Skip to main content

Full text of "Hon. Daniel Barnard: a memorial address by Hon. Henry Robinson .."

See other formats


HON.  DANIEL  BARNARD 


A    MKMOUIAL    ADOKESS    BY 


HON.  HENRY  ROBINSON, 


OF  CONCORD,  N.  H. 


DELIVEKEl)    BEFORE 


THE    GRAFTON   AND   COOS    BAR  ASSOCIATION, 


.Jam  AHY  29,   1^92. 


I'KINTKIJ  A  1    <  t)H<)8  8TKAM  I'KESS,  WfiODSVILLE,  N.  II. 


i 


^ 


>^S'^'^:> 


ci^i?^?^ 


^.a^^    \ 


HON.  DANIEL  BARNARD 


A    MKMOKl.U,    ADDUKSS    liV 


HON.  HENRY  ROBINSON, 


OF  CONCORD,  N.  H. 


DKF.IVKHED     HKFOKK    THE 


GRAFTON  AND  COOS  BAR  ASSOCIATION 


Jaxuahy  20,  1802. 


PRINTED  AT  C'OllOS  STKAM  I'KK.SS,  MiJOUSVILLE,  N.  H. 


HON.   DANIEL    BARNARD, 

A    MEMOUIAL    ADDliESS,     HV 

HON.    HENRY    ROBINSON,    OF   CONCORD. 


Mr.  President,  (ukI  QpntleniPii  of  the  (ivafton  and  Coos 
Bar  Association : — 

There  is  no  defenre  when  Deatli  is  elaiinant.  Then,  no 
demurrer  prevails,  no  bill  of  exceptions  is  allowed,  no  points 
remain  upon  which  to  move  for  a  review.  All  objections  are 
overruled.  The  judgment  is  absolute,  irrevocable.  When 
the  final  process-server  appears,  even  sheriffs  succumb,  and 
trial  lawyers  who  have  seemed  almost  invincible,  vield  orra- 
ciously  as  a  helpless  child  to  the  universal  judgment  against 
humankind,  a  judgment  that  cannot  be  vacated  or  avoided,  a 
judgment  the  execution  of  which  can  be  satisfied  only  with 
the  whole  debt  of  life.  Jurists  the  ablest,  and  counsellors 
whose  experience  is  the  longest,  whose  advice  is  the  best,  are 
utterly  powerless  to  meet  the  dread  emergency  of  such  a 
case. 

V  Not  many  years  ago  gathered  at  the  Merrimack  countv 
bar  a  group  of  very  superior  men.  It  was  pronounced  the 
ablest  and  best  association  of  lawyers  in  the  State,  and  was 
unexcelled  anywhere  in  New  England. 

Ira  Perley,  that  great  genius  of  legal  acumen,  was  there. 
He  was  one  of  the  brightest  intellects  of  his  day.  Henry 
A.  Bellows,  generous-hearted  as  he  was  learned,  with  a 
beautiful  character  that  lit  his  face  as  with  sunshine,  was 
counted  in  its  remarkable  membership.      He  could  have  been 


— 4— 

as  eminent  in  the  })ulpit  as  he  was  at  the  bar,  and  his  life  as 
a  lawyer,  a  judge,  and  a  ehief-justice  was  as  pure  and  noble 
as  it  could  possibly  have  been  in  the  most  exalted  ministry. 
Josiah  JVIinot,  keen,  deep,  retiring,  but  ready  with  resources, 
and  girded  with  the  faculty  of  success,  made  one  of  that 
illustrious  circle.  Jonathan  E.  Sargent,  ripe  with  experience 
at  tiie  bar  and  on  the  bench,  with  a  mind  stored  with  legal 
lore,  was  one  of  the  central  figures.  Asa  Fowler,  a  compre- 
hensive scholar,  an  apt  technical  draughtsman,  and  an  erudite 
counsellor,  also  stood  in  the  fore-front  of  his  profession.  The 
venerable  George  W.  Nesmith,  wliose  integrity  and  impartial- 
ity became  proverbial,  was  one  of  the  gems  in  that  brilliant 
crown  of  manly  strength  and  possibility.  There  was  no  com- 
panion more  charming,  no  friend  more  hospitable,  no  attor- 
ney more  persistent,  no  citizen  of  social  instincts  with  more 
sparkling  and  infatuating  conversational  powers  than  Anson 
8.  Marshall.  Grand  old  Mason  W.  Tappan  was  there, 
rough  and  yet  susceptible  as  a  child,  deep  read  in  literature, 
and  with  a  wonderful  knowledge  of  human  natiu'e  ;  he  was 
an  earnest  advocate,  one  of  the  most  effective  that  ever 
graced  the  state.  Perhaps  the  most  active  and  indomitable 
element  in  that  magnificent  assembly  was  John  H.  George, 
who  made  his  client's  cause  his  own,  and  characterized  every 
imdertaking  with  the  force,  energy  and  unflinching  courage 
of  his  own  imperious  nature.  Noble  John  Y.  Mugridge 
was  there,  public-spirited,  buoyant,  the  especial  champion  of 
younger  men,  one  of  the  best  all-round  lawyers  that  ever 
entered  a  court-room.  Austin  F,  Pike  sat  with  the  others, 
deep  thinker,  skillful  lawyer,  general  student,  and  a  wide 
reader,  and,  besides,  there  was  Charles  P.  Sanborn,  with  his 
clear,  calm,  logical  mind,  his  easy,  popular  manner  ;  A.  F.  L. 
Norris,  persevering,  industrious,  a  pioneer  in  judicial  knowl- 
edge,  a  veteran  in  forensic  experience,  whose  goodly  fame 


— 5— 

only  lialf  equalled  his  merits  ;  William  T.  Norris,  painstak- 
inpr,  careful,  sincere,  and  beloved  ;  Charles  C.  Lund,  versa- 
tile, scientific  and  valuable  in  diiferent  branches  of  useful- 
ness ;  John  M.  Shirley,  with  a  memory  re|)lete  with  prece- 
detit,  a  cultured  taste,  and  a  piipinut  wit  and  sparklinf;  orij^- 
inality  which  made  him  a  potent  force  in  athiirs  ;  Hamilton  E. 
Perkins,  genial,  polite,  with  a  i)repo8se8sing  suavity  of  speech, 
and  an  equanimity  of  teuq)er  that  won  him  friends  every- 
where ;  William  ^^^  Flanders,  in  whom  the  elements  were 
gently  mixed,  honest,  faithful,  tolerant,  diligent;  Nehemiah 
Butler,  the  embodiment  of  stability,  prudence  and  faithful 
adherence  to  duty;  Aaron  Whittemore,  Jr.,  voung,  hand- 
some, held  in  uncommon  esteem,  and  with  everv  element 
favorable  to  the  best  success ;  Arthur  Fletcher,  with  fine 
business  qualifications,  splendid  mental  force,  and  wonder- 
ful tenacity  of  purpose  ;  Warren  Clark,  amiable,  trustvvorthv, 
upright,  whose  crown  of  glory  was  the  eminent  good  sense 
that  pervaded  his  whole  career. 

We  buried  another,  Willinm  M.  I^arnard,  a  beautiful 
young  man,  whom  we  all  loved.  Early  in  life  he  showed 
an  es|)ecial  ada])tation  to  the  legal  profession,  but  hardly  had 
he  entered  ujion  a  practice  of  surprising  success  and  promise 
when  he  wiis  called  l)ehind  the  veil  of  mystery.  As  we  paid 
tribute  to  him  in  the  court-room,  his  father  walked  backward 
and  forward  in  front  of  the  building,  unable  to  bear  the 
tender  allusions  to  his  partner  in  business,  his  own  son, 
whom  he  love<l  so  fondly,  and  in  whom  were  clustered  such 
fond  h')j)es.  And  now  that  indulgent  father  himself  who 
sacrificed  so  much  and  strove  so  hard  to  bring  up  aright  and 
educate  his  children,  unshrinking  has  passed,  as  Ingers(»ll 
said  of  Conkling,  "beyond  our  horizon,  bevond  the  twi- 
light's jjurple  hills,  beyond  the  reach  of  human  harm  or  help. 


—6— 

to  that  vast  realm  of  silence  or  joy,  where  the  innumerable 
dwell." 

These  departed  lawyers  were  the  Websters,  the  SuUivans, 
the  Bells,  the  Woodburys,  the  Jeremiah  Smiths,  the  Icha- 
bod  Bartletts  of  our  day  and  generation,  and  worthy  suc- 
cessors they  were  indeed  of  those  illustrious  founders  of  our 
jurisprudence.  They  were  roundly  equipped  in  intellectual 
attainment ;  they  were  beacons  in  our  social  fabric,  promo- 
ters of  reform,  friends  of  education,  framers  of  legislation, 
encouragers  of  industrial  enterprise,  leaders  in  politics,  busy 
men  of  affairs,  mainstays  of  the  community,  important  fac- 
tors in  the  world's  progress,  but,  one  by  one  (I  have  not 
named  them  in  the  order  of  their  departure)  they  receded 
from  our  sight  to  be  gathered  to  their  fathers,  to  become 
mere  clods  which  the  rude  swain  might  turn  with  his  share 
and  tread  upon,  or  wiser  than  kings.  Able  and  upright  in- 
deed should  be  those  who  wear  their  mantle  of  honor,  who 
have  donned  the  armor  of  their  responsibility. 

There  was  among  them  no  gentler  spirit,  no  clearer  intel- 
lect, no  lawyer  more  efficient  and  serviceable,  no  worker  more 
faithful,  no  man  more  loveable  than  Daniel  Barnard.  Let  us 
believe  that  he  has  awakened  "like  a  child  in  the  daylight's 
gleam."  Ilis  character  requires  no  glowing  setting  ;  he  was 
a  true  gem.  It  is  not  necessary  to  entwine  his  memory  with 
any  wreath  of  oratory  ;  there  is  eloquence  in  his  very  name. 
His  life  is  an  example  of  fidelity,  industry  and  usefulness. 
He  was  himself  a  sentiment  of  cheerfulness  wherever  he 
went,  of  geniality,  of  good-natiu-e,  of  hopefulness,  yet  his 
was  the  pathos  of  genuine  sympathy  ;  his  atmosphere  always 
that  of  kindliness  and  courage.  As  Phillips  Brooks  said  of 
Abraham  Lincoln,  "He  possessed  the  greatness  of  real 
iroodness,  and  the  ofoodness  of  real  greatness." 

Hie    career    needs    no    gilding    of    words,    the    principal 


_7_ 

eventt!  of  it  arc  fiuniliar  to  our  pco})lc.  We  stop  beside  his 
grave  to-day  only  to  express  deep  regret  at  his  death,  and  to 
})ay  a  tribute  in  simple  and  sincere  language  to  his  work  and 
worth,  a  tribute  that  conies  spontaneously  from  the  heart. 
Every  grief  tears  open  afresh  every  other  grief,  yet,  let  us 
not  mourn  for  the  dead,  but,  as  Charles  Sumner  bade  us,  re- 
joice in  their  lives  and  examples.  There  was  no  dross  in 
Daniel  Barnard's  character  ;  he  was  pure  gold.  He  left  us  too 
recently  to  be  weighed  yet  in  cold  thought ;  it  is  still  too  early 
to  analyze  his  merits  ;  but  in  the  affection  of  close  fellowship 
we  speak  of  him  as  we  feel  toward  him,  running  the  inno- 
cent risk  of  overpraise.  It  is  hard  to  believe  that  that  rest- 
less, energetic,  magnetic  force  that  we  called  and  knew  as 
Daniel  Barnard,  is  gradually  to  merge  itself  with  other 
forces,  and  in  time  cease  to  assert  its  individual  ])owcr. 
Lord  Lytton,  in  "Night  and  Morning,"  pronounced  it  a 
strange  thing  that  that  very  form  which  we  prized  so  chari- 
ly, for  which  we  prayed  the  winds  to  be  gentle,  which  we 
lapped  from  the  cold  in  our  ai'ms,  from  whose  footstep  we 
would  have  removed  a  stone,  should  be  suddenly  thrust  out 
of  sight !  And  this  same  composition  of  bone  and  muscle 
that  was  yesterday  so  strong, — which  men  resijccted  and 
women  loved,  and  children  clung  to, — to-day  so  lamentably 
powerless,  unable  to  defend  or  protect  those  who  lay  nearest 
to  its  heart !  A  breath  from  its  \i\)8  making  all  that  mighty 
difference  between  what  it  was  and  what  it  is. 

Daniel  Barnard  had  nothing  of  the  eccentricitv  of  genius. 
The  secret  of  his  success  was  work.  The  lesson  of  his  life 
was  diligence,  charity  and  consistency.  The  machinery  of 
his  make-up  was  held  in  even  motion  by  the  balance-wheel 
of  sound  principle  and  well-defined  convictions  of  duty. 
The  modest  estate  in  worldly  goods  that  he  left,  and  the  imi- 
versal  grief  that  overshadowed  the  whole  state  at  his  sudden 


— 8— 

death  are  tuuchmg  testimonials  to  his  honesty  and  self-sacri- 
fice. There  is  no  higher,  no  better,  no  grander  type  of 
manhood  on  earth  than  an  able,  cultured,  upright,  trust- 
worthy lawyer.  Such  was  Daniel  Barnai'd.  No  citizen  can 
be  80  helpful  and  comforting  to  his  fellow  citizens,  such  a 
solace  and  support  to  his  brother  men  in  trouble  as  a  clear- 
headed, calm-souled,  sympathetic  and  experienced  counsellor. 
Such  was  Daniel  Barnard. 

He  rounded  a  splendid  succession  as  attorney-general,  that 
comprises  the  names  of  Mason  W.  Tappan,  of  Lewis  W. 
Clark,  of  William  C.  Clarke,  of  the  Sullivaus,  of  John  S. 
Wells,  of  Samuel  Bell,  of  Jeremiah  Mason,  and  others,  a 
single  file  of  forensic  giants,  reaching  down  to  us,  men  pon- 
derous in  intellect,  replete  in  wisdom,  and  unswerving  in  rec- 
titude. 

Daniel  Barnard  in  his  last  official  position  especially  enti- 
tled himself  to  our  respect  and  regard.  The  duties  of  the 
office  are  important,  difficult  and  delicate.  They  call  for 
learning  and  ability,  })rudence  and  much  mildness  and  firm- 
ness. All  these  qualities  he  had.  There  was  in  him  no  sem- 
blance of  the  hardheartedness  of  an  unfeeling  public  prose- 
cutor. It  was  obvious  that  his  fidelity  to  the  state  and  his 
obligations  to  the  innocent  made  him  demand  punishment  for 
the  guilty.  He  was  sure  to  discover  all  the  weak  points  in 
the  case  of  a  respondent,  sure  to  bring  out  the  full  facts  a- 
gainst  him,  but  he  was  evidently  pleased  if  the  accused  could 
show  himself  innocent.  He  was  not  vain  of  convictions  ; 
he  took  no  pride  in  pursuing  wrong-doers,  except  as  far  as 
it  became  his  mission  and  duty.  Nobody  dared  to  offer  him 
a  bribe  ;  he  was  above  the  suggestion  of  corruption.  On 
his  hands  was  no  smell  of  pitch.  Insinuation,  that  foul 
bird  of  disparagement,  never  brooded  over  his  good  name. 
He  stood  erect  and  unsuspected  ;  his  honesty  was  never  ques- 


tloiu'd.  lie  was  never  a  persceutor,  and  as  a  public  pros- 
ecutor he  seeujcd  a  just  father  to  tlie  state  rather  than  a 
.tjovcrnuient  officer.  As  we  look  back  over  his  career  now, 
we  see  what  nice  discernment,  what  fine  discretion,  he  ex- 
ercised as  to  what  suits  should  be  brou<rht  and  what  should 
not.  We  see  with  what  sagacity  and  ability,  and  satisfac- 
tion to  the  people  and  credit  to  himself  he  conducted  the  re- 
sponsible duties  of  nn  office  that  requires  uncommon  qualifi- 
cations. AVe  begin  to  realize  the  magnitude  of  our  loss. 
In  the  language  of  Mr.  Webster  in  reference  to  Chief- 
Justice  Jay,  when  the  spotless  ermine  of  the  judicial  roljc 
fell  on  him  it  touched  nothing  less  spotless  than  itself. 

^Vc  reuiember  how  kind  he  was  to  young  men,  how  cour- 
teous and  polite  and  popular  he  was  to  everybody  on  every 
occasion  everywhere.  It  was  from  the  conflict  of  elements 
that  comes  forth  the  desirable,  and  I  have  sometimes  thought 
that  the  intellectual  battles  that  men  wage  at  the  bar  serve  to 
develop  their  best,  as  well  as  to  uncover  their  w^orst  qualities. 
Tliere  was  nothing  sinister  about  Daniel  Barnard.  1  do  not 
remember  ever  having  seen  him  lose  his  temper.  When  the 
most  important  cases  were  at  stake,  wdien  everything  seemed 
pivoted  as  it  were  upon  a  single  phase  of  a  trial,  he  never 
lost  his  self  control.  He  cherished  no  enmities.  lie  forirot 
when  he  forgave.  He  desfjised  meanness  and  hated  crimi- 
nality, but  he  pitied  weakness  and  never  ridiculed  ignorance. 
He  was  not  a  talebearer  of  others'  failings  and  prated  not 
of  their  misfortunes.  He  dealt  in  no  scandals.  He  never 
thought  to  build  himself  u[)  by  berating  others,  and  it  is 
very  deplorable  incleed  that  so  estimable  and  exemplary  a 
man  and  officer  has  left  us  forever.  He  was,  take  it  all  in 
all,  a  charming  gentleman.  He  died  as  he  had  wished  to  go, 
with  the  harness  on.  He  died  with  his  books  open  ;  he  died 
with  his   ])apcrs   ai'ouiid    him.      Suddenly  he   stepped   out   of 


—10— 

busy  life  where  he  vvus  a  most  iin[)ortant  factor,  and  left  un- 
finished and  unguarded  various  interests  that  had  learned  to 
look  up  to  him  as  invaluable  and  indispensable.  He  left  us 
before  any  of  his  faculties  had  begun  to  fail,  while  yet  he 
was  in  the  prime  and  glory  of  his  existence.  He  went 
with  characteristic  quickness  and  promptness,  without  any 
lingering  sickness.  Just  as  his  hair  was  silvered  over,  even 
before  the  noonday  splendor  of  his  capability  had  begun  to 
dim,  he  was  called  away.  "When  the  sun  fades  away  at 
nightfall  we  behold  the  harmonious  fulfillment  of  nature's 
law  ;  but  when  darkness  comes  at  noonday  we  are  struck  with 
awe  at  the  mysteries  of  the  universe.  When  eternity  beck- 
ons to  one  whose  labors  are  ended  here,  and  who  walks  wear- 
ily under  the  burden  of  years,  we  see  him  sink  down  to  his 
rest  with  resignation  to  the  decrees  as  they  are  written  ;  but 
when  death  claims  the  great  and  strong,  in  all  their  pride  of 
})ower  and  place,  we  break  forth  in  grief,  and  question  the 
ways  of  Heaven  and  earth,  which  are  past  finding  out." 

Charles  Sumner  said  when  the  martyred  Lincoln  died,  "In 
the  universe  of  God  there  are  no  accidents  ;  from  the  fall  of 
a  sparrow  to  the  fall  of  an  empire  or  the  sweep  of  a  planet, 
all  is  according  to  Divine  Providence  whose  laws  are  ever- 
lasting." 

The  air  has  been  thick  with  death  for  many  weeks. 

"His  flying  shafts 
Strike  down  to-day  the  bravest  in  the  land; 

And  here  and  there,  how  suddenly  he  wafts 
His  fatal  arrows.     Nor  can  long  withstand 
'I'he  mailed  warrior,  or  the  statesman  manned, 
Against  him.     But  why  should  he  hasten  on 

*        *        *  to  strike  one  down 

Just  in  the  zenith  of  his  strength  and  glory  of  renown?" 

But  we  are  told  that  death  cannot  long  lead  the  procession 
that  has  passed  oyer  the  silent  river,  for  the  tramp  of  innu- 


—11— 

mcrable  footsteps  echo  far  l)ov<)n(l  his  sphere.  "Tis  said  tliat 
he  knows  not  more  tlian  wo  their  distant  iioal.  lint  God 
who  made  tlieni  knows  and  will  not  leave  them  on  their  toil- 
some and  doubtful  march,  either  to  wander  in  infinite  nneer- 
tainty,  or  to  perisli  by  the  way. 

We  have  felt  with  Natiianiel  Hawthorne  that  it  is  very  sin- 
ocular  how  the  fact  of  a  man's  death  seems  often  to  give  people 
a  better  idea  of  his  character,  whether  for  i>'ood  or  evil,  than 
they  have  ever  possessed  while  he  was  living  and  acting 
among  them.  Death  is  so  Pennine  a  fact  that  it  excludes 
falsehood  or  [)ortrays  its  emptiness.  It  is  a  touchstone  that 
pi'oves  the  gold  and  dishonors  the  baser  metal. 

No  man  has  been  held  in  higher  respect  and  esteem  than 
Daniel  Barnard  by  his  fellow  men,  and  now  that  he  is  dead 
his  character  stands  out  in  bold  relief,  and  we  appreciate  and 
prize  his  excellence  as  we  never  did  before.  lie  was  not 
only  the  friend  of  his  professional  brcthi-en  and  of  other 
prominent  men,  but  of  the  conunon  pcoj)lc  ;  the  humblest 
and  the  poorest  counted  him  as  a  benefactor,  and  felt  glad  to 
press  his  hand  in  recognition  of  his  kindly  salutation  and 
sympathy,  and  many  were  the  noiseless  charities  that  he  dis- 
pensed. 

"God  give  us  men  ;  a  time  lilte  ttiis  demands 
Strong  minds,  great  hearts,  true  faitli,  and  reaciy  iiands; 
Men  whom  the  lust  of  office  does  not  liill ; 
Men  wliom  the  spoils  of  ollioe  cannot  buy  ; 
Men  who  have  honor;  men  who  will  not  lie; 
******  * 

Tall  men,  ^un  crowned,  wlio  live  above  the  fog 
In  public  dutj-  and  in  private  thinking." 

Daniel  Barnard  never  felt  himself  above  anybody,  lie  was 
not  to  be  flattered,  wheedled,  or  intimidated,  l)ut  he  was  pleased 
with  appreciation,  and  loved  to  meet  the  approxal  of  his  fel- 
low citizens.      There  was  nothing  of  pomp  or  vanity  about 


—12— 

him.  He  did  up  a  good,  clean  life's  work,  and  left  a  record 
that  is  the  best  encomium  that  could  be  pronounced.  He 
had  an  ingenius,  intuitive  mind.  It  had  been  trained  by  long 
experience  in  the  ramifications  of  a  broad  practice  that  cov- 
ered in  its  extensive  scope  almost  every  trade  and  profession, 
and  he  was  naturally  alert,  naturally  quick  of  discernment, 
with  not  a  particle  of  the  inertia  of  laziness  or  indisposition 
in  his  constitution.  He  was  well  informed;  fully  abreast  of 
the  times  on  all  subjects.  He  was  vivacious,  energetic,  un- 
tiring, and  yet  tolerant,  patient  and  uncomplaining.  He 
never  gave  up  until  the  end  came.  He  loved  fun  ;  saw  the 
ridiculous  side,  could  tell  a  good  story,  and  was  a  good  lis- 
tener. His  agreeable  personage  will  be  missed  at  the  rail- 
way stations  and  the  hotels  ;  his  welcome  face  will  be  seen 
no  more  on  the  cars  ;  he  will  be  missed  in  our  courts,  in  our 
social  gatherings,  at  our  political  conventions,  wherever  men 
meet  to  confer  and  do  congregate  for  legitimate  purposes  and 
to  cope  with  the  momentous  concerns  of  life,  there  Daniel 
Barnard  will  be  sorely  missed.  His  advice  was  alwaj's  good  ; 
he  saw  at  a  glance  the  pivotal  point  upon  which  a  question 
turned.  He  acquired  the  faculty  of  lucid  statement  and  co- 
gent argument.  Pie  gave  to  every  case  and  to  every  critical 
phase  of  it  his  best,  most  careful  consideration  and  research. 
His  fortunate  temperament  allowed  him  to  carry  on  his  mind 
a  great  burden  of  business,  public  and  private,  that  would 
have  overwhelmed  an  ordinary  attorney,  or  one  upon  whom 
it  came  suddenly.  There  seemed  to  be  before  him  many 
years  of  usefulness  and  progress,  years  of  comfort  and  enjoy- 
ment, but  in  the  lottery  of  death  there  are  no  blanks,  and 
suddenly,  unexpectedly  to  him  as  to  us  all,  he  solved  the 
greatest  problem  of  life.  His  virtues  were  worthy  of  emu- 
lation. He  iiad  great  sagacity  and  tact,  swift  perceptions, 
and  was  ready  to  decide  and  to  act.      As  Attorney-General, 


—1 3— 

he  hiul  IK)  pet  policy  to  enrry  out.  exee|tt  the  poliev  of  dis- 
cretion and  riofht.  A  friend  of  the  author  of  the  cniaiieipa- 
tion  proehunation  once  joked  him  ahout  tlie  |)rociirin2;  of  an 
ordinary  lawyer  to  ])reside  over  a  <r\-e:\t  nation  throu^ii  one 
of  the  most  terrihle  civil  rebellions  that  ever  arose,  Mr. 
Lincoln  replied  with  the  greatest  gravity:  "I  don't  believe 
any  great  man  with  a  policy  could  have  saved  the  country  ; 
if  I  have  contributed  to  that  end  it  has  been  because  I  have 
attended  to  the  duties  of  each  day  with  the  hope  that  when 
to-morrow  came  I  should  be  equal  to  its  duties  also."' 

Daniel  Barnard  had  to  do  Avith  the  organization  of  the 
Unitarian  church  in  Franklin,  and  remained  one  of  its  most 
earnest  and  generous  supporters.  He  was  modest  always  in 
his  own  oi)inions,  and  did  not  attempt  to  impress  his  relio-- 
ious  views  upon  others.  lie  believed  more  especially  in  im- 
proving, enriching  and  ennobling  life  and  character  here,  in 
making  men  worth  the  saving,  and  his  religion  was  the  prac- 
tical, working,  every-day  kind  that  men  can  carry  into  their 
business  and  pleasure, — introduce  into  their  homes,  their  of- 
fices and  stores  and  shops,  and  into  their  work,  their  politics, 
and  everywhere  else, — and  which  conduces  to  make  them 
better  and  nobler  and  happier. 

For  forty  years  he  lived  in  Franklin,  and  so  closely  was 
he  identified  and  allied  with  its  manufacturing,  its  banking, 
its  various  interests,  educational,  social,  moral,  political  and 
other,  that  when  he  died  it  seemed  as  though  the  keystone  of 
the  arch  was  gone,  and  certainly  a  central  pillar  of  the  town 
itself  had  fallen.  Forty  years  I  And  no  man  lives  to  say 
that  Daniel  Barnard  wronged  him,  and  no  man  lives  to 
say  that  he  ever  wittingly  did  injustice  to  anybody,  or  looked 
with  contempt  upon  the  humblest  of  God's  creatures.  (), 
young  men,  what  a  record  was  that  !  AVhat  a  encomium  on 
earth  I     What  a  passport  to  heaven. 


—14— 

He  was  born  sixty-five  years  ago  in  the  town  of  Orange. 
His  youth  was  spent  in  hard  work  on  a  not  over-productive 
farm  where  ojiportunities  for  education  were  very  meagre. 
From  the  outset  to  the  end  he  was  eminently  what  is  styled  a 
self-made  man.  He  worked  his  way,  paid  his  way,  earned 
and  deserved  the  victory  that  he  won  over  adverse  circum- 
stances. He  taught  district  school.  Young  and  inexperienced 
as  he  was,  such  was  the  trust  and  confidence  in  which  he  was 
held  in  that  little,  sparcely  settled  town  of  Orange,  that  he  was 
sent  four  times  to  represent  its  people  in  our  state  legislature, 
where  his  prepossessing  personality,  his  bright  insight  to 
men  and  things  was  recognized,  and,  unassuming  though  he 
was,  he  then  attained  a  high  position  in  public  trust,  respect 
and  admiration  that  he  never  lost,  and  the  luster  of  which 
was  never  tarnished.  He  committed  himself  to  that  party 
that  stood  for  the  freedom  of  the  soil,  and  later  for  the  free- 
dom of  the  slave.  In  1851  he  moved  to  Franklin,  and  en- 
tered the  law  office  of  Nesmith  &  Pike,  and  upon  his  ad- 
mission to  the  bar  became  a  partner  with  Mr.  Pike,  Judge 
Nesmith  retiring  from  the  firm,  leavino^  a  larofe  and  lucrative 
practice,  which  had  been  established  througli  remarkable  in- 
dustry and  aptitude.  Nine  years  later  Mr.  Barnard  with- 
drew from  the  partnership,  and  began  the  practice  of  the  law 
by  himself,  and  for  nearly  thirty  years  continued  in  business, 
overrun  with  clientage,  toiling  day  and  night  some  of  the 
time  to  meet  the  urgent  demands  of  a  most  exacting  profes- 
sion. After  his  son  AVilliam's  admission  to  the  bar  he  be- 
came a  partner  with  his  father,  a  business  arrangment  that 
was  very  agreeable  to  both,  and  promised  to  relieve  the  elder 
Barnard  of  much  responsibility,  but  the  sad  death  of  the  son 
intervened,  and  left  the  father  to  struggle  on  alone.  His 
practice  comprised  not  only  the  state  cases,  but  a  large  civil 
docket  in  Merrimack  county  and  important  causes  in  nearly 


—15— 

every  county  in  the  state,  ami  especially  in  Belknap,  Grafton 
and  Coos.  In  18(i0  and  18()2  he  represented  Franklin  in 
the  legislature,  and  was  subsequently,  in  1865  and  LSUfi, 
elected  to  the  state  senate,  presiding  over  that  body  in  the 
latter  year.  In  1870  and  1871,  lie  was  a  nicmber  of  the 
Governor's  council.  In  1872  he  was  a  delcijate  to  the  Ivc- 
j)ublican  National  convention  at  Philadelphia. 

He  was  solicitor  of  Merrimack  county  fi-oni  1<S67  until 
he  declined  the  position,  in  1872.  He  again  declined  the 
position  in  1877.  He  was  an  earnest  sup[)orter  of  the 
homestead-exemption  law,  in  1850.  He  introduced  the  reso- 
lution in  the  House  which  first  gave  the  members  a  daily 
news[)a[)er.  As  a  member  of  the  senate  he  took  an  interest 
in  the  amendment  of  the  Federal  Constitution  prohibiting 
slavery,  making  an  able  and  effective  argument  in  its  sup- 
port. He  was  appointed  Attorney-General  of  the  state  in 
1887,  which  position  he  held  with  great  honor  at  the  time  of 
his  death.  Any  position  that  Daniel  Barnard  might  have 
held  would  have  been  filled  efficiently  and  well,  and  to  pub- 
lic satisfaction.  His  appointment  to  the  Attorney-General- 
ship did  not  come  by  im})ortunity  and  solicitation,  but  by 
the  acclaim  of  the  whole  bar,  and  the  confirmation  of  j)opu- 
lar  sentiment.  In  1867,  Dartmouth  college  honored  herself 
in  honoring  him  with  the  degree  of  Master  of  Arts. 

His  life  is  worthy  of  a  volume.  1  cannot  crowd  a  satis- 
ftictory  sketch  of  it  into  the  half-hour  allotted  to  me.  He 
was  not  a  professional  philanthropist,  and  yet  we  counted  him 
one  of  the  guardians  of  the  Granite  state,  such  was  his  in- 
terest in  us  all  personally,  and  in  our  welfare  as  a  common- 
wealth, and  such  was  his  considerable  })art  in  the  history  of 
our  progress  during  the  last  half-century. 

Ho  died  on  the  thirty-sixth  anniversary  of  tiie  birth  of  his 
eldest  son,  and  at  the  same  hour  and  minute  of  the  day  that 


—16— 

his  son  (lied.  As  scholar,  statesman,  lawyer,  attorney-gen- 
eral he  had  to  do  with  great  concerns,  important  affairs, 
stirring  events,  public  tribunals,  but  it  was  as  husband  and 
father  that  he  appeared  to  the  most  attractive  advantage.  He 
shone  the  brightest  in  what  has  been  designated  "the  small 
sweet  courtesies  of  life."  No  man  ever  loved  and  was  beloved 
more  devotedly.  His  early  disadvantages  led  him  the  more 
to  ap})reciate  education,  and  he  made  great  sacrifices  that 
his  children  might  have  the  advantages  of  good  schooling.  His 
home  was  as  sunshiny  as  his  own  disposition.  Quoted  and 
honored  as  he  was,  it  was  in  the  family  circle  that  his  wit 
and  humor  sparkled  the  most,  it  was  at  the  hearthstone  that 
he  was  the  best  appreciated  ;  but  now  the  cloud  is  over  his 
house.  Yet,  if  death  is  sunrise,  then  it  is  morning  with 
him  ;  if  to  die  is  gain,  he  has  won  his  greatest  conquest. 

He  has  gone.  The  great,  bustling,  pulsating  world  will 
go  on  without  him.  Railway  and  other  corporations  will 
organize,  lease  and  contract  with  one  another ;  litigation  will 
arise  ;  legislatures  will  convene  ;  but  we  shall  see  him  no 
more.  Xo  more  will  he  be  anxious  for  others,  no  more  will 
he  bear  their  burdens  and  fight  their  battles.  Nothing  dis- 
tnrbs  him  now.  Men  will  strive  and  struffde,  reach  and 
fall  as  they  did  before,  but  all  must  share  his  fate.  Our 
paths,  however  widely  they  may  seem  to  diverge,  lead  only 
to  the  grave.  We  know  not  on  whose  cold,  dead,  pathetic 
face  we  may  next  be  called  to  look.  We  know  not  when 
our  own  hour  coineth,  but  the  lesson  of  his  life,  the  example 
of  his  success,  the  pleasure  of  having  had  his  acquaintance 
and  companionship,  the  sum  of  his  usefulness,  the  sweetness 
of  his  memory,  are  such  that  we  thank  God  for  having  giv- 
en us  Daniel  Barnard. 

"More  life,  more  life  I     Tis  this  we  crave. 
More  life,  more  life !     When  this  we  have — 
'Tis  this  that  we  call  death.'' 


LIBRftRY  OF  CONGRESS 


0  014  014  140  9