Skip to main content

Full text of "Illinois mineral industry in 1992 and review of preliminary mineral production data for 1993"

See other formats


IM112     m.GS: 
a. I 


UjuJI  SLuaai-^ 


ILLINOIS  MINERAL  INDUSTRY  IN  1992 

and  Review  of  Preliminary  Mineral  Production  Data  for  1993 


Irma  E.  Samson 


ILLINOIS  MINERALS  112 
1994 

Department  of  Energy  and  Natural  Resources 
ILLINOIS  STATE  GEOLOGICAL  SURVEY 


ILLINOIS  STATE  QEOLOQ'C^  S"^ 


3  3051  00006  0370 


LIBRARY. 


ILLINOIS  MINERAL  INDUSTRY  IN  1992 

and  Review  of  Preliminary  Mineral  Production  Data  for  1993 


Irma  E.  Samson 


ILLINOIS  MINERALS  112 
1994 

ILLINOIS  STATE  GEOLOGICAL  SURVEY 
Jonathan  H.  Goodwin,  Acting  Chief 

Natural  Resources  Building 
615  East  Peabody  Drive 
Champaign,  Illinois  61820-6964 


* 


& 


Printed  by  authority  of  the  State  of  Illinois/1994/450 

printed  with  soybean  ink  on  recycled  paper 


CONTENTS 

EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY  1 

MINERALS  EXTRACTED  3 

Fuels  3 

Coal  3 

Crude  Oil  7 

Natural  Gas  10 

Industrial  and  Construction  Materials  10 

Primary  Barite  10 

Clays  10 

Fluorspar  11 

Sand  and  Gravel  12 

Industrial  Sand  12 

Stone  14 

Tripoli  14 

Metals  15 

Zinc,  Lead,  Silver,  and  Copper  15 

Other  Minerals  16 

Peat  16 

Gemstones  16 

MINERALS  PROCESSED  16 

Ground  Barite  16 

Columbium  and  Tantalum  16 

Calcined  Gypsum  16 

Crude  Iodine  16 

Iron-Oxide  Pigments  16 

Natural  Gas  Liquids  17 

Expanded  Perlite  17 

Pig  Iron  and  Raw  Steel  17 

Slag  (Iron  and  Steel)  18 

Recovered  Elemental  Sulfur  18 

Exfoliated  Vermiculite  18 

Primary  and  Secondary  Slab  Zinc  18 

PRODUCTS  MANUFACTURED  FROM  MINERALS 

MINED  IN  AND  OUT  OF  STATE  1 8 

Cement  18 

Clay  Products  19 

Coke  1 9 

Glass  20 

Lime  20 

PREUMINARY  PRODUCTION  DATA:  1993  21 

Minerals  Extracted  21 

Fuels  21 

Industrial  and  Construction  Materials  21 

Metals  and  Other  Minerals  21 

Minerals  Processed  21 

Products  Manufactured  from  Minerals  22 


FIGURES 

1  Mineral  production  and  mineral-processing  plants  1 

2  Energy  used  in  Illinois,  1960-1992  3 

3  Coal  production  in  each  county  in  1992  4 

4  Trends  in  Illinois  coal  production,  1955-1992  5 

5  Trends  in  the  number  of  Illinois  coal  mines,  1955-1992  5 

6  Trends  in  the  productivity  of  Illinois  coal  mining,  1955-1992  7 

7  Coal  consumption  in  Illinois,  1968-1992  7 

8  Annual  crude  oil  production  in  Illinois,  1935-1992  8 

9  Crude  oil  production  in  each  county  in  1992  9 

10  Consumption  of  natural  gas  in  Illinois,  1955-1992  10 

11  Common  clay  production  in  Illinois,  1955-1992  11 

12  Districts  and  counties  producing  sand  and  gravel  in  1992  13 

13  Stone  production  compared  with  sand  and  gravel  production  in  Illinois,  1950-1992  14 

14  Districts  and  counties  producing  stone  in  1991  15 

15  Production  and  consumption  of  finished  portland  cement  in  Illinois,  1955-1992  19 

16  Consumption  of  quicklime  and  hydrated  lime  in  Illinois,  1955-1992  20 


TABLES 

1  Production  and  value  of  minerals  extracted,  processed,  and  manufactured 

into  products  in  Illinois,  1990-1992  23 

2  Illinois  mineral  production  compared  with  U.S.  mineral  production,  1991-1992  25 

3  Minerals  extracted,  processed,  and  manufactured  in  Illinois,  1992  (listed  by  county)        26 

4  Employment  and  wages  in  the  Illinois  mineral  industry,  1991-1992  28 

5  Minerals  consumed  in  Illinois  compared  with  U.S.  consumption,  1991-1992  28 

6  Fuels  and  energy  consumed  in  Illinois,  1991-1992  29 

7  Coal  production  in  Illinois  counties,  1991-1992  30 

8  Coal  production  in  Illinois  counties,  1833-1992  31 

9  Employment  and  production  by  method  of  coal  mining  in  Illinois,  1981-1992  32 

10  Coal  production  of  Illinois  companies,  1991-1992  33 

11  Coal  shipped  from  Illinois  to  other  states,  1988-1992  34 

12  Sources  of  coal  consumed  in  Illinois,  1988-1992  35 

13  Crude  oil  production  in  Illinois  counties,  1888-1992;  value  for  1991  and  1992  36 

14  Crude  oil  production  from  major  fields  in  Illinois,  1991-1992  37 

15  Petroleum  products  consumed  in  Illinois,  1988-1992  38 

16  Natural  gas  production  in  Illinois,  1985-1992  38 

17  Natural  gas  production  from  large  fields  in  Illinois  counties,  1990-1992  39 

18  Natural  gas  consumed  in  Illinois,  1991-1992  39 

19  Production  and  value  of  sand  and  gravel  in  districts  of  Illinois,  1992  40 

20  Illinois  sand  and  gravel  production  by  size  of  operation,  1990  and  1992  40 

21  Use  of  sand  and  gravel  produced  in  Illinois,  1990  and  1992  41 

22  Portland  cement  manufactured  in  Illinois,  1991-1992  42 

23  Mineral  production  data  for  1992  compared  with  preliminary  data  for  1993  42 

24  Illinois  coal  shipped  to  consumers  in  the  United  States,  1991-1993  43 

25  Total  coal  consumed  by  end-use  sectors  in  Illinois,  1991-1993  43 


EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY 

This  report  covers  three  types  of  mineral  industry  operations  in  Illinois  (fig.  1): 

•  extracting  minerals  from  the  ground 

•  processing  crude  minerals  (mined  primarily  out  of  state)  into  raw  industrial  materials 

•  manufacturing  mineral  products  such  as  coke,  lime,  and  cement  from  minerals  extracted 
and  processed  primarily,  but  not  exclusively,  in  Illinois. 

1992  Reported  Value 

The  total  reported  value  of  minerals  extracted,  processed,  and  manufactured  in  Illinois  during 
1992  was  $2,894.3  million,  0.5%  lower  than  the  1991  total.  The  total  of  the  values  reported  to 
the  U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines  (USBM)  is  not  necessarily  the  actual  value  because  many  producers 
do  not  report  their  production  figures.  Minerals  extracted  accounted  for  90%  of  the  reported 
value;  processed  crude  minerals  and  manufactured  minerals  accounted  for  the  remaining  10%. 
Coal  continued  to  lead  in  value,  followed  by  industrial  and  construction  materials  and  oil 
(table  1,  p.  23). 


PLANTS 

C  cement 

P  petroleum  refinery 

S  iron/steel 

M  miscellaneous 
mineral  processing 

COMMODITIES 

*  coal 
■  oil  and  gas 
A  limestone/dolomite 
<D  sand  and  gravel 
□  fluorspar,  metals,  barite 
A  clay 

*  peat 

*  tripoli 


Figure  1    Mineral  production  and  mineral-processing  plants. 


Illinois  produced  6%  of  the  tonnage  and  contributed  about  8%  of  the  value  of  coal  produced 
nationally.  The  state  continued  to  lead  the  nation  in  production  of  fluorspar,  industrial  sand,  and 
tripoli.  Production  of  stone  was  6.3%  and  sand  and  gravel,  4.2%  of  the  national  total  (table  2). 
Illinois  ranked  sixteenth  in  the  value  of  nonfuel  minerals  produced  in  the  United  States  in  1992. 

Extracted  Minerals 

In  1992,  the  value  of  commodities  mined  in  Illinois  was  $2,607.6  million,  a  decrease  of  4.4% 
from  the  1991  total.  Mineral  fuels  (coal,  crude  oil,  natural  gas)  accounted  for  78.2%  of  the  total; 
coal  alone  accounted  for  64%  of  the  total.  Industrial  and  construction  materials  such  as  clay, 
fluorspar,  sand  and  gravel,  stone,  and  tripoli  accounted  for  21.4%.  The  remaining  0.4%  was 
contributed  by  metals  such  as  lead,  zinc,  and  silver,  and  minerals  such  as  peat  and  gemstones. 

Mineral  extraction  was  reported  from  98  of  the102  counties  in  Illinois  (table  3,  fig.  1).  Only 
Cass,  Mercer,  Pope,  and  Stark  Counties  had  no  reported  mineral  extraction.  Perry,  Franklin  and 
Saline  Counties,  major  producers  of  coal  and  crude  oil,  accounted  for  more  than  one-quarter  of 
the  state's  total  value  of  minerals  produced:  1 1 .3%,  8.5%  and  8.2%,  respectively. 

Processed  Minerals 

Data  for  total  value  of  processed  minerals  in  1992  are  incomplete.The  total  includes  only  the 
figures  for  ground  barite,  expanded  perlite,  sulfur,  calcined  gypsum,  exfoliated  vermiculite,  iron- 
oxide  pigments,  and  slag.  Minerals  not  listed  (tables  1  and  3),  but  processed  in  the  state,  are 
natural  gas  liquids,  bismuth,  and  primary  and  secondary  slab  zinc. 

Manufactured  Mineral  Products 

Mineral  products  manufactured  in  Illinois,  primarily  from  minerals  mined  within  the  state,  include 
cement  (portland  and  masonry),  coke,  clay  products,  lime,  and  glass.  The  average  unit  value  of 
sales  of  portland  cement  increased  about  1.0%;  no  1992  data  are  available  for  masonry 
cement.  Lime  production  and  its  value  was  up  0.4%.  Clay  products  increased  3.9%  in  value. 
Data  are  no  longer  available  for  coke  or  glass. 

Employment 

The  Illinois  Department  of  Labor  reports  that  jobs  in  mining,  quarrying,  and  oil  and  gas  extrac- 
tion continued  to  trend  downward,  decreasing  9.9%  from  19,200  employees  in  1991  to  17,300 
in  1992.  Total  nonagricultural  employment  went  up  0.3%  from  5,220,100  employees  in  1991  to 
5,234,900  in  1992.  Employment  in  the  goods-producing  sector  decreased  4.7%  from  1,165,100 
employees  in  1991  to  1,133,500  in  1992,  and  in  the  service-producing  sector,  increased  1.1% 
from  4,055,100  employees  in  1991  to  4,101,400  in  1992  (table  4).  The  Illinois  Department  of 
Mines  and  Minerals  reported  in  the  Annual  Coal,  Oil  and  Gas  Report,  1992  that  employment  in 
the  Illinois  coal  industry  decreased  7.6%  from  9,667  in  1991  to  8,932  in  1992  (table  9). 

Mineral  Shipments 

Mineral  shipments  are  a  large  part  of  the  Illinois  transportation  industry.  Stone,  sand  and  gravel 
are  usually  shipped  by  truck  because  they  are  primarily  used  near  their  sources.  Coal  is  largely 
shipped  by  rail,  barge,  or  rail/barge  combination;  only  about  4%  of  the  coal  was  moved  to  mine- 
mouth  electricity-generating  plants  by  conveyor  belt.  Crude  oil  and  natural  gas  are  mainly  trans- 
ported by  pipeline.  Other  materials,  such  as  fluorspar  and  clay  products,  are  shipped  by  rail, 
truck,  and  barge.  Pig  iron  and  coke  are  generally  used  on-site  by  integrated  mills. 

Consumption 

In  1992,  the  value  of  the  state's  consumption  of  mineral  commodities  was  about  4.5%  to  5%  of 
the  nation's  total,  or  about  the  same  proportion  as  Illinois'  share  of  the  total  U.S.  population.  In 
physical  units,  Illinois'  mineral  consumption  varied  from  less  than  1%  of  the  U.S.  total  (for  resid- 
ual fuel  oil)  to  almost  15%  (for  zinc)  (table  5).  The  high  zinc  consumption  reflects  Illinois'  status 
as  a  major  manufacturing  state. 

The  state's  energy  consumption  was  estimated  to  be  3.3  quadrillion  Btu  in  1992  (4.1%  of 
the  U.S.  total),  1.5%  less  than  it  was  in  1991  (table  6).  Fossil  fuels  provided  76.4%  of  the 
state's  energy  needs:  26.2%  was  provided  by  oil  and  oil  products,  30.1%  by  natural  gas,  and 


total  consumption 


coal 


1960 


1965 


1970 


1975 


1980 


1985 


1990 


Figure  2   Energy  used  in  Illinois,  1960-1992. 

20.1%  by  coal  (fig.  2).  Nuclear  power  provided  the  other  23.6  %  of  Illinois  energy  needs, 
exceeding  the  amount  produced  by  coal  for  the  fourth  year.    Its  consumption  increased  in  1992 
to  787  trillion  Btu  from  772  trillion  in  1991. 

MINERALS  EXTRACTED 

Fuels 

Coal 

Production    In  1992,  Illinois  continued  to  rank  fifth  in  production,  behind  Wyoming,  West  Virgin- 
ia, Kentucky,  and  Pennsylvania.  Illinois  coal  production  increased  less  than  1%  from  60.0  mil- 
lion tons  in  1991  to  60.3  million  tons  in  I992  (table  7).  Total  value  was  $1,668.8  million,  based 
on  a  unit  value  of  $27.66  per  ton,  a  2.4%  decrease  in  per  ton  value  from  1991  (table  1). 

In  1992,  coal  was  produced  in  17  counties  (fig.  3),  as  compared  with  18  counties  in  1991. 
Douglas  County's  only  coal  mine,  Zeigler  Coal  Company's  Murdock  Mine,  closed  September 
1991.  Perry,  Franklin,  Saline,  and  Randolph  Counties  together  accounted  for  53.1%  of  the 
state's  production.  Perry  County  remained  the  top  producer,  contributing  17.6%  of  all  coal 
produced  in  the  state. 

Approximately  79%  of  the  state's  total  production  came  from  underground  and  21%  from 
surface  mines;  whereas  5  years  ago,  67%  came  from  underground  and  33%  from  surface 
mines  (fig.  4).  Production  from  surface  mines  has  been  declining  since  1980.  Approximately 
76%  of  Perry  County's  output  came  from  surface  mines — a  significant  percentage  that  repre- 
sented about  63%  of  the  state's  output  of  surface-mined  coal.  Franklin  County,  producing  solely 
from  underground  mines,  contributed  more  than  16%  of  the  total  underground  production.  In 
Saline  County,  about  93%  of  its  coal  was  produced  from  underground  mines — output  that 
contributed  more  than  15%  of  the  state's  total  underground  production.  More  than  87%  of 
Randolph  County's  coal  came  from  underground  mines  and  accounted  for  about  12%  of  the 
state's  total  underground  mined  production.  Other  counties  contributing  substantially  (more  than 
3  million  tons  each)  to  underground  coal  mine  production  were  Jefferson  (9.4%),  Macoupin 
(8.9%),  Gallatin  (6.5%),  and  Clinton  (6.5%)  (table  7). 

The  number  of  coal  mines  operating  in  Illinois  has  steadily  declined  since  the  early  1900s. 
There  were  920  mines  in  1900.  By  the  1950s,  approximately  200  mines  were  in  operation.  A 
further  rapid  decline  to  about  60  mines  had  occurred  by  1970.  In  the  latter  half  of  the  1970s, 
the  number  of  mines  increased  to  about  70  as  new  mines  opened  after  the  first  oil-price  shock 
of  1974.  Demand  for  coal  did  not  increase,  however,  and  the  number  of  mines  dropped  again. 


30  60  mi 


50  100  km 

Tons 

6,000,000  or  more 

4,000,000  -  5,999,999 

3,000,000  -  3,999,999 

2,000,000  -  2,999,999 

1,000,000  -  1,999,999 

<  1,000,000 

no  production  reported 


Figure  3  Coal  production  in  each  county  in  1992. 


By  1992,  39  mines  remained  in  operation:  27  underground  and  12  surface  mines  (fig.  5).  The 
number  of  surface  mines,  like  production  from  surface  mines,  has  been  steadily  declining.  In 
1988,  there  were  27  underground  mines  and  16  surface  mines. 

Since  1833,  Illinois  mines  have  produced  more  than  5.57  billion  tons  of  coal  (table  8).  Sur- 
face mines  operating  since  1911  account  for  1.32  billion  tons  or  23.7%  of  the  total  production. 
The  peak  year  for  surface  mining  was  1967  when  production  reached  37.2  million  tons,  where- 
as underground  mining  hit  a  high  in  1918  with  89.5  million  tons. 

The  average  output  per  underground  mine  reached  a  new  peak  of  1.76  million  tons  in  1992 
after  dropping  8%  in  1991.  The  average  surface-mine  output  increased  about  1%  in  1992; 
however,  output  per  mine  has  been  decreasing  after  reaching  a  high  of  1 .31  million  tons  in 
1989  (table  9). 

The  trend  in  Illinois  is  toward  fewer  but  larger  coal  companies.  Of  the  21  coal  mining  com- 
panies operating  in  Illinois  in  1992,  the  top  five  companies— Old  Ben  (Zeigler),  Peabody,  Con- 
solidation, Monterey,  and  AMAX — contributed  about  59%  of  the  state's  total  output  (table  10). 
For  comparison,  the  top  five  U.S.  companies  produced  26.1%  of  the  national  total  in  1992.  Pea- 
body,  Consolidation,  AMAX,  and  Old  Ben  (Zeigler)  are  four  of  the  top  five  U.S.  companies. 


70 


60- 


50- 


g    40 

o 

c 
o 


E     30- 


20- 


10 


total  coal  produced 


underground  mined 


1955 


1960 


1965 


1970 


1975 


1980 


1985 


1990 


Figure  4  Trends  in  Illinois  coal  production,  1955-1992. 


surface  mines 


1955 


1960 


1965 


1970 


1975 


1980 


1985 


1990 


Figure  5  Trends  in  the  number  of  Illinois  coal  mines,  1955-1992. 

Employment  and  wages    In  1992,  employment  in  Illinois  coal  mines  declined  7.6%  to  8,932 
employees  (table  9).  Employment  has  declined  about  51.3%  from  the  1981  level  of  18,148  coal 
mine  employees.  The  decrease  was  4.5%  in  underground  mines  and  21%  in  surface  mines. 

Mine  productivity    Productivity  is  measured  in  tons  per  shift  per  miner  and  calculated  by  multi- 
plying average  production  per  miner  per  hour  by  average  length  of  a  miner's  shift.  Unrounded 
data  are  used  in  calculating  the  changes  in  percentages.  The  labor  productivity  of  underground 
mining  operations  increased  12%  to  26.9  tons  per  shift  per  miner  in  1992 — a  17.3%  increase 


over  the  previous  high  of  22.9  tons  in  1969.  In  surface  mines,  labor  productivity  in  1992 
increased  5.5%  to  36.3  tons  per  shift  per  miner.  The  peak  year  was  1967  with  41.6  tons  (fig.  6). 
The  productivity  of  Illinois'  surface  coal  mines  continues  to  fall  farther  behind  the  U.S.  average. 

Prices    The  average  price  (f.o.b.  mine)  of  Illinois  coal  decreased  2.4%  to  $27.66  per  ton  in 
1992  (table  7).  Coal  mined  underground  in  Illinois  averaged  $27.93  per  ton,  down  3.9%  from 
the  1991  price,  and  surface-mined  coal  was  $26.69  per  ton,  up  0.4%  from  the  1991  price. 

Shipments  Illinois  coal  was  used  in  18  states  to  generate  electricity,  manufacture  coke,  and 
supply  energy  for  other  industries.  In  1992,  about  90%  of  Illinois  coal  was  sold  to  electric  utility 
plants,  about  1.0%  to  plants  manufacturing  metallurgical  coke,  and  7.7%  to  industrial  plants  and 
retail  dealers.  Illinois'  coal  exports  to  foreign  countries  dropped  to  1.25  million  tons  in  1992  from 
1.27  million  tons  in  1991  (table  11).  Shipments  to  electric  utilities  increased  slightly  from  52.5 
million  tons  in  1991  to  52.6  million  tons  in  1992.  Only  28.4%  of  shipments  went  to  utilities  in  the 
state.  Out-of-state  shipments  to  utilities  increased  4%;  29%  of  the  out-of-state  shipments  went 
to  Missouri,  28%  to  Georgia  and  Florida,  and  24%  to  Indiana.  All  Illinois  coal  used  for  making 
coke  was  used  in  coking  plants  in  northwestern  Indiana.  Of  the  Illinois  coal  used  for  other 
industrial  activities,  71%  was  consumed  in  the  state,  and  about  14%  was  shipped  to  Missouri, 
7%  to  Wisconsin,  3%  to  Indiana,  and  the  remaining  5%  to  other  states. 

Transportation  Coal  was  shipped  from  mines  to  the  consumer  by  rail,  barge,  and  truck.  Barge 
or  rail/barge  combination  has  been  gaining  importance  in  Illinois  as  transportation  costs  become 
an  important  aspect  of  price  competition.  Use  of  Illinois  coal  depends  primarily  on  out-of-state 
markets  and  transportation  costs  must  be  kept  low  to  compete  with  other  coals. 

Tonnage 


1990 


1991 


1992 


Rail5 

Local  trade  and  truck" 
Barge  or  rail/bargec 
Rail  lines 

Illinois  Central 

Union  Pacific 

Norfolk  Southern 

Chicago  &  North  Western 

Burlington  Northern 

Others 
Total  raild 


35,893,529 
10,814,982 
16,920,572 

17,108,784 
14,346,093 
6,084,152 
1,850,480 
2,200,114 
3,112,844 
44,702,467 


33,643,740 

8,724,763 

17,721,595 

21,554,145 
8,606,695 
5,859,135 
1,764,601 
2,467,688 
6,900,205 

47,152,469 


35,544,779 

6,244,205 

18,767,991 

21,479,345 
8,754,660 
6,042,372 
1,866,388 
4,430,867 
6,766,972 

49,340,604 


a   Part  of  the  rail  tonnage  is  shown  in  the  combined  rail/barge  category  and  some  was  shipped  from  inventory. 

b   Some  of  the  coal  was  sent  by  truck  to  barge. 

c   Some  of  the  coal  was  sent  from  mine  to  barge-loading  facility  by  conveyor  belt. 

d  Total  rail  includes  part  of  the  rail/barge  shipments. 

Source:  Illinois  Department  of  Mines  and  Minerals. 

Consumption   Illinois  ranked  seventh  in  coal  consumption  in  1992  after  being  fifth  in  1991.  Con- 
sumption decreased  5.6%  to  31.2  million  tons  in  1992  (table  12).  Coal  shipments  from  Illinois 
mines  to  Illinois  markets  have  declined  steadily  since  the  late  1960s.  In  1990  and  1991,  how- 
ever, consumption  increased  in  the  state;  then  in  1992,  consumption  declined  more  than  3%, 
back  to  the  1989  level.  As  figure  7  shows,  coal  imports  from  western  states  are  increasing, 
primarily  because  of  the  impact  of  the  Clean  Air  Act  on  markets  for  high-sulfur  coal.  In  1968, 
more  than  82%  of  all  coal  consumed  in  state  was  also  produced  in  state,  as  compared  with 
58%  of  coal  produced  and  consumed  in  Illinois  in  1992.  Total  coal  consumption  by  electric 
utilities  in  Illinois  has  fallen  each  year,  and  1992  was  no  exception  as  consumption  fell  5%. 
Declines  are  the  result  of  the  increasing  use  of  nuclear  energy.  Coking-coal  consumption 
increased  6.5%  in  1992;  however,  all  coal  used  came  from  out-of-state,  99%  from  Appalachian 
states  and  1%  from  western  states.  Industrial  consumption,  81%  of  it  in-state,  still  showed  a 
decrease  of  about  1 5%. 


60 


50 


Illinois 
United  States 


1 1 1 1 1 1 1 — 

1955    1960    1965     1970    1975    1980    1985    1990 


Figure  6  Trends  in  the  productivity  of  Illinois  coal  mining,  1955-1992. 


50 


10 


total  consumption 


Illinois  production 


1968   1970 


1975 


1980 


1985 


1990 


Figure  7  Coal  consumption  in  Illinois,  1968-1992. 

Crude  Oil 

Production  Crude  oil  production  in  Illinois  increased  0.4%  after  decreasing  37%  during  the 
previous  6  years.  Crude  oil  production  in  Illinois  supplied  only  about  9%  of  the  petroleum  prod- 
ucts needed  in  the  state  in  1992.  Other  states  and  foreign  countries  supplied  the  rest.  The  1992 
production  of  19.1  million  barrels  of  oil  had  a  value  of  $368.6  million,  with  an  average  unit  value 
of  $19.26  per  barrel.  This  represents  a  4.6%  decrease  in  per-barrel  value  from  that  1991  (table 
1).  Secondary  production  by  waterflooding  accounted  for  approximately  7.85  million  barrels  or 


150 

140 

130 

120 

110 

100 

90 

80 

70 

60 

50 

40 

30 

20 

10 

0 


\ 

V 

/total  crude  oil 
rY^V— - -\  /  production 

\^ 

\      secondary     \ 
V    recovery          \ 

J            primary 
/            recovery 

i           i            i 

i           i           i           i           i           i           i           I 

1935     1940    1945    1950    1955    1960    1965    1970    1975    1980    1985    1990 


Figure  8  Annual  crude  oil  production  in  Illinois,  1935-1992. 

about  41%  of  the  state's  total.  Pressure-maintenance  operations  produced  an  estimated 
995,000  barrels  or  5.2%  of  the  state's  total  (fig.  8).  About  3.44  billion  barrels  of  oil  has  been 
produced  in  Illinois  during  the  past  104  years  (table  13). 

Illinois  ranked  13th  of  31  oil-producing  states  in  1992.  Forty-six  counties  produced  crude 
oil  (fig.  9,  table  13).  The  following  five  counties  produced  more  than  1  million  barrels  each, 
contributing  about  46.5%  of  the  state's  total  oil  production. 


County 


1991 


1992 


County 


1991 


1992 


Lawrence 

13.4% 

13.0% 

Crawford 

11.0 

9.2 

White 

9.1 

8.5 

Wayne 

8.2% 

9.4% 

Marion 

6.3 

6.4 

Total 

48.0 

46.5 

An  oil  field  producing  more  than  200,000  barrels  per  year  is  considered  a  major  field  in  Illinois. 
In  1991  and  1992,  there  were  12  major  fields,  which  together  produced  55.7%  of  the  state's 
total  in  1992  (table  14).  The  two  largest  fields,  Lawrence  and  Clay  City  Consolidated,  each 
produced  2  million  barrels  or  more  during  1992  or  23.7%  of  the  state's  total.  In  1992,  there 
were  42  new  wells  with  reported  initial  production  of  100  or  more  barrels  of  oil  per  well  per  day. 
The  highest  initial  production  reported  during  the  year  was  816  barrels  of  oil  per  day  for  a  well 
located  in  a  field  in  White  County.  The  average  daily  per-well  production  in  Illinois  is  1.65 
barrels,  so  the  state  remains  highly  sensitive  to  oil  price  changes. 

Crude  oil  production  reached  a  peak  of  147.6  million  barrels  in  1940  (fig.  8).  From  that 
level,  oil  produced  by  primary  recovery  methods  declined  steadily  until  1973,  although  some 
years  showed  small  gains.  The  introduction  of  the  hydraulic  rock-fracturing  method  in  1954  and 
the  increased  use  of  waterflooding  stabilized  oil  production  at  about  78  million  barrels  per  year 
from  1955  to  1962.  Production  fell  steadily  after  1962  as  reserves  were  depleted.  In  1989, 
production  dropped  to  20.3  million  barrels,  the  lowest  since  1937  when  production  was  just  7.4 
million  barrels.  It  continued  to  drop  in  1990  to  20.0  million  barrels  and  in  1991  to  19.07  million 
barrels,  but  in  1992,  it  rose  to  19.14  million  barrels. 

By  December  1992,  proved  reserves  were  138  million  barrels,  a  7.8%  increase  from  that 
of  December  1991.  Current  reserves  are  80.3%  below  the  700  million  barrels  of  reserves  of 
January  1956,  the  post-World  War  II  peak. 


r^r-> 


30  60  mi 


0  50  100  km 

Barrels 


2,000,000  or  more 
1 ,000,000  -  1 ,999,999 
i  500,000  -  999,999 
J  200,000  -  499,999 
50,000  -  199,999 


no  production  reported 


Figure  9  Crude  oil  production  in  each  county  in  1992. 


Refineries  As  of  January  1993,  Illinois  had  seven  refineries  operating  in  Cook,  Crawford, 
Lawrence,  Madison,  and  Will  Counties.  Total  refining  capacity  was  965,600  barrels  of  oil  per 
day,  up  1.4%  from  January  1,  1992.  Illinois'  annual  refining  capacity  far  exceeds  its  total 
consumption  of  petroleum  products  and  makes  the  state  a  net  exporter  of  petroleum  products. 
Low  oil  prices,  although  detrimental  to  crude  oil  producers,  can  work  to  the  advantage  of  the 
refining  industry  and  the  state's  economy. 

Consumption  Reported  consumption  of  major  petroleum  products  in  Illinois  increased  2.6%  in 
1992  because  of  an  increase  in  motor  gasoline,  lubricants,  and  asphalt  and  road  oil.  The  use  of 
residual  fuel  oil,  liquified  gases,  and  kerosene  declined  (table  15). 


QJ 
<D 
*♦— 

o 

O 

c 
o 


electric  utilities  and  other 


residential 


1955 


1960  1965  1970  1975  1980  1985  1990 


Figure  10  Consumption  of  natural  gas  in  Illinois,  1955-1992. 

Natural  Gas 

Production  Natural  gas  is  not  produced  in  large  quantities  in  Illinois,  therefore  the  state  is 
almost  totally  dependent  on  other  sources  for  its  needs.  In  1992,  the  state's  reported  production 
of  natural  gas  decreased  26%  (table  16).  Although  production  has  been  slowly  declining  for 
several  years,  in  the  last  3  years  it  dropped  77%,  primarily  due  to  several  depleted  or  idled  gas 
fields  such  as  the  Pittsburg  field  in  Williamson  County.  There  was  no  production  in  Williamson 
County  in  1992,  although  it  was  the  top  producer  in  1991.  St.  Clair  County,  with  27%  of  the 
state's  total  output,  was  the  top  producer  in  1992.  Gallatin  County  with  24%  was  second  and 
Saline  County,  also  with  24%,  was  third  (table  17).  The  average  wellhead  value  of  Illinois  gas 
decreased  less  than  1%  from  $2.17  per  thousand  cubic  feet  (Mcf)  in  1991  to  $2.15  per  Mcf  in 
1992  (table  1). 

Consumption    Natural  gas  consumption  in  Illinois  began  to  decline  after  1971  and  reached  a 
recent  low  in  1987.  Since  then,  consumption  has  been  generally  rising  in  Illinois  (fig.  10). 
Reported  consumption  of  natural  gas  decreased  0.5%  in  1992  (table  18).  Although  the  largest 
percentage  of  decrease  (28%)  was  for  electric  utilities,  it  represented  only  a  small  volume  of 
gas.  Industrial  and  commercial  usage  increased  slightly  (0.2%  and  0.3%,  respectively).  There 
were  small  decreases  in  consumption  in  the  residential  (1.8%)  and  other  sectors  (6.8%). 

Industrial  and  Construction  Materials 
Primary  Barite 

An  accessory  mineral  in  fluorspar  ore,  barite,  is  recovered  as  a  byproduct  by  the  fluorspar 
industry  of  Hardin  County.  Ozark-Mahoning,  the  only  producer  in  Illinois,  continues  to  turn  out 
barite  at  its  Rosiclare  mill.  Because  of  the  small  scale  of  the  barite  operation,  the  increases 
shown  in  1992  were  94%  in  production  and  61%  in  value.  Barite  is  used  primarily  as  a 
weighting  agent  in  mud  systems  for  drilling  for  oil  and  gas.  Other  uses  include  the  manufacture 
of  paints,  rubber,  glass,  and  barium  chemicals. 

Clays 

Production    Shale,  absorbent  clay  (fuller's  earth),  and  common  clay  are  mined  in  Illinois.  A 
partly  consolidated  bedrock  clay  is  mined  in  southernmost  Illinois  to  produce  absorbent  clay 
products.  Fuller's  earth  is  also  an  absorbent  clay  or  clay-like  material  that  decolorizes  and  puri- 
fies. In  Illinois,  deposits  of  unconsolidated  surficial  clays  and  consolidated  bedrock  clays  and 


10 


2.6 


total  clay  production 


1955 


1960 


1965 


1970 


1975 


1980 


1985 


1990 


Figure  11    Common  clay  production  in  Illinois,  1955-1992. 


shales  are  mined  to  produce  common  clay.  Common  clay  is  defined  as  a  clay  or  clay-like 
material  that  is  sufficiently  plastic  to  permit  ready  molding.  The  USBM  reported  Illinois  clay 
production  (excluding  fuller's  earth)  increased  4.1%  from  566,741  tons  in  1991  to  590,047  tons 
in  1992  (fig.  11).  Nationally,  Illinois  ranked  15th  in  quantity  and  8th  in  the  value  of  total  clay 
production.  U.S.  production  of  common  clay  decreased  about  5%  from  27.2  million  in  1991  to 
25.9  million  in  1992.  The  total  of  all  clay  produced  in  the  United  States  decreased  15.5%. 
In  1992,  the  average  value  per  ton  of  common  clay  in  Illinois  declined  from  $4.31  to 
$4.00,  making  a  total  value  of  $2,362,467  for  the  year.  Production  of  common  clay  was 
reported  from  six  companies  in  four  counties.  Livingston  County  was  the  leading  producer  of 
common  clay;  La  Salle  County  was  second;  Bond  County  was  a  close  third;  and  Kankakee 
County,  fourth.  In  Pulaski  County,  only  one  company  (Golden  Cat  Corporation)  reported 
production  of  absorbent  clay  (fuller's  earth)  at  two  pits.  The  combined  total  of  the  two  pits' 
production  decreased  about  20%,  whereas  their  value  was  about  25%  less  in  1992. 

Uses    Common  clays  and  shales  mined  in  Illinois  are  used  to  manufacture  bricks,  drain  tiles, 
dinnerware,  and  cement.  Manufacturing  common  brick  used  about  85%  of  the  state's  common 
clay  production  in  1992;  portland  cement  took  14%;  and  drain  tile  required  the  remaining  1%. 
Absorbent  clay  is  used  in  cat  litter  and  oil-sweep  compounds,  as  a  filler  and  pelletizer  in  animal 
feeds,  and  for  steel  casting. 

Fluorspar 

Production  and  shipments    One  company  in  southern  Illinois  was  the  only  producer  of  fluorspar 
in  the  United  States.  Ozark-Mahoning  Company  operated  three  mines — the  Annabell  Lee,  Den- 
ton, and  No.  1  mines — and  a  flotation  plant  near  Rosiclare  in  Hardin  County.  The  company  also 
dried  imported  fluorspar  to  supplement  production.  Production  decreased  about  5%  from  1991 
to  1 992.  The  steady  decline  can  be  traced  to  the  decreasing  use  of  chlorofluorocarbons,  as  a 
response  to  concerns  about  the  environment,  and  to  cheaper  foreign  imports  (especially  those 
from  China).  The  United  States  depends  on  foreign  sources  for  most  of  its  fluorspar. 

Barite,  copper,  lead,  silver,  and  zinc  (sphalerite)  concentrates  were  recovered  as  coprod- 
ucts  of  fluorspar  processing  in  Illinois.  In  the  United  States,  about  60,000  tons  of  the  byproduct 
fluosilicic  acid  (FSA),  equivalent  to  105,600  tons  of  92%  fluorspar,  was  recovered.  FSA  was 
used  primarily  in  the  aluminum  industry  for  making  aluminum  fluoride  and  in  water  fluoridation, 
either  directly  or  after  processing  to  sodium  silicofluoride. 


11 


Consumption    Reported  U.S.  consumption  of  fluorspar  (acid  spar  and  metallurgical  spar)  fell  for 
the  fourth  year,  a  drop  of  about  44%  from  651,055  tons  in  1988  to  365,000  tons  in  1992.  More 
than  65%  of  the  reported  production  went  into  hydrofluoric  acid,  the  primary  ingredient  in  most 
organic  and  inorganic  fluorine-bearing  chemicals.  Hydrofluoric  acid  is  also  used  in  processing 
aluminum  and  uranium.  The  steel  industry  took  about  15%  of  the  fluorspar  produced,  using  it 
as  a  flux  and  in  iron  and  steel  foundries.  The  remainder  was  consumed  in  manufacturing  glass, 
welding-rod  coatings,  and  enamels,  and  for  fluoridating  water. 

The  apparent  U.S.  consumption  (production  +  imports  -  exports  ±  change  in  stocks) 
increased  9%  from  365,831  tons  in  1991  to  399,000  tons  in  1992.  Apparent  consumption  has 
gone  down  about  45%  since  1988.  The  discrepancy  between  apparent  and  reported  consump- 
tion is  often  large  for  many  minerals,  including  fluorspar,  because  users  are  more  numerous 
than  producers  or  traders,  and  not  all  users  report  consumption  to  the  USBM. 

Consumption  of  metallurgical-grade  fluorspar  by  the  steel  industry  is  decreasing  drasti- 
cally, partly  because  of  the  drop  in  steel  output,  but  mainly  because  of  continuing  improvements 
in  efficiency  and  more  rigid  raw  material  specifications.  These  modernizations  will  probably 
lower  consumption  of  fluorspar  for  several  years.  Further  decline  in  consumption  is  anticipated 
as  the  government  restricts  use  of  chlorofluorocarbons  in  an  effort  to  implement  the  Montreal 
Protocol  on  Substances  that  Deplete  the  Ozone  Layer. 

Sand  and  Gravel 

Since  1981,  the  USBM  has  surveyed  sand  and  gravel  producers  only  in  even-numbered  years. 
In  odd-numbered  years,  estimates  are  published.  In  1985,  the  USBM  began  compiling  sand 
and  gravel  production  by  district  rather  than  by  county  to  preserve  the  confidentiality  of  the  data 
(fig.  12).  Data  for  individual  counties  are  no  longer  available. 

Production    Sand  and  gravel  deposits  are  widely  distributed  in  Illinois.  Glacial  deposits,  chiefly 
valley  trains  and  outwash  plains,  are  the  primary  sources  of  construction  sand  and  gravel. 
Environmental  restrictions,  local  zoning  regulations,  and  land  development  continue  to  concern 
the  sand  and  gravel  industry.  New  operations  tend  to  locate  away  from  highly  populated  areas. 

Production  in  1992  was  35.7  million  tons,  about  36%  more  than  the  1991  estimated 
production.  The  USBM  has  not  revised  their  1991  estimate,  which  appears  to  be  much  too  low. 
The  combined  value  of  sand  and  gravel  was  $123.7  million  (table  19);  the  average  estimated 
unit  value  at  the  pit  was  $3.47  per  ton,  about  a  1%  increase  from  the  1991  estimate  (table  1). 
Illinois  ranked  seventh  of  the  50  states  in  production  of  sand  and  gravel  in  1992. 

Nine  counties  (McHenry,  Kane,  Lake,  Du  Page,  Cook,  Tazewell,  Grundy,  Woodford,  and 
Peoria),  each  producing  more  than  1  million  tons,  accounted  for  about  70%  of  the  sand  and 
gravel  production  in  Illinois.  The  concentration  of  about  two-thirds  of  Illinois'  population  in  Cook 
and  five  surrounding  metropolitan  counties  makes  a  ready  market  for  sand  and  gravel.  District  1 
produced  63%;  District  2,  11%;  District  3,  19%;  and  District  4,  7%.  In  1992,  113  companies 
operated  149  pits  in  54  counties  of  Illinois  (fig.  12).  About  38%  of  the  state's  production  came 
from  operations  of  1  million  tons  per  year  and  more,  as  compared  to  49%  in  1990  (table  20). 
As  shown  in  figure  13,  Illinois'  sand  and  gravel  production  has  grown  more  slowly  than  its  stone 
production  in  the  past  decade,  a  trend  indicating  a  preference  for  stone  in  the  construction 
industry. 

Transportation    Because  of  its  low  unit  price,  most  construction  sand  and  gravel  is  not  shipped 
farther  than  50  miles  from  the  pit,  although  operations  on  navigable  rivers  may  ship  material 
much  farther  by  barge.  About  three-quarters  of  the  material  was  shipped  by  truck  in  1992;  the 
remainder  was  shipped  by  barge  or  rail,  or  used  at  the  pit,  for  example,  in  asphalt  production. 

Consumption  and  uses    Production  reported  is  actually  material  sold  or  used;  stockpiled 
production  is  not  reported  until  it  is  sold  or  consumed.  Illinois  sand  and  gravel  is  primarily  used 
as  various  types  of  construction  aggregate  for  buildings  and  road  construction. 

Industrial  Sand 

Production    The  area  best  known  for  production  of  industrial  (silica)  sand  from  the  St.  Peter 
Sandstone  of  Middle  Ordovician  age  is  the  Ottawa  district  of  La  Salle  County.  Within  the  district, 
the  St.  Peter  is  called  the  Ottawa  Sand.  Illinois  again  ranked  first  of  37  states  in  industrial  sand 

12 


30  60  mi 


50  100  km 

county  producing  sand 
and  gravel 


industrial  sand  production 


Figure  12   Districts  and  counties  producing  sand  and  gravel  in  1992. 

production.  The  4.4  million  tons  (17%  of  the  U.S.  total)  produced  in  1992  was  a  6.4%  increase 
over  the  estimated  tonnage  for  1991.  The  total  value  decreased  about  1%  to  $56.7  million.  The 
average  unit  value  was  estimated  at  $12.87  per  ton,  a  decrease  from  the  estimated  $13.80  for 
1991.  Five  companies  operated  six  pits  in  La  Salle,  Mason,  and  Ogle  Counties. 

Transportation    Industrial  sand  was  shipped  mainly  by  rail  in  1992;  however,  a  significant 
amount  is  still  shipped  by  truck  and  a  small  amount  by  barge. 

Consumption  and  uses    Industrial  silica  sand  was  produced  in  both  ground  and  unground 
forms.  Unground  sand  is  used  primarily  in  glass  manufacturing.  Other  uses  include  sand  for 
molding,  blasting,  grinding  and  polishing,  railroad  traction,  filtration,  and  propping  (frac  sand)  for 
hydrofracturing  reservoir  rock  in  oil  wells.  Ground  sand  is  used  in  chemicals,  abrasives,  enam- 
els, pottery,  porcelain,  tile,  and  various  fillers. 

Unimin  Corporation,  U.S.  Silica  Company,  Manley  Brothers,  and  Fairmont  Minerals  Ltd. 
mined  silica  sand  in  the  Ottawa  district  of  La  Salle  County,  and  Unimin's  operation  in  Ogle 
County  mined  sand  for  glass,  blasting,  foundry,  and  frac  sand  markets.  Manito  Investment 


13 


1950    1955 


1960    1965    1970    1975    1980    1985 


1990 


Figure  13  Stone  production  compared  with  sand  and  gravel  production  in 
1950-1992. 


hnois, 


Company  mined  Quaternary-age  quartz-feldspar  dune  sand  in  Mason  County  for  foundry  sand 
and  the  amber-colored  giass  market. 

Stone 

Since  1981,  the  USBM  has  surveyed  stone  production  only  in  odd-numbered  years.  Estimated 
data  are  given  for  1992  and  actual  data  for  1991.  In  1985,  the  USBM  began  compiling  stone 
production  in  Illinois  by  district  (fig.  14).  Data  for  individual  counties  are  no  longer  available. 

Production    Limestone  and  dolomite  quarries  are  located  where  thick  stone  deposits  occur 
near  the  surface  because  of  upwarping  of  bedrock  and  erosion  of  overlying  materials. 

Crushed  stone  is  the  state's  most  important  rock  product.  In  1992,  Illinois  continued  to 
rank  second  in  production  of  crushed  stone  among  49  producing  states.  An  estimated  72.7 
million  tons  of  stone  was  produced  Illinois  in  1992,  a  6%  increase  from  68.6  million  tons 
produced  in  1991.  Total  value  was  estimated  at  $322.8  million,  a  9.3%  gain.  In  1991,  the  last 
year  for  which  actual  figures  are  available,  53  of  the  state's  102  counties  reported  production 
(fig.  14).  A  small  amount  of  dimension  stone  was  produced  by  one  producer  in  Kane  County. 

Shipments    Stone,  a  bulk  commodity,  is  used  primarily  near  the  quarry,  so  more  than  one-half 
of  the  stone  produced  was  transported  by  truck.  A  small  percentage  was  used  at  the  site  and 
the  remainder  went  by  rail  or  barge.  Waterways  were  put  to  use  by  some  producers  along  the 
Illinois,  Ohio,  and  Mississippi  Rivers.  Crushed  stone  was  barged  to  in-state  destinations  as  well 
as  to  Pennsylvania  and  Gulf  Coast  markets  in  Alabama,  Texas,  and  Louisiana.  The  Illinois 
Central  Railroad  uses  stone  produced  in  Illinois  for  ballast  throughout  its  entire  system. 

Consumption  and  uses    Stone  is  used  primarily  as  construction  aggregate  in  portland  cement, 
in  bituminous  highway  construction  as  road-base  stone,  and  in  manufacturing  portland  cement. 
It  also  has  chemical,  agricultural,  and  environmental  uses.  The  small  amount  of  dimension 
stone  mined  in  Illinois  is  used  as  veneer  for  houses,  small  retaining  walls,  rubble,  and  flagging. 

Tripoli 

Production    The  term  tripoli  refers  to  microcrystalline  silica.  Unimin  Specialty  Minerals  Inc.,  a 
division  of  Unimin  Corporation,  is  the  nation's  leading  producer  of  tripoli.  Located  in  Alexander 
County  in  southern  Illinois,  Unimin  is  the  only  producer  of  high-grade  tripoli  in  Illinois. 


14 


Figure  14  Districts  and  counties  producing  stone  in  1991. 

Tripoli  is  mined  in  only  four  states.  Illinois  has  remained  the  nation's  largest  producer  of 
tripoli  and  accounts  for  more  than  70%  of  the  total  U.S.  production  in  1992.  Tripoli  production 
figures  are  confidential. 

Consumption  and  uses    Tripoli  processed  in  Illinois  is  used  as  filler  in  paints,  plastics,  and 
rubber  products,  and  as  an  abrasive  in  buffing  and  polishing  compounds,  soap,  and  toothpaste. 
Some  iron-stained  tripoli  is  now  being  used  in  the  manufacture  of  portland  cement. 

Metals 

Zinc,  Lead,  Silver,  and  Copper 

Production    Minerals  bearing  zinc,  lead,  silver,  and  copper  are  recovered  from  fluorspar  ore 
mined  in  Hardin  County  by  Ozark-Mahoning  Company.  In  1992,  zinc  (sphalerite  concentrate) 
production  increased  about  9%  and  value  jumped  20%.  Small  amounts  of  lead,  copper,  and 
silver  were  reported  for  1992.  These  metals,  byproducts  of  the  fluorspar  industry,  have  been 
produced  in  relatively  small  quantities  and  only  add  a  small  amount  to  the  total  value  of  miner- 
als produced  in  the  state. 


15 


Other  Minerals 

Peat 

All  commercial  sales  of  peat  in  the  United  States  (excluding  imports)  are  for  agriculture  and 
horticulture.  Three  types  of  peat — reed  sedge,  moss,  and  peat  humus — were  produced  in  Illi- 
nois by  four  companies:  Dahl  Enterprises  and  Roots  Peat  Farm  in  Lake  County,  and  Hyponex 
Corporation  and  Markman  Peat  Company  in  Whiteside  County.  Illinois  ranked  fifth  of  20  states 
in  production  of  peat.  In  1992,  peat  production  and  value  jumped  41%  and  34%,  respectively. 
More  than  96%  of  the  state's  peat  was  sold  in  package  form  for  general  soil  improvement. 
Small  amounts  were  sold  in  bulk  form  for  nurseries  and  earthworm  cultivation. 

Gemstones 

Production  of  fluorite  and  accessory  minerals  is  limited  to  mineral-specimen  grade  in  Illinois.  As 
a  result,  gemstones  contributed  little  to  the  total  value  of  mineral  production.  The  estimated 
value  of  gemstones  must  be  withheld  in  Illinois;  however,  it  increased  about  31%  in  1992.  Illi- 
nois ranked  15th  of  50  states  producing  gemstones. 

MINERALS  PROCESSED 

Minerals  extracted  mainly  in  other  states  or  foreign  countries  but  processed  in  Illinois  include 
ground  barite,  calcined  gypsum,  crude  iodine,  iron-oxide  pigments,  natural  gas  liquids,  expand- 
ed perlite,  pig  iron,  sulfur,  exfoliated  vermiculite,  primary  slab  zinc,  and  secondary  slab  zinc. 
The  total  value  of  processed  minerals  is  incomplete  because  the  two  largest  producers  of  pig 
iron  did  not  respond  to  the  USBM  annual  survey  and,  therefore,  no  figures  are  available  for  pig- 
iron  production  in  the  state. 

Ground  Barite 

J.  M.  Huber  Corporation  in  Quincy,  Adams  County;  American  Minerals  in  Rosiclare,  Hardin 
County;  and  Harcros  Pigments  in  East  St.  Louis,  St.  Clair  County,  continued  to  process  ground 
barite.  The  ground  barite  processed  in  Illinois  is  used  almost  exclusively  as  a  filler  or  extender 
in  paints. 

Columbium  and  Tantalum 

Fansteel  in  Cook  County  is  no  longer  processing  columbium-tantalum  concentrate  imported 
from  foreign  countries,  but  the  firm  retains  a  corporate  office  in  North  Chicago.  Columbium  and 
tantalum  are  used  primarily  to  produce  various  steel  alloys. 

Calcined  Gypsum 

The  National  Gypsum  Company  in  Lake  County  processed  calcined  gypsum  from  gypsum 
mined  in  Michigan.  The  product  is  used  primarily  for  prefabricated  housing  materials  such  as 
wallboard,  which  is  increasingly  in  demand.  It  is  used  in  manufactured  (mobile)  homes  and  in 
the  building  and  remodeling  of  homes  and  offices.  Repair  and  remodeling  remained  a  strong 
market  for  the  gypsum  industry. 

Production  and  value  of  calcined  gypsum  increased  about  10%  in  1992  as  the  economy 
began  to  gain  slowly.  Although  gypsum  wallboard  prices  hit  a  14-year  low  early  in  1992,  they 
rebounded  by  the  end  of  the  year  and  were  expected  to  continue  rising  during  1993  as  the  con- 
struction industry  continued  to  recover. 

Crude  Iodine 

Crude  iodine  was  processed  into  inorganic  compounds  for  commercial  use  at  three  Illinois 
plants:  Allied  Signal  Company  in  Metropolis,  Massac  County;  West  Agro  in  Des  Plaines,  Cook 
County;  and  ECHOLAB  in  Joliet,  Will  County.  Although  crude  iodine  is  used  primarily  as  a 
catalyst  or  stabilizer,  it  also  is  added  to  animal  feed,  salt,  inks,  colorants,  pharmaceuticals,  sani- 
tary products  and  industrial  disinfectants.  Consumption  in  Illinois  increased  about  32%  in  1992. 

Iron-Oxide  Pigments 

Finished  pigments  were  produced  from  iron  ore  imported  from  other  states  by  five  companies: 
the  Prince  Manufacturing  Company  in  Adams  County,  George  B.  Smith  Color  Company  in  Kane 
County,  AST  Company  in  Madison  County,  Harcros  Pigments  in  St.  Clair  County,  and  Solomon 

16 


Grinding  Service  in  Sangamon  County.  The  types  of  natural  iron-oxide  pigments  produced 
included  black  (magnetite),  brown  iron  oxide,  red  iron  oxide  (including  pyrite  and  cinder),  and 
yellow  iron  oxide.  Synthetic  black,  brown,  red,  and  yellow  iron  oxides  were  also  produced.  Illi- 
nois continued  to  rank  second  nationally  in  value  of  finished  iron-oxide  pigments. 

Natural  Gas  Liquids 

Natural  gas  liquids  include  ethane,  propane,  isobutane,  unsplit  butane,  and  a  combination  of 
gasoline  and  liquefied  petroleum  gas.  Natural  gas  liquids  were  processed  in  Douglas  County  by 
the  U.S.  Industrial  Chemical  Company,  a  division  of  Quantum  Chemical  Corporation.  The  U.S. 
Department  of  Energy  reports  that  the  942  million  cubic  feet  of  gas  processed  in  Illinois  in  1992 
was  all  produced  in  Illinois.  The  total  liquids  extracted  from  gas  in  Illinois  amounted  to  88,000 
barrels. 

Expanded  Perlite 

Crude  perlite  mined  outside  the  state  was  processed  to  expanded  perlite  by  three  companies: 
Silbrico  Corporation  in  Cook  County,  Illinois  Strong-Lite  Products  Corporation  in  La  Salle 
County,  and  Manville  Products  Corporation  in  Will  County.  (Scheller  International  Corporation 
acquired  Manville  Products  in  1992.)  Production  and  value  of  expanded  perlite  decreased  6.2% 
and  15.1%,  respectively,  but  the  average  price  per  ton  increased  8.4%  in  1992.  Illinois  ranked 
fifth  of  33  states  in  quantity  of  expanded  perlite  sold  and  used. 

Expanded  perlite  is  used  primarily  in  roof  insulation  board  and  for  horticultural  purposes. 
Other  uses  include  lightweight  aggregate  for  concrete  and  plaster,  insulation,  and  filters. 

Pig  Iron  and  Raw  Steel 

The  American  Iron  and  Steel  Institute  in  Washington,  D.C.,  ranked  Illinois  fifth  in  raw  steel 
production.  The  state  produced  7.24  million  tons  or  8.6%  of  the  U.S.  output  in  1992.  Although 
there  was  a  slight  gain  in  raw  steel  production — less  than  1%  in  1992 — major  changes  seem  to 
indicate  problems. 

Acme  Steel  Company  changed  its  name  to  Acme  Metals  Inc.  to  reflect  corporate  restruc- 
turing— not  the  company's  basic  strategy  of  making  steel  for  niche  customers.  Acme  produces 
steel,  steel  strapping  and  strapping  tools,  welded  steel,  pipes  and  tubes,  and  automotive  jacks. 
Acme  is  studying  the  feasibility  of  installing  a  thin  slab  caster/hot  strip  mill  at  its  Riverdale  facil- 
ity to  replace  the  present  ingot  pouring  and  rolling  and  narrow  hot  strip  mill  facilities.  It  would 
use  steel  produced  in  Acme's  basic  oxygen  furnace,  also  at  Riverdale  in  Cook  County. 

Inland  Steel  Company  has  been  restructuring  to  reduce  losses  and  staff.  They  hope  to 
cut  staff  by  3,600  to  4,000  workers.  Laclede  Steel  Company  is  also  restructuring.  They  will 
close  their  wire  mill  in  Alton,  Illinois,  and  expand  their  wire-making  facility  as  well  as  construct  a 
recovery  plant  to  process  hazardous  dust  in  Hammond,  Indiana.  The  Hammond  operation  is 
closer  to  the  company's  major  market.  Laclede's  mini-mill  at  Alton  will  not  be  affected  by  the 
closing.  National  Steel  Corporation  will  shut  down  its  cold-roll  finishing  units  at  their  Granite  City 
steel  plant.  Some  employees  will  be  transferred  to  the  Mishawaka  plant  in  Indiana  where  they 
are  moving  their  headquarters  from  Pittsburg,  Pennsylvania. 

The  St.  Anne  Foundry  plant  at  Kankakee  in  Kankakee  County  was  destroyed  by  fire,  but 
the  company  has  indicated  that  it  will  rebuild.  USX  Corporation  closed  its  southeast  Chicago 
South  Works  steel  mill.  They  are  negotiating  with  a  mini-mill  operator,  which  plans  to  purchase 
the  plant  for  manufacture  of  stainless  steel.  Civic  leaders  are  also  evaluating  the  site  for  a 
housing  project  to  relocate  people,  if  a  new  airport  is  located  at  Lake  Calumet. 

Several  companies  have  announced  new  plants  or  facility  upgrades.  Amsted  Industries  of 
Chicago  plans  to  reopen  Am  Steel  Foundries  in  Granite  City.  Birmingham  Steel  Corporation's 
Illinois  Steel  Division  at  Kankakee  has  been  completely  upgraded.  Laclede  Steel  has  improved 
its  pipe  finishing  and  shipping  facility  in  Vandalia,  Fayette  County,  and  its  caster  mold  and 
electric  arc  furnace  in  Alton,  Madison  County.  National  Steel,  the  nation's  fourth  largest 
steelmaker,  brought  its  new  slab  caster  online  at  its  Granite  City  steel  plant. 

In  the  United  States,  pig  iron  was  produced  by  15  companies  in  approximately  60  blast 
furnaces,  of  which  42  to  44  were  in  continuous  operation.  Five  blast  furnaces  are  in  Illinois.  At 
the  same  site,  steel-making  furnaces  used  most  of  the  pig  iron  in  liquid  form  for  refining  raw 
steel. 


17 


Slag  (Iron  and  Steel) 

In  1992,  Illinois  ranked  fifth  of  28  states  in  the  quantity  of  iron  and  steel  slag  sold  or  used.  Four 
companies  operating  eight  plants  in  Clay,  Cook,  Madison, and  Whiteside  Counties  processed 
slag  from  iron  and  steel  furnaces.  The  slag  was  used  mostly  for  construction  aggregate — road- 
base  material,  asphaltic  concrete,  railroad  ballast,  and  fill — and  also  for  the  manufacture  of 
mineral  wool. 

Recovered  Elemental  Sulfur 

Illinois  ranked  seventh  nationally  of  28  states  in  quantity  and  value  of  recovered  elemental  sul- 
fur. Four  companies  in  three  counties,  Crawford,  Madison,  and  Will,  recovered  elemental  sulfur 
as  a  byproduct  of  their  oil  refinery  operations.  Although  sales  of  sulfur  increased  12.2%  from 
239,736  tons  in  1991  to  269,062  tons  in  1992,  its  total  value  decreased  29.7%  from  $17.5 
million  in  1991  to  $12.3  million  in  1992,  indicating  a  precipitous  drop  in  sulfur  prices.  Sulfur 
differs  from  most  other  major  mineral  commodities  in  its  primary  use  as  a  chemical  reagent 
rather  than  as  a  component  of  a  finished  product.  The  largest  use  is  for  agriculture,  as  a 
component  of  phosphatic  fertilizers. 

Exfoliated  Vermiculite 

Illinois  ranked  third  nationally  of  20  states  in  quantity  of  exfoliated  vermiculite  sold  in  1992. 
Exfoliated  vermiculite  processed  from  crude  vermiculite  mined  outside  the  state  was  produced 
by  three  companies  in  Du  Page,  La  Salle,  and  Macoupin  Counties.  Sales  increased  17.8%  and 
value,  17.4%,  in  1992.  The  average  value  per  ton  decreased  slightly  (0.4%).  In  Illinois,  exfoli- 
ated vermiculite  has  the  following  uses: 

1991  (%)       1992  (%) 


Loose-fill  insulation 

19.4 

17.5 

Block  insulation 

21.8 

29.6 

Concrete  and  plastic  aggregate 

13.8 

7.3 

Horticulture  and  agriculture 

19.8 

42.1 

Fireproofing  and  other  uses 

25.2 

3.5 

Primary  and  Secondary  Slab  Zinc 

U.S.  refined  metal  production  was  up  slightly  from  1991  and  the  highest  since  1981.  Only 
three  companies  in  the  United  States  operated  four  primary  zinc  refineries,  including  one  in 
Illinois:  the  Big  River  Zinc  Company  at  Sauget. 

U.S.  smelter  production  was  near  capacity  and  the  highest  since  1981.  There  were  ten 
secondary  smelters  processing  secondary  slab  zinc  in  the  United  States,  including  one  in 
Illinois:  the  Illinois  Smelting  Company  in  Cook  County. 

Although  production  data  for  individual  states  are  not  available,  consumption  data  indicate 
that  Illinois  was  the  top  consumer  of  slab  zinc  and  accounted  for  more  than  15%  of  the  reported 
U.S.  consumption. 

Most  of  the  secondary  feed  was  crude  zinc  calcine  recovered  from  dust  generated  by  steel- 
making  using  electric  arc  furnaces  (EAF).  The  dust  was  processed  at  the  Horsehead  Resource 
Development  Company  (HRD)  plants  in  Illinois,  Pennsylvania,  and  Tennessee.  At  Alton,  Illinois, 
Laclede  Steel  Company  was  constructing  a  facility  that  could  process  36,000  tons  of  EAF- 
generated  dust  per  year.  Production  was  scheduled  for  early  1992. 

Eagle  Zinc  Company  at  Hillsboro,  Illinois  is  the  only  domestic  producer  of  zinc  oxide  by  the 
American  process.  This  is  sold  directly  for  use  in  animal  feed  and  other  agricultural  purposes. 

PRODUCTS  MANUFACTURED  FROM  MINERALS 

MINED  IN  AND  OUT  OF  STATE 

Cement 

Production    In  1992,  portland  cement  manufacturing  in  Illinois  consumed  an  estimated  4.0 
million  tons  of  raw  materials.  Raw  materials  may  include  cement  rock  (an  argillaceous  lime- 
stone containing  calcium,  silica,  alumina,  and  magnesia),  limestone,  clay,  shale,  sand,  fly  ash, 
slag,  gypsum,  and  tripoli.  Illinois  ranked  eighth  of  39  states  in  quantity  of  portland  cement  pro- 
duced. Masonry  cement  contributed  little  to  the  total  value  of  products  manufactured,  and  Illi- 
nois ranked  last  of  36  states  producing  masonry  cement.  Cement  was  produced  by  the  Illinois 

18 


0.0 


total  consumption 


1955 


1960 


1965 


1970  1975  1980  1985  1990 


Figure  15   Production  and  consumption  of  finished  portland  cement  in  Illinois,  1955-1992. 

Cement  Company,  a  subsidiary  of  Centex  Corporation,  and  Lone  Star  Industries,  both  in  La 
Salle  County;  Dixon-Marquette  Cement,  a  subsidiary  of  Prairie  Materials  Sales  in  Lee  County; 
and  Missouri  Portland  Cement  Company,  a  division  of  Cementia  Oldings  AG  in  Massac  County. 
All  four  companies  produced  portland  cement,  and  all  except  Illinois  Cement  Company  pro- 
duced masonry  cement,  although  in  very  small  quantities. 

Sales  of  portland  cement  increased  1.3%  in  1992,  with  the  value  per  ton  increasing  about 
1%  from  $41.21  in  1991  to  $41.61  in  1992  (table  22).  Nearly  all  the  cement  was  delivered  by 
truck  in  bulk  form,  although  small  amounts  were  shipped  by  rail  and  barge. 

Consumption    Illinois  ranked  fourth  behind  California,  Texas,  and  Florida  in  consumption  of 
cement  products  in  1992.  About  3.3  million  tons  of  portland  cement  (fig.  15)  and  73,452  tons  of 
masonry  cement  were  consumed  in  Illinois.  According  to  these  figures,  the  use  of  portland 
cement  decreased  by  10.8%,  and  masonry  cement,  by  9.8%.  Beginning  in  the  late  1970s  and 
1980s,  an  increasing  portion  of  the  cement  consumed  in  the  state  was  also  was  being  manu- 
factured in  the  state. 

Clay  Products 

For  up-to-date  information  about  the  amount  and  value  of  clay  products  manufactured  in  Illinois, 
the  Illinois  State  Geological  Survey  sends  questionnaires  every  year  to  all  in-state  producers. 

In  1992,  clay  products  were  valued  at  $54.1  million,  13.6%  lower  than  in  1991.  Whiteware 
and  pottery  decreased  from  $36.1  million  in  1991  to  $34.7  million  in  1992.  All  other  clay  prod- 
ucts decreased  from  $26.5  million  in  1991  to  $19.4  million  in  1992.  The  Regal  China  Company 
at  Antioch  in  Lake  County  closed  on  June  30,  1992,  after  showing  no  production  for  the  year. 

Coke 

Production    All  data  on  coke  production  in  Illinois  have  been  withheld.  U.S.  production 
decreased  about  2.6%  from  24.0  million  tons  in  1991  to  23.4  million  tons  in  1992.  U.S.  coke 
breeze  production  decreased  less  than  1%. 

Consumption  and  uses    Coke  is  used  for  pig-iron  production,  foundry  and  other  industrial 
purposes,  and  residential  heating.  U.S.  coke  consumption  increased  8.9%  from  27.5  million 
tons  in  1991  to  30.0  million  tons  in  1992.  The  United  States  imports  coke  from  Japan  and 
smaller  amounts  from  Australia,  Canada,  and  United  Kingdom.  Coke  breeze  was  used  as  fuel 
in  steam  and  agglomerating  plants.  State-by-state  data  on  coke  breeze  are  no  longer  available. 
U.S.  breeze  distribution  increased  9.6%  from  2.1  million  tons  in  1991  to  2.3  million  tons  in  1992. 


19 


total  consumption 


quicklime 


1955 


1960  1965  1970  1975  1980  1985  1990 


Figure  16   Consumption  of  quicklime  and  hydrated  lime  in  Illinois,  1955-1992. 

Glass 

Glass  and/or  fiberglass  is  manufactured  in  Du  Page,  Lake,  La  Salle,  Logan,  McLean,  Macon, 
Madison,  Marion,  Montgomery,  St.  Clair,  and  Will  Counties.  Production  data  are  not  available. 
Ball  Corporation  purchased  the  assets  of  Kerr  Glass  Manufacturing  Corporaton,  which  manufac- 
tures glass  containers  mainly  for  the  food  processing  industry.  The  Kerr  manufacturing  facility  in 
Plainfield,  Will  County,  was  included  in  the  purchase. 

Lime 

Production    Illinois  ranked  seventh  of  33  states  in  production  of  lime.  The  top  seven  states 
— Missouri,  Ohio,  Pennsylvania,  Alabama,  Kentucky,  Texas  and  Illinois — accounted  for  63% 
(11.3  million  tons)  of  the  total  U.S.  output.  Although  Illinois  lime  data  cannot  be  disclosed,  both 
production  and  value  increased  about  1%  after  decreasing  about  10%  in  1991.  Three  plants  in 
Cook  County  supplied  the  state's  entire  output.  Two  plants  owned  by  Marblehead  Lime  Com- 
pany, a  division  of  General  Dynamics,  produced  quicklime  and  hydrated  lime;  the  Vulcan 
Materials  Company  plant  produced  quicklime.  Marblehead  Lime  Company,  with  two  plants  in 
Illinois  and  one  each  in  Indiana  and  Michigan,  was  the  third  largest  company  producing  lime  in 
the  United  States  in  1992. 

Consumption  and  uses    In  1992,  Illinois  consumed  546,000  tons  of  quicklime,  9.5%  less  than 
in  1991,  and  182,000  tons  of  hydrated  lime,  3.4%  more  than  in  the  previous  year  (fig.  16).  The 
steel  industry  remains  the  main  consumer  of  lime,  which  is  used  as  a  flux  in  steel  refining  to 
remove  impurities.  In  recent  years,  since  the  steel  industry  has  been  in  a  depressed  state,  con- 
sumption has  been  relatively  low.  Steel  output  is  expected  to  increase  modestly,  however,  as 
power  plants,  municipal  water  plants,  and  chemical  firms  showed  an  increased  use  of  lime. 
Lime  consumption  for  flue  gas  desulfurization  is  expected  to  show  some  growth  as  a  result  of 
the  passage  of  the  Clean  Air  Act  Amendments  (CAAA)  of  1990.  The  phase  I  compliance  dead- 
line is  January  1,  1995,  which  means  that  utility  companies  have  decided  on  their  compliance 
strategies  by  this  reporting  in  mid-1994.  If  the  use  of  lime  is  a  tactic  in  the  compliance  strate- 
gies, the  consumption  data  for  1993  and  1994  should  show  an  increase. 


20 


PREUMINARY  PRODUCTION  DATA:  1993 

Minerals  Extracted 

The  total  value  of  minerals  mined  in  1993  was  an  estimated  $2.1  billion,  a  decrease  of  20.6% 
from  1992,  according  to  preliminary  data  (table  23).  This  decrease  reflects  the  30%  drop  in  coal 
production,  mainly  due  to  a  strike  by  the  United  Mine  Workers  of  America  (UMWA).  Even  then, 
coal  continued  to  be  the  leading  mineral  commodity  in  Illinois  and  contributed  about  56.4%  of 
the  total  value.  The  construction  aggregates — stone,  sand  and  gravel — ranked  second  with 
25.4%  of  the  total  value,  and  crude  oil  came  in  third  with  16.1%. 

Fuels 

Fossil  fuel  production  was  valued  at  about  $1.5  billion  in  1993,  26.4%  less  than  in  1992. 

Coal    The  estimated  per  ton  value  of  coal  in  1993  was  $27.66,  the  same  as  in  1992.  Coal 
production  decreased  an  estimated  30%  to  42.2  million  tons  in  1993  because  of  the  UMWA 
strike.  This  drop  will  put  Illinois  in  sixth  place  nationally  behind  Wyoming,  Kentucky,  West 
Virginia,  Pennsylvania,  and  Texas. 

Consumption  of  Illinois  coal  in  the  United  States  during  the  first  9  months  of  1993  dropped 
26.6%  (table  24).  Total  coal  consumed  in  Illinois  in  the  first  9  months  was  up  slightly  (1.1%) 
after  decreasing  about  6%  in  1992  (table  25).  Some  electric  utility  companies  turned  to  stock- 
piles to  make  up  for  deliveries  disrupted  by  the  strike  and  the  severe  flooding  that  closed  the 
Mississippi  River  to  barge  traffic  for  about  6  weeks. 

The  Illinois  Coal  Development  Board  (ICDB)  broke  ground  for  a  coal  gasification  plant  at 
the  Illinois  Coal  Development  Park  in  Carterville.  The  plant  will  test  a  process  to  convert  Illinois 
high-sulfur  coal  into  environmentally  safe  and  economically  efficient  products.  The  process  will 
also  generate  liquid  byproducts  for  use  in  making  plastics  and  gasoline,  and  another  byproduct 
that  will  be  used  to  help  operate  other  commercial  mild-gas  plants. 

Crude  oil  and  natural  gas    Crude  oil  production  in  1993  is  estimated  to  be  19.1  million  barrels, 
a  1.7%  decrease  from  production  in  1992  (table  23).  Production  is  estimated  to  have  a  value  of 
$17.50  per  barrel,  making  the  total  worth  $334.1  million.  Oil  price  per  barrel  is  estimated  to 
have  decreased  about  9%  from  1 992. 

Natural  gas  production  and  value  are  estimated  to  have  decreased  more  than  22%.  The 
estimated  unit  value  is  $2.30  per  Mcf  in  1993. 

Industrial  and  Construction  Materials 

The  major  flooding  that  occurred  in  the  Mississippi  and  Illinois  River  valleys  during  the  summer 
of  1993  had  little  impact  on  Illinois  mineral  producers.  Only  a  few  had  to  shut  down.  Those 
affected  most  were  dependent  on  barges  for  transportation. 

Illinois  continued  to  rank  16th  nationally  in  the  value  of  nonfuel  minerals  produced  in  1993 
and  accounted  for  2.32%  of  the  nation's  total.  Preliminary  data  for  1993  show  Illinois  still 
leading  the  nation  in  production  of  fluorspar,  industrial  sand,  and  tripoli  and  ranking  second  in 
production  of  crushed  stone.  Stone  and  sand  and  gravel  increased  slightly,  both  in  production 
and  value;  whereas  clays  dropped  significantly  in  1993.  The  industrial  minerals  sector  is 
expected  to  rebound  slowly,  given  relatively  low  interest  rates  for  housing  starts  and  also  the 
support  of  the  Federal  highway  construction  program. 

Metals  and  Other  Minerals 

Zinc  (sphalerite  concentrate)  and  barite  were  the  only  byproducts  for  which  production  esti- 
mates were  reported  from  the  Illinois  fluorspar  mines  in  1993.  Zinc  production  was  estimated  to 
have  decreased  2%,  whereas  barite  was  expected  to  have  decreased  75%.  Copper  and  lead 
were  also  mined  in  1993,  but  estimates  of  their  production  were  not  available.  Production  of 
these  metals,  byproducts  of  the  fluorspar  industry,  remained  relatively  small,  adding  less  than 
2%  to  the  state's  nonfuel  mineral  production. 

Minerals  Processed 

Preliminary  data  for  1993  are  not  yet  available  for  most  of  the  minerals  processed  in  Illinois. 
The  American  Iron  and  Steel  Institute  reported  that  Illinois  raw  steel  production  increased  to 

21 


7,948,655  net  tons,  up  9.7%  from  1992.  The  steel  plants  are  continuing  to  restructure  and 
upgrade  to  be  more  efficient  and  economical  but  less  expensive  to  operate  as  they  try  to  keep 
pace  with  foreign  competition. 

Gains  made  by  the  gypsum  industry  are  expected  to  continue  in  1993  as  residential  con- 
struction, primarily  of  single  family  housing,  continues  to  grow.  Industry  reports  indicate  that 
home  repairs  and  remodeling,  including  "do-it-yourself"  projects,  constitute  the  growth  sectors. 

Products  Manufactured  from  Minerals 

Preliminary  figures  for  1993  show  that  production  and  value  of  portland  cement  were  approxi- 
mately the  same  as  they  were  in  1992.  Illinois  remains  a  top  consumer  of  portland  cement. 
Masonry  cement  production  stayed  about  the  same  as  in  1992;  however,  its  value  is  expected 
to  decrease.  It  is  expected  that  lime  production  and  value  will  increase  slightly  (less  than  1%). 
As  more  clay-product  plants  go  out  of  business,  clay  production  will  probably  drop. 


22 


CD 


CM 
CD 
CO 


CD    o 

>  £ 


CD 
C?i= 

i  5 


C\J 

en 

CD 

5 


CD 


05 
O 

3 
TJ 
O 

Q- 
O 


o 
_   o 

>  £ 


to 


o 

<D      5      3 

<         > 


T3 

CD 
(/J 
en 
CD 
o 
O 


T3 


x 
CD 

2 

CD 

C 


T3 

C 
CO 


o 

3 
O 


CD 


O 

_   o 

«  ° 

>    £ 


CD    CD    lO 
CD    CM    i- 

o 
o 

■«fr    00 

^  oi  cm 

CM    i- 

^ 

co  c\i 

CD 

CD 

co 

N- 

CM 

o 

T— 

N 

00 

»t 

o 

CD 

CM 

t 

s 

en 

S 

r- 

co 

t^ 

N 

en 

oo 

oo" 

cm" 

co" 

co" 

CD 

CD 

CO 

CM 

CO 

CO 

oo 

o 

T- 

CM 
CO 
CO 

CO 

CD 
3 

o" 

CO 

aS 

o 
en 

en 


LO  O)  t^ 

CO  t-  y- 

00  CD  C\i 

CM  CM 


N 

r 

,— 

CT> 

o 

Tt 

1 — 

CO 

o 

CT> 

o 

CF> 

cm" 

* 

T^ 

N 

o 

co 

oo 

s 

CO 

o 

in  co  cd 

CO  CD    CO 

o  o   ■* 

o"  o>" 

CO  T- 


l"»    O 
CM    CM 


00 
CD 


CO 
CO 


o 

en 

CM 
CD 

t 

co 

CM 

o 

s 

CT>" 

o 

cd" 

o 

*"" 

s 

r— 

cm' 

h-  i-  r- 

m  m  n 

CD    O)    CO 


2  £  *= 

"o  "°  R 

c  c  o 

CO  CO  r— 

co  co  o 

3  3-= 

o  o  = 

£  £  E 


o 

CD 
CO 


CO 

< 

LU 


z 
o 

I- 
o 

IT 
H 
CO 

z 
o 
o 

Q 


o    co 

8  ? 


CD 
CO 

00  t- 
CM  CO 
h-    LO 

cm" 

t"  cm" 

O    CD 

O  CD 
OO  00 
CO    "*■ 


T3  T3 

C  C 

CO  CO 

CO  CO 


35 


3 


o 
o 

5 

co 

CM 

00 

CD 

cm" 

eo" 

CM 

O 

CO 

en 

en 
co 
co" 

CD 


LO 
LO 
h-" 
O 
CD 


LO     O  g 

ID    *  Is" 


LO  LO 
OO  00 
CM    CM 


CM 


•* 

CM 

Q. 

C 

o 

■Q 

CD 

3 

LO 

.C 

00 

CM 

C 

cm" 

o 

T-  3      0  T- 

co         <r  00        co 


o 

CM             g  O  CM  >    ■<* 

•*             2  *~  CD  >     t- 

•*             ■*  CM  CO  •* 

CM"          g  r-."  CO"  m" 

05  LO  O)  ■* 

CM  ■* 


CM 


T— 

■* 

LO     LO 

LO 

00 

CO    CO    „ 

00 

00 

•^  ■*  °> 

1- 

co" 

N." 

Is-"  N 

c-." 

00 

CO 

cm" 

CO    > 

00    > 
LO 
CO 
CD 


CM    Ol  LO 

CO    CO  •* 


CO 
00 
CM 


LO 

00 

cm" 
in 


CM 
LO 
CO 

1^ 

CO 

00 

■*" 

in 

•*" 

CM 
CO 

o 
r~- 
cm" 
cd 


CO  CO      CO 

c         c    c 

O  OO 


"O  T3 

C  C 

CO  CO 

CO  CO 


fc         fc  fe   0)  fc  i 


Q 

111 

CO  *>  , 

H 

«     ^ 

O 

< 
DC 

o>  < 

CO 

_l 

O 

CD 

_    h- 

2  O 

h- 

LU 

CO 

T3 

3 

3  1— 

X 

=5 

O 

to 

LU 

LL 

O 

O 

z 

E 
p 
o 
-o 

TD 

c 

CO 
0) 

c 
o 


c 
o 

s  < 


E  c5»  §  «  S 

0  £  E  3  ^. 

0  ™  o  -o  ^r 

O  CO  CO 


lb 


c 
CO 

n  U 

en  "O 

CD  CD 

c  S2 

O  O 

E  - 

S  "o 

»  3 

4  55 

iS  jc 


^ 


1 

CO 
CD 
W 

E 


o 


CD 
00 


01  oi„ 

00  00  CT 

o"  o" 

CM  CM 


s 

CM 


3 
O 

-C 


o 

c 
c 

CO 

o 

D         *^ 
-J     CO 

<  s 


CD 
00 
O 
CM 


T3 
CD 
CO 
CO 
CD 


•0 

eo 

CD 

CO 

(0 

O 

O 

a> 

CO 

« 

T3 

E 

a 

LU 
CO 
CO 

O    -  O 

CC      3 
0.   CO 


23 


to'^ 


d)   o 


TO    ±; 

$  i 
< 


CD    o 

>  £ 


CD 

TO     *; 

C 


CU 


o 

CD 
CO 


CD    o 

3   2 
>  5 


3 
C 


1 


CD 

5 


CD 
O 

CO 
in 
CO 

o 
in 

CO 
CM 

CO 
00 
CM 

oo" 

cm" 

o 

CM 

CD 
00 

LO 
00 


CD 

o 


O    CD    CO 

o  ■*  r- 
co  co  o 


CO 
CD 

m 
cm' 

CM 


CO 

oo 

CO 

o 

CD 


CO 

cm' 


^t  in  co 

CD    1^  CO 

in  co  oo 

r«-~  ■*  ■<* 

00    O  CO 
CM 


CD 
CD 
CM 


CM 
O 

o 


CD 

cm" 


CM 

CO 


CO 

I- 
o 

Z> 
Q 
O 
DC 

Q_ 


Q  ■= 

W  g 

<  *—  co 

O  0)    o 


O 


T3 

— 

CD 

3 

2 

O 

m 

to 

CO 

3 

3 

C 

CO 

CO 

u 
T3 

E 

CD 

c 

CD 
CO 

•52 
o 

2 

■o 

CD 

O 
CJ 
05 

T3 

3 
O- 

o 

3 
CO 
CD 

to 

E 

CO 
CD 

CD 

o 

C 

c 

2 

CD 

C 

E 

_l 

< 

3 
CD 

CO 

CO 

nj 

O 

zi 

u 

■D 

cj 

o 

I- 

io 

3 

_l 

TO 

CD 

LU 

CD 

•a 

< 

jz 

3 

I— 

CJ 

o 

H 

*"- 

CO 

< 

3 

a. 

o 

CO 

CD 

3 

> 

1- 

O 

^ 

h- 

To 

CO 

CO 

03 

o 

(0 
> 

o 

(0 

T3 
CD 

o 

CD- 
CD 

CD 
CO 
_to 
TO 
0 


oj 
w 

E 

T3 

C 
TO 


CO  p 

«  CD 

-^  £ 

>>  O 

CD  U 

|  1 


CO 

TO 
CJ 
CD 
O 
O 
CD 

o 

TO 
55 


0  £ 

1  CD 
=  CJ 

.  c 

CO  3 

m  O 


5    S 

CO       ,_ 


c 

CD 

E 
t: 

TO 
CD- 
CD 
D 


C 

g 

CO 

c 

CD 

E 
'■a 


•^  CJ 


c 

CD 
£1 


=    jj    w   b 
1   °   2 

TO    ^     TO 


,-  to  O 

si   2  £  a> 

TO  M  co 

:     §  .S  € 

"      -=  m  CO 


a> 

-Q 
TO 

'5 

> 

(0 

•4-  CO 

~      CO    .Q 

■g    « 

S: 

CO     TO 

TO    c: 
O)  a> 

■a   to 


CD 
Q. 

5 

o 
o 

C     ,_- 


TO    3> 
>     TO 

?! 

"■E   cd 
o  £ 


w   i: 


TO 
T3 


TO 

E 


o 
>< 

CD 

E" 
3 
</> 

CL 


■g 

CD 

C 


O) 


TO 

8l 


O     TO     co 

S  I  13 


O  TO 

<  c 

DC  to 

^5   o  w  -E 
E  ct 


N 

CD     oj 

"7     C3- 


TO     (1) 

oS  £ 


en  o, 

—  TO 
CD     c 

Q-  o 

"O     !=. 

CD  ^^ 
T3  CD 
C     TO 

a » 

"2  2 
TO   i 

3    « 

TO  C 
C     (0 

1     £ 

LU     "5 

si 

o  i 

?  o 

0-    o 


|  S 

.  c 

c  S 

|? 

E  CD 

CD  CL 

CJ  CD 

^  "° 

CT  C 

C  ~ 

to  u 

TO  CD 


1  S 
^  CO  CD 
£    H    £1 

'is 

Q    o 

8* 

o.  m 
Q  -5 


c5 

3 
T3 
O 


T3 

.     Q) 

.9     3 
=     O 

E  £ 
in    2 

fe    * 

^   to 

CD     O 


«     C    -2 


—     TO 
CD     O 


03 
Ql 

E 
o 


>- 

CD 

e 

O      3 


TO    C/3 

■5 

to    -5 

E     TO 

•2  B 

TO    to 

a  lu 


to  O 

°  a. 

S^ 

W  3 

—  T3 

c  2 

2  °- 

ra  5 

a.  ® 


.-    ® 


a>    b    3  }2 
-   c  "B   - 


24 


c 
*-  o 

co  o 
gel 

=  « 


CD    O 

>  w 


CD    O 


0) 

o 

3 

o 

S 
> 

o 
5 

CO 

O 

c 

<S  <t  o  co  cm  cd 

o       d  d  ■<*  in 


o 
c\i 


in  co 

<tOOOO)OON 

q  s  q  q  n  s  n 
co  d  d  d  *"  co  co 


■*  ■*  <  cd  co  f-  o 

i-  *"-  5?  F"  CNJ  h-  o 

•<* 

o"  co"      N-"  in"  in  co" 

lO  CO         (MOO)  oo 
CO   CO          CO   LO   i-   i- 

co" 
o 

CO 

*-"  ■<*"      o"  ■>-"  co"  m" 
c\i  rr       co 

co" 

(DOI^OINOO 
CO  CO  00  CO  CD  O  O 
<t  OlO't  OOlffl 

CM 

co 
o 

co"  |C  o>"  cm"  "*"  lo"  cm" 

ooNn>too 

CD  h-  CM  lO          00  t- 

cm"  co"  oo"            t-" 

h-  l-  <  l-  CM  O  CM 
O  CD  *■  O  ■*  CO  CO 


00 
LO 
LO 


CM  -t 
O  00 

n-  co 


i-  cm  r>-  in 

■*  O) 
t-  CM 


in  co  i-  co  oo  co  co 
co  co  in  co  co  ^t  oo 

0001^10410 


O  CD 

CO     T- 


O   00 
CO   CO 


CM 

o 
cm" 


CO 

m 

co 

in 

CO 

m 

c 

X3 

c  «: 

c 

c 

c 

c 

o 

a 

o 

o 

o 

o 

d  3 

"D 

TD 

o  o 

■o 

"D 

■D 

•o 

C 

C 

c  c 

c 

C 

c 

c 

03 

co 

o  o 

co 

CO 

CO 

CO 

CO 

m 

CO 

in 

CO 

co 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

o 

1- 

O 

II 

O 

O 

o 

o 

'3 

5  X? 

O" 

>  2 

(0  T3 

to   o> 

o>-n 

CO    CO 
=    CD  CD 

O 
C    <1) 

co  2  S-'ln 

CO   *- 

■5  "§2  2 

O    Z.    CO    CO 

>, 

o> 
cd 

« 

go 

oozzowin 

(J)    </) 

P,  c 

O    CD 
CO    £ 

c  9-  — 
O  j;  T3 
<o   10   c 

C  «-  CO 
CO    £"  "5 

E  pi 

^     P     P. 


o 


7.97 
0.90 
NA 
0.002 

81  fc 

- 

•^  in 

CO 

CO  CM 
CO  •«*  O  O  CO  ■<*  CO 

ONOO^NN 

co  d  d  d  1-'  ■*'  co 


co 


CD  N  <  f~  <  N  O         1- 


in  oo 

z 

CM 
00 

z 

rt  r-- 

0 

0"  co" 

CO   CO 

o>  00 

d 

1-- 

LO 

d  co" 
•<t  CD 
r>»  in 

00" 
00 

0" »-" 

CM  *fr 

cm" 

CO 

co"  in" 

co" 

f— 

CO 

CO 

00 

T- 

N 

O 

CD 

00 

CM 

T— 

0 

LD 

3 

O 

CM 

CM 

•r- 

T- 

CO 

*— 

LO 

00 

LO 

00" 

CO 

T-" 

cm" 

LD 

T-T 

co" 

<y> 

T— 

CM 

1 — 

■* 

~jF 

CO 

t^ 

CD 

CD 

1- 

h- 

CD 

T— 

00  CO  <  CO  CM  1-  O  N- 

sa  ^  s  w<f  00  h- 

00"  ■"!■"  CM*  O"  cm"  00* 

(ON  00  CM  t- 

co  co  1-  co  1- 


CM  CD  CM  co  0  in  0 
CO   CO   ■<«■    3   CD   O   O 
CO  T  CD  CO  lO  1-  h- 

2 

00 

O"  CD"                      O*  CM* 

CO    t-                              t    h- 

cm" 

in  in  co   co   <o 

C  o  C  C  C    CI    C 

2  £  ^  3  2  S  2 
-a  -a  o  o  -o  -o  -o 

c  c  c  c  C    c   c 

CO  CO  o  o  CO 

(0  10  ~  ~  (0 

3  3  =  =  3 

0  °  E  E  ° 


£  -C 


CO  CO 

(0  to 

3  3 

o  o 

C  SI  n 


in 

c 
o 

■o 
c 
<0 

CO 

3 

o 

SI 


cu  j2 


CO  T3 

»•§ 

T3    X 

rOOZZOWO)         O 


co  w 

CO  (0 
=  CD  CD 
O 

CO  2  "?-°( 
2  2  ><  c 


E 
c  .9-  — 

O  £  T3 

CO    CO  C 

C   ♦-  CO 

OJ    C  p 

III 


0> 

2 
«5 

0- 

c 
CO 

.0 
co 
E 
< 

p 

CO 


T3 
C 
CO 
CO 
CO 

p 


p 

CO 

E 
c 

CO 
Q. 
CO 

Q 

CO 

o 

c 


CO 

3 
CO 


CD 

o 
o 

CO 

0 
s 

CO 


3 
CO 
CD 

CO 
CD 

c 

CO 
CO 

3 

CD 

CO 

12 

CD 

To 

C7) 

= 

3 

3 

T3 

Z) 

**~ 

C 

CT 

CO 

C 

CO 

CD 

^ 

CD 

0 

3 

TD 

3 

3 

O 

O 

X 

"O 

(/> 

111 

C 

< 

z 


25 


Table  3   Minerals  extracted,  processed,  and  manufactured  in  Illinois,  1992a  (listed  by  county) 


County 


Approximate  rank 
(based  on  total  value") 


Minerals  extracted 
(order  ot  value0) 


Minerals  processed 
(order  of  value) 


Minerals  manufactured 
(order  of  value) 


Adams 

29 

Stone,  sand/gravel,  crude  oil 

Iron  oxide  pigments 
ground  barite 

Alexander 

37 

Tripoli 

— 

Bond 

67 

Crude  oil,  sand/gravel,  clay 

— 

Boone 

73 

Sand/gravel,  stone 

— 

Brown 

88 

Crude  oil 

— 

Bureau 

76 

Sand/gravel 

— 

Calhoun 

95 

Stone 

— 

Carroll 

91 

Stone 

— 

Cass 

— 

— 

— 

Champaign 

61 

Sand/gravel 

— 

Christian 

15 

Coal,  crude  oil,  stone 

— 

Clark 

46 

Crude  oil,  stone,  sand/gravel 

— 

Clay 

35 

Crude  oil 

Slag 

Clinton 

11 

Coal,  crude  oil,  natural  gas, 

— 

Coles 

48 

Sand/gravel,  crude  oil, 
stone,  natural  gas 

— 

Cook 

5 

Stone,  sand/gravel 

Expanded  perlite,  si; 

Crawford 

Cumberland 

De  Kalb 

DeWitt 

Douglas 

Du  Page 

Edgar 

Edwards 

Effingham 

Fayette 

Ford 
Franklin 
Fulton 
Gallatin 

Greene 

Grundy 

Hamilton 

Hancock 

Hardin 

Henderson 

Henry 

Iroquois 

Jackson 

Jasper 

Jefferson 

Jersey 

Jo  Daviess 

Johnson 

Kane 

Kankakee 

Kendall 

Knox 

Lake 

La  Salle 


23 
82 
66 
84 
68 
30 
77 
47 
50 
32 

94 
2 

41 
9 

89 
65 
54 
86 
19 

78 
93 
72 
59 
42 
6 

92 
90 
56 
22 
44 
63 
28 
38 


Clay  products 


Crude  oil,  sand/gravel 
Crude  oil,  sand/gravel 
Stone,  sand/gravel 
Crude  oil 
Stone,  crude  oil 
Stone,  sand/gravel 
Crude  oil,  natural  gas 
Crude  oil 

Crude  oil,  natural  gas, 
Crude  oil,  sand/gravel,  stone, 

natural  gas 
Sand/gravel 
Coal,  crude  oil 
Coal,  sand/gravel 
Coal,  crude  oil,  sand/gravel, 

natural  gas 
Stone 

Sand/gravel 
Crude  oil 
Stone,  crude  oil 
Stone,  fluorspar,  zinc,  gemstones, 

barite,  silver,  germaniumd 
Stone 

Stone,  sand/gravel 
Stone 

Stone,  sand/gravel,  crude  oil 
Crude  oil 
Coal,  crude  oil 
Stone 

Stone,  sand/gravel 
Stone 

Stone,  sand/gravel,  dimension  stone 
Stone,  clay,  sand/gravel 
Stone,  sand/gravel 

Sand/gravel,  peat 

Industrial  sand,  stone, 
sand/gravel,  clay 


pig  irond,  secondary  slabd 
zincd,  crude  iodine 
Sulfur 

Iron-oxide  pigments 

Natural  gas  liquidsd 
Exfoliated  vermiculite 


Lime,  coke 


Glass0 


Ground/crushed  barite 


Slag 


Calcined  gypsum,  crude 
iodined,  columbiumd 
Exfoliated  vermiculite 


Clay  products 


Clay  products 


Portland  cement, 
clay  products, 
masonry  cement, 
glass" 


26 


Table  3   continued 


Approximate  rank 

Minerals  extracted 

Minerals  processed, 

Minerals  manufactured 

County 

(based  on  total  valueb) 

(order  of  valuec) 

(order  of  value) 

(order  of  value) 

Lawrence 

17 

Crude  oil,  sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Lee 

16 

Stone 

— 

Portland/masonry 
cement 

Livingston 

45 

Stone,  clay,  sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Logan 

21 

Coal,  stone,  sand/gravel 

— 

Glass" 

Macon 

71 

Sand/gravel,  crude  oil, 

— 

Glassd 

Macoupin 

7 

Coal,  crude  oil 

Exfoliated  vermiculite 

— 

Madison 

33 

Stone,  crude  oil 

Sulfur,  slag,  pig  irond, 

Clay  products, 
coke  ,  glassd 

sand/gravel 

iron-oxide  pigments 

Marion 

31 

Crude  oil 

Secondary  slab  zincd 

Glassd 

Marshall 

80 

Sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Mason 

51 

Industrial  sand 

— 

— 

Massac 

26 

Stone 

Crude  iodine 

Portland/ 
masonry  cement 

McDonough 

40 

Coal,  stone,  crude  oil 

— 

Clay  products 

McHenry 

27 

Sand/gravel 

— 

— 

McLean 

74 

Sand/gravel 

— 

Fiberglassd 

Menard 

69 

Stone 

— 

— 

Mercer 

— 

— 

— 

— 

Monroe 

81 

Stone,  crude  oil 

— 

— 

Montgomery 

39 

Stone,  crude  oil 

— 

Glassd 

Morgan 

98 

Crude  oil 

— 

— 

Moultrie 

97 

Crude  oil,  sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Ogle 

36 

Industrial  sand,  stone, 
sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Peoria 

60 

Sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Perry 

1 

Coal,  crude  oil 

— 

— 

Piatt 

96 

Sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Pike 

70 

Stone,  sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Pope 

— 

— 

— 

— 

Pulaski 

20 

Clay,  stone,  sand/gravel 

— 

Clay  products 

Putnam 

83 

Sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Randolph 

4 

Coal,  stone,  crude  oil,  sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Richland 

43 

Crude  oil 

— 

—  . 

Rock  Island 

64 

Stone,  sand/gravel 

— 

— 

St.  Clair 

18 

Stone,  sand/gravel, 
crude  oil,  natural  gas 

Iron-oxide  pigments, 
ground  barite 
Primary  slab  zincd 

Glassd 

Saline 

3 

Coal,  crude  oil,  natural  gas 
sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Sangamon 

52 

Sand/gravel,  crude  oil,  stone 

Iron-oxide  pigments 

— 

Schuyler 

34 

Coal,  crude  oil,  stone 

— 

— 

Scott 

87 

Stone 

— 

— 

Shelby 

85 

Crude  oil,  sand/gravel,  stone 

— 

— 

Stark 

— 

— 

— 

— 

Stephenson 

75 

Stone,  sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Tazewell 

55 

Sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Union 

53 

Stone 

— 

— 

Vermilion 

49 

Stone,  sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Wabash 

10 

Coal,  crude  oil 

— 

— 

Warren 

79 

Stone 

— 

— 

Washington 

13 

Coal,  crude  oil 

— 

— 

Wayne 

24 

Crude  oil 

— 

— 

White 

12 

Coal,  crude  oil,  sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Whiteside 

62 

Peat,  stone,  sand/gravel 

Slag 

— 

Will 

25 

Stone,  sand/gravel 

Sulfur,  expanded  perlite 

Glassd 

Williamson 

14 

Coal,  crude  oil 

— 

— 

Winnebago 

58 

Stone,  sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Woodford 

57 

Sand/gravel 

— 

— 

Undistributed 

Crude  oil 

— 

— 

Sources:  U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines,  Illinois  Department  of  Mines  and  Minerals,  and  Illinois  State  Geological  Survey. 
Because  some  values  are  not  available  by  county,  ranking  cannot  be  exact. 
Stone  production;  1992  data  were  estimated  to  rank  each  county. 
Value  unknown. 


27 


Table  4   Employment  and  wages  in  the  Illinois  mineral  industry,  1991-19923 


1991 

1992 

Industry 

No.  of 

employees 

(1000) 

Average 
weekly 
earnings 

($) 

Average 

hours 

worked/week 

Average 

hourly 

earnings 

($) 

No.  of 

employees 

(1000) 

Average 

weekly 

earnings 

($) 

Average 

hours 

worked/week 

Average 
hourly 

earnings 
($) 

Mining 

19.2 

700.90 

41.4 

16.93 

17.3 

679.39 

39.8 

17.07 

Masonry,  stonework 

16.4 

727.50 

37.5 

19.40 

15.5 

704.32 

35.5 

19.84 

Stone,  clay,  glass 

19.5 

477.60 

40.0 

11.94 

20.0 

485.62 

40.3 

12.05 

Primary  metal  industries 

54.6 

576.58 

42.9 

13.40 

49.1 

583.10 

42.5 

13.72 

Blast  furnaces 

24.0 

589.11 

42.2 

13.96 

20.9 

608.52 

42.2 

14.42 

Iron  and  steel  foundries 

7.9 

642.78 

42.4 

15.16 

6.4 

622.91 

40.9 

15.23 

Petroleum  and  coal  products     10.1 

695.12 

41.9 

16.59 

10.1 

684.75 

41.5 

16.50 

Gas  products  and  distribution     8.2 

683.79 

45.8 

14.93 

8.1 

692.19 

46.3 

14.95 

Total  mineral-related 

159.9 

613.05 

41.8 

14.68 

147.4 

612.21 

41.2 

14.96 

Total  nonagricultural 

5,220.1 

5,234.9 

Goods  producing 

1,165.1 

1,133.5 

Service  producing 

4,055.1 

4,101.4 

Source:  Illinois  Department  of  Labor,  Bureau  of  Employment  Security. 


Table  5   Minerals  consumed  in  Illinois  compared  with  U.S.  consumption,  1 991-1 992a 


1991 

1992 

Illinois  % 

Illinois  % 

of  U.S. 

of  U.S. 

Commodity 

Unit 

U.S. 

Illinois 

consumpton 

U.S. 

Illinois 

consumption 

Fuels 

Coal 

million  tons 

887.7 

34.7 

3.91 

892.3 

31.6 

3.54 

Coke 

million  tons 

24.2 

NA 

— 

Distillate  fuel  oils 

million  bbl 

1,066.0 

36.1 

3.39 

1 ,090.0 

36.4 

3.34 

Gasoline 

million  bbl 

3,168.0 

110.9 

3.50 

3,200.0 

113.9 

3.56 

Kerosene 

million  bbl 

17.0 

0.2 

1.19 

15.0 

0.1 

0.67 

LPG  and  ethane 

million  bbl 

616.0 

14.9 

2.42 

642.0 

12.5 

1.95 

Natural  gas 

trillion  cu  ft 

19.1 

1.0 

5.18 

19.5 

1.0 

5.08 

Residual  fuel  oil 

million  bbl 

423.0 

3.5 

0.82 

401.0 

2.4 

0.60 

Metals 

Pig  iron 

million  tons 

45.8 

2.5 

5.51 

48.1 

2.4 

4.93 

Lead 

thousand  tons 

1,246.3 

71.5 

5.74 

1,240.0 

NA 

— 

Zinc  (slab) 

thousand  tons 

763.8 

116.4 

15.23 

1,005.0 

NA 

— 

Construction  materials 

Air-cooled  slag 

million  tons 

10.9 

— 

— 

Asphalt  and  road  oil 

million  bbl 

162.0 

7.9 

4.89 

166.0 

9.3 

0.06 

Cement 

million  tons 

78.1 

3.3 

4.23 

89.7 

3.6 

4.01 

Sand  and  gravel 

million  tons 

780.3 

26.3 

3.37 

809.1 

28.1 

3.47 

Stone 

million  tons 

1,102.9 

68.6 

6.22 

1,161.5 

72.7 

6.26 

Agricultural  and  chemical  materials 

Feldspar 

thousand  tons 

573.0 

NA 

— 

590.0 

NA 

— 

Fluorspar 

thousand  tons 

483.6 

NA 

— 

365.0 

NA 

— 

Limeb 

thousand  tons 

17,300.0 

779.0 

4.50 

17,887.0 

728.0 

4.07 

Salt 

Evaporated 

thousand  tons 

8,546.0 

489.0 

5.72 

NA 

NA 

— 

Rock 

thousand  tons 

15,586.0 

1 ,530.0 

9.82 

NA 

NA 

— 

a 

b 

NA 


Source:  U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines,  U.S.  Department  of  Energy. 
Excludes  regenerated  lime. 
Not  available. 


28 


Table  6   Fuels  and  energy  consumed  in  Illinois,  1991-19923 

1992 

Change 

1991-1992 
(%) 

Trillion  Btub 

Fuel                                       Units                         1991 

1991ce              1992d 

Coal 

thousand  tons 

34,677 

Natural  gas 

million  ft3 

987,589 

Gasoline 

thousand  bbl 

110,960' 

Kerosene 

thousand  bbl 

203 

Distillate  fuel  oil 

thousand  bbl 

36,149 

Residual  fuel  oil 

thousand  bbl 

3,454 

Liquid  petroleum  gases 

thousand  bbl 

14,539s 

Nuclear  power 

million  kWh 

71,866 

Hydropower 

million  kWh 

70 

TOTAL 

31,612 

993,000 

113,895 

142 

36,377 

2,354 

12,482 

73,742 

69 


Illinois  percentage  of  total  U.S.  energy  consumption 
Percentage  of  total  energy  consumed  in  Illinois 

Coal 

Natural  gas 

Oil  products 

Nuclear  power 

Hydropower 


-8.8 
+0.5 
+2.6 
-30.0 
+0.6 
-31.8 
-14.1 
-2.6 
-1.4 


733.3 

668.3 

1,006.4 

1,001.3 

585.3e 

601.2 

1.2 

0.8 

210.6 

211.9 

21.7 

14.8 

52.5e 

45.2 

771.8 

787.4 

0.7 

0.7 

3,383.5e 

3,331.6 

4.2 


4.1 


21.67 

20.06 

29.75 

30.06 

25.75 

26.23 

22.81 

23.63 

0.02 

0.02 

100.00 

100.00 

Source:  U.S.  Department  of  Energy,  Energy  Information  Administration. 

Fuel  conversion  factors:  gasoline— 5,253,000  Btu/bbl;  kerosene— 5,670,000  Btu/bbl;  distillate  fuel  oil— 5,825,000  Btu/bbl; 

residual  fuel  oil— 6,287,000  Btu/bbl. 

1991  fuel  conversion  factors:  coal— 21,146,000  Btu/ton;  natural  gas— 1,019  Btu/Mcf;  LPG— 3,614,000  Btu/bbl;  nuclear 
power— 10,740  Btu/kWh;  hydropower— 10,352  Btu/kWh. 

1992  fuel  conversion  factors:  coal— 21,142,000  Btu/ton;  natural  gas— 1,018  Btu/Mcf;  LPG— 3,624,000  Btu/bbl;  nuclear 
power— 10,678  Btu/kWh;  hydropower— 10,335  Btu/kWh. 

Revised. 


29 


CO      CO 

P    o 


O 

3 

o 


3 
O 


co 

o 
O 


tr    co 

C 


CD 

II 


(0      05 

.o    o 


CD 
CO 


g5  s 


2  1 


CD 

CO 

CO 

o 

00 

•* 

00 

f 

CM 

T- 

CD 

in 

(O 

CM 

CO 

CM 

CM 

r* 

O 

CM 

r». 

CO 

in 

CD 

in 

in 

CM 

CO 

? 

■* 

rv. 

in 

o 

o 

N 

«t 

W. 

CM 

in 

CO 

CO_ 

CM 

CD 

N 

t_ 

in 

r-~ 

CM 

CM 

in 

CO 

cm" 

00 

co 

m" 

oo" 

cd" 

i— ~ 

cm" 

cm" 

y-? 

r-^ 

f— 

o" 

co" 

oo" 

tv." 

cd" 

CO 

o 

t~- 

o 

(M 

CM 

N 

CO 

CO 

in 

CO 

CO 

CD 

o 

CD 

00 

CD 

N 

t 

o 

CO 

CM_ 

CO 

co_ 

r>»_ 

co_ 

rv. 

T" 

M" 

in 

•* 

m 

CO 

CM 

r- 

S 

i-" 

in" 

a>" 

*— " 

in 

co" 

-r-" 

r«-" 

oo" 

■*" 

'^r 

oo" 

r--" 

o" 

o" 

cm" 

co" 

CD 

<* 

00 

o 

CM 

*"" 

co 

CM 

CO 

*~ 

CD 
CM 

rv. 

o 

CM 

*" 

00 

CO 

in 

m 

CD 

CD 

o 

CO 

in 

CD 
00 

00 

CD 
CM 
00 

5 
•* 

in 

rv 

00 
CM_ 

S 

Ti- 
en 

00 

M- 

CD_ 

in 
in 

CO 

rv. 

CO 
CM_ 

rv. 

00 

o 

o 

CO 

iv. 

o 

00 

o 

CM 
OO 

CD 
CM 
O 

CD 
CM 
OO 

m' 
o 
cq 

in" 
rv. 
o 

iv. 
in 

in" 
o 

co" 

o" 

CO 

oo" 

5 

CM 

co" 
CO 

Tfr" 
CO 
CD 

Iv-" 

o 

CO 

in 

en" 

CM 
CO 

co" 

O) 

■*" 

CD 

r-~" 

00 
00_ 

in" 

CO 

co 

*- 

co" 

N 

co" 

■*" 

*~ 

•sf 

o" 

co" 

N 

cm" 

cm" 

'- 

T_" 

o 

CD 

CD 

>* 

CM 

CD 

oo 

■*- 

LO 

CO" 

o 

CD 

t 

CO 

co 

CM 

CD 

CD 

N 

3 

CM 

CM 

CD 

■3- 

|v. 

o 

00 

O 

cd' 

N 

o" 

co" 

cd" 

in 

o 

■* 

CM 

CO 

o 

00 

in 

CD 

-  -    I 


o 

CD 


CD 

o" 

CD 


CM        i-        CO        t- 


in  I"  T-  T-  7- 


I    I 


i-  o 

CD  O 

CM  CD 

f"  in" 

r~»  ■* 

•<t  in 


<tf 

T- 

CO 

o 

CO 

N 

CD 

IV. 

CD 

co 

in 

CM 

CD 

(D_ 

o 

cm" 

o" 

co" 

yS 

N." 

o 

CO 

** 

in 

co 

•« 

rv 

1- 

7- 

CD 

CO        •>-        t- 


CM 

(v. 
CM 
(v. 

in 

CM_ 

CD 

in 

o 

CD 
CD 

oo" 

|v. 
CM 

oo" 
in 

CD 
tJ- 

cm" 

■*" 

T-" 

co" 

CD 

y- 

** 

in 

f 

T— 

t~- 

^— 

co" 

r-" 

CD 

** 

CD 

in 

co 

00 

rv 

CO        CM        1-        CO        t- 


co 
N 

CD 

rv 

o 

co" 

CM 

cd" 

CD 

^r 

in 

oo 

r^- 

r- 

K 

N 

CM 

CD 

00 

o 

o 

■<!- 

CO 

in 

o 

CO 

t 

h~ 

r^ 

00 

■* 

CD 

CO 

CO 

CO 

00 

CM 

in 

in 

co 

00 

°° 

N 

in 

CM_ 

CD 

*— 

CO 

"* 

N 

o 

00 

o 

h» 

iri 

in 

K 

o 

o" 

oo" 

T— " 

< 

N-" 

K 

CO 

■<*■" 

h-" 

co" 

co" 

o 

r- 

i^ 

oo 

CO 

t 

I" 

1^ 

o 

CD 

T— 

CD 

00 

T— 

CD 

CD 

o 

in 

o 

m- 

^~ 

CM 

in 

in 

CD 

en 

^~ 

°°. 

CM 

^r 

T-~ 

co" 

K 

co" 

■*" 

,- 

"♦ 

cm" 

in 

CO" 

cm" 

cm" 

"- 

o 

O 

o 

O 

o 

o 

O 

CO 

CO 

CO 

1^ 

CM 

00 

CD 

00 

in 

'^• 

v- 

o 

m 

o 

CM 

in 

CD 

■* 

CM 

h~ 

in 

CM 

■<!- 

OO 

CO 

CD 

in 

m 

CM 

o 

CD 

CO 

■»— 

O 

°i 

CM_ 

in 

o> 

O) 

CM 

CD 

00 

CO 

00 

in 

r^ 

CD 

m' 

■*" 

co" 

o" 

co" 

CD" 

-r-" 

-r-" 

,— ~ 

cm" 

,— ~ 

■*" 

oo" 

cd" 

■*" 

in" 

oo" 

CO 

CO" 

N 

CO 

00 

■* 

t 

o 

■* 

h- 

CO 

CO 

r-» 

in 

CO 

CO 

CM 

o 

o 

co 

r^ 

■* 

1- 

00_ 

00 

co_ 

CD 

■* 

•* 

00 

CM 

o 

CM 

T— 

CM_ 

in 

o 

r«." 

o" 

N 

m" 

co" 

■r-" 

■r-" 

T-~ 

oo" 

T-" 

co" 

cd" 

•*" 

oo" 

in" 

co" 

cd" 

co" 

cm" 

CD 

h- 

,_ 

r>- 

,— 

CD 

CM 

■* 

CD 

T_ 

00 
CM 

r- 

CM 
CM 

,— 

o 

in 

■sa- 

r~- 

o 

o 

-* 

CM 

CM 

T— 

■j— 

h- 

in 

CD 

M- 

o 

1^ 

M- 

CO 

■* 

o 

o 

CM 

in 

N 

CD 

00 

00 

CO 

CM 

CM 

m- 

in 

N 

CM 

(^ 

CO 

rv. 

o 

■«t 

CD 

r- 

in 

r--_ 

CM 

[*-_ 

|v-_ 

CM_ 

o 

in 

1- 

T 

o 

o 

CM_ 

y— 

oo 

co 

m 

in 

o" 

co" 

cd" 

■*}•" 

cd" 

oo" 

oo" 

v—" 

cm" 

co" 

■*" 

,-" 

iv." 

T-" 

o" 

co" 

co" 

m" 

CD 

CO 

CM 

00 

h- 

CO 

r- 

in 

CO 

o 

o 

Tf 

CO 

OO 

CO 

CD 

CO 

CO 

■*!■_ 

CO 

T- 

•* 

CM 

CM 

•* 

M" 

•«»• 

■*— 

CO 

CD 

CO 

|v- 

°l 

r-» 

in 

o 

cm" 

cm" 

co" 

co" 

■st" 

'" 

co" 

o" 

CD" 

!>-." 

co" 

T~ 

T_ 

cm" 

o" 

CD 

rv 

CM 

eo 

CD 

| 

| 

1 

CO 

O 

■*" 

co" 

00 

o 

•<1- 

CD 

cm" 

iri 

1 

o 

o 

m 

CO 

N 

o 

|v- 

in 

CM 

*— 

00 

o> 

ot 

yS 

o" 

co" 

oo" 

cm" 

00 

CO 

o 

CO 

s 

°l 

rv 

T— 

1- 

CO 

T~ 

*" 

CD  T-  T-  T-  T-  ^ 


c 

CO 

c 

10 

CO 

c 

0) 

o 
c 

CO 

o 

c 
CO 

o 

b 

Q 

LL 

c    '-g     ^ 

O        J2         CD 

u.     O     -^ 


^ 

CD 

D 

£ 

^_ 

O 

CI 

CD 

o 

Q 

£ 

o 

T5 

c 

CD 

3 

o 

cu 

CO 

"CO 

O 

s 

Q. 

ec 

en 

CO 

■C 
CO 

CO 
jQ 

TO 


5 


§    5    5 


O    •£* 


CD 

CD 

C 

-C 

*- 

CD 

c 

CD 

"D 

C 

CD 

? 

O 

CO 

_>- 

Q. 

c 

3 

tr 
o 

c 
o 

O 
Q 

Q. 

o 

CD 

CD 

3 

JZ 

tr 

T3 

*"* 

O 

c 

CO 

CO 

O. 

T3 

o 

Ejj 

CD 

„ 

O 

o 

ro 

CM 

O 

3 
•Q 

O 

Q. 

o 
O 

CD 
CD 

c 
o 
E 

"co 

3 

O 

CO 

« 

C 

CD 

CD 

C 

C 

C 

C/) 

C 

< 

o 

CO 

in 

CD 

C 

ui 

CD 

-a 
c 
co 

c 

3 

co 
CD 

c 

CD 
CM 

c/> 

3 
O 

O 

CD 

O 
C 

2 

X3 

CD 

C 

T3 

•o 

C 

CO 

E 

"co 

c 

CD 

c 

o 

CO 

CO- 

co 

cp 

CD 

00 
CD 

c 

5 

OJ 

CD 

O 

c 
o 

c" 

•a 

c 

CO 

c 
o 

CO 

T3 

c 
a 

CO 

o 

C 

o 

co 

E 

01 
3 

c 

CD 

E 
tr 

CO 
Q. 

Cfl 

a 

(0 

en 

CO 

00 

c 

(J 

i 

CJ 
CD' 
13 

CM 
(jO 

o 

o 

c 
5 

CD 

n_ 

c 

c 

o 

Q 

O 

p 

o 

JC 

bO 

CD 

CD 
CO 

o 

o 
c 

o 

c 

3 

S 

c 

CD 
> 

CD 

CD 

2 

E 

CO 

£ 

£ 

o 

c 

^J 

^j 

*- 

o 

CO 

CO 

CO 

a 

t- 

** 

•a 

TO 

3 

o-i 

CO 

2 

CD 

-d 

CO 

-D 

CO 

CO 

CO 

3 

0) 

D) 

to 

CD 
CL 

CD 

a 

O 

c 
o 

=! 

0 

o 

C 

o 

CO 

CD 

>- 

co 

c 

C 

CO 

o 

3 

o 

CD 

E 

E 

E 

X5 
O 

D 
CO 

CD 

C 

c 

CO 

a 

0. 

> 

O 

o 

Q 

30 


Table  8  Coal  production  in  Illinois  counties,  1 833-1 992a 


Cumulative  tota 

I           Cumulative  total 

Cumulative  total 

Cumulative  total 

surface  production              production 

surface  production 

production 

County 

(tons) 

(tons) 

County 

(tons) 

(tons) 

Adams 

338,147 

341 ,924 

Macoupin 

— 

337,161,705 

Bond 

— 

7,355,569 

Madison 

37,843 

164,295,772 

Brown 

41,761 

74,068 

Marion 

— 

39,247,722 

Bureau 

1 1 ,094,808 

53,823,055 

Marshall 

4,779 

12,516,141 

Calhoun 

— 

96,247 

McDonough 

4,961,066 

7,569,547 

Cass 

— 

212,477 

McLean 



5,544,139 

Christian 

— 

355,957,930 

Menard 

— 

13,462,005 

Clark 

4,482 

4,482 

Mercer 

67,080 

15,519,862 

Clay 

801 

801 

Monroe 

— 

8,284 

Clinton 

— 

76,562,194 

Montgomery 

— 

141,824,660 

Coles 

— 

210,930 

Morgan 

13,564 

190,787 

Crawford 

17,315 

45,400 

Moultrie 

— 

2,032,236 

Douglas 

— 

44,397,202 

Peoria 

32,702,938 

96,718,740 

Edgar 

1,587,442 

2,295,898 

Perry 

387,332,001 

491,175,248 

Effingham 

— 

796 

Pike 

2,224 

5,081 

Franklin 

— 

701 ,374,664 

Pope 

34,704 

36,266 

Fulton 

240,41 1 ,533 

317,006,919 

Putnam 

— 

10,071,893 

Gallatin 

11,191,409 

53,355,553 

Randolph 

103,711,596 

237,318,163 

Greene 

71,090 

693,191 

Richland 

35 

154 

Grundy 

1 ,635,422 

40,872,430 

Rock  Island 

— 

3,846,169 

Hamilton 

— 

6,172,927 

St.  Clair 

116,444,567 

367,370,806 

Hancock 

459,329 

771,281 

Saline 

65,006,743 

319,815,712 

Hardin 

— 

40 

Sangamon 

— 

233,449,607 

Henry 

9,065,783 

22,910,053 

Schuyler 

1 1 ,048,655 

12,752,071 

Jackson 

60,531,911 

128,204,823 

Scott 

3,790 

612,476 

Jasper 

— 

23,739 

Shelby 

925 

4,119,763 

Jefferson 

5,353,358 

166,256,683 

Stark 

8,342,056 

9,569,336 

Jersey 

2,290 

120,350 

Tazewell 

— 

17,633,802 

Johnson 

72,781 

314,325 

Vermilion 

30,651,670 

165,878,433 

Kankakee 

18,284,342 

19,192,105 

Wabash 

12,082 

44,394,114 

Knox 

62,601,174 

65,896,605 

Warren 

132 

685,466 

La  Salle 

2,345,878 

65,547,638 

Washington 

— 

37,271,317 

Livingston 

139,091 

10,111,437 

White 

— 

14,075,328 

Logan 

— 

25,088,376 

Will 

29,333,708 

37,553,733 

Macon 

— 

1 1 ,000,468 

Williamson 

106,545,871 

463,856,056 

Woodford 

— 

7,810,160 

Total  cumulative 

surface 

Estimated  production, 

production, 

all  counties, 

1911-1992 

1,321,508,176 

1833-1881 

73,386,123 

Total  cumulative 

Total  cumulative 

production, 

production, 

1882-1992 

5,491,685,332 

1833-1992 

5,565,071,455 

Source:  Illinois  State  Department  of  Mines  and  Minerals,  Annual  Coal,  Oil  and  Gas  Reports.  This  table  was  revised  to  place 
production  in  the  county  where  the  tipple  is  located. 


31 


Table  9   Employment  and  production  by  method  of  coal  mining  in  Illinois,  1981-19923 


Underground 

Surface 

Average 

Average  no. 

Average 

Average  no. 

No.  of 

No.  of 

production/ 

employees/ 

No.  of 

No.  of 

production/ 

employees/ 

Year 

mines 

employees 

mine  (tons) 

mine 

mines 

employees 

mine  (tons) 

mine 

1981 

31 

13,351 

943,081 

431 

27 

4,797 

835,672 

178 

1982 

32 

10,554 

1,115,121 

330 

28 

4,397 

919,439 

157 

1983 

31 

10,514 

1 ,076,464 

339 

23 

4,245 

1 ,087,096 

185 

1984 

31 

10,857 

1,288,564 

350 

21 

3,946 

1 ,206,843 

188 

1985 

32 

11,386 

1 ,207,769 

356 

20 

3,445 

1,091,432 

172 

1986 

31 

10,379 

1,320,375 

335 

20 

3,170 

1,115,084 

159 

1987 

28 

9,263 

1,399,588 

331 

19 

2,925 

1,135,416 

154 

1988 

27 

8,830 

1,477,178 

327 

16 

2,684 

1 ,248,037 

168 

1989 

27 

8,729 

1,501,026 

323 

15 

2,376 

1 ,306,890 

158 

1990 

26 

7,740 

1 ,654,275 

298 

16 

2,389 

1,165,371 

149 

1991 

29 

7,844 

1,521,809 

270 

15 

1,823 

1 ,060,204 

122 

1992 

27 

7,490 

1,758,658 

277 

12 

1,442 

1 ,070,673 

120 

Source:  Illinois  Department  of  Mines  and  Minerals,  Annual  Coal,  Oil  and  Gas  Report. 


32 


CM 
CD 
CD 


eg 
cd 


c 
co 
o. 

E 
o 
o 


3 

D. 
75 

o 
O 


n 


g 

*! 

CD 


CO    o 

3't} 


o  <2 
o  c- 


il.  ~o 
CD    £. 

c  2 
3  o> 


co 

CD 

if 

0) 


Co   o 

§'•§ 

2? 


o  ^- 


CD 
o 

CO 

■c 
co 

CD    C 

c  p 

3   O) 


CD   00   O   CO   CM 

00 

00   00   CO   CO 

Oi-NNIO 

T-    O 

CO  o 

co  co  t---  *-  co 

3 

CD  CD  m  h- 

CM   O   ^-   CM   CO 

m  c\j 

r-*. 

CM   CO   00   00   t 

00 

CD  IT)  CM  CO 

CM   CO   CM   r-   i- 

<JJ    T       - 


00  ^   i-  N  N 


00 

00   CM   t-   CO 

o  r~  r~  o  o 

WCJ  0)0)0 

t   T- 
O   CD 

00 

CD   CD   CO   CM 

r^^r^^   fj 

t^   O 

■"fr   i-   CD   CD   1^ 

CO  t-  CM  CM  i- 

CO 

o  en  t  w 

CD   CD   CM   CO 

co  co  oo  in 

h-  CM  r-  CM  CD 
00  0)(D  S  »- 
CM_  r-m  ("»_  in   C0_ 

CO   3 

O  t- 

829 
628 

o"  N-"  r-T  cm"  m" 

CD  OJ  in  CD  CO 

o  ■*  cd  in  •* 

in 

CO 

en 

co"  co"  t*-"  o" 

CM   CD  00   I" 

i-  r-  oo  ■* 

co"  fC  cd"  |vT  t>-." 

^  N  CO  ^  O 

r-_  in  i-_  t-_  cm 

cd"  co" 

CM  CD 
CD  CO 

in  ti- 

O  CM 

Is  co"  co"  ^r"  •*" 

•*" 

■*"  CO"  ■r-"  1-" 

T-"  CM"  i-  i-  t- 

r-~  ■*       co  cm 

CD  O  i-  CO     I 

do       d  cd 


^t-  co 
i-~  cm    . 
co  ■*    I 
o"t-" 

CO   CD 


O   i-   CM   l-   CM 


in  •*  r-  y-  o 


i-  CM  CO  in  CD 


t-  O  O  i- 


Bl-T-T- 


N00OCM 


o  o  o  o  o 


T-    f-        I       T-     O  T-    O 


,-  CM  *-  *-  t-  O  O     I     O  --  O  *- 


CM 
CO 

cd 


o 
o 


CO 
CM 
CO 


CM 


tj-  cd  co  in  r- 


CD  CD  CM  •* 

T— 

T- 

CM   CO   CO   N 

CD  CO  CO  h-  CO 

in  co  co  cd 

m 

m 

cm  Is*  in  co 

in  cm  m  cm  t- 

m  r~-  co  oo 

in 

CO 

r~-  in  cm  co 

CM  CM  CM  i-  t- 

IBIS       I       Sr-  OOl 

y-   t-  r-  CM  CM  r-     ' 


CM  CO  1-^  CO  CD  COi-O 

in  in  ^t  oo  i-  in 


T-    Tf    CD   o    i- 
■<t   h-   ■*   CM   "*■ 

cd  iri  d  d  cd 


■*  CO  ■*  in  t- 

m  oo  t-  oo  co 
cm  t-- ^  a>  cq 
Tf"  t-"  oo"  t-*  in" 
in  in  cd  cm  ■* 
00  *fr  cm_  r-_  o_ 
en"  en"  co"  cd"  in" 


O  y-  CM  y-  CM 


t~-  ■*  i-   i-  O 


CD 
CO 

CON  0)0 

o  oo  oo  in 

CO   -tf   CO   •*   CD 

*NOOt 

f- 

co  in  CM  CM 

CM  CM  CM  i-  i- 

i-  o  o  o  o 


CM 
O 

h-  o  o  in 

CD  O  y-  y- 
t^  CM  00  CD_ 

m  co  in  s  in 
■*  m  ■<*••<*■  co 
CM  -r-  oo_  ■*  o>_ 

CO   O   f^    y~   CM 
CO  O  CO  o>  CO 
O  (O  O)  CM_  CM_ 

CO 

in 

CO 

O 
CD 

t" 
CO 

cd"  in"  co"  d 

i-  CM  CO  o 

(D  in  s  in 

oo"  co"  r*»"  co"  ^-" 

ict  nooi 

■tf  C0_  CM_  y-_  00 

K  in"  co"  *r"  K 

co  in  in  i- 

co" 

CD 

in 

yf 

co"  CO"  T-"  T-" 

T-^  1-"  i-^"  1-" 

CM  O  O  y- 


CO  y-  y-  y- 


CO 

o 

o 

n 
CO 
O 

O 

CO 

o 

c 
o 

O 

o 

ai 

CO 

o 

c 

c 

s 

O 

., 

CD 

O 

o 

x 

o 

CD 
T3 

-O 
CO 

c 
o 

< 

2 

o 

OCLO<< 

_i   o 

lillij 

2  u.       id  s  co 


o  o  o  o  o 


O  CO 

o  >>  o 
£  O 

g5  CO   Q.  Q. 


^i-^-i-O  r-Oi- 


O  O  O  O  y- 


=  00™ 

CD  •£  CO  <0 

-  c    3  u  ra 

3    ^    C  C  3 

H  O  CD  <  CO 


•£5    «)    ffl 


■£    CO 

50 

■g  cd 
CO  -o 

IE  f0 
I > 


CD 

C 

•i  Ss 

|o>, 

5    CD  ^ 

^m  « 
'«  cor 

3   -rj    <0 

o-~  o 

iu50 


CD 

?i 


x  E  S 
p    CO    o 

o3£  g 
jc  o  .9- 

CL  CO  0. 


r-  cm  co  ■*  m 


1-  cm  co  ■*  m 


(D  N  00  0)0  T-CMCO 

T-1-1-1-CM  CMCMCM 


CO 
O 

O 

c 

CO 

CD 

■D 

O 

t^ 

CO 

CD 

■0 

CO_ 

c 

cd" 

3 

~  "O 

■C   CO 

0  -c 

Q-  0 

CD    Q. 

(Z    CD 

CO      ;. 

O 

0  0 

O 

"O    CO 

d 
0 

CO    CO 

~     U) 

O  3> 

c 

i'E 

0  . 

in 

O    CO 

in 

75  -s 

3    CD 

in" 

C   N 

CO 

C    w 

0 

<    CO 

0" 

.  E 

CO 

co  E 

loo 

lo 

£  CD 

in 

2   CD 

y— 

T3    _ 

C   .S 

CO   _ 

CD 

CO    S 

c?c3 

CM 

2  g 

0  m 

*-   XJ 

cBO 

E-o 

■C    CD 

CO     CO 

a.  co 

CO  JC 

Q  2 

_l 

.52  g. 

< 

0  _ 

1- 

C    CO 

O 

=  0 

H 

-  0 

CO    >- 

O    CO 

3  .5? 

O    CO 

CO  N 

33 


TJ 

3 

c 

0 

CO 

CI) 

CO 

f 

c 

O 

ni 

Q. 

o 

cu 

r 

n 
co 
a> 

O 

m 

en 

u 

U) 

o 

O 

ii 

<i> 

O 

CJ 

r 

£ 
o 

■o 
cd 
a. 
a. 


en 
o 
O 


-D 


c   ° 
g  8 


cc 
'-c 


rr 

CO 

m 

(n 

sz 

CD 

o 

C 

C 

5 

*=r 

■n 

cc 

o 
O 


^t  K  m  o>  ••- 

<J  O)  CD  00  O 

co  o  s  Tf  in 

cm"  CO  ^r"  cm"  cm" 

m  i/i  ui  in  io 


co  *-  i-  to  in 

o  ^  n  oi  m 
m  in  •-  cc  in 


cm  »-  »-  cj>  co  Tt  in  n 

N  >-  CM  CO  W  Ol    CM  ffl 

co  o>  q  cm  o)  ^-  t- 

rr  ^"  CD  U3  ^" 


m  i-  r-~  o  in 

co  s  co  in  <- 
cm  <t  co  co  co 


r-~  r-^  a>  o  co 

ffl    --    ffl    CM    CM 
*-    CM    t-    CM    CM 


o  o  co  t-  m 

r--  *-  co  m  «- 

cm  m  co  r--.  cm 

■<*"  co"  co"  co'  TJ-" 


S  If)  CD  N  (O 

CO  O  CO  CM  CO 

in  o  cm  co  o 

cm"  cm"  cm"  cm"  cm" 


I  I  I 


r-  co  o  in  cm 

in  co  >-  co  ffl 

ffl  r-_  CM  »-_  CM 

cm"  <*•"  in"  in"  in" 


r-  in  ffl  t-  rt 

is  in  >-  t-  co 

n  q  o  co  f 

ffl"  a>"  a>"  co"  o" 


id  f  n  in  s 
co  cm  in  •- 
—   ■*   t 


I      I     I 


I     I      I     I  III 


O  O  CD  CO  CM 
CM  f  CM  (M  O 
i-    t-    ,-    CM    CM 


I        I        I        I 


>-  S  CO  r-  CO 

r~-  t  oo  o  t- 

00  CM_  ^_  00  ffl 

r--"  oo"  ffl"  oo"  oo"         -r-   t- 


•-  CJ)    CM  O)  >- 

S  O    CO  ID  S 

C0_  »- ■_■*-_  00  CJ) 

cm"  co"  cm"  t-~  o" 


i-~  cm  o  r^  o 

i-  N  ^  O  CO 

CM  O  CO  ■*  -r- 

CM"  CM"  -r-"  ^-"  T-" 


t  cd  s  cd  in 

»-    l-    CO    ffl    LO 
■q-    i-    CD    CD    in 


0)       0)        0)       <D 


in  co   in   ^r   ^r 

f    CM    LO    t-    00 

CM    t-     *- 


co  in  *-  ffl  en 

CM    TT    LO    CO    t- 


O       ffl       ffl       ^       7~ 

^  i-  n  in  s 

N    CD    S    CD    in 


co  o  f-  i-  in 

t-  ffl  cm  in  ^t 

CO    CM    CM 


"D       D     O     B     D 
»-     ■*    CM  CO  T- 

o  cd  ffl  in  t- 

ffl_  ■*  in  in  ffl 

00"  ffl"  o"  oo"  oo" 

in  m  co  in  m 


o  co  o  r^  r^ 

m  in  o  oo  co 

CM  If)  N  N  t- 

r-»"  r--"  oo"  oo"  oo" 


T)  D     T)     T)     T3 

■*  00  CM  i-  CD 

ffl  00  ^  1-^  *i- 

■*  ^-   ^T  CM  CM 


tJ-  ffl  CD  00  f 

o  t-  co  in  ffl 

*-_  cq  co_  co  ■f 

co"  ■*"  in"  in  in" 


i-  in  ffl  i-  rf 

ffl  LO  i-  t-  00 

r>~._  q  q  co  t 

ffl  ffl  ffl  co"  o" 


co  ■*  co  in  r^ 

co  cm  in  t- 

T-      Tf     Tf 


co  oo  i-  m  m 

o  o  r^  00  ffl 

in  in  in  t-  in 

ffl  ffl   O  ffl"  ffl 


CO  CD  SMO 

in  in  co  co  cm 

CO_  fflOCDCO 

co"  co"  co"  cm"  »-" 


O  CM  CM  CO  ID 

CO  CD  CBNS 

in  co  in  •*  i- 

cm"  cm"  t-*  T-"  t-" 


I  I  I  I 


CO  ffl  CM  N  t- 
LO  LO  CO  CD  CD 
O    CO    O    CD    N. 


O  O  O  ■*»•  CM 
CD  ffl  O  O  ffl 
CM    CM    CO    CO    CM 


r-~  ffl  cm  >-  co 

r-  -t  co  r^  in 

CO  CD  CO  ffl  O 

CM"  T-"    T-"  T^ 


if) 

CD- 

CD 

CO 

CO 

■= 

CD 

ffl 

o 

,_ 

C\J 

CD 

3 

CO 

CO 

ffl 

ffl 

ffl 

"O 

u 

ffl 

ffl 

ffl 

ffl 

ffl 

C 

y~ 

•— 

T~ 

*— 

T- 

CO 

u 
CD 

CD 
it 

o 

LU 

O 

00  ffl  O  i-  CM 
00  00  ffl  ffl  ffl 
ffl    ffl    ffl    ffl    ffl 


CO 
CD 
TJ 

co 

Q) 
fX 


CO  ffl  O  t-  CM 
00  00  ffl  ffl  ffl 
ffl    ffl    ffl    ffl    ffl 


00  ffl  O  r-  CM 
00  00  ffl  ffl  ffl 
ffl    ffl    ffl    ffl    ffl 


OO  ffl  O  I-  CM 
OO  00  ffl  ffl  ffl 
ffl    ffl  ffl  ffl  ffl 


s 

o 


I 
ffl 

00 

ffl 


to 


5*. 

>  ffl 

>•  ffl 

CO        T- 

CD    ffl 

a.  en 


0)    ^     10 
^  ffl        O 


co        2 


o 
ffl 
ffl 


CO 

ri 

o 
o 
o 


CO    ffl 


1—   ffl 


-  o 

i=   ffl  ffl  _; 

U    00  ffl  co 

CD    ffl  »-  CM 


LU 


■_-  00 

«  s 

0)    ffl 


ffl 

10     ffl 

CD  "— ' 
CO  >> 
3     CD 

sz  co 
«l 

CO     ~ 


CO  CO 

°     § 

sz        ■** 

■!=;       o 

o 
o 
o" 
co 
ffl 

00 

ffl 


o 


T5"0  o 

O    ^  ^     CD 

O  o>  5  2 

—   oo  ^_     . 

o  ffl  cm  „r- 


CM 

"~-  ffl   . 
oo   ffl   ffl 

oo   r- 

^  ffl 
m    0> 


ffl 


a 


co 
cc 

ffl 


en 


CO    CM     $    ffl 

C    ffl     ■-     '- 

E  o> 

15 


<  I 

ffl    ^-     00    , CO 

ffl  —  oo  O    a) 


»-     m     ffl 


|i 

o  s 


00 

00 

-  cm  — ;  ~" 

C    ffl  ,-     3 

O   ffl  ffl     o 


3      I      ^ 


I 

co 
_  co 
co  2 
g   ^ffl 


CO 


CD    ~ 


O  CD 

r-      O  !» 

"^  ^^  «0 

o  <-> 

ffl  s 

ffl  -Q 

^  c 

o>  I 

.E  x: 

E  "> 

o  _co 

^  CO 

>  o 


a>.<2 

J2  CM 

C  -•  ffl 

LU  cm"  °> 

■^  o>  V 

°  ?  CJ 

c  i  2? 

CD  00  °>    — i 

E  oo  "~  % 

■r1  ffl       -  2; 

5  il  oo  ffl 

co  . — •  co   ffl 

°-  ™  ffl    y~ 

<°  ?  *-    1 

Q  E  —  6 


co 


co 
.a 
CO 
3  5= 

00 

CD    a) 
CJ    T3 

If 


en  2 

co  ffl 

co  j- 

c  *-" 

CO  JC 

^  o 

oo  > 

00  * 

ffl  aj 


CD 

o 

c  ni 

•ii  ffl 

O  T" 

o  c 

o  — 

CM  CO 


ffl    H 

""  o 
c  o 

—    o 

&*■ 

CD  "D 
>-  C 
O     CO 

«>     &> 

c  ,g> 

O  CD 
O    £ 

Ib 

r^  o 

oo  — 

^  o 

■  ■  o 

6  °- 

c    ■- 

E  s 

3  ffl 
CO    »- 

§  £ 
o 

>«« 

is 

M    8 
2    §     CO 
•°    00     C 

Q  -o  2 
■g    c   in 

5     O)    c 
CO      CD      CO 

c    o  £ 

CD    "- 

E    g   o? 

.9-  o  .2 

CO  O  >, 

CJ  o  - 

"5  ffl  c 

2  in  o 

O    CM     3 
£    -    O 


34 


s  IB  .<2 

o  c  5 

o  E  g 

a  g  = 

o  §  g 

I—  o 


TO 

« 

>> 


c 

c 
CD 
CL 


c 

£  -r,    ra 
m  ^    c 

o         to 
"5  « 


01 

(0 

TO 

to 

r 

a> 

o 

(1) 

in 

o 

a> 

to 

5 

c= 

J) 

to"  "5 

p  1  s 


il 


|  >  1    c 

«  if  s 

co 


E  to  £  « 

j2  "c  a>  .£ 

n  is  r  p 

CO  >  t  .1= 

0)  >,  o  > 

-  co  c  .„ 

o  c  T,  o> 

Z  c  £  a> 


CM 
CD 

(0 

O) 

to 

*— 

ol> 

c 

00 

—~ 

en 

*~ 

to 

O 

E   .* 

c 

*=•      3 

<o   ■= 

Q)     c 

_c 

S 

E 

3 

(0 

c 

to 

8 

o 

to 

= 

8 

o 

to 

to 

o 

>- 

3 

o 

co 

to 

a> 

E 

3 
</> 

C 

o 
O 


oo  cm  Oi  i-  r~- 

o  oi  n  n  o 

°l  *"1  °l  °°.  "1 

co"  in"  co  to"  in" 

CM    CM    CM  CM   CM 


CO    Tf    CO    CM    CO 
O    t-    £-    CO   CO 


■<*  f- 


m  co 


to  to  in  s  n 

lO    CD    CO    LO    00 
CM    CM   CM   CM   CM 


t-  CO  CO 
y-  *-  00 
CO    O)    T 


O    CO 
CO    h- 


I        I        I        I  I        I        I        I       I  "Il 


■<*■   CM   CO   ■>*■   CO 


o   00    T}-    00    CO 


CM   CO   i-  i-   CO 

00    l-    CO  CO    00 

t»  »-_  rr  O   i-; 

cm"  o"  cm"  co"  t-" 

co  co  co  cO  co 


i-  o  in  1-  oo 


CD    O  i-    CO    CO 

m»  m  o  i- 

00    00  CO    CM    O 

co"  cm"  cm"  co"  co" 


n  in  w  oo  'j- 

s  in  to  to  co 

f«-_  in  to_  o_  r-m 

*i  co"  co"  ■*"  in" 


I  I     I     I     I     I  I-     I     I     I 


I     I     I 


CO    CO   CM 

O)    O)   t- 


co  o  ■>-  co  co 

so  in  o  i- 

00_  CX>   CO   CM_  o_ 

co"  cm"  cm"  co"  co" 


!^  in  to  ^r  op 

oo 
■*  co  co  tj-"  m 


I     I     I     I     I  I     I     I     I     I  I     I     I     I     I 


I     I 


-    I     I 


o  co  co  oo  o 

CO    i-    CM    O   00 

co  Is-  oo  o  in 


CM    00   CO    t 

i-  oo  •<*  in 
co  cm  in  •>! 


I"-    O    t-    y- 
CO 


oi  in  o)  oi  s 
in  oi  i-  h-  co 
to  co  CO  co  CM 


COLT 


fflO)   N  ^ 

O   CM   00  t*    CM 

cq  ■*  co_  t»  in 

co"  co"  co"  co"  co" 


I  M   I 


I       I   I   I  m  I      5 


f-.    O)    CO    »- 

CM  CM   't  in  N 


CM   CO   S  CD   N 


O  CM    CM    CO   00 

in  i-oiooo 

t-  O   00   f-    00 

T-"  CM"    T-"    T-" 


CM    t-    T-    CO   O 

o  t-  o)  co  in 

•r-    T-    00    T- 


CM  i-  t-    O)  CO 

r*»  *-  cm  co  in 

CO  O)  O    CM  CD 

■<r"  Tt  to"  CO"  rf" 


I     CM      I  5    CM    CO   CO    r- 


I  I  I  I  I 


N  N  ffl  O  CO 
CD  y-  O)  CM  CM 
t-    CM    t-   CM    CM 


r-  3  to  o  co 

Sco  cm  oo  a> 
CM    't    *t    i- 


s  co  in  3  in 

00    CO    O    O    CO 
CO    CM    CO    CO    y- 


N  in   CD  S   CO 

00  O    00  CM    00 

in  o  cm  cq  o> 

cm"  cm"  cm"  cm"  cm" 


i-  in  co  oo  r- 

•<*  f-    h»    CD  CM 

00  CM    CO    CO  O 

*-"  cm"  cm"  t-"  *-" 


to  o  ■>*  o  ■* 

O)    N    CM    N    i- 
•<T    CO   CM    ■<*■    CM 


O  00  O  I*-    h~ 

in  in  o  oo  co 

cm_  in  h-_  r>._  *-m 

N  N  CO  CO    CO 


c 
J9 
a. 
to 
to 

CJ> 


3    00 

CJ    X 

■£    O) 


CDO»-CMy00CDOi-CM<000CT>O»-CM  CO    O)    O    i-    CM  00    O)    O    i-    N 

00O)O)O)     bCOCOO)0)Cn,OCOCOO)0)0)  00    00    0)    O)    O)  00    CO    O)    O)    O) 

CDOO)0)uO)0)0)0)0).=    0)0)0)0)0)COcDO)0)0)0)  0)0)0)0)0) 


2 

CD 


<5 

'c 


CO 

"c 


.5   co" 

C     CO 


il 

^  o 

b  -d 

—    c 
to    CO 


CO 

c 
o 
to 

x:  co 
o   a> 

z  •- 

#i 

C     C0 

co  ^: 
*  O 

E  — " 
aj  3 
w  2 

S  s 
to-s 


S  g 

O  to 

-  ^ 

co  . 


E 
o 


o 

CC 

Q 


3 

o 
en 


X 

CO 

2 

? 

CD 

Z 

co 

c 

o 

o 

-* 

m 

co 

r 

O 

r 

03 


O)  — ' 

ai  to 

*-   to 
o      . 


g    CO 

t:  cm" 
co     - 

a.  y~ 
£  to 


SlSii 


5  | 


.  c 

.C  O) 

CO  CD 

4  g 

2  to 

o  c 

o  o 

O  2 


CO 

< 

*~ 

in 

■n 

T 

X) 

r 

CD 

CO 

>* 

h~ 

tn 

en 

o 

o 

y-    CO 
CM   -^ 

CD    i5 

::<  co 

13  c 

C    CO    o 
C0    CM    ^ 

.-TJO 

r-   c  o 

"*   «m 

CO   CM     £ 
i-    CM     CO 


Z) 

Q 

Q 

a 

Q 

Q 

<n 

(n 

m 

in 

<n 

01 

(1) 

(1) 

Q> 

a) 

a> 

Q) 

<) 

T) 

T) 

T) 

T) 

□ 

3 

o 

3 

3 

j 

J 

3 

o 

C) 

C3 

o 

O 

co 

c 

c 

e 

c_ 

c 

35 


Table  13   Crude  oil  production  in  Illinois  counties,  1888-1992;  value  for  1991  and  1992a 


1888-1992 

1991 

1992 

cumulative 

%  of  total 

%  of  total 

1991-1992 

production 

Production 

Illinois 

Valued 

Production 

Illinois 

Valued 

production 

County 

(1000  bbl) 

(1000  bbl) 

production 

($1000) 

(1000  bbl) 

production 

($1000) 

%  change 

Adams 

292 

5 

0.0 

101 

3 

0.0 

53 

-4.7 

Bond 

8,311 

63 

0.3 

1,273 

61 

0.3 

1,171 

-3.5 

Brown 

2,191 

37 

0.2 

755 

35 

0.2 

682 

-5.3 

Champaign 

7 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

Christian 

30,741 

256 

1.3 

5,159 

251 

1.3 

4,832 

-1.8 

Clark-Cumberland 

95,277 

265 

1.4 

5,351 

299 

1.6 

5,761 

+12.9 

Clay 

151,437 

917 

4.8 

18,510 

880 

4.6 

16,944 

-4.0 

Clinton 

88,904 

215 

1.1 

4,343 

229 

1.2 

4,401 

+6.3 

Coles 

25,558 

159 

0.8 

3,203 

129 

0.7 

2,476 

-19.0 

Crawford 

257,449 

2,089 

11.0 

42,185 

1,764 

9.2 

33,967 

-15.6 

De  Witt 

3,949 

54 

0.3 

1,084 

52 

0.3 

1,006 

-2.8 

Douglas 

3,684 

5 

0.0 

104 

6 

0.0 

123 

+23.9 

Edgar 

4,833 

81 

0.4 

1,629 

78 

0.4 

1,497 

-3.6 

Edwards 

58,244 

488 

2.6 

9.852 

423 

2.2 

8,138 

+13.4 

Effingham 

20,624 

253 

1.3 

5,104 

300 

1.6 

5,784 

+18.8 

Fayette 

413,962 

975 

5.1 

19,691 

969 

5.1 

18,654 

-0.7 

Franklin 

83,154 

675 

3.5 

13,629 

598 

3.1 

11,519 

-11.4 

Gallatin 

56,671 

293 

1.5 

5,917 

293 

1.5 

5,635 

-0.2 

Hamilton 

138,917 

309 

1.6 

6,232 

257 

1.3 

4,945 

-16.8 

Jackson 

115 

4 

0.0 

85 

2 

0.0 

40 

-50.8 

Jasper 

62,620 

661 

3.5 

13,342 

616 

3.2 

1 1 ,872 

-6.7 

Jefferson 

96,758 

710 

3.7 

14,342 

712 

3.7 

13,707 

+0.2 

Lawrence 

430,631 

2,559 

13.4 

51,657 

2,479 

13.0 

47,753 

-3.1 

Macon 

2,740 

66 

0.4 

1,343 

49 

0.3 

944 

-26.3 

Macoupin 

415 

10 

0.1 

196 

9 

0.1 

178 

-5.0 

Madison 

18,946 

75 

0.4 

1,521 

104 

0.5 

2,001 

+37.9 

Marion 

437,782 

1,209 

6.3 

24,410 

1,225 

6.4 

23,590 

+  1.3 

McDonough- 

Hancockc 

5,703 

2 

0.0 

49 

2 

0.0 

48 

+2.1 

Monroe 

169 

20 

0.1 

399 

23 

0.1 

439 

+15.4 

Montgomery 

165 

2 

0.0 

43 

2 

0.0 

44 

+7.1 

Morgan 

6 

1 

0.0 

20 

1 

0.0 

17 

-10.5 

Moultrie 

140 

2 

0.0 

42 

2 

0.0 

42 

+4.5 

Perry 

970 

8 

0.1 

162 

5 

0.0 

103 

-33.2 

Piatt 

8 

f 

0.0 

3 

— 

— 

— 

— 

Randolph 

5,048 

11 

0.1 

218 

34 

0.2 

649 

+211.7 

Richland 

113,831 

611 

3.2 

12,329 

611 

3.2 

1 1 ,770 

+0.1 

St.  Clair 

3,699 

20 

0.1 

409 

21 

0.1 

412 

+5.4 

Saline 

25,405 

226 

1.2 

4,571 

202 

1.1 

3,886 

-10.9 

Sangamon 

5,343 

79 

0.4 

1,586 

79 

0.4 

1,512 

0.0 

Schuyler 

248 

13 

0.1 

257 

11 

0.1 

217 

-11.8 

Shelby 

2,364 

52 

0.3 

1,058 

46 

0.2 

877 

-13.1 

Wabash 

123,689 

931 

4.9 

18,806 

863 

4.5 

16,615 

-7.4 

Washington 

36,973 

360 

1.9 

7,266 

377 

2.0 

7,267 

+4.8 

Wayne 

281,060 

1,572 

8.3 

31,744 

1,799 

9.4 

34,640 

+14.4 

White 

321,431 

1,728 

9.1 

34,888 

1,628 

8.5 

31,363 

-5.8 

Williamson 

2,875 

39 

0.2 

785 

44 

0.2 

847 

^13.1 

Other" 

20,097 

955 

5.0 

19,288 

1,566 

8.2 

30,165 

+63.9 

TOTAL6 

3,443,435 

19,066 

100.0 

384,941 

19,137 

100.0 

368,586 

+0.4 

Source:  Illinois  State  Geological  Survey. 

Could  not  be  assigned  to  individual  field  or  county. 

No  oil  production  reported  for  Hancock  County  in  1971-1978;  156  bbl  was  produced  in  1991  and  277  bbl  in  1992. 

Value  calculated  at  an  estimated  average  price  of  $20.19/barrel  for  1991  and  $19.26/barrel  for  1992. 

Data  may  not  add  up  to  totals  shown  because  of  independent  rounding. 

Less  than  1,000  bbl. 


36 


Table  14 

Crude  oil  production  from  major  fields  (moi 

e  than  200,000  barrels  per  year) 

in  Illinois,  1991- 

-1992a 

1991 

1992 

1991- 
chanc 

Field 

County 

Production 
(1000  bbl) 

%  of  Illinois 
total 

Production 
(1000  bbl) 

%  of  Illinois 
total 

-1992 
|e  (%) 

Lawrence 

Lawrence 
Crawford 

Clay  City 
Consolidated 

Clay 
Wayne 
Richland 
Jasper 

Main  Consolidated 

Crawford 
Lawrence 
Jasper 

Salem 

Marion 
Jefferson 

Louden 

Fayette 
Effingham 

New  Harmony 
Consolidated 

White 

Wabash 

Edwards 

Sailor  Springs 
Consolidated 

Clay 

Jasper 

Effingham 

Phillipstown 
Consolidated 

White 
Edwards 

Roland 
Consolidated 

White 
Gallatin 

Albion  Consolidated 

Edwards 
White 

Allendale 

Wabash 
Lawrence 

Johnsonville 
Consolidated 

Wayne 

Herald 
Consolidated 

White 
Gallatin 

TOTAL 


2,504.5 


1,998.4 
930.8 
858.6 

811.5 

405.8 

365.5 

280.4 

238.6 

222.9 
b 

214.4 

10,945.4 


13.1 


2,114.0  11.1 


10.5 


4.9 


4.5 


4.3 


2.1 


1.9 


1.5 


1.3 


1.2 


1.1 


57.4 


2,412.6 


2,116.8 


790.2 


10,667.5 


12.6 


11.1 


4.1 


55.7 


-3.7 


+0.1 


1,667.4 

8.7 

-16.6 

945.7 

4.9 

+1.6 

848.5 

4.4 

-1.2 

-2.6 


374.3 

2.0 

-7.8 

392.9 

2.1 

+7.5 

258.2 

1.3 

-7.9 

225.8 

1.2 

-5.4 

203.8 

1.1 

-8.6 

431.4 

2.3 

, 

-2.5 


a     Source:  Illinois  State  Geological  Survey. 
b     Less  than  200,000  barrels  of  oil  per  year. 


37 


Table  15   Petroleum  products  consumed  in  Illinois,  1 988-1 992a 


1988 


1989d 


1990° 


1991c 


1992 


20,344 

120,176 

124,538 

110,960 

113,895 

350 

367 

174 

203 

142 

33,662 

34,565 

42,529 

36,149 

36,377 

5,908 

4,048 

3,622 

3,454 

2,354 

3,369 

3,455 

3,556 

3,181 

3,243 

45,341 

12,389 

12,471 

14,539 

12,482 

5,604 

8,052 

8,339 

7,917 

9,293 

28,278 

28,145 

30,692 

28,797 

32,665 

242,855 

211,199 

225,918 

205,201 

210,451 

Motor  gasoline 
Kerosene 
Distillate  fuel  oil 
Residual  fuel  oil 
Lubricants 
Liquefied  gases 
Asphalt  and  road  oil 
Otherc 
TOTAL 


Source:  State  Energy  Data  Report,  U.S.  DOE/EIA-0214. 

Aviation  and  motor  gasoline  and  jet  fuel. 

Includes  natural  gasoline,  unfractionated  stream,  plant  condensate,  petrochemical  feedstocks,  special  naphthas, 

nonelectric  utility  sector  use  of  petroleum  coke,  still  gas,  wax,  unfinished  oils,  motor  gasoline  and  aviation  gasoline 

lending  components,  and  miscellaneous  products. 

Revised. 


Table  16   Natural 

gas  production  in 

Illinois, 

1 985-1 992a 

Withdrawals  (million  cu  ft) 

Gas 

Oil 

Year 

wells 

wells 

Total 

1985 

1,228.0 

96.0 

1,324 

1986 

1,545.9 

341.6 

1,888 

1987 

1,215.2 

155.8 

1,371 

1988 

1,289.5 

181.2 

1,471 

1989 

1 ,268.0 

209.0 

1,477 

1990 

653.0 

24.0 

677 

1991 

453.0 

13.0 

466 

1992 

336.0 

10.0 

346 

Source:  Illinois  State  Geological  Survey. 


38 


Table  17   Natural  gas  production  from  large  fields  in  Illinois  counties,  1 990-1 992a 


County 

Production  (million 

cuft) 

Change (%) 

Gas  field 

1990 

1991 

1992 

1990-1991 

1991-1992 

Liberty 

Adams 

181.7 

41.3 

e 

-77.3 

— 

Stolletown 

Clinton 

33.3 

18.8 

b 

-43.5 

— 

Mattoon 

Coles 

60.6 

32.9 

41.1 

-45.7 

+24.9 

Ashmore  East 

Edgar 

28.2 

21.5 

26.7 

-23.8 

+24.2 

Omaha 

Gallatin 

58.3 

81.0 

83.0 

+38.9 

+2.5 

St.  Libory 

St.  Clair 

104.6 

95.1 

93.7 

-9.1 

-1.5 

Eldorado  West 

Saline 

38.4 

38.5 

44.2 

+0.3 

+14.8 

Harco  East 

Saline 

— 

b 

37.7 

— 

— 

Raleigh  South 

Saline 

b 

b 

e 

-2.5 

— 

Pittsburg 

Williamson 

133.9 

101.5 

e 

-24.2 

— 

Other" 

37.9 

35.5 

19.3 

-6.3 

-45.6 

TOTALc 

676.9 

466.1 

345.6 

-31.1 

-25.9 

Source:  Illinois  State  Geological  Survey.  Fields  producing  20  million  cu  ft  or  more. 

Louden,  Fayette,  and  Effingham  Counties  (1990,  1991,  1992);  Eden,  Randolph  County;  Eldorado  Consolidated,  Saline 

County  (1990,  1991);  Raleigh  South,  Saline  County  (1990,  1991);  Harco  East,  Saline  County  (1991);  Stolletown, 

Clinton  County  (1992). 

Data  may  not  add  up  to  totals  shown  because  of  independent  rounding. 

Depleted. 

Idled. 


Table  18   Natural  gas  consumed  in  Illinois,  1991-19923 


1991 

1992 

Consumers 

Quantity 

(million 

cuft) 

%  of  total 
consumption 

Quantity 

(million 

cuft) 

%  of  total 
consumption 

1991-1992 
change  (%) 

Residential 

466,970 

47.3 

475,597 

47.9 

+1.8 

Commercial 

193,842 

19.6 

194,517 

19.6 

+0.3 

Industrial 

302,691 

30.6 

303,146 

30.5 

+0.2 

Electric  utilities 

12,865 

1.4 

9,290 

0.9 

-27.8 

Vehicle  fuel 

7 

— 

1 

— 

-85.7 

Total  delivered 

to  consumers 

976,374 

98.9 

982,551 

98.9 

+0.6 

Other  uses" 

1,215 

1.1 

10,449 

1.1 

+760.0 

Total  consumption 

987,589 

100.0 

993,000 

100.0 

+0.5 

a     Source:  U.S.  Department  of  Energy. 

b     Includes  lease  and  plant  fuel,  pipeline  fuel,  and  extraction  loss. 

0     Not  available. 

39 


Table  1 9   Production  and  value  of  sand  and  gravel  in  districts  of  Illinois,8  1 992b 


County 


Companies0         Operations 


Total  quantity 
(1000  ton) 


Value 
($1000) 


District  1 

Boone 

Jo  Davies 

Rock  Island 

Bureau 

Kane 

Stephenson 

Cook 

Lake 

Whiteside 

De  Kalb 

McHenry 

Will 

Du  Page 

Ogle 

Winnebago 

Henry 

District  2 

Adams 

Peoria 

Sangamon 

Fulton 

Pike 

Tazewell 

Logan 

District  3 

Champaign 

Kendall 

Moultrie 

Clark 

La  Salle 

Piatt 

Coles 

Livingston 

Putnam 

Cumberland 

Macon 

Shelby 

Ford 

Marshall 

Vermilion 

Grundy 

McLean 

Woodford 

Kankakee 

District  4 

Bond 

Jackson 

Randolph 

Crawford 

Lawrence 

Saline 

Fayette 

Madison 

St.  Clair 

Gallatin 

Pulaski 

White 

51 


16 


45 


18 


59 


18 


52 


20 


22,405 


3,966 


6,823 


2,501 


83,095 


12,053 


21,330 


7,242 


TOTAL 


113' 


149 


35,695 


123,720 


a     See  figure  9. 

b     Source:  U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines. 

0    Column  does  not  add  up  to  the  total  shown  because  some  companies  have  operations  in  more  than  one  county. 


Table  20   Illinois  sand  and  gravel  production  by  size  of  operation,  1990  and  1992a 


1990 

1992 

Size  of  operation 

No.  of 

Production8 

%0f 

No.  Of 

Production" 

%of 

(tons/years) 

operations 

(1000  tons) 

total 

operations 

(1000  tons) 

total 

less  than  25,000 

31 

227 

0.7 

30 

264 

0.7 

25,000  to  49,999 

17 

628 

1.9 

11 

392 

1.1 

50,000  to  99,999 

28 

2,121 

6.6 

29 

2,077 

5.8 

100,000  to  199,999 

32 

4,757 

14.7 

34 

5,172 

14.5 

200,000  to  299,999 

14 

3,402 

10.5 

16 

3,884 

10.9 

300,000  to  399,999 

6 

2,067 

6.4 

6 

1,974 

5.5 

400,000  to  999,999 

6 

3,388 

10.4 

15 

8,495 

23.8 

1 ,000,000  and  more 

9 

15,790 

48.8 

8 

13,437 

37.7 

TOTAL 

143 

32.380 

100.0 

149 

35,696 

100.0 

Source:  U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines.  As  a  result  of  the  canvassing  procedure  used  for  sand  and  gravel  production,  1991 
information  will  not  be  available. 


40 


Table  21    Use  of  sand  and  gravel  produced  in  Illinois,  1990  and  1992a 


199C 

) 

1992 

1990-92 

1990-92 

Quantity 

Value 

Quantity 

Value 

change  in 

change  in 

(1000  tons) 

($1000) 

(1000  tons) 

($1000) 

quantity  (%) 

value  (%) 

Sand  and  gravel 

Construction  operations 

Building 

16,427 

47,969 

10,185 

31,835 

-38.0 

-33.6 

Paving 

7,638 

31,525 

8,166 

35,974 

+6.9 

+14.1 

Fill 

3,700 

9,354 

3,920 

11,375 

+5.9 

+21.6 

Other  usesb 

4,616 

15,880 

13,424 

44,536 

+190.8 

+180.5 

Totalc 

32,380 

104,728 

35,695 

123,720 

+10.2 

+18.1 

Industrial  sancf 

Totalc 

4,328 

56,142 

4,410 

56,741 

+1.9 

+1.1 

Total  sand  and  gravel0 

36,708 

160,870 

40,105 

180,461 

+9.3 

+12.2 

a  Source:  U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines. 

b  Includes  railroad  ballast  and  other  unspecified  materials 

0  Data  may  not  add  up  to  totals  shown  because  of  independent  rounding. 

d  Data  on  use  for  industrial  sand  are  no  longer  received. 


41 


Table  22   Portland  cement  manufactured  in  Illinois,  1 991-1 992a 


Change  (%) 

1991 

1992 

1991-1992 

Active  plants 

4 

4 

— 

Production  (tons) 

2,665,000 

Shipments  from  mills 

Quantity  (tons) 

2,815,967 

2,854,000 

+1.35 

Value  ($) 

116,046,000 

118,747,000 

+3.19 

Average  value/ton 

41.21 

41.61 

+0.97 

Stocks  at  mills,  Dec.  31 

(tons) 

310,000 

a     Source:  U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines. 


Table  23   Illinois  mineral  production  data  for  1992  compared  with  preliminary  data  for  1993a 


1992 

1993 

Chang 
1992- 

e  (%) 

Value 

Value 

1993 

Minerals  extracted 

Unit 

Quantity 

($  1000) 

Quantity 

($  1000) 

Quantity 

Value 

Fuels 

Coal 

thousand 

60,332 

1 ,668,778 

42,246 

1,168,524  b 

-30.0 

-30.0 

Crude  oil 

thousand  bbl 

19,137 

368,586 

19,090  b 

34,075  b 

-1.7 

-10.7 

Natural  gas 

million  cu  ft 

346 

743 

250  b 

575  b 

-22.7 

-22.6 

Industrial  and  construction  materials 

Stonec 

thousand  tons 

72,700 ' 

332,800 ' 

73,500 

338,100 

+1.1 

+4.7 

Sand  and  gravel 

thousand  tons 

40,105 

180,461 

41,273' 

189,389' 

+2.9 

+4.9 

Clayd 

thousand  tons 

590 

2,362 

188 

1,147 

-68.1 

-51.4 

Metals,  gemstones 

and 

other  undisclosed6 

63,845 

42,080 

-34.1 

Total  value  of  minerals  extracted 

2,607,575 

2,073,895 

-20.5 

Source:  U.S.  Bureau  of  Mines  and  Illinois  Department  of  Mines  and  Minerals. 
Estimated  by  Illinois  State  Geological  Survey. 
Dimension  stone  included  with  values  that  cannot  be  disclosed. 
Excludes  fuller's  earth;  included  with  values  that  cannot  be  disclosed. 

Includes  fluorspar,  zinc,  barite,  peat,  gemstones,  and  fuller's  earth  for  1992  and  1993,  and  copper,  lead, 
silver,  tripoli  for  1992  with  no  estimate  for  1993. 
Estimated  data. 


42 


Table  24   Illinois  coal  shipped  to  consumers  in  the  United  States,  1991— 1993a 


1991 

1992 

1993 

Jan-Sept 

Jan-Sept 

Jan-Sept 

1991-1992 

1992-1993 

Consumers 

(1000  tons) 

change  (%) 

change  (%) 

Electric  utilities 

39,169 

40,078 

28,559 

+  2.3 

-28.7 

Coke  and  gas  plant 

498 

421 

240 

-15.5 

-43.0 

Retail  dealers 

257 

209 

249 

-18.7 

+19.2 

Industrial  plants 

2,764 

3,005 

3,122 

+  8.7 

+  3.9 

Used  at  mine 

5 

1 

— 

-80.0 

— 

Foreign 

846 

954 

629 

+12.8 

-34.1 

Total 

43,539 

44,668 

32,799 

+  2.6 

-26.6 

Source:  U.S.  Department  of  Energy,  Coal  Distribution,  January-September  1991  and  1992, 
and  Quarterly  Coal  Report,  January-September  1993. 


Table  25  Total  coal  consumed  by  end-use  sectors  in  Illinois,  1 991-1 993a 


1991 

1992 

1993 

Jan-Sept 

Jan-Sept 

Jan-Sept 

1991-1992 

1992-1993 

Consumers 

(1000  tons) 

change  (%) 

change  (%) 

Electric  utilities 

20,672 

19,515 

18,782 

-5.6 

-3.8 

Coke  and  gas  plant 

1,056 

1,240 

1,594 

+17.4 

+28.6 

Retail  dealers 

174 

203 

189 

+16.7 

-6.9 

Industrial  plants 

3,185 

2,613 

3,276 

-18.0 

+25.4 

Total 

25,087 

23,571 

23,842 

-  6.0 

+  1.1 

Source:  U.S.  Department  of  Energy,  Quarterly  Coal  Report,  January-September,  1991, 
1992  and  1993. 


43