extracts  from  it  -  found  from  the  ninth 
century  on,  while  printed  editions  in  Latin  were  numerous 
through  the  sixteenth  century,  but  it  was  much  used  and 
cited  by  medieval  writers  such  as  Constantinus  Africanus, 
Gariopontus,^  and  Gilbert  of  England.'*  It  is  not,  how- 
ever, always  safe  to  assume  that  citations  of  Alexander 

Paris  MS  of  the  ninth  century 
alluded  to  by  Daremberg  (1870), 
I,  258-9.  Puschmann  (1878)  I, 
91-2,  in  a  blind  and  inadequate 
account  of  the  Latin  MSS,  does 
not  mention  it,  but  lists  a  Monte 
Cassino  codex  (97)  of  the  9-ioth 
century  and  an  Angers  MS  of  the 
lo-iith  century.  He  also  alludes 
to  a  MS  at  Chartres  without  giv- 
ing any  number  or  date  for  it, 
but  probably  has  reference  to 
Chartres  342,  12th  century,  fols. 
1-139,  "Libri  tres  Alexandri 
Yatros."  He  alludes  to  BN  6881 
and  6882,  both  13th  century,  libri 
tres  de  morbis  et  de  morborum 
curatione ;  but  not  to  CLM  344, 
I2-I3th  century,  fols.  1-60,  libri 
ni  de  medicina, — integra  versio 
Latina  Lugduni  a.  1504  edita. 
Other  MSS  are:  Gonville  and 
Caius  400,  early  13th  century,  fols. 
4V-83V,  "Inc.  Alexander  yatros 
sophista";  Royal  12-B-XVI,  late 
13th  century,  fol.  113,  Practica 
Alexandri. 

It  will  be  noted  that  the  text  in 
all  these  Latin  MSS  is  in  only 
three  books,  but  it  follows  the 
same  order  as  the  twelve  books. 
It  is  also,  at  least  in  the  edition 
of  1504,  not  as  abbreviated  as  one 
might  infer  from  Rose.  Rather 
the  later  editors,  Albanus  Tori- 
nus  and  Guinther  of  Andernach, 
seem  to  have  taken  greater  liber- 
ties with,  and  made  unwarranted 
additions  to  Alexander's  text.  At 
the  same  time  the  early  Latin 
text  treats  of  some  topics  such  as 
toothache  which  are  not  included 
in  Puschmann's  Greek  text,  and 
also  includes  (II,  79-103,  and  104- 
50)  treatments  of  diseases  of  the 
abdomen    and    spleen    for    which 


there  seems  to  be  no  genuine 
Greek  text  and  which  Pusch- 
mann, Nachtr'dge,  1886,  has  pub- 
lished separately  as  fragments  of 
Philumenus  and  Philagrius,  medi- 
cal writers  of  the  first  and  fourth 
centuries.  His  chief  reason  seems 
to  be  that  cap.  79  is  entitled,  De 
reumate  ventris  iilominis,  and  cap. 
104,  Ad  splencni  philogrius,  while 
cap.  151  is  headed,  Causa  que  est 
ydropicie  alexandri.  These  pas- 
sages are,  however,  found  in  the 
Latin  MSS  of  Alexander's  work 
from  the  first,  and  the  use  of 
Romance  words  by  the  unknown 
Latin  translator  indicates  that  the 
translation  was  made  in  the  early 
medieval  period,  —  Puschmann 
(1886),  p.  12. 

*  Puschmann    (1878),  I,  91. 

^As  in  Vendome  109,  nth  cen- 
tury, fol.  I,  Mulsa  Alexandri 
(Tralliani),  fol.  68v,  "De  reuma 
ventris,  de  libro  Alexandri"  (not 
here  ascribed,  it  will  be  noted,  to 
Philumenus),  fol.  71,  "De  secundo 
libro  Alexandri  de  cura  nefreti- 
corum."  The  Mulsa  Alexandri  is 
found  also  in  two  other  nth  cen- 
tury MSS  of  the  same  library: 
Vendome  172,  fol.  i,  and  175,  fol.  2. 

In  Royal  12-E-XX,  12th  cen- 
tury, fols.  146V-151V,  "Incipit 
liber  dietarum  diversarum  medi- 
corum,  hoc  est  Alexandri  et 
aliorum."  This  extract,  made  up 
of  a  number  of  Alexander's  chap- 
ters on  the  diet  suitable  in  differ- 
ent ailments,  is  often  found  in 
the  MSS,  as  here,  with  the 
Pseudo-Pliny  and  was  printed  as 
its  fifth  book  in  1509  and  1516. 

*  Puschmann    (1878),  I,  97. 
*Milward    (1773),  P-  I79- 


sonal   ex- 
perience 


578  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

medicus,  encountered  in  thirteenth  century  writers  on  the 
nature  of  things  like  Thomas  of  Cantimpre  and  Bartholo- 
mew of  England,  have  reference  to  Alexander  of  Tralles, 
since  a  treatise  on  fevers  is  also  ascribed  to  Alexander  of 
Aphrodisias/  while  a  work  on  the  pulse  and  urine  in 
fevers  is  thought  to  be  by  some  medieval  Alexander.^  And 
medical  treatises  are  sometimes  ascribed  even  to  Alexander 
the  Great  of  Macedon  in  the  medieval  manuscripts.^ 
His  per-  We  have  already  said  that  Alexander  is  no  mere  com- 

piler but  embodies  the  results  of  his  own  observation  and 
experience  during  a  long  period  of  travel  and  medical 
practice.  He  frequently  asserts  that  he  has  tested  this  or 
that  for  himself,  or  that  the  prescription  in  question  has 
been  "approved  by  long  use  and  experience,"  ^  so  that  it 
is  not  surprising  that  we  find  the  name  Alexander  still  as- 
sociated with  medical  "experiments"  in  manuscripts  dating 
from  the  twelfth  to  fifteenth  centuries.^  One  of  his  cures 
for  epilepsy  he  learned  "from  a  rustic  in  Tuscany" 
(Thtisciaif)  but  afterwards  often  employed  with  success 
himself.^  "It  is  a  marvelous  and  exceptional  medicine 
which  you  will  communicate  to  no  one,"  concludes  Alexan- 

*Thus    in    Vendome    109     (see  ra    magni    Alexandri     Macedonii 

note  2,  p.  577)  besides  the  extracts  quod   facit   stomaticis  epilenticis." 

from    Alexander    of    Tralles    we  Steinschneider,    cited    by    Pusch- 

find  at  fol.  58,  "Alexander  (Aph-  mann     (1878)     I,     106,    has    also 

rodisiensis)     amicus    veritatis    in  noted  the   attribution  in   Hebrew 

tertio   libro    suo   ubi   de   febribus  MSS  to  Alexander  the  Great  of 

commemorat."     The   Arabs   seem  a  work  on  fever,  urine,  and  pulse, 

to     have     confused     these     two  presumably     identical     with     that 

Alexanders :     see     Steinschneider  mentioned  in  the   foregoing  note. 

(1862),  p.  61;  Puschmann  (1878),  *  Stephanus    (1567)    I,   176,  204, 

I,  94-5.  216,  225;  and  Puschmann,  II,  575, 
'  See  the  discussion  by  Choulant  are  a  few  specimens. 

in     Janus     (1845),     p.     52,     and  ^Amplon.    Quarto    204,    I2-I3th 

Henschel    in    De    Renzi    (1852-9)  century,    fols.  90-S,   Experimento- 

II,  II,  of  a  I2th  century  MS  at  rum  Alexandri  medici  collectio 
Breslau,  "Liber  Alexandri  de  succincta.  Digby  79,  13th  cen- 
agnoscendis  febribus  et  pulsibus  tury,  fols.  180-92V,  "Alexandrina 
et  urinis" ;  also  Puschmann  experimenta  de  libro  percompen- 
(1878)  I,  105-6,  concerning  BN  diose  extractata  meliora  ut  no- 
Greek  MS  2316,  which  seems  to  bis  visum  est  ad  singulas  egritu- 
be  a  late  Greek  translation  of  it, —  dines."  Additional  341 11,  15th 
another  instance  that  a  Greek  text  century,  fol.  77,  "Experimenta 
is   not   necessarily  the   original.  Alexandri,"  in  English. 

'Corpus     Christi     189,     ii-i2th  °  Steplianus  I,   156;   Puschmann 

century,  fols.  1-5,  "Antidotum  pig-       II,  563. 


XXV  POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE  579 

der,  a  rather  surprising  prohibition  in  view  of  the  fact  that 
it  was  a  popular  remedy  to  begin  with.  Folk-lore,  however, 
is  often  supposed  to  be  kept  secret.  Another  general  rule 
which  holds  true  in  Alexander's  case  is  that  these  empirical 
remedies  are  apt  to  be  the  most  superstitious,  and  conversely 
that  marvels  are  apt  to  be  supported  by  solemn  assurance 
of  their  experimental  testing. 

Two  centuries  ago  Mil  ward  wrote  of  Alexander  of  Extent 
Tralles,  "But  there  is  another  objection  to  our  author's  super- 
character  which  I  cannot  pretend  to  say  much  in  defence  stition. 
of,  and  that  is,  his  being  addicted  to  charms  and  amulets. 
It  is  very  surprising  that  one  who  discovers  so  much  judg- 
ment in  other  matters  should  show  so  much  weakness  in 
this,"  ^  Alexander  certainly  devotes  more  space  to  super- 
stition relatively  to  the  length  of  his  book  than  Aetius  does 
and  also  is  hospitable  to  a  wider  range  of  more  or  less 
magical  notions  and  practices.  One  notices,  however,  in 
his  book  that  the  treatment  of  certain  diseases,  such  as 
epilepsy,  colic,  gout,  and  quartan  fever,  is  more  likely  to 
involve  magical  and  astrological  procedure  than  that  of 
other  ailments  such  as  earache  and  disorder  of  the  spleen. 
This  is  also  apt  to  be  the  case  with  other  ancient  and 
medieval  medical  works.  But  it  is  doubtful  if  the  distinc- 
tion can  be  sharply  drawn  that  magic  was  resorted  to  more 
in  those  diseases  which  seemed  most  mysterious  and  incur- 
able. 

The  chief  circumstance  which  renders  some  parts  of  Physica. 
Alexander's  work  more  superstitious  than  others  is  that 
he  sometimes,  after  concluding  the  usual  medical  descrip- 
tion of  the  disease  and  prescriptions  for  it,  adds  a  list 
of  what  he  calls  physical  or  natural  medicines  (^uo-t/cd), 
which  are  for  the  most  part  ligatures  and  suspensions  but 
involve  also  the  employment  of  incantations  and  engraved 
images  or  characters.  Apparently  he  calls  these  remedies 
physica,  because  they  supposedly  act  by  some  peculiar  prop- 
erty or  occult  virtue  of  the  substance  which  is  bound  on 
^Milward  (1733),  p.  168. 


58o 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Occult 
virtue  of 
substances 
applied 
externally. 


or  suspended  and  constitute  a  sort  of  natural  magic.  Alex- 
ander explains  that  "since  some  cannot  observe  a  diet  nor 
endure  medicine,  they  compel  us  in  the  case  of  gout  to 
employ  physical  remedies  and  ligatures;  and  in  order  that 
the  well-trained  physician  may  be  instructed  in  every  side 
of  his  art  and  able  to  help  all  sick  persons  in  every  way,  I 
come  to  this  subject."  ^  This  rather  apologetic  tone  and 
the  fact  that  he  separates  the  physica  from  his  other  remedies 
show  that  he  regards  them  as  not  quite  on  the  same  level 
with  normal  medical  procedure.  He  goes  on  to  say,  how- 
ever, that  although  there  are  many  of  these  "physical" 
remedies  which  are  efficacious,  he  will  write  down  only 
those  proved  true  by  long  use.  In  discussing  fevers  he  again 
justifies  the  inclusion  of  physica  in  much  the  same  way  and 
says  that  those  now  mentioned  were  learned  by  him  during 
a  long-extended  practice  and  experience.^  It  is  to  be  noted 
that  some  of  these  chapters  on  physical  ligatures  do  not 
appear  in  the  Latin  version  in  three  books,  at  least  as  it  was 
printed  in  1504. 

One  ligature  which  is  "quite  celebrated  and  approved  by 
many"  and  which  instantly  lessens  the  pain  of  ulcers  in  the 
feet,  makes  use  of  muscles  from  a  wild  ass,  a  wild  boar, 
and  a  stork,  binding  the  right  muscles  about  the  patient's 
right  foot  and  the  left  muscles  about  the  left  foot.  Some 
persons,  however,  do  not  intertwine  the  muscles  of  the  stork 
with  the  others  but  put  them  separately  into  the  skin  of  a 
sea-calf.  Also  they  take  care  to  bind  the  other  muscles 
about  the  patient's  feet  when  the  moon  is  in  the  west  or  in  a 
sterile  sign  and  approaching  Saturn.  Others  bind  on  the 
tendons  and  claws  of  a  vulture,  or  the  feet  of  a  hare  who 
should  remain  alive. ^  Alexander  seems  to  regard  the  carcass 
of  the  ass  as  especially  remedial  in  the  case  of  epilepsy.  In 
Spain  he  learned  to  use  the  skull  of  an  ass  reduced  to  ashes 
and  he  recommends  employing  the  forehead  and  brain  of  an 


*  Stephanus  I,   312;    Puschmann 
n,  579- 

*  Stephanus  I,  345,  see  also  296 


and  339;   Puschmann  I,  407,  437. 
'Stephanus   I,  312;    Puschmann 

II,  579. 


XXV  POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE  581 

ass  as  amulets.^  A  suspension  for  quartan  fever  consists 
of  a  live  beetle  firmly  fastened  on  the  outside  of  a  red  linen 
cloth  and  hung  about  the  neck.  "This  is  true  and  often 
tested  by  experience,"  Alexander  assures  us.  Also  excellent 
for  this  purpose  are  hairs  from  a  goat's  cheek  or  a  green 
lizard  combined  with  clippings  of  the  patient's  finger  nails 
and  toe  nails.  It  is  confirmed  by  the  testimony  of  all 
"natural"  physicians  that  the  blood  qui  primus  a  virgine 
fuerit  excretus  is  naturally  hostile  to  quartan  fever.  Even 
if  the  girl  is  not  chaste,  the  blood  will  be  efficacious,  if 
applied  to  the  patient's  right  hand  or  arm.^  Alexander  knew 
a  man  who  treated  quartan  fever  by  giving  an  undergarment 
of  the  patient  to  a  woman  in  childbirth  to  wear,  after  which 
the  patient  wore  it  again  and  was  cured  "miraculously  by 
some  antipathy  and  occult  influence."  ^ 

The  materials  employed  in  Alexander's  therapeutics  are    Other 
sometimes  those  which  we  associate  especially  with  magic  l^^^^l^ 
arts,  such  as  the  hair  and  nail-parings  already  mentioned,    ligatures 
Against  epilepsy  he  employs  nails  from  a  cross  or  wrecked    amulets, 
ship,  or  the  blood-stained  shirt  of  a  gladiator  or  criminal 
who  has  been  slain.     The  nails  are  bound  to  the  patient's 
arm ;  the  shirt  is  burned  and  the  patient  given  the  ashes  in 
wine  seven  times.     The  use  of  a  nail  from  a  cross  is  a 
method  ascribed  to  Asclepiades.     Other  materials  recom- 
mended by   Alexander  against   gout  and   epilepsy   include 
the  herb  night-shade,  the  stones  magnet  and  aetites,  blood 
of  a  swallow  and  urine  of  a  boy,  chameleons  in  varied  forms, 
and  the  stones  found  in  dissected  swallows  of  which  we 
have  heard  before  and  shall  hear  yet  again.     For  Alexander 
these  stones  are  black  and  white,  but  he  states  that  they  are 
not  found  in  all  young  swallows  but  are  said  to  appear  only 
in  the  first-born,  so  that  one  often  has  to  dissect  a  great 
many  birds  before  one  finds  any.      In  these  passages  on 
Physica  Alexander  cites  such  authors  of  magical  reputation 

*  Stephanus  I,   156;   Puschmann       I,  437. 

'  Stephanus   I,  345;   Puschmann       rtft  (cat  Xo-yw  dpp7T;o. 


S82 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Incanta- 
tions. 


as  Ostanes  and  Democritus,  and  tells  how  the  latter  suffered 
in  youth  from  epilepsy  until  an  oracle  from  Delphi  instructed 
him  to  make  use  of  the  worms  in  goats'  brains.  When  a 
goat  sneezes  violently,  some  of  these  worms  are  expelled 
into  his  nostrils,  whence  they  should  be  carefully  extracted 
in  a  cloth  without  allowing  them  to  touch  the  ground. 
Either  one  or  three  of  them  should  then  be  worn  about  the 
epileptic's  neck  wrapped  in  the  thin  skin  of  a  black  sheep.-^ 

One  passage  has  already  been  cited  where  astrological 
conditions  were  observed.  Alexander  sometimes  prescribes 
the  day  of  the  month  upon  which  things  shall  be  done;  an 
oil,  for  instance,  is  to  be  prepared  on  the  fifth  of  March.^ 
In  one  place  Alexander  advises  engraving  upon  a  copper 
die  a  lion,  a  half -moon,  a  star,  and  the  name  of  the  beast. 
This  is  to  be  worn  enclosed  in  a  gold  ring  upon  the  fourth 
finger.^  That  the  lion  may  not  stand  for  a  sign  of  the 
zodiac  is  suggested  by  another  instruction  concerning  an 
engraved  stone  to  be  set  in  a  gold  ring,  and  which  is  to  be 
carved  with  a  figure  of  Hercules  suffocating  a  lion.*  For 
gout,  however,  one  writes  a  verse  of  Homer  on  a  copper 
plate  when  the  moon  is  in  Libra  or  Leo.^  For  colic  one  in- 
scribes upon  an  iron  ring  with  an  octangular  circumference 
a  charm  beginning,  "Flee,  flee,  colic."  ^ 

The  employment  of  such  incantations  is  expressly  justi- 
fied by  Alexander,  who  maintains  that  even  "the  most 
divine"  Galen,  who  once  thought  that  incantations  were  of 
no  avail,  came  after  a  long  time  and  much  experience  to 
be  convinced  that  they  were  of  great  efficacy.  Alexander 
then  quotes  from  a  treatise  which  is  not  extant  but  which 
he  asserts  is  a  work  by  Galen  entitled.  On  medical  treatment 
in  Homer.'^  "So  some  think  that  incantations  are  like  old- 
wives'  tales  and  so  I  thought  for  a  long  while,  but  in  process 


*  For  the  passages  in  this  para- 
graph see  Stephanus  I,  156-7, 
313;  Puschmann  I,  561,  S^7-73- 

^  Stephanus  I,  312. 

*  Stephanus  I,  281 ;  Puschmann 
11,  475. 

*  Stephanus  I,  296;   Puschmann 


n,  377- 
'  Stephanus  I,  313. 


"  Stephanus 

11,  377- 

'  Stephanus 
n,  475. 


296 ;   Puschmann 
281 ;   Puschmann 


XXV  POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE  583 

of  time  from  perfectly  plain  instances  I  have  become  per- 
suaded that  there  is  force  in  them,  for  I  have  experienced 
their  aid  in  the  case  of  persons  stung  by  scorpions.  And 
no  less  in  the  case  of  bones  stuck  in  the  throat,  which  were 
straightway  expelled  by  an  incantation."  Alexander  him- 
self thereupon  continues,  "If  such  is  the  testimony  of 
divinest  Galen  and  many  other  ancients,  what  prevents  us 
too  from  communicating  to  you  those  which  we  have  learned 
from  experience  and  which  we  have  received  from  trust- 
worthy friends?" 

Both  incantations  and  observance  of  astrological  condi-  Conjura- 
tions play  an  important  part  in  the  instructions  given  by  an"herb 
Alexander  for  digging  and  plucking  with  imprecations  an 
herb  to  be  used  in  the  treatment  of  fluxions  of  hands  or 
feet.  "When  the  moon  is  in  Aquarius  under  Pisces,  dig 
before  sunset,  not  touching  the  root.  After  digging  with 
two  fingers  of  the  left  hand,  namely,  the  thumb  and  middle 
finger,  say,  'I  address  you,  I  address  you,  sacred  herb.  I 
summon  you  to-morrow  to  the  house  of  Philia  to  stay  the 
fluxion  of  feet  and  hands  of  this  man  or  this  woman.  But 
I  adjure  you  by  the  great  name,  laoth,  Sabaoth,  God  who 
established  the  earth  and  fixed  the  sea  abounding  in  fluid 
floods,  who  desiccated  Lot's  wife  and  made  her  a  statue  of 
salt,  receive  the  spirit  of  thy  mother  earth  and  its  powers, 
and  dry  up  this  fluxion  of  feet  or  of  hands  of  this  man  or 
woman.'  On  the  morrow  ere  sunrise,  taking  the  bone  of 
some  dead  animal,  dig  up  the  root,  and  holding  it  say,  *I 
adjure  you  by  the  sacred  names,  laoth,  Sabaoth,  Adonai, 
Eloi,'  and  sprinkle  a  pinch  of  salt  on  that  root,  saying,  'As 
this  salt  is  not  increased,  so  be  not  the  ailment  of  this  man 
or  of  this  woman.'  Then  bind  one  end  of  the  root  to  the 
patient,  taking  care  that  it  is  not  moist,  and  suspend  the  rest 
of  it  over  the  fire  for  360  days."  ^  The  mention  of  mother 
earth  in  this  charm  perhaps  indicates  an  ultimate  pagan 
origin,  but  the  allusions  to  one  God,  and  to  incidents  in  the 
Old  Testament,  and  the  use  of  names  of  spirits  show  Jewish 
*  Stephanus  I,  314;   Puschmann  II,  585. 


584 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Medieval 
version 
seems  less 
super- 
stitious 
than  the 
original 
text. 


Mar- 
cellus : 
date  and 
identity. 


or  Christian  influence,  while  the  number  360  perhaps  points 
to  the  Gnostics. 

While  in  conformity  with  the  character  of  our  investiga- 
tion we  have  emphasized  those  passages  in  Alexander  which 
are  suggestive  of  magic  and  its  methods,  it  should  be  said 
that  many  of  the  passages  which  we  have  cited  are  appar- 
ently ^  not  found  in  the  medieval  Latin  versions  which  seem 
to  omit  many,  although  not  all,  of  the  chapters  devoted  to 
physical  ligatures.  Here  then  apparently  is  a  case  where 
the  early  medieval  translator  and  adapter,  instead  of  re- 
taining and  emphasizing  the  superstition  of  the  past,  has 
largely  purged  his  text  of  it.  But  we  have  next  to  consider 
a  Latin  work,  written  apparently  about  the  year  400  A.  D. 
and  known  to  us  through  two  manuscripts  of  the  ninth 
century,  in  which  magic  is  far  more  rampant  than  in  any 
version  of  Alexander  of  Tralles.  Judging,  however,  from 
the  small  number  of  extant  manuscripts,  it  was  less  influen- 
tial through  the  medieval  period  than  was  Alexander's  book. 

The  De  medicamentis  opens  in  one  of  the  two  extant 
manuscripts  with  a  dedicatory  letter  from  "Marcellus,  an 
illustrious  man  of  the  main  office  of  Theodosius  the 
Elder  (?)"  to  his  sons.^  This  ascription  is  generally  ac- 
cepted as  genuine,  and  Grimm  believed  this  to  be  the  same 
Marcellus  as  the  physician  who  is  gratefully  mentioned,  to- 
gether with  his  sons,  then  mere  infants,  in  the  letters  of 
Libanius,  whose  severe  headaches  Marcellus  had  alleviated, 
and  as  the  Marcellus  magister  officioriim  who  is  mentioned 
twice  in  the  Theodosian  Code  under  the  year  395.  The 
date  of  the  De  medicamentis  may  be  further  fixed  from  its 
including  "a  singular  remedy  for  spleen  which  the  patriarch 
Gamaliel  recently  revealed  from  proved  experiments."    This 


^If  the  MSS,  which  I  have  not 
examined,  agree  with  the  1504 
edition. 

'  Both  in  BN  6880  and  the  edi- 
tion of  Basel,  1536,  "Marcellus 
vir  inluster  ex  magno  officio  Theo- 
dosii  Sen.  filiis  suis  salutem 
d(icit)."  In  the  MS,  however, 
a    later    hand   has   written   above 


the  now  faded  line  an  incorrect 
copy  in  which  "Theodosii  Sen." 
is  replaced  by  "theodosiensi." 
Helmreich  (1889),  on  the  other 
hand,  has  replaced  "ex  magno 
officio"  by  "ex  magistro  officio." 
It  is  perhaps  open  to  doubt 
whether  the  "Sen."  goes  with 
"Theodosii"  or  "Marcellus." 


XXV  POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE  585 

Gamaliel  was  Jewish  patriarch  at  Constantinople  from  some 
time  before  395  on  to  415  or  later.  The  question,  however, 
of  Marcellus'  authorship  is  complicated  by  the  fact  that  he 
is  twice  cited  in  the  work  itself.  One  of  these  passages 
concerns  an  "oxyporium  which  Nero  used  for  the  digestion, 
which  Marcellus  the  eminent  physician  revealed,  which  we 
too  have  tested  in  practice."  ^  This  sounds  as  if  some  later 
person  had  had  a  hand  in  the  work  as  it  has  reached  us,  since 
Marcellus  himself  would  scarcely  have  cited  another  person 
of  the  same  name  without  some  distinguishing  epithet. 
Furthermore  Aetius  cites  a  Marcellus  for  a  passage  which 
does  not  appear  in  the  De  medicamentis  concerning  wolfish 
or  canine  insanity,  in  which  men  imagine  themselves  to  be 
wolves  or  dogs  and  act  like  them  during  the  night  in  the 
month  of  February.  But  the  De  medicamentis  as  a  whole 
is  of  the  character  promised  by  Marcellus  in  the  introduc- 
tory letter  to  his  sons  and  so  may  be  taken  as  his  work. 

The  empiricism  which  we  have  already  noted  in  Alex-  "Mar- 
ander  of  Tralles  becomes  most  pronounced  and  most  ex- 
treme in  Marcellus,  who  indeed  is  often  called  Marcellus 
Empiricus  on  this  account,  and  many  of  whose  chapter  and 
other  headings  ^  terminate  with  these  words  descriptive  of 
their  contents,  "various  rationa-1  and  natural  remedies 
learned  by  experience"  (remedia  rationabilia  et  physica 
diversa  de  experimentis) .  In  his  preface,  too,  he  speaks  of 
his  book  not  as  De  medicamentis  but  as  De  empiricis.  He 
has,  it  is  true,  utilized  "the  old  authorities  of  the  medical 
art  set  down  in  the  Latin  language,"  and  likewise  more 
recent  writers  and  "the  works  of  studious  men"  who  were 
not  especially  trained  in  medicine ;  but  he  also  includes  what 
he  has  learned  from  hearsay  or  from  personal  experience, 
and  "even  remedies  chanced  upon  by  rustics  and  the  popu- 
lace and  simples  which  they  have  tested  by  experience." 
One  prescription,  which  he  characterizes  as  efficacious  be- 
yond  human   hope   and    incapable   of   being   satisfactorily 

'Cap.  20  (1889),  p.  204.  those    which    mark   the    openings 

^  In    BN    6880    there   are    other      of  the  36  chapters, 
headings  written  in   capitals   than 


celhis  Em- 
piricus." 


S86  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

lauded,  he  purchased  from  an  old-wife  of  Africa  who  cured 
many  at  Rome  by  it,  while  the  author  himself  has  employed 
it  in  the  cure  of  "several  persons  neither  of  humble  rank 
nor  unknown,  whose  names  it  is  superfluous  to  mention." 
This  remedy  is  a  concoction  of  such  things  as  ashes  of  deer- 
horn,  nine  grains  of  white  pepper,  a  little  myrrh,  and  an 
African  snail  pounded  shell  and  all  while  still  alive  in  a 
mortar  and  then  mixed  with  Falernian  wine.  Very  detailed 
and  explicit  directions  are  given  as  to  its  preparation  and 
administration,  including  an  instruction  to  drink  the  dose 
facing  towards  the  east.^  In  another  passage  Marcellus 
says  of  certain  compounds,  "If  there  is  any  faith,  both  I 
myself  have  always  found  them  by  experience  to  be  useful 
remedies  and  I  can  state  that  others  are  of  the  same  mind; 
and  I  will  add  this,  that  other  medicines  can  not  compare  to 
this  liniment,  which  in  similar  cases  several  of  my  friends, 
whom  I  trust  as  I  do  myself,  have  affirmed  on  oath  they 
have  found  by  experience  a  remarkable  cure."  ^  Of  an  eye- 
remedy  he  remarks,  "And  that  we  may  believe  the  author 
of  this  remedy  from  experience,  he  states  that  after  he  had 
been  blind  for  twelve  years  it  restored  his  sight  within 
twenty  days."  ^  Marcellus  also  frequently  couples  marvel- 
ousness  with  experimentation,  saying,  "You  will  experience 
a  wonderful  remedy."  In  one  passage  he  uses  the  word 
"experiment  as  a  verb  rather  than  as  a  noun,  coining  a  new 
expression,  experimentatum  remedium/  but  his  commonest 
expressions  are  de  experimento  or  de  experimentis,  ex- 
pertum,  and  experieris  or  experietur.^    Some  of  his  "experi- 

'Cap.  29   (1889),  pp.  304-6.  123,  is;  129,  21;  133,  10;  145,  33; 

'Cap.  35  (1889),  p.  361.  148,  25;  149,  26;  160,  18;  176,  5; 

'Cap.  8   (1889),  p.  80.  178,  25;  186,  15;  190,  20;  192,  31; 

*Cap.  5   (1889),  p.  49.  211,   i;  222,   18;  224,  31;  230,  3; 

''For  such  mentions  of  experi-  235,   15;  236,   14;  239,  8  and  26; 

ence  and  experiment  see  the  fol-  242,   8   and    23;    248,   20;    256,  9; 

lowing  passages   in   the   1889  edi-  258,  5;   264,  21;  276,  35;   281,   19 

tion,    numbers    referring    to    page  and  27;   282,    15;   308,  21;   312,  6 

and    line:    31,    7;    34,    3;    35,    14;  and   19  and  22;  314,  25;  326,  28; 

44,  2;  53,  i;  58,  21;  64,  34;  65,  30;  327,  13;  334,  29;  343,  23;  351,  23 

66,  26;  72,  22;  73,  7;  74,  2;  77,  9;  and  25;  353,  4;   354,   19;  356,  6; 

80,    28;    81,    29;    89,    3    and    29;  362,  32;  370,  22  and  37. 
96,   14  and  31;   102,  27;   120,  32; 


XXV  POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE  587 

ences"  really  are  purposive  experiments,  as  where  one  .dis- 
covers whether  a  tumor  is  scrofulous  by  applying  an  earth- 
worm to  it.  Then  put  the  worm  on  a  leaf  and  if  the  tumor 
was  scrofulous,  the  worm  will  turn  into  earth.^  The  follow- 
ing experiment  indicates  that  sufferers  from  spleen  should 
drink  in  vinegar  the  root  or  dried  leaves  of  the  tamarisk. 
Give  tamarisk  to  a  pig  to  eat  for  nine  days,  then  kill  the 
animal  and  you  will  find  it  without  a  spleen.^ 

As  Marcellus  appeals  the  most  to  experience,  so  he  is  Super- 
by  far  the  most  given  to  superstition  and  folk-lore  of  our  character 
three  authors.  Practically  his  entire  work  is  of  the  char-  of  his 
acter  of  the  passages  devoted  to  Physic  a  by  Alexander  of 
Tralles.  He  indulges  in  no  medical  theory,  he  does  not 
diagnose  diseases,  nor  prescribe  a  regimen  of  health  in  the 
form  of  bathing,  diet,  and  exercise.  His  work  is  wholly 
composed  of  medicaments  and  for  the  most  part  empirical 
ones.  Besides  the  elaborate  compounds  which  were 
so  frequent  in  Aetius  and  Alexander,  he  is  extremely 
addicted  to  absurd  rigmarole  and  all  sorts  of  superstitious 
practices  in  the  application  or  administration  of  medicinal 
simples.  His  pharmacy  includes  not  only  herbs  and  gems, 
to  which  he  attributes  occult  virtue  and  which  he  sometimes 
directs  to  have  engraven  with  characters  and  figures,  such 
as  SSS  or  a  dragon  surrounded  with  seven  rays  ^ — the 
emblem  of  the  Agathodaemon,  but  also  all  kinds  of  animals, 
reptiles,  and  parts  of  the  same,  after  the  fashion  of  Pliny's 
medicine.  He  is  constantly  calling  into  requisition  such 
things  as  the  ashes  of  a  mole,  the  blood  of  a  bat,  the  brains 
of  a  mouse,  the  gall  of  a  hyena,  the  hoofs  of  a  live  ass,  the 
liver  of  a  wolf,  woman's  milk,  sea-hares,  a  white  spider 
with  very  long  legs,  and  centipedes  or  multipedes,  especially 
the  variety  that  rolls  up  into  a  ball  when  touched.  But  it  is 
scarcely  feasible  to  separate  Marcellus'  materials  from  his 
procedure,  so  we  will  begin  to  consider  them  together  in 
some  prescriptions  where  animals  play  the  leading  part. 

*Cap.  15  (1889),  p.  146.  "Caps.   20   and   24    (1889),   pp. 

'Cap.  23  (1889),  p.  239.  208  and  244. 


588 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


For  those  suffering-  from  stone  is  recommended  a  remedy 
prepared  in  the  following  fashion.  In  August  shut  up  in  a 
dry  place  for  three  days  a  goat,  preferably  a  wild  one  who 
is  one  year  old,  and  feed  him  on  nothing  but  laurel  and 
give  him  no  water  to  drink ;  finally  on  the  third  day,  which 
should  fall  on  a  Thursday  or  Sunday,  kill  him.  Both  the 
person  who  kills  the  goat  and  the  patient  should  be  chaste 
and  pure.  Cut  the  goat's  throat  and  collect  his  blood — it 
is  best  if  the  blood  is  collected  by  naked  boys — and  burn  it 
to  an  ash  in  an  earthen  pot.  After  combining  it  with  vari- 
ous herbs  and  drugs,  there  are  further  directions  to  follow 
as  to  how  it  may  best  be  administered  to  the  patient.  Mar- 
cellus,  by  the  way,  affirms  that  adamant  can  be  broken  only 
by  goat's  blood.^ 

The  following  prescription  involves  the  familiar  super- 
stition that  a  rabbit's  foot  is  lucky :  "Cut  off  the  foot  of  a 
live  rabbit  and  take  hairs  from  under  its  belly  and  let  it  go. 
Of  those  hairs  or  wool  make  a  strong  thread  and  with  it 
bind  the  rabbit's  foot  to  the  body  of  the  patient  and  you  will 
find  a  marvelous  remedy.  But  the  remedy  will  be  even  more 
efficacious,  so  that  it  is  hardly  credible,  if  by  chance  you  find 
that  bone,  namely,  the  rabbit's  ankle-bone,  in  the  dung  of  a 
wolf,  which  you  should  guard  so  that  it  neither  touches  the 
earth  nor  is  touched  by  woman.  Nor  should  any  woman 
touch  that  thread  made  of  the  rabbit's  wool."  Marcellus 
further  recommends  that  in  releasing  the  rabbit  after  taking 
its  wool  you  should  say,  "Flee,  flee,  little  rabbit,  and  take  the 
pain  away  with  you."  ^ 

Of  such  magical  transfer  of  disease  to  other  animals  or 
objects  there  are  a  number  of  examples.  Toothache  may 
be  stopped  by  standing  on  the  ground  under  the  open  sky 
and  spitting  in  a  frog's  mouth  and  asking  it  to  take  the 
toothache  away  with  it  and  then  releasing  it.^  Even  con- 
sumptives who  seem  certain  to  die  and  who  labor  continually 
with  an  unbearable  cough,  may  be  cured  by  giving  them 


*Cap.  26  (1889),  pp.  264-6. 
'Cap.   29    (1889),   p.   311;    and 


see  cap.  28,  p.  29I 
'  Cap.  12,  p.  123. 


XXV 


POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE 


589 


to  drink  for  three  days  the  saliva  or  foam  of  a  horse.  "You 
will  indeed  cure  the  patient  without  delay,  but  the  horse- 
will  die  suddenly."  ^  Splenetic  persons  are  benefited  by 
imposing  anyone  of  three  kinds  of  fish  upon  the  spleen  and 
then  replacing  the  fish  alive  in  the  sea.^  Warts  may  be 
got  rid  of  by  rubbing  them  with  something  the  moment  you 
see  a  star  falling  in  the  sky;  but  if  you  rub  them  with  your 
bare  hand,  you  will  simply  transfer  them  to  it.^  Another 
superstition  connected  with  falling  stars  which  Marcellus 
records  is  that  one  will  be  free  from  sore  eyes  for  as  many 
years  as  he  can  count  numbers  while  a  star  is  falling,*  The 
first  time  you  hear  or  see  a  swallow,  hasten  silently  to  a 
spring  or  well  and  anoint  your  eyes  with  the  water  and  pray 
God  that  you  may  not  have  sore  eyes  that  year,  and  the 
swallows  will  bear  away  all  pain  from  your  eyes.^  With 
slight  variations  the  same  procedure  may  be  employed  to 
prevent  toothache.  In  this  case  you  fill  your  mouth  with 
water,  rub  your  teeth  with  the  middle  fingers  of  both  hands, 
and  say,  "Swallow,  I  say  to  you,  as  this  will  not  again  be 
in  my  beak,  so  may  my  teeth  not  ache  all  year  long."  ^ 
Marcellus  advises  anyone  whose  nose  is  stuffed  up  to  blow 
it  on  a  piece  of  parchment,  and,  folding  this  up  like  a  letter, 
cast  it  into  the  public  way,'^ — which  would  very  likely  spread 
the  germs,  if  not  take  away  the  cold. 

In  his  preface  Marcellus  refers  to  Pliny  as  one  of  his   piiny  and 
authorities  and  many  of  his  quaint  animal  remedies  will    compared 

be  found  substantially  duplicated  in  the  Natural  History,    pn  green 
-^  lizards  as 

Both,  for  example,  state  that  one  can  stop  one's  nose  from    eye  cures. 

running  by  kissing  a  mule.^    Marcellus,  however,  adds  much 

from  other  sources  or  of  his  own.     This  may  be  illustrated 

by  comparing  their  accounts  of  the  use  of  lizards  to  cure  eye 

diseases.^     Marcellus  omits  the  following  portion  of  Pliny's 

account :  "Some  shut  up  a  green  lizard  in  a  new  earthen  pot, 


*  Cap.  16,  p.  166. 
"Cap.  23,  p.  238. 
'  Cap.  34,  P-  357- 

*  Cap.  8,  p.  69. 
'  Cap.  8,  p.  66. 


Cap.  12,  p.  125. 

Cap.  10,  p.  113. 

Cap.  10,  p.  112;  NH  30,  II. 

Cap.  8,  p.  68;    NH   29,   38. 


590  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

and  they  mark  the  Httle  stones  called  cinaedia,  which  are 
bound  on  for  tumors  of  the  groin,  with  nine  signs  and  take 
out  one  daily.  On  the  ninth  day  they  let  the  lizard  go,  and 
keep  the  pebbles  for  pains  of  the  eyes."  Pliny  next  proceeds  : 
"Others  put  earth  under  a  green  lizard  that  has  been  blinded 
and  shut  it  up  in  a  glass  vase  with  rings  of  solid  iron  or  gold. 
When  through  the  glass  the  lizard  is  seen  to  have  recovered 
its  sight,  it  is  released  and  the  rings  are  used  for  sore  eyes." 
This  recipe  is  in  Marcellus  who,  however,  words  it  dif- 
ferently and  adds  that  the  lizard  must  be  blinded  with  a 
copper  needle,  that  the  rings  may  be  of  silver,  electrum, 
or  copper,  that  the  vase  must  be  carefully  sealed  and  opened 
on  the  fifth  or  seventh  day  following,  and  that  one  should 
not  only  wear  the  rings  afterwards  on  one's  fingers  but  also 
frequently  apply  them  to  one's  eyes  and  strengthen  the  sight 
by  looking  through  them.  He  further  cautions  to  leave  the 
vase  in  a  clean  grassy  spot,  to  collect  the  rings  only  after 
the  lizard  has  departed,  to  catch  the  lizard  in  the  first  place 
on  a  Thursday  in  September  between  the  nineteenth  and 
twenty-fifth  day  of  the  moon,  and  to  have  the  operation  per- 
formed by  a  very  pure  and  chaste  man,  Marcellus  also 
states  that  an  amulet  made  either  of  the  eyes  of  the  said 
lizard  enclosed  in  a  lead  bull  or  gold  coin,  or  of  its  blood 
caught  on  clean  wool  and  wrapped  in  purple  cloth  will 
effectually  prevent  eye  diseases.  Meanwhile  Pliny  for  his 
part  has  gone  on  to  tell  how  efficacious  the  ashes  of  green 
lizards  are. 
More  Marcellus  employs  green  lizards  in  other  connections 

hzardry.  which  are  not  paralleled  in  Pliny.  To  stay  colic  one  binds 
about  the  patient  three  times  with  an  incantation  a  string 
with  which  a  copper  needle  has  been  threaded  and  drawn 
through  a  lizard's  eyes,  after  which  the  reptile  is  released 
at  the  same  point  where  it  was  captured.^  In  another  pas- 
sage Marcellus  recommends  the  drawing  by  a  silver  needle 
of  threads  of  nine  different  colors  other  than  black  or  white 
through  the  eyes  of  a  new-born  puppy  before  they  open  and 
'  Cap.  29,  p.  313. 


XXV  POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE  59i 

ita  ut  per  anum  eiiis  exeunt,  after  which  the  puppy  is  to  be 
thrown  into  the  river.^  But  to  return  to  our  Hzards.  For 
those  suffering  from  Hver  complaint  the  Hver  of  a  Hzard 
is  to  be  extracted  with  the  point  of  a  reed  and  bound  in 
purple  or  black  cloth  to  the  patient's  right  side  or  suspended 
from  his  arm,  while  the  lizard  is  to  be  dismissed  alive  with 
these  words,  "Lo,  I  send  you  away  alive;  see  to  it  that  no 
one  whom  I  touch  henceforth  has  liver  complaint."  ^  To 
insure  a  wife's  fidelity  one  touches  her  with  the  tip  of  a 
lizard's  tail  which  has  been  cut  off  by  the  left  hand.^  Here 
again  the  lizard  is  released  but  apparently  is  not  expected 
to  survive  for  long,  since  one  is  instructed  to  "hold  the  tail 
shut  in  the  palm  of  the  same  hand  until  it  dies."  In  a 
fourth  example  the  lizard  is  neither  mutilated  nor  released 
but  hung  in  the  doorway  of  a  splenetic's  bedroom  where  it 
will  touch  his  head  and  left  hand  as  he  comes  and  goes.^ 

One  or  two  other  prescriptions  may  be  added  where  the   Use  of 
procedure  is  connected  with  herbs  or  stones   rather  than   and"an 
with  animals.     On  entering  a  city  one  is  advised  to  pick  up   herb, 
some  of  the  pebbles  lying  in  the  road  before  the  city  gate, 
stating  that  they  are  being  collected  for  headache.     Then 
bind  one  of  them  on  the  head  and  throw  the  others  behind 
your  back  without  looking  around.^     A  certain  herb  must 
be  gathered  on  Thursday  in  a  waning  moon.     When  it  is 
administered  in  drink,  the  recipient  must  take  it  standing 
and  facing  the  east.     He  receives  the  cup  from  the  right 
hand  and  then,  in  order  not  to  look  back,  returns  it  to  the 
left  to  him  who  gave  it.     Only  these  two  persons  should 
touch  the  drink.^ 

Right  and  left,  as  just  illustrated,  are  much  observed    Right 
in  Marcellus'  medicine.      When  a  tooth  aches  on  the  left    numb^er 
side  of  the  mouth,  a  hot  cooked  dried  bean  is  applied  to 
the  right  elbow  for  three  days,  a  process  which  is  reversed 

_  *  Cap.  29,  p.  314.     Pliny  has   a  rendaque   eius   dum   cum    ea   cois 

similar  procedure  with  a  frog  and  tange." 
a  reed.  ■*  Cap.  23,  p.  239. 

'Cap.  22,  p.  230.  °  Cap.  I,  p.  34. 

'  Cap.  2)3,  P-  347,  "mulierem  ve-  °  Cap.  25,  p.  247. 


592 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Incanta- 
tions and 
charac- 
ters. 


if  the  tooth  is  on  the  right  side.^  The  following  exercise 
recommended  for  a  stiff  neck  would  seem  to  stand  more 
chance  of  success  than  most  of  Marcellus'  prescriptions. 
While  fasting  the  patient  should  spit  on  his  right  hand  and 
rub  his  right  thigh,  and  then  do  the  same  with  his  left 
hand  and  thigh.  Thrice  repeated  this  is  warranted  to  work 
an  immediate  cure.^  A  ring  worn  on  the  middle  finger  of 
the  left  hand  is  said  to  stop  hiccough.^  The  power  of  the 
planets  or  of  mere  number  is  indicated  in  the  advice,  given 
several  times,  to  make  seven  knots  in  a  string.*  Once  in- 
structions are  given  to  make  as  many  knots  as  there  are 
letters  in  the  patient's  name.^ 

Incantations  and  characters,  as  has  already  been  inci- 
dentally illustrated,  abound  in  Marcellus'  pages.  Some  are 
in  Greek,  some  in  Latin,  some  perhaps  in  Celtic;  many, 
as  we  have  seen,  are  coherent  statements,  commands,  or 
requests;  many  others  are  to  all  appearance  a  jargon  of 
meaningless  words,  like  the  jingle,  Argidam,  margidam, 
sturgidam,^  which  is  to  be  repeated  seven  times  on  Tuesday 
and  Thursday  in  a  waning  moon  to  cure  toothache.  Mar- 
cellus well  calls  one  of  these  carmen  idioticumJ  For  stom- 
ach and  intestinal  troubles  he  recommends  pressing  the 
abdomen  with  the  left  thumb  and  saying,  "Adam,  bedam. 
alam,  betur,  alem,  botum."  This  is  to  be  repeated  nine 
times,  then  one  touches  the  earth  with  the  same  thumb  and 
spits,  then  says  the  charm  nine  more  times,  and  again  for  a 
third  series  of  nine,  touching  the  ground  and  spitting  nine 
times  also.  Alahanda,  alahandi,  alamho  is  another  incanta- 
tion, variously  repeated  thrice  with  hands  clasped  above 
and  below  the  abdomen.  Yet  another  consists  in  rubbing 
the  abdomen  with  the  left  thumb  and  two  little  fingers  and 
saying,  "A  tree  stood  in  the  middle  of  the  sea  and  there 
hung  an  urn  full  of  human  intestines;  three  virgins  went 


*  Cap.  12,  p.  126. 

'Cap.  18,  p.  178. 

'  Cap.  17,  p.  176. 

*Cap.  32,  pp.  22,7,  338,  340. 

'Cap.  8,  p.  70. 

°  Cap.  12,  p.  123. 


'  Cap.  3^,  p.  379.  Marcellus  em- 
ploys the  phrase,  of  course,  to 
indicate  a  private  or  personal  in- 
cantation, and  as  a  matter  of  fact 
it  is  somewhat  less  absurd  than 
a  number  of  others. 


XXV 


POST-CLASSICAL  MEDICINE 


593 


around  it,  two  make  it  fast,  one  revolves  it."  As  you 
repeat  this  thrice,  you  touch  the  ground  thrice  and  spit,  but 
if  the  charm  is  for  veterinary  purposes,  for  the  words 
"human  intestines"  should  be  substituted  "the  intestines  of 
mules"  or  horses  or  asses  as  the  case  may  be.^  The  fol- 
lowing is  a  specimen  of  the  characters  prescribed  by  Mar- 
cellus :  ^ 

A^MGKI A 

A^M  e  KI  A 

A^M  GKI A 

It  is  perhaps  worth  while  to  point  out  in  concluding  this   The  art  of 
chapter  that  apparently  at  no  time  during  the  period  of    sm-vives^ 

barbarian  invasions  and  early  medieval  centuries  did  medical   the  bar- 

1-  •     1      •        1  TUT-     1  banan 

practice  or  literature  cease  entirely  in  the  west.     We  have   invasions. 

seen  that  there  is  reason  to  suspect  that  portions  of  the  work 

ascribed  to  Marcellus  may  be  contributions  of  the  centuries 

following  him,  and  that  there  were  early  medieval  Latin 

translations  of  the  works  of  Oribasius  and  Alexander  of 

Tralles.     Furthermore,  the  laws  of  the  German  kingdoms, 

the  allusions  of  contemporary  chroniclers  and  men  of  letters, 

the  advice  of  Gregory  the  Great  to  a  sick  archbishop  to  seek 

medical  assistance,  and  many  other  bits  of  evidence  ^  show 

that  physicians  were  fairly  numerous  and  in  good  repute, 

and  that  medieval  Christians  at  no  time  depended  entirely 

upon  the  healing  virtues  of  relics  of  the  saints  or  other 

miraculous  powers  credited  to  the  church  or  divine  answer 

to  prayer. 


'  Cap.  28,  p.  301. 

*Cap.  29,  p.  310.  For  further 
instances  of  incantations  and  char- 
acters in  the  De  medicamentis  see 
page  no,  Hnes  18-27;  in,  26-33; 
112,  29  -  113,  2;  n6,  8-n  ;  133,  18- 
22,  26-31;   139,  17-26;   142,  19-26; 


149,  4-11;  151,  18-33;  152,  9-14, 
19-24;  180,  1-3;  220,  11-20;  221, 
2-6;  223,  15-18;  241,  1-6,  14-22; 
244,  26-28;  248,  16-19;  260,  22- 
24;  295,  18-22;  333,  9-is;  382, 
16-18. 
^Daremberg  (1870)  I,  257-8. 


CHAPTER  XXVI 

PSEUDO-LITERATURE   IN    NATURAL   SCIENCE   OF    THE   EARLY 

MIDDLE  AGES 

General  character — Medicine  of  Pliny — Herbarium  of  Apuleius — 
Specimens  of  its  occult  science — A  "Precantation  of  all  herbs" — Other 
treatises  accompanying  the  Herbarium — Cosmography  of  Aethicus — 
Its  medieval  influence — Character  of  the  work — Its  attitude  to  marvels 
— The  Geoponica — Magic  and  astrology  therein — Dioscorides — Textual 
history  of  the  De  materia  medica — Alterations  made  in  the  Greek  text 
— Dioscorides  little  known  to  Latins  before  the  middle  ages — Partial 
versions  in  Latin — De  herbis  femininis — The  fuller  Latin  versions — 
Peter  of  Abano's  account  of  the  medieval  versions — Pseudo-Dioscorides 
on  stones — Conclusions  from  the  textual  history  of  Dioscorides — Macer 
on  herbs;  its  great  currency — Problem  of  date  and  author — Virtues 
ascribed  to  herbs — Experiments  of  Macer. 

General       A  CLASS  of  writings  which  seems  to  have  been  very  char- 
character,    ^(^tej-jsi-jc  Qf  ^i^g  waning  culture  of  the  decHning  Roman 

Empire  and  the  scanty  erudition  of  the  early  medieval  period 
were  the  brief  epitomes  of,  or  disorderly  collections  of  frag- 
ments from,  the  writers  of  the  classical  period.  Such 
works  often  passed  under  the  name  of  some  famous  author 
of  the  previous  period  and  sometimes  are  more  or  less  based 
upon  his  writings.  Most  of  the  works  in  the  field  of  nat- 
ural science  are  of  such  derivative  or  pseudo-authorship :  the 
Medicine  of  the  Pseudo-Pliny,  the  Herbarium  of  the  Pseudo- 
Apuleius,  the  geographical  work  ascribed  to  Aethicus,  the 
Geoponica,  the  treatises  on  herbs  attributed  to  Macer  and 
Dioscorides.  Indeed,  the  whole  textual  history  of  the  lat- 
ter's  De  nmteria  medica  is  so  full  of  vicissitudes  and  un- 
certainties that  I  have  postponed  its  treatment  until  this 
chapter.  The  names  of  the  actual  compilers  or  abbreviators 
of  these  works  are  usually  unknown  and  it  is  also  usually 
impossible  to  date  them   with  any  approach  to  accuracy. 

594 


CHAP.  XXVI     PSEUDO-LITERATURE  IN  SCIENCE  595 

Roughly  speaking  of  them  as  a  whole,  they  may  be  said  to 
have  gradually  taken  on  their  present  form  at  almost  any 
time  between  the  third  and  tenth  centuries.  In  the  case  of 
these  works  of  natural  science  at  least,  it  is  not  quite  fair 
to  class  them  all  as  brief  epitomes  or  disorderly  collections. 
In  some  we  see  an  obvious  attempt  to  rearrange  the  old 
materials  in  a  form  more  convenient  for  present  use.  In 
others  to  the  stage  of  abbreviation  from  ancient  authors  has 
succeeded  another  stage  of  later  additions  from  other 
sources. 

The  Medicina,  or  Art  of  Medicine,  of  the  Pseudo-Pliny  ^  Medicine 
consists  of  three  books  in  which  medical  passages,  drawn  °'  ^^^' 
from  Pliny's  Natural  History,  are  rearranged  according  to 
diseases  instead  of,  as  in  the  genuine  Pliny,  by  simples.  The 
first  two  books  deal  with  diseases  of  the  human  body  in 
descending  order  from  top  to  toe  and  from  headache  to 
gout,  a  favorite  arrangement  throughout  the  course  of 
medieval  medicine.  The  last  book  then  considers  afflictions 
which  are  not  necessarily  connected  with  any  particular  part 
of  the  body,  such  as  wounds  and  fevers.  Thus  this  com- 
pilation attests  Pliny's  medieval  influence  and  the  practical 
use  made  of  his  work,  while  it  of  course  continues  much 
of  his  medical  magic  and  superstition.  The  compiler's  re- 
arrangement is  an  essential  one,  if  the  medical  recommenda- 
tions of  the  Natural  History  were  to  be  made  available  for 
ready  reference.  In  this  case,  therefore,  the  epitomizer  has 
rather  improved  upon  than  disordered  the  arrangement  of 
the  original.  This  compilation  is  believed  to  have  been  used 
by  Marcellus  Empiricus,  and  a  Letter  of  Pliniiis  Secundus 
to  his  friends  about  medicine,  which  Marcellus  gives  along 
with  other  medical  epistles,  is  thought  to  be  the  preface  of 
the  abbreviator,  who  in  that  case  depicts  himself  as  com- 
posing his  volume  so  that  his  friends  and  himself  when 
traveling  may  avoid  the  payment  of  exorbitant  fees  asked 
by  strange  physicians.     If  we  can  regard  everything  in  the 

*  PKnii  Secundi  lunioris  de  me-      Medicina      Plinii,"     in     Hermes, 
dicina  lihri  ires,  ed.  V.  Rose,  I«ip-      VIII    (1874)    19-66. 
siae,   1875.     V.  Rose,  "Ueber  die 


596  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

work  of  Marcellus  as  we  have  it  as  having  been  written  by 
400,  the  Medicine  of  Pliny  must  have  been  written  during 
the  declining  Roman  Empire.  The  manuscripts  used  by 
Rose  in  his  edition  were  of  the  tenth  and  twelfth  centuries. 
There  is  also  a  later  version  of  the  Medicine  of  Pliny  in 
five  books/  of  which  the  two  last  are  entirely  new  additions, 
the  fifth  being  an  extract  from  the  old  Latin  translation  of 
Alexander  of  Tralles.  And  in  the  first  three  books  the 
earlier  Pseudo-Pliny  has  been  worked  over  with  additions. 
The  Pseudo-Pliny  is  also  embodied  with  alterations  and 
accompanied  by  some  prayers  and  incantations  in  a  tenth 
century  manuscript  at  St.  Gall.^ 
The  Her-  Several  works  besides  the  six  commonly  regarded  as 

Apuleius.  genuine  ^  were  attributed  to  Apuleius  in  the  middle  ages, 
grammatical  *  and  rhetorical  ^  treatises,  the  Hermetic 
Asclepius,^  a  treatise  on  physiognomy,"^  and  the  very 
widespread  Sphere  of  Life  and  Death,  of  which  we  shall 
treat  in  another  chapter.^  We  shall  now  consider  the 
Herbarium  of  Apuleius,^  the  one  of  his  spurious  works, 
which  has  most  to  do  with  the  world  of  nature,  and,  with 
the  exception  of  the  brief  Sphere,  the  one  which  occurs 
most  often  in  the  manuscripts.  The  Herbarium  was  first 
printed  about   1480  by  the  physician  of  Pope  Sixtus  IV 

*C.     Plinii    Secundi    Medicina,  ^  See   Schanz    (1905),  139-40, 

ed.   Thomas   Pighinuccius,   Rome,  *  See  below  p.  683.    Schanz  fails 

1509.  to  mention  it  among  the  apocryphal 

^  Codex   St.  Gall  751;  described  works  of   Apuleius. 

by  V.  Rose,  Hermes,  VIII,  48-55 ;  *  H.  Kobert,  De  Pseudo-Apulei 

Anecdota  II,  106.  herbarum      medicaminibus,     Bay- 

^  For  the  list  of  his  six  genuine  reuth,    1888.     Schanz    (1905)    138, 

works  see  above  p.  222.  mentions    only    continental    MSS, 

*  De  nota  aspirationis  and  De  although  there  are  numerous  MSS 
diphthongis,  ed.  Osann,  Darm-  of  it  in  the  British  Museum  and 
stadt,  1826,  with  De  orthographia,  Bodleian  libraries,  some  of  which 
a  forgery  by  a  sixteenth  century  have  been  used  and  others  de- 
humanist.                        _             _  scribed    by    O.    Cockayne    in    his 

°  neptepyu'7>'«ias,  sometimes  printed  edition  of  the  Herbarium  and  the 

as    the    third    book    of     the    De  other    treatises    accompanying    it 

dogniate  Platonis.    Some  scholars,  in    his    Leechdoms,    Wortcunning, 

however,  regard  it  as  genuine,  and  and  Starcraft   of  Early  England, 

there   are  a  number  of    MSS   of  Vol.    I     (1864)     in    RS    XXXV. 

it  from  the  9th,  loth,  and  nth  cen-  Nor  does  Schanz  note  Cockayne's 

turies.     See  Schanz  (1905),  127-8.  book. 

'  See  above  p.  290. 


XXVI 


PSEUDO-LITERATURE  IN  SCIENCE 


597 


from  a  manuscript  at  Monte  Cassino,  and  then,  after  vari- 
ous other  editions,  was  included  in  1547  in  the  collection 
of  ancient  Latin  medical  writers  issued  by  the  Aldine  Press. 
We  are  told,  however,  that  with  the  close  of  the  fifteenth 
century  the  Apuleius  began  to  be  superseded  by  German 
herbals.  The  medieval  manuscripts  of  the  Herharimn  are 
often  noteworthy  for  their  illuminations  of  the  herbs  in 
vivid  colors.  Those  of  the  mandragora  root  are  especially 
interesting,  showing  it  as  a  man  standing  on  the  back  of 
a  dog  or  a  human  form  with  leaves  growing  on  the  head 
and  led  by  a  dog  chained  to  his  waist, ^  The  oldest  manu- 
scripts are  of  the  sixth  century,  and  there  are  some  in 
Anglo-Saxon,  but  as  one  would  expect,  the  work  underwent 
many  additions  and  alterations,  and  different  manuscripts 
of  it  vary  considerably.  The  author  is  usually  spoken  of 
as  Apuleius  the  Platonist  and  is  sometimes  said  to  have  re- 
ceived his  work  from  the  centaur  Chiron,  the  master  of 
Achilles,  and  from  Esculapius.^ 

In  the  Herbarium  the  plants  are  listed  and  described   Specimens 
and  their  virtues,  especially  medicinal,  stated.     Usually  the   occult 
names  for  each  herb  in  several  languages  or  regions  are   science, 
given — Latin,   Greek,   Punic,   Biblical    (by  the  Prophets), 


^  See  Sloane  1975,  a  vellum  MS 
of  the  I2th  or  early  13th  century 
written  in  fine  large  letters  and 
beautifully  illuminated;  Ashmole 
1431,  end  of  nth  century,  and 
1462,  13th  century,  fol.  45r.  Har- 
leian  4986,  Apuleii  Platonici  de 
medicamentis  cum  figuris  pictis,  is 
another  early  illuminated  English 
MS.  Cockayne  I,  Ixxxii,  does  not 
date  it,  but  the  MSS  catalogue 
lists  it  as  tenth  century.  In  CU 
Trinity  1152,  14th  century,  James 
(III,  162-3)  estimates  the  number 
of  colored  drawings  as  between 
800  and  1000 ;  he  describes  only  a 
few.  Singer  (1921)  reproduces  a 
number  of  such  illuminations 
from  MSS  of  the  Herbarium  and 
of  Dioscorides. 

*  Lucca  236,  9-ioth  centu-ry, 
"Herbarium  Apuleii  Platonici 
quem  accepit  a  Chironi  magistro 


Achillis  et  ab  Escolapio  explicit 
feliciter."  In  Cotton  Vitellius 
C-III,  early  nth  century,  in 
Anglo-Saxon,  although  the  title 
reads,  "The  Herbarium  of  Apu- 
leius the  Platonist  which  he  re- 
ceived from  Esculapius  and  Chi- 
ron the  centaur,  the  master  of 
Achilles,"  a  full  page  painting 
shows  Plato  and  Chiron  receiv- 
ing the  volume  from  Aesculapius 
(Cockayne,  I,  Ixxxviii).  And 
Sloane  1975  and  Harleian  1585 
speak  of  the  Herbarium  as  "Li- 
ber Platonis  Apoliensis."  In  a 
15th  century  MS  (Rawlinson  C- 
328,  fol.  113V-,  Incipit  de  herbis 
Galieni  Apolei  et  Ciceronis)  Ga- 
len and  Cicero,  who  perhaps  re- 
place Chiron  and  Aesculapius, 
are  associated  with  Apuleius  as 
authors. 


598  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

Egyptian,  Syrian,  Gallic,  Dacian,  Spanish,  Phrygian, 
Tuscan.  By  no  means  all  of  these  are  listed  in  every  case, 
however.  The  virtues  of  the  herbs,  often  operate  in  an 
occult  manner,  or  procedure  suggestive  of  magic  is  in- 
volved in  collecting  or  applying  them.  Often  diseases  are 
cured  merely  by  holding  an  herb  in  the  hand,  wearing  it 
with  a  string  about  the  neck,  or  placing  it  behind  one  ear, 
or  wearing  it  in  a  ring.  Lunatics,  for  example,  are  treated 
by  binding  an  herb  about  the  neck  with  red  cloth  when 
the  moon  is  waxing  in  the  sign  of  the  bull  or  the  first  part 
of  the  scorpion.  Not  only  does  observance  of  astrology 
assist  the  medicinal  application  of  herbs;  plants  are  in  turn 
of  assistance  in  the  pursuit  of  astrology.  To  learn  under 
the  rule  of  what  star  you  are,  be  in  a  state  of  purity,  pluck 
the  herb  Montaster,  keep  it  in  a  bit  of  clean  linen  until  you 
find  a  whole  grain  of  wheat  in  a  loaf  of  bread,  then  place 
this  with  the  herb  under  your  pillow  and  pray  to  the  seven 
planets  to  reveal  your  guardian  star  to  you  in  your  sleep. 
Indeed  prayers  and  incantations  are  frequently  employed 
and  in  one  case  must  be  repeated  nine  times.  Sometimes 
the  herb  itself  is  addressed,  as  in  the  conjuration,  "Herb 
Erystion,  I  implore  you  to  aid  me  and  cheerfully  afford 
me  all  your  virtues  and  cure  and  make  whole  all  those  ills 
which  Aesculapius  and  Chiron  the  centaur,  masters  of 
medicine,  healed  by  means  of  you."  Sometimes  the  earth 
is  conjured  as  in  the  prayer  beginning,  "Holy  goddess 
Earth."  Such  prayers  are  scarcely  consonant  with  Chris- 
tianity and  in  some  manuscripts  have  been  omitted  and  re- 
placed by  the  Lord's  Prayer  or  other  Christian  forms,  or 
left  in  with  their  wording  shghtly  ahered  to  avoid  pagan- 
ism.^     Personal  purity  and  clean   clothing  are   often  en- 

*Daremberg  (1853),  11-12,  said  century  hand  has  added  a  pas- 
that  the  pagan  incantations  were  sage  in  Latin  which  may  be  trans- 
preserved  intact  in  a  number  of  lated :  "In  the  name  of  Christ, 
MSS  at  Oxford  and  Cambridge.  Amen.  I  conjure  you,  herb,  that 
Conjurations  of  herbs  are  not  lim-  I  may  conquer  by  lord  Peter  etc. 
ited  to  the  Pseudo-Apuleius  in  by  moon  and  stars  etc.  and  may 
medieval  MSS  but  sometimes  oc-  you  conquer  all  my  enemies,  pon- 
cur  singly  as  in  Perugia  736,  13th  tiff  and  priests  and  all  layrncn 
century,  where  at  fol.  267  a  14th  and    all    women   and    all    lawyers 


XXVI 


PSEUDO-LITERATURE  IN  SCIENCE 


599 


joined  upon  those  gathering  the  herbs  and  such  instruc- 
tions are  added  as  to  mark  the  circle  about  the  plant  with 
gold,  silver,  ivory,  the  tooth  of  a  wild  boar,  and  the  horn 
of  a  bull,  or  to  fill  the  hole  with  honeyed  fruits.  Some 
herbs  protect  their  bearers  from  all  serpents  or  even  from 
all  evils.  Others,  like  asparagus  if  you  use  a  dry  root  of  it 
to  sprinkle  the  patient  with  spring  water,  break  the  spell  of 
witchcraft.  Asparagus  is  also  beneficial  for  toothache  and 
wonderfully  relieves  a  tumor  or  bladder  trouble,  if  it  is 
boiled  in  water  and  drunk  by  the  patient  fasting  for  seven 
days  and  also  used  in  bathing  for  a  number  of  days.  But 
one  must  be  careful  not  to  go  out  in  the  cold  during  this 
time  nor  to  take  cold  drinks.^ 

In  some  manuscripts  a  "Precantation  of  all  herbs"  is 
placed  at  the  beginning  of  the  treatise.^  It  prescribes  such 
procedure  as  holding  a  mirror  over  the  herb  before  plucking 
it  before  sunrise  under  a  waning  moon.  The  person  pluck- 
ing the  herb  and  uttering  the  incantation  must  be  barefoot, 
ungirded,  chaste,  and  wear  no  ring.  The  plant  is  adjured 
not  only  "by  the  living  God"  and  "the  holy  name  of  God, 
Sabaoth,"  but  also  by  Seia,  the  Roman  goddess  of  sowing, 
and  by  "GS,"  which  presumably  stands  for  Gaia  Seia,  an 
expression  which  is  once  written  out  in  full.  Some  mean- 
ingless words  are  also  repeated. 

The  Herbarium  is  often  accompanied  in  the  manu- 
scripts by  other  treatises  on  herbs  ascribed  to  Dioscorides 
and  Macer,  of  which  we  shall  speak  presently;  by  a  work 
on  the  medicinal  properties  of  animals,  or  more  particularly 
of  quadrupeds,  by  Sextus  Papirius  Placidus  ^  Actor  * — an 


who  are  against  me  etc."  In 
Sloane  1571,  15th  century,  fols. 
1-6,  at  the  close  of  fragments  of 
a  Latin-English  dictionary  of 
herbs  is  a  Latin  prayer  entitled, 
Benedictio   omnium  herbarum. 

*  The  above  passages  are  from 
Sloane  1975  and  the  edition  of 
1547. 

'Ashmole  1431,  nth  century, 
fol.  3r,  "In  nomine  domini  incipit 
herboralium  apuleii  platonis  quod 


accepit  ascolapio  et  chirone  cen- 
tauro  magistro.  Lege  feliciter. 
Precantatio  omnium  herbarum  ad 
singulas  curas."  CU  Trinity  1152, 
14th  century,  fol.  i.  Gonville  and 
Caius  345,   14th  century,  fol.  Sgv. 

'  Or  Papyriensis  Placitus. 

*  Perhaps  merely  for  "auctor." 
ed.  Fabricius,  Bibl.  Graec.  XIII, 
395-423,  Sexti  Placiti  liber  de  me- 
dicina  ex  animalibus. 


A  "Pre- 
cantation 
of  All 
Herbs." 


Other 
treatises 
accom- 
panying 
the  Her' 
barium. 


6oo 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Cosmog- 
raphy of 
Aethicus. 


Otherwise  quite  unknown  personage ;  ^  by  a  "letter  concern- 
ing a  little  beast"  from  the  king  of  Egypt  or  Aesculapius  to 
the  emperor  Octavian  Augustus ;  "  and  by  introductory  let- 
ters, such  as  we  find  prefaced  to  the  De  medicamentis  of 
Marcellus  Empiricus,  of  "Hippocrates  to  his  Moecenas"  ^ 
and  "Antonius  Musus  to  Moecenas  Agrippa."  The  epistle 
of  the  Egyptian  king  or  Aesculapius  to  Augustus,  however, 
really  forms  the  introduction  or  opening  chapter  to  the 
treatise  of  Sextus  Papirius  Placidus  on  the  medicinal  prop- 
erties of  animals,  and  after  the  little  beast  or  quadruped 
called  mela  or  taxo  *  follow  fast  the  stag,  serpent,  fox,  hare, 
scorpion,  and  so  forth.  As  for  the  taxo,  Augustus  is  told 
that  by  means  of  it  he  can  protect  himself  from  sorcerers, 
avoid  defections  in  his  army,  and  preserve  his  troops  from 
the  pestilence  which  the  barbarians  bring,  and  the  city  of 
Rome  from  both  pestilences  and  fires.  To  this  end  a  lus- 
tration should  be  performed  with  its  flesh,  and  it  should 
then  be  buried  at  the  city  gates.  One  way  to  appropriate 
its  virtue  is  to  extract  its  large  teeth,  repeating  a  jargon  of 
strange  words  the  while. 

Another  characteristic  product  of  declining  antique 
learning  and  of  early  medieval  effort  is  found  in  the  field 
of  geography  in  the  Cosmography  of  Aethicus  Istricus, 
translated  into  Latin  by  the  priest  Jerome  (Hieronymus 
Presbyter).     The  oldest  manuscript  is  one  of  the  eighth 


^In  Montpellier  277,  15th  cen- 
tury, "Liber  Sesti  platonis  de  ani- 
malibus,"  perhaps  because  the 
Apuleius  of  the  Herbarium  is 
called  a  Platonist.  In  Digby  43, 
late  14th  century,  fol.  15,  "Liber 
Septiplanti  Papiensis  de  bestiis 
et  avibus  medicinalis."  In  Raw- 
linson  C-328,  15th  century,  fol. 
128,  "Incipit  liber  Papiriensis  ex 
animalibus  ex  avibus."  The  work 
is  sometimes  found  in  juxtaposi- 
tion with  a  somewhat  similar 
"Liber  medicinalis  de  secretis  Ga- 
lieni,"  concerning  which  see  below, 
chapter  64,  II,  761. 

'V.  Rose  (187s)  337-8  suggests 
that    this    is    a    fragment    from   a 


fuller  work  of  Aesculapius  to 
Augustus  cited  by  Thomas  of  Can- 
timpre,  Albertus  Magnus,  and 
Vincent  of  Beauvais.  See  also 
Peter  of  Abano,  De  venenis,  cap. 
5,  "in  epistola  Esculapii  philosophi 
ad  Octavianum."  But  perhaps 
these  writers  refer  to  the  entire 
work   of    Sextus    Papirius. 

'  Ed.  Ruellius,  with  Scribonius 
Largus,  Paris,   1529. 

*  In  a  later  medieval  vocabulary 
taxus  is  given  as  a  synonym  for 
the  animal  called  camaleon:  Al- 
phita,  ed.  Daremberg  from  BN 
6954  and  6957  in  De  Renzi,  Col- 
lectio  Salernitana,  III,  272-322. 


XXVI  PSEUDO-LITERATURE  IN  SCIENCE  6oi 

century  in  the  British  Museum/  where  it  is  also  found  in 
several  other  fairly  early  manuscripts  ^  in  the  respectable 
company  of  Vitruvius,  Vegetius,  Sallust,  and  Suetonius,* 
as  well  as  with  the  more  congenial  work  of  Solinus.  This 
Cosmographia  was  not  printed  until  1852,  when  it  was  ed- 
ited at  Paris  by  M.  d'Avezac  and  again  in  1854  at  Leipzig 
by  M.  H.  Wuttke.  It  is  an  entirely  different  work  from 
what  had  hitherto  been  repeatedly  printed  as  the  Cosmog- 
raphy of  Aethicus  but  is  really  to  be  identified  with  frag- 
ments of  Julian  Honorius  and  Orosius.  The  Latin  trans- 
lator of  our  treatise  had  been  identified  in  the  middle  ages 
with  St.  Jerome,  the  church  father,  and  Wuttke  still  as- 
cribed it  to  him,  but  Bunbury  protested  against  this,^  and 
Mommsen  placed  our  treatise  not  earlier  than  the  seventh 
century.^ 

Bunbury  added,  however,  that  the  Cosmography  "ap-  Its 
pears  to  have  been  much  read  in  the  middle  ages,  and  is  influence 
therefore  not  without  literary  interest."  The  apparent 
greatness  of  the  names  on  the  title  page  seems  to  have  given 
the  middle  ages  an  exaggerated  notion  of  the  work's  im- 
portance. Aethicus  himself  is  spoken  of  as  from  Istria  and 
according  to  the  Explicit  of  at  least  one  manuscript  ®  was  a 
Scythian,  but  this  does  not  mean  that  his  attitude  towards 
learning  was  that  of  a  Hun,  for  the  same  Explicit  goes  on 
to  inform  us  that  he  was  of  noble  lineage  and,  if  I  correctly 

*  Cotton  Vespasian  B,  X,  #6.  M.  Wuttke  can  attach  any  value 

*  Harleian  3859,  called  tenth  to  such  a  production  is  to  me  quite 
century  in  the  Harleian  catalogue  incomprehensible ;  still  more  that 
which  is  often  incorrect  in  its  he  should  ascribe  the  translation 
dating,  but  nth  or  12th  century  to  the  great  ecclesiastical  writer," 
by  d'Avezac,  Mommsen  in  his  Jerome.  Bunbury  believed  that 
edition  of  Solinus,  and  Beazley,  the  work  was  not  earlier  than  the 
Dawn  of  Geography,  I,  523.  seventh  century.  Beazley,  Daivn 
Royal  15-B-II  and  15-C-IV,  both  of  Geography,  I,  355-63,  is  of  the 
of    the    I2th    century.     For   other  same   opinion. 

MSS  at  Paris,  Leyden,  and  Rome  ^  In    his    edition    of    Solinus,    p. 

see  Beazley,  op.  cit.  xxvii,    he    contends    that    certain 

*  But  after  all  is  Suetonius  any  passages  which  Wuttke  pointed 
more  respectable  a  historian  than  out  as  common  to  Aethicus  and 
Aethicus  and  Solinus  are  geog-  Solinus  are  borrowed  by  Aethicus 
raphers?  from  Isidore  who  died  in  636. 

■*  Bunbury,    History   of   Ancient  °  Harleian  3859. 

Geography,  II,  Appendix  :     "How 


602 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Character 
of  the 
work. 


Its  atti- 
tude to 
marvels. 


interpret  the  faulty  syntax  of  its  Latin,  that  from  him  the 
ethical  philosophy  of  other  sages  drew  its  origins.  Some- 
what later  Roger  Bacon  said  in  discussing  faults  in  the  study 
of  theology  in  his  day,  "From  the  authorities  of  the  philoso- 
phers whom  the  saints  cite  I  shall  abstain,  except  that  I  will 
strengthen  the  utterances  of  Ethicus  the  astronomer  and 
Alchimus  the  philosopher  by  the  authority  of  the  blessed 
Jerome,  since  no  one  could  credit  that  they  had  said  so  many 
marvelous  things  about  Christ  and  the  angels  and  demons 
and  men  who  are  to  be  glorified  or  damned  unless  Jerome 
or  some  other  saint  proved  that  they  had  said  so."  ^ 

As  Bacon's  words  indicate,  Christian  influence  is  mani- 
fest in  the  Cosmography,  although,  as  they  also  indicate, 
the  original  Aethicus  is  not  supposed  to  have  been  a  Chris- 
tian, but,  as  one  manuscript  informs  us,  an  Academic  phi- 
losopher.^  Oriental  influence,  too,  is  perhaps  shown  in  flights 
of  poetical  language  and  unrestrained  imagination,  in  a 
number  of  allusions  to  Alexander  the  Great,  and  in  an  ex- 
traordinary ignorance  of  early  Roman  history  which  leads 
the  author  to  tell  how  Romulus  invaded  Pannonia  and  fought 
against  the  Lacedaemonians.  "How  great  carnage,"  he 
exclaims,  "in  Lacedaemonia,  Noricum  and  Pannonia,  Istria 
and  Albania,  northern  regions  near  my  home,  first  at  the 
hands  of  the  Romans  and  the  tyrant  Numitor,  then  under 
the  brothers  Romulus  and  Remus,  and  later  under  the  first 
Tarquin,  the  Proud."  The  author  eulogizes  Athens  as  well 
as  Alexander,  and  mentions  a  people  called  Turchi,  but 
whether  or  not  he  has  Turks  in  mind  would  be  hard  to  say. 

As  we  have  it,  the  Cosmography  cites  both  the  Ethicus 
and  the  Alchimus  to  whom  Roger  Bacon  referred.  Indeed, 
our  treatise  does  not  pretend  to  be  the  original  work  of  Ae- 


*  Steele,  Opera  hactenus  inedita, 
1905,  Fasc.  I,  pp.  1-2. 

*CUL  213,  14th  century,  fols. 
IO3V-14,  "Qui  hunc  librum  legit 
intelligat  Ethicum  philosophum 
non  omnia  dixisse  que  hie  scrip- 
ta  sunt,  set  Solinus  (so  James,  but 
Jeronimus  in  d'Avezac,  p.  237)  qui 


eum  transtulit  sententias  veritati 
consonas  ex  libro  eiusdem  ex- 
cerpsit  et  easdem  testimonias 
scripture  nostre  confirmavit.  Non 
enim  erat  iste  philosophus  Chris- 
tianus  sed  Ethnicus»et  professions 
Achademicus." 


XXVI  PSEUDO-LITERATURE  IN  SCIENCE  603 

thicus,  which  it  repeatedly  cites,  but  is  apparently  the  work 
of  some  epitomizer  or  abbreviator  who  intersperses  remarks 
and  comments  of  his  own,  and,  according  to  one  manuscript, 
makes  the  statements  of  Aethicus  conform  to  Christian 
Scripture.  From  the  volumes  of  the  original  work  he  makes 
only  a  few  excerpts,  professing  to  omit  what  is  unheard  of 
or  unknown  or  seems  too  formidable,  and  including  only 
with  hesitancy  a  few  bits  concerning  unknown  races  on  the 
testimony  of  hearsay.  The  enigmas  of  Aethicus  and  other 
philosophers  often  give  our  abbreviator  pause,  and  he  re- 
gards as  incredible  the  story  of  Aethicus  that  the  Amazons 
nurse  young  minotaurs  and  centaurs  who  fight  for  them  in 
return.  Aethicus  also  tells  of  the  wonderful  armor  of  the 
Amazons  which  they  treat  with  bitumen  and  the  blood  of 
their  own  offspring.  In  Crete  Aethicus  found  herbs  un- 
known in  other  lands  which  ward  off  famine.  Very  beau- 
tiful gems  are  mentioned,  including  those  extracted  from 
the  brains  of  immense  dragons  and  basilisks,  but  little  is  said 
of  their  virtues,  occult  or  otherwise.  Indeed,  the  amount 
either  of  specific  information  or  specific  misinformation  in 
the  book  is  very  scanty.  It  deals  largely  in  uncouth  rhet- 
oric, glittering  generalities,  and  obscure  allusion  anent  the 
wanderings  of  Aethicus  over  the  face  of  the  earth  and  the 
strange  marvels  which  he  encountered  in  distant  lands.  He 
is  described  as  well  versed  in  astrology  and  as  reproving 
the  astrologers  of  Scythia(  ?)  and  Mantua (  ?),  and  one  pas- 
sage vaguely  speaks  of  the  stars  as  signs  of  the  present  and 
future;  but  otherwise  the  abbreviator  gives  little  evidence 
of  knowledge  of  the  subject,  although  Roger  Bacon  ^  cited 
Ethicus  Astronomiciis  in  Cosmographia  as  one  of  his  au- 
thorities when  discussing  the  question  of  Jesus  Christ's 
nativity  and  its  relation  to  the  stars,  and  although  Pico  della 
Mirandola  ranked  the  Cosmography  as  one  of  the  most  ab- 
surd of  astrological  works. ^  As  for  magic,  in  one  passage 
malefici  and  magi  are  censured  along  with  idolaters,  and  the 

*  Bridges  I,  267-8.  *  Cited  by  d'Avezac,  pp.  257  and  267. 


6o4 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


The  Geo- 
Ponica. 


Magic  and 

astrology 

therein. 


author  presently  speaks  of  vain  characters  and  supersti- 
tious doctrines.  But  elsewhere  a  magician  {Pirronius 
magus)  is  named  as  the  inventor  of  ships  and  discoverer  of 
purple.  On  the  whole,  in  its  loose  and  hazy  way  the  Cos- 
mography not  only  is  romantic  and  religious  enough  to  ap- 
peal to  medieval  readers,  it  also  is  of  a  character  to  offer  en- 
couragement, if  not  data,  to  a  later  and  more  detailed  in- 
terest in  alchemy,  occult  virtues,  astrology,  and  magic. 

Upon  the  subject  of  agriculture  in  the  early  middle  ages 
we  have  the  collection  known  as  the  Geoponica.  It  properly 
belongs  to  Byzantine  literature  and  perhaps  had  little  direct 
influence  upon  western  Europe.  Nevertheless  at  least  a  por- 
tion of  it  upon  vineyards  was  translated  into  Latin  by  Bur- 
gundio  of  Pisa  in  the  twelfth  century.^  In  any  case  as  the 
"only  formal  treatise  on  Greek  agriculture"  extant  it  is  a 
rather  important  historical  source;  it  also  is  a  good  speci- 
men of  early  medieval  compilations  from  classical  works; 
and  in  its  inclusion  of  superstitious  and  magical  details  it 
is  probably  roughly  representative  of  the  period,  whether 
in  east  or  west.  In  the  form  which  we  now  possess  it  was 
published  about  950  A.  D.  and  dedicated  to  the  Byzantine 
emperor,  Constantine  VII  or  Porphyrygennetos.  But  this 
issue  was  perhaps  little  more  than  an  abbreviated  revision 
of  the  work  of  Cassianus  Bassus  of  the  sixth  century,  whose 
introductory  words  to  his  son  are  still  given  at  the  begin- 
ning of  the  seventh  book.  Cassianus  is  believed  in  his  turn 
to  have  been  especially  indebted  to  two  fourth  century 
writers,  Vindanius  Anatolius  of  Beirut,  whose  agricultural 
teaching  was  of  a  sober  and  rational  sort,  and  Didymus  of 
Alexandria,  who  was  more  given  to  superstition  and  magic.^ 

Nevertheless,  magic  and  astrology  find  no  place  in  the 
index  to  the  most  recent  edition  of  the  work.^  A  survey, 
however,  of  the  text  itself  reveals  some  indications  of  the 

'Vienna  2272,  i^ih.  century,  fol.  siani  Bassi  scholastici  de  re  rus- 

92,    De   vindemiis   a    Burgundione  tica     eclogae,     Lipsiae,     Teubner, 

translatus :   Pars  Geoponicorum.  1895.    PW  criticizes  this  edition  as 

^  Such  is  the  view  set  forth  in  "Icidcr     vollig     verfehlten."       Its 

PW  Geoponica.  preface   lists  the  earlier   editions. 

'  H.  Beckh,  Geoponica  sive  Cas- 


XXVI  PSEUDO-LITERATURE  IN  SCIENCE  605 

presence  of  both.  The  very  first  of  its  twenty  books  deals 
v^ith  astrological  prediction  of  the  w^eather  and  cites  some 
spurious  w^ork  or  works  by  Zoroaster  a  great  deal.  In  later 
books,  too,  Zoroaster  is  sometimes  cited  for  semi-astrologi- 
cal advice,  such  as  guarding  wine  jars  against  sun  or  moon- 
beams when  opening  them,  or  testing  seed  by  exposing  it  to 
the  rays  of  the  dog-star.^  Zoroaster  is  also  used  as  an  au- 
thority on  the  sympathy  and  antipathy  existing  between 
natural  objects.  ^  Damigeron  and  Democritus  are  other 
names  cited  which  are  suggestive  of  the  occult  and  magical.^ 
There  are  not,  however,  many  cases  of  extreme  superstition 
in  the  Geoponica.  Something  is  said  of  the  marvelous  prop- 
erties of  gems,  of  the  effect  of  a  hyena's  shadow  falling  upon 
a  dog  by  moonlight,  and  how  dogs  will  not  attack  a  person 
who  holds  a  hyena's  tongue  in  his  hand.^  Incantations  of  a 
sort  are  occasionally  recommended.^  To  keep  wine  from 
turning  sour  one  is  directed  to  write  the  divine  words, 
"Taste  and  see  that  the  Lord  is  good"  upon  the  wine-jar.^ 
Another  passage  advises  a  person  who  finds  himself  in 
a  place  full  of  fleas  to  cry,  "Ouch !  Ouch !"  and  then  they  will 
not  bite  him.'^ 

Perhaps  the  chief  ancient  work  on  pharmacology  was  Dioscor- 
the  De  materia  medica  or  Ilept  vkq^  iaTpLKrjs  of  Pedanius  ^  ^^* 
Dioscorides  of  Anazarba.  Galen,  as  we  have  seen,  found 
things  to  criticize  in  it  but  nevertheless  made  great  use  of 
it  in  his  own  work  on  medicinal  simples.  Dioscorides  of 
course  had  his  previous  sources  but  seems  to  have  surpassed 
them  in  fulness  and  orderliness  of  arrangement.  Of  the 
man  himself  his  preface  tells  us  all  that  we  know,  and  his 
dedication  shows  that  he  probably  wrote  during  the  reign 
of  Nero.  He  was  born  in  Cilicia  near  Tarsus,  he  had  trav- 
eled in  many  lands  as  a  soldier,  and  his  work  was  based 

^Geoponica,  VII,  5;  II,  15.  zig,  1893,  pp.  463-576,  drew  from 

'VII,  11;  XV,  I.  the  Geoponica  13  out  of  his  total 

'I,  12;  VII,  13;  etc.  of    24s    instances    of    incantations 

*  XV,  I.  from  Greek  and  Latin  literature. 

"  R.  Heim,  Incantamenta  magica  "  VII,  14. 

graeca   latina,   in   Jahrb.  f.   class.  '  XIII,  15. 

Philologie,    Suppl.    Bd.    19,    Leip- 


6o6 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Textual 
history  of 
the  De 
materia 
medico. 


Altera- 
tions 
made  in 
the  Greek 
text. 


partly  upon  personal  observation  and  experience  as  well  as 
previous  books. 

Dioscorides'  influence  continued  and  even  increased  as 
time  went  on;  but  if  future  centuries  were  deeply  influenced 
by  his  book,  it  was  also  seriously  affected  by  them,  for  it 
seems  to  have  been  subjected  to  a  long  series  of  repeated 
abbreviations  and  omissions,  additions  and  interpolations, 
changes  in  form  and  in  order.  Thus  all  sorts  of  versions 
of  what  was  called  Dioscorides  came  into  being,  but  which  in 
some  cases  can  hardly  be  regarded  as  more  than  compila- 
tions from  all  the  favorite  pharmacies  of  the  time,  in  which 
the  genuine  Dioscorides  constituted  but  a  remnant  or  a  core. 
Thus  most  early  printed  editions  of  what  purports  to  be  the 
De  materia  medica  must  be  handled  with  great  caution,  and 
it  may  perhaps  be  doubted  if  even  the  latest  effort  of  Max 
Wellmann  to  recover  the  original  Greek  text  has  been  en- 
tirely successful.^  Of  the  five  books  regarded  as  genuine 
and  original  the  first  dealt  with  spices,  salves,  and  oils ;  the 
second,  with  parts  of  animals  and  animal  products  like  milk 
and  honey,  with  grains,  vegetables,  and  pot-herbs.  Other 
plants  and  roots  were  considered  in  the  third  and  fourth 
books,  while  the  last  dealt  with  wines  and  minerals.^ 

Whether  we  now  possess  Dioscorides'  original  text  or 
not,  at  any  rate  the  oldest  Greek  manuscripts  do  not  contain 
it,  but  only  that  portion  dealing  with  herbs.  Moreover,  this 
has  been  rearranged  in  alphabetical  order  and  has  been 
adapted  to  fit  a  set  of  pictures  of  plants  which  were  perhaps 
taken  over  from  the  work  of  Crateuas,  one  of  Dioscorides' 
chief  sources.  Such  is  the  famous  early  sixth  century  il- 
luminated manuscript  made  for  Juliana  Anicia,  daughter  of 
the  emperor  Olybrius  (472  A.  D.)  and  wife  of  the  consul 


*The  first  two  volumes,  pub- 
lished at  Berlin  in  1907,  1906,  cov- 
ered the  first  four  of  the  five  genu- 
ine books.  A  previous  attempt 
was  K.  Sprengel's  edition  in  vols. 
25-26  of  C.  J.  Kiihn's  Medici 
Graeci,  Leipzig,  1829.  On  the  tex- 
tual   history    and    jprohlems     see 


further  Wellman's  articles : 
"Dioskurides"  in  Pauly-Wissowa, 
and  in  Hermes,  XXXIII,  (1898) 
36off. 

'  Jl(pl  ^oravcbv,  rrepl  fo"^''  iravTolosv, 
irtpl  iravToicov  eXalcou,  Trepl  v\i}s  Sep- 
8poov,  irepl  o'lvuv  Kal  'KWcav,  is  another 
order  suggested. 


XXVI 


PSEUDO-LITERATURE  IN  SCIENCE 


607 


Areobindus  (about  512  A.  D.).^  The  alphabetical  re- 
arrangement of  the  Greek  text  of  Dioscorides  was  made  at 
some  time  between  Galen  and  Oribasius,  who  cites  from  it 
in  the  fourth  century.  Not  only  were  the  five  books  of  the 
genuine  De  materia  niedica  interpolated,  but  additional 
spurious  books  were  added  "On  Harmful  Drugs"  and  "On 
Poisons."  ^  The  work  on  medicinal  simples  attributed  to 
Dioscorides  is  extant  in  no  manuscript  earlier  than  the  four- 
teenth century  and  some  versions  of  it  are  much  more  inter- 
polated than  others.  As  Galen  does  not  cite  it  while  Ori- 
basius and  Aetius  do  use  it,  it  is  assumed  that  it  was  com- 


*The  MS  is  said  by  Singer 
(1921)  60,  to  have  now  been 
removed  from  Vienna  to  St. 
Mark's  Library  at  Venice;  it 
was  procured  from  Constantinople 
in  155s  for  the  future  Emperor 
MaximiHan  II  (1564-1576).  A 
photographic  copy  was  published 
in  1906  in  the  Leiden  Collection, 
Codices  Graeci  et  Latini,  by  A.  W. 
Sijthoff,  with  an  introduction  by 
A.  von  Premerstein,  C.  Wessely, 
and  J.  Mantuani  (C.  Wessely, 
Codex  Anciae  lulianae,  etc.,  1906). 
See  also  A.  v.  Premerstein  in  the 
Austrian  Jahrbuch  (1903)  XXIV, 
I05ff. 

I  have  examined  the  fac-simile 
of  this  MS  and  found  the  large 
but  faded  and  partially  obliterated 
illuminations  which  precede  the 
text  rather  disappointing  after 
having  read  the  description  of 
them  in  Dalton's  Byzantine  Art, 
(1911)  460-61,  which,  however, 
I  presume  is  accurate  and  so  re- 
produce here.  These  large  illumi- 
nations include  a  portrait  of  Ju- 
liana Anicia,  an  ornamental  pea- 
cock with  tail  spread,  groups  of 
doctors  engaged  in  medical  dis- 
cussions, and  Dioscorides  himself 
seated  writing,  and  again  seated 
on  a  folding  stool  receiving  the 
herb  marvdragora  (which,  of 
course,  was  a  medieval  favorite) 
from  a  female  figure  personify- 
ing Discovery  (Euprjcris),  "while  in 
the  foreground  a  dog  dies  in 
agony,"     presumably     from     the 


fatal  efifects  of  the  herb.  There 
are  rough  reproductions  of  this 
last  picture  in  Woltmann  and 
Woermann,  History  of  Painting, 
I,  192-3,  and  Singer  (1921)  ,62. 
When  the  text  proper  begins  the 
illuminations  are  confined  to 
medicinal  plants. 

Other  early  Greek  manuscripts 
are  the  Codex  Neapolitanns,  for- 
merly at  Vienna,  now  at  St. 
Mark's,  Venice,  an  eighth  cen- 
tury palimpsest  from  Bobbio,  and 
a  Paris  codex,  (BN  Greek  2179) 
of  the  ninth  century.  An  Arabic 
translation  from  the  Greek  seems 
to  have  been  made  about  850;  a 
century  later  the  Byzantine  em- 
peror sent  a  Greek  manuscript  of 
Dioscorides  to  the  caliph  in  Spain. 

For  the  full  text  of  the  De  ma- 
teria medica  we  are  dependent  on 
MSS  of  the  nth,  12th,  13th  and 
later   centuries. 

^Ilepi  drjXrjTTipLwP  <f>apfiaKuv  and 
irepl  io^b\oiv,  edited  by  Sprengel 
in  Kiihn  (1830),  XXVI,  as  was 
the  TLtpi  e\nropl(TTO)v  air\€iv  re  /cat  avv- 
6eT(x)V  (jjapfxaKuv.  The  Ilepi  4>app.aKCi3V 
i/jLireipias.  ("Experimental  Phar- 
macy"), of  which  a  Latin  version, 
Alpliabctum  empiricum,  sive  Dios- 
coridis  et  Stcphani  AtLeniensis 
.  .  .  de  remediis  expertis,  was 
edited  by  C.  Wolf,  Zurich,  1581,  is 
an  alphabetical  arrangement  by 
diseases  ascribed  to  Dioscorides 
and  Stephen  of  Athens  (and  other 
writers). 


6o8 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Dioscor- 
ides  little 
known  to 
Latins  be- 
fore the 
middle 
ages. 


Partial 
versions 
in  Latin. 


posed  in  the  third  or  early  fourth  century  with  a  forged  ded- 
ication to  a  contemporary  of  Dioscorides,  but  that  it  made 
considerable  use  of  the  genuine  Dioscorides,  to  which  it  bore 
much  the  same  relation  as  the  Medicina  Plinii  did  to  the 
Historia  Naturalis.  Later,  however,  some  Byzantine  com- 
piler of  the  eleventh,  twelfth,  or  thirteenth  century  intro- 
duced a  great  deal  of  new  material  from  Galen's  genuine 
and  spurious  works  in  that  field  and  from  John  of  Damas- 
cus.^ 

What  more  especially  concern  us  are  the  medieval  Latin 
versions  of  Dioscorides.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  although  the 
De  materia  medica  was  from  the  start  highly  regarded  and 
widely  used  by  Greek  physicians,  it  seems  to  have  been  lit- 
tle known  to  Latin  writers  until  the  verge  of  the  medieval 
period.  Gargilius  Martialis,  a  Roman  writer  on  agricul- 
ture in  the  third  century  of  our  era,  was  the  only  old  Latin 
author  to  cite  Dioscorides,  which  he  did,  however,  no  less 
than  eighteen  times  in  his  Medicinae  ex  olerihiis  et  pomis. 
This  has  led  to  the  suggestion  that  he  was  perhaps  responsi- 
ble for  the  first  Latin  translation  or  version  of  Dioscorides ; 
but  it  seems  unlikely  that  the  work  had  been  put  into  Latin 
as  early  as  his  time,  since  it  is  not  cited  again  by  a  Latin 
writer  until  the  sixth  century  and  is  not  used  by  such  medi- 
cal authors  as  Serenus  Sammonicus,  Cassius  Felix,  Theo- 
dorus  Priscianus,  and  Marcellus  Empiricus. 

But  at  least  a  portion  of  Dioscorides  seems  to  have  been 
translated  into  Latin  by  the  time  of  Cassiodorus,  who,  writ- 
ing in  the  first  half  of  the  sixth  century,  states  that  those 
who  cannot  read  Greek  may  consult  the  Herbarium  Diosco- 
ridis.^  This  naturally  suggests  a  version  limited  to  medic- 
inal plants  like  the  early  Greek  text  in  the  manuscript  of 
Juliana  Anicia.  This  impression  is  confirmed  by  the  preface 
to  some  early  Latin  version  of  Dioscorides,  which  Rose  dis- 
covered in  one  of  the  manuscripts  of  the  Herbarium  of 


*  Max  Wellmann,  Die  Schrift 
des  Dioskurides  Uepl  airXchp 
<f>apiJ.6.Kui>,   1914,    and   col.    1140   of 


his  article  "Dioskurides"  in  Pauly- 

Wissowa. 

'^De  inst.  div.  lit.  cap.  31. 


XXVI 


PSEUDO-LITERATURE  IN  SCIENCE 


609 


Apiileius  in  the  British  Museum.^  This  preface  implies  that 
the  translation  which  it  introduced  was  limited  to  the  bo- 
tanical books  of  Dioscorides  and  states  that  it  was  accom- 
panied by  illustrations  of  herbs. 

Based  upon  this  partial  translation  rather  than  identical  De  herbis 
with  it  is  believed  to  have  been  the  De  herbis  femininis,^  jemimms. 
which  was  ascribed  to  Dioscorides  in  the  middle  ages  and 
which  often  accompanies  the  Herbarium  of  the  Pseudo-Apu- 
leius  in  the  manuscripts.  In  this  case  the  herbs  of  the 
Pseudo-Apuleius  are  sometimes  called  masculine,  but  as  a 
matter  of  fact  only  a  minority  of  those  in  the  Pseudo- 
Dioscorides  seem  to  be  distinctly  feminine.  Of  seventy-one 
plants  Kaestner  classed  fifteen  or  sixteen  as  feminine,  while 
in  only  thirty  cases  are  they  prescribed  for  female  com- 
plaints. Rose  dated  this  work  before  Isidore  of  Seville  by 
whom  he  believed  it  was  used.^  It  seems  to  combine  a  free 
Latin  translation  of  excerpts  from  the  genuine  Dioscorides 
with  numerous  additions  from  other  sources. 

Besides  such  abbreviated  and  interpolated  Latin  versions   The  fuller 
or  perversions  of  Dioscorides,  there  was  also  in  existence  in   versions. 
the  early  middle  ages  a  literal  translation  of  all  five  books 


*  V.  Rose  in  Hermes  VIII,  38A. 
Harleian  4986,  fol.  44V,  ".  .  . 
marcelline  libellum  botanicon  ex 
dioscoridis  libris  in  latinum  ser- 
monem  conversum  in  quo  depicte 
sunt  herbarum  figure  ad  te 
misi  .  .  ." 

^  Heinrich  Kaetsner,  Kritisches 
und  Exegctisches  zti  Pseudo- 
Dioskorides  de  herbis  femininis, 
Regensburg,  1896;  text  in  Hermes 
XXXI  (1896)  578-636.  Singer 
(1921)  68,  gives  as  the  earhest 
MS,  Rome  Barberini  IX,  29,  of  9th 
century.  Some  other  MSS  are: 
BN  12995,  9th  century;  Addi- 
tional 8928,  nth  century,  fol.  62V-; 
Ashmole  1431,  end  of  nth  century, 
fols.  31V-43,  "Incipit  liber  Dios- 
coridis ex  herbis  f  eminis" ;  Sloane 
1975,  I2th  or  early  13th  century, 
fols.  49V-73;  Harleian  1585,  12th 
century,  fol.  79- ;  Harleian  5294, 
I2th  century;  Turin  K-IV-3,  12th 


century,  #5,  "Incipit  liber  dios- 
coridis medicine  ex  herbis  femi- 
ninis numero  LXXI  .  .  /  .  .  Liber 
medicine  dioscoridis  de  herbis 
femininis  et  masculinis  explicit 
feliciter." 

In  Vienna  5371,  15th  century, 
fols._i2iv-i24v,  is  a  briefer  Latin 
treatise  ascribed  to  Dioscordes, 
which  begins  with  the  herb  aris- 
tologia  and  mentions  silk  (seri- 
cum)  at  its  close.  I  have  not 
seen  the  MS  but  from  the  title, 
Quid  pro  quo,  and  the  fact  that 
the  writer  dedicates  it  to  his  uncle, 
one  might  fancy  that  it  was  a 
work  written  by  Adelard  of 
Bath's  nephew  in  return  for  the 
Natural  Questions  of  his  uncle. 
(See  below,  chapter  36). 

^Hermes  VIII,  38,  comparing 
Etymologies  XVII,  93,  with  cap. 
30  of  the  De  herbis  femininis. 


6io 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Peter  of 

Abano's 

account 

of  the 

medieval 

versions. 


of  the  De  materia  me  die  a.  It  is  full  of  Latinisms  and  bar- 
barisms but  otherwise  reproduces  the  complete  and  genuine 
Dioscorides,  or  is  supposed  to  do  so.  Rose  and  Wellmann  ^ 
say  that  it  was  current  from  the  sixth  century  on,  and  the 
few  extant  manuscripts  of  it  date  from  the  early  medieval 
period.^  One  reason  for  this  seems  to  be  that  this  literal 
translation  was  replaced  by  another  Latin  version  which  in 
a  Bamberg  manuscript  ^  is  ascribed  to  Constantinus  Afri- 
canus,  the  medical  translator  and  writer  of  the  eleventh  cen- 
tury. In  this  version  the  items  are  arranged  alphabetically, 
and  additions  are  embodied  from  other  sources.  This  ver- 
sion apparently  became  much  better  known  than  the  earlier 
literal  translation  and  has  been  called  "the  most  widely  dis- 
seminated handbook  of  pharmacy  of  the  whole  later  middle 
ages."  *  It  is  stated  by  Rose  to  be  identical  with  the  "Dyas- 
corides,"  upon  which  Peter  of  Abano  lectured  and  com- 
mented about  1300  and  which  was  printed  at  CoUe  in  1478 
and  again  at  Lyons  in  1512.^ 

Peter  of  Abano  tells  us  in  his  preface  ^  that  in  his 
time  there  were  current  two  different  versions,  although 
both  had  the  same  preface.  One  of  these  was  in  five  books 
with  a  great  many  short  chapters,  so  short  in  fact  that  often 
the  treatment  of  a  single  thing  was  scattered  over  several 
chapters.  This  version  was  rare  in  Latin.  The  other  ver- 
sion contained  fewer  but  longer  chapters  with  material  added 
from  Galen,  Pliny,  and  other  writers.     This  version  was 


^  Anecdota  graeca  et  graeco- 
latina,  Berlin,  1864,  II,  115  and 
119;  Hermes  VIII,  38;  Wellmann 
(1906),  p.    xxi. 

*BN  9332,  8th  century;  CLM 
337.  9-ioth  century  from  Monte 
Cassino ;  ed.  T.  M.  Auracher  et 
H.  Stadler,  in  Rom.  Forsch.  I, 
49-105;  X,  181-247  and  368-446; 
XI,  1-121 ;  XII,  161-243. 

«Cod.   Bam.   L-III-9. 

*  PW  "Dioskurides."  A  fairly 
early  MS  is  CU  Jesus  44,  I2-I3th 
century,  fols.  I7-I45r,  "diascorides 
per  modum  alphabeti  de  virtutibus 
herbarum  et  compositione  ole- 
rum."     I  have  not  seen  it  but,  if 


correctly  dated,  it  and  Bologna 
University  Library  378,  12th  cen- 
tury, which  is  said  to  differ  from 
the  printed  editions,  are  too  early 
to  be  Peter  of  Abano's  version. 

^Explicit  dyascorides  quern 
petrus  paduanensis  legendo  co- 
rexit  et  exponendo  quae  utiliora 
sunt  in  luccm  deduxit,  Colle, 
1478.  Dioscorides  digestus  al- 
phabctico  ordine  odditis  annota- 
tiunculis  brevihus  et  tractatu 
aquarum,  Lugduni,  15 12.  And  see 
Chap.  70,  Appendix  II. 

®I  have  read  it  in  BN  6820, 
fol.  ir,  as  well  as  in  the  1478  edi- 
tion. 


XXVI 


PSEUDO-LITERATURE  IN  SCIENCE 


6ii 


arranged  alphabetically.  It  was  this  version  which  Aggre- 
gator ^  had  followed  and  imitated,  but  sometimes  there  were 
chapters  in  either  "Dyascorides"  which  were  missing  in 
Aggregator.  Peter  had  also  seen  an  alphabetical  version  of 
Dioscorides  in  Greek. 

There  seems  also  to  have  been  current,  at  least  in  the 
later  middle  ages,  a  Pseudo-Dioscorides  on  stones,  drawn 
in  part,  like  the  Feminine  Herbs,  from  the  genuine  De  ma- 
teria medica,  whose  discussion  of  the  virtues  of  stones  is 
incredible  enough.^  This  Dioscorides  on  Stones  is  cited  by 
Arnold  of  Saxony  and  Bartholomew  of  England  in  the 
thirteenth  century,  and  portions  at  least  of  the  work  are  ex- 
tant in  manuscripts  at  Erfurt  and  Montpellier.^  A  work 
on  physical  ligatures  is  ascribed  to  Dioscorides  in  a  late 
manuscript,^  but  is  really  a  collection  of  items  from  various 
authors  since  Dioscorides  on  the  marvelous  virtues  of  ani- 
mals, herbs,  and  stones,  especially  when  bound  on  the  body, 
held  in  the  hand,  or  worn  around  the  neck. 

The  history  of  the  medieval  versions  of  Dioscorides, 
even  in  the  brief  and  incomplete  outline  given  here,  is  in- 
structive, showing  us  in  general  the  vicissitudes  to  which 
the  transmission  of  the  text  of  any  ancient  author  may  have 
been  subjected,  but  more  especially  proving  that  the  mid- 
dle ages,  whether  Latin  or  Byzantine,  were  ready  to  take 
great  liberties  with  ancient  authorities  and  to  adapt  them 
to  their  own  taste  and  requirements.  And  indeed,  why 
should   they   not   rearrange  and  make   additions   to   their 


*  A  work  by  Serapion  which 
Simon  Cordo  of  Genoa  translated 
from  Arabic  into  Latin  with  the 
help  of  Abraham,  a  Jew  of  Tor- 
tosa.  Serapion  states  at  the  be- 
ginning that  his  work  is  a  com- 
bination of  Dioscorides  and  of  the 
work  of  Galen  on  medicinal 
simples.  Aggregator  was  printed 
in  1479,  Liber  Scrapionis  ag- 
gregatus  in  medicinis  simplici- 
bus.  Translatio  Sytnonis  lanucn- 
sis  interprete  Abraani  iudco  tor- 
tiiosiensi  de,  arabico  in  latinum. 

^  Ruska    (1912),  p.  5,  says  that 


Pseudo- 
Dioscor- 
ides on 
stones. 


Conclu- 
sions 
from  the 
textual 
history  of 
Dioscor- 
ides. 


Dioscorides,  V,  84-133,  among 
other  things  describes  "eine  ganze 
Reihe  von  hochst  zweifelhaften 
Steinen  mit  unglaublichen  Wir- 
kungen  die  in  den  Arabischen 
Arzneimittelverzeichnissen  und 
Steinbiichern    niederkehren." 

^Amplon.  Folio  41,  fols.  36-7; 
Montpellier  277,  caps.  46-67  of  the 
treatise  entitled,  Liber  aristotelis 
de  lapidibus  preciosis  secundum 
verba  sapicntium  antiquorum. 

*  Sloane  3848,  17th  century,  fols. 
36-40. 


6l2 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Macer 
on  herbs; 
its  great 
currency. 


Problem 
of  date 
and 
author 


Dioscorides?  After  all  it  was  a  compilation  to  begin  with. 
But  the  case  of  Dioscorides  has  also  taught  us  that  we  do 
not  have  to  wait  until  the  medieval  period  for  the  appear- 
ance of  new  versions  of  an  ancient  author. 

With  the  possible  exception  of  the  Herbarium  of  the 
Pseudo-Apuleius,  probably  the  best  known  single  and  dis- 
tinct treatment  of  the  virtues  of  herbs  produced  during  the 
middle  ages  was  the  poem  De  virihiis  herbarum.'  which  cir- 
culated under  the  name  of  Macer  Floridus.^  It  was  often 
cited  by  the  medieval  encyclopedists  and  other  writers  on 
nature  and  medicine  in  the  twelfth  and  thirteenth  centuries. ^ 
It  is  found  in  an  Anglo-Saxon  version  ^  and  was  even  trans- 
lated into  Danish  in  the  early  thirteenth  century.^  Manu- 
scripts of  it  are  very  numerous  ^  and  there  are  many  early 
printed  editions.^  Even  as  recently  as  the  first  half  of  the 
nineteenth  century  a  historian  of  medicine  and  natural  sci- 
ence, in  the  preface  of  his  edition  of  Macer,  stated  as  one 
argument  for  the  modern  study  of  medieval  medicine  that 
much  might  be  learned  from  writings  of  that  period  con- 
cerning the  virtues  of  herbs.'^ 

The  poem  was  certainly  not  written  by  the  classical  poet, 
Aemilius  Macer,  who  was  a  friend  of  Vergil  and  Ovid,  and 
whose  descriptions  of  plants,  birds,  and  reptiles  are  cited 
by  Pliny  in  his  Natural  History  and  also  preserved  in  some 
extracts  by  the  grammarians.     Proof  of  this  is  that  our 

*  Macer  Floridus  de  viribus  her- 
barum  una  cum  Walafridi  Stra- 
bonis,  Othonis  Creinonensis  et 
loannis  Folcs  carminibus  similis 
argumcnti,  ed.  Ludovicus  Chou- 
lant,    1832. 

^  V.  Rose  himself  corrected 
{Hermes,  VIII,  330-1)  the  strange 
statement  which  he  had  made 
{Hermes,  VIII,  63)  that  the 
name  "Macer"  is  not  found  in 
connection  with  this  work  until 
MSS  of  the  14th  and  15th  centu- 
ries. Both  the  treatise  and  the 
name  are  frequent  in  the  earlier 
MSS. 

'Cotton,  Vitellius  C,  III. 

*  The  Dane,  Harpestreng,  who 
died  in  1244,  translated  and  com- 


mented upon  the  poem ;  published 
by  Christian  Molbech,  Copenha- 
gen, 1826. 

"  There  are  a  large  number  in 
the  MSS  collections  of  the  Brit- 
ish Museum  alone.  Some  said  to 
be  of  the  12th  century  are  Har- 
leian  4346,  and  at  Erfurt  Amplon. 
Octavo  62a  and  62b. 

°  See  the  British  Museum  cata- 
logue of  printed  books.  I  have 
used  besides  Choulant's  text  of 
1832  an  illustrated  octavo  edition 
probably  of  1489.  The  poem  also 
appears  in  medical  collections 
such  as  Medici  antiqui  omncs. 
Aldus,  Venice,   1547,   fols.  223-46. 

'  Choulant   (1832)    Preface. 


XXVI  PSEUDO-LITERATURE  IN  SCIENCE  613 

poem  cites  Pliny;  in  fact,  it  cites  him  more  frequently  than 
any  other  author.  It  also  cites  Galen  six  times,  Dioscorides 
four,  and  as  late  an  author  as  Oribasius  twice.^  But  Ori- 
basius  is  not  the  latest  author  cited  since  Walafrid  Strabo 
is  also  used.^  Strabo  was  born  about  806,  became  abbot  of 
Reichenau  in  842,  and  died  in  849.  In  his  Hortulus,  a  poem 
dedicated  to  Grimoald,  the  abbot  of  St.  Gall,  he  described 
twenty-three  herbs  in  444  hexameters.^  Indeed  Stadler  holds 
that  the  Pseudo-Macer  uses  the  De  gradibus  of  Constantinus 
Africanus  who  did  not  die  until  1087.*  The  true  author  of 
our  poem  ascribed  to  Macer  is  said  on  the  authority  of  cer- 
tain manuscripts  to  have  been  an  Odo  of  Meung  on  the 
Loire,  apparently  the  same  town  as  the  birthplace  of  Jean 
Clopinel  or  de  Meun,  the  learned  author  of  the  latter  por- 
tion of  The  Romance  of  the  Rose.  Choulant,  however,  did 
not  regard  this  as  sufficiently  proved,  and  Stadler  has  re- 
cently noted  that  some  manuscripts  ascribe  the  poem  to  a 
physician,  Odo  of  Verona;  and  others  to  the  Cistercian,  Odo 
of  Morimont,  who  died  in  1161.^  In  any  case,  unless 
the  mentions  of  Strabo  are  later  interpolations,  the  author 
must  be  regarded  as  post-Carolingian,  while  he  cannot  be 
later  than  the  eleventh  century  in  view  of  a  remark  of 
Sigebertus  Gemblacensis  in  1112,^  the  Anglo-Saxon  ver- 
sion, the  many  twelfth  century  manuscripts,  and  the  fre- 
quent use  of  his  poem  in  the  Regimen  Salernitaniim\  Al- 
though Macer  seems  a  pseudonym  to  begin  with,  the  original 
poem,  consisting  of  2269  lines  in  which  yy  herbs  are  dis- 
cussed, is  sometimes  accompanied  by  additional  lines  re- 
garded as  spurious.^ 

^Choulant   (1832)    Prolegomena  librum.    de    viribus    herbarum," — 

ad  Macrum,  p.  14.  Stadler    (1909),  65. 

^  See   the  description   of  Ligus-  '  It  was,  however,  a  good  deal 

ticuni.  lines  900-6.  subject  to  later  interpolation. 

^  Often  printed:  ed.  F.  A.  Reuss,  'Choulant  (1832)  adds  as  Mac- 

W-iirzburg,    1834;    in    Migne    PL  ri    spuria    487     lines     concerning 

114,  1 1 19-30.  twenty  herbs. 

*H.    Stadler,    Die    Quellcn    dcs  In    Vienna    3207,    15th    century, 

Macrr  F/on(/M.y,  in  Sudhoff  (1909).  fols.     1-50,    Macer    Floridus,    De 

*  Stadler,     op.     cit.;     Gioulant  viribus     herbarum ;     fols.     SO-52, 
(1832),  p.  4.     _     _  Pseudo-Macer,   De   animalibus   et 

*  "Macer    scripsit    metrico    stilo  lignis. 


6i4 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Virtues 
ascribed 
to  herbs. 


Our  poet  does  not  appear  to  have  much  of  his  own  to 
offer  on  the  subject  of  the  virtues  of  herbs.  When  he  does 
not  cite  his  authority  by  name,  he  usually  qualifies  the  state- 
ment made  by  a  vaguer  "they  say"  or  "it  is  said."  He  does 
not  connect  certain  herbs  with  certain  stars  or  otherwise 
introduce  anything  that  can  be  called  astrological.  He  re- 
peats Pliny's  statement  of  the  powers  ascribed  to  vervain  by 
the  magi,  such  as  to  gain  one's  desires,  win  the  friendship  of 
the  powerful,  and  dispel  disease  and  fever.  Pliny  had  spoken 
of  the  magi  as  "raving  about  this  herb" ;  our  poet  says : 

"Although  potent  Nature  can  grant  such  virtues, 
Yet  they  really  seem  to  us  idle  old-wives'  tales."  ■*■ 

Nevertheless  he  himself  about  fifteen  lines  before  had  said 
of  the  vervain: 

"If,  holding  this  herb  in  the  hand,  you  ask  the  patient, 
'Say,  brother,  how  are  you?'  and  the  patient  answers,  'Well,' 
He  will  live;  but  if  he  says  '111,'  there  is  no  hope  of  safety."  ^ 

Our  poet  not  only  thus  associates  with  herbs  the  virtue  of 
divination,  but  is  guilty  of  sympathetic  magic  when  he  be- 
lieves that  the  ancients  learned  by  experience  that  Dragontea 
or  snake-weed  dispels  poisons,  wards  off  snakes,  and  is  good 
for  snake-bite  from  observing  the  similarity  between  the 
spotted  rind  of  the  herb  and  the  skin  of  a  snake. ^  Odo  or 
Macer  repeats  Galen's  story  of  curing  an  epileptic  boy  by 
suspending  a  root  of  peony  about  his  neck,'*  and  later  as- 
serts the  same  virtue  for  the  herb  pyrethrum.^  Even  more 
magical  is  the  ceremony  for  curing  toothache  which  he  takes 
from  Pliny  and  which  consists  in  digging  up  the  herb  5*?- 
necion  without  use  of  iron,  touching  the  aching  tooth  with  it 
three  times,  and  then  replacing  the  plant  in  the  place  where 
it  came  from  so  that  it  will  grow  again. ^    Pliny  is  also  cited 

*  Lines    1901-2,    Quae,    quamvis  sponderit    eger,     Vivet,    si    vera 

natura    potens    concedere    posset  male,  spes  est  nulla  salutis. 
Vana   tamen  nobis  et  anilia  iure         ^  Herb  54.  lines   1728-. 
videntur.  *  Herb  49,  lines   1617-27. 

'  Lines     1881-3,     Hanc     herham  "  Herb   67,    lines   2095-. 

gestando  manu  si  queris  ab  egro  'Herb  51,  lines   1685-9. 

Die  frater  quid  agis?  bene  si  re- 


XXVI  PSEUDO-LITERATURE  IN  SCIENCE  615 

concerning  the  swallow's  restoring  the  sight  of  its  young  by 
swallow-wort.^  Our  poet  also  repeats  such  beliefs  as  that 
the  herb  Buglossa  preserves  the  memory,-  or  that  the  smoke 
of  Aristochia  dispels  demons  and  exhilarates  infants.^  If 
the  hives  are  anointed  with  the  juice  of  the  herb  Barrocus, 
the  bees  will  not  desert  them ;  while  carrying  that  plant  with 
one  is  a  protection  against  the  stings  of  bees,  wasps,  and 
spiders.^  Among  the  virtues  most  frequently  attributed  to 
herbs  are  expelling  or  killing  worms,  curing  pestiferous 
bites  or  poisons,  and  provoking  urine  or  vomiting.  On  the 
whole,  "Macer"  contains  only  a  moderate  amount  of  super- 
stition, although  rather  more  proportionally  than  Walafrid 
Strabo. 

Although  Odo  or  Macer  seems  to  make  no  original  con-  Experi- 
tribution  to  botany,  cites  authorities  frequently,  and  speaks  ^Macer. 
often  of  the  ancients  or  rnen  of  old,  he  also  at  least  once 
cites  "experts"  ^  and  we  have  also  seen  his  belief  that  the 
ancients  had  tested  the  virtues  of  plants  by  experience.  This 
rather  slight  experimental  character  of  the  work  is  further 
emphasized  in  some  manuscripts  of  it,  where  the  title  is 
"Experiments  of  Macer"  and  the  matter  seems  to  have 
been  re-arranged  under  diseases  instead  of  by  herbs. ^ 

'  Herb  52.  106-17,    "Experimenta    Macri.    Ad 

^  Herb  34,  lines  1 135-8.  dolorem  capitis.  Accipe  balsamum 

^  Herb  41,  lines   1421-2.  et   instilla  .../...  adde  sucum 

■*  Herb    50,    lines    1641-63.  celidonie     et     superpone     vulneri- 

*  Herb  69,  Cyminum,  lines  2118-  bus." 

9,  "Hoc  orthopnoicis  miram  praes-  Arundel  295,  14th  century,  fols. 

tare  medelam  Experti  dicunt  cum  222-33,    "Experimenta    Macri   col- 

pusce  saepius  haustum."  lecta  sub  certis  capitulis  a   Gote- 

'  Vienna  2532,  12th  century,  fols.  f rido." 


CHAPTER  XXVII 


OTHER  EARLY   MEDIEVAL  LEARNING  I 
BOETHIUS,  ISIDORE,   BEDE,  GREGORY  THE  GREAT 

Aridity  of  early  medieval  learning — Historic  importance  of  The  Con- 
solation of  Philosophy — Medieval  reading — Influence  of  the  w^orks  of 
Boethius — His  relation  to  antiquity  and  middle  ages — Attitude  to  the 
stars — Fate  and  free  vi^ill — Music  of  the  stars  and  universe — Isidore 
of  Seville — Method  of  the  Etymologies — Its  sources — iSlatural  marvels 
"-Isidore  is  rather  less  hospitable  to  superstition  than  Pliny — Portents 
—Words  and  numbers — History  of  magic — Definition  of  magic — Future 
influence  of  Isidore's  account  of  magic — Attitude  to  astrology — In  the 
De  natura  rerum — Bede's  scanty  science — Bede's  De  natura  rerum — 
Divination  by  thunder — Riddles  of  Aldhelm — Gregory's  Dialogues — 
Signs  and  wonders  wrought  by  saints — More  monkish  miracles — A 
monastic  snake-charmer — Basilius  the  magician — A  demon  salad — In- 
cantations in  Old  Irish — The  Fili. 

The  erudite  fortitude  of  students  of  the  Merovingian 
period  commands  our  admiration,  but  sometimes  inclines  us 
to  wonder  whether  anyone  without  a  somewhat  dry-as-dust 
constitution  could  penetrate  far  or  tarry  long  in  the  desert 
of  early  medieval  Latin  learning  without  perishing  of  intel- 
lectual thirst.  As  a  rule  the  writings  of  the  time  show  no 
originality  whatever,  and  least  of  all  any  scientific  investi- 
gation; they  are  of  value  merely  as  an  indication  of  what 
past  books  men  still  read  and  what  parts  of  past  science 
they  still  possessed  some  interest  in.  Under  the  same  cate- 
gory of  condemnation  may  be  placed  most  of  the  Carolingian 
period  so  far  as  our  investigation  is  concerned.  We  shall 
therefore  traverse  rapidly  this  period  of  sparse  scientific 
productivity  and  shall  be  doing  it  ample  justice,  if  from  its 
meager  list  of  writers  we  select  for  consideration  Boethius 
of  Italy  at  the  opening  of  the  sixth  century  and  Gregory 
the  Great  at  its  close,  Isidore  of  Spain  at  the  opening  of  the 

6l6 


CHAP.  XXVII      EARLY  MEDIEVAL  LEARNING 


617 


seventh  century,  and  Bede  in  England  at  the  beginning  of 
the  eighth  century,  with  some  brief  allusion  to  the  riddles 
of  Aldhelm,  bishop  of  Sherborne,  and  to  Old  Irish  litera- 
ture. We  should  gain  little  or  nothing  by  adding  to  the  list 
Alcuin  at  the  close  of  the  eighth  century  and  Rabanus  Mau- 
rus  in  the  ninth  century,  although  it  may  be  noted  nov^  that 
later  medieval  writers  cite  Rabanus  for  statements  which  I 
have  failed  to  find  in  his  printed  works.  In  general  it  may 
be  said  that  the  writers  whom  we  shall  consider  are  those 
during  the  period  who  are  most  cited  by  the  later  medieval 
authors. 

Of  the  distinguished  family  and  political  career  of  Boe- 
thius  who  lived  from  about  480  to  524  A.  D.,  and  his  final 
exile,  imprisonment,  and  execution  by  Theodoric  the  East 
Goth,  we  need  scarcely  speak  here.  Our  concern  is  with  his 
little  book.  The  Consolation  of  Philosophy,  one  of  those 
memorable  writings  which,  like  The  City  of  God  of  Augus- 
tine, stand  out  as  historical  landmarks  and  seem  to  have 
been  written  on  the  right  subject  by  the  right  man  at  the 
most  dramatic  moment.  The  timely  appearance  of  such 
works,  produced  in  both  these  cases  not  under  the  stimulus 
of  triumphant  victory  but  the  sting  of  bitter  defeat,  is  never- 
theless perhaps  less  surprising  than  is  their  subsequent  pres- 
ervation and  enormous  influence.  We  often  are  alternately 
amused  and  amazed  by  the  mistakes  concerning  historical 
and  chronological  detail  found  in  medieval  writers.  Yet 
medieval  readers  showed  considerable  appreciation  of  the 
course  of  history,  of  its  fundamental  tendencies,  and  of  its 
crucial  moments  by  the  works  which  they  included  in  their 
meager  libraries. 

But  were  medieval  libraries  as  meager  as  we  are  wont  to 
assume?  Bede  and  Alcuin  both  tell  of  the  existence  of 
sizeable  libraries  in  England,^  and  Cassiodorus  urged  those 
monks  whose  duty  it  was  to  tend  the  sick  to  read  a  number 
of  standard  medical  works.^     I  sometimes  wonder  if  too 


Historic 
impor- 
tance of 
The  Con- 
solation 
of  Phi- 
losophy. 


Medieval 
reading. 


*R.  L.  Poole,  Medieval  Thought,i8S4,  pp.   19,  21. 
*Migne,  PL  70,  1146. 


6i8 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


much  attention  has  not  been  given  to  medieval  writing  and 
too  Httle  to  medieval  reading,  of  which  so  much  medieval 
writing,  in  Latin  at  least,  is  little  more  than  a  reflection.  We 
get  their  image,  faint  perhaps  and  partial ;  but  they  had  the 
real  object.  It  has  been  assumed  by  some  modern  scholars 
that  medieval  writers  had  usually  not  read  the  works,  es- 
pecially of  classical  antiquity,  which  they  profess  to  cite 
and  quote,  but  relied  largely  upon  anthologies  and  florilegia. 
In  the  case  of  various  later  medieval  authors  we  shall  have 
occasion  to  discuss  this  question  further.  For  the  present 
I  may  say  that  in  going  through  the  catalogues  of  collec- 
tions of  medieval  manuscripts  I  have  noticed  few  florilegia 
or  anthologies  from  the  classics  in  medieval  Latin  manu- 
scripts,— perhaps  Byzantine  ones  from  Greek  literature  are 
more  common — and  few  indeed  compared  to  the  number  of 
manuscripts  of  the  old  Latin  writers  themselves.  We  owe 
the  very  preservation  of  the  Latin  classics  to  medieval 
scribes  who  copied  them  in  the  ninth  and  tenth  centuries; 
why  deny  that  they  read  them  ?  Latin  florilegia  of  any  sort 
do  not  exist  in  impressive  numbers,  but  other  kinds  are  as 
often  met  with  as  are  those  from  classic  poets  or  prose 
writers,  for  instance,  selections  from  the  church  fathers 
themselves.  On  the  whole,  the  impression  I  have  received 
is  that  those  authors  included  in  florilegia,  commonplace 
books,  and  other  manuscripts  made  up  of  miscellaneous  ex- 
tracts, were  likewise  the  authors  most  read  in  toto.  I  am 
therefore  inclined  to  regard  the  florilegia  as  a  proof  that  the 
authors  included  were  read  rather  than  that  they  were  not. 
But  from  extant  Latin  manuscripts  one  gets  the  impression 
that  the  whole  matter  of  florilegia  is  of  very  slight  impor- 
tance, and  that  the  theory  hitherto  based  upon  them  is  a 
survival  of  the  prejudice  of  the  classical  renaissance  against 
"the  dark  ages." 

At  any  rate,  however  scanty  medieval  libraries  may 
have  been,  they  were  apt  to  include  a  copy  of  The  Consola- 
tion of  Philosophy,  and  however  little  read  some  of  their 
volumes    may   have   been,    its   pages    were    certainly   well 


XXVII 


EARLY  MEDIEVAL  LEARNING 


619 


thumbed.  Lists  of  its  commentators,  translators,  and  imi- 
tators, and  other  indications  of  its  vast  medieval  influence 
may  be  found  in  Peiper's  edition.^  Other  writings  of  Boe- 
thius  were  also  well  known  in  the  middle  ages  and  increased 
his  reputation  then.  His  translations  and  commentaries 
upon  the  Aristotelian  logical  treatises  ^  are  of  course  of  great 
importance  in  the  history  of  medieval  scholasticism.  His 
translations  and  adaptations  of  Greek  treatises  in  arithme- 
tic, geometry,  and  music  occupy  a  similar  place  in  the  his- 
tory of  medieval  mathematical  studies.^  Indeed,  his  treatise 
on  music  is  said  to  have  "continued  to  be  the  staple  requisite 
for  the  musical  degree  at  Oxford  until  far  into  the  eight- 
eenth century."  ^  The  work  on  the  Trinity  and  some  other 
theological  tracts,  attributed  to  Boethius  by  Cassiodorus  and 
through  the  middle  ages,  are  now  again  accepted  as  genuine 
by  modem  scholars  and  place  Boethius'  Christianity  beyond 
question.^ 

Boethius  has  often  been  regarded  as  a  last  representative  His  rela- 
of  Roman  statesmanship  and  of  classical  civilization.     His    antiquity 
defense  of  Roman  provincials  against  the  greed  of  the  Goths,    ^1^ 
his  stand  even  unto  death  against  Theodoric  on  behalf  of  the   ages, 
rights  of  the  Roman  senate  and  people,  his  preservation 
through  translation  of  the  learned  treatises  of  expiring  an- 


^  Anicii  Manlii  Severini  Boetii 
Philosophiae  Consolationis  Libri 
quinque,  ed.  R.  Peiper,  Lipsiae, 
1871,  pp.  xxxix-xlvi,  li-lxvii.  See 
also  Manitius   (1911),  pp.  33-5. 

It  was  by  seeking  comfort  in 
The  Consolation  of  P-hitosophy 
after  the  death  of  Beatrice  that 
Dante  was  led  into  a  new  world 
of  literature,  science,  and  phi- 
losophy, as  he  tells  us  in  his  Con- 
vivio;  cited  by  Orr    (1913),  p.   i. 

^Manitius    (1911),  pp.  29-32. 

''Ibid.,  26-8.  At  the  time  I 
went  through  the  various  cata- 
logues of  MSS  in  the  British  Mu- 
seum item  by  item  it  was  not  my 
intention  to  include  Boethius  in 
this  investigation,  and  I  am  there- 
fore unable  to  say  whether  the 
Museum    has    MSS    which    may 


throw  further  light  upon  the 
problems  connected  with  the 
mathematical  treatises  ascribed  to 
Boethius.  Manitius  mentions  no 
English  MSS  in  this  connection, 
but  there  are  likely  to  be  some  at 
London,   Oxford,  or  Cambridge. 

*  Boethius'  Consolation  of  Phil- 
osophy, translated  from  the  Latin 
by  George  Colville,  1556;  ed.  with 
Introduction  by  E.  B.  Box,  Lon- 
don,  1897,  p.  xviii. 

*  Manitius  (1911)  pp.  35-6; 
Usener,  Anccdota  Holdcri,  Bonn, 
1877,  pp.  48-59;  E.  K.  Rand,  Der 
dent  Boethius  sugcschriebene 
Traktat  De  fide  catholica,  1901. 
The  De  fide  catholica,  however, 
is  not  mentioned  by  Cassiodo- 
rus  and  is   regarded  as  spurious. 


620  MAGIC  'AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

tiquity,  and  the  almost  classical  Latin  style  and  numerous 
allusions  to  pagan  mythology  of  The  Consolation  of  Phi- 
losophy:— all  these  combine  to  support  this  view.  But  the 
middle  ages  also  made  Boethius  their  own,  and  several 
points  may  be  noted  in  which  The  Consolation  of  Philosophy 
in  particular  foreshadowed  their  attitude  and  profoundly  in- 
fluenced them.  Both  a  Christian  and  a  classicist,  both  a 
theologian  and  a  philosopher,  Boethius  set  a  standard  which 
subsequent  thought  was  to  follow  for  a  long  time.  The 
very  form  of  his  work,  a  dialogue  part  in  prose  and  part  in 
verse,  remained  a  medieval  favorite.  And  the  fact  that  this 
sixth  century  author  of  a  work  on  the  Trinity  consoled  his 
last  hours  with  a  work  in  which  Christ  and  the  Trinity  are 
not  mentioned,  but  where  Phoebus  is  often  named  and  where 
Philosophy  is  the  author's  sole  interlocutor  : — this  fact,  com- 
bined with  Boethius'  great  medieval  popularity,  gave  per- 
petual license  to  those  medieval  writers  who  chose  to  dis- 
cuss philosophy  and  theology  as  separate  subjects  and  from 
distinct  points  of  view.  The  great  medieval  influence  of 
Aristotle  and  Plato,  and  in  particular  of  the  latter's  Timaeus, 
also  is  already  manifest  in  The  Consolation  of  Philosophy. 
Aristotle,  it  is  true,  appears  to  be  incorrectly  credited  by 
Boethius  with  the  assertion  that  the  eye  of  the  lynx  can  see 
through  solid  objects,^  but  this  ascription  of  spurious  state- 
ments to  the  Stagirite  also  corresponds  to  the  attribution  of 
entire  spurious  treatises  to  him  later  in  the  middle  ages. 

Of  the  ways  in  which  The  Cofisolation  of  Philosophy 
influenced  medieval  thought  that  which  is  most  germane  to 
our  investigation  is  its  attitude  toward  the  stars  and  the 
problem  of  fate  and  free  will.  The  heavenly  bodies  are 
apparently  ever  present  in  Boethius'  thought  in  this  work, 
and  especially  in  the  poetical  interludes  he  keeps  mention- 
ing Phoebus,  the  moon,  the  universe,  the  sky,  and  the  starry 
constellations.  Per  ardna  ad  astra  was  a  true  saying  for 
those  last  days  in  which  he  solaced  his  disgrace  and  pain 
with  philosophy.     It  is  by  contemplation  of  the  heavens 

^De  consol.  philos.,  Ill,  8,  21. 


XXVII  EARLY  MEDIEVAL  LEARNING  621 

that  he  raises  his  thought  to  lofty  philosophic  reflection; 
his  mind  may  don  swift  wings  and  fly  far  above  earthly 
things 

"Until  it  reaches  starry  mansions 
And  joins  paths  with  Phoebus."  ^ 

He  loves  to  think  of  God  as  ruling  the  universe  by  perpetual 
reason  and  certain  order,  as  sowing  stars  in  the  sky,  as  bind- 
ing the  elements  by  number,  as  Himself  immovable,  yet  re- 
volving the  spheres  and  decreeing  natural  events  in  a  fixed 
series.^  The  attitude  is  like  that  of  the  Timaens  and  Aris- 
totle's Metaphysics,  closely  associating  astronomy  and  the- 
ology, favorable  to  belief  in  astrology,  in  support  of  which 
later  scholastic  writers  cite  Boethius. 

We  may  further  note  the  main  points  in  Boethius'  ar-  Pate  and 
gument  concerning  fate  and  free  will,  providence  and  pre-  ^^^^  ^'^^• 
destination,^  which  was  often  cited  by  later  writers.  He 
declares  that  all  generation  and  change  and  movement  pro- 
ceed from  the  divine  mind  or  Providence,*  while  fate  is  the 
regular  arrangement  inherent  in  movable  objects  by  which 
divine  providence  is  realized.^  Fate  may  be  exercised 
through  spirits,  angelic  or  daemonic,  through  the  soul  or 
through  the  aid  of  all  nature  or  "by  the  celestial  motion  of 
the  stars."  ®  It  is  with  the  last  that  Boethius  seems  most  in- 
clined to  identify  fati  series  mohilis.  "That  series  moves 
sky  and  stars,  harmonizes  the  elements  one  with  another, 
and  transforms  them  from  one  to  another."  More  than 
that,  "It  constrains  human  fortunes  in  an  indissoluble  chain 
of  causes,  which,  since  it  starts  from  the  decree  of  immov- 
able Providence,  must  needs  itself  also  be  immutable."  '^ 
Boethius,  however,  does  not  believe  in  a  complete  fatalism, 
astrological  or  otherwise.     He  holds  that  nothing  escapes 

^  De  consol.  philos.,  IV,  i.  solet."     To  the  ensuing  argument 

^  Ibid.,    III.    9,    i;    III,    12,    14;  are  devoted  the  sixth  and  seventh 

III,  9,   10;   III,   12,  99;   II,  8,   13.  chapters   of   Book   IV  and  all  of 

'Ibid.,  IV,  6,   10,  "In  hac  enim  Book  V. 

de    providentiae     simplicitate,     de  *  Ibid.,   IV,  6,   21. 

fati    serie,    de    repentinis    casibus,  ^  Ibid.,  IV,  6,  30. 

de   cognitione  ac  praedestinatione  ^  Ibid.,  IV,  6,  48. 

divina,  de  arbitrii  libertate  quaeri  '  Ibid.,  IV,  6,  yy. 


622 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Music  of 
the  stars 
and  uni- 
verse. 


divine  providence,  to  which  there  is  no  distinction  between 
past,  present,  and  future.^  As  the  human  reason  can  con- 
ceive universals,  aUhough  sense  and  imagination  are  able  to 
deal  only  with  particulars,  so  the  divine  mind  can  foresee  the 
future  as  well  as  the  present.  But  there  are  some  things 
which  are  under  divine  providence  but  which  are  not  sub- 
ject to  fate.^  Divine  providence  imposes  no  fatal  necessity 
upon  the  human  will,  which  is  free  to  choose  its  course.^ 
The  world  of  nature,  however,  existing  without  will  or  rea- 
son of  its  own,  conforms  absolutely  to  the  fatal  series  pro- 
vided for  it.  As  for  chance,  Boethius  agrees  with  Aristotle's 
Physics  that  there  is  really  no  such  thing,  but  that  what  is 
commonly  ascribed  to  chance  really  results  from  an  unex- 
pected coincidence  of  causes,  as  when  a  man  plowing  a  field 
finds  a  treasure  which  another  has  buried  there.*  Thus 
Boethius  maintains  the  co-existence  of  the  fatal  series  ex- 
pressed in  the  stars,  divine  providence,  and  human  free  will, 
a  thesis  likely  to  reassure  Christians  inclined  to  astrology 
who  had  been  somewhat  disturbed  by  the  fulminations  of 
the  fathers  against  the  genethliaci,  just  as  his  constant  rhap- 
sodizing over  the  stars  and  heavens  would  lead  them  to  re- 
gard the  science  of  the  stars  as  second  only  to  divine  worship. 
Indeed,  his  position  was  the  usual  one  in  the  subsequent 
middle  ages. 

The  stars  also  come  into  Boethius'  treatise  on  music, 
where  one  of  the  three  varieties  of  music  is  described  as 
mundane,  where  the  music  of  the  spheres  is  declared  to 
exist  although  inaudible  to  us,  and  where  each  planet  is  con- 
nected with  a  musical  chord.  Plato  is  quoted  as  having 
said,  not  in  vain,  that  the  world  soul  is  compounded  of 
musical  harmony,  and  it  is  affirmed  that  the  four  diff'erent 
and  contrary  elements  could  never  be  united  in  one  system 
unless  some  harmony  joined  them.^ 


^  De  consol  philos.,  V,  4-6. 

=■  Ibid.,  IV,  6,  58. 

'Ibid.,  V,  2-3  and  6,  110,  "tam- 
etsi  nullam  naturae  habeat  neces- 
sitatem  atqui  deus  ea  futura  quae 
ex     arbitrii     libertate     proveniunt 


praesentia  contuetur." 

*Ibid.,V,  I. 

^  De  musica  libri  quinque,  I, 
1-2  and  27;  in  Migne,  PL  63,  1167- 
1300. 


XXVII  EARLY  MEDIEVAL  LEARNING  623 

Isidore  was  bom  about  560  or  570,  became  bishop  of   Isidore  of 


Seville  in  599  or  600,  and  died  in  the  year  636.  Although 
mention  should  perhaps  be  made  of  his  briefer  De  natura 
rerunv,^  a  treatise  dedicated  to  King  Sisebut  who  reigned 
from  612  to  620,  Isidore's  chief  work  from  our  standpoint 
is  the  Etymologiae?  His  friend,  bishop  Braulio,  writing 
after  Isidore's  death,  says  that  he  had  left  unfinished  the 
copy  of  this  work  which  he  made  at  his  request,  but  this  was 
apparently  a  second  edition,  since  in  a  letter  written  to  Isi- 
dore probably  in  630,  Braulio  speaks  of  copies  as  already 
in  circulation,  although  he  describes  their  text  as  corrupt 
and  abbreviated.  But  apparently  the  work  had  been  com- 
posed seven  years  before  this.^  The  Etymologies  was  un- 
doubtedly a  work  of  great  importance  and  influence  in  the 
middle  ages,  but  one  should  not  be  led,  as  some  writers  have 
been,  into  exaggerated  praise  of  Isidore's  erudition  on  this 
account.'*  For  the  work's  importance  consists  chiefly  in 
showing  how  scanty  was  the  knowledge  of  the  early  middle 
ages.  Its  influence  also  would  seem  not  to  have  been  en- 
tirely beneficial,  since  writers  continued  to  cite  it  as  an  au- 
thority as  late  as  the  thirteenth  century,  when  it  might  have 
been  expected  to  have  outlived  its  usefulness.  We  suspect 
that  it  proved  too  handy  and  convenient  and  tended  to  en- 
courage intellectual  laziness  and  stagnation  more  than  any 
anthology  of  literary  quotations  did.     Arevalus  listed  ten 

^Migne,    PL   83,    963-1018.     In  Dark    Ages;    Isidore    of   Seville, 

Harleian    3099,    1134    A.    D.,    the  1912,      in      Columbia      University 

Etymologies    at    fols.    i-iS4.    are  Studies  in  History,  etc.,  vol.  48,  pp. 

followed  by  the  De  natura  rerum,  1-274.    For  Isidorean  bibliography 

the    last    chapter    of    which    (fol.  see  pp.  17,  22-3,  46-7  of  Brehaut's 

164V)    is  numbered  42  instead  of  introduction. 

48  as  in  Migne.     But  up  to  chap-  '  Manitius     (1911),    pp.    60-61; 
ter  27,  Utrum  sidera  animam  ha-  Brehaut   (1912),  p.  34. 
beant,   the   division    into   chapters  *  To  say,  for  example,  that  "so 
seems  the  same  as  in  the  printed  hospitable  an  attitude  toward  pro- 
text,  fane  learning  as  Isidore  displayed 

*  Migne,  PL  82,  73-728,  a  reprint  .  .  .  was  never  surpassed  through- 

of  the  edition  of  Arevalus,  Rome,  out    the    middle    ages"     (Brehaut, 

1796.     Large  portions  of  the  Ety-  p.    31),    is    unfair   to   many    later 

mologies  have  been  translated  into  writers,  as  our  discussion  of  the 

English    with    an    introduction    of  natural  science  of  the  twelfth  and 

some   seventy   pages   by    E.    Bre-  thirteenth   centuries    will   show. 
haut,    An    Encyclopedist    of    the 


Seville. 


624 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Method 
of  the 
Etymolo- 
gies. 


Its 
sources. 


printed  editions  of  it  before  1527,  showing  that  it  was  as 
popular  in  the  time  of  the  Renaissance  as  in  the  middle  ages. 

The  Etymologies  is  little  more  than  a  dictionary,  in 
which  words  are  not  listed  alphabetically  but  under  subjects 
with  an  average  of  from  one  to  a  half  dozen  lines  of  deriva- 
tion and  definition  for  each  term.  The  method  is,  as  Brehaut 
well  says,  "to  treat  each  subject  by  ,  .  .  defining  the  terms 
belonging  to  it."  ^  Pursuing  this  method,  Isidore  treats  of 
various  arts  and  sciences,  human  interests  and  natural  phe- 
nomena :  the  seven  liberal  arts,  medicine,  and  law ;  chro- 
nology and  bibliography ;  the  church,  religion,  and  theology ; 
the  state  and  family,  physiology,  zoology,  botany,  mineral- 
ogy, geography,  and  astronomy;  architecture  and  agricul- 
ture ;  war  and  sport ;  arms  and  armor ;  ships  and  costume  and 
various  utensils  of  domestic  life.  Such  is  the  classification 
which  later  medieval  writers  were  to  adopt  or  adapt  rather 
than  the  arrangement  followed  in  Pliny's  Natural  History. 
Isidore's  association  of  words  and  definitions  under  topics 
makes  an  approach,  at  least,  to  the  articles  of  encyclopedias : 
sometimes  there  is  a  brief  discussion  of  the  general  topic 
before  the  particular  terms  and  names  are  considered ;  some- 
times there  are  chronological  tables,  family  trees,  or  lists 
of  signs  and  abbreviations.  In  short,  Isidore  forms  a  con- 
necting link  between  Pliny  and  the  encyclopedists  of  the 
thirteenth  century. 

In  a  prefatory  word  to  Braulio  Isidore  describes  the 
Etymologies  as  a  collection  made  from  his  recollection  and 
notes  of  old  authors,^  of  whom  he  cites  a  large  number  in 
the  course  of  the  work.  It  has  been  suspected  that  some  of 
these  writers  were  known  to  Isidore  only  at  second  or  third 
hand ;  at  any  rate  he  has  not  made  a  very  discriminating  se- 
lection from  their  works  and  he  has  been  accused  more  than 
once  of  not  clearly  understanding  what  he  tried  to  abridge. 
On  the  other  hand,  Isidore  seems  to  me  to  display  a  notable 

'Brehaut    (1912),  p.  34.  lectum,    atque    ita    in    quibusdam 

'  Migne,    PL  82,   73,   "Opus   de  locis  adnotatum,  sicut  exstat  con- 

origine     quarumdam     rerum,     ex  scriptum  stylo  maiorum." 

veteris  lectionis   recordatione   col- 


XXVII  EARLY  MEDIEVAL  LEARNING  625 

power  of  brief  generalization,  of  terse  expression  and  telling 
use  of  words.  We  should  not  have  to  go  back  to  the  middle 
ages  for  textbook  writers  who  have  written  more  and  said 
less.  This  power  of  condensed  expression  probably  ac- 
counts for  Isidore's  being  so  much  cited.  Many  of  the  deri- 
vations proposed  for  words  are  so  patently  absurd  that  we 
would  fain  ascribe  them  to  Isidore's  own  perverse  ingenuity, 
but  it  is  doubtful  if  he  possessed  even  that  much  originality, 
and  they  are  probably  all  taken  from  classical  grammarians 
such  as  Varro.^  Isidore,  however,  still  displays  a  consider- 
able knowledge  of  the  Greek  language.  And  again  it  may 
be  said  in  excuse  of  Isidore  and  his  sources  that  the  absurd 
etymologies  are  usually  proposed  in  the  case  of  words  whose 
derivation  is  still  problematic. 

In  the  passages  dealing  with  natural  phenomena  and  sci- 
ence Isidore  borrows  chiefly  from  Pliny  and  Solinus,  some- 
times from  Dioscorides,  giving  us  a  faint  adumbration  of 
their  much  fuller  confusion  of  science  and  superstition.  Oc- 
casionally bits  of  information  or  misinformation  are  bor- 
rowed through  the  medium  of  the  church  fathers.  A  work 
of  Galen,  for  instance,  is  cited  ^  through  the  letter  of 
Jerome  to  Furia  against  widows  remarrying.  Galen,  in- 
deed, is  seldom  mentioned  by  Isidore  who  draws  his  unusu- 
ally brief  fourth  book  on  medicine  chiefly  from  Caelius  Au- 
relianus.^ 

In  his  treatment  of  things  in  nature  Isidore  seldom  gives  Natural 
their  medicinal  properties  as  Pliny  does,  and  this  reduces  "^^.rvels. 
correspondingly  the  amount  of  space  devoted  to  marvelous 
virtues.  Indeed,  of  the  twenty  books  of  the  Etymologies 
but  one  is  devoted  to  animals  other  than  man,  one  to  vege- 
tation which  is  combined  in  the  same  book  with  agriculture, 
and  one  to  metals  and  minerals.  The  book  on  animals  is 
the  longest  and  is  subdivided  under  the  topics  of  domestic 

*  See,     for     example,     EtymoL,  who   cared   for  the  sick  to   read 

VIII,  7,  3,  "Vates  a  vi  mentis  ap-  Hippocrates  and  Galen  as  well  as 

pellatos,   Varro   auctor   est."  Dioscorides  and   Caelius   Aurelia- 

"  Etymol,  XX,  2,  37.  nus ;  Brehaut   (1912),  p.  87,  note, 

^  Cassiodorus,    however,    urged  citing  PL  70,  1146,  in  the  De  instit. 

the   monks   of    the    sixth   century  divin.    littcrarum. 


626 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Isidore  is 
rather 
less  hos- 
pitable to 
super- 
stition 
than 
Pliny. 


animals,  wild  beasts,  minute  animals,  serpents,  worms,  fish, 
birds,  and  minute  flying  creatures.  Isidore  also  tends  to 
ascribe  more  marvelous  virtues  to  animals  than  to  plants 
or  stones.  From  Pliny  and  Solinus  are  repeated  the  tales 
of  the  basilisk,  echeneis,  and  the  like,^  while  Augustine's 
Commentary  on  the  Psalms  is  cited  for  the  story  of  the  asp 
resisting  the  incantations  of  its  charmers  by  laying  one  ear 
to  the  ground  and  stopping  up  the  other  ear  with  the  end  of 
its  tail.^  On  the  other  hand,  Isidore  omits  Pliny's  super- 
stitious assertions  concerning  the  river  tortoise  and  gives 
only  his  criticism  that  the  statement  that  ships  move  more 
slowly  if  they  have  the  foot  of  a  tortoise  aboard  is  incred- 
ible.^ Even  in  the  books  on  minerals  and  vegetation  we 
still  hear  of  animal  marvels :  *  how  the  coloring  matter,  cin- 
nabar, is  composed  of  the  blood  shed  by  the  dragon  in  its 
death  struggle  with  the  elephant,  how  the  fiercest  bulls  grow 
tame  under  the  Egyptian  fig-tree,  how  swallows  restore  the 
sight  of  their  young  with  the  swallow-wort,  or  of  the  use  of 
fennel  and  rue  by  the  snake  and  weasel  respectively,  the 
former  tasting  fennel  to  enable  him  to  shed  his  old  skin,  and 
the  latter  eating  rue  to  make  him  immune  from  venom  in 
fighting  the  snake.    All  these  items,  too,  are  from  Pliny. 

But  on  the  whole  I  should  estimate  that  Isidore  contains 
less  superstitious  matter  even  proportionally  to  his  meager 
content  than  Pliny  does  in  connection  with  the  virtues  of 
animals,  plants,  and  stones.  In  discussing  plants  he  says 
nothing  of  ceremonial  plucking  of  them  and  he  contains 
practically  no  traces  of  agricultural  magic.  He  describes 
as  a  superstition  of  the  Gentiles  the  notion  that  the  herb 
scylla,  suspended  whole  at  the  threshold,  drives  away  all 
evils. ^  He  mentions  the  use  of  mandragora  as  an  anaes- 
thetic in  surgical  operations,  and  remarks  that  its  root  is  of 
human  form,  but  says  nothing  of  its  applications  in  magic.^ 
In  his  discussion  of  stones  he  repeats  after  Pliny  and  So- 


^  Etymol.,  XII,  4,  6  and  6,  34. 

^Ibid.,  XII,  4,  12. 

^Ibid.,  XII,  6,  56. 

*lbid.,  XVII,  7,   17  and  9,  2>^; 


XIX,  17,  8. 
"  Ibid.,  XVII,  9,  85. 
Ubid.,  XVII,  9,  30. 


XXVII 


EARLY  MEDIEVAL  LEARNING 


627 


linus  the  marvelous  virtues  ascribed  to  a  number  of  them, 
but  follows  Pliny's  method  of  making  the  magicians  re- 
sponsible for  these  assertions  or  of  inserting  a  word  of  cau- 
tion such  as  "if  this  is  to  be  believed"  with  each  statement. 
Finally  he  introduces  together  a  number  of  cases  of  mar- 
velous powers  ascribed  to  stones  with  the  introduction, 
"There  are  certain  gems  employed  by  the  Gentiles  in  their 
superstitions."  ^ 

Isidore  lists  a  number  of  mythical  monsters  as  well  as  Portents, 
cases  of  portentous  births  in  the  third  chapter,  De  portentis, 
of  his  eleventh  book.  He  there  affirms  that  God  sometimes 
wishes  to  signify  future  events  by  means  of  monstrous  births 
as  well  as  by  dreams  and  oracles,  and  declares  that  this  "has 
been  proved  by  numerous  experiences."  ^ 

Brehaut  is  impressed  by  Isidore's  "confidence  in  words,"  Words 
which  he  thinks  "really  amounted  to  a  belief,  strong  though  numbers 
perhaps  somewhat  inarticulate,  that  words  were  transcen- 
dental entities."  ^  Isidore's  faith  in  the  power  of  words 
does  not  seem,  however,  to  have  led  him  to  recommend  the 
use  of  any  incantations;  he  was  content  with  etymologies 
and  allegorical  interpretation.  He  was  also  a  great  believer 
in  the  mystic  significance  of  numbers  and  wrote  a  separate 
treatise  upon  those  numbers  which  occur  in  the  sacred 
Scriptures.  In  the  Etymologies,  too,  he  more  than  once 
dwells  upon  the  perfection  of  certain  numbers.  We  have 
already  heard  how  perfect  most  of  the  numbers  up  to  twelve 
are,  but  this  is  our  first  opportunity  to  hear  the  Pythagorean 
method  applied  to  the  number  twenty-two.  However,  Isi- 
dore is  not  the  first  to  do  this ;  he  is,  indeed,  simply  quoting 
one  of  the  fathers,  Epiphanius.^  "The  modiits  is  so-called 
because  it  is  of  perfect  mode.  For  this  measure  contains 
forty-four  pounds,  that  is,  twenty-two  sextarii.  And  the 
reason  for  this  number  is  that  in  the  beginning  God  per- 
formed twenty-two  works.     For  on  the  first  day  He  made 

^Etymol,  XVI,    15,  21-26. 
^  Ibtd.,  XI,  3,  4,  "quod  plurimis 
etiam  experimentis  probatum  est." 
'  Brehaut  (1912),  p.  3. 


*  EfymoL,  XVI,  26,  10,  from 
Epiphanius,  Liber  de  ponderibus 
et  mensuris. 


628  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

seven  works,  namely,  unformed  matter,  angels,  light,  the 
upper  heavens,  earth,  water,  and  air.  On  the  second  day 
only  one  work,  the  firmament.  On  the  third  day  four  things  : 
the  seas,  seeds,  grass,  and  trees.  On  the  fourth  day  three 
things:  sun  and  moon  and  stars.  On  the  fifth  day  three: 
fish  and  aquatic  reptiles  and  flying  creatures.  On  the  sixth 
day  four :  beasts,  domestic  animals,  land  reptiles,  and  man. 
And  all  twenty-two  kinds  were  made  in  six  days.^  And  there 
are  twenty-two  generations  from  Adam  to  Jacob.  .  .  .  And 
twenty-two  books  of  the  Old  Testament.  .  .  .  And  there 
are  twenty-two  letters  from  which  the  doctrine  of  the  divine 
law  is  composed.  Therefore  in  accordance  with  these  ex- 
amples the  modius  of  twenty-two  sextarii  was  established 
by  Moses  following  the  measure  of  sacred  law.  And  al- 
though various  peoples  have  added  something  to  or  igno- 
rantly  subtracted  something  from  its  weight,  it  is  divinely 
preserved  among  the  Hebrews  for  such  reasons."  With 
such  mental  magic  and  pious  "arithmetic,"  as  Isidore's 
friend  Braulio  called  it,  might  the  Christian  attempt  to  sate 
the  inherited  thirst  within  him  for  the  operative  magic  and 
pagan  divination  in  which  his  conscience  and  church  no 
longer  allowed  him  to  indulge. 
History  Isidore's  chapter  on  the  Magi  or  magicians,  which  oc- 

curs in  his  eighth  book  on  the  church  and  divers  sects,  is  a 
notable  one,  of  whose  great  future  influence  we  shall  pres- 
ently speak.  His  own  borrowing  here  is  only  in  small  part 
from  Pliny's  famous  passage  on  the  same  theme.  On  such 
a  subject  Isidore  naturally  has  recourse  mainly  to  Christian 
writers :  Augustine,  Jerome,  Lactantius,  Tertullian.  From 
the  occasional  similarity  of  his  wording  to  these  authors  it 
seems  fairly  certain  that  his  account  is  a  patchwork  from 
their  works,  and  the  context  is  too  Christian  to  have  been 
drawn  in  toto  from  some  Roman  encyclopedist  now  lost  to 
us.  Perhaps  the  most  noteworthy  point  about  Isidore's  chap- 
ter is  that  he  has  made  magic  and  magicians  the  general  and 

*  Hence,  presumably,  the  sextarii,  from  sex. 


XXVII  EARLY  MEDIEVAL  LEARNING  629 

inclusive  head  under  which  he  presently  lists  various  other 
minor  occult  arts  and  their  practitioners  for  separate  defi- 
nition. But  first  we  have  a  longer  discussion,  though  long 
only  by  comparison,  of  magic  in  general.  Its  history  is 
sketched;  Zoroaster  and  Democritus,  as  in  Pliny,  are  men- 
tioned as  its  founders,  but  it  is  not  forgotten  that  the  bad 
angels  were  really  responsible  for  its  dissemination.  From 
the  first  Isidore  identifies  magic  and  divination;  after  stating 
that  the  magic  arts  abounded  among  the  Assyrians,  he  quotes 
a  passage  from  Lucan  which  speaks  of  the  prevalence  of 
liver  divination,  augury,  divination  from  thunder,  and  as- 
trology in  Assyria.  Also  the  magic  arts  are  said  to  have 
prevailed  over  the  whole  world  for  many  centuries  through 
their  prediction  of  the  future  and  invocation  of  the  dead. 
Brief  allusion  is  further  made  to  Moses  and  Pharaoh's  ma- 
gicians, to  the  invocation  of  Samuel  by  the  witch  of  Endor, 
to  Circe  and  the  comrades  of  Ulysses,  and  to  several  other 
passages  in  classical  literature  anent  magic. 

Next  comes  a  formal  definition  of  the  Magi.  They  are  Definition 
"those  who  are  popularly  called  maleiici  or  sorcerers  on  ac-  °  i"ag*c. 
count  of  the  magnitude  (a  characteristic  bit  of  derivation) 
of  their  crimes.  They  agitate  the  elements,  disturb  men's 
minds,  and  slay  merely  by  force  of  incantation  without  any 
poisoned  draught.  Hence  Lucan  writes,  'The  mind,  though 
polluted  by  no  venom  of  poisoned  draught,  perishes  by  en- 
chantment.' ^  For,  summoning  demons,  they  dare  to  work 
their  magic  so  that  anyone  may  kill  his  enemies  by  evil  arts. 
They  also  use  blood  and  victims  and  sometimes  corpses." 
After  this  very  unfavorable,  although  sufficiently  credulous, 
definition  of  magic,  which  is  represented  as  seeking  the 
worst  ends  by  the  worst  means,  Isidore  goes  on  to  list  and 
briefly  define  a  number  of  subordinate  or  kindred  occult  arts. 
First  come  necromancers;  then  hydromancy,  geomancy, 
aeromancy,  and  pyromancy;  next  diviners,  those  employing 
incantations,  arioli,  aruspices,  augurs,  auspices,  pythones, 
astrologers  and  their  cognates,  the  genethliaci  and  mathe- 

^"Mens  hausti  nulla  sanie  polluta  veneni 
Incantata  peril  .  .  ." 


630 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Future  in- 
fluence of 
Isidore's 
account 
of  magic. 


matici,  who  as  Isidore  notes  are  spoken  of  in  the  Gospel  as 
Magi,  and  horoscopi.  "Sortilegi  are  those  who  profess  the 
science  of  divination  under  the  pretended  guise  of  rehgion 
through  certain  devices  called  sortes  sanctorimi  and  predict 
by  inspection  of  certain  scriptures."  Salisatores  are  those 
who  predict  from  the  jerks  of  their  limbs.  To  this  list  of 
magic  arts  Isidore  adds  in  the  words  of  Augustine  all  liga- 
tures and  suspensions,  incantations  and  characters,  which 
the  art  of  medicine  condemns  and  which  are  simply  the  work 
of  the  devil.  With  mention  of  the  origin  of  augury  among 
the  Phrygians,  the  discovery  of  praestigium^  which  deceives 
the  eye  by  Mercury,  and  the  revelation  of  aruspicina  by  Ta- 
gus  to  the  Etruscans,  Isidore  closes  the  chapter.  Some  of 
its  items  will  be  found  again  in  his  De  diiferentiis  verborum,^ 
listed  under  the  appropriate  letters  of  the  alphabet.  It  may 
also  be  noted  that  he  briefly  treats  of  transformations  worked 
by  magic  in  the  fourth  chapter  of  the  eleventh  book  of  the 
Etymologies. 

We  turn  to  the  future  influence  of  this  account  of  magic 
which  seems  to  have  been  first  patched  together  by  Isidore. 
Juiceless  as  it  is,  it  seems  to  have  become  a  sort  of  stock  or 
stereotyped  treatment  of  the  subject  with  succeeding  Chris- 
tian writers  down  into  the  twelfth  century.  Somewhat  al- 
tered by  omission  of  poetical  quotations  or  the  insertion  of 
transitional  sentences,  it  was  otherwise  copied  almost  word 
for  word  by  Rabanus  Maurus  (about  784  to  856),  in  his 
De  consanguine orum  nuptiis  et  de  magorum  praestigiis 
falsisque  divinationihus  tractatus,  and  by  Burchard  of 
Worms  and  Ivo  of  Chartres  (died  11 15)  in  their  respective 
collections  of  Decreta,  while  Hincmar  of  Rheims  in  his  De 
divortio  Lotharii  et  Tetbergae  copied  it  with  more  omis- 
sions.^   It  was  also  in  substance  retained  in  the  Decretum  of 


»Migne,   PL  83,  9- 

'For  Rabanus'  account  see 
Migne,  PL  no,  1097-1110;  Bur- 
chard, PL  140,  839  et  seq.;  Ivo, 
PL  161,  760  et  seq.;  Hincmar,  PL 
125,  716-29.  Moreover,  Bur- 
chard continues   to   follow   Raba- 


nus word  for  word  for  some  ten 
columns  after  the  conclusion  of 
their  mutual  excerpt  from  Isi- 
dore, while  Ivo  is  identical  with 
Burchard  for  fifteen  more  col- 
umns. In  "Some  Medieval  Con- 
ceptions of  Magic,"  The  Monist. 


XXVII 


EARLY  MEDIEVAL  LEARNING 


631 


Gratian  in  the  twelfth  century,  when,  too,  Hugh  of  St.  Vic- 
tor probably  made  use  of  it  and  John  of  Salisbury  made  it 
the  basis  of  his  fuller  discussion  of  the  subject.  Isidore's 
account  of  magic,  like  his  discussion  of  many  other  topics, 
sounds  as  if  he  had  ceased  thinking  on  the  subject,  and  it 
must  have  meant  still  less  to  those  who  copied  it.  John  of 
Salisbury  is  the  first  of  them  to  put  any  life  into  the  sub- 
ject and  give  us  any  assurance  that  such  arts  were  still  prac- 
ticed in  his  day.  We  have,  however,  other  evidence  that 
magic  continued  to  be  practiced  in  the  interval.  And  such 
practices  as  the  sortes  sanctorum,  though  included  in  Isi- 


January,  1915,  XXV,  107-39,  I 
stated  (p.  109,  note  2)  that  I 
thought  that  I  was  the  first  to 
point  out  the  identity  of  these 
four  accounts  with  Isidore's. 

Since  then,  however,  I  have  no- 
ticed that  Manitius  (1911),  p.  299, 
notes  the  identity  of  Rabanus 
with  Isidore,  "Dass  Hraban  sich 
auch  sonst  ganz  an  Isidor  anlehnt, 
beweist  er  in  der  Schrift  De  con- 
sanguineorum  nuptiis  im  Ab- 
schnitt  de  magicis  artibus  (Migne, 
109,  I097ff.)  der  aus  Etym.  8,  9 
stammt."  Also  Mr.  C.  C.  I.  Webb, 
in  his  1909  edition  of  the  Poly- 
craticus  notes  John  of  SaUsbury's 
borrowings  from  Isidore  and  Ivo 
of  Chartres.  Finally,  J.  Hansen, 
Zauberwahn,  Inquisition,  und 
Hexenprozess  im  Mittelalter,  1900, 
at  p.  49  notes  that  Isidore's  sketch 
of  the  history  of  magic  keeps  re- 
curring in  medieval  writings,  at 
p.  71  the  dependence  of  Rabanus 
and  Hincmar  upon  Isidore,  and 
perhaps  he  somewhere  notes  the 
identity  with  the  foregoing  of  the 
accounts  of  magic  in  Burchard 
and  the  other  decretalists,  but  in 
the  absence  of  an  index  to  his 
volume  I  do  not  find  such  a  pas- 
sage. At  p.  128,  however,  he 
notes  that  John  of  Salisbury's  de- 
scription of  magic  is  in  part  taken 
word  for  word  from  Isidore  and 
Rabanus. 

Professor  Hamilton,  in  one  of 
his  papers  on  Storm-Making 
Springs,  which  appeared  at  about 


the  same  time  as  my  article  {Ro- 
manic Reznew,  V,  3,  1914;  but, 
owing  probably  to  war  conditions, 
this  issue  did  not  actually  appear 
until  after  the  number  of  The 
Monist  containing  my  article), 
came  near  noting  the  same  thing 
when  he  spoke  (p.  225)  of  Isi- 
dore's chapter  as  "quoted  at 
length"  by  Gratian — who  seems 
to  me,  however,  to  give  the  sub- 
stance of  Isidore's  chapter  rather 
than  his  exact  wording — and 
further  noted  that  four  lines  of 
Latin  which  he  quoted  were  found 
alike  in  Rabanus,  Hincmar,  Ivo, 
and  the  Polycraticus  of  John  of 
Salisbury. 

In  my  article  I  also  stated : 
"Professor  Burr,  in  a  note  to  his 
paper  on  'The  Literature  of 
Witchcraft'  (American  Historical 
Association  Papers,  IV  (1890)2  p. 
241)  has  described  the  accounts 
of  Rabanus  and  Hincmar  but 
without  explicitly  noting  their 
close  resemblance,  although  he 
characterizes  Rabanus'  article  as 
'mainly  compiled.' "  Professor 
Burr  subsequently  wrote  to  me, 
"That  I  did  not  mention  the  re- 
lation in  my  old  paper  on  "The 
Literature  of  Witchcraft"  was 
partly  because  they  borrowed 
from  other  sources  as  well  and 
partly  because  Isidore  is  himself 
a  compiler.  I  hoped  to  come  back 
to  the  matter  in  a  more  careful 
study  of  the  whole  genesis  of 
these  stock  passages." 


632 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Attitude 
to  as- 
trology. 


In  the  De 

natura 

rerum. 


dore's  stock  definition  of  magic,  were  probably  not  generally- 
regarded  as  reprehensible.^ 

Isidore's  repetition  of  the  views  of  the  fathers  concern- 
ing demons  is  so  brief  and  trite  ^  that  we  need  not  further 
notice  it,  but  turn  to  his  attitude  toward  astrology.  We  have 
just  heard  him  associate  astrologers  with  practitioners  of 
the  magic  arts,  but  in  his  third  book  in  discussing  the 
quadrivium  he  states  that  astrology  is  only  partly  supersti- 
tious and  partly  a  natural  science.  The  superstitious  variety 
is  that  pursued  by  the  mathematici  who  augur  the  future 
from  the  stars,  assign  the  parts  of  the  soul  and  body  to  the 
signs  of  the  zodiac,  and  try  to  predict  the  nativities  and 
characters  of  men  from  the  course  of  the  stars.  Such  super- 
stitions "are  without  doubt  contrary  to  our  faith;  Chris- 
tians should  so  ignore  them  that  they  shall  not  even  appear 
to  have  been  written."  Mathesis,  or  the  attempt  to  predict 
future  events  from  the  stars,  is  denounced,  according  to  Isi- 
dore, "not  only  by  doctors  of  the  Christian  religion  but  also 
of  the  Gentiles, — Plato,  Aristotle,  and  others."  Isidore  also 
states  that  there  is  a  distinction  between  astronomy  and  as- 
trology, but  what  it  is,  especially  between  astronomy  and 
natural  astrology,  he  fails  to  elucidate.^ 

In  the  preface  to  his  De  natura  rerum,  which  deals  chiefly 
with  astronomical  and  meteorological  phenomena,  Isidore 
asserts  that  "it  is  not  superstitious  science  to  know  the  na- 
ture of  these  things,  if  only  they  are  considered  from  the 
standpoint  of  sane  and  sober  doctrine."  He  also  states  that 
,his  treatise  is  a  brief  sketch  of  what  has  been  written  by 
the  men  of  old  and  especially  in  the  works  of  Catholics.  In 
it  some  of  the  stock  questions  which  gave  difficulty  to 
Christian  scientists  are  briefly  discussed,  for  instance,  "Con- 
cerning the  waters  which  are  above  the  heavens,"  and 
"Whether  the  stars  have  souls?"  ^     Isidore  rejects  as  "ab- 

*  See  below,  chapter  60  on  Aqui-      astronomy  in  Etymol.,  Ill,  27.  In 
nas.  Etymol.,  Ill,  25,   he   ascribes  the 

'Etymol.,  VIII,  II,  15-17;  Dif-  invention    of    astronomy    to    the 

ferentiarum,  II,  14.  Egyptians   and   that   of   astrology 

*  Indeed,  Differentiarum,  II,  39,  to  the  Chaldeans, 
he    defines    astrology    as    he    had  *  Caps.   14  and  27. 


XXVII  EARLY  MEDIEVAL  LEARNING  633 

surd  fictions"  imagined  by  the  stupidity  of  the  Gentiles  their 
naming  the  days  of  the  week  from  the  planets,  "because  by 
the  same  they  thought  that  some  effect  was  produced  in 
themselves,    saying  that    from   the   sun   they   received   the 
spirit,  from  the  moon  the  body,  from  Mercury  speech  and 
wisdom,    from   Venus   pleasure,    from   Mars    ardor,    from 
Jupiter  temperance,  from  Saturn  slowness."  ^     Yet  later  in 
the  same  treatise  we  find  him  saying  that  everything  in  na- 
ture grows  and  increases  according  to  the  waxing  and  wan- 
ing of  the  moon.^     Moreover,  he  calls  Saturn  a  cold  star 
and  explains  that  the  planets  are  called  errantia,  not  be- 
cause they  wander  themselves  but  because  they  cause  men 
to  err.^     He  also  describes  man  as  a  microcosm,^     Like 
most  ecclesiastical  writers,  no  matter  how  hostile  they  may 
be  to  astrologers,  he  is  ready  to  assert  that  comets  signify 
political  revolutions,  wars,  and  pestilences,^     In  the  Ety- 
mologies he  not  only  attributes  racial  and  temperamental 
differences  among  the  peoples  of  different  regions  to  "force 
of  the  star"  ^  and  "diversity  of  the  sky,"  '^  phrases  which 
seem  to  imply  astrological  influence  rather  than  the  mere 
influence  of  climate  in  our  sense.     He  also  encourages  as- 
trological medicine  when  he  says  that  the  doctor  should 
know  astronomy,  since  human  bodies  change  with  the  qual- 
ities of  the  stars  and  the  change  of  times. ^     Isidore  might 
as  well  have  taken  the  planets  as  signs  in  the  astrological 
sense  as  have  ascribed  to  them  the  absurd  allegorical  sig- 
nificance in  passages  of  Scripture  that  he  did.     He  states 
that  the  moon  is  sometimes  to  be  taken  as  a  symbol  of  this 
world,  sometimes  as  the  church,  which  is  illuminated  by 
Christ  as  the  moon  receives  its  light  from  the  sun,  and  which 
has  seven  meritorious   graces  corresponding  to  the   seven 
forms  of  the  moon.^ 

^De   nat.   rer.,   Ill,   4;    PL   83,  71,  16. 

968.  "EtymoL,  XIV,  5,  "vim  sideris." 

''Ibid.,  XIX,  2.  ''Ibid.,  IX,  2,  "secundum  diver- 

^  Ibid.,  XXII,  2-3.  sitatem   enim  coeli." 

*Ibid.,  IX,  1-2.  'Ibid.,  IV,  13,  4- 

'Ibid.,  XXVI,  15;  EtymoL,  III,  " De  nat.  rcrum,  XVIII,  5-7. 


634  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

Bede's  The  scientific  acquisitions  of  Bede  have  too  often  been 

sdence.  referred  to  in  exaggerated  terms.  Sharon  Turner  said  of 
him,  "He  collected  and  taught  more  natural  truths  with 
fewer  errors  than  any  Roman  book  on  the  same  subjects 
had  accomplished.  Thus  his  work  displays  an  advance, 
not  a  retrogradation  of  human  knowledge;  and  from  its 
judicious  selection  and  concentration  of  the  best  natural 
philosophy  of  the  Roman  Empire  it  does  high  credit  to  the 
Anglo-Saxon  good  sense."  ^  Dr.  R.  L.  Poole  more  mod- 
erately says  of  Bede,  "He  shows  an  extent  of  knowledge  in 
classical  literature  and  natural  science  entirely  unrivalled 
in  his  own  day  and  probably  not  surpassed  for  many  genera- 
tions to  come."  ^  Bede  perhaps  knew  more  natural  science 
than  anyone  else  of  his  time,  but  if  so,  the  others  must  have 
known  practically  nothing;  his  knowledge  can  in  no  sense 
be  called  extensive.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  we  have  evidence 
that  his  extremely  brief  and  elementary  treatises  in  this 
field  were  not  full  enough  tO'  satisfy  even  his  contemporaries. 
In  the  preface  to  his  De  temporum  ratione  ^  he  says  that 
previously  he  had  composed  two  treatises,  De  natura  rerum 
and  De  ratione  temporum,  in  brief  style  as  he  thought  fitting 
for  pupils,  but  that  when  he  began  to  teach  them  to  some 
of  the  brethren,  they  objected  that  they  were  reduced  to  a 
much  briefer  form  than  they  wished,  especially  the  De  tem- 
poribus,  which  Bede  now  proceeds  to  revise  and  amplify. 
It  is  noteworthy  that  in  order  to  fulfill  the  monks'  desire  for 
a  fuller  treatment  of  the  subject  he  found  it  necessary  to  do 
some  further  reading  in  the  fathers.  In  addition  to  Bede's 
own  statement  of  his  aim,  the  frequency  with  which  we 
find  manuscripts  of  early  date  *  of  the  De  natura  rerum  and 

^History  of  the  Anglo-Saxons,  BN  15685,  9th  century;  BN  nouv. 

Ill,  403.  acq.   1612,   1615,  and   1632,  all  9th 

''Illustrations  of  the  History  of  or  loth  century;  Amiens  222,  9th 

Medieval  Thouffht,  1884,  p.  20;  p.  century;    Cambrai    925,    9th    cen- 

18  in  1920  edition.  tH^'y:  J^rea  3,  9th  century ;  Ivrea 

6,   loth  century;  Berlin  128,  8-9th 

Migne,  PL  90,  293-4.  century;    Berlin    130,    9-ioth    cen- 

"A     few     MSS,     chiefly    from  tury;    CLM    18158,    nth  century; 

France,  earlier  than  the  12th  cen-  CLM  21557,  nth  century, 

tury,  are:  BN  5543,  9th  century;  I   have  not  noted  the  MSS  of 


XXVII  EARLY  MEDIEVAL  LEARNING  635 

De  tempofibus  suggests  that  they  were  employed  as  text- 
books in  the  monastic  schools  of  the  early  middle  ages.  As 
the  Carolingian  poet  expressed  it, 

Beda  del  famulus  nostri  didasculus  evi 
Fake  pia  sophie  veterum  sata  lata  peragrans. 

Of  Bede's  Hexaemeron  we  spoke  in  an  earlier  chapter. 
His  chief  extant  genuine  scientific  treatise  is  the  aforesaid 
De  natura  rerum,^  a  very  curtailed  discussion  of  astronomy 
and  meteorology.  It  is  very  similar  to  Isidore's  treatise  of 
the  same  title,  but  is  even  briefer,  omitting  for  the  most 
part  the  mention  of  authorities  and  the  Biblical  quotations 
and  allegorical  applications  which  make  up  a  considerable 
portion  of  Isidore's  brief  work.  One  of  the  few  authorities 
whom  Bede  does  cite  is  Pliny  in  a  discussion  of  the  circles 
of  the  planets.^  Like  Isidore  he  accepts  comets  as  signs 
of  war  and  political  change,  of  tempests  and  pestilence.* 
He  also  states  that  the  air  is  inhabited  by  evil  spirits  who 
there  await  the  worse  torments  of  the  day  of  judgment.* 
In  his  Biblical  commentaries  Bede  briefly  echoes  some  of  the 
views  of  the  fathers  concerning  magic  and  demons,  for  in- 
stance, in  his  treatment  of  the  witch  of  Endor.^ 

Bede  also  translated  into  Latin  a  treatise  on  divination  Divina- 
from  thunder,  perhaps  from  the  works  of  the  sixth  century  t^^nder 
Greek  writer,  John  Lydus.  In  the  preface  to  Herefridus, 
at  whose  request  he  had  undertaken  the  translation,  he  speaks 
of  it  as  a  laborious  and  dangerous  task,  sure  to  expose  him 
to  the  attacks  of  the  invidious  and  detractors  who  will  per- 
haps insinuate  that  he  is  possessed  of  an  evil  spirit  or  is  a 
practitioner  of  magic.  The  three  chapters  of  the  treatise 
give  the  significance  of  thunder  for  the  four  points  of  the 
compass,  the  twelve  months  of  the  year,  and  the  seven  days 
of  the  week.     For  instance,  if  thunder  arises  in  the  east, 

Bede  in  the  British  Museum  and  'Ibid.,  Cap.  24. 

Bodleian  collections.  *  Ibid.,  Cap.  25. 

^  PL  go,  187-278 ;  the  text  occu-  "  In    Sanvuelem    prophetam   al- 

pies  but  a  small  portion  of  these  legorica  expositio,  IV,  7;  PL  91, 

columns.  701. 

^  Ibid.,  Cap.  14. 


636  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

according  to  the  traditions  of  subtle  philosophers  there  will 
be  in  the  course  of  that  year  copious  effusion  of  human 
blood.  Each  signification  is  introduced  with  some  bombas- 
tic phraseology  concerning  the  agile  genius  or  sagacious  in- 
vestigation of  the  philosophers  who  discovered  it.^  Other 
tracts  on  divination  which  were  attributed  to  Bede  are  prob- 
ably spurious  and  will  for  the  most  part  be  considered  later 
in  connection  with  other  treatises  of  the  same  sort.^ 
Riddles  of  Some  interest  in  and  knowledge  of  natural  science  is 

displayed  in  the  metrical  riddles  ^  of  St.  Aldhelm,  abbot  of 
Malmesbury  and  bishop  of  Sherborne,  who  died  in  709,  "the 
first  Englishman  who  cultivated  classical  learning  with  any 
success  and  the  first  of  whom  any  literary  remains  are  pre- 
served." Most  of  them  are  concerned  with  animals,  such 
as  silkworms,  peacock,  salamander,  bee,  swan,  lion,  ostrich, 
dove,  fish,  basilisk,  camel,  eagle,  taxo,  beaver,  weasel, 
swallow,  cat,  crow,  unicorn,  minotaur,  Scylla,  and  elephant; 
or  with  herbs  and  trees,  such  as  heliotrope,  pepper,  nettles, 
hellebore,  and  palm ;  or  with  minerals,  such  as  salt,  adamant, 
and  magnet ;  or  with  terrestrial  and  celestial  phenomena,  such 
as  earth,  wind,  cloud,  rainbow,  moon,  Pleiades,  Arcturus, 
Lucifer,  and  night.  There  is  a  close  resemblance  between 
some  of  these  riddles  and  a  score  of  citations  from  an  Ad- 
helmus  made  in  the  thirteenth  century  by  Thomas  of  Cantim- 
pre  in  his  De  natiira  rerum}     Pitra,^  however,  suggested 

^De  tonitruis  libcllus  ad  Here-  ing  onocentaur  do  not  correspond 

fridum,  PL  90,  609-14.  to   the   riddle  De   monocero  sive 

^  See  below,  chapter  29.  unicorni;    the    two    accounts    of 

*  The  Aenigmatum  Liber  forms  Scylla    are    diflferent;    and    I    do 

a  part  of  the  Liber  de  septenario  not  find  cacus  or  onager  or  harpy 

et  de   metris  in   Aldhelm's  works  or   siren  or  locust  or  the  Indian 

as  edited  by  Giles,  Oxford,  i8z|4,  ants  larger  than  foxes  in  the  Rid- 

and   reprinted    in    Migne,    PL  89,  dies  as  edited  by  Giles. 
183-99.  The  passages  in  which  Thomas 

■*  Cantimpre's    citations    of    Ad-  of   Cantimpre  cites  Adhelmus  are 

helmus      seem     almost     certainly  printed  together  by   Pitra    (1855) 

drawn    from    the    Aenigmata    in  III,  425-7. 

the  cases   of   Leo,  ciconia,  hirun-  °  Pitra   (1855)    III,  xxvi.     Only 

dinus,  nycticorax,  salamander,  lu-  in    the    case    of    the    salamander 

ligo    (or,   loligo),   perna,  dragun-  does  Pitra  say,  "Thomas  hue  ad- 

tia    lapis    (natrix),    myrmicoleon,  duxit       Adhelmi       Shirbrunensis 

colossus,   and   molossus.     On   the  aenigma  de  Salamandra  vatemgue 

other  hand,  the  citations  concern-  a  philosopho  clare  distinxit." 


XXVII  EARLY  MEDIEVAL  LEARNING  637 

that  the  Adhelmus  cited  by  Thomas  of  Cantimpre  was  a 
brother  of  John  the  Scot  of  the  ninth  century. 

The  total  lack  of  originality  and  the  extremely  abbrevi-   Gregory's 

,     ,  .    ,      .    r  •        T  •  •        •       1  Dialogues. 

ated  character  of  the  infrequent  scientmc  writmg  in  the  west 
is  not,  however,  a  fair  example  of  the  total  thought  and 
writing  of  early  medieval  Latin  Christendom,  When  we 
turn  to  the  lives  of  the  saints,  to  the  miracles  recorded  of 
contemporary  monks  and  missionaries,  we  find  that  in  the 
field  of  its  own  supreme  interests  the  pious  imagination  of 
the  time  could  display  considerable  inventiveness  and  was 
by  no  means  satisfied  with  brief  compendiums  from  the 
Bible  and  earlier  Fathers.  Here  too  the  superstition  and 
credulity,  which  had  been  held  back  by  fear  of  paganism  in 
the  case  of  natural  and  occult  science,  ran  luxuriant  riot. 
Such  literature  lies  rather  outside  the  strict  field  of  this  in- 
vestigation, but  it  is  so  characteristic  of  the  Christian  thought 
of  the  period  that  we  may  consider  one  prominent  specimen, 
the  Dialogues  of  Gregory  the  Great,^  pope  from  590  to  604. 
We  shall  sufficiently  illustrate  the  nature  of  this  farrago  of 
pious  folk-lore  by  a  resume  of  the  contents  of  the  opening 
pages  of  the  first  of  its  four  books.  We  need  not  dwell  upon 
the  importance  of  Gregory  in  the  history  of  the  papacy,  of 
monasticism,  and  of  patristic  literature,  further  than  to  em- 
phasize the  point  that  so  distinguished,  influential,  and  for 
his  times  great,  a  man  should  have  been  capable  of  writing 
such  a  book.  Similar  citations  which  might  be  multiplied 
from  other  authors  of  the  period  could  not  add  much  force 
to  this  one  impressive  instance  of  the  naive  pious  credulity 
and  superstition  of  the  best  Christian  minds  of  that  age. 
Not  only  were  the  Dialogues  well  known  throughout  the 
medieval  period  in  the  Latin  reading  world,  but  they  were 
translated  into  Greek  at  an  early  date  and  in  779  from 
that  language  into  Arabic,  while  King  Alfred  made  an 
Anglo-Saxon  translation  of  the  Latin  in  the  closing  ninth 
century. 

*  I  have  used  the  text  in  Migne,  PL  vol.  77. 


638 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


In  the  Dialogues  Gregory  narrates  to  Peter  the  Deacon 
some  of  the  virtues,  signs,  and  marvelous  works  of  saintly 
men  in  Italy  which  he  has  learned  either  by  personal  experi- 
ence or  indirectly  from  the  statements  of  good  and  trust- 
worthy witnesses.  The  first  story  is  of  Honoratus,  the  son 
of  a  colonus  on  a  villa  in  Samnium.  When  the  lad  evinced  his 
piety  by  abstaining  from  meat  at  a  banquet  given  by  his 
parents,  they  ridiculed  him,  declaring  that  he  would  find  no 
fish  to  eat  in  those  mountains.  But  when  the  servant  pres- 
ently went  out  to  draw  some  water,  he  poured  a  fish  out  of 
the  pitcher  upon  his  return  which  provided  the  boy  with 
enough  food  for  the  entire  day.  Subsequently  the  lad  was 
given  his  freedom  and  founded  a  monastery  on  the  spot. 
Still  later  he  saved  this  monastery  from  an  impending  ava- 
lanche by  frequent  calling  upon  the  name  of  Christ  and  use 
of  the  sign  of  the  cross.  By  these  means  he  stopped  the 
landslide  in  mid-course  and  the  rocks  may  still  be  seen  look- 
ing as  if  they  were  sure  to  fall. 

A  tale  follows  of  Goths  who  stole  a  monk's  horse,  but 
found  themselves  unable  to  force  their  own  horses  to  cross 
the  next  river  to  which  they  came  until  they  had  restored 
his  horse  to  the  monk.  In  another  case  where  Franks  came 
to  plunder  this  same  monk,  he  remained  invisible  to  them. 
This  same  monk  was  a  disciple  of  the  afore-mentioned  Hon- 
oratus and  once  raised  a  woman's  child  from  the  dead  by 
placing  upon  its  breast  an  old  shoe  of  his  master  which  he 
cherished  as  a  souvenir.  Thus  he  contrived  to  satisfy  the 
mother's  pleading  and  at  the  same  time  preserve  his  own 
modesty  and  humility.  Gregory  does  not  doubt  that  the 
woman's  faith  also  contributed  to  the  miracle.  Gregory 
adds,  however,  that  he  thinks  the  virtue  of  patience  greater 
than  signs  and  miracles  and  tells  another  story  of  the  same 
monk  to  illustrate  that  virtue. 

We  may  pass  on,  however,  to  the  third  chapter  which 
contains  a  story  of  the  gardener  of  a  monastery  who  set  a 
snake  to  catch  a  thief  who  had  made  depredations  upon  the 
garden,  adjuring  the  snake  as  follows:    'Tn  the  name  of 


XXVII 


EARLY  MEDIEVAL  LEARNING 


639 


Jesus  I  command  you  to  guard  this  approach  and  not  permit 
the  thief  to  enter  here."  The  serpent  obediently  stretched 
its  length  across  the  path,  and  when  the  gardener  returned 
later,  he  found  the  thief  hanging  head  first  from  the  hedge, 
in  which  his  foot  had  caught  as  he  was  climbing  over  it  and 
had  been  surprised  by  the  sight  of  the  serpent.  The  monk  of 
course  then  freely  gave  the  thief  what  he  had  come  to  steal, 
but  also  of  course  gave  him  a  brief  moral  lecture  which  was 
perhaps  less  welcome. 

After  a  brief  account  of  a  miraculous  release  from  sexual 
passion  Gregory  comes  to  a  tale  of  Basilius  the  magician. 
This  is  the  same  man  concerning  whose  arrest  and  trial  on 
the  charge  of  practicing  magic  and  sinister  arts  we  find 
directions  given  in  two  of  the  letters  of  Cassiodorus.^  Ac- 
cording to  Gregory  he  took  refuge  with  the  aid  of  a  bishop 
in  a  monastery,  although  the  abbot  saw  something  diabolical 
about  him  from  the  very  start.  Soon  a  virgin  who  was 
under  the  charge  of  the  monastery  became  so  infatuated 
with  Basilius  as  to  call  publicly  for  him,  declaring  that  she 
should  die  unless  he  came  to  her  aid.  The  abbot  then  ex- 
pelled him  from  the  monastery,  on  which  occasion  Basilius 
confessed  that  he  had  often  by  his  magic  arts  suspended  the 
monastery  in  mid-air  but  that  he  had  never  been  able  to  in- 
jure anyone  who  was  in  it.  This  is  more  detailed  informa- 
tion concerning  the  nature  of  Basilius'  magic  than  Cassi- 
odorus  gives  us.  Gregory  further  adds  that  not  long  after 
Basilius  was  burned  to  death  at  Rome  by  the  zeal  of  the 
Christian  people. 

A  female  servant  of  this  same  monastery  once  ate  a  let- 
tuce in  the  garden  without  making  the  sign  of  the  cross 
first,  and  became  possessed  of  a  demon  straightway.  When 
the  abbot  was  summoned,  the  demon  attempted  to  excuse 
himself,  exclaiming,  "What  have  I  done?  what  have  I 
done  ?  I  was  just  sitting  on  a  lettuce  when  she  came  along 
and  ate  me."  The  abbot  nevertheless  indignantly  proceeded 
to  drive  the  evil  spirit  out  of  his  serf. 

*  Variorum  IV,  Epist.  22-23,  Migne,  PL  69,  624-25. 


640    MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE    chap  xxvii 

Such  are  a  few  specimens  of  the  monkish  magic  that  was 
considered  perfectly  legitimate  and  rapturously  admired  at 
the  same  time  that  men  like  Basilius  were  burned  at  the 
stake  on  charges  of  magic  by  the  zealous  Christian  populace. 

We  may  add  a  word  at  this  point  concerning  Old  Irish 
literature  ^  which,  as  it  has  reached  us,  is  almost  entirely 
religious  in  character,^  produced  and  preserved  by  the  Chris- 
tian clergy.  Yet  we  find  a  number  of  traces  of  magic  in 
these  remains  of  Celtic  learning  and  literature  during  the 
dark  ages.  Indeed,  the  sole  document  in  the  Irish  lan- 
guage which  is  ascribed  to  St.  Patrick  is  a  Hymn  or  incan- 
tation in  which  he  invokes  the  Trinity  and  the  powers  of 
nature  to  aid  him  against  the  enchantments  of  women, 
smiths,  and  wizards.  By  repeating  this  rhythmical  formula 
Patrick  and  his  companions  are  said  to  have  become  invisible 
to  King  Loigaire  and  his  Druids.  The  spell  is  perhaps  as 
old  as  Patrick's  time.  Three  other  incantations  for  urinary 
disease,  sore  eyes,  and  to  extract  a  thorn  are  contained  in 
the  Stowe  Missal.  An  Irish  manuscript  of  the  eighth  or 
ninth  century  in  the  monastery  of  St.  Gall  has  four  spells 
for  similar  purposes  and  another  is  found  in  a  ninth  cen- 
tury codex  preserved  in  Carinthia. 

The  Irish  had  their  Fili  corresponding  somewhat  to  the 
Druids  of  Gaul  or  Britain.  They  were  perhaps  less  closely 
connected  with  heathen  rites,  since  the  church  seems  to  have 
been  less  opposed  to  them  than  to  the  Druids.  They  were 
poets  and  learned  men,  and  a  large  part  of  their  learning,  at 
least  originally,  seems  to  have  consisted  of  magic  and  div- 
ination. There  are  many  instances  in  Irish  literature  of  their 
disfiguring  the  faces  of  their  enemies  by  raising  blotches 
upon  them  by  the  power  of  words  which  they  uttered.  St. 
Patrick  forbade  two  of  their  three  methods  of  divination. 

*  I  derive  the  following  facts  whether  preserved  in  Ireland, 
from  E.  C.  Qiiiggin,  "Irish  Lit-  Scotland,  or  elsewhere,  .  .  .  are 
erature,"  in  EB  V,  622  et  seq.,  all,  or  nearly  all,  of  foreign  ori- 
where  further  bibliography  is  gin" : — Mackinnon,  in  the  Inter- 
given,  national    Congress    of    Medicine^ 

'  "The     Gaelic     medical     MSS,  London,  1913,  p.  413. 


CHAPTER  XXVIII 

ARABIC    OCCULT    SCIENCE    OF    THE    NINTH    CENTURY 

Plan  of  the  chapter — ^Works  of  Alkindi — On  Stellar  Rays,  or  The 
Theory  of  the  Magic  Art — Radiation  of  occult  force  from  the  stars — 
Magic  power  of  words — Problem  of  prayer — Figures,  characters,  and 
sacrifice — Experiment  and  magic — Alkindi's  medieval  influence — 
Divination  by  visions  and  dreams — Weather  prediction — Alkindi  as  an 
astrologer — Alkindi  on  conjunctions — Alkindi  and  alchemy — Astro- 
logical works  of  Albumasar — The  Experiments  of  Albumasar — 
Albumasar  in  Sadan — Book  of  Rains — Costa  ben  Luca's  translation  of 
Hero's  Mechanica — Latin  versions  of  his  Epistle  concerning  Incanta- 
tion— Form  of  the  epistle — Incantations  directly  affect  the  mind  alone 
— Men  imagine  themselves  bewitched — How  are  amulets  effective? — 
Citations  from  the  lapidary  of  the  Pseudo-Aristotle — From  Galen  and 
Dioscorides — Occult  virtue — On  the  Difference  between  Soul  and  Spirit 
— The  nature  of  spiritus — Thought  explained  physiologically — Views  of 
other  medieval  writers — Thebit  ben  Corat — The  Sabians — Thebit's  Re- 
lations to  Sabianism — Thebit  as  encyclopedist,  philosopher,  astronomer 
— His  occult  science — Astrological  and  magic  images — Life  of  Rasis — 
His  232  works — Charlatans  discussed — His  interest  in  natural  science 
— Rasis  and  alchemy — Titles  suggestive  of  astrology  and  magic — 
Conclusion. 

In  this  chapter  we  shall  consider  a  number  of  learned  men  pian 
who  wrote  in  Arabic  or  other  oriental  languages  in  the  ninth  ^jj^^^gj. 
and  early  tenth  century :  Alkindi,  Albumasar,  Costa  ben 
Luca,  Thebit  ben  Corat,  and  Rasis — to  mention  for  the  pres- 
ent only  the  brief  and  convenient  form  of  their  names  by 
which  they  were  commonly  designated  in  medieval  Latin 
learning.  Not  all  of  these  men  were  Mohammedans;  not 
one  was  an  Arab,  strictly  speaking;  but  they  lived  under 
Mohammedan  rule  and  wrote  in  Arabic.  We  shall  note 
especially  those  of  their  works  which  deal  with  occult  science 
and  which  were  plainly  influential  upon  the  later  medieval 
Latin  learning.  Indeed,  most  of  the  works  of  which  we 
shall  treat  seem  to  be  extant  only  in  Latin  translation.    This 

641 


6+2 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Works  of 

Alkindi. 


chapter  aims  at  no  exhaustive  treatment  of  Arabic  science 
and  magic  in  the  ninth  century,  but  merely,  by  presenting 
a  few  prominent  examples,  to  give  some  idea  of  it  and  of 
its  influence  upon  the  middle  ages.  In  subsequent  chapters 
we  shall  have  occasion  to  mention  many  other  such  medieval 
translations  from  Arabic  and  other  oriental  languages. 

One  of  the  great  names  in  tlie  history  of  Arabic  learn- 
ing is  that  of  Alkindi  (Yalcub  ibn  Ishak  ibn  Sabbah  al- 
Kindi),  who  died  about  850  or  873  A,  D.^  Comparatively 
few  of  his  writings  have  come  to  us,  however,  although 
some  two  hundred  titles  prove  that  he  covered  the  whole 
field  of  knowledge  in  his  own  day.  He  translated  the  works 
of  Aristotle  and  other  Greeks  into  Arabic,  and  wrote  upon 
philosophy,  politics,  mathematics,  medicine,  music,  astron- 
omy, and  astrolog}-,  discriminating  little  between  science 
and  superstition  in  his  enthusiasm  for  extensive  knowledge. 
The  first  treatise  of  his  to  appear  in  print  was  an  astrological 
one  on  weather  prediction  in  Latin  translation.^  In  1875  Loth 
printed  an  Arabic  text  of  his  treatise  on  the  theory  of 
conjunctions.  More  recently  Nag}-  has  edited  Latin  versions 
of  some  of  his  philosophical  opuscula,  and  Bjornbo  has 
published  an  optical  treatise  by  him  entitled  De  spectaculis. 
On  Stellar  In  a  manuscript  of  the  closing  fourteenth  century  are 

■^^^y^?^,, ,  contained  several  sets  of  errors  of  Aristotle  and  various 

I  lie  1  neory 

of  the         Arabs,  also  others  condemned  at  Paris  in  1348  and  1363, 
^^    ^ '   dX  Oxford  in  1376.  and  so  on.     Among  these  are  listed  the 


*G.  Flugel,  Alkindi,  genannt  der 
Philosoph  der  Araher,  ein  Vorbild 
seiner  Zeit,  Leipzig,  1857. 

F.  Dieterici,  Die  Naturan- 
scliouung  und  N^aturphilosophie 
der  Araber  im  zehnten  Jahrhun- 
dert,  Berlin,  1861. 

O.  Loth,  Al-Kindi  als  Astrolog. 
in  Morgenldndisehe  Forschungcn. 
Festschrift  fiir  Fleisclter,  Leip- 
zig. 1875.  pp.  263-309. 

A.  Nagy,  Die  philosophischen 
Abhandlungen  des  Al-Kindis, 
1897  in  Beitr'dge  z.  Gesch."  d. 
Philos.  d.  Mittclalt.,  II,  5. 

A.  A.  Bjornbo  and  S.  VogI,  Al- 


kindi, Tidevs,  und  Pseudo-Euclid, 
Drei  Optische  IVerke,  Leipzig, 
1911,  in  Abhandl.  z.  Gesch.  d. 
Math,  ll'iss..  XXVI,  3. 

For  further  bibUography  see 
the  last-named  work  and  Stein- 
schneider   (1905)   23-4,  47,   (1906) 

31-33- 

The  Apology  of  Al  Kindy  (Sir 
Wm.  Muir.  London,  1882)  is  a 
defense  of  Christianity  by  another 
writer  of  about  the  same  time. 

' Astrorum  iudicis  Alkindi,  Ga- 
phar  de  pluviis  imbribus  et  ventis 
ac  aeris  tnutatione,  ex  officina 
Petri  Liech tenstein :   Venetiis,  1507. 


XXVIII 


ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE 


643 


Errors  of  Alkindi  in  the  Magic  Art}  The  allusion  is  to  a 
treatise  by  Alkindi,  variously  styled  The  Theory  of  the 
Magic  Art  or  On  Stellar  Rays,  which  is  found  in  Latin 
version  in  a  number  of  medieval  manuscripts,^  but  v^hich 
has  never  been  published  or  described  at  all  fully. 

Alkindi  begins  the  treatise  by  asserting  the  astrological  Radiation 
doctrine  of  radiation  of  occult  influence  from  the  stars. 
The  diversity  of  objects  in  nature  depends  upon  two  things, 
the  diversity  of  matter  and  the  varying  influence  exerted  by 
the  rays  from  the  stars.  Each  star  has  its  own  peculiar 
force  and  certain  objects  are  especially  under  its  influence, 
while  the  movement  of  the  stars  to  new  positions  and  "the 
colhsion  of  their  rays"  produce  such  an  infinite  variety  of 
combinations  that  no  two  things  in  this  world  are  ever 
found  alike  in  all  respects.     The  stars,  however,  are  not 


*Amplon.  Quarto  151,  fols.  17- 
19. 

'In  the  1412  catalogue  of  Am- 
plonius,  Math.  48  was  "Theorica 
Alkindi  de  radiis  stellicis  seu  ar- 
cium  magicarum  vel  de  phisicis  li- 
gaturis" ;  and  at  present  Amplon. 
Quarto  349,  14th  century,  fols. 
47v,  65V,  66r-v,  i6r-v,  29r,  con- 
tains "Liber  Alkindi  de  radiis 
Omnes  homines  qui  sensibilia  / 
Explicit  theorica  artis  ma^is 
isic).  Explicit  Alkindi  de  radiis 
stellicis." 

Harleian  13,  13th  century,  given 
by  John  of  London  to  St.  Augus- 
tine's Abbey,  Canterbury  (Si  166, 
James,  330-1),  fols.  166-74,  "de 
radiis  stellicis  Omnes  homines 
qui  sensibilia  /  explicit  Theoria 
Artis  Magice  Alkindi." 

Digby  91,  i6th  century,  fols. 
66-80,  Alkindus  de  radiis  stella- 
rum,  "Omnes  homines  qui  sen- 
sibilia sensu  percipiunt.  .  .  ." 

Digby  183,  end  14th  century, 
fols.    38-45. 

Selden  supra  y6  (Bernard  3464), 
fols.  47r-6ov,  "Incipit  theoreita 
artium  magicarum.  Capitulum 
de  origine  scientie.  Omnes  homi- 
nes qui  sensibilia  sensu  percip- 
iunt. .  .  ." ;  Selden  3467,  #4. 

Canon.   Misc.   370,   fols.   240-59, 


"Explicit  theoria  magice  artis 
sive  libellus  Alkindi  de  radiis  stel- 
latis  anno  per  me  Theod.  scriptus 
Domini    1484.  .  .  ." 

Rawlinson  C-117,  15th  century 
(according  to  Macray,  but  since 
the  MS  once  belonged  to  John  of 
London  it  is  more  likely  to  be 
13th  century),  fols.  157-69,  "Incip- 
it theorica  Alkindi  et  est  de 
causis  reddendis  circa  operationes 
karacterum  et  conjurationes  et 
suffumigationes  et  ceteris  huius- 
modi  quae  pertinent  ad  artem 
magicam.  'Omnes  homines  qui 
sensibilia.'  .  .  ." 

BN  nouv.  acq.  616,  1442  A.D., 
Liber  Jacobi  Alchindi  de  radiis. 

CU  Trinity  936  (R.  15,  17)  17th 
century,  Alkyndus  de  Radiis. 

Ste.  Genevieve  2240,  17th  cen- 
tury, fol.  32  (?) — since  the  trea- 
tise is  listed  between  two  others 
which  begin  at  fols.  68  and  112, 
respectively  —  "Alkyndus  de 
radiis ;  de  virtute  verborum." 

Steinschneider  (1906),  22,  has 
already  listed  four  of  these  MSS, 
but  was  mistaken  in  thinking  Cot- 
ton Appendix  VI,  fols.  63v-70r, 
"Explicit  lacob  alkindi  de  theo- 
rica planetarum,"  the  same  trea- 
tise as  The  Theory  of  the  Magic 
Art. 


644  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

the  only  objects  which  emit  rays;  everything  in  the  world 
of  the  elements  radiates  force,  too.  Fire,  color,  and  sound 
are  examples  of  this.  The  science  of  physics  considers  the 
action  of  objects  upon  one  another  by  contact,  but  the  sages 
know  of  a  more  occult  interaction  of  remote  objects  sug- 
gested by  the  power  of  the  magnet  and  the  reflection  of  an 
image  in  a  mirror.  All  such  emanations,  however,  are  in 
the  last  analysis  caused  by  the  celestial  harmony,  which 
governs  by  necessity  all  the  changes  in  this  world.  Thus 
the  men  of  old,  by  experiments  and  by  close  scrutiny  of 
the  secrets  of  both  superior  and  inferior  nature  and  of  the 
disposition  of  the  sky,  came  to  comprehend  many  hidden 
things  in  the  world  of  nature  and  were  able  to  discover 
the  names  of  those  who  had  committed  theft  and  adultery. 
The  bor-  Alkindi  has  thus  prepared  the  reader's  mind  for  the  con- 

between  sideration  of  phenomena  beyond  the  realm  of  ordinary 
science  physical  action.  At  the  same  time  he  has  approached  the 
occult  by  arguing  on  the  analogy  of  natural  phenomena 
and  he  has  laid  down  as  a  fundamental  scientific  premise 
what  we  now  regard  as  a  superstition  of  astrologers.  In 
other  words,  he  is  not  unaware  of  a  difference  in  method 
and  character  between  physics  and  astrology,  between  sci- 
ence and  superstition,  yet  he  tries  to  formulate  a  scientific 
basis  for  what  is  really  a  belief  in  magic. 
Magic  Although  Alkindi  does  not,  as  I  recall,  use  the  word 

of ^ords.  iTiagic,  he  next  argues  in  favor  of  what  is  commonly  called 
the  magic  power  of  words.  He  affirms  that  the  human 
imagination  can  form  concepts  and  then  emit  rays  which  will 
affect  exterior  objects  just  as  would  the  thing  itself  whose 
image  the  mind  has  conceived.  Muscular  movement  and 
speech  are  the  two  channels  by  which  the  mind's  conceptions 
can  be  transformed  into  action.  Frequent  experiments  have 
proven  clearly  the  potency  of  words  when  uttered  in  exact 
accordance  with  imagination  and  intention,  and  when  ac- 
companied by  due  solemnity,  firm  faith,  and  strong  desire. 
The  effect  produced  by  words  and  voices  is  heightened  if 
they  are  uttered  under   favorable  astrological  conditions, 


xxviii  ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE  645 

Some  go  best  with  Saturn,  others  wtih  the  planet  Jupiter, 
some  with  one  sign  of  the  zodiac  and  others  with  another. 
The  four  elements  are  variously  affected  by  different  voices ; 
some  voices,  for  instance,  affect  fire  most  powerfully.  Some 
especially  stir  trees  or  some  one  kind  of  tree.  Thus  by 
words  motion  is  started,  accelerated,  or  impeded;  animal 
life  is  generated  or  destroyed;  images  are  made  to  appear 
in  mirrors;  flames  and  lightnings  are  produced;  and  other 
feats  and  illusions  are  performed  which  seem  marvelous 
to  the  mob. 

Alkindi  even  ventures  to  touch  upon  the  subject  of  Problem 
prayer.  He  states  that  the  rays  emitted  by  the  human  mind  °  ^^^^ 
and  voice  become  the  more  efficacious  in  moving  matter,  if 
the  speaker  has  fixed  his  mind  upon  and  names  God  or 
some  powerful  angel.  Human  ignorance  of  the  harmony 
of  nature  also  often  necessitates  appeal  to  a  higher  power 
in  order  to  attain  good  and  to  avoid  evil.  Faith,  and  ob- 
servance of  the  proper  time  and  place  and  attendant  circum- 
stances have  their  bearing,  however,  upon  the  success  or 
failure  of  prayer  as  well  as  of  other  utterances.  And 
there  are  some  authorities  who  would  exclude  spiritual  in- 
fluence entirely  in  such  matters  and  who  believe  that  words 
and  images  and  prayers  as  well  as  herbs  and  gems  are 
completely  under  the  universal  control  exercised  by  the 
stars. 

The  treatise  concludes  by  discussing  the  virtues  of  fig-  Figures, 
ures,  characters,  images,  and  sacrifices  in  much  the  same  ^nd 
way  as  it  has  treated  of  the  power  of  words.     We  are  as-  sacrifice, 
sured  that  "The  sages  have  proved  by  frequent  experiments 
that  figures  and  characters  inscribed  by  the  hand  of  man  on 
various  materials  with  intention  and  due  solemnity  of  place 
and  time  and  other  circumstances  have  the  effect  of  motion 
upon  external  objects."     Every  such  figure  emits  rays  hav- 
ing the  peculiar  virtue  which  has  been  impressed  upon  it 
by  the  stars  and  signs.     There  are  characters  which  can 
be  employed  to  cure  disease  or  to  induce  it  in  men  or  ani- 
mals.    Images   constructed  in  conformity  with   the   con- 


646 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


stellations  emit  rays  having  something  of  the  virtue  of  the 
celestial  harmony.  Alkindi  also  defends  the  practice  of 
animal  sacrifice.  Whether  God  or  spirits  are  placated  there- 
by or  not,  none  the  less  the  sacrifice  is  efficacious,  if  made 
with  human  intent  and  due  solemnity  and  in  accordance 
with  the  celestial  harmony.  The  star  and  sign  which  are 
dominant  when  any  voluntary  act  of  this  sort  is  begun,  rule 
that  work  to  its  finish.  The  material  and  forms  employed 
should  be  appropriate  to  the  constellation,  or  the  effect  pro- 
duced will  be  discordant  and  perverted. 

It  will  have  been  noted  that  Alkindi  more  than  once 
asserts  that  his  conclusions  have  been  demonstrated  experi- 
mentally. Thus  we  have  one  more  example  of  the  connec- 
tion, supposititious  or  real,  between  magic  and  experimental 
method. 

The  doctrine  here  set  forth  by  Alkindi  of  the  radiation 
of  force  and  his  explanation  of  magic  by  astrology  were 
both  to  be  very  influential  conceptions  in  Latin  medieval 
learning.  We  shall  find  Roger  Bacon,  for  example,  re- 
peating the  same  views  in  almost  the  same  language  con- 
cerning stellar  rays  and  the  power  of  words,  and  it  is 
appropriate  that  in  two  manuscripts  his  utterances  are  placed 
together  with  those  of  Alkindi.-"- 

Alkindi's  treatise  De  somno  et  visione,  as  we  have  it  in 
the  Latin  translation  by  Gerard  of  Cremona,^  accepts  clair- 
voyance and  divination  by  dreams  as  true  and  asks  why  we 
see  some  things  before  they  happen,  why  we  see  other  things 
which  require  interpretation  before  they  reveal  the  future, 
and  why  at  other  times  we  foresee  the  contrary  of  what  is 
to  be.^     His  answer  is  that  the  mind  or  soul  has  innate 


*  In  Digby  91  Roger  Bacon  on 
Perspective  is  followed  by  Al- 
kindi on  the  rays  of  the  stars, 
while  in  Digby  183  a  marginal 
note  to  Alkindi's  treatise  reads 
"Nota  hoc  quod  est  extractum  de 
libro  Rogeri  Bakun  de  celo  et 
mundo,  capitulo  de  numero  celo- 
rum,"  and  following  the  work 
of  Alkindi  we  have  Bacon  on  the 


retardation  of  old  age  and  per- 
haps also  de  radiis  solaribus. 

»  Edited  by  Nagy  ( 1897) .  A  MS 
of  the  late  12th  or  early  13th  cen- 
tury which  Nagy  fails  to  note  is 
Digby  40,  fols.  iSv-25,  de  somno 
et  visionibus. 

'  Nagy,  p.  18,  "Quare  autem  vi- 
deamus  quasdam  res  antequam 
sint?  et  quare  videamus  res  cum 


XXVIII 


ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE 


647 


natural  knowledge  of  these  things,  and  that  "it  is  itself 
the  seat  of  all  species  sensible  and  rational."  Vision  is 
when  the  soul  dismisses  the  senses  and  employs  thought, 
and  the  formative  or  imaginative  virtue  of  the  mind  is  more 
active  in  sleep,  the  sensitive  faculties  when  one  is  awake. 

While  by  some  persons,  at  least,  opinions  of  Alkindi  in 
his  Theory  of  the  Magic  Art  were  regarded  as  erroneous, 
Albertus  Magnus  in  his  Speculum  astronomiae  listed 
among  works  on  judicial  astrology  with  which  he  thought 
that  the  church  could  find  no  fault  "a  book  of  Alchindi" 
which  opened  with  the  words  Rogatiis  fui}  This  is  a 
work  on  weather  prediction  which  still  exists  in  a  number 
of  manuscripts  ^  and  was  printed  in  1 507  at  Venice,  and  in 
1540  at  Paris,  together  with  a  treatise  on  the  same  theme 
by  Albumasar,  of  whom  we  shall  say  more  presently.^ 


interpretatione  significantes  res 
antequam  sint?  et  quare  videamus 
res  facientes  nos  videre  contra- 
rium   earum?" 

"  Spec,  astron.  cap.  7.  Mora 
fully  the  Incipit  is,  "Rogatus 
fui  quod  manifestem  consilia  phil- 
osophorum.  .  .  ." 

"  Digby  68,  14th  century,  f  ols. 
124-35,  Liber  Alkindii  de  impres- 
sionibus  terre  et  aeris  accidentibus. 
CU  Clare  College  15  (Kk.  4,  2), 
c.  1280,  fols.  8-13,  "In  nomine  dei 
et  eius  laude  Epistola  Alkindi  de 
rebus  aeribus  et  pluviis  cum  ser- 
mone  aggregate  et  utili  de  arabico 
in  latinum  translata." 

Steinschneider  (1906)  32  gives 
the  title  as  De  imprcssionibus 
aeris,  and  suggests  that  it  is  the 
same  as  a  De  pluviis  or  De 
nubibus,  which  seems  to  be  the 
case,  as  they  have  the  same  In- 
cipit— Steinschneider  (1905)  13 — 
as  does  a  De  imbribus  in  Digby 
176,  14th  century,  fols.  61-63. 
Steinschneider  also  suggested  that 
BN  7332,  De  imprcssionibus 
planetarum  was  probably  the 
same  treatise;  and  this  is  shown 
to  be  true  by  the  Explicit  of  Al- 
kindi's  treatise  in  another  MS, 
Cotton  Appendix  VI,  fol.  6j,w, 
"Explicit    liber    de   imprcssionibus 


planetarum  secundum  iacobum  al- 
kindi." See  also  BN  7316,  7328, 
7440,  7482.  _ 

The  opening  words  of  an  anony- 
mous Tractatus  de  meteorolo- 
gia  in  Vienna  2385,  13th  century, 
fols.  46-49,  show  that  it  is  the 
Alkindi.  A  very  similar  treatise 
on  weather  prediction,  De  subra- 
diis  planetarum  or  De  pluviis, 
is  ascribed  to  Haly  and  exists  in 
three  Digby  MSS  (67,  fol.  I2v; 
93,  fol.  183V;  147,  fol.  ii7v)  and 
in  some  other  MSS  noted  by 
Steinschneider.  It  belongs,  I 
suspect,  together  with  a  brief 
Haly  de  dispositione  aeris  (Dig- 
by  92,  fol.  5)  which  Steinschnei- 
der listed  separately. 

^  Some  notion  of  the  number 
of  these  astrological  treatises  on 
the  weather  may  be  had  from  the 
following  group  of  them  in  a 
single  MS. 

Vienna  2436,  14th  century, 
fols.     134-6,     "Finitur     Hermanni 
liber   de  ymbribus   et   pluviis" 
136-8,  lohannes  Hispalensis,  Trac- 
tatus de  mutatione  aeris 

139,  Haomar  de  pluviis 

139-40,  Idem  de  qualitate  aeris  et 
temporum 

140,  de   pluvia,   fulgure,   tonitruis 
et  vento 


on  con- 
junctions. 


648  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

Alkindi  A  majority,  indeed,  of  the  works  by  Alkindi  extant  in 

astrologer.  Latin  translation  are  astrological.^  Several  were  translated 
by  Gerard  of  Cremona,  and  one  or  two  by  John  of  Spain 
and  Robert  of  Chester,^  Geomancies  are  attributed  to 
Alkindi  in  manuscripts  at  Munich.^  Loth  notes  concern- 
ing Alkindi's  astrology  what  we  have  already  found  to  be 
the  case  in  his  theories  of  radiation  and  magic  art  and  of 
divination  by  dreams;  namely,  that  while  he  believes  in 
astrology  unconditionally,  he  tries  to  pursue  it  as  a  science 
in  a  scientific  way,  observing  mathematical  method  and 
physical  laws — as  they  seemed  to  him — while  he  attacked 
the  vulgar  superstitions  which  were  popularly  regarded  as 
astrology. 
Alkindi  The   astrological   treatise   by   Alkindi,   of  which  Loth 

edited  the  Arabic  text,  is  a  letter  on  the  duration  of  the 
empire  of  the  Arabs.  This  bit  of  political  prediction  was, 
as  far  as  Loth  knew,  the  first  instance  of  the  theory  of 
conjunctions  in  Arabian  astrology.  The  theory  was  that 
lesser  conjunctions  of  the  planets,  which  occur  every  twenty 
years,  middling  conjunctions  which  come  every  two  hun- 
dred and  forty  years,  and  great  conjunctions  which  occur 
only  every  nine  hundred  and  sixty  years,  exert  a  great  in- 
fluence not  only  upon  the  world  of  nature  but  upon  po- 
litical and  religious  events,  and,  especially  the  great  con- 
junctions, open  new  periods  in  history.  Thus,  as  Loth  says, 
the  conjunction  is  for  the  macrocosmos  what  the  horoscope 
is  for  man  the  microcosmos ;  the  one  forecasts  the  fate  of 

140-1,  Dorochius,  De  hora  pluvie  Achalis   de   Baldac   philosophi   de 

et  ventorum  caloris  et  f  rigoris  f  uturorum  scientia  ;  Corpus  Chris- 

141,  Idem,  De  hora  pluvie  ti  254,  fol.  191,  "de  aspectibus" — 
141-2,   Alkindus,   alias   Dorochius,  a  fragment  from   a   14th   century 

De  aeris  qualitatibus  MSS. 

142,  Idem,  De  imbribus  *  MSS    of    Robert's    translation 

143,  Jergis,  De  pluviis  of  Alkindi's  Judgments  are  nu- 
198,  206,  lacobus  Alkindus,  Liber       merous    in   the    Bodleian   library : 

de     significationibus     planeta-  Digby  91,  fol.  80-;  Ashmole   179; 

rum    et    eorum    naturis,    alias  209;  369;  434;  and  extracts  from 

de  pluviis."  it     in     other     MSS.       It     opens, 

*  Their     titles      are     listed     by  "Quamquam  post  Euclidem." 

Steinschncider     (1906)     99;    31-3.  ^  CLM    392,    15th    century,    fol. 

We  may  note  EN  6978,  14th  cen-  80-;  489,  i6th  century,  fols,  207-21. 

tury,      Incipit      epistola      Alkindi 


XXVIII 


ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE 


649 


the  individual ;  the  other,  that  of  society.  Loth  knew  of  no 
Latin  translation  of  Alkindi's  letter,  and  medieval  writers  in 
Latin  cite  Albumasar  usually  as  their  authority  on  the  sub- 
ject of  conjunctions.  But  Loth  held  that  Albumasar,  who 
was  a  pupil  of  Alkindi,  merely  developed  and  popularized 
the  astrological  theories  of  his  master,  and  Loth  showed  that 
Albumasar  embodied  our  letter  on  the  duration  of  the 
Arabian  empire  in  large  part  in  his  work  On  Great  Con- 
junctions without  mentioning  Alkindi  as  his  authority. 

Although  a  believer  in  astrology  to  the  point  of  magic,  Alkindi 
and  not  unacquainted  with  metals  as  his  work  On  the  Prop-  alchemy. 
erties  of  Swords  shows,  Alkindi  regarded  the  art  of  alchemy 
as  a  deception  and  the  pretended  transmutation  of  other 
metals  into  gold  as  false.^  He  affirmed  this  especially  in  his 
treatise  entitled.  The  Deceits  of  the  Alchemists,  but  also  in 
his  other  writings.^ 

Something  further  should  be  said  concerning  the  Astrologi- 
astrological  treatises  of  Albumasar  (Abu  Ma'shar  Ja'far  of  Albu-^ 
ben  Muhammad  al-Balkhi)  whence  also  his  briefer  appella-  ™asar. 
tions,  Japhar  and  D ja'far.  He  died  in  886  and  has  been 
called  the  most  celebrated  of  all  the  ninth  century  Bagdad 
astrologers,  although  he  has  also  been  accused  of  plagiarism, 
as  we  have  seen.  In  1489  at  Augsburg  Erhard  Ratdolt 
published  three  of  his  works,  the  Greater  Introduction  to 
Astronomy  in  eight  books,  the  Flowers — which  Roger  Bacon 
cites  as  severely  condemning  physicians  who  do  not  study 
astrology  ^ — and  the  eight  books  concerning  great  con- 
junctions and  revolutions  of  the  years.  Of  these  the  Intro- 
duction was  translated  both  by  John  of  Spain  and  Hermann 
of  Dalmatia,  but  the  former  translation,  although  found  in 
many  manuscripts,  remains  unprinted.  The  Flores  is  found 
in  numerous  manuscripts  and  was  reprinted  in  1495.     The 


'O.  Loth  (187s),  pp.  271-2;  at 
280-2  he  gives  the  Latin  of  the 
passage  in  question  from  Albu- 
masar, following  the  Arabic  of 
Alkindi   at  273-9. 

*  E.   Wiedemann    in   Journal  f. 


praktische  Chemic,  1907,  p.  y3. 
et  seq.;  cited  by  Lippmann  (1919) 
p.  399- 

^  Bridges,    Opus   Mains,   I,   262, 
note. 


6so 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


work  on  conjunctions  and  revolutions  was  printed  again  in 
15 1 5  and  also  exists  in  many  manuscripts.^  A  French  trans- 
lation which  Hagins  the  Jew,  working  for  Henri  Bate  of 
Malines,  made  in  1273  of  "Le  livre  des  revolutions  de 
siecle,"  of  whose  six  chapters  he  translated  only  four,^ 
probably  applied  to  a  part  of  this  work. 

Albertus  Magnus  in  the  Speculum  astronomiae,  in  listing 
irreproachable  works  of  astronomy  and  astrology,  mentions 
a  "Book  of  Experiments"  by  Albumasar  instead  of  the  Con- 
junctions and  Revolutions  along  with  his  Flowers  and  Intro- 
duction.^ This  book  of  experiments  by  Albumasar  is  often 
met  with  in  the  manuscripts.  It  is  a  different  and  shorter 
work  than  that  in  eight  parts  on  Conjunctions,  but  itself 


^  Steinschneider  (1905),  p.  47. 

"  HL  21,  499-503. 

^Spec.  astron.  cap.  6.  He  gives 
the  Incipit  of  the  Experiments  of 
Albumasar  as  "Scito  horam  introi- 
tus"  which  serves  to  identify  it 
with  the  following : 

Amplon.  Quarto  365,  12th  cen- 
tury, fols.  1-18,  liber  experimen- 
torum. 

Ashmole  369-V,  13th  century, 
fols.  103-23V,  ".  .  .  .  incipit  liber 
in  revolutione  annorum  mundi. 
Perfectus  est  liber  experimento- 
rum  .  .  ." 

Ashmole  393,  isth  century,  fol. 
95v,  "Item  Albumasar  de  revolu- 
tionibus  annorum  mundi  sive  de 
experimentis  .  .  ." 

BN  16204,  13th  century,  pp.  302- 
333.  "Revolutio  annorum  mundi 
.  .  .  Perfectus  est  liber  experi- 
mentorum  Albumasar  .  .  ." 

Arsenal  880,  15th  century,  fol.  i-. 

Arsenal  1036,  14th  century,  fol. 
1 04V. 

Dijon  1045,  iSth  century,  fol. 
81-. 

Other  MSS  containing  Experi- 
ments of  Albumasar  but  where  I 
am  not  sure  of  the  wording  of 
the  Incipit  are : 

Laud.  Misc.  594,  I4-I5th  cen- 
tury, fol.  123-,  Liber  experimen- 
torum. 

Harleian  i,  fols.  31-41,  de  ex- 
perimentis in  revolutione  anno- 
rum mundi. 


CLM  SI,  1487,  and  1503. 

Vienna  2436,  14th  century,  fol- 
lowing John  of  Spain's  translation 
of  the  Introductorium  magnum  at 
fols.  1-85  and  a  Liber  magnarum 
coniunctionum  at  fols.  144-98, 
comes  at  fol.  242,  "Liber  experi- 
mentorum  seu  Capitula  stellarum 
oblata  regi  magno  Sarracenorum 
ab  Albumasore."  The  Incipit 
here  is  "Dispositio  est  ut  dicam 
ab  ariete  sic  initium"  but  the 
treatise  is  incomplete. 

In  some  MS  at  Oxford  which 
I  cannot  now  identify  the  Flores 
of  Albumasar  close  with  the  state- 
ment that  the  book  of  Experi- 
ments will  follow.  A  different 
hand  then  adds  "The  following 
work  is  Albumazar  on  the  revo- 
lutions of  years,"  while  a  third 
hand  adds  the  explanation,  "And 
according  to  some  authorities  it 
and  the  book  of  experiments  are 
one,"  which  is  the  case. 

In  some  MSS,  however,  another 
treatise  on  revolutions  accom- 
panies the  Experiments.  In 
Amplon.  Quarto  365  it  is  fol- 
lowed at  fols.  18-27  by  Sentencie 
de  revolucione  annorum,  while  in 
Laud.  Misc.  594  it  is  preceded  at 
fol.  106  by  Liber  Albumasar  de 
revolutionibus  annorum,  collectus 
a  Aoribus  antiquorum  philosopho- 
rum,  which  is  the  same  as  the 
Flores. 


XXVIII 


ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE 


6si 


deals  with  the  subject  of  revolutions.  It  is  not,  however, 
to  be  confused  with  still  another  work  by  Albumasar  on 
revolutions  as  connected  with  nativities.^ 

Another  work  on  astrology  with  which  the  name  of  Albu- 
Albumasar  is  connected  is  cited  by  medieval  writers,  notably  Sadan^^ 
Peter  of  Abano,^  as  Albumasar  in  Sadan  (or  Sadam), 
and  is  also  found  in  Latin  manuscripts  where  it  is  also 
called  "Excerpts  from  the  Secrets  of  Albumasar."  ^  Stein- 
schneider  regarded  the  Latin  translation  as  a  shortened  or 
incomplete  version  of  an  Arabic  original  entitled  al-Mudsa- 
karef,  or  Memorabilia  by  Abu  Sa'id  Schadsan,  who  wrote 
down  the  answers  of  his  teacher  to  his  questions."*  There 
is  also  a  Greek  text,  entitled  Mysteries,  which  differs  con- 
siderably from  the  Latin  and  of  which  Sadan  perhaps  made 
use.^  The  Latin  version  might  be  described  as  a  miscel- 
laneous collection  of  astrological  teachings,  anecdotes,  and 
actual  cases  of  Albumasar  gathered  up  by  his  disciples  and 
somewhat  resembling  Luther's  Table-Talk  in  form. 

We  have  already  alluded  to  the  treatise  on  weather  pre-   Book  of 
diction  by  Albumasar  which  was  printed  with  a  similar   *'^*"'^- 


'  The  distinction  between  these 
various  works  is  made  quite  clear 
in  BN  16204,  13th  century,  where 
at  pp.  1-183  is  John  of  Spain's 
translation  of  the  Liber  introduc- 
torius  maior  in  eight  parts ;  at 
183-302  the  Conjunctions,  also  in 
eight  parts ;  at  302-333  the  Revo- 
lutio  annorutn  mundi  or  Liber 
experitncntorum ;  at  333-353  the 
Flores,  and  at  353-369  the  De  revo- 
lutione  annorutn  in  revolutione 
nattT/itatum,  which  opens  "Omne 
tentpus  breve  est  operandi  .  .  .  " 
At  the  same  time  the  Explicit  of 
this  treatise  bears  witness  to  the 
ease  with  which  these  works  of 
Albumasar  are  confused,  for  it 
was  at  first  written,  "Explicit  liber 
albumcLsar  de  revolutione  anno- 
rutn tnundi,"  and  some  other  hand 
has  crossed  out  this  last  word  and 
substituted  "natizntatis." 

'Conciliator,  Diff.  156. 

'Laud.  Misc.  594,  i4-i5th  cen- 
tury, fols.  137-41,  Liber  Sadan,  sive 


Albumasar  in  Sadan.  "Dixit 
Sadan,  Audivi  Albumayar  dicen- 
tem  quod  omnis  vita  viventium 
post  Deum  est  sol  et  luna  / 
Expliciunt  excerpta  de  secretis 
Albumasar." 

Cat.  cod.  astrol.  Graec.  V,  i, 
142,  quotes  from  a  15th  century 
MS,  "Expliciunt  excerpta  de  sec- 
retis Albumasaris  per  Sadan  dis- 
cipulum  cuius  (eius?)  et  vocatur 
liber  Albumasaris  in   Sadan." 

The  treatise,  according  to 
Steinschneider  (1906),  36-8,  is 
also  found  in  Amplon.  Quarto  352. 

CLM  826,  14th  century,  written 
and  illuminated  in  Bohemia,  fols. 
27-Z2,  Tractatus  de  nativitatibus, 
"Dixit  Zadan :  audivi  Albumazar 
dicentem  .  .  .'[ 

■"Steinschneider    (1906),  36-38. 

"  Cat.  cod.  astrol.  Graec.  V,  1, 
142.  In  Vienna  MS  10583,  15th 
century,  99  fols.,  we  find  a  "de 
revolutionibus  nativitatum"  by 
Albumasar  "greco  in  latinum." 


652  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

work  by  Alkindi  in  1507  and  1540,  and  also  often  accom- 
panies it  in  the  manuscripts.  In  this  "book  of  rains  accord- 
ing to  the  Indians"  ^  Albumasar  is  variously  disguised 
under  the  names  of  Gaphar,  Jafar,  and  lafar  and  is  called 
an  Indian,  Egyptian,  or  Babylonian.^  In  his  Latin  transla- 
tion of  it  Hugo  Sanctellensis  tells  his  patron,  the  "antistes 
Michael"  that  the  treatise  was  written  by  Gaphar,  an  ancient 
astrologer  of  India,  and  has  since  been  abbreviated  by  a 
Tillemus  or  Cilenius  or  Cylenius  Mercurius.^  To  Japhar  is 
also  attributed  a  Minor  Isagoga  to  astronomy  in  seven  lec- 
tures or  sernwnes,  which  Adelard  of  Bath  is  said  to  have 
translated  from  the  Arabic.^ 

We  turn  next  to  Costa  ben  Luca,  or  Qusta  ibn  Luqa,  of 
Baalbek,  and  especially  to  his  treatise  On  Physical  Ligatures, 
or  more  fully,  The  Epistle  concerning  Incantations,  Adjura- 
tions, and  Suspensions  from  the  Neck.  The  scientific  im- 
portance of  Costa  ben  Luca  may  be  seen  from  the  circum- 
stance that  the  Mechanica  of  Hero  of  Alexandria,  of  which 
the  Greek  text  is  for  the  most  part  lost,  has  been  preserved 
in  the  Arabic  translation  which  Costa  prepared  in  862-866 

*  BN    7316,    15th    century,    #13,  iudicia  prout  Indorum  .  .  ." 

liber  imbrium  secundos  Indos  ...  ^  The  text  printed   in   1507  and 

authore   Jafar;   so  too   BN   7329,  1540    is    Hugo's    translation.      So 

15th    century,    #6;    BN    7316    S16,  is    Bodleian    463    (Bernard    2456) 

de     mutatione    temporum     secun-  14th    century,    fols.    2or-24r,    "In- 

dum  Indos,  seems,  however,  to  be  cipit  liber  imbrium  editum  a  lafar 

another     anonymous     treatise     on  astrologo     et     a     lenio     et     mer- 

the    same    subject.      Perhaps    the  curio    (Cilenio   Mercurio)    correc- 

following,   although   not   so   listed  to."    See  also  Savile  15    (Bernard 

in  the  catalogue,  is  by  Albumasar.  6561),   Liber  imbrium  ab  antiquo 

Digby  194,  fol.  147V-  "Sapientes  Indorum    astrologo   nomine  Jafar 

Indi  de  pluviis  indicant  secundum  editus,  deinde  a  Cylenio  Mercurio 

lunam,  considerantes   ipsius   man-  abbreviatus. 

siones   /   quum   dominus   aspectus  ■•  Digby    68,     14th    century,    fol. 

aspicit    dominum    vel    est    ei    con-  116-  "Ysagoga  minor  Japharis  ma- 

junctus."  thematici  in  astronomiam  per  Ad- 

^  Corpus     Christi     233,     I3-I5th  helardum    Bathoniencem   ex   Ara- 

century,    fol.    122-    "Japhar  philo-  bico   sumpta.    Quicunque  philoso- 

sophi  ct  astrologi  Aegyptii.     Cum  phie     scienciam     altiorem     studio 

multa  et  varia  de  nubium  congre-  constanti   inquireris  .  .  ." 

gatione    precepta    Indorum    traxit  Sloane    2030,    fols.    83-86V,    ac- 

auctoritas  .  .  ."  cording     to     Haskins     in     EHR 

Cod.     Cantab.     Ii-I-13,     "Incipit  (1913),  but  my  notes,  which  it  is 

liber    Gaphar   de    temporis    muta-  now    too    late    to   verify,    suggest 

tione    qui    dicitur    Geazar    Babilo-  that   it    is   a    fragment    occupying 

niensis.       Universa      astronomiae  less  than  a  page  at  fol.  87. 


XXVIII 


ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE 


653 


for  the  caliph  al-Musta.  Several  manuscripts  of  this  Arabic 
text  are  still  extant  at  Cairo,  Constantinople,  Leyden,  and 
London,  and  it  has  been  twice  printed.^ 

The  vi^ork  in  which  we  are  more  especially  interested  has   Latin  ver- 
also  been  printed  in  editions  of  the  works  of  Galen,  of  Con-   l\^^^  9^ , 

.  '  •         his  Eptstle 

stantinus  Africanus,  of  Arnald  of  Villanova,  and  of  Henry 
Cornelius  Agrippa.^  The  treatise  is  also  attributed  to  Rasis 
in  the  library  at  Montpellier.^  Its  inclusion  among  Galen's 
works  is  a  manifest  error;  in  the  edition  of  Agrippa  it  is 
appended  as  The  Letter  of  an  Unknown  Author  (Epistola 
incerti  authoris)  ;  while  Arnald  is  represented  as  translating 
the  work  from  Greek — a  language  of  which  he  was  ignorant 
— into  Latin.  He  could  read  Arabic,  however,  and  per- 
haps rendered  the  treatise  from  that  language.*  But  it  had 
certainly  been  translated  before  his  time,,  the  end  of  the  thir- 
teenth century,  and  presumably  by  Constantinus  Africanus, 
cioi 5-1087,  since  it  not  merely  appears  in  his  printed  works 
but  is  found  together  with  an  imperfect  copy  of  his  Pantegni 
in  a  manuscript  of  the  twelfth  century.^  In  a  fifteenth  cen- 
tury manuscript  Unayn  or  Honein  ben  Ishak  is  named  as 
the  author  of  our  treatise,  but  this  seems  to  be  a  mistake.® 
Albertus  Magnus  in  the  middle  of  the  thirteenth  century 
cites  our  treatise  both  in  his  Vegetables  and  Plants,'^  where 
he  alludes  to  "the  books  of  incantations  of  Hermes  the 
philosopher  and  of  Costa  ben  Luca  the  philosopher,  and  the 
books  of  physical  ligatures,"  and  in  his  Minerals,^  where 


*  By  Carra  de  Vaux  in  lournal 
asiatique,  pe  scrie,  I,  386,  II,  152, 
420,  with  a  French  translation ; 
and  by  Nix,  Leipzig,  1900,  with 
a  German  translation,  also  printed 
separately    in    1894. 

^  Galen,  ed.  Chart.  X,  571 ;  Con- 
stantinus Africanus,  ed.  Basel, 
1536,  pp.  317-21 ;  Arnald  of  Vil- 
lanova, Opera.  Lyons,  1532,  fol. 
295,  and  also  in  other  editions  of 
his  works ;  H.  C.  Agrippa,  Occult 
Philosophy,  Lyons,  1600,  pp.  637- 
40. 

"HL  XXVIII,  78-9. 

*  Idem. 

"Additional  22719,  12th  century, 


fol.  200V,  "Quesivisti  fili  karissime 
de  incantatione  adjuratione  cplli 
suspensione  .  .  ."  In  view  of  tkis 
and  the  citations  of  the  work  by 
Albertus  Magnus  who  wrote  be- 
fore Arnald  of  Villanova,  I  can- 
not agree  with  Steinschneider 
(1905),  pp.  6  and  12,  in  denying 
that  Constantinus  translated  the 
work  and  in  ascribing  the  trans- 
lation exclusively  to  Arnald. 

"Florence  II,  III,  214,  15th 
century,  fols.  72-4,  "Liber  Unayn 
de  incantatione.  Quesisti  fili  karis- 
sime .  .  ." 

'  De  vegetahilibus,  V,  ii,  6. 

^Mineral.  II,  ii,  7,  and  II,  iii,  6. 


654 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Form 
of  the 
epistle. 


Incanta- 
tions 
directly 
afifect 
the  mind 
alone. 


the  Liber  de  ligaturis  physicis,  as  he  calls  it,  is  the  source 
whence  he  has  borrowed  statements  concerning  gems  as- 
cribed to  Aristotle  and  Dioscorides. 

Our  treatise  is  in  the  form  of  a  reply  by  Costa  ben  Luca 
to  someone  whom  he  addresses  as  "dearest  son"  and  who 
has  asked  him  what  validity  there  is  in  incantations,  adjura- 
tions, and  suspensions  from  one's  neck,  and  what  the  books 
of  the  Greeks  and  Indians  have  to  say  upon  these  matters. 
The  wording  of  Costa's  epistle  varies  considerably  in  the 
printed  editions  owing  probably  to  careless  interpretation 
of  the  manuscripts  or  careless  copying  by  the  earlier  scribes, 
but  its  general  tenor  is  the  same. 

Costa  first  affirms  that  all  the  ancients  have  agreed  that 
the  virtue  of  the  mind  affects  the  state  of  the  body.  Galen 
in  particular  is  cited  as  to  the  effect  of  passions  upon  health 
and  the  advisability  of  the  physician's  cheering  the  minds 
of  gloomy  patients  even  by  resort  to  deception  to  a  limited 
extent,  if  it  seems  necessary.  A  perfect  mind  generally  goes 
with  a  perfect  body  and  an  imperfect  mind  with  an  imper- 
fect body,  as  is  seen  in  the  case  of  children,  old  men,  and 
women,  or  in  the  inhabitants  of  the  intemperate  zones, 
either  torrid  Ethiopia  or  the  frozen  north.  Here  one  text 
specifies  Scotland  (Scotie)  ;  another,  Schytie,  which  is  per- 
haps intended  for  Scythia.  Costa  therefore  argues  that  if 
anyone  believes  that  an  incantation  will  help  him,  he  will  at 
least  be  benefited  by  his  own  confidence.  And  if  a  person  is 
constantly  afraid  that  incantations  may  be  directed  against 
him,  he  may  easily  fret  himself  into  a  fever.  This,  Costa 
thinks,  was  what  Socrates  had  in  mind  when  he  described 
incantations  as  "words  deceiving  rational  souls  by  their  in- 
terpretation or  by  the  fear  they  produce  or  by  despair." 
According  to  Albertus  Magnus,  who  embodies  a  good  deal 
of  Costa's  Epistle  in  his  Minerals,  Socrates  said  more  fully 
that  incantations,  or  perhaps  better,  enchantments,  were 
made  in  four  ways,  namely,  by  suspending  or  binding  on 
objects,  by  imprecations  or  adjurations,  by  characters,  and 
by  images;  and  that  they  dement  rational  souls  so  that  they 


XXVIII  ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE  655 

fall  into  fear  and  despair  or  rise  to  joy  and  confidence;  and 
that  through  these  accidents  of  the  mind  bodies  are  altered 
either  in  the  direction  of  heahh  or  of  chronic  infirmity.^ 
Costa  states  that  the  medical  men  of  India  believe  that  in- 
cantations and  adjurations  are  beneficial.  But  he  says  noth- 
ing to  indicate  that  they,  much  less  the  Greeks  or  himself, 
have  faith  in  the  efficacy  of  incantations  or  words  to  work 
changes  in  matter  per  se  or  directly,  nor  does  he  say  any- 
thing to  indicate  that  demons  may  be  summoned  and  given 
orders  by  this  method.  Perhaps  his  discussion  of  incanta- 
tions is  a  trifle  constrained  and  not  sufficiently  outspoken, 
but  it  is  moderate  and  scientific  and  shows  a  fair  degree  of 
scepticism  for  that  period,  especially  when  we  compare  it 
with  Alkindi's  attitude  towards  the  power  of  words. 

Costa  ben  Luca's  attitude  towards  sorcery  seems  the   Men 
same  as  towards  incantations.     He  concludes  his  discussion   [^itm^ 
of  this  point  by  a  story  of  "a  certain  great  noble  of  our    selves  be- 
country"  who  had  convinced  himself  that  he  had  been  be- 
witched and  consequently  became  impotent.     After  vainly 
endeavoring  to  convince  him  that  this  was  simply  due  to 
his  imagination,  Costa  decided  that  there  was  nothing  to 
do  but  humor  him  in  his  delusion.     He  therefore  showed 
him  a  passage  in  The  Book  of  Cleopatra  which  prescribed 
as  an  aphrodisiac  the  anointing  of  the  entire  body  with  the 
gall  of  a  crow  mixed  with  sesame.^    The  noble  followed  the 
prescription  and  had  so  much  faith  in  it  that  his  imaginary 
complaint  disappeared. 

Finally  Costa  considers  the  question  of  the  validity  of  How  are 
amulets,  or  ligatures  and  suspensions,  which  we  have  heard  efifective? 
Socrates  class  with  incantations,  adjurations,  characters,  and 
images.  Costa  says  that  he  has  read  in  many  works  by  the 
ancients  that  objects  suspended  from  the  neck  are  potent 
not  through  their  natural,  but  their  occult  properties.  He 
will  not  deny  that  this  may  be  so,  but  is  inclined  as  before 

^Mineral.  II,  iii,  6  (ed.  Borgnet,      word:  it  is  sizamelon  in  one  text, 
V,   55-6).  sesameleon  in  another. 

*I   am   not    certain   as   to    this 


6s6 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Citations 
from  the 
lapidary 
of  the 
Pseudo- 
Aristotle. 


From 
Galen  and 
Dioscor- 
ides. 


Occult 
virtue. 


to  attribute  the  result  rather  to  the  comforting  effect  which 
such  things  have  upon  one's  mind.  He  proceeds,  however, 
to  list  a  number  of  suspensions  recommended  by  ancient 
writers. 

First  he  cites  from  "Aristotle  in  the  Book  of  Stones,"  a 
spurious  treatise  of  which  we  shall  have  more  to  say  in  the 
chapter  on  Aristotle  in  the  middle  ages,  a  number  of  ex- 
amples of  the  marvelous  powers  of  gems  worn  suspended 
from  the  neck  or  set  in  a  ring  upon  the  finger.  One  augments 
the  flow  of  saliva,  another  checks  the  flow  of  blood.  The 
stone  hyacinth  enables  its  bearer  to  pass  safely  through  a 
pestilent  region,  and  makes  him  honored  in  men's  thoughts 
and  procures  the  granting  of  his  petitions  by  rulers.  The 
emerald  wards  off  epilepsy,  "wherefore  we  often  prescribe 
to  nobles  that  their  children  should  wear  this  stone  hung 
about  the  neck  lest  they  incur  this  infirmity." 

Costa  also  cites  some  recommendations  of  ligatures  and 
suspensions  from  Galen,  such  as  curing  stomach-ache  by 
suspending  coral  about  the  neck  or  abdomen,  or  the  dung 
of  wolves  who  have  eaten  bones,  which  should  preferably 
be  bound  on  with  a  thread  made  from  the  wool  of  a  sheep 
eaten  by  that  wolf.  To  Dioscorides  are  attributed  such 
amulets  as  the  teeth  of  a  mad  dog  who  has  bit  a  man,  which 
will  safeguard  their  wearer  from  ever  being  so  bitten — 
and  it  would  be  somewhat  of  a  coincidence,  if  he  were — 
and  the  seed  of  wild  saffron  which,  held  in  the  hand  or  worn 
about  the  neck,  is  good  for  the  stings  of  scorpions.  The 
Indians  are  cited  for  what  is  a  recipe  rather  than  an  amulet : 
stercum  elephantiniim  cum  melle  mixtum  et  in  i/ulva 
midieris  podtum  numquam  permittit  concipere.  And  some 
say  that  a  woman  who  spits  thrice  in  a  frog's  mouth  will 
not  conceive  for  a  year.  A  number  of  other  examples  are 
given  without  mention  of  any  particular  authority.  Some 
of  them,  indeed,  are  very  familiar  and  could  be  found  in 
many  authors,  and  we  shall  meet  them  in  other  contexts. 

Costa  concludes  by  saying  that  he  himself  has  not  tested 
these  statements  extracted  from  the  works  of  the  ancients, 


xxviii  ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE  657 

but  that  neither  will  he  deny  them,  since  there  exist  in  nature 
many  strange  phenomena  and  inexplicable  forces.  We 
would  not  believe  that  the  magnet  attracts  iron,  if  we  had 
not  seen  it.  Similarly  lead  breaks  adamant  which  iron  can- 
not break.  There  is  a  stone  which  no  furnace  can  consume 
and  a  fish  which  paralyzes  the  hand  of  the  person  catching 
it.  These  strange  properties  act  in  some  subtle  and  mighty 
fashion  which  is  not  perceptible  to  our  senses  and  which  we 
cannot  account  for  by  reasoning.^  But  it  is  noteworthy  that 
as  in  discussing  incantations  Costa  said  nothing  of  demons, 
so  he  fails  to  ascribe  occult  virtue  to  the  influence  of  the 
stars. 

Another  treatise  by  Costa  ben  Luca,  On  the  Difference  On  the 

between  Soul  and  Spirit,"  has  little  to  do  with  occult  science,   ^^ff^^^^<^^ 
'        '  ^  '    between 

but  gives  too  good  a  glimpse  of  medieval  notions  in  the  Soul  and 
field  of  physiological  psychology  to  pass  it  by.  It  was  trans- 
lated into  Latin  by  John  of  Spain  for  Archbishop  Raymond 
of  Toledo  in  the  twelfth  century,^  and  is  found  in  many 
manuscripts,  often  together  with  the  works  of  Aristotle.* 
Probably  by  a  confusion  of  the  names  Costa  ben  Luca  and 
Constantinus  ^   it  was  printed  among  the  latter's  works,® 

*  "Quorum  enim  actio  ex  pro-  or  14th  century  mostly:  BN  6319, 
prietate  est  non  rationibus,  unde  Itii;  6322,  Sri;  6323,  S6;  6323A; 
sic  comprehendi  non  potest.  Ra-  6325,  #17;  6567A;  6569;  8247; 
tionibus  enim  tantum  comprehen-  16082;  16083;  16088;  16142;  16490. 
duntur  que  sensibus  subministran-  °  Specific  illustrations  of  such 
tur.  Aliquando  ergo  quedam  sub-  confusions  between  the  two  names 
stantie  habent  proprietatem  ratione  in  the  MSS  are:  BN  6296,  14th 
incomprehensibilem  propter  sui  century,  ttis,  "...  authore  filio 
subtilitatem  et  sensibus  non  sub-  Lucae  Medici  Constabolo" ;  Brus- 
ministratum  propter  altitudinem  sels,  Library  of  Dukes  of  Bur- 
sui  magnam."  I  doubt  if  these  gundy  2784,  12th  century,  "Con- 
last  three  words  refer  to  the  in-  staben" ;  Sloane  2454,  late  13th 
fluence  of  the  stars.  century,    "Liber    differentiae    inter 

^  Liber    de     differentia    spiritus  animam    et    spiritum    quern    Con- 

et  animae,  or  De  differentia  inter  stantinus    Luce    amico    suo    scrip- 

animam    et    spiritum.     The    pro-  tori  Regis  edidit." 

logue    opens  :    "Interrogasti    me —  °  Constantinus    Af  ricanus,    Ope- 

honoret     te    Deus ! — de     differen-  ra,  Basel,    1536,   pp.  307-17,   "Qui 

tia  .  .  ."  voluerit  scire  differentiam,  que  est 

*  Steinschneider  (1866),  p.  404;  inter  duas  res  .../..  .  Hec 
(1905),  p.  43,  "wovon  ich  das  igitur  de  differentiis  spiritus  et 
Original  in  Gotha  1158  erkannte."  anime  tibi  dicta  sufficiant,  valeto." 

■"So  in  Corpus  Christi  114,  late  Edited  more  recently  by  S 
13th  century,  fol.  229,  and  at  Paris  Barach,  Innsbruck,  1878,  pp.  120- 
in  the  following  MSS  of  the  13th      39. 


658  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

and  indeed  we  find  very  similar  views  in  his  Pantegni  ^  and 
in  his  treatise  On  Melancholy.  The  work  has  also  been  as- 
cribed to  Augustine,^  Isaac,^  Avicenna,^  Alexander  Neckam, 
Thomas  of  Cantimpre,  and  Albertus  Magnus.^  A  different 
work  with  a  similar  title  and  somewhat  similar  contents  is 
the  De  spiritu  et  anima,  which  is  printed  with  the  works 
of  Augustine  ®  but  which  cites  such  later  authors  as  Boe- 
thius,  Isidore,  Bede,  Alcuin,  St.  Bernard,  and  Hugh  of  St. 
Victor,  to  whom  also  it  has  been  attributed.'^  Thomas 
Aquinas  called  it  the  work  of  an  anonymous  Cistercian.^ 
But  to  return  to  our  treatise. 
The  na-  Costa  ben  Luca  has,  as  we  have  hinted,  some  diverting 

^spkitus  passages  in  the  fields  of  physiological  psychology.  He  be- 
lieves in  the  existence  of  spiritus,  which  is  not  spirit  in  one 
of  our  senses  of  that  word,  but  "a  subtle  body,"  unlike  the 
soul  which  is  incorporeal.  This  subtle  spiritus  perishes  when 
separated  from  the  body  and  it  operates  most  of  the  vital 
processes  of  the  body  such  as  breathing  and  the  pulse,  sensa- 
tion and  movement.  The  two  former  processes  are  operated 
by  spiritus  "arising  from  the  heart  and  borne  in  the  pulsat- 
ing veins  to  vivify  the  body."  The  two  latter  processes  are 
caused  by  spiritus  which  arises  from  the  brain  and  operates 
through  the  nerves.  Thus  spiritus  is  the  cause  of  life  in 
the  body  and  it  leaves  this  mortal  frame  with  our  dying 
gasp.  The  clearer  and  more  subtle  this  spiritus  is,  the  more 
readily  it  lends  itself  to  mental  processes,  while  the  more 
perfect  the  human  body,  the  more  perfect  the  spiritus  and 
the  human  mind.  Hence  the  intellectual  powers  of  children 
and  women  are  inferior,  and  the  same  is  true  of  races  sub- 
jected to  excessive  heat  or  cold  like  the  Ethiopians  or  Slays. 

*  Theorica,  III,  12.  de   differencia  spiritus  et   anime." 

*  Corpus  Christi  154,  late  13th  "  So  says  Coxe,  anent  Corpus 
century,  pp.  356-74,  ascribed  to  Christi  114,  and  Steinschneider 
Augustine    in    both    Titulus    and  (iQOS),  P-  43- 

Explicit.  °  Migne,  PL  40,  779-^32. 

^  S.    Marco    179,    14th    century,  '  By  Trithemius ;  but  earlier  so 

fols.  57-9,  83,  Liber  Ysaac  de  dif-  cited     by     Vincent     of     Beauvais 

ferentia    spiritus    et   animae.  (PL  40,  779-80).     See  also  Exon. 

*  CU    Gonvillc    and    Caius    109,  23,    13th  century,   fol.   ig6v. 
13th  century,  fols.  i-6v,  "Avicenna  "Migne,  PL  40,  779-80. 


XXVIII 


ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE 


659 


Here  we  have  the  same  views  repeated  as  in  the  Epistle  con- 
cerning Incantation.  Some  physicians  and  philosophers 
think  that  there  are  two  vessels  in  the  heart  and  that  there 
is  more  spiritus  than  blood  in  the  left  hand  vessel  and  more 
blood  than  spiritus  in  the  right  hand  vessel.  The  spiritus 
in  the  brain  becomes  more  subtle  and  apt  to  receive  the 
virtues  of  the  soul  by  its  passage  from  one  cavity  of  the 
brain  to  another.  The  less  subtle  spiritus  the  brain  uses 
for  the  five  senses;  Costa  speaks  of  "hollow  nerves"  from 
the  brain  to  the  eye  through  which  the  spiritus  passes  for 
the  purpose  of  vision.  The  most  subtle  spiritus  is  employed 
in  the  higher  mental  processes  such  as  imagination,  memory, 
and  reason. 

Costa  ben  Luca  gives  an  amusing  explanation  of  how 
these  processes  take  place  in  the  brain.  The  opening  be- 
tween the  anterior  and  posterior  ventricles  of  the  brain  is 
closed  by  a  sort  of  valve  which  he  describes  as  "a  particle 
of  the  body  of  the  brain  similar  to  a  worm."  When  a  man 
is  in  the  act  of  recalling  something  to  memory,  this  valve 
opens  and  the  spiritus  passes  from  the  anterior  to  the  pos- 
terior cavity.  Moreover,  the  speed  with  which  this  valve 
works  or  responds  dififers  in  different  brains,  and  this  fact 
explains  why  some  men  are  of  slow  memory  and  why  others 
answer  a  question  so  much  sooner.  The  habit  of  inclining 
the  head  when  deep  in  cogitation  is  also  to  be  explained 
as  tending  to  open  this  valve.  However,  the  relative 
subtlety  of  the  spiritus  is  another  important  factor  in  intel- 
lectual ability. 

Other  medieval  writers  differed  somewhat  from  these 
views  of  Costa  ben  Luca  as  to  the  nature  of  spiritus  and 
the  cavities  of  the  brain.  For  instance,  Constantinus 
Africanus  in  his  treatise  On  Melancholy  states  that  the 
spiritus  of  the  brain  is  called  the  rational  soul,  which  is 
inconsistent  with  the  distinction  drawn  between  soul  and 
spirit  in  the  other  treatise.  In  the  eleventh  century  both 
Constantinus  in  his  Pantegni  and  Anatomy  or  De  humana 


Thought 
explained 
phj'sio- 
logically. 


Views  of 
other 
medieval 
writers. 


66o  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

natura,^  and  Petrocellus  the  Salemitan  in  his  Practica;  ^  in 
the  twelfth  century  both  Hildegard  of  Bingen  ^  and  the 
Pseudo-Augustinian  Liber  de  spiritu  et  anima;  ^  in  the 
thirteenth  century  both  Bartholomew  of  England,  who 
seems  to  cite  Johannitius  (Hunain  ibn  Ishak)  on  this  point,^ 
and  Vincent  of  Beauvais  agree  that  the  brain  has  three  main 
cavities.  The  first  is  phantastic,  from  which  the  senses  are 
controlled,  where  the  sensations  are  registered,  and  where 
the  process  of  imagination  goes  on.  The  middle  cell  is 
logical  or  rational,  and  there  the  forms  received  from  the 
senses  and  imagination  are  examined  and  judged.  The 
third  cell  retains  such  forms  as  pass  this  examination  and 
so  is  the  seat  of  memory.®  The  Pseudo-Augustine,  however, 
represents  it  further  as  the  source  of  motor  activity.  Con- 
stantinus  and  Vincent  of  Beauvais,  who  quotes  him  in  the 
thirteenth  century,  further  distinguish  the  phantastic  cavity 
as  hot  and  dry,  the  logical  cell  as  cold  and  moist,  and  the 
seat  of  memory  as  cold  and  dry.  Moreover,  the  phantastic 
cell  which  multiplies  forms  contains  a  great  deal  of  spiritus 
and  very  little  medulla,  while  the  cell  of  memory  which  re- 
tains the  smaller  number  of  forms  selected  by  reason  con- 
tains much  medulla  and  little  spiritus.  Thus  the  general 
point  of  view  of  these  other  authors  resembles  that  of  Costa 
ben  Luca  despite  the  divergence  from  him  in  details.  They 
perhaps  also  owe  something  to  Augustine,  who  in  his  genuine 
works  speaks  of  the  three  cells  of  the  brain  but  makes  the 

*  Both  passages  were  excerpted  ®  Similarly  E.  G.  Browne  (1921), 
by  Vincent  of  Beauvais,  Specu-  p.  123,  writing  of  Arabian  medi- 
lum  naturale,  XXIX,  41.  cine  and  Avicenna,   says,  "Corre- 

"  De    Renzi    (1852-9)     IV,    189;  sponding    with    the    five    external 

Petrocellus    is   very  brief    on   the  senses,      taste,      touch,      hearing, 

cells  of  the  brain.  smelling,  and  seeing,  are  the  five 

'Singer    (1917),  pp.  45  and  51,  internal  senses,  of  which  the  first 

has    noted    that    Hildegard's    de-  and    second,   the   compound   sense 

scription  of   the  brain  as   divided  (or   'sensus    communis')    and    the 

into   three   chambers  is  anteceded  imagination,  are  located  in  the  an- 

by   the   Liber   de    humana   natura  terior  ventricle  of  the  brain;  the 

of  Constantinus,  and  contained  "in  third  and   fourth,   the  co-ordinat- 

the  writings  of  St.  Augustine."  ing  and  emotional  faculties,  in  the 

*  PL  40,  795,  cap.  22.  mid-brain ;  and  the  fifth,  the  mem- 
'^De    proprietatibus   rerum,    III,  cry,  in  the  hind-brain."    Galen  had 

10  and    16;   V,  3.  somewhat  similar  ideas. 


XXVIII  ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE  66i 

hind-brain  the  center  of  motor  activity,  and  the  mid-brain 
the  seat  of  memory.^ 

Thabit  ibn  Kurrah  ibn  Marwan  ibn  Karaya  ibn  Ibrahim  Thebit 
ibn  Marines  ibn  Salamanos  (Abu  Al  Hasan)  Al  Harrani  ^orat 
or  Thabit  ben  Corrah  ben  Zahrun  el  Harrani,  or  Tabit  ibn 
Qorra  ibn  Merwan,  Abu'l-Hasan,  el-Harrani,  or  Thabit  ben 
Qorrah  or  Thabit  ibn  Qurra,  or  Tabit  ibn  Korrah,  or  Thabit 
ben  Korra,  as  he  is  variously  designated  by  modern 
scholars ;  -  or  Thebit  ben  Corat,  or  Thebith  ben  Corath,  or 
Thebit  filius  Core,  or  Thebites  filius  Chori,  also  Tabith,  Te- 
bith,  Thabit,  Thebeth,  Thebyth,  and  Benchorac,  ben  corach, 
etc.,  as  we  find  it  in  the  medieval  Latin  versions — Thebit 
ben  Corat  seems  the  prevalent  medieval  spelling  and  so 
will  be  adopted  here — was  born  at  Harran  in  Mesopotamia 
about  836,  spent  much  of  his  life  at  Bagdad,  and  lived  until 
about  901.^  He  wrote  in  Arabic  as  well  as  Syriac,  but  was 
not  a  Mohammedan,  and  Roger  Bacon  alludes  to  him  as 
"the  supreme  philosopher  among  all  Christians,  who  has 
added  in  many  respects,  speculative  as  well  as  practical,  to 
the  work  of  Ptolemy."  "*  As  a  matter  of  fact,  he  was  a 
heathen  or  pagan,  a  member  of  the  sect  of  Sabians,  whose 
chief  seat  was  at  his  birth-place,  Harran. 

The  Sabians  appear  to  have  continued  the  paganism  The 
and  astrology  of  Babylonia,  but  also  to  have  accepted  the 
Agathodaemon  and  Hermes  of  Egypt,^  and  to  have  had 
relations  with  Gnosticism  and  Neo-Platonism.  They  seem 
to  have  laid  especial  stress  upon  the  spirits  of  the  planets,^ 
to  whom  they  made  prayers,  sacrifices,  and  suffumigations,^ 
while  days  on  which  the  planets  reached  their  culminating- 

*  De  Gencsi  ad  litteram,  VII,  18  tain    whether   the    length    of    his 

(PL  34,  364).  life    is    given    in    lunar    or    solar 

^The    fullest   treatment   of   him  years:     see    Chwolson,     I,     532-3, 

will  be  found  in  D.  A.  Chwolson,  547-8.  _ 
Die   Ssabier   und    der   Ssabismns,  ''Bridges,  I,  394. 

Petrograd,    1856,    2   vols.,   passim.  ^  Carra      de     Vaux,     Azncenne, 

For  a  list  of  his  v^orks  see  Stein-  Paris,  1900,  p.  68. 
Schneider.      Zeitschrift    f.    Math.,  "Chwolson,    II,    406,    422,    431, 

XVIII,  331-38.  440,  453,  610,  703. 

'There    is    some   difficulty   with  'Ibid..    I.   741;    II,   7,   258,   386, 

these  dates  or  their  Arabic  equiv-  677,  etc. 
alents,    because    we    are   not   cer- 


Sabians. 


662 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Thebit's 
relations 
to  Sabi- 
anism. 


points  were  celebrated  as  festivals.^  They  observed  the 
houses  and  stations  of  the  planets,  their  risings  and  settings, 
conjunctions  and  oppositions,  and  rule  over  certain  hours 
of  the  day  and  night,^  Some  planets  were  masculine,  others 
feminine ;  some  lucky,  others  unlucky ;  ^  they  were  related 
to  different  metals ;  *  the  different  members  of  the  human 
body  were  placed  under  different  signs  of  the  zodiac;^ 
and  in  general  each  planet  had  its  own  appropriate  figures 
and  forms,  and  ruled  over  certain  climates,  regions,  and 
things  ®  in  nature.  Most  of  this,  however,  is  astrological 
commonplace  whether  of  pagans,  Mohammedans,  or  Chris- 
tians. Nor  were  the  Sabians  peculiar  in  associating  in- 
tellectual substances  or  spirits  with  the  planets.'^  It  was 
only  in  worshiping  these  and  denying  the  existence  of  one 
God  and  in  their  practice  of  sacrificial  divination  that  they 
could  be  distinguished  as  heathen  or  pagan.  However,  they 
seem  to  have  devoted  a  rather  unusual  amount  of  attention 
to  astrology  and  other  forms  of  magic  such  as  oracular 
heads, ^  magic  knots  and  figures,®  and  seal-rings  carved 
with  peculiar  animal  figures.  These  last  they  often  buried 
with  the  dead  for  a  time  in  order  to  increase  their  virtue. -^^ 
Thebit,  at  any  rate,  seems  to  have  prided  himself  upon 
being  a  descendant  of  pagan  antiquity.  In  a  passage  prais- 
ing his  native  town  he  said,  "We  are  the  heirs  and  posterity 
of  heathenism,"  ^^  and  he  described  with  veneration  a  ruined 
Greek  temple  at  Antioch,^^  He  had,  however,  some  religious 
disagreement  with  the  Sabians  of  Harran  and  was  finally 
forced  to  leave. ^^  He  met  a  philosopher  who  took  him  to 
Bagdad  where  he  became  one  of  the  Caliph's  astronomers  ^* 
and  founded  there  a  Sabian  community  to  his  own  taste. 


'Chwolson,  II,  386-97,  500,  525, 
530,  676. 

"Ibid.,  I,  737, 
'Ibid.,  II,  30,  373. 
*Ibid.,  II,  411,  658,  839. 
Ubid.,  II,  253. 
"Ibid.,  I,  738. 
'Ibid.,  I,  733-4, 
^Ibid.,  II,  19,  148,  150. 
''Ibid.,  II,  21,  138-9, 
"^Ibid.,  I,  526;  II,  141, 


"  Quoted  by  Bishop  Gregory 
Bar-hebraeus  in  his  Syrian  Chron- 
icle:  Chwolson,  I,   177-80. 

"Chwolson,  I,   195;  II,  623, 

"Ibid.,  I,  482-3. 

"  Again  there  seems  to  be  un- 
certainty as  to  dates,  since  the 
Arabic  sources  name  a  caHph  who 
was  not  contemporary  with  the 
philosopher  in  question :  Chwol- 
son, I,  548-9, 


XXVIII 


ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE 


663 


His  numerous  religious  writings  show  the  value  which  he 
attached  to  various  Sabian  usages  and  rites :  ceremonials 
at  burials,  hours  of  prayer,  rules  of  purity  and  impurity 
and  concerning  the  animals  to  be  sacrificed,  readings  in 
honor  of  the  difTferent  planets.^ 

Thebit  was  a  writer  of  encyclopedic  range  and  trans- 
lated from  the  Greek  ^  into  Arabic  or  Syriac  such  authors 
as  Apollonius,  Archimedes,  Aristotle,  Euclid,  Hippocrates, 
and  Galen.  He  "was  famed  above  all  as  a  philosopher,"  ^ 
but  most  of  his  philosophical  works  are  lost,  but  some  geo- 
metrical treatises  by  him  are  extant,  and  a  work  on  weights 
appears  in  Latin  translation.'*  A  group  of  four  astronomical 
treatises  by  him  also  occurs  with  fair  frequency  in  medieval 
manuscripts.^  On  the  basis  of  these  specimens  of  his  as- 
tronomy Delambre  was  not  moved  to  assign  him  any  great 
place  in  the  history  of  the  science ;  ^  Chwolson  objects  that 
they  are  too  brief  to  do  him  justice,''^  but  they  are  probably 
the  cream  of  his  own  contributions  to  the  subject  or  the 
middle  ages  would  not  have  translated  and  preserved  them 
so  sedulously. 

Whatever  Thebit's  contributions  to  positive  knowledge 
may  or  may  not  have  been,  there  is  no  dispute  as  to  the  fact 
that  he  was  given  to  occult  science  and  even  superstition. 
His  attitude  towards  alchemy,  indeed,  is  doubtful,  as  a 
work  of  alchemy  is  ascribed  to  him  in  one  manuscript  of 

'Chwolson,    I,    485.      Chwolson  ®  Harleian    13,    fol.    118-   Thebit 

perhaps  lays  himself  open  a  little      de  motu   octave  spere;   fol.   I20v- 


to  the  charge  of  arguing  in  a  cir- 
cle, since  Thebit's  writings  are  his 
main  source  concerning  Sabian- 
ism. 

^  Ibid.,  I,  553-64,  for  a  list  of  his 
translations  of,  extracts  from,  and 
commentaries  upon   Greek  works. 

^Ibid.,  I,  484. 

■•BN  10260,  i6th  century,  "In- 
cipit  liber  Karastoni  de  ponderi- 
bus  .../...  editus  a  Thebit 
filio  Core."  Also  in  BN  ysyyB,  14- 
15th  century,  S3;  7424,  14th  cen- 
tury, S6;  Vienna  5203,  15th  cen- 
tury, fols.  172-80.  For  other  MSS 
see  Bjornbo   (1911)    140. 


Liber  Thebith  ben  Corath  de  his 
qui  indigent  expositione  ante- 
quam  legitur  Almagestum ;  123- 
Liber  Thebit  de  ymaginatione 
spere  et  circulorum  eius  diver- 
sorum ;  124V-  Liber  Thebith  de 
quantitatibus  stellarum  et  plane- 
tarum. 

Also  in  Harl.  3647,  #11-14; 
Tanner  192,  14th  century,  fol. 
103- ;  BN  7195,  14th  century,  S12- 
15;  Magliabech.  XI-117,  14th  cen- 
tury; CUL  1767  (li.  Ill,  3)  1276 
A.  D.,  fols.  86-96;  and  many  other 
MSS. 

'Delambre    (1819)   73. 

'  Chwolson,  I,  551. 


Thebit 
as  ency- 
clopedist, 
philoso- 
pher, as- 
tronomer. 


His  occujt 
science. 


664 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


the  fourteenth  century  and  some  notes  against  the  art  in 
another.^  But  of  his  adhesion  to  astrology  there  is  no 
doubt,"  and  Chwolson  notes  his  interest  in  the  mystic  power 
of  letters  and  magic  combinations  of  them.^  But  the  one 
outstanding  example  of  his  occult  science  is  his  treatise  on 
images,  which  seems  to  have  been  a  favorite  with  the  Latin 
middle  ages,  since  it  appears  to  have  been  translated  into 
Latin  twice,  by  Adelard  of  Bath  ^  and  by  John  of  Seville,^ 

*BN  6514,  #10,  Thebit  de  alchy- 
mia;  Amplon.  Quarto  312,  written 
before  1323  A.  D.,  fol.  29, 
Notule  Thebith  contra  alchimiam. 

^A  work  on  judgments  is  as- 
cribed to  him  in  a  Munich  MS, 
CLM  588,  14th  century,  fol.  189- 
Thebites  de  iudiciis;  followed  by, 
220-  Liber  iudicialis  Ptolomei,  233- 
Libellus  de  iudiciis,  and  238- 
Modus  iudicandi.  The  treatise 
on  fifteen  stars,  fifteen  herbs,  and 
fifteen  stones,  which  as  we  have 
seen  is  usually  ascribed  to  Hermes 
or  Enoch,  is  attributed  to  Thebit 
in  at  least  one  MS,  BN  7^37,  page 
129-. 

'I,  551. 

*  Lyons  328,  fols.  70-74,  Liber 
prestigiorum  Thebidis  (Elbidis) 
secundum  Ptolemeum  et  Herme- 
tem  per  Adhelardum  bathonien- 
sem  translatus,  opening,  "Qui- 
cunque  geometria  atque  philosopia 
peritus  astronomiae  expers  fuerit 
ociosus  est."  In  this  MS  the 
treatise  closes  with  the  words,  "ut 
prestigiorum  artifex  facultate 
non  decidat."  This  seems  to  be 
the  only  MS  known  where  the 
translation  is  ascribed  to  Adelard 
of  Bath.  It  seems  to  have  once 
been  part  of  Avranches  235,  12th 
century,  where  the  same  title  is 
listed  in  the  table  of  contents. 
Haskins,  in  EHR  (1911)  495,  fails 
to  identify  the  work,  calling  it 
"a  treatise  on  horoscopes."  It  is 
to  be  noted,  however,  that  Al- 
bertus  Magnus  in  listing  bad  nec- 
romantic books  on  images  in  the 
Speculum  astronomiae  (cap.  xi, 
Borgnet,  X,  641)  gives  the  same 
Incipit  for  a  liber  praestigiorum 
by  Hermes,  "Qui  geometriae  aut 
philosophiae  peritus,  expers  astro- 


nomiae    fuerit  .  .  .**    Undoubtedly 
the  two  were  the  same. 

®  Of  John  of  Seville's  translation 
the  MSS  are  more  numerous.  The 
following  will  serve  as  a  repre- 
sentative. Royal  12-C-XVIII, 
14th  century,  fols.  I0v-i2r,  "Dixit 
thebyth  bencorat  et  dixit  aristo- 
teles  qui  philosophiam  et  geomet- 
riam  exercet  et  omnem  scien- 
tiam  legit  et  ab  astronomia  va- 
cuus fuerit  erit  occupatus  et 
vacuus  quod  dignior  geometria  et 
altior  philosophia  est  ymaginum 
scientia.  /  Explicit  tractatus  de 
imaginibus  Thebith  Bencorath 
translatus  a  lohanne  Hyspalensi 
atque  Limiensi  in  Limia  ex  Ara- 
bico  in  Latinum.  Sit  laus  dec 
maximo." 

This  is  the  version  cited  by 
Michael  Scot  in  his  Liber  Intro- 
duct  orius  (Bodleian  266,  fol.  200) 
where  he  gives  the  Incipit,  "Dixe- 
runt  enim  thebith  benchorath  et 
aristoteles  quod  si  quis  philoso- 
phiam .  .  .  ,"  etc.,  substantially  as 
above. 

But  now  comes  a  good  joke  on 
Albertus,  who  has  listed  among 
good  astronomical  books  of 
images  (Speculum  astronomiae, 
cap.  xi,  Borgnet,  p.  642)  the  work 
of  "Thebith  eben  chorath"  open- 
ing "Dixit  A.  qui  philosophi- 
am .  .  ."  which  of  course  is  that 
just  mentioned.  Thus  he  con- 
demns one  translation  of  the  same 
book  and  approves  the  other ;  is 
he  perhaps  having  some  fun  at 
the  expense  of  the  opponents  of 
both  astrology  and  necromancy? 

It  will  be  noted  that  it  is  Aris- 
totle, rather  than  Hermes  or 
Ptdiuny,  who  is  cited  at  the  start 
ii;  jo'.iu  of  Seville's  translation.     I 


XXVIII 


ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE 


66s 


since  the  manuscripts  of  it  are  numerous/  and  it  also  was 
printed,^  and  since  Thebit  is  cited  as  an  authority  on  the 
subject  of  images  by  such  medieval  writers  as  Roger  Bacon, 
Albertus  Magnus,^  the  author  of  Picatrix,^  Peter  of  Abano,^ 
and  Cecco  d'Ascoli.^ 

The  work  begins  by  emphasizing  the  need  of  a  knowl- 
edge of  astronomy  in  order  to  perform  feats  of  magic 
(praestigia) .  The  images  described  are  astronomical  or 
astrological  and  must  be  constructed  under  prescribed  con- 
stellations in  order  to  fulfill  the  end  sought.  Often,  how- 
ever, they  are  human  forms  rather  than  astronomical  figures. 
It  is  not  necessary  to  engrave  them  upon  gems;  Thebit  ex- 
pressly states  that  the  material  of  which  they  are  made  or 


therefore  am  uncertain  whether 
Chwolson  has  our  Jreatise  in 
mind,  when  he  speaks  of  Thebit's 
commenting  upon  "eine  pseudo- 
hermetische  Schrift  iiber  TaHs- 
mane  u.s.w."  In  the  printed  text 
of  1559  Aristotle  and  Ptolemy  are 
cited  in  the  first  paragraph,  but  in 
the  MSS  Aristotle  is  cited  twice. 

^  Some  other  MSS  differ  slight- 
ly from  the  foregoing  in  their 
opening  words,  but  perhaps  not 
enough  to  sjuggest  a  third  transla- 
tion: 

Ashmole  346,  i6th  century,  fols. 
113-15V,  "Incipit  liber  de  ymagi- 
nibus  secundum  Thebit.  In  no- 
mine pii  et  misericordis  Dei. 
Dixit  Thebit  qui  geometric  aut 
philosophic   expers    fuerit." 

Bodleian  463  (Bernard  2456), 
written  in  Spain,  14th  century, 
fols.  75r-75v,  "Dixit  thebit  ben- 
corat  Ar.  qui  legit  phylosophiam 
et  geumetriam  et  omnem  scien- 
tiam  et  alienus  fuerit  ab  astrono- 
mia  erit  impeditus  vel  occupatus." 

The  following  MSS  ascribe  the 
translation  to  John  of  Spain  and 
have  the  usual  opening  words, 
"Dixit  Thebit  ben  Corat,  Dixit 
Aristoteles,  qui  philosophiam,  etc." 

Digby  194,  15th  century,  fol. 
I45V-. 

S.  Marco  XI-102,  14th  century, 
fols.  150-53. 

Berlin    963,    15th    century,    fol. 


140-  "Dixit  thebit  ben  corach 
Cum  volueris  operari  de  ymagi- 
nibus,"  but  then  at  fol.  199,  w.ith 
the  usual  Incipit. 

Harleian  80  has  the  first  part 
missing  but  ends,  fol.  76r,  like 
John's    translation. 

Still  other  MSS  are: 

Harleian  3647,   13th  century, 

Sloane  3S46,  fols.  86V-93;  3847; 
and  3883,  fols.  87-93  :  all  three  17th 
century. 

Amplon.  Quarto  174,  14th  cen- 
tury, fols.  120-1. 

BN  7282,  15th  century,  #4,  in- 
terprete  Joanne  Hispalensi. 

Berlin   964,    15th   century,    fols. 

213-5- 

Vienna  2378,  14th  century,  fols. 
41-63. 

CLM  27,  I4-I5th  century,  fols. 
7'^-77',  59,  15th  century,  fols.  239- 
43. 

Florence  II-iii-214,  15th  century, 
fols.  1-4,  "Incipit  liber  Thebit 
Benchorac  de  scientia  omigarum 
et  imaginum.  (D)  ixit  Aristot- 
tiles  qui." 

^De  tribus  imaginibus  magicis, 
Frankfurt,  1559. 

^Mineral.  II,  iii,  3. 

*  Magliabech.  XX-2Q,  fol.  I2r; 
Sloane   1305,  fol.    igr. 

"  Conciliator,  Diff.  X.,  fol.  16GH, 
in  ed.  Venice,   1526. 

°  Commentary  on  the  Sphere, 
cap.  3. 


Astrologi- 
cal and 
magic 
images. 


666  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

upon  which  they  are  engraved  is  unimportant,  and  that  lead 
or  tin  or  bronze  or  gold  or  silver  or  wax  or  mud  or  any- 
thing you  please  will  do.  The  essential  thing  and  "the  per- 
fection of  mastery"  is  careful  conformity  to  astrological 
conditions.  This  science  of  images  is  indeed,  as  Aristotle 
and  Ptolemy  have  testified,  the  acme  of  astrology.  Never- 
theless, after  the  image  has  been  properly  constructed,  there 
is  usually  some  non-astrological  ceremony  to  be  executed  in 
connection  with  it  which  savors  of  magic.  Often  the  image 
is  to  be  buried,  not  however  in  a  grave  as  in  the  case  of 
the  ancient  curses  upon  lead  tablets,  but  in  the  house  of 
someone  concerned.  Once  two  images  are  to  be  placed  facing 
each  other  and  wrapped  in  a  clean  cloth  before  burying 
them.  Instructions  are  also  given  as  to  the  direction  in 
which  the  person  burymg  the  image  should  face.  Also 
forms  of  words  are  prescribed  which  are  to  be  repeated  as 
the  image  is  buried.  Once  the  name  of  the  person  whom 
it  is  desired  to  injure  is  to  be  written  with  "names  of  hate 
on  the  back  of  the  image."  Among  the  objects  supposed 
to  be  achieved  by  such  images  are  driving  off  scorpions,  de- 
stroying a  given  region,  causing  misfortunes  to  happen  to 
others,  recovery  of  stolen  objects,  success  in  business  or 
politics,  protection  from  possible  injury  at  the  hands  of 
the  king,  or  the  causing  of  an  enemy's  death  by  bringing 
him  into  disfavor  with  the  monarch.  The  treatise  closes, 
{it  least  in  the  printed  text,  with  an  admission  of  its  essen- 
tially magic  character  by  saying,  "And  this  is  what  God 
the  highest  wished  to  reveal  to  his  servants  concerning 
magic,  that  His  name  may  be  honored  and  praised  and  ever 
exalted  through  the  ages."  But  no  mention  is  made  of 
demons,  unless  an  instruction  to  name  one  image  "by  a 
famous  name"  alludes  to  some  spirit. 

We  shall  now  conclude  the  present  survey  with  some 
account  of  Rasis  and  his  writings,  with  the  exception  of  a 
number  of  books  of  experiments  ascribed  to  him,  but  which 
it  is  impossible  to  separate  from  those  ascribed  to  Galen 


XXVIII  ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE  667 

and  other  authors,  and  of  which  we  shall  treat  later  under 
the  head  of  such  experimental  literature. 

The  full  name  of  Rasis  or  Rhazes  was  Abu  Bakr  Life  of 
Muhammad  ibn  Zakariya  ar-Razi/  the  last  word  indicating 
his  birthplace  in  Persia.  The  date  of  his  birth  is  uncertain, 
perhaps  about  850.  He  died  in  923  or  924.^  For  the  facts 
of  his  life  we  are  dependent  upon  two  Arabic  writers  of 
the  thirteenth  century  ^  who  do  little  except  tell  one  "good" 
story  after  another  about  him,  or  quote  his  famous  sayings, 
most  of  which  sound  as  if  culled  from  the  works  of  Galen. 
When  about  thirty  years  of  age  Rasis  came  to  Bagdad  and 
is  said  to  have  been  attracted  to  the  study  of  medicine  by 
hearing  how  an  inflamed  and  swollen  forearm  which  gave 
great  pain  was  marvelously  cured  by  the  application  of  an 
herb,  which  came  to  be  called  "the  vivifier  of  the  world." 
In  the  early  years  of  the  tenth  century  Rasis  served  as  physi- 
cian in  the  hospital  at  Bagdad.  According  to  Withington 
he  has  been  called  "the  first  and  most  original  of  the  great 
Moslem  physicians."  He  also  was  interested  in  philosophy 
and  alchemy,  as  his  writings  will  show. 

There  has  come  down  to  us  a  list  of  some  232  works   His  232 
ascribed  to  Rasis. ^    Some  of  them  are  probably  merely  dif-   '"^^o''^^- 
ferent  wordings  of  the  same  title,  others  are  very  likely 
chapters  repeated  from  his  longer  works,  but  at  any  rate 
they  serve  to  give  us  some  idea  of  his  interests  and  the 

^Also  given  as  Muhammad  ibn  the    general    account    of    the    life 

Zakariya  (Abu  Bakr)  ar-Razi  and  and    works    of    Rasis    which    fol- 

Abu    Bekr    Mohammed   ben    Zac-  lows   I  am   indebted  to  G.   S.  A. 

hariah.   _  Ranking's  "The  Life  and  Works 

*  Withington  in  his  Medical  His-  of  Rhazes,"  pp.  237-68,  in  Trans- 

tory,  1894,  gives  the  date  as  932,  actions  of  the  Seventeenth  Inter- 

perhaps  by  a  misprint.  national    Congress    of    Medicine, 

/Ibn    Abi    Usaibi'a    (1203-1269,  Section  XXIII,  London,    1913. 
himself    a    physician    and    son    of  "The     list     is     reproduced     by 

an  oculist)   "Sources  of  Informa-  Ranking     (1913)     in    Arabic    and 

tion   concerning   Classes   of    Phy-  Latin,   largely   on  the   basis  of   a 

sicians,"    compiled    at    Damascus,  MS  at  the  University  of  Glasgow, 

1245-1246,    ed.    by    Midler,    Cairo,  which    contains    a    Latin    transla- 

1882;    and    Ibn    Khallikan    (1211-  tion  by  a  Greek  priest,  who  died 

1282),     "Obituaries     of     Men    of  in    1729,   of   the   Arabic   work   of 

Note,"  written  between   1256  and  Usaibi'a,  or  part  of  it,  mentioned 

1274.  _  in   the   previous   note :    Hunterian 

For   these    titles    and    most    of  Library,  MS  44,  fols.  i-igv. 


668  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

ground  he  covered,  although  of  course  some  may  be  in- 
correctly attributed  to  him.  Editions  of  the  Latin  trans- 
lations of  some  of  his  chief  medical  works  were  printed 
before  the  end  of  the  fifteenth  century  at  Milan  in  1481  and 
Bergamo  in  1497.-^  These  contain  the  famous  Liber  Alman- 
soris  or  Liber  El-Mansuri  dictus  with  its  ten  subordinate 
treatises:  (i)  introduction  to  medicine  and  discussion  of 
human  anatomy,  (2)  the  doctrine  of  temperaments  and 
humors  and  a  discussion  of  the  art  of  physiognomy,^  with 
a  chapter  on  how  to  select  slaves,  (3)  diet  and  drugs,  (4) 
hygiene,  (5)  cosmetics,  (6)  rules  of  health  and  medicines 
for  travelers,  (7)  surgery  or  "the  art  of  binding  up  broken 
bones  and  concerning  wounds  and  ulcers,"  (8)  poisons,  (9) 
treatment  of  diseases  from  head  to  foot,  (10)  fevers.  Fol- 
lowing this  in  both  editions  come  his  works  on  Divisions, 
on  diseases  of  the  joints,  on  the  diseases  of  children,  and 
his  Aphorisms  or  six  books  of  medicinal  secrets.  Other 
writings  by  Rasis  found  in  one  or  both  of  the  printed  edi- 
tions are  a  brief  treatise  on  Surgery,  Cautery,  and  Leeches,^ 
the  book  of  Synonyms,  the  table  of  antidotes,  and  some 
others  which  we  shall  have  occasion  to  mention  later.  His 
treatise  on  the  pestilence  or  on  smallpox  and  measles  was 
printed  many  times  from  the  fifteenth  to  sixteenth  century. 
Char-  In  the  list  of  232  titles  are  three  works  which  all  seem 

discussed  ^^  ^^^^  °^  ^^^  same  point  and  are  perhaps  different  descrip- 
tions of  one  treatise,  or  else  show  that  this  was  a  favorite 
theme  with  Rasis.  The  idea  in  all  three  seems  to  be  that  no 
physician  is  perfect  or  can  cure  all  diseases  of  all  patients, 

*I    have    examined    both    these  duced  separately:  see  Wolfenbiit- 

editions  at   the    British    Museum ;  tel     2885,     15th     century,     f  ol.     i, 

Withington      does     not     mention  Phisonomia   Rasis,    fol.   2,    Phiso- 

them  in  his  History  of  Medicine,  nomia  Aristetehs,  Rasis  et  Philo- 

but   cites    editions    of    the    Conti-  menis,     summorum     magistrorum 

nens,    Venice,     1542,    and     Opera  in    philosophia. 

Parva,    1510,   and   a   modern    edi-  ^  It    occupies    but    a    little    over 

tion   (1858)  by  the  Sydenham  So-  three    pages    in    the    1481    edition, 

ciety  of    On   the   Small   Pox  and  Since  in  the  middle  of  the  treatise 

Measles.      The     pages      are      not  we  read  "Magister  rasis  fecit  cau- 

numbered  in  the  edition  of   1481,  terizari  quidem  artheticum  .  .  .  ," 

so  that  I  shall  not  be  able  to  give  etc.,    it    is    perhaps    by   a    disciple 

exact   references   to  them.  rather  than  Rasis  himself. 

'  This     was     sometimes     repro- 


XXVIII 


ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE 


669 


that  this  is  why  many  persons  go  to  charlatans,  and  why 
sometimes  quacks,  old-wives,  and  popular  practice  succeed 
in  certain  cases  where  the  most  learned  doctors  have  failed.^ 

Other  titles  show  that  Rasis  was  interested  in  natural   His 
science  and  not  merely  in  the  practice  of  medicine.    Besides   n"afj"l  *" 
what  would  appear  to  have  been  a  general  treatise  entitled,   science. 
Opinions  concerning^  Natural  Things,  he  wrote  on  optics, 
holding  that  vision  was  not  by  rays  sent  forth  from  the 
eye,  and  discussing  some  of  the  figures  in  the  work  on  optics 
ascribed  to  Euclid.     In  a  letter  he  inquired  into  the  reason 
for  the  creation  of  wild  beasts  and  venomous  reptiles ;  and 
in  a  third  treatise  wrote  of  the  magnet's  attraction  for  iron 
and  of  vacuums.^     His  interest  in  natural  philosophy  of  a 
rather  theoretical  sort  is  indicated  by  an  Explanation  of  the 
book  of  Plutarch  or  commentary  on  the  book  of  Timaeus.^ 
Other  titles  attest  his  experimental  tendency.^ 

Eight  titles  deal  with  alchemy  ^  and  show  that  Rasis   Rasis 
regarded   transmutation   as   possible.      One   is   a  reply   to  alchemy. 
Alkindi  who  held  the  opposite  opinion.^     None  of  these 
writings  seem  to  be  extant  in  Arabic,  however,  and  the  Latin 
works  of  alchemy  ascribed  to  Rasis  are  generally  regarded 
as  spurious.     The  thirteenth  century  encyclopedist,  Vincent 


*  79,  Dissertatio  de  causis  quae 
plerorumque  hominum  anifnos  a 
praestantissimts  ad  viliores  quos- 
que  medicos  solent  deAectere. 

124,  Liber,  Quod  nicdicus  acu- 
tus  no'n  sit  ille  qui  possit  omnes 
curare  morbos  quoniam  hoc  non 
est    in    hominum    potestate  .  .  .  , 

125,  Epistola,  Quod  artifex  om- 
nibus mim-eris  absoluttis  in  qua- 
cumque  arte  non  existat  nedum, 
in  medicina  speciatitn:  et  de  causa 
cur  invperiti  medici,  vulgns,  et 
etiam  mulieres  in  civitatibus,  foe- 
liciores  sint  in  sanandis  quihusdam 
morbis  quant  znri  doctissimi  et  de 
excusatioiie  medici  hoc  propter. 

There  appears  to  be  a  German 
translation  by  Steinschneider  of 
this  work  by  Rasis  on  the  suc- 
cess of  quacks  and  charlatans  in 
Virchow's  Archiv  f.  Patholo- 
gische  Anatomie,XXX\l,  570-S6. 


'' Ranking  (1913),  #180,  15,  138, 
163. 

^  Ibid.,  tfi37;  also  145,  Supple- 
mentuni  libris  Plutarchi. 

*  Ibid.  $126,  Liber,  De  probatis 
et  experientia  compertis  in  arte 
medica;  per  modtim  syntagmatis 
est  digcstus.  #205,  Liber,  Quod 
in  morbis  qui  determinari  atque 
explicari  non  possunt  oporieat  ut 
medicus  sit  assiduus  apud  aegro- 
tantem  et  debeat  uti  experimentis 
ad  illos  cognoscendos.  Et  de  me- 
dici ifuctatione. 

^  Ibid.  S25,  26,  32-35>  38,  40.  I 
should  guess  that  201,  Arcanum 
arcanorum  de  sapientia,  was  the 
same  as  35,  Arcanum  arcanorum. 

^  Ibid.  ^40,  Responsio  ad  philo- 
sophum  cl-Kendi  eo  quod  artem 
al-Chymi  in  impossibili  posue- 
rit. 


670  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

of  Beauvais,  made  a  number  of  citations  from  the  treatise 
De  salibus  et  aluminibus  attributed  to  Rasis,  but  Berthelot  ^ 
regarded  this  work  as  later  than  Rasis  and  it  is  not  found 
among  our  eight  titles.  The  Lumen  luminis,  which  is  as- 
cribed to  Rasis  ^  and  seems  to  have  been  translated  by 
Michael  Scot  ^  in  the  early  thirteenth  century,  is  also  mainly 
devoted  to  these  two  substances,  salts  and  alums.  A  Book 
of  Seventy  is  ascribed  to  Rasis  as  well  as  to  Geber.  Berthe- 
lot was  inclined  to  think  that  a  Book  of  Secrets  perhaps 
went  back  to  Rasis.  At  least  some  good  stories  are  told 
by  Arabic  chroniclers  of  Rasis'  connection  with  alchemy. 
One  is  to  the  effect  that  he  abandoned  the  art  as  a  result 
of  a  sound  beating  to  which  the  caliph  subjected  him  when 
he  failed  to  transmute  metals  at  order.  Another  states  that 
in  preparing  the  elixir  he  injured  his  eyes  with  its  vapors 
and  was  cured  by  a  physician  who  charged  him  a  fee  of 
five  hundred  dinars.  Rasis  paid  the  doctor's  bill,  but,  re- 
marking that  at  last  he  had  discovered  the  true  alchemy 
and  the  best  art  of  making  gold,  devoted  the  remainder  of 
his  life  to  the  study  and  practice  of  medicine.^ 
Titles  sug-  Rasis  also  wrote  treatises  on  mathematics  and  the  stars 
asSoIo^^  but  it  is  not  always  easy  to  infer  their  contents  from  the 
and  magic,  titles  which  have  alone  reached  us  or  to  tell  when  mathe- 
matica  means  astrology.  In  one  work  he  seems  to  have 
shown  the  excellence  and  utility  of  mathematica,  but  to  have 
confuted  those  who  extolled  it  beyond  measure.^  In  a 
letter  he  denied  that  the  rising  and  setting  of  the  sun  and 
other  planets  was  because  of  the  earth's  motion  and  held 
that  it  was  due  to  the  movement  of  the  celestial  orb.^  In 
another  letter  he  discussed  the  opinion  of  natural  philoso- 
phers concerning  the  sciences  of  the  stars  and  whether  or 

*  Berthelot     (1893),    I,    68    and  latus  a  magistro  michahele  scotto 

286-7.     On  the  alchemy  of  Rasis  philosopho."     Printed  by  J.  Wood 

see   further  in   this   same  volume  Brown   (1897),  p.  240  et  seq. 

the  chapter,  L'Alchimie  de  Rasis  *  Lippmann    (1919),   P-  400,   cit- 

et  du  Pseudo-Aristote.  ing  the  Biographies  of  Albaihaqi 

'BN  6514  and  7156.  (1105-1169). 

'Riccardian  119,  fol.  35v,  "Inci-  "Ranking,  #8. 

pit  liber   luminis  luminum   trans-  'Ibid.  #107. 


XXVIII  ARABIC  OCCULT  SCIENCE  671 

not  the  stars  were  living  beings.^  Rasis  also  discussed  the 
difference  between  dreams  from  which  the  future  can  be 
forecast  and  other  dreams.^  The  title,  Of  exorcisms,  fasci- 
nations, and  incantations,  under  which,  according  to  Negri's 
Latin  translation  Rasis  discussed  the  causes  and  cures  of 
diseases  by  these  methods  and  magic  arts,  should,  in  Ran- 
king's  opinion,  be  more  accurately  translated  as  The  Book 
of  Dimsions  and  Branches.^  A  work  On  the  Necessity  of 
Prayer  is  also  included  in  the  list  of  232  works  ascribed 
to  Rasis,*  while  a  Lapidary  produced  for  Wenzel  II  of 
Bohemia  (1278-1305)  cites  Rasis  On  the  mrtues  of  words 
and  characters.^ 

Herewith  we  conclude  our  present  survey  of  Arabian  Conclu- 
occult  science  especially  in  the  ninth  century,  although  in 
the  following  chapters  we  shall  frequently  encounter  its 
influence.  We  have  found  the  occult  science  closely  asso- 
ciated with  natural  science  and  difficult  to  sever  from  it. 
In  the  authors  and  works  reviewed  we  have  found  both 
scepticism  and  superstition,  both  rationalism  and  empiricism. 
But  perhaps  the  most  impressive  point  is  that  even  super- 
stition pretends  to  be  or  attempts  to  be  scientific. 

*  Ranking,    #134.      Other    titles  'Ibid.  fii3. 

in     mathematics     and     astronomy  ^  Ibid.  S51. 

are:  73,  Liber  de  sphaeris  et  men-  *  Ibid.  #158,  De  'necessitate  pre- 

suris  compendiosis;   128,  De  scp-  cationis. 

tern  planetis  et  de  sapientia;   155,  "  Printed    as    the    Lapidary    of 

De  quadrato  in  mathesi  epistola;  Aristotle,  Merseburg,  1473,  p.  2. 
also  109  and  no. 


CHAPTER  XXIX 

LATIN    ASTROLOGY    AND    DIVINATION  :    ESPECIALLY    IN    THE 
NINTH,  TENTH,  AND  ELEVENTH  CENTURIES 

Astrology  in  Gaul  before  the  twelfth  century — Figures  of  astro- 
logical medicine — The  divine  quaternities  of  Raoul  Glaber — Celestial 
portents  and  other  marvels — An  eleventh  century  calendar — Astrology 
and  divination  in  ecclesiastical  compoti — Notker  on  the  mystic  date  of 
Easter — Prediction  from  the  Kalends  of  January — Other  divination  by 
the  day  of  the  week — Divination  by  the  day  of  the  moon — Authorship 
of  moon-books — Spheres  of  life  and  death:  in  Greek — Medieval  Latin 
versions — Survival  of  such  methods  in  medical  practice  of  about  1400 — 
Egyptian  days — Their  history — Medieval  attempts  to  explain  them — 
Other  perilous  days — Firmicus  read  by  an  archbishop  of  York — Rela- 
tion of  Latin  astrology  to  Arabic — Appendix  L  Some  manuscripts  of 
the  Sphere  of  Pythagoras  or  Apuleius — Appendix  IL  Egyptian  days 
in  early  medieval  manuscripts. 


Astrology 
in  Gaul 
before  the 
twelfth 
century. 


Astrology  had  continued  to  flourish  in  Gaul  in  the  last  de- 
clining days  of  the  Roman  Empire,  despite  the  strictures 
of  Christian  writers  and  clergy,^  and  it  was  one  of  the 
first  subjects  to  revive  after  the  darkness  of  the  Mero- 
vingian period.  Two  centuries  ago  Goujet  in  a  treatise 
on  the  state  of  the  sciences  in  France  from  the  death  of 
Charlemagne  to  that  of  King  Robert  noted  that  from  the 
reign  of  Charlemagne  astronomy  continued  to  be  increas- 
ingly studied.  "The  councils  in  their  decrees,  the  bishops 
in  their  statutes,  the  kings  in  their  capitularies,  expressly 
recommended  the  study  of  it  to  the  clergy."  ^  With  the 
study  of  astronomy  naturally  developed  a  belief  in  as- 
trology. According  to  the  Histoire  Littcrairc  dc  la  France 
it  became  quite  the  fashion  during  the  reign  of  Louis  the 


*  See  De  la  Ville  de  Mirmont, 
L'Astrologie  chez  les  Gallo-Ro- 
mains,  Bordeaux,  1904;  also  pub- 
lished  in   Revue   des  Etudes  an- 


ciennes,    1902,    p.    115- ;    1903,    p. 
25s- ;    1906,  p.   128-. 

^Goujet  (1737),  p.  50;  cited  by 
C.  Jourdain  (1838),  pp.  28-9. 


672 


CHAP.  XXIX  LATIN  ASTROLOGY  AND  DIVINATION      673 

Pious,  Charlemagne's  successor,  when  we  are  told  that  there 
was  no  great  lord  but  had  his  own  astrologer.  Adalmus, 
before  he  became  abbot  of  Castres,  wasted  much  time  upon 
this  pseudo-science,  and  Rabanus  Maurus  showed  tendencies 
in  that  direction.  In  the  tenth  century  such  celestial  phe- 
nomena as  comets  and  eclipses  were  feared  as  sinister  por- 
tents, and  men  resorted  to  enchantments,  auguries,  and  other 
forms  of  divination,^  A  brief  treatise  in  a  manuscript  of  the 
ninth  century  in  the  Vatican  library  also  develops  the  thesis 
that  comets  signify  disasters.^  In  the  eleventh  century  Engel- 
bert,  a  monk  of  Liege,  and  Odo,  teacher  at  Tournai,  were 
devoted  to  the  study  of  the  stars;  and  Gilbert  Maminot, 
bishop  of  Lisieux,  and  for  a  time  chaplain  and  physician ^to 
William  the  Conqueror,  would  rather  spend  his  nights  in 
star-gazing  than  in  sleep.  "But  what  was  the  outcome  of 
all  this  toil  and  study?"  inquires  the  Histoire  Litteraire  and 
replies  to  its  own  question,  ''The  making  of  some  wretched 
astrologers  and  not  a  single  true  astronomer !"  ^ 

These   words  were  written   nearly  two  hundred  years  Figures  of 
ago,  but  such  a  recent  investigation  of  manuscripts  in  French   cal'^medi- 
libraries  as  that  of  Wickersheimer  on  figures  illustrative  of    cme. 
astrological  medicine   from  the  ninth,  tenth,   and  eleventh 
centuries  has   on  the  whole  confirmed  the  importance  of 
astrology  in  the  meager  learning  of  that  time.^    The  manu- 
scripts in  English  libraries,  I  have  found,  tell  a  similar  story. 
Of  the  human  figures  marked  with  the  twelve  signs  of  the 
zodiac,  which  become  so  common  in  the  manuscripts  by  the 
fourteenth  century,  and  in  which  the  head  rests  upon  the 

*  HL  IV,  274-5;  V,   182-3;   VI,       siccles,    in     Transactions    of    the 
g-io.  Seventeenth     International     Con- 

'  Palat.  Lat.  487,   fol.  40,  open-  gress  of  Medicine,  Section  XXIII, 

ing,    "Nouo    et    insolito    siderum  History     of     Medicine,     London, 

ortu   infausta  quaedam  uel  tristi-  1913.  P-   3i3   et  seq.     I   have   not 

tia  potius  quam  laeta  uel  prospera  seen  A.  Fischer  Aberglauhe  iinter 

miseris  uentura  significari  morta-  den      Angelsaclisen,       Meiningen, 

libus    pene    omnia   ueterum    aesti-  1891,   or    M.    Forster,    Die    Klcin- 

mauit  auctoritas."  littcratur    des    Abcrglauhens    im 

'  HL  VII,  137.  Altenglischen,  in  Archiv.  f.  d.  Stu- 

*  Ernest      Wickersheimer,      Ft-  dium    d.    Netier.    Sprachen,    vol. 
gures      mcdico-astrologiques      des  no,  pp.  346-5S. 

neuvieme,     di'xieme     et     onzicme 


674 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


The  divine 
quaterni- 
ties  of 
Raoul 
Glaber. 


Ram,  the  feet  on  Pisces,  while  the  intervening  members  of 
the  body  are  marked  by  their  respective  signs, — of  these 
Wickersheimer  found  none  before  the  twelfth  century.  But 
in  a  medical  manuscript  of  the  eleventh  century  the  twelve 
signs  with  their  names  and  the  names  of  the  parts  of  the 
human  body  to  which  they  apply  are  grouped  about  a  half 
figure  of  Christ,  who  has  His  right  hand  raised  to  bless, 
while  about  His  head  is  a  halo  or  sun-disk  with  twelve  rays.^ 
Less  favorable  to  astrology  is  the  accompanying  legend, 
"According  to  the  ravings  of  the  philosophers  the  twelve 
signs  are  thus  denoted."  On  the  page  following  the  text  de- 
scribes the  twelve  signs  "according  to  the  Gentiles."  Schemes 
in  which  the  world,  the  year,  and  man  were  associated,  and 
where  are  shown  the  four  elements,  four  seasons,  four 
humors,  four  temperaments,  four  ages,  four  cardinal 
points,  and  four  winds,  are  frequently  found  in  extant  manu- 
scripts of  the  ninth,  tenth,  and  eleventh  centuries.^ 

Such  association  reminds  one  of  the  opening  of  the 
chronicle  of  Raoul  Glaber,  written  in  the  eleventh  century, 
"Since  we  are  to  treat  of  events  in  the  four  quarters  of 
the  earth,  it  will  be  well  to  touch  first  upon  the  power  of 
divine  and  abstract  quaternity."  There  are  four  elements, 
he  gives  us  to  understand,  four  virtues  and  four  senses. 
There  are  four  Gospels  and  they  have  their  relation  to 
the  four  elements.  Matthew,  dealing  with  Christ's  incarna- 
tion, corresponds  to  earth;  Mark  to  water,  since  it  empha- 
sizes baptism ;  Luke  to  air,  because  it  is  the  longest  Gospel ; 


*  Charles  Singer,  Studies  in  the 
History  and  Method  of  Science, 
Oxford,  1917,  Plate  XV,  opposite 
p.  40,  reproduces  this  illumination. 
The  MS,  BN  7028,  seems  to  have 
once  belonged  to  the  abbey  of  St. 
Hilary  at  Poitiers. 

'  Besides  those  in  France  men- 
tioned by  Wickersheimer  may  be 
noted  two  of  the  tenth  century  at 
Munich:  CLM  18629,  fol._  105, 
"Tabula  cosmica  cum  nominibus 
ventorum,  germanicorum  quo- 
que";  CLM  18764,  fols.  79-80. 
"Schema     de     genitura     mundi." 


Also  Vatic.  Lat.  645,  9th  century, 
fol.  66,  Ventorum  imagines  et  m 
circulo  Adam  in  medio  f erarum ; 
fol.  66v,  Planetarum  figura.  This 
same  MS  contains  a  conjuration 
written  in  a  later  hand  of  the 
eleventh  or  twelfth  century: 
fol.  4v,  "In  nomine  patris.  .  .  . 
Tres  angeli  ambulaverunt  in 
monte.  ..." 

For  such  an  astrological  dia- 
gram in  an  Arabic  work  of  the 
tenth  century  see  E.  G.  Browne 
(1921),   1 17-8. 


XXIX         LATIN  ASTROLOGY  AND  DIVINATION  675 

and  John  to  fire  or  ether  as  the  most  spiritual.  In  like 
manner  can  be  associated  with  the  four  cardinal  virtues 
those  four  famous  rivers  which  had  their  sources  in  Para- 
dise :  Phison  and  prudence,  Geon  and  temperance,  the  Tigris 
and  fortitude,  the  Euphrates  and  justice.  Finally  the  ages 
of  the  world  are  found  to  be  four  by  Raoul,  instead  of  the 
six  eras  corresponding  to  the  days  of  creation  which  we 
find  in  Isidore,  Bede,  and  other  medieval  historians ;  and 
these  four  ages  also  relate  to  the  four  virtues.  The  days  of 
Abel,  Enoch,  and  Noah  were  days  of  prudence;  but  on 
leaving  Noah  we  have  temperance  marking  the  age  of  Abra- 
ham and  the  patriarchs ;  fortitude  is  the  feature  of  the  time 
of  Moses  and  the  prophets;  while  justice  characterizes  the 
period  since  the  incarnation  of  the  Word. 

The  faith  of  Raoul  and  his  contemporaries  in  the  mystic  Celestial 
significance  of  numbers,  if  not  also  in  astrology,  and  the  a°a*other 
fact  that  they  were  constantly  on  the  lookout  for  portents  marvels, 
and  prodigies,  are  further  attested  by  the  stress  laid  in  his 
chronicle  upon  the  thousandth  anniversaries  of  Christ's  birth 
and  of  His  passion.  Says  Raoul,  "After  the  multiplicity 
of  prodigies  which,  although  some  came  a  little  before  and 
some  a  trifle  afterwards,  happened  in  the  world  around  the 
thousandth  year  of  Christ  the  Lord,  there  were  many  in- 
dustrious men  of  sagacious  mind  who  prophesied  that  there 
would  be  others  not  inferior  to  these  in  the  thousandth  year 
of  our  Lord's  passion."  That  they  were  not  mistaken  in 
this  premonition  he  shows  later  by  several  chapters,  includ- 
ing an  account  of  the  eclipse  of  the  sun  in  that  year.  Like 
many  another  medieval  historian,  Raoul  is  careful  to  note 
the  appearance  of  comets — in  the  Bayeux  tapestry  of  the 
same  century  one  marks  the  death  of  Edward  the  Confessor; 
Raoul  also  believes  that  if  a  living  person  is  visited  by 
spirits,  either  good  or  evil,  it  is  a  sign  of  his  approaching 
death ;  he  holds  the  usual  view  that  demons  may  sometimes 
work  marvels  by  divine  permission,  and  tells  of  a  magician- 
impostor  whom  he  saw  work  miracles  upon  pseudo-relics. 


676 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


An 

eleventh 

century 

calendar. 


Astrology 
and  divi- 
nation in 
ecclesias- 
tical 
Compoti. 


But  from  the  superstition  of  medieval  chroniclers  we  must 
turn  back  to  astrological  manuscripts  proper. 

An  eleventh  century  calendar  at  Amiens  ^  reveals  both 
a  simple  form  of  astrological  medicine  and  a  belief  in  some 
peculiar  significance  of  the  number  seven,  whether  as  a 
sacred  or  an  astrological  number.  At  the  head  of  each 
month  are  brief  instructions  as  to  what  herbs  to  use  during 
that  month,  as  to  bleeding  and  bathing,  and  what  disease 
may  most  easily  be  cured  then.^  In  the  same  manuscript 
one  miniature  shows  someone  striking  seven  bells  with  a 
hammer,  perhaps  as  notes  in  a  scale,  and  another  miniature 
represents  a  seven-branched  candlestick,  of  which  the 
branches  are  respectively  labeled,  "Spirit  of  piety,  Spirit  of 
fortitude,  Spirit  of  intellect,  Spirit  of  wisdom,  Spirit  of 
prudence,  Spirit  of  science,  Spirit  of  the  fear  of  God."  ^ 

Indeed  works  of  astrology  and  divination  are  especially 
likely  to  be  found  in  the  same  manuscripts  with  ecclesiastical 
calendars  and  coniputi.  Computus  or  compotus,  as  one 
manuscript  states,  was  "the  science  considering  times."  * 
For  example,  in  a  brief  compotus  of  the  ninth  century  ^  a 
divining  sphere  of  Pythagoras  occurs  twice,  and  we  have 
also  a  moon  book,  an  account  of  the  Egyptian  days,  and  a 
method  of  divination  from  winds.  In  a  twelfth  century 
manuscript,^  sandwiched  in  between  calendars  and  reckon- 
ings of  Easter  and  eclipses  and  Bede's  work  On  the  Natures 
of  Things,  are  a  sphere  of  divination,  an  account  of  Egyp- 
tian days,  a  method  of  divination  from  thunder,  and  a  por- 
tion of  a  work  on  judicial  astrology  beginning  with  the 
eleventh  chapter  which  tells  how  to  determine  whether  any- 
one will  be  poor  or  rich  by  inspection  of  the  planet  in  his 
nativity.'^ 


*  Amiens,  fends  Lescalopier,  2, 
nth  century,  fols.  1-12. 

^  For  instance,  for  February, 
"Bibe  agrimoniam  et  apii  semen ; 
oculos  turbulentos  sanare  debes" : 
for  March,  "Merum  dulce  primum 
bibe,  assum  balneum  usita,  san- 
guinem  non  minuas,  ruta  et  leves- 


tico  utere." 

^  Ibid.,  fols.  II  and  19. 

■•  Pembroke  278,  early  14th  cen- 
tury, fol.  25,  "Compotus  est  sci- 
encia  considerans  tempora." 

°  BN  nouv.  acq.  1616,  14  leaves. 

'BN  7299 A. 

'  BN  7299A,  fols,  35v,  37V,  s6r. 


XXIX         LATIN  ASTROLOGY  AND  DIVINATION 


677 


The  very  dating  of  Easter  itself  might  be  the  occasion 
for  indulging  in  mystic  speculation  of  a  semi-astrological 
nature.  Thus  Notker  Labeo,  c  950-1022,  the  well-known 
monk  of  St.  Gall/  in  a  treatise  to  his  disciple  Erkenhard 
on  four  questions  of  compotus,~  states  that  the  principal 
problem,  with  which  all  others  are  connected,  is  that  of 
the  date  of  Easter.  He  gives  the  time  as  in  the  first  full 
moon  after  the  vernal  equinox,  but  adds  that  this  is 
because  of  a  certain  mystery.  For  if  there  were  no  mys- 
tery connected  with  the  date  of  Easter,  and  it  merely  cele- 
brated like  other  festivals  the  memory  of  an  event  which 
once  happened,  there  is  no  doubt  but  that  it  would  occur 
every  year  without  variation  upon  the  twenty-seventh  of 
March,  which  was  the  day  of  the  Lord's  resurrection.  But 
as  after  the  vernal  equinox  the  days  grow  longer  than  the 
nights,  and  as  at  the  full  of  the  moon  its  splendor  is  revolved 
on  high,  so  we  should  overcome  the  darkness  of  sin  by  the 
light  of  piety  and  faith  and  turn  our  minds  from  earthly 
to  celestial  things,  if  we  wish  to  celebrate  Easter  worthily. 

But  let  us  consider  in  more  detail  the  methods  of  divina- 
tion found  in  such  manuscripts.  Simplest  of  all  perhaps 
are  predictions  as  to  the  character  of  the  ensuing  year  ac- 
cording to  the  day  of  the  week  upon  which  the  first  of 
January  falls.  For  example,  "If  the  kalends  of  January 
shall  be  on  the  Lord's  day,  the  winter  will  be  good  and 
mild  and  warm,  the  spring  windy,  and  the  summer  dry. 
Good  vintage,  increasing  flocks;  honey  will  be  abundant; 
the  old  men  will  die;  and  peace  will  be  made."  ^     In  some 


^  Notker  is  especially  famed  for 
his  translations  with  learned  com- 
mentaries from  Latin  into  Ger- 
man, of  which  five  are  extant, 
namely:  The  Consolation  of  Phi- 
losophy of  Boethius,  The  Mar- 
riage of  Mercury  and  Philology 
of  Martianus  Capella,  the  Psalter, 
and  Aristotle,  De  catcgoriis  and 
De  hiterprctatione :  see  Piper,  Die 
Schriften  Notkers,  Freiburg,  1882- 
1883,  vols.  MIL 


^  BN  nouv.  acq.  229,  fols.  lov- 
14V.  Notker  erkenhardo  dis- 
cipulo  de  nil  guestionibus  com- 
poti.  It  seems  not  to  have  been 
printed. 

'Cotton  Tiberius  A,  III,  a  MS 
written  in  various  hands  before 
the  Norman  conquest,  partly  in 
Latin  and  partly  in  Anglo-Saxon, 
and  containing  among  other 
things  the  Colloquy  of  Aelfric 
Our    item    occurs    at    fol.    34r    in 


Notker 
on  the 
mystic 
date  of 
Easter. 


Prediction 
from  the 
Kalends 
of  Janu- 
ary. 


678 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


manuscripts  these  predictions  concerning  the  weather,  crops, 
wars,  and  king  for  the  ensuing  year  are  called  Suppiitatio 
Esdrae  or  signs  which  God  revealed  to  the  prophet  Esdras.^ 
In  another  manuscript  "  the  weather  for  winter  and  summer 
is  predicted  according  to  the  day  of  the  week  upon  which 
Christmas  falls  and  Lent  begins.  Christmas  of  course  was 
sometimes  regarded  as  the  first  day  of  the  new  year  and  in 
any  case  it  falls  on  the  same  day  of  the  week  as  the  following 
first  of  January.  In  a  ninth  century  manuscript  ^  predic- 
tions for  the  ensuing  year  are  made  according  as  there  is 
wind  in  the  night  on  Christmas  eve  and  the  eleven  nights 
following.  For  instance,  "If  there  is  wind  in  the  night 
on  the  night  of  the  natal  day  of  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ,  in 


Latin  with  an  Anglo-Saxon  inter- 
linear version,  and  at  fol.  39V  in 
Anglo-Saxon  only. 

Cotton  Titus  D,  XXVI,  loth 
century,  fols.  lov-iiv,  gives  a 
slightly  different  version  for  some 
days  of  the  week. 

^  Harleian  3017,  lOth  century, 
fols.  63r-64v,  CLM  6382,  nth 
century,  fol.  42,  Supputatio 
Esdrae;  Incipit,  "Kal.  Jan.  si 
fuerint  dominico  die  hiems  bona 
erit." 

Vatican,  Palat.  Lat.  235,  lO-iith 
century,  fol.  39,  "Subputatio  quam 
subputavit  Esdras  in  templo  Hie- 
rusalem,"  opening,  "Si  in  prima 
feria  fuerint  kl.  lanuarii  hiemps 
bona  erit." 

Also  found  in  Egerton  821,  fol. 
ir,  which  is  of  the  twelfth  cen- 
tury and  adds  a  more  elaborate 
method  of  divination  according  to 
what  planet  rules  the  first  hour  of 
the  first  night  of  January  and 
which  of  its  28  mansions  the  moon 
is  in. 

CLM  9921,  I2th  century,  fol.  i, 
is  a  calendar  with  verses  begin- 
ning, "Jani  prima  dies  et  septima 
fine  timctur." 

*  Sloane  475,  this  portion  per- 
haps nth  century,  fol.  2i7r.  Other 
MSS  of  later  date  than  the  period 
we  are  now  considering  are : 
Harleian  2258,  fol.  191,  "prog- 
nostica    a    die    nativitatis    Domini 


a  luna  et  somniis  petita,"  pre- 
dictions from  Christmas,  the 
moon,  and  dreams.  CUL  1338, 
15th  century,  fol.  65V,  Prognosti- 
cations derived  from  the  day  on 
which  Christmas  falls  (in  Latin)  ; 
fol.  74V,  Prognostications  drawn 
from  the  day  of  the  week  on 
which  the  year  commences,  CU 
Trinity  1109,  14th  century,  fol. 
148,  "Prognostica  anni  sequentis 
ex  die  natalium  Domini." 

^  BN  nouv.  acq.  1616,  9th  cen- 
tury, fol.  I2V.  Similar  later  MSS 
are : 

Digby  86,  13th  century,  fols. 
32-4,  Prognosticatio  ex  vento  in 
nocte  Natalis  Domini,  and  fols. 
40v-4ir,  "Les  singnes  del  jour  do 
Nouel,"  predictions  in  French  ac- 
cording to  the  day  of  the  week  on 
which  Christmas  falls. 

Digby  88,  15th  century,  fol.  77, 
"Howe  all  ye  yere  ys  rewlyde  by 
the  day  that  Christemas  day 
fallythe  on,"  and  fol.  4or,  "Prog- 
nostication from  the  sight  of  the 
sun  on  Christmas  and  the  ten  days 
following"  (Prognosticatio  ex 
visione  solis  in  die  Natalis  Dom- 
ini et  in  decern  diebus  subsequen- 
tibus),  and_  fol.  75,  a  poem  of 
prognostications  for  Christmas 
day.  This  same  MS  contains  a 
large  number  of  other  brief 
anonymous  treatises  in  the  fields 
of  astrology  and  divination. 


XXIX         LATIN  ASTROLOGY  AND  DIVINATION  679 

that  year  kings  and  pontiffs  will  perish,"  and  "If  on  twelfth 
night  there  shall  be  wind,  kings  will  perish  in  war." 

Divination  from  thunder  is  another  form  of  judicial  Other 
astrology,  if  it  may  so  be  called,  found  in  these  early  manu-  by  the 
scripts.  Perhaps  the  simplest  variety  of  it  is  according  to  ^^y  °^ 
the  day  of  the  week  on  which  thunder  is  heard. ^  Pre- 
dictions were  also  made  according  to  the  month  in  which 
thunder  was  heard,^  or  the  direction  from  which  it  was 
heard.^  It  may  be  recalled  that  the  three  chapters  of  Bede's 
translation  of  some  work  on  divination  from  thunder  had 
been  respectively  devoted  to  these  three  methods  by  the  di- 
rection from  which  the  thunder  is  heard,  the  month,  and  the 
day  of  the  week.  Nativities  of  infants  are  also  given  ac- 
cording to  the  day  of  the  week  on  which  they  are  born,  and 
further  taking  into  account  whether  the  hour  of  birth  is 
diurnal  or  nocturnal.'*  It  is  also  regarded  as  important  to 
note  upon  which  day  of  the  week  the  new  moon  occurs,^ 
and  we  are  further  informed  of  the  various  hours  of  the 
days  of  the  week  when  it  is  advisable  to  perform  blood- 
letting.® In  a  method  of  divination  according  to  the  day 
of  the  week  and  the  letters  in  the  boy's  or  girl's  name  the 
Lord's  day  is  assigned  the  number  thirteen,  the  day  "of 
the  moon"  eighteen,  and  that  "of  Mars"  fifteen."^     Since 

*  Titus  D,  XXVI,  fol.  9v.  Ti-  we  are  told  of  what  the  Egyptians 
berius  A,  III,  fols.  38r  and  35r.  write,  and  of  famine  in  Babylon. 
Cockayne,  Leechdonis  etc..  Ill,  In  CUL  1687,  I3-I4th  century, 
150-295,  in  RS  vol.  35,  published  fols.  68v-69r,  Latin  verses  con- 
this  and  a  number  of  other  ex-  taining  prognostications  concern- 
tracts  from  Tiberius  A,  III,  and  ing  thunder  are  followed  by  "a 
other  early  English  MSS.  list  of  the  number  of  quarters  of 

Vienna  2245,  12th  century,  fols.  flour,  beer,  etc.,  used  in  the  year 

59r-69v    are    devoted    to    various  at  the  monastery"  and  by  "a  note 

prognostications,    beginning    with,  on  the  symbolism  of  the  pastoral 

"Three   days   are   to  be   observed  staff." 

above    all     others,"     and     ending  ^  Combined  with  the  method  by 

with,  "Thunder  at  dawn  signifies  the  day  of  the  week  in  BN  7299A, 

the   birth   of   a  king."     A  dream  12th  century,  fol.  37V. 
book   by   Daniel   follows   at   fols.         *  Tiberius  A,  III,  fol.  63r ;  Vati- 

69V-75r.  can  Palat.  Lat.  235,  fol.  40. 

'Vatican    Palat.    Lat.     235,  fol.  °  Tiberius  A,  III,  fol.  38V. 

40,  "In  mense  lanuario  si  tonitru  "  Sloane  475,  fol.  I35v. 

fuerit."      In     Egerton    821,     12th  ^  Sloane    475,     fol.     i33r.      The 

century,  the  significance  of  thun-  method    is    almost    identical    with 

der    is    given    according    to    the  that    of   the   spheres   of    life   and 

twelve   signs   of   the   zodiac,   and  death,   of    which   we   shall   speak 


68o 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


the  days  of  the  week  bore  the  names  of  the  planets,  it  was 
not  strange  that  they  should  have  been  credited  with  some- 
thing of  the  virtues  of  the  stars. 

A  commoner  method  of  divination  and  one  more  nearly 
approaching  approved  astrological  doctrine  was  that  by  the 
day  of  the  month  or  moon.  Briefest  of  such  moon-books 
is  that  which  merely  designates  each  of  the  thirty  days  as 
favorable  or  unfavorable.^  We  also  find  a  Lunarium  for 
the  sick,  stating  the  patient's  prospects  from  the  day  of 
the  moon  on  which  he  contracted  his  illness ;  ^  a  work  as- 
cribed to  "Saint  Daniel"  on  nativities  by  the  day  of  the 
moon;  ^  and  an  equally  brief  interpretation  of  dreams  upon 
the  same  basis. ^  Or  all  these  matters  may  be  considered  in 
the  same  treatise  and  each  of  them  somewhat  more  fully, 
and  we  may  be  told  whether  the  day  is  a  good  one  on  which 
to  buy  and  sell,  to  board  a  ship,  to  enter  a  city,  to  operate 
upon  a  patient,  to  send  children  off  to  school,  to  breed  ani- 
mals, to  build  an  aqueduct  or  mill,  or  whether  it  is  best  to 


presently.  In  CU  Trinity  987, 
The  Canterbury  Psalter,  about 
1150  A.  D.,  the  value  assigned 
Dies  So  lis  is  24. 

^  Vatic.  Palat.  Lat.  235,  fol.  40, 
"De  lunae  observatione :  Luna  I 
omnibus  rebus  agendis  utilis." 

Tiberius  A,  III,  fol.  G^r,  where, 
however,  such  parts  of  the  day 
as  morning  and  evening  are  fur- 
ther   distinguished. 

Vatic.  Palat.  Lat.  485,  9th  cen- 
tury, fol.  15V,  "Ad  sanguinem 
minuendum,"  merely  states  which 
days  of  the  moon  are  favorable 
or  unfavorable  for  blood-letting. 

St.  John's  17,  1 1 10  A.  D.,  fol.  4, 
Luna  quibus  diebus  bona  est  et 
quibus  non;  fol.  154V,  a  table  of 
lucky  and  unlucky  numbers. 

'  Harleian  3017,  fol.  sSv ;  the 
Incipit  states  that  it  is  by  the  same 
author  as  the  preceding  Sphere  of 
Pythagoras  and  Apuleius. 

Titus  D,  XXVI,  fol.  8. 

Cotton  Caligula  A,  XV,  loth 
century,  fol.  121V,  Latin  and 
Anglo-Saxon. 

Egerton    821,     fol.     32r,     is     a 


twelfth  century  instance. 

The  method  seems  combined  or 
confused  with  the  Egyptian  days 
in  Vatic.  Palat.  Lat.  485,  9th  cen- 
tury, fol.  13V,  "Dies  aegyptiaci. 
Signa  in  quibus  aegrotus  an  peri- 
clitare  aut  evadere  non  potest," 
but  opening,  "Luna  I.  qui  ceciderit 
in  infirmitatem  difficile  euadit." 

*  Harleian  3017,  fol.  58V,  "In- 
cipit lunarium  sancti  danihel  de 
nativitate  infantium.  Luna  I  qui 
f  uerit  natus  vitalis  erit ;  Luna 
II,  mediocris  erit  .  .  .  Luna  IIII, 
tractator  regum  erit  .  .  .  Luna 
XII,  religiosus  erit  .  .  .  Luna 
XXX,  negotias  multas  tracta- 
bit." 

Tiberius  A,  III,  fols.  63r  and 
34V. 

Titus  D,  XXVI,  fols.  7v  and 
6v. 

'Tiberius  A,  III,  fol.  33v- 
Titus  D,  XXVI,  fol.  9r.  CLM 
6382,  nth  century,  fol.  42,  De 
somni  ueris  uel  mendosis  quidam 
incipiunt  in  aetatibus  lunae  ex- 
ploratis. 


XXIX 


LATIN  ASTROLOGY  AND  DIVINATION 


68i 


abstain  on  it  from  most  business.  Also  such  predictions  as 
that  the  boy  born  on  that  day  will  be  illustrious,  astute,  wise, 
and  lettered ;  that  he  will  encounter  danger  on  the  water,  but 
will  live  to  old  age  if  he  escapes;  while  the  girl  born  on  the 
same  day  will  be  "chaste,  benign,  good-looking,  and  pleasing 
to  men."  That  anyone  who  takes  to  his  bed  on  that  day 
will  suffer  a  long  sickness,  but  that  it  is  a  favorable  day  for 
blood-letting,  and  that  one  should  not  worry  about  dreams 
he  has  then,  since  they  possess  no  significance  either  for 
good  or  evil.  Also  what  chance  there  is  of  recovering 
articles  stolen  on  that  day.-^  In  later  manuscripts  at  least  it 
is  further  stated  that  certain  Biblical  characters  were  born 
on  this  day  or  that  day  of  the  moon :  Adam  on  the  first.  Eve 
on  the  second,  Cain  on  the  third,  Abel  on  the  fourth,  and  so 

2 


on 

*  Tiberius  A,  III,  fols.  30V-33V, 
"Finiunt  somnia  danielis  proph- 
ete." 

Sloane  475,  fols.  21 1-6,  is  almost 
identical,  but  I  believe  does  not 
mention  Daniel  as  its  author. 

Vatic.   Palat.  Lat.  235,  fol.  39V. 

BN  nouv.  acq.  1616,  9th  cen- 
tury, is  roughly  similar  but  names 
no  author  and  does  not  distinguish 
the  fates  of  boys  and  girls.  It 
usually  states  whether  slaves  who 
run  away  and  thieves  who  steal 
on  the  day  in  question  will  be 
caught  or  escape.  It  opens  and 
closes  thus  :  "Luna  prima  qui  in- 
cenditur  in  ipsa  sanabitur  et  bona 
et  in  omnibus  dare  et  accipere  et 
nubere  et  navigare  in  mare  et 
vendere  et  emere  et  omnis  qui- 
cumque  fugerit  in  ipsa  aut  servus 
aut  liber  non  poterit  sed  capitur 
aut  qui  incendit  incendio  sana- 
bitur (presumably  an  allusion  to 
the  medical  practice  of  cauteriza- 
tion) et  qui  natus  fuerit  vitalis 
erit  .../...  Luna  XXX  bona 
est  ambulare  in  piscatione  et  qui 
fugit  post  multos  annos  rever- 
titur  in  loco  suo  et  qui  natus 
fuerit  dives  erit  et  honoratissimus 
erit  et  qui  incadit  aut  manducet 
aut  non  vivet  periculo  mortis 
habebit." 

Titus   D,   XXVII,   fols.   22-25r, 


"judicia  de  diebus  quibusdam 
cuiusque  mensis" ;  fols.  27-9,  "ar- 
gumentum  lunare,  quando  et 
qualiter  observentur  tempora  ad 
res  agendas." 

Of  the  twelfth  century,  Vienna 
2532,  fols.  55-9,  "Luna  I.  Hec  dies 
omnibus  egrotantibus  utilis  est 
.../...  Puer  natus  negotia 
multa  sectabit." 

'  Sloane  2461,  end  of  13th  cen- 
tury, fols.  62-4.  No  Biblical  char- 
acter is  mentioned  for  the  fifth 
and  sixth  days,  but  we  are  told 
that  on  the  seventh  day  of  the 
moon  Abel  was  slain  by  Cain. 

BN  3660A,  i6th  century,  fols. 
53r-57r,  ascribes  the  birth  of 
Nebuchadnezzar  to  the  fifth  day, 
leaves  the  sixth  blank,  has  Abel 
slain  on  the  seventh,  Methusaleh 
born  on  the  eighth,  Lamech  on  the 
ninth,  and  so  on. 

Egerton  821,  12th  century,  fol. 
I2r,  "Natus  est  Samuel  proph- 
eta.  .  .  ." 

Digby  88,  15th  century,  fol.  62r, 
has  English  verses  beginning: 

"God  made  Adam  the  fyrst  day 
of  the  moone, 
And  the  second  day  Eve  good 
dedis  to  doone." 
A  similar  poem  occurs  at  fol.  64 
of  the  same  MS  and  in  Ashmole 
189,  fol.  213V. 


682 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


In  the  early  manuscripts  moon-books  are  anonymous  or 
ascribed  to  Daniel,  but  in  later  medieval  manuscripts  other 
authors  are  named.  The  name  of  Adam  is  coupled  with 
that  of  Daniel  in  both  of  two  rather  elaborate  moon-books 
in  a  fourteenth  century  manuscript,^  where  Adam  is  said 
to  have  worked  out  these  "  lunations"  "by  true  experience." 
A  fifteenth  century  one  is  attributed  to  a  philosopher,  as- 
trologer, and  physician  named  Edris,^  perhaps  the  Esdras 
of  the  method  of  divination  by  the  kalends  of  January  rather 
than  the  Arab  Edrisi.  It  briefly  predicts  from  the  relation 
of  the  moon  to  the  twelve  signs  whether  patients  will  re- 
cover and  captives  escape.  In  a  sixteenth  century  manu- 
script at  Paris  are  "Significations  of  the  days  of  the  moon 
which  the  most  excellent  astronomer  Bezogar  revealed  to 
his  disciples  and  transmitted  to  them  as  a  very  great  secret 
and  most  precious  gift."  ^  But  such  an  ascription  is  rather 
obviously  a  late  fiction. 

Determining  the  fate  of  the  patient  from  the  day  of  the 
moon  upon  which  his  illness  was  incurred  enters  also  into 
certain  spheres  of  life  and  death  which  were  much  em- 
ployed in  the  early  middle  ages.  But  in  these  the  number 
of  the  day  of  the  moon  is  combined  with  a  second  number 
obtained  by  a  numerical  evaluation  of  the  letters  forming 
the  patient's  name.  This  method  came  down  from  the 
ancient  Greek-speaking  world,  as  in  a  "Sphere  of  Democ- 
ritus,  prognostic  of  life  and  death"  found  in  a  Leyden 
papyrus,*  while  the  very  similar  Sphere  of  Petosiris,  the 


^Ashmole  361,  mid  14th  cen- 
tury, fols.  156V-158V,  "Iste  sunt 
lunaciones  quas  Adam  primus 
homo  disposuit  secundum  veram 
experientiam  quam  etiam  suis 
filiis  tradidit  et  quam  maxima 
Abel  et  ceteris  de  posteritate  ad 
quos  etiam  concordavit  Daniel 
propheta  .  .  .";  fol.  159,  "Modo 
agitur  de  numero  lune  ad  viden- 
dum  que  sit  bona  vel  que  mala  et 
usum  istarum  lunacionum  invene- 
runt  Adam  et  Daniel  propheta." 

'Canon.  Misc.  517,  fol.  3Sr, 
"Incipit     scientia    edita    ab     edri 


philosopho  astrologo  et  medico." 
'BN  3660A,  fols.  53r-57r.  In 
the  catalogue  of  Ashburnham 
MSS  at  Florence  the  name  of 
Giovannino  di  Graziano  is  con- 
nected with  a  moon-book  in  Ash- 
burnham 130,  I3-I5th  century, 
fols.  25-6,  "Luna  prima  Adam 
natus  fuit.  .  ,  ."  But  perhaps 
this  name  should  go  only  with 
some  prognostications,  exorcisms, 
and  recipes  which  occur  at  the 
close  of  the  predictions  for  the 
thirty  days  of  the  moon. 
*Ed.  Leemans,  1833-18S5. 


versions. 


XXIX         LATIN  ASTROLOGY  AND  DIVINATION  683 

mythical  Egyptian  astrologer,  is  variously  dated  by  W. 
Kroll  from  the  second  century  before  Christ,  by  E.  Riess 
from  the  first  century  before  Christ,  and  by  F.  Boll  in  the 
first  century  of  our  era.^  The  so-called  "Sphere"  is  really 
only  a  wheel  of  fortune,  circle,  or  other  plane  figure  divided 
into  compartments  where  different  numbers  are  grouped 
under  such  headings  as  "Life"  and  "Death."  Having 
calculated  the  value  of  a  person's  name  by  adding  together 
the  Greek  numerals  represented  by  its  component  letters, 
and  having  further  added  in  the  day  of  the  moon,  one 
divides  the  sum  by  some  given  divisor  and  looks  for  the 
quotient  in  the  compartments.  This  method  of  divination 
was  also  employed  in  regard  to  fugitive  slaves  and  the  out- 
come of  gladiatorial  combats.^ 

In  the  medieval  Latin  versions  of  these  Spheres  of  life  Medieval 
and  death  the  numerical  value  of  the  Greek  letters  was  nat- 
urally usually  lost  and  arbitrary  numerical  equivalents  were 
assigned  to  the  Roman  letters  or  some  other  method  of 
calculation  was  substituted.  The  Sphere  of  Petosiris  was 
perpetuated  in  the  form  of  a  letter  by  him  to  Nechepso, 
king  of  Egypt. ^  But  more  common  than  this  in  manu- 
scripts of  the  ninth,  tenth,  and  eleventh  centuries  was  the 
Sphere  of  life  and  death  of  Apuleius  or  Pythagoras  or 
both'*  which  replaced  that  of  Democritus.  Like  it,  it  con- 
sisted of  the  numbers  from  one  to  thirty  arranged  in  six 
compartments,  three  above  a  line  each  containing  six  num- 
bers, and  three  below  the  line  having  four  each.  John 
of  Salisbury,  in  the  twelfth  century,  presumably  refers  to 

''Bouche-Leclercq     (1899),    537-  of   Nechepso  and  Petosiris    (Phi- 

42;    (1879- 1882),   I,   258-65.     Ber-  lologus,     Suppl.     VI,      1891-1893, 

thelot,   Alchiniistcs  grecs    (1888),  pp.      382-3)      from      Cod.      Laur. 

I,  86-90.     K.   Sudhoff   (1902),  pp.  XXXVIII,  24,  9-ioth  century,  fol. 

4-6.  174V.     Wickersheimer   (1913),  PP- 

^Arundel  319,   13th  century,  fol.  315-7,  notes   BN   17868,   loth  cen- 

2r,  Versus  de  faustis  vel  infaus-  tury,  fol.  13.     For  other  MSS  see 

tis    nominibus    pugnantium,    is    a  Appendix  I  to  this  chapter, 

medieval  Latin  example.  ■*  Printed     by     Paul     Lehmann, 

'  Printed     among     treatises     of  Apidciusfragmente,         Hermes 

dubious    or    spurious    authorship  XLIX  (1914),  612-20.     For  a  list 

with  Bede's  works,  Migne,  PL  90,  of  some  MSS  of  it  see  Appendix 

963-6;     and     more     recently     in  I  at  the  close  of  this  chapter. 
Riess'    edition    of    the    fragments 


684 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


it  when  he  speaks  of  divination  or  lot-casting  "by  inspec- 
tion of  the  so-called  Pythagorean  table" ;  ^  and  it  continues 
to  be  found  with  great  frequency  in  the  manuscripts  of 
subsequent  centuries.^  It  is  not  to  be  confused,  however, 
with  the  Prenostica  Pitagorice,  a  more  elaborate,  although 
somewhat  similar,  method  of  divination  by  means  of 
geomantic  tables,  of  which  we  shall  treat  later  in  the  chapter 
on  Bernard  Silvester.  A  Sphere  ascribed  to  St.  Donatus 
in  a  twelfth  century  manuscript  includes  instructions  how 
to  determine  the  sign  of  the  zodiac  under  which  a  person 
was  born  by  computing  the  difference  between  his  name 
and  his  mother's  name.  If  this  amounts  to  four  letters, 
he  was  born  under  the  fourth  sign,  and  so  on.^ 

The  survival  of  such  superstitious  methods  of  divina- 
tion into  the  later  middle  ages  is  attested  not  only  by  the 
frequent  recurrence  of  the  Sphere  of  Apideius  and  the 
divinations  from  the  kalends  of  January  in  manuscripts  of 
the  later  centuries,  but  by  the  medical  notebook,  written 
in  middle  English,  of  John  Crophill,  who  practiced  medicine 
in  Suffolk  under  Henry  IV.*  Besides  a  record  of  his 
patients  and  the  sums  of  money  due  from  them,  rules  of 
dieting  and  blood-letting  for  the  twelve  months  of  the  year, 
and  his  "more  regular  and  masterly  observations  upon 
Urin,"  his  notes  include  a  treatise  on  astrological  medicine 
which,  in  the  sarcastic  language  of  the  old  catalogue  of 
the  Harleian  Manuscripts,  concludes  "with  a  masterpiece 
of  art,  namely,  a  tretys  or  chapter  of  'Calculation  to  know 


^  Polycraticus  I,  13,  ed.  Webb, 
I,  54.  Mr.  Webb  in  a  note  refers 
to  an  article  in  a  German  periodi- 
cal (K.  Gillert,  Neues  Archiv  d. 
Gesellschaft  f.  altere  deutsche 
Geschichtskunde,  V,  254)  concern- 
ing a  MS  of  the  Sphere  of  Py- 
thagoras preserved  at  Petrograd, 
but  says  nothing  of  the  MSS  in 
the  British  Museum  listed  in  Ap- 
pendix I  to  this  chapter, — a  good 
illustration  of  the  unnecessary  ob- 
sequiousness of  English  towards 
German  scholarship  which  has 
frequently  prevailed  in  the  past. 


*  A  few  of  them  will  be  found 
listed  in  Appendix  I  to  this  chap- 
ter. 

^  Egerton  821,  12th  century,  f  ol. 
i5r,  "Hec  est  spera  quod  fecit 
sanctus  Donatus.  Quicumque 
egrotare  incipit.  .  .  ."  It  is  fol- 
lowed on  the  next  page  by  the 
usual  figure  for  the  Sphere  of 
Apulcius. 

*  Harleian  1735 ;  the  passages 
referred  to  in  the  following  ac- 
count occur  at  fols.  36V,  41,  43, 
29,  44V,  40,  and  39V  respectively. 


XXIX         LATIN  ASTROLOGY  AND  DIVINATION  685 

what  thou  wilt,'  and  this  by  observation  of  persons'  names." 
The  notebook  also  contains  "Oracular  Answers  prepared 
beforehand  by  this  great  Doctor  for  those  of  both  Sexes 
who  shall  come  to  consult  him  in  the  momentous  affair  of 
Matrimony;  according  to  the  several  Months  of  the  year 
wherein  they  should  apply  themselves."  Further  contents 
are  an  incantation  in  Latin  for  women  in  child-birth,  and 
"The  names  of  the  12  signs  with  such  marks  as  shew  that 
this  John  Crophill  was  a  dabbler  in  Geomancy." 

Brief  lists  of  "Egyptian  Days"  are  of  rather  common  Egyptian 
occurrence  in  both  Latin  and  Anglo-Saxon  manuscripts  of  ^^^" 
the  ninth,  tenth,  and  succeeding  centuries.^  Often  it  is 
merely  stated  what  days  of  the  year  they  are;  sometimes 
it  is  simply  added  that  the  doctor  should  not  bleed  the  pa- 
tient upon  them.  As  early  as  a  ninth  century  manuscript.^ 
however,  we  are  further  warned  not  to  take  a  walk  or  plant 
or  carry  on  a  lawsuit  or  do  any  work  upon  these  days. 
And  under  no  circumstances,  no  matter  what  the  seeming 
necessity,  is  it  permitted  to  bleed  man  or  beast  on  these 
days.  Two  Egyptian  days  are  then  listed  for  each  month, 
one  reckoned  as  so  many  days  from  the  beginning  and  the 
other  as  so  many  days  before  the  close  of  the  month.  Eleven 
days  is  the  farthest  removed  that  any  Egyptian  day  is  from 
the  first  of  the  month  and  twelve  the  most  from  the  close, 
so  that  they  never  fall  in  the  middle  of  a  month  nor  on  the 
very  first  or  last  day.  Our  ninth  century  manuscript  then 
mentions  three  of  these  days  in  April,  August,  and  Decem- 
ber as  especially  dangerous.  Whoever  falls  ill  or  receives 
a  potion  on  them  is  sure  to  die  soon.  Whoever,  male  or 
female,  is  born  on  one  of  them  will  die  an  evil  and  painful 
death.  "And  if  one  drinks  water  on  those  three  days,  he 
will  die  within  forty  days."  The  account  then  closes  with 
the  statement  that  on  the  Egyptian  days  the  people  of  Egypt 
were  cursed  with  Pharaoh.    In  another  ninth  century  manu- 

*See  Appendix  II  to  this  chap-      notes. 
ter  for  a  list  of  MSS  other  than  ^  BN   nouv.   acq.    1616,   9th  cen- 

those  mentioned  in  the  following      tury,   fol.   I2r. 


686  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

script  a  bare  list  of  the  Egyptian  days  is  followed  by  a 
somewhat  similar  account  of  the  three  which  must  be  ob- 
served with  especial  care.^  In  a  calendar  of  saints'  days  in 
this  same  manuscript  only  the  third  of  March  and  the  third 
of  July  are  marked  dies  egiptiaffus.^  Egyptian  days  are 
also  marked  in  the  calendar  of  Marianus  Scotus,  the  well- 
known  chronicler  and  chronologist.^  A  somewhat  different 
account  in  a  twelfth  century  manuscript  states  that  "these 
are  the  days  which  God  sent  without  mercy."  It  also,  how- 
ever, lists  two  of  them  for  each  month  and  distinguishes  the 
three  in  April,  August,  and  December  as  especially  dan- 
gerous.* 
Their  There  seems  to  be  no  doubt  that  these  Egyptian  days 

history.  -were  a  relic  of  the  unlucky  days  in  the  ancient  Egyptian 
calendar,^  of  which  we  learn  from  several  papyri,  although 
of  course  the  ancient  Egyptians  were  also  accustomed  to 
distinguish  further  the  three  divisions  of  each  day  as  lucky 
or  unlucky.  The  Egyptian  days  are  noted  in  official  calen- 
dars of  the  Roman  Empire  about  354  A.  D.,  and  in  the 
Fasti  Philocaliarci  there  are  twenty-five  in  all,  of  which  three 
fall  in  January.  In  the  middle  ages,  as  has  already  been 
illustrated,  there  were  usually  but  twenty-four,  two  to  each 
month.®  They  were  mentioned  in  the  Life  of  Proclns  by 
Marinus,  and  both  Ambrose  and  Augustine  testified  that 
many  Christians  still  had  faith  in  them.'^  Indeed,  they 
passed  into  the  ecclesiastical  calendar,  as  the  Franciscan, 
Bartholomew  of  England,  states  in  the  thirteenth  century.^ 

*Digby  63,  end  of  9th  century,  another  isth  century  MS. 

f  ol.  36.  ""  Cited       by       Bouche-Leclercq, 

'Ibid.,  fols.  40-5.  L'Astrologie    grecque,     1899,     pp. 

"CU  Trinity  1369,  nth  century,  485-6,  623. 

fol.  IV.  ^  De  proprietatibus  rerum,  1488, 

*BN"  7299A,    i2th   century,   fol.  Lindelbach,    Heidelberg,    IX,    20. 

37V.  This  is  not  to  say,  however,  that 

"For     further     information     on  they    always    appear    in    medieval 

this    point    see    Budge,    Egyptian  calendars;  I  did  not  find  them  in 

Magic.   1899,  pp.  225-8;  Webster,  any  of  the  14th  and  isth  century 

Rest  Days,  1916,  pp.  295-7.  calendars       from       Apulia       and 

"Webster    (1916),    pp.    300-301,  lapygia  published  by  G.  M.  Gio- 

however,   speaks  of  30  in  a   14th  vene,    Kalcndaria    Vetera,    Naples, 

century  MS,  32  in  an  English  MS  1828.    His  calendars  consist  of  lit- 

of   Henry   VI's   reign,  and   31   in  tie    save    saints'    days,    although 


XXIX        LATIN  ASTROLOGY  AND  DIVINATION  687 

By  that  time  the  notion  had  become  prevalent  that  they  Medieval 
were  anniversaries  of  the  days  upon  which  God  afflicted  ^^  explain 
Egypt  with  plagues,  as  our  citations  from  the  manuscripts  them, 
have  shown.  Bartholomew,  indeed,  is  at  pains  to  explain 
that  the  days  are  placed  in  the  church  calendar,  "not  be- 
cause one  should  omit  anything  upon  them  more  than  upon 
other  days,  but  in  order  that  God's  miracles  may  be  recalled 
to  memory."  The  circumstance  that  there  are  twenty-four 
days  does  not  embarrass  him;  he  simply  explains  that  this 
proves  that  God  sent  more  plagues  upon  Egypt  than  the  ten 
which  are  especially  famed.  Our  citations  from  earlier 
manuscripts  have  shown  that  most  people  would  not  agree 
with  Bartholomew  that  nothing  should  be  omitted  on  these 
days.  Moreover,  other  explanations  of  their  origin  had 
been  already  given  in  the  middle  ages  than  that  from  the 
plagues  of  Egypt.  Honorius  of  Autun  stated  in  the  twelfth 
century  that  th^y  were  called  Egyptian  days  because  they 
had  been  discovered  by  the  Egyptians,  and  since  Egypt 
means  dark/  they  are  called  tenebrosi,  because  they  are 
declared  to  bring  the  incautious  to  the  shadows  of  death. ^ 
The  Dominican,  Vincent  of  Beauvais,^  who  probably  wrote 
his  encyclopedia  soon  after  that  of  Bartholomew,  did  not 
find  the  discrepancy  between  ten  plagues  and  twenty-four 
days  so  easy  to  explain  away.  He  states  that  of  the  two 
Egyptian  days  in  each  month  one  comes  near  the  beginning 
and  the  other  near  the  close,  as  we  have  already  learned. 
He  adds  that  some  call  them  lucky  days,  while  others  say 
that  the  astrologers  of  Egypt  discovered  that  they  were  un- 
lucky. Yet  another  explanation  of  their  origin  is  that  on 
these  days  the  Egyptians  were  accustomed  to  sacrifice  to 
demons  with  their  own  blood,  a  circumstance  which  would 
not  seem  to  recommend  them  for  inclusion  in  the  ecclesias- 
tical calendar.     Bernard  Gordon,  a  medical  writer  at  the 

in  some  of  them  the  beginning  of  country, 

dog-days  is  marked  and  when  the  'Imago  mundi,  II,  109. 

sun  enters  each  sign  of  the  zodiac.  'Speculum    natiirale,    XVI,    83, 

^  "Black    earth"    was    the   name  printed      by      Anth.       Koburger, 

given   by   the    Egyptians   to   their  Niirnberg,  1485. 


688  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

end  of  the  thirteenth  century,  reverts  to  the  position  that 
the  Egyptian  days  were  in  memory  of  the  plagues  in  Egypt. 
He  declares  that  there  is  no  sense  in  the  prohibition  of 
blood-letting  upon  these  days,  since  they  have  no  astrological 
significance,  but  are  the  anniversaries  of  miracles  worked 
by  special  providence.^  Gilbert  of  England,  earlier  in  the 
thirteenth  century,  had  advised  against  bleeding  on  Egyptian 
days,  if  the  moon  was  then  influenced  by  any  evil  planet.^ 
Other  On  the  other  hand,  not  only  did  the  twenty-four  Egyptian 

days.  days  and  the  three  in  April,  August,  and  December  which 

were  considered  especially  dangerous,  continue  to  be  listed 
in  the  fourteenth  and  fifteenth  century  manuscripts,  but 
imitations  of  them  appeared.  Thus  in  a  fourteenth  cen- 
tury manuscript  we  read  of  forty  perilous  days  which  should 
be  observed  with  the  utmost  care  and  which  Greek  masters 
have  tested  by  experience ;  ^  while  in  a  second  manuscript 
of  the  closing  medieval  period  appear  fifty-eight  dangerous 
days  "according  to  the  Arabs."  *  Of  the  Greek  days  only 
twenty-nine  are  actually  listed,  seven  in  January,  three  in 
February,  and  so  on,  omitting  the  months  of  July  and  Au- 
gust entirely,  which  perhaps  should  contain  the  missing 
eleven  days.^  The  Arabic  days  vary  in  number  per  month 
from  seven  in  March,  which  is  the  first  month  listed,  to  three 
in  February.  "And  there  are  four  other  days  and  nights 
according  to  Bede  on  which  no  one  is  ever  born  or  con- 

^  HL  25,  329.    My  impression  is  75.    Ad-Damiri  states  in  his  zoo- 

that    some    medieval    astronomers  logical    lexicon,     (ed.     A.    S.    G. 

also  denied  to  these  Egyptian  days  Jayaker,    1906,    I,    134)    that    Mo- 

any  astrological  importance,  since  hammed  is  reported  to  have  sgid, 

they  always  came  upon  the  same  "Be  cautious  of  twelve  days  in  the 

days  of   the  months   without  ref-  year,    because    they    are    such    as 

erence  to  the  phases  of  the  moon  cause    the    loss    of    property    and 

or  courses  of  the  other  planets :  bring  on  disgrace  or  dishonor." 
but  I  cannot  put  my  hand  on  such  ^  M.     Hamilton,     Greek     Saints 

passages.  and  Their  Festivals,  1910,  p.   187, 

*And    is    approvingly    cited    to  states  that  "in  all  parts  of   (mod- 

that  effect  by  Arnald  of  Villanova,  ern)    Greece    on    certain    days    of 

Regulae  generates  curationis  mor-  August   and    March   it   is   consid- 

borum.   Doctrina  IV.  ered    necessary    to    abstain    from 

'Ashmole  361,  mid  14th  century,  particular  kinds  of  work  in  order 

fols.  158V-1S9.  to  avoid  disaster." 

*BN    7iZ7,    I4-I5th    century,    p. 


XXIX        LATIN  ASTROLOGY  AND  DIVINATION  689 

ceived,  and  if  by  chance  a  male  is  conceived  or  bom,  its 

body  will  never  be  freed  from  putridity."  ^ 

That  astrological  knowledge  in  England,  at  least  soon   Firmicus 

after  the  Norman  conquest,  was  not  limited  to  such  meager   arch-  '^  ^" 

and  simple  treatises  as  the  moon-books  described  above  from   bishop  of 

X  ork 
Anglo-Saxon  manuscripts,  is  seen  from  the  closing  incident 

in  the  career  of  Gerard,  a  learned  and  eloquent  man,  bishop 
of  Hereford  under  William  Rufus  and  archbishop  of  York 
under  Henry  I,  whom  he  supported  in  the  investiture  strug- 
gle with  Anselm  and  the  pope.  The  story  goes  that  Gerard, 
who  had  been  feeling  slightly  indisposed,  lay  down  to  rest 
and  enjoy  the  fresh  air  and  fragrance  of  the  flowers  in  a 
garden  near  his  palace,  asking  his  chaplains  to  leave  him 
for  a  while.  On  their  return  after  dinner  they  found  him 
dead,  and  beneath  the  cushion  upon  which  his  head  rested 
was  a  copy  of  the  astrological  work  of  Julius  Firmicus 
Maternus.  Gerard  had  not  been  popular  with  the  inhabi- 
tants of  York,  and  when  his  corpse  was  brought  back  to 
town,  boys  stoned  the  bier  and  the  canons  refused  it  burial 
within  the  cathedral,  which,  however,  his  successor  granted. 
"His  enemies,"  we  are  told,  "interpreted  his  death,  without 
the  rites  of  the  church,  as  a  divine  judgment  for  his  addic- 
tion to  magical  and  forbidden  arts."  At  any  rate  the  story 
shows  that  the  work  of  Firmicus  was  well  known  by  this 
time;  it  is  from  the  eleventh  century  that  the  oldest  manu- 
scripts of  it  date;  and  we  suspect  that  some  of  his  enemies 
were  rather  hypocritical  in  the  horror  which  they  expressed 
at  a  bishop's  reading  such  a  book.  "Too  independent  a 
thinker  for  his  contemporaries,"  writes  Miss  Bateson,  "his 
opponents  held  up  their  hands  in  horror  that  an  astrological 

^  Mention  may  perhaps  be  made  citizens  of  Abbeville  won  a  law- 
in  this  connection  of  the  "Tobias  suit  with  the  bishop  of  Amiens 
nights,"  three  nights  of  abstinence  who  claimed  the  right  to  grant 
which  newly  wedded  couples  were  dispensations  from  the  observance 
sometimes  accustomed  to  observ^e  of  the  Tobias  nights  and  re- 
in the  middle  ages  in  order  to  quired  that  fees  be  paid  him  for 
defeat  the  demons.  The  practice  that  purpose.  See  J.  G.  Frazer 
is  mentioned  in  the  Vulgate,  but  (1918),  I,  498-520,  where  analo- 
not  in  most  ancient  versions  of  gous  practices  of  primitive  tribes 
the  Book  of  Tobit.     In  1409  the  are  listed. 


690 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Relation 
of  Latin 
astrology 
to  Arabic. 


work  by  Julius  Firmicus  Maternus  should  be  found  under 
his  pillow  when  he  died."  ^  The  style  of  Firmicus  is  much 
imitated  by  the  anonymous  author  of  The  Laws  of  Henry  I 
and  another  legal  work  entitled  Quadripartitus  written  in 
1 1 14.  F.  Liebermann  states  that  the  author  was  in  the  serv- 
ice of  archbishop  Gerard  aforesaid.^ 

Charles  Jourdain  once  made  the  generalization  that  be- 
fore the  translation  of  the  Quadripartite  of  Ptolemy  and  the 
works  of  the  Arabian  astrologers  into  Latin  in  the  twelfth 
century,  astrology  had  little  hold  among  men  of  learning 
in  western  Europe.^  An  even  more  erroneous  assertion  was 
that  in  Burckhardt's  Die  Kultur  der  Renaissance  in  Itcdien 
that  "at  the  beginning  of  the  thirteenth  century"  the  super- 
stition of  astrology  "suddenly  appeared  in  the  foreground 
of  Italian  life."  ^  Even  Jourdain's  assertion  the  entire  pres- 
ent chapter  tends  to  disprove,  but  since  it  has  been  quoted 
with  approval  by  a  subsequent  writer  on  the  thirteenth  cen- 
tury,^ we  may  deal  with  it  a  little  farther.  The  reason  which 
Jourdain  added  in  support  of  his  generalization  was  that 
before  the  translations  from  the  Arabic  "those  who  culti- 
vated astrology  had  no  other  guides  than  Censorinus,  Manil- 
ius,  and  Julius  Firmicus,  who  might  indeed  seduce  a  few 


*  Bateson,  Medieval  England, 
1904,  p.  72;  I  have  in  the  main 
followed  the  fuller  account  in 
DNB  "Gerard,"  from  which  the 
previous  quotation  is  taken.  Wil- 
liam of  Malmesbury,  Gesta  Pon- 
tiiicum  Anglorum,  III,  118  (ed. 
N.  E.  S.  A.  Hamilton,  RS,  vol. 
52,  1870)  does  not  say  definitely 
that  the  book  found  under 
Gerard's  pillow  was  Firmicus. 
Also  he  says  nothing  of  boys 
stoning  the  bier  or  of  Gerard's 
enemies  interpreting  his  death  as 
a  divine  judgment,  and  in  his 
autograph  copy  of  the  Gesta  Pon- 
tificum  he  afterwards  erased  the 
statements  that  rumor  accused 
Gerard  of  many  crimes  and  lusts, 
and  that  he  was  said  to  practice 
sorcery  because  he  read  Julius 
Firmicus    on    the    sly    before    the 


mid-day  hours,  and  that  people 
say  that  a  book  of  curious  arts 
was  found  beneath  his  pillow 
when  he  died.  This,  the  late 
medieval  chroniclers  say,  was 
Firmicus :  see  Ranulf  Higden,  ed. 
Lumby,  VII,  420,  and  Knyghton, 
ed.  Twysden,  X,  SS.,  2375. 

'Firmicus  Maternus,  ed.  Kroll 
et  Skutsch,  II  (1913),  p.  iv;  and 
F.  Liebermann,  ed.  Quadripartitus, 
Halle,  1892,  p.  36,  and  Die 
Gesetze  der  Angelsachsen,  Halle, 
1903-1906,  I,  548. 

'  C.  Jourdain,  Nicolas  Oresme 
et  les  astrologues  a  la  cour  de 
Charles  V ,  in  Revue  des  Ques- 
tions Historiques,  1875,  p.  136. 

*  English  translation,  ed.  of 
1898,  p.  508. 

'N.  Valois  (1880),  p.  305. 


XXIX        LATIN  ASTROLOGY  AND  DIVINATION  691 

isolated  dreamers  but  did  not  have  enough  weight  to  con- 
vince philosophers.  Ptolemy  and  the  Arabs,  on  the  con- 
trary, appeared  as  masters  of  a  regular  science  having  its 
own  principles  and  method."  This  sounds  as  if  Jourdain 
had  not  read  Firmicus  who  gives  a  more  elaborate  presenta- 
tion of  the  art  of  astrology  than  the  elementary  Quadripar- 
tite of  Ptolemy.  It  is  true  that  Ptolemy  had  a  great  scien- 
tific reputation  from  his  other  writings,  but  Manilius  is  a 
poet  of  no  small  merit,  and  there  would  be  no  reason  why 
an  age  which  accepted  Ovid  and  Vergil  as  authorities  con- 
cerning nature  and  regarded  such  works  as  De  vetula  and 
the  Secret  of  Secrets  as  genuine  works  of  Ovid  and  Aris- 
totle, should  draw  delicate  distinctions  between  Firmicus 
and  Albumasar  or  Manilius  and  Alkindi.  It  was  because 
reading  Firmicus  and  even  practicing  the  cruder  modes  of 
divination  which  we  have  described  had  already  aroused  an 
interest  in  astrology  that  other  works  in  the  field  were  sought 
out  and  translated.  Moreover,  there  is  an  even  more  cogent 
objection  to  Jourdain's  generalization  which  will  be  de- 
veloped in  the  following  chapter,  and  it  is  that  the  taking  over 
of  Arabic  astrology  had  already  begun  long  before  the 
twelfth  century.  We  have,  indeed,  in  the  present  chapter 
told  only  half  the  story  of  astrology  in  the  tenth  and  eleventh 
centuries,  and  must  now  turn  back  to  Gerbert  and  the  intro- 
duction of  Arabic  astrology. 


APPENDIX  I 

SOME    MANUSCRIPTS    OF    THE    SPHERE    OF    PYTHAGORAS    OR 

APULEIUS 

Besides  the  copies  noted  by  Wickersheimer  (191 3)  in 
French  manuscripts  from  the  ninth  to  the  eleventh  centuries, 
such  as  Laon  407,  Orleans  276,  and  BN  nouv.  acq.  161 6, 
where  in  fact  it  occurs  twice :  at  f ol.  7v,  "Ratio  spere  phyta- 
gor  philosophi  quern  epulegiis  descripsit,"  and  at  fol.  14T, 
"Ratio  pitagere  de  infirmis," — the  following  may  be  listed. 

BN  5239,  loth  century,  jf  12. 

Harleian  3017,  loth  century,  fol.  s8r,  "Ratio  spherae  Pythagorae 
philosophi  quam  Apuleius  descripsit." 

Cotton  Tiberius  C,  VI,  nth  century,  fol.  6v,  Imagines  vitae  et 
mortis  quarum  utraque  rotulum  tenet  longum  literis  et  numeris 
quae  ad  sphaeram  Apuleii  ad  latera  adscriptis,  cum  versibus 
pagina  circumscriptis.  The  figures  are  of  Vita  with  halo,  robes, 
and  angelic  face,  and  of  Mors,  who  wears  only  a  pair  of  drawers, 
whose  ribs  show  through  his  flesh,  and  who  has  wings  like  a 
demon.  One  has  to  turn  the  page  upside  down  in  order  to  read 
some  of  it. 

CU  Trinity  1369,  nth  century,  fol.  ir,  just  before  the  Calendar 
of  Marianus  Scotus,  "Racio  spere  pytagorice  quam  apuleius 
descripsit." 

Chartres  113,  9th  century,  fol.  99,  following  works  by  Alcuin, 
"Spera  Apuleii  Platonis." 

Ivrea  19,  loth  century,  #  5,  De  spera  Putagorae. 

CLM  22307,  lo-iith  century,  fol.  194,  Ratio  sphaerae  Phitagoreae 
philosophi  quam  Apulegius  descripsit,  "Petosiris  philosophus 
Micipso  regi  salutem  .  .  .",  where  it  would  seem  to  be  confused 
with  the  letter  of  Petosiris  to  Nechepso. 

Vatican  Palat.  Lat.  176,  loth  century,  fol.  i62v,  "Eulogii  ratio 
sperae  Pitagorae  philosophi,"  in  a  MS  containing  works  of 
Jerome,  Augustine,  and  Ambrose. 

692 


CHAP.  XXIX     LATIN  ASTROLOGY  AND  DIVINATION    693 

Vatican  Urb.  Lat.  290,  ii-i3th  century,  fol,  2v,  Ratio  spere 
Pitagoras  quam  Apuleius  descripsit;  fol.  3,  Petosiris  Micipso 
regi  salutem. 

I  suspect  that  the  following  would  also  prove  upon  ex- 
amination to  be  one  of  these  Spheres  of  life  and  death. 

CLM  18629,  loth  century,  fol.  95,  Characteres  literarum  secre- 
tarum,  item  incantationes.  Alphabetum  Graecorum  et  numeri 
per  tabulam  dispositi;  fol.  106,  Tractatus  de  literis  alphabeti 
(mysticus). 

Vatican  Palat.  Lat.  485,  9th  century,  fol.  14,  Litterae  graecae  cum 
interpretatione  alphabetica  et  numerica. 

Vatican  644,  lo-iith  century,  fol.  i6v. 

Of  the  numerous  occurrences  of  the  Sphere  of  Pythag- 
oras or  of  Apuleius  in  MSS  later  than  the  eleventh  cen- 
tury I  have  noted  only  a  few  examples. 

Vienna  2532,  12th  century,  fols.  1-2,  Tractatus  astrologicus  de 
divinando  exitu  morborum  e  positionibus  lune  et  de  sphere 
Pythagore. 

Vatican  642,  12th  century,  fol.  82,  a  somewhat  different  mode  of 
divination,  by  which  one  tells  what  another  is  thinking  or  is 
holding  in  his  hand,  is  attributed  to  Bede. 

Madrid  10016,  early  13th  century,  fol.  3,  "spera  de  morte  vel  vita"; 
fol.  85V,  the  letter  of  Petosiris  to  Nechepso.  It  is  interesting  to 
note  that  this  MS  originally  belonged  to  an  English  Cluniac 
monastery:    Haskins,  EHR  (1915),  p.  65. 

BN  7486,  14th  century,  fol.  66v,  "Canon  supra  rotam  Pictagore," 
opens,  "Pictagoras  is  said  to  have  written  thus  to  Nasurius, 
king  of  the  Chaldees;"  then  at  fol.  6yv  comes  "The  Sphere  of 
Pictagoras  the  philosopher  which  Epuleus  Platonicus  briefly 
described;"  which  is  followed  at  fol.  68r  by  a  long  treatise 
ascribed  to  Ptolemy,  Exortatio  ad  artem  prescientie  ptholomei 
regis  egypti,  in  which  various  questions  are  answered  by  nu- 
merical and  alphabetical  calculations  and  one  is  also  by  the  same 
method  referred  to  nativities  arranged  under  the  28  mansions 
of  the  moon. 

CU  Trinity  1109,  14th  century,  fol.  15,  Spera  apulei  et  platonici; 
fol.  20,  "Ratio  spere  pictagis  philosophe  quod  apoUonius 
scripsit;"  fol.  392,  S(p)era  Fortune. 

Digby,  58,  14th  century,  fol.  iv.  "Spera  philosophorum." 


694      MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE    chap,  xxix 

Bodleian  26  (Bernard  1871),  I3-I4th  century,  fols.  207  and  2i6v. 

Bodleiati  177  (Bernard  2072),  late  14th  century,  #  i,  Pythagorae 
sphaera  quam  Apuleius  exaravit  ut  scias  an  aeger  convalescat ; 
#  14,  fol.  22r,  Apuleii  Platonic!  Sphaera  de  vita  et  morte  et  de 
omnibus  negotiis  quae  inquirere  volueris. 

Amplon.  Quarto  380,  14th  century,  at  the  close  of  a  Geomancy  by 
Abdallah,  "Spera  Apuley  de  vita  et  morte  vel  de  omnibus 
negociis  de  quibus  scire  volueris;  sic  facias.  .  .  ." 

Additional  15236,  I3-I4th  century,  fol.  108,  "Spera  (Pictagore)  de 
vita  et  morte  sive  de  re  alia  quacunque  secundum  Apuleium." 

Harleian  531 1,  15th  century,  folder  i,  "Spera  ApuUei." 

S.  Marco  XI,  iii,  i6th  century,  ascribes  a  wheel  of  life  and  death 
to  "Bede  the  presbyter,"  and  another  to  ApoUonius  and  Pythag- 
oras. 


APPENDIX  II 

EGYPTIAN  DAYS  IN  EARLY  MEDIEVAL  MANUSCRIPTS 

The  following  citations  could  probably  be  greatly  mul- 
tiplied. 

BN  nouv.  acq.  1616,  9th  century,  fol.  I2r. 

Digby  63,  end  of  9th  century,  Anglo-Saxon  minuscule,   fol.  36, 

"Dies  Egipciachi." 
Berlin  131  (Phillips  1869,  Trier),  9th  century,  fol.  I2r. 
Lucca  236,  about  900  A.  D.,  on  its  last  3  leaves  are  Egyptian  days 

and  a  dream-book;  described  by  Giacosa  (1901),  p.  349. 
Harleian  3017,  loth  century,  fol.  59r,  De  diebus  Egiptiacis  qui  mali 

sunt  in  anno  circulo.    The  catalogue  dates  this  MS  as  920  A.  D. 

but  at  fol.  66r  the  date  is  given  as  DCCClxii  or  DCCCClxii 

(962  A.  D.) — a  letter  seems  to  have  been  erased  which  probably 

was  the  fourth  C. 
Harleian  3271,  loth  century  (?),  fol.  121,  Versus  ad  dies  Egyp- 

tiacas  inveniendas.    See  also  Baehrens,  Poet.  lat.  min.  V,  354-6; 

Mommsen  CIL  I,  411. 
Sloane  475,  this  portion  of  the  MS   lo-iith  century,   fol.  2i6v, 

Versus    de    significatione    dierum    mensis,    opening,    'Tenebrae 

Aegyptus  Grecos  sermone  vocantur.  ..." 
Additional  22398,  loth  century,  fol.  104. 
Cotton  Caligula  A,  XV,  written  mostly  in  Gaul  before  1000  A.  D., 

fol.  126,  a  list  of  lucky  and  unlucky  days  for  medical  purposes, 

in  Anglo-Saxon. 
Cotton  Titus  D,  XXVI,  loth  century,  fol.  3V. 
Cotton  Vitellius  A,  XII,  fol.  39V. 
Cotton  Vitellius  C,  VIII,  in  Anglo-Saxon,  fol.  22,,  de  tribus  anni 

diebus  Aegyptiacis. 
CU  Trinity  945,  early  nth  century,  fol.  2)7- 
CU  Trinity  1369,  nth  century  (perhaps  1086  A.  D.)  fol.  iv. 
Vatican  644,  lo-iith  century,  fol.  77r,  versus  duodecim  de  diebus 

aegyptiis,  and  a  fragment  "de  tribus  diebus  aegyptiis." 
Dijon  448,  io-i2th  century,  fol.  88,  Calendrier,  avec  jours  egyp- 

tiaques  ajoutes;  fol.   191,  "De  Egyptiacis  diebus."     Bede's  De 

695 


696    MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE    chap,  xxix 

temporihus  and  De  natura  rerum  occur  twice  in  this  MS  and 

at  fol.  181  is  an  incantation  for  use  in  fevers. 
Harleian   1585   and   Sloane    1975,   where  the   Egyptian   days    are 

found  with  the  Herbarium  of  Apuleius,  are  both  12th  century 

but  probably  copied  from  earher  MSS. 
So  in  Chalons-sur-Marne  7,  13th  century,  fol.  41,  verses  on  the 

Egyptian  days  occur  with  the  Ars  calculatoria  of  Helpericus  of 

Auxerre  who  wrote  in  the  ninth  century. 

I  have  usually  not  noted  the  occurrence  of  the  Egyptian 
days  in  later  manuscripts.     A  few  exceptions  are : 

BN  7299A,  i2th  century,  fol.  37r. 

CLM  23390,  i2-i3th  century,  the  last  item  is,  "Verses  concerning 
the  twelve  signs  and  the  Egyptian  days."  The  previous  con- 
tents were  mainly  religious. 

Cambrai  195,  fol.  208;  229,  fol.  56;  829,  fol.  54;  all  three  MSS  of 
the  1 2th  century. 

Cambrai  861,  early  13th  century,  fol.  56. 

Sloane  2461,  end  of  13th  century,  fols.  62r-64v. 

The  verses  concerning  the  ten  plagues  of  Egypt  contained  in 
CLM  18629,  loth  century,  fol.  93,  and  ascribed  by  the  catalogue 
to  Eugenius  Toletanus  have,  I  presume,  no  connection  with  the 
Egyptian  days.  Such  proved  to  be  the  case  with  BN  16216,  13th 
century,  fol.  25 iv,  de  decem  plagis  Egyptiorum  et  de  vii  diebus, 
although  from  the  fact  that  it  follows  "Precepta  Pithagore"  I 
suspected  before  examining  it  that  it  might  have  something  to  do 
with  divination.  But  not  even  the  Pythagorean  precepts  have  in 
this  case. 


CHAPTER  XXX 

GERBERT    AND    THE    INTRODUCTION    OF    ARABIC    ASTROLOGY 

Arabic  influence  in  early  manuscripts — A  preface  and  twenty-one 
chapters  on  the  astrolabe — Are  they  parts  of  one  work? — Their  rela- 
tion to  Gerbert  and  the  Arabic — Hermann's  De  mensiira  astrolabii — 
Attitude  towards  astrology  in  the  preface — Question  of  Gerbert's  atti- 
tude towards  astrology — His  posthumous  reputation  as  a  magician — 
An  anonymous  astronomical  treatise;  its  possible  relation  to  Gerbert 
—Contents  of  its  first  two  books — Attitude  towards  astrology — The 
fourth  book — Citations  :  Arabic  names — Mathematica  of  Alchandrus 
or  Alhandreus — An  account  of  its  contents — Astrological  doctrine — 
Nativities  and  name-calculations — Interrogations  and  more  name-calcu- 
lations— Alchandrus  or  Alhandreus  not  the  same  as  Alexander — 
Alkandrinus  or  Alchandrinus  on  nativities  according  to  the  mansions 
of  the  moon — Albandinus — Geomancy  of  Alkardianus  or  Alchandianus 
— An  anonymous  treatise  or  fragment  of  the  tenth  century. 

The   usual   view   has   been    that   western    Latin    learning  Arabic 
was   not  affected  by  Arabic   science  until   the  twelfth   or   |||  g^j-ly 
even  the  thirteenth  century.    We  shall  see  in  other  chapters   manu- 

.  .  ,    scripts. 

that  the  translations  of  the  Aristotelian  books  of  natural 
philosophy  were  current  rather  earlier  than  has  been  recog- 
nized, that  in  medicine  a  period  of  Neo-Latin  Salernitan 
tradition  can  scarcely  be  distinguished  from  one  of  Arabic 
influence,  and  that  in  chemistry  owing  to  the  misinterpre- 
tation of  the  date  of  Robert  of  Chester's  translation  of  the 
book  of  Morienus  Romanus — in  which  Robert  says  that 
the  Latin  world  does  not  yet  know  what  alchemy  is — Ber- 
thelot  in  his  history  of  medieval  alchemy  placed  the  intro- 
duction of  Arabic  influence  half  a  century  too  late.  In  the 
present  chapter  we  shall  see  that  the  voluminous  work  of 
translation  of  Arabic  astrologers  which  went  on  in  the 
twelfth  century — and  to  which  another  chapter  will  later  be 
devoted — was  preceded  in  the  eleventh  and  even  tenth  cen- 
turies by  numerous  signs  of  Arabic  influence  in  works  of 

697 


698 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


A  preface 
and 

twenty- 
one  chap- 
ters on 
the  as- 
trolabe. 


astronomy  and  astrology  and  also  by  translations  of  Arabic 
authors.  I  was  somewhat  startled  when  I  first  found  works 
by  Arabic  authors  and  use  of  astronomical  terminology 
drawn  from  the  Arabic  in  a  manuscript  of  the  eleventh  cen- 
tury in  the  British  Museum  ^  and  Wickersheimer  was  simi- 
larly surprised  at  the  traces  of  Arabic  influence  in  a  similar 
but  still  earlier  manuscript  of  the  tenth  century  at  Paris. ^ 
Bubnov,  however,  had  already  noted  this  Paris  manuscript 
as  a  proof  that  Arabic  books  were  being  translated  into  Latin 
in  Gerbert's  time,^  and  one  of  Gerbert's  letters,  written  in 
984  to  a  Lupitus  of  Barcelona  (Lupito  Barch'inonensi),  ask- 
ing him  to  send  Gerbert  a  book  on  "astrology"  which  he 
had  translated,  points  in  the  same  direction.  In  the  pres- 
ent chapter  we  shall  discuss  the  contents  of  the  early  manu- 
scripts just  mentioned  and  of  some  others  which  seem  to 
have  some  connection  either  with  Gerbert  or  the  introduc- 
tion of  Arabic  astrology  into  Latin  learning. 

In  an  eleventh  century  manuscript  at  Munich  *  the  as- 
trological work  of  Firmicus  is  preceded  by  writings  in  a 
different  hand  upon  the  astrolabe.  One  of  these,  in  its  pres- 
ent state  an  anonymous  fragment,  is  a  stilted  and  florid  in- 
troduction to  a  translation  from  the  Arabic  of  a  work  on 
the  astrolabe.^  Another  is  a  treatise  on  the  astrolabe  in 
twenty-one  chapters  and  containing  many  Arabic  names. ^ 


*  Additional  17,808,  a  narrow 
folio  in  vellum  with  all  the  trea- 
tises written  in  the  same  large, 
plain  hand  with  few  abbrevia- 
tions. A  considerable  part  of  the 
MS  is  occupied  by  the  work  on 
music  of  Guido  of  Arezzo  (c. 
995-1050).  This  MS  is  not  noted 
by  Wickersheimer  or  by  Bubnov, 
although  it  includes  treatises  on 
the  abacus  and  the  astrolabe 
which  are  perhaps  by  Gerbert. 

'BN  17,868,  from  the  chapter 
of  Notre  Dame  of  Paris,  21 
leaves.  Wickersheimer  (1913). 
321-3,  states  that  it  has  all  the 
marks  of  the  writing  of  the  tenth 
century :  Delisle  so  dated  it. 
Bubnov  (1899),  LXVII,  regards 
fols.  I4r  et  seq.  as  by  a  slightly 


older  hand  than  the  first  portion. 

'Bubnov  (1899),  124-6,  note. 

^CLM  560,  described  in  Bub- 
nov, Gerberti  opera  mathematica, 
1899,  p.  xli. 

^  Ibid.,  fols.  i6r-i9,  Fragmen- 
tum  libelli  de  astrolabio  a  quodam 
ex  Arabico  versi.  Incipit,  "Ad  in- 
timas  summe  phylosophie  disci- 
plinas  et  sublimia  ipsius  perfec- 
tionis  archisteria."  Printed  by 
Bubnov   (1899),  pp.  370-75- 

'  Incipit  "Quicumque  astronomi- 
am  peritiam  disciplinae" ;  the 
printed  editions  insert  a  discere 
after  astronomiam,  but  it  has  not 
been  there  in  the  MSS  which  I 
have  seen  and  is  not  needed. 
Printed  by  Pez,  Thesaurus  Anec- 
dotorum  NotAss.     Ill,   ii,    109-30, 


XXX  GERBERT  AND  ARABIC  ASTROLOGY  699 

Bubnov  lists  three  other  copies  of  the  introductory  fragment, 
and  they  are  all  in  manuscripts  where  the  second  treatise  is 
also  included;^  it,  however,  is  often  found  in  other  manu- 
scripts where  the  anonymous  fragment  does  not  appear,  and 
it  must  be  admitted  that  its  omission  is  no  great  loss. 

Although  the  fragment  precedes  the  other  treatise  in  Are  they 
only  one  manuscript  mentioned  by  Bubnov,  there  is  reason  on?work? 
to  think  that  they  belong  together,  since  both  are  concerned 
with  the  Wazzalcora  or  planisphere  or  astrolapsus  of 
Ptolemy,  and  since  the  plan  outlined  by  the  writer  of  the 
introduction  is  followed  in  the  treatise  of  twenty-one  chap- 
ters except  that  it  ends  incompletely.  Bubnov  recognized 
this,  yet  did  not  unite  them  as  a  single  work.^  In  984  Ger- 
bert  wrote  to  a  Lupito  Barchinonensi  asking  Lupitus  to 
send  him  a  work  on  "astrology"  which  Lupitus  had  trans- 
lated.^ If  Lupitus  was  of  Barcelona,  his  translation  was 
probably  from  the  Arabic,  and  as  such  translations  were 
presumably  not  common  in  the  tenth  century,  it  is  natural 
to  wonder  if  he  may  not  be  the  above-mentioned  anonymous 
translator.  This  Bubnov  suggested  in  the  case  of  the  intro- 
ductory fragment,*  but  the  treatise  in  twenty-one  chapters 
he  placed  among  the  doubtful  works  of  Gerbert,^  because  a 
monastic  catalogue  composed  before  1084  speaks  of  a  work 
of  Gerbert  on  the  astrolabe,  while  six  manuscripts  of  the 

(1721)     and    incorrectly    ascribed  as  in  other  MSS  of  "Regulae  ex 

by  him  to  Hermannus  Contractus,  libris     Ptolomei     regis     de     com- 

because    it    often    occurs    in    the  positione  astrolapsus."     Yet  Bub- 

MSS  together  with  another  trea-  nov  says,  p.  cxvi,  "Catalogues  of 

tise  on  the  astrolabe  by  a  "Heri-  Additional    MSS    (omnia  volumi- 

mannus    Christi    pauperum    perip-  na  inspexi,  quae  ante  a.  1895  edita 

sima     et     philosophiae     tyronum  sunt)."     BM    Egerton    823,    12th 

asello  imo  limace  tardior  assecla."  century,    fol.   4r.     BN   7412,    12th 

Of  this  last  we  shall  have  more  and     13th     centuries,     fols.     1-9, 

to  say  presently.     The  edition  of  "Waztalkora    sive   tract,    de   utili- 

Pez  reappears  in  Migne,  PL  vol.  tatibus  astrolabii."     Professor   D. 

143.    Bubnov  (1899),  114-47,  gives  B.       Macdonald      suggests      that 

a  new  edition,  and  at  pp.  109-13  a  Waztalkora    is    for    rasmu-l-kura, 

listof  the  MSS  of  the  work,  in  "the   describing  of   the   sphere   in 

which,  however,   he   fails  to  note  lines." 

the  following:  and  they  are  also  *  (1899),  p.  370. 

absent  from  his  general  index  of  '(1899),  p.  374. 

153    codices   at   pp.    xvii-xc.     BM  *  Ep.  24. 

Additional    MS    17808,    nth    cen-  *  (1899),  p.  370. 

tury,  fols.  73v-79r,  under  the  title  *  P.  109. 


700 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Their  re- 
lation to 
Gerbert 
and  the 
Arabic. 


twelfth  and  thirteenth  centuries,  although  none  earlier  to 
his  knowledge,  ascribe  this  very  treatise  of  twenty-one  chap- 
ters to  Gerbert.  Bubnov  believed  that  whoever  the  author 
of  the  treatise  in  twenty-one  chapters  was,  he  had  utilized 
the  full  work  of  the  anonymous  translator.  But  this  seems 
a  rather  unnecessary  refinement.  For  what  has  become  of 
that  translation?  Why  is  only  its  wordy  and  rhetorical 
preface  extant?  If  the  writer  of  the  twenty-one  chapters 
destroyed  its  text  after  plagiarizing  it,  why  did  he  not  also 
make  away  with  the  preface?  It  seems  more  plausible  that 
the  twenty-one  chapters  are  the  original  translation  from 
the  Arabic,  and  that  many  makers  of  manuscripts  have 
copied  it  alone  and  omitted  the  wordy  and  rather  worthless 
preface  of  the  translator.  If,  as  Bubnov  suggested,  the 
treatise  in  twenty-one  chapters  is  Gerbert's  revision  and 
polishing  up  of  Lupitus'  translation,^  why  did  he  not  pre- 
fix a  new  introduction  of  his  own?  And  why  should  anyone 
try  to  polish  up  the  style  of  so  rhetorical  a  writer  as  he  who 
penned  the  extant  anonymous  introduction? 

If  we  accept  this  anonymous  introduction  as  the  preface 
to  the  twenty-one  chapters,  Gerbert  would  be  the  most  likely 
person  to  ascribe  both  to,  unless  we  argue  that  he  could 
not  make  a  translation  from  the  Arabic  and  that  his  letter 
asking  to  see  a  translation  from  the  Arabic  by  Lupitus  is 
a  proof  of  this.  If  Gerbert  is  not  the  author,  Lupitus 
would  perhaps  be  the  next  most  likely  person,  but  the  hint 
contained  in  Gerbert's  letter  is  all  that  points  to  Lupitus, 
and  indeed  the  only  mention  that  we  have  of  him.  If  the 
translator  is  some  third  unknown  person,  at  least  he  is  not 
later  than  the  eleventh  century.  If,  on  the  other  hand,  we 
regard  the  introduction  of  the  translator  and  the  twenty- 
one  chapters  as  by  different  persons,  who  perhaps  had  no 
connection  with  each  other,  and  Gerbert's  letter  of  984  as 
having  nothing  to  do  with  either,  we  have  the  moi  2  evidence 
of   an   early   and   widespread   interest   in   astronomy   and 

*  Bubnov   (1899),  370  .  .  .  "Hoc      manum   habuit,   retractavit  dicen- 
opusculum  ex  Arahico  versum  ad      dique  genere  expolivit." 


XXX  GERBERT  AND  ARABIC  ASTROLOGY  701 

knowledge  of  Arabic  in  the  western  Latin  learned  world. 

One  reason  why  the  treatise  on  the  astrolabe  in  twenty-   Her- 
one  chapters  is  so  seldom  found  in  the  manuscripts  preceded   "i^nnsDe 

,^  .  r       r  mensura 

by  the  introduction  of  the  translator  may  be  that  it  is  more  astrolabU. 
often  found  with  and  preceded  by  another  treatise  on  the 
astrolabe,  sometimes  entitled  De  mensura  astrolabii,  and 
attributed  to  a  Hermann  who  modestly  calls  himself  "the 
offscouring  of  Christ's  poor  and  the  butt  of  mere  tyros  in 
philosophy."  ^  This  treatise  tells  how  to  construct  an  astro- 
labe, thus  filling  in  the  deficiency  left  by  the  incomplete  end- 
ing of  the  treatise  in  twenty-one  chapters,  which  fails  to 
carry  out  fully  this  last  item  in  the  plan  of  the  introductory 
fragment.  A  note  in  one  manuscript,  reproduced  in  part 
by  Macray  in  his  catalogue  of  the  Digby  Manuscripts  in  the 
Bodleian  Library,  states  that  the  treatise  in  twenty-one 
chapters  is  by  Gerbert  and  that  when  a  certain  Berengarius 
read  it,  he  found  it  told  how  to  exercise  the  art  but  not 
to  make  the  instrument  and  asked  Hermann  to  tell  him  how 
to  make  one.  Hermann  therefore  composed  the  work  in 
question,  dedicated  it  to  Berengarius,  and  prefixed  it  to  Ger- 
bert's  treatise.^  Of  late  there  has  been  a  tendency  to  identify 
this  Hermann  with  Hermann  of  Dalmatia,  the  twelfth  cen- 
tury translator  from  the  Arabic,^  rather  than  with  Her- 
mann the  Lame,  the  chronicler,  who  died  in  1054,  but  if 
Bubnov  is  correct  in  dating  two  manuscripts  ^  containing 

^  Printed      by      Pez.      Thesaur.  Hermann  le  Dalmate  et  les  pre- 

Anecdot.    Noviss.    Ill,    ii,    95-106.  micres     traductions     latines     des 

"Herimannus     Christi     pauperum  traites     arabes     d'astronomic     au 

peripsima  et  philosophiae  tyronum  moyen    age,    Paris,    Picard,    1891, 

asello  imo  limace  tardior  assecla."  11   pp.     Clerval  adduced  only  one 

The  MSS  are  numerous.  MS   in   support  of  his  contention 

^  Digby     174,     fol.     210V ;     also  and  took  up  the  untenable  position 

noted  by   Bubnov    (1899),  p.   113.  that    Arabic    astronomy    was    un- 

Hermann's     dedicatory     prologue,  known  in  Latin  until  the  twelfth 

however,      does      not      give      his  century.      He    also    did    not    dis- 

friend's   name   in    full,   but    reads  tinguish     between     the     different 

in  this  MS,  "B.  amico  suo."  works  on  the  astrolabe. 

^  See      Clerval,      Hermann      le  *  Munich  CLM  14836,  f  ols.  i6v- 

Dalmate,    Paris,    1891,   in    Compte  24r.      BM     Royal     15-B-IX,     fol. 

rendu     du     Congres     scientiiique  Sir-:    in   both    cases    followed   by 

international       des       catholiques,  the   treatise   of   twenty-one   chap- 

Sciences  Historiques,  163-9.    Also,  ters. 
I  believe,  published   separately  as 


702 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Attitude 
towards 
astrology 
in  the 
preface. 


Hermann's  treatise  on  the  astrolabe  in  the  eleventh  century, 
they  could  not  be  the  work  of  Hermann  the  translator  of  the 
next  century.^  Moreover,  in  the  thirteenth  century  the  trea- 
tise seems  to  have  been  regarded  as  the  work  of  Hermann 
the  Lame.^  The  author's  self-depreciatory  description  of 
himself  is  also  a  mark  of  Hermann  the  Lame,  who  in  another 
treatise  addressed  to  his  friend  Herrandus  and  discussing  the 
length  of  a  moon  calls  himself  "of  Christ's  poor  a  vile 
abortion."  ^ 

In  the  treatise  of  twenty-one  chapters,  which  simply 
tells  how  to  use  the  astrolabe,  there  is  naturally  no  refer- 
ence to  judicial  astrology.  But  in  the  introduction  of  the 
anonymous  writer  to  his  translation  from  the  Arabic  of 
a  work  on  the  astrolabe  there  is  mention  of  the  influence 
of  the  stars.  Their  "concord  with  all  mundane  creatures  in 
all  things"  is  regarded  as  established  by  "secret  institution 


*  Professor  Haskins  has  an- 
nounced as  in  preparation  an 
article  on  Hermann  the  translator 
which  will  perhaps  solve  the 
difficulties. 

^  In  a  Berlin  manuscript  of  the 
twelfth  century  (Berlin  956,_  fol. 
ii)  there  is  added  a  note  in  a 
thirteenth  century  hand  recount- 
ing the  legend  that  this  Hermann 
was  the  son  of  a  king  and  queen 
and  that,  his  mother  having  been 
asked  before  his  birth  whether 
she  would  prefer  a  handsome  and 
foolish  son  or  a  learned  and 
shamefully  ugly  one  and  she  hav- 
ing chosen  the  latter  alternative, 
he  was  born  hunchbacked  and 
lame.  It  was  from  this  MS  of 
the  treatise  on  the  astrolabe  that 
Pertz  edited  the  legend  in  the 
Monumenta  Germaniae  {Scrip- 
tores,  V,  267).  Rose  (1905),  P- 
1 179,  calls  the  writer  of  this  note 
Berengar,  too,  asking  anent  the 
opening  words  of  the  note,  "De 
isto  hermanno  legitur  in  historia," 
"Aus  welcher  historia  hat  der 
Schreiber  (Berengarius)  seine 
Fabeln?"  The  note  at  the  close 
of  the  treatise  in  Digby  174,  fol. 
21OV,  gives  a  different  version  of 
the  legend,  stating  that  Hermann 


was  a  good  man  and  dear  to  God 
and  that  one  day  an  angel  offered 
him  his  choice  between  bodily 
health  without  great  wisdom  and 
the  greatest  science  with  corporal 
infirmity.  Hermann  chose  the 
latter  and  afterwards  became  a 
paralytic  and  gouty. 

'  This  treatise,  in  which  Her- 
mann expresses  amazement  that 
Bede  has  so  underestimated  the 
duration  of  the  moon,  immediately 
precedes  the  one  on  the  astrolabe 
in  BN  nouv.  acq.  229,  a  German 
MS  of  the  twelfth  century,  fols. 
I7r-i9r  (formerly  pp.  265-269). 
After  the  treatise  on  the  astrolabe 
follows  a  third  work  by  Hermann, 
"de  quodam  horologio,"  fols.  25V- 
28r.  Then  follows  the  treatise  in 
twenty-one  chapters  on  the  astro- 
labe. 

These  citations  alone  are  suf- 
ficient to  demonstrate  the  error  of 
Clerval's  assertion:  (1891),  165. 
"On  ne  pent  invoquer  aucune 
preuve  serieuse  en  faveur  d'Her- 
mann  Contract.  Jacques  de  Ber- 
game  et  Tritheme  .  .  .  sont  les 
premiers  qui  aient  attribue  au 
moirue  de  Constance  les  traites  en 
question." 


XXX  GERBERT  AND  ARABIC  ASTROLOGY  703 

of  divinity  and  by  natural  law"  and  testified  to  by  scientists.^ 
Not  only  is  the  effect  of  the  moon  on  tides  adduced  as  usual 
as  an  example,  but  God  is  believed  to  have  set  the  seal  of 
His  approval  upon  "this  discipline,"  when  He  made  miracu- 
lous use  of  the  stars  and  heavens  to  mark  the  birth  and 
passion  of  His  Son.    The  writer,  however,  stigmatizes  as  a 
"frivolous  superstition"  the  doctrine  of  the  Chaldean  ge- 
nethlialogi,  "who  account  for  the  entire  life  of  man  by  as- 
trological reasons"  and  "try  to  explain  conceptions  and  na- 
tivities, character,  prosperity  and  adversity  from  the  courses 
of  the  stars."     Something  nevertheless  is  to  be  conceded  to 
them,  provided  all  things  are  recognized  as  under  divine 
disposition.    But  their  doctrine  is  an  Q.gg  which  is  not  to  be 
sucked  unless  rid  of  the  bad  odors  of  error. ^     The  trans- 
lator urges  the  importance  of  a  knowledge  of  astronomy  in 
determining  the  date  of  church  festivals  and  canonical  hours. 
He  cites  Josephus  concerning  Abraham's  instruction  of  the 
Egyptians  in  arithmetic  and  astronomy,  but  regards  Ptolemy 
as  the  most  illustrious  of  all  astronomers  and  the  astrolabe 
as   the   invention   of   his   "divine  mind."     The   translator 
wishes  his  readers  to  understand  that  he  is  offering  them 
nothing  new  but  only  reviving  the  discoveries  of  the  past, 
and  that  he  is  simply  presenting  what  he  finds  in  the  Arabic. 

^Bubnov  (1899)  372.  "Habet  etiam  conceptiones  et  nativitates, 
etiam  ex  divinitatis  archana  insti-  hominumque  mores,  prospera  seu 
tutione  et  physica  lata  ratione  cum  adversa  ex  cursu  siderum  ex- 
omnibus  mundanis  creaturis  con-  plicare  conantur.  Quod  illorum 
cordiam  in  rebus  omnibus,  secun-  tamen  frivolae  superstitiositati 
dum  phisiologos  non  parvam  con-  concedendum  est,  dum  omnia 
gruentiam.  .  .  ."  Bubnov  unfortu-  divinae  dispositioni  commen- 
nately  used  only  one  of  his  four  danda  sint.  Illud  est  ovum  a 
]\ISS  in  printing  this  text,  and  nullo  forbillandum  (Bubnov  sug- 
there  often  seems  to  be  something  gests  the  reading  furcillandum  in 
wrong  with  it  or  with  his  punc-  parentheses,  but  sorbillandum 
tuation.  This  criticism  applies  seems  to  me  the  obvious  reading), 
more  especially  to  the  passage  nisi  prius  foetidos  inscitiae  ex- 
quoted  in  the  following  footnote.  halaverit    ructus    et    feces    mun- 

^  Ibid.,    "Et    ut    Chaldaicas    re-  dialium       evomerit       studiorum." 

ticeam   gentilogias    {sic)    qui   om-  The  passage  is   rather  incoherent 

nein   humanam   vitam  astrologicis  as    it   stands,    but    I    hope   that    I 

attribuunt        rationationibus        et  have      correctly      interpreted     its 

quosdam   constellationum   efYectus  meaning. 
Der    xii    signa    disponunt,    quique 


704 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Question 

of  Ger- 

bert's 

attitude 

toward 

astrology. 


His  pos- 
thumous 
reputation 
as  a 
magician. 


If  Gerbert  could  be  shown  to  be  the  translator  who  wrote 
this  introduction,  it  would  be  a  more  valuable  bit  of  evi- 
dence as  to  his  attitude  toward  astrology  than  anything  that 
we  have  at  present.  His  surely  genuine  mathematical  works, 
as  edited  by  Bubnov,  consist  solely  of  a  short  geometry  and 
a  few  of  his  letters  in  which  mathematical  topics,  mainly 
the  abacus,  are  touched  upon.  His  contemporary  and  dis- 
ciple, the  historian  Richer,  tells  in  the  well-known  passage  ^ 
how  Borellus,  "the  duke  of  Hither  Spain,"  took  Gerbert 
as  a  youth  from  the  monastery  at  Aurillac  in  Auvergne  back 
with  him  across  the  Pyrenees  and  entrusted  his  education 
to  Hatto,  bishop  of  Vich,  in  the  north-eastern  part  of  the 
peninsula.  Whether  Gerbert  studied  Arabic  or  not  Richer 
does  not  state.  Since  he  is  still  described  as  adolescens 
when  the  duke  and  bishop  take  him  with  them  to  Italy  and 
leave  him  there  with  the  pope,  one  would  infer  that  he  prob- 
ably had  not  engaged  in  the  work  of  translation  from  the 
Arabic.  Another  almost  contemporary  writer,  alluding  very 
briefly  to  Gerbert,  makes  him  visit  Cordova,  but  is  perhaps 
mistaken.^  Richer  does,  however,  state  that  Berbert  es- 
pecially studied  mathesis,  a  word  which,  as  various  medieval 
writers  inform  us,  may  mean  either  mathematics  or  divina- 
tion. Apparently  Richer  uses  it  in  the  former  sense,  for 
later  he  mentions  only  Gerbert's  achievements  in  arithmetic, 
geometry,  music,  and  astronomy.^  But  Robert,  king  of 
France,  987-1031,  whose  teacher  Gerbert  had  been,  seems 
to  refer  to  him  as  "that  master  Neptanebus"  in  some  verses,* 
a  name  which  certainly  suggests  an  astrologer,  as  well  as  an 
instructor  of  royalty,  if  not  also  a  magician. 

But  Gerbert's  reputation  for  magic  seems  to  start  with 
William  of  Malmesbury  in  the  first  half  of  the  twelfth  cen- 
tury, who  makes  him  flee  by  night  from  his  monastery  to 
Spain  to  study  "astrology"  and  other  arts  with  the  Saracens, 

*  III,  43-45.  Bulletin   Hispanique,   Annates   de 

'  Ademarus     Cabannensis,     who  la   Faculte    des   Lettres   de    Bor- 

died    about    1035    (Bubnov,    1899,  deaux,  XXII,  4,  p.  329. 

382-3).     For  Gerbert's  sources  in  'III,  48-53. 

Barcelona  see  J.  M.  Burnam,  "A  *  "Plurima   me  docuit   Neptane- 

Group  of  Spanish  Manuscripts,"  in  bus  ille  magister"   (Bubnov,  381). 


XXX  GERBERT  AND  ARABIC  ASTROLOGY  705 

until  he  came  to  surpass  Julius  Firmicus  in  his  knowledge 
of  fate.  There  too,  according  to  William  of  Malmesbury, 
"he  learned  what  the  song  and  flight  of  birds  portend,  to 
summon  ghostly  figures  from  the  lower  world,  and  what- 
ever human  curiosity  has  encompassed  whether  harmful  or 
salutary."  William  then  adds  some  more  sober  facts  con- 
cerning Gerbert's  mathematical  achievements  and  associates.^ 
Michael  Scot  in  his  Introduction  to  Astrology  in  the  early 
thirteenth  century  speaks  of  a  master  Gilhertiis  who  was 
the  best  nigromancer  in  France  and  whom  the  demons 
obeyed  in  all  that  he  required  of  them  day  and  night  be- 
cause of  the  great  sacrifices  which  he  offered  and  his 
prayers  and  fastings  and  magic  books  and  great  diversity 
of  rings  and  candles.  Having  succeeded  in  borrowing  an 
astrolabe  for  a  short  time  he  made  the  demons  explain  its 
purpose,  how  to  operate  it,  and  how  to  make  another  one. 
Later  he  reformed  and  became  bishop  of  Ravenna  and 
pope.^  In  a  manuscript  early  in  the  thirteenth  century  is  a 
statement  that  Gerbert  became  archbishop  and  pope  by  de- 
mon aid  and  had  a  spirit  enclosed  in  a  golden  head  whom  he 
consulted  as  to  knotty  problems  in  composing  his  commen- 
tary on  arithmetic.  When  the  demon  expounded  a  certain 
very  difficult  place  badly,  Gerbert  skipped  it,  and  hence  that 
unexplained  passage  is  called  the  Saltus  Gilberti.^ 

In  a  manuscript  in  the  Bodleian  library  which  seems  to   Ananony- 
have  been  written  early  in  the  twelfth  century^  is  an  as-   ^onomkal 
tronomical  treatise  in  four  books  which  Macray  suggested   treatise; 
might  be  the  Liber  de  planeti^  et  mundi  climatihus  which   relation  to 
Ethelwold,  bishop  of  Winchester  from  963  to  984,  is  said 
to  have  composed.^     The  present  treatise  indeed  embodies 

^De  rebus  gestis  re  gum  Anglo-  many    figures    in    red,    76   leaves. 

rum,  II,  167-8.  For  the  Incipits  of  the  four  books 

^  Bodleian  266,  fol.  25r.  and  their  prologues  see  Macray's 

^  Bubnov   (1899),  391.     On  Ger-  Catalogue  of  the  Digby  MSS. 

bert  as  a  magician  see  further  J.  "Another    indication    of    mathe- 

J.  I.  Bollinger,  Die  Papst-Fabeln  matical   activity    in    tenth   century 

des  Mittclalters,  Munich,  1863,  pp.  England  is  provided  by  some  old 

155-59-  verses  in  English  in  Royal   17-A- 

*  Digby  83,  quarto  in  skin,  well  I,    f  ols.    zw-t,,    which    state    that 

written  in  large  letters  with  few  Euclid's  geometry  was  introduced 

abbreviations  and  illustrated  with  into   England   "Yn   tyme  of   good 


Gerbert. 


7o6 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


a  Letter  of  Ethelwold  to  Pope  Gerbert  on  squaring  the 
circle.^  It  seems,  however,  that  this  letter  on  squaring  the 
circle  was  really  written  by  Adelbold,  bishop  of  Utrecht 
from  loio  to  1027.^  Adelbold  speaks  of  himself  in  the  let- 
ter as  a  young  man  ^  and  of  course  wrote  it  before  Ger- 
bert's  death  in  1003,  and  very  probably  before  Gerbert  be- 
came Pope  Silvester  II  in  999.  But  he  could  scarcely  have 
written  the  letter  early  enough  to  have  it  included  in  a 
work  written  by  Ethelwold  who  died  in  984.  Our  astro- 
nomical treatise  in  four  books  is  therefore  not  by  Ethel- 


kyng  Adelstones  day."  Usually 
the  first  Latin  translation  of 
Euclid  is  supposed  to  have  been 
that  by  Adelard  of  Bath  in  the 
early  twelfth  century.  Halliwell 
(1839),  56. 

*Digby  83,  fol.  24,  "Epistola 
Ethelwodi  ad  Girbertum  papam. 
Domino  summo  pontifici  et  phi- 
losopho  Girberto  pape  athelwoldus 
vite  felicitatem.  .  .  ."  Gerbert  of 
course  did  not  become  pope  until 
long  after  Ethelwold's  death,  but 
this  Titulus  and  Incipit  are  open 
to  suspicion  anyway,  since  if  Ger- 
bert had  become  pope  he  should 
have  been  addressed  as  Pope  Sil- 
vester. The  article  on  Ethelwold 
(DNB)  states  that  "a  treatise  on 
the  circle,  said  to  have  been  writ- 
ten by  him  and  addressed  to 
Gerbert,  afterwards  Pope  Silves- 
ter II,  is  in  the  Bodleian  Library 
(1684,  Bodl.  MS.  Digby  83,  f. 
24)."  William  of  Malmesbury 
mentioned  "Adelboldum  episco- 
pum,  ut  dicunt,  Winterbrugen- 
sem"  as  the  author  of  the  letter 
to  Gerbert,  quoted  by  Bubnov 
(1899),  388. 

'  It  has  always  been  so  printed : 
by  Pez,  Olleris,  Curtze,  and  Bub- 
nov, and  seems  to  be  ascribed  to 
him  in  most  MSS,  for  which  and 
other  evidence  pointing  to  the 
bishop  of  Utrecht  as  author  see 
Bubnov  (1899),  300-309,  41-45, 
384,  etc.  Bubnov,  however,  failed 
to  note  Digby  83  either  in  connec- 
tion with  this  letter  or  at  all  in 
his  long  list  of  mathematical 
MSS      (XVII-CXIX).     It     may 


therefore  be  well  to  note  that  the 
letter  as  given  in  Digby  83  differs 
considerably  from  the  version 
printed  by  Bubnov.  It  in  general 
omits  epistolary  amenities  which 
do  not  bear  directly  on  the  mathe- 
matical question  in  hand,  notably 
the  entire  first  paragraph  of  Bub- 
nov's  text  and  the  close  of  the 
second  and  third  paragraphs.  It 
also  abbreviates  portions  of  the 
fifth  paragraph  and  the  last  sen- 
tence of  the  eighth  and  last  para- 
graph. On  the  other  hand  after 
the  first  sentence  of  the  fifth  para- 
graph of  Bubnov's  text  it  inserts 
the  following  passage  which 
seems  to  be  missing  in  Bubnov's 
text  of  the  letter :  "Si  quis  ergo 
vult  invenire  quadraturam  circuli 
dividat  lineam  in  VII  partes 
spatiumque  unius  septime  partis 
semotim  ponat.  Deinde  lineam  in 
VII  divisam  in  duo  distribuat  et 
spatium  alterius  duorum  sep- 
aratim  ponat.  Post  hoc  lineam  in 
VII  partitam  triplicet  cui  tripli- 
cate spatium  unius  septime  quod 
semoverat  adiciat.  Ipsa  denique 
totam  in  IIII  partiatur  quarum 
quarta  angulis  directis  per  lineam 
quadrangulam  metiatur.  Ad  ulti- 
mum  sumpto  spatio  alterius  duo- 
rum  quod  prius  reposuerat  de- 
posito  puncto  in  medio  quad- 
ranguli  eodem  spatio  circumducat 
circinum  (circulum)  et  sic  in- 
veniet  circuli  quadraturam." 

*  Bubnov  (1899),  41-42,  "quod 
tantum  virum  quasi  conscolasti- 
cum  iuvenis  convenio." 


XXX  GERBERT  AND  ARABIC  ASTROLOGY  707 

wold,  unless  the  letter  be  a  later  interpolation,  but  it  is  pos- 
sibly by  Adelbold  or  by  Gerbert.^  Its  opening  words,  "Qui- 
cumque  mundane  spere  rationem  et  astrorum  legem  .  .  .  ," 
are  similar  to  those  of  the  treatise  on  the  uses  of  the  astro- 
labe which  has  often  been  ascribed  to  Gerbert,  "Quicumque 
astronomice  peritiam  discipline  .  .  ."  ^ 

Our  treatise  then  may  be  by  Gerbert  or  It  may  be  a  Contents 
specimen  of  the  astronomy  of  the  eleventh  or  early  twelfth  two  books, 
century.  As  it  appears  to  be  little  known  and  never  to 
have  been  published,  it  may  be  well  to  give  a  brief  summary 
of  its  contents.  An  introductory  paragraph  outlines  some 
of  the  chief  points  with  which  the  treatise  will  be  con- 
cerned, such  as  the  twelve  signs  of  the  zodiac,  their  positions, 
"most  varied  qualities,"  the  reasons  for  their  names,  and 
the  diverse  opinions  of  gentile  philosophers  and  Catholics 
as  to  their  significations;  the  four  elements;  and  the  seven 
planets.  In  the  text  which  follows,  these  topics  are  con- 
sidered in  rather  the  reverse  order  to  that  in  which  they 
were  named  in  the  preface.  After  some  discussion  of  "the 
founders  of  astronomy  and  the  doctors  of  astrology,"  the 
first  book  is  occupied  with  a  description  of  the  sphere  or 
heavens.  The  second  book  is  largely  geographical,  begin- 
ning with  the  question  of  the  size  of  the  earth,  the  zones, 
the  ocean,  and  how  to  draw  a  T  map.  This  geographical 
digression  the  author  justifies  in  the  prologue  to  his  third 
book  by  the  statement  that  often  the  position  of  the  stars 
can  be  determined  from  the  location  of  countries,  and  that 

*  Bubnov  does  not  include  it  in  fol.  17V,  after  which  most  of  the 

his    edition    of    the    mathematical  few  remaining  leaves  of  the  MS, 

works  of  Gerbert,  but  as  we  have  which   has   only  21    leaves   in  all, 

seen  he  was  unaware  of  the  exist-  are   blank.     There   is   some   simi- 

ence  of  this  MS,  i.e.,  Digby  83.  larity   of    contents,   but  the   Paris 

^And   also   to   the   Incipit   of   a  MS    is    more    astrological.      Pos- 

treatise  in  a  tenth  century  MS  at  sibly,    however,    it    is    a    different 

Paris,   BN   17,868,   fol.    I4r,  "Qui-  part  of,  or  rather  extracts   from 

cumque     nosse     desiderat     legem  the  same  work,  since  we  shall  see 

astrorum.  .  .  ."    The    treatise    or  reasons  for  thinking  that  the  text 

fragment  in  this  Paris  MS  seems  in  Digby  2>2  is  incomplete. 
to  end  at  fol.   I7r,  or  at  least  at 


7o8 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Attitude 
towards 
astrology. 


if  the  habitat  of  peoples  is  known  one  can  more  easily  arrive 
at  the  effect  of  the  stars. ^ 

This  suggests  that  the  author  believes  in  astrological  in- 
fluence, and  in  the  two  following  books  he  states  a  number 
of  astrological  doctrines,  not,  however,  as  his  own  convic- 
tions but  as  the  opinions  of  the  genethliaci  or  astrologers, 
or  "those  who  will  have  it  that  prosperity  and  adversity  in 
human  life  are  due  to  these  stars."  ^  On  the  other  hand, 
he  seldom  subjects  the  astrologers  to  any  adverse  criticism. 
Indeed,  early  in  the  third  book,  he  states  that  the  belief  of 
the  genethliaci  that  human  wealth  and  honors,  poverty  and 
obscurity,  depend  upon  the  stars,  pertains  to  another  subject 
than  that  which  he  is  at  present  discussing;  namely,  prog- 
nostication, concerning  which  he  will  treat  fully  in  later 
chapters.  But  I  cannot  see  that  he  fulfills  this  promise  in 
the  present  manuscript,  which  seems  to  end  rather  abruptly,^ 
so  that  possibly  there  is  something  missing.  In  the  previous 
passage,  however,  he  immediately  proceeded  to  admit  that 
the  sun  and  moon  greatly  affect  our  life  and  to  tell  further 
how  it  is  connected  with_  the  other  five  planets.  In  the  star 
of  Saturn  the  soul  is  said  to  busy  itself  especially  with  rea- 
soning and  intelligence,  logic  and  theory.  Jupiter  is  prac- 
tical and  represents  the  power  of  action.  Mars  signifies  ani- 
mosity; Venus,  desire;  Mercury,  interpretation.  Men  have 
proved  the  moon's  moist  influence  by  sleeping  out-of-doors 
and  finding  that  more  humor  collected  in  their  heads  when 
they  slept  in  the  moon-light  than  when  they  did  not.*  After 
mentioning  the  twelve  signs,  "through  which  the  aforesaid 
planets  revolving  exert  varied  influences,  and  even,  according 
to  the  genethliaci,  make  a  good  man  in  some  nativities  and 
a  bad  man  in  others,"  ^  the  author  goes  on  to  tell  which 


^  At  least  such  seems  to  me  to 
be  the  meaning  of  the  passage,  fol. 
2ir,  "Quippe  cum  aliquando  per 
situm  gentium  ipsarum  positionem 
stellarum  demonstrati  simus  pre- 
cognita  populorum  habitatione  rei 
effectus  ad  faciliorem  curret 
eventus." 

'  Fol.  22X. 


^  Fol.  76r,  the  closing  words 
are,  "Quod  autem  de  dementis 
diximus  idem  de  temporibus 
deque  humoribus  intellige  sicut 
hec  figura  evidentissime  desig- 
nat."    But  the  figure  is  not  given. 

*  Fol.  27v. 

''Fol.  31V,  "per  que  predict! 
planete  revoluti  diversa  in  diver- 


XXX 


GERBERT  AND  ARABIC  ASTROLOGY 


709 


signs  are  masculine  and  which  are  feminine,  to  relate  them 
to  the  four  cardinal  points  and  to  the  four  elements,  to  de- 
fine the  twenty-eight  mansions  and  their  distribution  among 
the  twelve  signs  and  seven  planets,^  and  to  tell  how  the 
planets  differ  in  quality.^  All  this  is  providing  at  least  the 
basis  for  astrological  prediction. 

The  fourth  book  of  the  treatise  is  mainly  taken  up  with  The 
descriptions  and  figures  of  the  constellations,  concerning  ijoojj 
which  the  author  often  repeats  the  fables  of  antiquity. 
After  discussing  the  six  ages  of  the  world,  the  author  in- 
tended to  insert  a  figure  on  what  is  the  next  to  last  page  of 
the  present  text  to  show  "the  harmony  of  the  elements, 
climates  of  the  sky,  times  of  the  year,  and  humors  of  the 
human  body,"  for,  as  he  goes  on  to  say,  man  is  called  a 
microcosm  by  the  philosophers.  This  missing  figure  or 
figures  would  have  been  analogous  to  those  which  Wickers- 
heimer  investigated  in  the  early  medieval  manuscripts  in 
the  libraries  of  France. 

Our  author  does  not  make  many  citations,  but  among  Citations; 
them  are  Eratosthenes,^  Aratus,  Ptolemy,  Macrobius,  and  names. 
Martianus  Capella.  Some  of  these  authors  are  perhaps 
known  to  him  only  indirectly,  and  he  seems  to  make  use  of 
Isidore  and  Pliny  without  mentioning  them.  He  shows, 
however,  an  acquaintance  with  foreign  languages,  listing 
the  seven  heavens  as  "oleth,  lothen,  ethat,  edim,  eliyd,  ha- 
chim,  atarpha,"  and  giving  Greek,  Hebrew,  and  "Saracen" 
names  for  the  seven  planets,  as  well  as  a  "Similitudo,"  or 
corresponding  metal,  and  "Interpretatio,"  or  quality  such  as 
"Obscurus,  Clarus,  Igneus."  *  He  also  gives  the  Arabic 
names  for  the  twenty-eight  mansions  into  which  the  circle 
of  the  zodiac  subdivides.^  We  now  turn  to  another  treatise, 
found  in  tenth  and  eleventh  century  manuscripts,  in  which 
Arabian  influence  is  apparent. 


sis  possunt  et  etiam  secundum 
genethliacos  bonum  quidam  in 
quibusdam  malum  vero  in  quibus- 
dam  quidam  nativitatibus  homi- 
nem  astruunt," 


^  Fol.  32r. 

'  Fol.  36r. 

*  Fol.  59r,  "Herastotenes." 

■*  Fol.  2ir-v. 

"  Fol.  32r, 


710 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


The 

Mathe- 
matica  of 
Alchan- 
drus  or 
Alhan- 
dreus. 


William  of  Malmesbury,  writing  in  the  first  half  of  the 
twelfth  century  concerning  Gerbert's  studies  in  Spain,  says, 
probably  with  a  great  deal  of  exaggeration,  that  Gerbert 
surpassed  Ptolemy  in  his  knowledge  of  the  astrolabe,  Alan- 
draeus  in  his  knowledge  of  the  distances  between  the  stars, 
and  Julius  Firmicus  in  his  knowledge  of  fate.^  It  is  rather 
remarkable  that  a  work  ascribed  to  Alhandreus  or  Alcandrus, 
"supreme  astrologer,"  should  be  found  in  two  manuscripts 
of  the  eleventh  century  ^  in  both  of  which  occurs  also  the 
work  on  the  astrolabe  which  is  perhaps  by  Gerbert,  while 
in  one  is  found  also  the  Mathesis  of  Julius  Firmicus  Ma- 
ternus.  Alchadrinus  or  Archandrinus  is  cited  in  Michael 
Scot's  long  Introduction  to  Astrology  as  the  author  of  a 
"book  of  fortune  making  mention  of  the  three  fades  of  the 
signs  and  the  planets  ruling  in  them,"  and  Michael  adds  that 
a  similar  method  of  divination  is  employed  in  general  among 
the  Arabs  and  Indians  as  can  be  seen  in  the  streets  and 
alleys  of  Messina  where  "learned  women"  answer  the  ques- 
tions of  merchants.^  Peter  of  Abano  in  his  Lucidator  as- 
tronomiae,'^  written  in  13 lo,  mentions  Alchandrus  as  a  suc- 
cessor of  Hermes  Trismegistus  in  the  science  of  astronomy 
but  as  flourishing  before  the  time  of  Nebuchadnezzar.  Al- 
chandrus was  probably  scarcely  as  ancient  as  that,  but  the 
treatise  ascribed  to  him  also  exists  in  Latin  in  a  manuscript 
of  the  tenth  century,^  and  seems  to  be  a  translation  from 


^De  rebus  gestis  regum  Anglo- 
rum,  II,  167. 

^'Addit.  17808,  fols.  85V-99V, 
"Mathematica  Alhandrei  summi 
astrologi.  Luna  est  frigide  nature 
«t  argentei  coloris  /  oculis  descrip- 
tio  talis  subiciatur" :  and  CLM 
560,  fols.  61-87,  which  I  have  not 
seen  but  which  from  the  descrip- 
tion in  the  catalogue  is  evidently 
the  same  treatise  and  has  the  same 
Incipit,  although  no  author  or 
title  seems  to  be  given. 

^Bodleian  266,  fol.  179V,  "libel- 
lum  fortune  faciens  mentionem 
de  tribus  faciebus  signorum  et 
planetis  regnantibus  in  eisdem 
.  .  .  mulieres  docte." 

*BN    2598,     isth    century,    fol. 


io8r. 

"BN  17868,  fols.  2r-i2v.  "In- 
cipit liber  Alchandrei"  ( Wicker s- 
heimer)  or  Alchandri  (Bubnov) 
"philosophi.  Luna  est  frigide 
nature  et  argentei  coloris."  In 
a  passage  of  Addit.  17808,  fol. 
86v,  where  the  years  from  the 
beginning  of  the  world  are  being 
reckoned,  the  year  of  writing  is 
apparently  given  as  1040  A.  D.,  but 
the  existence  of  the  treatise  in 
BN  17868  shows  that  it  was  writ- 
ten before  1000.  Also  there  is 
something  wrong  with  the  pas- 
sage mentioned  in  Addit.  17808 — 
as  is  very  apt  to  be  the  case  with 
such  figures  in  medieval  MSS — 
for  the  number  of  years  from  the 


XXX 


GERBERT  AND  ARABIC  ASTROLOGY 


711 


the  Arabic.  In  any  case  it  is  full  of  Arabic  and  Hebrew 
words,  and  professes  to  cite  the  opinions  of  Egyptians, 
Ishmaelites,  and  Chaldeans  in  general  as  well  as  those  of 
Ascalu  the  Ishmaelite  and  Arfarfan  or  Argafalan  or  Ar- 
gafalaus  ^  the  Chaldean  in  particular.  Since  the  name  Al- 
chandrus  or  Alhandreus  is  found  so  far  as  I  know  in  no 
historian  or  bibliographer  of  Arabian  literature  or  learning,^ 
we  shall  treat  somewhat  fully  of  the  work  and  its  author 
here. 

The  "Mathematic  of  Alhandreus,  supreme  astrologer," 
as  it  is  entitled  in  one  manuscript,  opens  somewhat  abruptly 
with  a  terse  statement  of  the  qualities  of  the  planets.  Two 
estimates  of  the  number  of  years  between  creation  and  the 
birth  of  Christ  are  then  given,  one  "according  to  the  He- 
brews," the  other  "according  to  others."  ^  There  follow 
letters  of  the  Greek  alphabet  with  Roman  numerals  express- 
ing their  respective  numerical  values,  perhaps  for  future  ref- 
erence in  connection  with  some  sphere  of  life  or  death.  Next 
is  considered  the  division  of  the  zodiac  into  twelve  signs  for 
which  Hebrew  as  well  as  Latin  names  are  given.  The  move- 
ments of  the  planets  through  the  signs  are  then  discussed, 
and  it  is  explained  in  the  usual  astrological  style  that  Leo  is 
the  house  of  the  sun.  Cancer  of  the  moon,  while  two  signs 
are  assigned  to  each  of  the  other  five  planets.  Every  planet 
is  erect  in  some  one  sign  and  falls  in  its  opposite,  and  any 
planet  is  friendly  to  another  in  whose  house  it  is  erect  and 
hostile  to  another  in  whose  house  it  declines.  Presently 
the  author  treats  of  "the  order  of  the  planets  according  to 
nature  and  their  names  according  to  the  Hebrews,"  ■*  and 
then  of  their  sex  and  courses,  which  last  leads  to  considerable 


An  ac- 
count of 
its  con- 
tents. 


beginning  of  the  world  to  the 
birth  of  Christ  is  given  as  4970 
and  then  the  sum  of  the  two  as 
6018  instead  of  6010  years,  while 
at  fol.  85V  other  estimates  are 
given  of  the  number  of  years  be- 
tween the  Creation  and  the  In- 
carnation. 

*  The   spellings   of   such   proper 
names  vary  in  the  different  MSS 


or  even  in  the  same  one. 

'  Steinschneider  (1905)  30, 
briefly  notes  "Alcandrinus,"  how- 
ever. See  below,  p.  715  of  the 
present  chapter. 

"Addit.  17808,  fol.  Ssv;  BN 
17868,  fol.  2r. 

'  Addit.  17808,  f  ols.  86r-87r ;  BN 
17868,  fol.  3v. 


712 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


digressions  anent  the  solar  and  lunar  calendars.^    Then  the 
twelve  signs  are  related  to  the  four  "climates"  and  elements. 

All  this  implies  a  favorable  attitude  to  astrology,  and  the 
author  has  already  expressed  his  conviction  more  than  once 
that  human  affairs  are  disposed  by  the  seven  planets  accord- 
ing to  the  will  of  God.^  Since  man  like  the  world  is  com- 
posed of  the  four  elements  it  is  no  false  opinion  which  per- 
suades us  that  under  God's  government  human  affairs  are 
principally  regulated  by  the  celestial  bodies.^  To  make  this 
plainer  the  author  proposes  to  insert  an  astrological  figure 
"which  Alexander  of  Macedon  composed  most  diligently," 
and  which  presumably  would  have  been  of  the  microcosmus 
or  Melothesia  type,  but  the  space  for  it  remains  blank  in 
the  manuscript.  Next  comes  a  paragraph  on  the  sex  of  the 
signs  and  their  rising  and  setting,  and  then  lists  of  the  hours 
of  the  day  and  night  governed  by  the  signs  and  by  each 
planet  for  all  the  days  of  the  week.^ 

Then  we  read,  "These  are  the  twenty-eight  principal 
parts  or  stars  (i.e.  constellations)  through  which  the  fates 
of  all  are  disposed  and  pronounced  indubitably,  future  as 
well  as  present.  Anyone  may  with  diligence  forecast  goings 
and  returnings,  origins  and  endings,  by  the  most  agreeable 
aid  of  these  horoscopes 


"  5 


*  Addit.  17808,  fols.  87v-88r. 

^'BN  17868,  fol.  2r;  Addit. 
17808,  fol.  8sv;  "luxta  que  quia 
omnia  humana  secundum  nutum 
dei  disponuntur  per  septem  plane- 
tas  que  subter  (subtus)  feruntur 
eorum  nobis  potestas  innuitur" : 
BN  17868,  fol.  3r;  Addit.  17808, 
fol.  86v,  "Per  has  autem  vii  plane- 
tas  quia  ut  diximus  et  adhuc  pro- 
babimus  humana  fata  disponuntur 
regulam  certam  demus  qua  in  quo 
signo  queque  sit  pronoscatur." 
Only  in  a  third  passage  does  he 
attribute  such  views  to  the  mathe- 
matici;  Addit.  17808,  _  fol.  88v, 
"Cum  sint  signa  xii  in  zodiaco 
cumque  iuxta  mathematicos  et 
secundum  horum  diversissimos 
potestates  fata  omnium  ita  volente 
sapientissimo  domino  disponan- 
tur " 


These  twenty-eight  parts  are 

'Addit.  17808,  fol.  Spr,  "Que 
quum  ita  discernuntur  non  falsa 
opinio  persuasit  istis  humana 
principaliter  gubernante  domino 
moderari  cum  itaque  ut  mundus 
homo  unusquisque  ex  his  iiii  com- 
paginetur  elementis." 

"Addit.  17808,  fol.  89V.  But  the 
lists  are  left  incomplete  and  a 
blank  leaf,  which  is  also  left  un- 
numbered, follows  in  the  MS. 

'BN  17868,  fol.  5r:  Addit. 
17808,  fol.  QOr,  "Hec  sunt  xxviii 
principales  partes  vel  astra  per 
que  omnium  fata  disponuntur  et 
indubitanter  tam  futura  quam 
presentia  prenuntiantur  a  quo- 
cumque  itus  reditus  ortus  occasus 
horum  horoscoporum  iocundis- 
simo  auxilio  diligenter  providen- 
tur." 


XXX  GERBERT  AND  ARABIC  ASTROLOGY  713 

of  course  the  sub-divisions  of  the  zodiac  into  mansions  of 
the  sun  or  moon  which  we  have  already  encountered,  and 
Arabic  names  are  given  for  them  beginning  with  Alnait,  the 
first  part  of  the  sign  Aries.  First,  however,  we  are  in- 
structed how  to  determine  under  which  one  of  them  anyone 
was  bom  by  a  numerical  calculation  of  the  value  of  his 
name  and  that  of  his  natural  mother  similar  to  that  of  the 
spheres  of  life  and  death  except  that  it  is  based  upon  He- 
brew instead  of  Greek  letters.^  Then  follow  statements  of 
the  sort  of  men  who  are  born  under  each  of  the  twenty-eight 
mansions,  their  physical,  mental,  and  moral  characteristics, 
and  any  especial  marks  upon  the  body, — either  birth-marks 
or  inflicted  subsequently  by  such  means  as  hot  irons  and 
dog-bite, — their  health  or  sickness,  term  of  life,  and  manner 
of  death, — which  in  the  case  of  Alnait,  the  first  mansion, 
will  be  "by  the  machinations  or  imaginations  of  the  magic 
arts."  ^  Also  the  number  of  their  children  is  roughly  pre- 
dicted. 

Next  is  discussed  the  course  of  the  planets  through  the   Interroga- 
signs,  the  houses  of  the  planets,  and  their  positions  in  the   more 

signs  at  creation.^     The  author  then  turns  to  the  influence   name-cal- 
°  .  culations. 

of  the  planets  upon  men  and  gives  another  method  of  nu- 
merical calculation  of  a  man's  name  in  order  to  determine 
which  planet  he  is  under. ^  Under  the  heading  "Excerpts 
from  the  books  of  Alexander,  the  astrologer  king,"  ^  direc- 
tions are  given  for  the  recovery  of  lost  or  stolen  articles  and 
descriptions  of  the  thief  are  provided  for  the  hour  of  each 
planet.  The  letter  of  Argafalaus  to  Alexander  instructs 
how  to  read  men's  secret  thoughts  as  Plato  the  Philosopher 
used  to  do,  and  how  to  tell  what  is  hidden  in  a  person's 
hand  by  means  of  the  hours  of  the  planets.^  After  some  fur- 
liber  primus.  Incipit  liber  secun- 
dus."  And  then  begins  the  letter 
of  Argafalaus  with  the  words, 
"Regi  macedonum  Alexandre  as- 
trologo  et  universa  philosophia 
perfectissimo  Argafalaus  servuus 
suus  condicione  et  nacione  in- 
genuus  caldeus,  professione  vero 
secundus  ab  illo  astrologus." 


*BN  17868,  fol.  5v. 

="  BN  17868,  fol.  6r. 

'BN     17868,    fol.    9r-; 

;    Addit. 

17808,  fols.  94V-95V. 

■"BN     17868,    fol.     lor; 

Addit. 

17808,  fol.  96r. 

°Addit.  17808,  fol.  97r. 

"Addit.  17808,  fol.  97V. 

In  BN 

178GS,  fol.  iir,  we  read,  ' 

"Explicit 

714 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


ther  discussion  of  astrological  interrogations  the  manuscript 
at  the  British  Museum  closes  with  the  Breviary  of  Alhan- 
dreus,  supreme  astrologer/  for  learning  anything  unknown 
by  a  method  of  computation  from  Hebrew  and  Arabic  let- 
ters. 

Someone  may  wonder  if  the  names  Alhandreus  and  Al- 
chandrus  may  not  be  mere  corruptions  of  Alexander  who  is 
cited  and  quoted  even  more  than  has  yet  been  indicated,^ 
and  if  some  careless  head-line  writer  has  not  inserted  the 
name  Alchandri  or  Allmndrei  instead  of  Alexandri  in  the 
Tittdus.  But  this  would  leave  the  statements  of  William 
of  Malmesbury  and  of  Peter  of  Abano  to  be  explained  away. 
Or,  if  it  is  argued  that  the  name  of  Alhandreus  should  be 
attached  only  to  the  Breviary,  it  must  be  remembered  that 
in  the  earliest  manuscript,  which  does  not  contain  the 
Breviary,  the  treatise  is  none  the  less  called  the  Book  of 
Alchandreus.  As  a  matter  of  fact  there  is  found  also  in 
the  manuscripts  a  "Mathematica  Alexandri  summi  astro- 
logi,"  ^  but  while  the  title  is  the  same,  the  contents  are  dif- 
ferent from  the  "Mathematica  Alhandrei  summi  astrologi." 

However,  the  treatise  itself  is  found  together  with  the 


*Addit.  17808,  fol.  99r-v.  This 
does  not  appear  in  BN  17868 
which  goes  on  to  discuss  various 
astrological  influences  of  the  12 
hours  of  the  day  and  of  the  night. 
After  this  there  is  a  space  left 
blank  in  the  middle  of  fol.  I2v: 
then  more  is  said  concerning 
hours  of  the  planets  and  inter- 
rogations until  at  the  bottom  of 
fol.  I3r  comes  the  letter  of 
Phethosiris  to  Nechepso.  But  no 
definite  ending  is  indicated  either 
of  the  letter  of  Argafalaus  or  the 
Liber  Secundus  of  Alchandrus. 

In  a  MS  now  missing  but  listed 
in  the  late  15th  century  catalogue 
of  the  MSS  in  the  library  of  St. 
Augustine's  Abbey,  Canterbury 
(No.  1 172,  James  332)  was  a 
"Breviarium  alhandredi  su'm  as- 
trologi  et  peritissimi  de  soia 
(scienda?)  qualibet  ignota  nullo 
decrete."  This  was  one  of  the 
MSS    donated    to    the    monastery 


by  John  of   London. 

BN  4161,  i6th  century,  #5,  Bre- 
viarium Alhandriae,  summi  As- 
trologi,  de  scientia  qualiter  ignota 
nullo    indicante    investigari   possit. 

'Addit.  17808,  fol.  89r,  "figu- 
ram  quam  super  hac  re  Alexander 
Macedo  composuit  diligentissime 
posterius  describemus" ;  fol.  95r, 
"Hinc  Alexander  macedo  dicit 
eclipsin  solis  et  lune  certissima 
ratione  colligi" ;  fol.  g6r.  "Aut 
iuxta  alexandrum  macedonem 
draco  quasi  octava  planeta." 

'Ashmole  369,  late  13th  cen- 
tury, fols.  77-84V.  "Mathematica 
Alexandri  summi  astrologi.  In 
exordio  omnis  creature  herus 
huranicus  inter  cuncta  sidera  XII 
maluit  signa  fore  .../...  nam 
quod  lineam  designat  eandem  stel- 
1am  occupat.  Explicit."  A  fur- 
ther discussion  of  the  contents  of 
this  work  will  be  found  below  in 
Chapter  48,  vol.  II,  p.  259. 


XXX  GERBERT  AND  ARABIC  ASTROLOGY  715 

Mathematica  Alhandrei  in  a  tenth  century  manuscript.^  But 
no  author  is  mentioned,  and  instead  of  Mathematica  the 
title  reads  "Incipiunt  proportiones  cppfcfntfs  knkstrprx  in- 
dxstrkb,"  which  may  be  deciphered  as  "Incipiunt  propor- 
tiones competentes  in  astrorum  industria."  ^  Possibly  there- 
fore this  treatise  is  a  part  of  the  work  of  Alchander,  and 
the  title  Mathematica  Alexandri  is  an  error  for  Mathematica 
Alhandrei. 

Moreover,  in  later  manuscripts  we  encounter  authors   Alkandri- 
with  names  very  similar  to  Alchandrus  and  works  by  them   Alchan- 

of  the  same  sort  as  that  we  have  just  considered.    In  a  fif-  drmus  on 

/-\    r      1  r     ^  mi  nativities 

teenth  century  manuscript  at  Oxford  we  find  ascribed  to   according 

Alkandrinus  an  account  of  the  types  of  men  born  in  each  ^a^sfons 
of  the  twenty-eight  mansions  of  the  moon  ^  such  as  we  have  of  the 
seen  formed  a  part  of  the  Mathematica  Alhandrei.  And  in 
a  fifteenth  century  manuscript  at  Paris  occurs  under  the 
name  of  Alchandrinus  what  seems  to  be  a  Christian  revi- 
sion of  that  same  part  of  the  Mathematica  Alhandrei.'^ 
What  appears  to  be  another  revision  and  working  over  of 
this  same  discussion  of  nativities  according  to  the  twenty- 
eight  mansions  of  the  moon  ^  appeared  in  print  a  number 
of  times  in  the  sixteenth  and  seventeenth  centuries  and  in 

*  BN  17868,  f  ol.  I7r.  The  183V  ".  .  .  finem  f  ecimus.  _  Com- 
Incipit  is  the  same  as  in  Ash-  pleta  fuit  hec  compilatio  in  con- 
mole  369.  The  work  here  seems  versione  sancti  pauli  apostoli 
to  be  incomplete,  since  after  fol.  anno  domini  1350  (1305?)  vacante 
17V  most  of  the  remaining  leaves  sede  per  mortem  Benedicti  un- 
of  the  MS  (which  has  21  fols.  in  decimi  cuius  anima  requiescat  in 
all)  are  blank.  pace.     Amen."     It    would   there- 

*The   vowels   being  represented  fore  seem  that  some  compiler  has 

by    the    consonants    following,    a  made  an  extract  from  Alchandrus 

common  medieval  cipher.  on  the  twenty-eight  mansions. 

*A11    Souls    81,     15th    century,  *  BN    10271,    fols.    9r-52v,    "In- 

fols.     I45v-i64r.      "Cum     sint    28  cipit    liber   alchandrini    philosophi 

mansiones    lune.  .  .  ."  Coxe    was  de   nativitatibus   hominum   secun- 

mistaken     in     thinking     that     the  dum       compositionem      duodecim 

work  of  Alkandrinus  continued  to  signorum    celi,    quem    reformavit 

fol.  188  and  was  in  two  parts,  for  quidem      philosophus       cristianus 

at   fol.   i63r  we  read,  "Expliciunt  prout    patet,    quia    in    quibusdam 

iudicia  libri   Alkandrini   que   sunt  differt      iste      liber      ab      antique 

in    divisione   triplici    12   signorum  primordiali.     Primo  facies  arietis 

que     sunt     apparencie    per    certa  in  homine  sive  in  masculo.    Alna- 

tempora    super    terram."      More-  liet  est  prima   facies  arietis.  .  .  ." 

over,   the   seven   chapters   on   the  *  Steinschneider  (1905),  30. 
planets   which   follow  end  at  fol. 


7i6 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Albandi- 
nus. 


Geomancy 
of  Alkar- 
dianus  or 
Alchandi- 
andus. 


French  and  English  translations  as  well  as  Latin.  The 
author's  name  in  these  printed  editions  is  usually  given  as 
Arcandam,  but  the  English  edition  of  1626  adds  "or  Al- 
chandrin."  ^ 

Two  other  manuscripts  at  Paris  ^  contain  under  the  name 
of  Albandinus  a  "book  of  similitudes  of  the  sons  of  Adam, 
fortunate  and  unfortunate,  of  life  or  death,  according  to 
nations,  that  is,  their  nativities  according  to  the  twelve 
signs."  The  treatise  opens  with  a  method  of  calculating 
a  person's  nativity  from  the  letters  in  his  own  and  his 
mother's  name  similar  to  that  which  occurs  in  the  course  of 
the  Mathematica  Alliandrei,  but  then  applies  it  directly  to 
the  twelve  signs  rather  than  to  the  twenty-eight  mansions 
of  the  moon.  It  also  does  not  bother  with  the  Hebrew  alpha- 
bet but  gives  numerical  equivalents  directly  for  the  Latin 
letters.  Some  treatise  by  Albandinus  on  sickness  and  the 
signs  in  a  manuscript  at  Munich  ^  is  perhaps  identical  with 
the  foregoing. 

To  an  Alkardianus  or  Alchandiandus  is  ascribed  a  geo- 
mancy,* and  since  it  also  is  arranged  according  to  the  twenty- 
eight  divisions  of  the  zodiac  with  28  judges  and  28  chapters 
each  consisting  of  28  lines  in  answer  to  as  many  ques- 
tions, it  would  seem  almost  certain  that  it  is  by  the  same 
author  who  treated  of  the  influences  of  the  28  houses  or 


*  The  editio  princeps  seems  to 
be  "Arcandam  doctor  peritissimus 
ac  non  vulgaris  astrologus,  de 
veritatibus  et  praedictionibus 
astrologiae  et  praecipue  nativita- 
tum  seu  fatalis  dispositionis  vel 
diei  cuiuscunque  nati,  nuper  per 
Magistrum  Richardum  Roussat, 
canonicum  Lingoniensem,  artium 
et  medicinae  professorem,  de  con- 
fuse ac  indistincto  stilo  non  minus 
quam  e  tenebris  in  lucem  aeditus, 
re  cognitus,  ac  innumeris  (ut  pote 
passim)  erratis  expurgatus,  ita  ut 
per  multa  maxime  necessaria  et 
utilissima  adiecerit  atque  adnota- 
verit  modo  eiusdem  dexteritate 
praelo  primo  donatus."  Paris, 
1542. 

The  British  Museum  also  con- 


tains another  Latin  edition  of 
Paris,  1553 ;  French  editions  of 
Rouen,  1584  and  1587,  Lyons 
1625 ;  and  English  versions  printed 
at  London,  1626  (translated  from 
the  French),  1630,  1637,  and  1670. 

'BN  7349,  15th  century,  fol. 
56r,  seems  only  a  fragment  of  the 
work;  BN  7351,  14th  century, 
takes  up  the  various  signs. 

*CLM  527,  I3-I4th  century, 
fols.  36-42,  de  physica  signorum  et 
supernascentium   et  aegrotantium. 

*Addit.  15236,  English  hand  of 
I3-I4th  century,  fols.  i30-52r, 
"libellus  Alchandiandi."  BN  7486, 
14th  century,  "Incipit  liber  alkar- 
diani  phylosophi.  Cum  omne 
quod  experitur  sit  experiendum 
propter  se  vel  propter  aliud.  .  .  ." 


XXX  GERBERT  AND  ARABIC  ASTROLOGY  717 

fades  of  the  twelve  signs  upon  those  born  under  them. 
Moreover,  this  Alkardianus  or  Alchandiandus  states  in  his 
preface  that  he  has  composed  certain  books  on  the  disposi- 
tions of  the  signs  and  the  courses  of  the  planets  and  on 
prediction  of  the  future  from  them.  "But  since  modems 
always  rejoice  in  brevity,"  he  has  added  this  handy  and 
rapid  geomantic  means  of  answering  questions  and  ascer- 
taining the  decrees  of  the  stars.  The  28  tables  of  28  lines 
each  of  this  Alkardianus  or  Alchandiandus  are  identical 
with  one  of  the  two  such  sets  ^  commonly  included  in  the 
Experimentarins  ^  of  Bernard  Silvester,  a  work  of  geomancy 
which  he  is  said  to  have  translated  from  the  Arabic.^  He 
lived  in  the  twelfth  century  and  will  be  the  subject  of  one  of 
our  later  chapters. 

It  still  remains  to  speak  of  a  portion  of  our  tenth  cen-   Ananony- 
tury  manuscript  at  Paris  which  begins,  after  the  book  of   Jfse^or^^*' 
Alchandrus    seems    to    have    concluded,    with   the    words,    fragment 
"Quicunque  nosse  desiderat  legem  astrorum  ..."■*     This    tenth 
Incipit  is  so  similar  to  that  of  the  twenty-one  chapters  on   century, 
the   astrolabe,    "Quicumque   astronomiam   peritiam   discip- 
linae  .  .  ."  and  to  that  of  the  four  books  of  astronomy, 
"Quicumque  mundane  spere  rationem  et  astrorum,"  that  one 
is  tempted  to  imply  some  relation  between  them,  and,  in  view 
of  the  tenth  century  date  of  the  one  at  present  in  question, 
to  connect  it  like  the  others  with  the  name  of  Gerbert.    Our 
present  treatise  or  fragment  of  a  treatise  is  largely  astro- 
logical in  character,  "following  for  the  present  the  wisdom 
of  the  mathematici  who  think  that  mundane  affairs  are  car- 
ried on  under  the  rule  of  the  constellations."    This  refusal 
to  accept  personal  responsibility  for  astrological  doctrine  is 
similar  to  the  attitude  of  the  author  of  the  four  books  of 

*  The  set  in  which  the  first  line  of  life  and  death  at  f ol.  I3r-v 
reads.  "Tuum  indumentum  dura-  "Incipit  epistola  Phetosiri  de 
bit  tempore  longo."  sphaera"  separates  this  treatise  or 

'  Very    probably    this    title    was  fragment      from     the     preceding 

derived  from  the  Incipit  just  given  liber  Alchandri  philosophi.     Also 

in  note  4,  p.  716.  this  treatise  is  in  a  different  and 

*  See  Sloane  2472,  3554,  3857.  slightly   older   hand   than   fols.  2- 
*BN    17868,    fol.    I4r-i6v.     The  13  are,  or  at  least  such  was  Bub- 
letter  of   Petosiris  on  the  sphere  nov's  opinion  (1899),  125,  note. 


7i8     MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE     chap,  xxx 

astronomy,  so  that  perhaps  the  present  text  is  the  missing 
fragment  required  to  fulfil  his  promise  to  treat  of  the  sub- 
ject of  prognostication  in  later  chapters.  If  so  it  indulges 
in  some  repetition,  as  it  goes  into  the  relations  existing  be- 
tween signs,  planets,  and  elements,  and  gives  the  "Saracen" 
names  ^  for  the  twenty-eight  mansions  of  the  moon.  It  in- 
cludes a  way  to  detect  theft  for  each  planet  and  a  method  of 
determining  if  a  patient  will  recover  by  computation  of  the 
numerical  value  of  the  letters  in  his  name.  These  features 
are  suggestive  of  the  Mathematica  of  Alchandrus. 

*  BN  17686,  f ol.  14V,  "que  sarraceni  nuncupant  ita." 


CHAPTER  XXXI 

ANGLO-SAXON,,    SALERNITAN,    AND    OTHER    LATIN    MEDICINE 

IN    MANUSCRIPTS   FROM    THE    NINTH    TO   THE 

TWELFTH    CENTURY 

Plan  of  this  chapter — Instances  of  early  medieval  additions  to  an- 
cient medicine — Leech-Book  of  Bald  and  Cild — Magical  procedure  and 
incantations — A  superstitious  compound — Summary — Cauterization — 
Treatment  of  demoniacs — Incantations  and  characters — In  a  twelfth 
century  manuscript — Magic  with  a  split  hazel  rod — More  incantations 
and  the  virtues  of  a  vulture — Lots  of  the  saints — Superstitious  veteri- 
nary and  medical  practice — Two  Paris  manuscripts — Blood-letting — 
Resemblances  to  Egerton  821 — Virtues  of  blood — Pious  incantations  and 
magical  procedure — More  superstitious  veterinary  practice — The  School 
of  Salerno — Was  Salernitan  medicine  free  from  superstition? — The 
Practica  of  Petrocellus — Its  sources — Fourfold  origin  of  medicine — 
Therapeutics  of  Petrocellus — The  Regimen  Salernitanum — Its  supersti- 
tion— The  Practica  of  Archimatthaeus — A  Salernitan  treatise  of  about 
1200— The  wives  of  Salerno. 

In  this  chapter  our  purpose  is  to  treat  of  early  medieval  Plan  of 
medicine  as  distinct  on  the  one  hand  from  post-classical  chapter, 
medicine,  to  which  we  have  already  devoted  a  chapter,  and 
on  the  other  hand  from  later  medieval  medicine  as  affected 
by  translations  from  the  Arabic  and  other  oriental  influ- 
ence. Perhaps  one  of  the  outcomes  of  our  discussion  will 
be  to  suggest  that  any  such  distinctions  cannot  be  at  all 
sharply  or  chronologically  drawn.  However,  the  writings 
which  we  shall  discuss  now  are  contained  mainly  in  manu- 
scripts dating  from  the  ninth  to  the  twelfth  century,  although 
some  of  them  may  have  been  first  composed  at  an  earlier  date 
than  that  of  the  manuscript  in  which  they  chance  to  be  pre- 
served. Some  are  in  Anglo-Saxon ;  more,  in  Latin.  Some 
it  has  been  customary  to  classify  under  the  caption  of  Sa- 
lernitan. We  shall  postpone  until  the  next  chapter  our  con- 
sideration of  Constantinus  Africanus,  although  the  dates  of 

719 


720 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Instances 
of  early 
medieval 
additions 
to  ancient 
medicine. 


Leech- 
Book  of 
Bald  and 

aid. 


his  life  fall  within  the  eleventh  century,  because  he  already 
at  that  early  date  represents  the  introduction  of  Arabic 
medicine  to  the  western  world. 

A  good  instance  of  the  working  over  by  men  of  the 
early  medieval  period  of  the  medical  writings  of  the  late 
Roman  period  is  provided  by  a  manuscript  of  the  ninth  or 
tenth  century  at  Berlin.^  It  now  consists  of  a  number  of 
fragments  whose  original  order  can  no  longer  be  determined. 
These  are  made  up  of  extracts  from  different  sources  or  from 
other  collections,  but  the  collection  also  bears  the  mark  of 
its  last  compiler  who  has  introduced  new  remedies  of  his 
own  and  words  derived  from  the  vernacular  of  his  day. 
Even  extracts  on  fevers  taken  from  the  old  Latin  adaptation 
of  Galen  ^  are  added  to  by  some  Christian  physician,  who 
introduces  among  other  things  some  incantations,  such  as, 
*'I  adjure  you,  spots,  that  you  go  away  and  recede  from  and 
be  destroyed  from  the  eye  of  the  servant  of  God."  ^  The 
manuscript  also  comprises  more  than  one  tract  on  how 
dreams  or  the  fate  of  the  patient  or  child  born  can  be  fore- 
told from  the  day  of  the  moon.*  Another  tract  ^  tells  how 
God  made  the  first  man  out  of  eight  parts,  of  which  the  first 
was  the  mud  of  the  earth  and  the  last  the  light  of  the  world. 
This  would  seem  to  be  rather  a  novel  departure  from  the 
usual  four  element  theory  but  perhaps  involves  ancient 
Gnostic  error.  The  author  further  argues  that  individual 
divergences  of  character  depend  upon  the  preponderance  of 
one  or  another  of  the  eight  constituents  of  the  body. 

The  Anglo-Saxon  Leech-Book  of  Bald  and  Cild  ^  has 
been  called  "the  first  medical  treatise  written  in  western  Eu- 


*  Berlin  165  (Phillips  1790),  9- 
loth  century.  I  have  not  seen  the 
MS,  but  follow  Rose's  full  de- 
scription of  it  in  his  Verzeichnis 
der  lateinischen  Handschriften,  I, 
362-9. 

"  Cod.  Casin.  97  Gal.  I,  24-51. 
'Berlin  165,  fol.  88. 

*  Ibid.,  fols.  40-2. 
'  Ibid.,  fol.  39V. 

"  Edited  with  an  English  trans- 
lation, which  I  employ  in  my  quo- 
tations, by  Rev.  Oswald  Cockayne 


in  vol.  II  of  his  Leechdoms,  Wort- 
cunning,  and  Starcraft  of  Early 
England,  in  RS  vol.  35,  in  3  vols., 
London,  1864- 1866.  The  relation 
of  Bald  and  Cild  to  the  work  is 
indicated  by  the  colophon  at  the 
close  of  the  second  book :  "Bald 
habet  hunc  librum,  Cild  quem 
conscribere  iussit," — "Bald  owns 
this  book ;  Cild  is  the  one  he  told 
to  write  (or  copy?)  it."  The  fol- 
lowing third  book  is  therefore 
presumably  of  other  authorship. 


XXXI       MEDICINE  TO  THE  TWELFTH  CENTURY        721 

rope  which  can  be  said  to  belong  to  modern  history."  ^  It 
was  produced  in  the  tenth  century.  However,  it  extracts  a 
good  deal  from  late  Greek  medical  writers,  such  as  Paul  of 
Aegina  and  Alexander  of  Tralles,  and  cites  Pliny,  "the  mickle 
leech,"  for  the  cure  of  baldness  by  application  of  dead  bees 
burnt  to  ashes, ^  a  remedy  also  found  in  the  Euporista  as- 
cribed to  Galen.  On  the  whole,  however,  it  uses  parts  of 
animals  somewhat  less  than  Pliny,  although  sometimes  a 
powdered  earthworm  is  recommended,  or  a  man  stung  by 
an  adder  is  to  drink  holy  water  in  which  a  black  snail  has 
been  washed,  or  the  bite  of  a  viper  is  to  be  smeared  with  ear- 
wax  while  thrice  repeating  "the  prayer  of  Saint  John."  ^ 
And  a  man  about  to  engage  in  combat  is  advised  to  eat 
swallow  nestlings  boiled  in  wine.^  Herbs  are  as  useful 
against  a  woman's  tongue  as  birds  against  a  foeman's  steel, 
for  we  are  told  :  "Against  a  woman's  chatter;  taste  at  night 
fasting  a  root  of  radish;  that  day  the  chatter  cannot  harm 
thee."  ^  There  are  directions  for  plucking  herbs  similar  to 
those  in  Pliny,®  and  the  significance  which  he  ascribed  to 
cart  ruts  is  paralleled  by  the  injunction,  after  one  has  treated 
a  venomous  bite  by  striking  five  scarifications,  one  on  the 
bite  and  four  around  it,  to  "throw  the  blood  with  a  spoqft 
silently  over  a  wagon  way."  '^  Eight  virtues  of  the  stone 
agate  are  enumerated.^ 

Not  only  such  occult  virtues  of  animals,  vegetables,  and    Magical 
minerals,  but  also  magical  procedure  and  incantations  abound    and*^fncan- 
in  the  work.     In  a  prescription  "for  flying  venom  and  every    tations. 
venomous  swelling"  butter  is  to  be  churned  on  a  Friday 
from  the  milk  of  a  "neat  or  hind  all  of  one  color,"  and  a 
litany,  paternoster,  and  incantation  of  strange  words  are  to 
be  repeated  nine  times  each.^    A  great  deal  of  superstitious 
use  is  made  of  such  Christian  symbols,  names,  and  forms  of 
prayer  as  the  sign  of  the  cross,  the  names  of  the  four  evan- 


*J.  F.  Payne,  English  Medicine 

'111,47. 

in   Anglo-Saxon    Times,    1904,    p. 

"I,  86. 

15s. 

M,  68. 

'  Book  I,   cap.  87. 

"  II,  66. 

M,4S. 

"1,45. 

*I,  85. 

y22 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE      chap 


A  super- 
stitious 
com- 
pound. 


Summary. 


gelists,  and  masses,  psalms,  and  exorcisms.  Fear  of  witch- 
craft and  enchantment  is  manifested,  and  the  ills  both  of 
man  and  beast  are  frequently  attributed  to  evil  spirits.  "A 
drink  for  a  fiend-sick  man"  is  on  one  occasion  "to  be  drunk 
out  of  a  church  bell,"  with  the  accompaniment  of  much  ad- 
ditional ecclesiastical  hocus-pocus.^  "If  a  horse  is  elf-shot, 
then  take  the  knife  of  which  the  haft  is  horn  of  a  fallow  ox, 
and  on  which  are  three  brass  nails.  Then  write  upon  the 
horse's  forehead  Christ's  mark,  and  on  each  of  the  limbs 
which  thou  may  feel  at.  Then  take  the  left  ear ;  prick  a  hole 
in  it  in  silence.  This  thou  shalt  do ;  then  take  a  yerd,  strike 
the  horse  on  the  back,  then  it  will  be  whole.  And  write  upon 
the  horn  of  the  knife  these  words,  Benedicite  omnia  opera 
domini  dominum.  Be  the  elf  what  it  may,  this  is  mighty  for 
him  to  amends."  ^ 

Neither  Bald  and  Cild  nor  their  continuator  shared 
Pliny's  prejudice  against  compound  medicines.  In  the  third 
book  by  the  continuator  is  described  "a.  salve  against  the  elfin 
race  and  nocturnal  visitors,  and  for  women  with  whom  the 
devil  hath  carnal  commerce."  One  takes  the  ewe  hop  plant, 
wormwood,  bishopwort,  lupin,  ashthroat,  henbane,  hare- 
wort,  viper's  bugloss,  heatherberry  plants,  cropleek,  garlic, 
grains  of  hedgerife,  githrife,  and  fennel.  These  herbs  are 
put  in  a  vessel  and  placed  beneath  the  altar  where  nine  masses 
are  sung  over  them.  They  are  then  boiled  in  butter  and  mut- 
ton fat ;  much  holy  salt  is  added ;  the  salve  is  strained  through 
a  cloth;  and  what  remains  of  the  worts  is  thrown  into  run- 
ning water.  The  patient's  forehead  and  eyes  are  to  be 
smeared  with  this  ointment  and  he  is  further  to  be  censed 
with  incense  and  signed  often  with  the  sign  of  the  cross.^ 

The  "modern"  character  of  Bald's  and  Cild's  book  can- 
not be  said  to  have  produced  any  diminution  of  superstition 
as  against  the  writings  of  antiquity.  But  we  do  find  native 
herbs  introduced,  also  popular  medicine,  and  probably  a  con- 
siderable amount  of  Teutonic  and  perhaps  also  Celtic  folk- 


'  1, 63. 
'11,65 


III,  61. 


XXXI       MEDICINE  TO  THE  TWELFTH  CENTURY        723 

lore,  which,  however,  has  been  more  or  less  Christianized. 
Indeed  the  connection  between  medicine  and  religion  is  re- 
markably close. 

The  medicine  of  this  period  may  be  further  illustrated  Cauteriza- 
by  two  Latin  manuscripts  of  the  eleventh  century  in  the  *°"* 
Sloane  collection  of  the  British  Museum.^  One  contains  a 
brief  treatise  which  illustrates  the  common  tendency  at  that 
time  to  employ  cauterization  not  only  for  surgical  purposes 
in  connection  with  wounds,  but  as  a  medical  means  of  giving 
relief  to  internal  diseases  and  trivial  complaints  with  which 
cauterization  could  have  no  connection.  That  the  practice 
was  very  largely  a  superstition  is  further  evident  from  the 
fact  that  one  part  of  the  body  often  was  cauterized  for  a 
complaint  in  another  or  opposite  portion  or  member.  In 
the  present  example,  under  the  alluring  names  of  Apollonius 
and  Galen  as  professed  authors,^  are  presented  a  series  of 
human  figures  showing  where  the  cautery  should  be  applied. 
These  pictures  of  naked  patients  marked  all  over  their  anat- 
omy with  spots  where  the  red-hot  iron  should  be  applied,  or 
submitting  with  smiling  or  wry  faces  to  its  actual  adminis- 
tration in  the  most  tender  places,  are  both  amusing  and, 
when  we  reflect  that  this  useless  pain  was  actually  repeatedly 
inflicted  through  long  centuries,  pathetic.^ 

In  a  general  and  much  longer  work  on  diseases  and  their   Treatment 
remedies  which  follows  in  the  same  manuscript  and  which  is    ^onfacs. 
professedly  compiled  from  Hippocrates,  Galen,  and  Apollo- 
nius, the  treatment  prescribed  for  demoniacs,^  who,  it  states, 
are  in  Greek  called  epilemptici  (epileptics),  includes  among 

^  Sloane  475    (olim  Fr.  Bernard  et  Galieni."     James,  Western  MSS 

116),    231    leaves,    including    two  in     Trinity     College,     Cambridge, 

codices,  one  of  the   12th  century.  III,  26-8,  describes  fifty  drawings, 

which    is    also    medical    but    with  chiefly   of   surgical   operations,   in 

which  we  shall  not  deal  at  pres-  MS  1044,  early  13th  century.     By 

ent,  and  the  other  of  the  loth  or  that   date   cauterization    seems    to 

nth  century  and  written  in  differ-  have  become  less  common, 
ent  hands.     The  MS  is  mutilated  ^  Professor  T.  W.  Todd  thinks 

both    at    the    beginning    and    the  that    I    am    too    severe    upon    the 

close.  practice  of  cauterization,  and  that 

Sloane  2839,    nth  century,    112  it  may  sometimes  have  served' as 

leaves.  a     counter-irritant     like     mustard 

'Sloane  2839,  fols.  iv-3,  "Liber  plasters  and  the  blister. 
Cirrur^ium    Cauterium    Apollonii         *  Sloane,  2839,  fols.  79V'8ov. 


724 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Incanta- 
tions and 
charac- 
ters. 


In  a 
twelfth 
century 
manu- 
script. 


Other  things  vaporization  between  the  shoulder  blades  with 
various  mixtures,  scarification  and  bleeding,  application  of 
leeches  to  the  "stomach  where  you  ought  not  to  operate  with 
iron,"  ^  shaving  and  "imbrocating"  ^  the  scalp,  and  anoint- 
ing the  hands  and  feet  with  oil.  Both  our  manuscripts  con- 
tain recipes  for  expelling  or  routing  demons.^  For  this 
purpose  such  substances  are  employed  as  the  stone  gagates 
and  holy  water,  and  elsewhere  the  usual  confidence  is  re- 
posed in  the  virtues  of  herbs  and  such  parts  of  animals  as 
the  liver  of  a  vulture. 

In  one  of  the  manuscripts  is  a  treatise  in  which  much 
use  is  made  of  incantations  and  characters.  There  are 
prayers  to  "Lord  Jesus  and  Holy  Mary"  to  heal  the  sick, 
while  characters,  sometimes  engraved  upon  lead  plates,  are 
employed  not  only  for  medical  purposes,  but  to  prevent 
women  from  conceiving,  to  make  fruit  trees  bear  well,  and 
against  enemies.*  Later  on  in  the  manuscript  instructions 
for  plucking  a  medicinal  herb  include  facing  east  and  re- 
citing a  paternoster.^ 

The  twelfth  century  portion  of  this  same  manuscript  con- 
sists mainly  of  a  long  medical  medley  with  no  definitely 
marked  beginning  or  ending  but  apparently  originally  in  five 
books, ^  Towards  its  close  occur  a  number  of  incantations 
and  characters  quite  in  the  style  of  Marcellus  Empiricus.'^ 
Indeed,  "a  marvelous  charm"  for  toothache  is  an  exact  copy 
of  his  instructions  to  repeat  seven  times  in  a  waning  moon 


^  "Ad  stomachum  ubi  f erro 
operare  non  oportes  sansugias 
apponas." 

^  Iinbrocare.  I  have  not  dis- 
covered exactly  what  it  means. 

'  Sloane  475,  f  ol.  224r ;  Sloane 
2839,   fol.  97r. 

*  Sloane  475,  fol.  133,  et  seq. 

"  Sloane  475,  fol.  224V. 

'  Sloane  475,  fols.  1-124.  At  fol. 
36r  occurs  the  familiar  pseudo- 
letter  of  Hippocrates  to  Antig- 
onus;  at  fols.  8v-ior  is  a  pas- 
sage almost  identical  with  that 
at  the  close  of  the  Dc  medicamen- 
tis  of  Marcellus,  1889,  p.  382;  an 


incantation  from  Marcellus  is  re- 
peated at  fol.  117V.  At  fol.  37r  we 
read  "Explicit  Liber  II,  Incipit 
Liber  Tertius  ad  ventris  rigidita- 
tem" ;  at  fol.  6or,  "Explicit  liber 
tertius.  Incipit  Liber  IIII";  at 
fol.  85r,  "Incipit  Liber  V." 

'See  fol.  nor,  "Cros,  oros, 
comigeos,  delig(c)ros,  falicros, 
spolicros,  splena  mihi";  and  fol. 
ii4r,  "Opas,  nolipas,  opium,  no- 
limpium."  Those  who  delight  in 
ciphers  will  perhaps  detect  in  the 
latter  incantation  a  hidden  allu- 
sion to  opiates. 


XXXI        MEDICINE  TO  THE  TWELFTH  CENTURY        725 

on  Tuesday  or  Thursday  an  incantation  beginning,  "Aridam, 
margidam,  sturgidam."  ^  To  make  all  his  enemies  fear  him 
a  man  should  gather  the  herb  verbena  on  a  Thursday,  re- 
peating seven  times  a  formula  in  which  the  plant  is  person- 
ally addressed  and  the  desire  expressed  to  triumph  over  all 
foes  as  the  verbena  conquers  winds  and  rains,  hail  and 
storms.^  If  here  the  influence  of  pagan  religion  is  still 
present,  many  of  the  incantations  are  in  Christian  form  and 
expressed  in  the  name  of  God  or  the  Father.  To  find  a  thief 
characters  are  employed  together  with  the  incantation, 
"Abraham  bound,  Isaac  held,  Jacob  brought  back  to  the 
house."  ^  A  charm  against  fever  opens,  "Christ  was  born 
and  suffered;  Christ  Jesus  rose  from  the  dead  and  ascended 
unto  heaven ;  Christ  will  come  at  the  day  of  judgment.  Christ 
says,  According  to  your  faith  it  shall  be  done."  Then  the 
sign  of  the  cross  is  employed  and  "sacred  words,"  which 
seem,  however,  to  include  not  only  Matthew,  Mark,  Luke, 
and  John,  but  Maximianus,  Dionysius,  John,  Serapion,  and 
Constantinus.  As  we  have  to  do  with  a  twelfth  century 
manuscript  the  last  two  names  might  be  presumed  to  have 
reference  to  the  medical  writers  of  the  eleventh  century,  but 
another  manuscript  which  contains  a  similar  incantation 
states  that  they  are  the  names  of  the  seven  sleepers.'*  Our 
charm  then  continues  "In  the  name  of  Christ"  and  with  a 
prayer  to  God  to  free  from  sickness  anyone  who  "bears 
this  writing  in  Thy  name."  ^ 

In  the  same  work  occurs  the  earliest  instance  of  which   Magic 
I  am  aware  of  the  magical  "experiment"  with  a  split  rod   ^^tifazel 
and  an  incantation,  to  which  we  shall  hear  William  of  Au-   rod. 
vergne,  Albertus  Magnus,  John  of  St.  Amand,  and  Roger 
Bacon  refer  in  the  thirteenth  century.    A  rod  of  four  cubits 
length  is  to  be  cut  with  repetition  of  the  Lord's  Prayer. 
It  is  to  be  split,  and  the  two  halves  are  to  be  held  apart  at  the 

*  Fol.      ii7v;      see      Marcellus      sanctorum  germanorum  dormien- 
(1889),  p.  123,  cap.  12.  tium   que   sunt   hec,    Maximianus, 

*Fol.  iiir.  Malchus,    Martinianus,    Constan- 

*  Fol.  1 1 IV.  tinus,   Dionisius,   lohannes,   Sera- 
■*  BN    nouv.    acq.    229,    fol.    7v      pion." 

(once    p.    246),    "nomina    septem  *  Sloane  475,  fol.  I22v. 


726 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


More  in- 
cantations 
and  the 
virtues  of 
a  vulture. 


ends  by  two  men.  Then,  making  the  sign  of  the  cross,  one 
should  repeat  the  following  incantation,  "Ellum  sat  upon  ella 
and  held  a  green  rod  in  his  hand  and  said,  Rod  of  green 
reunite  again,"  ^  together  with  the  Lord's  Prayer  until  the 
two  split  halves  bend  together  in  the  middle.  One  then 
seizes  them  in  one's  fist  at  the  junction  point,  cuts  off  the 
rest  of  the  rods,  and  makes  magic  use  of  the  section  re- 
maining in  one's  grasp.  ^ 

Another  manuscript  of  the  twelfth  century  ^  contains 
many  similar  charms,  incantations,  prayers,  and  charactejs 
for  healing  purposes.  One  formula  employed  is,  "Christ 
conquers,  Christ  reigns,  Christ  commands."  In  cases  of 
miscarriage  a  drink  of  verbena  is  recommended  and  repe- 
tition of  the  following  incantation  with  three  Paternosters, 
"Saisa,  laisa,  relaisa,  because  so  Saint  Mary  did  when  she 
bore  the  Son  of  God."  Presently  a  paragraph  opens  with 
the  assertion  that  the  human  race  does  not  know  how  great 
virtue  the  vulture  *  possesses  and  how  much  it  improves 
health.  But  certain  ceremonial  directions  must  be  observed 
in  making  use  of  it.  The  bird  should  be  killed  in  the  very 
hour  in  which  it  is  caught  and  with  a  sharp  reed  rather  than 
a  sword.  Before  beheading  it,  one  should  utter  an  incan- 
tation containing  such  names  as  Adonai  and  Abraam.  Vari- 
ous healing  virtues  appertain  to  the  different  parts  of  its 
carcass,  although  here  again  there  are  instructions  to  be 
observed.  The  bones  of  its  head  should  be  bound  in  hyena 
skin;  its  eyes  should  be  suspended  from  the  neck  in  wolf's 
skin.  Binding  its  wings  on  the'left  foot  of  a  woman  strug- 
gling in  child-birth  produces  a  quick  delivery.  One  who 
wears  its  tongue  will  receive  the  adoration  of  all  his  ene- 
mies; if  one  has  its  heart  bound  in  the  skin  of  a  lion  or 
wolf,  all  demons  will  avoid  one  and  robbers  will  only  wor- 
ship one.    Its  gall  taken  in  quite  a  mixture  cures  epileptics 

^^"Ellum  super  ellam  sedebat  et         'Egerton82i,  I2th  century,  fols. 
virgam   viridem   in  manu  tenebat      S2y-6ov. 
et  dicebat,  Virgam  viridis  reuni- 
tere  in  simul." 

*Sloane  475,   fol.   ii2v.     Unin- 
telligible letters  follow. 


*  Ibid.,  fol.  53V,  vultilis,  which 
I  assume  should  be  vulturis  rather 
than  vituli,  or  bull-calf. 


XXXI       MEDICINE  TO  THE  TWELFTH  CENTURY        727 


and  lunatics;  its  lung  in  another  compound  cures  fevers; 
and  so  on. 

There  follow  Sortes  sanctorum,  introduced  by  a  page 
and  a  half  of  prayers  of  this  tenor,  "In  the  name  of  our  Lord 
Jesus  Christ,  we  ask  Father  and  Son  and  Holy  Ghost,  Three 
and  One ;  we  ask  Saint  Mary,  the  mother  of  our  Lord  Jesus 
Christ;  we  ask  the  nine  orders  of  angels;  we  ask  the  whole 
chorus  of  patriarchs;  we  ask  the  whole  chorus  of  apostles, 
martyrs,  confessors,  and  virgins,  and  the  whole  chorus  of 
God's  faithful  that  they  deign  to  reveal  to  us  these  lots 
which  we  seek,  and  that  no  seduction  of  the  devil  may  de- 
ceive us."  The  treatise  closes,  "These  are  the  lots  of  the 
saints  which  never  fail;  so  ask  God  and  obtain  what  you 
desire." 

The  next  items  in  the  manuscript  are  some  cases  of  su- 
perstitious veterinary  practice,  with  such  pious  incantations 
as  "May  God  who  saved  the  thief  on  the  cross  save  this 
beast!"  ^  and  with  instructions  concerning  the  religious  in- 
vocations and  written  characters  to  be  employed  in  blessing 
the  food  and  salt  to  be  given  to  domestic  animals  in  order 
to  keep  them  in  good  health.  Characters  are  also  mentioned 
which  will  prevent  the  blood  of  a  pig  from  flowing  when  it 
is  slaughtered,  provided  they  are  bound  upon  the  breast  or 
are  written  on  the  knife  with  which  the  pig  is  to  be  stuck. ^ 
Holy  water  and  bread  that  has  been  blessed  are  used  for 
medical  purposes  and  instructions  are  given  on  what  days 
medicinal  herbs  should  be  gathered.  The  prayers  em- 
ployed are  usually  put  in  Christian  form,  but  one  for  the 
cure  of  toothache  has  slipped  by  at  least  partially  uncensored. 
It  opens  with  the  words  "O  lady  Moon,  free  me.  .  .  ."  ^ 

If  we  turn  from  medical  manuscripts  of  the  eleventh 
and  twelfth  centuries  in  the  British  Museum  to  those  of  the 
Bibliotheque  Nationale,  we  find  the  same  occurrence  of  su- 
perstitious passages.  In  an  eleventh  century  codex  which  con- 
tains parts  of  the  medical  work  of  Celsus  and  the  De  dina- 


Lots  of 
the  saints. 


Super- 
stitious 
veterinary 
and 

medical 
practice. 


Two 
Paris 
manu- 
scripts. 


*  Egerton  821,  fol.  57. 
*Ibid.,  fol.  58V. 


'Ibid.,  fol.  6or. 


728  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

midis  of  Galen  are  also  found  prayers  to  God  for  the  medic- 
inal aid  of  the  angel  Raphael  against  the  treacherous  at- 
tacks of  the  demons,  a  work  on  the  virtues  of  stones  which 
has  much  to  say  of  their  marvelous  properties,  and  figures 
and  text  concerning  the  twelve  signs  of  the  zodiac  and  twelve 
winds.^  Much  more  superstitious,  however,  is  an  anony- 
mous treatise  occupying  the  first  ten  leaves  of  a  twelfth  cen- 
tury manuscript  ^  which  is  apparently  of  German  origin 
from  the  number  of  German  words  and  phrases  introduced 
near  its  close.  This  treatise  is  followed  in  the  manuscript 
by  the  works  of  Notker,  Hermann  the  Lame,  and  others  on 
computus  and  the  astrolabe. 
Blood-  After  discussing  the  effect  of  food  upon  health,  listing 

etting.  potions  of  herbs  to  be  drunk  in  each  month  of  the  year,^ 
treating  of  the  veins  and  of  the  four  winds,  four  seasons, 
and  four  humors,  and  the  relations  existing  between  the  two 
last-named,  the  author  enumerates  the  many  advantages  of 
blood-letting  in  a  long  passage  which  is  worth  quoting  in 
part.  "It  contains  the  beginning  of  health,  it  makes  the 
mind  sincere,  it  aids  the  memory,  it  purges  the  brain,  it  re- 
forms the  bladder,  it  warms  the  marrow,  it  opens  the  hear- 
ing, it  checks  tears,  it  removes  nausea,  it  benefits  the  stomach, 
it  invites  digestion,  it  evokes  the  voice,  it  builds  up  the 
sense,  it  moves  the  bowels,  it  enriches  sleep,  it  removes 
anxiety,  it  nourishes  good  health  .  .  . "  :  and  so  on.  The 
operation  of  bleeding  should  not  be  performed  on  the  tenth, 
fifteenth,  twenty-fifth,  or  thirtieth  day  of  the  moon,  nor 
should  a  potion  be  taken  then.  The  Egyptian  days  and  dog- 
days  are  to  be  similarly  observed.  The  hours  of  the  day 
when  each  humor  predominates  are  then  given. 

*BN    7028,    nth    century,    fols.  *BN    nouv.    acq.    229,    fol.    2r. 

136V,  140-3,  I54r,  and  i56r.  March  is  treated  first  and  Febru- 

^  BN   nouv.   acq.   229,    12th  can-  ary   last,    while   a   similar   discus- 

tury,    fols.    ir-ior    (once   pp.   233-  sion  later  in  the  same  work  (fols. 

51),  opening,  "Rationem  observa-  8r-9r,      Quid     unoquoque     mense 

tionis     vestre     pictati     secundum  utendum  quidve  vitandum  sit)  be- 

precepta    doctorum    medicinalium  gins  with  January, 
ut  potui.  .  .  ." 


XXXI       MEDICINE  TO  THE  TWELFTH  CENTURY        729 


There  then  is  introduced  rather  abruptly  an  account  of 
the  medicinal  virtues  of  the  vulture  almost  identical  with 
that  in  the  British  Museum  manuscript.  Once  again,  too, 
herbs  are  to  be  plucked  with  repetition  of  the  Lord's  Prayer.^ 
The  use  of  characters  to  prevent  a  slaughtered  pig  from 
bleeding  is  introduced  somewhat  otherwise  than  in  the  other 
manuscript.  Having  first  recommended  as  a  cure  for  human 
sufferers  from  flux  of  blood  the  binding  about  the  abdomen 
of  a  parchment  inscribed  with  the  characters  in  question,  the 
author  adds,  "And  if  you  don't  believe  it,  write  them  on  a 
knife  and  kill  a  pig  with  it,  and  you  will  see  no  blood  flow 
from  the  wound."  ^ 

Considerable  medicinal  use  is  made  of  blood  in  this 
treatise.  For  cataract  is  recommended  instilling  in  the  eye 
the  blood  which  flows  from  a  certain  worm  {oudehsani?) 
when  "you  cut  it  in  two  near  the  tail."  ^  To  break  the  stone 
one  employs  goat's  blood  caught  in  a  glass  vessel  in  a  waning 
moon  and  dried  eight  days  in  the  sun  together  with  the 
pulverized  skin  of  a  rabbit  caught  in  a  waning  moon  and 
roasted  over  marble.  These  are  to  be  mixed  in  wine  and 
given  in  the  name  of  the  Lord  to  the  patient  to  drink  while 
he  is  in  the  bath.*  Another  remedy  consists  of  three  drops 
of  the  milk  of  a  woman  nursing  a  male  child  given  in  a  raw 
tgg  to  the  patient  without  his  knowledge.^ 

The  work  abounds  in  characters  and  in  incantations 
which  consist  either  of  seemingly  meaningless  words  or  of 
Biblical  phrases  and  allusions.  These  are  very  much  like 
those  in  the  manuscripts  already  considered  and  are  often 
accompanied  by  elaborate  procedure.  For  example,  the 
prayer,  "O  Lord,  spare  your  servant  N.,  so  that  chastised 
with  deserved  stripes  he  may  rest  in  your  mercy,"  is  to  be 
written  on  five  holy  wafers  which  are  then  to  be  placed 
on  the  five  wounds  of  a  figure  of  Christ  on  a  crucifix.  The 
patient  is  to  approach  barefoot,  eat  the  wafers,  and  say: 


Resem- 
blances to 
Egerton 
821. 


Virtues 
of  blood. 


Pious  in- 
cantations 
and  magi- 
cal pro- 
cedure. 


^  BN  nouv.  acq.  229,  f  ol.  7 

*  Fols.  4V-Sr. 

^Fol.  6r. 

"  Fol.  7r. 

"  Fol.  4v. 

730 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


More 
super- 
stitious 
veterinary 
practice. 


"Almighty  God,  who  saved  all  the  human  race,  save  me  and 
free  me  from  these  fevers  and  from  all  my  languors.  By 
God  Christ  was  announced,  and  Christ  was  born,  and  Christ 
was  wrapped  in  swaddling  clothes,  and  Christ  was  placed  in 
a  manger,  and  Christ  was  circumcised,  and  Christ  was 
adored  by  the  Magi,  and  Christ  was  baptized,  and  Christ 
was  tempted,  and  Christ  was  betrayed,  and  Christ  was 
flogged,  and  Christ  was  spat  upon,  and  Christ  was  given 
gall  and  vinegar  to  drink,  and  Christ  was  pierced  with  a 
lance,  and  Christ  was  crucified,  and  Christ  died,  and  Christ 
was  buried,  and  Christ  rose  again,  and  Christ  ascended  unto 
heaven.  In  the  name  of  the  Father  and  of  the  Son  and  of 
the  Holy  Ghost,  Jesus,  rising  from  the  synagogue,  entered 
the  house  of  Simon.  Moreover,  Simon's  daughter  was  sick 
with  a  high  fever.  And  they  entreated  Him  on  her  behalf. 
And  standing  over  her  He  commanded  the  fever  and  it  de- 
parted." ^  To  cure  epilepsy  an  interesting  combination  of 
scriptural  incantation  and  rather  unusual  magic  procedure  is 
recommended.  Before  the  attack  comes  on,  the  words  of  the 
Gospel  of  Matthew,  "J^^us  was  led  by  the  spirit  into  the 
desert;  and  angels  came  and  ministered  unto  Him,"  are  to 
be  written  on  a  wooden  tablet  with  some  black  substance 
which  will  wash  off  readily.  Then,  when  the  fit  comes  on, 
this  writing  is  to  be  washed  off  into  a  vessel  with  still  water 
and  given  to  the  patient  to  drink  in  the  name  of  Father,  Son, 
and  Holy  Ghost.  "H  you  do  this  three  times,  God  helping 
the  patient  will  be  cured."  ^ 

Our  manuscript  further  resembles  Egerton  821  of  the 
British  Museum  in  containing  remedies  for  beast  as  well  as 
man.  Ha  horse  suffers  from  over-eating,  one  should  learn 
his  name  and  procure  some  hazel  rods.  Then  one  is  to 
whisper  in  his  right  ear  an  incantation  consisting  of  out- 
landish words  accompanied  by  the  Lord's  Prayer,  and  is 
to  bind  his  thighs  and  feet  with  the  rods.  This  ceremony, 
too,  is  to  be  repeated  thrice.^ 


'Fol.  7v. 


"Fol.  gv. 


XXXI        MEDICINE  TO  THE  TWELFTH  CENTURY        731 

We  now  come  to  the  consideration  of  treatises  sup-  The 
posed  to  have  been  produced  by  the  school  of  medicine  at  |aierno 
Salerno.  But  not  only  are  the  origins  of  the  so-called 
School  of  Salerno  "veiled  in  impenetrable  obscurity,"  ^ 
much  of  its  later  history  is  scarcely  less  uncertain,  and  it  is 
no  easy  matter  to  say  what  men  and  what  writings  may 
be  properly  called  Salernitan,  or  when  they  lived  or  were 
composed.  The  manuscripts  of  Salernitan  writings  seem 
to  have  been  found  more  frequently  north  of  the  Alps  than 
in  Italian  libraries.  It  would  perhaps  be  carrying  scepticism 
too  far  to  doubt  if  medicine  developed  much  earlier  or  more 
rapidly  at  Salerno  than  elsewhere,  since  it  seems  certain 
that  the  town  was  famous  for  its  physicians  at  an  early  date, 
and  that  we  have  medical  writings  of  Salemitans  produced 
in  the  early  eleventh  century.  But  one  is  inclined  to  view 
with  some  scepticism  the  assumption  of  historians  of  medi- 
cine^ that  the  word  Salernitan  represents  a  separate  body 
of  doctrine,  or  of  method  in  practice,  which  may  be  sharply 
distinguished  from  Arabic  medicine  or  from  later  medieval 
medicine  as  affected  by  Arabic  influence.  Rather  the 
medical  literature  and  practice  of  Salerno  is  an  integral  and 

^What  is  known  of  the  School  so  that  the  history  of  the  school 
of  Salerno  has  already  been  and  the  texts  in  the  earlier 
briefly  indicated  in  English  by  H.  volumes  have  to  be  supplemented 
Rashdall,  Universities  of  Europe  and  corrected  by  the  fuller  ver- 
m  the  Middle  Ages,  1895,  I,  75-86,  sions  and  dissertations  in  the  later 
and  T.  Puschmann,  History  of  volumes.  It  is  too  bad  that  all 
Medical  Education,  English  trans-  the  materials  could  not  have  been 
lation,  London,  i8t)i,  pp.  197-21 1.  collected  and  more  systematically 
The  standard  work  on  the  subject  arranged  and  collated  before  pub- 
is Salvatore  De  Renzi,  Collcctio  lication.  Also  some  of  the  texts 
Salernitana,  in  Italian  with  Latin  printed  have  but  the  remotest 
texts,  published  at  Naples  in  five  connection  with  Salerno,  while 
volurnes  from  1852  to  1859.  It  others  have  nothing  to  do  with 
contains  a  history  of  the  School  medicine. 

of   Salerno  by  Renzi  and  various  To  this   collection  of   materials 

texts  brought  to  light  and  disser-  some  further  additions  have  been 

tations  discussing  them  by  Renzi,  made    by     P.     Giacosa,    Magistri 

Daremberg,  Henschel,  and  others.  Salernitani   nondum   editi,   Turin, 

Unfortunately    this    publication  1901. 

proceeded     by     the     unsystematic  For  further  bibliography  see  in 

piecemeal       and       hand-to-mouth  the  recent  reprint  of  Harrington's 

method,   and   new   texts   and  dis-  English    translation,    The    School 

coveries  were  brought  to  the  edi-  of  Salerno  (1920),  pp.  50-52. 

tor's  attention  during  the  process,  ^Notably  Daremberg. 


732 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Was 

Salernitan 
medicine 
free  from 
super- 
stition ? 


scarcely  distinguishable  part  of  medieval  medicine  as  a 
whole.  Many  Salernitan  treatises  themselves  belong  to  the 
later  medieval  period,  and  very  few  of  them  can  be  shown 
to  antedate  Constantinus  Africanus,  whose  translations 
seem  to  mark  the  beginning  of  Arabic  influence.  And  on 
the  other  hand  there  are  equally  early  medieval  medical 
treatises,  such  as  those  we  have  hitherto  been  considering, 
which  are  not  Salernitan  and  yet  show  no  sign  of  Arabic 
influence.  Thus  the  word  Salernitan  cannot  accurately  be 
identified  with  a  first  period  of  medieval  Latin  medicine 
based  upon  early  or  Neo-Latin  translations  of  Greek  med- 
ical authors  and  upon  independent  medical  practice.  Such 
activity  was  not  confined  to  Salerno.  But  if  we  so  em- 
ploy the  word  Salernitan  for  a  moment,  there  seems 
no  reason  for  thinking  that  such  a  development  would  be 
very  different  from  the  Arabic  and  Byzantine  continua- 
tions of  Greek  medicine.  A  place  so  open  to  Saracen  and 
Byzantine  influence  as  the  coast  of  southern  Italy  is  hardly 
the  spot  where  we  should  look  for  a  totally  distinct  medical 
development,  and  the  influence  of  Celtic  and  Teutonic  folk- 
lore upon  medical  practice  would  presumably  be  more 
felt  north  of  the  Alps.  And  it  is  to  Salerno  that  Con- 
stantinus Africanus,  the  earliest  known  importer  of  Arabic 
medicine,  comes. 

The  notion,  too,  that  the  Salernitan  or  early  medieval 
Latin  medical  practice  was  sound  and  straightforward  and 
sensible  and  free  from  the  superstition  with  which  the 
holders  of  this  opinion  represent  Arabic  and  later  medieval 
medicine  as  overburdened,  is  also  probably  illusory.  We 
have  already  seen  evidence  of  rather  extreme  superstition  in 
early  medieval  Latin  medicine  which  shows  no  trace  of 
Arabic  influence,  and  the  medical  practitioners  of  Salerno 
are  sometimes  represented  in  the  sources  as  empiricists  or 
old-wives.  The  place  was  peculiarly  noted  for  its  female 
practitioners,  of  whom  more  anon;  and  one  of  the  earliest 
mentions  of  a  physician  of  Salerno  is  the  account  in  Richer's 


XXXI       MEDICINE  TO  THE  TWELFTH  CENTURY        733 

chronicle  ^  of  the  mutual  poisoning  of  two  rival  physicians 
in  946  A.  D.  Here  the  Salernitan  is  described  as  lacking 
in  Latin  book-knowledge  and  skilful  from  natural  talent  and 
much  experience.  He  was  the  queen's  favorite  physician, 
but  was  worsted  by  another  royal  physician,  Bishop  Derol- 
dus,  in  a  debate  which  the  king,  Louis  IV,  instituted  in 
order  to  find  out  "which  of  them  knew  more  of  the  natures 
of  things."  The  defeated  Salernitan  then  "prepared  sor- 
cery" and  tried  to  poison  the  bishop,  who  cured  himself  with 
theriac  and  secretly  poisoned  his  rival  in  turn.  The  Salerni- 
tan was  then  reduced  to  the  humiliating  position  of  being 
forced  to  beseech  the  prelate  to  cure  him,  but  in  his  case  the 
theriac  only  drove  the  poison  into  his  foot,  which  had  to  be 
amputated  by  a  surgeon.  This  tale,  be  it  true  or  not,  suggests 
that  there  were  good  Latin  physicians  and  surgeons  outside 
of  Salerno  at  an  early  date  as  well  as  that  Salernitan  medi- 
cine was  far  from  being  free  from  magic  and  empiricism. 

It  is  fairer,  however,  to  judge  Salerno  by  its  own  best  The 
written  productions  rather  than  by  the  stories  of  perhaps  o/petro- 
jealous  northerners,  and  we  may  note  Payne's  comparison   cellus. 
of  the  Practica  of  Petrocellus,^  written  probably  in  the  early 
eleventh  century,  with  the  earlier  Leech-Book  of  Bald  and 
Gild.    Selected  recipes,  it  may  first  be  said,  were  translated 
from  the  Practica  into  Anglo-Saxon.^     Dr.  Payne  was  im- 
pressed by  "the  complete  freedom  of  the  former  from  the 
magic  and  superstition  which  tainted  the  Anglo-Saxon  and 

^11,  59  (MG.  SS.  Ill,  600).  _  '  Petrocellus,  mpi  SiSa^eoiv,  Eine 
*  S.  de  Renzi,  Collectio  Salerni-  Sammlung  von  Rezepten  in 
tayia,  IV,  185,  Practica  Petroncelli,  englischer  Sprache  aus  dem  11-12 
perhaps  from  an  imperfect  copy ;  Jahrhundert.  Nach  einer  Hand- 
le, 315,  Sulle  opere  che  vanno  schrift  des  Britischen  Museums 
sotto  il  nome  di  Petroncello.  herausg.  v.  M.  Loweneck  (in 
Heeg,  Pseudodemocrit.  Stiidien,  in  Anglo-Saxon  and  Latin),  1896,  pp. 
Ahhandl.  d.  Berl.  Akad.  (1913),  p.  viii,  57,  Heft  12  in  Erlanger 
42,  shows  that  what  Renzi  printed  Bcitr'dge  s.  cnglischen  Philologie. 
tentatively  as  the  table  of  con-  The  treatise  perhaps  also  contains 
tents  and  an  extract  from  the  selections  from  the  Passionarius 
third  book  of  the  Practica,  is  not  of  Gariopontus.  It  had  been  pub- 
by  Petrocellus  but  by  the  Pseudo-  lished  before  in  Cockayne,  Anglo- 
Democritus,  and  that  one  MS  of  Saxon  Leechdoms,  1864-1866,  III, 
it  dates  from  the  ninth  or  tenth  82-143. 
century. 


734  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

all  other  European  medicine  of  the  time."  Payne  noted 
that  the  compounds  of  Petrocellus  contained  fewer  ingredi- 
ents, and  regarded  the  Salernitan  selection  of  drugs  as  "more 
intelhgent."  The  Salernitan  formulae  are  "clear,  simple, 
and  written  on  a  uniform  system  which  implies  traditional 
skill  and  culture."  ^  "The  pharmacy  is  generally  very 
simple ;  and,  as  might  be  expected,  there  is  an  entire  absence 
of  charms  and  superstitious  rites."  ^  Such  simplicity,  how- 
ever, is  at  best  a  negative  sort  of  virtue;  and  we  wonder 
if  this  early  specimen  of  the  School  of  Salerno  is  free  from 
elaborate  superstition  for  the  very  reason  that  the  work  is 
simple  and  elementary.  The  less  medicine,  the  less  super- 
stition perhaps.  Moreover,  superstition  is  not  quite  absent, 
since  Payne  himself  quotes  the  following  recipe :  "For  those 
who  cannot  see  from  sunrise  to  sunset.  .  .  .  This  is  the 
leechcraft  which  thereto  belongeth.  Take  a  kneecap  of  a 
buck  ^  and  roast  it,  and,  when  the  roast  sweats,  then  take 
the  sweat  and  therewith  smear  the  eyes,  and  after  that  let 
him  eat  the  same  roast ;  and  then  take  fresh  asses'  dung  and 
squeeze  it,  and  smear  the  eyes  therewith,  and  it  will  soon 
be  better  with  them."  ^ 
Its  Petrocellus  is  thought  to  have  used  Greek  writings  di- 

sources.  j-^c^iy  -without  the  intermediary  of  Arabic  versions.^  He 
says  in  the  introductory  letter  which  opens  the  Practica  that 
he  reduces  to  brief  form  in  the  Latin  language  those 
"authors  who  have  culled  the  dogmas  of  all  cases  from 
Greek  places."  ^  But  these  words  might  be  taken  to  indicate 
that  he  has  used  Greek  sources  only  indirectly,  while  the 
fact  that  the  person  to  whom  the  work  is  addressed  is  called 
"dearest  son"  and  "sweetest  son"  is  rather  in  the  style  of 
Arabian  and  Hebrew  medieval  writers.     He  goes  on  to 

*  Payne  (1904),  pp.  155-6.  *  Renzi,  IV,  190,  "Propterea  fili 

*  Ibid.,  p.  148.  karissime   cum    diuturno    tempore 
'The  Latin  text  reads,  "liver  of       de  medicina  tractassemus  omnipo- 

a  hedgehog,"  and  doubtless  either  tentis  Dei  nutu  admonitus  placuit 

would  be  equally  efficacious.  ut  ex  grecis   locis  sectantes  auc- 

*  Quoted    by    Payne    (1904),    p.  tores  omnium  causarum  dogmata 
152,  from  Cockayne's  translation.  in    breviloquium    latino    sermone 

•Renzi  (1852-9),  IV,  185.  conscriberemus." 


XXXI       MEDICINE  TO  THE  TWELFTH  CENTURY        735 

assure  this  person  that  everything  in  the  work  has  been 
tested  by  experience  and  that  nothing  should  be  added  to 
or  subtracted  from  it. 

This  introductory  epistle  also  embodies  an  account  of  Fourfold 
the  origin  of  medicine  which,  while  not  exactly  supersti-  medicine, 
tious,  is  quite  in  the  usual  naive  and  uncritical  style  so  often 
employed  by  both  ancient  and  medieval  writers  in  treating 
of  a  distant  past.  Apollo  and  his  son  Esculapius,  Asclepius 
and  "Ypocras"  are  named  as  the  four  founders  of  the  med- 
ical art.  Apollo  discovered  methoyca,  which  presumably 
means  methodism,  but  which  Petrocellus  proceeds  to  identify 
with  surgery.  Esculapius  invented  empirica,  which  is  de- 
scribed as  pharmacy  rather  than  empiricism,  although  per- 
haps the  distinction  is  slight.  Asclepius  founded  loyca, 
which  is  probably  meant  for  the  dogmatic  school.  Hip- 
pocrates' contribution  was  theoperica,  which  may  mean 
therapeutics  but  is  further  described  as  the  prognostication 
or  "prevision  of  diseases."  It  is  in  this  same  introductory 
epistle  that  Petrocellus  makes  the  division  of  the  brain  into 
three  cells  of  which  we  spoke  in  the  chapter  on  Arabic 
occult  science.  Besides  distinguishing  the  three  cells  as 
phantastic,  logical,  and  mnemonic,  he  adds  that  good  and 
evil  are  distinguished  in  the  middle  cell  and  that  the  soul  is 
in  the  posterior  one. 

In  the  Practica  proper  the  method  of  Petrocellus  is  to   Thera- 
1  1-  •  11       1  1       /-       1  11   •       peuticsof 

take  up  one  disease  at  a  time,  tell  what  the  Greeks  call  it,    Petro- 

and  briefly  describe  it,  sometimes  listing  its  symptoms  or 
causes,  but  devoting  most  of  his  space  to  such  methods  of 
curing  it  as  diet  and  bleeding,  simples  and  compounds.  I 
saw  no  instance  of  astrological  medicine  nor  of  resort  to 
amulets  and  incantations  in  the  version  published  by  Renzi 
from  a  twelfth  century  manuscript  at  Paris.  But  in  a 
fragment  of  the  work  from  a  Milan  manuscript  where 
twenty-six  lines  are  devoted  to  the  treatment  of  epilepsy  in- 
stead of  but  seven  as  in  the  other  text,^  one  is  advised  to  use 
antimony  in  the  holy  water  "which  the  Greeks  bless  on 
*  For  the  two  passages  on  epilepsy  see  Renzi,  IV,  pp.  235  and  293. 


cellus. 


736 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


The 

Regimen 
Salernita- 
num. 


Epiphany"  and  to  chant  the  Lord's  Prayer  three  times.  If 
this  passage  be  a  later  addition,  it  shows  that  Petrocellus 
was  less  inclined  to  superstitious  methods  than  others  and 
that  his  injunction  that  nothing  should  be  subtracted  from 
or  added  to  his  work  was  not  well  observed.  But  in  any 
case  it  illustrates  my  previous  point  that  the  more  medicine, 
the  more  superstition.  In  twenty-six  lines  on  epilepsy  one 
is  much  more  likely  to  find  something  superstitious  than  in 
seven.  Indeed,  the  treatment  of  epilepsy  was  so  generally 
superstitious  that  my  recollection  is  that  any  account  of  it 
of  any  considerable  length  which  I  have  seen  in  medieval 
writings  contained  some  superstition.  In  fact,  even  if  Petro- 
cellus wrote  the  longer  passage,  he  could  be  praised  for 
having  resorted  to  charms  and  formulae  only  in  the  case  of 
that  mysterious  disease. 

The  work  most  generally  known  as  a  characteristic  prod- 
uct of  the  School  of  Salerno  is  the  Latin  poem  ^  which  opens 
with  the  line,  "To  the  King  of  the  English  writes  the  whole 
School  of  Salerno."  "  This  poem  has  been  variously  entitled 
Schola  Salernitana,  Regimen  Salernitaniim,  and  Flos  niedi- 
cinae.  How  much  more  influential  and  widespread  it  was 
than  the  Practica  of  Petrocellus  may  be  seen  from  the  fact 
that  manuscripts  of  the  text  of  the  latter  are  rare,  though  the 
introductory  letter  is  more  common,  and  that  it  was  first  pub- 
lished by  Renzi  in  the  nineteenth  century,  whereas  about  one 
hundred  manuscripts  and  two  hundred  and  fifty  printed  edi- 
tions of  the  poem  have  been  found.  It  was  known  chiefly 
through  the  brief  version  of  362  verses,  upon  which  Arnald 
of  Villanova  commented  at  the  close  of  the  thirteenth  cen- 
tury, until  as  a  result  of  the  researches  of  Baudry  de  Balzac, 
Renzi,  and  Daremberg  the  number  of  lines  was  increased  to 
3526.    This  patchwork  from  many  manuscripts  can  scarcely 


^  Renzi,  I,  417-516,  Flos  medi- 
cinae,  a  text  of  2130  lines;  V,  i- 
104,  the  fuller  text  of  3526  lines ; 
113-72,  Notice  bibliographique ; 
385-40*5,  Notes  choisies  de  M. 
Baudry  de  Balzac  au  Flos  Sani- 


tatis. 

^  "Anglorum  Regi  scribit  Schola 
tota  Salerni."  Some  MSS  have 
Francorum  or  Roberto  instead  of 
Anglorum. 


XXXI       MEDICINE  TO  THE  TWELFTH  CENTURY        ni 

be  regarded  as  the  work  of  any  one  author,  time,  or  even 
school,  and  it  may  be  seriously  questioned  how  many  of  the 
verses  really  emanated  from  Salerno.  Certainly  it  is  not  free 
from  Arabic  influence,  since  it  cites  Alfraganus  as  well  as 
Ptolemy,^  Pliny  is  used  a  great  deal  for  the  virtues  of 
herbs.  Much  of  it  sounds  like  a  late  versification  of  com- 
monplaces for  mnemonic  purposes.  Sudhoff  has  recently 
pointed  out  that  it  was  not  generally  known  until  the  middle 
of  the  thirteenth  century,  before  which  time  Frederick  II, 
the  cultured  monarch,  and  Giles  de  Corbeil,  the  medical 
poet,  appear  unaware  of  its  existence.^ 

The  brief  version  of  the  poem  commented  upon  by  Itssuper- 
Arnald  of  Villanova  naturally  contains  only  one-tenth  of 
the  superstition  found  in  the  fuller  text  which  is  ten  times 
longer.  In  some  respects  this  brief  version  might  pass  as  a 
restrained,  though  quaint,  early  set  of  directions  how  to 
preserve  health,  to  which  later  writers  have  added  super- 
stitious recipes.  But  as  a  matter  of  fact  it  is  too  superstitious 
for  even  one  as  hospitable  to  theories  of  occult  influence  as 
Arnald,  who  rejects  as  false  and  worthless  ^  its  assertion 
that  the  months  of  April,  May,  and  September  are  lunar  and 
that  in  them  consequently  fall  the  days  upon  which  bleeding 
is  prohibited.  In  the  lines  upon  which  Arnald  comments 
marvelous  properties  are  mentioned  in  the  case  of  the  plant 
rue,  but  the  fuller  text  has  many  mentions  of  the  occult 
virtues  of  herbs,  stones,  and  animals.  Almost  at  a  glance 
we  read  that  the  urine  of  a  dog  or  the  blood  of  a  mouse 
cures  warts;  that  juice  of  betony  should  be  gathered  on 
the  eve  of  St.  John  the  Baptist,  that  rubbing  the  soles  of 
the  feet  cures  a  stiff  neck,  and  that  pearls  or  the  stone  found 
in  a  crab's  head  are  of  equal  virtue  for  heart  trouble.'*  And 
not  far  away  is  a  passage  ^  on  the  virtue  of  the  Agnus  Dei, 

*  Lines  2692-3.  *  Lines     1918-9,     1932-3,     1973-4, 

^  K.      SudhofF,      Zum    Regimen  1985,  in  Renzi's  first  text  of  2130 

SLUiitatis  Salernitanum,  in   Archiv  lines;    in   the    fuller  version   they 

/.  Gcsch.  d.  Medicin,  VII   (1914),  are    somewhat    more   widely    sep- 

3>)0,  and  IX  (1915-1916),  1-9.  arated:     lines     3053,     3130,     3227, 

'Arnald    de    Villanova,    Opera,  3267. 

Lyons,  1532,  fol.  147V.  "Lines  1845-55  or  2873-83. 


738  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

made  of  balsam,  pure  wax,  and  the  Chrism.  It  protects 
against  lightning  and  the  waves  of  the  sea,  aids  women  in 
child-birth,  saves  from  sudden  death,  and  in  short  from 
"every  kind  of  evil."  Astrology  is  by  no  means  omitted 
from  the  Regimen  Salernitanum;  in  fact  Balzac  seems  to 
have  taken  the  fact  that  verses  were  astrological  in  char- 
acter as  a  sign  that  they  belonged  in  the  Salernitan  collec- 
tion. 
The  Prac-  A  third  work  which  may  be  considered  as  an  example 

Archimat-  ^^  ^^^  medicine  of  Salerno  is  the  Practica  of  Archimatthaeus 
thaeus.  which  Renzi  placed  in  the  twelfth  century  and  conjectured 
to  be  the  work  of  Matthaeus  Platearius  the  Elder.^  One  or 
two  expressions,  however,  might  be  taken  as  indications  that 
the  writer  is  neither  of  early  date  nor  himself  a  Salernitan. 
He  speaks  of  curing  pleurisy  in  a  different  way  from  the 
treatment  recommended  in  the  Practica' s  and  tells  how  the 
Salernitans  try  to  prevent  their  hair  from  falling  out  by 
reason  of  their  pores  opening  too  wide  when  they  frequent 
the  bath.^  Renzi  hailed  this  treatise  with  delight  as  "a  true 
medical  clinic,"  ^  since  the  author  describes  some  twenty-two 
specific  cases.  He  states  at  the  beginning  that  he  does  not 
propose  to  write  a  systematic  treatise  or  to  deal  with  every 
variety  of  disease,  but  only  with  those  in  which  he  has 
learned  new  and  better  methods  by  experience,  "and  in  which 
God  has  put  the  desired  effect  in  my  hand."  *  Through  the 
work  we  encounter  such  phrases  as  expertuni  est,  aliud  pro- 
hatissimum,  "I  tell  you  what  I  have  proved,"  "We  have 
tested  this  by  experience  and  rejoiced  at  the  result."  These 
utterances  seem  really  to  refer  to  the  writer's  own  experi- 
ence and  not  to  be  copied  from  previous  authors.  The  fol- 
lowing is  an  example  of  his  cases.  "A  certain  lady  incurred 
paralysis  of  the  face  during  sleep  after  the  bath,"  which  he 
attributes  to  dissolution  of  humors  which  affected  the 
muscles.  First  he  bled  the  cephalic  vein,  hoping  thereby  to 
draw  off   somewhat  the  humors   from  the   afflicted  place. 

*  Renzi,  V,  377-8.  '  Ibid.,  379-8i. 

'  Ibid.,  372-3.  *  Ibid.,  350. 


XXXI        MEDICINE  TO  THE  TWELFTH  CENTURY        739 


Then  for  three  successive  days  he  gave  her  "the  potion  of 
St.  Paul  with  wine  of  a  decoction  of  salvia  and  castoria 
which  in  part  prevent  dissolution,  in  part  consume  it."  He 
also  had  her  hold  that  wine  in  her  mouth  for  a  long  time 
before  swallowing  it.  At  length  he  gave  her  a  purgative 
with  pills  of  yerapiga  {sacrum  amarum),  mixed  with  golden 
pills.  "Afterwards  we  injected  pills  of  diacastoria  into  her 
nostrils  and  placed  her  near  the  fire.  Finally  we  gave 
opopira  (bread  free  from  furfure)  with  the  aforesaid  wine, 
and  so  she  was  cured,  only  a  certain  tumor  remained  in 
her  face  and  made  her  eye  water.  We  anointed  her  face 
with  golden  unguent  and  the  potion  of  St.  Paul  mixed  to- 
gether and  the  tumor  disappeared;  for  the  tears  we  gave 
golden  Alexandrina  and  they  were  checked ;  and  thus  it  was 
that  this  year  in  your  presence  we  cured  a  certain  paralytic."  ^ 
Like  Galen's  accounts  of  his  actual  cases  this  makes  us 
realize  that  all  the  gruesome  mixtures  of  which  we  read  in 
the  books  were  actually  forced  upon  patients,  often  several 
of  them  upon  one  poor  sick  person,  and  that  medical  prac- 
tice was  rather  worse  than  medical  theory.  An  interesting 
observation  concerning  the  lot  of  the  lower  classes  is  let  fall 
by  our  author  when,  in  discussing  involuntary  emission 
of  urine,  he  states  that  serfs  and  handmaids  are  especially 
subject  to  this  ailment,  since  they  go  about  ill-clad  and  with 
bare  feet  and  become  thoroughly  chilled.^ 

Giacosa  classed  one  of  the  treatises  which  he  published 
as  Salernitan  because  it  was  written  in  a  Lombard  or  Monte 
Cassino  hand  of  about  1200.^  He  described  its  contents  as 
purely  therapeutical  and  regarded  its  author  as  showing  "a 
certain  repugnance"  to  the  popular  remedies  and  super- 
stitions recommended  by  other  contemporary  treatises.   For 


A  Saler- 
nitan trea- 
tise of 
about 
1200. 


*  Professor  T.  Wingate  Todd 
comments  upon  this  passage :  "Of 
course  this  is  post  hoc  propter  hoc, 
but  it  is  the  typical  history  of  a 
case  of  Bell's  palsy  occurring  after 
a  'chill.'  " 

'  Renzi,  V,  371,  "Involuntariam 
urine    emissionem    quidam    patie- 


bantur  et  adhuc  multi  patiuntur 
et  maxime  servi  et  ancille  qui 
male  induti  et  discalciati  incedunt, 
unde  frigiditate  incensa  vesica  fit 
quasi  paralitica  cum  urinam  ne- 
queat  continere." 
'Giacosa   (rgoi),  pp.  71-166. 


740  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

this  conclusion  the  chief  evidence  seems  to  be  a  passage 
where  the  author,  after  listing  such  means  to  prevent  a 
woman  from  conceiving  as  binding  her  head  with  a  red  rib- 
bon or  holding  the  stone  found  in  the  head  of  an  ass,  says 
that  he  thinks  that  such  remedies  "operate  more  by  faith 
than  reason."  ^  But  he  makes  much  use  of  parts  of  animals 
and  of  suffumigations,  advising  for  example  on  the  same 
page  that  after  conception  there  should  be  fumigation  with 
a  root  of  mandragora  or  peony  or  the  excrement  of  an 
ass  mixed  with  flour,  an  operation  which  he  characterizes 
as  expertissimiim.  And  on  the  preceding  page,  as  Giacosa 
has  noted,  he  recommends  a  procedure  which  is  even  more 
improbable  than  it  is  immoral,  whereby  patients  who  show 
themselves  ungrateful  to  the  physician  after  they  have  been 
cured  may  be  made  to  suffer  again.^ 
The  We  promised  to  say  something  of  the  female  practi- 

wiyesof      tioners  of  Salerno.     Trotula  is  no  longer  believed  to  be  a 
Salerno.  .  r  o 

woman  and  we  have  to  judge  the  women  of  Salerno  mamly 

by  what  others  say  of  them.  In  a  commentary  of  a  Master 
Bernard  of  Provence,  who  I  suspect  may  be  Bernard 
Gordon,  the  medical  writer  at  Montpellier  of  the  closing 
thirteenth  century,  are  a  number  of  practices  attributed  to 
the  women  of  Salerno  which  Renzi  has  already  brought  to- 
gether.^ In  these  cases  the  practices  are  chiefly  those  em- 
ployed by  the  women  themselves  in  child-birth.  We  may 
note  three  from  the  list  that  savor  strongly  of  magic.  "The 
women  of  Salerno  cook  doves  with  the  acorns  which  the 
doves  eat;  then  they  remove  the  acorns  from  the  gizzard 
and  eat  them,  whence  the  retentive  virtue  is  much  com- 
forted." "When  the  women  of  Salerno  fear  abortion,  they 
carry  with  them  the  pregnant  stone,"  which  our  author  ex- 
plains is  not  the  magnet.  The  other  recipe  had  perhaps 
better  remain  untranslated :  Stercus  asini  comedunt  muliercs 
Salernitanae  in  crispellis  et  dant  viris  siiis  tit  melius  retineant 
sperma  et  sic  coneipiant.    As  we  shall  see  in  our  chapter  on 

*  Giacosa  (1901),  p.  146.  *  Renzi,  V,  33^--- 

'Ibid.,  p.  145. 


XXXI        MEDICINE  TO  THE  TWELFTH  CENTURY        741 

Arnald  of  Villanova,  another  medical  writer  of  the  late 
thirteenth  and  early  fourteenth  century,  he  condemned  the 
use  of  incantations  in  cases  of  child-birth  by  old-wives  of 
Salerno  but  approved  of  a  very  similar  procedure  by  which 
a  priest  had  cured  him  of  warts,  and  also  mentioned  favor- 
ably the  cures  wrought  by  female  practitioners  at  Rome 
and  Montpellier. 


CHAPTER  XXXII 

CONSTANTINUS    AFRICANUS :     C.     IOI5-IO87. 

Reputation  and  influence — His  studies  in  the  Orient — His  later  life 
in  Italy — His  works  were  mainly  translations — Pantegni — Viaticum — 
Other  translations — The  book  of  degrees — On  melancholy — On  disorders 
of  the  stomach — Medical  works  ascribed  to  Alfanus — Constantinus  and 
experiment — "Experiments"  involving  incantations — Superstition  com- 
paratively rare  in  Constantinus — And  of  Greek  rather  than  Arabic 
origin — Some  signs  of  astrology  and  alchemy — Constantinus  and  the 
School  of  Salerno — Liber  aureus  and  John  Affkcius — Aiflacius  more 
superstitious  than  his  master. 


Reputa- 
tion and 
influence. 


Constantinus  Africanus  will  be  here  considered  at  per- 
haps greater  length  than  his  connection  with  the  history 
either  of  magic  or  experimental  science  requires,  but  which 
his  general  importance  in  the  history  of  medicine  and  the 
lack  of  any  good  treatment  of  him  in  English  may  justify.^ 


*  Many  of  the  works  listed  by 
Peter  the  Deacon  and  some  others 
which  he  does  not  name  have  been 
printed  under  Constantinus'  name, 
either  in  the  edition  of  the  works 
of  Isaac  issued  at  Lyons  in  1515, 
or  in  the  partial  edition  of  the 
works  of  Constantinus  printed  at 
Basel  in  1536  and  1539,  or  in  an 
edition  of  Albucasis  published  at 
Basel  in  1541. 

An  early  MS  containing  several 
of  Constantinus'  works  is  Gonville 
and  Caius  411,  I2-I3th  century, 
fol.  I-,  Viaticum,  69-  de  melan- 
cholia, 77v-  de  stomacho,  gSv-  de 
oblivione,  loor-  de  coitu,  (no 
author  is  named  for  logv-  liber 
elefantie,  113-  de  modo  medendi), 
121-  liber  febrium,  (169-  de  inami- 
darium  Galieni). 

The  chief  secondary  investiga- 
tions concerning  Constantinus  Af- 
ricanus are : 

Daremberg,  Notices  et  Extraits 


des  Manuscrits  Medicaux,  1853, 
pp.  63-100,  "Recherches  sur  un 
ouvrage  qui  a  pour  titre  Zad  el- 
Mongafir  en  arabe,  Ephrodes  en 
grec,  Viatique  en  latin,  et  qui  est 
attribue  dans  les  textes  arabes  et 
grecs  a  Abou  Djafar,  et  dans  le 
texte  latin  a  Constantin." 

Puccinotti,  Storia  delta  Medi- 
cina,  II,  i,  pp.  292-350,  1855,  de- 
voted several  chapters  to  Constan- 
tinus and  tried  to  defend  him  from 
the  charge  of  plagiarism  and  to 
maintain  that  the  Viaticum  and 
some  other  works  were  original. 

Steinschneider,  Constantinus  Af- 
ricanus und  seine  arabischen 
Quetlen,  in  Virchow's  Archiv  fur 
Pathologische  Anatomie,  etc.,  Ber- 
lin, 1866,  vol.  37,  pp.  351-410.  This 
should  be  supplemented  by  pp.  9-12 
of  his  Die  curop'dischen  Vbersct- 
sungen  aus  dem  Arabischen 
(1905). 


742 


CHAP.  XXXII       CONSTANTINUS  AFRICANUS  743 

Our  discussion  of  him  as  an  importer  of  Arabic  medicine 
will  also  serve  to  support  our  attitude  towards  the  School 
of  Salerno.  Daremberg  wrote  in  1853,  "We  owe  a  great 
debt  of  gratitude  to  Constantinus  because  he  thus  opened 
for  Latin  lands  the  treasures  of  the  east  and  consequently 
those  of  Greece.  He  has  received  and  he  deserves  from 
every  point  of  view  the  title  of  restorer  of  medical  literature 
in  the  west."  ^  Daremberg  proceeded  to  propose  that  a 
statue  of  Constantinus  be  erected  in  the  center  of  the  Gulf 
of  Salerno  or  on  the  summit  of  Monte  Cassino.  Yet  in 
1870  he  made  the  surprising  assertion  that  "the  voice  of 
Constantinus  towards  the  close  of  the  eleventh  century  is  an 
isolated  voice  and  almost  without  an  echo."  ^  But  as  a 
matter  of  fact  Constantinus  was  a  much  cited  authority 
during  the  twelfth  and  thirteenth  centuries  in  the  works 
both  of  medicine  and  of  natural  science  produced  in  Latin 
in  western  Europe,  and  his  translations  were  cited  under 
his  own  name  rather  than  those  of  their  original  authors.' 

A  brief  sketch  of  Constantinus'  career  and  a  list  of  his    His 
works*  is  twice  supplied  us  by  Peter  the  Deacon,  who  wrote    i^^the^ 
in  the  next  century,^  and  who  treats  of  Constantinus  both    Orient, 
in  the  chronicle  of  Monte  Cassino,  which  he  continued  to 
the  year  1138,^  and  in  his  work  on  the  illustrious  men  of 
Monte  Cassino. ''^     Peter  tells  that  Constantinus  was  born 

^Notices  et  Extraits  des  Manu-  von     seinen     alten     Biographen, 

scrits  Medicaux  (1853),  p.  86.  Petrus  Diaconus  und  Leo  Ostien- 

'  Histoire    des    Sciences    Midi-  sis    verzeichnet    worden"),    since 

cales  (1870),  I,  261.  Leo's    portion    of    the    Chronicle 

^  Indeed  Daremberg  said  in  1853  ends  before  Constantinus  is  men- 

(p.  85,  note)   "dans  le  moyen  age  tioned. 

beaucoup    d'auteurs    citent   volon-  °  Peter  was  born  about  1107  and 

tiers      Constantine      comme      une  was   placed   in   the   monastery  of 

autorite."  Monte  Cassino  by  his  parents  in 

"Perhaps   through   the   fault   of  11 15.         He      became      librarian, 

the  printer  the  list  of  the  writings  Monumenta       Germaniae,     Scrip- 

of    Constantinus    given    by    Peter  tores,  VH,  562  and  565. 

the  Deacon  is  defective  as  repro-  °  Chronica  Mon.  Casinensis,  Lib. 

duced  in  tabular   form  by   Stein-  lH,  auctore  Petro,  MG.  SS.  VII, 

Schneider       (1866),      pp.      353-4.  728-9;    Muratori,    Scriptores,    IV, 

Steinschneider      also      incorrectly  455-6  (lib.  HI,  cap.  35). 

speaks  of  Leo  of  Ostia  as  well  as  '  Petri  Diaconi  De  viribus  illus- 

Peter  the  Deacon  as  a  source  for  tribus    Casinensibus,    cap.    23,    in 

Constantinus  (p.  352,  "Die  Schrif-  Fabricius,  Bibl.  Graec,  XIII,  123. 
ten   Constantins    sind   bekanntlich 


744  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

at  Carthage,  by  which  he  probably  means  Tunis,  since  Car- 
thage was  no  longer  in  existence,  but  went  to  Babylon,  by 
which  Cairo  is  presumably  designated,  since  Babylon  had 
ages  before  been  reduced  to  a  dust  heap,^  to  improve  his  edu- 
cation. His  birth  must  have  been  in  about  1015.  There 
he  is  said  to  have  studied  grammar,  dialectic,  geometry, 
arithmetic,  "mathematics,"  astronomy,  and  physics  or  medi- 
cine {physica).  To  this  curriculum  in  the  Chronicle  Peter 
adds  in  the  Lives  of  Illustrious  Men  the  subjects  of  music 
and  necromancy.  When  so  little  was  said  of  spirits  in  the 
occult  science  of  the  Arabic  authors  of  the  ninth  century 
whom  we  considered  in  an  earlier  chapter,  it  is  rather  a 
surprise  to  hear  that  Constantinus  studied  necromancy,  but 
that  subject  is  listed  along  with  mathematical  and  natural 
sciences  by  Al-Farabi  in  his  De  ortii  scientiarum,^  and  we 
shall  find  this  classification  reproduced  by  two  western  Chris- 
tian scholars  of  the  twelfth  century.^  The  mathematica 
and  astronomy  which  Constantinus  studied  very  likely  also 
included  considerable  astrology  and  divination.  At  any  rate 
we  are  told  that  he  not  only  pursued  his  studies  among  "the 
Chaldeans,  Arabs,  Persians,  and  Saracens,"  and  was  fully 
imbued  with  "all  the  arts  of  the  Egyptians,"  but  even,  like 
ApoUonius  of  Tyana,  visited  India  and  Ethiopia  in  his 
quest  for  learning.  It  was  only  after  a  lapse  of  thirty-nine 
or  forty  years  that  he  returned  to  North  Africa.  Most 
modern  secondary  accounts  here  state  that  Constantinus  was 
soon  forced  to  flee  from  North  Africa  because  of  the  jeal- 
ousy of  other  physicians  who  accused  him  of  magic,*  or 
from  fear  that  his  fellow  citizens  would  kill  him  as  a  wizard. 

^  Yet     modern     compilers     and  "the  science  of  spirits,"  was  also 

writers    of    encyclopedia    articles  reproduced  by   Vincent  of    Beau- 

invariably  repeat   "Carthage"   and  vais     in    the    thirteenth    century, 

'"Babylon."  Speculum  doctritmlc,  XVI. 

*  BN  14700,  fol.  171V,  cited  by  ''Possibly  there  is  some  con- 
Baur  (1903),  who  also  notes  fusion  with  Galen's  similar  ex- 
parallel  passages  in  Al-Gazel,  perience  with  the  physicians  of 
Phil.  tr.  I,  I ;  and  Avicenna,  De  Rome,  which  Constantinus  may 
divis.  philos.,  fol.  141.  have  reproduced  in  some  one  of 

*  Gundissalinus  and  Daniel  Mor-  his  translations  of  Galen  in  such 
ley.  Al-Farabi's  list  of  eight  a  way  as  to  lead  the  reader  to 
mathematical     sciences,     including  consider  it  his  own  experience. 


CONSTANTINUS  AFRICAN  US 


745 


In  view  of  his  study  of  necromancy,  this  may  well  have  been 
the  case.  Peter  the  Deacon,  however,  simply  states  that 
when  the  Africans  saw  him  so  fully  instructed  in  the  studies 
of  all  nations,  they  plotted  to  kill  him,^  and  gives  no  further 
indication  of  their  motives. 

Constantinus  secretly  boarded  ship  and  made  his  escape  His  later 
to  Salerno,  where  he  lived  for  some  time  in  poverty,  until  a  jtaiy" 
brother  of  the  caliph  (regis  Bahiloniorum)  who  chanced  to 
come  there  recognized  him,  after  which  he  was  held  in  great 
honor  by  Duke  Robert  Guiscard.  The  secondary  accounts 
say  that  he  became  Robert's  confidential  secretary  and  that 
he  had  previously  occupied  a  similar  position  under  the 
Byzantine  emperor,  Constantine  Monomachos,^  but  of  these 
matters  again  Peter  the  Deacon  is  silent.  When  Con- 
stantinus left  the  Norman  court,  it  was  to  become  a  monk 
at  Monte  Cassino,  where  he  remained  until  his  death  in  1087. 


^  The  words  are  the  same  both 
in  the  Chronicle  and  Illustrious 
Men:  "quern  cum  vidissent  Afri 
ita  ad  plenum  omnibus  (om- 
nium?) gentium  eruditum,  cogi- 
taverunt  occidere  eum." 

^  Pagel  (1902),  p.  644,  "Vorher 
soil  er  kurze  Zeit  noch  in  Reggio, 
einer  kleinen  Stadt  in  der  Nahe 
von  Byzanz,  als  Protosekretar  des 
Kaisers  Constantinos  Monoma- 
chos  sich  aufgehalten  und  das 
Reisehandbuch  des  Abu  Dschafer 
iibersetzt  haben."  But  Pagel  gives 
no  source  for  this  statement. 

Apparently  the  notion  is  due  to 
the  fact  that  a  Greek  treatise  en- 
titled Ephodia,  of  which  there 
are  numerous  MSS  and  which 
seems  to  be  a  translation  of  the 
same  Arabic  work  as  that  upon 
which  Constantinus  based  his 
Viaticum,  speaks  of  a  Constan- 
tine as  its  author  who  was  proto- 
secretary  and  lived  at  Reggio  or 
Rhegium. 

Daremberg  (1853),  p.  yy,  held 
that  a  Vatican  MS  of  the 
Ephodia  was  of  the  tenth  century 
and  therefore  this  Greek  transla- 
tion could  not  be  the  work  of 
Constantinus  Africanus  in  the 
next    century,    but    Steinschneider 


(1866),  p.  392,  only  says,  "Die 
griechische  Uebersetzung  des 
Viaticum  soil  bis  in  die  Zeit  Con- 
stantins  hinaufreichen." 

Another  MS,  Escorial  &-II-9, 
i6th  century,  fol.  i-,  contains 
a  "Commeatus  Peregrinantium" 
whose  author  is  called  "Ebrubat 
Zafar  filio  Elbazar,"  which  per- 
haps designates  Abu  Jafar 
Ahmed  Ibn-al-Jezzar,  whom  Dar- 
emberg and  Steinschneider  call 
the  author  of  the  Arabic  origi- 
nal of  the  Viaticum.  The  work 
is  said  to  have  been  trans- 
lated into  Greek  "a  Constantino 
Primo  a  secretis  Regis,"  which 
suggests  that  Constantinus  was 
perhaps  first  of  the  royal  secre- 
taries rather  than  of  Reggio 
either  in  Norman  Italy  or  near 
Byzantium.  The  translation  from 
Greek  into  Latin  is  ascribed  to 
Antonius  Eparchus.  The  opening 
sentences  of  each  book  of  this 
Latin  version  from  the  Greek  by 
Eparchus  differ  in  wording  but 
agree  in  substance  with  those  of 
the  Viaticum  of  Constantinus 
Africanus,  if  we  omit  some 
transitional  sentences  in  the 
latter. 


746 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


His  works 
were 
mainly 
transla- 
tions. 


Pantegni. 


In  a  work  addressed  to  the  archbishop  of  Salerno  he  speaks 
of  himself  as  Constantinus  Africaniis  Cassinensis  ^  and 
Albertus  Magnus  cites  him  as  Constantinus  Cassianensis } 
What  purports  to  be  a  picture  of  Constantinus  is  preserved 
in  a  manuscript  of  the  fifteenth  century  at  Oxford.^ 

Peter  the  Deacon  states  both  in  the  Chronicle  and  in  the 
Illustrious  Men  that  while  at  the  monastery  of  Monte 
Cassino  Constantinus  Africanus  "translated  a  great  num- 
ber of  books  from  the  languages  of  various  peoples."  Peter 
then  lists  the  chief  of  these.  It  is  interesting  to  note,  in  view 
of  the  fact  that  Constantinus  in  prefaces  and  introductions 
appears  to  claim  some  of  the  works  as  his  own,  and  that  he 
was  accused  of  fraud  and  plagiarism  by  medieval  writers 
who  followed  him  as  well  as  by  modern  investigators,  that 
Peter  the  Deacon  speaks  of  all  his  writings  as  translations 
from  other  languages.  Peter  does  not,  however,  give  us 
much  information  as  to  who  the  Greek  or  Arabic  authori- 
ties were  whom  Constantine  translated.  It  may  be  added 
that  if  Constantinus  claimed  for  himself  the  credit  for  Latin 
versions  which  were  essentially  translations,  he  was  merely 
continuing  a  practice  of  which  Arabic  authors  themselves  had 
been  repeatedly  guilty.  Indeed,  we  are  told  that  they  some- 
times even  destroyed  earlier  works  which  they  had  copied 
in  order  to  receive  sole  credit  for  ideas  which  were  not  their 
own.* 

The  longest  of  Constantinus'  translations  and  the  one 
most  often  cited  in  the  middle  ages  was  the  Pamtechni  or 
Pantegni,  comprising  ten  books  of  theory  and  ten  of  prac- 


^  Opera   (1536),  p.  215. 

^  De  animalibus,  XXII,  i,  i. 

'Rawlinson  C,  328,  fol.  3-  It 
is  accompanied  by  the  legend, 
"This  is  Constantinus,  monk  of 
Monte  Cassino,  who  is  as  it  were 
the  fount  of  that  science  of  long 
standing  from  the  judgment  of 
urines,  and  it  has  exhibited  a  true 
cure  in  all  the  diseases  in  this 
book  and  in  many  other  books. 
To  whom  come  women  with  urine 
that  he  may  tell  them  what  is  the 


cause  of  the  disease."  The  illu- 
mination shows  Constantinus 
seated,  holding  a  book  on  his 
knees  with  his  left  hand,  while 
he  raises  his  right  hand  and  fore- 
finger in  didactic  style.  He  wears 
the  tonsure,  has  a  beard  but  no 
mustache,  and  seems  to  be  ap- 
proached by  one  woman  and  two 
men  carrying  two  jars  of  urine. 
■"See  Margoliouth,  Avicenna, 
1913,  P-  49. 


XXXII  CONSTANTINUS  AFRICANUS  747 

tice  as  printed  in  15 15  with  the  works  of  Isaac,^  although 
Peter  the  Deacon  speaks  of  Constantinus'  dividing  the 
Pantegni  into  twelve  books  and  then  of  a  Practica  which 
also  consisted  of  twelve  books.  What  is  the  ninth  book 
of  the  Practica  in  this  printed  version  is  listed  as  a  separate 
book  on  surgery  by  Peter  in  his  Illustrious  Men,  although 
omitted  from  his  list  in  the  Chronicle,  and  was  so  printed 
in  the  1536  edition  of  the  works  of  Constantinus.^  And 
the  Antidotarium  which  Peter  lists  as  a  separate  title  is 
probably  simply  the  tenth  book  of  the  Practica  as  printed 
with  the  works  of  Isaac.^  The  Pantegni,  however,  is  not  a 
translation  of  any  work  by  Isaac,  but  an  adaptation  of  the 
Khitaab  el  Maleki,  or  Royal  Art  of  Medicine,  of  Ali  Ibn 
Abbas.  The  preface  of  Constantinus  ^  says  nothing  of  AH 
but  tells  the  abbot  Desiderius  that,  failing  to  find  in  the 
many  works  of  the  Latins  or  even  in  "our  own  writers, 
ancient  and  modern,"  such  as  Hippocrates,  Galen,  Oribasius, 
Paulus,  and  Alexander,  exactly  the  sort  of  treatise  desired, 
he  has  composed  "this  little  work  of  our  own"  (hoc  nostrum 
opusculum) .  But  Stephen  of  Pisa,  who  also  translated  Ali 
into  Latin  in  1127,^  accused  Constantinus  of  having  sup- 
pressed both  the  author's  name  and  title  of  the  book  and 
of  having  made  many  omissions  and  changes  of  order  both 
in  preface  and  text  but  without  really  adding  any  new  con- 
tributions of  his  own.^  Stephen  further  justified  his  own 
translation  by  asserting  that  not  only  had  the  first  part  of 
The  Royal  Art  of  Medicine  of  Ali  Ibn  Abbas  been  "cor- 
rupted by  the  shrewd  fraud  of  its  translator,"  but  also  that 
the  last  and  greater  portion  was  missing  in  the  version  by 

^  Only  the  ten  books  of  theory  Jew,  so  far  as  we  know,  to  devote 

are  printed  in  the  1539  edition  of  himself  to  philosophical  and  scien- 

Constantinus.  tific   discussions." 

^C/MVur^rra,  at  pp.  324-41-  ■'Daremberg     (1853),    pp.    82-5, 

^  Opera  omnia  ysaac  (1515),  fol.  gives  the  prefaces  of  Ali  and  Con- 

i26v,  "Liber  decimus  practice  qui  stantinus  in  parallel  columns, 

antidotarium      dicitur      in      duas  °  Printed  in  1492  with  the  works 

divisus   partes."  of     Ali     ben     Abbas;     Stephen's 

Isaac   Israeli   is   the   subject  of  translation   was   made  at  Antioch 

the  first  chapter  in  Husik  (1916),  in  Syria. 

who   calls   him    (p.   2)    "the  first  '  Steinschneider    (1866),   p.   359. 


748  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 

Constantinus.^  Also  Ferrarius  said  in  his  gloss  to  the 
Universal  Diets  of  Isaac  that  Constantinus  had  completed 
the  translation  of  only  three  books  of  the  Practica,  losing 
the  rest  in  a  shipwreck,^  A  third  medieval  writer,  Giraldus 
Bituricensis,  adds  ^  that  Constantinus  substituted  in  its  place 
the  Liber  simplicis  medicinae  and  Liher  graduum,  and  that 
it  was  Stephen  of  Pisa  who  translated  the  remainder  of 
the  work  of  Ali  ben  Abbas  which  is  called  the  Practica 
Pantegni  et  Stephanonis.  Stephen's  translation  is  indeed 
different  from  the  ten  books  of  the  Practica  printed  with  the 
works  of  Isaac.  From  these  facts  and  from  an  examination 
of  the  manuscripts  of  the  Practica  Rose  concluded  *  that 
Constantinus  wrote  only  its  first  two  books  ^  and  the  first 
part  of  the  ninth,  which  is  roughly  the  same  as  the  Surgery 
published  separately  among  Constantinus'  works.  The  rest 
of  this  ninth  book  was  translated  into  Latin  at  the  time  of 
the  expedition  to  besiege  Majorca,  that  is,  in  1114-1115, 
by  a  John  ^  who  had  recently  been  converted  to  Christianity  "^ 
and  whom  Rose  was  inclined  to  identify  with  John  Afflacius, 
"a  disciple  of  Constantinus,"  of  whom  we  shall  have  more 

*  "Ultimam  et  maiorem  deesse  continens  decern  libros  secunda 
sensi  partem,  alteram  vero  inter-  dicitur  Practica  33  capita  conti- 
pretis  callida  depravatam  fraude."       nens,"  as  a  table  of  contents  writ- 

^Amplon.  Octavo  62.  ten  in  on  the  fly-leaf  states.    The 

'  In  his  gloss  to  the  Viaticum  of  ten   books   of   theory  end  at   fol. 

Constantinus.  loor,    "Explicit    prima    pars    pan- 

*  Berlin  HSS  Verzeichnis  tegni  scilicet  de  theorica.  Incipit 
(1905),  pp.  1059-65,  to  whom  I  secunda  pars  scilicet  practica  et 
owe  the  preceding  references  to  est  primus  liber  de  regimento 
Ferrarius  and  Giraldus.  sanitatis."     This  single  book  in  33 

^  Rose     cites     Bamberg     L-iii-9.  chapters    on    the    preservation    of 

The  two  following  MSS  are  per-  health  ends  at  fol.  ii6v,  and  at  fol. 

haps     also     worth     noting:     The  iiyv  begins  the  Liber  divisionum 

Pantegni     as     contained     in     CU  of  Rasis. 

Trinity    906,    12th    century,    finely  '  In   Berlin  898,  a   12th  century 

written,    fols.     1-141V,    comprises  MS    of    Stephen's    translation    of 

only  ten  books.     The  first  opens,  All's   Practica,   this   ninth   section 

"Cum  totius  generalitas  tres  prin-  by  Constantinus  and  John  is   for 

cipales   partes   habeat" ;   the   tenth  some    reason    substituted    for   the 

ends,      "Unde      acutum      oportet  corresponding  book  of  Stephen, 
habere    sensum   ad   intelligendum.  '  He     calls     himself,     "iohannes 

Explicit."  quidam     agarenus      (Saracenus?) 

St.  John's  85,  close  of  13th  cen-  quondam,    qui    noviter    ad    fidem 

tury,    "Constantini    africani    Pan-  christiane   religionis   venerat  cum 

tegnus     in     duas     partes     divisus  rustico  pisano  belle  filius  ac  pro- 

quarum    prima    dicitur    Theorica  fessione  medicus." 


XXXII  CONSTANTINUS  AFRICANUS  749 

to  say  presently.  Rose  further  held  that  this  John  com- 
pleted the  Practica  ^  commonly  ascribed  to  Constantinus 
with  the  exception  of  its  tenth  book  which,  as  we  have 
suggested,  seems  originally  to  have  been  a  distinct  Antido- 
tarinm.  Different  from  the  Pantegni  is  the  Compendium 
megategni  Galeni  by  Constantinus  published  with  the  works 
of  Isaac,  and  the  Librum  Tegni,  Megategni,  Microtegni 
listed  by  Peter  the  Deacon. 

Perhaps  the  next  best  known  and  the  most  frequently  Viaticum. 
printed  ^  of  Constantinus'  translations  or  adaptations  from 
the  Arabic  is  his  Viaticum  which,  as  Peter  the  Deacon 
states,  is  divided  into  seven  books.  In  the  preface  Con- 
stantinus states  that  the  Pantegni  was  for  more  advanced 
students,  this  is  a  brief  manual  for  others.  He  also  adds 
that  he  appends  his  own  name  to  it  because  there  are  per- 
sons who  profit  by  the  labors  of  others  and,  "when  the  work 
of  someone  else  has  come  into  their  hands,  furtively  and 
like  thieves  inscribe  their  own  names."  Daremberg  desig- 
nated Abu  Jafar  Ahmed  Ibn-al-Jezzar  as  author  of 
the  Arabic  original  of  the  Viaticum.  Moses  Ibn  Tibbon, 
who  made  a  Hebrew  translation  in  1259,  criticized  the  Latin 
version  of  Constantinus  as  often  abbreviated,  obscure,  and 
seriously  altered  in  arrangement.^  Constantinus  seems  to 
be  alluded  to  in  the  Ephodia  or  Greek  version  of  the  same 
work.^ 

*  The    main    objection    to    this  of  Gerardus  de  Solo    (Bituricen- 

theory   is    that    Stephen    of    Pisa,  sis),  "Commentum  eiusdem  super 

translating   in    1127,    speaks   as   if  viatico    cum    textu" ;    and    in    the 

the   latter   portion   of    Ali's   work  Lyons,    1511,    edition    of    Rhazes, 

was       still       untranslated.       Rose  Opera  parva  Albubetri. 
therefore  holds  that  John  had  not  A    fairly    early    but    imperfect 

yet   published   his  translation,   al-  AIS   is    CU   Trinity    1064,    I2-I3th 

though  we  have  seen  that  he  com-  century, 
pleted  the  surgical  section  by  1x15.  Laud.   Misc.  567,  late   12th  cen- 

^  In  Opera  omnia  ysaac,  Lyons,  tury,  fol.  2,  recognizes  in  its  Titu- 

1515,    II,    fols.    144-72,    "Viaticum  lus  that  the  Viaticum  is  a  trans- 

ysaac   quod   constantinus    sibi    at-  lation,    "Incipit   Viaticum   a   Con- 

tribuit" ;  in  the  Basel,  1536,  edition  stantino      in      Latinam      linguam 

of  the  works  of  Constantinus,  pp.  translatam." 
1-167,   under   the   title,   "De   mor-  ^  Steinschneider    (1866),  368-9. 

borum  cognitione  et  curatione  lib.  *  See  above,  page  745,  note  2. 

\ii";   in  the  Venice,   1505,  edition 


750 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Other 
transla- 
tions. 


The 
book  of 
degrees. 


If  neither  the  original  of  the  Pantegni  nor  of  the 
Viaticum  is  to  be  assigned  to  Isaac,  Constantinus  neverthe- 
less did  translate  some  of  his  works,  namely,  those  on  diets, 
urines,  and  fevers.^  Moreover,  Constantinus  himself  admits 
that  these  Latin  works  are  translations,  stating  in  the 
preface  to  the  treatise  on  urines  that,  finding  no  satisfactory 
treatment  of  the  subject  in  Latin,  he  turned  to  the  Arabic 
language  and  translated  the  work  which  Isaac  had  compiled 
from  the  ancients.  Constantinus  also  states  that  he  trans- 
lated the  treatise  on  fevers  from  the  Arabic.  We  have  al- 
ready seen  that  the  alphabetical  Latin  version  of 
Dioscorides  which  had  most  currency  in  the  middle  ages 
is  ascribed  in  at  least  one  manuscript  to  Constantinus.  He 
also  translated  some  treatises  ascribed  to  Hippocrates  and 
Galen,  such  as  Galen's  commentary  on  the  Aphorisms  and 
Prognostics  of  Hippocrates  -  and  the  Tegni  of  Galen.  Con- 
stantinus has  also  been  credited  with  translating  works  of 
Galen  on  the  eyes,  on  diseases  of  women,  and  on  human 
nature,  but  these  are  not  genuine  works  of  Galen. 

In  his  list  of  the  works  which  Constantinus  translated 
from  various  languages.^  Peter  the  Deacon  includes  The 
hook  of  degrees,  but  it  has  not  yet  been  discovered  from 
what  earlier  author,  if  any,  it  is  copied  or  adapted.  The 
work  is  a  development  of   Galen's   doctrine  that  various 


^In  the  1515  edition  of  Isaac's 
works,  I,  II-,  156-,  and  203-. 
Peter  the  Deacon  presumably  re- 
fers to  these  three  works  in 
speaking  of  "Dietam  ciborum. 
Librum  febrium  quern  de  Arabica 
lingua  transtulit.  Librum  de 
urinis."  Whether  the  two  initial 
treatises  in  the  151S  edition  of 
Isaac,  dealing  with  definitions  and 
the  elements,  were  translated  by 
Constantinus  or  by  Gerard  of 
Cremona  is  doubtful. 

'See  CLM  187,  fol.  8;  168,  fol. 
23;  161,  fol.  41;  270,  fol.  10;  13034, 
fol.  49,  for  I3-I4th  century  copies 
of  Galen's  commentary  upon  the 
Aphorisms  of  Hippocrates  with  a 
preface  by  Constantinus. 


University  College  Oxford  89, 
early  14th  century,  fol.  90,  In- 
cipiunt  amphorismi  Ypocratis  cum 
commento  domini  Constantini 
Affricani  montis  Cassienensis 
monachi;  fol.  155,  Eiusdem  Prog- 
nostica  cum  Galeni  commento, 
eodem  interprete;  fols.  203-61, 
Eiusdem  liber  de  regimine  acuto- 
rum  cum  eiusdem  commento 
eodem  interprete. 

^  De  znris  illustribus,  cap.  23, 
".  .  .  transtulit  de  diversis  gen- 
tium linguis  libros  quamplurimos 
in  quibus  praecipue  .  .  ." :  Chron- 
ica, Lib.  Ill,  ".  .  .  transtulit  de 
diversorum  gentium  linguis  libros 
quamplurimos  in  quibus  sunt  hi 
praecipue.  .  .  ." 


XXXII  CONSTANTINUS  AFRICANUS  7Si 

medicinal  simples  are  hot  or  cold,  dry  or  moist,  in  varying 
degrees.  Constantinus  presupposes  four  gradations  of  this 
sort.  Thus  a  food  or  medicine  is  hot  in  the  first  degree  if 
its  heating  power  is  below  that  of  the  normal  human  body; 
if  it  is  of  the  same  temperature  as  the  body,  it  ranks  as 
of  the  second  degree;  if  its  heat  is  somewhat  greater  than 
that  of  the  body,  it  is  of  the  third  degree;  if  its  heat  is 
extreme  and  unbearable,  it  is  of  the  fourth  degree.  The 
rose  is  cold  in  the  first  degree,  is  dry  towards  the  end  of  the 
second  degree,  while  the  violet  is  cold  towards  the  end  of 
the  first  degree  and  moist  in  the  beginning  of  the  second 
degree.  Thus  Constantinus  distinguishes  not  only  four  de- 
grees but  a  beginning,  middle  and  end  of  each  degree,  and 
Peter  the  Deacon  once  gives  the  title  of  the  work  as  The 
book  of  twelve  degrees}  This  interesting  though  crude 
beginning  in  the  direction  of  scientific  thermometry  and 
hydrometry  unfortunately  rested  upon  incorrect  assump- 
tions as  to  the  nature  and  causation  of  heat  and  moisture, 
and  so  was  perhaps  destined  to  do  more  harm  than  good. 

A  glossary  of  herbs  and  species  and  a  work  on  the  pulse,  On  mel- 
which  Peter  the  Deacon  includes  in  both  his  lists  of  Con-  o^^holy. 
stantinus'  works  or  translations,  do  not  seem  to  have  been 
printed  or  identified  as  Constantinus'.  On  the  other  hand, 
the  printed  edition  of  the  works  of  Constantinus  includes 
treatises  on  melancholy  and  on  the  stomach  ^  which  are  not 
mentioned  in  Peter's  list.  In  a  preface  to  the  De  melancholia 
which  is  not  included  in  the  printed  edition  ^  Constantinus 
Africanus  speaks  of  himself  as  a  monk  of  Monte  Cassino 
and  states  that,  while  he  has  often  touched  on  the  disease 
of  melancholy  in  the  many  medical  books  which  he  has 
added  to  the  Latin  language,  he  has  decided  also  to  write  a 
separate  brochure  on  the  subject  because  it  is  an  important 
malady  and  because  it  is  especially  prevalent  "in  these 
regions."     "Therefore  I  have  collected  this  booklet  from 

^  "Librum    duodecim    graduum"  280-98  and  215-74  respectively, 

in  De  viris  illus.:  in  the  Chronicle,  ^  It  is  found  in  Laud.  Misc.  567, 

"Liber  graduum."  late  12th  century,  fol.  51V. 

*  Edition  of   Basel,    1536,  at  pp. 


752 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


On 

disorders 
of  the 
stomach. 


many  volumes  of  our  adepts  in  this  art."  Whether  the  word 
"our"  here  refers  to  Greek  or  Arabic  writers  would  be  hard 
to  say.  Constantinus  states  that  melancholy  is  a  disease  to 
which  those  are  especially  liable  who  are  always  intent  on 
study  and  books  of  philosophy,  "because  of  their  scientific 
investigations  and  tiring  their  memories  and  grieving  over 
the  failure  of  their  minds."  This  ailment  also  afflicts 
"those  who  lose  their  beloved  possessions,  such  as  their 
children  and  dearest  friends  or  some  precious  thing  which 
cannot  be  restored,  as  when  scholars  suddenly  lose  their 
books."  Constantinus  also  describes  the  melancholy  of 
"many  religious  persons  who  live  lives  to  be  revered,  but 
fall  into  this  disease  from  their  fear  of  God  and  contempla- 
tion of  the  last  judgment  and  desire  of  seeing  the  summum 
honum.  Such  persons  think  of  nothing  and  seek  for  noth- 
ing save  to  love  and  fear  God  alone,  and  they  incur  this 
complaint  and  become  drunk  as  it  were  with  their  excessive 
anxiety  and  vanity."  ^  Such  passages  would  seem  to  de- 
scribe Constantinus'  own  associates  and  environment,  but 
they  may  possibly  be  a  mere  translation  of  some  work  of 
an  earlier  Christian  Arab,  such  as  Honein  ben  Ishak  who 
translated  or  pretended  to  translate  a  number  of  works  of 
Greek  medicine  into  Arabic.  In  a  later  chapter  ^  we  shall 
find  that  Honein  perhaps  had  something  to  do  with  another 
work  called  The  Secrets  of  Galen,  in  which  remedies  for 
religious  ascetics  who  have  ruined  their  health  by  their 
austerities  form  a  rather  prominent  feature. 

That  the  treatise  on  disorders  of  the  stomach  is  Con- 
stantinus' own  work  is  indicated  by  its  preface,  which  is 
addressed  to  Alfanus,  archbishop  of  Salerno  from  1058  to 
1087  and  earlier  a  monk  of  Monte  Cassino.  Alfanus  had 
himself  translated  Nemesius  Ilept  <i)mem  avdpuTov^  and  was 
the  center  of  a  group  of  learned  writers :  the  dialectician, 
Alberic  the  Deacon,  the  historian,  Amatus  of  Salerno,  and 


*  Edition  of  1536,  pp.  283-4. 
'  See  below,  Chapter  64. 


'Zeitsch.  f.  klass.Philol.  (1896), 
pp.  logSff. 


XXXII 


CONSTANTINUS  AFRICAN  US 


753 


the  mathematician  and  astronomer,  Pandulf  of  Capua. ^ 
Constantinus  states  that  he  writes  this  treatise  for  Alfanus 
as  a  compensation  for  his  recent  failure  to  reheve  a  stomach- 
ache with  which  that  prelate  was  afflicted.  Such  instances 
of  self-confessed  failure,  be  it  noted  in  passing,  are  rare 
indeed  in  ancient  and  medieval  medicine,  and  for  this  reason 
we  are  the  more  inclined  to  deal  charitably  with  the  charges 
of  literary  plagiarism  which  have  been  preferred  against 
Constantinus.  He  goes  on  to  say  that  he  has  sought  with 
great  care  but  in  vain  among  ancient  writings  for  any 
treatise  devoted  exclusively  to  the  stomach,  and  has  only 
succeeded  in  finding  here  and  there  scattered  discussions 
which  he  now  presumably  combines  in  the  present  special 
treatise. 

This  archbishop  Alfanus  appears  to  have  written  on 
medicine  himself,  since  A  treatise  of  Alfanus  of  Salerno 
concerning  certain  medical  questions  was  listed  among  the 
books  at  Christchurch,  Canterbury  about  1300.^  Also  a 
collection  of  recipes  entitled,  Experiments  of  an  archbishop 
of  Salerno,  in  a  manuscript  of  the  early  twelfth  century  are 
very  likely  by  him.^  They  follow  a  treatise  on  melancholy 
which  does  not,  however,  appear  to  be  that  of  Constantinus 
Africanus.* 

Peter  the  Deacon's  bibliography  of  the  works  of  Con- 
stantinus includes  a  De  experimentis  which,  if  extant,  has 
not  been  identified  as  Constantinus'.  In  such  works  of  his 
as  are  available,  however,  we  find  a  number  of  mentions 
of  experience  and  its  value.  It  is  of  course  to  be  remem- 
bered that  such  expressions  as  "we  state  what  we  have 
tested  and  what  our  authorities  have  used,"  ^  and  "we  have 
had  personal  experience  of  the  confection  which  we  now 
mention,"  ^  may  refer  to  the  experience  of  the  past  authors 


*  J.  A.  Endres,  Petrus  Damiani 
und  die  weltliche  Wissenschaft, 
1910,  P-  35,  in  Beitr'dge,  VIII,  3. 

'James  (1903),  p.  59,  "Tracta- 
tus  Alfani  Salernitanus  de  quibus- 
dam  questionibus  medicinalibus." 

'  CU    Trinity    1365,    early    12th 


century,  fols.  155-162V,  Experi- 
menta  archiep.  Salernitani. 

*  Judging  from  its  opening  and 
closing  words  as  given  by  James. 

^  De  coitu,  edition  of  1536,  p. 
306. 

'  Viaticum,  VI,  19. 


Medical 
works 
ascribed  to 
Alfanus. 


Constan- 
tinus and 
experi- 
ment. 


754 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


"Experi- 
ments" in- 
volving 
incanta- 
tions. 


whose  works  Constantinus  is  using  or  translating  rather 
than  to  his  own.  In  the  Pantegni  ^  "ancient  medical  writers" 
are  divided  into  experientes  and  rationabiles,  and  we  are 
told  that  the  empirics  declare  that  compound  medicines  can 
be  discovered  only  in  dreams  and  by  chance,  while  the 
rationalists  hold  that  these  can  be  deduced  from  a  knowl- 
edge of  the  virtues  and  qualities  and  accidents  of  bodies  and 
diseases.  This  much  is  of  course  simply  Galen  over  again. 
Constantinus  occasionally  gives  medical  "experiments,"  as 
in  the  case  of  "proved  experiments  to  eject  reptiles  from  the 
body,"  ^  or  the  placing  of  a  live  chicken  on  the  place  bitten 
by  a  mad  dog.  The  chicken  will  then  die  while  the  man 
will  be  cured  "beyond  a  doubt."  ^  Such  medical  "experi- 
ments" by  Constantinus  were  often  cited  by  subsequent 
medieval  writers. 

Incantations  are  involved  in  some  of  these  "experi- 
ments." One  approved  experiment,  we  are  told,  consists 
in  whispering  in  the  ear  of  the  patient  the  words.  Recede 
demon  quia  dee  fanolcri  precipiunt.  The  effect  of  this 
procedure  is  that  when  the  epileptic  rises,  after  remaining 
like  one  dead  for  an  hour,  he  will  answer  any  question  that 
may  be  put  to  him.  Another  experiment  to  cure  epilepsy 
is  frequently  cited  by  subsequent  medieval  medical  writers 
from  Constantinus,  and,  while  it  may  not  have  originated 
with  him,  is  apparently  of  Christian  rather  than  Greek  or 
Mohammedan  origin.  If  the  epileptic  has  parents  living, 
they  are  to  take  him  to  church  on  the  day  of  the  four  seasons 
and  have  him  hear  mass  on  the  sixth  day  and  also  on  Satur- 
day. When  he  comes  again  on  Sunday  the  priest  is  to  write 
down  the  passage  in  the  Gospel  where  it  says,  "This  kind 
is  not  cast  out  save  by  fasting  and  prayer."  Presumably 
the  epileptic  is  to  wear  this  writing,  in  which  case  a  sure 
cure  is  promised,  "be  he  epileptic  or  lunatic  or  demoniac." 
But  it  is  added  that  the  charm  will  not  work  in  the  case  of 
persons  born  of  incestuous  marriages.* 

*  PracHca,  X,  i ;  in  Isaac,  Opera,  '  Ihid._,  IV,  27  ',  f ol.  96r. 

1515,  II,  fol.  126.  *  Ibid.,  V,  17;  fol.  99r. 

mid.,  VII,  31;  fol.  iiir. 


XXXII 


CONSTANTINUS  AFRICANUS 


755 


But  as  a  rule  incantations  and  superstitious  ceremony 
are  comparatively  rare  in  the  works  of  Constantinus,  which 
contain  little  to  justify  the  charge  of  magic  said  to  have  been 
made  against  him  in  Africa  or  the  charge  of  superstition 
made  against  the  Arabic  medicine  which  his  writings  so 
largely  reflect.  Also  these  superstitious  passages  seem 
limited  to  the  treatment  of  certain  ailments  of  a  mysterious 
character  like  epilepsy  and  insanity,  which,  Constantinus 
says,  the  populace  call  divinaHo  and  account  for  by  posses- 
sion by  demons.^  It  is  against  epilepsy  and  phantasy  that 
it  is  recommended  to  give  a  child  to  swallow  before  it  has 
been  weaned  the  brains  of  a  goat  drawn  through  a  golden 
ring.  And  it  is  for  epilepsy  that  we  find  such  suspensions 
as  hairs  from  an  entirely  white  dog  or  the  small  red  stones 
in  swallows'  gizzards,  from  which  they  must  have  been 
removed  at  midday.  When  Constantinus  is  treating  of  eye 
and  ear  troubles,  or  even  of  paralysis  of  the  tongue  and 
toothache,  use  of  amulets  is  infrequent  and  there  is  only 
an  occasional  suggestion  of  marvelous  virtue.  Gout  is 
treated  with  unguents  and  recipes  but  without  the  super- 
stitious ligatures  often  found  in  medieval  works  of  medi- 
cine. ^  Parts  of  animals  are  employed  a  good  deal :  thus 
if  you  anoint  the  entire  body  with  lion  fat,  you  will  have 
no  fear  of  serpents,  and  binding  on  the  head  the  fresh  lung 
of  an  ox  is  good  for  frenzy.^  But  Constantinus  more  often 
explains  the  action  of  things  in  nature  from  their  four 
qualities  of  hot,  cold,  moist,  and  dry,  than  he  does  by  as- 
suming the  existence  of  occult  virtues. 

It  is  also  to  be  noted  that  those  passages  where  Con- 
stantinus' medicine  borders  most  closely  upon  magic  are 
apt  to  be  borrowed  from,  or  at  least  credited  to,  Galen  and 
Dioscorides.  Neither  Constantinus  nor  his  Arabic  authori- 
ties introduced  most  of  these  superstitious  elements  into 
medicine.     In  his  work  on  degrees  Constantinus  repeats 


Super- 
stition 
compara- 
tively rare 
in  Con- 
stantinus. 


And  of 

Greek 

rather 

than 

Arabic 

origin. 


^  De  melancholia  (1536),  p.  290. 
'  Practica,  VIII,  40;  ed.  of  1515, 
j1.  ii8v. 


'  Practica,  IV,  39,  and  V,  7;  ed. 
of  15x5,  fols.  96r  and  gSr. 


756 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Some 
signs  of 
astrology 
and 
alchemy. 


Galen's  story  of  the  boy  who  fell  into  an  epileptic  fit  when- 
ever the  suspended  peony  was  removed  from  his  neck.^  In 
the  Viaticum  ^  he  ascribes  the  suspension  of  a  white  dog's 
hairs  and  the  use  of  various  other  parts  of  animals  for 
epileptics  to  Dioscorides,  but  they  do  not  seem  to  be  found 
in  that  author's  extant  works.  Water  in  which  blacksmiths 
have  quenched  their  irons  is  another  remedy  prescribed  for 
various  disorders  upon  the  authority  of  Dioscorides  and 
Galen. ^  Theriac  and  terra  sigillata  are  of  course  not  for- 
gotten. That  there  is  a  magnetic  mountain  on  the  shore  of 
the  Indian  Ocean  which  draws  all  the  iron  nails  out  of 
passing  ships,  and  that  the  magnet  extracts  arrows  from 
wounds  is  stated  on  the  authority  of  the  Lapidary  of  Aris- 
totle, a  spurious  work.  Constantinus  adds  that  Rufus  says 
that  the  magnet  comforts  those  afflicted  with  melancholy 
and  removes  their  fears  and  suspicions.^  However,  it  is 
without  citation  of  other  authors  that  Constantinus  states 
that  the  plant  agnus  casttis  will  mortify  lust  if  it  is  merely 
suspended  over  the  sleeper.^ 

There  is  not  a  great  deal  of  astrological  medicine  in  the 
works  of  Constantinus  Africanus.  There  are  some  allusions 
to  the  moon  and  dog-days,^  Galen  being  twice  cited  to  the 
effect  that  epilepsy  in  a  waxing  moon  is  a  very  moist  dis- 
ease, while  in  a  waning  moon  it  is  very  cold.  In  a  chapter 
of  the  Pantegni  '^  the  relation  of  critical  days  to  the  course 
of  the  moon  and  also  to  the  nature  of  number  is  discussed. 
In  another  passage  of  the  same  work  ^  we  read  that  if 
other  remedies  fail  in  the  case  of  a  patient  who  cannot  hold 
his  water  while  in  bed,  he  should  eat  the  bladder  of  a  river 
fish  for  eight  days  while  the  moon  is  waxing  and  waning 


*Ed.  of  1536,  p.  358;  also  in  the 
Viaticum,  I,  22 ;  p.  20. 
'Viaticum,  I,  22;  p.  21. 

*  Viaticum>,  VII,  13:  De  gradi- 
bus  (1536),  p.  377- 

*  According  to  Steinschneider 
(1866),  p.  402,  it  is  only  from  the 
citations  of  Constantinus  that  we 
know  of  a  work  by  Rufus  on 
melancholy.  See  especially  De 
melancholia    (1536),    p.    285,    "In- 


Rufum        clarissimum 
de    melancholia    fecisse 


venimus 
medicum 
librum.  .  .  ." 

^  De  gradibus  (1536),  p.  378. 

'Edition    of    1536,    pp.    20,    290, 
356. 

'' Theorica,   X,   9;    ed.    of    1515, 
fol.  54. 

"Practica,  VII,  59    (iSrS),   fol. 
114V. 


XXXII 


CONSTANTINUS  AFRICAHXJS 


7S7 


and  he  will  be  freed  from  the  complaint.  But  Hippocrates 
testifies  that  in  old  men  the  ailment  is  incurable.  But  the 
principal  astrological  passage  that  I  have  found  in  the  works 
of  Constantinus  is  that  in  De  humana  natura  ^  where  he 
traces  the  formation  of  the  child  in  the  womb  and  the  in- 
fluence of  the  planets  upon  the  successive  months  of  the 
process,  and  explains  why  children  born  in  the  seventh  or 
ninth  month  live  while  those  born  in  the  eighth  month  die. 
This  passage  was  cited  by  Vincent  of  Beauvais  in  his  Specu- 
lum naturale.^  Belief  in  alchemy  is  suggested  when  Con- 
stantinus repeats  the  assertion  of  some  book  on  stones  that 
lead  would  be  silver  except  for  its  smell,  its  softness,  and 
its  inability  to  endure  fire.^ 

The  relation  of  Constantinus  Africanus  to  the  School 
of  Salerno  has  been  the  subject  of  much  dispute  and  of 
divergent  views.  Some  have  held  that  Salerno's  medical 
importance  practically  began  with  him ;  others  have  tried  to 
maintain  for  Salernitan  medicine  a  Neo-Latin  character 
quite  distinct  from  Constantinus'  introduction  of  Arabic 
influence.  From  the  fact  that  Constantinus  passed  from 
Salerno  to  Monte  Cassino,  where  most,  if  not  all,  of  his 
writing  seems  to  have  been  done,  it  has  been  assumed  that 
there  was  an  intimate  connection  between  the  monks  and 
the  rise  of  a  medical  school  at  Salerno.  On  the  other  hand, 
Renzi  and  Rashdall  have  ridiculed  the  notion,  declaring  the 
distance  and  difficulty  of  communication  between  the  two 
places  to  be  an  insurmountable  difficulty.  It  must  be  re- 
membered, however,  that  Constantinus  himself  both  at- 
tended the  archbishop  of  Salerno  in  a  case  of  stomach 
trouble  and  sent  a  treatise  on  the  subject  to  him  afterwards. 
A  strong  personal  influence  by  him  upon  the  practice  and 
still  more  upon  the  literature  of  Salernitan  medicine  is 
therefore  not  precluded,  though  his  stay  at  Salerno  may 
have  been  brief  and  his  literary  labor  performed  entirely 


Constan- 
tinus 
and  the 
School  of 
Salerno. 


*Ed.  of  1541,  pp.  319-21. 

'Spec.  not..  XVI,  49. 

'De    gradibus    (1536),    p. 


360, 


"de    quo    Arabu    (Aristotle?)    in 
libro  de  lapidibus  intitulato." 


758 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Liber 
aureus 
and  John 
Afflacius. 


at  the  monastery.  In  any  case  a  Master  John  Afflacius, 
who  is  associated  with  other  Salernitan  writers  in  a  com- 
pilation from  their  works,  was  a  disciple  of  Constantinus 
and,  as  we  are  about  to  see,  perhaps  the  author  of  some  of 
the  treatises  which  have  been  published  under  Constantinus' 
name.  It  certainly  would  seem  that  Constantinus  and  his 
disciple  have  as  good  a  right  to  be  called  Salernitan  as 
most  of  the  authors  included  in  Renzi's  collection. 

In  a  medical  manuscript  which  Henschel  discovered  at 
Breslau  in  1837  ^  and  which  he  regarded  as  a  composition 
of  the  School  of  Salerno  and  dated  in  the  twelfth  century, 
he  found  in  the  case  of  two  works  compiled  from  various 
authors  ^  that  the  passages  ascribed  to  a  Master  John 
Afflacius,  who  was  described  as  "a  disciple  of  Con- 
stantinus," ^  were  identical  with  passages  in  the  Liher  aureus 
or  De  remediorum  et  aegritudinum  cognitione  published  as 
a  work  of  Constantinus  in  the  Basel  edition  of  1536.  He 
also  identified  a  Liher  urinarum  attributed  to  the  same  John 
Afflacius,  disciple  of  Constantinus,  in  the  Breslau  manu- 
script with  the  De  urinis  which  follows  the  Liber  aureus 
in  the  printed  edition  of  Constantinus'  works.  Thus  either 
the  pupil  appropriated  or  completed  and  published  the  work 
of  his  master,  or  Constantinus  had  the  same  good  fortune 
in  having  his  own  name  attached  to  the  compositions  of 
his  pupil  ^  as  in  the  case  of  the  writings  of  his  Arabic 
predecessors. 

It  may  be  further  noted  that  the  disciple  seems  to  have 
been  more  superstitious  than  the  master,  for  in  one  of  the 
passages  ascribed  to  Afflacius  in  the  aforesaid  compilation. 


*  Manoscritto  Salernitano  di- 
lucidato  dal  Prof.  Henschel,  in 
Renzi  (1853),  II,  1-80,  especially 
pp.  16,  41,  59. 

"  De  aegritudinum  curatione 
tractatus,  Renzi,  II,  81-386;  De 
febribus  tractatus,  II,  737-68. 

^The  preface  to  Constantinus' 
translation  of  Isaac  on  fevers  is 
addressed  to  his  "dearest  son, 
John" :  see  Brussels,  Library  of 
Dukes    of    Burgundy    15489,    14th 


century,  "Quoniam  te  karissime 
fili  lohanne" ;  Cambrai  914,  13- 
14th  century;  Cambrai  907,  14th 
century,  fol.  i,  Prefatio  Con- 
stantlni  ad  Johannem  discipulum. 
*  However,  in  an  Oxford  MS 
the  Liber  aureus  itself  is  ascribed 
to  "John,  son  of  Constantinus": 
Bodleian  2060,  #1,  Joannis  filii 
Constantini  de  re  medica  liber 
aureus. 


xxxi: 


CONSTANTINUS  AFRICANUS 


759 


after  the  correspondence  with  the  Liher  aureits  has  ceased,  Afflacius 
the  text  goes  on  to  prescribe  the  suspension  of  goat's  horn  ^pg^j.. 
over  one's  head  as  a  soporific  and  gives  the  following  stitious 
"prognostic  of  life  or  death."  Smear  the  forehead  of  the  master, 
patient  from  ear  to  ear  with  musam  encam.  "If  he  sleeps, 
he  will  live ;  but  if  not,  he  will  die ;  and  this  has  been  tested 
in  acute  fevers."  Another  method  is  to  try  if  the  patient's 
urine  will  mix  with  the  milk  of  a  woman  who  is  suckling  a 
male  child.  If  it  will,  he  will  live.  Another  procedure  to 
induce  sleep  is  then  given,  which  consists  in  reading  the 
first  verse  of  the  Gospel  of  John  nine  times  over  the  pa- 
tient's head,  placing  beneath  his  head  a  missal  or  psalter 
and  the  names  of  the  seven  sleepers  written  on  a  scroll. 
This  is  not  the  first  instance  of  such  Christian  magic  that  we 
have  encountered  in  connection  with  the  School  of  Salerno 
and  we  begin  to  suspect  that  it  was  rather  characteristic. 
At  any  rate  it  was  not  uncommon  in  medieval  medicine  in 
general  and  was  almost  certainly  introduced  before  Innocent 
III  who  in  121 5  forbade  ordeals  and  who  frowned  on 
other  superstitious  practices.  Probably  such  Christian 
magic  dates  from  a  period  before  Arabic  influence  began 
to  be  felt.  Thus  again  we  have  reason  to  doubt  whether 
early  medieval  medicine  or  Salernitan  medicine  was  less 
superstitious  than  Arabic  medicine  or  than  medieval  medi- 
cine after  the  introduction  of  Arabic  medicine.  At  least 
Constantinus  Africanus  who  represents  the  introduction  of 
translations  from  the  Arabic  is  comparatively  free  from 
superstition. 


CHAPTER  XXXIII 

TREATISES    ON    THE    ARTS  BEFORE    THE    INTRODUCTION    OF 
ARABIC  ALCHEMY 

Latin  treatises  on  the  arts  and  colors — Progress  of  the  arts  even 
during  the  early  middle  ages — Scantiness  of  the  sources — Character 
of  Arabic  alchemy — Dififerent  character  of  our  Latin  treatises — Com- 
positiones  ad  tingenda — Mappe  Clavicula — Some  of  its  recipes — Ques- 
tion of  symbolic  nomenclature — Magical  procedure  with  goats :  in 
Mappe  Clavicula — Similar  passages  in  Heraclius — And  Theophilus — A 
magic  figure — Use  of  an  incantation  in  tenth  century  alchemy — Experi- 
mental character  of  the  work  of  Theophilus — How  to  make  Spanish 
gold — The  question  of  symbolic  terminology  again — Alchemy  in  the 
eleventh  century — St.  Dunstan  and  alchemy  and  magic — Introduction  of 
Arabic  alchemy  in  the  twelfth  century. 

".  .  .  campum    latissimum    diversarum    artium    perscru- 
tari.  .  .  ." 

— Theophilus,  Schedula,  I,  Praefatio. 

Latin  We  come  to  the  consideration  of  several  treatises  dealing 

orfthe^^  with  colors  and  the  arts  and  dating  from  about  the  eighth 
arts  and  to  the  twelfth  centuries  and  probably  in  part  of  earlier 
origin.  These  are  the  Compositiones  ad  tingenda  in  a  manu- 
script of  the  eighth  or  ninth  century,  the  Mappe  clavicula 
found  in  part  in  a  tenth  century  manuscript  and  more  fully 
in  one  of  the  twelfth  century,  the  poem  of  Heraclius  on 
The  colors  and  arts  of  the  Romans,  and  the  remarkable 
treatise  of  Theophilus  On  diverse  arts  in  three  books.  ^    The 

*  Interest  in  such  works  was  colorihus  et  de  artibus  Rotnano- 
aroused  by  the  almost  simultane-  rum,  in  Mrs.  Merrifield's  Ancient 
ous  publication  of  R.  Hendrie's  Practice  of  Painting,  London, 
English  translation  of  Theophilus,  1849.  Hendrie  printed  the  Latin 
London,  1847;  the  publication  of  text  of  Theophilus  with  his  trans- 
the  Mappe  clavicula  in  a  "Let-  lation.  A.  Ilg  published  a  revised 
ter  from  Sir  Thomas  Phillipps  to  Latin  text  with  a  German  trans- 
Albert  Way"  in  Archaeologia,  lation  in  1874,  with  a  fuller  ac- 
XXXII,  183-244,  London,  1847;  count  of  the  MSS. 
and  the  inclusion  of  Heraclius,  De 

760 


CHAP,  xxxiii        TREATISES  ON  THE  ARTS  761 

oldest  known  manuscripts  of  Theophilus  are  of  the  twelfth 
century  and  he  has  been  dated  at  the  beginning  of  that  cen- 
tury or  end  of  the  eleventh,  and  Heraclius,  from  whom  he 
takes  a  number  of  his  chapters,  still  earlier.  But  it  scarcely 
seems  that  some  of  Theophilus'  descriptions  of  ecclesiastical 
art  would  have  been  written  before  the  twelfth  century. 
Mrs.  Merrifield  regarded  only  the  first  two  metrical  books  of 
The  colors  and  arts  of  the  Romans  as  the  work  of 
Heraclius,  and  the  third  book  in  prose  as  a  later  addition 
of  the  twelfth  or  thirteenth  century  and  probably  written 
by  a  Frenchman,  whereas  she  believed  that  Heraclius  wrote 
in  southern  Italy  under  Byzantine  influence.^  His  poem 
sounds  to  me  like  an  attempt  to  imitate  Lucretius,  while 
one  also  is  inclined  to  associate  it  with  the  perhaps  nearly 
contemporary  poems  in  which  the  so-called  Macer  and 
Marbod  recounted  in  verse  form  some  of  the  properties  of 
herbs  and  stones  which  they  had  learned  from  ancient 
writers. 

Berthelot  regarded  these  treatises  on  the  arts  as  proof  Progress 
that  the  knowledge  of  industrial  and  alchemical  processes  '^^^^  ^^^^ 
continued  unbroken  even  in  western  Europe  from  Egypt  to   during 

^  ^-^^  the  early 

the  middle  ages,  although  he  held  that  the  theories  of  trans-  middle 
mutation  and  the  like  reached  the  west  only  in  the  twelfth  ^^^^' 
century  through  the  Arabs. ^  Moreover,  there  is  progress 
in  the  technical  processes  just  as  there  was  progress  in 
Romanesque  and  Gothic  art.  New  items  and  recipes  appear 
in  the  lists.  Even  in  the  declining  Roman  Empire  and 
earliest  middle  age  we  have  evidence  of  new  discoveries. 
The  artificial  fabrication  of  cinnabar  becomes  known  at 
some  time  after  Dioscorides  and  Pliny  and  before  the  eighth 
century.^  The  hydrostatic  balance  is  described  not  only 
in  the  Mappe  clavicula  but  in  the  Carmen  de  ponderibus  of 
Priscian  or  of  Q.  Remnius  Fannius  Palaemo  of  the  fourth 

*  Merrifield  (1849),  I,  166-74.  thirty-eight  years  too  late  in  that 

*  Berthelot    (1893),    I,    29.      He      century,    mistaking    the    Spanish 
dated,  however,  Robert  of   Ches-      for  the  Christian  era. 

ter's      translation      of      Morienus  'Ibid.,  p.  18. 


762 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE 


CHAP. 


Scantiness 
of  the 
sources. 


or  fifth  century  A.  D.^  Heraclius  speaks  more  than  once 
in  his  poem  with  admiration  of  the  works  of  art  of  the 
Roman  "kings"  and  people,  and  asks,  "Who  now  is  capable 
of  investigating  these  arts,  is  able  to  reveal  to  us  what  those 
potent  artificers  of  immense  intellect  discovered  for  them- 
selves ?"  ^  However,  his  aim  is  to  resurrect  these  arts ;  he 
assures  the  reader  that  he  writes  nothing  which  he  has  not 
first  proved  himself ;  ^  and  he  tells  in  particular  how  he  dis- 
covered by  close  scrutiny  of  a  piece  of  Roman  glass  that 
there  was  gold-leaf  placed  between  two  layers  of  glass,  a 
work  which  he  successfully  imitated.  ^  On  the  other  hand, 
lead  glazing,  according  to  Alexandre  Brongniart,  director  of 
the  Sevres  manufactory,  is  not  found  in  European  pottery 
before  the  twelfth  century,  when  it  was  applied  in  Pesaro 
about  1 100  and  is  found  on  pottery  in  a  tomb  at  Jumieges  of 
about  1120.^ 

During  the  early  medieval  centuries  the  Byzantine  Em- 
pire, Syria  and  Egypt  after  they  were  conquered  by  the 
Arabs,  the  busy  streets  of  Bagdad  and  Cordova,  and  Persia 
undoubtedly  produced  a  far  more  flourishing  activity  in  the 
fine  arts  and  the  industrial  arts  than  was  the  case  in  back- 
ward western  Christian  Europe.  Yet  the  surviving  evidence 
for  such  activity  is  disappointing,  and  seems  limited  to  some 
notices  and  allusions  in  Arabian  and  Jewish  travelers  and 
historians,  and  to  the  dust-heaps  of  ruined  cities  like  Fostat, 
Rai,  and  Rakka.  As  the  finest  early  specimens  of  Byzantine 
mosaics  are  preserved  in  Italy  at  Ravenna,  so  our  Latin 
treatises  concerning  the  arts  are  perhaps  the  best  extant  for 
the  early  medieval  period  up  to  the  twelfth  century. 

*Berthelot    (1893),  I,  169. 

'Merrifield  (1849),  I,  183.  See 
also  pp.  189-91. 

'Ibid.,  p.  183,  "Nil  tibi  scribo 
equidem  quod  non  prius  ipse  pro- 
bassem." 

*Ibid.,  p.  187. 

**  Traite  des  Arts  Ceramiques,  p. 
304,  cited  by  Merrifield,  I,  177. 
This  is  not,  however,  to  be  re- 
garded as  the  invention  of  lead 
glazing,  since,  as  William  Burton 


writes  ("Ceramics"  in  EB,  p.  706), 
"lead  glazes  were  extensively  used 
in  Egypt  and  the  nearer  East  in 
Ptolemaic  times."  He  adds,  "And 
it  is  significant  that,  though  the 
Romans  made  singularly  little  use 
of  glazes  of  any  kind,  the  pottery 
that  succeeded  theirs,  either  in 
western  Europe  or  in  the  Byzan- 
tine Empire,  was  generally  cov. 
ered  with  glazes  rich  in  lead." 


XXXIII 


TREATISES  ON  THE  ARTS 


763 


A  number  of  treatises  on  alchemy  in  Arabic  have  reached 
us  but  they,  Hke  the  Byzantine,  chiefly  continue  the  fantastic 
mysticism  and  obscurity,  the  astrology  and  magic,  of  the 
ancient  Greek  alchemists.  Thus  in  the  Book  of  Crates  we 
have  a  virgin  priestess  of  the  temple  of  Serapis  at  Alexan- 
dria, and  the  snake  Ouroburos,  also  a  vision  of  the  seven 
heavens  of  the  planets.  The  Book  of  Alhabib  invokes 
Hermes  Trismegistus  and  says  that  the  sages  have  not  re- 
vealed the  secret  of  transmutation  for  fear  of  the  anger 
of  the  demons.  The  Book  of  Ostanes,  in  which  Andalusia 
is  mentioned,  has  eighty-four  different  names  for  the 
philosopher's  stone,  and  a  fantastic  dream  concerning  seven 
doors  and  three  inscriptions  in  Egyptian,  concerning  the 
Persian  Magi,  and  a  citation  from  an  Indian  sage  concern- 
ing the  healing  virtues  of  the  urine  of  a  white  elephant. 
The  Book  of  Like  Weights  of  Geber  states  that  the  sage 
can  discern  the  mixture  of  the  four  elements  in  animals, 
plants,  and  stones  by  astrology  and  many  other  signs  in- 
volving varied  superstition.  His  Book  of  Sympathy  again 
emphasizes  the  seven  planets  as  the  key  to  alchemy  and 
has  much  about  the  spirit  in  matter.  His  Book  on  Quick- 
silver, although  it  promises  clarity,  is  the  most  mystic  and 
incomprehensible  of  all.  In  it  we  read  of  raising  the  dead 
and  of  use  of  such  liquids  as  "a  divine  water"  and  the  milk 
of  an  uncorrupted  virgin.^ 

Our  Latin  treatises  are  as  free  from  mysticism  and 
obscurity,  from  dreams  and  visions,  as  they  are  from  theo- 
retical discussion.  They  are  collections  of  recipes  and  direc- 
tions which  are  supposed  at  least  to  be  practical  and  which 
are  written  in  a  simple  and  straightforward  style.  They 
are  not,  however,  taken  together,  by  any  means  entirely 
free  from  astrological  directions  or  belief  in  occult  virtue 
or  yet  other  superstition,  and  they  include  recipes  for  making 

*  For  these  works  see  Berthelot  medizinischen   Societat  in  Erlan- 

(1893),  III,  or  Lippmann   (1919),  gen,  XLIII    (1911)  ;   and  his  Die 

who  follows  him.    I  have  not  had  Alchemic     bet    den    Arabern,    in 

access    to    E.    Wiedemann,    Zur  Journal    fiir    praktische    Chetme, 

Chetnie     bei     den     Arabern, _    in  LXXVI  (1907),  85-87,  105-:^ 
Sitziingsberichte    der   physikalisch- 


Character 
of  Arabic 
alchemy. 


Different 
character 
of  our 
Latin 
treatises. 


764  MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap, 

gold.    Of  this  there  is  least  in  the  first  treatise  we  have  to 
consider. 
Compo-  The  Compositiones  ad  tingenda,^  a  treatise  or  collection 

fingenda.  °^  notes  and  recipes  preserved  in  a  manuscript  dating  from 
the  time  of  Charlemagne,  throws  some  light  on  the  tech- 
nical processes  preserved  in  the  Latin  west  in  the  early 
middle  ages  and  on  the  amount  of  knowledge  of  natural 
phenomena  preserved  in  connection  with  the  arts, — applied 
science  in  other  words.  It  tells  how  to  color  glass  and  make 
mosaics,  and  describes  a  glass  furnace;  how  to  dye  skins 
and  make  parchment;  how  to  make  gold-leaf,  gold-thread, 
silver-leaf  and  tin-leaf ;  how  to  give  copper  the  color  of  gold ; 
it  gives  various  directions  and  preparations  for  painting 
and  gilding;  and  a  description  of  various  minerals  and 
herbs  employed  in  the  above  processes.  Much  is  repeated 
that  is  found  already  in  Pliny  and  Dioscorides,  or  in  Aris- 
totle and  the  Greek  alchemists.  But  several  things  are  men- 
tioned, at  least  so  far  as  we  know,  for  the  first  time,  al- 
though Berthelot  believed  that  the  compiler  of  the  Composi- 
tiones ad  tingenda  had  copied  them  from  earlier  works, 
very  probably  Byzantine  or  late  Roman,  and  not  invented 
them  himself.  We  find  here  the  first  mention  of  vitriol 
and  of  "bronze," — a  word  apparently  derived  from  Brun- 
disium.  Amor  aquae  is  used  for  the  first  time  for  the  scum 
formed  on  waters  containing  iron  salts  and  other  metals, 
and  we  also  meet  the  first  instance  of  the  preparation  of 
cinnabar  by  means  of  sulphur  and  mercury.  The  work 
contains  very  little  superstition  with  the  exception  of  one 
passage  which  Berthelot  has  already  noted.^  Once  a  stone 
is  spoken  of  as  having  solar  virtue;  lead  is  distinguished 
as  masculine  and  feminine;  the  gall  of  a  tortoise  is  used 
in  a  composition  for  writing  golden  letters,  and  pig's  blood 

^  The  full  title  is  "Compositiones  Lucensium,  Arm.  I,  Cod.  L,  was 

ad  tingenda  musiva^  pelles  et  alia,  printed  in   Muratori,   Antiquitates 

ad   deaurandum   ferrum,   ad  min-  Italicae,  II    (1739),  364-87.     It  is 

eralia,     ad     chrysographiam,     ad  described  by  Berthelot    (1893),  I, 

glutina  quaedam  conficienda,  alia-  7-22,  whose  comparison  of  it  with 

que  artium  documenta."    The  MS,  previous  treatises  I  follow. 

Bibliotheca    capituli    canonicorum  'Berthelot  (1888),  I,  12.  note. 


XXXIII 


TREATISES  ON  THE  ARTS 


76s 


Mappe 
Clavicula, 


is  employed  in  another  connection.     But  these  are  trifling 
signs  of  occult  science. 

More  alchemistic  in  character  is  the  Mappe  Clavicula,^ 
which,  in  its  fuller  twelfth  century  form,  embodies  the 
Compositiones  ad  tingenda  in  a  different  order,^  and  adds 
about  twice  as  many  more  recipes  for  making  gold,  making 
colors,  writing  with  gold,  glues  and  various  other  matters, 
including  building  directions.  Berthelot  regarded  two  items 
instructing  how  to  make  images  of  the  gods  as  signs  of  an 
ancient  pagan  origin  for  the  work.^  One  of  these  items 
occurs  in  the  twelfth  century  text,  the  other  in  the  tenth 
century  table  of  contents.  On  the  other  hand  Berthelot 
believed  that  the  twelfth  century  version  contained  the  oldest 
directions  for  the  distillation  of  alcohol.^  The  Mappe 
Clavicula  adds  a  good  deal  that  is  of  a  superstitious  char- 
acter to  the  Compositiones  'ad  tingenda  which  it  includes, 
and  at  the  same  time  lays  considerable  stress  upon  experi- 
mental method. 

It  opens  with  a  recipe  "for  making  the  best  gold,"  the  Some  of 
first  of  a  long  series.  One  of  the  ingredients  in  this  case  'ts  recipes 
is  "a.  bit  of  moon-earth,  which  the  Greeks  call  Affroselimtm." 
The  third  recipe  advises  one  to  experiment  at  first  with 
only  a  little  of  the  compound  in  question,  until  one  learns 
the  process  more  thoroughly.^  The  ingredients  for  gold- 
making  in  the  sixth  recipe  include  the  gall  of  a  goat  and 
of  a  bull,  and  saffron  from  Lycia  or  Arabia,  which  is  to 
be  pounded  in  a  Theban  mortar  in  the  sun  in  dog- 
days.  At  the  close  of  the  fourteenth  recipe,  into  which 
the  gall  of  a  bull  again  enters  we  have  one  of  the  injunc- 
tions to  secrecy  so  dear  to  the  alchemist :  "Hide  the  sacred 
secret  which  should  be  transmitted  to  no  one,  nor  give  to 


*Text  and  some  discussion 
thereof  in  Archacologia,  XXXII 
(1847),  183-244.  Analyzed  by 
Berthelot  (1893),  I,  23-65.  On 
the  Schlestadt  MS  of  the  loth 
century,  see  Giry  in  Bibliothcque 
de  l'£cole  des  Haiites  Etudes, 
XXXV  (1878),  209-27. 

' See  recipes  105-93. 


'Berthelot    (1893),  I,  57. 

*  Ibid.,  61.  Others,  however, 
would  trace  the  discovery  of  alco- 
hol back  to  Hippolytus.  See 
above,  p.  468. 

'  "Accipies  ad  experimentum 
donee  primitus  discas  non  multum 
cum  semel  facias." 


766 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Question 
of  sym- 
bolic 

nomencla- 
ture. 


anyone  the  prophetic."  ^  It  is  also  implied  that  alchemy 
is  a  religious  or  divine  art  in  the  twentieth  recipe  where  it  is 
said  that  operators  should  concede  all  things  to  divine  works. 
But  such  mystic  allusions  are  infrequent  as  well  as  brief. 
In  the  same  twentieth  item  gold  is  supposed  to  be  made  from 
a  mixture  of  iron  rust,  magnet,  foreign  alum,  myrrh,  gold, 
and  wine.  It  is  also  stated  that  those  who  will  not  credit 
the  great  utility  that  there  is  in  humors  are  those  who  do 
not  make  demonstration  for  themselves,  another  instance 
of  the  experimental  character  of  the  work.  The  forty-first 
recipe  states  that  gold  may  be  dissolved  in  order  to  write 
with  it  by  dipping  it  in  the  blood  of  an  Indian  dragon, 
placing  it  in  a  glass  vessel,  and  surrounding  it  with  coals. 
In  the  sixty-ninth  item  the  blood  of  a  dragon  or  of  a  cock 
is  mixed  with  urine  and  the  stone  celidonhis.  The  gall  of 
a  bull  and  the  blood  of  a  pig  are  used  again  in  recipes  sixty- 
eight  and  one  hundred  and  twenty-eight. 

It  has  sometimes  been  contended,  chiefly  by  persons  who 
did  not  realize  how  universal  was  the  ascription  of  great 
virtue  to  the  parts  of  animals  in  ancient  and  medieval  science 
and  their  use  as  remedies  in  the  medicine  of  the  same  pe- 
riods, that  they  are  not  to  be  taken  literally  in  alchemical 
recipes  but  are  to  be  understood  symbolically  and  are  cryptic 
designations  for  common  mineral  substances.  Thus  Berthe- 
lot  cites  a  passage  from  the  Latin  De  anima,  ascribed  to 
Avicenna,  which  says,  "I  am  going  to  tell  you  a  secret :  the 
eye  of  a  man  or  bull  or  cow  or  deer  signifies  mercury,"  and 
so  on.^  But  despite  what  Berthelot  goes  on  to  say  about  the 
"old  prophetic  nomenclature"  of  the  Egyptians,  I  am  in- 
clined to  think  that  such  symbolism  is  mainly  a  refinement 
of  later  alchemists,  and  that  originally  most  such  expres- 
sions were  intended  literally.  Certainly  it  would  be  impos- 
sible to  explain  all  the  medicinal  use  of  parts  of  animals  in 
Pliny's  Natural  History  as  either  symbolic  or  derived  from 
the  Egyptian  priests.    Like  the  suggestion  that  Roger  Bacon 


*"Absconde     sanctum     et     nulli 
tradendum   secretum   neque  alicui 


dederis  propheta." 
'Berthelot  (1893),  I,  303-4. 


XXXIII 


TREATISES  ON  THE  ARTS 


767 


wrote  in  cipher,  the  symbolic  nomenclature  theory  is  based 
on  the  assumption  that  the  men  of  old  concealed  great 
secrets  under  an  appearance  of  error.  And  where  such 
cryptograms  and  symbols  were  employed,  it  was  almost 
invariably  done,  we  may  be  sure,  with  the  object  of  impress- 
ing the  reader  with  an  exaggerated  notion  of  the  importance 
of  what  was  written  rather  than  because  the  writer  really 
had  any  great  discovery  that  he  wished  to  conceal.  That 
symbolic  language  was  employed  by  alchemists,  especially 
in  the  latest  middle  age  and  early  modern  centuries,  is  not 
to  be  questioned.  The  use  of  the  names  of  the  planets  for 
the  corresponding  metals  is  a  familiar  example.  But  most 
such  symbolic  nomenclature  is  equally  obvious,  while  there 
is  no  reason  for  not  taking  the  use  of  parts  of  animals  liter- 
ally. Indeed,  in  many  passages  it  must  be  so  taken,  as  in  a 
later  item  of  the  Mappe  Clavicida  ^  which  has  no  concern 
with  alchemy  and  where  in  order  to  poison  an  arrow  for 
use  in  battle,  we  are  instructed  to  dip  it  in  the  sweat  from 
the  right  side  of  a  horse  between  the  hip-bones.  The  fol- 
lowing experiments  with  goats  also  illustrate  the  great  value 
set  upon  animal  fluids  and  substances. 

We  are  reminded  of  the  directions  given  by  Marcellus  Magical 
Empiricus  for  the  preparation  of  goat's  blood  by  a  recipe  Procedure 
for  making  figures  of  crystal  which  occurs  near  the  close 
of  the  Mappe  Claviada.^  A  he-goat  which  has  never  in- 
dulged in  sexual  intercourse  is  to  be  shut  up  in  a  cask  for 
three  days  until  he  has  completely  digested  everything  that  he 
had  in  his  belly.  He  is  then  to  be  fed  on  ivy  for  four  days, 
at  the  end  of  which  time  he  is  to  be  slain  and  his  blood  mixed 
with  his  urine  which  is  now  collected  from  the  cask.  By 
soaking  the  crystal  overnight  in  this  mixture  it  can  be 
moulded  or  carved  at  will.  This  experiment  is  immediately 
preceded  by  a  somewhat  similar  procedure  for  cutting  glass 
with  steel. ^  The  glass  is  to  be  softened  and  the  steel  is  to 
be  tempered  by  placing  them  either  in  the  milk  of  a  Saracen 


in  the 

Mappe 
Clavicula. 


'  Item  265. 
*  Item  290. 


'  Item  289, 


768 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Similar 
passages 
in  Her- 
aclius. 


And  The- 
ophilus. 


she-goat,  who  has  been  fed  upon  ivy  and  milked  by  scratch- 
ing her  udders  with  nettles,  or  in  the  lotion  of  a  small  girl 
of  ruddy  complexion,  which  must  be  taken  before  sunrise. 

Very  similar  passages  are  found  in  the  works  of  Hera- 
clius  and  Theophilus,  the  former  of  whom  gives  the  follow- 
ing directions  for  glass  engraving :  "Oh !  all  you  artists  who 
wish  to  engrave  glass  correctly,  now  I  will  show  you  just  as 
I  myself  have  proven.  I  sought  the  fat  worms  which  the 
plow  turns  up  from  the  earth,  and  the  useful  art  in  such 
matters  bade  me  at  the  same  time  seek  vinegar  and  the  hot 
blood  of  a  huge  he-goat,  which  I  had  taken  pains  to  tie  up 
under  cover  and  to  feed  on  strong  ivy  for  a  while.  Next  I 
mixed  the  worms  and  vinegar  with  the  warm  blood  and 
anointed  all  the  bright  shining  phial.  This  done,  I  tried  to 
engrave  the  glass  with  the  hard  stone  called  pyrites."  ^ 
In  another  passage  Heraclius  recommends  the  use  of  the 
urine  and  blood  of  a  goat  in  engraving  gems,^  and  he  also 
states  that  the  blood  of  a  goat  makes  crystal  easier  to  carve.^ 

Theophilus  states  that  poets  and  artificers  have  greatly 
cherished  the  ivy,  "because  they  recognized  the  occult 
powers  which  it  contains  within  itself."  ^  He  also  affirms 
that  the  blood  of  a  goat  makes  crystal  easier  to  carve,  but 
he  recommends  the  blood  of  a  living  goat  two  or  three  years 
old  and  repeated  Insertion  of  the  crystal  in  an  incision  be- 
tween the  animal's  breast  and  abdomen.^  He  also  recom- 
mends a  somewhat  similar  procedure  to  that  of  the  Mappe 
Clavicula  with  a  goat  and  a  cask.  ^  In  this  case  the  goat 
should  be  three  years  old,  and  after  being  bound  for  three 

temper   it,    for   this   blood   makes 


^De  coloribus  et  artibus  Ro- 
manorum,  I,  iv.  I  have  somewhat 
altered  Mrs.  Merrifield's  transla- 
tion (I,  i86). 

'Ibid.,  I,  xi;  Mrs.  Merrifield 
(1849),  I,  189-91. 

=•  Ibid.,  I,  xii : 
"Sed    vim    cristalli    cruor    antea 

temperet  hirci 
Sanguis  enim   facilem   ferro  facit 

hie  adamantem." 
Mrs.    Merrifield    (I,    194)    has   in- 
correctly   rendered    this    passage, 
"But  let  the  blood  of  a  goat  first 


the     iron     so     hard     that     even 
adamant  is  soft  compared  to  it." 
What  Heraclius  says  is, 
"But  first  let  the  blood  of  a  he- 
goat   temper  the   force  of   the 
crystal. 
For    this   blood    makes   adamant 

soft  to  the  iron." 
*  Schcdula    diversarum    artium, 
III,  98. 
°  Ibid.,  Ill,  94- 
Ubid.,  Ill,  21. 


XXXIII 


TREATISES  ON  THE  ARTS 


76Q 


days  without  food  should  be  fed  for  two  days  on  nothing 
but  fern.  The  following  night  he  should  be  shut  up  in  a 
cask  with  holes  in  the  bottom  through  which  his  urine  can 
be  collected  in  another  vessel  for  two  or  three  nights,  when 
the  goat  may  be  released  and  the  urine  employed  to  temper 
iron  tools.  Or  the  urine  of  a  small  red-headed  boy  may  be 
employed,  as  it  is  better  for  tempering  than  plain  water. 
Indeed,  both  Theophilus  and  Heraclius  make  much  use  of 
parts  of  animals  in  the  arts :  various  animals'  teeth  to  shine 
and  polish  things  with,  horse  dung  mixed  with  clay,  skins 
and  bladders,  saliva  and  ear-wax  to  polish  niello,  and  so 
forth. 

Returning  to  the  Mappe  Clcwicida  we  note  the  employ- 
ment of  a  magic  figure  called  arragah,  which  Berthelot 
thinks  is  a  small  lead  image.^  By  means  of  it  the  flow  of  a 
spring  may  be  stopped ;  a  cup  may  be  made  either  to  retain 
or  to  empty  its  contents;  if  the  cows  drink  first  from  the 
trough,  there  will  be  enough  water  for  both  the  cows  and 
the  horses,  but  if  the  horses  drink  first,  there  will  not  be 
enough  for  either.  The  same  figure  enables  one  to  fill  a 
pitcher  from  a  cask  without  diminishing  the  amount  of 
liquid  in  the  cask,  or  to  construct  a  lamp  which  will  pro- 
duce phantoms.  It  also  makes  soldiers  leave  their  camp 
without  their  spears  and  yet  return  with  them.  After  this 
flight  into  the  realm  of  magic  we  come  back  to  a  more 
plausibly  physical  basis  for  marvels  in  a  description  of  four 
revolving  hoops  or  circles  within  which  a  vessel  may  be  re- 
volved in  any  direction  without  spilling  its  contents.^ 

The  passages  which  we  have  just  noted  in  the  Mappe 
Cla/mcula  cannot  be  surely  traced  back  earlier  than  the 
twelfth  century  version  of  it  and  do  not  appear  in  the  table 
of  contents  which  is  preserved  in  the  tenth  century  Schle- 
stadt  manuscript  and  which  covers  only  a  portion  of  the 
chapters  of  the  twelfth  century  manuscript,  but  also  some 


'  Berthelot  (1893),  I,  63.  His 
French  translation  omits  some  of 
the  Latin  text  as  published  in 
Archaeologia,  cap.  288. 


'  "Cardan's    concentric    circles," 
according  to  Berthelot   (1893),  I, 


A  magic 
figure. 


Use  of  an 
incanta- 
tion in 
tenth 
century 
alchemy. 


770 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Experi- 
mental 
character 
of  the 
work  of 
Theophi- 
lus. 


How  to 
make 
Spanish 
gold. 


other  chapters  which  are  not  extant.  But  that  magic  was 
not  entirely  absent  from  the  earlier  version  to  which  this 
table  of  contents  seems  to  apply  is  evidenced  by  the  fact 
that  one  of  the  chapter  headings  dealing  with  the  fabrica- 
tion of  gold  mentions  a  prayer  or  incantation  to  be  recited 
during  the  process.^ 

The  great  importance  of  the  work  of  Theophilus  in  the 
history  of  art  is  too  generally  recognized  to  need  elabora- 
tion here.  Our  purpose  is  rather  to  point  out  that  in  it  in- 
formation of  great  value  is  found  side  by  side  with  a  con- 
siderable amount  of  misguided  natural  theory  and  magical 
ceremony.  The  stress  laid  by  Theophilus  upon  personal  ob- 
servation, experience,  and  experimental  method  should  not, 
however,  pass  unnoticed.  He  has  scrutinized  the  works  of 
art  in  the  church  of  St.  Sophia  one  by  one  "with  diligent  ex- 
perience," has  tested  everything  by  eye  and  hand,  has  as  a 
"curious  explorer"  made  all  sorts  of  experiments,  and  ap- 
pears to  represent  transparent  stained  glass  as  his  own  dis- 
covery or  idea.^  Nor  is  he  the  only  experimenter;  he  also 
speaks  of  "modern  workmen"  who  deceive  many  incautious 
persons  by  their  imitation  of  the  appearance  of  most  precious 
Arabian  gold  which  "is  frequently  found  employed  in  the 
most  ancient  vases. ^ 

Theophilus,  however,  believes  that  other  metals  can 
really  be  transmuted  into  gold,  and  we  may  repeat  his  amus- 
ing account  of  how  Spanish  gold  "is  made  from  red  copper 


*Berthelot  (1893),  I,  55- 
'II,  prologus  (closing  passage). 
"Huius  ergo  imitator  desiderans 
fore,  apprehendi  atrium  agiae 
Sophiae  conspicorque  cellulam 
diversorum  colorum  omnimodo 
varietate  refertam  et  monstran- 
tem  singulorum  utilitatem  ac 
naturam.  Quo  mox  inobservato 
pede  ingressus,  replevi  armario- 
lum  cordis  mei  sufficienter  ex 
omnibus,  quae  diligenti  experi- 
entia  sigillatim_  perscrutatus, 
cuncta  visu  manibusque  probata 
satis  lucide  tuo  studio  commen- 
davi      absque       invidia.       Verum 


quoniam  huiusmodi  picturae  usus 
perspicax  non  valet  esse,  quasi 
curiosus  explorator  omnibus 
modis  elaboravi  cognoscere,  quo 
artis  ingenio  et  colorum  varietas 
opus  decoraret,  et  lucem  diei  so- 
lisque  radios  non  repelleret.  Huic 
exercitio  dans  operam  vitri  natu- 
ram comprehendo,  eiusque  solius 
usu  et  varietate  id  effici  posse 
considero,  quod  artificium,  sicut 
visum  et  auditum  didici,  studio 
tuo  indagare  curavi."  Ilg's  Latin 
text  (1874). 
Mil,  47. 


XXXIII  TREATISES  ON  THE  ARTS  771 

and  powdered  basilisk  and  human  blood  and  vinegar."  "For 
the  Gentiles,  whose  skill  in  this  art  is  well  known,  create 
basilisks  in  this  wise.  They  have  an  underground  chamber 
completely  walled  in  on  all  sides  with  stone,  and  with  two 
windows  so  small  as  scarcely  to  admit  any  light.  In  thig 
they  put  two  cocks  of  twelve  or  fifteen  years  and  give  them 
plenty  of  food.  These,  when  they  have  grown  fat,  from 
the  heat  of  their  fat  have  commerce  together  and  lay  eggs. 
As  soon  as  the  eggs  are  laid  the  cocks  are  ejected  and  toads 
are  put  in  to  sit  on  the  eggs  and  are  fed  upon  bread.  When 
the  eggs  are  hatched  chicks  come  forth  who  look  like  young 
roosters,  but  after  seven  days  they  grow  serpents'  tails  and 
would  straightway  burrow  into  the  ground,  were  the  cham- 
ber not  paved  with  stone.  Guarding  against  this,  their 
masters  have  round  brazen  vessels  of  great  amplitude,  perfo- 
rated on  all  sides,  with  narrow  mouths,  in  which  they  put  the 
chicks  and  close  the  mouths  with  copper  covers  and  bury 
them  underground,  and  the  chicks  are  nourished  for  six 
months  by  the  subtle  earth  which  enters  through  the  perfo- 
rations. After  this  they  uncover  them  and  apply  a  strong 
fire  until  the  beasts  within  are  totally  consumed.  When  this 
is  over  and  it  has  cooled  off,  they  remove  and  carefully  pul- 
verize them,  adding  a  third  part  of  the  blood  of  a  ruddy 
man,  which  blood  is  dried  and  powdered.  Having  com- 
pounded these  two  they  temper  them  with  strong  vinegar 
in  a  clean  vessel ;  then  they  take  very  thin  plates  of  the  purest 
red  copper  and  spread  this  mixture  over  them  on  both  sides 
and  place  them  in  the  fire.  And  when  they  grow  white  hot, 
they  take  them  out  and  quench  and  wash  them  in  the  same 
mixture,  and  this  process  they  repeat  until  the  mixture  has 
eaten  through  the  copper,  and  so  obtain  the  weight  and  color 
of  gold.     This  gold  is  suited  for  all  operations."  ^ 

Mr.  Hendrie  held  that  Theophilus  was  here  describing 
in  symbolic  language  a  process  "for  procuring  pure  gold  by 
the  means  of  the  mineral  acids;"  and  that  "the  toads  of 

*  I    have    followed    Ilg's   rather  than  Hendrie's  text ;  III,  48. 


172 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


The  ques- 
tion of 
symbolic 
termi- 
nology 
again. 


Alchemy 
in  the 
eleventh 
century. 


Theophilus  which  hatch  the  eggs  are  probably  fragments  of 
the  mineral  salt,  nitrate  of  potash;  .  .  .  the  blood  of  a 
red  man  .  .  .  probably  a  nitrate  of  ammonia;  fine  earth,  a 
muriate  of  soda  (common  salt)  ;  the  cocks,  the  sulphates  of 
copper  and  iron;  the  eggs,  gold  ore;  the  hatched  chickens, 
which  require  a  stone  pavement,  sulphuric  acid  produced  by 
burning  these  in  a  stone  vessel,  collecting  the  fumes.  .  .  . 
The  elements  of  nitro-muriatic  acid  are  all  here,  the  solvent 
for  gold."  ^  Mr.  Hendrie  leaves,  however,  a  number  of  de- 
tails unexplained  and  he  admits  that  "Unfortunately  each 
chemist  appears  to  have  varied  the  symbols  in  use."  Cer- 
tainly one  would  have  to  vary  them  in  almost  every  case 
to  make  any  sense  out  of  such  procedures  as  this  of  Theoph- 
ilus. On  the  other  hand,  there  is  nothing  very  surprising 
in  his  procedure  taken  literally  to  one  who  is  acquainted 
with  the  beliefs  of  ancient  and  medieval  science  and  magic. 
And  certainly  Shakespeare's  line  concerning  the  precious 
jewel  in  the  toad's  head,  which  Hendrie  quotes  in  this  con- 
nection, is  much  more  likely  to  be  meant  literally  than  to  be 
the  symbolic  "jargon  of  the  alchemist."  Later  we  shall  hear 
again  from  Alexander  Neckam,  in  a  passage  which  has  no 
connection  with  alchemy,  of  the  basilisk  hatched  by  a  toad 
from  an  ^gg  laid  by  a  cock,  and  we  shall  hear  from  Albertus 
Magnus  of  an  experiment  in  which  a  toad's  eye  was  proved 
superior  in  virtue  to  an  emerald. 

The  treatises  which  we  have  been  considering  appear, 
at  least  for  the  most  part,  to  antedate  the  Latin  translations 
of  works  of  alchemy  from  the  Arabic,  although  it  is  pos- 
sible that,  just  as  the  first  translations  of  mathematical  and 
astronomical  works  from  the  Arabic  go  back  to  the  tenth 
century  at  least,  so  the  reception  of  Arabic  alchemy  may 
have  begun  in  a  small  way  before  the  twelfth  century.  At 
any  rate  we  find  that  in  the  eleventh  century  not  only  were 
Michael  Psellus  and  other  Byzantine  scholars  spreading  the 
doctrines  of  alchemy,  ^  but  a  scholium  to  Adam  of  Bremen 


'Hendrie  (1847),  pp.  432-3- 

'Ernst  von  Meyer,  History  of  Chemistry,  1906. 


XXXIII 


TREATISES  ON  THE  ARTS 


773 


records  the  presence  at  the  court  of  Bishop  Adalbert  of 
Bremen  of  an  alchemist  in  the  person  of  a  baptized  Jew.^ 

To  St.  Dunstan,  the  famous  abbot  of  Glastonbury,  arch- 
bishop of  Canterbury,  and  statesman  of  the  tenth  century 
(924  or  925  to  988),  is  attributed  a  treatise  on  the  philoso- 
pher's stone  contained  in  a  Corpus  Christi  manuscript  of 
the  fifteenth  century  at  Oxford  and  printed  at  Cassel  in  1649. 
No  genuine  works  by  him  seem  to  be  extant,  however,  but 
it  is  interesting  to  note  that  along  with  his  reputation  for 
learning  and  mechanical  skill  went  the  association  of  Jiis 
name  with  magic.  In  his  studious  youth  he  was  accused 
of  magic,  driven  from  court,  and  thrown  into  a  muddy  pond. 
His  contemporary  biographer  also  narrates  how  the  devil 
appeared  to  him  in  various  animal  and  other  terrifying 
forms.  His  favorite  studies  were  mathematics  and  music, 
and  he  was  said  to  own  a  magic  harp  which  played  while 
hanging  by  itself  on  the  wall.^ 

Berthelot  has  associated  the  introduction  of  Arabic  al- 
chemy into  Christian  western  Europe  with  the  Latin  trans- 
lation by  Robert  of  Chester  of  The  Book  of  Moricnus,  but 
incorrectly  dated  it  in  1182  A.  D.,^  whereas  the  mention  of 
that  date  in  the  manuscripts  has  reference  to  the  Spanish 
era  and  denotes  the  year  1144  A.  D.^  The  main  reason  for 
regarding  Robert's  translation  as  one  of  the  earliest  is 
that  he  remarks  in  his  preface,  "What  alchemy  is  and  what 
is  its  composition,  your  Latin  world  does  not  yet  know 
truly."  Of  the  work  translated  by  Robert  we  shall  treat  more 
fully  in  a  later  chapter  on  Hermetic  Books  in  the  Middle 
Ages.     Here  we  may  further  note  the  existence  of  a  work 


*Migne,  PL  146,  583-4.  Some 
accused  the  bishop  of  resort  to 
magic  arts :  Ibid.,  606. 

/W.  Stubbs,  in  RS  LXIII,  p. 
cix.  C.  L.  Barnes,  Science  m 
Early  England,  in  Smithsonian 
Report  for  1895,  p.  732.  Of  the 
alchemy  ascribed  to  Dunstan, 
Elias  Ashmole  remarked  in  his 
Theatrum  Chemicum  Britanni- 
cum,  1652,  "He  who  shall  have 
the   happinass   to   meet   with   St- 


Dunstan's  work  De  occulta  phi- 
losophia  .  .  .  may  therein  read 
such  stories  as  will  make  him 
amazed  to  think  what  stupendous 
and  immense  things  are  to  be  per- 
formed by  virtue  of  the  Philoso- 
pher's Mercury,  of  which  a  taste 
only  and  no  more." 

'Berthelot    (1893),    I,  234. 

*  Karpinski  (1915),  pp.  26-30; 
Haskins,  EHR,  XXX  (1915), 
62-5. 


St.  Dunstan 
and 

alchemy 
and  magic. 


Introduc- 
tion of 
Arabic 
alchemy 
in  the 
twelfth 
century. 


774   MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE   chap,  xxxiii 

of  alchemy  in  another  twelfth  century  manuscript.^  It  is  a 
brief  work  in  four  chapters  and  its  superstitious  character 
may  be  inferred  from  its  opening  instruction  to  "take  four 
hundred  hen's  eggs  laid  in  the  month  of  March,"  and  its 
citation  of  Artesius  concerning  divination  by  the  reflection 
or  refraction  of  the  sun's  rays  or  moon-beams  in  liquids  or 
a  mirror.  Since  the  treatise  bears  the  title  Alchamia,  it  is 
probably  safe  to  assume  that  it  represents  Arabic  influence. 

*  Berlin  956,  12th  century,  "Hie  titles   of   the   last   three   chapters 

incipit    alchamia.      Accipe    CCCC  are,   "de  iiii   ollis,   de   cognitione, 

ova  gauline  que  generata  sunt  et  de     observatione     stestarum."     I 

facta  in  mense  martii  .../...  have  not  seen  the  MS  but  follow 

ut  recentiora  sint  semper  et  calidi-  Rose's    description    in   the   Berlin 

era.      Explicit     alchamia."     The  MSS  catalogue. 


CHAPTER  XXXIV 

MARBOD,   BISHOP  OF   RENNES,    IO35-II23 

Career  of  Marbod — Relation  of  his  Liber  lapidum  to  the  prose 
Evax — Problem  of  Marbod's  sources — Influence  of  the  Liber  lapidum 
— Occult  virtue  of  gems — Liber  lapidum  meant  seriously — De  fato  ei 
genesi. 

"Nec  duhium  cuiquam  debet  falsumque  videri 
Quin  sua  sit  gemmis  divinitus  insita  virtus; 
Ingens  est  herbis  virtus  data,  maxima  gemmis." 

— Marbod,  Liber  lapidum. 

Of  medieval  Latin  Lapidaries  the  earliest  and  what  also  Career  of 
seems  to  have  been  the  classic  on  the  subject  of  the  marvel- 
ous properties  of  stones  is  the  Liber  lapidum  seu  de  gemmis 
by  Marbod,  bishop  of  Rennes/  who  lived  from  1035  to  1123 
and  so  had  very  likely  completed  this  work  before  the  close 
of  the  eleventh  century.  Indeed  one  manuscript  of  it  seems 
to  date  from  that  century  ^  and  there  are  numerous  twelfth 
century  manuscripts.  These  early  manuscripts  bear  his 
name  and  the  style  is  the  same  as  in  his  other  writings. 
Born  in  the  county  of  Anjou,  Marbod  attended  the  church 

^  I    have    used    the    edition    of  age,  Paris,  1882.   C.  W.  King,  The 

Marbod's    poems    in    Migne,    PL  Natural     History,     Ancient     and 

vol.    171,    which    also    contains    a  -Modern,   of  Precious  Stones  and 

life  of   Marbod.     Two   secondary  Gems,  London,  1865. 

accounts  of  Marbod  are  C.  Ferry,  ^  CLM  23479,  nth  century,  fols. 

De  Marbodi  Rhedonensis  Episcopi  4-10,  Carmina  de  lapidibus  eadem 

vita      et      carminibus,      Nemansi,  quae  Marbodo  tribuuntur  sed  alio 

1877;  L.  V.  E.  Ernault,  Marbode,  ordine.     Of    CUL   768,    15th   cen- 

£veque  de  Rennes,  Sa  vie  et  ses  tury,    fols.    67-80,    "Marbodi   liber 

CEuvres,  in   Bull,   et  Mem.   de   la  lapidum,"     the     Catalogue     says, 

Societe    Archeologique    du    dept.  "This  Latin  poem  has  been  often 

d'llle-et-Vilaine,      XX,      1-260,  printed  but  it  does  not  appear  that 

Rennes,   1889.     See  also  V.  Rose,  the  editors  have  collated  this  MS. 

Aristoteles     De     Lapidibus     und  The  order  of  the  sections  is  differ- 

Arnoldus    Saxo,     in     Zeitsch.     f.  ent  from  all  those  of  which  Beck- 

deutsches    Alterthum,    XVIII  mann  speaks  in  his  edition   (Got- 

(187s),  p.  321,  et  seq.;  L.  Pannier,  tingen,  1799),  answering,  however, 

Les  lapidaires  fran^ais  du  moycn  most  nearly  to  his  own." 

775 


71^ 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Relation 
of  the 
Liber 
tapidum  to 
the  prose 
Evax. 


school  there,  became  the  schoolmaster  himself  from  1067 
to  1 08 1,  during  which  time  he  probably  composed  the  Liher 
lapidutn,  then  served  as  archdeacon  under  three  successive 
bishops,  and  finally  himself  became  a  bishop  in  1096.  He 
attended  church  councils  in  1103  and  1104  and  died  in  Sep- 
tember, 1 123,  in  an  Angevin  monastery,  whose  monks  is- 
sued a  eulogistic  encyclical  letter  on  that  occasion,  while 
two  archdeacons  celebrated  his  integrity,  learning,  and  elo- 
quence in  admiring  verse.  Marbod's  own  productions  are 
also  in  poetical  form.  It  is  interesting  to  note  that  despite 
his  early  date  he  was  eulogized  not  as  a  lone  man  of  letters 
in  an  uncultured  age  but  as  "the  king  of  orators,  although 
at  that  time  all  Gaul  resounded  with  varied  studies." 

The  Liber  lapidum  is  a  Latin  poem  of  734  hexameters 
describing  sixty  stones.    In  the  opening  lines  Marbod  writes  : 

"Evax,  king  of  the  Arabs,  is  said  to  have  written  to  Nero, 

Who  after  Augustus  ruled  next  in  the  city.^ 

How  many  the  species  of  stones,  what  names,  and  what 

colors, 
From  what  regions  they  came,  and  how  great  the  power 

of  each  one." 

Making  use  of  this  worthy  book,  Marbod  has  decided  to 
compose  a  briefer  account  for  himself  and  a  few  friends 
only,  believing  that  he  who  popularizes  mysteries  lessens 
their  majesty.  As  a  result  of  this  opening  line  and  the  fact 
that  in  some  manuscripts  Marbod's  own  name  is  not  given, 
his  poem  is  sometimes  listed  in  the  catalogues  as  the  work 
of  Evax.^    There  is  also,  however,  extant  a  work  in  Latin 


*The  full  name  of  Tiberius 
was,  of  course,  Tiberius  Claudius 
Nero  Caesar. 

"  Library  of  Dukes  of  Bur- 
gundy 8890,  I2th  century,  Evacis 
regis.  BN  2621,  12th  and  15th 
centuries,  #6,  Poemation  de  gem- 
mis  cuius  author  dicitur  Evax, 
Rex   Arabiae. 

Montpellior  277,  Liber  lapidum 
preciosorum    Evax   rex  Arabum. 


Riccard.  1228,  12th  century,  fols. 
41-54;  Incipit  prologus  Evacis 
regis  Arabic  ad  Neronem  Ty- 
berium  de  lapidibus.  Incipit  lapi- 
darius  Evacis  habens  nomina 
gemmarum  Ix. 

BL  Hatton  76  contains  two  let- 
ters of  Evax,  king  of  the  Arabs, 
to  Tiberius  Caesar,  on  the  virtues 
of  stones,  according  to  Cockayne 
(1864),  I.  xc  and  Ixxxiv. 


XXXIV  MARBOD  jjy 

prose  which  opens,  "Evax,  king  of  Arabia,  to  the  emperor 
Tiberius  greeting."  ^  But  as  this  prose  work  is  not  much 
longer  than  Marbod's  poem,  and  seems  to  be  known  only 
from  a  single  manuscript  of  the  fourteenth  century,  it  is 
doubtful  if  it  is  the  work  which  he  professed  to  abbreviate. 
This  prose  work  is  also  ascribed  to  Amigeron  or  Dami- 
geron,^  to  whom  we  have  already  seen  that  the  author  of 
Lithica  was  supposed  to  be  indebted  and  whose  name  was 
regarded  as  that  of  a  famous  magician.  After  alluding  to 
the  magnificent  gifts  which  the  emperor  had  sent  to  Evax 
by  the  centurion  Lucinius  Fronto  and  offering  this  book  in 
return,  the  author  of  the  prose  version  lists  seven  stones  ap- 
propriate, not,  strangely  enough,  to  the  seven  planets,  but  to 
seven  of  the  signs  of  the  zodiac.^  Fifty  chapters  are  then 
devoted  to  as  many  stones,  beginning  with  Aetites,  which 
is  twenty-fifth  in  Marbod's  list,  and  ending  with  Sardo, 
while  Sardiiis  comes  tenth  in  Marbod's  poem.  Marbod's 
own  order,  however,  sometimes  varies  in  the  manuscripts.* 

King,  and  Rose  after  him,  asserted  '^  that  despite  Marbod's    Problem 
professed  abridgement  of  a  work  which  Evax  was  supposed   Marbod's 
to  have  presented  to  Tiberius,  he  drew  largely  from  Isidore   sources. 
of  Seville's  Etymologies.     Rose  thought  that  some  of  the 
descriptions  of  stones  were   from   Solinus,  the  rest   from 
Isidore,  but  that  the  account  of  their  virtues  was  from  Evax. 
King  also  noted  occasional  extracts  from  the  Orphic  work, 
Lithica,  which  is  not  surprising  in  view  of  the  fact  that  both 
Evax  and  the  Lithica  seem  based  on   Damigeron.     This 
question  of  sources  and  ultimate  origins  is,  however,  as  usual 
of  relatively  little  moment  to  our  investigation.     My  own 
impression  would  be  that  in  antiquity  and  the  middle  age 

*  Printed    by    J.    B.    Pitra,    III  that   this    may   be    derived    from 

(1855),  324-35-  Marbod    rather    than    even    from 

^  BN    7418,    14th    century,     fol.  the  earlier  and  fuller  work  which 

116-,      (D)amigeronis     peritissimi  he  is  supposed  to  have  used. 

de    lapidibus.      Since    this    is    the  ^  Namely,    Leo,    Cancer,    Aries, 

sole  MS  known  of  the  prose  ver-  Sagittarius,    Taurus,    Virgo,    and 

sion    (Rose,    1875,  p.   326)    and  is  Capricorn, 

of  the   14th  century,   whereas  we  *  See  page  775,  note  2. 

have    numerous     early    MSS    of  °  King  (1865),  p.  7;  Rose  (1875), 

Marbod's    poem,    it    would    seem  p.  335. 


778 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Influence 
of  the 
Liber 
lapidum. 


Occult 
virtue 
of  gems. 


there  exists  a  sort  of  common  fund  of  information  and 
stock  of  beliefs  concerning  gems  which  naturally  is  drawn 
upon  and  appears  in  every  individual  treatise  upon  them. 
But  the  number  of  gems  discussed  and  the  order  in  which 
they  are  considered  or  classified  varies  with  each  new  author, 
and  there  is  apt  to  be  a  similar  variation  in  the  number  of 
statements  made  concerning  any  particular  stone  and  the 
way  in  which  these  are  arranged.  In  fine,  all  ancient  and 
medieval  accounts  of  the  natures  and  virtues  of  stones  bear  a 
general  resemblance  to  one  another  which  is  more  impressive 
than  is  the  similarity  between  any  two  given  accounts,  and 
testify  to  a  consensus  of  opinion  and  to  a  common  learned 
tradition  concerning  gems  which  is  more  significant  than  the 
possible  borrowings  of  individual  authors  from  one  another. 

However,  there  seems  to  be  little  doubt  that  the  poem  of 
Marbod  is  itself  an  outstanding  work  among  medieval  ac- 
counts of  precious  stones,  first  because  of  the  early  date  of 
its  authorship,  and  second  because  of  its  late  persistence  and 
popularity,  which  is  indicated  by  the  fourteen  editions  that 
appeared  after  the  invention  of  printing.^  Its  convenient 
form  perhaps  accounts  to  a  considerable  extent  for  its  popu- 
larity. At  any  rate  the  manuscripts  of  it  are  numerous,  and 
it  was  much  used  by  subsequent  writers  of  the  twelfth  and 
thirteenth  centuries,  although  citations  of  Lapidaritis  cannot 
always  be  assumed  to  refer  to  Marbod.  But  at  least  the  no- 
tions concerning  gems  which  we  find  in  his  poem  are  a  fair 
sample  of  what  we  should  find  in  any  Latin  treatment  of 
the  same  subject  for  several  centuries  to  come.  It  is  found 
also  in  a  medieval  French  version. 

It  does  not  make  much  difference  where  we  begin  or 
what  stones  we  select  from  Marbod's  list  as  examples,  since 
the  same  sort  of  marvelous  powers  are  ascribed  to  all  of 
them.  In  his  prologue  Marbod  describes  the  occult  virtues 
of  gems  as  those  "whose  hidden  cause  gives  manifest  ef- 
fects."    No  one  should  doubt  them  or  think  them  false, 


*  Ferry  (1887),  p.  69. 


XXXIV  MARBOD  779 

"since  the  virtue  in  gems  is  divinely  implanted.  Enormous 
virtue  is  given  to  herbs,  but  the  greatest  to  gems." 

Adamant,  hard  as  it  is,  cracks  when  heated  v^ith  goat's 
blood.  It  counteracts  the  action  of  the  magnet.  It  is  used 
in  the  magic  arts  and  makes  its  bearer  indomitable.  It 
drives  off  nocturnal  specters  and  idle  dreams.  It  routs  black 
venom,  heals  quarrels  and  contentions,  cures  the  insane,  and 
repels  fierce  foes. 

Allectory,  found  inside  cocks,  slakes  thirst.  Milo  over- 
came other  athletes,  and  kings  have  won  battles  by  its  aid. 
It  restores  promptly  those  who  have  been  banished,  enables 
orators  to  speak  with  a  flow  of  language,  makes  one  welcome 
on  every  occasion,  and  endears  a  wife  to  her  husband.  It 
is  advised  to  carry  it  concealed  in  the  mouth. 

The  sapphire  nourishes  the  body  and  preserves  the  limbs 
whole.  Its  bearer,  who  should  be  most  chaste,  cannot  be 
harmed  by  fraud  or  envy  and  is  unmoved  by  any  terror.  It 
leads  those  in  bonds  from  prison.  It  placates  God  and  makes 
Him  favorable  to  prayers.  It  is  good  for  peace-making  and 
reconciliation.  It  is  preferred  to  other  gems  in  hydromancy, 
since  prophetic  responses  can  be  obtained  by  it.  As  for 
medicinal  qualities,  it  cools  internal  heat,  checks  perspiration, 
powdered  and  applied  with  milk  it  heals  ulcers,  cleanses  the 
eyes,  stops  headache,  and  cures  diseases  of  the  tongue. 

Gagates,  worn  as  an  amulet,  benefits  dropsy;  diluted 
with  water,  it  prevents  loose  teeth  from  falling  out ;  fumiga- 
tion with  it  is  good  for  epileptics  and  it  is  thought  to  be 
hostile  to  demons ;  it  remedies  indigestion  and  constipation 
and  overcomes  magical  illusions  (praestigia)  and  evil  incan- 
tations.    Also 

Per  suffumigium  mulieri  menstrua  reddit 

Et  solet,  ut  perhibent,  deprehendere  virginitatem. 

Praegnans  potest  aquam  triduo  qua  mersus  habetur 

Quo  vexabatur  partum  cito  libera  fundit. 
Gagates  burns  when  washed  with  water ;  is  extinguished  by 
anointing  it  with  olive  oil 


78o 


MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE       chap. 


Liber 
lapidum 
was  meant 
to  be 
taken 
seriously. 


The  magnet  is  especially  used  in  the  illusions  of  magic. 
The  great  Deendor  is  said  to  have  first  used  it,  realizing 
that  there  was  no  more  potent  force  in  magic,  and  after  him 
the  famous  witch  Circe  employed  it.  Among  the  Medes  ex- 
perience revealed  still  further  virtues  of  the  stone.  It  is 
used  to  test  a  wife's  chastity  while  she  is  sleeping;  if  she 
is  unchaste,  she  will  fall  out  of  bed  when  the  gem  is  applied 
to  her  head.  A  burglar  can  commit  theft  unmolested  by 
sprinkling  it  over  hot  coals  and  so  driving  away  all  the  oc- 
cupants of  the  house. 

In  the  case  of  Chelonitis  Marbod's  account  is  very  simi- 
lar to  that  in  Pliny's  Natural  History,^  citing  the  Magi  for 
the  power  of  divination  it  bestows  when  carried  under  the 
tongue  at  certain  times  of  the  moon,  according  to  whose 
phases  its  power  varies.  Of  the  gems  hitherto  described  only 
in  the  case  of  adamant  and  gagates  was  there  any  resem- 
blance between  Marbod  and  Pliny  and  there  only  partial. 

Pliny  also  briefly  states  that  the  stone  diadochos  re- 
sembles beryl,  but  does  not  have  Marbod's  statements  that  it 
is  employed  in  water  divination  to  show  varied  images  of 
demons,  "nor  is  there  other  stone  stronger  to  evoke  shades." 
But  if  by  chance  it  comes  in  contact  with  a  corpse,  it  loses 
its  wonted  force,  since  the  stone  is  sacred  and  abhors  dead 
bodies.^ 

The  vast  powers,  not  only  medicinal  and  physical,  but 
of  divination  and  magic,  over  the  mind  and  affections,  mirac- 
ulous and  supernatural,  even  over  God,  as  in  the  statement 
that  the  sapphire  can  be  employed  to  secure  a  more  favor- 
able answer  to  prayer,  which  Marbod  assigns  to  gems  with- 
out a  sign  of  scruple  or  scepticism  or  disapproval  on  his 
part,  have  so  shocked  some  moderns  that  suggestions  have 
been  made,  in  order  to  explain  away  the  acceptance  of  talis- 
manic  powers  of  gems  to  such  a  degree  by  a  Christian  clerj^- 
man  who  became  a  bishop,  that  Marbod  must  have  com- 


*  NH  XXXVI,  56.  Pliny,  how- 
ever, makes  these  statements 
about  chelonia  and  not  chelonitis 
which  follows  it. 


'The  stones  which  I  have  taken 
as  examples  are  numbers  1,  3,  5, 
18,  19,  39,  and  57  respectively. 


XXXIV  MARBOD  781 

posed  his  poem  when  quite  young  and  lived  to  repent  it,  or 
that  he  regarded  it  merely  as  a  poetical  flight  and  exercise, 
not  as  an  exposition  of  scientific  fact.  But  wherefore  then 
was  it  not  only  widely  read  in  the  literary  twelfth  century 
but  also  widely  cited  as  an  authority  in  the  scientific  and 
equally  Christian  thirteenth  century?  No;  everyone  else 
took  it  precisely  as  Marbod  meant  it,  as  a  serious  statement 
of  the  marvelous  powers  which  had  been  divinely  implanted 
in  gems.  And  why  should  not  God  be  more  easily  reached 
through  the  instrumentality  of  gems,  since  He  had  endowed 
them  with  their  marvelous  virtues?  Marbod  affirms  his 
own  faith  in  the  great  virtues  of  gems  not  only  at  the  be- 
ginning but  the  close  of  his  poem,  stating  that  while  some 
have  doubted  the  marvelous  properties  attributed  to  them, 
this  has  been  due  to  the  fact  that  so  many  imitation  gems 
are  made  of  glass,  which  deceive  the  unwary  but  of  course 
lack  the  occult  virtues  of  the  genuine  stones.  If  the  stones 
are  genuine  and  duly  consecrated,  the  marvelous  effects  will 
without  a  doubt  follow.  d   f  t 

Marbod's  belief  in  the  almost  boundless  talismanic  vir-  genesi. 
tues  of  gems  is  thrown  into  the  higher  relief  by  the  fact 
that  in  another  of  his  poems  he  makes  an  attack  upon  ge- 
nethlialogy  or  the  prediction  of  the  entire  life  of  the  individ- 
ual from  the  constellations  at  his  birth.  In  De  fato  et  genesi 
he  writes  against  "the  common  notion"  (opinio  vidgi)  that 
all  things  are  ruled  by  fate,  that  the  hour  of  nativity  con- 
trols man's  entire  life,  and  the  contention  of  the  mathematici 
that  the  seven  planets  control  not  only  the  external  forces 
with  which  man  comes  in  contact  but  also  human  character. 
He  objects  to  such  a  doctrine  as  that,  when  Venus  and  Mars 
appear  in  certain  relations  to  the  sun,  the  babe  born  under 
that  constellation  will  be  destined  to  commit  incest  and  adul- 
tery in  later  life.  He  objects  that  such  beliefs  destroy  all 
the  foundations  of  morality,  law,  and  future  reward  or 
punishment;  contends  that  there  are  certain  races  which 
never  commit  adultery  or  crime,  yet  have  the  same  seven 
planets;  and  argues  that  since  Jews  are  all  circumcised  on 


782    MAGIC  AND  EXPERIMENTAL  SCIENCE  chap,  xxxiv 

the  eighth  day,  they  should  all  have  the  same  horoscope. 
These  are  familiar  contentions,  at  least  as  old  as  Bardesanes. 
Marbod  declares  further  that  the  astrological  writer,  Firmi- 
cus,  employs  "infirm  arguments,"  and  that  his  own  horo- 
scope, taken  according  to  Firmicus'  methods  and  interpreted 
likewise,  turned  out  to  be  false,  "as  I  proved  when  once  I 
dabbled  in  that  art."  This  is  interesting  as  showing  that 
Gerard  of  York  ^  was  not  the  only  bishop  of  the  eleventh 
century  who  was  acquainted  with  the  work  of  Julius  Firmi- 
cus Maternus,  and  that  even  opponents  of  astrology  are  apt 
to  have  once  been  dabblers  in  it.  Marbod  concludes  his 
poem  with  this  neat  turn : 

"I  thought  I  ought  to  write  these  lines  briefly  against 
genethlialogy. 

Nevertheless,  that  I  may  not  seem  to  repel  fate  and  horo- 
scope utterly, 

I  assert  that  my  fate  is  the  Word  of  the  supreme  Father, 

By  Whom  should  all  things  be  ruled  and  all  men  confess ; 

And  I  say  that  the  computation  of  my  constellation  is 
innate  in  me 

And  the  liberty  by  which  I  can  tend  whither  I  will. 

Therefore,  if  my  will  shall  be  in  conjunction  with  reason 

In  the  sign  of  the  Balances  with  Christ  regarding  me, 

All  things  will  turn  out  prosperously  for  me  here  and 
everywhere : — 

This  is  the  favorable  horoscope  of  all  Christ's  followers." 

*See  above,  chapter  29,  page  689. 


GENERAL  INDEX 


Names  of  men  of  learning  will  be  found  for  the  most  part  in  the 
bibliographical  index. 


Aaron,  357,  379,  464,  507 

Abacus,  698,  704 

Abbreviation,  135,  500,  624 

Abdomen,  diseases  of,  577 

Abimelech,  399 

Abortion,  61,  94 

Abraham  the  patriarch,  astrology 
and  science  of  350,  353,  355,  411, 
703 ;  magic  use  of  name  of,  437, 
449,  726 

Abraxas,  371,  379 

Abrotonum,  an  herb,  495 

Abscess,  93 

Abstinence  from  animal  food,  295, 
308,  314 

Academy,  the,  268,  270,  602 

Accusation  of  magic  against,  Gal- 
en, 125,  165-7;  alchemists,  194; 
Apuleius,  222,  232-40;  ApoUoni- 
us  of  Tyana,  246;  the  emperor 
Julian,  318;  Jews,  337,  436-9; 
Christ  and  Christians,  337,  383, 
395-6,  415,  424,  433,  436-9,  463, 
465,  50s;  pagans,  415;  philoso- 
phers, 416;  heretics,  415,  424; 
Origen,  461 ;  Priscillian,  380-1, 
519-20;  Libanius,  538;  Bede, 
635 ;  Gerbert,  704-5 ;  Constan- 
tinus  Af  ricanus,  744,  755 ;  Dun- 
stan,  773 

Achilles,  ghost  of,  264;  master  of, 
597 

Aconite,   74,    171 

Acorn,  740 

Acoustics,  185 

Acron,  56 

Adalbert,  bishop  of   Bremen,  773 

Adam,  first  man,  68r 

Adamant,  81,  294,  636;  swords  of, 
253,  258 ;  breakable  by  goat's 
blood,  56,  85,  511,  588,  779;  by 
lead,  657 

Adder,  279,  721 

Adopai,  365,  367,  451,  583,  726 

Adrianaion,  434 

Adultery,  discovery  of,  364,  644       | 

783 


Advertising,  186 

Aeetes,  329 

Aegina,  86,  301 

Aelian,  a  consul,  262 

Aemilianus,  224 

Aeon,  363-4,  378,  383,  411 

Aerimancy  or  Aeromancy,  344,  629 

Aesculapius,  shrine  of,  283,  329, 
379;  and  see  other  index 

Aetites,  a  gem,  257,  329,  330,  581, 
777 

Affroselinum,  765 

Agate,  294,  721 

Agathodaemon,  173,  292,  379,  587, 
661 ;  and  see  other  index 

Aglaides,  431 

Aglaonice,    203 

Agnus  castus,  an  herb,  756 

Agnus  Dei,  72,7 

Agricultural  magic,  21,  70,  79-80, 
93-4,  216,  219,  294,  604-S,  626 

Ague,  536 

Air,  importance  of  pure,  142,  151 ; 
pressure  of,  188;  experiments 
with,  190-2;  and  continuity  of 
universe,  206 ;  star  in,  478 

Albicerius,  518 

Alchemy,  Egyptian,  12-3;  Greek, 
59.  131,  193-200,  320,  544-5,  764; 
Pliny,  81,  193  ;  Arabic  and  Latin, 
chap,  xxxiii,  368,  398,  649,  663-4, 
669-70,  697,  757,  772> 

Alcmaeon,    324 

Alcohol,  468,   765 

Alcoholism,  253 

Alexander  the  Great,  chap,  xxiv, 
186,  496,  602;  and  see  other  in- 
dex 

Alexander  of  Abonutichus,  277-8 

Alexander  V,  pope,   106 

Alexandria,  as  a  center  of  an- 
cient learning,  27,  39,  48,  105, 
109,  123,  145,  187,  224,  291,  318, 
348,  449,  541,  552,  763;  dissection 
at,  147;  measures  of,  144;  rela- 
tions   with    India,   245;    in    the 


784 


GENERAL  INDEX 


p  s  e  u d  o  -  Clementine  Homilies, 
404,  408 

Alexandrina,  golden,  739 

Alexandrinus  Olympius,  300 

Alive,  taken  from,  580,  591 ; 
burned,  see  Crab 

Allectory,  a  gem,  779 

Allegory  and  allegorical  interpre- 
tation, in  alchemy,  195-8;  of  the 
Bible,  350,  479,  484,  633;  in  zo- 
ology, 396,  500,  502 ;  miscellane- 
ous, 545,  626;  and  see  Symbol- 
ism 

Almanac,  318 

Almond,  78 

Aloaeus,  see  Eloeus 

Alphabet  in  magic  and  divination, 
197,  370.  380,  592,  664,  711;  and 
see  Vow^el 

Alphabetical  order,  166,  176,  606, 
610 

Alpheus,  river,  102 

Altar,  80,  239,  295,  378 

Alum,  765 

Amazons,  114,  564,  603 

Ambassador,  see  Embassy 

Amber,  49,  213 

American  Indians,  16-17 

Amiantus,  a  gem,  81,  213 

Ammon,  the  god,  546,  553,  561-2 

Ammon  (or,  Hammon),  King  of 
Egypt,  291 

Ammonia,  571 

Amnael,  an  angel,  195 

Amor  aquae,  764 

Amulet,  Egyptian,  10;  in  Pliny, 
70,  77,  81,  85,  87,  89,  92;  in  Ga- 
len, 166,  172-3,  176;  in  Plutarch, 
204,  294;  Gnostic,  380;  Aris- 
totle represented  as  an  adept  in, 
563 ;  post-classical  and  early 
medieval  medicine,  572,  580,  755  ; 
Arabic,  655-6;  and  see  Ligatures 
and  suspensions 

Amusements,  ancient,  137,  486 

Anaesthetics,   142,  626 

Anastasius,  Pope,  461 

Anatomy,  of  Galen,  145-51 ;  Em- 
pirics hostile  to,  157;  of  Rasis, 
668 

Andrew,   St.,  legend  of,  435 

Andronicus,  the  prefect,  542 

Anemone,  65 

Angel,  see  Spirit 

Angitia,    329 

Anglo-Saxon,  manuscripts,  chap, 
xxix,  597,  612-3;  medicine,  chap, 
xxxi 

Angobatae,  188 


Animal,  incapable  of  magic,  4;  in 
early  Greek  religion,  23 ;  habits, 
intelligence,  jealousy,  and  reme- 
dies employed  by,  26,  57,  73-5, 
217-8,  254,  chap,  xii,  460,  490, 
574,  626;  use  of  parts  of,  11,  20, 
67-70,  75-6,  87,  133,  167,  229,  587, 
606,  721,  740,  755,  766;  living  in 
fire,  240;  sacred,  311;  minute, 
27s;  in  art,  502;  breeding  and 
horoscopes  of,  516;  and  see 
Abstinence  from  animal  food, 
Gods,  Language,  Sculpture, 
Transformation,  and  the  names 
of  individual  animals 

Anise,  229 

Annacus,  king,  340 

Annunciation,  263 

Anonymity,  133,  728 

Ant,  71-2,  75,  81,  98,  329,  331 ;  In- 
dian, 636 

Anthemius  of  Tralles,  575 

Anthropology,  300 

Anthropos,  Gnostic,  380 

Antichrist,  417 

Antidote,    130,    154,   253,   441,   494 

Antimony,  735 

Antioch,  254,  296,  404,  421,  428, 
431,  472,  662,  747 

Antipathy,  84,  173,  213,  217,  219, 
239,  581,  605 

Antiphon,  an  interpreter  of  omens, 
562 

Antipodes,  219,  480-I 

Antiscia,  537 

Anubion,   420 

Ape,  148,  256;  and  see  Cynoceph- 
alus 

Apelles  the  painter,  55 

Apollo,  23,  93,  212,  253,  294,  317, 
326,  371,  429,  735 

Apollobeches,  58 

Apollonius  of  Tyana,  chap,  viii, 
165,  244,  288,  295,  390,  435,  465 

Apoplexy,  536 

Apothecary,  84,  129 

Apparatus,  magical,  28,  190;  and 
see  Magic,  materials 

Apparition,  66,  68,  204,  208,  215, 
437-8,  455,  496,  509-10,  779;  and 
see  Spirit 

Appion,  419-20;  and  see  Apion  in 
other  index 

Appius,  friend  of  Cicero,  270 

Applied  science,  ancient,  chap,  v, 
408;  early  medieval,  chap,  xxxiii 

Aquila,  disciple  of  Peter,  chap. 
xvii 

Aquileia,    124 


GENERAL  INDEX 


785 


Arab,  Arabia,  and  Arabic,  early 
poetry,  6 ;  drugs  and  spices 
from,  84,  129,  765;  Apollonius  of 
Tyana  in,  261,  295 ;  magic  of, 
280;  home  of  the  Magi,  476; 
learning,  2\,iZ9,  I74,  189,  578, 
chaps,  xxviii,  xxx,  xxxii ;  and 
see  Middle  Ages,  Translations 

Arcadia,  214,  249,  283 

Archiater,  125,  161,  536 

Architecture,  122,  chap,  v 

Archon,  see  Spirit 

Arcturus,  331,  636 

Arena,  133,  147;  and  see  Gladiator 

Areobindus,  a  consul,  607 

Arethusa,    102 

Argemon,  an  herb,  79 

Ariolus,  629 

Aristochia,  an  herb,  615 

Arithmetic,  126,  319,  619,  628, 
704 

Armenian,  351,   374,  497,  554 

Arms  and  armor,  344 

Aromatics,  311 ;  and  see  Spice,  Un- 
guent 

Arrow,  extracted,  756;  poisoned, 
767 

Art  and  the  Arts,  magic  and,  6, 
28;  standards  of,  187,  407;  early 
medieval,  chap,  xxxiii ;  and  see 
Artisan  and  the  names  of  vari- 
ous arts 

Artemis  Tauropolos,  429 

Artemisia,  89 

Artery,    147 

Artisan,   482,    486 

Aruspex,  see  Haruspex 

Asbestos,    213-4,    434 

Ascension,  of  Romulus,  274;  of 
Simon  Magus,  422 

Ascetic,    see    Monasticism 

Asclepius,  a  god,_253,  277,  546,  735; 
and  see  other  index 

Ash,  tree,  86 

Ashes,  reduced  to,  68,  80,  91,  170, 
57 1 -4,  581,  586-8,   590,  721 

Ashthroat,  an  herb,  722 

Asp,  57,  85,  324,  494,  571,  580,  587, 
626 

Asparagus,    599 

Asphalt,    132,  574 

Asphodel,  88 

Ass,  76,  88,  230,  275,  326,  367,  734, 
740 

Assurbanipal,  15,  27 

Assyria,  magic  of,  11,  15-20,  58, 
295,  629;  bibliography,  33-5 

Astanphaeus,  365,  367 

Asthma,  76 


Astral  theology,  15,  17,  360-1 ;  and 
see  Astrology,   Star 

Astrolabe,  115,  501,  542,  559,  chap, 
xxx,  728 

Astrological  medicine,  179,  575, 
633,  738 

Astrology,  chaps,  iii,  ix,  xi,  xv, 
xxix,  xxx;  also,  Egyptian,  13-4; 
Sumerian  or  Chaldean,  15-7,  and 
see  Chaldean;  Greek,  22,  25-6; 
Pliny,  91,  94-7;  popular  Roman, 
127,  285;  Galen,  127,  166,  178; 
Greek  philosophy  and,  180-1 ; 
Vitruvius,  184-5,  187;  Hero,  193; 
alchemy  and,  197;  Plutarch,  207, 
209;  Apuleius,  231,  239-40; 
Brahmans,  253 ;  Lucian,  282-3 ; 
Nechepso,  Petosiris,  and  Mane- 
tho,  292-3;  Solinus,  330;  Hora- 
pollo,  333;  Hermes,  290-2; 
Enoch,  340-1 ;  Philo  Judaeus  and 
Jevk'ish,  353-6;  Pseudo-Clement, 
410-3 ;  church  fathers,  444,  455- 
8,  464,  466,  471-5,  492;  Augus- 
tine, 513-21;  Firmicus,  529-38; 
Pseudo-Quintilian,  540;  Syne- 
sius,  543;  Nectanebus,  560-3; 
Alexander  of  Tralles,  583 ;  Her- 
barium of  Apuleius,  598;  Geo- 
ponica,  604-5;  Boethius,  621-2; 
Isidore,  632-3 ;  Arabic,  644-52, 
661-6,  670;  Salernitan,  738;  Con- 
stantinus  Africanus,  756;  Mar- 
bod,  781-2;  alchemy  and,  76^', 
magic  and,  300,  432,  464,  538, 
540;  and  see  Christ,  birth  of; 
Image;  Magi;  Planet;  Star 

Astronomy,  of  Egypt,  13,  542,  545, 
559;  Tigris-Euphrates,  15-6,  34; 
India,  31;  Greek,  31-2;  benefits 
of,  47,  96 ;  of  Ptolemy,  105,  107 ; 
and  architecture,  122,  185 ;  his- 
tory of,  366,  707 ;  miscellaneous, 
219,  395,  520,  536,  663,  704 

Atavism,  141 

Atheism,   234 

Athens,  28,  95,  142,  217,  230,  249, 
429;  as  center  of  learning,  135, 
200,  222,  242,  269,  277,  538,  541, 
602 

Athlete,    186,    248,   486 

Atlas,   Mt.,   54 

Atom,  Atomic  theory,  Atomism, 
140,    169,    178.    205,    408 

Attalus,  king  of  Pergamum,  135, 
171 

Attalus  III,  236 

Augury,  in  Assyria,  17;  Rome,  95; 
Seneca,  103;  Galen,  171;  denied 


786 


GENERAL  INDEX 


by  Atomists,  178;  accepted  by 
Stoics,  180;  Neo-PIatonists,  315; 
Jews  and  early  Christians  on, 
352,  458-9,  466,  511,  513,  534,  630; 
miscellaneous,  560,  629,  673,  705 

Auspices,  430,  629 

Authority  and  Authorities,  attitude 
to,  citation  by,  Pliny,  46,  49,  75 ; 
Ptolemy,  107;  Galen,  118,  152- 
8,  167;  Vitruvius,  186-7;  Zosi- 
mus,  198;  bogus,  215;  Cicero, 
270;  Solinus,  327-8;  Hippoly- 
tus,  469;  Firmicus,  537;  Aeti- 
us,  570;  Marcellus,  585-6;  me- 
dieval freedom  with,  611;  Ma- 
cer,  614;  Isidore,  624-5;  Petro- 
cellus,  734;  miscellaneous,  32, 
215,  778 

Automaton,  188,  192,  230,  440 

Axle-grease,  92 

Baal,  priest  of,  386 

Babel,  453 

Babylon  and  Babylonia,  11,  14-21, 
23-4,  31,  33-5,  95,  97,  227,  239, 
247-8,  266,  283,  360-1,  376,  383-4, 
414,  527,  537,  652,  661,  744 

Bagdad,  661-2,  667,  744,  762 

Balaam,  prophet  or  magician  ?  267, 
352-3,  385,  445-8,  459;  and  the 
Magi,  385,  444,  474,  479,  519 

Balach  or  Balak,  447 

Baldness,   536 

Balis,  an  herb,  75 

Balsam,  392,  738 

Baptism,  368,  373,  405,  408,  432 

Barbarians,  148,  376,  445,  449,  619, 
638 

Barbarossa,  see  Frederick  I 

Barber,  229 

Barcelona,  699 

Barefoot,  599 

Barley,  88;   water,   143 

Baroptenus,  a  gem,  81 

Barrocus,  an  herb,  615 

Basilica  at   Fano,    187 

Basilides,  the  heretic,  372 

Basilisk,  67,  70,  75,  169,  494,  573, 
603,  626,  636 ;  and  cock,  324,  771 

Basilius  the  magician,  639 

Basin,  560 

Bat,  68-9,  159,  331,  587 

Bath,  142-3,  281,  587,  676,  729; 
public,  140,  295,  434-5 ;  sea,  231- 
2,  405 

Battle  predicted,  275 

Bayeux   Tapestry,   502,   675 

Bean,   591 

Bear,  75,  92,  219,  367,  490;   licks 


cubs  into  shape,   168,   177,  331; 

constellation  of  the,  179 
Beard,  416 

Beast,  name  of  the,  582 
Beasts,    wild,   216,  229,   564,  669; 

dealers  in,  133 
Beauty,  300,  4^ 
Beaver,    502,    636;    castration    of, 

^d,-^,  332, 574 

Bed-bug,  68,  85,  89,  175 

Bee,  76,  85,  219,  615,  636,  721 ;  and 
see  Honey 

Beech   tree,  213 

Beetle,  81,  219,  581 

Behbit  el-Hagar,   559 

Behemoth,  346-7,  367 

Bektanis,  559 

Bell,  church,  722 

Bellerophon,  282 

Bell's   palsy,    738 

Belt,  see  Girdle 

Bemarchius,  rival  of  Libanius,  538 

Berenice,  463,  558 

Beryl,   780 

Bethlehem,  star  of,  see  Christ, 
birth  of;  Magi,  who  came  to 
Christ  child 

Betony,    77,    86,    7Z7 

Bibliography,  of  Pliny,  46,  215; 
Isidore,  623;  Peter  the  Deacon, 
746 

Bile,    171,    177 

Bird,  73,  78,  80,  201,  218,  236,  325, 
460,  544 ;  rite  of  strangling,  301 ; 
mechanical,  192,  266;  and  see 
Augury  and  the  names  of  indi- 
vidual birds 

Birth-control,  94 

Birth-mark,  713 

Bishop,    542 

Bishopwort,  722 

Bitumen,    571,    574,   603 

Bituminous   trefoil,    175 

Black,  68,  175,  582,  591 

Bladder,  536,  599,  769 

Bleeding,  75,  125,  141-2,  162,  177, 
576,  676,  679,  681,  684-s,  688, 
724,  728,  735,  737-8 

Blind,  536,  590 

Blood,  miraculous,  231 ;  human, 
use  of,  61,  102,  175,  227,  581, 
603,  629,  721 ;  human,  and  the 
moon,  98,  146,  391 ;  circulation 
of,  409,  430 ;  of  various  animals 
used,  86-7,  89,  131,  159,  166,  17s, 

587,    590,    727,   729,   737,   7(^-7; 
and     see     Adamant,     Bleeding, 
Hemorrhage 
Blotch,  640 


GENERAL  INDEX 


787 


Boar,  69,  92,  580,  599 

Boethus,  134 

Boil.  88 

Bones,  stuck  in  throat,  71,  583 ; 
number  in  body,  2)7^ ;  prehis- 
toric, 407 ;  use  of,  573,  583.  656 

Book,  trade  in  Roman  empire,  134- 
5 ;  magic,  432,  435,  472,  505,  705 ; 
loss  of,  752 

Bordeaux,  568 

Borellus,  duke,  704 

Botany,  20,  65,  129,  343,  463;  and 
see  Herb 

Box,  229,  250 

Boy,  in  divination  and  magic,  81, 
239,  249,  416-9,  463;  and  peony, 

173 

Bracelet,  81,  89 

Brahmans,  248-54,  258,  266,  376, 
407,  410,  412,  450-1,  556,  564 

Brain,  center  of  nervous  system, 
145-6 ;  cavities  of,  659-60,  735 ; 
inflammation  of,  536;  of  various 
animals  used,  see  names  of  in- 
dividual animals 

Bread,  89,  424 ;  blessing  and  break- 
ing, 727 

Breastplate  of  high  priest,  495 

Breath  and  breathing,  134,  146, 
207,  658 

Brindisi,   764 

Britain  and  Briton,  59,  141,  206-7, 
376,   489 

Bronze,  764 

Buddha,  251 

Bugloss,  viper's,  an  herb,  722 

Buglossa,  an  herb,  615 

Bull,  79,  86,  168,  261,  367,  599,  765- 
6;  tamed  by  fig-tree,  77,  213,  2,Z^, 
626 

Bulrush,  92 

Buprestis,  77,  494 

Burial,  magic,  69-70,  80,  88,  662, 
666;   alive,  421 

Burned  to  death,  433,  571,  639 

Business,  97,  107,  128,  248,  (£6; 
early  Christian  attitude  to,  494 

Butter,   154,  721-2 

Byzantine,  189,  194-5,  Z^t,,  398,  482, 
555,  569,  607,  72,2,  745,  761-2 

Cabbage,  86,  175 
Cabbala,  7,  365 
Caesarea,  404-6 
Cairo,  8 
Calchas,  271 
Calculus,  536 

Calendar,  13-4,  327,  345,  676,  686, 
712 


Calf,  150,  571 

Caligula,  emperor,  193,  349 

Caliph,  607,  653,  670,  745 

Canwleon,  600;  and  see  Cha- 
meleon 

Camel,  396,  62,6 

Campus  Martius,  424-5 

Canal,  Isthmian,  262 

Candelabrum,  380 

Candle,  magic,  87,  380,  385,  469 

Candlestick,  seven-branched,  385, 
676 

Cannibal,  61-2,  573 

Canute,  king,  351 

Carolingian,  616,   635 

Carpenter,  393 

Carpesium,  a  drug,  132 

Carpocrates,  a  heretic,  371 

Cart  rut,  81,  88-91,  721 

Carthage,  222,  269,  553,  744 

Carton,  129 

Carystus,  213 

Cask,  767-8 

Caspian   Sea,  489 

Castoria,  739 

Cat,  68,  636 

Cataract,  in  eye,  175,  729 

Catarrh,  82,  88-9,  142,  176 

Caterpillar,  80 

Cathedral,  501-2,  761 

Catochites,  a  gem,  330 

Caul  of  an  ox,  469 

Cauldron,  468 

Cauterization,  536,  723 

Cecrops,  415 

Cedar,  20 

Celidonius,  see  Swallow-stone 

Celt  and  Celtic,  245,  567-8,  722, 
732 

Cemetery,  434 

Cenchrea,  136 

Centaur,  603 ;  and  see  Chiron  in 
other  index 

Centipede,  76,  494,  587 

Cerberus,  280 

Ceremonial,  Egypt,  10 ;  Assyria, 
18,  20;  Pliny,  64,  69,  71,  77-82, 
90;  Apuleius,  230,  235;  Orphic, 
295 ;  rite  of  strangling  birds, 
301 ;  Gnostic,  378 ;  Marcellus, 
590-2 ;  Arabic,  663 ;  medieval 
medicine,  726;  and  see  Herb, 
plucking  of ;  Spirit,  invocation 
of ;  etc. 

Chalcite,   132 

Chaldean  (mostly  mere  mentions 
of),  16-7,  98,  102,  185,  201,  230, 
239,  250,  253,  272-4,  279,  281,  287, 
316,  323,  353,  375-6,  380,  399,  430, 


788 


GENERAL  INDEX 


444,  456,  469,  476,  479,  519,  560, 
632,  703,  711,744 

Chalkydri,  347 

Cham,  see  Ham 

Chameleon,  62,  175,  581 

Chance,  experience,  36,  75,  156, 
172,  754;  and  fate,  210 

Chaplet,  295 

Characters,  magic  use  of,  229,  257, 
314,  317,  512,  579,  592-3,  604, 
630,  645,  654,  724-30 

Charicles,  232 

Chariot,   423 

Charlatan,  668-9;  and  see  Old- 
wives 

Charlemagne,  214,  556,  672,  764 

Charon,  277 

Chastisements,  204 

Chastity,  78,  81,  83,  204,  216,  295, 
308,  326,  564,  581,  588,  590,  599, 
799-80;  and  see  Virgin 

Cheese,   142,  325,  509 

Chelidonia  and  Chelidonius,  see 
Swallow-wort  and  Swallow- 
stone 

Chelonitis,  a  gem,  780 

Chemical  and  Chemistry,  132-40, 
467-9;  and  see  Alchemy 

Chick,  76,  754,  771 ;  Aristotle  on 
embryology  of,  30,  146 

Chickpea,  88 

Child-bearing  and  Child-birth,  y6, 
78,  84,  87,  92,  94,  102,  175,  177, 
216,  253,  260,  295,  325,  496,  581, 
68s,  713,  726,  738,  740;  forma- 
tion of  child  in  womb,  150,  545, 
557,  757;  child  born  after  eight 
months  dies,  181,  356,  757; 
monstrous  birth,  627 ;  and  see 
Abortion,  Birth-control 

Chimaera,  367 

China  and  Chinese,  6-7,  214;  and 
see  Seres 

Chiromancy,  386 

Chneph  or  Chnuphis,  379 

Chrism,  738 

Christ,  137-9,  243,  363,  379,  386, 
404-S,  422,  510,  527,  529,  620, 
674-5,  782 ;  accused  of  magic,  see 
Accusation ;  birth  of,  and  astrol- 
ogy, 386,  438,  457,  464,  471-9, 
703 ;  birth,  virgin,  460 ;  child, 
chap,  xvi,  390;  power  of  name 
of,  434,  452,  466,  638-9,  72s,  729- 
30 

Christian  and  Christianity,  Book 
II,  passim;  137,  139,  207,  275-6, 
285,  296,  298,  306,  312,  320,  327, 
554,   568,   584,  602,  chap,  xxvii, 


642,     715;     and     see     Religion, 

Theology 
Christmas,  678 
Chronology,    135,    209,    624,    711; 

and  see  Calendar 
Church  fathers,  Book  II,  passim; 

180,  225,  241,  302,  618 
Cicada,    169 
Cinaedia,  590 
Cinnabar,  626,  761,  764 
Cinnamon,  129-30,  256 
Circe,  21,  65,  324,  434,  509,  629 
Circle,  magic,  78,  86-7,  91,  197,  281, 

366,    599;     squaring    the,    706; 

Cardan's  concentric,  769 
Circumcision,  449,  475,  781 
Circus,  295,  486 
City,    fortune    of,    predicted,    273, 

283 ;  ancient,  489,  504 ;  ideal,  349- 

50,  460 
Civilization,  magic  and  origin  of, 

5-6;  Pliny  as  source  for  history 

of,  43 
Clairvoyance,  647 ;  and  see  Divina- 
tion,  natural 
Clarus,  224 
Classical   heritage,    555,   618,   636; 

and  see  Middle  Ages 
Classics,  superstition  in,  21-4 
Claudia,    55 
Clay,   animals,   393,   769;   and  see 

Pottery 
Climate,    184 
Cloak,  virtue  of,  397,  435 
Clock,  see  Time 
Clothing,  virtue  in,   136,  295,  382, 

chap,  xvi,  407,  441,  534,  598,  666 ; 

and   see   names   of   various   ar- 
ticles of 
Clyster,  142 
Cock,  168,  175,  320,  324-5,  766,  771, 

779 ;  cock-crow,  280,  405 
Cog-wheel,  192 
Cold,  quality,  140,  161,  219;  drink, 

141 ;   disease,   589 
Colic,  87,  169,  579,  582,  590 
Cologne,  three  kings  of,  446,  477 
Colonus,  638 
Colony,  Greek,  318 
Color,  discussed,  140,  486;  chang- 
ing, 216;  in  magic,  90,  367,  369, 

590,  721  ;  and  see  the  names  of 

individual  colors 
Combustible        compounds,        see 

Candle 
Comedy,   Greek,  22-4 
Comet,  96,  115,  457,  543,  633,  635, 

(>73 
Commodus.  emperor,  125,  129 


GENERAL  INDEX 


789 


Compass,  points  of,  91,   114,  378, 

586,  591,  724 
Compotus  or  Computus,  536,  676- 

7,  728 
Compound,  magical  or  medicinal, 

ID,  83,  140,  152,  159-60,  172,  571, 

586-7,  722,  72A 
Conception,  562,  656,  724,  740 
Condrion,  an  herb,  74 
Confederate,  in  magic  fraud,  467 
Conjunction,  astrological,  104,  642, 

648-9 

Conjuration  of  an  herb,  583;  and 
see  Incantation,  Spirit,  invoca- 
tion of 

Consecration,  of  a  painted  grape, 
80;  of  gems,  295,  781;  and  see 
Holy 

Constantine  the  Great,  525fif. 

Constantine  Monomachos,  745 

Constantine  Porphyrygennetos, 
604 

Constantius,  emperor,  525ff. 

Constans,  emperor,  525ff. 

Constantinople,  472,  477,  494,  533, 
541 ;  and  see  Byzantine 

Constellation,  14,  114,  178,  304,  709 

Constipation,  779 

Consumption,  213,  2,7Z,  536,  588 

Cook,   148 

Copernican  theory,  32 

Copperas,  467 

Coptic,  361,  377 

Coral,  656 

Cordova,  704,  762 

Corinth,  123,  136,  230,  262,  280 

Corn  extracted,  71 

Corpse,  147,  229,  309,  629,  780;  and 
see  Necromancy,  Resurrection 

Cosmetics,  152,  668 

Cotton,  252 

Couch,  561 

Cough,  88,  176 

Counter-irritant,  723 

Cow,  77,  79,  81,  8s,  32s,  769 

Crab,  and  snake,  99;  river,  use  of 
eye  of,  68-9;  burned  alive,  80, 
178;  use  of  ash  of,  170,  572; 
stone  in  head  of,  72,7 

Crane,  sentinel,  217;  windpipe  of, 
used   in  magic,  278,  467 

Craw-fish,  217 

Creation,  16,  346,  408,  chap,  xxi, 
504-5,  627-8;  position  of  stars 
at,  711,  713 

Credulity  and  scepticism,  chap,  ix ; 
in  Pliny,  50-1,  61-4,  67,  70,  77, 
80-1,  88,  98;  Galen  and  the  Em- 
pirics, 157-8,  168-9,  175 ;  Seneca, 


102-3 ;     Plutarch,     204,     212-3 ; 

other   cases,   225,  244,  255,  388, 

440,  491-2,   539,  573-4,  626,  637, 

65s,  671,  780 
Crete,  129,  135,  249,  260 
Cricket,  67,  72>7 
Crime  and  criminal,  147,  167,  171, 

207,   225,   581 ;    and    see   Magic, 

evil  and  criminal;  Sin 
Critical    days,    158,    161,    164,    179- 

80,  356,  756 
Crocodile,  74,  166,  218,  238,  280 
Cropleek,  722 
Cross,  nail  from,  280;  in  sky,  475; 

sign  of,  432,  434,  466,  638-9,  722 
Crow,  207,  314,  324,  409,  636,  655 
Cruelty,  136,  225 
Crystal,  294,  767 
Cube,   184 
Cuckoo,  81 
Cummin  seed,  93 
Cuneiform,    15 
Cup,  Joseph's  divining,  386 
Cupping  glass,  192 
Curlew,  217 

Curse,  28,  93,  2>^,  434 
Cynics,  277 

Cynocephalia,  an  herb,  67 
Cynocephalus,  70,  333 
Cyprus,  magic  of,  59;  oil  of,  68; 

Galen's  visit  *o,  131-2 
Cyrene,  541 

Dacian,  597 

Daedalus,  283^ 

Daily  life,  magic  in,  9-10,  20;  ex- 
perience from,  54 

Danish,   612 

Dardanus,  a  magician,  58-9,  463, 
558 

Darius,  256,  260 

"Dark  Ages,"  618 

Date,  the  fruit,  20 

Date,  discussed  of,  Ptolemy,  105; 
Hero,  188;  Greek  alchemists, 
193-4 ;  works  of  Apuleius,  222- 
5 ;  Solinus,  326-7 ;  Horapollo, 
331;  Enoch  literature,  341-2; 
apocryphal  Gospels,  388-9 ; 
Pseudo  -  Clementines,  404-6; 
Physiologus,  497-9 ;  Augustine, 
504;  Mathesis  of  Firmicus,  526- 
7;  Synesius,  541;  Pseudo-Callis- 
thenes  and  Julius  Valerius,  552- 
5;  Aetius,  570;  Marcellus,  584-5; 
early  medieval  pseudo-literature, 
594-6 ;  Macer,  612-3 ;  Thebit, 
661 ;  introduction  of  Arabic  al- 
chemy,  77S ;   and  see   Calendar, 


790 


GENERAL  INDEX 


Chronology,  Compotus,  Crea- 
tion, Easter 

Day,  observance  of,  lucky  and  un- 
lucky, 14,  21,  106,  383,  513,  582, 
588,  590,  592,  661,  chap,  xxix, 
721,  725,  727,  754;  and  see  Crit- 
ical ;  Egyptian ;  Moon,  day  of ; 
Planetary  week 

Dead  Sea,  138 

Deaf,  536 

Decans,  178,  291,  315,  376,  453 

Deendor,  a  magician,  780 

Deer,  68,  70,  74,  84,  94,  207,  294, 
324,   586,  734 

Degree,  academic,  619;  medical, 
751-2 

Delirium,  536 

Delphic  oracle,  201,  266,  283,  326, 
538,  582 

Demeter,   429 

Demigod,  546 

Demiurge,   212,   383 

Demon,  see  Spirit 

Dentistry,  12;  and  see  Tooth 

Depilatories,  see  Hair 

Deroldus,  bishop,  yZ2> 

Desert,  herbs  in,  54 

Desiderius,    abbot,    747 

Design,  argument  from,  139,  148, 
408,  490 

Desire,  as  a  factor  in  magic,  644 

Deucalion,  341 

Devotio,  see  Curse 

Dew,  102 

Diacastoria,  739 

Diadochos,  a  gem,  780 

Diagram,  366-7,  674 

Dialectic,  420,  439,  536 

Diana,  130 

Dice,   136,  486 

Dick,  Mr.,  64 

Dictamnon,  see  Dittany 

Dictation,  ancient,  45,  134 

Dictionary,  599,  624 

Dictynna,   249 

Die,  582 ;  and  see  Dice 

Diet,  98,  137,  142,  159,  282,  414, 
429,  577,  587,  (>^^.  684,  735 

Digestion,  137,  205,  585 

Dinocrates,  186 

Diocletian,  emperor,  194 

Diomedes,  330 

Dionysius,  an  Egyptian,  440 

Dionysus,  the  god,  251,  546 

Dioptrics,  108 

Dipsas,  a  snake,  172,  284,  494 

Direction,  observance  of,  in  magic, 
90-1,  666;  and  see  Compass, 
Right.  Left 


Disease,  25,  98,  150,  208,  219,  310, 
430,  434,  536 ;  magic  transfer  of, 
19,  61,  71,  79,  213,  588-9;  and 
see  Spirit,  Woman,  and  the 
names  of  individual  diseases 

Dissection,  88,  134,  146-8,  164,  581, 
746 

Dittany,   218,  495 

Dives  and  Lazarus,  448 

Divinatio,  a  disease,  755 ;  and  see 
.150-1 

Divination,  chaps,  ix,  xxix,  86, 
127,  143,  165,  180,  253,  285,  533, 
539-40,  713;  varieties  listed, 
560 ;  in  China,  6-7 ;  Egypt,  13 ; 
Tigris-Euphrates,  17;  India, 
251;  relation  to  magic,  5,  14,  17, 
60,  226,  233,  295,  432,  512,  543, 
629;  by  divine  revelation,  205, 
249,  314,  364,  533,  and  see 
Prophecy;  by  demons,  442-3, 
510,  546;  natural,  103,  205,  239, 
305,  314,  318-9,  419,  518,  542-3; 
by  animals,  315,  325-6,  490,  and 
see  Augury ;  by  eating  parts  of 
animals,  70,  257,  314;  by  boys, 
249,  418-9,  463 ;  by  enthusiasm, 
180;  by  herbs,  66,  77,  614;  by 
drinking  or  inhaling,  313 ;  by 
Kalends,  677,  684;  by  lots,  num- 
bers, names,  112,  679,  682,  711, 
713,  and  see  Lot-casting;  by 
polished  surfaces,  774;  by 
sounds,  313,  430;  by  stones,  70; 
by  symbols,  166 ;  by  winds,  676, 
678;  and  see  Aerimancy,  Cup, 
Dream,  Geomancy,  Haruspex, 
Hydromancy,  Knot,  Liver, 
Moon,  Omen,  Pyromancy,  Sac- 
rifice, Sieve,  Selenomancy, 
Thunder 

Dog,  kennel,  69;  jealous,  75; 
puppyhood,  150;  omens  from, 
231 ;  prescience  of,  325;  as  sym- 
bol, 367;  demons  as,  435;  and 
mandragora,  607 ;  torn  to  pieces 
by,  277,  425,;  to  stop  bark  or 
attack  of,  77,  216,  249,  424,  605; 
disease  transferred  to,  88,  590-1 ; 
use  of  parts  of,  68,  70,  89,  90, 
159,  168-9,  573-4,  737,  755;  mad, 
and  bite  of,  68,  82,  86,  131,  169, 
178,  259,  263-4,  284,  2>72,  391, 
572,  656,  713,  754 

Dog-days,  572,  728,  756,  765 

Dogmatism,  154,  159,  735 

Dog-star,  66,  98,   178,  604 

Dolphin,   55,   218,   260 

Domitian,  emperor,  249-50,  259-65 


GENERAL  INDEX 


791 


Door,  used  in  magic,  71,  591 ;  af- 
fected by  magic,  226-7,  3i4>  449! 
trap,  469 

Dorians,  219 

Dositheus,  365,  417 

Dove,  142,  168,  324,  332,  636,  740 

Draconites,  a  gem,  75 

Dragon,  75,  231,  257,  326,  367,  392, 
429,  561,  603,  766;  use  of  parts 
of,  68,  70;  combat  with  ele- 
phant, 74,  257,  626;   flying,  347 

Dragontes,  an  herb,  614 

Drama,  and  magic,  22-3,  324;  li- 
turgical, 476-7 

Dream  and  divination  from,  in 
Egypt,  13-4;  in  cuneiform  texts, 
17 ;  Pliny,  56,  81 ;  Galen,  123, 
154.  156,  166,  170,  177-80;  Plu- 
tarch, 204,  205  ;  Apuleius,  231 ; 
Apollonius,  260 ;  Lucian,  283 ; 
Neo-Platonists,  314,  545 ;  Philo, 
354,  358;  Pilate's  wife,  395; 
Origen,  459;  Nectanebus,  560-2; 
Alkindi,  646;  miscellaneous,  197, 
329,  412,  434,  437,  459,  463,  487, 
509,  534,  627,  671,  680-1,  720, 
754,  763,  779 

"Dream-senders,"   368 

Dropsy,  69,  213,  536,  779 

Drugs,  55,  61,  84,  89,  128,  132,  370, 
467,   561,  668 

Druid,  46,  59,  67,  79,  640 

Drum,    204,   313 

Dualism,  361,  409 

Duck,  87-8 

Dung,  68,  69,  86,  166,  168,  588, 
656,  734,  740,  769 

Dye,  324,  467,  chap,  xxxiii 

Ea,  a  god,  i8 

Eagle,  87,  90,  176,  217,  257,  325-6, 
332,  441,  496,  574,  636 

Ear,  536 

Earache,   169,   579,  755 

Ear-wax,  721,  769 

Earth,  appeased,  conjured,  per- 
sonified, and  deified,  66,  79,  86, 
251,  295,  583,  598;  virtue  of,  81, 
88,  592,  and  see  Cart  rut,  Terra 
sigillata;  things  not  allowed  to 
touch  the  ground,  70,  79,  8r,  173, 
582,  588;  sphericity  of,  480; 
miscellaneous,  211,  373;  and  see 
Burial,  Land  and  Water,  Under- 
ground 

Earthquake,  97,  loi,  250,  254,  264, 
271,  430,  469,  562 

Earthworm,  68-9,  89,  176,  573-4, 
587,  720 


Easter,  521,  677;  mystery  of,  677 

Ebionites,  405 

Ebony,  560 

Echeneis,  212,  491,  626 

Eclipse,  96,  98,  203-4,  209,  262,  333, 
386,  564,  673 

Editions,  especially  early  printed, 
Pliny,  53;  Ptolemy,  106,  no; 
Galen,  1 19 ;  Solinus,  326 ;  Fir- 
micus,  525 ;  Pseudo-Callisthenes 
and  Julius  Valerius,  551-2;  Let- 
ter of  Alexander,  555;  post- 
classical  medicine,  566-7,  577; 
Herbarium  of  Apuleius,  597; 
Ethicus,  601;  Geoponica,  604; 
Dioscorides,  606-10;  Macer,  612; 
Isidore,  623 ;  Latin  translations 
from  Arabic,  642,  649ff.,  653, 
657,  665,  668,  716;  Regimen  Sa- 
lernitanum,  736 ;  Constantinus 
Af  ricanus,  chap,  xxxii ;  treatises 
on  arts,  760;  Marbod,  775, 
778 

Education,  as  experienced  or  dis- 
cussed by,  Galen,  118-28;  Vit- 
ruvius,  187;  Plutarch,  200-1; 
Apuleius,  222-4;  Lucian,  277; 
Christ  child,  394;  Cyprian,  429- 
31 ;  Firmicus,  525 ;  Synesius, 
540-1;  Bede,  634-5;  Rasis,  667; 
Gerbert,  704;  Constantinus,  744; 
Dunstan,  772',  Marbod,  775 

Eel,  491 

Egg,  shell,  54;  test  of  freshness, 
55;  made  by  hiss  of  snakes,  67; 
addled  by  certain  men,  83 ;  so- 
called,  of  alchemy,  198;  goose, 
277 ;  filled  with  dye,  467 ;  por- 
tents  from,  562,  772, ;   raw,  729 

Egypt,  7-14,  27-8,  30-1,  193-5,  198, 
206,  228-30,  239,  248,  250,  287, 
289,  300,  325,  331-4,  360,  376,  379, 
391,  414-6,  430,  437-8,  446,  450, 
452,  459,  503,  527,  537,  543,  558- 
60,  598,  744;  and  see  Plagues  of 

Egyptian  Days,  14,  chap,  xxix,  728 

Elchasaites,  373 

Elections,  astrological,  372-3,  386, 
517 

Electrum,  590 

Elements,  various  theories  of,  25, 

139,  157,  218,  254,  382,  408,  410, 
478,  485,  488,  528-9,  622,  645, 
720;  not  found  in  a  pure  state, 

140,  489 

Elephant,  intelligence  of,  73,  75, 
169,  218,  256,  636;  habits,  213, 
322,  324,  332,  460;  dissection  of, 
148;    compared    with    fly,    408; 


792 


GENERAL  INDEX 


white,  763 ;  and  see  Dragon  for 
combat  with 

Elephantiasis,  57,  170,  572 

Eleusinian  mysteries,  loi,  148 

Elijah,  386,  555 

Elixir,  670 

Eloeus,  365,  367 

Eloi,  583 

Elymas  the  sorcerer,  461 

Elysian  fields,  207 

Embalming,  magic  in,  8 

Embassy,  of  Philo,  349;  Synesius, 
541 ;  Leo,  557 

Embryology,  see  Chick,  Child- 
birth 

Emerald,  434,  656,  772 

Emperor,  Roman,  47,  50,  124,  129- 
30,  135,  176,  186,  194,  529;  and 
see  names  of  individual  empe- 
rors 

Empiric,     Empirica,     Empiricism, 

56-7,  155-7,  172,  735,  754 

Empousa,  310 

Empyrean,  see  Heaven 

Enceladus,  254 

Encyclopedia,  ancient,  43 ;  Arabic, 
663;  medieval,  52,  569 

Endor,  witch  of,  385,  448,  464, 
469-71,  506,  509-10,  629,  635 

Entrails,  see  Intestines,  Liver  div- 
ination 

Ephesus,  259-62 

Ephod,  448 

Epic,   16,   18 

Epicurean,   138,   150,  283,  408,  441 

Epidaurus,  329 

Epilepsy,  69,  87,  90,  173,  235,  238, 
536,  578-81,  614,  723,  726,  730, 
735-6,  754-6,  779 

Epitome,  495,  554-5,  568-9,  594, 
6o3ff.. 

Er,  vision  of,  212 

Erataoth,  a  spirit,  2^7 

Eretrians,  260 

Eridu,  15 

Erigeron,  an  herb,  89 

Erystion,  an  herb,  598 

Essenes,  405 

Ether,  254,  373;  and  see  Heaven 

Ethics,  602 

Ethiopia  and  Ethiopic,  141,  245, 
256,  283,  327,  341,  345,  398,  435, 
498,    554,    558-60,    654,    658,    744 

Etruscan,  467,  630 

Etymology,  625 

Eucharist,   369 

Eucrates,  280-1 

Eugenianus,  133 

Eugenics,  414 


Eumeces,  a  gem,  81 

Euphrates,  a  philosopher,  246,  253, 
263 ;  and  see  Tigris- 

Eustachian  tube,  576 

Evangelists,  four,  502,  674,  721 

Eve,  350,  511,  681 

Evil,  problem  of,  305,  309,  349; 
eye,  see  Fascination 

Evolution,  doctrine  of,  149,  493 

Ewe  hop  plant,  722 

Excommunication,  542 

Excrement,  human,  74,  143,  573 ; 
and  see  Dung 

Exercise,  physical,  587 

Exorcism,  18,  24,  280,  299,  368, 
386,  435,  533-4,  682,  722 

Experience,  Experiment,  Experi- 
mental method,  and  magic,  57, 
431-2,  447,  469,  540;  in  Pliny, 
53-7,  83,  88;  Ptolemy,  106-7; 
Galen,  118,  121,  144-63,  169,  173, 
175,  179;  Vitruvius,  187;  Hero, 
190;  Greek  alchemists,  198; 
Plutarch,  213;  Apuleius,  237; 
Simon  Magus,  420-2;  Firmicus, 
532 ;  post-classical  medicine, 
569,  573,  578-80,  583-7;  Diosco- 
rides,  606;  Macer,  615;  Arabic, 
644-6,  657,  669;  early  medieval 
medicine,  734-5,  738,  753-4;  arts 
and  alchemy,  762,  765-70;  and 
see  Empiric,  Observation 

Eye  complaints  and  cures,  56,  82, 
87,  98,  166,  175,  289,  325,  490, 
496,  536,  586,  589-90,  640,  670, 
720,  755,  779;  evil,  see  Fascina- 
tion 

Eyebrow,  151,   159,   175 

Eyelash,  92,  151 

Fades,  astrological,  710,  716 

Faith,  requisite  in  magic,  644 

Falernian  wine,  132,  586 

Familiar  spirit,  see  Spirit 

Family,  300 

Famine,  603 

Fascination,     71,     83,     217,     294, 

324 
Fastmg,  78,  82,  93,  174,  593,  705 
Fat,  67,  91,  130,  168,  755 
Fate,    181,    240,    306,    310,    315-6, 

353,  375,  620 
Fates,  three,  210,  565 
Faust,    Faustus,    or    Faustinianus, 

404,  406,  413,  417 
Feather,  70,  236 

Fee,  physician's,  670,  684,  688,  740 
Fennel,  722;   tasted  by  snake,  74 

490,  626 


GENERAL  INDEX 


793 


Fern,  80,  769 

Festival,  22,  107 

Fever,  18,  49,  65-6,  71,  89,  91,  141, 

536,  569,  575,  668,  720,_  727,  759 ; 

and  see  Quartan,  Tertian 
Fibula,  301 
Fifty,  356,  383 
Fig-tree,  see  Bull,  tamed  by 
Figure,  709.^10;   human,   723;   and 

see  Image,  Mannikin,  Statue 
Fill,  Irish,  640 
Finger,   middle,   589,   592;   use  of 

two,  583 
Fire,    the    element,    88,    229,    310, 

417;    marvelous,   252,   256,   368; 

at  Rome  in  192  A.  D.,  125,  134; 

universal,    104;    not   burned  by, 

416 
Fire  engine,  192 
Firmament,   see   Heaven;   Waters 

above  the 
First-born,  581 
Fish,  30,  49,  74,  yy,  218,  236-7,  260, 

325-6,  469,  589,  636,  657,  756 
Five,  92,  169,  357,  383,  590 
Flea,  60s 
Float,  192 

Flood,   16,   340,  475,  493 
Florilegij,,  618 
Fluxion,  583 
Fly,  insect,  76,  175,  408 
Flying,    397;    of    Simon    Magus, 

416-7,  422-7 
Foam,  of  snake,  67;  horse,  70,  86, 

589 
Folk-lore,    300,    567,    587,    722-3, 

72,2 
Foot,  580;  and  see  Barefoot 
Form,  487,  542 
Fossil  shells,  493 
Fotis,  229 
Fountain,  marvelous,  102,  318,  347, 

546,  769 
Four,  91,  356,  674-5,  728,  767 
Fox,  80,  89,  90,  168,  490 
Franklin,  Benjamin,  414 
Frederick  I,  Barbarossa,  emperor, 

477 
Free-Masonry,  183 
Free  will,  see  Will 
Frenzy,  755 
Frog,  68,  80,  90,  92,  159,  168,  231, 

491,  508,  588,  591,  656 
Fruit,  8s,   142,  599,  724 
Fumigation,  69,  282,  si 2,  740,  779 
Funeral,  214 

Furnace,  81,  393,  434,  657,  764 
Future    life,    8,    25,    47;    and    see 

Soul,  immortality  of 


Gabriel,  angel,  343,  367,  447,  452, 

454 

Gagates,^  a  gem,  154,  495,  724,  779 

Gaia  Seta,  599 

GalacJis,  294 

Galactites,  329 

Gall,  68,  71,  587,  726,  764-6 

Gall  nut,  467 

Games,  Greek  national,  186,  201 

Ganges,  2s8 

Garamantica,  a  gem,  97 

Garlic,  213,  722 

Gas,  55,   142 

Gate,  city,  591,  600 

Gaudentius,  404 

Gaul,  46,  76,  92,  568,  597,  672,  yy6 ; 
and  see  Druid 

Gazelle,  68,  70,  87 

Gehenna,    367 

Gem,  Assyrian,  20;  Pliny,  68,  70-1, 
80-1;  Apollonius,  254-8;  Orphic, 
293-6;  Gnostic,  27,  378-80; 
Pseudo-Plutarch,  216;  Solinus, 
328-9;  St.  John  and,  398;  Ori- 
gen,  460;  Epiphanius,  495-6; 
Augustine,  511;  in  medicine, 
590;  Pseudo-Dioscorides,  611, 
654;  Geoponica,  605;  Isidore, 
626-7 ;  found  in  animals,  75, 
294,  603,  72,7,  740,  755,  772,  779; 
Marbod,  chap,  xxxiv ;  and  see 
Consecration ;  Image,  engraved 
on ;  and  names  of  individual 
gems 

Genealogical  table,  624 

Generation,  spontaneous,  86,  219, 
238,  324,  509,  511;  of  various 
animals,  408-9,  460;  in  fire,  102, 
324;  human,  211;  and  corrup- 
tion, 210;  ruled  by  stars,  97; 
organs  of,  used  in  magic,  11, 
68-9,  356;  and  see  Child-birth, 
Conception,  Eugenics,  Private 
parts 

Genethlialogy,  115,  273,  353,  412, 
456,  513,  517,  560,  622,  629,  703, 
708,  781 

Genius,  see  Spirit,  orders  of 

Gentiles,  479,  674,  771 

Geocentric  theory,  32,  105,  488 

Geography,  discussed  by  Pliny, 
43-4;  Ptolemy,  105-7;  Philos- 
tratus,  244;  Solinus,  327;  other 
anc'ent,  488;  Ethicus,  600-4; 
other  medieval,  707 

Geology,  493 

Geomancy,  314,  343,  629,  648,  685 

Geometry,  122-3,  126,  185,  318, 
536,  542,  619,  663,  704 


794 


GENERAL  INDEX 


Gerard,  archbishop  of  York,  689, 
782 

Germ  of  disease,  219 

German,  invaders,  148,  351 ;  lan- 
guage, 498,  728;  scholarship, 
15-6,  30-1,  350,  684 

Germany,  45,  557 

Ghost,  233,  263,  280,  455,  540,  705 ; 
and  see  Necromancy ;  Endor, 
witch  of 

Giant,  254,  407,  430 

Girdle  or  ungirded,  69,  87,  284, 
512,  599 

Girl,  magic  power  of,  216 ;  and  see 
Virgin 

Githrife,  an  herb,  722 

Gladiator,  124,  149,  581,  673 

Glass,  Egyptian,  12;  Roman,  590, 
762 ;  medieval,  729,  764-7 ;  gems 
of,  781 ;  and  see  Stained 

Glaucon,  143,  161 

Glossopetra,  a  gem,  98 

Glue,  765 

Gnostic  and  Gnosticism,  chap,  xv, 
197,  211,  290,  298,  305,  360,  397, 
405,  411,  472,  547,  584,  661, 
720 

Goat,  69,  87,  130,  168,  213,  218, 
256,  325,  367,  467,  490,  581-2, 
729,  755.  759,  765-9;  and  see 
Adamant  and  blood  of 

Goblet,  258 

God  and  gods,  antiquity  of  belief 
in,  5-6,  203 ;  animal,  14,  283,  503 ; 
celestial,  14,  17,  25-6,  289,  309, 
530;  and  nature,  409;  and  man, 
206,  208,  254,  274,  416;  and  Ro- 
man emperors,  130,  529;  and 
art,  486;  and  magic,  8,  230, 
235-6,  249,  312,  320,  543;  Pliny 
concerning,  47,  97 ;  Seneca,  103 ; 
Galen,  139,  151,  167,  180;  Plu- 
tarch, 210;  Gnostic,  362,  375; 
Christian  attitude  to  pagan,  317; 
Firmicus,  527-30;  Boethius,  621; 
name  of,  599;  winged,  301;  and 
see  Apollo  and  other  individual 
names  of  gods,  Christ,  First 
cause.  Trinity,  etc. 

Goetia,  22,  247,  250,  505 

Gold,  69,  78-81,  215,  257,  301,  325, 
386,  590,  599,  739,  755;  chap, 
xxxiii ;  and  see  Alchemy 

Gonorrhoea,   536 

Goose,    168,   301 

Gorgon,  301 

Gothic  art,  501-2,  761 

Gout,  81,  142,  277,  284,  571,  575. 
579-81,  755 


Grafting,  55 

Grain,  325 

Grammar,  535,  596,  612,  625 

Grasshopper,  491 

Gravitation,   481 

Greece  and  Greek,  magic,  20-8,  58; 
science,  28-32,  46-7,  51,  62,  64; 
culture,  274,  283 ;  animals,  7Z  \ 
language,  ancient,  154,  186,  222- 
3,  2)77,  420;  language,  medieval, 
331-2,  625 

Greek  church,  397,  735 

Greek   fire,   256-7 

Griffin,  257,  325 

Grimoald,  abbot,  613 

Groin,  71,  590 

Ground,   see  Earth,  Underground 

Gruel,  142 

Guadalquivir,  254 

Gull,  159 

Gum,  468 

Gyges,  257  _ 

Gymnosophists,  247,  251,  260,  564 

Gynecology,  see  Women,  diseases 
of 

Hades,  see  Underworld 
Hadrian,   emperor,    136,   200,   244, 

318 
Hail,  see  Weather 
Hair,  69-70,  81,  151,  159,  176,  581 ; 

net,  175,  213;  tonic,  738 
Halc3ron  days,  255,  491 
Halicacabum,  TJ 
Hallucination,  509 
Ham,  son  of  Noah,  first  magician, 

414 
Hand,  laying  on  of,  386;  and  see 

Left,  Right 
Handkerchief,  213,  386 
Hangman's  noose,  71 
Hare,  159,  169,  253,  580 
Harewort,  722 
Harp,  magic,  773 
Harran,  661-2 
Haruspex,  95,    104,  SI  I,  513,   534, 

629 
Hathor  goddesses,  14 
Hatto,  bishop  of  Vich,  704 
Hawk,  74,  314,  332,  561 
Hawkweed,  74,  332 
Hazel  rod,  725-6,  730 
Head,     habit     of     inclining,    659; 

magical  speaking,  662,  705 
Headache,  18,  71,  92,  175,  591 
Hearsay,  585 
Heart,    physiology    of,    30,    146-9, 

153,  727  \  used  in  medicine  and 

magic,  70,  89,  y2y 


GENERAL  INDEX 


795 


Heat  and  Hot,  140,  142,  161,  175- 
6,  191 ;  and  see  Qualities 

Heathen,  see  Pagan 

Heatherberry,  722 

Heaven  and  Heavens,  one  or 
many?  16,  345,  363,  365,  372, 
382,  459,  487-8,  709;  empyrean, 
484;  and  see  Music  of  spheres. 
Star,  Universe,  Waters  above 
the  firmament 

Hebdomad,  sacred,  16,  365,  380 

Hebrew,  554,  577-8,  709,  711,  749; 
and  see  Jew 

Hecate,  215,  280 

Hedge,  91 

Hedge-hog,    325,    S02,   734 

Hedgerife,  722 

Helen,  Simon's,  363-5 

Helena,  empress,  477 

Helenus,  seer,  294 

Heliocentric  theory,  32,  97 

Heliotrope,  an  herb,  65,  87,  636 

Hell,  see  Underworld 

Hellebore,  74,  490,  636 

Hellene  and  Hellenism,  20-1,  245, 

541 

Hellenistic,  16,  22,  30-2,  39,  51, 
183,   189,  288,  294 

Hemlock,  the  poison,  490 

Hemorrhage,   536,  576 

Hen,  omen  from,  231 

Henbane,  722 

Hera,  goddess,  429 

Heracles,  251,  546,  582 

Heracleidae,  541 

Herb,  Egyptian,  10;  Assyrian,  19- 
20 ;  Greek,  23 ;  Cretan,  129 ; 
sacred,  76,  178;  Anglo-Saxon, 
722;  Pliny,  54-7,  65-7,  76-9; 
Galen,  154,  167;  Plutarch,  215-6; 
Apuleius,  229 ;  Orphic,  295-6, 
429-30;  Gnostic,  371;  Nectane- 
bus,  561,  post-classical  medicine, 
583.  591 ;  Herbarium  of 
Apuleius,  597-9 ;  Pseudo-Dios- 
corides,  606;  Macer,  614-5; 
used  by  animals,  324-5,  and  see 
Animals,  remedies  employed  by; 
conjuration  of,  583 ;  plucking 
of,  57,  65,  93,  160,  173,  252,  291, 
583,  614,  626,  721,  724,  727,  729 

Herbal,  596-9 

Herbalist,  79,   128 

Hercules,  see  Heracles 

Heredity,  75,  253 ;  and  see  Atavism 

Herefridus,    635 

Heresy,  chap,  xv,  488,  494,  507-8 

Hermesias,  a  compound,  84 

Hermogenes  the  magician,  435 


Hero,  a  kind  of  spirit,  180-1,  309- 
10,  469,  546 

Herod  the  king,  473,  479 

Heron,    218,    324 

Hind,   279,   721 

Hippomanes,  324 

Hippopotamus,  75,    169 

History  and  Historians,  relation 
to  this  investigation,  201 ;  Ro- 
man, 14,  94,  96,  201,  602;  omens 
and  portents  in,  14,  675 ;  atti- 
tude to,  of  Empirics,  156;  Vi- 
truvius,  185;  Lucian,  285-6; 
Cicero,  274;  Horapollo,  333-4; 
of  medicine,  153,  156,  735;  of 
philosophy,  180;  of  astronomy, 
537,  707;  of  alchemy,  195;  ages 
of,  383,  648,  675,  709;  astrologi- 
cal interpretation  of,  see  Con- 
junctions, Planets,  Magnus  An- 
nus; quantitative  method  and 
source-analysis  in,  533ff. ;  medi- 
eval attitude  to,  617;  harlequins 
of,  359 

Holy  Ghost  or  Spirit,  363-4,  372, 
397,  447 

Holy  salt,  722,  727 

Holy  wafer,  729 

Holy  water,  434,  721,  724,  727,  735 

Honey,  66,  68,  70,  76,  129,  142, 
229,  295,  599;  Attic  and  Hymet- 
tus,  132 

Honoratus,  638 

Hoopoe,  324 

Horaeus,  367 

Horn,  4,96,  586,  599,  722;  magic 
drinking,   191,  255 

Horoscope,  14,  115,  209,  315,  516, 
532,   560,  630 

Horse,  55,  70,  86,  168,  589,  722, 
730,  767;  and  see  Mare 

Horus,   19s 

Hour,  observance  of,  712,  714,  726 

House,  astrological,  114,  397 

Household  magic,  9,  69 ;  and  see 
Door,  Threshold,  Wall,  etc. 

Human  body,  symmetry  of,  184, 
519;  eight  parts  of,  452,  720; 
use  of  parts  of,  61,  81,  167,  229, 
573;  and  see  Blood;  Sacrifice, 
human;   Saliva,   Sweat,  etc. 

Humanism,  20,  338 

Humors,  536,  738 

Hyacinth,  a  gem,  496,  656 

Hydromancy,  233,  505,  629,  77^8o 

Hydromel,  79 

Hydrophobia,  56,  169,  171,  496, 
574;  and  see  Dog,  mad 

Hydroscope,  542 


796 


GENERAL  INDEX 


Hydrostatic  balance,  761 

Hyena,  67,  69-70,  332,  396,  587,  605, 

728 
Hymn,  18,  23,  317-8,  374,  433,  441, 

640 
Hypatia,  541 
Hyperborean,  280,  413 
Hyphasis,  river,  256 
Hyrcanian  Sea,  488 


laldabaoth,  367,  383 

lao,  laoth,  etc.,  367,  379-80,  583 

larchas  the  Brahman,  251  ff. 

Ichneumon,  74,  218,  575 

Idolatry,  421,  433,  452,  475,  603; 
and  see  Image 

Ikhnaton,  9 

Illuminated  manuscripts,  498,  502, 
547,  597,  676,  746 

Image,  engraved  and  astrological, 
173,  267,  292,  316,  443,  579,  582, 
645-6,  664-6 ;  Apuleius'  wooden, 
233 ;  Egyptian  mannikins,  8 ; 
sacrificial,  261 ;  mystic  seal,  367, 
378,  382;  of  wax,  10,  19,  25, 
560-3 ;  other  magic,  10,  19,  236, 
280,  314,  344,  441,  769 

Imagination,  pov\?er  of,  644,  660 

Iman,  doctrine  of  the  hidden,  356 

Immortality,  see  Soul 

Impotence,  391 

Incantation,  antiquity  of,  6 ;  Egyp- 
tian, 8,  12-4;  Assyrian,  17-9;  in 
Pliny,  69-72,  79,  88,  92-4;  Galen, 
166,  173-4;  Apuleius,  230,  233, 
239;  other  classical  authors,  25, 
253,  257,  279-81,  314;  Gnostic, 
299,  chap.  XV ;  Jewish  and  early 
Christian,  352,  398,  418-9,  437, 
442-3,  449-50.  463,  492,  510,  512; 
pseudo-literature  and  post-clas- 
sical medicine,  537,  560-1,  568, 
573,  579-83,  588-93,  598-9,  605; 
Arabic,  654-5 !  early  medieval, 
596,  626-9,  675,  696;  in  medicine, 
chap,  xxxi,  754,  759;  alchemy, 
769-70;  old  Irish,  640;  and  see 
Words,  power  of 

Incense,  722 

Incest,  475,   754 

Incubus,  574 

India,  chap,  viii ;  science  of,  31 ; 
drugs  from,  84,  132;  home  of 
Magi,  476-7 ;  marvels  of,  325-6, 
496,  564,  756;  occult  science  of, 
652-6,  710,  763;  miscellaneous, 
503,  744 

Indigestion,  779 


Industry,  and  magic,  12,  chap, 
xxxiii 

Infant,  exposure  of,  147;  ail- 
ments, 69,  169,  615 

Ink,  invisible,  467 

Innocent  III,  pope,  759 

Insanity,  216,  536,  585,  755,  779; 
and  see  Frenzy,  Lunacy,  etc. 

Insomnia,  90 

Instruments,  scientific,  107,  751 ; 
and  see  Musical 

Intent,  as  a  factor  in  magic,  644-6 

Interrogations,   astrological,  713-4 

Intestines,  87-8,   175,  409,  414,  592 

Inventions,  44,  149,  187-9,  426,  604 

Invisible,  to  become,  71,  251,  416, 
562,  638,  640;  writing,  265 

Invocation,  see  Necromancy  and 
Spirit 

Iris,  132 

Iron,  magic  use  of,  66,  69-71,  81, 
89,  213,  765,  769;  taboo  of,  78, 
81,  92,  614;  oxide  of,  130; 
quenching  hot,  713,  756 

Isaac  the  patriarch,  437 

Ishmaelite,  711 

Isis,  goddess,  195,  223,  280,  300, 
546,  559 

Island,  floating,   102 

Ismuc,  183 

Israel,  twelve  tribes  of,  495 

Istria,  601-2 

Itacius,  bishop,  381 

Italian  Renaissance,  see  Renais- 
sance 

Italians  and  Italy,  184,  557 

lunx,  265-7 

Ivory,  301,  599 

Ivy,  767-8 


Jacob  the  patriarch,  354,  358,  444; 
and  Esau,  369,  479,  514 

Jambres,  Jamnes,  or  Jannes,  the 
magician,  59,  431,  461 

James,  brother  of  Jesus,  392,  401, 
403,  405 

James  the  Great,  St.,  434-6 

Jannes  the  magician,  see  Jambres 

Jared,  and  magic,  415 

Jasper,  294,  572 

Jaundice,  49,  217,  536 

Jealousy,  see  Animal,  and  Pro- 
fessions, learned 

Jeremiah,   legend   of,   399 

Jerusalem,  393,  399,  415,  423,  477 

Jesus,  see  Christ 

Jew  and  Jewish,  219,  434,  436,  465, 
474-5,    583,   746,    762,   773,    781; 


GENERAL  INDEX 


797 


magic,   59,  437-9,  449;   religion, 

137;  tradition,  473 
Jewelry,  301 ;  and  see  Gem 
John  the  Baptist,  364,  727 
John,  duke  of  Campania,  557 
Jonathan,  471 
Joseph  the  patriarch,  his  coat  of 

many  colors,  352,  358;  divining 

cup,   386;    dream,   354,   358,   385 
Joseph,  father  of  Jesus,  393 
Joseph,  mentioned  by  Epiphanius, 

434 
Judea,  see  Palestine 
Judas  Iscariot,  391 
Juggler,  230,  312-3,  352,  437 
Juliana  Anicia,  606 
Juno,  goddess,  546 
Jupiter,  planet,  97,  184 
Justina,   431-3 

Karnak,  559 

Khirgeh,  559 

Kid,  393 

Kidney,  294 

King,  prediction  for,  17,  66;  to 
gain  favor  of,  19,  67,  71,  89, 
294;  magic  power  of,  83,  476, 
479;  and  alchemy,  13,  195 

Kiss,  88,  391,  589 

Knife,  545,  722,  727 ;  surgical,  149 

Knot,  in  divination,  7;  other 
magic,  19,  25,  66,  69,  71,  592,  661 

Kruno,  a  star,  346 

Labartu,  18 

Laboratory,   228 

Lacedaemon,  429,  602 

Ladder,  368 

Laelius,  274 

Lamb,  561,  769 

Lamia,  263 

Lamp,  129,  380;  experiment  with, 
55 ;  inextinguishable,  marvelous, 
etc.,  192,  214,  231,  239;  and  see 
Candle 

Land  and  water  on  earth's  sur- 
face, 54,   105,  254,  488 

Language  of  birds  and  beasts, 
learning,  257,  261,  294-5,  430 

Laodicea,  unguent  of,  133 

Lar,  80,  546 

Laser,  a  simple,  83 

Laurel,  229,  324,  332,  424,  571,  588 

Lavinian  grove,  326 

Law,  and  magic,  2,  6,  95 ;  Roman, 
167-8,  224,  233-4,  277,  527,  568; 
of  nature,  272,  350,  530-1 ;  Mo- 
saic,   395,    459;    national,    376; 


early  German,  593 ;  a  medieval 
lawsuit,  688 

Lead,  657,  757,  764;  application  of, 
574,  590;  glazing,  762;  tablets, 
28,  366,  724 

Leaves,  falling,  effect  on  dreams, 
206 

Lebadea,  249 

Lectionary,  476 

Lecture-notes,  134 

Leech,  724 

Left,  hand  etc.  used  or  preferred, 
65-6,  78,  82,  88,  90,  92,  173,  216, 
231,  325,  Zi^,  580,  583,  591-2,  722, 
726 

Legends  of  saints,  chaps,  xvi, 
xviii,  637;  and  see  names  of  in- 
dividuals 

Legislation,  2,  25,  59,  95,  126,  194, 
293,  415,  505;  and  see  Law 

Lentils,  369 

Lemnos,   130-2,  154,  242,  264 

Lent,  678 

Leopard,  256 

Leprosy,  171,  219,  390,  392,  536 

Letter,  see  Alphabet,  Vowel 

Lettuce,  639 

Lever,  192 

Leviathan,    346-7,   367 

Levitation,  251-2,  394,  427 

Libanotis,  an  herb,  495 

Libation,  431 

Libraries,  ancient,  15,  27,  125,  134- 
5;  medieval,  617-8,  743 

Ligatures  and  suspensions,  65,  68, 
70-2,  80,  89-90,  94,  173,  175,  204, 
279,  294,  572,  579,  591,  598,  611, 
614,  654-6,  726,  729-30,  740, 
755-6,  759;  condemned,  512,  630 

Light,  191,  488,  720;  and  see  Ra- 
diation 

Lightning,  71,  95,  102,  738 

Ligusticum,  613 

Like  cures  like,  68,  86,  94 

Lily,  68 

Linen,  use  of,  88,  90,  230,  249,  260, 
378,  560,  581,  598 

Liniment,   586 

Lion,  habits  and  traits,  74,  256, 
319,  326,  2,2>2,  367,  394,  636;  roar 
of,  491 ;  use  of  parts  of,  6y,  70, 
168,  279,  726,  755;  whelps  of, 
255,  491;  amours  of  lioness,  74; 
figure  of,  582 ;  made  by  magic, 
215 ;   lion-faced,  364 

Liparaios,  a  gem,  295 

Litany,  721 

Liturgy,   398,   476 

Liver,    disease,    536,    591 ;    divina- 


798 


GENERAL  INDEX 


tion,  17,  25,  249,  272,  313,  318, 

430,  458,  466 
Lizard,  68,  92,  238,  324,  494,  574, 

581,  589-91 
Logic,   154-5,   157-9;  magic,   lo-i, 

72,  214 
'Logos,  doctrine  of,  350 
Loigaire,  king,  640 
Lollianus   Avitus,   223 
Lollianus  Mavortius,  5256?.,  537 
Longevity,   141,   170,   176,  207,  537 
Looking  around,   591 
Loosing  bonds,  etc.,  265,  416,  449, 

779 

Lord's  Prayer,  598,  721,  724-6, 
729-30,  736 

Lot-casting,  77,  112,  539,  727;  and 
see  Geomancy  and  Series  sanc- 
torum  (other  index) 

Lotapes,  a  magician,  59 

Lot's  wife,  583 

Love  charms  and  potions,  22,  76, 
94,  201,  215,  217,  236,  258,  295, 
368,  370 

Lucifer,  636 

Lucius,  hero  of  Golden  Ass,  chap, 
vii 

Lucius  Verus,  emperor,  124 

Lucullus,  94,  201 

Lumbago,  90,  175 

Luna,  goddess,  236,  417;  and  see 
Helen,  Simon's 

Lunacy,  536,  727,  754;  and  see  In- 
sanity 

Lung,  148,  536,  727 

Lupin,  722 

Lutheran,  447 

Lychnis  and  Lychnites,  a  gem, 
257,  295 

Lycia,  154,  325,  765 

Lycurgus,  283 

Lynx,  81,  325,  620 

Lyre,  356 

Macedon,  278,  560 

Machine,  182,  187;  and  see  Me- 
chanical 

Maerotis,  lake,  349 

Magi,  in  Pliny,  64-72,  80,  84;  of 
Persia  and  the  east,  228,  235-6, 
247,  250,  266,  295,  352,  416,  450, 
763 ;  who  came  to  the  Christ 
child,  372,  396,  443-4,  471-9,  S06, 
518-9,  730 

Magic  (only  leading  passages 
where  magic  in  general  is  dis- 
cussed under  that  name  are  here 
included),  preliminary  defini- 
tion, 4-6;  primitive,  5-6;  Egyp- 


tian, 7-12;  Babylonian  and  As- 
syrian, 15-9,  33 ;  Greek  and  Ro- 
man, 20-8 ;  Pliny,  44,  58-64 ;  Plu- 
tarch, 203;  Apuleius,  234-7; 
Philostratus,  247-50;  Neo- 
Platonists,  299-300;  Enoch,  343; 
Philo,  352 ;  heretics  and  Gnos- 
tics, 361 ;  church  fathers,  414-20, 
chap,  xix,  466-9,  chap,  xxii; 
Nectanebus,  560;  Isidore,  628- 
30;  Alkindi,  643-6;  as  an  art  or 
discipline,  312,  420,  443;  relation 
to  science  and  medicine,  60-64, 
236,  312,  330,  432,  511,  534-5, 
644 ;  use  of  materials,  65-70,  441, 
508;  procedure,  68-71,  506;  false 
and  illusive,  61,  418,  423-4,  431- 
2,  440,  464-8,  509 ;  evil  and  crim- 
inal, 61-2,  313,  344,  377,  431-2, 
439,  505,  539,  543 ;  good  or  natu- 
ral, 235,  352;  marvelous  results, 
66-7,  70-1,  506;  reality  of,  506; 
history  of,  58-9,  414-5,  628-9; 
immunity  from,  440,  448-9 

Magnet,  81,  85,  213,  469,  511,  581, 
636,  644,  657,  668,  765,  780 

Magnus  annus,  26,  180,  210,  333, 
372,  384,  456,  543 

Majoram,  490 

MaleHcium,  234-5,  381,  506,  603, 
629 

Mambres,  a  magician,  461 

Mana,  6 

Mandaeans,  383-4,  450 

Mandragora,  22,  231,  258,  597,  607, 
626,  740 

Manes,  a  kind  of  spirits,  546 

Manes  or  Mani,  founder  of  Man- 
icheism,  and  Manicheism,  381- 
2,  398,  409,  513 

Mansions   of    moon   or   sun,   693, 

713,  715 

Manlike,  259;  and  see  Divination 

Manuscripts,  of  Pliny,  51-2; 
Ptolemy,  106,  108-10;  Galen, 
134-5;  Gentile  da  Foligno,  164; 
Greek  alchemy,  194-6;  Apuleius, 
241 ;  Aelian,  322 ;  Solinus,  326- 
8;  Hermes  and  Enoch,  291,  340; 
Manichean,  383 ;  Apocrypha, 
387-9;  Recognitions,  40iff. ; 
Basil  and  Ambrose,  484;  Physi- 
ologus,  498fif. ;  Firmicus,  532 ; 
and  Book  III  passim 

Maps,  107,  114,  707 

Marble,  729 

Marcus  Aurelius,  emperor,  124-5, 
130,    148 

Marcus  the  heretic,  369-70 


GENERAL  INDEX 


799 


Marcus  of   Memphis,   381 

Mare,  87,  324,  332,  511 

Marinus,  duke  of  Campania,  557 

Market-place,   magic   of,  437,  440 

Marriage,  685,  688 

Mars,  planet,  78,  97,  184 

Marsi,  172,  511 

Martin  of  Tours,  St.,  381 

Martyr  and  Martyrdom,  428,  433, 
512,  555 

Mary  Magdalene,  364 

Mary,  Virgin,   390,  724 

Mass,  sacrament  of,  13,  722 

Mathematical  method,  107 

Mathematics,  154,  535-6 

Mathematicus,  464,  513,  532,  534, 
632,  717,  781 

Mathesis,  411,  632,  704 

Matter,  iii,  199,  305,  309,  349,  487, 
542,  643,  763 

Mavortius,  see  Lollianus 

Maximilian  II,  emperor,  607 

Maximus,  emperor,  381 

Meal,  314;  evening,  482 

Measles,  668 

Measurement,  144;  and  see  In- 
struments, Time 

Meat  offered  to  idols,  452 

Mecca,  337 

Mechanical  devices  and  toys,  167, 
426;  Applied  Science;  and  see 
Bird,  mechanical ;  Machine 

Mede  and  Medea,  21,  65,  215,  295, 
324,  329,  780 

Medicine,  chaps,  iv.  xxv,  xxxi, 
xxxii,  289,  535-6,  542;  Egypt, 
10-2;  Babylonian  and  Assyrian, 
18;  and  magic,  25,  70,  and  see 
Magic;  Pliny,  72;  Greek,  318; 
Apuleius,  221,  237;  Brahmans, 
252-3 ;  Lucian,  279,  284 ;  Solinus, 
329 ;  church  fathers  and  theolo- 
gians, 460-3,  593,  617 ;  and  see 
Animal,  remedies  employed  by; 
Astrological ;  Compound ;  Dis- 
ease ;  History ;  Pharmacy ; 
Poison ;  Simple ;  etc. 

Medicine  man,  5,  227 

Medinet  Habu,  559 

Medium,  297,  467 

Medulla,  660 

Mela,  see   Taxo 

Melancholy,  137,  536,  756 

Melanteria,   132 

Melothesia,  712 

Memory,  303,  660 

Memphis,  198,  430 

]\Ienander  the  heretic,  368,  421 

!vlenippus,   263 


Menstrual  fluid,  82,  369,  573 

Merchant,  214,  245,  710 

Mercury,  god,  233,  236,  630,  and 
see  Hermes ;  metal,  764,  and 
see  Quicksilver;  planet,  318,  383 

Meroe,  a  witch,  226 

Merovingian,  616,  672 

Mesraim,  first  magician,  414 

Messiah,  355,  383 

Messina,  445,  710 

Metal  and  Metallurgy,  44,  102,  198, 
346,  463,  767;  and  see  Alchemy; 
Planets  and ;  and  the  names  of 
individual  metals 

Metamorphosis,  see  Transforma- 
tion 

Meteor,  103 

Meteorology,  44,  636 

Methodism,  in  medicine,   155,  735 

Michael,  an  angel,  367,  447,  452 

Michael,  bishop  of  Tarazona,  652 

Microcosm,  382,  411,  530,  633,  709, 
712 

Midday,  see  Noon 

Middle  Ages,  influence  in,  of 
Pliny,  5 1-3,  56,  73,  85,  595,  628, 
635;  Seneca,  100;  Ptolemy,  109; 
Galen,  161,  180,  572-4;  Hero, 
188;  De  placitis  philosophorum, 
180 ;  Apollonius,  267 ;  Solinus, 
326 ;  early  Christian  literature, 
338;  Enoch,  340-2;  Philo,  351; 
Apocrypha,  389-90 ;  Simon 
Magus,  427;  legends  of  saints, 
435;  Basil,  484;  Physiologus, 
497ff'. ;  Augustine,  504 ;  Alexan- 
der legend,  chap,  xxiv;  post- 
classical  medicine,  571,  576-8, 
584;  Ethicus,  601-4;  Diosco- 
rides,  606-12;  Boethius,  618- 
20;  Isidore,  623,  630-1;  Arabic 
learning,  646,  663,  chap,  xxx, 
732;  Constantinus  Africanus, 
743.  754 ;  Greek  _  learning,  734 ; 
and  see  Classical  heritage; 
Greek,  medieval ;  Textual  his- 
tory;   Translation 

Midnight,  248 

Milan,  477 

Mildew,  80 

Milesian  tales,  225 

Milk,  cow's.  229,  295;  woman's, 
82,  175,  587,  729,  759,  763;  other, 
721,  767 

Milk-stone,  294 

Milo,  779 

Milt,  see  Spleen 

Mind,  210,  531,  654 

Mine  and  Mining,  132,  142,  344 


2500 


GENERAL  INDEX 


Mineralogy,  606 

Minerva,  79 

Minotaur,  603,  636 

Mint,  wild,  S7 

Miracle,  8,  2^7,  541,  637,  686;  dis- 
tinguished from  magic,  242,  265, 
387-8,  417,  437-9,  465,  505;  by 
heretics,  507-8 

Mirror,  180,  236,  417,  468,  644; 
and  see  Divination  by  polished 
surfaces.  Optics 

Missal,   759 

Misy,  132 

Mistletoe,  23,  79 

Mithra,  368,  429 

Mithrobarzanes,  a  magician,  281 

"Modern,"  717 

Mohammed  and  Mohammedan, 
139,  22)7,  356,  445,  Chap,  xxviii, 
688 

Mole,   63,   67,    70,   80-1,   88,    409, 

494,  587 

Monastery,  Monasticism,  and 
Monk,  505,  637-9,  679 

Monkey,  148 

Monreale   427 

Monster,  627 

Mont,  temple  of,  559 

Montaster,  an  herb,  598 

Monte  Cassino,  597,  610,  743ff. 

Month,  specified,  585,  588,  590,  676, 
685-9,  728,  72,7,  77 a;  and  see 
Moon,  observance  of 

Montpellier,   109,  741 

Monument,  565 

Moon,  addressed,  727 ;  affected  by 
magic,  203,  225,  280,  308,  468, 
492 ;  controls  generation  and 
corruption,  210,  219,  354,  633, 
708;  day  of  the,  79,  572,  chap. 
xxix;  duration  of,  180,  702; 
and  Easter,  521 ;  observance  of, 
69-71,  78,  80,  90-1,  98,  178,  216, 
283,  322,  324,  333,  364,  539,  580, 
582,  590-2,  598-9,  chap,  xxix, 
720,  724,  729,  756,  780;  relation 
to  other  planets  and  to  the 
signs,  179,  211;  spots  on,  354; 
size  of,  488;  and  see  Bleeding, 
Luna,  Selene,  Tide 

Moon-earth,  765 

Moon-god,  382 

Moon-stone,  250 

Moon-tree,  564 

Moralizing,   loi,  490,  638 

Mortar,  pounded  in  a,  82,  765 

Mortuary  magic,  8-9 

Mosaic,  367,  427,  764 

Mosaic  law,  see  Law 


Moses,  see  other  index 

Mother,  goddess  or  Great,  216,  360 

Mouse,  23,  80,  166,  175,  213,  325, 
491,  587,  7:57;  field-,  98,  279; 
shrew-,  7^,  86,  88 

Mountain,  marvelous,  346-7;  mag- 
netic, 756;  affected  by  magic, 
226,  416 

Mule,  88,  183,  390,  589,  736 

Mullein,  490 

Muscle,  145,  150,  580 

Muses,  371 

Mushroom,  219 

Music,  319,  325,  534,619,  744;  and 
magic,  6;  and  medicine,  124;  and 
architecture,  185 ;  of  the  spheres, 
26,    184,   193,   371,  487,  544,  622 

Mutton-fat,  722 

Mycenaean    art,    301 

Myriogenesis,  537 

Myrnvecia,  a  gem,  166 

Myrrh,  586,  765 

Mysia,  216 

Mysteries,  139,  216,  221,  223,  243, 
245,  248,  317,  360-1,  368,  377,  428- 
g;  and  see  Eleusis,  Mithra 

Mysticism,   211,   254-5,   677,   763 

Mythology,  and  magic,  8,  21 ;  and 
astrology,  16,  282-3;  miscel- 
laneous, 211,  215,  282,  294,  327, 
407,  41 5-6,  545-6,  620 

Nail,  metal,  78,  81,  87,  90,  280,  581, 
722 

Nail  parings,  toe  and  finger,  71, 
581 

Names,  see  of  Christ  and  God, 
and  Words,  power  of 

Nannacus,  see  Annacus 

Nard,  169 

Nativities,  25,  95,  104,  115,  185, 
471,  559-60,  632,  679,  712 

Nature,  Pliny  on,  42,  46-7;  Sen- 
eca, loi ;  Galen,  150-1 ;  as  a 
teacher,  155;  Plutarch,  210;  in 
contrast  to  fate,  375 

Neck,  stiff,  737 

Necromancy,  21,  197,  228,  233,  264, 
270,  280,  300,  419,  466,  539,  629, 
705 ;  as  proof  of  immortality, 
416 ;  relation  to  science,  744 

Nectabis,  463 

Nectanebo  or  Nectanebus,  chap, 
xxiv,  391,  463,  516,  704 

Needle,  copper,  590;  eye  of,  396 

Nektanebes,  Nekht  -  Har  -  ehbet, 
Nekhte-nebof,  558-9;  and  see 
Nectanebus 

Neo-Latin,  732,  757 


GENERAL  INDEX 


8oi 


Neo-PIatonism,  chap,  xi,  ii6,  208, 
296-7,  349.  540,  544-S,  661 

Nero,  emperor,  61,  171,  201,  260, 
262,   423-s,   553,  585 

Nerva,  emperor,  244 

Nerve  and  nervous  system,  145-6 

Nestorian,  554 

Nettle,  636,  768 

Neuri,   330 

Nias  Island,  170 

Niceta,  a  character  in  the  Recogni- 
tions, chap,  xvii 

Nicias,  22,  204 

Niello,  769 

Night-shade,  an  herb,  581 

Night  time  and  magic,  68,  78,  129, 
224-6,  234 

Nigromancy,  see  Necromancy 

Nikon,  father  of  Galen,  122 

Nile,  102,  179-80,  198,  254,  559; 
horses,   169 

Nimrod  and  magic,  413 

Nine,  88,  371,  590,  592,  598,  721, 
727 

Nineveh,  243 

Nitrate,  772 

Nitro-muriatic  acid,  772 

Noah's  ark,  20;  and  see  Flood 

Noon,  248,   755 

Norman  and  Normandy,  427,  745 

Nose,    576,    589 

Notebook,  45-6;  and  see  Lecture 
notes 

Notory  art,  267 

Nude  and  Nudity,  83,  93,  295,  565, 
588 

Numa,    king,    274,    505 

Number,  observance  of,  and 
theory  of  perfect,  26,  69,  91,  178, 
212,  258,  273,  317,  355-7,  370,  373, 
383,  430,  441,  521,  544-5,  621,  627, 
675 ;  and  see  Five,  Four,  Nine, 
Seven,    Ten,    Three 

Numitor,   king,  602 

Nymph,  546 

Oak,  493 

Oath,  430 

Obelisk,    558 

Obscenity  in  magic  and  medicine, 
61-2,    167-8,  204,  207,  236 

Observation,  Pliny,  48,  53-4; 
magicians,  64-5 ;  Ptolemy,  105, 
107,  no,  112;  Galen,  156;  re- 
puted Chaldean,  95,  316;  Dios- 
corides,  606;  and  see  Experi- 
mental   method 

Obstetrics,   see  Child-birth 

Occult  virtue,  discussions  of  and 


references  to  of  a  general  char- 
acter, in  Egypt,  10;  Pliny,  64-5, 
75-6,  81,  89;  Galen,  169-70; 
Vitruvius,  183;  Plutarch,  212-3; 
Neo-Platonists,  304,  307,  311, 
320,  542-3;  Brahmans,  257-8; 
Marbod,  778-81 ;  miscellaneous, 
441,  454,  468-9 

Ocean,  489 

Ocimum,  an  herb,  93 

Oculist,   284,   670 

Odor,   foul,  536 

Odysseus,  264,  281,  509,  629 

Oea,  222ff. 

Oil,  68,  90,  92,  130,  142,  154,  168-9, 
171,  175,  213,  256,  373,  572,  606, 
724,  779 

Ointment,    see   Unguent 

Old-v^fives,  166,  204,  234,  250,  272, 
586 ;   and  see  Witch 

Olybrius,   emperor,  606 

Olympias,  mother  of  Alexander, 
56off. 

Olympic  games,  22,  102 

Olympus,  Mt.,  198,  296,  429 

Omens  and  portents,  14,  92,  178, 
201,  231,  251,  254,  260,  318,  430, 
471,  543,  560,  562,  675 

One,  Once,  for  the  first  time,  82, 
92,  210,  582 

Onesiphorus,  396 

Onion,  20 

Onoel,  a  spirit,  367 

Ophites,  a  marble,  87 

Ophites,  a  sect,  365,  383 

Opium,  724, 

Opobalsam,   128 

Optics,   108,  218,  237,  276,  669 

Oracle,  21,  95,  203,  206-7,  253,  278, 
295,  318,  432,  442,  466,  534,  627 

Oratory,  535,  776 

Ordeal,   386,   468,  759 

Oreites,  a  gem,  295 

Orestes,   324 

Oreus,    365 

Organ,   musical,    187-8,    192 

Oriental  attitude,  exaggerated  es- 
timate of,  20-1,  388 

Originality,    569,    575,    616 

Origanum,  an  herb,  218 

Origenists,    461,    519 

Oromazes,  a  magician,  236 

Orphic  rites,  296,  429 

Osiris,  13,  196,  223,  233,  546 

Ossifrage,  87 

Ostrich,  636 

Ouroboros,  the  encircling  serpent, 
197,  763 

Owl,  63,  68,  70,  253 


802 


GENERAL  INDEX 


Ox,  468,  722,  755 
Oxford,  642 
Oxygen,    143 
Oyster,  218 

Padua,  164 

Paeanites,  a  gem,  329 

Paganism,  203,  294,  317,  327,  512, 

chap,  xxiv,  661-2 
Painting,    177,    187,   764 
Palatine  hill,  125,  134 
Palermo,  427 
Palestine,    132,    280,    438 
Palimpsest,    553 
Palm,  62,  230,  333,  636 
Pamphile,  a  witch,  229ff. 
Pamphylia,  132 
Pan,  the  god,  251,  546 
Panacea,   172 

Pancrates,  a  magician,  280-1 
Pantarhe,  252 
Panther,    74,   256 
Papacy,  705 ;    see   Sixtus   IV   for 

patronage  of  learning  by 
Papyri,   12,   14,  22,  27-8,   193,   196, 

365,  467,  686 
Paradise,  367,  470,  488 
Paralysis,  739;   of  the  face,  738; 

tongue,    755 
Parchment,   589,  729,  764 
Pard,  74,    168 
Paris,  642 
Parrot,  575 
Parthians,  ^73,  376 
Partridge,   16%.  324,   574 
Pastoral   magic,   70 
Paternoster,  see  Lord's  Prayer 
Pathology,  576 
Paul  the  apostle,  405,  413,  424,  449, 

505;  potion  of,  739 
Peacock,    574,   636 
Pebble,   591 
Pelican,  324 
Pella,   278 

Penalty,  293,  313,  433 
Penance,   513 
Pendant,   301 

Peony,  78,  173,  614,  740,  756 
Pepper,   169,  176,  256,  586,  637 
Pergamum,  122,  124,  130,  136,  149, 

171,  236 
Peristereos,  an  herb,  yy 
Persecution,   fear  of,   194 
Persia   and    Persian,    58,    66,    376, 

451,  475,  479,  S03,  553,  558,  744. 

762 
Personification,   198,  343 
Perspective,  see  Optics 
Peru,  7,   17 


Peter  the  apostle,  .231,  chap  xvii, 
505 

Petroselinon,  132 

Phaethon,    283 

Phalangium,   an   insect,  86 

Phallic  ritual,  308 

Phantasm  and  Phantom,  see  Ap- 
parition,   Ghost 

Phanuel,   an  angel,  342 

Pharaoh's  dream,  358;  magicians, 
379,  38s,  417,  438,  446,  464,  470, 
506-8,  629 

Pharmacy  and  Pharmacology,  10, 
20,  83,  122,  133,  343,  413,  434, 
610,   734-5 

Phidias,  24,  407 

Philae,  559 

Philip  of  Macedon,  331,  s6off. 

Philoctetes,  294 

Philology,   535,   545 

Philosopher's  stone,  52,  197,  398, 
762^ ;   and   see  Alchemy 

Philosophy,  Greek,  21 ;  and  al- 
chemy, 13,  199;  and  magic,  24, 
61,  234,  246^  310,  440,  535;  and 
astrology,  674;  and  business,  97; 
Seneca,  103;  Galen  and  pseudo- 
Galen,  123-4,  127,  ^22,,  139,  146, 
149-50,  176,  180;  Vitruvius,  185- 
6;  other  mentions  of,  220,  223, 
279,  360,  416,  466,  471,  481,  485, 
493,  536,  620,  707 ;  and  see  names 
of  individuals  (largely  in  other 
index)  and  schools. 

Phlebotomy,  see  Bleeding 

Phoebus,  620;  and  see  Apollo 

Phoenicia,  438 

Phoenix,  207,  257,  332-3,  347,  460 

Phraotes,  258 

Phrygia  and  Phrygian,  206,  430, 
597,  630 

Phylactery,   513 

Physica,  512,  579-80 

Physics,    644 

Physiognomy,  26,  176,  179,  460, 
668 

Physiology,   145,   395,  657-60 

Pig,  76,  85,  168,  219,  393,  587,  727, 
729,  764,  766;  and  see  Swine 

Pill,  739 

Pillow,  beneath  one's,  90 

Pine-tree,    490,    493 

Piper,  217 

Pirronius,  a  magician,  604 

Piston,  192 

Place,  observed  in  magic,  645 

Plagiarism,  186,  483,  649,  742,  746-7 

Plague,  Galen  and,  124,  142,  171 ; 
of    1348  A.D.,    164;    Apollonius 


GENERAL  INDEX 


803 


and,  259,  391 ;  of  542  A.D.,  575 ; 

of  Egypt,  325,  357,  491,  522,  68s, 
687,  696 ;  miscellaneous,  410,  432, 
,  538-9,  600 

Planetary  week,  16,  513,  633 
Planets,  when  distinguished?  13-4, 
16;  properties  of,  97,  113-4,  346, 
3S3,  526,  529,  662,  711;  in  Gnos- 
ticism, 361;  in  art,  379;  and  the 
metals,  347,  368,  709,  762,,  767; 
and  herbs,  291 ;  position  at  crea- 
tion, 711,  713;  and  formation  of 
foetus,  see  Child-birth 

Plate,  metal,  229,  386,  572,  582 

Platonism,  221,  243,  456;  for  Plato 
see  other  index 

Pleiades,   179,  355,  636 

Pleurisy,    738 

Plough,  80 

Pneumatics,   188 

Poetry,  6,  95,  5ii,.53S 

Poison  and  Poisoning,  relation  to 
magic,  25,  61,  441 ;  to  medicine, 
56;  venomous  human  beings, 
324;  safeguards  against,  67,  70-1, 
386,  614,  and  see  Antidote ;  mis- 
cellaneous, 81,  86-7,  231-2,  397, 
417,  460,  535,  56s,  572,  574,  668, 
721,  722 

Polar  star,  384 

Polion,  an  herb,  yj 

Politics,  358,  666 

Pompholyx,   132 

Pontianus,  223-4 

Pontiff,  124,  149 

Pontus,  drugs  from,  87,  132 

Poplar,  90 

Poppy,  bearing  stones,  216 

Population,   136 

Pork,    142 

Pot-herbs,  606 

Potter  and  Potterjj  384,  433, 
588-9  . 

Praestigium,  630,  665 

Praetor,  538 

Prayer,  12,  79,  104,  219,  233,  382, 
398,  412,  423,  426,  443,  457,  530-1, 
589,  64s,  671,  705,  728;  procuring 
answer  to,  70,  294,  593,  779;  by 
others  than  man,  457 ;  to  others 
than  God,  260,  264,  303,  526,  598- 
9,  661 ;  of  St.  John,  721 ;  and  see 
Lord's  Prayer,  Incantation 

Predestination,  514 

Prefect,  526 

Pregnant  stone,  740 

Presbyter,   437 

Prescription,  medical,  152,  159, 
17? 


Presentation, '  literary  and  scien- 
tific, 570,  595,  625 

Prester,  John,  477 

Priest,  9,  13,  15,  21,  79,  85,  131, 
195,  197,  300,  386,  533,  754,  763, 
766 

Priscillianists,  478,  519 

Private  parts,  343,  536 

Procharus,   397 

Procons,ul,  235,  527 

Professions,  learned,  5,  125-6,  186- 

7'   744  .      . 
Prognostication,  medical,  164 
Prophecy  and  Prophet,  25,  77,  205, 

230,  352,  370,  439,  447,  459,  465, 

476,  479.  534 
Proteus,  263 

Psychology,  75,  144-5,  657-60 
Ptah-Seker-Ausar,  233 
Ptolemais,  541 

Ptolemy,  king  of  Egypt,  135 
Pulse,  144-5,  430,  658 
Pump,    187,   192 
Punic,  597 
Puppy,    see    Dog 
Purging,  667;  the  lungs,  143 
Purification,  62,  204,  232,  441,  531, 

598 
Purple,  173,  197-8,  590-1,  604 
Push-ball,  487 
Pylades,   144-5 
Pyrethrum,  an  herb,  614 
Pyrigoni,  324 
Pyrites,  571,  768 
Pyromancy,  260,  629 
Pyrrhus,  83 
Pytho,  629 
Pythagorean,  26,  32,  50,  58,  61,  6z, 

65-6,  179,  184,  243,  258,  260,  280, 

370,  456,  544 

Quail,  490 

Quadrivium,    632 

Qualities,    the    four,    114,    139-40, 

154,  157,  218,  48s,  751,  755;  and 

see   Cold,   Heat 
Quartan  fever,  269,  579-81,  7^6 
Quaternities,  divine,  674 
Quick-lime,  434,  571 
Quinsy,  77,  89 
Quintus  Cicero,  269ff. 

Rabbi,  355,  445,  470 

Rabbit,  588,  729 

Race,  184,  781 ;  for  strange  races 

see  Hyperboreans,  Seres,  etc. 
Radiation  of  force  or  light,  643-6 
Radish,   721 
Rainbow,  409 


8o4 


GENERAL  INDEX 


Rain-making,    23-4,    103,    386,   430 
Rain-water,   81-2 
Ram,  213,  332,  424,  467 
Raphael,  the  angel,  342,  367,  447. 

452,  454 
Rat,  76 

Ravenna,    2^y,    "jdz 
Raymond,   archbishop  of   Toledo, 

657 

Reading,  medieval,  604,  617-8 

Reason,  218,  660;  free  from 
magic,  300;  and  experience,  157 

Red,  used,  65,  581,  598,  740 

Red   Sea,  84,  208 

Redeemer,  361,  363,  438 

Reed,  75-6,  80,  90,  215,  591,  726 

Reformed  churches,  447 

Reggio,  445,  745 

Relics  of  saints,  444,  446,  593,  675 

Religion,  and  magic,  5-6,  8-9,  15, 
18,  20,  22-3,  33-4,  60,  232,  256, 
505.  533;  and  astrology,  iS-7, 
524,  529-31 ;  and  science,  407-8, 
479,  chap,  xxi ;  other  than  Chris- 
tian, 94,  361,  725,  and  see  Mo- 
hammedanism, Paganism,  etc. ; 
medieval  religious  attitude,  746, 
752;  and  see  Christianity,  God, 
Theology,  Trinity,  etc. 

Renaissance,  20,  122,  570,  618 

Reseda,  an  herb,  93 

Respiration,  see  Breathing 

Resurrection  of  the  body,  47,  41S. 

541 
Resuscitation  of  corpses,  280,  391, 

394,   397,   424,   426,   638,   763 
Revelation,  56,  253,  407;   and  see 

Divination  by 
Revolutions,  astrological,  26,  377, 

650 
Rhetoric,    124,   221,   269,   483,   518, 

533,  535,  555,  596,  603,  700 
Rhodes,  269,  301 
Rhododendron,  175 
Rhubarb,  first  mention  of,  576 
Riddles,    636 
Right  hand,  etc.,  used  or  preferred, 

70,  78,  81,  83,  88,  90,  92,  324-5, 

332,  574,  580-1,  591-2,  767 
Ring,   69,    78,    173,    219,    251,   253, 

280,  292,  379,  564,  582,  590,  592, 

599,  656,  662,  70s,  755 
Ring-worm,  93 
Rip  van  Winkle,  399 
Ritual,  12,  23 ;  and  see  Ceremonial 
Roads,   Roman,   135-6 
Robber,  117 
Robert,  king  of  France,  672.  704, 

736 


Robert  Guiscard,  745 

Romance,  Greek,  22,  221,  232,  553; 
Medieval,   557 

Romanesque,  502 

Romans,  traits  of,   184 

Rome,  as  center  of  learning,  124, 
128-31,  135,  162,  201,  222,  242, 
269,  277,  537,  586,  741;  other 
mentions,  209,  230,  366,  372,  403, 
408,  421,  423-4,  464,  553 

Romulus,  209,  274,  330,  602 

Root,  see  Herb 

Rose,  230,  751 ;  wild,  56 

Royal  Society,  214 

Rubbing,  142 

Ruddy  complexion,  768-71 

Rue,  737 ;  eaten  by  weasel,  74,  324, 
626 

Ruin,  excavated,  762 

Russet,  89 

Rust,  766 

Rustic,  experience,  578,  585 

Sabaoth,   365,   367,  379,  45i,   583, 

599 
Sabbath,  204,  513 
Sabians,  661-3 
Saccrdos,  235 
Sacra  Via,  125,  133,  424 
Sacrifice,  68,  79,  104,  131,  166,  215, 

248,  250-1,  261,  294-5,  308-9,  317, 

363,    414,    431,    645,    661-3,    705; 

human,    62,   207,    249,   418,   539, 

687 
Sacrum  amarwm,  739 
Saffron,  656,  765 
Sagmina,  sacred  herbs,  76 
St.  Gall,  640,  677 
St.  Sophia,  575,  770 
Sakkara,  9 
Salamander,   54,  68,  85,   214,   324, 

511,  636;  "wool,"  214 
Salerno,  chaps,  xxxi,  xxxii 
Salisatores,  630 
Saliva,  20,  82,  88-9,  92-3,  174,  281, 

273,  392,  573,  588,  592,  656,  769 
Salmon,  424 
Salt,  213,  373,  467,  583,  670;  and 

see  Holy,  Sodom 
Saltus  Gilhcrii,  705 
Salve,  S7,  606,  722 
Salvia,  739 

Samaria,  363-4,  368,  421 
Samothracian  orgies,  149 
Samuel,  ghost  of,  see  Endor,  witch 

of 
Sandal-Makers,  street  of,  134 
Sandals,  230 
Sandastros,  a  gem,  97 


GENERAL  INDEX 


80s 


Sapphire,  496,  779 

Saracen,  138,  718 

Sarcophagus,  476 

Sard,  777 

Sardinia,  329 

Sardis,  255 

Sardonia,  an  herb,  329 

Sardonic  laugh,  329 

Satire,  285 

Saturn,  god,  207;  planet,  97,  184, 
580,  622,,  768 

Saturninus,  a  heretic,  372 

Satyr,  263-4,  546 

Saul,  448,  469 

Scarab,  10,  68,  Z2,Z 

Scarification,  721 

Scepticism,  see  Credulity  and 

Sciatica,  69 

Scientific  spirit,  curiosity,  etc.,  144, 
234,  308,  378-9,  437,  485-6,  494, 
502-4,  528,  535,.  559,  669,  752; 
and  see  Experiment,  Observa- 
tion 

Scipio  Orfitus,  223 

Scorpion,  74,  81,  85-8,  171,  174,  494, 
573,  583,  656,  666 

Scotland,  654 

Scrofula,  82,  89,  91,  587 

Sculpture,  277,  501 

Scylla,  the  monster,  263,  636;  an 
herb,  526 

Scythian,  59,  77,  245,  407,  496,  654 

Sea,  225,  738 ;  and  see  Bath 

Sea-calf,  580;  faring,  245;  foam, 
468;  gull,  159;  hare,  171,  236, 
238,  587;  holly,  213;  serpent, 
325,  574;  star,  89;  urchin,  68, 
490-1 

Seal  of  Diana,  130 

Sealing,  69,  278,  468 

Seasons,  four,  114 

Secrecy,  194,  227,  233,  239,  254,  287, 
29s,  372,  40s,  420,  579,  765.  776 

Seed,  605 ;  seedless  herbs,  489 

Seia,  599 

Selene,  215 

Selenomancy,  98 

Semen,  369 

Semitic,  15 

Semo  Sancus,  421 

SenedoH,  an  herb,  614 

Sense   and    Senses,    150,    158,    180, 

355 
Sepia,   87 
Septimius   Severus,   emperor,  243, 

253,  293 ;  and  see  Severi 
Septizonium,  253 
Serapis,  379,  442,  763 
Seres,  376,  402,  412-4 


Serf  and  Servant,  739;  and  see 
Colonus;  Slavery 

Sermon,  426,  482!?. 

Serpent,  lifted  up  in  the  wilder- 
ness, 379;  and  see  Snake, 
Dragon,  Sea-serpent 

Sesame,  655 

Sethians,  365 

Sethos,  14 

Seven,  14,  16,  49,  67,  69,  169,  179, 
198,  212,  232,  253,  258,  279,  282, 
318,  333,  346,  355-6,  365,  2,7^,  373, 
376,  378,  383,  385,  411,  429,  435. 
491,  522,  537,  545,  581,  590,  592, 
599,  633,  676,  724,  771,  777 

Seven  sleepers,  725,  759 

Severi,  dynasty  of,  125,  130;  and 
see  Septimius 

Sevres,  762 

Sex,  observed  in  magic,  69,  78, 
80-2,  94,  729,  759;  of  hyena,  397; 
of  herbs  and  stones,  81,  764;  of 
numbers,  179,  371 ;  of  planets 
and  signs,  282,  662,  709-12;  pre- 
dicted, 175-6,  516;  intercourse, 
141,  639,  7(>7 

Shadow,  605 

Shadow-footed,  256 

Shark,  494 

Shaving  the  head,  142,  560,  724 

Sheba,  479 

Sheep,  68,  102,  168,  173,  219,  467, 
490,  582,  656;  the  lost,  363;  and 
see  Lamb,  Ram,  Shepherd,  Pas- 
toral 

Shellfish,  98,  517 

Shepherd,  478 

Ship,  604 ;  wreck,  748 

Shirt,  581 

Shoe,  638 

Short-hand,    134,  232 

Showbread,  385 

Sibyl,  546 ;  for  Sibylline  books  see 
other  index 

Sicily,  85,  427,  52s 

Sideritis,  a  stone,  295 

Sieve,  91,  250,  325 

Signatures,  310 

Sign,  see  Abbreviation,  Divination, 
Prognostication,  Sex  predicted, 
Star,  Zodiac 

Silence  observed,  722 

Silas,  449 

Silk,  608 

Silvanus,  546 

Silver,  590,  599 

Similarity,  argument  from,  238, 
614 ;  and  see  Like  cures  like 

Simon  the  Canaanite,  392 


8o6 


GENERAL  INDEX 


Simon   Magus,   chap,   xvii,   362-5, 

397,  439 

Simon,  St.,  435 

Simples,  medicinal,  in  Pliny,  46, 
83;  Galen,  128,  153,  160,  168, 
571 

Sin,  344,  372-s,  430,  457,  520;  effect 
on  nature,  254,  345,  350,  409-10, 
490 

Sinew,  68,  148 

Siphon,  189,  191 

Siren,  263 

Sisebut,  king,  623 

Sisinnios,   398 

Six,   184,  356,  521 

Sixtus  IV,  pope,  349,  506 

Skeleton,  233 

Skin,  141,  769;  changing  one's,  170, 
238,  324;  disease,  102,  537;  see 
Animals,  parts  of ;  and  the 
names  of  particular  animals  for 
the  use  of  their  skins 

Skull,  80,  580 

Sky,  see  Heaven 

Slav,  658 

Slavery,  136,  170,  350,  515,  668, 
683 

Slavonic,  342,  345,  398 

Sleep,  magic,  399 

Sleight-of-hand,  370 

Slot-machine,  197 

Smallpox,  668 

Smilax,   92 

Smoke,  89,  615 

Smyrna,  123 

Snail,  89,  92,  586 

Snake,  remedies  against,  84-9,  99, 
17s,  258,  29s,  365,  386,  392,_  495, 
599,  614;  animals  antipathetic  to, 
84-S,  99,  231 ;  virtue  in,  23,  168, 
197;  of  India,  214,  564;  Satan 
and  demons  as,  365,  391,  430; 
charming,  83,  278-80,  325,  511, 
561-2,  638-9;  sting  and  venom 
of,  56,  81-2,  102,  foam  of,  67; 
sloughing  of,  170;  not  found  in 
Ismuc,  183 ;  at  Delphi,  283 ;  on 
a  pendant,  301 ;  medical  knowl- 
edge of,  441 ;  and  see  Fennel, 
tasted  by 

Sneeze,  divination  from,  95,  205, 
207 

Social  aspect  of  magic,  59;  life  in 
antiquity,  137,  185 

Socrates,  137,  139,  204,  234,  240, 
270,  288,  532 

Soda,  washing,  571 

Sodom,  salts  of,  138 

Soldier,  56-7 


Solemnity,  required  in  magic, 
644-6 

Solon,  326,  355 

Son  of  God,  372,  438 

Soot,  236 

Sopater,  313 

Sophist  and  Sophistry,  540-1 

Soporific,  758 

Sorcery, '  10,  25,  61,  96,  166,  270, 
279,  324,  344,  352,  386,  390,  393, 
437-8,  441,  655,  690,  73Z]  coun- 
ter-magic'against,  17-20,  70,  81, 
94,  301,  391,  600;  and  see  Goetia, 
Witchcraft 

Sortilegi,  630 

Sory,    132 

Soul,  human,  Plato  on,  25-6; 
Pliny,  47,  96;  Galen,  150,  178, 
180;  Plutanch,  206-7,  213,  ■217; 
Neo-Platonists,  309-10,  ,318; 
Gnostics,  364 ;  location  of,  735 ; 
apart  from  laody,  399,  418,  455, 
510,  546;  immortality  of,  416, 
419,  469,  531,  541 ;  other  than 
human,  198,  213;  and  see  World- 
soul 

Sound,  143,  201,  430,  542 

Sousnyos,  St.,  398 

Spain,  380,  433,  489,  580,  597,  607 

Spanish  era,  773 

Sparrow,  271 

Sparta  and  Spartan,  21-2,  216,  301 

Species,  304,  493,  751 

Speech,  impediment  of,  536 

Sphacra  barbaricce,  537 

Sphere,  sec  Earth,  Universe,  land 
other  index 

Spice,  250,  257,  295,  606 

Spider,  90,  94,  168-9,  I7i,  175,  5^7 

Spinal  cord,  146 

Spirit,  good  or  evil  (including 
angel  and  demon,  but  see  also 
Apparition,  Ghost,  Necromancy, 
Soul),  in  early  Arabic  poetry,  6; 
in  the  ancient  orient,  11,  15,  18-9, 
24;  classical  Greece,  24,  26, 
180-1 ;  on  nature  of,  Plutarch, 
203-4,  206-8;  Apuleius,  240; 
Philostratus,  263-4;  lamblichus, 
309-10;  Enoch,  343;  Origen  and 
Celsus,  441-3,  452-3;  Augustine, 
508;  Martianus  Capella,  545-6; 
Dionysius  the  Areopagite,  546-7; 
Christian  ascription  of  other 
religions  to  demons,  370,  414, 
42gf[.,  442,  453 ;  viisease  and, 
II,  18-9,  299,  343,  452,  722;  ex- 
pulsion of,  and  power  over,  253, 
262,    386,    405,    414,    417-8,    441, 


GENERAL  INDEX 


807 


443,  754,  779,  and  see  Exorcism ; 
fall  of,  343,  374-5;  familiar  and 
guardian,  207,  210,  368,  370;  in 
the  air,  206,  240,  424,  463,  508, 
635 ;  in  heavens  and  stars,  chap. 
XV,  343,  397,  431,  458,  487-8, 
519;  in  the  moon,  207;  in  na- 
ture, 181,  296,  308,  310,  347,  382, 
414,  430,  443,  452-4,  543;  invo- 
cation of,  301,  308,  310,  320, 
361,  367-8,  371-2  384,  419,  437, 
442,  447,  449-52,  543,  655,  674, 
and  see  Necromancy,  Notory 
art;  magic,  astrology,  arts  and 
sciences  ascribed  to,  195,  240, 
313,  343,  368,  370,  412,  414,  417- 
8,  422,  429-32,  441-3,  447-8,  453, 
458-9,  463,  465-6,  506-7,  509,  513, 
518,  629,  675,  705  ;  mediums  be- 
tween God  or  gods  and  men, 
206,  208,  240,  349,  452-4,  459, 
621,  675 ;  orders  of,  308-9,  320, 
363,  408,  455,  507,  545-7,  727; 
possessed  by,  308,  392,  413-4, 
434,  510,  640,  723-4,  754-5;  safe- 
guards against,  18,  216,  293,  391, 
398,  449,  615,  726,  728 

Spiritus,  147,  658-60 

Spit,  see  Saliva 

Spleen,  57,  68-9,  85,  536,  577,  579, 
584,  587-8,  591 

Spodium  or  Spodos,  132 

Sponge,  227 

Spoon,  721 

Spring,  vi^ater  229 ;  caused  to  flow^, 
769 ;  and  see  Fountain,  Seasons 

Staff,  252,  435,  679 

Stag,  84,  207,  294,  324;  and  see 
Deer 

Stained  glass,  427,  435,  770 

Stans,  the,  415 

Star,  nature  of,  god  or  animal, 
etc.,  25-6,  103,  206,  210,  212,  240, 
303,  315,  343-4,  353,  436,  456,  519- 
21,  530,  620-1,  632,  662,  670;  as 
sign,  302,  410,  458,  544;  not 
cause  of  evil,  305,  354,  475,  514; 
cause  of  evil,  411;  affected  by 
magic,  225-6;  shooting,  71,  589; 
fixed,  114;  and  see  Astrology; 
Christ,  birth  of;  Magi 

Star-fish,  56 

Starling,  490 

Statue,  91,  279,  280,  764;  healing, 
284;  animated,  188,  416-7,  424, 
435 ;  and  see  Image,  Sculpture 

Steam,  192 

Stele  of  Metternich,  559 

Stepmother,  215 


Stoic,  50,  141,  178-81,  210,  269-70, 
283,  350,  397,  456 

Stomach,  92,  173,  536,  592,  656,  757 

Stone,  the  disease,  87,  588,  729; 
and  see  Gem 

Stoning  to  death,  262,  399 

Storax,  a  gum,  495 

Stork,  257,  324-5,  331,  460,  580 

Storm-averting  magic,  71,  80,  92, 
102,  252,  313 

Stream,  91,  225-6,  546;  and  see 
Fountain 

Stupa,  251,  413 

Style,  literary,  222-3,  525,  570,  620 

Styx,   river,   326 

Suanir,  435 

Suffumigation,  see  Fumigation 

Suggestion,  force  of,  265 

Sulla,  532 

Sulphur,  279,  764 

Sumerian,  15,  17 

Summun  bonum,  752 

Sun,  god  and  worship,  97,  251,  261, 
294-5,  317-8,  382,  492,  524;  per- 
sonified, 347,  410,  457,  529;  and 
magic,  141,  225-7,  308,  386;  as- 
trological influence  of,  99,  179, 
211 ;  rising  and  dawn,  215,  230-1, 
256,  261 ;  before  sunrise,  69,  71, 
78,  91,  94,  131,  173,  281,  583,  599, 
768 ;  before  sunset,  583 ;  experi- 
ment with,  55;  dial,  185,  187; 
distance  and  size  of,  219,  488; 
tropical,  214 ;  tree  of,  564 

Superstition,  Plutarch  on,  203-4; 
in  medicine,  chaps,  xxv,  xxxi 

Surgery,  148-9,  536,  569,  668,  723, 

735 
Suriel,  a  spirit,  367 
Swaddling  cloth,  392,  396 
Swallow,   habits  of,  75,  324,  615, 

636 ;  use  of,  68,  70,  168,  175,  581, 

721 
Swallow-stone,  755,  766 
Swallow-wort,  75,  615,  626 
Swan,   636;    song,    255,   332 
Sweat,  167,  392,  767,  779 
Swine,  70,  77,  79,  99,  217;  and  see 

Pig 
Sword,  78,  295  ;  magic  258 
Sylvia,  404 
Symbol  and  Symbolism,  166,  251, 

310,     361,    367,     502,     506,    546, 

676-7,    679,    721 ;     in    alchemy, 

766-7,  771-2 
Sympathetic    magic,   68,   84-7,    92, 

238,  271,  296,  299,  304,  312,  314, 

320,  354,  542-3,  614 
Symposium,  137,  201-2 


8o8 


GENERAL  INDEX 


Symptoms,  72)S 

Syncretism,  525 

Synod  at  Rome,  389,  402 

Syracuse,  476 

Syria,  Syriac,  and  Syrian,  280, 
374,  387,  395,  403-4,  422,  437, 
497,  499,  503,  554,  559-6i,  577, 
597,  601,  661,  663,  747,  762 

Syrian  goddess,  231 

Syringe,  192 

Syrup,  560 

Tablecloth,  214 

Tables,  astronomical,  14;  of  con- 
tents, 50,  153 

Tablet,  astrological,  560,  563;  and 
see  Cuneiform,  Lead 

Taboo,  21 ;  and  see  Iron 

Tagus,  630 

Tamarisk,  85,  587 

Tape-worm,  first  mentioned,  576 

Tarpeian  rock,  426 

Tarquin  the  Proud,  602 

Tarrutius,  an  astrologer,  209,  330 

Tarsus,  259,  479 

Taste,  sense  of,  505 

Taxo,  600,  636 

Teiresias,  281 

Telines,  21 

Temperaments,  four,  668 

Temple,  533;  of  Peace,  125;  de- 
vices, 192-3;  in  alchemy,  197-8, 
763;  Egyptian,  261,  301,  559; 
Jewish,  395 ;  Greek,  407 ;  of  the 
Sun,  435;  of  Liber,  496;  Chris- 
tian, 533 

Terebinth-tree,  571 

Terra  sigillata,  130-2,  154,  756 

Tetter,  93 

Textbook,  635 

Text  and  Textual  criticism  and 
history,  magic,  9;  cuneiform,  15, 
17-8;  classics,  21,  27;  Aristotle, 
24,  27;  Pliny,  52;  Ptolemy,  106, 
108;  Galen,  1 19-21;  Hero,  189; 
alchemy,  193 ;  Plutarch,  202 ; 
Aelian,  322;  Philo,  348-9; 
patristic,  374,  377,  389,  401-6, 
477,  495;  Physiologus,  497:91 
Alexander  legend,  chap,  xxiv ; 
Medicine  of  Pliny,  596 ;  Dios- 
corides,  594,  606-13 ;  medicine, 
567,  731;  Isidore,  623;  medieval 
alterations,  3,  338,  683,  720 

Thaphtabaoth,  a  spirit,  369 

Thaumaturgy,   190 

Thautabaoth,  a  spirit,  367 

Theater,  184,  422,  425,  486,  506, 
512 


Thebes  and  Theban,  179,  491,  553, 

765 
Theft,  discovery  of,  and  recovery 

of  object,  644,  666,  681,  718,  725; 

aids,  780 
Theodamas,  294 
Theodoric  the  East  Goth,  569,  617, 

619 
Theodosius  I,  emperor,  584 
Theodosius  II,  emperor,  327 
Theology,  astral,  15,  17,  360-1,  543, 

621;  and  magic,  18,  234;  Galen, 

149;     Egyptian,     370;     attitude 

shown,  619-20 
Therapeutae,  349,  356 
Therapeutics,  10,  122,  141,  735 
Theriac,  130,  733,  756 
Thersites,  269 
Thessaly,  home  of  witches,  58,  203, 

226 
Theurgy,  chap,  xi,  505,  535 
Thomas  the  apostle,  in  India,  475, 

477 
Thoth,  288 
Thotmes     IV,     king     of     Egypt, 

13 
Thought,     history     of,     3-4;     ex~ 

plained  physiologically,  659 
Thread,  89,  590,  656 
Three,  Thrice,  etc.,  69,  79,  82,  88-9, 

91,   93,    169,    174,   295,   476,   479, 

582,    588-9,    592,    614,    656,    721, 

730,  736,  7(17 
Threshold,   69,   89 
Throat,  disease  of,  82 
Thunder,  divination  from,  57,  96, 

262,    546,    562,    629,    635-6,    674, 

679;    other    observance    of,    78; 

thought  to  produce  mushrooms, 

219;  stage,  468 
Thyme,  571 

Tiberius,  emperor,  59,  776 
Tick,  67 

Tide,  254,  274,  351,  517,  530,  703 
Tigellinus,  259,  263,  265 
Tiger,  256,  502 
Tigris-Euphrates,  13-6,  281-2 
Ti'i,  18 
Time,  devices  for  telling,  115,  144, 

187,  276,  2)Zi,  395;  observed  in 

magic,  645 
Titus,  emperor,  42,  45 
Toad,  771 
Tobias  nights,  688 
Toledo,  657 
Tomb,  Egyptian,  9,  14 
Tongue,  98,  150;  use  of,  175,  726, 

779;  gift  of,  208,  386 
Tooth,   68,   82,   84,    159,   279,   599, 


GENERAL  INDEX 


809 


600,  656,  769;  extracting,  filling, 

etc.,  175,  573,  779 
Toothache,  cures  for,  56,  68,  88-90, 
169,  175,  577,  588-9,  592,  599,  614, 

724,  727,  755 
Toothpowder,  236 
Topaz,  495 
Top,  spinning,  487 
Torpedo,  159 
Tortoise,   68,    74,   76,  88,  91,   325, 

626,  764 
Torture,  381,  538 
Touch,  324 

Tower,  of  Babylon,  16 
Trade,  486,  494 ;  and  see  Merchant, 

Business 
Tradition,  see  Authority,  Legend, 

Textual  history 
Trajan,  emperor,  135,  S73 
Transfer,  magic,  see  Disease 
Transformation,  magic,  21,  23,  226, 

250,    280,    390,    393,    399,    415-7, 

424,    446,    470,    509,    561-2,    630, 

773 ;  and  see  Werwolf 
Translation,    Latin,    of    Ptolemy, 

106,    109-10;    Gal?n,    121,     176; 

Hero,  189;  church  fathers,  44S, 

484;     post-classical     and     early 

medieval,    570,    576,    619,    chap. 

xxiv;     from    the    Arabic,    611, 

690-1,  chaps,  xxviii,  xxx,  xxxii; 

pretended,     292;     Anglo-Saxon, 

638;  other  vernacular,  498,  612, 

677,  778;   Greek,  331,  342,  637; 

magic,    430;    Arabic,    106,     189, 

292,  498,  554,  607,  652-3 
Travel,  575,  668,  743 
Tree,  255;  of  knowledge,  367,  474; 

of  life,  350;  sun  and  moon,  474 
Trial,      for     heresy      or      magic, 

Apuleius,     222,     232-40;     Apol- 

lonius,     249 ;     Priscillian,     381 ; 

Basilius,  639 
Triangle,  206,  356 
Trigona,  Trigones,  or  Triplicitates, 

114,  184 
Trigonometry,  107 
Trinity,  479,  541,  619-20 
Triptolemus,  546 
Trivia,  236 

Trojan  war,  260,  271,  294,  363 
Trophonius,  cave  of,  204,  206,  248, 

282 
Truth,    devotion    to,    400;    Galen, 

1 18-9,    123,    127;    Plotinus,    300; 

Plain    of,    211;    Simon's    Helen 

and,  364-5 
Tube,  hidden,  469 
Tubingen  theory,  423 


Tumor,  71,  82,  93,  571,  587,  590, 

599 
Tunis,  744 
Tunny  fish,  218 
Turpentine,  132 
Tuscan,  598 
Tutia,  132 

Twelve,  14,  383,  385,  411,  495 
Twins,  81 ;  argument  from,  against 

astrology,  273,  275,  514 
Typhon,  463,  558 
Tyriac,  see  Theriac 

Ulcer,  580,  779 

Underground,  magic  learned,  280; 

and  see  Burial 
Underwear,  386,  581 
Underworld,  16,  251,  282,  383,  470 
Unguent,  55,  128-30,  133,  142,  169, 

229,  367,  420,  739,  755 
Unicorn,  255,  636 
Universals  and  particulars,  622 
Universe,   theories   of,    180-1,   193, 

210,    254,    312,    361-4,   371,   397; 

duration  of,  374-6,  541 ;  spheric- 
ity of,  408 
Urine,  use  of,  81-3,  325,  573,  581, 

640,   684,    72,7,    7A(>,    763,   766-9; 

emission  of,  69,  739,  756 
Ursa  Major,  355 
Utensils,  624 

Vacuum,   189,  669 

Valentinus   the   Gnostic,  364,  374, 

411,  488 
Valve,  192;  in  brain,  659 
Vampire,  see  Empousa,  Lamia 
Vapor,    141 
Vaporization,  724 
Vascular  system,  30 
Vases,  Greek,  266,  770 
Vein,  147,  576,  728 
Venesection,  see  Bleeding 
Ventriloquism,  352,  448,  470,  560; 

and  see  Endor,  witch  of 
Venus,  goddess,  236 ;  planet,  96-7 
Verbena,  an  herb,  66,  y6,  614,  725 
Vernacular  literature,  3;   and  see 

Translation 
Verus,  L.,  emperor,  124 
Vervain,  see  Verbena 
Vespasian,  emperor,  253 
Vesuvius,  Mt.,  45 
Veterinary,  593,  722,  724,  730 
Vinegar,  57,  71,  169,  175,  768 
Vineyard,  604 
Violet,  751 
Viper,  use  of,  91,  142,  159,  170,  173, 

2x8,     294,    331,     572,     and     see 


8io 


GENERAL  INDEX 


Theriac;  remedy  against,  213, 
490,  721 ;  mode  of  generation, 
172,  238,  255,  277,  322,,  409,  491 

Virgin  and  Virginity,  55,  83,  90, 
93,  2j6,  279,  326,  431,  491,  639, 
763 ;  and  see  Chastity,  and  Mary, 
Virgin 

Virtue,  see  Occult 

Virtues,  three,  479 ;  four,  675 

Vision,  theory  of,  659,  669 

Vitriol,  764 

Vivisection,  147 

Voice,  134,  146,  180,  184 

Volcano,  254 

Vowels,  92,  356,  371,  379 

Vulture,  89,  22Z,  580,  724,  726,  729 

Wall,  of  house,  69 

Wand,  magic,  20,  252,  508,  560 

War  and  Warfare,  187,  358;  de- 
cried, 6,  46-7,   122 

Warts,  to  get  rid  of,  71,  88,  166, 
589,.  72,7 

Washing,  ceremonial,  295,  730 

Wasp,  332 

Water,  and  Waters,  142,  272),  4o8> 
490;  above  the  firmament,  181, 
346,  458,  487,  632 ;  drinking,  685 ; 
dissolves  magic,  227,  722;  in 
which  feet  washed,  175 ;  marvel- 
ous, medical,  and  chemical,  102, 
183,  197,  329,  763;  -jar  and 
-works,  187,  191-2;  clock,  see 
Time ;  underground,  55 ;  and  see 
Fountain,  Holy,  Stream,  Sea, 
etc. 

Wave  theory,  see  Sound 

Wax,  71,  229,  467-8,  571,  738;  and 
see  Image 

Weasel,  80,  231,  331,  396,  409,  460, 
636 ;    and    see    Rue,    tasted    by 

Weather,  observed,  178;  pre- 
dicted, 97,  IIS,  181,  185,  231,  325, 
463,  605,  642,  647 ;  and  see  Rain- 
making,  Storm-averting  magic 

Well,  55,  251,  271 

Werwolf,  23,  51,  339 

Whale,  49 

Wheat,  373,  598 

Wheel,  192,  382;  magic  or  solar, 
266;  of  fortune,  683 


Whetstone,  71 

White,  78-9,  215,  295,  755 

Widow,  71 

Will,  free,  relation  to  fate  and  the 
stars,  210,  275-6,  306,  315,  374-5, 
412,  456,  475,  513,  518,  531,  620-2 

William  Rufus,  king  of  England, 
673 

Wind,  16,  78,  373,  676,  678,  728 

Wine,  55,  68-9,  132,  137,  142,  231, 
263,  295,  572,  581,  605-6,  721,  739, 
765 ;  and  see  Falernian 

Witch,  Witchcraft,  and  Wizard,  2, 
18-9,  164,  172,  203,  225-31,  251, 
344,  373,.  407,  535,,  599,  722;  and 
see  Goetia,  Old-wives,  Sorcery 

Wolf,  80,  93,  172,  219,  332,  587-8, 
656,  726;  and  see  Werwolf 

Woman,  396,  588,  710,  740-1 ;  dis- 
eases of,  82,  142,  289,  536,  746 

Wood,  233 

Woodpecker,  23,  78 

Wool,  89,  173,  590,  656 

Words,  power  of,  10,  24,  152,  207, 
231,  239,  279,  299,  311,  370,  378, 
384,  414,  422-31,  438,  445,  449-52, 
476,  507,  561-2,  605,  627,  644, 
666 ;  and  see  Incantation 

World-soul,  96,  150,  210,  254,  299, 
303,  349,  358,  410,  544,  622 

Worm,  89,  94,  582,  729,  754,  768; 
and  see  Earthworm,  Tape-worm 

Wormwood,  722 

Writing,  a  sin,  344;  invisible,  265 

Wryneck,  265-7 

Yahweh,  446 
Year  1000  A.D.,  675 
Yew,  81 
York,  689 

Youth,  renewed  or  perpetual,  see 
Elixir,  Fountain,  Longevity 

Zeus,  23,  193,  284,  380 

Zodiac,  14,  16,  96,  98,  114,  179,  184, 
283,  354,  378,  492,  520,  679,  711, 
728;  and  parts  of  human  body, 
662,  673-4,  777 

Zoology,  237,  503;  and  see  Animal 

Zone,  376 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


Names  of  authors,  editors,  translators,  publishers,  etc.,  in  Roman 
type.  Titles  and  periodicals  in  italics.  Leading  passages  in  italics. 
Bibliographical  abbreviations,  such  as  EB,  HL,  PG,  PL,  are  as  a  rule 
not  indexed.  In  the  abbreviated  titles  such  opening  vi^ords  as  De  and 
Liber  are  omitted  to  facilitate  aphabetical  arrangement.  In  proper 
names  De  and  Von  are  usually  designated  by  d.  and  v.,  and  are  treated 
as  initials. 


Abammon,  307 

Abano,    Peter    of,    162,    179,   409, 

600,  610,  651,  66s,  710,  714 
Abdallah,  693 
Abdias,  425-6 
Abel,  A.,  434 
Abel,  E.,  291,  293,  463 
Abelard,  Peter,  475,  544 
Abgarus,  395 
Abhandlung  en     d.     bayr.     Akad., 

567-8 
Abhandlung  en    d.    Berlin    Akad., 

121,  468,  732 
Abhandlungen  z.  Gesch,  d.  Math. 

Wiss.,  642 
Abraham    the    patriarch,    reputed 

book  of,  445 
Abraham,  cited  by  Firmicus,  537 
Abraham  of  Tortosa,  611 
Abt,    Apologie    d.    Apuleius,    22, 

239 
Abu  Jafar  Ahmed   Ibn-al-Jezzar, 

745 
Abu  Sa'id  Schadsan,  651 
Accad.  dei  Lincei,  Rendiconti  dell', 

499 
Accad.  di  Monaco,  Atti  dell',  551 
Acta  Sanctorum,  296 
Acts  of  the  Apostles,  136,  510 
Acts  (Apocryphal) 

of  Archelaus,  398 

of  Barnabas,  397 

of  John,  397 

of  Nereus  and  Achilles,  425 

of  Paul,  396 

of  Paul  and  Thecla,  395 

of  Peter,  405 

of  Peter  and  Andrezv,  396 

of  Peter  and  Paul,  397,  424 

of  Philip,  397 

of  Pilate,  390,  395 

of  Thomas,  374,  397 
Adalmus,  673 
Adam,  Moon-Book,  682 


Adam  of  Bremen,  yy^i 

Adam  of  St.  Victor,  398 

Adams,  F.,  568 

Ad-Damiri,  393,  688 

Adelard    of    Bath,    100,    468,   652, 

664,  706,  773 
Adelbold,  706-7 
Ademarus  Cabannensis,  704 
Adhelmus,  see  Aldhelm 
Aelfric,  484,  677 
Aelian,  238,  300,  322-6,  331 
Aemilius  Macer,  612 
Aeschrion,  178 
Aeschylus,  325 

Aesculapius,  537,  597-8,  600,  735 
Aesop,  553 
Aethicus,  see  Ethicus 
Aetius    of    Amida,    163,    170,   292, 

chap.  XXV 
Agathodaemon,  195 
Agathias,  575 
Aggregator,  611 
Agricola,  De  re  metal.,  132,  329 
Agrippa,  H.  C,  Occult  Philosophyi 

454.  653 
Ahrens,  K.,  497,  499,  503 
Ajasson,  42 

Alandraeus,  see  Alchandrus 
Albaihaqi,  670 
Albandinus,  716 
Alberic  the   Deacon,  752 
Albertus    Magnus,    158,    163,    326, 
600,  658,  725,  772 

Animal.,  503,  563,  746 

Causis  et  propriet.,  563 

Mineral.,  501,  653 

Somno  ct  zngilia,  359 

Speculum  astronomiae,  64,7,  650, 
664 

Veget.  et  plantis,  653 
Albucasis,  742 
Albumasar,  524,  647,  649-52,  691 

Conjunctions,  649-51 

Experiments,  649 


811 


8l2 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


Flores,  649-50 

Greater  Introduction,  649 

Lesser  Introduction,  652 

Mysteries,  651 

Rains,  651-2 

Revolutions,  651 

Sadan,  651 

Searching  of  the  Heart,  649 
Alchadrinus  or  Alchandrinus,  see 

Alchandrus 
Alchandrus,  710-19 

Breviary,  7i4ff. 

Mathematica,  7ioff. 
Alchamia,  774 
Alchimus,  601 

Alcibiades,  see  Helxai,  Book  of 
Alcuin,  556,  617,  658 
Aldhelm,  636 
Aldus,  see  Medici  antiqui 
Alexander  the  Great,  331,  578 

astrological  treatises,  7i2ff. 

Mirabilibus  Indiae,  555-6,  564 

Responsio  ad  Dindimum,  556 
Alexander  of  Aphrodisias,  578 
Alexander  Polyhistor,  341 
Alexander  of  Tralles,  chap,  xxv, 

137-8,  174,  596,  721,  747  . 
Alexandre,       Oracula      Sibylhna, 

287 
Alexis,  Mandragorisomene,  22 
Alfanus,  752-3 
Al-Farabi,  744 
Alfraganus,  72>7 
Alfred  the  Great,  king,  6^7 
Algazel,  744 
Alhahib,  Book  of,  763 
Alhandreus,  see  Alchandrus 
Ali  ibn  Abbas,  Khitaab  el  Maleki, 

747 
Alkindi,  chap  xxviii 

Deceits  of  Alchemists,  649 

Empire  of  Arabs,  648 

Judgments,  648 

Geomancy,  648 

Pluviis,  647-8 

Properties  of  Swords,  649 

Somno  et  visione,  646 

Spectaculis,  642 

Stellar  Rays,  643-6 
Allard,  P.,  298 
Alma,  J.  d',  349 
Alphita,  600 
Altc  Orient,  7,  33-5 
Amatus  of  Salerno,  752 
Ambrose,  426,  447,  494,  499,   505, 
686 

Hexaemeron,  482-3,  485 

Moribus  Brachmannorum,  557 
Amelineau,  360,  377 


American    Historical    Association 

Papers,  632 
American  Journal  of  Archaeology, 

American  Mathematical  Monthly, 

American  Society  of  Church  His- 
tory Papers,  406 
Amigeron,  see  Damigeron 
Ammianus    Marcellinus,   285,   288, 

318-9,  527 
Amplonius,    Catalogue    of    MSS, 

267 
Anastasius  Antiochenus,  469 
Anaxagoras,  456 
Anaxandrides,  22 
Anaxilas,  22 
Anaxilaus,  88,  214 
Anaximenes,  181 
Andreas,  154 
Andrian,  F.  v.,  16 
Andromachus,  171 
Angelus,  J.,  106,  525 
Annates  de  la  Faculte  des  Lettres 

de  Bordeaux,  704 
Annates  du  Service  des  Antiquites 

de  I'Egypte,  14 
Annee  Sociologique,  6 
Ansileubus,  503 
Ante-Nicene     Fathers,     387,     and 

Book  II  passim 
Anthropologic,  L',  6 
Antipater,  185 
Antisthenes,  553 
Antonius  Eparchus,  745 
Antonius  Musus,  600 
Anz,  Gnostizismus,  360,  383 
Aomar,  647 
Aphaxad,  435 
Apion,  405 

Apocrypha,  chap,  xvi,  342,  406 
Apollonius,    to    whom    works    of 

magic  are  ascribed,  267 
Apollonius  of  Perga,  663 
Apollonius  of  Tyana,  Epistles  and 

Will,    244;    and    see    other 

index 
Apollonius  and  Galen,  723 
Apostles,  see  Acts,  Constitutiones, 

D  { das  c  alia 
Apuleius   of    Madaura,    chap,   vii, 

165,  242,  290,  309,  390,  465, 

508 
Apology,  222-5,  232-41,  463 
Dogma  of  Plato,  222,  241,  596 
Florida,  222,   233 
God  of  Socrates,  222,  240-1 
Golden  Ass  or  Metamorphoses, 

222-32,  241,  332,  406,  509 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


813 


Natural  Questions,  237 

Universe,  222 
dubious  or  spurious 

Asclepius,     see    Hermes     Tris- 
megistus 

grammatical  and  rhetorical,  596 

Herbarium,  chap,  xxzn,  696 

Sphere,  chap,  xxix,  igj,  596 
Aquinas,  Thomas,  519,  544,  658 
Aratus,  709 
Arcandam,  716 
Archaeologia,  chap,  xxxiii 
Archandrinus,  see  Alchandrus 
Archigenes,  137,  152,  168,  176 
Archimatthaeus,  738 
Archimedes,  29,  663 

Catoptrica,  237 
Archinapolus,  185 
Archiv  f.  Gesch  d.  Medisin,  188, 

72,7 
Archiv     f.        Kunde     dsterreich. 

Geschichtsquellen,  498 
Archiv     f.     Studium     d.     Neuer. 

Sprachen,  67^ 
Arendzen,  J.  P.,  360,  371 
Aretaeus,  570 
Aretinus  Quilichinus,  558 
Arevalus,  402,  623 
Arfarfan    or    Argafalan    or    Ar- 

gafalaus,  711 
Aristarchus,  31,  219 
Aristodemus,  574 
Aristophanes,  24 
Birds,  324 
Goetes,  22 
Aristotle,  3,  26,  32,  103,  139,   146, 

153,    180,    205,    210,    237-8, 

317,  408,  451,  553,  563.  565, 

619-20,  632,  642,  657,  663-5, 

764 
Animals,  History  of,  24-30,   50, 

129,  240,  255,  331,  486,  491, 

503.. 
Categoriis,  677 
Generatione,  30 
Interprctatione,  677 
Metaphysics,  621 
Meteorology,  486 
Partibus,  30 
Physics,  622 
Politics,  97 

dubious  or  spurious 
Images,  666 

Lapidary,  654,  656,  671,  756 
Secret  of  Secrets,  555 
Arnald  of  Villanova,  162,  653,  688, 

736-7,  741 
Arnheim,  316 
Arnobius,  423,  505 


Arnold  of  Saxony,  6ri 

Arrian,  553 

Artemidorus,  201 

Artephius  or  Artesius,  774 

Asakki  marsuti,  18 

Ascalu  the  Ishmaelite,  711 

Ascension  of  Isaiah,  399 

Asclepiades,  141,  168 

Asclepius,  see  Hermes  Trismegis- 
tus 

Ashmole,  E.,  Theatrum  chemicum 
Britannicum,  773 

Astrolabe,  anonymous  treatises  on, 
chap.  XXX 

Athenaeus,  120,  196,  202 

Athenagoras,  288 

Aubert  u.  Wimmer,  73 

Audollent,  28 

Aufidius  Bassus,  45 

Augustine,   chap,  xxii,  241-2,  288, 
303,  447,  476,  48s,  617,  626, 
628,658,  660,  686,692 
Anima,  147 
Cataclysmo,  507 
City  of  God  (Civitate  Dei)  320, 

326,  chap,  xxii,  535,  552-4 
Confessions,  459,  504-5,  509,  511 
Consensu  Evangelist  arum,  505 
Contra  Academic os,  518 
Contra  Faustutn,  518 
Contra  Priscillianistas,  519 
Diversis  quaestionibus,  508,  510, 

Divinatione  daemonum,  508 
Doctrina  Christiana,  508,  521 
Enchiridion,  519 
Epistolae,  241,  514 
Genesi  ad    litteram,   483,    504-5, 
509,    511,    514,    518-9,    521-2 
660-1 
Haer.,  369 

Octo  Dulcitii  quaest.,  510 
Quacstiones  ex  Novo  Test.,  518 
Sermones,  426,  507,  514,  518 
Sermones  supposititi,  522 
Trinitate,  506-9 
Aulus    Gellius,    50,    59,    202,    269, 

354 
Auracher,  T.  M.,  and  Stadler,  H., 

610 
Ausfeld,  A.,  551 
Ausfeld  and  Kroll,  551 
Avezac,  d',  601 
Avicenna,   658,   660 

Anima,  766 

Divus.  philos.,  744 
Axt  and  Riegler,  293 

Babelon,  E.,  341 


8i4 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


Babut,  E.  C,  381 

Bacon,  Roger,   108,   163,  341,  409, 

601,  603,  646,  661,  665,  766 
Baethgen,  y2> 
Bald  and  Cild,  720-2,  t^Z 
Barach,  S.,  658 
Bardaisan    or    Bardesanes,    373-7, 

381,  412,  457,  471,  475,  782 
Barlama,  138 
Barnabas,  404,  408 
Epistle,   396,    409;    and    see   Acts 

(Apocryphal) 
Barnes,   C.  L.,  yy^ 
Bartholomew     of     England,     De 

proprietatibus    rerum,     170, 

484,  501,  503,  578,  611,  660, 

686 
Baruch,  Book  of,  399 
Basil,  Hexaemeron,  chap,  xxi,  322, 

458,  476,  504,  552-4 
Basil     and     Gregory,     PMlocalia, 

405-6 
Basset,  R.,  398-9 
Bate,  Henri,  650 
Bateson,  M.,  689-90 
Bath  Occult  Reprint  Series,  291 
Battle,  W.  C,  28 
Baudry  de  Balzac,  736 
Baur,  L.,  744 
Beazley,  R.,  326,  480,  601 
Becker,  H.,  551 
Beckh,  H.,  604 
Beckmann,  Marbod,  775 
Bede,    476,    617,    634-6,   658,    675, 

683,  688,  694,  702 
Hexaemeron,  485 
Natura  rerum,  634-5,  676,  695 
Samuel,  635 
Temporibus,  634-5 
Tonitruis,  635-6,  679 
Belenus,  267 
Bellarminus,  469 
Belon,  P.,  131 
Bennett,  W.   H.,  446 
Bentwichj  N.,  349 
Berengarius,  701-2 
Bernadakes,  G.  N.,  202 
Bernard    of    Clairvaux,    St.    502, 

658 
Bernard  Gordon,  see  Gordon 
Bernard  of  Provence,  740 
Bernard  Silvester,  717 
Bernays,  73 
Berosus,  95,   104,   185 
Berthelot,  P.  E.  M.,  540 
Archeologie  (1906),  12 
Chinvie   (1893),  670,  697,  761 
Introduction     (1889),     12,     199, 

544 


Origines    (1885),    12-3,   59,    193, 

292,  369,  544,  559 
Voyages  (1895),  131 
Berthelot  et  Ruelle  (1887-8),  193, 

_  320,  683 
Bestiary,  498 
Bevan,  A.  A.,  374 
Bezogar,  682 
Bezold,  16 
Bezold,  C.,  34 
Bible,   16,   138,  246,  342,  350,  352, 

361-2,  385-6,  405,  439,  chap. 

xxi,  511,  546,  583,  681,  729; 

and  see  names  of  individual 

books  of 
Bibliotheca  Mathematica,  188,  193 
Bibliotheca  Patrum,  426 
Bibl.  d.  l'£cole  des  Hautes  Etudes, 

381,  76s 
Bikelas,  73 
Billerbeck,  73 
Bisse,  E.,  557 
Bivilaqua,  525 
Bjornbo  and  Vogl,  642,  663 
Bl.  f.  bayr.  Gymn.,  73 
Boethius,     109,    527,    618-22,    658, 

677 
Boissier,  A.,  34 
Boll,  F.,  14,  16,  105,  III,  291,  316, 

524-5,  683 
Bollettino  delta  Societd  geografica 

italiana,  480 
Bolus  de  Mendes,  50 
Boncompagni,   B.,   Gherardo   Cre- 

monese,  163 
Bonnet,  Acta  apostolorum  apocry- 
pha, 397 
Book  of  Changes,  6 
Book  of  the  Dead,  9,  362 
Book  of  the  Saviour,  369,  377 
Book  of  Secrets,  670 
Book  of  Seventy,  670 

for   Book   of,   see   also  Al- 

habib,        Baruch,        Crates, 

Enoch,  Helxai,  Jeu 
Borgnet,  A.,  664 
Bostock,  J.,  and  Riley,  H.  T.,  chap. 

ii,  175,  214,  329 
Bouche-Leclercq,   A.,   50,   59,    112, 

292-3,    297,    308,    316,    476, 

683,  687 
Bouchier,  E.  S.,  313,  380,  434 
Bousset,  W.,  349,  361 
Box,  E.  B.,  619 
Box,  G.  H.,  351 
Brandt,  W.,  383 
Braulio,  623-4,  628 
Breasted,   J.   H.,    12 
History  of  Egypt,  8-1? 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


815 


Religion       and       Thought       in 

Ancient  Egypt,  7-10 
Brehaut,  E.,  623,  625 
Brehier,  E.,  348-9 
Breslait  Philol.  Abhandl.,  297 
Briau,  R.  M.,  125 
Bridges,  R.  H.,  603,  661 
British     Museum     Catalogue     of 

Vases,  266 
Brock,  A.  J.,  119,  122 
Brougniart,  A.,  761 
Brown,  J.  Wood,  670 
Browne,  C.  A.,  194 
Browne,  E.  G.,  660,  674 
Browne,  Thomas,  354 
Bubnov,  t;oi,  chap,  xxx 
Budge,  E.  A.  W. 
Alexander,  551,  562-3 
Egyptian  Magic,  7-14,  233,  686 
Bulletin  Hispanique,  704 
Bulletin    et    Mem.    d.    I.    Socicte 

Archeol.    d.   dept.   d'llle-et- 

Vilaine,  775 
Bulletin  d.   I.  Societe  d.   Geogra- 

phie,  565 
Bunbury,     History      of     Ancient 

Geography,  601 
Burchard  of  Worms,  630 
Burckhardt,  J.,  690 
Burkett,  F.  C,  374 
Burnam,  J.  M.,  704 
Burr,  G.  L.,  2,  630 
Burton,  W.,  762 
Bury,  J.  B.,  266-7,  388 
Busson,  G.,  7 
Butler,  H.  E.,  and  Owen,  A.   S., 

Apulei  Apologia,   22,   224ff. 
Buttmann,  P.,  340 
Byzant.  Zeitschrift,  497 

Caecilius,  94 

Caelius  Aurelianus,  625 

Caesar,  J.,  see  Weber,  C.  F.,  and 

Cahier,  Nouveaux  Melanges,  498 

Cahier  et  Martin,  Melanges,  498 

Cajori,  188 

Calderon,  432 

Callisthenes  (on  roots),  495 

Callisthenes   Pseudo-,   chap,  xxiv, 

,  7,  331 
Calvin,  447 

Cambridge  Medieval  History,  524 
Cambridge   University   Texts  and 

Studies,  342 
Camerarius,  J.,  556 
Campbell,  C,  8 

Capart,  Primitive  Art  in  Egypt,  6 
Capella,  see  Martianus 
Caraccio,  349 


Cardan,  769 

Carra  de  Vaux,  188,  653,  661 

Carrarioli,  D.,  551 

Casaubon,  213 

Cassianus  Bassus,  604 

Cassiodorus,  545,  617,  619,  625 

Institutes,  483,  608 

Letters,  639 
Cassius  Felix,  607 
Catalogus  codicum  Graecorum  as- 
trologorum,   28,    116,   291, 

651 

Cato,  De  re  rustica,  93 

Cecco  d'Ascoli,  267,  665 

Celsus,  282 
Against  magicians,  278 
True  Discourse,  chap,  xix 

Celsus  the  medical  writer,  727 

Censorinus,  354,  371,  690 

Chaeremon,  315,  457 

Chalcidius,  476 

Chapman,  405 

Charles,  R.  H.,  chap,  xiii,  488-9 
Apocrypha  and  Pseudepigrapha, 

287,  chap,  xiii 
Ascension  of  Isaiah,  399 
Book  of  Enoch,  chap,  xiii 

Charles  and  Forbes,  chap,  xiii 

Charles  and  Morfill,  chap,  xiii 

Charterius,  R.,  119 

Chavannes,  E.,  et  Pelliot,  P.,  383 

Chiron  the  centaur,  434,  597-8 

Choulant,  L.,  578,  612-3 

Christ,  Gesch.  d.  Griech.  Litt.,  105, 
201,  215,  540 

Christliches  Kunstblatt,  497 

Chrysippus,  50,  146 

Chrysostom,  John,  472-6,  480,  494, 

499 

Naturis  bestiarum,  499 

Sixth  Homily  on  Matthew,  472-4 

Spurious  Homily   on  Matthew, 
472-5 
Chwolson,  D.  A.,  661-3 
Cicero,  50,  232,  597 

Divinatione,  97,  268-73 

Dream  of  Scipio,  273,  544 

Republic,  274 
Cild,  see  Bald  and 
Cillie,  G.  G.,  555 
Oark  and  Geikie,  loi 
Classical  Philology,  530 
Classical  Review,  21,  525 
Clement  Pseudo,  363-4,  chap,  xvii 

Circuits,  404 

Homilies,  364-5,  chap,  xvii 

Itincrarium,  402 

Recognitions,   231,   364-5,    chap. 


8i6 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


Clement  of  Alexandria,  Stromata, 

288,  476,  499 
Cleopatra,  152,  196,  655 
Clerval,     Hermann     le     Dalmate, 

701-2 
Clinton,  Fasti,  124,  135 
Clitomachus,  268 

Cockayne,  O.,  Leechdoms,  596,  679, 
72off.,  734,  776 
Narratiunculae,  556 
Cohn,  L.,  348,  351 
Collenucius,  P.,  53 
Colombo,  De  re  anatomica,  147 
'Columbia    University    Studies    in 

History,  etc.,  622 
Columella,  50,  59 
Colville,  G.,  619 
Combarieu,  J.,  6,  568 
Compositiones  ad  tingenda,  chap. 

xxxiii 
Compotus  or  Computus,  676-7 
Comte,  107 
Confucian  Canon,  6 
Congrcs   scientiiique   international 

des  catholiques,  7,  297,  701 
Congress,  International,  of  Medi- 
cine, 131,  145,  640,  667,  672,^ 
Congress,   International,    of    Ori- 
entalists, 380 
Constantinus      Africanus,      chap, 
xxxii,^  577,  610,  653,  657,  7Z'i- 
Antidotarium,  747 
Aureus,  757-9 
Chirurgia,  747-8 
Coitu,  742,  753 
Compendium  megategni,  749 
Experimentis,  753 
Febrium,  742,  750 
Graduum,  613,  748,  7So-i,  755-6 
Humana  natura,  659-60,  757 
Melancholia,   658-9,    742,    751-2, 

755 
Oblivione,  742 
Pantegni,  658-9,  746fif. 
Simplicis  medicinae,  748 
Stomacho,  742,  752-3 
Tegni,    Megategni,    Microtegni, 

749 
Urinis,  750 
Viaticum,   742,   745,   749ff-,   753, 

756 
Constitutiones  apostolorum,  422 
Conybeare,  F.  C,  247,  348-9 
Cook,   A.   B.,   Zeus,  23,  296,  379, 

429 
Cook,  A.  S.,  499 

Cordier,  H.,  see  Yule,  Marco  Polo 
Cordo,  see  Simon  of  Genoa 
Cornarius,  I.,  566ff. 


Cornford,  F.  M.,  23 

Corpus    Medicorum     Graecorum, 

119 
Cory,  Ancient  Fragments,  297 
Cory,  A.  T.,  Horapollo,  331 
Cosmas  Indicopleustes,  480 
Costa  ben  Luca,  652-9 
Differentia   spiritus    et    animae, 

657-9 
Hero's  Mechanics,  189,  652 
Physical  Ligatures,  652-7 
Cousin,  v.,  Prodi  Opera,  319 
Coxe,    H.    O.,    52,    121,    478,   701, 

715 
Craig,  J.  A.,  33-4 
Crates,  Book  of,  763 
Crateuas,  606 
Crawford,  W.  S.,  540 
Creuzer,  F.,  299 
Crinas  of  Marseilles,  98 
Crito,    152 
Critodemus,  95 
Croiset,  282 
Crophill,  John,  684-5 
Cruice,  Abbe,  466 
Cumont,  F. 

Babylon   u.    d.    Griech.   Astrol- 
_  ogie,  34  . 

Oriental  Religions,  21,  296,  533 
Cunningham,  W.,  495 
Cunningham    Memoirs    of   Royal 

Irish  Academy,  293 
Curtiss,  S.  I.,  33 
Curtze,  706 
Cushman,  H.  E.,  26 
Cyprian,  of  Antioch 

Confessio,  296,  chap,  xviii 

Martyrium,  428 
Cyprian  of  Carthage,  463,  465 
Cyril,  398,  476 
Cyril  of  Alexandria,  570 
Cyril  of  Jerusalem,  423 

Dalechamps,  329 

Dalton,  O.  M.,  237,  498,  607 

Damigeron,  293,  558,  605,  777 

Damis  of  Nineveh,  chap,  viii,  407 

Damocrates,  135 

Daniel  the  prophet,  385,  679-80 

Daniel  of  Morley,  744 

Dante,  Conznzno,  619 
Divine  Comedy,  340,  361 

Daremberg,  C.  V.,  600,  731,  736 
Galien  comme  philosophe,  124 
Galien  sur  Vanato^nie,  122,   141, 

^45 
Hist.     d.     Sciences     Medicates, 

570-1,  577,  743ff. 
Notices  et  Ex  traits,  598,  742ff. 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


817 


Daremberg  et  Saglio,  22,  27,  164, 

265 
Daressy,  G.,  14 
d'Avezac,   see   Avezac 
De  aluminibus  et  salibus,  670 
De  anima,  766 
De  la  Ville  de  Mirmont,  673 
De  Morgan,  108 
De  Renzi,  see  Renzi 
De  spiritu  et  anima,  658 
De  vetula,  691 
Delambre,  J.  B.  J.,  108,  663 
Delisle,  L.,  698 
Democritus,  50,  58-9,  61-6,  80,  84, 

91,  97,   140,   196-8,  205,  329, 

582,  605,  629,  682-3,  733 
Denkschr.  d.  Akad.  Wien,  73 
Detlefsen,  D.,  42,  52 
Deuteronomy,  453,  456 
Deventer,  316 
Dhorme,  P.,  33 
Dicaearchus,  180,  213 
Diet.  Chris.  Biog.,  362-3 
Diet.  National  Biog.,  291,  etc. 
Dicuil,  326 

Didascalia  Apostolorum,  422 
Didot,  106,  180 

Didymus  of  Alexandria,  463,  604 
Diels,  H.,  119,  121,  468 
Dierich,  381 
Dieterich,  A.,  288 
Dieterici,  F.,  642 
Digest,  see  Justinian 
Dillmann,  399 
Dindimus,  341,  556 
Dindorf,  282,  415,  etc. 
Dio  Cassius,  201,  259 
Dio  Chrysostom,  425 
Diocles  Carystius,  178 
Diodorus  of  Tarsus,  476 
Diogenes  Laertius,  22,  97,  196 
Diogenes  the  Stoic,  273 
Dionysius  the  Areopagite,  546-7 
Dionysius  Exiguus,  484 
Dioscorides,  131,  154,  199,  495,  571, 

597,    605-11,    613,    625,    755, 

761,  764 
Dioscorides-Pseudo,  239 
Herbis  femininis,  609 
Lapidibus,  611,  654 
Dittmeyer,  27 
Dollinger,  I.  I.,  705 
Domitius  Piso,  44 
Donatus,  St.,  684 
Dorotheus,  648 
Doutte,  E.,  5 
Druon,  H.,  540 
Dryoff,  A.,  73 
Diibner,  Fr.,  552 


Duhem,    P.,    Systeme  du  Monde, 

106,  456-9,  481,  504 
Duncker,  466 
Dunstan,  773 
Duruy,  135 

Ebers,  G.,  10 

Ebrubat  Zafar  filie  Elbazar,  745 

Ecclesiasticus,  510 

Ediing,  381 

Egidius  de  Tebaldis,  no 

Egyptian  Days,  chap,  xxix,  app.  li 

Elisinus,  267 

Elkman,  V.  W.,  491 

Elliot  Smith,  12 

Empedocles,   23,   58,   61,    153,  204, 

234,  247 
Encyclopedia  Britannica,  301,  etc. 
Encyclopedia     of     Religion     and 

Ethics,  22,  383,  etc. 
Endres,  J.  A.,  753 
Engelbert  of  Liege,  673 
Engelbrecht,  116,  538 
Enoch 

Book  of,  chap,  xiii,  208,  350,  399, 
410,  454,  457-8,  463 

Fifteen      Stars,      Herbs,      and 
Stones,  664 

Secrets  of,  chap,  xiii 
Ephemeris  f.  semit.  Epig.,  389 
Ephodia,  745,  749 
Ephraem  Syrus,  374,  381 
Epicharmus,  86 
Epicurus,  140-1,  151,  169,  180,  270, 

Epigenes,  95 

Epimenides,  234 

Epiphanius,   405-6,    476,    488,   499, 
503 
Contra  haereses,  369,  458 
Duodecim  gemmis,  495-6 
Epist.     ad     Joan.     J  crosolymit., 

458-9 
Panarton,   363-4,    369,   415,   434, 

494-5 
Ponderibus  et  mensuris,  627 
Epping,  J.,  and  Strassmeier,  J.  N., 

34 
Eratosthenes,  709 
Erhard,  Fauna  d.  Cykladen,  73 
Erkenhard,  677 
Erlangcr  Beitrdge  z.  engl.  Philol., 

733 
Erman,  A.,  7 
Ernault,  L.  V.  E.,  775 
Errors  condemned  at  Oxford  and 

Paris,  642-3 
Esdras,  Suppiitatio,  677,  682 
Ethe,  551 


8i8 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


Ethelwold,  705 

Ethicus,  Cosmo  graphic,  600-604 
fitienne,  R.,  see  Stephanus 
Euclid,  29,  139,  663 

Geometry,  705-6 

Optics,  669 
Eudemus,  237 
Eudoxus,  61 
Eugene  of  Palermo,  108 
Eugenius  Toletanus,  696 
Eunapius,  297 
Euripides,  22 
Eusebius,  261,  374,. 395,  405,  466 

Against  Apollonius,  246 

Praep.  Evang.,  297,  317,  320,  341, 

354,  457 
Ejustache  of  Kent,  564 
Eustathius  Afer,  484-5 
Eustathius  of  Antioch,  470 
Evans,  A.  J.,  301 
Evans,  E.  P.,  497 
Evax,  463,  chap,  xxxiv 
Everard,  John,  291 
Evi^ald,  341 
Exodus,  386 
Eyssenhardt,  F.,  545 

Fabricius,  J.  A. 

Bibl.  Graec,  599,  743 

Cod.  apocr.,  387,  425-6 

Sextus  Empiricus,  269 
Farnell,   Greece  and  Babylon,   15, 

17-8,  23-4 
Fasti  Philocaliani,  686 
Favorinus,  269,  274-5 
Favre,  G.,  551 
Fell,  John,  428 
Ferrarius,  747 
Ferry,  C,  775 
Fialon,  484 

Ficinus,  Marsilius,  319 
Finlayson,  J.,  119,  138-9,  143 
Firmicus    Maternus,    Julius,    116, 
125,    525-3S.   689,   698,    70s, 
710,  782 

Errore,  525-9 

Mathesis,  525-38 
Fischer,  A.,  673 
Flaccus  Africanus,  267 
Florentinus,  425 
Fiorilegia,  618 
Fliigel,  G.,  640 
Fogginius,  495 
Folcz,  John,  612 
Folk-lore,  24 
Forbes,  see  Charles  and 
Forster,  M.,  673 
Fossey,  15,  17-20.  33 
Fossi,  F.,  53 


Fowler,  H.  W.,  and  F.  G.,  277 
Fowler,  W.  W.,  73 
Fransosiche  Studien,  499 
Frazer,  J.  G.,  5 

Folk-lore  in  Old  Testament,  16, 
170,  231,  341,  359,  386,  448, 
493,  688 

Golden  Bough,  5,  568 

Magic  Art,  i,  386 

Popular  Superstitions,  24 
Frederick  II,  emperor,  106,  737 
Free,  John,  52 

Freeman,  History  of  Sicily,  22 
Freind,  see  Friend 
Freud,  178 

Friend,  John,  569,  576 
Frommberger,  G.,  401 
Fronto,  537 
Frothingham,   17 
Fuchs,  380 
Funk,  F.  X.,  422 

Gaisford,  341 

Galen,   chap,  iv,  32,  56,  284,  288, 

292,  569-74,  597,  605,  613-4, 

626,   653-4,   656,   663,   666-7, 

739,  747,  754-6 
Ad   Pisonem   de    theriaca,    130, 

170,  177 
Alimentorum   facultatibus,    137, 

159 
Anatom.  administ.,  121,  123,  152 
Antidot.,  154,  171 
Cognoscendis  curandisque  animi 

mortis,  123 
Compound  medicines,   125,    152, 

160,  172 
Critical  days,  157,   179 
Diagnosis  from  Dreams,  177 
Diifcreniiis  pulsorum,  137 
Dinamidis,  727-%,  742 
Euporista,    see   Remediis   para- 

bilibus 
Foetuum  formatione,  150 
Healing  art,  176 
Hippocratic  commentaries,   119- 

21,  177,  749 
Libriis  propriis,  124,  133 
Malitia    complexionis    diversae, 

125 

Medicinal  simples,  121,  132,  158, 

166-71,  572,  611 
Methodo  medendi,  123,  127,  133, 

I55-.  178 
Naturalibus  facultatibus,  123 
Or  dine  librorum,  133 
Platonic      commentaries,      124, 

138 
Prognos.  ad  Epigenem,  124 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


819 


Remediis  parahilibus,    127,    161, 

175 

Substantia      facuitatum      natn- 
raliuni,  170 

Temperamentis,   119 

Theriaca  ad  Pamphilianum,  170 

Throat  and  lungs,  134 

Usu  partium,  119,  138,  150-1 

Venae  sectione,  125 

Victu,  119 
dubious  or  spurious 

Experiments,  162,  720 

Liber  medicinalis,  600 

Medical    Treatment   in   Homer, 
582 

Placitis  philosophorum,  180-1 

Prognostication     by     astrology, 
178 

5"^crff^,  752 

and  see  Apollonius  and 
Gamaliel,  Jewish  patriarch,  584-5 
Ganschinietz,  467 
Garcilasso,  17 
Gargilius  Martialis,  608 
Gariopontus,  577,  733 
Garrison,  F.  H.,  164 
Garrod,  H.  W.,  95 
Garver,   M.,  499 
Geber,  670,  763 
Geikie,  see  Clark  and 
Gelasius,  pope,  389,  404,  406 
Genealogus,  326 
Gentile  da  Foligno,  164 
Genesis,   i8r,    193,    34i,   386,   445, 

chap,  xxi,  521 
Geoponica,  59,  463,   604-5 
Gerard  Bituricensis,  see  Gerard  de 

Solo 
Gerard   of   Cremona,   109-10,  646, 

648,  750 
Gerard  de  Solo,  747,  749 
Gerbert,  chap,  xxx 
Gerson,  106 
Gesner,  322 
Giacosa,  P.,  731,  739 
Gibbon,  E.,  285 
Gibson,  M.  D.,  428 
Gilbert  of  England,  162,  577,  688 
Gilbert  Maminot,  673 
Giles  de  Corbeil,  73"] 
Giles,  J.,  636 

and  see  Egidius  de  Tebaldis 
Gillert,  K.,  684 
Ginzel,  F.  K.,  34 
Giovannino  di  Graziano,  682 
Giovene,  G.  M.,  686 
Giry,  A.,  764 
Glaber,  see  Raoul 
Glover,  T.  R.,  544 


Golden   Legend,    see    Jacobus    de 
Voragine 

Goldstaub,  M.,  497,  503 

Goldstaub  and  Wendriner,  499 

Gollancz,  H.,  380 

Goodwin,  W.  W.,  202-3 

Gordon,  Bernard,  688,  740 

Gospels,  674,  725,  754;  and  see  in- 
dividual names 

Gospel  of  the  Infancy,  chap,  xvi 

Goujet,  672 

Goupyl,  J.,  567 

Govi,  G.,  107 

Graetz,  349 

Gratian,  Decretum,  6301 

Gray,  C.  D.,  33 

Gray,  L.  A.,  296 

Greenwood,  J.  G.,  188 

Gregory  I,  the  Great,  pope.  Dia- 
logues, 405,  593,  637-9 

Gregory  Bar-Hebraeus,  662 

Gregory  of  Nyssa,  447,  505 
Against  Fate,  471 
Hexaemeron,  459,  481 
Ventriloquist,  470 

Grenfell,  B.  P.,  28,  293,  361 

Grenfell  and  Hunt,  361 

Griffith,  F.  L.,  7;  and  see  Thomp- 
son and 

Grimm,  Jacob,  567-8,  584 

Groff,  Egyptian  Sorcery,  7 

Grosseteste,  Robert,  106,  189 

Griitzmacher,  G.,  540 

Guido  of  Arezzo,  698 

Guinther  of  Andernach,  567,  576-7 

Guldenschoff,  J.,  477 

Gundissalinus,  744 

Guthrie,  K.,  298,  303-4,  349 

Guyot,  H.,  349 

Gwatkin,  H.  M.,  524 

Haase,  Seneca,  loi 
Haase,  F.,  373 
Hagins  the  Jew,  650 
Hain,  498 

Halliwell,  J.  O.,  706 
Hamilton,  G.  L.,  631 
Hamilton,  Mary,  688 
Hamilton,  N.  E.  S.  A.,  690 
Haly  Heben  Rodan, 

Dispositione  aeris,  647 

Pltiviis,  647 

Ptolemy's  Quadripartitum,  no 
Hammer-Jensen,  107 
Hannubius,  537 
Hansen,  J.,  2,  631 
Hardouin,  42 

Harleian     MSS,     Catalogue     of, 
684-S 


820 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


Harnack,  A.,  405 

Gesch.  dr.  altchr.  Lit.,  400 

Medicinisches     aus     d.     dltest. 
Kirchengesch.,  138-9 
Harpestreng  the  Dane,  612 
Harrington,    School    of    Salerno, 

731 
Harris,  Rendel,  23 
Harrison,  J.  E.,  22,  251,  301 
Hartel,  W.,  369 
Hartfelder,  K.,  268 
Harvard  Studies  in  Classical  Phil- 
ology, 108-9 
Harvey,  John,  291 
Haskins,   C.   H.,   702 

Adelard  of  Bath,  652,  664 

Further  Notes,  109 

Reception    of    Arabic    Science, 

.693,  773 
Haskins  and  Lockwood,  108-9 
Havell,  E.  B.,  12,  251 
Heath,  T.  L.,  29,  32,  188 
Heeg,    Pseudodemocrit.    Studien, 

733  . 
Hegel,  Philosophy  of  Religion,  i 
Hegesippus,  425-6 
Hehn,  Siebenzahl  u.  Sabbat,  16,  34 
Heiberg,  J.  L.,  105,  109,  188-9 
Heider,  G.,  498-9 
Heigl,  G.  A.,  299 
Heim,  R.,  568,  605 
Heinsch,  P.,  349 
Heintze,  W.,  399,  403,  406 
Heliodorus,  232 
Heller,  A.,  108,  188 
Helmreich,  G.,  119,  chap,  xxv 
Helpericus,  696 
Helxai,  Book  of,  372 
Hendrie,  R.,  chap,  xxxiii 
Hengstenberg,      Gesch.     Bileams, 

353,  447 
Henschel,  578,  731,  758 
Hephaestion  of  Thebes,  1 15-6,  538 
Heraclides  of  Pontus,  32 
Heraclides  of  Tarentum,  153,  495 
Heraclitus,  181 
Heraclius,  chap,  xxxiii 
Heraeus,  552 
Heras,  153 

Herbarium,  597 ;  and  see  Apuleius 
Hercher,  R.,  215,  322 
Hermanni  de  ymbribus  et  pluviis, 

647 
Hermannus  Contractus,  chap,  xxx, 

701,  728 
Hermann  of  Dalmatia,  649,  701 
Hermes,    105,    109,    121,    188,   298, 

526,    576,    595,   606,   609-10, 

612 


Hermes  Trismegistus,  178,  chap,  x, 
537,  653,  661,  710,  763 
Asclepius,  221,  290,  596 
Fifteen    Stars,    Herbs,    Stones, 

340,  664 
Images  and  Incantations,  books 

of,  664 
Poimandres,  290-1,  379 
Virgin  of  the  World,  291 
Hermippus,  524 
Hermogenes,  342,  435 
Hero  of  Alexandria,  108-9,  1^8-93, 
266,  652 
works  listed  at  188 
Herodotus,  21-2,  129,  156 
Herophilus,  32,  77,  145-6,  180 
Herrandus,  702 
Herrick,  F.  H.,  267 
Hesiod,  21,  77,  207 
Hieg,  119 
Hierocles,  246 
Hieronymus,  see  Jerome 
Higden,  see  Ranulf 
Hildebert,  498 

Hildegard  of  Bingen,  342,  432,  660 
Hilgenfeld,  A.,  399-401,  405 
Hincmar  of  Reims,  630 
Hipparchus,  32,  96,  537 
Hippocrates       (and      Hippocratic 
writings),  27,  29,  49,  58,  139, 
142,  144,  150,  178-9,  356,  571, 
625,  663,  723,  735,  747,  757 
Aphorisms,  176 
Astrology,  178-9 
Letter    to    Antigonus    or   Mae- 
cenas, 600,  724 
Hippolytus,    chaps,    xv,    xx,    107, 

278,  387,  399,  421,  482,  765 
Hirn,  Y.,  6 
Hirschberg,  J.,  566 
Histoire  Litteraire  de  la  France., 

163,  672,  etc. 
Historisch.  Jahrbuch,  541 
History     of     Three     Kings     of 

Cologne,  444,  446,  477 
Holmes  and  Kitterman,  10 
Homer,  49,  169,  245,  260,  273,  582 
Fourteefith  Epigram,  434 
and  see  Iliad  and  Odyssey 
Homily  on  Magi,  478-9 
Hommel,     Aethiop.     Physiologus, 

498,  503 
Hommel,  R,  Gestirndienst,  355 
Hone,  387,  395 

Honein  ben  Ishak,  653,  660,  752 
Honorius  of  Autun,  502 
Hooten,  12 

Hoover,  H.  C.  and  H.  L.,  132,  J29 
Hopf,  L.,  73 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


821 


Hopfner,  Papyri,  28 

Hopfner,  T.,  73 

Horapollo,  Hieroglyphics,  331-4 

Hosthanes,  see  Ostanes 

Howitt,  A.  W.,  227 

Hubert,  H.,  22,  27,  265 

Huet,  G.,  241 

Huet,  P.  D.,  354,  457-8,  461,  469 

Hugh  of  St.  Victor,  631,  658 

Bestiis,  498,  501 

Didascalicon,  389,  402 
Hugh  of  Santalla,  652 
Hugutius,  129 
Humboldt,  A.  v.,  107 
Hunain  ibn  Ishak,  see  Honein  ben 

Ishak 
Hunt,  see  Grenfell  and 
Husik,  I.,  747 
Huvelin,  P.,  6 
Hystaspes,  296 

lamblichus,  chap,  xi,  296 

Fato,  316 

Mysteriis,  288,  307ff. 
Ibn  Abi  Usaibi'a,  667 
Ibn  KhalHkan,  667 
Ignatius,  396 
Ilg,  A.,  760 
Iliad,  21,  58 
Imhoof-Blumer,  F.  und  Keller,  O., 

73 

Inchofer,  476 

Infancy,  Gospels  of,  chap,  xvi 

Inge,  W.  R.,  299 

International  Congresses,  see  Con- 
gress 

loachos,  138 

loannes,  see  John 

lolaos  the  Bithynian,  495 

Irenaeus,  chap,  xv,  411,  421,  488 

Isaac  Israeli,  658,  746ff. 

Isaiah,  460,  485 ;  Ascension  of,  399 

Isidore  of  Seville,  326,  601,  623-33, 
658,  675,  709 
Differ cntiis  verborum,  630,  632 
Etymologiae,  609,  623-33,  777 
Natura  reruni,  401,  623,  632-3 
Origines,  459,  493 
Viris  illiis.,  380 

Israelson,  L.,  141 

Itinerarium  Alcxandri,  553 

Ivo  of  Chartres,  630 

Jackson,  A.  V.  W.,  296 
Jacobitz,  282 
Jacobus  Angelus,  106 
Jacobus  de  Partibus,  567 
Jacobus  Psychrestus,  575 


Jacobus     de     Voragine,     Golden 

Legend,  427,  435,  475 
Jacques  de  Bergame,  702 
Jahn's  Neue  Jahrb.,  52 
Jahrbuch  (Austrian),  607 
Jahrb.     d.     k.     deutsch.     archdol. 

Instit.,  28 
Jahrb.    f.    Class.    Philologie,   349, 

605 
Jahrb.    f.    Philol.    u.    Pddagogik, 

105 
James,  Protevangelium  of,  chap. 

xvi 
James,  M.  R. 
Apocrypha  anecdota,  342 
Biblical  Antiquities,  351 
Cambridge  MSS,  564,  597,  602, 

723 
Canterbury  and  Dover,  753 
Eton  MSS,  52 
Janus,  578 
Janus,  L.,  42 
Jastrov/,  M.,  17,  19,  34 
Jayakar,  S.  G.,  393,  688 
Jean  Clopinel,  613 
Jennings,  H.,  291 
Jensen,  P.,  34 
Jeremias,    15,  34 
Jergis,  648 
Jerome,  369,  398,  447,  459,  461,  466, 

476,    483,    600-2,    625,    628, 

692 
Jeii,  Book  of,  378 
Jevons,  F.  B.,  22 
Jewish  Quarterly  Review,  348 
Job,  Book  of,  510,  520 
Johannitius,  see  Honein  ben  Ishak 
John,  Gospel  of,  386,  759 
John  Afflacius,  748,  757 
Tohn  Agarenus,  748 
John  Angelus,  106,  525 
John  of  Antioch,   194 
John  Crophill,  see  Crophill 
John  of  Damascus,  608 
John  of  Hildesheim,  446,  477 
jolm  of  London,  643,  714 
John  Lydus,  see  Lydus 
John  of  St.  Amand,  162-3,  725 
John  of     Salisbury,    Polycraticus, 

241,  302-3,  631,  683-4 
John  the  Scot,  500,  547,  637 
John  of  Spain,  chap,  xxviii 
Joret,  C,  II,  76 
Josephus,  354,  366,  425,  446,  703 
Joshua,  Book  of,  352 
Jourdain,  C,  672,  690 
Journal  Asiatique,  653 
Journal  des  Savants,  131 
Journal  f.  praktische  Chemie,  762, 


822 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


Journal  of  Hellenic  Studies,  266, 

301 
Journal  of  Royal  Asiatic  Society, 

337 
Jowett,  26 

Juba,  king  of  Numidia,  49,  218,  256 
Jude,  Epistle  of,  342,  435 
Julian  the  Chaldean,  296,  317 
Julian,  emperor,  317,  568 
Julian  Honorius,  601 
Julius     Firmicus     Maternus,     see 

Firmicus 
Julius  Valerius,  Res  gestae,  chap. 

xxiv 
Justinian,  575 

Digest,  356,  568 
Justin,  Book  of  Baruch,  399 
Justin  Martyr,  363,  416,  421,  469, 

476 
Juvenal,  126,  437 

Kaestner,  H.,  609 

Karpinski,  L.  C,  31 

Katrarios,  J.,  524 

Kehrer,  H.,  476 

Keil,  49-50 

Keller,  O.,  73 

Kennedy,  H.  A.  A.,  349 

Kenyon,  F.  G.,  365 

Kepler,  457,  473 

Kessler,  K.,  383 

Kidd,  J.,  147 

King,  C.  W.,  49,  174,  293,  329,  379, 

568,  775,  777 
King,  L.  W.,  17,  33 
King  James'  Version,  471 
Kings,  First  Book  of,  386 
Kirchofif,  A.,  299 
Kitterman  and  Holmes,  10 
Klatsche,  E.  H.,  24 
Kleffner,  A.  J.,  541 
Knyghton,  690 
Knudtzon,  J.  A.,  34 
Kobert,  H.,  596 
Koch,  H.,  541 
Koch,  K.,  121 
Koechly,  293 
Koeler,  G.  D.,  loi 
Koetschau,  P.,  436 
Kopp,  U.  F.,  S45-6 
Koran,  345 

Kostomoiros,  G.  A.,  566 
Krabinger,  J.  G.,  540 
Kraus,  F.  X.,  540 
Kritzinger,  473 
Krohn,  F,  183 
Kroll,  W. 

Analecta,  318-9 

Hermes,  290 


Oraculis  Chaldaicis,  297,  308 

Vettius  Valens,  116 
Kroll  and  Ausfeld,  551 
Kroll  et  Skutsch,  chap,  xxiii,  302, 

690 
Kriiper,  Jt, 
Kiibler,  B.,  551 
Kijchler,  F.,  20 
Kugler,  F.  X.,  16,  34 
Kiihn,  C.  G.,  chap,  iv,  572,  60S 
Kiister,  E.,  y^ 


Lactantius,  220,  241,  243,  246,  465, 

479 

La  Grande  Encyclopedic,  292 

Lagarde,  P.  D.,  400 

Lagrange,  M.  J.,  34 

Lamm,  O.  V.,  428 

Lancet,  119-22,  146-7 

Lancet-Clinic,  10 

Land,  Otia  Syriaca,  497-8 

Langdon,  S.,  34 

Lapidarius ,  495,  778 

Laplace,  108 

Lascaris,  C.,  424 

Lauchert,  F.,  497-501 

Laurence,  399 

Laurent,  A.,  32 

Laws  of  Henry  I,  690 

Lea,  H.  C.,  2 

Lebour,  y2> 

Leclerc,  50 

Le  Coq,  A.  v.,  383 

Leech-IBook  of  Bald  and  Cild, 
720-3 

Leemans,  682 

Lehmann,  P.,  683 

Lemaire,  42,  329 

Leminne,  J.,  139 

Lenormant,  5,  17-20,  32 

Leo  I,  the  Great,  pope,  520,  575 

Leo  Allatius,  469 

Leo,  archpriest,  557 

Leo  of  Ostia,  743 

Leonicenus,  N.,  53 

Letronne,  480 

Leucippus,  193 

Levi,  SSI 

Leviticus,  439,  459 

Lewes,  G.  H.,  29-30,  50 

Lewysohn,  73 

Libanius,  472,  538-40,  584  _ 

Library  of  Harvard  University, 
Bibliographical  Contribu- 
tions, 166 

Liddell  and  Scott,  120,  265 

Lidzbarski,  M.,  383 

Liebermann,  F.,  6go 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


823 


Liechtenstein,  P.,  642 

Lilius  Tifernates,  347 

Lindermayer,  A.,  y^ 

Linnaeus,  175 

Linus,  pope,  426 

Lippmann,    E.    O.   v.,    12,    16,    194, 

649,  670,  chap,  xxxiii 
Lipsius  et  Bonnet,  397 
Lithica,  see  Orpheus 
Lobeck,  G.  A.,  288 
Locard,  ys 

Lockwood,  see  Haskins  and 
Locy,  W.  A.,  29-30 
Lods,  A.,  341-2 
Lones,  T.  E.,  26,  29 
Lorenz,  yji 
Loth,  O.,  641,  649 
Loweneck,  M.,  733 
Loxus,  460 
Lucan,  629 
Lucian,  276-86 

Alexander,    247,    277,    379,    440, 
467-9,  561 

Apologia,  277 

Astrologia,  282-3 

Dialogues  of  the  Gods,  283 

Dipsadibus,  284 

Dream,  283 

How  to  write  history,  284-6 

Lucius,  276 

Menippus,  281,  416 

Nigrinus,  284 

Peregrinus,  277 

Philopseudes,  279 

Tragopodagra,  284 
Lucius,  349 
Lucretius,  760 
Lumby,  690 

Lupitus  of  Barcelona,  chap,  xxx 
Liiring,  H.  L,  10 
Luther,  Martin,  651 
Lycon,  237 
Lydus,  John,  635 
Lydus,  Laurentius,  240 


Macdonald,  D.  B.,  232,  356,  699 
Macer   Floridus,  De   viribus  her- 

barum,  612-5 
Macer,  Theophilus,  761 
Mackinnon,  639 
Macray,  642,  705 
Macrobius,  355,  544-5 
Dream  of  Scipio,  302,  500,  544, 

709  . 
Saturnalia,  302,  545 
Mahaffy,  J.  P.,  135 
Mai,  Classici  auctores,  498 
Maimonides,  Moses 


Aphorisms,  138,   151,   164,   176-7 
'More  Nevochim,,  358 
Maklu,  18 
Male,  E.,  390,  397,  427,  435,  475-6, 

502 
Manetho,  289,  292-3 
Mangey,  348 
Manilius,  95,  690-1 
Manitius,  Max,  619,  622,  631 
Mann,  M.  F.,  497-9 
Mansi,  499 
Mantuani,  J.,  607 

Mappe  clavicula,  468,  chap,  xxxiii 
Marbod,  463,  761,  chap,  xxxiv 
Fato  et  gene  si,  781-2 
Lapidum,  775-81 
Marcellus,  disciple  of  Peter,  425 
Marcellus    Empiricus,    chap,    xxv, 

595,  600,  608,  724,  767 
Marcianus,  see  Martianus 
Marco  Polo,  132,  214,  479,  564 
Marett,  R.  R.,  6,  22 
Margoliouth,  746 
Marianus  Scotus,  686,  692 
Marinelli,  480 
Marinus,    107 

Marinus,  Life  of  Proclus,  686 
Mark,  Gospel  of,  386 
Mark,  K.  F.  H.,  146 
Marquardt,  L,  119 
Martianus  Capella,  326,  545-6,  677, 

709 
Martin,  Heron,  188 
Martin,  J.,  Philon,  347 
Martin,  see  Cahier  and 
Martyrium  of  Cyprian  and  Jus- 

tina,  428 
Marx,  A.,  73 
Marx,  F.,  423 
Mary  the  Jewess,  196-7 
Masselieau,  L.,  349 
Matthew,     Gospel    of,    397,    455, 

47 iff.,  730;  Pseudo-,  390 
Maximus,  426 
Maximus  of  Aegae,  244 
Maximus  Taurinensis,  425 
McKenzie,  K.,  499 
Mead,  G.  R.  S.,  290,  299,  369,  374, 

377-8,  401,  42s 
Mechitarists,  95,  366 
Medicae  artis  principes,  566ff. 
Medici  antiqui,  567,  612 
Mela,  see  Pomponius 
Memoires    couronnes    par    VAca- 

dcmie  de  Belgique,  139 
Menander,  22,  49 
Menecrates,  135 
Menelbus,  574 
,  Mentz,  F.,  76 


824 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


Mercurius  Cilenius  (or  Tillemus), 
652;  and  see  Hermes 

Merrifield,  Mrs.,  chap,  xxxiii 

Merx,  A.,  121,  t,72> 

Mesue  (Yuhanna  ibn  Masawaih), 
162,  164 

Metrodorus,  Letter  to  Celsus,  441 

Metrodorus,  Byzantine  gram- 
marian, 575 

Meusel,  551 

Mewaldt,  119,  176 

Meyer,  E.  v.,  772 

Meyer,  M.  P.  H.,  551 

Meyer-Steineg,  T.,  121 

Micah,  352 

Michael  Scot,  664,  704,  710 

Migne,  Diet.  d.  Apocryphes,  397 

Mills,  L.  H.,  349 

Milne,  J.  S.,  145 

Milward,  E.,  137,  chap,  xxv 

Minucius  Felix,  465 

Miskati,  18 

Mithridates,  87,  171,  495 

Mitteilungen  d.  anthrop.  Gesell.  in 
Wien,  16 

Mitteilungen  d.  Vorderasiat. 
Gesell,  473 

Modern     Language     Publications, 

499 
Moeragenes  (or  Moiragenes),  244, 

246,  253,  448 
Molbech,  C,  612 
Mommsen,  T.,  73,  326-31,  526,  601, 

695 

Monaci,  E.,  499 

Monist,  The,  630 

Montgomery,  J.  A.,  384 

Moon-Books,  chap,  xxix 

Morellus  Federicus,  538 

Moret,  A.,  7 

Morf,  H.,  552 

Morfill  and  Charles,  chap,  xiii 

Morgan,  M.  H.,  183-8 

Morgenl'dndische  Forschungen,  642 

Morienus  Romanus,  697,  761 

Moser,  G.  H.,  299 

Moses  the  law-giver,  59,  137-8, 
151,   19s,  350,  357,  437,   507 

Moses  ben  Maimon,  or,  of  Cor- 
dova, see  Maimonides 

Moses  ibn  Tibbon,  749 

Moyen  Age,  Le,  241 

Mucianus,  81 

Mueller,  L,  119 

Muhammad  b.  Muh.  b.  Tarchan  b. 
Uzlag,  Abti  Nasr,  see  Al- 
Farabi 

Muhammad  ibn  Zakariya,  see 
Rasis 


Miihle,  H.  v.  d.,  TZy  132 

Muir,  W.,  ZZT,  642 

Miiller,  667 

Miiller,  C,  106,  215,  466,  552 

Miiller,  F.  W.  K.,  479 

Miiller,  H.  F.,  299 

Miinter,  Stern  der   Weisen,  354-Si 

443,  473. 

Muratori,  Antiquitates,  764 

Murray,  M.  A.,  2 

Musa     ibn     Maimon,     see     Mai- 
monides 

Musaeus,   77 

Musee  Guimet,  7,  360 

Nagy,  A.,  641,  646 
Nallino,  C.  A.,  106 
Hansen's  North  Polar  Expedition, 

Reports  of,  491 
Nau,  F.,  374 
Naude,  G.,  234 
Navigius,  537 
Naville,  E.,  7 
Nechepso,  173 
Nechepso   and    Petosiris,   95,   293, 

537,  682-3,  714 
Neckam,  Alexander,  342,  658,  772 
Negri,  671 
Nehemiah,  352 
Nemesius,  752 
Nepos,  Chabrias,  558 
Neue  Jahrbuch,  14,  34,  292 
Neues  Archiv  d.  Gesell.  f.  alt  ere 

deutsche      Geschichtskunde, 

684 
Newton,  Diet,  of  Birds,  267 
Nicander,  172,  236-7,  495 
Nicephorus,  457 
Nicholson,  R.  A.,  6 
Nicodemus,  Gospel  of,  390,  395 
Nielsen,  D.,  355 
Nigidius  Figulus,  515 
Nisard,  544 
Nix,  653 
Noeldeke,  552 
Nonus,  569 

Notker,  Labeo,  677,  728 
Numbers,  444 
Numenius,  443 
Numisianus,   123 
Nussey,  D.,  see  Male,  E. 

Odo  of  Meung,  613 

Odo  of  Morimont,  613 

Odo  of  Tournai,  673 

Odo  of  Verona,  613 

Odyssey,  58 

Oefele,  v.,  473 

Oesterley,  W.  O.  E.,  351,  399 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


82s 


Olleris,  706 

Olympiodorus,   195-6,  292 

Onesicritus,  553 

Oppert,  J.,  34 

Oribasius,     163,    568ff.,    607,    613, 

746 
Origen,  chap,  xix,  466,  469,  482-3, 
499,  506 
Biblical     Commentaries,     444-51 

.  454.. 457,  461 
Principiis,  456,  520-1 
Reply  to  Celsus,  chap,  xix,  246, 
277,  282,  342,  365-6 
Orosius,  519,  556,  601 
Orpheus,  58,  65,  195,  206,  234,  282, 
291,  293 
Argonautica,  293 
Lithica,  293-6,  463,  777 
Orr,  M.  A.,  16,  116,  192,  340,  619 
Osann,  596 

Ostanes  or  Osthanes,  22,  58-9,  61, 
196-8,  234,  296,  463,  46s,  558, 
582,  763 
Otho  of  Cremona,  612 
Ovid,  612 

Halietiticon,  74 
Vetula  (spurious),  691 
Owen,  A.  S.,  see  Butler  and 

Padm^uthiun    Acheksandri    Make- 
tonaz-umi,  552 

Pagel,  J.  L.,  163 

Palaemo,  Q.  Remnius  Fannius,  761 

Palladius,  556,  569 

Pamphilus,    154,    166-7,    178,    288, 
291,  495 

Panaetius,  268 

Panckoucke,  52,  loi 

Pandulf  of  Capua,  753 

Pannier,  L.,  775 

Panodorus,  194 

Pappus,    109 

Paret,  381 

Parthenius,  215 

Parthey,  G.,  307,  365 

Patrick,  St.,  640 

Paul,  the  apostle,  405,  556 

Paul  of  Aegina,  56SfI.,  721,  746 

Paul  of  Alexandria,  116 

Pauly  and  Wissowa,  124,  213,  241, 
290 

Pausanias,  214 

Payne,  J.  F. 
English  Medicine,  569,  721,  733 
Relation    of   Harvey    to    Galen, 
iig-22,  145-7 

Peiper,  R.,  6i9ff. 

Pelliot,  see  Chavannes  and 

PelopS;  123,  170 


Pentateuch,  350 

Pertz,  702 

Petavius,  363,  540,  etc. 

Petavius,  D.,  575 

Peter,  the  apostle,  chap,  xvii 

Acts  of,  405 

Second  Epistle  of,  446 

Teachings  of,  405 
Peter  of  Abano,  see  Abano 
Peter  the  Archiater,  569 
Peter  the  Deacon,  chap,  xxxii 
Peter  of  Spain,  163 
Petermann,  see  Schwartze  and 
Peters,  E.,  497 
Petosiris,  682-3 ;  and  see  Nechepso 

and 
Petrie,  F.,  12 
Petrocellus,  659,  733-6 
Petrograd    Acad.    Scient.    Imper. 

Mcmoircs,  428 
Pez,  Thesaurus  Anecdot.  Noviss., 

698,  701,  706 
Pfister,  F,  552,  556-7,  565 
Pherecydes,  270-1,  574 
Philagrius,  567,  577 
Philastrius,  423 
Philip,     disciple     of     Bardesanes, 

374 
Philip,    translator    of    Horapollo, 

331 
Philip  of  Thaon,  498 
Phillipps,  T.,  760 
Philo,  cited  on  plants,  495 
Philo  Judaeus,  chap,  xiv,  302,  447, 
457,  492 
Alexander,  351 
Allegories,  357 
Biblical  Antiquities    (spurious), 

351        .         . 

Contemplative  Life,  349-50,  356 

Creation,  348 

Dreams,  351-3,  357-8 

Excircumcisione ,  349 

Gigantibus,  353 

Law  concerning  murderers,  352 

Migratione  Abrahami,  353-4 

Monorchia,  353-4 

Mundi  opificio,  350,  353-7 

Providentia,  351 

Quod    omnis    probus    liber    sit, 
352 

Vita  Mosis,  351,  353,  357 

Virtutibus,  351 
Philolaus,  181,  296 
Philologus,  292,  429,  497,  540,  683 
Philostratus, 

Apollonius  of  Tyana,  chap,  viii, 
205,  329,  392,  406,  410 

Sophists,  322 


826 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


Philumenus,  567,  577 
Photius,  276,  338 
Physiologus,  490,  497-503 
Picatrix,  665 

Pico  della  Mirandola,  603 
Pietschmann,  R.,  288 
Pighinuccius,   T.,   596 
Pilate,  Acts  of,  390 
Pindar,  266 
Piper,  677 
Piso,  574 

Piso,  Domitius,  44 
Pistis-Sophia,  364,  377-9 
Pitra,  J.  B. 
Analecta  Sacra,  291,  297 
Spicilegium,  463,  497ff.,  636,  777 
Platearius,    Matthaeus   the   Elder, 

738 
Plato,  22,  24-6,  58,  61,  137,  139, 
1 51-2,  1 80- 1,  235,  240,  247, 
290,  303,  349-50,  353,  355, 
460,  519,  532,  622,  632,  713 
Laws,  25 

Republic,  26,  138,  212 
Symposium,  25 

Timaeus,    24-6,    237,    297,    408, 
476,  620 
Plato  of  Tivoli,  no 
Pliny  the  Elder,  Natural  History, 
chap,    a,    3,    100,    132,    154, 
187-8,    193,    199,   213-4,  238, 
248,  255,  257,  268,  273,  292-3, 
296,    322,    325,    327-9,    331, 
351,    503,    510,    558,    571-2, 
589-91,    612,    614,    624,    626, 
628,  727,  761,  764,  766,  780 
Other  works  listed,  45 
Medicina  Plinii,  52,  577,  595-6 
Pliny  the  Younger,  45,  48,  50 
Plotinus,  chap,  xi,  361-2,  5z^2 
Plutarch,   chap,  vi,  180,  269,  355, 
481,  669 
Agesilaus,  558 
Alexander,  552 
Banquet  of  Seven  Sages,  218 
Bruta  ratione  uti,  217 
Defectu    oraculorum,    203,    205, 

212-3,  219,  278 
Ei  apud  Delphos,  205,  212 
Facie  in  orbe  lunae,  206,  211,  219 
Genio  Socratis,  205,  207,  240 
Isis  and  Osiris,  219 
Lives,  201,  244 
Principle  of  Cold,  218 
Procreation  of  Soul,  212 
Pythiac  oraculis,  205 
Quacstiones  naturales,  217,  219 
Romulus,  209,  330 
Sera  numinis  vindicta,  213 


Solertia  animalium>,  218 
Superstitione,  203-4 
Symposiacs,  205,  21 1-3,  217,  219 
Whether  an  old  man  should  en- 
gage in  politics,  201 
dubious  or  spurious 
Fato,  202,  210 
Institutione  principis,  200 
Placitis   philosophorum,   202 
Rivers  and  Mountains,  202,  215 
Pognon,  H.,  384 
Poiree,  see  Ruelle  et 
Polemon,  460 
Politian,  53 
Polybius,  245 
Pomponius  Mela,  328-9 
Ponce  de  Leon,  499 
Poole,   R.   L.,  Medieval  Thought, 

617,  634 
Porphyry,  chap,  xi,  535 
Abstinentia,  314,  317 
Introduction  to  Tetrabiblos,  116, 

316 
Letter  to  Anebo,  307-20 
Philosophia  ex  oraculis,  297 
Vita  Plotini,  296,  300-2 
Posidonius,  in 
Prachter,  K.,  541 
Preisendanz,  K.,  28 
Preller,  L.,  296,  429 
Premerstein,  A.  v.,  607 
Frenostica  Fitagorice,  684 
Preuschen,  E.,  366 
Priaulx,  Indian  Travels,  244 
Prince,  J.  D.,  15 
Priscian,  326,  761 
Priscillian,  380-1,  461 
Proceedings,     Biblical     Archaeol- 
ogy, 33 
Proceedings,    Royal    Society     of 

Medicine,  284 
Procharus,  397 
Proclus,  116,  307,  316 

Sacriiicio  et  magia,  319-20 
Protevangelium   of   lanves,    chap. 

xvi 
Pruckner,  M.,  525 
Prudentius,  500 

Psalms  and  Psalter,  442,  521,  759 
Psellus,   Michael,  290,  569,  772 
Ptolemy,    chap.    Hi,    32,    118,    135, 
272,  307,  341,  537.  661,  664, 
666,  703,  709-10,  737 
Almagest,  105-9 
Centiloquium,  in 
Exortatio  ad  artem,  693 
Geography,  105-7 
Music,  107 
Optics,  107-8 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


827 


Planisphere,  699 
Quadripartitum,  see  Tetrabiblos 
Speculis,  189 
Tetrabiblos,     110-16,    303,     517, 

690-1 
Puccinotti,  Storia  delle  Medicine, 

chap,  xxxii 
Puschmann,  T. 
Alexander     v.     Tralles,     s67ff-. 

577ff- 
Hist,     of    Medical    Education, 

120-1,  129,  143,  569,  731 
Pythagoras,  50,  58,  61-3,  65-6,  80, 

91-2,   176,   1 80- 1,  204,  232-4, 

247,  263,  269,  274,  288,  317, 

349-50,  3SS>  2,73,  532 
Precepta,  696 
Prenostica,  684 
Sphere  of,  chap,  xxix,  370 

Quadripartitus,  690 
Quid  pro  quo,  608 
Quiggin,  E.  C,  640 
Quilichinus,  Aretinus,  558 
Quintillian,  Pseudo-,  540 

Rabanus    Maurus,    402,    484,   617, 
630,  634,  673 

Radloff,  W.,  382 

Raidel,  G.  M.,   106 

Ramsay,  W.  M.,  106 

Rand,  E.  K.,  619 

Ranking,  G.  S.  A.,  667-71 

Ranulf  Higden,  690 

Raoul  Glaber,  674 

Rasche,  C,  307 

Rashdall,  H.,  731,  757 

Rasis,  164,  653,  667-71,  748 
works  listed,  668 

Ratdolt,  E.,  649 

Read,  C,  5 

Realencyklopadie     f.      protest. 
Theol,  381,  399 

Regimen  Salernitanum,  736ff. 

Reginald  or  Retinaldus,  52 

Regulae  .  .  .  de   compositione   as- 
tro lapsus,  699 

Reinach,  S.,  6 

Reisner,  G.  A.,  34 

Reitzenstein,  R.,  290,  379,  553 

Renzi,  S.  D.,  Collectio  Salertiitana, 
578,  600,  660,  chap,  xxxi 

Reuss,  F.  A.,  613 

Reuvens,  369 

Revelation,  Book  of,  386 

Reville,  J.,  350 

Revue  des  Studes  anciennes,  672 

Revue  des  Etudes  juives,  551 

Revue  d.  I'hist.  d.  religs.,  341,  349 


Revue  Phil,  291 

Revue  des  Questions*Historiques, 

113,  690 
Rhazes,  see  Rasis 
Rhein.  Mus.,  52 

Richardson,  E.  C,  400,  403,  406 
Richer,  704,  733 
Riegler,  see  Axt  and 
Riess,  E.,  24,  292-3,  683 
Riley,  H.  T.,  see  Bostock  and 
Robert,  498 
Robert  of   Chester,  648,  697,  761, 

772, 
Robertson  Smith,  W.,  34 
Roger  Bacon,  see  Bacon 
Rohde,  Psyche,  293 
Rolleston,  J.  D.,  284 
Rom.  Forsch.,  610 
Roinanic  Review,  499,  631 
Roscher-,  Lexicon,  34 
Rose,  v.,  120,  463,  567,  576,  601 

Analecta,  121 

Anecdota,  596,  610 

Aristoteles    De    lapidibus,    775, 

777 
HSS    Verseichnisse,    702,    720, 

748,  774 
Medicina   Plinii,   595,   600,    609, 

612 
Ptolemaeus,  612 
Soranus,  571 
Roussat,  R.,  116 
Roux  de  Rochelle,  564 
Rijck,  Plinius  im  Mittelalter,  51 
Ruelle,  19s,  291 ;  and  see  Berthelot 

and 
Ruelle  et  Poiree,  371 
Ruellius,  600 
Rufifer,   M.  A.,   11 
Rufinus,  chap,  xvii,  445 
Rufus,  Melancholia,  756 
Ruska,  J.,  611 

Sackur,  Sibyl,  Texte,  285 
Sadan,  651 

St.  George  Stock,  362 
Salmon,  G.,  362 
Salomon  the  archiater,  161 
Samuel,  First  Book  of,  448 
Satyrus,  123 
Sayce,  A.  H.,  35 
Schanz,   596 
Schenkel,  C.,  483 
Schepss,  G.,  381,  519 
Schiaparelli,  16,  32,  35 
Schiche,  T.,  268 
Schlurick,  H.,  400 
Schmertosch,  R.,  202 
Schmid,  W.,  105,  108 


828 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


Schmidt,  i88 

Schmidt,  C,  299,  361,  377-8 

Schneider,  J.  G.,  237 

Schneider,  O.,  237 

Schneidewin,  466 

Schuhze,  v.,  497 

Schwab,  M.,  33 

Schwartze    und    Petermann,    369, 

377 

Scientific  Monthly,  194 

Scribonius  Largus,  600 

Scylax,  256 

Seeck,  O.,  540 

Seleucus,  289 

Seneca 
Natural     Questions,     chap,     in, 

196,  542,  553 
Apocryphal  correspondence  with 
the  apostle  Paul,  556 

Septuagint,  453,  459 

Serapion,  610 

Serenus  Sammonicus,  608 

Seth,  365,  474 

Sethe,  9 

Sextus  Empiricus,  116,  269,  275-6, 
469 

Sextus  Papirius  Placidus,  599 

Shakespeare,  772 

Shelley,  432 

Sibylline  Books,  272,  285 

Sigebertus   Gemblacensis,  613 

Sijthoff,  A.  W.,  607 

Sikes,  E.  E.,  21 

Silvester  II,  pope,  see  Gerbert 

Simon  Cephas,  Teaching  of,  424 

Simon  Gordo  of  Genoa,  567,  610 

Simon  Papiensis,  525 

Simon,  the  heretic,  Great  Declara- 
tion, 362 ;  and  see  Simon 
Magus  in  other  index 

Simonides,  574 

Singer,  Charles,  345,  597,  607,  609, 
660,  674 

Sitsungsherichte   (Bavaria),  51 

Sitsungsberichte    (Berlin),   121 

Sitsungsherichte   (Erlangen),  763, 

775 
Sitsungsberichte  (Heidelberg),  34, 

524 
Skutsch,  see  Kroll  et 
Smith,    Diet.    Greek    and    Roman 

Biography,  108 
Smithsonian  Report,  773 
Smyly,  J.  G.,  293 
Societas  Regia  Scientiarum,  468 
Solinus,    326-31,    510,    601,    625-7, 

777 
Solomon,  195,  451 
Sophocles,  49 


Sortes  sanctorum,  630-1,  727 
Spencer,  Herbert,  5 
Sphera  cuin  comm-entis,  109 
Sphere   of  Life  and  Death,   197, 

chap,  xxix 
Spiegel,  Alexandersage,  552 
Spon,  J.,  379 
Sprengel,  K.,  606 
Stadler,  H.,  613 
Steele,     R.,     Roger    Bacon,    342, 

602 
Steinschneider,  M.,  669 

Apollonius  V.  Thyana,  267 
Constantinus      Africanus,      657, 

74273,  745,  749,  756 
Europdisch.  Ubersetz.,  288,  chap. 

xxviii,  711 
Pseudepig.  Lit.,  578 
Stephanus,  alchemist,  196,  292 
Stephanus,  Medicae  artis  principes, 

566ff. 
Stephen  of  Alexandria,  569 
Stephen  of  Athens,  607 
Stephen  of  Pisa,  747-9 
Stobaeus,  290 
Stowe  Missal,  640 
Strabo,  213;  and  see  Walafrid 
Strassmeier,  J.  N.,  see  Epping  and 
Strzygovi^ski,  J.,  497 
Stubbs,  W.,  77Z 
Stiicken,  15,  35 
Studi  Romansi,  499 
Stumfall,  B.,  241 
Sudhoff,  K.,  188,  683,  737 
Suetonius,  244,  425,  601 
Sulla,  Memoirs,  201 
Sulpicius  Severus,  381,  423,  469 
Sundevall,  73 
Symeon  Seth,  164 
Symon,   see  Simon 
Syncellus,  194,  196,  341 
Synesius  of  (Zyrene,  196,  320,  533, 

540-4,  555 

Tabit  ben   Corra,  see  Thebit  ben 

Corat 
Tacitus,  201,  241 
Tallquist,  K.  L.,  33 
Talmud,  355 
Taylor,   H.   O.,   533 
Taylor,  T.,  299,  307 
Tennulius,  316 
Tertullian,  447,  469,  476,  628 

Anima,  463,  469 

Apology,  463,  465 

Cultu  feminarum,  463 

Idolatria,  421 

Pallio,  493 

Praescript.,  369 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


829 


Testaments  of  Twelve  Patriarchs, 

345 
Texte   und    Untersuchnngcn,   299, 

Book  II  passim 
Thabit  ben  Corra,  see  Thebit  ben 

Corat 
Thales,  97,  563 
Thatcher,  G.  W.,  383 
Theatrum  chcmicum  Britannicum, 

see  Ashmole,  E. 
Thebit  ben  Corat,  661-6 

Almagest,  109 

Imaginibus,  664-6 

ludiciis,  664 

Motu  octave  spere,  663 

Ponderibus,  663 
Theobald,  498,  500 
Theocritus,  22,  266 
Theodoret,  369,  423,  447 
Theodorus  Priscianus,  608 
Theodosian  Code,  536,  584 
Theol.  Quartalschrift,  540 
Theon  of  Alexandria,  109 
Theophilus,  medical  writer,  569 
Theophilus  of  Alexandria,  461 
Theophilus,     To    Autolycus,    483, 

492 
Theophilus,   Schcdula   diversarum 

artium,  chap,  xxxiii 
Theophilus  Macer,  see  Macer 
Theophrastus,  27,  29,  75,  81,   186, 

236-8 
Thessalus,   127 
Thilo,  J.  C,  387,  476 
Thomas,   apostle. 

Acts  of,  374.  396 

Gospel  of,  chap,  xvi 
Thomas    of    Cantimpre,    503,    578, 

600,  636,  658 
Thomas,  W.  I.,  5,  17 
Thompson,  D'Arcy  W. 

Aristotle  as  Biologist,  29-30,  73, 
146 

Glossary    of    Greek    Birds,    73, 
130,  25s,  265,  324 

History  of  Animals,  26,  30,  73, 
491 
Thompson,  C.  J.  S.,  131 
Thompson,  H.,  7,  27-8 
Thompson,  R.  C,  15,  18,  33 
Thorndike,  L.,  21,  26,  525 
Thrasyllus,   99 
Thucydides,  244 
Tischendorf,  chap,  xvi 
Tittel,  K.,  193 
Tobit,  Book  of,  688 
Todd,  T.  W.,  10,  723 
Torinus,  A.,  567,  577 
Tozer,  131 


Transactions  of  American  Philo- 
logical Association,  24,  28, 
293 

Transactions  of  Provincial  Medi- 
cal and  Surgical  Associa- 
tion, 147 

Transactions  of  Society  of  Biblical 
Archaeology,  35 

Treitel,  L.,  349 

Tribonian,  568 

Trithemius,  658,  702 

Trotula,  740 

Turner,  S.,  633 

Twelve  Tables,  234 

Twysden,  690 

Tycho  Brahe,  457 

Tychsen,  O.  G.,  497 

Tyrwhitt,  293 

Unger,  F.,  76 

University   of   Nebraska   Studies, 

24 
Usener,  619 

Valentinelli,  J.,  164 

Valerius    Soranus,    50;    and    see 

Julius  Valerius 
Valois,    N.,   402 
Valpy,  42 

Varro,  50,  209,  239,  330,  625 
Vedas,  251 

Vergil,  97,  544,  601,  612,  691 
Vettius  Valens,  116 
Vincent    of     Beauvais,    342,    389, 

402-3,    503,    600,    658,    660, 

669-70,  687,  744,  757 
Vindanius  Anatolius,  604 
Vir  chow's     Archiv,     668,     chap. 

xxxii 
Virolleaud,  C,  35 
Vitruvius,  143,  183-8,  199,  601 
Vogelstein,  552 
Vogl,  S.,  see  Bjornbo  and 
Voigt,  H.  G.,  473 
Volkmann,  R.,  299,  540 
Vossius,  I.,  256 
Vulgate,  688 

Waitz,  H.,  400,  405,  663 
Walafrid  Strabo,  612-3,  615 
Walker,  A.,  3^7 
Waztalkora,  699 
Webb,  C.  C.  I.,  303.  631,  684 
Weber,  C.  F.  and  Caesar,  J.,  426 
Weber,  O.,  33 
Webster,  H.,  16,  686 
Weissenberger,   B.,  202 
Wellmann,  M.,  121,  138,  606,  608, 
610 


830 


BIBLIOGRAPHICAL  INDEX 


Wendland,  P.,  348,  350 
Wescher,  C,  188 
Wessely,  C,  365,  607 
Westenberger,  119 
Westermann,  A.,   552 
Westermarck,  E.,  yz 
Wickersheimer,  E.,  673-4,  683,  692, 

698,  702 
Wiedemann,  A.,  7-8,  14 
Wiedemann,  E.,  649,  y6z 
Wilcken,  12 

William  of  Auvergne,  402,  725 
William  le  Clerc,  497-9 
William     of      Malmesbury,     690, 

704-6,  710,  714 
William  of  Moerbeke,  179 
William  de  Saliceto,  601 
Wimmer,  see  Aubert  and 
Winckler,  15,  35 
Windelband,  W.,  26 
Windisch,  H.,  349 
Windischmann,  296 
Winsor,  J.,  106 
Withington,  E.,  520,  667-8 
Wolf,  C,  607 
Wolf,  H.,  316 
Wolff,  G.,  297 

Woltmann  and  Woermann,  607 
Woolston,  T.,  388 
Wright,  T.,  556 
Wiinsch,  R.,  28,  366 
Wuttke,  M.  H.,  601 


Wynkyn  de  Worde,  478 
Wyttenbach,  299 

Xanthus,  75 

Xenocrates  Aphrodisiensis,  167 
Xenophanes,    180,   270 
Xenophon,  22 

Ya'kub  ibn  Ishak  ibn  Sabbah,  see 

Alkindi 
Yonge,  C.  D.,  349 
Yuhanna      ibn      Masawaih,      see 

Mesne 
Yule,    H.,   Marco   Polo,   132,   214, 

479 

Zacher,  J.,  chap,  xxiv 
Zeitschrift  f.  aegypt.  Sprache,  10, 

35 
Zeitschrift  f.   deutsch.  Morgendl. 

GeselL,  121,  267 
Zeitschrift  f.  klass.  Philol.,  752 
Zeitschrift  f.  Math.,  661 
Zeitschrift  f.  neutest.  Wiss.,  401 
Zeitschrift  /,,  wiss.  TheoL,  400 
Zeller,  E.,  24,  316 
Zervos,  S.,  566 
Ziegler,  K.,  chap,  xxiii 
Zimmern,  19,  32,  34 
Zopyrus,  460 
Zoroaster,  58-9,  206,  235,  281,  295, 

396,  415,  435,  605,  629 
Zosimus,  131,  195,  198,  290,  292 


INDEX  OF  MANUSCRIPTS 


Additional  8928,  p.  609 
Additional  11035,  p.  500 
Additional  15236,  pp.  694,  716 
Additional  17808,  chap,   xxx 
Additional  22398,  p.  695 
Additional  22719,  p.  654 
Additional  341 11,  p.  578 
Alengon   10,  p.  484 
Amiens  222,  p.  634 
Amiens  481,  p.  478 
Amiens    fonds    Lescalopier    2, 

676 
Amiens   fonds   Lescalopier  30, 

484 
Amplon.  Folio  41,  p.  611 
Amplon.  Octavo  62,  p.  747 
Amplon.  Octavo  62a,  p.  612 
Amplon.  Octavo  62b,  p.  612 
Amplon.  Quarto  12,  p.  558 
Amplon.  Quarto   151,  p.   643 
Amplon.  Quarto  174,  p.  665 
Amplon.  Quarto  204,  p.  578 
Amplon.  Quarto  312,  p.  664 
Amplon.  Quarto  349,  p.  643 
Amplon.  Quarto  352,  p.  651 
Amplon.  Quarto  365,  p.  650 
Amplon.  Quarto  380,  p.  694 
Amplon.  Quarto  381,  p.  340 
Amplon.  Math.  48,  643 
Amplon.  Math.  53,  p.  340 
Amplon.  Math.  54,  p.  267 
Arsenal  880,  p.  650 
Arsenal  981,  p.   106 
Arsenal  1036,  p.  650 
Arundel  242,  p.  556 
Arundel  295,  p.  615 
Arundel  319,  p.  683 
Ashburnham    (Florence)     130, 

682 
Ashmole  179,  p.  648 
Ashmole  189,  p.  681 
Ashmole  209,  p.  648 
Ashmole  346,   p.  665 
Ashmole  361,  pp.  681,  688 
Ashmole  369,  pp.  648,  714 
Ashmole  369-V,  p.  650 
Ashmole  393,  p.  650 
Ashmole  434,  p.  648 
Ashmole  143 1,  pp.  597,  599,  609 
Ashmole  1462,  p.  597 
Ayranches  235,  p.  664 


P- 


Balliol  124,  p.  52 

Balliol  146A,  p.  52 

Balliol  231,  p.  121 

Bamberg  L-III-9,  pp.  610,  747 

Barberini  (Rome)  IX,  29,  p.  609 

Berlin  128,  p.  634 

634 

695 

720 

477 
477 
748 
163 
163 


Berlin  130,  p. 

Berlin  131,  p. 

Berlin  165,  p. 

Berlin  799,  p. 

Berlin  800,  p. 

Berlin  898,  p. 

Berlin  902,  p. 

Berlin  903,  p. 

Berlin  956,  pp.  702,  774 

Berlin  963,  pp.  340,  665 

Berlin  964,  p.  665 

Bernard  2325,  p.  478 

BN  Greek  930,   p.  401 

BN  Greek  2179,  p.  607 

BN  Greek  2316,  p.  578 

BN  nouv.   acq.   229,   pp.  677,  702, 

725,  728ff. 
BN  nouv.  acq.  490,  p.  484 
BN  nouv.  acq.  616,  p.  643 
BN  nouv.  acq.  1612,  p.  634 
BN  nouv.  acq.  1615,  p.  634 
BN  nouv.  acq.  1616,  chap,  xxix 
BN  nouv.  acq.  1619,  p.  571 
BN  nouv.  acq.  1632,  p.  634 
BN  1701  and   1702,  p.  484 
BN  1718  to  1727,  p.  484 
BN  1 787 A,  p.  484 
BN  2200,  p.  484 

484 
710 

77^ 


831 


BN  2387, 
BN  2598, 
BN  2621, 
BN  2633, 
BN  2637, 
BN  2638, 
BN  2695A, 
BN  2780,  p 
BN  2874,  P 
BN  3660A, 
BN  3836,  p 
BN  4126,  p 
BN  4161,  p 
BN  4801  to 
BN  4838,  p 
BN  4877,  P 
BN  4880,  p 


484 

484 
P-  556 

500 

556 
pp.  681-2 

484 

556 

714 
4804,  p.  106 

106 

556 

556 


832 


INDEX  OF  MANUSCRIPTS 


BN  S062,  p.  556 

BN  5239,  p.  692 

BN  5543,  p.  634 

BN  6121,  p.  556 

BN  6186,  p.  556 

BN  6296,  p.  657 

BN  6319,  p.  657 

BN  6322,  p.  657 

BN  6323 A,  p.  657 

BN  6325,  p.  657 

BN  6365,  p.  556 

BN  6385,  p.  556 

BN  6503,  p.  556 

BN  6514,  pp.  664,  670 

BN  6567A,  p.  657 

BN  6569,  p.  657 

BN  6811,  p.  556 

BN  6831,  p.  556 

BN  6880,  pp.  567,  584 

BN  6881,  p.  577 

BN  6882,  p.  577 

BN  6954,  p.  600 

BN  6957,  p.  600 

BN  6978,  p.  648 

BN  7028,  pp.  674,  728 

BN  7156,  p.  670 

BN  7195,  p.  663 

BN  7282,  p.  665 

BN  7299 A,  pp.  676,  679,  686,  696 

BN  7316,  pp.  647,  652 

BN  7328,  p.  647 

BN  7329,  p.  652 

BN  7332,  p.  647 

BN  7Z27,  pp.  664,  687 

BN  7349,  p.  716 

BN  7351,  p.  716 

BN  jzyy'^,  P-  663 

BN  7412,  p.  699 

BN  7418,  pp.  463,  777 

BN  7424,  p.  663 

BN  7440,  p.  647 

BN  7482,  p.  647 

BN  7486,  pp.  693,  716 

BN  7561,  p.  556 

BN  8247,  p.  657 

BN  8S01A,  p.  556 

BN  8518,  p.  556 

BN  8521A,  p.  556 

BN  8607,  p.  556 

BN  9332,  pp.  571,  576,  610 

BN  10233,  p.  571 

BN  10260,  p.  663 

BN  10271,  p.  715 

BN  1 1 624,  p.  484 

BN  12134,  P-  484 

BN  1213s,  P-  484 

BN  12136,  p.  484 

BN  12995,  P-  609 

BN  13014,  p.  340 


BN  13336,  p.  484 

BN  13350,  p.  445 

BN  13951,  p.  267 

BN  14700,  p.  744 

BN  14847,  p.  484 

BN  1568s,  p.  634 

BN  16082,  p.  657 

BN  16083,  p.  657 

BN  16088,  p.  657 

BN  16142,  p.  657 

BN  16204,  p.  650 

BN  162 16,  p.  696 

BN  16490,  p.  657 

BN  16819,  pp.  476,  478 

BN  17868,  p.  683,  chap.  XXX 

Bodleian  26,    p.    694 

Bodleian  177,  p.  694 

Bodleian  266,  pp.  664,  705,  710 

Bodleian  463,  pp.  652,  665 

Bodleian  2060,  p.  758 

Bologna  952,  p.  52 

Bologna    University   Library   378, 

p.  610 
Bruce  Papyrus,  p.  378 
Brussels    (Library    of    Dukes    of 

Burgundy)   1782,  p.  484 
Brussels  2784,  p.  657 
Brussels  8890,  p.  776 
Brussels  10074,  P-  498 
Brussels  15489,  p.  758 

Cambrai  195,  p.  696 
Cambrai  229,   p.   696 
Cambrai  829,  p.   696 
Cambrai  861,  p.   696 
Cambrai  907,   p.   758 
Cambrai  914,  p.   758 
Cambrai  925,   p.   633 
Canon.  Misc.  370,  p.  643 
Canon.  Misc.  517,  p.  682 
Casin.  97,  p.  577 
Chalons-sur-Marne  7,  p.  69S 
Chartres  63,  p.  484 
Chartres  113,  p.  692 
Chartres  342,  p.   577 
CLM  27,  p.  665 
CLM  51,  p.  650 
CLM  59,  p.  66s 
CLM  161,  pp.  749-50 
CLM  168,  p.  750 
CLM  187,  p.  750 
CLM  215,  p.  560 
CLM  270,  p.  750 
CLM  227,  P-  610 
CLM  344,  p.  2,77 
CLM  392,  p.  648 
CLM  489,  p.  648 
CLM  527,  p.  716 
CLM  560,  pp.  559,  698,  710 


INDEX  OF  MANUSCRIPTS 


833 


CLM  588,  p.  664 

CLM  621,  p.  241 

CLM  826,  p.  651 

CLM  1487,  p.  650 

CLM  1503,  p.  650 

CLM  2549,  p.  484 

CLM  3728,  p.  484 

CLM  6258,  p.  484 

CLM  6382,  pp.  678,  680 

CLM  9921,  p.  678 

CLM  11319,  p.  556 

CLM  13034,  p.  749 

CLM  13079,  P-  484 

CLM  14399,  P-  484 

CLM  14583,  p.  106 

CLM  14836,  p.  701 

CLM  18158,  p.  634 

CLM  18621,  p.  477 

CLM  18629,  pp.  674,  693,  696 

CLM  18764,  p.  674 

CLM  19417,  p.  500 

CLM  19544,  p.  477 

CLM  19648,  p.  498 

CLM  21557,  p.  634 

CLM  21627,  p.  477 

CLM  22307,  p.  692 

CLM  23390,  p.  696 

CLM  23479,  p.  775 

CLM  23535,  p.  571 

CLM  23787,  p.  498 

CLM  23839,  p.  477 

CLM  24571,  p.  477 

CLM  25073,  p.  477 

CLM  26688,  p.  477 

Corpus  Christi  82,  p.  555 

Corpus  Christi  114,  p.  657 

Corpus  Christi  134,  p.  476 

Corpus  Christi  154,  p.  657 

Corpus  Christi  189,  p.  578 

Corpus  Christi  2^2,  p.  652 

Corpus  Christi  254,  p.  648 

Cortona  no,  p.   164 

Cotton  Appendix  VI,  pp.  643,  646 

Cotton  Caligula  A,  XV,  pp.  680, 

695 
Cotton  Galba  E,  VTII,  p.  477 
Cotton  Nero  D,  VIII,  p.  556 
Cotton  Tiberius     A,     III,     chap. 

xxix 
'Cotton  Tiberius  C,  VI,  p.  692 
Cotton  Titus     D,     XXVI,     chap. 

Cotton  Titus  D,  XXVII,  p.  681 
Cotton  Vespasian  B,  X,  p.  601 
Cotton  Vitellius  A,  XII,  p.  695 
Cotton  Vitellius    C,    III,    pp.    597, 

612 
Cotton  Vitellius  C,  VIII,  p.  695 
CUL  213,  p.  602 


CUL  768,   p.   775 

CUL  1338,  p.  678 

CUL  1429,  p.  558 

CUL  1687,  p.  679 

CUL  1767,  pp.  no,  663 

CUL  Ii-i-13,   p.   652 

CU  Clare  15,  p.  647 

CU  Corpus   193,  p.  484 

CU  Jesus  44,  p.  610 

CU  Trinity  884,  p.  498 

CU  Trinity  906,  p.  748 

CU  Trinity  936,  p.  643 

CU  Trinity  945,  p.  695 

CU  Trinity  987,  p.  680 

CU  Trinity  1041,  pp.  401,  557 

CU  Trinity  1044,  P-  724 

CU  Trinity  1064,  p.  749 

CU  Trinity  1109,  pp.  678,  693 

CU  Trinity  1152,  pp.  597,  599 

CU  Trinity  1365,  p.  753 

CU  Trinity  1369,     pp.     686,     692^ 

695 
CU  Trinity  1446,  p.  564 

Digby  30,  p.  428 
Digby,  40,  p.  646 
Digby  43,  p.  600 
Digby  51,  p.  no 
Digby  58,  p.  693 
Digby  6z,  pp.  686,  695 
Digby  67,  pp.  340,  647 
Digby  68,  pp.  647,  652 
Digby  79,  P-  578 
Digby  83,  pp.  705-7 
Digby  86,  p.  678 
Digby  88,  p.  681 
Digby  91,  pp.  643,  646,  648 
Digby  92,  p.  647 
Digby  93,  p.  647 
Digby  147,  p.  647 
Digby  174,  pp.  701-2 
Digby  176,  p.  647 
Digby  183,  pp.  643,  646 
Digby  194,  pp.  652,  665 
Dijon  448,  p.  69s 
Dijon  1045,  p.  650 

Edwin  Smith  Papyrus,  p.  12 
Egerton  821,  pp.  677-81,  684,  726-9 
Egerton  823,  p.  699 
Escorial  Q-I-4,  PP-  52-3 
Escorial  R-I-5,  pp.  52-3 
Escorial  &-II-9,  p.  745 
Eton  133,  Bl.4.6,  p.  556 
Eton  134,  Bl.4.7,  p.  52 
Exon.  23,  p.  658 

Florence  II,  iii,  214,  pp.  653,  665 


834 


INDEX  OF  MANUSCRIPTS 


Gonville  and  Caius  109,  p.  658 
Gonville  and  Caius  345,  p.  599 
Gonville  and  Caius  400,  p.  577 
Gonville  and  Caius  411,  p.  742 
Grenoble  208,  p.  506 
Grenoble  258,  p.  484 
Gubbio  25,  p.  499 

Harleian  i,  p.  650 
Harleian  13,  pp.  643,  663 
Harleian  80,  pp.  340,  665 
Harleian  527,  p.  557 
Harleian  1585,  pp.  597,  609,  696 
Harleian  1612,  p.  340 
Harleian  1735,  p.  684 
Harleian  2258,  p.  677 
Harleian  3017,  pp.  677,  680,  695 
Harleian  3099,  p.  623 
Harleian  3271,  p.  695 
Harleian  3647,  pp.  663,  665 
Harleian  3859,  p.  601 
Harleian  3969,  p.  241 
Harleian  4346,  p.  612 
Harleian  4986,  pp.  597,  608 
Harleian  5294,  p.  609 
Harleian  531 1,  p.  694 
Hatton  76,  p.  776 
Hunterian  44,  p.  667 

Ivrea  3,  p.  634 
Ivrea  6,  p.  634 
Ivrea  19,  p.  692 

Laon  407,  p.  692 
Laud.  Misc.  247,  pp.  498,  556 
Laud.  Misc.  567,  pp.  749,  751 
Laud.  Misc.  594,  pp.  650-1 
Laud.  Misc.  658,  pp.  444,  477 
Laurentianus  xxxviii,  24,  p.  683 
Laurentianus  Plut.  68,  2,  p.  241 
Lincoln  College  34,  p.  351 
Lucca  1,  L,  p.  764 
Lucca  236,  pp.  597,  69s 
Lyons  328,  p.  664 

Madrid  10016,  p.  693 
Magliabech.  IV,  63,  p.  499 
Magliabech.  XI,  117,  p.  663 
Magliabech.  XX,  20,  p.  665 
Le  Mans  15,  p.  484 
Le  Mans  263,  p.  52 
Merton  219,  p.  125 
Monte  Cassino  97,  p.  577 
Montpellier  277,  pp.  600,  611,  776 
Munich,  Latin  MSS.,  see  CLM 

New    College    MS.,    unnumbered, 

P-  52 
Novara  40,  p.  484 


Orleans  35,  p.  484 
Orleans  192,  p.  484 
Orleans  276,  p.  692 
Ottobon.  443,  p.  401 

Palat.  Lat.  487,  p.  673 
Pembroke  278,  p.  676 
Perugia  736,  p.  598 

Rawlinson  C-117,  p.  643 
Ravi^linson  C-328,  pp.  597,  600,  746 
Riccard.  119,  p.  670 
Riccard.  1228,  p.  776 
Royal  2-C-XII,  p.  498 
Royal  4-A-XIII,  p.  65 
Royal  12-B-XVI,  p.  577 
Royal  12-C-IV,  pp.  554,  556 
Royal  12-C-XVIII,    pp.    267,    340, 

664 
Royal  12-E-XX,  p.  577 
Royal  12-F-X,  p.  65 
Royal  13-A-I,  pp.  554-5,  564-5 
Royal  15-B-II,  p.  601 
Royal  15-B-IX,  p.  701 
Royal  15-C-IV,  p.  601 
Royal  15-C-VL  pp.  554,  556 
Royal  17-A-I,  p.  705 

St.   Augustine's   Canterbury   1166, 

p.  643 
St.   Augustine's    Canterbury    1172, 

p.  714 
St.   Gall  751,  p.  596 
Ste.  Genevieve  2240,  p.  643 
St.  John's  17,  p.  680 
St.  John's  85,  p.  747 
St.  John's  128,  p.  349 
S.  Marco  179,  p.  658 
S.  Marco  XI,  102,  p.  665 
S.  Marco  XI,  in,  p.  694 
S.  Marco  XIV,  7,  p.  164 
S.  Marco  XIV,  26,  p.  164 
Savile  15,  p.  652 
Schlestadt  MS.,  pp.  765,  769 
Selden  3467,  p.  643 
Selden  supra  76,  p.  643 
Semur  10,  p.  484 
Sloane  475,  chap,  xxix,  pp.  723-6 
Sloane  1305,  p.  665 
Sloane  1571,  p.   599 
Sloane  1619,  p.  556 
Sloane  1734,  p.  291 
Sloane  1975,  pp.  597,  609,  696 
Sloane  2030,  p.  652 
Sloane  2454,  p.  657 
Sloane,  2461,  pp.  681,  696 
Sloane  2472,  p.  716 
Sloane  2839,  pp.  723-4 
Sloane  3554,  p.  716 


INDEX  OF  MANUSCRIPTS 


835 


Sloane  3821,  p.  340 
Sloane  3826,  p.  267 
Sloane  3846,  p.  665 
Sloane  3847,  pp.  340,  665 
Sloane  3S48,  pp.  267,  611 
Sloane  3857,  p.  716 
Sloane  3883,  p.  665 
Soissons  121,  p.  484 

Tanner  192,  p.  663 
Turin  K-IV-3,  p.  609 

University  College  2>Z^  p.  477 
University  College,  89,  p.  750 

Vatican  180  to  185,  p.  349 

Vatican  269  to  27^,,  p.  484 

Vatican  642,  p.  693 

Vatican  644,  pp.  693,  695 

Vatican  645,    p.   674 

Vatican  Palat.  Lat.  176,  p.  692 

Vatican    Palat.     Lat.    235,     chap. 

xxix 
Vatican     Palat.     Lat.    485,     chap. 

xxix 
Vatican  Palat.  Lat.  859,  p.  477 
Vatican  Urb.  Lat.  290,  p.  693 


Vendome  109,  pp.  577-8 
Vendome  122,  p.  484 
Vendome  129,  p.  484 
Vendome  172,  p.  577 
Vendome  175,  p.  577 
Vienna  303,  p.  499 
Vienna  2245,  p.  679 
Vienna  2272,  p.  604 
Vienna  2378,  p.  665 
Vienna  2385,  p.  647 
Vienna  2436,  pp.  647,  650 
Vienna  251 1,  p.  499 
Vienna  2532,  pp.  615,  681,  693 
Vienna  3124,  p.  267 
Vienna  3207,  p.  613 
Vienna  3255,  p.  332 
Vienna  5203,  p.  663 
Vienna  5216,  p.  340 
Vienna  5371,  p.  609 
Vienna  10583,  p.  651 
Vind.  Med.  29,  p.  499 

Westcar  Papyrus,  p.  8 
Wolfenbiittel  2725,  p.  340 
Wolfenbiittel  2885,  p.  668 
Wolfenbiittel  3266,  p.  477 
Wolfenbiittel  4435,  p.  498 
Wolfenbiittel  palimpsest,  p.  122 


DATE  DUE 

HAYO 

3  'iSS5     . 

Demco,  Inc.  38-293 


Q125.T52vl 


Q125 
T52 

v.l 


Thorndlke»  Lynn »  1882- 

A  history  of  magic  and  experimentai 
science*  New  York,  Macmillany  1923-58. 

8  V*  23  cm* 


444577 


Q125.T52vl 


3  9358  00444577  8 


'■;,■:''■  ;^K^