Skip to main content

Full text of "The importance of runoff and winter anoxia to P and N dynamics of a beaver pond"

See other formats


Ontario 


^'f^ 


THE  IMPORTANCE  OF 
RUNOFF  AND  WINTER  ANOXIA 
TO  P  AND  N  DYNAMICS 
OF  A  BEAVER  POND 


OCTOBER  1992 


Environment 
Environnement 


C^//o/f 


ISBN  0-7778-0166-3 


THE  IMPORTANCE  OF  RUNOFF  AND  WINTER  ANOXIA 
TO  P  AND  N  DYNAMICS  OF  A  BEAVER  POND 


OCTOBER  1992 


© 


Cette  publication  technique 
n'est  disponible  qu'en  anglais. 

Copyright:  Queen's  Printer  for  Ontario,  1992 

This  publication  may  be  reproduced  for  non-commercial  purposes 

with  appropriate  attribution. 

PIBS  2165 
Log  92-2345-112 


THE  IMPORTANCE  OF  RUNOFF  AND  WINTER  ANOXIA 
TO  P  AND  N  DYNAMICS  OF  A  BEAVER  POND 


Report  prepared  by: 

Kevin  J.  Devito* 

Watershed  Ecosystems  Program,  Trent  University 
P.O.  Box  4800,  Peterborough,  Ontario,  Canada  K9J  7B8 

and 

Peter  J.  Dillon 

Dorset  Research  Centre,  Ontario  Ministry  of  the  Environment 
Bellwood  Acres  Road,  P.O.  Box  39,  Dorset,  Ontario,  Canada  POA  lEO 


^Present  address:   Department  of  Geography,  York  University 
North  York,  Ontario,  Canada  M3J  1P3 


OCTOBER  1992 


PIBS  2165 


ABSTRACT 

A  mass  balance  approach  was  used  to  determine  the  factors  influencing  phosphorus  and 
nitrogen  dynamics  in  beaver  ponds.  The  relationships  of  runoff,  pond  surface  water 
temperature,  dissolved  oxygen  (DO)  and  redox  potential  (ORP)  to  the  annual  and  seasonal 
total  phosphorus  (TP)  and  total  nitrogen  (TP)  retention  of  a  headwater  beaver  pond 
situated  on  the  Precambrian  Shield,  central  Ontario,  were  examined  during  1987-88.  Annual 
retention  of  TP  (-11%)  and  TN  (-5%)  were  low,  P  and  N  were  transformed  within  the 
pond.  On  an  annual  basis  inputs  exceeded  outputs  of  total  reactive  P  (71%)  and  NO3-N 
(35%)  and  outputs  exceeded  inputs  of  total  unreactive  P  (-33%)  and  total  organic  N  (-26%), 
while  inputs  approximated  outputs  of  NH4-N  (-8%).  Marked  seasonal  trends  in  P  and  N 
retention  were  observed.  Trends  in  monthly  TP  and  TN  retention  showed  a  strong  inverse 
relationship  with  runoff.  There  was  a  weak  relationship  between  monthly  retention  and 
average  water  temperature  and  ORP.  The  timing  of  the  major  processes  of  nutrient  cycUng 
with  seasonal  variations  in  runoff  and  nutrient  transport  influenced  the  seasonal,  and  thus 
armual,  TP  and  TN  retention.  Positive  monthly  retention  coincided  with  low  runoff  and 
high  biotic  assimilation  during  the  growing  season.  Winter  ice  cover  was  associated  with 
undetectable  DO  and  low  ORP  (<0  mV)  and  increased  levels  of  P  and  N,  particularly  NH4.- 
N  (>800  Mg  L"^)-  High  levels  of  P  and  N  in  the  water  were  coupled  with  increased  runoff 
and  potentially  low  biotic  assimilation  resulting  in  a  net  release  of  TP  and  TN  during  the 
winter.  Large  flow-through  of  waterbome  inputs  and  flushing  of  regenerated  P  and  N  from 
the  beaver  pond  occurred  during  peak  snowmelt  runoff,  resulting  in  low  aimual  retention. 
Estimates  of  burial  rates  suggest  that  P  and  N  have  accumulated  in  the  pond  sediments. 


Initial  accumulation  of  flooded  forest  material  and  input  of  organic  matter  by  beaver  may 
be  very  important  to  the  P  and  N  dynamics  of  the  pond,  representing  a  long  term  source  of 
nutrients  to  the  pond  water  and  outflow. 

KEY  WORDS:  beaver  pond,  ice  cover,  nitrogen,  nutrient  retention,  phosphorous, 
Precambrian  Shield,  runoff,  water  residence  time,  winter  anoxia. 

Topic  Sentence: 

1)  Seasonal  and  annual  phosphorous  and  nitrogen  budgets  of  a  beaver  pond 

2)  The  role  of  beaver  ponds  in  P  and  N  dynamics  of  headwater  streams  of  the 
Precambrian  shield 

3)  The  role  of  hydrology  in  P  and  N  dynamics  of  a  beaver  pond. 

4)  The  role  of  winter  anoxia  in  P  and  N  dynamics  of  a  beaver  pond 


u 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

Abstract * 

Table  of  Contents    iii 

Ust  of  Tables iv 

List  of  Figures ^ 

Introduction i 

Study  Area 3 

Methods    ^ 

Results    9 

Discussion 1^ 

Conclusion 24 

Acknowledgements 24 

Literature  Cited 27 


m 


LIST  OF  TABLES 

Table  1  Analytical  procedures. 

Table  2  Seasonal  and  annual  water  (mm)  and  chloride  (mg/m^)  balance  for  Harp  4 

beaver  pond  for  the  1987/88  hydrologie  year,  ±1  SD.    A  negative  balance 
represents  inputs  <  outputs,  and  a  positive  value  represents  inputs  >  outputs. 

Table  3  Waterbome  phosphorus  input,  output  and  retention  (mgP/m^)  for  the  1987/88 

hydrologie  year  for  the  Harp  4  beaver  pond.  Shown  are  estimates  ±  SD. 

Table  4  Harp  4  beaver  pond  waterbome  nitrogen  input,  output  and  retention  (gN/m^) 

for  the  1987/88  hydrologie  year.  Shown  are  estimates  ±  1  SD. 

Table  5  Runoff,  water  retention  and  phosphorus  and  nitrogen  export  and  import  from 

Harp  beaver  pond  for  the  1987/88  hydrologie  year. 


IV 


LIST  OF  FIGURES 

Figure  1  Harp  Lake  subcatchment  #4  showing  the  location  of  stream  sampUng  stations 
(numbers)  and  the  beaver  pond  (Hp4-bp). 

Figure  2  Harp  4  beaver  pond.  Approximate  location  of  water  sampling  sites 
(numbers),  coring  locations  and  water  level  recorder. 

Figure  3  a)  Water  level  and  outflow  discharge  and  b)  temperature  profile  at  site  1, 
Harp  4  beaver  pond  for  March  1  1987  to  May  31  1988. 

Figure  4  Seasonal  variation  in  a)  oxidative  redox  potential  (ORP)  and  b)  dissolved 
oxygen  concentrations  (DO)  of  siirface  and  bottom  water  at  site  1  of  Harp  4 
beaver  pond  from  March  1  1987  to  May  31  1988. 

Figure  5  Seasonal  variation  in  a)  total  phosphorus  (TP)  and  b)  total  reactive 
phosphorus  (TRP)  concentrations  of  surface  and  bottom  water  at  site  1  of 
Harp  4  beaver  pond  from  March  1  1987  to  May  31  1988. 

Figure  6  Seasonal  variation  in  a)  nitrate-nitrite  nitrogen  (NO3-N),  b)  ammonium 
nitrogen  (^fH4-N)  and  c)  total  organic  nitrogen  (TON)  concentrations  of 
smrface  and  bottom  water  at  site  1  of  Harp  4  beaver  pond  from  March  1  1987 
to  May  31  1988. 


Figure  7  Pair-wise  comparison  of  monthly  total  phosphorus  (TP)  retention  with 
monthly  runoff,  mean  redox  potential  and  temperature  for  Harp  4  beaver 
pond  for  March  1987  to  May  1988. 

Figure  8  Pair-wise  comparison  of  monthly  total  nitrogen  (TN)  retention  with  monthly 
runoff,  mean  redox  potential  and  temperature  for  Harp  4  beaver  pond  for 
March  1987  to  May  1988. 


VI 


INTRODUCTION 

Beaver  {Castor  canadensis)  activity,  such  as  dam-building  and  subsequent  flooding  of 
riparian  zones  can  have  a  large  influence  on  the  hydrology  and  nutrient  dynamics  of  streams 
within  the  local  landscape  (Dahm  et  oL  1987,  Naiman  and  Melillo  1984,  Parker  1986). 
Beaver  ponds  are  positioned  such  that  much  of  the  runoff  from  a  catchment  must  pass 
through  them  and  therefore  they  can  greatly  influence  the  export  and  transformation  of 
nutrients  from  terrestrial  to  down  stream  ecosystems  (Naiman  et  al.  1987). 

Despite  the  possible  influence  and  relative  abundance  of  beaver,  our  ability  to  generalize 
about  P  and  N  dynamics  in  beaver  ponds  is  still  limited.  Sequestering  of  P  and  N  in 
deposited  sediments  has  been  reported  in  mountain  areas  of  Wyoming  (Maret  et  aL  1987) 
and  the  Precambrian  shield  area  of  Quebec  (Naiman  and  Melillo  1984).  In  contrast,  Dodds 
and  Castenholz  (1988)  report  a  large  flow-through  of  N  in  a  beaver  inhabited  spring  pond 
in  Oregon.  Devito  et  aL  (1989)  report  low  retention  of  waterbome  TP  and  TN  in  two 
beaver  ponds  on  the  Precambrian  Shield  of  central  Ontario.  Devito  et  aL  (1989)  measured 
a  net  retention  of  inorganic  N  and  net  release  of  organic  N,  but  analysis  of  the  forms  of  P 
have  not  been  done. 

At  present,  no  studies  have  looked  at  processes  influencing  P  and  N  transport  and 
mobilization  in  beaver  ponds  or  other  small  wetlands.  Previous  work  by  Devito  et  aL 
(1989)  suggests  that  seasonal  variations  in  P  and  N  may  control  annual  and  thus  long  term 
retention  in  beaver  ponds  on  the  Precambrian  Shield.   Annual  retentions  of  TP  and  TN 


were  the  difference  between  positive  retention  during  the  ice-free  season  and  significant  net 
output  during  the  winter  and  spring.  The  seasonal  budgets  of  other  beaver  ponds  on  the 
Precambrian  Shield  or  other  geographical  regions  are  not  known. 

Both  hydrologie  and  chemical  processes  are  believed  to  influence  nutrient  export  and  cycling 
in  streams  and  wetlands  (e.g.,  Bayley  et  oL  1985,  King  1985).  Hydrology  acts  as  a  vehicle 
for  export  and  the  losses  of  dissolved  and  particulate  substances  have  been  related  to  the 
magnitude  of  runoff,  water  retention  time  and  water  flow  pathways  in  both  aquatic  and 
terrestrial  ecosystems  (Gorham  et  al.  1979,  Hill  1988,  Bilby  1981).  The  hydrologie  mobility 
of  P  and  N  may  be  controlled  by  homeostatic  processes  in  the  sediments  and  surface  waters 
which  limit  or  enhance  the  transfer  of  nutrients  to  the  hydrologie  component.  The 
dominance  of  anoxic  processes  in  regenerating  nutrients  and  introducing  them  into  the 
stream  water  has  been  observed  in  beaver  dams  and  reservoirs  (Dahm  et  aL  1987,  Baxter 
1977),  but  they  have  not  been  directly  related  to  seasonal  or  aimual  retention  of  P  and  N 
within  a  stream  reach.  Knowledge  of  the  interaction  of  hydrology  and  anoxic  processes  in 
beaver  ponds  and  how  these  vary  seasonally  are  necessary  to  develop  an  understanding  and 
generalize  about  the  nutrient  dynamics  in  beaver  ponds  and  the  adjacent  catchment. 

We  examine  the  influences  of  hydrology  and  water  redox  processes  on  phosphorus  and 
nitrogen  dynamics  in  a  beaver  pond  situated  on  the  Precambrian  Shield.  This  quantitative 
information  is  needed  to  generalize  about  the  possible  role  of  beaver  ponds  on  nutrient 
transport  and  retention  in  small  headwater  streams  of  the  Precambrian  Shield.  The 
magnitude  of  runoff  and  water  retention  time  of  the  pond  were  examined  in  relation  to 


annual  and  seasonal  patterns  of  TP  and  TN  export  and  retention.  Physical  and  chemical 
parameters  and  nutrient  concentrations  of  water  in  the  pond  were  measured  through  the 
1987/88  year  to  determine  the  relationship  between  redox  potential,  the  form  and 
availabiUty  of  F  and  N  and  its  influence  on  annual  and  seasonal  retention  of  these  nutrients. 

STUDY  AREA 

The  beaver  pond  (Hp4-bp)  is  located  in  Harp  Lake  subcatchment  4  (45°  23'N,  79°  08'  W) 
which  is  situated  near  the  southern  border  of  the  Precambrian  Shield,  in  central  Ontario, 
Canada  (Fig.  1).  The  mean  annual  January  and  July  air  temperatures  in  the  study  area  are  - 
11.0  and  17.7  °C,  respectively.  The  water  bodies  in  this  area  are  generally  ice-covered  from 
about  the  beginning  of  December  to  the  middle  of  April.  The  area  receives  900-1100 
mxn/yr  of  precipitation  with  240-300  mm  falling  as  snow.  Each  month  during  the  period  of 
snow  and  ice-cover  some  precipitation  falls  as  rain.  The  long-term  annual  runoff  is  400-600 
mm/yr.  A  more  detailed  description  of  the  climate  and  physiography,  geology,  and 
geochemistry  of  the  area  and  at  Harp  4  subcatchment  has  been  reported  by  Scheider  et  oL 
(1983),  McDonnel  and  Taylor  (1987),  and  Devito  et  aL  (1989). 

The  beaver  pond  (Hp4-bp)  collects  drainage  from  the  upper  reaches  (61.5  ha)  of  the 
subcatchment  (Fig.  1).  It  is  a  shallow  (1.2  m  average  depth),  steep-sided,  dystrophic  pond 
with  floating  mats  of  Sphagnum  spp.  and  Labrador  tea  (Ledum  groerdandicum)  along  the 
shore.  The  beavers  flooded  a  low-lying  forest  and  numerous  dead  tree  snags  still  stand 
throughout  much  of  the  pond.  A  small  valley  bog  (5m  depth)  was  also  flooded  and  a  small 


ying  (0.59  ha)  of  floating  Sphagnum,  L.  groenlandicum,  and  eastern  larch  (Larix  laridna) 
remains  in  the  centre  of  the  pond. 

There  are  several  ephemeral  channelized  inflows  into  the  pond.  Hp4-15,  Hp4-14  and  Hp4-B 
drain  moderately  sloped  uplands  of  primarily  deciduous  forests;  the  former  contains  a  small 
beaver  pond.  The  main  perennial  inflow,  Hp4-18,  drains  a  substantial  portion  of  the 
watershed  (39.2  ha)  containing  a  large  conifer  swamp  and  a  beaver  pond.  Unchîumelized 
inputs  derived  from  the  area  adjacent  the  pond  (9.7  ha)  drain  moderate  grade  uplands  of 
deciduous  forests  with  small  stands  of  conifers.  The  depth  of  overbm"den  surrounding  the 
beaver  pond  ranges  from  1-2  m  to  exposed  bedrock, 

METHODS 

Precipitation  depths  and  air  temperature  data  were  obtained  from  a  meteorological  station 
located  within  1  km  of  the  pond  (Locke  and  de  Grosbois  1986).  Streamflow  at  the  mouth 
of  Harp  4  subcatchment  has  been  measured  since  1976  (Scheider  et  al  1983).  Stream 
discharge  at  the  beaver  pond  outflow,  Hp4-13,  was  continuously  monitored  from  May  1987, 
to  June  1988.  From  March  1987  to  June  1988  instantaneous  discharges  of  the  inflow 
streams  to  Hp4  beaver  pond  were  measured  at  least  once  a  week,  but  more  frequently 
(often  twice  daily)  during  peak  flow.  Mean  daily  discharge  data  were  calculated  by  linear 
integration  of  instantaneous  discharge  measurements  (Scheider  et  oL  1979).  Discharge  at 
Hp4-18  was  estimated  by  regression  relationship  between  instantaneous  discharge  at  Hp4-18 
and  that  at  Hp4-13: 


Discharge  Hp4-18  =   0.557*  (Discharge  Hp4-13)^"',  n=46,  R^= 0.909,  se =4.32 

Runoff  from  ungauged  areas  adjacent  the  pond  was  estimated  from  the  unit  areal  runoff  at 
Hp4-13  during  the  study  period.  Water  level  in  the  pond  was  continuously  monitored  during 
the  ice-free  period  of  1987  (Fig.  2).  Staff  gauge  readings  were  recorded  on  a  daily  to  weekly 
basis  during  the  other  periods. 

Precipitation,  stream  and  pond  water  sampling  were  carried  out  as  described  by  Locke  and 
Scott  (1986).  During  1987/88  samples  were  taken  daily  to  weekly  according  to  discharge. 
Surface  water  of  Hp4  beaver  pond  was  sampled  at  two  depths,  0.3-0.5  m  and  0.9-1.1  m 
below  the  water  surface,  at  each  of  4  sites  in  the  pond  (Fig.  2).  During  the  winter,  sampling 
was  carried  out  through  holes  cut  in  the  ice  with  plastic  AVS  collars  frozen  in  place  to 
prevent  surface  rain  and  meltwater  draining  into  the  underlying  water  column. 

Analytical  methods  are  reported  in  Table  1.  The  platinum/calomel  electrode  used  for  ORP 
measurements  was  standardized  with  Zobell  solution  (Zobell  1946).  The  calomel  electrode 
potential  (EM)  was  converted  to  the  standard  hydrogen  potential  (EH)  and  corrected  for 
temperature  (T)  using  the  equation  of  Skoog  and  West  (1976),  where:  EH  =  EM  +  223  + 
0.76  T  (°C).  Total  organic  nitrogen  (TON)  was  calculated  as  TKN  -  NH4-N,  total  unreactive 
P  (TUP)  as  TP  -  TRP,  and  total  nitrogen  (TN)  as  TKN  +  NO3-N. 

Sediment  cores  were  collected  at  the  end  of  May  in  1987  and  1988  (Fig.  2).  A  Plexiglass 
tube  (10  cm  diameter)  was  inserted  by  hand  to  approximately  20  cm  depth  into  the 


sediments  and  the  extracted  sediment  was  sectioned  into  5  cm  segments.  Water  content  and 
bulk  density  were  determined  according  to  Paivanen  (1969),  and  sediment  TP  and  TKN  as 
in  Table  1. 

Water  and  Nutrient  Budget 

A  general  water  budget  equation  for  the  beaver  pond  is: 

P  +  Ui  +  S"  Sj  -  E  -  So  ±  A  W   =  0  ±  e  (1) 

All  nmoff  from  the  base  of  each  microcatchment  was  assumed  to  be  surface  stream  flow. 
Inputs  include  stream  inflows  (Sj),  precipitation  depth  (P)  and  ungauged  runoff  (Uj).  Both 
subsurface  and  diffuse  surface  flow  from  imgauged  areas  adjacent  to  the  pond  were 
combined  into  imgauged  runoff.  Outputs  include  stream  outflow  (S^,),  évapotranspiration 
(E)  and  change  in  storage  (AW).  For  water  storage,  the  change  in  volimie  of  the  pond  was 
assumed  to  be  constant  with  depth.  Potential  évapotranspiration  (E)  was  estimated  from 
Thomthwaite's  (1948)  equation.  Deep  ground  water  inputs  and  outputs  were  assumed  to 
be  negligible,  due  to  the  impermeable  nature  of  the  bedrock.  The  inputs  should  balance 
outputs  ±  measiu-ement  errors  (e).  Chloride  budgets  were  measured  as  a  check  on 
hydrologie  budgets  (Kadlec  and  Kadlec  1979). 

For  this  study,  waterbome  nutrient  retention  (RT)  was  calculated  from  inputs  which  include 
bulk  atmospheric  deposition  (Pj),  stream  inflow  (Sj),  unchannelized  or  ungauged  inflows  (Uj) 
and  outputs  as  stream  outflow  (S^): 

±  RT  =  Pi  +  s°Si  +  Uj  -  So  (2) 

Both  wet  precipitation  and  dry  deposition  are  incorporated  into  Pj. 


Atmospheric  deposition  was  calculated  as  described  by  Locke  and  de  Grosbois  (1986). 
Reactive  phosphorus  measurements  in  bulk  deposition  were  previously  determined  to  be 
34%  ±  50%  of  the  TP  deposition  (Dillon  and  Reid  1981). 

Stream  load  was  determined  by  integrating  the  estimated  daily  average  discharge  over  each 
sampling  period  and  multiplying  the  total  volimie  of  water  by  the  nutrient  concentration  at 
the  midpoint  of  each  time  interval  (Scheider  et  al  1979).  Nutrient  loads  from  adjacent 
ungauged  areas  (Ui)  were  determined  from  the  mean  monthly  volume/weight  concentration 
of  three  nearby  upland  streams  multiplied  by  prorated  monthly  runoff  volume.  TN  and  TP 
storage  in  the  sediments  was  estimated  from  the  average  chemical  content  multiplied  by  the 
estimated  bulk  density  for  each  sediment  subsample. 

Absolute  retention  (RT)  of  the  beaver  pond  was  calculated  as: 

RT  =  (total  inputs  -  total  outputs)  /  pond  area. 
Percent  retention  (%RT)  as: 

%RT  =  ((total  inputs  -  total  outputs)  /  total  inputs)   *  100. 

Error  Estimates 

The  variance  of  water  budget  calculations  was  calculated  to  obtain  the  standard  deviation 
(Winter  1981): 

Sp'  +  Su^  +  S"  Si^  +  Se^  +  Sso^  +  S^w^  =  ^  (3) 

where  n  equals  the  number  of  inflow  streams  (Sj)  and  Sy  is  the  standard  deviation  of  the 


total  monthly  water  budget.  All  the  measurement  errors  are  assimied  to  be  independent 
and  covariance  terms  are  not  included  (Winter  1981).  To  obtain  S^  total  monthly  water 
voltmies  were  multiplied  by  their  associated  fractional  error  (C.V.)  and  then  squared  and 
simimed.  The  variances  of  all  products  in  this  study  were  approximated  as  (Mood  et  al. 
1974): 

VAR(X,Y)  -  u^2«vAR(Y)  +  Uy2«VAR(X)  +  VAR(Y)VAR(X)  (4) 

VAR(X)  and  VAR(Y)  are  the  product  of  the  water  volume  or  concentration  multipUed  by 
the  fraction  error  (C.V.)  and  then  squared.  S|  for  each  of  the  nutrient  retention  estimates 
was  calculated  using  Eq.  3.  To  obtain  S^  for  TN,  TON,  TIN  and  TUP  retention,  variance 
estimates  associated  with  the  parameters  used  to  calculate  each  mass  were  summed.  The 
variance  associated  with  nutrient  mass  was  determined  for  each  sampling  time  interval  and 
summed  to  produce  either  seasonal  or  annual  values. 

Error  associated  with  daily  and  monthly  stream  discharge  measurements  are  reported  in 
Devito  and  Dillon  (1992)  and  range  from  18-73%  for  mean  daily  stream  discharge.  Based 
on  a  comparison  of  monthly  stream  discharge  from  several  microcatchments  in  the  study 
area  the  percent  error  in  estimating  monthly  discharge  volume  by  linear  integrations  is 
estimated  at  ±  27%  (Devito  and  Dillon  1992).  Errors  associated  with  measuring 
precipitation  were  not  determined  directly.  Errors  based  on  equipment  used  and  the  rain 
fall  patterns  in  this  area  are  assumed  to  be  ±  21%  per  month  (see  Devito  et  al.  1989,  Winter 
1981).  The  range  of  uncertainty  for  determining  stage  for  the  pond  was  ±  2  mm.  The  C.V. 
associated  with  estimating  the  area  of  the  pond  from  airphotos  are  assumed  to  be  ±  10%. 


Analytical  and  sampling  errors  associated  with  determining  stream  water  and  bulk 
deposition  chemistry  of  discrete  samples  ranged  from  1.5%  to  18%  and  are  reported  in 
Locke  (1988)  and  Devito  (1989).  Errors  associated  with  volimie  weighted  concentrations 
are  assumed  equivalent  to  analytical  and  sampling  errors. 

The  errors  associated  with  each  component  of  the  budgets  were  assumed  to  be  random  and 
normally  distributed.  Potentially  important  immeasured  and  systematic  errors  have  not  been 
included  in  the  error  analyses.  The  following  variance  estimates,  therefore,  must  be 
considered  as  only  the  precision  of  water  and  nutrient  budget  estimates,  and  actual  errors 
are  probably  greater  than  indicated  (Devito  and  Dillon  1992). 

RESULTS 

Water  and  Waterbome  Nutrient  Budgets 

Annual  inputs  and  outputs  of  water  and  chloride  for  1987/88  in  Hp4-bp  roughly  balanced 
(Table  2).  On  an  annual  basis  the  major  input  was  via  runoff  with  precipitation  contributing 
<15%.  Potential  rates  of  ET  and  change  in  storage  were  minor  outputs  representing  <10 
and  <1%  respectively.  The  relative  contribution  of  each  component  varied  seasonally. 
Positive  retention  of  water  and  CI  ocoirred  during  the  summer  and  winter  with  negative 
retention  occurring  during  the  spring  (Table  2).  Precipitation,  potential  ET  and  change 
in  storage  were  dominant  components  of  the  summer  budget.     Runoff  increased  in 


importance  and  represented  the  major  input  and  output  during  the  winter  and  spring 
months. 

The  chemical  budgets  strongly  suggest  that  the  pond  has  very  low  TP  and  TN  retention 
efficiencies  with  absolute  retentions  less  than  the  budget  uncertainties  (Tables  3  and  4), 
During  the  1987/88  water  year,  there  was  a  positive  retention  of  TRP  (71%)  and  negative 
retention  of  TUP  (-33%),  resulting  in  a  low  retention  efficiency  of  TP  (-11%  or  -12.1  ±  10.5 
mg/m^).  There  was  no  significant  retention  of  NH4-N  (-8%),  but  NO3-N  (35%)  was 
retained  in  the  pond.  A  net  release  of  TON  (-26%)  resulted  in  a  low  retention  efficiency 
(-5%)  of  0.20  ±  0.19  g/m  TN. 

Marked  seasonal  trends  in  P  and  N  retention  were  observed  in  Hp4-bp  during  1987/88 
(Tables  3  and  4).  Generally  P  and  N  were  retained  during  the  summer  months  and  released 
during  the  winter  and  spring.  Relative  retention  of  TUP  and  TON  was  variable  with  the 
greatest  negative  percent  retention  occurring  during  the  winter.  TRP  and  NO3-N  were 
exceptions.  NO3  was  retained  during  all  seasons  except  during  spring  where  inputs 
approximated  outputs.  Relative  retention  of  TRP  was  high  in  all  seasons  with  an  increase 
in  absolute  retention  with  an  increase  in  inputs. 

The  absolute  input  and  output  of  nutrients  varied  seasonally,  with  the  greatest  flux  of  P  and 
N  occurring  via  runoff  during  the  winter  and  spring  (Table  5).  Dvuing  April  1988,  29  to 
35%  of  the  annual  input  and  output  of  TP  and  TN  of  Hp4-bp  occurred. 


10 


Pond  Hydrology  and  Chemistiy 

The  outflow  hydrograph  and  pond  water  levels  from  March  1987  to  May  1988  are  shown 
in  Fig.  3.  Discharge  varied  over  the  year,  with  low  base  flow  through  the  summer  and  peak 
discharge  during  snowmelt  in  March  and  >^ril.  Discharge  peaks  occurring  through  late  fall 
and  winter  were  a  result  of  snowmelt,  associated  with  rain,  where  much  of  the  accumulated 
snow  pack  was  lost. 

Water  levels  in  the  pond  varied  seasonally  with  runoff  rates.  The  lowest  water  levels  were 
observed  during  late  summer.  The  potential  water  storage  in  the  pond  was  small.  A  20  cm 
rise  during  the  fall  represented  only  about  2  cm  of  runoff  from  the  surrounding  catchment. 
Water  levels  in  the  pond  responded  rapidly  to  increases  in  runoff  with  peaks  in  water  level 
coinciding  with  outflow  hydrographs  (Fig.  3).  Water  levels  exceeded  the  main  dam  height 
during  both  the  1987  and  1988  spring  snow  melt.  The  annual  residence  time  of  water  for 
1987/88  in  the  existing  pond  was  47  days  (Table  5).  This  compares  with  6  hours  for  the 
initial  stream  if  it  had  the  same  channel  structure  as  the  outflow.  The  residence  time  of 
water  varied  seasonally,  being  242  days  for  summer/fall  and  26  days  for  winter/spring. 
During  peak  spring  melt,  April  7  1988,  the  residence  time  of  water  in  the  pond  was  less  than 
1  day. 

Water  temperatures  of  the  pond  varied  seasonally  from  near  0°C  in  late  winter  to  30°C  in 
mid  summer  (Fig.  3).  There  was  httle  or  no  thermal  stratification  of  the  pond  water  through 
the  ice  free  season.   Thermal  stratification  began  with  ice  formation  and  was  maintained 

11 


through  the  winter  until  peak  spring  discharge  and  break  up  of  the  ice.  The  ORP  and  DO 
concentrations  of  both  the  surface  and  bottom  water  were  generally  high  throughout  the  ice 
free  season  (Fig,  4),  with  DO  concentrations  periodically  dropping  below  detection  in  the 
bottom  water.  The  bottom  water  became  anoxic  following  winter  ice  cover.  The  DO 
concentrations  in  the  surface  water  (just  below  the  ice)  declined  during  the  ice  cover  period. 
The  entire  water  column  became  anoxic  by  late  March,  just  prior  to  the  spring  melt. 

Temporal  and  depth  variations  in  P  and  N  concentrations  were  related  to  periods  of  ice 
cover  and  thermal  stratification  (Figures  5  and  6).  TF  and  TN  concentrations  were  slightly 
higher  during  the  surmner,  while  minimum  TN  and  TF  concentrations  occurred  after 
increased  runoff  during  the  fall  and  spring.  Concentrations  near  the  siuface  generally 
remained  low  through  the  winter.  The  concentrations  increased  in  the  bottom  water  to  near 
maximum  annual  values  during  early  spring  when  highly  anoxic  conditions  existed.  TON 
and  TUF  were  the  predominant  forms  of  N  and  F,  with  NH4-N  and  TRP  contributing 
significant  amounts  to  the  bottom  water  during  the  winter.  Inorganic  N  and  TRF  remained 
near  detection  limits  throughout  the  ice  free  season.  TRF  concentrations  increased  in  the 
bottom  during  winter  anoxic  conditions.  High  NO3-N  concentrations  occurred  in  the  surface 
water  during  periods  of  snow  melt  and  increased  discharge.  High  levels  of  NH4-N  (>500 
Mg  L"^)  were  observed  in  the  bottom  and  eventually  the  surface  waters  in  the  beaver  pond 
during  the  winter  and  early  spring.  Following  spring  snowmelt,  concentrations  in  the  water 
column  were  at  or  near  minimum  annual  values. 


12 


Monthly  Retention  in  Relation  to  ORP  and  Discharge 

There  is  a  strong  inverse  relationship  between  monthly  retention  of  TP  and  TN  and 
discharge  in  the  beaver  pond  (Figures  7  and  8).  Some  of  the  scatter  in  the  discharge  vs  RT 
relationship  may  be  due  to  interaction  with  temperature  and  redox  condition  of  the  pond 
water.  There  is  a  weak  relationship  between  monthly  retention  and  average  water 
temperature.  Low  average  monthly  ORP  was  associated  with  negative  retention  of  TP  and 
TN  in  Hp4-bp  during  the  winter  months.  There  are  four  months  with  average  ORP  near 
or  below  200mV  in  which  TP  and  TN  retention  is  much  less  than  ice-free  months  with 
similar  or  greater  discharge.  The  lowest  monthly  retention  for  Hp4-bp  occurred  during 
December  1987  and  March  1987  for  TP  and  TN,  respectively.  The  runoff  volume  during 
these  months  was  less  than  half  the  maximum  observed  monthly  runoff  over  the  past  4  years. 

Sediment  P  and  N  Content  and  Burial 

The  quantities  of  TP  and  TN  in  the  top  15  cm  of  sediment  in  Hp4-bp  are  shown  in  Table 
6.  From  core  samples,  the  old  forest  floor  was  readily  distinguishable  by  the  presence  of 
litter,  forest  mosses  and  upland  soil  horizons.  Typically,  7  to  12  cm  of  sediment  had  been 
laid  down  at  the  coring  sites  since  the  pond  was  estabUshed.  Information  from  air  photos 
shows  the  pond  being  formed  between  1960  and  1969.  Based  on  an  accumulation  period 
of  20  to  27  years,  a  net  annual  burial  rate  of  0.15  to  0.55  g  P  m'^  yr'^  and  2.5  to  6.6  g  N  m'^ 
yr'^  was  estimated  from  P  and  N  content  of  sediment  (including  forest  litter)  above  the 
forest  floor  (Table  6). 

13 


DISCUSSION 

Annual  P  and  N  Retention 

Low  annual  TP  and  TN  retention  in  Hp4-bp  appears  to  be  a  relatively  long  term 
phenomenon,  as  no  significant  retention  was  observed  over  5  years,  fi"om  1983/84  to 
1987/88,  (Devito  et  al.  1989,  Devito  1989).  P  and  N  mass  balances  for  Hp4-bp  appear  to 
contradict  the  limited  published  data  on  beaver  ponds  (Naiman  and  MeUllo  1984,  Maret 
et  al.  1987).  Reduction  in  phosphorus  and  organic  material  has  also  been  reported  ia  water 
below  retention  reservoirs  and  in  stream  debris  dams  (Schreiber  et  al.  1981,  Bilby  1981, 
Naiman  et  al.  1986).  How  then  may  the  results  from  this  study  be  extrapolated  to  other 
ponds  in  the  southern  Shield  area  and  other  geographical  regions? 

The  influence  of  Hp4-bp  on  waterbome  N  retention  appears  to  be  similar  to  beaver  ponds 
on  the  Precambrian  Shield  in  Quebec  studied  by  Naiman  and  Melillo  (1984).  Although  they 
report  a  net  accumulation,  the  majority  of  N  ("95%  of  the  inputs)  passed  through  the  beaver 
pond  complexes.  Considering  the  inherent  uncertainties  in  the  estimates,  no  retention  of 
waterbome  TN  was  detected.  Accumulation  of  N  in  the  pond  sediments  was  attributed 
primarily  to  nitrogen-fixation  in  the  sediments  (Francis  et  al.  1985).  Low  waterbome 
retention  but  large  sediment  standing  stock  of  N  is  similar  to  the  situation  observed  for 
Hp4-bp. 

Maret  et  al.  (1987)  reported  a  positive  retention  of  TP,  NO3  and  TKN  during  the  ice-free 
season  in  a  beaver  pond  complex  in  SE  Wyoming.  However,  nutrient  retention  was  highly 

14 


correlated  with  retention  of  suspended  sediments.  Beaver  dams,  and  debris  dams  in  general, 
have  been  reported  to  reduce  fluvial  erosion  and  increase  retention  of  nutrients  associated 
with  organic  and  mineral  sediments  by  moderating  potential  stream  gradient  (Parker  1986, 
Bilby  1981,  Schreiber  et  al.  1981).  Sediment  loads  of  streams  and  fluvial  erosion  are  of 
minor  importance  in  the  relatively  low  gradient,  headwater  streams  on  the  Shield,  even 
dvuing  peak  snow  melt  (personal  observation).  The  retentive  function  of  beaver  ponds  may 
be  greater  in  high  gradient  systems  with  large  mineral  sediment  loads  where  construction 
of  a  dam  results  in  deposition  of  that  stream  load  (Parker  1986).  Maret  et  al.  (1987)  found 
that  the  beaver  pond  did  not  reduce  nutrient  levels  during  the  summer  when  particulate 
load  and  deposition  were  reduced.  Bilby  (1981)  reports  that  debris  dams  were  less  efficient 
at  retaining  nutrients  during  conditions  of  minimimi  particulate  transport. 

Given  the  strong  seasonal  variation  in  retention,  the  period  of  measurement  may  also  be 
important.  The  beaver  pond  studies  mentioned  previously  were  only  conducted  during  the 
ice  fi"ee  period,  and  in  this  period  the  Hp4-bp  pond  efficiently  retained  P  and  N.  The 
largest  export  of  P  and  N  occurred  during  ice  cover  in  the  winter  and  early  spring.  This 
implies  that  estimates  of  annual  budgets  must  include  continuous  monitoring  through  all 
seasons  rather  than  be  based  on  extrapolations  from  measurements  made  in  some  seasons 
only. 

It  appears  that  Hp4  beaver  pond  primarily  functions  to  transform  inorganic  forms  of  N  and 
P  into  organic  forms  which  are  transported  downstream.  Transformation  of  waterbome 
inorganic  forms  of  P  and  N  to  organic  forms  has  been  suggested  in  several  geographically 

15 


diverse  stream  and  riparian  wetland  ecosystems  (Meyer  et  al.  1981,  Triska  et  al.  1984,  Kemp 
and  Day  1984,  Elder  1985). 

Influence  of  Hydrology  and  Winter  Anoxia  on  P  and  N  Retention 

■r 

Seasonal  patterns  of  nutrient  retention  have  been  reported  for  many  different  wetland  types 
(van  der  VaDc  et  al.  1978,  Klopatek  1978)  but  have  not  been  reported  for  beaver  ponds. 
The  seasonal,  and  thus  annual,  retention  in  Hp4-bp  is  primary  controlled  by  1)  the 
magnimde  of  runoff  and  the  residence  time  of  water  in  the  beaver  pond;  and  2) 
regeneration  of  P  and  N  via  decomposition  and/or  leaching  of  organic  sediments  which 
buffers  the  dilution  of  outflow  concentrations  by  increased  discharge.  The  relatively  long 
period  of  winter  anoxia  plays  a  key  role  in  regeneration  of  P  and  N  and  making  these 
nutrients  available  for  hydrologie  transport. 

It  is  apparent  from  the  data  that  gross  export  and  absolute  retention  of  P  and  N  within  Hp4- 
bp  are  strongly  influenced  by  large  seasonal  variations  in  runoff.  The  hydrology  is  the 
primary  vector  of  transport  for  P  and  N  in  this  beaver  pond.  Seasonal  discharge  varied  over 
four  orders  of  magnitude  while  outflow  concentrations  remained  almost  constant;  thus,  P 
and  N  export  was  directly  proportional  to  stream  discharge.  Runoff  magnitude  greatly 
influences  the  P  and  N  dynamics  because  the  velocity  and  residence  time  of  runoff  govern 
both  the  rate  of  nutrient  uptake  by  various  components  and  the  magnitude  of  flowthrough 
and  flushing  of  nutrients  (Howard-Williams  1985,  Baxter  1977).  Marked  seasonal  variations 
in  runoff  are  characteristic  of  temperate  and  boreal  regions  and  increased  gross  export  and 

16 


reduced  retention  of  elements  with  discharge,  primarily  during  snowmelt,  has  been  reported 
in  many  streams  and  wetiands  (Hill  1988,  Meyer  et  al.  1981,  Elder  1985,  Pierson  1983). 

The  presence  of  a  beaver  pond  is  associated  with  large  alterations  in  stream  hydrology 
(Parker  1986).  Construction  of  the  Hp4-bp  dam  resulted  in  2  orders  magnitude  increase  in 
the  annual  residence  time  of  water  within  the  stream  reach  assuming  the  original  channel 
had  the  same  structure  as  the  outflow.  This  may  greatly  increase  the  autotrophy  in  low 
order  streams  (Naiman  et  al.  1987)  and  greatly  increase  nutrient  retention  within  the  stream 
reach,  as  suggested  by  other  work  on  debris  dams  (Bilby  1981,  Naiman  et  al.  1987). 
However,  an  important  consideration  is  the  timing  of  the  major  processes  of  nutrient  cycling 
with  seasonal  variations  in  runoff  and  nutrient  transport  (Hill  1988).  Biotic  assimilation 
appears  to  exert  some  control  on  P  and  N  retention  in  the  beaver  pond  during  periods  of 
low  flow  when  potential  water  retention  and  residence  times  are  high.  However,  these 
periods  of  high  assimilation  occur  when  nutrient  transport  is  low  and  contribute  httle  to  the 
annual  nutrient  flux.  Throughout  the  winter  and  spring,  increased  runoff,  coupled  with 
limited  pond  storage,  greatly  reduces  the  water  residence  time.  Short  residence  time 
together  with  low  temperatures  further  limits  the  influence  of  ecosystem  production  on 
surface  water  concentrations.  Thus,  it  appears  that  a  large  portion  of  the  annual  P  and  N 
input  may  rapidly  bypass  biological  and  abiotic  cycling.  About  90  percent  of  the  aimual 
runoff  and  80  percent  of  the  annual  P  and  N  inputs  and  outputs  to  the  pond  occurred  during 
the  winter  and  spring  resulting  in  large  through-flow  of  nutrients  and  thus  low  annual 
retention  efficiencies. 


17 


Episodic  events  are  extremely  important  in  the  annual  rates  of  P  and  N  transport  in  to  the 
study  beaver  pond.  Accumulation  of  precipitation  within  a  snow  pack  redistributes  several 
months'  precipitation  into  one  or  a  few  hydrologie  events.  Greater  than  40%  of  the  annual 
input  and  output  in  1987/88  occurred  in  4  sepzirate  winter  and  spring  events.  Estimated 
residence  time  in  Hp4-bp  during  peak  snow  melt  was  less  than  one  day  and  removal  of 
nutrients  from  the  water  column  would  be  restricted  to  instantaneous  reactions.  Greater 
than  50%  of  the  annual  water  and  nutrient  yield  from  many  temperate  and  boreal 
watersheds  has  also  been  reported  to  occur  during  episodic  storms  or  snow  melt  (Meyer  et 
al.  1981,  Pierson  1983,  Scheider  et  aï.  1983,  Schindler  et  al.  1976). 

Inorganic  forms  of  N  and  P  were  efficiently  retained  within  the  pond  through  the  year, 
suggesting  rapid  assimilation  into  a  component  which  is  independent  of  runoff  magnitude. 
Microbes  and  algae  have  been  shown  to  rapidly  assimilate  nutrients  and  may  limit  the 
amoimt  of  available  (non-refractory)  P  and  N  in  the  water  (Davis  and  van  der  Valk  1983, 
Warwick  and  Hill  1988)  and  may  control  short  term  storage  and  transport  of  inorganic  P 
and  N  in  freshwater  wetlands  (Richardson  and  Marshall  1986).  This  may  occur  imdemeath 
ice  (Knowles  and  Lean  1987)  or  at  times  when  plants  are  dormant  and  hydrologie  fluxes 
high  (Atchue  et  al.  1983).  Intense  competition  for  inputs  and  regenerated  N  and  P  by  the 
microbial  community  may  partly  explain  the  efficient  retention  and  transformation  of  TRP 
and  NO3-N  and  the  predominance  of  TUP  and  TON  in  the  pond  water  of  Hp4-bp. 
Microorganisms  are  readily  transported  in  surface  waters  (Richardson  and  Marshall  1986). 
Thus  microbial  TP  and  TN  storage  would  be  influenced  by  the  magnitude  of  runoff  and 


18 


hydraulic  retention  times  and  may  explain  the  high  flowthrough  rates  of  TP  and  TN  in  the 
study  beaver  pond. 

The  low  annual  retention  in  the  study  wetlands  suggests  that  a  large  part  of  the  P  and  N 
assimilated  during  the  growing  season  is  temporary.  Although  submergent  macrophytes  and 
associated  epiphytes  in  the  pond  may  be  very  important  in  removing  P  and  N  directly  from 
the  water,  a  large  portion  of  assimilated  nutrients  is  lost  to  the  water  column  in  the  fall  and 
winter  following  senescence  (Davis  and  van  der  Valk  1983,  Atchue  et  al.  1983). 
Translocation  of  nutrients  from  sediments  by  submergent  vegetation  can  also  function  in 
effectively  recycling  nutrients  from  the  sediments  to  surface  waters,  further  limiting  nutrient 
conservation  by  vegetation  (Richardson  and  Marshall  1986). 

Significant  amounts  of  P  and  N  may  be  regenerated  from  the  accimiulated  organic  matter 
in  the  pond  sediments.  Increased  concentrations  of  DOC  are  associated  with  organic 
decomposition  (Naiman  et  al.  1986),  and  were  observed  during  the  simimer  and  winter  in 
Hp4-bp  (unpubl.  data).  Significant  regeneration  of  P  and  N  tied  up  in  organic  matter 
primarily  by  microbial  mineralization  of  organic  matter  and  indirectly  through  anoxic 
processes,  has  been  measured  in  beaver  ponds  (Dahm  et  al.  1987)  and  other  types  of 
wetlands  (Bayley  et  al.  1985,  Richardson  and  Marshall  1986). 

Anaerobic  conditions  in  Hp4-bp  during  winter  ice  cover  had  a  strong  influence  on  the 
regeneration  and  concentration  of  P  and  N  in  the  pond  water  and  outflow.  Similar 
regeneration  of  NH4-N  and  TP  into  the  surface  waters  of  small  lakes  from  the  water  column 

19 


and  sediments  following  anoxia  induced  by  decomposition  of  organic  matter  during  ice  cover 
and  thermal  stratification  has  been  reported  in  many  water  bodies  in  temperate  and  boreal 
regions  (Carignan  and  Lean  1991,  Mathias  and  Barcia  1980,  Knowles  and  Lean  1987).  A 
buildup  of  reduced  forms  of  N  and  P  in  Hp4-bp  surface  waters  resulted  in  disproportionately 
greater  export  of  NH4-N  relative  to  runoff  and  a  negative  storage  of  NH4-N,  as  well  as  TP, 
during  the  winter  and  early  spring.  Flushing  of  nutrients  from  the  pond  was  evident  by  the 
rapid  reduction  of  P  and  N  concentrations  in  the  water  column  during  spring  melt  in  1987 
and  1988. 

Oxygenated  surface  water  persisted  through  much  of  the  winter.  Significant  amounts  of  NH4 
and  NO3  may  be  consumed  imder  ice  by  nitrification  and  denitrification  and  lost  to  the 
system  as  NO2  or  N2  gas  (Knowles  and  Lean  1987).  However,  nitrification  as  well  as  other 
microbial  respiration  processes  may  also  contribute  to  the  observed  oxygen  depletion  in  the 
surface  waters  and  inhibit  NH4  oxidation  during  ice  cover.  The  maintenance  of  reduced 
conditions  which  extend  to  the  top  of  the  water  column  in  a  shallow  pond  may  greatly  limit 
the  loss  of  gaseous  N  and  result  in  greater  stream  output  of  regenerated  N.  Existence  of 
an  oxygenated  layer  below  the  ice  would  be  controlled  by  the  magnitude  and  periodicity  of 
runoff  into  the  pond. 

Large  exports  of  NH4-N  from  Hp4-bp  as  well  as  other  ponds  in  the  study  area  (Devito  et 
al.  1989)  have  occurred  during  the  winter  over  several  years,  suggesting  that  the  occurrence 
of  highly  reduced  conditions  in  ponds  is  common  in  this  area  of  central  Ontario.  High 
concentrations  of  NH4  were  observed  in  fall  and  winter  below  a  beaver  pond  in  the 

20 


Adirondack  region  of  New  York  (Driscoll  et  al.  1987).  Reduced  forms  of  P  and  N  may  be 
characteristic  of  control  structures  on  streams  (Dahm  et  al.  1987)  and  marshes  during  their 
ice  cover  period  (Lee  et  al.  1975,  Klopatek  1978).  Alteration  of  stream  hydrology  by  a  dam 
facilitates  anaerobic  conditions  of  the  stream  reach.  Neither  the  inflow  or  outflow  stream 
at  Hp4-bp  became  anoxic  (unpubl.  data).  The  dam  results  in  a  dramatic  increase  in  water 
depth  and  reduction  in  water  velocity  necessary  for  ice  formation.  SoUd  ice  cover  forms  an 
efficient  barrier  to  atmospheric  oxygen  and  eliminates  wind  induced  mixing  which  occurs 
during  the  ice  free  period.  This  barrier,  combined  with  increased  water  residence  time, 
results  in  a  greater  potential  for  oxygen  depletion  and  the  build  up  of  reduced  forms  of  P 
and  N.  Isolation  and  limited  mixing  of  oxygenated  cold,  low  density  stream  inflows  with 
deeper  pond  water  as  a  result  of  inverse  thermal  stratification  under  ice  (Bergmann  and 
Welch  1985)  would  further  maintain  anoxic  conditions  through  out  the  winter. 

Sediment  Burial 

The  burial  rates  for  Hp4-bp  are  slightly  lower  but  comparable  to  burial  rates  of  26  g  N  m"^ 
yr''  and  7  g  N  m'^  yr'^  reported  for  a  beaver  inhabited  spring,  in  Oregon,  and  a  beaver  pond 
complex  in  Quebec  (Dodds  and  Castenholz  1988,  Naiman  and  Melillo  1984).  No  P 
accumulation  rates  in  beaver  ponds  have  been  reported.  Although  there  are  large 
uncertainties  associated  with  the  burial  estimates,  long  term  sequestering  of  P  and  N  is 
suggested.  This  contradicts  the  waterbome  budgets  for  1987/88.  The  paradox  between  the 
waterbome  budgets  and  the  large  calculated  sediment  accumulation  rate  may  be  due  to 
either  budget  errors  or  uimieastired  inputs  not  directly  linked  to  hydrology. 

21 


Errors  associated  with  water  and  chemical  budgets  are  so  infrequently  reported  that  it  is 
difficult  to  determine  if  the  errors  associated  with  each  component  in  this  study  are 
reasonable.  The  errors  for  annual  estimates  of  stream  nutrient  flux  in  Hp4-bp  ranged  from 
2  to  11%,  with  most  SD  near  10%.  Elder  (1985)  reported  similar  errors  of  annual  yield 
estimates  for  the  Apalachicola  River  wetland  system,  calculated  from  the  sums  of  squared 
component  SD,  of  5-6%  for  N  and  8-9%  for  P.  Dodds  and  Castenholz  (1988)  report  means 
and  ranges  of  estimates  for  a  N  budget  of  a  pond  and  the  resulting  error  estimates  were 
much  larger  than  calculated  in  this  study.  The  errors  associated  with  the  water  budgets  of 
Hp4-bp  seem  reasonable,  although  perhaps  small  (see  Devito  and  Dillon  1992).  At  95  % 
confidence,  residual  errors  represent  approximately  ±  20%  of  the  inputs.  The  burial  rates 
are  an  order  of  magnitude  greater  than  the  budget  error  estimates  suggesting  that  the  large 
standing  stock  of  P  and  N  in  the  sediments  must  be  derived  from  unmeasured  inputs. 

Groundwater  may  contribute  significantly  to  the  residual  of  the  hydrologie  and  nutrient 
budget  but  was  not  measured.  Using  unit  areal  runoff  estimates  for  the  ungauged  areas  and 
neglecting  deep  groundwater  fluxes  still  resulted  in  a  relatively  good  balance  of  water  and 
CI.  This  fact  and  results  of  other  studies  by  Scheider  et  al.  (1983)  and  McDormel  and 
Taylor  (1987)  in  Harp  4  subcatchment  suggest  that  deep  ground  water  fluxes  are  limited. 
The  greatest  unknown  inputs  originate  fi^om  areas  adjacent  the  pond.  Ungauged  inputs  to 
Hp4-bp  represented  less  than  10%  of  the  total  inputs  limiting  the  error.  Estimates  of  unit 
runoff  and  chemical  concentration  from  small  upland  streams  adjacent  the  pond  appear  to 
give  reasonable  estimates  of  nutrient  yield  (Devito  and  Dillon  1992). 


22 


There  are  several  other  possible  sources  which  were  not  measured.  Construction  of  a  dam 
greatly  increases  the  area  of  flooded  soils.  Rates  of  N-fixation  in  similar  sediments,  based 
primarily  on  the  ice  free  season,  range  from  0.4  to  6.0  gNm"^/yr"^  and  approximate  the  net 
burial  rates  in  Hp4-bp  (Francis  1985,  Dodds  and  Castenholz  1988,  Howarth  et  aL  1988). 
However,  these  rates  would  vary  seasonally  and  measured  rates  of  denitrification  for 
temperate  and  subarctic  streams,  ponds  and  lakes  are  well  within  the  rates  of  N-fixation 
(Dodds  and  Castenholz  1988,  Seitzinger  1988).  There  are  no  analogous  microbial  activities 
which  could  account  for  the  large  accumulation  of  P.  Litter  inputs  from  vegetation  adjacent 
the  pond  have  been  reported  to  contribute  very  httle  to  the  P  and  N  budget  of  beaver  ponds 
and  probably  could  not  account  for  the  large  burial  (Naiman  and  Melillo  1984,  Dodds  and 
Castenholz,  Devito  et  al.  1989). 

It  is  important  to  recognize  the  dynamic  nature  of  beaver  ponds  and  the  beavers'  influence 
on  the  landscape.  Large  initial  input  from  forest  litter  and  vegetation  would  have  occurred 
as  the  beaver  flooded  the  forested  valley.  Anoxic  conditions  in  the  sediments  may  slow 
decomposition  and  a  considerable  amount  of  the  initially  large  pool  of  P  and  N  may  still 
remain.  This  together  with  leaching  of  P  and  N  from  old  forest  floor  and  weathering  of 
flooded  secondary  minerals  may  result  in  the  large  P  and  N  pool  and  an  overestimation  of 
the  long  term  burial  rates.  In  addition,  beaver  can  actively  transport  large  amounts  of 
material  and  this  can  represent  an  important  input  from  the  adjacent  upland  into  the  pond 
sediments  and  stream  (Dodds  and  Castenholz  1988,  Naiman  and  Melillo  1984). 


23 


It  is  apparent  that  construction  of  a  dam  and  beaver  activity  greatly  increase  the  amount  of 
organic  and  mineral  materials  which  are  hydrologically  linked  to  the  outflow  stream 
(Naiman  et  al.  1987),  This  "reservoir"  of  P  and  N  may  be  mobilized  representing  a  low  rate 
but  long  term  source  of  nutrients  to  the  pond  water  and  downstream  locations  (Baxter 
1977). 

CONCLUSION 

The  results  presented  here  help  to  clarify  the  relative  importance  of  beaver  ponds  to  the 
water  chemistry  of  small  headwater  streams  of  the  Precambrian  Shield.  Beaver  ponds  are 
not  efficient  at  retaining  waterbome  TP  and  TN  within  a  stream  reach  on  an  aimual  basis. 
Because  of  the  large  throughput  of  water  and  dissolved  material,  absolute  rates  of  retention 
may  be  difficult  to  detect  due  to  inherent  tmcertainties  of  the  budgets.  The  need  for  error 
estimates  is  paramount  in  interpretation  of  budget  residuals  and  is  stressed  in  this  study. 

The  magnitude  of  runoff  and  water  residence  time  within  the  pond  had  the  greatest 
influence  on  seasonal  export  and  retention  of  TP  and  TN.  As  a  consequence,  limited 
retention  of  nutrients  may  occur  in  small  beaver  dams  in  regions  with  little  stream  sediment 
yield  and  especially  during  high  flows  (Baxter  1977).  The  low  annual  retention  of  nutrients 
in  the  beaver  pond  may  be  representative  of  other  small  headwater  wetlands  in  the 
Precambrian  Shield  which  are  centrally  located  in  catchment  depressions  and  receive  large 
flowthrough  of  water  and  nutrients  from  the  surrounding  uplands. 


24 


The  hydrologie,  geochemical  and  biotic  processes  interact  in  complex  ways  as  biotic  and 
geochemical  cycling  vary  seasonally  with  the  time  and  magnitude  of  water  and  nutrient 
transport.  Most  studies  have  focused  on  the  physical  effects  of  debris  dams  on  water 
velocity  and  physical  retention  in  a  reach  (Bilby  1981,  Maret  et  al.  1987,  Naiman  et  al.  1986); 
however,  construction  of  Hp4-bp  dam  created  the  hydrological  conditions  for  ice  cover  and 
long  periods  of  anoxia  which  were  important  in  the  seasonal  and  annual  P  and  N  dynamics 
of  the  stream  reach.  Since  beaver  ponds  may  be  important  areas  for  trapping  and 
processing  organic  matter,  more  work  should  focus  on  the  importance  of  these  areas  for 
nutrient  regeneration  and  introduction  into  streams  (Dahm  et  oL  1987).  The  winter  period 
of  high  respiration  and  organic  matter  oxidation  relative  to  primary  production  is  always 
followed  by  extreme  runoff  conditions  during  snowmelt.  The  hydraulic  characteristics  of  the 
beaver  pond  are  such  that  most  of  the  incoming  P  and  N  and  that  accumulated  in  the 
surface  waters  are  flushed  from  the  system,  resulting  in  a  net  efflux  during  the  spring  and 
low  annual  retention  of  P  and  N. 

From  a  landscape  perspective,  greater  export  of  nutrients  via  runoff  to  downstream 
ecosystems  may  occur  in  headwater  catchments  with  beaver  ponds  than  imaltered 
catchments.  Burial  rates  suggest  that  P  and  N  accumulated  in  Hp4-bp.  Other  immeasured 
fluxes,  such  as  initial  accumulation  of  flooded  forest  material  and  input  of  organic  matter 
by  beaver,  may  be  very  important  to  the  overall  P  and  N  flux  of  beaver  ponds.  Similar  to 
the  increased  rates  of  organic  matter  export  in  beaver  influenced  streams  in  Quebec 
(Naiman  et  al.  1986),  construction  of  the  dam  greatly  increases  the  wetted  area  and  thus 


25 


increases  the  mass  of  organic  matter  in  contact  with  water  and  accessible  to  transport  down 
stream. 

From  a  stream  ecosystem  perspective,  little  P  and  N  retention  may  occur  in  beaver  ponds. 
The  primary  role  of  beaver  ponds  may  be  to  transform  P  and  N,  reducing  the  flux  of 
inorganic  nutrients  with  a  concomitant  increase  in  organic  nutrients  to  downstream 
ecosystems.  Microbial  or  algal  populations  which  are  susceptible  to  hydrologie  transport 
may  provide  a  mechanism  which  results  in  flowthrough  of  inorganic  nutrients  in  systems  with 
low  water  retention  and  seasonally  high  ecosystem  flushing.  Low  order  streams  in  the 
Precambrian  Shield  are  consistently  interrupted  by  complex  channel  structures,  such  as 
beaver  dams,  which  may  alter  the  hydrology  and  redox  environments.  This  study,  along  with 
the  work  of  Naiman  et  al.  (1986,  1987),  provides  more  evidence  to  recognize  the  role  of 
beaver  in  current  concepts  of  stream  ecosystem  organization  and  stability  such  as  the  river 
continuvmi  concept  (Vannote  et  al.  1980)  and  nutrient  spiralling  (Elwood  et  al.  1983). 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

The  field  work  could  not  have  been  conducted  without  the  help  of  B.  Anthony  ("bucket  that 
stream"),  A.  Bently,  D,  Elliot,  and  B.  Ferguson  ("6-degrees").  Technical  help  by  many  staff 
members  at  Dorset  Research  Centre  was  invaluable,  notably  L.  Scott,  D.  Evans  and  C. 
Chun.    I  thank  Drs.  A.  Hill  and  R.  Hall  for  comments  on  the  manuscript  and  Renée 


26 


Morrison  for  typing.  Funding  for  the  research  came  from  N.S.E.R.C.  as  a  postgraduate 
scholarship  and  a  grant  from  the  Dorset  Research  Centre,  Ontario  Ministry  of  Environment 
to  K.  Devito. 


27 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Atchue,  J.A.,  F.P.  Day  and  H.G.  Marshall.  1983.  Algal  dynamics  and  nitrogen  and 
phosphorus  cycling  in  a  cypress  stand  in  the  seasonally  flooded  Great  Dismal  Swamp. 
Hydrobiol.  106:  115-122. 

Baxter,  R.M.  1977.  Environmental  effects  of  dams  and  impoundments.  AniL  Rev.  Ecol. 
Syst.  8:  255-283. 

Bayley,  S.E.,  J.  Zoltek,  AJ.  Hermann,  TJ.  Dolan  and  L.  Tortora.  1985.  Experimental 
manipulation  of  nutrient  and  water  in  a  freshwater  marsh:  effects  on  biomass, 
decomposition,  and  nutrient  accumulation.  Limnol.  Oceanogr.  30:  500-512. 

Bergmann,  M.A.  and  H.E.  Welch.  1985.  Spring  Meltwater  mixing  in  small  arctic  lakes. 
Can.  J.  Fish.  Aquat.  Sci.  42:  1789-1798. 

Bilby,  R.E..  1981.  Role  of  organic  debris  dams  in  regulating  the  export  of  dissolved  and 
particulate  matter  from  a  forested  catchment.  Ecol.  62:  1234-1243. 

Carignan,  R.  and  D.R.S.  Lean.  1991.  Regeneration  of  dissolved  substances  in  a  seasonally 
anoxic  lake:  the  relative  importance  of  processes  occurring  in  the  water  column  and 
in  the  sediments.  Limnol.  Oceanogr.  36:  683-707. 


28 


Dahm,  C.N.,  E.H.  Trotter  and  J.R.Sedell.  1987.  Role  of  anaerobic  zones  and  processes  in 
stream  ecosystem  productivity.  In  Chemical  Quality  of  Water  and  the  Hydrologie 
Cycle,  R.C.  Averett  and  D.M.  McKnight  (eds.).  Lewis,  Chelseas,  Michigan,  p.  157- 
178. 

Davis,  C.B.  and  A.G.  van  der  Valk.  1983.  Uptake  and  release  of  nutrients  by  living  and 
decomposing  Typha  glauca  Godr.  tissue  at  Eagle  Lake,  Iowa.  Aquat.  Bot.  16:  75-89. 

Devito,  KJ.  1989.  Waterbome  phosphorus  and  nitrogen  retention  in  some  Precambrian 
Shield  wedands:  the  role  of  hydrology  and  oxidation  -  reduction  potential.  M.Sc. 
Thesis,  Trent  University,  Peterborough,  Ontario.  256  pp. 

Devito,  KJ.,  PJ.  Dillon  and  B.D.  LaZerte.  1989.  Phosphorus  and  nitrogen  retention  in  five 
Precambrian  Shield  wetlands.  Biogeochem.  8:  185-204. 

Devito,  KJ.  and  PJ.  Dillon.  1992.  Errors  in  estimating  stream  discharge  in  small 
headwater  catchments:  Influence  on  interpretation  of  stream  yields  and  input/output 
budget  estimates.  Ont.  Min.  Envir.  Tech.  Report.  DR/92. 

Dillon,  PJ.  and  R.A.  Reid.  1981.  Input  of  biologically  available  phosphorus  by 
precipitation  to  Precambrian  lakes.  In  Atmospheric  Pollutants  in  Natural  Waters, 
S.  Eisenreich  (éd.).  Ann  Arbor  Science,  Aim  Arbor,  p.  183-198. 


29 


Dodds,  W.K.  and  R.W.  Castenholz.  1988.  The  nitrogen  budget  of  an  oligotrophic  cold 
water  pond.  Arch.  Hydrobiol.  4:  343-362. 

Driscoll,  C.T.,  B  J.  Wyskowski,  C.C.  Cosentini  and  M.E.  Smith.  1987.  Processes  regulating 
temporal  and  longitudinal  variations  in  the  chemistry  of  a  low  order  woodland  stream 
in  the  Adirondack  region  of  New  York.  Biogeochem.  3:  225-242. 

Elder,  J.F.  1985.  Nitrogen  and  phosphorus  speciation  and  flux  in  a  large  Florida  river- 
wetland  system.  Wat.  Resourc.  Res.  21:  724-732. 

Elwood,  J.W.,  J.D.  Newbold,  R.V.  O'Neil  and  W.  van  Winkle.  1983.  Resource  spiralling: 
an  operational  paradigm  for  analyzing  lotie  ecosystems.  In  Dynamics  of  lotie 
ecosystems,  T.D.  Fontaine  and  S.M.  Bartell  (eds.).  Ann  Arbor  Sci.  Publ.,  Ann  Arbor, 
p.  3-27. 

Francis,  M.M.,  RJ.  Naiman  and  J.M.  Melillo.  1985.  Nitrogen  fixation  in  subarctic  streams 
influenced  by  beaver  (Castor  Canadensis).  Hydrobiol.  121:  193-202, 

Gorham,  E.,  P.M.  Vitousek  and  W.A.  Reiners.  1979.  The  regulation  of  chemical  budgets 
over  the  course  of  terrestrial  ecosystem  succession.  Ann.  Rev.  Ecol.  Syst.  10:  53-84. 

Hill,  A.R.   1988.  Factors  influencing  nitrate  depletion  in  a  rural  stream.  Hydrobiol.  160: 

111-122. 

30 


Howard- Williams,  C.  1985.  Cycling  and  retention  of  nitrogen  and  phosphorus  in  wetlands: 
a  theoretical  and  applied  perspective.  Freshwat.  Biol.  15:  391-431. 

Howarth,  R.W.,  R.  Marino,  J.  Lane  and  JJ.  Cole.  1988.  Nitrogen  fixation  in  freshwater, 
estuarine,  and  marine  ecosystems.  1.  Rates  and  importance.  Limnol.  Oceanogr.  33: 
669-687. 

Kadlec,  R.H.  and  J.A.  Kadlec.  1979.  Wetland  and  water  quality.  In  Wetland  functions  and 
values:  the  state  of  our  imderstanding,  Greeson,  P.E.,  J.R.  Clark  and  J.E.  Qark 
(eds.).    Am.  Wat.  Resour.  Assoc,  Minneapolis,  MN.  p.  436-456. 

Kemp,  G.P.  and  J.W.  Day  Jr.    1984.   Nutrient  dynamics  in  a  Louisiana  swamp  receiving 
agricultural  runoff.    In  Cypress  Swamps,  K.C.  Eweland  and  H.T.  Odum  (eds.). 
University  Presses  of  Florida,  Gainsville.  p.  286-293. 

King,  D.L.  1985.  Nutrient  cycling  by  wetlands  and  possible  effects  of  water  level.  In 
Coastal  Wetlands,  H.H.  Prinee  and  F.M.  D'ltri  (eds.).  Lewis  Publ.,  Chelsea, 
Michigan,  p.  69-86. 

Klopatek,  J.M.  1978.  Nutrient  dynamics  of  freshwater  riverine  marshes  and  the  role  of 
emergent  macrophyte.  In  Freshwater  Wetlands,  R.E.  Good,  D.F.  Wightman  and 
R.L.  Simpson  (eds.).    Academic  press,  New  York,  p.  195-216. 


31 


Knowles,  R.  and  D.R.S.  Lean.   1987.  Nitrification:  a  significant  cause  of  oxygen  depletion 
under  winter  ice.  Can.  J.  Fish.  Aquat.  Sci.  44:  743-749. 

Lee,  G.F.,  E.  Bently  and  R.  Amundson.    1975.   Effects  of  marshes  on  water  quality.   In 
Coupling  of  land  and  water  systems,  A.D.  Hasler  (éd.).  p.  105-127,  Springer- Verlag, 

N.Y. 

Locke,  BA.    1988.    Quality  control  data  report  for  the  limnology  and  Dorset  Research 
Centre.  Ont.  Min.  Envir.  Data  Report  DR  88. 

Locke,  B.A  and  E.  deGrosbois.     1986.     Meteorological  data  base  for  the  Muskoka- 
Haliburton  area.  Ont.  Min.  Envir.  Data  Report  DR  86. 

Locke,  B.A-  and  L.D.  Scott.  1986.  Smdies  of  lakes  and  watersheds  in  Muskoka-Haliburton, 
Ontario:  Methodology  (1976-1985).  Ont.  Min.  Envir.  Data  Report  DR  86/4. 

Maret,  J  J.,  M.  Parker  and  T.E.  Fanny.  1987.  The  effect  of  beaver  ponds  on  the  nonpoint 
source  water  quality  of  a  stream  in  southwestern  Wyoming.  Wat.  Res.  21:  263-268. 

Mathias,  J.A.  and  J.  Barcia.    1980.   Factors  controlling  oxygen  depletion  in  ice  -  covered 
lakes.  Can.  J.  Fish.  Aquat.  Sci.  37:  185-194. 


32 


McDonnell,  J  J.  and  C.H.  Taylor.  1987.  Surface  and  subsurface  water  contributions  during 
snowmelt  in  a  small  Precambrian  Shield  watershed,  Muskoka,  Ontario.  Atmos. 
Ocean  25:  251-266. 

Meyer,  J.L,  G.E.  Likens  and  J.  Sloane.  1981.  Phosphorus,  nitrogen  and  organic  carbon  flux 
in  a  headwater  stream.  Arch.  Hydrobiol.  91:  28-  44. 

Mood,  A.M.,  FA.  Graybill  and  D.C.  Boes.  1974.  Introduction  to  the  Theory  of  Statistics 
(3rd  éd.).  McGraw  -  Hill,  New  York,  564p. 

Naiman,  RJ.  and  J.M.  MeliUo.  1984.  Nitrogen  budget  of  a  subarctic  stream  altered  by 
beaver  {Castor  canadensis).  Oecologia  62:  150-155. 

Naiman,  RJ.,  J.M.  Melillo  and  J.E.  Hobbie.  1986.  Ecosystem  alteration  of  boreal  forest 
streams  by  beaver  {Castor  canadensis).  Ecology  67:  1254-1269. 

Naiman,  RJ.,  J.M.  MeUllo,  MA.  Lock,  T.E.  Ford  and  S.R.  Reice.  1987.  Longitudinal 
patterns  of  ecosystem  processes  and  community  structure  in  a  subarctic  river 
continuum.  Ecology  68:  1139-1156. 

Ontario  Ministry  of  the  Environment.  1981.  Outlines  of  analytical  methods.  Ont.  Min. 
Envir.,  Water  Research  Branch,  Rexdale,  Ontario.  246  pp. 


33 


Paivanen,  J.   1969.  The  bulk  density  of  peat  and  its  determination.  Silva  Fennica  3:  1-19. 

Parker,  M.  1986.  Beaver,  water  quality,  and  riparian  systems.  Proceedings  Wyoming  Water 
and  Stream  Zone  Conference,  Wyoming  Water  Res.  Centre,  Univ.  Wyoming, 
Laramie,  WY.  p.  88-94. 

Pierson,  D.C.  1983.  The  role  of  hydrology  and  chemical  processes  in  determining  export 
from  a  low  relief  wetland  watershed.  M.Sc.  Thesis,  Trent  University,  Peterborough, 
Ontario.  211  pp. 

Richardson,  CJ.  and  P.E.  Marshall.  1986.  Processes  controlling  movement,  storage,  and 
export  of  phosphorus  in  a  fen  peatland.  Ecol.  Monogr.  56:  279-302. 

Scheider,  W.A.,  J  J.  Moss  and  P  J.  Dillon.  1979.  Measurement  and  uses  of  hydraulic  and 
nutrient  budgets,  p.  77-83.  Jn  Restoration:  proceed.  Nat.  Conf.,  Aug  22-24  1978, 
Minneapolis,  Minnesota.  U.S.  EPA  440/5-79-001,  Washington. 

Scheider,  W.A,  CM.  Cox  and  CD.  Scott.  1983.  Hydrological  data  for  lakes  and 
watersheds  in  the  Muskoka-Haliburton  study  area  (1976  -  1980).  Ont.  Min.  Envir. 
Data  Report  DR  83/6. 


34 


Schindler,  D.W.,  R.W.  Newbury,  KLG.  Beaty  and  P.  CampbeU.  1976.  Natural  water  and 
chemical  budgets  for  a  small  Precambrian  lake  basin  in  central  Canada.  J.  Fish.  Res. 
Bd.  Can.  33:  2526-. 

Schreiber,  J.D.,  D.L.  Rausch  and  A,  Olness.  1981.  Phosphorus  concentrations  and  yields 
in  agricultural  runoff  as  influenced  by  a  small  detention  reservoir.  In  Proceedings 
of  the  Symposium  on  Surface  Water  Impoundments,  H,  H.G.  Stefan  (éd.).  American 
Society  of  Civil  Engineers,  New  York. 

Seitzinger,  S.P.  1988.  Denitrification  in  freshwater  and  coastal  marine  ecosystems: 
ecological  and  geochemical  significance.  Limnol.  Oceanogr.  33:  702-724. 

Skoog,  D.A,  and  D.M.  West.  1976.  Fundamentals  of  analytical  chemistry.  Holt,  Reimhart 
and  Winston,  Toronto,  Ont.  804  pp. 

Stanton,  M.P.,  MJ.  Capel  and  F.  Armstrong.  1977.  The  chemical  analysis  of  fresh  water. 
Misc.  Spec.  Publ.  No.  25,  Department  of  Envir.,  Fisheries  and  Marine  Service, 
Winnipeg.   119  pp. 

Thomthwaite,  C.W.  1948.  An  approach  toward  a  rational  classification  of  climate.  Geogr. 
Rev.  33:  55-94. 


35 


Triska,  FJ.,  J.R.  Sedell,  K  Cormack,  S.V.  Gregory,  F.M.  McCorison.    1984.    Nitrogen 
budget  for  a  small  coniferous  forest  stream.  Ecol.  Monogr.  54:  119-140. 

van  der  Valk,  A.G.,  C.B.  Davis,  J.L.  Barker  and  CE.  Beer.    1978.    Natural  freshwater 
wetlands  as  nitrogen  and  phosphorus  traps  for  land  runoff.  In  Wetland  functions  and 
values:  the  state  of  our  understanding,  P.E.  Greeson,  J.R.  Qark  and  J.E.  Clark  (eds.). 
Am.  Wat.  Resourc.  Assoc,  Minneapolis,  MN.  p.  457-467. 

Vannote,  R.L.,  G.W.  MinshaU,  K.W.  Cummins,  J.R.  SedeU  and  CE.  Cushing.   1980.  The 
river  continuum  concept.  Can.  J.  Fish.  Aquat.  Sci.  37:  130-137. 

Warwick,  J.  and  A.R.  Hill.     1988.    Nitrate  depletion  in  the  riparian  zone  of  a  small 
woodland  strejun.  Hydrobiol.  157:  231-240. 

Winter,  T.C  1981.  Uncertainties  in  estimating  the  water  balance  of  lakes.  Wat.  Res.  Bull. 
17:  82-115. 

Zobell,  CE.    1946.    Studies  on  redox  potential  of  marine  sediments.    Bull.  Am.  Assoc. 
Pertol.  Geol.  30:  477-513. 


36 


+ 

u 
a 

V 

© 


u 

« 

g 

"§ 

8 

CO 

^ 

&> 

•o 

•o 

^ 

V 

a> 

u 

a 

o 
E 

_o 

&> 

_o 

£ 

JO 

_o 

3 

o 

'G 

"3 

u 

w 

o 

•a 

ce 

u 

u 

J 

^ 

o 

® 

o" 

a 

« 

« 

1m 

O 

•o 

o 

_o 

_g 

•o 

o 

s 

4> 

o 

s 

JO 

S 

3 

1 

(0 

3 

J 

IM 

1 
"re 

u 

3 
U 

1 
"re 

3 

u 

re 
-o 

2 
u 

o 

t3 

3 

•o 
2i 

c 

1 

a 
.g 

o 

"o 
u 

•o 
o 

"03 

a 

CO 

8 

B 

1 

1 

B 

B 
O 

t^ 

>-^ 

o; 

^ 

« 

s 

t/3 

Crt 

o 

• 

c 

u 

B 

^ 

<D 

U 

so 

"5 

o 

M 

ce 

b< 

.SP 

SO 

^ 

B 

ra 

*N 

o 

^ 

& 

JJ 

3 

.3 

'■5 

^ 

JO 

jg 

c 

"5 

JO 

R 

IS 

•o 

•o 

'0 

'D 

JS 

>% 

'G 

J3 

■^ 

cd 

"G 

'G 

< 

< 

a. 

I 

< 

H 

S 

< 

< 

> 
u 


60 

a. 


<e 

a. 


a. 


ce 

.J 

60 


X 

z 


ce 

.J 

60 

a. 


O 

z 


ce 

60 

a. 


60 

E 


60 

E 


> 

s 


o     § 


a. 
oi 
O 


3 

■o 

8 

o 


eo 

B 

< 


U3 


«I 

■*^ 
U 

E 
cs 

a. 


O 

JS 

o. 

i/i 

W2 

3 

o 

o. 

10 

O 

a 
u 

Ui 

O 

u 
E 

O 

ee 

o. 

b« 

ce 
eu 

ce 

5 

p 

o 

o 

H 

H 

E 

3 

'E 
o 
E 
E 
< 


rt  f^  .-I  .-H 


B  .Si, 


e 

u 

60 

o 

b 

•E 

e 
u 

t/3 

3 

2 
ce 

^ 

[2 

E 
4^ 

0 

u 
0 
^ 

B 
0 

•o 

0 

E 

C- 

2P 

JS 

ce 

(/: 

0 

u 

•a 

0 

u 

0 

tM 

i? 

u 

u 

Cl 

CO 

^ 

^ 

JO 

> 

X 

Dh 

Q. 

fi 

■3 

0 

0 
2 

"3 

0 
•0 

E 

U 

2 
0 

2 

0 

H 

U 

Û 

Oi 

E 

■•5 
0 

H 

H 

(S 

rN 

d 

(<i 

00 

<s 

(N 

t-- 
r- 


Dorse! 
Rexdal 

rset 
1981) 

B 

ON 

0  ^-' 

CO 

N.-X 

Û  tu 

vy 

t/3 

0     0 

u-'S 

E 

0 

^ 

CO     W 

k.        L. 

ic 

0 

0        0 

ti     0 

<— 

-0 

Xi   X3 

3  <-> 

-0 

B 

_2  _2 

'^   c 

0 

CO 

U  U 

0    u 

1= 

§> 

0  0 

03  Di 

0 
2 

0 
00 

® 


o 

*i> 

CO 

BO 

U 

ta 

< 

Q 

CO 

»-i 

■H 

u 

a 

u 

>> 

u 

'Sb 

^ 

"o 

u 

"O 

>, 

J= 

00 

00 

r- 

00 

0\ 

ïH 

u 

M 

4-1 

IM 

o 

cs 

•V 

a 

o 

o. 

V3 

Im 

3 

U 

n< 

> 
«J 

u 

3 

o 

J2 

A 

■* 

WÎ 

a. 

3 

CS 

Q- 

K 

_Ç 

Lm 

«: 

«2 

3 

0^ 

« 

V5 

u 

u 

c 

Ui 

(5 

R< 

0) 

"W 

^ 

X! 

o 

^-^ 

3 

rJ 

^ 

"03 
> 

bC 

u 

_> 

'^ 

u 

o 

."H 

o. 

CS 

S 

•o 

u 

8 

CQ 

•o 

e 

of 

CQ 

3 

.^^ 

O. 

S 

3 
O 

Im 

V 

o 

V3 

5 

3 

? 

CI. 

c 

"« 

*•" 

3 

l« 

S 
C 

3 

CQ 

V3 

T3 

e 

O. 

CQ 

o 

^^ 

kri 

i 

B 

o 

3 

(0 

■2 

u 

"3 

1/1 

XI 

o 

> 


3 

S" 
3 

O 


CQ 

3 
O 

H 


8     3 

so 


CQ 

CO 


_B 

U 

U 

ÛC 

QB 

8 

CQ 

CQ 

Im 

^ 

O 

u 

00 

^ 

o 

E 

£ 

CQ 

U 

L> 

C/2 

c 
o 


o 


o 

b 

•a 
u 

60 

3 
CQ 
bO 

c 
D 


o 
E 

E 

CQ 
U 

J5 


•a 

8 

O 

Cl. 

Tf 

u 

o. 

^ 

w 

« 

CQ 

o 

X 

CQ 

o 


0\ 

o 


^0 


£ 

E 

3 


ri 

d 


S 


S 


«o 


00 


?i 

« 

a 

+1 

■H 

■H 

g 

^ 

9^ 

.^        00        ^ 


■H 


1—1 
+ 


<s 


^t-         C*l         CT\ 

^  ^  ^ 


00 

s 

^ 

+1 

-H 

-H 

(S 

m 

(S 

00 

s 


bO 

.s 


^ 


o 


fS 


+ 


^ 

Pi 

00 

m 

+1 

•M 

■H 

-H 

■H 

U-1 

1-1 

i 

g 

(S 


^ 

1-H 

fi 

1-1 

+1 

-H 

■H 

■H 

î 

i 

CQ 

3 
8 
8 
CQ 


1-H 

•^ 

r^ 

^ 

S 

O 

o 

i-H 

O 

+1 

O 

o 

■H 

o 

-H 

C5 
■H 

•H 

-H 

(S 

00 

^ 

^ 

O 

O 

1—1 

O 

(3> 

o 

o 

o 

O 

V 

o 

o 

È 

1— 1 

1-H 

V 

o 

o 

o 

<=5 

■» 

+1 

-H 

-t-l 

-H 

s 

ON 

l-H 

^. 

?i 

1-H 

o 

ez> 

1-H 

<s 

rr, 

O  ^H  ^H  1-H 

O        P        p        C3 


V 

o 

O 

o 

■H 

■H 

+1 

+1 

8 

S 

s 

s 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

1> 

."H 

Ë 

t-l 

o 

Ë 

.« 

e 

*Lri 

J= 

3 

(/3 

S 

•5 

ex 

u 

(S 

o 
o 
■» 
r) 

o 


o 

o 

V 

1-1 
o 

s 

1—1 

1-H 

+\ 

o 

c> 

<o 

O 

1-H 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

o 
o 

1-H 

o 

1-H 

^ 

V 

o 

o 

d 

d 

1— ( 
o 

O 

S 

00 

1-H 

S 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

o 

1—1 

o 

S 

o 

d 

1-H 

1-i 

f<S 

CQ 

3 
8 
8 

CQ 


a 

o 
o 

u 


3 
3 

o 


3 
CI. 

c 


ë 


JO 


OS  ^ 


3  3 


o 

H 


e 
o 


u 


o 
E 
•o 

3 


o 
E 

E 

U 


^  e 

O  u. 


S 

R 

?5 

1 

i 

^ 

ÎS 
«? 

d 

d 

S 

cs 

44 

•H 

•H 

00 

M 

•H 

r-l 

-H 

00 

•H 

•H 

c4 

1 

1 

% 

es 

>-( 

f^ 

r- 

f~ 

V 

d 

d 

d 

d 

+t 

•H 

■H 

+) 

-H 

>n 

O 

O 

o 

»H 

d 

O 

<M 

■<!»• 

S 

t^ 

•t 

fT) 

•0 

O 

d 

d 

o 

■H 

■H 

+< 

■H 

00 

«^ 

Ov 

W-1 

i-i   >-i   O 


o  V  '^-  '^ 

d  ^^  °  <= 

^  ^  -H  +) 

O  o  «^  t^ 

d  V  d  d 


d 

-H 

On 

d 


E 

E  s 


(S 

3 
S 
B 

93 


in  ON  r-;  vn 

o  d  ^'  •*' 

4(  -H  +1  +1 

f<^  -1  •*.  f~: 

^  3  ?5  S 


+1 


d 

10 

d 

P 

00 

(S 

ON 
00 

SO 
On 

-H 

■H 

■H 

■H 

+1 

-H 

+< 

+< 

■H 

+( 

N© 

NO 

00 

in 

06 

1—1 

N© 

00 

«S 

o  r~  >o  00 

■r^  d  à  à 

M  M  M  M 

On  NO  On  »-< 

en  ri  '-!  fO 


o 

V 


+) 


o 

V 


n 

'^. 

rr> 

10 

d 

1-H 

NO 

NO 

■H 

+) 

■H 

-H 

«S 

<? 

(<^ 

rH 

d 

1^ 

NO 

00 

0 

0 

*/^ 

NO 

fN» 

On 

fNl 

fS 

P 

r-. 

«S 

^ 

^ 

«s 

NO 

NO 

0 

0 

1-^ 

1-î 

•H 

41 

41 

•H 

■H 

-H 

41 

44 

M 

41 

<S 

00 

00 

NO 

■* 

NO 

00 

r4 

On 

06 

•*■ 

00 

(S 

S 

I 


u 

E 

h- 
0 

00 

E 

3 

,<« 

C 

•5 

0. 

3 
C 
S 


u 

9 


a 


u 

_> 

B 

_2 

O 

"03    ,-, 

■^ 

BJ^ 

u 

u 

02 

u  ^^ 

^^  «^ 

3    3 

Ô   O 

M       1 

X)    c 

<  !:::. 

3 
O, 

3 

O 


00  E 


o 


B 
O 


o 

E 

•o 
o 

3 
CC 
60 

B 

D 


o 
E 


«I 


C/D 


V3 

3 

o 
«  a 

O    k. 

ja   o 


^1 


•* 
fo 


CO 

00 

•*. 

t~ 

»-i 

1-Î 

en 

o\ 

-H 

-H 

M 

-H 

>ri 

\Ci 

00 

(S 

«i-i 

o 

p^ 

0\ 

o 

d 

+1 

■H 

+1 

■H 

«3 

t<1 

00 

vo 

■<r 

VO 

d 

d 

d 

d 

-H 

+) 

+1 

-H 

t~ 

00 

r~ 

lO 

>o 

C<S 

H 

■*■ 

p 

0\ 

in 

+1 

+) 

+1 

+1 

1— ( 

d 

o 

00 

1— ( 

T-H 

s 

3 


U 


oo 

B       "C 
•5        O- 


d 


-H 


Os 


(S 


rn 

"^ 

0\ 

r- 

tn 
0\ 

rH 

rH 

CM 

00 

+1 

+) 

•H 

+1 

+1 

Tt 

m 

rH 

W-1 

>o 

c4 

«s 

1-1 

rH 

(S 

^2 

rH 
rH 

■H 


o 

V 

+1 

d 

r-î 

SO 

iri 

rH 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

d 

V 

d 

00 

rH 

On 

0\ 

oo' 

+) 

00 
\6 

00 


s 
s 
s 


o 

_> 

'^rf 

to 

C3 

s^ 

_o 

a 

o 

u 

Oi 

u  ^^ 

a    3 

■Ô  O 

«    1 

^   c: 

<!=- 

? 

4^ 

o 

3 
Q, 

E 

3 

P 

o 

V 

La 

C/2 

o 

H 


e 
o 


5 

o 

E 

T5 
U 

bC 

3 
CO 

eo 

c 

3 


I 
E 

(0 

u 

55 


e 
u 

00   _ 

°   Ë 


00 


S    =r 


g 

s 

S 

d 

o 

o 

•H 

■H 

■H 

ë 

S 

S 

s 


o 
d 

•H 


O 

d 

V 

«H 

O 

d 

8 

d 

o 

+) 

+4 

■» 

■H 

1-H 
O 

S 

^ 

^ 

O 

O 

S 

S 

d 

o 

d 

d 

■H 

44 

+4 

+4 

S 

gî 

u 

z 

E 

T 

.     E 

I 

3 
tf3 

z 

u 


ao 
^      c 


00 


d 

44 

d 


d 

+4 

?2 


O 

d 

44 

d 


8 

1-1 

1-1 

VO 

§ 

\o 

t-4 

O 

S 

S 

§ 

d 

c5 

o 

d 

44 

•H 

41 

44 

O 

1-H 

1—4 

S 

o 

d 

V 

1—1 
o 

iH 
O 

S 

44 

d 

O 

o 

1-H 

44 

44 

44 

O 

r- 

00 

O 

d 

o 

T—t 

lo 

V 

d 

d 

d 

iH 

O 

o 

8 

d 

8 

d 

d 

+4 

44 

44 

44 

o 

—H 

d 

00 

1—1 

d 

d 

d 

o 
d 

1-H 

O 

d 

1— < 
o 
d 

1—1 
o 
d 

S 

d 

O 

d 

o 
d 

o 
d 

«s 

o 
d 

44 

44 

44 

44 

44 

44 

44 

44 

44 

O 

S 
d 

S 

d 

O 
1— f 

d 

d 

o 

1— « 
d 

d 

1—1 

d 

•3 

3 
& 
C 


1 

3 


e 

E 

3 


"     .S 


11- 

d 


S 


d 

44 


d 

44 

00 

m 


o 

—H 

f^ 

m 

d 

1-H 

r~ 

E; 

O 

o 

o 

V 

O 

o 

O 

d 

d 

d 

44 

d 

d 

d 

44 

44 

44 

1-H 

44 

44 

44 

—H 

vH 

1-H 

iH 

<S 

1-H 

O 

(S 

8 

9S 

o 

O 

O 

O 

O 

O 

d 

O 

o 

d 

d 

d 

o 

d 

d 

V 

d 

d 

d 

o 

o 

1-H 

d 

1-H 

(S 

t<i 

f<^ 

d 

O 

1-H 

C3 

S 

V 
41 

O 

o 

o 

o 

V 

d 

O 

o 

o 

d 

d 

d 

o 

44 

V 

d 

d 

o 

1-H 

44 

44 

44 

44 

44 

44 

44 

44 

O 

d 

8 

1-H 

00 

1-H 

^ 

O 

d 

S 

1-H 

^ 

^ 

V 

d 

d 

d 

d 

V 

d 

d 

d 

d 

3 
S 
B 

ta 


u 

> 

te 

a 

^^ 

_o 

B 

u 

■fc^ 

u 

OJ 

O    ,— V 

-«->    •*-' 

3     3 

■3   0 

w       1 

X)     C 

<   ti- 

^ 

^ 

0 
10 

^ 

s 

g 

0 

0 

0 

0 

-H 

-H 

+) 

+) 

S 

S 

^ 

S 

0 

0 

0 

ci 

S 


00 

1-1 

c5 
+1 


00 

^ 

0 

0 

00 

0 

iS 

0 

0 

0 

0 

•H 

■H 

■H 

-H 

S 

g 

5 

o 
+1 

o 


? 

.,_, 

0 

3 

a. 

E 

3 

S 

0 

es 

b« 

-*-* 

C/2 

0 
0 

0 

S 

V 

0 

0 

■H 

■H 

■H 

\o 

1-H 

m 

0 

(<1 

r- 

0 

0 

d 

00 
o 
d 

•H 


O 

ri 


0 
0 

1-H 
0 

2 

0 

V 

d 

d 

d 

M 

+1 

■H 

-H 

§ 

Ç 

1-H 

?^ 

d 

d 

1H 

ri 

00 
o 
d 

■H 

00 

as 


•o 
u 

3 

_£ 

•«^ 
C 
O 
u 


o 


o 
E 

u 

OC 

S 
CO 

00 

B 

3 


o 
E 

E 

u 

V2 


d 

S 

0 

d 

1-1 
d 

-H 

+1 

-H 

■H 

1-H 

d 

d 

d 

1-4 

0 
d 

V 

d 

d 

■H 

■H 

+) 

d 

d 

10 

0 

d 

1-H 

d 

1—1 
0 

8 

0 

1—1 
1—1 

d 

d 

d 

d 

+1 

+1 

+1 

+1 

0 

1— t 

S 

d 

d 

d 

0 

B 
U 

E 

60 

_B 

£  E 

z 

E 

-M 

B 

ht 

•-   0 

0 

3 

S 

f 

0. 
«3 

Z  11, 

H 

O 

+f 

ON 


00 

o 
d 

•H 

00 


1—1 

d 


o 


w 

3 
B 
B 


S 

S 

0 

d 

d 

d 

■H 

■H 

+1 

S 

P 

d 

d 

1-H 

o      p 
V      o     o 


0\ 

o 


o 
d 


■H 


O 

d 


+) 


o 


•H 


O 


1-H 
0 

8 
0 

S 

d 

1—1 
1—1 

d 

■H 

+1 

+1 

+1 

d 

?3 

d 

d 

u 

E 

E 
3 


=3         3         v^ 

f«     '5      Ç- 


o 
+1 

00 


S 

g 

S 

S 

S 

(S 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

■H 

■H 

■H 

■H 

■H 

+) 

■H 

■H 

+1 

+1 

0 

(S 

0 

rri 

0 

S 

>0 

1-1 

?3 

Î5 

25 

?5 

p 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

d 

1-H 

O 

1-H 

d 
+1 

?5 


1-H 

d 
+1 

^H 

ri 


C3 
3 
B 
B 
ce 


u 

>% 

u 

•5b 
_o 

o 

•a 
>> 

ja 

00 
00 

r~- 

00 
0\ 

»— I 

o 


C 

o 

u 

> 

U 


es 

X 

£ 
o 


o 

B 

•a 

B 


e 
o 

O 


C 


O 

c 

«2 

c 

c 

•o 
c 
ee 

e 
o 


u 
w 

u 
eg 


O 
S 


■A 


•o 
o 


CO  2 

§  \o" 

2« 

u 

o 

Û 

si 

o. 

< 

April 

1988 

Winter 
Spring 

^ 

ÎÏ 

1^ 

V2 

Annual 

1987/88 

f<^ 


^ 


so 


^ 

s. 


?3 


^ 


^ 


o 

<s 

^-N 

c^ 

CO 


m  ^^ 

^  <> 

■^  ^ 

-^^ 

>o 

ON 

r». 

r^. 

OS 


r4 

00 


o 


(S 


rr\    fO 

^  00 


00  £^ 


n 


r-    00 
00     c~ 


g 


o^  -r> 

fS      '-N 

--^ 

f^  ^ 

to 

(S 

1^ 

(N 

U-)   ro     l~- 


I 


5 


1— ( 

<c 

>, 

^^-^ 

3 

a 

tA.4 

C 

D 

o 

c 

C 

2 

3 

OS 

ê 

U 

s 

u 
u 

c 

u  ,_^ 


ai 


O 

o 

o 
.s 
a. 


o 
H 


o 

e- 


o 
o. 

E 


o 
o. 


Figiire  1 


C/) 

Q 

2 

>- 

o 

Qi 

D. 

< 

Q 

q: 

O 
O 

^_ 

2 

^ 

03 

5 

O 

m 

m 

in 

4 

t— 

2 

^^ 

rj LlJ 

CO 

Q. 

2 

on 

2 

(— 

< 

û: 

*^                    ( 

< 

S 

1— 

/                      \ 

O 

U) 

c/n 

< 


CO 


Figure  2 


\ 


(V 


\  ^     / 


00 

•^  bJ 

Ld 

1— 

LUO 

(U 

E 

00 

ooo 

> 

D 

LJ 
_l 

"a 

i— 

E 

Cl 

(X)I\ 

1^  i- 
cu  O 

> 

o 

2 

ÛO0O 

-^  u 

D 

o 

< 

C/0 

O)  CT) 

o  cu 
5:û: 

CN 

Figure  3 

a) 


CD 
> 

CD 


CD 
"5 


4 


5  - 


2  - 


1   - 


Harp    4    Beaver   Pond 


0 


- 

top    of   main    dam 

; 

o 

'•• 

■•      :  ■  ■  •■- 

_ 

0:0 

V       '\; 

I 

I 

^ 

^v„ 

^ 

V 

^ ^ \ \ 1 

1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 

1 — i — 1 

■■ 

H H 

200 


-  150 


-  100 


v> 


0 


o 


50       ^ 
o 


3 

o 


FMAMJ     JASONDJ     FMAMJ 


0.0 


0.2  - 


0.5  - 


Q_ 
Ld 

Q 


1.0   - 


1.2 


FMAMJ     JASONDJ     FMAMJ 

1987  1988 


Figure  4 


~\/6lU         UaBXxQ     p9A|OSSIQ 


AUJ      |D!|U840d    X0a3d 


Figure  5 


OO 
CO 
G) 


00 


l/6n 


n/6n 
snojoqdsoqd    |D|0J_ 


Figure  6 


surface   0.5m 
bottom    1.0m 


FMAMJ  JASONDJ  FMAMJ 


1987 


1988 


J 


Figure  7 


./. 


M- 


ro 


m 


CN 


■^       CN 


rO 


ro 


ro 


c6 


^^    ^^^  dao   NV3kN       dFN31   NV3M       XouanbôJj 

JJONnd 


<  o 


Q. 
O 


> 


o  7  E 


et: 


O 


Q_ 


CN 


UJ 

en 

Û_ 


Z5 


Figure  8 


./. 


CN 


rsj 


jjONny 


■5^ 

CL 

Ld 

o 

Z 

O 

< 

Ld 

— 

^ 

m 

r^ 

^ 

Û. 

o 

K) 


ct: 


^  E 


rO 


LJ     (N 


LJ 


^    I— 


dao  NV3kN       d^3l  NV31N     Aouanbejj