Skip to main content

Full text of "In memoriam, James McNeill Whistler"

See other formats


IN  MEMORIAM. 


JAMES  McNeill  whistler. 


LONDON,     ■ 

February  20ih,  /go 5 


^  '2t. 


IN  MEMORIAM. 


JAMES  McNeill  whistler. 


LONDON, 

February  20th,  igo^. 


Tht  rights  of  Translation  and 
Reproduction  are  reserved. 


A  SPEECH  DELIVERED  BY 

PROFESSOR   WALTER  RALEIGH 

AT  THE  CAFE  ROYAL,  LONDON,  AT 
THE  BANQUET  ON  THE  OCCASION 
OF  THE  OPENING  OF  THE  WHISTLER 
MEMORIAL  EXHIBITION. 


February  20tk,  igoj. 


PUBLISHED  BY  WILLIAM  HEINEMANN 
FOR  THE  INTERNATIONAL  SOCIETY  OF 
SCULPTORS,  PAINTERS,  AND  GRAVERS, 
AT  THE  NEW  GALLERY,  AND  PRINTED 
AT  THE   BALLANTYNE  PRESS,  LONDON. 


Mr.  President,  my  Lords,  and  Gentlemen, — 

We  are  met  to  celebrate  the  memory  of  a 
very  great  man,  and  to  do  honour  to  the  work  in 
which  he  has  perpetuated  that  memory.  Mr.  Whistler 
was  a  man  good  at  many  things ;  he  was  a  wit,  and  a 
warrior,  and  the  most  versatile  of  craftsmen.  But 
he  was  more  than  this ;  and  it  is  as  a  creator  and 
servant  of  beauty  that  he  claims  our  remembrance 
to-night.  Beauty,  and  beauty  only,  he  said,  was  the 
justification  and  aim  and  end  of  a  work  of  art.  Surely, 
in  the  history  of  the  world,  there  has  seldom  been  such 
a  collection  of  the  works  of  one  man  which  was  per- 
vaded and  inspired  and  possessed  by  the  desire  of 
beauty  as  the  wonderful  collection  now  to  be  exhibited 
in  the  New  Gallery  is  pervaded  and  inspired  and 
possessed.  Every  touch  and  every  line  in  those 
canvases  and  prints  bears  its  part  in  the  unceasing 
quest  and  shares  in  the  triumph  of  the  capture.  The 
labour  is  over ;  and  we  are  permitted  to  take  our 
pleasure,  every  man  according  to  his  capacity,  in  the 
rich  reward. 


You  will  not  expect  me,  I  am  sure,  in  the  face  ot 
these  pictures,  to  discuss  or  expound  any  theories  of 
art.  The  practice  is  better.  Not  the  most  brilliant 
of  his  theoretic  utterances  could  express  Mr.  Whistler 
a  hundredth  part  so  adequately  as  these  works  of  his. 
Indeed,  his  own  theories,  though  they  are  neat  and 
pointed  and  polished,  edged  with  wit,  and  often 
animated  by  a  profound  knowledge,  seem  to  me  to 
fall  far  short  of  expressing  him.  He  taught  his  age 
to  look  at  a  picture,  not  through  it ;  and  the  lesson 
was  a  needed  one.  But  in  his  zeal  to  reprove  the 
public  for  their  preoccupation  with  incident  and 
morality,  he  was  apt  to  deny  to  his  pictures  qualities 
which,  after  all,  they  have.  Call  a  picture  what  you 
will,  a  pattern,  or  a  symphony,  or  an  arrangement,  or 
(if  you  like)  call  it  merely  a  picture,  still  this  is  true  of 
it :  that  when  an  artist  has  done  his  best  at  symphony, 
or  arrangement,  there  comes  to  him  sometimes  an 
unsought  increment  on  his  effort ;  something  that  he 
did  not  consciously  work  for,  perhaps  does  not  even 
know  that  he  has  attained.  In  Mr.  Whistler's  figure- 
pieces  there  is  often  a  tenderness  and  grace  and  pathos 
of  human  emotion  which  is  unaccounted  for  by  the 
theory,  but  which  is  his  no  less  than  the  more  purely 
optical  qualities  that  he  laid  stress  on.  The  intensity 
of  his  purpose  overshoots  itself  and  reveals  to  him 
more  than  he  is  seeking. 


He  stood  aloof — more  completely  aloof,  perhaps, 
than  most  other  great  artists  have  done — from  the 
movements  and  schools  of  his  own  time.  His  early 
work  belongs  to  a  notable  time  of  artistic  ferment. 
The  Pre-Raphaelites  were  teaching  what  I  may  call 
their  new  morality  of  vision ;  the  Impressionists  were 
working  out  their  new  psychology  of  vision.  He 
belonged  to  neither  school.  He  picked  up  hints  and 
suggestions,  no  doubt,  from  these  and  a  hundred 
other  sources,  but  in  the  main  he  was  independent 
and  original — in  the  right  sense  of  that  word.  That 
is  to  say,  he  began  at  the  beginning ;  in  each  of  his 
works  he  creates  afresh,  as  it  were ;  he  accepts  every 
subject  as  presenting  a  new  problem  to  be  grappled 
with,  a  new  set  of  conditions  to  be  studied  and  sub- 
dued, by  new  devices,  to  the  service  of  beauty.  I  am 
not  decrying  the  utility  of  "schools"  if  I  say  that  the 
most  robust  and  splendid  of  them  may  interfere,  by 
the  very  greatness  of  their  traditions,  with  that  inces- 
sant watchfulness,  that  alert  vitality,  and  that  readiness 
for  new  experiment  which  is  found  in  all  Mr.  Whistler's 
work.  It  is  the  misfortune  of  the  schools  that  they 
give  a  false  importance  to  acquisitive  and  imitative 
talent.  And  there  is  one  school,  at  least,  which  is 
apt  to  cramp  the  work  even  of  a  man  of  genius — the 
school  of  his  own  past  successes.  If  the  love  of  ease 
entices  him,  his  very  triumphs  become  his  enemies, 


lO 

by  tempting  him  into  formula  and  repetition.  But  to 
the  end  of  his  Ufe,  Mr.  Whistler  never  rested  upon 
success ;  he  went  on  seeking  for  new  worlds  to 
conquer.  "  If  you  want  to  rest,"  he  once  said  to  a 
friend  who  complained  that  there  was  no  easy-chair 
in  his  house — "  if  you  want  to  rest  you  had  better  go 
to  bed" — and  the  remark  might  be  taken  as  the  motto 
of  his  artistic  career;  as  the  motto,  indeed,  of  the 
career  of  any  artist. 


An  alertness  like  this  finds  its  ample  reward.  It 
keeps  a  man's  intelligence  and  sympathies  open  for 
new  lessons  from  Art  and  Nature.  It  was  by  his 
sleepless  activity  of  mind  that  Mr.  Whistler  was 
enabled  to  become  the  interpreter,  and  the  pioneer 
in  Europe,  of  the  art  of  the  Japanese.  In  this,  I 
believe,  he  was  something  of  a  discoverer,  and  brought 
from  the  East,  not  gold  nor  spices,  but  a  new  charm. 
He  may  be  said  to  have  inaugurated,  in  the  happiest 
way,  the  Anglo-Japanese  Alliance — an  Alliance  which, 
in  the  realm  of  Art,  is  neither  offensive  nor  defensive, 
but  devoted  to  mutual  appreciation  and  mutual 
delight — a  kind  of  friendly  tournament  on  the  Field 
of  the  Cloth  of  Gold.  And,  besides  Japan,  there  was 
another  great  teacher  from  whom  he  never  ceased  to 
learn — the  Goddess  Nature,  whom  he  was  wont  to 
patronise  with  a  certain  humorous  bravado.  She  had 
so  much  he  did  not  want,  that  he  was  inclined  to 
regard  her  as  a  busybody,  an  officious  and  too  im- 
portunate saleswoman,  pressing  her  garish  stores  of 
goods  on  his  attention.  Yet  how  much  did  he  not 
learn  from  his  sensitive  and  untiring  observation  of 
Nature  ?  When  did  he  cease  to  study  her  moving 
benediction  of  light  ?  The  public  of  his  time  asked 
a  painter  for  recognisable  and  clearly  defined  pictorial 
symbols  of  common  objects.  But  these  objects,  to  an 
eye  not  blinded  by  habit,  exist  in  a  strange  submarine 


world,  a  shifting  and  glimmering  sea  of  light  and  air. 
It  was  this  sea  that  Mr.  Whistler  cared  for — this  sea 
in  its  gentlest  undulating  moods;  and,  although  I 
dare  not  judge  others  by  my  own  case,  yet  I  believe 
there  are  many  artists  who  were  taught  by  his  work, 
as  I,  in  my  layman's  ignorance,  was  taught,  to  take  a 
keener  pleasure  in  observing  how  light  caresses  the 
surfaces  of  things,  and  how  air  softens  their  outlines. 


13 


But  the  highest  praise  remains  to  tell.  Wherever 
artists  are  gathered  together,  Mr.  Whistler  cannot  be 
too  much  honoured  for  what  has  been  well  called 
his  "  implacable  conscience."  He  found  no  use  on 
this  earth  for  critics.  But  there  never  lived  a  severer 
critic  of  himself.  Among  all  the  temptations  that 
assail  an  artist  he  walked  so  absolutely  unspotted  and 
unsubdued,  with  so  confident  a  gaiety,  that  it  seems 
unfair  to  say  that  he  resisted  temptation  ;  it  is  almost 
as  if  he  had  never  been  tempted.  He  would  destroy 
any  of  his  works  rather  than  leave  a  careless  or  inex- 
pressive touch  within  the  limits  of  the  frame.  He 
would  begin  again  a  hundred  times  over,  rather  than 
attempt,  by  patching,  to  make  his  work  seem  better 
than  it  was.  He  was  not  content  till  he  had  got  what 
he  wanted,  and  his  work  expressed  himself  at  his  best. 
And  this  was  the  cause,  I  think,  of  his  remarkably 
strong  sense  of  property  in  his  pictures.  They  were 
his  children,  a  part  of  himself,  and  that  they  should 
be  sold  into  slavery,  that  anything  so  accidental  and 
external  as  the  payment  of  money  should  alienate  or 
impair  his  rights  in  them,  always  seemed  to  him,  I 
think,  a  mere  piece  of  inhumanity  and  impertinence 
on  the  part  ofthe  law. 


14 


Consider  the  irony  of  things.  Here  was  one  of  the 
most  serious-minded  men  that  have  ever  Uved  in  this 
world.  For  a  long  time  he  was  widely  and  authori- 
tatively regarded  as  a  trifler  and  a  jester,  one  who 
evaded  difficulties  and  sought  a  cheap  reputation  for 
eccentricity.  I  will  not  remind  you  of  any  incidents 
in  the  famous  trial,  though  it  still  has  its  lessons  for 
artists  and  critics.  Any  one  who  takes  up  the  full 
report  of  that  trial  and  reads  it  now,  will  rub  his  eyes 
and  wonder.  It  tells  how  the  official  worlds  of  Art 
and  Criticism  were  ranged  against  Mr.  Whistler  and  a 
few  friends.  Many  of  the  witnesses  no  doubt  re- 
pented later  of  their  evidence — of  being  so  busy  with 
their  tongues  and  so  idle  with  their  eyes.  But  no 
man  goes  through  an  experience  of  this  kind  un- 
touched. Mr.  Whistler  went  on  with  his  work — that 
is  the  great  thing — and  provided  himself  with  a  de- 
fence against  the  world.  Laughter,  which  is  often 
used  for  defensive  purposes  by  those  who  have  good 
wits  and  sensitive  tempers,  became  his  shield  and 
his  spear.  His  attitude  to  the  public  was  exactly  the 
attitude  taken  up  by  Robert  Browning,  who  suffered 
as  long  a  period  of  neglect  and  mistake,  in  those  lines 
of  The  Ring  and  the  Book  : 

"  Well,  British  Public,  ye  who  like  me  not, 
(God  love  you  !)  and  will  have  your  proper  laugh 
At  the  dark  question  : — laugh  it  !     I  laugh  first." 


15 

Mr.  Whistler  always  laughed  first.  So  he  carried 
the  war  into  the  enemy's  country.  They  treated  the 
business  which  was  no  less  than  a  religion  to  him  as 
if  it  were  a  pretence  and  a  trifle.  What  wonder  if  he 
treated  in  the  same  spirit  the  business  which  was 
most  serious  to  them  ?  Politics,  society,  banking — 
these  also  are  serious  affairs.  But  one  who  comes 
across  them  in  his  moments  of  relaxation,  after  a  long 
and  grim  struggle  with  one  of  the  most  difficult  crafts 
in  the  world,  may  be  excused  if  he  finds  in  them 
plentiful  opportunities  for  amusement.  After  all,  an 
artist  must  be  amused — it  is  the  breath  of  his  nostrils  ; 
he  must  find  delight  or  make  it,  whether  from  under- 
standing things,  or  from  indulging  his  humour  in 
wilfully  misunderstanding  them.  Where  Mr.  Whistler 
found  delight  in  misunderstanding,  he  also  gave  delight 
by  his  child-like  glee  and  by  his  powers  of  wit — 
a  wit  not  employed  in  great  campaigns,  but  decorated 
and  tempered  and  worn  by  the  side,  or  flourished  in 
the  hand,  as  a  fit  addition  to  courtly  dress. 


It) 


He  gained  recognition  at  last.  Wherever  a  man  oi 
genius  spends  an  arduous  life  in  the  lonely  pursuit  of 
his  aims,  you  find  the  same  sequel,  in  posthumous  sub- 
scriptions, or  on  graven  memorial  stones,  or  in  those 
honorary  degrees  which  are  conferred  by  Universities 
on  famous  veterans.  I  am  glad  to  think  that  the 
honorary  degree  which  was  conferred  on  Mr.  Whistler 
some  two  years  ago  by  the  University  of  Glasgow 
gave  him  sincere  pleasure.  I  know  it  was  felt  by 
those  whose  votes  conferred  it,  that  if  a  living  painter 
was  to  be  chosen  from  among  the  English-speaking 
peoples  for  academic  honours,  there  could  be  no 
question  what  name  to  choose.  I  think  the  precedent 
was  a  good  one  ;  and  I  trust  it  will  be  followed  up. 
If  a  University  is  to  represent  all  that  is  best  in  the 
intelligence  and  skill  of  a  nation,  it  can  ill  afford  to 
neglect  the  Fine  Arts.  Let  the  great  artist  take 
refuge  in  isolation  if  he  will,  but  do  not  force  it  upon 
him.  For,  indeed,  his  work,  though  he  refuses  to 
submit  it  to  the  popular  suffrage,  or  to  modify  it  by 
the  opinions  of  critics,  is  an  asset  of  civilisation,  a 
possession  for  ever ;  and  his  example  is  a  model  for 
all  workers  in  its  unflagging  persistence  and  in  its 
devotion  to  some  of  the  greatest  and  best  things  that 
are  attainable  by  the  frailty  of  our  human  nature. 

Gentlemen,  I  give  you  the  toast  of 

•'The  Memory  of  Whistler." 


CATALOGUE 


OF     THE     BULK     OF 


The  Library  of  the  late 

SIR  WALTER  RALEIGH,  M. A 

Professor  of  Eng-lish   Literature,   Oxford, 

1904-1922. 


On    Sale    by 


B.  H.  BLACKWELL,  LTD. 

50    &    51     BROAD    STREET 

OXFORD 


\o.    187 


November,    1922 


Sir    Walter   Raleigh,   late    Professor   of 

English  Literature  in  Oxford 

University.