av-**'-^i— i-;-^
-r»i
^ fS
/^' / '
ii
:h^; ;•■:.. ::^*^
,f.:
^>'0^\ ^-^^
<.»■-' ¥^
7
f' .
1^
I/// .
':p;cy?.
."ift' ■
/%• '
(/^<
J'
/
/
■*■ , J'
i. <- - I
6 v/^-/
/ / /
z^
i^ rX
^. 1.^ . / O
*
•5#"^^
<jt i\!it %\i.uh%kn ^
%«
PRINCETON, N. J.
**.
^^«
Presented by' W<S\I . cA . ONV% V^Nd <S O X
Division
Sectio)/
7 /
ifL.Xi
/-
fr
/THE ^3MBk^ '^Y''1?^
INSTITVTION OF
CHRISTIAN RELIGION,
WRITTEN IN LATINE BY M. lOHN
'CALVINP5 AND TRANSLATED INTO E N-
glilTi according to the authors laft editioiijby
THOMAS NORTON.
HerfttKtd are r^rly added fundry Tables tofinde theprift-*
cipall matter:; entreated of in this boohe , containing by
order of commonplaces the ffi'/nme of the whole doBrine
taught in the fame ^ and alfo the declaration of places
of Scriprure therein expounded.
Imprinted at London by Thomas Vautrollicr
for VVilliam Norton.
I 5 Z 8.
:Sv- *
d • - ♦
T, N. THE TRANSLA-
TOR TO THE READER.
Ood Header, here is now ojfredyou the fourth timefr'm-
Hedm Engl/Jhey M. Caluines bool^e of the Injihution of
\ Chriftiizn HelJgfon^a bool^e of^eat Uboter to the author,
I and of ^ eat profit to the Church of God.M.Calumefirji
wrote it whe he was ayong man,a boof{e of fmall volumei
(^^^ and Jince thatfeafon he hath at fupdry times publijhed
'^ with nevf encrcafesyfiU protejiingat euery edition himfelfe to be one of
*^ofc qui fcnbendo proficiunc, & proficiedo (cx\h\ini^which With their
Writing do grow in profiting, and with their profiting doprocede in writing,
jit length haiiinge in many his other workes trauailcd about expofit-ion of
fundry books of the Scnptures,^ in the fame finding occafion to difcourfg
offundry commonplaces andmatters of doctrine^ which being handled ac"
cording to the occafios of the text that were ofired him <^ not in any other
methode^were notfo ready for thereadenyfejye therefore entredinto this
purpofe^to enlarge this booke of Infiitutions ^ therein to treate ofallthofe
titles and commonplaces largely twith this ententythat whenfoeuer any oc-
cafiofellin his other book^sto treate ofanyfuch caufe^he would not newly
atnpUfie his booJ^es of Co^nmcntaries and expo fitions therewith^ butreferre
his reader wholly to this florehoufe andtreafure of that fort ofdiuine lear-
ning. As age and weakencffe grew vpon himyfo he haflenedhis labour, and
according to his petition to Gody he in maner ended his life with his worl^e,
for he liued not long after.So great a iewell was meete to be made mofi be"
ncficiall, that is to fay, applied to mofi common vfe. Therefore in the very
beginning of the S^cenes Maiefiiesmofl bleffedreigne,! tranfiated it out
oflatincinto EngUfheyfor the commoditie of the church ofChrifi, at the
fpeciallrequefi of my derefrendes of worthy memory Reginald Vf^olfe eJr
Edward VVhitcht^th y the one her Maiefiiex Vr inter for the Hebrew e^
Greh^y^ Latine tongSythe other her Highnei Vrinter of the bookies of co-
mon Vrayer. I performed my worJ^ in the houfe of my fay dfr ends Edward
yf^hitchurch,a man well k^owen of 'Upright hart and dealin^,an atmcient
•:^elot*s Gaselier , as plaine and true afrcnd as euer I k^ew liuingyand as
dcfirom to do any thinge to common good,j^eciaUy by the aduauncement of
The Preface
irne rel/gion.^t mj^'fdtdfirji editio of this booI^Cyl cofidered how the author
thereof had of long time pifrfofely labored to write the fame mcfl exaEily^
and to fackc great plenty of matter infmall roome of wordcs/yea and tho/e
fo circumjj>e£fly andfrecifelv ordered^to attoide the cdinUations offuchyOS
for enmity to the triteth therein contained , vcoulde gladly feekc andabufe
'all adtiantages which might be found bv any ouerfight in penning ofitjthat
the fentences were thereby become fo full as nothinge might well be added
.vithoiit idle fuperftuity^cjjj* again'efo niely fared that nothing could be mi-
niOjed without taking away fame nee effaryfub fiance of matter therein ex-
prejfed.Thls mancr ofwritingejbefide the peculiar tearmes of art ex andfi-
gures^and the dijficulty of the mdtten themfelucs^bcing throughout enter-
laced with the fchoolemcns controuerfies, made a great hardnes in the aU'
thors own book^^in that tong wherin otherwife he is both plentiful <^ eafie,
infomuch that itfufEfsth not to read him once , vnleffeyoucan be content
to read in 'vaine. This confideration cncombredme with ^eat doutfulneffe
for the whole order <^ frame of my tranfiation.lf I fhould follow the words^
rfaw that ofnecefjtty the hardncjfe in the tranflation mufi nedes be grea*
ter than was in the tonge wherin it was originally wrytten. if I fhould Icaue
the courfe ofwordesyandgraunt myfelfe liberty after the naiterall maner of
my owne tonge,tofaj' that in Englifh which I conceaucd to be his meaning
in LatinCy I plainelypcrceiucd how hardly I might efcape en' our t(^ on the
ether fide in this matter of faith andreligion^ howe pcrillous it was to erre.
For I durfi not pre fume to warrant my felfe to haue his meaninge without
his wordes . jindthey that wote what it is to tranflate well and faithfully,
fjje'ially in matters o f religion ^do J^ow that not the only grammaticall con-
firucfion of words fufffeth , but the very buildinge and order toobferue aU
advantages of vehemence or grace, by placing or accent of wordesyTnal^eth
much to the trtte fetttng forth cfa wryters minde. In the cnde, Irefiedv-
pon this determination , to followe the wordes fo neere as the phrafe of the
£'r;gli(he tonge would fuffcr me. V^hich purpofe I fo perform edyt hat if the
lEnglifloe bookie were printed in fuch paper and letter as the Latine is , it
fijonld not exceede the Latine in<jua^rity.p'f^herebyybejide all other com'
moditics that a faith full tranfation of fo good a work^c may bringy this one
benefit is moreouer prouidi d for fuch as are defirous to attaine fome know-
ledge of the Latine tongue (which is at thtstimetobc wifhedin many of
thofe men for whofe profeffim thk bock^e mofi fitly ferueth ) that they fioall
notfinde any more Et7gli(h than (halJ fujfice to confine the Latine withaty
except in fuch fewe places, where the great difference ofthephrafes of the
langttages enforced me:fo that comparing the one with the other,they /hall
both profit m good mattery and furnifhc themfelues with -vnder Banding of
thatj^eachiwherin the grc^tefi trcafures of knowledge are difclofed.Intht
di/ing^
The Preface
doing hereof^ I did not only trufi mine orvne mi or ability ^ but examined rny
whole doinge from femence to fcntence throughout the whole book,e rvith
conference <^ ouerlooking of fmh learned men^as my tranflation being al-
lowed by their iudgement , 1 did both fatisfe mine owne confcience that I
had done truly,(2^ their apj^rouing of it might be a good warrant to the rea^
dcrythat nothing fhould herein be deliuered him but found vnmingUd and
'vncomtpted doShrintCue in fuchfort as the author hiinfelfhadfirfl ficmed
it. All that 1 wrote t the graue ^learned q^ vertuotis maM^Daitid yi'^hite-
hed(whom I name with honorable remembrace )did among oiherjcomp^-e
nith the Latine ^examining cuery f entente throughout the whole booke.Bc'
fide all this,I,priuately required many yd^ generally all men with whom I e-
9ter had any talke of this matter, that if they found any thing either not rru-
ly tranf^atedyOr not plainly EngliPjed,they would enforme me thereof pro-
mifinge either to fatisfe them or to amende it. Since which time I haue not
kin aduertifed by any man of any thing which they would require to be al-
tered. ISfeither had I myfelfe, by reafon ofmyprofe/Jion beinge othcrw.fc
occupiedyany leafure toperufe it. And that Is the c(iufe,why not only at the
fecond ^ third time but aljo at this imprefjion^you haue no change at all in
the work^ybut altpgether as it was before. In dede Iperceiitcd many me wel
minded ^fiudious of this bocl{Cf to require a table for their eafe and fur-
therance. Their honeji defire I haue fulfilled in the fecond edition, <^ haue
added thereto a plentifull table , which is alfo here inferted which I haue
tranflated out of the Latine,wherin the prim ipali matters difconrfed in this
book^ are named by therr due titles in order of Alphabet, and rnder euery
title is fet forth a briefe fumme of the whole doBrine taught in this bool^y
concerning the matter belonging to that title or comon place: and therwith
is added the Bool^y Chapt errand SeEfion or ditujton of the Chapter ^where
the fame doEirine vs more largely expreffed andproued. And for the redier
finding thereof I hdue caufed the number of Chapters to be fet vpon eucry
leafe in the booke^ and quoted the SeSHonsalfo by their due numbers with
the vfuall figures of Algorifme. And none at this lafi puhlijhinge , my
friendcs by whofe charge it is nowe newcly imprinted in a Komainc letter
and fmaller volume , with diuerfe other Tables , which fince my fecond
edition were gathered by M. Marlorate , to be tranflatfdandherc added
for your benefice . Moreouer , where a^s in the fir ft edition the euill mamr
ofrnyfcriblinge har.de , the enterlininge of my Copy, andfomf other atufcs
nellknowen amongeworhemcn if that fa<.7ilty , made "very manyfaultesto
pajfe the Trintcr , I haue in the fccontt imprefjion caiifedthe b-.o^c to be
compcfed by the printed copy, and co)rcBcd by the written:whercby it miifi
needcs be that it was much more truely done than the other w.ti , a-slmy
fplfe 4o f^nawe aboue three hundred fault cs amended. And now at this laj^
* ;|
The Preface
Trintmgetthe compojtnge after a printed copy hnngeth fame eafe^dtidtht
diligence vfed about the correSiionyhauing bin right faithfully looked yn~
tOyit can not be but much more truely fet forth. This alfo is performed ythat
the yolume being fmalhr,mth a letter fayre and legible^it is of more eafie
price^that it may be of more common vfe^andfo to more large communica-'
tinge of fo ^eat a treafure io thofe that deflre Chriflian knowledge for in*
fhuSfio of their faith y(^ guiding of their dueties.Thiu on the printers be"
halfe and mine ^your eafe and commodity (good readers) is prouidedfor.
JSoxp rejiethyour ownc diligence for yot4T own profit in fiudying it.Tojpend
many words in comending the worl^e it felfcyVpere nedelejfe:yct thus much
1 thinli^ I may both not vntruely and not yainelyfay , that though many
^eat learned men hane written bookies of commonplaces of our religion^Ai
MeUnchton^Sarceritis^and other^ whofe worf^es are very good and profita-
hie to the Church ofGod.yct by the confenting iudgemet of thofe that rn-
derjiande the fame , there is none to be compared to this rvorl^e of Caluine,
both for his fnbjiantiaUfujficience of do Shine , the founde declaration of
trueth in articles of our religiony the large and learned confirmation of the
famCyand the mojl dcepe andfironge confutation of all olde and new here-
fies.fo that(the holy Scriptures exceptedjthis ts one of the mofl profitable
bookes for all ftudents of Chriflian diuinity, yVherein^ goodrcaders ) as 1
am glad for the glory of God y andforyour benefit , that you may haue this
profit of my trauelI,fo I befechyou let me haue this'vfe ofyourgentleneffey
that my doings may be confimidtofuchgoodendaslhaue meant them:<^
that if any thinge mifiike you by reafon ofhardnesyor any other canfe that
mayfceme to be my default ^you mil not forthwith condcmne the workcjbtit
readitoftcr:in which doingyou fhallfinde (as many haue confiffed to me
that they haue found by experience) that thofe thinges which at the fir fi
rcadingc fha^l di/pleafeyouforhardnesyJhalJ be founde fo eafie Asfo hard
matter would fuffcr.c^" fur the mofl part mere eafie thanfome other phrafe
which (hould with greater loo fenes ^ fmoother fiiding away dcceiue yottf
'vnderflandinge. / confeffc in dede it is not finely ZT plcafantly written,nur
carieth with itfurh d elite full grace of fpeech a,sfome great wife men haue
beflowed vpon fome foolifhrr things,yet it containeth found truth fet forth
with faithfutl plainnes without wrong done to the authors meaninge:andfo
if you accept ■fjj' ufe it^you fh all not fail e to haue great profit thereby ^and 2
fhallthink^ my labour very well employed.
Thomas Norton.
TO
TO THE MOST MIGHTY
AND NOBLE PRINCE,
FRANCISCE THE MOST CHRI-
STIAN KING THE FRENCH KING
his foueraigne Lorde,Iohn Caluinc
wifheth peace and falua-
tion in Chrift,
Hen I did firft fet my hand to this worfec,! thought
nothing lefle (moft noble King) than to write any
fi thing that afterwarde ihould be prcfented to your
maieftie. Onely my minde was to tcache ccicaine,
introdudions whereby they that are touxrhed with
feme zeale of religion might beinftrudedtotrue
godhneirc. And this trauaile I tookc principally for my contrcmen
the Frenchemen , of whom I vndcrftodc very many to hunger and
thirft for Chrift , but I fa wc very few that had rightly rcceiued fo
much as any litle knowledge of him. And that this was my meaning,
the bokcit felfc dcdarcth , being framed aftcrafimple andplaine
fnaner of teaching. But when I perceiued , that the furious rage of
fomc wicked men hath fo farre preuaiJed in your reaime , that in it
fherc is no roomc for founde dodrine:! thought I iliould do a thing
worth my trauaile , all in one worke both to geue an inftiudion for
ihem , and to declare a confcflion to you *. whereby ye may Jesrne
whatmancrofdoftrineyis, againft which thofc furious men bux-^ne
in fo great rage, who at this day trouble your rcalmc with fv/eafd
and ficr.For I will not feare to c6fcfle5that 1 haue in this worke com-
prehended in mancr the furame of that felfe fame dodrine , againft
vhich they eric out , that it ought to be punifhed with prifonmenc,
banifhcmcnt, condemnation without iudgcmcni,and with fiefjthat
it ou iht to be chaccd away by lande and fca, I knowe in decde with
howe hainous informations they hauc filled yourmindc and eares,
to make our caufe moft hatefuil vnto youtbut this of your clem.encie
©ughryou to vvcy,that there {balbc noinnoccnce,neither in wordc$
* iiij
The Preface
nor dccdcSjif it may be enough to accufc.Truely if any, to bring the
fame in hatred, fhail allege that this Do^rinc whereof I nowcgo
about to yelde accompt vnio yoUjhath bene long ago condemned by
confenie of all degrees , and acteintcd by many ludgcmcnts already
geuen in ludiciall couries : all that he faith fhnll amount tp no more,
but that it harh partly bin violently throwen downe by the bandin^c
and power of the aducrlarics thereof, and partly bcncirauorovUy
and fraudulently opprell'cd with their lies and luttl^ pra«5tiics and
fclaunders. Herein ie violence (hewed, thit without hearing the caufc
bloody fcnicnccs are pronounced againft it : here in i^ fraude , that
it is wirhouc dcferuing accufed of fedition and eucll doing. And that
none may thinke :hat wc wrongfully complaine of thrfe things, you
^our fclfe can beare vs witncfle , moft ncblc kinf: , with howc licn;^
fclaunders ic is dayely accufed vnto you : a>s,th:u it icdcth to no other
ende but to writh from kings their keptei s out of their handcs , to
throwCjdowne all ludges fcatcs and ludgement.i , to fubuertc all or-
ders and ciuilc gouerncmcnts, to trouble the ycacc and quicte ofthc
people , to abolilh .ill lawcs , to vndo all proprieties and polleffions,
6nally to turne all things vp(ide downe. And ytt you heare y fmallcft
portion.Fcr horrible things they fprende abroade among rhc people:
^vhichif they were true, the whole world might worthily ludgcic
Yiiih the mainteincrs thereof, worthy of a thoufandc fiers and ^al-
lowcs. Whocan nowc marutU that a common Iiatrcd ts kindled a-
gainft itjwherc fuch mofl wrongfull acculations are bcleued.Lo, this
IS the caufe that all degrees agree and confpire to the condemning
of vs &ourdo(firine. They that lit to iudgc, being rauilhcd withth.is
affedio pronounce for fentences their forcconctiucd dctcrminr.tigs
^hich they brought from home with them : .^nd thinke that they
hauc well enough difcharged their dunes if ihey ccxr.maundc np
man to be diawcntociecution.butfuch as arc founde giky cither
by thtir ownc confcflion or by fufhcient witmHe.liiit of what fjult?
of that condemned dodrine,fay they. Bui by wiut la, ye condemned?
Herein (hould hauc ftandc the fuccor ok dcfcnfc loi ihcm,not to
dcnie the dodrine it felfe, but to mainicine it for true. But here is all
Lbcrric onts to mutter vtterly cut of f»om vs.
Wherefore I do not vnnillly require, moft vidorious Kin^ , that it
tnay pleafc you to take into your owne hande the whole hearing, of
tlic caufe which hechcrto hath bene tioublcfomly handled or rather
carelcHy toffcd without all order of lawe,more by outragicu* iicate
than ludiciall grauitie. Neither yet thinke , that I here go about to
make muic owne uniuic dcfcnfe, whereby 1 may procure to mv felfp
'a fafc
To the French King.
arfafc returnc inco my natjue c6crec,£o which although I bcare fuch
affcdion of naciiraJl louc as bccooicth mc : yet as the cafe nowe is,
I not mifcotentcdiy wanCit.But I take vppon mc the common caufc
of all the godly,yca and the caufc ol' Chrift himlclfjwhich at thi> day
hauing bene by all meancs torne & trodcn downe in your kjngdome,
licth as it were in dcfpcircd cafe , and that in dccde rather by the ty-
ranny of certaine PharifecSjthan by your owne knowledgc.But howe
that c<?mcth to palTc, it is not here needefull to ttll : trucly it Jieth
in great dilk^Ile.For thus farre haue the vngodly prcuailed^that the
truethofChritt,if it be notdeftroyed being chaced away and fcat-
tcrcd abrode,yet it licth hidden as buried and vnregardcd : as for the
filly poore Charch,it is either wafted with cruell (laughters , and fo
driuen away with banifhmcnts or difmaycd with threatens and ter-
i;ors that it dare not ones open her mouth. And yet ftill they cotinuc
vyith fiich rage and fercencflc as they arc wont , thru{ting ftrongly
againil the wall alieady bending & the mine which themrtluef^ hauc
made. In the mcanc time no man fteppcrh fourth , to fethimfclfe in
defenic againft fuch furies . And they , if there be any fuch , thac
will moft of all feeme to fauor the truthjfay no more but that it were
good to pardon the error and vnTkilfuInefifc of ignorantemen. For
thus the good natured men forfooth do fpcakccalling that error and
vnfkilfulncGb which they knowc to be the moft certaine truetli of
God; calling them ignorante men , whocs witt they fee rhat Chrift
liath not fo defpifcd but that he hadi vouchefaucd to communicate
to them the mifterics of his heauenly wifedome. So much are all
afliamcdoftheGorpell. It flialbe your office (moft noble King)noc
to turn^ away your earcs nor your mindc from fo iuft a dcfcnfc ; fpc-
cially when fo great a matter is in queftion : namely howe the gloric
of God may be mainteined fife in earth , howe the trueth of God
may kepc her hpnorJioweChrifimay haue hiskingdome picferued
whole among vs. This is a matter worthy for your eares,worthy for
your iudgemet,woithy for your royall throne.For,euen this thought
maketh a true king:ro acknowlcdec himCc^fm the gouernancc pf his
kmgdomcto be the miniftcrof God, Neitl.er doth henowevfca
iingdome but a robberie , which rcigneth not to this cnde that he
may feruc theglone of God. And he is dcirciucd that loketh for a log
profperitie of char kin;^lome ♦ wh;ch is npt ruled by the fccptcr of
God, that isjliy bis holy v/ord;for3(rnuch as the hcaucnly Oracle can
not prouc vainc,whcTtby it is pioc!n!rned,tnat the people fhslbe fcat-
tered abrode where prophecic failcth. Neither ought the contempt Prouer.
of our bafcucfle to witiidrawc you fro this purpofc. Wc Fcnly knowc zsf.^ S.
The Preface
right well , howc poorc and abicd (illy men wc be , namely in the
C^htof God miferablcfinncrs ,in the fight of men moftdefpiled
pcrfoncs,yea and (if you will) ccrtatnc excrements and outcsftes of
the woi Id , or whaifocuer Tiler ihmg may be named : fo that there
rcmameth nothing lor vs to gloric vpon before God , but his onely
mcrcie whci cby we are witi:out any our dcfcruing rcceiued mto the
hope of-etcrna!l faluacion : and before mcn,nothing but our weake-
nellcjwhich amo^ them it is taken for a moft great fhamc to cotclTe
fo much as in countenace.But our dodrinc muft be auaced hy abouc
all gloric of the world, mad ftande vnuanquifhable aboue all power:
_ bccaufe it is not oures , but the dodrine ot the liuing God and of hn
-, 'Chriftjwhom the Father hath appointed king to bearc rule euen
t/a II. fiomfca tofeajandfrom theriucrseucntothe endes of the earth:
4- and fo to beare rulc,that ftrikmg the whole earth with the only rod
Pia.2.i» of h,s moutlijhe may breake it with all the iron and brafen ftrength,
with all the golden and fiiucr gliftering thereof, as it were potters
veflllls : as the Prophets prophccie of the royaltic of his kingdomc.
Our aduerfarics in dcede do crie out to the contrary, and fay that wc
failly pretcnde the word of God, whereof we be moft wicked cor-
ruptets. But how this is not onely a malicious Iclaunder , but alio a
notable {hamcIcfrncfTejyou yourfelfe by reading our confclVion,
may according to your wifedomeiudgc. Yet here it is alfo good to
fay fomwhat , either to moue you to willingneirc and heedefulneflc,
Pom.ia or at the leaft to prepare you a way to the readmg of it.Paulc, when
*• he willed allprophecie tobc framed to the agreablenefl'c of faith,
hath fct a moft fure rule whereby the expoudmg of Scripture ought
to be tried . Nowe if our dodrine be examined by this rule of faith,
the vidorie is already in our handcs. For, what doth better or more
fitly agree with faith , than to acknowledge our felues naked of all
vcrtue jthatof God wc may be clothed .''empty of all good, that of
him we may be filled ? the bonde feruantes of linne , that of him wc
may be made frc ? blindc,that of him we may be enlightened? lame,
that of ! '.m wemiy be madcftrcifht? feble ,that of him we may be
vpholdc^ to take from our fclucs all maitcr of fj;loricng,thai he alone
may be t:lo: icus on hv,andin him we may olorie?Whcn we fay thefc
and fuch like ihin[;s, they interrupt ys & cry out , that by this meanc
isoueithroweni wote not what blind light of nature, fained prepa-
rations, freewill, workes meritorious of eternall faluation, together
with their fupererogatiosibccaufc they can not abide iliat the whole
praife Si glorie of all goodncfie,vertue,rightecufncfle,and wifdome
Icrc a ^^^ou\d rem ainc in God.But wc rcadc not that ihcjr were blamed t ha^
hawo
i*J.
To the French King.
haue drawcn to much out of the f ountainc of liuing water : on the
contrary (ide they arc fharply rebuked which hauc digged to them-
felues pittes , broken pitccs i which are not able to holde water.
Againe what is more agreablc with faith , than to promifc to them-
felues chat God will be co them a fauorable Father , where Chrift is
acknowledged to be a brother and procurer of fauor? than afluredly
to loke for al things ioiful & profperous at his hadjwhofe vnfpckablc Rom.S.
louc toward vs hath proccded fo farrc , that he hath not fpared his 3 2.
oncly begotten fonne , but that he gaue him for vs ? than to reft in
fure loking for faluation & etcrnall life, where we triinke vpon Chnft
geuen of the Father,in whom fuch trcafures are hidden? Here they
fteppe in againft vs, and crie out that this certainty of affiance is not
without arrogance and prefumption. But as nothingof our felues, fo
all things ought we to prcfume of God : and v/e are for none other
reafon (polled ofvaine glory , but that wc fliould learnciogloricin
the Lorde. What is there more ? Confidcr (moft mighty Prinre) all
the partes of our canfe.and thinke that we are worfc than any kindc
of wicked men, vnlefle you plainly finde that we arc in trouble and
railed at,bycaufe we put our truft in the liuing God;becaure we beleuc
that this is the eternall life,to knowc one trewc God,3nd him whom i.Titn.
he hath fent lefus Chrift. For this hope, fome of vsarcboundein 4»o*
ironsXome arc whipped,fomc are caricd about in mockage,iome are ^^" *7»
condemned without iudgement , fome are moft cruelly tormented,
fome efcape away by flight : but all are diftreifed with troiible,aIl arc
moft terribly accuricd ,torne with fl,iundcrs , and handled in moft
hainous wife.Nowe loke vpo our aduerraries([ fpcakc of the degree
of Pricfts, atwhofc beckc and will the other cxcrcife cnmmitiesa-
gainftvs) and confider with mc a httle while, with what zeale they
be caried. As for the trewe rchgion,which is taught in the Scriptures,
and which ought to beholden certaine amongallmen, they eafiiy
geue leauc both to chemfclucs and other to be ignorant of it, to ne-
gled and defpifc it ; and they thinke that it maketh fmall matter
what euery man beleuc or not beleuc concerning God and Chrift,
fo that he do with an vnexprefTed faith (as they call it) fubmit his
mindc to the iudgcmcnt of the Church : neither are they much
moucd, if it happen that the elorie of God be defiled with mamfeft
blafphemics , fo that no man lift vp his finger agr.inft the fupiemacic
of the Apoftclike fea. and authority of our holy mother the Church.
Why therefore do they with fo great crucltie & feircencirc faght for
the MafTe , Purgatorie, Pilgremages , and (uch trifles , fo farrc forth,
that they fay that without moft cxprcifed faith (as I may fo call it) of
The preface
thcfc things, godlineflc can not Ihnde , whereas yet they proue nat
that any of rhcfc things come out of the word of God? Why fo, buc
bycaofe their belly is their God,their kitchen is their rehgion:which
being taken away, they thinke chat they fhall not onely be no Chri-
ftians , but alfo no men ?For though tome of them do plenteoufly
gluct themfdues, & other Tome hue with gnawing of poore cruftes;
yet they hue all of one pot , which without thefe warming helpes
ihould not onely wave coide , but alfo throughly freefe. Therefore
how much more euery of the is carefull for his belly, Co much more
earneft warrier he is for their fairh . Finally they all cndcuor them-
felues to this, to kepe ftill either both kmgdome fafc, and their belly
foil : but of pure zeale none of them (heweth any token , be it neueu
fo little. Neither yet fo do they ceafe to flaunder our dodrine, and
by al the colours that they can,to accufc and defame it,whereby they
may bring it mto hatred or fufpicion. They call it newe , and lately
forged : they cauill that it is doubtfullj& vncertaine : they demaunde
by what miracles it is confirmed;they af ke whether it be meete that;
it fliouid preuaile againft the confcnte of fo many holy Fathers, and
the moft auncient cuftome : they prelTe vpon ts to confes it to be
fchifmaticall, which moucth warre againft the Church, or that the
Church hath hen dead in many ages in which no fuch thing hath
bene hearde of.Laft of all they fay ,t hat there neede no arguments,
for (fay they) it may by the frutes be iudged of what forte it is , na-
mely which hath bredde fo huge a heapeof fedes,fo many turmoiles
of {"editions, fo great licentioufncfle of vices. Trewlyfulleafy itis,
for them, to triumph vp6 a forfaken caufe before the light belcuing
and ignorant multitudc.But if we might alfo haue our turnehkcwifc
allowed vs to fpeake , verily this fharpe heatc would fone be cooled
whcrewiththey do fo with full mouth and as hccmioufly as vnpu-
niihedly fome againft vs.
Firft/.vhcras they call it newcjthcy do great wrong to Godjwhofc
holy word dcferucd not to be accufcd of newnefle.To them in dede
I nothin 7, dout that it is new, to whom Chrift is newe,& his Gofpel
Fom.4. is newc. Buc they which knewe that preaching of Paule to be olde,
*J* that Icfus C hvift died for our finncs , and rofe againe for our iuftifi-
cation,fhall finde nothing newe among vs. Wheras it hath long lien
hidden vnknowcn , and buried : that is the fault of the vngodlineflTe
of men.Nowc fith it is by the bountifulnefle of God reliorcd to vs,
it ought at Icaft by right of full reftiiution to recciue againe the title
of auncientie.
Outofthcfamcfountainc of ignorance fpringcth this j that they
^k^
To the French King.
take it for doubtful! and vncertaine.This verely is it which the Lord
by his Prophet compiaineth , that the oxc fcnewe his owner, and the Era.i.j^
affe his maifters IhW , but his people knewe not him,Buthowe(bcuer
they mocke at the vnccrtaimy of ir:if they were driuen to fcalc their
owne dodrine with their owne blood,and with loffc of their iife,men
might fee howc much thy Tec by it. But farre other is our afHance»
which drcadeth neither the terrors of dcath,Ror yet the very iudgc-
ment feate of God*
Whcras they require miracles of vs,they dcalc vnreafbnably with
vs.For wc coyne no new Gofpelljbut hold faft the Iclfe fame Gofpcl
for confirming of the truth wherof al the miracles do fcruc that cucr
Cbrift & his Apoftlcs haue done. But this thing they haue fpecial a-
bouc vSjthat they can cuen to this day cofirme their faith with con-
tinuall miracles . Yea but rather they all-?age miracles , which may
Weaken a mmdc orhcrwifc well ftabliOied : they are Co either trifling
& worthy to be laughed at,or vainc & lying. And yet,alihough they
were neuer fo m6ftruouJ,they ought not to haue bin of any value a-
gainft'the word of God ; forafmuch as the name of God ought both
in cuery place & at euery time to be hallowed , whether it be by mi-
racles or by natural order of things.Thisfalfe colour might paraduc-
ture haue made thebettcr fhcw , if the Scripture did not informe vs
of y lawful end & vfc of mir3cles.For5Marke tcachcth that the figncs Mar.itf.
which followed the preaching of the ApolHes were (ct forth for the ^o-
confirming of it:Likcwifc Luke alfo faith y the Lord did beare witnes
to the worde of his gracc,whcn fignes and wonders were (hewed by
the handes of the Apoftles. Whcrwith wholly agreeth that faying of A^. i4»
the Aportlcjthat when the Gofpcll was preached, faluation was cor ^' .
firmed by this,that the Lord did bcare witnefie to it with fignes,and .^
w6dcrs,& diucrfe powers. But thofe things which we hearc to be the
fealings of the Gofpell, fhall we turne to the deftroyinge of the cre-
dit of the Gofpell?thofc things which are appointed only to ftabliih
the trueth,{hallwc apply to confirming of lyes?Therforeitis mete
that the dodrine , which (as the Euangeliftfayth)goeth before mira- j^l,„
cles,bc firft examined and tried. If that be allowed , then it may law- ig. a*»i
fully take confirmation of miracles . But of .t true dodrine (as Chrift 8. jo,
te3cheth)this is the marke,if it tende not to the feekinge of the glory
of men , but of God . Sith Chrift afhrmeth this to be the proofc of
dodrine, miracles are wrongcfully eftcmcd which arc drawen to any
other end than to glorifie the name of God alone. And wc ought to
remeber that Sathan hath his miracles which shhough they be iug-
gUngdcccues rather tha true po\vcrs,yet arc fuvh as may dccciue the
The Preface
ignorant and vnskilfuU. Mjgici.ins and cnchsuntcrshaucbinalwa^
famous in miracles : wonckrrull n^ir.iclcs bauc noundicd Jdolatric:
which yet do not prouc to v.s,thr.tthe fupcrftition of M igiciansand
idolaterj is lawcfull. And with this battringc rammc m olde time the
Donaiiitcs did Ihakc the limplicicy of the common peopie , for that
they excelled in miracles. Tiicrefore we do now m.ikc the fame an-
tnloh fwcretoo-jraducifaries, which Auguftine then made to tl.cDona-
traS./j. tiftcs:that the Lord hath made vs v/are agair.ft fuch miracle workers,
Mac. »4. when he foretoldc that there lliould come falfe prophcts,which with
/ Th C ^^'"^ 'ignes and diucrfc wonders,(hould,if it were polTiblc, bring the
J* ^^ elcdi into crrour. And Paulc hath giuen warning that the kingdomc
a.Cor. of Antichrirt Ihould be with all power,and %ncs, and lying wonders.
11.14. But thefc miracles ( fay they ) are done not of idols, not or forfcrers,
not of hifc prophets, but of the Saintes. As though we knew not that
this is the craft of Satan,to transfigure himfelfe into an Angtl of light
fjieretu ^" ^^'^^' ^'"^^ ^^^ Egyptians worilupped lercmy which was buried a-
inp*tfi. mongthrmjwith facrificer and other diuinchonois.Did not they a-
lerem. bufe tiic holy Prophet of God to idolatry ? And yet by fuch worfliip-
pmg of his tombe they obtained that they thought the healing ot the
ftingingoffcrpentcsto be the iuft reward thereof. What ihallwcfay:
but that ihis hath bin and euer (hail be the molt luit vengesunceof
God,to fend ftrcngth of lUufion to ihem that hauc not receaued the
a.Thcf. loue oi truc^h, that they may beleue lyingc f Tliercfore we want not
».»*• miracles, and thofc certainc,& not fubicd to cauillations. As for mi*
racles which th.cy bring forth for thcmfelues,:hey arc mecre illuhons
of Satan,forafmuch as they lead away the people from the true wor-
(hipping oKneir God to vanity.
Moi oucrjtlicy do flaudcroufly fct the Fathers againft vs ( T meanc
theauncicnt Fathers and the writers of the age as yet more vncor-
ruptcd)as though they had the for maintaincrs of their vngodlinclfc ;
by vvhofc autliority if the debate were to be ended , the better parte
of the vjdory(to fpeake euen moft modcUJy) would bend to our (kle.
But whereas many thingi s haue bin excellently well and wifely writ-
ten of thofe Fathers , and in Tome thinges , that hath happened to
them which is wont to happen to men:theie good natiira!! children
forfooth,accordfng to the nghtnes that they hauc,borh of v/it,mdgc-
ment.and mindc,do worOnp only their faultes and crrours: and thofc
things which arc wcl fpokcn.they either marke not,or fame as if they
knew them not , or do corrupt them : fo as a man may (ny that their
c.irc was alto<jrther to gather dungc in of the goldc of the Fathers.
Then they opptciic vs with importunate cryingc out againft vs , as
dcfpifcrs
To the French King.
^Icfpifcrs & enemies of the Fathers. But wc do ib not defpifc them,
thac ificwere the matter of my prcfentpurporc, I could very calily
prouc by their confenting voices , the greater part of thcfc things
that we fay at this day. But we fo rcade their writmgs, that we alway i.Cor.j
reincmber,that all things are ours,tc (erue vs, not to hauc dominion *'•
oucr vs : and that wc arc Chriftes alone , whom wc mutt obey in all
things without exception. Who fo kccpcth not this choilc'jflall hauc
nothm^^ ccrtaine in rchgion:forafmuch as rhofe holy men were igno-
rant of many thing$,do oftentimes ftnuc one with an ocher,yca and
fometimes right with thcmfelues. Not without caufe(fay they)wc
are warned of Salomon , that we palfenottheolde boundcs which Prouer.
our Fathers baue fct . But there is not all one rule in the boundingc pV
of ficldes , and the obedience of faith , whtch ought to bz fo framed „,
thac It forget her people and the houfc of her Fathcr.If they hauc (b
great delite tovfe allegories, why do they not rather expounde the
ApoilleSjthan any othcr,to be their Fathers,whofc appointed bouds
it IS notlawfull to plucke vp? for fo did Hicromc expounde itjwhofc
wordes they hauc regiftred among their Canos.But if they will haue
the boundes of the fame Fathers,whom they meane,to be ftecdfliftly
kept : why do they, fo oft as they lift , fo liccntioufly pafie them «' Of^.^^^^^
the number of the Fathers were they,of whom the one faid,thacour/j,/^/,i;y^
God cateih not, nor drinkcth,and that therforc he needeth neither rr.c'g,
cuppcs nor diflies: the other faid,that the holy things require not '^^''^/^
golde,and thac thofe things pleafe not with golde which arc not ^^^"^^
bought with golde. Therefore they pafTe the boundc , which arc.in 2s\ *
the holy things (o much dchted with golde, (iluer , iuorie , marble,
precious ftones & (ilkes.and thinke that God is not rightly worfhip*
pcd, vnlcflc altogether they be diflblucely fetout with exquihte gor-
geoufnes, or rather with outragious excelfc. A Father was he,which '^P)"^*
faidjthat he therefore did freely cate flerti on the day in which other ^jlVl*]
abftaincd , becaufe he was aChriftian. Therefore they paffe the c^^-j./o.*
boundcs, when theyaccurfe the foule that tafteth flefhc in Lent. Tupart.
Fathers were they , of whom the one faid that a Monkc which la- '"•'^ ^'•'»
boureth not with his handes , ts iudgcd as euill as a violent taker, or '^^,l'„f{
(if you wil)a robber : The other faid,thatit is notlavvful forMonkes de "eperc
to hue of other mens goods , although they be continually bufied in )»pna(h,
contemplations , in prayers , in ftudie. This boundc alfo they haue "'P*'?*
pafTed, when they placed the idle and barrcll belhcsof Monkesin
ftewesand brothelhoufes to be fatted with other mens fubftaunce. Epipfjont
A Father was he,which faid, that it is a horrible abhomination to fc '" '^'^*
any image paimcd,cither of Chrift or of any Sainteia the temples of "^trft!^'
The Preface
of many hath bin made a publikc crrour, or rather a comon confetit
ofviccsjwhich now thcfc good men would hauc to ftand for a lawc.
Who fo hauc eyes do fee that not only one fcaof cuils hath oucr-
flowed,many poyfonous pcftilcnces hauc innadcd the world>that ail
thinges runnc headlong to ruinc : fo that cither the matters of men
muft be vttcrly defpcired,or wc muft lay hand Ynto,or rather vfc vio*
^ Icnce vppon (6 great euiU. And remedy is by no other reafon driuen
di'ls c^. ^ -^^y ' ^"^ becaufe we hauc now lonp,e time accullomed vs to cuds,
fi.rK dc But be It chat publikc crrour hauc place in matters of comon wcale:
tofifutt. yet in the kingdom of God his only tructh is to be heard and regar-
ded,to which by no fuccecding courfc of yearcs, by no cuftomc, by
no confpired 3greement,may any prcfcription be limited.So in oldc
Efa.8. time Efay taught the eledof God,that they fhouldnoi lay Confpi*
'*• ringe> to all thinges in which the people faid C6fpiring;that is to fay,
that they (houid not confpirc together to the wicked agrccmct of the
people, nor fiiould fcarc and dread the peoples fearcbut rather that
they Ihould fandifie the Lord of hoftes, & he {hould be their feare 5c
dread. Now therefore let them as much as they lift obied againft v«
both palTed and prefent agcs,if we fandifie the Lord of hoftcs,we wil
not be much afraid. For whether it be that many ages hauc confen*
led to like vngodlines, he is ftrong to take vengeance to the third Sc
fourth gencrationror if the whole world together confpire into one
fclfe fame wickednclTejhe hath by experience taught what is the end
of them that ofFendc with the multitude , when he did with a gene-
3en.j.i rail ouerflowingdeftroy the whole kinde of me.preferuing Noe with
Hc.i 1.7 a r-r.al houfchold, which (liould by hi:, faith being but one man con-
dcmnc the whole world. Finally an cuill cuftome,is none other than
a common peftilcncc,in which they do neuertheleflc dye that dye
witii company of a muItitude.Morcouer they ought to hauc conGdc-
Epift.?. red that which Cyprian fayth in certainc placcs.that they which (inne
"Dilt ad ^y 'gnt)rance,3lthough they can not cleare thcmfclues from al fault,
[uiian. y/c ">ay feeme after fomc maner txcurablc:but who fo obftinatly re-
Ic here, fufc the rructh offrcd by the grace of God,thcy haue nothing to prc-
Mptiia. £cnd for their cxcufe.
As for their double horned argument , they do not driue vs to Co
hard n ftreiiiht with it,to copell.vs to confelfcihat either the Church
hath ly en dead a cenainc time, or that wc haue controucrfie againft
the Church.Trucly the Church of Chrift hath liucd and (hall liuc,fo
lonti as Chnft (hall reignc at the right hande of the Father: by whofc
handc (he is vpholdcn , by whofc luccour fhe is defended , by whofc
power Ihc kccpcth her fafctic. For he will vndouccdly pcrfcrme that
which
To the French King.
which he hath once promifedjthat he will be prcfent with his cucn Mat. it
vntill the cndinge of the worldc. Againlt it novve we haue no warre **•
at all. For we do with one confcnt together with all the people of
the faithfull honor and worfhip tiic one God and Chrift the Lorde,
in like forte as he hath alway been worlhipped of all the godly . But
they thcmfelues not a litlc way crre from the tructh , when they ac-
knowledge no Church , but which they fee with prcfent eie , and go •
about to compafle it about with thofc boundcs in which u is not en-
clofed. Vpon thefe pointes hangcth our controuerfie : Firft that they
afHrme thar the forme of the Church is alway appcnringc and to be
reene;thcn,thatthey fet the fame forme in the fee of the Church of
Rome , & in the order of their prelates. We on the contrary fide af-
firme , both that the Church may confift of no appearinge forme,
and that the forme it felfe is not contained in that outward (hining
ihewe , which they foolilhly haue in admiration , but hath n faire o-
thcr markc , namely the pure prcachingc of the worde of God , and
the right miniftration of Sacramcntes. They are in a rapc,vnlefl"c the
Church may be alwaycs pointed out with a finger.But how oft hap-
pened it in the people of the lewes to be fo defonnedjthat there ap-
peared no forme at all? What forme thinke we to haue {hined,when
Helias bewailed that he alone w3slefc?How long fince ihccomming r.Kfng.
of Chrift hath it lyen hidden without forme ? Howe fince that time 'i>.t*'
hath it bin fo opprcfl'ed with warrcs/editionSjand hcrefics,that it fhi-
ncd out on no fidc?If they had liucd at y timc,would rhcy haue bele -
ued that there was any Church?But it was fayd to Helias , that there
were prefcrucd feuen thoufand me, which had not bowed their knee
before Baal.Neither ought it to be douiful to vs but that Chrift hath
aUvay reigned in earth Cmcc he afcended into heaucn.But if the god-
ly had then fought any difccrnablc forme with their c!cs,rhould they
not byandby haue bin difcouragcd ? And verily Hylaric accompted (j^^^. ,
it cuen already in his time for a moft great fault, thatbeingcoccu- Auxei,.
pied with the foolifh admiration of the dignity of Bifhops, they mar- tmm.
kcd not a deadly pcftilcnce lurking vnder that vifor. For thus he fayth:
One tbinge I warne you , beware of Antichrift : for you are ill taken
WJth the louc of wals:ye do ill worfhip the Church of God in houfes
and buildinges : vnder them ye do ill thruft in the name of Peace. Ic
is doutfull that in thofe Antichrift fhall fitte?Mountaincs and woods,
and lakes , and prifons , and caues arc fafer for me . For in thefe the
Prophetes when they were cither abiding or throwcn into them, did
prophecy. But what doth the worlde at this day honor in his homed
Biihoppcs , but that ic chinkech them to be holy prelates of rehgion^
The Preface
whom it fccth to be hcadcs oucr great cities ? Away thfrefore with
s.TIm.i luch foolifh cftcming. But rather let vs Icjue this to the Lord.foraf-
i> much as he alone knowcth who be hiSj&romtimealfotaketh avray
from the fight ot men the outward knowledge of his Church. ThaC
is(I graunt)a horrible vengeance of God vpon the earth. But if the
wickcdncs of men fo dcferue, why do wc fcckc to withftand the iuft
vengeance of God ? In fuch wife ih« Lord hath in times paft taken
vengeance of tlic vnthankcfulncflc of men. For becaufc they would
not recciue his trucih, and had quenched his light, he luffrcd them
being blinded in fenfe , both to be mocked w:th lyes full of abfurdi-
ty, & lo be drowned in deepc darkencs, fo that there was no face of
the true Church to be fenc.Yet in the mcanc time he faued his both
being fcattcrcd abroad e & lying hidden in Dhe middeftofcrrours &
darlicneflejfrom deftrudion. And no marucl.For he can skill to fauc
both in the very confuiion of Babylon,& in the flame of the burning
ouen. But whereas they would hauc the forme of the Church to be
judged by T woie not what vaine pompous Ihcw : how perillous that
is,I will rather point vnto than dedarcleaft I fhoulde drawe out my
talc into infinite length. The Pope (fay they) which holdcth the A-
poltolikc fec,and the Buhoppes that arc annointed and confecrate by
him/o that they be trimmed with fillets and mi ters,do rcprcfcnt the
Church, and ought to be taken for the Church:& therefore they can
not errc.How foPbecaufe they are paftors of the church, & cofccrate
to the Lord. And were not Aaron and the ether rulers of Ifracll alfo
Exo, 3 : Paftors? But Aaron & his fonncs after that they were made prieftcs,
''• did yet errc when they made the calfc. After this reafon,why ihould
„. nor the fourc hundred Prophets which lyecT to Achab, hauercprc-
,, Tented the Church. But the Church was on Michcas fide, beinge in
ler.i 8 dccdr: but one m;»n aIone;and vnregarded , but out of whole mouth
^2- came truttli.Didnot the falfc prophetcs in refemblance bcare both
the name and face of the Church , when they did with one violent
alfaulc rife vp ?gamrt I eremy, & with threatning boafted that it wa»>
not pofTihlc that the law Oiould periih from the prieft,counfell from
the v/ircman,thc word from the Prophet f lercmy alone was fcnt a-
g3inft the whcle company of the IViphercs, to declare from the
Lordc, that it (hould come to paflc,that the l.uv fliouKi perilhe from
ihr priertjCOunfcU from the wifeman > and ;he wordc from the Pro-
phet. D'dnot fuch a wjirtcringcfliewclhmcin that Counccll which
the biOiops, Scribes, and Pliarifecs aff.^mblcd, to take aduifes toge-
ther for the killing of Chrift. Now let them go andflicke faft in the
outward vifour.ihat ihcy may make Chnft and all the Prophetcs ;jf
God>
I u uic rrcncn iv.ing.
God , fchifmtikcs : and on the other lidc make thcminifters of Sa-
than.thc inftrumcts of the holy G'noft If they fpeakc as tiicy thinke,
let them faithfully anfwerc me,in what nation and place they thinkc
that the Church remained Cnce the time that by the decree of the
Counccl at Bafiie, Eugenius was thruft downe and dcpriued from tlie
cftite of Popc,and Aymee fct in his place.Thcy can notjihough they
wouldc burit for it , deny that the Councell, for fo much as conccr-
ncth outwaid folemnitics , was lawfull, and fummoncd not oncly of
one Pope,but of two.Eugenius was there condemned of fchifme,re-
bellion , and obftmacy , with the whole flockc of Cardmals and Bi-
(hops,which had with him pradifcd the djflblution of the Councell.
Yet afterward bemge borne vp by the fauour of Princes,hc rctouc-
rcd his papacy fafe agame. That cledion of Aymee, which had bin
orderly piade by the authority of a gcncrall and holy Sy node , vani-
fhcd away m a fmoke : fauingc that he himfelfe was appeafcd with a
Cardinalls hat,as it were a barking dog with a pece of bread caft vnco
him. Out of the bofome of thefe hcretikes, rebels, & obftinates, are
proceeded all the PopeSjCardinallSjBiJfliops, Abbots,&' Prieftcs that
haue bin fince. Herethey arc taken and can go no further. For, to
whether iide will they giue the name of the Church? Will they deny
that the CounccU was gencrall , which wanted nothinge to the out-
warde maicftiernamcly, whicli beinge folcmnely fummoned by two
bullcs, and well fr.irned in the order of all thinge?, continued in the
famcdigiiitie to thelaft endc ? Will they confePie Eugenius with all
his company a fchifmatikc , by whom they arc all fanftjfied ? There-
fore either Ictte them otherv/ife define the forme of the Church > or
they all as many as are of the fhalbc of vs accompted fchifmatikcs,
which wittingly &wil!inglyhaue bin ordered of heretikcs. If it had
neuer before bin knowenjtliat the Church is not bounde to outward
pompcs, they themfelucsmay betovsalargeproofc, which vndcr
that glorious title of the Church hauc fo longe fo proudly boaftcd
thefclucs, whereas yet they were the deadly peibiences of the church.
I fpeake not of their mi^nerSjand thofe tra^icall doinges whcrev/ith
their whole life fwarmcth fulkbecaufe they fay that they be the Pha-
rifees which are to be heardjHotto be followed. But if yc will fparc
fom? of your leafure to read our writings,you fluall plainly know that
the very dodrin^jy do^rine it fclfe,for the which they fay that they
be the Church^is a desdly butchery of foules,the firebrand, ruine.d:
dcftrudion of the Church.
Finally they do not vprightly enough, when they do fpitcfully
rehcarfe howc great troubles, vprorcs, and cotemions the preaching
# * iij
rhc Prctacc
of our doftrinc hath ckawc with it,and what fruitcs it nowe bcarcth
m many. For the blame of thcfc cucls is vnworihily laide vpon it,
which ought rather to hatie bene imputed to y malice of Satan.This
is as It v/crc a ccrtainc naturall propretie of the word of God , that
whenfocuer it rifcth vp , Satan is neuer quiet or flecping. This is the
moft furc and mort ti uUy markc, whereby it is difcerncd from Ueng
dodrines,which do eafily (hewc forth themfelucs when they are re-
cciued with fauorablc cares of ail men , and are heard of the world
rcioilin^ at them. So in ccrtainc ages paft, vvhco all thmges were
drowned in deep? darkenclfe, the Lordc of this world made a (port
andapby inmaneiof all men, and lay idle andtokc his pleafurc
like a ccrtainc Sardanapalus in founde peace. For,what (hould he els
<Jobut laugh and play being in quiet and pcafiblc poflefTionof his
kingdomerBut v/hen the light fliining from about fomwhat fcattcred
abrode his darkn€{rc,when that ftrong man troubled and aflailed his
kingdom,thcn "r-c began to lliakc of his wonted drowfines,.& hafiiiy
to arme himfelfe. And fitft he Itirredvp the force of men,whereb)'
he might violently opprefTc the truth beginning to (hine. By which
whe he nothing preuailcd,he turned to futde entrappings.Hc ftirred
vp dilTcntions and difagreements ofdodrincs byhisCatabaptiiies,
and oiher monftruous lewdc men , whereby he might darken it and
at lcn';ih vtterly quenche it. And nowe hf- cotmucth to affaile it with
boih engines. For he trauailcth both by the force and power of men
to plucke vp that fecde, & with his dacntll (as much as /n him licih)
to choke it, thar !t may not growe & bcare frute. But ail this he doth
in vaincjif we ht arc the warning of God, which both hath long be-
fore opened his cm ftes vnto vs,rhat he lliould nor take vs vnwarc, &
haih aimed vs with fufficicnt defences againft all his cngins.But how
grestmaliciournedc is it to lay vpon the word of God the hatred
cither of the fcdicions , which noughty and rebellious men do ftirrc
vp,or of thcfc^'TS which decciuers 60 raifc againi^ i(?Yet ic is no new
examplc.Elias was af^cd whether it were not he that troubled Ifracl.
Chrift was eftccmed of the Icwes a fcditious man.Thc Apoftles were
accufed of making a comotion among the people. What other thing
do they which at this day 60 father vpon vs all the troubles, vprorcs
and cotentions thar boilc vp againft Vif" But what is to be aunfwercd
tofiich. Eliashatli taught vs : namely that ic is not we ihat fcatter
errors or ftirrc vp vprorcs:but it is they ihefclucs that wraftlc againft
the power of God. But as that one thing alone is fuflicicnt to bcatc
backe their raflieneftc . fb agame wc ouuht to mete with the wcak^-
ncffc of other,who oficcimcs happen to be moucd with iuch offences,
and
1 u tiic rrciim iv.iiig.
andin their difmaycng to waucr.Eut let them , to the cnde that they
may not faint with this difmayeng and te difcoragedjlmov/c that the
Apoftlcs in their time felte by experiece the fame things that now c
happen vncovs. There were vnlerriedand vnftedfaft men, which
wrcfted to their owne deftrudiqn,thofe things the Paul had written 5, Pet
bythcinrpiration of God , as Peter faith. There were defpifcrs of i^.
God , which when they heard that finne abounded to the end that ^"^
grace might more abounde , by and by obieded, We wiU then abide * *
in finne, chat grace may abound. When they heard that the faithfuil
are not vnder the lawe,they by and byjanf\vered,We will then finne,
becaufe wc arc not vnder the lawc,but vnder grace.ThcFe v/erc that
ttccufed him as an cxhortcr to euell. There cntred priuily many filfc Phjlfj
Apoftlcs to deftroy the Churches which hehadbuilded. Some by >"»5»
enuie and contention, and not purely , yea and malicioufly pre:iched
the GofpcUjthinking to addc more afflsdion to his bjndis.Somwhere
the Gofpell not much profited. All fought their owne , and not the
tbinges of lefiis Chrift. Some wcnte backwarde , doggcs to their
vomite , and fwine to their wallowing in the mire. T he moft parte
did drawc the hberty of the Spirit to rhe licentioafncfie of the flefii.
Many brethren crept in, by whom there came afterwarde great dan-
gers to the godly. Amog the brethren themfelues were raanv ftriues
railed vp. What (hould the Apoftles haue done in this cafe ? Should
they not either haue diflcmbled for atimcjor rather altogether haue
geucn oucr and forfaken the Gofpell which they fawe co be the
fedeplott of fo many contentions ,thc matter of fo many dangers,
the occafionoffo many offences J'No.But for helpein fuchdifirefl'es
this came in their minde thatChrifl: is the ftoneof ftombiingan^
rocke of offence, fet vntotheruine and rifingagaine of :nr.ny,and m!<.3
for a figne that fhould be fpokcn againft. With which afnancc they 3^,
being armed went forward boldly through all dangers of vpt ores and
ofFcnccs.With the fame thought we alfo ought to be vpliolden,for-
afmuchas Paul teftifieth that this is the perpctuallpropretie cf the '•'^^'
Gofpclljto be the fauor of death vnto death to the y peri{li,akhoi;gh ^' ' '
it were ordcined to this vfc that it fhould be the fauor of lifcviita
life, and the power of God vnto the faluation of the faithfuil ; which
verily we fhould alfo feele , if we did not with our vnthakfulnes cor-
rupt this fo fingular a benefit of God, & turnc j to our pwne deftriw
dion which ought to haue bin to vs ihe only defence of our fafeiie*
Butnowe I returne to you , my foueraignc Lordc. I^et thofcfalfc
rcportes nothing moue you, by which our aduerfaries trauaili to Cuft
you in fcarc of vs, with ftying that by this newe Gofpoll (for fo they.
*^ iiij
The Preface
call it) nothing is hunted for and foughr but fit occafion of fcdiiions,
and vnpuniflied liberticof wees. For our God is not the author of
dmilion, biit of peace •■ and the fonae of God is not the miniftcr of
finne,which came to deftroy all the workes of the Deuill. And we arc
vn worthily accufcd of fuch dcfires , whereof we ncuer gaue any fu-
fpition were it ncuer fo fmall. It is likely that we forfoth do pradift
the ouerthrowing of kingdomcs,ofwhom there hath neucrbcnc
heard anyone fedicious word , whoes life hath euer bene knowen
quiet and fimple , when we liued vnder you , and which nowe being
chaced from home yet ccflc not to pray for all things profperous to
you and ytWjr kingdomc. It is likely forfoth that we hunt for hcen-
tioufncfl'e of vices , in whocs bchauors although many thingcs may
he foundc faulty.yct there is nothing worthy oi Co great reprochmg:
neither h^ue we with fo ill fuccelTe ( by the grace of God) profited
in the Gofpell,but that our life may be to thefe backbyters an exam*
plar of chafiiticjlibcralitic, mercy, temperance, patience, modelhc,
and wlutfocuer other vertue. Verily it is by the proofc it felfe euidet
thatv/c dovnfainedly fearc and worfhippe God j forafmuch as Wd
lienrc that his name be halowcd both by our life and our dcath,and
cnuy It felfe is compelled to bearc of fome of vs a wimeffe of inno-
cence & ciuilc vprichtnc0c,in whom this onely thing was punifhed
with death which ought to haue bene accepted for a lingular praife.
But if any vnder prfctcncc of the Gofpell do ftirre vp tumultes (as
hethertoithath not bene foundc that there haue bene any fuch iri
your Re3lmc)if any pretcnde the libertic of the grace of God to de-
fendc the hcetioufneflc of their fices (of which fort I haue knowca
many) there be lawes and penalties of lawcs , by which they may ac*
cording to their dcfcruingcs be (harpcly punilhed : yet fo that in the
roeane time the Gofpell of God be not euell fpoke of for the wickedr*
ncfie of naughty men. Thus haue you (O King) the venimous vniu-
fiicc of the fclaunderors largely enough declared , that you may not
wiih an care of to cafy belicfe bende to their reportes. Ifearemc
alfo Icafl it be to largely fct out , forafmuch as this preface is in a ma-
fier come to the quantitie of a whole boke of dcfcnfc.whercby I cn-
tendcd not to make a defcnfe in dcedc > but onely to mollify your
minle aforehandc to geue audience totbc difdoiing of our caufe:
ivhich your minde,though it be now turned away and eftranged from
VS , yea and cnflimed againft vs , yet we truft that we (hall be able to
recouer the fauor thereof, if you fhall ones haue without difplcafure
and troublous afFc<flion red oucr this our confeffion , which wc will
to be in ftccde of a defence for v$ loyour maicfty.fituc if chc whifper-
ingc$
ingcs of the malicious do fo poflcfle your care$,thai there is no place
for accufcd men to Tpcakc for themfclucs-.and if tliofe oucragioui fu-
ries do ftill with your winking at them, excrcifc cruelty with prifon*
iiing,tormenting,cutting,and burning: we fhall in dedc,asflicpc ap-
pointed to the (bu^hteijbe brought to all enremitics,yct fo that in
our patience we Hiall pofllffe our foules, and waitcfortheftrongc
hande ot the Lord : which (hall without dout be prefcntin time,anci
ftrctch forth it felfc armedjboth to deliucr the poore out of afflidion,
and to take vengeance on the defpifcrs, which now triumphc with (o
great alTurcdncflc.
The Lord the King of Kings ftablifh your throne wirh righ-
teoufnejQcjand your featc with cquity,moit noble King.
M Bajtie thefirfi day ofAhguji^m thiyeare, * J S ^«
lOHN CALVINE TO
THE READER.
, T^hefirjl fating out oftlm rvork^etbeceoifc 1 did not loJ^
JOY thatfuccejje , which the Lorde of his 'vnmeafurabie
Igoodnes hath giue, I had(^ai me vfe to do infmal workesy
for the more part lightly pajfed it oner. But rvhe I ynder-
^ftode that it rvoi receiued vith thatfauor ofal the godly ^
which I neucr durft haue dcjired , much lejje haue ho"
pedfor : as I verily felt in nry hart that much more wa^giuen to me than I
had defertied,fo I thought it fhould he a great 'vnthanl^efulnes ifljhoulde
not at the Icaji after m}'fcledcr ability endeuor to anfvere fofauorable af-
fections toward me, <^ rvhich ofthemfelucs prottokcd my diligecc. jind this
I attempted not only in the fecond fetting forth ofit:but how oftfince that
time the worke hath bin emprinted ,fooft it hath bin enriched with fome
tncreafe.Rut although I did not then repent me of the labor that 1 had em-
ploy ed.yet I neuer held my felfe contented till it was dij^ofed into that or-
der which is nowfet before youJ^w I trujl I haue giueyou that which may
he eUowed by ally our iudgementes. Truely with how great endeuor I haue
applied my felfe to the doinge of this feruice to the Church of God , 1 may
brin^ forth for an euident witnejfe^that this lafl winter ywhen I thought that
thefeuer Quartane had fummonedmc to death, how much more the ficke-
ties enforced vpon me.fo much leffe I jparedmy fclfcytiU I might leaue thtt
boolte to ouerliue me,which might mak^ fome part ofthanl^cfullrecompenft
to fo gentle prouoking of the godly. I had rather in dede it had bin donefo-
ner.biit it isfuone enough if well enough, Jnd I ft) all then thinl^c that it is
come abroade in ^ood feafon^when ifhallperceiue that it hath brought yet
more l)let7:ifu'f fi'fite thait hath done heretofore to the Church ofGod.This
is my only dcfre.^4r.d tritely fttU ill it were with me,ifl did notjjolding my
fclfc contented rcith the alloivance of God alone, de/pife the iudgemcntj of
men whether they be thefooliflj ^ jroward iudgementa of tiie ynsl^ilfulU
er the wrcgfuU <^ malicious of the wicli^cd. Vor although God hath through -
/)' fettled my riindc to the endeuor both of enlarging his l^ingdome^ and nf
helping the common profit: although 1 am clcarc in wine owne confiencey
^ haue himfeljc <^ the yJngels to witncffe with me^thatfnce I tool'^c -vpon
mc the ofjice of a. teacher in the ChurJhl haue tended to none other fttrpofe
but
lotheKeaaer.
hut thai 2 mJght profit the Church in maintaining thepuvedoEffine ofgod-
Unes.yet I thirike there p< no man,that hath binfnatched aej?ittenyi^ tome
in [under with moe fclauders than I. Vyhen my epiflle wa^ noro in priming,
I rvas certainly enformed that at ^ugshurgh where theajfebly ofthejiates
of the Empire was holden,there was a rumor ^r tad abroad of my rcuoUifige
to the Vapacy y andthe fame was more greedely recciued in the comtesof
'princes than was meete. Thpsforfooth is their thankefulnes who are noti-
^norant of many trialis had ofrnyjiedfaflnes^ which trialls as they [hak^ of
fofowlc afclaunder^fo they fhould with allindifferet ^ ^tle iudges haue
defended me from it. But the Deuill with his whole route is decciucd if iit
o^pyefjing me with filthy liesyhe tl>iKke that by his -vniufi dealinge I'fhalbe
either the more difcouraged or made the leffe diligent : becaufe I trttfi that
the Jjovd of his ijnmeafurable goodner willgraunt me that I may with eucn
fujfcr£.nce continue in the courfe of his holy calling, f^f^hereof I giue to the
godly readers a new proofe in this fettinge foorth of this bool^e. TSlow in thit
. trauaiUthis wasmypnrpofe fo toprepare andfurnijh them that be fiudiom
of holy Diuinity to the reding of the word of God^that they may both haue -
an eafie entry into it^and go forward in it without fiumblinge :for I think^
that 1 haue in all point csfo l^nii vp together the fi*mme of religion , and di-
Jpofed the fame in fuch order^ that whofoeucrfi) all well haue it in mindejt
fhal not be hard for him to determine both ivhat he ought chiefly to feeh^
in the Scripture , and to what marh^ to apply whatfveuer is contained in it.
Thercfore^ihis as it were a way being once madeplaine^ if 1 f hall hereafter
fet forth any expofitiom of Scripture Jsecaufe ifioftllnot necdc to enter into
long difputations of articles ofdocfrine^&to wander out into common pla-
ces:lwiU alvay kriit themypfhortly. By this meane the godly reader fhal-
be cafcd of great paine andtedioufneffc y fo that he ccme fur ni (he d afore"
hande with the knowledge of this prefcnt worl^e as with a nece/piry infirU'
went. But becaufe the entent of this parpofe ,dc th clear ely as ip mm-ors ap"
peare in fo many commentaries of mine , 1 haa rather to declare in deede
Kffhat it is^ than toft it out in wordes . Farewellfendly lieader,<indifthcu
recehte anyfiute of my laborsyhelpeme with thy prayers to God our Father.
At Gcncua the firft day of Augaft in the ycprc. j 55^.
Auguftinc in his vij. Epiftlc,
J^ofcjfe myfelfe to be one of the number of them^tchich
wryte inprofitingyand profit in writing.
WHAT CHAPTERS ARE CON^
taincd in the bookcs of this Inftitution.
^ thefrjl booh^e which entreaterh of the li^oxc ledge of Godtht
Creator: Are contained xviij. Chapters.
> l^^^o^^^Hat the knowc- 9 Thatthofcfantafticallmcnne,
jcd^cof God, & vvhichforfakingc Scripture, rcforte
;of our fclues, arc rnto rcuclation,do oucithrowc all
thingcs conioy- the principles of godlincfTc.
ncd;& how they lo That the Scripture , to corrc<fl
be Imcked the alirupcrftition, dothincomparifon
One with the other. fer y true God againft all the Gods
* What it is to knowe GGd,& to of the Gcntils, reckeningc him for
^'hat cndc tcndeth the knowledge none of them.
oi him. 1 1 That i c is vnlawful to attribute
5 That the knowledge of God is vnto God a vifible forme, and that
naturally planted in the mindcs of generally ,they forfakc Godjfo ma-
mcn. ny as do cred to thcmfclucs any i-
4 That the lame knowledge is ei- mages.
ther choked or corrupted, partely iz ThatGodis fcufirally difccrned
by ignorance,& parrly by malice, from idols , that he may be only &
5 Thatthcknovveledgeof God wholly worfhippcd.
t^ofh Hiiningely appcare in the ma- 1 5 That there is taught in y Scrip-
king of the \voild,and in the conti- tures one effcnce of God from the
nuill goucrnment thereof. very crearion , which cflcncc con-
6 That to ottainc to God the laincthinitthicepcrfons.
creator, it is neeticfuU to hnuc the 14 That the Scripture euen in the
Scripture to be our guide and a^ai- creatio of the world & of al thin£;s,
ftrefle. dothby ccrtainc markcsput diffe-
7 By what tcf^imonic the Scrip- rence bctwcne the true God, and
tare ought to be ftablidicd, that is, faincd Gods,
bythewitncffcof the holy Ghoft, i^ What a one man was created:
that the authority thereof may re- wherein there iy entreated of the
mainc certain: And that it is a wic- powers ofthc fonic,?^ of the image
ked inuention to fav that the ere- of Godjof free will, and of the Hill
ditthcrcof doth hange vppon the inte^ritie of nature,
iudgemcnt of the Church. 16 That God by his power doth
8 That fof3r3sm3n$rcaron may noutifliand main^ainc theworldc,
bcare,there arc fuHRcienf proucs to which himfche hath created, & by
(tablilK the credit of tlic Scripture, his prouidcncc doth goucrne al tht
partes
1 1
The Tabic
pwccs thereof. 18 That God doth fo rCc the Per-
17 Whereto .ind to what end this uicc of wicked mcn,and To bovveth
doiftrinc is to be apphcd , that v/c their mind;;s to put bis ludgemenc
may be ccrcainc of the profit thcr- in execution , that yet ftill himfelfc
of. remaineth pure from all fpot.
Inthefecond Booke which entreateth of the k^o^viedge of God the Kedemfr
inChriit, vvhidi knovvlcdgcvvas firftopcoctl co the .'achcrs in coc
time of the lavvc, and tiicn to vs in the Gofpell;
Are conteincd xvij. Chapters.
'Hat by Adamas Cm and fal- Gofptll.
hng away ^mankind became 10 Of the likencfle of the oldc
accurfcd^and did degenerate from and ncwe Teftamenr.
hiifirfteftate:wherin is entreated 11 Of the difference of the oac
of Originall finnc. Tcftamcnt from the other.
1 That man is nowe fpoiled of ii Thatit behoucd, thacChrift
the frccdome of wiU,and made fub- to performe the office of the Me-
ied to mifcrable b.ondagc. diator,f}iould be made man.
5 Thatoutof the corrupt nature ij That Chrift tooke vpon him
of ma procedcth nothing but dam- the triicfubftace of yflefli of man.
nable. 14 Howe the natures of the Mc-
4 HowGodwotkeihinthehar- diator do make one perfon.
tesofmcn. 1$ That we may knowc to what
5 A confutation of the obic(5tios ende Chrift was fent of his father,
that are wont to be brought for the & what he brought vsrthrec things
defence of free will. are principally to be confidercd in
6 That man being loft, muftfckc him, his Prophcticall ofiice, his
for redemption in Chrift. kingdome,& his Priefthodc.
7 That the lawe was gcucn , not 16 Howe Chrift hath fulhiled the
to holdc ftill the people in it, but to office of Rcdemer,to purchafe fsl*
nourilTie the hope of faluation in uation for vs, wherein is entreated
Chrift vntill his comming. of his Death and Refurre(ftion,and
8 An expoiiriyofthe Moral law. his Afccnding into hcauen.
9 That Chrift although he was 17 That itis trucly and properly
knov/e to the lewcs vndcr the law, fayd, y Chrift hath dcferucd Gods
yet was i^ deliucred oncly by the fauour :ind fiUiation for vs.
In the thrrdEoh^ which enrrcateth o{the wancr howetoreceiue the ^ace
of Chrift, and what Fruites come chcrc<f to vs,and vvliac cffccics
rollovve of It: Areconccinrd xxv.Chapters.
t 'T-'Hat thofc things which arc V5 , bv fccrct working of the holy
X fpokcn of Chrift do profit Ghoft.
The Table
2 Of faithjV.'hcrin both is the de u What is the beginning of fa-
finicion of It, & the properties that ftificacion , and the contmiwH prof-
it hath arc dcchrcd. ceding thereof.
3 That we arc regenerate by 15 That thofe things chat are co-
faith, wherein is entreated ot Re- monly boailed coccrning themc-
pentancc. rites ofworkcs, dooiierthroweas
4 Thjt all that the Sophifters wellthcpraifeofGod in queuing of
babble in their Schooles of pc- rightcoufncfTe , as alfo the airured-r
nance,is farrc from the purcnes of nefle of faluation.
the GolpcU : where is entreated of 16 A cofucation of the flaunders,
confcnioaand Satisfaftion. whereby thcPapiftesgo about to
5 Of the fupplyings which th ey bring this dodrinc in hatred,
adde to faiisfadionSjas Pardons and 17 The agrccmCt of the promi-
Purgatory, fes of the Lawc and the GofpeH.
6 Of the hfe of a Chriftian man. 18 Thacof ihereward,the rightc-
And firil by what arguments the oufnefTeofworkesisill gathered,
fcripturc exhorteth vs thereunto, 19 Of Chnftian liberty.
7 The fummc of a Chriftian life; 20 Of Prayer which is the chicfe
where is entreated of the forfaking cxercifc of faith , and whereby
of ourfclucs. we daily receiue the bencfiics of
8 Of the bearing of the CrofTc, God.
which is a parte of the forfaking of 21 OfthcetcrnaIlelcdi«j, wher-
our (clues. by God hath prcdcflinate Tome to
9 Of the meditation of the life faluation, fomc other to deftru*
to come. dion.
10 Howe wc ought to vfe this 2X A cofimationof thisdodrihc
prcfentlife,3nd the helpes therof. by the teftimonies of Scripture.
11 Of the lufhHcation o{ faith, 25 A confutation of the (laun-
& firft of the definitio of the name ders, wherewith this dodrinc haih
and of the thing. alvvay bene vniuftly char^ied.
1 2 That to the ende wc may be 24 That Eieclion is ftablifhcd by
fully pcrfuaded of the free lulbfi- ihc calling of God : & rhat the rc-
cation, W'j mi'rt lifte vp our mindes probati: do bnng vpo thcfclues the
to the iudgcmcnt featc of God. iui\ dcftrudtion,to which they arc
i^ That th^rc arc two thin^^s to appointed.
bemarKcdinfiee lullificaiion. 25 0[ the Inft Rcfurredioii.
in the fotirth BooJ^e ^vhkh entreateth of the ott/n'irrdrncanes or helmet
whereby God callcth vs into the Fellowship of ChrJlt,jnd
hoIdctS vs in ic «re coiit 4medxx.Chaprcrs.
1 f^V the true Church with vnitic , bicaufc ic is the mother of
V^svhich wc ought ro kecpc allthc godly.
The Tabic
i A coparifon of ^ falfc Church butchery vpon foules.
with the true Church. ir Of the iurifdi^lion of the
J Of the teachers and minifters Church,ancl the abufc thcrcof/uch
of the Church, & of their Eledion as is fene in the Papapc.
and office. 12. Ofy difciphnc of y Church,
4 Of the ftate of y oldc Church, whereof the chicfc vfc is in the ccn-
and of the mancr of gouerning furcs and excommunication.
that was in vfc before the Papacy. 1 j Of vowes , by rafhc promi-
5 That the old forme of gouern- fing whereof eche man hath mifc-
mcnt is vtterly ouerthowcn by the rably entangled himfelfc.
tyranny of the Papacy. 14 Of Sacramentes.
6 Of the Supremacy of the Sec i^ Of Baptifme.
of Rome. t6 That the BaptiHns of Infants
7 Of the beginning & encrcafing doth very well agree with the in-
of y Papacy of Rome, vntill it ad- ftitution of Chrift, & the nature of
uaced it felfe to this height,whcrby the fignc.
both ylibertic of the Church hath ij Of the holy Supper of Chrift:
bene oppreiled , and all the right andwhatitauailcthvs.
goucrnmcnt thereof ouerthrowen. 18 Of the Popifhc Maflc , by
8 Of the power of the Church which facrilege y fupper of Chrift
as touching the articles of faith: hath not onely bene prophancd,
and with howe vnbridcled hccn- but aJfo brought to noughc.
tioufncfTc it hath in the Papacy 19 Of the fiue falfely named Sa-
benc wreftedto corrupt all pure- cramentes: where is declared, thac
neffc of dodrine. the other fiue which hauc bene.
9 Of Councellsandof theiraU' hitherto commonly taken for Sa-
thoritie. cramcnres, are not Sacramentes:
10 Of the power in making of and then is fhewed what nianer of
lawcs wherein the Pope and his things they be.
hauc vfed a moft cruell t)T:anny & lo Of Ciuile goucrnemcnc.
I
a
THE FIRST BOOKE OF
THE INSTIT VTION OF
CHRISTIAN RELIGION, WHICH
intreateth of the knowledge of
God the Creator.
The firft Chapter.
That the knowledge efGod , and of our felueSy are things contoyntd:
and how they be linked the one with the other.
C%i Q0^ fn H E whole furnme in a mancrof all our wifHom-
I which onely ought to be accompted true and perfcd
Vifdome , contifteth in two parts , that is to fay , the
knowledge of God, & of our felues.But wheras thefc
two knowledges be with many bonds hnked togi-
thcr: yet whether goeth before or cngendreth the
other>it is hard to di'fcernc. For Hrft no man can looke vpo him felfe,
but he muft needes by and by turne all his fcnfes to the beholding of
God , in whom he liueth & is moutd : becaufc it is playne that thofc
giftes whcrwith we be indued are not of our felueSjyca eucn that that
we haue being is nothing els but an eflence in the one God. Finally,
by ihefe good thinges that are as by dropmeale powrcd into vs from
heauen , we are led as it were by certaine ftreames to the fpring head.
And fo by our owne needinefie , better appeareth that infinite plcntic
of good thinges that abideth in God. Specially that mifcrable ruine,
whcreinto the fall of the firfte man hath throwen vs,cotnpelleth vs to
lift vp our eyes, not onely beyng foodcles and hungry , to crauc from
thence that which we lacke j but alfo being awakened with fearc , to
leame humditie . For as there is found in man a certaine world of all
mifcries, & llncc we haue bene fpoyled of the diuine apparell, our
fhamcfullnakednefle dilclofeth an infinite heapc of filthy difgrace-
ments : it mult needes be that euery man be pricked with knowledge
in confcjence of his own vnhappinefle to make him come at Icaft vn-
to fome knowledge of God . So by the vnderftanding of our ownc
ignorance,vanitie,beegery weaWenes, perucrfncs, and corruption,wc
learne to reknowlcdge that no where clfe but in the Lord abideth the
true light of wifdom, found vertue, perfede aboundance of all good
thinges , and puritie of righteoufnes . And fo by our owne euils wc
are ftirred to cofider the good thmgs of Godrand wc cannot earncfllr
A
Cap. I. Of the knowledge of
afpirc towardchim, vntill we bcginnc tomillikcourrdues. For of all
men what one is there , that would not willingly rtit in him Tcltc ?yea
who doth not reft, fo longe as he knoweth not him fclfcjthat is to fay,
fo long as he is contented with his owne g>fts, and ignorat or vnmind-
full of his owne mifcry ? Therfore euery man is by the knowledge of
him fclfc , not onely pricked forward lo fecke God , but alio led as it
were by the hand to finde him.
2 Agayneitis ccrtaine , that man neuer commeth vnto the true
knowledge of himfelfe, vnles he haue firlt beholden the face of God,
and from beholding ihcrof do dcfcend to looke into himfelfe . For
(fuch is the pride that is naturally planted in vs) we alway thinkc our
felues righteous , innocent , wife and holy , vntiU that with manifeft
proues wc be couinced of our vnrighteoufneSjHlthines,folIy and vn-
^leannes But we are not conuinccd tiicrofjif we looke vpon our fclucs
onely, & not vpon God alfo, who is the only rule whcrby this iudgc-
ment ought to be tryed. For bccaufe we are naturally inclined to hy-
pocrifie , therfore a ccrtaine vayne rcfemblance of righteoufnes doth
aboundantly content vs in ftcad of righteoufnes in deede. And becaufe
there appeareih nothing amon^ vs , nor about vs , that is not defiled
with much hlnhines,therfore that which is fomcwhat Idle filthy plea-
fethvsas though it were moftpure, folongas weholdeour felues
within the boundes of mans vnclennes. Like as the eye that is \Ccd to
fee nothing but blackjthinketh that to be pure \vhite,vvhich yet is but
darkifh white,or browne. Ye3,we may yet more playncly difcerne by
our bodily fcnfe how much we are blinded in confidering the powers
of the foule. For if at midday we either looke down vpon the ground,
or behold thofe thingcs that rounde about lye open before our eyes,
then we thinke our felues to haue a very afifured and percing force of
fight;but when we looke vp to the funnc, & behold it with fixed eyes,
then that fame HiarpnclTc that was of ^reat force vpon the i^round, is
with fo great brightnes byandby dafeled and confounded, that we arc
compelled to confcfle that the fame fliarp fight which wc had in con-
fidering earthly things , when it commeth to the funnc is but meerc
dulncflj. Euen lo commeth it to paflcin weyingour fpirituall good
thinps. For while wc looke no further then the earth , fo longe beyng
well contented with our own righteoufnes, wifdom and ftrength, we
do fwectely flatter our felues, and ihinkc vs in maner halfc gods. But
if we once bcginnc to rnyfe vp our thought vnro God & to wey what
a one he is, and howe cxa6t is the pcrftdion of his righteoufnes, wifc-
domand power, after the rule wlierof we ought to be framed: then
that whicli before dydpleafc vs in our felues with falfc pretence of
right c-
God the Creator. Lib.i. 2
riehteoufnes , fhall become iothfom to vsas grcateft wickcdntfle;,
the that which did marueiloufly deceiue vs vnder colour of wifdom,
(hall iVinke before vs as extreme folly : then that which did beare the
face of ftrengih,(hal be proued to be moft miferable weaknes.So flen-
derly doth that which in vs fecmeth euen mofte pcrfc(ft, anfwere in
proportion to the purenes of God.
^ Hereof proceedeth that trembling & amafedncs , wherewith the
fcripture in many places recireth that the holy men were flrikcn and
aftoniflied fo oft as they perceyued the prefence of God.For when we
fee that they which in his abfence did ftad aflured & vnmoucd, fo fonc
as he difdofeth his glory, begin fo to quake and arc fo difmayd^that
they fall downe , yea are fwalowed vp & in mancr as dtftroyed with
feare of death: it is to be gathered therby that man is neuer fufficiemly
touched and inwardly moued with knowledge of his owne bafenes>
vntiU he haue compared himfelfe to the maieftieof God.Butof fuch
difmaying we haue often examples both in the ludges & in the Pro - lud i j.
phets: fo that this was a common faying among the people of Goo: 2--
We (hall dye becaufe the Lord hath appeared vnio vs. And therfore ^^^-^'^
the hiftory of IoZ»,to throw men downc with knowledge of their owne
folly,weakncs,& vnclennes,bringethalway hisprincipall proofc from
defcribing Gods wifdom, ftrength and clcnnes. And that not without
caufe. For we fee ho\w Abraham, the nererthathe came to behold the „
glory of God, the better acknowledged himfelfe to be earth and duft. '
We (eehow Elins could not abide to tary his comming to him with
vncouered face : fo terrible is the beholding of him. And what maie i.King
man do that is but corruption & a worme, when eue the Cherubins i,^' ' 3«
for very feare mufte hide their faces? Euen this is it that the Prophet ^* *^
Efay fpeaketh of: The funne fhall bluflie, & the ifioone fliall be aflia- Ha^j.,©
med, when the Lord of hoftes fiiall raigne, that is to fay,when he dif- anu i^.
playeth his brightnes , and bringeth it nearer to light , then m com -
parifon thereof the brighteft thing of all fhall be darkened. But how-
foeuer the knowledge ot God and of our felues , are with muruall
knotte linked together,yet the order of right teaching requireth thac
firft we intrcate of the knowledge of God , and after come downe to
ipcake of the knowledge of our felues.
I
The fecond Chapter.
VVhat it h to kpovvt God, and to what cndt tcndtth thf ktiowltdrt oj him.
Meane by the knowledge of God, not only that knowlcd£:e,whcr-
by we conceiue that there is fomc God, but alio that, whtrby wc
Icame fo much as behoueth vs to know of him , & as is protit^blc
A iy
Cap. 2. Of the knowledge of
for his glorie , finally Co much as is expcdienc . For , to fpcake pro-
perly, we can not fay ;ha: God is knowcn wlicic there is no religion
nor godlincfle. But hcere I do not yet touch that fpcciall kindc of
knowledL;e whereby thofc men that are in thcmfclues reprobate and
accurftddoconceiucGodthercdet-merinChrift the mediator: but
I fpeake onely of that firft and (implv mancr of knowledge, whcrvnio
ihc very order of nature would hauc led vs, if Adam had continued in
ftatc of innocecie.For although no :T)an,lich mankindc is in this ruine,
can perceiuc God to be eyth»r a f.uhcr, or author of faluation, or in
any wife fauourable, vnles Chnft come as a meane to paciHe him to'-
warde vs : yet it is one thing to fceic that God our maker doth by his
power fuftaine vs,by his prouidcncc goutrnc vs,by his goodnes nou-
nfh vs,& endue vs with all kinds of bUfl'inPs:& an other thin;: to em-
brace the grace of rcconciliano offered vs in Chrift.Wheras therforc
the Lord firft fimply appcareth as well by the making of the woild,as
by the generalldodrine of the fcripture,to b: the Creator, & then in
the face of Chrift to be the redeemer, hcrvpo arife two forts of kno-
wing him, of which the former is now ro be intrcatcd of, & then the
oiher Hiall orderly follow in the place he lor it For although our mind
can not conceiue the knowledge of God, but that it muft giue to him
fome kind of worfhip,yet fhall it not be fufficient (imply to know that
it is he only that ought to be honored & worfhipped of all mcn,vnles
we be alfo perfwaded that he is the foiitaine of all good things, to the
end that we fl)ould fecke for no thing cllewhere but in him . I meane
hereby,not only for that as he hath once created this world, fo by his
intinirc power he fufteineih ic , by his wifdom he gouerneth it, by his
goodnes he prefcrueth it, & fpccially mankind he ruleth by his righ-
tcoufr.es iSi i'ldgetnentjfuffreth by his mcrcv,& fauegardcth by his de-
ftncc:but alfo becaufc there cnti no where be found any one drop ei-
ther of wifdom,or of light,or of nghtcoufncs, or of power, or of vp-
righpics, or of lincerc truth, which tlowcth not fro him or whereof he
is not the caufciio this end verely,that we fliouldlcarncto looke tor &
craue all thcfe things arhis hand, & with thankfgeuingaccompt them
. receiucd of him. For this feelin^»f the powers of God is to vs a mete
fcholcmaft er of godlines,out of which fpnngeth religion : Godlines I
call a rcucrcncc of God loincd with loue of him which is procured by
knowledge of his benefits. For men will ncucr with willing obedience
fubmit the fclues to God.vntill they pcrceiue that they owe all things
to him,that they are nounflicd by his fatherly care, that he is to them
the author of all good things, fo that nothing is to be fought clfcwher
than in him. Yea they will ncucr ydd ihcfclucs trucly & with all their
liarc
God the Creator. Lib.i. 3
heart vvholcly to him, vnlcs chcy alfuredly beieuc that in him is per-
fed fchcitie repored for them.
2 Therfore they do but trifle with vainc fpcculations, which in
cntrcaring of this quelhoii ,do make it their purpofe to difculTe , \:hat
thing God is , where it rather behoueth vs to know what maner one
he IS, and what agrceth with his nature. For to what end ferueth it to
confcire as Epicure doth, riiat ther is a God which doth only delight
him fclfe with idlenes,hauing no care of the worldePFinallyjwhat pio-
fiteth It to knowe fuch a God witli v^d^om we may haue nothing to
do? But rather the knowledge of him ought to ferue to this endejfirft
to frame vs to fearc & reuercure: then that by it guiding and teaching
vs, we may iearnc to craue all good things at his hand , & to accompc
them receiued of him . For how can any thought ofGod enter into
thy mind , but that thou muR therwithall byandby thinke , thatfor-
afmuch as thou art his creature, therfore thou art of right fubiedand
bound to his authoiitie, that thou owcft him thy lifejthat whatfocuer
thou entcrprifeftjwhatfocuer thou doeft, ought to be direded to him?
If this be true , then truely it foloweth that thy life is pcruerfely cor-
rupted if it be not framed to obeying of him , forafmuch as his will
ought to be our law to hue by. Agayn, thou canft not cleerely fee
him , but that thou muft necdes know that he is the fountain and ori-
^ioall of all good things , wherevpon (hould grow both a defire to
clcaue vnto him, and anaffured truii m him,if mans owne corruprncs
didnotdrawehis mindefrom the right fearchingof him . Fortitftof
all, the godly minde doth not as by a dreamt imagine to her Cdk any
God at aduenture , but ItedfalHy beholdeth the onely one and true
God : and doth not faliely forge of ium whatfoeuer her felfe liketh,
but is content to belcuuc ium to be fuch a one as he difclofeth him-
(elfe, and doth alway with greaie diligence beware that with prefump*
tuous raOincflTe fhe paiTe not beyond his wil, andfo wander out of the
way. And when Oie fo knoweta him, becaufe flie vnderftanderh that
he gouerncth nil thingcs , fhe alfuredly trufteth that he is her fafe-
keeper and deft-nder, and therefore whoFely committcth her felfe to
his fayth ? Bccaufc ihe vnderllandeth that he is the author of all good
things, therefore if any thing trouble her , or if (hce want any thing,
byandby (he flyeth to him for fuccour,looking for helpe at his hand.
Becaufe fhee is pcifwaded that he is good and mercifull, therefore
with aflbred confidence (hce reftcth on him , and doubteth not in all
her euills to finde readie remedy in his mercifull kindnelTe . Beceaufe
fhee knoweth him to be her Lord and father , therefore fhce dcter-
jnineth that he i§ worthy that fhee (hould in ^ thingeshaue regard
A iij.
Cap.2. Of the knowledge of
to his authoritic, rcuercncc his maieltic, procure the aduauncement
of his glorie,and obey his commaundements. Becaufe fhee Teeth that
he IS a ryghteous ludge, & armed with his fcuentic to punifh (inncrs,
therefore fhe alway Ictteth his iudgement feare before her eyes, and
with fearcof him withdraweth & rcftrayneth her fclfcfrom prouo-
king his wrarh.Yct is (lie not fo afraide with the fechng of his iudge-
ment , that lliee would conuey her felfc ffom it , although there were
a way open to efcapeit: but rather fliee doth nolclVe loue him,whylc
he extenJcth vengeance vpon the wicked, than while he is bcneficuil
to the 5;odly, forafmuch as llic vnderlladcth thnt it doth no lelle be-
loHi^ to his glory that he hath in (lore puni(hmcnt for the wicked and
cuill doers.than that he hath reward ofercriial lire for the righteous.
Morcouer Hieedoih not foroncly feaic of puniihmentrcfraine her
CAU: from (inning : but becaufe (liec loutth and reucrenceth him a$
hei father,attendeth on him and honorcth him as her Lordjthercforc
although there were no hell at alljyetlhee dreadcth his only di'plea-
fure. Nowe behold wliat is the pure and true rcligion,eucn faith ioy-
ncd with an earncft feare of God : fo that fcarc may contayneinita
willmg reuerence , and drawe with it a right forme of worlhipping
fuch 2S is appointed in thelawe. And this is the more hecdfully to be
noted,hecaufc all men generally do worfliip God, but fewe doe reue-
rence him, while cch where is great pompous flicwe in Ceremonies,
but the purenes of hart is rare to be found.
J Truely,they that iudgc rightly,wjll alway hold this for ccrtaine,
that there is grauen in the mindes of men a ccrtaine feeling of the
Godhead, which neucr can be blotted out. Yea that this periwafion,
that there is a God, is eucn from their generation naturally planted in
them, and dccpcly rooted within their bones, the very obltinacie of
the wicked is afubftinti3ll\vitncire,which with their furious ftriuing
yet can neuer wmdc themfduesoutoftiie feare of God . Althoughc
D/V;^or^f and fuch other doe icfl and Inugh at all that hath in all.igcs
bene belceued concerning religion: although Dyon/fiuf doc feoff c at
the heaucnly iudgcmet: yet that is but a laughter from the teeth for-
ward, becaufe inwardly the worme ofconfciencc gnaweth the much
more fliarpely than all hot fearing irons. I allonge not this that Cicero
(ayihjthat errors by continuance of time growe out of vfc,& religion
daily more and more cncrcafeth and waxeth better . For the woildc
(as a litie hereafter we (\u\\ haue occafion to niew)trauailcth as much
as in it iicth to fliake of .->ll knowledge of God , and by all meanes to
corrupt the worfhipping of him But this only I fay, that whc the dull
iurdncsjwhich the wicked doc dcHroufly labor to get io dcfpifcGod
with-
God the Creator. Lib.i. 4
withall, doth lie piningly in their harts, yet the fame feeling of God,
which they woulde moft ofall dcfire to hauc vttcrly deftroyed, liueth
ftill,and fometimc doth vtter it lelfe : whereby we gather that it is no
fuch dodrine as is firlt to be learned in fchooIes,but fuch a one whcr-
of euery man is a teacher to himfelfe euen from his mothers womb,
& fuch a one as nature fuffreth none to forger, although many bend
ail their endcuoure to fliake it out of their minde. NoWjif all men be
borne & do liue to this end, to know God, & the knowledge of God
is but fickle and lightly vanifhcth awayjVnleflc it proccede thus farre:
ic is euident, that they all fwarue out of kinde from the lawe of theyr
creation, that doe not dired to this marke all the whole thoughts &
doings of their life. Of which the Philofophers themfelues were not
ignorant . For Vlato ment nothing clfe, when he oftentimes taught,
that the foucraign good o^ the foulc is the likenefle of God , when J^^^J'
the foule hauing throughly coceiued the knowledge of him is whole- & thec-
ly transformed into him. Therefore very aptly doth Gri/Ius reafon in ccro.
TlutarchcyV/hQTC he affirmethjthatmen, if religion be once taken fro
their life,are not only nothing better than brure beafts,but alfomany
waies much more miferable,for that being fubied to fo many forts of
ciiils they continually draw forth a troublefome vnquiet life:and that
thcrfore the worfhipping of God is the only thing that maketh them
better than brute beaftes,by which alone they afpire to immortality.
The iij. Chapter.
That the knowledge of God u naturally planted in the mindes of men,
WEholditoutofcontrouerfie , that there is in the mind
of man , euen by naiurall inftindion , a certaine feeling
of the Godhead . Fortothecnde that nomanfhould
flee to the pretence of ignorace,God himfelfc hath plan-
ted in all men a certaine vnderftanding of his diuine maieftie : the re-
membrance whereof, with powring in now and then as it were ncWt
droppes, he continually renewerh : that when all, not one excepted,
do know that there is a God , and that he is their maker , they may all
be condemned by their ownc teftimonie, for that they haue not both
worshipped him,and dedicate their life to his wiU.But rruely if the not
knowing of God be any where to be found , it is likely that there can
no where elfe be any example of it more tha among the groflell forts
of peoples and furtheft from ciuill order of humanirie . But ( as the ^.
heathen man fayeth) there is no nation fo barbarous,no kinde of peo- j * naf^
pie {o fauagc,in whom refteth not this perfuafion that there is a God. Deoru'.
And cucn they that in other parts of their life feeme very htle to diflPcr
' A iiij.
Cap. 3 . Of the knowledge of
from brute beafteSjyct do cont'iiually kccpc a ccriainc feedc of Reli-
gion . So throughly hath this common principle pollcfl'eci all mens
mmdes , and fo faft it ftickcth vvuhin all mens bowels. Sith then frdm
the beginning of thewoild there hatn bin no councrcy, no Citie,
yea no houfe,ihat could be without religion,in this is cmphed a cer-
taine fccrct confedion that a feeling of the Godhead is written in the
hearts of all men . Yea and idolatric it fclfe is a fubftamiall proofc of
this pcrfuafion. For we know how vnwillingly man abafcth him felfe
to honor other creatures aboue himfeltc. Therefore when he had ra-
ther worfhip a block and a ftonc , than he would be thought to haue'
no Godjit appearetli that this imprinted perluaiion of God is ofmoft
great force, which is impoflible to be raced out of the mind of man,
that it is much more ealic to hauc the uftcdi5 of niture brokcp> as in
deede it is broken whc ma trom his own natural fwellini^ pride of his
own will ftoupeth downe euen ro the bafeft creatures to honor God.
z Wherfore it is moft vayne which fome doe fay,that religion was
deuifcd by the futteltie and craft of a few, by this policie 19 keepe the
fimple people in awe > whereas they them fclues that procured other
to worfhip God , belecucd nothing lefie than that there was any God
at all. I graunt in deede that futtle men hauc inusntcd many things in
rehgion,whereby to bring the people to a reutrcce,and caft them in a
fcarCjto make their minds the more pliable to obediece: But this they
could neuer hauc brought to pafle , vnles tlic mindcs ofmen had bin
already before hand perfwaded that there was a God , out of which
perfuafion as out of lecdc fpringcth that ready incimatio to religion.
Neither is it Ukly that eue they which iurtelly deceiued the fimplc fort
with colour of religion, were them feluesaltogethcr without know-
ledge of God. For though in times part there haue bene fomc, and at
this day there arifevp many, thit denie that there is any God: yet
whether they will or no,they oftentimes fetle that which they are de-
firous not to know. We readc of none thateuer did breake forth into
more prefumptuous and vnbndled de(p»fing of God , than Caius L a-
ligula: yet none more miferably trembled when any token of Gods
wrath appeared. And fo agayiiUc his will he cjuakcd for fcare of him
whom of wilfull purpofc he cndcuorcd to defpife. And the fame may
a man commonly fee to happen to fuch as he was. For the bolder de-
fpifcrof God that any man is, the more is he troubled at the very
noyfc of the falling of a Icafc. And whence commeth that , but from
the rcuenccment of Gods maieftic , which doth fo much tKc more
vehemently flrike their confciences as they more labor to flic away
from it? They do in dccdclooke about for all the Ihrting holes that
may
God the Creator. Lib.r. 5
may be,to hide them fcluts from the prefencc of the Lord : but whe-
ther they will or no , they are ftill holder) faft tycd . For howloeuer
(bmetime it feemcth to vanifh away for a moment,yct it oft recurneth
againe , and with new aflaulc doth runne vpon them : (o that the reft
which they haue,if they haue any at all, from torment of confciencc,
is much like to the (lecpc of drunkards or frantikemen, which cuen
while they flcepe do not quietly rett,becaure they are at euery momet
vexed with horrible and dreadfull dreames . Therefore the veryyu-
godly themfelues ferue for an example to proue that there aiway ly-
ueth in all mens mindcs Tome knowledge of God. ^
The iiij. Chapter*
That thtpvne kpovvUdge it cjthcr choked^ or corrupted^ partly by
i^nora'2cey and partly by malice,
BVt as experience teacheth that God hath fowcn the Cecdc of
religion in all men,ro fcarcely may be founde the hundreth ma,
that hauing it conceyued in his heart doth cherifh itjbut no ma
in whom it ripeneth > fo far is it of that any frute appearcth in
due time . Therefore whether it be that feme become vaine in theyr
owne fuperftitions, or that fome do offer purpofe mahcioufly reuolt
from God, yet all doe runne out of kmd from the true knowledge of
him. So commethit to pafle that there rcmameth no true godlmellc
in the worlde. But whereas 1 fayd that fome by error fall into fuper-
ftition, I mcaae not thereby as though their fimplicity might excufc
them from blame, bccaufethe bhndnefi'c that thcyhaue, is com-
monly alway mingled both with proud vanity, & with ftubborneflc.
Vanity and the fame ioyned with pnde appeareth in this , that they
mifer^le men both in the feeking of God do not chmbe aboue the-
felues as they ought to haue done, but meafurc him according to the
proportion of their owne ft efhly dulnefle, and alfo neglcdmg the
found manner of fearching for him, do curioufly fly tovayne fpecu-
lations. And fo they conceiue him not fuch a one as he oftreth him-
felfe, but do imagine hmi fiich a one as of their owne rafhe prefump-
tion they haue forged him . Winch gulfe beingi){ice opened, what
way foeuer they ftirre their feete,they muft needeiajway run hedlong
into deftrudion . For whatfoeucr afterward they goc about toward
the worshipping or feruice of God, they can not accompt it done to
him,becaufe they wotfliip not him, but rather the deuife of their own
heart, & their owne dreame in fteade of him . This peruerfncs doth
Taule expreffely touche, where he fayth, that they were made foolcs Ro™'«»
when they coueted to be wife . He had before fayd , that ihey were ***
I_ap.4. ^-'t the knowledge ot
made vainc in their imaginauons : but Icait any man (liould thereby
cxcufc them from blame , hcaddcthfurrher, thatthey are worthily
bhnded bccaufc not contented with fobrietie.but prefiimptuoudy ta-
king vpon themfcluesmorc than they ought, they wilfully bung
daikntflc vpon them, yea with vaine & froward pride do make them-
fclues fooles.Wherupo followeth,that their foolilhnes is not excufa-
blc,wherof the caufe is not only vame curiofity.but ahb a gredines to
knowe more than is meete (or them,ioyned with a i'oXic confidence.
z As for this that Daitid fayth , that the wicked & mad mc thinkc
Pfa ^ ^" ^^^^'^ heartSjthat there is no GodrFirft that is meant only ot iholc^
,, ^ that choking the hghc of nature, doof purpofe make themfelucs
fcnfeleflc, as we fhall fee againe a htle hereafter . Eucn as we fee that
many after that they haue bin hardened with boldcnefleand cu-
ftome of linningjdo furioufly put from them all the remembrance of
God which yet is by very feeling of nature inwardly miniltrcd vnto
their mindes. 'NowcDauidj to make their madnes the more detefta-
ble , bringcththcm in as though theyprecifely denied, that there
is any God : ahhough they take not from him his being, but becaufc
in taking from him his iudgcmcnt andprouidence, they fliut him
vp idle in heauen. For whereas nothing les agrccth with the nature of
God, than to throw away the goucrnemeni of the world , and leauc
it to fortunCjto winke at the finnes of men , fo as they may hue in li-
centious outrage vnpuniflied : whofoeucr he be that quenching the
feare of the heauenly iudgcmcnt,doth carclcfly folow his owne atfcc-
tionSjhc denieih that there is a God. And this is the iuft vengeance of
God, to draw a fatncs ouer their hartesjfb that the wicked when they
haue once clofed their eyes, eucn in feeing may not fee . And Dauid
Pfa. JO. in an other place is the bcft expounder of his owne meaning , where
6.t. he fayeih:That the feare of God is not before the eyes of the wicked:
Pfa. 10. Again, that in their cuill doinges they proudly rcioyce at them felues,
**• becaufc they pcrfuade thcmfclucs,thatGod doth not lokc vpon them.
7 herfore although they be compelled to acknowledge feme God,yet
they do rob him of his gloiie,in withdrawing fro him his power. For
a.Tiai.i as God (as T aule \snnci\cih) cannoi dcnic himfclfcjbccaufe he con-
>J. tinually abidcth likehimfclfe: foisit truely fayd , that thefemenin
faining God to be a dead and vainc image doe dcnic God. Moreouer
it is to be noted that although they wralUe againft their own natural!
feeling, anddodefiienotonely tofliakeout God from thence, but
alfo to dcftroy him in heaucnryc t tiicir dull hardnes can ncucr fo farre
preuailc, but that God fomciimedrawctli them bncke to his iudgc-
mcturcac. But forafmuchas ihcy arc not withholdcn with any fear
from
God the Creator. Lib.i, 6
from running violently againrt God:th€rcfore it is ccrtaine that there
riiigneth in them a brutifh forgctfulnes of God, fo long as that bhnd
pang of rage doth fo forciblie carie them.
I Soisthatvaincdefenfe ouerthrowne , which manic are wont
to pretende for excufe of their fuperrtirion. For they thinkc , that any
dcuotion to rehgion fuffifcth, whatfoeuerxt hc,rhough it be ncuer fo ..
much contrarie to order and truth . But they conlidcr not , that true
religion ought to be framed accot dmg to the wjU of Godjas by a per-
petuailrulcand that God himfeife abideih alway hkc himfelfe,and is
no imagined Ghoft or fanta{]e,that maie be diuerfly falhioned after e-
uery manncs liking. Andtruelywc may plainly lee with how lying
decf ites fuperftition mocketh God , while (lie goeth about to do him
pleaturc. For catching holde of thofc thingesin a manner only,which
God IkuIi tcftifivd that he careth not for, fhe eyther contcmptuoufly
vfeth, or openly refufeth thofe things that he appoyateth and fayech
to be plcafant vnto him. Therfore whofoeuer do fee vp new inuenced
formts of worfliippingGodjthcy worlhip & honor their own doting
deuifcs; becaufe they durft not !b trifle with God , vnles they had firft
foyned aOod agreeing with the follies of the trifeUng toyes. Where-
fore the A poftle pronounccthjthat that vnftayed and wandering opi-
nion of the maielhe of God , is a very not knowing of God . When
( fayeth hc)ye knewc not Godjye fcrued them that m nature were no Ga.4,9«
gods. And m an other place he fayeth that the Ephelians were without
a God 3t fuch time as they ftrayed from the right knowledge of the Ep.a.»>
one God. And at leait in this cafcjit ditlcrcth not much,whether thou
beleue one God or many , becaufe in both cafes thou departeft from
& forfakeft the irueGod:whom whe thou haft once forfaken,there is
nothing left with thee but a deteftable Idol. It foloweth therforc,that
we muft determine with Ladantius, that there is no lawfully allowa-
ble religion,but that which is ioyned with truth.
4 There is alfb a fecond fault , that they neyther haue at any time
any confideration of Godjbut againft their wills, nor do approche to*
ward him , till for all their holding backe they be forcibly drawcn to
him: and euen then alfo they haue not a willing feaie that procecdcth
from reucrence of Gods maicftie,but oncly a feruile and conftrayncd
feare , which theiudgcment of God wringeth out of them : which
judgement becaufe they can not efcape, therfore they dread it,but yet
fo as therwithall they abhorre it . And fo that faying of Statius, that
feare firft made gods in the worldjmay be fitly fpoken of vngodlinefte,
and of this kindc of vngodlines onely.They that haue a mindc abhor-
ring from the iuftice of God, do hartily wifti to haue his throne of
i^ap. 4. Ui tne knowledge or
iudgcment oucrthrowcn,which they know to Ihnd for puniftiment of
offences agaynftjhis luftice by which affedio they warre againft God,
who can not be without his iudgement. But when they vnderftand that
his power impoffible to be auoyded,hangethouer them, bccaufe they
can neythcr by force remoue it, nor by flight efcape it, therefore they
fearc it So Icaft they fhould in all things feeme to defpife him, whofc
maicftie ftill prefTeth vpon them, they vfe a certainc outward forme of
rchgion » fuch as it is : but in the meane tyme they ceafc not to dcHle
them felues with all kinde of vices , to loy ne outragious mifcheues to
mifcheues, vntill they hauc in all pomces violate the holy lawe o f the
Lord, and dcftroycd his whole ryghteoufnefle or at leaft they are not
fo holden backe with that fayned feare of God , but that they fwetely
rert in their 6nnes,and flatter them(clues,and had rather to folow the
intcmpcrace of their flcfh than reftrainc it with the bridle of the holy
Ghoft. But forafmuch as the fame is but a voyde and lying fhadowe of
rcligion,yea fcarcely worthy to be called a (liadow : hereby againe is
eafily gathered howe much the true godlmes, which is powred onely
into the heartes of the faithfull , I meane that out of which rehgion
fprin^^eth, doth differ from this confufc knowledge of God . And yet
the liypocrites would obtainc by crooked compafTcs to feeme nygh
vmo God , whom they flye from. For whereas there ought to haue
bin one conimuall vnbroken courfe of obedience in their whole hfc,
they in a maner in all their doingcs careleflely rebelling againll him,
labour with a fewe facrifices to appeafe him . Whereas they ought to
hauc ferued him with holmes of life and fincerencfle of heart,they in-
uent triflmgs and obleruices of no valuejto procure his fauour with-
all : yea they do the more hcentioufly lye dull in their owne drcggs,
becaufe they truft that they may be difcharged againrt him with their
owne mockeries of propiciatory fatisfadions. Finally whereas their
«ffiaunceou[;ht to hauc bin faftencd in him , they negledinghim do
reft in thcmfclucs,or in creatures. At length they entangle thcmfclues
with fuch a heapc of crrors,that the darke mill of mahce doth choke,
and at laft vtterly quench thofc fparkes , that glimmeringly lliined to
make them fee the glory of God. Yet that feede ftill rcmaincth which
can by no meane be plucked vp by the rootc , to bclcue that there is
a certainc godhead : out the fame feede is fo corrupted , that it brin-
geth forth of it none other but very euill frutes . Yea iherby is that
which I trauailc to proue more certainly gathered , that there is a fee-
hng of ^odhc.id naturally grauen in the heartes of men , forafmuch as
the very reprobate thcmfclues arc of nccelVity enforced to confcfle it.
In quiet profpcntic tliey pleafandy mockc at God^yea tlicy arc full of
talkc
God the Creator. Lib.i. 7
talke and prating to diminifh the grcatncfTc of his power : but if once
any defperation touche the,it ftirrcth them vp to fceke the fame Gods
and miniftrcth them fodaine fhort prayers : by which it may appeare,
that they were not vtterly ignorant of God , but that the fame which
ought fooner to hauc bene vttered^was by obihnacie fuppi eilcd.
The fifth Chapter,
That the knowledge of God doth fhitiingly appeare in the making of the
world and m the contmnall getttrnemtnt thereof.
MOrcouer bccaufe thefurtheft endeof blefled hfe ftandeth
in the knowledge of God : that the way to felicitie fhould
be flopped to non*, thcrfore God hath not only planted lo
the mmds of men that fccde of religion which we hauc fpo-
ken ofjbut alfo hath fo difclofed himfelfe in the whole workemanihip
of the world , and daily fo manifeiUy prefentct'i himfelfe , that men
can not open their eyes but they muft needs behold him. His fubftacc
in decde is incomprehenfible,fo that his diuine maieftie farrc furmoii-
teth all mens fenfes:but he hath in all his works grauen certaine marks
of his gloric, and thofe fo plaine and notably difcernable,t!iat the ex-
cufe of ignorance is taken away from me,be they neuer fo grofle and
dull witted . Therefore the Prophet rightfully crieth out, that he is
clothed with light as with a garmentras if he (hould haue fayd , that **'°^
then he firft began to come forth to be feene in vifible apparel , fincc
the time that he firft difplaied his enfignes in the creatio of the world,
by which euen now what way foeuer we tume our eies,hc appeareth
glorious vnio vs.In the fame place alfo the fame Prophet aptly com-
pareth the heauens as they be difplaied abrod, to his toy all pauillion:
he fayththathe hath framed his parlours in the waters, that ycloudes ,
are his chariots,that he rideth vpon the wings of the windes, that the
winds and lightnings are his fwift meflengers. And becaufc the glory
of his power and wifdom doth more fully fliine aboue, therefore
commonly the heaucn is called his pallace . And firft of all, what way
foeuer thou turne thy eytSjthere is no peece of the world be it neuer
fo fmall , wherein are not feene at leaft fome fparklcs of his glory to
fhine. But as for this moft large and beutifuli frame, thou canft not
with one viewe perufe the wide compafl'e of it , but that thou muft
needs be on euery fide ouerwhelmed with the infinite force of the
brightncsthereof Wherefore the author of the Epiftle to ihc Hebrues ^^ ^^
doth very well call the ages of the worlde the fpedaclc of inuifiblc
thinges/or that the fo orderly framing of the worlde ferueth vs for a
mirror wherein we may behold God which otherwifc is inuifiblc.
Cap. 5. Of the knowledge ot
For which caufc the Prophet alligncth to the heaucniy creatures a
language that all nations vnderitand , for that in them there is a more
j^ euidencteftiHcationofthe Godhead, than that icought to cfcape the
conddcration of any nnnon bcchcy neuer fodull . Which thing the
lo.i.i5 Apoftlc declaring n.orc plainly fayih that there is difdofed vnto men
Co much as was bchouefull to be knowen concerning God : becaufc
;ill men without exception, do throughly fee his inuifiblc things tucn
to his very power and Godhead, which they vnderfland by the crea-
tion of the woild.
2 As forhis wondeifull wifdom, there are innumerable proues
bo:h in heauen and in earth that witncflc it:I meane not only that fe-
creter fort of thinges, for the nercr marking whereof Jjhro^o<Tie,Thi-
fik^ , and all naiurall Philofophie feructh , but ^nzix ih'ilc things that
thruft them felues in fight of cuerie one,eucn of the rudcft vnlearned
man,fo that men can not open their eyes but they muft needs be wit-
nelfes of them. But trucly they that haue digcfted,yea or but tafted the
liberall arts> bcm^ holpcnby the ayd thereof do proceedc much fur-
ther to looke into the Iccrets of Gods wifdom . Yet is there no man
To hindred by lacke of knowledge of thofe arts, but that he throughly
feeth aboundantly enough of conning workcmanlliip in Gods works,
to bring him in admiration of the workcman thereof. As for example:
to the fearching out of the mouings of the ihrres, appointing of their
piaccs,meafuring of their diftanccs, & noting of their propcrties,therc
needcth art and an cx.tdtr diligence : by which being throughly per-
ceiucd,as the prouidcnce of God is the more manifcftly difdofed/o it
is conucnientj that the mind rife fomewhat the hier thereby to be-
hold his glory . But foralmuch as the vnlearned people, yea and the
rudcft fortofthem,fuchas are furniflied with the only helpe of iheyr
eyes, can not be ignorant of the exccUencie of Gods cunning workc-
manfhip, which in this innumerable and yet fo fcuerally well ordered
and difpofed variety doeh of it fdfc fliewc forth ic fdfc : it is euident
that there is no man to whom God doth not largely open his wif-
In libr. <ioni . Likewife it requircth a lingular fliarpenes of wit , to wcy with
dc vfu fuch cunning as Calcn doth,f he knicting toget!ier,fhc propornonall
pjrt. agrecmentjthe beautie, and vfc in the frame of mans body:but by all
mens confeihon, the body of man doth vttcr in very fliewe of it (elfc
fb cunmg a compacting together, that for it the maker of it may wor-
thily be ludgcd wonderfuU.
5 And therefore ccrtainc of the Philofopheris in olde time did not
without caufecallmanalirlc world, becaufc he is a rare reprefentation
of the powcr,goodntire, and wifdom of God, and contcineth in him
fdfc
God the Creator, Lib.i. o
fclfe miracles enoweto occupic our mindes, if we will be content to
marke ihcm. And for this rcafon Vauly after that he had fayd that the Ad. 17.
very bhnd men may find out God by groping for him, byandby fayih ^7«
further, that he is not to be fought farre of, becaufe all men do feclc
vndoutedly within themfelues ihc heauenly grace wherewith they be
quickncd. But if we ncede to go no further than ourfcIues,to finde and
take hold of God: what pardon fhall his floiuhfulncs deferuc that will
not vouchfafe to defcend into himfelfe to finde God? And the fame is
the reafon why Dauidy when he had rtiortly fpoken in the aduance-
mcnt of the wonderfull name & honor of God that do euery where pra,8.|
glorioufly (hincbyandby crieth outrWhar is man that thou art mind'
full of him ? A game, out of the mouth of infantes and fucking babes
thou haft ftabhfhed ftrength.For (o he pronounccth that not only in
the whole kinde of man js a mirror of the workes of God , but alfo
that the very infantes , while they yet hang on their mothers brcftes,
haue tongues eloquent enough to preache his glory , fo that there
nedeth no other orators . And therefore he douteth not to fet their
mouthes inthe vauwarde, as being ftrongly armed to fubdue their
madnelTc that would according to their deuilifli pride couet to extin-
guifli the name of God. And hervpon rifeth that which P<»</ allegeth ^^^ ,y.^
out o( yirat Hs,that wc are the ofTpring of God ; becaufe he garnifliing »8.
vs with fuch excellencie,hath teftified that he is our father.Like as eue
by comon reafonj& as it were by information of experience,thc pro-
phane Peers called him the father of men. And truly no ma will aflen-
tingly and willingly yeelde him ftlfeto ferue God, but he thathauing
talted his fatherly loue,is mutually allured to loue and worfhip him.
4 And here is difclofed the foule vnthankfulncfTe of men , which
while they haue within them felues a workehoufe glorioufly furnifhed
with innumerable workes of God , and alfo a (hop ftuffed with incfti-
mable plentie of riches,and whe they ought to burft forth into pray-
(ing of him,are contrariwife puffed vp and doe fwell with fo much the
greater pride. They feele how diuerfly in maruelous wife God wor-
keth in ihcmithey are taught by experience itfelfe,how great variety
of gifts they poflelTe by his liberalitie : whether they will or no , they
are enforced to knowe that thefe are the tokens of his godhead: and
yet they fupprefle it dofe within them. Truely they ncde not to goc
out cf them felues , fo that they would not in prefumptuoufly taking
vpon them felues that which is giuen from heauen, bury within the
ground that which brightly giueth light to their minds to fee God.
But euen at this day the earth beareth many mofterous fpirite?,which
ilicke not 10 abufe the whole fccde of Godhead that is fowen in mas
C jp. 5. Of the knovvlcdgc of
n.iturcj.ind to cmploic it to opprcUe the name of God. How detcfta-
bicl prjv yoUjisthismadncs, that man tindm^ God a hundred times
in his body and Ins ibuic , (hould by the very lame pretence of excel-
lence deny that there is a God ? Thcv will not lay , that they are by
chauncc made dirfcrcnt from brute bcaih But they pretend a dokcof
nature , whom thev accompt the maker ot all chings,and lodo con-
uey Godawav.l hey Ice that cxquiluc workmalhip mall their mem«
bvTS, trom their n-.outh and their eyes eucn to thenailcs otilieir
roacs,and yet here alio they pur nature in place of God. But fpccially
the fo fwift motions, the fo excellent powers, the fo rare s:ifts of the
foalc , do rcprclent a diumc nature that doth not ealily mrt'cr it felfc
to be hid : vnlelle the Epicureans h!se the Giauntcs Cyclopes would
bearing tlicm R^s bold vpon this hie decree outrageoully make
Hjrre againll God . Do the wliole treafures or the heaucnly wildom
io mecte together , to rule a worme of Hue feete lone : and ihall the
whole viuuerlaliiicof the wotldbc without this prcrogatiuc ? Firit
to ai;i ee that there is a ccrtame inlhumcnial thini^ that aunhvcreih to
all the parts ot man , doth fo fcruc nothing at all to obfcure the ho-
nour or God, that it rather doth more s:lorioully fet it out . Let Epi-
cure aunfwcrc mc , whar meeiin^of vndiuifiblc bodies , boiling ihc
n>eat and drmke in man, doth difpofe part into excrements and part
into blood, and bnnocih to palFc that there is in all the members of
man luc!^ an endcuoiin^ to do their orfice.euen as it fo many feuerall
foiilcs did bv common aduife rule one bodie.
5 But I hauc not nowe to do with that ilic of fwincj rather fpeake
vntoihcm , that bcm - . . ucn to futtcltics would by croked conucy-
ance wryth that cold of ytnfhile , both todcllroy the immor-
talitie of the foulc, and alio to take fiom God lus right. For becaufe
there a re inltrumcniall powers of the foule,by pretence thereof they
bmd the foulc to the body, that it can not continue witr.out the body
& w ith pravfes of nature they do as much as in ihem is, fupprclle the
name ot God . But '•he powers ot the toule are farrc t\ om being cn-
cloied 111 thofe CKcrcilcs that lerue the booy.bor what pcrtamcth it to
t^c body,tor a man to mcaiure the f kie, to ^zither the number of the
U .res , to learne the grcamctfc of one , to kiow w hat fpace they be
diitant one from an other , wirh what IwiftneUc or llownelle they go
their courtes, how many degrees they decline this wav or that way ?
I i^raunt m deed that there is fome vfe of Allrologie:but mv meaning
IS onclv to ihew that in this fo depe fearching out of heauenly things,
it IS not an iniVumcntal meafuring.but that the foule hath her oftices
by it felf I'cuerali fro the body. I hauc ihcwcd one example, bv which
It Ihalbe
God the Creator. Lib.r. 9
it fiialbe cafic for the rentiers to gather the rcil. Trucly the mnnifold
nimblcncHc of the foiilcjby which it (lirucicth both hcaucn & earth,
ioyncth things pall with things to come , kcpeth in niemoric things
heard long before, and cxprclleth cch thing to it felfby imaginarion,
alfo the in^cnioufncs by which it iniietcth things incredible,& which
is the mother of fo many marueloiis arts , are lUrc tokens of diiunc
nature in man.Btlide that,cucn in flceping it doth nor oncJy roll and
turne it fclfc, but alfoconceiucth many thinges prohtablc, reafoncth
of many thinges,andalfoprophcciethof thingcs tocoine.What flial
wc in this cafe fay , but that the figncs of immortalitic that arc em-
printed in man, can not be blotted out? Now what rcafon may bcarc
that man flialbc of diuinc nature , and not acltnowlcd^c his Crcaion
Shall wc forfoth by iudgemtnt that is put into vscluccrnc betweene
right and wrong,andfliall there bcnoiudgcin he3urn?Shall wecucn
in our fleepe haue abiding with vs fome remnant of vnder{tanding,&
fhall no God be waking in goucrning the vvoild ? Shall wc be fo tom-
ptcd the inuentcrs of fo many artes and profitable things , that God
ihalbc defrauded of his praife, whereas yet experience fufficicnrly tca-
chcih.that from an other and not from our fclucs, all that wc haue , is
in diucrfe wife diftributed amosj vs? As for that, which fomc do babble
ofthefecrct infpiration thatgeiiethhuclmcs to the worId,itis not only
wcakc,but alfo vngodly.They like well that famous faying! of Vcrgilt;
Firfi hcauen and earth, and flowing fields of feat, •
The jhimng^lobe of Moone, and Titans fiars, Acn.4,
Sfirite feedes within, and throughout all the lirm^
Jnfufcd minde the whole huge majfe doth moue,
jind with the large bigge bodie mixe it felfe.
Thence come the l^indes of men and e\(^ of beafls,
jind lines of flying foules, and monflers fiYange»
That water beares within the marble Sea.
ji firye liuelineffe and heauenlie race there is
Within th ofe fedes. <fyic.
Forfoth , that the world which was created f^r a fpedacle of the
glorie of God, Oiould be the creator of it fclfc So in an other place
the fame author folowing the common op«*"on oi the Greeks and
Latins, faycth-
Some fay that bees haue parte ofmin-tc diuine^ q^^
jind heaucnly draughts. For eie t''cy fay that God
Gothe through the coafis of lar-^i^^nd creeks offea^
jind through depe slne.ylnd hence the ftoci^s andherdes:
^ndmen^andallthe kjndit offauage beajis.
Cap. 5- Ur mc knowledge ot
£ch at their birth re due tiieirftittlc Hues.
Jnd therto are they rendered all at lajl^
^nd all refoluedare retownd againe.
7^ place there is for death:bnt litieCy they,
Tlie into nombcr of the fiarrcs abcuc^
^nd tal{e theyr place within the lofty sf{ie.
Loe, what tliac hungry fpeculacio of die vniucrfall mind? thatgc-
ucth loule and liuclinclfe to the world,auailcch to engender & nourifh
Godlincs in the harts of mcn.Which dotli alfo better appeare by the
blafphcmous fhyings of the filthy dogge Lucrctius,wliich are deriucd
from the fame principle. Euen this is it, to make a fliadowilh God, to
dnuc farre away the true God whom wc ought to feare & worlliip.
I grajjt in decde that this may be godhly (ayd,to that it procecde from
a godly raindc, tliat Nature is God : but becaufc it is a hard & an vn-
propcr rnaner of fpech , forafmuch as Nature is rather an order pre-
fer! bed by God : therefore in things of fo great weight and to which
is due a fingular religioufnelTe , it is hurtful! to wrap vp God confufe-
ly with the inferior courfe of his works. Let vs therefore remember,
foofc as anymanconfidercthhis ownc naturejthat there is one God
which fo gouemeth all naturcs,that his will is to haue vs to lookc vn-
to himjour faith to be direded to him, and him to be worfliippcd and
called vppon of vs:becaufe there is nothing more againft conueniece
of reafon than for vs toenioy thofc excellcc gifts that fauour of diuinc
nature in vs,and to dcfpifc the author that freely doth geue them vnto
\% : Now as concerning his power, with how notable examples doth
it hrceable draw vs to confider it vnlcfife perhapps we may be igno-
rant > of how great a ftrengih it is with his only word to vphold this
infiiuternaflc of heaucn and earth , with his only beck, fometimc to
fliakc the Vcaucn with noife of thunders, to burnc vp cch thing with
lightnings , *o fet the aire on ficr with lightning flames, fometime to
trouble it withdiucrs forts of tcmpefts , and byandby the fame God
whc he lifl: in one moment to make fairc wether: to hold in the Sea as
jMt hanged in the 'mxc , which with his hcighth fecmcth to threaten
CGntinuall dcftrudion to the earth, fometimc in horrible wife to raife
it vp with outragious violence of winds, and fometimc to nppeafe the
w jucs & make it calme ago»n. For pi otc hercot'do fcruc all the praifcs
of God gathered of ihcicfii-^ionies ot nature, fpecially in ihe bookc
o[ fob & in Efay, winch novvo*:"purpofc 1 oucrpallc,bccaufe they (hal
els where haue nn other place fitCvr for thcm,wjicre I ihnll entreat of
the creation of the woiKi accoiiiinj^ro the Scriptures. Only my mea-
ning v/asnowio touch, that boihlhar.^cis & they of thchoufchold
of
God the Creator. Lib.i. lo
of God haue this way of fetking God common to them both,tIut is,
CO follow thcfefirft draughts which both aboite and bencthdoas
in a Ihadow fet forth a hucly image of him . And now the fame po-
wer Icadeth vs to confider his etcrnitie . For it muft needs be that he
from whom all things haue their beginning, is of cternali contmu-
ance,and hath his beginning,of himfclfc. But now if any man enc^uirc
the caufe whereby he both was once lead to create all thefc things, &
is now moued to preferuc them: we fhall finde that his only goodncs
was it that caufed him . Yea and although this only be the caufe, yet
ought the fame aboundantly to fuffice ro allure vs to iheloue olhim,
forafmuch as there is no creature (as the Prophet faych) vpon which Pf^., . ^^
his mercy is not poured out. • i>.
6 Alfo m the fccond Ibrt of his works , I meane thofc that come
to pafle belide the ordinary courfc of nature 5 there doth appeare no
Icfle euidcnt proofe of his powers. For in gouerning the fellowlhip of
men he fo orderech his prouidence,thac whcras he is by innumerable
means good and boumifuil to all men , yet by manifcit and daily to-
kens he dcclareth his fauorable kindneflc to the Godlyioand his feue-
rity to the wicked and euell doers . For not doutfull are the puniili-
ments that he layeth vpon haynous offences : hkc as he doth openly
fhew himfelfe a defendor and reuenger of innoccncie> while he pro-
fpcreth the life of good men with his bleflingjhelpeth their necelTuy,
aflwageth and comforteth their forowes, relicueth their calamities,
and by all meanes prouideth for their fafety . Neither ought it any
thing to deface the pcrpetuall rule of liisiuftice, that he oftentimes
permitteth wicked men and eucll doers for a lime to reioice vnpuni-
flicd : and on the other fide fuftereth good and innocent to be lolfed
with many aduerfities , yea and to be opprefled with the malice and
vniult dealing of the vngodly. But rather a much cotrary confidcratio
ought to enter into our mindes : that when by manifcft (hew of his
wrath be puniflieth one (inne, we (hould therefore thinke that he ha-
tcth all finnes : and when he fuffercth many finnes to palfe vnpuni-
fhcd , wc fliould thereupon thinke that there flialbe an other judge- ,
ment to which they are difl'erred to be then puniflied.Likewife howe
great matter doth it minifler vs to confider his mercy,while he often-
times ctfT.th notrolliew his vnweried bountifulnelfe vponmifera-
ble finncrs in calling them home to him with more than fatherly
tcnderncflc, vntiUhc haue fubdued their frowardnclfe with doing
them good ^
7 To this end , where the Prophet particularly rehearfeth , how p^^^ ,
God in cafes pafl hope, doeth fodenly and wonderfully and bcfide all
B ij.
Cap. 5- Of the knowledge of
hopi jluccour men that arc in milene and in a mancr loft, wliethcr he
defend them wandering in wilderncfie from the wild bcaftesandat
length Icadeth them into the way againc , or minilticth foode to the
needy and hungry, or deliucreth pnfoners out of horrible dongeons
andyronbandes, or bnngeth mcnmpcnlloflhipwrackfjfe into the
hauen,or healcth the half dead of difenleSjOr fcorcherh the earth with
heat and drienclfe , or maketh it frutefull with fccrct watering of his
grace , or aduaiinceth the bafeft of the rafcall people , or thi oweth
dov/ne the noble Peeres from the hie degree of dignitie : by fuch ex-
amples fhewedfoorth hcCTathcreth thatthofc thinges which are iud-^
ged chaunccs happening by fortune , are fo many teftinionies of the
lieauently prouidecejandrpccially of his fatherly kindenefle, and that
therby is gcuen matter of reioycing to the Godh^and the wicked and
reprobate haue their mouthes Hopped . But becaufe the greater parte
infeited with their errors are blindc in Co clere a place of beholding,
therefore he cricth out that it is a gift of rare and lingular wifedome,
wifely to wey thefe works of God:by fight wherof they nothing pro-
fit that othcrwife feme moft clere fighted. And trucly how much foe-
uer the glorie of God doeth apparantly iLine before them,yet fca: fly
the hundreth man is a true beholder of it. Likewifc his power & wif-
dome arc no more hid in darknelfe : wherof the one, his power,doth
notably ,ippeare,when the Herce outragioufnelTeof the wicked being
in all mens opinion vnconqucrabie is beaten flat in one monKr,their
arrogancic tamcd,their ilrongcft holdcs rafed, their weapons and ar-
3." 3« mour broken in piecesjtheir ftrengihes fubdued, their dcuifes oucr-
thfowene, and themfelues fall with their owne weight , the prcfum-
ptuous boldneflrc,that auaunced it fclfe aboue the heauens is throwen
downe euen to the bottome point of the earth : againe,the lowly are
lifted vp out of the duft,& the needy raifcd from the donghill,ihe op-
prcflcd and affli(flcd are drawen out of extreme diftreflc , men in de-
ipaired flate are rellored to good hope , the vnarmed beare away the
vidory from the armed, fewrfrom many, the feeble from the ftrog. As
Cor. for his wifedome , it felfe fhewcth it lelfe manifeftly excellent , while
I >>• It difpofeth euery thing in littcft oportunitic , confoundcih the wife-
dome of the world be it ncuer fo pearcing , findcth out the fubtiie in
their fubiilric, finally gouerncth all things by mort conuenient order.
8 Wc fee that it nedcth no long or laborfome dcmoftration, to
fetch ojt tcftimonies , to fcruc foi the glorious dcclaratio and proofc
of Godsmaieihe: for by thefe few that we haue toudicd jtappearcth
that which way focuer a man chiunce to looke , they are fo common
and ready that they auy be eafily marked with eye , and pointed out
with
God the Creator. Lib.i. ii
with the finger. And here againejs to be noted, that we are called to
rhe knowledge of God , not (uch as contented with vainc fpcculatio,
doth but Hie about in the brainc , but fuch as flialbe found and frute-
fullpf it be rightly conceiued and take roote in our harts. For the Lord
is declared by his powers , the force whereof bccnuie we feele vvithm
vSjand doe enioy the benefits of them, it muft ncdes be that wc be in-
wardly moued much more liucly with fuch a knowledge , than if wc
ftioulde imagine God to be fuch one , of whom we fliould haueno
feeling. Whcrby we vnderftand that this is [he righted way and fitteft
order to feck God,not to attempt to enter depely with prefumptuous
curiofitie throughly to difculVe his fubftance, which is rather to be
reuerently worfliipped then fcrupuloufely ferched ; but rather to be-
hold him in his workes, by which he maketh himfclfe nere and fami-
liar, and doth in a maner communicate himfclfe vnco vs. And this the j^^^fm
Apoftle meant,when he layd,that God is not to be fought a farrc of, 27.
forafmuch as he with his molt piefent power dwelledi within euery l*la.t4y
one of vs. Wherfore Dauid, hauing before confefled his vnfpeakea ■
ble greamefie, when he defcendcth to the particular reherfall of his
workes, protefteth that the fame will {hew fort'i it felfe . Therefore
we alfo ought to geue our felues vnto fuch a fearching out of God,
as may fo hold our wit fufpended with admir5tion,that it may there- ^^ p^^j
withall throughly moue vs with effeduall feelmg. And,as Augulhne 144.
teacheth in an other place, becaufc we are not able to coceiue hmi,
it behoueth vs as it were fainting vnder the burden of his greatnefic,
to looke vnto his workes,that we may be refreflied with his goodnes,
9 Then fuch a knowledge ought not only to fhrre vs v p to the
wor{hippingofGod,but alfo to awake vs,3nd raife vs to hope of the
hfe to come. For when we coniidcr that fuch examples as God Ihc-
weth both of his mercifulnefle, and of his feueritie , arc but begun
and not halfe full : without dout we muft thinke,that herein he doth
but make a Ihew aforehand of thofe things,whereof the open dil'clo-
fing and full dcliuerance is diflferred vnto an other life. On the other
fide, when we fee that the godly are by the vngodly greued with af-
flidions, troubled with iniunes, opprefied with fclaunders, and vexed
v/ithdefpitefull dealings and reproches: contrary wife that wicked
dotrs do florifhjprofper,and obteinc quiet with honor, yea and that
vnpuniilied : we muft byandby gather that there flinlbe an other life,
whcrin is layd vp in ftore both due reuenge for wickcdnefle , and re-
ward for rightuoufneffe . Mor.eouer when we note that the faithful!
are often chaftifcd with the roddcs of the Lord , we may m oft cer^
tainly determine that much leffe the vngodly ftial cfcape his fcourges,
B iij.
Cap. 5. Of the knowledge of
. . For very well is that fpokcn of Auguftin. If euciy (inne fhould now
'i cap* ^^ piinillicd wUh open peine , it would be thought that nothing were
refcruc^d to the lalhudgcment. Again, if God fliouldnow openly pu-
nilh no (inne , it would be bclcued, that there were no prouidence of
God. Thcrfore we muft confeiTe , that in euery particular woorke of
GoHjbut priPvi pally in the vniucrfall generalitie of them, the powers
of God are fette forth as it were in painted tables, by which all man-
kindc is piouoked and allured to the knowledge of him , and from
knowledge to full and pcrfcd felicitic. But where as ihcfe his powers
do in his workes moft brightly appeare , yet what they principally
tende vnto , of wliar valoure they be , and to what end we ought to
weic them : this we then only attainc to vndcrRand when wc defccnde
into our fcluss,?.nd do coiilidcr by what mcanes God doth fliew forth
in vs his life, wildom, and power , and dorh vfe toward vs his righte-
oufneiTejgoodnefTe.ana mercyfuUkindnelle.For though Dauid luftly
f^-*?-. complainetlijthat the vnbclcuing do dote in folly, becaufc they weie
n jt the decpe coUnfailes of God in his goucrnance of mankinde : yet
that is alfo moft true, which he fait tn an otlicr pl.ice, that the won-
r- cerfull wifdom of God in that behalfe fxcedeth the heares of our
■^ ' hcade. But bccaufe this poind ih^ll hereafter in place conuenient be
more l^rgtly entreated,therfo:c I do at this time paffc it oucr.
ID But with howe great brightncs foeuer God doth in thcmiror
of his works fnewc byreprcfentation both himlclreand hisimmor-
t.Vdkingdome;yetfuch is our giolfc blockilhncflTcthat wc (imd dully
nmafcd at fo plaine ttftimonies, fo that they palTc away from vs with-
out proht. For, as touching the frame and moft beaurifull placing of
the world, howe many a one is there of vs, that when he either hf-
teth vp his eyes ro heaucn, or caftcth them about on the diuers coun-
tri . s of the earth doth dircd his mindc to remembrace of the creator,
•and doth not rather reft in bcholdir.g the workes without hauing re-
•^ard of the workman. But as touching thole things that daily happen
bcfide the order of natural cour(e,how many a one is there that doth
not more thinke that men are rather whirled about and rowllcd by
blind vnaduifcdnvirc of fortune, than goucrned by prouidcce of God.
B It if ar any time we be by the guiding & dire<ftio of thcfe things dri-
uen to the confidcrntion of God ( as all men muft nccdes be ) yet To
foone as we haucwitliout aJuifcment concciued a fctlins; of fomc
Godhead, wc byandby flidc away to the dotages or erroneous inucn-
tions of o'lr flefh , and with our vanity wc corrupt the pure verity of
God. Suhcercin indcedcwc differ one from an other , that cucry
man priuaicly by himfclfc procuicih to himftlfe lome peculiar error:
but
God the Creator. Lib. i . 12
but in this point we all arc molt like together,that wc all, not one ex-
cepted, doe depart from the one true God to monftruous trifles. To
which difcafe not onely common and grofl'e wits arc fubiedibut allb
the moft excellent and thofe that otherwife are endued with lingular
fharpnes of vnderftanding,are entangled with it.How largely hath the
whole fed of Philofophers bewraied their ownc dullnes and beallly
ignorance in this bchalfe ? For , to pafife ouer all the reft, which arc
much more vnreafonably foolini5Plato him/clfe the moft rehgious &
moft fober ofall the reft,vainly erreth in his round globe. Now what
might not chance to the othcr,whcn the cheefe of them, whofe parte
was to geue light to the reft, do thcmfelues Co erre and ftumblcPLike-
wife where Gods gouernancc of mens matters dothfo plainly proue
his prouidencc> that it can not be denied, yet this doth no more prc-
uail with men , than if they btlcucd that all things are toflcd vp and
down with the raOi will o f Fortune : (6 great is our inchnation to v a-
nity and error.I fpcake now altogether of the moft excellent,and not
of the common fort, whofe madnes hath infinitely wandered in pro-
phaning the truth of God.
1 1 Hecreof proceedeth that vnmeafurable fink ofcrrors , where-
with the whole world hath bin filled and ouerflowne.For ech mannes
wit is to himfelfc as a ma2c,ro that it is no marucllthat cuery fcuerall
nation was diuerfly drawen into feuerall dcuifes , and not that only,
but alfo that ech feuerall man had his feuerall gods by htmfclte. For
fince that rafh prefumption and vvDntonnes was ioined to ignorance
& darkeneflejthere hath bin fcarcely at any time any one man found,
that did not forge to himfelfc an idoleor fanfiein fteedeof God.
Truely euen as out of a wide and large fpring do ifliie waters, fo the
infinite number of Gods hath flowed out of the wit of man, while e-
uery manouer licencioufly ftraying,erroneoufly deuifeth this or that
concerning God himfelfe . And yet I nedc not here to make a regi-
fter of the fuperftitions , wherewith the world hath bin entangled:
becaufe both in fo doing I lliould ncuer haue end, and alfo though I
fpeake not one word of them, yet by fo many corruptions it fuffici-
cntly appcareth how horrible is the blindnes of mans minde.I pafl'eo-
uer the rude &vnlearned people.But amogthePhilofophers,which
enterprifed with reafon & learning to pcarce into heaue,how fhamc-
full IS the difagreement ? With the higher wytie that any of the was
cndued,and filled with arte and fciencc , with fo much the more glo-
rious coloures he Teemed to paint out his opinion . All which not-
withftan '^ing, if one do narowly lookc vpon,he (hall finde them to be
but vaniftiing falfe colours. The Stoickes feemed in thtir owne con-
B iiij.
Cap.5. Of the knowledge of
ceice co fpcakc very wifely , that out of all the partes of nature may
be g;ithcred dmers nanies of God, and yet that God being but one is
not thereby torne in funder . As though we were not already more
than enough enclined to vanity, vnlelTe a manifold plenty of gods fet
before vs Ihould further and more violently draw vs into errour. Alfo
the i^igyptians mifticall fciencc of diuinity llieweth,that they all di-
ligently endcuored to this cndjnot to feeme to erre without a reafon.
And it is pofllble,that at the hrft fight feme thing fceming probable,
might dcceiuc the fimple and ignorant : but no mortnll man cucr m-
ucntcdany chmg,wherby rcligio barh not bin fowUy corrupted. And
this foconfufe diuei lity emboKincd the Epicures &other grolVe defpi-
fers of godhncfle,by little and little to caft of all feeling of God . For
when they faw the wifert of all to ftnuc in contrary opini5s,they kic-
ked not out of their difa^reements,& out of the foolilli or apparantly
erroneous dotftrine of echof them,togather,thar men do in vaine &
fondly procure torments to themfelues while they ferche for God,
which IS none at all. And this they thought that they might freely do
Without punilliment , bccaufc it was better brecfcly to deny vttcrly,
that there is any God, than to faync vnccrtaine Gods, and fo to raifc
vp contentions thatneucrfliouldhauc ende. And to much fondly do
they reafon, or rather cad a milt, to hide their vngodlmeirc by igno-
rance of men, whereby it is no reafon that any thing ihould be taken
away from God . But forafmuch as all do confelle , that there is no-
thing, about which both the learned and vnlearned do fo much difa-
grec,thercupon is gathered that the wittcs of men are more than dull
and blinde in heauely millcrics, that do fo erre in feekin^ out of God.
Some other do praife that anfwere of Symonidcs j winch being dc-
maunded of king Hieron what God was , defired to haue a d.iyes rc-
fpite graunted him to fludy vp6 it. And when the next day following,
the king dcmaunded the (ame quc:ftion,he required two daies refpite,
and fo oftentimes doubling the number of dayes at length he anfwe-
rcd:How much the more I confider it, fo much the harder the matter
feemech vnto mc.Bjt graunting that he did wifdy to fufpend his fen-
tence of fo darkc a matter , yet hereby appeareth, that if men be only
taught by nature,they can know notliing ccrtainIy,foundly,& plain-
ly concerning God, but only are tycd to confufed principles to wor-
fiiip nn vnknowen God.
11 Now wcmuft alio hold, ihatall they that corrupt the pure rcli-
gio (as all they muft needes do that arc C'uc to their owne opinion)do
depart fro the one God. They will bonft that their meaning is other-
wirc:but what they nicanc, or what they pcrfuadc thefclucs maketh
not
Ood the Creator. Lib.i. 13
not much to the matter/ith the holy Ghoft pionouccth,that all ihcy
arc Apoftates, that according to the darknes of their own minde do
thruit deuils in the place of God.For this reafoEi, Paule pronoiinccth
that the Ephelians were without a God,rill they hadde learned by the ^P"^***
Gofpcljwhat it was to vvorlhip the true God. And we muft not thinke
this to be fpokcn of one nation only, for as much as he generally af- j^^,^ ,^
firmcth in an other place , that all raenne were become vaine in their 21,
imaginations, (ins that in the creation of the world , the Maicftie of
the Creator was difclofcd vnto them. And thcrtore the fcripture , to
make place for the true and one only God , condemneth of falfehod
and lyiug , whatlbcuer godhead in old time was celebrate among the
Gentilc5,and Icaueth no God at all, but in the moiite Sion,wher flou- Abaci,
rilhed the peculiar knowledge of God. Trucly among the Gentiles i8.zo.
the Samaritans in Chnftcs time Teemed to approche nighelt to true ^"""♦«
godhnt lie : and yet we hcare it fpoken by Chrii^es owne mouth , that
they knew not what tI)eywor(hipped.Whervponfoloweth,thatthey
were dcceiucd with v.ime error. Finally although they were not all in-
feded with grofle faultcs,or fell into open idolatrics^yet was there no
true and approued relit;ion that was grounded only vpon common
reiibn. For all be it , that there were a few that were not fo madde as
the common people were , yet this dodrine of Paule remaineth cer- i.Cor.t
tainiy true , that the princes of this world conceiue not the wifdom 8.
of God. Now if the moft excellent haue wandred in darkneffc , what
is to be faid of the very dregges ? Wherefore it is no meruaylc, if the
holy Ghoft do refufe as bayard worfhippings all formes of worfhip-
ping deuiftd by the will of men . Bycaufc in heauenly mifteries opi-
nion CO jeiued by witt of men,olthough it do not alway brt de a heapc
of errourSjyctJS alway tiie mother of errour. And though there come
no vvorfe of it , yet is this no fmall fault , at aduenture to worrtiip an
vnknowen God : of which fault all they by Chriltes own mouth are ^°^" ^
pronoiiccd gilty,that are not taught by the law what God they ought
to worJhip. And truly the beft lawmakers that euer were > proceded
no further, than to faie that religion was grounded vpon common
confent.Yea and in Xenophon Socrates praifed the anfwere of Apol-
lo, wherin he willed that eueryman fhould worfliip gods after the
maner of the countrcy , and the cuftome of his owne citie. But how
came moriall men by this power , of their owne authorine to deter-
mine that which farre furmounteth the world ? or who can fo rcftc in
the decrees of the elders, or common ordinaunccs of peoples , as to
receaue without douting a God deliuered by mannes deuife.^ Euery
man rather will ftand to his owne iudgemem , than ycld him fclfe to
lU
Cap. 5. Of the knowledge of
the will of an other . Sith thcrfore it is to weake and fcble a bonde of
godlinefle,in worfhipping of God to folow either a cuftom of a citic,
or the confcnt of 3ntiquitie,it remaineth that God him fclfe muft tc-
ftifie of him felfe from heauen.
15 In vamc thcrfore fo many lampes hglnncd do fhine in the edi-
fice of the world, to fhcw forth the glory of the creator , which do fo
cucry way difplay their beamcs vpon vs, that yet of them felues they
cannot bring vs into the right way. Indeedc they raifc vp certainc
fparkles,but fuch as be choked vp before that they can fprcde abrode
any full brightncfle. Therfore the Apoftle in the fame place where he'
calleth the ages of the world images of thingcs inuifible,faith further,
that by faith is perceyucd, that they were framed by the word of
•"• God:meaning therby that the inuifible godhead is in dccde reprefen-
'* ted by fuch fliewcs,but that wc hauc no eyes to fe the fame through-
ly, vnles they be enlightncd by ihc reuel.itjon of God through faith.
And Paulc, where he teacheth that by the creation of the world was
difclofed that which was to be knowne concerning God, doth not
meane fuch a difclofing as may be comprehended by the wit of men:
but rather flieweth , that the fame procedeth no further but to make
^&-»7« them vnexcufible. The fame Panic alfo , although in one place he
md 27. faith,thatGodisnottobefoughtafarreof,asone that dwelleih with-
.' I J' in vs ; yet in an other place teachcth to what end that nerencfTc auay-
' Icth. ]n the ages paft ( faith he ) God fuftred the nations to walke in
their owne waies : yet he left not him felfe without teOimonie,doing
good from heauen J geuing fliowres and fruitfull feafons , fillyngthe
hartcs of men with foode & gladiiefTe.Howfoeucr therfore the Lord
be not without teftimonic,while with his greate and manyfold boun-
tyfulnefie he fwectly allurcth men to the knowledge of him : yet for
all that, they cede not to folow their ownc waieSjthat is to fay, their
damnable errors.
14 But although we want natural power,wherby we can not climbc
vp vnto the pure and cleare knowledge of God, yet bycaufe the fault
of our dulncflc is in our fclucs,therforc all colour of cxcufe is cutte a-
way from vs. For we can not fo pretcndei£;norancc,but thatcucn our
confcience doth ftill condcmnc vs of flouthfulnclfc and vnthankcf ul-
ncffc. It is a dcfenfc forfooth right worthy to be rcceiued,if m'an will
allct^ethat he wanted eares to hearc the truth, for the publilliing
wherof the very dombc creatui es haue lowde voices : if man Ihall lay
that he can not fee tliofc thingcs with his eyes , which the creatures
without eyes do (hew him : if man Omll lay for his excufc the fcble-
nclTc of his wit , where all creatures without rcafon do inftrud him:
Whcr-
God the Creator. Lib.i. 14
Wherefore (irh all things do flicw v$ the right way , we are worthily
put from all excufc of our wandering and ftraying out of the way.
But how foeuer it is to be imputed to the fault of men, that they do
byandby corrupt the fcedeofthe knowledge of God, fowen in their
mindes by maruclous workmanfhip of nature/o that it groweth not
to eood Si cleane fruite:yet it is moft trucjthat wc are not fufficiently
inftruded by thatb.uc and fimple teftimony,that the creatures doho-
norably declare of Gods glory. For (o foonc as wc hauc taken by the
beholding ofthe world a fmaletaftof the Godhead, we leauingthe
true God do in Itcade of him raife vp dreames and fanfies of our owa
brayne,and do conucy hither and thither from the true fountaine the
praifc of rightcoufnes, wifdom, goodnefle and power . Morcouer we
do fo either obfcure, or by jU cftceming them, dcpraue his daily do-
jngSjthat we take away both from them their glory,and from the au-
thor his due praifc.
The vj. Chapter.
That,t« attaint to God the Creator, it is nedefull to haue the Scripturt
to be oHrgmde and tnatjlrejfc^
THcrefore ahhough that fame brightneflcjwhich both inhca-
ucn and earth fiiineth in the eyes of all men, doth fufficiently
take away all defence from the wickcdnelfe of men , euen lo
as Godjto wrap all mankind in one giltines,doth fliew his di-
uinemaieftie to all without exception as it were portrayed out in
his creatures ; yet is it neccffary that we haue alfo an other & a better
liclpe that may rightly dired vs to the very creator of the world.
Therfore not in vaine he hath added the light of his word,thai ther-
by he mou^ht be kno wen to faluacion. And this prerogatiue he hath
vouchefaued togiuciovs, whom it plcafedhim more nerely and
more famihariy to draw together to himfelfe.For becaufe he faw the
mindes of all men to be caricd about with wandering and vnftedfaft
motion, after he had chofen the lewes to his peculiar flocke, he com-
paflcd ihem in as it were with barres,that they fliould not wander out
in vanity as other did. And not without caufe he holdctli vs with the
fame meane in the true knowledge of himfelfe . For oiherwife euen
they fhould c]uickly fwaruc away that feeme to ftand ftedfaft in com-
parison cff other. For as old men, or poore Mind, or they whofe eyes
are dimmc lighted, if you lay a fayre booke before them,though.they
perceiue that there is fomwhat wrytten therin, yet can they not read
two words together : but being holpe with fpcdaclesfet betwene the
& It, they begin to read djftin^lly:fo the Scrip cure gathering vp togc-
Cap. 6. Of the knowledge of
thcrinour minds the knowledge o: God, which otherwifeisburco-
fufcdjdoch rcmoue ihc mift, and plainly fliew vs the true God. This
thcrforc is a fingular gift,that to ihc inltrudio ofhis church god vfeth
not only dummc teachers, but alfo opcncth his own holy niourh:not
only pubhfheth that there is Ibmc God to be worOuppcd , but alfo
thcrwithali pronounceth that he himfcltc is the fame God whom we
ought to worfhip : tand uoth not only teachc the clcCt to looke vpon
God,but alfo prefcntcili htmfclfe vnto them to be looked vpon. This
order hath he kept fro the beginning toward lus church, befide thcfc
common mftrudtdns to giuc them alfo Lis word. Which is the righ-
ter &ccrtainer marke to know him by And it is not to be douted,that
Adam,Noe, Abraham and the reft oi the fathers by this hcl;.^' attai-
ned to that familiar kno\vledgc,which made tho.Ti as it were ieuerally
different from the vnbeleuers. I fpeakc not yet of the proper dodrine
of faith , wherewith they were enlightened into the hope ofetcrnall
life. For, that they might palT? from deat!i to life , it was nedcfull for
them to know God not onely to be the creator,but alfo the rcdemer:
as douilefle they obtcined both by the word. For that kinde of know-
ledge wherby was giuen to vnderftand who is the God by whom the
world was made and is gouernedjin order came before the oiher:and
then was that other inward knowledge adioyncd,which onely quick-
' neth dead foulcs , whereby God is knowen not only to be the maker
of the world and the only author &iiidge of all things that are done,
but alfo to be the redcmer in the pc; fon of that mediator.But becaufe
I am not yet come to the fallof ihc world and corroprion of nature,
I will omit alfo to entreate of the remedy thereof. Therefore let ihc
readers remember that I do not yet fpeake of the couenaunt whereby
God hath adopted tohimfelfe the children of Abraha,& of that fpe-
cial parte of dodrinc whereby the faithfull hauc alw ay bin pccuLarly
feuered from the prophane nati6s:becanfe that dodrinc was founded
vpon Chnft •• but I fpeake how we ought to leaine by the Scripture,
that God which is the creator of rhe world, is by ccrtaine markesfe-
ucrally difcerned from the counrcrfait multitude of falfc Gods. And
then the order it fdfc fhall conucnicntly brmg vs to the rcdemer.But
although we Ihall alleage many tcftimonics out of the newe Tcfta-
mcnt,& fomc alfo out of the law & the J'rophcts, whcrem is exprcfle
mention made of Chnft : yet they fhall all tend lo this end,>o proue
that in the fcnpturc is difclofcd vnto vs God the creator of the world,
& in the Scripture is Cct foorth what we ought to think of him,to the
end that we fliould not feke about the bulh for an vncertain godhead.
1 But whcilui God wcic knowen to the fathers by oracles & vill-
ous.
God the Creator. Lib.i. 15
ons,or whether by the meanifc miniftration of me he informed thcni
of that which they fhould from hand to h.inci dcljuer to their pofte-
rity:yet it is vndoutedly true that in their harts was engraucn a ftedfait
certainty of dodrincjlo as they mioht he perlwaded & vnderftad,thac
it which they had learned came f-ro God. ForGodalwayes made vn-
douted aflurancc tor credit of his v/crd , which farre exceeded all vn-
certaine opinion. At Icns^ch that by cotinuall proceeding of do«flrine ,
the tructh furuiuing in all ages might ilill remaine in the worlde, the
fame oracles which he had left with the fathers , his pleafure was to
hauc as it were enrolled in publike tables. For this cntent was the law
pubhlhcd , whereunto after were added the Prophets for expofirors.
For though there were diuerfe vfes olr the Inw, as herafrer Oiall better
. appeare in place conuenicnt : and fpecially the principall purpofe of
Moifes and all the Prophets was to teach the manner of recociliation
betwene God and men, for which caufc alfo Paule callcth Chrift the Ro.zo.4
end of the law:yet, as 1 fay once againe, belide the proper dodrine of
faith and repentance which flieweth forth Chrift the mediatour,thc
Scripture doth by certaine marks and tokens paint out the oncly and
true God , in that that he hath created and doth goucrne the world,
to the end he (hould be feuerally knowen and not reckncd in the fallc
nomber of fained Gods . Therefore although it behoueth man ear-
neftly to bend his eyes to confider the works of God,forafmuch as he
is fet as it were in this gorgeous ftagc to be a beholder of them : yet
principally ought he to bend hiseares to the word, that he may bet-
ter profit thereby. And therefore it is no marucll that they which arc
borne in darkncfle do morc&more waxe hard in their amafed dulnes,
becaufe very fewe of the do giuc thcmfelues pliable to learnc of the
word of God, whereby to kepe them within their boundes, but they
rather reioife in their own vanity .Thus the ought we to hold,that to
the end true religion may fhine amog vs,we muft take our beginning
at the heauenly do(itrine. And that no man can haue any taft be it nc-
uer fo little of true and (bund dodrine, vnlefle he haue bin (choler to
the Scripture . And from henfe growcth the originall of true vndcr-
ftandingjthat we reuerently embrace whatfoeuer it pleafcth God ther-
in to tcftifie of himfelfe. For not only the perfcd & in all pointes ab-
folutc taithjbut al;o all right knowledge of God fpringeth from obe-
dience. And truely in this bchaltc God of his lingular prouidecc hath
prouidcd for men in and for all ages.
J For if \vc confider how flippcry an inclinatio man? minde hath
toflidc intofoi^^ tfulnc"* of God , howore;»t art-dmcs tofillin to all
kiiuicofcrrorsjhow great a lull to forge oftentimes new &coutcrfait
Cap.(^. Of the knowledge of
jcligions, we may thcrbjr perceiue how ncceliarie it was to hauc the
hc.iuenly dodrine (o put in writing , that it (liould not either periHi
by forgctfuhieSjOr grow vainc by errour, or be cormpred by boldncs
of men . Sith therefore it is manifcft that God hath ahvay vfed the
helpc of his word , toward ail thofe whom it plealed him at any time
frutefuUy to inltrud , bccaufc lie forfaw that his image cmprintcd in y^r
moft beautiful forme of the world was not futficictly effe<!:tuall:Ther- *
fore It behoucth vs to trauailc this ftrai^ht way, if we carncftly couet
to attainc to the true beholding of God. We mult, I lay, come to his
word , whcrin God is well and liucly fet out by his workcs , when his
workcs be wcycd not after the pcrucrfnclfc ot our owne iudgcmcnt,
but according to the rule of the eternal] trueth . If we f.varue from
that word , as I faied euen now, although we runnc neucr fo fail , yet
wc lliall neucr attain to the markc, bccaufe the courfc of our running
is out of the way.For thus we mult thinke, that the brightnclle of the
3.Tim.6 face of God,which the Apoftle callcth fuch as cannot be atteined vn-
-*«»• to,is vnto vslikeamaic, out of winch we cannot vnwrap ourfclues,
vnlcfle we be by the line of the word guided into it : fo that it is much
better for vs to halt in this way, than to runne ncuer fo bft in an o-
Pra.^.Sf ther. And therfore Dauid often times when he teacheth that fupcr-
S^6' 97- fticions are to be ta'<en away out of the world, that pure religion may
5*&c-flonni, bringeth in God reigning: meaning by this word reigning,
not the power that he hath , but the dodrinc wherby he chalengcth
to himfclfe a lawfull gouernemet:bccaufc errors can neuer be rooted
out of the hartes of men,ti;l the true knowledge of God be planted.
4 Therfore the fame Prophetc,aftcr that he hath recited that the
Pfj. i^. hcauens declare the glory of God, that the firmametOicweth fourth
the workes of his handcs,that the orderly fucceeding courfc of daics
and niglitcs preachcth his maieftic, then defccndcth to make mcntio
of his word. The law of the Lord (faieth he) is vndeHled,conuerting
foulcs : the wittielfc of the Lord is faithfuU , geumg wifdom to little
oncs:tlie rif:hteoiifnc{Tcs ofthe Lord are vpright,making harts chcre-
full: tliecommandcmcnt of the Lord is bright geuing light to the
eyes. For ahhou Ji he comprchcndeth alfo the other vfcs ofthe law,
yetincencialifie hcmcanctli, that forafmucli as God doth invamc
call vnto him all nations by the beholding of the hcauen and earth,
therfore tins is the pccuhar fthoolc ofthe children of God.l he fame
mcanint; hath the xxix. Plalmcjwhere the Prophet haumg preached
ofthe terrible voice of God, which in thunder ,windcs, Ihcwres,
. whirlewindcs and Ilormcs.fliaketh the earth, maketh the mouniaines
lo ticmblc , and brcakcih the cedfc trees : in the cndc at laft he gocih
further
God the Creator. Lib.i. i5
further and faith , that his praifcs are fong in the fanduaric ^ becaulc
the vnbelcuers arc deafe and hearc not all the voices of God that re-
founde in the aire. Andinhke manner in another Pfalme, after that pfa.^.
he had dcfcnbed the terrible wanes of the Sea , he thus concludeth: j.
thy tcftimonics are verified, the beauty of thy temple is holyncfle for
^€uer. Andoutof thismeanmgalfo proccdcd that whicii Chrift faul
^ to the woman of Samaria, that her nation and the reft did honor that
which they knew not , and that onely the lewes did worfliip the true ^ ^ " *"
God. For wlicras the wit of man by reafon of the feblcneffe thcrof * n
can by no meane attain vnto God , but being holpen and hfted vp by Ip"*^ ^
his holy word, it folowcd of ncceftitie , that all men , cxceptc the
^cwes, did wander invanite andcrrour, becaufeihcy fought God
without his word.
The vij. Chapter.
By what tejlimonie the Scripture ought to be efi^Upjed^ that is hy the vvitnejft
of the holy Ghofi^ that the authorttie xherofmay rematne certain, ^nd
that it is a wicked muention to fay that the credit therofdoeth
hang vpon the iudgement of the Church,
BV T before I go any furtherjit is nedefull to fay fbmwhat of thepjd
authoritie of the Scripture , not only to prepare mens mindcs
to reucrence it , but alfo to take away all dout thcrof. Now,
when it is a matter confefl'ed that it is the word of God that is
there lettc forth, there is no man ot io deiperate boldniLlPil, Vllll'lU' liL — -
be voide of all common fenfe and naturall wit of man , that dare de-
rogate the credit of him that fpeaketh it . But becaufe there arc not
daily oracles gcuen from heauen , and the only Scriptures remainc
wherin it hath pleafed the Lord to prcfernc his truth to perpetual mc-
moric, the fame Scripture by none other meanes is of full credit a-
mong the faithfulljbut in that they do beleue that it is as vcrely come
from heauen as if they heard the liuely voice of God to fpeake therin.
This matter in dcede is right worthy both to be largly entreated of
and diligently weyed. But the readers fhall pardon me if herein I ra-
ther rcgarde what the proportion of the worke which I haue begon
may bearejthan wha^,ihe iargenefle of the matter rcquireth.Thcre is
growcn vp amonejj|g|»oft part ofmenamoft hurtfull error , that
the |kr^|urHj||j^^^^^mjdi aufhority as by common confentof
the Church is gcuci^ru^^as if tne eternail and inuiobbic trueth o{
God did It ft vpon the pleafure of men. For (b,to the great fcornc of .
ihc holy Goft , tncy afke of vs v. ho canafllire vs that thefe Scrip- Qixofifi
turcs came from God : or who can alfertaine vs that (hey haue contw
Cap. 7. Of the knowledge or
tucd vnto our age fafc and vncorrupced : who can peifwadc vs , that
i!.is one booke ought to be reuerently rcceiued, and that other to be
ftriken out of the number of Scripture, vnlcs the church did appoint
a ccrtainc rule of all thefc things?It hangcth therforc(fay they)vpon
the determination of the church , both what reuercncc is due to the
Scripture, & what bookcs are to bcTcckened >n the canon thcrof So
thcle robbers of Gods honor , while thev (cekc vnder colour of the
church to bring in an vnbrideled tyranny,care nothing with what ab-
furditics they fnare both themfelues and other, fo that they may en-
.'.'wt^ force this one thing to be bcleued among the fimplc,that the church
^"'»-^ can do all thinges. But if it be fo: what fhall become of the poore
confciences that feeke ftedfaft aflurance of cternall life, if all the pro-
nufcs that remaine thereof (land and be ftaied onely vpon the ludgc-
ment of men ? When they recciuc fuch anfwcrc , fhali they ceafe to
waucr and tremble? Again to what fcornes of the vngodly is our faith
made fubied ? into how great fufpicion with all men is it bt ought, if
this be beleued that it hath but as it were a borowed credit by the fa-
uour of men.
z But fuch bablers are well confuted cuen with one word of the
Dph.». ' Apcftlc.He tcftifieth that the church is builded vpon the foundation
^°' of the Prophets and Apoftlcs.If the dodrine of the Prophets,and A-
poftles be the foundacion of the Church : then muft it nccdes be,that
the fame^dodrjneftodejn ftedfaft certaintie, before that the Church
■ *began*to be . Nether can they well cauil , that although the Church
take her firft beginning therof,yet ic remaineth doutfuU what is to be
fayed the writinges of the Prophetcs and Apoftles,vnle(fe the iudge-
ment of the Church did declare it. For if the Chriftian Church were
at the beginning bull Jed vpon the writinges of the Prophetes and
preaching of thcApoftles:wherefocuer thatdodrinc fhalbe foud,thc
allowed credite therof was furely before the Church , without which
the Church it fclfe had ncucr bin.Therfore it is a vaine forged deuife,
that the Church hath power to iudge the Scripture,fo as the certain-
tic of the Scripture Ihould be thought to hang vpon the will of the
Clunvh. Whcrfore when the Church doth rcceiue the Scripture and
fcalcth ifwith her confcnting teftimonie , flie doth not of a thing
doutfull,and that othcrvvifc Oiould be in controucrfie, make it autcn-
tike and of credit: but bccaufclheacknowledgcthit to be ihe-Mucth
of her God, according to her dutie of godlincftc without delay flic
doth honor it. Whcras they demaud,how fliall vre be perfwaded that
it came from God,vnlcffc we rcfort to the decree of thcChurch?This
is all one as if a man fhou'd af ke , how fliall wc learnc to know light
from
God the Creator. Lib.i. 17
from daikncfie, white from blacke,or fwetc from lowcr.For the Scri-
pture Hicwcth in it fclfe no Icfle apparaunt fcnfe of her tructh , than
white and blackc things do ofthcyr colour, or fweie & fower things
of their taft.
J I know that they commonly alleagc the faying of Augufline,
where he fayth that he would not beleue the Gofpcll , Uue iliat the Contra
authority of the church mt)ued him thcrto.But how vntrucly &cauil- epift.fu
loi)fly it is alleged for fuch a meanmg,by the whole tenor of his wry- <^amcn-
taic-m.
ting It is cafy to perceiue, He had to do with the Manichees, whith
required to be belcucd without gainefaying,when they vaunted that cjuywtn
they had the truth on their (ide^butproued it not. And to make their ^'^"^"^
Manichcus to be belcued,they prcteded the Gofpel.Now Auguftinc
asketh the what they would do,if they did light vp6 a man that would
not beleue the Gofpell it fclfe, with what maner of perfwafion they
would draw him to their opinio. Afterward he fayeth.I my felf would
not beleue the GofpeU.&cfaue that the authority of the church mo-
iled me therto.Meaning that he himfelfe, when he was a (h aunger f: 5
the faith, could not otherwifc be brought to embrace the Golpcl for
theafTured truethof God, butby this that he was ouercom with the
authority of the church. And what marueli is it, ifa man not yet kno-
wing Chriftjhaue rcgarde to mcnPAuguftine therforc doth not there
teach that the faith of the godly is grounded vpo the authority of the
church.nor meancth that the certainty of the gofpel doth hang ther-
upo.but (imply & only,that there fliould be no aflurednes of the Go-
fpell to the infidels,whcrcby they might be won to Chritt vnlclle the
cofcnt of the church did dnuc them vnto it.And the fame meaning a
httle before he doth plainly cofirme in this faying. Whe 1 (lull praifc Conrra
that which I beleue, & fcorne that which thou beleucl^jwhat thmkr ft cpift.fi
thou mete for vs to iudge or do?but that we forfake fuch men as firft damen-
call V.I to come & know certainc truethes and after commaundc vs to talem.
beleue things vnccrtainc: arvJ that we follow them that require vs firft '^P*'^^
to beleue that which we are not yet able to fee,^at being made ftrog
by beleuing we may attaine to vndcrftad the thing that we beleue:noc
men now,but God himfelfe inwardly ftrengthning and giuing light to
our minde. Thefearethe very words of Auguftinetwherbyeucry ma
may eafcly gather, that the holv man had not this meaning, to hang
the credirc that we hauc to the Scriptures vpon the will and a war de-
ment ofthe church, but ondy to (hew this, (which we ourfclue.v aifb
do confclTc to be true) that they which are not yet lightncd with the
fpirite of God,are brought by the reuercce of the church vnto a wil-
lingneilc to be caught,fo as they can Hnde in their hartes to icarnc the
Q
Cap. 7. Of the knowledge of
faith otChrift by the Gofpcll : and due ihus by this meanc the au-
thoiityoFthc churchis an introdudion, whereby we are prepared to
bclcuc the G jCpcll. For, as we fee, his mindc is that the aiVurancc of
the godly be Hayed vpon afirothcr foundation. Oihcrwife I do not
'ontra '^^■"y but that he often prelTeth the Mantchccs with the confcntof
aultu the whole church,wlicn he fencih to proue the (amc Scripture which
'b.3»' they rcfufcd. And from hence it came, that he fo reprochcd Fauftui
for thar he did not yeld hmifcU'c to the iriicth of the Gofpel fo i;rou-
dcd,fo ibbhllud/o glorioufly renomed, & from the very time of the
Apoftles by ccrtaine fucccflions perpetually commended. But he ne-
' uer trauailcth to this end , to teach that the authority which we ac-
knowledge to be in the Scripture, hangcth vpon the determination
or decree of mcn.But only thi$,which made much for him in the mat-
ter yhedifputed ofjhe bringcth forth the vniuerfall iudgemenr of the
"Su^. dc churchjwherin he had the auautage of his aduerfarics. If any dcfire a,
rtitita- fuller profe herof,let him readc his booke c5ccrning the pioHt ot be-
c cred. jeuing. Where he Ihall finde that there is no other redinelfe of bcliefc
commended vnto vs by him,but that which only giueth vs an emrie,
and is vnto vs a conuenicnt beginning to enc|uire,as he tcrmeth it :&
yet not that we ought to reft vpon bare opinion, but to leane to the
certaine and found trueth.
4 We ought to holde, as I before fayd , that the credit of this do-
ctrine,is not eftablifhed in vs,vntil fuch time as we be vndoutedly per-
fwadcd that God is the author thereof. Therforc the principall profe
of the Scripture is commonly taken of the perfon of God the fpeaker
of it. The Prophctes and Apoftles boft not of their owne (harpe wit
or any fuch things as procure credit to men that fpeakc:ncithcr ftand
they vpon proues by reafon,but they bring foorth the holy name of
Godjtherby to copcU the whole world to obedience. Now we haue
to fee how not only by probable opinion, but by apparant trueth it is
cuidct,^hat in this bchalfc the name of God is not without caufe nor
deceitfully pretended . If then we will prouide well for confcicnces,
that they be not cotinunlly caried about with vnftedfaft dooting, nor
may w3uer,nor ftjy at eucry fmalc ftop,this niancr of perfuafion muft
be fctdied dcper then from either the reafons,iudgcments or the co-
ic(fiures of men , euen from tlic fccrete tcftimony of the holy Ghoft.
True in dcede it is , that if we lifted to worke by way ofargumentcs,
many thinges might be alleged that may calily prone, if there be any
God in hcaum, that the law , the prophecies and the Gofpcll came
from him . Yea although men le.irncd and of dcpc ludgcment would
Itand vp to the contrary, and would employ 5c llicw fuorth the whole
force
God the Creator. Lib.i. i8
force of their wits in this difputation : yet if ihev be not Co hardened
as to become dcfperatly fhamclcilc, they woulil be compelled to c6-
ftilf: , thatthcre arc feencin the Scripture maniftft tokens that it is
God that fpcakcth thcrin:whereby it may appeare that tlie dodnnc
thcrofis fr5 hcaue.And fliortly hcraftcr we Ihal rce,rhat all the books
of the holy Scripture do far excel all other writings what focucrthty
be. Yea if wc bring thither pure eyes & vncon uptcd fcnfes, we lliall
foorthwith findc there the maieftie of God, which fhall fubdue all
hardncfiTe of gainefaying and enforce vs to obey him. But yet chcy do
diforderjyjthat by difputarion trauel to eftabhlh the perfed credit of
the Scripturc.Andtrucly although I am not furnilhed with great dex-
tenty,nor eloquence :yet if I were to c5tend with the moft futtlc de-
fpifers of God, that haue a dehre to fhew themfelues witty and plea-
faut in febling the authority of Scripturejl truft it fhould not be hard
for me to put to filece their bablings. And if it were profitable to fped
labour in confuting their caiiilbtions, I would with no great bufines
fhakc in funder the braggcs that they mutter in corners . But tliough
a man do deliuerthe found wordof Godfrom thereprochesofmen,
yet that fufficeth not foorthwith to fatten in their harts that affui cd-
nefTe that godlincs requircth.Prophane men bccaufe they thinke re-
ligion ftandeth only in opinio, to the end they would bcleue nothing
fondly or lightly, do couet and require to haue it proued to them by
reafon,that Moifes & the Prophetcs fpake fiom God.ButI anfwere
that the tcftimony of the holy Ghoftis better than allrcaron. For as
only God is a conucnient witncfle of himfelfc in his owne worde, fo
ihall the fame word ncuer finde credit in the haries of men,vntill it be
fealed vp with the inward witnes of y holy Ghoft.It behoueth there-
fore of neceffity that the fame holy Ghoft which fpak by the mouth
of the Prophetes , do enter into ourhartes to perfAade vs that they
fayth fully vttered hat which was bv God commaunded them. And
this order is very aptly fet foorth by Efny in thefe wordcs. My fpirite Efay ji.
which is in thee and the words that I haue put in thy mouth & in the ^6.
mouth of thy (hde fhall not fade foreuer.lt grcueth fbmegood men,
that they haue not ready at hand fome cleare profe to allege , when
the wicked do without puniilimcc murmure againft the word of God:
As though the holy Ghott were not for this caufe called both a fealc
and a plcdgCjbecaufe vntill he do lighten mens mindes they do alway
wauer among many doutinus.
^ Let this therfore ftand for a certainly pcrfwaded truth, rhar they
whom the holy Goft hath inwardly taught , do whoicly reft vppon
tlic Scripture^and chat the Umc Scrrpturc is to be credited for it fcltc
C .J.
Cap. 7. Of the knowledge of
fakcand ought not to be made fubicdco dcmonftration & rcafonR
but yet that the certaincty which it gctteth among vs, itairemcth bjr
the witncfl'c of the holy GbolV. For though by the only maicily of it
fclfe It procurcth rcucrcce to be giuen to it:yet then only it through-
ly perccth our att^dions , when it is fcalcd in our bancs by the holy
Ghofk . So being lightened by his vcrtue, we do then belcuc^ not by
our owneiudccmcnf,or other mens, that the Sciipture is fiom God:
but abouc all mans iudgemcnt we hold it moft ccrrainly determined,
euen as ifwe beheld the maitftyofGodhimfelfe there prefcnt, that
by the minillciy of men it came to vs fro the very mouth of God.VVc^
iecke not for argumentcs & likelihodcs to reft our iudgemcnt vpon:
but as to a thing without all compalTc of cofiJeraiion, we fubmit our
judgement & wit vntoit.And thatnotin fuch forte as fome are wont
fomcrime haftily to take holde of a thing vnknowcn,which after be-
ing throughly perceiued difplcafeth them : but becaufe we arc in our
conferences well aflurcd that wc hold an inuinciblc trueth . Ne iiher
in (uch forrcjas (illy men arc wont to ycld their minde in thraldom to
lupciftitions.-but becaufe we vndouiedly pcrcciue iherin the ftrength
& breathing of the diuine maieftie, wherewith we are drawen & ttir-
rcdtoobcy, both wittingly and wiliinr,ly, and yet more liuely and
(2. Az t'flt dually than mans wiU^rwiite can attaine. And ihcrfore for good
0. ' ' caufc dorh God cry out by Efay, that the Prophetes with the whole
people do bcare him witnefTe , becaufe being taught by prophecies
they did vndcutedly beleue without guile or vnceitainty that God
himfelfc had fpoken.Such therfore is our perfwafion, as requircth no
rcafons : fuch is our knowlcdgcas hath a right good reafon to main-
lainc ir,cue fuch a one,whercin the mindc more afluredly & ftcdfaft-
ly rerteih ihi vpo any reafonstfuch is our feeling,as can not proceedc
but bv leuclation from heauen.I fpeakc now of none other thing but
that which euery one of the faithfiill doth by experiecc findc in him-
relfc>fauing that my words do much want of a full declaration of it. I
Icauc hcie many things vnfpoke,becaufc there wil be elfwhere againc
3 conuenient place to entreatc of this matter. Only now let vs know,
that only that is the true faith which the fpirite of God doth fealc in
our harts. Yea with thisonly reafon will the fobcr reader and willing
•Ci. 54. to Icarnc, be contented. Efay pronuftthahat al the children of the re-
i- nurd church flialbe the fcholcrs of God . A fingular piiuilcgc therm
doth God vouchfaue to graunt to his elcd oncly, whom he fcucrcth
from nil the reil of mankindc. For what is the beginning of true do-
drine, but a ready chcrcfulneflTe to here the voice of God ? But God
rcquuciii to be heard by the mouth of Moifcs,as it is wrytten-iay not
in
i
God the Creator. Lib.i. ip
in thy hartf ,who Ihall afccnd into heauen, or who (hall defccnd v ico
the depcPche word is eucn in thine ovvne jr.outh.Ifit be the pl:.ilure
of God that this treafureof vndcrftindingbebydvpin llorc for ins
children, it is no marucll nor vnlikely, that in the common multitude Dcu.j «
of men is feene fuch ignorance and duIncfTcThe common multitude 1 2
I call euen the moft excellent of thc,vntil fuch time as they be grafted ^^^' '"-^
into the body of the church. Morcoucr Efay giuing warnmg tiiat the ^'^ ^■
Prophets dodrinc (hould feeme incredible not only to ftrangers but
alfo to the Icwes that would be accompted of the houfehold of God
addeth this reafon:becaufe the armc of God fhal not be reuclcd to all
men So oft thcrforc as the fmallneflTe of number of the bclcuers doth
trouble vs,on the other fide let vs call to mindc,th3f none can com-
prehcnde the miseries of God but they to whom it is giuen.
The viij. Chapter*
That fo farrt as mans reajun may beare^there are fufficient proues t»
jiabhsh the credit oj Scripture.
VNlefTe we hauc this aflurance^which is both more excellent &
of more force than any iudgcment of man , in vaine fhall the
authority of Scripture eyther be ftrengthencd with argu-
mentcs , or ftabliOied with confent of the church, or confir-
med with any other ineanes of defence. For vnlefTe this fundation be
byd , itftiU remayncch hanging in doute. As on the other fide
when exempting it from the common ftate of thinges, we haue em-
braced it deuouily and according to the worthineffe of it : then thefe
things become very fit hdpes, which before were butof fmall fmcc
to graftl* and faitcn the affurance thereof in our mindes. For it is mar-
uelous,how great cftabhlliemcnt growcth hereof, when with carncft
ftudy wcconfiderhowc ordcily and well framed a difpofition of the
diuine wifdom appearcth therein , how heauenly a dodrinc in cucry
place of ir,and nothing fauoring of earihlynelTejhow beautifull an a-r
grccment of all the partes among themfelucs, and fuch other thinges
as auaile to procure a maicfty to wrytings.But more perfc«^ly are our
hartcs confirmed when we confider,howc we are euen violently cari-
edtoan admiration of it rather with dignity of matter , than with
gr.ice of words.For this alfo was not done without the fingul.ir pro-
mdece of God, that the hye mifteries of the heaucly kingdom (hould
for the moft part be vttered vndcr a contemptible bafenes of wordcs,
leaft if it had bin beautified with more glorious fpeachethe wicked
fhould cauill thattheoncly force of eloquence doth raigne therein.
But when that rough and in a maner rude fimplicity doth raife vp a
C iij.
Cap. 8. Ofthe knowledge of
greater reucrencc of it felfe than any Rhetoricians eloquence , what
may we iudge, but that there is a more mighty ftregth of truth in the
holy Scripture , than that it ncdeth any art of wordes ? Not without
caufc therefore the Apoftle makcth his argument , to prouc that the
ror.a fjith ofthe Corinthians was grounded vpon the power of God and
not vpon mans wifdom , becaufe his preaching; amono them was fct
forth not with enticing fpech of mans vvifdom,but in plaine euidcncc
cf the fpinte and of power. For the trueth is then fette free from ail
douting , when not vpholden by foraine aides it fclfc alone fuffifcth
to fulUine it fclfe. But how this power is properly alone belonging to-
the Scripture, hereby appeareih, that of all the wryiinges of men,bc
they neucr fo cunningly t^arniOicd , no one is fo farre able to pcarcc
our aff'i djons. Read Demofthencs or Cicero,read Plato, AiiftcilcjOr
any other of- all that forte : I grauntthcy (hallmaruelouflyallure,de-
llte, mouc, and rauifh thee . But if from them thou come to this holy
reading of Scriptures, wilt thou or not,tt (hall fo liuely moue rhy .itlb-
ftjons, H fhall fo pearce thy hart, it lliallfo fettle within thy bones,
that in coparifon ofthe efficacy of this feeling, all that force of Rhe-
toricians and Phjlofophers ihnll in manner vanifh away : fo that it is
cafie to perceiue that the Scriptures , which do far excell all gifts and
graces of mans induftrie : do in d^cdQ breath out a certayne di-
uinitie.
2 T graunt in dcedc,that fom ofthe Prophets haue an elegat cleare
yea & a beautifull phrafe of fpeeche,fo as their eloquence giueth not
place to the prophane wryters:& by fuch examples it pkaltd the ho-
ly Ghoft to Hiew that he wanted not eloquence, though in the rell he
vfed a rude and groflc ftile.But whether a man reade Dauid,Efay, and
fuch hke,who haue a fwete and plcafant flowing fpeechjOr AmoSjthe
heardman, Hicremie and Zacharie, whofe rougher talke fauorcth of
countrcy rudeneflc : in cucry one of them fliall appcare that maicfty
ofthe holy Ghoft that I fpake of Yet am I not ignorac,that a? Sathan
is in many things a counterfaiter of God , that with dcceitfiill refem-
blance he might the better creepc into (implc mens mindes : fo hath
he craftily fpread abroadc with rude and in maner barbarous fpcech,
hole thofc wicked errours wherewith he deceiued fcly men , and hatli oft
'" ^ rimes vfed difcontinucd phrafeSjihat vnder fuch vifour he might hide
Hio
,1 his dcceires. But how vaine and vnclcanly is that curious counterfai-
ting, all men that haue but mcanc vnderftanding do plainely fee . As
for the holy Scriptnrc,although froward men labour to bite at many
thinges , yet is it full of fucii fent.nccs as could not be conceiucd by
man . Let all the Prophctcs be looked vpon , there fliall not one be
found
ooatnev^rcator. J^ib.i. 20
found among them, but he hath farre excelled all mans capacity , in
fuch force that thofe are to be thought, to haue no ludgemcnc ot taft
to whom their dodrine is vnlauoric.
g Other men hauc largely entreated of this argument,wherfore at
this time it fuffifeth to touch but a fcwethinges, thar chiefly make
for the principall fumme of the whole matter.Befide thefe points that
I haue already touchcd,the very antiquity of the Scripture is of great
weight. For how foeuerthe Greke wryters tell many fables of the JE-
gyptian diuinity : yet there remaincth no monument of any religion,
but that is farre inferiour to the age of Mofes . And Mofes deuifeth
not a new God, butfetteth foorth the fame thing which the Ifiac-
lites had receiued in long proccfle of timc,conueied to them by their
fathers as it were from hand to hand concerning the euerlalhng God.
For what doth he elfe but labour to call them backe to the couenaiint
made with Abraham . If he had brought a thing neuer hearde of be-
fore, he had had no entrie to begin. But it muft needs be that the de-
liueraunce from bondage, wherein they were deteyned , was a thing
well and commonly knowcn among them,fo that the hearing of the *
mention thereof did foorthwith raife vp all their mindes . It is alfo
likely that they were informed of the number of the CCCC. yeares.
Now it is to be confidered , if Mofes which himfelfe by fo long di-
ftance of time was before all other wryters , do from a beginning Co
long before himfelfe fetch the originall dehuerance of his dodrine:
how much the holy Scripture then is beyonde all other wrytinges in
antiquity.
4 Vnleflc perhappe fome lifte to bcleue the Egyptians , that
ftrctch their auncienty to Gkc thoufand yeares before the creation
of the world. But fich their vaine babbhng hath bin alway fcorned
euen of all the prophane wryters themfelues , there is no caufe why
I lliould fpend labour in confuting of it. But lofephus againft Ap-
pion, allcagethteftimonies worthy to beremembrcd outof aun-
cicnt wryters, whereby maybe gathered, that by confent of all
nations the dodrine thatis inthelawe hath bin famous euen from
theHrft ages, although it were neither redde nor truely knowen.
Nowjthat neither there fhould remaine to the malicious any caufe of
fufpicion , nor to the wicked any occafion to cauiU , God hath for
both thcfe daungers prouided good remedies. When Moifes rehcar-
feth what lacob almoft three hundred yeares before had by hcauen-
ly infpiration pronounced vpon his owne pofterity , how doth he fet
foorth his owne tribe ? yea in the perfon of Leui he (potteth it with Oe.4^.5
«ternall infamie. Symcon(fayth he) & Leui the vefl'els of wickedneffc
C iiij.
Cap. 8. Of the knowledge of
My loulc come not into their counfelljnor my couginco their fecrct.
Troely he might haue pafled oucr that blot with filence , in Co do.
ing not onely to pleafe his fathe.r , but alfo not to ftaine himfclfe and
his whole family with parte of the fame fhame . How can that wry-
tcr be fufpeded , which vnconftrainedly publirtiing by the oracle of
the holy Gholi; , tl^at the principall auncefter of the family whereof
himfclfe defcended was an abhominabie doer,neither priuately pro-
luded for his owne honor , nor rcfufed to enter in difplcafure of all
his owne kinfmen,whom vndoutedly this matter greued? When alfo
he reliearfeth the wicked murmuring of Aaron his owne brother, 8c
^ Mary his (ifter: fliall we fay that he (pake after the meaninge of the
fleHi, or radier that he wrote it obeying the commaundement of the
holy Ghofl: ? Moreouer fith himklfc was hyeft in authority, why did
he not leaue at leaft the office of the hye pricithode to his owne
fonnesjbut appointeth them to the baftft place ? 1 touche hete onely
2 fewthinges of many . But in the law it fclfe a man rtiall eche where
mete with many argumcntes that are able to bring full profe to make
men bcl^ue that Moifes without all queftion commeth from heauen
aSan AngcllofGod.
5 Now thefe fc many & fo notable miracles that he recomptcth,
arc eucn as many eftablifhments of the law that he deliuered,and the
ixo 14. dodrine that he publilhcd. For, this that he was caried in a cloude vp
**• into the mountaync : that there euen to the foretyeth day he conti-
_^ nued without company of men : that in the very publifhing of rhe
^^^ ' law his face did fhine as it were befette with fonnebeamcs : ih:<t iigh-
Exo.i5>. teninges ftaflied rounde about : that thunders and noifes were heardc
I tf. cche where in the ayre : that a trompette founded being not bio wen
txo.40 ^jjj^ gjjy mouth of man : that the entrie of the tabernacle by a cloude
fette betweene was kept from the fight of the people : that his autho-
^ ritv was fo miraculoufly reuenged with the horrible deftruftionof
1 * ' Chore , Dathan and Abiron , and all that wicked faction ; that the
N'u. 20. rocke ftriken with a rodde did byandby powre foorth a riuer : that at
JO. his prayer it raynedMnnna from heauen : did not God herein com-
Nu.11.5 rnende him from heauen as an vndouted Prophet ? If any man ob-
ied agaynft me, that I take theft thinges as confefled , which arc not
out ot controuerfie, it is eafie to anfwere this cauillation . For feeing
that Mofes in open aflembly published all thefe thinges , what place
was there tofayne before thofc witneffcs that had themfelucs feenc
the thinges done ? It isLkely forfooth that he would come amonge
thcm,& rebuking the people ofinfidelity,ftubbornes, vnthankfulnes
& other finnes , would haue bofted that his dodrine was eftabhlhed
in
vjoacne v>reaior. i-.iD.i. 21
^ in their own fight with fuch miracles, which in decde they neucr faw.
6 For this is alfo worthy to be noted, (o ofte as he telleth of any
miracles,he therwichallodioufly ioyneth fuch thinges as might ftirrc
the whole people to crie out agamll him , if there had bin neucr fo
litle occafion. Wherby appeareth,that they were by no other meanc
brought to agree vnto him , but bccaufe they were euer more than
fufficiently conuinced by their owne experience.But becaufe the mat-
ter was plamlier knowcn , than that the prophane coulde deny that
miracles were done by Mofesrthe father of lyeng hath miniftred them p •
another cauillation, faying that they were done by Magicall artes ,i.
and forcerie . But what likely proofc haue tliey to accufe him for a
forcerer,which fo farre abhorred from fuch fuperftition,that he com-
maundeth to ftone him to death,that doth but afke counfell of for- Leu. la
cerers and foothfaiers ? TrueJy no fuch deceiuer vfeth his iugglinge txo.id<
caftes, but that he ftudieth to amafe the mindes of the people to get
himfelfe a fame. But what doth Mofes? by this that he crieth out,chat
himfelfe and his brother Aaron are nothing , but doth onely execute
thofe thinges that God hath appointed , he doth fufficiently wipe a«
way all blottes of thinking euil of him.Now if the thinges thcmlelues
be confideredjwhatenchantement coulde bring to pafle that Manna
dayly raining from hcauen , (liould fuffife to fcede the people ? and if
any man keept in (lore more than his iufte meafure , by the very rot-
ting therof he fhould be taught , that God did punifh his want of be-
Itefc ?Befide that,with many great proues God fuftred his feruaunt Co
to be tried , that now the wicked can nothing preuayle with prating
againft him. For how oft did fometimc the people prowdely and im-
pudently make infurredions, fometime diuers of them confpirynga-
mong them felues wente about to ouerthrow the holy feruaunt of -
God : how could he haue begyled their furour with illu(Tons ? And
the end that folo wed plainly fheweth, that by this meane his dodrine
was ftabhfhed to continue to the ende of all ages.
7 Moreouer where he affigneth the chiefe gouernement to the
tnbc of luda in the perfbne of the Patriarch Jacob, who can denie Geii.4f
that this was done by fpirite of prophecie, fpecially if we wey in con-
fideratio the thing it felfe,how in commyng to pafTe it proued true?I-
magine Mofes to haue bin the firft author of this prophecie:yct from
the time that he did firft put it in writing , there paffed fower hundred
yesres wherein there was nomencion of thefceptrein the tribe of
luda . After Saule was confccrate king , it Teemed that the kingdom
fhould reft in the tribe ofBen;amin . When Dauid wasannointed by Sam.ir.
Samuel, what rcafon appeared there why the courfc bf inberitaunce 15.
v^ap.o. \jr tne Kiiowieage or
'9m, 1 6 of the kingdome fliould be chaunged ? wlio would haue looked that
there (hould haue come a king out of the bafe houfe of a herdman >
And when there were in the fame houfe feuen brethren , who would
haue faid that that honour fliould light vpon the yongeft ? By wliat
meane came he to hope to be a king? who can fay that this annoint-
ment was gouerned by any artjtrauaile or policie of man , and not ra-
ther that it was a fulfilling of the hcauenly prophccie? Like wife thofe
thinges that Mofes afore fpeaketh , albeit darkely, concerning the
Gentiles to be adopted into the conucnaunt of God, feing they came
to pafle almoft two thoufand ycres after , do they not make it plainc
that he fpake by the infpiration of God ? I ouerf kip his other tel-
hnges afiorehand of thinges, which do fo euidently fauoure of the re-
)eurer. u^l^^'on of God, that all men that haue their founde wit may plainly
[2. perceiuc that it isGod that fpeaketh.To be (hortcthat fame one fong
of his, is a clere looking glallejwherin God euidently appeareth.
8 But in the other prophetes the fame is yet alfo much more
plainely feene. I will choofe out only a few examples, becaufe to ga-
ther them all together were to greate a laboure. When in the time of
Efaie the kingdom of luda was in peace, yea when they thought that
the Chaldees were to them fome ftay and defence,then did Efaie pro-
phccie of the deftrudion of the citie and exile of the people. But ad-
mitte that,ycr this was no token plaine enough of the inftindof God,
to tell long before of fuch thinges as at that time feemed falfe , and
afterward proued true : yet thofe prophecies that he vttereih con-
-f«' A5« ccrning their delyueraunce , whenfe fhall we fay that they proceded
but from God ? He nameth Cyrus by whom the Chaldees lliould be
fubdued,and the people reftcred to libertie . There pafTcd more than
a hundred yeares from the time that Efaie fo prophecied before that
Cyrus was borne:for Cyrus was borne in the hundreth yeare or ther-
aboutes after the death of Efaie.No man could then gcffe that there
fhould be any fuch Cyrus,that (hould haue warre with the Babylonias,
that fhould bring fubied fo mightie a monarchic vnder his domini5,
and make an ende of the exile of the people of Ifraell . Doth not this
bare tellyng without any garnifhment of woides euidently (hew,that
the thinges that Efaie fpeaketh, are the vndoubted oracles of God,
^g J. and not the coniedures of men? Again, when leremie a little before
I, that the people was caried awaie,did determine the ende of the capti-
uitie within threfcore and tenne yeares , and promifed returne and li-
bertie,muft it not necdes be that his tongue was gouerned by the fpi-
ritc of God ? What fhamelefnefle fhall it be to dcnie, that the credite
ifa. 4*- of the prophetes was ftablifhed by fuch proues,& that the fame thing
was
.was fulfilled in dede, which they them felues do reporte to make their
fayinges to be beleued?Bcholde,the former thmgesare come to pafle,
and new thinges do I declare : before they come forth , I tell you of
them . I leaue to fpcake how Hieremie and Ezechiell beyngfo farrc
afonder, yet prophecyingboth at one time, they fo agreed m all their
fayinges as if either one of them had endited the wordes for the other
to write. What did Daniel ? Doth he not write continuing prophe-
cies of thinges to come for the fpace of fixe hundred yeares after , in
fuch forte as if he had compiled an hiftoric of thinges already done
and commonly knowen ? Thefe thinges if godly men haue well con-
fidered , they fliall be fufficiently well furniflied, to appeafe the bar-
kingcs of the wicked . For the plaine proofe hereof is to cleare to be
fubied to any cauillations at all.
9 I know what fome learned men do prate in corners, to fhew the
quickntflTe of their witte in affahyng the truth of God. For they de-
mande , who hath afiiired vs that thefe thinges which are red vnder
title of their names , were euer written by Mofes and the prophetes.
Ye3,they arc fo hardy to moiie this quelboj whetiier euer there were
any fuch Mofes or no . But if a manne fhould call in doubt whether
euer there were any Plato,or Arirtotlcjor CiccrOjwho would not fay,
that fuch madnclTe were worthy to be correded with ftrokes and
ihypes ? The law of Mofes hath bin meruayloufly prefcrued rather
by heauenly prouidcnce then by diligence of men. And though
by the negligence of the Prieltes it laic buried a littell while : yet fins
the lime that the godly king lofias found it, it bath ihll by continuall
fucccilion fromage toagc bin vfed in the handes of men. Neyther
did lofias bring It forth as an vnknowen or new thing,but fuch a thing
as had bin euer commonly publidied, and wherof the remembrauncc
was at that time famous . The originall bookc it felfe was appointed
to be facredly kept in the temple, and a copie written out thereof, to
remaine with the keepers of the kinges Recordes.Only this had hap-
pened , that the Prieftes had ceafTed to publifh the law according to
the old accuftomed maner, and the people them felues had negledcd
their wounted reading of it.Yea there in maner pafTed no age wherin
the eftablifhmenttherofwas not confirmed andrenued? They that
had Dauid in their handes,knew they not of Mofes? But to fpeake of
them all at ones , it is moft certaine that their writings came to pofte-
ritie none otherwife but from hand to hand ( as I may terme it ) by
continuall orderly courfe of yeres deliuered from their fathers, which
had partly heard them fpeake,& partly while the remembraunce was
freflj of it,did lerne of them which herd them that they had fo fpokcn.
v^ap.o. v^r cne Knowieagc or
lo As for that which they obied out of the hiftorie of the Ma-
' **^'* chabeesjto mmifh the crediie of fcriptur Cjit is fuch a thing as nothing
can be dcuifed more fitte to ttabhfh the fame. But firft let vs wipe a-
way the colour that they by vpon it , and then let vs turne vpon them
». Mac. ^<^'"" ^'^€ engine that they raife vp againft vs. When Antiochus ( faic
1.5^. they) commauiidcd all the bookes to be bourned, whence are come
theie copies that we now haue ? On the other fide I afkc them , in
what filop they could fo fone be made r It is cuident , that after the
crucltie appeafed they were immediatly abrode again,and were with-
out controuerfy knowcn to be the fame of all godly men,that haumg
bin brought vp in the dodrine of them did famdiarly know them. Yea
when all the wicked men beyng as it were confpircd togither , did in-
folently triumphe with reproches vpo the Icwes, yet neuer was there
any that durft lay to their charge falfe changing of their bookes. For
what focuer they thinke the Icwes rehgion to be, yet Ihll they thinke
Mofes to be the authour of it.What then do thefe praters els,but be*
wraic their owne more then doggifh frowardcnefle, while they falfe-
ly fay that thefe bookes are chaunged , and ncWpuc in their places,,
whofe facred antiquitie is approued by confenteof allhiftories? But
to fpende no more labour vainly in cofuting fuch fooliih cauillations:
let vs rather hereby conGdcv how great a care God had for the prc-
feruation of his word,when beyonde the hope of all men, he faued it
from the outrage of the moft cruell tyrant , as out of a prefent fire:
that he cndewed the godly prieftes and other with fo great coftancie,
that they fticked not to redceme this booke euen with loflc of their
life if needc were, and fo to conucy it oucr to pofteritie : that he diC-
appointed the narow fcarch of fo many goucrnours and fouldiours.
Who can but acknowledge the notable and miraculous woorke of
Godjthat thefe facred monumetcs which the wicked verely thought
to haue binvtterly dcftroyed , byandby came abroadc againe as fully
rcftored , and that with a greate deale more honour . For byandby
folowed the tranflating of them into Greke,to publifh them through-
out the world. And not in this only appeared the miraculous woor-
kingjthat God preferued the tables of his couenaunt from the bloudy
proclamations of Antiochus : but alfo that among fo manyfold mi-
lerable afflidions of the Icwcs,whcrwith the whole nation was fom-
time worne to a fewe and wafted,and laft of all, brought in maner to
vtter deftrudion, yet they remained ftill fafe and extant. The Hebrue
tongue lay not only vnefteemed , but almoft vnknowen. And furely
had not bin Gods pleafure to haue his religion prouided for , it had
peiirtied altogether. For how much the lewcs that were lince their
recouro?
God the Creator. Lib.i. 23
rctournc from exile, were fwarued from the naturall vfe of their mo-
ther tongue,appeareth by the Pro{>hetes,that iiued in that age,which
is therefore worthy to be noted , bccaufe by this comparifon the an-
tiquitie of the law and the prophetes is the more plainely pcrccyued.
And by whom hath God prclerued for v$ the dodrinc of faluaiion
conteyned in the law and the propheies,to the end that Chrift might
in his appointed time be openly ihewed ? cuen by the moft cruelly
bente enemies of Chrift , the lewes , whom Saind Augufline doeth
therefore woorihyly call the keepers of the Librarie of Chriftian
Church, bccaufe they hauc miniftred vnto vs thatching, toreadc
wherof , themfclues hauc no vfc.
II Now if we come to the new Tcftamcnt , with how foundc
pillers is the trueth thereof vphoKlen? The three Euangchftcs write
the hiftoric in bafe and fimple fpeach.Manie prowde mennc do loi th
that limphcitic , bccaufe they take no heede to the chicfe pointes of
dodrine thcrinjwhereby it were eafie to gather,that they entreate of
heauenly mifteries abouc mannes capacitie. Surely who fo euer hauc
but one droppe ofhoneftfhame willbcafhamed iftheyreade the
firft chapter of Luke. Now,the fermons of Chrift,the fummc wherof
IS {hortly comprifed bythefe three Euangeliftes , do cafely deliuer
their writinges from all contempte. But Ihon thundering from on
hie.thofe whom he copelleth not to obedience of faith, he throwcth
downe their ftubbourneflfe more mightily than any thuderbolt. Now
let come forth all thefe fharpnofedfeultfindcrs,thathaue a great plea-
fiire to (hake the reuercnce of fcripturc out of their ownc and other
mens heartes, let them readelohnsGofpell: Will they or no , they
fhail there finde a thoufande fentences that may at leaft awaken their
fluggirtienefle , yea that may printe a horrible brande in their con-
fcienccs to reftraine their lawghyng . The fame is to bee thought of
Peter and Paul, in whofc writings although the more part be blinde,
yet the very heauenly maieftic in tjicm holdeth all men bounde , and
as it were faft tied vnto it.But this one thing doth fufficxently aduancc
their doftrine aboue the world, thatMathew being before all gcuen
to the gaine of his money boorde , Peter & lohn brought vp in their
fiOier boates, all grofle vnlearned men, had learned nothing in mens
fchoole that they might dehuer toother. Paule , not onely from a
profefl'ed, but alfo from a cruell and blouddy enncmy conuerted co a
new man, with fodaine and vnhoped chaunge doeh lliew , that being
compelled by heauenly authoritie he now maintaineth that dodrine,
which before he had fought agiinft.Now let thefe dogges denie,thac
the holy Ghoft came downc vpon the Apoftles,or let them difcreditc
Cap,
^ >. 8. Of the knowledge of
the hiftorie : yet ftill the trueth it feife openly crieth out , that they
were taught by the holy Ghoft, which beyng^before time defpifed
men among the ra( kail people , fodcinly began fo glorioufely to en-
treate of heauenly oiiitcries.
1 z Theire be yet alfo furthermore many very goo d reafons , why
the confente of the Church fhould not be efteemed without weight.
For it is to be accompted no fmalle matter,that fins the Scripture was
hrtt publifhed , the willes of fo many ages haue conftantly agreed to
obey It. And that how foeuer Sathan with all the wo ride hath tra-
uayled by maruaylous meanes, either to oppreife it , or ouerthrow it,
or vtterly to bloite and deface it out of mcnnes remembraunce , yet
cuer ftill hke a palme tree, it hath rifen vp aboue,and remained inuin-
cible. For there hath nothghtly bin in old time any fophifter or Rhe-
torician that had any more excellet wit than other,but he hath bentc
his force againft this Scripture : yet they all haue nothing preuayled.
The whole power of the earth hath armed it felfe to deftroy it, and
yet all their enterprifes arc vanifhed a wayjas in fmoke. How coulde it
haue refiited being fo mightyly on eche fide-afTailed , if it hadde had
none other defence but mannes ? Yea rather it is hereby proued, that
it came from God himfelfe, that all the traiiailes of men ftnuing a-
gainft it, yet it hath of her owne power ftill rifen vp . Befide that , not
one citie alone,nor one onely nation hath agreed to receiue and em-
brace it : but fo farre as the woiidc extendeih in length and breadth,
the Scripture hath atteined her creditc,by one holy corifpiracie of di-
uers nations , which ochei wife were in nothing agreable one with an
other. And forafmuch as fuch agreement of mindcs fo diuers and dif-
agreyng in maner in all thingcs elles , ought much to moue vs, bc-
caufe it appeareth , that the fame is brought about none other way,
bat by working of the heauenly maieftic : no fmall eftimatio growetlv
vnto it, when we beholde their godlinefle, that do fo agree, I meane
not of them all,but only of thofejWith whom as with hghtes it plea-
fed God to haue his Church to fliine.
1 3 Now' with what afiTurednefle of minde ought we to fubmittc
vs to that dodrinc which we fee ftabiifhed and witnefTed with the
bloude of fo many holy menne^They when they had but ones recea-
ued itjfticked not boldely witlioutfeare, yea and with great chereful-
neffe to dip for it : how ihould it then come to paflcithat we, hauing it
conueycd to vs with fuch an aflurcd pledge, (hould not with certamc
and vnmouable perfuafion take holde of it? It is therfore no fmall c5-
firmarion of the Scripture^that it hath bin fealed with the bloud of fo
many witnefle$,fpecially when we confidcr that they fuffred death to
bearc
God the Creator. Lib.i. 24
bearc witnefle of their faith : and not of a frentike diftemperaunce of
br»ine,as fometime the erroneous fpirites arc wont to do, but with a
firme and conftant and yet fobre zeale of God. There be other rea-
fons and thofe not fewe nor v/eake , whereby the Scripture hath her
dignitic and maieftie not onely afcertained vnto godly naites, but alfb
honourably defended againft the fubtiltics of cauillers , yet be they
fuch as be not of them felues fufficiently auaylable to bring ftedfaft
credite vnto it, vntill the heauenly father difclofing therin hismaic-
ftie, doth bring the reuerence therof out of all controuerfic. Wher-
fore then onely the fcripture fhall fuffifeto that knowledge' W God
that bringeth faluation, when the certaintie therof (hall be grounded
vpon the mwarde perfuafion of the holy Ghoft.So thofe telhmonies
of men that fcrue to confirmc it fhall not be vainCjif as feconde helpes
of our weakneflTe they follow that chiefe & hyeft teftimony.But they
do fondly that willhaue it perfwaded byproofeto the vnfaitbfull,
that the fcripture is the woorde of God , which can not be knowen
but by faith. For good reafon thcrfore doth Auguftine geue warning, Devti-
that godhnefle and peace of mindeought to go before^to make a man Ii"ce
vndci ftand fome what of fo greate matters. credcn-
Thc ix. Chapter.
That thofe fanaticaU metty which forfaking Scriptt4re,refirt vnto rcHtUtitn^
d» ouerthrovv all the principles of godUneJft,
NOw they that forfaking the Scripture do imagine I vrote
not what waie to attaine vnto God , are to be thought noc
fo much to be holden with crrour, as to be caricd with rage.
For there haue arifen of late certaine giddy brained men,
which moft prcfumptuoufly pretending a fchoole of the fpirite, both
them felues do forfake all reading, & allfo do fcorne their Umplicitie
which ftill follow the dead & flaying ietter,as they call it.But I would
faine know of thefe men, what fpiritc that is , by whofe infpiration
they are caried vp fo hie , that they dare defpife the doftrinc of the
Scripture as childifli and bafe.For if they aunfwere that it is the fpiritc
of Chrift , then fuch carelcfnefTe is woorthy to be laughed at. For I
thinke they will graunte, that the Apoftles oi Chrift and other faith-
full in the primiciue Church were lightned with none other fpirite.
But none of them did learne of that fpirite to defpife the word ofGod:
but rather cucry one was moued more ro reuereceit,as their writings
do moft plaincly witnefle. And furtly fo was it foretold by the mouth
of Efaie . f^or where he faith , My fpirite that is vpon thee , and my Er<t. 5>,
wordcs which I haue put in thy mouth , fliall not deparie out of thy **•
Cap .p. Of the knowledge of
mouth,nor out of the mouth of thy feede for euer: he doth not bindc
the old people to the outwarde dodiine as though they were fct to
learnc to fpclle, but rather he teacheth,that this (hall be the true and
perfed felicitie of the new church vnder the reigne of Chrift , that it
ihall no lefle be leddc by the voice of God, tha by the /pirite of God.
Wherby we gather, that thefe lewde menne with wicked facrilege do
fcuer afunder thofc thinges that the Prophet hath ioyned with an
inuiolable knotte.Moreouer,Paule bcyng rauifhed vp into the thirdc
heau^i;!, yet ceafTed not to go forward in the dodrine of the law and
. Tim, the Prophetes, euen fo as he exhorteth Timothe, a dodour of fin-
^■ > }' gular excellence to apply reading. And worthy is that comcndation
to be remembred , wherwith he fetteth forth the Scripture j faying,
I. Tim. that it is piofitable to teach,to adrr.onifii and to reproucjthat the fcr-
\'^^' uauntes of God may be made perfcd.Howdiuelillia niadnclTe is it to
faine, that the vfe of Scripture is but tranlitorie, and lafteth but for a
while , which in deede guideth the children of God euen to the laft
ende ? Againe , 1 would haue them aunfwere me this : whether they
haue taftcd of an other fpirite than that , which the Lord promifed to
his difciples . Although they be vexed with extreme madneflfe , yet I
thinke they are not caried with fuch giddinelTe , that they dare fo
boart. But what mancr of fpirite did he fpeake of in his promife?euen
* • that fpirite which fhould not fpeake of it felfcjbut (hould minifter and
infpire into their mindes thofe thinges which he the Lord himfclfc
had taught by his worde . It is not therfore the ofhce of the fpirite
which is promifed vs, to faine new and vnhearde of reuelations, or to
coine a new kinde of dodrine, whereby we (liould be led from the re-
ceiued dodrine of the G<^peII, buttofealein our mindes the felfc
fame dodrine that is commended vnto vs by tlie Gofpell.
z Whereby we plainly vnderflandjthat we ought right ftudioufly
to apply the reding and hearing of the Scripture, if wehft to take any
Pct.i. ^^^ ^^^ fruite of the fpirite of God . As alfo Peter praifeth their di-
o. hgence that are hedcfull to the dodrine of the Prophetes , which yet
might feme to haue geucn place after therifing of the light of the
Gofpell. On the other fide if any fpirite leauing iht wifdom of the
word of God doth thruft vnto vs an other dodrine, that the fame fpi-
rite ought rigbtefuUy to be fufpedcd of vanitie and lying . For what ?
when Sathantransformeth himfelfc into an aungell of lieht, what
crcditc ftial the holyGhoft haue amog vs,if it be not feuerally knowcn
by fomc afl'ured marke ? And truely it hath bin plainely pointed out
vnto vs by the worde of the Lord, but that thefe miferable men do
willingly couetc to erre to their owne deftrudion, while they feeke a
fpirite
God the Creator. Lib.i. 25
fpiritc rather from them fclues than from him.Biu(rny they) it is dil-
honorable, that the fpirite of God, whom all thmges ought to obey,
{hould befubicdto the Scripture. As if this were a difiionour to the
holy Ghoft to be euery where egall and like to it fclie , to agree with
it felfe in all thinges, and no where to varie . In deede if it were to be
tried by the rule cither of men,or of angels, or any others rule whst-
foeuer, then it might wtll be thoughtjthat it were brought into obe-
dience,or if ye lift fo to terme it,into bondage.But when it is compa-
red with ic felfe, when it is coniidercd in it felfe,who can therfoi e fiy,
that there is any wrong done vnto it ? But thus it is brought to triall. I
graunt , but fuch a trial! wherewith it was his owne pleafure to hauc
his maiertie cftabhdied. It ought to content vs fo foone as he entreth
into vs. But left vnder his name the Ipirite of Sathan fhould crcepe in,
he wii haue vs to know him by that image of him {elfe,which he hath
printed in the Scriptures. He is the authour of the Scriptures : he can
not be diuers and vnlike him felfe. Therefore it muft needcs be, that
he continually rcmaine fuch as he hath fhewcd him felfe rherin. This
is no diHionor vnto him , vnlcflTe perhappc we count it honorable to
fwarue and go out of kinde from hirafclfe.
3 Whcras they cauill that we reft vpo the letter that fleieth,hcrein 2. Cor.
they fuffer puni/hement for defpifing of the Scripture. For it is plainc 6.
enough that Paule there contendeth againft the falfc Apoftles,which
commending the law without Chrift did call away the people fiom
the benefiteof the newTeftament , wherin the Lord doth couenanc
that he will graue his law within the bowels of the faithful!, and write
it in their hartes. The letter therfore is dead, and the law of the Lord
killeth the readers of it , when it if? feuered from the grace of Chrift,
and not touching the heart, only foundeth in the eares. But if it be ef-
fedually printed in our hartes by the holy Ghoft, if it prefent Chrift
vnto vs:thenisitthe worde ot life,conueriing foulcs,geuingwifdom
to little ones.&c. Alfo in the fame place the Apoftlecalleth his prea- 2.Cor.j
ch'ng the minifterie of the holy Ghoft:meaning that the holy Ghoft 8*
doth fo ftickc faft in his truth which he hath exprcfled in the Scrip-
tures ) that then only he putteth forth and difplaieth his force, when
the Scripture hath her due reucrence and dignitie. And it difigiccth
not herewith which I before faid , that the worde it felfe is not much
aflured vnto vs,vnlefle it be c6 firmed by y vitneife of the holy Ghoft.
For with a certainemutuall knot the Lord hath coupled together the
aflliraunce of his worde and of his fpiiite,fo that perre<5l r cuercnce to
the word doth then fettle in our mindes whe the holy Ghoft Ihineth
vpon vs to make vs tlierin beholde the face of God : and on the other
D .
Cap,
10. • Of the knowledge of
litie without all fearc of being deceiued wc do em brace y holy Ghoft
when we reknowledge him in his owne image , that is in his wordc.
Thusitis vndoutediy: God brought not abrode his worde among
mc for a fodeine {lieW:,meaning at the comming of his fpirite by and
by to take Jt awny agsin , but he after fent the fame fpirite with whofc
power he had diftributedhis worde, to make an ende of his worke
, with efffdual contirmacion of his wordc.In this forte Chrift opened
_^* the miiidcs of the two difciplcs , not that they (hould caft away the
Scriptures and vaxe wile of themfelues , but that they (hould vnder-
y, ^ibnd the Scriptures. Likewife Paule when he exhorteth theThef-
.19. * ^''•lonians not to extinguifh the fpirite , doth not cary them vpon hie
to vaine fpeculations without the worde, bur by and by faith further,
that prophecies are not to be dcfpifed:wherbywichout dout is meant,
that the light of the fpirite is choked vp fo Tone as prophecies come
to be dcfpifed. Wh^^t fay thefe proudely fwclling men , rauiflied with
the fpirite, to thefe thinges,which reckcn this only to be an excellent
illumination jW hen carelefly forfaking and faying farewell to the word
of God , they both boldly and rafhly do take holde of all that they
haue conceiued in their flcepe.Truely a farre other fobrietie becom-
meth the children of God : which as they fee that without the fpirite
of God they are voide of all light of trueth,fo do they know that the
worde is the inftrument wherwith the Lord diftributeth to the faith-
full the light of his fpirite. For they know none other fpirite but that
which dwelte and fpake inthe Apoftles, bywhofe oracles they arc
continually called to the hearing of the worde.
The X. Chapter,
That the Scripture, to correEi all fttperfticion, doth in comparifon fet the
true God againfi all the gods of the Gentiles , reckoning
him for none of them.
Vt becaufe we haue (hewcd,that the knowledge of God which'
in the frame of the world and all the creatures is fomewhat
plainely Ctt forth , is yet more familiarly and plainely declared
m the worde: now is it good to confider, whether the Lord
fhew himfelfe fuch in the Scripture as it pleafed him fiift to be repre-
Jfcntedinhisworkes. Butiniallatthistimc be contented onely to
poinr vnto it,wherby the godly mindes being admonifhed may know
what IS chiefely tobefearched in t e Scriptures concerning God^and
be directed to one cercaine marke in their fcking. I do not yet touch
the peculiar conuenaiuc, whcrbyGod feuered the ilockc of Abraham
from other nations.For eueii then he appeared the rcdemer in rccey-
uing
God the Creator. Lib.i. 26
uing to his children by free adopcion thofe that before were cnne-
mies. But we are yet about that knowledge that rcftcth in the crcatio
of the worlde and afcendeth not to Chnft the mediatcisr . And al-
though byandby it fhalbe good to allege certaine places out of the
new Tcftament, forafmuch as euen out of it both the power of God
the.Creator and his promdence in preferuing of the fi: ft nature is sp-
proued , yet I warne the readers before , what is now my pu; pou- to
do, to the ende that they pafle not the appointed boundes. So for fhis
prefenr, let it fuffice vs to learne, how God the maker of heaucn and
earth doth gouerne the worlde by him created. Euery where is reno-
med both his fatherly bountie and enclined will to do goodjand there
are alfo excmples rehearfed of his fciieritie , which fhew him to be a
rightcou5>punifherofwickeddoinges,fpecially where his fuftcrauncc
nothing preuailcth with the obftinnte.
z 3n certaine places are fct forth more plaine defcriptions whcrin
his naturall face is as in an image rcprefenied tobefeen. For m the Exo.j4
place wher Mofes defcribeth it,it femeth that his meaning was ihort 6.
ly to comprehende all that was lawfull for men to vnderftand of God.
The Lord f fayeth he) the Lord, a mercyfull God , and gracious, pa-
ciente and of much mercy.and true,which keepeft mercy, vnto thoui
fandes which takeft away iniquitie and wicked doinges , before whom
the innocente Hiall not Ife innocent , which rendreft the wickednelle
of the fathers to the children and childrens children. Where let v$
marke, that his eternitie & being of himfelfe is expreifed in the twife
repeting of that honorable name: and that then his vertues are re-
hearfed , in which is dcfcribed vnto vs , not what he is in refped to
himfclfe,but what a one he is towarde vs :that this knowledge of him
may rather ftand in a liuely feling, than in an empty and fupernaturall
fpeculation. And here we do heare recited thofe vertues of his which
we noted to fhine in the heauen and earth , that is to fay, demencie^
bountie, mercie, iuflice, judgement and trueth For might and power
are conteined vnder this name Elohim God.With the fame names of
addition do the Prophetes fet him forth when they meane fully to
paint out his holy name. But, becaufe I would not heape vp to many
examples together, atthis prefcntlet one Pfalme fuffice vs , wherin Pfa.i4s
the fumme of all his vertues is fo exactly reckened vp , that nothing J-
can fceme to be omitted. And yet is nothing there reharfed , but that
which wernay beholdein his creatures. Soplainely do we perceiiie
God by informacion of exper!ece,to be fuch as he declareth himfelfe
in his worde. In leremie where he pronounceth,what a one he would j.. ^
kaue vs know him to be, he fetteth forth a defcription not altogether a ^.
D .j.
Cap. 10. Of the knowledge of
fo full, but yet comming all to one eftcd. He that giorycth/aieth he,
let him glory in this that he knoweth me to be the Lord thiit do mei-
cie,viftice,and iudgement on the earth. Surely thefe three thingcs arc
very necelTary for vs to ^nowimercVjin which alone conlifteth all our
faluacion; Iudgement, v*'hich is dayly executed vpon euill doers, and
more greuous IS prepared for them to eternall dcthudion : lulhce,
whcrby the faithful are preferued and moft tenderly chenflied.Whicb
thingcs when thou haft conceiued, the prophecy faith thou haft fuffi-
ciently enough wherof thou maieft glory in God . And yet here are
not omitted cither his trueth or his power, or his hohncHe or good-
neiTe. For how fliould the knowledge ftand fure which is here requi-
red of his iuftice,mercy and iudgemenrjvnleflTe it did reft vpon his vn-
mouable trueth ? And how fhould we beleue thai he doeth gouerne
the earth with iuftice & iudgementjbut vnderftading his power ? And
whence cometli his mercy but of his goodnefte ? If then all his waies
be mercy5iudgemerit and iuftice, in them muft holinefl'e alfo nedes be
feen. And to none other end is diredcd that knowledge of God that
is fet forth vnto vs in the Scriptures,tha is that knowledge alfo which
appeareth emprintedin his creatures,that is to fay:it firft moueth vs to
the feare of God , and then to put confidence in him, to the ende we
may learnc firft :o honor him with perfect innocency of hfe and vn-
fained obedi<rnce,and then to hang aliogetlter vpon his gcodnefle.
^ Bat here I meane to gather a fumme of generall doctrine. And
firft let the readers note,that the Scripture to the ende to dired vs to
the true God, doth exprefly exclude and caft away all the gods of the
Gentiles, becaufe commonly in a manner in all ages religio hath bin
corrupted. True it is in decde that the name of one God was euery
where knowenand renomed. For eucn they that worfhipped a great
nomber of gods , fo oftastheydidfpeake according to the proper
fenfe of nature , they fimply \Ccd the fingular name of God as if they
were contented with pne God alone. And this was wifely marked by
luftme the Martyr, which for this purpofe made a booke of the Mo-
narchie of God, where-by many teftimonies he fheweth that thiSjthat
there IS but one God,was engrauen in the hartes of all me. The fame
thing «lfo doth Tertulliane proue by the common phrafe of fpeacli.
But forafmuch as all without exception are by their owne vaaitic ei-
ther drawen or fallen to falfe forged deuifes , and fo their fenfes are
becgroe vaine,therefore all that euer they naturally vnderftode of the
b'- mg but one God,auaiied no further but to make them inexcufable.
For euen thewjfeftofthcm doplainelyfliew the wandering error of
their minde, when they wiih fome god to aflift them , and fo in their
prayers
God the Creator. Lib.r. 27
prayers do call vponvncercainc gods. Morcouer in this that they
imagined God to haue many natures although they thought fome-
what Idle abfurdely than the rude people did oflupiter. Mercury,
Venus, Minerua and other : yet were they not free from the deceites
of Satan, and as we haue already fayrd els where , whatfoeuer wayes
of efcape the Philofophers haue fuctelly inuented^they cannot purge
themfelues of rebellion but that they all haue corrupted the trueth of
God.For this refon,Habacuc after he had condemned all idolcs bid- Hab.a^
dethto fekeGod in his owne temple , that the faithfull fliouldnot
admit him to be any other than fuch as he had difclofed him felfc by
his worde.
The xj. Chapter.
That it is vnlavvfull to attribute vnto God a v'Jible forme, and that
generaliy thty fcrfakj God , fo many as do trcU to
themfelues any images,
BVt as the Scripture prouiding for the rude and grofife wit of ml
vleth to fpeake after the common maner : fo when it meaneth
to make feuerally knowcn the true God from the falfe gods , it
chiefly compareth him with idoles:not that it doth allow thefe
inuentions th^t are more futtelly and finely taught by the Philofo-
phers , but the plainlier to difdofe the folifhnefle of the world, yea ra-
ther their madneffe in feking God fo long as they cleaue euery one
to their owne imaginations. Therfore that exclufiue definition which
we commonly hearCjbringeth to nought all that maner of Godhead
that men frame to themfelues by their owne opinion , becaufe God
himfelfe is the onely conueniente witnefiTe of himfdfe . In the meanc
time , fith this brutifh groffeneffe hath poliefied the whole world , to
couet vifible (hapes of God, and fo to forge thertifelues Gods of tim-
ber,ftone,goldejfiiuer5& other dead and corruptible matter,we ought
toholde this principle, that with wicked falQiod the glorie of God is
corrupted fo oft as any fhape is fained to reprefent him. Therefore
God in the law, after he had once chalcnged the glory of his deitie to
himfelfe alone , meaning to teache vs what manne . oi worfhipping
him he alowethor refufeth,addeth immediatlycThouflialtmake thee Exo.sc
no grauen image,nor any fimilitude,in which woordes he reftraineth 4»
our hbertie, that we attempt not to reprefent him with any vifible
image. And there he fhortly reckneth vp all the formes wherwith of
long time before,fupcrftici6 had begon to turne his trueth into lying.
For we know that the Pcrfians worfhipped the fonne,yea and fo many
ilarres as the foliih naiios faw in the f kie, fo many goddes they fained
b iij.
1X1
s
IICUS
mo-
v>ap.i I . Kji me Knowieage or
i' them. And fcarce was there any huing creature which was not amog
J ■ the Egjptians a figure of God. But the Grecians were thought to be
wifer than the reft , becaufe they worlliipped God in the fhape of a
manne.But God compareth not images one with an oiher,as though
5 8. one were more and an other lefTe mete to be vfedjbut without any ex-
ception lie reiedeth all images, pidurcs and other fignes , wherby the
fiaperftitious thought ro haue God ncre vnto them.
^'^' 1 This is {:?Xy to be gathered by thereafons which he ioyneth
to the prohibition. Firft with Mofes. Remember that the Lord hath
Ipoken to thee in the vale of Horeb. Thou heardeft a voiccjbut thoii
(aweft no body. Therefore take hcde to thy felfe, leaft paraduenturc
thou be deceiued and make to thy felfc any IikenefTe.&c.We fee how
openly God fettech his voice againft all counterfaitc fliapes , that we
may know that they fori'ake God whofbeuer do couet to hauc vifi-
'• ■* '; blc formes of him . Of the Prophetes onely Efay fhalbe enough
g, which ipeaketh oft and much hereof, to teachc that the maieftie of
.9. & God is defiled with vncomely and fohili conttrfaitmg, whc he being
.5« without body is likened to bodily matter : being inuifible,to a vifible
image : being a fpiritc, to a thing without hfe : being incomprehen-
(ible, ro a fmali lompc of umber, ftone or golde. In like manner rea-
i. 1 7. /bneth Paule: For afmuch as we are the generacion of God,we ought
not to thinke that the godhead is like vnto gcide , or (iluer or ftone
graucn by art and the inuentionof man. Vvheiby it certainclyap-
pearethjwharfoeuer images are eredtdor piduces painted to exprcifc
the ftiape of God , they fimply difpleafe him as certainc diftionors of
his maieftie. And what maruel is it if the holy GhoU do thonder out
tnefe oracles from heauen, fith he compelleth the very wretched and
•blinde idolaters themfelues to confefle this in earth ? It is knowen
g ^g how Seneca complained as it is to rcade in Auguftine.They dedicate
li.dei (faith he) the holy immortall and inuiolable Gods inmoftvileand
p. xo. bafe ftuffcjand put vpon them the fhapes of men & beaftes,and fomc
of them with kinde of man and woman mingled together , and with
fondryftiapen bodies , and fuch they call Gods which if they fhould
receiue brerh and mete them would be reckened monfters. Wherby
agame plainly appeareth , that it is a fonde cauillacion wherewith the
defenders of images feke to efcape, which fay that the lewes were for-
bidden images.becaufe they were inclinable to fuperftitio. As though
that thing pcrteined to one nation onely which God bringeth forth
of his eternall being and the continuall order of nature . And Paule
rpake not to the lewfs but to the Athenienfes when he confuted
their error in concci failing a fiiape oi God.
5 God
Cjod the Creator. Lib.i. 28
5 God in dede, I gr^iunt , fomedme in certaine hgnes hath geuen
a prefence of Iiis godhead, Co as he was fayed to be beholden face to
face,but al thefe (ignes that euer he fliewed did aptly leiue (or meanes
to teachcjand wirhall did plainly admonifh men of an mcomprehcn-
(ible elTence.For the cloudc and fmoke and flame,alihough they were
tokens of the hcauenly glory , yet did they as it were bridle and re- ^cu >
ftraine the mindcs of men that they fhould not attempt to pafle any "*
further. Wherfore not Mofes himfelfe, to whom God diCdoCsd him-
felfe moft familiarly in comparifon of otherjobtcined by prayer to fee Exo. j
that face, but recey ued this anfvvcre tliat man is not able to fulteine fo ^ ^*
great brightnefle. The holy Ghoft appeared vnderche IikcncfTeofa
doue , but (ith he immediatly vanifhed away , who docth not fee that Mat. ^
by that token of fo fhort a continuance of a moment the faithfull are *^*
put in minde that they ought to belcue him to be an inuifible fpirite,
that holding them contented with his vertue and grace , they Hiould
make him no outward fhape. This, that God appeared fometimes in
forme of a ma,was a forefhewing of the reucling that was to be made
ofhiminChrift. And therefore it was not lawfull for the lewes to
abufe this pretenfe to ered to themfelues a reprefcntacio of the god-
head in the fhape of man . Alfo the mercy fcare whcrin God fliewed
forth the prefence of his power in the time of the law , was fo made
as ic might teach that the beft beholding of the godhead is this, when
mens mindes are caried beyond them felues with adminiltration of ic.
For the Cherubins with their v/inges ftietched abrode did couer it, ^^q ,.
the vcile did hide it , and the place it fclfe being fet faire inwarde did 17. "
of it fclfe fufHciedy kepe it fecrete.Therfore it is very plaine that they
be very mad that go about t0 defende the images ofGod SfiofSaintes
with the example of thefe Cherubins. For , I pray you , what meant
thefe litle images, but to (hew that images are not mete to reprefent
the mifteries of God ? forafmuch as they were made for this purpofe,
that hiding the mercy featc v,'ith their wingcs they fliould not onely
kepe backe the eyes of m3n,but alfo aUhis fcnfcs from the beholding
of God, and fo to corredhis rafh hardinefife.For this purpofe maketh
it that the Prophetes defcribed the Seraphins (hewed the in vi(io,with 2Ci.6.t
their face vncouered:wherby they (ignifie,that fo great is the bright-
neffe of the glory of God that the Angels themfelues are kept from
dired beholding it, and the fmall fparkes thcrof that fhine in the An-
gels are withdrawen from our eyes . Although yet fo many as rightly
iudge,do acknowledge that the Cherubins of whom we now fpeake,
perteined only to the old maner of introdudion as it were of children
vfcd ill the law . So to draw tiiem now for an example to our age , is
D liij.
Cap.i I . Of the knowledge of
an abfurditie. For that childilli age, as I may fo terme ity is paflcd, for
the which fuch rudimentes were appointed . And it is much fhame,
that the painime writers are better expounders of the law of God
than the Papiftes are . luuenale reprocheth tiie Icwcs as it were in
fcorne that they honor the white cloudes & the deiiie of the heauen.
I graunt he fpeaketh peruerfly and wickedly: & yet he fpeaketh more
truely in faying that they haue among them no image of God , than
thePapillesdo which prate that they had a vifibJe image of God.
And wheras that people with a certaine hote haftineffe , brake out
oftenmes to ieke them idols,euen as waters out of a great freOi fpnng
buile out with violent force ; hereby rather let vs Icarne how great is
the inclination of our nature to idolatry, leaft throwing vpon the
lewcs the blame of that fault which is common to all , we fiepe a
deadly flepe vnder vaine allurementes to linne.
4 To the fame purpofe ferueth this faying. The idols of the Gen-
tiles are golde and fi'uer , eutn the workes of mens handcSc Becaufe
•» » 5 • the Prophete doth gather of the lUiffe it fcl fe , that they are no gods
, - th.n haue a golden or (iluer image: and he taketh it for cofeffed truth,
that it is a fohlh fained inuencion whatfocuer we coceiue oi our owne
Itnfe concerning God. Me namcth rather gold and filuer than clay or
flone , that the beautie or the price (hould not ferue to bring a reue-
rence to idols..Bui he cocludeth generally that nothing is IcfTe allow-
able, than gods to be made of dead ftuffe. And in the meane while he
ftandedi as much vpon this point , that men are caried away with to
mad a raHmefle , which the mfelucs bearing aboi»t with them but a
borrowed breath,ready to vanifh away at eucry moment, yet dare
geue the honor of God to idols . Man muft nedes confcfl'c thathim-
Uhc is but a creature of a daies continuance , and yet he will haue a
pece of metall to be compted God to which himfelfe gaue the be-
ginning to be a God. For whenfc came the beginning of idols but
from the will of men ? Very iuitly doeth the heathen Poet geue them
this taunt:
forat. ^ WM fometime a fig tree logy a blocj^c that ferud for nought:
m« I > The work^man douted what of me irere fitteft to be wrought:
•^* A fourme to Jit "vpon , or els a Vrlaf God to be.
At length he thought the better was a God to make ofmc.
Forfooth an earthly filly man that breatheth out his owne life m
maner euciy moment,by his workemanlliip fliall conuey the name &
honor of God to a dead ftocke. But forafmuch as Epicure in fcoffing-
ly iefting hath cared for no rehgion, let vs Icaue the tauntes of him &
fcich as he is,and let the rdbuking of the Prophete pricke vs or rather
thrull
thruft vs through where he fayeth, nat they are to much beaftly wit- Eray44,
ted that with one fclfe pcece of wood do make a fier & warme them- * 5.
felucs, do heate the ouen to bake bread, do roft or feeth flefli, and do
make the a God before which they fall down humbly to pray.Ther-
fore in an other place he doth not onely accufe them by the law ,but
alfo dochreproch them that they haue not learned of the fundations
of the carth:for that there is nothing lefle conueniem than to bring
God to the meafure of fiue foote which is aboue all meafure and in- Era.40.
coprehenhble. And yet this fame monftruous thing which manifeftiy 21.
repugneth againft the order of nature,cull:ome fheweth to be natural
to men. We mult moreouer holdc in minde, that fuperftitions are in Efa.a.S.
Scripture commonly rebuked in this phrafe of fpeech , that they are ^ ^^7'
the workes ot mens hand which want the authority of God: that this Oie,i4,
may becrrtaine, that all theXe manners of woriliipping that men do 4.
deuife ofthemfeluesare decgttablc. The Prophet in the Pfalme doth "liC'J*
amplifie the madnefle of them that therefore are endued with vndcr- * |*
{landing, that they Hiould know that ail thmegs arc moued with the j/
only power of God, and yet they pray for helpe to thinges dead and
renlelelfe.But becaufe the corruption of nature carieth as well all na-
tions, asecheman priuately to fo great madnefle, at lall: the, holy
Ghoft thundreth with terrible curfe againft them faying : let the that
make them become like to them and fo many as truft m them . And
itis to benotedthat-a fimihtude is no lefl!e forbidden than asrauen
image , whereby the fond futtelry of the Greekes is confuted . For
they thmke they are well difcharged if they graue not a God,\vhiIe in
painting they do more hcentioufly outrage than any other nations^
But the Lord forbiddeth an image not only to be made by the grauer
bur alfo to be counterfaited by any other workeman , becaufe fuch
counterfaiting is euill and to the dillionor of his maiefty.
^ I know that it is a faying more than common among the peo-
ple,that images are lay mens bookes. Gregory fo fayd^but the fpirite
ofGodpronounceth farreotherwife, inwhofe fchoole if Gregory
had bin taught, he would neuer fo haue fpoken. For whereas H;:;re- Hjer.io
my plainly fayeth that the ftocke is a dodrinc of vanity : and whereas 8.
Habacuctcacheth that the molten image is a teacher of lyes : furely ^^-^-^^
hereof IS a generall dodrinc to be gathered, that it is vainc and lying
whatfoeuer men learne by images concerning God . If any man take
exception, and fay that the Prophetes reprouc them only which abu-
fed images to wicked fuperftitionrl graunt that to be true. But I addc
further that which is eafie for all men to fee,th3t they condemne that
thing wholcly which the Papiftcs take for an aflured princi^>ie , that
Cap.i I . Of the knowledge of
linages are in ftede of bookes. For they do in comparifon fet images
againft Godasthinges diredly contrary & fuch as neuer can agree
together.T his comparifon I fay is made in thofe places which I hauc
alleged. Sich there is but one true God whom the lewes did wor-
fhjpjit IS amifle & ialftly don to forge vifible (hapes toreprefent God
and men are mifcrably dcceiued, that thereby feeke for knowledge of
God. Finally if it were not true that it is a deceitfuU & corrupt know-
ledge of God that is learned by images, the Prophetes would not fo
generally condcmne it. At leaft thus much I winne of them when wc
fhew that it is vanity & lying that men do attempt to reprefent God
with images , we do nothing but rehcarfe word for word that which
the Prophetes haue taught.
6 Let be red what Ladantius and Eufebius haue wrv'tten of this
matter which fticke not to take it for ccrtaine that they were all mor-
tall of whom images are to be feene . Likewife Auguftine : which
without douting pronounceth that it is vnlawfull not onely to wor-
Concil ^'P imagesjbut alfo to fette vppe images to God. And yet fayeth he
libert.' none other thing but the fame which manyyearcs before was de-
ca.6.c3, creed by the Eiibertine councell whereof this is the x x x vi. Chapter,
3^- It is ordained that no pidures be had in the church , that the thing
Ciurca- ^^^^^ ^^ honored and worfliipped be not painted on the wales . But
te Dei. ^oQ: notable is that which in an other place Auguftine allegeth out
ca.9. & of Varro , and confirmeth it with his owne aflent , that they which
i^' firft brought in the images of Gods , both tooke away the fearc of
God^and brought in errour . If Varro alone fhould fay this , parad-
uenture it fliould be but of fmale authority. Yec ought it of right to
make vs alliamed that a heathen man groping in darkeneffe came to
this hght,to fee that bodily images are therefore vnmete for the ma-
ietty of God , becaufe they diminifh the feare of God and encreafe
errour in men . The proofe it felfe witnelTeth that this was no lefle
truly than wifely fpoken. But Auguftine hauing borrowed it of Var-
rojbringcth it foorth as of his own minde. And firft he admonilheth,
that the firft crrours wherwith men were entangled cocerning God,
beganne not of images, but as with newe matter added encreafcd by
them. Secondly he expoundcth that the feare of God is therfore mi-
nijlied or rather taken away therby,becaufc his maiefty may eafely in
the fooliftmefle and in the fond and abfurde forging of images grow
to contept. Which fecond thing I would to God we did not by proufe
find to be fo true.Whofoeuer therfore wil couct to be rightly taught,
let him elfe where leaine than of images 3 what is mete to be knowcti
concerning God.
7 Wherefore
God the Creator. Lib.i, ;o
7 Wherfore if the Papiftcs haue any (liame, let them no more vfc
this (liift to fay that images are lay mens bookes, which by many te-
ftimonies of Scripture are fo openly confuted. And ahhough 1 graiit
the fo much,yet (hould they not much get therby for defcnfe of their
idols What monfters they thruft in,in the place of God, is well kno-
wen.The pidures and imagesthat they dedicate to Saindes,what arc
they but examples of extreme riot and vnclennefle, whcreunto if any
would fafhio huTifelfe,hc were worthy to be beate with ftaucsPSurely
the broihelhoufesjcan (hew harlots more chaftly and foberly attyred,
tha their temples (hew images of thcfe whom they would haue cal-
led virgms.Euen as vncomly array giue they to the martirs.Ltt them
therfore fafliio their idols at leaft to fome honeft (licw of lliamefaft-
neSjthat they may fomwhat more colourably iye in faying, that they
arc the books of fome hohnefle. But if it were fo, yet then would wc
anfwere,that this is not the right way to teach the taithfull people in
holy places, whom God would haue there inftruded with farre other
doftrine than with thefe trifles . God commaunded in the churches a
common dodrine to be fet forth to all men in preaching of his word
and in his holy mifleriesjwhcreunro they fliew them felues to haue a
minde not very hedefuU, that ca(^ their eyes about to behold images.
But whom do the Papiltes call lay and vnlearned men whole vnskil-
fulneife may beare to be taught only by images ? forfooth euen thofe
whom the Lord knowledgeth for his difciples,to whom he vouchefa-
ueth to reuele the heauely wi(<k)m,whom he willeth to be inltrudect
with the holfome miftenes of his kingdom.I graiit in dede as the mat
ter (^andeth that there are at this day many which cannot be without
fuch boks.But whenfe I pray you groweth that dulncflfe but that they
are defrauded of that dodrine which only was mete to inftrud them
with?, For It is for no other caufe that they which had the cure of
churches gaue ouer their office of teaching to idols,but becaufe the-
felues were dumme. Paul teftifieth that Chrift is in the true preaching ^ .
of the Gofpell, painted out and in a mancr crucified before our eyes. '*
To what purpofe then were it to haue commonly fet vp in churches
fo many croiTes of wood,ftone,(iluer & gold,if this were wel & faith-
fully beate into che peoples heads,that Chrift died to beare our curfe
vpon the croffe, to deanfe our (innes with the Sacrifice of his body,
and to wafh them away with his bloud , and finally to reconcile vs to
God the father?Of which one thing they might learne more than of
a thoufand crofTes of wood or fione . For parhaps the couetous do
fet their mindes & eyes fafter vpon the golden and filuer croffcs than
vponany wordesofGod. \
~ Cap.ii. Of the knowledge of
8 As concerning the beginning of idoJSjthat is by common con-
Sap. 14. ^^"^ thought to be true which is wryiten in the booke of wifdom,
1 J. that they were the firft authors of them j which gaue this honor to
the deade,fuperfticioufly to worfhip their memory. And truly I graut
iha t this euil cuftome was very auncientjSc I deny not that it was the
fierbrad wher^ith the rage of men being kindled to idolatry did more
and more burne therein. Yer do I not graunt that this was the firft o-
riginalof thismilchiefe.Foritnppereth byMoifes that images were
vfed before that this curio(ity in dedicating the images of dead men,
wherof the prophane wryters make often mcntion,were come in vrc.
Gcij.31.Wncn he telleth that Rachell had ftole her fathers idolsjhc fpeaketh
ii». it as of a common fault. Whereby wc may gather that the wit of man
!S,as I m.ay fo callitja continuall worfliip of idols. After the generail
fioud, there was as it were a new regeneration of the world, and yet
there pafled not many yeares but that men according to their owne
luft fained them Gods. And it is likely that the holy Patriarch yet li-
uingjhis childrens children were giuen to idolatry, [o that to his bit-
ter griefe he faw the earth defiled with idols , whofe corruptions the
lof 14. ^^^^ ^"^^^ but late purged with fo horrible iudgemcnt.For Thare and
J, * Nachor eue before the birth of Abraham were worfhippers of falfc
Gods,as lofue teftifieth. Seeing the generation ofSem fo foone fvvar-
ued, what fliali we iudge of the pofterity of Chamjwho were already
curfcd in their fathcr?The minde of mcn,as it is iull of pride and raHi
boldneflejprefumeih to imagine God according to her owne conceit:
and as it is polTefled with dullncfl'c , yea ouer whelmed with grofle i-
gnoraunce, fo ir coceiueth vanity and a fond fantafie in ftede of God.
And to thefe euils is adde<i a new mifchiefe, that man attempteth to
c^preflTe in workemanfhippe fuch a God as he inwardly conceiueth.
Thus the minde begetteth the idole ,and the hand bringeth ii: forth.
The example of the Ifraclitcspioueth that this was the beginning
of idolarry,that men do not bcleue that God is among them, vnlcfle
he fhcw himfelfe carnally prelenr. We know not (fayd they) what is
become of this Mofesimake vs Gods that may go before vs . They
Ex. 31.1. knew that there was a God whofe power they had had experience of
in fo many miracles:but they did not beleue that he was nie vnto the
vnlefle they did fee with their eyes a corporall reprefentarion of his
face,to be a witncfTe vnto them of the God that gouerned the.Thcir
minde was therefore to know by the image going before them, that
God was the guide of their iourney.This thing daily experience tea-
cheth , that the flefh is alway vnquiet till it hath gotten feme coun-
terfaite deuifc hke it fclfc, whcrem it may vainly dehte as in an junage
of
God the Creator. Lib.i. 31
of God. In a manner m all ages fince the creatjon of the world,men
to obey this bhnde delirc haue ereded fignes wherein they imagi-
ned God to be prefent before theyr carnall eyes.
9 After fuch inuention forged, byandby followeih vvorfhipping.
For whe men tliought that they beheld God in images,they did alio
worfhip him in them. Ai length being both with mindes and eyes al-
together fattened thcron,they beganneto waxe more and more bru-
tifh,and to wonder at them and haue them in admiration, as if there
were fbme nature ofgodhead in them.So appeareth that men brake
notoutintotheworfliippmg of images, till they were perfwadcd in-
fome grofle opinionmot to thinke the images to be Gods> but to i-
maginc that there did a certaine force of Godheade abide in thera.
Therfore whether thou reprefent to thy felfe either God or a crea-
ture in the image,when thou falleft downe to worfhip,thou art alrea-
dy bewitched with fome fuperftition , For this reafon the Lord hath
forbidden notoncly images to be ereded that are made to exprefic
alikenefleofhim, buialfoany titles or ftones to be dedicated, that
fliouldftand tobe worHiipped. And for the fame reafon alfo in the
comaundemcnt of the law,this other point is added concerning wor-
fhipping. For fo foone as they haue forged a vij!]ble forme for God^
they alfo tye the power of God vnto it. So bcatliy ifiolifh arc men,
that there they fatten God where they counterfaite him,and therfore
mutt they necdes worfliip it. Neither is there any difterence whether
they (imply worfliip the idole,or God in the idole.This is alway ido-
latry when honoures due to Godaregiucn to an idole, vnder what
colour foeuer it be. And becaufe God will not be worfiiipped fuper-
ftitioufly , therefore what(beuer is giucn to idols is taken from him.
Lette them take heede hereunto thatfeeke for pretenfes to defcnde
the abhominable idolacry,wherewith, thefe many ages paftjtrue teli-
gion hath bin drowned and ouerthrowen. But (fay thcy)the images
are not taken for Gods . Neither were the lewes themfelues fo vn-
aduifed to forgette that it was God by whofe hande they hadde bin
brought out of -^gypt before they made the calfe. Yea when Aaron
faydjthat thofe were the Gods by whom they were deliuered out of
the land ofi£gypt,they boldly alfentedjAiewing a plainc toke of their
meaningjthat they would ftill kcpe that God that was their deliuerer,
fo that they might (v him go before them in the calfe.Nejther is it to
be beleued that the heaihe were fo groffe as to beleue,that God was
no other thing bur ttocks and ftones.For they changed their im.':£;es
at their pleafure, butttill they ktfpt die fame Gods in their minde:&
there weic many images of one God, and yet clicy did not according
Cap. 1 1 . Of the knowledge of
to the multitude of images faine them many God. Befidc that they
did daily cofecrat new images,yet did they not thinke that they made
I pfal. "^^ Gods . Lette the excufes be read which Auguftine fayeth were
13. pretended by the Idolaters of his age. When they were rebuked,the
common forte aunfvvered, that they did not worlhippe that viliblc
thing, but the deity that did in it inuifibly dwell. And they that were
of fomwhat better rcligiojas he calleth itjdid fay that they did neither
worlhippe the image nor the fpinte in it,but by the corporall image
they did behold the figne of that thing which they ought to worl'hi'p.
How then ? All idolaters, whether they were of the Icwes , or of the
gentiles , were none oiherwife minded than as I haue fiyd: being not
cometed with a fpirituall vnderftandingof God,they thought by the
images he {hould be more fure & nerer imprinted in the. After once
that fuch difordered counterfairingof God well hked them, they nc-
uer ended , till daily more and more deluded with new deceives they
imagined that God did flic w foorth his power in images. And neuer-
thelelfe , both the lewes were perfwaded that vnderfuch images
ihey did worfliippe the one true Lord of hcauen and earth : and like-
wife the gentiles, their falle Gods, whom yet they fayned to dwell in
heauen.
10 Whofoeuer deny that it hath thus bin done in time paft , yea
within our owne rcmembrauncejthey impudently lye . For, why fall
they down before them?And when they pray, why turne they toward
1 pfal. them as to the eares of God?For it is true that Auguftine fayeth,that
«3« noman prayeth or worfhippeth when he fo beholdech an image but
he is fo afteded in minde that he rhinketh himfclfc to be heard of it,
or that it wil do for him what he defireth. Why is there fuch differece
betwene the images of one God, that paffing by one image with title
reuerence or none done to it they honor an other folcmnly? Whydo
they wery themfelues with vowed pilgremages to vifite tho(e images
whereof they haue like at home? Why do they at this day in defenfc
of them as it were for their rchgionand countrey, fight to flaughter
& dcftrudiOjin fuch forte as they would better fufFer to haue the one
only God than their idols to be taken from them ? And yet I do not
recken vp the grolfe crrouis of the comon people, which are almoft
infinite, & do in maner polfcfle the hartes of all men. I do only lliewe
what themfelues do confeffc when they meane moft of all to excufe
themfelues of idolatry. We do not call them (fay they)our Gods.No
more did the lewes nor the Gentiles call them theirs in time paft:&
yet the Prophetes ech where ccffc not to caft in their teeth their for-
nication with ftockes and ftones, for doing no more but fuch things
as
God the Creator. Lib.i. 3 2
as arc daily done by them that would be compted Chriftia$,that is to
fayjthat they carnally worfliipped God in flocks and ftones.
1 1 Although I am not ignoraunt , nor thinke good to paflfe it o-
uer as if 1 knewe it not , how they feeke to efcapc with a more fut-
ile diftindion, wherof I fliall againe make mention more at large her-
after . For they pretend that the worfhip which they giue to images
is Idolodulia which is fcruice of images, and not Idololatria which is
worfhip of images. For fo they learme it when they teach that they
may lawfully without any wrong done to God giue vnto images and
pidures that worftiippe which ihey call Douha or feruice . And fo
they thinke themfelues without blame if they be but the feruaunts &
nocalfothe worfhippers of idols:as though it were notalule lighter
matter to worfhip than to feruc . And yet while they feeke a hole to
hide them in the Greeke word, they childirtily difagree with thcmfel-
ueSjFor feeing Latreuein in greeke iignifii^th nothing but to worfhip,
their faying commeth but to this cflfed^as if they would fay that they
worfhip in dede their images,but without any worfhipping. And ther
is no caufe why they fhould fay that I feeke to catch them in words:
but they themfelues while they feke to caft a mift before the eyes of
the fimplcjdo bewray their owne ignorauce. And yet though they be
ncuer fo eloquent,they fhall not atteine by their eloquence to proue
vnto vs that one felfe fame thing is two fundry things. Let them(fay
I)fliew me a differece in y thing it felfe whcrby they may be thought
to differ from the old idolaters. For as an adulterer era murderer can-
not efcape giltincfTe of his fault , by giuing his finne a newe deuifed
name:fo it is a very abfurdity to thinke that thefc men be quit by new
deuifc ofa name,if in the matter it felfe they nothing differ fro thofc
idolaters whom they themfelues are compelled to codemne. But fo
far are they fro prouing that their cafe difFereth fro the cafe of thofc
idolaters , that rather the fountaine of all this whole mifchiefe is at)
vnorderly counterfaiting, wherin they haue ftriued with them while
both with their owne wit they deuife,& with their owne handes they
frame them fignifying formes to cxprefTe them a fafhion of God.
1 z And yet am I not fo fuperltitious that 1 thinke no images may
be fufiicd at all. But forafmuch as caruing and painting are the giftes
of God, I require that they both b& purely and lawfully vfed . Leall
thefe tl.ings which God hath giue vs for his glory & for our own be-
nefit, be not only defiled by difordered abufcjbut alfo turned to our
own dcftrudio. We thir/Kc ir. vnlawful to haue God faOuoned out in
vifible formcjbecaufp himfclr'hath forbiddc it^Sc becaufe it canot be
done without fon>c defacemet of his i^lo^y. And leaft they thinke that
Cap, II. Of rhe knowledge of
it is onely we that are in this opinion , they that iiaue bin traueled in
their workes (hall finde that all found wryters did alway reproue the
fame thiiTg.iftheitbenotlawfullto make any bodily image of God,
much kik lliail it be lawfull to worship it for God , or God in it. It
rcmayncth therefore lawfull thatoneiy thofe thingcs be painted and
graucn whereof our eyes afire capable ; but that the maicfty of God
which IS farre aboue the fenfe of our eyes , be nor abufed with vn-
comly deuifed fliapcs. Of this forte are parceiy hiftories and thinges
done,p3rtt'ly images and fafhions of bodies, without expreffing of a-'
. ny thinges done by thcm.The fitll oFthefe haue fome vfe in teaching
or admonifhing a man:but what profit the fecond can bring faue only
dclet^bitjo j iee not. And yet it is eaidentjthat eucn fuch were almoft
' all the images that heretofore haue {land vp in churches . Whereby
we may iudge that they were there fet vp not by difcrete iudgement
or choifcbut by foohfii and vnaduifed defire.I fpeake no ' much
am4fre & vncomely they were for the moft parte fafIiioned,nor how
hcentioufly Painters and Caruers haue in this point /hewed theyr
vrantonncire,vv'hich thmg I haue already touched. Onely 1 fpeake to
this endjthat though there were no fault in them^yet do they nothing
auaile to teach.
I g But leaning alfo that diffcrencejlct vs by the way confider whe-
ther it be expedient in Chriftian temples to haue any images at all,
that do exprefTe either things done or the bodyes of men. Firft if the
auchonty of the aunciet church do any thing moue vSjlet vs remem-
ber that for about v.C. yeares together, while religion yet better flo-
rifhcd,and fincerc do(^rine was in force,the Chriftian churches were
vniuerfally without images. So they were the firft brought in for the
garnilhment of churches , when the fincerity of miniftration was not
a little altered. I will not now difpute what reafon they had with them
that were the firft authors therof. But if a ma compare age with age,
he (hall lee that they were much fwarued from that vprightnefle of
tfiem that wt,c without images. What ? do we thinke that thofe holy
fathtrs would haue fuftlred the church to be fo long without the
thing which they iudged profitable $c good for them? But rather be-
caufc rhey faw either little or no profit in ir,& much daunger to lurke
vnderneth it, they did rather of purpofe and aduifedly reied it , than
Epi. ^p, by ignoraunce or negligence omitte it. Which thing Auguftine doth
alfo in exprcfle words teftifie.When they be fet in fuch placcs(layeth
he) honorably on hye, to be feene of them thp.t pray & do Sacrifice,
althc'Ugh they want both fenfe and Iife,yct with tuC very likenelfe that
they haue of liueiy members and fcnfes , they Co oioue the weakc
mindes.
God the Creator. Lib.i. 33
mindeSjthat they fceme to liuc & brcath.&c. And in an other place.
For thatfhapeof members doth workeand in manner enforce thus in pfai.
much, that the minde huing within a body doth thinkc that body to 1 1 j.
haue fenfe , which he feeth like vnto his owne . And a little afterj I-
mages do more auaile to bow downe an vnhappy foule, by this that
they haue mouth,eyeSteares,and feete, than to amend it by this that
they neither fpcake nor fee nor heare nor go. This truely feemeth to "
be the caufe why John willed vs to beware not onely of wor/hirping i.Toh.5
of images, but alfo of images themfelues. And we haue found ir to 21.
much in experience, that through the horrible madnefTe which hath,
heretofore pofTcfled the world , to the deftrudion in manner of all
godlineire,fb foone as images be let vp in churcheSjihere is as it were
a fignc fct vp of idolatry, becaufe the folly of men cannot refraync it
felfe,but it muft foorthwith runne on to fuperfticibus worlhippmges.
But if there were not fo much daunger hanging thereby : yet when I
confider for what vfe temples are ordayned , mc ihinkes it is very ill
befeeming theholinefle thereof to rcceiue any other images than
thcfc liuely and naturall images, which the Lord by his word hath
confecrate,! meanc Baptifme and the Lordes fuppcr, and other cere-
monies wherewith our eyes ought both more earneftJy to be occu-
pied and more liuely to be moyed,th3n that they Ihould nede any o-
ther images framed by the witte of men.Loe this is the incomparable
commodity of images,which can by no value be recompenfed,if wc
belcue the Papiftes.
14 I thinkc I had fpoke enough of this thing already,but that the
Nicenc Synodedoth as it were lay hand on me to enforce mcto
(peake more. I meane not that moft famous Synode which Conftan-
tine the Great aflembled, but that which was holden eisht hundred
yeares ago.by the commaundemcnr and authority of Irene the Em-
preflc. For that Synodedecreed,that images fhould not only be had
in churches, but alfo worfhipped. Forwhatfocuerlfhouldfayjthe
authority of the Synode would make a great preiudice on the other
fide. Although to fay truth,that doth not fo much moue mc,as m?kc
it appeare to the readers howe faire their rage extended, that were
more dcfirous of images than became Chriftians. But firft leite vs di-
(patche this.They that at this day maintaine the vfe of images,allegc
tnc decree of that Nicene Synode for their defenfe.But there is cxtat
a booke of confutation bearing the name of Charles the Great,which
by the phrafe we may gather to haue bin wrytten at the fame time.
Therein arc recited the fentenccs of the Biflioppes that were prefcnr
at that coanccU , and the argumentcs wherewith they contende«i.
£
Cap. 1 1 . Of the knowledge of
lohn the Legate of the e.ift partes fayed : God created manne after
his owne image : and thereupon gathered chat we ought to hauei-
mages. The lame man thought that images were commended vnto
vs in this rentence:niew me thy face bccaufe it is bcautifull. An other
to prouc that images ought to be fecte vppon alcares , cited this tc-
ftimony : no man hghieth a candell and putteth it vnder a bufhcll.
Another, to (hew that the beholding of them is profitable for vs,
brought foorth a verfe out of the Pfalmc : the light of thy countc-
naunce is fealed vpon vs. An other tooke this fimilitude : As the Pa-
triarchcs vfcd the Sacrifices of the Gentiles , fo muft Chriftian mCn
hauc the images of Saintes in fteade of the images of the Gentiles.
To the fame purpofe haue they wrythed this faying:Lord,I haue lo-
ued the beauty of thy houfc . But Specially witty is the expofition of
this place, As we hane heard fo haue we fcen,that God is not knowc
by onely hearing of his word,but alfo by looking vppon imagcs.Likc
isthe fharpedcuife of Bifhoppc Theodore. Maruelous (Tayethhe)
is God in his Samt :s. And in an other place: In the Saintes that
are in the earth : therefore this ought to be referred to images . Fi-
nally fo filthy are tlieir vofauory follies that it greucth me to rehearfc
them.
1 5 When they talke of the worfliipping: then are brought foorth
the worfliipptng of Pharao, and of the rod of lofeph, & of the piller
that lacob fet vp.Albeitinthislaftexample,they do not only deprauc
the meaning of the Scripture , but alfo bring in that which is no
where to be read. Then thefe places feeme to them maruelous
ftrong and meete proues. Worfliip his footeftole. Againe worfhippc
on his holy hill. Againe all the richcmen of the people fhall worfliip
thy countenaunce . If a man would in fcorne puttc the perfonage pf
aridins; foole vppon the patronesof Images, could he gather to-
gether greater and ^rofflr follies ?But to putte all out of doate,Theo-
dofius Riflioppe ofMira , doth fo earneftly confirme by the dreamcs
of his Archedeaco, that im.iges ought to be worftiipped,as if he had
an oracle from heauen to (liewe for it. Now lette the fauourers of i-
fnages go and preffe vs with the decree of that Synode. As though
thoie reuerend fathers do not altogether difcredit themfclues , in
cither fo childifhly handeling, orfo vngodly and fowly tearing the
Scriptures.
i6 Now come I to thofe monftrous impieties,which it is marucU
thateuertheyduift vomit, andrwifemarutllous that they were not
cried out agaynftwith hie detcftation of allmrn . And it is good
that this outragioufly wicked madnefle be be wraycd,that at leaft the
falfc
God the Creator. Lib.i. 34
falfc colour of antiquity may be taken away , which the Papiftcs pre-
tend for the worfhipping of images, Theodofius the BiHiop of Amo-
rum pronounceth curfeagainft all them that will not haue images
worfhippcd . An other imputeth all the calamities of Grecia and the
caft part to this,that images were not worshipped. What punifhment
then were the Prophetes 5 theApoftles and the Martirs wortiiy to
fufFer in whofe time there were no images ? They adde further. It the
Emperoures image t)e met with perfume andcenfing : much more is
this honor due to the images of Saintes.Conftantius Bifhop of Con-
ftancc in Ciprus,profefleth that he reuerently emhraccth images,and
afBrmeth that he will giueto them the fame honorable mancr of
worfhippe that is due to the Trinity that giueth life. And whofoeuer
refufeth fo to do,he curfeth him and fendeth him away with the Ma-
nichees and Marcionites. And,chat ye fliould not thinke that this w-is
the priuate fentence of one man , they did all aflfent vnto it. Yea lohn
the Legate of the eaft partes being further caried withheate,fayed ii
were better to bring all brothelhoufes into the city than to deny the
worfhipping of images . At length by confent of them all it was de-
creed , that worfe than all Heretickes are the Samaritans , and worfc
tha the Samaritans are the enemies of miagcs. And becaufe the play
(houjdnotbe without his folemnefarewclljthis claufe was added, let
the be glad & rcioyfe that hauing the image of Chrift do oflfer Sacri-
fice vnto it.Where is now the diftindion of Latria and Dulia, where- ^
with they are wont to fceke to blinde the eyes both of God & men ?
.For the councell without any exception doth giuc eucn as much vnto
images as vnto the liuing God himfclfe.
The xij. Chapter*
That God isftHtrally difetrnedjfom tdoh^ that he taay bt $nly
andvvholely vvorshtpped.
WE fayed in the beginning that the knowledge of Gcd
ftandcth not in bare fpccularion , but draweth with it
the worfliipping of him , and by the way we touched
howe he is rightly worfhippcd, which point fhalbc in o-
thcr places more largely to be fette foorth. Now I do but fhortly re-
peate, that fo oft as the Scripture affirmeth that there is but one
God , it ftriucth not for the bare name of God , but wiihall com-
maundeth this , that whatfoeuer belongethto the Godhead be not
giuen to any other. Whereby alfo appearcth what pure religion doth
differ from fuperftition.Eufcbeia,in Greeke (ignifieth as much as true
worfliip,bccaufe alway cucn the blindc themfclues groping in darkc-
E ij.
Cap.i2. Of the knowledge of
nelfe haue found that this rule ought to be holden, that God be not
vnorderly worfliipped. The name ofrehgion although Cicero truely .
and well deriueth fioni rclegcre , to recordc , or gather vp togethen
yet is the i eafon that he amgneth enforced and farre fettc,that good
worlhippers did often recorde anddiligently wey what was the trueth.
I rather ihinke that that name is fctte as a contrary to wandring li-
bertyjbecaufe the greater parte of the world vnaduifcdly taketh hold
of that which they firft mete withall, and flieth about hither and thi-
ther : but ttue godlineflc , to theenditmay ftand in ftedfaft ftatc,
Religitjthat is to fay doth gather vp it felf together within her bonds.
Like as I thinke fuperfticion to haue her name hereofjthat not being
contented with the maner and qrder prefcribcdjfhe heapeth vp toge-
ther a fuperfluous nomber of vaine thinges. But to leauc the wordes
it hath alway bin agreed by confent of all ages , that religion is with
falfe errours corrupted and peruertcd. Whereupon we gather that it
is a very fond colour which the fuperftitious do pretend , when with
vndifcrcte 2ealc we giue out felucs leaue to do all thinges . And al-
though this confeflion found in the mouthes of all men : yet herein a
fhamefull ignoraunce bcwrayeth it fclfe , that neither they cleaue to
the one God , nor haue any rcgardc of order in the worlhippinge of
him, as we haue already fhcwed . But God, to daime his ownc right
Vnto himfelfe,crieth out that he is iclous,and that he will be a feuerc
reuenger if he be mingled with any fayned God. And then he fettcth
forth the lawful maner of worfhipping, to hold makinde in obcdiecc.
Heconteincthboth thefe pointesin his law, when firft he bindeih
the faithfuU vnto himfelfe that he only may be their lawmaker : and
then he prefcribeth a rule whereby to be worfliipped after his ownc
mindc.Of the laWjbecaufe the vfcs and endes thereof arc many,I will
entreate in place fitte for it. Now f only touch this point,that there-
by me are brideled that they run not out of the way to wrong wor-
(hippinges. Now as I firft fayd,vve muft hold in minde, that if all that
ei-er properly belongeth to godhead do not reft in God alone , he is
fpoyledof his honor, and hisworfhippe broken. And there muft wc
fomewhat hedcfully mai kc with what futtelties fuperftitio deceiueth.
For ir doth not fo reuolte vnto ftraunge gods that it feemeth to for-
fake the hieft God, or to bring him downe into the number of other
gods; but while flic grauteth vnto him the hieft place,fhe fettethroiid
about him a number of lefiergodj, among whom (he diuideth his
officcs?And fof albeit clokcdly and craftilyjthe glory of the godhead
is cut in partes, that it remaincth not whole with him. So in the old
time , as well they of the lewes as of the Gentiles did fe t beneth the
fathei:
God the Creator. Lib.i. 3j
father & iudge of gods a great rout of gods which {hould cuery one
according to his de^ee in comon haue withy hiell God the gouern-
mcnt of the hcauen and earth . So the Saintes that in a few ages paft
departed this hfe,arc aduaunccd to the fellowfhip of God,to be wor-
fhipped,called vpon, & honored in fteade of him. And yet with fuch
abhomination we thinke that the maiefty of God is not fo much as
diuidedjwhcn in deede it is a great parte fupprcfled and extioguilhed,
fauing that we retaine ftill a poorc opinion of his fupreme power : 8c
in the meane time deceiued with entangled futtehics we are fanderly
caried to diuers gods.
2 For this purpofe alfo was inuented the diftin(flion of Latria
and Dulia, as they terme them, that is worfhippe and feruice, where-
by they might freely feeme to giue away the honors of God to an-
gels and dead mcn.For it is euident,that the worfhippe which the Pa-
piftes giue vnto faintes difFereih nothing in deede from the wor«
{hippe of God.For all alike without diuerfity they worfhip both God
and themrfauing that when they be charged with it, they winde away
with this exception,that they kepe ftill for God the honor that is due
vnto him inuiolate, becaufe they leaue vnto him the worfhippe that
they call Latria . But lith the queftion ibndcih vpon the matter, and
not the word, who would permitte them fo carelefTcly to mocke in a
matter ofall matters moft weighty ? But to lette that alfo prifTe , yec
winne they nothing by this diflindion , but to proue , that they giue
worfhippe to one God and feruice to an other . For Latria in gretke
fignifieth as much as in Latin Cultus, and in Enj:;lifh worfhippe. Du-
lia,properly fignifieth fcruicc.And yet fometime in fcripture this diu 0»
ferencc is confounded together without diuerficy. But graunt it be a
pcrpetuall difference,then mufl we fearch what both the words may
meane . Duha is feruice, Latria is worfhippe. Now no man doutcth
that to feruc, is more then to worfhip. For many times a man could
hardly beare to feruehim whom he would notftickcto worfliippc*
So is it an vnegall dealing to giue to the faintes that which is the
greater, and to leaue to God that which is the IcfTer. But many of
thcauncient authors haue vfed this difiin^lion . What maketh that
matter,if all men do perceiue it to be not onely vnfit, but all together
very fond?
3 Now leaning nice futtelties, let vs wey the matter it felfe.When
Paulc putteththe Galathiansin remembrance what they were be- Ca!.4,S
fore that they were lightened in the knowledge of God,he faieth that
they gauc Duliam feruice to thofe that of nature were no gods . Al-
though he name not Latriam or worfhip, is therforc their fuperilitio
E iij.
r
Cap. 12. Of the knowledge of
exculable ? He dorh. ncuerthelcffe condemne thdr pcrucrfc (uperfti-
tion, which he tcrmeth by the name of Dulia feruice , than if he had
exprefTed the name of Larria, woifhip. And whe Chrift repulfeth the
aflault of Sathan with his buckler, that it is wrytten, thou fhalt wor-
Matt.4. fhjp ji^e Lord thy God, the name of Latria was not brought in que*
Reu 19. ft'On.Sathan required but an adoration. Likewife when the angeil re-
10. * proued Iohn,becaufe he fell down on his knees before him, we ought
not to thinkc that lohn was fo madde that he would giue vnto the
aiigcU the honor that was due onely to God . But becaufe it was not
poffible , but that all worfhip that is ioyned with religion fauouretU
fomcwhat as pertaining to God , therefore he could not adore t|ie
an^ell,butthac he muft take away fomewhat from the glory of God.
Wo read m dccdc often , that men haue bin honored: but that was a
ciuilc honor,as 1 may fo callit.But religion hath an other rule,which
{o foone as it is ioyned with worfhippc, bringeth with it a prop banc
Aft, to. abufe of the honor of God. The fame may we fee in Cornelius . He
*^* had not fo fclcndcrly profited in godlinefTe , but that he had learned
to giue the foueraigne worlhip to God alone. Therefore when he fell
downe before Petcr,he did it not of this meaning to worfhip him in
the ftcede of God. And yet did Peter carneftly forbid him to do that
•which he did. And why fo? but becaufe men do neuer fo narowly
'put difference betwene y worfhip of God & of his creatures: but that
with6ut diuerfity they giue away that vnto the creature, which beJon-
^eth vnto God. Wherefore if we haue one God , wc muft rcmembet
that nothing be it neuer fo httle mult be taken away from his glory,
Z.!Sa4 ^"^ ^^^^ ^^ keepe flill that which is properly his . Therefore Zacha-
^. * ^ iy when he preacheth of the repairing of the Church,in plaine words
expreifeth: That there fliall not only be one Godjbut alfo that there
fhalbe one name of that God , to the end that he haue nothing in
common with Idols. What maner of worrtiip God requircth,we fhal
fee in an other place when it falleth in order. For itpleafed him in his
law to prefcribe vnto men what is lawfull and right , and fo to bmdc
them to accrtaine rulejthat euery man (hould not gcue himfelfe leauc
to deuife what forme of worfhippe he lift. But becaufe it is not expe-
dient to loade the readers with heaping many matters together,! will
not touche that point yet. Oncly lette it fuffife for this time to kepc
in minde, that euery carying away of the duetyfull behauiours
of Godlincffe to any other than to God alone , is not without rob-
bery of God. And firft fiiperftirion dcuifedto giue diuine honors
to ihe Sonne, or other ftarrcs or idols : then followed ambitious
pride , which garnifhing mortall men with fpoylcs taken from God,
prefumcd
God the Creator. Lib.i. 3(^
prefumed toprophane all that euer was holy. And althoughthis
principle remained among them , to honour the foucraigne deity,
yetgrcwe it in vfe indiflfcrcntly to offer facrificesco fpirites, IciTer
gods,or deade men of honor.So flippery is the way to flidc into this
fault , to make common to a number that which God feueicly cha-
lengeth to himfeife alone.
' Tlie xiij. Chapter.
That thtre is tanght in the Scriptures one ejfence of God from the very
ereation^vvhich ejfence centaineth in it three perjons,
T Hat which is taught in ihs Scriptures concerning the incom-
prehenfiblc and fpirituall eflence of God , ought to iuffife not
onely toouerihrow the foolifh errours of the common peo-
ple , but alfo to confute the Hne futtelties of prophane phi-
lofbphie. One of the old wryters fecmed tohaue fayd very well.
That God is all that we do fee, and all that we do not fee.But by this
meane he hath imagined the godheade to be powrcd into all the
Eartcs of the world. Although God, to the intent to kepe men in fo-
er minde,fpcaketh but fparely of his owne c{rence,yet by thofc two
names of addition that I haue rehearfed, he doth both take away all
grofle imaginations , and alforeprefle the preflimptuous boldncflfe of
mans minde. For furcly his immeafurable greatnefle ought to make
vs afraidc, that we attempt not to meafur e him with our fenfetand his
fpirituall nature forbiddeth vs to imagine any thing earthly or ficfhly
of him. For the fame caufe he often afligncth his dwelling place to
be in hcauen. For thoiigh, as he is incpmprehenlible. he tjllcth the
earth alfo : yetbccaufe nefecthourmindes byreafonof theirduU-
neffb to l/e ftillin the earth, for good caufe hehftethvs vp aboue the
world , to fhake of our flouth and fluggifhneffc . And here falleth to
ground the errour of the Manichees, which in appointing two ori-
ginall beginninges haue made the diutll in a manner cgall with God*
Surely this was as much as to breake the vnity of God and reftrainc
his vnmeafurablenefle . For where they haue prefumed to abuie
certaine teftimonies : thatlhewcthafowleignoraunce, as their er-
rour it fclfe {hewcth a deteftable madneflc . And the Anthropomor-
phites are alfo eafilyconfured which haue imagined God toconfift
of a body, bccaufe oftentimes the Scripture afcribeth vnto him a
mouth, eares, eyes, handcs, and feetc. For what man yea though he
be fclendcrly wittcd doorh not vnderftand that God doth Co with vs
fpeakc as it were childiflily, as nurfcs do with their babes? Therefore
fuch maners of fpeechc do notfo plainly exprefle what God is , as
£ iiij.
Cap, 13. Of the knowledge of
they do apply the vndeiftanding of him to our fclendcr capacity.
Which to do 5 it bchoucd of necellity that he defcended a great way
beneath his owne height.
t But he alfo ferteth out himfelfe by an other fpecial marke,whcr-
by he may be more nerely knowe. For he fo declareth himfelfe to be
but one , that he yet giucth himfelfe diftindly to be confidyed in
three peribn$:which except we learne, a bare & empty name ol God
without any true God flieth in our bramc . And that no man fhould
thmke that he is a threfold God,or that the one eflencc of God is di-
uided in three per(bns,we muil here fecke a (hort and ea(ie definuion
to dehucr vs from all errour. But becaufe many do make much a do
about this word Perfon, as a thing inuented by man : how iuftly they
do fojit is bcft firft to fee. The Apofties naming the fonne,the engra-
Heb.1.3 ueci forme of the Hypoftafis of his father , he vndoutedly meancth,
that the Father hath ibnne bcinsijwherin he diflsreth from the fonnc.
For to take it for Ellcnce (as fome expofitours haue done,as if Chnft
like a peece of vvaxe printed with a feale did reprefent the fubthncc
of the Father) were not ondy hard but alfo anabfurdity. For lith the
Elfence of God is fingle or one and vndiuifible , he that in himfelfe
contayneth it all and not by peccmeale,or by dcriu:tio >jbiit in whole
perfcdion,fhould very vnproperly yea fondly be called tlie engraued
forms of him . But becaufe the father although he be in his owne
,5foperty diftind , hath expreiTed himfelfe wl.olcly in his fonne, it is
for good caufc fayd, that he hath giuen his Hypoftafis, ro be C^^nc in
him. Wherwith sptly agreeth that which byandby followeth,that he
is the brightneffe of his glory. Surely by the Apoftles wordes we ga-
ther,that there is a ccrtaJne proper Hypoftafis in the fatlier, that flii-
neth in the fonne:whereby alfo againe is eafely perceiued the Hy po-
ftad's of the fonnc that diftinguifheth him from the Father.Like order
is in the hoi/ ghoft. For we ihall byandby proue him to be God,and
yet he muft nedcs be other than the father. Yet this diftindio is not of
the efTcncejWhich it is vnlawfuil to make manifold. Therefore if the
Apoltles teftimony be credited , it folio we th that there be in God
three Hj'poftafes.This terme feeing the Latines haue expreffed with
the name of Perfo, it were to much pride & waywardneffe to braule
about fo cleare a matter. But if we lift word for word to tranflatc, we
may call it Subfiftence.Many in the fame fcnfe haue called it fubftacc.
And the name of Perfon hath not bin in v(e among the Latines on-
ly; but alfo the Grecians, perhaps to declare a confent, haue taught
that there are three Profopa,that is to fay Perfons in God. But they,
whether they be Grekes or Latins that diilcr one from an other in the
wordc.
worHc , do very well agree in the fummc of the matter.
J Now howfocuer the heretikes barke at the name of pcrfone, or
fomcoucrmuchprccifefnen docarpethat they hke not the worde
fainedby deuifeofmen ;fithihey cannotgetof vs to fay , that there
be three, wherofeuery one is wholly God,nor yet that there be many
goddcs : what vnreafonablenefle is this, to miflike wordes , which ex-
prclTe none other thing but chat which is teftified and approued by
the Scriptures 'It were better(ray they)to reftraine not only our mea-
ningcs but alio our wordes within the boundes of Scripture , than to
deuife ftraunge names that cr.ay be the beginninges of difagrement
and brawling : fo do we tier our ftlues with ftrife about wordesrfo the
truth is loft m contending : fo charitie is broken by odioudy brawling
together. If they call chat a ftraunge woide, which cannot be fhewcd
in Scripture,as it is written in nonibrc of iiilables : then ihey bmdc v$
to a hard law, wherby is condemned all expofition that is nor pieced
together, with bare laying together of textes of Scripture.Butif they
meane that to be ftraunge , which beyng curioufly deuifed ,is fuper-
ftitioully defended , which maketh more for contention than edifica-
tion, which is either vnaptly,or to no proHte vfcd,which withdrawcih
from the fimplicitie of the word of God,then with all my hart I em-
brace their fobre mmde . For I iudge that we ought with no Icfle dc-
uout reuerence to talke of God than to ihinke of him,for as much as
what foeuer we do of our fclues thinke of him, is foolilh, and whatip
cuer we fpeake is vnfauory.But there is a certaine meafure to be kept.
We ought to learnc out of the Scriptures a rule both to thinke and
fpeake,wherby to examine all the thoughtes of our mindc & wordes
of our mouth. But what withftandeth vs,but that fuch as in Scripture
arc to our capacitie doutfuU and entangled, we may in plainer wordes
exprcfle them , being yet fuch wordes as do reucrenily and faithfully
feruc the truth of the Scripture , and be vfed fparely, modeftly , and
nor without occafion. Of which fort there are examples enow. And
where as it fhal by proofe appere that the Church of great neceflitia
was enforced to vfe the names of Trinitie , and Perfoncs, if any fhall
then finde fault with thehcwnefle of woordes , (hall he not be iuftiy
thought to be grecued at the hght of the truth, as he that blameth
only this that the truth is made fo plaine and cleare to difcerne?
4 Such newncfle of wordes, if it be fo to be called,commeth then
chiefly in vfe,when the truth is to be defended againft wranglers that
do mocke it out with cauillations . Which thing we haue at this day
to much in experience j who haue ^rcat bufinefl'e in vanquiffhing the
enemies of uue and founde do^nne. With fuch folding and crooked
Cap. 13. Of the knowledge of
winding thefe flippery fnakes do flide away , vnlefle they be ftrongly
gnped and holdtrn hard when they be taken. So the old fathers being
troubled with contending againft falfe dodrines , were compelled to
(hew their mcaningcs in excjuilite plainnefle , leaft they fhould leauc
any crooked by wayes to the wicked,to whom the douicfull conftruc-
tions of wordes were hidingholes of errours.Arrius confefled Chrift
to be God,and the fonne of God, becaufe he coulde not againfay the
cuident wordes of God , and as if he had bin fo fufticiently difchargcd
did faine a certaine confentwith the reft. But in the meane while he
ceaffed not to fcattcr abroade that Chrift was create,and had a begins
niiig as other creatures . But to the cndc they might draw forth his
winding futteltie out of his dcnne, the auncient fathers went further,
pronouncing Chnft to be the eternall fonne of the f;?ther and con*
fubftanciall with the father. Hereat wickedneflTe began to boile,whcn
the Arrians began to hate and dettfte the name OOT3o«/?(»«,confubfta-
ciall. But if in the beginning they had finccrely and with pbine mea»
ning confefled Chnft to be God , they would not now haue denied
him to be confubftantial with the father. Who dare now bbmc thefc
good men as brawlers and contentious , bycaufc for one litle wordes
fake, they were fo whote in difputatio.and troubled thequiete of the
Church ? But that httle worde fliewed the difFeiccc betwene the true
beleuiiig Chriftians,and the A rrians that were robbers of God. A fter-
ward rofe vp Sabellius which accompted in a maner for nothing the
names of the Father, the Sonne, and the Holy ghoft, faying in difpu-
taiion that they were not made to fhew any maner of diftin6tion,but
onely were fcuerall additions of God ,of which forte there are many.
If he came to difputatio.he conft fled,that he btleued the fathcrG od,
the fonne God, the Holy ghoft God. But afterward he would redely
flippc away with fiying that he hadde in no othervvife fpokcn than as
if he had named God,a ftrong God,iuft God, and wife God:and fo he
fong another fong,that the Father is the Sonne,and t!ic Holy ghoft is
the father,without any order,without any diftind!6. The good doc-
tours which then had care of godlinefle, tofubdew his wickcdntfle,
cried out on the other fide that there ought to be acknowledged in one
God three propretics.And to the end 10 fenfe rhemfelucs againft the
crooked writhe futileties with plaine and fimple truth, they affirmed,
that there did trueiy fubfift in one God,or (which came all to one ef-
fcd)th3t there did fubfift in the vnitie of God a Trinitie of perfons.
^ If then the names haue not bin*without cttoCc ini'ettd,we ought
to take hede, that in rcieding the we be not iudly blamed of proude
piefumptuoufnefle. I would 10 God they were buried jn dede/o that
this
God the Creator. Lib.i. 38
this faith were agreed of all men , that the Father and the Sonne, and
the Holy ghoft be one God:and yec that the Father is not the Sonne,
nor the Holy ghoft the Sonnejbut diftind by certaine propretic. Yet
am I not fo precife, that lean finde in my harteto Itnuc for bare
wordes. For I note,that the olde fathers,which otherwife fpcake very
religioufely of fuch matters , did not euery where agree one with an
other, nor euery one with himfelfe. For what formes of fpeech vfcd
by the councels doth Hilarie excufe? To how greate hbertie doth
Auguftme fometimc bfeake forth? How vnlike are the Grekcs to the
Latins ? But of this variance one example fhall fuffife for this time.
Whe the Latins met to expreCTe the worde Omooulion, they called it
Confubftanciall, declaring the fubftance of the Father and the Sonne
to be one,fo vHngthe word fubftance for efltnce-Whervpo Hicrome
to Damafus faith, it is facrilege to fay , that there are three fubftanccs
in God:and yet aboue a hundred times you fhall finde in Hilaric , that
there are three fubftances in God . In the worde Hypoftafis , how is
Hierome accombred ? For he fufpedeth that there lurketh poifon in
naming three Hypoftafes in God. And if a man do vfe this word in a
godly fenfe, yet he plainly faith that is an impropre fpeech,if he fpakc
vnfamcdly,and did not rather wittingly and wiUingly feeke to charge
the bifhoppes of the Eaftlandes , whom he fought to charge with an
vniuft fciaundcr. Sure this one thin^ he fpeaketh not very truely, that
in all prophane fchoolcs , oufia , eflence is nothing ds but hypoftafis,
which is proued falfe by the common and accuftomed vfe. Auguftine Dc tr
is more modeft and gentill.which although he fay,that the worde hy- "ifh.
poftafis in that fenfe is ftrange to latine eares , yet fo farre is it of that "^' ^
ne taketh f»om the Grekes their vfuall maner of fpeaking,that he alfo
gently bcareth with the Latins that had followed the Greke phrafe.
And that which Socrates writeth in the fixte booke of the Tripartite
hiftorie,tendeth to this end, as though he ment that he hadde by vn-
f kilful men bin wrongfully applied vnto this mattcr.Yea and the fame p^ ^j
Hilarie himfelfe laycth it for a great fault to the hcretikes charge, that ni.iib.
by their waywardneiTe he is compelled , to put thofe thinges in pcrill
of the fpeech of men , which ought to haue bin kept in the religiouf-
neflc of mindes, plainly confeffing that this is to do thinges vnlau-
full, to fpeake that ought not to be fpoken , to attempt thinges not li-
cenced. A little afterjhe cxcufeth himfelfe with many wordes,for that
he was fo boldc to vtier new names For after he had vfed the naturall
names Father, Sonne, and Holy ghoft , he addeth that whai foeucr is
fought further, is beyond the compafle of fpeach, beyond the reach
of fcnfe,and beyonde thecapacitieof vnderftanding.And in an other
Cap. 13. Of the knowledge of
pUce he faith,that happy arc the bi(hops of Galha, which neithtr had
nor receiued nor knew any other confelTion,buc that olde and fimplc
oncjwhich fro the time of the Apoftles was rccciucd in all Churches.
And much Hke is the excufe of Auguftine, that this worde was wrong
outofneccHicicbyreafonoftheimperfedioofmens language in Co
great a matter : not to expreffc that which is, but that it fliould not be
vnfpoken how the Father , the Sonne, and the Holy ghoft are three.
This modeftie of the holy mcnne ought to warne vs , that we do not
forthwith (o feuerely like Cenforsjnote them with infamic thatrefufc
to fubfcribe and fweare to fuch wordes as we propounde themifo that
they do it not of pride,of frowardnefle,or of malicious crafte. But let
them againe conliderjby how great neceflicic we arc driuen to fpeakc
fo , that by httle and littlcj they may be enured with that profitable
tnancr of fpeach . Let them alfo iearne to beware , lealt fith we muft
mete on the one fide with the Arnans , on the other fide with SabcU
lians, while they be offended that we cut ofoccafion from them both
to cauilljthey bring themfelues in furpicion,that they be the difciples
cither of Arrius or of Sabcllius. Arrius faith that Chrift is God,but he
muttercth that he was create, and had a beginning. He faith Chrift is
one with the Father, but fccretcly he whifpcretb in the cares of his
difciplesjthathe was made one as the other faithfull be , although by
fingular prerogatiue. Say ones that Chrift is Confubftanciall with his
father, then plucke you of his vifour from the difremblcr,and yet you
addc nothing to the Scripture, Sabellius faith.that the feuerall names.
Father , Sonne , and Holy ghoft fignifie nothing in God fcuerally di'
ftind : fay that they are threeiand he will cry out that you name three
gods. Say that there is in one effence a Trinitie of perfong ,then fhall
you in one word both fay, what the Scripture rpeakcth,and ftop their
vaine babbling . Now if any be holdcn with fo curious fuperftition,
that they can not abide thefe names : yet is there no man, though he
would neuer fo faine , that can deny but that when we heare of one,
we muftvnderftand an vnitie of fubftance:when we heare of three in
one elTence,that itis ment of the perfons in the trinitie. Which thing
being without fraude confeifed, we ftay no longer vpon wordes . But
I haue Ions; ago found,3nd that often,that who foeuer do obftinate-
ly quarell about wordes , do keepe within themafccretc poifon : fo
that It is better willingly to prouoke them , than for their plcafuie to
(peake darkly.
6 But leauing difputation of wordes I will now begin to fpeake of
the matter it felfe.l call therfore a Perfone,a fubiiftence in the eflencc
of God,which hauing rclatio to the other is diftinguifhed from them
with
God the Creator. Lib.i. 3^
with vncomunicable proprctie. By the name of bubfiHecc we mcanc
an other thing than the eflence.For if the worde had fimply bin God,
andin thcmcanetime hadnothingfcuerally proprc toitlelle, lohn
haddc faid amifle.that is was with God.Where lie forthwith addeth,
that God himfelfc was the fame worde , he calleih vs backe againe ro Iobn»i«
^ one (ingle effence. But bccaufc it coulde not be with God,bu£ that ''
it mult rcll in the father : hereof arifeth that (ubfiftecc, which though
it be ioyned to the elfencc with an vnfeparable knotjyet hath it a fpe-
ciall markcjwherby it doth differ from it. So of the three fubfiftcces,
I fay that cche hauing relation to other is in propretic diftinguiihed.
Relation is here cxprcifely mencioned. For when there is (imple and
indefinite mencion made of God,ihis name belongeih no Icfle to the
Sonne and the Holy ghoft , than to the Father . But when the Father
is compared with the Sonnejthe feucral propretie of either doth d\C~
cerne him from the other. Thirdely,what foeuer is propre vnto eue*
ry of them is vnc5municable. For chat which is geucn to the Father Lib.cS-
for a marke of difference , can nor agree with , nor be geucn to the f*"^ P""**
Sonne. And I miflike not the definition of Tertullian, (o that it be ^^^"*'
rightly taken , That there is in God a certaine difpotition or diftribu-
tion,which yetchaungeth nothing of the vnitie of th*clf>:nce.
7 But before that I go anyfurther,it.isgoodthat I proucj he God-
head of the Sonne and of the Holy ghoft.Then after we fhal fce,hovf
they diflcr one from an other. Surely whc the Worde of God is fpo«
ken of in the Scripture : it were a very grcate abfurditie to imagine i*
only a fading and vanifliing voice, which fente into the ayre, cometh
out of God himfelfc , of which fort were the oracles geucn to the fa-
thers,and all the prophecics:when rather the worde is menre to be the
perpctuall wifdom abiding with the Father , from whens ajl the ora-
cles and prophecies proceded.For as Peter tefti(itth,no lefic didde the *• ^*^*'»
oldc prophetes fpeake with the fpirite of Chrift , than did the Apo- **'
ftlcs and all they that after them did diftribute the heauenly dodrine.
But becaufc Chrift was not yet openly fhewed , wc muft vnderftand
that the Worde was before«ill worldes begotten of the Father. And if
the Spirit e was of the Worde , whofe inftrumcntes were the prophe-
tes , we do vndoutedly gather that he was true god . And this doth
Mofes teach plainly enough "in the creation of the worlde, when he
fetteth the worde as the meane. For why doth he expreffely tcU, that
God in creating of all his workes faid.Be this done;or that done : but
that the vnferchable glory of god may fhiningly apperc in his images?
The futtlenofed & babbhng men do cafily mocke our this,with fayin<»
that the name Worde, is there taken for his bidding or cocamaundc-
Cap.13. Of the knowledge of
Heb.i. mcme. But better expoficors are the Apoftles , which teach that the
•• worldes were made by the fame, and that he fuftcineth them all with
his mighty Worde. For here we fee that the Worde is taken for the
bidding or commaundemcnt of the Sonrje,which is himfelfe the etei-
nall and <:ffcntiaU Worde to the Father. And to the wife and fobre it is
Ecclcf. '^ot darke that SaIom5 faith,where he bringeth in Wifdom begotten
t4,u. of God before all worldcs,and bearing rule in the creation of thinges,
and in all the workes of God . For to fay that it was a certain e com-
maundement of God , feruing but for a time , were very foohlli and
, vaine : where as in deedc it was Goddes plcafure at that time to HiCw
forth his ftedfalt and etcrnall purpofe , yea and fome thing more fe-
j . Crete. To which entente alfomakech that faying of Chrift: MyFa-
,- * * ther and I do worke cuen to this dale. For in (aying , That from the
beginning of the worlde he was continually working with his Fa-
ther, he doth more openly declare that which Mofes hadde more
fhortely touched. We gather then that the meaning of Goddes fpca-
king was this , that the Worde hadde his office in the doing of thin-
ges , and fo they both had a common woorking togither . Butmoft
plainly of all doth lohn fpcake,whe he (heweth that the fame Word,
which from the beginning was God with God, was together with
God the Father the caufe of all thinges . For he both geueth to the
John. I , Worde a perfed and abiding effence , and alfo aillgneth vnto it fome
J* thing peculiar to it ftlfe , and plainly fheweth how God in fpeaking
was the creator of the worlde. Therefore as all reuclacions preceding
from God do well beare the name of the worde of God, fo ought we
yet to fet in the hyeft place that fubftanciall Worde , the wcllfpring
of all Oracles,which beins; fubied to no alreracion , abideth alwaies
one and the felfe fame with God, and is God himfelfe.
8 Here many dogges do barke againft vs , which when they dare
not openly take from him his Godhead , do fccrcily fteale from him
his Eternitie . For they fay , that the Worde then began firft to be,
when God in the creation of the world opened his holy mouth . But
verie vndifcretly 60 they to imagine a ceriaine innouacion of the fub-
flaunce of God. For as thofe names of God that haue relacion to his
oijf.vard worke, began to be geuen vnto him after the being of his
worke , as for example , this that he is called the creator of heaucn
and earth : fo doth Godlmefle know or admitt no name that fliould
fignific any new thing in himfelfe to haue chaunced vnto God. For if
any (liould come to him from els where than in himfelfe , then this
faying of I?»mes (houldfaile, that euery good, geuing and euery per-
fc^ gift is from abouc , and commctn dov/nc from the Father of
lightes.
God the Creator. Lib. i . 40
Jightes , witii vrhom is no variablencflc neither fhadowing by tur-
ning.Therfore nothing is lefle to be fufji cd.than to faine a beginning
ofthat Wordc,which both alway was Gqd,anJ afterwardc was crea-
tor of the worldc . But full futielly forfooih they reafon, that Mofes
in faying that God then firft fpake , doth fecretly llicw that there was
no Worde in him before. Which is a moft ti) fling argument . For it
followeth not , becaule a thing at fome one certainc time beginncth
to be fijewed openly, that therefore it had neucr.anyJbeyng before.
But I coclude farrc otherwifc and fay:feyng that in the fame momenic Gen.i,
that God faied , let light be made, the power of the worde appeared 3.
andfheweditfelfe: the fame Worde was loiig before, but if a man
af ke how long before, he fhall finde no beginning. For he appointed
no certaine fpace of time when him felfc faied : Father glorifie me
with the glory which I had with thee before ihe worlde was . And
this thing lohnalfo left not untouched , becaufe he firft fhewcth that ° **^*
in tlic beginning the worde was with God , before that he commeth
to the creation of the worlde. We fay therfore againe,that the Worde
which was concerned of God before any beginning of time, was con-
tinually remaining with him. Whcrby both his ecanitie}true eff^ncc,
and Godhead is proued.
9 Although I do not yet touch the pcrfonofthe Mediator, but do
deferre it to that place where we {hall fpecially cntrcate of the Re-
dempcion : yet becaufe it ought to be certainly holden without con-
trouerfie among all men , that Chrift is the fame Worde clad with
flefh, in this place will be very fitte to recite all thofc teftimonies that
proue Chrift to be God. Whe it is fayed in the xlvr.Pfalme,thy throne -
O God is for etier and eucr : the lewes do cauill and fay , that the ^^* *^
name Elohim is alfo apphed to the Angels and (buerai^ne powers.
But in all the Scripture there is not a like place, that rai(^th aneter-
n.ill throne to any creature. For he is here not (imply called God,but
alfo the eternall Lord. Againc , this title is giiien to none but with £3^ - ,
an addicion , as it is faied : that Mofes (halbc for a God to Pharao.
Some rede it in the Genitiue cafe which is veryfoolifti. Igrauntin
dcrdc that oftentimes a thing is called Diuine or of God , that is no-
table by any (insular excellence : but here by the tenour of the textc
it appearcth , that fuch a meaning were harde and forced , and will
not agree. But if their ftubborneffc will not fo vclde : In Efiie is very
plainly brought in for all one both Chrift and God , and he that is
adorned with the (oueraigne power , which is properly belonging to
God alone. This (faicth he) is the nanie whcrby they fliall call hjm, ECa.jf.^.
the ftrong God,thc Father of the world to comcj&c.Hcre the Icwes
Cap.i 3 . Of the knowledge of
barcKc againe, and turne the texte thus : this is the name whereby the
ftionge God the father of the worlde to come fliall call him : fo that
they leaue this onely to the!Sonne to be called the Prince of peace .
But CO what purpofc lliould fo many names of addicion in this place
be heaped vpon Gad the Father ,feyng it is the purpofe of the Pro-
phctc to adorne Chnft with fuch fpeciall notes as may builde our
Faith vpon him ? Wherefore it is out of dout that he is here in like
forte called the ftrong God , as he is a httle before called Immanuel.
But nothing can be founde plainer than that place of Hieremie where
Icrc.23. h^.(3y^,j;h, that thisfhall be the name whereby the fedeof Dauid
fliall be called lehouah our righteoufnefl'e. For where the lewes the-
felues do teach, that all other names of God are but adiediue names
g ^' 42- of addicion , and that this onely name lehouah which they call vn-
fpeakable is a fubftamiuc name to cxprefTc his cflTence: we gather that
the Sonne is the onely and eternall God, which faith in an other place
that he v/iU not geuc his glory to an other , But here alfo they feke to
fcape away becaufe that Mofes gaue that name to the Altare that he
bilded , and Ezechiel gaue it to the new citie Hierufalem . But who
doth not fee that the Altare was builded for a monumente that God
was the auauncement of Mofes , and that Hierufalem is not adorned
with the name of Gud , but onely to teftifie the prefence of God ?
Ei?.}8. For thus faycth the Prophete. The name of the citie fromthatday
5 S- Oialbc lehouah there. And Mofes faith thus.He builded an altare and
txo.iy. called the name of it, lehouah my exaltacion. But more bulineflc
!^* arifech by an other place of Hieremie , where the fame tittle is ap-
jg^ * plied to Hierufalem in thefe wordes : this is the name whereby they
fliall call her lehouah our righteoufnefle . But thi? teftimony is fo
farre from making againft the trueth which we defende , that it ra-
ther confirmeth it . For wheras he had before teftificd that Chrift is
the true lehouah from whom floweth righteoufnefle , now he pro-
nounccth that the Church lliall fo verely felc the fame, that fhe may
glorioufly vfc the very name it felfe. And fo in the firft place is fet the
fountaine and caufe of rightcoufneffe, in the other the cflfed.
TO Now if this do not fatisfie the lewcs , that lehouah is fo oft .
prcfcntcd in the perfonne of an Angell , I fee not with what cauilla-
tionsthey canmockeitout. It is faied that the Angell appeared to
lud 6 7 ^^^ ^°'y fathcrsrand the fame Angel chalengeth to himfelfethc name
of the eternall God. If any take exception and fay, that this is fpoken
in refped of the Perfon that he reprefenrcth : this knotte is not thus
lud ij.^''^^^* ^^^ being a feruauntc he would not fuftbr Sacrifice to be of-
1 0. fercd 10 him and take from God his due honour. But the Angell re-
fufing
God the Creator. Lib.i. 41
fufing to eate bread, commandeth Sacrifice to be offered to Ichouah.
And then he proucih that himfelfe indeedewas the fame iehouah,
and therefore Manoah and his wife by this token did gather, that
they had feen not an only Angel bat God . And thence came it that
he fayed : we fhall die becaufe wc haue leen God. And when his wife
aunfwerech, if lehouah would haue flayen vs , he would not h^ue re-
ceaued Sacrifice at our handes : in this fiie doth confeffc that he was
God which before was called the Angell. Belide this,thc aunfwere of
the Angell himfelfe takcth away all doubt of it, faying : why doeft
thou afke me of my name, which is maruellous ? So much che more
deteftable was the wickednefle of Seruetto , when he afBiq^cd that
God neuer appeared to Abraham and the other fathers, but|fhat an
Angell was worfliipped in place of him . But truely and wifely haue
the true teaching dodors of the Church expounded, that the fame
principall Angell was the worde of God, which then as aforehande
began to execute the office o/ Mediatour . For though he was not
yet clothed with flefli , yet he came downe as a meanc betwenc God
and men, to come more familiarly to the faithfull. Therefore his iiic
communicating himfelfe made him to be called an Angell: yctftill
in the meane time he reteined that which was his own, to be the God
of vnfpeakable glory.Thc fame thing meaneth Ofeas,which after he ofe. n,
had recited the wraftling of Jacob with the Angell, fayeth ; lehouah 5.
the God of hoftes, lehouah , worthy of memory is his name. Here
againe Seruetto carpeth,that God did beare the pcrfon of an Angell.
As though the Prophetc did not cofirme that which Mofes had faied;
why doeft thou afke me of my name? And the confetfion of the holy
Patriarche doeth fufficienily declare that he was not a created Angell,
but one in whom the full godhead was rcfidente,whcn he faid: I haue Ge . j 2,
feen God face to face . And for this caufe Paule fayeih , that Chnft '^^ .
was guide of the people in the wildernefl'e . For though the time was 10. ^ '.
not yet come of his abacemente: yet that eternall woidefliewed a z^ch.i.
figure of that office to which he was appointed . Now if the feconde }•
Chapter of Zacharie be weyed without contencion , the Angell ihat
fente an other Angell was byandby pronounced to be the God of
hoftes, & to him is foueraigne power afcribed. I omitte innumerable
teftimonies on the which our Faith fafcly icftech , although they do
not much moue the lewes. For when it is faicd in Efaie. Behplde this ^(^ ^^
is our Godjthis is Iehouah,we fliall waire vpon him) and he fhall faue ^,
vs, they that haue eyes may fee , that herein is meant God which ry-
feth vp for the faluation of his people. And thefe vehement demon-
ftracioQstwife repetcd (u0er it to be drawcn nO otherwhere but to
F
Cap.13. Of the knowledge of
Ial.j.< Chnii And yet plainer and fuller is the place ot Malachie where he
promifeth chac he iTiall come the Lord that was then defired , to his
ovmc templf". But to none but to the onely foucraigne God wasthc
temple dedicate , which temple yet the Prophet dorhe clatme for
Chrill:. VVherevpon folioweth that Chiift is the fame God that was
c
uer honored amon^the lewes^
o
1 V As for the newc Teftament,it fwarmeth with innumerable tc-
ftimonicSjtherfore we Ji^uft trauaile rather fhortly to choofc out fewc,
than largely to heape vp all. For though the Apofties fpeake of him
(ince he was now become the Mediatour in fle(h : yet all that I fhall
bring forth fhall aptly ferue to prouc his godhead. Firit this is worthy
to be iwigularly marked, that ihofe thinges which were before fpokcn
touching the eternall God , the Apofties do (hew that they are either
already performedjor hereafter to be performed in Chrift. For where
;fa,8. Efaie prophecieth that the Lord of hoftcs {halbe to the lewesand
4. Ilraeiitcs a ftombling ftone and a rockc to fall vpon : Paulc affirmeth
iom. 5>. rhat the fame is fulnlled in Chiift. Therefore he declarcth him to be
^4 the Lord of h:>ftes, Likewife in an other place. We muft all (faith he)
^^''^ ones be broughcto appeare before the iudgement throne of Chrift.
ifa 5 5 . For it is written, to me fhall all knees bow,and to me fhall all tongues
*i' fwere. Seing God in Efay fpeaketh this thing of himfelfe , and Chiift
in dede pcrformeth it in himfelfv,it folioweth that he is the felfe fame
God whoes gloiy may not be withdrawen to an other. And that thing
5phc.4. which writmg to the Ephcfianshc allegeth out of the Pfalmes,is eui*
^ dent that it can be applied to none but to God alone . Afcendingon
^fal. )7 .|^^ j^g \\2ith caried captiuitie captiue,meaning that fuch afcending was
'^* in (hadowe Ihewed , when God in notable vidory againft forein na-
tions did fliewe forth his power, but he declareih that in Chrift it
lohn I. ^^^ tnorc fully performed . So lohn teftiHeth that it was the glory of
(4. the Sonne that was reueled to Efay by a vifion , wheras in decdc the
Ela.(S..i. Prophet himfelfe wryteth that the maieftieof God appeared vn*
to him . And it is euident that thofc thinges which the Apoftle wry-
Heb.i. ting to the Hcbrues applteth to the Sonne, arc the plaine titles of
10. and God. as: Thou Lord in the beginning diddeft laie the foundacions
^' of heauen and earch. &c. Againe worfhip him all ye his Angels. And
yet he abuftth not thofe titles when he drawcth them to Chrift. For
all thofe thine;cs that are fpokcn of m thofe Pfalmes , he himfelfe
. alo.'ic hath fulfilled. For it was he that rofe vp and had mercy on S16.
3t was he that claimed to himUlfe the kingdome of all the nations
loh.i.i. and jlandes.And why (hould lohn fticke to apply the maieftie of God
to Chnft which in his preface had fayed that the worde was alwaic
Gtid>
God the Creator. Lib.i. 42
God ? Why fhould Paulc feare to fee Chrift in the judgement throne i.<"«r.
of God, hauing before with fo open prodamacio declared his God- J"*^
head,where he faied chat he was God blefled to the ende of wot Ides? j **
And to make appeare , how well he agreeth in tliis pointe with him-
ftlfe , in an other place he writech that Chrift i5> God openly (hewed
in the flelh. If he be God to be prayfed to the ende of worldes, then , ^^^ ^
he is the fame he to whom in an other place he affirmeth all glorie kj.
and honour to be due. Andthus he hidethnot, but plainely crieth
out, that he would haue counted it no robberyif hehad fhewed ,/rim i
himfelfe egall with God, but that he willingly abaced himfelfe. And 1 7
that the wicked ihculdnot carpeihathe is fomemade God, lohn Pfii^.6.
goeth further and faith. He is the true God and the cternall life. Al- ^o*^" >-
though it ought aboundantly to latisfic vs, that he is called God, fpe-
cially of that witncfle which exprefly affirmeth vnro vs that there
are no moe goddes butone.That fame witnefTe is Paule,which faicth J'^**^"
thus:How many focucr be called goddes either in hcauen or in earth, , -j-iri,
to vs there is but one God from whom arc all thinges. When we 3.16
hcarc of the fame mouth , that God was openly (hewed in the flcdi, ^^^>o.
that God with his owne bloud purchafed the Church to himfelfe: ^°'
why (hould we imagine a feconde God which he himfelfe acknow- ^*^ ""
ledgcth not ? And it is no doute that all the godly were of the fame
meaning. Likewife Thomas in protcfting him to be hisLordeand
his God , doth profefTe that he is that onely one God whom he had
alway worfhipped.
II Now if we eftecmehis Godhead by the workes that in the
Scripture are afcribed vnto him , it (hall thereby more euidentlie ap-
peare. For when he faied that from the beginning he was ihetherto
working with his father : the lewes which were moft dull in vnder- Iohn.5.
(landing of all his other fayinges , yet then perceiued that he tokc *^*
vpon him the power of God . And therefore , as lohn tellcth , they
fought the more to kill him , becaufe he diddc not onely breake the
Sabbat > but alfo did call God his father , making himfelfe egall with
God. How dull (hall we be the,if we do not perceiue that his godhead
is herein plainly affirmed ? And truely to order the worldc with pro-
uidence and power, and to gouerne all thinges with the auihoritie of
his owne might, which the Apoftle afcribeth vnto him,belongeih to ^.^ ^
none but onely to the creator. And he not onely entcrparteneih the
gouernement of the worlde with his Father, but alfo all other offices
which can not be made comon to God with his creatures. The Loid
crieth out by the Prophet : I am he . I am he , that doc away thine KTa 45,
offences for mine owne fake . Accordifig to the meaning of this fen- *>' ■
F ij
Cap. 13. Of the knowledge of
tence when the lewes thoug!?t that wronge was done to god for that
Iat.5). Chrift did forgcue finnes.Chrift not onely affirmed in wordes but alfo
proued by miracle that this power bc^longed vnto himfelfe . We fee
thcrfore that he hath,not the miniftracion,but the power of forgeuc-
neife of finncs , which the Lord faieth he will not fuftcr to pafle away
^^'^' from himfelfe to any . Whatfhallwe fay of fearching and pearling
the fecrete thoughtes of hartes ? is it not the propretie of god alone ?
But the fame had Chriftrwhcrby is gathered that he is God.
I J Now, in his miracles how plainly and clerely doth he appcare?^
And though I graunte that as well the Prophetes as the Apoftles did
egall and like miracles to thefe that he did : yet this great difterence
is there , that they by their miniftracion difpofcd the giftes of God,
he (hewed forth his owne power . He vfed fometime prayer , to the
cnde to gcuc glory vnto his Father. But we fee for the moft part his
owne power fhewed vnto vs . And how coulde it othcrwife be but
that he was the very author of nuracles that by his owne authoritc
klat.io. gaue power to other to deale miracles abrodc?For the Euangchft de-
'• clareth that he gaue power to the Apoflics to rayfe vp the dead , to
*rlar.3. healc the leprous, tocalloutdeuils. &c. And they fo vfed themini-
j *„^ ftracion therof that they fufficietly fhewed that this power came not
^a. J.6 from els where but from Chrill. In the nameof lefus Chrift ( faieth
oh. s. Peter) Rife and walke . It is thcrfore no maruell if Chrift alleged his
Itf.and miiacles to confound the viibelcuingneflc of the lewes: forafmuch as
ind.14 ^^^y "^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^ being done by his owne power did geue a mofl;
11, * ' plaine teftimonie of his godhead . If els where then in God there is
no raluacion,no righteoufnefre,no liferand Chrift conteineth all thefe
thinges in him,furely he is thereby declared to be God. And no man
can obieft againft me and fay, that hfe and faluacio is poured into him
by God : for it is not faied that he receyucd faluacion but that he is
faluacion himfelfe. And if none be good but onely God : how can he
be onely man, beyng I will not fay good and iuftc,but felfe goodneirc
Mat.i^. ^"^ '"ft' c^ ' Y^3 ^^^'^ f h^ '^""ft beginning of the creation as the Euan-
17. gelifte witneflcth in him was life ; and he euen then beyng life was
[oh.f.4. the lic;ht of men, VVherfore being fupported with fuch proues we arc
*4. bolde to rcpofe our faich and hope in him: when yet we know that it is
Efa. 26. 3fi vngodhnefte thzi robbeth God for any man to faften his confidece
1 6. in creatures . Beleue ye in God ? fayeth he . Bcleue then alfo in me.
Eiay.ii. And fo doth Paule expounde thofetwo places of Efay, Whofoeuer
'^' trufteth in him (hall not be put to fhame. Againe.Out of the roote of
ii.ana Ifai (hall he come that fhall rife to rule peoples , in him the nations
15.11. ftiall :ruft.And why lliould we feke out more teftimonies of Scripture
for
God the Creator. .'Lib.i. 43
for this matter , whence fo ofcen mete with this lentence? He that
beleueth in mc hath euerbfting hfc. Morcouerthe inuocation which
hangeth vpon Faith belongeih alfo to him, which yet is proper to
the maieftie of God if he haue any thing at ail proper to himfelfe. For °' **
one Prophete fayeth : whofoeuer calleth vpon the name of lehoua pr.ig.
Ihaibe Taucd ; and an other fayeth :amoft ftronge toure is the name lo.
of lehouah : to it the righteous fliall flee and he (halbe faued , but the
name of Chrift is called vpon for faluacion : it followeih therfore that A^-7'
he IS lehouah. As for inuocacion , we haue an example of k in Ste- ^^^^
phen, when he fayeth. Lord lefu receiue my fpirite . Againeinihe j^^
whole Church , as Ananias teftifieth in the fame booke.Lord (fayeth ^
he ) thou knoweft how great euiJIthis man hath done to thy Saintes
that call vpon thy name. And that it may be more plainly vnderftan-
ded that the whole fulnefle of the Godhead doth corporally dwell
in Chrift, the Apoftle doth confefle that he brought no other do-
ftrine among the Corinthians but the knowledge of him , and that ^'^^^»
he preached no other thing but that knowledge . What , I pray you,
and how great a thing is this, that the name of the Sonne oiitly is
preached vnto vs whom he willeih to glory in the knowledge of him-
felfe alone ? Who dare fay that he is but a creature ^ of whom the ^ ^^•9"
onely knowledge is our whole glorie ? Beiidc that, the falutacions fet '^'
before the EpiHles of Paule, wilh the fime benefites from the Sonne
which they do from the Father, wherby we are taught not onely that
thofe thinges which the Father geueth vs do come vnto vs by his
interccflion , but alfo by communitie of power, he is the author of
them. Which knowlj^dge by pradife is without doutc more certaine
and perfeft than any idle-fpcculacion. For there the godly my ndc
doth beholde Gad moft prefent , and in maner handle him , where
it fecleth it felfe to be quickened, lightened , faued, iuftitied and fan-
dified.
14 Wherfore out of the fame fountaines we mijfl: fetch our meanc
of prouing to conlirme the Godhead of the Holy ghoft , Very plaine
is the teftimonie ofMofes iaihe hiftory of the creacion, that the fpi- *'**'**
rite of God was vpon the depthes , or vpon the vnfafliioned hcape:
bccaufe he flieweth that not onely the beautie of the vyorlde that is
now to be feen ispreferued by the power of the Spirite , but ere this
beautie was added,the Spirite was then bufied in preferuing that con-
fufed lumpe of thinges , And that faying of Efai e cannot be cauilled
againft. And now lehouah and his Spirite hath feni me. For he com- ** '^
muntcatefh with the Holy ghoft his chiefe power in fending of Pro-
phctes. Whereby appearcth the diuine maieftie of the Hvly ghoft.
F iij.
Cap. 13. Of the knowledge of
But our bcft proufe , as Lhaue faid , Oialbe by familiar vfe . For that
which the Scriptures impute vnto it, isfarre from rhe propertic of
creatures , and fuch a thing as we our felues do learne by allured ex-
perience of godlinelTe . For he it is that being echc where poured
abrode, dothfufteine and geuerh growing and life to all thingesin
heauen and in earth . An by this pointe he iis proued to be none of
the number of creatures, for that he is not comprehended within any
boundes: but by pooring his liuely force into all thinges to breath
into them life and mocion,this is the very worke of God. Morcouer^
if regeneracion into an incorruptible hfe be better and more exceilec
than any prefent quickening : what ftall wc iudge of him from whofc
power the fame procedeth? And thWhc is the author of regenerac]5,
not by a borrowed , bunby his owne force, the Scripture in many
places teacheth '. and not ofthat onely , but alfo of the immortal.tie
to come. Finally, as vnto the Sonne , fo vnto him alfo are applied all
ihofe offices that are moft of ail properly belonging to the God-
head. For hcfearcheththe depe fecretesofGod, wherewith none
of all the creatures is of counfel . He geueth wifdome and f kill to
fpcake , wheras yet the Lord pronounccth to Mofes that it is onely
his worke to do it. So by him we come to a partaking of God, fo that
we rriay fcle hts power as it were working life in vs . Our luftification
is his worke. From him is power, fandtfication , truth , grace , and
what good thing foeuer may be thought of, becaufc it is the Holy
ghoft onely from whom procedeth all kinde of giftes . For that (en-
tcnce of Paule is righte worthy to be noted . Although there be di-^
uerfe giftes, and manifolde and fondry is th^diftribucion of them,
yet is there but one holy Spirite: becaufe he maketh him not onely
the originall or beginning, but alfo the author. Whiche a httle
Cor. after is more plainely exprefled in thefe woordes. One and the fame
~>i- Spirite diftrybuterh all thinges ashewill. For if he were notfome
thing fubfifting in God , he woulde not attribute vnto him choife
of mindeand will. Therefore mofte euidently doth Paule geue to
the Holy ghoft diuine power , and fheweth that he is fubftantially rc-
fidcntinGod.
, ^^ '. I ^ And the Scripture it felfe,when it fpcakcth of him, forbcareth
, j^ not the name of God . For Paule hereby gathereth that vw arc the
( or. temple of God, becaufe his fpirite dwellcth in vs : which thing is not
.16. lightly 10 be pafled ouer. For wheras God fo often promifeth that
."^ ^^ he wil chofe vs for a temple to himfelfejthat promifc is no other way
^ ^ p, fulfilled, but by his fpinle dwelling in vs , Surely , as Auguftine very
6. well faieth : i{ we were commaunded to tiuke vnto the Holy ghoit
a tern*
Vjod me creator. J^ib.i. . 44
1 temple of timber and ftoiie becaufe fuch wcfliip is due to God
onely , it were a clcarc argument that he is God : now therforc how
much clearer is this , that we ought, not to make a temple, but our
feluestobe atemple for. him ? Andthe Apoftle himfelfe callethvs
(bmetimethe temple of Godjfometime the temple of theHoly gholK
both in one meaning. And Peter reprehending Ananias for that he
had lied to the Holy ghoft , faid that he lied not vnio men but vnto
God. And where Efay bringeth in the Lord of hoftesfpeakingjPaule Efa.<f.p
teacheth that it is the Holy ghoft that fpcakeih. Yea where common- ;Aa. 28.
ly the Piophetes fay, that the wordes which they vtter are the wordes *^*
of the Lord of hoftes , Chrift and the Apoftles do refcrre them ro
the Holy ghoft.Whcrby it foliowcth that he is the true lehouah that
is the chiefe author of prophecies. Againe where God complaineth
that he was prouoked to wrath by the ftubbornefle of his people , in
fteade of that Efay faith that his holy Spirite was grecued. Lalleof Erj.4|.
all, if blafphcmie ag^jinft the Holy gholl be not foigtuen in this 10.
worlde iiorin the wo.ldeto come , whereas he may pbteine pardon ''^'■^'•i**
that hath blafphemed againft the Sonne : his diuine maieftic is here ^^'^
plainly proued^ the cffenfe or diminilliment wherof is an vnpardon- z^. '
able crime. I do wittingly and ofpurpofe omittemsny leftimonics Lukiu
that the auncient writers haue vfed. They haue thought it a marudU. ^ v
ous mete place to alleage out of Dauid ; with the wordc of the Lord ^^'^ f*
the heauens were ftablifhed,and all the power of them with the fpirite
of his mouth, to proue that the woxlde was no Iclfe the worke of the
Holy ghoft than of the Sonne. But forafmuch as it is commonly yfed
inthePfalmestorepetcone thinge iwife: and in E(ny the fpirite of ^*'^*
his mouth is as much 10 fay as his worde ,,that reafon is very weake.
Therefore I thought good to touche a fewe fuche ihinges as godly
mindes might foundly reft vpon.
16 And as God hath more plainly difclofedhimfeKe by the com-
ming of Chrift, fo is he alfo in the three Perfons become more fa-
mihai ly knowen . But of all the tcftimoniesktte this one fuffice vs
for this prcfent.Paule fo knitteth thefe thrc together, God,Faith,and ^P'4 %
Baptifme, that he rcaroneih from the one to the other in this man^r,
Becaufe there is but one Faith , he thereby flieweth that there is but
one God. And becaufe there is but one God,he therby proueih that
there is but one Faith . Therefore if we be entred into the Faith and
rehgion of one God by Baptifme : we muft nedes thinke him the true
Oodin whofe name we are baptifed. And it is not to be douted , but
that in this folemneproteftacion, Chrift meant toteftifie that the
pcrfed light of Faith was already deliuered j when he faied : Bapiifc
F iiij.
^5c.a8 them in the name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the Holy
> ghoft. For it is as much in efFed as to be baptifed in the name of the
one God, which with perfed brightnefTe hath appeared in the Fa-
ther, the Sonne and the Holy ghoii. Whcrby is euident that in the
efience of God abide three Perfons in which the one God is knowen.
And furelyjforafmuch as our Faith ought not to looke hether & the-
ther,nor diucifly to wader about^but to hauc regard to the one God,
to be applied to him, & to ftickc faft in him:it is hereby eafily proued,
that if there be diuerfe kindes of 'faith,there muft alfo be many gods.
Nowwheras baptifmeis a Sacrament of faith ; it proueth vntovs
the vnicie of God , bccaufeit is but one. And hereof alfo followeth,
that ii: is not lawfull to be baptifed but into one Godjbycaufe we em-
brace the Faith of him,inio whofe name we arc baptjfed.vVhac meant
Chrift then,whcn he commaunded to be baptifed,in the name of the
. Father , the Sonne,and the Holy ghoft , but that we ought with one
Faith to beleue in the'Father, Sonne, and the Holy ghoft ? Therefore
fithe this remaineth certain,that there is but one God,and not many,
we determine chat the Worde and the Spirite are nothing cis but the
very felfe eflcnce of God . And very foolillily did the Arrians prate,
which confelling the godh-^ad of the Sonne did take from him the
fubftartce of God. And fuch a like rage vexed the Macedonias , which
would haue to be vnderftaded by the Spirite, only the pftcs of grace
that are poured forth into men . For as wifdom , vnderftanding, pru-
dence , fortitude , fearcof Gdddo proccde from him : Co he onely is
^ the fpirite of wifdom, prudence, fortitude, and godlinefle. Yet is not
he diuided according to the diftribution'of his graces:biit how foeuer
they be dmerfcly dealt abroade , yet he remaineth one and the fame.
,- I
as the Apoftle faith.
1 7 A^aine,therc is fhcwed in the Scriptures a cettaine diftindion
of the Father, from the Worde , and of the Worde from the Spirite.
In difcufTmg whereof, howegreate religioufneffe and fobrietie we
oughte to vfe , the greatneffe of the mifterie it felfe doth admonifh
Tn fee- vs. And I very well like that faying of Gregorie Nazianxene : I can
?'J-"^' not thinkevpontheone, butby and by lam compafled about with
[>aptif. ff*^ brightneffc of the three : And I can not feuerally difcerne the
MO. three , but I am fodeinly dryuen backe to one . Whcrfore lette it nor
come in our mindes ones to imagine fuch a Trinitie of Perfons as may
hold our thought withdrawcn into feueralties , and doth not forthc-
with bringe vs againc to that vnitie. The names of Father, Sonne,
and Holy ghoft , do proue a true diftindion , that no man flioulde
thinke them to be beare names of addition, wherby God according
to
toWs workesisdiucrfly entitled: butyetitisadiftindion, notadi-
uifion.The places that we haue already citedjdo fhew that the fonne
hath a property diftind from the Father, becaufe the Word had not
bin with Godjif he had not bin an other thing than the Father: nei-
ther had he had his glory with the Father , but being diftind from
him. Likewife he doth diftinguiih himfelfe from the Fathcr,whcn he
faytbjthat there is an other which beareth him witneffe. And for this lohn. y
purpofe niaketh that which in an other place is fayd, that the Father j- & 8.
created all thinges by the Word, which he could not, but being after * ^*
a certaine maner diftind from him . Moreouer the Father came noc
downe into the earth,but he that came out from the Father.The Fa-
ther died not nor roafe againe, but he that was fent by him. Neither
yet did this diftindion beginne at the taking of fleHi : but it is mani-
feft that he was alfo before, the onely begotten in the bofome of the john. i.
Father.For who can abide to fay,that then the Sonne entred into the j 8.
bofome of the Father,when he defcended from heauen to take man -
hode vpon him ? He was therefore before in the bofome of the Fa- Toh. 14,
ther, andenioyedhis glory with the Father. As for the diftindion 6.1^.2^
oftheHolyghoft from the Father, Chrift fpeaketh ofit\vhenhe
fayth,that it procecdeth from the Father. And how oft doth he (hew
it to be an other befide himfelfe ? as whenhe promifethiluthe will , .
fend an other confortour, and often in other places. 16.
1 8 But to borow fimilitudes from matters of men, to expreffc the
force of this diftindion, I know not whether it be expedient.In dedc
the oldc fathers arc wont fo to do fomtime:but withail they do con-
fefle , that whatfoeuer they bring foorth for like , doth much differ.
For which caufc I am much afraid to be any way bold, leaft if I bring
foorth any thing vnfitiely , it (honld giuc occafion cither to the ma-
hcioustocauill, or tothe vnskilfuUtobe deceiued. Yet fuch diftin-
dion as we haue marked to be fettc out in Scriptures , it is not good
to haue left vnfpoken. And that is this,that to the Father is giuen the
beginning of working, the fountayne and fpring of all thinges : to the
Sonne wifdom, counfell^& the very difpofitio in the doing of things:
to the holy Holy ghoft is afTigned power and effeduall working. And
altiiough eternity belong vnto the Father,and eternity to the Sonne
and to the Holy ghoft alfo , for as much as God could oeuer haue
bin without his wifdbm & power,and in eternity is not to be foughr,
which was firft or laft : yet this obferuation of order is not vayne or
fupcrfluousjwherein the Father is reckened firft,and then of him the
Sonne, & after of them both the Holy ghoft. For euery mans mindc
of it fcifc encUneth to this , firft to conlidcr God , then the wifdom
riling
rifing ouc of him, and laft of all the power wberwich he puttcth the
decrees of his purpofe in execution. In what forte the Sonne is fayd
to be of the Father onely, and the Holy ghoft both of the Father and
the Sonne,is fhewed in many places,but nowhere more plainly than
in the viii.chapter to the Romancs,whcre the fame Spirite is without
<i;flferencc fometime called the Spirite of Chrift,& fometime of him
that raifed vp Chrift from the dead : and that not without caufe. For
Peter doth alfoteftifiethatit was the Spirite of Chrift wherewith the
Prophctes did prophecy , where as the Scripture fo often leacheih,
that It was the Spirite of God the Father.
19 Now this diftindio doth fo not djind againft the fingle vniiy of
God, that thereby we may prouc that the Sonne is one Gad with the
father,becaufe he hath one Spirit with him, & that the Holy Spirit 1$
not a thing diuers from the Father and the Sonne. For in ech Hypo-
ftafis is viidciftandcd the whole fubftance , with this that cuery one
loh. 14. hath his own proprety.The Father is whole in the Sonne,& the Son
io. is whole in the Father,as himfelfe affirmcch.I am in the Father & the
Father is in me. And the Ecclefiafticall wry ters do not graunt the one
Auguft. to be feuered fro the other by any difFercce of eflence-By thcfe names
bom.de that betoken diitindion(fayth Auguftine) that is ment wherby they
tempo, j^^yg relation one to an other, & not the very fubitancc wherby they
* are all one. By which meaning arc the fayingcs of the old wryters to
be made agree, which otherwife would feeme not a little to difagree.
For fometime they fay that the Father is the beginning of the Sonne,
& fomtime that the Sonne hath both godhead & eflence of himfelfe,
and is all one beginning with the Father. The caufe of this diucrhty
De rri- Auguftine dothjnan other place wcl & plainly declarCjwhe he faith;
Ditatc Chrift hauing refpcd to himfelfe, is called God,& to his Father is cal
& coll. led the Sonne. And againejthc Father as to himfelfe is called God,a$
tdpafce jQ y^ Sonne is called the Faihcr, where hauipg rcfpcfft to the Sonne
tui epi . ^^ .^ called the F3ihcr,he is not the Sonnc:& where as to the Father
Cyrjilus he is called the Sonne,he is not the Fath r:& where he is called as to
detrini. himfelfe the Father , and as to himftlfe the Sonne ; it is all one God,
li. 6.id€ jherefore when we (imply fpeake of the Sonne : without hauing re-
jt.j.dia- fpf^totf^e Father ,we do well & proprcly fay, that he is of himfelfe:
Aucuft. ^ thcrfore we call him but one beginning;but when we make meniio
in pial. of the relation betwene him and his Father,then we rightly make the
1 09- & Father thirbcgitming of the Sonne. All the whole fifth booke of Au-
"l^ '" guftine concerning the Trinity doth nothing but fetfoorththismat-
?9 ^^ ^^^- -^"^ "^"^^^ ^^^^ '^ '* ^° ""^^ *" '^^' relation that he fpcaketh o*^,
pfal.68. than into luitelly pearfing vnto the hie miftery to wander abroad by
c f many
God the Creator. Lib. i . 46
many vaync fpeculations.
zo Let them therefore that are pleafed with fobcrncfiTe , and con-
tented with meafure of Faith, Ihoi tly learne fo much as is profa'tablc
to be knowen:that is , when we profefle that we bele uc m one God,
vndcr the name of God,wc vnderftand the one onely & fingle eflence
in which we comprehend three Perfons or Hypoftafes.And iherforc
fo oft as we do indefinitely fpeake of the name of God, we mcane no
lefle ihe Sonne and the Holy ghoft than the Father . But when the
Sonne is ioyned to the Father , then commeth in a relation , and Co
wc make dilhndio betwene the Perfons. And becaufe the propreties
in the Perfons bring an order with them , fo as the beginnmg and o-
riginall is in the Father : fo oft as mention is made of the Father and
the Sonne,or the Holy ghoft togetl^r, the name of God is peculiarly
giuen to the Father. By this meane is retayned the vniry of y elfence,
and rcgarde is hadde to the order, which yet doth minifli nothing of
the godhead of the Sonne and of the Holy ghoft. And whereas wc
hauc already feenc that the Apoftlcs do aflBrmc , that the Sonne of
God is he , whom Mofes and the Prophetes do teftifie to be Teho-
uah the Lord , we rauft of neceflity alway come to the vnity of the
eflence . Wherefore it is a deteftable facnlege for vs to call the
Sonne a feuerallGod from the Father, becaufe the fimole name
of God , doth admittc no relation , and God in refped of himfclfc
can not be fayd to be this or that J Now, that the name of lehouah i.Cor.
the Lord indefinitely taken isapphed toChnft, appeareth by the »*-5>»
wordes of Paule , where he fayeth : Therefore 1 haue thry fe prayed
the Lord, becaufe that after he hadde rcceiuedthe aunfwcreof
Chrift , My grace is fufficicnt for the : he fayeth byandby , that the
power of Chrift may dwcllinme.lt iscertayne that the name Lord
is there fette for lehouah, and therefore to reftrayne it to the perfon
of the Mediatour were very fend and childifli, for fo much as it is an
abfolute fentece that compareth not the Father with the Sonne. And
we know that after the accuftomed maner of the Greekes , the Apo-
ftlcs do commonly fetteihe word Kyrios , Lord, in fteede of leho-
aah. And, not to fetch an example farrc of, Paule didde in no other
fcnfe pray to the Lord , than in the fame fenfe that Peter citeth the Ad. a,
place of Joel! ; whofoeuer callerh vppon the name of the Lord fhall • 6,
bcfaucd. But where this name is peculiarly giuen to the Sonne , we '°^''»»
{hall fee that there is an other reafon therof,whc we come to a place ^ '
fitte for it . Now it is enough to haue in minde , when Paule had ab- '
folutely prayed to God,hc byandby bringeth in the name of Chrift.
Euen fo is the whole God called by Chrift himfclfe the Spirite.
For tiiere is no caufc againft it , but that the whole elTence of God
may be fpirituall, wherin the Father, the Sonne & the Holy ghoft be
comprehended. Which is very playne by the Scripture. For euen as
there we heare God to be made a Spicite : fo we do heare the Holy
ghoft, for To much it is an Hypoftafis of the whole eflence, to be cal-
led both God,and proceeding from God.
21 But for as much as Sathan, to the end to roote out our Faith,
hath alway moued great contentions , partly concerning the diume
cffence of the Sonne, and of the holy Ghoft, and parily concerning
theyr diftindion of Perfones . And as in a maner in all ages he hath
ftirred vp wicked fpirites to trouble the true teachers in this behalfe:
fo at this day he trauaileth out of the old embres to kindle a new iire:
therefore here it is good to anf^ere the peruerfc foolifti enours of
fome . Hitherto it hath bin our purpofe , to leade as it were by the
hand thofe that are willing to learne, and not to ftriue hand to hand
with the obftinate and contentious . But now the trueth which we
hauc already peafeably (hewed, muft be reskued from the cauillationf
of the wicked. All be it my chiefe trauaile fhall yet be applied to this
end,that they which giue gentill and open eares to the word of God*
may haue whereupon ftedfaftly to reft their foote. In this point, if a-
ny where at all in the (ecrete myfteries of Scripture , we ought to di-
ipute foberly,and with great moderation, and to take great hede that
neither our thought nor our tongue proccedc any further than the
boundesof Gods word do extcnde. For how may the minde of man
by his capacity define the immeafurableefTenceofGod , which ne-
uer yet could certainly determine how great is y body of the Sunnc
which yet he daily feeth with his eyes?yea how may (he by her ownc
guiding attaine to difcufTc the fubftaunce of God,that can not reachc
to know her owne fubttaunce ? Wherefore let vs willingly giue ouer
Hila. 11. vnto God the knowledge of himfclfe. For he only, as Hilarie fayeth,
jpn^de J5 ^ conuenient witnefie to himfclfe, which is not knowc but by him-
felfe. Wc (hall giue it ouer vnto him,if we (hall both conceiuc him to
be fuch as he hath opened himfelfe vnto vs , and fliall not elfe wherfe
fearch to know of him,than by his owne word. There are to this end
wrytten fine homelies of Chryfoftome againft the Anomei. Yc t the
boldnefle of Sophifters could not be reftrayned by them from ba-
bling vnbridledly. For they haue bchaued themfelues in this behalfe
no whit more modeftly than they are wonted in all other. By the vnr
happic fucceffe of which vndifcretion,we ought to be warned to take
care th.it we bend our felues to trauale in thisqueftion rather with
tra<aable wiUmgncfle to learneyhan withftiaipnefle of witie,andnc-
uer
Trini
tace.
God the Creator. Lib.i. 47
ucr haue in our minde either to fearch for God any where clfe than
in his holy Worde , ortothinkeanythingof him, buthauinghif
Worde going before to guide vs , or to fpeakeany thinge but that
which is taken out of the fame Word : The diftindion that is in
the one Godhcade of the Father , the Sonne , and the holy Ghoit,
as it is very hard to know, fo doth it bring more bufineflc and com-
bcrancc to fome wittes than is expedient. Letce them remember that
the mindcs of men do enter into a mafe when they follow their ownc
curiofiry , and fo lette them fuffer themielues to be ruled with the
heauenly oracles, how focuer they can not attaine the height of the
myftery.
22 To makca regifter of the crrours, wherewith the purenefle of
Faith in this point of dodrine hath in times part bin ail'ailcd, were to
long and full of vnprofitabie tedioufnefle: and the moft parte of hc-
retickcs haue fo attempted to ouerwhelme the glory of God with
grofle doting errours,that they haue thought it enough for them to
(hake and trouble the vnskilfull. And from a few men haue fprong vp
many fedes , whereof fome do teare in funder the elTence of God,
fome do confound the diftindion that is betwene the Perfbns. But if
we hold faft that which is already fufficietly fhewed by the Scripture,
that the eflence of the one God which belongeth to the Father, the
Sonne,and the Holy ghoft,is finpje and vndiuided . Ag3ine,tbat the
Father by a certaine proprety difFereth from the Sonne, & the Sonne
from the Holy ghoftiwe flial ftop vp the gate not only againft Arrius
and SabeUius, but alfo the other old authors of errours. But becaufc
in our time there be rifen vp certaine phrenetike men, as Scruetto 8l
other hkc,which haue cncombred all things with new deceires : i t is
good in few wordes to difcufle their falfehoodes . The name of the
Trinity was fo hatefuljyca fo detefbblc to Seructto,th.it he (3yd5that
all the Trinitaries,as he called them,were vtterly godlefife. I omit the
foohfh words that he had deuifed to raile withall.But of his opinions
this was the fumme . That God is made Tripartite , when it is fayd»
that there abide three Perfons in his eflence , and that this Trinity is
but a thing imagined, becaufe it difagreeth with the vnity of God. In
the meane time the Perfons he would haue to be certaine outward
conceptions of Forme, which are not truely fubfiftiOg in the eflence
of God, but do reprefent God vnto vs in this or that faftiion. And at
the beginning that there was in God nqthing diftind bccaufe ones
the Word and the Spirite were all onc;but fins that Chriit arofe God
out of God, the holy Ghoft fprong alfo an other God out of hmi.
Aynd though fomume he colour his follies with allegories, as whe he
Cap.13. of the knowledge of
fayth , ihat the ctcrnall Word of God was the Spiritc of Chrift with
GodsSt the bright (hinuig of his forme. Againe, that the Holy ghoft
was the fhadow of the godhead , yet afterward he bringeth the god-
head of chcm both to nothing, affirming that after thcrateof djftri-
bution thercisborh in ihe Sonne and in the HolySpiritea parte of
GodjCue as the fame Spirite in vs, and alfo in wood and ftones is fub-
ftantially a portion of God . What he babbleth of the Perfon of the
Mediatour , we fhall herafter fee in place conuenient. But this mon-
ftrous forged deuife , that a Perfon is nothing elfe but a vifible forme
• » of the glory of God,necdeth no long confutation. For where as lohn
pronouceth, that the Word was God before the world was yet crear,
he makcth it much differing from a conception of forme. But if then
alfo, yea and from fartheft Eternity of time , that Word which was
God was with the Father,5chad his owne proper glory with the Fa-
ther,he could not be an outward or Hguranue fhining : but it necefla-
rily followeth that he was an HypolVafis that did inwardly abide in
Cod. And ahhough there be no mention made of the Spiriie , but in
the Hiftorie of the creation of the world.yet he is not there brought
Gc.i .z. in as a fhadow , but an effentiall power of God, when Mofes ftieweth
that the very vnfafhioned lumpe was fufteined in him . 'I herefore it
then appeared, that the eternall Spirice was alwayes in God, when he
prefcrued and fufteined the confufed matter of heauen and earth,vn-
till beauty and order were added vnto ir.Surely he could not yet be an
image or reprefentation of God as Scruetto dreameth . But in other
pointes he is compelled more openly to difdofe his wickednefle , in
laying that God by his eternall purpofe appointing to himfelfeavi-
fible Sonne, did by this meane (hew himfelfe vifible . For if that be
true there is no other godhead left vnto Chrift, but fo far as he is by
the eternall decree of God ordeined his Sonne.Moreoucr he (6 tranf-
formeth thofe imagined fhapes that he fticketh not to faine new ac-
cidents in God. But this of all other is moft abhominable,t!iat he c5-
fufcly mingleth as well the Sonne of God, as the Holy ghoft, with all
creatures.For he plaincly affirmcth, that there be partes and partiti-
ons in the Effcnce of God,of which eucry portio is God.And name-
ly he fayth, that the Spirites of the faithfuU are coeternall and con-
fuHftantiall with God .• albeit in an other place he ailigneth the fub-
ftamiall Deity,not onely to tlic foule of man, but alfo to other crea-
tures.
2^ Out of this finke came foorth an other like monfter. For ccr-
taine lewd me meaning to cfcapc the hatred & fhame of the wicked -
nelfc of ScruettOjhauc in dcedc confefled, chat there are there Per-
fons^
God the Creator. Lib.i. 48
fon% but adding a manner how:that the Father which trucly and pro-
prcly is the one onely God.in forming the Sonne & the Holy ghoft,
hath powred his godhead into them. Yea they forbcarc not this hor-
rible maner of fpeech, that the Father is by this marke diftingui(he4
from the Sonne and the Holy ghoft, that he >s the only elTentiacour
or maker of the effcncc. Firft they pretendeihis colour,thatChrifti$
echewhere called the Sonne of God : whereof they gather , that
there is none other properly God but the Father . But they markc
notjthat though the name of God be alio common to the Sonne,yct
by reafon of preeminence it isfometime giuen to the Father ondy,
becaufe he is the fountainc and originall of the Deity , and that for
this purpofe,to make the fingle vnity of the cffetice to be therby no-
ted . They take exception and fay : If he be truely the Sonne of God,
it is inconuenicnt to hauc him reckened the Sonne of a Pcrfon. I an-
fwere that both arc true : chat is , that he is the Sonne of God , be-
caufe he is the Word begotten of the Father before all worldes(^for
we come not yet to (peake of the Perfon of the McdiatourJ and yet
for explications fake we ought to haue regard of the Perfon.that the
nameof God flmply be not taken, but for the Father onely. For if •
vre meane none to be God but the Father , we plainely throw downe
the Sonne from the degree of God . Therefore fo oft as mention is
made of the godhead > we muli not admit a comparifon betwene the
Sonne and the Father, as though the name of God did belong one-
ly to the Father. For truely the God that appeared to Efay was the -^
true and onely God, and yet lohn affirmeth that the fame was £o}J,'*
Chrift. And he that by the mouth of Efay teftjfied , that he (hould 41.
be a ftumbhng ftone to the lewes, was the onely God : and yet Paule E<a.8.i4
pronounceth that the fame was Chrift . He that crieth out by Efay, Ro«n.^.
I hue , and to me all knees fliall bowe,is the onely God : and yet Paul 5^
cxpoundeth that the fame was Chrift . For this purpofe ferue thctc- ^ j.
ftimonies that the Apoftle recitcthiThou O God haft layd the foun- Ro. 14.
dations of heauen & earth. Againe,let all the angels of God worHiip *'•
him,which thinges belong to none, but to the onely God . And yet p5 '*'*
he fayth,ihat they are the propre titles of Chrift. And this cauillation ^^^
js nothinc^ worthithat that is giuen to Chrift,which is proper to God Pfai.yj,
becaufe Chrift is the fhining brightnefle of his glory . For becaufe 7-
in eche of chefe places is fette the name of lehouah, it folio weth,that
it is fo fayd in refped that he is God of himfclfe . For if he be leho-
uah , it can not be denied that he is the fame God that in an other ^^-^y**"
place crieth out by Efay : J , I am , and belide me there is no God. j^^^ j^,
Itisgoodaifoto confidcr that faying of Hiercmy ; The gods that n.
Cap.ij. Ofthe knowledge of
haue not made the heaucn & earth , let them pcrifh out ofthe earth
that is vnder the hcauen. Where as on the other iide we muft needcs
confcfl'e, that the Sonne of God is he , whofe godhead is oft proucd
in Efay by the creation of the world. And how can it be that the Cre-
ator, which giueth being to all thinges, fliali not be of himfelfe, but
borow his being of an other . For whofoeuer fayth that the Sonne
was clleniiate or made to be of his F3ther,denieth that he is of him-
felfe . But the Holy ghofl fayth the contrary , naming him Ichouah,
Now if we graunt that the whole cffence is in the Father onely, ei-
ther it muft be made partablcjor be taken from the Sonnc,and fo flial
the Sonne be fpoyled of his clfence, and be a God only in name and
title. The eflcnce of God, if we beleue thefe triheistbelonceth onely
to the Father,for as much as he is onely God,3nd is the elfencema-
ker ofthe Sonne . And fo fliall the godhead of the Sonne be an ab-
ftradfromtheeflenceof God, or aderiuation ofaparte outof the
whole . Now muft they needes graunt by their owne principle , that
the holy ghoft is the Spirite ofthe Father only . For if he be a deriua-
tion from the firft eflcnce,whicli is only proper to the Father^of right
he can not be accompted the Spirite ofthe Sonne: which is confuted
by the teftimony of Paul, where he maketh the Spirite common to
Chrift and the Father . Moreouer if the Perfon ofthe Father be wi-
ped out ofthe Trinity ,wherin ftiall he dift'er from the Sonne and the
Holy ghoftjbutin this,that he only is God?They cofefTc Chrift to be
God , and yet they fay he differech from the Father. Againe , there
muft be fome marke of difference to make that the Father be not the
Sonne. They which fay that marke of difference to be in the effence,
do manifefily bring the true godhead of Chrift to nothing,which can
not be without eilence , yea and that the whole effence. The Father
differeth not from the Sonne , vnleffe he haue fomething proper to
himfelfe that is not common to the Sonne. What now will they finde
wherein to make him differentPIf the difference be in the effence, let
them anfwere if he haue not communicated the fame to the Sonne.
But that could not be in parte , for to fay that he made halfe a God
were wicked. Befide that by this mcane they do fowiy teare in fiinder
the eftence of God.It remayneth therefore that the effence is whole,
and perfcdly common to the Father and the Sonne . And if that be
truejthen as touching the eftence there is no difference ofthe one of
them from the other. If they Cay that the Father in giuing his effence,
remayneth neuerdieleffe the only God, with whom the effence abi-
df th : then Chrift fhalbe a figuratiue God , and a God onely in fhew
and in name but not indecdc : becaufc nothing is more propre to
God
God the Creator. Lib.i . 4^
God tha to bcj3ccording to this fayingrHe that is,hath fent mc vmo Exod.s
you. M*
24 It is eafie by many places to proue that it is falfe which they
hold , that Co ok as there is in Scripture mention mnde abfolutely of
God , none is ment thereby but the Father. And in thofc places that
they themfelucs do allege,they fowly bewray their owne want of co*
(ideration, becaufe there is alfo fcttethe name ofthe Sonne. Wherc-
. by appearethjthat the name of God is there relatiucly takcjand ther-
fore reftrnmcd to the Pcrfon ofthe Father. And their obiedio where
they fayjlf the Father were not only the true God, he fhould himfelf
be his ownc Father,is anfwered with one word.It is not inconuenient
for degree and orders fake , that he be peculiarly called God which
hath notonely of himfelfc begotten his wifdom, but alfo is the God
ofthe Mediatour, as in place fitte for it , I will more largely declare.
For fith Chtift was openly fliewcd in the ftefh, he is called the Sonne
of God , not onely in refpeA that he was the eternall Word before
. all worldes begotten of the Father : but alfo becaufe he tooke vppon
him the Pcrfon and office of the Mediatour to ioyne vs vnto God.
And becaufe they do fo boldly exclude the Sonne from the honor of
God, I would fay ne know whether the Sonne when he pronoun- j,
ceth, that none is good but God, do take goodneflc from himfelfe ? ,-^
I do not (peake of his humaine nature > leaft perhappes they fliould
' take exception, and fayj that whatfoeuer goodnefle was in ir, it came
of free gift . I aske whether the eternall Word of God be good or
no ? If they fay nay, then we hold their vngodhneffe fufficienrly co-
uinced : in faying yea,they confound themfelues.But where as at the
fjrft fight , Chrift feemeth to put from himfelfe the name of Good,
that doth the more confirme our meaning . For fith it is the fingular
title of Gcxd alone , forafmuch as he was after the common maner
falutedby the name of Good, in refufing falfe honor , he did admo-
ni(h them , that the goodnefle wherein he excelled , was the good-
nelfe that God hath , I aske alfo , where Paule affirmeth that onely Tfm.n.
God is immortall,, wife ,and true, whether by thefe wordes Chnft i7«
be brought into the number of men mortall, foohfh, and falfe ? Shall ,
not he then be immortall , that from the beginning was life to giue
immortality-to angels ? Shall not he be wife that is the eternall wjfe-
dom of God } Shall not the trueth it felfe be ti uc?I aske funhermore, pj^jj ^^
whether they thinke that Chnft ought to be worfhipped or no? For lo.
he claimeth this vnto himfelfe , to haue all knees bowe before him:
it followeth that he is the God which did in the law forbid any or her
CO be woifhipped but himfelfe . If they will haue that meant of tlie
G
Cap. I ;. Of the knowledge of
Efa, 44. Father only which is fpoken in Efay : I am, and none but I:this tcfli-
tf. monic Iturne againit themfclues , for as much as we fee, that what-
foeuer pertaynechro God is giuen to Chrift. And their cauillation
hach no place , that Chrilt was exalted in the flefli , wherein he had
bin abafed, and that inrefped of the flefli, all authority is giuen
him in hcauen and in earth : bccaufe although the maieftic of king
and ludgecxtende to the whole Perfon of the Mediatour, yet if
he Haddcnot bin God openly fliewed in flefli, he could not hauc
bin auaunccd to fuchheigth, but that God fhould haue difagreed
Ph. 2.7. ^^'^'^ himfelfe . But this controuerfie Paule doth well take away , tea-
ching that he wasegall with God before that he diddeabafe him-
felfe vnder the fliape of a fcruaunt . Nowe howe couldc this equali-
tie haue ftande together , vnlcffe he hadde bin the fame God whofc
name is lah and lehouah : that rydeth vppon the Cherubin , that is
kingc of all the earth and Lord of the worldes ? Nowe howefoeuct
they babble againlt it , it canne not be taken from Chrift which E-
Efa. aj. faie faycth in an other place : He, he , is our God, for him wc
^» haue wayted , whereas in thefe wordes he defcribeth the comming
of God the redeemer , not onely that fhoulde bring home the peo-
ple from the exile of Babylon, but alfo fully in all poyntes rcftore the
Church . And with theyr other cauillation they nothinge prcuayle,
in faying , that Chrift was God in his Father . For though wc con-
fcffe that in refpcd of order and degree the beginning of the god-
heade is in the Father , yet we fay that it is a deteftable inuention to
fay that the effence is onely propre to the Father , as though he
were the onely Godmaker of the Sonne. For by thismeanes ey-
ther he rtioulde haue moe elTenee than one , or eife they call
Chrift God onely in tiile and imagination . If they grauiit that
Chrift is God, but next after the Father, then fliall the effence
be in him begotten and fafliioned , which in the Father is vnbegot-
ten and vnfalhioned. I knowe that many quickc nofed men do
laugh at this that we gather the diftindion of Perfons out of the
wordes of Mofcs , where he bringeth in God fpeaking thus : Lettc
Geo I ^^ n^dkc manne after our image. But yet the godly readers do
jtf. fee how vaynely andfondely Mofes (hould bring in^this as atalke
of diuerfe together, if there were not in God moe Perfons than
one . Nowe certayne is it , that they whom the Father fpake vnto,
werevncreate : but nothing is vncreatc but God himfelfe yea the
one onely God . Nowe therefore vnleflc they graunt that the po-
wer of creating was common , and the authoritie of commaunding
common, to the Father, the Sonne, and the Holyghoft : itfhall
followc
God the Creator. Lib.i. 50
followe that God didde not inwardly thus fpeake to himfelfe , but
dircded his fpceche toother foreyne worke mennc. Finally one
place fliall eafily aunfwere two of theyr obledions . For where as
Chrift himfelfe pronouncech that God is a Spiritc, this were notio!n.4,
conuenicnt to be reftraynedto the Father onely, asifihe Worde 24.
himlclfe w«renotof Spintuall nature. If thenthenamcof Spirite
doth as well agree with the Sonne as with the Father , I ga-
ther that the Sonne is alfo comprehended vnder the indefinyte
name of God. But he addeth byandby after that, none are allo-
wed for good worfhippcrs of the Father, but they that wor(hippe
him in Spirite andtrueih, whereupon followeth another ihingCa
becaufe Chrift doth vnder a heade execute the office of a teacher,
he doth giuc the name of God to the Father , not to the cnienc
to deftroye his ownegodheade , but by degrees to lift vs vppe vn-
to it.
25 But in this rhcy are deceiued,that they dreame of cerrayne vn-
diuided lingular thingcs whereof cch haue a parte of the eflencc. But
by the Scriptures we teach , that there is but one effeniially God^and
therefore that the eflencc as well of the Sonne as of the Holy ghoft
is vnbegotten . But for fo much as the Father is in order firft , and
hath of himfelfe begotten his wifdom , therefore rightfully as is a-
boue fayd , he is counted the originall and fountayne of all the god-
head. So God indefinitely fpoken , is vnbegotten, and the Father al-
fo in refpcd of Perfon is vnbegotten. And foolifhly they ihinke that
they gather, that by our meaning is made a quatemity , becaufe falfe-*
ly and cauilloufly they afcnbe vnto vs a deuifc of their owne brayne,
as though we did fayne that by deriuation there come three Pcrfcni
out of one eflencc: whereas it is euident by our wj ytinges that we da
not draw the Perfbns out of the eflence , but although they be abi-
ding in the eflencc we make a diftindio betwenc them. If the Pcrfons
were feuered from the eflence, then paraduenture theyr reafon were
like to be true . But by that meane it fliould be a Trinity of goddes
and not of Perfons, which one God conteyneth in him. So is their
fonde queftion aunfwered , whether the eflence do mete to make vp
the Trinity as though we did imagine that there defcende three eods
out of it. And this exception groweth of like foolilhncfi"e where
they fay , that then the Trinity fliould be without God , For though
it mete not ro make vppe the diftindion as a parte or a member , ycc
neither are the Perfons without it nor out of ic . Becaufe the Father
if he were not God could nor be the Father, and the Sonne is
none otherwifc the Sonne but becaufs he js God. We fay therefore,
G ij.
Cap. 13. Or tnc knowledge or
that the godhead is abfolutcly oF it felfe . Whereby we graunt that
the Sonne in Co much as he is God,is of himfelfe without refp'tde of
his Perlbn, bu i in fomuch as he is the Sonne, wc fay that he is of the
Father. So his efl'ence is without beginning, but the beginning of his
Perfonis God himfelfe. And the true teaching wryters that in old
time haue fpoken of the Trinity , haue onely apphed this name to
the Perfons , for fomuch as it were not onley an abfurde errour but
alfo a groife vngodhnelTe to comprehend the eflfence in the diftin-
^ion . For they that will haue thefe three to mete , the eflence , the
Sonne and the Holy ghoft , it is playne that they do dettroy the ef-^
fence of the Sonne and the Holy ghoft, for elfe the partes ioyned to-
gether would fall in funder , which is a fault in cuery diftindion. Fi-
nally if the Father and the Sonne were Synonimes or feuerall nameif
fignifying one thing, fothe Father (hould be the Godmaker and
nothing Ihould remaync in the Sonne but a fhadowe , and the Tr i-
nityfhould be nothing elfe , but the ioyningof oneGod with two
creatures.
26 Whereas they obied , that it Chrift be properly God , he is
not rightfully called the Sonne , to that we haue already anfwered,
that becaufe in fuch places there is a comparifon made of the one
Pcrfon to the other, the name of God is not there indefinitely taken,
butreftrayned to the Father onely, info much as he is the begin-
ning of the Godheade , not in making of efTence as the madde men
do fondly imagine , but in refpeiS of order. In this meaning is con-
ftrued chat faying of Chrift to the Father:this is the eternall life, that
men belcue in thee y one true God , & lefus Chrift whom thou haft
fent , For fpeakingin the Perfon of the Mediatour , he kccpeth the
degree that is meane betwene God and men: and yet is not his maie-
fty thereby dimini(hed . For though he abaced himfelfe , yet he left
not with the Father his glory that was hidden before the world . So
the Apoftle in the fecond Chapter to the Hebrues , though he con-
fcflcth that Chrift forafhortetime was abaced beneth the Angels,
yet he ftickeih not to affirme withall,that he is the fame eternal God
that founded the earth. We muft therefore hold, that fo oft as Chrift
in the Perfon of the Mediatour Ipcaketh to the Father , vnder this
name of God is comprehended the godhead which is his alfo.Sowhe
lohn.itf ^^^ ^^y^^ rothe Apoftles : it is profitable that I go vp to the Father,
y, * becaufe the Father is greater. He giueth not vnto himfelfe onely the
fecond degree of godhead to be as touching his eternall cfTcnce in-
feriour to the Father, but becaufe hauing obtayned the heauely glo-
ry^he gathercih together the faithfuU to the partaking of it. He fet-
teth
God the Creator. Lib.i. 51
tcth his Father in the hier degree , infomuch as the glorious perie- .
dion of brightnefTe thatappearethinheauenjdificieth fro tha: mea-
fure of glory that was fcene in him being clothed with fle/li . After
like maner in an other piacejPaul faythtthat Chrift ihali yeld vp the ^Cor.
kingdom to God and his Father, that God may be all m all. 1 liere is ^ ^'^"^
nothing more abfurd than to take away cternall continuance from
the godhead of Chrift. If hefhall neucrceaffe to be the Sonne of
God , but (hall alway remayne the fame that he was from the begin-
ning,it foiloweth that vnder the name of the Father is compreheded
the one eflence that is common to them both. And furely therefore
did Chrift defcende vnto vs , that hfting vs vppe vnto his Father, he
might alfo lift vs vp vnto himfelfc, inafmuch as he is all one with his
Father . It is therefore neither lawtull nor right Co exclufiuely to re-
ftraine the name of God to the Fathe.r,as to take it from the Sonne.
For, lohn doth for this caufe affirme that he is true God, that no loh.i.i
man (hould thinke that he rcfteth in a fecond degree of godhead be-
neth his Father . And I maruell what thefe framers of new Gods do
meane,that v/hile they confeire Chrift to be true God, yet they forth
with exclude him from the godhead of his Father. As though there
could any be a true God but he that is the one God,or as though the
godhead powred from one to an otherjbe not a certaine new forged
imagination.
17 Whereas they heape vp many places out of Ireneus,where he
affirmeth that the Father of Chrift is the onely and cternall God of
Ifraehthat is either done of a fhamefuU ignorauncc, or of an extreme
wickedneffe . For they ought to haue confidcred, that then the holy
man hadde to do in difputation with thofe frentike men that dcnycd
that the Father of Chrift was the fame God that in old time fpake
by Mofes and the Prophetes , but that he was I wote not wh at ima-
gined thing brought out of the corruption of the world. Therefore
he altogether trauaileth in this point , to make it playne that there
is no other God preached of in the Scripture but the Father of
Chrift, and that it isamifleto deuife any other, and therefore it is
no maruell if he fo oft conclude that there was no other God of If-
rael , but he that was fpoken of by Chrift and the Apoftlcs , And
in like manner now , whereas we are to ftand againft an other forte
of errour , we may truely fay that the God which in old time appea-
red to the Fathers, was none other but Chrift. But if any mannc
obied that it was the Father , our aunfwere is in redinefTc , that
when we ftriuc to defende the Godhead of the Sonne , we exclude
not the Father. If the readers take heede to this purpofe of Ire* \
G iij.
Cap.i3. Of the knowledge of
neub,all that contcnrion fliall cea((c. And alfo by the fixt Chapter pf
the third booke,this whole ftrife is ended,where the good man ftan-
dcth all vpon this point, to prouethat he which is in Scripture abfo-
lutcly and indefini tely called God : is verely the one oncly God , and
thatChriftis abfolutely called God. Let vs remember that this was
the princjpall point whereupon ftodc all his difputation, as by the
whole procefle thereof doth appeare:and fpecially the 45,Chapter of
the fecond booke, that he is not called the Father by darkc fimilitude
Lib. ?. or parable , which is not very God in deede . Moreouer in an other
^^P-9- place he fayth, that as well the Sonne as the Father were ioyntly cal-
led God by the Prophetcs and Apoftles , Afterward he dcfineth how
Chrift which is Lord of all, and king, and God> and Judge, receiued
i^'fdV* P*^^^'^ f*'°'^ ^'"^ which is the God of all , that is to fay in rcfped of
Cap 16. h»i rubiedion,becaufe he was humbled cuen to y death of the crofie.
eiofd.ii. And a little after he affirmeth , that the Sonne is the maker of hea-
uen and earth, which gaue the law by the hande of Mofes and ap-
peared to the Fathers . Now if any man do prate that with Ireneus
oncly the Father is the God of Ifi-ael , I will rurne againe vppon him
that which the fame wryrerplayncly teachcth, thatChnft is all one
and t!ie fameras alfo he applicth vnto him the Prophecie of Hr.bacuc,
Ibi. ca. God {hall come out of the South . To the fame purpofe fcrueth that
18.&23 which is read in the ninth Chapter of the fourth booke. Chrifl him-
felfe th^^refore with the Father is the God of the liuing . And in the
twclfc Chapter of the fame booke he expoundeth that Abraham bc-
leued God,becaufc Chrifl is the maker of heauen and eartli and the
onely God.
28 And with no more tructh do they bring in Tertulliane for
theyr defender . For though he be rough fometime and crabbed in
his manner of fpeech , yet doth he plainely teach the fumme of that
dodrine that we dcfende . That is to fay, where as he is the one
God, yet by difpofition and order he ishisWorde : that there is
but one God in vnity of fubftancc, and yet that the fame vnity by
miftery of orderly dillribution is difpofed into Trinity , thaftherc
are three , not in ftate , but in degree , not in fubttance , but in
forme : not in power, but in order. He fayeth that he dcfendeth
the Sonne to be a feconde next to the Father , but he meaneth him
to be none other than the Father, but by way of diftindion. In
fome places he fayeth that the Sonne is vifiblc . But when he hath
rcafoned on both partes he dcfineth that he is muifible in fo much as
he IS the Worde. Finally where he affirmeth that the Father is detcr-
inined in his ownc perfon,hc proucth himfelfe farrc from that crrour
which
God the Creator. Lib. i . 52
which wc confute . And though he doth acknowledge none other
God but the Father, yet in the next peece of his wry ting expounding
himfclfe 5 he fayth , that he fpeakeih not exclufiuely in refped of the
Sonne , bccaufe he denieth that y Sonne is any other God bclide the
Father , and that therefore their fole gouernement is not broken by
diftindion of Perfoa And by the perpetuall courfe of his purpofe it
is eafie to gather the meaning of his words. For he difputeth againft
PraxeaSjthat though God be diftinguilhed into three perfonSjyet arc
there not made many gods nor the vnicy torne in funder. And becaufe
by the imagination of Praxeas Chrift could not be God,but he muft
alfo be the Father , therefore hefomuch laboureth about the diftm-
dion.Wheras he calleth y Word & the Spirited porti5 of the whole
although it be a hard kinde of fpeech, yet is it excufableibecaufe it is
not referred to the fubftaunce,but only Iheweth the difpofition & or-
der that belongeth only to the Perfons, as Tertulliane himftife wir-
nefTeth. And herof hangeih that. How many Perfons thinktft thou
there are , O moft frowarde Praxeas , but euen (b many as there be
names ? And fo a little after that,they may bcleue the Father and the
Sonne cch in their names and perfons. Hereby 1 ihinke may be fu An-
ciently cofuted their impudency that feeke to begyle the fimple with
colour of Tertullians authority.
29 And furely whofoeuer (hall diligetly compare together y wry-
tinges of the old authors, fhall finde no other thing m Ireneus , than
that which hath bm taught by other that came after. luftine is one
of the auncicnteft , and he in all things doth agree with vs . Yet lettc
them obied that he as the reft do , calleth the Father of Chrift the
only God.The fame thing doth Hilary teachjyea and fpeaketh more
hardly,that the eternity is in the Faiher.But doth he that to take away
the eflence of Godfrom the Sonne ? And yet is he altogether in de-
fenfe pf the fame Faith that we foUowe. Yet are they not aftiamed to
picke out certaine mangled fentences whereby they would perfwadc
that Hilary is a Patrone of their errour.Wher they bring in Ignatius:
if they will haue that to be of any authority, let them prouc that the
Apoftles made a law for lent & fuch like corruptions of religion.No-
thingis more vnfauery than thofefonde trifles that are pubufbed vn-
dcr the name of Ignatius. Wherfore their impudence is fo much IcfTc
tolerable that difguile themfclues with fuch vifers to deceiue. More-
ouer the content of the auncicnt Fathers is plainely perceiuedby
this, that at the councell of Nice , Arrius neuer durft allege for him-
felfe the authority of any one allowed writer.And none of the Grekj
or Latins doth cxcufe himfclfe and fay, that he diffenteth from them
G iitj.
Cap. 1 4. Of the knowledge of
that were before. It ncedeth not to be fpoken how Auguftine,whoni
thefe lofeils do moft hate, hath diHgentiy fearched the wrytinges of
them all, and how reuercntly he did embrace them . Truely euen in
matters of leaft weight he vfeclito fhew what compelleth him to dif-
fcnt from them. And in this matter , if he haue read any thingdout-
fiill or daikem other,he hydeth it not.But the doftrinc that thefe me
ftriue againftjhe takethit as confcfTcd, that from the fartheft time of
antiquity it hath bin without cotrouerfie receiued. And by one word
ii appeareth that he was not ignorant what other had taught before
him, where h^e fayeth that in the Father is vnity, in the (iril booke of
Chriftian do<5trine,will they fay that he then forgate himfelfe? But in
an other place he purgethhimfelfe from fuch reproch, where he cal-
lech the Father the beginning of the whole godhead,becaufc he is of
none : confidering in dede wifely that the name of God is Ipccially a-
fcribed to the Father,becaufe if the beginning fliould not be reckencd
at him , the fingle vnity of God can not be conceiued. By this I truft
the godly reader will perceiue that all the cauillations are confuted
wherwith Satan hath hitherto attepted to peruert or darken ihe pure
trueth of dodrine.Finally I truft that the whole furnme of dodrine in
this point is fully decljred,if the readers will temper them of curioii-
ty,and not more gredcly than mete is feke for comberfome & entan-
gled difputations.For 1 take not in hand to pleafe thetnjthat do delitc
in an yntemperate defJre o{ fpeculation . Truely [ haue omitted no-
thing of futtle purpofe that I thought to make againft me. But while
1 ftudy to edifie the church, I thought it belt, to leaue many thinges
vntouched which both fmally profited , and would greue the readers
with fuperfluous tedioufneffe.For to what purpofe were it to difpute,
whether the father do alway beget? Forafmuch as it is folly to fayne
a continuall adof begeiting,fiih it is euident that from eternity there
haue bin three Perfons in God. •^' '^^f^^^
The xiiij. Chapter,
That the Scripture euen in the creation of the world and of all things:
doth by cerfoyne m/trkes put difference bet vvene the true
Cod , andfajned Gods.
ALthough Efay doth worthily reproche the worfhippers of
falfe Goddes wi rh floutbfollneire , for that they haue not
learned by the very foundations of the earth , and roundc
compafTe of the hcauens , which is the true God : yet
fuch is the dullnefle and groffene/Te of our witte , that leaft the
faythfull Ihouldcfall away to the inueiitionsofthe Gentiles, it was
neceflary
God the Creator. Lib. i . 53
Bcceflfary to haue God more exprefly painted out vnto them . For
whereas the faying that God is the minde of the worlde , which
is compted the moft tolerable defcripnon that is founde among
the Philofophers , is butvaine, it behoucth vs more familiarly to
know lum>lealt we alway wauer in doutefuInefle.Therfore it was his
pleafure to haue an hiftory of the creacion remainmg , wherupon the
Faith of the Church might rette,and feke for no other God but him,
whom Mofes hath declared to be the maker and bilder of the world.
There is firrt fet forth the timCjthat by continuall procedmg of yeres
the faithful) might come to the firft original of mankindc , and of all
thinges . Which knowledge is very necefTary , not onely to confute
thofe monftf uous fables that fometime were fpred in Egypte & other
partes of the worlde, but alfo , that the beginning of the worlde ones
being knowen, the eternitie ofGod may more clerely fhine forth and
rauifh vs in admiracio of it.Neither ought we to be any thing moued
with that vngodly mocke , that it is marucli why it came no foner in
the minde of God to make the heaue and the earth, & why he fitting
idle did fufter Co immeafurable a fpace to pafTe away,{ith he moughc
haue made it many thoufande ages before: wheras the whole con-
tinuaunce of the worlde that now draweth to an end,is not yet come
to lixe thoufande yeres . For why God fo long difFerred it , is nether
lawful nor expedient for vs to enquire. Becaafe if mans minde will tra-
uajle to atteine thereunto , it (hall faile a hundred times by the way,
neither were it profitable for vs to know that thing which God him-
felfe to prouc the modellie of our Faith,hath of purpofe willed to be
hidden. And well did that godly olde man fpeake,which when a wan-
ton fellow did in fcorne demaunde of him , what God had done be-
fore the creatio of the woild,anfwercd that he builded hel for curious
fooIes.Let this graue & feuere warning reprefl'e the wantonnefle that
tickleth many yea and driucth them to cuill and hurtefuU fpeculatios.
Finally let vs remember that the fame inuilible God whocs wifdom
power and iufticeis incomprehenfible , doth fet before vs the hiftoric
of Mofes as a loking glafle, whetin his liuely imagine appeareth. For
as the eyes that either are growen dimme with age,or dulled with any
difcafe , do not difcerne any thing plainly vnlefle they be holpen with
fpedacles : fo,fuch is our weakenefre,that vnlefTe the Scripture dired:
vs in feking of God,we do forthwith runne out into vanitie. And they
that follow their ownc wantonnefle , becaufe they be now warned in
vaine, (hall all to late fele vnth horrible dellrudion , how much it had
bin better for them reueretly to -receiue the fecrete counfcls of God,
than to vomitc outblafphemies,to oblcure the heauen with all. And
Cap. 1 4. Of the knowledge of
Lib.de rightly doth Auguftine complaine that wrong is done to God when
K^"«5?* further caufe of thingcs is fought for , than his oncly will . The fame
Dc ciJ "^^" '^ ^" other place doth wifely warne vs , that it is no lefle euell to
deilib.*n?ouequeftionofimmcafurable fpaces of times than of places. For
40. how brode foeuer the circuit of the heaucn isjyet is there fome mea-
fure of it.Now if one (hould quarel with God for that the emptineffc
wherin nothing is conteincd , is a hundred times more , (hall not all
the godly abhore fuch watonneflePlnto like madneflc runne they that
bufic them felues about Gods fitting {lill,becaufc at their appointmet
he made not the worlde innumerable ages foner . To fatisfie tlieir
ownc gredinefleof minde, they couetto paffe without the compalTc
of the worldcas though in fo large a circuite of heauen & earth,they
coulde not finde thinges enough that with their meftimable bright-
neflfe may ouerwhelme all our fenfes : as though in (ix thoufand yeres
God hath not (hewed examples in continuall confideracion , wherof
our mindes may be cxercifed . Let vs therfore willingly abide endo-
fed within thofe boundes whcrwith it pleafcd God to enuiron vs, and
as it were to pennc vp our mindes that they rtiould not ftray abrode
with liberty of wandring.
2 For like reafon is it that Mofes declareth,that the woikc of God
was not ended in a moment but in fix dayes. For by this circumftancc
wc are withdrawen from forged inuecions to the one oncly God that
diuided his worke into fix dayes^that it fhould not greuc vs to be oc-
cupied all the time of our life in confidering of it . For though our
eyes J what way foeuer we turne them , are compelled to looke vpon
the workes of God, yet fee wc how fickle our hede is, and if any god-
ly thoughtes do touch vs J how fone they pafic away . Here againe
mas realbn murmureth as though fuch procedinges were difagreing
from the power of God,vntill fuch time as being made fubied to the
obedience of Faith , fhelearne to kepe thatrefte wherunto the hal-
lowing of the feuen day calleth vs. But in the very order of thinges, is
diligently to be confidcred the Fatherly loue of God towardc man-
kinde , in this : that he did not create Adam vntill he had ftored the
world with all plenty of good thinges.For if hehad placed him in the
earth while it was yet barren and emptie, if he had geuen him life be-
fore that there was any light, heftiouldehaue fcmed not fowtllto
^rouide for his commoditie.But now where he firft difpofcd the mo-
tions of the Sunne and the Planets for the vfc of man , and furnifhed
the earth, the waters and the aire with liuing creatures , and brought
forth aboundance of fruites to fuffice for foode,taking vpon him the
care of a diligent & prouidenthoufeholdcr^he (hewed his maruellous
bountic
God the Creator. Lib.i, 54
boontietovvardevs. It'amandomore hedefully weye with himfclfc
thofe thingcs that I do but fliorily touch , it fhall appcare that Mofes
was the furewitnefTe&publifherof thcone God the creator. I omitt
here that which I haue already declared , that he fpeaketh not there
onelvof ihebarceflcnccof God, but alfo fettcth forth vnto vs his
ctcrnall Wifdom and Spirite , to tiie ende we fliould not dreamc that
God is any other , than fuch as he will be knowen by the image that
he hath there expreffedi
5 But before that 1 begin to fpcake more atlarge of the nature of
man,T muft fay fomeAvhat of Angels.Becaufc though Mofes applymg
himfelfe to the rudeneifc of the common people reciteth in his hi-
ftory of the crcacio no other workes of God but fuch as are feen with
our eyes , yet whcras afterwarde he bringeth in Angels for minifters
of God, we may eafily gather that he was the creator of them in
whoes feruice they employ their trauaile and offices. Though there-
fore Mofes fpeakeing after the capacity of the people doth not at the
very beginning rehearfe the Angels among the creatures of God : yet
that is no cauic to the contrary, but that we may plainly and exprefly
fpeake thofe thinges of thcm,vvhich in other places the Scripture c5-'
monly teacheth. Becaufe ifv/edc/ireto know Godby his wcrkes, fo
noble and cxcellente an example is not to be omitted. Befide that this
pointe of dodiine is very neceffary for the confuting of many errors.
The excellence ofthe nature of Angels hath Co dafellcd the mindes
of many , that they thought the Angels had wrong offred them , if
they fliould be made fubied to the authoritie of one GodjSc brought
as it were in obedience. And herevpon were they fained ro be Gods.
There role vp alfo one Manichcus with his fe(fts , which made them-
felues twooriginall beginninges of thinges, God,and the Deuell,and
to God he afligncd the beginning of good thingcs, and of thingcs of
cuill nature he determined the Deuill to be the aurhor.If our mindes
ftiould be entangled with this error , God fhould not kepe whole his
glory in the creacion ofthe world.For where as nothing is more pro-
per to God than eternitie and a being of himfelfe as I may fo tcrmc
it, thry which gcue that vnto the Deuill, do they not in a mancr geue
him the title of Godhead? Now where is the almighiincfle of God
become, if fuch authoritie be graunted to the deuill, that he may put
in cxecucion what he will though God fay nay and withftandc it ? As
for the onely fundation that the Manichees haue , that it is vnlawfull
to afcribe vnto God that is good,the creation of any thing that is euih
that nothing hurteth the true Faith, which admitteth not that there
is any thing naturally cuill in the whole vnnierfalitic of the wotlde.
Cap.i 4. Of the knowledge of
becaule neither the frowardncfle and malice both of man and the de-
ucli,nor the (innes that precede therof, are of nature , but of the cor-
ruption of nature . Neither was there any thing from the beginning*
whcrinGod hath not Ihewed an example both of his wifdomand
iuftice. Therfore to aunfwcre thefe peruerfe deuifes : it behoueth vs
to lift vp our mindcs hier than our eyes can atteine to fee. For which
caufc it is likely , that where in the Nicene crede God is called the
creator of all thingcs , thinges inuifible are exprclTcd. Yer wril we be
caref ull to kcpe the meafure that the rule of godlincflc appointcth,
leaft the readers with fearching to vnderftande further than is expe-
dient, fhould wander abroade, being ledde awaie from the fimphcitic
of Faith. And furely for as much as the Holy ghoft teacheth vs alwaie
for our profice , and fuch thingcs as are fmally auaylable to editic , he
doth either leaue wholly vnfpoken,or but lightlyjand as it were oucr-
runningly touch them : it ftiall be alfo our duetie to be content not to
know thofe thinges that do not profice vs.
4 That the Angels, for as much as they are the minifters of God
ordeined to execute his commaundementes, are alfo his creatines, it
ought to be certainly out of all queftion. To moue doute of the time
and order that they were created in , fhoulde it nor rather be a bufy
waywardneffe than dihgence ? Mofes declarcth that the earth was
madcjand the heauens were made,with all their armies, to what pur-
pofe tha is it,curioufly to fearch, what day the other more fecrcte ar-
mies of heauen befide the ftnrres and pianettes firft began to be? But,
becaufe I will not be long : let vs,as in the whole dodtrme of religion,
fo here alfo remembre that we ought to kepe one rule of modeftie &
fobrietie , that of obfcure thinges we neither fpeake, nor thinke , nor
yet defire to know any other thinges than that hath bin taught vs by
the wordeofGod: and an other point, that in reading of Scripture
we continually reft vpon the fearching and ftudying of fuch thinges as
pertaine to edification,and not geue our felues to curiofitie or ftudy of
thinges vnprofitable. And becaufe it was Gods pleafure to inftrud vs^
not in triflyng queftions, but in founde godlineffe , fe.ire of his name,
true confidence , and duties of holinefle : let vs reft vpon fuch know-
ledge. Wherfore, if we will be rightly wife, we muft leaue thofe vani-
ties that ydle men hauc taught without warrat of the v/orde of God,
concerning the nature,degrees,and multitude of Angels. I know that
fuch matters as this, are by many more gredily taken liolde of,and are
more pleafant vnto them tha fuch thingcs as lie in dayly vfe. But if it
grcuc vs not to be the fcholers of Chrift , let it not grcue vs to follow
that order pf learning that he hath appointed. So fliall it fo come to
pafTe,
Cjod the Creator. Lib.i* 55
pafle, that being contented with his fcholing , we (hall not oncly for-
beare but alfo abhorre fuperfluous fpeculations , from which he cal-
leth vs away. No man can dcny,that the fame Denyfe , what foeucr
man he was , hath difputed many thinges both fubtiUy and witty ly in
his Hierarchieof heauen : but if a man examine it more nccrely , he
fhal finde that for the moft parte it is but mere babbling.But the duti-
full purpofc of a diuinc is , not to dehtc eares with prating, but to fta-
bhfli confcicnces with teaching thinges true, certaincjand profitable.
If one fliould reade that booke , he would thinke that the man were
flipped downe from heauen , and did tell of thinges not that he had
learned by hcrcfayjbut that he had feen with his eies.But Paule which T.Cor,
was rauifhed aboue the ihirdc heaucnjhath vttered no fuch tbing,but ^ ^' *•
alfo proteftethjihat it is not lawful for man ro fpeake the fecretc:s that
he had feen. Therfore bidding farewell to that triflyng wifdon-),let vf
confider by the fimple dodrine of theScripturCjWbat the Lord would
haue vs know concerning his Angels.
5 It is comonly read in the Scripiure,that the Angels are heauen-
ly Spiritcs.whofe miniftraiion & feruiceGod vfeth for putting in exe-
cution of thole thinges that he hath decreed. For which reafon that
name is gcuen themjbecaufe God vfeth them as mcflangers^to flicwc
him felfe vnto men. And vpo like reafon arc deriued the other names
that they are called by. They are named armieSjbecaufe they do like
a garde enuiro their prince,and do adorne and fet forth the honoura-
ble fhew of his maicftie, and like fouldiours they are alway attending
vpon the enfigne of their capitaine , and are cuer fo prepared and in
readynefTe to do his commaundcmentes , that fo fone as he doth bus
becken to them,they prepare the felues to worke,or rather be at their
worke alredy.Such an image of the throne of God to fet out his roial-
lie, the other prophetes do defcribe, but principally Daniel where he Dan. 7,
faith,that when God fate him down in his throne of iudgement,thcre *°'
ftode by a thoufandethoufande, and ten thoufande companies often
ihoufandes of Angels. And bccaufe God doth by them maruailoufly
(hew forth and declare the might and ftrength of his hand , therfore
they are named ftrengths , bicaufe he cxercifeth & vfeth his authorite
in the worlde by them, therfore they are fometime called Principali- ^^^^^
tiesjfometime powers, fometime Dominions.Finally bccaufe in them g *l '
as it were fitteth the glory of God , for this caufe alfo they are called 21.
Thrones:though of this laft name I will not certainly fay , bccaufe an
other expofition doth either as well or better agree vfith it. But (fpea-
king nothing of that name) the Holy ghoft often vfeth thofe ether
ibrmernames to auaunccthe dignitie of the minifteric of Angels. For
Cap.i4- Of the knowledge of
it were not rcafon that thole inftrumcntes fhould be let paflc without
honor,by whom God doth fpecially iliew the prefence of his maierty.
Yea for that reafon they are many times called GodSjbecaufe in their
miniftery as in a looking glafle,they partly reprcfent vnto vs the god-
Gen iS, head. Although in deedc I miflike not this that the olde writers do
I. J 2. cxpoundjthai Chri(t was the Angel,wher the Scripture faith,that the
^ ' ^' angel of God appcred to AbrahamjIacobjMofeSjSc otheisyet often-
ludi. 6. tinges where mention is made of all the Angels in deede this name is
14. and geuen vnto them.And that ought to feme no mcruaile.Forif this ho-
>?:*-. nour be geuen to princes and gouernors,that in their office they ibnd
FU.8S. jj^ theftedeof Godthat is foueraigne king andiudge, much greater
caufe there is why it iliould be geuen to the Angels , in whom ihc
brigh tncs of the glory of God much more abundantly (hincth.
6 But the Scripture ftandeth moft vpon teaching vs that, which
might molt make to our comforte and confirmacion of Faith: that
is to wete, that the Angels are the diftributers and adminiftratours of
Pfa 9\ Goddesbountietowarde vs. And therefore the Scripture reciteth,
J,/ that they watch for our fafctic ; they take vpon them the defence of
Pfa. 3 .}. vSjthey direftc our wayeSjthey take care that no hurtful! thing betide
5- vnto VS. The fentenccs arc vniuerfall , which principally pertaine to
^^' **• thrift the head of the Church , and then to all the faithfuU. He hath
Gc. 24. g^uen his Angels charge of thee,to kcpe thee in all thy waves. They
7. iTiall beare thee vp in their handes , leaft thou chauncc to hitte thy
Ge 48. ffetg againft a ftone. Againe,The Angf 11 of the Lord flandeth roundc
J ; about them that fcare him , and he doth dehuer them, Whcrby God
1 9. and ihewcththat he apointethtohis Angels the defence of them, whom
2?.2C, he hath taken in hand to kepc.After this order the Angel of the Lord
IitJ.2.'. doth comfort Agar when Ihc fled away, andcommandethhcrto be
^.-^.i!. reconciled to her maiftrefle . God promifcth to Abraham his feruanc
Mdt^'4. ^" Angell to be the guide of his lourney. lacob in blelling of E-
I I. phraim and ManaiTes praicth , that the Angell of the Lorde by whcm
luk22. he himfclfehadbin deliuered from all euell, may make them pro-
^^' ^a fper . So the Angell was fctto defende the tentes of the people of
'^" ' Ifracll. And (o oft as it pleafed God to refkue Ifraell out of the handes
Luc.24 of their enemics,hc raifcd vp rcuegers by the minifterie of Angels. So
5- final'y(to the cnde I nedc not to reherfc many mo)the Angels mini-
Ad. I. f^^^^ jQ Chrift,and were ready affiftent to him in all neceffities.They
2 Kin'' brought tidinges to the women of his refurredion , and to the difci-
i^.jjf pies of his glorious commmg. And fo to fulfill their office of defen-
ding vs , they fight againft the deuill and all enemies , and do execute
the vcngeaunce of God vpon chem, that are bent againft vs . As we
readc
God the Creator. Lib.i. 5^
rcade that the Angellof God to dcliucrHicrufaiem from ficge,flcwc Erj.37.
in one night a hundred fowerfcore and fiue thoufande in the campc 3 ^*
of the king of Aflyria.
7 But whether to eucry of the faithful! be a feucrall Angell aflig-
ned for their dqfencf, I dare not certainely affirme. Surely when Da- Da 10.
nicU bringeth in the Angel of the PerfianSjand the Angel of the Gre- M- and
ciansjheftieweththat he mente,that there are to kingdomes and pro- ^^^j'^g^
uinces certaine Angels appointed as gouernours . And when Chrift iq,
faith that the Angels of children do alvvay beholde the face of the
Father,he feemeth to meancjthat there are certaine Angels to whom
the preferuation of them is geuen in charge . But I can not tell whe-
ther we ought thereby to gather , that euery one hath his Angell fet
ouer him.But this is to be holden for certaintie, that not one Angell
only hath care of euery one of vs,but that they all by one confent do
watche for our fafetie. For it is fpoken of all the Angels togithcr,that
the y more reioyce of one (inner couerted to repetance,than of nyntic Iuc.15
and nine iuft that haue ftande ftill in their righteoufneife . And it is 7-
faid of mo Angels than one,that they conucycd the foule of Lazarus j"*^**^*
into the bofomeofAbraha.And not without caufe did EliieusHiewc 2.Kino«
to his feruant fo many fiery chariots that were peculiarly appointed 1617.
for him. But one place there is that fccmcth more plaine than the reft Aa.i j.
to prouc this point.For whe Peter being brought out of prifon knoc- * 5*
kedat the doores of the houfe , where the brethren were alTcmblcd,
vvhen they coulde not imagine that it was he,they faid it was his An-
gel.It fhould feeme that this came in their mindc by the commo opi-
nion , that to euery of the faithful! are afligned their Angels for go-
uernours. Albeit yet here it may be anfwcred that it may wel be,nci-
withftanding any thing that there appearcth, that we may ihinke ic
was any one Angell , to whom God had gcuen charge of Ptter for
that time,and yet not to be his cotinuall kcepcnas the common peo-
ple do imagine that there are appointed to euery one two Angels 3 as
it were diuers ghoftes,a good Angell and a badde.But it is not worth
trauailc , curioufly to fearch for that which doth not much importe
vs to know. For if this do not content a man , that all degrees of the
armie of heauen do watch for his fifetie , I do not fee what he can be
the better, if he vndcrftandthat there is one Angell pecuhatly ap-
pointed to kepe him. And they which reftraine vnto one Angell the
care that God hath to euery one of vs, do great wrog to them felues,
and to all the mcmbres of the Church: as if that power to fuccour vs
hadbin vainely promifed vs, whcrwith being enuironed anddefen*
ded>we fhould fight the more boldly.
Cap. 1 4. Of tlie knowledge of
8 They that dare take vpon them to define ot the multitude and
degrees of Angels , let them looke well what fundation they haue. I
Da.ii> graunt Michael is called in Daniel, the Great prince, and with lude,
lud.i. jj^g Archangell. And Paule faith , it (hall be an Archangcll that lliall
i.Theff ^'^^^^ founde of trumpet call men to the ludgcmet.But who can ther-
4.16. by appoint the degrees of honours between Angels, or difcerne one
from an other by Ipeciallmarkcs, and appoint euery one his place
and ftanding ? For the two names that are m Scripture,Michaell, and
GabrithSc if you lift to adde the thirde out of the hifrorie of Thoi)ic,
may by their fignification feme to be geuen to the Angels, accordin"g
to the capacitie of our weakenefle, although I had rather,leaue that
expofioon at large. As for the numbre of them, wee hearc by Chnftes
Mac. 2 5 mouth of many Legions , by Daniell many companies of ten thou-
|j^' fandes, the feruant of Eliaieus faw many chariottes full : and this de-
,0, * ' clareth that they are a great multitude , that it is faid, they do campe
Pfa.34. rounde about them that feare God. As for fhape , it is certainejthat
'• Spintes haue none , and yet the Scripture for the capacitie of our wit
doth not in vaine vnder Cherubin and Seraphin paint vs our Angels
with winges , to the intent we fhould not dout that they will be euer
with incredible fwiftnefle, ready to fuccour vs , fo fone as neede fhall
require , as if the lightning fent from heauen fliould fiie vnto vs with
Tuch fwiftnefle as it is wonted . What foeuermore than this may be
fought of both thefe pointes, let vs beleue it to be of that fort of mi-
ftericSjwherof the full reuelation isdiffcrred to the laft day.Wherfore '
let vs remembre to take hede both of to much curiofitic in fearching
and to much boldneflc in fpeaking.
9 But this one thing which many troublefome do call in doubt,
is to be holde for certainrie,that Angels are miniftring fpirites,whofe
fcruice God vfeth for the defence of his , and by whom he botk di-
ftributeth his benefices among men,and alfo putteth his other workes
in execution. It was in the olde time the opinion of the Sadduces,that
by Angels is rpeant nothing, els,but either the motios that God doth
jnfpire in mcn,or the tokens that he (heweth of his power.But againft
this error crie out fo many teftimonies of Scripture, that it is meruailc
that fo grofle ignorance could be fuftred in that people . For to omit
thofe places that I haue before alleged , where are recited thoufandcs
and Legions of Angelsrwhere ioy is geuen vnto them: where it is faid
that they vpholde the Faithful! with their handes^Sf cary their foules
inrorcfterthac they fee the face of the Fatherland fuch hke : there arc
Ad 8. ^^^^^ places wherby is clerely proued, that they are in deede Spirites
53.' ' of a nature that hath fubft ancc . For where as Stephen and Paule do
God the Creator. Lib.i. 5 7
fay, that the law was gcuen by the handc of Angels , and Chrift faith. Gal. j.
that the eled after the refurredion flail be like vnto Ano;els:that the ' f •
day of iudgement is not knowen to the very Angels : that he iliall the ^^^ ^^J
come with his holy Angels: how foeuer they be writhed, yetmuft 24. 37.
they fo be vnderftanded.Likewif'e when Paule chargeth Timcthe be- j i. and
fore Chrift and his cholen Angels , to keepe his commaundemcntei, J '•
he meaneth not qualities or inlpirations without fubftance butvcry ^^ '^*
fpirites . And otherwife it ftandeth not togither that is written in i.Tim.5
the Epiftle.to the HebrueSjthat Chrift is become more excellent than ij.
Angels, that the world is not made fubicd to them : that Chrift toke ^cb.i,
vpon him not thtir nature, but the nature of man. If wemcane not j^ '
the bkfled fpirites, to whom may thefe comparifons agree? And the
author of chat Epiftle cxpoundeth him felfe where he placeth in the
kingdome of heauen the foules of the faithful! and the holy Angels
together. Alfo the fame that we haue already alleged,that the Angtls
of children do alway behold the hce of God, that they do reioycc at
our fafetie , that they marueil at the manifolde grace of God in the u u ^
Church, that they are fubicdto Chrift, the hedde. To the fnmc pur- ^j '
pofe ferueth this , that they fo oft appered to the holy Fathers in the
forme of me, that they talked with them,that they were lodged with
them. And Chrift him felfe for the principall preminence that he hath
in theperfon of the Mediator is called an Angel.This I thought good Mal.j,
to touch by the way,to furnifli the (implc with defence againft thofe ^•
foohlTi and rcafonlefle opinions,that many ages ago raifed by Sathan
do now and then fpring vp againe.
10 Nowe it refteth , that we fecke to mete with that fuperftition
which is commonly wont to crepe in,whcre it is faid: that Angels are
the minifters and dcliucrers of all good thinges vnto vs. For byandby
mans r«afon falleth to this point, tothinke that therfore ail honour
ought to be geuen them . So cometh it to pafle that thofe thinges
which belong only to God and Chrift, are conueied away to Angels.
By this mcane welee thatincertaine ages pafte , the glory of Chrift
hath bin many waies obfcured, whe Angels without warrant of Gods
worde were loden with immeafurable titles of honor. And of ail the
vices that we (peake againft, there is almoft none more auncient than
this. For it appereth , that Paule himfelfe had much to do with feme Co'ofT.
which fo auaunced Angels , that they in manerVould haue brought n*. /
Chrift vnder fubiedion. And therfore he doth fo carefully preife thi$
point in his Epiftle to the Colcftians , that Chrift is not only to be
preferred before all Angels , but that he is alfo the author of ail the
good chinges that they haue : to the ende we fhould not forfake him
H
Cap. 14. Of the knowledge of
and turne vnto them, which cannot fufficientlyhelpe themfclucs,
but are fainc to draw out of the fame founraine that ve do.Surely for*
afmuch as there ihmeth in them a cerwine brighmefl'e of the maieftjr
or Godj there is nothing whcrunro we are more eafily enclined, than
with a certame admiration to fail downe in worfhipping of them,and
to geuc vnto them all thingcs that are due only to God. Which thing
Icha in the Revelation confcllcth to haue chaunced to himfelfe, but
he addcth wuhall^that he itvciued this aunfvvere. See thou do it not.
For I am thy fellow feruant, Worlhip God.
II ■ But this daunger we fiiall well beware of,ifwc do confider why
God vfeth rather by them than by himfelfe without their feruice to
declare his povver,to prouide for the fafetie of the faiihfuli,and to co-
mmunicate the giftes of hishberaUtieamogthem. Surely he doth not
this of necelTitic,as though he coulde not be without rhernifor fo oft
as pleafeth him,he lettcth them alone, &bringeth his worke to paflc
widi an onely becke : fo farrc is it of,that they be any aide to him , to
cafe him of t!ie hardnefle therof. This therfore makethfor the com-
foric of our v/eakeneire,fo that we wai.w nothing that may auaile our
mi ndes, either in railing them vp in good hopejor confirming them in
alTiirance.This one thing ought to be enough and enough againefor
vs, that the Lord affirmeth that he is our protedour. But while we fe
our felues befieged with fo many daungcrSjfo many hurtefull thinges,
fo many kindes of enemies:it may be ( fuch is our weakenelTe & frail-
tie ) that we be fomecime hiled with trembling feare , or fall for de-
rpaircjvnlelle the Lord after the proporcion of our capacitic do make
vs to conceiue fiis prefence.By this meaiie he not only promifeth that
he Will haue care of vs , but alfo that'.he hath an innumerable garde to
whom he hath giuen in charge totrauaile forour fafctic, and that fo
long as we be compafled with the garrifon & fupporteof them,what-
focuer daunger betideth , we be without all reach of hurte. I graunc
we do amifie that aftev this fimple promife of the protedion of God
alone, we ilillookc about from wheceotherhelpcmay come vnto vs.
But for as much as it pleafeth the Lord of his infinite clemencie and
gentilneiTe to helpe this our fault, there isnorealbn v/hy we fliould
negled his fo great benefite . An example therof we haue in the fer-
uant of Ehzcus , which when he faw the hill befieged with the army
of the Syiians,and thnt there was no way open to efcape,was ftriken
downe with fcarc,a8 if his maillcr andlie were then vtterly deftroied.
2.Kings Then Elizcns praied God ro open his feruantes eieSjand byandby he
Inwc the hill fiuniilied with horfcs and fiery chariots, that is with a
muititude of Angels to kepe hmi and the prophet fafe. Encouraj^ed
with
0.;^.
God the Creator. Lib.i. 58
with this viGon he gathered vp his hartc agiine , and was able with a
dredelelfe minde to looke down vpo his enemieSjWith fight of whom
he was before in amanerdriuen out of his vvstte.
12 Whcrfore whatfoeucris faidoftheminillerieof Angflsjet vs *
applic it to this ende , that ouercomming all diftruftjour hope mi>y be
the more ftrongely ftabhfhed in God. Forthcfe fuccoursarc ha fore
prouided vs of God, that we Ihould not be made afrayde with multi-
tude of enemies, as though they coulde preunile ag.iinft his helpe, but
fhould flie vnto that faying of Elizeus , that there be mo on our ude
than be againft vs. How much then is it againft order of rcafon , that
we fhouldc be led away from God by Angels which are ordcincd for
this purpofe, to tcftifie that his helpe is more prefent among vs ? But
they doleade vs away in dede,if they do notftrcight leade vs as it were
by the hande to him, that we may haue eye vnto,call vpon,& pubiifh
him for our onely helper '.if we confidcrnot them to be as his handes
that moue themfelues to no worke but by his diredion: if they do not
holde vs faft in the one Mediarour Chrift,fo that we may hang who]-- ^ ^^
ly of him, leane all vpon him, be carled to him , and refte in him. For j j^' ""
that which is defcribcd in the vifion of Jacob oufjht to fticke and be
faftened in our mindes, how Angels defcendc dov. n to the earth vnto
men,and from men do go vp to heauenby a ladder,vvhervpon lladcth
the Lord of hoftcs. Wherby is meant,that by the only interccfllon of
Chrift It cometh to pafTe, that the minifteries of the Angch do come Gen. 14
vnto vs , as he him felfe affirmeth, faying : Hereafter ye Pna'U fee the 7«
heaucns open and the Angelles defcendingtothe Sonne of man loh.
i.li.Therforc the feruant of Abraham being comitted to the cuiiody
ofthe Angcll, dothnotthcrforecall vpon the Angdl to helpe him, '
but holpen with that commendation,he praieth to the Loi^^j^nd be«
fecheth him to fliew his mercy to Abraham . For as God doth not
therfore make them minifters of his power and goodnelfcjio the intct
to parte his glory with them : fo doth he not therfore promife vs his
helpe in their miniftrationjthat we flioulde diuide our confidence be-
twene him and them. Let vs therfore forfake that Platonicall philo- „, .
fophiCjto feekethe wayto God by Angels , and to honour them for epvno/
this purpofe that theymay make God more gentill vntovs; which nide&
fuperflitious and curious men haue from the beginning gone about, Crahlo.
and to this day do continue to bring into our religion.
i^ As for fuch thingesas the Scripture teacheth concernins: de*
uilleSjt'ney tend in a maner all to this ende,that we may be carcfull to
beware aforehandc of their awaitcs and preparations, nnd furnifii our
i'clucs with fuch weapons as are ihron^e and fuie enough to dnuc
H I).
Cap. 1 4. Of the knowledge of
away euen the ftrongeft enemies. For whereasSathanis called the
God and prince of the worlde , where as he is named the ftiong ar-
med man,the Spirite that hath power of the ayre,and a roaring lyon:
thefe defciiptions ferue to no other purpofe : but to make vs more
ware and watchefulj and readier to entre in battaile with him.Which
is alfo fometime fet out in exprefle wordes . For Peter after he had
faid 5 that the diuell goeth about like a roaring lyon , feking whom he
may dcuoure, byandby addeth this exhortation , that we Ihongly re-
fifte him by Faith . And Paule after he had geuen warning that we
wraftle not with flefti and bloud, but with the princes of the ayre,thc
powers of darkenc'iTe , and fpirituall wickednefles , byandby biddeth
vs put on fuch armour as may ferue for fo great & daungerous a bat-
taile. Wherfore lette vs alfo applie all to this ende , that being war-
ned how there doth continually approche vpon vs an enemic , yea an
cnnemy that is in courage moft hardy ,in ftrength moft mighty ,in po-
hcies moft futtle, in diligence and celeritie vnweriable, with all fortes
of cngins plenreoufly furnilhcd, in f kill of warre moft ready, we fuf-
fcr not our felues by flouth and cowardife to be furprifed , but on the
other fide with bolde and hardy mindes fet our foote to refift him : &
( becaufe this warre is onely ended by Death ) encourage our felues
to continue . But fpecially knowing our owne wcaknefle and vnf kil-
fulneflfe let vs call vpon the helpe of God*and cnterprife nothing but
vpon truft of him , for as much as it is in him onely to geue vs po-
licie^ftrengthjcourageand armour.
14 And that we fhould be the more ftirred vp and enforced fo to
do, the Scripture warncth vs , that there are not one or two or a fewe
enemieSjbut great armies that make warre with vs . For it is faid,that
Mar.itf, Mary Magdalene was deliuered from fcuen deuils, wherwith fhe was
> poffefled. And Chrift faith^that it is the ordinary cuftome,that if after
a deuill be ones caft out, a man make the place open againcjhe brin-
Mar.i2. gcthfeuenfpiritcsworfethan himfelfe, and returneth into hispof-
4*' fcflion,finding it empty.Yea it is faid that a whole legion befieged one
^' ' man. Hereby therefore we are taught, that we muft tight with an infi-
nite multitude of enemies, leaft dcfpiling the fewcnefle of them we
fhould be more flacke to enter m battaile , or thinking that we haue
fbme refpire in the meane time granted, we fliould geue our felues to
idelnefle. Where a5 many times Sathan or the diuell is named in the
fingular numbre , thereby is meant that power of wickedntfTe which
ftandeth againft the kingdome of luftice . For as the Church and the
fcllowfhipof fainteshauc Chrift to their head, fo the fadion of the
wicked is painted out vnto vs with their prince , that hath the chicfc
> autho-
God the Creator. Lib.i. 5P
authoritie among them. After which mancr this is fpoken.Go ye cur- Mac.25.
fed into ecernall fire that is prepared for the deuill and his angels. 4«'
i<) Here alfo this ought to ftirre vs vp to a perpeiuall warre with
the dcuill , for that he is eucry where called the enemy of God and
of vsJFor if we haue regarde of Goddes glory,as it is mete we fliould, ^
then ought we with all our force to bende our felues againft him,thac
goeth about to extinguifli it . If we be affedioned to maintaine the
kingdome of Chrift as we ought , then muft we cedes haue an vnap-
peafable warre with him that confpireth the ruine therof . Againe , if
any care of our owne fafetie do touch vs , then ought we to haue nei-
ther peace nor truce with him that continually hcth inwaiteforthc
deftrudion of it. Such a one is he defcribed in the 5. chap, of Gencfis
where he leadeth man away from the obedience that he did owe to
God, that he both robbeth God of his due honor, and throweth ma
him fclfe headlong into deftrudion. Such a one alfo is he fet forth in ^^^ ^
the Euangeliftes , where he is called an enemy , and is faid to fcatter j g/
tares , to corrupt the fedc of ecernall life . In a fumme > that which lohn 8.
Chrift teftifieth of him, that from the beginning he was a murtherer, 44.
and a licr, we finde by experience in all his doingcs . For he afiailech
the trueth of God with lies , obfcurcch the light with darkeneflVjen-
tangleth the mindes of men with errors, raifeth vp hatredes, kindleth
contentions and ftrifcs,dorh all thinges to this ende to ouei throw the
kingdome of God , and drownc men with himfelfe in eternall deftru-
dion. Wherby appcreth , that he is of nature froward , fpitefull and
malicious. For nedes muft there be great frowardnefl'e in that witte,
that is made to affaile the glory of God and faluation of men^ And
that doth lohn fpeake of in his epiftle , when he writethjihat he fin-
neth from the beginning.For he meaneth that he is the author,cap-
taine and principall workeman of all malice and wickednefle.
16 But forafmuch as the deuill was created by God,let vs remem-
bre that this malice which we affigne in his nature, is not by creation
but by deprauatio. For what fo euer damnable thing 'ie hathjhe hath
gotten to himfelfe by his owne reuolting and fall . Which the Scrip-
ture therefore gcueth vs warning of, leaft thinking that he came out
fuch a one from God , we fhould afcribe that to God himfelfe which
is fartheft fro him:For this reafon dothChrift fay that Satha fpeaketh
of his owne when he fpeaketh hes, and addeth a caufe why , for that
he ftode not ftill in the trueth. Now when he faith that he ftode not
ftill in the trueth, he fhe weth that ones he had bin in the trueth. And lohn 5»
when he maketh him the Father of lying, hetaketh this from him, '^'^'
thachecaanotiaychacfaultcoGodwherof he himfelfe is caufe to
H iij.
Cap.i 4- Of the knowledge of
himlclfe. Although thefe thinges be but fhortly and not very plainly
fpokcn , yet this is enough for this purpofe to dehuer the maieftic of
God from all fclaunder . Andwhatmakethitmatterto vs,to know
more or to any other purpofe concerning deuils ? Many perhaps do
' grudge,thac the Scripture doth not orderly and diftindly in many pla-
ces fet forth that fail and the caufe,manner,time, and faihion thereof.
But becaufe thefe thinges do nothing perteine to vs , it was better , if
not to be fuppreffcd wholly , yet to be but lightly touched , and that
pardy, becaufe it was not bcfeming for the Holy ghoft to (edc curi©-
iitic wirh vainc hiftories without any frute : and we fc that it was the
Loides purpofe to put iiothing in his holy oracles but that which wc
fhould leaine to ediHcation. Therfore , left we our felues (hould tary
long vpon thinges fuperfluous, let vs be content fliortly to know thus
much coccrning the nature of deuils,that at the firft creatio they were
the An.'^els of God:butby fwaruing out of kinde they both deftroyed
1 Pet a t^^'^'^'^^cl^^s and are become inftrumcntes of deftrudio to orher.Thus
^.. * much,becau(eit was profitable to be knowen, is plainly taught in l^e-
lud.K ter and ludc. God fpared not(fiy they) his Angels which had finned,
** . and not kept their beginning , but had forfaken their dwelling place.
i- im.S And Paule naming the eleit Angels doth without dout fecretly by
iinphcation fet the reprobate Angels in companion againft them.
1 7 As for the difcoide and ilnfe that we fay is beiwenc God and "'
Satan, we muft fo take it that ftiU wc holdc this for certaine , that he
lob 1.6 can do nothing but by the will and fufferaunce of God. For we readc
and i.u in the hiitorie of lob , that he prefcnied himfelfe before God to re-
ceiue his commaundemetes,and durft notgo forwarde to do any en*
I. Kings terprife till h j had obtained licence. So when Achab was to be decei-
i 2. 2o. y ed ^ he tokc vpon him that he woulde be the Spirite of lying in the
mouth of all the Prophetes,and fo being fente of God he performed
ic.For this reafon is he called the euill Spirite of the Lord that torme-
ted Saul , becaufe by him as with a fcourge the finnes of the wicked
king were puniflied. And in another place it is writtejijthat the plages
were laied vpon the Egyptians by the euil angels. According to thefe
particular examples Paule doeth generally teftific>th3t the blinding of
the wicked is the worke of God , wheras before he had called it the
working of Satan It is euidcnt therfore that Satan is vnder the power
of God, and fo gcuerned by his authoritie that he is compelled to do
him ftruice.Now whe wc fay that Sata rclifteth God,that the workes
of Satan di fagree with the workes of God,we do therewithal! affirmc
that this difagrement and ftrifc hang^th vpon the fufferauncc of God.
I fpcakc not now of his will , nor of his cndeuour , but of the eftcft
onely.
I.S''.i 6
»4. and
i8<iO.
Pfa. 34-
a. The, a
>
God the Creator. Lib.i. 60
onely . For fith the deuill is wicked of nature , he is not enclmed to *
obey the will of God, but is wholly carryed to flubborrmcffe and
rebellion. This therfore he hath of himfclfe and of his owne wickcd-
neffe, that of defire and purpofc he withftandeth God. And by this
wickedncs he is ftirrcd vp to the enterprifing of thofe things that he
knoweth to be moft againft God. But bccaufe God holdeth him h^k.
tied andreftrained with the bridle of his power, he executeih onely
thofc thinges that are graunted him from God. And fo doth he obey
his creator whether he will or no , becaufe he is conftraincd to apphc
his feruice whether foeuer God compelleth him.
18 Now becaufe God boweth the vncleane Spirices hether and
thether as pleafeth him, he fo tempereth this gouernementjthat tiiey
exercife the faithfuU with batrail , they fet vpon them out of ambu-
fhcs>they aflaile them with inuallonSj they prelTe them wuh fighting,
and oftetimes werry themjtrouble themjmake them afraied,& fome-
limcwounde them, but neueroucrcome noropprelfc them . But the
wicked they fubdue and drawc awaye , they rcignc vpon their foules
and bodies, and abufe them as bond/laues to all mifcheuous doinges.
Asforthcfaithfulljbecaufetheyare\Tiquieted offuch enemies,ther-
fore they hcare ihefc exhortations . Do not geue place to the deuil!. Ephe.4.
The deuill your cnemie goeth about as a rcring hon fcking whom he ^T-
may deuoure,whom refillye being flrong in faith and fuch iike.PauIe L' ^^^*^*
confeireth ihat he himfelfe was not free from this kinde of ftnfe whe ^ x.ox
he faieth, that for a remedy to tame pride,rhe Angel of Satan was ge- 1 2.7.
uen to him, by whom he might be humbled. This exercife therrore is
common to all the children of God. But becaufe that famcpromife q^^ .^
of the breaking of Satans head pcrteineth generally to Chnft and to 15.
all his members, therfore I fay that the faithful! can neuer be oucr-
come nor opprefTed by him.They are many times llriken down, but
they are neuer fo aftonnied withall but that they recouer themff lues.
They fall downe many times with violence of ftrokes , but they arc
after raifed vp againc:thcy arc wouded hut not deadly. Finally they ^o
labor in all the courfe of their life that in the ende they obteinc the vi-
dorie: but I fpeakc not this of euery doing of theirs. Forweknowc
that by the iufte vegeaunce of God Dauid was for a time geuen ouer 2. Sam
to Satan,by his motion to number the people: and not without caufe :4.r.
Paule faith there is hope of pardon left ifany haue bin entangled Rom.itf
with the fnares of the deuill. Therefore in an other place the lame
Paule faieth , that the promife aboue alleged 'i% begonne in this life,
wherin we muft wraftle , and is performed after our wraftling ended:
when he faieth che Godlof peace fliall flioitly beate downe Satan ? n-
H iiij.
20.
Cap. 14. Ofthe knowledge of
der your feece. This vidoric hath alway fully bin in our head Chrift,
becaufe the Prince ofthe worlde had nothing in him , but in vs that
are his members it doth now partly appcare and {halbe perHted, whc
being vnclothed of our flclh by which we are yet fubied to weakc-
neffe , we ilialbe full of the power of the Holy ghoft. In this manner
when the kmgdome of Chrill is ray fed vp and aduaunced, Satan with
his power faileth downe as the Lord himfelfe faith. I faw Satan fall
as a lightening downe from heaucn . For by this aunfwere he confir-
meth that which the Apoftles had reported ofthe power of his prea-
Luc.io. ching. At^aine, When the Prince pofTeffeth his owne palace, all
^^' thinges that he pofl'effeth are in peace, but when there commeth a
j^"^* * Wronger, he is throwcn out. &c. And to this ende Chrill in dying,
ouercamc Satan which had the power of death , and triumphed vpon
all his armies that they ihould not hurt the Church , for otherwifc
they would euery moment a hundred times deftroy it . For ( confi-
dering what is our weakeneffe , and what is his furious ftrength ) how;
coulue weftande, yeaneuer fo little time againft his manifolds and
continu.iU affaultcs , but being fupported by the victory of our cap-
taiuer'Thcrfore God fufFererh not the deuill to reigne ouer the foules
ofthe faithfuU , but onely dehuereth him the wicked and vnbeleiiing
to goucrne,whom God doth not vouchefaue to haue reckened in his
fiocke. Foritisfaid that hcpoirelTcth this worlde without contro-
2. Cor. ueifie till he be thruft out by Chrift . Againe,that he doth blindc all
4'-^' them that beleue not theGofpel,againe,that he performeth his worke
Eph.2. in the ftubborne children, and worthily, for all the wicked are the
*' veflfelles of wrath . Therfore to whom fhould they be rather fubie<ft
than to the minifter of Goddes vengeaunce ? Finally they are faied
lohn.a. jQ {jp r.( tfjgij. father the deuill , becaufe as the faithfull are hereby
f lohn ^"ow^" to bs the children of God becauie they beare his image ; Co
j.U. they by the image of Satan into which they are gone out of kinde,are
properly difcerned to be his children.
19 As we haue before confuted that trifling philofophic concer-
ning the holy Angels , which teacheth that they are nothing els but
good infpirations or motions,which God ftirreth vp in the mindes of
men: fo in this place muft we confute them that fondly fay thatdeuils
are nothing els but coill aftedions or perturbations of minde,that arc
thruft into vs by bur flelh. That may we fhortly do , becauie there be
mnny tcftimonies of ScripturCj& thofe plaine enough vpo this point.
Fuft wher the vncleane Spiritcs arc called. Angels Apoftataes,which
haue fwarued out of kinde from their beginmng , the very names do
fufficicntl/ cxpreffc that they aie not motions or affcdions of mindes,
buc
God the Creator. Lib.i. 61
but rather in dede as they be called mindes or Spiritcs endued with
fcnfe and vnderftanding. Likewife whereas both Chrift and lohn do i.toh.j
compare the children of God with the children of the deuill: were it 8.
notanvnfit comparifon, if the name of the deuill figniHed nothing
clfe but euill infpirations ? And lohn addeth fomewhat more plaine-
ly 5 that the deuill finneih from the beginning. Likewjfe when lude
brin!7,eth in Michael the archangel! fighting with the deuill, doutlefle
he fcrtcth againft the good Angell an cuill and rebcUious Angell.
Wherewith agreeth that whichisreadinthehiftory of Iob,thacSa- lob.i.i
tan appeared with the holy Angels before God . But moft playne of
all are thofc places that make metion of the punifhment which they
begin to fels by the iudgement of God, and fpecially fhall fele at the
refarredion . Sonne of Dauid why art thou come before the time to
torment vs? Againe, Go ye curfed into the eternall fire tiiat is prepa- Matt, t
red for the deuill and his Angels. Againe)Tf hefparednothisowne ^9.
Angtis that had finned, but caft them downe into hell and deliuered ^^'*^
them into cheinesor darkcnelfe to be kept vnto damnation. &c. iud.i.«
How fond fhould thefe fpeeches be , that the deuills arc ordayned to
eternall iudgemenr, that fier is prepared for them , that they are now
already tormented and vexed by the glory of Chrift : if thpre were no
deuils at all ? But bccaufc this matter needeth no difputation among
them that beleue the word of the Lord , and little good is done with
tcftimonies of Scripture among thofe vaync ftudentes of fpecula-
tion,wbom nothing pleafeth but that which is new: I fuppofc I haue
performed that which I purpofed , that is that the godly mindes
Ihould be furnilhed againft fuch fond crrours, wherewith vncjuiet mc
do trouble both th-mfclues and other that be more fimple.But it was
good to touch this, leaft any entangled with that errour , while they
thinke they haue none tottand againft them,ftiould waxe more flow
and vnprouided to refift.
2o In the meane time lette it not be weryfome vnto rs , in this Co
beautifull a ftagc to take a godly delight of the maniteft and ordina-
ry workes of God. For, as I haue elfewhere already fayd, though this
be not the chiefe , yet is it in order the firft dodrine of Faith , to re-
member that what way foeuer we turne our eyes , all that we fee are
the workes of God , and with godly confideration to wey for what
end God did make them . Therefore that we may conceiue by Faith
fo much as behoueth vs to know of God , it is good firft of all to
learne the hiftory of the creation of the world , how it is fliortly re-
hcarfcd by Mofes, and afterward more largely fette out by holy men,
fpecially by Bafile and Ambrofc.Out of it we (hall ieame that God by
Cap.14. of the knowledge of
tlie power of his word and Spirits created heauen aiid earth of no»
thing, and thereof brought foorthall Uuing creatures and thinges
without hfe 5 with maruelious order difjjofed the innumerable varie-
ty of thinges^to euery thing he gaue the propre nature,afligned their
offices, appointed their places and abidinges , and where all thinges
are fubJe<^ to corruption, yet hath he foprouided that of all fortes
fome {halbe preferued fafe to the laft dayjand therefore fome he che-
rifheth by fccretc meanes , and powreth now and then as it were a
new huehnefTe into them , and to fome he hath gmen the power to^
cncreafe by generation , that in their dying that whole kinde (hould
not dye together. So hath he maruelloufly garnifhed the heauen and
the earth, with fo abfolutely perfed plenty, variety and beauty of all
thinges as poffibly might be , as it v/ere a large and gorgeous houfe
tumiHicd and ftored with aboundanceof moft finely chofcnftufFc,
laft of all how in framing man and adorning him with (o godly beau-
ty , and with fo many and fo great giftes , he hath (liewed m him the
moft excellent example of all his workes . But becaufe it is not my
purpofe at this prefent to fet forth at large the creation of the world,
let It fuffice to haue ones agayne touched thefe few thinges by the
way. For it is better, as I haue already v.'^ined the readcrs,to fetch a
fuller vnderftanding of this matter out of Mofes and other, that haue
faithfully and dihgently conucyed the hiftory of the world by writing
to perpetuall memory.
21 It IS to no purpofe , to make much a do in difputing , to what
end this confideration of the workes of God ought to tende , or to
what maike it ought to be applied : forafmuch as in other places al-
ready a great parte of this qucftion is declared , and fo much as be-
longeth to our prefent purpofe may in few wordes be ended . Truely
if we were minded to fet out as it is worthy, how ineftimablc wifdom,
po\Ver,iuftice and gcodncfle of God appeareth in the framing of the
woild,no eloquenccno garnilhmet of rpeech,could fuffice the large-
neffis of fo great a matter. Andnodoutitis Godspleafure that we
(hould be continually occupied in fo holy a meditatiojthat while we
behold in his creatures as in looking glaffes the infinite richefleof
his wifdom,iuftice bountie and power, we fliould not runne ouer the
as it were with a flying eye, or with a vayne wandring looke as I may
fo call itjbut that we fliould with confideration reft long vpon them,
caft them vp and downe earneftly and faithfully in ourmindes , and
oft repeate them with remembrance.But becaufe we arc now buficd
in that kinde that pertayncth to order of teaching, it is mete that we
omit thofe thinges that recjuirelong declamations. Therefore , tobc
fhort.
God the Creator. Lib.i. 6i
flrort, let the readers know, that then they haue conceiucd by Faith,
what this meaneth,that God is the creator of heauen & earthjif they
firft follow this vniuerfall rule, that they pafle not ouer with not con-
lidering or forgetfulnelfe of thofe vcrtues, that God prefenieth to be
fcene in his creatures , then , that they fo Icarne to apply themfelue*
that they may therwith be throughly moued in their hartes. The fiift
of thofe we do when we conlider how excellent a workmans workc
it was,to place and aptly fet in {o well difpofed order the multitude of
the ftarrcs that is in heauen , that nothing can be deuifed more beau-
tifull to behold : to fettc and faften fome of them in their (landings fo
that they can not moue,and to otherfome to graunt a free courfe,but
fo that in mouing they wander not beyond their appointed fpace , fo
to temper the motion of them all that it may diuide in mcafure the
dayes and nightes, mone£hes,ycarcs and feafons of the ye3re,and to
brmg tiiis inequality of dayes which we dayly fee to fuch a tempered
order rhat it hath no confufion. Likewife, when we markc his power
in fuftcyning fo great a body,in gouerning the fo fwift whirling about
of the engine of heauen, and fuch like. Fot thefe few examples do
fufficicntly declare what it is to record the power of God in the crea-
tion of the world. For elfe if I ihould trauaile as I fayed to cxpreflTc
it sli in wordes , I inould ncuer make an end , forafmuch as there arc
fo many miracles of the power of Godjfo many tokens of his good-
ncffejfo many examples of his wifdom,as there be formes ofthingcs
in the world5ye3 as there be things either great or fmale.
2 z Now remaineth the other part which commeth ncrcr to Faith,
that while we confider rhat God hath ordayned all thinges for our
garde and fafety, and therewithall do fete his power and grace in our
felues, and in fo great good things that he hath beftowed vpon vs:wc
may thereby ftirre vp our felues to the truft , inuocation , prayfe and
lone of him. Now as I haue before fayd , God himfelfe hath (hewed
in the very order of creation,that for mans fake he created all thinges.
For it IS net wirhoutcaufc thathediuided the making of the world
into fix dayes , whereas it had bin as ea(ie for him in one moment to
haue in all pointes^ccomplifhed his whole worke , as it was by fuch
proceeding from peeceto pcecc to come to the end of it. But then it
plcafed him to fhew his prouidece & fatherly carefulnelTe toward vs,
that before he made man he prepaied all that he forefaw (hould be
profitable for hinT,3nd (itte for his preferuatio. How great vnthanke-
fulneffe nowfliould it be to dout whether this good Father do care
for vs,whom we fee to haue bin carefull for vs ere that we wcr e born?
How wicked were it to tremble for diftiuillcaft his goodnefl'e would
Cap.ij. Ofthe knowledge of
it any time Icaue vs deftitute in neceflity, which wc fee was difplaicd
for vs being not yet borne,with great aboundance of al good things.
je.i.a<5 Bcfide that we heare by Mofes that by his liberality alj that cuer is m
,&.^. 2. the world is made fubied to vs . Sure it is that he did it not to mockc
vs with an empty name of gift . Therefore we Hiall neucr lacke any
thing,fo farre as it {hall be auaylable for our preferuation. Finally to
make an end/o oft as we mme God the creator of heauen & earth,
Icttc this come in our mindes withalljthat the difpofitio of all things
which he hath create , is in his hand and power, and that we are his-
children whom he hath taken into his ownc charge and kcping to
fofter and bring vptthat we may looke for a! good things at his hand,
and afluredly truft that he will neuer fafFer vs to lacke things neede -
full for our fafetVjto the end our hope (hculdhang vpon none other:
y whatfocuer we defire our prayers may be dircded to him : of what
thing foeuer we receiue profit we may acknowledge it to be his be-
V nefit,and confcfle it with thankes giuing : that being allured with fo
great fwetcnefle of his goodnelle andlibcrality,we may ftudy to lou«
«nd honor him with all our hart.
The XV. Chapter.
VVhataone man vvoi created: wherein there it entreated of tht
powers ofthe fouU, of the image ofGod^offree vvtli &
of the frfi integrity of nature.
NOw muft we fpcake ofthe creation of man , not onely bc-
caufe he is among all the workes of God the moft noble and
moft excellent example of his iuftice, wifdom and goodncs:
but alfo becaufe as we haue fayd in the beginning , we can-
not plainly and pcrfeftly know God, vnkfle we haue withal a mutuall
knowledge of our felues. Although y fame knowledge beof two^forts,
the one to know what wc were created at the firft beginning , the o-
ther to know what our cftate began to be after the fall of Adam f for
it were but to fmall profit for vs to know our creationjvnlclfe we did
alfo in this lamentable fall know what is the corruption and defor-
mity of our nature: ) yet at this time we will be content with dcfcri-
ption of our nature when it was pure. And before we defccnd to this
miferable eftate whercunto man is now in thraldome , it is good to
learne what a one he was created at the beginning. For we muft take
hede that in precifely declaring onely the naturall cuils of man , wc
feme not to impute the to the author of nature.For vngodlines thin-
kerh he- felfe to haue fufficient defenfe in this colour,if it may lay for
hei: felfe chat whatfoeucc fault ihc hath, the fame did after a certaine
mdnuer
God the Creator. Lib.i. ^3
manner proceede from God , and fticketh not if flie be accufed , to
quarell with God, and to lay the fault vpon him whereof fhe is wor-
thely accufed . And they that would fceme to fpcake fomwhat more
reueretly of the maicftyof God,yet do willingly fecke to cxcufe their
owne wjtckcdneflejby nature, not contidering that therin though not
opely they blame God alfo, to whofe rcproch it (liould fall if it were
proued that there is any fault in nature.Sith then we fee that our ftclK
gapeth for all the wayes to efcape,wherby fhe thinketh the blame of
her owne euils may any way be put of from her , we muft diligently
trauaill to mete with this mifchiefe.Therefore we muft fo handle the
calamity of mankinde that wc cut of all excure,and dcUuer the iufticc
of God from all accufanon . Afterward in place conuenient we (hall
fee how far men be now from that pureneflc that w.ns giue to Adam.
And firft we muft remember, that in this that man was taken out of
earth and clayja bridle was put vpon his pride,for there is no greater
abfurdity, than for them to glory in their excellency that do not on-
ly dwell in a cotagc of clay,but alfo are thcmfelues in parte but earth
and afhcs. But forafmuch as God did not onely vouchfaue to giue life
vnto an earthen veffcll , but alfo it was his pleafure that it fhould be
the dwelling houfe of an immortall Spirite,Adam might iuftly glory
in fo great hberality of his maker.
a Now it is not to be douted that man confifleth of foulc and bo-
dy , and by the name of foule I meane an immortall elTcnce , and yet
created , which is the nobler parte of him . Sometime it is called the
Spiritc . Albeit when thefe two names Soule and Spirite are ioyned
togciher,ihey difter one from the other in fignificatio, yet when Spi-
rite is fette by it felfe it meaneth as much as Soule . As, when Salo- eccI.«»
mon fpeaking of death, fayth that then the Spirite returnethto him 7.
that gaue it. And Chrift commending his Spirite to his Father , and Luc.aj*
Stephen his Spirite to Chrift do both meane none other thing but''^^
that when the Soule is dchuered from the prifon of the flefli, God is ^ *'*
the perpetuallkeper of it. As for them that imagine that the Soule is
therfore called a Spirite becaufe it is a breath or a power by God in-
fpired or poured into bodies which yet hath no eflence: both y thing
it felfe & all the Scripture fhewcth that they do to much grofly erre.
True ii is that while men are faftcned to the earth more than they
ought to be,thcy waxe dull , yea becaufe they are eftranged from the
Father of hghtes they are bhnded with darkeneficjfo that they do not
thinke vpon this, that they llir.ll remaine aliue after dc ath. And yet is
not that light fo quenched in darkeneffe , but that they be touched
with fome fcling of immortality.Surcly the confcience which difcer-
Cap. 15. Of the knowledge of
ning betwcne good and euill anfwereth the iudgcment of God^is an
vndouted figne of an immorcall Spirite.For how could a nioti5 with-
out eflence attaine to come to the iudgement feate of God,& throw
it felfe into fcare by finding her owne g-kinefle ? For the body is not
moucd with feare of a Spiritual! peine , bur thatfalleth onely vppoa
the foulcWheiby it foUoweth that the foule hath an elTence.Moreo-
uerthe very knowledge of God doth proue that the fbules which a-
fcende vp aboue the world are immortall : for a vanifhingliuelineflTc
were not able to attayne to the fountayne of life. Finally forafmuch as"
fo many excellent gifts wherewith mans minde is endued, do cry out
that there is fome diuine thing engrauen it , there are euen fo many
teftimonies of an immortall elfence. For that fenfe which is in brute
ber.ftcs , goeth not out of the body , or at leaft extendeth no further
than to things prcfemly let before it.But the nimblenefl'e of the minde
of man which veweth the heauen and earth and fecrctes of nature,&
comprehending all ages in vnderftandingand merr.ory , digefteth e-
uery thing in order and gathereth thinges to come by thingcs paft,
doth plainly Ihew that there lyeth hidden in man a cerraine thing fe-
ucrall from the body . We conceiue by vnderftandingthe inuifiblc
God and Angells,which the body can not do.We know thinges that
be right,iuft,& honeit, which are hidden fro the bodily fcnfes. Thcr-
fore It muft needes be that the Spiritc is the feate ot this vnderftan-
ding. Yea and our fleepe it felfe, which aftonieth a man and feemeth
to take life away from him , is a plaine witnefle of immortality, foraf-
much as it doih not only minifter vnto vsjthoughtcs ofthofe thinges
that neuer were done , but alfo foreknowinges of thinges for time to
come. I touch thefe things fliortly which euen prophane wryters do
excellently fette out with more gorgeous garnilhment of wordes:but'
with the godly readers a fim pie putting m minde of them fliallbe fuf-
ficient . Now if the foule were not a certaine thing by it felfe feucrall
from the body,thc Scripture would not teach that we dwell in houfes
of clay , that by death we remoue out of the Tabernacle of the fle(h,
that we do put of that which is corruptible, that finally at the laft day
we may receiue reward euery man as he hath behaued himfelfe in his
bodv.For thefe places and other ihac we do ech where comonly light
vpon,do not only manifcftly diftinguifli the foule from the body, but
alfo in giuing to the foule the name of man do (hew that it is the prin-
cipall parte . Now whereas Paule doth exhort the faithfuU to clenfc
,Cor7 themfelues from all d:;fihng of the fielli and the Spirite , he maketh
two partes of man wherein abideth the filthineffe of finne. And Pe-
!""** let where he callcth Chrill the ihcpeherde & bifliop of foules,(houlcJ
^* haue
God the Creator. Lib.i. ^4
haue fpoken fondly if there were no foules about whom he might i.Pet.i,
execute that office. Neither would that conueniently ftand together 9'
which he fayth of the eternal faluation of foules, and where he bid- * P««'3'
deth to clenfe our foulcs,and where he fayth that euil defircs do fight
againll the foule, and where the author of the Epiftic lo the Hebrues Hcb.i.l
fayethjthat the Paftors do watch that they may ycld accompt for our ^6.
foules J vnlcfle it were true that foules had a proper efl'ence . To the
fame purpofe feruethit that Paul calleth God for witnelTe to his owa
foule,becaufe it could not be called in iudgement before God vnlcfle
ic were fubied to punifhment. And this is alfo more plaincly expref- Mar.io.
fed in the wordes of Chrift , when he biddeth vs to feare him which 28.
after that he hath killed the body , can throw t!ie foulc into hell fier. w"*^ ^' ^
Now where the author of the Epiftle to the Hebrues doth diftinguilh
the Fathers of our fledi fr5 God,\vhich is the only Father of Spirits,
he would not othcrwife more plainely affirme the eflcnce of foulles,
Moreouer,if the foules remayned not aliue being deliucred from the
prifos of their bodies, Chrift fhould very fondly haue brought in the Lucicf,
foule of Laiarus ioying in the bofome of Abraham, and agayne the ^**
foule of the richman fubied to horrible tormentcs . The fame thing
doth Paulconfirme whenheteacheththat we wander abroadc from ^ q^j,,
God, fo long as we dwell in the flefh , and that we enioy his prefence A,a.» j»
being out of the fleHi. But,becaufe I will not be long in a matter that 8.
is not obfcure,! will adde only this out of Luke,that it is reckened a-
mog the errours of the Sadduces that they did not belcuc that there
were any Spiritesand Angels.
5 Alfo a ftrong proufe hereof may be gathered of this where
it is fayd , that man is create like to the image of God . For although Gc.i.iy
' . the glory of Goddoappeareiniheoutwardelhapeof man,yetisic
no dout that the propre feate of the image of God is in the foule . I
do not deny that as concerning our outv/ard fhape , in afmuch as the
fame doth diftinguilkand feuere vs from brute beaftes, we do alio
therein more nerely apprcch to God than they : neither will T much
ftad againli the which thinke that this is to be accoptcd of the image
of Godjthat where al other liuing creatures do grouellingvvife behold
the groundjto man is giucn an vpright face,and he is commaunded to
looke vppon the heauen , and to aduaunce his countenance towarde
the ftarrestfo that this rcmayne ccrtaine,that y image of God which
*• is feene appeareth in thefc outward (ignes , is fpirituall. For Oiiander
(whom his writings declare to haue bin in fickle imaginations fondly
witty ) referring the image of God without difference as well to the
body as to the foulc^m ingle th heauen & carih together.For he fayth^
Cap. 15. Of the knowledge of
that the Fathcr,the Sontie,and the Holy goft did fettle their image in
man , becaufe though Adam hadde Ihnd without falling , yet fiiould
Clirift haue become man. And fo by their opinion the body that was
appoynted for Chrift , was but an example or figure of that bodily
fhapc which then was formed. But where (hall he finde that Chrift is
the image of the Spirite ? I graunt in deede that in the Perfon of the
Mediatour ihineth the glory of the whole Godheade . But how (hall
the eternall worde be called the image of the Spirite whom he goeth
before in order? Finally it oucrthrowerh the difttndion betwene the
Sonne and the Holy ghoft , if he do here call him his image. Moreo-
uer I would fayne learne of him how Chrift doth rcfcmblc the Holy
ghoft in the flefn that he tooke vppon him, and by what markes and
features he doth expreffe the likencffe of him. And where as this fay-
ing:Let vs make man after our imagc,doth alfo belong to the Perfon
of the Sonne , it foUoweth , that he muft be the image of himfelfe:
which is againft all realon. Belide that, if Ofiandersmucntion be be-
leued,man was failiioned onely after the figure and paterne of Chrift
in that he was man, and fo that forme out of which Adam was taken,
was Chrift, in that that he was to be clothed with fle(h, where as the
Scripture in a forre other meaning teacherh,that he was create in the
image of God.But their futtle inuention is more colourable which do
thus expound it,that Adam was create in the image of God , becaufe
he was fafhioned like vnto Chrift , which is the onely image of God.
But that expolluon alfo is not found . Alfo (bme interpreters make a
great difputation about Image and LikenefTe, while they feeke a dif-
ference betwene thofetwo wordes, where is no difference at all,ray-
ing that this word Likenefle is added to expound the other . Firft we
know that among the Hebrues fuch repetitions are common, wher-
in they exprelfe one thing twife : and in the thing it felfe there is no
dout,but that man is therefore called the image of God,becaufe he is
like to God.Wherby appeareththat'ihey are to be laughed at,which
do fo futtelly argue about the wordes,whether they appoint Zelem,
that IS to fay,Image in the fubftaunce of the foule,or Demuth, that is
to fayjLikeneffe in the quahties,or what other thing foeuer it be that
they tcach.For where as God determined to create man after his own
imagc>rhis being fomewhat darkely fpoken he doth as by way of ex-
plicario repete it in this faying, After his likeneire,as if he would hauc
iaydjthat he would make man,in whom he would reprcfcnt himfelfe,
as in an image, becaufe of the markes of likenefle graucn in him. And
thcrforc Mofes a little after reciting the fame thing,doth repeate the
Image of God twife , leauing out the name of Likenefle. And it is a
trifiino
God the Creator. Lib. i . 6^
trifling obicftion that Ofeander maketh , that not a parte of man, or
the loule only with the gifces thcrof, is called the Image of God, but
the whole Adam which had his name giuen him of the earth , from
whence he was taken . Trifling, I fay, will all readers that h;iuc theyr
found wic iudge this obicdion. For where whole man is called mor-
tall.yet is not y foulc therby made fubied to mortality. Againe where
he IS called a huing creature endued vfith reafojit is not therby meant
that the body hath reafon and vnderftanding. Although therforc the
foulc is not the whole man^yct is it notinconuenicnt, that maninre-
fpcd of the foule be called the image of God , albeit 1 hold ftill that
principle which I haue before ftablifhedjthatthe Image of God ex-
tcndeth to the whole excellece,wherby the nature of man hath pree-
minence among all kindes ofhuing creatures.Therefore in that word
is noted the integrity that man had when he was endued with right
vnderftanding, v/hen he had his affedion framed according to reafon,
and all his fenfes gouerned in right order, and when in excellent gifts
he did iruely refemble the excellence of his Creator. And though the
principall feare of the image of God were in the minde & hart , or in
the foule and the powers therof,yet was there no parte of man,not fo
much as the bodyjwherin did not fome fparkes thereof appearc.Cer-
taine it is, that alio in all the partes of the world, there do fnine fome
refemblanccs of the glory of God:wherby we may gather that where
it is fayd,that his Image is in man, there is in fo faying a certain fecrct
comparifon, that auaunceth man aboue all other creatures, & doth as
it werefeuerc him from the commo forte.Ncither is it to be denied. Mat. tz
that the Angels were create after the hkenefle of God, f!th(as Chrilt jff*
himfelfe teftilieth) our chiefe perfedion fliall be to become like vnto
the. But not without caufe doth Mofes by that peculiar title fet forth
the grace of God toward vs,fpecially ^ere he compareth only vifi-
ble creatures with man,
4 But yet it fecmcth that there is not giuen a full definition of th€
imageof God, vnleffe it plainlier appeare in what qualities ma excel-
leth:& wherby he ought to be compted a gla{re,re{embhng the glory
of God. But that can be by no other thing better knowcn, than by the
rcpayring of mans corrupted nature. FirlTit is doutlefifejthat when A-
d.im fell from his eftate, he was by that departure tftraged from God.
Wherefore although we graunt that the Image of God was not al-
together defaced and blotted our in him, yet was it fo corrupted, that
all that remayneth, is but vggly deformity .Therefore the beginning
of recouery of fafety for vs, is in that reftoring which we obtayne by
Chrift , who is alfo for the fame caufe called the feconde Adam, be-
1
Cap. 1 5. Of the knowledge of
I. Cor. cau(c hereftorcd vsvmotrue andpcife<ft integrity. Foralthough>
15.45. where Pauledoth incomparifon fcttcthe quickening Spiritethat
Chrift gjucth to the faythfull, againft the Jiuing foule wherein Adam
was created, he fetteth foorth the more aboundant mcafure of grace
in the regeneration : yet doth he not take away this other principall
pointjihat this is the end of our regeneration,that Chrift fhould new
Col. 3. falhion vs to the image of God. Therefore in an other place he tea-
* ^' chcth , that the newe man is renucd according to the image of him
fcpU'4« j|^3j created him. Wherewith agreeth this faying:put on the new man
which is create according to God. Now it is to be f eene what Paule
dorh principally comprehend vnder this renuing. Firft he fpeaketh of
knowledge and after of pure righteoufnefie and holynelfe . Where-
by we gather that the image of God was fiift of all to be fecnc in the
\ lii^ht of the minde, in the vprightnclfe of hart, and foundnelTe of all
the paries . For although I graunt that this is a figuratiue phrafc of
fpecch to fet the parte for the whole : yet can not this principle be o-
uerthrowen , that that thing which is the chiefe in the renuing of the
^ image of God,w3S alfo the principall in the creation of him. And for
,g^ the fame purpofe makcth it that in an other place he teacheth, that
we beholding the glory of God with open facCjare transformed into
1' the fame image. Now do we fe how Chrift is the moflpcrfed image
/ of God , according to the which we being fafhioned are fo reftored,
that in true godlineffc , righteoufnefie, purenefl^e and vndetftanding,
we beare the image of God. Which principle being eftabhfticd,Oli-
anders imagination of ihc (hapc of our body doth eafily vanifh away
i.Cor. of It felfe. Where as the man alone is in Paulc called the Image and
»«*7» glory of God,and the woman is excluded from that degree of honor,
it appearetli by the reft of the text,that the fame is to be applied only
to ciuilc order of policy. But#hat vnder the name of image, whereof
we fpeake , is comprehended all that belongeth to the fpirituall and
cternalllife,l thinke it be already fufficicntly proued. And the fame
Ioh«i.4 '^'Jng doth lohn cofirme in other wordesrfaying that the light which
was fro the beginning in the eternal word of God was y light of me.
For where his purpofe was to praife y lingular grace of God, where-
by man excclleth all other liuing creatures to feuere him fro the com-
mon forte,becaufe he hath attayned no commo life, but ioyncd with
the light of vnderftanding, he therewithal! (hewcth how he was made
after the image of God . Therefore fith the image ofGod is the vn-
corruptcd excellence of the nature cf man > which {hincd in Adam
before his fall , and aftcrwarde was fo corrupted and almoft defaced,
that nothing remayneth fins that mine, but dilbrdcred. mangled,and
filthily
God the Creator, Lib.i . . 66
Slrhily (potted : yet the fame doth in fomc parte appcarc in the clecft,
infomuch as they arc regenerate, and lliall obtaync ner full bnghtncs
in hcauen.Buc that wc may know on what partes it conlifteth, it fhall
be good to entreate of the powers of the foule . for that fpecalatiuc ^'^' de
deuife of Augultine is not foiinde,where hefayeth that the foule is a £)j|.^*-
glajfe of the Trinity jbecaul'c that there are in it vnderftanding,will,& dei.iu '
memory. Neither is their opinion to be approued, which fette the I-
magc of God in the power of dominion giuen vnto him , as if he rc-
fembled God onely in this marke,that he is appointed lordc and pof-
fcflor of all thinge>, where as in dccdc the Image of God is properly
to be fought within him,and not vtithout him, and is an inward good
gift of the foule.
5 But before Igoanyfurther, itisneedefuUthatlmeetcwith the
doting errour of the Manichees , which Scruetto liath attempted to
bring in agayne in this age . VVhcrj it is fayd , that God breathed the ^' ^'''
breath of life into the face of man, they tiiought that the foBJe diddc
conuey into man the fubflance of God,as if fome portion of the im-
meafurable God were come into man. But it is eafic cuen Oiortely to
fliew how many grofle and foule abfurdities this dcuillini errour dra-
weth with it. For if the foule be by deriuation parte of the eifincc of
God,it fliall follow that y nature of God is fubied,not only to chauge ^
andpaffions, but alfo to ignorance , euillluftes, wcakeneffe, and all
kindes of vices.Nothing is more inconftant than roan, becaufe con-
trary motions do tofle and diuerfely draw his foule , oftentimes he is
blindc by ignorance, oft he yeldeth as vanquifhed eucn to fmale ttn-
tarions , and we know that the foule it fclfe is the (inke and receiucr
of all fihhintfle,al which things we muft afcribc to the nature of God,
if we graunt that the foule is of the eflence of God,or a fccrcte u;flo-
wmg of Godhcade. Who would not abhorre this monflious di.ui(e ? _ /
Traely in deedc doth Paule allege out of Aratus,rhat we arc the of- ^^ _
fpring of God , but in quality and not in fubftance , inafmuch as he 28.
hath garnifhed vs v/ith godly giftes , But in the mesne time to tearc
in fuoder the effence of the Creator,as to fay,ihat euery ma doth pof
feflc a partof itjis to much madnes.Therfore we muft certainly hoJd,
that the foules, although the image of God be grauen in them, were
no Icfle created than the angels were . And creation is not a pourmg
out ot one fubftance into an other, but a beginning of effence made
of nothing. And-although the fpinte of man came from God, and
in departing out of the flelh returneth to God , yens not forthwith
to be fayd , that it was taken out of his fubftance . And m this poy nc
alfc» Ofiandcr, while he gloneth in his illuiions, hath cnian^kd
Cap. 1 5. Of the knowledge of
himlelfe with an vngodly crrour, noc acknowledging the image of
God to be in ma without his effentiall iufticcas though God by the
ineltimable power of his holy fpirite could noc make vs hke vnto him
felfejVnleUe Chrift fliould fubftantially pourc himfelfe into vs. With
whatfocuer colour many do go about to difguife thefe deceites , yet
{hal they ncuer Co begile the eyes of the readers,that are in their right
witteSjbut that they will eafily fee that thefe things fauour of the Ma-
i.Cor.j nichees crrour. And where faint Paule entreateih of the rcftoring of
'^* this imagC;it may be readily gathered out of his wordes,that man was
made of like forme to God, not by inflowing of his fubftance,but by
\ grace and power of his Spirite. F<y be fayeth, that in beholding the
glory of Chrift we are transformed into the fame Image , as by the
Spinte of God , which furcly fo worketh in vs , that it maketh vs of
one fubftance with God.
6 It were bu t folly to borow of the Philofophers a definitio of the
foulc, of whom almoft none, except Piato,haihperfedly affirmed it
to be an immortall fubftance.In dede fome other aIfo,ihat is the So-
cratians do touch it, but fo as none doth playnly teach that to other,
which himfelfe was not perfwaded, But therefore is Plato of the bet-
ter iudgcmentjbecaufe he doth ip the foule confidcr y image of God.
Some other do fo binde the powers and vermes of the foule to this
prefent life,that being out of the body tbey leaue to it nothing.Now
we haue already taueht by the Scripture,that it is a bodileiTc fubftace:
nowmuftwe addethat although properly it is noc comprehended
in place , yet it is fet in the body , and doth there dwell as in a houfe,
not onely to minifter life to all the partes of the body , and to make
the inftrumentes thereof mete and fittely feruing for the adions that
, they are appoynted for , but alfo to beare the chiefe office in gouer-
ning the life of man,& that not onely about the ductics in this earth-
ly life , but alfo to ftirre vs vp to the feruice of God . Although this
later point in this corruption is not playnely perceiued , yet eucn in
the vices themfelues there remayne emprinted fome leanings therof.
For whenfe commeth it but of fliame , that menne haue fo great care
what be reported of them ? And whenfe commeth Ihame, but of re-
garde of honeftyPWhereof the beginning and caufe is, that they vn«
derflad that they are naturally borne to obferue Iuftice,in which per-
fuafion is enclofed the Cede of religion.For as without all controuerfy
man was made to meditanon of the heaueiy liferfo is it certaync that
the knowledge thereof was engrauen in his foule. And furely mannc
fhould want the principal! vfe of his vnderftanding, if hefhouldbei-
gnorant of his owne felicity, wherof the perfeiftion is that he be ioy-
ncd
God the Creator. Lib.i. 6'j
ncd with God,and therfore it is the chiefc adion of the foul to afpire
therunto. And To the more that euery man ftudieth to approch vnto
Godjthe more he thcrby proueth himfeife to be endued with reafo.
As for the that would haue diuers foules in man, that is,a fcling foul,
& a rcafonable foule, although they feeme to fay fomwhat by rcafon
proueablcjyet becaufe there is no ftedfaft certainety in their reafons,
we muft reieft the,vnlefl£ we hfted to accombre our fehies in thinges
trifling & vnprofitable. A great difagrcment fay they, there is betwen
the inftrumenial motions and the parte ofthe foule endued with rea-
Ibn. As though reafon it felfe did not alfo diflent from it rclfe,& feme
deuifcsof itdoftriue with other fome, as they were armies of ene-
mies. But forafmuch as that troublefomnefle proceedeth of the cor-
ruption of naturc,it were amifle to gather therby,that there are two
fouleSjbecaufe the powers ofthe foule do not agree together,in fuch
well framed order as they ought.But as for more futtle difputation of
the Powers themfelues,! leaue that to the Philofophers. A fimple de-
finition (hall fuffife vs for edification of godlineife . I graunt rhat the
things that they teach arc true, and not only pleafaunt but alfo pro-
fitable to be knowen, & well gathered of them^and I forbid not fuch
as are defirous to learnetoftudy them.Firft therefore I admitte that
there are fiue Senfes , which Plato better hked to call Inftrumentes, Jn^L-.
Whereby all obiedes,are powred into Common fenfe, as into a place ,aeto.
ofreccitc : then followeth Phantafie, whichiudgeththofe thinges
one from other that Common fenfe hath conceiued, next is Keafon,
to which belongcth the vniuerfall iudgcment of thinges : laft , is the
Vnderlbnding minde , which with earneftly bent and quiete vcwing
bcholdeth all thofe thinges , that Reafon is wont to difcourfe vpon,
and confider. And to the Vnderftanding minde, Reafon, and Phan- y^^i^^
fie, which are the three powers ofthe foule , that reft in knowledge, Ethi-
there do anfwere three other that do reft in Appetite , that is to fay, corura
Will , the partes whereof are to couete thofe thinges that the Vn- ^'j ^* *^'
derftanding minde and Reafon do lay before it : the Power of An- jtcm-li
ger, which catchcth thofe thinges that Reafon and Phanfic do mini- 6.cap.3
ftervntoit. The power of Defiring, which taketh holde of thofe
thinges that Phantafie & Senfe^prcfentethit. Although thcfe things
be true, or at leaft hkely to be true, yet becaufe I feare that they (hall
more entangle vs with obfcurentiTe than further vs , I thinke it beft:
to ouerpalTe them. If any man lift otherwifc to diuide the powers of
the foule , and to call the one the power of Appetite,which although
it be without reafon it felfe , yet doth obey reafon , if it be by othec
meane dirc(Sed, and to call the other the power of vndetftanding*
I iij.
Cap.i 5. Of the knowledge of
which IS by it felfe partaker of rcafon , I am not much agaynft it,
neither will I confute this opinion, that there are three beginning*
of doing : that is to fay , Senfe, Vnderftanding, and Appetite. But
Icttevs rather choofe a diuifion , that is within the capacity of all
men , whicii can not be hadde of the Philofophcrs . For they when
they mcpnc to fpeakc moft playncly > do diuide the Ibule into Appc-
Thcmi- tite and Vndeilbnding , but either of thefe they make of two fortes.
nodes Vftderlbnding, thty fay, is fometime Comtemplatiue, which being
j^2 1^** contented wuh onely knowledge, hath no mouing of adion , which
cp. 49, thing Occro thmketh to be exprcfled by this word ingenium, wittc.
Dc du- Somtimc they fay it is pradicall, which by coceiuing of good or euill
plicnn doth diucrflymoue the Will. And appetite they do diuide into Will,
fin b ^"^ ^"^^' ^'^^y ^"^^ '^^^ ^^^" Appetite which they call Horme,
lib.?, obevt th ro reafon,and Luft they call that when the sppetite fhaking
of iht yoke of reafon/unnech out to intemperance. So alwayes they
imagine realon to be that in man, whereby man m:«y rightly goueruc
himfclfe.
7 But we are conftrayned fomwhat to fwarue from this maner of
teaching, becaufc the Philoibplicrs which knew not the corruption
of mans natuie,whichcameforpuniJlimcntof his fJl,do wrongfully
confound the two very diucrfe ftites of man. Lettc vs therefore thus
thinke of if,th.it there are in the foule of man two partes,which (hall
ferue at t'.is time for our prefcnt purpofe,that i: to fay,Vnder{lading
& Will. And let it be the office ofVndcrftandine,todifceine betwenc
pbiedes,or rhinf^s fet before it,ns ech of thtm fhall fccme wortl.y to
be likedor miflekedrand thcofficeofWiU to choofe and follow that
which Vnderflanding fayeth to be good , and to refufe and fl?e that
which VnderftandingfhalldifalowejLcttc vs nothcrebc ftayedatall
with the nice ftittelties of Ariftotle, that the minde hath of it felfc no
mouingjbut rliat it is choifc which moucth it, which choife he calleth
thede(iringe vnderftandinge . Buttp the cnde wcbenot entangled
with fupcrfluous queftjons,lette this fuffife vSjthat the Vndcrftanding
is as it were the guide and gouernour of the (bule,and that Wil hatk
alwayes regarde ro the appoyntment of Vnderfhnding, and abideth
the iudgement thereof in her dcfires. According wherunto,Ariflotlc
F.rWib. htmftl'e hath truely fayd,that fleeing or following is m Appetite (uch
6. cap. i a like thing, as in the vnderttanding minde is affirming and denying.
Now ho we ccrtayne the gouernement of Vndcrftanding is to dire<^
the Will : that we will confider in an other place . Here we meane
onely to Hie w that there can be found no power in the foule but that
may well be fayd to belong to the one of thefe two members. And in
this
ood tne v^reator. Lib.i. eo
this forte vnder Vnderftanding we comprcliende Senfe, which other
do Co diftinguini>that they fay Senfe is endined to pleafurcjfor which
Vnderftanding followerh that which is good:and that Co it commcih
topaffe, that the Appetite of fenfe is Concupifccncc and Luft, the
affcdion of vnderftanding is Will . Againe in fteede of the name of
Appetite, which they better Lke,I fet the name of Wil,which is more
commonly vfcd.
8 God therefore hath furniflicd the foule of man with an vnder-
ftanding minde,wherby he might difcerne good from euilLand right
from wrong, and hauingthe light of reafon going before him,might
fce what is to be followed or forfakcn. For which caufe the Philofo-
phers haue called this dircding parte the Guider.To this he hath ad-
ioyned Will, to which belongeth choife.With thefe noble giftes the
firft ftate of man excelled , fo that he not onely had enough of rea-
fon, vnderftanding, wifdom, and iudgement/or the gone rnement of
this earthly life , but alfo to chme vp euen to God and to eternall fe-
hcity.Theto haue Choife added vnto it,which migh dired the appe-
tites,and order all the inftrumental motions,& that fo the Wil might
be altogether agreeable to the gouernement of reafon . In this Inie-
grity, man had freewill, whereby if he would he might haue attained
etcrnall Ufe.For here it is out of place to moue queftio of the fecretc
prt'deftinatio of God: becaufe we are no t now about to difcufTe what
might haue chaunced or not , but what at that time was the nature
of man. Adam therefore mi^ht haue ftand if he would,becaufe he fell
not but by his owne will . But becaufe his will was phable to either
fide, and there was notgiucn himconftancy to continue, dicrfore he
fo eafely fell. Yet his Ghoife of good & euil w^s free. And not y only^
but alfo in his vnderftanding minde , and in his will was moft great
vprightnefle , and all his inftmmeniall partes orderly framed to obe-
diece,vntill by deftroyinghimfelfehe corrupted the good things that
were in him. From henfe commeth it that all the Philofopbers were
fo blinded, for that in a ruyne they fought for an vpright building,
andforftrong ioyntesin anvnibyntcd ouenhrowc. 7 his principle
they helde, that man could not be a liuing creature, endued with rea-
foDjVnleflc there were in him a free choife of good and euil:and they
con(idcred,that otherwife all the difference (hould be taken awav be-
twene vertuesand vices, vnleflemandid order his owne life by his
owne aduife . Thus farre hadde they fayd well if there hadde bin no
chaunge in man , which chaunge becaufe they knewe not of, it is no
m?ruaile though they confounde heaucn and earth together. But a$
for them which profefllng themfelues to be the .difciples of Clirift,
I iiij.
Cap. 1 6. Or the knowledge ot
do yet feeke for free will in man , that hath bin loft and drowned
in rpiricuall deftrudion , they in goinge meane bctwene the Philofo-
phers opinions and heuenly dodrine arc playnely dcceyued , fo that
they touch neither heauen nor earth . But of thefe thinges we fhall
better fpeake in place fitte for them: now onely this we haue to hold
in mindc, that man at his firft creation was farre other than his pofte-
riry euer iins , which taking their beginning from him being corru-
pted, hath from him receiued an infedion dcriued to them as it were
by inheritaunce . For then all the partes of his foule were framed to
right order, then ftoode fafe the founanefle of his vnderftandinge
mmde , and his will free to choofe the good. If any do obied that le
ftoode but in flippery ftate , becaufe his power was but wcake, I an-
fwere that that ftate was yet luch as fufficed to take from him all ex-
cufe^neirher was it reafonable to rcftrainc God to this point,to make
wan fuch a one as either could not or would not finne at all, 1 graune
Auguft. fuch a nature hadde bin becter, but therefore precifely toquarelv/iih
ene..:. (3q j^.,5 though it hadde bin his duety to haue giuen that vnto m3n,is
8.^ ' ' to much vriiuftfce , forafmuch as it was in his ownc choife to giue
howe much pleafed him . But why he did not vphold him with the
ftrength of ftcdfaft continuance , that refteth hidden in his owne fe-*
Crete councelI:it is our parte oncly to be fo farre wife as with fobriety
we may. Man rcceaued in deede to be able if he would,but he hadde
De cor- ^^^ ^^ ^^^^^ f ^^ might be able. For of this will ihould haue followed
rep. & ftedfaft cotinuance.Yet is he not cxcufsable,vvhicK receiued fo much
grati.ad that of his ownc will he hath wrought his owne deftrudion . And
^* , " there was no necefticy to compell God to giue him any other than a
jj^ ' meane will and a fraylc will,that of mans fall he might gather matter
for his owne glory.
The xvj. Chapter.
That God by hh power doth nourish andmaintaine the vvorld^
which himfelfe hath created^and by his promdenct doth
goiierne all the partes thereof.
Vt it were very fonde and bare to make God a creator for a
moment , which doth nothing fins he hath once made an ende
of his workc . And in this point principally ought we to dift'er
fro the prophane men, that the prefence of the power of God
may fhine vnto vs no IcfTe in the continuall ftate of the world , than
in the firft beginning of it. For though the mindes of the very wicked
in oncly beholding of the heauen and earth arc compelled to rife vp
vnta ihe creator , yet hath fay th a certayne peculiar maner hy it (elfe
whereby
whereby it geucth to God the whole praife of creation. And therfore
feructh that faying of the Apoftlcjwhich we before alleged , that wc
do not vndcrftand but by faith,that the world was made by the word
of God. For vnlefle wc pafle forward eucn vnto his prouidence , we
do not yet rightly concciue what this mcaneth that God is the crea-
tor, how foeucr we do fcemc to comprehende it m minde , and con-
felfe It with tongue. When the fenfc of the flefli hath ones fet before
it the power of God in the very creation,it reflcch there, and when it
procedeth furtheft of all , it doth nothing but wcy and confider the
wifdom,po\vcr,and goodncCfc of the workcma in making fuch a piece
of worke ( which thinges do of them fdues offer and thruft thcra
fclues in light of men whether they will or no)and a certainc generall
doing in prtferumg and gouerning the fame , vpon which depcndeth
the power of mouing . Finally it thinkcth that the liuely force at the
. begmning put into all thinges by God , doth futhfe to fufteine them.
Butfaith ought to pcrcc dcper,that is to (ayjwhom it hath learned to
be the creator of all thinges , byandby to gather that the fame is the
perpctuall gouernor and prefeiuer of them ; and that, not by fiirring
with an vniuerfall motion as well the whole frame of thri woilde , as
all the partes therof,but by fuftcyning,cheri{hing and caring for,with
fingular prouidence cuery one of thofe thinges that he hath created
cue to the leaft fparow.So Dauid after he had (irft faid that the world
was created by God , byandby defcendcth to the continuall courfe of
his prouidence. By the worde of the Lord (faith he) the heauens were pfa. 5 1
ftablu'hed,and all the power therof by the Ipirire of his mouth.By and 64
by he addeth. The Lord looked downe vpon the Tonnes of men, and
fo the reft that he faith further to the fame cflcd . For although they
do not all reafon fo orderly , yet becaufc it were not hkely to be be-
leucd that God had care of mens matters , vnlefTe he were the maker
of the worlde, nor any man docth earncftly bcleue that God made
the worlde , vndeffehe be pcrfwaded that God bath alfo care of his
workes : therfore not without caufe Dauid doth by good order con-
ueye vs from the one to the other. Generally in dedc both the Philo-
fophers do teach, and mens mindes do conceiuc that all partes of the
worlde are quickened with the fecrcteinfpiratio of God. Butyetthey
atteine not fo farre as Dauid both himfelfe procedeth and carrieth all
the godly with him , faying : all thinges wayte vpon thee , that thou ^
mayeftgcuethemfoodeinduefeafon. Thou geueft it to them and j/"*
they gather it. Thou opcneft thy hand and they are filled with good
thinges. But if thou hide thy face they arc troubled. If thou take away
their breath , they die and returnc to their duft. Againc if tho||fendc
v^ap. I o. ur me knowledge or
forth thy Spirite , they are created and thou rcncv/eft the face of the
^^ ^ earth. Yea although they agree to the faying of Paule, that we hauc
8. our being and are moued, and do hue in God,yet are they farre from
that earneft fchng of grace, which he commcndeth vnto vs ; becaufe
they talh not ofGodsfpeciallcare whereby alone his fatherly fauor
is knowen.
a That this difference may the better appeare,it is to be knowen,
that the Prouidcnce of God, fuch as it is taught in the Scripture, is in
comparilbn fct as contrary to fortune and chaunces that happen by
aduenture . Now forafmuch as it hath bin comrhonly beleucd in aiP
ages, and the fame opinion is at this day alfo in a manner in all mcn^
that all thinges happen by fortunejii is certaine,th3t that which ought
to haue bin beleued concerning Prouidcnce,is by that wrong opinion
not onely dlsrkened but alfo in manner buried . If a man light among
iheueSjOr wilde beafles,if by winde fodenly riftn he fulTcr ^ipwrackc
on the fea , if he be kylled with the fall of a houfe or of a tree if an
other wandringin defcrte places linde remedy for his pouertie,ifha«
uing bin toffed with the waues , he atteinc to the haucn , if miracu*
loufly he efcape but a finger bredth from death : all thefe chaunces as
well of profpcritie as of aduerfitie the reafon of the flefli doth afcribc
rat.io. ^® fortune. But whofoeucr is taught by the mouth of Chrift , that all
>. the heares of his hod are numbrcd,wiU fekc for a caufe further of,and
wil'firmely beleue that all chauces arc gouerned by the fccrcte coiifell
of God. And as cocerning thinges v/ichout hfe,this is to be thouglit,
that although euery one of them haue his owne propertie naturally
put into it, yet do they not put forth their power but only fo farre , as
they be dire^ed by die prefent hande of God. They are therfore no-
thing els but inftrumcntes , whereby God continually pourcth in fo
much tffed as pleafeth him , and at his will boweth and lurneth them
to this or that doing. Of no creature is the power more marncllous
or more glorious than of the funne. For befide that ir geueth light to
the whole worlde with his brightnefTc , how great a thing is this that
lie cheriHieih and quickencth all lyuing creatures with his heatcPthat
he breatheth frutefulncflc into tht'earth with his beamcs ? that out of
fcdcs warmed in the bofomeof thegrounde, he drawctha budding
grcneneflTe, and fuftcyningthe fame with new nourifhmetes doth en-
creafe and llrengthen ii,till it rife vp in ftalkes? That he fedcth it with
' continual vapour till it growe to afloure, and from a flourc tofruitc?
That then alfo with baking it he bringcth it to ripenclTc ? That trees
hkewife & vines being warmed by him, do f rft bqdde & fhoote forth
braunchcs , aiid after fendc out a flower, and of a flower do engender
fruct?
vjodtheC^reator. JLib.i. 70
frurc ? But the Lord bccaufe he would claime the whole glory of all
thefes thingcs to himfclfe , made the light firft to be,and the earth to Gen.T. $
be furnilhed with all kindcs of herbes and fruites before that he crea-
ted the funne , A godly man therefore will not make the funne to be
cither a principallor a neceflary caufeof thofc thinges which were
before the creation of the funne , but onely an inftrument which God
y fv th becaufe it fo pleafeth him , wheras he might leaue it and do all
•tjiinges as calily by Iiimfelfe.Thcn whe we reade that the funne ftode jjj(^,^
ihll two daies in one degree at the praier of lofua, & that the (hadow , j.
therof went backe ten degrees for Ezechias his f;»ke, by thofe few mi- 2.Kingj
racles God hath declared that the funne doih not daily forife and **>•"•
go down by blinde inftind of n3ture,but that he to renew the remem-
braunceof his fatherly fauourtowarde vs , doth goucrne ihecourfc
therof Nothing is more naturall than fpring tide to come immcdiatly
afttrwintcr,fommer after fpring,&harueft in courfe after fommer.But
in this orderly courfe is plainly feen fo great and fo vnegall dmcrfitie,
that it may eafily appere that cuery yere, monech and day,is goucrncd
by a new and fpeciall Prouidcnce of God. ^ ^
^ And truely God doth claime and will hauc vs geue vrito him an
almightJneire,not fuch as the Sophifters do imagine , vaine, idle , and
ai it were fleping, but waking, eft'. dualljWoi king and bulied in conti-
nuvill doing. Nor fuch a one as is only a general! beginning ofa con-
fufcd motion , as if he woulde commaunde a riuer to flow by his ap-
pointed chanelsjbut fuch a one as is bent and redy at all his particular
mouinges. For he istheifore called almightie, not becaufe he can do
and yet fittcth ftiU and doth nothing, or by generall inftmCt only ccn-
tmucih the order of nature that he hath before appointed : but be-
caufe he gouerning both heauen and earth , by his l^rouidencc fo or-
dreth all thingcs that nothing chaunceth but by his aduifed purpofe.
For wheras it is faied in the Pfalme that hcdothwhaifocuerhe will, p^ ^^
thcrin is meant his certaine and determined wil.For it were very fonde j,
to expounde the Prophets words after the Philofophers manner, that
God is the fiift Agent or doer , becaufe he is the beginning and caufc
of all mouing : wheras the faithfuU ought rather in adueriitic to cafe
themfelues with this comfort, that they fuffer nothing but by the or-
dinaunceandcommaundementof God, becaufe they are vnderhis
hand.If then the gouernemet of God do fo extende to all his workcs,
it is a very childifli cauillatio to enclofe it within the influence of na- '
ture. And yet they do no more defraude God of his glory than them-
felues of a moft profitable dodrinc , whofocucr do reftraine the Pro-
Didcncc of God within fo narrow boundcs,as if he fuffred all thingcs
Cap.i 6. Of the knovvledge of
to be carried with an vngouerned courfc according to a perpctuall law
of nature . For nothing Avere more miferable than man if he Ihould
be left fubied to euery motion of the heauen , the aire , the earth and
the waters. Befide that by that meane the lingular goodnefle of God
towarde euery man is to much vnhonorably diminiftied.Dauid crieth
>fa.8.3. out that babes yet hanging on their mothers breftes are eloquent
enough to magnifie the glory of God,bccaufe cuen fo fone as they be
come cue of the wombe,they finde food prepared for the by his hc*-
uenly care. This \s in deede generally true , fo that yet our eyes and
fenfts ouerpafle not that vnmarkcd which experiece plainly (hewetb,
that fome mothers haue full and plemifuil breilcs , fome other almoft
dry , as it pleafeth God to iedt one more liberally, and an other more
fcarcely . But they which geue the due praifc to the almightinefle of
God,do receiue double profit cherby,thc one that he hath fufficient-
\y large abilitie to do them good,in v/hoes pofleflion are both heauca
and earth, and to whoes bccke all creatures do attend vpon , to yeld
ihcmfelues to his obedience : the other , tli;it they may fafely rcfte in
his protedion, to whoes will are fubied all thefe hurtfuU thinges thac
may any way be feared , by whoes authorirc as with a bridle Satan^is
reftrained with all his furies and all his preparation , vpon whoes
becke doth hang all that euer is againft our fafetic. And no other way
but this can the immefurable and fuperftitious fearcs be correfted of
appeafed , which we oftentimes conceiue by daungers happening vn-
to vs.SupcrftitioUily fearful I fay we be,if where creatures do threaten
vs or geue vs any caufc of fearc,we be fo afrayed therof,as if they had
of themfclues any force or power to do vs harme , or did vnforefeen
or by chaunce hurt vs , or as if againft the hurtcs that they do , therfc
let 10 were not fufficient helpe in God . As for example. The Prophet for-^
J. ' * biddeth the children of God that they {hould not fearc the ftarres and
fignes of the heauen, as the vnbelcuers are wont to do. He condem-
neth not euery kinde of feare. But when the vnbclcucrs to geue away
the gouemcment of the woilde from God vnto Planets,do faine that
their felicitie or miferie doth hang on the decrees and foreHicwinges
of the ftarres, and not on the will of God , fo commeth it topaffe
that their feare is wiihdrawen away from that onely one , whom they
ought to haue regarded, vnto the ftarres and comets. Whofo therforc
will beware of this vnfaithfulnefte , let him kepc alwayes in remem-
brauncc that there is not in the creatures a wandring power, working
or motioUjbutthat they are gouerned by the fecrete counfeil of God,
fothat nothing can chaunce but that which is decreed by him both
witting and willing it fo to be.
4 Firft
God the Creator. Lib.i. 7 1
4 Firft thcrfore let the readers learnc,that Prouidencc is called that,
hot whcrwith God idlely bekoideth from heauen what is done in the
worlde, but wherwith as guiding the ftcrne he (itteth and ordreth ail
thinges that come to pafTe . So doth it no lefl'e belong to his handes
than to his eyes. For When Abraham faicd vmo his fonne. God (hall Gc a>*
prouide, he meant not onely that God did forknow the fuccefle then 8.
to come, but that he did caft the care ofa thing to him vnknowcn
vpon tlie will of God , which is wont to bring thinges doutefull and
confufcd to a ccrtainc end. Wherby foloweth that Prouidencc confi-
fteth in doing: for to much fondely do many trifle in talking of bare
forknowledge. Their error is not altogither fo groflfe which geue vn-
to God a gouernemcnt but difordered , and without aduifed choifc,
(as I haue before faid, ) that is to fay fuch as whirleth and driueth a*
bout with a generall motio the frame of the world with all the partes
therof, but doth net peculiarly dired the doing ofeueryjcreaturc.Yec
is this error not tolerable. For as they teach, it may be (notwithftan-
ding this Prouidencc which they call vniucrfall)that all creatures may
be moued by chaunce jor man may turnc himfclfe hether or thcthec
by free choife of his will. And fo do they parte the gouernemcnt be-
twene God and man, that God by his power infpireth into ma a mo«
tion wherby he may workc according to the nature planted in him,
and man ordcreth his ownc doingcs by hfs owne voluntaric aduife:
Briefely they mcane that the worlde , mens matters , and men them-
felues are gouerned by the power, but not by theappointemcntof
God. I fpeake not of the Epicureans (which peftilece the worlde hath
alway bin filled with) which dreame of an idle and flouthfull God:and
other as mad as they , which in olde time imagined that God did Co
rule aboue the middle region of the ayre , that he left thinges beneth
to Fortuneifor againft fo euidct madneflc the dummc creatures them-
felues do fufficiently crie out. For now my purpofe is to confute that
opinion that is in a manner commonly beleued^which giuing to God ^
a certaine blinde,and I wote not what vncertaine motion,taketh from
him the principall thing, that is by his incomprehcnfible wifdom to
dired and difpofe all thinges to their ende:and fo in name onely and
not in deedc it makeih God a ruler oif the worlde , bccaufe it taketh
from him the gouernement of it. For what (I befech youj is it els to
gouernejbut fo to be oucr them that are vnder thee,that thou mayeft
rule the by appointed order? Yet do I not altogether reied that which
is fpoken of die vniuerfall Prouidence.-fo that they will againe graunt
me this,thai the world is ruled by God.not onely becaufe he maintei-
neth the order of nature whicli himfelic hath let, but alfo becaufe he
Cap. 1 6. Of the knowledge of
bach a peculiar care ofcueryone of his workes . Trew itistliat all
fortes of thinges are moued by a fecret inftind of nature , as if the/
did obey the eiernall commaundemenc of God , and that that which
God hath ones determined doth of it felfe precede forwarde , And
hereunto may that be apphed which Chnft faiethj that he and his fa-
ther were euen from the beginning alway working . And that which
Aft.17. Pauleteacheth thatinhim wcliue, are moued and haue our beyng,
3 8. and that which the author of the Epittle to the Hebrues , meaning to
Heb.1.3 prone the Godhead of Chrift laieth, that by his mightie comaunde-
ment ail thinges are fufteyned. But they do wrong which by this co-
lour do hide and darken the fpecial Prouidcnce,which is cofirm'ed by
(o certaine and plaine tcftimonies of Scripture , that it is maruell tiiat
any man coulde doute of it. And furely they thcmfelues that drawc
the fame veile which I fpeakc of to hide it , are compelled by way of
corredion to zddc , that many thinges arc done by the peculiar care
oF God , but then they do wrongfully reftraine the fame onely to pe-
culiar doin£;es.Wherfore we muft proue that God doth fo geue hedc
to thegouernementofthefucceiresof allthinges, and that they all
do fo procede from his determined counfcU tnat nothing happencth
by chauncc.
5 If we graunt that the beginning of motion belongeth to God,
but that all thinges are cither of themfelues or by chaucc caried whe-
ther the mclination of nature driucth them,the mutuall fucceding by
turnes of daies and nightes , of winter and fommer , fhalbe the workc
of God, mfomuch as he appointing to euery one their duties hath fct
ihcm a certaine law , that is if they fhoulde alway kepe one meafurc
in egall proportion, as well the dayes that come after the nightes , the
moncthes after monethcs,and yercs after yercs. But when lomctimc
immoderate heatcs with drincffe do burne vp all the graine,fomtimc
vnfeafonablc raines do marrc the corne, whe fodeine harme cometh
by haile and tempeftes : that fhall not be the worke of God , vnlelTe
parhap it be becaufe the cloudes or faire whether or coulde or heste
hauetheir beginning of the meting of the planetesor other naturall
caufcs. But by this meane is there no roume left, neither for the fa-
therly fauour nor for the iudgemcntes of God . If they fay that God
is bencficiall enough to mankindc becaufe he poureth into the heauc
and earth an ordinarie power, wherby they do finde him nouriOimec:
that is to vaine & prophane an inuention,as though the frutefulnefle
of one yearc were not thefingularbleflingofGod , and dearth and'
famine were not his curfe and vcngeauncc? But becaufe it were 10 log
to gather together all the reafons that feruc for this purpofe , let the
autho-
God the Creator. Lib.i. 72
auihoritic of God himfelfe luffice vs.Tn the law and in the Prophctcs
he doth ofcentimes pronounce , that fo ofte as he waiereth the earth
with deaw and raine,he declareth his fauor, and that when by his c6-
maundemcnt the hcauen is hardened hke yron, when corne is confu-
med with blading and other harmes,when the ficldes are ftriken with
haile & tempelksjit is a token of his ccrtainc & fpeciall vcngeaunce.
If we graunc thefe thinges , then is it afTurcd that there falleth not a
drop of mine but by the certaine commaundement of God . Dauid p^^ ^ -
prayfeth the general Prouidence of God,thac he gcueth meate to the ^/
rauens birdes that call vpon him : but when God himfelfe threatneth
famine to lyuing creatures, doth he not fufficicntly declare that he
fedeth all Uuing thinges fometime with (carce & fometime with more
plentifull portion as he thinketh good ? It is a childifh thing as I faid
before,to rcftiaine this to particular doinges, whcras Chrift fpeaketh *^^^
without.exception , that not a fparrow of neuer fo fmall a price doth
fall to the grounde without the will of his father. Surely if the flying
of birdes be ruled by the purpofe of God , then muft we nedes con-
fcfle withy Prophctjthat he fodwelleth on hie, that yet he humbleth Pfa.ia,
himfelfe to loke vpon all thinges that chaunce in heauen and earth. 5<
6 But becaufc we know that the worldc was made principally for
mankindes fake,we muft therfore cofider this endc in the gouernancc
of man. The prophet Hieremie cricth out. I know, Lorde , that the Hier.t o
way ofman is not his owne, neither bclongethit toman todiredhis 23.
ownc fteppcs. And Salomon faieth , the fteppes of man are ruled by ^^°'^^
tbe Lord, and how (hall a man difpofe his owne way ? Now let them '*'
fay that man is moucd by God according to the inclination of his
owne nature, but that man himfelfe doth turne that mouing whether
it pleafcth him . Butif that were truely faid, then flioulde man haue
the free choife of his owne wayes. Paraduenture they will deny that,
becaufc he can do nothing without the power of God. But fcing it is
certaine that the Prophet and Salomon do geue vnto God , not one-
ly power but alfo choife and appointment , they can not fo elcape a-
way. But Salomon in an other place doth finely rebuke this raflic-
nelfe of men, that appoint vnto themfelucsan other ende without
refpedof God, as though they were not led by his hande. The pre- p^.^ ^^
parations (faith he) of the harte are in man, but the aunfwere of tbc i,
tongue is of the Lord. It is a fonde madncffe that men will take vpon
them to do thinges without God , which can not fo much as fpeakc
but what he will . And the Scripture to exprefle more plnincly that
nothing at all is done in the worldc but by his appointment , flieweth
that thofe thinges whiche Icme moUe happening by chaunce arc
Cap.i^. Qf the knowledge of
Bxo.21. fubied to him . For what can you more afcnbe to chauncc , than
• 3 • when a broken bowe falhng from a tree killcth a wayfaring man psf-
fing by it ? But the Lord:faith farre othcrwife, which confeffeth that he
hath dehuered him into the hand of the flaierXikevvife who doth not
leaue the happening of lettes to the bhndnefle of fortune ? But the
Lord fuffcreth it not which claimcth the judgement of them to him-
felfe : for he faieth that it cometh not to pafTe by a mans owne power
Pro. i6. ^^'^^^ ftones are caft into the lap and drawen out againe , but that thing
I J. which onely might de faied to come of chaunce he teftiHeth to come
from him felfe. For the fame purpofe makeih thar faying of Salomon.
The poore man and the vfurer mete together , God lighteneth both
their eyes. For although poore men & richc be mingled together in
the worlde, while euery one hath his ftate affigned hmi from God, he
admoniiheth that God which geueth light to all men is not blinde,&
fo he exhortcth the poore to pacience , becaufc whofoeuer are not
contented with tlieir owne ftate, they feke to (hake of the burden that
God hath laied vpon thcm.So an other Prophet rebuketh the vngod-
ly men, which afcribe to the diligece of men or to Fortunejthat fome
lie in miferie and fome arifc vp to honor . To come to preferment is
neither from the eaft nor from the weft nor from the fouth , for God
Pf^75' is theiudge, hemakethlowandhemakcthhic. Becaufc God can not
7* put of the office of a iudgc, therupon the Prophet proueth that by his
fecret purpofe fome are in honor,& other fome rcmaine in c5tempt.
7 And alfo I fay that the very particular fuccefles arc generally
Exo.ip. witneffcs of gods fingular prouidece.God raifed in the defert a foutji
» J winde to bring the people plenty of foules : when his pleafure was to
Ion. I . }^3yg lonas throvven into the fea,he fent out a winde to raife vp a tem-
pefte. But they that thinke that God gouerneth not the worlde , will
fay that this chaunced befide commo vfe. But therby I do gather that
ncuer any winde doth rife or encrefe but by the fpecial commaundc-
mcnc of God , For otherwife it fhoulde not be true , that he maketh
Pfa.104 the windes his meflangers, and fiery flame his miniftcrs, that he ma-
4' keth the cloudes his chariots and rideth vpo the winges of the winde,
vnUfte he did by his will driue aboute the cloudes and windes , and
fhew in them the lingular prefcncc of his power. So in an other place
Pfa-ioy we arc taught that Co ofrc the fea fwelleth with blaft of windes , thofe
*)• violences do teftifie a lingular prefcnce of God. He commaudeth and
raifeth vp the ftormy windes and it lifteth vp the waues therof,and the
he turneth the ftorme to calme,fo that the waues therof are ftill. As
in an other place he faicth,that he fcourged the people with burning
windes.So wheras the power of engendring is naturally geuen to men,
yet
ijrod tne v^reator. l,id.i. 7}
yet God willeth it to be imputed to his fpeciall grace,that heleaueth
ibme in barrennell'e , and vouchfaueih to graunt ilTue to other fome,
the frute of the wombc is his gift. Therfore faid lacob to his wifcjam Gc ja
I as God that I can geue ihee children ? But to make an ende : there »•
is nothing more ordinary in nature than that we be fed with bread.
But the Holy ghoft pronounceth that not onely the growing of the
fruites of the earth is the fpeciall gift of God , but alfo that men liuc
not by oncly bread, becaufe it is not the very full feding thatnou-
rifhethjbut the fccret blcfilngof God : as on the other fide he thiete- g^ ^
neth tljathe wil breake the Iby of brcad.Neither coulde we earneflly
pray for our dayly bread , vnlcfle God did geue vs foodc with his fa-
therly handc. Therfore the Prophet , to perfwade the faithfull , that
God in feding them doth fulfil the office of a good father of houfe- Pf3.i jtf
holdcjdoth put them in minde that he geucth meate to all flefh.FinaU
ly when wc haue on the one fide *. The eyes of the Lord are vpon the
righteous, and his eares bent to their prayers : on the other fide : The pfa. 5-
cyeof the Lord is vpon the vn godly to deftroy the memory of them t6>ij.
ou: of the carthdet vs know that all creatures both aboue and beneih
are ready to obedience that he may apply them to what vfc foeuer he
will, wherupon is gathered that not onely his generall prouidence rc-
maineth in his creatures to continue the order of nature , but alfo by
his maruellous counfell is applied to a certaine and proper ende.
8 They which would bring this dodrine in hatred, do cauill that
this is the learning that the Stoikes teach of fatum or Deftcnic,which
alfo was ones laied for reproch to Auguftine. As for vs, although we ^^ib. a.
be loth to ftriue about wordes,yet we allow not this word fatum,both *^ "
becaufe it is one of thofc whoes prophane noueltie S. Paul leacheth "***"**
vs to flie,and becaufe fome men go about with the odioufnefle therof
to bring Gods truth in hatred. As for the very opinion ofthe Stoikes,
it is wrongfully laid to our charge. For we do not, as the Stoikes do,
imagine a neccfliiie by a certaine perpetuall knot and entangled order
of caufes which is conteined in nature : but we make God the iudge
and gouernour of all thinges , which according to his wifdom hath
cuen from furtheft ende of ctemitie decreed what he woulde do,
and now by his power putteth in execution that which he hath de-
creed. Wherupon we affirme that not only the heauen and earth and
other creatures without life , but atfo the purpofes and willes of men
are fo gouerned by his Prouidece, that they be diredly caried to the
ende that it appointeth. What then ? will one fay, doth nothing hap-
pen by fortune or by chaunce ? I aunfwere that Bafihus magnus harh
cruely faid that fortune and chauoce are heathen mens wordes , with
K
v^ap.i t, ^i tne Knovvieage or
the (ignjfication wlierofthe mindes of the godly ought not to be oc-
cupied. For if euery goodfuccefTe be the blefllngofGod,and cucry
calamiticand adueificie be his curfe,now is there in metis matters no
place left for fortune or chaunce . Wc ought alfo to be moucd with
^ctr. li ^^^'^ faying of Auguftine.In his boks againft the Acadcmikes he faith,
ucap.i. It doth difpleafe me that I haue fopft named fortunc,albeit my mea-
ning was not to haue any goddeife meant therbyjbut cnly a chaucea-
ble happening in outward ihinges ether good or euil.Oi which word
Fortune are deriued thofe wordes which no rch^ion forbiddeth vs to
vfe , forte, forfan, forfitan, fortafle,fortuito, that is parhap,par2duen'
ture, by fortune and by chaunce, which yet muft all be applied to the
Prouidence of God . And that did I not leaue vnfpoken when I faid,
for parchaunce eue the fame thatis commonly called Fortune is aifo
ruled by fecret order. And wee call chaunce in thinges nothing els but
that wherof the reafon and caufe is vnknowen. I faid this in dcdc, but
it repenteth me ih^t I did there fb name Fortune . Forafmuch as 1 fe
that men haue a very euill cuttome, that where they ought to fay,thus
it pleafed God, they fay,thus it plcafed fortune. Finally he doth com-
monly in \\\s bookes teach, that the world {hould be vnorderly whir-
led about if any thing were lefte vnto Fortune . And although in an
other place he determineth that all things are done partly by the free
will of man, and partly by the Prouidence of God, yet doth he a httle
after fufficiently (hew that men are fubied vnto and ruled by Proui-
dence, taking this for a principle, that nothing is more againft conue-
nience of reafon, than to fay that any thing chaunceth but by the or-
dinance of God , for els itflioulde happen without caufe or order by
which reafon he alfo excludcththat happening that hangeth vpo the
will of men : and byandby after he plainlier faieth that wc ought not
Quseft. to feke a caufe of the will of God. And fo ofte as he maketh mention
lib. 85. Qf fufTerauncCjhow that is to be vndeiftandcd fhall very well appeare
jV ^^' by one place where he proucth that the will of God is'the foueraigne
cap.4! ^^^ ^"^ft caufe of all thinges, becaufe nothing happeneth but by his
commaundement or fufferaunce « Surely he faineth not God to fit
fttll idle in a watch tour , when it is his pleafure to fuffer any thing,
wheras he vfeth an aduall will ( as I may fo call it ) which otherwife
coulde not be called a caufe.
9 But forafmuch as the dullnefle of our vnderftanding can not by
3 great way atteine to the height of Gods prouidece,we muft vfe a di-
ftindio to helpe roll ft it vp. I fay therfore,hovv focuer all thinges are
o deincd by the purpofe and certaine difpofitionof God , yet to vs
ihcy are chaunfable,not that we thmke that fortune ruleih the world
and
God the Creator. Lib.i. 74
and men, and vnaduifcdly u (Tcrh all thinges vp and downe ( for fuch
bcaftlynefle ought to be farre from a Chnftian hartc)biit bccaufe the
order, meanc, cnde and necefTuie of thofe chingcs that liappen , doth
for the moft parte lie fccrete m the purpofe of God , and is not com-
prehended with opinion of man, therfore thofc thinges are as ir were
chau(able,which yet it is certaine to come to pnlTe by the will ot Gcd.
For they feme no othcrwife, whether we coniider them in their owne
nature, or whether we eftceme iht m according to our knowledge and
iudgemcttt. As for an example , let vs put the cafe> thatamarchaunt
being entrcd into a wood in copanie of true men, doth vnvvifely Ihay
away from his felowes , and m his wandring chaunccth vpon a dennc
ofrobbers, lighcerh among theues and is kiiled,hisdcath was nor on-
ly forcfcen with goddes eye , but alfo determined by his decree. For j
it IS not faied that he did foiefce how farre ech mans life iliould cx-
tende , but that he hath (ettc and appointed markes which can n^-t be
pafled. And yet fo farre as the capacitie of our mmde conceiuerh, ail
thinges herein fune happening by chaunce. What fliall a Chriilian
here thinke ? eucn this,whatfoeuer happened in fuch a death , he will
thinke it in nature chauncing by fortune as it is in dede,buc yet he wil
not doubt that theprouidenceof God did gouerne to dired fortune
to her cnde. In hkc manner arc the happeninges of thinges to come.
For as all thinges that be to come arc vncertaine vnto vs , fo we hang
them in fufpcnfe, as if they might fall on either parte, yet this remai-
neth fettled in our har£es,that nothing fhal happe but chat which God
hath already forefeen. In this meaning is the name of chaunce oft se-
pered in Ecclefiaftes, becaufe at the firft fight me do not atteine to fee
the Hift caufe which is farre hidden from them. And yet that which is
declared in the Scriptures concerning the fecret prouidencc of God,
was neucr fo blotted out of the hartes of men , but that eucn in the
darkenefle there alway rtiincd fome fparkes therof. So the forhiayeis
of the Philiflias,although they wauer in doutfulne(re,yet they aicribe
aduerfitie partly to God partly to fortune. If ( fay they ) the arke go -
that way,we fhall know that it is God that hath ftrikcn vs : but if it go g,^,
the other way, then a chauce hath light vpon vs In dedc they did foo-
lillily , when their conning of fothfaying decerned them, to flee to for-
tuncjbutin the meane while we fe them conftrained, fothat they dare
not thinke that the euil happe which chaijced vnto them did come of
fortune. But how God with the bridle of his prouidence turneth all
fucceflcs whether pleafeth him,m3y appcarc by one notable example.
Beholdecuenatonemomenrof lime, when Dauid was foundcour & ^ ^^^
nere taken in the dcfert of Mahon, eucn then the Pliiliftmes inuaded aj. 16,
K 1).
am.
9*
Cap. 17. Ut the knowledge or
the lande,and Saul was compelled to depart. If God meaning to pro-
uide for the fafetie of his feruaunt did caft this let in Sauies way,fure-
ly although the Philiftines going to armes were fodein and befidc the
expedation of men,yct may wc not fay that it came by chaunce. But
thofe things that feme to vs to happen by chaunce/aith'wil acknow-
ledge to haue bin a fecret mouing of God. I graunt there doth not al-
waic appeare the like icafon, but vndoutedly we ought to beleue that
whatfoeiier changes of thinges are fecn in the worlde , they come by
the fecret fturring of the hand of God.But that which God purpofcih
is Co of nccefljtie to come to paffe, that yet it is not of nectflide pre-
cifcly nor by the nature of it felfe. Astherof isa familiar example
in the bones of Chrift. Forafmuch as he had put on a bodie like vnto
ours], no wife man will deny that his bones were naturally able to be
broken, yet was it impoffible that they fhould be broken : wherby wc
fee againe that not without caufe were in fcholes inuented the diftin-
dions of neceiTitie in refped , and neceffitic abfolute , of confequent
and confequencCjwherc as God had fubie<5l to bricklenefle the bones
of his fonnc , which he had exempted from being able to be broken,
and fo brought to neccflitie by reafon of his owne purpofe , that that
thing couldc not be,which naturally might haue bin.
The xvij. Chapter.
VVherto and to what ende this doHrine is to be appliedy that we way h»
certaine of the profile therof.
NO w forafmuch as mcs wits arc bent to vainc curious futtlc-
ties, it is fcarcely poflible but that they (hall encombre the-
felues with entangled doubtes , whofoeuer do not know the
true and right vfe of this Dodrine. Thcrfore it Ihall be ex-
pedient here to touch fhortly to what ende the Scripture teacheth,
that all thinges are ordred by God. And firfl of all is to be noted,that
the Prouidence of God ought to be confidercd as well for the time
to come as for the time paft :fecondanly that the fame is in fuch forte
the goucrnour of all thinges , that fometime it woorketh by meanes,
fometime without meanes , and fometime againft all meanes. Laft of
all, that it rendeth to this ende, that God may {hew that he hath care
of all mankinde, but fpecially that he dothwatchein ruling of his
Churchjwhich he vouchefaueth more nerely to looke vnio. And this
is alfo to be added,that although cither the fatherly fauour & bounty-
fulnelTe of God,or oftetimes the feueritie of his iudgemet do bright-
ly apperc in the whole courfe of his Prouidence : yet fometime the
cauies of thofc thinges that happen are fccrete, fo that this thought
crcpeth
God the Creator. Lib.i. 75
crcpcthinto ourmindes, that mens matters arc turned and whirled
about with the bhnde fway of fortune , or Co that the flefh ftirreth vs
to murmure , as if God did to make him felfe paftimccofiTe men hke
tennifc balles . True it is that if wc were with quiet and ftill mindes
ready to learne, the very fuccefle it (clfe wouldc at length plainely
flicw, that God hath an aflfured good reafon of his purpofe , either to
traine them that be his to pacience , or to cferred their euill affedions
and tame their wantonneffe , or to bring them downe to the renoun-
cing of them felueSjOr to awake their diowfinefle : on the other fide
to ouerthrowthe prowde,to difappoint ihcTuttleiie of the wickcd^to
confounde their deuifes. But howfocuer the caufes be fecrete and vn-
knowen to vs;we muft affuredly holde that rhey are laid vp in hidden
ftore with him, and therefore wc ought to crie out with Dauid,God, Pfa. 40,
thou haft made thy wonderfull workes fo many , that none can count
in order to thee thy thoughts towarde vs. I woulde declare and fpeakc
of them, but they are more than 1 am able to exprefle. For although
alwaies in our miferies we ought to thinke vpo our finnes,that y very
punifhement may mouc vs to repentance , yet do we fee how Chrift
geuerh more power to the fecret purpofe of his father, than to punifh
euery one according to his deferuing. For of him that was borne lohn.^.
blinde he faith ; neither hath this man finned nor his parentes,but that
the glorie of God may be {hewed in him.For here naturall fenfe mur-
murcth v/hen calamitie commeth euen before birth , as if God did
vnmercifully fo to punifh the fely innocente, that had notdeferued it.
But Chrift doth teftifie that in this looking glaflfe the glory of his fa-
ther doth fhine to our fight, if we haue cleerc eyes to beholde it. But
we muft kepe raodeftie , that we draw not God to yelde caufe of his
doinges , but let vs fo reuei ence his fecret iudgementes , that his will
be vnto vs, a moft iufte caufe of all ihinges. When thicke doudes do
couer the heauen, and a violent tempeft arifcth , then by caufe both a
heauyfome miftynefle is caft before our cyes,& the thunder iroublcth
our eares , and all our fenfcs are amafed with terrour, we thinke that
all thinges are confouded and tombled togethenand yet all the while
there remaineth in the heauen the fame quietenefte and calmencflc,
that was before. So muft we thinke that while the troublefome ftate
of thinges in the worlde taketh from vs abilitie to iudge, God by the
pure light of his righteoufnefte and wifdom,doth in well fi amed or-
der gouerne and difpofe euen thofc very troublefome motions them*
felues to a right ende. And furcly very monftrous is the rage of many
in this behalfe, which dare more boldly call the workes of God to ac*
compt ^ exatnine his fccrec mcaningcs, and to geue vnaduifed fen-
K iij.
Cap. 17. Of the knowledge of
ttncc or "thinges vnknowen , than they will do ot the deecJes of mor-
t.illmen. For what is more vnorderly than to vfc fuch modcftie to-
wardc our egals , rhac we had rather fufpende our iudgemcnt than to
incurrechebl.mKof rafhentfre, and on the other fide proudely to
triumph vpon the darkciudgementes of God , which it became vs to
regardc with reueronce.
z Therfore no man (h?H well and profitably wcy the Prouidencc
of God but he that confidtring that he hath to do with his creator
and the maker of the world,dorh with fuch humihty as he ought fub-
mit himfelie to feare and- reucrence. Hereby it cometh to pafle, that
fo many dogs at this day do with vcnimed biringeSjOr at leaft barking
afiaile this dodrincj becaufe they will haue no more to be lawfull for
God, than their ownc reafon informeth them . And alfo they raile at
vs v^ith all the fpitcfulnefle that they are able , for that not contented
with the comaundementes of the law,vvhcrin the will of God is com-
prehended, we do further fay , that the worlde is ruled by his fecret
counfels. As though the thing that wc teach were aninuencionofour
Ovvne braynejand as though it were not true that the holy Ghoft doth
cilery where exprtflely fay the rame,and rcpetcth it with innumerable
formes of fpeech.Biit bccaufe fome fliame reftraineth rhem^jthat they
dare not vomite out their bbfpemies againft the heaucn : they fainc
that they contcnde with vSjto the endc they may the more freely play
the madmen . But if they do not gratmt that what locuer happeneth
in the worlde, is goucrned by the incomprehenfible purpofc of God,
let them aunfwcre to what ende the Scrip:ure faith , that his iudge-
mentes are a depe bottomlcfle deapth. For where as Mofcs crieth out
that the will of God is not to he fought afarre of in the cloudes , or in
the deapthes , becaufe it is familiarly fct forth in the law : it foloweth,
that his other hidden will is compared ro a bottomlelfe deapth.Of ihe
which Paule alfo faith : O deapth of the richeflc and of the wifdom
and of the knowledge of Goddiow vnfearchable are his iudgemcntes,
and his waies pad finding out ? for who hath knowcn the mindc of
the Lord, or who hath bin his counfellour ? And it is in deede true,
that in the Gofpelland in the law are contcined mifteries which are
farre abouc the capacitie of our fen[c : but forafmuch as God for the
comprehcding of thefe mifteries which he hath vouchefaued to open
by his Wiiorde , doth lighten the mindes of them that be his , with the
Spirite of Vnderftanding : nowe is therin no bottomlelfe deapth, but
a way wherin we muft fafe walke, and a candell to guide our feetc,and
the light of life , and the fchoole of certaine and plainly difccrnablc
trucih. But his meruailous oidcr of gouerning the worlde is worthily
called
God the Creator. Lib.i. ^6
called a bottomlelle deaptli : becaufe while it is hidden from vs , wc
ought leuercntlytoworfliippeit. Right well hath Moles exprcfTed
thembothinfewewoordes. The fecret thinges (faiethhe) belong Dcu. 2 j>
to the Loide our God : but the thinges reueled belong to vs artd to ^^.
our children for euer. We fee how he biddcth vs not onely to ftudie
in meditation of the law,but alfo reuerently to looke vp vnto the fe-
cret Prouidence of God. And in the booke of lob is reherfedone
title of this deapch, that it humbleth our mindes . For after that the ^ ^
author of that booke in fuiueying vp and downe the frame of the
worlde, had honourably entreated of the wooifces of God , at length
he addeth : Lo , thefe be part of his waies , but howe littel a portion^
heare we of him ? According to which reafon in an other place he
maketh difference betwcne the wifedomthat remaineth wjth God,
and the meafure of wifdom that he hath appointed for men. For after '
lie hath preached ofthe fecretes of nature , he (aieth that wifdom 1$
knowen to God onely, and is hidden from the eyes of all liuyng crea- lob 2S,
tures. But byandby after he faieth further , that it is pubhllied to the « 2.
ende it (hould be ferched out, becaufe it is faid vnto ma, behoide the
feare of God is wifdom. For this purpofc maketh the faying of Augu- Lib.8 j.
ftine : Bycaufe wc know not all thinges which God doth concernmg quzii.
vs in moft good order, that therfore in only good will we do according cap. 23.
to the law, becaufe his Prouidence is an vnchaungeable law . There-
fore (ith God doth claime vnto him fclfe the power to rule the world,
which is to vs vnknowcnjlet this be to vs a law of fobrenefle and mo-
deftie, quietly to obey his foucreigne authoritie , that his wjU may be
to vs the only rule of iutticc, and the moft luft caufe of all thinces. I
meane not that abfolute will , of which the Sophifters do babble, fe-
pararing by wicked and prophane difagrement his iufticc from his
power , but I meane that Prouidence , which is the gouerhefle of all
thinges,from which procedeth nothing but right : although the cau-
fes therof be hidden from vs.
5 Whofoeuer fhalbe framed to this modeftie , they neither for
the time pafte will murmure againft God for their aduerlities , nor lay
vpon him the blame of wicked doinges, as Aganxmnon in Homer
did, faying , I am not the caufe , but lupiter and Deftenic : nor yet a-
gaine as caried awaie with Deftenies, they will by defperation throw
them fclues into deftruftion , as that yong man in Platitus which faid:
Vnftable is the chaunce of thinges : the Deftenies driue men at their
pleafure , I will get me to fbme rocke there to make an ende of my
goodes and life together. Neither yet (as an other did) they will pre-
tcndc the name of God to coucr their owne mifcheuous doinge» ;for
K iiij.
Cap.i7. Of the knowledge of
fo Tauh Lyconides in an other comedie: God was the moucr. Ibe«
leuc it was rhe will of the gods : for if it had not bin their will, I know
it Ihoulde not fo come co paffe. But rather they will fcarch and learnc
ou: of the Scripture what pleafeth God , that by the guiding of the
Holy ghoft they may trauaile to atteine therunto . And alfo being
ready to folowe God, whether foeucr he calleth,they (hewe in dede
that nothing is more profitable then the knowledge of his dodrinc.
Very fooliflily do prophane men turmoile with their fondnefles , fo
that they in maner confound heauen & earth together as the faying
is : Tf God haue marked the point of our death, we can not efcape it:
then it is lat)our vainely loft in taking hede to our felues. Therefore
where as one man dareth not venture to go the way that he hearetb
to be daungerous, Icaft he be murthcred of theues : an other fendeth
for Pliifitians,and wcriedi himfelfe with medicines to fuccour his life:
an other foibcareth grofTe meatcs for feare of appeiring his feble
health : an other dreadeth to dwell in a ruinous houk : Finally where
as men deuife all waies & cndeuour with all diligence of minde whcr-
by they may atteine that which they delire : either all thefe remedies
are vaine, which arc fought, as to reforme the will of God , or ds hfe
and death, health and Iickencff.', peace and v/arre, and other thinges,
which men as they couet or hate them, do by their tratiaile endeuoac
to obteine or efcape, are not determined by his certaine decree. And
further they gather, that the praiers of the faithfull are (lifordercd.or
at the leaft fuperfluous , wherin petition is made that it will picafe the
Loi'dto prouide for thofe thinges which he hath already decreed d 6
etcrnitie. To be fhort,they deftroy all counfels that men do take for
time to come as thinges againft the Prouidence of God , which hath
derejimined what he would haue done, without calling them to coun-
fell. And the what foeuer is already happened,they fo impute it to the
Prouidence of God, that they winke at the man whom they know to
haue done it. As hath a ruffian (lalnc an boneft citczen ? he hath exe-
cuted ( fay they ) the purpofe of God . Hath one ftolen , or com-
mitted fornication? becaufe he hath doen the thing that was for-
fcene and ordeined by the Lord , he is a minifter of his Prouidence.
Hith the fonne carcle{rely,negleding al remcdies,waited for the death
of his father ? he coulde not refift God that had fo before appointed
from eternitie . So all mifcheuous doinges they call vertues becaufe
th y obey the ordinance of God.
4 B ut as touching thinges to come , Salomon doth well bring in
agrement together the purpofcs of men with the Prouidecc of God.
For as he laughcth to fcorne their folly, which boidcly do cntcrprifc
any
God the Creator. Lib.i. 77
any thing without the Lorde , as though they were not ruled by his
hand:fo in an other place he fpeaketh in this maner.The hart of man
purpofeth his waVjbut the Lord doth dired his fteppes,meaning that PfO'^-5
we are not hindered by the eternall Decrees of God , but that vnder
his will we may both prouide for our felueSjand difpofe ail things be-
longing to vs. And that is not without a manifeft reafon. For he that
hath limitted our life within appointed boundes,hath therwithall left
with vs the care thereof, hath furniflied vs with meanes and helpes
to preferuc it,hath made vs to haue knowledge before hand of daun-
gers , and that they fhould not opprefle vs vnware , he haih giuen v$
prouifions and remedies . Now it is playne to fee what is our duety:
that is to fay : If God hath committed to vs our owne life to defcndc,
our duety is to defende it . If he offer vs helpes , our duety is to vfe
them . If he fhcw vsdaungers before,our duety is not to runne rafh-
ly into them . If he minilter vs remedies , our duety is not to neglcA
them, Butnodaungerfliallhurtjvnlefrcitbefatall, which by all re-
medies can not be ouercome . But what if daungers be therefore not
fataljbecaufeCod hath affigned thee remedies to repulfe & ouercome
them ? See howe thy manner of reafoning agreeth with the order of
Gods difpolicion . Thou gathertft thatdaunger is not to be taken
heede ofjbecaufe forafmuch as it is not fatalljwe fliall efcape it with-
out taking heede at all : but the Lord doth therefore enioync thee to
take heede of it, becaufehewill nothiueic fatall vnto thee . Thefc
maddcmendo nor confider that which is playne before th^jr eyes,
that the skil cf taking counfell & heede is enfpired into men by God,
whercb) they may lerue his Prouidence in prcferuing of their owne
life:ason ihe other fide by negligence & flouth they procure to them
felucs thofe cuils that he hath appointed for them.For how commeth
it to paffe , that a circumfped man while he prouideth for himfelfe,
doth winde himfelfe out of euils that hang ouer him , and the foolc
perifheth by vnaduifed rafhnefle , but for that both folly and wifdom
are the inftrumcntes of Gods difpofition on both partes ? There-
fore it plcafed God to hide firom vs all thinges to come , to this endc
that we Hiould meete with them as thinges doutefuU , and not ceaflc
to fcttc prepared remedies agaynft them , till either they be ouer-
come or be paft all hclpe of care . And for this caufe I haue before
admonifhed that the Prouidence of God doth not alway iheweit
fclfe nakcd,but as God by vfing of meanes doth in a certayne maner
cloth it.
^l The fame men do vnorderly & vnaduifedly draw the chaunccs
of time paft to the naked prouidence of God . For becaufe vpon
Cap. 17. ' Of the knowledge of
it do hang all thingcswhatfoeucr happen, thtrf ore (fay tliey) neith6fr
robberies, nor adulteries , nor manflaughters arc committed without
the will of God. Why then (fay they) lliall a thiefe be puniflied, foe
that he fpoylcd him whom the Lordes will was to punifh with pouer-
ty ? Why (hall the murtherer be punillied which hath flayne him
whofe life the Lorde had ended ? Ifallfuchmendo ferue the willof
God, why rtiall they be punillicd ? But f deny that they ferue the will
of God . For we may not fay that he which is caiied with an euill
minde doth feruice to God as commaunder of it , where in deede he-
doth but obey his owne wicked luft . He obeyeth God , which being
enformed of his will doth labour to that end , whereunto Gods will
callcth him.But whcrby arc we enformed of his will,but by his word?
Therefore in doinge of thinges we muft ke that fame will of God,
which he declareth in his word.God requireth of vs only that which
he commaundeth . If we do any thing agaynft his commaundement,
it is not obedience but oblhnacy & tranfgrtlTio.But vnl fie he would,
wc fhould not do it.I graunt. But Ho we euill thinges to this end to o-
bey him ? But he doth not commaund vs to do them , but rather wc
I'unne on headlong, not minding v/hathe willethj but fo raging with
the intemperance of our owne lull, that offct purpcfe we bende our
trauaile againft him. And by thefe mcanes in euill doing we ferue his
iuft oidinance.becaufe according to the infinite i^reatnefle of his wif-
dom,he hath good skill co vfe euill inftrumenres to do good. And fee
how foolilh is their maner of arguing. They would haue y doers vn-
punifhed for m.ifcheiious aftes, becaufe they are not comittcd but by
the difpofition of God.I graunt moreithat thceues and murtherets &
other euill doers are the inftruments of Gods Prouidencc, whom the
Lord doth vie to execute thofe iudgementcs which he hath with him
fclfe determined. But I deny that their euill doings ought to haue a—
ny excufc iherby.For why?nial they cither enragle God in the fame
wickcdneffe with them,or lliall they couer iheir naughtines with his
righteoufnefle^Thcy can do neither of both. Becaufe they fliould not
be able to excufe them(elues , they are accufed by theyr owne confci-
cncc. And becaufe they fliould not be able to blame God, they finde
all the euill in themfelues,& in him nothing but a lawfull vfe of their
cuilncfle.But he worketh by them. And whence I pray you.commeth
the ftinke in a dead carrion , which hath bin both rotted & difclofed
by heate of the funne ? All men do fee that it is raifed by the beames
of the funne. Yet no man doth therefore fay , that the funbcames do
ftmke.So when there reftcth in an euill man,thc matter and giltincffe
of euill, what caufc is there why it fiiould be thought that God is any
thing
God the Creator. Lib.i. 78
thing defiled with it,if he vfe their feruicc at his pleafure. Away ther-
£ore with this doggilh frowardncfTcjwhich may in dede a far of barkc
at the iuftice of God, but can not touch it.
6 But thefe cauillations or rather doting crrours of phrcnetike
tnenjfhali cafily be Ihaken away,by godly and holy meditation of the
Prouidence, which the rule of godlinefle reacheth vs, fo that thereof
may grow vnto vs a good and moft pleafant fruite.Therefore a Chri-
ftian hart when it is moft afluredly perfuadedjthat all things come to
pafle by the difpofitionof God , and that nothingehappencth by
chaunce,will alway bend his eyes to him as to the principall caufe of
things, and yet will confider the inferiour caufes in their place.Then
he will not dout that the fingular prouidence of God doth watch for
his pr^feruation , which Piouidence will fuffer nothing to happen,
but that wliich fhall turne to his good and faiuation. And becaufe he
hath to do firft of all with men, and then vyith the other creatures,he
will allure himfelfe that Gods Prouidence doth reignein both. As
touching men , whether they be good or euiU , he will acknowledge
that all their counfcllcs, wiiies, enterprifcs and powers are vnder the
hand of God, fo that it is in Gods will to bow them whether he lift,
and CO rcftrayne ihcm fo oft as plcafeth him. That the fingular Pro-
uidence oc God doth kepe watch for the fafety of the fjithiull, there
are many and moft euident promifes to witneHe.Caft thy burde vpon p^ .
the Lord, and he ihall nouriih ihee,and ih:A\ not fufter the righteous ^ j
to rallfoL-euer,bccaufehecaretJiforvs.He thatdwellcthin rhehelpe i.Pcc.j.
of the hieft, ihall abide in the proredionof the Godofheauen. He 9-
that toucheth you,toucheih y apple of mine eie.I will be thy fliield, ''• ^ ^*
a brafen wall : I will be enemy to thy enemies. Although the mother z^c.j.S
forget her childre,yet will 1 not forget thee. And alfo this is the prin- tia, 26.
cipall entent in the hiftories of the Bible,to teach that the Lord doth 2.
with fuch diligence keepe the wayes of the Saintes, that they do not
fo much as ftumble againft a ftonc.Therfore asa htle before we hauc
rightfully rcieftcd their opinion which do imagine an vniuerfall
Prouidence of God 5 thatftoupeth not fpccially to the care of euery
creatureiyet principally it Ihal be good to rcknowlcdge the fame fpe-
ciall care toward our felues. Whereupon Chrift after he had affirmed Mat.io.
that not the fparow of ieaft value,doth fall to the ground without the 2i>.
will of the Father,doth byandby apply it to this ende,that we ftiould
confider that howe much we be more worth than fparrowes , with
fo much nyer care doth God prouide for vs , and he extendeth that
care fo farre that we may be bold to truft that the heares of our head
arc numbred. What can we wilh our felues more, if not lb much,as a
Cap. 17, Of the knowledge of
hcare can fall from our head but by his will ? i fpcake not only of all
fhankinde , but becaufe God hath chofen his church for a dwcUingc
houfe for hinifclfe, it is no doutc but that he doth by tingular exaples
(hew his care in goucrning oFit.
7 The feruaunt of God being ftrengthened with thefe both, pro-
inifes & examples, will ioyne with them the teftimonies which teach
that all men arcvnder Gods power, whether ic be towinne their
inindes to good will, ortoreftrayne their malice that it may do no
hurt . For it is the Lord that giueth vs fauour not onely with them"*
xo. I . that will vs well, but alfo in the ifEgy ptians, and as for the maliciouf^
!• nefle of our ennemies , he knowcth how by diuerfe wayes to fubdue
it.For fometime he takcth away their wit from themjfo that ihey can
concciue no found or fober aduire,l;ke as he fent foorth Sathan to fili
Kines ^hemouthesof all the Prophees with lyin^ todeceiue Achab. He
J. ji. made Rechabeam madde by the yong mens counkll , that he might
Kings be fpoyled of his kingdome by his owne folly . Many times when he
i.io. grauntcth them wit, yet lie mrjkcch them fo afraid & aftonilhed, that
they can not will or go about chat which they hiue conceiued.Som- -
time alfo when he hath fuffered them to go about that which luft &
rage did counfcll them , hedoiliin coautnienttimc breake of their
violences,& fuffercth them not to proceede to the end that they pur-
pofed. So did he before the time bring to nought the cbunfell of A-
.Sam. cbitophell that fhould hauebintoDauidsdeftrudion. So alfo he ta-
7-7' keihcarcto gouerneall his creatures for the bcnefiteand fafetyof
ob.t. f j^gp^ t|-,3t be his,yea and to gouerne the deuill himfelfejwhich as wc
feedutft enterprife nothing againft lob without his fuflfcraunce and
comaundement.Of this knowledge neceflarily enfueth both a thank-
fulncjfife of minde in profperous fuccefle of thinges , and alfo patience
in aduerfity , and an incredible afifurednefle againft the time to come.
Whatfoeuer therefore fliall betide vnto him profperoufly and accor-
ding to his hartes defirc , all that he will afcribe vnto God , whether
he feele the bounty of God by the miniftery of men,or be holpen by
liuekfTc creatures.For thus he will thinke in his mindetSurely it is the
Lord which haihenclincd theirmindestome, which h.^th ioyned
them vnto me to be inftrumentes of his goodnefle toward me , In
plenty of the frutes of the earth,thus he wil thinke,that it is the Lord
which heareth the heauen , that the heauen may heare the carth> that
the earth alfo may heare her fruites . In other thinges he will not
dout that it is the onely bleffing of the Lord, whereby all things pro-
fper , and being put in minde by fo maay caufeshc will not abide to
be vnthankefuli.
S If
God the Creator. Lib. i . yp
8 If any aduerliiy happen , he will byandby therein alfo lift vp hi«
minde to God, whole hand auaylcth much to emprint in vs a paciecc
and quietc moderation of hart.If lofeph had ftill continued in recor- Gen. 45
ding the falfehode of his brethren,hc could neuer haue taken a bro- ^'
therly minde toward them . But becaufe he bowed his mindc to the
Lordjhe forgate thciniurie,andincIintdto mekenefle and clemency,
fo farrefoorch that of his owne accord he comforted his brethren &
fayd:It is not you that fould me into -^gy pt , but by i he will of God
I was fent before you to faue your hues . You in dcedc thought eusll
of me.but the Lord turned it to good. If lobhadhadrefpedtothe , .
Chaldces , by whom he was troubled ^ he woulde forwith bane bin
kindled to reuenge. But becaufe he did therewithal! acknowledge it to
be the worke of God,he comforted himfelfe with this moft excellent
faying:Thc Lord hath giucn, the Lord hath taken away , the Lordes
name be blelled. So Dauid : when Scmci had railed and call ftones at 2.Sa.i^
him,if he had looked vpon man, he would haue incouraged his foul- ^^
diers to reacquire the iniury . But becaufe he vnderftoode that Semci
did it not without the mouing of theLord,he rather appeafed thcrn.
Let him alone(faid he)for the Lord haih commaunded him to curfe.
With the fame bridle in an other place doih he reftrainc the intempe-
rance of forow.I held my peacc(fayth he)and became as domme,be- pfal. 7$,
caule thou O Lord , diddeft it . If there be more effeduall remedy a- 10.
gainft wrath & impatience : furely he hath ngt a little profited which
hath learned in this behalfe to ihinke vpon the Prouidence of God,
that he may alway call backe his minde to this poynt. It is the Lords
will, therefore it muft be fufFered, not onely becaufe it is not lawfull
to ftriue againft itjbut alfo becaufe he willeth nothing but that which
is both iuft & expedient. In fumme this is the end,that being wrong-
fully hurt by men,we leaning their malice ( which would do nothing
but enforce our forow,and whet our mindes to reucnge)fhoulde re-
member to climbe vp vnto God , and learne to beleue aflurcdly, that
whatfoeucr our enemy hath mifchicuouflydone againft vs,w3S both
fufFcred and fent Iff Gods difpofiiion.Paule,to refraine vs from reco-
penfing of iniunes doth wifely putte vs in minde , that we arc not to ^P"-**
Wraftlc with fiefti and bloud , but with the fpirituali enemy the deuill, * *
thatwe may prepare our felucs to ftriue with him.But this is the moft
profitable leflbn for the appeafing of all rages of wrath , that God
doth arme as well the deuil as all wicked men ro ftriue with vs,& that
he fitteth as iudge to cxercife our patience . But if the misfortunes &
miferies that opprcfle vs, do chaunce without the worke of men, let • ** * '
vs rcmcber the do^rinc of the la\y:whatfoeuer is profpcrous flowctli
Cap, 17* Of the knowledge of
from thefounrayneof Gods ble(ling,anri that alUduerfitics arc his
cui fings:and let that moft terrible warning make vs afraydrif ye waike
ftubbornly againft me , 1 will alfo walke ftubbornly againft you . In
which is rebuked our fluggifhneire, when according to the common
fenle of the flefli accompting all to be but chaunce thac happcneth,of
both fortes we are neither encouraged by the bencHtes of God to
worfhip him, nor pricked forwarde with his fcourges^iO' repentaunce.
|. This fameis the reafojwhy Hiercmy & Amos did fo fliarply rebuke y
leweSjbecaufe they thought that things as wel good as euili came to
mo. J. pg£-g without y comaundemeni of God.To the fame purpofe feructh
Efa. 45. tbat fermon of Efay. I the God that create light & falhion daikenfle,
6, that make peace and create euil. I God do make all thefe things.
^ And yet in the meane time a godly man wiH not winke at the
infcriour caufes. Neither will he,becaufe he thinketh them the mini-
fters of Gods goodnes by whom he hath rcceiucd benefite,therefore
let the paffc vnconfidered, as though they had deferued no thake by
their getlenefFe:but he wiUhartily thinke himfelfc bound vntothem,
& will willingly confefle his bond, & trauail as he Ihallbe able and as
occafion Ihal ferue,to recompence it. Finally in benefites receiued be
will reuerence and prayfe God as the principall author , but he will
honor men as the miniiters , & as the trueth is in dedc he will vnder-
ftand that he is by the will of God bound to them , by whofe hand it
was Gods will to be beq^ficiall vnto him.If he fuffer any lofl'e by ne-
gligence or want of fore(ight,he will determine in his minde that the
(ame was done in dcde with the will of Godjbut he will impute it alia
to himfelfe . It any man be dead by fickeneffe whom he hath negli-
gently handledjwheras of du€ty he (houldhaue taken good hede vn-
to him although he be not ignoraunt that the man was come to his
apointed time beyond which he could not palfe^yct wil he not ther-
by leflen his offenfe, but becaufe he had not faitlifully difcharged his
duety toward him , he will fo take it as if he had perished by fault of
his negligence.Much lefle when there is vfed any fraudf,and concei-
ued malice of minde in committing either murthe%or theft , will he
excufe It vnder pretence of Gods Prouidencc,but he will in one fclfc
cuiUadfeuerally behold both therighteouinefTe ofGod Scthcwic-
kcdnes of ma,as both doth manifeftly ihew thefelues.But principally
in things to come he wil haue connderation of fuch inferiour caufes.
For he will recken ir among the bleffings of God if he be not difap-
pomtedofrhe helpesofmen which h€ may vfe for his fafety. And fo
he neither will be neeligent in takinc; of counfelhnor flouthfutl in era-
uing their helpc whom he fecth to haue fufficient whcrof he may be
fuccoured:
God the Creator. • Lib.i . 80
fuccoured'.but thinking that whaifoeucr creatures can any thing pro-
fit him,the fame are offered into his hand by God^he will apply them
to his vfc as the lawful inftrumets of Gods Prouidencc. And becaufe
he doth not certainly know what fucceflc the bulines will haue that
he goeth about, ( fauing that in all things he knoweth that the Lord
will prouide for his benefic)he will with lludy rrauaile to y which he
fliall thinke expedient for himfelfe, fo far as he can coceiue in mindc
& vnderftanding. And yet in taking of counfels he will not be caned
on by his ownc wit, but willcomit & yeld himfelfe to the wifdom of
Godjthat by the guiding therof he may be diredcd to the right end.
But his confidence fhall not fo ftay vpon outward helpes , that if he
haue the he will careltfly reft vpon them, or if he want them he will
be afraid as left deftitutcfor he will haue his minde alway fattened v-
pon the Prouidence of God,neirher will he fuffer himfelfe to be dra-
wcn away from the ftedfaft beholding therof.by cofideration of pre-
fcnt things. So though loab acknowledged that y fuccefleof battaiU
is in the wil & hand of God,yet he gaue not himfelfe to flouthfulncs
but did diligently execute that which belonged to his calling, but he
leaueth it vnto y Lord to gouernc the cnd.We wil ftand valiant(faith ^ j^^^
he J for our nario,& for the cities of our God.But the Lord do what is lo.ia.
good in his eyes. This knowledge fhal defpoile v$ of raflmes & wrog-
ful cofidence,& ihall driue vs to continuall caUing vpon God; & alfo
fhal vphold our mindes with good hopc,fo aj we may not dout afl'u-
rcdly and boldly to defpifc thofe daungers that compafle vs about.
10 In this point doth theineftimable felicity of a godly mindc
fliewe foorth it fclfe. Innumerable are the euiis that do befcege mans
life,& do threare him fo many deathes. Asjnot to go further than our
feliiesrforafmuch as our body isareceptacle of a thoufad difeafessyca
hath enclofed & doth nourifh within it the caufesof difeafesjman can
not cary himfelfe but he muft need es alfo cary about with him ma-
ny formes of his owne deilrudion , and draw foorth a hfe as it were
entangled with death. For what may it elfe be called,wbere he neither
is cold,norfweateth without perillPNow whetherfocuer thouturnc
thce,al things y are about thee are not only vntrufty friendes to thee,
but do in maner openly threaten & feme to fhew thee prefcnt death.
Go into a fhip,there is but a fote thicknes becwene thee & death. Sic
on horfebacke in the flipping of one foote thy life is in daunger. Go
through the ftretes of the city:eue how many tyles are vpon y houfes
10 fo many perils art thou fubied. If there be an iron tole in thy hand
or thy friendes , the harme is ready prepared. Howe many wild bea-
ftes thou fecft, they arc all armed to thy delUudion . If thou meanc
Cap. 17. O t the knowledge of
. to (huttc vp thy felfc > euen in a garden well fcnlcd,wherc may apeare
nothing but pleafauntncfTe of ayrc and ground , there fometime lur-
keth a Serpent . The houfe which is continually fubied to fitr doth
in the day time threaten thee with pouerty, & in the night time with
falling vpon thy head .Thy fecld foralmuch as it lyeih open to hayle,
froft, drowth and other tempeftcs it warneth the of barrennefl'e, and
thereby famme . I fpeakc not of prifonninges, treafons,robbcrieSjO-
pen violence , of which parte do befcege vsathome, and parte do
follow vs abroade . In thefe ftreightes muft not man necdes be moft
miferable, which euen in life halfe dead doth painfully draw foorth 2
careful! and fainting bteath as if he had a fwearde continually hang-
ing ouer his necke . But thou wilt fay that thefe thinges chaunce fel-
dom, or at the leaft not alwayes, nor to all men,and neuer all at ones,.
I graunt, but feeing we arc put in rninde by y examples of other, that
the fame things may happen to our felues , and that our life ought of
ducty no more to be free than theirs, it can not be but that we muft
dred and fearc them as things that may light vpon vs.Now what can
a man imagine more miferable than fuch a fearefulneflfc ? Be fide that,
it is not without difhonorable reproch of God to fayjthat he hath fet
open man the nobleft of all his creatures to their blindc and vnad-
uifed ftrokes of fortune.But here my purpofe is to fpeakc only of the
mifcry of man, which he (hould feele if he fliould be brought fubicift
vnder fortunes dominion.
1 1 But when that light of Gods Prouidence hath ones fhined vpo
a godly man : he is now releued and deliuered not only from the ex-
treme anguirti and feare wherewith he was before opprefledjbut alfo
from all care. For as iuftly he fcareth for tune, fo he dare boldly com-
mitte himfelfe to God. Thisis(I fayjhis comfort, to vnderftand that
the heauenly father doth fo hold in allthinges with his power, fo ru-
Icth them with his authority and countenance, fo ordreth them with
his wifdomjthat nothing befalicth but by his apointment:andthathe
is receiucd into Gods tuition , and committed to the charge of An-
gcl$,and can not be touched with any hurt of water,nor ficr, nor w^-
pon, but fo farre as it ftiall pleafe God the gouernour to giue them
place. For fo is it fong in the Pfalme.For he (lial deliuer thee from the
hunters fnare,and from the noyfom pcftilencc. He wil couer thee vn-
der his winges,and thou flialt be fure vnder his fethers.His trueth flial
be thy fhield and buckler.Thou flialt not be afraid of the fearc of the
night, nor of the arrow that flyeth by day , nor of the peftilence that
walk'cth in the darkenefle , nor of the plage that dcftroyeth at none
day. And fro thcnfc proecdcth that boldnefle of the Saintcs to glory:
The
The Lord is my helper,! will not feare what flclh may do to mc.l he PC 1 1 8.
Lord is my protc6or,why fliall I be afraidi* If whole campes ibnd vp <5«
againft me,if I walke in the nuddcllof the (liadow of death,! will not
ccafe to hope well. Whence, I pray you, haue they this that their af-
furedncfle is ncuer fliakc away from theei^Jut hereby, that where tlic
world fcmcth in fhew to be without order whirled about, they know
that God workethcuery where, whole workc they truft fhalbc for
their prefcruation. Now if their fatcty be aflailcd either by the deuill
or by wicked men, in that cafe if they were not ftrengthened with re-
membrance & meditation of Piouidence,they muft necdcs byandby
bedifcouragcd. But when they call to mmde , that the deuiU and all
the route of the wicked , are fo euery way holden in by the hand of
God as with a bridle, that they can neither conceiue any mifcliicfc a-
gainft vs,nor go about it when they haue conceiucd it,nor if they go
neuer fo much about it,can ftirre one finger to bring it to pafTc but fo
far as he fliall fufter.yea fo far as he fliall commaunde,& thatrhey arc
not only holde faft bound with fetters, but alfo compelled with bridle
to do fcruice;hcre haue they aboudantly whervvith to comfort them-
fclues . For as it is the Lordes workc to arme their fury and to turnc
& dired it whether it pleafeth him , fo is it his worke al(b to appoint
a meafure and end,ihat they do not after their ownc will licentioufly
rriumphe.With which perfwafion Paiile being ftabli{hcd,did by the ,.Thp, j
fufterance of God appoint his iourney in an other place which he faid 1 8.
was in one place hindered by Satan.If he had oncly fayd that he had «.Cor,
binftoppedby Satan, hefliould haue fcemed to giue him to much '^^
power,as if it had bin in Satans hande to oucrthrow the very purpofcs
of God:but when he makethGod the iudge,vpon whofc fufiTerauncc
all iourneyes do hangrhc doth thcrwirhail fhew , that Satan whatfoe-
uer he go about , can attaine nothing but by Gods will. For the fame
rcafon doth Dauid becaufe for the fundry chaunges wherewith mans
lifeis tolTcd and as it were whiilcd about,he doth fleejto this {andua-
ry,fayeth that his times are in the hande of God. He might haue faid Pfal.ji,
cither v courfe of his life,or time in the fingular number . But by the '*.
woid Times, he meant to exprefie that howfoeuer the ftate of man be
Ynftedriaft, whatfbeuer alterations do nowe and then happen,ihcy arc
gouerned by God. For which caufe Rafin & the kingofjfracll, when £r«.8.4»
ioyning their powers to the deftrudion of luda , they fecmcd as ficr-
brands kindeled to waft and confumc the land,are called by the Pro-
phctc fmokinge brandcs , which can do nothingc but breath out a
litle fmoke. So when Pharao was terrible to all men by reafon of his
ntheiTe, ftrength and number of men , he himfclfc is compared to a
L
Exctji.
Cap.17. Of the knowledge of
bc<ilt of the Sea,and his army to filhcs. 7 herttore God fayth that he
Will cake the Captainc and die army with his hooke and draw them
whither he lift. Finally becaufeit wjU not tary long vpon this point, if
a man marke it he fhall ealily fee that the extremity of all miferies is
the ignorauncc of Godr0^miidence,and the chiefe blefredncifc ftan»
deth m the knowledge thereof.
xz Concerning liie Prouidence of God , this that is fayd wtrc c-
nough for fo much as is profitable both foi the perfed learning and
comfort of the fiiihfuH , ( for to fill the vainc curiofity of men, no-
thing can be fufficienr,neither is it to be wiihcd that they be fatisfied)-
were ic not for certaine places, which feme to meane ocherwife than
is aboue declarcd,that God hath not a ftedfaft and ftable purpofe buc
Ce.6.6. chaungeable accordmgto the difpoficion of infcriour thinges.Firft,in
I. Sam. fome places is fpoken of the repentance of God , as that he repented
I '^'^^A J. him ofthe creating of man,of the aduancing of Saul to the kingdom.
And that he will repent him of the euill that he had determined ro
lay vpon his people , fo foonc as he perceiueth any conuerfio ofthe,
Agame there are rehearfed diucrie repelles of his decrees . He had
Ion. 3.4 declared by lonas to the Nmiuites that after 4a. day es onccpaft Ni-
niuc fhould be defiroyed , but byandby lie was turned with their re-
pcntauncc to a more gentle fenience. He had by the mouth of Efay
Efa pronounced-death to Ezechias, which he was moucd by his tearcs &
?• S* prayers to djfFcrre.Heruppn many do make argument^that God hath
a.Kjng. not appointed mens matters by eternali decrccbut ycarely,daily and
^°'^' hourely dccreeth this or that , as euery mans dcferuings are,or as he
thinkith it equity and iuftice . Concerning his repentaunee this we
ought to hold , that the fame can no more be in God, than ignorance
crrour and weakenelTe. For if no man do wittingly & willingly throw
himfelfc into the cafe that he nede to rcpet,we can not fay that God
doth repent, but chat we muft alfo fay,rhat God is ignorant what will
come to paflTejOr that he can not auoide itjor that he headlong & vn-
aduifedly runneth into a purpofe whcrof he byandby forthinketh him.
But that is fo far fro the meaning ofthe holy Ghoft , thntin the very
mentio making of repentance he denieth that God had any repeming
at all, becaufe he is not a man that may repent. And it is to be noted
that in v fame chapter they ar^ both lb ioyned together, that the c6-
parifon doth very well bring the fiiew of repugnancy to agreement.
His changing is figurariuely fpoken , that God repented that he had
I.Sam, made Saul kine^byandby aker it is added.Thc ftrengih of Ifraell ftiall
i>.*^' notlye,nor flialbe moued with repenting. Becaufe he is not a man
that he may repent . In which wcudes his vnchangcablencfle is affir-
med
God the Creator. Lib. i . 82
mcd plainly without any fii;urc. Thcrforc it is ccrcaine that the oidi-
nauncc of God in difpofing ihc matters of n)cn,is perpetuall & abouc
all repemance.And that his conftance fl^.ould not be doutfull,his very js/u. a j.
dlduerH^ries hauc bin copelled to beare him witncs.F or Balaam whe- i^.
ther he would or no , could not choofe but burft out into this faying:
that he is not like a man to lye: nor as a fonne of man to be changed,
& that it is not pollible that he ihould not do that he hath fayd , and
not fuliill whatfocuer he hath (poken.
1 5 What meaneth then this name of Repcmaunce ? cucn in the
fame fort that all the other phrafcs of fpeach which do defcribe God
vnto vs after the mancr of mcn.Forjbecaufe our wtakcncfle doth not
reach to his hieneire,that defcription of him which it taught vs, was
mecte to be framed lowe to our capacity that we might vnderftandc
it . And this is the manner how to frame it low for vs , to paint out
himfelfc not fuch a one as he is in himfelfc , but fuch a one as he is
perceiued of vs. Where as he himfelfe is without al mouing of a trou-
oltd mindcjhc yet tef>ifieththat he is angry with finners-Likeas ther-
fore when we hearc that God is angry^we ought not to imagine that
there is any mouing at all in him,but rather to eoiider that this fpech
is borowed of our comon fcnfe, becaufe God bearcth a rc<cn;bbncc
of one chafed and angry (b oft a5 be exercifeth iud^cment : fo ought
we to vnderftand nothing elfe by this word of Repentance but a cl a-
gingof deedcs, becau'fe men by changing of their decdes are wont-co
declare that they miflike them.Becaiife then euery chagc among mtn
is an atncndement of that which mifliketh them, & amendeiueni co-
me th of repentance : therefore by the name of repentance is meant
that , that God chaungeth in his workes.ln the meane time yet nei-
ther is his purpofe nor his will turned,nor his afftdion changed, but
he folowcth on with one continual courfc that which he bad from e-
tcrnity forcfeene,allowed & dccreed^howfoeuer the alteration feeme • "
Ibdcn intheeyesofmen. A^
14 Neither doth the holy hiftory (hew that Gods decrees were re-'
pellcd when it (lieweth that the deftrudion was pardoned to the Ni- Ten.).
niuites which had bin before pionounced,& that the life of Ezechias »"•
was prolonged after warning giucn him of death . They that fo con- ^'*'5^i
ftrueit are decerned invnderftanding of threteningsrwhich although
they do fimply affirme,yet by y fucceflc it ilialbe perceiued that they^
contayncd a fecrct condition in them.For why did God (end lonas to
thcNiniuites to tell them aforehandeof the ruine of their citv? Why
did he by : fay gitie Ezechias warning of death ? For he might hauc
brought to nought both him and them without fending them any
Cap. 1 8. Of theknowledgc of
Word of their deftrudion.He meant thcrfore an other thing,than to
make them by foreknowing of their death to fee it comming a (At
of . Euen this he meantrnot to haue ihc deftroyed,but to haue them
anieded that they Oiould not be deftroycd. Therefore this that Jonas
■ proph<:ciedthat Niniue Ihould fall after 40. dayes , was done to this
end that it ihould not fall . That hope of longer life was cut of from
EzechiaSjWas done for this purpofe that he might obtaine longer hfc.
Now who doth not fee that Godmeant by Inch threatningesioa-
wake them to repcntauncc , whom he made afrayd to the ende that
, they might efcape the iudgement which they had deferucd by ihcyr
finncs? If that be fo agrecd,thc nature of the things themfclues doth
lead vs CO thiSjto vnderttand in the fimple threatening a fecrcte em*
jc. j^. plied condition, which is alfo confirmed by like examples. The Lord
*• rebuking the king Abimelech for that he had taken away Abrahams
wife from him,vleth thefe wordcs. Behold thou (halt die for the wo-
man that thou haft taken/or {he hath a hujband.Bui after he had ex-
cufed himfelfe , God fayd thus . Reftore the wife to her husband,for
he is a Prophete and Ihall pray for thee that thou maicft hue . If noc:
know that thou {halt die the death and all that thou haft. You fee hovr
in his firftfentence he vehemently ftriketh his minde to bring him to
be more hedefully bent to make amcnds,& in the other doth plainly
declare to him his will. Seing the meaning of other places is like : do
not gather of thefe that there was any thing withdrawefrom the firft
purpofe of God , by this that he made void the thing which he had
before pioncuced-For God doth prepare the way for his eternal or-
dinaunce, when m giuing warning of the puniflimct he moueih thofc
to repentance whom his wil is to fpare,rather than varieth any thing
in his will , no not in his word,fauing that he doth not expreffe the
fame thing in (lUables which it is yet cafie to vnderftad. For that fay-
5ra. 1 4. *"? of iil^iy n^uft needes remayne true ; The Lord of Hoftes hath de«
ij, termined,nnd who fhall be able to vndo it? His hand is ih'etched outj
and who Ihall turne it away? ,
T
The xviij. Chapter.
That God. dothfo vft the feruirt of wicked men, and fo bovveth thtir
mmdti to put hisiudgetnents in exenttion^lhat yet fttU
himfelfe renjayneth pure from all fpot.
Here ari feth a hard queftio out of other places, where it is faid
that God boweih anci draweth at his will,Saran himfelfe & all
the reprobate . For the (tn(t of the flefh fcarcely conceiueth
how he working by the,{hould not gather fome (pot of their
fdulr.
God the Creator, Lib,i. 85
Yault, yea in his common working be Tree from all fault, & iuflly c6- *
demne his minifters.Vponthis was deuifed y diftindio bctwene Do-
ing & SufFtring: becaufe many haue thought tiiis dout vnpofiibic to
be difibluedtthat both Satan and all the wicked are fo vndci the hand
& powerof God,that he diredtth their malice vnto what end ir plca-
fcth him, & vfeth their wicked doings to the executing of his iudge-
incntes.And their modefty were peraducnturc cxcufable, whom the
(hew of abfurdiiy putteth in feare,if it were not fo that they do wrog-
folly with a lying defenfe go about to deliuer the iuftice of God fro ^
all vnrightfuli blame. It femeth to the vnrcafonablcrhat man f]iou!d
by the will & commaundemet of God be made blindc, & fo by.^ndby
be punifhed for his blindnefle . Therefore ihey fcke to fcapt by this
fhift ) that this is done by the fufFerancc , but not by the wii! of God,
But he himfelfc plainly pronouncing that he doth it, doth rcied thnc
fhift. As for this that me do nothing but by the fccrctcomaundemenc
of God, & do trouble themfelues in vaine with deliberating, vnles he
do by his fecret diredion ftablifh that which l^.e hath before dctcrmi-
nedjit is proued by innumerable and plaine teftimonies.lt is ctrcaync
that this which we before alleged out of the Plalme , that God doth
all things that he will, belongeth to all the doings of men. If God be
the certaine appointer of war & peace,as it is there faydj^ tiiat with-
out exception: who dare fay that men are caried csufelefiTely w hlir.de
motion while God knoweth not of it,& (itteth ftill?Br.t in ipecinl cx-»
amples will bemorehghtfom plainnes.By thefirft cii.'^pier of 'oh we
know, that Satan doth no lefle apperc before God to receiue his ( 5-
maundementes than do the Angels which do willinply obey.In dcde
it is after a diuers maner & for a diuers end, but yet fo that heca not
go about any ihinge but with the will of God. Although there feemc
afterward to be added a bare fofferace of him to afflid the holy man:
yet becaufe that faying is true : The Lord hath giucn , the Lord hath j^j, , ^
taken away, asitpleafedGod fo isitcome to paflc. We gather that
God was the author of that triall of lob, wherof Satan & the wicked
thecues wereminifters. Satan gocth about todriue the holy man by
defperaiion to madnes. The Sabees cruelly & wickedly do inuadc 8c
rob his goods that were none of theirs.Iob knowledgeth that he was
by God ftripped of all his goods and made poore, becaufe it fo plea-
fed God. Therefore whatfoeucr men or Satan himfelfe attempt , yet
God holderh the fterne to turne all their trauailes to the executing of
his iudgements. It was Gods will to haue the falfe king Achab decei- ... .
ued: : the deuill offered his feruice thereunto: he was fenr with a cer. ^ ^.^q,
tayne commaundcmcnt , to be a lying fpirite in the mouth of all the
L iij.
Cap. 1 8. ' Of the knowledge of
Prophets. If the blinding and madnes of Achab be the iudgcmenlof
God , (hen the deuife of bare SutFerancc is vainc . For it were a fond
thing ro fay , that the iudge doch only fuffcr and not alfo decree whac
he will haue donc,and corniDaunde the minifters to put it in executio*
3t was the lewes purpofe to dcftroy Chriii , Pilate and the fouldiers
.„ do follow their rau.ing luft , andyetinaibiemnc praycrthedifciplcf
J j* * do confeifc , that all the wic-ked men did nothing elfe but that which
/ a.x. the hand and counfell of God had dctermined:euen as Peter had bc-
2 5 • fore preachedjthat Chrift was by the decreed purpofe and foreknow*
^^'^' IcdgcofGoddeliucrcd to beflayne. Asif he (houldfay : thatGod
j.Sa 1 6. f^'O^ whom nothing is h/dden from the beginninge did wittingly an4
aa. wilhngiy appoint that which the lewesdid execute, as in an other
place he rehearfeth, y God which fhcwcd before by all his Prophets
a.Sa.ij. that Chrift Hiould fuffer, hathfo fulfilled it. Abfolon defiling his fa^
^ ^' thers bed with inceftuous adultery, committed deteftable wickedncs.
Yet God pronounccth that this was his owne worke. For the wordei
arc thefc. Thou haft done it fecreilyjbutl will do it openly,andbefore
H er.50 the funne . Hieremy pronounccth that all the cruelty that the Chal-
2 5, dcts vfcd in luryjwas the workc of God. For which caufe Nabucad-
nczer is called the feruaunt of God . God euery where crieth out that
Ef'v 5. ^"^'^ ^'^ hiffing,with the found of histrompet,with his power & c6-
. s.' ' maundement the wicked are ftirred vp to war. He Crilleth the Affirian
B<>.io.j the rod of his wrath, and the axe that he moueth with his hand.Thc
tiay « i> deftruftion of the holy city and ruine of ^he Temple he calleth his
*^* woike . Dauid not murmuring againft God, but acknowledging hitn
for a righteous iudge, yet confcfTcth that the curfin^'SofSemei pro-
- J ^ cecded of the commaundemt-nt of God. The Lord (fayth he) com-
,0. maunded him to curfc. We often finde in the holy hiftory, thaiwhat-
foeucr iiappeneth it cometh of the Lord , as the departing of the ten
I. Kings tnbeSjthe death of the fonnesof Hcly, and very many things of like
t..]x. fort.Thcy thatbe meanly exercifed in the Scriptures do fee, that for
I Sa, ». ftiortne{]esfake,Ibring forth of many teftimonies bur a few,by which
J"** yet it appcareth plainly enough,that they do trifle & talke fondly,that
thruft in a bare Suflferace in place of the Prouidece of God,as though
God fate in a watch tower way ting for the chaunces of Fortune ,& (6
his iutlfiements (hould hang vpon the will of men.
1 Now as cocerning fecret motions,that which Salom6 fpcakcth
p of y hart of a king,th^t it is bowed liither or thither as pleafeth God,
j^ extendeth furcly to all mankinde, and is as much in effe^fl as if he bad
faydiwhatfoeuer we conceiue in mindes, is by the fecret infpiration of
God dueded to this end. And truely if he did not work in (he mindes
of
God the Creator. Lib.i. 84
of mcn,it were not rightly fayd, that lie takcih away the lip from the
true fpeakerSjand wildom fio aged men,that lie takcth the hart from
the Princes of the earth , that they may wander where is no beaten
way. And herto belongeth that which we oft read.that men are fear- Ezec.7.
full fof^r forth as their harts be taken with his feare. So Daunl went s*?.
out of the campcof Saulc and none was ware of it, becaufe the fiepe ^e^'^^*
of God was come vpon them all . But nothing can be dcllrcd to be J 5^ ,^
more plainly fpoken,th3nwhere he fo oft pronoiinceth,that he blm-
dcth the eyes of men,and ftriketh them with giddmelfc , that he ma-
keth them drunkc with the fpirite of drowfinenb , cafteth them into
inadne$,& hardneth their harts. Thefc things alfo mnny do referre to
Suflferanccas if in forfaking tiie reprobate,he fuft' ed them to be blm-
ded by Satan . But that foiution is to fonde , forafmuch as the Holy
ghoft in playne wordes cxprefTeth , that they are ttukcn with bhnd-
nelTe and madnefle by the iuft iudgement of God . It is fjyd,that he EccJc-r
hardned the hart of Pharao, alfo that he did make dull & ftrengthen ^-^
it. Some do with an vnfauory cauillation mockc out tnefe phrafes of Hxod.«.
fpechjbecaufe where in an other place it is fayd, that Pharao did bar- 15.
den his owne hart, there is his ownc will fet for the caufe of his har-
dening. As though thefe things did not very well agree together,3l-
though in diutrs maners , that man while he is moucd in working by
Godjdoth alfo workc himfelfe. And I do turne backe their obiedioti
againft thcmfclues. For, if to harden do fignifie but a bare Sufferance
then the very morion of obftinacy fhall not be properly in Pharao.
Now how weake and foolifh werw' it fo to expounde,as if Pharao did
only fuffcr himfelfe to be hardened? Moieouerthe Scripture cuttcth
of all occafions from fuch cauill jfjons . For God fayth , I will holde Exod.4,
hishart. Sooftheinhabiiauntesofthebnd of Canaan Mofes fayth, 2'«
that they went forth to b3ttaile,becaufe the Lord had hardened their ^'^ *
harts. Which fame thing is rcpeted by an other Prophet , faying : He lifj.ioj
turned their harts that they Ihould hate his people . Againe in Elay 2 5 .
he fayth , that he will fend the AlTirians againft the deceitfuU nation, ^*^. 10,
& will commaund them to cary away the fpoyles, and violently take *
the pray, not meaning that he will teache wicked and obftinatc men
to obey willingly , but that he will bow them to execute his iudge-
mentes as if they did beaie his commaundcmentes graucn in theyr
niindes.Wherby appearcth that they were moucd by the certain ap-
pointment of God, Igrauntthat God doth oftentimes worke in the
reprobate by Satans ieruice as a meane , but yet fo that Satan doth
his office by Gods mouing , and proceedeth fo farre as ts giuen him. « ^
The cuill Spiritc troubled Saulc , but it is fayde that it was of God, ^^ '
L iiij.
Cap. 1 8. Ot the knowledge or
that we may know that the madncflfe of Saulc, came of the iufteren-
a.Cor. geancc of God. It is alfo fayd, that the fame Sata doth blind the min-
"♦"♦* des of the vnfaithfulhbut how fojbut only becaufe the cfFe^uall wor-
king of errour cometh from God himfcife,to make them belcue lyes
Exe. 14. ^^^^ refufe to obey the ttueth ? After the firft maner of fpeaking it is
^. fayd. If any Prophet fhall fpeake lyingly , I God haue dccciucd him.
Rom. I . According to the other maner of fpech it is fayd,that he geueth men
*•• into a reprobate minde:& to caft them into filthy defires , becaufe he
is the chiefe author of his owne iuft vengeance, & Satan is but only a
minifter thcrof .But becaufe we muft entrcate of this matter againe iti
the fecond booke,where wc Hiall difcourfc of free or bond wil of ma,
I thinke I h.^uc already (hordy fpoken fo much as this place required.
Let thisbcthcfnmme of all,tnatforafmuch asthe wiiof Godis faid
to be the cau'e of all things, his Prouidcnce is thought the gouerncs
in nil purpofcs & workes of men , fo as it (heweth forth her force not
only in the cled, which arc gouerncd by the holy Spirit,but alfo c6-
pclleth the reprobate to obedience.
3 Forafmuch as hitherto I haue recited onely fuch things .1$ arc
wrytten in the ScriptureSjplainly & not doutfu!ly,iet them that fearc
not wrongfully to fclander the heauenly oracles, take hede what ma-
ner ofiudgcmcnt they take vpon them. For if by fayned pretending of
ignorance they feeke apraifc of modcfty,what can be imagined more
proudly donc,thnn that to fctte one fmall word againft the authority
of God ? as T thinke othcrwifc,! like not to haue this touched. But i£
they openly fpeake euill,what pren^ile they with fpitting ag.iynft the
heaucn } But this is no new exampl; of way wardncfle , becaufe there
haue bin in all ages wicked & vngoi'iy men, that with raging mouth
barked againft this point ordodrine. But they fliallfeelc that thingc
indccde to be true, which long ago- the holy Ghoft fpakcbythc
fC$i6 mouth of Dauid,that Godmay ouercome when he is iudged.Dauid
doth by the way rebuke the madnefl'e of men in this fo vnbridled li-
centioufncfie , that of their owne filthinefle they do not onely argue
againft God, but alfo take vpon them power to condemne him . In
the mcanc time he ihortly admonilheth, that the blafphcmies which
they vomitc vp againft the heauen do not reach vnto God , but that
f Joh y. ^^ driuing away the cloudcs of cauillations doth brighily ftiew forth
4. his righteoufncflcjand alfo our faith ( becaufe being grounded vpon
the word of God, it is aboue all the worlde)doth from her hye place
contcmptuoudy lookcdowne vppon thefe rnyftes . For firft where
they obied , that if nothing happen but by the wiU of God, then are
there in him two contrary willcs , becaufe lie dccrccth thofe thingcs
God the Creator. Lib. i . 85
by fccrct purpofe , which he hath openly forbidden by his law , that
is calily wiped away.But before I aunfwcre it, I will ones againe gcuc
the readers warning that this cauillntion is throwen out not againft
me, but agamlt the holy Gholl, which taught the holy man lob this
confeflion: As itpleafed Godjfo it came to paflc. When he was fpoi- ^^° '•
led by theues,he acknowledged in the iniuric and hurte that they did
him, the iuft fcourge of God. What fnieih the Scripture in other pla-
ces?The Tonnes of Hely obeyed not their Fatherjbecaufe it was Gods '•^*'»»
will to kill them. A Ifo an other Prophet crieih out , that God which pj- ^\ -^
iitteth in heauen doth what fo eucr he will . And now 1 hauc (hewed j.
plainly enough that God is the author of all thofe thingcs which
thefe iudgcs woulde haue to happen onely by his idle fnftcranc^. He Efa, 45;
icftificth that he crcateth light and darkcneffe , that he formeth good T*
and euill, that no euill happeneth which he himfelfc hath not made. ^^
Let them tell me, I befcch them , whether he do willingly or againft Deu.i>
his will execute his ownc iudgcmentes ? But as Mofes teacheth , that 5*
he which i* flaine by the falling of an axe by chaunce, is deliuercd by
God into the hand of the ftriker : fo the whole church faieth in Luke, AdJ.4.
that Herode and Pilate confpircd to do tho'e thinges , whiche the >8.
hande and purpofe of God had decreed. And truly if Chrift were not
crucified with the will of God, whcnle came redemption to vs ? And
yet the will of God neither doth ftriue with it fclfc , nor is chaungcd, ^P"**l»
nor faineth that he willcth not the thing that he will : but wiiere it is
but one and limpic in him, it fcmeth to vs manyfoldc , becaufe accor*
dingtothc weakeneir^of ourwitweconceiuanothow God in di-
ucvs mancr willeth and willcth not one felfe thing . Paulc , after that
he hath faid, that the calling of the Getiles is a hidde mifterie,withift
a litle after faieth further , that in it was manifeftly ihe wed the many--
foldt wifcdom of God : becaufe for the dullnelTc of our wide xhe
wifedom of God fccmeth to vs manyfolde , or ( as the olde interpre-
tour hath tranflated it) of many fafhions : ihali we therefore drcamc
that there is any varietie in God himfelfejas though he either chaun-
gcth his purpofe, or diflenieth from himfclfe ? Rather when we con- ^
ceiuc not how God will hauc the thing to be done , which he forbid-
deth to do, let vs call to minde our owne weakeneflTe , and therwithall
confider that the light whcrin he dwclkth, is not without caufe cal-
led Inacceflible , bycaufc it is couered with darkenefle . Therfore all j.Tiin.<
godly and fobre men will eafily agree to this fentenceof Auguftine, 16,
that fometime ma with good will willeth that which God willeth not. ^"chi-
As if a good Tonne willeth to haue his father to liue , whom God will i^^^*^
hauc to die. Againcit may come to paflejihat man may will the faiu^ cap.ioi
v^ap. Id. Ut the knowledge or
thing wirh an cuill will,which God wiUeth with a good will. As if an
euiU fonne wilieih to hauc his father to die, and God alfo willeth the
(ame. Now the fiiil of thefe two fonnes wiUeth that which God wil-
ieih not, & the other fonne willeth that which God alfo willeth, and
yetthcnaturalnefTeof the firft fonne doth better agree with the will
of God, although he willeth a contrary thing, than the vnnaiural-
neffc of the other fonne that willeth the fame thing . So great a dif*
fcrcnce is there what to will doth belong to man , and what to God,
& to what ende the will of euery one is to be applied,ro hauc it eiihej:
allowed ordifalowed. For thofethinges which God willeth well he
bringeth to paffe by the euill willes of euill men. But a Itttel before he
had faid , that the Angels apoRataes in their faUing away t and all the
reprobate, in as much as concerneth them felues,did that which God
wouldenotjbutinrcfpedoftheomnipotcncicofGodjthcy coulde
by no meanes fo do , becaufe whilr they did agamft the will of God»
PC. Ill *^^ ^^'^^ of God was done vpon them. Whcrvpon he cricth out:Greae
«. ' arc the workes of God, and ought to be foughc out of all them that
loue thcm:that in meruailous mancr the fame thing is not done with*
out his will which is alfo done againft his wil,becaufe it coulde not be
done if he did not fuffrc it : and yet he doth it not againft hii will,but
willingly:and he being good,would not fuffer a thing to be done euill,
vnleflc for that he is omnipotent,he coulde of euili make good.
4 In the fame maner is affoiled or rather vanifheth away the other
obiedion : that if God do not oncly vfe the fcruice of wicked men,but
alfo gouerneth their counfels and afFcdions „ he is the author of all
wicked doingcs,and theifore men arc vnworthily condemncd,if they
execute that which God hath dccrecd.becaufe they obey his wilhfor
it is done amilfe to confound his will and commaundement together,
which it appeareth by innumerable examples to differ farre afundcr.
i.Sim. ^^^ though when Abfalon abufed his fathers wiues, it was Gods will
i6.i». to punifhDauicJsadulterie with that diOionor: yet did he not there-
fore commaunde the wicked fonne to commirte incefte , vnlefTe per-
hap you meane it in rcfped of Dauid , as he fpeakcth of the railingcs
of Semei . For when he coofelfeth that Semei raileth at him by the
commaundement of God , he doth not therin commende his obe-
diencCjas if that froward dogge did obey the commaildement of God,
but acknowledging his tongue to be the fcourge of Godjhe paciently
fuffreth to be corrtded. And this is to be holden in minde,that when
God performeth by the wicked tliat thing which he decreed by his
fecretiudgemet, they are not to be eKcufed,as though they did obey
his commaundement , which in dedc of their owne euill luA they do
pur-
God the Creator. Lib.i. 26
purpordy br eake. Now how that thing is of Gocl,and is ruled by his
fccrct Prouidence , wliich men do wickedly , the eleftion of king la- ,^]f ,•„-,
robeam isa pbineexample ,in which ihe rafhenefTe and madncfle of ,1.20. '
the people IS feuerly condemned, for that they perucrted the order
apomted by God , and falfely fell from the houle of Dauid , and yet
we know it was his will that he (houldc be annointed . VVhcrvpon in
the very wordes of Ofee there appereih a certaine {hew of repugna- qc^^ |
cic , that where God complayncd that that kingdome was creded 4.
without his knowledge>and againfl his will, in an other place he faith, Ofee 1 1
that he gauc the kingdome to larobeam in his rage. How {hall thclc "•
fayinges agree ? that larobeam reigned not by God > nnd that he was
made kin^ by the fame God ? Eucn thus , becaufe neither coulde the
people fall from the houfe of Dauid , but that they muft fliake of the
yoke which God had layed vpon th'^m: neither yet had God his li-
bcrtie taken away , but that he might fo punifh the vnrhankefulncflit
of Salomon. We fee th^rfore how God in not willing falfe breach of
allegeancejyet to an other end iuiUy willcth a falling away from their
prince , whervpon larobeam befide all hope was by holy annointing
d/iuen to be king. After this msner doth the holy Inltorie fay , that
there wasanennemie raifcd vp to fpoile Salomons fonne of part of *'^'"S»
his kmgdome. Let the readers diligemly wey both thefe thinges , be- *^'*J'
caufe it had pleafed God to haue the people gouemed vnder the hand
of one king. 1 hcrefore when it v/as diuidcd m two paries it was done
againft his will. And yet the diuifion tooke beginning of his will. For
furclyjwhei e as the Prophet both by wordes and ccrcmonie of anoin-
ting did moue larobeam when he thought cf no fuch thing , to hope
of the kingdomcj this was not done without the know ledge or againft
the will of God , which commaunded it fo to be done : and yet is the
rebellion of the people iuftly condemned , for that as it were againft
the will of God, they fell from the polkririeof Dauid. In thrsmaner
itis alfo afterward further faid, that where Rehabeam proudely defpi-
Ccd the requefte of the people, this was done by God to confirme the
word which he had fpoken by the hand of Ahihajhis fergant.Lo how
againft Gods will the facred vnitie is torne in funder , and yet with the
Will of the fame God tenne tribes do forfake Salomons fonne. Let vs ^ xines
adde an other like example. Where the people confenting,yea laying 1 0.7,
their handes vnto it,the (bnnes of Ahab were (laine,& all his offpring
roored our. Ichu faid in deede truely , that nothing of the wordes of
God were fallen to the grounde, but that he had done all that he had
fpoken by the hande of his feruanc Elias. And yet nor vniuftly he rc-
kuketn the citczens of Samaria/or that they had put their handes vn-
Cap.i 8, Of the knowledge of God thcCrcator.
to it. Arc yc righteous , faith he , If I iiauc confpircd againft my lord,
who hath killed all thefe ? I haue before ( as I thinkc ) already decla-
red plainly , how in one fclfe worke both the faulte of man doth be-
wray it felfe, and alfo the righteoufneiTeof God glorioufly apearcth,
Epifto. And for modeft wictes this aunfwerc of Auguftine fhall alway fuffife:
48. ad where as the father dehuercd the fonne, & Chnft deliuered his body,
Vinccn. g^ jujjj deliuered the Lord: why in this dehuering is God righteous,
and man faultic ? becaufe in the fame one thing which they did , the
caufc was not one , for which they did it . If any be more combcr<?4
with this that we now faic.that there is no confcnc of God with man,
where man by the righteous mouing of God doth that which is not
Degra-^^wfull, let them remember that which Auguftine faith in an other
tia &li- place: Who fhall not tremble as thefe iudgemenies,where God wor«
bcroar- keth euen in the hartes of euill men what fo euer he will,and yet ren-
adVa- ^^^^^ ^^ ^^^^"^ according to their dcferuinges? And trucly m the falfci.
Icnt.ca. hoode of ludas , it fhall be no more lawfull 10 laic the blame of the
to, wicked deede to God,bccaufe he himfelfe willed him to be dehuered.
and did deliuer him to death, then it ftialbe to geuc away the praife of
our redemption to ludas . Therfore the fime writer doth in an other
place trucly te\ vs,that in this examinatio God doth not enquire what
men might haue done , or what they haue done , but what their will
was to do, that purpofe and will may come into the accompt . They
that thinke this harde, let them a litle while confidcr, how tolerable
their owne way wardenelfe is , while they rcfufe a thing witneiTed by
plaine teftimonies of Scripture , becaufe it excedeth their capacitic,
and do finde faulte that thefe thinges are vttcrcd, which God, vnlcflc
he had knowen them profitable to be knowen , woulde neuer haue
commaunded to be taught by his Prophetcs and Apoftles. For
our being wife ought to be no more but to embrace with
meke willingnelTe to learne,and that without exception
whatfocuer is taught in the holy Scriptures. As for
them that do more frowardly outrage in prating
againft it, (ith it is euident that they babble
againft God, they are not worthy
of a longer confutation.
The ende ofthefirfi books.
THE
8*7
THE SECOND BOOKE \
OF THE INSTITVTION OF
CHRISTIAN RELI GI ON, WHICH
intrcatcth of the knowledge of God the
Rcdcmcr in Chrift, which knowledge was
firfl: opened to the Fathers in the time
of the Lawc, and then to vs
in the GofpelJ,
The fir ft Chapter.
Thdt by ^dames/h»eMnd falling away ^ mankmie btcttmt Menrfei ^ anddidd^
generattfrctn his fit ji eJiMtt:vvhtrin is tntreated tfOrigiTukUJinnt.
O T without caufc hath the Knowledge of him-
fclfc bin in the oldc prouerbc fo much commen-
ded to man. For if ic be thought a Oiamc to be
ignorant of all thinges that pcrcaine to the courle
of mans life^then much more fhameful is the Not
knowing of our felues , whereby ic commcth to
paffcjthat in taking coufcll of any thing ncccflary,
we be miferably dafeledjyea altogether bhnded. But how much more
proHcable th>$ leflbn is, fo much more diligently muft we take hecde*
that we do not difordrely vfe it , as we fee feme of the Philofophera
haue done. For they in exhorting man to know him fclfe , do withail
appoint this to be the ende , why he (houlde know him fclfe ,. that he
ihoulde not be ignorant of his owne dignitie andexccllcncicrand no-
thing cIs do they will him to beholdc in himfelfc , but that whcrby he
may fwell with vaine confidcnce,and be puffed vp with pride. But the
knowledge of our felues, lirft ftandeth in this poime , that conGdering
what was gcuen vs in creation , and how bountifully God continueth
his gracious fauour toward vs , we may know how great had bin the
cxcellencic of our nature,if it had cotinued vncorrupted : and wc may
withail thinke vpon this, that there is nothing in vs of our owne , but
that we haue as gotten by borrowing all that feod hath bellowed vpo
vsjthat wc may alwaies hang vpon him. Then,that we call to mindc
our mifcrable eftate after the fall of Adam , the fechng whcrof may
throw downe all glorying and trutt of our fclucSjOucrwhelme vs with
(hame and trucly humble vs . For as God at the beginning fafhioned^^,
vs hkc his owne imaje,to the ende to rai(e vp our mindcs both to the ^*"'*
Cap. I. Of the knowledge of
iludy of vertue and to the meditation of eternall life, Co Icaft the (•
great noblcnefle of our kmde, which makeih v s different from brute
bcaftes , fhoulde be drowned with our flothfulnefTe , it is good for v$
to know* that wc are therFore endued with reafon and vnderftanding,
that in keping a holy and honeft hfe,we fhoulde precede on forward
to the appointed endeof bleflld immortalitie. Butthefirft dignicie
can not come in our mjnde , but byandby on the othcrfide the heauy
fight of our tJlthinelTe and fhame doth thruft it lelfe in prefence,fincc
wc in the perfon of the fiift man are fallen from our Hrft eftate,wherc
vpon groweth the hatred ar.d lothing of our fclues , and true humi-
litic,& there is kindetcd a new defire to fcekc for God,in whom euery
of vs may rccouer thofe good thinges , wherof we are founde altogi-
ther voide and emptie.
i This thing furely the truth of God appointeth to be fought in
examining of our fclues , I meanc , it requireth fuch a knowledge a$
may both call vs away from all confidence of our ownc power , and
making vs deftitute of all matter to glory vpon , may bring vs to fub-
midion. Which rule it behoueth vs to keepe, if we will attaine to the
true marke both of right knowledge and welldoing. Neither yet am
1 ignorant how much more picafant is that other opinioii that allu-
reth vs rather to confider our good thinges , than to looke vpon our
mifcrable nedyncfle and dilhonor , which ought to ouerwhtlme vs
with(hame. For there is nothing that mans nature more couetcth,
than to be ftrokcd with ftatterie : and therefore when he heareth the
giftcsthatarcinhimtobemagnvfied, heleaneth tothat lidc with
ouermuch lightnefle of belcfciwherby it is (o much leflc to be mar*
ueilled , that herein the greatert parte of men hauc pcrnicioufly er-
red. For fith there is naturally planted m all mortal men a more thati
blinde loue of ihem fclucs,thcy domoft willmgly perfwadc them fel-
ues , that there is nothing in them that they ought worthyly to hate.
So without any maintenance of other , this moft vaine opinion doth
cch where get credit , that man is aboundantly lufficient of him felfc
to make him felfe liuc well and blefiedly . But if there be any that are
content to thinkc more modeftly, howefoeuer they grauntfome*
what to God, Icaft they (houldc feemc arrogantly to take all to them
fclucSjyet they fo parte Jt,that the principall matter of glory and con-
fidence alway remaineth with th<.m felues. Now if there come talke,
that with her alluremences nckeleth the pride that already of it felfe
itchcth within the bones, there is nothing that may more delite them.
Therefore as any hath with his extolling moft fauourahly aduaun-
ccd the cxceiUncie of mans nature , (b hath he bin accepted with the
well
GodtheRcdemcr. Lib.2. 88
tvelllykingreioicemenc in manner of all ages. But what foeuer fuch
commendacion there be of mans txcellencic that tcachcth man to
rcfte in him felfe, ic doth nothmg but delite with that her fwetencflc,
and in dcde fo decciucth , that it bringeth to moft wretched deftruc-
tion ail them that aflent vnto ic . For to what purpofe auailcch it for
vs, ftanding vpon all vaine confidence to deuife , apoinc , attempt and
go about thofe thinges that we thinke to be for our behoofc , ar»d in
our firll beginning of enterprifc to be forfake and deftiiurc of founde
vnde; ftanding and true ftrength , and yet to go on boiddy till we fall
downc into deftruftion? But it can not oiherwife happrn to them thac
haue affiauncc that they can do any thuig by their owne powcr.Thcr-
fore if any man geuc heede to fuch teachers thac holde vs in consi-
dering oncly our owne good thinges , he fhall not profite in learning
to know him felfe , but Ihall be carried violent!/ away into the worit
kindc of ignoraunce.
^ Therfore,wherc as in this point the trueth of God doth agree
with the common naturall meaning of all men, that the fecond part
of wifedome confifteth in the knowledge of our fclucs , yet in th«
very manner of knowing there is muchc difagrcement . For by the
judgement of the Befli , a man thinkcch that he hath then well fear-
ched himfelfe , when trufting vpon his owne vndei ftanding and iti"
tegritie, he takcth boldcnefl'e, and cncouragcth him felfe to doing
the ducties of venue and bidding battcil to vices , trauaileth with alt
his ftudic to bende himfelfe to that which is comly and honeft. But
he that loketh vpon and trieth himfelfe by the rule of Gods iudge-
ment , findeth nothing that may raife vp his minde to good affiance:
and the more inwaidely that he hath examined him feifc , the more
bejsdifcouraged, till being altogether fpoiled of all confidence , he
leaucth to himfelfe nothing towardc the well ordering of his hfc.
And yet woulde not God haue vs to forgettc the firft noblenefle that
he gaue to our father Adam , which ought of good right to awake
vs to the ftudie of nghteoufncfle and goododFe. For we can not con-'
fider either our owne firft cftate, or to what endc we are created , but
we fhalbe pricked forwarde to ftudie vpon immortalitie , and to de-
iirethe kingedome of God . But that conlideration is fo farrc from
putting vs in courage, that rather difcouraging vs , it throweih vs
doune tahumblencfle. For what is that firft eltate of ours ? euen thac
from whence we are fallen. What is that endc of our creation ? euca
the fame from which we arc altogether turned away : fo that lo-
ihingour owne miferablc eftate , we may grone for forrowe , and in
grooing may alfo figh for the l&ftc of that digmtic. Buc now when we
Cap.!. Of the knowledge of
fay mat man ought to beholtie nothing in himfclfc that may make
him of boldt courage , we meanc that there is nothing in him vpon
affiance wherot he ought to be proude. Wberfore, if any lift to hearc
what knowledge man ought to hauc of himfelfe, let vs thus diuidc it,
that Brit he conlider to what cnde he is created , & endued with giftes
that are not to be dcfpifed , by which thought he may be ftyrred vp
to the mcditatio of the hearing of God and of the life to come. Then
let him wcye his ovvne ftrength, or rather needy want of ftrength ,by
perceiuing whereof he may lie in extreme confufion , as one vtterly
brought to naught . The hrft of thefe confiderations tendeth to this^
cndc, that he may know what is his duetie : and the other,how much
he is able to do towardc the perfourming of it . We will entrcate of
them both,as the order of teaching fliall require. •»
4 But bicaufc it mull nedes b;: that ir was not a light negligence*
but a dcteftable wicked a(^e which God fo feucrely puniihed, we muft
confidcrthc very fourme of the fame in the fall of Adam, that kinde-
Icd the horrible vengeauncc of God vpon all mankinde.lt is a childifh
opinion that hath commonly bin receiucd , concerning the intetapc-
rauccofglottonicj as though the fummeand headof allvertucscon-
fifted in the forbearing of one only frute, when there flowed on euery
fide ftorc of all fortes of dejnties that were to be defired, and when in
that blefled frutefulnciTe ot the earth, there was not onely plenty,but
alfo vanetie to make fare for plcafure. Therefore we muft iooke fur-
ther , bicaufe the forbidding him from the tree of the knowledge of
good and euill , was the triall of obedience , that Adam in obeying
might proue that he was wiUingly fubied to the gouernemet of God.
And the name of the tree it feite fheweth, that that commaundement
wai geucn for none oiher ende , than for this that he contented with
his owne cftatc, fhouldenor with wicked luft aduaunce himfelfe
higher. But the promile whereby he was bidden to hope for eternall
hfe, Co long as he d»<] not eate of the tree of lifC) and againc the hor-
rible threatening of death fo fone as he Ihoulde tafte of the tree of
knowledge of good and euill , (erued to proue and exercife his faiths
Herof it is not harde to gitnt r , by what meanes Adam prouoked the
wrath of God againfl him fclfe^ Augulfine in deed e faieth not amille^
when hefaicth,that pride was the beginning of all euiis!l^or if ambitio
had not lifted vp man higher than was lawfull and than was permit-
ted him , he might haue continued in hi* cftate : but we mufl fetch a
more full definition from the maner of the tentation that Mofes dcf-
cribcth. For fith the woman was with the deceit of the Serpent lead
away by infidehtie , now it appeaieth that uifobedicncc was the be-
ginning
GodthcRedcmcr, Lib.2. 8p
ginning of the fall. Which thing Paule confirmcth , teaching that all Rom.
men were lofte by one mans difobedience. But it is withall to be no- * >•
tcd,that the fiift man fell from the fubiedion of God , for that he not
onely was taken with the entifementes of Satan,but alfo defpifingthc
truetbj did turne out of the waie to lying . And furcly Gods wordc
being ones defpifed , all reuercnce of God is fhaken of. Bicaufe his
maicftie doth no other waies abide in honor among vs , nor the wor-
fhip of him remaine inuiolate , but while we hang vpon his mouth.
Therforc infidclitie was the roote of that falling away.But therupon
arofe ambition and pride , to which was adioyned vnrhankefulncflc,
for that Adam in coueiing more than was grauntcd, did vnreuerently "
dcfpiic the fo great hberalitie of God wherwith he was enriched. And
this was a moftruous wickedneflcjthat the fonnc of the earth thought
it a fmall thing that he was made after the hkenefle of God , vnleffe he
might alfo be made egall with God . If Apoftafie be a filthy and de-
fcftable oft'ence , wherby man withdrawetn him ftlfe from the alie-
geaunceof his crcatour, yea outrageoufly Ihaketh of his yoke : then
it is but vaine to extenuate the Sinnc of Adam.Albeit it was no fimplc
Apoftafie , but ioyned with fliamefuU reprochcs againft God , while
they aflented to the fclaundersof Satan , wlierin he accufed God of
lying, enuie, and niggardly grudging. Finally , infidelitie opened the
gate to ambition, ambition was the mother of obftinate rebellion , to
make men caft away the fearc of God , and throw themfelues whe-
ther their luft caricd ihem. Therfore Bernard doth rightly teach that
^he gate of faluation is opened vnto vs , when at this day we receiuc
the Gofpell by our cares : eucn as by the fame windowcs , when they
ftode open to Satan,death was let in . For Adam woulde neuer hauc
bin fo bolde, as to do againft the commaundemcnt of God , but for
this that he did not beleue his worde. Truely this was the beft bridle
for the right keping of all aftediions in good ordcr,to thinkc that ther
is nothing better thantokeperighteoufncfTe in obeying the com-
maundementes of God, and then that the chiefe ende of happy life
is to be beloued oi him. He therfore being carried away with the bla-
fphemies of the Dcuill,did (afmuchas in him lay) extinguifh the
whole glory of God.
5 As the fpirituall life of Adam was,to abide ioyned and bounde
to his creatour, fo his alienation from him was the death of his foule.
Neither is it marucU if he by his falling away, dcftroyed all his ownc
pofteritic,whichpcruerted the whole order of nature in heauenand
in earth. All the creatures do grone , faith J^aule, being made fubieft Rom. I
to corruption againd their w.l'.If one (hould af ke the caufeuio doubc
M
Cap.i. Ofthe knowledge of '
it i> for that they bcare parte of that punifhment that man deferucd,
for whofc vfe they w.ociEL created. Sith the the curfc that goth through-
out all the co^ftes ofthe worlde procedcd from his fault both vpward
and downewarde., it is nothing againft rcafon, if itfpread abrode into
all his iifue. • Thcrforc after that the heauenly image m him was defa-
ced, he did not alone fufFcr this puni(hment,that in place of wifdom,
ftrength,hQlynefre, truth^nd iuftice (with which ornamentes he had
bm clothed ) there came in tlie moft horrible peftdences , blindnefle,
weakenefle, filthmefTcfalfchodejand iniuftice, but alfo he entangled
and drowned his whole offpring in the fame mifcrics.This is the corr
ruption that commeth by mheritaunce , which the olde writers cal-
led original finne, meaning by this worde finnejthe corruption of na-
turc,which before was good and pure. About which matter they hauc
had much contcntion,bycaufe there is nothing farther of from com-
mon reafon,than all men to be made giltie of one mans fault , and fo
the hnne to become common . Which (emeth to hauc bin the caufe
why the oldeft Dodors of the Church did but darkcly touch this
point , or at lead did not fet it out fo plainly as was conuenient . And
yet that fearefulneflfc could not bring to paflejbut that Pelagius arofe,
whofc prophane inuention was that Adam finned oncly to his ownc
loife , and hurted not his pofteriiic . So through this futteltie , Satan
went about by hiding the difeafejto make it incurablc.But when it was
prouf d by manifcft teftimonie of Scripture,that finne pafled from the
firft man into all his pofteritie,he brought this cauillation,that it pa(^
fed by imitation, but not by propagation. Therefore good men tra-
uelled in tluspoint,and aboue all other Auguftine,to {hew that we arc
corrupted not by forreinwickedneffe ,but that we bring with vsfrom
thewombeof our mother avicioufnefle planted in our begetting,
which to deny was to great fhamelefnefle.But the raOinefle ofthe Pe-
lagians and Ccleftians will not feeme maruelous to him,which by the
writinges ofthe holy man (hal perceauCjhow fliamcleffc beaftcs they
were in all other thinges. Surely it is not dourefully fpoken that Da-
Pfa K I "^'^ confefifeth that he was begotten in iniquities , and by his mother
J, conceaucd in finne. He doth not there accufe the finnes of his father
or mother, but the better to fet forth the goodncfle of God towardc
him,he bcginneth the confeflion of his ownc wickcdnefTe at his very
begetting. Fof-afmuch ositiseuidec that that was not peculiar to Da--
iiid alone,it folio weth tha; the common eftatc of all mankindc is no-
ted vnder his example. Ail v/e thcrforc that dcfccnd of vncleane [edc,
. . are borne infedcd which the contagion of finne , yea before that we
^ " ' ice the light of this hfe, wc be in the fight of God filthy and fpottcd.
Fof
GodtheRedemcr. Lib.2. po
For who coulde gcuc cleane of the vndcanneU'e ? noe one : as it is in
the bookc of lob.
6 We heare that the vncleannt fle of the parcntes fo pafTeth into
the childrcnjthat all without any exception at their beginning are dc-
Hled.But of this defiling we fliallnot finde the beginningjVnlcflc we go
vp to the fir ft parent of all vs,to the well head.Thus it is therforcthat
Adam was not only the progenitor, but alfo the roote of mans na-
ture,and therefore in his corruption was all mankindc worthely cor-
rupted : which the Apoftle maketh plaine by comparing of him and
Chrift. As (faith he) by one man finne entrcd into the whole world, ^-°"^- 5-
and death by finne, and fo death went ouer all men , forafmuch as all * *"
hauc finned : fo by the grace of Chriftjiightcoufnefie and life is rtfto-
redvntovs. What will the Pelagians here prate? that Adams finnc
wasfpread abroad by imitation ? Then haue we no other profit by
the rightcoufiicffc of Chrift , but that he is an example fet before v$
to follow ? Who can abide fuch robberie of Gods honor ? If it be out
ofqueftionthacChriftes righteoufnefie is ours by communication,
and therby liferit foUoweth alfo,that they both were fo loft in Adam,
as they be recouered in Chriftrand that finne and death fo crept in by
Adam, as they are abolifhed by Chrift. The wordes are piaine , that
many are made righteous by the obediece of ChriftjSS by the difobc-
dience of Adam they were made finncrs ; and that therforc hetwene
them two is this relation , that Adam wrapping vs in his deftrudion,
dcftroied vs with him , & Chrift with his grace reftorcd vs to (alua-
tion.In (b cleare light of truth,! thinke we ncdc not a longer or more
laborous proofc. So alfo in the firft Epiftle to the Corinthians, when , ^^j.
he goeth about toftablifti the godly in the truft of the refurrcdiOjhc ij.j-.
ftiewcth that the life is couered in Chrift that was loft in Adam , he
that pronounceth, that we all are dead in Adam,doth alfo therwithall
plainly teftifie,th3t we were infeded with the filth of finne. For dam-
nation coulde not reach vnto the that were touched with no giltineflc
of iniquitie. But it can be no way plainlyer vnderftaded what he mea-
neth,than by relation of the other member of the fentencc, where he
teacheth that hope of life is reftorcd in Chrift. But it is well enough
knowen that the fame is done no other way, than whe by maruellous
maner of comunicating,Chrift pourcth into vs the force of his righre-
oufnefle. As it is written in an other place, that the fpiriic is life vnto Rom. S.
vSjfor righteoufneffc fake.Thcrfore we may not otheiwife expounde lo.
that which is faid that we are desd in Adam, but thus , that he in fin-
ning did not onely purchafe mifcheefc and ru'ine lo himfeh c, but alfo
threw downc our nature headlong into like defti udion. And that not
M ij.
Gap.i . Of the knowledge of
oncly to the corruption of himfelfc , which pertaineth nothing to vs,
but becaufe be infedcd all his fede with the fame corruption wher-
lphc.2. i»to he was fallen.For otheiwife the faying of Paule coulde not ftand
|. true, that all are by nature the fonns of wrath,if they were not alrea-
dy accurfed in the wombe . And it is eafily gathered , that nature is
there meant not fuch as it were create by God,but fuch as it was cor-
rupted in Adam. For it were not couenientjthat God lliould be made
' the author of Death. Adam thcrfore fo corrupted him felfe , that the
infedio pafled from him into all his offpring.And the hcaue. Jy iudge
'oh.$.6 himfclfe Chrjft,doih alfo plainly enough pronouce,thac all are borno
euill and corrupted , where he icacheth , that what foeuer is borne of
fledi , is fiefh , and that therefore the gate of life is dofed againfi all
men,vntill they be begotten againe.
7 Neither for the vndcrftanding thereof is any curioufe difputa-
tion ncdcfull , which not a htle combred the olde writers, whether
the foule of the fonnc do procede by deriuation from the foule of the
father, bycaufc in it the infedion principally refteth . We muft be
cement with this , that fuch giftes as it pleafed the Lord to haue bc-
ftowcd vpon the nature of man, he left them with Adam , and there-
fore when Adam loft them after he had rcceiued them , he loft them
not onely from himfelfe,but alfo from vs all.Who {hall be carcfull of
a conueyance from foule to foule, when he fliall heare that Adam rc-
ceiued thefe ornamentes which he loft , no IcflTe for vs than for him-
fclfe ? that they were not geuen to one man alone, but alTigned to the
whole nature of man ? Therefore it is not againft reafon, if he being
fpoiled, nature be left naked and poore : if he being infeded with
Smnejthc infedion crepeth into nature.Thcrfore from a rotten rootc
arofc vp rotten branches , which fent their rottennefle into the other
twigges that fprong out of them. For fo were the children corrupted
in the father , that they alfo were infediuc to their children : that is to
fay, (b was the beginning of corruption in Adam , that by continuall
flowyng from one to an other , it is conucyed from the auncefters in-
to the pofteritie. For the infedion hath not her caufe in the fubftauce
of the fiefh or of the foule , but bycaufe it was fo ordeyned of God,
that fuche giftes as he had geuen to the firft man , man (houlde both
haue them , and lofe them as well for him felfe as for his . As for
this that the Pelagians do cauill, that it is not likely that the children
do take corruption from godly parentcs , fith they ought rather to
, ,°^J^ be fandificd by their cleanneire,that is eafely confuted. For they dcf-
i Ce- cendc not of their fpirituall regeneration, but of their carnall gene-
eft, radon. * Therefore, as Augultinc fayeth, whether the vnbeleucr be
con-
GodtheRedemcr. Lib.2. pi
condemned as giltie , and the beleucr quittc as innocent, they both
do beget not innoccntes , but gihic , bycaufe they beget of the cor-
rupted nature . Now where as they do in manner partake of the pa-
rentes hohneflc ,» that is the fpeciall bleiTmgofthe people of God,
which prouethnot but that the firtt and vniuerfall curfe ofmankindc
went before. For of nature is gihinefle , and fan^ification is of fuper-
naturall grace.
8 And to the ende that thefe thinges be not fpokcn of a thing
vncertaine and vnknowen ,, lette vs define Originall finnc . But yet I
meanenot to examine all the definitions that are made by writers,
but I will bring forth one onely , which I thinke to be moft agrea-
ble with trueth . Originall finne therefore femeih to be the inheri-
tably defcending petuerfneffc and corruption of our nature , poured
abroade into all the partes of the foule, which firftmaketh vs giltie
ofthe wrath of God, and then alfo bringeth forth thefe workcs in
vs , which the Scripture calleth the workes of the flefli : and that is it
properly that Paule oftentimes calleth Sinne. And thefe workes that q^i -
arife out of it, as are adulteries , fornications , theftes, hatreds , mur- i^,
thers , banketmges , after the fame manner he calleth the fruites of
finne, albeit they are hkewife called finnes both commonly in the
Scripture, and alfo by the fame Paule himfeUe. Thei^forc thefe
two thinges are diftindly to be noted : that is , that being fo in all
partes of our nature corrupted and peruerted , we are now euen for
fuche corruption onely holdcn worthily damned and conuided be-
fore God, to whom is nothing acceptable butrighteoufnefle, inno-
cencie and pureneife. And yet is not that bonde in refpcd of an others
faulte. For where it is faid , that by the finne of Adam we are made
fubied to the iudgement of God , it is not fo to be taken , as if we in-
nocent and vndeleruing did beare the blame of his faulte. But by-
caufe by his offending we are all clothed with the curfe , therefore
it is faid that he hath bounde vs . NcuerihelelTe , from him not the
punifhement onely came vpon vs, but alfo the infcdion diftilled from
him, abideth in vs,to the which the punifhmcnt is iuftly due.Where-
fore howe fo euer Auguftine doeth oftentimes call it an others finnc>
( to fhewe the more plainely , that it isconueyed intovs by propa-
gation ) yet doeth he alfo affirme withall that it is propre to euery
one. And the Apoflle him felfe expreffely witnefTeth , that therefore ^ °"' '
death came vpon all mcnne , bycaufe all men hauc finned , and are
wrapped in Originall finne , and defiled with the fpottes thereof.
And therefore the very infantes themfelucs, while they bring with
them their owne damnation from their mothers wombe,are bounde,
M iij.
Cap.i . Of the knowledge of
not by an others, but by their ownc faulte . For though they hauc
not as yet brought forth the fruites of their ownc iniquitic , yec they
haue the fcede thereof enclofed within them : yea their whole na-
wre is a cerramc (cede of Sinne : therefore it can not be but hatefull
and abhorainable to God. W here vpon folio wcth, that it is proprcly
accompted (inne before God : for there coulde be no giltinclfe with-
out (iane. The other point is , that this peruerfcneffe neuer ceflcth
in vs , but continually bringcth forth newe frutes , euen the fame
workes of the fleflie that we haue before dcfcribcd : like as a bur-
ning fornace bloweth out flame and fparcles , or as a fpring doeth^
without ceadingcafl: out water. Therefore they which hauc defi-
ned Originall finne , to be a lacking of Originall righreoufnefle
which ought to haue bin in vs, although in deede they comprehende
all that is m the thing i: felfe : yet they hauc not fully enough cxpref-
fcd the force and efficacie thereof. For our nature is not oncly bare
and emptie of goodneife , but aUb is Co plenteous and frutcfull of all
cuilles, that it c?.n not be idle. They that haue faide , that it is a con-
cupifcencc, haue vfcd a woi'de not very farre from the matter , if this
were added , which is not graunted by the moft parte , that what Co
cuer is in man , euen from the vnderftanding to the will , from the
foule to the flefli,is corrupted and ftuffed ful with this concupifcence:
or,toendeitrhorilier, that whole man is of him fejfc nochingeels
but concupifcence.
9 WherforeJ hauc faide that all the partes of the foule arc poH-
felled of finne,()th Adam fell awaye from the fountainc of righceouf-
nefle. For not oncly the inferiour appetite allured him , but wicked
impietie poflclTed the very caftlc of his minde , and pride pearced to
theinnermoft parte of his hcarte. So that it isafonde andfoolifli
thing , to reftraioe the corruption that proceded from thence , onely
to the fenfuall motions as they call them , or to call it a certaine nou-
riture , that allureth , ftirreth and draweth to finne onely that parte,
which among them is called Senfualitie . Wherein Peter Lombarde
hath difclofed his grofle ignoraunce , which feeking and fearchjngfor
the place of it , faith that it is in the flefh , as Paule witnefleth , not
proprely in dede,but bycaufe it more appeareth in the ilefh,as though
Paule did meane oncly a parte of the foule , and not the whole na-
ture which is in comparifon fct againft fupernaturall grace. And Paule
there taketh away all doubte : teaching that corruption reftcth not in
one parte alone , but that nothing is pure and clcanc from the deadly
infedion thereof. For entreating of corrupted nature , he doth not
onely condemne the inordinate motions of appetites that appcare,
bue
God the Redemer. Lib.2. 5?2
but fpeclally trauaileih to proue chat the vnderftandjng mindc is fub-
icde to blmdenelk , and the hearte to peruerfncflre. And the fame
third chapter to the Romaines is nothing els but a defcripcion of ori-
ginall finnc . That appeareth more plainely by the renewing. For
the fpirice which is compared with the olde man and the flefli ,doth
not onely fignifie the grace whereby the infcriouror fenluall parte
of the foule is amended , but alfo conteineth a full reformation of
all the partes. And therefore Paule doth commaund , noconely that Ephe.4,
our groflfe appetites be brought to naught , but alfo that we our fel- *7.
lies be renewed in the fpirite of our mindc , as hkewife in an other
place he biddeth vs to be tranfibrmcd in newnefl'e of minde . Wher- Roma a
vpon followcth, that the fame parte, wherein moft of all fliinerh the i*
excellence and noblenelTe of the foule,is notonely wounded, but alfo
fo corrupted , that it needeth not onely to be healed , but in mnnncr
to put on a ncwe nature. How farre finne polTcfleth both the ynder^
ftanding minde and the hearte , we will fee hereafter . Here I onely
purpofed fhortely to touch that the whole man from the heade to
the foote is fo ouer whelmed as with an ouerflowing of water,that no
parte of him is free from (inne , and that therefore what Ibeuer pro-
cedcth from him is accompted for (inne , as Paule faith , that all the Rom. ?,
af]p'edions of the ticHi or ihoughtes , are enmities againft God , and 7.
therefore death.
10 Now let thf m go , that prefume to make God author of their
finnes , bycaufe we fay that menne are naturally finne full . They do
wrongfully feeke the workeof God in their owne filthy nefle , which
they ought rather to haue fought in the nature of Adam, while it
was yet foundc and vncorrupted . Therefore ourdcftrudion com-
luethofthefaulteofourowneflefhandnotof God, for afmuch as
we perifhed by no other mcane but by this, that we degend red from
ourfirfteftate. But yet let not any man here murmureand fay, that
God might haue better forefeen for our faluation, if he liad proui-
dedthat Adamfhouldenothauefallen. For this obiedioii both is to
be abhorred of all godly mindes , for the to much prefumptuous cu-
riofitic of it, and alfo perteineth to the fecretof predcftination which
fhall after be entreated of in place conuenient , Wherefore let vs rc-
membre that our fall is to be imputed to the corruption of nature,
that we accufc not God himfelfe the author of nature . True in dedc
it is , that the fame deadcly wounde flicketh faft in nature : but it is
muche materiall toknowe, whether it came into nature from ells
where , or from the beginning hath refted in it. But it is cuident that
the wounde was gcuen by finne . Therefore there is no caufe why
M iiij.
Cap.2. ' Of the knowledge of
wc flioulde complaine butofour felues: which thing the Scripture
ccl. 7. hathe dihgently noted . ForEcclefiaftes faieth : This baue I founder
^ that God hath made manne righteous , but they haue fought many
inuentions. It appeareth that the deftrudionof man is to be impu-
ted onely to himlcite, for afmuche as hauing gotten vprightnelTc
by the goodnefle of God, he by his owne madneife is fallen into
vanitie.
1 1 We faie therforc , that man is corrupted with faultinefle na-
turall, but fuch as preceded not from nature . We dcnie that it pro-*
ceded from nature , to make appeare that it is rather a qualitic come^
from fome other thing , whiche is happened to man, than a fubftan-
tiall properiie that bathe bin putte into him from the beginning.
Yet we call it Narurall , that no rnan Oioulde thinke that eucry man
gctteth It by euiil cuftome , wheras it holdeth all men bounde by in-
ncritabliedefcending right. And this we do not of our owne heads
ph.a.3 without authoritie. For, for the fame caufe the Apoftle teacheth,
that we are all by nature the children of wrath. How coulde God,
whome all his mcaneft workes do pleafc , be wrathefuU againft the
nobleftofall his creatures? But he is rather wrathefuU againft the
corruption of his worke , than againft his worke it fclfe . Therefore
if, for that mans nature is corrupted , manne is not vnfitly faide to
beby natureabhominabletoGod, itftialbe alfo net vnaptely cal-
led naturally perucrfe and corrupted. As Auguftine fearethnotin
refped ofnature corrupted,to call the finnes natural, which do necef-
faryly rcigne in our flefti where the grace of God is abfcnte . So va-
nyfheth away the fohfli tryfehng deuifc of the Maniches, which whe
they imagined an cuillnefle hauing fubftaunce in man , prefumed to
forge for him a new creator, leaft they fiiould fecme 10 affigne to the
righteous God the caufe and beginning of euilL
The ij. Chapter,
That man is now Jpoiled of the Freedome of vviU, and made
fubie^ to mtferahU bondage,
SI T H WC haue feen , that the dominion of finne , fins the time
that it helde the firft man bounde vnto it , doth not onely rci-
gne in all mankindcjbut alfo wholy poflefleth eucry foule : now
muft we more nercly examine , fins wc arc brought into that
bondage , whether we be fpoyled of allj Freedome or no : And if
yet there remaine any parcel! > how farre the force cherof proced&dw^
But
God the Redemer. Lib.2. pj
But to the ende that the trueth of this qucftion may more eafily ap-
peare vnto vs,I will by the way fet vp a maike,where vnio the whole
fummemay be dire dcd. And this rtiaibc the beft way to auoid errour,
tf the daungcrs be confidercd that are hke to fall on borh fides . For
when man is put from all vprightneflTejbyandby he therby takcth oc-
ca(ion of flouthfulnelfeiand becaufe it is fayd,that by himfelfe he can
do nothing to the ftudy of righteoufnefTe, forthwith he negle<^tcth it
wholly,as if itpertayned nothing vnto him. Againe,he can prefumc
to take nothing vpon himfelfe,be it ncuer fo litle,but that both Gods
honor fhalbc therby taken fro him, & man himfelfe be ouerthrowen
with rafli confidence. Therefore to the end we ftrike not vpon thcfc
rocks , this courfe is to be kept, that man being enformed that there
remaineth in him no goodncs, and being on euery fide compalfed a-
bout with moft mifernble necellity,may yet be taught to afpire to the
goodnes whereof he is voyd ,and to the liberty wherof he is depri-
ued, and may be more fharply ftirred vp from flouihfulnes, than if it
were fayned that he is furnillied with greateft power. How necefTaiy
this iecond point is , euer^ man feeth. The firft, I fee is douted of by
mo than it ought to be . For this beinge fette out of controuerfic , it
Qught then plainely to ftand for trueth, that nothing is to be taken a-
way from man of his owne,as farre as it behoueth tiiat he be throwne
downe from falfe boafting of himfelfe. For if it were not graunted to
roan to glory in himfelfe euen at that time, when by the bountifulnes
of God he was garnifhcd with moft fingular ornamcntcs,how much
ought he now to be bumbled,fith for his vnthankfulnefle he is thruft
downc from hie glory into extreame ihame? At that timc,I fay,when
he was aduaunced to the hieft degree of honorjthe Scripture attribu-
tcth nothing elfe vnto him,buc that he was created after the image of
God, whereby it fecretcly teacheth, that man was blefTed, not by hi5
own good thingSibut by the partaking of God. What therfore remai-
neth now , but that he being naked and deftitute of all glory, do ac-
knowledge God, to whofe liberality he could not be thankefull when
he flowed ful of the nchefle of his grace:and that now at length with
confeffion of hisowne pouerty hcglorifiehim, whom in the ac-
knowledging of his good gifts , he did not glorifie ? Alfo it is as much
for our profitte , that all praifc of wifdom and ftrength be taken from
vs,as it pertayneth to the glory of God , that they ioyne our ruyne
with the robbery of God,thac glue vnto vs any thing more,than that
which is true. For what is elfe done when we are taught to fight of
Oirr owne forcCjbut y we be lifted vpo hie on a ftaffe of a rcede,that it
may byandby brcake,and we fall to the ground?Albcit,our forces are
Cap.2. Of the knowledge of
yet to much commended when they arc compared to the ftafFtf of a
reede. For it is but fmoke all that vaync men haue imagined and do
babble of them . Wherefore not without caufe is this excellent fen-
tence oft rcpeted by Auguftine,that free will is rather throwen down
hcadlongc , than Itabhflicd by them that dcfende it . This I thought
necdcfull to fpeake before, as by way of preface for many mens faKS,
which when they hearc mans power ouerthrowcn from the ground,
that the power of God may be buyldcd in manne, do much hate this
manner of difputmgc as d.^ungcrous, much more fupcrfluous,which
yet appeareth to be both in religion necefTarie ^ and for vs moft pro<
fitable.
I Whereas we haue a litle before fayd , that in the vnderftanding
minde,and in the heart arc placed the powers of the foule, now let vs
confider what they both arc able to do . The Philolbphers in decde
with great cofent do imagmc that in the vnderftanding mindc fitteth
reafon, which like a lampe giueth light to all coufels,& Uke a Queene
gouerneth the will,for they fay y it is fo endued with diuine light,that
it can giue good counfelljand fo cxcelleth in liuely force that it is able
well to gouerne. On the other lide, that fenfe is dull and blearc eyed,
that it alway creepeth on the ground,and walloweth in groffe obieds,
and neuer lifteth vp it felfe to true mlight . That the appctite,if it can
abide to obey realon , and do not yeld it felfe to fenfe to be fubducd,
is caried on to the ftudy of vertues, holdeth on the right way, and is
transformed into wilhbut if it giue it felfe fubied into the bondage of
fenfe , it is by it corrupted and perucrtcd , fo that it degendreth into
luft. And whereas by their opinion there do fit in the foule thofe po-
wers that I haue fpoken of before , vnderlhnding , fenfe , appetite or
willj which word will is now more commonly v{ed,rhey fay that vn-
derftanding is endued with reafon, the beftgouerneflc toward good'
and blcffed hfe , fo that it do hold it felfe within his ownc excellence,
and (hew forth the force that is naturally giuen it . But that infcriour
motion of it, which is called fenfe , wherewith man is drawen to cr-
rour & deceitCjthey fay to be fuch, that it may be tamed with the rod
of reafon, and by litle and htle be vanquiihed . They place will in the
middeft bctwene reafon and fenfe, as a thing at her ownc oidcring,&
hauinge liberty whether it hft to obey to reafon, or giue forth it felfe
to be rauifhed by fenfe. <• o
5 Sometime in decde they do not deny , being ouercomc by very
experience, how hardly man ftablifheth reafon to raigneas qjiecnc
within himfelfe, while fomtimc he is tickled with intifemcnts of pic3«
iiircs, fomctimc deceiued with filfc iemblance of good things, fome-
time
God the Rcdemcr. Lib.2 . ^4
lime importunatly ftrickcn with immoderate afFedions,and violcnt-
Jy haled out of the way as it were with ropes or firings of finowtfS,a$
Plato fayth. For which reafon Cicero fay th,thac thetc fparkcs giuen d^ i^g.,
by nature, are with peruerfe opinions & euiU mancrs byandby quen- i6. li. i,
died : But when fuch difeafes haue once gotten places m the mmdes Tu.quc
of men : they graunt that they do more outragioufly oucrflow , than '^^
that they eafcly maybe reftrayned : and they ftickc not to compare
them to wiide horfes which throwing away reafon as it were calling
the Chariot driuen,do range vnrulely and without meafure. But this
they make no queftion ofjthat vertues and vices are in our owne po-
wer . For if(fay they) it be in our choife to do this or that, then is it . . .
alfo in our choife not to do. Now if it be in oar choife not to do,then li.j'ca.c
is It alfo to do,but of free choife we feeme to do thofc things that wc
do, and to forbearc thofc things that wc forbcare. Thcrforc if we do
any good thinge when we hft, we may likewife leaue it vndone : if wc
do any euell, we may alfo efchue the fame . Yet fome of them haue Seneca*
but ft forth into fo great licentioufnefle , that they haue bofted that it
is in deede Gods gift that we hue , but our owne that we hue well &
hoiily . And thence commeth that -faying of Cicero in the pcrfon of Dcnatn
Cocta:becaufe euery man himfelfe gctteth vertuc to himfelfe^thcre- ^*'hb.|
fore neuer any of the wife men did thanke God for it. For(fayth he)
for vertue we be praifed,& in vertue v/e glory,which fhould not be if
it were the gift of God,and not ofour felues. And a litle after. This is
the iudgemenc of al men that fortune is to be asked of God,but wif-
dom to be taken of himfelfe . This therfore is the fumme of the opi-
nion of all the PhilofopherSjthat the reafon of mans vnderftanding is
fufficient for right gouernancerthat Will being fubied toit,is in dedc
mouedby Scnfeto euill thinges . Buteucnas it hath free cledion,
fo can it not be ftopped, but that it follow reafon for her guide in aU
things.
4 Among the Ecclefiafticall wryters, albeit there haue bin none
that did not acknowledge both that the foundnefle of reafon in man
hath bin fore wounded by finnc , and his will exceedingly entangled
with peruerfe dcfircs,yct many of them haue to much afTenied to the
Philofophers : of which the auncient , as I thinke , did fo much ad-
uaunce the flrength of man,vpon this con(ideration,lcft if they fhould
haue expreffely confcfTcd his weakeneflTejfirft they fhould haue made
the Philofophers, with whom they the contended, to laugh at them:
and then leaft they fhould giue to the flefh ; which of it felfe was dull
to goodncfTcja new occafion offlouthfulnes .Therefore bccaufe they
wouide not tcache any thinge diat were an iibfurdity in the common
Cap.2. Of the knowledge of
iiidgement of men , their ftudy was to make the dodrine of the Scri-
pture halfe to agree with the teachings of the Philofophers . But that
they principally regarded that fccond point , not to make place for
Ho.dc flouthrulneire,appeareth by their owne words. Chryfoftome hath in
frodi- Qne place : Bccaufe God hath put both good and euill thingcs in our
1 *daE ^"^^^ power,hc hath giucn vs Freedome of eledion,and he withhol-
Chryf. ^^^^ "Of y vnwiUingjbut embraceth the willing. Agayne,Oftentimes
in Gen. he that is euili , if he will > is turned into good , and he that is good
horn. 1 8 by flouthfullnes falleth and becometh euill , bccaufe God made our
iiom,s% nature to haue free will , and he layeth not neceflity vpon V5,but gi- ,
uing conuenienc remedies , fufFreth all to lye in the minde of the pa-
cient. Againe, As vnleffe we be holpen by the grace of God , we can
ncuer do any thing well : fo vnleflc we bring that which is our ovrne,
we can not obtaine the fauour of God. And he had faid beforeithac ic
fliould not be all of Gods helpCjbut we muft alfo bring fomwhat. And
this is commonly a familiar word with him, let vs bring that which is
Dialoe ©"•'SjGod wil fupply the reft. Wherwith agreeih that which Hierom
3 .cocra fay eth, that it is our part to beginne, but Gods to make an ende : our
Felagiu parte to offer what we can,his to fulfil what we can not. You fee novir
thatinthefe fayinges they gaue to man towarde the ftudy of vertue
more than was mectc , becaul'e they thought that they could not o-
thcrwife awake the duUnefle that was naturally in v$ , but if they did
proue that in it onely we finned. With what apt handeling they haue
don the famcwe (hall after fe. Surely that the fayings which we haue
rchearfed are moft falfe , fhall byandby appeare. Now alrhough the
Grecians more than othcrj & among them principally Chryfoftome
haue pafled meafure in aduauncing the power of mans willjyet all the
old wryters, except Auguftine, do in this point fo either vary,or wa-
«er,or fpeake doutcfully,that in manner no certainty can be gathered
of their wry tings. Therefore we will not tary vpon exa<5l reckcning of
euery one of their fayinges, but heare and there we will touch out of
euery one of them (b much as the playne declaration of the matter
fhall feeme to require . As for them that followed after, while euery
one for himfelfe fought praife of witte, in defending of mans nature,
they fell continually by little and little one after an other into worfe
and worfe , till it came fo farre, that man was commonly thought to
be corrupted only in his fenfuall parte,and to haue reafon altogether,
and will for the more parte vncorrupted. In the meane time this flew
about in all mens mouthes , that the naturall gifrs were corrupted in
man , and the fupernaturall were taken away , But to what meaning
chat tended>fcarfely the hundreth man did euen (lightly vnderftande.
GodthcRcdemcr. Lib.2. 95
As For my parte,if I would plainely (hew of what forte is the corrup-
tion of nature,! could be eafely contented with thefe words . But it is
much matcriall that it be heedefuliy weycd what a man , being in all
partes of his nature corrupted and fpoiled of his fupcmaturall giftes,
is able 10 do. They therefore which boaftcdthemfelues to be the
Difciples of Chrift, fpake of this matter to much hke Philofo-
phers. For the name of Freewill ftill rcmayned amonge the LatmeSy
as if man had ftill abiden in vncorrupted ftate. AndthtGrecians were
not aftiamcd to vfc the worde much more arrogantly : For they cal-
led it Autexoufion,that is to fay of her ownc power,as if man had the
power of himfelfe.Becaufe therefore alljCuen to the common people,
had receiued this principle , that man was endued with Free will, and
many of them that would fceme excellent , can not tell how farrc it
extendcth:firft let vs fearch out the force of the word it felfe, and the
let vs proceede on by the fimplicity of the Scripture , to fhewe what
man is able to do of his ownc nature, toward good or euill.What Frc
will is , where as it is a word commonly found in all mens wrytingcs,
yet few haue defined. Yet it femeth that Origcn rehcarfed that thing ' j^.' .
whereof they were all agreed, when he fayd, that it is a power ofrea- ^a,,
fon to difcerne good or euell , and a power of will to choofe either of
them.And Auguftine varfeth not from him, when he teacheth that ic
is a power of reafon and will,whereby good is chofcn while grace affi-
fteth , and euill when grace ceaffeth. Bemarde, while he meaneth to
fpeake more futrclly, fpeaketh more darkely, which fayeth, that it is
a confent by reafon of the liberty of will that can not be loft,and the
iudgcment of reafon that can not be auoyded. And the definition
of Anfelmus is not familiar enough, which fayth that it is a power to
kcpe vprightneire for it felfe. Therefore Peter Lorobardc and the o- lib.t,
ther Schoolemen ,hauc rather embraced Auguftines definition, be- D:ii»4
caufe it both was playner &did not exclude the grace of God, with-
out the which they fawe that Will was not fufficient for it felfe . But
they bring alfo of their owne fuch thinges as they thought either to
be bettcr,or to feruc for playner declaration.Firft,they agree that the
name of Arbitriumjthat is free c!ioife,is rather to be referred to rea-
fon , whofe parte is to difcerne betwcne good and Euill thinges : and
the adiediue Free , pertayneth properly to wil, which may be turned /
to either of both . Wherefore lith Ereedome properly belongcth to
wJlljThomas fayth that it would very well agree,if Free will be called *^^*
a power of chofing , which being mixt of vnderftanding and appe- j, ^^^^
titc , doth more encline to appetite . Nowe haue we m what thinges j,
they teach that the power of Free will confifteth, that \s to fay>in rca-
Cap. 2. Of theknowlcdgc of
fon and will. Nowc remayneth that we fliortiy fee howc much thcjr
giue to cither parte.
5 They arc commonly wont to make fubied to the free determi-
nation of man, thingcs meane, that is which belong not to dw kmg.
dom of God : but ihey do refcrre true righteournefle to the fpeciall
Amb.li. grace ol God and fpirituall rcgeneration.WhJch shing while the au-
i.cap.2. thor of the booke Of the calling of the Gentiles meancth to {liew,he
reckencth vp three fortes of Willes,the firfi Sen(niue,the ff cond Na-
lurall, rhe third Spirituail, of which he fayth, that man hath rhe Hrft
two at his owne liberty ,the laft is the workc of the holy ghoft in man. i
Which whether it be true or nojfhall be entreated in place fit for it,
for now my purpofe is but fhortly to rehcarfe the opinions of other,
and not to confute them.Herby it cometh to palfe,that when wryterj
fpeake of free will , they principally feeke not what it is able to do to
ciuile or outward domgs, but what it can do to the obedience of the
law of God . Which later point 1 thinke fo to be the principall, that
yet I thinke the other is not to be negleded . Of which meanin g I
truftjl (hall (liew a good reafon.There hath bin a diftindion receiued
in SchoolfcSjthat reckcneth vp three fortes of freedomes,the firft fro
neceffity, the fccond from (innc, the third from mi fery. Of which
fhc fitll fo naturally fticketh fail in man , that it can by no meane be
taken away:the other two are loft by Imne.This diftmdion I willing-
ly rccctue, fauing that there ncceflity is wrongfully confounded with
compullion : betwene which two how much difference there is,and
how necefiary that difference is to be confidered , fhall appeare in an
other place.
6 If this be receiued , then (hall it be out of controuerfie that man
hath not free will to do good workes, vnlefTe he be holpen by grace,
and that by fpeciall grace , which is giuen to the onely eled by rege-
neration. Fori do not paffevponthefephrenetike men, which bab-
ble that grace is offered generally and without difference . But this is
not yet made plaync,whether he be altogether depriucd of power to
do wcUjOr whether he haue yet fomc power, although it be but htlc
and weakcjwhich by it fclfe in dedc can do nothing , but by helpc of
grace doth alfo her parte. While the Maifter of the Sentences goeth
VJ'^2^* about to make that playne, hefayeth there arc two fortes of grace
ncceffary for vs , whereby we may be made meete to do a good
woike : the one they call a Working grace , whereby we cffedual-
ly will to do good : the other a Together working grace , which foU
lowcth good will in helping it . In which diuifion this I miflikc , that
while he giueth to the grace of God an effeduall defire of good , he
fccrctly
GodtheRcdcmer. Lib.2, ^6
fccretly fiicwcth bis mcaninge that man already of his ownc naiurc,
after a certaine manner, deiireth good though vneffedually. As Ber-
nacdc affirming that good will is in deedc the worke of God , yet this
he eraunteih to man^that of his owne motion he defircth chat good
wilLSut this is farrc from the meaning of Auguftine, from whom yet
Lombard would (ccmc to hauc borowcd this diuilion.In the fccoiid
part of Uie diuifi6,(he doutfulnes of fpeach oiFendcih mc,which hath
bred a wrong expofition. For they thought that we do therfore work
together with the Seconde grace of God , becaufe u licth in our po-
wer,cither to make voydc the Firft grace by lefuling it,or to confirm
it by obedierly following it.Whcras the author of the booke Ofthe AmbJL
calhng ofthe Gentiles , doth thus exprefiTe it , that it is free for them z.cap^
that vfc the iudgement of rcafon , to deparie from grace,thac it may
be worthy rewarde not to haue departed , and that the thing which
could not be done but by the working together of the holy Glioft,
may be imputed to their mcrites,by whofe wil it was poflTible to haue
not bin done . Thcfe two thingcs I had will to note by the way, that
nowe, reader, thou maift fee howe much I diffent from the founded
forte ofthe Schoolemen. For I do much farther differ from the later
Sophifters, euen fo much as they be farther gone from the auncienc
time.But yet fomewhat,after fuch a forte as it is, we perceaue by this
diuifion, after what manncj they haue giucn Free will to man. For at ^ji,^^ ^^
length Lombard fayth , that we haue not free will therefore, becaufe dilLzj.
we arc alike able cither to do or to thmkc good and euill , but onely
that wc arc free from compulfion : which frecdomc is not hindered,
although we be pcruerfc and the bondmen of (inne, and can do no>
tliing but (inn^.
7 Thcrefore,man Hialbe fayd to haue free will after this rorte,not
becaufe he hath a free choife as well of good as of cuil,but becaufe he
doth cuiU by Will , and not by compulfion . That is very well fayd:
but to what purpofe was it to garnilTi fo fmale a matter with lb proud
a title ? A goodly liberty forfooth , if man be not compelled to fcruc
finnc: fo is he yet a willing fcruauni that his will is holden faft boundc
with the fetters of linne . Trucly I do abhorre ftriuinge about
wordes wherewith the Church is vaynely wearied : but I thinke that
fuch wordes arc with great religious carefujlneffc to be taken hcedc
of,which found of any abfurdity, fpecially where the errour is hurtc-
full . Howe fewc I pray you , arc there , which when they hearc that
Free will IS afligsed to man,do notbyandby conccaue,that he is lord
both of his owne mindc and will , and that he is able of himfelfe to
turnc himfelfe to whether parte hi will ? But fomc one will fay:
Cap. 2. Or the knowledge or
this periil fhalbe taken away^if rhe people be diligently warned of the
meaning of it.But rather forafmuch as the wit of man is naturally bet
to fal(ity,he will fooner conceiue an errour out of one liilc wordjthan
a trueih out of a long tale. Of which thing we haue a more certainc
experience in this very word, than is to be wifhcd.For omitting y ex-
po(iti6 of the old wrytcrs,all they in maner that came after,while they
fticke vpon the naturall (ignification of the wordjhaue bin caried in-
to a truft of themfelues that bringeih them to deftrudion.
8 But if the authority of the fathers do moue vs, they haue in dedc
cotinaally the word in their month;but they do withall declarc,how
1\\fj^ much they efteme the vfe of it. Firft of all Auguftine, which fticketh^
contra not lo call u Eonde wili.ln one place he is angry with them that de-
lul. nie free will but hedeclarethhis chiefe reafon why , whenhefayth
Ho'Ti.5 J onely,Lct not any man be fo bold to deny the freedom of wil,that he
Ad A- 6^ about to exculc finne . But furely in an other place he confelTeth,
naft. ca that the will of man is not free without the holy Ghoftjforafmuch as
44« it IS fubied to luftes that do binde and conquere it. AgainCjthat v/hen
Dc per- ^jll was ouercome with finne whereinto it fell, nature began to want
luft.En- ffecdome . Againe , that man hauing ill vCcd his free will , loft both
chir. ad himfelfe and it. Againc,free will is become captiue,that it can do no-
Lau.ca thing toward rightcoufnes. Againe, that it can not be free,which the
' j'r grace of jGod hath not madefree.Againe,thaty iuftice of God is not
nifli°j' ^"^^^J^'^ when the lawc commaundeth , and man doth of hisownc
cap. 8. ftrength , but when the holy Ghoft helpeth , and mans willnot free,
lbi.c.7. but made free by God , obeyeth. And of all ihefe thinges he {hortly
Ad Bo - lendereth a caufe, when in an other place he wrytcth,that man recci-
fii . '. I • yg^i great force of free will when he was created , but he loft it by fin-
Ad Bo- n'"g' Therefore in an other place,after that he had {hewed that free
nif.Ii. J. will is ftablilhed by grace, he fliarply inueyeth againft them that take
cap.?, it vpon them without grace.Why tIierefore(fayth he) dare wretched
P.^ ^^'^" men either be proud of free will before that they be made free , or of
fg^ ^ ' their owhe ftrength if they be already made free ? And they markc
Dc fpi- notthatinthe very name of free will, is mention of freedome. But
ritu & where the fpirit of the Lord is,there is freedome. If then they be the
Iitcra. bondmen of finnc,why do they boaft them of free will?For of whom
a Cor ? •* "^*'" '^ ouercome, to him he is made bond.But if they be made free,
S. why do they boaft them as of their owne worke ? Are they fo fi-ee,
loh.i 5. that they will not be his bondfcruantes, which fay th: Without me ye
5- can do nothing ? Befide that alfo in an other place he fecmeth fpor-
TeV^ tingly to mockc at the vfe of that worde, when he fayd, that will was
jra.c.ij in decdc freejbut not made frec,ffee torighteoufnefle.butthe bond-
fcruaunc
vjoa cne rvcciemcr. 1-10.2. ^7
feruauntoffinne. Which faying in an other place he repcatcth and
expoundeth, that man is not free from righreoufncffe, but by choifc
of will,and from finne he is not free but by gract of the Sauiour. He
that doth teftific,tbat the freedomc of man is nothing elft but a free-
making or manumiflion from righteoufnes,feemeth trimly to mockc
at the vainc name thereof. Therefore if any man will permit the vfe
of this word with no euil fignification,he fliallnot be troubled by me
forfodoinge. But becaufe I thinke it can not be kept without great
pcril,& ihatitfhould tnrne to a great benefit to the church,jf jt were
aboliilied;neither will I my fclfc vfe it, and I would wifh other,if they
aske me counfcil,to forbcare it.
9 I may (ecme to haue brought a great prciudicc againft my fclfe,
which h^ue confeffed, thai all the ccdefiafticall wryters, except Au-
guftmc , haue fpoken fo doutfully or diuerfly in this matter , that no
certaynety can be had out of their wrytingcs. For fome will To con-
iiruethis, that I meant therefore to thruft them from giuinge any
voice herein,becaufe they arc all againft mc. As for me, I meant it to
no other end but this, that I ilmply & in good faith would haue god-
ly wittes prouided for,which if they wayte vpon thofe mens opinion
in this poynt, they ihali alway wauer vncertayne . Infuch forte do
they fomctime teach, man being fpoyled of all ftrcngth of freewill ,to
flee to grace onely : fometime they I'urnifh or feeme to furnifh him
with his owne armour.But it is not hard to make appeare,thai in fuch
doutfulnefle of fpeech , they nothing , or very litle eftec minge mans
ftrength haue giuen the praife of all good thingcs to the holy Ghoft,
if I here recite certaine fentences of theirs » whereby that is playncly
taught. For what oieaneth that faying of Cyprian, which Auguftine Dc pre-
fo oft repeatcthjthatweoughtto gloryofnothing, becaufe we haue ^.^^'"*
nothing of our owne, but that man wholely defpoyled in himfclfe, san^o^
may learne to Ivng all vpon God- What meaneth that faying of rii.li. 4.
Auguftine and Eucherius, when they expound,that Chiift is the tree Aug. m
of hfe,to whom he that reacheth his hand,{hal hue? and that the tree ^*"'
of knowledge of good and euill,is the free choife of wilI,wherof who
fo taftcth , forfaking the grace of God, he fhall dye ? What meaneth Hom.in
thatof Chryfoftome, that cuery man is naturally not onely a (inner, aducc.
but ahb altogether finne ? If we haue no good thing of our owne ; If
man fro top to toe Ije altooetbcr linne : if it be not lawfull to attempt
howe much the power of free will is able to do,howe then may it be
lawfull to parte the prayfc of a good worke betwenc God and man ? I
could rchearfe of this Con very many fayings out of other, but \ca{\ a-
ny man fhould cauilljthat I choofe out thofe things onely that make
N
Cap,
.2, Of the knowledge of
for my puipofe ^ and do craftily leaue out fuch things as make againft
me , therefore 1 do forbeare fuch rehcarfall . Yet this I dare affirme,
howfoeuer they be fomtime to bufie in aduauncing free will,that this
yet was their purpofed marke , to teach man being altogether turned
away from truft of his owne power,tohauc his ftrength repofed in
God alone. Now come I to the (impic fetiing forth of the trueth^in
conlidering the nature of man.
lo But I am here conftrayned to repeate that , which in the be-
ginninge of this chapter, Ifpakeby way of preface. Asanymanis
moftdifcouraged andthfowcn downe with ccnfciencc of his owne
mifcry, needioefle, nakedncfTc and fliamc , fo hath he belt profited in
knowledge of himfelfe.For there is no danger to be feared,leafi man
will take to much from himfclfc, fo that he learne,that what he wan-
teth is to be recouercd in God , but to himfdfe he can take nothing
more than his owne right>be it ncuer fo htle,but that he fliall dcftroy
himfelfe with vaine conHdencc, and conueyingthe honor of God to
himfelfe, become giliy of haynous facrilege. And truely fo oft as this
lult inuadeth our minde,that we dcfire to haue fomwhat of our own,
which may reft in our felues rather than in God,Iet vs know that this
thought is miniftred vs by no other counfcller , but by him that pcr-
fwaded our firft paremes , to haue a will to be like vnto Gods , k no-
wing both good and euill . If it be the word of the deuill chat raifeth
vp man in himfelfe , let vs giue no place vnto itjvnlefle we lift to take
counfell of our enemy. It is pleafaunt in deede/or a man to haue fo
much ftregth of his ovvne,that he may reft in himfelfe.But that we be
not allured to this vaine affiance, let fo many fore fcntences make vs
afraid,by which we be throwen downeras are,Cur(ed is he which tru-
Icr.17. 5 fteth in ma, & fettcth fle(h to be his armc. Againcthat God hath not
IHa. 147 pleafure in the ftrength of a hqrfejneither dehreth in the legs of man,
'°' butdehteth in them that fearehim,& attend vpon his mercy.Againe,
Eia.40' ^^^^ jj jj j^g which giucthftrengih vnto him tharfaynteth , and vnto
him that hath no ftrcngrh , he encreafeth power , tacn the yong men
{hall faint and be weary, and the yong men Hi^ll ftumblc and fall, but
they that wayte vpon the Lord, fhall renue their ftrength. All which
fayinees tend to this end , that we leanc not vpon any opinion of our
owne ftren-^th, be it ncuer fo litlc,if we meane to haue God fauonra-
Iac.4.<5. t>le vnfo v&jwhich refilleth the proude,& giuetl* grace to the humble-
And then againc,lettethefepromifcs come into our remembrance. J
will pourc out water vpon the thiiftv,& Floudes vpon the dry rjoud.
tVa.ss.i tcftific, that none arc admitted toiecciue theblcffingcs of God, but
^'^' Apainc^Allye that thirft,comc vnto the waters. Which promifes do
... . . . . . . ^ ' '^ ',but
they
God thcRedemer. Lib.2. p8
they that pyne away with feehng of their owne pouerty . And fuch
promifes are not to be pafled ouer,as is that of EfaytThou {h?.lt hauc
no morcfunnetolhincby day, neither {hall the brightncflc of the
Moone (hine vnto thee : for the Lord fhall be thine euerlalhng hght,
and the God thy glory . The Lord in deede doth not take away the
lliining of the Jsunne or Moone from his feruauntcs, but bccaule he
will himfelfc alone appeare glorious in them , he calleth their con-
fidence far away, euen from thofe thinges, that are comptcd in chcir
opinion moft excellent.
1 1 Truely , that laying of Chrifoftome hath alway exceedingely
Well pleafAlme, that the foundation of our Wifdom is humilitie:
but yet more that faying of Auguftine, As (fayth he) that fame Rhe- Horn,
thoritian beingc afkcd , what was the firfl: thingc in the rules of clo- dc perf.
qucnce , anfwered Pronunciation : and what was the ft cond , he an- ^"^nge.
fwered Pronunciation : and what was the third , he anfwered Pro- Th^"^'
nunciaiion : fo if one afke me of the rules of Chriftian religion , the
Firft , the Second, and Third time , and alwayes I would anhvcr Hu-
militie . But he meaneth not humihty , when a mnn knowinge fome
litle vertuetobe in himfelfe, abrtayneth from pride and hautinefle
of minde , but when he truely feeleth himfclfe to be fuch a one , as
hath no refuge but in humility : as in an other place hedeclareth.
Lette no man ( fayeth he ) fl.uter himfelfe : of his owne he is a de- InToan.
uill . That thinge whereby he is bleficd , he hath of God oncly. For ^001.45)
what haft thou of thine owne, but finne ? Takeaway from thee,
finne which is thine owne , for nghteoufnefle is Gods . Agayne, , j ,
why is the poflibihty of nature fo prefumed on ? it is wounded , may- >]ar.^
med , troubled and loft , it necdeth a true confelTion , and not a falfe grana.
dcfenfe. Agayne, whencuery man knoweththat in himfelfe he is <^ap. 9-.
nothing , and of himfelfe he hath no helpe , his weapons in himfelfe ^^"^^
arc broken , the warres are ceafled . But it is needful! , that all the
weapons of wickednefie be broken in funder , fhiuered m in peeces
and burnt , that thou remayne vnarmed and haue no helpe in thy
felfc . Howe much more weake thou art in thy feli'e , fo much the
more th.e Lord receiueth thee . So vpon the three fcore and tennc
Pfalme he forbiddeth vs to remember our owne righreoufnefte, that
wemiy acknowledge the righrcoufnelTeof God : and hclheweth
that God doth focommende his grace vnto vs , thatwemay knowc
our fclues to be nothing , that we ftan3 onely by the mercy of God,
when of our fclues we are nothing but euill . Lette vs not therefore
ftriue here with God for our right , as if that were wiihcrawen from
our faluaiion which isgiuento hiift'. For as our humbleneftc is his
N ij.
%^ap,2, \^r ciic Kiiuwicugc ur
hkneflc , Co the confcffion of our humblenefle hath his mercy ready
for remedy. Neither yet do I require that manne not conuinced
fhouidwillingelyycldehimfelfe : nor if he haue any power, that he
ihoulde turne his minde from it , to be fubducd vnto true humihtie.
But that layinge away the difeafe of felfeloue and defire of vido-
ry wherewith beinge blinded, heihinkcth to highly of himfclfe,
he fhould well confider himfelfc in the true lookingc giafTe of the
Scripture.
iz And the common faying which they haue borrowed out of
Auguftine pleafeth me well , that the naturall giftes were corrupted
inmanby(inne,andofthefupernaturallhe wasmadcempty. For in i
this later parte of fupernaturall giftes , tliey vnderftande as well the
light of faith as rigljteoufneflejwhich were fufficient to the atcayning
of heauenly hfe and ercrnall fehcity . Therefore banifliing himfelfe
from the Kingdome of God , he was alfo depriued of the fpirituall
giftes , wherewith he had bin furniflied to the hope of eternail falua-
tion . Whereupon followeth , that he is fo baniflied from the King-
dome of God 5 that all thinges that belong to the blefled hfe of the
fbule, are extinguifhcd m him, vntill by grace of regeneration he rc-
coucr them. Of that lorte arc fa!th,the Louc of God, charity toward
our neighbours, the ftudy of holineflfe and righteoufneffe. All thefc
thinges, becaufe Chrift reftorcth them vnto vs, are compted thingef
comming frcm an other to vs,and befide nature,and therefore we ga-
ther that they were once taken away. Againe, foundnefTc of the vn-
derftandinge minde andvpri^hinelTc of hart were then taken away
together, and this is the corruption of naturall giftes . For though
there remayne fomewhat left of vnderftanding and iudgemcnt toge-
ther with will,yet can we not fay, that our vnderftanding is found and
perfcdjwhich is both feeble and drowned in many darkencfies . And
asfcrour will, the peruerfcnefle thereof is more than fuflScicntly
knowen . Sith therefore reafon, whereby a man difcerncth bctwene
good and cuill , whereby he vnderftandcth and iudgeth, is a naturall
gift,it could not be altogether deftroicd,but it was partely weakened,
partely corruptedjfo that foule ruynes thereof appeare . In this fcnfc
, dorh lohn Tiy, that the light fhineth yet in darkcnefle,but the darkc-
*^ nefTe comprehended it not : In which wordes both thinges are
plainely expreffed , that in the peruerted anddegendrcd nature of
man,there fhine yec fomc fparkes that fhewe that he is a creature ha-
uing reafoivind that he differcth from brute beaftes,bccaufe he is en-
dued with vnderftanding : and yet that this light is clioked with great
thickenefte of ignoraunce^ that if can not eii'cvtually getce abioade.
So
GodtheKedemer. Lib.2. ^p
So Will , becaufc it is vnfeparablc from the nature of man , perifhed
not, but was bound toperuerfe defires, that it can couctnogood
thinge. This in decde is a full definition^but yet fuch as needcih to be
made playne with more vvordes . Therefore , that the order of our
tallce may procccde according to ihac firft difl:indion,wherein we di-
uided the foulc of man into vndcrftandinec and will : Ictte vs firft ex-
amuie the force of vnderftandingc . So to condemne it of perpetu-
all blindencfTe, thatamanleaue vntoit no manner of skill in any
kinde of thinges , is not onely againft the worde of God , but alfo a-
gainft the experience of common reafon . For we fee that there is
planted in man a certaync defire to fcarch out tructh , to which he
would not afpireatall, buthauing feltfome fauourtherof before.
This therefore is fome fight of mans vnderftanding , that he is natu-
rally drawen with loue of tructh , the negledinge whereof, in brute
beaftes proueth a grofle Senfe without reafon , albeit , this lule defire
fuch as It is , faynteth before it entrc the beginning of her race , be-
caufe it byandby falleth into vanity . For the wicte of man can noc
for dullnefle keepe the right way to fearch out trueth, but ftray-
eih in diuerfe erroures , and as it were gropinge in darkenefTe, often-
times ftumbleth, till at length it wander and vanifheth away, foin
feekinge trueth , it doth bewray howc vnfitte it is to feeke andfinde
trueth . And then it is fore troubled with an other vanity , that of-
tentimes itdifccrneth not thofe thinges, to the true knowledge
whereof it were expedient to benditfelfe, and therefore ittormcn-'
teth it felfe with fondc curiolity , in fearchinge out thinges fupcr-
fiuous and nothing worth : and to thinges moft ncccflary to be kno-
wen, it either taketh no heedc, or negligently or feldome tuineth,
butfurely fcarfe atany time appUethher ftudyearneftly vnto them.
Of which peruerfenefle, whereas the prophanc wryters do common-
ly complayne , it is founde , that all menne haue entangled thcm-
felues with it . Wherefore Salomon in all his Ecclefiaftes , when he
hadde gone through all thefe ftudies , in which men thinke themfcl-
ues to be very wifc^ yet he pronounceth , that they are all vayne and
trifling.
1 ^ Yet do not all trauailes of Witte fo alway become voyde, bat
that it attayneth fomewhat, fpccially when it bcndeth it ftlfe to thefe
inferiour thinges. Yea and it is not fo blockifli , but that it tafterh alfo
fome litle of the hier thinges , howefoeuer it more ncghgently apply
the fearching of them , but yet not that with like power of concea-
uingc . For when it is caried vppe aboue the compaflfe of this pre-
fcnt life , then is it principally conuinced of her ownc weakcneflc.
•' N iij.
Cap.2, Of the knowledge of
Wherefore , that we may the better fee howe farre accordinge to
the degrees of her ability it proceedcth in cueryrhingc, it is good
that I putte foorth a diftmdion . Lerte this therefore be the diftiii'-
6:ion , that there is one vnderftandinge of earthly thinges , an o-
iher of heauenly thinges . Earthly thinges I call thofe that do not
concerne God and his Kingdome, true rightcoufnefle , and the
blefledneffe of eternalji life, buthaue all their refpe^and relation
to this prefente life , and are as it were contayned within the
.boLindes thereof, tjeauenly thinges , I call the pure knowledge of
God , the order of true righteoufneffe , and che myfteriesof the
heauenly kingdome . Of the firil forte are policy , gouernaunce of i
houfehold , all handy craftes , and liberall Sciences . Of the fecond
fotte are the knowledge of God and Gods will,and the lule to frame
our hfc accordinge to it . Concerninge the firil . this we muft con-
felle , becaufe man is a creature by nature giuen to liue in companies
togetherihc is alfo by naturall inliindion bent to cherifh and to pre-r
ieruc thcfciliowcihippe of thcfe companies , therefore we fee that
jthere arc in the mindes of all men vniuerfal imprcffions ofa certaine
ciuill honcftie and order . Hereby it commeth tc pafle , that there is
jfound no man that y ndcrftandeth not , that all companies of menne
ought to be kept in order with bwes, and that conceiueth not in his
mindc the principles of thefe lawcs . Hereof commeth that fame
perpetuall conlenr, as well of all nations as ot all men vnto laweSjbe-
caufe the feedes thereof are naturally planted in all men without any
teacher or lawmaker . And I wcye not tlie diflenfions and fighiinges
,that afterward aijfe while fome defire to peruert lawe and right , the
loofe abfolutc gouernementes of kinges , that luft ftrayeth abroade
in ftecdeof right , astheeues and robbers , fome (which is a fault
more than common) thinkc that to be vniuft, which Oiher hauc
{iablifhcd for iuft : and on the other fide ftiffely fay , that to be lau-
dable, which other haue forbidden . For thefe men do not there-
.fore hate lawes , becaufe they do not knowe that lawes are good and
holy, but for that they raginge with headdyluft, do fight againft
manifert reafon , and for thcyr fanfie do abhorre that , which in
vnderftandinge of minde they allowe . The later forte of ftriuinge
is fuch , that it taketh not away the firft conceiuinge of equi-
tie . For when men do flriue amonge themfelucs , concerning^
the poyntes of lawcs, they agree together in a certayne fummc of
.equity . Wherein is proued the weakenelfe of mannes witte, which
euen then when it fcemeth to followe the right way, yet halteth and
ftaggereth, butftiU this rcmayncth true, that there isfowen in all
men
Ood the Kedemer, i.iD.2. Too
menne a cenaine fecde of politike order . And that is a large proufc,
that in the orderinge of this Ufe , no manne is voydc of the hght of
rcafon. ;
14 Nowe do foUowe the artes , both the hberall , and the handy
crafces : in learninge whereof, becaufe there isinvs alia certaync
aptnefle , in them alfo doth appeare the force of mannes witte : but
albeit , all menne be not apt to learne them all , yet is this a token
certayne enough of the common naturall power , that there is all-
moft no manne founde , whofc conceite of witte doth not in fomc
art or other fhew foorth it fclfe . Neither haue they onely a power
or facility to learne , but alfo to deuife in euery art fome newe
thinge , either to amplifie or make perfederthat which lyth bin
learned of an other that went before, which thinge , as it moued
Plato erroneoufly to teach > that fuch conceauinge is nothinge clfe,
but a callingc to remembraunce , fo by good reafon it ought to
compell vs to confefle , that the beginninge thereof is naturally
planred in the witte of man , Thcfe poyntes therefore do phyncly
telhfie, that there isgiuento men naturally an vniuerfall concei'^
uinge of rcafon and of vnderftandinge . Yet is it fo an vniuerfall bc-
nefitc, that therein euery man ought for himfelfe to acknowledge
the peculiar grace of God. To which thankcfullnefTe the creator
himfelfe doth fufficiently awake vs,when he createth natural foolcs,
in whom he maketh vs to fee with what giftes mans foule excel-
leth, if it be not endued with his hght, which is fo naturall in all
men , that it is yet altogether a free gift of his hberahty towarde c-
uery man. But the inuention and orderly teachinge of the fame
artes , or a more inwarde and excellent knowledge of them which is
proper but to a fcwe,is no perfed argument of the common concei-
uinge of witte, yet becaufe without difference ithappeneth to the
godlye and vngodlye » ic is rightfully reckened amonge naturall
giftes.
I J So oft therefore as we light vpon prophane wryters » let vs be
put in mindc by that maruelous light of trueth that (hineth in them,
that the wit of man,how much foeuer it be,peruerted and fallen from
the firft integrity , is yet ftill clothed andgarniHied with excellent
giftes of God . If we confider that the fpirite of God is the oneJy
fountayne of trueth, we will ncyther refufenor defpife the trueth
itfelfe, wherefocuer it fhall appeare, except we will difhonorably
vfe the fpirite of God : for the giftes of the holy Ghoft can no: be
(et light by , without contempt and reprbch of himfelfe. And what ?
Shall we deny that the trueth fliined to the olde Lawyers , which
N iiij.
Cap. 2 . Of the knowledge of
Iiaue fet forth Ciuilc order and Difciplinc with io great equity ? Shall
we fay that the Philofophers were bhnde both in that exquifice con-
templation,and cunning dcfcription of nature ? Shall we fay that they
had no wit,which by fettinein order the artof fpeach,haue taught vs
to fpeakc with reafon ? Shall we fay that they were madde , which in
ferting forth Phificke,hauc en^ploied their diligence for vs ? What of
all the Mathematicall fciences ? (hall we thinkc them doting crrourcs
of madde men ? no,rather we can not rcade the wry tings of the oldc
menjConcerning thefe thingcs, without great admiration of their wit.
But {h:M we thinke any thinge praif*; worthy or excellent , which we
do not reknowledge to come of God ? Lette vs be afliamcd of fo ^
great vftthankcfuUnefle, into which the Heathen Poctes fell nor,
which confcfled that both Philofophie and Lawes , and all good
arteSjWcretheinuentionsofGods. Siththenit appeareththatthcfc
men, whom the Scripture calicth naturall men, were of fo fharpe and
deepe (ightin fearchinge out of inferiour thinges, lette vs learnc
by fuch examples, howe many good thinges the Lorde hath left
to the nature of manne , after that it hath bin fpoyled of the true
Gjd.
1 6 But in the raeanc time yet let v$ not forget , tR3rtii.cre arc the
moft excellent good giftes of the fpirite of God, which for the com-
mon benefiite of mankinde he dealeth abroade to whom it plealeth
him . For i( it behoucd , that the vnderft uidinge and skill that was
required for the framingc of the tabernacle , fliould be poured into
>. J I Befeleel and Ohab by the fpirit of God,it is no maruell if the know-
« 35 iict^e otthofc thinges which are moft excellent in mans life, be fayde
to be communicated vnto vs by the fpirite of God . Neither is there
caufe why any man (hould aske , what haue the wicked to do v/ith
Gods fpirite , which are altogether eftrangcd from God. For where
it is fayd that the fpirite of God dwelleth in the faithfiiil oncly , that
is to be vnderftandedof the fpirite of findification , by the which
we are confecrate toGodhimfelfe, to be his temples : yet doth he
neuercheleflc fill, raoue and quicken all thinges with the vertue of the
fame fpirite,and thac according to the property of euery kinde which
he hath giuen to it by law of creation . If it haue bin the Lords will
that we fliould be holpen by the trauaile and feruice of the wicked in
naturall Philofophie, Dialedicke, the Mathematicall knowledges,
and other : lette vs vfe it , leaft if we neglcd the giftes of God , wil-
lingly offered in them,we fufferiuft punifhment for our flouthfuUncs.
But iealtany {houlde thinke a man to be blefled , when vnderthc
clcmentes of this world there isgraunted vnto him fo great an abi-
lity
GodtheRedcmer, Lib.2. loi
abilitic to conceiue truth , it is alio to be added that all this power to
vndeiftand , and the vndcritanding that followeth thcrof , is a vani-
{hing and tranfirorie thing before God, where there is not a ftedefaft
fundacionof truth. For Auguftine teacheth moft truely , whome (as Lib, i
wchauefaid) the M^fter of the Sentences, and the other Schole- ditt.i
men are compelled to allcnt vnro , as the free giftes were taken from
man after his fall , To thefe naturall giftes which remained , were cor-
rupted. Not that they can be defiled of themfelues in afmucli as they
come from God, but bycaufe they ceafe to be pure to a defiled man,
that he fhould haue no praife of them.
17 Let this be the fumme : that it is feen that in all mankindc it
reafon which is propre to our nature , which maketh vs to differ from
brute beaftcs, as brute beaftes do differ in fenfe from thinges without
life. For where as rhere be borne certaine naturall foolcs and idiotes,
that dcfaute obfcurcth not the general! grace of God. But rather by
fuch fight we are put in mindc^that what is left vnto our felues, ought
iuftely to be afcribed to the kindenefl'e of God , bycaufe if he had not
fpared vs, our rebellion had drawenwith it the deftrudion of our
whole nature . But wheras (bme do cxcell in Iharpencfle of concei-
uing,fome other do pafleiniudgemcntjfome haue a quicker witte to
learne this or that arte ; in this variete God fettcth forth his grace
vnto vs , that no man fhouldc claime to him felfe as his owne , that
which flowcth from Gods mere libcrahtie. For howe becomcth one
more excellent than an other , but that m common nature might ap-
pere aboue other the fpeciall grace of God, which in omitting many,
faicth openly that it is bounde to none. Befide that , God poureth in
fingular motions , according to the calling of euery man . Of which
thing we mete with many examples in the bookes of the Iudge$,wher ludtc
it is faid, that the fpiiite of the Lord clad them , whome he called to 34-
rule the people. Finally,in euery noble ade there is a fpeciall inftruc-
tion. By which reafon the ftrong men followed Saul, whofe heartes i.Sanv
the Lord had touched. And when his miniftring in the kingdomc was > 0.6,
prophecied of, Samuel faid thus: The fpirite of the Lord fhallcome , 5
vpon thee, and thou fhalt be an other man . And this was continued u.i j,
to the whole courfe of gouernement : as after it is fpoken of Dauid,
that the fpirite of the Lord came vpon him from that day forwarde.
But the fame is fpoken in an other place as touching particular mo- .
tions : yea in Homere men are faid to excell in witte,not onely as lu-
piter hath dealte to euery man , but alfo as the time required. And
truely experience teacheth, while many times fuch men ftand amaftd
as were moft (harpe and depewittcd, that the wities of men are in the
vJap72. Ut the knowledge or
hand and will of God to rule them at euery moment : for which rca-
fbn It is faid^ that he taketh witte from the wifc,that they may wander
"a.iOT out of the way. But yet in this diuerlitie we fee remaining fome mar-
,, Ices of the Image of God,which do make difference bctwene all man-
kinde and other creatures.
x8 Now is to be declared what mans reafon feeth, when it corn*
methtothckingedomeofGodandtothatfpirituall infighti which
confifteth chiefcly in three thinges:to know God,and his fatherly fa-
uour towarde vs , wherein our faluationftandcth: and the way to
frame our life according to the rule of his lawe. Both in the firft two,
and in the fecond, proprely they that arc moft witty, are blinder than
moUes.I denie not that there be here and there read in Philofophers,
concerning God, many thinges well and aptely fpoken , but yet fuch
as do alway fauour of a certaine giddy imagination . The Lord gaue
them in dcdc, as is aboue faid , a Iitde taft of his Godhead , that they
fhoulde not pretende ignoraunce to colour their vngodhnefTe : and
many times he moued them to fpcake many thinges , byconfeflion
wherof them felues might be conuinced: But they fo fawe the thmges
that they faWjthat by fuch fcyng they were not direded to the trueth,
much lefle did attaine vnto it , like as a wayfaring man in the middeft
of the feylde,for a fodaine momct, (eeth faire and wide the gliftering
of lightning in the night time , but with fuch a quickely vanifliing
(ightjthat he is foncr couercd againe with the darkenefle of the night,
than he can ftirre his fote, fo farre is it of that he can be brought into
bis way by fuch a helpe. Befide that, thofe fmall droppes of trueth,
wherwith , as it were by chaunce , they Iprincle their bookcs , with
how many and how monftruous lies are they defiled ? Finally , they
ncuer fo much as fmelled that aflbrcdncfTe of Gods good will toward
vs , without which mans witte mufl nedes be filled with infinite con-
f ufion. Therfore mans reafon neither approcheth, nor goeth toward,
nor ones diredeth fight vnto this trueth,to vnderfland who is the truQ
GodjOr what a one he will be tov/arde vs.
19 But bycaufc we being dronke with a falfe perfuafion of our
owne deepe infight,do very hardely fufFer our felues to be perfuaded,
that in matters of God it is vttcrly blinde and dull : I thinkc it fhall be
better to cotirme it by teftimonies of Scripture than by reafons.This
)h.i.4 ^^^^ ^°^" ^^T wcllteache in that place whiche I euen now alleged,
whe he writcthjthat life wa<? in God from the beginning,and the fame
life which fhoulde be the light of men , and that the Ught did fhine in
darkenelic , and the darkenefTe comprehended it not . He fheweth in
dede, that mans foule is lightened with the brightnelTe of Gods light,
fo
God the Redemer.^ Lib.2. 102
fo that it is neuer altogether without fomefmall flame, oratleaft
fome fparcle of it, but yet , that with fuch a light he comprehcndeth
not Gad. And why fo ? bycaufe mans quickenefTe of wit, as towardc
jhc knowledge of God , is but mere darkencfle . For when the holy
Ghoft callcth men darkcnefle, he at ones fpoilcth them of all abiliiie
.of fpirituall vnderftanding. Therefore he affirmtth , that the fiaithfull
which embrace Chrift, are borne not of bloude, or of the will of the lo*
ficfh,orofman,butof God. As if he fhouldefaie;fle(h is not capable ^3*
.of fo hie wifedome to conceiue God and that which is Gods , vnlefle
it be lightened with the fpiritc of God . As Chrift teftified , that this Mat.K
was a Ipeciall rcuelationofthe father, that Peter did know him. *7«
, zo If we were perfwaded of this, which ought to be out of all con-
.troucrh'e, that our nature wanteth all that, which our heaucnly father
geueth to his eled by the Ipirjte oF regeneration , then here were no
vmatter to doubte vpon. For thus fpeaketh the faithful! people in the
.Prophet : For with thee is the fountaine of hfe , and in thy light wc ^^*' J^
{hall fee light. The Apoilie ceftifieth the fame thing, when he faicth '®^
that no man can c^l lefus the Lord,but in the holy Ghoft. And lohn ,'2^
Baptift fcyngthe dulneffe of his difcjples,crieth outjthat no man can lohn 3
-rcceiue any thing, vnleffe it be geucn him from aboue . And that he *y»
meaneth by Gifce a fpeciall lUurnination, and not a common gifte of
natur.e,appererhhereby5thathe complaineih that in fomany wordes
as he had fpoken to commende Chrift to his Disciples > he preuaylcd
nothing. I fee ( fayech he ) that wordes are nothing to informe mens
n^indes concerning diuine thinges , vnlefte the Lord geue ynderftan"
dmg by his Iparitc. YcaandMofes , when he rcprocheth the people
with their forgetfulnefle , yet noteth this withall , that they can bjr
no raeanes giow wile in the myfteries of God,but by the beneHte of
God. Thyne eyes ( faieth he ) haue feene thofe grcate tokens and Deu. z
wonders, and The Lord hath not geuen thee a heart to vnderftande, **
nor eares to heare , nor eyes to fee. What fhould he exprefle more,
if he called vs blockes in conliderjng the workcs of God? Whervpon
the Lord by the Prophet promifethfora great grace, that he will icr. 24
geue the Ifraelites a heart, that they may know him:fignifiyng there- 7.
by, that mans wittc is onely fo much fpiritually wire,as it is lightened
by him . An.djthis Chrift plainely confirmed with his owne mouth,
when he fayeth that no rnan can come to him , but he to whome it ^^^^ *
(hajbe geuen from the Father. What ? is not he him felfe the liuely ^^'
Image of the Father , in whom the whole brightncfte of his glorie is
cxprcfled vnto vs ? Therefore he coulde not better fhewe what our
power 1$ to knowe God , than when he fayeth, that we haue no eyes
Cap.2, Ut the knowledge ot
to fee his Image, where it is To openly fct prelente before vs. What •
, Came he not into the earth for this purpofe , to declare his Fathers
will vnto men ? And did he not faithfully do his office ? Yes furcly.But
yet nothing is wrought by his preachingjVnlefle the inwardc Schole-
mafter, the holy Ghoft, fetopen the way to our mindes. Therefore
none come to him , but they that hauc heardc and bin taught of the
Father. What mancr way of learning and hearing is this?Euen,when
the holy Ghoft by marueilous and fingular vertue formeth the earcs
toheare, and the mindes to vndcrftandc. And leaft that flioulde feme
ftraung, he allcgeth the prophocie of Efaie, where when he promifeth
the repairing of the Church that they which (hall be gathered togc-
r«. 54. tte to faluaiion,(hall be taught of the Lord.If God there forcfheweth
V fome peculiar thing concerning his eleftes , it is cuidcnt that he fpea-
keth notof thatkinde of learning that was alfo common to the wic-
ked and vngodly . It remaineih therefore that we muft vndcrftandc it
thus , that the way into the kingdome of God is open to no man , but
to him to whom the holy Ghoft by his enlightening fhall make a new
minde. But Paulc fpeaketh moft plainely of all, which o f purpofe en*
tring into difcourfe of this matter, after he had condemned all mens
wifedome of foUie and vanitie , and vtterly brought it to naught , at
^Q^ J the laft concludeth thus : that natural] man cannot perceiue ihofe
4, things that are of the fpirite of God : they are fooliihneiTe vnto him,
and he can not vndcrftand them , bycaufe they are fpiritually itidged.
Whomc docth he call natural] ? euen him that ftaytth vpon the light
of nature. He I fay comprehendcth nothing in the fpirituallmifteries
of God.Why fo?is it bycaufe by flouthfulnefle he negledeth it ? Nay,
rather although he would irauaile neuer fo much, he can do nothing,
bycaufe forfoth they are fpirirually iudged. What meantth that ? by^
caufc being vtterly hidden from the fight of man, they are opened by
the ontly reuclaiion of the fpirire : (b that they arc rcckencd for follic
where the fpirite of God gcueth not light. Before he had auaunced
thofe thingcs that God hath prepared for them that loue him , aboue
the capacitie of eyes, cares and mindes. Yea he tcftifiwd that mans
wifcdome was as a certaine veile,wherby mans minde was kept from
.Cor.i feyng God. What meane we ? The Apoftle pronounceth , that the
o. wifedome of this worlde is made foUie by God : and fhall we forfoth
geue vnto it fharpeneffs of vnderftanding , whereby it may pearce to
the fecrete places of the hcaucnly kingdome ? Farre be fuch beafteli-
nefle from vs.
XI And fo that which here he taketh away from men, in an other
placc,in a praycr,hc geueth it to God alone. God(fayeth he) and the
fethcr
GodthcRedemcn Lib.2. 103
father of glory , gcue to you the fpirite of wifedomc and reuelation. Ephe.ii
Now thou hcareft that all wifcdom and reuelation is the gift of God. * $•
What followeth ? and lighten the eyes of your mindc. Surely if they
necde a new reuelation,the arc they blinde of themfelucs. 1 1 followeth
after: That ye may knowc what is the hope of your calling. &c.
Therefore he confcfleth , that the wittcs of men arc not capable of
(b great vnderftanding, to know their owne calling. And let not fomc
Pelagian babble here , that God doth remcdie that dulnefle or vn-
fkilfulnefle, when by the dodrine of his'wcrde he diredeth mans vn-
derftanding, whether without a guide he coulde nothauc atteined.
For Dauid had a lawe , wherein was comprehended all :he wifedomc
that may be delired, and yet not contented with that, he requircth to
haue his eyes opened, that he may confider the mifteries of the fame
lawe. By which fpeach truely he fecretly faycth, that the funne rifeth ^^* "^
irpon the earth where the wordc of God fhineth to menrbut they get * *
not much thereby , vntill he himfelfe , that is therefore called the fa- j
ther of hghtes , do geue them or open their eyes , bycaufe where fo ly,*
euer he fliiiicth not with his fpiritc,all things are poflfeffcd with darkc-
nefle. So the Apoftles were well and largely taught by the beft fcholc- j » ^
mafterryet if they had not needed the fpirite of trueth toinftrud their ,^ *
mmdes in that fame dodrine which they had hcarde before,he would
not haue bidden them loke for liim.If the thing that we afke of God,
we do thereby confcffe that we wantc : and God in that that hepro-
mifeth it vs,doth argue our neede,let no man now doubte to confcflc
that he is Co much able to vnderftandc the mifteries of God , as he is
enlightened with his grace . He that geueih to him fclfe more vnder-
ftanding, is fo much the more blinde, for that he doth not acknowc-
ledge his owne blindcnelTe.
iz No we remaincth the thirdc pointe , of knowing the rule of
well framing of hfe, which we do rightly call the knowledge of the
workes of righteoulhefle , wherein mans wit femeth to be offome-
what more fharpe fight,than in the other two beforc.For the Apoftlc
teftifieth, that the Gentiles which haue no lawe, while they do the ^*'™' *
workes of the lawe,are to themfelucs in ftede of a lawe,and do ftiewe ^*
the lawe written in their heartes,their confciences bearing them wit-
neflcjand their thoughtes accufing them within themfelues,or excu-
fing them before the iugdement of God. If the Gentiles haue righre-
oufneffe naturally grauen in their mindes , furely we can not fay tha^
we are altogether blinde in the order of life. And nothing is more co-
mon, than that man by the lawe naturall, of which the Apoftle fpea-
keth in that place , is fufticiencly inftruded to a right rule of life . Buc
Cap.2. Of the knowledge of
let vs weye to what pui'pofe this knowledge or the lawc is planteif
in men:then it {hall byandby appeare, how farre it bringeth them to-
warde the marke of reafon and truth. The fame is alfo euident by the
wordes of Paule,ifa man do marke the placing of them.He had faidc-
a iitle before , that they whiche finned in the lawe , arc Judged by the
lawe:they that haue finned without lawe,do perilh without lawe. By-
caufe this might feme vnreafonablc , that the Gentils Ihould periHi
without any ludgement going before , he byandby addeth , that their
confcjence is to them in fteade of a tawe,and thcrfore is fufficient for
their iuft damnation. Therefore the ende of the lawe naturall is, that
man may be madeinexcufable.Anditlhail be deHned not ill after ihrs
fbrtCjthat it is a knowledge of confcienee^that fuflficiently difcerneth
betwene iuft and vniuft,to take away from men the pretence of igno-
raunce,while they are proued giliy by their ownc teihmonie. Such is
the tendernefle of man lowarde him felfe,that in doino of eui]s,he al-
way turneth away his minde fo much as he maie from the fthngof
I Pro- ^^^^^' ^y which reafon it femeth that Plato was moued to thinke that
taeora, there is no finnc done but by ignorance . That in dcde were fitly fayd
of bjm, if mens hypocrifie went fo farre in hiding of vices, that the
minde might not know it felfe gilty before God. But when the finner
feking to efcneuc the iudgement emprinted in him , is now and then
drawene backe vnto it , and not fuffcred fo to winke , but that he be
compelled whether he will or no , fome time to open his eyes : it is'
Paraph, falfe^y faid that he finneth onely by ignorance. Themiftius (aith more
inlib.j. truely, which teacheth that vnderftanding is feldome deceiued : that
de ani- ^^ j^ blindenelle when it goetli any further , that is , when he comcth
^l[^ ^' downe to the fpcciall cafe. Euery man^if it be generally alked, will af-
firme,th3t manflaughter is euilkbut he that confpireth to kill his ene-
mies, deliberateth vponit,as on a good thing.The adulterer general-
ly will condemne adulterie , but in liis owne , ptiuately he will flatter
him felfe. This is ignoraunce , when a man comming to the fpeciall
cafe for getteth the rule,that he had lately agreed vpon in the general
queftion. Of which thing Auguftine difcourfeth very finely in his cx-
pohtion of the firft verfe of the Ivij. Pfalme: albeit the fame thing
is not continuall . For fometimc the fhamefulnefie of the euill deedc
foprefleth the confcience , that not deceiuing him felfe vnderfalfe
rcfemblance of a good thing , but wittingly and willingly he runneth
Me^xa intoeuill. Out of which afledion came thefe fayinges: Ifeethebet-
^P"'^ „ terand allow it,but I follow the worfe. Wherefoie,me thinke , Ari-
g"^'- '"' ftotle hath very aptely made diftindion betwene Incontinence and
c»p. j. Temperance. Where incontinence reigneth, he fayethjthat there by
reafon
God the Redemcr. Lib.2 . 1 04
rcafon of troubled affedion or paiTion,lcnowledge is taken away from
the minde , that it marketh not the euill in his owne ade , which it
generally feeth in the hkerand when the troubled aftedion is cooled,
rcpentaunce immediatly followeth. But intemperauncc is not extin-
guiflicd or broken by feeling of finne,but on the other fide obftinatc-
ly ftandeth ftill in her conceiued choife of euill.
24 Now when thou hcareft iudgement vniuerfally named in the
difterence of good and euill, thinke it not euery founde and perfcft
iudgement. For if mans heartes are furniflied with choife of iuft and
vniuftjonly to this ende,that they Oiould not prctcnde ignorance, it t$
not then nedefuU to fee the tructh in euery thing. But it is enough &
more, that they vndeiiland fo farrc that they can not efcapc away,but
being conuid by witnefle oftheir confcience, they cuen now already
beginne to tremble at the iudgemet feate of God. And if we will trie
our reafon by the lawc of God, which is the cxampler of true rightc-
oufnefle , we (hall finde how many wnycs it is blinde. Truely it attei-
neth not at all to thofe that are the chiefc thinges in the Firft table, as
of confidence in God , of geuing to him the prayfe of ftrcngth and
righteoufnefle , of caUing vpon his name, of the true keping of Sab-
bar. What foule euer , by naturall fenfe did fmcU out,that the lawful!
worfhipping of God confifteth in thefe and like thinges ? For when
prophane men will worfhippe God , although they be called away a
hundred times from their vaine trifles, yet they alway flide backe thi-
ther againe. They denie indeede that facrificcs do pleafe God , vn-
lefie there be adioyned a purenefle of minde : whereby they declare,
that they conceiue fomewhat of the fpirituall worfiiipping of God,
which yet they byandby corrupt with falfe inuentions. For it can nc-
uer be perfuaded them, that all is true that the lawe prefcribeth of it.
Shall 1 faie,that that wit cxcelleth in any (harpe vnderftanding,which
can neither of it feife be wife , nor harken to teaching ? In the com-
maundementes of the Second table it hath fome more vnderftanding,
by fo much as they came ncrer to the preferuation of ciuile felow-
fhippe among menne Albeit euen herein alfo it is founde many times
to fade. To eucry excellent nature it fcmethmcft vnreafonable, to
fufter an vniuft , and to imperious a maner of gouerning ouer them,
if by any meane he may put it away : and the iudgement of mans rea-
fon is none other > but that it is the part of a feruile and bafc courage,
'to fuffer it patiently.-and againe, the parte of an honclt and free borne
hcarte,to (hake it of. And reucngc of iniuries is reckened for no faultc
amongthePhilofophers . But the Lorde condemning that tomuch
noblenefie of courage , commaundeth his to kepe the fame patience.
Cap.2. Of the knowledge of
that IS Co ill reported among men . And in all rhe keping ofthc lawc,
our vnderftanding marketh not defireof mindeacall. For a naiurall
man fuftereth not him felfe to be brought to this , to acknowledge
the difeafes of his dcfires . The light of nature is choked vp , before
that it come to the firft cntrie of this bottomleire depth . For when
the Philofophers note immodtrat motions of minde for faulrcsjihey
meane thole moti5s that nppere and fnew forth themfelues by grolTc
lokcnsjbut they make no accompt of thofe euill defires that do gent-
ly tickle the mifide.
25 Wherfore, as Plato was worthyly founde fault withall before,
for that he imputed all finnes to ignoraunce , fo is their opinion to be '
leiefted , which teach that purpofed malice and frowardneffe is vfed
in all Hnnes . For we ^ndc it to much by experience , how oft we fall
with our good intent. Ourreafon is ouerwhelmed with fo many
fortes of being deceyucd, is fubied to fo many errours , ftombleth at
fo many ftayes , is entangled with fo many ftrcightes , that it is farre
from fure diredmg. But how httle it is eftemed before the Lord in all
j.Cor. partes of our life, Paule fhe wc th when he fayeth, that we are not fuf-
3*5' ficient to thinke any thing of our felueSjas of our felues. He fpeaketh
not of will or affedion , but he taketh al(b this away from vs, that wc
fhoulde not thinke that it can come inourmindes how any thing is
to be done well. Is our diligence, infight, vndcrftanding,and headc (b
corrupted , that it can dcuife or thinke vpon nothing that is right be-
fore the Lord ? that femetb to harde to vs , that do vnwillingly fuffcr
our felues to be fpoyled of the fharpencfle of reafon , which we ac-
compt a moft precious gift. But to the holy Ghoft it femeth moft full
ofequitie, which knoweth that all the thoughtes of wifemenarc
Pfa. ^4. vainerand which pronounceth plainly , that all the inuention of mans
"' heart is onely euill . If all that our witte conceiued , deuifeth vpon,
Q - g purpofeth and goeth about, is alway euill, how can it come in our
I. and n^Jndc to purpofe that which pleafeth God, to whom onely holyneffc
8.21. and rightecufnefTc is acceptable ? So is it to be feen , that the reafon
of our minde , which way fo euer it turne it felfe , is miferably fubied
pfa.!!^. to vanitie. Dauid knew this wcakencffe in him felfe, when he prayed
J 4» to haue vnderftanding gcuen him, to learne the Lordes commaunde-
mentes aright. For he fecretly fayeth therein, that his owne wit fuf-
ficcth him not, which defireth to haue a new geuen him. And that he
doth not onely once,but almoft ten times, in one Pf3lme,he repeteth
the fame prayer , By which repeting he priuely declareth , with how ^
great neede he is driuen to pray it . And that which he prayeth for
Phil.1.4 bimfelfc alone,Pauk cQmmonly vfcth to pray for the Churches. We
ceafe
GodtheRedcmer. Lib.2. 105
ccafe not (fayeth he) to pray for you, and to dcfirc that yc may be fil^ Col. i .
led with the knowledge of God in all wifcdome and fpiriruall vndcr-
ftanding,that yc may walkc worthily of God.&cBut fo oft as he ma-
Jccth that thing the good gift of God , let vs remember that he doth
withall teftifie.that it heth not in mans power. And Auguftine fo farrc j^ j
acknowledged this defaulte of reafon to vnderftad rhofe thinges that 2. De
are of God , that he thinketh the grace of illumination to be no iei3'c pcccat
neceflarie for our mindes , than the light of the funne is for our eyes. ^^^-^
And not content with that,he addcth a corredio of that, fayino,that ^^^' '
we lift vp our eyes to fee the light:but the eyes of our minde lie fhut,
vnlefle the Lorde open them. And the Scripture teacheththat our
mindes are not cnlightned one day alone, that they may afterward fee
by themfeluesifor that which I eucn now alleged out of Paule,belon-
gcth to continuall procedingcs and encreafinges. And this doth Da- pfa.nj
uid expreffcly fet out in theic wordes : With my whole harre I haue » o.
fought thee, make me not to ftray from thy commaundementes For
when he had bene rcgcncrated,and had not flenderly profited in true
Godhnefle,yct he confeflethjthat for euery moment he needcth con-
tinuall diredion , leaft he (hoiilde fwarue from the knowledge wher-
with he is enducd.Therefore,in an otiier place he prayeth to haue the p^ .
right fpirire renued , which -he had loft by his owne faulte , becaufe it j ,]
belongeth to the fame God to reftore vnto vs the fame thing being
loft for a time,which himfelfe gaue at the beginning.
z6 Now is will to be examined, wherin ftandeth the cheefe libcr-
tie of free choife,for it hath bene already fenc,that choife doth rather
belong to will, than to vnderftanding. Firft,that this thing which the
Philofophers haue taught,and is receiued with common cofent, that
is , that all thinges by naturall inftin^ion define that which is good,
may not feemc to belog to the vprightnefTe of mans will:Let vs marke
that the force of free will, is not to be confidered in fuch appetite 3 as
rather prbcedeth of the inclination of the eflenccthan of the aduife-
ment of the vnderftanding minde . For eucn the fcholcmen do con-
{es , that free will hath no adion , but when reafon turneth it felfe 10
obiedes, wherby they mean that the obied of appetite muft be fuch,
as may be fubied to choife , and go before deliberation , which pre-
pareth the way for choife. And truely,if a man cofider what is the na-
turall defire of good in man , he ftiall finde that it is common to him
withbeaftes. For they alfo dcfirc to be well, and when anyfliewof
good appcarcth that moueth their fcnfcjthcy follow it. But man dorh
neither chofc by reafon, that he may follow with diligence that thing
vrhich is in dcedc good for him , according to die excellence of his
O
Cap.2. Ofthe knowledge of
immortall nature,nor taketh realbn to cOufel,nor bendcth his minde,
but wirhouc reaion,without counfelljlike a beaft, followeth the incli-
nation of nature. This therefore maketh nothing for the frcedomc of
will, if a ma by fenfe of nature be caryed to defire that which is good:
but this is requifite , that he difcerne good by right reafon ^ and when
he hath knowene ir, that he chofe it, and whe he hath chofen it, that
he follow it . But Icaft any man fhoulde doubt , there is to be noted a
double fophifticall argumer.For appetite ii not here called the proper
maner of will , but a naturall inclination : and good is called not as of
vertue or iufticCjbut of eftate, as we fay. This man is well,or in good
cafe: Finally , although a man do neuer fo much defire to attaine that ^
is 2ood, yet he followeth it not . As there is no man to whom cter-
nall bleiredneflfe is not pleafanr, yet is there none that afpireth vnto it,
but by the mouing of the holy Ghoft. VVherfore,fith the naturall de-
fire in men. to be wcll,maketh nothing to proue the frcdomc of will,
no more than in tnc tals and ftones,doth the affedion inclining to the
perfedion of their fubftjnccil^c vs conlider in other ihingcs, whether
Will be To infeded and corrupted in all partes,ihat it cngeadrcth no-
thing b'-it cuill : or whether it kepcth ftill any parccll vnhurte , from
whence do grow good delires.
27 They that do attribute to the firft grace of God , that we will
cffeduilly,feme on the other fide to fay fccretely, that there is in the
foule a power of it f^lfe to afpire to good , but it is fo weake , that it
cannot growc to a perfede affldion, or raifc vp any cndcuour. And
there is no doutc that the fcholemen haue commonly embraced this
opinion , or which was borowcd by Origen and ccrtaine of the oldc
writers: forfomuchasthey are wonce toconfider man io purcna-
« turall thmges, (as they termc it ) fuch a one as the Apoftle defcribcth
, c * * him in thefe wordcs. I do not the good that I would, but the cuifl that
I woulde notjthat I do.To will is prefent vnto mc,but to pcrformc it,
I finde not . But after this maner is tlic difcours that Paule there fol-
lov;eth , altogether wrongfully peruerred. For he entrcatcth of the
Chriftian wraftling ( which he lliortly toucbeih to the Galathians )
^ * ^* which the faithfull continually fele within thcmfelueSjin the battel of
the flefii and the fpirite. But the fpirite is not of nature, but of regene-
ration. And that the Apoftle doth there, fpeake of the regenerate, ap-
pearcth by this,th3t whe he had faid, that there dwelleth no goodnefTe
in him,hc addeth an expofition , that he meancth it of his fltfli . And
therefore he faith , that it is not he that doth the euiU , but finne that
dwelleth in hrm. What meaneth this corrcdion in mcj that is, in my
fleih ? Euen as much as if he had faid thus : God dwelleth not in me of
my
GodthcRedemer. Lib.2. 106
my fclfe, for there is no good to be founde in my flefh.Hercvpon tol-
lovvcch that manner of excufe; I my ielfe do not the cuill, but finnc
thatdwellethinme. Which excufe belongeth onely to the regene-
rate, which do with the cheefc parte of their foulc tende vnto good.
Nowe, the conclufion that is adioyncd after, dcclareth all this matter
cuidently. I am deliied (faith he) with the lawc , according to the in-
wardeman. But I fee an other lawe in my members, fighting againft ^°^'
the law of my mind.Who hnth fuch a ftriuinginhimfelfcjbut he that
being regenerate by the fpiriic of God , caricth the leaiiinges of his
flcfhc about with him ? Therefore Auguftinc, whereas once he had njf j/jj
thoughti that that had bene fpoken of the nature of man , reuoked c^p. i
hisexpofitionasfalfe, and ill agreing together. And trucly,if wc Et in.
alowe this, that men without grace haue fomc morions to gooci,*^*^*'^^
though they be butfmall, what (hall weaunfwere to the Apoftle ^ q^
which (aith, that we are not fufficicnt fo much as to thinke any good? 3.' 5.
What (hall we aunfwere to the Lorde that pronounccth by Mofcs, Gen. I
that cueryinnention of mans hcartc is onely euill. Wh<*rcfore , fith **•
they haue ftumbled by falfe taking of one place, there is no caufe why
we ftioulde ftaye vpon their judgement. Let rather this faying of lohn.l
Chrift preuaile. He that doth finne, is the feruaunt of finnc . We are 3 4«
all finners by nature, therefore we be all holden vnderthc yoke of
finne . Nowe if whole manne be fubieft to the dominion of (inne,
thenmuftirncedcsbe, thatthe will it felfe which isthechiefe feate
thereof, be bounde fafte with moft ftreight bondes . For othcrwife
the faying of Paule woulde not ftandc together, chat it is God which ^"'^•*
worketh will in vs, if any will did go before the grace of the holy
Ghoft . Away therefore with all that many haue iriflingly fpoken
concerning j)reparation . For although fometime the faithfull do
prayc to haue their hearte formed to the obedience of thelawe, as
Dauid doth in many places : yet it is to be noted, that euen that defirc
of praying is from God . Which we may gather of his wordcs , for *' ^
whehe wifhethtohaueacleaneheaitc created within him,furely he
takeih not on him ftlfe the beginning of creation . Therefore let ra-
ther this faying of Auguftinc haue place with vs : God will preuent ?-*Y'
thee in all thinges ; And fometime preuent thou his wrath . Howe ? ftoli Sc
Confeffe that thou haft all thefe thinges of God that what fo eucr 10.
good thou hafte, is of him : what foeuer euill, it is of thy felfe. And a
little after. Nothing is ours but iinne.
O ij.
Cap.3. Of the knowledge or
Thc^iij. Chapter.
That out tf the corrupt natmt of man procedeth nothing but dantnablt,
BVc man can not be any way better knowcne in cither part of
his foule , than if he come forth with his titles wherewith the
Scripture doth fet him out . If he be painted whole in thcfe
oh.i.6 wordcs of Chrift, That which is borne of flefh , is flcfli : as it
is ea(y to proue , then is he proued to be a very miferable creature.
,^ o For the afFedion of the flefh , as the Apoftle witnefTeth , is death, for
;, ' * afmuch as it is cnimitie againft God , and fo is not fubied, nor can be
fubied to the lawc of God. Is flefli fo peruerfe,that with all her af-
fedion fhe continually vfeth enimitie againft God ? that (he can not
agree with the righteoufnefTe of the lawe of God ? Finally , that Ihc
can bring forth nothing but matter of death ? Nowe , graunt that in
the nature of man is nothing but flefh, and gather any good out of it
if thou canfl. But (they fay) the name of flefh belongeth onely to the
fenfuall , and not the hier parte of the foule . But that is fuflficiently
confuted by the wordes of Chri{l,3nd of the Apoftle.Ttis the Lordes
argument, that manmufl be borne againc, bycaufe he is flefh. He
^ ^^' commaundeth not to be borne againe according to the body . But
in minde he is not borne againe, if a parte of it be arocnded,but when
it is all renewed. And that doth the comparifon , fet in both places,
confirme. For the fpirite is fo compared againft the flefh , that there
is left no meane thing betwcne them . Therefore whatfbeucr is not
fpirituall in man , is after the fame reafon called flcftily . But we hauc
nothing of the Spirite but by regeneration. It is therefore flefti what-
foeuer we haue of nature. But of that matter , if otherwife we coulde
Ephc.4. ^^"^ ^"y doubte , that is taken away from vs by Paulc ,'whcrc after
J. he had defcribed the olde man , whome he had faide to be corrupt
withconcupifcencesoferrour, he biddeth vs tobc renewed in the
fpirite of our minde : you fee he doth not place vnlawefuU and euill
luftcs onely in the fenfitiue part,but alfo in the very minde,and there-
fore requireth a renuing of it. And truely a httle before he had pain-
ted out fuch an image of mans nature , as did fliewe that there was no
parte wherein we were not corrupted and pcruerted : for whereas he
writeth that all nations do walke in the vanitie of their minde, are
darkened in vnderftandmg, eftranged from the life of God, by reafon
Ephc 4 of tbe ignoraunce that is in them, and the blindcneffe of their hcarte:
17, it is no doubte that this is fpoken of all them whome the Lorde hath
not reformed to the vprightneffe both of his wifcdome and mftice:
which
GodtheRedemer. Lib. 2. 107
which is alfo made more plaineby the companfon byandby adioy-
ncd , where he putteth the faithfull in minde , that they haue not Co
learned Chrift.For of thefc wordes we gather,that the grace of Chnft
is the onely remedie whereby we be dehuered from that bhndeneflc,
and the cuils that enfue thereof. For fo had Efaie alfo prqphecied of Efa. 6i
the kingdome of Chrift, when he promifedjthat the Lorde Ihould be 2.
an euerlafting light to his Church , when yet darkencffe couered the
earth, and a mift the peoples. Whereas he tefiifieth , that the light of
Ood (hall arife onely in the Church , trucly without the Church he
leaueth nothing but darkeneflc and blindeneffe.I will not reherfe pet-
ticularly fuch thinges as are written euery where,fpecially in the Ffal-
mes and in the Prophetes againft the vanity of man. It is a great thing
that Dauid writeth, if he be weyed with vanitie, that he fliall be vay- pfai.^
ner than vanitie it felfe . His wit is wounded with a greuous weapon, 10.
when all the thoughtes that come out of it, are fcorned asfoolifh,
trifeling»madde and peruerfe.
z No eafier is the condemnation of the hearte , when it is called
gailefull arid peruerfe aboue all thing:but bycaufe I ftudie to be fliorr,
I will be contente with one place alone , but fuch a one as (hall be like
a moft bright loTcing glafTe, wherin we may beholde the whole image
of our nature . For the Apoftle , when he goerh about to throwe ^
downe the arrogance of mankinde, doth it by thefe teftimonics,That ^^^^
there is not one righteous manne , There is not one manne that vn-
dei^ft'andeth or that feekeih God , Ail are gone out of the way , they pfai.i
are made vnprofitable together , there is none that doth good , no 5 j.
not one : their throte is an open fepulcher , with their tongues they ^^u :
worke dcceitfully,thc poifon of Serpentes is vnder their lippes,whofe 7*
mouth is full of curfing and bitternefle : whofe fcetc are fwifte to
fhedde bloude , in whofe wayes is forrovve and vnhappinciTe , which
haue not thefeare of God before their eyes: With thefc thunder-
boltes he inueyeth,not againft certaine menne,but againft the whole
nation of thefonnesof Adam. Neither declineth he agaitift the cor-
rupt manners ot one or two ages , but accufeth the continuall cor-
ruption of nature. For his purpofe is in that place,not (imply to chide
men , to make them amende , but to teach rather that all menne arc
opprclTed with calamitic , impoflible to be ouercome, from which
they can not get vp againe , vnlefTe they be plucked out by the mercie
of God . And bycaufe , that coulde not be proued vnlefle it had bin
by the ouerthrowe and deftru<Sion of nature , he brought forth thefc
teftimonies whereby is proued that our nature is more than de-
ftroyed. Let this therefore remaine agreed j that menne are fuch as
O iij.
Cap.j. , . .. Of the knowledge of
the; be here defcribcd , not onely by faulte of euiU cuftome , but al(b
by corrupcncfTe of nature. For othcrwifc the Apoftles argument can
not ftande , that there is no faluation for manne but by the mercie o£
God , bycaufe he is in him felfc vtterly loftc and paft hope. I will not
here bu(ie my felfe in prouing the applying of thefe teftimonJes that
no man fliouldc thinke them vnfitly vfed.l will fo take them as if they
had bin iirft fpoken by Paule , and not taken out of xhc Propbetes.
Fitft he taketh awaic from floanne righteoufeneffe , that is intcgritic
and purencfTe , and thcn^vndcrftandmg. The wante of vnderftan-
dino, he proueth by Apoftafie or departing from God ,whomc to
feeke is the fi: ft degree of wjfedome. But that wante muft nedcs hap- •
pen to them that arc fallen awaie from God. He faycth further, that
0(11 are gone out of the waie and become as it were rotten , that there
i^ none that doeth good,and then he adioyncth the haynous faultcs,
wherewith they defile their members that are ones let lofe intowic-
kednefTe. Laflof iUhe tcftifieth that they are voide of the feare of
God, after whofc rule bur fteppes (lioulde haue bin dirc«5ied. If thefe
be the inheritable gittes of mankind,^t is in vaine to fekefor any good
thing in our nature. In dzedc I graunt that not- all thefe faultcs do ap-
pearc in euery manns : yet can not be denied that tius Hydra luiketh
in the heartts oFall menne. For as the bodie while it already foftreih
cn-:loftd within ir, the caufc and matter 9fdifeafe,al though the painc
be not yet vehement , cannot be called h.alchy : no more can the
foule be reckened Tounde , while it fwarmeth full of fuch difeafe* of
vices, albeit the ijmihcudc doth not agree inall pointcs. For in the
body bi* it n*uer fo muchc difeafed , there remayneth a cjuickcneflc
of life: bat the foule beyng drowned in this gulfe of deftrudion,
is not onely troubled with vices , but alfo altogether voide of all
goodn^flfe.
5 The fame queftion in a manner which hath^ bin before aflby-
ko, now rifeth vp againe of ncwe.For in all ages there haue bin fome,
v/hich by guiding of nature haue bin bente to vertue in all their life.
And I regarde it not , though many flippinges may be noted in their
manners -.yet by the very ftudic of honeftie they haue .{hewed a profc,
that there was fome pureneffe in their nature . What rewarde fuch
vertues haue before Qod , although we will more fully declare when
we fhall fpeake of the mcrites of workes , yet we muft fpmewhat
fpeake in this place t fo farre as is neceflarie for making plaine of this
prcfent argument . Thefe examples therefore feeme to put v$ in
minde , that we ftiouldc not thinke mans nature all together corrupt,
for that by her indru(aion lome men haue not onely excelled in fome
noble
God the Redemer. Lib.2. io8
noble aftes , but alfo in the whole courfe of their life haue behaued
themfelues moft honcftly. But here we ir.uil ihinke , how in this cor-
ruption of nature there is fome place for the grace of God , not to
clcanfe it, but inwardely to reftiaine it . For if the Lord woulde fufter
the mindes of all men as it were with lofe rcines to runnc wildly into
all fortes of lu(lcs> without doubte there woulde be no man , but he
would in plaine experience make vs bcleue>thac all thofe euds where-
with Paule condemneth all nature, arc moft trucly faide of him . For Row. |i
what ? Canft thou exempt thy felfe out of the number of thcm,whofe * '^'
fectc are fwift to Hied bloude,their handes defiled with robberies and
manflaughters , their throtes hke vntoopen Sepulchres, their ton-
gues deceitfuU, their hppesvenymous, their workcs vnprofitabie,
wicked,rotten,deadly,whore minde is without God, whofc inwardcs
are peruerfenell'e , whofc eyes are bent to cntrappinges, their hcartes
lift vp difpitcouily to triumph ouer other, and all the partes of them
applied to infinite mifcheues. If cueryfoule be fubied to all fuch
inonfte.rs, as the Apoftle boldly pronounceih , truelywe fee what
woulde come to pafle,if the Lorde woulde fuftlr the luft of manne to
wander after his owne inclination. There is no madde beatt that is fo
hedlong caried awaye , there is no ftreame be it neuer fo fwifre and
ftrong, whereof the ouerflowing is fo violent. The Lorde healeth
thefe difcafes in his elede by this meane that we will byandby fette
forth. In (bmc he only rcftraineth them with putting a bridle in their
mouth, onely that they breake not out, fo farrc as he forefeeth to be
Expedient for prcferuing of the vniuerfitie of thinges . Hereby fome
are holden in by {hame , fome by fenre of lawes , that they bu:ft not
forth into many fortes of filthinelfejhowebcit they do for a grca: parf
not hide their vncleannefTe. Some bycaufe they thinke that an hpneft
trade of life is good, do after a certaine forte afpirc towarde it. Some
rife vpabouc the common forte, that by their maieftie they may
kepe other in their duetic . So God by his prouidence bridleth the
peruerfenefTe of nature, that it breake not forth into doyng : but he
cleanfeth it not within.
4 Put yet the doubte is not diflblued. For either we muft make
Camillus like vnto Catiline , or els in Camillus wc {hall haue an ex-
ample that nature t if it be framed by diligence, is not altogether
without goodncfle . I graunte in dticdc that thofe goodly giftes
whiche were in Camillus bothe were the giftes of God and fceme
worthy to be commended , if they be weyed by themfelues, but how
(hall they be proues of naturall goodneffc in him? muftewe not
ffcturne to the minde » and frame our argumente in this forte ? If a
O iiij.
Cap. 3. Ut the knowledge or
Au?. li. nacuf all mannc excelled in fuch vpnghtncffe of manners, then na-
4.cotra ^j-g jg vndoubtedly not without power towarde the ftudie of vertuc.
Buni' ^"^ ^^^^ ^^'^^ minde were peruerfe and crooked,and folowing any
thing rather than vpright ftraightiiefTe ? And that it was fuch, there
is no doubte, if you graunt that he was a nacuratl manne. Nowe what
power of mans nature to goodnefTe will you rehcrfe vnto me in this
behalfe , if in the greaceft fhewe of purencfle it be founde that he is
alway carried to corruption : Therefore , Icaft ye commende a man
for vertue , whofe vices deceyue you vnder vertues Image , do not Co
geue vnto the will of manne power to defire goodnefTe , To long as ic
remayneth faft in her owne perucrfenelfe . Albeit this is a moft fure ^
and eafy folution of this queftion , that thcfe are not common giftes
of nature, but fpeciall graces of God,which he diuerfely and lo a cer-
taine mcafure dealeth among men that arc otherwife vngodly. For
v/hich reafon we fearc not in common fpcachc to call one man well
natured, and an other of cuill nature , and yet we ceafc not to include
them bothe vnder the vniuerfall ftate of mans corruption , but we
(hewe what fpeciall grace God hath beftowed vpon the one , which
he hath not vouchefaued to geue to the other , when his pleafure was
to make Saule king, he formed him as a new man: and that is the
reafon why Plato alluding to the fable of Homere,fayeth that Kinges
formes are created notable by fome fingular marke,bycaufe God pio-
' Hiding for mankindc , furnirficth thefe with a princely nature whomc
he appointeth to bearc gouerneniet: and out of this ftpre houfe came
all the great Capitaines that are renomed in hiftories.The fame is aifo
to be thought of priuate men . Buti>ycaufe as euery man hath moll
cxcelled/o his ambition hath moft moucdhimforwarde(with which
fpotte all vertues are defiled,fo that they lofe all fauour before God,)
it is to be accompted nothingworth , what foeuer femeth praifewor-
thy in vngodly men,befide that the chcfe parte of vprightnefle faileth,
where there is no ftudy to aduaunce the glory of God, which all they
w ante whome he hath not regenerate with his fpirite. Neither is it
Efa. II. vainely fpoken in Efaie , that vpon Chrift reftcth the fpirite of the
^* feare of God,wherby we arc taught, that fo many as are ftrange from
Chrift, are without the feare of God, which is the beginning of wife-
dome. As for the vertues that deceiue v$ with vaine (hewe , I graunt
they (hall haue praile in the court of policie, and in the commo fame
of men, but before the heauenly iudgemcnt feate , they fhall be of no
valewe to deferue righteoufneffe.
f With fuch bondage of finne therforc as Will is deteyned, it cstn
not ones moue ic felfe to goodneife, much IcfTe apply ic felfc.For fuch
mouing
GodtheKedemer. Lib.2. 109
mouingc is the beginningc of turning to God, which in Scriptures is
wholly imputed to the grace of God. As lercmy praieth to the Lord icr. ji.
to turne him,ifhc will haue himc turned. Whereupon the Prophet li,
in the Tame chaptcrjdefcribing the fpiritual redemption of the faith-
ful peoplcjlayth that they were redeemed out of the hand of a ftogcr,
meaning with how ftraight fetters a (inner is bound Co long as being
f orfaken of the Lord,he liueth vnder the yoke of the Deuill.Yct Will
ftil remaynethjwhich with moft bent affedion is both enclined & ha- "^
fteth to finne . For man was not depriued of Will when he did caft
himfclfe into this neceflity,but of the foundeneffe of Will And Bcr-
narde fayth not vnaptly , which teacheth that to Will is in vs all : but
to Will good is a profiting, to will ill is a defautrand therefore fimply
to willjis the worke of manao will euill,of corrupte naturerto wil wcl,
ofgrace.Now whereas 1 fay,that will put from hberty is by neceflity
drawe or led into euill,if is maruell if tnat Ihould feeme a hard fpcsch
vnto any man,wliich neither hath any abfurdity m it, nor vaiieth fro
the vfe of holy men : But it offendeth them that can make no diffe-
rence betwene neccllicy and compulfion . But if a man aske them , is
not God of neceflity good ? is not the deuill of neceflity cuill ? what
can they aurifwere ? For fo is goodnefle knit with Gods djuinity,that
it is no more neceflary that he be Godthenthat he bcgood. And
the deuill is by his fall fo eftranged from partaking of goodnefle,that
he can do nothing but cuill. But now if any robber of God do barkc
againft this and fayjthat God deferueth fmale praifc for his goodncs,
which he is compelled to keepe:fhall not this be a ready aunfwcrc to
him, that it commcth to pafle by his infinite goodnefle and not by
violent impulfionjthat he can not do euell.Therefore if this,that it is
of neceflfitie that God doe well, do not hinder the free will of God in
doing weljif the deuil which cartmot do but euil yet willingly (inneth
who fliall then fay that a man doothe therefore lefle willingly finnc
for this that he is fubied to neceflity of finning.This neceflity ,wher-
asAuguftine cch where fpeakethofit, euendien alio when he was ^J^^^|^
enuioufly prelTed with the cauillarion of Ccleftius , he flicked not to fnftit.
aflirme in theic wordes,by liberty it came to pafle that man was with
(innCjbut now the corruption which flowed for puniflimcnt, hath of
liberty made neceflity. And Co oft as he fallcth into mention thereof,
he douteth not to fpeake in this manner of the neceflary bondage
offinnc. Therefore let this fummc of that diftindion be kept, thatoenat.
man fins he is corrupted , finneth in deede willingly and not againft & grac*.
his will nor compelled , by a moft bent afledion of minde , and not & alibi.
by violent compulfion , by motion of hii ownc luft,and not by for-
v^ap. 3, Kji Liic Kiiuwicugc 01
rcn conlhaynt : but yet of fuch peruerfenefle ot nature as he is > he
can nor but be moued and driuen to euil. If this be true,then furcly ie
Ser.fu. is playnely exprefled that he is fubied to neccflicy of (inning.Bcrnard
per Ci agreeing to Auguftine wryteth thus, only man among all liuing crea*
ticSi. ^yj.g5 j5 free:and yet by meane of finne , he alfo futfercih a certaync
vioknce,but of wil and not of n3ture,that eucn thcrby alfo he Hiould
not be depriucd offreedome, for that which is willing is free. And a
litle afcer,wil being chaunged in it felfe into worfe,by I wot not what
corrupt and maruelous manner, fo makcth neceffityjthat very ncccP-
fity for as much as it is wiUing,can not cxcufe wiU,and will forafmuch
as it is drawen by allurement , can not exclude neceffity , for this ne- ^
ceffity is after a certaine manner willing. Afterward he rayih,y we arc
prefled downe with a yoke, but yet none other but of a certaine wil-
ling bondage , therefore by reafon cf our bondage wc are miferable,
by reafon of our will we are inexcufablcjbecaufe will when it was fre,
made it felfe the bondferuaunt of finne. At length he concludethithat
thefoule isfo after a certaine maruelous and euill manner holdea
both a bonde fcruaunt and free , vnder this certaine willingc and ill
free neceffity : a bondferuaunt by reafon of neceffity , free by reafon
of wil,and that which is more maruelous and more miferable, therein
gilty wherein ir isfree,thcrein bond wherein it is gilty,and fo therein
bond wherein it is free . Hereby truely the readers do pcrceiue tha«
I bringe no newe thinge,which longe ago Auguftine brought foorth
out of the confcnt of all godly men,and almoft athoufand yeares af-
ter was kept ftiU in monkes Cloyfters. But Lombarde when he could
nor diftinguiih neceffity fro compul(ion,gauc matter to a pcrnitious
crrour.
6 On the otherfide it is good to confider what manner remedy is
that of the grace of Godjwhcreby the corruption of nature is amen-
ded and healed . For whereas the Lord in helping vs , giueth vs that
which we want, when wc fliall knowc what his worke is in vs, it will
ftreigh:way appcare on the other fide what is our needincfle. When
Phi. 1,6 the Apoftle fayeth to the PhiUppians, that he crufteth that he which
beganne a good worke in them , will performc it ynio the day of Ic-
fus Chrift • it is no dou: , that by the beginninge of a good worke,
he meaneth the very beginninge of coimtrfion, which is in will.
Therefore God beginneth a good worke in vs by ftirring vp in our
heartes theloue,defire and endeuour of rightcoufnefle , or (to fpeakc
more properly)in bowing,framing and direding our heartes to righ-
tcoufnefle : he endeth it in confirminge vs to perfeuerance . And that
no man ihould cauill that good is begonne by the Lord, when will
being
God the Redemcr. Lib,2. no
being of it felfc weakc is holpen : the holy Ghoft in an other place
declareth what will is able to do beingc lett vnto it felfe . I will giuc
you (Tayth he) a ncwe heart . I will put a newe fpirite in the nniddes Exe.ji;,
of you . And I will take away the ftony heart from your flefli , and I la.
will giue you a heartorflefh. And I will put my fpirite in the middes
of you, and I will make you to walke in my commaundementes.
Who {hall lay that the weakeneffe of mans will is ftrengthened with
heipc , whereby it may effedually afpire to the choife of that that is
good 3 when it muft be whole transformed and renewed ? If there be
any fbtteneflc in a ftone , which by fome hejpe being made tenderer
will abide to be bowed euery wayjthcn will I graunt that the heart of
man is pliable to obey that which is right , fo that that which in it is
perfed, be fupphed by the grace of God . But if he meant to Hiewc
by this limilitude , that no goodnclfe could euer be wrong out of our
heart vnleiTe it be made throughly newe : lerte vs not parte betwcnc
him and vs, that which he chalengeth to himfelfe alone . If there-
fore a ftone be transformed into fiefhc , when God turncth vs to the
defire o^ that which is right : then is all that which was of our ovvnc
will takjn away , and that which commeth tn place thereof is all of
G.>d. i fay chat will is taken away, not m that it is will, becaufe in the
conuerlion of rhan , that which was oi the firft nature abideth whole:
alfo I fay that it is created newe , not that will then beginneth to be,
but that it be turned from an euill willinto a good. And this I affirme
to be wholly done by God , becaufe we are not able fo much as to
thinke , as the fame Apoftlc witnefl'eth : therefore in an other place
he fayth , that God doth not onely helpe our weake will , or amende ^
our perutrfe will , but that he worketh in vs to will . Whereupon is Ptiili. «,
caiily gathered, that which I fayd before, that whatfoeuer good is in ij.
will, it is tlvc worke of onely grace. In which fenfc in an other place
hefayeth, that it is God that worketh all in all. Neither doth he t.Cor.
there intreate of the vniuerfall gouernement , but giucth vnto God ^^'^'
alone the praife of all good things that the faithful! haue. And m fay-
ing,all,truely he maketh God the author offpirituall life, cucn from
the beginning to the ende. Which felfe fame thing he had taught be-
fore in other wordcs , fayingc that the faythfull arc of God in Chnft. ,,cor.
where he plainely maketh mention of the new creation, wherein that jj.g,
which was of common nature berore,is deftroycd. For there is to be
vnderftandcd a comparifon betwenc Adam and Chrifl: , which in an
Other place he more playnly cxprefTeth , where he teacheth that wc
arc the worke of God created in Chrift to good workes , which he
hath prepared that we ihosldc walke in chem. For he gocth about
Cap. 3. Of the knowledge of
by chis reafbn to proue, that our faluation is of free gift, becaufe the
beginning ofall goodnefTejis at the feconde creation, which we ob-
cayne in Chrift . Butifthere were any power of our felues, wercic
ncuer fo fmale, we (liould hauealfo fome portion of merite . But he
to proue vs altogether nothing worth,reafoneth that we haue defer-
ucd nothing, becaufe we are create in Chriit to good workcs, which
God hath prepared . In which wordcs he fignifieth againe , that all
partes of good workes,cucn from the firft motio,are propre to Goi
onely. For this reafon,the Prophete after he had fayd in the Pfalmc
that we arc the workemanfliip of God, that there fhould be no parti-
tion , addeth byandby , We made not our felues . That he fpcaketh
there of regeneration,which is the beginning of fpirituall life,appea-
rcth by the tenor of the text , where it byandby after followeth , that
wearchis people & the flocke of his paftures.Wefee now,how he not
contented limply to haue giuen to God the praife of our faluation,
doth exprefly exclude vs from allfellowHiip with him,as if he would
fay, that there refteth no pecce,be it neuer fo litle,for man to glory in,
becaufe it is all of God.
7 But there will be fome peraduenture that will graunt , that Will
being of her owne nature , turned away from good > is conucrted by
the only power of theLord:bui fo that being prepared before,it hath
Ad Bo- alfo her owne parte in doing, as Auguftine teacheth,that grace goeth
nif.Epi. bj.fore euery good workcbut fo,that will doth accompany it and not
*■* leade it, as a waytingmaide after it, and not a foregocr. Which thing
being not euill fpoken by the holy manjPeter Lombarde doth difor-
dcrly wryth to this purpofe. But I affirme, that as well in the wordes
of the Prophet which I haue alleaged,asin the other places,thefe two
ihinges be playnely fignificd , that the Lord doth both corr^ our
corrupted will or rather deftroy it,& alfo of himfelfe putteth in place
' therof a good will. In as much as it is preuented by grace, in that rc-
fpcd I giue you leaue to call it a wayting maide : but for that beinge
reformedjit is the workc of the Lord,this is wrongfully giuen to man
that he doth with will c5ming after, obey grace going before. Ther-
Ser. de fpre it is not wel wrytten of Chryfoftome,that neither grace without
inuent, wili.nor will without grace can worke any thing : as if grace did not
^ '^^* worke very well it felfe,as euen now we haue feene by Paule. Neither
was it Auguftines purpofe , when he called mannes will the waytingc
maide of grace,to alligne vnto her a certaine fecond office in doing a
good workc, but becaufe this only was his intent, to confute the wic-
ked dodrinc of Pelagius,which did fet the principal! caufe of falua-
tion in mans deferuing : therefore he (lode only vpon this point,that
grace
GodthcRedemer. Lib.2. iii.
grace was before all dcfcruingiwhich was fufficiec for the matter that
he then had in handc , not mcdling in the meane time with the other
quedion , concerning the perpetuall effed of grace } which yet in an
other place he excellently well handlcth . For fomecimes when he
laith,y the lord doth preuent the vnwilling that he may wil,& follo-
weth the willing that he wil not in vayne, he maketh him altogether
the whole author of the good worke. Albeit his fentences touching
this mattcr,are to plaine to neede any long argumg vpon them.Men Ao.li.a,
(fayth he) do labour to finde in our will fomething that is our ownc *^^.J1*'
and not of God,but how it may be found I know not.And in his firft ^j^. *
bookc againft Pelagius and Celeftius , where he doth expounde that cap. i &.
faying of Chrift, Euery one that hath heard of my father comcth to loh.6,
me,he fayth : Freewill is Co holpen not only that it may know what is 4J»
to be done, but alfo may do it when it hath knowen it. And fo when
God teacheth , not by the letter of the law , but by the grace of the
rpirite>he fo teacheth,that he that hath leamed,doth not only fee it in
knowing,but alfo defire it in willing,and performe it in doing.
8 And*bccaufe wc are now in hand with the chiefe point wherupo
the matter hangeth , let vs go forward and proue the fumme thereof
lo she readers , onely with a fewe & y moft plaine tcftimonies of the
Scripture. And then,leaft any man fhould accufe vs of wrongful wrc-
ftmg the Scripture , let vs {hew that the trueth which we amrme be-
ing taken out of the Scripture,wanteth not the teftimony of this ho-
ly man,I meane Auguftinc. For I thinke it not expedient, that all the
thingcs be rchearfcd that may be brought out of the Scriptures , for
confirmation of our meaning/© that by die moft chofen that dial be
brought forth.y way may be prepared to vnderftand all the reft that
are here and there commonly red. And againe,! thmkc it Ihall not be
vnfitly done , if I openly fliew that I agree well with that man whom
worthily the confent of godly men doth much cfteeme. Surely it is e-
uident by plaine and certaine proufc,that the beginning of goodneflc
is from no where elfe but only from God.for there can not be found
a will bent to good, but m the eied. But the caufe of eledion is to be
fought out of man . Whereupon folio weth, that man hath not right
Wil of himfelfe,but it proceedeth fro the fame good plcafure,wher-
by we are eled before the creatio of the world.there is alfo an other
reafon not vnhke vnto that.For whereas the beginning of wilhng and
doing well is of faith,it is to be fceiie whenfe faith it fclfe comcth. For
afmuch as the whole Scripture crieth our that itis a free pft of God,
it followeth,y it is of the mere grace of God, wf^ we,which are with
all our mindc naturally bent to cutll,begm to will that which is good.
Cap.3» Of the knowledge of
Thertbre thelord> whe he nameth rhcfe two things in the conucr(Io
of his people,to take away from them a ftony hearr,and to giuc ihem
a heart of flefh, plainly tertifieth that that which is of our fellies muft
be done away , that wc may be conucrted to nghteoufneffe : and that
whatfoeucf commeth in place therof, is from himfelfe. And he vttc-
ler. 3». reth not this in one place only. For he layihinleremy:! wilgiuethem
3^' one heart and one way, that they may feare me all their day es. And a
htle after. I will giue the feare of my name into their heart,that ihey
Exe.iz. departe not from me.Againein Ezcchiel;! wiltgiue them one heart,
'y- and I will^iue a new fpirite in their bowels. 1 will take away the rtony
heart out of their ficfli, and 1 v/iU eiue them a heart of Hclh. He could
not more euidently claime to himfelfe,& take from vs whatfoeucr is
good and nghr in our will , than when he decbreth that our conuer-
fionisa creation of a new fpirite,andofanewhcart.For it followeth
alway , that both out of our will proceedeth no &,oodr.cfie till it be
reformed:and that after reformation, fo much as u is good, is of God
and not of vs.
9 And (o readc we the prayers of holy men made to that efFe<ft,
i.Reg.S aSjThc Lord encline our heart to him (faych Salomon)that we may
5'» kcpehis commaundementes. HelTieweth the frowardnefl'e of our
heart which naturally reioyfeth to rebeil agaynft the lawe of God if it
PCi 10. ^^' ^^'^ bowed . And the fame thinge is in the Pfalme : Lord incline
36, my heart to thy tettimonies. For the comparifon of contrariety is al-
way to be noted , which is betwenc the peruerfe motion of the heart
v/hereby it is caned to obftinacyjand this coiTcdion whereby it is led
Pfa, ?i to obedience. When Dauid feeling himfclfe for a time without the
12. * directing grace,prayeth God to create a new heart within him, to rc-
nue a right fpirite within his bowellcs:doth he not acknowledge that
all the partes of his heart are full of vncleiMiefle , and his fpirite wry-
chen with crooked pcruerfeneilt ? and i^ calling the cleannefle which
he prayethfor , the creature of God, doth he not attribute it whol-
ly to God ? Bur if any inanne take exception and fay , that the very
prayer is a token of a godly and holy affedioniour aunfwere is ready,
that though Dauid were by that time fomewhatcome toamcnde-
ment, yet doth he ftiU compare his Hrft ftate with that forowfuU fall
that he had felt . Therefore taking vpon him the perfon of a man c-
flraunjcd from God , he for good caufe prayeth to hauc giuen him
all thefe thinges thar God giuerh to his cled in regeneration , And
To bein^e like a deade man,he wifneth himfelfc to be created of new,
that of the bondflaue of Satan,he may be made the inllrument of the
holy Ghoft. Maruclous & monftruous furely is the luft of our pride.
God
GodtheRedemcn Lib.2. in
Goclrcquircth nothing inoreearncftIy,tbanywcrtiouldmoftreligi-
oufly keepe his Sabbat, that is in reftmg from our owne workes , but
of vs nothing is more hardly obcained,than bidding ourownc works
farewell j to giue due place to the workes of God. If fluggifhncflc
hindered not, Chrift hath giuen teftimony euident enough of his
graces to make them not to be enuioutly fupprcfled. I am (fayth he) j .
the Vine , you be the branches : My Father is a husbandman. As the ,^
branche can not bcare fruite of it felfc,vnlefle it abide in the Vine,no
more can you, vnlcflcyouabideinme. For without me you can do
nothing. If we beare fruite none otherwife than a braunche buddcih
being plucked out of the ground and without moyfturcrwc neede no
more to feeke what is the aptnefl'e of our nature to goodmffe. And
this is a pbync conclufion : Without me yc can do nothing.He doth
not fay that we arc to wcaketobe fufficientfor ourfelues : but in
bringing vs to nothing,he cxcludcth all opinion of power be it neucr
Co lule. If we being giaffed in Chrift , beare fruite like a Vine>which
taketh her efficacy of liuclincfTe both from the moifture of the earth,
and from the deaw of hcauen, and from the chcrifhing of the funne:
1 fee nothingc remaync for vs in doingc a good workc , if we keepe
whole for God that which is his . That fondc futtle deuife is ajlear
ged in vaine,that there is a iuyce already enclofed within the branch,
and a certayne power to bringc foorth frute,and that therefore it ta- Mac.i$
keth not all from the earth or from the firft rootc,bccaufe it bringeth i j.
fomewhatof hcrowne. For Chrift doth meane nothingc elfc, but
that we arc a dric fticke and nothing worth,whcn wc be feucred from
him , bceaufe by our fdues bcingc feparate , wc haue no pov/er to do
wellras alfo in an other place he faytn.Eucry tree that my father hath
not planted , fhall be rooted vp. Wherefore the Apoftlc afcribeth all PHili.J.
the whole vnio him in the place already allcagcd.lt is Godf faith he) M*
that worketh in vs both to will and to pcrforme . The firft parte of a
good worke is wilhthe fccond is a ftrong endeuour in doing it? y au-
thor of both is GodTherforc we ftcalc it from God,ifwe take to our
felues any thing, either in will or in eflcduall working. If it were fayd
that God doth hclpe our weakc will, then fomewhat were left for vs.
But when it is fayd that he maketh wiilj now all the ecod thst is in it,
is fet out of vs . And becaufe the good will is yet ftill opprciTed with
weight of our flefhy it ca not rife vp.Hc faidfuriher,thac to oucrcom
the hardnefTe of that batfcli,there is miniftred vnto vs ftcdf::ftnc0e of
endeuour, euen to the cffctl . For otherwife it could not ftand toge-
ther which he tcachethin an orher place , that it is God alcne that ,.Coa.
bnngeth to cfFcd all thinges in all , wherein wc haue before taught i ».^
Cap. 3 . Of the knowledge of
that the whole courfe of fpiritualllife k comprehended . For which
Pfa. 85. re3ron,Dauid, after heJiad prayed to hauc the wayes of the Lord o-
»»• pened vnto him , that he might walke in his trueth , byandby addeth:
Vnite thou my heart to fpare thy name . In which wordes he fignifi-
cth,that eucn they that are well minded,are fubied to fo many with-
drawing^. of minde,that they eafily vanifh or fal away if they be not
ftabhlhtd to conftancy. For which reafon in an other place,after he
had prayed to haue hisfteppes direded to kepe the word of God he
K I oo, rcquirct h alfo to haue ftrengrh giuen him to fight,Lctte not any ini-
t9.ioo. quity (fayth he ) beare rule ouer me. After this forte therefore doth
ih the Lord both beginneandende goodworkein vs.* that it may all bfr
his worke, that will conceiueth a loue of that which is right, that it is
cnclined to the defire thereof, that it is ftirred vp and moued to en-
deuour of following it. And then that our choife,de()re,and endeuour
faint not,but do procecde euen to the eflfeut:laft of all,that man goclSi
forward conftantly in them,and continueth to the end.
10 And he moueth the will,not in fuch forte as hath in many ages
bin taught and beleued : that it is afterward in our choife,either to o-
bey or withftand the motio,but with mightily ftrengthning it. Thcr-
fore that muft be reieded wHich Chryfortome fo oft repetethrwhom
he draweth,hc dra'weth being willing. Whereby he fecrctly tcacheth
that God doth oncly reach out his hand , to fee if we will he holpen
by his aide . We graunt that fuch was the ftate of man while he yet
ftoode , that he might bow to either parte.But fiih he hath taught by
bis example how miferable is freewill , vnleffe God both will and can
in vs: what {hall become of vs,if he giue vs his grace according to that
fmale proportion ? But rather we do obfcure and extenuate it with
our vnthankefullnes. For the Apoftle doth not teach , that the grace
of a good wil is offred vs if we do accept it, but that he wil pcrforme
it in vs:which is nothing elfe,but that the Lord by his fpirite doth di-
rcft , bowe and gouerne our heart , and rcignetii in it as in his owne
F.re.i I. pofltflion . Neither doth he promife by Ezechiel.that he will giue to
?? 27 ^^^ ^^^^ ^ "^^ fpirite onely for this ende , that they may be able to
luh .9! walke in his commaundcmentcs , but to make them walke in detdc,
45. Neither can Chtifts faying, (cuery one that hath heard of my Father
commeth to me)be otherwiic taken , than to teach that the grace of
J ib.de God is effeduall of it felferas Aiiguftine alfo affirmeth Which grace,
f'^1^ God vouchefaueth not to giue to all men generally without rcgarde,
as that faying ( as I thinke ) ofOccsm , is commonly fpoken among
the peopicjthat it denicth nothing to him that doth what lieth in him.
Men are in dcede to be cjiught that Gods goodncife is layd open for
all
GodthcRedemcr. Lib.2, 113
all men , without exception that feekc for it . But forafmuch as they
onely beginnc to feeke for it , whom the heauenly grace hath brea-
thed vpon , not (6 much as this hcle pecce ought to be plucked away
from his praife.Truely this is the prerogatiuc of the elcft,that being
icgcnerats by the fpin te of God , they are moued and goucrned by
his guiding. Therfore Auguftine doth worthily as well mockc them,
thatclaimeany parte of Willing them tothemfelucs , as he doth re-
prehend other which thinke that , that is generally giucn to all men,
which is the fpeciall teftimony of free eledion.Nature,(rayth he)but
not grace, is common to all men. Calling it a brickie futtelty of wittc ^,^^^ *
like gldlfe , that ghftercth with mere vanity i where it is generally ex- Apoft.
tended to all which God giucth onely to whom it pleafeth him. And feuiu
in an other place. How cameft thou ? by beleuing . Fcare thou, Jeaft
while thou takeft vpon thee that thou haft founde the iuft way>ihou
pcrifli out of the iuft way . I came (fay eft thou) by Free will, I came
by mine owne will, why fwclltft thou ? wilt thou heare that this alfo
is giuen thee ? Heare euen him that caUeth:No man commcth to me , , .
vnlefTe my Father draw him. And it is without controuerfic gathered ^^ *
out of lohns wordes , that the hcartes of the godly arc fo cfFedually i.loh.j.
goucrned by Gods working , that they follow with an vnchangeable 9*
afTedion.He that is begotten of God(rayth he) can not/inne,becaufc
thefeedeofGodabideth inhim. For we fee that the meane motion
which the Sophifters imagine, which we at our liberty may cither o-
bey or rcfufcjis opMily cxcluded,whcre an efFeduall conftancy to co-
tinue IS affirmed.
1 1 Of continuauncc there ftiouldc no more dour haue bin made,
but that it ftiould haue bin taken for the free gift of God vnlefle the
moft wicked errour had growen in force , that it is diftributed accor-
ding to the defert of men,as euery man hath fhewed himfelfe not vn-
thankefull to the firft grace . But forafmuch as this errour hath gro~
wen vpon that point , that they thought it to be in our hand to re-
fuse or receiue the gtace of God offered , that opinion being driuen
aw3y,this other doth alfo fall of it felfe. Albeit herein they crrc two
manner of wayes. For befide this that they teach that our thankefull-
nefte toward the firft grace and our lawfiill vfc thereof, are rewarded
with the later giftes : they adde alfo , that nowe grace alone doth not
workc in vs , but that it is onely a worker together with vs. Of the
firft this we ought to bcleue , that the Lord while he dayly enricheih
and heapeth his feruauntcs with newe giftes of his grace,bccaufc he
liketh and fauoureth the worke which he hath bcgonnc m them, fin-
dcth in them fomewhat whereupon to beftowe greauer graces . And
Cap.3. Of the knowledge of
hereto lei ue thofe fayinges :To him that hath,lhalbc giuen.Againe:
Mat' » 5 Oh, good fei uaum _, becaufe thou haft bin faithfull in few thirigcs, I .
wilt kc ihce ouer many .But here two things are to be taken heede of,
that neither the iawcfuU vfe of the firft grace be fayd to be rewarded
with the later graceSjnor it be Co compted a rewarding,that it cefle to
be reckened the free grace of God. I graunt tliercforc,that this blef-
iing of God is to be looked for of the faithfull , that howc much the
better they haue vfed the Hrft graces , iht y {halbe encreafed with fo
much the greater. But I fay, that this vfe alfo is of the Lord, and that
this rewarding is^ of his free goodwill. And they vfenolefl'e wrong;-
fully than vnhappily that olde deftrudion of wcrkinge and togctheiv
working grace. Auguftine vfed the fame in decde,but delaying it with
a fit deftnition,y God in together working with vs doth ende, that w
in working he beginneth,and thar it is ftill the fame grace but chaun-
geih name,according to the diuerfe manner of effed. Wherupon foU
iowethjthat he doth not parte ic betwene God and vs,as if there were
a muiuall meeting together by y motio of both,but only noteth the
mukiplicati5 of grace. To which puipofe belogeth chat which in an
other place he teachcth , that many giftes of God do go before the
good will of man,3mong the which the k\fe fame is one.Wherupon
foUowethjthat he leaueth nothing that it may claimc to it felf.Which
thing Paul alfo haih namely exprefTed ; For when he had fayd that it
is Godjwhich worketh in vs both to will and to perfomcjhe byandby
-addcth , that he doth them both of his good will declaringe by this
wordjthat it is his free goodneffe. Whereas they arc wont to fayjthac
-after we haue once glue place to the firft grace>our ownc endcuours
do now workc together with the grace that followeth. To this I aa,-
fwere : If they meane that we , after we haue bin once by the power
of the Lorde broken to the obedience of righteoufnefte , do of our
owne accorde go forward, and are inclined to follow the working of
grace, I fpeake nothinge againft it. Forit ismoft certayne, that
there is fuch a readines of obeying, where the grace of God reigneih.
But whenfe con>mcth chat , but from this , that the fpirite of God aU
way agrceingc with ic felfe , doth cheriOic and confirme to ftedfaft-
nefte of continuine^the fame aflVdion of obeying , which it felfe cn-
gendred at the beginning. But if they meane that man takcth ofhim-
ifclfe fomwbat whcrby to labour with the grace of God,they arc moft
peftilcntly deceiued.
It ■ And to rhis purpofe is that fayinge of the Apoftlc wrongfully
wrafted by ignorauncc:! haue laboured more than they alhnot Ijbut
the grace of Gpd with mc. for they take it fo : that becaufe it might
ieeme
GodtheRcdemer. Lib.2. 114
fecme fomwhat arrogantly tpoken that he preferred himfelfc before
them alljtherfore he correded it with rt fcrnng the praife to the grace
of God J but yet Tojthat he callcth himfeife a worker together with
grace. It is niaruellthatfomany which otherwife were not cuill men,
haue ftombled at this Itraw. For the Apolltle doth not wry te that the
grace of the Lord laboured with him, to the intent to make himfeife
partener of the labour , but rather by this corredion he giucth away
all y praife of the labour to grace only. It i^ not ! (fayth hc)that haue
laboured, but the grace of God that was with me. Bur the doutfulnes
of the fptach decciued them : but fpecially the ill tranflation wherein
the force of the Greke article was left out. For if it be trantlatcd word
for word,hc doth not fay,thar grace was a worker together wuh him,
but that the grace that was with him was the worker of ail. And the
fame thing doth Auguftine teachjnot darkely, though ihortly, where
he thus l'aith:The good will of man goeth btfore many gifts of God, Pfa, 5^.
but not before all . But of them which it goeth before, it felfe is one, ^ '•
then followeth his reafonrbecaufe it is wrytten : His mercy hach pre- ^^
ueted me: And his mercy fliall follow me. It preuenteth man not wil- ^^ ' ^'
linge,ro make him will:5f it followeth him willinge,that he wil not in
yaine.With whom Bernard agrceth bringing in the church fpeaking 5^^ ^ -^^
thusrDrawe me in a maner vnwillinge,tbac thou maift make me wil- Cauc.
lingrdraw me lying flouthf ull,that thou maift make mc runne.
1 3 Now let v& heare Auguftine fpeaking in his owne wordeSjleaft
the Pelagians of our age, that is to fay , the Sophifters of Sorbone,
ihouldc as they are wont, lay to our charge that all antiquiric is a-
gainil vs , wiiercin they followe their father Pelagius, by whom long
ago Auguftine was dravven foorth into the fame contention . In his
booke of Corrcption and Grace wrytten to Valentine he entreateth
largely that which I will lehearfe fhortely , but yet do it in his owne
wordes; that to Adam wasgiuen the grace of continuinge in goodif Capi.i.
he would : and to vs is giucn to will , and by will to ouercome con-
cupifccncc : that he therefore had to be able if he would , but not to
will that he might be able : to vs is giuen both to will and to be able.
That the fiift liberty was to be able not to finne , ours is much grca-
ter,not to be able to finne. And Icaft he fhoulde be thought tc fpeake
of the perfedion to come after immortality (as Lombard wrongful-
ly draweth it to that meaning)within a htle after he plucketh out this
dout . For ( fayth he ) the will of holy men is fo much kindeled by
the holy Ghoftjthat they therfore arc able , becaufe they fb wihthcy
therefore will, becaufe God worketh y they fo will. For if in fo great ^
wcakenefie, in which yet behoueththe power to be made pcricd, ,j «
P ii.
Cap.3 . Of the knowledge of
for repreiling of pride,their owne will were left vmo thcjthat by the
help of God they may if they will, and God doth not workc in them
to will ; then amonge fo many temptations will fhoulde needes fall
downe for wcakenefTejand therefore could not continue.Therforc is
fuccour giuen to the weakencfle of mans will , that it fhould be mo-
ued without fwaruing or feuering by the grace of God, and therforc
fhoulde not faint how weake fo euer it be. Then he entreateth more
' ^' largely howe our heartes do of ncceffity follow the mouing of God
that workcth aft'edio in them. And he fayth,that the Lord doth draw
men in deedc with their owne wills,but with fuch as he himfclfe hath ,
wrought. ISfowe haue we that thingc icftified by Auguftines mouth,
which we principally defire to obtaine, that grace is not only offered
by God to be recciucd or refufed at euery mans Free election, but
alfo that grace is the fame, that formeththe cledionand will in the
bearttfo that euery good wcrke that followeth after , is the frute and
effed thereof, and that it haue no other will obeying it, but the fame
which it hath made . For thefe are alfo his wordes out of an other
pjace,that nothing but grace maketh euery good worke in vs.
14 But whereas he fayth in an other place , that will is not taken
ipi.ioo away by grace, but from an cuill will turned into a good, and holpen
>• when it is good : he meaneih onely that man is not fo drawen,that
without any motion of heart he iscariedas by an outwarde impul-
fionjbut that he is inwardly fo afFeded,that from his very heart he o-
bcycth. That grace is fpecially and freely giuen to the eled,he wry-
Ipi.ioo tcth thus vnto 13oniface;We know that grace is not giuen to all men,
»• and to them to whom it is giuen,it is not giuen according to the me-
rites of workes , nor according to the merites of will,but office fa-
uour ; and to them to whom it is not giuen , we know that it is by the
iuft iudgcment of God that it is not giuen . And in the fame Epiflle
he ftrongly fightcth againft that opinion , that the grace foUowinge
is giuen to the defcruinges of men , becaufe in not refufinge the firfl
grace , they fhewed themfelues worthy . For he will haue Pelagius
graunt, that grace is necelTary to vs for euery of our doinges , and is
not giuen in recompcnfe to workes,thai it may be grace in deede.But
the matter can not be comprehended in a fhortcr fumme , than out
of the eight chapter of his booketo Valentine of Correption and
GracCjwhere firft he teacheth that mans will obtayneth not grace by
liberty,bui liberty by grace : and that by the fame grace, by affedion
ofdelite printed in him,it is framed to continuance, that it is ftreng-
thcned with inuincible force : that while grace gouerneth,it neuer faN
:pi. 46, Icth away ; when grace forfakcth, it byandby tombleth downc. That
by
GodthcRedemcr. Lib.2. 115
by the free mercy of God it both is conuertcd to good , and beingc
conucrted abidcth in it , that the diredion of mans will to good , and
ftedfaftneflc after diredion,hangeth vpon the ortely will of God, and
not vpon any metite of his owne . And fo to man is left fuch a free
wiil,if wc hft Co to call it, as he wryteth of in an other place , that can.
neither be turned to God, nor abide in God but by grace, & by grace
is aUe ail that it is able.
The jiij. Chapter.
How Gad vvorl{eth in the heart es of men,
YTis fufficiemlyproued, as Ithinke , thatmanisfbholden
captiue with the yoke of Sinne , that of his owne nature he
can neither afpire by deGre,nor trauaile by endeuour to good-
neffe , befide that , we haue rehearfed a didindton betwenc
compulfion & neceffity , whereby it might appeare , that when he
(inncth of neceffity , yet neuerthelefle he (inneth willingly . But for-
afmuch as while he is fubied in bondage to the Deuill , he fecmeth
rather to be ledde by the deuils will than his owne , it rcfteth nowe
to be declared of what forte are both kindes of workinge . And
then is this queftion to be aflbiled , whether in euill workes there
beanythinge to be attributed to God : in which the Scripture flie-
weth that there is vfed fome working of his. In one place Auguftinc
compareth mans will to a horfe , which is ready to be ruled by the
will of his rider ; and God and the Deuill he compareth to riders . If
God ( fayth he ) fit vpon it, he like a fober and cunrring rider,gouer-
ncth it temperatly , fpurreth it forward if it be to flow , plucketh it
backeif itbe toquickc, reftrayneth the wantonnefTe and wildneflc
of it , tameth the ftubbornncfle of it , and guydeth it into rhc right
way. But if the Deuill haue pofTefled it, he like a foohfti and wanton
rider , violently carieth it through places where no way is , driueth it
into ditches , rollcth it downeftcepc places , fpurreth it forward to
ftubbbornnefle & fearcenefTc : which fimilitude we will for this time
be cotented with, fith there commeth not a better in placc.Where it
is fayd that the will of a naturall man is fubied to the rule of the De-
uilljto be ftitred by himjit is not ment therby that man as it were ftri-
uing againft itj& refilling is compelled to obey, as we compell bond-
flaues againft their wihby reafon of being their lordes,to do our c6*
maundementes : but that beinge bewitched with the deceites of Sa-
tan, it of neceffity yeldeth it felfc obedient to euery leading of him.
For whom the Lord vouchefaueth not to rule with his fpirite > them
P iij.
!.2
Cap. 4. Of the knowledge of
by iul^ iudgement he fcndeth away to be moutd of Satan. Where-
2.Cor.4 fore the Apoftle fayth , that the God of this world hath blinded the
mindcs o[ the vnbclcuers ordained to deftrudiOjthatthey Hiouldnot
fee tlic light of the GofpcU And in an other place : That he worketh
in the difobedient children. The blindinge of the wicked , and all the
wicked deedes that follow therupon,are called the workes of Sathan,
of which yet the caufe is not to be fought elfewhere, than in the wUl
of man,out of which arifeth the roote of euell,wherin refteth the fun-
dation of the kingdome of Sathan, which is Sinnc.
z But farre other is the order of Gods doing in (iich thinges. And
that the fame may appeare more certainly vnto vs:let the hurt done to
the holy ma lob by the Chaldees,be an example. The Chaldees kil-
led his herdmen,and like enemies in warrc, drouc away his cattell for
booties. Now is their wicked deede pLunely fccnct and in that wOrke
Sathan is not idle , from whome the Hiftciiy fayeth , that all this did
proceedc. But lob himfelfe did acknowledge the worke of the Lordc
in itjwhom he fiyth to haue taken away from him thofe thinges,that
were taken away by the Chaldees.How can wc referre the felfe fame
worke to God,a$ author,to Sathan as author,and to manas author of
itjbur that we muft either excufe Sathan by the company of God , or
report God to be the author ofeuill? Very eafilyrif firft we looke vpo
the ende,why it was done,and then the manner how. The purpofe of
the Lord is by calamity to exercifc the pati :nce of his feruaunt: The
deuil goeth about todriuc him to dcfpeir.The Chaldees againft right
and law , feeke gayne of that which is an other mans. Such diuerfi-
ty in purpofcs j maketh great difference in the worke . And in the
manner oFdointj ihere is noltlTediuerluy.The Lord leaucth his fer-
uaunt to Sathan to be afflided:and the Chaldces,whom he did chofc
for ininirters to execute it,he did Icaue & dchuer to him to be driuen
to if.Sathan with his venemous ftings,pricked forward the mindes of
the Chaldees which orherwife were periierfe of thefelues to do that
mifchiefc : they furioufly runne to do wrong,and do binde and dehlc
al their members with wicked doing.Therfore it is properly faid,thac
Sathan doth worke in the reprobate,in whom he exercifeth his king-
dome;t!iat is to fay, the kingdome ofwickedneffe. Itisalfo fayd that
God worketh in them after his maner,becaufe Sathan himfelfe,foraf-
much as he is theinflrumentof his wrath,according to his biddinge
& commaundementjturncth himfelfe hither & thither to execute liis
iull iudgements.I fpeake not here of Gods vniuerfall mouing,wherc-
by as all creatures are fufteincd , fo from thence they take their efic-
duall power of doing any thing.I fpeake only of that (peciall doinge,
which
God the Redemer. Lib.2. ii6
which appeareth in eucry fpeciali ad. We fee therfore that it is no ab-
furdity jthatonefcireadbeafcnbed roGod, toSathm, and to m.-ju:
but the diucrfity in the end and mancr of doing , caufeth tiiat therein
appeareth the iuHicc of God to Se without faulr,and alfo the wickcd-
nes of Sathan and man,bewrayeth it felfe to their reproch.
^ The old wryters in this point airo,are fomtime precifely afraid,
fimply to confefTe the trueth , becaufc they fcarc leaft they fliould fo
open a windowe to wickednes,to (peke irreuerenily of the workcs of
God.Which fobriety as I cmbrace,fo I ihinke it nothing;daijgerous,
if we fimply holde what the Scripture teacheth . Auguiline himfclfe . ., .
fomtinnc was not free fr5 y fuperftition,as where he faythjthat hard- .,.,.'.
ningc and blindinge , pertainc not to the worke of God , but to his ddk.Sc
foreknowlcdge.ButthephrafesofScripture allow not ihefe futttlt:ies,g»at.
which phrafcs do plainly fhewe that there is therin fomevvhatelfe of
Godjbefides his foreknowledge . And Auguftine himfelfe in his Hft
booke againft Iulianus,goeth earncftly about with a long proccfl>,to
proue that finnes arc not only of the pcrmiflion or fufFerance of God,
but alfo of his power.that fo former finnes might be punifhed. Like-
wife,tha: which they bring foorthiConcerningpermiflion,is to weakc
to ftande. It is oftentimes faydjthat God blindeth and hardeneth the
rcprobate,that he turncth,boweth,& moueth their hearts as I hauc
clfe where taught more at large. But of what manner that is,it is ne-
uer exprefledjif weflee to free foreknowledge or fuffeiance.Therfore
we anfwere that it is done after two manners,For hrfl:,wherc as wlien
his light is taken away , there remayneth nothing but darkentifc and
blindnes:vvheras when his fpirite is take away, our hcartes waxc haid
& become ftones : where as when his diredion cefleth, they are wra-
fted into crookednes,it is wel fayd that he doth bhndc,harden & bow
them fro whom he taketh away the power to fee, obey & do rightly.
The fecond maner,which cometh nere to the property oFthe words,
is that for the executing of his iudgementes by Sathan the minifter of
his wrath, he both appointeth their purpofes to what end it pleafcth
him,and ftirrcth vp their willes,& ftrengtheneth their cndcuours. So
when Moifcs rchearfeth that king Sehon did not giue pnfiage to the d^u. :,
pcople,becaufe God had hardrled his rpirit,& made his hart obftinate, 30.
he byandby adioyneth the end of his purpofe : that he might (fayth
he)giuehim into our handes. Therfore becaufe it was Gods will to
haue him deftroied,tlie making of his heart obftinate, was Gods pre-
paration to his deftrudion.
4 After the firft manner this (eemcth to be fpokcn . He taketh a*" j ^
way the lip from the fpeakers of trueth , and taketh away rcafon from j^^ *
P iii;.
Cap.4. Of the knowledge of
the tldcrs. He takcth the heart away from them that arc (ctoucr the
fay.tf J people,he makcth them to wander where no way is. Again, Lord why
7. haft thou niadc vs mad, and hardened our heart , that we (hould not
fcare thee ? Becaufe they iudge rather of what forte God maketh men
by forfakinge them , than how he performeih his worke in them. But
there are other teftimonies that go furtherras are thefc of the hardc-
xo 4 "'"» ^^ Pharao . I will harden the heart of Pharao , that he do not
i.ii 7. heare you,& let the people go. Afterward he faithjthat he hath made
.& 10. hcauy and hardened his heart. Did he harden it, in notfufteiningc it>
That is true in deedcbut he did fomewhat more,that he committed
his heart to Sath3n,to be confirmed with obftinacy . Whereupon he
Ixo. J. had before fayd-.I will hold his heart.The people went out of itgypr,
5* the inhabitantes of that countrey came forth and met them hke enc»
q"^ * mies.By whom were they ftirrcd vp ? Trucly Mofes affirmeth to the
'fa. lo J pooplcjthat it- was the Lord that had hardened their heartes. And the
.5. Prophet recitmg the fame hiftory, faith , that he turned their beans,
that they (hould hate his people. Now can you not fayjthat they ftu-
bled being left without the counfell of God.For if they be hardened
and rurnedjthen they are of purpofe bowed to that fclfe rhing.Morc-
ouer Co oft as it plcafed him to punifh the tranfgreflTours of the peo-
plejhow did he performe his worke in the reprobate ? fo as a ma may
fecjthat the effcduallnes of working was in him,& rhey only did fer-
^«y 5' uice as minifters.Wherfore fomtimc he threarcned that he would cal
g*^^* the out with his whiftlejfometimcythey (houldbelikea netforhim
ize. 12. to entangle them, & fomume like a m.iilet,to ftnke the Ifraehccs.But
J.& 17 fpecially he then declared how he is not idle in them, when he called
^ ' Sennacherib an Axe, which was both direded and driuen by his hand
"* ^°' to cut. Auguftiac in one place doth not amifle , appointe it after this
•fa. lo. forteithat inafmuch as they finne,itis theirownetinafmuchasinfin-
5« ningc they do this or that, it is of the power of God, that diuided the
)e prx darkcneffe as pleafethhim.
.*j^ A f Now that the miniftcry of Sathan is vfed to pricke forward the
reprobate, fo oft as the Lord by his prouidence appointeth them to
this or to that,may fufficiently be proued , though it were but by one
.Sa.i5. place only.For it is oftentimes fayd in Samuell,that the euill fpirit of
nd 18. the Lord, and an euill fpirite from the Lord, did either violently cary
'^&^*9 orleaue Saul. To fay that this fpirit was the holy Ghoft,is blafphc-
mous.Therfore the vncleanc fpirit is called the fpirit of God, becaufe
it anfwcreth at his comaundement and power,being rather his inftru-
Tbef. ^^^ '" domgjthan an author of it felfe.This is alfo to be added with-
al!^ which Paul teachech, that the efficacy of crrour and dccciuinge is
fent
God the Kedemcr. Lib.2 . 117
fcnt by Godjthat they which hauc not obeyed the truethjmay belcuc
lies. But there is alway great difference in one felfe fame worke, be-
twenc that which the Lorde doeth , and that which Sathan and the
wicked go about. He maketh the euill inftrumentes that he hath vn-
dcr his hand,and may tuine whether he hft,to ferue his iuftice.They, ^
in as much as they are euill, do bring fourth in efFcd the wickedneflc
that they haue conceiued by corruptnefle of nature.The refte,of fuch
thmges as ferue for to deliuer the maicftieof God from (laundcr,and
to cut of ^l fhifting from the wicked , are already fet fourth in the
chapter concerning Prouidencc. For in this place my purpofc was
onely to fhewe how Sathan reigncth m the reprobate man, and how
God worketh in them both.
6 Although we haue before touched,yet it is not plainely decla-
red what hbertie man hath in thofe doingcs J which are neither iuft
nor faulty of them felues , and belong rather to the bodely than the
rpiriruall life. Some in fuch thinges haue graunted him free eledion,
rather^, as I thinke , bccaufe they woulde not ftriue about a matter of
no great importance , than that they minded certainely to pioue the
fame thing that tjiey graunt. As for me.although I confefle that they
which do holde that they haue no power to nghteoulhefle, do holdc
the thing that is principally necefTarie to faluation : yet I do fhmke
that this point alfo is not to be negleded , that we may know that it
is of the fpeciall grace of the Lorde , fo oft as it cometh m our mindc
to chofe that which is for our profit, fo oft as our will enchneth ther-
unto : againe fo oft as our wit and mmdc efchueth that whiche els
woulde haue hurte vs. And the force of Gods prouidence extendeth
thus farrc,not only to make the iuccefles of thinges to come to paffe,
as he (hal t'orfee to be expedicntjbut alfo to make the willes of men to
tendc therunto.Truely if we confider in our wit the adminiftration of
©utwarde thinges,we fhall thinke that they are Co farre vnder the will
of man : but if we fhall geue credit to fo many teftimonies, which eric
out that the Lord doth m thcfe thinges alio rule the heartes of men,
they fhall compellc vs to yelde our will fubied to the fpeciall mouing
of God. Who did procure the good willes of the Egyptians to the If- pj^^^ ,j
raelites , to lendc them all their mott precious iewels ? They woulde j,
ncuer haue founde in their heartes to haue fo done of their ownc ac-
corde. Therfore their heartes were more fubied to the Lord,than ru-
led by them felues. Andtruelyiflacob had not bene pcrfuaded that Qg^..
God put into men diuerfe affedions as pleafeth him , he woulde not 14.
haue faid of his fonne lofeph, whom he thought to be fome Heathe
Egyptian : God graunt you to tindc ipercie before this man. As alfo
Cap! 4. Of the knowledge of
>ra lO^ the whole Church confefleth in the Pfalme, ihac whe it pjcafed God
y^' to haue mercie vpon ic , he meckened the hcartes of the crucll na-
Sani. ''o"5- AgainCjwhen Saul fo waxed on fire with anger , that he prepa«*
[1.6. red him to warre,the caufe is cxprcfled/or that the fpintc of God did
enforce him. Who turned away Abfolons minde from embracing the
v Sam. counfell of Achitophci , which was vvonc to be holden as an oracle ?
[of. i°* ^^^ inclined Rchabeam to be perfuaded with the yong mens ad-
Uui.i6 uife ? Who made the nations that before were great, to be afrayde at
16. thecomyngof Ifraell ?Truely the harlot Rahab confelfed'jthat it was
done by God. Agame, who threw downe the hartcs of Uracil with
CU.2 Jj^jjI and fearfulneffe , but he that in the lawe threatened that he ^
woulde geuc them a fearefull hearte ?
7 Some man will take exception and fay, that thefe are fingular
examples , to the rule wherof all thinges vniuerfaliy ought not to be
reduced. But I fay , that by thefe is fufficiently proued that which I
affirme,that God fo oft as he meancth to prepare the way for his pro-
uidence, euen in outwarde thinges doth bow and tourne the willes of
men, and that their choifc is not fo free , but that Gods will beareth
rule oucr the freedome therof. That thy minde hangcth rather vpon
themouingof God, than vpon the freedome of thine ownechoife,
this dayly experience fliall compell thee to thinke whether thou wilt
or no : that is , for that in thinges of no perplexitie thy iudgemcni
and wit oft failcih thee, in thinges not heard to be done thy courage
fainteth : againe in thinges moft obfcure , byandby prefent aduife is
offrcd theerin thinges great & perillous, thou haft a courage ouerco"
_ ming all dilficultie. And lb do I expounde that which Salomon faicth:
J J * That the eare may hearc , that the eye may fee , the Lord worketh
Prou.ai both. Forltakeit that he fpeaketh not of the creation, but ofthc
!• fpeciall grace of vling them. And when he writeth that the Lord hoi-
deth in his hande and boweth whether he will the hearte of the king
as the ftreames of waters: truely vndcr the example of one fpeciali
forte, he comprehendeth the whole generalcie . For if the will of any
man be free from fubiedion, that preeminence principally belongeth
to the will of a King, which vfcth as it were a kingdomcvpori the
willes of other : but if the will of the King be ruled with the hande of
. ., J God, no more fliall our will be exempted from the fame cftate.Vpon
this point there is a notable faying of Auguttine .. The Scripture if it
gratia
5i libe be diligently looked vpon doth iliew, that not onely the good willes
rb arb of men whichhe of cuill maketh good , and fo beyng made by him
id Va- p^i^g JqjI^ dired to gooddoinges and to etcrnall life , but alfo thefe
j*^Q ^*"' willes that prcfcrue the creature ofthc worlde , are fo in the power of
God,
GodtheRedemcr. Lib.2. ii8
God , that he maketh them to be indined whether he will and when
he will,either f o do benefites, or to execute punifhemetes,by a iudgc-
mcnc moft fecret in deede,but ihe fame inoft righteous.
8 Here let the Readers rcmcmber,rhat the power of mans will is
not to be vveyed by the luccefle of thingeSjwhich Tome vnfkilful men
are vnorderiy wont to do. For they feme to them (elues to p roue
trimly and wittely that mans will is in bond.igc , becaufe eucn the
hyeft Monarches haue not all thinges flovvyng after their owne de»
fire. But this power wherof we fpeakcjis to be confidered within man
and not be meafured by outwarde fucccfl'e. For in the difpotacion of
frcewil,this is not to the queftio, whether man may foroutwardeim-
bediriientes, perfourme and put in execution all thot thinges that he
narh purpofed in minde : but whether he haue in euery thing both a
free eledion of ludgemcnc , and a free aflfedion of will, which both if
man haue , then Attilius Regnlus , enclofed in the narrowenefle of a
tonne,fct full of {harp prickes.llial no leflTe haue free will than Augu-
ftus Cefar, gouerning a great part of the worlde with the beckc of his
countenaunce.
The V. Chapter.
^ confittacien of the obieEiiom that are went te be br ought
for defence cf Free will.
-wpT might feme that v/e haue faide enough already, concerning the
. S bondage of mans will, if they that with falle opinion of iibertie,
\ labour to throw it downe hedlong , did not on the contrary part
"^pretcnde certaine leafons to aflaile our me-aning. Firft they heape
vp together diucrfe abfurdities , whereby they may bring it in hatred
as a thing abhorring from common reafon : afterwarde they fet vpon
it with tciiunonies of Scripture. Boththefe engines we {hall bcatc
backc in order. If (fay they) Sinne be of nece{litie5 then cefleth it to
be (inne : if it be voluntarie, then may it be auoydcd . Thefe were alfo
the weapons of Pelagius to alTaile Auguftine , with whofe name we
will not yet haue them oppre{fed, till v/e haue fatisfied them, concer-
ning the matter it felfe.I deny therfore that finnc ought the lefle to be
imputed, becaufe it is neceflarie. I denie againe that this doth follow
which they conclude,that it may be auoyded, becaufe it is voluntarie.
For if any man will difpute with God , and feeke to efcape from his
judgement by this pretenfe , becaufe he coulde none otherwife do:
God hath that anfwere ready which we in an other place haue fpoken ^
of, that it is not of creation,but of the corruption of nature that men
being made bondilaues to J[inne,can will nothing but euilFor whece
Cap.j. Of the knowledge of
Cometh this want of power which the wicked would gladly pretcndc,
but vpon this,thac Adam of his ownc accorde made him lelfe fubied
to the tyrannic of the Deuill ? Hereupon therefore grewe the corru«
pnojWith the bondes wherof we are holden faft tyed,for that the firft
man fell from his creator. If all men be luftly holde giliy df bis falling
away,let them not thinke them fclues excufed by necclTitie* in which
it felfe they haue a mod euidenc caufc of their dampnation. Andthif
I hauc aboue plainely fet fourth , and I haue geuen an example in the
Deuill him felfe, whcrby it might appeare , that he which neceflarely
(inneth, doth ncucrthelefle willingly finne ; as againe in the eled An-
gels , where as their will can not decline from good , yet it cefTcth '
er. 8i. not to be a will.. Which fame thing Bernard alfo aptly teacheth : thai
a Can. vvc arc therefore the more miferable, bccaufe our neceflfuie is volun-
taric : which yet holdcth vs fo fubie<S vnto jt , that we be the bonde-
flaues of finne,as we haue before rehearfed.The fecond parte of their
argument is faulty, becaufe from voluntaric it ftreightway leapeth to
free : but we haue before proued,that it is voluntarely done which yet
is not fubied to free eledion.
X They further fay : that if both venues and vices proccde not of
free choife of will, it is not reafonable that either punifhmentfhould
be laide vpon man or rewarde geuen to him.This argumentjalthough
it be Ariftotles , yet I graunt is in fome places vfed by Chryfoftome
and Hierome . But that it was a common argument with the Pela-
n Epi- gJans, Hierome him felfe hideth nor, & alfo rehearfeih it in their own
lol. ad wordes. If the grace of God worke in vs : then it, not we that labour,
rtefi. {halbc crowned.Of punifhmentes I aunfwerejthat they are iuftly laid
|hon.& ypQp vs from whom the giltinefle of finne procedeth.For what mat-
* ter maketh it , whether finne be done by free or bonde iudgemenc,
fo it be done by voluntarie luft : fpecially fith man is hereby proued a
finner, for that he is vnder the bondage of finne ? As to the re wardes
of righteoufnefle ; a great abfurditie forfoth it is , if we confeflc that
they hang rather vpon Gods bountifullneffejthan vpon our owne de-
feruinges . How oft finde we this thing repeted in Auguftinc : that
God crouneth not our deferuinges, but his owne giftesrand that they
are called rewarde s , not as due to our deferuinges , but fuch as are
reiidred to the graces already beftowed vpo vs? Wifely in dcede they
note thisj that now there remaineth no place for deferuinges , if they
come not out of the foutaine of free wilhbut where they recken that
which we fay fo farre differing from trueth they are much deceiued.
n Pfal. For Auguftine doubteth not, commonly to teach for neceflariejthat
I ** which (hey thinke fo vnbwcfull to confefle, as where he faith : What
be
God the Redemcr. Lib. 2. up
be the mcrites of any men what foeucr they be ? when he commctb,
no: with due rewarde , but with free grace , then he alone being free,
and that makeih free from finne ? He findeth all men (inners. Againe, j^ ^^
If that fhall be rendred to thee that is due to thee, thou arte to be pu- 70.
nyfhed : what is done then ? God hath not geucn thee punyfhcment
which is due, but geueth thee grace which is not due. If thou wilt be
eftraungcd from grace, boafte of thy deferuinges. Againe : Thou art
nothing by thy felfe. Sinnes are thine, but deferuinges are Gods, pu- ^piftol.
nyfhment is due to thee:and when rewarde commeth,he fiiall crowne ^^V j *
his owne giftes,and not thy deferuinges. And in the fame meaning in Apofto,
an other place , he tcacheth that grace is not ofdeferuing , but delcr- Sermo,
uing of grace . And a little after he condudeih , that God with his 4 7*
giftes goeth before all deferuinges , that out of the fame he may ga-
ther his owne deferuinges, and doth geue altogether freely.bycaufe he
findeth nothing whercvpon to faue . But what neede is it to make a
longer regifter,when fuch fentences are often founde in his writinges?
But the A poftle (hall yet better deliuer them from this error, if they i.cor.4
heare from what beginning he conueyeth the glorie of the Saintes : 7.
Whome he hath chofen, them he hath called : whome he hath cal-
led , them he hath iuftificd : whome he hath iuftified , them he hath
glorified. Why then,as witneflTeth the Apoftle,are the faithfull crow-
ned ? bycaufe by the Lordes mercy and not by their owne endcuour
they are both chofen and called and iuftified . Away therefore with
this vaine feare , that there (hall no more be any deferuinges , if free
Will ftiall not ftande. For it is moft foolifli to be frayed away and to
flee from that to which the Scripture calleih vs.Iff faith he) thou haft i.Cor.4
receyued all thinges , why gloryeft thou,as if thou haddeft not recey- 7.
ued them ? Thou fecft that for the fame caufe he taketh all thinges
from free will, to leaue no place for deferuinges : but as the bountie-
fullnelTe and libcralitie of God is manyfolde , and impoffible to be
fpentout, thofe graces which he bcftowcth on vs,bycaufe he maketh
them ours, he rewardeth as if they were our owne vcrtues.
5 Moreouer they bring fourth that which may feeme to be ta-
ken out of Chryfoftome : If this be not the power of our will , to ^^ ^
choofe good oreuiljthen they that are partakers of the fame nature, 1. in
muft either all be cuill or all be good . And not farre from that is he. Gen.
what foeuer he was,that wrote the booke Of the calling of the Gen-
tyles, which is carried about vnder the name of Ambrofe , when he Lib. t,
maketh this argument , that no man fhoulde euerdeparte from the cap. 4,
faith , vnlefle the grace of God did leaue vnto vs the ftate of mutabi-
litie:wherin u is marueile, that fo exccUec men fell bcfide them feiues.
Cap.5. Of the knowledge of
For how chauceth it came nbt in Chryfoftomes min(ie,that it isGods
cleftion that fo maketh difference betwene men ? As for vs,we fearc
not to graunt that which Paule with great earncftnefle affirmeth,that
all together arc peruerfe and geuento wickedneflTe : but with him wc
adioyne this thu by Gods mercy it commeth to palTe that all abide
not in perucifenefle . Therefore wheras naturally we are ail ficke of
one dileafe , they onely recouer htahh vpon whome it hath pleafed
God to lr«y his healing hande. The reft whome byiuft ludgement he
palfeth ouerpine away in their own roitenndle till they be coiumed.
Neither is it of any other caufe, that foine contyne w to the ende, and
fome fall in their courfe begon. For continuaunce it felFc is the gift of
Godjwhich he geucth not to all indjffercntlyjbut dealeth it to whom
it pleafeth him felfe. If a manaskc for a caufe of the difference , why
fome continew coiift.intly,and fome faile by vnftedfaftnc(fe,we know
none other caufe but that God iuftcyneth the one forte itrcnghthc-
ncdwith his power that they periOi not, and doth not gcue the fime
ftrengthe to the other forte , that they maie be examples of incon-
ftancie.
4 Further they prefle vs, faying, that exhortations are vainely ta-
ken in hande, that the vfc of admonitions is fuperfluous, that it is a
funde thing to rebuke, if it be not in the power of the (inner to obey.
When the like thinges in time paft were obieded againft Auguftine,
he was compelled to write thebooke of Correption and grace. Where
although he largely wipe them away , yet he bringech his aduerfaries
to this fumme : O man , in the commaundtmentlcarne what thou
oughiefttodo: in corredion learne that by thine owne faulte thou
haft it not: in prayer learne whenfe ihou maieft receiue that which
thou wouldtft haue. Of the fame argument in a maner is the booke
of the Spirite and Letter, where he teacheth that God mcafureth
notthe commaundemcntesof hislavve by the ftrength ofman, but
when he;hath commaunded that which is right, he fireely geueth to
his eled power to fullfili it. And this is no matter of long difputation,
Firft we are not onely in this caufe , but alfo Chi ift and all the Apo-
ftles. Now let the other looke how they will get the mayfterie in ftri-
Uing , that matche them felues with fuch aduerfaries . Doth Chrift,
which teftyfieth that we can do nothing without him ^ any thing the
lefl'c rebuke and chaftice them , that without him did euill ? Doth he
Icfie exhorte eucry man to applie hitn felfe to good workes ? How fe-
ucrcly doth Paule inuey againft the Corinthians for negleding of
>"^' charitic? and yet he prayeth for charitie to be geuento the fame men
,6, ' from God. He teftifieth in the Epiftle to the RomaincSj that it is nei-
ther
God the Redemer. Lib.2, 120
thcrofhimthacwilleth, nor ofhim that runneth, but of God that
hath mercy , and yethe ceiTeth not afterwardc to admonifli, to cx-
horte and to rebuke.Why do they not therefore fpeake to the Lorde,
that he do not fo lofe his labour in requiring of menne thofe thinges
which he him felfe alone can geue , and in punifliing thofe thinges
which are done for wante of his grace ? Why do they not admonifh
Paule to fpare them > in whofe power it is not to will or to runne, -,
but in the mercie of God , going before them which nowe hath for- * -
fakcn them ? As if the Lorde had not a very good reafon of his doc-
trine, which offreth it felfe redily to be founde of ihem that reucrent-
Jy feekc it , but howe much dodrine 3 exhortation and rebuking do
worke of themfelues,to the chaungingof the mindCjPaule dcclareth,
when he wriceth , that neither he that planteth is any thing , nor he
that watereth, but the Lord that gcueth the encreafe onely efFedually
woiketh. So we fee that Mofcs feucrally ftablifheth the commaunde-
mentes of the lawe , and the Prophetes do (harj^ely call vpon them,
and threaten the tranfgreflbrs, whereas ihcy yet confefle, that men do
then onely waxe wife, when a hearte is giuen them to vnderfland,that
it is. the propre worke of God to circumcife the he;j|rtes, and in (teede
of ftony hcartes to geue hearts of fle(h,to wrice his law in the bowells
of menne : finally in renewyng of foules to make that his dodrinc
may be effeduall.
5 Wherfore then ferue exhortations ? For this purpo(e:ifthey be
defpifed of the wicked with an obftinate heart, they fhal be for a wit-
nefle vnto them when they fhall come to the iudgemcnt feate of the
i-orde , yea and euen nowe alreadie they beate and ftrike their con-
fcience: for howefoeuer the moftfrowarde man laugheththem to
Icorne j yet can he not difproue them : but thou wilt fay , what may
filly miferable man do , if the foftenelTe of hearte , which was necef-
farily required to obedience5be denied him? Nay rather, why doth he
cxcufe him felfe,whcn he can impute the hardenelTc of heart to none
but to him felfe ? Therefore the wicked that are willingely ready to
mocke them out if they might, are throwen downe with the force of
them whether they wil or no.But the chiefe profire towarde the faith-
full is to be confidered: in whomc as the Lord workcth all thinges by
his fpirite, fo he leaueth not the luftrumentes of his worde,and vfctb
the fame not without efted. Let this therforc ftandc which is true,
that all the fttegth of the godly refteth in the grace of God,according
to that faying of the Prophet : 1 will geue them a newc hearte that Ezec.ii
they may walke in them . But thou wi!c faie : Why are they nowe *^'
admoniilied of their duetid and not rather left to the dircdion of the ,
Cap.y, Of the knowledge of
holy Ghoft ? why are they moued with exhortation , (jth ihcy can
make no more haft than the ftirring forwarde of the holy Ghoft wor-
kech ? why are they chaftifed if at any time they be gone out of the
way , fith they fell by the neceflary weakeneffe of the flefti > O man,
what art thou to appoint a law for God ? If it be his pleafurejthat wc
be prepared by exhortation to recciue the felfe fame gracCjWherby is
wrought that the exhortation is obeied , what haft thou in this ordrc^
to bite or carpeac? If exhortations and rebukinges did nothing els
profit with the godly, bur to reproue them of (inne , they were euen
" for that thing only to be compted not altogether vnproficablc.Now,.
forafmuch as by the holy Ghoft working inwardly, they much auail^
to enflame the defire of goodneife , to ihake of (luggiftinefle , to take
away the pleafure and venimous fwetenefle of wickednelfe, and on
the other fide to engendre a hatred and irkefomnclTc therofwho dare
cauili that they are fuperfluus? If any man require a plainer aunfwcrc,
let him take this: ^od worketh after two fortes in his eledc, in*
wardely by his fpirite, oii^twardely by his worde : By his fpiritc,by en-
lightning their mindes , by framing their hearies to the loue and kc-
ping of iuftice , h%maketh them a newe creature : By his worde , he
ftjrrcth them to dtfire, to feke and atteme the fame renuing: by them
both he fneweth fourth the effeftual working of his hande,according
to the proportion of his diftribution.When he fendeth the fame word
to the reprobate , though not for their amendement,yet he maketh it
to ferue for an otjjer vfe : that both for the piefent time they may be
prefled with witnefTe ofconfcience,and may againft the day of iudee-
lohn 6, ment be made more inexcufable . So though Chrift pronounce that
44. no man commcth to him,but whom the Father draweth,and that the
cled do come when they haue heardc and learned of the father ? yet
doth not he negled the office of a teacherjbut with his voice diligent-
ly calleth them, whome itneceffarily behoueth to be inwardly taught 4
j.Cor. ^y ^^^ ^°'^y Ghoft , that they maie any thing profile. And Paulc tea-
cheth,that teaching is not in vaine with the reprobate, bycaufe it is to |
them the fauour of death to death,but a fwetc fauour to God.
6 They be verie laborious in heaping together of teftimonics of
Scripture : and that they do of purpofe , that whtn they can not op-
prefle vs with weight, they maie yetVvith numbre. But as in battclles,
when it commeth to hand ftrokes , the weaker multitude how much
pompe and (hew foeucr it hath, is with a fcwc ftripes difcomfited and
put to flight: fofhallitbeverycafy forvs to ouerthrowe them with
all their route.For,bycaufe the places that they abufe againft vs,when
they are ones diuided into their ordres,do tneete vpon a fcwe fpeciall
poimesi
2,l6.
God theRedemer. Lib.2 , 121
j>oIntcs,wc (hall with one aunfwere faty (Be many of them : therefore
it fliallnot be nccdefull to tarry vpon diflbluing euery one of f hem
partfcularly. Their chiefe force they fet in the commaundementes,
which they thinke to be fo tempered to our ftrengthcs, that what
foeuer is proued to be required by the one , it neccffanly fol-
lowerh that it may be perfourmcd by the other. And therefore they
runne througheuery of the commaundementeSj& by tliem do mea-
fure the proportion of our ftrength.For (fay they) either God moc-
keth vs when he chargeth vs with holynelTe, gocilyneflTe , obedience,
chaftitie , loue, and mekenefle : and when he forbiddtth vs vnclcan-
ncflejidolatriejvnchaftcnelfe, wrath, robberie, pride, and fuch like : or
he requireth onely thofe thinges that are in our power . Nowe , wc
may diuide into tliree fortes in manner all the commaudcmentes that
they heape together. Some require our firft conuer(ion to God,(ome
fpeake (imply of the keping of the lawe : fbme commaunde vs to
cocinue in the grace of God that we hauc rcceywed.Firftlct vs fpeake
of them all in generalitie,and then defcendc to the fpeciall fortes. To
cxtende the power of inan to the commaundementes of the law,liath
in deedc long agoe begonne to be commune , and hatf» fome (hewe :
but it preceded from moft rude ignorauncc of the lawe.For they that
thinke it a heynous offence , if it be faide that the keping of the lawe
is impodible , do reflt forfoth vpon this moH (trong argument , that
ells the lawe was geucn in vaine . For they fpeake in fuch forte as if
Paule had no where fpoken of the lawe. For, I befeecne them, what
meane thefc fayinges, that the lawe was fet bycaufe of tranf^relTions:
That by the lawe is the knowledge of (inne : That the lawe makcth cala. t.
finne : that the lawe entrcd, that finne might aboundc : was it meant i o,
that the lawe was to be limited to our f^rengthcs , leaft it fhouldc be ^°^- 3
gcuen in vaine ? or rather that it was fet farre aboue vs to conuincc l^'
our weakcnefle ? Truely by the fame mans definition , the cnde and _"'"' ^*
fullfilling of the lawe is Charitie. But when he wifhcth the mindcs of i,Tim.
the Theffalonians to be filled with charitie , he doth fufficicmly con- i-5 •
feffe^ that the lawe foundeth in our cares without profile, vnlelTe '•*^^*^
God infpire the whole fumme thereof in our heartes. ^"^ **
7 Truely,if the Scripture did teach nothing ells, but that the law
is a rule of life where vnto we ought to frame our endeuour,! woulde
alfo without delay agree to their opinion : but whereas it doth dili-
gently and plainely declare vnto vs the manyfolde vfe of the lawe: it
is conuenient rather to con(ider by thatinterpretation,what the lawe
may do in man. Forfo much as conccrneth this prefentecaufe: it
teachcth that fo fone as it hath appointed what we ought to do , the
Cap. 5. Of the knowledge of
power to obey commcch of the goodneflTe ot God , and therefore
moucth vs to prayer > whereby we may reqaire to haue it giucn vs. If
there were oneiy the commaundemcntand nopromifei then were
oui ftrength to be tried whether they were fufficicm to au^nlwere the
commaundcment, but fith there ar^ promifes ioyned withaU, whichc
crie our, that nor onely our aide j but alfo all our whole power con(i-
fteth in the heipe of Gods grace , they do teftifie enough and more,
that we are ahogether vnfitte, much more infufficient to kcpc the law.
Wherfore let this proportion of our ftrengthes with the commaunde-
mentes of Gods la we be no more enforced,as if the Lord had meafu-
red the rule of iuftice, which he purpofed to geue in his lawe, accor-.
dmg to the rate ofour weakeneCe. Rather by his promifes we ought
to confider, how vnready we are ofour fclues which in eucry behalfc
do fo much neede his grace. But who ( fay they ) (hall be perfwaded
that it is like to be true , that the Lorde appointed his lawe to Aockes
and ftones ? Neither doth any man go about to perfwade it. For the
wicked are neither ftockcs nor ftones, when being taught by the lawc
that their luftes do ttriue againft God , they are proued gilty by their
owne witnefTe. Nor yet the godly, when being piK in minde of their
j„ E„ weakenefle J they flee vnto grace. For which purpofe ferue thefe fay-
chir. ad inges of Auguftine. The Lorde commaundeth thofe thinges that we
Lau. de can not do, that we may know what we ought to afke of him. Great
f*K ^ u ^^ ^^^ profire of the commaundementeis , if fo much be gcucn to free
c»vi6. ^'^^ > ^'^^^ ^^^ grace of God be the more honoured . Faith obtameth
Homel. that which the lawe commaundeth,yea the lawe therfore commaun^
asi. in deth,that faith may obtaine that which was commaunded by the law:
loan, y^^ Qq^ requirctli faith it felfe of vs,and findeth not what to requirei
Eoif 24 vnUfle he geue what to finde. Againe , Let God gcuc what he com-
* maundeth,andcommaunde whathewilL
8 That fliall more plainely be feen in reherfing the three fortes
J , ofcommaundcmenteswhkh we touched before. T he Lorde often-
,,. * * times commaundeth both in the lawe and in the Prophttes> that we
Icrc.ji. be conuerted vnto him But on the other (ide,rhe Prcyphet anfwereth,
'^- Comierte me, Lorde,and I fliall be conuerted .for after that thou didik
^^"^' conuerte me , I repented, &c. He commaundeth vs to circumcifethe
and' 5*o. vncitcumcifed f kinne of our heartc : and by Mofcs he declareih that
2 6. this circumcifion is done by his owne hande.He ech where requireth
Eze.35 newnefTeof hearte, butin anothcrplacehe teftifTerhthatitis geuen
•f b ri byhimfelfe. That 'which God promifeth ( faith Auguftine ) we do
D^ "" not by free will or nature, but he himfelfe doth it by grace. And this
ChriCj. is the fame note that he himfelfe reherfeth in the fifth place among
the
GodtheRedemer. Lib.2. 122
the rules of Ticonius, thai wc well make difference bccwenc the bwc
and the promifeSjOr betwenc the connnaundemenics and grace, Nov/
let them go, that gather by the commaundementes whether man be
able to do anything towarde obediences m fuch forte that they de-
ft roy the grace of God, by which the commaundemet^s them Iclues
ate fulfilled. The commaundtmcntcs of the feconde lorte are limpie,
by which wc are bidden to honour God , to ferue and cleai-.e vnto his
\^'ill, to kepc his commaundementes,to follow his dodnnc.But there
are mnumerable places that do ttftifie that it is his gific what foeuer
righteoufntfTe , holynefle , godhneffe or puritie may be had. Or the
thude forte was that exhortacion of Paulc and Barnabas to the faitij-
full, which IS rehcarfed by Lukc,that they fhoulde abide m the grace
of God . But from whence that ftrcnoth of conftancie is to be had,
the fame Paule tcncheth in an other placc.Thacrcmaineth,faieth he, Ephc.tf.
brethren, be ye ftrong through the Lorde . In an other place he for- ^ *•
biddeth vs, that we do not greue the (pinte of Gou.wherewith we are ^P"^ 4-
fealcd vp vnto the day of our redemption.But bccaufe the thing that
he there rcqoireth , coulde not be perfourmed by men , therefore he
wilheth it, to the Thcfialonians, from God , namely , that he woulde f^^f , ^
recken them worthy of his holy calling, and fulfill all the purpoic of
his goodneire,and the worke of faith in thcm.Likewifc in the leconilc ^
EjJiftle to the Corinthians, entreating of almcs , he ofientim< s com- ^[n/
mcndeth their good and godly will: yet a htle after, hcthaxikerh
God ibatputitin thchcarteof Tirus, to take vponhim togcueex-
horiacion.lf 't'icus coulde not fo much as vfc the office of his mouth
to exhorte other, but onely fo farrc as God did put it vnto hifn,how
fhoulde other haue bene willing to do, vnlefTc God him i^lfe had di-
rt^cd their heartcs ?
9 The craftier forte of them docauillat all thefe ttftimonies:
becaufe there is no impediment, but that wcmay ioyne ourowne
ftrenothes, and God to helpe our wcake endeuours. They bring alfo
places out of the Prophetes , where the eftcdof our conuertion fcc-
tncth to be parted in halfe betwene God and vs . Tourne ye to me, Zach,i»
and I will tourne to you. What maner of helpe the Lord bringeth vs, j-
we haue aboue (hewed , and it is not ncedefull here to repete it. This
one thing I woulde haue grauntcd me, that it isvainely gathered
that there is required in vs a power to fulfill the lawe , becaufe God
doth comiijaundc the obedience of it: Forasmuchas it is cuident,
that for the fulfilling of all the commaundementes o^ God, the grace
ofthelawegciieris both neccflai ie for vs & promifed vnto vs.Theic-
by then it appcarcth,ihat aileaft there is more required of vs than wc
Cap.5. Of the knowledge of
:r. 1 3 . arc able to payc. And that faying of Hiereroie can not be wiped away
with any cauiUationstthat the coucnaunt of God made with the aun-
cicnt people,was voidcjbecaufc it was oncly literall,and that it couldc
no othcrwife be llablifhed , than when thefpirite cometh vnto it,
which frameth the hcartes to obedience . Neither doth that faying,
Tourne ye to me,and I will toume vnto you,fauour their crrour. For
there is mean: , not that tourning of God, wherewith he renueth our
hcartes to repcntauncc , but wherewith he by profperitie of thinges
doth declare himfelfe fauorableand mcrcifulhas by aduerfiiie he
fbmetime {heweth his difpleafurc . Where as therefore the people
being vexed with many fortes of miferics and calamities, did com-
plaine that God was turned away from them : he aunfwereih , that
they (hall not be deftitute ofhisfauour, ifthcyretournc tovprighr-
neifeof hfe, and to him felfe that is the paterne of righteoufneflc:
Therefore the place is wrongfully wrefted , when it is drawen to this
purpofe 5 that the vvorke of our conucifion fhoulde fceme to be par-
ted betwixte God and men.Thefe thinges we haue comprehended Co
much the (hortelier, bycaufe the propre place for this matter fliall be
where we entreate of the Lavve.
ID The feconde forte of their argumentes is much like vnto the
6rft. They allege the promifes whereby God doth couenaunt with
itnosS' our wil.,of which forte are,Seeke good and noteuill,and ye (hall liue.
4' If ye will and do heare, ye fhal cate the good thinges of the carthrbut
if ye willnotjthe fwerde (halldeuoure you,bycaufe the Lordes mouth
hath fpoken it. Againe , If ihow put away thine abhominations out
/■ ^' of my fight, then llialt thou not be driuen out : If thou fhalt obey di-
cr. 4.1. ligently the voice of the Lorde thy God , and obferue and do all his
>cu. 1 8 commaundementes which I commaunde thee this day,then the Lord
thy God will fet the on hye aboue all the nations of the earth . And
^"** * other likeThey do inconueniently and as it were in mockeric thinkc,
that thefe benefites which the Lorde doth offer in his promifes , arc
aiTigned to our owne wihvnlefle it were in vs to ftablifli them or'make
them voide. And right eafy it is to amplifie this matter with eloquent
complaintes > that the Lorde doth cruelly mockc vs , when he pro-
nounccth that his fauourhangethvpon our will, if the fame will be
not in our power: And that this liberaUty of God fhould be a goodly
thing forforh,if he fo fet his benefits before vs that we haue no power
ro v(e them : and a mcrucilous affurednes of his promifes, which hag
vponathmgimpoflible, fo asrhey might neuer be fulfilled. But of
fuch promifes as haue a condition adiomed, we wil fpeakc in an other
place : fo that it (hall be plaine , that there is no abfurditic in the im-
pofllble
God the Rcdemer. Lib. 2. 123
poiifible fullfilling of them. And for fo much as concerneth this place:
I deny that God doth vngently mockc vs,when he moueth vs to de-
fcruc his benefices , whome he knoweth to be vtccrly vnablc to do it.
For whereas the promifes arc offered both to the faichfull and to the
wicked, they haue their vfe with both fortes. As God with his com-
maundemetes pricketh the confcieces of the wicked,that they fhould
not to fwetely take pleafurc in their (inncs , without any remem-
brance of his iudgementes: foin his promifes he doth in a manner
take them to witnefle, howe vnworthy they are of his goodnefle.
For who can denie that it is moft rightfull and conuenientc , that the
Lord do good to them of whome he is honored , and punifh the de-
fpifers of his Maieftyjaccording to his feueritie?Therefore God doth
well and ordrely, when in his promifes he adioyneth this condition to
the wicked that arc bounde with the fetters of finne , that they fhall
then only cnioy his benefites, if they departe from their wickedneffe:
or for this purpofc only,that they may vnderftand that they arc wor-
thily excluded from thcfe thmges , that are due to the true worfhip-
pcrsof God. Againe, bycaufc he feekcthby all meanes to ftirre vp
the faithfull to call vpon his grace, itfhall not be inconuenicnt , if he
attempt the fame thing alfo by promifes, which we haue fliewed that
he hath done to great profit with commaundementes towarde them.
Being enfourmed of the will of God , by his commaundementes , wc
are put in minde of our miferie , which do withall our hearte to farrc
diflent from the fame, and we be therewithal! pricked forward fo call
vpon his fpirite,whereby wc may be direded into the right waie. But
becaufe our fluggilhnelTe is not iufficiently fharpencd with commaii-
dementes, there arc added promifes which with a ccrtaine fwetetieflc
may allure vs to the loue of them. And that the more dcfire that we
haue of righteoufnefTe , wc may be the more feruent to fceke the fa-
uour of God. Loe howe in thefe requeftes^ ( If you will : If you rtiiill
heare,) the Lorde neither gcueth vs power to will nor to hearc , and
yet mocketh vs not for our want of power,
1 1 The third forte of their argumentes , hath alfo great affinitic '
with the two fourmer. For they bring fourth the places wherein God
rcprocheth the vnthankefuU people , and fayeth that they them fel-
ues onely were the caufe that they receyued not of his tender louc
allkindes of good thinges. Of which forte are thefe places. Amaleck Num.i,
and the Chananee are before you, with whofe fwcrdc you (hal fall^bc- '♦J*
caufe ye woulde not obey the Lorde, becaufe I called and ye aunfwe-
red not , I will do to this houfe as I did to Silo . Againe , this nation Icr. 3 \
hath noc hcarde the voyce of the Lorde their God , nor hath r^cey^ ^ i*
Cap.j. Of the knowledge of
xrc.32. ued difcipline, therefore it is caft away from the Lorde . Againe , be-
caufe ye haue hardened your hearte and wouldc not obey the Lorde,
all thele cuilles arc happened vnto you. Howe(ray they ) coulde fuch
reproches be laidc agamttthcm which might redely aunfwerc? As
for vs , wc loued proiperitic , and feared aduerfitie. But where as for
to obtcinc the one and auoyde the other we obeyed not the Lorde*
nor hearkened to his voice : this was the caufe thereof, for that it was
not at our iibertic fo to do, becaufe we were fubicd to the dominion
of h'nnc. Vainely therforc arc thefc euilles layde to our charge, which
it was no: in our power to auoyde. But leuing the pretenfe of neccfli-
vc, wherein they haue but a weake and fickly defence, I afke of them ^
whether they can purge them felues of all fault.For if they be found
gilty of any faulte ,then the Lprde doth not without caulc reprochc
thcm,that it came to palfe by their peruer fnelf.', that they felt not the
fruite of hfs clemcncie. Let them aunfwerc thcrforcwhether they can
denie, that their frowarde will was the caufe of their llubbournnefre.
It they finde the fpring head of the euiil within tliem felues,why gape
they to finde out foreme caufcs , that they might feme not to haue
bene nuthours of their owne deftrudion?Biit if it be true that by their
ownc fiulte and none others, finners are both depriued of the bcnc-
fitcs ot God , and chaftifcd with puni(hementes , then is there great
rea'on why they fhould heare thele reproches at the mouth of God:
th.n if they go obftinaily forwarde in their faultes , they may learnc
in their mileries rather to accufe and abhorre their ownc wicked-
neffe, than to bl.imc God of vniuft cruehie : that if they haue not caft
of all wiliingnefleto learne,they may be wery of their finnes, by the
deferuingcs whereof they fee them felues mifcrable and vndone , and
may rcrourne into the way , and acknowledge the fame with carneft
Dan.^. confcflion which the Lorde rchearfcih in chiding 'hem , For which
purpofe it appeareth by the folcmpne prayer of Daniel , which is in
the ninth Chapter , that thofe chidinges of the Prophetes which are
alleged , did auayle with the Godly . Of the firft vfe wc fee an exam-
ple in the lewes , to whome Hieremie is commaunded to declare the
caufe of their miferics, wheras yet it fhoulde not haue fallen othcr-
, ^ wife than the Lorde had forefaide. Thou flialt fpeake vnto them all
,- "* ' thefe wordcs,and they ihall not heare thee : thou (liait call them , and
they lh.il! not aunfwerc thee . To what endc then did they finge to
deafe men ? that being cuen loth and vnwilling , yet they Hioulde vn-
derftande that it was true that they hearde , that ir were wicked facri-
lege if they fhoulde lay vpon God the blame of their euils which rc-
fied in them felues. By thefe fewe folutions thou mayft cahly deliuer
thy
God theRedcmer. Lib.2. 124
thy felfe from the infinite hcape of teftimonics,which,for to cre(fl an
image of free will , the enemies of the grace of Goxi are wont to ga-
ther together J as well out of the commaundementes as out of the
proteftations againrt the profeflbrs of the law. It is reprochefully fpo- Pfa. yS,
ken in the Pfalme concerning the lewes: A frowardc gcneraucn that ^
haue not made their hearteftreight.Alfo in an other Pfalmejthe Pro- « ^^*
phctc exhorteth the men of his age, not no harden their hcartes, and
that bycaufe all the faulte of obllinacie remaincth in the perucrfneffc
of men. But it is fondely gathered therof, that the hearte is pliable to
either fide,the preparing wherof is onely of God.The Prophet faith: Pf. iiiju
I haue endincd my hearte to kcepe thy commaundementes : bycaufe ^ ' *•
he had willingely and with a cheerefull carneft affedion of mindc ad-
dicted himfelfe to God, and yet he doth not boaft him felfe to be the
author of his owne inchnatio, which he confefTah in the fame Pfalme
to be the gift of God.Therfore we muft holde in minde the admoni-
tion of Paule,v/here he biddeth the faithfull to worke their owne fal- PhiJ.».
uation with feare and trembling, bycaufe it is the Lorde that workcth * **
boch the willing and the perfourming . In deedc he afligneih them
offices, to be doing , that they fhoulde not geue them felucs to (lug-
gifhnelleof the flefli : but in that he commaundeth the to haue feare
and carefulnefle, he fo humbleth them,that they may remcmbre that
the fame thing which they are comaundcd to do^ is the proprc worke
ofGod, whcrin plainely he expre{reth,that the faithful worke,pa(Iiue-
ly , as I may fo call it , in fo much as power is miniftred them from
Heauen, that they (hould claime nothmg at ail to them felucs.VVhcr-
fore when Peter exhorteth vs that we ftiould adde power in faith , he i.'petr,
graunteth not vnto vs a feconde office , as if we fhoulde do any thing s«
feuerally by our felues,but only he awaketh the flothefuUnelTe of the
flelh, wherwith commonly faith it felfe is choked. To the fame pur-
pofe feemeth that faying of Paulc:Extingui(h noty fpirite,for flouth- i, iiieC
fullnefle doth oftentimes crepe vpon the faithfull , if it be not cor- » j>.
reded. But ifany man conclude thereupon, that it is in their owne
choife to cherifti the light being oflfred them, his ignoraunce (hall be
cafily confuted: bycaufe the felfe fame diligence that Paule rcqui- j.Cor.
rethjcometh onely from God.For wc are al(o oftentimes commaun- 7.
dcd to purge our felues from all filthyneflc : whereas the holy Ghoft
dotbe claime to him felfe alone the office ofmaking holy. Finally
that by way of graunting the fame tliingjis conueyed to vs that pro-
prely belongeth to God, is plaine by the wordes of lohn : Whofoe-
uer is of God,faueth him felfe. The aduauncers of freewill take holde ,.iob.c
of this faying , as if we were faued partcly by the power of God, 18.
Cap.5. Of the knowledge of
parcclybyourowne: as though we had not trom heauen the very
oh. 17. fame fafe keeping , wherof the Apoftle makcth mention . For which
5« . caufe,Chritt alfo praiech his Father to faue vs from cuil,anci we know
that the godly , while they warre againft Satan, do get the vidorie by
no other armurc and weap6s,buc by the armure and weapos of God.
,PgP^,^ Whcrfore when Peter commaundedvs, to purific our foules in the
ij. ' ' obedience of rruth,hcbyandbyaddcthas by way of corredion , (by
the holy Ghoft.) Finally ,how all mens Itrength are of no force in the
i.Ioh. I rpirituall battell , lohn briefely fheweth , when he fayeth , that they
^ which are begotten of God , can not finne , becaufe the fede of God
ulo'u.;. abidcth m them. And in an other place,he rendreth a reafon why ; for -
^ that our faith is th c vi<Sorie that ouercometh the worlde.
iz Yet there is alleged a teftimonie out ofthe law of Mofes, which
femcth to be much againft our faluation. For after the publilhing of
Dcu. 30 the law, he protcfteth vnto the people in this maner.The commaun-
i». dement that I commmaunde thee this day, is not hid from thee , nei-
ther farre of: It is not in hcauen,but harde by thee,it is in thy mouth
and in thy hearCjthou (houldeft do ic.Trudy if this be taken to be fpo-
ken of the bare comaundementes,! graunt they be of no fmal weight
to this prefent matter . For though it were eafy to mocke it out with
faying , that here is fpoken not of the eafinefle and redinefle of obfer-
uation, but of knowledge : yet euen fo , peraducnture it woulde alfo
R.om.10 icauc feme doubt. But the Apoftle which is no doubtfuUexpoIitour,
8. taketh away all doubt from vs.which affirmeth that Mofes here fpakc
of the dodrine of the Gofpell. But if any obftinace man will fay, that
' Paule violently wrefted thofe wordcs , that they might be drawenc to
the Gofpeh although his boldeneflc fo to fay ftial not be without im-
pictic, yet is there fufficiet matter bcfide the authoririe of the Apoftle
to conuince him withall.For if Moles fpake of the comaundementes
only, then he puffed vp the people with a moft vaine confidence. For
what fhould they els haue done,but throwen them felues down head-
long, if they had taken vpo them the keping of the lawe by their own
ftrength , as a thing not hard for them ? Where is then that fo ready
cafincfle to keepe the lawe, where there is no acceffc vnto it , but by a
hcdlong fall to dcftrudion? Wherfore there is nothing more certaine,
than that Mofes in thefe wordes did mcane the couenant of mercic,
which he had publifhcd together with the ftreight requiring of y law.-
Dcu. 3 o Pqi- in a few verfes before he had taught,that oar hcartes muft be cir-
cumcifed by y had of God,that we may loue bim.Therfore he placed
y eafineffcjWnerof he ftreightway after fpeaketh,not in the ftrcgth of
ina,but in y hclpe & fuccour of y holy Ghoft,w performeth his worke
mightely
GodtheRedemcr, Lib. 2. 125 /
mightcly in our weakcnclfe . Atbeit the place is not limply to be vn-
derftanded of the commaundementes , but raiher of the promifcs of
the Gofpell , whfch are fo farre from ftabliQiing a power in vs to ob-
cayne righteoufneflejthat they vtterly ouerthrow it.Paul confidering
that fame, proueth by this tcftimony,that faluation is offred vs in the
GofpelLnot vnder that hard and impofTibie condition, wherwiih the
law dealeth with vSjthat is, that they onely (hall attayne it which hauc
fulfilled all the commaundements, but vnder a condition that is cafie,
ready,and playne to come vnto. Therfore this tcftimooy makcth no-
thing to chalenge freedom to the will of man.
I J There are alfo certaine other places wot to be obieded,wher-
by is (hewed that God fomtime, withdrawing y fuccour of his grace,
trteth men,and way teth to fee to what end they will applie their cn-
deuours , as is that place in Ofee:I will go to my place till they put it
inxheir heart and ieckc my face. It were a fond thing (fay they)if the ^ '
Lord fhould confider whether Ifrad would feke his face.vnlefle their
mindcs were pliable that they might after their owne wil incline thc-
felues to the one fide or the other. As though this were not a thingc
commonly vfed with God in the Prophetes, to make a {hcwe as if he
did dcfpife and caft away his people,till they haue amended their life.
But what will the aduerfaries gather out of fuch ihreatningcs ? If
they meane to gather , that the people beinge forfaken of God, may
purpofe their owne filuation .- all the Scripture fhall cry out againft
them in fo doing . If they conkffc that the grace of God is neceff^ry ,
to conuer(]on,why ftriue they with vs ? But they fo graunt it necefla-
ry, thatftiUthey will haue mans power preferued vnto him. Howe
proue they that ? trucly not by this place,nor any like to it. For it it
one thing, to depart afide from man,and to looke what he will do be-
ing giuen ouer and left to himfelfe , and an other tbinge to helpe his
Iitlc ftrength after the meafure of his weakenefle . What then ( will
(bme man fayj do thefe manners of fpeaking meane?I aunfwere that
they are afmuch in efted,as if God had fayd: Forafmuch as I preuailc
nothing with this ftubborne people by admonifhinge,exhorting and
rcbukinge , I will withdraw my felfe a while : andhtte ftill and fuffer
them to be afflided : I will fee if at length , after longe miferies , they
will beginneto remember me, to fee ke my face . The Lordes gO"
ingc farre away,fignifieth the taking away of Prophecy : his lookingc
what men will do , lignificth that he keepinge filence , and as it were
hidmge himfelfe, doth for a time exercife them with diuerfeaffli-
dions. Both thefe thinges he doth to humble vs the more . For we
Aiouldc fooner be duUed than amended with the fcourges of aduer-
Cap. 5. Of the knowledge of
ncy,vniefl*e he did frame vs to that cradableneile by his Spirice.Mow
whereas the Lorde beinge offended , and in a manner weryed with
f our ob(iinate ftubbornnefle, doth not for a time ieauevs ( that is
by takingc away his word in which he is wont to geue vs a cer-
taync prefencc of himfelfe ) and doth make a proufe what we would
do in his abfencc, it is falfely gathered hereof that there is any
(Irength of free will that he fhould behold and trie,forafmuch as he
doth It to no other ende > but to driue vs to acknowledge our owne
being nothing.
14 They bringe alfo for their defence the continuall manner of
fpeakinge,thatis vfed both in the Scriptures and in the talke of men.
For good workes are called ours , and it is ^o leffe fayd that we do
the thing that is holy and pleafinge to God , tlian that we committc
linnes. But if (innes be iuOly imputed to vs , as proceedinge from vs*
truely in righteous doingcs alio fomewhat by the fame reafon oughc
to be afligned vnto vs . For it were againft reafon that it fhoulde be
fayd that we do thole thinges, to the doing whtrcof being vnable of
our owne moti6>we arc moued by God like ftoncs.Therfore though
we giue the chiefe parte to the grace of God , yet thcfe manners of
fpeaking do (hew that our tndeuour hath alfo yet a fecond parte . If
that thing onely were ftil cnforced,that good workes are called ours,
fit. *. I would obieft againe jthat the bread \i called ours , which we pray
to haue giuen vs of God . What will they get by the title of poflef-
(ion,but that by the bountifolnes & free gift of God, the fame thing
becorameth ours, which othcrwife is not due vnto vs ? Therefore ei-
ther lerte them laugh at the fame abfurdity in the Lordes prayer , or
let them nof rccken this to be laughed at , that good workes are cal-
led ourSjin which we haue \\^ property , but by the liberality of God.
But this is fomewhat ftronger 5 that the Scripture oftentimes affir-
meth that we our felues do worfliip God,obey the law & apply good
workes . Sith thefe are the dueties properly belonging to the mindc
and will : howc could it agree that thefe thinges are both referred to
the holy Ghoft, & alfo attributed to vs, vnlelfe there were a ccrtainc
communicatinge of our endeuour with the power of God ? Out of
thefe fnares we {hall eafily vnwinde oar felues, if we well confider the
manner how the fpiritc of the Lorde worketh in the holy ones. The
(imilitude wherwith they enuioufly preflTe vs is from the purpofcjfor
who is fo fonde to ihinke that the mouing of man differeth nothing
from the calling of a ftone ? Neither doth any fuch thinge follow of
our dodrine.We recken among the naturall powers of man, to allow
and rcfufe , to will and not wm , to,endcuour and to refill ^ that \%^ to -
allow
GodtheRedemer. Lib.2. 126
allowe vanity and torefufc pcrfed gooiine/Te , to wiUcuill and to be
vnwilhng to good , to endeuOur our felucs to wickedncflc and to rc-
fift righteoulncfTe. Wliat doth the Lord herein? If it be his will to vfc
that perucrfcntife as an inftrument of his wrath,hc diredeth and ap-
pointerh ic to what end he will, chat he by an euiil hand may execute
his good worke. Shall we then compare a wicked man that (o ferueth
the power oi^ God , when he labourcth onely to obey his owne luft,
to a ftonc that bcinge throwen by the violence of an other , is caried
neither with mouing nor fcnfe nor will of his owne?Wc fe how much
difference there is. But what doth he in good thinges,of which is our
pnncipall queft\on?when he eredeth his kingdom in them, he by his
ipiric tedrayncth mans will, that it be not caried vp and downe with
wandering lu{les,according to the inclination of nature:& that it may
be bent to holinefle and righteoufnefle, he boweth, frameth, fafhio-
nerh & dircdeth it to the rule of his righteoufnes : and that it fhould
not (tumble or fall,he doth ftibltHvand confirme it with the ftrength
of his fpiritc . For which rcafon Auguftine faythiThou will fay vn-
to me ; then we are wrought,and worke not. Yea thou both workeft
and art wrought , and thou workeft well when thou art wrought of
that which is good. The fpirite of God that worketh thee , helpeth
them that worke , and giueth himfelfe the name of a helper , for that
thou alfo woikeft fomewhat. In thefirft parte he teacheth,thatmanf
working is not taken away by the mouing of the holy Gboft,becau(e
will is ofnature,which is ruled to afpire to goodnclTc. But where he
byandby addeth , that by the name of help, may be gathered that w«
alfo do worke fomewhar, we ought not fo to take ir, as if he did giue
any thing feuerally to vs : but becaufe he woulde not chcrifh (louth-
fuHiuiTc in vs,he fo matcheth the working of God with ours , that to
will may be of nature, and to will well of grace . Therefore he fayd a
litle before, Vnltfle Ood helpe vs, we (hall not be able to ouercome,
no nor yet to fight at all.
I f Hereby appeareth,t!iat the grace of God (as the word is taken
when we fpeake of regeneration) is the rule of the fpiritcto dired &
gouerne the will of man. And it can not goucrne it, vnle(re it corrc^
it J rcforme it, and renew it ( from whenfe we fay that the beginninge
of regeneration is,that that which is ours might be deftroyed) & vn-
IfclTe it mouc it,ftirre it, driue it foi wardjCary it and hold it . Where-
upon we do tiucly (aVjthat all the doingcs that proceede flrom it, arc
wholly the only worke of the fame grace . In the meanc time we de-
nic not that it IS very true that Auguflincteacheth, that will is not
lienioycd by grace • but rather repayred . For both thefe thingcs do
Cap.5- Of the knowledge of
ftand very well together : that mens will be fayd to be rcftbrcd , when
the faultincfle and perucrfeneflc thereof being reformed, it is dircdcd
to the true rule of iuftice;and alfo that a new will be fayd to be crca"
ted in man^forafmuch as it is fo defiled and corrupted,that it needcth
vtterly to put on a new nature . Nowc is there no caufe to the con-
trary, but that we may well be fayd to do the fame thing that the fpi-
rit of God doth in vs , although our owne will do of it felfe giue vs
toward it nothing at all,that may be feucred from his grace. And thcr-
fore we muft kepe that in mind5whtch we haue dfewhere alleged our
of Auguttine , that fome do in vayne trauailc to finde in the will of
man fome good thinge that is properly her owne . For whatfoeuer
mixture men ftudy to bring from the ftrength of free wil to the grace
of God,it is nothinge but a corruptingc of it, as if a man would delay
wine with dirty and bitter water.But although whatfoeuer good is in
the wilof man,it proceedeth from y mere inftin^l of the holy Ghoft,
yet becaufe it is naturally planted in vs to will ^ it is not without caufe
faydjthat wc do thofe thinges whereof God chalengeth the praife to
himfelfe.Firftjbccaufcit is ours whatfoeuer by his goodnelfe he wor-
kcth in vs , (b that we vnderftaad it to be not of our fclues : and then
becaufe the minde is ours,the will is ourS^the endeuour is ours,which
are by hi"m direded to good.
x6 Thofe other teftimonics befide thefe , that they fcrape toge-
ther here and there , fhall not much trouble euen meane wit tes that
haue well conceiued onely the folutions aboue fayd.They allege that
Ge.4,7. fayJngowtofGenefis, Thine appetite (halbevnder thee, and thou
{halt beare rule ouer it. Which they expound of finne,as ify Lord did
promifc to Cam,that the force of finne fhould not get the vpper had
in his minde,if he would labour in fubduinge of it. But we fay that it
better agreeth with the order of the text,that tUis be taken to be fpo-
ken of Abell. For there Gods purpofe was to reproue the wickcdries
of the enuy that Cain had conceiued againft his brother. And that he
doth two wayes . One, that in vayne he imagined mifchiefe to excell
his brother in Gods fight , before whom no honor is giuen but vnto
righteoufneflc : the other , that he was to much vnthankefull for the
benefit of God which he had alrcdy receiued,which could not abide
his brother, although he had him fubieft vnder his authority . But
leaft we (hould feme therfore to embrace this expofitionjbecaufc the
other is againft vs : let vs admitte that God fpake of finne. If it be (o,
then God either promifeth or commaundeth that which he there de-
clareth. If he commaundeth,then haue wc already fiiewed that ther-
by followeth no proufc of the power of man. If he promifeih,wher«
is
GodtheRcdemcr, Lib.2. 127
IS the fulfilling of the promifc ? for Cain became fubieft to finne , o-
uer v^ich he fhould hauc had dominion. They wjU fay , that in the
promifc was included a fecrete condition,as if it had bin fayd,that he
ihould haue the victory if he would ftriuc for it. But who will receiuc
thcfe crooked compafles ? For if this dominion be meant of finnc,
then no man can doubt thatit is fpoken by way of commaundcmcnr,
wherein is not determined what we are able to do,but what we ought
to do, yea though it be aboue our power . Albeit both the matter
it felfc and the order of Grammer do require , that tliere be a com-
parifon made of Cain and Abcl,becaufe the elder brother fliould noc
haue bin fet behinde the yongcr , vnleiTe he had become worfe bjr
his owne wicked doing.
17 They vfe alfo the teftimony of the Apoftle,which faith,that it
is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth , but of God that Rom. >
harh mercy.Whcrby they gather that there is fomcwhatinmans will i^.
and endeuour, v/hich of it fclfe , though it be weakc , beingc holpen
by the mercy cf God,is not without profperous fuccefle. But if they
did foberly wey what matter Paulc there intreateth of, they wouldc
not fo vnaduifedly abufe this fentencc . 1 know that they may bringc
forth Origen and Hierome for maintainers of their expofition:and I LljAm
coulde on the other fide fct Auguftine againft them . But what they epitt.ad
haue thoughtjit maketh no matter to vs,if we know what Paul nneant ^?"^
There he teacheth that faluation is prepared only forthem,to whom ^IH^
the lord vouchfaueth to graunt his mercy : and that ruine and deftru- Pda,
^ion is prepared for all thofe that he hath not chofen.He had vnder
the example of Pharao declared the ftate of thereprobate,& had al-
fo confirmed the aflurednes of free cledion by the teftimony of Mo-
fesj will haue mercy vpon whom I will haue mercy. Nowe he con-
cludethjthat it is not of him that willeth,or him that runneth, but of
God that hath mercy.If it be thus vnderftanded,that wil or endeuour
are not fufficict,becaufe they arc to weake for fo great a weight, that
which Paule fay th , had not bin aptly fpoken : Therefore away with
thefe futteltics, to fay : It is not of him that willeth , nor of him thac
runnethjtherfore there is fome will,there is fome running.For Paules
meaning is mere (imply, thus : It is not will, it is not running that gee
v$ t\\e way to faluation,herin is only the mercy of God. For he fpea-
keth no otherwife in this place than he doth' to Titus , where he wri-f ic 1.4.
teth , that the goodnelfe and kindenefle of God appeareth not by the
workes of rightcoufne$,which we haue donc,but for his infinite mer-
cy.They thcmfelues that make this argument, that Paule meant thac
there is fome will & fome running, bccaufe he faid, y it is not of him
Cap»5 . Of the knowledge of
that willeth nor of him that runneth, would not giue me Icaue to rea-
fon after the fame fartiion,that we haue done Tome good workes,be-
caufc Paul fayth, that we haue not attayned the goodnefle of God by
the good works that we haue done. If they fee a fault in this argumer,
let them open their eyes, & they (hall percciue that their owne is not
Epi.107 without the like deccite. For that is a fure realon that Auguftmc re-
ad Vi- fteth vpon, If It were therforc fayd that it is not of him that willeth
• nor of htm that runneth, becaule neither the v.'ill nor the running is
fufficient . Then it may be turned on the contrary parte that it is not
ofthe mercy of GodjbecjuTe it alone woiketh not.Sith this (econd 1$
an abfurdity, Auguftine doth rightfully conclude jthat this is fpoken '
to this meaning , that there is no good will of manjvniefle it be pre-
pared of the Lord , not but that we ought botli to will and to runnc,
but becaufe God worketh both in vs. No lefle vnoptly do iome wreft
i.Cor I *^^^ fayinge of Paulc : We are the workers with God , which out of
jl * dout ought to be rcftrayned only to the minillcrs : and that they arc
called workers with him ,not that they bring any thing of thefclucs,
but becaufe God vfeth their feruicc,aftcr that he hath made the mete
and furnirtied with neccflbry giftes.
1 8 They bring foorth Ecclefiafticus, who, as it is not vnknowen,
is a wryter of whofc authority is doutcd . But although we refufc it
not(which yet we may lawfully do)what doth he tcftiHe for free wil?
Eccl.i 5 Hcfaythjthat man lo loor.e as he was created, was left in the hand of
14. his owne counfcU : that cornmaundementes were giuen him , which
if he obfcrued , he fhoulde agayne be preferucd by themrthat before
man was fetlifc and deathjgood and euilLthat whatfoeucr he would,
fliould be giuen him . Be it, that man receiued from his creation po-
wer to obtaine either life or death . What if on the other (ide we an-
fwcrc that he loft it ? Trudy my minde is notjfo fpeakc againft Salo-
mon f, which affirmeth that man at the beginning was create vprighr,
Ecclc,7andhe forged vnto him felfe many inuentions . But becaufe man in
J"* fwaruing,loft as it were by (hip wreckc both himfilfe and all his good
things,it followeth not byandby,that all that is giuen to his firft crea-
tion belongeth to his nature being corrupted and degencrate.Thcr-
fore I anfwere,not to them onely, but alfo to Ecclefiafticus himfelfc
whatfocuer he be.If thou meane to inftruft man,to feckc within him-
felfe power toattayne faIu3tion,thy authority is not of fo great force
with vs, that It may be any preiudicc, be it neuer fo fmall,againft the
vndoutcd word of God.But if thou only ftudy to reftrayne the malice
of the flefh, which in laying the blame of her owne euiUs vpon God,
trieth CO fcekc a vaync defenfe for it fclfc, & therefore thou anfwereft
that
God the Redemcn Lib.2 . 128
that vprightnclTe was giucn vnto men , whereby it may appcare that
himfelfe was caufe of his owne deftrudion , I willingly agree vnto it:
fo that againe chou agree in this with mc, that now by his owne fault
he is fpoyied of thofe ornamcnres,whcrwith God had clothed him at
the beginning: & that fo we confeffc togecher,that now he more nce-
deih a Philicjan than a defender.
19 Yet they haue nothing oftencr in their mouth tha y parable of
Chrift of ihc wayfaringe man>whom theeucs layd abroad halfc dead
in the way. 1 know that it is common almoft with all wryter$,that the - jj^
calamity ofmakinde is reprefentedvndcr the figure of that wayfaring ^^ ' ^
man.Therupon do our aduerfaries gather an argument, y man is not
fo maymed with the robbery of finne and the Dcuili,but y he kcepeth
ftiU rcmayning the leauingcs of his former good things,forafmuch as
it is layd,that he was left halfc aliue.For where is that halfc lifc,vnlcs
fomc portion both of right rea(bn & v/ill remay ned ? Firft if I would
not giuc place to their allegory, 1 befeech you, what would they do ?
For there is no dout that it was deuifed by the fathers beGde the na>
turall fenfe of the Lordcs wordes. Allegories ought to go no further
than they haue the rule of Scripture going before them : (b farre is it
ofjihatthey be by themfelues fufficient to ground any dodrines.And
there want not reafons,whereby I can, if 1 Jiftjouenhrow this deuile,
for the word of God kaueth not to man halfe a life, but teacbeth that
he is vtterly dead,for fomuch as cocerneth bleffcd hfe. And Paul whc Eph. j.
he fpeaketh of our redemption,doth not fay that we were healed, whe 5.
we were halfe dead and halfe aliue, but that we were raifed vp againe
when he were dead. He calleth not vpon them that are halfe aliue to
receiue the light of Chrift, but them that llepe and are buried. And in ^
like maner Ipcaketh the Lord himfelfe,when he fayth,that the hourc Iob.s»
is come when the dead (hall rife againe at his voice. With what face *5'
would they fet this light allufio againft fo many plaine fentences? But
let this allegory haue the force of a ccrtainc teftimony,yet what fliall
they wring out of vs therby?Ma is halfe aliue,therforc he hath fom-
what left fafc.I graunt:he hath a wit capable of vnderftading,althogh
it pearce not to y heauenly and fpirituall wifdomrhe hath true iudgc*
mentofhonefty:he hath fomc feeling of the godhead howbeity he
attaine not the true knowledge of God.But to what purpofe come all
thefe thinges > Truely they bring not to pafle that the fame faying of
Auguftinc be taken fro vs,which is alfo approued by comon confcnt
of the Schooles : that after m:ins fall the freely giuen good thinges,
whereupon faluation hangeth.are taken away from him, and that his
oaturall giftes are corrupted and defiled . Letce therefore diis trueth
Cap. 6. Of the knowledge of
remayne with vs vndouted , which can be (liakcn by no engincs,that
the minde of man is fo eftranged fro the lightcoufnes of God,that it
c6cciucth,coueteih,&enterprirethalwickednes,fihhincs,vncIe3nnes,
and mifchiefeuhat his heart is fo throui^hly foked in poyfon of finnc,
that it can breath out nothinge but corrupt ftinke : But if at any time
they do vttcr any goodnes in ihew, yet ftill the minde remayncth aU
way wrapped in hypocrifie and deceicfull crookednefTcand the heart
- entangled with inward peruerfnes,
Tlie vj. Chapter.
That man being lo(i^mujifeeke for redemption in Chrifi,
STth allmankinde hath perifhedin the perfbn of Adam,that ex-
cellence and nobility of beginninge which we haue fpoken of
would fo htle profit vs , that it would rather turne to our grea-
ter (hame , till God appeare the redeemer in the perfon of his
onely begotten Sonne, which acknowledgeth not men defiled and
corrupted with finne.to be his worke . Therefore fith we arc fallen
from life into death, all that knowledge of God the creator whereof
we haue entreatcdjwcre vnprofitable,vnlej[rc there followed alfo faith
fetting foorth God a father vnto vs in Chrift. Truely this was the na-
turall order that the frame of the world (hould be a Schoole vnto vs
to learne godhncfle , from whcnfe might be made a paflage for vs to
cternalll life and perfeft felicity : but fince our fallinge away,whether
fbcuer we turne our eyes,vpward and downeward, the curfe of God
fiill prefenteth it felfe vnto our fight , which while it poffefTeth and
enwrappeth innocent creatures by our fault,muft needs ouerwhelme
our owne foules with defperation. For although Gods will is that his
fatherly fauour toward vs do ftill many wayes appeare:yet by behol-
ding of the worlde we cannot gather that he is our Father when our
confcience inwardly pricketh V5,and (heweth that there is in finne iuft
caufc of forfakingjwhy God {hould not accompt or reckcn vs for his
children. Befide that there is in vs both flouthfuUnefle and vnthank-
fulnefTe : becaufe both our mindes, as they be blinded,do not fee the
trueth,and aKb as all our fcnfes be pcruerfe, we malicioufly defraude
God of his elory.Therefore we muft come to that fayinge of Paule;
j.Cor.i becaufe in the wifdom of God, the world knew not God by wifdom,
*i. ir pleafcd God by th^ fooliflinefle of preachinge to faue them that
belcuc. The wifdom o£ God he callcth this honorable ftage of hea-
uen and earth , furnifhed with innumerable miracles, bybeholdinge
whereof wc ought wifely to haue kno wen God. But becaufe we fo ill
profited thcrcin,hc calleth vs backc to the fayth of Chrift, which for
that
GodtheRcdemer. Lib.2. up
tliat it fcemcth fooli{h,y vnbeleuers do difdaine. WJierforc although
the preaching of the crofTc do not agree with mas wit,yet ought wc
humbly to embrace it, if wc defire to rcturne to God our creator and
maker,that he may bcginnc agamc to be our father.Truely (mce the
fall of the 6rrt man,no knowledge of God auailcd fo faluation, with-
out the Mediatour . For Chrift fpeaketh not of his ownc age oncly, ioFj.17.
but comprehcndeth all ages,whe he fayth that this is the eternall hfe, }»
to know the father the one true God > & him whom he hath fcnt le-
ius Chrift . And fo much the fowler is their fluggiilinelTe, which take
^pon them to fet open neauen to all prophane and rnHcleuing men,
without his grace whom, the Scripture ech where tcacheth to be the
only gate wherby we entre into faluation. But if any wil rettrayne that
faying of Chrift onl)» to the publifliing of the Gofpel>we haue in rea-
dmcfle wherwith to confute him. For this hath bin a qofDon feotence
in all ages & among all nations, that without reconciliation they that
arc eftranged from God & pronounccd>accurfed and the children of
wrath,can not pleafe God. And here roay be alfo alleiged that which ioi,n, *,
Chrift anfwercd to the woma of Samaria: Ye worfhip what ye know ^i,
not,but we worfhip that which we know: becaufe the/aluation is fro
the Icwes. In which wordes he both condemneth of falfehood all the
reUgions of the Gcntiles,and alfo afligneth a reafon why,for that the
Redeemer was promi(ed vnder the lawc to the onely chofen people.
Whereupon it followcth,that no worfhip euer pleafed God,^ut that
which had refped vnto Chrift. For which caufe alfoPaulc affirmcth - ,
that all the nations of the Gentiles were without God , and voide of , ^
the hope of life . Now wheras lohn tcacheth that life was from the
beginning in Chrift,and that all the world fell from it, wemuft nedes
rcturne to the fame fountayne Chrift. And therfore Chri(l,infomuch
as he is the rcconciler,affirmeth himftUe to be the bfe: And truly the
. inheritance of heauen beloiigcth to oone,but to the dbildre of God.
But it is not meetc that they be accpmpted in the pUcc and degree o f
childreithat arc not grafted into the body of the only begottcn^onnc
And lohn plainely teftificth , that tijcy which bcletie in his name, are
made the children of God. But becaufe it is not dir cdly my purpofe
yet to difcourfe of fayth in Chrift , therefore it Ihallfeil thhUUXkc bc
fufficicnt to haue touched it by the way, r, ,- : • ■ ^> •
X And therefore God neuer (he wed himrelfc mcrcifull to the olde
• peoplc,nor euer did put them in any hope of grace without th^ Me-
diatour. I omitreto fpeake of the facrifices of the lawc, wherein the
faithfull were openly and plainclr taught , that faluation is ^o where
eifc to bc fought^but in the dcniang which was pcrfvi'^rrted by Chrift
Op.^. Of the knowledge of
alone. Only this T fayjthat chc blefled and happy ftate of the church
hath bin alw;iy grounded vpon y perfon of Chrift. For though Gx)d
comprehended all the iflue of Abraham in his couenant, yet doth
JaLj. Paule wifely reafonjthat Chrift is properly that feede in whom allna-
6, tions were to be bleired/orafmuch as we know that not all they were
reckened his feede that were begotten of him according to the flefli,
For(to fpcake nothing of Ifmacl and other) how came it to pafle that
of the two fonnes of Ifaac , that is Efau and lacob , brethren borne
at one birth , while they were yet together m their mothers wombe,
the one was chofcnjthc other refufed ? Yea now came it to pafle that
the elder was reieded and the yongcr only tooke place ? And how al- .
fo came it to pafle,that the greater parte (hould be forfaken?It appea-
reth therefore , that the feedeof Abraham was principally reckened
in one perlolnv^nd that the promifed faluation didncuer ftande furc
-till it came to^hrift , whofc office is to gather together the thinges
that were fi?attcred abroad. Therefore thcfirft adoption of the cho-
fen people did hang vpon the grace of y Mediatour . Which though
it be not in fo plaine wordes exprelTed by Mofes « yet it fufficiently
appeai^eth that it was commonly knowen to all the godly. For before
-that there was any king create'among the people , Hanna the mother
I.Sam, a q( Samuell entreatinge of tile felicity of the godly , euen then fayd
*°* rhus4ri her fortg:God (hallgiireiftrength to his king,and (hal exalt the
horny of His aHomred* In which wordes (lie meaneth that God fhall
bleil'c his church. Wherewith alfo agreeth the oracle that is within a
litieaftcr adioyned : The Prieft whbm Ifhall appoint fhall walke be-
fore rnin^ aftoinrtd. NeitheriJ -it to be douted,but that the will of the
heaufetilyfsthef Avas to'hauc the liucly image of Chrift to be fecne in
Pfil. ». Dg(,jr^! gnd^ h»^ pofterity. Therefore meaning to exhone the godly to
loh.s. ^^° ^^^^'^ of God,he biddcth themtok4fre the Sonne.Wherwith this
J 3. Tayihgof the CSofpell alfo agreerh : He that honoreth not the fonne,
honoretlv nor the father. Therefore although by fallinge away often
tribes ih'e kitisdome decsytd : yet it behoued the cduenant to flandc
Whi^th God^had made in Danid and his fucce (Tours sas alfo he fayd by
^,^^y * the Prophc«:I will not altogethercutof the kingdom, for Dauid my
'fcrUAuntr'^ fakejand for Hierufalems fake, whom I haJue'chofcn : but
there fliall remaine one tribe to rhy fonne. Where the fame thing is
'repetedthe fecOftd and third rime . It is alfo expreffely added. I will
t.Kings afilklithc^eedeof Dauid,but not for cuerwith ina^Iitte fpace of time
>*-?9 'aft«*ll,^lsfayd,For Dauid hit feruanres fake God hath geuen a light in
i.K.pgs Hjerufatemrv torayfevpa fonne andtokepe Hicrufalem ihfauetie.
! ^KmcT*' Now when the ftate grew toward dcfitu^on,icwa« f^jdagayne^ God
would
II. j4.
GodthcRedemcr. Lib.2. 130
"WoUhle not fcatter luda for Dauid his fcruantcs fake , becaufe he had
fpoke f he would giue a light to hi & his Tonnes for cucr.Finally this
is the fummejihat all other being piflld oucr, only Dauid was cho-
fen, vpon whom the good plcafurc of God fhould reft. As in an other
place i t IS fayd : He hath refufcd the tabernacle of Silo , and the ta-
bernacle of lofephjand he hath not chofen the tribe of Ephrainiybut ^*'^'^'
fhe hath chofen the tribe of Iuda,the mount Sion which he hath lo-
ued.He hath chofen his feruant Dauid to feede hcob his people,and
Ifraell his inheritice.To c6clude,it pleafed God fo to faue his church,
that the fafety and preferuaiion thereof iTiouJdhange vpon that one
head,& thcrfore Dauid crieth oui,The Lordy lirength of his people,
the Ihength of the faluationsof hisChrift. Andbyandby he addetha
prayer : Saue thy people & blcfle thine inhcritauncc:meaningthat the
ftate of the church is with vnfeparable knot ioyned to the goucriinjcc
of Chrift. And in y fame meaning in an other place; Lord iaiie v.siLet Pfal. 20,
the king hcare vs in the day^ we Hiall call vpon him Jn which fvords '°*
he plainly teachethjthat the faithfull did vpon none otherconfidencc
tice to the helpe of God,but bccaufc they were hidden vnder the fuc-
cour of the king. Which is gathered by an other Pfalm.Lbrd faue vs:
Bleflcd ishe thatcomethinthcnamcoftheLord.Whcrc it is plaine Pfa.uS
cnough,that the faithfull arc called backe vnto Chnftjihat they may * 5* * ^«
hope that they fhajbe faucd by y hand of God.The fame rcfpe<5i:harh
the other prayer, where all the Church calleth vpon y mercy of God.
Let thy hand be vpon the man of thy right hand , vpon the forine of Pral.So
maiwhom thou haftpreferued(orappointed)io thy felfe.For though '^*
the author of the Pfalme bewaylethy fcattringabrode of the whole
■people ,yet he praieth for their reftitution in the head alone. Where,
when the people was led away into exile,thc land W3fted,& all things
to mans leruing deftroycd,Hiercmy lamenteth the ouerthr(5fk» of the , ,
Church, he doth principally complainc that by deftrudron of the ^.jq. '
kingdom all hope was cut of from the faithfull. Chrift ( fayth he )
the fpint of our mouth is taken in our finnes,to whom we fayd. In chy
(hadowe we fliall liue among the nations. Hereby now it fufhciently
appearerhjthac becaufe God can not be merciful to mankindc with-
out the Mediarour,therefore Chrift was alway fet before the holy fa- .
ihers in time of the law,to whom they might dired their faith.
5 Now, where cofort is promifed in afflidion,fpecially where the
deliueraunce of the Church is defcribed, there the banner of affiance
and hope is auaunced in Chrift alone. God went out to the (auing oi
his people with his Mcffiah, fayth Habacuc. And fo oft as the Pro- Hab.?.
phrtes make mention of the rciloring of the Church, they call backe 1 1.
R ij.
Cap.^. Of the knowledge of
the people to the promifc made lo Dauid, concerning the euerlafttng
continuance of the kingdomc. And no marucll. For otherwifc there
h:id bin no aflurace of the couenanr.For which purpofc fcrueth that
notable a nfw ere of Efay.Forwhenhe faw that the vnbelcuing kingc
Achaircfufed that which he had declared to him ofiherayfingcof
the fiege of Hierufalem and ofprefent rafety,as it were fodainely, he
i%. 7. palfed oucr to Meirias.Behold a virgine fhall conceiuc and bring forth
'4« a Sonne, meaninge indircdly that though the king and his people by
ihcir frowardnefle rcfufcd the promifc offered vnio them, as though
ihey did of purpofe bend thcmfclues to difcrcdite the rrueth of God,
yet the couenant fhouldnot be voide , but that the Redemer (houldc
come at his appointed time . Finally it was the care of all the Pro-
phets,to the cndc they might fhew that God would be mercifull, al-
way to fet out that kingdom ofDauid,wherupon hanged the redcm-
-f* 55* lion andeuerlafting faluation. So Efay fayth : I will make a coucnanc
^* with you the faithfuU mercies of Dauid . Beholde I haue giuen him
for a witncffe vnto nations , that is , becaufc the faythftill when their
ftate is at the worft, coulde not othcrwife haue any hope , but by the
meanes of him bcinge witncffe , that God would be appcafcable to-
^ier.a? ward them. Likewifc Hicrcmy , toraifethem vpbeingeindefpeirc,
S. iayih : Beholde the dayes come , wherein I will raife vp vnto Dauid a
righteous branchcjand then fliall luda be fauedjand Ifraell ftiall dwell
=Tc. 34. ^" Safety . And Ezechiell fiycth , 1 raife vp one fheepcherd ouer my
ij. ffieepe , cuen Dauid my fcruant . I the Lord will be a God to them>
and my feruaunt Dauid for a iheepeherd. And I will make a couenani
of peace with them. Aifo in an other place,3fter he had entreated of
E7c.57.the incredible rcnuingc , hefayeth : my feruaunt Dauid fhalbe their
*5* King,and there fhalbe cnefheepeherd oucr all, and I will make an c-
uerlaftii^ couenant of peace with them. I gather here and there a
fc we pla Jls out of many, becau(e I onely meane to haue the readers
putte in mindc, tha: the hope of all the godly hath alway bin repofed
no wi^ere clfe but in Chrift . And ail the other Prophe<es alfo fpcakc
orc.1.1 2 agreably hereunto , as it is fayd in Ofee . The children of luda and
the children of 1 fraell fhalbe gathered together , and fhall appoynt
to themfclues one head. Which he afterward more plaincly expoun-
**^*^ deih. The children of Ifraellihallreiurne, & lliall feeke for the Lord
their God and Dauid their king. And Michee fpeakiiig of the returnc
of t!ic people expreffely fayth, The king fhall go before them, & the
Amos 9 Lord in their head . So Amos meaning to prnyfc the rcnuing of rhc
II, people, 'ayth : 1 will in that day raife vp the tabernacle of Dauid that
is fallen downe,and I wil hedge vp the gappes,and raife vp the places
ouerthi^-
GodthcRedemcr. Lib.2. 131
Oucrthrowcn,euen becaufc that was the only Itandarci of faluarioiijio
hauc the royall glory to rife vp againe on hie in the ftockc of Dauid,
which is fulfilled in Chrift.Therfore Zacharie,as his age was nercr to ^
the appearing of Chrift/o doth he more plainly eric out:be glid thou *
(daughter of Sion,reioife thou daughter of Hierufalem. Beholde thy
king commcth, righteous and faucd . Which agrceih with the place
of the Pfalmc before alleaged . The lorde the ftrength of the falua-
tions of his anointed, Lord faue vs. Where faluation is dcriued from
the head to the whole body. ^
4 It was Gods will to haue the lewes fo inftrufted with the(c pro-
phccie<,that to fcke for their deliuerance,they fliould bend their eyes
diredly to Chrift. And though they had Ihamfully fwarued,yet could
not the remebrancc of the gcnerall principle be abolilhed,that God
by the hand of Chrift^ishe had promifed to DauidjWould be the de-
liuerer of his church,and fo the couenant iliould be of his owne free
grauncjwherby God had adopted his chofen. Hereby it came to paife,
that this fonge founded imhe mouth of the children when Chrift a
lirle before his death entred into Hicrufale,Hofianna to the fonnc of j^^^j , j^
Dauid . For it appeareth that it was commonly knowen and fpoken ^.
of, & according to common vfe that they fong,that the only pledge
of Gods mercy rcmayned vnto them, in the coming of the Redemer.
For this caufe Chrift himfelfe , to make his difciplcs plainly and per- Ioh.x4.
fedly bcleuc in God, biddeth the to beleuc on himfelfe, Beleue ye in »•
God, (faith he) then beleue alfo in me.Foi though(to fpeakc propcr-
ly)fauh chmeth vp from Chrift to the father,yct he meaneth that the
fame faith,albeit it reft vpon God.doth by lirle and litle vanifti away,
vnlcfle he become a mcane to hold it in aflfured ftedfaftnefle. Orher-
wife the maiefty of God is to hie for mortall men, which creepe vp-
pon the grounde bke wormes,to anaine vnto it. Wherefore 1 allowe
that common faying,that God is the obied of faith,but in fueh forte
that it needeth corredion.Bccaure Chrift is not in vaine called the in- ColotU
uifiblc Image of God, but by this title we are put in minde,that if we » 5»
finde not God in Chrift , faluation can not be knowen vnto vs . For
although amonge the lewes, the Scribes and Pharifees had darkened
with falfe inucntions, that which the Prophctes had fpoken concer-
ning the Redccmer:yet Chrift tooke it for a thing confefled as recei-
ued by common c6fent,that there was none other remedy, defpered
cafe,and no other mcane of deliucringc the church, but by giuing the
Mediatour . In dcede that was not commonly knowen amonge the
people as it ought to hauc bin , which Panic teacheth , that Chrift i$
fhc endc of the lawc . Budiowe true and afliired it is , doth playncly ^°' ^^^
R iij.
Cap. 7. Of the knowledge of
appeare by the law and the Prophctcs. I Ipeake not yet of fayth , be-
cauie there flialbe eU'cwhcre a more conuenient place for it.Only let
the readers hold this as faft ftabhfhed , that the firft degree of godli-
ncflc be, to acknowledge God to be a Father vnto vs, to defend, go-
ucrne and cherifh vSjtill he gather vs together into the euerlafting in-
heritance of his kingdom;and that hereby it plainly appeareth which
we fayd eucn now,that the knowledge of God which bringeth falua-
cion,{hndeth not withcutChrift,and that therefore from the bcgin-
) nmg he hath bin fet forth vnto all the elcd,rhat they iliould looke v-
pon hnT),and that m him fliould reft all their affiance. Accordmjjc to
this meaning wntcth Ireneus,thatthe Father which is vnmeafurable,
is m his Sonne meafured.becaufe he hath applied himfelfe to y mea-
furc of our capacity , leaft he fhould drowne our mindcs with the vn-
mtalurablncs of his glory .Which thing the phrentike men not con-
<idering,do wreft a profitable fentence to a wicked fantafy>r;S though
there were m Clirift but a portion of the godhead deriued from the
whole perfedion : whereas it meaneth nothing elfe, but that God is
i.Ioh.3. comprehended m Chrift alone. That fayinge of lohn hath alway bin
31. true:He y hath not the Sonne,ncither hath he the father. For though
in old time many did boft that they worshipped the foueraifjne God,
the maker o^ hcauen and earth: yet becaufe they had no Mediatour,
It was impoffible that they fiiould trucly taft of the mercy of Godj&
(b be pcrfuadcd <i he was their father. Therefore becaufe they kr.cvr
not y head thatisChrift, the knowledge of God was but value anio»
thcm:vvhcrcby alfo it came to pafle , that at length faUing into groffe
& filthy (lipcfftitionSjthey bewrayed rhcir owne ignorance. As ac tliis
day the Turkcs.ahhough they report with full mouth,that the crea-
tor of beauen and earth is their God , yet do they thruft anidolc in
place of the true God while they fwaruc from Chrift.
The VI j. Chapter.
thM tht Uvv was gmtn^n$tte hold fitU the people in itf
but t9 Mmrish the hope effaluatign in Chrtfi
Vnnli hts commtng.
Y this continuall proccfle that we hauc rchearred , may be ga-
theredjthat the law was added about fourc hundred yeres after
the death of Abraham,not for this cntct to lead away the cho«
(en people from Chrift ; but rather to keepe thcyr n^ndfs in
expedition vntill his comminge, to kindle a defirc of him, &<o con-
hrme them in looking for him , tliarthcy fhould not waxe faint with
longutiaoce.1 mcane by this word Law» noc only the ten commaun-
dememes
GodthcRcdemcr. Lib.2. 152
dcmcntcs, which prcfcnbea rule how to hue godlily'and rightcoufly,
but alfo the forme of religion dehucred by the hand of Moics . For
Mofcs was not made a iawgiuer to aboh(h the blellingc promifed lo
the kinred of Abraham : but rather we fee how cuery where he put-
tcth the lewcs in remembrance of that free couenaunt ma Je with
their fathers whofc hcires they were , as if he had bin Tent to renewc
the fame . That was moft plamely fet foorth by the ceremonies. For
what were more vaine and fonde, than for men to offer vp lothfome
ftinkc of the fat of cattell,to reconcile themfelucs to God ihecby ? lo
flee to the fprinkling of water or bloud to wa(h away their filthines?
Finally, all the feruice of God apointcdin the law ( if it be coniidered
by it felfe, and do not coniaine fhadows and figures,which the truetb
(hould anfwere vnto)fhalbe but a very mockery. Whetfore not with-
out a caufc both in Stephens fermo, & in the Epiftle to the Hcbrues Aft. j.
is that place fo diligently weyed, where God commaudeth Mofcs to 44.
make all things pertaining to the tabernacle,accordingto the parerne Hcb.S.j
that had bin fliewed him in the mount. For if there had notbmforr.e ^'^"•^5»
fpirituall tiling appointed that they Ihould tend vnto.y lewes /hould ^°'
no lefle haue fondly fpent their labour in them,than the Gemtles did
in their trifles. Prophanemen that neuer earntftly applied theftu-
dy of godhneffe,cannot without lothfome tedioufnefle abide to here
fo many fundry fafhions of vfages : andthey not onely marueil why
God wearied his people with fuch a heape of ceremonies , but alTo
they defpife and fcornc them as childrens playes . And the cayfe is,
for that they confider not the end, fio which if the figures of the law
be feueredjthey muft needes be condemned of vanity . But that fame
figure (heweth, that God did not therefore coramaund facriliccs, be-
caufc he would occupie them that worrtiipped him with earthly ex-
crcifcs,but rather to raife vp their minds hier. Which may alfo plain-*
ly appcare by his naturcrfor as he is fpirituall, fo he is dchted with no
other worlhippinge but fpirituall . This do the fayingesjpfLfhe Pro-
phetcs tefl:ifie, wherein they rebuke the Icwcs offluggifhnesufor that
they thought that any facrifices were of any value with God. Is that
becaufe their purpofe is to derogate any thing from the law? No.buc
according as they were true cxpofitours of the law, fo they would by
this meane haue mens eyes direded to the marke fro which the com-
mon people ftrayed.Now by the grace offered to the Icwcsjf is cer-
tainly gathered , that the law was not void of Chrift . For Mofcs did Eiro.io.
fet forth vnto them this end of the adoption , that they flioMidc be- 6,
come a prieftly kingdom to God. Which they coulde nocobtame vn-,'
Ics there were had foe the meane therof a greater aad incyi^ief ccllenC;
R iiij.
Cap. 7. Of the knowledge of
rtconciliation , than by the bloud of bcaftes. For what is IcfTe hkcly
than Adams children , which by inhcritably defcending infedion arc
all borne the bonddaucs of iinne,to be aduaunced to royal dignity ,&
ib to bfcome partakers of the glory of God , vnlefTc chatfo cxcellenc
a benefic fhoulde come vnto them from clfe where than from thcm-
felucs? Alfo how could y right of priefthoode rcmaine in force amog
ihcm, who by HIthinefle offinnes were abhominable to God, vnlcs
they ha<l bin confccratc in a holy head ? Wherefore Peter doth very
aptly turne that faying of MoifeSjwhere he teacheth,that the fiilnes
of grace, the taft wherof thclewes had taken vndcr thelaWjWas giuen
.Pet.a. in Chrift.Yea arc(fayth he)a chofen kinred,a kingly priefthoode.For '^
>. to this end tendeth that turning of the wordcs, to (hewe that they, to
whom Chnft appeared by the Gofpelihaueobtaincd more than their
fatherSjbecaurc they are ail endued both vv prieftly and kingly honor,
that truftmg vpon their mediatour, they may freely be bold to come
forth into the (ight of God.
2 And here by ihc way it is to be noted, that the kingdom which
at length was ereded in the houfc of D3uid,i$ part of the law,& con-
tained vnder the mmiftery of Mofes . Whereupon foUowcth, that as
wel in all the kinred of the Leuites as in the pofterity of Dauid Chrift
was fet before the eyes of y olde people as in a double looking glaffe.
For,as l fayd euen now, they could not oiherwife be before God ei-
ther kings or pricftcs,which were both the bondflaucs oflinneand of
death,& defiled by their ownc corruption. Herby appeareth that that
Jala.i, ^3y'"g<^^ Paul IS moft true, that the fcwes wereholdenas vnder the
^ kepinc; of a Schoolema'.fterjtill the fcde came for whofe fake the pro-
mifc was giuen . For , becaufe Chritt was not yet familiarly knowen,
they were like vnto children, whofe weakenefle could not yet bearc a
full knowledge of heauenly thingcSjbut howe they were by ceremo-
nies as It were led by the hand to Chrift,i$ before Ipoken, & may be
better vndcrtlanded by many tcflimonics of the Prophetes . For al-
though U Was commaunded them to come daily with ne we facrifices
ra. 5 J. to appcafe'Cod; yet Efay promifcth that all theit finnes (halbe clean-
>ani.i>. fed with one onely facrificc. Wherewith Daniell agreably fayeth:Thc
prieftes appointed of the tribe of Leui , did enter into the Sanduary:
but of the only pricft it was once fayd, that by an oth he was chofqn
fa.i 1 o of God to be a prieft for euer,according to the order of Melchifcdec.
At that time the anointing with oile was vifible : but Daniel by his
vifion prcnouncethy there fhalbe an other manner of anointing. And
becaufe I will not tary vpon many examples,the author of the Epiftle
to the Hebi?ucs euen from the 4. chapter to the 1 1. doth largely and
'L— plainly
GodtheRedemcr. Lib.2, 135
plaincly enough ihcwc , that the ceremonies arc nothing worth and
vainc till we come ro Chrill. As concenimgthe cenne commaundc-
fnctes:thatlcflbn of Paule is hkewife to be kept in mindc, that Chrift j^
is the cnde of the law vnto faluationjto eueiy one that bcleueth: And 4.
an other lelTon , that Chnft is the Spniie that quickcncth the letter i.Ccr.
which of irlelfe fljyeth.For in the firli of ihefe two,he meaneth that *•
rightcoufneflc is vainely taught by commaundemcntes, vntill Chrift
do gcuc it both by free imputation and by the fJDirite of regeneration.
Wherfore he worthily calleth Chnft the fulfilling or cndc of the law.
Bycaufe it fhouide nothing profit vs to knowe what God requireth o(
vs, vnkfle he did fuccour vs fainting and opprefled vndcr the yoke &
vntolerable burden . in an other place he teachcih that the lawcwas Cal.j*
made tor tranl'grcflions , that is to bring men to humilitie being pro- '^*
ued gilty of their ownc damnation. And, bycaufe this is the true and
onely preparation to feke Chrift , what fo cuer be tcacheth in diuerfe
wordcs , do all very well agree together . But bycaufe he then was in
contention with peruerfe teachers , which fained that we do deferuc
rightcoufncfle by the workes of the lawejto confute their errour, he
was compelled fometime to Ipeake precifcly of die bare lawc, which
yei otherwife is clothed with the coucnant of free adoption.
J But now it is good to know , how being taught by the morall
lawe , we arc made more inexcufabls , that our owne giitynelle may
moue v$ tocrauepardon.ifit be true that we be taught pcrfedion of
risjhteoufnefTe mthe lawe : then this alfo followeth,that the abfolute
kepmg thereof is pcrfed rightcoufneffe before God)that is,whereby
a man may be demed and accompted righteous before the heauenly
throne of judgement. Wherefore Mofes,when he had pubhOied the Deu.j(
lawc, doubted not to protcft before heaucn and earth, that he had fet 1 5.
before IfracU life and death, good and euili. And we may no: dcnie,
but that the rewarde of eternall faluation belongeth to the vpnghc
obedience of the lawe,as the Lord hath promifed it. Againe.yet it is
good to examine, whether we performc that obedience, vpon defcrt
whereof we may conceiue a rrufi of that rewarde. For to what Imall
purpofeis it , to fee the rewarde of eternall hfe fet in kepingof the
lawc , vnlefle we further knowe whether we may by that way attainc
to eternall life ? But herein the weakenelTe of the lawe doth Ihcwe it
Telfe. For bycaufe that kepingof the lawe is founde in none of vs all,
we are excluded from the promifcs of life,and do fall into curfe only.
I do not nowc tell what doth come to pafle , but what needes mi>ft lo
come to paffe . For where as the dodrine of the lawe is farrc aboue
the power of man ^ he may in decdc a farrc of) looks at the promifcs.
Cap. 7. Or the knowledge of
but ycc not gather any fruite of them . Therefore this one thing re-
majmeth^ that by the goodncflc of them he may the better weye his
owne miferie, while he confidereth , that all hope of faluation being
cut of, death doth certainely haog ouer him . On the other fide do
prefTe vs terrible penall lawes , which do holde entangled and faft
boundc notonely afeweof vSjbutcuery one without cxception:they
prcflc vs , I fay , and do purfue vs , with vnappeafablc rigour , fo that
Vfc may fe moft prefent death in the lawe.
4 Therforc if we loke only vpon the lawe, we can do nothing but
be difcouragcd , be confounded , and defpeire , forafmuch as by it wc
are all damned and curfcd, & kept farre of from the bleflfedneflc that -
he oft'reth to them that worfliip him. \Vdt thou fay then ^ Doth the
Lord fo mocke vs ? For how fmally doth it differ from mocking , to
ihewe forth a hope of felicirie, to allure and cxhortc men vnto it, to
proteft that it is layed open for vsjwhen in the meane feafon the en-
tne vnto Jt is forclofed and impoflible to be come to ? I aunfwere : al-
though the promifes of the lawe,in fo much as they are conditional,
do hang vpon the perfed obedience of the lawe, which can no where
be founde.yet are they not geuen m vaine.For when we haue learned
that they (halbe voide and of no eflfed vnto vs , vnleffe God embrace
vs with his free goodnefle without regarde of our woikes,and vnleifc
we do embrace by faith the fame goodnefle geuen vs by the Gofpell,
then want they not their effrdualneffe , yea with their condition an-
nexed. For then he doth fo freely geue all thinges vnto vs,that he ad-
deth this alfo to the heape of his bountifulncfle , that not refufing out
halfc full obedience, and remitting fo much as it wanieth of full per-
formance , he fo maketh vs to enioy the frute of the promifes of the
lawe I as if we our felues had fulfilled the condition . But we will at
this prefent procedc no further in this matter,bycaufe it fhalbe more
largely to be entreated of, when wc fliall fpeake of the lulbfication
of faith.
5 Wheras we (aid that it is impoflible to kepe the lawe, that is in
fewc wordes to be both expounded and proued.For it is wont among
the people commonly to be accompted an opinion of great abfurdi-
ticjfo farre that Hierome doubted not to pronounce it accurfed:whac
Hierome thought,! do nothing ftay vpon: as for vs,l€t vs fearch what
is truth. I will not here make long circumftanccs of diuerfe fortes of
polVibilities. I call that impoflible, which both neucr hath ben, and
alfo is hindered by the ordinance and decree of God , that it neucr
hcrafter may be. If wc recorde from the fartheft time of memoric , I
(ay that there hath none of the holy men,thac being clothed with th^
bodio
GodthcRedemer. Lib.2. 154
bodie of death, hath euer attained to that full perfcdion of loue , to
loue God with all his heart, with all his minde,with all his foulc,with
all his power : Againe, that there hath bene none that hath not bene
troubled with concupifcence.Who can fay Nay ? I fee in dcede what
maner holy men foolilTi fuperftition doth imagine vnto vs,cucn fuch
whofc purenefle the heaucnly Angels do fcarcely countcruaile : but
againft both the Scripture and profe of experience . I fay alfo , that
there ihall none hcrafter be, that Ihali come to the marke of true per-
fedion , vnlefle he be loolcd from the burden of his bodic . For this
point there are open teftimonies of Scripture, Salomon faid, there is * ^*J»
not a righteous man vpon the earth that finneth not. And Dauid faid: pjJ*J* ^
euery liuing man flial not be luftified in thy fight. lob in many places ^ j7
affirmeih the fame. But Paule mott plainly of alhthat the flefh lufteth Gala, j
againft the fpirite , and the fpiritc againft the flelh . And by no other »o«
rcafon he proueth that all ih.^t are vnder the lawe , arc fubied to the
curfe. But bycaufe it is written , that curfcd are all they that do not -^
abide in all the commaundementcs thcrof : meaning, or rather taking 2^. *
itasathingconfelfed, that no man can abide in ihcm.And what foe-
uer is forcfpokc by the Scriptures,thai muft be holden for perpctuall,
yea andneccflarie. With fuch futtciric did the Pelagians trouble Au-
guftine, faying that there is wrong done to God , to fay that he doth
coTimaund more than the faithful are able by his grace to performe.
Augultine, to auoide their cauiUaiion confelTcdjthat the Lord might Lib. dc
indecdc,if he woulde , aduaunccamortall man tothepurenclfeof "'tu. 3{
Angels : but that he neither hath done fo at nny time, nor will do, by- Si^^tia.
caufc he hath othcrwi(c affirmed in the Scriprures. And that do f al-
fo notdenic. But I adde further , that it is inconucnicnt to difpute of
his power againft his trdth,and that therfore this fcntcnce is not fub-
ied tocauillations if a man fhoulde fay, that that thine; is impoilible
to be, wherof the Scriptures do pronounce that it fhall not be. But i{
they difpute of the worde: when the Difciples afkcd the Lorde, who ^jat,^
may be faued, he aunfwered : with men in deedc it is impofliblc , but 25.
with God all thingcs are poflible. Alfo Auguftinc with a moft ftrong Lib.de
rcafon ftiffely defendeth , that in this flcfli we ncuer yclde to God the ^P'f'^ »
due loue that we owe him. Loue (faith he) fo followcth knowledge, ^"*''
that no man can perfedly loue God,but he that hath firft fully knowe
his goodnefTe.Wcjwhile we wander in this worldc,fee by a glaffe and
in a darke fpeechut followcth therfore,that our loue is vnperfed. Let
this therefore remaine out of controuerfie , that in this flcfliic is. im-
poffiblc to fulfill the lawe , if we behold the weakenclTe of our ownc „ •
nacurc,as it (hall yec alfo in an other place be proued by Paule. ..
Cap.7. Ut the knowledge ot
6 But that the whole matter may be more plainly fct forth : let v«
io a compendious order gather vp together the ofHce and vfe of the
lawc which they call Moral.Now,as farre as I vnderftand,it is contci-
ncd in the fe three partes. The firft is, that while itfhcweth tocuery
man the rightcourneirc of God,that iSjthe rightcoulhcflc which only
is acceptable to God, it admonifli, certifie, prouc gilty * yea and con-
<iemne cuery man of his owne vnrighteoumefle. For fo is it nedcfull
that man blinded and dronke with loue of himftlfe , be driuen both
to the knowledge and the confeffion of his owne weakcnelTe and vn- •
cleannelTc : for afmuch as if his vanitic be not euidcntly conuinced,he
fwelleth with madde afhance of his owne ftrength, and can neuer be-
brought tothinkeof the fclcdcrnclTe therof, fo long as he mcafureth
it by the proportion of his owne will. But fo fone as he beginneth to
compare his ftrength to the hardnelTe ofthelawe, there hefindeth
matter to abate his courage. For how fo cucr he before conceiued a
great opinion of it , yet byandby he fcelcth it to pante vndcr fo great
a burden,and then to (hake and foltcr, at lafte cocn to fall downe and
faint. So being taught by the fcholing of the Liwc,he putteth of that
arrogancic whcrwith before he was blinded. Likewifc he is to be hea-
led of an other difeafe of pride > wherof we haue faid that he is ficke.
So long as he is fuftred to ihnd to his owne iudgemcnt , he deuifeth
Hypocrifie inftcde of righteoufneffc, whcrwith being contented , he
nfetii vp in courage , by 1 woie not , what forged righteoufneflcs , a-
gainft the grace of God. Butfo fone as h- is compelled to trie his life
by the balaunce of the lawe,the leauing the prcfumptionof the coun-
terfait righreoufnefle, he feeth himfelfe to be an infinite fpace diftant
from holynelfe : Againe^that he floweth full of infinite vices , wherof
before he feemed cleane. For the euils of lufte are hidden in fo dcepc
and crooked priuic corners , that they ca.Gly decciue the fight of ma.
And not without caufc the Apoftle faith , that he knewe not luftcjex-
cept the lawe had faid : Thou fliall not lufte : bycaufe except it be by
the law difclofed out of her lurking holes,it deftroieth miferablc man
fo fecretly,that he fceleih not the deadely darte thereof.
7 So the lawe is like a certaine looking glafl'e wherein we be-
holde,firft our weakenefle,and by that our wickednc{re,and lafte of all
by them both our accurfednellc, euen as a glaflc rcprelenteth vnto vs
the fpottcs of our face.For when power faileth man to follow rightc-
Gufnefle, then mufte he ncedes fticke {a^c in the mire of (innes. And
after finnc byandby followeth curfc. And of howe much the greater
tranfgrcflion the lawe holdeth vs giltie and conuid, with fo much the
more greuousiudgcment it condetnnctU vj.FQrthis purpofc maketh
thf
GodtheRcdcmcr. Lib.2. 135
the laying ot the Apoillc, that by the laweis the knowledge of finnc. Rom. |i
For there he fpcakcih onely of the firft office of the lawe,thc proofc **•
wherof is in (inners not yet regenerate. And like to this are chcfe two
fayingcs, that the lawe entred that (inne might abound, and thcrfore Rota. 5.
that it is the miniftration of death thatworkcth wrath and flaycih. ^^'
For without doubt fb much more growerhiniquicie, with how much ' **'*
more vnderftanding of (inne the confcicncc is ftrikcn , bycauie vnto Rom. 4.
breach of lawe is added obihnacie againft the maker of the lawe. It 1 5.
foliovveth therfore that the lawe armeth the wrath of God to the dc-
ftrudion of the finner , bycaufeofii felfc it can do nothing but ac-
cufcjCondemnc and delb-oic. And as Auguftine writcth,if the fpirite ^
of grace be abfent, the lawe is prcfent with vs > onely to this ende, to rc.&gra
accufe vs and kill vs. And yet when this is faidjneither is the lawe ^iC- tia. vi-
honored thereby , nor any thing taken from the excellencie thereof. ^^ ^™-
Truely if our will were wholy framed and difpofed to the obedience "'"°**
of the lawe,then plainely the onely knowledge of it were fufficient to deUc.
faluation. But for afmuch as our ticfhly and corrupt nature fighteth, & vita
as an enemic with the fpiritualUawe of God, and is nothing amended bcaca.
with the difcipline thercof,this followeth that the lawe which was gc- *^*P**»
uen for faluaiio, (if it hadde foundc fittc hearers) tourneth to the oc-
calion of (inne and death. For fith we are all proucd tranfgrcflbrs of
it, the more plainely that it opcneththc righteoufnelTeofGod, (0
much the more on the other fide it difclofeth our iniquitic t the more
furdy that it confirmeth the rewarde of life and faluation laidc vp for
righteoufncffc,fo much the more affured it makethdie deftru^ion
of the wicked . So farre is it of therefore that thefc fayingcs fhouldc
be tothedithonourofthelawe, that they much auaile to the more
glorious commendations of Gods bountie . For truely it hereby ap»
pearcth that we are hindered by our owne wickednefle , and perucrf-
neffejthat we enioy not the bleflcdnclTe of life fet openly abroade for
vs by the lawe. Whereby the grace of God rhathelpeth vs without
the fuccour of the lawe , is tnade fo much the fwctcr , and the mcrcic
more loutly thacgeucth it vnto v$,wherby we learne that he is ncucc
wearied with often doing vs good and heaping new giftes vpon vs.
8 And whcras the iniquitie and condemnation of vs all is fealed
by the teflimonie of the lawe , it is not done for this purpofe (if at
leafte we well profit in it)to make vs fail downe with dcfpeirCjor with
difcouraged mindes to tumble downc hedlong. In dcedc the repro"
bate arc amafed after that manner, but that is by reafon of their ob-
ftinacicjbut with the children of God there behoueth to be an otheri^j,^ -
cnde of inftruiftio. I graunr,the Apoftle telhiicch that we arc all con-t^.
Cap.7. Of the knowledge of
demned by itrdgemcnc of the lawe , that eucry mouth may be Hop-
ped, and that all the woride may become boundc vnto God : but yet
Rom.Ti *^^ ^^"^^ Apoftlc in an other place teacheth , that God hath conclu-
3 a. ded all vnder vnbeliefe,not to deftroy all, or to fufter all to perifh, but
that he might haue mercy of all , that leauing the foolifh opmion o£
their owncftrength, they might vndcrftand, that they ftand and arc
vpholden by the onely hande of God : that they being naked and
cmpt!e,may flee to his rnercie,thatthey may refte them teiues wholly
vponit,hide themfelues wholly in it, take holdcof it alone in (leede
of rigbteoufnefle and merites , which islaideopen in Chrilt tor all
men who foeucr they be that with true faith do dclirc and lookc foe
it. For God in the comnuiundementesof the lawe appcareth but a
rewarder of pci ted righteoufhcfle , wherof we all arc deftitute , and
on the other fide a rigorous iudge of euill doinges.. But in Chrift his
face fhmeth full of grace and lenity , euen towarde the wretched and
vnworthy finners.
9 Of profiting, to crauc the grace of his helpc, Auguftinc fpea-
Ipiftol. keth oft,as when he wrircth to Hilarie, The lawe commaundeth that
aoo. cndeuoring to do the thinges commaunded, and being wearied with
-our wcakenetie vnder tliclawc , we Ihoulde learne to af ke the helpc
Bpiftol. of grace. Aj;aine to A fclius . The profit of the lawe i$ to conuince
aoo. man of his owne weakeneffe,and compell him to craue the Phyfickc
Bpittol. of grace that is in Chnft. Againe to Innocent of Rome , The lawe
5^« commaundeth, and grace mmiftrcthftrength to do. AgainctoVa-
Lib. delentine: God commaundeth ihofe thmgcs that we can not do, that
corre,& yf^ may learne to knowc what to af ke of him. Againe i The lawe was
1 "pfal g*^"**^ ^^ accufe you, that being accufed you fhould feare,that fearing
70. you Ihoulde crauc pardon,and not prcfome of your owne ftrengthes.
1 Pf J Againe:The lawe was geuen for this purpo(e,ofgrcat to make little,
,,3, * to fhewc that thou haft no ftrength of thine owne to righteourneire>
that thou as poore, vnworthy and needy » Ihouldcft flee vnto grace,
- After, he tourncth his fpeech ro God and faith : Do To Lorde , do fo
merciful Lordc,commaunde that which can not be fulfiUed:yea,com-
maimdethat which can not but by thy grace be fulfilled, that when
men can not fulfill it by their owne ftrength , eucry mouth may be
flopped, and no m^n may thmkc him felfe great.Letall be little ones,
and let all the woride be cihy before thee.But I am not wife to heapc
vp fo many teftimonics,fith thnt holy man hath writte a bookc pro-
prely of that matter, which he hath intituled. Of the Spiritc and Let-
ter. The fcconde profiting he doth not fo liuely defcribe , either by-
ttufchcknewe that it did hang vpon the former, orbycaufe he did
not
GodtheRcdemen Lib.2. 13^'
not Co well vnderftand ic , or bycaufc he wanted wordcs where with
diftindly & plainly to exprefle his meaning of it, which yet he right-
Jy conceyucd : but this Hrft office of the lawc is not idle euen in the
reprobate alfo. For though they go not thus farre forwardc with the
children of God,that after the throwing downe of their flcfh they be
renued and florifh againe in the inward man, but amafed with the firft
terrour do lie ftiU in defperation : yet it fcrueth to (hev/c forth the
cquitie of Gods iudgcment , that their confciences be tofTcd with
fuch wayes. For they eucr willingly defire to make fhific againft the
iudgcment of God. Nowe while the fame is not yet opencd,they yet
fo aftonifhed with the teftimonie of the lawc and their confcience do
bewraic in them felues what they haue deferued.
10 The fecond office of the iawe,is that they which arc touched
-vrith no care of that which is iuft and right , vnlefle they be compel-
led, when they heare the terrible pcnall ordinaimces therein, may be
reftrayned at leaft with feare of punifhment . But they arc rcftrained,
not becaufe their inwarde minde is moued or aflpeded withall,but by;-
caufe being as it were bridelcd,ihey withholde their handc from out*
warde worke, and do keepe in their peruerfenefle within them,which
^therwifc they woulde haue outragioufly poured our. Thereby they
become truely nether the bettcr,nor the more righteous before God.
"For although being letted either by feare or by {hamc , they dare not
put that in pradife which they haue conceiued in their mmdc, nor
openly blowabrode the rages of their luft:yet haue they not a heartc
framed to the feare & obediecc of God, yea the more that they holdc
backe them felues , (b much the ftronglicr within they are kindcled,
-they burnc,they boile, ready to do any thing, and to breake forth any
whether, if this terrour of the lawc did not ftay them . And not that
onely, but alfo they moft fpitefully hate the lawc, and do deteft God
the lawcmaker,fo that if they coulde, they would very faine take him
away , whome they can not abide , neither when he commaundeth
rightfull thinges , nor when he reuengeth him vpon the dcfpifers of
his maieftie.In (bme in dcede more darkly,and in fome more plaincly»
but in all generally that are not regcnerat,is this fecling,(h3t they arc
drawen to the following of the lawe not by willing rubrai(Iion,but re*
lifting and againft tJieir willes,only by violence of feare.But this con-
ftrained and enforced righteoufnefteis ncceflaric for the publike com-
mon ftate of men,the quiet wherof is herin prouided for.while ordrc
is taken that all rhin<7cs be not cofonnded with vprorcwhich woulde
come topalTejifallthinors werelnwcfull for all men.Yeaitisnotvn-
proHtablc for the childrc of God to be excrciled with this Scholing,
\:>ap.7. vJr the knowledge ot
fo long as they before their calling being yet delticutc of the fpiritc
of fandification, are ftill wanton with the folly of the flcfh.For when
they are drawcn backe , though it be but fiom omwardc hcentiouf^
ncflc, by the terrour of Gods vengeance , although for that they arc
not yet tamed in minde, they gotbr theprefent time but a little for*
wardcjvetthey partly grow in vre to beare the yoke of Chnft, fo that
when they are calltd , they be not altogether rude and raw to d»fci-
i.Tira. pline, as to a tliinc; vnknowen. Tlxis office the A poftle feemeth pro-
'^ prcly to haue touched , when he faicth that the bwe was not fct for
the righteous man , but for the vnrighteous and difobedient , wicked
and (inners,euill doers and prophanc mcn,flaiers of their paretes, and
murthcrcrs , fornicators , Sodomites , robbers of children , lyers an^f
periured mcn,and what fbeuer ells is againft founde dodrine. For he
iaieth , that it is a ftay to the wilde outraging luftes of the Acfh , that
ells woulde ftray abroadc without meafure. '
1 1 But ro both may that be applyed which he faith in an other
5jJ .^ place, that the l.iwe was to the lewes a Schoolemairter to Chrirt , for
»4. ' there are two fortes of men, whom with her fchooling ("he leadeth by
the hande to Chrift. The one forte, of whome we firft fpakcbycaufe
they are to full of affiance of their owne ttrcngth or righteoufnelTe,
Jire not meete to receiue the grace of Chrift, vnlefle they be fiift em-
ptied,thercfore the lawe bringeth them downe co humilitie by knoW-
t ledge of the felues, that fo they may be prepared to defire that which
before they thought they wanted nor. The other foiic ncede a bridle
to be holden backe , leaf! they Co geue loofe the rcinesco the wan*-
tonneffeofthcirflcfh, that they fall of altogether from all ftudicof
rit^hteonfneire. For where the fpirite of God doth not yet gouerne,
there fometime luftes do fo boile , that it is in great peril! leaftthey
throw downe the foulc that is fubied to them into the forgetfulneffc
and defpih'nge of God: and fo woulde it come to pafle if God did not
with thi? remedy prouide for it.Therfore thofe whom he hath apoin-
ted ro rhc inheritauncc of his kingdome , if he do not byandby rege-
nerate them, he kcepeth them by the workes of the lawe vnder feare,
vntill the time of his vifitation , not that chaftc and pure feare fuch as
ought to be in children , but yet a proBtable fcarc for this that they
inav according to their capacitie be taught by introduftion to true
l^odlinefle. Of this we haue fo many proueSjthat it needeth no exam-
ple. For who focuer haue any time continued in not knowing of God,
will cofeiTc that this happened vnto them , that they were boldcn by
the bridle of the law in fomc feare & obediece of God,vntil the time
that being regenerate by his fpirit.chcy begannc hartcly to loue him.
IX The
CjodthcKedemcr. i-ib.2. 137
XI The third vfcjwhich is alfo the principali vre,and more nearc-
\y loketh vntQ the propre cnde of the lawc, conceineth the faithftiU,
in whofe heaites already hucth and rcigncth the fpiriie of God. Foe
although they hauc the lavve written and graucn in their heanesby
the finger of God, that is ro fay , be fo affcdioncd and minded by the
dircdion of the fpiritc that they dcfire to obey God , yet do they ftill '
two waies profite in the lawe. For it is to them a very good meane,
whereby they may dayly better and more afforediy learne what is the
will of the Lord which they aff ire vnco, and may be confirmed in th^
vnderftanding thereof. As if a feruaunt be already bente with all the
aft'edion of his heartc , to pleafc his Lorde : yet hath he neede dili-
gcntely to fearche out and markc the f::^ions of his Lorde , that he
may frame and apply him felfe vraco them. And let none of vs exempt
him felfc from this necde . For no manne hath hetlierto attained to
fo great wifedomc, but that he may by dayly inftru<5ti©n of the lawc
get newe profit in preceding to the purer knowledge of Gods will.
Then bycaufe we neede not onely dodcine but alfo exhortationnhis
other profite fliall the fcruaunt of God take by the lawe , to be by the
often meditation thereof ftirrcd ?p to obedience, to be ftrengthencd
in it, to be holden backe from the flippery way of offcnding.For after
this mancr , muft thefe holy ones driue forwards them felues , which
with how great cheerefulnefle fo eucr they trauailc to Godwarde ac-
cording to tl>e fpirite, yet they are alway lodtn with the fluggifhncire
of y flelii, that they precede not with fdch ful redinefle as they ought.
To this flefh is the lawe geuen as a nhippe, that like a flowc and dull
Afle it may be pricked forwarde to worse. Yea to the fpirituall man,
bycaufe he is not yet difpatched of the burden of the flcfh , it fhall be
a continuall pricke that fu£fereth him not to ftand ijiill . Euen to this
vfe Dauid hadde refpcd , when he did fet forth the lawe with thofe
notable praifes: The lawe of the Lorde is vndefilcd, conuerting
foules-.the iufticcs of the Lorde are vpright, and chearing heartes:the Pfi«I'>5-
commaundemente ofthe Lorde is bright, thatgeueth light to the *
eyes. &c. Againc : A bunterne to my feete is thy wordc , and a light pp^ ,,^
»nto my pathes , and innumerable other that be rchcarfcth in all that 19$,
Pfalme. Neither are thefe thmges againft the fayinges of Paule,
wherein is fhe wed , not what vfc the lawe miniftrerh to the regene-
rate, but what it is able to gcue to manne of it fclfe . But here the
Prophet reporteth with howe great profite the Lorde doth inOru^
them by reading of his lawe , to whom^ he inwardely infpireth a
readynclfc to obey . And he takech holde not ofthe commaundc-
mentes oaely , but alfo the proiuife of grace annexed to the thingcs^
Cap»7« ^A the knowledge or
whiche onely maketh the bitternefle to waxc fweetc* For what
were lefle aineable than the lawe , if it fhouldc oncly with requiring
and threatening trouble foidcs carefully with fcarc , and vcxc them
with rerrour ? But fpecially Dauid Ihcweth, that he in the lawe
conceyucd the Mediatour > without whomc there is no dehtc or
fweetcncfTe.
I J Which while fome vnfkillfull men cannc not difccmc , they
boldcly (hake a way all Mofcs, and biddc the two tables of the lawe
farewell, bycaufc they thinke it is not agreable forChriftians to
cleaue to that dodrine that conteineth the miniftration of death. Let ^
this prophane opinion departefarreoutofour mindes. ForMofcs ^
taught excellently well , that the fame Lawe which with finners can
' cngrndre nothing but death , ought in the holy to haue a better and
more excellent vfe. For thus , whenlic was ready to die , he openly
Pj J faide to the people : Lay your heartes vpon all the wordcs that I do
j/"* telhfic to you this daie , that ye maie committe them to your chil-
dren , that ye maie teache them to kecpe, to do , and to fuIlfiU all the
thinj;es that are written in the volume of this lawe, bycaufc they arc
not vainely commaunded you, but that euery one fhoulde liue in
them: but ifnom:»nne cannedenie that there appearcth in it an
abfolutc paterne of rrghteoufnefle , then cither we mufte haue no
rule at all to liue iuftely and vprightely , or els it is not lawefuU for vs
to departe from it.For there are not many but one rule of hfe which
is perpetualll and canne not be bowed . Therefore , whereas Dauid
Pfal.1.2 niakeih the life of a righteous manne continually bufied in the me-
ditation of the lawe, Ictvs not rcferre that to one age oncly, by-
canfeit ismoftcmeetefbra^l ages to the cndeof the worlde: and
let vs not therefore be frayed awaic , or flee from being inftru<^ed by
it , bycaufc it appointeth a muchc more cxad holyneflc than we fhall
performe , while we fhall carry about the perfbn of our bodie. For
nowe it CKccutcth not againft vs the office of a rigorous cxader that
willnotbcfatifHcd, but with his full tafke performed : but in this
perfedion where vnto it exhorteth vs, it ihcweth vs a marke,tow3rdc
which in all our life to endeuour , is no lefTc profitable for vs , than
atreable with our dutic. In which endeuour if we faile not, it is well.
For all this life is a race, the fpace whereof being runnc out,the Lord
wil oraunt vs to atteine to that marke,towarde which our endeuourcj
dotrauaileafarreof.
14 Nowc therefore, whereas the lawe hath towarde the faithful!
a power to exhorte , not fuch a power as may binde their confcicnccs
wiih cuife, but fuche as with often calling on, may fhakc of lluggifli-
nefTc
God the Redemer. Lib.2 . 138
neffe andpirtche impcrfcdion to awake it: many when thcymcanc
to cxprefle thisdcliucrauncc from the curfc thereof, do fay , that the
lawe is abrogate to the faithful!. (I fpcake yet of the lawe morall) not
that it doth no more commaunde them that which is right, but oniy
that it be no more vnto them that which it was before, that is, that it
do no more , by making afraide and confounding their confciences,
damnc and dcftroic them. And truely fuch an abrogation of the lawe,
Paule dothe plainely teachc, and alfo that the Lord himfelfe fpake of
it , appcareth by this that he woulde not hauc confuted that opinion Mac. 5,
that he ihouldc diflbluc the lawc.vnleflc it hadde bene commonly re- »7»
ccyued among the Icwes . But forafmuch as it coulde not rife caufc-
Icfly and without any colour , it is hkely that it grewe vpon falfe vn-
derftanding of his dodrine , as m a maner all errourcs are wontc to
take occafion of truthe, but leaft we llioulde alfo ftumble at the fame
(lone, let vs diligently make diftindion, what is abrogate in the lawe,
and wliat remainethyet in force. Where the Lord protefteth that he
came not to deftroie the lawe , but to fuUfill it : and that till hcauen
and earth paiTe away, no one iote of the lawe (houlde pafTe away , but
that all (houlde be fullftlled : he fufficiently confirmeih that by his
comming nothing (hould be taken away from the due keeping of the
lawe. And for good caufe :fith he came rather for this ende, to heale
offences. Wherefore the doftrinc of the lawe rcmaineth for ail Chri-
ftians,inuiolable,which by teaching,ndmoniiliing,rebuking and cor«
rcdmg may frame and prepare vs to euery good worke.
15 As for thofe thingcs that Paule fpeaketh of the curfe,it is eui-
dent that they belong not to the very inftrudion , but onely to the
force of binding the confcience.For the lawe not onely teachethfbut
alio with authoritie requireth that whichit commaundeth . If it be
not perfourmcd, yea if duety be flacked in any piirte » it bendeth her
thunderboulte of curfe. For this caufe the Apoftle faith, that all they Qgja, ,
that are of the workes of the lawe, arc fubied to the curfe , bycaufe it i o.
is written : Curfcd is euery one , that fulfiUeth not all. And he faieth* ^'^- *!
that they be vndcr the workes of the lawe, that do not fet rightcouf- * *
ncflc in the forgeucneflc of finnes, by which we are loofed from the
rigor of the lawe. He teacheth therefore that we muft be loofed from
the bondes of the lawe, vnldfewe will miferably perilh vnder them.
But from what bondes ? the bondes of that rigorous and lliarp exa-
ding,that rcleafcih nothin" of the extremitie of thelawc,andfufircth
not any offence vnpunifhed.From this curfe(I fay)that Chrift might
redcnie vs , he was made a curfe for vs . For it is written : Curfed is- * h
euery one tliat hangeth vpon the tree. In the chapter following in ^ '
S ij.
Sw^ap.y- ^^ tne Knovvieagc or
dccdc he r^ith , that Chritt was made fubicd to the lawc , coredeme
them chat were vnder the lawc : but all in one meaning , for he by-
ondby addeth , that by adoption we might recciue the right of chil-
dren. What is that ? that wc llioulde not be oppreffed with pcrpetuall
bondagCjthat fhoulde holde our confcience faft ftrained with anguifh
of dearh. In the meane time this alway remaineth vn{hakc^ihat there
is nothing withdrawen of the authority of the lawc , but that it ought
ftill to be receiued of vs with the fame rcucrcncc and obedience.
16 Ofccremonicsitisoiherwife, which were abrogate not in
cffed, bat in vfe onely . And this , that Chrift by his comraing hath
made an endeof thcm,doth Co nothing diminifh their hohnc(Ie,that ^
it rather fctteth them forth, and maketh them glorious . For as they
(houlde haue geuqn but a vainc (hew to the olde people , vnlefTe the
power of the death Sc refurredion of Chrift had Dene (hewed therin,
fo if they had not ceafed , wc couldc not at this day difcernc to what
purpofe they were ordained. Therefore Paule, to proue that the kc-
pjngof them %9W is not onely fuperfluous,biit alfo hurtfull,teacheth
ol. J. that they were iiiadowes wherof we hatfe the body in Chrift.' Wc fee
7* therefore how in the aboU(]iingof them , the trueth fhineth better
than if they did ftill a farre of,and as it were with a veilc fprcd before,
(hewc a figure of Chrift that hath already plainely appeared . And
I^t^ jy therefore the veilc of the temple at the death of Chrift was tome in
1. twv peeces and fell downe : becaufe now the true and exprcs image
of the heauenly good thingcs was come to light , which before had
[cb. I o ^^"^ ^"^ vnperfediy begonne with darke rude daughters , as the au-
thor of the Epiftle to the Hebrues faith. Hercvnto ferueth that (aying
Ilk 16. of Chrift, that the lawc & the Prophetes were vnto the time of lohn,
*• and that from that time forwarde , the kingdomc of God bcganne to
be ioyfully preachcdnot meaning that the holy fathers were without
the' preaching that cotaineth the hope of raluation,& of ctcrnall life,
but becaufe a farre of,and vnder ihadowes only they did beholde that
which we at this day fee in the full light. But why it behoued that the
church of God llioulde climbe vp hyerfrom thofe firft inftrudions,
ohn. I. lohn the Baptift dcclareth : for that the lawc is geuen by Mofes , but
5* grace and trueth beganne by Icfus Chrift. For although the purging
of (innes were iruely promi(ed in the olde facrifices , and the Arkc of
the couenant was a fure pledge of the fatherly fauor of God : yet all
thishad bencbutadiadowe, if it had not bene grounded vpon the
grace of Chrift, wherein is founde , perfcd, and ctcrnall ftedfaftneffe.;
Let this then remaine furCjfhat although the crcmonial vfagcs of the
lawe haue ceafctl to be obfei ucd , yet by the cqdc of them it is the
better
God the Redemer. Lib.2. 13P
better knownehowe great was the profit of them btfjre Chriftes co-
ming>which in taking away the vfe oi' them hath fealcd die force and
cftcd of them with his death.
17 Somewhat more hard is the point that Paule noteth . And he Col *.
hath renued yeu together with him,when ye were dead by linncs,:ind ' *•
the vncircumcifion of your flcfh,forgiuing you all your offenceSjblot-
ting out the handwriting that remained in tlic decrees againft vs,
which was contrary vnto vs,and he hath taken it away , faftening it to
thecrolTe. &c. For he fccmeih to ftretch the abohfliingof the lawc
fomewhat further that now we haue nothing to do with the decrees
thereof. For they crrc that expqundc it of the lawe morall, whole
vnappeafablc rigor rather then dodrine thereof they thinke to be ta-
ken away. Some more depelywaying the wordes of Paule, do cfpic
that it is properly fpoken of the laWe ceremoniall , and do fiiew that
this wordc Decree, doth more than once fo fignifie in Paule . For to Ephc.i<
the Ephefians he faith thus : He is our peace, that m?' cth both to be 1 4.
one , that maketh voide the lawe of commaundcmentes confiihng in
the decrees , that he might make two in himfelfe into one nev/e man.
It is no dout that he fpeaketh there of the ceremonies , for he calicth
it the partition wherewith the Icwcs were feucrcd from the Gentiles:
wherefore Igraunt that thofc firll expofirors are rightfully rcproucd
by thefeibut yet me thinkcs ihatthefe do not fufnciently well fct forth
the minde of the Apoftle. For I like not at all, to haue thcfe two pla-
ces compared together in all pointes,when his purpofc was to aducr-
tyfe the Ephefians of their adoption into the fellowlliip of Jfracl, he
teacheth that the ftop is taken away , wherby they were before time
kept afunder, that was in ceremonies. For the vfages of wafliinges and
facrifices , wherewith the lewes were made holy vnto the Lorde , do
feuer them from the Gentiles. But in the Epiftle to the Coloflians,
who feeth not that he toucheth ahyer mifterie ? In dcede the point
of the difputation there , is of Mofaicall obferuations wherevnto the
falfe Apoftles did labor to driuc the Chriftian people. But , as in the ^
Epiftle to the Galathians he fetcheth that controuerfie further of,and
as it were bringcth it backe to the firft head iherof,fo doth he alio in
this place. For if in the ceremonies you confider nothing els but a
neceflitie of the vfe of them,to what purpofc was it,to call it a hand-
writing againft vs ? moreoner to fct the whole fumme m a mancr of
our redemption in this , that it ftiouldc be cancelled ? Wherefore the
matter it felfe tricth out,that here is fome more fecrct thing to be c6-
(idcred. And I truft that I haue attained the naturall vnderftanding of
it,if 4t 1^ this be graunted me to be true,which in one place is nioft
S iij.
Cap.8. Ofthe knowledge of
iruely written by Augaftinc , yea that he hath taken out ofthe plai'ne
Hcb.7. wordes ofthe Apoftle , that in the Iewi(h ceremonies was rather a
S/ 9.ic confcflio than a cknfingoflinnes.For what did they els by facriiices,
'•• but confefTe them felues in their confcicnce gilty of death , that did
put cienfingcs in their pIacc?Whar did they with their clenlinges, but
teft:fie them fclaes to be vncleane ? And fo was the handwriting of
iheir (inne,and vncleanncire eft renued by theni,but there was no dif-
Heb, 9. ^^hsrgc in that teftifying thereof. For which caufe the Apoflle writeth
■ 5. that at length by mcane of the death of Chrift , was perfourmed the
redemption of the offences that remained vndcr the oldc Teftamenc.
Therfore the Apoftle doth worthily cal the ceremonies handwritinges
againft thofe that obferue themrforafmuch as by them they did open-
ly feale to cheir owne damnation and vacleannefle. And it hindcrcth
nor, that rhey Were alfo partakers ofthe fame grace with vs. For this
they obrcined in Chnft, not in the ceremonies , which there the A-
poftle doch fcucr from Chnft , becaufc being at that time vfed , they
did obfcure the glorie of Chrift.Thus learne we,that the ceremonies,
if they beconfidered bythcmfelues, arc well and fitly called hand-
writinges agamft the filuationof men , becaufe they were as folemne
inftrumentes that teftified their being boundc. When the falfe Apo-
files went about to binde the Chrilhan Church to them againe. Paule
did not without caufe admonifli the Coloirians,by fetching the figni-
fication of them further of, to what pointc they ftiouldc fall backc
ag4inc,if they fufFered them felues in fuch forte to be yoked by them.
For therewifh.1l was the benefitc of Chnft wrcfted away from them,
in as much as he hauing once performed the eternall clenfing , hath
vtteily aboUfhed thofe dayly obfer nations, which were only of force
CO feale finneSjbut coulde do nothing to the putting away of them.
The viij. Chapter.
v^« ixp$fition */ the Mcrali lavve.
Ere I thinkc it (hall not be from the purpofc , to enterlace
the tennc commaundemtnies ofthe lawe with a fiiorte ex-
pohtion of them , becaufe thereby both that ftiall better ap-
pearc which I haue touched , that the fame keping of them
which God hath once appointed , remaineth yet in force : and then
ilCo we ftiall haue befides that a proofe of the feconde point, that the
lewes did not only learne by it what was the true force of godlyneflc,
but alfo by the terror ofthe judgement, fiih they faw them felues vn-
able to ktepe it , they were compelled whether they woulde or no,
to be drawen to the Mediator . Nowc in felting forth the fumme o(
thofe
H
GodthcRedemer. Lib.2. 140
thofe things that are required in the true knowledge of God,\ve hauc
allrcady taught, that we cannot conceiue him according to his grcat-
ncfTcjbut that byandby his maiefty prefenteth it felfe viito vs,to bindc
vs to the worfhip of him. In the knowledge of our felues wc haue fet.
this for the chiefc point,that being voidc of the opinion of our ownc
ftrength, and clcaneilrippcd of the truft of our owne rightcoufncti'c,
and on the other (ide difcouragcd and beaten downe with confcicncc
ofourowoenedineHe, we fhoulde learne perfed humilitie and a^
bafemcnt of our felues. The Lord fctteth forth both thcfc pointes in
hislawc, where firftchalenging to himfelfe due power to gouernc,
he calleth vs to the rcuerence of his diuinc maieftic , and apomteth
out vnto vs wherein it ftandeth and confilieth : and then pubhlTiing
a rule of his righteoufnelTe, ( againft the righteoufneffe whereof our
nature as it is pcruerfc and crooked,doth alway ftriue , and beneth the
pcrfcdion whereof our power as of it felfe it isweakcand feble to
do good, lieth a greate way bclowe) he reproueth vs both of wcakc-
nclfe and vnrighteoufncfle . Morcouer that invi/ardc lawe which we
hauc before faid to be grauen and as it were imprinted in the hartes
of al men,doth after a certainc maner enforme vs of the fame thingcs
that are to be learned of the two tables. For our confcience doth not
fuffer vs toflecpe a perpeiuall fleepe without fcehng , but thit it m-
wardly is a witneflc and admonifher of thofe ihinges that we owe to
God,and layeth before vs the difference of good and euil! , and fo ac-
cufeth vs when we fwarue from our ductie.But man hein^ wrapped in
fuch darkencfl'e of errours as he is, fkarfe cue flenderly talleih by that
lawe of nature, what worfhip pleafeth Godtbui truely he is very farrc
dilbnt from the right knowledge thereof. 6e(ide th3t,he is Co fwollcn
with arrogancie and ambition, and fo blinded with felfe loue , that he
, can not yet looke vpon,and as it wcrc,defcend into him felfe to learne
to fubmit and humble him fclfe,and confcfle his ownc miferic.Thcr'-
fore ( as it was neceffary both for our dulnelTe and ftubborncfife ) the
Lorde hath (ei vs a lawe written, which fliouldc both more certaincly
teftiRe that which in the law naturail was too obfcurc,and alfo fliould
fhakc away our drowfinelTe , and more liuciy touche our minde and
rcmembraunce.
2 Nowe it is eafy to vnderftand what is to be learned of the lawe,
that is, that as God is our creator,fo of right he hath the place of our
father and Lorde , and that by this reafon we owe to him glorie , rc-
uerence , loue and feare. Yea and al(b that we are not at our owne li-
bertie, to followc whether fo euer 'hat luft ofour minde doth moue
VI, but tha; we ought to hang v^^on his beckc, and to reft onely vpoq
S in'},
Cap.8, Of the knowledge of
that which plcafcth him. Then we Icame , thai he deliteth in rightc-
OAjfneffe and vpnghtcneflcjthat he abhorrcth wickednefTcjarKl there-
fore, that vnlcffe wc will with wicked vnthankcfulnelTe fall away from
our creator, we muft neccflfarily obfcruc righteoufnclJc all our life log.
For if then only wc yelde vn|p him the reuercnce that wc owe, when
wc prefer his will before our owne , it foUoweth , thas there is no o-
ther due worfhip of him, but the obferuation of righteoufneflcjholy-
nefle & cleannelfe. Neither may we pretend tliis excufe that we want
power, and like wafted detters be not able to pay. For it is not con-
Bcnient that we flioulde meafurc the glory of God by our ownc
power : for whatfocuer wc be, he aiway abideth like to himfelfe, a
louer of righteoufneirc , a hater of wiikcdnefle . What foeucrhc re-
quireth of vs (bccaufe he ca require nothing but that which is right)
by bonde of nature we mufte of neceflitie obey : but that we arc not
able, is our owne fault. For if we be holden boundc of our owne luft
whcrinfinreignethjfo y we arc not lofe at liberiie to obey our father,
there is no caufe why wc ftiould allege neceffitic for our defencc,thc
cuill wherof is both within vs, and to be imputed vnto our felues.
5 When we haue thus farre profited by the teaching of the lawc,
then muft we by the teaching of the fame lawe alfo defcend vnto our
felues : whereby at length we may cary awaic twothmges. The firft
iSt by comparing the righteoufntfTe of the lawe with our life, to
leame,that we arc farre of from bemg able to fatisfic the will of God,
and that therefore wc are not worthy to haue place among his crea-
tures , much IciTc to be rcckened among his children. T he Cccond is,
in con/idcring our ftrcngth , tolcarncthac it is not onely rnfufficient
to fiilfill the lawe , but alfo vtterly none at aJI . Hereupon followeth
both a diftruft of our owne ftrength , and a care and ft arcfullfulTc of
mindc. For confciencc can not bcarc the burden of iniquiric,but that
byandby the iudgement of God is prcfem before it : and the iudge-
ment of God can not be fclte , but that it ftriketh into vs a dreadcfuU
horrour of death. And hkewife being conftrained with proues of her
ownc weakenelTc, it can not choofe but byandby fall into defpeirc of
her own ftrength.Both thcfe affcAi5s do engendre humility & abate-
ment of courage. Soatlengthitcommethtopaflc, that man made
afraide with feling of eternal death,which hefceth to hang oucr him
by the deferuing of his ownc vnrighteoufnelTc , turneth him fclfe to
the only mercy of God, as tathe oncly hauen of faluationjthat feling
that it is not m his power to pay that he oweth vnto the lawe,defpci-
ring in him felfe, he may take breath againe and bcginnc to craue and
lookc for helpc from cIs where.
4BUC
GodthcRcdemer. Lib.2. 141
4 But the Lord not contented to hauc procured a reuerece of his
rightcoufnefle, hath alfo added piomifes and threatnin^cs, to Hil our
heartes with loue of him,and with hatred of wickcdncfle.Forjbecaufc
our minde is to blinde,to be moued with the onely btauiy of good-
neflc,it pleaded the moft mercifull Father of his tender kindcnefle, to
allure vs with fwectcneflc of rcwardes,to loue and long for him . He
pronounceth therefore, that with him arc rewardes layd vp for vcr»
tue,and that he Ihall not fpendc his labour in vainc, whofoeuer he be,
ihat (hall obey his commaundementes.He prociaimcth on the other
(ide,thathe not only abhorreth vnrigbteoul'neflejbut alfo that it fhal
not efcape vnpunifhed5for that he will be a reuenger of the contempt
of his maiefty . And to exhort vs by all mcancs, he promifeth as well
the blcflinges of tliis prefent life,as alfo cternall bleflednefle,to their
obedience chat kecpc his commaundementes : and to the tranfgrc(^
fours therofjhe threatneth both prefent miferics and the puniihmenc
of eccrnall dcath.For the fame promife,(he that doth thefc thinges,
iliall hue in them : )and alio the chreateningc that anfwcrcth it, ('the L«u-»5«
foulc that finnethjthat fame fhall die)do without dout belong to the ^' g
immortality or death that is to come, and fhall ncuer be ended. Albc- Sc io»
it, whe^ efocuer is mentioned the good will or wrath of God , vndcr
the one is contained the eternity of hfe, vndcr the other eternall de-
ftfudion. Of prefent blcflinges andcurfes theve is a long regifter re-
hearfcd in the law. And in the penall ordjnauoces appearcth the fo- Lcu.a^
ucraigne cleannefTe of God,that can fuffer no iniqu)ty:but in his pro- 4-
mifeSjbefide his great loue of righteoufnt ire,Cwh>ch he cannot Hnde D«'*^t
in his heart to defraude of her reward J ihcre is alio proucd his mar-
uelous bountifullneflc. For whereas we and all ours arc indettcd vnto
his maicfty,by good right whatfoeuer he rcquircth of vs,hc demaun-
dcth it as due det , but the payment of det is not worthy of re war dc.
Thcrfore he deparceth with his owne right,whe he offereth reward
to our obediences, which we do not yeld of our fclues as tilings that
were not due:but what thofe promifes do bring vnto Vs, is partly fayd
already,and partly fhall appeare more plainly in place fit for it.lt fuffi-
ceth for this prefent,if we remember and confider,that there is in the
promifes of the law,no fmall commendation of righteoufncfle,that it
may the more certainely appeare howe much the kecpinge thereof
pleafeth God : that the penall ordinaunces arc fct for the more detc-
ftation of vnrighteoufncffejlcaft the (inncr,delited with the fwete flat*
terings of vices, (hould forget that the iudgcmcnt of the lawmaker is
prepared for him.
5 Now whcrc^is the Lord giuing a rule of perfc^ rightcoufnefle.
f^ap.5. Ur tncknowiedge ot
iiath applied all the partes thereof to his owne will,cherein is decU*
red that nothing is to him more acceptable than obedience , which
is fo much more diligetly to be marked, as the wantonncffe ofmans
cninde js more ready to deuile nowc and then diuerfe fortes of wot-
fliippmg to winne his fauour wuhail. For in all ages that irreligious
aftcdation of religion , bccaufe it is naturally planted in the wittc of
man,hath (hewed and yet doth iliew foor th it fclfe,that men do al\Vay
dcliteto inuentaway toobcaine righteoufneflebefide the word of
Godjwherby it commcth to pafTcthat the comniaundementes of the
law haue but fmale place among the workes that are commonly cal-
led good works, while that innumerable route of mens workes occu- '
[>eo.ii. picthalmoftalltheroome . But what other thing meant Mofe.\ than
i*. to reftraine fuch licentioufncfl'e, when after the publifliing of the law
he fpakc thus to the people.Giue heede, and heare all y things that I
commaund thee , that it may he well to thee and to thy children-after
thee for euer , when thou Hiait do that which is good and pieafauni
before thy God . What I commaunde chec, that onely cio:addc not
vnto it,nor diminiili it. And before, when he had proteftcd, that this
was his wifedom and vnderi^.anciing before other nations that he had
receiucd iudgementcs,righteoufnirflc and ceremonies of the Lord,he
fayd further, kcepe therefore thy fclfe & thy foulc carcfully,that thou
forget not thewordes which thine eyes haue feenc, and that at no
time they fall out of thy heart. Forjbecaufc God did forefee^thac the
Ifraelites wouldc not reft , but that after they had receiued the lawc,
they would bcfidc it trauaile in bringinge foorth new righteoafneffe,
if they were not feuerely holden backertherfore he prone unccih that
herein is contained the perfedion of righteoufhtfle , which Hiou'de
haue bin the ftrongeft ftay to hold them backc, and yet ihcy did ccH'c
from that boldneffe fo much forbidden them. But whatof vs?we arc
furcly comprehended within the fame charge: for it is no dout that
that continueth ftill whereby the Lord hath chalengcd to his law the
abfolutc dodnne ofrighteoufncfTe , yet we not contented thcrwith,
domonftruoufly trauaile with forgingc and coyninge of ncwe e.ood
workes one vpon an other . For the healing of this fault, the beft re-
medy (lialbfjif this thought rtialbe ftedfaftly fettled in vSjthat the law
is giucn vs from God to teach vs a perfcd righteoufhefle: that therin
is taught no rit^hteoufne/fc, but the fame that is examincd.by the ap-
pointed rule of Gods will : that therefore new formes of workes arc
vamely attempted to winne tlic fauour of God , vvhofe true worlTiip
ftandeth in onely obedience: but rather that fuch ftudy of good works
as wandereth out o{ the Uwe of God , is an intolerable dcBlin^ze pf
Gods
God the Rcdcmer. Lib.2, 142
Gods rightcoufnes and of the cruc righteoufnes Auguftins alfo faych lib.4.
molt truely, which callcth the obedience that is done co God,(bmc- ^ .^^"^*
lime the mother and kecperjfomcime the originall of all vertues. ^ j^' jp**
6 But when we haue expounded the lawe of the Lord , then more bono
fitly and with more profite (hail that be confirmed which I liaue be- coniu-
forc fpoken of the office & vfe of the law. But before that 1 beginnc ?•*'' '»-
to difculFe cuery feuerall commaundcmcnt by it felfe,it fliall be good J," ^ •
now to giuc fuch IcfTons as ferue to the vniucrfall knowledge therof. gi$ ac '
Fii ft let vs hold for determined, that the life of ma is inftrudcd in the proph.
law not oncly to outward honcfty , but alfo to inward and (pirituall ^«
righteoufnelTe . Which thingc whereas no man can deny ,yet there
be fewc that rightly marke it. That commeth to pnfle , becaufe they
looke not vponthelawmaker,by whofe nature the naturcof the law
alfo ought to be weyed.If any king do by proclamation forbid to c6-
mit fornication , to kill, or to ftealerin this cafe I graunt that if a man
do only conceiuc in his minde a luft to commit fornication, to finne,
or to ftealc,and do not commit any of thefe thinges in dede.hc is out
ofthecompaffcof this prohibit;©. And the reafon is,for that becaufc
the forelight ofa mortal lawmaker, could not extend but to outward
ciuihty : his commaundementcs are not broken , but when the out-
ward offL-ncesare committed. But God(whofc eye nothing efc jpcih,
and which rcgardeth not fo much the outward fhew as the cleannes
of the heart ) vnder the forbiddmg of fornication, manflaughter and
thefr,forbiddeth luft, wrath,hatred,coueting of an other mans,guile,
and whatfoeuer is like to thefe. For infomuch as he is a fpirituallaw-
niaker,he fpeaketh nolcfle to the foule than to the body.But the ma-
flaughter of the foule, are wrath and hatred:the theft of the foule, is
cuell defire and couetoufnefle : the fornication of the foule , is luft.
But mans lawes alfo ( will fome man fay ) haue regard to ententes 6c
willes,and not to fucccfles of fortune. 1 graunt,but yet they arc fuch
ententes and willes, as haue outwardly broken our. They weyc with
what cntent euery outwarde ad hath bin done, but they fcarchc
not the fccrete thoughtes . Therefore they are farisficd when a man
onely wirhholdeth his handes from offendinge . On the other fide,
becaufe the heauenly lawe is made for our mindes , therefore the
reftrainte of myndes is principally needefull to the keepingc there-
of. But the common forte of mennc, cuen when they mightily
diftemblc there contempt of the lawe, do frame their eyes , their
fccte, their handes, and all the partes of their body to fome obferua-
tion of the law,in the meane time they hold their heart moft farre of
from all obedience, aod thinke chemfelues well difcharged , if they
Cap.8, Of the knowledge of
kcepe clofe fro men y which they do in the fight ofGod.They bearc
it fayd : Thou fWalt not kill : Thou (hah not commit adultery : Thou
fcalt not ftcale : they draw not out their fwerd to kill : they ioyne not
their bodies with harlots: they lay not their handes vpon other mens
goods. All this IS well hithcrto.But m their whole hearies they breath
out murders , they boileinluft, they caft their eyes a(ide at all mens
goods, and dcuour them with couetingc. Now warttcth that which
was the chicfe pomt of the lawe. Whenfc,! pray you , commeth fo
groffc dulncfle , but that leauing the lawe'makcr, they rather meafurc
righteoufnelfe by their ownc wit? Againft thefe doch Paul mightily
j^ crie oat,affirming that the law is fpirituall: whereby he mcaneth,thac '
it not onely demaundeth an obedience of the foulc , mindc and will,
but alfo requireth an Angelike purcnefTc, which hauing all the filthi*
ncfle of the flcfh cieane wiped away , may fauour nothinge but of the
fpiritc.
7 When we fay that this is the meaningc of the lawe , we thruft
not in a new expofition of our ownc , but v/e follow Chrift the beft
expofitour of the law. For when the Pharifees had infcded the peo-
ple with a filfc opinion , that he performeth the law that hath with
outrward worke committed nothing^againft the law, he reproued this
moft perilous crrour , and pronounced that vnchaft lookmg at a wo-
man is fornication : he protcfted that ihey are manflayers that hate
their brother, for he makcth them gilty of iudgement that haue but
conceiued wrath in their minde,and them gilty of the counfellthaC in
murmuring or grudging haue vttered any token of a difpleafed mind:
and them gilty of Hell ner,that with tauntcs and railing breake forth
into open anger. They that haue not efpied thefe thinges, haue fay-
ned Chrift to be an other Mofes,the giuer ofthe law of the Gofpell,
which fupplied theimperfedionof the law of Mofcs - Whereupon
commeth that common principle of the perfedion ofthe law of the
Golpell, which far pafleth the old law, which is a moft pernicious o-
pinion.For hcreafter,where-we llialj gather a fumme ofthe comaun-
dementes, it {hall appeare by Mofes himfelfe,how reprochfully they
difhonor the law of God . Truely it fhev/eth that all the holinefff of
the fathers did not much differ from hypociifie,& it Icadeth vs away
from that only and perfed rule of righitoufncffe. But it is very eafic
to confute that en our: for that they thought that Chrift did adde vn-
to the law, whereas he did but rcftore the l.iW to her intej^ritv , while
he made it frec,& denfcd it being obfcurcd with hes,and defiled with
Icuen ofthe Pha rift s.
8 Let thu be our fecond note, that there is alway more contayncd
in
GodthcRcdemcr. Lib»2. 143
in the commaundemcntes and prohibitions,than is by words cxprci^
red,which yet is fo to be tcmpcred,thac it be not like a Lesbion rule,
whereby liientioufly wrefting the Scriptures, we may make of cuerjr
thing what wc hft.For many bring to paflc by this Ynmeafured hbcr-
ty of running at largejihat with fomc the authority of Scnpturc gro-.
weth in contempt^ind other fomc defpeire of vnderftandingit.Thcr*
fore, if it be pofliblc, wc muft take fome fuch way , that may by right
and perfed path lead vs to the will of God , wc muU I fay fearch how
farrc our cxpofition may exceede the boundcs of the wordes, that it
may appearc that it is not an additio of mens glofes ktwt to the word
of God, but rather that the pure and naturail meaning of the langi-
ucr is faithfully rendrcd. Truely in a manner in all the commaunde«
mentes it is fo manifcft, that there are figuratiue fpeaches, mcanin^e
more in cxpreffing parte that he may worthily be laughed at chat will
reftraine the meaning of the law to the narrowneffe of the wordes.It
is euident thcrforc, that fober expofitio doth pnfle beyond the worda:
but how farre, that remayneth hard to iudge , vnlcife there be fomc
meafurc appointed •• wherefore I thinkethis to be the beft meafure,
that if it be dirededto the cnict of the commaundement,thatis,that
in euery commaundement be weyed,why it was giuen vs. As forex-
ample:Eucry commaundement is cither by way of bidding,or of for*
bidding ; the tructh of both fortes (hall foorth with be founde, if wc
confidcr the intent or the end thereof. As the end of the fift cotnmau*
dement is , that honor is to be giuen to them to whom God appom«
tcth It. This therefore is the fumme of the commaundement , that ic
is right and pleafeth God , that wc honor them to whom he hath gi-
uen any excellency , and that he abhorreth contempt and ftubborn-
nefTc againft them . The intent of the firft commaundement is, that
God alone be honored . The fumme therefore of the commaunde<-
ment fhall be , that true godlineflc , that is to fay , true wor{hipp«c of
his maicfty pleafeth Godjand that he abhc^rcth vngodlineflc.So in c-
uery commaundement we muft looke > vpon what matter it treatcth:
then muft wc fearch out the cnde , till we finde what the lawemakcr
doth teftifie therein properly to pleafe or difpleafe himrand laft of all
mtift we draw an argument from the fame to the contrary , after this
manenlf this pleafeth God, then the contrary difpleafcth him:if this
difpleafe himjthen the contrary pleafeth liim : if he commaunde this,
then he forbiddeth the contrary, if he forbid this then he commaim-
deth the contrary.
9 That which is now fomewhat darkely touched,(hall in expoun«
ding of the commaundcmcnis become ycry pbine by pradifc^whci;'^
^ap.5. KJt tne Knowicagc or
fore ic fuffifeth to haue touched it,fauinge chat this laft point,is to be
ihortly confirmed with fomc proufe thercof,becaufc othcrwifc either
it Hiould not be vnder{landed,or being vnderfliand, it might perhaps
at the beginning fccmc to found hke an abfurdity , This ncedcth no
proofe,tnat when a good thing is commaunded,the cuill is forbidden
that IS contrary to it:for there is no man but he wil graunt it me. And
common iudgement will not much ftickc to admitte » that when cuill
thinges are forbidden,the contrary dueties arccommaundcd.lt is an
vniuerfail opinion that vertues are commended, when the contrary
vices are condened.But we require fomwhatmore than thofe formes
of fpcach do fi^nifie commonly among the people. For they for the
rood parte take the venue contrary to any vice,to be the abftainingc
from the fame vice .• we fay that it proceedeth farthcr,that is to con-
trary dueties & doings.Therfore in this commaundemet, Thou Ihalt
not kill the common fenfc 6f men will conh'der nothing elfe,but that
we muft abftaine fro all hurt doing> or luft to do hurt. I fay that there
is further contained, that we ihould by all the hclpcs that we may,
fuccour the life of our neighbour. And, leait I fpeakc without a rea-
fon,l proue itHhus.God forbiddcth that our brorher be hurt or mif-
ufedjbecaufe he willcth that.our neighbours life be deare & precious
vnto vs:hc doth therfore require withal thofe duties of louc that may
be done by vsfory preferuatjonof it. And fo may we fee how the end
ofthccommaundementdoth alway difclofe vnto vs all that we are
therein commaunded or forbidden co do.
lo Butwhy God, infuchasitwerchalfecomaundcmenteSjhath
by figures rather fccretly (ignified , than exprefled what his will was,
whereas there are wont to be many reafons rendered thcrofjthis one
realbn pleafcth me aboue the reft. Becaufe y flcfh alway cndeuoreth
to extenuate the fiithineffe of ^nne,& to colour it with fairc pretcn-
fcs/auing where it is eue palpable for grofleneSjhe hath fet forth for
an example ineuery kinde of otfenfe that which was moft wicked &
abhominable , at the hearing whereof our very fenfcs might be mo-
ued with horrour, thereby to imprint in our mindes a more haynous
dctcftinge of euery forte of finne . This many times deceiucth vs in
weying of vices,that if they be any thing fecret,we make them fecme
fmall.Thefe deceitcs the Lord doth difclofctwhen he accuftometh vs
to referrcall the whole multitude of vices to thefe principall heades,
which do beft of all lhcvv,how much euery kinde is abhominable. As
for example , wrath and hatred arc not thought fo haynous euills,
when they are called bv their owne namcs,but whe they are forbidde
VS vndcr the name of mantlaughtcr,we better vndcrftand how abho-
mina*
OodtneKcaemcr, 1.1D.2. 144
minable they arc before God, bywhofc word they are fctin the
degree of fo horrible an ofl'cnfc:and we moucd by his iudgcment,do
accuftome our fclues better to wey the hayaoufnclTc of thole faulccs
that before fcemed but hght vnto vs.
1 1 Thirdly is to be confidcred, what mcancth the diuiding of the
laweof God into two tables , whereof all wife men will iudgc that
there is fomctimc mention made not vnfitly from the purpofc, nor
without caufc. And we haue a cnufe ready,th3t doth noc fuSlr vs to
rcmaync in dout of this matter. For God fo diuided his law into two
parteSjin which is contayned the whole righteoufncfle, that he hath
affigned the firft to the ducties of religio that do peculiarly pertamc
to the worfliipping of his Godhead, the other to the dueties of Cha -
rity v/hich belong vnto men . Thciirft foundation of righteoufncfle
is the worfliip of God : which being once ouerthrowen,all the othcc
members of righteoufnefle arc tome in funder and diflblued , hkc to
the partes of a houfe vniointed and fallen do wne . For what manner
of nghteoufncffe wilt thou call it, that thou vexeft noc menne with
robbery & extorcionsjif in the mcanc time by wicked facnlegc thou
fpoylclt Gods maiefty of his glory ? that thou defilcft not thybodjr
with fornication , if with thy blafphemics thou prophancly abufe the
facrcd name of God?that thou murthercft no man,if thoutrauaill to
dcftroy and cxtinguifh the memoric of God. Wherefore righteouf-
nefle is vainly borted of without religion , & maketh no better {hcw>
than if a mangtled body with the head cutte of, (houldc be brought
foorth for a beautifull fight . And religion is not onely the principall
parte of righteoufnts, but alfo the very foulc whcrwith it breatheth:
and is quickned. For men kecpe not equity and louc among thcmfel-
ues without the fearc of God. I herefore we fay, that the wor(hip of
God is the beginning and foundation of righteoulhes, becaufc when
ii IS taken away ail the equity, continence and temperance chat trcn
vfe amonge themfclucSjis vaine and triflingc before God. We fay al-
fo that 11 IS the fprin^e heade and liuely breath of rightcoufnefTcbe-
caufe hereby men do learne to hue amonge themfelues temperately
& without hurt doing one to an other, if they rcucrence God as the
iudge ©flight and wrongc. Wherefore in fhe firft table he inftru«^cth
v$ to godlincflc and the proper dueties of religion,whcrcwith his ma-
iefty is to be worfhippcd : in the other he prefcribcthhowc forthc
feares fake of liis name,wc ought to behauc our felues in the fellow-
(liip of men. And for this reafon our Lord(3S chc Euangeliftes rchcrfe M.^^2»
it)did in a lummc gaihcr the whole lawe into two principall pointcs, ^J' ^
the one that we Ihould ioue God with all our heai'c,vvith all out foule,^/.
<rap.8. Ofthc knowledge of
with all out ftrength : the other, that we loue our neighbour a$ our
felucs.Thus thou fecft how of the two partes wherein he con<:ludeth
the whole law, he diredeth the one toward God, & appointeth the
other toward men.
li But although the whole lawe be contained in two principnll
pointes,yer,ro the ende to take away all pretenfe of excufe, n pleafcd
our Godjto declare in the ten comaundemcnts more largely & plain-
ly all things that belong both to the honor,feare & loue of himfeifc,
and alfo to that charity which he commaundeth vs to bcare to men
for his fake And thy ftudy is not ill fpent to know the diuifion ofthc
commaundcmentes , fo that thou remember that it is fuch a matter
wherein euery man ought to haue his iudgement free , for which we
ought not contentioufly to itriue with him that thinketh otherwife. "
But we muft needes touch this point, leaft the readers fhoulde either
fcorne ot maruell at the diuifion that we fliall ?(c , as newe and lately
dcuifed. That the law is diuided in ten words, becaufe it is oft appro-
ued by the authority of God himfelfe,it is out of controuer(ie,whcr-
fore there is no dout of the number, but of the manner of diuidingc.
They thatfo diuidethem , that they giue three commaundcraenrs to
the firft iable,and put other 7. into the fecondjdo wipe out of the nu-
ber the commaundement concerninge images,or at leaft they hide it
vndcr the firftrwhereas without dout it i? feuerally let by the Lord for
a commaundement, and the tenth'commaundtment of not coueting
the things of his neighbour,rhey do fondly tcarc into tvvo.Befide that
it (hall byandby be done to vnderftand, that fuch manner of diuiding
was vnknowen in the purer age. Other do recken,as we do,fower fe-
uerall comaundcmcntes in the hrft table,but in place of the firil they
fet the promife without the commaundement. As for mejbccaufe vn-
IcfTe I be conuinced by euident reafon , I take the ten wordes in Mo-
fes for ten commaundemcntcs , me thinkes I fee fo many diuided in
very fit order. Therefore, leaumg to them their opinion,! will follow
that which I beft allowe , that is, that the fame which thefe later forte
make the.firft commaundement , (halbe in ftcede of a preface to the
whole law.and then {hal follow the commmaundements,foure cf the
firil cable,and fixe of the feconde, in fuch order as they ftialbe rehear-
ibr. 2. fed. Auuuftme alio to Boniface agrceth with vs which in rehearfingc
"•J*^* them kepeth tliis order: that God onely be ferued with obedience of
* • religion , that no idole be worfiiipped , that the name of the Lord be
not taken in vaine , when he had before feuerally fpoken of the Iha-
dowiftie commaundement of the Sabbat . In an other place in decdc
ibat fiift diuifion pUafcthhim,butfor to fcknder a caufcy that is,be-
caufe
GodtheRcdemcr. Lib.2. 145
faufe in the number of three, if the firft table colift of three comaun-
dementcSjthcmiftery of the trinity more plainly appeareth. Albeit in
the fame place he ftjcketh not to confcfTe that otherwife he rather li-
keth our diuifion. Befide thefCjChe author of the Vnperfed vvoi kc v-
^n Matthew is of our fide.Iofcphus,vndoutedly according to the co-
mon confcnt of his time , afligneth to either table fiue commaunde-
ments.Which is both againft reafon, becaufe it confoundeth tlic di-
ftindion of religion & charity , and alfo is confuted by the authority
of the Lord himfelfe,which in Matthew reckeneth the commaunde-
mentof honoringe our parcntes, in the number ofthefecond table. ,^^^*
Now let vs heare God himfelfc (peaking in his owne wordes.
The firft commaundemcnr.
J am the Lord thy Godyxvhkh haue brought thee out of the lande
ofjiEsyft, out of the houfe of bondage ► Thoujha/t haue no
firaunge Gods before my face.
t J Whether you make the firft fcntencc a parte of the firft com«
maundemet>orreadit feucraliy,it is indifferent to mc^io that you do
not deny me that it ftandeth in ftedc of a preface to the whole lawc.
Firft in making of lawcs is hcede to be takcnjthat they be not ftionly,
- after abrogate by contempt. Therfore God firft of all prouideth,that
the maiefty of the law that he fhal make,may ncuer at any time come
in contempt. For ftabhftiinge whereof he vfeth three maners of ar-
gumentes. Firft he chalcngeth to himfelfe power and right of domi-
nion,whcreby he may conftraine his chofen people,that they muft of
neceffity obey him:the he fetteth forth a promife of grace v/iih fwct-
nefie therof to allure them toftudy of holines.Thirdly he reciteth the
benefit that he did for them,io reproue the Icwcs of vnthankefulncs,
i( they do not with obedience anfwcre his kindoes. Vnder the name
of Iehouah)the Lordjis meant his authority & lawful dormnion.And
'*if all things be of him and do abide in him,it is right that all things be
. referred to him,as Paulc fayth, Therfore we are with this word alone Rom,
fufficiently brought vnder the yoke of Gods maiefty,becaufe it were 3*»
monftruous for vs to fceke to withdrawe our feluds irom vnder his
gouernmcntjOut of whom we can not be.
' 14 After that he hath fliewed that it is he that hath power to
c6maund,to whom obedience is due, leaft he lliould fecme to draw
by onely neceflity, he alfo allureth with fwetenefte in pronouncing,
that he is the God of the Church. For there is hidden in this fpeach
a mutuall relation,which is contained in the promiferl will be to the ^*'** ^
a God,& they (halbe to me a people. Wherupon Chrift proueth that ^/^^ ,
I
Cap. 8. Of the knowledge of
Abraham, Ifanc and Jacob hauc immortall lifc> by this that Gdd t«-
ftified that he is their God. Wherefore it is as much in efFed, as if he
(hould fay thus : I hauc chofcn you to be my people , not only to do
ou good in this prcfentlife , but alfo to giue you y blelTednss of the
ifc to come.Buc to what end this tendeth , it is noted in diuerfe pla-
ces in the law. For when the Lord doth vouchfauc to deale thus mer-
cifully with vs, to call vs into the company of his people, he chofcth
^*j 3j vs (fayth Mofcs)that wc fhoulde be a peculiar people vnto himfelfc,a
'^ x6. holy people,& fhould kepe his commaundcments. From whcnfe alfo
J- Cometh this exhortation: Be ye holy/or I am holy .Now out of thefe
eu. 1^ tyyQ js Jcriued that protcftatio that is in the Prophet:Thc fonne ho-
lal 1.6 "^J^cth the fatherland the feruaunt honoreih his Lord.If I be a Lord,
where is my feare?If I be a f3rher,where is my loue ?
1 5 Now followcth the rchearfall of hrs benefit, which ought ta
be of fo much more force to moue vs,as f fault of vnthankcfuUnes is
more deteihble euen among men, He then did put Uracil in remem-
brance of a benefit lately done, but fuch a one as for the miraculous
greatnefle therof being worthy to be had in remembrance for cuer,
fliould remaine in force with their pofterity Morouer it is moft agrc-
ab!c for this prcfent mattcr.For y Lord fccmcth to fay that they were
dcliuered out of miferable bondage for this purpofe,that they fhould
with obedience and rcdines of feruice honor him,the author of their
dcliuerance.He vfeth alfo5(to the end to hold vs faftin the true wor-
fhipping of him 3lone)to fct out himfelfe with ccrtaine ritles,wherby
he maketh his facrcd maicfty to be differently knovven from all idols
& forged gods.Forjas I fayd beforejfuch is our redy inclinatio to va-
nity ,ioyned with rafh boldneSjy fo foone as God is named,our minde
can not take hede to it fclfc,but that it byandby falleth away to fomc
vaine inuention.ThcrfGre,when the Lord mcancth to bring a remedy
for this rrtifchiefe , he (etteth out his ownc godhead with certainc ti-
tlcsand fo doth compafl'e vs in,as it were within ccrtaine grates,Icaft
we {hould wander hither and thither & rafhly forge our felues forrw
nev^ God, if forfaking y liuing God,vve (hould ered an idoIe.For this
C3ufe,fa oft'as the Prophetes mcane properly to point out him,thoy
cloth Iiim, and as it were endofe him,withinrhofe markes, whereby
he had opened himfelfe to the people of Ifraell, And yet when he is
called the God of Abraha,or the God of Ifraell,whenhe is fet in the
,mo5.t temple ofHierufalem among the Cherebins , thefe & hke formes of
fpeachc do not binde him to one place or to one people , but are fct
'^ •*• onely for this purpofe,to ftay the thoughts of the godly in that God,
f/«o. 2 which by his couenantjthat he hath made with Ifraclljhath fo reprc-
:^9,i fented
GodthcRedemcr. Lib.2. 14^
Tented himfclfe , that it is no way lawfull to vary from fuch a parerne. ^^ J7
. But let this rcmainc ftedfaftly emprinted, that there is mention m^cic * ^'
of the deUuerance to this cnd,that the Icwes might the more chcrc-
. fully giuc themfelues to the God that dr>th by right claime them vn-
to nim.Andwc(leaft we fhould thinkc that the fame nothing belon*
geth to vs, ) ought to confider, that the bondage of iEgipt is; a figure
of the fpiritual capiiuityjwherm we are all holdcn boud,vnril our he-
ucnly deliuerer do make vs free by the power oi his arme, & conucy
vs into the kingdom of liberty. As thcrforc, when in the old time he
mmded to gather together the Ifraelites that were fcattcrcd abroad,
to the worlhipping of his name,he dehuercd them out of the intole:-
rable dominion of Pharao,whervvith they were opprcfl'ed.'fo al thoic
to who at this day he profcfleth himfelfe a God,hc doth now-deliucr
fro the deadly power of the deuil, which was in a fhadow figniHed by
f corporal! bondage. Wherfore there is no man,buc his minde ought
to be inflamed to harken to the law which he heareth to haue proce-
ded fro the foueraigne king. From whom as all things take their be-
ginning, fo is it meete that they haue alfo their cndc appointed & di-
reded to him.There is no manfl fayjbut he ought to be rauiflied to
embrace the lawmaker, to the keeping of whofe commaundementes,
he is taught that he is peculiarly chofen:fro whofc- bounty he looketh
both for flowing ftore of all good things,& alio the glory of immor-
tall hfe:by whofe maruelous power and mercy , he knoweih himfelfe
to be deliuered out of the iawes of death.
x6 After that he hath grounded and ftablilhed ihe authority of his
lawjhe fetteth forth the firft c6maunden»ent,T^-?/ we hatte no fhcunge
Gods before him. The endcof this comniaundemcntis,thatGod will
only haue preeminccie, and wholly enioy hisowne authority among
hispeopIc.Andthatitm.iy fo be,he commaundeth that there be far
from vs all vngodlines and fuperftirion,whereby the glory of his god-
bcade is either diminifhcdor obfcured: and by the fame reafon he
commaundeth, that we worfhippc and honor him with true endc-
- uour of godlinefie. And the very fimplicity of the wordes themfelues
do in a manner exprelTe the fame. For we cannot haue God, bur wc
, iDuft alfo comprehende therein all thinges that properly belonge to
him. Whereas therfore he forbiddeth vs to haue other Gods,he mea-
neth therby, that we fhouid not giue away clfcwhcre ^ which is pro-
pre to him.For although y things y we owe vnto God be innumera-
ble,yct not vnfitly they may be brought vnto fourc principal points:
Adorafion , whereunro as a thing hanging; vpoh it,is adioynedlpiri-
tual obedience of c6fciencc;AfSancc,inuocation,& Thankcfgiuing.
T ij.
Cap, 8. Of the knowledge of
Adoration I call the reuerece & worHiip which euery one of vs yecf-
derh vnto him,when he fubmiiceth himfelfcynto his grcatnes:wher«
fore I do not without caufe make this a pare therof,y we yceidc our
confcicnces in fubiedidn to his lawe. Affiance is an alfurednes of rc-
ftin^ in him by reknowledging of his powers,whe repofing al wifdom,
righteoufneSjpowefjtructh and goodnes in him^we thinkc our felues
blelTed with oncly partaking of him. Inuocationjis a reforting of our
minde to his faith and help as to our only fuccour, fo oft as any nC'
ceflity prefTcth vs. Thankefgiuing, is a certaine thankefulnes wherby
the praifc of all good things is giuen vnto htm. Of thefe,as God fuf-
freth nothing to be conoeyed away clfe where/o he commaunded all
to be wholly giuen to him felfc. Neither Ihalit be enough ro abftainc
from hauing any ftraungc God,vnleffe thou r eftrainc thy felfe in this, "
that many wicked cotemncrs are wontjwhich thitikc the redicft way,
to fcorne all religions.-but true religion muft go before, whereby our
mindcs may be direded to the liuinge God, with knowledge whereof
"they being enducd,may afpire to rcuercnce, feare & worfhip his ma:-
ielty,to embrace the communicatinge of all his good thinges , euery
where to feeke for his help , to reknowledgc and aduaunce with con-
feffion of praife the magnificence of his works,as to the only markc
in all the doings of our life. Then, that wc beware of pcruerfe fuper-
ftirionjwhereby our mindes fwaruing from the true God,are dra wen
hither and thither as it were vnto diuerfe gods. Wherefore, if wc be
cotentcd with one God,let vs call to remembrance that which is be-
fore faid>that all forged gods are to be driucn farrc away,and that the .
worfiiip is notto be torne in funderjWhich he alone clatmeth to hini-
felfe. For it is not lawfull to take away any thing from his glory ^be it
neuer fo litle, but that all thinges that belong to him»may wholly rc-
mainc with him . The percell of fentence that followeth ( Before my
face)encreafeth the hainoufnes.-for that God is prouoked to ialoufy,
fo oft as we thruft our owne inuentions in his place , as if an vnchaft
woman by bringing in an adulterer openly before her husbands eyes
fhonid the more vexe his minde . Therefore when God tcftificd that
with his prefent power & grace he looked vpony people that he had
chofen , the more to fray them from the wicked ad of falling from
hjm, he giueth them warning rhat there can be no new gods brought
in,but that he is witnes and beholder of their facrilege.For this bold*
ut^^Q. is encreafed with much wickednefle , that man thinketh that in
his fleinges away he can begile the eyes of God . On the other fide,
'God crieth out that whatfoeuer we purpofcjwhatfoeuer we go about
whaifoeuer we pradifc,ic comx.eth in his fightXct therefore our c5-
fcience
GodtheRedemer. Lib.2. 147
fcience be cleanc cuen from the moft fecret thoughtes of fwaruinge
from him,if we willhaue our religion to pleafe the Lord. For he re-
x]uircth to haue the glory of his godhead whple & vncprruptcd not
only in outward confe(Iion,but alTo in his eycs^ which do behold the
moft fecrec corners of hearces.
The fecond Commaundement.
Thoujhalt not make to thee any ^auen image,nor any fimllittide
ofthofe thingesthat are in hcauen aboue , or in earth benethy
or in the waters vnderthe earth.Thoufhalt not rvorfhip therfty
norferue them.
As in the firft commaundcmcnt he pronounced that he is the one
God bcGde whom there are no other gods to be deuifcd or had , fo
nowe he more openly dcdareth what manner of God he is5and with
what kindc of worfhip he is to be honored:thac we may not prcfumc
to forge any carnall thing for him.Thc end therfore of this comaun-
dcment is,that he will not haue the lawful worfliip of him,to be pro-
phaned with fuperftitious vlagcs.Wherfore in fummcjhe calleth and
drawcth vs away from the carnall obferuations , which our foobOic
minde is wont to inucnt , when it conceiueth G od according to her
owne grofnefle. And therefore he frameth vs to the lawfull worfliip
of him,that is the fpirituall worfliip, and which is appointed by him.
He fpeaketh of y groffcft fault that is in this ofFenfe, namely outward
idolatry. And there be two partes of this commaundement, The firft
teftraineth our hberty,ihat we do not prefumc to make fubied to our
fenfes or by any forme to rcprcfent God, which is incomprehcnfiblc.
The fecond parte forbtddeth vs to honor any images for religion^
fake. Morccuer he fliorily reciteth all the formes wherewith he was
wont to be exprefled in Hiape, by the prophane and fuperftitious na-
tions. By thofe thingesthat are in heauen, he meaneth the Sunne,ihc
Moone,and other ScarrcSjand paraduenture alfo birdes,as exprc ffing
bis meaning in the fourth of Deuteronomy he meaneth as wel birdes
as ftarres. Which note I would not haue fpokc of but that I faw fomc , _ " '^
vnskilfully to apply it to Angels. Therefore I omit the other partes,
becaufe they arc fufficiently knowen of thcmfelues. And we haue al-
ready in the firft booke taught pUinely enough,that whatfocuer vifi-
blc formes of God man doth inuent, they are diredly conrrary to his
nature, and that therefore fo CooApas images come foorth, true reli-
gion is corrupted and defiled.
1 8 The penall ordinance that followeth ought not a litle to auaile
to {hake of our Houthfulaefle. For he tbreacncth:Thac he is the Lord
T iij.
Cap.8. Of the knowledge of
our God , a itlous God, that viliteth the iniquity of the fathers vpon"
the children vnto the third and fourth generation, in them that natc
his name,and flaewcth mercy vnto thoufandes to them that louc him
and kecpe his commaundementes . This is afmuch in cfFe<ft, as if her
(Iiouldc haue dyd , that it i$ he onely vpon whom we ought to ftickc.
And to bring vs thereunto , he fpeakcth of his power, that dorh not
without puni(hraent fufferit felfe to be contemned or dimmifhcd.
H re IS in deedc ftt the name El,whicb fignifieth God. But becaufc it
is denuc'i of ftrengrhjto cxprefle the fenfe ihc better>I did no: Ihckc
(o ro cranflite u,or to put it into the tcxt.The he calleth himfelfe ic-
lo'js that can abids no fellow. Thirdly he affirmeth that he will be a
reucnger of his maieUy and g,lory if any do i:ransfcr''e ic to creatures
or to grauen images , and that not with a (liortc or fclender reuenge,
buc fuch as (hall cxtcnde to the children and childrens children , tn^
ch'ldrcns childrens children, that is fuch as flialbc followers of their
fatheis vngodlinefle : as alfo he fheweth a pcrpctualll mercy &. bcun-
tjft lines vntolonge continuance of porterity , to ihofc that louc him'
and kecpe his lawe . It is a common manner with God to take vpon
him the perfbne of a husband toward ys. For the coniundion whcr-
with he bindeth himfelfe vnto vs, when he rcceitieth vs into the bo-
fome of his church, is like vnto a certnine holy wedlocke, that muft
ftand by mutuill faithfulnes. As he doth all the ducties of a faithfull
and true husbandjfo againc he rcquireth of vs fuch loue and chaftity
as ought to be in wedlocke, that we ycelde not our foules to Satan,to
luftjind to filthy defires of the flefh,.o be defiled by them. Whereu-
pon he that rebukcth the Apoftafic of the Icwes , complainech that
they did throw away chaftity,& were defiled with adulteries. Thcrc-
forc,as the husband,the more holy and chaft that he himfelfe is, the
more is he kindelecf to anger if he fee his wiues minde enciinc to a
ftragc louerifo the Lord thai hath wedded vs vnto himfelfe in trucih,
tcftifieth thathe hath a moft feructly burning ialoufie,ro oft as ncglc-
ftmg the purencs if his holy manage , we are defiled with wicked lu-
ftes , but fpccially then when we transferrc to any other , or do infed
with any fuperftition the worihippe of his pame , which ought to be
moft vncorruptcd:Forafmuch as by this meanc we do nQt only break
the faith giucn in wedlocke, but alfo do defile the very weddihge bed
with bringing into ir adulterers.
19 In the thretening is to be fcrtrrwhat he mcancth by thiSjWhen
he fayth , that he will vifitc the iniquity of the fathers vpon the chil-
dren vnto the third and murth generation. For,bcfide that ic fiandeth
not with the equity oi Gods luflice, to punifh the innocent for an o>
thtrs
GodtheRcdemcr. Lib.2. 148
tbcrs ofTence.God himfclfe alfo faithjihat he will not make the fonne Eze. i f
to bearc the wickednesofthe father. But this fentcnce is more than *°-
once rcpcatedjof prolonging the punifhmet of the finnes of the aun-
cefters vpon the generations to come. For fo doth Mofes oftentimes Num.14
fpeake vnto him:Lord, Lord, that rendreft the iniquity of the fathers ^'
to the childrcn,vnto the third & fourth gencration.Likewife leremy: j^^.
Thou that (heweft mercy in thoufandcs, thatrenderefttheiniqui- ,j/
ty of the fathers into the bofome of the children after them. Many,
while they trauaile much in lofinge this knot , thinke that it is to be
vnderflanded oncly of temporall punifhmentes, which if the children
fuffer for the parentes faultes,it is no abfurdity/orafmuch as they arc
oftentimes layed vpon them for their faluation, which is in dede true
For Efay declared to E2echias,that hisfonnes fliould be fpoiled of the
kingdom,& cariedinto exile for y finne that he had committed. The ^'^ J^*
houfes of Pharao & Abimclech were plaged for offending Abraham, Q^tui t.
But when that isalleag^dforairojiingcofthisqueftion, it is rather a 17.3^20
fhift than a true expofition. For here & in hke places he threatneth a }•
more greuous reuengc tha thatit may be limited within the bounds
of this prefent hfe.It is therefore thus to be taken : that the iuft curfe
of the Lord, hcth not only vpon the head of the wicked ma himfelfe,
but alfo vpon his whole family : whc the curfe once lieth vpon them,
what is cKe to be looked for,but that the father being deftitute of the
fpirit of Godjhue moft wickedly , and the fonne Iikewife forfaken of
rfie Lord for the fathers fault, do follow the fame way ofdeftrudion:
& nnally,the childes chiid,& the childc of the childes childe,thc cur-
fed Ceedc of detcftable men do fall headlong after them ?
20 Firft let vs ree,whcther fuch reuegc be vnfcmcly for the iuflicc
of God, If all the nature of man be danable,we know that deftrudion
is prepared for them,to whom the lord vouchfaucth not to commu-
nicate his grace,Neuerthelesthey do perifl^ by their own vnrightcour
ncflfc, ¬ by vnrighteous hatred of God. Neither is there left any
caufc to quarcll,why they be not holpen by y grace of God to falua-
tion as other are. Wheras therfore this punifhmet is laid vpon wicked
me & euil doers for their oftenfes,that their houfes be depriucd of the
grace of God during many generations: who can accufc God for this
moftiuft reuenge?But y Lord on y other fide pronounceth,that y pu-
nifhmet of y fathers finnc (hal not pafle ouer vnto yfonne.Note what
is there entreated of. When the Ifraelitcs had bin long & continually E«.it,
vexed w many caiamities.they began to vfe for a Prouerbe,that their 10.
fathers had cate a fower grape, wherwith the childrens teeth were fee
on edge; whereby they meant (hat cheir fathers had comited tinncs,
T iiij.
Cap. 8. Of the knowledge of
whereof they ; being otherwife righteous , and not deferufng it, did
fufFer the puni{hment,rather by the vnappeafcable wrathfulncfTe of ,
Godjthan by a moderate feuerity. The Prophet pronounceth vnta
the <f it is not fo : beeaufe rhcy are puniQicd for their ownc offenfcs,
& that it ftandeth not with the iuftice of God,y the righteous fonne
fhoulde fufFer punifliment for the naughtinefle of the wicked father.
Which thing alfo is not contained in this prefent ordinance. For if y
Vititingjwherof mention is now made,be fulhlled when the lord ta-
kcth away from the houfc of the wicked his grace , the bght of his
trueth and other helps of faluation:in this that the children beingc
blinded & forfakcn of him,do go on in the fteps of their fathers,they
fufteine curfes for their fathers offenfcs . Butinafmuch asthcy arc
put to temporall miferies,& at laft to eternal deftrudionjherein they
are puniflied by the luft iudgement of God,not for y finncs of other,
but for their ownc iniquity.
21 On the other fide is offered a promifc of enlarging the mercy
of God into a thoufand gcnerati6s,which promife is alfo often found
> in the Scripture$,& is fct in y folemne couenant of the church;! wd
be thy God,and of thy fcede after thee. Which thing Salomon ha-
'ro.ao. uing refped vnto,wry teth that y childre of the righteous (halbe blef-
fed after their death not only by reafo of holy bringing vp, which al-
io not a btle auaileth ihcruntOjbut aUo for y bleffing promifcd m the
coucnat,that the grace of God ihall reft eternally in the houfes of the
godly.Hcreupo groweth great cofort to rhe faithfiill,great terrour to
the wickcd.For if euen after death,the remembrance both of righte-
oufnes & wickednefTe be of fo great force with God,that the curfing
of the one, and the bleffingc of the other redoundeth vnto pofterity,
much more fhal it light & reft vpon the heads of the doers thefelues.
But it makeih nothinge againit vs, that the ifTuc of the wicked many
times Cometh to good proufe,& y ifTue of the faithful! fwarueth out
of kinderbecaufethe lawmaker meant not here to ftablifh fuch a per-
petuall rule as (hould derogate his free eledi5. For it fufBceth for the
comforte of the righteous and for the terrour of the (inner , that the
penalty is not vaine or of no effed , although it do not alway take
place.For as the temporall punifhmentes that are laycd vpo n a fewc
wicked men,are tcftimonies of the wrath of God againft finnes, and
of the iudgement that fhal one day be giue vpon all finners,although
many cfcape vnpuniflicd euen to the ende of their lifc:fo when God
giuethone example of this blclling to (hew mercy & bountifulneflc
to the fonnc for the fathers fake,he giueth a proufe of his coftant &
perpetuall fauour to them that worfbip iiim:aad when he once pur-
fueth
GodthcRedemer. Lib.2, 149
fucth the wickednefle of the father in the fonne , he (hewctli what
iudgcmcnt is prepared for all the reprobate for their ownc oHTenccs.
Which afluredncfle he had in this place principally tcfipcd vnto. An4
by the way he commendcth vnto vs the largeneflc of his mcrcie,
which he extendeth vnto a thoufand gcnerations,whcras he afligne<l
but onely fowcr generations to vengeance.
The third Commaundement.
Thou [halt notta^ the name of the Lord thy God in va'me.
The cnde of this commaundement is , that his will is to haue the
maiefty of his name to be holy amog vs.Therfore the fumme fiialbe,
that we do not defile it with cotempteoufly and irreuerently vfing it.
With which prohibition the commaundement hangeth orderly to-
gether, that we take ftudie and care godhly to reucrencc it. Therforc
we ought fo to order ourfelucs both in our mindesand our tonges,
that we neither thinke nor fpeake any thing of God himfclfc or hit
mifteries , but rcuerently and wirh much fobrietie : that in weying his
workcs , we conceiue nothing but honorable towarde him . Thefe
three thinges I fayjit behoueth vs not ne^^ligently to markc,that what
(beuer our minde conceiueth of him , what foeuer our tons: vttercth,
it may fauour of his exccllencie , and may agree with the holy high-
neffe of his nametand finally may ferue to aduaunce his magnificccc.
That we do not rafhly or difordcrly abufc his holy word and reucred
mifteries either to ambition , or to coueteoufnelTe , or to our owne
triflinges ; but that as they beare thedignitic of his name emprintcd
in them , fo they may kecpe their honour and cftimation among vs*
Laft of all, that we do not carp againft or fpeake cuill of his workes,
as thefe wretched men are wont to babble reprociiefully againft the:
but that what foeuer we rehearfe done by him, wereporte it with
wordes of praifeof his wifedome/ighteoufnefTe & goodneffe. That
is to (andific the name of God. Where otherwife is done,!! is defiled
with vaine and peruerfc abufe,byc3ufe it is violently carried from the
right vie wherunto onely it was apointed : and though there be no
other hurt donCjyet it is fpoiled of his dignicie, and by little and Uttlc
brought to contempt. Now,if there be fo much eujl in this ra(h readi-
nefle to v(c the name of God out of feaibn , much more mifchiefc is
in this.if it be employed to euill vfes, as they do that make it to ferue
the fuperftitions of Necromancic, cruell execrations,vnlawfull con-
iurations, and other wicked enchauntcmentcs. But fwcaring is chiefly
mendoncd in the commaundement^s the thing wherin the peruerle
abufe of Gods name is moft deceftable , that thereby we may be the
Cap. 8. Of the knowledge of
bcccer altogether &ayed away from all defiling thereof. Due that here
is commaundenient geuen of the worihip ot God , and of the reue«
rcnce of his namc^and not of the truthe and equitie chat is to be kept
among men,3ppeareth by that that he afcerwarde in the fecond tabic
condemncth pcriurie and falfe witnelTe* whereby hurte is done to the
fcUowfiiip oi roen:but it were in vaine to repetc it againe^if this com-
, mnundcment entreated of the ducie of charirie. And alfo the diuilion
of the lawe it felfc lequiteth it , bycaufe as it is faid , God did not in
vaine apoince two cables for his lawe , whereby is gathered that in
this commaundement he chalengeth his owne right to himfillfe, and
defendeth the holynefle oi his name ^ and tcacheth not what men
owe to men.
zj Firft is to be learned what is an othe . It is a taking of God to
witnefle , to confirme the truthe of that which we fpeake . For thofe
curfcd fpeachcs that conteine manifcft reproches againft God, arc
vnworthy to be rcckcned among othes.TIi^t fuch taking to witnefle,
whan it is rightly done, is a Linde of wodhipping of God , is flic wed
4* t9. *" diuerfe places of the Scripture. As v/iKn lifaie proph.cieth of the
calhngof the Aflyrians and Egyptians into fcllowiiiip of the couc-
naunr with Ifracl, They fhall fpeake (faith he) in the tongue of Cha-
naan,and (hall fwcre in the name of the Lof de.That is to fay,in fwe-
ring by the name of the Lorde,chey Ihall yelde a confcffion of his re-
ligion. Againe when hefpeaketh of the enlargcmerof his kingdome,
- ^ he faith : Whofoeuer ihall blefle himfelfe , fhail blefle in the God of
j^* the faithfuU:and he that (hall fwerc in the lande,fliail [were in chc true
God. Hiercmie faith , If they fiiall teaclie the people to f.vere in my
4^ * ' name as they haue taught them to fwerc by Baal , they fhalbe builded
vp in the middes of my houfe . And for good caufe it is faidc , that
when we call vpon the name of the Lorde to witneflc, we do witncflc
our religion towarde him . For fo we confefTe chat he is the etcrnall
and vnchaungeable truthe, whome we call vpon, not oncly as a jnolt
fubftantiall witnefTc of truth aboue all other^but alfo as the onely dc-
fenfe thereof, which is able to bring forth hidden thinges into light,
and then as the knower of hcartcs . For where teftimonies of men
do faile,there we flee to God for witnclfc , fpecially where any thing
is to be proue<l that lieth fecrctc in confcicncc , For which caufe the
Lorde is bitterly angry with them that fwcare by ftrange gods,and he
iudgeth that maner of fwcarihg to be an argumetof manifeft falling
from his allegcance : Thy fonncs haue forfaken mejand do fweare by
tte.i'7 jj^g^ jj^gj 3fg j^Q gQjjj^ y^nd he dcdareththc haynoufncfle of this of»
oph I ^^^^^ ^y threatening of puniflimenc il will deftroy them that fwcare
GodthcRedemer. Lib.2. 150
Ey the name of chc Lorcic , and fwcare by Melchan.
14 Nowe when we vnderftand that it is the Lordes will that there
be in our oches a worfhip of his name : fo much the more dihgcnt
hede is to be t3ken,that in ftcde of worfhipping they do not conceine
diflionour,contcmpc or abacemeht of it. For it is no fmall di (honour,
when periuric is committed in fwcaring by him , wherefore it is called
in the !a\ve. Profanation . For what is left to the Lorde when he is Leui
(polled of his truth ? he fliall then ccafle to be God . But truely Ife is * *•
fpoiled therof, when he is made an affirmer and approuer of fallhod.
Wherefore, when loTua minded to driue Achan to confcfle the tiuth, lofu
he Liid;My Sonuejgeue glorie to the Lorde of Iffaell,meaning there- ** •
by, thnc the Lorde is greuoufly diflionored if a man fweare falfeiy by
him. And no maruall. For we do as much as in vs liethjin a mancr, to
ftr.iiv^ hi'j holy name with alie . And that this manner of fpeech was
vied ?Tnong the lewes fo oft as any was called to take an othe,appea-
rcth by the like proieftation ,that the Pharifces vfe in the Gofpeil of ^"^<
lohri. To this hee'iefu'nefle the formes of oihes that are vfcd in the ft
ScrJpmrcs do inftrud vs;Thc Lord lyueth,The Lord do thefe thmges ,*^.
vnto me , and addc thefe thinges, The Lorde be witneflc vpon my x Re
Ibu'e. Which do proue, that we can not call God for witneffc of our J • •
fayinges, but that we alfo wifne him to take vengeance of our periu- "" '
rie, if we fpeake decciptfully.
If The name of the Lorde is made vile and common , when it i$
vfed in fupetfluous othcs , although they be true. For in fuch cafe it is
alfo taken in vaioe.Wherforc it fhal not be lufFicient to abfteine from
fwearing falfely , vnlcfTe we do alfo remember , that fwearing was fuf-
fredand ordcined not for lufte or pkaAire , but for necefTiries fake;
and therefore they go beyond the lawfull vfe thereof, that applic it to
thing's not necclTarie . And there can no other neceffitie be preten-
ded , but where it is to feme either religion or charitieiwherin at this
day men do to much hcentioufly otfcnde , and fo much the more in-
tolcrabhe, for that by very cuftome it hath ccflcd to berecknedfor
any offcnfe at all, which yet before the iudf^ement feate of God is not
{lenderfy wcycd. For euery where without regard , the name of God
is defiled in trifling talkes , and it is not thought that ihey do euilljby-
caufe by long fuffred and vnpuni(hcd boldencffejthey are come to reft
as It were in pofltflion o( fo great wickednetfe.But the comraaunde-
ment of the Lord remaineth in force,the penaltie abideth in ftrength,
and Ihall one day haue his effedt , whereby there is a certaine &eciall
leuenge proclaimed againft them that vfe his name in vainc .] This
commaundcmem is alfo tranlgicllcd in an other point , that m our
Cap.8. Of the Icnovvlcdge of
oibeswe put the holy feruames of God in the place of God, witTi
manifeft vngodlynefle , for fo v?e iranffer the gloric of his godhead
ent.6. io them. Neither is it without caufe, that the Lorde hath gcuen fpq-
i. and ciali comir.aundement to fwere by his name, and by fpeciall prohibit
> Y* tion forbidden, that wefhouldenot be heard fwere by any ftrange
^lu S°^^- Andthe Apoftlecuidentlyteftifieththc fame, when he wri-
rcth , that men in (wearing do call vpon a hicr than thcmfeiues, and
tha^God which had none greater than his ovvne glorie to fwere by,
did fwere by himfelfe.
16 The Anabaptiftes not contented with this moderati6 of fwci*
ring,dodeteftallothcs without exception, bycaufethe prohibition
att. 5. of Chrift is generall: I fay vnto ye, (were not at all , but let your talkc
^S' be yea yea, and nay nay, what fo euer is more than this,is of euill. But
by thismeane,they do without confideration ftumblc againft Chrift:
while they make him aduerfaric to his father , and as if he had come
downe from heaucn to repeale his fathers decrees . For the cternall
' God doth m the lawe not onely permit fwearing as a thing lawfull,
hn.7. which were enough : but alfoinneceffitiedothcommaundeit. But
^ Chrift affirmcth that he is all one with his father? that he bringeth no
other thing, but that which his father commaundcdhim, thathij
dodrme is not of himfelfe,&c.What then ? will they make God con-
trarie to himfelfe, which Ihall afterwarde forbidde and condcmne the
(ame thing in mens behauiours , whichehe hath before allowed by
comaunding it ? But bycaufe there is fome difficultie in the wordes of
Chrift, let vs a httle weye them. But herein we ftiall neuer atteine the
truth, vnlefle we bende our eyes vnto t!ic cntent of Chrift, and take
hccdc vnto the purpofe that he there goeth about. His purpofe is not
cither to releafe or reftreigne the lawe , but to reduce it to the true
and natur;?ll vnderihnding , whiche had bene very muche depraued
by the falfe glofes of the Scribes and Pharifees . This if we holde ia
miiide , we ftiali not thinke than Chrift did vtterly condcmne othes,
but only thofc othes which do tranfgrefle the rule of the lawe.There-
by it appeal cthjthat the people at that time did forbearc no maner of
fwearing but perjuries, wheras the lawe doth not onely forbidde per-
iuries, but alfo all idle and fuperfluous othes.The Lord therefore the
''^'* moft fure cxpofitour of the lawe, doth admonifhthem, that it is not
onely euill to forfwcare , but alfo to fweare . But how to fwearc ? in
vainc. But as for thef« othes that are commended in the lawe, he
Icaueth them fafe and at libcrtie. They ferae to fight fomcwhat more
ftrongiy when they take carneft holde of this worde At all, which yet
is not referred to the worde Sweare , but to the formes of fwearmg
(hac
GodtheRedemcr. Lib.2. 151
tfiat arc after rehcarfed . For this was alfo parte of their crrour, that
when they did fwearc by heaucn and earth , they thought that they
did not touch the name of God. Therefore after the principall kindc
of offe!)fe againft this commaundement , the Lorde doth alfo cut of
from them all bycfhiftcs,that they fhoulde not thinke that they hauc
cfcapedj if not fpcaking of the name of God ihey callhcauen and
earth to witncffe , For here by the way it is alfo to be noted, that al-
though the name of God be not expreffedjyetme by indireft formes
do fweare by him , as if they fwearc by the liuely light , by tht bread
tl\at they cate,by their Baptifme, or other tokens of Gods liberalitie
toward them. Neither doth Chrift in that place where he forbiddcth
them to fweare by heauen and earth and Hierufalcm,fpeake it to cor«
red fuperftition, as fomc men falfely thinke, but he rather confutctU
their fophifticall futteltic , which thought it no faulte babblingiy to
throwe out indited othes, as though they fpared the holy name of
God, which is engrauen in all his benefites. But otherwife it is, where
either a mortall man , or a dead man , or an Angell is put in the place
of God:as among the prophane nations flatterie dcuifed that ftinking
forme of fwearing by the life or foule of the King : for then the falfc
making of Gods doth obfcure and minifh the gloric of the one onely
God. But when we meane only , to procure credit to our fayingcs by
the holy name of God , although the fame be indireftly done , yet in
all fuch trifling othes his maicftie is offended.Chrift taketh from this
liccntioufnefle , all pretenfe of excufe , in this that he forbiddcth to
fweare at all . And lames tcndeth to the fame purpofe , reciting the j^,^ .
fame wordes of Chrift which I haue before alleged,bycaufc that (ame i »,
raih boldenefle hath alway bene in the worlde , which is a prophane
mifufe of the name of God. For if ye referrc this wordc, At alljto the
fubftance , as if without any exception it were altogether vnlawfull to
fweare : wherefore ferueth that expofition which is added afterward:
Neither by heauen nor by earth, &c?Wherby itfufficiently appcrcth
tharthofe cauillations are met withal] , by which the Icwes thought
their faulte to be excufed.
27 Therefore it can not nowe be doubtefull to (bunde iudgc-
mcntes, that the Lorde io that place did onely reproue thofe othes
that were forbidden by the lawe . For he himfelfe which (hewed in
his life an examplar of the perfection that he taught , did not ftickc to
fweare when occafion required. And his difciples , who ( we doubte
not ) did obey their maifter in all thinges , followed the fame exam-
ple: who dare fay that Poulc woulde haue fwornc , if fwearing had
ben vtterly forbidden?but when matter fo re<]uired>he fware without
Cap.8. Of the knowledge of
any Iticking at it , yea fomctime adding an execration , But this que-
fiionis not yet ended, bycaufefomG duthinke that onelypublike
oches are excepted out of this prohibitio, asthofe orhes that we take
when the MagiQrate doth oB^er them to vs and require thetn of vs.
And fuch as Princes vfe to cake in ftabhfliing of leagiies,or the people
when they fweare allegeance to their Prince , or the Soldiar when he
is put to an othc for his true feruice in the warrc , and fuch hke . And
to this forte they adioyne , and that rightfully , fuch othes , as are in
Paule to conHrme the dignitie of the Oofpcll , for afmuch as the A-
poftles in their office arc not priuatc men but publicke minifters of
God. And truely I denie not that thofe arc the fafcit othes y bycaufc
they arc defended with foundeft tcftimonies of Scripture . The ma-
giftratc is commaundcd in a doubtcfull cafe to driue the witneiTc to
an othc , and he on jihe other fide to aunfwcre by othc:and the Apo-
ftle faith , that mens controucrfies are by this meane ended . In this
comaundement bothe thcfe baue a perfed aUowartce of their offices.
Yea and we may note,that among the oWe heathen mcn,the publikc
and folemne othe was had in great reuerenc€,hut common othes that
were vfually fpoken without confidcration , were cither nothing or
very little regarded , bycaufe they thought that in thefe they had noc
to do with the maicftie of God at all.But ycc it were to much daungc-
rous to condemne priuate othes , that are in neceflarie cafes fobcrly,
holily , and rcucrertrly taken , which are maintcined both by reafon
and examples. For if it belawefull for priuate menina weighty and
carneft matter to appelc to God as iudge bctwene ihem, much mere
is it lawefuU to call him to witnefTe. Put the cafe : thy brother will ac-
cufe thee of falfc breachc of faith, thou cndeuoreft to purge thy fclfc
according to the dutie ofcharitie, and he by no meancs willfuffcr
himfclfe to be fanfficd. If thy good name come in perill by his ob-
ftiuate malicioufneflcjthou (halt without offenfe appcle to the iudge-
ment of God,that it will pleafe him in time to make thine innocency
knowen. Now if the weight of the wordes be confidcred, it is a leflc
matter to call him to wirnclfe , Therefore I fee not why in this cafe
we fhoulde affirmc, that the calling him to witnefTe is vnlawfull. And
we arc not without many examples thereof. For though the othe of
Abraham and Ifaac with Abimclcch be faid not to ferue for our pur*
J4. and pofcjbycaufe it was made in the name of a pubhke companic,yct la-
atf. ?»• cob and Laban were priuate men, which ftabhrtied a couenaunt with
and J ^' mutual! othe bctwene them felues. Booz wasapriu.iteman, which
Ruth h ^y ^^^ ^^^^ meane cofirmed his promifc of mariagc to Ruth.Abdias
I J , ' * was a priuate man , a iuil man and fearing God , which affirmed vnro
£Iias
God the Rcdemcr. Lib,2 . 152
HIiasljy othc, the thing that he meant to pcrfuadc him. Therefore «.Rr*»S»
I haue no better rule , but that othcs be Co tempered , that they be '**'
rot vnaduifed , that they be not common without regard , that they
be not vfed of raging lulte , nor trifling , but that they ferue lufte nc-
ccffitie, ns where the Lordcs glorie is to be mainteincd , or the edifi-
cation of our brother furthered, to whichecnde the commaundc-
tnent of the la we tendeth.
The fourth Commaundcment*
"^member thai thou ^cpe holy the Sabbat day . Six dayesfhak
thou Tvcrl{c and do all thy voorkes. "But on the feuenth day is tht
Sabbat of the Lord thy God.In it thou /halt do no work^.&c,
18 The ende of this commaundcment is , that we being dead to
our owne affcdions and workes , fhouldc be bu(ied in meditation of
the kingdoms of God, and to the fame meditation Oiouldc be excr-
cifedjby fuch meanes as he hath ordeined. But bycaufe this comaun-
dement hath a pecuUar and fcuerall confideratio from the reft,thcrc-
fore it muft haue alfo a feuerali manner of cxpolition. The olde wri«
ters vfe tocallita {hadowifhcommaundcmcnt,forthatitconteineth
the outward obferuatio of the day,which by the commingof Chrift
was taken away with the other figures. Whcrin I graut they (ay truc-
ly , but they touch but halfe the matter. Wherefore we muft fetch
the expofition of it farther of. And (as I thinke) I haue marked that
there are three caufes to be confidercd, wherupon this commaundc-
ment confifteth. For fii ft the hcaucnly lawemaker meant vnder the
reft of the feuenth day,to fet out in figure to the people of Ifraeil the
fpirituall reft, whereby the faithful! ought to celTe from their owne
workes , that they might fuffcr God to worke in them . Secondarily,
his will was to haue one apointed day,wherinthcy ftnoulde meete to-
gether to hearc the lawj& execute the ceremonies, or atleaft beftow
it peculiarly to the meditation of his workes.: that by fuch calling
to remembrance,they might be exercifed to godlineffe. Thirdly, he
thought good to haue a day of reft graunted to fcruauntes , and fuch
as lined vnder the gouernement of other , wherein they might hau^
fome ceding from their labour.
29 But we are many waies taught, that the fame (hadowing of the
fpirituall reft, was the principall point in the Sabbat . For the Lordc
required the keping of no commaundemf nt in a maner more (euerc- J^um,! j
ly, than this : when his meanmc is in the Prophetes to declare that all z,^
rcligio is ouerthrowen,the he complaineth that his Sabbates arc pol- ^ij^^a'^^
luted,defiled| not kept, not ranctified:as though that peece of feruicc 3 j.'^ $.
Cap,8. Of the knowledge of
Iere.17. being omittcd,therc remained no more wherein he might be'hono-
jj». and j.^^ Hg jjj Cgt fQj^Yi the obferuing thereof with hie praifes . For
EX0.J1. whichecaufe the faithful! did among other oracles marueloufely
1 5. and eftceme the reueling of the Sabbat. For in Nehemiah thus ipakc
J S'» . the Leuites in a folemne conuocation,Thou haft (hewed to our fa-
Mehe.^ thers thy holy Sabbat,and haft geuen them the commaundementes
* '♦• and the ceremonies,and the lawe by the hande of Mofes . You fee
how it is had in fingular eftimation among all the commaundemetes
of the lawe . All which thiiiges do feme to fet forth the dignitie of
the mifterie , whiche is very well expreffed by Mofes and Ezechiel.
Thus you haue in Exodus. See that ye kepe my Sabbat day, bycaufe
it is a token betwene me and you in your generations : that you may
Icnowe that I am the Lord that fandifie you : kepe my Sabbat , for it '
is holy vnto you.Let the children of Ifraell kepe the Sabbat and ce-
lebrate it in their generations, it is an euerlafting couenant betwene
me and rhe children of Ifraell, and a perpetuall token. Yet Exechiel
lie.io. fpcaketh more at large. But the fumme thcrofcometh to this cffed,
that it is for a token whereby Ifraell ihoulde knowe that God is their
fanftifier . If our fandiHcation be the mortifiyng of our owne will,
then appearcth a moft apte relation of the outwarde figne with the
inward thing it fclfe : we muft altogether reft, that God may woike in
vs:wc muft depart from our owne will, we muft refignc vp our heart, .
tJcbr. ? ^^ "^"^ banifh all luftes of the flefh . Finally , we muft ceffc from all
I J. and the doingesofour owne wit, that we may haue God working in vs,
^^. that we may refte in him,as the Apoftlc alfo teacheth.
^o This perpetuall cefting was rcprefcntedto the Icwes,by the
teping of one day among feucn : which day, to make it be obferued
with greater deuotionjthe Lord commaundpd with his owne exam-
ple. For itauaileth not a litle to ftiire vp mans endeuour,tkat he may
knowe that he tendeth to the following of his Creator. If any man
fearch for a fecret fignification in the number of feuen : For afmuch
as that number is in the Scripture the number of perfedion , it was
not without caufe chofen to fignifie euerlafting continuancc.Wher-
-with this alfo agreeth that Mofes in the day that he declared that
the Lord did reft from his workeSjmaketh an ende of defcribing the
fucced:ug of dayes and nightes.T here may be alfo brought an other
probable note of the numberjthat the Lord thereby meant to ftiew
that the Sabbat fhoulde neuer be pcrfedly ended , till it came to the
laft day .For in it we beginne our blcfled rcft,in it we do dayly procede
'f 6i ^" profiting more and more . But bycaufe we haue ftill a continuall
\,' ' warrc with the flcfti , it ftiali not be ended vntill that faying of Efaic
be
God the Redcmcr, Lib.2. 153
be fulfilled, concerning the continuing of neweMoone withnev/c
Mocne,of Sabbat with Sabbat, euen then when God flialbc all in all. /. Cor
It may fccme therfore that the Lord hath by the feuenih day fct forth '^•**"
to his people the perfeftion to come of his Sabbat at the lafte day,
that our whole life might by continuall meditation of the Sabbat , a-
ipirc to this petfedion.
g I If any man miflike this obferuation ofthe number as a matter
to curious,! am not againft him, but that he may more (imply tnke it:
that the Lorde ordeined one certainc day , wherein his people might
vnder the fcholing of the lawe be cxercifcd to the ronnnuall medi-
tation of the fpirituall refte ; And that he afligncd the feuenth day,
cither bycaufe he thought it fufficiet,or that by (etting forth the like-
ncde of his owne example , he might the better mouc the people to
kcepeit: oratleaft toputthem in minde, that the Sabbat tended
to no other cndc,but that they fliould become like vnto their Crca-
tour.For it maketh fmall matter, fo that the mifterie remainc which is
therein principally fet forth,concerning the perpetual red of our wor-
kcs-To confidcration whereof the Prophctcs did now and then call
backe the lewcSjthac they fhould not thinke them felucs difcharged
by carnall takingof their reft. Bcfide the places already alieagcd, you
haue thus in Efay : If thou turne away thy footc from the Sabbat, that Hfa. jS
thou doe not thine owne will in my holy day , and fhalt call the Sab- ' 3»
bat delicate and holy of the glorious Lordc , and flialt glorifie him
while thou doeft not thine owne waycs, and fcekeft not thine owne
will to fpeake the wordjthe (halt thou be dehted in yLord,&c.But it is
no doubtjthat by the comming of our Lorde Chrift, fo much as was
cercmoniallherein,was abrogate . For he is the truth,by whofe prc-
fence all figures doe vanifli away: he is the body at fight whereof the
fhadowes are left.HCjI fay,is the true fulfilling ofthe Sabbat, we being
fcuried with him by Baptifme , arc graflped into the fellowfhip of his r^^ ^
death , that we being made partakers of the rcfurredion, we may *},
walkeinncwneflcof life. Therefore in an other place the Apoftlc
writcth , that the Sabbat was a fhadow of a thing to come ; and that
the true body,that is to fay,the perfed fubftancc of truth is in Chnft, Cola,
which in the fame place he hath well declared. That is not contained *^** *'
in one day , but in the whole courfe of our life, vntill that we being
vtterly dead to our felues, be filled with the life of God . Therefore
fupcrftitious obfcruiog of dayes ought to be farrc from Chriftians.
J 2 But for afinuch as the two later caufes ought not to be reckc-
ncd among the olde fhadowes,but doe belong a like to all ages : fince
the Sabbat is abrogatc,yct this hath Mi place with vs, that we fhouW
V
Cap.8. Of the knowledge of
meete at appoynted dayes to the hearing of the word, to the tfca-
king of the mifticall bread, and to pubUke prayer; and then , that to
feruauntes and laborers be graunted their reft from their labour. It is
out of doubt that ih commaunding the Sabbat the Lordc had care of
both thefc thinges.The firft of them hath fufficicntteftimonie by the
only vfe of the lewes to proue it.The fccond,Mofes fpakc of in Deu-
teronomie in thcfe wordes : that thy man feruaunt and thy mayde
feruaunt may reft as well as thou : remember that thou thy felfe didft
ferue in Egypt. Againe in Exodus; that thy Oxeandthy Aflcmay
reft,and the fonne ofthy bondwoman may take breath. Who can de-
ny that both thcfe thinges doe ferue for vs as well as for the lewes?
Meetings at the Church , are commaunded vs by the word of God,
and the neceffitie of them is fufficicntly knowen in the very experi-
ence of life. VnlefTe they be certainly appoynted and haue their ordi-
narie dayes,how can they be kept? All thinges by the fentence of the
Apoftie are to be done comly and in order among vs. But fo farre is it
of, that comlmeflfe and order can be kept without thispolicie and
moderation , that there is at hand prefent trouble and ruine of the
Church,if it be diflblued.Now if the fame neceffitie be among vs,for
releefc whereof the Lord appointed the Sabbat to the lewes: let no
man fay that it belongeth nothing vnto vs . For our moft prouidenc
and tender Father , willed no lefle to prouidc for our neceffitie than
for the lewes. But thou wilt fay , why doe we not rather daily meetc
to£;ither,that the difference of dayes may be taken away ? I would to
God , that were graunted, and truely fpirituall wifedome was a thing
worthy to haue daily a pccce of the time cut out for it . But if it can
not be obtained of the weakenefTe of many to haue daily meetings,
and the rule of charitie doth not fufFer vs to exact more of them,why
fliould we not obey the order which we fee layed vpon vs by the will
of God.
^ ^ I am compelled here to be fomewhat long, becaufe at this day
many vnquiet fpirites doe raife trouble,conceming the Sunday .They
crie out that the Chriftian people are nouriflied in lewifhnelTe , be-
caufe they kecpefomeobferuation of dayes. Butlanfwerc, thatwt
kccpe thofe dayes without any lewifhnelTcbecaufc we doe in this bc-
halfe farre differ from the lewes.For we kecpe it not with ftreight rc-
li8;ion as a ceremonie, wherein we thinke a fpirituall mifterie to be fi-
gured,but we retaine it as a necelTary rcmedie to the keeping of order
in the Church. But Pauleteacheth that in keeping thereof they arc
not to be iudged Chriftians,becaufe it is a ihadowof a thing to come.
Therefore he feared that he had laboured in vainc among the Gala-
thiansy
God the Rcdcmcr. Lib.2. 154
fhiansi becaufe they didftill obferue dayes . And to the Romanes he Rom. i
affirmeth that it is ("uperftition if any man doe make difference be- 5»
twene day and day. But whojfauing thefe maddc men onely doth not
lce,of what obferuing the Apoftle meancth ? For they had no regarJe
to this pohticall ende and the order of the Church, but whereas they
kept them ftill as {hadowes of fpiritual thinges,they did eucn fo much
darken the glory of Chrifl and the hght of the Gofpell.Thcy did not
therefore ccafe from handy vvorkes, becaufe they were thingcs that
did call them away from holy ftudies and meditations, but for a ccr-
taine religion, that in ceafing from worke they did dreamc that they
ftill kept their mifteries of olde time deliuercd them . The Apoftle , I
fay, inueyethagainft this difordered diflcrcnce of dayes, and not a-
gainft the iawefullchoife of dayes that fcrueth for the quietnefleof
Chriftian fellowfliip , for in the Churches that he him felfe did or-
dainCjthe Sabbat was kept to this vfc . For he appointeth the Corin- **^**^'«
thians the fame day, wherein they Ihould gather the coUcdion to re-
leeuc the brethren atlcrufale.If they fcare fuperftitiojthere was niorc
daunger thereof in the feaft dayes of the lewes, thnnin the Sundayes
that the Chriftians now haue. For, fo as was expedient for the ouer-
throwing of fuperftition, the day that the Icwcs rcUgioufly obferued
is taken away : and,fo as was necclfary for keeping of comlincfle , or-
der , and quiet in the Church , an other day was appoynted for the
Tame vfe.
g4 Albeit the old fathers haue not without reafbn of their choife,
put in place of the Sabbat day the day that we cal Sunday.For wher-
as in the Refurredion of the Lordc is the ende and fulfilling of that
reftjwhereof the olde Sabbat was a fhadow: the Chriftians are by the
very fame day that made an ende of HiadoweSjput in minde that they
fhould no longer ftickc vnto the fhadowiih ceremonie. But yet I doe
not fo reft vpon the number of feuen.that I would bindc the church
to the bondage thereof , Neither will I condemne thofe Churches*
that haue other folemne dayes for their meetings, fothat they be
without fuperftition.which (hall be, if they be onely applyedtothc
obferuation of Difcipline and well appoynted order . Let the fumme
hereof be this : as the truth was gcuen to the lewes vnder a figurcfo
is it deliuered vs without any fhadowes at all. Firft that in all our life
long we fhould be in meditation of a continuall Sabbat or reft from
our ownc workes, that the Lord may worke in vs by his fpiritc : then
that euery man priuately fo oft as he hath leafure , fhould diligently Hift.
cxcrcife mm felfe in godly calling to minde the workes of God » and tripJib
alfoc hat we all (hould keepi: the lawfull order of the Church appoyn- ****^*
V ii.
Cap,8.^^ Of the knowledge of
ted,for the nearing of the worde, for the miniltration of the Sacra-
ments and for pubhke prayer: thirdly that we fhould not vngently
opprcfTe them that be vnder vs. And fo doe the trifelinges of the fallc
prophets vaniihaway thatinthe ages paflhauc infeded the people
with a levvifli opinion, that fo much as was ceremoniall in this com*
maundement is taken away , which they in their tongue cnll the ap-
pointing of the feuenth day, but that Co much as ismorall remnineth,
which is the keeping of one day in the weekc. But that is nothing elfc
in efte*5i,than for reproch of the lewes to chaunge the day, & to kcpc
ftill the fame holinefTe in their mindc . For there ftill rcmaineth with
vs the Hke fignification of myflcrie in the day^s as was among the
Tewes.Andtruely wc fee what good they hauedone by fuchdoflHne.
For they that cleauc to their conftitutions , doe by thefe as much as
excecde the lewes in grolTe and carnallfuperftition of Sabbat.-fo that
^ *y ^ :he rebuhings that are read in Efay, doc no Icflfe fitly ferue for them at
' ^ ^*^ thefe daycSjthan for thofe that the Prophet reproucd in his time. But
this generall dodrine is principally to be kept , that left religion
(hould fall away or waxc faint among vs,holy meetings arc to he dili-
gently kept,and thofe outward helpcs are to be vfed that arc profita-
ble for to nourifh ihe worlhipping of God.
The fife Commaundcmcnr.
Honour thy Tather and thy Mother y that thou maift I'ue ton^
ypon the Land which the Lord thy God (hail gene thee,
5 5 The ende of this commaundement \s^ that becaufe the Lor<Jc
dcl-tethinihcpreferuarionof hi"5order, therefore he willeth that
thofe degrees of preeminence which he hath ordained be not bro-
kcn,thc fumme therefore (hall be that we rcuercnce thofe whom the
Lord hath fet ouer v$ , ihit we ycld to them honour, obedience and
t thankcfulncffe.Whereupon follows th that it is forbidden vs, to with-
draw any thing from their dignitie,cither by contcmpror obftinacic
or vnthankefulnes . For fo doth the word Honour, in the Scnpfurc
.Tim. fignifie very largely: as when the Apoftlc fayeth, that the elders
y. v^^hich rule well are worthy of double honour,he meanetli not oncly
that rcuercnce is due vnto them,but alfo fuch recompcnfe as their
miniilei ie defcrueth. And becaufe this commaundmient of fubiedi -
on, doth moft of all difagree with the perucrfenefle of mans nature,
which ns it fwelleth with greedinefle of climbing hie,fo it hardly abi-
dcth to be brought lowe : therefore he hath fet tha: ktnde of fupcri-
ority for example, which by nature is moft amiable and leaft cnuious :
becaufe he might the eafciycr meeken and redaime our mindes to the
vfc
GodtheRedemer. Lib.2. 155
vfeof fubmjflion. Therefoie the Lorde doth bylitle and litle trainc
vs to all lawful! fubiciflion by that which is moft eafy to bearc , foraf-
much as the rule of all is alike. For to whome he geueth any preemi-
nencCjhe doth communicate his owne name with them , Co farre as is
ffeceffarie to prcferue the fame preeminence : The name of Father,
God.and Lord,do (6 belong vnto him alone,that fo ofte as we hearc
one of them namcd,ourmindc muft needes be touched with a fcchng
of his maiefty.Therforc whom he makcth partakers of thcfe thinges,
he maketh to gliftcr with a certaine fparke of his brightnefie,that tncy
may be honorable euery one according to his dcgrec.Therfore in him
that is our father we haue to cofider fomewhat of the nature of God,
bycaufe he bcareth not the name of God without caufe . He that is
our Prince or our Lord,hath fome partaking of honour with God.
^6 Wherfore it ought not to be doubted that God doth here fee
a generall rule,that as we know any man to be by his ord:naunce fet
ouer vs,fo we yeelde vnto him reuercncCjObediencejthankefulneflTe,
and fuch other duetics as it lieth in vs to do. And it makcth no diffe-
rece,whcther they be worthy or vnworthy.For of what forte foeucr
they be,they haue not without the prouidence of God atteined that
place, by rcafon wherof the lawemakcr would haue them to be hono-
red. Yet namely he hath geucn commaundement of reueiece to pa-
rentes, that haue brought vs into this life , to which rcuercnce very Exo.s
nature oa^'ht in a mancr to inftrud vs. For they arc monfters and not ^eui.:
men , that breakc the authoritie of parcntes with diflionor or ftub- **
burnnefle. Therefore the Lord commaundcdall the difobedient to ^'u**
their parcntes,to be flaine,as men vnworthy to enioy the benefite of ^^.^ ^^
light, that do not reknowledge by whofe meanes they came into it. ,0/
And by many additions of the lawe it appearcth to be true thatwc Dcu.j
haue noted, that there are three partes of honour that he here fpea- * ^*
keth of, Reuerence , Obedience , and ThankefuUneflc. The firft of ^^**
thefe the Lord eftablyfheth when he commaudcth him to be killed F.ph.5
thatcurfeth his Father or his Mother, for there he punirtieth the Col.j
contempt and diHionour of them. The feconde he confirmeth when »<>•
he appointeth the puniflimcnt of death for the difobedient and re-
bellious children.To the thirde belon^eth that faying of Chrift in
the fiftcne of Matthew , that it is the commaundement of God that
we do good to our parentes. And fo oft as Paulc maketh mention of
a comaundcmcnt,he expoundeth that therein obedience is required.
57 There is annexed a promife for a commendation, which doth
the rather put vs in minde , how acceptable vnto God is the fubmif-
fion that is here commaunded . For Paule vfech the fame pricke to
V iij.
Cap.8. Of the knowledge of
fiirrc vp our dulnclfe when he faieth : that this is the firft commaun*
dement with promife . For the promife that went before in the fiift
Table, was not fpeciall and proprely belonging to one commaunde-
fnent,but extcdcd to the whole law. Now this is thus to be raken:Thc
Lord fpake to the Ifiaclucs peculiarly of the landc which he had pro-
milcd them for their inheritance. If then the poU'eftion of lande was
a pledge of Gods bountyfullnefle -.let vs not meruell if it pleafed God
to declare his fauour by geumg length of life, by which a man might
long cnioye his benefit. The meaning therefore is thus. Honour thy
Father and thy Mothcr,that by a long fpacc of life tliou mayft enioy
the poirdTion of that lande tfiat fhalbe vntothecforateftimonic of
my Father. But fith all the eanh is blefled to the faithfull , we do not
worthily rccken this prefenthfc among the bleffingcs of God.Ther-
fore this promife doth Ukewifc belong vntovs, forfomuch as the
continuance of this life isa proofeof Gods goodwill. For it neither
is promifcd to vs,nor was promifed to the Icwcs, as though it contai-
ned bleffedneire m it felfc , but bycaufe it is wont to be to the Godly
a token of Gods tender loue. Thei fore if it chauncc that an obedient
child to his pareces be taken out of this life before his ripe age,which
is oftentimes feene , yet doth God no leffe conftantly continue in the
perfoormance of his promife,than if he (houlde rewarde,him with a
hundreth Acres of lande , to whome he promifed but one Acre. All
conlifteth in this, that we fliould cofider that long hfe is fo farre pro-
mifed vs,a$ it is the bhfling of God, and that it is his bleffing fo farre
as it is a proofe of his fauour , which he by death doth much more
plentifully and perfcdly witnefle and fhew in effed to his feruauntes.
^8 Moreouer,whcn the Lorde promifech the bleffing of this pre-
fcntc life to tiie children that honour their parentes with fuchreue-
rence as they ought , he doth withall fecreily fay , that moft afilired
curfc hangcth oucr the ftubbomc and difobedient children. And that
the fame fhouldc not want execution : he pronounccth them by bis
law fobied to the iudgement of death, and commaundeth them to be
put to execution:& if they efcapc that iudgcment,he him felfe taketh
vcngeauncc on them by one meane or other. For we fee how great a
numbre of that forte of men are flaine in battailcs and in fiaies , and
fomc other tormented in ftrangc vnaccuftomed fartiions, and they all
in a manner are a proofe that this threatning is not vaine . But if any
cfcape to olde age , fith in this life being depriucd of the blefling of
God, they do nothing but miferably languilh and are refcrued for
greater paines hereafter , they arc farre from being partakers of the
ble^mg promifed to the godly children . But this is alfo by the way
. GodtheRedemer. Lib.2, 15^
to be noted , that wc are not commaundcd to obey them but in the
Lorde. And that is euident by the foundation before layed : for they
lit on hie in that place whereunto the Lorde hath aduaunced them,
by communicating with them a portion of his honour. Therfore the
fubmiflion that is vfed towarde them , ought to be a fteppe towardc
the honouring of that foucraigne Father. Wherefore, if they mouc
vs to tranfgrefle the lawe , then are they worthily not to be accomp-
ted parentes , but ftraungers that labour to withdraw vs from obe-
dience to the true Father.And fo is to be thought of PrinceSjLordes
and all fortes of fuperioiures. For it is fhamefull and againft conue-
nienceofreafon, that their preeminence fhouLde preuaile topreflTc
downe his highnclTe , fith theyrcs as it hangeth wholy vpon it , fo
ought oncly to guide vs vnto it.
The fixt Commaundemenr,
Thou /halt not k^ll,
^9 The cndc of this commaundement is> that forafmuch as God
hath bounde together all mankinde with a certaine vnitie,that euery
man ought to regarde the fafetie of ailmen,as a thing geuen him in
charge.In fumme therefore,all violence and wrong.yea and all harme
doing, wherby our neighboures bodie maie be hurte, is forbidden vs.
And therfort we are commaunded , if there be any power of fuccouc
in our trauaile to defende the hfe of our neighboures , that we faith-
fully imploy the fame , that we procure thofe thingcs that may make
for their quiet, that wc watch tokeepe them f om hurte, and if they
be in any daunger,that we geue them our helping hand.lf thou con-
fider that it is God the lawemaker that fo faith , then thinkc withall
that his meaning is by this rule alfo to gouerne thy foule.For it were
afonde thing to thinke , that he which efpieth the thoughtes of the
hearte,and principally refteth vpon them,{hould inftrud nothing buc
the body to true rigbteoufnefle. Therefore the manflaughter of the
hearte is alfo forbidden in this lawe, and an inwarde affedion to pre-
ferue our brothers life is here geuen in commaundement.The handc
in decde bringeth fourth the manflaughter,but the mindc conceiueth
it , when it is infeSed with wrath and hatred. Looke whether thou
canft be angry with thy brother without burning in defire to do him
hurte. If thou canft not be angry with him,thcn canft thou not hate
him , for afmuch as hatred is nothing but an olde rooted anger . Al-
though thou diffemble and go aoout to winde out thy felfe by vainc
circumftanqps : yet where anger or hatred is , there is an affedion to
hurte.If thou wiU ftdi dally out with (hiftcs to defende it,it is already 1.I9!?
V iiij.
Cap.8. Of the Icnovvledge of
pronounced by the mouth of the holy Ghoft , that he is a manflcycr
that haccth his brother in his hearte. It is pronounced by the mouth
^lj,„ of ilie Lorde Chrift, that he is gilty of iudgement that is angry with
n. his brother : that he is gilcy of the counfell that faith Racha : that he
is gilty of Hell fier, that faith vnto him, Foole.
40 The Scripture noteth two poinres of cquitic,vpon which this
commaundcmentis grounded : bycaufe manne is both the image of
God and our ownc fielh , wherefore vnlefTe we will defile the image
of God , v/e muft haue care to touche man none otherwife , than as
a facred thing : and vnleffe we will put of ail naturallncffe of man, we
muft cherifh him as our Jwnc fldTi. That maner of exhortation that
is fetched from the redemption and grace of Chrift,fliall be entreated
of in an other place . God willed thefe two thinges naturally to be
coniidered in man,chat might pcrfwadc vs to the preferuatio of him,
that we fliould both reuerence the image of God emprinted in him,
and embrace our owne fiefhe. He hath not therefore cfcapedrhe
crime of manflaughter , that he hath kept him felfe from Hieding of
bloude. If thoucommicteany thingcindede, if thou go about any
thing with endeuour , if thou conceiuc any thing in defirc and pur-
pofe that is againft the fafetie of an other , thou art holden gilty of
manflaughter. And againe : If thou do not trauaile to thy power and
as accaHon may ferue to defende his life , thou doeft wifh like haine-
oufneflc otFcnde the lawe. But if there be fo much care taken for the
fafetic of his body , let vs hereby gather , how much ftudie and tra-
ua le IS due to the fafetic of his loulc, which in the Lordes fight doth
infinitely excel! the bodic.
The fcucnth Comtnaundemenc.
, Thou (halt not committe adHlterie,
41 The ende of the comaundement is,that bycaufe God loueth
charitic and cleanneflc , therefore allvncleanncfle ought to dcpartc
farr^ away from vs. The fumme therefore fnall be,that we be defiled
with no vncleannefle or luftfull intemperance of the flefli:Whervnto
aunfwcreth the affirmatiue commaundement , that we chafteiy and
continently ordre all the partes of our hfe . But fornication he for-
biddeth by name, 10 which all vnchafte lufte tendeth, that the filthi-
ncfle of that which is more groITe and fenfible , for fomuch as italfo
defileth the body , he might bring vs to abhorre all filthy lufte. Sith
manne was created in this eftate, not to hue a folitarie life , but to vfc
a helper ioined vnto himrand fins that by the curie of fimie he is dri-
ucn the more to this ncccfTtcie , the Lord hath in this bchalfe proui-
dcd
GodtheRcdcmcr. Lib.2^ 157
ded help for him fo mucli as was fufhcient , when he ordained mari-
agc, when he fandified with his bleflinge the feilowfhip begonnc by
his authority .Where by followcth,that all other fcllowlhip of man &
woman out of mariage,is accurfcd before him,& that the feilowfhip
of mariage it felfe,was ordained for remedy of nccefTuyjV we Should
not runnc out into vnbridled luft.Therefore let vs not flatter our fel-
ues, iith we heare that man can not be coupled with woman out of
mari3ge,withouc the curfe of God.
42 Nowe forafmuch as by the condition of nature , and by luft
more cnkindeled ^ns the fall of man, we are become doutely fubicdl
to dehre of company of women,except it be ihofe whom God of his
(ingular grace hath exempted from it.'lei eucry man looke well what
is giuen vnto him. Virginity, I graunt, is a vcrtue not to be dcfpifed:
but fith it is to fome denicd,and to fome grauted but for a time,lette
them that arc troubled with incontinence and ftriuinge with it, can
not get the vpper handejreforte to the hclpe of mariagc,that fo they
may kecpc chaftity in the degree of their vocation. For they that can
not conceiue this word , if chey do not fuccour their owne intempe-
rance with the remedy that is otfered and graunted them , they ftriue
againft God and relJll his ordinaunce . And let no man carpe againft
me ( as many do at this day ) that bcinge aided with the hclpe of
Godjhe can do all thingcs.For the helpe of God is prcfent only with ^^^- '
ihoic.that walke in bis wayes,that in their vocation from which they '* * '
do all withdrawe themfelucs , which forfakinge the hclpcs of God,
do trauellcoouercome and maifter their neccffity with vainc rafh
boldnefle . The Lord affirmeth that continence is a lingular gift of
God, & of that forte that are not giuen generally, nor vniuerfally to
the whole body of the Church,but to a few members thereof . For
firft he fayth , that there is a certajne kinde of men , that haue gelded
tkemfelues for thekingdomeof Heauen, that is, that they might
the more loofely and freely applie themfelucs to the aftayrcs of the
heauenly kingdomc . But , that no man fhould thinke that fuch ocl-
dinge is in the power of man , he flicwcd a htle before , that all men
are notable torecciue it, but they to whom it is peculiarly giuen m^j.,
from heauen, whereupon he concludcth .• He that can take it, let him i ».
take it. But Paul yet affirmeth it more plamly,whcrc he wrytcth,that ^-Cot.
euery man hath his proper gift of God, one thus,and an other thus.7»
45 Whereas we are by open declaration admonilhed,that it is not
in euery mans power to keepc chaftity in lingle life , although with
ftudy and trauaile he indcuour neuer fo much vnto it, and that it is a
peculiar grace , which God giueth but to certainc men, chat he ma/
Cap.8. Of the knowledge of
pronounced by the mouth of the holy Ghoft , that he is a manflcycr
that haicth his brother in his heartc. It is pronounced by the mouth
jijj 5 of tlie Lorde Chrift, that he is gilty of iudgement that is angry with
i. his brother : that he is gilcy of the counfell chat faith Racha : that he
is gilty of Heil fier, that faith vnto him, Foole.
40 The Scripture noteth two pointes of cquitie,vpon which this
commaundcment is grounded : bycaufe manne is both the image of
God and our ownc flelh , wherefore vnlefTe we will defile the image
of God , v/e muft haue care to touche man none other wife , than as
a facred thing : and vnlcfle we will put of all naturallneffe of man, we
muft cherifh him as our uwnc flslli. That maner of exhortation that
is fetched from the redemption and grace of Chrift,(hall be entreated
of in an other place . God willed thefe two thinges naturally to be
coniidered in man,that might pcrfwade vs to the preferuatio of him,
that we fliould both reuerence the image of God emprinted in him,
and embrace our owne flefhe. He hath not therefore cfcaped rhc
crime of manfliughter , that he hath kept him felfe from flieding of
bloude. If thou commicte any thmge in dcde , ifthou go about any
thing with endeuour, if thou conceiuc any thing in defire and pur-
pofe that is againft the fafetie of an other , thou art holden gilty o(
manflaughter. And againe : Ifthou du not trauaile to thy power and
as accafion may ferue to defende his life , thou docft wirti like haine-
oufneflc pfFcnde the lawe. But if there be fo much care taken for the
fafetie of his body , let vs hereby gather , how much ftudie and tra-
ua.le is due to the fafetie of his IbulCi which in the Lordes light doth
infinitely cxccll the bodic.
The fcucnth Commaundcment.
Thou (halt not committe aduUerie,
4 1 The ende of the comaundement is,that bycaufe God loueth
charitie and cleanneflc , therefore all vnclcannefle ought to departe
farr^ away from vs. The fumme therefore Ihall bc,thac we be defiled
with no vncleannefle or luftfull intemperance of the fle(h:Whervnto
aunfwereth the affirmatiue commaundcment , that we chaftely and
continently ordre all the partes of our life . But fornication he for-
biddeth by name, to which all vnchafte lufte tendeth, that the filthi-
ncfife of that which is more groffe and fenfible , for fomuch as italfo
dcfileth the body , he might bring vs to abhorrcall filthy lufte. Sith
manne was created in this eftate, not to Hue a folitarie life , but to vfc
a helper ioincd vnto himrand fins that by the curfc of finne he is dri-
ucn the more to this ncccflttic , the Lord hath in this bchalfc proui-
dcd
GodthcRcdcmcr. Lib.2r 157
dcd help for him fo much as was fufficient , when he ordained mari-
age, when he fandified with his bleflinge the feilowfliip begonnc by
his authority .Whereby followcth,that all other fcUowfhip of man 8c
woman out of mariage,is accurfcd before him,& that the fellowfhip
of mariage it felfe,was ordained for remedy of ncceflityjy we fhould
not runnc out into vnbridled luft.Thcrcfore let vs not flatter our fel-
ues, iith we heare that man can not be coupled with woman out of
mariagcwithout the curfe of God.
4Z Nowe forafmuch as by the condition of nature, and by luft
more enkindeled ^ns the fall of man, we are become doutely fubic^
to dehre of company of women,except it be thofe whom God of his
lingular grace hath exempted from it:lec eucry man looke well what
is gmen vnto him. Virginity, I graunt, is a vcrtue not to be defpifed:
but (ith it is to fome demed>and to fome graijted but for a time,ietce
them that are troubled with incontinence and flriuingc with it, can
not get the vppcr hande,reforte to the helpc of mariagc,that fo they
may kccpc chaftity in the degree of their vocation. For they that can
not conceiue this word , if they do not fuccour their owne intempe-
rance with the remedy that is offered and graunted them , they ftriue
againft God and refilt his ordinaunce . And let no man carpe againft
me C as many do at this day) that bemge aided with the hclpe of
Godjhe can do all thmgcs.For the helpe of God is prefent only with ^^^« '
ihofcjthat walkein bis wayes,thatin their vocation from which they *'* *
do all withdrawe themfelucs , which forfakinge the hclpcs of God,
do trauell to ouercome and maifter their ncccffity with vaine rafh
boldnelTe . The Lord affirmeth that continence is a fingular gift of
God, & of that forte that are not giucn generally, nor vniuerfally to
the whole body of the Church,but to a few members thereof . For
firfthcfayth ,thatthereisacercaJnekindeofmen, that haue gelded
themfelues for thekingdomcof Heauen, that is, that they might
the more loofely and freely applie themfelucs to the affayres of the
heauenly kingdome . But , that no man ihould thinke that fuch g,cl-
dinge is in the power of man , he (he wed a htle before , that all men
arc notable toreceiue it, but they to whom it is peculiarly giucn ^j^j.,
from heauen, whereupon he concludeth ; He that can take it, let him i ».
take it. But Paul yet affirmeth it more plainly,whcre he wrytcth,that i-Cof.
cuery man hath his proper gift of God, one rhus,3nd an other thus. 7*
45 Whereas we are by open declaration admonilhed,that it is not
in euery mans power to keepe chaftity in (ingle life , although with
{ludy and trauaile he indeuour neuer fo much vnto it, and that it is a
peculiar grace , which God giuetb but to certainc men, that he may
Cap. 8. Of the knowledge of
haue the the tnorc ready to his workc : do we not ftriue agalnft God
and nature which he hath inftitute , if we do not apply the kinde of
our hfc to the proportion of our power ? Here the Lord forbiddeth
fornication,thcrefore he requireth cleanncfle and chaftity of vs. To
keepe the fame there is but one way , that euery man mcafure him
fclfc by his owne mcafure . Neither lette a man defpife mariage as a
ihinge vnprofitable or fuperfluous for him,nor otherwife dcfire fin-
tle hfe, vnleffe he be able to liue without a wife. And therein alfo let
iim not prouidc onely for the quiet and commodity of the flefli,bui:
only that being loofed from this bond,hc may be the more in readi-
ncife & prepared to ail ducties of GodlineiTe. And forafmuch as this
benefit is giuen to many but for a time,lct cuery ma fo long abftainc
fro mariage as he (halbe mectc to liue to kepe lingle cftatc,If ftregth
fade him to tame his luil^let him learne that the Lord hath now laied
br.7 vpon him a neceflicy to marry. This the Apoftic fhcweth when he
■9* commaundeth that to auoide fornication eucry man haue his owne
wife,and euery woman haue her owne husband, that he that can not
liue continently fliould mary m the Lord.Firft he declareth,that the
moft part of men arc fubied to y vice ofinc6tincncc:& then of thofe
that be fubicd vnto ic,he cxcepteth none,but comaundeth all to that
only remedy,wherewith vnchaftity is i efiftedTherefore if they that
be incontinent do ncgled to hclpe their infirmity by this meane,they
finnc cucn in this that they obey not the commaundemet of the A-
poftlc.Ncither let him flatter himfelfe that toucheth not a woman as
though he couldc not be rebuked of vnchaftity , while in the mcane
:or.< fcafon his mmdc bumeth inwardly with iuft. For Paule defineth cha-
ftity to be a cleanncs of the minde , ioyned with chaftity of the body.
A woman vnmaricd(fayth he)thinkcth vpon thofe things that are of
the Lordjforafmuch as ftiee is holy both in body and in ipirit. Thcr-
fore when he bringeth a reafon to confirme that former commaun-
demcnt.he doth not only fay, that it is better for a ma to take a wife,
than to defile himfelfe,with company of a harlot, but he fay th, that
it is better to mary than to burnc.
44 Now if maried folkes do confeflfe that their fellowlhip toge»
thcr is blefied of the Lord,they are thereby admonifticd not to defile
it with intemperate and diflblute luft:For though the honefty of ma-
nage do couer y filthines of incontinence, yet it ought not forthwith
to be a prouocation therof Wherfore let not maried folkes thinke,
that all thinges are lawfull vnto them , but let cuery husbande haue
his owne wife fobcrly , and hkewife the wife her husband , and fo
doingc, lette them commicte nothing ynbefeeming the honefty and
tempc-
God the Redemer. Lib.2 158
temperance of mariage . For (o ought manage made in the Lord to
be rtftraintd to meafure and modefty, and not to ouerftow into euc-
ry kindc of extreme lafciuioufneffc . This wantonneflTe Ambroferc- Am.lifc.
proued with a faying very fore in decdcjbut not vnfite for it,when he de phiL
calleth the husbandejthe adulterer of his owne wife, which in vfe of
wedlocke hath no careof (hamefaftnefle or honcfty. Laft of all,let vs
confider what lawemaker doth here condemne fornication, euen h«
which fith of his owne righthe ought to pofleflc vs whoily,rcquireth
purenefle of the foule, fpirite and body. Therefore when he forbid-
deth to commit fornication,he alfo forbiddeth with wanton attire of
body, with vncleanly gettures, & with filthy talkc to lay waite to trap
an others chaftity. For that faying is not without good rcafon,which
Archelaus fpakc to a yong man aboue meafure wantonly and deintc-
ly clothed, that it made do matter m what parte he were filthily vn-.
chaft.if VTC haue regard vnio God that abhorreth all hlthines in what
foeuer part either of our foule or body it appeareth. And to put thee
out of dout, remember that the Lord here commendeth chaftity . If
the Lorde require chaftity of vs, then he condemneth all that euer is
againft it. Therefore if thou couet to (hew obedience, neither let thy
mindeburne inwardly with euillluft, nor lette thine eyes runne wan-
tonly into corrupt aftedions , nor let thy body be trimmed vp for al-
lurement,nor let thy tongue with filthy talke entifc thy minde to hke
thoughtes , nor let thy gluttonous belly enflame thee with intempc-
rance.For all thefe vices arc,as it were,certainc blottcs,whcrwith the
pureneiTe of chaftity is befpotted.
The eight Commaundcmenc
ThoH [halt notfieale.
4^ The ende of this commaundementis^bccaufe God abhorreth
vnrightcoufne{re,y euery man may haue his owne rendred vnto hini.
The fumme therefore (hall be , that wc are forbidden to gape for o-
ther mens goodes , & that therefore we are commaunded^uery man
to employ his faythfull trauaile to prefcrue to eche man his owne
goodes.For thus we ought to thinke,that what euery man poflTelTeih
is not happened vnto him by chaunce of fortunejbut by the diftribu-
lion of rhe foucraigne Lord of all things, & therforc no mans goods
can be gotten from him by euill meancs, but that wronge be done to
the difpofition of God.But of theftes there be many kindesrone ftan-
deth in Violence, whe y goods of an other are by any maner offorcc
and robbinge licentioufnefle bereued. The other kinde confifteth in
malicious deceitcj where chey arc guilefully conucicd away. An other
Cap.8. Of the knowledge of
forte there is chat (landcch in a more hidden luttelty, when they are
wrong from the owner by colour of law e. An other forte in flaitcrie,
where they arc fucked away by prctenfe of gift. But leaft wc fhouldc
tary too longc vpon rentingc of all the feuerall kindes of theft , lettc
vs know , that all crafty mcanes whereby the poffeflions and money
of our neighboures arc conueyedvnto vs, when they once go by
crooked wayes from finccrenefle of heart,to a defire tobeguiie,or by
any meane to do hurr,3re to be accompted for theftes. Although by
pleadinge the lawe , thsy may preuaile , yet God doth not othcrwifc
wcy them. For he fceth the longc captious futtelcies, wherewith the
guilefull man beginneth to entangle the (implcr minde , till at length
he drawc him into his nettes. He feeth the hard and vngentle lawes,
wherwith the mightier opprelTeth and throweth downc the weaker.
He feeth the allurementes,wherwith as with baited hookes, the craf«
tier takcth thee vn ware. All which things are hidden from the iudge-
ment of man , and come not in his knowledge . And this manner of
wrong is not only in money,in wares,or in landes,but in euery mans
right. For we defraude our neighbour of his goodes, if we deny him
thofe ciueties which we are bound to do for him. If any idle fador or
bailie do deuour his maiftcrs fublUnce,& is not hccdeful to the care
of his thriftjif he either do wrongfully fpoilc,or do rioroufly waft the
fubftance commited vnto him, if a feruauntdomockc his maifter,if
he difclofe his fecrctes by any meancs , if he betray his hfe and hi$
goodes ; againc if the Lord do cruelly opprefle his houfcholde,they
are before God gilt^ of theft.For he both withholdeth & conueieth
an other mans goodes, which performcth not that which by the of-
fice of his calling he ov/eth to other. •
46 Wc (hall therforc rigliily obey this commaundement,if being
contented with our ownc eftate » we fceke to get no gaine but honeft
and lawful,if we couct not to waxc rich with wrong,nor go about to
fpoile our neighbour of his goodes that our owne fubftance may en-
creafe , if we labour not to heape vp cruell riches and wronge out of
others mens bloodjif we do not immeafurably fcrape coajether eucry
way,by right and by wrong,that either our couetoufnefTe may be fiU
ied,or our prodigality farisfied. But on the other fide,lette this be our
pcrpetuall marke , to aide all men faithfully by counfell and helpc to
Kccpe their owne fo farre as wc may : but if we haue to do with falfe
and deceitfull men , lettc vs rather be ready to yeelde vp fome of our
ownCjthcn to ftriuc with them.And not that only,but let vs commu-
nicate to their neccflitie$,& with our ftore relieue their neede, whom
WC fee to be oppreifed with hard and poore eftate. Finally ,lette euery
man
GodtheRcdcmcr. Lib.2. 159
man looke how much he is by ducty bounde vnto ocher.and let him
fakhfuUypayit. For this reaibn Ictte the people hauc in honor all
thofe that are fct oucr them^et them paciently bearc their goucrnc-
menr, obey their lawes and commaundcmenics, rcfufc nothing that
they may bcarc,(hll kccpinge God fauourable vnto them. Agamcjlet
them take care of their peoplejprcfcrue common pcace,defende the
goodjreftraine the cuil»& Co order all things,as ready to giue accompt
of their office to the foucraigne iudge.Let the Minifiers of churchcf
faithfully applie their minillery, and not corrupt the do^rinc offal*
uation,but dcliuer it pure & finccre to the people of God,andlet the
inftrud them notoncly with learning, but alfo with example of hfc:
finaliyjiet the fo be ouer thc,a$ good fhepcherdes be oucr the fncpc.
Let the people hkewife receiue them for the mcllingers & Apoftles
of God, giue them that honor whereof the hieft maiftcr hath vout-
faucd them,and minifter vnto them fuch thinges as are neceffary for
their hfe. Lette parentes take on them to feede,rule and teach theyr
childrcn,as committed to them of Godj& greue nof5nor turnc awajr
their mindcs from them with cruelty, but rather cherifh & embrace
them with fuch lenity and tendernefle , as becommcth there perfon.
After which manner,we haue already fayd,that children owe to their
parentes their obedience.Lct yong men rcucrencc olde age, cuen as
the Lord willed that age to be honorable.Let old men alio gouernc
the weakenes of youth with their wifedom and experience, wherein
they excell yonge men,not ratinge them with rough and Icude braw-
lingSjbut tempering feucrity with mildencflc and gentlenelTe. Lectc
feruaunjtes fhcw themfelues diligent and feruifable to obey : and that
not to the cye,buc from the heart,as feruing God himfelfe. Alfo lettc
maiftcrs fliewe themfelues not tefty and hard to plcafc , nor opprcflc
them with to much (harpencs, not reprochfuUy vfe them, but rather
acknowledge that they arc their brethren and rheir fellow fcruauntes
vnder the heauely Lord,whom they ought mutually to loue& gerly
to entreat. After this manner,! fayjlct cuery man confidcr what in his
degree and place he oweth to his neighbours,snd let him pay that he
owcth.Morouer our minde ought alwayes to haue refpe(^ to the law
mak£r,thac wc may know that this law is made as wel for our mindes,
as for our handes.rhat men fliould Hudy to defend & funbcc the com-
modities and proiite of other.
The ninth commaundemenr,
Thoufhalt not be a lyinq^ vftmfje againji thy neighltot^,
47 The end of tliis commaundement is diat becaufc God whichii
Cap.8. Of the knowledge of
trueth abhorreth lyingc,we ought to obferuc tiueth without cfcceit-
full colour . The fumme therefore ihall be, that we neither hurt any
mans name either with flaundcrs or fahe rcportes , nor hinder him
in his goodcs by lyinge : finally that we offcnde no man , by luft to
fpeake euill, or to be bufic : with which prohibition is ioyned a com-
maundement , that fo farre as we may , we employ our faithfull en-
dcuour for euery man in affirming^ the tructii , to defende the fafety
both of his name and goodcs. Itfeeme'th that the Lord purpofed to
expounde the meaning of his comaundement in the three & twenty
jjjjj jj. Chapter of Exodus in thefe wordes.Thou ilialtnot vfc the voyce of
I. lying , nor {halt ioyne thy hande to fpeakc falfe wimcflc for the wic-
Leui.15 kcd. Againe^Thou lli alt flee lying. Alfo in an other place he doth not
*^ onely call vs away from lyinge in this point that we be no accufers*
or whifpercrs in the people,but alfo that no man decaue his brother
forheforbiddeth them both infeuerall commaundcmentes. Truely
it is no dout , but that as in the commaundcmentes before , Iks hath
forbidden cruelty,vnchaftity & couetoufnes,fo in this he reftraineth
falfhoodc . Whereof there are two partes as we haue noted before.
For either we ofFende the good name of our neighbours by malici-
oufneffe and froward minde to backebite,or in lying and fometime rn
euill fpcakinge we hinder their commodities . There is no difterence
whether in this place be vndcrftanded folemne & iudiciall teftimony,
or common teftimony that is vfcd in priuate talkes . For we muft al-
way haue recourfc to this principle , that of all the gencrall kindes of
▼ices one fpeciall forte is fetfor an example jwheieun to the reft may
be referred,and that that is chiefely choien, wherein the filthinefte of
the fault IS moft apparaunt. Albeit, it were conuenicnt to extcnde it
more generally tollaunders and linifter backcbitingcs wherewith out
neighbours are wrongfully grccucd, for that falihoode of witncflingc
which is vfcd in ludiciall courtes,is neucr without periury . But per-
juries infomuch as they do prophane and defile the name of God, arc
already fufficiently met withall in the third commaundcment.Wher-
fore the right vfe of this commaundement is , that our tongue in af-
firminge the trueth do ferue both the good name and profite of our
ncighbours.The equity thereof is more than manifeft. For if a good
name be more precious than any trcafurcs,whatfoeuer they be: then
is it no leftc hurt to a man to be fpoyled of the goodnefte of his name
than of his goodcs . And in bereuing his fubftaunce, fometime falfc
wirncflc doth as much as violence of handes .
48 And yet it is maruelous vv how negligent careleftenefle men dd
commonly oCndc in this poinc^foy there are found very few tl,iat are
not
GodtheRedemcr. Lib.2. x6o
not notably fickcof this difcafe: wc arc fb much delitcd with a certaine
poifoned fwctencs both in fcarching out & in difclofing the cuills of
other. And let vs not thinkc y it is a fufficient cxcufcjif oftentimes we
lye not. For he y forbiddcth thy brothers name to be defiled w lying,
willcth alfo that it be prefcrucd vntouched fo farre as the trueth vviU
fuffcr.For howfoeucr he takcth hcedc to himfelfe only,ro that he tcU
no lye,yet in the fame he fecretly confc-fTeth that he hath fomc charge
of him. But this ought to fuffice v$ to kepe fafe our neighbours good
name,that God hath care of it. Whcrfore without dout all euill /pea-
king is vtterly condemned. But wc meane not by cuill fpeakingCjthat
rebukinge which is vfed for chaftifement ; nor accufation,or iudiciall
proccfle5wherby remedy is fought for an cuill,nor publike reprehen-
fion which tendeth to put other finners in fcare , nor bcwrayingc of
faultes to them for whofc fafety it behoucd that they fliould be for-
wamed Icaft they (hould be in daunger by ignoraunce:but wc mcane
only hatefull accufing , which arifcth of malicioufncfTc and of a wan-
ton will to backebitc , Alfo this commaundement is extended to this
point,that wc couct not to vfc a fcoffing kinde of a pleafauntnes,but
mingclcd with bitter tauntcs, thereby bitingly to touch other mens
faultes vnder prctcnfe of paftimcjas many do that fcckc praifc of mc-
ry conceitcs with other mens fhamc yea & greefc,alfo when by fuch
wanton railing many times our neighbours arc not a litle rcproched.
Now if we bende our eyes to the lawmaker , which muft accordinge
to his rightfull authority bearc rule no leffe ouer the cares and
mindc than ouer the tonguertruely wc fhall finde that grecdinclTe to
heare backebitings,and a hafty readincs to euill iudgcmcntes are no
leflc forbidden.For it were very fond if a man fhould thinke that God
hateth the fault of euill fpeakinge in the tongue , and doth not difa-
lowc the fault of euill nialicioufncflc in the heartc. Wliereforcif
there be in vs a true fearc and loue of Godjlet vs cndeuour (b farre as
we may and as is expedient, and as charity beareth, that wc giue nei-
ther our tongue , nor our cares to euill fpeakingcs , and bitter ie-
ftinges , leaft we rafhly without caufe yeeldc our mindes to indircd
fufpicions. But being indiflFcrcntexpofitours of all mens fayinges and
doinges , let vs both in iudgcmcnt,carcs,and tongue gently prcfcrue
their honor fafe.
The tenth Commaundemenr.
Thou ftjalt not couet thy mighbours houfe^ ^r.
4p The end of this cumaun dement is,y becaufey lords wi! is ths:
Cap* 8. Of the knowledge of
our foulc be wholly polTefTed with the affcdio of loue.all luft is to be
(hake out of our minde that is contrary to charity. The fumme ther-
fbre fliall be , that no thought creepe into vs , which may moue our
mindes with a concupifcens hurtfiill and turningc toward an others
loflTcrwherewith on the other tide agreeth the commaundemcnt,that
whatfoeuer we conceiucjpurpofe, will or fludy vpon,be ioyned with
the benefit and commodity of our neighbonrs.But here,as it femeth,
arifeth a hard and comberfome difficulty. For if it be truely fayd of vs
before thatvndcr the names of fornication and theft are contayned
thcluft of fornication , and the purpofc to hurt and deceiue, it may
fecmc fuperfluoufly rpoken,that the couetinge of other mens goodcs
fhoulde afterward be fcueraily forbidden vs . But the diftindioh be-
twencpurpofeandcouetinge, will eafily lofc vs this knot. Forpur-
pofe ( as we hauc meant in fpeakinge of it in the other commaundc-
mentes before ) is deliberate confent of will,when luit hath fubdued
thcmindc : but couc tinge may be without any fuch either aduife-
mcnt or aflent, when the minde is only pricked & tickled with vainc
and peruerfe obiecles . As therefore the Lord hath heretofore com-
maunded, that the rule of charity fiioulde gouerne our willes,ftudic$
and workes : fo he now commaundeth the conceptions of our minde
to be direded to the fame rule , that there be none of them crooked
and writhenjthat may prouoke our minde an other way. As he hath
forbidden our minde to be bowed and leddc into wrath , hatred,for-
nication, robberyj and lying : fo he doth now forbid vs to be moucd
thereunto.
5c And not without caufe doth he require fo great vprightncflc.
For who can deny that it is righteous,thatal the powers of the foulc
be polTefTed with charity ?But if any of the do fwaruc from the marke
of charity , who can deny that it is difcafcd ? Now whenfc commeth
it that fo many defires hurtefull to thy neighbour do enter into thy
heart, but of this, that negleding him thou careft onely for thy felfc?
For if thy minde were altogether throughly foked with charity , no
perccll thereof fhoulde be open to fuch imaginations. Therefore it
muft ncedes be void of charity , fo farre as it receiueth concupifcens.
But fome man will obied,th3t yet it is not meete that phantalies that
arc wout order toiled in mans wit,& at length do vanifh away, fhould
be condemned for concupifcence,whofe place is in the heart.Iaun-
fwerc ; that here our queltion is of that kinde of phantalies, which
while they arc prefent before our mindes , do together bite and ftrike
our heart with defirc , forafmuch as it neuer commeth in our minde,
to wifli for any thing,bMt that our heart is ftirrcd vp and leapcth with-
all.
God the Rcdcmcr. Lib.2 . 1 6i
sAi Thcr fore God comaundeth a marueloiis feruccnes of loue which
he wiilcth not to be entangled with neucr To fmall fnares of concupi-
fcenccHe requireth a marueloufly framed minde, which he fuffcrerh ^
not fo much as with flight prouocatios to be any thing ftirred againft
the law of loue» To this expofition Auguftine did firft open me the
way : bccaufe thou fhouldell not thinke that it is without confcnt of
fome graue authority. And though the Lords purpofe was to forbid
vsall wrongfullcouttingryetinrehearnngthatfamejhc hath brought
forth for example thofe things that rooft comonly do decciuc vs with
a falfe image of dehght: becaufe he would leaue nothing to concupi-
fccnce when he dra weth it fiom thefe things, vpon the which it moft
of all rageth and triumpheth. Loc, here is the Iccondc Table of the
law, wherein we arc taught fufficiently what we owe to men for Gods
fake, vpon confideration wlicrof hangeth the whole rule of charity.
Wherfore you (hall but vainely call vpon thofe duc[ies that are con-
tained in this Table , vnlefle your dodrine do ftay vpon the fearc and
reuerencf of God, as vpon her foundation. As for them which fceke
for two commaundcmentcs in die prohibition of couetinge, the wife
readcr,though I fay nothing,will iudge that by wrong diuilion,rhey
tcare in funder that which was but one . And it maketh nothinge a-
gainft vSjthat this worde,Thou (halt not couct,is the fecond time re-
peated , for after that he had firit fct the houfc, then he renteth the
partes thereof, beginning at the wife; whereby it plaincly appcareth,
that Cas the Hcbrues do very wellj it ought to be read in one whole
fentence,and that God in effc(flcommaundeth,that al that euery maa
pofrefleth,(hould remaine fafe and vntouchedjnor oncly from wrong
and luft to defraudc them,but alfo from the very leaft defirc thacmay
moueourmindes.
5 1 But now to what endc the whole lawe tendcth, it (hall not be
hard to iudge:that is, to the fulfilling of righteoufneffcjthat it might
frame the life of man after the example of the pureneflc of God. For
p God hath therein fo painted out his owne nature , as if a man do
performc in dccdes that which is there commaunded , he {hall in a
manner exprelfe an image of God m his life. Therefore when Mofes
meant to bring the fummc thereof into the mindes of the Ifraelitcs,
he fayd ; And nowe Ifraell , what doth the Lorde thy God askc of
thee , but that thou feare the Lorde , and walkc in his waycs ? loue ,-1^"*^*
him and fcruc him in all thy heart, and in all tliy (bule, and keepe his
commaundementes ? And he ceaffed not ftill to fing the fame fong a-
gaine vnto them, Co oft as he purpofed to fliewc the cnde of the law.
The do^iine of the lawe hath fuch re(ped hereunto, that it ioyncth
X
Cap.8. Of the knowledge of
Deut.tf. marijOr as MdCcs in an other place teimcth it , maketh man to f!icl^^
5'^ ' '• faft to his God in hoHnefle of life. Now the perfedion of that holy*
neflc confiileth in the two principall pointes already rehcarfcd, That
we loue the Lorde God with all out hcarte , all our foule, and all our
Mat.»i Ihcngth, and our neighbour as our felues. And thefiiftindeedeiy,
that c ur foule be in all partes filled with the loue of God. From
that byandby of it felfc foorth floweth the loue of our neighbour.
i.Tim.x Which thing the Apoftle fheweth when he wryteth,that the code of
'^* rhe law is Loue out ofa pure confciencc, and 3 faith not fayncd. You
fee how^as it were, in the headc is fet confcicncc and faith vnfaynedi
that is to fay in one wordc true Godlinefle , and that from thcnfe is
charity deriued. Therefore he is deceiued,whofoeuer thinketh that
in the lawearc taught oncly ccrtaine rudimcntes and firft Introda-
dions of righteoufnefle , wherewith men became ro be taught their
firft Ichoolmge , but not yet dircdcd to the true marke of goo4
woorkcs: whereas beyonde that fcntence of Mofes and this of Paulc,
you cannc defire nothingcas wantingcof the highcft perfcdion.
For howe farrc , I pray you , wilth€ proceede that will not be con-
\ tented with this inftitution, whereby manne is inftruded to the fearc
of God, tofpirituallworfhippingc, to obeyinge of the commaun-
demente?, to follow thcvprightnes of the way of the Lord, finally to
purenefleof confcience,fincere faith and loue ? Whereby is confir-
med that expofidon of the law , which fcarchcthfor and findcth out
in the commaundcmentcs thereof all the duetics of Godlinefle
and loue.For they that follow onely the drie and bare principles,as if
it taught but the one halfe of Gods will,know not the end thtreofyas
the Apoftle wirnefleth.
51 But whereas in rehcai fin^ the fumme of the la w,Chrift & the
Apoftle do fomtimelcaue out y firft Tablc:many arc dcceiued therin
while they woulde faine draw their words to both the Tables. Cbnft
in Matthew calleth the chiefe pointes of the law,Mercy,Iudgemct &
Faithrvndcr the word Faiih,ir is not doutful to me,but that he mea-
ncth tiucth or fiithfulnefte toward men. But fome, that the fcntence
mit^ht be extended to the whole law, take it for rehgioufnefle toward
Matt.5. Gcd. Bur they labour in vainc. ForChrift fpeaketh ofthofcworkcs
*3' wherwith mnn ought to proue himfelfc righteous. This reafon ifwc
note,we will alfo ceffe to maruell why , when a yong man asked him
what be the commaundcmentcs by kcping wherof we enter into life:
he anfvvcred thef^e things only:Thou Ihalt not kil.Thou (halt not c6«
Mati9 nrt adultery. Thou (halt not fteale. Thou (halt bcarc no f;ilfc wit-
j3. ■' ncflc. Honor thy Father and thy Mothcr.Louc thy neighbour as thy
felfc.
GodthcRedemcr. Lib.2. 162
fclfe.For the obtying of the firlt Table confifted in manner all either
in the afFedion ot y heart)Or in ceremonicsrihc affcwlion of the hfarc
appeared not, & as for the ceremonies the hypocrites did continual-
ly vfe.But the workes of charity are fuchjSS by them we may declare
a perfed righteoufnefle . But this commcth eche where fo oft m the
prophetes, that itmurtneedes be familiar to a reader but meanely
cxercifed in them . For in a manner alway when they cxhorte to re-
pentaunce, they leaue out the firft Table , and only call vpon Fayih,
ludgemetjMercy & Equity. And thus they do noc ouerskip the fearc
of God , but they require the earneft profe thereof by the tokens
of ir.This is well knowe, that when they fpeakc of the keeping of the
laWjthey do for y moft part relt vpon the fecond T::ble,bec.iure ther-
jn the ftudy of rightcoufnes and vprightncfle is moit openly feene. It
is needclefle to rehcarfe the placcs,bccaufe cuery man will of himfelf
ea(ily marke that which I fay.
5^ But thou wilt fay,is it then more auaileablc to the perfedio of
righteoufncs, to liue innocently among men, than with rrue godhnes
to honor God?No,but becaufe a man doth not eai^ly kcpe charity in
all pointeSjVnles he earneftly feare God,therfore it is iherby proued,
that he hath godlinefle alfo. Belide that , forafmuch as the Lord well
knoweth,that no benefit can coo^e fromvs vntohim,which thing he
doth alfo tcftifieby y Prophet;thereforc he requirethnorour durties pfj| ^
to himfelfe,but doth exercifc vs m good wotkcs towarde our neigh-
bour.Thcrfore not without caufc the Apoftle fetteth the whole pcr-
fcdi5 of the holy ones in charity. And not incouenienrly in another Eph.i
place hecallcihy fame the fulfillinge ofthclawraddingth.nhe hath CoJof
performed y law that loucth his neighbour. Againe,That t?U y law is ' *•
comprehended in one word, Louc thy neighbour as thy fclfr.For he
tcacbeth no other thinge but the fame which Chrift doth when he
feuh:Whatfoeuer ye will that men do to you, do ye the fame to the. Mjtc.
For this is the law & the Prophcrs.l t is certaine,that in the law Si the » »•
Prophetes, Faith and all that belongcth to the true worfliip of God,
holdeth the principall place, & that Loue is beneth it in a lower de-
gree:but the Lords meaning is,That in the law is only prefcriScd tnto
vs an obferuation of right and cquity.wherin wc be excrcifed to icfti-
fie our godly feareofhim,iftherebeany invs.
^4 Here therfore let vs fticke faft,that then our life fhalbe beft fra-
med to Gods will and the rule of his law> when it fhall be cuery way
moft profitable to our brethren . But in the whole lawc there is not
redde one lillablethat appoinrech to man any rule of fuch rhin^cs as
he fhall do or leaue vndone to the commodity of his ownc He(h. An«i
X ij.
Cap. 8. Of the knowledge of
furelyfich men are fo borne of fuchdifpofition naturally that the^
. be too much caried all headlong to theloue of thcmfclucSjand how
much foeucr they fall from the trueth yet (lill they keepc that felfe
loue.there needed no law any moreto enflamc that louc,that was na-
u.Ii.i. turally of it felfe jtoo much beyonde meafure. Whereby it plainly ap-
; doft. peareih,that not the loue of our felucs, but y louc of God & of our
hr.ca. neighbour is the keeping of the commaundements,& that he liueth
^ • beii & moft hohly,y (fo nerc as may bc)hu€th & trauailcth Icaft for
hvmfelfe, & that no man liueth wotfe & more wickedly than he that
liueth and trauadeth for him felfe & only thinketh vpon and feekerh
for things of his owne.And the Lordjthe more to expreffe with hovf
• great earneftneffe we ought to be led to the loue of our neighbours,
appointed it to be meafurcd by the loue of our felues as by a rule,bc-
caufe he had no other vehement or ftronger afrc(ftion to meafure it
by. And the force of the maner of fpeakinge is diligently to be weyed.
For he deth not,as cenaine Sophifters haue foohfhly dreamed, giuc
the firft degree to the loue of our felues, and the fecond to charity,but
rather that afledion of loue which we do all naturally draw to our fel-
Crr. ucs he giueth away vnto other, wherupony Apoftlc fayth,that Cha-
hS' rity feketh not her owne. And their reafo is not to be cflemed worth
a heare that y thmg ruled is euer inferiour to his Rule.For God doth
not make the loue of our felues a rule whcreunto charity towarde o-
thcr fhould be fubied, but whereas by peruerfnes of nature,y afFedio
of lout was wont lo reft m our felues , he ftieweth that now it ou^hc
to be elfewhcre fpred abroad, that we fhould with no lefle chcrefull-
neflejferuentnefle, & carefulneffe be ready to do good to our neigh-
bour than to our felucs.
55 Now fich Chrift hath flicwed in the parable of the Samaritane
ucio. that vnder the name of Neighbour cuery man is cotaincd be he ne-
<S' uer fo ftraunge vnto vsuhcrc is no caufe why we (houlde reftraine the
commaundemcnt of loue within the boudesofour owncfrendfhips
and acquaintances. I deny not that the nerer that any man is vnto vs,
the more familiarly be i$ to be holden with our endeuours to do him
good.Forfothe order of humanity rcquireth,that fo many mo due-
ties of fricndfiiippe men (houlde communicate together, as they arc
bound together with ftreighter bonds of kinred,famiharity or neigh-
bourhoode,& that without any offcnfe of God, by whofe prouidencc
we are in a manner driucn therunto. But I fay that all makinde with-
out exception is to be embraced with one afTedion of charity: & that
in this bchalfe is no difference of Barbarous or Grecian,of worthy or
TOworthy, of friend or foe, bccaufe ihcy are to be confidercd in God
and
GodthcRcdcmer. Lib.2. ' i<?3
8c not in themfelucsrfrom which coniidcraiion when we turnc away,
it is nomaruellifwcbe entangled with many crrours. Wherefore if
wc will kecpe the true trade of louing,wc muft not turne our eyes va-
to man, the fight of whom would oftcr enforce vs to hate tha to lauc,
but vnto God which comaundeth that the loue which we offer him,
be poured abroadc amongc all men- that this be a perpetuall founda-
tion, that whatfoeucr the man be , yet he ought to be loucd bccaufc
Godisloued.
56 Wherforc it was a moft peftilcnt cither ignorace or malicejthat
the Schoolcmcnofthcfe commaundemcntes,touchinge not delirins;
of reuengement,and louing our cnemics,which in the olde time both
were giuen to the lewes and at the fame time were commonly giucn
to all ChriftianSjhaue made Counccls which it is in our liberty to o-
beyjOr not obey. And the ncceffary obeying of them,thcy haue po-
rted ouer to Mokes which were though but in this one point forfoth
more righteous tha fimple Chriftians,that they willingly bound them
fclues to kepc the Counccls. And they render a rcafon why rhey re-
cciue them not for lawes,for that they feme too burdenous & heauy,
fpecially for Chriftians that arc vnder the law of grace. So dare they
prefume to repcll the eternall law of God touching the louing of our
neighbours?Is there any fuch difference in any leafe of the law?& are
not therein rather cche where founde commaundementes that da
moft feucrcly require of vs to loue our enemies? For what manner of
faying is that,where we are commaunded tofeedc our enemy whe he
is hungry ? to fet into the right way his Oxen or Afles ftrayingout of Pro. 2
the way,or to cafe tlicm when they faint vnder their burden? Shall we *».
do good to his beaftcs for his fake without any good wil to himfelf^? ^'^"•^
Whst?is not the word of the Lord euerlaftinge: Leaue vengeance to ^'
me, and I will requite it? Which alfo is fpoken more plainely at large j^ ^
in an other place.Scke not vengeancc,neither be mmdeful of the iniu- j j. '
ry of thy Citizens. Either let them blot thefe things out of the law,or Leu.i
let them acknowledge that the Lord was a lawmaker, and not lyingly *^ •
faine that he was a ccuncell giuer.
$7 And what I pray you meane thefe things that they hauc prc-
fumed to mocke withallin their vnfauory glo(e?Louc your enemies, j^j,jj
do good to them that hate yoUjpray for the that perfccute you, bleffe 44,
them that curfe you,that ye may be the childrc of your father which
is inhcauen.Who cannot hearereafon withChryfoftome,that by fo ^ib d
neceffary a caufe it plainely appeareth that they are np exhortations comp
but commaundementes? What remaineth more when we be blotted <Sion
put of the numbrc of the children of God? But by theif opinion,only ^^'^^
X iij.
lO.
Cap. 8. Of the knowledge of
Menkes ihall be the children of the heaucnly father, they onely ftiatl
be bolde to call vpon God their Father:what{haU the Church do irf
the mcane fcafon ? it (hall by like nght be fent away to the Genciis 8c
fat. 5. p^5i,c3ns.For Chrift fayih : If ye be friendely to your friendes,what
*• fauour lookc you tor iherbyPdo iioty Gentiles & publicans the fame?
But wc ihall be in good cafe forlbth , if the title of Chriftians belefc
vnto vs,and the inheritaunce of the kingdome of heauen taken away
from vs. And nolcfle ftron^ is Auguftines argument. When (faith he)
tlic Lord torbiddeth to commit fornication, he nolelfe forbiddeth to
touch the wife of thine enemy tha of thy ftiend.Whcn he forbiddeth
^^ theftjhc giueth leaue to fteale nothijig at all,cither fro thy friendc or
from thine enemy. But theretwo,no£ to fteaie,& not to commit for-
nication, Pju!e bringeth wuhin the compaflc of rhe rule ofloue,yea
& teachcch that they arc contained vndcr this c6maundcmcnt,Thou
fhalc louc thy neighbour as thy feUcTherforceiiher Paul muft hauc
bin a falfc expofitour of the lawc.or it neccfTanly foUoweth hereby,
that oar enemies ought alio to be loued,euen by commaundement,
hke 3S oui f.irndes Thtrfore ihcy do tiuely bewray themfclues to be
the children of Satan,that do fo hccntioufly (liake of the comon yoke
of the children of God^ It is to be douted, whether they haue publi-
fhed this dodrine with more grofle dulnes or (hamelefnes. For there
are none of the olde wryters that do not pronounce as of a thing cer-
tamcjthat thefe are mere coniiaundcmentes. And that euen in Grego»
rics age it was not douted of,3ppearetii by his owne affirmati6,tor he
vvivhout coniroucrfie takcth them for commaundcmenies. And hov»
foolifhly do they reafonPThey fay y they are to weighty a burden for
Chriftias.As thoughthere could bcdeuifed any thing more weighty,
thin to loue God with all our heart , with all our foulc , yvith all our
ftregth. In coparifon of this law any thing may be copied cafy, whe-
ther it be to loue our enemy , or to lay away all defirc of reuenge out
ofourminde.Indede all things archie & hard to our weakene$ euen
the leait title of the lawelt is the Lord in whom we vfe ftrength Let
him giue what he commaundcrh,&commaund what he wii.Chriftian
men to be vnder the law of grace,is not vnbridledly to wander with-
out lawjbut to be grafTcd in Chrift,by whofe grace they arc free frpm
the curfe of the law , and by whofe fpirite they haue a law wrytten in
their heartes.This grace Paulc vnpropeily called a law , alludingc to
the law of God againft which he did fet it in comparifon. But thcfc
m en do in the name of the law,difpute vpon a matter of nothing.
58 Of like forte it is, that they called Vcniall finnc, both fecrctc
Yngodlmeffc chat is againft the Brft table , andalfb the diredtranf-
greC*
GodthcRedemcr. Lib.2, 1^4
greflfingc of the laft commaundement. For they define it thus, that it
is a defire without adurfcd afTent, which rcfteth not long in the heart.
But I fay , that it can not come at all into the heart , but by want of
thofe things that are required in the law. We forbid to hauc Orange
gods.When the minde fhaken with the engines of didruil , looketh
about elfe where: whe it is touched with a foden defire to rcmouchcr
blcfTedncfle fome other way : whenfe come thefe motions,ahhough
they quickelyyanifli away ,but of this,that there is fome thing in the
fbule empty ,to recciuc fuch tentations? And to the cndc not to draw
out this argunvet to greater length, there is a commaundcmenc giuc
to loue God with all our heart,witb all our mindc,wich all our foule:
if then all the powers of our foule be not bent to the loue of God,wc
hauc already departed from the obedience of the iaWjBecaufe the c-
nemies that do tlierein ariijb againll his kingdome , and interrupt hit
decrceSjdo proue that God hath not his throne wei ibbliflied in our
conference. As for the laft commaundement,we ijaue already fhevvcd
that it properly belongeth hereunto. Hath any delire of minde pric-
ked vs 5 we are already gilty of couetinge , and therewithal! are made
tranfgreflbrs of the law. Becaufe the Lord doth forbid vs, not only to
purpofe & pradifc any thing that may be to an others lofle, but alio
to be pricked & fwell with couetingit. Bur the curfc of God doth aU
way hang ouer the tranfgreffioof the law.We can not therfore proue
cuen the very leaft defires free from iudgement of death. In weyins;e
of finnes (faith Auguftine)let vs not bring falfe balances to wey what tf. j.tj;
we lift and how we lift at our of ne pleafure, fayinguhis is heauy,and ha^'Co
this is light. But let vs bring Gods balace out of the holy Scriptures, ^'^^ }^o
as out of the Lordes treaforie , and let vs therein wey what is heauy; "^^''t*
rather let rs not wey , but reknowledge thinges ah'eady weyed by the ^^^'^'
Lorde. But what fayth the Scripture ? Truely when Paule fayth that
the rewardc of finne is death, he (ht weih that he knew not this ftin -
kinge diftindion . Sith we are to much enclined to hypocrifie , thif
cherifbmct therof ought not to hauc bin added to flatter our flouth-
full confciences.
59 I would to God , they would confidcr whaty faying of Chrift
incaneth:Hc that tranfgreffeth one of the leaft of thefe commaundc^ ^at. j,
mentes,& tcacheth men fo, (halbe comptcd none in the kingdom of i^,
heaue. Are not theyof that fort,wIicn they dare fo extenuate the traf-
greffion of the law,as if it were not worthy of death? but they ought
to hauc confidered, not only what is comaunded,but what he i$ that
comaundeth , becauie his authority is diminifhed in euery tranfgrel^
(ion , howc litlc fo^ucr it be, of the lawc that he hath giucn in conv
X iiij.
Cap.p, Of the knowledge of
maundcment . Is it a fmall matter with them , that Gods tnaicfty be
offended in any thingc ? Moreouer if God hath declared his will in
the lawc, whatfocucr is contrary to the lawe , difpleafeth him. Will
they imagine the wrath of God to be fo difarmed , that punifhmcnc
of death {hall not foorwith follow vpon thctii?And he himfelfe hath
pronounced it plajnely , if they would rather finde in their heartes
to hcarc his voyce, than to trouble the cleare trueth with their vnfa-
I»c.i8. uory futtelties ofargumct.The roule(rayih he)that finneth,the fame
J°* fhall dye. Againe , which I euen now alleaged : The reward of (innc
' 'is death. But albeit they graunt it to be a Hnne, becaufe they can not
denie it : yet they ftand ftiffe in this, that it is no deadly finne. But firh
they haue hitherto too much borne with their ownc madneflfe , lettc
them yet at length Icarne ro waxe wifer . But if they continue in do-
tagCjWe will bid them farewcllrand let the children of God Icam this,
that all finne is deadly, becaufe it is a rebellion againft the will of
God,which of nccelBry prouoketh his wrath , becaufe it is a breach
of the law, vpon which the iudgemet of God js pronounced without
exception : and that the finncs of the holy ones arc vcniall or pardo-
nable, not of their ownc nature,but becaufe they obtaync pardon by
the mercy of God.
The ix. Chapter,
Thttt Chri^f4hhm^h he vvm knovvtn ta the It wet vnder the /<«v v,
j/tt was deiiUercd only by the Gt>fp*U» >
BEcaufc it pk'afcd God in iheHlde time not vainely by <Jxpia-
{ions and factifices to declare himfclfe a Father, and not in
vainC h«4<d confccratc a chofen people to himftlfe: eucn then
without dout hs was knowen in the fame image , wherein he
4al 4.a nowc appearerh to vs withf^ll brightnefle. Therefore Malachie,af-
cer that he had bidden the lewetf *o take hccde to the law of Mofc*,
and to continue.in ftudy therof,(becai:r^ after his death there fhould
eomc a certainc interruptio of the office of the Prop hetes) did forth-
with declare , that there {houlde arifc a fonne of righteoufncffe . In
which wordes he teachcth , that the law auaUeth to this purpofe to
hold y godly in expe«flation of Chrift to come:but yet that there was
much more Ught to be hoped for,i^hen he (hould be come in deede.
■Pec.i. Pqj, jI^-j rgafon jQth Peter fay , that the Prophetes did make fearch ,
and dihgently enquire , of the faluation that is now opened by the
Gofpell: & that it was reuelcd vnto them, that they fhould minifter,
not iothemfclues,nor totheir owne age but vnto vs,thofe things thai
are declared by the Gofpell. Not chat cheir dodrine was vnproHtable
to
GodthcRedemer. Lib.2. 16^
to the people in oldc time , or nothing auailcd tlicmfelues : but by-
caufe they enioyednotthc treafure which God fent vnto vs by their
hand For at this day the grace whereof they tclhiied, is famihar!y let
before our eyes. And wheras they did but alulc fippe of it , there is
otfrcd vnto vs a more plennfull cnioying thereof. Therefore Chrift
himfelfe, which affirmcth that he had witncfl'e borne him by Mofes,
yet extoUeth the meafure of grace whereby we excell the lewes. For
fpeaking to the Difciplcs , he faid :Blefled are the eyes that fee that lohn
which ye fee,& blefl'ed are the eares that heare that which ye hcare. 4^
For many kinges and Prophetes haue wifhed it, and hauenotobtei- ^^^'^
tied it.This is no fmall commendation of the reuehng of the Gofpeli, Luc.i
that God preferred vs before the holy fathers that excelled in rare »j.
godhnciFe . With which fentcncc that other place difagrceih not,
where it is faid , that Abraham fawe the day of Chrift, and reioyfed. ^^^^
For tnough the light of a thing farre diilant v/js fomewhat ddrke,yct '^*
he wanted nothing to the aflurance of good hope. And chcnfc came
that ioye which accompanied the holy Prophet , eucn to his death.
And that faying of lohn Baptift, No man hath fcen God at any time, lohn,
the only begotten that is in the bo Tome of the father , hath declared * ^:
him vnto vSjdorh not exclude the godly which had ben dead before
him, from thcfelowfhip of the vnderftandingand light thatftimcth
in the perfone of Chrift. Butcomparing their eftate with ourcs, he
tcacheth that thofe mifteries,which they faw but darkely vndcr ftiad-
dowesjare manifcft to vs:as the author of ihe epiftle to the Hebrewes ^t^^'^
•doth well fct out , faying, that God diuerfly and many wayes fpakc in
olde time by the Prophets,but now by his beloued Sonne, Although
thcrforc that only begotten one, which is at this day to vs the bright-
nefle of the glory, and the point of the fubftance of God the father,
was m olde time knowen to the lewes , as we haue in an other place
alleaged out of Pauie,ihat he was the guide of the oldc deliuerance:
yet is it true,which the fame Paul els where teacheth,that God which ^
commaunded the light to ftiinc out of darkencfte, hath nowe fhined ^ °''
Vpon our heartes to let forth the knowledge of the glorie of God in
tlic hcc of lefus Chrift:bycaufe when he appered m this his image,hc
did in a maner make himfelfe vifiblc , in comparifon of the darke and
fhadowifli forme that had ben of him before. And fo much the more
fowleand deteftablc is their vnihankcfulncfle and perucrfnefle , that
arc here fo blinde at midde day. And therefore Paule faith, that their
fnindes are darkened by Satan, that they ftioulde not fee the glorie of
Chrift fhining in the Gofpeli, though there be no veilc fee betwene
them and ic
Cap. p. Of the knowledge of
1 Now I take the GofpcU for the clecre diidofing of the myfte?
.ttm.4 rie of Chnft.I graunc truely,th3t in that refpeiS: that Paule calleth the
•• GofpcU the dodrine of faith, all the promifes that we here and there
finde in the lawc,concerning the free forgcucnefTc of finnesjwhereby
God reconciieth men to hinifelfe, are accompted partes therof. For
he compareth faith agamft thcfe terrors , wherewith the confcicncc
fhould be troubled and vexed,if faluation were to be fought by wor-
kes. Wherevpon foUoweth , that in taking the name of the GofpeU
largely , there arc comeined vnder it all the teftimonics that God in
oldc time gaue to his fathers , of the mercie and fatherly fauour . But
in the more excellent fignification of it , I fay it is applied to the pu*
bhfhing of the grace geuen in Chrift. And that meaning is not onel/
receyued by common vfe , but alfo hangeth vpon the authoritie of
^.^j . Chrift and the Apoftlts . Wherevpon this is proprcly afcribed vnto
f. him,thac he preached the Goipell of the kingdome. And Marke ma*
A2r.i.i kcth his preface in thismaner, The beginning of the GofpcU of
lefus Chrift . And there is no neede to gather places to proue a thing
.i' ' fufficiently knowenChrift therfore by his comming hath made clecre
.Tim.i the Ufe and iramorcalitie by the GofpeU. By which wordcs Paule
o- nieaneth , not that the fathers were drowned in darkcnelTe of death*
vntiU the fonne of God did put on flcih : but clayming this preroga*
tiuc of honour to the GofpcU, he teacheththatit is a ncwc and vn*
wonted kmde of mcflage , wherby God performed thofe thingcs that
he had promifed, that the truth of his promifes (houldc be fulfiUed in
the perfone of the Sonne. For although the faithful haue alway found
by experienccjthatfame faying of Paule to be true, that in Chrift arc
all the promifes , yea and Amen , bycaufe they were fealed in their
heartes : yet bycaufe he hath accomplifhed aU partes of our faluation
in his flefli , therefore that felfe Ituely deliuering of the thingcs right-
fully obteined a newe and fingular title of praife. Whervpon conieth
lof.n.i. that faying of ChriftrHcrcaftcr yc (hall fee the heauens open,and the
J^* Angels of God afccnding and dcfcending vpon the fonne of man.For
though he feeme to haue relation vnto ihc ladder fhewed in a vifion
to the Patriarch lacob : yet he fetteth out the exceUencic of his com-
ming by this marke , that he opened the gate of heauen to aU men,
that the entrie thereof maie ftand familiarly open loaU men.
3 But yet we mutt take hede of the dcuelilh imagination of Scf
uettus, which when he gocth about, or at leaft faineth that he gocth
about , to cxtoll the greatneflc of the grace of Chrift , vtierly abo-
lifheth the promifes , as if they were ended together with the lawc.
He laycth for him, that by the faith of the GofpcU there is brought
vni9
God the Redemcr. Lib.2 . 1 66
vnto vs the accomplilhmet of all the promifcsias though there were
no diflpeicnce betwenc vs and Chrift.l didindeedc euen nowe declare
that Chrift Icftc nothing vnperfourmed of the whole fumme of our
faluattoncbut it is wrongfully gathered thereupoii,that we do already
cniojr the benefices purchaced by him,as though that faying of Paulc
vvere falfe, that our faluation is hidde in hope* 1 graunt in deede, that
we by bcleuing in Chrift, do alfo palTe from death to life : But in the
i»eane feafon we muft holde this faying of lohn-, that although we
knowe we be the children of God,ycc it hath not as yet appearcd,till
we fhalbe like vnto him : that is , till we ihall fee him fuche as he is.
Therefore although Chrift oft'srvntovs in bisGofpell prefentful-
licfte of fpiritual good thinges,yct the enioying therof lieth ftil hidde
vndcrthe keping of hope , till being vnclothcd of the corruptible
flefli, we be transfigured into the glorie of him that goeth before vs.
In the meane time the holy Ghofl biddcth vs to refte vpon the pro-
mifes , whofe authorise ou^ht with vs to put to filence all the bar-
kinges of that filthy dogge. For as Paule witneireth, godlinefle hath i.Tim.
a promife as well of the life to come,3S of the life pre(ent. For which 4 8.
reafonheboafieththathe is an Apoftleof Chrift, according to the *Tim.i
promife of life that is in him. And in an othtr place he putteth vs in ** ^^''^
mindcjthat we haue the fame promsfes, which in the olde time were
geuen to the holy men. Finally, he fetteth this for the fumme of feli-
citie , chat we are fealed vp with the holy fpinrc of promife , but yet
we do no otherwife enioy Chrift , but fo farre as we embrace him
clothed with his promifes.Wherby it comcth to paire,that he in dede
dwclleth in our heartes , and yet we wander m iourney abrodc from
himrbycaufe we walke by faith & not by fight. And thefe two thinges
do not ill agree together: that we poflefle in Chrift all that pertcincth
to the perfedion of thcheauenly life: and yet that faith is a behol-
ding of good thinges that arc not fecne. Onely there isadifterenct
to be noted in the nature or qualitie of the promifes : bycaufc the
Gofpell (heweth with her finger that thing , whichc the lawc did
fhadow vnder figures.
4 And hereby alfo is their errour conuinced , whichc do neuer
otherwife compare the lawe with the Gofpell , but as they compare
the merites of workes with the free imputation of righteoufnefVc.
Although indecdethiscomparifonofcontrariesbenot toberciec-
tcd: bycaufc Pajjle doth oftentimes vnderftand by the name oi the
law,a rule toliue rightcoufly,wherin God rcquireth of vs,that which
is his,notgcuing vs any hope of lifc.vnlefte we in all pointesobey it:
and on the other fide adding acurfeifwc do neuer folitlc fwarae
Cap,
.^. Of the knowledge of
from It : that is in fuch places as he difputeth,the wcdo freely plea(<*
God,and are by pardon reckened righteous,bycaufe the obferuatioti
of the lawe,wherunto the rewarde is promifcd,is no where founde.
Therefore Paule doth fitly make the righteoufnefTe of the lawc and
of the Gofpell , contrane the one to the other . But the Gofpell did
not Co fucccde in place of the whole la we , that it {houlde bring any
diuers meane of faluation , but rather to cpnfirme and proue to be of
. force, what fo euer the la we had promifed, and to ioine the body to
the fiiadowes.For when Chnft faich,that the lawe and the Prophets
were vntill lohn ; he maketh not the fathers fubied to the curfc,
which the bond fcruantes of the lawe can hot cfcaperbut rather only
that they were inftruded with cti taine rudimcntes, fo as they ftayc4
a great way beeneath the heigth of the dodrine of the GolpclL
Rom. I. Therefore Paulc calhng the Gofpell the power of God, to faluation
»^. CO euery beleuer, by and by addeth, that it hath witncflTw of the lawe
and the Prophetcs.But in the ende of the fame Epiftle,although he
fliewe that tne title of praife of lefus Chrift is the reuelation of the
mifterie kept fecret ineuerlafting times: yet he dothqualifie chat
iayingjwith adding an cxpofition, teaching that he is openly (hewed
by the writinges of the Prophets. Whcrupon we gather>that when
We arc to entreate of the whole lawe,the Gofpell diftereth from the
lawe onely in refped of the plaincdiclofing thereof. But yet for the
ineftimable flowing ftore of grace, which hath ben layed open for v$
in Chnft , it is not without caufe faid, that at his coming the heauenly
kingdome of God was crcdcd in earth.
^ , Now betwenc the lawc and the Gofpell came lohn, which had
an office that was meane andofaffinitie to them both'. For though
when he called Chrift the lambe of God, and the fj|crifice for the
cleanfing of finnes, hefhewcd forth the fummeof the Gofpell : yet
bycaufe he did not exprefle that fame incoparable ftregth and glorie,
^ which at length appcred in his rcfurredion, therefore Chrift fayeth,
j^^^'**thathewasnotegalto the Apoftlcs. For fodothofcwordcs of his
meane ; that though lohn excell among the fonnes of women.yet he
that is leaft in the kingdome of heauen , is greater than he . Bycaufe
he doeth not there commend the perfoncs of men , but after he had
preferred Tohn before all the Prophetes,he auaunceth the preaching
of the Gofpell to the hieft degree; which preaching we fee in an
Ibhn.i. other place fignified by the kingdome of heauen . But whereas lohn
*J' himfdfe doth aunfwere that he is but a voice , as though he were in-
fcriour to the Prophetes, he doth not that for faincd humilities fakej
but meancth to teach that the propre office of the Embaftadour was
God the Rcdcmer. Lib.2 . 1 6y
iiot committed to him , but that he oncly exccutcth the oflRcc of an
apparitor : as it was forefpokcn by Malachic : Beholcfc , 1 fcnde Elias MaL4.5
the prophet , before that the great and terrible day of the Lorde do
come. And ttutly he did nothing els in the whole courfc of his mmi-
fterie , but endeuour to get difciplcs to Chrift : as alfo Efaie proucth,
that this was enioyned him from God. And in this fcnfe Chrifl is cal-
led a candell burning and fliining,bycaufe the broadc day had not yet ^o^o-J*
appeared. And yet this is no let, but that he may be reckened among ^^'
the publi(hers of the Gofpel,likc as he vkd the fame Baptirmc>which
was afterwarde dcUuered to the Apoftles.But that which he begannc,
was not fulfilled but by the Apoillcs , with free preceding , after liiac
Chrift was taken vp from them into the heauenly gloric.
The X. Chapter,
of the Ukenejpe oft he olde and ntvve TefiamtnU
BY the thingcs aforfaid it may nowc appearccuidentlyythat att
the men whome from the beginning of the worlde God adop-
ted into the cftate of his people, were with the fame lawc, and
with the bondeofthe fame dodrine> which nowe remaineth
in force among vs,bound in conuenant to him. But bycaufe it is of no
fmail importance that this point be well efiabliHied , I will adioync
vnco it for an additionjiith the fathers were partakers of all one inhc*
ritance with vs,and hoped for all one faluation by the grace of al one
Mediatour, how farre their cftate differed from oures in this fellow-
fiiip. But although the teftimonies that we haue gathered out of the
lawc and the Prophets for proofe therof,do make it plaine that there
was neuer any other rule of religion and godlineflc in the people of
God : yet bycaufe in writers there are oftentimes many thinges fpo-
ken of the difference of the olde and new Teftament, that may make
the reader that is not of very (harp iudgement to be in doubt: there-
fore we fhall rightfully apoint one peculiar place for the better and
more exad difcufting of this matter : Yea and that thing alfo, which
otherwifc Ihoulde haue bene very profitable for vs, is nowe made ne-
ceflarie by that monftruous lofel Seruettus, and by diuerfe other mad
men of the fed of Anabaptiftes,which haue no other opinion of the
people of Ifraell , than as of a hearde of fwine : which they fondcly
faine to haue bene fatted vp by the Lorde here in this earth, without
any hope of heauenly immortalitie . Therefore that we may kcepe
away this peftilcnt errour from godly mindes , and alio to plucke out
of them all doubtes which are wont byandby to arife vpon hearing
mention of the diuerficie betwcne the olde and newe Tcftamentilcc
Cap.i o. Of the knowledge of
v$ by the way looke , what they haue in them hke , and what vnlikc
one to the other : what coiienant the Lorde made with the Ifraelites
tn the olde time before the coming of Chrift, and what couenant he
hath nowc made with vs fins Chrift hath bene openly (hewed.
2 And both thefe pointes may be made plaine with one worde.
The couenat of all the fathers fo differcth nothing from ours in fub-
Oance and in the matter it fclfe, that it is altogether one and the feife
fame : but the miniftration is diuers . But bycaufe o{ fo great fhort-
nelTe no man were able to attaine a certaine vnderftanding , v/e muft
nccdes proccede on with a longer declaration if we mcane to proHt
any thing at all. But m fhc wing how they are like or rather all one , it
(lialbe fuperfluous to difcourfe againe of new vpo all the fpeciall par-
ticulars that haue already bene declared : and it (lialbe out of feafon
to mingle thofe thinges together that remaine yet to be fpoken in
other places. Here we muft chiefly reft vpon three principal) pointes:
Firfti thatweholde, that carnall weahh and felicitie was not the
markc apomted to thelewcsioafpirevnto, but that they were by
adoption chofen vnto the hope of immortalitie:and that the truth of
this adoption was certainly aflured vnto them both by oracles,and by
thclawe,& by theprophecies.Secondarily,thatthe couenant where-
by they were ioyncd to^he Lord , was vpholden not by any meritcs
of theircSjbut by the onely mercie of God that called them. Thirdly,
that they both had and knew Chrift the mediatour, by whome they
(houlde both be ioyncd to God and enioie his promifes . Of which
pointes, bycaufe the fecond paradueture is not yet fufficieiiy knowcn,
it (lull m place apointed for it be declared at large. For we (hall con-
firme by many and clcere tcftimonies of the Prophetes, that it was of
his owne meere goodneffe and tender fauour,"what fo euer good the
Lord at any time did,and promifed to the people of IfratU.The third
alfo hath already had here and there fome plaine declarations of it,
and wc haue not left the firft altogether vntouchcd.
J Therefore in fetting out of this point,bycaufe it moft fpecially
bclongeth to this prefent marter.and for that they make vs moft con-
irouer (ic about it, we will cmpioie the more earneft trauailc : but yet
Co that if there wante yet any thing cf the explication of the other , it
may be by the way fuppliedjOr in conucnient place be added.Trucly
ll«m.i.theApoftletaketh away all doubt of them all, when he faith, that
>. God the Father long before by the Prophetes in the holy Scriptures
promifed the Gofpeil, which he aftcrwardc publi(hed according to
Horn.;, the time apoinred. AgninejthattherighteoufnclTcof faith which is
>». laiight by the GofpcU it fclfe, hath wimeflc of the lawc and the Pro-
phetes,
God the Rcdcmer. Lib.2. i^
i^tictcs.For the Gofpell doth not holdc the hcartes of men in the ioy
of this prefent life, but hfceth them vp to the hope ofimmortalitic:
doth not fatten them to earthly dchtes,but preaching to them a hope
layed vp in heauen,doth in a manner tranfport them thethcr. For thus
he dehncfh in an other place. Sins that ye beleeued the Gofpell , ye Ephe.i
are fealed vp with the holy Spirite of promife, which is the earncft of 1 1.
our inhcritauncc , for the redemption of the poflellion purchaced.
Againc, we haue heard of your faith in Chrift lefu, and of your cha- ^^^^^
riiie towarde the holy ones , for the hopes fake that is iaycd vp for
you in hcaue,wherof ye haue heard by the true fpcech of the Gofpel.
Againc:He hath called vs by the Gofpel to the partaking of the gloric i.Thei!
of our lorde Icfus Chrift. Wherefore it is called , both the wordc of *•**♦•
faluation^and the power of God to faue the faithful,and thekingdome
of heauen. Now if the dodrine of the Gofpell be fpirituall,and opc-
neth the entrie to the poffeflio of an incorruptible life.lct vs not thmke
that they co whomc it was promifed and declared , did pafle ouer and
ncglcd the care of their fouIe,& lie dully like bcaftcs in fceking plea-
fures of the body . Neither let any man here cauill that the promifcs
which are fealed in the law and the Prophctes,c6ceming the Gofpel,
were ordemcd for the new people. For within a little after that which
he fpake of the GofpeU promifed in the lawe , he addeth, that all the
thinges that the law conteineth, are without doubt properly direct d
to them that are vnder the lawe. I grauni in dcede it is in an other ar-
gument.But he was not fo forgetfull,ihat when he had ones faid that ^**™ 1
all the thinges which the lawe conteineih belong to the Icwes,he did ^'
not remember what in a fewc verfes before he had affirmed of the
Gofpell promifed in the lawe . Wherefore the Apoftle fheweth moft
plainly,that the old Teftamet chiefly tended to the life to come,wheii
he faith,that vnder it are conteincd the promifes of the GofpelL
4 By the fame rcafon followeth,both that it ftoode vpon the free
mercie of God, and alio was confirmed by the meane or Chnft. Foe
the very preaching of the Gofpell pronounceth no other thing , but
that finners are iuftified by ihe fatherly kindene fle of God , without
their owne dcfcruingiand the whole fumme therof is fulfilled in Chrift,
Who then dare make the lewes without Clirift, withwhomewe
heare that the couenant of the Gofpell was made, whereof Chrift is
the only foundation? Who dare make them ftrangcrs from the bene-
fice of free faluation ,to whome we heare that the dodrincof the
righteoufnefle of faith was minjftred^But, that we difputc not longc
of an euidet matter, we haue a notable fentcncc of the Lord. Abrahal<»'»'*«^'
reioyfcd that he might fee my day , he fa we it and was glad« And cIk ^ ^*
Cap.io, .*:x Ofthe knowledge of
fame thing whiche Chrid there teftifieth of Abraham , the Apoftle
(hcweth that it was vniucrfall in the faithful! people , when he faith,
!eb.i 5 that Chrift abiUeih, yefterday, this day,ancl for euer . For he fpeaketh
not there only of the eternal godhed of Chriftjbutalfo of his power,
which was continually opened CO the faithfull. Wherefore both the
ivkc.j. bleffed Virgin and Zacharie in their fonges>do fay^ that the faluation
4. and reueled in Chrift, is the performance of the proif)ifes,which God in
» *" oldc time had made to Abraham and the Patriarches. If the Lordc in
geuing his Chrift,difcharged his olde ochc, ic can not be faid but that
the cnde thcrof was alway in Chrift,and euerlafting life.
f Yea and the Apoftle doth make the Ilrachtes egall with vs, not
onely in the grace of the coucnanr, but alfo.in (ignification of Sacra-^
mentes. For meaning by examples of puniftimcntes , wherewith the
Scripture reciteth that they were correfted in the oldc time, to make
the Corinthians afraide,that they flioulde not runne into the like of-
fcnfes, he bcginneth with this preface, that there is no caufe why we
ihoulde chalcngc any prerogatiue vnto our (elues,co dehuer vs from
the vengeance of God which they fufteined , for afmuch as the Lord
did not oncly graunt vnto them the fame bencfites.but he hath glori-
oufly fet forth his grace among them with the fame tokens : As if he
fhoulde haue fayd : If ye iruft that ye be out of pen! , bycaufc both
Baptifme wherewith ye be marked,and the Supper which ye daily rer
ceyue, haue excellent promifes, and in the meane time defpifing the
goodnefte of God,ye are licetioufly wanton:Know yc,that the lewes
alfo were not without fuch (acramcntes, againft whome yet the Lord
did moft fcuercly put his iudgementes in execution.Thcy were Bap-
tized in palling ouer the Sea,and in the doude wherewith they were
defended from the burning heate of the fonne. They fay, that that
fame palfagc was a carnall Baptifme > which after a pertaine propor-
tion aunfwercth to our fpirituall Baptifme . But if that were i\llowed
true,the Apoftles argument coulde not procede, which meaneth here
to haue this taken away from the Chriftias,that they thinke that they
cxcell V lewes by the prerogatiue of Baptifme. Neither is that which
byandby after foUowcth , fubied to this cauillation: that they did
cate the fame fpirituall meate that we eate, and dronke the fame fpi-
rituall drinkc.which he expoundeth to be Chrift.
6 To ouerthrow this fentence of Paule,they obiede that which
Chrift filth : Your fathers did eate Manna in the wildernefre>and arc
ohn.<J. jgjj^j . \y^ p[^jf eateth my flefti, fhall not die for euer. Which two pla-
ces are very eafily made to agree together.Thc Lord>bycaufe he then
talked to hearers that fought onely to be Hlledwith fuodc of their
belly, ^
God the Redemcr. Lib.2. 16^
belly , but cared not for the meate of the foule , tempered his talkc
fomewhat to their capacitie , but fpecially he frameth the compari-
fon of Manna and of his body according to their fcnfe.They required
that he , to gcttc himfelfc fomc credite , woulde approuc his power
With doing fome fuch miracle, as Mofcs did in the wildernefle,when
he obteincd Manna from Hcaucn.Bwt in Manna they conceyued no-
thing but the rcmcdie of carnall hunger", wherewith the people vva$
then vexed : but they pcarced not to that hier miftcrie which Paule
hath refped vnto 2 Chnft iherefore,to fhe w how much greater a bc-
ncfite they ought to looke for at his hande,than that which they re*
ported that Mofes did bcftow vpon their fathers , frameth this com-
parifon i If it were a great miracle in your opinion, and woi thy to be
remembred, that the Lord by Mofes miniftred foodefrom Heauen
to his people , to fuftcinc them for a fmall timc,that they (houlde not
pcrilTi for hunger in ihe wilderneflc : gather heicby how much more
excellent is themcatc that geUcthimmortahtie.We fee why the Lord
parted ouer that thing which was principall in Manna, and fpake only
of the bafeft proht of it: eueri bycaufe the lewcs as it wtrc of purpolc
to reprochc him, did cafte Mofes in his teeth, which fuccored the ne-
ccflicie of the people with remedie of Manna : he aunfwcred that he
is the miniftcr of a much hier grace, in coparifon wherof, the carnall
feding of the people , which atone they fo much eftcemed , ought of
righte'to be nothing regarded . But Paule , bycaufe he knew that the
Lorde when he rained Manna from heauen , did not onely poure it
downe for the feding of their belly , but aifo did diftribute it for a
fpirituall myfterie, to be a figure of the fpirituallquickningthaiis
had in Chrift,did not neglcd that parte that was moft worthy of c6-
{ideration.Whcrfore it certainely and clerely followe<h,that the fam»
promifes of eternall and heuenly life, which now the Lorde vouche-
fauctli tograunt vnto vs,werc not only comunicated vnto the lewes,
but alfo fealed with very fpirituall Sacramentes . Of which matter
Auguftine difputeth largely againft Fauftus the Manichee.
7 But if the readers had rather to haue teftimonies alledged vn-
to them out of the la we and the Prophetes , whereby they may per-
ceiuc that the fpirituall couenant was common alfo to the fathers , as
we heare by Chrift and the Apoftles : I will alfo follow thatdefirc,
and Co much the more willingly , bycaufe by that meane the aduer*
faries fhalbe more furely conuinced, fo that they (hall haue afterwaril
no way to dally' And I will beginne ^ that proofe , which although
I knowc that the Anabaptiftes pride will thinke very fonde and in a
manacr to be laughed at , yet fhall much auatlc with fuch readers as
Clip. I o. ' Of the knovvledgc of
are Willing CO learne and haue their founde wic. And I take it as a
principle confefled, that there is fuch eficduall force of life in the
wordcof God, that whomc To eucr God vouchefaucth to be par-
t .Pet. I. -^'^'^crs therofjit quickenech ihcir foules.For this faying of Peter hath
a J. alvvay ben of. force , that it is the incorruptible fcedc which abideth
Efa. 40. for euer, as he alfo gathereth out of the wordes of Efaie . Nowe Ciih
*• God in the olde tjme bounde the Icwes vnto him with this holy
bondc , it is no doubt that he did alfo feuer them into the hope of
eternall hfe.For when I fay they embraced the worde,which fhoulde
ioine tliem nier to God,I take it for the maner of communicating it:
not that general maner,which is poured abrode throughout thchca-
iien and earth and all the creatures of the worlde , which although it
do quicken all thingcs,euery one after the proportion of theirna*
ture , yet it doth not ddiuer them from neceffitie of corruption : but
I fpeake of this fpeciall maner , whereby the foules of the godly arc
toth lightened vnto the knowledge of God , and in a maner coupled
to him. By this enlightening of the worde,fith Adam, Abel,Noe, A-
braham, and the other fathers deaued vnto God , I fay that it is not
doubtefull that they had an entrie into the immortall kingdome of
God.For it was a founde partaking of God^which can not be without
the benefit of eternail life, . ii
: 8 But if this feeme fonKwhat entangledrgo to,tct vs come to the
very forme of the couenant,which fhal not only fatisfie fobre wittes,
but alfo Ihall fufficiently conuince their ignorance that bcnde them-
letti.atfrelues to fpeake againft it. For God did alway thus couenant with his
■ *• ieruanics : I will be to you a God , and ye Hialbe to me a people . In
which wordes the Prophetes themfelues arc wont to expounde,that
'both hfe and faIuation,and the whole fumme of blefledneflcis com-
pr.i 44. prehended. For Dauid doth not without caufe afcen pronounce, that
> 5' blefled is the people, whofc God is the lorde : ble0ed is the nation,
f lal. 33. yyj^ich he hath chofen to be his inheritance : and that not for earthly
felicities fake, but bycaufe he deliuercth them from death, he prefer-
ueth them for euer , and continually Iheweth them etcmall mereie,
wliome he hath taken to his people : as it is in the other Prophetcy,
Abac I. ^^^^ ^^^ °"^ God, we (hall not dierThc Lorde is our king,our lawc-
, 1. * maker, he fhall fauc vs. Blefled art thou, O Ifraell , bycaule thou art
fcfa. 5 3. faued in the lorde God,But,not to labour ouermuch in a thing needc-
*«• lefle, this admonition is founde echc where in the Prophetes,that we
'*^^* ihall wante nothing towarde all aboundance of good thingcs, and af?
furahcc of fabatton, fo that the Lorde be our God . And rightfully:
For if his face fo fone as it begianetli to (hineps a moil prefenc pledge
of
GodtheHedcmcr. Lib.2. 170
of Valuation , to what man fhall he openly {hew himfelfc for his God,
but chat he will aUb open to him his treafare of faluation ? For he is
our God with this condition, to dwell in the middeft o{ vs : as he te- ^'^' *
ftified by Mofes. But fuch prcfcncc can not be obteined, but that life * "
muft be alfo together had in poflcffion with it . And although there
were no more cxprelled, yet had cheya promife of fpirituall life
plaine enough in thefe wordcs:! am youiGod.For he did not declare Exo.^
that he wouldc be a God vnto their bodies alone , but principally to 7'
their foules. Butfbulcs vnlefTcihcy be loynedtoGodby righteouf-
ncfl'c remame cftranged ftom him in death. But on the other fide, let
that iovning be prefent,it rtiall bring euerlafting faluation with it.
9 Beiidc that, he did not oncly leftitie that he was to them their
God, but he alfo piomifed that he wouldc be fo all way : to the endc
that their hope not contented with prefent bcr^efites , (houlde be ex-
tended to eternitie.And many fayinges do fhewe,that the fpeaktng in
the future time meant fo much , as where thctaithtuU not oncly in
prefent cuels, but alfo for the time to come , doe confort them felue*
with this^that God will neuer failc them. Now as concerning the fe-
conde part of the promife , he yet more plainely aflbred them of the
blefling of God to be prolonged vnto them beyond the boundes of
this lifcjin faycng:! will be the God of your kcdc after you. For if he ^«"»'
minded to decbre his good will towat de them being dead , in doing '^'
good to their pofteritic , much more woulde his fauour not faile to-
warde themfelues. For God is not like vnto mcnne, which do there- •
fore carry their loue to their frendcs children , bycaufe their power is
interrupted by death, fo that they can not emploie their ftendely:
doinges vponthem towhomethey did beare good will . But God*
whofe bountifulnefTc is not hindered by death j taketh not away
ftom the very dead the frutc of ihs mcrcie , which for their fakes he.p
poureth out into a thoufand generations. Therefore the Lordes will f,^
was by a notable proofe to fette forth vnto them the greatnelTe and
flowing plcntie of his goodncfle which they fhoulde fcele after death,
\yhcn he defcnbed it to be fuch as fliouldc flow ouer into all their po-
fteritic. And the truth of this promife the Lordc did then fcale , and
as it were brought forth the fulfilling of it, when he named himfclfe -
the God of Abraham , Ifaac and lacob , long after their death. For, 5,
what ? had it not been a fondc naming , if they had vtterly perilhed ? Mac. a:
For then had it ben all one, as if he bad faid , I am the God of them » ?•
that arc not. Wherefore the Euangeliftes j-ehcrfe, that with this one ^"'^•**=
argument the Sadduccs were fo drioen to a ftreight,that they coulde
not dcnie that Mofes did tcftifle the refurredtion of the dead^for that :
Y ij.
Cap.io. . Ofthe knowledge of -
5U.33 ihcy had learned by Mofcs, that ail the Saintes were inhishan^c#
Whervpo it was ca(y to gathcr,that they arc not dcftroycd by death,,
whome he that is the ludge ot life and death had reccyued in to his
fauegard,cuftodie,and proredtion.
ID Now (which is the principal point wherevpon this contro-
Uerfic hangcth)Iet vs lookejwhcthcr the faithful themfelues hauc not
ben fo inftrudcd of the Lord, that they perceyued that they fhouldc
haue a better life els where,& fo negledtng this hfcjhad an eie to the
©ther.Firft ihe ftate of hfe that was enioyncd them by God,wasa co»
tinuall cxcrcife, whereby they might be put in minde, that they were
the moft miferahlc of all men,if their happineffc were only in this lifc-
cn. J. Ad3m,moft vnhappy , euen with onely remembrance of the happi*
'• neffe that he had loft , did with paincfull labours hardcly fufteinc hit
ncdincflc , and that he.fiioulde not be prcfled with the curfc of God,
in the onely labours of his handes, euen there receyucd he extreme
forrowc of that whichremained for him to be his comfort . Of his
two fonnes , the one was taken away by the wicked flaughter of his
en.i^. brotheruhc other he had lefte aliueiwhofe fight he worthily dctciled
and abhorred. Abel cruelly murthcrcd in the very floureof his age,
became an example of the wretchednefl'c of men. Noe, while the
en.tf. whole worlde carelefly liued in pleafurc , fpent a good part of his age
*• with great wcrineiTe in bilding the Arke.This thathe efcaped death,
came to pafle by his greater troubles, than if he fhbulde haue died 3
«n.5. hundred deathes. For by fide that the Arke was to him as a graue for
'• tcnnemonethes.ihcre is nothing more vnpleafanc than to be holden
fo longe in manner drowned in dong of bt?afles. When he had paflcd
ouer fo great difEcukieSi he fell into newe matter of griefe , he fav/c-
him felfc fcornedof hisownc fonnc, and was compelled with his
ownc mouth to curfe him,whome by the gr cat bcnefiiof God he had
reccyued fafc from the generall floode. • .•• :
cn.ii jj Abrahamindeedemay be one alone to be compared with*
hundred thoufandjf we contidcr his fairh.Wi^ich is fet forth vnto vs
for the bcft rule of beleuing,of whofc kinred we muft be accompted,
that we may be the children of God. But wlwt more abfurditicis
there, than Abraham to be the father of all the faithfull, and not to
poflefTe fo much as the fmaleft corner amog thi^mrbiit he can not be
throwcn downe out of the number, no nor from' the moft honorable
degree, but that the whole church muft be deftroycd . Now as toiw
ching the expcrieces of his life:When he was firfl called by the com-
maundcmcnt of God,hc was plucked away from his countrcy,hi$ pa-
rentcs and his frendes»in whc^ne men chioke co tie the chiefe fweere-
GodthcRcdemcr. Lib.2. 171
ncflcoflifc; eucn as if God of determined purpolc meant to fpoylc
him of all the pleafurcs of life. Sofoone as he came into chelande
where he was commaunded co dwcll> he was driuen out from thenie
with famine. Thither he fled for fuccour, where to faue himfeife, he
was compelled to deliuer out his wife to be abufcd,which we knowe
not whether it were not more bitter to him tha many deathes. Whc
he was returned into the lande of his owne dwelling , he was driuen
out againe from thenfe with famine. What a felicitie is this,To dwell
in that lande, wh^rin a man muft fo oft be hungry ,yea die for famine
if he runne not away ? And therewithal! he was brought to that nc-
ccflitie with Abimdech ,that: he muft needcs redccme his life with cen.
che loffe of his vvife,while many yeares long he watidred vncertainc- i ».
ly hither and thither, he was compelled by the continuall brawlinges
of his feruantes to put away his nephew , whome he loued as his
ownefonne. Which departing without doubt he dydno otherwifc
take, than if he had fuffred the cutting of one of his limmcs . A lidc
after.he heard that he was carried away captiue by his enemies. Whe-
ther Co euer he wenr,he foundeneiglibours outrageoufly barbarous,
which woulde not fuffer him fo much as to drinke water out of the
Welles that himfeife had digged with great labour. For he would not
haue redeemed the vfe of them at the hand of king Gerar,if he had
not firft ben forbidden. Nowe when he came to oldc age , he faw the
thing which is the moft vnpleafant & biticrtlhatthat age hath^ him-
feife puniflied with hauing no children , till befidc all hope he begate
Ifmaell, whofe birth yet he payed dere for, when he was weried with
the brawling of Sara,asif hein mainteiningtheftubbornneircof his
bondewoman , were himfeife the caufe of the trouble of his houfe-
holde. At length Ifaac was bornc.but vi^ith this condition that his firft
begotten Ifmaell muft , as foifaken , be cruelly cafte out of doores.
When only Ifaac was lefr,in whome the weryed age of the (illy good
man might reft , within a litle after he was commaunded to kill him.
What can mans witdeuife more miferable,than the father to be made
the butcher of his owne fonne ? If 1 faac had dyed of any fickencffe,
who woulde not haue thought the olde man moft miferable,that had
d fonne geuen him in mockeagc,for whome his griefe of want of chil-
dren (hould be doubled ? If he had ben flaineby fome'ftraunger, the
vnhappinefie of the thing would haue much encreafed his miferie.But
this paflcth all examples afmifcrie, to haue him (lainewith his fa-
thers owne hand. Finally, he was in all the whole courfe of his life Co
toiTcd and vexed, as if a man would in a table paint out an example of
4 mif^rabb life, he coulde ^e none atorc £t,than this of Abraham*
- y ii>
Cap. 10. - Of the knowledge of
And ice noe man obicft that he was not altogether vnhappy,forthat
he at lengdi profperoufly efcapcd from (6 many and Co great tcm*
peftcs.For we can not fay tliat he liucih a blelTedlifcwhich for along
fpacc together painefully wcarcth out o£ infinite troubles , but hini
that without feeling of euils,quictly enioycth prefent good thmgcs.
iz Ifaac that was lefTc troubled with cuillcs ,*yct fcarce euer toke
any taft of fwcetcncfle . He alfo felt the fame vexations , that do not
fuffer a manne to be.blefTcd in the earth . Famine chaced him out of
cn.i6 the lande of Clianaan : he had his wife violently plucked away from
5* his bofome : his neighbours oft troubled him, and by all meanes opt-
reircd him', fo that he was faine to ftciueibr his water : at home ia
en. 2 8
prelk
niso\
en
wne houfe , he fuffrcd much troublefomnefre by bis children!
wiues, he was gretucd with difagreementes of his ronnei,and couldc
not remedie that fo great a mifchiefc , but by the banilhment of him
v/home he hadblellpd^ But as for lacob , he isnothing els but a no-
en.aS table example of extreme infelicities He paffed his childehod moii
vnquictly at home among the threateninges and terrors of his elder
brother, to which at length he^vas- compelled to geue place. When
*^ he was fled from his parentes and his natiue couhtrey , befidc that it
w.isa greuous thing to hue in banifliment, he was nothing more
kyodly or gently receiued of his vncle Laban. The it futficed not that
he had ferued feuen yeare a hard and ctuell fcruice , but that alfo he
muft be by guile dcframicd ofhis wife. For an other wiues fake he
was driucn into new feruice,where.hc was all the day fried with hcatc
of the funnc , and all the night lay waking and pained wath froft and
cold,as himfclfc complained. While he by the fpace of twentie yeares
fuflrcd fo hard a life , he was dayly vexed with ncwe iniuries of bis
^^'V' father in lawe. Neither was hequictin his owne houfe , feyng it^i^
*' uidedandinamancrfcatteredabrodewiththc hatred, bra wUng and
cnuie ofhis wiues . When he wascommaundcd to reiurne.into hi*
countrcy , he was compelled to watche an auantagc to take his lour*
ney , much like a (hamefull running away : and yet coulde he not.f<>
. efjpape the vniuft dealing ofhis father in lawe , but was faine to fufFer
,his reprochcs andrebukes in the middes ofhis iourney. Then fell he
en. J i into a much more cruell deftrcfl'e.Fqr when he came nere to his bro-
'• ther, he had fo manydcathcs before his eyes , as might be prepared
by a cruell man and a bcntencmie.So was hc.aboue meafure tormen--
ted and as it were drawen in fonder with terrible fcares^ fo long as he
looked for. his brothers comyng r-when he came ones in his fight, he
en. < ^*^'^ <lown as halfc dead at his feetc,vntil he foud him more fauorable
I. than he durfthaue hoped. 6e(ide chat, at his Hi flentrie into the laadc»
h«
God the Rcdemer* "Lib.2. 172
he loft Rachel his derclybcloued wife. Aftcrwarde he heard worde <^enj)
that the fonne which he had by her , and whome therefore he loued 35«
iabouc the rcfte, wa$ torne with wildc bcaftes : by whofe death hcwc-
great griefe he conceyucd, he himfelfe declared m this,that after long
weping he obftinately flopped vp allwayes whereby comfort might
come to him , icauing himfelfe nothing, but to eocdowne to his
fonne wayling into the graue , In the meane time howc great caufcs ^^^-ii
of griefe , way ting and werinefle were the rauiflimcnt and dcflouring
of nis daughter, and the, boldcnefle of his fonnes in rcuengingir,
which not onely made him to be abhorred in fight of all the mhabi-
tantes of that countrey , but alfo procured him mofte prefent pcrill
of vtter deftrudion ? Then followed that horrible outragious o&nfe Gen. j j
of Ruben his firft begotten fonne , which was fuch as their couMe **•
not chaunce a more grcuous . For whereas the defiling of a mans
wife is reckned among the hyeft ill fortunes: what is to be faidc
of it, when that wickcdnefle is committed byamansownelbnne?
Within a litle while after , his houfe is fpotted with an other vnna- Gen. 37
turall adultcrie : fo that Co many (hames might well brcake a hearte, * 8*
that otherwife were moft conftant and vnable to be vanquifhed with
calamities . Nere before the ende of his life , while be foug! t to pro-
uide diccour for the famine of himfelfe and other,he hasftiiken with
tidynges of a newe misfortune , vndcrfianding that an other of his
Tonnes was kept in prifon,for recouering of whome he was compel- Gcn.4«
led to leaue to the reft Bcniamin his onely dearling. Who can think-e, ^ ^
that in fuch a heape of mifcheucs he had any one moment geuen him
fafelyto take breath in? And therefore he himfelfe thebcfte wit-
nefle of himfelfe, affirmed to Pharao, that hisdiyes were fliorte and Gen. 47
cuill vpon the earth. Nowe truely he that declarcth that he hath paf- ^
fed his life by cootinuall miferies , denieth that he felt that profpe-
ritie which the Lorde had promifed him. Therefore either Jacob did
vnkindcly and vnthankefuUy weye the grace of God , or he truely
l^rofefTed that he had ben miferablc vpon the earth. If his affirma-
tion were true , then it folio weth , that he had not his hope fattened
vpon earthly thinges.
* 1 J If thefe holy fathers loked for ( as vndoubtedly they did ) a
blefTed life at the hande of God, truely they both thought and faw it
to be an other maner of blefl'cdnefTe , than the blefTcdncfTe of earthly
life. Which thingthe Apoftlc alfo doth fliewc excellently well: Abra- HeSii.
ham (faith he ) direft by faith in the lande of promife as in a ftrange ^*
lande , dwelling in tcnteswith Ifaac and Jacob parteners with him
o( the fame inhericauncc . For they loked for a citie fet vpon a good
y mj.
Gap.io, Of the knowledge of
foundatiotijthe maker and bildcr whcrof is God. All thcfc arc dead irt
faith, not reccyuing the thini^es promifed , but loking at them a farrc
of, and beleuing and confefling that they were gcftes and ttrangers
vpon the land. Whereby they declare that they fought for a countrie,
and if they had ben moued with defire of that landc from whenfc
they came, they had power to returne. But they fought tor a better,
that is the hcauenly countrie . Wherefore God is not afliamed to be
called their God , for afmuche as he hath prepared them a citle. For
they had bene duller than blockes , to followe promifes fo earneftly,
wherof there appercd no hope in earth , vnleife they had loked for
the fulBlling of them els where. But this he chiefely enforceth , and
that not without good rcafon, that they called this life a iourney fro
home,euen as Mofes reportcth.From if they were ftrangers and fore>»
nets ill the landc of Chanaan , where is the Lordcs promife whereby
5en.47"they were made heires of it ? He fheweth plaincly therefore, that the
'• Lordes promifejcocerning the poCTclTio therof, had a/urther rcfped.
Wherefore they purchaced not one foote in the lande of Chanaan^
but for hurial,wherby they teftified, that they did not hope that they
(hould receme the frure of the promife till after death. And that is thq
}en.47 caufc why lacob fo much efteemed to be buried there, that he com-r
9> aad peiled his fonne lofeph to promife it him, and to fweare to performo
L*"* jt:and why lofeph willed his bones,certaine ages after,whe they were
;.'' long before fallen into powder, to be remoued thither.
14 Fifially,it appeareth plainely,that in all the trauailes of this life
they had al way fet before them the blelTednefle of the life to come.
For to what purpofe /houldc lacob haue fo much de(ired>arid with fo
great daunger fought the preeminence of the firft begotten, which
fliould procure him nothing but banifhmcnt,and in a mancr to be caft
of from beyng his childe: but no good at alljvnleffe he had rcfped to
a hycr bleiling? And he declared, that he had this meaning by th^
>cn.4p wordes whjch he fpake among hislaft breathinges : Lorde,I wilUok©
*' for thy faluation. What faluation couldc he haue loked for,wben he
fawethat he laic ready togeuc vp the ghoft, vnleflchc had fecne in
death the beginning of a newe life? But what difpute we of thchol^
ones and children of God, wheneuenhc was not without a tafV of
fuch vnderrtanding , which otherwifc was enemie to the truthe ? Fob
fam.a J what meant Balaam when he faid : Let my foule die the death of the
"^1 righteous , and lee my laftc times be like vnto thcires ? but that he
*'" • meantc the fame thjngthat Dauid afterward e vttcred, that the death
ral.34. of tbc Saintes is precious in the (ightofthe Lorde , but the death
u of chc wicked > is very euili? If the furchcil bounde and eode \vcre
GodtheRedemcr. Lib.2 17}
mdfiftthythere could in it be noted no difference betvvcnc the righte-
ous and vnrighteousjthey difter one from the other by the dmtrfity
of the eftates,that after death fhall befall to them both.
I f We are not yet come beyonde Mofcs : Which (as thefc men
fay)had no other office,butto perfvyade the carnal people to worHijp
God by the ftutefullnefie ofthe ground & plenty of all thmges. And
yet ( vnlefle a man wjH flee the light that willingly offereth it felfe^
there is already a plaine declaration of the fpirituall couenant. But if
we come downe to the Prophetes , there with moft full brightneffc
both the life eucrlafting and the kingdome of Chrift do vttcr thcm-
felues. And firft of all Dauid,which as he was before y other in time,
fo accordinge to the order of Gods diiiribution , he {hewed the hea-
uenly miseries in (hadowes more darkeiy than the reft,yet with what
plainnelfe and certainty diredeth he all his fayings to that end? How
he ette.emed the earthly dwelling,this fcntcnce leftifieth;! am here a '^'
forencr & ftranger,as all my fathers were. Euery lining man is vanity,
euery one walkcth about as a (hadow. But now what is my exfpeda-
tion,Lord?euen to thee is my hope.Truely he that confeffing that m
the earth there is nothinge foundc or ftedfaft,kccpcth Ihll a ficdfaft-
nes of hope in God,c6(idcrcthhis felicity laicd vp in an other place.
To fuch conlideration xs he wont to call all the (aithfull, fo oft as he
rocaneth to comfort them truely . For in an other place,aftcr he had
fpoken of the (hortnelfc , and the tranfitoric and vanilhing image of
mans life,he addethrbut the mercy of the Lord is for euer vpon them
that feare him . Like wheicunto is that which is in the hundred and
fecond Pfalme. At the beginning Lord thou did ft lay the foundation pfa loi
of the carth,and the heaucns are the workes of thy handes.They (hal 17. .
pcri(h,but thou abidelithey (hall waxe oldc hke a garmenf,and thou
ihalt change them as apparell, but thou remaine the felfe fame, and
thy yeares fhall not faile:the fonnes of thy feruauntes Hiall dwell, and
thy pofterity flialbe fiabhfhed before thee.If the Godly cealTe not for
the decay of heauen & earth to be ftablillied before the Lord, it foU
Joweth, that their faluation is ioyned with the eternity of God. B«^t
that hope can not ftand at all,ynleffe it reft vpon the promife that ii
fet forth in Efay : The he3tiens(fayth the Lord) {hall vanifli away like £^
fmoke, the earth fhalbe worne out hke a garment, & the inhabitantes 6,
of it fhall pcrifti hke thofe thinges.But my faluation (halbe for euer,&
my right^oufnes {hall not faile:where cuerlaftingnes is glue to righ-
teoufnes ^ faluation , not in rcfpeft y they remamc with God^butin
fefped th^t they are felt of men.
16 Nqither may wc otbetwifc cake thqiip ihinges , that he coat"
Cap. I o. Of the knowledge of
moniy fpcakcth of the profperous fucccfle of the faithfiilI,l)Ut to ap-
ply the to the open (hewing of the heauenly glory. As thefe fayingst
P&. ^7. The Lord kepeth the foules of the righteous , he fliall dehuer them
•**• from the handof the (innerXight is anfen to the righteous , and ioy
^ to the vpright in heart. The righteoufnes of the Godly man abidetn
- ■" * for cuer:his home fhalbe exalted in glory,the defire of the finner (hal
pia.140 pcrifli. Againetbut the righteous flial cbnfcfTc vnto thy name.thc vp-
t*. right {hall dwell with thy countenance. Againe:the righteous (hall be
Pfa. ii» in eternall remembrance. Againe:Thc Lord fhall rcdecme the foules
n(^ of his feruantes. For the Lord oftentimes leaueth his fcruantes to the
^^' * luft of the wicked,not only to be vexed^but alfo to be torne in peeces
&deftroied:hefufrereththe good to lye languifKing in darkenelTe &
(ilth,while the wicked do in a manner (bine among thefiarres. And he
doth not fo chere them with y brightnes of his coutenance, that they
cnioy long cotinuing gladnes. Wherforc euen he alfo hideth not,thae
if the faithfull faflen their eyes vpon the prefcm ftate of thinges.thcy
fhalbe ftriken with a fore teptation,as though there were no fauour
or reward of innocency with God. So much doth wickednes for the
fnoft part profpcr & fiorifh , while the company of the Godly is op-
prefled with {hamc,pouerty,contempt & all kindes^of crofles. It wan-
»fa, 7 J. led but Utle(fayth hc)that my foote flipped not, & my ftcppes fell not
17* abroadcjwbile the fortune of foolcs gricueth me , and while I fee the
profpcrity of y wicked. At length after rehcarfall of it he concludeth.
I bent my thought,ifI could vnderftand thefe thinges. But it is a tor-
ment to my fpiritjtill I enter into the fan^uary of the Lord,& vnder-
ftand the laft end of them.
17 Let vs thcrfore lcame,yct by this confefHon of Dauid,that the
holy fathers vndcr the old tcflament were not ignorant,how feldom
orneuerGod doth in this worldc performe to his feruauntes thofe
things that he promifeth them,& that therefore they did lift vp their
mindes to Gods fan(Suary,wherin they had y laied vp in ftorc,which
appeareth not in v fhadow of this prcfent life. That was y laft iudge-
mcnt of God , wKich when they coulde not fee with eye», they were
content to vnderftand by faith. Trufting vpon which affiance, what-
(beuer happened in the world,yet they douted not a time would once
come,when the promifesof Godfhould be fulfilled. As thefe fayings
do witnefle, I will behold the face of God in rightcoufnefle:! will be
pr!u<» fatisficd with thy countenance. Againe.I as a greene Ohue tree in the
,0. houfe of the Lord. Againe, The righteous (hall floriHi as a Date tree,
Pfa. 51. and Hiall fpred in branches like the Ccder of Libanus,beinge planted
*l' in the houfe of y Lord, tbcyftiali florifhinthe Palaces of our God:
They
GodthcRcdemcr. Lib.2. 174
They fhatl ftill beare frute , they fhall be fat and gretne in their olde
age. When he had fayd a litlc before: How deepe arc thy thoughtes.
O Lord, while the wicked do floriflijthey bud out hke an hcrbe^ that
they may perifli for euer.Whcre is that fairc fliew and beauty of the
faithfull , but when the face of this worlde fhall be turned inward by
difclofing of the kingdom of God ? When tiiey turned their eyes to
that eternity , they defpifed the hardnefle enduring but a momcrtt of
prefcnt miferies , & boldly burftfoorth into thefe words:Thoufhalt pfa, jj^
not fuffer for euer the righteous to die , but thou Ihalt throw downc »}»
the wicked headlong into y pit ofdeftrudion.Whcrc as in this world
the pitof ctemali deftrudion that may fwallow vp tlie wicked? Amog
whofe fchciriesjthis is alio reckened in an other place,that they clofe
vp the end of their life in a momet, without long languifhing. Wiiere j^j,^ ^^
is that fo great ftedfaftneiTe of the holy ones, whom Dauid himfelfe 1 1,
cch where complaineth,not only to be fhakcn with trouble, but alfo
to be opprcfl'ed,and vtterly broken in peeces rForfoothjhc did fet be-
fore his cycs,not what the altering courfe of the world bearethjwhich
is vnftable & more vnftcdfaft than the ebbinge and flowing of tides,
but what the Lord will do, when he fhall one day fitte for the eternall
fettling of heaucn and earth. As in an other place he excellently wei
dcfcribeth it:Thc foolifh do ftay vpon their welthines, 8c are proud c ^ ^**
becaufe of their great riches. And yet no ma,though he florifh in ne- ' *
ucr fo great dignity,can redeeme his brother from dearh,no man can
pay to God the price of hirranfome, but whereas they fee that both
the wife do die , and that the wicked alfo and foolcs do perifh & Icauc
their riches to ftrangers , yet ihcy thinkc that their houfes fhall abide
for eucr , and their dwellings to the ende of agcs,and they aduaunce
theirnames vpon the earth , but man ihall not continue in honor :hc
fhalbe like to the beaftes that die . This imagination of theirs is ex-
tremeft folly, which yet thcicpoftcrity do greedily foUow.They fhall
be placed like a flocke in Hell , and death fHall hauc rule oucr them.
When the light arifeth, the vpright (hall haue dominion ouer them,
the beauty of them fhall pcrifn,Hell is their dwelling houfc.Firft this
laughinge to fcornc of the fooUHi , for that they reft on the flipperjr
and rolling good things of the worlde, doth fhew that the wife muft
fceke a farre other felicity. But there he more euidcntly difdofcth the
niiftery of the rcfurreAion,wherc after the deftrudion & extinguifh-
mcnt of ihem,he ercdlcth the kingdom of the Godly.For what rifing
of lighr(I pray you) ihal we call that^but the rcueehng of the new life
which followcth the end of this prcfent life.
. iB From ehenle did ipring vp that confideration^which (he faith-
Cap.io. Of the knowledge of
foil oftentimes vfed for a comfort of their milerics and remedy of
PC)0.6 patience:It is but a moment in the Lordcs diipleafure, and life in his
mercy. How did they determine affli^ions to end in a moment, chac
were in affinftion in a manner their life long? where did they cfpie Co
long an enduring of Gods kindencffe, whereof they fcarfcly felt any
^ litle taft ? If they had (licked faft vpon the earth , they coulde haue
founde no fuch thing,but becaufe they looked vpon heaucn,they ac-
knowledged that it is but a moment of time , while the Lordcxcrcifc
his holy ones by the crolTcbut that his roerciesjwherin they are ga-
thered-together,do iaft the worldcs age. Againe,they did fbrefcc the
etcrnall and neuer endingc deftrudion of the vngodly, which were as
Pro,io. in a dreame happy for one day. Whereupon came thefe fayingsrThe
7. remembrance of the righteous (hall be in bleflirtgc , but the name of
Tfa.ioo the wicked (hall tot. Precious is the death of the Saintes in the (ighc
*^. & of the Lord,bu( the death of the wicked,moIt euill. Againe in Samu-
i^Stnut '^* ^^* Lorde (hall keepe the fcete of the holy,and the wicked (hall
^ be put to (ilcnce in datkcnefTe.Which do declare that they wcl knew,
that howfocucr the holy were diucifly caried abouc>yet their iaft end
is life and faluation ; and that the profperity ofthe wicked is a plea-
faunt way , whereby they by litle and litle Aide forward into the gulfe
of death. Therefore they called the death of fuch, the deftruftion of
Eze.28. ^^^ vncircumcifed , as of them from whom the hope ofthe refurrc*
10. & n dion was cut away. Wherefore Dauid could not deuifea more gree*
pfa. 65, uous curfc than this : Let them be blotted out ofthe booke of lifc,8c
• • not be written with the righteous.
19 But aboue all other, notable is that faying of lob : Ilcnow that
my redemer liueth,Sc in the Iaft day I dial rife againe out ofthe earth,
and in my Hefli I (hall fee God my fauiour : This hope is layed vp ia
my bofome. Some that haue a minde to make a (hew of their fharpe
wit , do cauill that this is not to be vnderftanded of the Iaft refurrc*
, dion^but ofthe firft day that lob looked to haue God more gentle to
^g ' him , which although wc graunt them in parte , yet (hall we enforce
them to confcfTe whether they will or no, that lob coulde not haue
come to that largenes of hope, if he bad refted his thought vpon die
earth. Therefore we mutt needes confeflfe , that he lifted vp his eyes
to the immortality to come, which faw, that his redeemer would be
{>refent with him euen lying in his graue.For to them that thinkc on-
y of this prefcnt life,death is their vttermoft defperation:which very
lob. ij. death could not cut of lobs hope.Yea though he kill mc(faid he)ne-
■S« ucrthclcfle I will ftill hope in him. And let no triflcr here carpe againft
mc and fj^y, %hi% theft were the fayingcs but ofafcw, whereby is not
God the Rcdemer. Lib.^. • 175
proucd that fuch dodrinc was among the Icwcs. For I will byandby
anfwcrc him , that thcfe few did not in thefc fayingcs vttcr any fccrct
wifcdom, whercunto only cercainc excellent wittcs were fcucrally &
priuarely lufiered to attaine,bur that as they were by the holy Ghoft
appointed teachers of the people/o they openly publifhed thofe mi*
ft?rie$ of God that were to be vniuerfally learned , and ought to be
the principles of the common religion among the people. Therforc
whc we heare the publike oracles of the holy Ghoft,wherin he fpakc
of the fpiriiuall life fo clearly and plainly in the Church of the lewes,
it were a point of vntolcrable ftubbornneffe to fend them away onely
CO the fiefhly couenant , wherein is mention made of nothinge , but
earth and earthly wealthineffe.
10 If I come downc to the later Prophetcs j there we may freely
walkc as in our owne fielde . For if it were not hard for vs to get the
Vpper hande in Dauid, lob, and Samuel, here it {hall be much more
caHe.For God kept this diftribution and order in difpofing the coue*
uant of his mercy , that how much the nearer it drew on in proceife
of time to y ful performance thereof, with fo much greater encreafc-
mentes of reuelation he did day by day more brightly {hew it.Ther*
fore at the beginninge when the fii{l promife of faluation was made
vnto Adam, there gli{lercd out but as it were fmale fparkles of it. Af-
ter , hauinge more added vnto it , a greater largetiefTe of light began
to be pot forth : which from thenfe forth brake out more and more,
and difplaied her brightneffe farther abroade , till at length all the
doudes were driuen away , and Chrift the fonne of rightcoufoelTe
fully lightned the whole world. We needc not therefore to feare that
wc faile of teOimonics of the Prophctes , if we fceke them to proue
our caufe , but becaufe 1 fee that there will arife a huge deale of mat-
rer , whereupon 1 {houlde be conftrained of necclTity to tary longer
then the proportion of my purpofe may beare,for it woulde fo grow
to a worke of a great volume , and alfo becaufe I haue already , bf
thofe thinges that I hauefayd before , made plainethe way , cucn
for a reader of meane capacity , fo as he may go forward without flu-
bhnge : therefore I will at this prcfent ab{laine from longetediouf^
neffe : which to do is no IciTe necelfary : but giuinge the readers war-
ning before hande , that they remember to ope their owne way with
that key that we haue firlt giuen them m their hande . That is , tha?
fo oft as the Propheces fpeake of the blcfrcdncffe of the faithful peo-
ple, whereof fcarfcly the leaU itf ppes arc feene in this prefent life,
they may reforte to this diftindicm : that the Prophctes , the better
to exprcHi: the goodncde of Godidid as in a fhadow exf rclFc tc totEh«
Cap.io. Ofthc knowledge of
people by tcmporallbenefitcs, asby ccrtainc rough drawinge of the
portraiture tberof:but that the perfed »magc,that they hauc painted
therof, was fuch as might rauifh mens mindcs out ofthc eartl>5& out
ofthc elements of this worlde , and of the age that Ihall perifh , and
of neccffity raife it vp to the colidcring ofthc fehciiy ofshc life chat
is to come and fpiritoall. : l _ >
1 1 We will be content with one example . When the I/raelitcs
being caricd away to Babylon, faw their fcattering abroade to be hke
vnto death , they coulde hardly be remoued from this opinion that
I*e.j7, ihey thought that all was butfables that Ezechiel propheeiedof
4» their reftitution : becaufe they reckened it eucn all one as if he had
told them that rotten carcafes (houlde be reftored againe to hfe.Thtt
Lord to (hevvjthat eucn that fame difficulty could not itop him front
bringinge hisbcnefitetoeffed, fiiewedto the Prophet m a vifion a
ficlde full of drie bones , to the which in a moment with the oncl/
power of his word he reftored bi'eath and huehnefle. The vifion in
dcde ferued to correct the incredulity at that preftnt time: bu: m the
mcanc feafon he did put the levies in mmdc how farrc the power of
the Lord extended beyond the accomptofthe people, wbichfocafi*
ly quickened with his only becke,bones already rotten and fcattcrcd
abroadc.-wherfore you (hal copare that with an other faying of Efaie,
%Ca.i6, T^c <^cad fliail rife, my carcafe, they fhallrife againe. Awake ye and
j^, rcioyfe that dwell in the duft, becaufe the deawof the greene fieldc
is thy deaw,& thou (halt pluckc downe the lande ofthc Giantes into
ruinc.Go my peopJcenrer into thy tentes:fhuc thy dorcs vpon thee:
hide thee a httle while, till my difplcafurc paffe ouer. For behold,thc
Lordfhallgo out of his place,to vifite the iniquity ofthc dweller vpo
the earth againft him,and the earth Hiall ilicwe forth her bloodc,and
(hall no longer hide her flaine^
zz Albeit a man fhould dofondly,that woirfdgoabout to dtawc
all to fuch a rule.For there be fomc places that without'any couering
dofhew the immortahty tocome,thatis prepared for the faithful! ia
the kingdome of God , of which forte we haue recited fome,and of
like forte are the moft part ofthc reft, fpecially thefe two,, the one in
£fa 66, Efay. As a new heauen,& a new earth which 1 make to ftandc before
**• me, fo fhall your feede ftande, and there fhalbe monedi of moneth»
and Sabbat of Sabbat : allflefhfhall come to worfhippc before mf
face,faith the Lord- And they (hall go out and fee the deade carcafes
of the men that haue offervded againft me,that their worme fhall not
Da.ia.r die,and their fier fhall nor be vjJcnched.Thc other of Daniel. In that
iiflQC iliall rife vp Michael the great prince,thac ftadcth for the f(>nncs
of
GodthcRcdemcr. Lib. 2. ij6
of his pcopIe,and there (hall come a time of diitrefle, fuch as was not
(ince nations firft began to be , and then (hall all thy people be faued
that (hall be founde wry tten in thy booke. And of thofe that flepe in
the duft of the earthjthere fhall awake feme to cternall hfe,and lome
to cuerlafting fliame.
23 Now as for prouing y other two pointes that the fathers had
Chrift for pledge of their coucnant , and that they repofcd in him all
their affiance of bleffingji will not trauaile therein at allabecaufc they
haue both Icflc controucrfie & more plainneflc.Lct v$ therfore bold-
ly dctermincthisjwhich by no engines of the deuil may be remoued,
that the olde Teftament or couenant which the Lord made with his
people Ifrael, was not limited within the compalTe of earthly things.
Due alfo contcined the promife of the fpirituall and eternalllife : the
cxpedation wherof muft nedes haue binimprinted in all their mindes
that cruc-ly confented to the couenant . But let vs put farre away this
mad and pernicious opinion^that either God did fet forth in his pro*
mife to the lewes nothing elfe,or that the lewcs fought nothing elfe
but filling of their belly,delites of the flelh,florifhing wealchjOUtward
powcr/rutefullnefTe of children,and whatfoeuer a naturall man cftc-
mcth.For at this day Chrift promifeih no other kingdom of heauen
to his,but where they fhall reft with Abraham,Ifaac,and lacob. And Matt.f.
Peter affirmed, that the lewcs of his time were hcires of the grace of ' »•
the Gofpcljfor that they were the children of the Prophets,comprc- ^ ^^
hended in the couenant , which the Lord had in the olde time made ^
with his people . And , that the fame fhoulde not be witnefTed with
wordcs only,the Lord ajfo approued it by dccde.For in the very mo- Mat.x7.
mcnt that he rofe againe,he vouchfaued to haue many of y holy men S»»
to rife againe in company with him, & made them to be leene in the
City : fo giuing arj afltircd tokeB,that whatfoeuer he did and fuffcred
for y purchafing of cternall faluation,periaincth no leflfe to the faith-
full of the old teftametjthan vnto vs.For as Peter teftifieth.they were . «
ialfo endued with y fame fpirit of faith, whcrby we are regenerate in- g. *
to life. Now, when we heare that the fame fpirit which is in v$ a ccr-
taine fparcle of immortality, whcrupon it is alfb in an other place cal-
led the carneft of our inhcritance,<fid like wife dwell in the, how dare
we take from the y inheritance of life? Wherby it is fo much y more
maruell, that in the olde time the Sadduces fell to fuch grofTencfTe of
errourjthat they denied both the refurre^on & alfo the fubftancc of
foulesjboth which pointes they faw fealed with fo clearc teftimonies
of Scripture. And nolefTc to be marucled at,eiien at this day, were the
folly of all that nation in looking for the earthly kingdom of Clirift,
kU.H
Cap.ii. Ofthe knowledge of
if the Scriptures had not long before declared, that they (hould hatfe
that punifhmenc for refufinge the Golpell. For fb it behoued, by the
lutt ludgement of God,fo ftrike thofe mindes with bhndencs,which
in refufing the hght of heaucn being offered them, did wilfully bring
themieiues into darkeneire.Therfore they read and contmoaUy turne
a.Cor.3 ouer Mofes , but they are ftopped with a veile fet betwene them and
*^ him, that they can not fee the light that {hineih in hi$ countenance.
And fo rhal itremaine couercd & hidden fiom thcm.tillhc be turned
to Chrift, from v/j^.om now they trauailc to Jeade & drawc him away
fo much as in them lieth.
The xi. Chapter.
of the difference ofthe eme T e figment fromthe tther*
WHat then ? wilt thou fay : (hall there be no difference left
betwene the olde Teftament and the New? and to what
purpofe lerue all thofe places of Scripture , where they
arc compared one againft the other^as things moft con*
trary?I do willingly ailowc thofe differences that arcrehearfcd in the
Scripture .' but fo that they nothinge hinder the yniiy already ftabli-
(hed , as it fhalbe plaine to fee when we fhall haoe entreated of them
in order. Thofe differences arc ( as farrcas euerl could marke or can
remember ) chicfely foure in nurnber, to the which if you lift ro ad-
ioyne the y I am not againft it . I fay and truft to proue that they ar«
all fuch as rather belonge to the manner of miniitration , than to the
fubflance of them. And by this meane they fhall nothing hinder, but
that the promifes of both the old and new teftament may remaync aH
one and all one foundation ofthe fame promjfcs,Chrift.Now the ikft
difference is,tbat although^euen, in the old time alfo,the Lordes will
was to dired the mindes of his people, and to haue them raifed vp ta
the heauenly inheritance : yet , that they might be the better nouri-
fhed in hope thereof, he gaue it to be feene or rather to be taflcd of,
vndcr earthly benefites ? But now hauing reueled the grace ofthe hfc
to come , by the Gofpell , he more clearly and plainely diredcth our
mindes the f^reight way to the meditation thereof,leauing the inferi-
our maner of exercifing which he vfed with the Ifraclite^.Thcy that
marke not this purpofe of God , do not thinkc that the olde people
climbed any hier than to y good things promifed to y body.They (o
often heare the landc of Chanaan named , as the excelletK , or rathec
only reward for the kepcrs of Gods law.They heare that God threat*
Qcth nothing more feuerely co the craofgrcfTors ofthe famciaw,thaa
that
GodthcRcdemcr. Lib.2. 177
tliat they flialbe driucn out of the poflcffion of the fame Iand,& fcat-
tcred abroadc into ftrangc regions. They fee that in a manner to this
cfFed come all the blcflines & curfes that are pronounced by Mofes.
Hereby they do vndoutedly determine , that the lewes not for their
ownc fakcsjbut for othersjwere fcucred fro other nations :that is.that
ihc Church of Chrift might haue an imagejin whofe outward forme
fhe might fee examples of fpiruuall things. But fith the Scripture doth
ibmctimes ftievv, that God himfdfe dircdcd all the earthly bencfires
that he did for them to this end, that fo he might leadc them by the
hand to the hopcofhcauely benefites.lt was too much vnskiKulnes,
I will not fay block ifhneflcjnot to confidcr this order of difpofition.
Theiflueor point of our controuerfie with this forte ofmcn is this,
that they teach that the pofTeflio of the land of Chanaan was to the
Ifraehtes their chiefe and laft blefltdncs, & that to vs after the reue-
ling of Chriftjit doth but figuratiuely fignifie y heaucnly inheritance.
On the other (idc we affirme , that they did m the earthly poflcflion
which they enioyed, as in a lookinge glalfc behold the inheritance io
come,which they bcleued to be prepared for them in hcaucn.
% That {hall better appeare by the fimilitude that Paul vftd to the
Galatians.He compareth the nation of the lewcs to an hcirc,within Gal.^.i
age, which beinge not yet able to to gouernehimfelfe, followeth the
guiding of the tutor or fchoolemaifter, to whofe cuftody he is com-
mitted. And whereas he appheth that fimilitude to the ceremonies,
thatnothingchindereth but that it may alfo very fitly ferue to this
purpofc.The fame inheritance was appointed for them,that was ap-
pointed for vs;but fuch as yet for want of age, they were not of capa-
city to enter vpon and vfe . The fame Church was among them, but
whereof the age was yet but childifh. Therefore the Lord kept them
vnder this fchooling,that he gaue them not the fpirituail promifcs fo
naked and openly ,but as it were fliadowed \^ earthly promifes.Ther-
fore,where he called Abraham , lfaac,and lacobjand their pofterity
vnto hope of immortality,he promifcd them the land of Chanaan to
be their inheritance .not to determine their hopes vpon it,but that in
beholding of it, they (houlde exercife and confirme themfelues in the
hope of that true inheritance that did not yet appeare. And that they
might not be deceiucd,there was giucn them a hicr promifc to tettify,
that thatlandc was not the hieft benefice of God . So Abraham was
not fuffred to he flouthfull in the promife receiued of the lande , init
his minde was with a greater prcmifc raifed vp vnto the Lord.For A-
braham heard this fayd rnto him : I am thy protedorj& thy reward Ge.ij.i
exceeding great. Here wc fee, that Abraham hath the endc of his rc-
Z
Cap.i !• Of the knowledge of
ward fee forth in the Lord,tliac he fhould not accompt vpon a tranfT-*
toiy and flippery reward in the elementes of this worlde , but rathcc
ihinkc It to be luch as can not wither away. Afterward headioynetb
the promife o f the land to no other intent,but that it fhould be a tOt
ken of the good will of God, & a figure ofthehcauely inheritance.-
And that the holy men had this mcaning,iheir owne fayingcs do de-
Pfal.73. clare.So D.iuid rifeth vpward from temporall bleffings, to that fame
a<5- & higheft & laft blefTmgjMy heart (faith he)& my flelli faint for defire
Pfal.i 6. of thee. God is my portion for euer. Againc,The Lord is y part of my
5. iriherirance, and of my cup:thou art he that faueft mme heritage for
pra.142 me. Againe. Ihauecriedvnto rhee, O Lordcj I haue faydjThou art
^' my hopc,my portion in the land of the liuing.Truely they that dare
fo fpeal<c,do v/ichout dout profeife that with their hope they chmbc
aboue the world,and all the good thinges here prefcnt.But the Pro-
phetes do oft dcfcribe this blsffcrdncin- of y v;orld to f ome, vndcr the
figure that they had receiued of the Lord. And fo arc thefe fayings to
lob. 18. be vnderftanded.Thaty Godly Ihal poflefTethe iande by inhcritace,
17. and the wicked ihalbe dellroied out ofir.That Hierufale fhal abound
with all kinde of richcfle,and Sion ouerflow with plenty of all things.
All which we fee, can not properly be fpoke of the land of our way-»
Pfa.i J 3 faringcjor the earthly Icruialem, but of the true contry of the f aith-
3* full, and that hcaucnly ciiie>wherein the Lord hath comaunded blef-
lingand life for euer.
^ This is the reafon why it is read that the holy me in time of the
oldeteftamentjdid efteme the mortal life & the blelfings therofmorc
than is now meete to do. For although they knew vvel y they flioulde
not reft in it,as in the end of their race,yet whe they called to mind,
what markes of his grace y lord had pointed therin,to exercifc them
according to y finall rate of their tcndernes,they felt a greater fweet-
nesofitjthan if they had confidered it by itfelfe,Buras the Lorde in
tcftifying his good will toward the faithtull, by prefcnt good things,
did as in {hadowc cxprefTe the fpirituall felicity , by fuch figures and
{i^nes: fo on the other fide he did in corporall paines fhew examples
of his judgement againft the reprobate. Therfore,as the bcncfites of
God were to be feene in earthly things.fo were alfo his puniflimcnts.
While the vnskilfull do not weye this comparifon or agreement5as I
may call it bctwenc the punifhmentes and the rewardcs,they maruell
at fo much alteration in God^that in olde time was fo fodamly ready
to take vengeace on euery offence of man with iterne & horrible pu-
ninimentes,& now as if he had layed away the afFcdion of his old an*
gnnes>hc puniHieth both much more gentlie & fcldomer>y ea and for
the
GodtheRedemer. 'Lib.2. , ^ . 178
tKc (atne caufe they do almoft imagine feuerall gods of y old & new
£cftament:which the Manichees did in dede. But we llial eafily be dc-
liuercd from fuch dout€$,if we lay -our mindes to confidcr this order-
ly difpofiiion of God that I haucfpoken of, whofe will was for the
tim? to figniiie & let forth in figure both the grace of the cternali fe-
licity to comcjby temporall benefitcs,and the greuoufnes of the fpi-
rituall death,by corporall paincs.Whereby he deiiucred his Teftamet
to the IfraeiitcSjas yet after a certaine mancr folded vp.
4 An other difference of the olde and newe Teftamcnt is fayd to
be in the figurcs:for that the olde teftament did (hew oncly an image
in abfence of the trueth, and a fhadow in ftecde of the body. But the
new teftamcnt giueth the trueth prefcntjand the founde body it felfe.
And this difference is mentioned commonly wherefoeucr tlic newe
teftament is in comparifon fet againft the olde : but it is more largely
entreated of in the cpiftle to the Hebrues than any where elfe.Therc
the Apoftlcdifputeth againft thcm,which thought that the obferua-
tion of Mofes law might not be taken away , but that they mould al-
Co draw with them the ruine of all religion . To confute this errour,
he vfcth that which had bin forefpoken by the Prophete concerning
the priefthoodeof Chrift. For whereas there is giuenhim aneternall pC3.ioq
priefthoode,itis certaine,that that priefthoode is taken away,wherin lo.
new fucccHburs were daily put in,onc after an other. But he proueth
that the inftitution of this new priefthoode is to be preferredjbecaufe
it is ftabiifhcd with an oth. He after addeth further, that in the fame
change of the priefthoode , is alfo contained the change of the Te- „ .
ftament. And that it was ncceffary fo to bc,he proueth by this reafon: , ^^g^ J'
for that the weakeneffe of the law was fuch that it coulde heipe no- & p. 9,
thing, to perfcdion. Then he procecdeth in declaring what was that & lo. i.
\veakenes,eucn this, that it had certaine outward righteoufnes of the
fleftijwhich could not make the obferuers of them pcrfedjaccording
to confcience.'that by facrifices of beaftes,it could neither wipe away
finnes.nor purchafc true hoJines. He concludeth therforc that there
was in it a fhadow of good thinges to come, but not the liuely image
of the thinges themfelues ; & that therfore it had no other office,buc
to be as an introdu^ion into a better hope , which is dchuered in
the Gofpcll. Here is to be (ecne , in what point the couenant of the
law is compared with the couenant of the Gofpelhand the miniftery
of Chrift with the miniftery ofMofes.For if the comparifon concer-
ned the fubftance of the promifes , then were there great difference
bctwcene the two tcftamentes : butfith the point of our cafe lea-,
(ieth vs an other way , we muft tende to this ende , to finde out; the
Z ij.
Cap. II. . Oftheknowledgcof
trueth.Let vs then fet forth here the couenant which he hath Habli*
fhed to be ciernall,an<ineucr to perifh.The accomphrtimcnt thcrof,
wherby it attaineth to be ftablirhed & continuing in force , is Chnft*
While fuch eftablifhment was in expcdation,the Lord did by Mofe$
apoint ceremonieSjto be as it were folemne figne« of the confirma-
tion.Now this came there in queftion, whether the ceremonies that
were ordained in y law ought to giue place to Chrift or no. Although
thefc ceremonies were in dcde only accidcnts,or verily additions and
things adioyned,or(as the people call them)accefrary thinges to the
couenant , yet bccaufe they were inftrumcntes or meancs of the ad*
minsftration theroF, they bearc the name of the couenant it felfe , a»
the like is wont to be attributed to ot-her Sacramentes. Therefore ill
fumme,the olde Tcftament is in this place called the folemne forme
of confirming the coucnant,containcd in Ceremonies and SacnficcSi
The Apoftie fayth , that becaufe in it is nothinge perfe<^, vnlefle we
paffe furtjicr, therefore it bchoued that they fhould be difconrinued
and abrogate,that place might bcgiuen to Chrift the aflurer and me-
diatour of a better teftament,by whom eternall fandification is oncfc
purchaced to the cled.and the tranfgrefTions blotted out that remai-
ned vnder the law.Or,if you like it bettcr,thus ; That the olde tefta-t
ment of the Lord was that , which was dcUuered , wrapped vp m thd
ihadowifh and efFcduall obferuation of ceremonies : and that there-
fore it was but for a timcibecaufe it did but(3S it were)hang in fufpefc
vntill it might flay vpon a more ftedfaft and fubftaniiall confirmatfo:
and that then onely it was made newe ahd eternall , after that it was
confecrate and ftabhfhed by the blood of Chrift. Whereupon Chrift
calleth the cup that he gaue at his fuppcr to his Difciples , The cup
of the new tcftament in his blood:to fignifie,that then the tcftamcnc
of God attaineth his tructh: by which it becommcih new & eternal,
when it is fealed with his blood.
5: Hereby appeareth in what fenfe the Apoftie fayd : that in the
fchoohnge of the law, the lewes were brought vnto Chrift, before
that he was ftiewcd in the flefli. And he confefl"cth,that they were the
children and heires of God,butyct fuch,as for their yong age were to
be kept vndcr the cuftody of a fchoolemaifter . For it behoued, that
ere the fonne of rij^hteoufnefle was yet rifcn, their ftiould neither be
fo great brighrncfle of reuelation , nor fo great deepe fight of vnder-
ftandinge. Therefore God fo gaue them inmeafurcthehghtofhis
wordjthat they faw it as yet farre of and darkely .Therefore Paulc ex-'
prciTeth this fclendernefle of vnderftandinge by the tearme of yong
age, which the Lordes will was to haue to be eJiercifed with the ele>
mcntc$
God the Redemer. Lib.2. 17^
in^ntcs of this world & with outward obferuations,as rules of inftru-
^lon for children vntill ChrrO fhould fliine abroad , by whom it be-
houed that the knowledge of the faithful! people fliould grow to full
age.This diftmdion Chiift himfelfe meant of,when he faid.that the ^^t-".
law and the Prophetes were vniiU Iohn,and that from thcnfefoorth *^*
the kingdom of God is preached. What did the law & the Prophetes
open to men of their time?euen this,they gauc a taft of that wifdom
which in time to come ihould be plainly difclofedrand they fhewed it
i>cforc as it were twinclingly Hiining a far of.But whe it came to palTc
y Chnlt might be pointed to with the finger,thc was the kingdom of
God fetope For inhimarelaiedabroade thetreafurcsof all yvifdora
and vnderftandingjwhereby wc attainejCiien in a manncr,into the fc- Col. i.j
i;»ct.cloreis of hcauen.
- 6 And it makeih not againft vs, that there can (carfely any one be
found in the Chriftian Church,that in excellency of faith may be co-
pared with Abraham.or that the Prophetes excelled in fuch force of
IpiritCjthat cuen at this day they lighten the whole world withall.Fcr
our queftion is not here, what grace the Lord hath bellowed vpon a
fewe , but what ordinarie difpofition he vfed in teaching his people:
fuch as is declared in the Prophetes themfelucs » which were endued
with peculiar knowledge aboue the reft. For euen their preachingc is
jdarke and endofed in figures, as of thinge«:a ferre of Moreoucr how
maracllous knowledge focuer appeared in them abouc other,yet for*
afmuch as they were driuen of neceflity to fubmii them to the com-
nron childifh inftrudlioof the pcople^thcy ihemrducs alfo were reck-
ncd in the number of children . Finally , there neuer chaunt;cd any
fuch cleare fight to any at that time , but that it did in fome parte
fauour of the daikcncfle of the time. Whereupon Chrift fayd, Many \fat.i 5.
Jkings and Prophetes haue defired to fee the thingcs that ye fee , and i7.
haue not feene thcrarand to heare the things that yc heare,and haue Loc.io,
not heard them.Therefore bUfled arc your eyeSjbccaufe they fee,& *^*
your eares bccaufc they heare.And truely it was meetc that the pre-
fence of Chrift ftiould haue this excellency of prerogatiue,that from
it ftiould arifc the cleare rcucahng of the heauenly mifteries. And for
this puipofe alfomaketh that, which euc we now allcaged out of the
firft epiftle of Peteruhatit was opened to them,that their trauaile was i.Pet.i.
profitable,principally for our age. 12.
7 Now I come to the third difference , which is taken out of Te- ler. ji,
remicjwhofe wordes are thcfe.Behold the daycs ftiall comc,fayrh the ju
Lord,and I will make a new coucnant with the houfe of Ifraell,& the
hpufe of luda^noc according to the coucnant that I made with your
Z iij.
Cap.ii. ' Ofthe knowledge of
-FatherSjin the day when I cooke them by the hande,to leadc the out
of the landc of ^itgyptjthc couenant that they made voidc although
I ruled ouer them, But this (hal be the coUenant that I will make with
the houfe of Ifraell . I will put my la we in their bowelles , and I will
wryte it in their hearte$,and I will be mercifuUto their iniquity. And
no man lliall teach his neighbour, and no man his brother. For they
■ih'dW all know me,from the leaft vnio the moft. Of which wordes the
Apoftlc tooke occafion to make this comparifon betwene the law &
i.Cor»i the Gofpelljthat he called the law a literall,and the Gofpcll a fpiritu-
*• all dodrine;the law,he faid^was fafhioned out in Tables of ftone, the
Gofpell written in heartes : that the law was the preaching of death,
the Gofpell the preaching of liferthc law the preaching of damnatio,
the Gofpell the preachinge of righteoufnefle ; that the lawe is made
voide,that the Gofpell abideth. Sith the Apoftles purpofe was but
to declare the meaningc of the Prophet , it (hall be fufficicnt that wc
weye the wordes of one of the,ta atbine the meaning of them both.
Albeit,there is fomc vnlikenes betwene them. For the Apoftlc fpca-
keth more odioufly of the law than the Prophet doth: and that not in
fimplc refpeft of the bw , bat becaufc there were certaine naughty
men , hauing a wrong zcale to the law, which did with pcruerfe louc
of the ceremonieSjobfcurc the brightneffc of the Gofpfell He difpu-
teth of the nature of the law , accordinge to their errour and foolifli
'aftcdion. Therefore it {hall be good to note that peculiarly in Paul.
But both of ihem,becaufe they do by cdmpirifon fct the olde and the
new tcftamentjthe one againlt the other: do confider nothing in the
lawjbut that which properly belongeth vnto it. As for example. Thfc
law doth commonly in euery place containe pron'.ifes of mercy, but
becaufe they are borowedfrom elfcwhere, therefore they arc not
reckened as part of the kw, whe the mere nature of the law is fpoken
of. The oncly thing they afcribe vntoit,to commaundc thingcs that
are right,and to forbid wicked doingsrto promife reward to the follo-
wers of righteoufnefle, and to threaten punilhmentto the tranfgref^
fours : but in the meanc time neither to change nor amende the ptr-
uerfenes of heart,that is naturally in all men.
8 Now let vs expounde the Apoftles comparifonjOne peccc after
an other.The old teftament is literal,becaufe it was publifhed without
the cffe<ftuall workinge of the fpinte:The new is fpirituall, which the
Lord hath fpiritually grauen in the heartes of men. Thcrfore the fc-
cond diucrfity is as it were a declaration ofthefirft.The old is deadly,
becaufe it can do nothinge but wrappe all mankinde within the curfe.
The new is the inftrumcnt of life^bccaufe ic dcliucrcih from curfe, &
rcftorcth
GodtheRedemer. Lib.2. i8o
rcftorcth into fauour with God.The olde is the minirtery of damna-
•iionjbecaufeit condemneth all Adams children of vnrighteoufncile.
'The new is the miniftery of righreoufnefle , becaufe it rcuealcth the
mercy of God,by which we are made righteous. The lai^ diueriity is
to be referred to the ceremonies. Becaufe the old telbnient had an i-
mage of thingcs abf.ntj it bt houed tiiat it fliould in.time decay & va-
nifli aw;>y.but the GofpcU , becaufe it giueth the true body m deedc,
;.keepcth ftiil a Hrine & perpctunll iledfaltnes.lcrcnue in deede calleth
'cuen the mon.il lawes, a vvenkc and fraile coucnant:but that is for an
other rcafon, becaule by the fodaine falling away of the vnthankefull
people, it was byandby broken, but forafmUch as fuch breakinge of it
was the fault of the people,it can not properly be layd vpon the tcfta*
ment . But the ceremonies , forafmuch as by their ownfe vvcakeiielfc
were diflblued by the c5ming of Chrift,had the caufe of thtir weake-
nefie.within themfelues.Now, that difference of the letter and fpinte
is not fo to be takcjas though the Lord had giuen his lawes to the le-
-wes without any friite at ali,hauing none of the conuertcd vnto him:
But it IS fpokcn by way of comparifon , to aduaunce the aboundance
of grace , wherewith the fame lawmaker as it were putting on a new
perlbhagCjdid honorably fct forth the preaching of the Gofpell. For
if we recken vp the multitude of thcfe whom the Lord out of all pco-
iples hath by the preaching of the Gofpel regenerate with his fpirite,
nnd gathered into the communion of his Church , we lliall fay, that
there were very fcwc^ or in a manner none in t'ne olde time in Ifrael!,
.that with affedion ofniinde and entirely from their heart embraced
the couenant of the Lord.who yet were very many, if they be recke-
ned in their owne number without comparifon.
9 Out of the third diffciecc rifeth y fourth.For the Scripture cal-
leth the eld tcftamcntjthe teftametofbondagejfor that it ingendreth
feare in mens mindes:but the new tefiament,the tcftament of liberty,
becaufe it raifcth them vp to confidence & aflurednes. So faith Paule Ro.S.k
in the eight to the Romaines.Ye haue not receiued the fpirit of bon-
dage againe to feare,but y fpirit of adoption,by which we eric Abba,
/ather.Hereunto fcructh that in the epiftle to the Hebrues , that the ^^^
faithfuU are not now come to the bodily mount, and to kindled fire, jg^ '
& whirlewindcdarkenes and tempeft,whecc nothing can be heard or
fecfie but that ftrikethmens mindes withtcrrour, infomuchthac
Mofes himfelfe quaked for feare , when the terrible voice founded,
which they all befought, that they might not heare :But that we arc
come to the Mount Sion, and the Citicof thcliuinge God, the
heauenly Hierufalem. But that which Paulc ihortcly touchcth in the
Z iiij.
21
Cap.ii. Ofthc knowledge of
fentece that wc baue alleaged out of the cpilHe to the Romaines, he
fettctii out more largely m the Epiftle to the Galatians, when he ma-
keth an allegory of y two fonnes of Abraham,after this manner,that
Gah.4. Agar the bondwoman is a figure of the mount Sinai>whcre the peo-
ple of ifrae I recciued the law : Sara the frcewoman is a figure of the
hcaucnly Hierufalemj from whenfe pioceedeth the Gofpell. That, as
the Cecdt of Agar is borne bonde, which may neuer come to y mhe-
ritance,and the fcede of Sara is borne free, to whom the inheritance
is due: fo by the law we are made fubied to bondagc,by the Gofpell
only we are regenerate into freedom . Butthefummecommetn to
this eftedjthat the old teftameni did ftricke into confciences fearc &
tremblingc : but by the benehte ofthc new tcfiamcnt it commeth to
paire,that they are made ioy full, The olde did hold confciences bound
vnto the yoke of bondagc,by the liberality of the new they are dif-
char^ed of bondage,and brought into freedom. But if out ofthc peo-
ple oflfracl they obied againft vs the holy £athers5who fith it is eui-
dentjthat they were endued with the fame fpirit that we are, it foUo-
wcth that ihcy were alfo partakers both of the felfe fame freedom &
ioy:We anfwcrejthat neither of both came of the law. But that when
they felt iherafelues by the law to be both opprcfTed with eftate of
bondagCjand wearied with vnquietnes of confcicnce,thcy fled to the
fuccour of the Gofpell, & that therfore it was a peculiar frute of the
new teftamentjthat befidc the common law of the old tcftament they
were exempted fro thcfe euiIs.Moreouer,we wildeny that they were
fo endued with the fpirit of freedom and afluredncsjthat they did not
in fome parte feelc both fearc and bondage by the law. For howfoc-
uer they enioied that prerogatiuc which they had obtained by grace
of the Gofpell,yet were they fubied to the fame bondes and burdcs
of obferuation,that the commo people werc.Sith therfore they were
compelled to the carcfulU keepingc of thofe ceremonies, which were
the fignes of a fchcoling much hke vnto bondagCjand the handwry-
tinges whereby they confelTed thcmfelues gilty of finne , did not dis-
charge them from being bonde:itmay rightfully be faid,that in com-
parifon of vs they were vnder the lellament of bondage and feare,
while v/e haue refpeft to that common order of diftribution that the
Lord then vfcd with the people of Ifrael.
10 The three laft companfons that we haue rccitcd,arc ofthc law
and the Gofpel. Wherforc in them by the name of the Old teftamcnt
is meant the la we, and by the name ofthc New teftament is meant
the Gofpcl.The firft ftrerched further, for it compt ehendcth vndcr it
thepromifcs alfo that were publilhcd before the lawe, but whereas
Auguftinc
GodthcRcdemer. Lib.2. i8i
Auguftihc denieth that they ought to bcrcckcnedvnderthcnamc L'l>-?.
of tne oldc tcftament , therein he thought very well, and meant cuen ^^ ^**'
the fame thing that wc do nowe teach, for he hadde rcgarde to thofc "* ^ *"
fayinges of Hieremie and Paule,whcrc the olde tcftament is feuered
•from the wordc of mercic and grace. And this alfo he very aptely ad-
ioyncth in the fame place,that the children of promifc regcneiat of
God , which by faith working through loue.haue obeyed the com*
inaundemcnts , do from the beginning of the worldc belong to the
new Telbmct,and that in hope not of flefhly, earthly and temporall,
but fpirituall, heauenly,and eternall good thinges,principally bclec-
uing in thcMediatour,by whome they doubted not that the fpirit was
no: miniftred vnto them,both to do good} and to haue pardon fo oft
as they finned. For the fame thing it is that I minded to affirme, that
all ihc Saindcs whome the Scripture reherfeth to haue been from tlic
beginning of the worlde chofen by God, were partakers of the fclfe
fame bleffing with vs vnto eternall faluation. This difference there-
fore is bctwecne our diuifion and Auguftines : that oures (according
to that faying of Chrift:The lawe and the Prophets were vnto lohn: Mar.ss«
, from thenceforth the kingdome of God is preached) doth make 6i- »3-
ftindion bctweenethc cleereneffe of the Gofpcll, and the darker di-
ftribution of the wordethat went before : and Auguftine doth oncly
•feuer the weakncfle of the lawe from the ftrength of the Gofpeil.And
here alfo is to be noted coccrning the holy fathcrs,that they fo hucd
vnder the oldc tcftament, that they ftayed not there , but alway afpi-
rcd to the ncwe, yea and imbraced the aflfurcd partaking thereof. Foe
the Apoftie condemneth them of blindcneflc and accurfedneffe,
which being cotented with prefent fhadoweSjdid not ftretch vp their
mindc vnto Chrift. For (to fpeake nothing of the reft) what greater
blindcneflc can be imagined , than to hope foi the purging of finnc
by the killing of a beaft, than to feeke for the cleanfing of the fotilc
in oi4twarde fprinkeling of water? than to fccke to appeafe God with
coldc cercmonies,as though he were much dehted therewith? For to
all thefe abfurdities do they fall, that fticke faft in the obferuations of
the lawe without refpeft of Chrift.
1 1 The fifth drffcrence that we may adde,lieth in this:that vntill
the comming of Chrift the Lord had chofen out one nation, within
which he woulde keepc feuerali the couenant of his grace. When
the hieft did diftributc the nations , when he diuided the fonnesof
Adam (faith Mofcs)his people fell to his pofleftionrlacob the cordc I>eu.jf .
of his inheritance. In an other place he thus fpeaketh to tlje people: *'
Beholdc the heauen and earth and all that is in it, aie the Lord thy ,.
Cap. II, Of the knowledge of
Gods. He cleaued onely ro thy faihers.hc loued ihem,to chofe theiV
feede after th em eucn your felues out of all nations. Therefore be
voutchcfaued to graunt the knowledge of his name to that people
onely , as if they onely of all men belonged vnto him : he layed his
couenant as it werem their bofome ; to them he openly (hewed the
prefcncc of his Godhead:them he honored with ail prerogatiues.But
( to omit the reft of his benefites, andfpeakc that which onely herefs
to our purpofe) he bound them to him by the communicating of his
worde, that he might be called and compted their God, lr> the nieane
feafon he fuflfcred other nations to walke in vanitie , as though they
\^. 14. had not any entercourfe or any thing to do with him t neither did h«
itf , to helpe their deftrudion , geue them that which was onely the re-
medic > namely the preachmg of his worde . Therefore Ifraell was
then the Lordcs fonne that was his derling, other were ftraungers;
Kraell was knowen to him and receyuedinto his charge and prote-
ftion , other were left to their owne darkenefle : Ifracli was fandiHed
by God, other were prophane.'Ifrael was honored with the prefencc
of God,other were excluded from comming nie vnto him. But when
^ , the fuJlnefle of time was come, appointed for the reftorrng of all men,
iphe.2. ^"^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ reconciler of God and men was deliueredm dccdejthe
4. particion was plucked downe , which had fo long holden the mercy
jala.5. of God enclofed withm the boundes of irra€ll,& peace was preached
>f' 1 8 ^^ ^h**" ^^^^ ^'^^^^ ^3rrc of,euen as to them that were neere adioyned,
H3d»6i. that being together reconcilied to God, they might growe into one
people. Wherefore, nowe there is no relpcdof Greke or lewe , cir-
cumcifion or vncircumcifionjbut Chrift is all in all,to whome the na-
tions arc geuen for his inheritaunce, and the endesofthe earth for
his peculrar poffeflion , that vniuerfally without difference he might
haue dominion from fea to fea , and from the riuers to the vttermoft
cndes of the worlde.
1 2 Therfore the calling; of the Gentiles is a notable token, where-
by is clcarcly Ihewed the excellencieof the newcTeftament abouc
the oldc. It hadindeede bin before teftified by many, & moft plaine
oracles of the Prophetes,but fo as the perfourmance thereof was ftill
differred vnto thekingdome of Meflias. And Chrift him fclfe did not
»hil. 2. pfocede vnto it at the firft beginning of his preacliing , but difterred it
iat. 4 5 . To long vntrl that all the partes of our redemption being perfourmed,
-f • and the time of his abacement ended , he receyued of his father a
name that is aboue all names, before whome all knees (houlde bovvc.
For which caufe when this comienience of time was not yet fuliilled>
he faid to the woman of Chanaan, that he was not fern but to the loft
flicepc
GodthcRedemcn Lib.2. 182
fliecpe of the houfe of Ifraell . And he fuffrcd not his Apoftlcs at the
firft fending, to paflc thefe boundes«Go not ye,(faith he)into the way
of the Gentilcs,nor entre into the Cities of the Samariianes, but ra-
ther go yc to the loft flieepe of the houfe of IftacU. But howcfoeuer
it was before vttered by fo many tcftimonies , yet when the Apoftics
were firft to bcginnc it;j itfeemed foncweand ftrangc a thing vnto
them, that they were afraide of it , asof fome monfter. Truely very
fearefully and not without flicking at it,they firft did fct vpon it. And
no marueH, for it fcemed againft reafon , that the Lorde which by (b
many ages had chofen out Ifrael from all oihernations.ftiouldnowc
\ndo that choifc, as it were , fodenly changing his purpofc. It was in
deedefpoken of afore by prophecies : but theycouldc not geuclb
great hcede to the prophecics,as to be nothing moued with the new-
nelfe of the thing that they fawe . And thefe examples which the
Lorde had fticwed of the calling of the Gentiles that flioulde one day
come to pafle, were not fufficicnt to moue them. For bifide this that
' be hade called veey fcwc, he did after a certainc maner engrafFe them
into the houfcholde of Abraham, to adde them vnto his people as
percell of them : but by this gcnerall calling the Gentiles , were not
oriely made egall with the lewes , but alfo it appeared that they came
into the place of the lewes , that were become deade . And yet all
thofe ftrangcrs whome God hath before that time brought into the
bodie of the Church , were neuer made egall with the Icwes . And
therefore not without a caufe doth Paule fo cxtoll this myfteric hid- Cotu
den from ages and generations, and which he alfo faith to be mar- ***
uellous to the very Angles.
15 In thcfe fower or fiuc pointes, I thinke, 1 hauc well & faith-
fully fet forth the whole difference of the olde and ncwe Teftamcnt^
fo much as fufhceth to y fimplc ordre of teaching. But becaufc many
report this varietie in gouerning the Church, this diuers manner in
teaching , fo great alteration of vfages and ceremonies, to be a great
abfurditie : they are alfo to be anfwered before that we palTe forth to
other thinges. And that may be done (hortly, bycaufe the cbiedions
are not fo ftrong that they nede a curious confutation. It hangeth
not together ( fay they) that God which doth alway ftedfaftly agree
with him fclfe , flioulde futFer fo great an alteration, as afterwards to
difalow the fame thing, which he had before both con.maunded and
commended. I anfwere,that God ought not therfore to be compted
mutable,for that he applied diuerfe formes to diuerle ages,as he knew
to be cxpcdiet for euery one.If the husbandman apoint to his houfc-
holde one forte of bufincflc in wintcr,6c an other in rommer,(haU wc
Cap.ii. Of the knowledge of
therfore accufe him ofinconftanciCjOr thinkc that he fwaructh from
the right rule of husbandrie which agrceth with the continuall ordre
oFnaiure ? Likewife if a father of a houfeholde do inftrud,rule and
ordre his children of one forte in childhoode , of an other in youth,
and of an other m mans ftate,wc can not therefore fay that he is fickle
& forfakerh his owne purpofe.Why therfore do we charge God with
reproch of inconftancie, for that he hath feuered the diuerfitie of ti-
mes with fit and agrcable markcs ? The laft finiilitudc ought fully to
fatisfie vs. Paule maketh the lewcs like vnto childrenj& Chriftians to
. yongmen.What difordre is there in this goucrnement of God thathc
helde them in their childifh leflbnsjwhich accordingc to the capacity
of their age were fie for them , and inftrudcd vs with ftronger and as
it were more rhanly difcipline ? Therefore herein appeareth the con-
ftancic of God , that he taught one fclfe fame dodrine in all ages,
and continucthin requiring the fame worlhippe of his name , which
he commaunded from the beginning . But wheras he chaunged the
outwarde forme and manner thereo^in that he {hewed not him felfe
fubied to change : but fo farrc he tempered him k\k to the capacitic
of man^which is diuerfe and chaungeable.
14 But whenfe (fay they) commeth this diuerfitie , but bycaufc
God willed it to be fiich ? Coulde he not as well from ihe beginning
as Ims the comming of Chriftjteuele the etcrnall life in plaine wordes
without any figures,inftrud: thofe that arc his with a few facramentcs
and eafy to perceaue,geue his holy fpirite,and poure abroad his gra»
cc throughout the whole worlde? This is euen like as if they rtioulde
quareli with God for that he hath created the worlde fo late , (ith he
might haue created if from the beginning : or for that his will was to
hauc enterchaunged courfes betwene winter and fommer, bctwenc
day and night.But as for vs,euen as al Godly men ought to thinke,lcr
vs notdoubte that vyhatfoeuer God hath done , is wifely andrighte-
oufly done,although oftentimes we know not the caufe why it ought
fo to hauc been done.For that were to take prefumptuoufly to much
vpon vs , not to geue God leaue to haue the caufes of his owne pur*
pofe fecrct to himfelfe from vs. But it is meruellous ( fay they) that
he now rcfufeth and abhorreth the (acrificing of beaftes, and all that
furniture of the Leuiticall priefthode,wherewirh in the olde time he
was dehted As though ihefe outward and trafitoric thinges did delitc
God , or any way moae affection in him. We haue already faid that
he did none of thefe for his owne caufe,but difpofed them all for the
faluation of men. If a Phificion do heale a yong man after one very
good meane from bis difcafcand afterward do vfc an other maner of
healing
God theRedemer. Lib.2. 18}
heaUng with the fame man being olderfliall wc therefore fay.that he
hath rcfulcd the manner of healing which before pleafeJ him , but
father continuing ftill in the fame , he hath confideration of age ? So
behoued it,that Chrift being abfenr,(houldc be expreflcd in figure by
one fort of fignes,and by an other fort be before Ihcwcd that he was
to comcand it is mete that now being already dcliucred,he be repre-
fcntcd by other fignes. But as concerning Gods callyng , nowe at the
comming of Chrift more largely fpread abfode among all peoples
than it was bcfore,and the graces of the holy ghoft more plentcoufly
poured out , who, I pray you,can denie it to be right, that that God
naue in his ownc hande and will the difpofing of his ownc graces, to
geuc light to what nations it pleafeth him ? to raife vp the preaching
of his wordc in what places it pleafeth him ? to geuc what dodrine
and howc great profiting and fucceffe of dodrine it pleafeth him ? and
in what ages he will , to take away the knowledge of his name out of
the worlde for their vnthankefulncflc ? and againe when he will to re-
ftorc it foi*his owne mercic ? We fee therefore, that the cauillations
are to much vnmectcwherwith wicked men do in this point di.'quiet
the mindcs of the (imple,to make them call cither the righteoufneiTc
of Godjor the faith of the Scripture into doubce.
The xij. Chapter.
That it behoitedy that Chrtjl , to perfortre the office ef the
Mtdtatour , shoulde be made man,
NOwCjit much behoued vs that he fhouldc be both God and
man, which llioulde be ourMediatour. If a manaskc of the
necefTitie,it was not in deede a limple or ablblutc neciflitic,
as they commonly call it,but U proceded from the heauen-
!y decree , wherevpon hanged all the faluation of men. But the moft
merciful f a thcr apoinred that which fliould be beft for vs. For wheras
our owne inicjuities had,as it v/ere,catt a cloude berwene him and vs,
and vttcrly excluded vs from the kingdomc of hcauen,no man couldc
be the interpreter for reftoring of our peace,but he that could atteine
vnto God.But who coulde hauc atteined vnto him?couldc any of the
fonnes of Adam? But all they did with their father fhunne the fight
of God for fearc. Coulde any of the Aiigels? but they alfo had necde
of a hcadjby whofc knitting together they might perfedly and vnfe-
ucrably cleaue vnto God. What then? It was paft all hope, vnleflc the
very maieftie of God would defcend vnto vs,for we coulde not afcede
vnto it. So it behoued that the fonne of God (houlde become for vs
Immanuell^that is^God with vs ; and that in this fort^that by mutual!
Cap. 1 2 . O f the knowledge of
ioyningjhis godhqd and the nature of man might growe into one to-
gether . Otherwife neither coulde the neerenefl'e be neerc enough,
nor the alhance ftrong enough for vs to hope by , that God dwelleth
witli vs. So great vas the difagreement betwene our filthinefle , and
the moil pure cleannefTe of God. Ahhough man had ihnd vndefilcd
without any fpot, yet was his eftate to bafe to atceine to God with-
out a Mediator. What coulde he then do being plonged downe into
death and hell with deadly fall , defiled with fo many fpottes , linking
with his owne corruption , and ouerwhelmed with all accurfednefle ?
t.Tim. Therefore not without caufc , Paule meaning to fet forth Chrift for
^1- the Mediator , doth expreflely recite that he is Man . One Mediator
( faith he) of God and man , the man lefus Chrift . He might hauc
iaidfGod: orattheleaft he might haue left the name of Man as
well as of God. But bycaufe the holy Ghoft fpeaking by his mouth,
knewe our weakenefle : therefore to prouide for it in time , he vfed a
moft tit remedvjfetting among vs the fonne of God familiarly as one
of vs.Therfore leaft any man Inoulde trouble himfelf to kfiow where
tlie Mediatour is to be fought, or which way to comme vnto him, in
naming Man , he putteth vs in minde that he is nere vnto vs , yea fo
nere that he toucheth vs , for afmuch as he is our owne flcfh. Truely
he raeaneth there euen the fame thing that in an other place is fee •
out with moe wordes : that we haue not abifhop that can not haue
Hebr.4. companion ©four infirmities, for afmuch as he was in all thinges
a 5. tempted as we are, onely finne excepted.
1 That fliall alfo appere more plainely,if we confider how it was
no meane thing that the Mediatour had to do; that is, fo to reftorc vs
into the fauour of God,as to make vs of the children of men, the chil-
dren of God:of the hcires of hell,the heires of the kingdome of hea-
uen.Who could do that, vnleffc the fonne of God were made alfo the
fonne of manne , and fo take oures vpon him to conuey his vnto vs,
and to make that oures by grace, which was his by nature? Therefore .
by ths carneft we truft, that we arc the children of God , bycaufe the
naturall fonne of God hath {hapen for himfelfe a body of our body,
flcfli of our flefli , bones of our bones , that he might be all one with
vs. He difdaincd not to take that vpon him which was propre vnto
vSjto make againc that to belong to vs v/hich he had propre to him-
felfe, and that fo in common together with vs, be might be both the
fonne oi God and the fonne of man. Herevpon commeth that holy
brocherhode which he commendeth with his owne mouth when he
Iho.xo. faith : I go vp to my father and your farher , my God and your God.
1 7* By this mcane is the inheritance of the kingedome of heaucn aflured
vnto
Gdd theRedemcr, Lib.2, 184
TOto v$ : for that the onely fonne of God,ro whome it wholly did
proprely bclong.hath adopted vs into his brethren : bycaufe if we be
brcthren,then are we partakers of the inhcritaunce. Moreouer it was Rom.8,
for the fame caufc very profitable , that he which fiioulde be our re- 17.
deemcr, iTiouIdc be both very God and very manne. It was his office
to fw alio we vp death : who coulde do that but life it felfc ? It was his
office loouercome finne : who coulde do that but righteoufnefle it
fclfe ? It was his office to vanquiffi the powers of the worlde and of
the aircrwho coulde do that but apowcr aboue both worlde and aire:
Nowe in whofe pofleffion is lifcjOr righteoufnefTcjOr the empire and
power of heauen , but in Gods alone ? Therefore the moli merciful
God, in the perfone of his onely begotten Tonne , made himfelfe our
redemer,whcn his will was to haue vs redemed.
J Another principall point of our reconciliation with God was
this that man which had loft by his difobedicncejfhoulde for remedy
fet obedience againft it, Ihouldc Huisfic the iudgcmcntof God,and
pnye the penaltie of finne. Therefore there came forth the true man,
our Lorde 1 he put on the perfone of Adam , and toke vpon him his
name to entre into his ftede in obeyeng his father , to yeld our Hefh
the price of the fatisfadion to the luft iudgement of God , and in the
fame flefh fuftcr the paine that we had deferued.For afmuch as there-
fore neither being onely God he coulde fcle death , nor being onely
man he coulde oucrcome death , he coupled the nature of man with
the nature of God , that he might yeldc the one fubied to death to
faiisfie for (inncs,and by y power of the other he miyht wraftle with
death, and get vidorie for vs. They rherfore thatfpoile Chrift cither
ofhisgodhed or of his manhode, do in dcede either diminifli his
maiefty and doryjor obfcure his goodnes : but on the other (ide they
do no lefTe wrong vnto men whofe faith they do therby weaken and
ouerihrow, which can not ftad butrefting vpon ths foundatio. Belidc
that , it was to be hoped , that the Rcdemcr fi.oulde be the fonne of
Abraham and Dauid , which God had promifed in the lawc and the
Prophctes.Wherby the godly mindes do gather this other frute,thae
being by the very courfc of his pedigree brought to Dauid and A-
braham,£hey do the more certainly know that this is the fame Chnft
that was fpokcn of by fo many oracles. But this which I euen nowc
declaredjis principally to be holden in minde,thnt the common natu-
re betwcne him and vs is a pledge of our feiowfhip with the fonne of
God:that he clothed with our flefh vanquished death and finne toge-
ther, that the vidorie fo might be oures and the triumph oures : that
he otfred vp for facrifice the flefli that he receyued of vs , that hauing
Cap.i 2. Of the knowledge of
made fatisfadion he might wipe away our giltinefTc , and appeafc the
iuft wrath of his father.
4 He that fhalbe diligently hcdefull in confidering ihefe thinges
as he ought, wil eafily negled chefe wandring fpeculations that rauilh
vnto them hghtfpintes and defirous of noueltie: of which fort is,
that Chrift fhould haue been man,ahhough there had been no neede
of rcmedie to redeemc mankinde. I graunt that in the firft degree of
creation , and in the ftate of nature vncorrupted , he was fet as head
ouer Angels and mcn.For which caufe Paule callcth him the firft be
Col. I. gotie of all creatures. But fith ail the Scripture crieth outjihat he was
" ^ clothed with flelh, that he might be the Redeemer : it is to much rafh
prcfumptio po imagine any other caufe or ende.To what cnde Chnft
was promifed from the beginning, it is well enough knowcn:euen to
reftore the world fallen in ruincjand to fuccour men being loft.Therc-
fore vnder the lawe , the image of him was fet forth in facrificcs , to
make the faithfuU to hope that God woulde be mercifull to them,
when after fatisfaiftion made for finne, he rtioulde be reconciled. But
whereas in all ages , euen when the lawe was not yet publifhed , the
Mediatour was neuer promifed without bloud : we gather that he was
apointcd by the eternall counfell of God to purge the filthineffe of
men, for that the (heding of bloud is a token of expiation . The Pro-
phetes fo preached pf him,tbatthey promifed that he Hioulde be the
reconciler of God and mcn.That one fpecially notable teftimonie of
le-^i. j^. £^j^-g j^^^j fufficc vs for all,whf re he foretellethjthat he (Tialbc ftricken
with the hande of God for the finnes of the pcople,that the chaftife-
mcnt of peace llioulde be vpon him ; and that he (houlde be a prieft
that (houlde offer vp himfelfe for facrificerthat of his woundes (liould
come health to othcrrand that,bycaufe all haue ftrayed and been fcat-
tercd abrode like fheepe,therefore it pleafcd God to punifh him, that
he might beare the iniquities of all. Sith wc hcare that Chrift is pro-
perly apointed by God to helpe wretched finneis , 'who fo eucr paf-
fcth beyond ihcfe boudes, he doth to much follow foolilh cuiiofitie,
Nowe when himfelfe was ones come,he affirmed this to be the caufe •
ofhis comming, toappeafe God , and gather vs vp from death into
lohn. 1. life. The fame thing did the Apoftles teftifie of him . So lohn before
9' that he teacheth that the Worde wrs made flefti,declareth of the fal-
ling away of man. But he himfelfe is to be heardc before all, when ha
lohn. I. fpcakcth thus of his ownc office : So God loued the worlde , that he
»4' gaue his only bcgotie fonne,that who fo euer beleueth in him fhould
- , not pcril'hjbut haue euerlafting life. Againe : The hpurc is come that
,^. "' ^' the dead (hall hcare the voice of tlie fonnc of Qod,^ they that hearc
GodtheRedemcr. Lib.2. 185
it^fhall fiuc. I am the refurrc^ion and life.-he thai bclcueth in mc, aU Iohn.5.
thdushhc be dead, (hall Ihic. Againe. The fonne oFman cometh to ^*'
faue that which was loft. Againe. The whole necdc not a Phyficiaiv j^^^ ' p|
I Ihoiilde ncuer make an ende , if 1 Hiouldc rehcrfe all. The Apofties Mat.5).
^o all with one confent call vs to this fountaine: And trucly if he had
not come to reconcile God,the honor of the pnefthode fhonld hauc Heb. 5.1
come to nought . For afmuch as the pricft apointed mcane bcrwenc
God and man to m.ike intcrceflion; and he (liould not be our rightc i.Cor
oufncfi'e, bycaufe he was made a facrifice for vs,that God flioiild not 5. j^. ^
impute hnnes vnto vs. Finaliy,he (hculde be' fpoiled of all Jic hono-
rable titles, wherewith the Scripture doth fct him our. And alfo that
faying of P.aulefhouldc prouevaine, that that which was impoflible R«.8.?.
to the law,God hath fent his owne fonne, that in hkcncs ot the fieOi
of (inne he flioulcle (acisHc for vs. Neither will this ftand that he tea- Tir. j .
cheth in an other place, that in this glaflcapeared the goodnefleof **•
God and his infinite goodneffe towarde-men, when CJirift was geuen
to be the Redeemer. Finally,ihc Saipture eucry where afllgncfh no
other cndc , why the fonne of God woulde take vpon him our flcHi,
at>d alfo receiucd tiiis commaundement of his father* but to be made
a facrifice to appeafc his father towarde vs. So it is written , and fo it Ii'f'2 4
behoued that Chrift fhould fufter,and repentance be preached in his J^'
name. Therefore my father louf th me,bycaufe I gcue my life for the ^^ '
fheepe , this commaundement he gaue mc . As Mofes lifted vp the lohn. j
Serpet in the dcfertjfo muft the fonne of man be lifted vp. In an other » 4-
place. Father, faue me from this boure. But I am therfcre come eucn ^" •* ' .
to this houre. Father glorifie th^ fonne. Where he plainely fpeaketh jg[
of the ende why he tokc flefli , that he might be a facrifke and fatif-
fadion to do away finne . After the fame forte doth Zacharie pro- Luci.
nounce, that he came according to the promile geuen to the fathers, i>.
to geue light to them that fate in the fliadow of death. Let vs remem-
ber that all thefc thinges ate fpoken of the fonne of God : in whorac
Paule in an other place tcftificth , that all the treafures of knowledge C0I.2.
and wifedome are hidden, and by(idc whomehe glorilieth that he i.Coi.
Icnoweth nothing. *•*•
J If any man take exception & fay^that none of all thefe thinges
pcoue th? corrarie.but that the fame Chrift that redcmed men being
damned , might alio in putting on their flefh tcftitie his loue towarde
thcm,bcing preferucd & fafe. The aunfwere is lliort,that for afmuch
a« the holy Ghott pronounceth , that by the etemaU decree of God
thefe two thinges were ioyned together, that Chrift fhould be our rc-
decmer,and alfo partaker of all otic nature vvith v^ therefore it ii not
AA
Cap.i 2 . Of the knowledge of
lawctull for vs to fearch any further. For who (o euer is tickled wirfi
dcfii e to knowc any more, he being not contented with the vnehan-
I" cable ordinance of God, doth fhewc alfo that he is not contented
>vith the fame Chrift that was geuen vs to be the priccof our redem-
ption But Paule not onely rcherfeih to what ende he was fentc, but
alio climbing to the hye mifterie of the predcftination , he very fitly
reprefleth all wantonnefle and itching de(Jre of mans wit. The father
Ephe 4. chofe vs in Chrift before the creation of the worlde , to make vs his
5 • fonncs by adoption, according to the purpofe of his will : and he ac-
cepted vs in his beloued Tonne , in whom we haue redemption by his
bloude. Truely here is not the fall of Adam fet before as though it
were formoft in time,but is Ih^wed what God determine^ before all
ages, when his wil was to htipe the miferie of mandkinde. If the ad-
uerfarie obkdc againc, that this purpofe of God did hang vpon the
fall of man which he did fofcfce: it is enough and more forme, to
fayjthat they with wicked boldnefle breakc forth to fainc them a new
Chnftjwho fo euer fu0er themlilues to fearche for more, or hope to
know more of Chrift tha God hath forcapointcd them by his fecrct
decree . And for good caufe did Paule , after he had fo difcourfcd of
Ephe. 3. ti^e proper office of Chrift , wifli to the Ephefians the fpirite of vn-
* ^' dcrftandmg, to comprehend what is the length, hcygtlj, bredth,and
depth,euen thclouc of Chrift that furmounteth all knowledge : cuen
"as if of purpofe he would fet barres about our mindcs,that when mc-
tio is made of Chrift,they ftiould not,be it ncuer fo litk/waruc from
the grace of reconcjUation.Wherefore, fithe this is a faithful! faying
iTim. (as Paule tcftificth)that Chrift is cdRie to faue finncrs,! do gladly reft
>• 5 >. in the fame. And wheras in an other place the fame Apoftle teachcth,
that the grace which is no we difclo(cd by the Gofpell, wasgeuen vs
in Chrift before the times of the worlde : I determine that I ought
conftantly to abide therein to the ende. Againft this modeftie Ofian-
der carpeth vniuftly which hath againe in this time vnhappily ftirred
this quelhon before lightly moued by a fewe. He accufeth them of
prefumption that fay,tliat the fonne of God fhould no: haue appered
in the flcfh,if Adam had not fallen,bycaufe this inuention is confuted
by no teftimonie o( Scripture . As though Paule did not bridle fro-
ward curiofitie > when after he had fpokcn of redemption purchaced
Tim.3,5 by Chrift, he by and by commaundeth to auoidc foolifh qucftions.
The madncffe of fomc did burft out fo farrc,that while they difordre-
ly coueted to fcemc wicty^ they mooed this queftion , whether the
Sonne of God might haue taken vpon him the nature of an Alfe,
. This monftruourncs which all the godly do worthily abhorrc as de-
tcfta-
GodtheRcdcmcr. Lib.2. i8^
teftablc , let Ofiandcr confute with this pretenfc that it is ncucr ex-
prefly confuted in the Scripture. As though when Paulc accontprcth
nothing precious or worthy to be knowcn , but Chrift cruciHed , he
doth therefore admit an Afle lobe the author of faluation . There-
fore he that in an other place reportcth , that Chnft by theeternall ^^^ *"*'
counfcll ot his father was ordeincd to be a head to gather all thinges
together : will neuer the more acknowledge An other that hath no.
office of rcdcming apointed him.
6 But as for the principle? that he braggeth of,it is vciy trifiing.Hc
would hauc ir,that man was created after the image oi God, bycaufe
he was fafhioned after the patemc of Chnft to come , that he might
rcf&mble bim,whome the father had already decreed to clothe with
our flefh. Wherevpon he gathereth,that if Adam had neuer fallen fro
his Hrft and vncorrupted originall ftatc , yet Chnft fl.ould haue bene
man. How trifling this is & wreftcd5all men that haue founde iudgc-
mentjdo eahly percciuc of thecpfeluesrln the meane time fii ft he thin-
keth that he hath fccne what was the image of God, that forfoth the
glone of God did not bncly fl^ne in thofe excellent giftes wherewith
he was gamiftied, but alfo that God himfclfecffentially dwelt in him.
But as for mc , although I graunt that Adam did bearc the image of
God, in fo much as he was ioyned to God, (which is the true & hyeH
perfedion of dignitie) yet 1 fay, that the hkcncffe of God is no where
els to be fought, but in thofe markes of ex'cellencie wherewith he had
garnifhed Adam aboue other lioing creatures . And that Chrift waf
then the image of God , all men doe graunt with one confcnt , and
therefore that what fo euer excellencie was grauen in Adam,ir proce-
ded from this, that by the onely begotten fonnc he approched to the
gloric of his creator . Therefore man was created after the image of Geae.i.
God, in whome the creators will was to hauc his glorie fcene as in »7»
a looking glalle. To this degre€ of honour was he aduaunced by the
benefite of the onely begotten fonne: But I fay further,that the fame
Tonne was a common head as w ell to Angels as to men , fb that the
fame dignitie that was beftowed vpon man,did alfo belong vnto An-
gels. For when we heare them calJed the children of God,it were in-
conuenient to dcnic , that there is fomthing in them wherein they fc-
femble their father. Nowcif hiswiUwas to hauehisgloiiecobe re-
prcfented as w^l in Angels as in mennc , and to be feene in both na-
tures, Ofiander doth fondcly trifle in fayinge, that the Angels were
then fct behmde mennc, bycaufe they did not bearc the image of
Chrift. For they coulde not continually enioy the prcfcnt beholding
af God jVnleflc they were like liim. And Paul icachcth.that men are Cah. ».
A A ij. to.
Cap.i2. Ofthe knowledge of
no orhcrwife renewed after the image of God.but if they be coupled
with Angcls,that they may cleaiie together vnder one hcad.Finally,
jf we belcuc Chrift , this ihalbe our laft felicitie , to be made of hke
forme to the Angels,\vhen we (halbe receyucd vp into heauen.But if
Oliander will conclude , that the originall paterne of the image of
God was in Chrift as he is man , by the (ame reafon a manne may
fay, that Cl^fift muftneedes haue been partaker of the nature of An-
gelsjbycaufe the image of God pcrteineth alfo to them.
7 Therefore, Ofiandcr hath no cailfc to feare,that God fliouldc
be found a lier, vnlcflcit had ben firft ftcdfaftly and vnchangeably de-
creed in his minde , to haue his fonne incarnate: bycaufe if the inte-
gritic of A dam had not fallen , he flioulde with the Angels haue ben
like vnto God , and yet it {hoiilde not therefore haue ben ncctffaric,
that the fonne of God flioUlde be made either man or Angel. And in
vame he feareth that abfurditie,lcaft vnlefle the vnchangcable coun-
fell of God had been before the creation of man that Chrift fhouldc
be borne , not as the rcdemer but a$ the firft man , he {houlde haue
loft his prerogatiue : for afmuch as nowe he fhoulde be borne man
onely by an accident caufe,that is to reftorc man kindc being loft, and
• fo it might be gachered thcrevpon , that Chrift was created after the
image of Adam . For why {houlde he fo muchc abhorrc that which
Hebr.4. the Scripture fo openly teacheth,that he was made like vnto vs in all
' 5' thingcs.exccpt finne? Wherevpon Luke doubteth not to rccken him
g ^* the fonne of Adamin his Gcnealogie. And I woulde faine know why
i.Cor. Paulc calleth Chrift the fecond Adam,but bycaufe the eftate of man
X 5.47. was appointed for him,that he might raifc vp the poftcritic of Adam
out of their ruine. for if he we re in order before that creation, he
fhoulde haue been called the firft Adam. Ofiander boldly affirmeth,
that bycaufe Chrift wasalredy before knowcn man in the minde of
God , men were formed after the fame pateme. But Paule in naming
him the fecond Adam , fetteth meane betwene the firft beginning of
man aud the reftitution which we obteine by Chrift , the fall of man
wherby grew the necefllty to haue nature reftored to her firft degree.
Wherupo it foloweth jthat this fame was the caufe why the fonne of
G6d was borne to become man . In the meane time , Ofiander rea-
foncth ill and vnfauorily,that Adam,fo long as he hadftande without
falling , (houlde haue bin the image of himfclfe and |jot of Chrift. I
aunfwerc by the contrarie , bycaufe though the fonne of God bad
ncuer put on fle(h , neucrthelefle both in the body and in the foulc
of man flioulde haue fliincd the image of God , in the bright beamcs
whereof it alway appercd^that C^iftis vcrily the headland hath the-
fouc*
God the Redemcr. Lib.2 . . 1 87
fducraignc fupremicic in ail. And Co is that foolifli futilerie aflbyled,
which Ofiandcr blowcth abroadc , that the Angels (houldehaue lac-
ked this head^vnleflc it had bencpurpofed by God to clothe his*
fonoe with flcfli,yca though there had bine no fault of Adam. For he
doth to ralhly fnatche holde of that which no manne in his right wit
will graunt , that Chrift hath no fupremicic ouer Angels , that they
(houldc hauc him for their Prince , but in fo much as he is mm . But
it is eafily gathered by the wordes of Paule , that in as much as he is Colof.j
' the eternall wordc of God,he is the firft begotten of all creatures :not i j.
that he is create , or ought to be reckened among creatures : but by-
catife the ftate of the worlde in incegritie , rfuch as it was at the be-
ginning garni(hcd with excellent beautic,had no other origmall : and
then , that in as much as he was made man , he was the Hrlt beeotten
of the dead . For the Apoftle in one fhorte claufe fetteth forth both Colofli
thefepointestobc conhdered: that all thinges were create by the '^
ionnc , that he might beare rule ouer Angels : and that be was made , ^ ° *
mdn , chat he might beginne to be the reden\cr. Of like rgnorauncc
is it that he faith, that men fhoulde not haue had Chrirt to their king,
if he had not bene man. As though thekingdome of God coulJe
not ftand , if the eternall fonne of God , althotigh not clothed with
the flefh of man, gathering together both Angels and menmtothe
felowfliip of his heaucnly gloric and life , (houlde himfelfe beare the
foueraintie. But in this falfe principle he is alway deceyued,or rather
deceyueth himfelfe , that the Church flioulde haue bene without a
head , vnlefle Chrift had appeared in the flefh . As though , euen as
the Angels cnioyed him their hcade,he coulde not likewife by his di-
nine power rule ouer men, and by the fecret force of his fpirite quic-
ken and nourifli them like his owne body, till being gathered vp into
heauen, they might enioy all one life with the Angels . Thefe trifles
that I haue hetherto confuted,Ofiander accompteih for mofl ftrong
oracles ; eaen fo as being dronke with the fwcetenefle of his owne
fpecuUtions,hc vfeih to blowe out fonde Bacchus crieis of matters df
ndthihg . But this one that he bringeth after , he faith is much more
ftrongjthat is the prophecie of Adam, which,reyng his wife faid, this Gen. i*
nowe is a bone of my bones , and flcfli of my Hefli . But howe pro- »8'
ueth he that to be a prophecie ? Bycaufe in Matthew Chrift geuefh
the fame faying to God. As thotigh that what fo eucr God hath fpo-
ken by men , contcyneth fome prophecie . Let Oftander feeke pro-
phecies in euery ccJmmdiundcment of the lawe , which , it is certaifte
to haue come from God' the author of them. Befide that, Chrift:
(hould hauc bene gtoffeand earthly, if he had rtfted vpon the htetall
"•■^ A A iij.
Cap. 13. Of the knowledge of
fciile. Bycaufe he fpcakcin not of ihc mifticali vnion whercvnto he
b.ith vouthefaued to rcceiue his church^but only of fairhfulneffe bc-
* twene man and wjfc:for this caufe he tcacheth,th3t Gf d prouounced
that man and wife Hialbc one Ht(h , that no man fhouldc attempt to
breakethatinfolublcknttt by diuorce. If Ofiandtr loch this fimplfij
citi<; , let him blame Chnft , forthat he led not liis difciples further
to a miiicricin more furtely expounding the faying of his fathcr.Nei-
>he. J. ther yet doth Paule maiiKcine hiScrioui',which after he had faid that
^' • we arefleOi ofthefleHi of Chrift,byand by addethjthat this is a" great ^*
milKrie , for his pu:pofe was noi to tell m what meaning Adam fpakc
it bur vndcr the figure ahd fimihtude of manage.to (et forth rhcholy
coupluig together 5 that makeih vsonc with Chnft. And fo doe the
wordes found.Bycattfc when he tjeucth warning that he fpeaketh this
of Chnft and his church>hc doth as it were by way of corrcdion, fc-
acre the fpintuall loyning of Chnft and his church from the lawe of
mariage, Whcieforcthis fickle reafoneafily vaniflieth away . And I
thinke I needc no more to'ihakc vpany more of that fort of chaffc,
bycaufc the vmitie of them ail his Tone found out by rhis fliort con4
fucation. But ihfs fobrietic fliall aboundaotly fuffice to kedc foundljr
the children of God ? that when the fulnefle of times was come , the
fonnc o^ God was lent, m ide of worn jn,madc ?nder the lawe , to tt-i
dccmc tbetn that were vnder the lawe.
The xiij. Chapter.
Thdt Chriji tck* vpon him tht trtt* ftibjtance of the flefh of nran.
NOwe, vnlcfTc I be dccciued , it were fuperfluous to cntreatc
againe or the godhead of Chrift , which haih already in an
Other place ben proued with plaine and ftrong tcftimoniesi ,
It remamcch rhcrcfore to be fc^ nc , howe be being clothed
with our flefh, hath fulhlkd the orifice of Mediarour. The truethof
his humaine nature hath in the oldc time ben impu^^ned both by the
Manichees and the Marcionitcs : of whome , theMarcioaites faintd
a ghoft in ftedeof the body of Chtift , and the Mimchees dreamed
that he had a heautnly flefli . But both many and . ftrong teftimonics
c»f the Scripture do ftand a-jjainft them both. For the blelllng is pro*
mifcd neither in a heauenly fcedc,norin the codterfaite (hape of man,
but in the Cccdc of Abraham and lacob. Neither is the eternal throne
nd 3 $. promifed to a man made of aire , but to the fonne of Dauid & to the
[• fiute ofhiswombe. Therefore being deliueredin th e flefli, he is cal-
^^ '^y kd the fonne of Daiiid and Abraham ; doc bycaufc he i^ onely borne
of
GodtheRcdemcr. Lib.2. i88
of th« wombc of the Virginc , and create in the aire , but becaufe ( as MatM,
Paule expoundech it) he is according to the fielh made of the fcede of '•
Dauid : as in an other place the Apoftlc tcachech , that he dcfcendcd * "
of the lewcs. For which caufe the Lord himfelfe not contented v/iih Rom.^.
the bare name of man , doth oftentimes call himfelfe the fonnc of 5.
man, meaning to cxprefl'e more plainly that he wa> man cruely ilfued
of the fcede of mankinde.Sith the holy Ghoft hath fo oft by fo many
mcanes with fo great diligence and fimplicitic declared a thing noc
obfcure of it felfe , who wouldc haue thought any men to bcifo llia-
meiefle as to pretimc yet to fpread miftcs to darken Jt ? And yet we
haue other teftimonies at handjif we lilted to hcape vp more of them. •
As is that faying of Paule: that God fent his fonne made of woman. GjI-4«4
And innumerable other places , whereby appeareth that he was fub-
iedto hungre,thirrt,colde,& other infirmities of our'naturc. But out
of many thefe are chicHy to be chofen , that may moft auailc to ediHe
our mindes in true confidence. As, where it is faid, that he gaue not Hebr.i,
fo great honour to the Angels , as to take their nature vpon him : but i^-
toke our nature, that in flefh & bloud he might,by death,deftroy him
that had^ power of death. Againe , that by bcncfite of that com-
municating we are reckened his brethren . Againe,that he ought to Hebr.r.
Iiaue bine made like,vnto his brcthren,that he might be made a mcr- »»• and
cifuU and faithfull interccffour ; that we haue not a Bifliop that can [7*.
not be compatient of our infirmities. And fuch like. And for the fame , / '^
purpofe ferueth that which we touched a htle befoie,that it behoued
thatthefinncsof the worldefhouldebcclcapfcdinourBelhtWhich ^
Paule plainely affirmeth . And truely , what fo euer the father hath ,
geuen to Chrift,ic dbih therefore belong to vs,bccaufe he is the head,
from which the whole body being knit toeerher , groweth into one.
Yca,and otherwife that will not agree tog«her,which is faid.-that the I«5in. i.
Spiritcwas geuen him without meafure , that all we Ihouldedrawe ^^*
of the fulnefie thereof. For afmuch as there is no^r cater abfurditic
than to fay , that God is enriched in his elTence by any accidental!
gifie. And for this caufe Chrift faith in an other place ; 1 do fandi- l^^. » T"*
fie my felfe for them. - . *^*
2 As for the places that they bring forth to confirmc their crrour,
they do to vnapily wreft them , and they nothing preuaile by their
trifling futtelties, when they goe about to wipe away thofethinge*
that I haue alleged for our part. Marcion imagincth that Chrjft did
put on a fantaftical body in ftede of a true body rbecaufc in fome pla-
ces it ig faidjthat he was made after the likencffe of man,and that he PhiU*.
was foundc ia (hapc as a manne. But fo he nothing weycth what js 7*
A A iiij.
Cap.13. Of theknovvledgc of
Paules purpofe in that place . For his meaning 1$ not to teach what
manner of body Chrift tokc vpon him , but that whereas he might
hauc rtiewed forth his godhead , he made none other Hiewc of him-
felfejbut as of in abieAand vnregard«d man.For,to exhorte vs by hif
example to fubmi(rion,he Hiewethjthat for afmuch as he was God,he
might haue by and by fet forth his glory to be fecnc to the worldc:
but yet that he gaue ouer fome of his owne lightjand of his owne ac-
cord abaced himfclfe , bycaufe he did put on the image of a feruane
and contended with that biimilitic , fuffied his godhed to be hidden
with the vcilc of the flc{h. Hcdothnothcreteach what Chuit was,
but liow hi behaued himfelfc. And alfo by the whole procefle of the
texte it is eafily gathered, that- Chi ift was abaccd in the true nature of
mannc. For what meaneth this, that in {hnpe he was foundc as man,
but that for a liiiic the giorie of his godhead did not ihine forthjbut
only the fhapc of man appeared in bale and abiedcftate? For oihcr-
*et.}. wife that place of Peter couldenot ftandetogcthcr,thac he was dead
• . in- the flefii, but quickened in the fpirite , if the fonne of God had not
(-QJ. bene weakc in the nature of man: which Paule exprefltth more plaine-
,4. * ly in fayeng, that he fuffred by rcafon of the weakeneiTctrfjheflefli.
'or. And herevnto ferueth the exaltation : bycaufe it is cxprcflely laid,
47- that Chrift attcincd a new glorie ;|tftcr that he abated himfelfc, which
coulde not well agree to befpoktn of any jbutofamanhauing flefh
and fouie . Manichecs framed Chntt a body of aire , bycaufe Chnfl
is called the fecond Adam , heauenly of heauen . But ncuher in that
place doth the Apoftic liring in a heauenly efl'ence of )<tie body , but
a fpirituall force which being poured abrodc by Chrilt, doth quicken
v^, Nowe , as we haue already fcene , Peter and Paulc doc feuer the
fame from hisfleihe . But rather that doftrine which is receiued a-
mong the true teachers , concerning the flclh of Chiift , is very well
proucd by that place . For ifChrift had not all one nature of body
with vs , it were a very vain'e argument , that Paulc with fuch vehe-
-o*"' mencic followeth : that if Chrift be rifen againe , we (hall alfo rife a-
' * gjine : and if wc do not rife, then that Chrift alfo is not rifcn. By
what cauillacions fo cuer cither the oldc Manichees or their new Dif-
ciplcs goe about to cfcape , they ihall not winde them felucs away.
Jt IS a fowle Huftcthat they fondely &y,that Chrift is called the fonne
of manne , in fo much as he is profMfed of menne . For it is plainc,
that after the Hebtewe phiafe, very man in deede is called the Sonne
of manne. And Chrift without doubte keptc the phrafe of his owne
tongue. Alfo it ought to make no queftion,what ou^ht tobe vnder-
ftanded by the children of Adam. And (not to go farre of) the place
of the
GodtheRedemer. Lb.2 1S9
•f the eight PialmCjwhich the Apoftles apply to Chrift^ialbc fuffi-
cicnt enough : What is man that thou art mindcfull of him , or the
fonne of man , that thou vhfiteft liim ? In this figure is cxprefl'ed the
true manhoode of Chrift . For though he were not immediatly be-
gotten of a raorcall fathcr,yet his race came fro Adam. For elfe that
pbcc could not ftande which we haue already alleaged that Chrilt is
made partaker of flerti and blood,that he might gather to him yongc „ ,
children to the feruiceof God.In which words it is plamely deternu« ^^'
ncdjthat Chrift is made fellow & partaker of all one nature with vs.
In which meaninge alfo he fayth , that both the author of holincfTc
& they that arc made holy,arc all of one. For it itproucd by the pro-
ceflc of the textjthat the fame is referred to the fellowlhip of hature:
bccaufe he byandby addeth,Therfore he is not afhamed to call them
brethren. For if he had faid bcfore,that the faithfull are of God in fo '^
great d«gnity,what caufe fliould there be to be alhamed?But becaufe
Chrift of his infinite grace dothioync himfclfe to the bafc & vnnobls
therefore it ii faydjthat he is noc aihamed. But in vaine they obfed,
ll>atby this mean e the wicked fliail become the brethren of Chrift:
becaufe we know that the children of God are not borne of flelh arid
biood,buc of the holy Ghoft by faith. There fore onely flefh maketh
not a brotherly loyninge. But although the Apoftle giue this honor
to y faithfull only,to be of one with Chrift, yet it foUoweth not, but
that che wicked may be borne of the fame onginall. As w'hen we fay
that Chrift was made nun, to make vs the fonnes of Godrthis faying
extendeih not to all men, becaufe faith is tlic meane which fpiriruaU
ly gr.iftcth vs into the body of Chrift . Alfo they foohfhly moue a
brawlc about the name of Firft bcgotte.They fay that Chrift fliould Rom, g.
haue bin borne of Adam ftreight at the beginning , that he might be ig.
the firft begotten amonge brethren. For the title of Firft begotten, is
not referred to age,but to the degree of honor,and excellence of po-
wer. And more colour hath that which they bable, that Chrift tooke „^ ^
to him man and not Angels, becaufe he receiued mankinde into h-
uour.Fotjto fct out more largely the honor which God vouchfaued
to giue vSjhe copared the Angeis with vs,which were in this bchalfc
fet behinde v$. And if y teftimony of Motes be well weycd,where he
fayth that the fcede of the womj^ftiallbreakcthe ferpentcs headc, Gc.3.15
it ftiall viterly ende the controue'iiiicFor only Chrift is nor there fpo-
ken of, but all mankinde . Becaufe the vidory was to begotten by
Chrift for vs,he generally pronounccth that the poftcrity of the wo-
man ftiould get the vpper hand of y Deuil.Wherupon followeth,that
Chtift i&ied of mankinde,becaufe ic was Gods purpole there to raife
Cap.i 3 . Of the knowledge of
vp Hue , whom he fpakc vnto with good hope , chat {he fhouUe not
faint with forow.
I They do no Icflc wickedly than foolifhly entangle with allego-
ries thefc tcftimonies where Chrift is called the Cccdcof Abraham,
and the frutc of the wombc of Dauid . For if the name of Scedc
had bin fpokcn in an allegory ,truely Paul would not haueleft it vn-
tolde,whcre he plainly & without figure afHrmeth^that there are not
&4 m5 ^^^y Tonnes of Abraham redemers,but one Chrift.Of like forte is it
chat they alleage : that he is no otherwife called the fonne of Dauid,
but becaufe he was promifed and at length in his due time deliuered.
For after that Paule had once named him the fonne of God : in that
lto.i.|. he byandby addeth, According to the ftefh,he truely meaneth of na«
ture. And fo m the 9 chapter callinge him the bleffed God, he fayth
feuerally befidej thataccordinge to the flefli he defcendcd of the le-
wes. Nowc if he were not truely begotten of the feede of Dauid, to
what purpofe llialbc this fayinge, that he is the frute of his wombe }
Pfjui u What meantth this promiie?Out of thy loynes (hal he defcende,th3C
ti. ili.^il abide in thy feate. Now in the Genealogie of Chrift, as it is rc*^
hearfed of Mntthew,they do Sophiftically mocke. For though he do
not rehcarfe the paretes of Mane but of lofeph^yet becaufe he fpea-
keth of a thing fufficiently knowcabrode among the people,hereck-
ncthitenough to flicw that lofeph came of the feede of Dauid, when
it was well knowfn that Mary was of the fame ftocke. But Luke more
prcffeth them in teaching thai faluation brought by Chrift,is comon
to all mankindc:becaufc Chrift the author of faluation proceeded fro
Adam the common parent of all.I graunt in ded?,ihat by the Gene-
alogie it can none otherwife be gathered that Chrift was the fonne
of Dauid, but in fo much as he was begotten of the Virgirre. But the
newcMarcionites to colour their errour do to proudly, inthisthat
to prouc that Ciirift tookehis body ofnothing,they affirme that wo-;
men are feedcles,and fo they ouerthrow the principles of nature. But
becaufe that is no queftion of diuinity,& the rcafons that they bnngc
are fo fickle , that they may very eafily be confuted : therefore I will
not touich thofe thingcs that belong to Philofophie and Phifike,and
will hold pie contented to wipe away thofe thinges that they alleage
out of Scripture : that is>that Aaron and loiadah tooke wiues of the
tribe of Iehudah,& Co the difference of tribes had then bin confoun-
ded , if woman hadde cngendringe (cede in her. But it is well enough
knowen y as touching ciuile order , the kindreds are reckened by the
fede of the man,& yet the excellency of the kinde of man abouc wo-
man proucfh not the contrary,buc that in generatio the (ecde of wo«
man
GodtheRedemer. Lib.2. 190
m.m muft meetc.And this foiucion cxtcndeih to nil the Genealogies.
Oftentimes when the Scnptui e rcckcneth vj> a Genealogie > it na-
tnerh the me onlyrfhal wc thcrfore fay, that the women arc nothing?
But very children do know,th;u women are comprehended vnder chc
oanaeofmen. And after this forteitisfaid, rhat women bring forth
ro their husbandcSjbecaufc the name of the houfehold alway remai-
neth with the males. Now as t!iis is graunted to tlie excellency of the
male kinde i that the children are compted noble or vnnoble , accor-
ding to the eftaie of their fathers.'fp alfo in the ftace of bondage the
ifl'uc followeth the vvombe,according to the Judgement of the Ciuile
Uwy ers. Whereby wc may gather, that the ifToe is engendred of the
feedc of thcwoman . And k hath of longtime bin rece4ucd in com-
mon vfe of al nationSjthat the mothers are called Genetrices,that is
CPAcdrers.Wherwith Godslaw ilfoagrecrhjwhic'n clfc (hould wr5g-
fuliy foibid y mariage of the vncle with his fifters daughter, bccaufe
there were no confanguinity betwcnethcm : and nlfo it were lawful!
for a tnan to marry his (ilter by the mothers fide, fo thut Hie were be-
gotten of an other father But as I graun: that there is a padsuc power
afcribei to women, fo do I anfwerc tiiat the fame thint» is indifferent-*
ly fpoken of them tl)at is of men . And Choft liimfclfe is not (ayd to Ga.4.4,
be made by the woman, but of the woman. But fomc oftheir com-
pany ihaktng ofalUliame do too leudly askCjWhcther wc wil fay that
Chrift was engendred of the menftiuall Csedc of the V«rg«ne , for I
will likewifc aske of them,>whethcr he did not congelc in the bloud'
of his mother, which they fhalbc conftrainedto confcfle.Therforc it
is fitly gathered of Matthcwes words,that becaufe Chrift was begot-
ten oFMaric, he was engendred or her feedcas a like cngendringc is
meant when it is fayd, y Booz was. begotten of Rahab.Neither <Joih ^^'**
Matthew hcrcdefcfibc the Vnyineas a conduit pipe through which
Chrift paflcd ; buthe feuereihthis maruellousmancr of generation
from the common mancr,for that by her Chrift was begotten of the
Cecde of Dauid. For euen in the fame forte, that f faac was begotten
of Abraham, Salomon of Dauid, and f ofeph of lacob, likcwife ir i$
fayd that Chrift was begotten of his mother . For the Euangelift fo
frameth the order of his fpeach , and wiUinge to prouc that Chrift
came of Dauid,is contented with ihis one reafonjthat he was besot-
ten of Marie.Whcrby it followeth, that he tookc it for a matter co •
feflcdjthat Marie was of kinne to lofcph.
4 The abfurdities wherewith they wouldc charge vs , are ftufFed
full of childifh cauillations . They thinke it a ftiame and dift^onor to
Chnftjif he iliouid hauc cake his original of men:becaufe fo he could
Cap.13. Of the knowledge of
not be exempt frofli the Vniuerfall law chat enclofeth all the of/pring
of Adam Without CKception,vnder ^nne.But the comparifon that we
rea4in Paule doth eaiily affoyle this dout ; that as by one man came
(inne^and by finnc death, fo by the lighceoufnefle of one man grace
hath a bounded. Wherewith alfo agrccth an other comparifon of his:
the firft Adam of earth, earthly and naturall, the fcconde of heauen,
hcauenly.Therfore in ao other placc,the fame Apoftle.whcrehe tca-
cheth that Chrift was fent in the likcnes of finfull flefh to fatisfic the
law, doth fo cxpreflely fcuere him from the common cftatc of men,
that he be very man without fault and corruption.But very childiflily
ihey trifle in rcafomng thus : If Chrift be free from all fpot, and was
by theiecrctc workinge of the holy Ghoft begotten of the feedc of
Marie , then is not the womans feedc , but oncly the mani feede vn^
clcane.For we do not make Chrift free fro all fpot, for this caufc y he
is only engendred of his mother without copalation of man, but bc-
caufc he is fandified by the holy Ghoft , that the generation might
be pure and vncorrupted,fuch as fKould haue bin before the fal of A-
dam. And this alway remained ftedfaftly determined with vs^ that fo
oft as the fcripture putteth vs in minde of the cleannefTe of Chrift, it
is meant of his true nature of manhoode.becaufc it Wtrc fupeiftuous
to fay that God is cleane. Alfo the fandification that he fpeaketh of
in the feuenteene of lohn, could haue no place in the nature of God.
Neither are there fained two feedes of Adam,althougIi therecame no
infedion to Chrift: becaufe the generation of ma is not vndeane or
vicious ofitfelf€,butacddentall by his falling. Therfore it is no mar-
ucll , if Chrift , by whom the cftate of innocency was to be reftored,
were exempt from common corruption. And whcras alfo they thrufl:
this vpon vs for an abfurdity , y if the Word of God did put on fleft>^
then was it endofed in a narrow prifon of an earrtily bodyrthis is but
mere waywardnes:becaufe although the infinite cflece of the Word
did growe together into one perfon with the nature of man : yet do
we faine no cnclofingc of it. For the Sonne of God defcended mar-
ucloufly from heaueh , fo as yet he left not hcauen, it was his will ta
be marueloufly borne in the Virgins wombe , to be conuerfai»t in
carth,& hang vpon the croflc,yet that he alway tilled the world eucn
as at the beginning.
The xiiii. Chapter.
How the tyvo natures of the %Mediateur do makf
tne^trfon*
Now
GodtheRcdemen Lib.2. - 191
NOw where it i$ fayd , that the Word was madeflefK : that >$ , »
notfoto be vndcrftanded , as though it were either turned j]?
into fle£h , orconfufely mingclcd with flcHi , but becaufc he
chofehim a temple of the Virgins wombc to dwell in.hc
that was the Sonne of God , became alfo the fonne of man , not by
confu(]on of fubftance,but by rnity of perfon. For wc fo affirme the
godheade ioyned and vnited to the manhoode , that either of them
haue their whole|^ropcrty remainjng,and yet of them both is made
one Chrift. If anjr thing in all worldly ihiogcs may be founde like to
fo great a myfterie , the fimilitude of man is moft firtCj whom wc fee
to confift of two fubftanccs , whereof yet neither is fo mingeled with
ocher,butthat either keepeth the property of his ownc nature . For
neither is the foulc the body.nor the body the fouIe.Whcjrforc both
that thing may be ftucrally fpoken of the foule,whtch can no way a-
grec with the body:and hkewifc of the body tl^at thing may be fayd,
which can by no meanc agree with the foule : and that may be faid
of the whole man,which can be but vnfitly taken neither of the foule
nor of the body fcuerally . Finally , the properties of the foule arc
fomtimc attributed to the body,and the properties of the body Com-
time to the foule i and yet he that conliikth of them is but one man
and not many. But fuch formes of fpeach do /ignifie both that there
ii one perfon ia man compounded of two natures knit together, and
that there are two diucrfe natures which do make the fame perfon.
And fo do the Scriptures fpeake of Chrift : Sometime they giue ve-
to him thoCc thinges that ought fingularly to be referred to his man-
hoode,& fomtime thofe things that do peculiarly belong to his god-
head, & fomtime thofe things that do comprehend both natures, 8c
do agree with neither of them feuerally. And this conioyning of the
two natures j are in Chrift,they do with fuch religioufnes cxpre(re»
that fometime they do put them in common tog ether: which 6gurc
is among the old authors called, Communicating of properties.
z Thcfc things were but weake,vnlcs many phrafes of Scripture,
and fuch as be cchwhere rdady to finde,did proue that nothing here-
of hath bin deuifed by man. That fame thinge which Chrift fpakc of
himfelfe,faying-.Before that Abraham was,! amrwas farre difagrecing loh.g,
from his manhoode . Neither am J ignorant with what cauillation $*•
the erroneous fpirites do depraue this place : for they fay that he was
before all ages, becaufe he was already foreknowen the Redemer, as
well in the counfell of the father, as in the miades of the godly . But
where as he openly diftinguifheth the day of his manifeftation from
his etcrnall eflfencc , & of purpofe pronounceth vnco himfelfe an au-
Cap. 1 4. Of thclcnowledgcof
thority by antiquity wherein hcexcellctli aboue Abraham,- he dorfi
vndoutedly chalen^c to himlelfc that which is proper ta the God-
Colo. 1 hcad.Whereas Paul affirmcth tliat he is the hrft bcgowen of all crea-
*^J^ tures,which was before all things, & by whom all things kccpc their
J " * ' being: & whcras he himfclfe reporreth that he was in glory with the
loh.j. father before the* creatioof the world, & y he worketh together with
«7' the tathcrthcfe things do nothing more agree with y nature of men.
It is therforc certaine, that thefe and !uch like ar^>eculiarly afcnbed
F.ra.4i.i to the godhead. But whereas he is called the feruantof the fathefrand
111. 1 . 5 X wheras it is iaid.that he grew in aefrwifdom & fauour with God and
men: that he feketh not his owne glory:thathe knmvcthnot the laft
Matct J <i3y:ihat he fpcakcth not of himfclfe:! hat he doth not his owne wjU:
loi). 14. where it is fayd , that he was fcene and felt this wholly belongeth to
to & 6. his only manhode. For in the rcf^e<ft that he is God, neithc/can he
J** cacreafe in-any thingc,3nd he worketh all thinges for his owne fake,
-o ' neither is any thing hidden from liim, he doth .ill things according to
the free choife of his owne will,and can neither pc feenc nor fck. An<J
yet he doth not feucrally afcribe thefe things to his nature of ma on-
ly* but takcch the vpon himfclfe, as if they did agree with the perfon
of the mediatotir . But the communicatinge of properties is in this
Aft. ao that Paul faith, that God did by his owne bloud purchafc vnto him a
i.Cor 1 ^^"""^^ •' ^"^ '^^^ Lord of glory crucified Ag3ine,where John fayth,
jj*, ' that the Word of life was felt. Truely God neither hath bjoud, nor
i.Ioh.i. fuffcreth , nor can be touched with handcsBut becaufe he which was
*• both very God & man, Chrifl being crucified, did fhed his bloud for
vsrthofc thinges that were done in his'nature of man, are vnproperly,
and yet not without reafon giuen to his godhead. A like example is,
i.Toh.5. where John tcacheth that God gaue ins loule for vs: therefore there
J^- alfo the property of the manhode is coinunicate wrth the other na-
^ ■*■ ture.Aj^aine,whcn Chriflfayd being yet conuerfant in earth, that no
man hath afcendcd into heaue,but the fonne of man that was in hea-
Dcnrtruely according to his manhoode , and in the ftcfli that he had
put on,he w.-^s not the in heauen : but bccalife himfelfe was both God
and man , by reafon of the vnity of both natures, he gaoc to the one
that, which belonged to the oiher. '•
5 But moft plainly of all do thefe places fct forth the true fubflacc
of Chilli, which do comprehend both natures togetherrof which fort
there are vcrv many in the gofptU of him.For that which is there red
is fingularly belonging neither to his godhead nor to his manhoode,
. . but bod^ toc^cther : y he hath receiucd of his father power to forgiuc
p,ii], linnes^ttt raife vp whom he will, to giue righceouftieiTe, hohneffe and
lu . ialuatioB
GodthcRedemer. Lib.2. 192
faluation, to be made iudge oucr the quickc & the dea<i to be hono-
red euen as the father is : Finally , that he is called the light of the Io?».5>«f
worid,the good ftiepherd,the only dore,ihe true Vine.For fuch prc-
roj^atiues had y fonnc 6f God,whe he was fliewed in the tiefh:wnich
although he enioyed with his father before the worlde was made,yet
he had the not in the fame maner or the faniejefpedj& which could j ,
no: be giuc to fuch a man as was nothing but man. In the fame mea- ,^
ninge ought we to take that which is in Paule : that Chrift after the i.Cor.
iudgcment ended,fhall ycelde vp the kingdom to God & the father; *4»
Euen the kingdom of the fonne of God,which had no begining,nor
fliall haue any cndingc:but euen as he lay hid vnder the b^fenefl'c of
the flefh , and abaccd himfclfe, takingc vpon him the forme of a fcr-
uaunt,and laykigc afidc the porte of maiefty,he fhewed himfelle o- P^^'***'
bediet to his father.*& hauing performed all fuch fubiedion, at legth
is crowned with honor & glory , & auaunced to the higheft domini-
on,that all knees fliall bow before him:fo fhall he then yeelde vp to Hf.t.<,
his father both that name & crowne of glory, & whatfocuer he haih Phil i.
receiued of his fathg^that God may be all in all.For to what purpofe ''"•
is power & dorainroh giuen him, but that the father fliould goucrne * J
vs by his handcfln which fenfe it isalfoiiydjthat hefiiteth at y right
hand of the father.But this is but for a iime,til we may enioy the prc-
fent beholding of the godhead. An<l here the crrour of y old fathers
can not be excufed, which while they topke no hccde to the perfon
of the Mediatoutjhaue obfcured y natural meaning of almoft all the
doctrine that is read in the gofpell of lohn,& haue entangled them-
fclues iin many fnares. Let this therefore be vnto vs the key of right
vnderftandingjthat fuch things as belong to the office of the Media-
tour,are not fpoke limply of the nature of God, nor of the nature of
fnan.Therfore,Chrift fhal reigne til he come forth to iudge y world,
infomuch as he ioyneth vs to his father,according to the (male niea-
fure of our weakenefle . But when we beinge made partakers of the
heauenly glory ,fhall fee God fuch as he is,thc he hauing performed
the office ofMediatour,fhali cealTc to be the embafladour of his fa-
ther,& (halbe cotcnted with that glory which he enioyed before the
makinge of the worlde. And the name of Lord doth in no other rc-
fpc(^ peculiarly agree with the perfon of Chri(l,buc in thi$,that it fi-
gnificth y meane degree betwene God & vs. For which purpofe ma-
kcthy faying of PauhOne God,of whom a'-e all things,& one Lord,»C<>f,i
by whom are all things, euen he to whom the dominio for a timeis ^'
comiited by the father,vntil his diuinc maiefty be to be fecne hccz'y
face.Fr6 whom Co far is it of that any thing fhall decay, by y e Waigvp
Cap. 14. Ofthe knowledge of
the dominion to hrs father , that he Ihall become (b much the more
glorious.For then fliall God alfo ceflc to be y head of Chrift bccauTc
Chriftes godheade (hall then fhinc of it felfe, whereas yet it is coue-
red with a certaine veile.
4 And this obferuarion (hall do no fmall ftrukcto alToilcmany
doutes,if ihe readers do fidy apply it. For it is maruelous how nmich
the vnskilfull,yea fome not vtteily vnlearned, are combrcd with fuch
formes of fpeach, which they fee fpoken by Chriiljwhich do well a-
grce neither with his godheade nor with his manhoode;becaufc they
conh'dcr not tTiat they do agree with his perfon tvherin he is ITicwcd
both God and man, and with the office of Mediatour . And it is al-
way eafic to fee,hovv well all things hang together, if they hauc a (6'
ber expofiiour,to examine fo great miikricS with fuch deuout reuc-
re nee as they ought to be.But there is rvothing that thefe furious and
Aug. in phrcncike fpirites trouble not . They catch hoW of thofe things that
a" Laii- ^^*^ fpokcn of his manhoode,to take away his Godhead: and like wife
rcnt.ca. of thofe things that are fpoken of his godhead to take away his man-
5<S. hoodc:and of thofcthingcs that are fo ioyniiy fpoken of both natu-
rcSjthatthey feuerally agree with neither,to take away both. But what
is that clfe but to fay , that Chrift is not man , becaufe he is God.and
that he is not God,becaufe he is man : and that he is neither man nor
Godjbecaufe he is both man and God ? We therefore do determine
that Chnft, as he is both God and man , confifting of both natures,
vnited , though not confounded , is our Lord and the true fonne of
God,euen according to this manhoode , though not by reafon of his
manhoode.For the errour of Neftorius is to bedriuen far away from
vs, which when he went about rather to draw in funder , than to di-
ftmguilli the nature^did by y mcahe imagine a double Chrift. Whcr-
as we fee that the Scripture crieth out with loude voice againft it,
where both the name of the fonne of God is giuen to him that was
Lu.Lsj borne ofthe Virgine , &the Virgme her felfe is called the nrjother of
Si 44' our Lorde. We muft alfo beware of the madnefle of Eutiches, Icaft.
while we go about to fliew the vnity ofthe perfon, we deftroy either
nature. For we haue already alleaged fo many teftimonies,^ there arc
eucry where fo many otherto be alleaged, wlicre his Godhead is di-
ftinguifticd from his manhoodc,as may flop the mouthes euen gf the
moft contentious, And a litle berafter I will adioitic fome teftimonies,
to confute better that faincd deuife,but at this prefent,one place ftial
loh. J. cotent vs.Chrift would not haue called his body a Temple,vnleflc the
*i>- Godhead diddiftindly dwel iherin.Whcrfore as Neftorius was wor-
thily condemned in the lynode at Bphefus^fo alfo was Eutiches after-
ward
God the Redemcn Lb.2 i^j
ward condemned in the [y nodes of Conftantinoplc and Chalccdon:
forafrftuch as it is no more lawfull to confoundc the two natures in
Chriftjthan it is to draw them in fundcr.
• 5 Butinour agealfotherehathrifenvpnolespeftilentamofter,
Machaell Seruettus which did thruftinplaccof thefonne of God,
a fained thing made of the effence of God, of rpint,ftefli & three cle-
incntes vncreate. And firft he dcnicth that Chrift is by any other way
the fonne of God,but in this that he was begotten of y holy ghoft in
the wombe of the Virgine. But to this ende tendeth his futtlcty,that
the diftindio of y two natures being once ouerthro\ve>Chrift might
J>e thought to be a certainc thing mingled of God & m2n,& yet nei-
ther God norman.Forinhis whole procelfehc trauailcth toward this
pointjthat before Chrift was opcly ihewed in the fleih,therc were on-
ly certaine {hadowifli figures in God,wherof the trueth or effed then
at length was in beingc, when that word which was ordained to that
honor,began truely to be the fonne of God. And we in dede do con-
fefle that the Mcdiatour which is borne of the Virgin,is properly the
Ibnne of God. For Chrift in that he is man,could not be the mnor of
the incftimable fauour of GodjVnlelTe this dignity were giuen him to
be,andbc called the onely begotten fonne of God. But in the meanc
fcafon the definitio of the Church ftandeth ftedfaftly grounded, that
he is compted the fonne of God,becaufe he being the Wotd begot-
ten of the father before all wtMlds,did by hypoftatical vnion take vpo
him the nature of man. Now the hypoftaticall vniois called with the
olde fathers, that which maketh one pcrfon of two natures , which
phrafe of fpeach was deuifed to ouerthrow the doting crrour of N e-
ftorius, becaufe he fained that the fonne of God did fo dwell in flefti,
that yet he the fame was not man. Seruettus fclaundereth vs, that we
make two fonnes of God when we fay that the cternall Word was ai-
ready.the fonne of God before that it was clothed with fle{h,as if wc
did fay any thing elfc but that he was manifeftcd in the ftelh. Neither
doth it follow, that if he were God before that he was man,he began
to* be a new God. And no more abfurdity it is to fay,that the fonne of
God appeared in the flclh,wljich j^et had this alway from etcrnall be-
getting to be the Sonne,which the Angels words to Mary do fecreily
(hew, That holy thing y ftiall be borne of thee,fhaU be called y fonne
of God:as if he (hould haue fayd , that the name of the Sonne which
was obfcure in time of the law,{hould now become famous and eue-
ry where kno>Nuen abroade. Wherewith agrecth that faying of Paul, Ro.g.ij;
that now by Chrift wcare the children of God, freely & with bold-
tieiTe to eric Abba, Father. Bui were not the holy fathers in the oldc
BB
Cap. 14* Of the Icnowledgeof
time alfb accomptcd amonge the children of God? Yea:andbeafmg
them bold vpon chat intcreft,thcy called vpon God by name of their
Facher.But bccaufc finceyonly begotten fonne of God was brought
forth into tlie world,the heauenly fatherhodc is become more plain-
ly knowen:therefore Paul affigneth this,as it wereja priuilcgc to the
kingdom o;f Ghrift.Butyet this is ftadfafily to be holdcjthat God nc*
uer was father either to Angels or men^but in rcfped df the only be-
gotten fonne : and that men fpeciaIly,whom their ownc wickedncfle
maketh hateful to God,are his children by free adoption becaufe he
is the fonne of God by nature. And there is no caufe why Seruettus
fhould cauilljthat this hangcth vpon fiiiatio or becommmg a fonne,
which God had determined with himfelf:becaufe our purpofe is not
heare to fpeake of the figures hov/e the expiation was {hewed in the
bloud of bcaftesrbuc becaufe they could not in dede be the childrcof
Godjvnlefle their adopticn^^ were grounded vpon y head,it is without
realbn to take that from the head which is common to all the mem-
bers. I go yet furdier : Whereas the Scripture calleth the Angels the
Pfa.S*. fonnes of God,whofe fo great dignity did not bang vpon the redep-
7» tion to come:yet muft it needes be, thatthe fonne is in order before
thcm^ which maketh the father to be their father.! will repeate it a-
game il-iortly,& adde the fame of mankinde.Siih from at their firft be-
ginning both Angels and men were created, with this condition.that
God fhould be common father to them both, it that faying of Paulc
be trucjthat Chrift was alway the head & the firft bcgotte of aU crea-
Colo.i, tuics , to haue the firft degree in all:l thinke I do rightly gather that
»5' he was alfo the fonne ofGod before the creation ot the worlds
6 But if his Filiation (iH may fo tcrme it)began Gncc he was ma*
nifeftod in the flefli,it fhall follow, that he was alfofonne in refpcft of
his nature of man.Seructtus and other fuch frentike men would haue
itjthat Chrift which appeared in y flefh,i$ the fonne of God^becaufe
out ofthe flefh he coulde not be called by that name. Now let them
anfwsre me whether he be the fonne according to both natures,a|i(l
in refped of both.So in ^ecde they prate,but Paule teacheth farre o-
thcrwife.We graunt in decde,thatfi!hrift is in the flefli ofman called
th e Sonne , bat not as the faithfuU arc , that is by adoption only and
grace,but the true and naturall,and therefore only fonne,that by this
marke he may be difcerncd from all other . For God voutfaueth to
giue the name of his fonnes ro vs,thatarc regenerate into a new life:
but the name of the true and only begotten fonnc,he gioeth to Chrift
. only .How can he be the only fonne in fo great a number of brethre,
bui becaufe he poflclfeth that by naturc,which wc haue rcceiued by
gift?
GodthcRedemer. Lib.2. 1^4
gift? And y honor vvc extendc to the whole pcrfcn of rhc Mcdiatour,
that he be truely & properly the Sonne of God, which wi!$ alfo borne
of the Virgme, & offered himfclfe for facrificc to his fother vpon the
crolfcbut yet in refped: of his Godhcadc , as Paule tcacheth, when Ro. ••
he fayth,hc was feucrcd out to preach the Gofpell of Godjwhich he
had before promifed of his fonne , which was begotten of the feeds
of Dauid according to his fltilijand declared the fonne of God in po-
wer , But why, whc he naineth him diftindly the fonne of Dauid ac-
cording to the fleflijfhould he feuernlly fay,th3t he was declared the
Sonne of GodjVnkiTc he meant to (hew that this did hang vpo fomc
other thingCjthan vpon the very flc(h ? For in the fame fenfe m an o-
thcr place he fayth , that he futfei ed by the weakcncfie of the ftcf]}, a. Cor
and rofc againc by thepowerofthefpirice, euen fo in this place he 'i'4^'
maketh a difference of both natures. Truly they muft ncedts graunt,
that as he hath that of his mother for which he is calic-d the Sonne
of Dauid , fb he hath that of hi^ F.uher for which he is cnllcd the
Sonne of God : and the fame is an other thing and fcuerall from the
nature of man . The Scripture giucth him two names , callinge him
here & there fometimes the Sonne of God, and fomtimes the Sonne
of Man. Of the fecond there can be nocoteniion moucd.bist accor-
ding to the common vfe of the Hebrue tongue he is called the Sonne
ofma,becaufeheis of the offpring of Ada. By the contrary I affirrne,
that he is called the Sonne of God in refpcft of the Godhead & etcr-
jiall efTence : becaufe it is no If fle meetc that it be referred to the na-
ture of Godjthat he is called the Sonne of God,than to the nature ot
iiian,that he is called the Sonne of Man. Againc,in y fame place thac
I alleagcdjPaul doth mcanethat he which wa* according to the flcHi
begotten of the feede of Dauid,was no otherwifc declared the Sonne Ro ,9.1
of God in power,tha he teacheth in an other place,that Chrift which
accordinge to the flefh dcfcended of the lewes, is God bleffcd for e-
uer. Now if in both places the diftindio of the double nature be tou-
ched,by what right wil they fayjthat he which according to y flefli is
the Sonne of Man , is not alfo the Sonne of God , in refped of the
nature of God.
7 They do in dede diforderly enforce for the maintcnacc of their
errour, the place where it is fayd,y God fpared not his owne Sonne: Rom.8
& where the Angcll commaunded, that the very fame he that rtiould ? 2.
be borne of y Virginc,(hould be called the Sonne ofthe higheft.But, Lu.x.j
leaft they fhould glory in fo fickle an obiedion, let them wcy with v$
a htle, how ftiongly they reafon. For if it be rightly concluded , that
from his conceptioahc bcganne to be die Sonne of God,becaufchc
BB ij.
Cap. 14. Of theknowlcdgc of
that IS conceiued is called the Sonne of Godjthen fliall it folIo\v,that
oh.i . ^^ began to be the word at his manifefting in the flcfli,becaure lohn
faythjihac he bringeth them tidmges of the Word of hfc , which his
handes haue handeled. Likewife thafjwhich is readc in the Prophet:
Ig . J Thou Bctbleem in the lande of luda , art a Utie one in thoufandes of
luda : Out of thee (hall be borne to me a guide to rule my people If-
rael , and his comming forth from the beginning , from the daies of
ctcrnity.How will they be compelled to expounde this,if they will be
content to follow fuch manner of reafoning? For I haue protcfted,
that we do notagre with Neftorius,which imagined a double Chrift:
whereas by our dodrine , Chnfthath madevs the Tonnes of God
with him , by right of brotherly conioyninge , becaufe he is the on-
ly begotten fonne of God in the flcfh which he tooke of vs. And Au-
guftine doth wifely admonifli vs, that this is a bright glaflc ) wherein
to behold the maruellous and lingular fauour of God , that he attai-
ned honor in refped that he is man which he couldc not deferue.
Therforc Chrift was adorned with this excellency cuen according to
the flefli fro the wombe of his mother,to be the Sonne of God. Yet
is there not in the vniiy of perfon to be fained fuch a mixture,as may
take away that which is proper to the Godhcadc. For it is no more
abfurdity , that the eternall word of God and Chrift , by reafon of
the two natures vnitcd into one perfon , be diuerfe wayes called the
Sonne of God , than that he be accordingc to diuerfe refpedes, cal-
led fomctime the Sonne of God , and fometime the fonne of Man,
And no more doth that other cauillation of Seructtus accomber vs;
that before that Chrift appeared in the flcfh, he is no where called
the Sonne of God , but vnder a figure, becaufe although the defcri-
bing of him,the was fomewbat darkc;yet where as it is already clere-
ly proued that he was no otherwife eternall God,but becaufe he was
the word begotten of the eternall father,and that this name doth no
otherwife belonge to the perfon of the Mediatour which he hath ta-
ken vpon him, but becaufe he is God openly fhewed in the fleih: and
that God the Father hath not bin called Father from the beginning,
if there had not then bin a mutuall relation to the Sonnejby whomc
all kinred or fatherhood is reckened in heaucn and in earth;hereby it
is eafie to gather, that euen in the time of the law and the Prophets,
he was the Sonne of God,before that this name was commoly kno-
wen in the Church . But if they ftriue onely about the onely word,
Salomon difcourfing of the infinite highnefle of God , affirmeth as
well his Sonne as himfelfe to be incomprehcnfible. Tell his name if
O.JO, thou canft (Tayth he) or the name of his fonne.Yetlam not igno-
rant
GodthcRcdcmer. Lib.2. ip5
rant,that with the contentious this tcftimony will not be of fufficienc
force:neither dol much grounde vpon itjCauing that it Hieweth thac
they do malicioufly cauill, that deny Chrift to be the Sonne of God,
but in this refped that he was made man . Belide that , all the oldell
wryters with one mouth and confent haue openly tcftified the fame:
fochat theirfliamelefncfreisnolefle worthy to be fcorned than to
be abhorrcdjwhfch dare obieft Ireneus & Teriullia againft vs,both
which do confefle that the Sonne of God was inuifiblc, which after -
ward appeared vifible.
8 But although Seruettus hath heaped vp horrible monftruous
deuifes , which paraduenture the other woulde not allow : yet if ye
f>reire them hard,ye {hall perceiue that all they that do not acknow-
edge Chrift to be the Tonne of God but in the flefli,do graunt it on-
ly in this refpe6i,that he was concciued in the wombe of the Virgin
by the holy Ghoft,like as the Maniches in olde time did foolilhly af-
firme , that man hath his foule (as it were) by deriuation from God,
becaufcihey reade that God breathed into Adam the breath of life.
For they take Co faft hold of y name of Sonnc,that they leaue no dif-
ferece betwenc the natures, but babble diforderly,that Chrift being
man,is the Sonne of God, becaufe according to his nature of man,
he is begotten of God.So the cternall begetting of Wifdom,that Sa-
lomon fpcaketh ofjis dcftroied,and there is no accompt made of the
Godheade in the Mediatour , or a fantafied Ghoft is thruft in place
of the Manhoode.lt were in deede profitable to confute the groffcr Ecel.j
deceites of Seruettus , wherewith he hath bewitched himfelfe and ' 4»
fome other,to the ende that the Godly readers admonifhed by this
example,may hold themfelues within the compaflfe of fobernes and
modeftyrfauing that I thinkeit fliouldbe fuperfluouSjbecaufc I haue
already done it in a bookc by it felfe.The fumme of them commeth
to this effed,that the Sonne of God,was a forme in minde from the
beginning, and euen then he was before appointed to be man that
(hould be the eflentiall image of God. And he doth acknowledge no
other Word of Godjbut in outward ftiew.This he cxpoundcth to be
the begetting of him, that there was begotten in God from the be-
ginning a will to begette a Sonne , which alfo in aft extended to the
nature it felfe . Inihemeane timeheconfoundeththeSpiritcwith
the Word, for that God diftributed the inuifible Word and the Spi-
rite into flefti and foule. Finally the figuration of Chrift , hath with
them the place of begetting,but he faith, that he which then was but
a (hadowifh fonnc in forme, was at length begotten by the word» to
which he ailigncth the office of fecdc . Whereby it fhall follow that
BB iij.
Cap.i 5. Of the knowledge of
hog' s and dogs arc as well the children of God , becaufc they were
create of the originall fcede of the word of God . For although he
compound ChrKl of three vncreatc elements to make him begotten
of the cfTence of God,yet he faineth that he is fo the firft begotten a-
mong creaturesjthat the fame efl'cntiali godheade is in ftoneSjaccor-
dmg to their degree. And leail he fliould feeme to ftrippe Chrift out
of his godheadjhe affirmeth that his ftcfli is confubftantial with God,
and that the Word was made man by turninge the flefh into God.So
while he can not conceiiie Chrift to be the Sonne of GodjVnleffe his
fldli came from the eflence of God, and were turned into godhead,
he bringeth the eternal! perfon of the Word to nothingc, and taketh
from vs the fonnc of Dauid,that was promifed to be the Redeemer.
He oft repeatcth this, that the Sonne was begotten of God by know-
ledge and predtfttnation , and that at length he was made man of
that matter which at thv; beginning (hined with God in the three e-
Icmentes, which afterward appeared in the firft light of the worlde,
in the cloude and in the piikr of fire.How how lliamefuUy he fomc-
time difagreeth with himfelfe^it were too tedious tp rehearfe.By this
fliorte recital! the readers that haue their founde witte may gather,
that with the circumftances of this vndeane dogge the hope of fal-
uation is vttctly extinguifhed. For if the flefh were the godheade it
fclfe , it llioulde ceafle to be the temple thereof. And none can be
our redemer, bu: he that begotten of the feedc of Abraham and Da-
uid,is accordinge to the flefh, truely made man. And he wrongefully
ftjnderh vpon the wordes of lohn,that the Word was made flefh. for
as they reliftthe errourof Neftorius, fo they nothing further this
wicked inuention,whero{ Eutiches was author, forafmuch as the on-
ly purpofe of the Euangelift was to defend the vnity of pcrfons in the
two natures.
The XV. Chapter.
T'Jdf we may kjiovv^to what end Chri(l was ftnt of hit Fatherland what ht
brought vs:threc thtngi areprru:tpa!'yto beco>^flttred m htm^hit Tropht-
ttcallo^ctyhU K^ngdom^andhu Vriejihoodt,
AVguftine faith righrly,that ahhough the Hereiikcs do braggc
of the nameof Chnft , yet they haue not all one foundation
with the godly, huttliatit rtmainethonely proper to the
Ch'irch. For it thef^thinges be diligently considered > that
belong to Chnft.Chtift fiiall be founde among them onelyin name,
and not in very dcede. Soar thu day the Papiftcs, although the
name of the Sonne o{ God redemer of the worlde , founde in ihcir
mouih:
God the Redemer. Lib.2 . ip6
mouthiyetbecaufe being contented with vaine pretenfc of the name,
they fpoile him of his power and dignity : this fayinge of Paule may Colo.*,
bcwellfpokcnofthemjthatthey hauenotthehead.Therefor€,that '^*
faith may finde founde matter of faluation in Chrift , and To reft in
him, this principle is to be ftabhfhed , that the office which is com-
mitted to him by his Father , confiftcth of three partes. For he is gi-
uen both a Prophct,a King,and a Prieft. Albeit,it were but fmall pro-
fitc to know thofc names, without knowledge of the ende and vfc of
them.For they arc alfo named amonge the Papiftes, but coldly and
to no great profite , where it is not knowen what echc of ihefe tides
cotaineth in it. We hauc faid before,how,though God fending Pro-
phets by continual courfe one after an other did neucr Icaue his peo-
ple deftitute of profitable dodrine , and fuch as was fufficient to fal-
uation ; that yet the mindes of the godly hadde alway this psrfuafi-
on,that full light of vnderftandingc was to be hoped for onely at the
comminge of Meflias : yea and the opinion thereof was conie,e-
ucn to the Samaritans, who yet neuer knew the true rehgion, as ap-
pearcth by the fayinge of the woman : When Meflias commeth, he j
fliali teach vs all thinges. And the lewes had not raihly gathered this
ypon prefumptions in their mindes : But as they were taught by zC-
furcd oracles,fo they beleucd.Notable amonge the other is that fay-
ing of Efay: Behold, I haue made him a witnefle to peoples> Ihaue Efa. jj,
giuen him to be a guide and Schoolcmaiffer to peoples : cuen as in 4«
an other place he had called him y Angell or interpreter of the great
counfel. After this mancr the Apoftle commending tlic perfedion of
the doifbine of the gofpell,after that he had fayd,that God in the old Heb.i.i
time fpakc to the Fathers by the Prophetes diuerfly , and vnder ma-
nifolde figures , addeth that laft of all he fpake vnto vs by his belo-
ued Sonne. But becaufe it was the common office of the Prophetes
to kecpc the Church in fufpenfe,and to vphold it vntill thecomming
of the Mediatour, thcrforc we reade that in their fcattering abroade,
the faithfull coplaincd that they were depriucd of that ordinary be-
nefite> faying: We fee not our tokcns:there is not a Prophet amonge Pf.74.^
Ys:thcre is no more any that hath knowledge. But when Chrift was
DOW not farre of, there was a time appoynted to Daniell to feale vp Dani. 9,
the vilion and tlie Prophet , not onely that the Prophecie , which is 24.
there fpoken of > fhoulde be ftablifhed in aflured credit , but alfo that
the faithfull (houlde Icarne with contented minde to want the Pro-
phetes for a timCjbccaufe the fulncflc and clofing vp of all reuelau*
ons was at hand.
% Now it is to be noted,that the title of commendation of Chrift
BB iiij.
Cap.i 5. Of the knowledge of
bclongeth to thcfe three offices.For we know that in the time of the
law, as well the Prophetes as Prieftes and Kings were anointed with
holy oyle . For which caufc the renoumed name of Meffias was ge»
uen to the promifed Mediatour.But though in deede I confeflV(a$ I
haue alfo declared in an other place , ) that he was called MeflTias by
peculiar conlideration and rcfped of his kingdome : yet the annoyn-
tinges in refped of the office of Prophet & of prieft,haue their place,
^nd are not to be negleded of vs. Of the firft of thefe two is exprelfc
Efa.c!.i mention made in Efay,in thefe wordsrThe fpirit of the Lord lehoua
vpon me. Therfore the Lord hath anointed me,that 1 iliould preach
to the meeke,niould bring heahh to the contrite in heart,fhould de*
clare dchuerance to captiues,{houlde pubbfli the yeare of good will.
Sec. We fee that he was anoynted with the Spirit,to be the publilher
and witnefle of the grace of the Father. And that no: after the com-*
mon manner.'for he is feuered from other teachers, that had the like
office. And here againe is to be noted, that he tooke not the anoin-
ting for himfclfe aloneitha*^ he might execute the office of teaching,
but for his whole body,that in his continuall preachinge of the Go-
fpell,the vertuc of the Spirite fhoulde ioine withall.But in the mcanc
time thisremaineth certaine, that by this pcrfedio of do(firine which
he hath brought, an ende is made of all prophecies : Co that they do
diminifh his authority, that beinge not content with the Gofpcll, do
patch any foraine thinge vnto it . For that voice which thundered
f^^jj , from heauen , faying : This is my beloued Sonne,heare him:hath a-»
17. uaunced him by fingular priuilege abouethe degrees of all other.
Then , this oyntment is poured abroade from the head vnto all the
[ocl, I. membersras it was forefpoken by loel; Your children Ihall prophecie,
*^- and your daughters fhali fee vifions.&c. But where Paule fayth, that
' he was giuenvs vnto wifdom : and in an other place, that in him are
Liol.s.j hidden all the trealiircs of knowledge and vndcrftandingcrthis hath
fomcv/hat an other meaninge : thatis,that outofhim thereisno-
thinge profitable to knowe , and that they which by faith perceauc
what he is , haue comprehended the whole infinitenefle of heauenljr
good thinges. For which caufe he wryteth in an other place : I haue
t.Cor. z compted it precious to know nothing,but lefus Chrift,and him cru-
V, <iHed : which is moft true, becaufe it is not lawfull to paflc beyondc
the fimplicity of the Gofpell. And hereunto tcndeth the dignity of
a Prophrtes office in Chrift,that we might know that in the fumme
ofthcdodrine , which he hath taught, arc contained all pointes of
perfed wifdom.
J Now come I to his kingdome, of which were vaync to (peake,
if
God the Rcdcmer. Lib.2, ipy
if the readers were not firft warned , that the nature thereof is fpiri-
tualL For thereby is gathered , both to what purpofe it fcrueth, and
what it auaileth vs,and the whole force and etcrnitie therofjand alio
the eternitie which in Daniel the Angell doth attribute to the per-
fon o{ Chrift;and againe the Angell in Luke doth worthily applie to
the faluation of the people . But that is alfo double or of two fortes,
for the one belongeth to the whole bodie of the Church , the other
is propre to euery membre . To the firft is to be referred that which
is faid in the Pfalme : I haue ones fworne by my holinefle to Dauid, Pfa. 85
I will not lie , his feede fhall abide for euer , his fcate (hall be as the l^-
Sunne in my (ight , it fhall be ftabhfhed as the Moone for euer , and
a faithfull witnefle in heauen . Neither is it doubtfuU , but that God
doth there promifc,that he wil be by the hande of his fonne an cter-
nallgouerner and defender of his Church , For the true perfour-
mance of this prophecie can be founde no where els but in Chrift:
forafmuch as immediatly after the death of Salomon, the greater
parte of the dignitie of the kingdome fell away , and was to the diC-
honour of the houfe of Dauid conueyed ouer to a priuate man , and
afterwarde by litle and litle was diminilhed , till at length it came to
vtter decaic with heauy and (hamefull deftrudion. And the fame
meaning hath that exclamation of Efaie : Who fliall fhewe forth his £fg ,,
generation? For he fo pronounceth ihat Chrift /hall remaine aliuc 8,
after death , that he ioyncth him with his membres . Therefore, fo
oft as we heare that Chnft is armed with eternall power, let vs re-
membre that the euerlafting continuance of the Church is vpholden
by this fupport,to remaine ftdl fafe amog the troublefome toflinges,
wherewith it is continually vexed , and among the greuous and ter-
rible motions that threaten innumerable deftrudions. So when Da- VCal.y.
uid fcorneth ihe boldnefle of his enemies , that go about to breake J«4.
the yoke of God and of Chrift,and faith,that the kinges and peoples
raged in vainc , bycaufe he that dwelleth in heauen is ftrong enough
to breake their violent aflauhes: he aflurcth the Godly of the conn-
nuall preferuatio of the Church,and encourageth them to hope well
(b oft as it happeneth to be oppreffed. So in an other place, when he PfiLiio
faith in the perlbn of God : lit on my right hande , till I make thine
enemies thy foote ftoole : he warneth vs , that how many and ftrong
enemies fo euer do confpirc to befiege theChurch,yet they haue not
firegth enough to preuaile againft that vnchangeable decree of God,
whereby he hath apointed his fonne an eternall kinge: wherevpon
it folio weth, that it is impofl'ible that the Deucll with all the prepa*
ration of the worlde, may be able at any time to deftroy the Cliurch^
Cap.i 5. Of the knowledge of
whicia IS grouded vpon the eternall feate of Chrift.Now for Co much
as conccrneth the fpcciall vfe of euery onc,the very fame eternal co-
tinuance ought to raife vs vp to hope of immortahty.Forwe fce,that
whatfoeuer is earthly and of tlie worldc,endureth but for a time, yea
s>li 1 8. 3nd is very fraile. Therefore Chrift, to lift vp our hope vnto heauen,
;6. pronounceth that his kingdome is not of this worlds. Finally, when
any of vs hearethjthatthe kingdome of Chrift is fpirituall,let him be
raifcd vp with this faying, and let him pearce to the hope of a better
life : and whereas he is nowe defended by the hande of Chrift , lei
him looke for the full frute of this grace in the worlde to come.
4 That,aswehaucraide,theforceandproiiteofthekingedomc
of Chrift can not otherwife be perceiued by vs , but when we knowc
ittobefpirituall, appearethfufficiemly though it were but by this,
that while we muft hue in warfare vnder the croffe, during the whole
courfe of our life,our eftate is harde and miferable:what then ftiould
it profit vs to be gathered together vnder the dominion of a heauen*
ly king,vnlcire we were certaine to enioy the frute thereof out of the
fiatc of this earthly life ? And therefore it is to be knowcn,that what*
foeuer fclicitic is promifed vs in Chrift , it confifteth not in outwarde
commodities, that we (houlde leade a merry and quiet life, florifh in
wealth,bc aflurcd from all harmes , and flowe full of thofe delitefull
thinges that the flefh is wont to defirc , but that it wholy bejongeth
to tlie heauenly Itfe. But as in the woilde the profperous and delired
ftate of the people is partely mainteined by plentie of good thmgcs
and peace at home,and partly by ftrong forceablc defenfes, whereby
it may be fafe againft outwarde violence : fo Chrift alfo doth enrichc
his with all thinges neceflarie to eternall faluation of foules,and for-
tificth them with ftrength, by v/hichlhcy may ftande inuincible a-»
gainft all aflaukes of fpirituall enemies. Whereby we gather,that he
reigneth more for vs than for himfelfe,and that both within & with-
cut:rhat being furnifhed, fo farre as God knoweth to be expcd'.ec for
vs, wirh the giftes of the fpirite, whereof we are naturally empty, we
may by thefe firft frutes perceiue that we are truely ioyned to God
vnto pcrfed blcflfednefle. And then , that bearing vs bolde vpon the
pov/er of the fame fpirit,we may not doubt that we fhallalway haue
the viftorie againft the Deuill,the worlde,and euery kinde of hurtc-
Luc. 17. full thing.To this purpofe tedcth the aunfwerc of Chrift to the Pha-
*^' rifesjihatbecaufethe kingdome ofGod is within vs,itftial not come
with obferuation . For it is likely that becaufe hcprofefled that he
was the fame king,vnder whome the foueraignc blefling of God was
,to be hoped for,they in fcorne required him to fliew forth his fignes.
hut
GodthcRcdemer. * Lib.2. 198
But he, bycaufe.they(who othenvife are to much bent to the earth)
fhouJd no: foolilhly reft vpon worldly pompes, biddeth the to enter
into their owne confcieceSjbycaufe the kiiigdome of God is rightc- Rai4.
oufnelTe , peace and loy in the holy Ghoft . Hereby wc are briefely »?•
taught,what i he kingdome of Chrift auaileth vs.For,bycaufe it is not
earthly or flefhly/ubicd to corruption, but fpirituall: he Iifceth vs vp
euen zo eternail life,that we may patiently paflc ouer this life in mi-
feries,hunger,colde,contempt,repioches,and other greues^conten-'
ted with this one thing,that our king will neuer leaue vs deftitutejbut
fuccour vs in our ncceflities, till hauing ended our warre,we be cal-
led to triumph. For fuch is his maner of reigning, to communicate
with vs all that he hath receiued of his father. Nowe whereas he ar-
meth and furniihcthvs with power, and garniflieth vswtthbeautic
and magnificcnce,enriche.th vs with wealchihereby is miniftred vnto
vs moft plentifull matter to glorie vpon , and alfo bolde courage to
fight without feare againft the Deuill,(mne and death. Fin3lly,that
clothed with his tighteoufnefle , we may valiantly ouercome all the
reproches of the woilde,and as he liberally hlleth vs with his giftes,
fo we againe for our parte^may bring forth frute to his; glorie.
$ Therefore bis kingly anointing is fet forth vnto vs , not done
with oyle or ointm^tes made with fpiccs , bur he is called the anoin-
ted of Godjbecaufe vpon him hath refted the fpirir of wifdome, vn-
derftandmg,coL'nlell,ftrength and feare of God. This is the oyle of
gladnefiTejV/hcrewithihePfalme reporteth that he wasannomted
aboue his fcllov/es,bec3ule if there were ncjt fuch excellencie in him,
we fhould be all needy and hungry.For,as it is already raid,hc is not i„h. j.
priuatly enriched for him felfe, but to poure his plenty vpo vs being 34.
hungry arui drie For as iu isfaid,rhat the fuhcr gaue the fpirite to his ^*^^- '•
fonne,not by mcafure, fo there is exprelfcd a 1 eafon why,that all we ' ^*
(hould rcceiue of his fulnefle,and grace for grace.Out of which foun-
taine floweth that liberall geuing , whereof Paule maketh mention, p .
whereby graceisdiucrflydifttibutcd to the fait!ifull,according to the
meafure of the gift of Chrift. Hereby is that which I faid, fufficiently
confirmcd,that the kingdome of Chrift confideth in the fpirit,not in
earthly delites or pompes,and therefore we nuift forfake the woilde
that we may be partakers of it. A vifible figne of this holy anointing lohn. 1.
was fhcwedinthe baptifmc of Chrift, when the holy Ghoft refted vp- 3»-
pon him in the iikeneffe of a doue. That the holy Ghoft and his gifts ^"^•J'
arc meante by the worde Anointing , ought to feeme neither nouel- ^'
tie nor abfurdiiie. For we are none other way quickenedjfpccially for
fo much as concerncth the heaucnly lifc:there is no droppe of huely
Cap. 1 5, Of the knowledge of
force invs, but that which the holy Ghoftpoureth into VJ, which
hath chofen his featc in Chrift , that from thenfe the heauenly ri-
cheffe might largely flowe out vnto vs, whereof we are (o needy. And
whereas both the faithfuU ftande inuincible by the ftrength of their
king,and al/b his fpirituall richefle plenteoufly flowe out vnto them,
they arc not vnworthily called Chriftians. But this eternitie whereof
J ^^^ we haue fpoken , is nothing derogate by chat faying of Paule : Then
i*y. %^, ^^ ^3il yelde vp the kingdome to God and the Father. Againe:The
I. Cor. fbnne him felfe (hall be made fubie<Se j that God may be all in all
*5'>8» thingcs : for his meaning is nothing els , but that in that fame per-
fcd glorie , the adminiftration of the kingedome (hall not be fuch as
it is now. For the father hath geuen all power to the fonnc , that by
the fonnes hande he may gouerne , cherifti and fuftcine vs , dcfende
vs vndcr his fauega^dc , and helpe vs. So while for a htle time we are
wauering abroad from God, Chrift is the meane betweene God and
vs, by htle and Utle to bring vs to perfed conioyning with God. And
traely,whercas he (itteth on the right hande of the father , that is as
much in effed, as if he were called the fathers dcputee, vnder whomc
is the whole power of his dominion , bycaufe it is Gods will to rule
and defende his Church by a mcanc ( as I may fo call it ) in the pcr-
fon of his Sonne . As alfo Paule doth expounde it in the firft chapi«
tcr to the Ephefians , that he was fct at the right hande of the father,
to be the hcade of the Church , which is his body. And to no other
meaning tendeth that which he teachethin an other place , that
Phi. 1 9 there is gcuen him a name abouc all names , that in the name of lefus
all knees fliould bow , and all tongues confeiTe that it is to the glorie
of God the Father . For euen in the fame wot des alfo he fetteth
outin the kingdome of Chrift anordre neceflaric for our prefente
weakcnefle . So Paule gathereth rightly , that God (hall then be by
him fclfe the onely head of the Church , bycaufe Chnftes office in
defending of the Church, fhall be fulfilled. For the fame reafon the
Scripture commonly calleth him Lorde , bycaufe his Father did fee
him ouer vs to this ende , to exercife jiis owne Lordely power by
him. For though there be many lordefhippes in the worlde, yet
is there to vs but one God the father, of whomearc all thingesand
we in hjm,and one Lord Chrift,by whome are all thinges and we by
him, faith Paule . Wherevpon is rightly gathered that he is the felfe
P- fame God,which by the mouth of Efaie affirmed him felfe to be the
xz, kingeand thelawemaker of the Church. For though he do euery
where call all the power that he hath, the benefit and gifte of the Fa-
ther, yet he mcaneth nothing els , but that he rcigneth by power of
God;
God the Rcdemcr. Lib.2. i^^
God rbycaufc he hath thcrforc put on y perfonage ofthc Mediator,
that defccndinge from the bofomc & incomprchenfible glory of the
father,hc might appioch nic vnto vs. And fo much more rightfuUit
is,that we be with all confent prepared to obey, and that with great
cherefulnefle we dircd our obediences to his commaundement.For
asheioyneth the offices of king and paflor toward them that wii.
lingely yeelde themfclues obedient : fo on the other fide we hcarc
that he bearcth an yron fcepter,to breake and broofe all the obftinatc
like potters veflcls : weheare alfo that he (halbe thciudgcofnati- pimio
ens , to couer the earth with deade corpfes , and to ouerthrowe the 4 .
heigth that ftandeth againft him. Of which thing there are fome ex-
amples feene at this day : but the full proufe thereof (halbe at the lall
iudgcmcnt, which may alfo properly be accomptcd the laft zd ofhis
kingdome,
6 Concerning his Pricfthood,thus it is briefly to be holdcn,thac
the endc and vfe of it is , that he fhoulde be a Mediator pure from all
(potte,that (houlde by his holincfle reconcile vs to God. But bycauft:
the iufte curfe poffcfTeth the entrie,and God according to his office of
iudge is bentc againft ys , it is necelTarie that fome expiation be vfed,
that he being a prieft may procure fauour for vs,to appeafe the wrath
of God. Wherefore , that Chrift might fulfill this office , it bchoucd
that he (lioulde come forth with a facnfice. For in the lawe it was not
lawefuU for the prieft to entre into the fanduarie without bloud, that
the faithfuU might know , that though there were a prieft become
mcane for vs to make intcrcelTion , yet God coulde not be made fa-
uourablc to vs before that our finnes were purged. Vpo which point
the Apoftle difcourfeth largely in the cpiftle to the Hebrucs,from the
feuenth chapiter almoft to the ende of the tenth. Butthefumme of
all commcth to this effed, that the honour of priefthoode can be ap-
plied to none but to Chrift , which by the facrifice of his death hath
wiped away our giltine(re,& fatisfied for our finncs.But how weighty
a matter it is, we are enfourmed by that folemne othc of God, which
was fpoken without repentance : Thou art a prieft foreuer, accor- pfa^itQ
ding to the ordrc of Melchifedech . For without doubt his will was 4.
to eftablilh that principall pointe , which he kncwc to be thechiefe
iointe wherevpon our faluation hanged. For , as it is faid, there is no
way open for vs or for our prayers to God , vnleflc our filthineiTe be-
ing purged, the prieftes do fandifie vs and obteine grace for vs , from
which the vndcanneiTe of our wicked doingcs and finnes doth de-
barrc vs. So do we fee, that we muft beginne at the death of Chrift,
thatihccfficacicandprofitcof his Pncilhoode may come vnto vs.
Cap.i^. Of the knowledge of
Ofthis it followeth that he is an ecernall interccfl'or , by whafe me-
diation we obteinc fauour,whervpon againc arifeth not only affiance
to pray , but alfo quieineffe to godly confcienccs , while they fafciy
Icane vpoathe fatherly tendernefl'c of Godjand arc certairviy pcrfwa-
dcd that it pleafcth him whatfoeuer is dedicated to him by ihc Me-
diator.Bat whereas in the time of the lawe,God commaundcd facri-
ficesofbcaftestobcofFeredtohim:iherc was another and a new or-
dre in Chrift,ihat one fhould be both the facrificed holt, & y Pricft:
becaufe there neither could be found any orhcr meetc fatisfadio for
iinnes , nor any was worthy fo great honour to offer vp to God his
oncly begotten fonnc.NowChriftbeareth the pcrfon of a pridl>r.oc
onely by etcrnall meanc of reconciliation to make the Father fauoii-
rablc & merc:fuU vnto vSjbut alfo to bring vs into the felowfliip of fo
great an honour. For we that are defiled in our relucs,yet being made
^ "*• * Prieftes in him do offer vp our felucs, & all ours to God, & do freely
enter into y heauely fanduariCjthat al the faeritice of pray er & praife
that come from vs, may be acceptable & fweeie fmelling in the fight
of God. And thus farre doth that faying of Chrifl cxtende:For their
loh. 17. fakes I fandific my felfe : becaufe , hauing his holmeffe poured vpon
*3* vs, in as much as he hath offered vs with himfelfe to his father, we
that otberwife do fiinke before himjdo pleafe him as pure & dcane,
yea and holy. Herevnto fcrueth the anointing of the fanduaric,
Dani.5. whereof mention is made in Daniell.For the comparifon of contra-
*^ rietieis to be noted betweene riiis anointing, and that Ihadowifh
anointing that then was in vfe:asif the Angell fliouldhaue faid, that
the (hadowes being driuen away, there fhould be a cleere pnef^hod
in the perfon of Chrift.And fo much more deteftable is their inuen-
tion>which not contented with the facrifice of Chrift,haue prcfumcd
to thruft in them felues to kill him:which is daily enterprifed among
ihc Papifles^where the Maffe is rcckencd a facriiicing of Chril^,
The xvj. Chapter.
Hew C^rij! hAth fulfilled the office of\edeemery to pMrchdee faltt4tion fir
Vij VVhtrtinisintreated »fhis'T)eaihyand'HjfurrecitfiH,
and his K^ffiendir.g into Heauen,
AL that wc haue hetherto faide of Chrift,is to be dirc<fted to
this marke, that being damned, dead, and lofl in our felues,
we may feeke for rightcoufnelfe, deliucrance, life and falua-
tion in him : as wc be taught by that notable laying of Peter,
j^ ' ^* that there is none other name vnder hcaucn geuen to men where-
in they niuft be faucd. Neither was the name of lefus gcucn him vn-
adui-
GodthcRedcmcr, Lib.2. 200
acluifedIy,or at chaufablc adueturc,or by the will of mcn,but brought
from hcaucn by the Angell the publifher of Gods decrce,and with a
reafon alfo affigncdcbccaufe he was fcnt to fauc the people from their
(innes. In which wordes that is to be noted,which we hauc touched ^^^' '
in an other place,that the office of redeemer was appointed him,that Lj^ g^
he fhoulde be our Sauiour ; but in the meane time our redemption j^
(hould be but vnpetfedjVnlcfTe he fiioulde by continual! procedingcs
conuey vs forwardc to the vttermoft marke of faluation. Thereforc>
(o Tone as we fwarue ncuer (b liclc from him , our faluation by iitlc
and litle vanifheth away, which wholy rellcth in him : fo that all they
wilfully fpoilc them felues of all grace, that rcfte not in him. And that
admonition of Bernarde is worthy to be rehcarfed, that the name of ^^}*
lefus is not only light,but alfo meatc,yea and oile alfo, without which m^j j^
all the meate of the foule is drie , and that it is alfo faltc without the
feafonning whereof all that is fct before vs is vnfauorie. Finally,thac
k is hony in the mouth , melodic in the care , and ioyfulnefTe in the
hearte, and alfo medicine , and that whatfocuer is fpoken in difputa-
tion is vnfauory,but where this name foundeth.But here it behoucth
to weye diligently, how faluation is purchafcd by him for vs : that we
may notonely be pcrfwadedthatheis the author of it,but alfo cm-
bracing fuch things as are fufficient to the ftedfaft vpholdinge of our
faith, wemay refufc all fuch thinges as might drawe vs away hethcr
or thethcr. For fitb no man can defcende into him felfe,and earncftly
confider what he is, but feeling God angry and bent againft him , he
bath needc carefully to feeke a meane and way toappcafe him,whichi
demaundeth fatisfadtion: there is no common aflbrednelTe requi*
red , becaufe the wrath and curfe of God lieth alwaie vpon finncrsj
til they be loofe from their giltinefle:who,as he is a righteous iudgc.
fufTereth not his lawe to be broken without punifhment, but is rea-
dy armed to reuenge it.
2 But before we goe any further , it is to be feenc by the way,
how itagrccth together,that God which preuented vs with his mer-
cie,was our enemie vntil he was reconciled to vs by Chrift.For how,
could he haue geuen vs in his only bej^otten Sonne a fmgular pledge
of his loue , vnlefle he had already before that embraced vs with his
free fauour ? Bycaufc therefore here arifeth fome fceming ofcon-
trarietie, I will firft vndo this knot.The holy Ghoft commonly fpea- r<,^ *
keth after this maner in the Scripturcs,that God was enemie to men, lo.
till they were reftored into fauour by the death of Chrifl; : that they G-iLj.
were accurfed till their iniquitie was purged by his facriticerthat they J^^*
were feuered from God,till they were receyucd into a conioyning by ^ ^^
Cap.i^. Of the knowledge of
his body. Such mancr of phrafes are applied to our capacitie«that we
may the better vnderftand how miferable and wretched our eftate
is being out of Chrift . For if it were not fpoken in exprefle wordes j
that the wrath and vengeance of God , and euerlafting death did reft
vpcn vs, we woulde lelfe acknowledge how miferable we {houldc be
without Gods mercic,and woulde lefle rcgarde the benefit of deliue-
rance. As for example. If a man hcare this fpoken to him : If God,at
fuch time as thou waft yet a (inner,had hated thce,and caft thee away
as thou hadft deferued.thou fhouldeft haue fuffered horrible deftru-
dion: but becaufe he hath willingly and of his owne free kindenefle
kept thee in fauour,& not fufFred thee to be eftraged fro him, he hath
fo deliuered thee from that perill : truely he will be moued with, and
in fome parte fecle how much he oweth to the mercie of God.But jf
he heare on the other fide that which the Scripture teacheth, that
he was by finnc cftraunged fi:om God,the heir of wrath , fubiedto
the curfe of eternall death j excluded from all hope of faluation,Ji
flranger from all blefling of God , the bondeflaue of Satan , captiuc
vnder the yoke of finne.Finally,ordeined vnto and already entangled
with horrible deftrudion,that in this cafe Chrift became an intercef-
for to entreat for him,that Chrift toke vpon him and fuffered the pu-
nifhment which by the iuft iudgement of God did hang ouer all fin-
ncrS;that he hath purged with his bloude thofe cuils that made them
hatefoll to God,thai by this expiation is fufficient fatisfadion and fa-
crificc made to God the father: that by this interccflbr his wrath was
appeafed : that within this foundation rcfteth the peace bciwene God
and men: that vpon this bonde is conteined his goodwill towarde
them: fhallnothe be fo much the more moued with the fe, as it is
more liuely reprefcnted , out of how great miferie he hath bene dc-
bucred?In a fummerbecaufe our minde can neither defiroufly enough
take holde of life in the mercy of God,nor receiue it with fuch thaker
fulncfle as we ought,but when it is before ftriken and thrownc downc
with the fearc of the wrath of God and dreade of eternall death , we
are fo taught by holy Scripture , that without Chrift we may fee God *
in mnner wrathfully bent againft vs , and his hande armed to our de^
ftrudion: andthat we may embrace his goodwill and fatherly kind-
ncfle no otherwhere, but in Chrift. t
3 And although this be fpoken according to the wcakcnefTe of
our capacitic, yet is it not falfely faide. For God which is the higheft
righteoufnefte , can not loue wickedncfle which he feeth in vs all.
Therefore we all haue in vs that , which is worthy of the hatred of
God. Therefore in refpcd of our coiTuptcd nature,and then of euill
life
GodtheRedemer. Lib.2. 201
life added vnto it , truely we are all in difpleafurc of God , gilcy in his
fight, and borne to damnation of hell. But becaufe the Lord will not
lofe tliat which is his in vs , he hndeih yet fomewhat that he of his
goodncfle may loue.For howfoeuer we be finners by our ownc fault,
yet we remaine his creatures. Howelbeuer we hauc purchaced death
to ourfelues, yet he made vs vnto life. So is hemoued by meere arwl
free louing of vs , to recciuc vs into fauour. But fiih there is a perpc-
tuali and vnappeafablc difagreement betwecne righteoufncfle and ini-
<juitie, fo long as we remaine (inncrs 3 he caanot recciue vs wholy.
Therfore, that taking away all matter of difagrecmentjhe might who-
ly reconcile vs vnto him , he doth by ejcpiatiop fet forth in th? death
of Chrift , take away whatfoeuer euillis in vs, that we, which before
weare vncleane and vnpure , may now appeare rightuous and holy in
bis %ht. Therefore God the Father doth with his Ipiie preuent and i. loha
go before our reconciliation in Chnft •• yea, bycaule he firft loued vs, 4- -S*
therefore he afterwardc doth reconcile vs vnto himfelfc.But bycaufe,
vntiU Chrift with his death come ro fuccour vs , there rcmaintth wic-
IcednefTe in vs , which dcferueth Gods indignation , and is accurfcd
and damned in his fight,therefore we arc not fully and firmcly ioyned
to God, vntill Chrift do ioyne vs. Therefore if we will aflure our fel-
ues to haue God made well pleafed and fauourable vnto vs , we muft
fatten our eyes and mindcs vpon Chrift onely :as in deedc we obtcin«
by bim oncIy , that our finnes be not imputed to vs , the imputing
whereofjdraweth with it the wrath of God.
4 And for this reafon Paule faitb,that the fame loue, wherewith
God embraced vs before the creation of the worlde, was ftayed and
grounded vpon Chrift . Thefe thingcs are plaine and agreablc with
the Scripture, and do make tliofc places of Scripture to accorde very
well together, where it is faide rthat God declared his loue towarde vs ^° °" J*
in thi5,that he gaue his oncly begotten fonne to death: and yet that Rom.*,
he was our cnemic till he was made fauourable againe tovs by the lo.
death of Chrift. But that they may be more Ikongly proued to them
that reqtnre the tcftamcnt of the olde Church,! will allege one place
of Auguftine, where he teacheih the very fame that we do.The loue Traft.
of God (faith he)is incomprehenfible and vnchangeable. For he be- inEuig,
ganne not to loue vs > fincc the time that wc weare reconciled to him ^®^°'*»
by the bloude of his fonnc. But before the making of the worlde he * °*
loued vs, euen before that we weare any thing at all , that we might
alfo be his children with his only begotten Sonne.Therefore wheras
we arc reconciled by the death of Chrift , it is not fo to be taken as
though the Sonne did therefore reconcile vs vnto him,that he might
CC
Cap.i^. Of the knowledge of
nowe beginne to loue vs whome he hated before : but we arc recon**
ciled to him that already loued vs, to whome \rc were enemies by
realon of finne. And whether this be true ornothatlfayj lerthe A-
*om foUh bearc witnefle. He doth commendc(raith he)his louc towardc
I. vs,bec3ufe when we were yet finnerSjChrift died for vs.He therefore
had a loue to vsjcuen the when we were enemies to him & wrought
wickednefle.Therfore after a marucllous and diuinc mancr he loued
vs, cuen then when he hated vs. For he hated vs in that we were fuch
as he had not made V9»j and becaufe our wickednefTe had on euery
fide wafted away his worke, he knew how in euery one of vs,boih to
hate that which we our felues had made , and to loue that which he
had made. Thefc be thewordesof Auguftine.
5 Nowe where it is demaunded, howe Chrift hath done away
our finnes , and taken away the ftrife betwene vs and God, and pur-
chafed fuch righreoufnes as might make him fauourable and wel wil-
ling towardc vs:it may be generally anfwered,that he hath brought
it to pafle by the whole courfe of his obedience.Which is proued by
R.om. 5. y teftimony of Paul. As by one mans offenfe many were made finners,
•5. fo by one mas obediecc we are made righteous. And inan other place
he extendeth the caufc of the paido that deliuereth vs from the curfc
of the lawcjto the whole hfe of Chrift, faying : When the fulnefle of
Gal. 4. time was comCjCod fente his fonne made of a woman,fubicd to the
4. lawe , to ledceme them that were vnder the lawe ; And fo affirmed
Matt.]. jj^3^ ^^ }^j5 ygpy baptifme was fulfilled one parte of righteoufnes, that
*^ he obediently did the commaundement of his father . Finally, from
the time that he toke vpon him the perfon of a feruaunt,he beganne
to payetheraunfome toredeeme vs. But the Scripture to fetoutthc
mancr of our faluation more certainely , doth afcribe this as peculiar
J. and proprely belonging to the death of Chrift . He him felfe pro-
18 , nounced that he gaue his life to be a redemption for many . Paule
Rom. 4. teacheth that he died for our finnes . lohn the Baptift cried out that
i 5' Chrift came to take away the finnes of the worldejbycaufe he was the
John. I . La^be of God. In an other place Paule faith , that we are iuftified
Rom. J. frt^ely by the redemption that is in Chrift, bycaufe he is fct forth the
Rom. 5. reconciler in his owne bloude. Againe , that we are iuftified in his
I. Cor. bloude , and reconciled by his death. Againe.. He that kncwe not
5'^ '• finne , was made finne for vs, that we might be the rightcoufneflc of
God Ml him. I will not recite all the teftimonies, becaufe thenumbre
wouldc be infinite , and many of them muft be hereafter alleged in
their order. Therefore in the fumme of bcleefe, which they call the
Apoftics creede , it is very ordicly paiTcd immediatly from the birth
of
GodtheRedemer. Lib.2. 202
of Chrift to his death and refurre(Sion,v/herein confifteth the fummc
of perfed faluation. And yec is not the refte of his obedience exclu-
ded , which he perfourmed in his hfe : as Paule comprehrndcth it Pbil.i.
wholy from the beginning to the ende in faying , that he abaced him
felfe,caking vpon him the forme of a feruant,and was obedient to his
father to death , euen the death of the crolfe. And truely euen in the
fame death his willing fubmiffio hath the firft degrce,becaufe the fa-
ciiHcc, vnleHe it had bene wiUmgly offred , had nothing profited to-
warde righrcoufnefl'e. Therefore, where the Lorde teitiHed, that he ^^^j, ,
gaue his foulc for his iheepCjhe exprclly addeth this, no man taketh n.
it away fnom my felfe^ According to the which meaning, Efaiefaiih, i^^^a. 53
that he helde his peace hke a lambe before the llicrtr. And the hjftorie 7-
of the Gofpell rehearfeth, that he went forth and met the fouldiers, ° " *
and before Pilate he Icfc defending of him Cclfe , and ftode ftill to Mac z'
yeldc him felfe to iudgementtobe proDOunccd vpon him. But that :.
not without fome ftrife ; for both he had taken our infirmities vpon
him, and it behoucd that his obedience to his father, flioulde be
this way tried . And this v/as no fclender (hcW of Ws incomparable
loue towarde vs , to wraftle with horrible feare,snd in the middefi of
the(e cruell tormentes,to caft away all caje of him[eife,that he mieht
prouide for vs. And this is to be beleued,that there could no facrifice
be wel offered to God any oiherwifc,but by this that Chrift forfaldng
, all his owne affcdion , did fubmitte and wholy yelde Kim felfe to his
fathers wiU.For proofe whcreofjthe Apcftlc doth fittly allege that tc- Heb.i:
ftimonieof thePfalme:Inthe boo^eof thclawcitis written of me, s.
that I may do thy will, O God. I will, and thy lawe is in the mid deft P'^^-4c
of my heart. Then 1 faide : Loe,I come. But becaufc trembhng con- **
fcienccs finde no refte but in facrifice and wafliing whereby linnes are
cleanfed:thereforc for good caufe we arcdireded thither, and in th^
death of Chrift is appointed for vs the matter of life . Nowe forafr
much as by our owne giltincflc, curfe was due vnto vs , before the
beaucniy iudgcmcnt feate of God,therefore fit ft of all is recited hovy
he was condemned before Ponce Pilate prefident of lurie : that wc
fboulde know that the punifhment wherepnto we were fubied, was
iuftely laide vpon vs. Wc coulde not cfcapc the dreadfull iudgement
of Qod : Chnft, to deliuer vs from it, furred himfclfe to be condem-
ned before a mortall man,yea a wicked & heathen man For the name
of the prefident is exprcffed not oneiy to procure credit to the hifto-
rie , but that we fhoulde learne that which Efaie teacheth , that that gQ^ -.
chaftifement of our peace was vpon him , and that by his ftripcs wc y.
were healed. For to take away our damnation , cucry kindc of deat{x
CC ij.
Cap. 1 6. Of the knowledge of
fufiiccd not for him to fufFer, but to fatisfic our redemption, one fpe-
ciall kindc of death was to be chofen , wherein both drawing away
our damnation to him felfe , and takmg our giitinefle vpon himfelfe,
he might deliucr vs from them both . If he liad bene murthercd by
theues, or had bene ragingly flaine in a commotion of the common
people : in luch a death there fhouldchaue bene noapparance of fa-
lisfadion.But when he was brought to be arrained before the iudge-
ment ieare, when he was accufed and pre0ed with witnelTes agamft
himjand was by the mouth of thciudge condemned to di^: by thefe
tokens we vnderftand , that he did bearc the perfon of a gilty man
and of an cuiil doer. And here arc two thinges to be noted, which
both were afore fpoken by the prophecies of the Prophetes , and do
bring a fingular comfort and confirmation of faith . For when wc
heare liiat Chrift was fent from the iudgcs feate to death, and was
hanged among theucs.wc haue the fulfilhng of that prophecie which
is allcdged by the EuangcUit. He was accompted among the wicked.
fj. 5 J. And why fo ? euen to take vpon him the ftcde of a finncr , not of a
!• man righteous or innocent , bycaufe he fuffred death not for caufc
lar. 15, of mnoccncie, but for finne. On the other fide when wc hearc that
he was acquired by the fame mouth whereby he was condemned,for
Pilate was compelled openly more than ones to bcare vitneife of his
innocencie : let that come in our minde which is in the other Pro-
fj. 5>5>. phet : that he repaycd that which he had not taken away. And fo wc
fliall beholde the perfonof a finncr and euiU doer reprefented in
Chrift : and by the open apparance of his innocencie it lliall become
plaine to fee, that he was charged rather with others offence than his
owne.He fuffred therefore vnder Ponce PilatCjand fo by the folcmnc
^1, jg fentence of the Prefident, was reckcned in the number of wicked
5t,' ' doers : but yet not fo , but that he was by the fame iudgc at the fame
time pronounced righteous, when he affirmed that he foundc no
c.iufe or condemnation in him.This is our afcqu!tal,that the giltincffc
which made vs fubied to punifhment , is rcmoued vpon the head of
the fonnc of God. For this fetting of the one againR the other , wc
ought prmcipnlly to holde faft,lealt wc tremble and be carefull all our
lifelong, as though the iufte vengeance of God did hang ouervs,
which the fonne of God hath taken vpon himfclfe.
6 By fide that , the very mancr of his death is not without a fin-
gular myfteric. The CrofTe wasaccurfed, notonelyby opinion of
men, but alfo by decree of the lawe of God. Therefore whenChrift
was hfted vp to the Crofre,hc made himi'elfe fubied to the curie. And
{q It bchoucd CO be done,that when the curfe was remoucd from vs
GodtheRcdemer. Lib.2. 203
to him , wc might be deliuercd from all curfe that for our Hnnes was
prepared for vs , or rather did already reft vpon vs . Whidi thing
was alfo by fhadowe expreflcd in the lawe. For the facriHces and la-
tisfadorie oblations that were oftred for finnes , were called A (he-
moth : Which worde proprely fignificch finnc it felfe . By which fi-
guratine chaunge of name, the holy Ghoft ment tofhewe , that they
were like vnto clcanfing playfters to drawc out to them felues , and
beare the curfe due to finnes . But that fame which was figuratiucly
reprefcnted in the facrificcs of Mofes > is in deede deliuered in Chrift
the originall paterne of all the figures . Wherefore he, to performe
a perfed expiation , gaue his owne foule to be an afham, that is a ^^^- 55'
fatisfadorie oblation as the Prophet calleth it , vpon the which our ^j"^
filth and punifliment might be caft,and fo ceflfe to be imputed to vs.
The Apoftle teftifieth the fame thing more plainly where he tea- 2.Cor,
cheth, that he which knewe no finne , was by his father made linne 5'*^v
for vs,that we might be made the righteoufnefle of God in him. For
the fonne of God being moft cleane from all fault , did yet put vpon
him the reproch and fliamc of our iniquities, and on the other fide
couered vs with his clca.nnefle. It feemcth that he meante the^me, Rora. 8.
when he fpeaketh of finne , that finne was condemned in his flefli. 3.
For the father deftroyedthe force of finne , when the curfe thereof
was remoued and layed vpon the flefti of Chrift* It is therefore de-
clared by this faying, that Chrift was in his death offred vp to his fa-
ther for a fatisfadorie facrifice , that the whole fatisfadion for finne
being ended by his facrifice , wc might ccfle to dread the wrath of
God. Nowc is it plainc , what that faying of the Prophet meaneth, ^(-^ -,
that the iniquities of vs all were layed vpon him , that is, that he en- ^ .
tending to wipe" away the fulthinefle of our iniquities , was himfelfe
as it were by way of enterchanged imputation , couered with ihem, .
Of this , the croflfe whereunto he was faftened was a token , as the
Apoftle teftifieth. Chrift (faith he) redeemed vs from the curfe of
the lawe, when he was made a curfe for vs. For it is written : Accur- ^ ^^'^'
fed is euery one that hangeth on the tree: that the blefling of Abra- Deu. 27
ham might m Chrift come to the Gentiles . And the (ame had Pe- 2^.
ter refped vnto, where he teacheth that Chrift did beare our finnes i-P«t.»
vpon the tree . Bycaufe'by the very token of the curfe we do more ^'^*
f)jainely learne that the burden wherewith we wereopprcfled was
ayed vpon him. And yet it is not fo to be vnderftanded,that he toke
vpon him fuch acurfc , wherewith himfelfe was ouerloden , but ra-
ther that in caking it vpon him, he did trcade downe, breake and dc-
ftroy the whole force of it . And fo faith conceiueth acquitall in the
C C iij.
Cap. 1 6. Of the knowledge of
condemnation of Chrift, and blefTmg in his being accurfed. Where-
fore Paude doth not without a caufc honorabiy reporte the triumph
that Chnft abteined to him felfe on th^ crofTcjas if the cix>ffe which
Was full of Ihame , had bene turned into a Chariot of rriumph. For
ol.i. ^"^c faith, that the hande writing which was againrt ys, was faftened
?. to the crofTe , 2nd the Princely powers were fpoyled and led openly,
Andnomaruell ; bycaufe (as the other Apoltle teftificth ) Chrift
^' offred vp himfclfe by the eternal! fpirire . And therevpon preceded
thatturnrng of the natureof thinges . But thatihefe thinges may
take fteadfaft i ootc , and be throtrghiy fetded in our hcartes , lettc vs
alvvay thinke vpon his facnfice and wafliing . For we couldc not cer-
tainely beleue that Chrift was the raunfome, redemption, and fatis-
f<»<ftion, vnlefl'e he had bene a facrificed hofte . And therefore there
is fo often mcndon made of bloud, where the Scripture (licwcth
tliemanerof our redemjng. Albeit the bloude of Chrift that was
fhed, fereed not onely for facrifice, but alfo in ftecde of walhiag , to
ch^anfe away our tilihmeffc.
7 It followeth in the Crede^that he was dead and buried.Whcre
a^ailie it is tq be feenc , howe he did euery where put him fclfe in
ourftedc,topaje the price of our redemption. Death held vsbounde
vnder his yokejChiift in our ftcde duiyclde hini fclfe into the power
[cb.a. of deaihjtod^liuervs from it. This the Apoftle meaneth where he
writeth, that he taftedof death for all men.For he by dying brought
to paifc that we (houlde not die , or ( which is all pne ) by his death
. he did re deme life for vs. But in this he differed from vs,that he gaue
him felfc to death as it were to be deuoured, not that he fhoulde be
fwallowcd vp with the gulfes of it , but rather that he flioulde fwal-
lowe vp it,of which we fliQulde hane bene prefently fwallowed:that
he gaue himfelfe to death to be (ubdued,not that he fhoulde be op-
prcffed with the power thereof, bur rather that he (lioulde ouer-
throw death which approched nere vs , yea and had already beaten
Icb. i. vs downc and triumphed vpon vs . Finally , that by death he might
^- dcftroy liim that had the power of death , that is the Deuill ; and
might dcliuer them that by feare of death were all their life long
fubicd to bondage . This is the tirft fruite that his death did bring
vs. An other is, that by encerpartening of him felfe with vs , he
mortifiethour earthlymembres, that they ftioulde no more here-
after vfe their owneworkes: and kiUeth our olde ipanne , that it
Ihouldc no more hue and beare frute. And to the fame purpofe per-
teincth his buYiall , that we beinq partakers thereof ,llioulde alfo be
jzL 2, l>u"cd to finne . For wheA the Apoftle teachcth that we arc grafted
into
GodthcRedemcr. Lib.2. 204
into the likcneflfe of the death of Chrift,ancl buried with him to the 'P- and
death of finnc, that by his crolfethe worlde was cruciHed to vs, ^•'4*
and we to the worlde , that we are dead together with him, he doth
not onely exhorte vs to expreffe the example of Chriftes death, but Col.j.j
he declareth that there isruchefFcdualneireinic, as ought toap-
perein all Chriftians, vnlefTe they will make his death vnprofica-
ble and frutelcffe. Therefore in the death and buriall of Chrift,'
there is offred vs a double benefit to be enioyed , that is deliuerance
from death, wherevnio we were become bonde, an^ the moitifyiag
of our flefh.
8 But it is not mectc to ouerpaflc his going downe to the helles,,
wherein is no fmall importaunce to the effed of redemption. For
although it appeareth by the writinges of the olde fathers , that
that parte which is read in the Crede was not in olde timefomCich
vfed in the Churches : yet in entreating of the fummeof our doc-
trine , it is neceffarie that it haue a place allowed it , as a thing that
conteineth a very profitable and not to be defpifed myftery of a right
weighty matter. And there are alfo fome of theoldenvriters thac
do not leauc it out. Whereby we may geflfc, that it was after a cer-
taine time added > and did not prefently but by litle and licle giowc
in vfc in the Churches . But this ccrtainely is out of queftion , that
it preceded of the common iudgement of all the godly : For as much
as there is none of the Fathers that doth not in his writinges make
mention of Chriftes going downe to the helles , although after di-
uerfemanerof expofition. Butbywhome, or at what time it was
firft added , maketh litle to the purpofe . But rather in the Creede
this is to be taken heede vnto, that we therein certainely haue a
full and in all pointcs pcrfcd fumme of our faith,whcremto nothing
may be thruft , but that which is taken out of the moft pure worde
of God. Nowe if any will not for precife curiofitie admit it into the
Credcjyetfhallit ftreightway bemadetoappercplainely, that it
is of fo great importance to the fumme of our redemption , that if ic
be Icfte out , there is loft a great parte of the frute of the death of
Chrift . There are againe fame that thinke , that there is no newc
thing fpoken in this article , but that in other wordes the fame thing
is repeted which was fpoken before of his buriall; forafmuchas
the worde Infernum , hell , is in the Scripture oftentimes vfed for the
graue . I graunt that to be true which they allege of the fignifica-
tion of the worde , that Hell is oftentimes taken for the graue: but
there are againft their opinion two reafons, by which I am cafily per-
fuaded K(> diffent frgm them p For what an idienefte were it , when
CC iiij*
\j:.i
Cap»i 6. Of the knowledge of
• cardeiTely and as it were , in fporte to come foorch co fufFer death ?
But this was a true proufe of his infinite mercy jnot to fhun y death
which he lb fete trembled at. And it is no dour that the fame is the
ie.s*?. Aportles mcamng to teach, in the Epiftie to the Hebrues, where he
wrytcth : that Chrift wa5 heard of his owne Feare ; fome tranflate it
Reucrence or piety, but how vnficly, borh the matter u fclfe^and the
very manner of fpeakinge proueth . Chrift therefore prayihge with
icaresandmighty eric, IS hear de of his owne feare : not to be free
from dcaih,but not to befwallowtd vp of death as a finner: becaufe
in that place he had but^our perfon vpon him . And truely there can
be imagined no more dreadful! bottomlefTc depth-,than for a man to
fcle himfelfe forfaken and eftraunged from God, and not to be heard
when he calleih vpon him, cuen as if God himfelfe had confpired to
his dcftrudion. Euen thither we fee that Chrift was throwcn dowhtf,
fo farre that by enforccmet of diftrcfle he was compelled to crie out:
>ral.»». My God , My God , why haft thou forfaken me ? jor whereas fome
►• would haue it taken, that he fo fpake rather according to the opiniQ
'^^•*7 of oihcr,tha as he felt in himfelfe-y is in no cafe probable/orafmuch
^ ' as it IS euident , that this faying proceeded out of the very anguifti of
the bottomc of his heart. Yet do we not meane thereby ,tnat God was
at any time his enemy or angry with him. For how could he be angry
fidt with his beloucd fonnc,vpon whom his minde refted^Or how could
t"\ Chrift by his intcrceflio appeafe his fathers wrath toward other , h.a-
■e<aati. ui"ge him hatefully bent agaynft himfelfe ? But this is oar meaning:
jead that he fufteredthe grceuoufneffe of Gods rigour, for that he being
Kegin. ftnken and tormented with the hande of God, did fcle all the tokens
Li.4d€ of God when he is angry and punifheth. Wherupon Hylary argueth
l['".& 'hu5,that by this goini^e downe we haue obtained this, that death is
Li'b.3. flayne. And in other places he agreeth with our iudgement, as where
he fayth.The crofre,death,and hels are our hfe. Againc in an other
place. The fonne of God is in the hels, but man is caried vp to hea-
ucn. But why do I alleage theteftimony of a priuate man, when
the Apoftleaffirmeth the fame, rehcarfini^thisfora frute of hisvi-
^ory,that they were deliuered which were by feare of death all their
life long fubicd to bondage ? It behoued therfore,ihat he ftiall ouer-.
come that feare,that naturally doth continually torment and opprcfle
all mortall men : which coulde not be done but by fightingc with it.
Moreouer , that his feare was no common feare or concciued vpon
a fclcndcr caufc, ftiall byandby more p'laincly appearc.So by fighting
hande to hande with the power of the Dcuill, withthchorrourof
death, with the paynes of the hcb it came to paflc, that he both had
«;h^
GodtheRedemer. Lib.2. 206
the vi6lory of theni,and triumphed oucr thcm,that we now in death
flioulde no more feaic thofe thinges , which our Prince hath (wal-
lowed vp.
£z Here fome leud men,ahhough vnle*irned,yet rather moued by
malice than by ignoraunce , crie out that I do a hainous wronge to
Chriftjbecaufe it was againft conuenicncy of reafonjthat he flioulde
be fearefullfor the faluation of his foule. And then they more hardly
enforce this cauillation with fayinge , that I afcribe to the fonne of
God defperarion , which is cotrary to faith.Firft they do but malici-
oufly moue controuerfie of Chrifts feare and tremblmge , which the
"Euangehilcs do fo plainely reporte.For alitie before that the time of
hisiicath approched , he was troubled in fpirite and palfioneth with
heauineire,and at his very mcetmg with it,he began more vehcmec-
ly to tremble for feare. If they fay that he did but counterfait, that is
too foule a ihj ft. We murt therfore as Ambrofe truly teacheth,bold-
ly confciife the forowfulnelle of ChriltjVnkfi'e wc be afhamed of l\;s
crolfe . And trucly if his foule had not bm partaker of payne, he had
bin Only a redeemer for bodies. But it behoued that he fliouid wra-
ftle 3 to raife vp thera that lay throwen dovvne . And his heauenly
glory is fo nothinge appaired thereby , that euen herein glorioufly
fiiineth his goodnelfe which is ncucr fufficiently prayfed, that he re-
fufed not to take our weakenefles vpon him. From whcnfe is alfo that
comforteof our anguiflics and forrowes , which the Apoftle fcttcth
before vs : that this Mediatour did feele our infirmities , that he
might be the more earneftly bent to fuccour vs in mifery . They fay: He.4.i 5
that thatthinge which is euiil of it felfe , is vnworthiiy afcnbed to
Chrift . As though they were wifer than the fpiritc of God , which
ioyneth theli two rhinges together , that Chrift was in all thinges
tempted as we are , and yet that he was without (innc . Therefore
tliere is no caufc that the weakenes of Chrift (hould make vs afrayd,
whereunto he was not by violence or necefljtye compelled , but by
mcerclouc of vs and by mercy was led to fubmit himfelfc. And what
foeuer he ofhis owne will fuftered for vs,diminifheth nothinge of his
power . But in this one poynte are thefe backebiters dccciuedjthat
they do not perceiue in Chrift an infirmity clcane and free from all
fault and fpot , becaufe he kept himfelfc within the boundes of obe-
dicn^.For wheras there can be found no moderation in our corrupt
naturt:, where all our affcdios do with troublefome violence excede
all meafure,they do wrong to mcafure y forme of God by that ftan-
dard . But when man was in his vncorrupted ftate, then there was a
moderation hauinge force iw all bis afFcdions> to teflraync exccflfe.
Cap.i^. Ofthc knowledge of
Whereby , it might well be that he was like vnto vs in forroWjdread,
and fearefulnes,and yet that by this markc he differed from vs.Being
fo confuted j they leape to an other cauillacion , that though Chrift
feared deathjyet he feared nor the curfc and wrath of God fro which
he knew himfelfc to be fafe. But let the godly readers weye how ho-
norable this is for Chrift , that he was more tender and more feare-
ftjll than the moft part of the very rafcall fort of men. Thcues and o-
thcr tuill doers do obftinatly haft to dcath»many do with haute cou-
rage defpifc it : fome other do mildly fufter it.But what conftancy or
ftoai courage were it, for the fonne of God to be aftoniflied and in a
maner ftriken dead with feare of it ? For euen that w among the co-
mon forte might be accompted miraculous, is reported of him, that
for vehemency of griefc,very droppes of bloud did fall from his face.
Neither did he this to make a (hew to the eyes of other,[^but whein a
fccret corner whither he was gone out of company, he groned vnto
his £«her. And this putteth it out of alldout,that it was nedefull that
he fhould haue Angels to come downe from heauen to relieue him
wiih an vnwonted maner of comforting.How fhamefull a tenderncs,
as I layd , (hould this haue bin , to be fo farre tormented for feare of
common death, as to melt in bloudy fwcate, and not to be able to be
comforted but by fight of Angels? What ? doth not that praier thrifc
repcatcd,(Faiher,if itbc poftible,let this cnppe depart from me)pr6-
cccding from an incredible biiterncfle of heart,(hew that Chrift had
a more crucll and harder battcll than with common death? Whereby
appeareth that thofe triflers againft whom I now difpute , do boldly
babble vpon things that they know not, becaufe they neuer carneft-
ly confidered what it is , or of how great importance it is that we be
redeemed from theiudgemcnt of God. But this is ourwifdom, well
to vndcrftande howe deere our faluation did coft the fonne of God.
Now if a man {hould aske me,if Chrift went then downe to hcl,whe
he prayed to efcape that death:I anfwere, that the was the b|?ginning
of it:whercby may begathered,howgrieuous and terrible tormcntes
he fufFered , when he knew himlelfe to ftande to be arained for our
caufe before the iudgement feate of God.But although for a momec
of time,the diuine power of the fpirite did hide it felTc, to giue place
to the weakenefle of the fleHi : yet muft we know , that the tentarion
by feehngof forrow and feare was fuch as was not againft faith. And
fo was that fulfilled which is in the Sermon of Peter , that he couldc
not be holdcn ofthc forrowcs of death,bec3ufe whe he felt himfelfc
as it were forfaken of God, yet he did nothing at all fwarue from rhe
truft of his goodncffc. Which is proucd by that his notable callmgc
vpon
GodtheRedcmer, Lib.2. 207
▼pon God , when for extremity of peine he cried out. My God, my Mat. 17
GodjWhy haft thou forfakcn me? For though he was aboue meafure ^T*
gTeued,yet he cefleih not to cal him hu God,of whom he crieth out
that he was forfaken , Moreouer hereby is confuted as well the er-
rour of Apollinaris , as theirs that were called Monothehtes. Apol-
linaris faincd that Chrift had an eternall fpirite in fteadc of a foule,{b
that he was oncly but halfc a man . As though he could clcanlc our
finnes any other wayjbut by obeying his father.But where is the affe-
^ion or will of obedience but in the foulc ? which foule of his we
knowe was troubled for this purpofe to dnue away feare, and bringc
peace and quieineflc to our foule. Againe, for confiifion of the Mo-
notheliteSjWe fee how now he willed not that thing according to his
nature of manhoode,which he willed according to his nature of god-
head. I omit ro fpeake how he did fubdue the aforefaid feare with a
contrary affcdion. For herein is a piaine (hew of contrariety. Father loh.ii,
deliuer me from this hoar , But cucn herefore I came eucn into this *?•
hour. Father glorifie thy name. In which perplexity yet was there
no fuch outrage in him as is feenc in vs , euen then when we moft of
all endeuour to fubdue our felues.
I ^ Now followcth his refurrcdion from the dead, without which
all that we haue hitherto, were but vnperfed.For fith there appeareth
in the crofle,death,& buriall of Chrift nothing but weakeneffe : faith
muft paflfe beyond all thofe things, that it may be furnifhed with full
ftrength. Therefore although we haue in his death a full accomplifh-
ment of faluation, becaufe by it both we are reconciled to God, and
his iuft iudgement is fatistied, & the curfe taken away,and the penal-
ty fully payed : yet we are fayd to be regenerate into a huinge hope,
not by his death , but by his rifinge agame.For as he in rilinge againe i Pc.r.|
rofe vp the vanquifher of death, (b the vidory of our faith confifteth
in the very refuriedion:but how this is,is better expreflcd in y words
of Paule. For he fayih, thjlt Chrift died for our (innes>and was raifed
vp againe for our iuftification ; as if he fhovild haue faydrthat by his *^®*^*^
death finne was taken away,and by his rifing againe righteoufnes wbs
renewed and reftorcd. For how coulde he by dyinge deliuer vs from
death if he himfelfc hadde lyen ftill ouercome by death ?How couidc
be haue gotten vuftory for vs , if himfclfe hadde bin vanquiflied in
fight } wherefore w^o fo parte the tnattcr of our faluation betwenc
the death and refurredion of Chrift, that by his death we fay finnc
was taken away and death deftroied , and by his rcfurrcdion rightc-
oufnefte was repaired,and life raifed vp againe : but fo that by meane
of his refurie^ion , his death doth ftiew foorth her force and efifed^
Cap.i^. Of the knowledge of
viuo vs. Therefore Paule affirmeth , that in his very refurredfoti hie
was declared the fonne of God , becaufe then atlafthe vttercdhfs
heauenly power, which is both a cleare glafTe of his godhcade, and a
ftedtsft Ihy of our faith . As alfo in an other place he teacheth, that
i.Cor. Chrift fuft'ered afrer the vr eakeneffc of the flefh, & rofe againe by the
i>^4. power of the fpirit.Andin y fame meaning. in an other place , where
Phi. 5. he entrcatcth of perfedion , he faythrthat 1 may know him and the
'°* power of his refurre<5li6.Yet byandby after be adioynctbthe fellow-
(liip with death . Wherewith moft aptly agreeth that faying of Pe-
i.Pct.i. ter ; that God raifed him vp from the deade and gaue him glory, that
"• our faith and hope might be in God;not that our faith being vphoU
den by his death lliould wauer,but that the power of God which ke-
peth vs vnder faith , doth principally fliew it felfe in the refurredion,
Therfore let vs remcmber5that fo oft as mention is made of his death
onely, there is atfo comprehended that which properly belongeth to
his refurrcdton ; and hke figure of comprehcnfion is there in the
word Refurredi5,as ofr as it is vfed feuerally without fpeaking of his
death , fo that it draweth with it that which peculiarly pcrtayncth to
his death. But forafmuch as by rifing againe he obtained the crow'ne
ofconqucftjfothat th/sre fliould bebothrcfurredionand life:there-
i.Cor. £Qfg Paule doth for g©od caufe affirme that faith is deftroyed , and
*^''^* the Gofpellis become vaine & dceeitfuljif the refurredionof Chrift
be nor fattened in our hearres. Therefore in an other place, after he
h^d gloried in the death of Chrift agaynft all the teriours of damna-
Fom. 8. tion,to amplrfie the Cjme,he fay thfurther : Yea the fame He which
3 4. dyed , is rifen vp againe and nowe ftandeth a Mcdiatour for vs in the
prefence of God. Furthermore as we haue before dectaredjthat vpon
the partakinge of his croffe hangeth the mortification of our flefli.fo
is it to be vndciftandcdj that by his refurrcdion we obtaine an other
commodity which aunfwereth tliat mortification. For (fayth the A-
Ro.<f .4. poftlej we are therefore grafted into the Iikcneflfe of his deaxh , that
being partakers of his refurredion,we may walke in newnefle of hfc.
Col. 3. 5 Therefore in an other placctas he gathcrcrh an argument of this that
we are dead together with Chrift, to proue that we ought to morti-
fie our members vpon earth : likewife alfo , becaufe we are rifen vp
Col. 5,1 with Chriftjhc gathereth therupon that we ought to fceke for thofe
thinges that are aboue , and not thofethat ai^e vpon the earth. By
which wordes we are not onely exhorted to be raifed vp after the
example of Chrift,to folow a newnefle of life.But we arc taught that
it is wrought by his power that we arc regenerate into righteoufnes.
We obtainealfo a third frute of his rcfurc^ion , that vre are, as by an
earned
God the Rccjemcr. Lib.2. 208
earnetl deliucrcd vs , aflured of ouv owne refurrcdion , of which wc
knowe that his refurredion is a moft certaine argument. Whereof
he difputeth more at large in the fiftecne chapter of his firft Epiftlc
to the Corinthians. But by the way this is to be noted,that it is fayd,
that he rofe againe from the dead : in which fayingc is expreflcd the
trueth both of his death and of his refurrcdionras if it had bin fayd,
that he did both dye the fame deaih thac other menne naturally do
die, and receiucd immortahty in the fame flefti which he had put on
mortall.
1 4 To his refurrc Aion is not vnfitly adioyned his afccnding into
heauen.For although Chrift beganne more fully to fet forth his glo-
rie and power by rifingc againe , for that he had now layd away that
bafe and vnnoble eftate of n>ortallife,and the fhamc of the crofleryct
by his afccndinge vp into heauen onely, he truely beganne his king-
dome.Which the Apoftlc rticweth where he tcacheth,that Chrift a-
Tcended to fulfill all thingcs. Where in feeming of repugnacy he ihe- , J^**'*"
wcth that there is a goodly agrccmcnt:becaufe he fo departed fro vs,
that yet his prefence might be more profitable to vs , which had bin
penned in a bafe lodginge of y flefli,while he was conuerfant in earth.
And thcrfore lohn, after that he had rehearfed that notable calling, ioh.7.
If any thirft, kt hin\comc to me, &c. Byandby fayth , that the holy J7.
Gboft was not yet giuentothefaithfull, becaufc lefus was not yet
glorified. Which the Lord himfelf alfo did teftific to the DifcipleSjfay- JqI,^ j^^
inge:Itis expedient foryou that I go away. Forif Ido notgo away, 7.
the holy Ghoft fhall not come. But he giueth them a comfort for his
corporall abfence, that he will not leaue them as parentleffcjbut will
come againe to them after a certaine manner, in deede inuifible, but
yet more to be de(ired,bccaufe they were the taught by more aflured
experience, thattheauthoritie which he cnioycth, and the power
which he vfeth,is fufficient for the faithfull,not onely to make them
liuc bleflfcdly, but alfo to die happily . And truely wc fee howe much
greater abundance of his fpirite he then poured out,how much more
royally he then aduaunced his kingdome,howe much greater power
he then {hewed,both in helpinge his, and in ouerthrowinge his enc-
mies.Being therforc taken vpinto heauen, he toke away the prefence
of his body out of our fightmot to ccfle to be prefenc with the faith-
full that yet wandred in the carth,but with more prefent power to go-
uerne both heauen and earth. But rather the fame that he had promi-
fed,that he would be with vs to the end of the worldc,hc performed
by thishisafcendinge, by which as his boJie was lifted vppeabouc
allhcauens, fo his power and cffc<^uaii workingewas pouredani
Cap. X 6. Of theknowledge of
fprcd .ibroadc beyondc all the boundes of heaiicn and earth . But thif
Trafla. ^ h^d rarhsr co declare in Auguttines wordes than mine owne.Chnft
in Eua. (fayth he) was to go by death to the right hande of the father, from
lohan. whcnfe he is to come to iudge the quicke & the dead:& that likewifc
^^^' in bodily prefencc according to the founde dodrine and rule of faith.
For in fpirituall prefence with them, he was to come after his afcen-
Con. And in an other place more largely and plainely : Accordinge to
an vnfpeakeable & vnuifible grace is that fulHlled which he had fpo-
Mat.iS ken: behold I am with you all the days,euen to the end of the world.
ao. But accordinge to the flcih which the Word tookc vpon him, accor-
dmg to that that he was borne of the Virgin,accdrding to that that he
was taken of the lewes, that he was fattened on the tree, that he was
taken downe from the crolTe , that he was wrapped in linen clothes,
that lie was layd in the graue> that he was openly fhewed in his rifing
againerthis was fulfilled , Ye fhallnot alway haue me with you. Why
Aft I } ^^^ becaufe he was conuerfant according to the prefence of his body
&^. ' forty dayes with hisdifciples,and they being in his company, feeing
him,not foilov/ingc hini) hcafccnded mtohcauen and is not here/or
he (ittcth there, at the right hande of his Father : and is here,for he is
not gone away in prefence of maieflie . Therefore according to the
prefence of his maielhc,wc alway haue Chrift : aircording to the pre-
Mar.i5. f^'iice of his flefh , it was truely faid to his Difcifles : but me yc fhall
Hcb.1.3 not alway haue. For the Church had him a fewe dayes according to
the prefence of his fledi, but now (he holdeth him by faith, butfeeth
him not with eyes.
1 5 Whcrforcjit byandby followcih,that he is (itten downe at the
right hande of his father:which is fpoken by way of fimjhtude,takcn
of princes that haue their litters by, to whom they commit their of-
fice to rule & gouerne in their ftede.So it is faidjthat Chrift,in whom
the father will be exalted and rcigne by his hand : was receaued to fit
at his right hande ; as if it had bene faid , that he was inuefted in the
dominion of heauen and earth, folemnly entred vpon the poflcilion
of the gouernment committed vnto him , and that he not onely en*
tred vpon it , but alfo contiaucth in it till he come downe to iudge-
BpliM. mem. For fodoth the Apoftle cxpounde it, when he faith thus : The
'^•. father hath fet him at his right hand, aboue all principahtie & power,
I, Cor*. 2"^ ftrength and dominion, and eucry name that is named not onely
15,27. in this worldcjbut in the worlde to come.&c. He hath put all thinges
iphe.4- vnder his feete,and hath geuen him to be head of the Church abouc
■ 5- all thin^cs. Nowc you fee to what purpofe bclongeth that fitting, that
«) &*? '* » t^at »^1 creatures both heauenlv and earthly may with admiration
God the Redefner. Lib.2. 2op
lookc vpon his maicftic , begouernedwithhishiincie, beholdc his
countenance, and be fubied to his power. And the Apoftles meanc Hcb.i
nothing elsjwhcn they fo oft rchcarfe itjbut to tcach,that ail rhiiiges
are lefc to his will . Therefore they thinke not rightly, which thinkc
that bUffednefle is onely meant by it. And it forcerh not,that in the
Ades,Stephen teftificth ;hat he law him ftadingjbccaufc we fpeake ^^''^
not heare of the geflure of his body>but of the maiefty of his domi-
nion:fo that to Sit is nothing elie^but to be chiefc iud^e in the hca-
uenly iudgemcnt fear.
16 Hereupon doth fayth gather manifolde fiute : For it learneth,
that the Lord by his afcending into heauen,hath opened the entric
of the heauenly kingdom,\vhich before had bin flopped vp by Ada.
For when he entred into it in our flefli as in our name,therupon fol-
loweththat which the Apoftle fayth,that we do already in him after £ j, ^
a certaine manner (inn heauen . Forthat we do not with bare hope
looke for hcauen,but already in our heade we poifefle it. Moreouer
faith perceiucth that he fitteth with his father to our great benefite.
For he is entred into a fanftuary not made with hands,and there ap- Hcb.7
peareth before the face ofthe Father a continuall sduocate & inter- as &:
ceflTor for vs : he fo turneth the fathers eves to his ritzhteouines.that *'•
he turneth them away from our (innes : He fo reconcileth his mmdc ^ ^
vnto vs, that by his intercefhon he prepareth vsa way and paflage fo j^, '
his throne,filline it withgrace & mercifr/mcs, which otherwife would
hauc bin full of horrour to wretched finners. Thirdly, faith concei-
ueth his power, wherein confiftfth our i}rcngth;mfght,welthj& glo-
rying againft the hels.For afcending into heaue he led csptnucy cap- Ephe.
tiuc, & fpoiling his enemies he enriched his people,and daily filleth ^.
them with heapcs of fpirituall richefle . He fitteth therefore on hrr %
that from thenfe pouringe out his power vnto vs,hc may quicken vs
to a fpirituall life>fandifie with his fpirit5and garnifh his church with
the diuerfe giftes of iiis grace,preferue it fafe againft all hurtes by his
protcdi6,reftraine with the itrength of his hand the raging enemies
of his crolTe and of our faluation: finally, hold all power both in hea- p{« ,,
ucn and in earth, till he haue ouerthrowen all his enemies which arc
alfoour enemies,& made pcrfed the building vpofhisChurch. And
this is the true ftate of his kingdome;ihis is the power that his father
hath giuen him,till he make an end ofthe laft ad,whcn he commcth
to iudge the quicke and the dead.
17 Chrift doth in dcde here (hewtothcthatbchis,pIaineproucs
of his power prefcnt among them; but becaufc vnder the bafenes of
fle(h his kingdotn doth in a manner he hidden in earth,thereforc for
Cap.i 6. Of the knowledge of
good caufe is faith called to thinke vpon that vihbk prefenccwhidb
A6t. I . he wili openly (hew at the iaft day.Forhe fhali in vifible forme come
1 1. dov/ne from heauen,euen fuch as he was feene to go vp ; and he fhail
Mac. 24. appeare to all men with vnfpeakeable maiefty of his kingd<5mc, with
^°' bright gliftering of immortality ,with infinite power of godhead, with
a gard of Angeis. From thenfe therefore we are bidden to lookc for
him to come our rcdemer at that day,wh6 he fhal feuerc the Lambcs
from the Goates , the chofen from the forfaken:& thetc ftialbe none
of all either the quickc or the dead , that fhall cfcape his iudgement.
For fro the furtheft corners of the world fhall be heard the found of
Mat. 25 the tropet, wherewith all Ihall be called to his iudgement featCjboth
3 '• they that fhalbe founde aliuc at that day , and they whom death hath
I .The. 4 before take out ofthe company ofthcquicke. Some there be that in
this place expound the wordes of the qiiicke and the dead otherwife:
and \vc fee that fome of the olde wryters did ftlcke m dout vpon the
conftrudion of this article. But as the aforefayd meaning is plaine &
easie to perceiueifo doth it better agree with the Crede w is cuident
that it was wrytten according to the capacity of the common people.
. And herewith nothing difagreeth that which the Apoftleaffirmcth,
,- *^* that it is appointed to allmen once to die. For although they which
fhall remaine in mortalUife at the bft iudgement.fhallnotdic after a
naturall manner and order:yet that change which they (hal fuffcr^be-
caufe it fhalbe like a death , is not vnproperly called death , It is in
I Cor. <leede certaine,that not all fhall ficpe,but all Ihalbe chaunged.What
1*5, -u meaneth that? In one moment their mortalUife (hall periih and be
fwallowed vpandbe vtterly transformed into a newe nature . This
peiirhinge of the flefh no man can deny to be a death : and yet in the
meane time it remaineth true,tbat the quicke & the dead flialbe fum*
moned to the iudgementrbecaufe the dead that are in Chrift fhal firft
i.Tbe.4 j,j^^^ ^^j ^1^^^ ^l^^y J. j^^j ^gjl remaine and be huinge, (hall with them
be fodenly taken vp into the ayre to meete the»Lord. And truely it is
AS. lo. h'xely that this article was taken out of the fermon of Peter , which
♦2 Luke recitcth , and out of the folcmne proteftation of Paule to Ti-
2.Tim,4 moihe. *
' • 1 8 Hereupon arlfeth a Angular comfort,when we heare that he is
iud-:c, which hath alredy appointed vs parteners with him in judging:
fo far is it of,that he will go vp into the iudgement featc to condemnc
vs.Forhow ilioulile the mod; merciful! prince deftroy his owne peo-
ple? how (hould the head fcattcr abroade '-.is owne members ? howe
?om, 5. fhouldc rhc patrone comiemns bis owne clientcs? For if the Apoftle
dare cirie out, that while Chrift is interceflour for y5,there can none
come
GodtheRcdemcr. Lib.2. 210
Come forth that can condemnc vs : ii is much more true , that Chrift
himfelfe bcinge our intcrcellour, will noc condemn<; them whom he
liath receiucti mio his charge and tuition. It is truely no fmall aflli-
rednes , that we (lialbe brought before no other iudgemcni fcatc, but
of our ownc redeemer, from whom our faluation is to be looked for:
moreoucr that he which now by the Gofpel promifcth eternsli blcf-
fednclfe, (hall then byfittinge in judgement performe his promife.
Therefore to this end the father hath honored the fonne,in giuinge j^, ^
him all judgement , thatfohe hath prouidedfortheconfciences of 23,*
them that be his,rremblingfor feare of the iudgemei. Hitherto I haue
followed the order of the Apoiiles Crede,becaufe whereas it Ihortly
in fewe wordes contayneih the chiefe articles of our redemption, ic
mayferuevs for a table, wherein we dodirtin<ftly and fcucrally fee
cholc thingcs that arc in Chrift Vv orthy to be taken heede vnto. 1 call
it the Apoitles Crecde,not carefully regarding who were the author
of it. It is truely by great confcnt of the olde wrytcrs afcnbed 10 the
Apoftles, either bccaulc they thought that it was by common tra4
uaile wryiten and fct out by the Apoftles , or for that they iudged
that this abridgement being/aith fully gathered out of the dodnnc,
dehucrcd by the handes of the Apoi^les,was worthy to be confirmed
with fuch a title. And I take it for no dout,that whenfc Co cucr it pro-
ceeded at the lirft,it hatheuen from the firft beginning of the church,
and from the very time of the Apoftlcs>be vfedas a pubhkc confcf-
fion , and receiued by confent of all men . And it is likely that it was
not priuately wrytten by any one man, forafmuch as it is euident that
euen from the farthcft age it ha:h alway continued of facred autho-
rity and credit amonge all the godly. But that thingcwhich is onely
to be cared for , we haue wholly out of con^trouer fie, that the whole
Hiftory of our faith is fliortly and wcl in diftind order rehearfed in ic,
and that there is nothinge contayned in it that is not fealed with
founde teftimonics of the Scripture. Which beingc vndcrttandcd,it is
to no purpofe either curioufly to dout , or ro ftriue with any mannc,
who were the autor ofitivnlefTe pcrhappe it be notcnough for fome
man to be aflured of the trueth of the holy Ghoft , but if he do alfo
Tnderftand either by whofe mouth it was fpoken^or by whofc hand it
was wrytten.
19 But forafmuch as we do fee , that the whole fumme of ourial-
uation, and all the partes thereof , are comprehended inChrift,we Afl 4.
rouft beware , that we do not draw away from him any parte thereof ' **
be it neuer fo litle.If we fceke for faluatioUjWe are taught by the very _
name of lefus, that it is in him . If wc fceke for any other eiftcs of ,1
DD ij. ' '••
Cap. 17, Of the knowledge of
thclpiri'-e, they arc to be found in his anoyntinge.' Ifwefcckcfot
leb.i 2. fticngth,it is in his dominion.'if we fcckc for cleannes,it is in his c6-
7. ception.Ifwe fceke for tender ktndnes,it fliewcth it fcife in his birth,
whereby he was made in all things hkc vnto vs, that he might Itarnc
3a. 5.1 3 fo forrow with vs:if we feeke for rcdemption,ic is in his paffion: if wc
feekc for abfohition,it is in his condemnation : if wc fceke for rclcafc
of the CMifcitis in his croflerif we fecke for fitisfadion, it is in his fa-
crificcrif wc fceke for cicanfing, it is in his bloude : if we fceke for rc-
concibation,it is in his going downe to the hels-.if we feeke for mor-
tiHcation of the flefli , it is in his buriall : if we feeke for newneiFe of
life , it IS in his rcfurredion : if wc feeke for immortality , it is in the
fame; if we feeke for the inheritance of the kingdom of heauen,it is in
his entrance into heauenrif we feeke for defenje, for affurcdneflrcjfor
plenty and ftorc of all good thinges,it is in his kingdome: if wc fceke
for a drcdleflV looking for the iudgement, it is in the power giucn to
him to iudge.Finally,fith the ireafures of all fortes of good things are
in him,lct vs draw thcnfe and from no where clfe, cucn till wc be full
wIrhall.For they v/hichjbeing not content with him alonc,3rc caried
hither and thither into diucrfe hopes , although they haue principall
regard to him,yct cue in this they are out of the right way, that they
turne any parte of their knowledge to any other where . Albeit fuch
diftruft can not creepe in , v/hcrc the aboundancc of his good giftes
hath once bin well knov/en.
The xvij. Chapter,
Thdt it U tritely and prtpcrlj fayd, that C^riji hath deferred
GodifM*onrandfaluati«nforvt,
THis queftion is alfo to be aflbyled for an addition . For there
are fome futile men after a wronge manner,which although
they confeffe that we obtaine faluation by Chrift,yctcan not
abide to heare the name of defending, by which they tbinkc
the grace of God to be obfcured : and fo they will haue Chrift to be
only the inltrumet orminifter,notthe author,guide,or Prince of life,
A^. J. OS Peter calleth him. In dcede I confcfle , that if a man will fet Chrift
»"• limply and by himfelfe againft the iudgement of God , then there
{halbe no roome for defcruinpe: beciufc there can not be founde in
Li.T. dc "i''"i 3ny worthines rhat may deferue the fauour ot God tBurjas Au-
prsd 2;uftinemofttruely wryteth, rhcmoftcleare light of predcftmation
f<nao- jjrn^ j^race is our Sauiour himfelfe , the man Chrift lefus, which hath
^^' obrnyncd fo to be, by the nature of man, which is in him,without a-
ny dcfcruingcs of woikes or of fayth goinge before,! befeecbe you
kc
Cjoq the Kedemcr. Lb.2 211
let me be anfwered , whereby that lame Man deierued to be taken
vp by the Word that is coetcrnall with the father into oncipcrfon,
and io to be the only begotten fonrie of God.Let therforc appcare in
our head the very fountaine of grace. From whom accoidingc to the
meafure of cucry one,itfloweth abroadc into all his mebeis By that
grace eucry one from the beginning of his faith is made a Chnftian,
by which that fame man fronf his beginnint;e was made Chrill . A- p^ {,(,.
gaine m an other place: there i<! no plainer example of predclhnation no per-
than the Mediatour himfelfe . For he that made of the feede of Da- Oucrat.
utd a man righteous that neuer fhoulde be vnrighteous , without any ^^?'^^^
defcruinge of his will goinge before , caen the fame he doth of vn-
righteous make them righteous that arc the members of that headc:
and fo forth as there folioweth.Therfore when we fpeakc o f Chriftj
defcruinge, wc do not fay that in him is the beginningof dcferuinge,
but we climbe vp to the ordinance of God , which is the firft caufe
thereof; becaufe God of his owne meercgood willappoynted him
Mediatour , to purchafe faluation for vs. And fo is the defei uingc of
Chrift vnfitiy fet againft the mercy of God. For it is a common rule,
that things orderly one vnder an other do not difai^ree. And iherfore
it may well Hand together,that«ians luftification is free by the meerc
mercy of God,and that there alfo the deferuingc of Chrift come be-
twene which is contained vndcr the mercy of God. But againft our
workes arc aptly fer,3s diredly contrary,both the free fauour of God,
& the obedience of Chrift,either of them in their degree.For Chrift
could not deferue any thinge but by the good pleafure of God, and
but becaufe he was appointed to this piirpofe^with his facrifice to ap-
pcafe the wrath of God, and with his obedience to put away our of-
fences.Finally in afumme : becaufe the defcruinge of Chrift hangcth
vpon the only grace of God, which apointed vs this mcane of falua-
tion,therefore as well the fame dcferuinge, as that grace,is fitly fet a-
gainft all tlie workes of men.
z This diftindion is gathered out of many places of the Scripture,
God fo loued the world,that he gaue his onely begotten fonnc, that loli. 3*
whofoeuer beleuethhim,fhallnotperifti.Wc (e howtheloucofGod »<•
holdcth the firft place,as the foueraignc caufc or original,& the folo-
wcth faith in Chrift , as the fecond or nerer caufc . If any man take
exception and fay, that Chrift is but the formall caufe, he doth more
diminilh his power than the wordes may bcarc . For if we obtaync
righteoufnelTc by fayth that rcfteth vpon him , then is the matter of
our faluation to be fought in him , which is in many places plainely
proucd.Noc that wc firft loucd him,buc he firft loued vs^and fcnt his ioh.4.
DO iij.
Cap.iy. Of the knowledge of
fonne to be theappcifingfor our (innes. In chele wordcs is clcrcly
fliewedjthnt God to the ende that nothing (hould wit hftand hislouc
toward vs,3ppointcd vs a meane to be reconciled in Chrift.And this
word Appealingejis of great weight : becaufe God after a certaine
vnfpeakeable manner, euen the fame time that he loaed vs,was alfo
angry with vs,vntill he was reconciled in Chijft. And lo this purpofc
[oh. 1 ferue all thofe faymgs: He is the ratisfa<ilion for our finncs. Againe;
It pleafed God by him to reconcile all things to himfelfejappeafing
j.t.ao hrmfelfe through the bloud of the croflc by him, &c. Againe , God
°^' ^ was in Chrift , reconcilingc the worlde to himfelfe , not imputinge
>*he.a. to men their finnes. Agame : He accepted vs in his beloued fonne.
>. Agsyne, That he might reconcile them both toGodirttoone man
)h,j,6 by thecrofle-Thereafonofthismyfteiie is to be fetched oat of the
firft chapter to the Ephelians,where Paule, after that he had taught
that we were chofen in Chrift,addeth therwithaihy we haue obray-
ned fsuour in him. Howe did God beginne to embrace with his fa-
uour them whom he loued before the makfnge of the woiU,but be-
caufe he vtiered hisloue when he was reconciled by the bloud of
Chrifl ? Fo'-fiihGodiithcfountayneofalhighteoulhefle, itmuft
ncedes be, that man folonge as he iva (^nner, haue God his enemy
and his lud^. Wherefore the beginning o^'his louc isrighteoufnes,
Q^ - fuchasisdelcribedby Paule.-Hemade hmithathaddonenoimne,
to be finne for vs , that we might be the ngi.teoufnefle of God in
, him. For he meancth, that we haue obtnynco free righteoufnefle by
y facriiice of Chnft, that we fliould pleafc God, which by nature arc
rhe cluldre of wrath, & by finne eftranqed from him. But this diftin-
dio is alfo meant fo oft as the grace of Chrift is ioyned to y loue of
God. Wherupon foIloweth,that he giueth vs of his owne that which
he hath purchaced : For othervvife it would not agree vvith him,thac
this praife is giuen him feuerally from his father , that it is his grace
and procedeth from him.
I But it is truelyand perfcdly gathered by many places of the
Scripture, that Chrift by his obedience hath purchaced vs fauour
with his fathrr . For this I take for a thingc confcffed , that if Chrift
hath fatisfied for our (innes , if he hath fuft'ered the punifliment due
vnto vs,if by his obedience he hath appeafed God, finally, if he be-
ing righteous, hath fuftred for the vnrighteouSjthen is faluation pur-
chafed for VS by his righteoufncfrc : which is as much in efted as to
0.5.11 <icferue it. But, as Paule witncfleth, we are reconciled and haue re-
ceiucd rcconciliarion by his death.But reconciliation hath no place,
but where there went offence before* Therefore the meaninge is:
that
ood tne Keaemer. 1.10.2 . 212
that Godjto whom we were hatcfuU by reafon of finnCjis by y death
of his Tonne appcafcd/o that he nnight be fliuorable vnto vs. And the
comparifon of contraries chat foUoweth^ lule after , is diligently to
be noted as by the tranfgrefTio of one man>many were made iinners: Ro.yjj
(o alfo by the obedience of one , many are made righteous. For the
meaning is thus : As by the finne of Adam wc were eftran ^ed from
God & ordained to dcftrudion/o by the obedience of Chiift we are
rcceiued into fauour as righteous. And the future time of the vcrbe
doth not exclude prefent righteoufnes, as appcareth by the proceife
of the text : For he had faid before , that the free gift was of many
(innes vnto iuftification.
4 But when we fay, that grace is purchafed vs by the defcruing of
ChriftjWe meane this, that we are cleanled by his bloud,and that his ,, j^i, ,
death was a fatisfadion for our finnes . His bloud cleanfcth vs from 5.
iinne. This bloud is it that is fijcd for rcmiffion of finne.if this be the Luc.az,
cftedof his bloud fhed , y finnes be not imputed vnto vs:it foloweth, *°'
that with that price the iudgcmcnt of God is fatisfied.To which pur-
pofe ferueth that faying of lohn the Baptift:Behold ylambc of God, lohn.i,
that taketh away the (inne of the world. For he (ettech in compari- ^^*
Con Chrift againft all the facrifices of the law , to teach that m him
only was fulfilled y which thofe figures (hewed. And we know,what
Mofes eche where fayth : Iniquity flialbe deanfed , finne fhalbe put
away and forgiuen. Finally we arc very well taught in the old figures,
what is the force andeffed of the death of Chrift. And this point the
Apoftle (etteth out in the Epiftle to the Hebrues , very fitly takinge Hc.^. 2:
this principle, that remiflio is not wrought without fheding of bloud,
Wherupon he gathereth,that Chrift for the abolishing of finne, ap-
peared once for all by his facrifice. Againerthat he was offered vp to
take away y finnes of many. And he had fayd before, that not by the
bloud of goatcs or of calues , but by his ownc blcudc he once en-
tred into the holy place,finding eternall redemption. Now when he
thus rcafoneth : If the bloud of a calfe do fandifici accordinge to the
cleannes oftlie fleftijthat much more cofciences are deanfed by the
bloud of Chrift from deade workcs : it eafily appeareth that the grace
of Chrift is too much diminiilied, vnles we graunt vnto his facrifice
the power of cleanfing,appeafinge and fatisfyingc-As a htle after he
addcth:This is the mediatour of the new teftament, that they which
are called)may receiuey promife of ctemall inheritance by meane of
death for y r ed^ption of finnes going before, which remained vnder
the law.Bur fpecially it is conuenient to wcy the relation which Paul
^cfcribctbjthac he became curfe for vs. &c. For it were fuperfluous, Ca.s.i 3
DD lU).
Cap.i 7. Of the knowledge of
yea and an abfurciity , that Chrift fhoulde be charged with curfe , but
for this entetjthat he paying ywhich other didowe,fliould purchacc
'Si. i 3. rightcoufnefl'e for them . Alio the tcttimony of Efaie is plaine that
the chaftifemcnt of our peace was laid vpon Chrift,& that we obtai-
ncd health by his ftripes.For if Cbrifthad not fatisficd for our finnes,
it could not haue bin faid,that he appeafed God by taking vpon him
the payne whereunto we were fubicd . Wherewith agreeth that
which folowcth in the fame place:For the finne of my people I haue
.Pc.2. (hiken him. Let vs alfo recite the expofitio of Peterjwhich Jhal leaue
14. nothinge doutfuU : that he did bcare our finne,vpon the tree. For he
faithjthat the burthen of damnation from which we were deliucred,
was laid vpon Chrift.
5 And the ApolUes do plainly pronouce,that he payed the pried
{o 24 o^'^^unfome to redeme vs from the giltinefle of death. Being iuftified
by his grace, through the redemption which is in Chrift,whom God
hathfet to be the propitiatory by faith which is in his blood. Paulc
c5mcndeth the grace of God in this point,becaufe he hath giuen the
price of redeption in the death of Chrift:& then he biddeth vs to flee
vnto his bloudjthat hauinge obtayned righteoufnefle, we may ftandc
boldly before the ludgement of God . And to the fame cffed is that
,Pct. I ^^y'"g of Pcter:that we are redeemed, not by gold and filuer,but by
g. the precious bloud of the vnfpotted Lambe.For the comparifon alfo
would not agree, vnles with that price fatisfadtion had bin made for
Cor.^ finnes : for which reafon Paulc fayth, that we are precioufly bought.
io. Alfo that other faying of his would not ftand together: There is one
mcdiatour that gauc himfelfc to be a rcdemprio,vnles the painc bad
bin caft vpon him which we had deferucdrTherfore the fame A poftlc
defineth,that the redemption in the bloud of Chrift is the forgiucnes
!ol.T. of finnes:as if he fhoulde haue rayd,y we are iuftified or acc^uited bc-
*• fore God, bccaufe that bloud anfwereth for fatisfa(ftion for vs.Wher
"^ ^•* with alfo agreeth the other place,that the hand wry ting which was a-
gainft vs,was cancelled vpon the croffe.For therein is meant the pay-
ment or recompenfc that acquireth vs from giltinefle , There is alfo
Sa.i.ai g''C2t weight in thefe wordes of Paulerlf we be iuftified by the works
of the lawjtlie Chrift died for nothing.For hereby we gather,that we
muft fctche from Chrift that which the la we woulde giue , if any
man can fulfill it : or ( which is all one) that we obtaync by the grace
of Chrift that, which God promifcd to our workes in the lawc
eu. 18. ^Ji^" he f3yd:He that doth thefe thinges,(hall liuc in them Which he
no lefft* plaincly confirmcth in his fermon made at Antioche , affir-
ip.i J. ming that by beleuing in Chrift wc arc iuftified firom all thofe things,
*• from
vjoc tne tveaemer. i^iD.2 . 215
fromwhichwccouldenoc bciuftiHcd'nthc laweof Mofcs. For if
the kepingof the lavvc be righteoufneife, who can denie that Chrift
defcrued tauour for vs, when raking that bus den vpon him, he fo re-
conciled vs to God,asif weour felucs had kept the law ?To the fame
purpofeferueth that which he afterwarde writethtothe Galatians: Gai.4.i
God fent his Sonne fubicd to the lawe,that he might redeem e thofe
that were vndcr the lawe. Forto whatendcferued that fubmiflion
of his , but that he purchaced to vs nghteoufncfle , takmg vpon him
to make good that which we were not able to pay ? Hereof commeth
that imputation of righteoufneflc without workes , whereof Paulc Rom. 4,
fpcakcth, bycaufctherighteoufnefle is reckencd to vs which was
founde in Chrift cnely. And iruely for no other caufc is the flelli of
Chrift called our meate,but becaufe we finde in him the fubftance of lohn 6,
life. And that power proccedeth from nothing els , but becaufe the 5 5»
Sonne of God was crucified, to be the price of our rig! teouQicfle.
As Parule faith, that he gaue vp hirnfelfe a facrifice of fweete fauour. Eph.j.j
And in an other place;He died for our (innes,he rofc againe for our ^o"***
iuft fication. Herevpon is gathcred,that not onely faluation is geuen ^ ^'
vs by Chrift , but alfo that for his fake his father is nowe fauourablc
vnto vs. For there is no doubte that that is perfedly fulfilled in him,
which God vnder a figure pronounceth by Efaic , fayin<z : I will do ft Efa. >j,
for mine owne fake, and for Dauid my feruances fike. Whereof the )5«
Apoftle is a right good vvitnefle, where he faith : Your finnes are for-
geoen you for his names fake.For though the name of Chrift be not i.Toh.i,
exprefled , yet lohn afier his accuftomcd maner (ignifieth him by J 3.
lhi5 pror.oimc He. In which knic alfo the Lorde pronounceth : As ^"hn.tf,
1 hue becaufe of my father,fo fhal ye alfo liue bycaufe of me. Where- 17', '
wirh agrecth that which Paulefaithjitisgeue you becaufe of Chrift, in, *'
not oncly to beleue in bim,but alfo to fufTcr for him.
6 But CO demaunde, whether Chrift deferued for himfelfc, ( as
Lombards, and the other fchoolemen do ) is no leflfc foolifh curiofi- Setetit
ticjthan it is a rafh determination when they affirmcit.For what nee- ^'o* 3-
6cd the Tonne of God to come downe to purchace any newe thing *^'^*'*'
for him fclfe ? And the Lord declaring his owne counfel],doth pift it
wholy out of doubte. For it is not faid > that the father prouided for
the commoditie of his fonne in his deferuinges,but that he deliuercd Rom- 1
him to death, and fpared him not,bccau{e he loued the worlde. And
the Prophetcs manners of fpcaking are to be noted, as,Achildeis Efa ^.
borne to vs. Againc.Reioyce thou daughter of Sion:bchold thy king ^«
commeth to thee. Alfo that confirmation of louc ftioulde be very ■
coldc which Paulc fctteth out.that Chnft fuffcred death for his cne- /?"' '
6.
Cap.i. Ut the maner how to recciuc
mics. For therevpon wc gather , thai he had no refped of hi'mfelfc:
*. 17. and that fame he plaincly aflirmeth in faying : I fanftifie my felfe for
them. For he that geueth away the frutc of his hohnefle vnto other,
doth thereby teftifie that he purchaceth nothing for himfelfe . And
truely this is moft worthily to be norcd,that Chrift,to geue him ftlfc
wholy to faue vs , did after a certaine maner forget him felfe. But to
this purpofe they doe wrongfully dravve this teftimonic of Paulc:
biLz. Therefore the father hath exalted him , and geuen him a name, &c.
For by what deferuinges couMe manobteme to be iudge of the
worlde , and the heade of the Angels , and to cnioy the foueraignc
dominion of God, and thatinhimfnoulde reft that fame maieftic,
the thoufandth parte wherof all the powers of men and Angels can
not reach vnto ? But the folution thereof is eafy and plaine,that Paulc
t»c«a4. dotjanotthereentrcateofthccaufe of exalting of Chrift, butonely
to (hewe the effed enfuyng thereof, that it might be for an example
to vs . And no other thmg is Tneante by that which is fpoken in an
other place , that it behoued that Chrift (houlde fufler , and To enter
into the gloric of his Father.
THE THIRD BOOKE
OF THE INSTITVTION OF
CHRISTIAN RELI GION, WHICH
intreateth of the maher how to receiuc
the grace of Chrift , and what profitcs do
grow vnto vs, and what efte6lcs
cnfuc thereof.
The firft Chapter.
That thofe thinges which arejpoken ofChrijl^ do profile vs by
fecret working of the holjGhojt.
?-^f^«^=?f^ Owe it is to be feene how thofe good thinges do
^>x//iEi_j.T f^Q^^ vnto vs, which the Father hath g^uen to
» his only begotten Sonne,not for his owne priuatc
(^ vfe,but to enriche them that were without them
apd needed them. And firft this is to be learned,
ithat fo long as Chrift is out of vs,and we be fcuc-
, /— 2-/^^ red from him , whatfoeuer he fuffered or did for
the faluacion of maiikmdc , is vnprotitablc and nothing auailcth for
V5,
1 ne grace ot v^niut. L.1D.3 . 214
vs. Therefore that he may cnterparren with vs thole thinges that he
hath rccciued of his Father, it behoueth that he become ours, and
^wellin vs. And for thatcaufe he is called oor heade,and the fit ft be- Ep^f.4»
gotten among many brethren : and on the other (ide it is faide , that ' ^*
we arc grafted into him, and did put on him. For ( as 1 haue before jo * '
faide) all that euer he pofl'efTeth belongeth nothmg to vs , vntill we Rom.w.
grow together into one with him. But alchogh it be true that we ob- "y*
tejnethisby faith : yet forafmuch as we fee that not all without dif- ^^^- i-
. fcrence do embrace this enterpartening of Chritt , which is offered
by the Gofpell, therefore very reafon teacheth vs ro climbe vp hier,
and to enquire of the fecretcfFedual working of the Spint,by which
it is brought to pafTe , that we enioy Chrift and all his good thinges,
I haue before entreated of the eternall godheade and Cilence of the
Spirite, at th js prefent let vs be content with this one fpecikll aincle,
that Chrift fo came in water and bloude that the Spirice fhould tc-
, ftdie of him,lcaft the faluation that he hath purchaccd,ili0'jld flippc
away from vs. For as there are allciied three witntlfes m heauen, the , t t, -
Father , the Wordc and tae Spirite , fo are there aJfo three in earth, y[
Water,Bloude and the Spirits. And not without caufe is the tcfiimo-
nie of the Spirite twife repetcdjWfich we fcele to he engrauen in our
heartes in fteede of a feale : whereby commeth to palfe , that it fea-
leth the waOiing and facnfice of Chrift. After which meaning Peter i.Pet.i,
alfo faith , that the faithful! are chofcn in fandiHcation of the fpirite*.
vnro obedience and fprinkeling of the bloude of Chrift. By which
words he telleth vs,fhat to the entcnt the ftieding of that holy hloud
fiioulde not become voide, <iur foules are cleanfcd with it by the fe-
crete watering of the holy Spirite . According wherevnto Paole alfo
fpeaking of cleanfing and iuftification, fayeth that we are made par-
takers of them both in the name of lefus Chrift and in the Spirite
of our God. Finally this is the fumme, that the holy Spirite is the
bonde wherewith Chrift effedually bindeth vs vnto him. For proofc
whereof alfo do fcrue all that we haue taught in thelaft booke be-
fore this, concerning his anointing.
X But that this , being a matter fpccially worthy to be knowen,
may be made more ccrtainely euident^wc muft holdc this in mindc,
that Chrift came furnifhed with the holy Spirite after a cercaine pe-
culiar maner,to the ende that he might feuer vs from the wor]de,and
gather vs together into the hope of an eternall inheritance. For this
caufe he is called the Spirite of findification , bccaufc he doth not
onely quicken and nomifli vs with that generall power which ap-^
pcareth at well in mankind? as in ail other Iiuinge creacures,but alfo
Cap.T ; Or the maner how to recciuc
is in vs the roote and ^ccdc of heauenly life . Therefore the Pro-
phets do principally commende the kingdomc of Chrift by this title
of prerogatiue, that then fliould tiorifli more plcntifull aboundancc
of the Spirite. And notable aboue all the reft is that place of loci:
feel 1 I" that day I will poure of my Spirzte vpon all flefh. For though the
i6. Prophet there feeme to reftraine the giftes of the Spirite to the of-
fice of prophecying, yet vnder a figure he meaneth, that God by the
cnlightning of his Spirite will make thofc his fcholers which before
•were vnflulifull and voide of all heauenly dodrine. Now forafniuch
as God the Father doth for his Sonnes fake gcue vs his holy Spirite,
and yet hath left with him the whole fulnefle thcrof,to the cnde that
he (houlde be a minifter and diftributerof hislibcrahtieiheisfome-
ome called the Spirite of the Father,and fometime the Spirite of the
flom. 8. Sonne. Ye are not(raieth Paule)in the flefh,but in the Spirite,for the
J. Spiriteof Goddwelleth in you. But jfanyhauenot the fpiriteof
Chriftjhe is not his. And heicvpon he putteth vs in hope or full le-
nuing, for that he which rnifed vp Chrift from the dcade, fliall quic-
- kenourmoitallbodiesbccaufeof his Spirite dwelling in vs. For it is
J J * * noab(urditie,thattotheF:ther be afcnbedthepraifeofhisownc
giftes, whereof he is the author : and yet that the fame be afcribf d to
Chrilt , with whome the giftes of the Spirite are lefte , that he may
, geuethemtothofethatbehis. Therefore he calleth aU them that
y ' * thitft. to come to him to diinke.And Paule tcacheth thnt the Spirite
Sphc 4. is dirtribured to cuery one, according to the meafure of the gifte of
f' Chrift. And it is to be knowen , that he is called the Spirite of Chrift,
not only in rcfpcd that the eternall Worde uf God is with the fame
Spirite ioyned with the Father, but alfo according to his perfonof
Mediator , becaufc if he had not had that power, he had come to v$
}. Cor. *" vaine. After which meaning he. is called the fecond Adam geuen
15.45. from heaucn,to be a quickning Spirite:whereby Paule comparcth the
(Ingularhfe that the fonne of Godbrcatheih into them that be his
that they may be all one with him , with the naturall life that is alfo
common to the reprobate. Likcwife where he wiflhcth to the faith-
full the fliuour of Chrift and the louc of God,he ioyncth withall the
common partaking of the Spirite , without which no man can taft
neither of the fatherly fauour of God , nor of the bountifulncfle of
loDfj, 5. Chnft. As alfo.he faith in an other place : The loue of God is poured
f* out into our heartes by the holy Spirite that is geuen vs.
J And here it ftialbe profitable to note,with what titles the Scrip-
ture fctteth out the holy Spirite , where it cntreateth of beginning
and whole reftormg of our falua^on, Firft he is called the Spirite of
adop*
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 215
a(Ioption, bccaule he is a witncflevnto vs of the free goodwill of
God , wherewith God the Father hath embraced vs in his beloucd
onely begotten Sonne } ihat he might be a father vnto vs , and doch
encourage vs to praie bouldely> yea and doth minifter vs wordes to ^
crie with out fearc Abba, Fathei:by the fame reafon he is called the ^ %^^
earned pledge J and feale of our inheritance, becaufe he fogeueth I'^i. '
life trom heauen ro vs wandring m theworIde,and being like to dead
men, that we may be affurcd that our foule is in fafegarde vnder the
faithful keping of God:for which caufe he is alfo called life,by reafon
for righteoufneflV. And forafmuch as by his fecret watering he ma- ^o"™ '•
keth vs frurefull to bring forth the buddcs of righteoufnen'e , he is '**"
oftentimes called water,as in Hfaie: Ail ye that thirft come to the wa- Efa. 5 $.
ters. Againc:! will poure out my fpirite vpon the thirftie,and floodes «.
vpon the drie lande: wherewith agreeth that faying of Chrift, which ^*^* '*4«
1 dideuennow allegcrlf any thirftjethim come to mcAlbeit^fome- \'^^^
time he is fo called , by reafon of his power to purge and clean fe, as 17,
in EzechicU where the Lord promifeth cleane waters wherewith he Eie j ^
will waHi his people from filthmefife . And forafmuch as he reftoreth * 5*
and norifheth into liuely quicknes, them vpon whome he hath pou-
red the liquore of his grace,he is therefore called by ihename of oilc
and anointemenc . Againe bycaufe in continually feething out and t.'oS.i.
burning vp the vices of our luft , he fetteth our heaites on fire with ^ "^T
the loue of God and zeale of godlines , he is alfo for this effed wor- ^ ^ ^'
th I ly called fire. Finally he is defcnbed vnto vs as afountaine, from lohn 4.
whtnfe do flowe vnto vs all heaucnly richcffe , or the handc of God, » 4.
wherewith he vfeth his power : bycaufe by the breath of his power ^^^
he fo breatheth diuine life into vs,that we are not now Itirred by our * *'
felues , but ruled by his ftirringand mouing : fo that if there be any
good thinges in vs,they be the frutes of his gracc:but our owne giftes
without him,be darkenjcfle of minde and peruerfnefl'e of harte. This
point is fet out plainely enough , that till our mindes be bcnte vpon
the holy Ghoft,Chrifl lyeth in a manor idle,by caufe we coldely efpic ^
him without vs , yea Si. farre away from vs. But we know that he pro-
fiteth none otht r but ihem whofe headc he is,and the firft begotten « .
among brethren, and them which haue put on Him.This conioining , I
oncIy maketh that, as concerning vs , he is come not vnprofitably Rom.1.
with the name of Sauiour. And for proofc hereof fcrueth that holy ^9-
mariage whereby we are madefleQi of his flem, and bones of his ^^^i*
bones, yea and all one with him. But by the Spirite onely be maketh Ephe«6(
him felfe one with vs : by the grace and power of the fame Spirite ja. * •-
wcare made hi* mcmbres , fo il-^it hecontcincch vs vnder him.
Cap.i. Of the maner how to rccciuc
and wc againc poflRfl'e him.
4 But forafmuch as faith is his principal! worke,to ir arc for the
inoft parte referred all thofe thinges , that we comrridnly finde fpo-
ken to expreife his fo^ce and workirig t becaufe he bringeth vs into
lohn.i. the Ughtof the Gofpell by nothing but by faith : as John B.»pt>l^c
I J. teacheth, thai this preiogatiue is geue to them the beleue m Chriil,
that they be the children of God which are borne not of flelh and
bloude, but of God: where ferting God againftfleih and bloude,
he affirmethit to bea fupernaturall gifte that they receiue Chrift
by fa]thj who otherwife llioiilde remaine fubied to their owne irrfi-
deluie.Like where vntais that aunfwere of Chnft:Fiefh and bloude
Mat.! 6. hath not reueled it to thee,but my Father which is in heauen.Thefc
* 7' thinges I do nowe but fhortly couche , bycaufe I haue already in-
tfeared of them at large. And like alfo is that faying or Paule, that
^ the Ephelians were fealed vp with the holy Spirite ofprotnifc. Fca:
Paule iheweth that lie IS an inwarde teacher, bywhofewoi king the
promilc of faluation pearcech into our mindes , which otherwife
Ihouldebut beate the aire or our eares. Likewife when he faith,that
s.Thcfr. thcThclTalonianswere chofen of God in the fanftification of the
»^ fpirire and beleuing of the truth : by which ioyning of them togc-
thefjhe bricfely admonillieth that faith it felfe procecdeth from no-
j.Tohn. thing elsbutfrom the holy foirit: which thing lohnfetteth out more
J. »4.& pIainely,fayinCT: We knowe that there abideth in vsofthe fpirire
J*. which he hath geuen vs. Againe, By this we knowe that we dwell
,„ " in him.and he in vs, bccaufc he hath geuen vs of his fpirite. There-
fore Chrift promifedto his Difcipiesthe Spiritc of truth which the
worldc can not receiue,that they might be able to receiue the hea-
ucnly wifcdome. And he alUgneth to the fame fpirite this propre of-
fice, to put them in minde of thofe thinges that he had taught them
by mouth . Becaufe in vaine iliouldc the light fliewe it felfe to the
blinde , vnlcfi'e the fame fpirite of vndeiftanding fhouldc open the
eyes of their mindc:fo as a man may rightly call the holy fpirite, the
kcye by which the treafurcs of the heauenly kingdomc are opened
vn:o v's:& may call his enlightning,the eyefight of our minde to fee.
xTor.j Xherefoic doth Saint Paule fo much commend theminifterie of the
*' fpii itc : bvcaufc teachers llioude crie without profiting, vnlcfiTc Chrift
himfclfe the inwarde maifter {lioulde drawe them with his fpirite
that arc geuen him by his Father . Therefore as we haue faide , that
pcrfe<ft faluation is founde in the pcrfon of Chrift.-fo that we may be
lulc, J. made partakers thereof, he doth baptize vs in the holy fpirite and
»^. ^tCj h-htnine vs into the faith of his Gofpcll,and fo ncwe begetting
vs.
The grace of Chrift, Lib,; . 216
YSjthat we may be newc creatures: and purging vs from vnholy filthi-
ncfle, doth dedicate vs to be holy temples to God.
The ij. Chapter.
of faith , vvhertin both idfet the definition of it , and the prt-
prtties that It hath f are declared.
BVt all thcfe thingcs (halbe eafie to vnderftand , when there
is fhewed a plaine definitio of fauh,that the readers may know
the force and nature thereof. But fiift it is conuenient to call
ro minde againe thcfe ihinges that haue bene already fpokcn,
thattith God doth appoint vs by his lawe what we ought to do,if we
fall in any point therof,the fame terrible iudgement of eternall death
that he pronounceth doth reft vpon vs. Againc, that forafmuch as ic
is not onely hearde bur altogether aboue our ftrengch and beyonde
all our power to fulHll the lawe, if we onely beholde our felues, and
weye what eftate is worthy for our deferuinges, there is no good
hope left , but we lie caft away from God vndcr eternall deftrudion.
Thirdly this hath been declaredjthat there is but one meane of dc^
liuerance to draw vs out of fo wretched calamitierwhcrein appeareth
Chrift the Redecmer,by whofe hande it pUafed the heauenly father,
hauing mercie vpon vs of his infinite goodneCfe and clemencie, to
fuccour vs/o that we with founde faith embrace this mercie,3nd with
conftant hope reft vpon it . But nowe it is conuenient for vs to weye
this, what maner of faith this ought to be, by which all they that are
adopted by God to be his children,do enter vpon the pofleilio of the
heauenly kingdome/orafmuch as it is certaine that not cuery opinio
nor yet euery perfwafion is fufficient to bring to palfc fo great a thing.
And with fo much the more care and ftudy mufl we looke about for,
and fearch out the natural propretie of faith,by how much the more
hurtfull at this day is the errour of many in this bchalfe . For a great
part of the worId,hearing the name of faithjconceiueih no hier thing,
but a certaine common alTent to the hiftorie of the Gofpel,Yea when
they difpute of faith in the fcholes,in barely callinge God the obic^
of faith, they do nothing but (as wc haue faide in an other place ) by
vaine fpeculation rather draw wretched.foules out of the rig! .t way,
than direft them to the true marke. For whereas God dwelleth in a i.Tim,
light that none canatteine to , itbehoueth of neceftitie that Chrift 6.16.
become meane betwene vs & it. For which caufe he callcth him fclfc
the light of the world:& in an other place,The wayithe Truth,& the '<>^n-**
Life, becaufeno man commeth to the father (which is thefountaine i^^ j.
of life) but by him;bccaufe he only knowcth tlic Father>& by liim the 4.
Cap.2. Of the manerhow to rccciuc
Luk.io. faithtull to whome it pleafeth him todirdofe him. According to thii
'*• reafon, Paule affirmeth, that he accompteth nothing excellent to be
fva^io* knowene , but Chrift : and in the xx. chapter of the Ades he faith,
, 7. that he preached faith in Chrift,&c. And in an other place he brin-
a.Ccr. geih in Chrift fpeaking after this mancr,I will fende thee among the
^•^ Gentiles, that they may receiiie forgcuenefle of finnes , and portion
among holy ones , by the faith which is in me . A»d Paule teftificth,
that tJie glorie of God is in his perfon vifible vnto vs:or ( which is all
one ineffed) that the enlightning of the knowledge of Gods glorie
fbinerh in his face. It is true in deede that faith hath refpedlonely to
the one God , but this alfo is to be added, that it acknowledge" hira
whome he hath fentjcuen lefus Chrift.Becaufe Godhimfclfc (liould
haue lyen fecret and hidden farre from vs, vnleffc the brighineffe of
Chrift did caft his beames vpon vs. For this entent the father left all
that he had with his onely begotten fonnc , cuen by the communi-
cating of good thinges with him toexprefife the true image of his
glorie. For as it is faidejthat we muft be drawcne by the fpirite, that
we may be ftirred to feeke Chrift, fo againe we ought to be admoni-
ftied, that the inuifiblc father is no where els to be fought but in this
T ibr.n. image. Of which matter Auguftme fpeaketh excellently well,which
<^e ciui. intr eating of the marke that faith fliould ftioote at,faith that wc muft
Dei. ca . j^^q^ whether we muft goe and which way : and then byandby after
** he gathereth that the fafcft way againft al erroures is he that is both
God and man . For it is God to whome we go , and man by whome
we go : and both thefc are founde no where but in Chrift . Neither
doth Paule when he fpcaketh'cf faith in God , mcane to ouerthrow
that which he fo ofte repeteth of faith that hath her whole ftay vpon
i.Pet. I ^|^j.j^:j. ^^j p^je^. jJqjI^ j^^^ fjjfly ioync them both together, faying
that by him we beleue in God.
z Therefore this euili,cucn as innumerable othcrjis to be impu-
ted to the Schoolemen , which haue liidden Chrift as it were with a
veilc drawene before himjto the beholding of whome vnleflc we be
dircdly bent, we (hall alway wander in many vncertaine mazes. But
belide diis that with their darke definition they do deface and in a
inaner bring to naught the whole force of faith > they haue forged a
deuife of vnexprefled faith , with which name they garnifhing their
moft grofle ignorance do with great hurte deceyue the filly people,
yea (tofaytruelyandpiainely asihethingisin deedc) this dcuifc
doth not oncly buric but viterly deftroy the true faith . Is this to be-
leue,to vnderftand nothing,fo that thou obediently fubmit thy fenfc
10 the Church ? Faith ftandcch not in ignorance but in knowledge,
and
The grace or Chnft. Lib.3. 217
and that not oncly of God, butof the willof God. For neither do
we obtcinefaluation by this that we cither arc ready to embrace for
t» ue whatfoeucr the Church appointcth , or that we do commit to it
all the office of fearchingand knowing:but when we acknowledge
God to be a merciful father ro v$ by the recociliatio made by Chnft,
and that Chrift is geuen vs vnto righteoufntfle , fandification , and
hfc. By this knowledge, I fay, not by fubmitting of our fenfe , wc at-
teme an entrie into the kingdome of hcauen. For when the Apoftlc Rom.io
faith, that with the hearte we bcleue to rightcoulhefle , and with the lo.
mouth confeffio is made to raju*tio,he (hewcth that it is not enough,
if a man vnexprefledly bcleue that which he vndcrfindeth notjnor
fceketh tolearne: but be rcquireth an exprcfTed acknowledging of
Gods goodneflc,in which confiftetli our righteoufneffe.
g In dcedc I denie not (fuch is the ignorance wherewith wc arc
compared) that there nowe be and hereafter Ihalbe m.^ny thinges
wrapped and hidden from vs , till hauing put of the burden of our
flelh we come neerer to the prcfcncc of God : in which very thinges
that be hidden from vs , nothing is more profitable than to fufpcnd
our iudgemenr,but toftay our minde in determined purpofe to kcpc
vnitie with the Church . But vnder this colour to intitle ienorauncc
tempered with humilitie by the name of faith, is agreatabfurditie.
For fauh lieth in knowledge of God and of Chrift not in reuerence john it
of the Church. And we fee what a maze they haue framed with this 3.
their hidden imphcationjthat any thing whatioeuer it be without any
choife, fo that it be thiuft in vnder title of the Church, is gread'.ly le-
cciued of the ignorant as it were an oracle, yeafomtime alfo moft
monftrous erroures. Which vnaduifedlightnefle of beliefe, whereas
it is a moft certame downefal to ruinc,is yet excufed by thcm,for that
it beleucth nothing determinatly, but with this condition adroyned.
If the faith of the Church be fuch . So do they faine , that truth i$
bolden in errour, light in blmdnefle,true knowledge in ignorauncc.
But becaufe we will not tarry long in confuting them , wc do oncly
warjje the readers to compare their dodrine with ours. For the very
pleanefte of the truth ic felfe will of itfelfe miniftcra confutation
ready enough . For this is not the queftion iimong them , whether
faith be yet wrapped with many remnauntes of ignorance , but they
definitiuely fay that they bcleue aright, which ftande amafcd in their
ignorance,yea & do flatter them felues thercin/o that they do agree
to the authoritie and iudgemcnt of the Church , concerning fhingcs
vnknowenc. As though the Scripture did not euery where teach,tjiat
with faith k ioyned knowledge,
EE
Cap,
2. Of the mancr how to receinc
4 But wc do grauntjthat fo long as wc wander fi om home in this
worldcjOur faith is not fully exprelTcdjnotonly becaufe many things
are yet hiddf from vSjbut becaufe being compafled with many miftes
of cnoures, we atteine not all thinges. For the higheft wifedomc of
the moft perfed is this,to profite more and proccede on further for-
warde with gentill willmgnefle tolearne.Thcrfore PauJe exhorteth
the faithfjll^if vpon any thing they differ one from an othcr,fo abide
for reuelation." And truely experience teacheth, that till we be vn-
clorhed of our flerti , we atteine to know lefle than were to be wif-
fliedjand daily in reading we light vpon many darke places which
do conuince vs of ignorance. And with this bridle God holdeth vs
in modcfty,afIigning to euery one a meafure of faith, that euenthc
verv beft teacher may be ready to learne. And notable examples of
this vnexprefled faith, we may marke in the Difciples of Chrift , be-
fore that they had obreined to be fully enlightned.We fe,how they
hardely tail.d the very firit introdudions, how they did fticke euen
in the fmalleft pointes,how they hanging at the mouth of their mai-
fter did not yet much proceede, yea when at the womens informa-
tion they ranne to the graue , the Refurredion of their maifter was
like a dreame vnto them . Sith Chrift did before beare witnefleof
their faith, we may not fay that they were viterly without faith : but
rather, if they had not ben perfwaded that Chrift fhould rife againe,
all care of htm wouldc haue periftied in them . For it was not fuper-
ftirion that did drawe the women to embalme with fpices the corpcs
of a de.'.d man of whome there was no hope of life:but although they
beleued his wordes whome they knew to be a fpcaker of trueth,yct
the ^rofnefte that ftiU pofletfed their mindcsfo wrapped rheir faith
indlrkene{re,thatthey wereinamaneramafcdatit. Wherevpon it
is faide, that they then at the laft heleued when they had by triail of
the thin^ it felfe proued the trueth of the wordes of Chriftrnot that
they then bcganne to belcue.but bycaufe thfc feede of hidden faith
which was as it were dead in their hartes,'thcn receiuing huclmefle,
did fpnnge vp. There was therefore a true faith in them, but an vn*
exprcfTed faith , becaufe they reucrently embraced Chrift for their
onely teacher . and then being taught of him, they determined that
he was the author of their faluation : Finally , thev beleued that he
came from heauen, by the grace of his father to gather his Difciplcf
to heauen. And we nt-ede not ro fcke any more familiar nroofe here*
of than 'his, thar in all thinges alway vnbelefe i* mingled with faith.
5 We may alio call it an vncxprefled faith, which yet in dccdc
is nothing but a preparation of faith . The Euangeliftcs do rchearfc
* thai
The grace of Chrlft. Lib.3. 218
that many beleued, whicii onely beinji rauifhed to admiration with
miraclesyproceded no further buc that Chrift was the Mcflias which
had bene promifed , albeit they rafted not fo much as any fclender
learning of the Gofpell. Such obedience which brought them in
rubic^h5 wiUingly to fubmit them felues to Chrift,bcarcch the name
of faith where it was in dede but rhe beginning of fajth.So the cour-
tier that beleued Ghriftes promire,c5cerning y healing of his Tonne,
when he came homc,a5 the Enangelift teftifiech, beleued againe:by- Iofin.4.
caufe he receiued as an oracle that which he hear de of the mouth of }•
Chrift, and then fubmitted him CcKq to his auchoritie to recejue his
dodiine Albeititis to be knovven,t:i?the was fo nadabieand rcndv
loleame, that yet in the tiift place the vrorde of bcicumg figmfieth
a particular belete: and in ihe fecond place mairech himof rhenum-
bre of the DifcipleSjthai piofetled to be the fcholers of Chnft AJikc
example doth lohn fet forth in the Samiiritanes, which fo beleued Iohn.4,
the womans rcpotte , that they ranne earneftly to Chnft, which yet
when they hadhearde him, faide thus : Now wc beleue not bycaulc
of thy report, but we haue hearde !iim , and we know that he is rhe
Sauiour of the worlde . Hereby appeareth that they which are nut
yet inftrufted in the firft jntrodudions , fo that they be difpofed to
obedience,are called faithfulhin deedc not proprely, but in this rc-
fped, that God of his tender kindeneiTe vouchefaueth to gf.uint fo
great honour to that godly affe<!;>ion,but this wilhnpneflc to learne,
with a defire to proceede further , diifereth farre from that groflc
ignorance , whenn they lie dull that are content with the vnexpref-
(ed faith, fuch as the Papiftes haue imagined. Forif Paule feuercly , xira
condemneth them which alway learning , yet neuer come 10 the j.7.
knowledge of trueth , how much more greuous reproche do thejr
^efcrue, that of purpofe ftudie to know nothing ?
6 This therefore is the true knowledge of Chrift,if wc receiuc
him fuch as he is offered of his Father,tlwtisto fay,clothed with his
Gofpell. For as he is appointed to be the marke of our faith, fowc
can not go the right way to him,but by the Gofpell going before to
guide vs. And truely there are opened to vs the treafures of grace,
which being (liut vp^Chrift Oioulde Iitle profire vs.So Paule ioyneth
faith an vnfeparable companion to dodrine, where hefairh: Yc haue
not Co learned Chnft , for yc haue bene tau^^ht what is the trueth m Ephc.4,
Chrift. Yet do I not fo rcftraine faith to t^e Gofpell, buc that i con- lo.
feffe that there hath bene fomuch taught by Mofcs & the Prophets,
as fufhfed to the edification of faith,but becaule there hath bene dc-
Luered in the Gofpell a fulkr opcamg of ^th , therefore it iS w«r-
E£ i;.
Cap.2. Of the maner how to rcceiuc
om.io thily called of Paule , the dodrine of faith. For which caufe alfo h«
faith in an other placc,that by the comming of faith the law i$Cakcn
away, meaning by this word faith, the new and vnaccuftomed maner
of teaching, wherby Chrift (ince he appeared our fcholemafterjhath
more plainely fet forth the mercy of his father , and more ccrtainely
tcftified of our faluation . Albeit it {halbe the more eafie and more
conuenient ordre , if we defcend by degrees from the generaltie to
the fpecialtie. Firft we muft be put m mjnde that there is a generall
relation of faith to the worde,and that faith can no more be feuercd
from the worde , than the funnebeames from the funne from whom
5fa. 5 5. they procede.Therefore in Efaie God crieth out:Hearc me and yoiJr
5- foule fhall liue. And that the fame is the fountaine of faith , lohn
[qH. lo. ^g^gfj^ i^ jj^gfg wordes-.Thefe thinges are written that ye may bc-
leue. And the Prophet meaning to exhorte the people tobeleefe,
?fa. 9S- ^^i^^^ This day if ye fhall heare his voice. And to hearc is common-
i. ly taken for to Beleue . Moreouer , God doth not without caufe in
Efaie fct this marke of differece betwcne the children of the Church
and ftraungersjthat he will inftrud them aU,that they may be taught
of Urn. For if it were a benefit vniuerfall to all,why (houlde he dircd
his wordes to a fewe ? Wherewith agreeth this that the Euangeliftcs
do commonly vfe the wordes Faithfull, and Difciples, asfeuerall
Ad. <?. wordes exprefllng one thing,and fpecially Luke very oft in the Ades
uand.^. Qf (hg Apoftles. Yea and he ftretcheth that name euen to a woman
and.26. .^^ ^^^ ^.^j,j^ chapiter of the Ades . Wherefore if faith do fwerue
26. and neuer fo liile from this markcjto which it ought to be diredly leuel-
and. 1 3. ledjit kepeth not her own naturCjbut becometh an vncertaine light-
and.i 4. neffe of beliefe and wandring errour of mindc. The fame Worde is
the foundation wherewith faith is vpholden and fufteined , from
which if it fwaruejitfallethdowne.Therefore take away the Worde,
and then there (hall remaine no faith. We do not here difpute whe-
ther the minifterie of man be necelfarieto fowe the word of God
that faith may be conceiued therby,which queftion we wil els where
intreaie ofbut we fay that the worde it felfe, howefoeuer it be con-
ucied to vs, is like a mirrour when faith may beholde God.Whcther
God doth therein vfe the fei uice of man , or worke it by his owne
only power,yct he doth alway fhew him felfe by his worde to thofe,
Ro.i. 5. whome his will is to drawc vnto him : whercvpon Paule defineth
faith to be an obedience that is geuen to the Gofpell. Rom. i. And in
p. ,• an other place he praifeth the obedience of faith in the Philippians,
j_^ * ' For this is not the onely puipofe in th e vnderflanding of faith , that
we knowc that there is a God,but this alib,yea this chiefely, that we
_ - vnder-
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 2ip
vnderftand what will he beareth towarde vs . For it not fo much be-
houeth vs to knowe what he is in himfelfe, but what a one he vvill be
to vs.Nowe therefore wc arc come to this point,that faith is a know-
ledge of the will of God, perceyued by his worde . Andthe foun-
dation hereof is a for econcciued perfuafion ofthetruthe of God.
Of the aflurednclTe whereof fo long as thy minde fhall difpute with
it felfc, the worde (hall be but of doubtfull and weake credit , yea ra-
ther no credit at all . But alfo it fufficeth not to beleue that God is a
true fpcaker, which can neither deceiuc nor lie, vnleffe thou further
holde this for vndoubtcdly determined, that whatibeucr procedech
firom him,is the facred and inuiolable truthe.
7 But becaufe not at euery worde of God mans heartc is raifed
Tp to faith , we muft yet further fcarch what this faith in the worde
hath proprely rcfped vmo.lt was the faying of God to Adam:Thou Gene.i
{halt die the death. It was the fay ing of God to Cain : The bloude ^ 7- ^^
of thy brother crieth to me out of the earth . Yet thefe are fuch fay- ^'^^'
inges as of them felues can do nothing but (hake faith, fo much lefle
are they able to ftabliih faith.We deny not in the meane feafon that
it is the office of faith to agree to the truthe of God, howeofte
fbeuer , what foeuer, and in what forte foeuer it fpeaketh : but nowe
our queftion is onely , what faith findeih in the worde of the Lordc
to leane and refl vpon . When our confcience beholdeth onely in-
dignation and vengeance, howecan it but tremble and quake for
feare? And howe fhoulde it but flee God,ofwhome it is afraidc?
But faith ought to fceke God, and not to flee from him . It is plainc
therefore , that we haue not yet a full definition of faith , bycaufe it
is not to be accompted for faith to knowe the will of God, of what
forte fo cuer it be . Butwhatif in the place of will, whereof many
times the meflage is forrowefiill and the declaration dreadfull , wc
put kindeneife or mcrcie ? Truely fo wc ihall come nerer to the na-
ture of faith . For we are then allured to feeke God , after that we
haue learned that faluation is laicd vp in (lore with him for vs. Which
thing is confirmed vnto vs,whcn he declareth that he hath care and
loue of vs. Therefore there needeth a promife of grace, whereby he
may teftifie that he is our mercifuU father , for that other wife wc can
not approch vnto him , and vpon that alone the hearte of man may
fafely reft.For this reafon commonly in the Pfalmes thefe two things
Mercie and Truth do cleaue together, becaufe neither flioulde it any ^^^* ^
thing profite vs to know that God is true , vnlefle he did mercifully
allure vs vnto himrneither were it in our power to fmbracc his mcr- pfjj^j
cie I vnlefTe he did with his one mouth o^er it . I haue reported thy 20. '
EE iij.
Cap.2. Ofthcmancrhowtorcceiue
truth and thy faluation , I haue not hidden thy goodneflc and thy
truth. Thy goodnefleandthy truethkeepeme. In an other place.
KtA 6 '^^y Tsercie to the hcauens , thy trueth euen to the cloudes. Againc.
6. All the wayes of the Lord arc mercie and trueth,to them that keepe
Pfa 1 07 hrscouenant. Ayaine.His mercie is muliiphed vpon vs,andthe truth
pUi 38 <5f the Lorde abidethforeuef.Againe.I vvjlllmge to thy name vpon
thy mercie and trueth . I omit that which is in the Prophetes to the
fame meanma;, that God is me-rcifuU and faith&ill'in his promifes.
For we fiisll raihcly determine that God is mercifuil vnto vs , vnlelTc
him leife do teftiHe of him felfe and preuenc vs with his calling.leafte
his wdl Oiou'.de be doubccfuU and vnknowen . But we haue already
feenc , that Chriitis the onely pledge of his loue , without vvhomc
an euery fide appeare the tokens of hatred and wrath. Nowe foraf-
much as the knowledge of Gods goodncfle fliall not much preuaile,
vnleire he make vMareft in it , therefore fuch an vnderftanding is to
be baniihcd as is mingled with doubtin'^.,and doth not foundly agree
in it felte, but as it were , difputeth with it felfe . But mans wit, as it
isblmde and darkened, is farref^omatreining and climbing vpto
perceiue the very wdl of God rand alio the hearte of man, as it wa-
uereth with pcrpetuall doubling , is fan e from rcfting aflfured in that
perfuaiion. Thei fore it behoueth both that our wit be Jightned,and
our hearte flrengtheried by fome other meane , that the worde of
God may be of full credit with vs. Nowe we fnall haue a perfed dc*
fcnition of faith, if wc fay , that it is a ftedfaft and affured knowledge
of Gods kmdnefTe toward vs>which being grounded vpon the trueth
of the free promife in Chrifl,is both reuelcd to our mindes,and fea-
led in our hcartes by the holy Ghoft.
8 But befoi e I precede my further , it flialbe neceflarle , that I
make fome preambles to diffolue ccrtaine doubtes that oiherwifc
might make fome ftoppe to the readers. And fiifl I muft confute that
diftindion that flicth about m the fcholes,betwcne faith formed and
vnformed. For they imagine that fuch as are touched with no feare
of God,with no feehng of godlincfl"e,do beleuc all that is neccflfaric
to faluation. As though the holy Ghoft in lightening our heartcs vn-
to faith , were not a witncfl'e to vs of our adoption . And yet pre-
fumptuoufly , when all the Scripture cricth outagainft it , they geuc
the name of faith to fuch perfwai^on voidc of the feare of God.
Wc nccde to ftriue no further with their definition.but fimply to re-
hear(c the nature of faith, fuch as it is declared by the worde of God.
Whereby fhall plaincly appeare howc vnfkilfully and foolifhiy they
rather make a noifc than fpeake of it . 1 haue alrcadic touched
parte.
The grace of Chriir. Lib.3. 220
parte , the reft I will adde hereafter as place fliall ferue . A t this pre-
fent I fay , that there can not be imagined a greater abfurditic , than
this inucntion of thcires.They wil haue faith to be an afllnc,wherc-
by euery defpifer of God may receiue that which is vttcred out o£
the Scripture. But firft they fhoulde haue feene whether euery man
of his owne power do bring faith to him felfe, or whether the holy
Ghoft be by it a witnefle of adoption , Therefore they do childifh-
ly plaie the fooles, in demaunding, whether faith, which qualstie ad-
deth doth fourme , be the fame faith or an other and a newe faithe.
Whereby appeareth certainly ,that in fo babhng they neuer thouglie
of the lingular gifte of the holy Ghoft . For the beginning of bele-
uing doth already conteine in it the reconciliation, whereby man
approcheth to God. But if they did weye that faying of Paule: Rom.io
With the hearte isbcleuedtorighteoufneire, theywoulde cefi'eto lo.
faine that fame colde quaUtie . If wc haddc but diis one reafon , it.
fliouldc be fufficient to ende this contention: that the very fame af-
fent(as I haue already touched^and will againe more largely repete)
is rather of the hearte than of the braine , rather of aftedion than of
vnderftanding. For which eaufe it is called the obedience of faith, Rom. u
which is fuch as the Lorde preferreth no kinde of obedience aboue $•
it : and that worthily , forafmuch as nothing is more precious to.
him than his truthc , which as lohn the Baptift witneflfeih , the be- lohn. j.
leuers doe as it were fubfcribe and feale vnto . Sithe the matter is * 5«
not doubtefull we doe in one worde dcterminately faie , that they
fpcake fondely when they faie that faithe is fourmed by adding of
godly affedion vnto afTent: whereas aflent it felfe, at leaft fuch af-
fent as is declared in the Scriptures, confifteth of godly affedion.
But yet there is an other plainer argument that offereth it felfe
to be alleged . For whereas faith embraceth Chrift as he is offe-
red vs of the Father: andCh|;ift is offered not onely for rightc-
oufnefTe , forgeuenefTe of (innes and peace , but alfo for fandifica-
tion , and a fountaine of liuing water : without double no man can
cuer truely knowe him, vnleffe he doe therewithall receiue the fan-
ditkation of the Spirite . Or , if any man delirc to haue it more
plainely fpoken, Faithe confifteth in the knowledge of Chrift. And
Chrift can not be knowene , but with fandification of his Spirite :
therefore it followeth , that faith can by no mcane be fcuered from
godly affedion.
9 Whereas they are wonte to laie this againft vs , that Paulc ,. Cor,
faieth ; If a man haue all faith, fo thai he rcmoue mountaincs : if he 12.10.
haue not charitie , he is nothing ; whereby ihey wouldc dcformc
££ iiij.
Cap.2. Of the mancr how to recciuc
faith, in fpoyling it of charitie : ihey conlider not what the Apoftle
in th.it place meaneth by faith . For when in the chapiter next be-
fore it, he had fpoken of the dmerfe giftes of the holy Ghoftjaraong
the which he had reckened the diuerle kindes of languages , power
and prophecie , and had exhorted the Corinthians to follow the btft
of thefe giftes , that is to fay , fuch giftes whereby more profit and
comodiue might come to the whole dotly of the Church:he ftreight-
way faide further , tliat he woi»lde lliewc them yet a more excellent
way.That all fuch gjftcs>how excellent foeuer they be of them felues^
yet are nothing to be eftecmcd,vnlefl"e they ferue charitie. For they
were geuen to the edifying of the Chuich , and vnlefTe ihey be ap-
plied there vnto, they loi'e their grace. For pioofe of this he particu-
larly re herfeth them , repeting the felfe fame giftes that he h;?d fpo-
ken of before, but in other names. And he vleth the wordes Powers
anxl Faith, for all one thing, that is for the power to do miracles. Sith
therefore this , whether ye call it power or faith , is a particular giFtc
of God , which euery vngodly man may both haue and abufe , as the
gifce of tongues,as prophecie and other giftes of grace : it is no mar-
uell if it be feuered from charitie. Butalltheerrour of thefe men
ft?.ndech in th.s , that where this worde Faith , hath dmerfe (i^nifi-
cationsj they not confidering the diuerlitie of the thing iignified,
difpute as though it were taken for oncthingein all places alike.
The place of fames which they allege for maintainanccof the fame
errour, fball be els where difcufled . But although forte^^thingcf
fake , when we meanc to fhewe what manner or knowcl d^e of
God there is in the wicked , we graunt that there are diuci fe ioites
of faithe: yet wc acknowledge and fpeake of but one faithe of
the godly , as the Scripture teacheth . Many in deede doe bclerc
that there is a God, thcythinke that the Hi^ione of the Golpell
and other paries of the Scripture are true ( as common'y we are
wonte to iudge of fuch thinges , as either are reported bem?^, done
long ago, or fuch as we our felues haue bene prefcnte at and fecne.)
There be alfo fomethat goe further, for both: they beleeue the
worde of God tobeamofteafiuredoracle, and they do not alto^
gether dcfpife his commaundementes , and they fomewhat after a
forte are moued with his threatemnges and promifes . It is in deede
teftificd that fuch haue faith : but that is fpoken out by abufe, by-
caufe they do not with open vngodlinefle fight againft the worde
of God, or refufe or defpife it : but rather prctende a ccriaine (hew
of obedience.
lo But this image or fhadowe of faith > as it is of no value , To
is It
The grace otChrilt. Lib.3. 221
is it not worthy of the name of faith. From the found trueth wher-
of how farre it difFereth , although it (hall be hereafter more largely
entreated , yet there is no caufe to the contrary , why it flioulde not
now be touched by the way. It is fayd that Simon Magus bcleued, Aft.S.
which yet v/ithinahtlc after bewraied hisowne vnbeiiefc.And wher- i j.Sc j
as it IS faid that he beleucd, we do not vnderftand it as fome dojthat
he fayned a behefe when he had none in his heart : but we rather
thinkc that being ouercomc with the maiefty of the Gofpelljhe had
a ccrtaine faith fuch as it was , and fo acknowledged Chrift to be the
author of life and faluabon , that he wiUingly profcffed himfelfe to
be one of his. After the fame manner it is faid in the Gofpcl of Luke, Luk.g.
that they beleue for a time , in whom the feede of the word is cho- & ^3.
ked vp before it bring foorth frute, or before it take any roote at all,
it byandby withereth away and periflieth .* wedout not that fuch
dclited with a certaine taft of the word do greedily rcceiue it,and be-
ginne to feele the diuinc force of irrfo farre that with deceitfial co»n-
terfaiting of fayth, they beguile notonely other mens eyes, but alfo
their ownc mindes. For they perfwade themfelues , that that reue-
rence which they (hew to the word of God , is moft true godlineife,
becaufe they thinke that there is no vngodlynelTe but manifeft and
confcffed reproch or contempt of his word. But what manner of af-
fenr foeuer that bc,it pearceth not to the very hart to remainc there
ft sbli(hed:& though fomtimc it fcmcth to haue takeroot;es,yettho(c
are not liuely rootes. The heart of man hath fo many fecret corners
of vanity, is full of fo many hiding holes of lying,is couered with fo
guilcfull hypocri(ie,that it oft decciueth himfelfe. But let them that
gioricin fuch fhadowes of faith vnderftandcjthat therein they are no
better than the Dcuill. But that fii It forte of men aie farre worfe j^^ j^
than the Deuill , which do fenfeleflely heare and vnderftande rhofc i^,
things* for knowledge whereof the Deuils do tremble . And the o-
ther are in this point egall with the Deuiil , that the fcclinge fuch a$
it is wherewith they are touched , turneth onely to terrour and dtC^
courage mcnt.
If 1 knowe that fome thinke it hard :, that we aflignc fayth to
the reprobate , w4iereas Paule affirmeth faith to be the fnite of elc- .
^ion. Which dout yet is ealily difToluedrfor though none receiue the *' *
light of faith,nor do trucly feele the effedual working of the Gofpej,
but they that are foreonlained to faluation ; yet experience (heweth
that the reprobate are fometimc moued with the fame feelinse that
the cle6t are,fo that in their owne iudgement they nothing differ fro
the cled.Whcreforc it is no abfurdity , that the Apoftlc afcribeth 10
Cap. 2. Of the maner how to rccciue
them the taft of the heauenly gjftes , that Chrift afcribeth to them a
faith for a time : not that they foundely perceaue the fpirituall force
of grace and aiTurcd hght of faith : but becaufe the Lord,the more to
ccdemne them and make them inexcufable, conueyeth himfelfe mto
their mindes fo farre foorth , as his goodneife may be tafted without
thcfpiritcof adoption.Ifany obiedjthat then there remayneth no-
thing more to the faithfull whereby to proue certainely their adop-
tion:! anfwere that though there be a great hkenefTe and affinity be-
iwene the ele(fl of God,and them that are endued with a falling faith
for a time, yet there hueih in the eled only that affiance which Paul
fpeaketli of,that they crie with full mouth, Abba, Father. Therefore
as God doth regenerate onely the eled with incorruptible feede for
cucr,fo that the fcede of life planted in their hearts neuer perifheth:
(o foundly doth he fcale in them the grace of his adoptio, that it may
be ftable & fure. But this wiriiftandeth not but that that other infe-
riour working of the Spirite may haue his coUrfe,euen in the repro-
bate. In the meane fcafon the faithful are taught,carefully & humbly
to examine themtelucs,leaft m fteade of aflurednes of faith,do creepe
in careleife confidece of the flcfli.Befide that, the reprobate do neuer
f onceiue but a confufed feelmge of grace , fo that they rather take
hoide of the fhadow than of the founds body , becaufe the holy Spi-
rite doth properly fealc ihc" remiflion of Cmncs in the eled onely , fo
that they apply it by fpeciall finth to their vfe.Bui yet it is truely (aid,
that the reprobate beleue God to be mcrcifuU vntothem , becaufe
they receiuc the gift of reconciliation , although confufedly and not
plaincly enough : not that they are partakers of the fclfe fame fay th
or regeneration wich the children of God,but becaufe they feeme to
haue as well as they , the fame beginning of faith , vnder a cloke of
Hypocnfie. And 1 denie not , that God doth fo farre giue light vn^
to theyr mindes, that they acknowledge his grace, but he maketh
that fame feelingc fo different from the peculiar teftimonic which he
giueth to his eled, that they neuer come to the founde effed and
fruition thereof. For he doth not therefore fhe we himfelfe mer*
cifuU vnto them , for that he hauinge truely deliucred them from
death > doth receiue them to his fauegarde, but onely he difclo-
feth to them a prefentmercye. But he vouchcfaueth to graunt to
the onely eled the liuely rootc of fayth , Co that they continue to
the cnde . So is that obiedion aunfwere<iv if God do truely (hewc
his grace, that the fame remayneth perpetually ftabUfhed , for
that there is no caufeto the contrarie,but that God may enhghten
feme with a pre(em feelingc of his grace , which afterwarde vani-
fheth
The grace ot Chrilt. Lib.3. 22a
fticih away.
iz Alfo though faith be a knowledge of Gods kindenes toward
VS,andanairuredperfua(7onofthe rructh thereof: yec itisnomar-
uell that the feelinge of Godsloue in temporaj.l tbinges doth vanifh
away:which although it haue an affinity with faithjyct doth it much
differ from faith . I graunt , the will of God is vfjchaungeable, and
thetructh thereof doth aiway ftedfaftly agree With itfelfc, but I
deny that the reprobate do proceede fo farrcas to atfaine vnto that
(ecretc reuelation » which the Scripture fayth to belofige to the e-
Icd onely . Therefore I deny that they do either conceiue the will
of God as it is vjichaungeable , or do (ledfaftly embrace the tructh
thereof, becaufe ihey abide in a feeling that vanifheth away : Like
as a tree that is not planted deepe enough to take liuely rootes , in
procefle of time waxeth drie , although for a fewe yeares it bring-
cth foorth not onely bioflbmes and leaucs , but alfo frure . Finally,
as by the fall of the hrft man , the Image of God might hauc bccnc
blotted out of his minde, andfoulc, foitis nomaruell, if God do
fhine vpon the reprobate with certaine beames of his grace , which
afterward he fuftereth to be quenched . And there is no caufe to the
conrary,but that he may lightly ouer wafli fome,and throughly foke
other fome with the knowledge of his GofpeU.This is in the meanc
time to hi holden for ti ueth,that how fmali and weake foeucr faith
be in the eled,yet becaufe it is to them a fure picadge of the Spirite
of God , and a feale of their adoption, the printe thereof can ncucf
be blotted out of their heartes : as for the reprobate , that they arc
ouerfpred with fuch a light as afterwarde commeth to noui^ht . And
yet the Spirite is not deceittfuU , becaufe he geueth not life to
the feede that hecafteth in their heartes, to make it abide alwayes
incoi ruptible , as he doch in the elcd . I go yet further , for whcre-aj
itiscuident by the teachingcof the Scripture and by dayeiy experi-
ence , tha£ the reprobate are fometime touched with the feehnge of
Gods grace , it murt necdes be that there is raifed in their heartes a
certaine difirc of mutuail louc. So for a time there liued in Saul a
godly aflf dion toloue God,by whom he knew himfelfe to be father-
ly handelcd , and therefore was delited with a certaine fweeteneife of
his goodnefl'e . But as the perfuafion of the fatherly loue of God is
not faft rooted in the reprobate, fo do they not foundely loue him a-
gayne as his children, but are led with a certayne affedion like hi-
red feruauntes. For to Chrift onely was that Spirite of loue giucn,to
jhis ende , that he fhoulde poure it into his members . And truely
|hat faying of Paule cxtendeth no further, but to the eledonly:The Ro, 5. j,
Cap.2. Of the maner hov; to rcceiuc
loue ot God is poured abioade into our lieartes by the holy Spirite
that IS giuen vs,euen the fame loue that engendrcth the fame con-
fidence of calling vponliim,\vhich I haue before touched. As on the
contrary fide we fee God to be marueloufly angry with his children,
whom yet he ceffeth not to loue:not that in himfelfe he haicth the>
but becaufe his wil). is to make them afrayd with the feclinge of his
wrath^but to the <i;ntent to abate their pride of flefh,to (hake of their
droafinefle,an<i to moue them to repentance . And therefore all at
one time they conceiue him to be both angry with them or with
their finnes,and alfo mcrcifull vnto them : becaufe they not fayned *
ly do pray to appeafe his wrath , to whom yet they flee with quiete
aiTured truft . Hereby it appeareth that it is not true that fome do
counterfaitc a (hewe of faith , which yet do lacke the true faith, but
while they are caried with a fodayne violent motion of Zcale , they
deceiue themfelucs with falfe opinion , And it is no dout that flug-
cilbncfTefo poCfefleth them, that they do not well examine their
heart as they ought to hauc done . It is Ukely that they were fuch to
Iohn.» whom f aslohnwitneffeih J Chrift did not commit himfelfe when
a4' yet they beleued in himrbecaufe he knew them all,and knew what was
in man.If many did not fal from the common faith(I cal it common,
becaufe the faith that lafteth but a time hath a great likeneffc and
, _ affinity with the liuely and continuinge faith) Chnft would not hauc
fayd to his Difciples : Ifye abide in mywordc, then are ye truely
my DifcipIes, and ye fhall know the tructh, and the tructh fhall make
you free. For he fpeaketh to them that had embraced his doftrinej&
cxhortcth them to the encreafe of faith,that they fhouid not by their
owne fluggiihncfle quenche the light that is giuen them . Th:;reforc
Tit 1.1. doth Paul affirme,that faith pecuharly belongeth to the eledjdecla-
ring that many vanifh away,becaufe they haue not taken liuely roote.
Mat.i 5. Like as Chrift alfo faith in Matthew: euery tree y my father hath not
I J. planted, Ihalbe rooted vp. In other there is a grofler kinde of lyinge,
lac. 2. that are not afhamed to mocke both God and men. lames inueieth
againft y kind of men, that with deceitful pretenfe do wickedly abufc
t.Tim.i faith. Neither would Paule require of the children of God a faith vn-
3. fayned , but in refped that many do prefumptuoufly chalcnge vnto
themfclues that which they haue not , and with vaine coloured de-
I Tim ^^'^^ *^° beguile other or fometime themfelues. Therefore he com-
J «, * pareth a ^ood confcicncc to a cheft wherein fayth is kept , becaufe
many in falhnge from good confcience , hauc fuffered mipwrcckc of
their faith.
1 J Wc muft alfo remember the doutfull fignification of the word
fayth.
The grace of Chrift. Lb.3. 223
faith. For oftentimes faith fignificth the founde dodrinc of religion,
as in the place that we now alleaged , and in the fame Epiftlc where
Paule will hauc Deacons to holde faft the miftery of faith in a pure r.Tim. j
confcience. Againe,wherc he publifhcth the falbng away of ccnaine 9»
from the faith . But on the other fide he fay th that Timothee was
nouriihed vp with the wordes of faith . Againe, where he fayth that i.Tim,4
prophane vanities and oppofitions , falfcly named fcienccs , arc the i.& 6.
caufe that many departe from the faith : whom in an other place he ^'Tmi.*
calleth reprobate touchinge faith . As againe he chargeth Tituj,fay- 1^*^ ^•
ingjWarne them that they be founde in the faith.By foundeneife he Tit.i.ij
meaneth nothing elfebut pureneflc of dodrinc, whichis eafily cor- & 2.2.
rupted and brought out of kinde by the hghtnefle of men . Euen bc-
caufe in Chrift , whom faith poflcfTcth , are hidden all the treafures Col.2i)
of wifcdom and knowledge : therefore faith is worthily extended
to fignifie the whole fumme of heauenly doftrine, from which it can
not be feuered.Contrarywife fomtime it is reftrayned to fignifie fomc
particular obieA,as when Matthew fayth ,that Chrift faw the fnith of ^^
them that did let downe the man ficke of the palfey through the tiles
and Chrift himfelfe crieth out that he founde not in Ifraell fo great
faith as the Centurion brought.Butit is likely that the Centurion was j^ .
carneftly bent to the healing of his daughter,rhe care whereof occu- 10. * *
pied all his minde:yet bccaufe being contented with the onely aflent
and anfwerc of Chrift , he required not Chrifts bodily prefence,thcr-
fore in refped of this circumftancc his faith was fo much commen-
ded. And a litle here before we haue fhewed^that Paul taketh faith for uCou
the gift of working miracle$,which gift they haue that neither are re- 1 5. »o.
generate by the Spirit of God,nor do hartily worfhip him, Al(b in an
other place he fetteth faith fory dodrine whcrby we arc inftiaidcd in
faith. For where he wryteth tlur faith (hall be abohfhed , it is out of
queftion that that is meant by the miniftery of the Church, which at
this time is profitable for our weakencfiTe. In thcfe formes of fpeach
ftandeth a proportionall relation . But when the name of faith is vn-
properly remoued , to fignifie a faife proftflion , oralyingetitleof
faithjthat ftiould feemc to be as harde a fii^uratiuc abufe as when the
feare of God is feite for a corrupt and wrongfull manner of v/orfKip-
pinge, as when it is oftentimes faydin theholy Hiftory, that the
foraine nations which haddc bin tranfplantcdinto Samaria and the
places borderinge there about,feared the fayned Gods and the God
of Ifraell: which is as much , as to mingle heauen and earth together.
But now our queftion is , What is that faith which makcth the chil-
dren of God diifereiu from tlie vnbcleuers , by which wc c«ii vpoa
Cap.2 . Of the maner how to receiuc
God by the name of our Father , by which we pafie fr6m death to
life , and by which Chrift the eternall fahiation and hfe dVn^ellcth rn
vs.The force and nature thereof I ihinke I haue fhortly and plaine-
ly declared.
14 Now let vs againe go through all the partes of it,eucn ho thi
beginning which being diligently examined^(as I ihinke)tbere (hall
remaine nothing doutfull. When in defining fnith w e call it a know-
ledge>wc meane not therb^ a coprehcnding/uch as men vfe to hauc
ofthofe thinges that are fubicd tomans vndeiftandinge.Foritisfo
far aboue it,that mas wit muft go beyond & fuimoiit it felfc to come
vnto it,yea and when it is come vnto it , yet doth it not attayne that
which it feelethjbut while itis perfuaded of that which it conceiueth
not , it vnderftandeth more by the very alfuredneffe of perfuafion,
thanifit did with mansov/ne capacity throughly perceiue any thing
familiar to man. Therefore Paule iayth very well,where he caJleth
it to comprehende what is the length, bredthjdepth, & heighch,3n<i
to know the loue of Chnft that farre furmounteth knowledge . For
his meaningc was to fignifle ^ that the thinge which our niinde
conceiueth by faith, iseuery way intinite, and that thiskindeof
knowledge is farre hyer than all rnderrtandtnge . But yet becaufc
the Lord hath difdofed to his Saintes the fecrete of his will which
was hidden from ages and generations , therefore by good reafon
faith is in Scripture fometime called an acknowledginge : and lohn
calleih it a ccrtaine knowledge, where he teftifierhyt hat the faithfull
do certaynely know that they are the children of God. And vndou-
tcdly they know it afluredly : but rather by being confirmed by per-
fuafion of Gods trueth,thanby beinge informed by naturalldemon-
ftration. And this, alfo the wordes of Paule do decLre fayingcthat
while we dwell in the body,we are wandering abrode fi om the lord,
becaufe we waike by faith and not by fight ; whereby he Iheweth
that thofe thinges which we vnderftandeby faith, are yet abfent
from vs and are hidden from our fight. And hereupon we determine,
that the knowledge of faith ftandcth rather in certainty than in com-
prehending.
1 5 We further call it, a fure and ftedfalft knowledge , to exprcflc
thereby a more found conftancy of perfuafion.For as faith is not co-
tented with a doutful and rowling opinion, fo is it alfo not contented
with a darke and entangled vnderftanding:but requiretha full & fixed
a(ruredne(ft\jlich as men are wont to haue of things founde by expe-
rience andproued.For vnbeliereftickeihfofaft andis fodeepe roo-
ted m our heanesjand we are fo bent vnto it, that tliis whicli all men
confeffe
The grace of Ch rift. Lib.3. 224
cofcffe with their mouth to be true>y God is faithful, no ma is with-
out great contention perfuaded in his heart . Specially when he c6-
mcth to the proufe, then the waucringof allmen difclofcth the fault
that before was hidden. And not without caufe the Scripiturc with fo
notable titles of comendation maintaineth the authority of the word
of God , but endcuoureth to giuc remedy for the aforefayd difeafe,
that God may obtaine to be fully beleued of vs in his promifes. The
wordes of the Lord(fayth Dauid)are pure wordes,as the Silucr tried ^^^].i%
in a fornace of earthjfined fcuen times. Againe,Thc word of the Lord ^ ^*
fined is a fhieldctoallthat truftinhim . And Salomon confirmingc P«o.j«fc.
the rame,andin a manner in the fame wofdes, fayth : Euery word of ^
God is pure. But fith y whole 1 19. Plalme entrcateth only in a man-
ner vpon the fame , it were fupcrfluousto allcagcany moe places.
Trucly fo oft as God doth focomcnd his word vnto vs,hc doth ther-
in by the way reproche vs with our vnbelcuingnefTe : bccaufethat
commendation tendeth to no other end, but to rooce vp all pcrualc
douting? out of our hearts.Therc be alfo many which fo cocciuc the
mercy of God,that they take litlc comfort thcrof. For they be cucn
therewithal! pmched with amiferable carcfulneffe , while they dout
whether he will bemercifull to them orno, bccaufethey cnclofc
within to narrow boundcs the very fame mercifulncffejof which they
thinke themfelues , moil afluredly perfwadcd . For thus they thinke
with themfelues, that his mercy is in deede great and plentifull pou-
red out vpon manyjoffnng it fclfe and ready for all mcn:bui that ir is
not ccrtaine whether it will extende vnto themorno,or rather whe-
ther they (hall attaine vnto it or no . This thought when it ftaycth in
the middc race,is but a halfc. Therefore it doth not fo confirmc the
fpirit with aflured quietnes, as it doth trouble it with vnquietc dout.
fulncfTe.But there is a far other feeling of full aflurcdncffe , which in
the Scriptures is alway afligned ro faith , euen fuch a one as plaincif
felting before vs the goodnes of God,doth clearely put it out of dour.
And that can not be, butthatwemuftneedestruely feeleandprouc ^P^c-I*
in our felues the fwetenefle thereof And therefore the Apoftle out ***
offaithderiueth afTured confidence , and out of itagaineboldnefrc.
For thu5 he fayth,that by Chrift we h.iue boldnclTe, md an entrance
with confidence, whicli is through faith in hmi. B v which words true-
ly he fliewcth , that it is no right fayth , but when we are boidc with
quiet mindesto fliew our felues in tlie prcfcnce of God.VVhich hold-
neflfe procedcth not but of aflured confidence of Gods good will and
our faluation . Which is fo ttue, thai many time* this wordFaith.is
vfed for Confidence.
Cap.
. 2 . of the mancr how to rccciuc
16 But hereupon haiigeth rhechiefeftay of our faith, that vre
<!o not thinke the promiTcs of mercy which the Lord ofFreth to be
true only in other befide vs,& not at all in our felues:but rather that
in inwardly embracinge thcm,we make them our owne. From henfc
Ro. 5.1. proceedeththat confidence which the fame Pauic in an other place
callcth pedCt-jVnles fome had rather fay, that peace is deriued of it. It
is an aflurednes that maketh the cofcience quiete & chereful before
Godjwuhout which the confciece muft of neceffi'.y be vexed, & in
a maner torne in peeccs with troublefome trembling,vijlcfle perhaps
it do forget God and it felfe, and fo flomber a litle while. And I may
truely fay. For a hrlc while,for it doth not longe enioy that miferablc
forgetfulnes, but is with otte recourfe of the remembrance of Gods
iudgement iharply tormented. Briefely>there is none truely faithful!,
but he that being perfuaded with a founde aflurednelfe that God is
his mercifull and louing father, doth promife himTelfc all thmges v-
pon iruft of Gods goodneflerand none but he that truftsng vpon the
promifes of Gods good will toward him , conceiucth an vn*1outed
He. 5.1 3 iookinge for of faluation : as the ApolHe (heweth in thefc wordes : if
we keepefure totheende our confidence and gloryinge of hope.
For hereby he meanerh that none hopeth well in the Loide, but he
that with confidence glorieth that he is heire of the kingedome of
heaucn.Thcre is nonefl fay) faithful!, but he that leaning vpon the
affuredneffe of his owne faluation, doth confidently triumphe vpon
the Deuill and death , as we are taught by that notable concludinge
Rom. 8. fentcnce of Paule : I am perfuaded (faith he) that neither dcaih,nor
3*. life, nor Angels, nor principalties, nor powers, nor thinges prefent,
nor things to come,{halbe able to feparate vs from the loue ofGod,
wherewith he cmbraceth vs in Chrift lefu. And in like manner,thc
fame Apoftle thinketh , that the eyes ofour minde are by no other
mcanc well lightened , vnlcfTe we fee what is the hope of the eternal
Ephc I. inheritance to which we are called. And ech where his common ma-
18. ncr of teaching is fuch, that he declareth that no otherwife we do not
well comprehend the goodnefle of God , vnleflc we gather of it the
frute of great aflurednefl'e.
17 But ( fome man will fay ) the faithfuU do findc by experience a
firre other thing; within themfelues,which in recording the grace of
God toward them, are not onely tempted with vnquietencire,which
oftentimes chaunceih vnto them,but alfo are fometime fhaken with
moft oricuous tcrrours: fo great is the vehemency of temptations to
throw oowne their mindes : which thing fecmeth not fufficienily wel
to agree with tliat alTurcdneirc of faith. Therefore this dout muft be
anfwc-
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 225
anfwerecljif wc will hauc our aforefayd do(fb:ine to fta,od3ut truely,
when w€ teach e that fayth ought lo be certaine-and aflurcd , v/c do
•not imagine fuch a certainctic as is touched with no doutinge , nor
Cuch an aflurednefle as is aflayled with no carefulneite : but rather
we fay, that the faithfull haue a perpetuall ftnfe wiih their ownc
diftiuftfulincfTe . So farre be we from fettlmgetheir conlcicncesin
fuch a peafeable quietencfle, as may be mtcrruptcd with no troubles
at all. Yet on the other fide we fay, that in what forte foeuer they be
afflided,:hey do fjeueriall and dcparre from that affured confidence
which they haue concciuedof thcrKcrcyof God. The Scripture
iettcth forth no example of faiih more plaine, or more notable than
in Dauid » fpccially if a man beholde the whole continuall courfe of p^,, ^^
jhis life. But yet howe he was not aivray ofquiete minde, himfelfe 6 ^ 4j.j
dedareth by innumerable complainies , of which at this tin>e it HiaU
be fufficient to cboofe out a fewc . When he reproclierh his ownc
/bule with troublcfome motions , what is ir eife but that he is angry
with his owne ynbclcuingneiTc ? Why trcmbleft thou my foule(fayth
he)and why art thou difquietcd within me ? truft in God. And truely
that fame difcouragement was a plaync token of dcfttudion, euen as
if he thought himfelfe to be forfaken of God. And in an other place pf^
wcreadcalargcrcofeflion thcrofjwherehcfaith:! fhydinn.y oucr- »j.
throw,! am caft out from the fight of thy cies. Alfo in an other place
he difputeth with hinjfelfc in carefull and mifefable perpJcxny, yea &
quareleth of the very nature of God, fayingeiHath God forgotten to
haue mercy ? will he caft of forcuer? And yet Harder is that which
followeth : But I hauc fayd , To die is mine : charges are of the right pc, __
hande of the hieft.i?or,as indefpcarc he condenvncth himielfc to de- lo.
ftrudioPi,and not only confcflcth himfelfe to be tofled with douting,
but as if he were vanquiihed in battell,he leaueth nothing to himlelf,
bccaufe God hath fotiakcn bim,and hath turned to deftroy him, the
fame hande that was wont to be his helper. Wherefore not without
caufe he exhorteth his foule to returne to her quictenefTcjbecaufe he _ **'
had found by cxperience,that he was toffed amog troblelbme wanes.
And yet ( which is marucllous) in all thefe aflauhes , faith vpholdcth
the heartes of the godly, and is truely like vnto a Date tree to ende-
iiour and rife vpward againft all burdens , howe great foeuer they be:
as Dauid when he might fecme to be vtterly ouerwhclmcd , yet in
rebuking himfelfe , cclieth not to rife vp to God. And triicly he that
ftriuinge with his owne weakenclfe, reforteth to faith in his troubles,
is already in a manner conqqerour . Which may be gathered by this
Icntcncc and other UkcrWaitc fof the Lord,be ftfong^he ihal ftrcng- prai.ay
Cap.2. - Of the maner howtd receiue
then uhy h^aft'rwaice for the Lord.Hereprochethhimfelfe offl*afi>»
fulnes, & in repeating the fame twifCjCofeiTeth himfclfe to be fom-
' times fubiedto many troublefome motion?. And in the meane Jimc
he do:h not ortely become difpleal^dwith himfeife in thcfe'faultcj,
but carhellly endeuourcth to aniendemerit .• Truely ifwewitt more
nertly by gocjd e^anlirtation compare him with Acha2,thcre fhalbe
Efa.7. 5 foiinde great diffcrcrice.Efay was fentto bring remedy to the carefiiH
griefc of the wicked king and hipocrite,and i^ike vhto him in thefe
wordes;Be m fauegard and be quiete:feare not, &c. But what did A-
chaz^As it \vas before faydjtbat his heart was mouetiasjhe trees of
the woode are fhaken with winde,thbugh he hearde the promire,yet
he ceffed not to quake {orfeare.This therefore is the prdpre reward
& punilhmen: of vnbeliefe,fo totrcmblefor feare,thatiin terrtptati^
he turneth himfclfe away from God,that'dothiiot opeato hjmftlfe
the gate by faith.' Contrariwile tht faithfilill whom the weighty l)riti'
den of temptations maketh to ftoupcarid iii « itjaner oppreffethjd*
conftantly rife vp,although not witnout trouble and hardinefle. And
becaufe they know their ovvne we^keneffe, they pray with the Pro^
phec:Take no: the wordoftrueth afway frbffi my mouth continua't*
■ '^-^ ly.By which words we are taught,tharlbmtimechcy becomedflmmc
as though thtir faith'*were yttefly ouerihrowen , yet they faint not,
nor turnetheir bcickes,but procfede in-t^eir battel,& with praier do
encourage their flbuthfulneflc , leaft^by Buotinge tHcml^lues tlicy
illould grow TO vnfenfible dulneffe.-^ i/^ 531
i8 For the vhticrllandihg therof,it is'ncedefult to returne to that
diui(ion of the fiefh and the fpirite , whereof we made nientioti in an
oth er place , Which xfoth in this behalfe riioft clearely appeare . The
godly heartthcrert>refeclethadiuipon initfelfe, which is partely
dclited witih rw<tcneflfe by ackmiwtedgine of the goodncfle of God,
and partly grleu^d witih hitternefl'e by feetingcofhis owne miferie,
partly rciteth vpon the promife of the Gofpelljand partly trembleth
by reafon of the r^ftirrioriy of Itis owne wickedneffe:partly reioyfeth
with conccirting of hfcjand partly quaketh for feare of death.Which
rariation'corhnTeth by jmperfedion of fairhjforafmueh as wcneuer
"be in foepood tafe'in the courfe of this prefent life, as beinge healed
from a'ldifeafe of diftruftfulnefle to be altogether filled & poflcffed
Withfairh. HereupBn proceedethofe battels , when the diftruft-
fultics that abrdcth m the remnanrs of the ftefh,rifeth vp to afl'aile the
•faith that is inwardly conceiued.Butifin a faithfull minde aiTurednes
be mixedV/ith doatfirlnefTe , come we not then alway to this point,
that faith ftandcth not in a cer tainc and deare knoweledgc,butin a
'- ^* darkc
4J
The grace of Ch rift. Lib.3. 226
darke & doutfully entangled knowledge of Gods will toward vs?No,
not fo.For though wc be diuerfely dravven v/ith fundry thouphteSjVCt
are we not therfore byandby feuered from faith::hough we be vexed
with tolFing vp and downe of diftruftfuIaeiTe, yet are we not therfore
drowned in the bottomiefTe depth therof:and though we be fliakcn,
yet be we not thruft downe out of our place . For this is alway the
ende of this battell,t!K»t faith doih at length with wraiHing ouercome
thofc hard troubles wherewith when flie isi fo bcfieged , llie feemeih
to be in danger.
19 Let this be the fumme of all. So (bone as any drop of faith, be
it ncuer fo fmallj is poured mtoour heartes,we byandby beginns to
beholdc the face of God mildc and plearaunt , and Icmmg toward vs:
yet the fame wc fee from a firrc of, & farre diftant fronm vs,but with
fo fure fight, that we know we are not dcceiued.Fio thenfe forward*
howe much we profit ( as wc ought continually to profir ) as it were
by proceeding further, we come vnto fo much the nerer,& therfore
<ertainer beholding of him,& by very c6ntinuance he is made more
familiar vnto vj . So we fee, that the minde enlightened with the
knowledge of God,is firft holden wrapped in much ignorance^which
by litle and litle is wiped away . Yet the fame mindc is not fo hinde-
red by being ignorant of fomc ihings^or by dai kcly feing that which
ihe fecth,but that flie enioyetha clere knowledge of Gods wil tov/ard
her,which is the firft and principall point infaith.For as if a man be-
ing (hut vp in pri(bn,haue beames of the funne Hiinrngs in,{idelonge
at a narrowe window, or as it were but halfc glummeringe, he wan-
teth in dccde the free beholdinge of the funncyet he feeth with hii
eyes an vndoiiied bnghtncfTc thereof, and receiueth the vfe of it : fo
we being bounde with the fetters of an earthly body, howfocuer wc
be on eche fide {hadowed with riiuch darkenes,yet we are fuffioenc-
ly enlightened vnro perfed alTuredneffcjby the light of God,exten*
ding his beames of light vpo vs, though it be but a htlc^to (hew forth
his mercy.
20 Both thefe pointes the Apoftle very well tcacheth in diuer(e
places.Forwhen he layth,that weknow vnperfedly,andprophecie i.Cor.
vnpferfedly , and fee by a darke fpcafcinge as by a glalTe, he llieweth ' 3'**
how fclender a litle portion of the true godly wifedom is giuen vs in
this prcfcnt life. For though thofe words do not cxpreifely fhew that
our faith is vnperfeft fo longe as we grone vnder this burden of the
flefhjbut that it happeneth vntons by our owne imperfedion that wc
haue neede to be continually cxcrcifed in leai ning.yet he fecretly dc-
clarech chat chauhinge which is infinite, can not be comprch6nde4
'.: FF ij
Cap.2. Of the maner howto rcceiiic
by our fmall capacity , and narow compafle . And this Paulc rcpor-
leth of the whole church , but vmo euery one of vs > his owne dul-
nelfc is a hinderance and ftay that he can not come fo nere as were
to be wiihed . But how fure and vndecciueable a tail of it relfe>eucn
I. Cor. 3 3 fmall droppe of faith doth make vs fecle,thc fame A pottle fhcwcth
\i. in an other place , where he affirmcth , that by the Gofpell we be-
hold the glory of God with vncouered face,hajuing no vcile bctwene
vs and it, fo eftcdually that we be transformed into the fime image.
In fuch enranglemcntes of ignorance there muftncedes be v/rapped
toj^ethcr both much doutingeand fearefull trembling, fpecially for-
afmuch as our heart, by a certaine naturall inftind of it felfCjis encli-
ned to vnbeleuingnefle. Belide that, there be tentations which both
infinite in number,and diuerfe in kinde,do oftentimes with great fo-
dame violence aflaiievs. But fpecially our owne confcienceopprcf-
fed with heauy burden of hnnes lying vpon it, doth fomtime lament
and grone with it fclfc, and fometime accufeth it felfe : fometime fe-
cretely murmureth,and fometime is openly troubled.Whether ther-
fore aduerfities do Hiewe an apparance of the wrath of God , or the
confcience doth findein it felfe any proufc or matter of his wrath,
from thcnfe vnbeliefe doth take weapons and engines to vanquifhc
faith withall : which are alway dircded tothisen<le,that we thinking
God to be our aduerlarie and hatefully bent againft vs, rtioulde both
not hope for any helpe at his h3nde,& alio be afraid of him as of our
deadly enemy.
1 1 To beare thefe aflfaulteSjfaiih doth arme &fortifie her felfe with
the word of God. And when fuch a tentation alTaileth , that God is
our enemy, becaufe he is fharpe againft vs: faith on the other ilde an-
fwcrcthjthat cuen when he punilheth he is alfo merciful! becaufe his
challifcmcnt commeth rather of Iduc than of wrath. When faith is
ftriken with this thought that God is a reuenger of iniquities,ag3inft
•^ that ftroke he fctteth his pardon ready for all ofFenfes , fo oft as the
(inner re(orteth to the mercifulneffe of the Lorde. So a godly minde
howfoeuer it be in maruelous wifctofied and vexed, yet at length ri-
feth vp aboue all daungers,& neucr fuffereth the confidence of Godf
mercy to be plucked away from it: But rather whatfocuercontenfios
do trouble and wery it, intheende they turne to the aflurednefiTe of
this confidence And hereof this is a pronfe:that the holy ones, when
they thinke ihefelues moft of all prefTcd with the vengeance of God,
yet euen then do make their complajj|»tes to the fame God:and when
it feemeth that they fhall nor be heard at all, euen then neuertheleflc
they call vpon him. For to what purpofe were it,to make their raoanc
CO
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3 . 227
to him from whom they hoped for no comfort ? cruely they would
ncuer finde in their hcartes to call vpon him , vnlefle they beleued
th.-^t there were fome helpc at his hande prepared for them. So the Mat. 8.
DifcipleSjin whom Chrift blamcth their fmalnefTe offaithjComplai- 2;.
ned in dcede that they pcrifhed,but yet they called to him for help.
And when he rebukcth them for their fmall faith , yet he doth not
reicd them from the number of his,normaketh them of the nunjbcr
of the vnbeleuersjbut ftirrcth them to {hake of thatfault.Theieforc
we affirmc againe that which we hauc aboue fpokcn,that the roocc
of faith is neuer plucked out of a godly heart , but fticketh fb fall in
the bottome , that howfoeuer it be fliaken and feemc to bende chi$
way or that W3y,the light therof is fo neuer quenched or choked vp,
but that itlieth atleaft hidden vnder fome embers;and by this loktn
is plainely fhcwed 5 that the wordc whichisan vncorrup.ible fecde,
brmgcth forth frute like to it felfcjthe fpring whereof doth neuer wi-
ther & vtteily pcrifti.For whereas this is the extremett matter of dc-
fpcire to the holy ones^ to feele according to the coGdertaion of pre-
fent thingeSjthc hande of God bent to their deftrudion: yet lob af-
firmeth that his hope (hal proceeds fo farre,ihat though God do kill ° *'?*
him, yet he will not therfore celfe to truft in him. This is the trueth * ^
therefore : Vnbelicfe rcignet'.i not within the hcartes of the god^y,
but outwardly aflTailcth themmeither doth fhe deadly wounde them
with her wepons,but only troublcth them,or fo hurteth thc.that yet
the woud is curahle.Forfaith,asPaulteachethjferuethvs for a ihield ^ x^ g
that beingeholdcnvpagainft weapons, doth foreceiue die force of j^^ '
them,that it either vtterly driueth the backc , or at Icaft fo brcakcth
their violece,that they can notpearcc them to danger of life. Ther-
fore when faith is fhaken , it is like as if a ttrongc fouldiour with the
violent llroke of a dart be compelled to remoue his foote,and eeuc
groundc a litle:and when faith it felfe is wounded, that is like as if his
buckler by fome ftroke be in fome parte broken , but yet fo that it is
not ftriken through . Fcralway the godly minde will attaine to rife
thus hie as to fay with Dauid , If I waike in the middeft of the flia- pfj. j.
dow of death,! will feare none cuilljbecaufe thou art with me. It is in 4, ^
deede terrible to walke in the daikenes of death,and it can not be but
that the faithful, how muchftrength foeUerthey baue,muft be afraid
of it. Yet becaufe this thought furmounteth it, that they haue God
prefent with them,and prouiding for their fafcty, that fearc is ouer-
come with alTurednelfe. For (as Auguftinc fayih) how great engines
foeuer the deuil raifcth vp againft vs,fo long as he poffeffeth not the
place of the heart } where faith dwelleth , he is caft out of the dores*
FF iij
Cap
2. Ofthemanerhowtoreceiuc
And fo if vvc may iudgc by the lucceircjthefaithfull not only e(cape
fafc from cuery batcclljro that byandby receiuing frefh courage they
are ready to come a'c:aine inco the ficld:but alfo that is fulfilled which
i.''oh.5 lohn faith in his canonical EpiftlerThis is rhe vidory that ouercom-
4. meth the v.'orld,euen your faith. For he affirmeth thar it fhal not on-
ly winne the vidory in one or few battels,or againft feme one alTault,
but alfo that it thall get theouerhande of the whole world, although
it be a thoufand times aflailcd.
2 2 There is an other kinde of feare and trembling,but fuch a one
as by it the afluredncfie of fa;th is fo nothin-? at all diminiOied, that
thtfrtby it IS the more foundly Ibbliilied. That is, wiicn the fanhfull
either in rhinking that the exami los of Gocis vengeance againft thq
wicrfcd arc iliewcd for lefTons for them to learne byjdo carefully be-
ware that they bapperj not to prouoke Gotls wrath aeainft themfel-
ues with the (ame oifenfes:or recordinge wjtii thcmfelues their ownc
mifcry , do le.irne tohangalrogether vpon the Lord without whom
they ice thcmftlues to be more fickle and fooner vanifhinge than any
blaft ot winde . For when the Apoftle,in fcttinge foorth the fcourgcs
i.Cor. wherewith the Lord in oleic time had puniihcd the people of Ifraell,
loxi. putteththe Corintiiians in feare that they entanele notthemfelues
with hlce euils:he dorh not thereby abate their affiancc,but only fha-
keth away the dulnes of the flttli by which faith is wont more to be
• oppreffed than {irtngthncd. And vvhenbe ta'ccth occafion of y lewes
fall to exhort him that ftadethjto take hccde thajt he fall nor,he doth
not thereby bid vs to wauer , as though we were nor fully allured of
our ftedfaftncfie,but only he taketh away arrogant prefumprion ar d
rafli trufting to much in our owne ftrcgrhjthat after the ti)ru{l:ing out
of theiewes,the Gentiles being rccciucd into their place, lliould not
to much outrngioL>fly triumphe agsinft rhe. Albeit he fpcaketh there
not only f o the faithfull , but alio in the fame faying comprehcndeth
the Hypocrite s that gloried onely in outward flicw. For neither doth
he adtnonifh euery man particularly , bui: makinge a comparifon be-
twene the lewes & the Gentiles,aftcr y he had fhewed that the lewcs
in this that they were reicded,did Ci^(]icv iuft punifhmei t for their vn-
belicfe and vnthankcfulncile,he alfo cxliorted the Gentiles that they
fhould nor,by being proud and extolling themfeluesjoofe the grace
of adoption lately conueyed into them . But as in that generall reic-
ifting of the Iewcs,thcre remained yet fome that were not fallen from
the couenant of adoption , fo outofthe Gentiles there might arifc
fomcjwhich without true faith,fhould he puffed vp onely with foqlifh
confidence of the flefh,and fo abufe Gods louing knidenelic to their
ownc
tu
The grace of Chrift, Lb.j. ,228;
ownc (ieftru(!;lio(i.Buc altliough you take this as fpokcn to the ele<ft &
£aithfuU, yet thereupon (hall folow no inconuenience . For it is one
thinge to holde downe the rafli prefumption which out oFdie rtm-
nantes.ofi:he flefli creepeth fomerime euen into the holy ones , that
with vainc confidence it waxe not outragioufly wantoniand an oiher
thing to ftrike the cofcience with fearc, that it reft not with fuli aflu--
rcdnefle in the mercy of God.
2 1 The,when he teachcth,that with fearc & trembling we fhould
worke our owne (aluation , he requireth nothinge elfe , but that we _,
fhould accuftomevs with much abacing of our felaes,reucremly to ^^ '
lookc vp vnto the mightineflfe of God . For truely nothmg doth fo
much awake vs to caft all our confidence & aflurance of minde vpon
the Lord as doth the diftruft of our felues and carefulnes concciucd
by knowledge in cofcience of our own wretchednes. And according
to this meaning is that faying in the Prophet to be takenrin the mul- pa. 5.$
titude of thy goodneiTe Iwillcntre into thy temple : I will worHiip in
feare. Where he comely coioyneth the boldnes of faith that leaneth '
vpon Gods mercy with arcuerent fearc , wich we muft needes feele
fo oft as comming into the fight of Gods maiefty,we pcrceiue by the
glorious brightnefle thereof, how great is our owne filthinefle. And
Salomon fayth truely, where he pronounceth the manbieffed, that Pro.zS.
continually maketh his owne heart afraid, for by hardninge thereof ' 4.
inen fall hedlong into euill. But fuch feare he meanech as may make
vs more heedefull,not fuch wherby we fhould be troubled & vtrerly
falheuen fuch a feare as when the minde confounded in it felfe^doth
recouer it fclfe againe in God:when defpeinng it felfe, it reuiueth by
truft in him.Therfore there is no caufe to the contrary ,but that the
feithfull may at one time both be in feare , and alfo enioy moft aflli-^
red c6fort,in rcfped that fomenme they wrne their eyes to behold
their owne vanity, & fometime they caft the thought of their minde
vpon the trueth of God.Buthow(wiU fome man ray)lli.ill feare and
fajth dwell both in one minde ? euen thus , as contrarily ynfenfiblc^
dulncire,and carefulncfie. For wheras the wicked trauaile to procure t
to.themfelues a want ofgriefc., that no feare of God might trouble.
them,yet,the ludgemcn^pf God fo prcfl'eth them, that they can not
attaine that which they djefire,So there is nothing to withftande, but
^bat God may excrcife them that be his to humility, that in fighting
valiantly,they may reftiaine themfelues vnder the bridle of raodefty
And hy the procefle ofthe text it appeareth,that this was the eniec
of the ApoftlejWhcre he ailigneth the caufe of feare,and trembling
to be ihe good plc^fore gf God, whereby ,{je giueth to th/;m that be^
i:^r,t FF iiij
C^p.2 . Of the maner how to recciue
his bosh to will vvolljand valiantly to go through with it. According
***■ 3 5 to thjs meaning ought we to take that fayinge of the Prophet: The
children of Ifraei lliall feare God and his goodneffeibecaufe not on-
ly,"odlmes engedreth the reuerence of God, but the very fwetcncflc
and ple^fant taft of grace, filleth man bcingc difcouraged in himfelfc
with feare & admiration, ro make him hang vpon God, and humbly
yeelde himfelfe fubied to his power.
24 Yef we do not hereby make roome to that moft peftilcnt Phi-
lofophie , which many halfepapiftcs at this d«iy beginne to coynt in
comtrs . Por, becaufe they can not defendc thit grofle dotitfulnefle
which hath bin taught in Schoolcs , they flie to an other deuife , to
mike a confidecc mingled with ddtruflfulnes.l hey confefl'e,ihat fo
of: as we !ooke vnto Chrift, wc findc m him full matter to hope wpl:
but bcc.iufc we are alwayes vnworthy of thofe good things that are
offVcd vs irLChnftjthcy would haue vs to wauer & ftag^^er in behol-.
dinge of our owne vnworthineHe. Bricfely, they place confcience fo
betw-f ne hope & fcare, that it alcereth from the one to the other, by
ent. rchangcable tirt;es & courfescand they fo compare faith & hope
togethcr,that when the one fpringeth vp, the other is prefled downe,
when the one arrieth,the other againe fallcth . So when Satan feeth
that thofe open engines wherewith before time he was worn to de-
ftroy the afluiednefl'e of faith,do now nothinge prcuaile,hc endeuo-
reth by crooked vnderminin2;es to oucrthrow it. But what maner of
confidence fhall that be, which fliall novV and then yeeldc to defpera-
tion?If(fay they) thou confider Chrift , there is allured faluation:but
if thou rcturne to thy felfcjthere is allured damnation.Therefore of
ricceffi'iy dillruft and good hope inuit by enterchaungeabk courfes
rcigne in rhy minde: As though wc ought to imagine Chrift ftanding
a farre of,and not rather 4wellinge within vs. For therefore we looke
for filuation at his hande , not becaufe he appcareth a farre of vnto
vs, but becaufe he hath grafFed vs into his body ,& fo makcth vs par-
takers not onely of all his good thinges, but alfo of himfelfe. There-
fore I thus turne this their argument againft thcmfelues: If thou con-
fider thy relfc,there is certaine d.imnation.But becaufe Chrift with al
his good thinges is by way of communicatinge fo giuen vnto thee
, that all his thingcs are made thine, and thou art made a member of
him,yca & all one with him : his rightcoufneflc drowneth thy finnes,
his faluation taketh away thy damnation:hc by his worthineflc com-
meth betwcne thee and God,that thy vnworthincfle come not in the
fight of God.Bricfely,this is the truethrwe ought neither to (eparate
Chrill: from vs , nor vs from him , hue with both handes to hoUc h^
1-- that
The grace of Ch^ft. Lib.3, 22^
that fellowdiip whereby he hath coupled himfelte vnto vs . So the
Apoftle teacheth vs:The body in dede(r3ith he)is dead by rcafon of R«*n»t-
finne:buc the Spirite of Chrift that dwelleth m you,is hfe for righte- *°*
oufncfle. According to thefe mens trifeling dcuile he Hioulde haue
faide , Chrtll in deedc hath hfe with himillfe : bu; you,as you be fin-
nerSjfcmaine fubicd to death & damnation.But he faith faire other*
wife. For he teacheth that that damnation which we deferue of our
fclues, is (wallowed vp by the faluation of Chrift>and to proue it,he
vfcth the fame reafon that I haue alleged, becaufc Chrrft is not with-
out vs , but dwelleth within vs , and cleaueth vnto vs not onely with
vndiuidable knot of fellow{hip,but with a certame marucllous com-
munion daily more and more groweth with vs into one body, till he
be made altogether one with vs . And yet I denie not, as 1 haue fatd
« litle before , t;hat fomeiime there happen cert aine inrerruptions of
faith , as the weakcnelTe thereof is amonge violent fodeine motions
bowed hether or thether. So in the thicke mifte of tetations the light
thereof IS choked , but what fo euer happeneth , it ceffeth not from
cndeuourto feckc God.
2^ And no otherwife doth Bcrnarde argue , w^hen he purpofely
intreatethof this queftionin his fiftHomelie in the Dedication of
the temple. Ofientimes(I fay)by ihe benefite of God ftudying vpo
the foule, me rhinkes I findc in it two thinges as it were contrarie. If
I beholdc the foule it felfe , as it is in it felfe and of it (e\f^ , I caH fay ,
nothing more truely of it , than that it is vttcrly brought to nought,
Whatneed^ 1 now to rccken vp particularly all the mifenes of the
foule, how Jt is loadcn with finnes , couered wiih darknefle , entan-
gled with deceitful! enticementcs, itching with [uftes> fubied to paf>
(ions,hlkd with lUuIions, alway cnclined to euili , bent to all kindes
■of vice,finally ful of (hame and confufion?Now if all the very righte-
Oufncflfcfof it bang looked vpo by the light of trueth be found like
a clothe ftainedv/ithfloures, then what {hall the vnrighteoufncfles ^' *'
thereof be accompred ? If the light that is in vs be ^arkcncfle, how Matt. 6,
great Hiall the very darkenefle be ? What then ? without doubtc man i j.
is made like vnto vanitie t man is brought to naught: man is nothing.
But how then is he vtterly nothing,whomc God dothmagnifie? How
then is he nothing , towarde whome Gods heartc is fet ? Brcthren,Ict
vs take hearte againe. Though we be nothing in our owne heartes,
peraduenturc there may fomewhatof vs lie hidden in the heartc of
God.O father of mercies?0 father of the miferable,how doeft thou
fet thy hearte towarde vs ? For thy heartc is where thy treafure i$.
But how be we thy crcafure^if we be nothing ? AU nations are fo be-
Gnp.2. Of the iTitner how to receiuc
fore thee as if they were not, they fhalbe reputed as nothing. Euert
before thee, not within thee : fo in the iudgement of thy truth , but
notiniheaffedionof chypitie. Thou calleft thofe thinges that are
not,as though they were. Therefore both they are not,becaufe thou
calleft thofe thinges that are not,& ahb they are bycaufe thou calleft
them. For though they are not , in refpe<ft of them felues, yet with
Rom. $. thee they are,accorcIing to that faying of Paule,not of the workes of
^ »• righteoufnefl'e,but of him that calie:h. And then he faieth, thatthis
coupling together of both colideracions is maruellous. Truely thofe
thinges that are knit together, doe not the one dcftroy the other.
Which alfo in the conclufion be more plainely declareth in thcfc
wordes. Nowifwithboththefeconfiderationswe diligently looke
vpon our fclues what we be , yea in the one confidcration how we be
nothing , and in the other how much we be magnified , I thinke out
glorying (cmeth to be ternpered,but paraduenture it is more encrea"
fed. Truely it is pcrfe(^ly ftablillied » that we glorie not in our felue$
but in the Lorde. If we thmke thus : if he hath determined to fauc
vs,we fiir.ll byandby be dcliuered : now in this we may take courage.
But let vs climbe vp into a hier watchc toure , and feeke for the citio
of Godjfetke for the temple,feeke for the houfe, feke for the fpoufc,
I haue not forgotten , but I fay it with feare and rcucrcnce , we I fay
be , but in the haitc of God. We be , but by hij allowing as worthy,
not by our owne worthinefle.
16 Now , the feare of the Lorde , whereof commonly in euery
place witneife is borne to all the holy ones,3nd which is in fonre pla-
Prou.i . ces called the beginning of wifedome, and in (bme places wife dome
'• it felfe, although it be but one, yet it procencth from a double vn-
^j^ derftanding. For God hath in himfelfe the reuerence both of a Fa-^
Pro. 1 5. ther and of a Lorde. Therefore he that will truely worfliip him, wiJil
1 4- endeuor to fhewe himfelfe both an obedient fonne and a feruifable
MaU. I. fernantvnto him. The obcdicncethatis geuento him as to a father,
^' the Lorde by his Prophet calleth honor : the feruicp that is done to
lob 8. him as to a lorde,he calleth fearc.The fonne(faieth hc)hpnoreth the
»3 . father,and the feruant the lorde. If I be a fathcr> where is my honor?
If I be a lorde, where is my feare ? But how foeuer he putteth diffe';'
fence betwene them,thoufeeft how he confoundeth them both to-
gether. Therefore let the feare of the lorde be vnto vs a reuerence,
mingled with that fame honor and feare. Neither is it any maruell, if
one minde receiue both thofe affcdions . For he that confidercih
with hirr.felfe what a father God is vnto vs > hath caufe enough , aJU
though there were nohellesatall,why he iliguldc drede hisd»'"ple2i-
fy^c-
The grace of Chrift. Lib.;. 230
furc more greuoulciy than any death. But alfo ( fuch is the wanton-
ncfle ofourflellii to runne to licentioufncire of (inning ) ro reftraine
the C^mc by all meanesjwe ought thercwuhall to take iiolde ©f .this
thought, that the Loide vndcr whofe power we liue , abhorrcth all
inrquitie , whofe vengeance they lliall notcfcape , that in huing wic-?
kedly doe prouokc his wrath againft thcmfelucs.
27 But that which lohn faieth , that feare is not in cbaritie, but i.ToYl^.
perfed charitie cafteth out fearc , becaufe feare conteineth punifh- ^^'
mentjdifagrceeh not with this that we fay. For the wicked feare not
God in this r.efpcd that they drcde to incurre his difpleafurcjif they
migbc do it without punifhmrnt : but becaufe ihcy know him to be
armed with power to reucngc : therefore they fliake for feare at the
hearing of his wrath. And alfp they fo feare his wrath , be caulc tht^y
thinkc that it hangeth ouer themjfor that they looke euery moment
when itfhall fall vpon their heades . As for the faitbfull : they (as i$
aboue faid)both feare his di'plcafurc more than punifhment,and are
not troubled with feare of punifhment as if it did hang ouer theit
neckes, biit^hey are made the more ware not to procure it. So faith
the Apofile , when he fpeaketh ro the faithful! ; Be ye not deceiued: EpJi«, 5;
for this commeth the wrath of God vpon the children of vnbeleefe. *•
He threarcnetii not th.u Gods wraih will come vpon them , but put* ^°* >•*
tcththemin mindeto thinke vpon this, that the wrath ofGodi*
prepared for fuch v/icked domges as he had recited.that they them-
felues fhoulde no: be willing alfo to proue it. Albeit it fcldome hap-
pcneih that the rcprobare be awakened wi;h only and bare thrt ate-
njngesjbut rather being alre.?dy croiTe and vnfenhbly dull with their
ov/ne hsidneife, (6 of: as God thundreth from heauen they hai den
then-.felues to obftmacic, but when they are ones ftriken with his
hande,thenwheLherthey willorno, they be enforced to feare. This
feai e they commonly call a feruile fearerand in comparifon fct it for
contrarie to free natured and willing feare which becommeth chil-
dren. Some other do futtclly thruft in a middle kinde , becaufe tha?
fame feru'Je and conftrained affedion fometime fo fubdueth mens
mindeSjthat they come willingly to the feare of God.
28 Now we vnderftandjthat in the good will of God , wherunto
faith is faide to haue refped, the polfefljon of faluation and eternall
life is obteined . For if we can wante no good thing while God is fa-
uorable vnto vs,it abundantly fufficcth vs to the afluredncifc of falua-
tion, when he himfelfc dothaflurc vs of his loue . Let him fhewe his
face(raith the Prophet)and we fhalbc fafe. Wherupon the Scriptures PtiU^o
iietermine this to be the fumme of our faluation , that God putting 4.
Cap.2 . Of the mancr how to rccciuc
[phe.x* away all enmitieSjhath recciued v$ into fauour. Whereby they fbew,
4» that when God is reconciled vnto vs, there remaineth no perill , but
that all thingcs fhall profper well with vs . Therefore faith , hauing
taken holde of the louc of God,hath promifes of the prefent life and
of the life to come, and perfed afluredneffc of all good ihinges : but
that fame fuch as may be gathered out of the word of God. For faith
• doth not certaincly promife to it felfe either the length or honor or
wealth of this life , for afmuch as God willed none of thefethinges
to be apoimed vnto vs , but is contented with this aflurednefl'e , that
God will neuer faile how fo euer many thinges faile vs that pcrtainc
to the maintenance of this prefent life . Buc the chiefe afTurednefle
of faith reftcth in expedation of the life to come, which is fct out of
doubt by the wordc of God. But what fo eucr miferics and calami-
ties betide vnto them whome God loueth , they can not worke the
concraric, but that his good will is perfeft felicitie. Therefore when
we did meane to exprcfle the fumme of blelfednefle , we named the
fauor of Godjout of whieh fpring do flow vnto vs al kindes of good
thinges. And this we may comonly note throughout the Scriptures,
that when fo euer mention is made not onely of eternall faluation,
but alfo of any good thing in vs,we be alwny called backe to the louc
Hx. <Jj. ^^ God, For which caufe Dauid faieth , that the goodneffe of Go4
^. when it is felt in a godly hearte,is fweter and more to be defired than
life it felfe. Finally, if all thinges els do flow vnto vs according to our
owne williing,and we be vncertainc of Gods loue or hatred,our fe-
licitie flialbe accurfed, and therefore miferable. But if the fauorable
face of God do fhine vnto vs , euen our very miferics {Kalbe blelTcd,
torn. 8. becaufe they are turned to helpes of our faluation. As Paule , when
15' he heaped vp a rehearfall of all aduerGties , yet he glorieth that he
was not by them fcuered from the loue of God:and in his prayers he
alway bcginncth at the fauour of God,from whence flowcth ill pro-
*ra. 2 J. fperitie. Likcwife Dauid fctteth the onely fauour ofGodagainft all
h the terrors that trouble vs . If (faith he) 1 fhall walke in the middcft
of the {Kidowc of death, 1 willfeare no euils , becaufe thou art with
me. And we alway feele that our mindes do wauer,vnlefle being c6^
tented with the fauour of God,they fceke their peace in it,and haue
>ra. 3 1. *^** in wardely Hxed in them that is faid in the Pfalme , Blefled is the
I au people whofe God is the Lord,and the nation whomc he hath cho-
Icn to him for his inheritance,
Z9 We make the fimdation of faith to be the free promife of
God, bycaufe faith proprcly ftaycth vpon it . For though faith doc
bcleue God to be true in all thinges , whether he commaande dv
for-
The grace of Chrlft. Lib. 3. 231
forbidde,whether he promifc or threaten, and alfo obediently rccei-
ueth hsscommaunticmcntes, and bcwarcthof ihinges that he pro-
hibeieth, and hath regard to his ihreatcnir>ges , yet properly it bc-
ginncth at the promile,and therein continueth , and thercvpon en-
dcth. For faith feckcth for life in God, which is nor fouiide in com-
maundemetes or declarations of penalties, butin promife of mercic,
and in no other promifc , but fuch as is freely geuen. For the condi-
tional! promifejby which we are feme to our owne woi kes, doth no
otherwjfc promife hfe, but if we perceiue it toftandcinour felucs.
Therfore if we will not hauc our faiih to tremble and wauctjwe muft
ftjy it with that promifc of faluation, which is willingly and liberally
offlcd vs of the LoFde , rather in rcfped of our mifcric , than of our
worthinefle . Wherefore the Apoftlc beareth this witneCTc of the Rom.ie
Gofpell,that it is the word of faithzwhich name he taketh both from *.
the commaundememes and alfo from the promifes of the lawe, bc-
caufe there is nothing that can ftablifh faith, but that liberall emba(i-
fage, by which God reconcilcth che worlde to himfelfe . Therefore
ihe fame Apoftle oftentimes makeih a rclatio of faith and the Gof- Roro.i.
pell together , when he tea^cth that the minifteric of the Gofpcli ^- *"<*
was committed to him vnto the obedience of faith . that the fame is ' *'^'
the power of God,to faluation to euery one that bcleuethrthatin ic
is rcucled the rightcoufnes of God from faith to faith. And no mar-
uell.For fith the Gofpeil is the minifterie of reconciliation, there is a.Cor.5
no other tcftimonie lure enough of Gods good will towarde vs, the 18,
knowledge wherof feith recjuireth.Therefore when we fay that faith
muft reft vpon free promife,we do not denie but that the faithful do
euery way embrace and receiue the word of God,but we apoint the
promife of mercic to be the propre marke of fairh.Eucn as the faith-
full ought in deede to acknowledge God to be the iudge and pu-
nillicr of wicked doingcs , and yet they properly haue regard vnto
his mercifull kindcneflc : forafmuch as he is dcfcribed to them to P&«*f-
be c 5fider ed fuch a one as is louing and mercifuil,farre from wrath, I ^ '***
,• of much goodnelTe , gentle vnto all , pouring fofth his mercie vpon
'^ all his workes. - , .
50 Neither yet do I regarde the barkingcsof Pighius, or fuch
other doggeSjwhcn they linde faulte with this reftraint^as though in
diuiding faith , it did tike holde but of one pcccc thereof. 1 graunt
(as I haue already faide) thatihe generallobicctof faith (as they
termc it)is the trut lie of God,whether he threaten or put vs in hope
of fiuour. Wherefore the Apoftle afcribeih this to faith, that Noc HcV^
feated the dcib ui^wn of the worlde, when it was not yet feene. if the 7-
Cap.2. Oftliemanerhowtoreceiuc
feaie of a puftiilbment fliordy to come, w.is the worke of faith, theit
ought not the threateninges to be excluded out of the dcfinicion of
faith. This is in deede true. But the cauillers dovniuftlyaccufe vs,
asthough wc denied that faith hath refpedtoall the partes of the
worde ofGod.For our meaning is onely to Hie w thofc two tbingcs,
liirft, that faith neuer lUdfaftly ftandeth vntill it come to the free
prorriifc: and than that we are no orherwife by it to be reconcfled to
God ,"*but bccaufe it coupleth vs to Chriil: . Both thofe pointes are
worthily to be noted. We fceke fucha faith , which may make diffe-
rence betwerfethe children otGod and the reprobate, betwene the
faithfuUand the vnbeleuing. Ifa mcin^id beicue that God both iuft*
ly comn-.aundcih all that he commaxjndeth ^ and nuely threatneth,
ihallhe be therefore called faithfuU ? Nothing leffc.Therefofe there
can be no ftedfaft ftay of faith , vnlefle it bie grounded vpon the mer-
cie of God . But now to what ende do we diipute of faith ? Is it not
that we may learnc the' way of faluation ? Buc how doth faith biinge
faluation but in refoeift riia'c it graffeih vs into the body of Chrift ?
Therefore there is no Pnconueftiencc , if in the deHnition we do en-
force the principall effed iherofj& doifiyiie vnto the general name,
in ftede oi'^ difference that marke that feuereth the faithfull ft 5 the
-vnbeleuing. Finallyjtbe malicious haft* nothing to finde fault withall
Sloa).io in this do<fliine , but they muft wrappe vp Paule with v* in the fame
•*• -felame, which calleththeGofpell properly the word of faith.
31 But hereupon againc we gather that which wehaue before
-declared, that faith doth no leffe neede the worde than the firute doth
Pfa, S' ^ccde the liuely rootc of the tree, becaoie none other ( as Dauid te-
»'• -ftiheth ) can truff in the Lorde,but thfey that know his name.But thi«
knowledge is not according to euery mans imagination, butfo farre
-asGodhimfelfe is witncffeof his owne ^oodneffe. Which the (amt
Pfa K0 9'^^*^P^^'^^°"^""^^^ *" ^" Other place,faying:Thy faiuation is accor-
^j, dinge to thy worde . Againe. I haue tmfted in thy worde , faue mc,
•^ . Where is to be n6ted the relation of £iiih to the worde , and then
;hov/ faluation foUdweth. And yet in the ifneane time we do not ex-
clude the power of God , with beholding whereof, vnleffe faith lu-
fterne it felfe,it can neuer geue vnto God his due honour.Paule fee-
Fom.4. Tnerh toreherfe acertaine fclender|andc6mon thing of Abraham;
ii. that he bcleucd that God which had promifed him the bleffed fede,
was able copfrforme it. Againe in an other place, fpeakingof hinr,
a Tim I ^^^^^ ' ^ knowc whomc 1 haue bcleued, an-d h&m fure that he h>s able
%$,^ 10 kecpe that which I haue left with him vnttU that day.But if a man
-wey* With himrdfe how many doutmges of the power of God.do
often-
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3 . 23 2
oftentimes creepe into mans mmde , he Ihall well pcr(iciue that they
Vvhich do highly eftceme it as it js worthy, hauenotalitle profited'
in fiith. We all will confefTe that God is able to do whatfoeuer he
Vf-ill) but when euen the Icaft tentatio throweth vs downc with feare,
and amaleth vs with horrour,thcrcby appeareth plainely, that wc di-
minifli the eftimation of Gods power , when we preferrc abouc it
ihofe ihmgcs, that Satan threatneth againft Gods promifes. This is
the reafon why Efaie,meaning to print into the hartcs of the people
the aflfurednefl'e of faluation , doth fo honorably entrcate of the in-
finite power of God. Icfeemeth oft that fo fone as he hath begonne
to fpeakc of the hope of pardon and rceoncihation , he byandby
tourneth to an other thingjand wandereth about in long and fuper-
fiuous cireumftances j rchcrfing how marueloufly the Lorde goucr-
nerh the frame of he^en and earth and the whole ordre of natures
yet is there nothing that feructh not fittly for the circumttace of the"
matter that he fpcikcth of. For vnleffe the power of God whereby
h« is able to do all thinges be prcfenily fet before our ey esjour cares
m]i hardely hcare the wordc , or will not efteeme it fo much as it is
worth. Befide that,here is declared his effeduall power,becaufe god-
lineflTe (as we haue already (hewed in an other place) doth alway ap-
blie the power of God to vfc and worke,fpecially ic fetteth before ic
lelfe thofe workes of God , whereby he hath tcftjfiedhimfelfe to be
a father; Herevpon commeth that in the Scriptures is fo often men-
tion made of the redemption , whereby the Ifraelites might haue'
learned that God which was ones the author of faluation , will be an^
cuerlaftiiig preferuer thereof. -And Dauid putteth v& in minde by hitf
bwne example,thatdiofcbenefites which God hath particularly bc-
fiowfed vpon euepy trVab, do aftewarde auaite to the confirmation ®f
his faith. Yea when Godieemeth to haue forfaken vs , it behoueth
vs to ftrerch out wities further, that his auncienc bcnefitcs may re-
comforte vSjas it is faide in an other Pfalme : 1 haue bene mindefuU pfa^ioo
ofoldedayes,Ihaueftudiedvponallthyw6rkcs,Ac;. Againe. I will 4?-
i^emer^bre the worbe* of the Lorde, and his meruellcs from the be- ^^*^'77*
ginning. But becauife without the worde all quickely vanifheth away .\'.w .A
that we conceiue of thepowep of God and of his woiics , therefore ^ '
we do hot without cattfeaffirme that tliere is no faith, vnleffc God '
ge«e hght vnto it with teftimonie of his grace . But here a queftion
might be moued : what is to be thcupht of Sara ^d Rebecca , both Gca.i&
which being moucd asit feemcth wichzele of 'fairh,pafied beyondc>»
the bondes of the worde, Sara , when (he feruently dcfired the pro-
mifcdifiuejgaue her bondemaidc to her houfbande . It can notb:
Cap.2, Of the maner how to recciuc
denied but that (he many wayes finned: but nowe T touch onely thif
faulte , that being carried awaye with her zcle , fhe did not reltrainc
bcriclfe within the boundes of Gods word,yetit is ceitaine that that
Cen.2^ dcd're proceeded offaith. Rebecca being certified by the oracle of
God ofihe electi5 of her fonne Iacob,procur^d his blefling by euill
crafty meanes;ilie deceiucdher housb.inde the witncfle andminiiter
of the grace of God : ihe compelled her fonne to lie : ihe by diuerfc
guiles and deceitcii corrupted the cruerh of God. Finally in making
a fcornc of his promife,the did as much as in her laie, deitroie it. Ana
yet this a<ft, how much foeuer it was euill, and vvoi thy of blame , was
not without faith , for it was neceffarie that (he ihoulde ouercomc
many offenfcs , that Ihe might fo earnefljy endcuour to * tteinc thai
- which without hope of earthly profite was full of great troubles and
daungers. As we may not fay that the holy Patriarc;he ifaac was ahor
gethcr without faith , becaufe he being by the fame oracle of God
admonilhed of the honour transferred to the yonger foime,yetccf-
ied not to be more fauourably bente to his tirft begotten fonne E(auL
Truely thefe examples do teach.that oftetimes crroures are mingled
with faithj but yet fo that faith if it be a true faith , haih alwaye the
Tpper hande. For as the particular errour of Rebecca did not ma^c
voide the effed of the blefling, fo neither did it make voide her faith
which generally reigned in her mindt.*, and was the beginning; and
caufc of that doingc . Neuertheldfe therein Rebecca vttered how
ready mans minde is to fall fo fone as he geueth him felfc neuer fo
litle libcrtie. But though mans defaut and weakenefTc doth darker!
faith , yet it doth not quenche it : in the meanc time it putteth vs in
niinde, how carefully we ought to hangevpon the mouth ofGod>
aftd alfo confirmeth that which we haue taught, that faith vanilhtth
awaye, vnlifie it be vpholden by the worde ; as the mindes both of
Sara,and Ifaac andRcbecca had become vaiiie in their crooked wan-
deringcs out of the wayjVnlelTe they had bene by Gods fecret bridle
holdcn in obedience of the worde. <
^z Againc,notwichoutcaufe we include all the promifcs in Chrift,
Rom. K forafmuch as in the knowledge of him the Apoftle includeth all ihc
«7- Gofpell: and in an other place he tcacbcth,. that all tbepromilesof
a Com (^qJ ^^^ in him, yea and Amen . The re'afon whereof is ready to be
flievA cd. For if God promife any thing , he therein fhcwcth his good
will : fo that there ij no promife of his, that is nbt a tcttimonie of his
• louc. Neither maketh it any matter thst the wickedvvhen they hauc
great and continual bcncfites of Godsliberahtie heaped vpon thenij
do therby wrap thcmfeiucs iafo much the more grcuous iudgemeti
For
The grace of Chrifl:. Lib.3. 233
For Cth tliey do neither thinkc nor acknowledge thac thofc thingcs
come vntothem from the hand of God. for if thev acknowlcdize it.
they do not wiih them fclues con<:der his goodnefle, therfore they
can not thereby be better taught of his mercie than brute beaftes,
which according to the mcafure of their eftate,do receiuc the fame
frute of Gods Jiberv-'litiejand yet they perceiue it not.Neither doth
it any more make againft vs. , that mpny times in refufing the pro-
mifes apomted for them , they do by that occal;on procui e lo them
Telues the greater vengeance. For although the cftedtiailwoikmgof
the promjfcs do then onely appeare , when they haue ^oiinde faith
withvs, yet the force .ind natural! propretic of tKem isneuer extin-
guiflied by oar vnbeleefe or vnihankfulnefle . Therefore when the
Lorde by his promiles doth prouoke man not onely toreceiue , but
alfo to thinke vpon the frures of his bountifulneffe, he doth rhere-
withail declare vnto him his loue . Wherevpon we muil returne to
this poinre , that euery promife is a teftifymg of Gods loue towarde
vs.Butitis outofquc{h6,th3tnorrianislouedofGodbutinChMfl-> Mat. j,
he is the beloued Sonne, in whomc the loue of the Father abideth '7«
and rcfteth , and then from i:im poureth it felfe abroade vnto vs : as
Paule teachcih , that we haue obceined fauour in the beloued one. Ep^«.i
Therefore it muft necdes be dcriued and come vnto vs by meane of '^•
him. For this caufe theApoiile in an other pjacecalleth him oure ^P^^**'
peace : in an other place he fctt cth him oute as a bonde , whereby ^
God is with fatherly naturall kindcnes bounde vnto vs. It follovvcth
then that we muft caftc our eyes vpon him >fo oft as any prcmifeis
offered vs. And that Paule teacherh noabfurditie,tbatall Gods pro Rom J.
miles whatfoeucr they be,are confirmed and fulfilled in him. There >• a"<l*
be certaine examples that make for the contrarie,For it is not likely ^ ^'^'
that Naaman the Syrian, when he required of the Prophetthe ma- y^^ ,q^
ner how to worfhip God aright , was inftrudcd concerning the Me- 8.
diator : yet his godlincfle is prailed . Cornelius a Gentile and a Ro- Ad.S.
maine , coulde fcarfcely vnderftande that which was knowen not to ^ ^^"•^'
all the lewes , yea and that very darkely : yet his almes and prayers *^*
were acceptable to Gcd. And the facrifice of Naaman , by the Pro- ^ ^^ -
phetes aunfwere allowed. Which thing neither-<>f them coulde ob- I'y, '
teine but by faith.Likcwife it may be faid of the Eunuchc ro whomc aQ.Z,
Philippe was carried,which if he had n»>t had fome faith, woulde not ^ J*
haue taken vpon him the trauaile and expenfes of fo long a iourney,
to worfhippe.Yet we fee,when Philippe examined him,how he be-
wrayed his ignorace of the Mediator. And truely I graunt that their
faith wa« partly vncxpieflcd, not ondy concerning Chriftes pcrfon,
GQ
Cap. 2 . Ot the mancr how to rccciuc ^
but alio concerning his power and the office committed vnto him of
the Father. Yet in the meanc time it is certainc , that they were in-
fti ucted in fiich principles,as gauc then fomc taft of Chrift,although
but very fmall. Neither ought this to fecme ftrage. For neither would
the Eunuche haue come in haft to lerufalem from a farre country to
worlhfp an vnknowenc God,ncuher did Corndius whe he had once
embraced the lewilli rehgion fpende (o much time , without being
acquainted with the firft groundes of true dodrine.As for Naaman,
it had bene to fonde an aUurditic for Elizeus when he taught hi tn
of (mall thi;i;j>sto haue faidc nothing of the principal! point. There-
fore although there were among them a darkc knowledge of Chrift,
yet it IS not likely y there was no knoweledge becaufe they did vfc
them felues in the {acrifices of the lawe , which muft haue bene dif-
cerned by the very ende of them , that is Chnft , from the hlCe. fa-
crifices of the Gentiles.
jg But this bare and outward declaration of the worde of God,
ought to haue largely fufficed to make it be beleued , if our owne
blindeneflc and rtubbournefTe did not withftande it. But oure mindc
hath fuch an inclination to vanitie,that it can neuer cleaue faft vnto
the trueth of God , and hath fuch a dulneflc , that it is alwaie blmdc
and can not fee the light thereof Therefore there is nothing auaila-
bly done by the worde without the enlightning of the holy Ghoft.
Whereby alfo appearetb , that faith is farre aboue mans vnderftan-
ding. Neither fhail it be fufficient that the minde be lightned with
the fpiritof GodjVnltfle the hcarie be alfo ftrengthened& ftablillied
with his power. Wherein the Schoolemen do altogether erre,which
in coniideringof faith ,do onely take holde of a bare and fimple aC-
fcnc by knowledge ,leauing out the confidence and afTuredneffc of
the hearte.Thercfore faith is both waies a fingulargift of God,both
that the minde of man is clcnfed to taft the trueth of God , and thac
his hearte is ftabliflied therein. For the holy Ghoft not onely is the
beginnerof faith, but alfo by degrees encreafeth it, vntill by it he
t .Tim.i bring vs to the heauenly kingdome. That good thing ( faith Paule)
' 4- which was committed to thy keping , kepe in the holy Ghoft which
^^'h^* dwellethin vs. ButhowPaulefaith that the holy Ghoft is geucn by
the hearing of faith , we may eafily diffolue it. If there had bene but
one onely gifte of the holy Ghoft, then it h.id bencanabfurditicfor
him to call the holy Ghoft the efFed of faith,whijch is the author and
ciufe of faith . But wh<n he maketh report of the giftes wherewith
God garnirtieth his Church,and by cnci ea(inges of faith bringeth it
to pcifeclion , itisnomcruell if he alcribc thofe tlijnges to faith
which
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 234
which maketh vs b tt to rccciuc them. This is reckened a nftoft ftragc
conclufion,whcn it is faid) that no man but he to whome it is geuen,
can beleue m Chrift. Bur that is partely bycaufe they do not con(ider
cither how fccret and hie the heauenly wifedome is , or how great
mans dulncfl'c is m conceiuing the roiftcrits of Godiand parttly by-
caufe the^'looke not vnto than oflured andftedfaft conftantuclfe of
hcarte, that is to fay, ihe chiefe parte of faith.
^4 Butif (asPaul^pTeacheth)no man is wirnefTeof the willof i.Cor.:
man,biJt the fpirit of man that is within him, then how flioulde man ^ ^*
be fureof thewillof God? Andif the trueth of God be vncertainc
among vs , in thofe thingcs that we prefcntly beholde with our eye,
howc Ihoulde it be adured and fteadfaft among vs there where the
Lord promifeth fuch thing ss neither eye feech>nor witcomprchen-
dcth?But herein mans (harpncife of vnderftadingis fo ouerihrowenc
andfaileth, that the firft degree of profiting in Gods fchoole , is to
forfake his owne wit.For by it as by a veile caft before v5,wc are hin-
died that we can not attcinc the miftcries of God,which are not dif-
clofedbuttohtleones. For neither doth flefh and bloude difclofe, M^at.ii,
nor naturall man perceiuc thofc thinges that are of the Spirite , but ' ^•
rather to him the harrtingof Godisfoohflmeflc,becaufeitis (pin- ^^ ^'^°
tually to be iudged. Therefore herein the helpe of the holy Ghoft is Maci^
necclfaricjor rather herein his force only rcigneth. There is no man 17-
that know.eth the minde of God,or hath bene his counreller.-but the '•^*^'f •'
holy Spirit fearcheth out all thin2;es,euen the depe fecrctes ofGod, p^*
by whome it is brought to palie,tnat wc knowe the minde of Cmilt. j 4.
No man (faith he ) can come to me , vnlefle my father that fent mc, t.Cor.j
drav/c him.Eueryonc therefore that hath hearde and learned of my '°'
father,commeth.Not that any man hath fcenc the father,but lie that ** "' '
is fent of God. Euen as therefore wc can not come vnto Chrift, but
being drawene by the Spirite of God : fo when we be drawcne > wc
are lifted vp in wit and minde aboue our owne vndcribnding . For
the foule enhghtned by him.taketh as it were a new IharpncQe of vn-
dcrftanding , wherewith it may beholde heauenly mifteries, with
brighinelTe whereof it was before dafeled in it felfe. And fo mans vn-
derftanding rcceiuing brightnes by thehghtof the holy Ghoftjdodi
neuer till then tru^ly beginne to taft of thofe thinges that belong to
the kingdome of God,being before altogether vnfauourie and with-
out iudgcment of taft to take aflay of them. Therefore whe^iChnft Luc.a4.
did notably fet our vnto two of his Difciples y mifteries of his king- *?• arxi
dome , yet he nothing prcuailed , vntill he opened their fcnf<?s that ^^'
they might vnderftand the Scriptures . When ihe Apoftlcs vrerefo ,? * '
CG ij
Cap.2 . Of the mancr how to recciuc
taught by his Godly mouth , yet the Spirit of trueih muft be fcnt
vnto thcm,to poure into their mindes the fame dodiine which they
had he^rde v/ich their cares The vvorde of God is hke vnto the funne
that rhineth vnto all them to whome it is preached, but to ilo profit
among bhnde men. But we are all in this behalfe bhnde by nature,
therefore it can not pearcc into our minde but by the inward matter
the holy Ghoft^making by his enlightn:ng an entric for it.
55 In an other place,when we had to entreat of the corruption
of nature,we haue more largely fliewed how vnfit men are to beleuc.
Thcrfore I will not wery the readers with repeting the fame againe.
i.^'or. Let this be fufficicnt that the fpiritoffaiihjs called of Paule faith it
*• ' ^' felfc 5 which the fpirit geueth vs , but not which we haue naturally.
t.Thef. Therefore he prayeth that God fulfill in the Theflalonrans all his
I. n. good pleafurejand the WO! keoffaith in power.Wherin calling faith
the workcjof God,and geuing it ihat title for a name of addition, and
calling it by figure of appofitio Gods good pleafure, he denieth thai
it is of mans owne motiomand nor contented therewith he addeth
furthcr,that it is a declaration of Gods power: writing to the Corin-
thians, where he faith, th.it faith hangeth not vpon the wifedome of
mcn;,bnt is grounded vp5 the power of the holy Ghoft.He fpeaketh
in deede of outwarde miraclesibut becaufe the reprobate are blindc
at the beholding of themjhe comprehcndeth alfo that inwardc feale,
whereof he maketh mention in an other place. And God, the more
gloriouHy to fet forth his liberalitie in fo noble a giftejvouchefaueth
not to graunt it to all vniuerfally without difference , but by fingular
ptiuilcgc geueth it to whome he will. For proofe whereof we haue
alleged tcllimonies before.Of which Auguftine being a faithfull cx-
pofitor , crieth out that it woulde pleafe the Sauiour to teache him,
and that the very beleuing it felfe , is of gift and not of defcruing.
No man ( faith hc^ commeth to me , vnlefle my father drawe him,
and CO whome it is geuen of my father. It is maruellous that two do
he.ire, the one defpifeth, the other afcendeth vp. Let him that deH-
pifcth , impute it to himfelfe : let him that afcendc not, it arrogantly
afligne to himfelfe. In an other place.Why is it geuen to one and not
to an other?lt greueth me not to fay it,tbls is the depth of the crofle.
Out of I wote not what depth oftheiudgemenis of God which wc
may not fearche,procedcth all that we can.What 1 can,! fee : where-
by I can, I fee not, fauingthat I fee thus farre, that it is of God. But
why him, and not him? That ismuchetome. It is a bottomeleffe
depth, it is the depth of the crolfe. I may crie out with wonderinge,
but not fliewe it in difputing . Finally the fummc commeth to this,
that
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 235
that Chrift when he enliduneih v$ vnto faith by the power of his
fpirit, doth there withalT graffe vs into his body , tiiat wc may be
made partakers of all good thingcs.
56 Nowe remained! that that which the mihde hathe rcceiiicd,
may be further conueycd into the heart.For the word of God is not
throughly recciued by faith,if it fwimme in the toppe of the braine,
but when it hath taken roote in the bottome of the heart chat it may
be an inuincible defcnfe to bearc and repulfe all the engines of teta-
tions. Nowe if it be true , that the true vnderftandingof the minde is
the enlightning thereof, then in fuch confirmation of the hearte,his
power murh morecuidetly appcreth,cuen by fo much as the dilhuft-
folneflc of the hcartc is greater than the blindnefie of the wit; snd
as it is harder to haue the minde furnifhed with affurednefle, than the
wit to be inftruded with thinking.Therefore the Spirite pcrformeth
the office of a feale , to feale vp in our heartes thofe fatne promifes,
the aflurance whereof it firft emprinted in oure wit5,and ferueth for
an carncft to confirmc and ftablifh them . Sith ye beleued(raith the
Apoftle) ye are fcaled vp with the holy Spirlte of promifc, which is Eph. i.
the earned of oure inheritance. See you not how he teaclieth that 1 5
by the fpiritthe heartes of thcfaithfull are grauen as with a feale?3nd ^
how for thefamereafonhe calleth him the Spirit of promife,by-
caufe he r^tificththc Gofpcll vnto vs?Likewife to the Corinthians he a. Cor.
faiih :God which annointed vs, which hath alfo fcaled vs,andgcucn 21. am
the earncft of his Spirit in oure heartes. And in an other place when 5» 5»
he fpeaketh of confidence and boldnefle of hopingc well , he ma-
keth the pledge of the Spirit the foundation thereof.
37 Neither yet haue I forgotten that which I faide before , the
remembrance whereof experience continually rencweth, that is,that
faith is tofled with diuerfe doubtings,(b that the mindes of the godly
arc felJome quietjor at leaft do not alway cnioy a pcafable ftarc: buc
with what foeuer engine they be fhaken , either they rife vp out of
the very gulfc of temptations,or do abide faft in their ftanding.Truc-
ly this sirurcdnefle onely nouriflieth and defendeth faith , \vhen we
holdc faft that which ii faide in the Pfalme :The Lorde is oure pro- Pfil^i
tectioM.oure helpe in trouble, therefore we will not ^eare , when the 3»
earth (hall tremble, and the mountaines (hall leape into the heart of
the fea. Alfo this moft fwetc quietncffe is fpoken of in an other plice:
I lay downe and flepte, androfe againe, bycaufe the Lorde hath pf^^i .
fufteined mc.Tt is not meante thereby that Dauid was alway with one 6, '
rndifturbed courfe framed to amerry cheerefulnefTc.-butinrefped
that he tafted the grace of God,accordingto his proportion of faith.
G G iij
Cap.2. Oi the maner how to rcceiuc
therefore he gloricth that he without feare defpifeth all that euer
-■ might difquiecthe peace of his minde. Theifore the Scripture mea-
a.?o. "'"S ^^ exhort vs to fatth , biddeth vis to be quiet. In Efaie it is faide:
In ^ope and filence {liall be your ftrength.in the Pfalme:Holde tliee
'al.j7- (hllmtheLordc,and waiteforhim. Wherewith agreeth that faying
of the Apoftie to the Hebrues : Patience is needefull.iScc.
5* ' g8 Hereby we may iudge how pcftilent is that dodrine of the
Scholemen,that we can no otherwifc determine of the grace of God
lowardc vs.than by morall conicdure as eucry man thmketh himfclfc
worthy of it.Trucly if we fliall wey by oare workes how God is min-
ded towardc vs, Igrauiittliat wecanatteine itwith any coniedure,
be it neuer fo fclendcr : but fith faith ought to haue relation to a lim-
plc and free promifc , there is Icfte no caufe of doubting. For with
what confidence (1 befeche you) (hall wcbe armed . if we fay that
God IS fauourable vnto vs vpon this condicion/o that the pureneiTc
of oure hfe do defcrue it ? But bycaufe I haue appointed one place
proprely for the difcofling hereof, therefore I will fpeake no more
of them at this prefent , fpectally for afmuch as it is plnine cnoughc,
that there is nothing more contrary to faith , than either coniedurc
or any thing neere vnto doubting. And they do vcrv ill wryth to rhis
purpofe that telf imonsc of the Preacher which ihcy haue oft in theic
ccl.5. "^'^uths: Noman knoweth whether he be worthy of harrt d or loue.
For ( to rpeake nothing how this place is in the common tranflation
corruptly turned) yet very children can not be ignorar what Salomon
meaneth by fuch wordes:that i$,thatif any man will iudge by the pre-
fent ftate of thingesjwhome God hatcth,or whome God louethjie
laboreth in vaine,& troubleth himfelfe to no profitte 'or his pnines:
fith all thinges happen alike , both to the righteous and the wicked,
to him that offreth facriHces and him that offreth none. V/herevpon
followeth jthat God doth not alway witiicflc his loue to rhem to
whomt he maketh all things happen pi olperoufly.nor doih alwaies
I , Vtter the hatred to them whome he puniihtth. And that he doth to
', * ^* condemne the vanirie of mans witte.fith it is fo dull in thinges moft
necdcftill to be kiiowen. As he hadde written a little before , that it
ctn not be difctrned what the foule of a man differeth from y foulc
of a beaftjbecaufe it feemeth to dy in like manncr.Tf any mannc will
gather thereof, that the opinion thatwe holdc of the immortahtie
oF foules,ftandeth vpon c6iedure;may he not worthily be compted
a madde manne ? Are they then in their right wittes which gather
that there isfto ccitaintie of Gods grace, bycaufe wc can concciuc
none by the carnall beholding of prefent things? ^^
19 Bat
The grace of Chrifl:. Lib.5. 2^6
j9 But they alleage that it is a point of rafh prcfumption,to take
vpon vs an vndoubttd knowelcdge of Gods will . 1 would m deedc
graunt it vnto them, if we did take fo much vpon vs , that we would c
make the incomprehenfiblc fecrete purpofe of God fubied to
the fclenderncfTe of ©uie witte. But when we (imply fay with Paule, i.Cor.t
that wehaUereceiucdnot die fpirit of this world , but the Spirit that "•
is ofGod , by whofc teaching we may know thofe thinges that arc
geuen vs of God,what can they barke againft it,but they muft flaun-
deroufly fpeake againft the Spirifof God?But if it be a horrible rob-
berie of God to accufc the reuelatio that commeth from him,eithcr
lobe lying, orvnaflurcdordoubtefulljwhatdo wcoflfend in affir-
ming that It is alfurcdPBut they ray,that this alfo is not without grearc
prelumptuoufncffe, thatwc dare fo glonc of the Spirite of Chrift.
Who would thinke that their dulnefle were fo greate that would be
compted maift«rs of the world,that they fo fowiy ftumble in the Hrft
principles of religion ? Surely I would not thmke it credible, vnlefTc
their owne writinges that are abroade did teftifie it; Paule pronoun- Rom. I,
ceththat they onely are the children of God, that arc moued with '"♦•
his fpirit: and thefe men would hauethem that be the children of
Ood,to be moucd with their own fpirit,and to be without the Spirit
of God. Paule teachcth that we call God oure Father , as the holy R^"* ^»
Ghoft miniftreth that word vnto vs, which onely can bearc witnelTe * •
to our fpirite that we are the children of God : Thefe mcn,although
they forbidde vs not to call vpon God , yet do take away his Spirit,
by whofe guiding he fhould haue bene rightly called vpon.Paule de-
nieth that they are the feruantes of Chrift , that are not moiied with
the Spirit of Chrift:thcfe men fainc a Chriftianitic that needeth not
the Spirit of Chrift.Paule maketh no hope of the bleifed refurredio, Rom. ?.
vnlcflewe feele the holy Ghoft abiding in vs: they forge a hope *»•
without any fuch fcling.But peradueture they will anfwere,that they
do not deny that we ought to be endued with it , but that it is a point
of modefty & humility not to acknowledge It. What meaneth he the,
when he biddeth the Corinthians to trie whether they be in the ».Cor,
faithjio prouc thcmfelues whether they hane Chrift,whom vnlefTe a * J'^*
man do acknowledge to be dwelling in him, he is a reprobat? But by
the Spirit ihat God hath geuen vs(faith Iohn)wc know that he abi- i.Ioh.ji,
deth in vs. And what do we els but call y piomifcs of Chrift in dour, \i*
-when wc will be compted the feruantes of God without his Spirit, *' ^**
which he hath openly declared , that he woulde poure out vpon all
his? Bifidc that , we do wrong to tKe holy Ghoft , which do feparatc
£rom him faith that is his pecuhar worke. Suhe thefe are the firft
GO iiij
Cap.2. Ofthcmanerhowtorcceiuc
Icflons of godlie religion , it is a token of mifcrablc blindenedc , to
hauc Chriftnns no:ed of arrof^ancie, that dare glorie of the prefcnce
of the holy Ghoft, without which gloricng Chriitianitie it fcli'e doth
not itand.But they declare by their example hov/ truely Chrirt faide,
oh.14. that his Spirit is vnknowen to the worlde , and is onclyknowen o£
7* themwith vvhomehe abideth.
40 And bycaufe they will not go about to oucrthrowe the fted-
faftneflTc of faith with digging onely of one mine , they alTayle it alio
ocherwife. For they fay, that althoL*|h accordin;j; to our prefcnt ftatc
of righteoufneSiWemay gather a'iudgmcnt of the grace of Godjyet
the knowledj;e of perfeuerance to the cnde abideth in fufpenfe. A
goodly confidence of faluation for(bo:h is left vnio vs,if we ludge hf
moral! coniedurc, that For a prefent momenc we be in fauoure, and
loin. 8 . what Ihall become of vs to morrow we can not tell.The Apoltlc tea-
^* chech farre ctherwife : I am furely perfwaded (faith he) that neither
Angels, nor pov/eiSjnor pFincipaliiies,ncither d. ath,nor life,neithef
prefent ihrngcsnor thiogcs ro ccmejlKall feuervsfrom the louc
wherewith the Lordeembraccth vs inChrift. They feeke to efcapc
with a trifling folution.pratinf^c that the Apoftle had that by fpeciall
reueiation.Biit they are holde ro hard to ilippe away fo.For there he
entreatcth of thofe good thinges thatcommonely come by faith to
the faithfull, not thole that he himfelfefpecially feleth. But the fame
o tz, ^'^"^ ^^ ^" other place pntteth vs in feare with mentio of our wcake-
nefle and vniicdtaftnes : Let him that ftandeth (faith he) beware thac
he fall nof.lt is true,but not fuch a feare whcrby we Inoulde be ouer-
throwen , but whereby we may learne to humble our (elues vnder
Per. 5. the mighty hand of God, as Peter expoundeth it. Then how againft
ordre and truth is it to hmite the afTurednes of faith to a moment of
time , whofe propretie is ro pafTe beyond the fpaces of this life , and
extend further toimmortaliticto come ? Sith therefore the faithfull'
do impute it to the grace of God , that being lightncd with his fpirii
they do by faith enioy the beholdmg of y heauenly liferfo far is luch
glorying from prcfumpiuoufnelfe , that if any man be afliamedto
confeffe it , he doth therein more bewray his extreme vnthankefuU
neflc , in vnkjndcly hiding Gods goodncs , than he doth declare his
modcftieor lubmilTion, j
41 Becaufe it fcmcd y the nature of faith could not otherwifc bet**
tcr or more plainly be declared than by the fubftance of the promife
vpon which it reftcih as vpon her propre foundation ,ro that if the
proinife be taken 3way,faith by and by falleth downe or rather vani-i
iheth away .-therefore we tokc our definition from thenfe, which y^
varicth
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 257
▼aricth not from that definition , or rather defcription of the Apo-
ftle , that he applieth to his dilcourfc , where he (ayth that fayth is a Hcim
fubftance oifthinges to be hoped tor,& a certainty of things that arc
DOC feene.For by this worde Hypoftafis fubllancc(for that tcrmc he
vfeth)he meaneth as it wcre,an vpholding ftay,whereupon the god-
ly minde leaneth & refteth. As if he fhduld fay f faith is a certaine &
affared poffciiion of thofe things that are promifed vs of GodjVnIcfic
a manhad rather to take HypoftaHs for affiance, which I miflikenot,
albeit 1 follow that which is more commonly rcceiued. Againe,to fi- Dan. 5
gnifie that euen ro the laft day when the bookes flialbe opened , they 10.
are hier than thofe thinges that may be perceined with ourfenfes, or
feene with our eyes, or handeled with our handes, and that the fame
are no otherwife poiTcfTed by vs, but if we go beyondc the capacity
of our owne wit, and bende our vnderftanding aboue all thinges that
are in the world, yea and climbc aboue^ur felues, he hath therefore
added that this adurednes of pofTefliOjis of thmgs that he in hope,&
therefore arc not feene.For plain e appearance (2s Paule wrytcthj is
not hope,neither hope we for thofe thinges thatwefce. And when ^°"-*
he calleth i&a certainety or proufe (or as Auguftine hath oft tranfla- ^ou{\
ted it) a coniundion of thinges nof prefentrfor ui Grcekc it is Elen* Hom.i
choSjhe fayth afmuch as if he did fay , that ins an euident fliewing of lohan.
thinges not appcarmge,a (eeinge of thinges not feenCja.pJainnefTe of 79- J^J.
daikcthing«,a prcfence of thinges abtent,an open fliewing of hidden ^n^*^*^
me
things. For the m^-fteries or Godjfuch ssxhey be thatpcrtaine to our rit. Sc
faluation,can not be fcene in themfciues and incheir owne nature as remi(T.
they call Jt:but we behold them only rn his word,ofwhofe trueth wc ^' *• ^*
ought to be fo fully perfwadedjthatwc ought ta hold all- 1 hat he fpea- ^^'
keth as it were already done andfollilled.But how can the minde lift
vp it felfe CO rcceiue fuch a tafl of Gods goodnefle , but that it muft
needes be therewith wholly kindled to loue God againe?For that flo-
wing plenty offweetcnes which God hathlayed vp m ftore for them
that fearc him,cnn not be truely knowcnisbut that it muft therewith-
al! vehemently moue afFcdion : and whofe aftedionit once moueth,
itviterly rauiflieth and carieth him beyonde himfclfer; Therefore it
is no maruclll , if into a peruerfe & crooked heart neuor cnireth thif ^ "" ^ "■
affedion, by which being conueyed vp'into the very heaucn,we arc
fuffred to come to the molt fecretely hidden treafurci of God,and the
moft facred ptiuie places of his kingdom , which may not be defiled
with the entrance of an vncleane hcil:t.^For that which the Schoole-
men teach, that charity is before faith and hope, is a meere madnes. c - j i'
Poritis faith oncly that firft engendrcth charity in vs . Howe much » 5.&
Cap. 2, Of themancrhowtoreceiuc
iT.t.in more rightly doth Bernard teachrl beleue(raith hc)thaty teftimony
nnun- of confciencc, which Paul calleth the glory of y godly, confilleth m
*"*^' three thinges.For firft of all it is neceffary to beleue y thou canft not
Cor.i haucforgiucnes of (innes,but by y pardon c^God:then y thou canft
u ■ hauc rio good worke at all,vnles he alfo giue it:laft of all y thou canft
by no works deferue eternal life,vnles it alfo be giuen fieely. A litle
after he addeth y thefe things fuffice not, but that there is a ccnainc
beginning of faith, becaufe in beleuing y (innes can not be forgiuen
but of GodjWc ought alfo to beleue y they are not forgiue vs,til alfo
we be perfwaded by y teftimony of the holy Ghoftiy faluation islayd
vp in ftore for vs : becJufc God forgiueth linnes, he himfelfe giueth
merites,& hehimfelfc alfo giueth rewards,ihatwe may not ftay ftil in
this beginning. But thefe &other things fhalbc to bt- entreated of in
places Htforthem.Nowlctit only fuffice to know what faith is.
4Z Now wherfoeuer this liuely faith fhalbe,it can not be polfible
but that it hath with it y hope of eternall faluation,as an vndiuidablc
fopanionror rather that it cngcndreth or bringeth it foorth out of it
felfe,which hope being taken away, how eloquently, glorioufly foe-
uerwe talke of faith^yet we are conuided to haue no faith at all , for
if faitli(as isaboue faid^ be an affured pcrfuafion of Gods trueth,that
it can not lye vnto vs nor decciue vs , nor become voide, then they
that haue conceiuedthis alfuredncfiejtruely do therwiihal lookc for
a time to come that God fliall pcrforme his promifes, which in their
pcrfuafion can not be but true : fo that brierely,hope is nothing elfe,
but a looking for thofc ihinges which faith hath beleued to be true-
ly promifcd of God.So faith beleueth that God is true, hope loketh
fortheperformacebf histrueihinconucnicnttime Faith beleueth
that he is our Father , hope looketh for him to fhcw himfelfe fuch a
one towardc vs . Faith beleueth that eternall life is giuen vs , hope
looketh that it be one day reuealed. Faith is the foundation where-
upon hope refteth,hopc nourilhcth Bc fuftaineth faith. For as no man
can lookc for any thing at Gods hand , but he that harh firft beleued
his promifes : fo againcthe weakentflc of our faith muft with paci*
ent hope and cxpcibtionbe fufteined and cheriflied , that it fall not
Rom.8. as fainting for. wcarineffe. For which reafon Paul doth well place our
**• faluation in hcipe;For hope, white it in filence looketh for the Lor d^
reftrayncth fitiih that it fall not headlonge with too much haft : hope
ftrcngthneth faith ,that itwauernotin Gods promifes,nor beginnc
to dout of the tructh of them : hope refrefhcth faith that it Waxe not
weary tHope ftretchetfi faith to the vttermoft bounde, that it faint not
in the middc courfe nor inxhe very beginning. Finally, hope by con-^
I tinually
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 238
tinually rcnuingc and reftoringe * it maketh it now and then to rife
Vp freflier than it fclfe to continuance . Bu: hovvc many wayes the
hclpes of hope arc neceflary to the ftrengthning of faith,(hall better
appcare, ifwcconhder with how many fortes of temptations they
arc aflailed and fliaken, that haue embraced the word of God . Firft
the Lord in differring his promifes doth oftentimes hold our mindes
longer in fufpenfe than we woulde wifh : here it is the office of hope
to pcrforme , that which the Prophet commaundeth , that though Hcb.a.|
his promifes do tary,yet we ihould waitc ftill for them. Sometime he
fufFereth vs n<^only to faint , but alfo feemeth to be highly difplea-
ft d:here jc is much more neceflary to haue hope to helpe vs,that ac-
cording 10 the faying of an other Prophet,we may ftill lookc for the p^ ^
Lord that hath hidden his face from lacob. There rife vp all fcorncrs ^y '
(as Peter fayth) that aske:where is his promife or his comming ? for- i.Pe.},
afmuch as fince the fathers flept, all thinges fo continue from the be- 4^
ginninge of the creation. Yea the flcfh and the world do whiCpcr the
feme thing in our eares.Here muft faith ftaied with fufFerace of hope Pfa.po,
be hoidenfaft fixed m beholdmge of eternity that it may accompt a 4-
thoufand yeares hke as one day.
45 For this conioyning and alliance the Scripture fomtimcs con-
foimdeth the names of Faith and Hope . For when Peter teacheth , p^^ ,
that we are by the power of God preferued through faith, vnto the ».
difdofing of faluation, he giucth that vnto faith which did more fitly i.Pe-i.j
agree with hope,and not without caufe, forafmuch as we haue alrea-
dy taught, that hope is nothing elfe but theiiounrhment and ftrcngth
of faith . Sometimes they are loyncd rogethcr:as in the fame epiftle.
That your faith and hope fhould be in God. But Paule to the Phihp-'p, ..
pians out of faith dcriuethexpc(9;ation,becaufe in pacicntly hoping, ^^^ " '
wc holde our defires in fufpenfe, til Gods conoicnient opoitunity be
opened . All which matter we may better vnderftande by the tenth
chapter to the Hcbrues, which I haue already allcaged.Paule in an Ga, cj,
other place , although he fpeake vnpropcrly , yet meaneth the fame
thing in thcfe wordes : We looke in the fpirit through faith for hope
ofrighteoufneflc, cuen bccaufcwe embracing the teftimonicof the
Gofpell concerninge his free loue,do Jooke for the time when God
fhal openly (hew that which is now hidden vnder hope. And now it is
plaine how fooliflily Peter Lomberd laieth two foundations of hope
that is the grace of God,& the defcruinge of woikes. Hope can haue
no other marke to bedireded vnto,but faithrand we haue already de-
clared that faith hath one only markc the mercy of God, to which it
ought to lookc (as I may (o fpeakc) with both eyes. Bui it is good to
Cap.g . Of the mancr how to receiuc
hcarc what a Iruely reafon lie bringeth. If (fayth he)thou darft hope
^ for any thing without deferuingeSjV fliall not be worthy to be called
liopCjbut prefumprio.Who (gentle reader) wil not worthdy abhorrc
fuch beailes , that fay , it is a rafh and prefumpteous deede , if a man
hauc confidence that God is true of his worde? For where the Lordc
villcth vs to looke for all thinges at his goodncfle, they fay it is pre-
fumption to leane and reft vpon it. A maifter meete for fuch fcholers
as hefounde in the mad fchoole of filthy bablers.But as for vs,whcn
we fee that we are commaunded by the oracles of God to conceiue
a hope of faluation,let vs gladly prefumc fo much vpon his trueth,as
rrufting vpon his only mercy, cafting away the confidence ofworks.
Matt. 5. ^^ ^^ ^^^^ ^° ^°P^ well.He will not dcceiuc that faid: Be it vnto you
X2. according to your faith.
Tfic iij. Chapter.
That we ate regener Ate}}) faith, Wherein is entreatei of^pentanct,
ALbeitwe haue already partely taught howe faith poffefleth
Chrift, and howe by it we enioy his benefitesrneuer theleflfc
this were yet darkc , vnlelTe we did alfo make declaration' of
the effedes that we feele rherby.Not without caufe it is laid,
thar the fum of the Gofpell ftandeth m repentance and in forgiue-
neflc offinnes. Therefore leaiunge outthefe two poinres,whatfoe-
uer v/c fhall fay of faithjfhalbe but a hungry & vnperFed,yea and in
manner vnprdfitablc difputation of faith. Now forafmuch as Chrift
doth giue both vnco vs, and we obtaine both by faith, that is to fay,
both newneflc of life and free reconciliation , reafon and order of
teaching requireth, that in this place I begin to fpeake of both. Our
next palfage from faith (halbc to Repentance, becaufe whe this ar-
ticle is well pcrceiued,it fliall the better appearc how m.in is iuftified
by only faith and mere pardon, & yet how reall holinefle of life(as I
may fo callit)isnotfeuered from free imputation ofrightcoufncfTe.
Now it ought to be out of queftionjthat Repentance doth not onely
\ immcdiatly follow faith,but alfo fpring out of it. For whereas pardon
and forgiuenes is thcrfore off^ed by the preachingc of the Gofpell,
that the finner beinge deliuered fr^m the tyranny of Satan , from the
yoke of finne, and from miferable bondage of vices , may pafle into
the kingdom of God , truely no man can embrace the grace of the
Gofpell, but he muft returne from the errours of his former life in-
to the right way, and apply all his ftudy to the meditation of repen-
tance . As for thera that thinkc that repentance doth rather go be-
fore
Thegrace of Chrrft. Lib,3. 239
jfbrc faith d:an now or fpring foorch of it^as a frutc out of a crcc,thc]r
neuer knewe the force thcrof , and are moucd with too weake an ar-
gument CO thinke fo.
X Chrift (fay they) and lohn in their prcachinges do firft exhortc
the people to repentance , & then they aftcrward/ay that the king- Mat. i.
dom of heauenis at handc . Such commaundemcntto preach , the a.
Apoftles recciued> fuch order Paule followed, as Luke reportcth. Bur '^^•J 7
while they fuperftitioufly ftickc vpon the ioyningc together of lilla- ^ ' ^^
at.
bleSjthey marke not in what meaning the wordes hang together. For
when the Lorde Chrift and lohn do preach in tliis manner: Repent
ye,for the kingdomc of heauen is come neare at handc: do they not
fetchc the caufe of repentance from very grace and promife of falua-
tion^Therefore their wordes are afmuch in effed as if they had faid;
becaufc the kingdome of hf aucn is come nerc at hand, therefore re-
pent ye.For Matthew, when he hath (hewed that lohn fo preached,
faith that in him was fulfilled the prophccic of Efay , concerning the ^^
voice crying in the wildernefle. Prepare the way of the Lorde , make J.
fti eight the pathes of our God.But in the Prophet that voice is com-
maunded to beginnc it comfort and glad tidmges. Yet when we re-
feree the beginninge of repentance to faith, we do not dreame a cer-
taine meane fpace of time, wherein it bringtth it out : but we meane
to {hewe that a man can not earneftly apply himfelfc to repentance,
vnlcffe he know himfelfc to be of God. But no man is trucly perfwa-
ded that he is of God , bathe that hath firft receiued his grace . But
tbefe thinges {halbe more plaincly difculfed in the proccfTe following.
Paraducnture this deceiued them , that many are firft by terroures of
confcience tamed; or framed to obedience, before that they hauc
throughly difgefted, yea before thcyhaue taftedihe knowledge of
grace. And this is the feare at the beginning,which fome accompt a- n
mong vertuss, becaufe they fee that it is nere to true and iuft obedi-
ence. Burourqueftion isnothcre howdiuerfely Chrift drawcthvs
vnto him, or prepareth vs to the endeuour of godlinefle ; only this I
fay, that there can be no vprightneflc founde where reigneth not
that Spirite which Chrift receiued to communicate the fame to his
members.Then according to that faying of the Pfalme.With thee is p^ ^
mercifulnefle,that thou maycft be feared. No man (hall euer rcuerent ./*'^
ly feare God, buthethattrufteth that God is mcrcifull vnto him:no
roan will wiUingly prepare himfelfe to the keeping of the law, but he
that is perfwaded that his feruices pleafc him : which tendernefie in
pardoninge and bearingewithfaultes, is a (igne of fatherly fauour.
Which is alfo (hewed by that exhortation of Ofec, Come,icc vs re- ^^^^*
Gap.3 . Or the maner how to rcceiuc
not without hope > and yec faith and liope are diucrfe thingcs rfo re-
pentance and faith, although they hang together with one perpeto- .
all bond, yet they rather would be conioyned than confounded. And
trucly I am not tgnoranc,that vnder the name of repentance is com-
prehended the whole turning vnto God,whereof faith is not the leaft
parte : but in what mcaningc ir is fo comprehended , lliall mol^ eafily
appearc when the force and nature therof Ihalbe declarcd.The name
of repentance in Hebrue isderiped ofconucrtinge or returnjnge, in
Greke of chaunging of the minde or purpofe,& the thingic fclfe doth
not ill agree with cither deriuations > whereof the fumme is , that we
departmgfrom ourfelucs fhould turne vnto God,& puttinge of our
old minde,{hould put on a new. Wherefore in my iudgement,repen-
tancc may thus not amifle be defined : that it is a true turninge of our
"*. life vnto God,proceeding from a pure & earncft feare of God,wbich
conliileth in the mortifying of the fleili and of the olde man , and in
the quickening of the fpirite.In this fcnfe are to be taken all the prea-
chings wherin cither the Prophets in olde time,or the ApolUes after-
ward exhorted the men of their time to repentance . For tlus onely
rhinge they trauailed to perfwade , that confounded with their owne
(innes, and pricked with feare of the Lordesiudgement, they flioulde
fall downe and be humbled before him , againft whom they had of-
iiat. 3. fended,and with true amendementreturne into his right way. Ther-
*\ fore thcfc wordes,To be turned or returnc vnto the Iord>To repent,
or do penance , are among them vfcd without difterence in all one fi-
gnification. And therefore alfo the holy hiftoiy faith, that men repent
after the Lorde , when they that liucd wantonly in their owne luftes,
not regardinge him, do beginne to follow his wordc, and are ready at
luc.^.S their captaincs commaudement to go whether he callcth them. And
aS^ tf lohn and Paule vfed thefe wordcs, to bring forth frutes worthy of re-
jo, pcntance^for, to leade fuch a life as may reprefent and leftifie fuch an
amendement in all their doings.
6 But before we go any furthcr.it (lialbc profitable that we do
more plainly fet out at large the definitio that we haue madc.Wher-
in there be chiefely three pointes to be confidcred.Firft when we cal
it a turning of hfc vnto God,we require a transforming,notontly in
outward woikes , but al(o m the foule it felfe, which when it hath put
of her oldnefle, then beginneth to bring foor th the frutes of workes
Exc.i 8. agreeable to her renuinge.VVhich when the Prophet goeth about to
i»' exprcGcjhe commaundeth them whomc hccalleth torepentance,io
make them a newe heart . Therefore Mofes oftentimes meaningc to
(hew how the Ifraclites might repent , and fo be rightly turned vnto
the
The grace of Chrift. 1^10.3 . 241
the Lorde, teacheth that ii be done with all their heart, and with all
their roule(vvhich maner of fpeakinge wc fee often repeated of the
Prophets) and naming it the circumcifing of the heart,he fliakcth a-
way all inward aftedions. But there is no place whereby a man may
better perceiue what is the naturall propriety of repentance iha the
fourth Chapter ofleicmie.Ifthoureturne to me,0 Ilras]j(faiththe Ier,4.
Lord ) rcturne to me, plovve vp your arable lande and fow not vpori
thornes.Be circumcifcd to the Lord, and take av/ay the vncircumci-
fed skmnes of your heartcs. See how he pronounceth that they fhall
nothmgpreuaile in taking vpo the the following of righteoufnesjvn-
1 elfe wickednes be lirft plucked out of the bottome of their heartes.
And to moue them throughly , he warneth them that they haue to
do with God, with whom there is nothing gotten by dalyingibecaufe
he hateth a double heart.Therfore Efay laugheth to fcorne y fooliili ^* ^
endeuours of hipocritcs , which did in deede bulily go about an out-
ward repentance in ceremonies , but m the meane time they had no
care to loofe the bundles of wickednes wherwith they helde poorc
men fall tied. Where alfo he very well Ihewcth in what dueties vn-
fained repentance properly ft jndeth.
7 The fecond point was, that we taught that repentance procee-
deth of an earncft feare of God. For,before that the mind of a finner
be enchned to repentance , it muft be ftirred vp with thinkinge vpon
the iudgementofGod. But when this thought is once throughly
feitled,that God will one day go vp into his ludgcment feate, to re-
quire an accompt of all fayings & domgs.it will not fuffer the (ily ma
to reft, nor to take breath one mmutc of timejbut cotinually ftirreth
him vp to thinke vpon a new trade of life,whereby he may fafely ap-
pcare at that ludgement. Therefore oftentimes the Scripture, when
it exhorteth to repentancejmakech mention of the iudgemcni:as in
leremiedeaft paraduenture my wrath go out as fire,& there be none j^ta.*,
to quench it,becaufe of the naughtines of your works.In Paules fer- Aft. ij
mon to the Athenians: And whereas hitherto God hath borne with 50.
the times of this ignorance , now he giueth warninge to men,that all
me euery where may repent them, becaufe he hath apointed the day
wherein he williudge the world in equity. And in many other places.
Sometime it declareth by the puniflimentes already extended.that
God is a iudge,that finners ftiould thinke with thefelues, that worfc
thinges hang ouer them if they do not repent in time. You haue an
example therof in the 2,9. of Exodus.But becaufe the turning begin-
neth at the abhorring and hatred of finnc, therfore the Apoftle ma- ».Cor.j
keth forowfulnciTejfuchas is according to God^the caufe of repcn- lo,
HH
Cap. 3- Ofthemanerhowtoreceiae
tance. And he calleth forrowfulnes according to God, when wc are
not only afraid of punilhrnent, but do hate and abhorre finne it felfe,
forafmuch as we vndcrftand that it difpleafeth God. And no maruel.
For vnlefle we bcfharply pricked,the flouthfulnes of ourfiefh could
not be corre(^cd , yea prickinges would not fuffice fer the dulnes &
flouthfulnes therofjvnitfle Godinftretchingout his roddes Ihould
pearcemo.'edepely.Thisisalfo an obftinacy which mutt be beaten
downe as it were with bcedes.Therfore the peruerfeneffe of our na-
ture enforceth God to the feucrity that he vfeth in threateninge, be*
caufe he (houlde in vaine call vs alluringly with faire fpeach while we
lie a flsepe. I recite not the teftimonies that comonly offer thefelues
to be founde. The feare of God is in an other manner alfo the be-
gtnninge of repentance . For though mans hfe were abfolutely fur-
niilied with all pointes of vertues,if it be not applied to the worfhip-
ping ofGodjit may in deede be praifed of the world, but in beanen
it (halbe meere abhomination , forafmuch as the chiefe parte of our
righteoufnefl'e is to giue God his due right and honor, wherof he is
wickedly robbed , when we bend not our felues to yeclde vsfubieift
to his gouernment.
8 Thirdly, it remaineth that we declare what is meant by this
that we (ay 5 that Repentance confifteth in two partes, that is to fay,
mortifying of the flelh,and quickening of the fpirit. ThePrpphetes
do plainely expreile it,although fomewhat fimply and grofly,accor-
Pfa. u- <^^^S ^o ^^^^ capacity of the carnall people,whcn they fayiCefle from
1 S' euiilanddogoodnes.Againe.Be wallied,becleane,take away the e-
I'fa.i. mil of your workes from mine eyes;Ccfre to do peruer{ly,learne to
*^* do wcll/eeke iudgcment,help the oppreffedj&c.For when they call
men away fra wickednes,they requirf the death of the whole flefli,
which is ftutfed full of wickednes and peruerfenes. It is in deede an
vneafie & hard thing to put of our felues , & to depart from our na-
tural difpofitio.Neither canit be thought that the flefh is throughly
deade , vnlefle all that we baue of our felues be aboliHicd. But foraf-
Rom.8. muchasall the affedion of the flefh is enemy againftGod,thefiift
4' entree to the obeying of his law, is the forfaking of our owne nature.
Afterward they exprcfl'c the renuing by the frutes that folow therof,
as rit^hteoufneSjiudgemenc & mercy. For it were not enough to do
thofe dueties riohtly , vnleffe the minde it felfe & the heart haue firft
put on the aftcdion of ri^hteoufncs,iudgement and mercy. That is
done when the fpiric of God hath fo foked in new thoughtes & afFe-
dions, our foules firft wartied with his holines,that they may rightly
be comptednew . And truely as we arc naturally turned away from
God,
ThegnceofChrift. Lib.j; 242
God, Co vnlefle the forfaking of our fclues do go before, wc can nc-
uer go toward that which is right. Therfoie we are fo oft commaun-
dcd to pur of the old manjto forfake the world & fledijfo bid our lu-
ftes fcircweljand to be rcnued in the fpirite of our minde.Moreouec
the very name of mortification doth put vs in minde how hard it is
to forget our former nature; becaufe we thereby gather that we are
not otherwife framed to the fcare of God, nor do Icarne the princi-
ples of godlinelfei but When we are violently Oaine with the worde
of the Spirit, and (b brought to nought:euen as though God (hould
pronoiice,that to haue vs to be accompted among his cbildiejchere
ncedcth a death ofall our commune nature.
«? Both thefe things do happe ^ nto vs by the partaking of Chrift.
For if we do truely communicaLC of his death, by the power thereof Ro.<f.<
our olde man is cruci(icd,& the body of linne dieth,that the corrup*
tion of our former nature may hue no more . If we be partaliers of
his rcfjrre<ftlon , by it wc are raifed vp into a newnefTe of hfe , that
may agree with the righreoufnes of God. In one word I expounde
repentance to be regeneration , which hath no other marke where-
unto it is dircdcd , but that the image of God which was by Adams
offence fowly defaced and in a maner vtcerly blotted out^may be re-
nued in vs.So the Apoftle teachech,when he fayth:but we repr efen- j.Cor.
ting the glory of God with vncouered face are transformed mto the i8.
fame imagc,out of glory into glory,as by y fpirit of the Lord. A;^aine. Ephc.^
Be ye renued in the fpirite of your minde and put on the newe man, ^^*
which is created according to God in rightcoufnes and holinelfe of
trueth. Againe in an other place:putting on the new man,which is re ' ^<^'- i*
nued after the knowledge and image of him that created him.Thcr- '°'
fore by this regeneratio wc be by the benefit of Chrift reftored into
the righteoufnes of God, from which we were falle by Adam. After i.Cor.;
which manner it pleafeth the Lord wholly to reftore all thofc whom * *•
he adopteth into the inheritance of life. And this reftoringis fulfilled
not in one moment,orone day.or oneyere,but by continualLyea &
fomctimes flow proceedinges God taketh away the corruptions of
the flefli in his eled,cleanfcth them from filthines,and confecrateth
them for temples to himfelfc , renuinge all their fenfes to true pure-
nes,that they may excrcifc thcmfclues all their life in repentance,and
Icnowe that this warre hath no ende but in death. And fo much the
greater is the lewdnes of that filthy railer & apoftata Staphilus,which
foolindy faith that I confounde the ftate of this prefcnt life with the
heauenly glory, when I expounde by Paulc the image of God to be *'^ot.
holines and true righteoufnes. As though when any thing is defined, ^
HH ij
Cap.j. Ofthe maner how to receiue
We ihoLilde not feeke the whole fulnes & perfedion of it. And yet wc
deny not place for encreafces:but I fay that how neere any man ap-
procheth to the hkenes of God , Co much the image of God fhineth
in him. That the faithfull may attaine her unto, God affigneth them
the race of repentance wherem to runne all their hfe long.
ro The children ofGod therefore are fodeUuered by regenera-
tion from the bondage of finne, not that hauinge now obtained the
full poirelTion of hberty , they fhould feele no more trouble by their
fielhjbut that they fhould haue remaining a cotinual matter of ftrife,
wherwith they may be exercifed , and not only be exercifed,but alfo
may better learne their owne weakenefTe. And in this point all wry-
tersoffounde ludgement agree together, that there remayneth in
man regenerate a feedinge of cuill,from whenfe continually fpringc
defii es that allure & ftirre him to finne. They confefl'e alfo that the
holy ones arc ftill fo holden entangled with that difeafc of luftinge,
that they can not withftand but that fomtime they are tickled & Itir-
red either to lufl: or to couetoufnes , or to ambition or to other vices.
Neither is it nedefoll to labout much in fcarching what the old wry-
Libr.ad teis haue thought herein,forafmuch as only Auguftine may be fuffi-
Bonit; 4 cient for it, which hath faithfully and with great diligence gathered al
Li.i. &2 ^1^^-^ iudgementes. Therefore let the readers gather out of him, fuch
tulia- certainety as they {hall defire to learne ofthe opinion of antiquity,
num. But there may feeme to be this difFerece betwene him and vs,that nc
when he graunteth that the faithfull fo long as they dwell in a mortall
body are fo holden bound with luftes,that they can not but luft, yet
dareth not call that difeafe finne : but being content to exprefle it by
the name of weakeneffe , he tcachcth that then onely it becommeth
iinne,when cither workc or confent is added to coceite or receiuing,
that is,when will yeeldeth to the firft defire : but wc aecompt the ve-
ry fame for finne,that man is tickled with any defire at all againft the
law of God : Yea we affirme that the very corruption that engen-
dreth fuch defines in vs ,is finne. We teach therefore that there is al-
way finne in the holy ones, vntill they be vnclothed ofthe mortall
body, becaufe there remaincth in their flefli that pcruerfcnes of lu-
Omg that fightcth againft vprightnes. And yet he doth not alway for-
Scr.<f. bearc to vfe the name of Sinne,as when he fayth: This Paule callcth
dc ver - by the name of finne,from whenfe fpring all finnes vnto a flefhly c5-
bis A- cupifcence. This afmuch as pcrtaineth to the holy ones, loofeth the
P®^^' kingdom in earth,and perifheth in hcauen.By which wordes he con-
fcfl'ethjthat the faithfull arc gilty of finne, in lo much as they are fub-
ied to the luftes ofthe flefli.
II Buc
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. ^ 243 ^
n But this that it is fay d,y God purgeth his church fro all finne,
that he promifeth that grace ofdeliuevace by B3ptirme5& fulfillech it Ephe.Ji
in his eledjWe referre rather to the giltines of finne, than to the very z6.
matter of hnne.God truely performeth this by regenerating the that
be hisjthat in ihem that kingdomc of (inne is abolifhed (for the holy
Ghoft miniftreth them ftrength,whereby they get the vpper hand &
arc coquerours in the battcl^but it ctfleth only to reignc & not fo to
dwell in them.Therfore we fo fayjthat the old man is crucified,& the Ro. 6.6.
law of finnc abolifhed in the children of God, that yet there remaine
fome leauing$,not to haue dominio in them, but to humble them by
knowledge in confcience of their owne weakenefle. And we contclTe
that the fame are not imputed , as if they were not : but we affirnie
that this Cometh to paffe by the mercy of Godjthat the holy ones are
deliuered from this giltineflejwhich othcrwife lliould iui^ly be recke-
ned hnners & gilty before God. And this fentence it Ihal not be hard
for vs to confirme,forafmuch as there are euident teftimonies of the
Scripture vpon their matter.For what woulde we haue more plainc,
than that which Paule crieth out to the Romaines cap.7. Fu ft both Rj, « g
we haue in an other place fhcwed, and Anguftine proueth by ftronge
reafonSjthat Paul there fpeaketh in the pcrfonof a man regenerate.
I fpeake not of chis,that he vfeth thefe wordes, Euill and Sinne^thac
they which will fpeake againft vs may not cauill againft thofe words?
but who can deny, that a ftriuing againft the law of God is euill? who
can deny a withftanding of luftice to be finne ? Finally, who will not
graunt that there is a fault , where is a fpirituall mifery ? But all thcfc
thinges are reported of this difeafe by Paule. Againejwe haue an aflu-
red demonftration by the law,by which this whole queflio may eafily
be difculTed.For we are commaunded to loue God with al our heart,
with all our foulejWith all our powers. Sith all the partes of our foulc
ought fo to be occupied with the loue of God,it is certainc,that they
fatisfie not the commaundement that coceiue in their heart any de-
firc>be it neuer fo litle, or fuffer any fuch thought at all to entre into
their minde,as may withdraw them from the loue of God into vani-
ty. For whatfare not thefe the powere of the foule,to be aftefted with
fodaine motions,to comprehende with wit,to conceiue with minde?
Therfore, when thefe do open a way for vainc or corrupt thoughres
to entre into th^, do they not (hew that they are euen fo much voidc
of the loue of God?Wherfore,who fo confeffeth not that all the lufts
of the flefti are finnes,aod that the fame difeafe of lufting.which they
call a feeding, is the well fpringe of finnc ».he muft needcs deny that
the tranfgteflion of the law is finne,
HH ijj
Cap.3. Of the mancr how to recciuc
I z If any man thinke it an abfurdity,that all the defire? wherwith
man is naturally moued in afFedion,are vniueifally c6demned,whcr-
as they be put into man by God the author of nature. We anfwere,
that we do not condemne thofe defires that God hath fo engrauen
into y minde of man at the firft creation,that they can not be rooted
out without deftroying the very nature of man,but onely outragious
and vnbridled motions that fight againft the ordmance of God. But
no we fith by reafon of the peruerfenefle of nature all her powers arc
infeded and corrupted, that m all her doinges appeareth a continuall
diforder & jntemperancc,bccaufe the defires can not be fcuered fro
fuch intemperancc'.therefore we fay that they are corrupt.Or(if you
like to haue the whole fumme in fewer wordes)we teach that all ihci
defires of men are euill : and we accufe them to be gilty of finne, not
in that that they are naturall.but for that they are inordinaierand we
call tliem inordmate,becaufe no pure or cleane thinge can come out
Ail B - ^^^ corrupt and vncleane nature. And Auguftine doth not fo much
nif. vary from this dodrine as he appeareth in fliew, whjle he fomcwhat
too much feareth the cnuie that the Pelagians labored to bring him
intOjhcfbmetimeforbearethtovfe the name offinne: Yet where he
wry teth thar the laW of finne fttll remaining in the holy one ^yihc on-
ly giltines is taken away,he plainly fhewcth that he dothnot fo much
difagrce from our meanmg.
I g We will allea^c (ome other fentenceSjwherby fliall better ap^
peare what he thought In the fecond booke agaiiift Iuli.;n:This law of
iJnne is both releafed by the fpiritual regeneratjon,and abideth in the
mortall flefti'releafed herein,becaufe the gilrincs is taken away in the
facrament wherby the faithfull are regener3te:& it abideth. becaufe
it worketh the defires againft which the faithfull do tight . Agayne,
Therfore the law offinne(which was alfo in the members of fo great
an Apoftle)is releafed in baptifme,but not ended. Againe.The law
of finne(of which yet rcmaininge the gilnnelfcis in baptifme difchar?
ged) Ambrofe called wickednes : becaufe it is wickedncs for the flefh
to luft againft the Spirit. Againe.Sinne is dead in refped of that gilri-
ncs wherein it helde vs,and cuen being dead,it ftiU rebelleth till it be
healed with perfedion of buriall. And yet pbyncr in the ^. booke. As
the blindnefle of heart is both a finne,whereby man beleueth not in
God:andalfo apunifhmetof finne, whereby a proud heart ischafti-
fcd with worthy corred;ion:and the caufe of finne when anything is
committed by the errour of a blinde heart : fo the luft of flerti againft
which a good fpirit lufteth, is bo'h finne , becaufe there is in it difo*
bedience againft the goucrnment of the nunde:and alfo the punifhr
\ii i u i «ncnt
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 244
ment of finnCjbccaufe it is giuen for recompeiUc to the deferumges
of the difobedient : and the caufe of iinn<? in man, when he confen-
teth by defedion or in man , when he is borne : by infection . Here
without any doutfall fpeach he caileth it hnnCjbccaufe when errour
was once ouerthrowen > and the trueth confirmed , he lefle feared
(claunderous reportes. As in the 4i.Homcly vpon lohn, where dout-
leffe he fpeaketh accordmge to the true meaninge of his minde, he
fayth .* If in the flefh thou ferue the lawe of finne,do that which the Rom.tf.
Apoftlc himfelfe faithdct not finne reigne in your mortal.body to o- 1 2.
bey the defires thcrof He faiih noc,let it not be,but let it not reigne.
So long as thou liueft , finne muft needes be in thy members at leaft
let reigne be take from it.Let not that be done which it commaun-
deth.They that d^rfende that luft is no finne, are wont to obicd thai?
faying oflames:Luft,after that it hath coceiued.bringeth forth linne. lam. 2.
But this is eafily cofjted. For vnlefle we thinke that he fpeaketh of
only ill workcs or aduall finneSjCuill wil it felfejfball not be accomp-
ted finne. But where he callcth mifchieuous deedes and wicked offen-
fes the offprings of finne,and giueth vnto them the name of finne, ic
doth not byandby folow thereof, but that to luft , is an euiU thing &
damnable before God.
• 14 Certaine Anabaptiftes in this age,deuife I wote not what phre
tike intemperance in tteede of fpiritual regensration:faying that the
children of God reftored into the ftate of innocency , now ought no
rnore to be carefuU for bridling of the luft of the flcdi: that the Spirit
is to be followed for their guide,vnder whofe guiding they neuer go
out of the way . It were incredible that mans minde coulde fall to fo
great madneflc, vnlefle they did openly and proudly babble abroadc
this dodrine.Truely it is monftruous.But it is meete that fuch fhould
fufter the punifhment of fuch blafphemous boldenelTe, that fo haue
perfwadcd their minde to turne the trueth of God into a he. Shall all
the choife of honefty and di(honefty,right and wrong, good & euill,
vertue and vicejbe taken away ? Such difference (fay they) commeth
of the curfednefle ofoldeAdam, from which we are exempted by
Chrift. So now there fhalbe no difference betwene fornication and
chaftityjplaine dealinge and futteltyjtrueth and lying, iuftice and ex-
tortion. Take away vaine fearejfay they,thc Spirite wil commaunde-
thee no euill thinge , fo that thou boldely and without feare yeelde
thee to the guidinge thereof Who can choofe but be aftonifiied at
ihefe monftruous thinges?Yet it is a common learning among them,
which blinded with madneffe of luftes , haue putte of all common
rcafon, but what Chrift (I befeech you) do they frame vnto vs , and"
HH iiij
Cap.3 . Of the maner how to receiuc
what fpiiit do they belch out?For we reknowledge pne Chrift,& his
only Spirit whom the Prophets hauc c5mencled, whom the Gofpell
giuen vs doth preach,of whom we there heare nofuch chinge. That
Spirit is no patrone of manflaughter,whoiedom,dronkennes,pride>
contentionjcouetoufnes, & guile ;but the author of loue,chaftity,ro-
briery ,modeftyjpeacc,temperance Sc truth.lt is not a giddy rpirir,&
runneth headlong without confideration through right and wronge,
but is full of wifdom and vndetlbndinge,that difcemerh rightly be-
twene iuft and vniuft . It ihneth not vnto diflokue and vnbridkd li-
centioufnefTejbut maketh difference betwenc lawfull and vnlawfull,
and teacheth to kepe meafore and cemperance:but why do we labour
any longer in confuting this beaftly rage? To Chr iftians the Spirit of
the Lord is not a troublefome phantaiie, which cither thefelues haue
brought forth in a drcame, or haue recciued being forged of other;
but they reuerently fecke the knowledge of him at the Scriptures,
where thefe two things be taught of him:Firft that he is giaen vs vn-
to fandification,th.it he might bringe vs into the obedience of Gods
wiiljbeing purged from vncleannefle and defilingcSj which obedience
can not ftande,vnle0e luftes be tamed and fubdued^whereunto thefe
men would giue the bridle at liberty.Secondly we are taught thai wc
are fo cleanfed by his fandificationjthat we are Ihl befiegcd with ma-
ny vices and much weakenes/o long as we are enclofed in the burden
of our body:wherby it commeth to paiTe, th.u being farre diftant fro
perfcdion,wc haue neede alway to encreafe fomwhat,3nd being en-
tangled in vicesjwe haue nccdc daily to wraftle with them. Whereu-
pon alfo followeth > that ihaking of flouth and carelefnelle , we muft
watch with heedefuU mindcs, that we be not compafled vnware with
the fnares of our flelh. Vnlefle paraduenture wc thinke that we haue
proceeded further tha the x^poftle,which yet was weried of the An-
gel of Satan , that his ftrcngth might be made perfed with weakenes:
Ko.y.6. and which did vnfainedly reprefcnt inhisfiefli that diuih'on of the
fielli and of the fpirir.
I Cor 7 ' ^ ^"^ whereas the Apoftle in defcribing of repentance reckencrh
ii. feauen either cau(es or effedes or partes thereofjhe doth that of a ve-
ry good caufe:and thefe they be.endeuour or carefulnefle , excufinge,
indignationjfeare,defirejZcle,puniflimcnt. Neither ought it to feenie
any abfui dity , that I dare not certainely determine whether they
ought to be compred caufes or cft'edes. For both may be defended in
difputation . They may be alfo called aftedions ioyned with repcn*
iance:but becaufe,leauinge out thofe queftions,we may vnderftande
what Paule meaneth , we (halbe content with a (imple declaration
of
2,Cor,
1 ne grace on^nriit. 1.0.'^. 245
of them.He faith chcrcforejthat of the heauinclle which is according
to God,arifeth carefulnclle. For he that is touched with an earneft
fthng ot difpltralure bycaufe he hath finned againft his God,is ther-
withall ftirred vp to dihgence and heedefuhiclfe , to winde himfelfc
derely out of the inares of the Deuell, to take better heedr of his
fnares , to fail no more from the gouernance of the holy Ghoft, not
to be opprellcd with fecurity.Next is Excufing, which in this place fi-
gnifieth not the defcnfe , whereby a finner to efcape the iudgemenc
of God,cither doth denie that he hath otfended, or dimmiiheth the
haynoufnefle of his faulte, bur a purgation which ftandeth rather in
crauing of pardon , than in dcfenfe of his caufe. Ljke as tiie children
that are not reprobate when they acknowledge and confeflfe their
faultes,do yet vfe entreating, and that it may take place, they proteft
byallmeanes that they can, that they haue not caft away the reue-
rencethat they owe to their parentes.Finally they foexcufe thcm,as
they go not about to proue themfelues righteous and innocent , but
onely that they may obteine pardon . Then foUoweuh Indignation,
whereby the linnerfretteih uiwaidly with himfcife, quareleth with
himlelfe ,is.4P^ry vyuhhimfelfe • whenherecordeth hisowne per-
uerfnefle and his owne vnthankefulnefle to God. By the name of
feare , he me-neth that trembhrig that is ftiiken into our mindes fo
ofte as vvethmk6bckh what we haue dcferued , and howe homble is
the feueritie' of Gods wrath againft fmners.For we muff needes then
be vexed vyitha nriarueUous vnquietnefle , which both inftrudeth v$
^o humilitie5& niaketh vs more ware againft the time to come. Nov?
if outof feared&fpri'ngeihatcarefulnclTc, whereof he had fpoken
before, then we fee with whaUmkipgith^y hang together. It femeth
to me that he hath vfed this worde Defire for diligence in our dutic
and redy cherefulneiTq to obey , whereunto, the acknowledginge of
our owne faultesou^ht chiefely topiouokevs. And thereunto alio
belongeth zele, which he ioyneth immediatly next vnro it. Foi- it fi •
gnifieth a feAientnefle^vyherewith we be kindled when we be fpurred
forward with thefc pricking thoughtes : what haue I done ? whether
had I throwen my felfe hcdlonge , if the mercie of God did not help
me ? The laft of all is punifhment , for the more rigorous that wc be
to our felucs,and the ftreightlier that we examine our owne finnesjo
much the rnore we ought to truft that God is fauorable and merci?
full vntovs, Andtruely itis not poftible ,. but that the foulebein^y
ftriken with horrourof the iudgementof God muft needes do fomc
execution in the punifhing of it felfc. Truely the godly do fele what
puniftimentes are fhame,coni\ifion,n:^ourDing,Jo thing of themfelues.
Cap.j. Ot the mancr how to receiue
& other afte£ii6s that fpring out of carneft acknowledging of finnes;
But let vs remember that there is a meafure to be kepte,tliat forrow
do not fwallowe vs vp , becaufe nothing moreredilyhappeneth to
fcarefull confciences than falling to defpeire. And alio by that crafty
meanc whom fo euer Sata findeth ouerthrowen with dreade of God,
be more and more drowncth them in the gulfe of forrow, that they
may neuer rife vp againe.Truely the feare can not be to great which
cndeth with humjlicie , and departeth not from hope of pardon. But
cb.ti. alway (as the Apoftle teacbeth) the finner muft beware , that while
he moue himfelfe to the lothing of himfclfe,he defpeire not,oppref-
fcd with to great feare , for fo do we flee away from God which cal*
•n»o- leth vs to him by repentance. Vpon which point this ieflbn of Ber-
: ii.in narde is very profitable : Sorrow for /innes is neccflarie , if it be not
*ot» continuall. I counfell you fometimc to returne your faute from gre-
uous and painefull remembrance of your owne waycs,and to climbe
vp to the plaine grounde of cherefull remembrance of benefites of
God.Ler vs mingle hony with wormewood, that the holfome bitter-
nelfe may bring vs health, when ic fhalbe dronkc tempered with
fwetenelfe. And if ye thinke of your felues in humiiitic, thinkc alfo
ofthcLorde ingoodnelfe. '
16 Now it may be alfo percciued what be the frutes of repcntace,
euen the duties of godlineflfc toward God , and of charitie toward
men,and therewithal! a holmes and purenefle in all our life. Finally,
the more eaineftly that any man examineih his life by the rule of
Gods lawe/o much the furer tokens he fheweth of his repentance.
Therefore the holy Ghoft oftentimes , when he exhortcth vs to re-
pentance , calleth vs fomeiime to all the commaundemenres of the
law,fometime to the duties of the fecond table. Albeit in other places
after that he hath condemned vndeanneflc in the very founraine of
the heartjhe defcendeth afterwardc to outwarde teftimonies that do
fet out true repcntacerof which thing I will hereafter fet before the
readers eyes a table in the defcription of a Chrilhan life. 1 will not
gather teftimonies out of the Prophets,wherein they partely fcornb
at their follies that go about to appeafe God with ceremonies , & do
fhewc that they be mere mockeries , and partdy do teache that out-
warde Vprightncfle of life is nor the principall part of repentance^
bycaufe God lokethvpon the heart; who foeuer is euen meanely
cxercifed in y fcripture , ihall perceiue of himfelfe without any other
mans putting in minde, that when we haue to do with God , we la-
Pgl J bour in vaine,vnlefl"e we beginne at the inward affedion of the hearr.
J. ' And the place of loel (hall not a litle helpe to the vndcrftanding of
the
The grace ot Chrift. Lib.3 . 246
tlic rcfte, where he inith;Teare your heartes and not your garmets.
i\lfo both ihofe pointes are exprelfedin thefe woides of lames: Ye Iac.4«
wicked doers, cleanfe your handcs : ye double nien,purge your hear-
tes. Wherein deede there is an addition ioyned to the fiift part, but
after is> fhewed the very fountainc and beginning that they muft wipe
away their fecret filthinefle,that there may be an altar fet vp to God
in the very heart. Bifide this there are alfo certaine outward exerci-
ses which we vfe priuately as remedies to humble our felues or to
tame our fielli,and publikcly for the declaration of repfntance. And
they precede from that punifhment of wh:ch Paule fpeaketh ,for * Cor.
thefe are the proprcties of anafflided minde , to be in lothefom- '• **•
nefle, mourning and weping,to flee gorgeoufneffe and all trimming,
Qnd X.O fo'iake al delires. Then he that feleth how great an euell is
the rebellion of the flclh, fekcth all remedies to bridle it. Morcoucr
he that well bethinketh him how greuous a thing it is to haue offen-
ded the luftice of God , can not reft vntill he haue in his owne hu-
mility geuen glorie to God.Such cxercifes the olde writers do often-
times rehearfe , when they fpeake of the frutes of repentance. But
albeit they do not place the whole force of repjcntance in them , yet
the readers fhill pardon ms,if 1 fpeake what I thinkerit feemeth vnto
me that they Itand to much vpon them. And if any man will wifely
Wey It, I truft he will agree with me, that they haue two wayes gone
beyond meafurc. For v/he they fo much ci!forced,and with immefu-
rable CO nmeadauons aduaunced that bodily difcipline.this in deede
they obteined , that the people did the more earnejlly embrace it,
but they in a manner darkened that , which ought to haue bene of
much greater importance. Secondcly , in geuing punilhmentes they
were fomewhat more rigorous than eedeliafticall mildenefle may
beare,3s we ihall h.iue occalion tofliew in an other place.
17 Butbecaufc many when they heare weping-.faftmgandafhes
fpoken of, both often ii^ otfier places and fpecially in loeljthey mea- loci. 2.
fiire the chiefe part of repentance by fafting and weping : there- ii*
fore their errour is to be taken away. That which is there fpoken of
the turning of the whole heart to the Lorde , of cutting their hear-
tes and not their garmentes, is proprely belonging to repentances
but weping and fafting are not ioyned as continuallorneccflary ef-
fedes thereof,but are fpoken of in refpedof a fpeciall circumftance.
Becaufe he had prophecied.that there haged ouer the lewes a moft
greuous deftrucftion , therefore he counfclleth them fo preuent the
-wrath of God , not only in repenting, but alfo in vrtering tokens of
their forrow. For as a man fianding to be arrained,vfeth humbly to
Cap.j^ Of the maner how to receiuc
abace himfelfe withanouergrowen bearde,vncombed heareand
blacke apparell,to moue the iudge to piticifo it behoued them when
they ftode accufed before the iudgement featc of God , in piteous
array to befech him not to extend his rigour.Buc although arfies and
fackcloth did paraduenturc more fitly agree with thole times. Yet it
is certaine , that weping and fafting {houldc be to a very conuenient
good vfe among vSjfo oft as the Lord femeth to threaten vs any pla-
gue or calamiticFor when he maketh any danger to apperc, he doth
after a certaine maner geue warning, that he is prepared or armed to
reuenge.Therefore the prophet did wel,when he exhorted his con-
trimen to wepinge and fafting,that is to the forrowfull manner of ac*
cufed men,whofe offences he faid a iitle before, were had in examina*
tion.Euen as the Paftors of the Church (hould not do ill at this day,
if when they fee any ruine hanging ouer the neckes of their people,
they would eric out vpon them to make haft to fafting and weping:
fo that they would with greater and more inward care and diligence,
alway enforce that which is the principall point, that they muft cut
their heartes and not their garmentes. It is out of doubt , that fafting
is not alway ioyned with repentance , but is appointed pecuharly for
times of miferable plagues:and therfore Chrift ioyncth it with way-
Matt.^, ling, when he acquiteth the Apoftles from neede thereof, vntill the
>5» time that being fpoiled of his prefence , they ftiould be tormented
with griefe. I fpeake of folene fafting. For the priuate hfe of the godly
ought to be tempered with honeft fparing and fobrietie , that in the
whole courfe thereof there may appcre a certaine kinde of fafting.
But becaule all this matter fhalbe to be declared againe in the place
where we (hall cntreate of the difcipline of the Church , therefore I
do now the more fclenderly touche it. But this one thing I wih addc
here by the way: when the name of repentance is applied to thisoui^
ward profeffion, then it is vnproprely turned from the naturall mea-
ning whichi haue aboue fet forth of it. For it is not fo much a turning
vnto God as a confeffion of fault, witha befechingof Godnot to
Mat.i I. charge them with the paine and giltinefle.So to do penance in afties
* '* and fackcloth is nothing cls,than to vttcr a difpleafednefle when God
- "^* ^ * is angry with vs for greuous offenfes. And this is a publike kinde of
confeffion , whereby we condemning our fclues before the Angels
f.Cor. and the world, do preuent the iudgement of God. For Paule rebuking
11. 3. their flouthfulneffe that tenderly beare with their own faultes, faith:
if we did iudge our fclucs ,we lliould not be iudged of God. But it is
not alway nccelfarie to make men openly ofcounfell andwitnelfcs
of out repentance ; but 50 confeftcpnuately to God is a part of true
repent-
The grace of Chrift. Lib.jJ . 247
repentance which can not be omitted. For there is nothing more
vnreafonable than to loke to haue God to pardon vs the finnes in
which we flatter our felues and do hide them by Hipocrifie, leaft he
{hould bring them to hght. And it behoueih vs not onely to confefTc
thofe finnes which wedayely commit, but moregreuous ofFenfes
ought to drawe vs further, and to call againe into our remembrance
thinges that feeme longe ago buried.Which lefTon Daliid geueth vs ^^^* J'«
byhjs example. For being touched withfhameofhis newly com- ^*
mitted fault,he examineth himfelf euen to the time when he was in
his mothers wombdand cofefleth that euen then he was corrupted
and infeded with the filthinefTe of the fleih.And this he doth not to
diminiiK the haynoufnelTeof his fauJt, as many hide themfelues in
the multitude,and feke to efcape punifhment by wrapping other with
ihem. But Dauid doth far otherwife which with fimple plainnes en-
forceth his fault in faying , that being corrupt from his firft infancie,
he hath not ccfTed to heape euels vpon euels. Alfb in an other place Pfa.2j^
he likewife fo examineth his paffed life , that he craueth the mercic 9*
of God for the finnes of his youth . And truely then onely fhall we
proue our drowfines to be (hake away from vs,if groning vnder our
burden and bewailing our euels , we af ke reliefe of God. tt is more-
ouer to be noted , that the repentance which we are commaunded
continually to applie, differeth from that repentance , that lifteth vp
as it were , from death them that either haue filthily fallen , or witti
vnbridled hcentioufncfl'e haue throwen forth themfelues to finne,
or after a certainc manner of rebellious reuolting,haue fhaken of the
yoke of God.For the Scripture oftentinKS,when it exhortcth to re-
pentancejmeaneth thereby as it were a paflage or rifing againe from
death into iife:and when it reherfeth that the people did penaunce,
it meaneth that they were turned from their idolatrie & other grofle
offences. And in like manner Paule threateneth mourning vnto fin- J. Cor,
ners that haue not done penance for their wantonneflfe , fornication i^* •»
and vnchalhtie.This difference is to be dihgently marked, leaft while
we heare that few are called to penace.a more than carelefle afliired-
nefle {hould crepe vpon vs,as though the mortifieng of the ffelli did
no more belong vnto vs , the care whereof, the corrupt defires that
alway tickle vs, and the vices that commonly budde vp in vs, do not
fufter vs to releafe,Therefore the fpeciall repentance which is rcqui-
red but of fomc,wmho the Deuell hath violently carried away from
the feare of God, and faft bound with damnable fnares,taketh not
away the ordinary repentance which the corruptnelfe of nature com-
pelleth vs to applic chroughout all the whole courfe of our life.
Cap.3. ... Of the manerhow to receiue
19 Now if that be true , which is molt euidencly cercaine , that
all the fumme of the Gofpell is contcincd inthefe two princi pall
pointes, Repentance and forgeuenefle of finnes:do we not fee^thac
the Lord doth therfore freely iuftiHe the tlut be his,that he may alio
by the fandification of his Spirite reftore tlieni into true righteouf-
Mac.ii nelfe ? lohn the Angel fcnt before the face of Chritt to prepare his
M t ? 1 w^y^s » preached : Repent ye , for the kingdome of heauen is come
nere at hande.In calling the to repentance,he did put them in mMidc
to acknowledge themfelues finners , and all that was theirs , to be
damnable before the Lorde , that they might with all their heartes
defire the mortifieng of their fltfh and a newe regeneration in the
Spirit. In telling them of the kingdome of God , he called them to
faith. Forby the kingdome of God which he taught to be at hand,
he meant forgeuenefle of finnes,faluation,and hfe,and all that euer
Mac« 4. wegetinChnft.Whereforeintheother Euangeliftesit is written,
Luc 3.3 John cam preaching the Baptifme of repentance vnto forgeuenefle
of finnes. And what is that els , but that they being oppreiled and
weried with the burden of finne.s,fliold lurne to the Lorde, and con*
*^« «• ceiue good hope of forgeuenefl^e and faluation ? So Chrift alio be-
* 5* ganne his preachings : The kingdome of God is come nere at hand:
repent ye and beleue the Gofpeli . Firft he dedareth that the rrea*
fares of Gods mercie are opened in him , and then he requireth re-
I,uc.24. pentance, and laft of all confidence in the promifes of God. There-
*^ fore when he meantbriefly to comprehed the whole fumme of the
Gofpelljhe faid, that he muft fufFer & rife againe from the dead, and
that repentance and forgcueneflTe of flnnes mufl: be preached in bis
n3mc.The ApolHes alfo preached the fame after his refurrediOjthat
he was raifed vp by God, to geue to Ifraell repentance and forgcue-
ncfTc of finnes. Repentance is preached in the name of Chrifl:,when
men do heare by the dodrine of the Gofpell that all their thoughtes,
their aftl'dions , and their endeuors are corrupt and faulty , and that
therefore in is necefl^arie that they be borne againe if they will entrc
into the kingdome of God. Forgeuenefle of finnes is peached when
Rom. I . men are taught that Chrift is made to them redemption, righteouf.
3<». nefle, faluation and life ; in whofe name they are freely accompted
righteous and innocent in the fight of God,whercas both thefe gra-
ce s are receiued by faith , as I haue in an other place declared : yet
becaufe the goodnclfe of God whereby finnes are forgeucn , is the
proofe obied of faith , therefore it flialbe good that it be diligently
diftinguifhed From repen'-ance.
10 Now as the hatred of finne,which is the beginning of repen-
tance^
The grace of Chrift. Lib. 3. 248
tance,openeth vs the fir ft entrie vnto Chrift,which (heweth himfelfc Ef^-^u
to none but tomiferableand afflided finners, which grone, labour, ^^cix
are loden,are hungry and thirfty,and pine away with forrow and mi- 5.
ferie : fo muft we cndeuor toward repentance , throughout all our Luc.4.
life applie ir, and follow it to the ende, if we will abide in Chnft. For •'•
he came to call (inners , but to repentance : he was fent to bleffe the ^ ^"•^•
vnworthy , but fo that euery one (hould turne himfelf from his wic- ^<^ ^
kcdncfTe.The Scripture is full of fuch fayings.Wherefore when God 25.an4
ofTreth forgcueneflb of finneSjbc likewife vfeih to require on our 5 J«.
parte repentance , fecrctly declaring thereby > that his mercie ought
to be to menacaufe to repent them . Do (faith he) iudgement and Efa. 5*.
righteoufnefl'e,bycaufe faluation is come ncre at hand- Againe.There ^^39-
{hall come to Sion a Redemer, and to them that in lacob repet from ^^'i*
their (innes. Againe.Seke the Lord while he may be found:call vpon
him while he is nerc. Let the wicked leue his way and the wickednes
of his thoughts,and be turned to the Lordc,and he (hall haue mercy
on him. Againe.Turne ye and repent, that your finnes may be done Aft. u
away.Where yet is to be noted, that this condition is not fo annexed ^**
as though our repentance were a foundation to deferue pardon,but
rather (becaufc the Lorde hath determined to haue mercy vpon men
to this ende that they fliould repent) he tcacheth men whither they
{hall trauaile if they v/ill obteine grace. Therefore Co long as we (hall
dwell in the prifon of our body,we muft continually wraftle with the
vices ofour corrupt flefhiyca with our owne natural! foule.Plato faith Id cam
in certaine places , that the hfe of a Philofopher is a meditation of*'pj^^"
death, but we may more truely fay , that the life of a Chriftian man is 'jonc*'
aperpatuall ftudic and exercife of mortifiengtheflefh,till it being multis
vtteriy flaine , the Spirit of God get the dominion in vs. Therefore I difpu.
thinke that he hath much profited , that hath learned much to mi- '^^
flike himfclfe-.notthat he fhoulde fticke faft in that mire and go no
further, but rather that he lliould haft and long toward God, that
bemg graflfed into the death and life of Chrift,he Hjould ftudie vpon a
contmuail repcntanceras truely they can not otherwifc do,that haue
a naturall hatred of finne : for no man euer hated finne , vnleflTe he
were firft inlouewith righteoufnefTc. Thisdo(firine,as itwasmoft
fimple of all other, fo I thought it bcft to agree with the truth of the
Scripture.
21 Now that Repentance is afingulargiftofGodjIthinkeitbc
fo wel knowen by the dodrine aboue taught, that 1 neede not to re-
pete a long difcourfe to proue it againe. Therefore the Church prai- ^g^
fcth and hath in admiratign the benefit of God , tliac he hath gcucn i i, * *
Cap.3 . Of the maner how to rcceiue
S.Tim, the Gentiles rcpentace vnto faluation.And Paule commaunding Tf-
^•*5» mothee to be patient and milde toward the vnbeleuers, faith: If at
any time God geue them repentance that they may repent from the
(hares of the Deueil.God in deede affirmeth that he willeth the con-
uerlion of all men,and diredeth his exhoitati5s generally to all men :
but the effeduall working therofhangeihvpon the Spirit of regene-
ration.Becaufe it were more eafy to create vs men,than of our ownc
Ephc.i. pov/er to put on a better nature. Therefore in the whole courfe of
JO. regeneratio we are not without caufe called,the worke of God crea-
ted to good workes, which he hath prepared that we fhould walke in
them.Whom foeucr the lordes will is to deliuer from death,thofe he
quickeneth with the Spirite of regeneration : not that repentance is
properly the caufe oi faluation, but bycaufe it is alredy Cccn that it is
Efa. 55. vnfeparable from faith and from the mercie of God : fith (as Efaye
*o* tefti6eth)there is a redemer come to him,and to thofe that in lacob
are returned from their wickednefl'e. This truely ftandeih ftedfallly
determined , that where fo eucr liueth the feare of God , there the
Bfa. 6 3. Spirit hath wrought vnto the faluation of man. Therefore,in Efaye,
*7» when the faithfullcomplaine and lament that they are forfakcn of
Godjthey recken this as a token of being reprobateSjthat their hear-
Heb.tf . ^^^ were hardened by God. The Apoille alfo meaning to exclude
6, apoftataes from hope of faluation, apointeth this rcafon,that it is im-
poflible for them ro be renewed vnto repentance : becaufe God in
renewing them whom he will not haue perilb,(heweth a token of his
fatherly fauour, and in a manner draweth them vnto him with the
beamcs of his chercfull and mery countenaceron the other fide with
hardening them,he thundercth againft the reprobatejwhofe wicked-
Hcb. 10. nefle is vnpardonable.Which kinde of vengeance the Apoftlc thrca-
^S' tencthto wilfuU apoftataes, which when they depart from the faith
of the Gofpell , do make a fcorne of God, reprochefully dcfpife his
grace , and defile and treade vnder feete the bloud of Chrift , yea as
much as in them is they crucifie him againe.For he doth not (as fome
fondly rigorous men would haue it) cut of hope of pardon from all
wilfull finnes:but teacheth that apoltafie is vnworthy of all excufc:(b
that it is no maruellthat God doth punifli a contempt of himfelf fo
Vlthr 6. ftjl^ of facrilege, with vnappeafable rigour. For he faith that it is im-
4. poUible, that they which haue once ben enlightened, haue tafted of
the heauenly gift , haue ben made partakers of the holy Ghoft , haue
tafted of the good worde of God and the powers of the worlde to
comcjif they falljftiould be renewed to repentance,crucifying againc
of ncw,and making a fcorne of the fonne of God. Againe in an other
place:
I
-The grace of Chrift. Lib.3 . 24^
place :.If (faith he) we willingly finne after knowledge of the truth Heb. i
xcceiucdjtheie remainech no more facrifice for linnesjbut a certaine *5«
dreadfuil cxpedation of iiu:lgement,&c. Thefe alfo be the places,
out of the wrong vndeiftanding vvhereofjthe Nonarians in old time
hauc gathered matter to play the mad men: with whofe rigorouf.
nefle certame good men being offended, beleued this to be a coun-
terfait Epiftle in the Apoftles name,which yet in all partes doth irue-
ly fauour of an Apottolike fpirit.But bycaufe we contend with none
but with them that allow it , it is eafy to fhew , how thefe fentences
do nothing mainteine their crrour. Full it is neceflarie that the A-
oftle agree with his maifter , whiche affirmeth that all finne and
lafphemie (hall be forgeue,except the linne againft the holy Ghoft,
which is not forgcuen neither in tnis world,nor m the world to come.
It is certaine (I fay ) that the Apoftle was contented with this ex-
ception,vnlefle we will make him an aduerfary to the grace of Chrift.
Whereupon foUowcth , that pardon is denied to no fpeciall oftcn-
fes, but onely to one , which proceding of a defperate rage, can not
be afcribed to wcakenefle,and openly fheweth that a man is polfcflTcd
of the Deuell.
Z2 But to difcuffe this,lt bchoueth to enquire what is that fame
fo horrible offcnfe,that fhall haue no forge uenefie. Whereas Augu-
ftineinone place defineth itanobftinate ftifnefle eucn vnto death,
with defpeire of pard6,that doth not well agree with the very wor-
des of Chrift , that it fhall not be forgcuen in this world. For cither
ihatis fpoken in vaine , or it may be committed in this life. But if
i^uguftines definitio be true,ihen it is not committCd,vnIefleit con-
tinue cue vnto death.Wheras fome other fayjthat he finneth againft
the holy Ghoft, that cnuieththe grace beftowed vpon his brother:!
fee not from whenfe that is fetchcd.But let vs bring; a true definition
which being ones proued with fure teftin3onies,fhall ea(ily by it felfc
ouerthrowe all the refte. I fay therefore , that they finne againft the
holy Ghoft,which offer purpofe refift the truth of God,with bright-
nelfe whereof they are fo dafeled , that ihey cannot pretend igno-
rance: which they do onely to this ende to refift. For Chnft mea- Mac.it
ningtoexpounde that which he hadfaid,immediatlyaddeth:He '*•
that fpeaketh a wordc againft the fonneof man, it ftialbc forgcuen ^1^^^'^
him:but he that blafphemeth againft the holy Ghoft,ftiallnot be for- Luc.i »
geuen. And Matthew/or the blafphemie againft the holy Spirit,put- ^».
teth the fpirit of blafphemie . But how can a man fpeakc a reprochc
againft the Sonne, but it is alfo fpoken againft the holy Ghoft? They
chac ilumblc vnwarc againft the truth of God,nQC knowing it,which
II
Cap. 3. Of the maner how to rcceiuc
do ignorantly (jseake euell of Chrift,hauing yet this mindcthat they
would not extinguifh the truth of God difclofed vnto them, or ones
with one worde offend him,whome they hadknowen to be the
lordes anointed rthefe men finneagainft the father andthefonnei
So there are many at this day.that do moft hatefully detcft the doc-
trine of the Gofpell , which if they did know it to be the dodrine of
the Gofpell, they would be redy to worfhip with all their heart. But
they whofe confcicnce is conuinced , that it is the worde of God
which they forfake and fight againlhand yet ctflTe not to fight againft
it , they arc fiid to blafpheme the holy Ghoft : for afmuch as they
wraftle againft the enlightening that is the worke of the holy Ghoft.
Such were many of the lewes , which when they could not refift the
^d:.6. Spirit that fpake by Stephen, yet endeuored torefift. It is no doubt
' °' but that many of them were carried vnto it with xele of the lawe,but
it appereth that there were fomc other that of malicious wickedneffc
did rage againft God himfelfe > that is to fay againft the dodrinc,
which they were not ignoraunt to be of God. And fuch were thofe
Matt. 5?. Pharifees,againft whome the Lord inueyeth,which to ouerthrow the
34- and power of the holy Ghoft , defamed him with the name of Beelzebub.
1 2.24. yi^jj therefore is the Spirit of blafphemy , when mans boldneile of
fet purpofe , leapeth forth to reproche of the name of God. Which
I.Tim, pgule fignifieth when he faith , that he obteined mercie , becaufe he
*•' ^' had ignorantcly comitted thofe thinges through vnbekfe,for which
othcrwife he had bene vnworthy of Gods fauour.If ignorance ioined
with vnbeiefe was ihecaufe that he obteined pardon, thereupon
followethjthat there is no place for pardon, where knoweledge is
ioined to vnbeiefe.
2g But if thou marke it well,thou fliall pcrceiue that the Apoftlc
fpeaketh not of one or other particular fall,but of the vniuerfali de-
partinge whereby the reprobate do forfake (aluation. And it is no
t .lohn. maruelljthat they whom lohn in his canonicall Epiftle affirmcth not
• •i^' to haue bene of the eled , from whome they went out , do fclc God
vnappeafable. For he diredeth his fpeach againft the, that imagined,
that they might returne to the Chriftjan rtligion,although they had
ones departed from it : and caUing them from this falfe and peftilent
opinion, he faith that which is moft true, ih at there is no way of re-
turne open for them to the communion of Chriftjthat wittinj^ly and
willingly haue caft it away; But they caft it not away , that onely in
diffoluteJicentioufueflc of hfetranfgrcire the word of the Lord , but ^
they thatof fct purpofe caft away his whole dodrinc. Therefore the
deceit is in thcfe wordes of falling and finning. Dccaufe the Nouatias
expound
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 250
cYpound Falling to be,if a man being taught by the law of the Lordc,
thai: he ought not to ftcale or to commit fornicationjabiicincth noc
from Itealing or fornicntion. But contrariwife 1 affirme, that there is
a fecrete comparifon of contraries , wherein ought to be repeted all
thinges contrarie to that which was firft fpoken , fo chat here is ex-
preflcdnot any particular fault , but the whole turning away from
God,and (as I may fo call it) the Apoftalie oi the whole man.7 here- Ktbr.
fore when he faith,they which haue fallen after that they haue ones 4.
bene enlightened,and haue railed the hcauenly gjft, and bene made
partakers of the holy Gholt, and alfo tafted the good worde of God
and the powers of the worlde to come : it is to be vnderftanded of
them , that with aduifed vngoJlineirc haue choked the light of the
holy fpiritjhaue fpit out agamc the taft of the heauenly gift.haue cn-
ftranged themfelues from the (andlification of the holy Ghoft , haue
trodcn vnder foote the wordc of God and the powers of the worlde
to come. And the more to cxpreHe that sduifed purpofe of wicked-
ncflfe , in an other place afterwardc he addeth this wordc by name.
Wilfully. For when he faith, that there is left nofacrifice for them ^^^^ ,
that (inne willingly after knowledge of the tiuihe recciucd, he doth 1 6.
not denie , tliat Chrift is a continuall facrificc to purge the iniqui-
ties of the holy ones ( which he exprefly crieth out almoft in the
whole Epiftle, where hedeclareth the priefthoodc of Chrift) but
he faith , that there remaineth no other when that is ones forfaken:
and it is forfaken, when the truth of theGofpellisoffet purpofe
renounced.
24 But whereas fome do thinke it to harde and to far from the
tender merciefulnelfe of God , that any arc put away that flee to bc-
/eching the Lords mercie : that is ealily aunfwercd. For he doth not
fay, that pardon is denied them if they turneto theLorde rbuthc
vtterly denieth, that they can rife vnto repentance, bycaufc they arc
by the iufte iudgement of God ftriken with eternal! blindnefTe for
their vnthankefulnelTe. And it maketh nothing to the contrarie that
afterward he appheth too this purpofe the example of Efau^which in
vainc attemptea with howhng & weping to recouer his right of the
firft begotten. And no more doth that threatening of the Prophet,
when they crie, I will notheare. For infuch phrafes of fpeache is zach.l
meanre neither the true conuerfion^nor calling vpon God, but that i j.
carefulnefTe of y wicked wherewith being bounde,they are copelled
in extremity to loke vnto y which before they carekfly neglcdcd,
that there is no good thing for the but in y Lords hcIpe.But this thiy
dp noc fo much call vpon^as they mourne that it is taken from thcoau
IX ij
D
Cap. 3- Ofthemanerhowtoreceiuc
Therefore the Prophet meancth nothing els by Crying, and the
Apoftle nothing els by Wepingjbutthat horrible torment which
by defperatiofretteth & vexeth the wicked.Thisit is good to marke
diligently : for els God fliould difagree with himfclfe, which crierh
ze.i8. by the Prophet that he will' be mcrcifull fo foncas the iinnertur-
*• neth. And as I haue alredy faidjc is certaine that the minde of man is
not turned to better,but by Gods grace preuenting it. Alfo his pro-
mifc concerning calling vpon him,will neuer deceiue.But tliat bhndc
torment wherewith the reprobate are diuerfly drawen,wh£n they
fee that they muftneedcsieeke God, that they may finde rernedic
for their cuels,and yet do flee from his prefence,is vnptoperly called
Conuerfion and prayer.
' 2 f But a queftion is moucd , whereas the Apoftle denieth that
Reg. God is appeafed with fained repentance, how Achab obteined par-
^•-^* don and turned away the punifhment pronounced vpon him,whom
yet it appereth by the refte of thecourfe of his life to haue bene
onely ftriken amafed with fodeine fearc.He did in dccde pat on fackc
cloth, fcattered afhes vpon himjay vpOn the ground, and (as it is te-
fiiHed of him) he was numbled before God : but it was not enough
to cut his garmentes when his heart remained thicke & fwollcn with
malice. Yet we fee howe God is turned to mercy, I anfwere that fo
fomtimes hypocrites are fparedforaiime,buEyet fo that cuer the
wrath of God iicth vpon tnem,and that is done not fo much for their
fakes,as for common example. For whereas Achab had his punifhmct
mitigate vnto him,what profit got he thereby, but that he fhould not
fele it a hue in earth ? Therefore the courfe of God,altiiough it were
hidden,yet had a faft abiding place in his houfe,and he himfelf went
cn.a7 ^^^^ cternalldtftrudionThis fame is to be feene in Efau.For though
I. he had a repulfe , yet a temporcll blcfling was graunted him at his
weping.But bycaufe the fpirituall inheritance, by the oracle of God
could not rtft but with one of the brethren , when lacob was chofea
and Efau refufed , that putting away did exclude the mercic of God:
this comfort was left him as to a beaftly man , that he fhoulde be fat
with the fat of the earth and the dcaw of heaiien. And this is it that
I faid euen nowe , that it ought to be referred to the example of
other 5 that we (hould learne the more chcrefully to applie our min-
des and cndeuours to repentance,bycaufe it is not to be doubted that
when wc are truely and hartily turnedj God will be ready to forgeue
vs , whofe mercifulnefle extendeth it felfc euen to the vnv/orthy ,fo
longe as they fhew any griefe at all. And therwithal we be alfo taught,
how terrible iudgemcnt is prepared for all the obftinate, which novf
ixjake
The grace of Chrifl. Lib.3. 251
make it a fport with no lefl'e fiiamclcfl'e face than iron heart to Hefpifc
and fet nought by the threateninges of God. After his manner he
oftentimes reached out his hand to the children of Ifraeilj to reicuc
their miferics, although their cries were counterfair,and tlieir heart
double and faire,as himfelfe in the Pfalmc complaineth,thar they by Pfai.71
and by returned to thdr naturc,and fo minded with fo frendly gentle 3 s,
dealing to bring then to earncft conuerfion, or to make them vnex-
cufable. Yet in releaiing puniihmentcs for a time, he doth not binde
himfelfe to aperpetuall lawe thereby, but rather rifeth fomtimes
more rigoroufly againft Hypocrites , and doubleth their peincs, that
thereby may appere howc much faining difpleafeth him. But ( as I
hauc faid) he Iheweth fome examples of his redineffe to geue par-
don,by which the godly may be encouraged to amendement of life,
and their pride may be the more grcuoufly condemned , that flub"
bornely kick againft the pricke.
The iiij. Chapter.
That all that the Sophtjien babble in their fchoUso/TefianeeyU farjrom
thf purenejje of theGofpeli. Where it entreated of
Confe(?ton and SalufaSion.
Ow T come to difcufle thole things , which the Scheie So- jj out
phiftershaue taught of repenrance. Which I willrunouerin ofGrc
as few words as may bejbycaufe I mmde not to go through §^^y*t
all , leaft this boke , whiche I labour to drawe into a (hort '/ jf^f
abridgment, fhould growc to a huge greatnefle. And the Sophifters . ^cw
haue entangled it in fo many volumes, being a matter otherwife not Dill i^
very hardjthat a man fhall hardly finde how to get our,if he ones fall cap.i.
into their dregges.Firft, in defining it, they Ihew that they neucr vn- ^*^^ *,
dcrftode what repentance was. For they take hold of certaine fayings ^mbr<
of the oldc writers , which do nothing at all exprelTe that nature of & refci
repentance, as that to repent is to wepc for (innes paflTed, and not to jHic , i
commit finnes to be wept for : Againe,that it is to lament cuds paf- ^^^^^
fed, and not to commit againe other cucls to be lamented. Againe: ^^ 'J
that it is a cerraine forowfuU reuege,punifhing in himfelfe that which niter. .
he is fory to haue committed. Againe : that it is a forrow of hcart,and Poenit.
bitrerneflc of foule , for the euels that a man hath committed or to E.l°'*
\rhid\ he hath confcnied. But , to graunt thefe thinges well faide of ^^J. I
the fathers ,( which a contentious man might eafily enough denie) Augul
yet they were not fpoken to this cntent to defcribc repentance , but refert.
onely to exhort them to whom they wrotc,that they fhould not fall ^\,^'^
againe into the fame oficnfeSjOut of which they had ben drawcn. But ^'^^^^
II itj.
N
2>
Cap.4. Of the maner how to rcceiuc
Ht. 4 if we lilt to turne all fuch titles of commendation into definitiotisi
^^«^ then other may alfobe adioin-ed as rightfully as they. As this of
mbro- (T hryfoftome , Repentance is a medicine that deftroyeth finne , a gift
ift.i*. gcuen from heauen , a maruellous vertue,a grace furmounting the
reni. c. force of the law. Yea and the doftrine which they after ward teach,
era IS fomwhatwbrfe chan thefe definitions. For they fticke fo earneftly
*'"^* inoutward exercifes, that a manne can gr«ther nothmgc els out of in-
finite volumes , but that repentance is a difcipline and rigoroufneflc
that ferueth partly to tame the flefli , and partly to chaftife and pu-
ni(h vices : but they kepe maruellous filence of the inward renewing
of the mindc that draweth with it corredion of life.There is in dede
much talke among them of Contrition and Attrition , they torment
foules with many doubtcs , & do thruft into them much trouble and
carcfuinefTe : but when they feeme to haue throughly wounded the
heartes jthevhealc the bitterntffe with a light fprinkelingofccre-
.ibr 4. monies. And when they haue thus curioufly defined repetance, thiey
en. 1 6. diuide it into contrition of heartc,confeflion of mouth,and fatisfac-
a.i.de tionof worke,no more logically than they defined it, although they
^"5* wolde (eeme to haue wafted all their age in framinge of fyllogifmes.
.pcrfe- B"t if a man will go about to prouc by the definition (which kinde
t» pee ofargument is of force among logicians) that a man may wepe for
icecia Jjjs finnes palTed , and commit no more to be wept for , that he may
bewaile his eucls palfcd , and commit no more 10 be bewailed , and
that he tnay punifli himfcU for that which he was fory to haue com-
initted.&c. althouoh he do nor confelfe with his mouth: howe will
they maintaine their djuifion? For if that true penitent man do not
cOnfeiTe, then repentance may be without confeflion. But iftliey
anfwer , that this diuifion is referred to repentance, in rcfped that it
is a facramcntjoris meant of tiie whole perfe,<ftion of repentance,
which they comprehend notin their definitions,the is there no caufc
to blame me , but let them lay the fault in thcmfelues that make not
a purer and plainer definition ,1 truely (according to my groflnefle)
when any thing is difputed of,do referre all th!n^;s to the very defini-
tion,which is the ftay and grounde of the whole difputation. But ad-
mittc that to be their mafterlike liccnce.Now let vs particularly con-
fider all the partes in ordre . Wheras I do negligently Icape ouer as
trifles thofe things that they with great grauitieof countenar«44.4lo
pubhfh for mifteries , I do it not vnwittingely , neither were it very
J)aincful for me to cofute al that they thinke thefelues to haue depc-
yand futtlely difputed) butlwoulde thinke it againft confciencc
to wcry the readers widi fuch trifles without any profit. Truely it is
caiy
The grace of Chrift. ' Lb.3. . 252
cafy to know by the queftios which they mcue and tofle,and where-
with they mifcrabiy encomber themfclucs,that they prate of things
that they know not. As for example : whether the repentance of cue
iinne pleafeth God , when obftinacic enduretlun other. Againei
jvhethcv the puniflimentes layed vpon man by God , do auaile to fa-
tisfadion. Againe : whether repentance may be oftentimes reiterate
for deadly finnes : where they fowly and wickedly define , that pe-
naunce is daily done but for veniall (innes. Like wife they very much
toripjent themfelues with a grolTe errour , vpon the fayinge of Hic-?
rome , that repentance is a fecond bourde after (hipwraclre. Wherin
they ihcwe rkat iheyneuer waked fromtheir brutifhdulncfTejto
leelC' fo miidi as a farre of the thoufandth part of their faultes.
't\tsr> . Butl wold the readers {hould note,that here is not a quarcl ai
bout the Ihadow of an aflejbut the moft earncft matter of all other is
entreated o£, that is to fay , forge uenefle of finnes. For whecas they
require three things to repentance , contrition of hearty confeffion
'ofm6uth,andfatisfadionofworke;they do therwithall teach that
tbofe three things arenecefTarie to the obteining of forgeuenes of
iinnes. But if itbehouevs to knowe any thinge at all in all oure reli-
gion , this truely behowcth vs moft of alljl meane to vndcrftand and
^nowe.wellby what meane, with whatlawe , vpon what condition,!
with whateftfineffe or hardneiVe .the forgeuenefTe of finnes is obtai-
ned.lf this knowledge ftande not plaine and certaine,the cofciencc
xran haue no reft at all,no peace with God, no confidence or aflured-
nefle,but continually trcmbleth,waucreth,is troubled,is tormented,
is vexed, horribly dreadeth, hatethand fleeth the fight of God. But
if the forgeueneffe of finnes hang vpon thofe conditions to which
they do binde it, then nothing is more miferable , nothing in more
lamentable cafe than we. They make Contrition rheiirft parte of
obteining pardon, and they require that to be a due contrition, that
is to fay perfed and full : but in the meane time they do not deter*
>nine when a man maybe aflured , that he hath to the full meafurc
perfedly perfourmed this contrition.Truely I graunt that euery man
"ought diligently and earneftlyto enforce himfclfe , with, bitterly
weping for his finnes, to whet himfelfe more and more to alothing
and hatred of them. For this is a forro we not to be repented, that
ireedeth repentance vnto faluation. But when there is fuch a bitter-
nefle of forrowc required as may proportionally aunfwer the great-
ciefle of i:hefault,aiid fuch as may in balaunce counterpaifc with the
jruft of pardon, here the pure confciences are maruelloufly tormen-
ted an^l troubled , when chcy fee them felues chaunged with a due
ii.i» IX iiij
Cap 4. Of the raaner how to rccciiic
contrition of finncs , and do not fo atteine the rocafurc of that dw^
that they can determine with them felucSjthat they haue dueiy per-
formed Co much as they duely oughte.If they fay that we muft do at
much 35 hethinvSjthencomcvveftillto the fame pointc thacwc
were at b^forecfor how dare any manne affure himfelfc that he bath
cniployed .lU his force to bewade his linnes ? So when the confcien^
€es haiiinge. longe wraftled with them felues , and longe bene exer^
cifed with battailes,do at length finde no heaucn to reft in,yct fome-
what to eafe them fclues,they enforce them felues to a forrowcaand
wringe out tcares to make perfcd their contrition.
t } ^ But if rhey fay that I flaundre themrLcc them come forth and
fhewc anyone man , that by fuch dodrihe of contrition hath not ci*
ther bene driucn to defpeire, or hath not fet for his defeiifc a coun-
terfaitng of forrowe in ileede of true forrowe,againlt the lUdgemcni:
of GodAVe haue alfo our felues faid in one placCjthat forgeuenefle
ipf finnes neueriCommeth without repentance , bycaufe none but the
afflidexl and wounded with confcience of finnes , can- fincc rely call
vpon the mercie of God : but we haue therewithall furihcr faid,that
repentance is not thecaufe of the forgeueneffe of finnes. As for
thofe tormentes of foules , which they fay muft be perfourmed of
duetie , we haue taken them away : we haue taught the linner not to
loke vpon his owne contrition nor his owne teares,but to faftren both
lat.it. his eyes vpon the onely mercie of God. We haueonely put him in
8. minde that Chrift called the laboring and loden , when he was fent
^^' ^ ^' to publifh glad tidings to the poorc,to heale the contrite in heart, to
g "** preach remiffion to captiues, to <leliuer prifonners , and to comfortc
them that mournc. From which ihouldc beexcliided both the Pha-
riles, that filled with their owne rightcoufnefTcjdo not acknowledge
their owne pouertie, and alfo the defpifers that carekff:; of Godi
wrath do feke no remedy for their euels.For fuch do not labourjnot
are loden,nor contrite in heart,nor bounde nor captiue. But there is
great difference betwcene teaching a man to defcrue forgeueneife of
finnes with due and full contrition , which the finner can neuer pcr-
fourme : and inftruding him to hunger and thiift for the mercie of
God , that by the acknowledgingof his owne miferic , by his owne
ynquietneflfe^wearincffe and captiuitie, it may be fhewcd him,where
he ought to feeke for relecfe, reft and libertierand finally ,he may be
taught in the humbling of himfelfejto geuc glorie to God.
4 Concerning CofeiTionjthcre hath bene alway great ftrife be-
twene the Canoniftes & Scholediuines : while the one forte affirme,
that confeQion is comaunded by the fpeciall comaundement of God,
and
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3^ ^53
and the other lone deny it and fay, th at it is commaunded oncly by
the Ecclelialiicall conftitucions. But in this contention hath appea-
red the notable Ihamelefnes of the diuines, that haue corrupted and
violently wrafted as many places of Scripture , as they allcaged for
their purpofe . And when they faw that diey coulde not fo obtainc
that which they required , they which would be thouj^ht more futtlc
than the reft efcaped away with this fhift,that confcflion came from
the law of Godjin refped of the fubftancc of it, but afterward recei-
ued forme of the law Pofitiue . Euen as the fooli{heft forte amonge
the lawyers do fayythat Citations came from the law of God,becaulc
it is faid; Adam where ate thou? And hkewife Exceptions,becaufe A- ^
dam anfwcred as it were by way of exception fayinge: The wife that _ '"*•**
thou gaucft me. &c. but that both citations and exceptions receiucd
forme giuen them by the Ciuile lawe . But let vs fee by what argu-
nientes they prouc rhii confeillon , either Formed or Vnformed to [t.^(t
be the commaundemem of God . The Lord (fay they) fent the le-
prous men to the pricftcs.But what?Senthe the to confc{lion?Who ^" '
ruer heard it fpoken , that the Leuiticall prieftes were appointed to Luk. j,
hcare confeflions? Therefore they flie to AllegoricSjand iay:It was 14.
commaunded by the law of Motes, that the prieftes Ihould difccrne ^c"'»7»
b^tvreneleproficandleproficdinneisafpirituallleprofierthereforc
it i$ the pneftes office to pronounce vpoa it, . Before that I aunfwerc
>them,I aske this by theway,IfthisplacejTiake the iudgesofche fpi-
rituall Icprotie , why do rlvey draw to the the knowledge of naturail
and fic(hly lepro(ie?This forfooth is not to mocke with the Scriptu-
res. Thelawgiueth to tjie Leuiticall prieftes the knowledge of Lc-
proiie,therforc let vs t^ke it vpo vs.Sinne is a (piiitual lepro(ie,ther- ■
fore let vs alfo be examiners of linnc. Now I anfwere:(ith the prieft- Hefenr.
hoode is remorxed^itisneceffary thatthelawberemouedalfo. All lu
priefthoodcs are rcmoued to Chrift,and fulHlled and ended in him,
therefore to him.-onely^ill the right and honor of priefthoodeis alfo
remoued. If they loue fo well to follow allegories,lct them Cet Chrift
before them for die only prieft,and heape vpon his iud^cmenr feate
the free iurifdidion of all things: this we can eaiiiy be cotent to fuf-
fer.Moreouer their allegoric is very vnfit,thatfetteth among the ce-
remonies that lawe which is merely politike. Why then did Chnft
fcnde the leprous men to the prieftes ? I'hat the prieftes ftionlde not
cauiU that he did breake the law that commaunded the man healed
of the leprofie , to be fhewcd before the pricft and purged with offe-
ring of facrifice : therefore he commaunded the leprous men beingc
cicanfed, to do chat which belonged to the law. Go (fay th he) and
Gap4» Of the nianer how to receiiic
Ihewyour feluesto the prieft, and offer thegifr thatMofciHath
commaunded in the law that: it/houlde be for a witneiTe vnto them.
And trucly this miracle llioulde haue bin a witnelfe vnto them , for
they had pronounced them leprous,2nd now they pronounce them
healed. Are they not whether they will or no compelled to become
Mat j4.'Wi':J^cfles of Chriftcs miracles ? Chiift leaueth to them his miracle
14, to be examinedjthey can not deny it.But becaufe they ftsll dally with
Mat. 10. it, therefore this worke is for a witneife vnto them . So in an other
*^' placerThis Gofpell flialbe preached jn all the world, for a witnes to
all nations. Agame.-Ye (halbe led before kings and gouernours,for a
witneflTe to them,that is:that in the iudgement of God they may be
Mom.ii moreftrongly conuinced.But if they had rather folow Chrifoftome:
dc noa j^g gjf^j teacheth that Chrift did this for y lewes fake, that he (hould
Cha "^^^ ^^ accompted a breaker of the law. Albeit in fo cleare a matter
n«a. '1 3"! afhamed to alleage the witnefife of any manrwheras Chrift pro^
nbunceth that he leaueth the right of the 1 awe whole to the prieftes
as to the profeCTed enemies of the Gofpell , which were alway bent
,• ./. to carpeagainft it, if their mouth had not bin ftopped. Wherefore
that the popifli facrificing prieftes may ftiU keepe this poifefljon, let
them openly take partes v/iih them which muft of neccftity be rcr
' ttrained by force, that they fpeake not ill againlV Chrift. For this nor
*hinge belongethtOvhisirueminjfters^oqcJ/.-.ro. ; • 3:1?!
- 5 They biding their fecond argument out o-f the fame fountaine,
Jthat is from an allegorie^s,though allegories were of great force to
confirme any dodtrin.fiufi let thcmbe of force,if I do not proue that
• I can make a fairer fliew oFihe for my fide, than they can for theirs.
loh. II. They fay^Thc Lord commaunded his Difciples>that when Lazarus
-**• was raifed vp, they fliould vnbinde and loofe him from his bondes.
Here firft they lie: foritisnowhereread thac.theLordfaidthisto
the Difciples : and it is much more likely that he fa yd it to the Tewes
that ftoode by him, that the miracle might be made the more euidec
•tvithout fufpicion offraude, and his power appeare the grcatcr,that
without any touching,witfa his only word he raifed vp dead men.For
thus I expounde it:that the Lord,to take away all wrongfuU opinion
■fro the Iewes,wHled them to rolle away the ftoncyto feele the ftinke,
'to behold aflured rokejis of death, to fee him riling by the only po-
Scr CO- "^^^ of his worde,and them firft to feele himliuinge. And this is the
tralu- judgement iDfChryfoftome.But let ysgrauntihac this was fpoken to
das, Ge the Difciples: what will they get therby? That the Lord gaiie his A-
tilcs &.po{|les power to loofe.But how much more fitly and more handfom-
tic'^*" V n^ighc thefe thinges be applied by way of allegorie , to fay that by
this
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3^ ^54
" this fignc the lord meant to inftrud bis faithfull, to loofc them that
be had raifed vp:rhat is,that they lliould not call into remembrance
, thofe (innes that he had forgotten : that they fhould not condemnc
the for finners whom he had acquited: that they fhould not rcproch
men with thofc things that he had forgiuen.'that they iliould not be
rigorous to punifh,and lightly offended > where he is mercifull and
cafily entreated to fpare? Truely nothing ought to moue vs more ro
readinelTe to forgiuc, than the example of the ludge that threatneth
that he will be vnappcafable to them that be too rigorous & vngen-
tle.Now let them go and boall of their allegories.
6 But now they ioyne more neere hande with vs,whcn they fight
(as they thinke)with open fentences.They that came to lohns bap-
tifmejdid confelfe their iinnes,& Tames vvilJeth that we confefle our
finncs one to an other.No maruell if they that wold be baptifed did
confefle their (innes , for it was fayd before that John preached the
baptifme of repetancej& baptifed m water vnto repentance. Whom
(hould he then haue b3ptizcd,but them that had confefled themfcl-
ues (inners ? Baptifme is a token of the forgiuenefle of (innes : and
who (hould be admitted to this to'<e but (inners, & they that acknow^
ledge theleluej to be fuchf Therfore they cofeffed their linnes,thac
they might be baptifed. And not without a caufe doth lames bid v$
confeffe one to an other. But if they did marke whn followcth next
after,they would vnderftand,that this alfo maketh litle for the. Con*
fe(re('faith hpjonc to an other your (innes,& pray one for an other;
He ioyncth together mutuall confedion & mutual praierilf we mull
confefle to prieftcs only,the muft wc alfo pray for prieftes only.Yea,
What and if it might folow of the words of lames.that only prieftes
might conftflcf for when he willeth that we fliould confefle one to
an other,he fpeaketh only to them that may heare the confclTions of
Other : his word is in Grcke Allelous, mutually,intcrchaungeably,by
turnes, or(if they fo hke beft to tearme it)by way of reciprocatio one
to an other. But fo interchaj^eably none can cofefTejbut they that arc
mete to heare cofeflions. Which prerogatiue (ith they vouchfaue to
graunt only to prieftes, we do alfo put ouer the office of confefling to
them only .Therfore away with fuch trifelings,& let vs take the ve^y^
meaning of the Apoftle which is (imple & plaine : that is,y we Hiould
lay our weakenes one in an others bofome to receiue mutual coun-
fd,mutual copaftion & mutual comfort one of an othenthen that we
being naturally priuie to y weakenefTes of our brethren, fhould pray
for the to y Lord. Why do they then alleagc Tames againft vs.whicK
do fo earneftly require y cofeflion of the mercy of God.^'but no man
Cap.4* Of the maner hovir to rcceiue
Gall. |. canconfeflc Gods mercy, vnlcflchc haucfirft confeflcd his owno
* *• mifery.Yea wc rather pronounce him accurfed chat doth not before
**''*'* God, before his Angels, before the Church, yea and before ail men
confeflc himfelfe a (inner . For the Lorde hath concluded all vnder
finncs chat all moiithes might be ftopped , and all flefh huQibled be*
fore God,and he only iuftified and exalted.
. 7 But I maruell with what face they dare 3flfirme,that the confcf-
(ion whereof they fpeakc, is of the lawe of God : the vfc whereof wc
graunt in dede to be very auncient,but fuch as wc arc able to prouc
in old time to haue bin at liberty. Truely euen their ownc cronaclef
declare , that there was no certaine lawe or confticution of it before
the times of Innocent the third. Surely ifthey had had a more aunci-
entlaw) they woulde rather haue taken hold thereof , than haue bin
contented with the decree of the counfell of Laterane, and fo made
chemfelues to be laughed at, euen of children. In other things they
thei8 ;. fticke not to make forged decrees , which they father vpon the moft
Pope, auncient Counfells, that they may with very rcuerence of antiquity
dafell the eyes of the fimple.In this point,itcame not in their mindc
to thruft in fuch a faife packe.Thcrfore by their owne witneire,therc
are not yet'pafled three hundred yercs fince Innocent the third laid
that fnare vpon men,3nd charged them with nccelTity of ConfeiTio*
But , to fpcake nothinge of the time : the very barbaroufncflfe of thcr
wordcs miniflicth the credit of that lawe. For where thefe good fa-
thers commaundc euery one of both kindes , male and fcmale,oncc
cucry yearctoconfelTeallhis finnestohisowne pricftjpleafantmen
do merily rake exception,that in this commaundement are contained
©nly Hermaphrodites, & fay that it bclongeth not to fuch a one as ii
cither male or female only. Since that time, a more gtofle beaftlines
hath bewrayed it felfe in their fcholers, that can not expound what is
meant By his owne prieft.Whatfocuer all the Popes hyred bablers dof
pratCjWC hold both that Chrift was neuer the author of this law that
compelleth men to recken vp their finnes, and alfo that there pafled
a thoufande and two hundred yeares from the refurredion of Chrift
before that any fuch law was made . And fo , that this tyranny was
then firft brought in,whcn all godlinefle & learning being dcfttoied,
the vifiors of Paftors had without choife taken all licentioufnefle v-
pon them. Moreouer there are euident teftimonies both in hiftories
and other auncient writers,which teach that this confcffion wa? a po-
liticke difcipline redeemed by the Bifhops, not a lawe made by Chrift
or hii Apoftles. I will alleage but one out of many , which mall be a
?'."P*''^ plainc proufc thereof. Sozomenus reporteth that this conftitution of
*»'"'^«i»^ ^ ^ biihops
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 255
bifhops was diligently kept in all the weft Churches , but fpecially at
Rome. Whcrby he Ihcwcth that it was no vniuerfall ordinance of all
Churches . But he faith that there was one of the prieftes pecuharly
apointed to ferue for this office . Whereby he doth fufficiently coa-
fute that which ihefe men do falfely fay of the kcyes giuen for this
vfe vniuerfnlly to the whole order of pricfthoode. For it was nor the
common office of all prieftes,but the fpeciall duety of fome one thac
was chofen therunto by the billiop.Thefame is he,whom at this day
in all cachedrall Churches they call Pcnitentiarie , the examiner of
haynous ofFcnfes , and fuch whereof the punifiiment pertaineth to
good example. Then he faith immediatly after, that this was alfo the
manner at Conftantinople, till a cercaine woman fainmge thatlhc
came to confeflion , was founde fo to haue coloured vnder that pre-
tence the vnhoneft company that flie vfed with a certaine Deacon.
For this ad , Nedarius a man notable in holinelTe and learningcbi-
fliop of that Church, tooke away that cuftomc of confeffinge. Here,
here let thefe afles lift vp their cares. If auricular confeflion were the
law of Godjhow durft Nedarius repelle and deftroy itrWill they ac-
cufe for anheretike and fchifmarike Nedarius a holy man of Goi,
allowed by the confenting voices of ail the olde fathers f But by the
fame fentence they muft condemne the Church of Conftantinople,
in which Sozomenus affirmeth that the mancr of confeffing was not
onely let flip for a time , but alfo difcontinued cuen till within time
of his remembrance. Yea let them condemne of apoftahc not oncly
the Church of Conftantinople, but alfo all the eaft Churches which
haue negleded that law, \vhich(if they fay true)is inuiolablc & com*
maunded to all Chriftians.
8 This abrogation Chryfoftome , which was alfo bifhop of Con-
ftantinoplcjdoth in (o many places euidently tcftjfie, that it is maruei Homi %
that thefe dare muttet to the contrary.Tell(fayth he)thy (mnes that in PfaU
thou maieft do the away,if thou be afhamcd to tel any man the finnes Jo.
that thou haft done, tell them daily in thy foule.I do not fayjConfefle
them to thy fellow feruanr , that may reproch thce:tell them to God
that taketh care of them.Confefle thy finnes vpon thy bcd,that there Ser. <!•
thy confcience may daily recognife her euills . Againe. But now it is Pani-
not neceflary to confefle when witnefles be prefenc: let the examina- ""^^^
tionofthy finnes be done with thy thought : letthisiudgement be Hom*<.
without witnes.'let only God fee thee confefting. Againe.I do not lead dc inc$
thee into a ftage of thy fellow feruants, I do not copel thee to difdofe prehea.
thy finnes to men , rehearfe and vttcr thy confcicnce before God. ^^' "V
i>hew thy woundes to the Lord the beft rurgcon,& askc falue of him. t^ An»
BISOS.
Cap.4« Of the maner howto rcceiiie
Homi.4 Shew to him that will reproch thee with hothing,but will moft geir-
de Laza f\y heale thee. Againe.Tel not manjleaft he reproch thec,for neither
***• is it to be confefled to thy fellow feiuant, that may vtter it abroatle,
but to the Lord. To the Lord ihew thy woundes which hath care of
thecjthat is both gentle & a Phifition. Afterward he bringeth in Go4
(peaking thus:I compel thee not to come into the mids of a ftagc, Sc
call many witncflcs, tell thy finne to me alone priuaily,y I may healc
thy fore.Shall we fay that Chryfoftome did fo ra(hly,when he wrote
this and other like thinges, that he would deliuer mens confciences
from thefe bonds wherewith they be bound by y law ofGod?notfo.
But he dare not require that as of neceflity , which he doth not vn-
derftandto be commaunded by the word of God.
9 But that the matter may be made the plainer and eafier^firft we
will faithfully rchearfe,what kinde of cofeflion is taught by the word
of Godrand then we wilalfo declare their inuentions, but not all(for
who could draw drie fuch an infinite fea?) but only thofe wherin they
comprehend the lome of their fecret cofeflion. Here I am loth to re-
hearfe how oft the old tranflatour hath giuen m tranflation this word
Confeffe in ftede of Praifc : which the grofleft vnlearncd men com-
monly know : fauing that it is good to haue their prefumptuoufneffc
bewraied, that do giue away that which was wrytcen of the praifes of
God,to their owne tyrannicall commaundement.To proue that co*
fcirion auaileth to cheare the mindes they thruft in that place of the
Pfal.ij. Pfalmerln the voice of reioiiing & cofeflion.Butif fuch change may
i* ferucjthen we fhall haue what we lift,proued by what we lift. But fe-
ing they are fo become paft (hame , let the godly readers remember
that by the iuft vengcace of God ihey haue bin caft into a reprobate
minde, that their prefumption fliould be y more dctcftable.But if we
will reft m the fimple dodrine of the Scripture , wc fhall not be in
danper of any fuch deceites to beguile vs.For theriii is apointed one
order of confc (Tinge, that forafmuch as it is the Lord that forgiueth,
forgetteth,and putteth away finneSjtherefore we fliould ccnfeflc our .
finnes to him for to obtaine pardon, he is the Phifician, therfore let
vs (hew our difeafes vntohim.lt is he that is grieued & ojSedcd, ther-
fore let vs fcke peace at his hand.Hc is the knower of heartes, & pri-
uic to all thoughtes,therfore let vs make haft to poure out our hearts
before him. Finally it is he that calleth (inners,therfore let vs not dc-
PfaL CI ^^y ^° come to him.l haue(faith Dauid) made my (inne knowcn vnto
«, ihee,& haue not hidde my vnrighteoufnes.l haue faid,I wil confclTe
againft me my vnrighteoufnes to the Lord , 8c thou haft forgiue the
wickcdncs of my hcart.Such is the oihcr confcllion of Dauid. Haue
mcrcjr
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 25^
mercy vpon me O God , accordinge to thy great mercy* And fach is
the confeflion of DanielhWe haue finned, Lord we haue done per-.Dan. ^
uerfelyjWe haue commitred iniquicies,& haue bin rebellious in fwar* 5»
uing from thy comaundemencs. And fuch are other confeffions that
aie commonly found in the Scriptures,the rchearfall whereof would
almoft fill a great volume . If we confefl'e our finnes (faith Iohn)the i.Toh.t,
Lord is faithful to forgiue vs our finnes.To whom fhould we cofeflc^ .^
euen to himrthat is,if we fal downe with a troubled & humbled heart
before him,if heartily accufing& condemning our feluci before him
we pray to be acquired by his goodnes and mercy.
10 He that liartily and before God fhall embrace this confeflion,
flial vndoutedly haue both a tongue ready to cofefie,fo oft as it ihai-
be nedefuilfor him to publifli y mercy of God before me,& not on-
ly to whifper the fecret of his heart to one manj& once & in his earc:
but oft and openly , and in the hearing of all the world fimplv to re-
hearfe both his owne fhame and the magnificence & glory of God.
After this maner when Dauid was rebuked of Natha,he was pricked a.Sa. li
with the fting of confcience, & confcflcd his finne before both God »3'
and man. I haue(faith he)finned to the Lorde, that is to fay, now I
alleage nothing for my excufe , I vfe no (hiftes, but that all men may
fudge me a finner , and that the fame thing which I would haue had
fecret fro the Lord,may be alfo open to men.Therfore a willing con
feffion before men alway foloweth the fecret cofeflion that is made
to Godjfo oft as it is profitable for y glory of God or for y humbling
of our felues. For this rcaion the Lord in old time ordained iny pco- lcu.iA
pie of Ifraell,y the pricft (hould firft fpeake the words, & the people i^
faying after him fhould openly cofefle their iniquity in y church. For
he forefaw y this help was neceffary for the that cucry man might be
the better broughttoaiuftreknowledgingof himfelfe. And mete it
is y with y confeflio of oar owne mifery we fhould among our (clues,
& before all the world glorifie the goodneffe & mercy of our God.
1 1 And it is conuenient y this kinde of confcflio be both oidina^
ry in the church, and alio extraordinarily vfed in fpeciall maner, if it
happen at any time the people to be gilty of any generall fault . Of
this fecond kinde we haue an example in y folcmne confeflion which
all tlie people vfed by the meanes & guiding of Hfdras and of Nehe-
mias. For where as that long baniflimentj the dcftruction of the City Nej,,£^
andTemple.the diflc)luingofreligion,wasthepuniniraetofthcco 7.
mon reuniting of them all: they could not acknowledge tiie benefit of
dcliuerance in fuch fort as was mete, vnleffe they did firft condemnc
ihcmfelues . Neither oakech it maucr^ifin a whole Congregation
ED
Cap.4. Of the maner how to rcceiue
fome few fometime be innocent. For iich they be the members of a
feeble and difeafed body,they ought not to boaft of healthfulneflc.
Vea It is not poffible but they muftalfo thefelues gather fomc infe-
dion and bcare part of the blame.Therefore fo oft as we be afflided,
either with peflilence or warre > or barennefle or any other plague:if
it be our duety to flie to mourning , to fafimg and to orher fignes of
giltinefle'.then confeffion it felfe, wherupon all thefe things do hang,
is not to be negleded. As for the ordi;iary c6fe{Iion,befidc chat it is
commended by the Lordes owne mouth , there is no wifeman that
confidering the profit thereof,dare difallow it.For where as in all ho-
ly affembhes we make our apparaunce in the fight of God and the
Angelsrwhat other beginning may there be of our pleading,but our
reknowledging of vnworthineire?Buty(fome man will ray)is done by
cuery prayer.For fo oft as we pray for pardon,we therby confcfle our
iinnes. I graunt. But if you confidcrhow great is our carclefneflejor
^ droufinefle, or fluggillinefife, you will graunt me that it fhoulde be a
t profitable ordinance, if by fome folemne vfe of confeffion, the Chri-
ftian common people fhoulde be exercifed to humbling themfclucs.
For though the ceremonie that the Lord commaund'^d the Ifraehtes,
was parcel of the nurture of the law , yet in fome maner it alfo belon-
geth to vs. And trucly we fee that this vie is in well ordered churches
profitably obferued, that euery Sonday the minifter ihould rehearfe
a forme of confeffion in the name ofhimfelfc and ofall the people,
wherein he accufeth all of wickednes,and craueth pardon of the Lord.
Finally with this keye the gate to prayer is opened as well priuatly to
cuery man,as vniucrfally to all men.
1 1 Morcouer the Scripture alloweth two formes of priuate con-
feffion, one that is made for our owne fake, whereof that fayinge of
lac.5. ^^"^^^ '^ fpoken, that we fhould confcffe our finnes one to an other,
i4, for his meaning is, that difclofing our wickedneffes one to an other,
we fhould one help an other with mutuall counfell and comfort.The
other forme , that is to be vfcd for our neighbours fake , to appcafc
him & reconcile him vnto vs,if he haue in any thing bin offended by
ys. Now in the firft kinde of confeffion , although lames in this hath
affigned no man by name, into whofe bofome we {houlde vnlodc
our feluesjlcaueth vs a free choife,to confelTe to him that fhall feeme
mceteft vnto vs of all the flocke of the church : yet we ought princi-
pally to chofe the Paftors, becaufe they are for the moft part incom-
parifon of the other to be iudgcd meeteft.I fay that they are meetcft
Mat.itf. '" comparifon of the reft,becaufe the Lorde appointetb them by the
If. * very calling of their miniftcry, at whofe Inouth we fhouldc be inftru-
ac4
The grace otChnit. Lib.3. 257
^cd to fubdue and corredour finiieSjSnd alfo may recciuc comfort Mar.18.
by.tiuftofpardon.For astlic ofSce ofmutualladmcnifhmcnt & re- loHn.j,
promngc is cormuitied to all men,yet it is fpeaally cnioyncd to the ^^
minifters. So wheals wc all ought to comfort and confiimc one an
other in confidence of Gods mercy:yct wc fee char the miniIlers,to
aflurcour confcienccs of the forgiuenefle of finises., areordayncd
ssit'Wfre witatfles and pledges thereof, info niuchthat they be
(ayd to forgiue finnes and loofe foules . When thou heareft this to
bcaicribcd vnro thcm,thinke that iti§ for thy .prQ^t-Tb.crciQre let e-
ucry one of the faiihfull remember this to be.hisducty, if he be
prJuaiely fo vexed and troubled with the feelinge of {innesthathe
csn not windc ouclumfcKfc without help, of anl0iJ;Jerjnot to ncglc(ft
the remedy that the Lord hath oiiVrtdhim ; that is , for his rcliefe to
yfc the priuate confeffion to his owne Paftor:and for his comfort to
craue the priuate help of him^whofe diiety it ii both pubiiquely and
priuatety to comfort the people of God with thedo^rine of the Go-
fjjelL. Butalway this moderation ts to be vfed , where God dppoin-
teth no ccKaiiietie ^not to bfnd'e confcicoces^ with a certayne yoke;
Hereupon foil owcth that fuch Confeffion ou0u tobehee : not
to be required of all mcrt, hue to be commended to thofc oncly that
(hall vnderftand thcmfelucs to haue nede of ic.Then ihat eucn they
thai vfc it for their ncde,(hould not he compelled by any commaun-
dement>or traynedby any deceitCjto recken vp allrheir finncs,but fq
fin-e asthey (hall thinkc irbehoiK-ful for them,that they may receiue
p3Und frute ofcomfort.Faiihfull Paftors ought not only to leaue this
liberty to the churches,but alfo to maintaine it^& ftoutly {land m de-
fence ofit , if they will haue tyranny abfent from their miniftery and
fuperttition from the people.
ti ', Ofthe other forte ofconfefTionChriflrpeaketh in Matthew. Matt.y.
IfthoaofFer thy gift at the altar, & there remembreft that thy bro- »j'
iher hath any thing againft thee,leaue thy gift there, & go,& fii ft be
reconciled to thy brother,& then come and ofterthy gift.For fo cha-
rity that hath bin appaired by our fault,is to be repaired by acknow-
ledging & crauing pardon of the offence that we haije committed.
Vnder this kinde is contained their confeffion that haue finned euen
to the offending of the whole church. For if Chrift maketh fo great a
matter of the priuate oflfence of one ma, to forbid from holy mifteries
all them that haue fiilned againft their brother,tiU thty be with iuft a-
mcndes reconciled : how much greater reafon is it, that he that hath
offended the church with any euill example > {hould recouer the fa-- ^
uour of the church with acknowledging his £auit?SQ was the Corin- ^[^
K K
Cap4« Ofthemanerhowtoreceiue
thianreceiued againctothe communion,whenhe had yeldedhim-i
{d(c obedient to corredion. Alfo this forme of conkffion was vfed
in y old church,as Ciprian makcih mcntion.They do penance(raith
he) in due time,& theft they come to confeflion,and by laying on of
the handes of the bifhop & the Clergyjthey recciue leaue to come to
the comunion.Any other order or forme of cofeffing, the Scripture
vtterly knoweth not,& it is rrot our duety to binde conferences with
new bonds, whom Chrift moft iharply forbiddeth vs to bring in bo-
dage. In the meanc time I do fo much not fpcake againft it that thd
ftiepe fliould prefent themfelues to their fhepeherd whe they mean<j
to be partakers of the holy fupper,that I would moft gladly hauc it e*
uery where obferued. For both they that haue an encombred con*
fcienccmay from thence receiue Angular profit , & they that are to
be admoniflicd do by that meane prepare pJaee for admonilhmcnt^
but fo al way that tyranny and fuperftition be away.
14 In thefe three kindes of confeflionjthe power of y keics hath
place : thatis, either when the whole church with folemnc rcknowri
iedging of their faultes craueth pardon:or when a priuate man,thac
by any notable fault hath bred comon offence, doth declare his rc-t
pcntance:or when he that for the vnquietnes of his confcience^oth
nede help of y minifter difdofcth his weakcnes vrMohim.0ut there
are diuerfc ways of taking away oflence, becaufe ahhough thereby
alfo the peace of confcience is prouided for,yctthe principal endisy
that hatred fhould be take away,& mens mindes knit together with
a bond of peace But this yfe that I haue fpoken of,i$not to be dcfpi-
fedjthat we may the more willingly cdfelTc our finnes.For when the
whole church ftandeth as it were before the iudgemet feate of God,
confefleth itfelfe gilty,and hath one only refuge vnto the mercy of
God: it IS no fclcnder or light comfort to haue there prefent Chrifts
embaflfadourjhauing comaundemet of reconciliatio,of whom it may
heare abfolution pronounced vnto it. Here the profitablenes of the
keies is worthily comended,whe this embafTage is performed rightly,
& with fuch order & religioufncs as bcfeemeth it.Likewife when he
that had in a maner eftranged himffclfe from the Church, receiueth
pardon & is rcftored into brotherly vnity : how great a benefice is it ^
that he vndcrftandeth himfelfe to be forgiue by the,to whom Chrift
Mat. 1 8. hath fayd : To whom foeuer y e forgiue finnes in earth , they Ihal be
'9- forgiuen in heauen. And of no lefle eftedualnes & profit is prioate ab-
loh.jo. fo]uti5,when it is asked by them that haue necde of fpeciall remedy
* to relieuc their weakcnes. For it happeneth oftetimcsthat he which
beareth the gencrall promifes that arc dircdcd to y whole congrega^
cion
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3, 258
tion of the faithtuljicmaineth neuertbeles in fome clouc,& hath ftil
an ynquictmindcjas though he had not yet obtained pardon.-& the
fame niljif he haue difclofcd to his pierfon y fecrec lore of his mind,
& heareth pecuHarly direded to himfelfe that faying of the Gofpe],
Thy finncs are forgiue thee, be of good hopcftabliflicth his mmde f^^^^
vnto alTurednes & is deliueie d fro that tierabling,wherc\vith he was 2.
before tormented . But when we fpeake of the keyes,we muft talcc
hcde that we drcame not ofa certaine power feuered from the prea-
ching of y Gofpcl.In an other phice we fhal haue occafion more flil-
Ty to declare this matter again^where we fhal entfcat of the gouern-
ment of the church; & there ihall we fee that all the power to binde
& to loofe, which Chnft hath eiuen to his church , is bcund to the
worde.Butthis is moft trueinthe miniftery of the key es, the whole
force whcrof ftandeth in this,y the grace of the Gofptl be pubhkcly
& priuatly fealed vp in the heartes of the faithful, by them whom the
Lord hath ordaincd:which can nof be done but by only preaching.
r <) But what fay the Romifh diuines?They decree that euery one C. Om-
of either kihdc,fb foone as they come to the yeres of dircreti5,muft nis vrri
yearely once at the Icaft confefle all their (innes to their owne'prieft: "*M"e fc
& that their finne is not forgiucn,vnleflre they haue firmely conceiucd fi,n,n,^
an entcnt to confeffe it: which intent if they performe not when oc- trinita-
ca(ion is offred that they may do ]t,there is now no more entry open te & fi.
for the into Paradife. And that the pritlt hath the power of the keies, °^ *^**
wherwith he may loofe & binde a (inner:becaufeth.e word of Chrift j^ jj
is not in vairiejWhatfbeuer ye binde. &c. About this power they ftout {^ecre of
ly fight amonge themftlues . Some fay that there is butonekeye in PopeTn
fiibftanccjthat is the power to bmdc & loofe, and as for knowledge, ".o~en-
thatitisindederequih'te foragood vfe.but that it is only as an accef- ^'j^f* '"
fary & is not eflentially loyned wjth the other. Some othcr,becaufe ff.\\ of
they faw this to be too much an vnbridled licence^haue reckcned vp Late
two keies,difcretionj& power.Othcr ag3ine,when they faw the lewd ?"^"^
boldnes ofprieftestobereftrainedby thismoderatio«,haue forged ^^^^
otherkeies,thatistofay, authority of difcerning which they (hould Libr 4.
vfe in giuing determinate fentence:& power, which they fhould pra- Senten
^ife in executing of their fentcnce: & that knowledge Itandeth by as • 4-ca« ^
a coufeller. But they dare not fimply expound this binding & looling '** j*|-^
to be to forgiue and put away fiilnes , becaufe they heare the Lorde ,^.ca.a.
cryinge out in the Prophet : It is I, and none other but I:it is I, it is I Mac.i i,
that put away thy finnes , O Ifraell , But they fay it is the prieftes *9-
office to pronounce who be bounde or loofed,and to declare whofc ^^:
linnesare forgiuen or retained; and that he doth declare it, cither ,'
- , KK i;
COU
f
IS reci-
Cap .4* Of the maner how to receiuc
by confelTion when he abfolueth & retained finneSjor by fentencc
when he excomrftunicated and receiueth againe to partaking of the
Sacramentes. Finally ,when they vnderftand that they be not yet out
of this doutjbut that it ftil may be obieded againft them,that often-
times their priefts do binde and loofe men vnwor thy, which are not
therfore bounde or loofed in heaue:then(which is their laft refuge)
they anfwere that the giuing of the keyes5muft be conftrued with a
Iirfiitation,that is to fay , that Chrift hath promifed, that before his
itidgement feate fuchfentence of the Prieft fhalbe allowed as hath
bin iuftly pronounced, accordinge as the deferuingcs of him that fs
bounde or loofedjdid require. Moreouer they fay , that thefe keyes
are giuen by Chrift to all Prieft?, and are deliuered to them by their
Bifboppes , at the time of their promotinge to pricfthoode : but the
free vfe of them, remaineth only with fuch as do exercife Ecclefiafti-
call offices : and that the excommunicate & fufpended Prieftcs haue
in deede the keyes, but rufty & bounde vp. And they that (ky thefe
things may well feeme modeft & fober in coparifon of y reft, which
vpon a new anuidde haue forged new keyes with which they fay the
trcafare of the church is locked vp . Thefe keyes we fliall hereafter
trie in place fit for it,
i6 Now I will in few wordes anfwere to euery one of thefe par-
ticularly. Butat this prefent I fpeake not by what right or what
wronge they binde the foules of the faithfull with their lawes, foraf-
much as we will confider that when place ferueth . But where they
charge men with a law of reckcninge vp all their finnes : where they
fay that finnc is not forgiuen but vpon condition , if there be an in-
tent conceiued to confefle it: where they babble that there remaineth
no entrie into Paradife,if occafion of confeflinge be ncglcded : this is
Pfal 10 *" "° ^^^^ ^° ^^ fuflfered. Muft all finnes be reckened vp?But Dauid^
, J " * (Who as I thinke)had well ftudied vpon the confeffion of his finnes,
yet cried out:who fliall vnderftand liis errours? Lord clcanfe me from
Pfal.38. my feeret finnes. And in an other place.My iniquities haue pafTetta-
^' boue my heade,and hkc a weighty burden haue waxed heauy aboue
my ftrcngth. Trucly he vndcrftoode how great was the bottomleffe
deprh of our finnes : how many were the fortes of our mifchieuouj
doingSjhow many heades this monftcr Hydra didheare,8c howjong
a tailc fhc drew after her. Therefore he went not about to rccken vp
a rcgifter of them , but out of the depth of euills , he cried vnto the
Lordrl am ouerwhelmed , I am buried and choked, the gates of hels
haue compafled me,let thy hand draw me out, which am drowned in
the great pit,and am fainting and ready to die.Who now may thinkc
vpon
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 25^
vpon rhe numbring of his finnes, whe he feeth that Dauid can make
no numbre of his? -^^ ■'""'':
17 Witli ihis butchery , the foules thajj hauc bin touched with
any fcehnge of God, haue bin more cruelly vexed. Firtt they called
themfelucs to accompt : then they tleuided finnes into armes , into
boowes , into braunches,and into tvvigges,according to tljefe mens
rules:chen they weyed the qualities , quantities , and circumihnccs.
And fo the matter went a litle forward . But when they had procee-
ded a lide further, than was'on ech fide skie, and on ech fide feac,no
haucnjHo fafe roade : the mo that they had pafled ouer, th-; greater
heape alway did thruft it felfe into their fight,yea they rofe vp as hyc
mountaines,& there appeared no hope,not fo much as after long co
pa{Iings,any way to efcapc. And fo they did fticke faft betwcne the fa-
crifice & the ftone,& at laft was found no other iflue but defperation.
Then thefe cruel butchers,to cafe the woundcs that themlelues had
made,laid certame gende plaifters,that euery man {hould do as much
as he could. But new cares againe rofe vpjyea new tormentes did flea
the filly foules,as to thinke:! haue not emploied time enough,! hauc
not endeuored my felfe with fuch diligence as I ought, I haue paffcd
ouer many things by negligece & the forgetfulnes thatcommeth by
negligence is not cxcufable.The were there miniftred other plaifters;
to aflwage fuch paines , as Repent thee of thy negligence : if it be noc
altogether careleffejit {hall be pardoncd.But all thefe things can not
clofc vp the wounde,and are not fo much eafment of the euill,as poi-
Com couered with honey , that they fhould not with their bitterneflc
offend the firft taft.but enter into the bowels beforelhat they be per*
ceiued. Therfore this terrible faying alway calleih vpon the & foun-
deth in their eares;Confefle all thy finnes. And this horrour can noc
be appeafed but by afTured cofort.Here let the readers confider,how
pouiblc it is to bring into accompt all the doings of a whole yere, &
to gather together what finnes they haue done euery day '.forafmuch
as experience proueth to euery man, that when at eucninge he fliall ''
recken vpthe faultes but of one day,his memory is confounded thcr-
withjfo great a multitude & diuerfity prefenteth it felfe.For I fpeake
not of grolfe & blockifh hypocrites that thinke they haue done fuf-
ficiently,if tliey haue noted three or foure of the greatell finnes: but
I fpeake of the true worlTiippers of God, which when they Tec them-
ftlues opprefied with the examination that they haue made,do addc
ahb this faying of Iohn:lf our owne heart do accufevSjGod is grea- y .
ter than our heart : and fo they quake for feare at the fight of that jo,
iudge,whofc knowledge farre furmountech our vnderftanding,
KK iij
Cap.4. Of the maner how to receiiic
18 But wheras a great parte of the world rcfted them vpon (uch
flatteries , wherewith Co deadly a poyfon was tempered , this came
not fo to pafle , becaufe they beleued y God was fatisfied,or becaufc
they themfelues were fully ratisfied:but that the anchor caft as it wer
in the njidde rc3,{houlde reft a litle from faylinge,or as a wayfaringc
man weary and faintingc , fiiouldc lye downe in the way . I laboiire
not much m prouinge this.For euery man may be witnefle to him-
felfe. I wtU m a (horte fummc ihew,what maner of law this was. Firft
fimply it is impofiible 3 and therefore it can do nothinc: but deftroy,
damnCjConfoundejand caft in ruine and defperation. And then whc
it hath ledde lijiriers from the true feelmgc of their finncs,it makqth
them hypocrites andignoraunt or God Si. themfclues.For while they,
arc wholly buhcdin reckcning vp ottheir finacsjn the mcane time
ihcy forget the fecretc finke of vices, their hidden Iniquities,and in-
ward hlthi»elie , by knowledge whereof they (houlde chiefely haue
wtyed their mifery.But this was a moft ccrtaine rule of coafefiion,to
acknowledge and conltlfe the bortomlefte depth of our euiUto be fo,
great as p.iflcth our vnderiiandinge . After this rule we fee that the
luc.i 8. puhlicanes confeflion was m.^de. Lordc be mercifull to me a (inner:
*^' as if he {hould fay : All that euer I am , I am altogether a h'nner , and
i can not atcaine with witte or expreffe with tongue the greatnelfe
of my linne.s: let the bottomleflfe depth of thy mercy fwallow vp the
boitomlcfi'e depth of my finne. But then thou wilt fiy , what?are not
allourlinnesio beconfeflcd? is no confefllon acceptable to God,
but that which is knitte vp in thcfe two wordes, I am a finner r No,
but rather we muft endeuour our feluesasmych asinvs lycth , to
poure our our heart before the Lorde , and not onely in one worde
confetfe our felues {innets,but alfo truely and heartily acknowledge
our felues to be fuch : and with all oar thought recorde,howe great
anddiuerfeis our filth of finnes> not onely thatwebe \ncle3ne,but
what , how great,and in howe many partes is our vndeanncfl'e : noc
onely that we be detters , but with howe great dettes we be loden,
and howe many wayes charged : not onely that we be wounded,
but alio with howe many and deadly ftrokes we be wounded . With
pfa 1 9 *^*5 reknowledging when the (inner hath wholly poured out himfelfc
31. before God , lette him earneftly and fincercly thinl-e , that yet there
remay nc moc (innes , and that the fecret corners of their emls are Co
dcpe,that they ca not be throughly difclofed. And he crieth out with
Dauid:Who vnderftandethhis errouis? Lord cleanfe mc fro my hid-
den finnes.Now where they affirmc, that (innes are not forgiuen but
with an intent of confelTinge firmcly concciucd, and that the gate of
para-
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3 . il 60
paradife is fhuc againft him that neglcdeth occafion offered when he
may be confcfledjGod forbid that we fhoulde graunt them that. For
there is no other forgiuenes of fianes , than alway hath bin. It is not
read that all theyhauc cofefTed their finnes in the earc of feme prieft,
that wercade to hauc obtained forgiuenefTe of finnes at Chriflcs
hand. And truely they could not confefTe, where there were neither
any priefts cofefforsjnor any cofefllng at all. And in many ages after,
this confeffion was vnheard of, at which time finnes were forgiucn
without this condition.But that we may not neede to difpute longer
about thiSjas about a doutfull matter,the word of God is plain,which
abidcth for euer : Whenfoeuer the (inner rcpenteth, I will no more
remember all hisiniquities.Hc that dare adde any thing to this word, Etc.i 8.
bindethnot finnes,but the mercy of God. For whereas they favjthat *»•
Judgement can not be giuen but when the caufe is hearde j wc hauc
a foiution in readinefTe , that they do prefumptuoufly take that vpon
themfelueSjWhich haue made themfelues iudges. And it is a maruell,
that they do fo boldly frame to themfelues fuch principles,as no man
in his right wit will graunt.Thcy boafl that the office of Binding and
Loofing is committed to them,as though it were a certaine iurifdidio
ioyned with Inquifitio.Morouer their whole do^rinc crieth out,that
this authority was vnknowen to the Apoflles.Neither doth it belong
to the prielijbutto him which defireth abfolution, to know certaine-
ly whether the finner be loofed or no : forafmuch as he that heareth
can neuer know whether the reckning be iuft and perfed.So fhould
there be no abfolution but fuch as is retrained to his wordes that is
to be iudged.Moreouer the whole order of loofing ftandeth of faith
& repentance,which two things are hidden fro the knowledge of ma,
when fentcnce mufi be giuen vpon an other man. It folowcth therc-
fore,that y alTurance of binding & loofing is not fubieft to the iudge-
ment of an earthly iudge : becaufe the minifler of the wordjwhen he
doth his office,can not giue abfolution but coditionally: but that this
is fpoken for the finnes fake , Whofe finnes ye forgiue. &c. that they
fhould not dout that the pardo which is promifed by the ctimmaun-
demcnt and word of Godjfhall be ratified in heauen.
19 Therefore it is no maruell, if we condemne and dcfire to haue
vtterly taken away this Auricular confeffion, a thing fo peftilent & fb ^^
many waies hurtful to the Church:but if it v«'ere a thing by it fclfe in-
different, yet forafmuch as it is to no vfc nor profitc , and hath giuen
caufe to fo many wickednefTes , facrilcges and errours , who will not
thinke that it ought to be prefcntly abolifhedf'They do in dede reckeo
vppe fomc good vfes , which they boaft vpon as viery profitable , but
; KK iiij
Cap.4. Ofthemanerhovvtorecfiiue
thefc either falfe or of no value at all.Onc oilly they commend wttb
a lingular prerogatiue,thatj[hame is a ,great,puni{hmenc of him that
cofeilethjwhcrby the iinner both is for time to come made warer,6c
preuenteth the punillimcntof God in pumflmg himfelfe.As though
we did not humble a ma with fhamefaftni's enough when we cai him
toy hie iudgementfeate of heauen,! meane to the hearing of God.
It is forfooth very well profited,if for (hame of one mans knowledge
we ceffe to (innc,and be notaihamed to hauc God witnes of our cuii
confcience . Although the very fame is alfo moit falfc, for it is to be
feene that by nothing groweih grearer confidence or licentioufneiTc
to iinne, than when men hauinge made confciiion to a pneftjihinkc
that they may wipe their mouth and fay, I did it not. And notx>nely
they are made all y ycare long the bolder to fmne : but all the reft of
the yeare bearing themfclues bolde vpon confedionj they neuer figli
vnto Godj they neuer retume to themfehics, but heape finnes vpon
finnes nil they vomit vp all at once as they thmkc . And when they
; haue once vomited them vp , they thinke themfelues difcharged of
their burdrn,and that they haue taken away from God the iudgemet
that they hnue giuen to the prieft, & that they haue brought God iii
forgctfulnes when they hauc made the prieft priuie Morcouer who
doth menly fee the day ofconfellion athande? Who goethtocon-*
fefTion with a cherefull heart , and commeth not to it rather againft
his willj & as it Were drawinge backewatd,likeasifhe were taken by
the necke&dtawcn to piifon ? vnlefle paraduenture it be the very
ptitfteSjthat vfe ioyfully to delite themfelues with mutuall rehearfals
of their doingSjas were with mcry tales? I will not defile much paper
with monftruous.abhominations whereof auricular confeffion fwar-
mcth fuli.Onely this I fay. If that holy ma did not vnwifely, that for
one rumoi:of fornication tooke away confeffion out of his Churchy
yea,out of the remembrance of his flockc:then we be thereby put m
minde what i% needefull to be done at this day vpon infinite whoiv^
domeSjaduheries.inccftes and bawderies.
20 Where the Confcffionars allcage for this purpofe the power
of the keyes , and do thcrupo fetthe peupeand prore of their kiage*
dome , as the proucrbeis:itis to be feene how much they ought to
Mat.18. auaylc. Then(fay they) are the keyes giuen without caufc ? Is it fayd
'2» without caufe : Whatfoeuer you loofe vpon earth , Ihall bealToJ'
looled in H^uen ? Do we then make the worde of Chnft voyde:?
I anfwere there was a weighty caufe why the keyes fhould be giuca,
as both I hauc euen no we already declared , and (hail more plameiy
fitcw againt^when I come to entreat of Excommunication. But what
^iu ... if
The grace of Chri ft, Lib.3. 261
if I Ho with one Iwerde cutt of the holde of all that they rcquirc,that
h with fay ingjthat facrificing prieftes are not y vicars nor fuccelfors
of the Apoftles? But this fhall alfo be to be entreated of in an other
place .• but nowe they raife vp an engine whereby they wolde moft
of all defcnde thcmfelues , and thereby may all their buildinges be
ouerthrowen.For Chrift did not geue his Apoftles y power to bindc
andloofe,before that he gaue them the holy Ghott.'f herfore I fay,
that none haue the power of the keyes that haue not firft receiued
the holy Ghoit. 1 denie that any man can vfe the keyes , but hauing
the holy Ghoft going before,and teaching him and informing him
what is to be done. They trifling fay, that they haue the holy Ghoft.
butindedethcy denie it,vnlefle paraduenture they faine (as they do
fainc in dede) the holy Ghoft to be a vaine thing and a thmg of np-
thmg, but therin they ihall not be beleued. And by this engine they
are vtterlyouerthrowen, that of what foeuerdore they boaltthat
they haue the keye,a man may alway afke them whether they haue
the holy Ghoft which is theiudge and gouerncr of the keyes. If they
aunfwer that they haue , then they may be af ked againe , whether
the holy Ghoft may erre. This they will not be glad to fpeake ex-
prtfly , ahhough they crokedly vttcr the fame by their dodrine. It is
therefore to be gathered , chat no prieftes haue power of thekeyes
which do commonly without conhderation loofe thofe thinges that
the Lorde woldc haue to be bounde , and binde thofe thinges that
the Lordc commaunded to be loofed.
2 1 Wheras they fee thcmfelues conuinccd by moft dere experi-
menies^that they do without choife loofe and binde the worthy and
vnworthy,?hey vfurpc a power without knowledge. And although
they dare not denie that knowledge isrequific fora good vfe, yet
they write that the very power is geuen to euel difpofers of it. But
this is the powcr,wh3tioeucr thou bindcft or loofeft in earthe,lhalbc
bounde or loofed in heauen.Either the promife of Chrift muft lie, or
they that haue this power do well binde and loofc.Neither may they
dallre and fay, that the faying of Chrift is hmited according to the
dcfcruings of him that is bound or looled. And we alfo confelfc,that
none can be bound or loofed , but they that are worthy rp be bound
or loofed. But themeflengers of theGofpell and the Church haue
the wordc.by which they mcafure this worthinelfe,in this vvorde the
meflengers of the Gofpell , may promife to all men forgeuencffe of
finnes m Chrift by faiih,they may proclaime damnauon into all and » Cor.
ypon all that embrace not Chrift,In this word the Church pronoun- ^- >•
ccthxhat farnicatouis,adultcrers,theiies,manfleyerS;Couetous mcn>
Cap4» Of the maner how to recciue
vniuit nien,haue no parte in the kingdom of God, and bindeth fuch
with moft fure bondes . With the fame worde the Church loofetli
them whome it comforteth being repentant. But what power {hall
this be,not to know what is to be bounde or loQred,& not to be able
to bindeor loofe without knowledge > Why then do they fay that
they loofe by authoritiegeuenvnto them, when the loofingisviw
certain ? What haue we to do with this imaginaduc power, if there
be no vfe of it? But I haue it already proued that either there is no
vfe of it , or fo vncertaine an vfe as may be accompted for none ac
ail. Forwheras they confeOethat there is a great parte of prieftes
that do not rightly v(e the kcyes , and that the power without lawc*
fullvfcisofnaeffeft. Who (hail alTurcme that he of whome 1 am
loofed is a good vfcr of the kcyes? if he be an euell vfcr of it , whac
hath he els but fuch a voide dUpofing of thcm,3S to fay, what is to b«
found or loofed in thee I knowe not, for afmuch as I lack the right
vfe of the keyes,but if thou defcrue I loofe thee. But fo much might
do , I will not fay a by man (for they could not beare that with pa«r
ticnt eares)but a Turke,or a Deuell.For it is afmuch as to fay,I haue
not the worde of God the fure rule ofloofing jbut there is power
geuen me to loofe thee , if thy cicfcruinges be fo. We fee therefore
what they meant , when they defined the keyes to be the authoritie
ofdifcerning, and power of executing rand that knowledge is ad-
ioined for a counfeller , and like a counfeller feructh for a good vfe:
vndoubtedly euen they defired torcigne at their owne will, liccn-
tioufly, without God and his worde.
21 If any man take exception and fay , that the lawfull minifters
of Chrift fliall be no lefle doubtefull in their office , bycaufe the ab-
folution that hangeth vpon faith Ihall alway remaine doubtcfulhand
then that finners ihall haue either none or a could comfortc,bycaufe
the mjnifter himfelfe which is no competent iudge of their faith,
can not be affured of their abfolution:we haue aunlvvcr thereunto in
redineffc. For they fay that no finnes are forgeuen by the prieft, but
fuch whereof himfelfe hath bene the heaierrfo by^their opinion,thc
forgeuenes hangeth vpon the iudgement of the prieft , and if he dp
not wifely difcerne who be worthy of pardon , the whole doing is
voide and of no effed.Finally the power whereof they fpeake,is a lu-
rifdidionadioined to examinatioUjwherunto pardon and abfolution
is rcftrained. In this point is found no fure ground , but rather it is a
botromlefTc depth. For where the confeffion is not found, the hope
of pardon is alfo lanie,3nd theti the priefl himfelf muft ne^des fticke
in fufpcnfe while he can not tell , whether the finner do faithfully
recken
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 2^2
rcckcn vp all his cuell deedes. Finally (fuch is the ignoraunce and
rudcnefTe of prieftcs) the moft parte are no fitter to do this office,
than a fliomaker is to plovve the ground,and the reft in a manner all
ought worthily to fufped themfelues. Herevpon therefore rifeth the
perplcxitie and dowbcfulnelTe of the Popes abfolucion , bycaufe they
will haue it grounded vpon the perfon of the prieft , and not onely
ihat , but alfo vpon knowledge , that he may iudge onely of thinges
informedjCxamined and proued. Nowif aman fhouidafkeof thefe
good doders , whether a firmer b; reconciled to God , when fomc
finnes are forgeuen : 1 fee not what rhey haue to aunfA'er , bur that
they rtmlbe compelled toconfcfle that all is vnprofitable , that the
pneft pronounceth of the forgeuenefle of thofe finnes thar he hath
heard rehearfed , fo long as the other finnes are not deliuered from
cond«mnati5. On the behalf of him y confelfeih how hurtfall care-
fulnefle holdeth his confcience bo^ind , appereth hereby , that when
he refteth vpon tlie prices dircrction,as they callit,he can determine
nothing certainly by y word of God- The dodrine that we teach is
free and cleare from all thefe abfurdities.Fcr the abfolution is condi-
tional!, ihat the (inner fhould truft that God is merciful! vnto him,
Co that he sincerely feeke the clean'in^^ of his finnes in the facrificc
of Chnft, and obeye the grace offred him. So he can not errc,which
according to tr.e office of a preacher, proclaimeth that which is ge-
uenhimin inftructions by the word of God. And the firmer may
embrace a fure and cleare abfolution, when that fimplecon:lition is
annexed of the embracing the grace of Chr;ft,3ccording to thatge-
nerall dodrine of the maiikr himlelfe , Be it done to thee according Matr.f.
to thy faith Which hath bena wickedly defpifed in the Pap^cie. ^9*
2^ How fooliflily they confound thofe things that the Scripture
teachcth of the power of keyes , 1 hsue promifed tiiatl will fpeakc
in an other place , and there fhalbe a more conucnient place for it,
when I come to entreate of the gouernement of the Church. But let
the readers remeber tha: thofe things are wrongfully wrtfted to Au-
ricular and fecret conf( (lion, which are fpoken by Chrift partly of the
preaching of the Gofpell,and partly of excomunication. Wherefore
when they obied that the power of loofing is geuen to the Apoftles,
which priefts may vfe in forgeuing finnes acknowledged vnto them,
it is phine that they take a falfe and fonde principle:becaufe the ab-
folution thatferucth faith,is nothing; els but a witncffe of pardo take
out of the free promife of the Gofpell. As for the other confeflion,
that hangeth vpo the d'fcipline of the Church,it percaineth nothing
to fecre: finnes, but rather to example,that common offence of the
Cap4. Of the manerhov7 to rccciue
Church may be taken away. Buc wheras they fcrapc together here
and there teftiraonies,to proue chat it fufficcth not to confelTc finncs
cither to God onely or to lay men , vnlcfie a prieft be the hearer of
them , their trauailc therm is but lewd , and fuch as they may be a-
Ihamed of. For when the auncienc fathers counfell (inners to vnbiir-
den thcmfelues to their owne paftour , it can not be expounded of
particular rehearfall which then was not in vfe. Then, Lumbard and
fuch ljke(fuch was their finifter dealing) feme of fctpurpofc to bauc
geu£n themfelucs to faincd bokes , by prefcnfe whereof they might
deceiue the fimple. They do in deede truely confeffe , ihat becaufe
abfolution alway accompanieth repentance,thcrc fore there proprel/
remaineth no*bond when a man is touched with repentance , al-
though he haue not yet confeffed^and therefore that then the prieft
doth not fomuch forgeue (innes as pronounce and declare them for-
geuen. Albeit in the word of d^iaringthey llily bring in a groffc
errour , thrufting a ceremonie in ftede of dodnnc. But wheras they
patche vnto itjthat he is abfolued in the face of the Church that had
alredy obteined pardon before God : they do inconueniently drawe
to y peculiar vfe of euery particular man,that which we haue already
faid to be appointed for common difcipHne , where the ofFenfe of a
hainous and notorious fault is to be taken away. But by and by after,
they depraue and corrupt moderation , addmg an other manner of
forgeuing , with an enioyning of penaltie and fatisfadion > wherin
they prefumptuoufly claime to their owne facrifices a power to pare
that in halfes , which God hath in all places promifed vs whole to-
gether. For when he fimply requireth repentance and faith,this par-
tition or exceptio is a very robberic of 4God.For it is in cffed afmuch
as if the prieft taking vpon the perfone of a Tribune, (hould become
interceflbur to God, and would not fuffer God of his mere liberalitic
to receiue him into fauour , that hath lien proftrate before the Tri-
bunes feates,and there hath bene punifhed.
14 The whole fumme commeth to this point, that if they will
make God the authour of this counterfait cofeflion, therein is their
foUfliod condemned, as I haue proued them falfe forgers in the fcvve
places that they allege. But fith it is euident that it is a law made by
men,I fay that it is both tiranicall apd made iniurioufly againft God,
who binding mens confciences to his vvord,will haue them free from
the bondage of men. Now when for the obteining of pardon,there
is a neceffitie prefcribed of that thing which the Lorde wolde to be
free ,1 fay that this is a facrilege not to be fuflied > bycaufc there is
nothing more properly belonging to God , than to forgeue (rnnes,
wherein
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j. ^6^
wherein confiltcth ialuation for vs . Moreouer I haue fliewcd thac
this cirannie was firft brought in, when the world was oppreflbd with
filthy barbaroufnefle.I haue alfo taught that ic is a pcftilent law, that
cither throwech downe hedlong into defperation the poore foulcs
in whom Co euer abideth a feare of God : or where there reigneth
carelcfneSjdeliteth the with vayne flatteries, & Co maketh the duller.
Laft of alllhaue declartd,that what fo euer mitigations they bring,
tend to no other ende , but to entangle , darken and dcpraue pure
dodrine,and hide vngodlinefle with deceitfull colors.
25^ The third place in Repentance they affigne to fatisfadion, libr. 4,
whereof all that euer they babble raay be ouerthrowen with one Scntec
worde. They fay that it is not enough for him that repenteth,to ^'^^'"c.
abfteine from his former euels, and chaunge his behauior into bet- . ^^ ^5
ter , vnleflchc make fatisfadion to God for thofe thinges that he fufficit.
hath done : And that there be many helpes by which we may re- *^« V^^'
deme (innes,as wepinges/aftinges^oblations and the workes of cha- "-["e***
ritie.With thefe we muft winne the Lord to be fauorablc,with thefc ^^f^ ^^,
we muft pay our dettes to the rightcoufneife of God , with thefe we nullus.
muft make amendesfor our defaultes , with thefe we muft deferue cadcm
pardon.For although by thelargenes of his mercy he hath forgcucn '*
our faulte, yet by the difcipline of his iuftice he reteineth the peine,
and that this is' the peine that muft be redcmed with fatisfaitions.
But in cffed all that they fay commcth to this point , that we do ia
deedc obteine pardon of our finnes at the mercifulneflc of God,
but by meanes of the deferuingof our workes , by which the ofFenfc
of our finnes may be recompenfed,thar due fatisfadion may be fully
made to Gods righteoufnefle. Againft fuch lies. I fet tlie free forge-
uenefle of finneSjthan which there is nothing more euidetly fpoken
of in the Scripture. Firft, what is forgcuenefte, but a gift of mere li- EHi, 5*.
beralitie?For the creditour is not faid to forgcue,that acknowlcdgeth ^
by acquitance that the mony is payed, but he that without any pay 3°"*'^
mentwillmgly of his ownehberaluie cancel leth the detters bonde. CoioC
Secondly , why is this word, Freely, added, but to take away all opi- 2.1 4-
nion of fatisfadion?With what conHdcnce therefore do they yet fet T«t.}.^
vp their fatisfadionSjtbat are ftncken downe with fo mighty a thun-
derbolt?Butwhat?when y Lord cricthoutby Efay,ItisI,!tis I,thatdo Era.4j.
put away iniquities for mine owne fake > and will nor be mindefull of * ^
thy finnes : doth he not openly declare , that he fetcheth the caufe
and fundationoffoigeuenelfe only from his ownc goodnes?More-
ouer whereas the whole Scripture beareth this witnclle of Chnft, A6ti%
that forgeuencfle of finnes is to be receiued by his name, doth it not ^ i-
Cap.4. Of the maner how to receiuc
thereby exclude all other names? How then do they teache that it is
receiucd by thename of fatisfadions ? Neither can they dcnie thdz
they giuc this to fatisfadions,ahhough they fay that the fame be vfed
as helpes by way of meanes. For whereas the Scripture faith By the
name of Chrift,it meaneih that we bring nothing, we allege nothing
of ourowncjbut rcfte vpon the oncly commendation of Chrift. As
2.Cor.5 Paule, where he affirmeth that God is reconciling the world to him
^* felfe in Chrift, for his fake not imputing to men their finnes, he im-
mediatly (heweth the meane and rnanner how : bycaufe he that was
without finne.was made (mne for vs.
^Lihv. J. i^ But (fuch is their perucrfnefTe) they fay that both forgeufc-
Sentct nefleoffinnes and reconciliation are performed both at one time,
oilt 9- when we are in Baptifmc recciued into the fauour of God by Chrift:
that after baptifme we muft rife againe by fatisfa(ftions : and that the
bloud of Chrift profiteth nothmg,but fo far Ss it is dilbibutcd by the
keyes of the Church.Neither do I fpeakc of a doubtefull matter,for
afmuch as they haue in moft euident writinges bewrayed their ownc
filthinefre,and not one or two of chemjbut all the Scholemen vnnief-
fally. For their Maifter , after that he had confefled that Chrift had
payed the penaltie of finncs ?pon the tree , according to the dodri-
j.Pct.2. ncQf Peter 5 immediatlycorredeth his faying with adding this ex*-
2%im ceptic>n,that in baptifme all temporal! penalties of finncs are reJca-
1.9. fedjbut after baptifme they are minifhed by the helpe of pcnaunce»
that fo the crofiTe of Chrift and our penaunce may workc together.
i.Ioh.a But lohn faith far otherwife, if any (inne, we haue an aduocate with
a.& 1 2. th(. Father,euen lefus Chrift,which is the propitiation for our (innes.
I write vnto you children , bycaufe your finncs are forgeuen you for
his names fake. Truely he fpeakcth to the faithful!, to whom when
he fettcth forth Chrift to be the propitiation* of finnes , he fheweth
that there is no other faiisfadton by which God , being difpleafcd,
may be made fauorablc and appeafed. He doth not fay : God was
ones reconciled vnto you by Chrift,now fcekc you other meanes. but
he makcth him a perpetuall aduocate , alway to reftoie vs by his in-
tercefl'ion into the fauour of his father: a perpetuall propitiation jby
which our finncs may be clcanfedaway. For this is euer true that the
John.i. other lohn faid: Beholdc,thc Lambe of God ,beholde him that
2^' taketh away the finnes of ihe world.He taketh them away (faith !)c)
himrelfeandnoncother,thatis to fay: for afmuch as he atone is the
Lambe of God, he alone alfo is thi; oblation for finncs, he alone the
propirintion ficrificc, he alone the fatisfa<ftion. For wheras the right
and power to forgcuc bclogcth proprely to the father,in the refpeft
that
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 5d^4
that he rsTdiftinguifhed from the fonnCjas \vc hauc alredy fcnciChriil
is here fct in an other degree , that taking vpon himfelfe the paine
due vnro vs,he hath taken away our giltinefle before the iudgemene
of God. Wherevpon foloweih , the we (hall no othcrwife be parta-
kers of the fatisfadion made by Chrift, vnlefle the fame honour rc-
mainc whole with him,which they do wrongfully take to themfelucis
that go about to appeafc God with their owne recompenfinges,
X7 And here it is good to conlider two thingcs:tnat Clirift may
hauc his due honour kept vnto him whole and ynminiihedrand that
the confciences being aflured of the forgeuenellc of finne,may hauc
peace with God. Efaye faith , that the father hathlaycd the iniquities Ef* S :>
of vs all vpon his fonne , that wc fhouldc be healed by his ftripes. "^p
Which thing Peter rehcarfing in other wordes faith : that Chrift did '
in his body beare our finnes vpon the tree. Paule writeth that finne Rom,8.
was condemned in hisflelh , when he was made finne for vs. That is j-
to fay, that the force and curfe of finne was flaine in his flefli , when ^^^^ *•
he was geuen to be a facrificc , vpon which the whole heape of our *'
finnes, with all their maledidion and curfe, with the dredfuU iiidgc-
ment of God,and condemnation of death fhouldbc caft.Here thofc
triflinges are in no cafe to be hcard,that after the firft purging, euery
one of vs doth none otherwifefele theefFeduaJnefle of the palTioii
of Chrift , than after the meafure of fatisfadoric repentance : but Co
oft as We fall j we be called backe to the onely fatisfadion of Chrift,
Now fet before thee their peftilent follies, as for example : That the
grace of God woiketh alone in the firft forgeuenefle of finnes : that
if we afterwarde fall, to the obtcining of a fecondc forrgcuenefle our
workcs do worke with it. If thcfe thinges may haue place , do thcfe
thinges that arc here before afligned to Chrift rcmaine fafcvnto
him?It his a meruellous greate difference , bctwene this that our ini-
quities arelayed vpon Chrift, that they fiioulde be cleanfed in him,
, & this that they arc cleanfed by our owne workes ."bctwene this that
Chrift is the procuringe of mcrcie , and this that God muft be made
mercifull by workes. But if we fpeakc ofpacifiengtheconfcienccr
what pacification fliallthisbe foramaiisconfcience,tohearethac
his finnes arc redemed by fatisfadions ? When fhall he ccrtaincly
knowe the meafure of his CjtisfadioJ'Therfore he ftiall alway doubtc
whether he hauc God mercifull or ao , he ftiall alway be vexed , and
alway quake for feare.For they that reft vpon light pety fatisfadions,
do too contemptuoufly eftem"? the judgement of God , and do liilc
confider how great is the greuoufneflc of finne , as we ihall declare
in an other placc.But ahliough we graut them to red».aic fomc finnes
Cap. 4. Of the maner how to receaic
with luft fatisfadion : yet what will they do when they arcopprefied
with Co many finnes,for fatisfadio wherof a hundredliues although
they were wholy applied therunto can not fufficc? Befide that,all the
places wherin the forgeuenefle of finnes is affirmed, do not belong to
yonglinges, but to the already regenerate childre of God, and them
tbathaue bene long nourifhed in the bofome of the Church. That
2 Cor. embaffage which Paule fo honorably extolleth , 1 befech you in ihe
i'io, name of God , be ye reconciled vnto God , is not diredcd to ftraun-
gcrs, but to them that had bene already regenerate.But he, biddingc
fatisfadions farewell, fendeth them to the crolfe of Chrift. So when
OJolofT. he writeth to the Coloffians ,that Chrift by the bloud of the croffc
i'io. hath pacified all thinges in heauen or in earth5he reftraineth not this
to the oncly moment wherein we are receiued into the Church,buc
cxtendeth it to our whole courfc. Which eafily appcreth by the pro*
cefTe of the text,where he faith, that the faitbfuU haue a redemption
by the bloud of Chrift, that is forgeueneffe of linnes. Albeititisfuf
perfluous to heape together mo places , that redily offer themfelucs
to be founde.
28 Here they flee to the fanduarie of the foolifti diftindion,that
fome finnes are veniall, and fome deadly: that for deadly iinnes is
great fatisfadion due , that veniall (innes are purged with more eafy
rcmedies,as with faying of the Lords prayer ,with fprinkling of holy
water, with abfolution at the mafle. So they mockeand trifle with
God. But whereas they nlway haue in their mouth veniall and deadly
finne, yet they coulde neuer difcerne the one from the other, fauing
that they make yngodlines and vncleanneflfe of heart,a veniall finne.
Rom. 6. gyj. ^g ^25 jl^g Scripture the rule of right and wrong tcacheth vs) do
Exe. 18. P'onounce,that the rewarde of finne is death^and that the foule that
ao.* finncih is worthy of death. But that the finnes of the faithful are vc-
B.om.8. niall,not for that they do not deferue death , but bycaufe by the
'• mercie of God there is no condemnation to them that arc in Chrift
IcfuSjbecaufc they are not imputed : bycaufe they are taken away by
pardo. I know how vniuftly they fclaundcr this our dodrine.For they
lay,rhat it is the Stoikes ftraunge conclufion,concerning the cqualitic
of finnrs. But they fliall eafily be conuinced by their owne mouth.
Fori demaunde of them, whether among the very fame finnes that
they cofelFe to be deadly ,they do not acknowledge one to be greater
than an other.It doth not therefore immediatly followe,that finnes
are cgall , becaufe they are all together deadly. When the Scripture
dcfinitiuely faiib,that the reward of finne is death,rhat the obcdiecc
of the lawe is the way of life , and that the iranfgvcflion of the lawc
is death.
The grace of Chrift. Lb.3. 2^5
is death , they cannot efcape this fentence. What end of fatisfieng
rhen will they finde in fogreataheapeof iinnes? Ifthe fatisfadion Pro. 24.
of one day be the fatisfadion of one finne, while they are about that * ^*
one fatisfadion , they wrappe thtmfelues'in many finnes,(ithe the
iufteft man palTeth no one day whtrin he falltth not many times.
Now when thcyfliall prepare themfelues to make fatisfadion for
ihefe finncs, they fhall heape vp great numbers, yea rather innume-
rable. Then the hope of faiisheng being cut of, what do they ftay
vpon? how dare they ftill thinke of fatisfieng?
29 They go about to winde out themfelues : but (as the pro*
uerbe is) the water ftill cleaueth vpon them.Thcy forge a diliindion
of fault and penaltie. 1 hci confelie that the fault is forgeuen by the
mercie of God, but that when the fault is forgeucn, the penaltie re-
maineth which the righteoufnefie of God requircth to be payedrand
that fatisfadions do properly belong to the releafc of the penaltie.
Good Godjwhat a fkipping lightncfle is this?' now they confeflt- that
the forgeucnefleof the faulchethfreely open for men, which fome-
time they teache men to deferue with prayers and wepinges, and all
other kindcs of preparations. But yet ftill all that is taught vs in the
fcripture concerning the forgcuenefle offinneSjdothdiredly Hghc
againft this diftmdion. Which ahhough I thinke that I haue alredy
more than fufficiently confirmed,yet I will adde fome other teftimo-
nies whcrwith thefe winding fnakes may be holden fo faft,ihat they
ihallnotbeableonestofoldeinthetoppeoftheir taile. This is the
neweTeftament which the Lorde hath couenanred with vs in his icr. 31.
Chrift, that he will not remember our iniquities. What he meant by 3 1.
thefe wordes, we learnc by an other Prophet where the Lorde faith; E2,e.iS,
If the righteous turne away from his righreoufnefle , I will not re- l^' g
member all his righteoufnefles. Ifthe wicked depart fro his wicked- ,/ *
neife , I will not remember all his iniquities. Wheras he faith that he
will not remember their righteoufnefiejthis is afmuch to fay, that he
will haue no regard of them in refped to reward thcm.Therforc not
to remember finnes,is afmuch as not to call them to punifhmcnt.Thc Efa.44,
fame thing is called in an other place , to caft it behinde his backe, to ^\'
wipe it away like a cloude , to drowneit in the bottome of the fea, ^^^ 7-
not to impute it and to hide it. By fuch manners of fpeche the holy '^*
Ghoft doth plaincly exprcfte his meaning vnto vs,if we would apply
vnto him wiUing earcs to learne. Truely if God do punifli finnes , he Pfa. }|,
imputeththem :if hctakethvengcancc,heremcmbrcththem:ifhe '*•
call them to iudgement,he doth not hide them:if he examinc.them,
he doth noc caft them behinde liis backe : if he loke vpon them, he
Cap.4* Of the maner how to recciuc
hath not wiped them away hke a cloudc : if he fift them,he hath not
pra. $1, caft them into the bottome of the fca. And in this manner doth Au-
^' guftine expound ic in plaine wordes.lf God haue couered (innes,then
he would not loke vpon themiif he would not loke vpon thcm^then
he would not marke thcmrif he would not marke thcjthen he would
not puni(h them : he would not knowe them , he had rather pardon
ihem.Why therefore did he fay that finnes were couered, that they
fliould not be feen-.What was meant by this that God did fee finnes,
but that he did punifli them ? But htvsheare alio out of an other
place of the Prophet, vpon what conditions theLorde forgeueth
Efa.!- finnes. If(faith he) your finnes be as fcarlet, they (hail be made white
« 8. as fnow : if they be red like crimofin,they {hall be as woU. And in le-
ler. 50. remie we read thus : In that day the iniquitie of lacob fhalbc fought
^^' for, and{haUnotbefounde:thefinneofIudah, and it (hall not be.
Becaufe I will be fauorable to the remnantes that I fhall preferue;
Wilt thou briefcly vnderftand what is the meaning of thofe wordes?
Tob.14. Weye on the other fide what is meant bythefe fpeches : that the
' 7. Lorde doth binde vp iniquities in a facke , doth gather them into a
O'ee.13 boundell and laye them vp,& doth graue them with an iron pointell
ier!i7. *"^" Adamant ftone. If they fignifie (as it is out of doubt) that ven-
I. * * geancelhalbegeuenforrecopenfejthenisitalfonottobe doubted,
but that by contrarie fentences the Lorde affirmeth , that he remit-
teth all recompenfins: of vengeance. Here I muft befech the readers
not to barken to my glofes, but onely that they wiU fuSer the worde
of God to take fome place.
50 Whar,I pray you,had Chrift done for vsjifwe fhould ftill be
i.Pct.2 compelled to fufter painc for finnes ? For wheri we fay that he did
24. beare all our finnes in his body vpon the tree , we mcanc nothing els
thereby , but that he fuffred all the peine and punifhment that was due
Hfa. 5 3. to our finnes . And the fame hath Efaye more liueiy declared where
5* he faith : the chaftifemet (or corredion) of our peacejwas vpon himw
What is the corredion of our peace but the peine due to finnesPand
which we fhould haue fuffred before that we could be reconciled to
Rom. 5. Godjvnleffc that he had entred into our ftede? Lo,thou feeft plainc-
*'^- ly,that Chrift fufFred the peines of finnes , to deliuer them that be
^ o °'^** his firom rhem. And fo oft as Paule maketh mention of the redemptio
I phe.i. performed by Chrift^he vfcth to call it in Grcke Jpolutrojtn^ where-
V- by he mcaneth not onely redemption, as it is commonly takcn.but
ColoCi. the very price and fatisfadion of redemption. After which manner he
! Tim. writcth,that Chrift gaue himfelfe JntUutron,7i price of raunfome for
». 6. VS. What propitiation is there with the Lorde (faich Auguftine) but
facrifice?
The grace of Chrlft. Lib. 3. 266
facrifice? And what facrifice is there, but thnt which is offred for vs in
the death of Chrift ? But that which is appointed in the lawe of Mo-
fes for clcanfing the oft'enfes of (innes , niiniftreth vs n flrong battell
ramme. For the Lord doth not there apointthisor that manner of
fatisfieng,biit rec^uireth the whole- recoiDpenfe in facrifices. Where-
as yet in other fhinges, hedothmoft diligently sndinmoll cxaft
order fet out all the ceremonies of expiation. Kowe commcth ic to
pa(re,that he commaundeth to rccompenfe faukes committed , with
no workes at ,ill,but requireth oncly facrifices for latisfadion.-but be-
caufe his will is fo to declare , that there is onely one kinde of fatif-
fadion , whereby his iudi emeiu is appeafed ? For the facrifices that
the Ifraelices did then ofter , were noiweyed by the worke of men,
but were eftemcd by their truch, that is to fay, by the oneiy facrifice
of Chrift. But what manner of recompenfe the Lord receiut'th of vs,
Ofee hath very well exptelTed in fcwe wordes. Thou {holt (laith he) ofce,
take away iniquiticj O God. Loe, here isforgeueneiTcof finnes. And »4.3.
wefliall pay thee calues of our lippes .-Loe, here is fatisfadlion. I
knovve that they yet do futtclly flippe away,vvhen they make dlftinc-
tion betwene euerlaftmg peine>and tem.porall pcine.s.But when they
teach that temporall peine is any kinde of punifliment that God ta-
kcth as well of the body as of the foulc > except onely euerlaftin^
deathjthis reftraining of it doth litle hclpe them. For the places that
wc haue aboue recited, do exprefly meane rhis, that God receiueth
vs into fauour with this condition , that in pardoning the fault , he
pardoneth all the peine what fo cner we had thereby deferiied. And
(b oft as Dauid or the other Prophets do craue pardo offinnes, they
do alfo there writhall prayto be rcleafedofthe pemc.Yea,ihe very
feling of Gods iudgement doth dnue them therunto.Againe, when
they promife mercie at the Lordes hand , they do in manner alway
of purpofe preach of the peines and the forgeuencffe therof.Truely
when the Lorde in Ezechiell pronounceth that he will make an ende Ere. j(f
of the exile in BabyIon,and that for his owne fakcnot for the lewes ^^' ^^^^
fake , he doth fufficiendy fhewe that both are of free ^ift. Finally , if ^**
we be deliuered by Chrift from giltinefle of fault, the peines that
come thereof, muft needes ceflc.
3 1 But for afmuch as they do alfo arme themfelues with tefti-
monics of Scripture,let vs fee what manner of argumentes thofe bee
that they aJlcge. Dauid ( fay they ) being rebulced byNnthanthe a.Sam.
Prophet of adulierje and maflaughter,receiucd pardon of his finne, '*•' 5*
and yet he was afterward punifhcd by the death of his fonne that he
had gotten by that adulterie. We are taught to redeme with farif-
LL I)
Cap.4. Of the manerhow to rcceiae
fadions iuch paines as were to be extended after forgeuencs of the
Dan. 4. fault. For Daniel aduifed Nebuchadnezer to redcme his finnes with
?+ almes. And Salomon writeth that for equitie and godlineflc ,iniqui-
6!^& ic* ^'^^ ^^^ forgeuen. And in an other place, that withcharitie the mul-
1 2. titode of finnes is couered. Which fentence Peter alfo confirmetb.
I. Pet. 4 Againe,in Luke the Lord faith of the woman that was a finner,that
many finnes are forgeuen her , becaufe fhe hath loued much. Howe
peruerfly and wrongfully ihey cuer weye the doinges of God. But if
they had marked ( as they fiiould not haue ouerpafled it ) that there
are two kindes of Gods iudgemenr,thcy would haue fcen in this re-
buking of Dauid , a far other manner of puniiliment, than fuch as
Tnight be thought to tend to reucngement. But bycaufc it not a litle
behoueth vs all to vndcrftand wherunto the chaftit^mentes haue reC-
peft,wherwith God correfteth vs for our finnes,and how much they
differ from thofe examples wherewith he purfueth the wicked and
reprobate with indignation : therefore I thinke it fhall be not befide
the purpofe to comprehend it fiiortly in a fumme. For the order of
plaine teaching , let vs call the one kinde of judgement, the iudegc-
nient of Reuenge,the other of Chaftifemet.It is to be vnderftanded^
that God fo punifheth his enemies with the iudgement of reuenge*
that he vfeih his wrath againft them,cGnfoundeth rhem , deftroyeth
chem,and bringeih them to nought. Therefore let vs take that to be
properly the vengeance of God , when his jpunifhing is ioined with
his indignationrwith the iudgement of Chauifemct he dealeth not fa
cruelly:as to be angryrnor punifheth to dcftroy,nor fendeih downc
his lightening to kill.Therefore it is not properly punifhment or vcn-
geance,but corredion and admonifhmcnt. The one is the domg of
aiudgc, the other of a father. For the iudgewhenhe punifhethan
cuell doer,he hath regard to the offenfe, & punifheth the very fauh:
when the father fomwhat rigoroufly corredeth his childe,he doth it
not to be reuenged on himjor to punifh him,but rather to teach him
& make him warer in time to come. Chryfoftome in a certaine place
vfeth a fimilitude fomwhnt diflering from this,but yet it commeth to
the fame point.Thc fonne ( faith he) is beaten , and the feruant alfo
is beatcnrbut the one is puniflied as a bondeferuant,bycaufc he hafh
efFended,and the other is chaftifed as a freeman and as a fonne,nc-
dingcorredion. To the one hiscorredion ferueth for profe and a*
inendement,to the other for a fcourge and punifhmcnt.
^ z But that we may haue the whole matter fhortly and in a redy
fummejlet this be the firft of two dilhndions. Whercibeucr punifh*
oeni IS CO reuengejchere fhewcth ic fdf the curfe and wrath of God,
which
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j. i6j
which he alway wzthholdeth from the fjithfiill. Contrarywifc Chaf- lob. j,
tifcment both isabltfling of God,andbearetha tcftimonie of his '7*
Joue, as the Scripture teacheth. This diftlrence is commonly eucry i[°""^
where fufficiently cxprefled in the worde of God. For what fo eutr Heb 1 2
afflidions the wicked fuft'cr in this prefenthfc , therein is painted out 5.
vnto vs as it were a certainc entrie of helljfio whenfe they do alredy
fee a far of their eternall damnation : and they are fo far from being
amended or taking any profit thereby ,that raiher by fuch beginings
ihey arc prepared to the moft cruell hell that at length abideth for
them. But the Lorde chaftihng chaftifeih his feruantes , but he doth Pft.io*
not put them to death . Therefore they confefle that 10 be beaten p^*' *
with his rodde , was good for them vnto true inftruftion. But as we ,y[
read euery where that the holy ones fuffer fuch punifhmenrcs with
quiet minde , fo they haue alway prayed to efcape the fii It kinde of
fcourges. Chaftfe me Lorde (faith leremie) but in thy iudgemcnc, lere.ic
not in thy vvrath,leaft thou deftroy me.Poure out thy wrath vpon the 1 4.
nations that haue not knowen thee , and vpon the kingdomes that
haue not called vpon thy name. And Dauid faith : Lorde rebuke me Pfa.tf.i
not in thy wrath , nor corred me in thine anger. And it maketh no- & 3^ *
thing to the contrariCjthat oftentimes it is faid,that the Lord is angry
with rhem that be his , when he punifheth their finncs. As in Efaye; Efa.is.i
I will confelTe to thee O Lorde , becaufe thou haft bene angry with
me ; thy wrath is turnedsSc thou haft comforted me.Againe Abacuc. Kaba j
Thou that haft bene angry (hall remember mercie. AndMichee:! **. ,
will beare the wrath of the Lordjbecaufe 1 haue finned againft him. '^ *^'
Where he putteth vs in minde that not onely they that are iuftly pu~
nifhcd, nothing preuaile with murmuring againft him , but alfo that
the faithfull haue afwagement of their forrow,in confidering the pur^
pofe of God. For after the fame manner it is faid that he doth defile
his ownc inheritancejV/hich yet fas we knowe) he will neucr defile.
But that is fpoken not in refped of the purpofe or meaning of God
that punifheth, but of the vehement felmg of forrow, which they
fele that fuffer any of his fcueritie what fo cuer it be.But he not only
pricketh his faithfull with no fmal rigour,but fometimes fo woudeth
lhem,that they thinke themfclues not far from the damnatio of hell.
So he teftifieth that they haue deferued his wrat h,and fo it behoueth
that they fhould loth'ihemfelues in their eucls,and be touched with
the greater care to appeafe God , and carefully make haft to craue
pardon.But euen in the very fame doing he flieweth a more euidene
teftimonie of his fauorable kindenefle than of his wrath. For y coue«
nanc c^tinueth that was made with vs in our true Salomon:tnc uuch
LL iij.
Cap. 4. Of the maner how to receluc
whereof he that can nocdec^^rne >hadi affirmed, that it fhallncuer
fa. 8^. bee made voide.If (faith he) his children fotfike my lawe,andwalkc
'• not in my iudgementsrif they defile. my ftatutcs , and kepe not my
commaundememes. I will viiite their finnes witharodde and with
ftripes : but I will not take away my mercie from him. Of which
mercie to make vs afl'ured , he faith , that the rodde wherewith he
I.Sam, will corrcd the poiteritie of Salomon , Ihalbe of racnne , and ftripes
•»4. of the childrcnof mennc*. by which daufes when he meaneth mo-
deration and icnitie,hc therewithall fecretly declareth,that they can
not but bee confounded with extreme and deadly horrour, that fele
the hand of God to be againft th.m. Howe great regard he hath of
Ha. 48. this Icnitie in chaftiling his Ifracl!,he flicwcth in the Prophet:! hauc
0. purged thee(i^^ith he)m fire^But nor as Siluefjfor then thou Hiouldeft
haue bene all confumed. Albeit he teacheth that ch^jftifementes
fcruc hi>n for to cleanle him , but he further faith that he vfeth the
fame fo tempecatcly , that he bee not to much confumed by them.
And that is needcfull. For the more that euery man reuerently tea^
reth Godjnnd geueth himfclfe to follow godhnefle/o much the ten*
drer he is to beare his wrath For the reprobate,although they grone
vndqr his fcourges , yet for that they wey not the caufe , but rather
turne their backe both to their owne Hnnes and ro the iudgemenc
of God , by that flouthfulnejle they gather a hardnelfc : or bycaufe
they murmure and kickc againft h:m, and do make an vprore againft
iheir iuJge , that furious fuddcn ra>j;c aftonieth them with madnefle
and furor. But thefaithfull being adraonifhed by his corredion,by
and by defcend to confider their linnes, & being ftrikeii with dread
and horrour, they flee in humble wife to pray to him for pardcn,vn-
lefle the Lorde did afwa^e thefe forrowes wherewith the poorc fou-
les torment themfelues , they would fainte a hundred times euen in
fmal tokens of his wrath.
^5 Then let this be the feconddift!n6lion,that when the repro-
bate are ftryken with the fcourges of God , they do alrcdy after a
certaine manner beginne to fuffcr peines by his iudgemet,and though
theyfliall not efcapevnpuniflied, for that they haue not taken hede
to fuch tokes of the wrath of God , yet they are not punifhcd to this
ende, to make them come to a better minde : but o;iely that; to their
great hurt , they fliouid prouc God to be a iudge and reuenger. But
children are beaten with roddes , not that they (houldc thereby be
puniftied of God for their finnes, but that they fhould therby profit
to amendement. Therefore we take it that they rather haue refpeft
to the time to come,than to the time paftThis I had rather cxprcflc
The grace of Chnlt. Lib.3 . 2 ^8
m Chryfoftomes wordes than mine owne. For this (faith he) God In Term,
doth by peine vpon vs , not puniHiing our finnes paft, but correding ^.^ y^'
vsagainil time to come. And So faith Auguftine : That which thou confeff.
fufFreft, that for which thou lamented , is a medicine to thee and no
p;ine , a chaftifement and no damnation. Put not away the fcourgc,
if thou wilt not be put away from the inheritance,&c. Know ye bre-
thren that all this miferic of mankinde when the woild groneth is a
medicinall forrow, and not a pennall fentence,&c. Thefe fentences
I haue theiefore thought good to allcage,that the manner of fpeche
that 1 haue aboue written , {houlde not feme to any man newc and
vnufed. And hereunto ferue all the complaintes full of indignation
wherein the Lorde oftentimes doth expoftulaie of the vnkindenefle
of the pcople,for that they ftiffly defpifed all punifliments. In Efaye Efa. i.y.
he faith:To what purpofe lliould I ftrike you any more:from the fole
of the foote to the crowne of the hed , there is no whole place. But
bccaufe the Prophets are full of fuch fayinges , it fhalbe fufficient to
haue briefly fhswed that God doth punilh his Church for none othec
intent, but that it (houlde be tamed and amend. Therefore when he
did caft Saul out of the kingdpmejhe punifhed him to rcuengement: i.Sam.
When he toke from Dauid his yonge fonne , he correded him to ^5** ?•
amendement . According to this meaning is that to be taken which *^^^'
Paule faithjwhen we are ludged of the Lorde, we are corrcded,that ^ cor.
we ihould not be damned with this worlde.That is, when we that be 11.31.
the children of God arc afflided with the hande of our heauenly fa-
ther, this is no peine wherewith we ihould be confoundedjbut only
a chaftifement wherewith we iliould be inftrufted. In which pointe
Auguftine isplainely onour fide. For he teacheth that the peines tib.de
wherewith men are a like chaftifed by God, ar diuerfly to be confi- Pecca-
dered : bycaufe to the holy ones they are battels and exercifcs after j.°co"a^c
the forgeucneffe of their finnes ,to the reprobate they are without remift.
forgeuenefte peines of wickedneffe. In which place he rehearfeth cap. ?j,
how peines were layed vpon Dauid and other godly men , and faith ^ 34«
that the fame tended to this ende,that theirgodlineflefhoulde by
fuch humbhng of them , be exercifed and proued. And where Efaye Efa 40,
faith, that the tewifh people had their iniquitie forgeuen them , by- ••
caufc they had rcceiued full chaftifement at the Lordcs hande : this
proueth not that the pardon of finnes hangeth vpon the full pai-
ment of the peinerbut it is in efFed afmuch as if he had faid: Bycaufe
ye haue alredy fuffr ed peines enough , and by the greuoufnefle and
multitude thereof haue bene now pined away with longe mourning,
and forrowc , therefore itisnowe time that receiuing the tidinges
LL iiij
Cap,
4. Of the maner how to recciue
of full mercie , your heartes fhocftde reioyce and fele me to be your
father . For there God did take vpon him the perfon of a father,
which repenceth him euen of his iufte feucritie , when he was com-
pelled {harply to correft his fonne.
^4 With thefe thoughtes it is neceflarie that the faithftill be Fur-
i.Pet.4, nilhed in bitternelfeofaffliAions.lt is time that the iudgementbe-
'7. ganne at the houfe of the Lorde , in which his name is called vpon.
^er^- 5* \Yhat fhould the children of God dojif thev did beleue the feueritie
of God that they fele to be his vengeancePFor he that being ftrikcn
with the hand of God , ima^inech God a punifhing iudge , can not
conceiue him but angry and enemie vnto him , and deteft the very
fcourgeofGod as a curfe and damnation. Finally he can neuer be
perfwaded that God loueth him, that fhall thinke him fo minded to-
ward him, that he is ftill minded to punifh him. But he only proHteth
vnder the rod of God,that thinketh him to be angry with his hnnes,
but merciefuU & louin?,e to himfelfe.For ocherwife that muft needcs
nappen,which the Prophet complaineih that he felt,where he faith.
Pfa S8« Thy wraths>0 God haue pafled ouer me:thy terrors haue opprelfed
*7* me. Aifothatwh«chMoreswnieth,bycau(e we haue fainted in thy
*• ^^* wrath ; and we haue bene troubled in thy indignation, thou haft fet
oui iniquities in thy fight,and our fecretes in the light of thy coun-
tenance : becaufe all oar dayes are gone away in thy wraih:our yeres
are confumed as the word that is pafled out of a mouth.On the other
fide Dauid faith thus of his fatherly cbaft:ifemenies,to teach that the
Pfa.p4, faithfuU are rather holpen than opprelfed thereby : BlcflTed is the
pf* «ft ^^^ whom thou haft correded O Lorde , and haft inftruded in thy
J J** • lawe,to geue him quiet from euell dayes, while a pit is digged for the
finner. Truely it is a harde tentation, when God (paring the vnbcle*
uers and winking at their faulteSjfemeth more rigorous againft them
that be his. Therefore he gaue them a caufe of comfort, the admo-
nifliment of the lawe , whereby they {houlde learne , that it is done
toprouidefor their faluation when they are called againe into the
way , and the wicked are caried hedlong into their errours , whofc
ende is the pit. And it is no difference whether the peine be euer-
lafting or during for a time. For as well warre,famine,peftilence,and
fickenelfeas theiudgcmentof eternall death are the curfesof God,
when they are layed vpon menne to this ende, to be inftrqmentes
of the Lordes wrath and vengeance againft the reprobate.
I J Nowe (as I thinke ) all men do perceiue whereunto tended
that chaftifement of the Lorde vpon Dauid:euen to be an inftrudion
chat God is greuouHy difpleafcd with manflaughter and adulterie»
again^
The grace ot Chrift. Lib.3 . 2 ep
againft which he had ihewed fo great an indignation in his beloued
and fauhfull feruam : that Dauid ihould be caught to be no more fo
bold to do y hke deede;8uiot to be a paine whereby he ihould make
a certaine rccompenfe to God . And fb is to be iudgtd of the other
kinde of corredion,wherby the Lord punilhed his people with a fore j.sa.a
pelblcnce,for Dauids duobedience wherinto he was fallen in num- i $»
bring v people.For he did in deede freely forgiue to Dauid the gilti-
ncffe of his ljnne:but becaufe it pertained both to the pubhke exam-
ple of all ages,and alfo to the humbling of Dauid,that fuch a hainous
ofFenfe Ihoulde notremayne vnpunillied : therefore he moft (haiply
chaftifed him with his rod . Which marke alfo we ought to haue be-
fore our eyes in the vniuerfall curfe of mankindc , For wheras after
pardon obtained,wc do all yet fuffer the miferies that were laid vpon
our firft parent for paine of (inneiwe perceiue our felues by fuch cx-
crcilcs to be admoniihed, how grieuoufly God is difpleafcd with the
tranfgrcilionof his law:that being throwen downe & humbled with
knowelcdge in confcience of our owne miferable eftace , we may the
more ferucntely afpire to true bleifednc> . But he (halbe moft foo-
li(h that Ihall thjnke,that the calamities of this prcfent bfe are layed
vpon vs for the giitines of linnc. And that 1 thinke was the meaning
of Chryfoilome when he wrote thus.If God do therefore lay pauies ^ ^
vpon vSjthat he (hould call vs,perfeucring in euils to repentace,then de pro
when repentance is once fliewed.the paine llialbe fuperfluous.Ther- uid. ad
fore , as he knoweth it to be expedient for euery mans nature, fo he Stargi-
handeleth one man more roughly, and an other with more louinge """*'
tei^derncfle. Therfore where he mindeth to teach that he is not vn-
meafurable in taking puniflimecs, he reprocheth to th« hard hearted
and obftinate people that being ftriken yet they make not an end of j
finning. In this meaninge he coplaineth, that Ephraim was as a cake ofe.v
fcorched on the one fide, and raw on the other, becaufe the corrc-
<3ion$ did not pearcc into their mindes, that the people hauing their
vices boyled out,might be made mecte to receiuc pardon.Truely he
that fo fpeaketh, fheweth, that fo foone as a man hath repented , he
will byandby become appeafabJeiand that by our ftifnej he is cnfor-
ced to that rigour in chaftifing of faulte$,which Hiould haue bin pre-
uented with wilhng amendement.Yetforafmuch as we all are of fuch
hardnes and rudenelTe, as vniuerfally needcth chaftifemet;it feemed
good to him being a moft wife father,to exercifc all without exceptio
with a comon fcourge all their life lon;^ But it is maruclous why they
fo caft their eyes vpon the only example of Dauid,& are not mouei
with fo many examples^in which they might haue behoUe free for«
\^ap.4. Uttlicmanerhowtoreceiuc
C.uk.i8.^iuenefleoffinnes,Iti$ read that the Publicane went out of the tc-
■^ pie iuftified . There followed no paine. Peter obtayned pardon of
jj * his offence, his teares we reade (fayth Ambrofe)his fatisfadion we
Mat. 2. read not . And the man ficke of the Palfey heard it fpoken to him;
^ Rife : thy finnes are forgiuen thee. There was nopaineiayedvpon
him. All the abfolutions that are rehearfed in the Scripture, are fet
out as giue freely. Out of this great nober of exampks,a rule fhould
rather haue bin gathered than of that only example that containeih
in it a certayne fpeciall matter.
Dan. 4. 36 Daniel in his exhortation wherin he coupfellcthNabuchad-
H* , nezer to rcdceme his finnes with righteoufneli'e , and his iniquities
with pityinge of the poore : his meaning was not to fay, that righte-
oufnelTe and mercy are (atisfadory appesfemenccsofGod, andre-
deption of paines ( for God forbid that there were euerany redep-
tio fauingonly the bloud of Chrift)but to referre this word Redee*
ming rather to men than to God,as if he had fayd:0 king, thou haft
vfed an vnrighteous and violent goruernment , thou haft oppreffcd
the humblcjthou haft fpoyled the poore,thou haft hardly and vniuft-
ly handled thy people:for thy vniuft exadions, for thy violence and
oppre{Iion,now render to them mercy and righteoufnefle. Likewife
*ro.io. Salomon fayth, that with charity the multitude of finnes is cduered:
*• not before God,but amongc men themfelues. For thus is the whole
verfe:Hatred raifeth vp contentions '.but charity coucreth all iniqui-
ties. In which verfe,as his maner is,he doth by way of comparifon of
contrariesjcompare the cuils that grow of hatreds,with the frutcs of
charityrin this meaninge, they that hate together,do one bite, barke
at.reproch and rayle at an other,and turne all things to the worft:but
they that louc together, do diflfemble many thinges amonge them-
felues , do winke at many thinges , and pardon many thinges one to
the other ; not that the one alloweth the others fauUes,but beareth
with thcm,and helpeth them with admoni{hinge,rather than galleth
i.Pct.4. them with rcproching them. And it is not to be douted that Peter al-
8. leageth this place in thefame fenfejvnlcfle we will accufe him of de-
Pro, »<?, prauingand wrongfully wrefting the Scripture. But whereas he tea-
cheth that finne is purged with mcrcifulnefle and liberality , he doth
not meane that recompcnfe is therewith made for finne before the
face of the Lorde , fo that God beinge appeafed by fuch facisfadion
doth releafe the paine that oiherwife he would haue layd vpon the,
but after the accuftomcd manner of the Scripture he declareth that
they (liall findc him mercifull vnto them that leauinge their former
vices andiniijuities , do turne to him by godlincs & trueth : as if he
fliouldo
6,
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 270
fiiould fayj that the wrath of God doth ceflfe and his judgement reft,
when we cede fro our cuill doingcs. Neither doth he there defcribc
rhecaufe ofpardo, but rather the maneroftrueconuerlion.As ma-
ny times the Prophets do declare that Hypocrites do in vaine pefter
God with forged ceremonious vfages in ftcde of repentance, wher-
as it is vprightncs of hfe with the duties of charity that dcliteth him
As alfo the author of the Epiftle to the Hcbrues commendinge libc- Hcb.i j
rality and gentleneire,teacheth that fuch facrifices pleafe God. And '^*
when Chnftjtauntingthe Phariftsthat giuinge heede only to clean- , ^^'^^
fingc ofdifhes, they negieded the cleannefle of the heart,commaun- Luc- n.
dedthemtogiue almes that all might be clcanerhe did not thereby 3 p.
cxhorte them to make fatisfadion: but only teacheth what maner of
cleannelTe pleafeth God. Of which kinde of fpeach we haue entrea-
ted m an other place.
^7 As touching the place of Luke, no man that hath with founde Luc.y,
Judgement read the parable that the Lord did there recire,willmake ^
vs any controuerfie thereupon. The Pharifee thought with himfeife,
that the Lord did not know the womanjwliich he had fo eafily recci-
ued into his prefence.lror he thought tl^.at Chrift would not haue rc-
ceiucd hefjif he had knowen her fuch a fianer as l"he was. And ther-
by he gatheredjchat Chrift was not a Prophet thatmight in fuch fort
be dectiued. The Loidjto ftiewe that (he was no finner to whom her
finnes were already forgiuen , did put out this parable. There were
two dettcrs to one creditour vpo vfuric.-the one ought fifty,the other
ought Hue hundredj both had their dettes forgiuen them. Whether
ovveth more thankerthe Pharifee anfwered: he to whom moft is for-
giuen.The Lord replied; learne hereby that this womans finnes arc
forgiue her,bccaufe ihehath loued much.Tn which word$(asyou fc)
he maketh not her loue the caufe,but the proofe of the forgiuenefte
of her finnes. For they are deriued vpon a fimilitude of that dcttour,
to whome Hue hundred was forgiuen; to whome he did not fay that
therefore it was forgiuen , becaufe he had loued much : but there-
fore loued much, becaufe it was forgiuen. And hereunto muft th.it fi-
mihtude be applied in this forte : Thou thinkeft this woman to be a
finner ; but thou oughteft to know that {he is none fuch , forafmuch
as her finnes be forgiuen her. And that her finnes be forgiue her,her
loue ought to proue vnto thee , whereby ilie rendereth thankc for
this bcnefit.It is an argument gathered of the following efFed, whcr-
by any thing is proucd by fignes enfuinge.By whatmeanc flie obtay-
ncd forgiuenes of finnes,the Lord openly tcftifieth: Thy faith, faith
J)e, haih faued thee . Therefore we obtayne forgiucnefle by fay thj
Cap.4. Of the maner how to receiuc
By charity we glue thankes , and teftiiie the bountifulnefTc of the
Lord.
g8 As for thofe things that are commonly founde in the bookes
of olde wryters conccrninge fatisfadion , they litle moue mel fee in
deede that many of them,(I will fpeake plainly) in a maner all whofe
books remaine,haue either erred in this poinr,or fpoke to aabbedly
and hardlycbut I will not graunt that they were fo rude and vnskilfull
as to haue wry tten thofe thinges in that fenfe that the new Satisfa-
^*'nf 1* ^'°^*'*'^ ^o read'; the.Chryfoftome in one place writeth thusrwhere
lo ' ^^^^. '^ required,examination ceiTethrwhere mercy is asked>iudge-
ment is not rigorous : where mercy is craued , there is no place tor
paine:where is mercy, there is no inquifition .Where is mercy , the
anfwere is pardoned. Which wordes howfoeuer they be wrcfted,yct
they can neuer be made to agree with the Schoolemens dodrinesJn
the booke of Ecdcfiafticall dodrines,which is fathered vpon Augu-
ftine, is red thus : Satisfadion of repentance is,to cut of the caufes of
iinnes,and not to graunt an entric to their fuggeftions. Whereby ap"
peareth that the dodrinc of fatisfadion that was fayd to be giuen in
recompenfe for (innes committed , was euen in thofe times laughed
to fcornc:forafmuch as they referre all fatisfadion to a heedefulneflc
in abftaining fro finnes in time to come. I will not alleagc that which
HofO'io ^^ (^n\c Chryfoftome fayth , that he requireth of vs no more , but
in Gen. that we (lioulde confelTe our finnes vnto him with teares : fith fuch
Enchir. fcntences are many times found in his wrytings & others. Auguft.nc
ad Lau- ^ (jcede in fome places calleth the workes of mercy, remedies to ob»
Mat (f ' **^''i^ forgiuenefle of finnes : but becaufc no man fhoulde ftumble at
la. that litle word,he himfelfe preuentcth it in an other place. The flefh
ofChrift(fayth he)the true and onely factifice for finnes, notonely
thefc finnes that are wholly put away in baptifmcjb'K alfo thcfe thac
afterward creepe in by weakenes : for which the whole church crieth
out at this day, Forgiuevs our trefpaflfcs. Andthey arcforgiuenby
that fingular facrifice.
J9 They haue for the moft parte called fatisfadiorjjHOt a recom-
penfe to be rendred to God, but an open declaration whereby they
that had bin excommunicate when they woulde be rcceiued againc
to the communion,did affertaine the church of their repentace. Foe
there were enioyned vnto them when they did repent certaine fa-
ftingcs and other thinges , whereby they might pcrfwade men that
they were truely and hartily weary of their former life , or rather
blotte out the remembrance of their former doinges : and fo they
were fayd to make fatisfadion not to God>but to the Church. Which
is
The grace of Chrifl. Lib.3, '271
Is alfo cxprefled of Auguftine in thefe wordes in his Enchiridion to Cap.tf j
Laurence : Out of that auncient cuftome the confeffions and fatis- &: i$ rc-
fa«fhons that are at this day vfed,tooke their beginning. Trudy very P*^^<*
viperous birthes,by which is brought to pafle, that there rcmainetn d^ctc
not fo much as a fhadowe of that better forme.I know that the oldc ces cap.
wryters do fometime fpeakc fomewhat hardly , and as I fayd euen '" aftio
now, I do not deny that paraduenture they erred herein. But thofc "'°"s-
thinges that were befprinkled with a few fpots, when they are once ^jt^J
handelcd with thefe mens vnwaflied handes,are altogether delilcd. ftic.i.
Andifwc muft contende with the authority of olde wryters : good
Godjwhat o!de wryters do they ihruft vnto vs?A good parte of thofc
%vhcrcwiih Peter Lombard their champion hath botched vp his pat-
ched Sentences, is gathered out of the vnfauory dotages of certainc
monkcs that arecaried about vnder the name of AmbrofejHieromc,
Auguftine, andChryfoltome . As about this prefenie queftion he
takcth in a maner all out of Auguftines boke of repentance, which is
foolifhely botched of good and bad by fomefcrapcr together. It
beareth in deede the name of Auguftine,but fuch a booke as no man
beinge but meanely learned, would voutchfaue to acknowledge for
his. But whereas I do not fo narowly examine their follies, lette the
readers pardon me whom 1 would eafc of that tedioufneffe.For to mc
it (hould not be very labourfome,and yet very paufible to bewray to
their great (hame thofe thinges that they haue heretofore boafted
vpon as mifterieSjbut becaufc my purpofe is to teach frutefully,ther-
fore I palTe them ouer.
The V. Chapter.
O/thefkpfljings which theyadde to JatuJnSions,s« pdrdora
andpurgatory.
OVt of this do<5hinc of fatisfadions do flowe indulgences or
pardons.For they fay that that which our power wanteth to
make fatisfadion , is fupplied by thefe pardons . And they
runne fo farre foorth into madneffe , that they define them
to be the diftribuiion of the mcrites of Chrift & of the martyrs, which
the Pope dealeth abroade by his bullcs . But although they haue
more neede of Helleborus to putge their frentike brainc, than argu-
mentcs to anfwere ihcm,fo that it is not much worthy the trauaile to
ftand vpon confutingc fuch triflinge errours,which arc already (hakcn
with many batfelrammes , and of thcmfelues grow into decaied age,
and bcnde toward fallingcyet becaule a fhorte confutation of them
ihalbe proEcable for Tome that be ignoraunt ^ I will not altogether o*
Cap.5« Of the maner how to receiitc
mit it. As for this that pardons haue Co longc ftande fafe,3n'dhati'e (6
longe bin vnpunifhed, hauinge bin vfed with Co outragious and fu-
rious licentioufnefTe : chis may ferae to icach vs in how darke a night
of errours ,men in certame ages paft haue bin drowned . They fa we
themfclues to be openly and vncolouredly fcornedofthe Pope & hit
Bulbearers , gainefuU markets to be made of the faiuation of eheit
fouIeSjthe price of faluation to be valued at a few pence, and noihmg
fetout to be frely giuenrthat by this colour they be wiped of cftrmgs
to be filtiiily fpeni vpon brothels,bavvdes and bankettmges : that the
greateft blowers abroade of pardons are the grearcft defpifers of the:
that this monfter doth daily more & more with greater licentiouf-
ncffe oucrrunne the worldf , and grow into outrage, and that there is
no ende,newe lead dayly brought,and newe inor>y gotten. Yet with
hyc reuerence they reccjued , they wordiipped and bought pardon*;,
and fuch as among the reft faw fomewhat farther, yet thought them
to be godly deceites,wherby men might be beguiled with fome pro-
fit. At the lengrhjfince the world fuftcred it felfe to be fomewha? wi-
fer,pardons waxe colde)and bj litle and litle become frofen,. till they
vtterly vanifhaway.
2 Butforafmuch as many that fee the fihhygaminges, tlie dc-
ceitesj theftes^nd robberies, where with the pardoners haue hereto-
fore mocked and begiled vs , yet fee not the very fountayne of vn-
godlincffe fiom whence they ipringe : it is good to flicw not oncly of
what Con pardons be,but alfo what they be, when they are waped fro
all fpottes. They call the treafure of the church, the merites of Ghrift
and of the holy Apoftles and Martyrs. The principall cuftody of this
barne (as I haue already touched) they faine to be deliucred to the
bifhop of-Rome,that he fliould haue the diftributio of fo great gifts,
that he might both giue them byhimfclfc, and alfo grauntiurifdi-
^ion to other to giue them.Hcreupon precede from the Pope fom-
time plenary pardons, fomtime pardons for ceriaine ycres:from the
Cardinals , pardons for a hundred dayes : from Bilhoppes, pardons
for forty daycs.But they be (as I may naturally defcribc the)the pro-
faninge of the bloud of Chritt , Sathans mockery,to leadc away the
chriftian people from the grace of God,from the hfe that is in Chrift,
and to turne them from the true way of faluation. For how could the
bloude of Chrift be more filthily prophaned , than when it is denied
to fuffice the rem'ffion of finncs , to reconciliation and fatisfa«5lion,
vnleiTe the want thereof as being withered and wafted", flioulde be o-
Ad.jo. therwiftj fupplied and profited? The law and all the Prophercs (faith
4J» Peter) bearc witncfle of Chrift , that by him forgsueneftc of finnc is
to
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3 ] 272
to be receiued:Pardons giuc remifllon of (inncs by Peter, Paul and
the Marty rs.The bloud of Chrift(raith Iohn)cleanfeth vs fro finnc: i.ioh.i
Pardons do make the bloud of Martyrs the waHiing away of finnes. 7.
Chrift(faithPaul)\vhich knew not finne,was madelinne forvs,y is, ^-Cor.^
the fatisfadion of(innc,that we might be made the righteoufnefle **'
of Godm him : Pardons do fette the fatisfadionof linnesin the
bloude of Martyrs. Paule cried out and teftified to the Corinthians, i.Cor. i
that only Chrift was crucified and died for them : the pardons pro- ' 3»
nounce that Paule and other died for vs. In an other place he fayth
that Chrift purchafed the church wich his bloudrthe pardos appomt , g '*^
an ether price of purchace in y bloud of Martyrs. The Apoftlc faith, Hckio.
that Chrift with one oblation made perfed for cuer them that were 14.
fandified : the pardons crie out to the contrary and fay, that fandifi-
cation is made perfed by the Martyrs, which otherwife were not fuf-
ficient. lohn fayth that all the faintes wafhed their gowns in the Reac.7.
bloud of the lambe: the pardons teach men to wafli their gownes in 14.
bJoud of faintes.
3 Leo Bifhop of Rome,writcth notably wcl to y Paleftincs againft Epf, Jt .
thefe fiicrileges. Although (faith he)the death ofmany faintes hath Pfa. 11^
bin precious in the fight of the Lord, yet the killing of no innocent * )•
hath bin the propitiation of the world. The righteous receiued, but
gaue not crownes: and out of the valiantnefle of the faithful are gra-
uen examples of pacicncc,not gifts of righteoufncs.For their deathes
were euery one fingular to thcmfelucs,& none of the did by his end
pay the det of an other,forafmuch there is one Lord Chriftjn whom
all are crucified,all are dead,buried,and raifed vp againe. Which fen-
tence(as it was worthy to be remebred)he repeated in an other place
There can nothingc be required more plaine to deftroy this wicked
dodrine. Yet Auguftine fpeaketh no leffe fitly to y fame efFed.Thogh Epj. pc.
(faith he)we die brethren for brethren,yet the bloud of no Martyrs Trad-ia
is filed for V forgiuenes of finnes. Which thing Chrift hath done for ^®^'^4.
V8,neithcr hath he therin done that for v^ithat we Ihould folow him,
but hath giue vs a thing to reioice vpon. Againe in an other place. As .,
only the fonne of God was made the fonnc of ma.to make vs w him ^j b^
the formes of God: fo he alone for vs hath take vpon him punijhmet nif.ca-4
without euil deferuingcs,that we by him might without good defer-
uinges obtaine grace not due vnto vs.Truely where as all their do-
drine is parched together of horrible facrileges and blafphcmies,yee
this is a more monftruous blafpiumy thah all the othcr.Lct them re-
member thefelucSjwhether thefe be not their decrees: that the Mar-
tyrs haue by their death done more to God.and defjrwed morc,thaii
Cap.5^ Of the maner how to receive
was nedefull for themfeluesrand thit they had remaining (b great a
plenty of deferuings, as did alfo out rflow vnto othertand that thcr«
fore^eaft Co great yoodnefTe fhoulde be fuperftuous , their bloud is
mingled with the bloud of Chrirt,and of both theie bloudes is made
the treafure of the church,for the remiflio and latisfadion of finnes.
And that fo is the fayinge of Paule to be tjkenil fupply in my body
thofe things that want of the fuflPrings of Chrilt for his body, which
is the church. What is this elfe but to leaue Chrift only his name, o-
thenvife to make him but a common pety fiint , that may fcarcely a-
tnong the multitude be knowen from the reft?He only,only fliouidc
haue bin preached,he onely fet foorth, he only named, he only bia
looked vn(o,when tb.e obtaining of forgiuencflc offinne,farisfadi6,
and fandiHc3tion are entreated of But let vs heare their curtailed ar-
gumcntes. Lcaft the bloude of the Martyrs fhoulde be fhed in vame,
therefore let it be employed lothe common benefit of the Church.
Is it fo?was it no profit to glorifie God by their death? to fubfcribc to
his trueih with their bloud ? by defpifinge this prcfent hfe,to teftific
that they fought for a better lifes'by their ftedfaftnefle to ftrcngthcn
the faith ofthe church , and ouei come the ftubbornefTe of the ene-
mies f But this is the matter in decde: they acknowledge no profit of
the Martyrs death,if Chnlt only be the propitiator, if he onely died
forourfinnesjifhe onely was offered vp for our redemption. So (fay
they) Peter and Paul might neuertheleflfe haue obtayned the crown
of vidory , if they had died in their beddes. And whereas they haue
fought euen to the fhedinge of their bloude,it woulde not agree with
y iiiftice of God to leaue the fame barren & frutelcs.As though God
could not tel how to encreafe in his feruants their glory ,according to
the meafurc of his giftsBut the church receiueth in commune toge-
ther ptofite enough , when it is by their triumphcs encouraged to a
2calo.us defire to fight.
4 But how maliciouily do they wreft that place ofPaule where he
:oIo. I . faith, that he fupplieth in his body thofe thinges that wanted of the
4» fufferings of Chrift?For he refcrreih not the default or fupplying, ta
the worke ofrcdemption,fatisfadion, & expiationrbut to thofe affli-
ftions vvherwith all the members of Chrifl,that is to fay.all the faith-
full muft be exercifed , fo Icnge as they fhall be in this flerti. He fayth
therfore,that this remaineth ofthe fuflerings of Chrift, that he dayly
fuffereth in his members the fame that he once fufFered in himfelfe.
Chrif^ vouch faueth todovs fo great honor , toreckenandaccompc
our afBidions his owne. Where as Paule added thefe wordes, for the
church J he mcaneth not for the redemption/or the reconciliation,
for
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 273
for the fatisfaction of ihc church , but for the cdifyinge and profit of
the church. As in an other place he faych,that ]^c fuffcreth all things j.Tim. 2
for the cledcs fakeSjthat they may obtaine the faluaiion which is in 10.
Chrift Itfu. And he wrote to the Coiinthiansjthat he Tuffered ;tll the ^Cor.i
troubles that he fufh ed, for their comfort and faluaiion. And imrae- *
diatly in the fame place he exooundcth himfelfe, v/hcn he fayth fur-
ther, that he was made a minilier of the church,not for redemption,
butaccordingerothe difpcnfation that was committed vntoliim, to
preach the Goi'pel of Chrift. If they yet require an other expofitour,
let them heare Auguftine.The (utferingesof Chnft(fayth he)are in In PDl.
Chrift only as in the hcad;and both in Chrift & the church,as in the ' ^*
whole body. Whereby Paule being one member faith,! fupply in my
body that which wantcth in the fuffnngs of Chrift. 7 hcrforc if thou
what focuer thou be y heareft this,art one of the members of Chrift,
whatfoeucr thou fuffereft of the that are not the members of Chrjft,
that fame wanted in the fufFiings of Chrift. Butwherunto rhe fuf-
frings of the Apoftles taken for the church of Chrift do tend, he ex-
poundcth in an other place where he fayth ; Chrift is to me the gate Trnfi-.in
vnto you : becaufe ye are the fhcpe of Chrift bought with his bio id: 10)1.47.
acknowledging your priccjwhich is not giue of me, but preached by
mc.Thcn he addeth. As he hath giucn his foule, Co ought we to giue
our foules for our brethren,to edifie peace, & to c5firme faitb.Thcfc
are Auguftines wordsBut God forbid, th^t Paul Ihould haue thought
that any thing wanted in the fuffnngs of Chrift,as concerning all ful»
ncs of righteoufnes > faluation and lifc:or that he meant to adde any
thing thereuntOjwhich fo plainly and honorably preacheth,that the
abundance of grace was fo largely poured out by Chrift, that it fan e ^""^ »•
furmounted all the force of finne. By it only all thq fainrcs haue bin ^ ^
faued,& not by y merit of their owne hfe or death, as Peter cxprefly ^ r
tcftified.fo that he ftiould be fclanderous againft God & Chrift, that ^"^
Ihould rcpofe the worthines of any faint any where elfe than in the
only mercy of Gcxl.But why do I tary hereupon any longer,3S vpon a
matter yet doutfull,fith the very bewrayinge of fuch monftruous cr-
rours is a fufficient confutation of them.^
5 Now(to paffe ouer fuch abhominations)who taught the Pope
to enclofe in lead and parchement the grace of leftis Chrift , which
the Lord willed to be diftributed by the word of the GofpelfTrucly
cither the Gofpell of God muft be falfe, or their pardons falfe.For,
that Chrift is offrcd vs in the Gofpel, with all abundance of heauenly
benefites, with all his merites, with all his righteoufnes, wifdcm and
graccjwithout any exception,Paul witneflcth where he faith,tbat the ».Cor. 1
MM
Cap.j. Of the maner how to recciue
\Toid of reconciliation was deliuered to the mi nifteis, whereby they
might vfe this form^f me(rage,as it were Chrift giuing exhortation
by them:\YC bcfech you, be ye fo reconciled to God j* He hath made
him y knew no finnc,to be made finne for vs,thac we might be made
the righteoufnes of God in him. And the faithful know of what va-
lue is that common partakinge of Chrift, which(as the fame Apoftlc
v/irnefleth)is offred vs to be enia)'ed in the Gofpel. Contrariwife the
pardos do brmg out of the ftorehoufe of the Pope,a certaine pitancc
of grace,& faften it toleadjparchcmenr,yea and to a certaine place,
& feuere it from the word of God. If a man fhould aske whence this
abufe tooke beginning:it feemcth to haue proceded herof,that when
in time paft penitcntcs were charged with more rigorous fatisfa<flio$
than all could beare , they which felt thcmfelues aboue meahire op-
prefled with penace cnioyned them,required of the church a rcleaic.
The mitigation that was graunted to fuch,w3S called an indulgence
or pardon . But when they turned Satisfadions from the Church to
God..& fayd that they were recompenfcs wherby men may redcemc
ihemfclues fio the iudgement of God.then they therwithall did alfo
draw thefe indulgences or pardons to be propitiatory remedies , to
deliucr vs from deferued punifliments. As for thefe blafphemcrs that
we haue recited,they forged the fo fhamcleflely,that they canhauc
no colour at all.
6 Now let the no more trouble vs with their purgationjbecaufc it
is with this axe already broken,hewed downe, & oucrthrowen from
the very fundations.For I do not agree to fome me, that thinke beft
to diflfcmble in this point,3nd make no mention at all of Purgatory,
whereupon(as they ray)great contentions do arife,but fmall edifica-
tion is gotten Tfuely 1 my fclfe woulde alfo thinke fuch trifles wor-
thy to be negligently pafled ouerjif they did not accompt the earncft
matters.But forafmuch as purgatory is builded of many blafphemes,
and is dayly vpholden with newe blafphemes , and raifcth vp many
and gricuous offences, truely it is not to be winked at . This parad-
uenture might after a fort haue bin diiremblcdforatime,thatitwas
inucnted by curious and bolde raflinelTe without the wordc of God:
that men beleued of it by, I wot nor what reuclations, fained by the
craft of Sathan : that for the confirmation ofit , certaine places of
Scripture were fondly wrefted. Albeit the Lord giueth not leaue to
mans prefumptuoufnes fo to hreake into y fecrei places of his iudgc-
Deu i8 "^^n^s,& hath feuerely forbidden men to enquire for trueth at dead
21. *mc,neglcdini^his word,& permittethnothiswordtobe fo vnrcue-
redy dcfiled.But let vs graunt,ihac all thofe things might for a while
haue
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 274
hauc bin borne wiih)as thmges of no great importaiince. But when
thecleanfingeof finnes is fought elfe where then in thcbloude of
Chrift,when fatisfadion is giuen away to any other ihinge,thcn it is
molt perillous not tofpeake of it. T herefore we muftcrie out noc
onely with vehement Iketching of our voice, but al'o of our throtc
and fides ; that Purgntory is the damnable dcuife of Sathan , that
itmaketh voide theCroffeof Chnft, that u lay eth an intolerable
fdander vpon the mercy of God , that it feebltth and oucrthroweth
our faith . For what elfe is Purgatory amongc them, but the f3C}sfa-
dioQthat the foules of men departed do pay after their death ? So
that ouerthrowing the opinion of fatisfadion, Purgatory is immcdi-
atly oucrthrowen by the very rootes. But if m our former dilcourfc it
is more than cuident that the bloude of Chnll is the oncly fatisfa-
dioh, propitiatory facriticc and cleanfing for the finnes of the faith-
full : what remameth but that purgatory is a mere and horrible blaf-
phemic againft Chrift ? I^palTc ouer the robberies ot God wherewith
it IS daily defended, the offenfcs that it bredeth in religion, and other
thinges innumerable , which we fee to haue come out of the lame
fpring of vngodlinefie.
7 But it is good to wringe out of their handes fiich placts as they
haue falfly & wrongfully take out of the Scripture. When(fay they)
the Lord affirmeih thaty finne againft the holy Ghoft fiiould not be ^at«<2
forgiuenin this world.nor in the world to comc,th€reby he flicweth ^'
that there is a forgiuenefle of fome linnes in the worlde to come.But jg.
who feeth not that the Lord there fpeaketh of thefaultoffinne?Now Luc, 17.
if it be fo,what is that to their Purgatory, forafmuch as by their opi- >o.
nion the paine is there fuftred of thofe finneS:,wherofthey deny noc
the fault to be forgiue in this preftnt hfcBut that they may no more
carp againft vs,they fhal haue yet a plainer folution. When the Lord
meant to cut of all hope of Pardon from fo haynous wickedncffc, he
thought it not enough to fay that it fhould neuer be forgiue: but the
more to amplify it,he vfed a diuil"on,wherin he comprehended both
the iudgement that eu<:iy mans confcicflce feeleih in this life,& the
laft iudgement that flialbe openly pronounced at the refurrcdionras
thogh he (hould haue faid.Bcware ye of malicious rebellio,as of moft
prefent damnatio.For he that of fet purpofe flial endcuour to quench
the light of the holy Ghoft, ftiall not obtaine pardon,neithcr in this
life which is giuen to finners for their conuerfion,nor in the laft day
when the lambcs Ihalbe fcuered by the angels of God fro the goats,
and the kingdomeofheaucnfhalbecleanfcd from all offenfcs.Thcn j^iac. s
they bringe foorth that parable out of Matthew : Agree with thine 15.
MM ij
Cap. 5. Of the maner how to receiiie
aduerfaryjeaft he d^liuer thee to the ludge, & the iudge to the Sar-
' geant , arfcd the Sargeant to the prifon , from whence thou flialt not
get oufjvntilthou haft payed the vttermoft farthing. If in this place
the Iudge do fignifie God,and the aduerfary plentife the Deuiljthc,
Sargeant the Angell , aodthe prifon purgatory , I wil gladly yecldc
vnto them.But if it be euidenr to all men, that Chrift meant there to
fhow into how many daungers and mifchieues they caft rhcmfelues,
that had rather obltinatly purfue the extremity of the law, tha deale
accordang to equity & good right, to the ende to exhort his difciplcs
the more earnetily to agreement with equity : where the I pray you
(liali Purgatory be found?
8 They fetch an argument out of y faying of Paul,where he affir-
hil. 2. nieth that the knees of thinges in heauenjcarth & hels, fhail bow to
3. Chrift.For they take it as cofefled, that hels can not there be meant
of thofe that are adiudged to eternall damnation. Therfore it r'emai-
neth that it muft be the foules lying in pame in Purgatory. They did
not rcafon very euil, if the Apoftle did by kncelinge meane the true
godly worfhipping.But fith he teacheth only,that there is a dominio
giuen to Chnft whereby all creatures are to be fubduedjwhat proofe
' is there to the contrary>but that we may by hels vnderftand the De-
uilsjthat {halbe brought before y iudgement of God,to acknowledge
om.ij him their ludge with feare and trembling?' Like as Paulhimfelfe ex-
<>' poundeth the fame prophecy in an other place. All (fay th he)fhalbc
^ brought before the iudgemet fexte of Chriit.For it is vvriiten:So truly
as I hue,euery knee fhall bow to me. &c.But we may not fo expound
^ that which is in the Reuelation:! haue heard all creatures.both thefe
, '''' things that are in heauen, & thofe that arc vpon the earth, and thefe
that are vndcr the earth,& thofe that are in the feae,& all thofe that
are in the,! haue heard the all fay to him that fittcth on the Throne
& totheLambejBlefling & honor, andglory,and power/or eucr 8c
cuer . That I do in deede eafily graunt , but what creatures do they
thinke to he here rehearfed ? For it is moft ccrtaine , that there are
contained creatures both without reafon and without fenfe.Whcrby
is affirmed nothing elfe,but that all the partes of the world,from tl^
hicft toppe of the beauens,to the very midle point of the earth,doin
their maner declare the glory of their creator. As for that which they
Mach alleage out of the hiftory of the Machabecs, I will not vouchfaue to
*-43' anfwere it, leaft I Hiould feeme to recken that worke in the number
of the holy books.But Augultine receiucd it for Canonicall.But firft,
of what fure credit did he recciue it ? The lewes f fayih hej cftccmc
not the wry ting of the Machabees as they do the law,the Prophetes
and
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3 . 275
and the Pfalmes,of which the Lord himfelfe hath wicnefTcd as of his
witnefTes, faying: It was neccflary, that all chingesfhould be fulrtlled
that are wryttenin the law, and the PfalmeSjand Prophetes,concer-
ning me. But it hath bin receiued of the Church not vnpiofitably , if Concra
it be foberly read or heard. And Hierom teacheth without any dou- gaude r.
ting that the authority thereof is of no force to prouing of dodrines. ^P''^ ^'
And it euidently appeareth by that old booke,vvhich is entituled vn- Luk.z3.'
der the name of Cyprian, concerninge the cxpofition of the Ciede,
that it had no place at all in the olde Church'.But why do I here Itriuc
without caufe .> As though the author himfelfe doth not fufficiently j.Mach
{hewjhow much he is to be credited,\vhe in the end he craueth par- i^i^,
don,if he haue fpoken any thing not well.Truely he that confcfleth
his wrytings to nede pardon, fayth plainly that they are not the ora-
cles of the holy Ghoft. Befide that, y godlines of ludas is praifed for
none other caufe,but for that he had an afliired hope of the iailrefur-
redion,when he fent an offring for the dead to Hierufalem. Neither
doth the wryter of that hiftory referre that which ludas did to be a
price of redemption, but that they might be partakers of the eternall
life with the other faithful,ihat had died for their contry & religion.
This doing was in Aqc^q. not without fuperftition and prepofterous
ieale.but they are more tha fooles,that draw a facrifice of the law fo
farre as vnto vs ; forafmuch as we know that things do cefTe by the
comming of Chrift,that then were in vfc.
9 But they haue an inuincible bulwarke in Paul,which can not fb
eafily be battered. If any man (fqythhe) build vpon this foundation, ^ q^^ .
gold,lilucr,precious ftones,rimber,heye,ftubbIe, the Lord fhall (hew
euery mans worke what it is:becauCc it fhal be reuealed m fier,& the
fier Hiall trie euery mans worke what it is.lf any mas worke do burne,
it fliall fuffer loflfe, but he (halbc fafe, but as through the fier . What
fier (fay they)can that be,but the fier of Purgatory?by which the fil-
thineltes of finnc are clenfed away,that we may enter pure in to the
kingdom of God ? But the moft part of the old wryiers thought it to ^^r!^'
be an other fier, that is to fay , Trouble or the crofle , by which the ° ({ ^
Lord trieth them that be his, that they fhould not reft in the filthincs others,
of the fleni;& that is much more probable,than in faining purgatory.
Albeicldoneitker agree with thcfe men , becaufel thinkelhauc
attained a certaine and much plainer voderftanding of that place.Buc
before that I vtter it, I woulde haue the anfwere me, whether the A-
poftles & all y fainftes muft haue gone throu.^h this fier of Purgato -
ry?I knovvthey wilfay,nay.Forit were tomuch inconuenietthat they
muft haueneded to be purgcd,whofc merites they drcame to oucr-
MM iij
Cap. 5. Of the maner how to rcceiue
flow abouc meafure to all the members of the church.But the Apo-
IHe affiimeth it. For he doth not fay that the worke of fome llialbc
proueci,but the workc of all. Neither is this my argumet,but Augu-
ichir. ftineSjwhichfoconfuteth thatexpofitio. Ancl(whichismoreabfur-.
Lau cl!ty)he doth not fay^y ihcy flial paflc through the fire for all worksj
"• ^^ but if they haue faithfully builded the church, they (hallreceiue re-
warde when then- worke is examined with fier. Firft we fee that the
Apoftle vfed a Mctaphofc, when he called the dodrincs inueted by
mans braines,wood,hey,& (lubble. And the Metaphorc hath an ap-
parant refcue;that as wood fo foonc as it is put in the fier,confumeth
& wafteth, fo can not thoie dodrines contmue when they come to
be examined . Now no man is ignorant that fuch rriall commeth of
the holy Ghoft.Thercrore to folow the true caufe of his metaphorc,
& match the partes rogcthcr with iuft ielarion,he called the triall of
the holy Ghoft,fier.For eucn as the nercr that gold & filuer are pm
to the fier/o much the furer proufe they haue of their goodncs and
finenes:fo the L\?rds trueth, y more exalily it is weyed with fpiritual
examination, fo much the greater cofirmation of credit it receiueth.
As hey,wood,& ftubble put ro the fi:r,are brought to fudden confu-
rning , fo the inuentions ofmennotftablillied by the word of God,
can not beare the criaUof the holy. Ghoft,biit they byandby fal away
and perifli.Finallyjif forced doctrines be compared to wood,hey,3nd
ftubble,becaufe like wood,hey, &ftubble, they arc burned with fire
& deftroicd:hut they are not deittoied or driuen away but by the fpi-
ritofthc Lord : it foUoweih that the holy Glioft is the fier wherwith
they (halbe proued,whofe prouf Paul,according to the common vfc
of the Scripture,calleth The day of the Lord. For it is called y day of
the Lordjwhcnfoeuer he doth any way (hew his prefcnce to me.But
the his face principally fliineth,when his trueth fiiineth vpo vs.Now
haue we proued,that Paul meaneth no other fier,but the triall of the
holy Ghoft.Bitt how are they (aucd by y fier , that fufFer lofle of their
worke?That fliall not be hard ro vndeift3nde,if we confider of what
kinde of men he fpeaketh . For he toucheth thofe builders of the
church, that kcping the true fondation, do build difagreeing matter
vpon itjthat is to fay , they that not fwaruing fro the chicfe & necef-
fary articles of faith, do crre in pointes that be fmaler & lefle perilous
min^Iinr^ their ownedcuifes with the word of God.Such I fay,muft
fuffer loffe of their worke,haninge their deuifes deftroicd.But them-
felues arc fiucd , but as by the fier : that is to fay,not that their igno-
rance and erro'ir is allowable before the Lord , but bccaufc they are
clcanfed from it by the grace and power of the holy Ghoft.Therfore
who*
The gnce of Chrilt, Lib.3. ^7^
whofoeuer baue defiled the golden Hnenefle of Gods word with this
dong of purgatory, they muft ncdes fuffcrlofle of their workc.
10 But they wil fay , it hath bui an auncicnt vfage of the church.
Paulc anfwered this obiedion when he comprchendetb his ov/nc
time in that fentence,where he fayth,that all they muftfuftcr loflc of
their workc,that in the building of the church, do lay any thing vpo
the fundation that agrccth not with K,Therefore when tiie aduerla-
ries obicd againft me , that it hatli bin vfed aboue a thoufande and
three hundreth yearcs,to haue prayers made for the dead;I aske the
againe, by what word of God,by what Reuciation,by what example
it was done.For here they do not only want tcftimonics of Scripture
but alfo all the examples of holy men that there are red,do{liewiio
fuch thing.Of the mourning and order of funeralles there are fomti-
mcs found many & long tales:but of prayers you can not fee one tit-
tle. But of the greater weight that the matter is, the more it ought to
hauc bin expreflely fpoken.But the very old fathers themfelues that
prayed for the dead,did fee that herein they wanted both commaun-
dement of God,and lawfull example.Why then durft they fo do ? In
this I fayjthey did fufFer fomwhat as men : & therfore I affirme that,
that which they did,ought not to be drawe into example. For where
as the faithfull ought to enterprife the doinge of nothing> but vpon
affurcd confcience,as Paule teachethithisanbrednefleis principally
required in prayer. But it is likely that they were led by fome reafon
vnto it:they fought fome comfort to relieue their forrow: and it fee-
mcd vnnatural not to (hew before God fome teftimony of their loue
toward the dead. Howe mans wit is endined to this aftedionjall men
know by experience. Alfo the rcceiued cuftome was like a burninge
brand ro fet many mens mindes on tier. We knowe that witl; all na-
tions & in all ages there were funerals done for y dead, & their foules
yearely purged; For though Sathan beguiled foolifh men withthefe
deceitcs : yet he tooke occafion fo to begile by a true principle : that
death is not a deftrudio,but a pafTage our of this life into an other. And
it is no doutjbutthat cue very fuperftitio condeneth the Gentils be-
fore the iudgcment feat of God, for negleding the care of the life to
come, which they profefled themfelues to beleue.Nowe Chriftians,
becaufe they would not be woi fc than Heathe mcn,were afliamed to
do nothing for the d£ad,as though they were vtterly deftroicd.Heru-
pon came that il aduifed diligence ; becaufe if they were flow in loo-
king to y funcralsjin bankettinges & oftrings,they thought that they
had put themfelues in daunger of a great reproche. And that which
firft proceedcdfrom a v/rongful following of the Heathens example,
MM iiij
Cap.5. Orthemanerhowtoreceiuc
was To multiplied by often new encreares,that now it is the principal
holyncire of Papiftry,to help the dead in diftrefle.But the Scripture
mrniftieth an other much better and perftder comfort,whcn it telii-
fiethjthat the dead are bleffed that die m the Lorde. And it addeth a
reafoncbecaufe from thence forth they relt fro their labours. And we
ought not fo much tenderly to follow our owne affedion of louejto
fet vp awrogfulmaner of praymg in the church. Truely he that hath
but meane wifdom, doth foone perceiue that all that is red hereof in
the olde wrytcrs,was done t6 beare with the common vfjgCjand the
ignorance of the people. They themfelues alfo,! grauntjwere caried
away into errour euen as vnaduifcd lightnes of bcHcfe is wont to rob
mtns wits of iudgcment. But in the meane time the very readinge of
them doth rbeWjhow doutingly they commend prayers for the dead.
Auguftuie in his booke of confedions , reporteth that Monica his
mother did earneftly defire>that (Tie might be remembred in celebra-
ting the rwnifteries at the Altar. An old wiues requefi:,which y fonnc
ncuer examined by the rule of the Scripture, but according to his af-
fedio of n3ture,would hauc it allowed of other. As for the bookethat
he made of care for the dcadcjcontaineth To mapy doutinges,that of
right It ought with the coldnes thereof to quench the heate of a foo-
lifh zcalerif any man defire to be a prodor for dead men , truely with
cold likelihodes it wil bring them out of care that were before care-
ful. For this IS one piller of it,that this doing is not to be defpifed, be-
caufeitis a cuftomcgrowe in vre,that the dead (hould be pr.iycd for.
But though I grailt to the old writers of the churcii,ihat it is achari*-
table vfe to help the dcad:yet we muft ftil hold one rule which ca not
deceiuer that it is not lawfuil for vs in our prayers to vfe any tbing of
our own,bur our rcqueftes muft be made fubied to the word of God:
becaufe it is in his wil to appoint what he wil haue to be asked.Now
where as the whole lawe and the Gofpelldonot fo much ns in one
filiable giue liberty to pray for the dead,it is a prophane abufe of the
inuocation o'c God to atttcmpt more than he commaunderh vs. But
that our aduerfaries may not boaft that they haue the aunciet church
copanion oftheir errour : I fay there is great difference beiwene the
& ir.Thcy vCcd a memorial of y dead,leaft they fhould fecmc to haue
caft away all care of them : but they did therewithall confcfl'e that
they douted of their ftate.As for purgitory,they fo affirmed nothing
that they helde it for a thinge vncertaine.Thefe men require to hauc
that which they haue dreamed of purgatory, to be holde wout queftio
for an article of faith.They fclendetly & only to paffe it Ightly oucr,
did in the comunion of the holy fupper comend ihcjr d^ad to God:
Thffe
i
The grace ot Chrift. Lib.3 , 277
Thefe do continually call vpon the care of the dcadjand with impor*
tunate praifingitjdo make it to be preferred aboue all dutieful works
of chantie.Yca and it were not harde for vs to bringe forth fome tef^
timonies ofiheolde writers, that do manifeftly ouerthrowe all
thofe prayers for the dead,which then weare vfcd. As this of Augu- Hom.in
(Vine, when he tcacheth that all men lokc for the refurredion of the loan,
flcfhand the eternall gloricjand that euery man then receiueth the 45^»
reft that followcth after death , it he be v/orthy when he dieth. And
therefore he teftifieth, that all the Godly do immediatly after death
enioy the blefTed reft as well as the Prophets, Apoftles and martyrs.
If their eftate be fuch , whati befeche you , iTiall our prayers auailc
them ? I paffc oucr the grofler fuperftitions, wherewith they hauc
bewitched the mindes of the iimple: which yet are fo innumerable
and the moft part fo m6ftruous,that they can haue no honeft collour
to cxcule them. Alio 1 let paiTe thofe moft filthy byings and fellings
that they haue vfed , while theworldewas in fuchgrolTc fenflclTe
ignorance. For both I fhoulde neuer make an ende,and alfo the rea-
ders iliall without any rehearfallof them,hauehere fufficient, wher-
vpon they may ftabliih their confciences.
The vj. Chapter.
of the life of a Chriliianman : ^ndjirfl by what argiimentes the
Script-Are exhort eth vs thereunto, ^
WE haue already faidjthatthe marke whercunt© regene-
ration tendeth , is that in the life of the faithful! there
lliould appeare an agrement and confent betwenc the
righteoufnelTe of God and their obedience:anddjatfo
■they ftiould confirme the adoption,whereby they are rcceiued to be
children. Bur although his lawe conteine in itfelfe thatnewnefle,
whereby the image of God is rcftored in vs,yet bccaufe our dulneftc
hath ncede both of many prickingea forwarde and helpes, therefore
itfhalbe profitable to gather out of diuerfe places of the Scripture
an order of framing of life , that they that haue a dcfirous minde of
amcndcment,may not wander out of the way in their endeuour.
Now when I take vpon me the framing of a Chriftian mans hfe,I am
not ignorant that 1 entre into a manifold and plentuous argument,
and fuch as may with the greatnefle thereof fill a long volume, if I
wold abfolutcly entreate of it in all poinies.For we fe into what great
length are ttretchcd the exhortatorie orations of olde writcrs,made
onely euery one of one feuerallvertue. And that is not doncv/ith
too much idle babbling. Pot what fo cucr vcrtue ajpa purpofe to fet
Cap.&. Of the mailer how to rcceiiic
out in oration , the (hlc runneth of it felfe into fuch largenes with
plcntie of matter , that a man can not feme to haue difcouifed well
of itjvnlefle he haue fpoken much.But my mind is not to ftretche Co
far the inftitution of hfe , which I promife to tcachc, as peculiarly to
go through eucry fpeciall vertue , and wander abrode into exhorta-
tions. Let fuch thinges be fetched out of ojher mens writinges, and
fpecially out of the Homelies of the olde fathers. It ftialbe enough
for me to (hewc an orderly trade.wherby a godly man may be guided
to a right markc of framing his life , and rtiortly to apoint out a cer-
tain vniuerfall rule, by which he may well trie what be his duties.
There fhall paraduenture at fome other feafon be a fit time to make
declamations , or I will leaue that to other , which I my felfe am not
mete to do. I do naturally loue fhortnelTe , and paraduenture if I
would fpcake more at largCjit woulde not frame well with me. And if
a loger manner of teaching were neuer fo much pleafing,yet I would
fcarce haue minde to put itinprofe. Butthccourfeofthisprefent
worke requireth to knit vp a fimple dodrine with as great fhort-
neflfeaslmay. As the Phylofophers haue their certaine cndes of
right and honeftic , from which they dcriue particular duties and ail
thecompanie ofvertues : fo the Scripture is not without her order
in this matter: but holdctha moft goodly well ordred difpofition,
and much more certaine than all the Phylofophers orders.This only
is the difference , that they (as they were vaineglorioUs men) haue
diligently endeuoured to atteine an cxquifite plainnefl'e of order, to
{hewe fourth the ready aptnelfe of their witte.But the Spirit of God,
becaufe he taught without curious affe^ation, hath not foexadely
nor continually kept an orderly trade:which yet when he fometimc
vfcibjhe doth lufficienrly declare, that it is not to be ncglefted of vs.
1 This inftrudion that the Scripture teacheth,whereof we now
fpeake,ftadeth chiefely vpon two partes.The firft,that there be pou-
red and brought into our mindes a loue of righteoufnelTejto which
otherwifcwe are of nature nothing indined.The feconde,that there
be a rule fet out vnto vs, that may not fuffer vs to go out of the way
in following righteoufnes. In commendation of righteoufnes it hath
both very many and very good rcafons: of which we haue herebe-
fore in diuerfe places fpoken of fome, and other fome we lliall in this
place briefely touch. At what foundation may it better bcginne,than
when it putteth vs in minde that we miift be holy , becaufe our God
is holy? For when we were fcattered abrode like ftraying (hgpc , and
difperfed abrode in the maze of the world , he ^rathercd vs together
againcjto ioine ^ in one flocke with him felfc.When we heare men-
tion
i
The grace of Chrift. Lib.;. 27S
t^on tnade of our loining with God! , let vs remember that holineifc
muftbc thebondc thereof. Notthatby themeute of holinefTewc
come into common with him: (where as rather we muft fiift cleauc
vnto him, that bcying endued with his hohnefle, we may followe
whether he calleth ) but becaafe it greatly perteineth to his glorie,
that he hauc no fcUowfliip with wickednefl'e and vncleannede.Ther-
forealfo it teacheth , that this is the encleof ourcaUing,which we
ought alway to haue refpe^t vnto,if we will anfvvere God that calleth
vs. For to what purpofe was it , thar we (hould be drawen out of the
wickednefle and filthcnefle of the world, if we geue our feluesleaue
all our hfe long to wallowe in them ftd!? Moreouer it alio admoni-
ihcth vSythac to the cnde we may be reckened among the people of
God, we muft dwell in the holy citieHierufalem. Which as he hath P^^- J^
halowcd to him felfe, fo is it vnlawefull that it be vnholily profaned p'jv, , -
by the vncleannefle of the inhabitantes . From hence came thcfe j.gc i^
fayingcs , that they fhall haue a place in the tabernacle of God that
walke without fpot^and ftudie to followe righteoufneire.&c. Becaufc
it is not mcete that the Sanduarie whereon he dwellcthj ihoulde be
likea fhble full of filihinefie. "*
J And the better to awake vs,it{heweth that God the father, as
he hath ioincd vs to him felfe in his Chnft, fo hath primed an image
for vs in him,after which he would haue vs to be fafhioned. Now let
them findc tr»e a better order among the Phylofophers , that thinke
that the phylofophie concerning manners , is in them onely orderly
framed. They when they will excellently well exhorte vs to vertue,
bring nothing els but that we fhould hue agreably to nature. But the
Scripture bringcth here exhortation from the true wclfpringe, when
it not onely teacheth vs to rcferre our life to God , the authour of
it , to whom it is bonde : but alfo when fhe hath taught that we arc
fwaruedoutof kinde from the rrucoriginall&ftateof our creation,
iheimmcdiatlyaddethjthat Chrift by whom we come againeinto
fauour with God, is fet before vs for an example, that we fhould ex-
preffe the forme thereof in our hfe. What may a man require more
cffeduall then this one thing? Ye what may a manne require more
than this onely thing? For if the Lorde hath by adoption made vs
children with this condition, that our life (houlde refemble Chrift
the bond of our adoption: if we do not geue and auoweour fehies
to right eoufncire,we do not onely with moft wicked breach of alle-
giauncc depart from our ere atour, but alfo we forfweare bimtobc
our fauionr.Then the Scripture taketh matter of exhortation out of
all the benefices of God,which ihi rehcrfeth vnto vSi& all the partcf
Cap.^. Of the maner how to receiuc
Mala. I. of our faluation. And flieweth ihat fith God hath Ihewed himfclfc a
^ father vnto vs , we are worthy to be codemned of extreme vnthanke-
fulnefle , if we do not hkewife in our behalfe fliewe our felues chiU
Epher. dren vnto him. Sith Ghrift hath deanfed vs with the wafhing of his
^1 *h ^'^^^j ^^^ ^^'^^ made vs partakers of this cleanling by baptjfme , it
' ' is not femcly that we flioulde be fpotted with newe filthinelfe. Siih
Ephef. he hath grafFed vs into his body , we muft carefully take hcde that
1 5. we fprinclc not any (pot or blot fpon vs that are his members. Sith
Heb.io jjg i^j^ ^g|£g that is our head , is afcended into heauen , it behoueth
^^ * vs that laying away earthly affedion , we do with all our heart afpire
to heauenward : Sith the holy Ghoft hath dedicated vs temples to
f .Cor. God, we muft endcuour that Gods glorie may be honorably fet out
*• by vs,and muft not do any thing whcrby we may be prophaned with
V ' * filthineffe of (inne : Sith both our foule and our body are ordeined
loh.15. toheaucniy incorruption and an vupcfiHimg crowne, we muft dili-
3. gently trauaiU,that the fame may be kept pure and vncorrupted vnto
Ephe 5. the jjy of the Lorde. Thefe (I fay) be the beft layed foundations to
I Cor.\* '^^^^^ ^ mans life, and fuch as the like arc not to be found among ihc
a.. Cor. Phylofophers , which in commendauon of vertue do neuerclimbc
€. abouethenaturalldignitieofman.
B.TheC ^ And here is a fit place to fpeakc vnto them , that hauinge no-
^•*^* thing but the title and badge of Chrift,yct would be named Chriftias,
But with what face do they boft of his holy name : fith none hauc
any fellowftiip with Chrift,but they that haue receiued a true know-
Bpbe.4. ledge of him out of the worde of the Gofpell? But the Apoftle faith,
that all they hauc not rightly learned Chrift,that are not caught that
they muft caft away the old man which is corrupted according to the
defire of errour,and hauc not put on Chrift. Therefore it is proued
that they falfly,yea|and wrongfully pretedc the knowledge of Chrift,
although they can eloquently and roundely talke of the Gofpcll,
For itisnotadodrine oftong,butofIife; and is not concciuedas
otherlearningsbe , with onely vnderftanding and memorie, butis
then onely receiued when it polfefleth the whole foule , and findetb
a feate and place to hold it in the moft inward afteftion of the heart.
Therefore either let then cefle ,to the fcl.iunder of God , to boft of
that which they are not,or let them ftiew themfclues not vnworthy
fcholars for Chrift their maifter.We haue gcuen the firftplace to the
dodrine whcrin our religion is conteincd, bccaufe our faluation be-
ginneth at it: but the fame muft be poured into our hearic,and pafTe
into our maners, yea and transforme vs into it,th3tit be not vnfrute-
full vnto Vis. If the Phdofophcrs doiuitly chafe againft them, and do
with
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3.^ 27P
with fhamefull reprochc driue them from their companie, that pro-
fdllng an art that ought to be the rcholcroaiftresofhfe,cloturneic
into a Sophifticall babbhng : with how much better reafon ihall we
deteft tliefe trifling Sophifters , that are contented to role the Gof-
pell vpon the top of rfieir longes , the effeduall working whereof
ought to pearce into the innermoft affedions of the heart , to reft in
the foule, & to alter the whole man a hundred times morc,than the
colde exhortations of Philofophers.^
5 Yet do I not require, that the mancrs of a Chtiftian man
fauour of nothing buttheabfolutcpofpel;which neucrthelefle both
were to be wifhed , and we muft endcuour vs toward it. But I do not
fo feuerely require a Gofpellike perfedion,that I would not acknow-
ledge him foraChriftian that hath not yet atteincdvnto it. For fo
. fhould all men be excluded from the Church , fi th there is no man
found that is not by a great fpace diftant from it, and many hauc he-
thcrto but a htle way proceded toward it.who yet fhould be vniuftly
caft away. What the? let that be fct for the marke before our eyes, to
which alone all our endcuour may be diredcd. Let that be apointed
the gole for vs to runne and trauaile vnto. For it is not lawefull for
thee fo to make partition with God , to take vpon thee part of ihefc
thingesthat are commaunded thee in his word , and to leaue part at
thine owne choife. For firll of all he eucry where commendeth intc-
gritie as the chiefe part of worlliipping him: by which word he mea-
neth a pure fimplicitie of mind that is without all deceitful colour &
faining : againft which a double heart is fet as cotrarie ; as if it fliould
be faidjthat the beginning of liuing vprightly is fpirituall , when the
inward aflldion of the mind is without faining dedicate to God to
obferue holinefTe & righteoufnes.But becaufe no man in this earthly
prifon of the body hath fo great ftrength to haft with fuch frcftineflc
of runninge, as he perfedly ought to do, and the greater number arc
fo fcble,that with ftaggering and haltingCjyca and creping vpon the
groundjthey auaunce but flowly forward : let vs euery one go accor-
ding to the meafure of his litle pOwer , and procede on our iourney
bcgon. No man (hall go fo vntowardly , but he (hall euery day get
fomc ground,though it be but litlc.Therfore let vs not cefle to trauail
fo,that we may continually procede fomwhat in the way of the Lord.
And let vs not defpeire vpon the fclendcrncfle of our going forward,
for howfocuer the fuccelfe aunfwerc not our defirc, yet we haue not
loft our labourewhen this diy paffcth yefterday : fo that with pure
flmphcitie we loke vnto our mai ke, and long toward the ende of our
courfe,notfooihingly flattering our (eiues^nor tender ly bearing with
Cap.y. Of the maner how to rectiue
our ov^ne euilsjbuc with continuall endeuour trauailing to this,thilc
wcmayftill become better than ourfelues,tillweatteinetogoofi-
ne(re it felfe:vvhich in decde we feke for and followe all our life lon^:
but wc lliall then only atteine it,when being vnclothed of the weakc-
nes of the flcil),we fhalbe receiued into the full fellowfliip thereof.
The vij. Chapter.
The fkmwe if a Chrijlian life : where U entreated cf the for faking ef tur ftlnei,
Lbeit that the lawe of tl|e Lorde baue a mod aptly well dif-
pofed order to frame a mans hfe , yet it femed good to the
heaueiy fcholemaifter to inftrud men yet with a more exa<a
trade to the fame rule that he had fct fourth in his law. And
tlTC beginning of that trade, is this :that it is the dutie of the faithful!
Kom. to yelde their bodies to God a liuing , holy and acceptable facrificc
la.i. vnto him : and that therein i^andeth the true vvorlliipping of him,
Herevponis gathered occafion to exhorte men, that they do not
applie them felues to the fafhion of this world, but be transformed
inrcnewinge of their minde, that they may proue what thewill-of
God is. Nowe this is a great thing , that we be confecrate ar^d dedi-
cate to God : that we fliould from thenctfourth thinkc, fpcake, ima-
gine,or do nothing but to hisglorie.For the thing that is confecrate,
can not be applied to vnholy vies , without great wronge done vnto
him. Ifwe be not our own, but the Lordcs, itappearcth v/haferrour
is to be auoidtd.and whcreunto aJl the domges of our life arc to be
direded. We are not our ownc : therefore let neither our owne rea-
fon nor our ownc will bcare i ule in our counfelles and doinges. We
are not our ownc : thtrefore let vs not make this the ende for vs to
tend vnrojto (eke that which may be expedict for vs according to the
fleHi. We arc not our owne : therefore fo much as wc may,lei vs for-
get our fclucs and all things that are our owne.On the other fidcjWC
are Gods : therefore let vs hue and dye to him. We are Gods : there-
fore If t his wifdome and WiU gouerne all our doinges.We are Gods:
therefore let all the partes of our life tend towardc him as their onely
lawful end.Oh how much hath he profitcd,thathauing learned that
himfclfe is riOt his owne, hath taken fro him felfe the rule & gouernv
F0.14. ment of him felfe togeueittoGod. For as this is y moftftrongwor-
*. king ptftiknce to dcflroy men , that they obey tl^efelucsrfo itis the
ont ly haiicn oFfafecie , neither to knowe nor will any thin<^ by hirn
ftlfe, bur onely to follow God going before him. Let this therefore
l>c the hift llcppc,thai man depaitc fcom himfelfc,that he may apply
all
i
The grace of Chrifh Lib.3.' 280
dll the force of his wit to the obeying of the Lordc, Obeying I call
not oncly that which ftandeth in obedience of the worde , but thac
whereby the minde of man, voide from his owne fcnfualitie of flefh,
bendeth it felfe wholly to the will of Gods fpirit.Of this transforma-
tion (which Paule calleth renewing of the minde ) where as it is the Ephc.^,
firft entrie into life, all the Phylolophers were ignoraunt. For they 25.
make onely Reafon the gouernefl'c of man : they ihinkc fhe onely
ought to be heard : finally to her onely they gcue and alligne the rule
of manners. But the Chnftian Phylofophic biddeth her co geue" Gala.i,
placCjand to ycld and be fubied to the holy Ghoft : fo that man now 20.
may not liue himfelfe,but bearc Chrift liuing and reigning in him.
1 Herevpon followeth alfo this other point , that we feekc not
the thingcs that be our owne > but thofe thinges that be according to
the will of the Lord,and that make to the aduauncemet of liis glory.
This is alfo a profe of great profiting,that in a manner forgetting our
felues,and altogether leaning the regarde of our felues, we trauail to
employ ourftudy to God and his commaundements. For when the
Scripture biddedi vs to leaue priuate regard of our feluesjit doth not
onely race out of our mindcs the couctoufnefle of hauing,the gredy
feking for power and fauour of men : but alfo rootcth out ambition
and all defire of worldly glorie , and other more fecrete peftilences.
Truly a Chnftian man muft be fo falhioned and difpofed , tothinkc
throughout all his life.that he hath to do with God.In this fort,as he-
fhall examine all his doings by Gods will and iudgeraent:fo he fhall
reuerently dired vnto him all y earneftly bent diligence of his minde.
For he that hath learned to loke vpon God in all things that be hath
to dojis therewithal! turned a way from all vaine thoughtes. This is
that forfaking of our felues,which Chrift euen from their firft begin-
ning of inftrudion fo earneftiy ^aue in charge to his Difciplssiwhich
when it ones hath gotten poffefTion in the heart leaueth no place at
alljfirft neither for pride,nor dirdainfulnes,nor vain glorious bofting,
then neither for couetife,nor filchy luft,nOf rjotoufnefle, nor deinti*
neire,nor for other euils that are engedred of the loue of our fclucs.
Contrariwife whcrfoeuer it reigneth not,therc either moft filthy vi-
ces do range without ftiame , or if there be any fpicc of vcrtue , it is
corrupted with peruerfe delire of glory. For fhew me a man, if thou
canftjthat vnles he haue forfakenhim felfc according to y comaun-
dement of the Lord,will of his owne free will vfe goodnciTe among
men. For all they that haue not ben polTefled with this fehn?, if they
haue followed vertue,they haue done it at y leaft for praifcs fake. And
all y Phylofophersthateu^er molt of all affirmed chat \ertue wasc«»
Capi/. Ofthemancrhowtoreceiuc
be delired for it fdfes r\ke,were pufFcd vp with Co great pride,that it
appeared that they defircd vertue for no other ihinge, but that they
jj)ighr haue matter to be proude vpon. But God is lo nothing at all
dehted > neither with thole papers for the peoples breath , nor with
thefe fwcliing bsaftes , that he pronounceth that they haue already
receiued their rewarde in the world , and makech harlottes and Pu-
bhcanes nerer to the kingdome of heaucnjthan them. And yet we
haue not throughly declared with how many and how great ftoppesv
man is hindred from that which is right , (o long as he hath nor for-
faken him felfe.For it was truely faid m time paftjthat there is a world
of vices hidden in the foule of man. And ihoucanft finde no other
remedies, but denying thy fclfe,aiid leauing regarde of thy felfe, to
bende thy minde to feeke thofe thinges that the Lorde rcquireth of
thec,and to feke them therefore onely becaufe they pleafe him.
g In an other place the fame Paule doth more plainly, although
fliortly,go through all the partes of a well ordred life , faying : The
grace of God thatbringetn faluation vntoall men , hath appeared
and tcachetb vs, that we ihould denie all vngodlinefle, and worldly
luftes, and that we lliould hue fobre piinded, rightcou/lv and Godly
in this prefent worlde , loking for the blefled hope and glorious ap-
pearing of the mighty Qod,andof our fauiourjefus Cbrift, which
gaue him felfe for vs to redeme vs from all vnrighteoufnefle , and to
purge vs a peculiar people vnto him felfe feruently geuen vnto good
works. For after that he hath fet forth the grace of God to encoragc
thcm,to make redy the way for vs to worfliippe God,he taketh away
two floppes that do moft hinder vs,that is to fay jVngodlincife, wher-
unto we ar^ naturally to much enclined,and Worldly dcfircs, which
cxtendcyurthcr. And vnder the name ofvngodlineire5he not onely
meaneth fuperftitions , biitalfo comprehendeth all that difagreeth
with the' carneft feare of God. And worldly luftes are ipeftedas
much as the aftedions of the Helli. Therfore he commaundeth vs in
refpcd of both the tables of thelavve , to put of our owne wit, and
to forfake all that our owne reafon and will informeth vs. And all the
doinges of our life he bringeth into three partes,fobrietie,riohteour-
neflb, and godlineffetof the which fobrietic without doubt lignifieth
as well chaftitic and tempcraunce, as a pure and mealurably fparing
vfe of temporall thingsand a pacient fufferance of poucrtic. Rightc-
Qufnefle conteineth all the duties of equitic , to geue cucry man his
owne. The thirde is Godline0e, that feucrcth vs from the defilinges
of the world,& with true holineife ioineth vs to God. Thefe thinsjs,
when they be knit together wiUi an vnfcp arable knot , make a full
pctfed-
The grace ot Chriir. Lib.j. 251
pcrfedion. But for as much as nothing is more hard > than fcrfaking
the reafon of the flcfli, yea fubdumge and renouncing her defiies, to
geue our felucs to Gcd and our brethren.and to fiudie for an ange-
likelife in the filthy ftate of ihis earth : therefore Paule, to loofe our
mind-s from all fnares , calleth vs back lo the hope of bkHed im-
morMline , adn;onifhing vs not to fti lue n\ vaine '. bccaufe as Chrift
hath ones appeared the reciemcr/o at his laft commin[:,he (liall fhew
thefrute ot the faluation that he haih purchaced. And ihushedri-
ueth awav theenncementcs that bhnde vs ,and ma^ke vs not to afpire
as we ought to the htaucnly elone : yea and he teachi^th that we
muft trauaiil as men being from home in this worlde , that the hea-
ucnly inheritaunce be not loft or fall away from vs.
4 Nowe in thefe wordes we perceiue , that the forfaking of our Rom.i x
felues hath partly rcfpcd to meUjand panly,yea chiefly to Gcd. For 'O;
where as the fcrirturc biddeth vs fo lo behaue our felues with men, '^"'^•^
that wcprcferre thtm before vs in honour,that we faithfully employ
our lelucs wholly to proc4jre their commoditiesithc^efoie it greueth
fuch commaundcments as our minde is not able to rcceiue , but fiift
bemg made voide of naturall fenfe. For (with fuch blindcnefle wc
runne all mto loue of our felues)cucry man thinketh I im ftlfe to hauc
a iuft caufe to aduaunce him felfcjand'to defpife all other in compa-
rifonofhim felfe. If God hauc gcuen vs any good gift, by and by
bearingour felues bold therof wehft vp our courage,& not only fwel,
but in a maner buift with pride. The vices wherewith we abound,we
do both diligently hide from other,and to our felues we flatteringly
fainc them light and fclendc r , and fometime embrace them for ver-
tues. And if the fame good gif:es , which we praife in our felucs >or
better do appearc in other, leaft we (houlde be compelled to geue
place to them , we do with our enuioufnelTc deface them and finde
fault withjhem. If there be any faultesln them, we are not conieced
fcuerelyand fharpely tomarkeit,but we alfo odioufly amplifie it.
Herevpon groweth that infolence , that eucry one of vs, as though
he were priuikged from the common eftate, would be hier than the
reft,and carelefly and proudly fet light by eucry man> or defpife them
as inferiours.The poore yeld to the rich, bafe people to gentlemen,
feruantes to their maifters,vnlearned to the learned:but there is no
man that doth not nourifhe within himfelfe fome opinion ofex-
cellcncie . So euery man in flattering himfelfe , bcareth a certaine
kingdome in his breft . For prefumptuoufly taking vpon them fom-
what whereby to pleafe themfelues , they iudge vpon the wittes and
manners of other menne.But if they come to contention,there bur-
NN
Cap.7- Of the maner how to receitic
ftcth our their poifon.For many do make a fhevve of great mekeneSy
fo longe as tbey finde all things gentle andlouely : but howe many
a one is there thatkepeth thatcontinuall courfeofmodeftie, when
he is pricked and ftirred to anger ? And there is no remedie hereof,
but that the moft hurtfuU peftilence of loue,of foueraingtie and felfe
loue be rooted out of the bottome of their heartes , as it is rooted
out by the dodrine of the Scripture.For there we are fo taught, that
we muft remember that the good giftes that God hath geuen vs,are
not our owne good rhings,but the free giftes of God,whereof if any
be proude,they bewraye their owne vnthankefulnefTe. Who maketh
thee to excell ? Paule faith , if thou haft receiued all things , why doft
thou boft as if they were not geuen thee ? Then , that we muft with
continuall rcknowledging of our faultes , call our felues back to hu-
militie. So fhall there remaine in vs nothing to be proude vpon , but
there ftialbe much matter to abace our felues, Againe , we are com-
maundedjwhatfoeuer giftes of God we fee in other men,fo ro reue-
rence andefteme thofe gifts, that v/e alio honoui thofe mennc in
whom they be.For it were a great lewdnes for vs , to take from them
that honour , the God hath vouchefaued to geue them. As for their
faultSjWe are taught to winke at them,not to chcrilh them with flat-
tering, but that we ftiould not by reafon of thofe faul res triumphe
agamft them » to whome we ought to beare good will and honour.
So fiiall it come to pafte , that with what man fo euer we haue to do>
we ihiall behaoe our felues not onely tempeiatly and modeftly , but
alfo gently andfrendly.Asaman (hallneuer come any other way to
true mekcneife , but if he haue a heart endued with abacing of him-
fclfe,and reuerencing of other.
^ Nowe howe hard is it , for thee to do thy dutrc in feking the
profit of thy neighbour ? Thou ftialt herin labour in vainc , vnlefle
thou depart from regard of thy relfe,and in a manner put of thy felfe.
For howe canft thou performe thefe things that Paule teacheth to
be the workes of charitie,vnle{re thou forfake thy felfe, to geue thy
felfe wholy to other ? Charitie (faith he) is patient and gentle , not .
proude,not difdainefull, enuieth not, fwelleth not , feeketh not her
owne,is not angry,&c.lf this one thing be rec]uired,that we feke not
the things that arc our owne,we fhall do no fmall violence to nature,
which fobcndeth vs to the onely loue ofour lelues, that it doth not
eafily fuffer vs negligetly to pafle ouer our felues & our owne things,
to watch for other mens commodities, yea to depart without owne
right to refigne it to an other. But the Scripture, to leade vs thether
as it were by the hand , warneth vs that what fo euer gracious giftes
( wc
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 282
\vc obteine of the Lorde, they are committed vnto vs vpon this con-
dition , that they lliould be bellowed to the common benefit of the ,
Church : and that therefore the true vfe of all Gods graces is a li-
beral] and bountifull communicating of them to other . There can
be noccrtaine rule, nor rnorc forceablcexhortatio could be deuifed
for the kepingc of the fame , than when we be taught that all the
good giftes tliat we haue,are things of Goddeliuercd,commuted to
ourtiuft vpon this condition , that they llioulde be difpofed to the
benefit of our neighbours. But the Scripture goeth yet further, whefi
iteomparcth them to the poweis wherewith the members of mans
body are endued.No meber hath his power for himfelf^nor appheih
it to his priuate vfe ; but poureih it abrode into the other mcmbres
of the lame bodyjand takcth no profit therof, but fuch as proccdcth
from the common commoditie of tjie whole body. So whatfoeuer a
godly man is able to do,he ought to be able to do it for his brethren^
in prouidinge none otherwife priuately for himfelfe , but fo that his
mmde be bent to the common edification of the Church , Let this
iherfore be our order for kindnefle and doing good:that w^harfoeuer
God hath beftowed vpon vs,whereby we may helpe our neighbour,
we arc the Bailies thereof,and bound to render accompt of the difpo-
fing of it. And that the onely right difpofingis that which is tried by
the rule of Joue.So lliall it come to pafle,that we ihall alway not only
ioine the trauaiU for other mens commoditie with the care of our
owne profit, but alfo fet it before the care of our owne. And that we
fhotild not happen to be ignorant that this is the true lawe of difpo-
fing all the giftes that we rcceiue of God,he hath in the oldc time fee
the fame lawe euen in the fmaleft gifces of his liberaliiie.Foi he c6- Exo,a2.
maunded the firft frutesof corneto be oftired vnto him , by which ^^ ^"*^
the people might teftifie that it was vnlawfuU for them to take any *^* '^*
flute of the goods that were notfirft confecrate tohim.lf the giftes
of God be fo onely then fandified vnto vs , when we haue with our
owne handc dedicate them to the authour thereof, it is euident that
fit is an vntrue abufe thereof that doth not fauour of fuch dedicatio.
But it fhalbe vainc for thee to so about to enriche the Lorde with
communicating to him of thy things. Therefore fith thy liberalitie
can not extende vnto him, as the Prophet faith, thou muft vfe it Pfa. itf.
toward his faintes that are in earth . Therefore almes are compared ?•
to holy oblations, that they may nowc be correfpondent to thcfc of "5 ^*
the lawe.
6 But,y we {hould not be wcry vv doing good (which otherwife
muft needes come (juickly to paire)ihat other thing muft be adjoined
NN ij
Cap, 7. Of the maner how to receiue
: Cor. which the Apoftle fpeakcth of.that chaiitie is patient and not maued
' 3" 4* to anger.The Lorde commaundeth to do good to all vniuerfally, of
whom a great part are moft vnworthy,if they be confidered by cheit
owne deleruing.But here y Scripture i iclpeth wich a very good meane,
when it teacheth that we muft not haue refped what men deftrue of
themfelucSjbut that the image of God is to be confidered in ail men,
to which we owe all honour and louc. But the fame is mo(t diligently
to be marked in them of the houfeboldc of faith , in fo much as it is
Gala.6. in them renewed and reflorcd by the Spirite of Chrift. Therefore
'°' whatfoeuer man thou light vpon , that n^edeththy helpe jthonhaft
Efa, 5?. jiQc^ufe jq withdraw thy felfe from doing him good . If thou (ay
^* that he is a ftranger : but the Lorde hath geuen him a marke , thai
ought to be familiar vntothee, by the reafo thathe forbiddeth ihec
todefpife thine owne flelli. If thou fay that he isbafcand nought
worth:buc the Lord fliewcth him to be fuch a one,to whom he haih
vouchefaued to geue the beautie of his image.lf thou fay that thou
owcfi him nothing for any th.ing that he hath done for thee: but
Godh?.th fet him as it were in his place jinrefpedof whom ,thou
knoweft fo many and fo great benefites wherewith he hath bound
thee vnto him. If thou fay that he is vnworthy that thou fliouldeft
labour any thing at all for his fake : but the image of God whereby
he is commended to theejis worthy that thou fliouldeft geue thy felf
Mat.tf. Q^ gj that thou haft vntoit Butif he hauc notonlv deferuedno good
jg . at thy hande, but alfoprouc^ed thee with wronss and eueli doings:
euen this is no iufte caufe why thou fliouldeft cefle bo.h to loue him
and to do for him the dutifull workes of loue. Thou wilt faVjhe hath
far otherwife deferued of me. But what hath the Lorde deferued?
Which when he commaundeth thee to forgeue all wherein he hath
offended thee, truely he wiUeth the fame to be imputed to himfelfe.
Luc.iy. Truely,this is that only way to come to that which is vtterly againft
^ - the nature of man, much rrorc is it hard for man. I meane, to loue
^^, * * them that hate vs,to recompenfe eucll with doinge good, to render
bleflinses for rcproches : if we remember that we mutf not conlider
the malice of men, but loke vpon the imsgc of God in them, which
defacing and blotting out their fauJ res , doeth with the beautie and
dignitie of it (elfe allure vs »o embrace it.
7 1 herefore this Mortification Oiill then onely take place in vs,
when v/epcrformc the duetiesof chariric. But it is not he that per-
formeth them , that onely doeth all the dutifull workes of charitic,
alrhouy.h he Icaue none of ihem vndone, but he that doth rhem of a
^ finccre affedion of loue.For u may happen^ihat a man may fully per-
form c
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j^ 285
forme to all mcnne alJ that he oweth , To much as concemeth out-
ward duties : and yet he may be far from the true performing of it.
For you may fee fome that would feeme very liberall , which yet do
gcue nothing but either with pride of loke , or with choilillinefTe o£
wordes they vpbraide it. And we be come to fuch wretchedneiTe in
this vnhappy worlde, that almoin no almes are geuen of any menne,
or atleaft of themoft parte of men,without rcproching.VVhichper-
uerfnefl'efliouldnothaue bene tolerable among the very heathen.
For of Chriftians is fomwhat more required than to fliew a chereful-
neile in counten3nce,and make their doinges louely with gentlenfle
of wordes . Firft they muft take vpon them the perfonage of him
whom they fee to neede their helpe,and then fo pitie their cafe, as if
themfelues didfeleand fufferit;fo that.they may bee caried wjch
felin2:e ofmcrcie and gentlenefle euen as they would betohelpc
thcmfclucs.He that fhall come fo minded to helpe his brethren, will
not ondy not defile his doinges with any arrogante or vpbraydmge,
but alfo neither will defpife his brother to whom he doth good as
one needing his helpe , nor treade him vnder footeas one boundc
vnto him:no more than we vie to reproch a ficke member,for eafing
whereof the whole body laboreth , or to thinke it fpecially bounde
to the other members , bycaufe it hath drawen more helpe vnto it
than it hath recompenfed.For itis thought that the'common enter-
p arming of duties betvvene members of one body,hath no free kindc
ofgifte } but rather that it is a payementof that which being due by
the lawe of nature it were monftruous to denie . And by this reaforj
it fhall followe,' hat he may not thinke liimfelfedifcharged that hath
performed one kinde of duetic , as it is commonly vfed , that when a
riche manne hath geuen any thinge of his owne , he leaueth other
charges to other men, as not belonging to him. But rather euery
manne fliall thnke thus with himfelfe , that he is altogether detter to
his neighbours, & that he muft determine none other ende of vfing
his hberaline,but when abihtie faileth,which how large fo cucr it be,
muft be meafured by the rule of charitie.
8 Now let vs more fully declare the principall parte of fo'faking
our felucsjwhich we faid to haue refped to God. We haue faid much
of it already, which it were fuperfluous to rehearfc againe : it flialbc
fuflicie t to entreate of it fo far as it frameth vs to quietnefle of mindc
and fufterance. Firft therefore in feking the commoduie or quiet«
nelfe of this prefent life , the Scripture calleth vs hereunto , that re-
figninc vs and our thinges to the Lords will,we fhould yeld vnto him
the affcj^iQS of our heart to be tamed and fubdued.To couet wealth
NN iij
Cap.7. Of the maner how to receiuc
and honors , to compafle authoririe , to heape vp riches , to gather
together allfuch folhes as lerue for royaltie andpompe,ourluflis
ourragious,and our gredineffe infinite.On the other fide of pouerty,
ignobilitie, and bafe eftate , We haue a maruellous feare and maruel-
lous hatred , that moue vs to trauaile by all meanes to efchue them.
Hereby a man may fee , how vnquiet a minde they haue, how many
(hiftes ihcy atremptjWith what ftudies they wery their life,that France
their life afcer their owne deuife •• to atteine thofe thinges that their
afFcdion of ambition or couetoufneflTe requireth , and on the other
fide to efcape pouertie and bafenefle.Therefore the godly muft kepe
this way, rhat they be not entangled with fijch fnares. Firft let them
not either defire ,or hope for , or thinke vpon any other meane of
profpermgjthan by the blelfing of the Lorde:and therefore let them
fafely and boldely reft themfelues vpon it. For how fo euer the flefh
thmke it felfe fufficiemof her felfe, whenfhe either trauaileth by
her owne diligence, or endeuoreth with her owne ftudie,or is holpen
by the fauour of men,to the atteining of honour and wealth:yet it is
certaincjthat all thefe thin?,es are nothing,and that we fhall nothmg
preuaile with wit or crauaile,but in fo much as the Lorde fliall profper
both But on the other fide his onely blefllng findeth a way through
all ftoppcs , to make all things procede with vs to a ioyfull and lucky
Ciide. Then how foeuerwe may moftof all obteine any glorie or
wealth without it (as we daily fee the wicked to get heapcs of great
honours and richeffe) yet for as much as they vpon whom refteth
the curfe,do fele no parcell of felicitie,we can obteine nothing with-
out his blefiing that Ih.ill not turne vs to euell. And it is not at all to
be couetedjthat maketh men more miferable.
9 Therefore if we bcleuc that all the rneanc of profperous fuc-
celle and fuch as is to be wifhed , confifteth in the onely blefilng of
God, which being abfent, all kindesof mifeiie and calamitie muft
happen vntovs:this remaineth alfo,that we do not gredyiy en-
deuour to wealth and honours ftanding vpon our owne finefle of wit
or diligence , nor leaning to the fauour of men , nor trufting vpon a
vaine imagination of fortune, but that we alway looke vnto the
Lorde, to be led by his guiding to what fo euer lot he hath prouided.
So firft it fhall come to pafle , that we fliall not violently rpfli to the
catching of richefle and inuadingof honours, by wronge, by guile
and euell crafty meanes,or extortion with doing iniury to our neigh-
bours , but fhall onely followe thofe fortunes that may not leade vs
from innocence. For who may hope for the helpe of Gods bleffing
among fraudes , excortionsj and other futde meanes of wickednefTe?
For
The grace of Chrift. Lib.;. 284
For as Gods blelling foUowethnomanbuthim that thinketh pu-
rely,and doth rightly , (o it calleth back all them of whom it is defi-
redjfrom crooked thoughtes, and corrupt doinges. Then we fhalbc
bridled that we burne not with inmeafurable deiire of growing rich,
nor ambitioufly gape for honours. For with what face may a man
truft to be holpen of God, to obteine thofe chinges that he defireth
. againft his worde ? For God forbidde that God fhoulde geue the
helpe of his blefling to that which he curfeth with his owne mouth.
Laft of all, if it fuccede not according to our wifh and hope , yet wc
fhalbe rcftraincd from impatience, and from curfing our e{late whac
foeuer it be : bycaufe we know that that is to murmure againft God,
at whofc will richefle and pouertie j bafenefle and honours are diC-
pofcd. Brefcly , he that refteth himfelfe in fuch forte as is a forefaid
vpon the blefling of God , neither will by euell futtelties hunt foe
thofe things that menne are wont outragioufly to couct, by which
crafty meanes he thinketh that he Ihall nothing preuaile : nor if any
thing happen profperoufly will impute it to himfelf, and to his ownc
diligence cndcuour or to fortune , but will affigne it to God the au*
thour.But if while other mens eftates do fiorirn,he go but fclenderly
forwardjyea or Oide backewardjyet he will beare his ill fortune with
greater quietnelfe and moderatio of minde,than a prophane mannc
will beare a meanely good fucceire , which is not altogether fo good
as he delircd-.bycaufe he hath a comfort wherein he may more quiet-
ly reft, than vpon the hieft toppe of wealth and authoritie : bycaufe
he accomptcth that his thinges are ordered by God as is auailable
for his faluation.So we fee that Dauid was minded.and yeldeth him- pfa^j, j^
felfe to be ruled by God5he declareth himfelfe to be like to a weined
childe , and that he walketh not in high things or marUellous aboue
himfelfe.
10 And the godly mindes ought to haue thatquietnefle and fuf-
ferance not onely confiftmg in this behalf: but alfo it muft extend to
all chaunces wherunto our prefent life is fubied.Thereforc no man
hath rightly forfaken himfelfe, but he hath forefigned himfelfe vp
wholly to the Lorde , that he fufFreth all the partes of his life to be
gouerned by his will.He that is lb framed in minde,what fo euer hap-
pen,will neither thinke himfelfe miferable, nor will with cnuioufnes
againft God complaine of his fortune.Howe neceflary this afFedion
is , fhall herby appeare , if you confider to howe many chaunces wc
be fubie6t.Diuerfe kindes of difeafes do trouble vs,fometime the pe-
ftilence cruelly reigneth , fometime we are {harply vexed with cala«
eiities ofwarre I fometime froftor hailedeuouringthchopeofthe
NN iiij
Cap.8. Of the maner how to rcceiue
yere bringeth b;ircnneire,that diueth vs to dearth: fom time our wife,
parentes, children or kinsfolkts are taken away by death , our houfe
is confumcd with fier.'ihefe be the thingesat chauncing whereof
men curie their hfe,detetttheddy of their birth , haue heauen and
light m execration, murmure againll: God, and (as they be eloquent
inblafphemics) accufe him of vniuOice and crueltie . But a faithfull
manne mult euen in ihefe chaunces beholde the mercyfull kindenefl'e
and fatherly tenderneire of God.Therefore whether he fee his houfe
deitroyedjhis kinfefolke flaine , yet he will not therefore ceife to
praife God^ but rather will turne himfelfc to this thought : Yet the
Grace of the Lorde that dwclltth in my houfe , will notleaue it de-
folate. Orif when his corne is blsfted or bitten , or confumed with
frofleS;Or beaten downe with hade, he fee famine at handjyet he will
not defpeir,nof fpeake liatefuUy of God,but will remaine in this con^
fa. 79' Hdence, We are yet in the Lordes protedion, and ihepe brouj^ht vp
^' in hispaftures : he therefore will Hride vs foodeeueninextremtft
barrenefle. Or if he bee troubled with (icknelle , euen then he will
not be difcouraged with buternelTe of forrow , to hw^W out into im-
patience and quarell thus with God : but confidenng the righteouO-
neffe and lenitie in Gods corredion,he will call himfeife back to pa-
tience. Finally, whatfo euer (h.ill h.jppen,hecaufe he knoweth iter*
deincdbythe hand of God, he will take ic with a v/ell pieafed and
thankefull mindejealt he fhould llubbornly rcUil his duthoritie, into
whofe power he hath yelded himfclie and ail his. 1 herefore let that
foolifh and moft miierable comfort of the Heathtnbe far from a
Chriftianmans heart , which to flrengthen their rnindes agajnltad-
uer(ities,did impute the fame to fortimc,with whom rht y compted ic
foolifh to be angry, becaufe (he was blindeand vnaduired,thatb!in-
ddy wounded both the deferuing and vndeferuing For contrai i wife
this is the rule of godlintflejthattheonely hand of God is theiudge
and gouerne> of boch fortunes,and that it runneth noi forward with
vnaduifed fodeinerage,bur with moft orderly lufticedealcth among
vs both good thinges and euell.
The viij. Chapter.
of the bear'mge of the erojfe^ which it a part of the forfaking ofourfeluet,
BVt a Godly minde muft yet climbe vp hier, euen to that wher-
untoChnft calleth his difciples,t,hateuery one take vpliis
croife. For all whom the Lorde hath chofcn and vouchefaucd
Co recciue into his companie , muft prepare themfeiues to a
- hard.
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 285
hard ,trauailclome and vnquiete life, and full of many and diueric
kjndes ofincommodities.bo it is the will of the hcauenly father, to
exercife them in fuch lorte, that he may haue a ti ue proofe of them
that be his.Beginnmg at Chrift,his Hi ft.begotcen fonne, he procce- ^
deth with tins order toward all his childien.For whereas Chrill was Matt,
the beftbelou.d fonne aboue the ieit,& in. whom the fathers mindc 17.&
was fuJlv pltafed , yet we fee howe he was not tenderly and deintily 5»
handcled:fo that ir may be truely fayd, that he was not only exerci-
i^di with a perpetuali crolfe fo long as he dwelled in earth,but that al
his life was nothing clfe but a kinde of continuall crofle. The Apo-
file Iheweth the caufe thereof to be, that it bchoued that he fhouldc
learnc obedience by thole things that he fufFred. Why then fhould
we prmilege our f eiues from that eftatCjwherunco it behoued Chrift
our head to be fubied.fpecially lith he became fubied thereunto for
ourcaufe,tolliew v$ an example of patiece in himfelfe?Therforethc
Aportle faith that this is the appointed end of al y childrc of Godjto j^^ g
be fafhioned like vnto him. Whereupon alfo in hard & fharp chaun-
ccSjwhich are reckenedaduerHties and euils, arifeth a great comfort
vnto vs,riiat we communicate with the fuffrings of Chrift-.thatas he
cntred out of a m.i^e of all troubles into the heauenly glory , fo we
may be diuerfe tribulations be brought into the fame glory . For fo 4 a ,
faith Paul himfelfe,thatwhenwelearnethecommunicatingeofhis 22.
affli(flions,we do allbconceiueihe power of his refurredion:& whe Philif
we are fafliioned like vnto his deatn,we are fo prepared to the fclow- ^°*
(hip of his glorious rifinsie againe. Howe much may this auaile to a-
fwagc all the paincfulncire of the crolTe , that the more we are aflBi-
ded With aduerfities , fo much the more fure is our felowlhippe with
Chrift confirmed?by communicating whereof, our fuflrings are not
only made blefled vnto vs,but alfo do much help vs to the furthcracc
of our faluuion. ^
z Belidc char,our Lorde had no ncede to take vpon him to beare
the croffcbut to teftific & proue his obedience to his father : but we
for diuerfe caufes, haue neede to lead our life vnder a cotinual crofle.
Fiift(is we be naturally bent to attribute all thinges to ourflcfh)vn-
lefle our weakcnes be (hewed vs as it were before our eyes,we do ea-
(ily eftccme our owne ftrength aboue due mcafurc , & dout not that
whatfoeuer happen , it will continue vnbroken and vnouercome a*
gainft all harde aflaultes . Whereby we are caried into a foohfhe
and vaioe confidence of fle(h,and then trufting thereupon , we fttib*
bornly waxc proud againft God himfelfe, as though our own powers
)viihout his grace did fuffice vs. This arrogancy he can no way bet«
Cap.8. Of the maner how to rcceiue
ter beate dovvne, than when he proueth vnto vs by experience, not
only how feeblc,but alfo how fraile we be. Therfore he afflidech vs
either with lliame, or pouertyjor loiTe of children,or fickneHejor o-
ther calamities , which we bcinge vnable to beare in refped of our
felueSjdo byandby finke downe vnder them. Beinge To humbled we
Icarne to call vpon his ftrength, which only maketh vs to ftande vp-
right vnder the heauy burden of afflidions.Yea the moft holy,howe
wcl focuer they know that they ftand by the grace of Go^ & not by
their owne forcejyetare too much afTured of their owrie ftrength &
conftancy,vnles by the triall of the crofTejhe bring them into a more
inward knowledge of themfelues. The flouthfulnefie crept into Da^
I, jo uid : I fayd in my reft, I lliall neuer be motied, Lorde, thou hadft fta-
bhfhed m thy good pleafure a ftrength to my hil,thou hiddeft away
thy face , I was ftriken . For he confefTeth that with fluggifhnefi'e in
profperity his fenles were dulled, that not regardinge the grace of
God, vpon which he fliould haue hanged , he leaned vnto himfclfe,
to promife himfelfc perpetuall continuance. If this chauncedtofo
great a Prophet : which of vs ought not to be fearefull, that we may
be heedefuil? Therefore whereas in profperity they flatter themfel-
ues with opinion of a greater conftancy and patience , when they are
once humbled with aduer{ity,they learne that their former opinion
was buthypocrifie. Thefaithfull(I fay) beinge admonilTiedby liich
examples of their difeafes,do thereby profit to humility,that beinge
vnclothed of the wrongfull confidence of the fl ei"h,they may rcforte
to y grace of God. And where they arc once come to his grace,they
feele the prefence of Gods ftrength , wherin is aboundantly fufticiec
fuccour for them.
3 And this is it that Paul teachethjthat by troubles is engendred
•J* 3* patience,by patience proofe.For wheias God hath promifed y faith-
ful that he will be prefent with the in troubles,they feele the fame to
be true, when they ftand patiently,bein£; vpholde by his hand,which
by their owne ftrength they were not able to do. Patience therefore
bringeth a proufe by experience to y holy oneSjthat God when nede
rcquireth,wil in dcde performe the help that he hath promifed. And
thereby alfo their hope is confirmed : forafmuch as it were too much
vnthankefulnefl'c not to lookc for in time to come,the (arac trueth of
God that they had already by experience proucd to be conftant and
fure.We fee nowe howe many good thinges do come vnto vs in one
knot by the crofle.For,oucrthiowin2; the opinion that we falfly pre-
fume of our owne ftrength, & difclofinge our hypocrifie that deliieth
vs,it ftiakcth away the huttfuU confidence of the UeHijand ccacheth
v$
The grace of Chrift. Lib,3. 286
VS being Co humbled,to reft vpo God only, by which it commeth to
paiFcthac we neither be opprelle^ nor filldowne. And after vidory
followeth hopejinfomuch as the Lord in performing that which he
hath promifcd J ttablilheth the credit of his traeth for time to come,
Truelyjalthough there were no moe reafons butthefc, it appeareth
how much the excrcife of y crolfe is neceffary for vs. For it is a mat-
ter of no fmall importace,to haue the blinde loue of thy felfe wiped
away, that thou maift well know thine owne weakenes.To fele thine
owne weakeneffej that thou maieft learne to diftruft thy felfe : to di-
ftruft thy felfejthat thou maift remone thy confidence from thy felfe
vnto God:to reft with confidence of heart vpon God,that being vp-
holden by his helpjthou maift cotinue vnouercomme to the laft end:
to ftande faft by his grace,that thou maift vnderftand that he is true
in his promifes.'to know by proofe the truth of his promifcs,thatthy
hope may be ftrengthcned thcrby.
4 The Lord hath alfo an other ende of afflidinge his,to trie their
patience, and inftrud vs to obedience. Not that they can vfe any o-
bediece toward him, other than the fame that he giueth them:but fo
it plcafeth him by open examples to make approued by witnelles , &
to fet forth the graces that he hath beftowed vpo his holy ones, that
they Ihould not lie idly hidde within them. And therPore in bringing
forth into open ftiew the ftrength of fuff'rance and conftancy,where-
with he hath furniftied his feruauntes , it is fayd that he trieth their
pacience. And from henfe came thefefayinges:that God tempted A-
braham,& had proofe of his godlincflejby this that he refufed notto Gc.12,
offer vp in facrificc his owne & only fonne.Therfore Peter teacheth,
that our faith is fo proued in troubles , as golde is tried in a fornace: * '^** '
And who can fay that it is not expedient, that the moft noble gift of ^*
pacience, which a faithful! man hath receiued of his Godjfhould be
brought foorth into vre,that it may be made certaincly knowen and
manifeft? For otherwife men will not efteeme it as it is worthy. Now
if God himfelfe doth rightfully whe he miniftreth matter to ftirre vp
the vertues that he hath giuen to his faithfull , that they llioulde not
lie hidden , yea lie vnprofitable and perifliithen is there good reafon
of the afflidions of the holy ones,without which their paciece fliould
be nothing.I fay alfo that by the erode they are inftruded to obedi-
ence,becaufc they are fo taught to liue not after their owne wifh,buc
after the will of God . Truely if all thinges rtioulde flowe vnto them
after their owne minde, they would not know what it were to follow Oe vie
God . And Seneca rehearfeth that this was an olde Pnouerbe, when beats
they exhorted any man to fufFer aduerficicSjFoUowe God By which <^^P' * i
Cap.8. Of the maner how to receiuc
they declared , that then only men truely entred vnder the yoke of
God, whenheyeldcdhis hand andbacketoGodscorredion. Now
jfit be molt righteous, that we (hould (hew our feliies in all thinges
obedient to theheauely father,then we ought not to refufejthat he
Ihould by all meanes accuftome vs to yeld obedience vnto him.
^ 5 Butyct we perceiue not how nccell'iry this obedience is for vs,
vnlcffe we do alfo confider, Iiowe wanton our tiefli is to (hake of the
yoke of Godjfo foone as it hath bin but a liilc while deintily and ten-
derly handeled.The fame happeneth vnto ir,rh3t chaunceth to ftub-
borne horfcs,which if they be a fewe daycs pamprcd idlelyjthey can
not afterward for fcarceneflv* be tamed, neither do know their rider,
to whofe gouernment they foniewhat before obeied. And this is con-
JU.33 tinualinvs that God coplainethrohaue binm the people of Ifraeil,
that beinge well fed and couered with fatncfle , we kicke againft him
that fed and nourilhed vs.The liberality of God Ihould indede haue
allured vs to conlider and louc his goodnefle , but forafmuch as our
cuill nature is fuch , that we are alway corrupted with his tender v-
(age, it is more than necelTary forvs,tobe rcftrayned by (omedi-
fcipline , that we runne not outragiouUy into fuch a ftubborne wan-
tonnefle.So that we (hould not grow Herce with vnmeafurablc abun-
dance ofrichcffejthat we (hould not waxe proud being lifted vp with
honorSjthat we (hould not become infolenc,being puffed vp with o-
ther good gifts,either of the foule,body or tortune,the lord himfclf,
as he forefeeth it to be expedient, preucnteth it,and with the remedy
of the crofle fubducth & bridlcth the fearceneffe of our flefh, & that
diuerfe waycs,fo much as is healthfull for euery man. For all are not
a like ficke of all one difeafes.or do a like neeede of hard healing. And
thereupon is to be fcene howe fome are excrcifed with one kinde of
crolTe , and fome with an other. But whereas the heauenly Phifician
handeleth fome more gently, & purgeth fome with (harper remedies,
when hemeaneth toprouidefor the health of all : Yetheleaueth
none free or vntouched, becaufc he knoweth all without exception
to bed ifc a fed.
6 Moreouer,the moft mcrcifull father neederh not only to preii^t
our weakencflfejbut many times to corred our palTcd offences.Ther-
fore fo oft as we be afflided , the remembrance of our forepaflcd life
ought byandby to entreinto ourminde : fo without doutwelhvill
finde that we haue done fomcwhat worthy of chaftifemcnt. Yet we
ought not chiefcly to grounde our exhortation to patience vpon the
Cof acknowledj^ing of (innc. For the Scripture minil^retlvvs a farre bet-
.1. * tcr confidcration, when it fayth,that the Lord cori:e<fteth vs with ad^
ueritueS|
The grace of Chrift. Lib.g, 287
terfiticSjthat we ihould not be damned with this world.Thcrforc wc
ought euen in the very fharpenes of tnbulatios to ackrtowledge the
kindencs & goodnes of our father toward vs,forafmuch as euen then
he cdfeth not to further our faluation.For he doth affli<51;,not to de-
Ihoy or kill vs , but rather to deliucr vs from the damnation of the
world. That thought {hall leade vs to that, which the Scripture tea-
ch, thin another pbce.'Myfonnejrefule not y Lords corredio, nor prou,;
be weary when thou (halt be rebuked of him. For whom the Lord lo- ii.
ueth, he corredeth, and embraceth him as a father doth his childc.
When we knov/ hii rod to be the rod of a father , is it not our duety
rather ro Oicwe our fclues obedient children and willinge to learnc,
than with obftinacy to do like defperate mcn^that are hardned with
euili doinges ? The Lord lefeth vsjvnlefTc he call vs backe by corre-
6lion when we are falJen away fromhim.fo that the author of the E-
piftle to the Hcbrues rightly fay th that we are batbrds, and not chil- Heb.i 5
dren if we be out ofcorredion. Therfore we are moft fiOward,if we 8.
can not fufter him when he declareth his good will and the care that
he hath for our faluation. This the Scripture reachcth to be the dif-
ference betwcne the vnbeleuers and the faithfull,rhat the vnbeleuers
as the bondfljues of a rooted and hardned wickednes , are made the
worfe & more obftinate with whipping: the faithfuljike'cbildrcn ha^ r
uingan honeft freedome ofnaturc, do thereby pi ofit to repentance.
Now muft thou choofe of whether number thou wilt be.But bccaufc
I haue fpoken of this matter in an otherplace,! am content to couch
it briefcly,and fo will make an end.
7 Morouer it is a fingular comforr, whe wc fufTer perfecution for
righteoufnes.For then we ought to thinke,how great an honor God
vouchefaueth to graunt vs, that he fo garniflicth vs with the peculiar
marke of his fouldiours . I meane that they fufter perfecution for
righteoufnes,not only that fuffer for defenfe of the Gofpdl, but alfo
that arc troubled for any defenfe of rightcoufnes. Whether therfore
inmaintainingethe truethof Godagainfttheliesof Sathan , or in
taking tn hande the defenfe of good men and innocentes a^ainft the
wrongs oFthc wicked, wc be driuen to runne into th c difplcafurc &
hatred of the worlde , whereby our life or goods , or eftimation may
come in daunger : let it not be grieuous or lothfomc vnto vs to em-
ploy our (clues for God , or let vs not thinke our felues miferable in
tho e thines in which he hath with his owne mouth pronounced vs
bhlfed . Pouerty in dede,ifit btconfideredin itfelfc , is miferable: p^jj,j^ -
likewiie bamrhmentjconremprious eftatc,prifonmcnt5{liame;Finally, lo.
death IS the vctermdtofallcalamiues. Bucwhen (he fauour of our
Cap.8, Of the maner how to receiuc
God breatheth vpon vs,there is none of all thefe thinges,but it tur»
neih to our felicity .Therefore let vs rather be content with the tefti-
mony of Chrift, than with the falfe eftimation of the ftefli. So (hall it
come to paflcjthat we fljall reioife as the Apoftlcs did,whe God fhal
accompt vs worthy to fi)fier reproch for his name. For why?If we be-
ing innocent,& knowinj^e our felues cleare in our confciencejare by
the naughty dealinge of wicked men fpoiled of our goods: we are in
dede brought to pouerjy therby among me,but fo richefle ^ truely
grow vnto vs in heauen before God. If we be thruft out of our hou-
[es,we are the more inwardly receiued into the houfbold of God. If
we be vexed & defpifed, wc take fo much the deper rootes in Chrift,
If we be noted with reproches & fhame, we are infomuch the more
honorable place in the kingdom of God.If we be fl lincjfo is the en-
try made open for vs vnto bieffed life. Let vs be afhamed to efteeme
lefle thefe things, vpon which the Lord hath fet fo greate' a price^tha
(hadowifh and fickle enticing pleafures ofprefent life.
8 Sith thcreTore th€ Scripture doth with thefe & hkc admonitios
giue fufficient comfort for the fhames or calamities,that we fuffer for
defenfe of righteoufnes, we are too much vnthankefuU if we do not
gladly and cherefully receiue them at the Loods hande.fpecially fith
this is the kinde of croffcjmoft properly belonginge to the faithfull,
Pe. 4. whereby Chrift will be glorified in vs. As alfo Peter teacheth.But it is
'. more grieuous to gentle natures to fuffer fhame than a hundred
rim 4 deathes.'tl^refore Paul exprcfly admonifheth that we fhall not only
'^ ^ fuffer perfecutionSjbut alfo reprocheSjbecaufe wc trtift in the liuingc
God. As in an other place he leacheth vs after his example to walke
through fclaunder and good reporte. Yet there is not required of v$
fuch a chercfulnes as may take away all feeling of bitternes and for-
row , or elfe the patience of the holy ones in the crofle were no pa*
ciece,vnles they lliould be both tormered with forrow & vexed with
griefe. If there were no hardines in pouerrty,no paine in fickenes,no
griefe in fliame,no horrour in death, what vajiantnes or temperance
were it to beare the indifferently.''But when euery one of thefe doth
with the naturall bitternes therof bite the hearts of vs ali,herin doth
the valiantnes of a faithful man ihew it felfe,if being aflayed with the
feeling of fuch bitternes, how grieuoufly foeuer he be troubled with
it,yet with valiantly refilling he ouercommeth it,his patience vttereth
it felfe herein,tf being fharply prouoked,he is yet fo bridled with the
feare of God, that he burftcth not out into any diftempcr.His chcrc*
fulneffc appeareth hcrin,if being wounded with fadnes and forrow,
herefteth vpon the fpiritual comfort of God.
9 '^^^'5
The grace of Chrift* Lib.j. 288
9 This conflidjwhich the faithfull do fuftaine againft the natural
feeling of forrow, while they ftudy for patience & temperance,Paul i.Cor.i
hath very well defer i bed inthefe words. We are put to diftrefle in all ••
thingSjbut we arc not made forrowfulhwe labour,but we are not left
deftitute : we fuffcr perfection, but we arc not forfaken in if.we arc
throwen downe , but we perifh not.You fee how to beare the crolfe
patientlyjis not to be altogether attoni(hed and without all feehng of
forrowe . As the Stoikcs in olde time did foohiTily defcribe a vahanc
harted manjto be fuch a one as putting of al nature of man, was a hkc
moued in profpcrity and in aduet lity, in forrowfull and ioyfull Itatc,
yea fuch a one as hke aftone was moued with nothinge. And what
haue they profited with this hie wifdomf'Forfooth they hauc painted
out fuch an image of wifdom as neuer was found, & neuer can here-
after be amonge mcniBut rather while they coueted to haue to exa<3
and precifea patience , they haue taken away all the vfc of patience
out of mans life.Andatthisday alfo amogChrirtians there are new
Stoikesjthat recken it a fault not only to grone and wcpe, but alfo ta
be fad and carefull. But thefe ftrange conclufions do commonly pro-
ceede from idle men,which bufying themfelues rather in fpeculatjon
than doing,can do nothing but bredc vs fuch new founde dodrines.
But we haue nothinge to do with that ftony Philofophie> which our
maifter and Lord hath condemned not only by his word but alfo by
his example . For he mourned and wept both at his owne and other
mens aduerfities . The worlde ( fayth he) {hall reioyfe,but you ihal ^^^
mourne and wepe. And becaufe no man fhould finde fault therwith, jo. *
by his open proclamation , he hath pronounced them blefled that
mourne. And no maruell. For if all weping be blamed, what lliall we Mac. 5,
iudge of y Lord himfelfe,out of whofe body dropped bloudy teares,^ 4-
If eucry feare be noted ofinfidchty, what fliall we iudge of that qua- "^***
king feare,wherwith we read that he was not fclcnderly ftriken. If all
fadnes be mifliked,how (hall we hke this,that he confefleth his foule
to be fad euen to the death ?
1 o Tliis I thought good to fpcake to this end,to call godly mindes
from defpeire: that they fhould not therefore altogether forfake the
ftudy of patience,becaufe they can not put of the natural aftcdion of
Ibrrow.-which muft needes happen to them , that make of patience a
fenfelefle dulnes, and of a valiant and conftant man.a ftocke. For the
Scripture giueth to the holy ones the praife of patience, when they
are fo troubled with hardnes of aduerfities, that yet they be not ouer-
come nor throwen downe with itrwhen they be fo pricked with bit-
ternefl"e,that ihey be alfo deliced with fpiriiuall loy: when they be fo
h.2i.
Cap.8. Of the maner how to receiiie
diftrefTedwith griefe, that yet they receiue courage againebeinge
chcared with the comfort of God. Yetinthemeanetime that repu-
gnancy abideth ftiU in their hearteSjthat naturall fcnfe efchueth and
dredeth thofe thinges that it knoweth to be againrt it : but the afFe-
Aion ofgodlines trauaileth euen through all thofe difficulties to the
obeying of Gods wil.This repugnancy the Lord exprei^ed when he
fayd thus to Peter : When thou waft yong tliou didft gird thy [tlic 8c
didft walke whether thou wouldeft : But when thou art old,3n oiher
lliall girde thee and leadc thee whether thou (halt not be wiiiinge.
Is^cither is it likely that Peter,when the time came that he muft glo-
rifie God by his death,was drawen vnwiUingly and reiiftinge vnto ir.
Elfe his martyrdome {liould haue but fmall praife.But howfoeuer he
did with great cherefulnell'e of heait obey the oidinanceof God,
yet becaufe he hadnorputof thenatureof ma,he was doubly ftrai-
ned with two fortes of wils For when he did by hjmfcJfe condder the
bioudy death thathe fhoulde fuffcr, beingeftrickcn with horrour
thereof jhe would gladly haue efcapedit.Ont|^;e other fide ^when it
came in his minde , that he was called vnto it by the comnuunde-
ment of God, then conqueringe and trcadinge dovvne feare, he cJad-
Iy,yea and cherefully tookc it vpon him.Thi^ therefore we muft en-
deuourifwe wiUbe theDifciplesof Chiift, that our mindes be in-
wardly filled with fo great a reuerence & obedience to God, as may
tame and fubdue to his ordiiiaunce all contrary afftdions . So (hall it
come to pafTejthat with wharfoeuer kindc of croffe we be vexed^euc
in the greateft anguiihes of minde, we (hail conftantly kepe patience.
For aduerfities (hall haue their (harpnes, wherwith we Ihalbe bitten:
fo whtnweareafflided withiickeneSjVve flialboth groneand be dif"-
quieted anddefire health : fo bcinge preffed with pouerty ,we flialbc
pricked with the ftings of carefulnes and rorrowifo fliall we be ftnken
with griefe of fhamcjcontcmpt and iniury: fo (hall we yt Idc due tears
to nature at the buriall of our friendes: but this alway fhalbe the co-
clu(ion,Buc the Lorde willed fo. Thci cfore let vs follow his will.Yea
euen in the middeft of the prickings of forow,in the middeft of mour
jiing and teares,this thought muft needes come betwenCjto enchne
our heart to take cherefully the very fame things , by reafon whereof
it is fo moued.
1 1 But forafmuch as wc haue taken the chiefe caufe of bearinge
tl e crolTcout of the conlideration of the will of Godjwe muft in few
wordcs define what difference is betwene Philofophicall & Chriftian
patience . Truely very few of the Philofophers climbed to fo hie a
teafon,to yndcrftand that the hande of God doth exercife vs by affli-
^ions
The grace of Cbrift. Lib.3. iSp
^ionSt& to thinke that God is in this bchalfe to be obeied.But rhey
bring no other rearon5but becaufe we muft Co do of necefTuy .What
is this elleibut to (ay that thou mult yeelde vnio God, becaufe thou
{hair trauail in vainc to wraOlo againft him? For if we obey God, only
becaufe wc fo muft of nccedicyrthe if we might efcape.we would ceflc
to obey. But che Scripture biddeth vs roconliderafarrc other thing
in die will of God,that is to fay,firft luftice and equity, then the care
of our faluation . Thefe therefore be the Chriftian exhortations to
patience, whether pouertyjor banifliment , or prifonmenr, or (hame,
or (ickenelTejOr lofle ofparentes,orcluldren,or any otlicrhke thing
do grieue vs,wc muft ihinke that none of thefe things doth happen,
but by the will and prouidence of God,and that he doth nothing but
by moft luft ordcr:For why^do not our innumerable and daily often-
fes defcrue to be chaftifed more fliarply , & with more grieuous cor-
redion,than fuch as the mercifull kindneffc of God layeth vpon vs ?
Is it not moft great cquity,that our ftefti be tamed,&as it were made
acquainted with the yoke,that flie do not wantonly growe wijde ac-
cordinge to her nature? Is not the righiecufnefTe and trueth of God
worthy, that we fhould take paine for it ? But if there appeare an vn-
doutcd nghtcoufnes in our afflid;ons,we can not without vnrighf e-
oufnes either murmure or wraftle againft it. We hcare not now that
coldc fbngc:We muft giue placc,becaufe we fo muft of neceflity,but
we hcare a liuely leflo & full of eftcduaInes:We rauft obey,becau(c
it is vnlawfuU to refift:we muft fuffcr patiently , becaufe impatience i$
a ftubbornefle againft the righteoufncffc of God. But now , becaufe
that thinge only is worthy to be loued of vs, which we know to be to
our fafety and bcnefit,the good father doth this way alfo comfort v$,
when he affirmeth that euen in this that he afflideth vs with the
crofte , he prouideth for our fafery. But if it be certaine that troubles
are healthfull for vs,why ftiould we not receiue them with a thank-
full and well pleafed minde ? Therefore in patiently fuffering them,
wc do not forceably yccldeto ncceflitie, butquictely agrcto our
owne bcnefite. Thefe thoughtes (I fay) do make that how much our
mindes arc grieucd in the crofle with naturall feelinge of bitrernefTe,
fo much they be chcared with fpirituall gladncfte. Whereupon alfo
followeth thankcfgiuinge , which can not be without ioy. But if the
praifc of the Lord and thankefgiuing procecdeth of nothing but of a
chercfuU and ioy full heart, and there is nothing that ought to inter-
rupt the fame prailing of God and thankefgiuing in vs:hereby appea-
reth howe ncccflary it is that the bititrnffe of the crofte be tcinpere4
with fpirituall iojr. .
GO
Cap. ^. Of the manerhowto receiue
The ix. Chaprer.
of the meditation of the life to come,
BVr with whatfosuer kindc of trouble we be diftrcfled , we muft
alway looke to this ende , to vfe our fclues to the contempt of
this prcfcm life , and thereby be ftirred to the meditation of
the life to come. For, becaufe God knoweth well howc
much we be by nature enclined to the beaftly louc of this worldc,
he vfeth a moft fitic meane to drawe vs backe , and to (hake of our
fluggiflineflc , that we flioulde notfticke too faftin thatloue. There
is none of vs that de|ireth not to fecme to afpirc & endeuour all their
life long to heauenly tmmortality.For we are alhamed to excel brute
bcaftes in nothings : whofe ftate (houlde be nothfnge inferiour to
ours, vnlefle there remayne to vs a hope of eternity after death. But
if you examine the deuifes , ftudies and doinges of euery manne, you
fhall finde nothing therein but earth. Hereupon groweth that fcnfc-
lefnelTe,that our minde beinge dafcled wiih vaine glifteringe of ri-
chefle, power and honors, is fo dulled that it can not fee farre. Our
heart alfo beinge pcflelfed with couetoufnefle, ambition and hift;is fo
weyed downc , that it can not rife vp higher. Finally all our foule en-
tangled with cnticementes of the flc{h, feeketh her felicity inearth.
The Lordjto remedy this euill,doth with continuall examples of mi^
feries teach this of the vanity of this prefent life. Therfore that they
fhoulde not promife themfelues in this life a loonde and^cfaiet peace,
hd fuffcreth them to be many times difcjuieted and troubled either
with warres 5 or vprores, or robberies, or other iniurics. That they
flioulde not with too muchgreedinefle, gape for fraile and traniiro-
ry richeffe , or reft in the richeflfe that they already pofleife , f ome -
time withbanirtiment, fomtime with barrenneife of the earth, fom-
time with fire , fomctime by other meancs he bringeth them to po-
uerty,or at leatt holdeth them in meafure. That they fhould not with
too much eafe take pleafure in the benefitcs of mariagc,he either ma-
kcth them to be vexed with the frowardnes of their wiues,or pluck*
cth them downe wirh ill children, or punilheth them with want of if-
fue. But if in all thefe thinges he tenderly beareth with tbem,yer lenft
they rtiould either fwell with fooliih t'lory^, or inmeafurably reioyfc
with vaincconfiJence , he doth by difeaOs & dangers fct before their
eyes , howe vnftable,and vanifliinge be all the goods that arc fubi«'^
to mortahtyThcn onely therefore we rightly proht in the difciplmc
of the croffe when we learnc iliat this life , when it is confidered in it
felfe,is vnquiet,troublefome and innumerable waycs miferablc, and
in
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 2^0
in no point fully hTcfrecl : & that all ihofe that arc reckened the good
things therof are vnccrraine, fickle, vaine,and corrupted with many
cuils mixed with cbcm. And hereupon we do determine,that here is
nothing Co be fought or hoped for but ftrife:& that when we thinkc
ofourcrovvne, then wemuftlfc vp oureyes toheauen. Forthuswc
inuft bcleue. TJiat our minde is neuer truely raifed to the defire and
meditation of the life to come , vnlcfle it !:aue firft conceiued a con-
tempt of this prefcnt life.
2 For becwene rhefe two there is no meane , the earth muft ei-
ther become vile in our fight , or holde vs bounde with intemperate
loue of it.Threforc if we haue any care of eternity ,we muft d.'hgent-
\y endcuoiir to loiifc our felues from thefe fetters. Now becaufe this
prefentlife hath many flattennge plcafures wherewith to allure vs,a
great Ihcwe of pleifaunineflejgrace, and fwectenefll-jwherewith to
delite vs:it is much bchoueful for vs to be now and then called away,
chat we be not bewitched with fuch allurementes . For what , I pray
you , woulde be done if we did here enioy a conunuall conoourfe of
good things and felicity,fith we can not with contmual fpurres of e-
uils be fufficiently awaked to confider the mifery thereof? Not onely
the learned do know,but alfo the common people haue no Prouerbc
more common than this,that mans life is like a fmokc or fhadow:and
becaufe they fawe it to be a thingc very profitable to beknowen,
they haue fetit out with many notable Icntenccs . But there is no-
thinge that we do either more negligently confider , or leife rcmem*
ber . For we go about all thinges , as though vte would frame to our
felues an immortality in earth. If there be a corps caried to burialljor
if we walke amonge graues, then, becaufe there is an image of death
before our eyes , I graunt we do marueloufly well difcourfe like Phi-
lofophers vpon the vanity of this hfe . Albeit we do not that conti-
nuallyjfor many times all thefe things do nothing moue vs.But when
it happcneth , our Philofophie lafteth but a vvhile,which fo foone as
we turne our backes> vaniflieth away, and leaueth no fteppe at all of
remembrance behind it:finally it parfeth away as a clapping of hands
•vpon a ftagc at any plcafaunt fight . And we for^^ettinge not onely
jdeath , but alfo that we be fubied to death , as though we had neuct
heard any reporte thereof, fall to a careleffe afluredneiTe of earthly
immortality.If any man in the meane time tel vs of the Prouerb, that
man is a creature of a dayes continuancc,we graunt it in deedc : buc
fo heedelefly , that ftill the thought of euerlaftinge continuance rc-
fteih in ourminde.Who therefore candeny,that it is a great profit to
YS all, not only to be admonifhed in wordcs, but by all the examples
00 ij
Cap.^. Of the maner how to rcceiue
ofexperiencethatmay beto beconuinced of the mifcrablc cftaSC
of earthly hfe.-forafmuch as euen whe we are conuinced, we fcarcc-
ly cefle to fland amafcd with pcruerfe and foolifli admiration of ic,a$
though it contained rhevttermoft end of good thingcs. But if it be
neceffary that God inftrud vs , it is our duety hkewife on our behaU
ues to harken to him when he calleth & awakcth our dulneHe, that
Jefpifinge the worlde we may with all our heartes endcuour to the
meditation of the life to come.
g But let the faithful accuftome themfelues to fuch a dcfpifing of
prefcnt life , as may neither engendre a hatred thereof, nor any vn-
thankefulnes toward God.For this lifcjhowfocuer it is fill of infinite
miferies^s yet worthily rcckened among the not fclender bleflingcs
of God. Iherefore if we acknowledge no bcnefite of God in it,wc
are gilty of no fmall vnthankefulnefle toward God himfelfe.But fpe-
cially it ought to be to the faithfuil a teftimonie of Gods good will,
forafmuch as it is wholly dircded to the furtherance of their falua-
tion.For before that he openly deliuer vnto vs the inheritance of c-
ternall glory , his will is to (hew himfelfe a Father vnto vs by fmallcr
cxamplcs;and thcfe be the benefices that are daily beftowcd vpon vs.
Sith therefore this hfe ferueth vs to vnderftandethe goodnefleof
Godjfhali we difdaine it as though it had not a crumme of goodncffe
in It ? We mult therefore put on this feelingc and affedtion.io reckcn
itamonge thegiftesof goodneffe that are not to be rcfufcd. For
though there wanted teftimonies of Scripture , of which there arc
both many and moil euident , very nature it felfe doth exhortc vs to
giue thankes to the Lorde,for that he hath brought vs into the light
of it , that he graunteth vs the vfe of it , that he giueth vs all neccf-
fary fuccours for the prefcruation of it . And this is a much grea-
ter reafon, if we confider that we are in it after a certaine maner pre-
pared to the glory of the heauenly kingdome.For fo the Lorde hath
ordained that they which in time to come ftialbe crowned in heauen,
jnuft fight certaine battels in earth , that they fhoulde not triumphe,
till tlKy had ouercome the hard aduenturcs of the battell,and obtai-
ned the vidory. Then an other reafon is,that we do by diuerfe bene-
fitcs beginne therein to tatte the fweerenefle of Gods liberality , that
our hope and defire fhould be whetted to long for the reucling ihcr-
of. Whe this is determined, that it is a gift of Gods clemency that we
liuc this earthly life,for which as we be bound vnto him,fo we ought
to be mindefull and thankcfuhthen we fliall in fit order come to con-
sider the mott miferable eftate therof,to this end that we may be dc-
liucrcd from too much grcedincire of it , whereunto as I haue before
fa>d.
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. i^i
faydjWe are of our felues naturally endined.
4 Nowe whatfoeuer is taken from the wrongefuU dcfire of this
lifc,ought to be added to the defirc of a better life. I graunt in dede
that they thought truely ,that thought it belt not to be bomc5& the
ncxt,to die cjuickly.For what could they being deftiiute of the light
of God and true reUgion,fee therein but vnhappy & mirerable?And
they did not without reafon , that mourned and wept at the birthcs
of their friendeSj& folemnely reioyfed at their burials, but they did
it without profitjbecaufc beinge without the right dodrine of faith,
they did not fee howc that may turne to good to the godly, which is
of It felfe neither blefled nor to be defired : and fo they ended their
iudecment with defperarion. Let this therefore be the marke of the
faithful in iudging of mortall lifeythat when they vnderftand it to be
of It felfe nothing but mifery,they may re fort wholly the more frefh-
ly and readily to the eternal life to come.When we come to this c5-
parifon, then this prefent life may not onelybe fafelynegleded,
but alfo vtterly defpifed and lothcd in comparifon of thcother.For if
heauenbc our contrey , what is the earth elfe but a place of banifh-
ment?If the departing out of the world be an entring intolife,what is
the world but a graue? to abide in it,what is it elfe but to be drowned
jn deathrif to be dcliuered from the body is to be fet in perfed liber-
ty,what is the body elfe but a prifonPlf to enioy the prefence of God
is the hieft fumme of felicity,is it not mifcrable to lacke ii?But til wc
be efcapcd out of the world, wc wander abroade fro the Lord. Ther- j.Cor-
fore if the earthly life be compared with the heauenly hfe,doutleflc d.
it ought to be defpifed & troden vnder foote.But it is neucr to be ha-
ted.but in refped that it holdeih vs in fubiedion to finne, & yet that
hatred is not properly ro be layd vpon our life. But howfocuer it be,
yet wc muft be fo moued either with wearinefle or hatred of it, that
deliringthe end ofitjwe may be alfo ready at the will of the Lord to
abide in it; fo that our w earines may be farre from al grud gi ng & im»
patience. For it is like a place in battel array, wherein the Lords hath
placed vSjwhicli we ought to kepe till he call vs away.Paule in dcede Rom^J
lamenteth his ftate that he is holden bond in the bondes of the body t4,
longer tha he wiilied, & figheth with feruent defirc of his redcption:
neuertheles to obey the commaundcment of the Lord,he profcfled
himfclf ready to both, becaufe he acknowledgeth himfelf to owe this p|„-j^ ^
vnto God,to glorifie his namct either by death or life:and that it is in % |«
God to determine what is moft expediet for his glory.Therforc if we
muil liue & die to the Lprd,let vs leaue to his will the time of our life
$(. death:buc fo chat we beilill fecucnc in defirc of death,and be con«
00 iij
Cap.p.
Of the maner how to receiuc
tinuallyoccupicd in meditation therofj& defpifc this life incompari-
fon of the immortah:y to come , and wifh to forfakeit when it fiiall
pleafe the Lord bccaufe of the bondage of iinne.
^ But this is m6ftruous.,ihat in ftede of that defire of death,many
that bort: themfelues to beChiiftians,3rc Co afraid of it,that they tre-
ble at euery mention of it, as of a thing betokening vnluckely & vn-
happy . Truely it is no maruell , if naturail fenfc in vs do quake for
fcare when we hcare of the diflbluing of vs.But this is in no wife tole-
rabie, that there be not in a Chriftianmans breft the light of godh-
ncSjthat Hioulde with greater comfort ouercome and fuppreflfe thac
feaie, how great foeuer it be. For if we confiJer that this vnftedfaft,
faulty, corruptible, fraile withering,& rotte tabernacle of our body*
is thcrfore diflolued,y it may afterward be rertored again into a fted-
faft;perfeft,vncorruptible & heauenly glory: fliallnot faith corapell
vs fcruently to defire that which nature feareth ? If we confider that
by death we are called home out of bani{hment,to inhabite our con-
trey, yea a heauenly contreyjflial we obtaine no comfort therby?But
there is nothing that dcfireth not to abide continually. I graunt,and
therefore I afiirme , that we ought to looke vnto the immorfahty to
come,where we may attaine a ftcdfaft ftate that no where appeareth
Cor. in earth. For Paul doth very well teach,that the faithfull ought to go
i cherefully to death.-not becaufe they would be vnclothed,but becaufc
im.8. j^jgy defire to be newly clothed. Shal brute bealleSjyea & liftlts ere-
aturcs,euen ftocks & ilones,knowing their prefent vanityjbe earneflly
bent to looking for the laft d^y of the refurrediojthat they may with
the children of God be dehuered from vanity,& ihsl we that are en-
dued with the light of wir,& aboue wit enlightened with the fpirit of
God,whcn it (tandeth vpon our being.nor lift vp our mindes beyond
this rottennes of earthj? But it pertaineth not to my prefent purpore,
nor to this placejto fpeake againft this peruerfnes. And in the begin-»
nin?. I haue already profefled , that I woulde not here take vpon mc
the large handling of common places. I would counfel fuch fearefull
mindes to read Cyprians booke of MortalityjVnlefTe they were mete
to be fent to the Philofophers,that they may beginnc to be afliamed
when they fee the contempt of death that thofe do fliew. But this let
vs hold for certainely determined , that no man hath well profited in
Chriftes fchoole,but he that doth loyfully looke for the day both of
death & of thelaftrcfurredion.For both Paul deliribeth ally faith-
le t.
i, full by this marke,& alfo it is commof|in the Scripture,to call vs thi-
uk.ij. ther as oft as it wil fet forth a groud ofperfed gladnesReioifc (faith
^ the Lord)& life vp y our heads , for yout icdemp tion commcth ncrc
at
. The grace of Chrift, Lib.3. 2^2
at hand.Is ic realonablc,! pray you,that the thing which he willed to
be of fo great force to raife vp loy & cherefulJnes in vs.fliould brede
nothing but forrow & difcouragemct f" Jf it be fojwhy do we ftil boft
of him as our SchoolemaifterJ'Let vstherforegei a^roundermind,&
howfccuer the bhnde & fcnfelcfle defive of the flefli do ftriue againft
itjlet vs not dout to wifli for the comming of the Lord,not only with
wifhingjbut alfo with groning & fighing,as a thing moft happy of all
oth^r.For he (hall come a rcdemer to vs, to draw vs out of this infinit
gulfe of euils & mircries,and to leade vs into that bit fled inheritance
of his life and glory.
6 This is certainely trucrall the nation of the faithfull/o longe as
they dwel in earth,muft be as fliepe appointed to {laughter,that they ^'J»«'«
may be fafliioned like Chrift their hea^.Therefore they were in moft ^ q^
lamentable cafe, vnleffe they had their minde raifed vp into heaue,& 1 5,1^,
furmounted all that is in the world , and pafled ouer the prefenr face
of things.Contrariwife whc they haue once hfted their heades aboue
all earthly thinges , although they fee the wealth and honors of the
wicked fiorilliingjif they fee the enioyinge quiet peace,if they fee t!-.c
proudein gorgioulnes and fumptuoufnefle of all thingeSjifthey fee
the to flow in plentiful ftore of all delites, befide that if they be fpoi-
led by their wickednefle,if they fuftaine reprochful deahngs at their
pride,ifthey be robbed by their couetoufnes,tfthey be vexed by any
other outrage of theirs;th^"y will eafily vphold themfelues in fuch ad-
uerlities. For that day fhalbe before their eies,whcn the Lorde fhall Efj, j j,
rcceiue his faithful! into the quiet oVhis kingdom, when he (hal wipe 18.
alltearcs from their eies,vvhen he fhall clothe them with the robe of ^^"*'7»
glory & gladneSjwhen he fliall feede the with y vnfpeakeable fwete- '^*
nefleofhisdcintieSjwhen he fliall aduance them to thefellowfliippc
of his hie eftate : finally when he fliall vouchfaue to enterparten his
felicity with them. But thefe wicked once that haue floriflied in the
earth, he fhall throw into extreme fliame,he fliall change their delitef
into tormentes , their laughing and mirth into wcping and gnafliing
of teeth,hc fliall dilquiet their peace with terrible torment of confci*
cnce,he fliall punifli their deintinefle with vnquenchable fier,& fhall
put their heades in fubiedio to ihofe godly mejvvhofe patience they
haue abufed.For this i<f righrcoufneflc(as Paule te{tifieth)to giuc re- i.The»i
Icafe to the miferable & to them that are vniufl:ly afflidcd,& to ren- 6,
derafflidiontothe wicked that do afflid the godly , when the Lorde
leftis Ihal be reuealed from heauen.This truely is our onely comfort,
which ifit be taken away,we muft of neciflity either defpeir, or flat-
ttringeiy delitc our felues with the vaync comfortes of the worldc to
- 00 iiij
Cap.i o. Of the maner how to receiuc
HHjS' our owne deftrudion. For eiicn the prophet confeffcth that his fcetc
ftagged,when he tailed too long vpon conh'deringe the prcfentpro-
fpcrity of the wicked;and that he could not othcrwife ftandc ftedfaft,
but when he enrred into the fanduary of God , and bended his cics
to the laft end of the godly & the wicked.To conclude in one word,
then only the croffc of Chrift triumpheth in the hearts of the faith-
full vpon the Deuill, fle(h,finne & the wickcd,when our eyes are tur-
ned to the power of the refurredion. *
The X. Chapter*
How we ought to vfi thu preftnt Itfe, and the helps thereof.
BY fuch incrodudions the Scripture dothalfo well informe vs
what is the riglit vfe of earthly benefites : which is a ihinge
not to be neglcded in framing an order of life. For if we muft
bue,we muft alfo vfe the neceffary helpcsof hfe : neither can
we efchue euen thofe things that feeme rather to ferue for delite than
for neceHity. Therefore we muft kccpe a meafure , that we may vfe
them with a pure confcicnce,eithcr for neceffity or for delight. That
nwafure the Lordc appoinieth by his worde, when he teacheih that
this life is to them that be his , a certaine lorney through a ftraungc
countrey, by which they trauailc towarde the kingdome of heauen.
If we muft but pafle through the earth , doutleffe we ought fo farrc
to vfe the good thinges of the earth, as they may rather further than
hinder our iourney. Thcrfore Paul doth not vnprofitably counfcll v$
fo to vfe this worldc, as though we vfed it not:and to bye pofllflions
with fuch a minde as they vfe to be folde . But becaufc this place i$
flippery,and fo flope on both fides, that it quickcly maketh vs to fall,
let vs labour to faften our foote there, where we mayftande&fely.
For there haue bin fomejthat otherwife were good and holy menne,
which when they fawe intemperance and ryot continually to range
with vnbridled luftjVnlefle it be fharply reftrained,& were defirous to
corred fo great a mifchiefjthey could find none other way,bur fufBed
ma to vfe the benefites of the earth,fo far as necefllty required.This
was in dede a Godly counfell,but they were to fcuerc.For(which is a
very perillous thinge)thcy did put ftrcighter bondes vpon confcien-
ces,than thofe wherewith they were bound by the word of God. And
they expoundc ncccflity , to abftaine from all thinges which a man
may be without.And fo by their opini6,a ma might fcarccly take any
more foode than bread & water. And fome be yet more feuere:as it is
red of Crates the Thcbanc , that did throw c liis goods into the Ce9»
becaule
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j, 2^3
becaufe if they were not deftroyed , he thought that he flioulde be
deftioyedby them. Many at this djy, while they leekc apictencr,
whereby the intemperance ot the flefh in vfe of outwarde thinges
may be excufed , and while they go about to prepare a way for the
ficlh raging in wantonnes, do take that as a thing contelled, which I
do not graunte them , that this hberue is not to be rcftramed with
any hmitation of meafure,but that it is to be left to euery mans con-
fcience to vfe as much as he fecih to be lawfull for him. Truly I con-
feflcjthat cor.fciences neither ought nor can in this point be boundc
by certaine and precife formes of lawes.But for as much as the Scrip-
ture teacheth generall rulesoflawfull vfe, wemuft furcly mcafurc
the vfe accordmg to ihcfc rules.
2 Let this be a principle : that the vfe of Gods giftes fwarueth
not out of the way, when it is referred to that endc, whereunto the
authour him felfe hath created and apointcd them for vs,for as much
as he hath created them for our good and not for our hurt. There-
fore no man can kepe a righier way,than he that (hall diligently iokc
vnto this endc. Nowe if we confider to what ende he hath created
meateSjWc lliall findc chat he meant to make prouifion not oncly for
neccllirie but alfo for dchte and pleafurc. So in apparcll , befide ne-
ceflitie he apointed an other ende, which is comlinefle and honeftie.
In herbes , trees , and fi utes , befide diuerfe profitable vfes, there is
alfo a plcafantnelfe of light, and fwetenefle of fmell.For if this were
not true,the Prophet would not recken among the benefites of God P^ lOf.
that wine maketh glad the hcartof man, and that oyle make th his '^*
face to {hine : the Scripture would not echewhere , to fei fourth his
liberalitie , rchearfe that he hath geuen all fuch things to men. And
the very naturall qualities of things do fufficiently ihew,to what endc
and how far we may vfe them. Shall the Lord haue fet in floures (b
^rcat a beutie,as prefenteth it fclfe to our eyes : fl^all he hane geuen
fo great a fwetenes of fauour as naturally floweth into our fmelling:
and fhall it be vnlawfull either for our eyes to take the vfe of that
beautie, or for our fmelling to fecle that fwetencfle of fauour ? what?
Hath he not fo made difference of colours , that he hath made fome
more acceptable than other } what? Haih he not geuen to gold and
^luer, to luorie and marble, a fpeciall grace whereby they might be
made more precious than other metalles o^ ftones ? Finally hath he
not made many things commendable vnto y.s without ncceflary vfe? i
J Therefore away with that vnnaturall Pbilofophie, which in
graunting vs of the creatures no vfe but for necefliue,not onely doth
niggardly bcp'ic vs of the lawfuil vfe of Gods hbcrahtie,but alfo can
Cap.io. Ofthemancrhowtoreceiuc
^ nottake place, vnlf fit: jtfirft hauc fpoiled manof all hisfenfcsand
niadc him a blocke.Buc on the other fide we muft with no lefle dili-
gence prouide a ft ay for y luft of the flefli, which if it be not brought
into order, ouerfloweth without mcafure.and it hath (as I haue faid)
defenders of it , which vfider pretenfe of allowed libertie do graunc
vnio it all thinges. Firft there is one bridle put in the mouth of it , if
this be determinedjthat all things are created for vs to this ende,that
we fhould know the authour of them , and geue hitn thankes for his
tender kindnefl'e toward vs. Where is thythankesgcuing,if thoufo
gluttonoufly fill thy felfe with deinty meates or with wine, t'lat thou
cither be made fcnfleire , or vnfit to do the dunes of godlineffe and
of thy calling*' Where is the rcknowledging of God,if thy flefli by to
great abundance boiling in filthy luft,doth with her vncleannefTe in-
fedc thy minde , that rhou canlt not fee any thinge rhat is right or
honeft ? In apparcU , where is thankefulncfle to God , if with coftly
gorgjoufneflc thereof we both fall in admiration of our feluesand
difdaine other ? jf with the tnmneflc and cReanlinefiTe of it , we pre-
pare our felues to vnchafl:itie?Whtrcis thereknowledgingof God,
if our minde be fixed vpon the gaintfle of our apparell > For many fo
geue all their fenfes to bodely dchtes.that the minde licth ouerwhel-
med Many are fo delited with marble, gold,and paintings, that they
become as it were mennemadcof marble, that they bee as it werd
turned into mctaJies, andbeehke vnto painted Images. The fmellc
of the kitchen,or fwetencfle of fauour fo duileth fomcjthat they can
fmell nothing that is fpirituall. And the fame is alfo to be feen in the
reft.Therfore it is certaine that hereby the licencioufnefle of abufing
"Rom.1 3 is fomewhat reilrained,and that rule of Paule confirmed, that we be
i-f. not to careful! of the flelh,for the luftes therof,to which if we graunt
to muchjthey boile out aboue meafure and temper.
4 But there is no furer nor rcdier way than that which is made vs
by the contempt of this prerentlife,and the meditation of heaucnly
immortalitie.For thervpon follow two I ules:the one,that they which
vfc this world . fliould be Co minded as though they vfcd it not , they
that mary wiues as though they did not mary : they y bye as thou.'h
I. Cor. they did not bye , as Paule teacheth. The other , that they fliould
7'i' Icarne as well to beare pouertie,quietly and patiently, as abundance
moderatly. He that biddeth thee to vfe this world as though thou
didft not vfe it , doth cut away not onely the intemperance of glut«p
tonie in meat and drinke , and to much deintinefl'e, fumptuofnefle,
pride,hautineire,and nicenefic,in fare,bilding, and apparell, but alfo
ail care and affciSion that may either withdrawe thee or hinder the«
froqi
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 294
from thinking of til e hcauenly lifCjO' from ftudy to garnifh thy foule.
B^it this was long ago truely faid of Cato : that there is great carc-
fulneifeof trimmins our body, and ere.it careldh Ifcof vertue. And
it is an oldcprouerbe that they which arc much bufic;d in care of
their body are commoly carelefie ot their l"oule.Therek>re,ahhough
the hbertie of the faithfull in outward thinos is nor to be reftramed
toa certain formCjyet truly it muft be lubieit to this lawjto beare very
httle with their owne affedions, butcontrariwife ftiUcallvpon them
fclues with continually bent minde , to cut of ail ihew of fuperfluous
plentie,much more torcftraine ryotcus excefle,and to take diligent
liede,that they donotofhelpesmake to them fclues hindcraunces.
5; The other rule lhalbe,that they that haue but fmall and fden-
derrichefle.niaylearnc tolacke paiiently, that they be not carefully
moued with immeafurable delire of them:which paciece they that
kcpe,haue not a lule prolited in the Lords fcholeras he that hath not
at leaft fomcwhat profited in this behalf, can fcarcely haue any thing
whereby to proue him felfcthe fcholar of ChiriiForbefide this that
the molt part of other vices doaccompanie the defire of earthly
thnit^eSjlie that beareth pouertie impatiently, doth for the moft part
bewray the contrarie difeafe in abundance. I meane hereby that he
which wilbeafliamcdof a pooie cote,wilbeproudcof a coftly cote:
he thit will not be content with a hungry fupper , will be difquicted
with dcfire of a deintier , and would alfo intcmperately abufe thofc
deintics if he had them : he that hardly and vnquietly beareth a pri-
uate and bafe i doite, will not»abfteine from pride if he climbe to ho-
nors. Therefore let all them that hnue an vnfaincd zele of Godli- P^|'^4«
neflejCndcuour to learne by the ApolUes example,to be ful'and hun- ' **
gry,«:o haue ftore & fuffer want. The Scripture hath alfo a third rule,
whereby it tempcreth the vfe of earthly things , of which we haue
fpoken fomewhat when we entreated of the preceptes ofcharitie.
For the Scripture decreeth that all earthly things are fo geuen vs by
the bounnfulneffe of God, and appointed for our commoditic, that
they may be as things dcliuercd vs to kepe, wherof we muft one day
yeelde sn accompt. We muft therfore fo difpofe the,ihat this faying
may cotinually found in our cares,yeld an accompt of thy bailiwike.
/Therewithal! let this alfo come in our minde. Who it is that af kcth
filch an accompt, eucn he that hath fo much commended abftincce,
robrietie,honeft fparing,and modcftie, and abhorreth riotous fump-
tuoufneffejpride.oftetation and vanitie,which allowcth no other dif-
pofing of goodes , but fuch as is ioined with charitic : which hath
already with his owne mouth condemned all thofe deliccfull things
Cap.io. Of the maner how to recciuc
that do withdrawc a mans minde from chaftitie and cleanneiTe ,or
do dull his wit with darkenefl'e.
6 Laft of all,this is to be noted,that the Lord biddeth eucry one
of vs in all the doinges of his hfe , to haue an eye to his calling. For
he knowcth with how great vnquietnefle mans wit boileth,with how
( kipping lightnefle it is caried hether and thcther , howe gredy his
ambition is to holde diuerfe things at ones. Therforc that ail things
{hould not be confounded with our follie and raihenefle , he hath
apointed to eueric man his duties in feuerall kindcs of life. And thac
no man rafhiy runne beyond his bondes.he hath named all fuch kin*
des of lyfe, vocations. Therefore euery mans feuerall kindc of life is
vnto him as it wci^e his ftanding apointed him by God , that they
(hould not all their life vncertainly wander about. And this diuiiion
is (o neccfTary , that all our doings are meafured thereby in his fight,
and oftentimes contrary to the iudgement of mans reafon and Phi*
lofophie. There is no deede accomptcdmore noble,euen among the
PhilofopherSjthan for a man to deliuer his conirie from tyrannic:but
by the voice of Gods iudgement the priuatc man is openly condcm^'
ncd that layeth hand vpon a tyrant.But I will not tarry vpon rehear-
ing of examples, It is fufficient if we knowe that the calling of fhe
Lorde is in euery thing the beginning and fundation of well doing:
to which he that doth not direct himfelfc , fhall ncuer kepe a rigne
way in his doinges . He may paraducnture fometime do lomewhat
feming worthy of praife : but whatfoeuer that be in the fight of men,
before the throne of God it ihalbe reieded ; morcoucr there (halbe
no conuenient agrement in the partes of his hfe . Therefore our life
ihall then be belt framed,when it Ihalbe direded to this markc : For
then,no man caried with his owne raftineffe will attempt more than
his calling may beare , becaufe heknoweththatitis no: lawefullto
pafle beyond his bondcs. He that Ihalbe a man of bafe eftate , fhall
contentedly liuea priuatelifejleaftheflioulde forfikethe degree
wherein God hath placed him. Agair^e this (halbe no fmallrelefe to
carcSjlaboi s,grcues,and other burdens, when a man Hiall know that
in all thefc things , God is his guide. The more willingly the magi-
ftrate will execute his office:the houfholder will bind him felfe to his
dutie: euery man in his kindeofhfc will beare and pafle through ^
the difcommodities,cares,tedioufnc(re, and anguifhes thereof: when
they are perfwaded that euery mans burde is laid vpon him by God.
Hcrcvpon alfo fhall growe (lingular comfort , for as much as there
fhalbc no worke (6 filthy and vile, ( if it\be fuch a one as thou obey
thy calling in it)but it (liincth & is moft precious in the fight of God.
Tb«
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3 , 2^5
The xj. Chapter.
of the m^iftcatien of Faith , andfirfi of the iefnit'ton oftbe
name and of the thing.
IThinkc I hauc already fufficicntly declared before , howe there
remaineth for men being accurfedby the iawc one cnely hcipe
to recouer faluation : againe,what Faith is,and what benefices of
God it beftoweth vpon man , and what fruites it bringeth fourth
in him. The fumme of all was this,that Chrift is gcue vs by the good*
nefle of God, and concciued and pofTelTed of vs by faith , by parta-
king ofwhomcwe receiue principally twoo graces ;thefirft,thac
being reconciled to God by his innocencie,we may oo we ii> ftede of
a iudge hauc a merciful! father in heauen : the fecond , that bang
Tandified by his Spirit , we may gcue our fclues to innoccncic and
pureneflc of life. As for regeneration, which is the fecond grace, wc
haue already fpoken of it as much as femcd to be fufficient . The
manner of iuftification was therefore Icfle touched,becaufe it ferued
well for our purpofe , firft to vnderftande both how the Faith by
which alone we receiue frely gcuen righccoufneffe by the mercic of
God,is not idle from good workes ; & alfo what be the good workcs
of the holy onej,wherevpon part of this queftion entrtateth.There-
fore they are firft to be throughly difcuffcd^ and fo difcuffed that wc
muft remembre that this is the chiefc ftay of vpholding religi6,that
we may be the more carefiill and hedcfull about it. For vnlefl'e chou
firft knowe,in what ftate thou art with God,and what his ludgcment
is of thee : as thou haft no ground to ftabliftic thy faluation , fo haft
thou alfo none to raifc thy reueret feare toward God. Btit the necef'
fitic of this knowledge ftiall better appere by knowledge it fclfc.
X But that we ftumble not at the firft cntric, (which we fliould do
if we ihould entrc difputation of a thing vnknowen) let vs firft de-
clare what is meant by thefe fpeches,Man to be iuftified before God,
To be iuftified by ftith or by v/orkes. He is faid to be iuftified afore
God, that is pronounced by the iudgemcntof God bothiuft and
^accepted for his owne righteoufnefle fake . For as wickednefle is
abhominable before God,fo afinner can not finde fauour in his
eyesjin refpcd that he is a finner, or fo long as he js aecomptedfuch
a one.Therfore whcrefoeuer finne is, there alfo appeicth the wrath
and vengeance of God.He is iuftified that is notaccompted in place
of a finner but of a iuft man, nnd by reafon thereof he ftandethfaft
before the iuds?ement featc of God when all fmners fall. A« if an in-
' noeet be brought to be acaincd before the feate of a righccoas iud^e^
Gap.i I . Of the maner how to receiue
when iudgement is gcuen accoidinge to his innocencie , he is faicfe
to be iuftificd before theiudge: fo he is iuftificd before God that
being exempt out of the number of finncrs hath God a witnefle and
affirmer of his righteoufneflfe.Therfore after the fame manner a man
Ihalbe faid to be iuftified by workes , in whofe hfe there is founds
fttch cleanneile and holynefle, as maydcferue the tcftimonie of
righteoufneffc before y throne of God ; or he that with the vpright-
nes of bis workes is able to aunfwcre and fatisfie Gods iudgement.
Cotrariwife he fhalbe faid to be iuftihed by faith thar being excluded
from the righteoufnefle of workes , doth ky faith take holde of the
righteoufnes of Chrift.-wherewirh when he is clo:hed,he appeareth
in the light God, not as afinner, but as righteous. So we (imply ex-
pound iuftification to be an acceptation , whereby God receiuing vs
into fauour taketh vs for righteous. And we fay that rhe fame con-
iifteth in forgeueneffe of(innes,and imputation of ihe righteouf-
jielTeofChrift.
g For confirmation hereof there are many and euident teftimo-
nics of Scripture.Firft it can not be denied,that this is the proper and
moft vCed fignificati5 ofthe word. But becaufe it is too long to gather
all the places and compare them together, it (halbe enough to put
the readers in minde of them , for they may of them feiues calcly
marke them.But I will bring fourth fome, where this iuftification that
Inc. 7. we fpeake of isexprcfleiy entreated of byname, Fiift where Luke
>«• fayeth that the people when they had heard Chrift did iuflifie God.
UC.7. ^^j where Chriit pronounceth that wifdome is iuftificd by her chil-
dren : he doth not m cane there , that they do gcue righteoufnefle,
which alway rcmaineth perfed with God,aIt hough all the world go
about to take it away from him: nor in this place alfo to make the
dodrine of faluation righteous , which hath eucr that of it fdfe. But
both thefe fpeches are as much in cffed , as to geue to God and his
dodnne the praife that they deferue. Againe whe Chrift reprocheth
Luc, 17. the Pharifecs, that they iuilifie them fclues, he doth not meane that
*^* they obccine righteoufnefle by well doing, but do vaineelorioufly
frke for the fame of rightcoufneflTcjwhereof in dcedc they be voide.
They that are fkilfull ofthe Hebrue tongue do better vnderftande
the fenfeof this phrafe^in which tongue they are not oncly called
wicked doers.that are gilty in their confcience of any wicked doing,
but alfo they that come in daunger of iudgement of condemnation.
i.Reo. , For when Berlabe fayeth that flie and Solomon flialbe wicked doers,
ai. ftie doth not therein acknowledge any cft'enfe,but complaineth that
(he and her fon flialbe put 10 fliamc , to be numbred among the t e-
probacc
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 1^6
probate and condemned.Buc by the procefle of the text it cafely ap-
peareth , that the fame worde in Latinc alio , can not otherwifc be
taken but by way of relation , and not to fignific any quahtie. But as
concernint^ the matter that we are nowe in hande with; where Paulc
faith that the Scripture did forfee,that God iuflifieth the Gentiles by Gal. j.g
faith, what may a man vnderftande thereby , but that God doth im- ^**°™' !•
pute rightcoufnefle by faith? Againe,when he faith that God lufti* * *
Heth the wicked man that is of the faith of Chrift, what meaning can
be thereof,but by the benefit of faith to dcliuer them from the dam-
n.?tion which their wickedncfledcferued? And yethefpeaketh more
pl.uncly in the coni.lu(jon,whcn he cried out thus. Who ihali accufc
Gods eied? It is God that iuft.Hcth, who ihall condcmne? It is Chrift Rom, js,
that died, yea that lofeagaine, arid nowc makerh incerct (lion for vs^ J J*
It is as much in efFcd as if he fliould (ay jWhoiliall accufc them
whome God acquitcth/ who ihall condemhe them whofc patronc
Chrift IS and dcfendeth them ? To iuftifie therefore is nothing els,
than to acquitc him that was accufcd,from gilttnclfe as allowmgc
his innocencie Sith therefore God doth luftifie vs by the interctilion
of Chrift , he doth acquitc vs , not by allowance of our ownc mno-
ccncy,biit by imputation of righteoufnrlfe.that we may becompted
for righteous in Chrift,which are not righteous in our fclucs. So in
the. i J. Chapter of the A<fies,in Paules (cimoniby hiinis forgeucncs Aa,ij«
of finnes preached vnto you, and eucry one that bcleuethin himis ^^ •
luftiHed from all thofe thmgs , from which you could noi be luftified
in the lawe of Mofes. You lee that after foi geueneifc of linnes. iufti-
fication is added in place of an expoliiion. You fee plainely that it is
taken for abfolution , you fe that it is taken away from tlie workes of
the lawe you fee that it is the mere beneficiallgift of Chnif, vou fee
that it is rcceiuedby faith. Finally you fee th.-t there is a fan^fadion
fpoken of where he fayeth that wc are iuftiticd from (innes by Ciirift.
So when it is faid that the Publicane came lultified out of the Tcm- Luc 18^
ple,we can not fay that he obteined nghteoufnelfe by any deferuing '4«
of workes. This therefore isfaidethat after pardon of his linius
obteined.he was compted for righteous before God. He was iherc-s
fore righteous, not by approuinge of workes, but by Gods free ab-
folution. Wherefore Ambrofe fayeth very well, that callcth the con- Tn Pfal,
fciTion of (innes a lawefull luftification. « 8.
, 4 But to leaue ftriuing about the wordrif we loke vpon the thing '^'^""^
if fclfc as it IS defcnbed vnto vs,rhcrc ihall rcmainc no more doubte.
For truely Pauledoth exprelfe iuftification by the name of accep-
tation , when he faith ( Ephif.i.a. 5.) wc are apomtcd vnto adoptioxj
Cap.i I . Of the mancr how to rcceiuc
by Chrift,according to y good pleafure of God,vnto che praifcofhif
Rom. J. glorious fauour,whereby he hath accompted vs acceptable or m h-
14. uour. For the fame is meant by it that is faide in an other place , that
Rom. 4- God doth frely iuftifie. In the 4. Chapter to theRomaincs,hefirft
• :«allctb it an imputation of nghtcoufneflcjand flickcih not to fay that
it confifteth in forgeuenclfc of linne«.That man (faid he) is called of
' Dauid a blcfled man , to whom Goc{ accoptech or imputeih righic-
oufneffe without woi kcs , as it is written : Bkflcd arc they whofc ini-
quiries are forgcuen.&c. Truely he there doth entr<^ ate not of one
part of iuftification , but ofalliuftjfication wholly- And heteftifieth
that Dauid in that place maketh a definition of iuftification,when he
pronounceth that they are blcfTcdto whom isgeuen free forgeoe-
fieffe of finnes. Whereby appereth that this righteoufnefle whereof
he fpcaketh ) is in comparifon (imply fet as contrary to giltinefie.
But for this purpofe, that is y beft place where he teacheth, that this
is the fumme of the meflage of the Gofpell,that we Ihould be recon-
ciled to God : becaufe it is his will to receiue vs into fauour through
j.Cor 5 Chril^, in not imputing (innej* vnto vSi Let the reders dihgently wey
18. all the whole proceflfe of the text. For by & by after,where he addeth
byway of expo(ition,that Chrift which was without finnc was made
(innc for vs, to expreflfe the manner of reconciliation , doubtlefTe he
Rom.5. meaneth nothing ds by the word rccocilingbutiuftifying.And that
i5>. which he faith in an other place, that wc are mode righteous by the
obedience of Chri{t,could not ftand logetherjVnlefTe we be accomp-
ted righteous before God,in him^nd without our felucs.
$ But where as Ofiander hath brought in, I wotc not what mon-
ftcr of elfentiall nghteoufncs, whereby, although his will was not ta
deftioy free righteoufnes , yet he hath wrapped ir within fuch a nriift,
as darkeneth iodly minde$,& bereueth them of the earneft feling of
the grace of Chrift: therefore ere I pafTe further to other thingesjtt is
worthy labour to cofute this doting errour.Firft this fpcculatio is but
of mere & hungry curiofitie.He doth in deede hcape together many
tcftimonics of Scripture, to prouc that Chrift is one with vs, and wc
one with him, which nedeth no profe* but becaufe he kepethnot
ihisbondcofvnitie,hefnareth himfelfc. Butwc which holde that
we are made all one with Chrift by the power of his !Spirit,may cafi-
ly vndo all his knottes.He had conceiued a ccrtaine thing very ncarc
to the opinion of Manichees ,to defire to conucy the fubftance of
God into mcn.Hcrevpon nfeth an other inuention of his that Adam
wasfaOnoned after the Image of God , becaufe euen before the fall
Chrift was ordained the paterae of the nature of man. But bycaufe I
would
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j. 2^7
would be fliortCjl wjU tarry vpon the matter that 1 haue prcfcntly in
hande.Hc faith that we are one with Chrifi.Wa graunt.But we ticnic
that the fubftancc of Chrift is mingled with oures. Morcouer we f^y
that this principle that Chrift is righteoufnefie to v$,becaufc he is an
etcrnall God,the foumaine of rightcoufnefle & the very felfc rightc-
oufneire of God, is \vi ongfiilly drawcn to dcfcnde his deceites. 'J he
jreaders ftiall pardon me , if I do iiowe but touche thefe thinges that
the ordre of teaching reqiiireth to be diftcrred into an other place.
But although he cxcufc himfelfe from meaning nothing els by the
name of eflentiall righteoufhcfle , but to rcfift this opinion that we
are accompted righteous for Chriftes lake :yet he plainly exprefltth
that he is not contented with that nghteoufnes that is purchaied for
vs by the obedience and Sacrifice of Chrift , but faineth that we arc
fubftatially righteous in God,as well by fubftace as by quality poured
into vs.For this is the reafon why he (o earncflJy affirmeth , that not
only Chriftjbut alfo y father & the holy Ghoft do dwell in vs.VV hich
although I graunt to be true.yet I fay that he wrongfully tvrcftcth it.
For he fhould haue confidered the manner of dwelhngjthat is, that
the father and the holy Ghoft are in Chrift,3nd as the fulncilc ot the
Godhead dwclleth in him , fo do we pollefl'e whole God m him.
Therfore all that he faith fcucrally of the father & the holy Ghoft,
tedcth to no other endc but to draw y (imple from Chrift. And ihea
he thrufteth in a mixture of fubftances, whereby God pouring him-
felfe into vSjdoth make vs as it were a part of hirnfelte J^or he rccke-
ncth it almoft a matter of nothingjthat it is wrought by the power o^
the holy Ghoft, that we grow into one with Chrift, & that he is our
headc & we his membres, vnleflc 1 is rery fubftace be mingled with
vs. But in the father & the holy Ghoft (as I haue faid) he doth more
openly bewray what he thinketh,euen this,that we be iuftjHed not by
the only grace of the Mediator,and that righteoulhcire is not fimply
or perfe<f^ly offered vs in his perfone, but that we are made partaicis
of the righteoufnes of God,whe God is eflentially made one with v«.
6 If he did fay no«nore, but that Chrift in iuftifying vs, is by ef-
fentiall conioining made oures : and that not onely he is our headc,
in that he is marme , but alfo that the fubftance of the diuine nature
is powred into rs.He fhould with lefte hurte feedc him felfc deintily,
and paraduenture fo great a contention ftiould not haue bene laifcd
for this doubtinge errour . But fith this beginning is like a cuttle that
with carting out of blackc and thicke bloode hideth her many tailcs,
we muft needes earneftly relifte vnleflc we will wittingly & willinge-
ly f«ft'cr that riohtcou/nciTc to be taken from vs, which only bringctk
PP
Cap. I T . (^f the maner how to recciuc
vs couhderice to glory of faluation.For in all this difcourfcthe name
oFrighceoufneffe , and this worde iuftifying , extende to two partes:
that to be iuftified is not onely to be reconciled to God with free
pardon, but alfo to be made righteous, that rrghteoufnes is not a free
imputation but a holinefle and vprighinefie^ which the fubftance of
God remaining in vs doth breath into vs . Then he ftoutly denieth,
th H Chrift IS our righteot^fneife in refped that being a prieft he did
with fatisfadorjly purging (innes appeafe his father towarde vs, but
inrefpeclthatheis eiernall God and life. To proue that firft point,
^hat God doth iuftifie not onely by forgeuing but alfo by regenera*
ting,he afketh whether God doth leaue them whom he doth iufti-
fie fuch as they were by nature,chaunging nothing of their viccs.Thc
aunfwere hereof is very cafy:that as Chrift can not be tome in partes
fo thefe two things which we together and iointly receive in him,
rhat IS to fay righteoufiieffe an<f fandification,are infeparable.Tber-
fore,whonrv(oeuer God reeeiueth into fauour>he doth alfo therwith-
all gcue themthcfpintofadoption,by the power whereof he newly
fafliioneth them after hh image. But if the brightnefleof chefunnc
can not be feuered from the heate thereof ,fhaU we therefore fay
ihaf the earth is warmed with the light, and enlightened with the
hcate? There is nothing more fit for this purpofe,than this fimilitudc
The funne with his heate geuethhfeand frutefulneffe to the earth,
with his beames he geueth light and brightneffe. Here is a mutuall
and vnfeparable conjoining : yet reafon forbiddeth to conucy to the
one th^t which is peculiar to the other.Like abfurditie is in this con-
fufion of two fortes of graces,that Ofiander thrufteth in.For becaufc
God doth in deede renew them to the obferuing of righteoufnefle
whom he freely accomptecii for righteous, therefore Ofiander con-
fouiidech that gifr of regeneration with this free acceptation,and af-
firmeth that they beal one and the felfefame thing.But the Scripture
ioJnin J them both togethcr,yet doth diftindly recken them,that the
manifold grace of God may y better appere vnto vs. For that faying .
of Paule is not fuperfluouSjthat Chrift was gcienvs vnto righteouf-
nefle and fandification. And whenfocucrhereafonethtoproue by
the faluationpurchaccdforvsby the fatherly loue of God, and by
the grace of Chrift, that we are called to holinefte and cleannefle, he
plamely declarcth that ir is one thin? to be iuflified and an other to be
made newe creatures. But when Ofiander cometh to the Scripture,
he corrupreth as many places as he allcgeth. Where Paule faith that
faitli is accompred for righteoufnefle to him tha^worketh not , but
beUucth in him that iulhfieth the wicked man , he expoundeth it to
make
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3, 2^8
make righteous. With like rafhnefle , he depraueth all the fourth
Chapter to the Rdmaihs , andftickcth not with like falfe colour to Rom. 4
corrupt that place which I euennow alleged, Who fliall accufe the 5.
cicdes of (3od ? it is God that iuftifieih : where it is plaine that he
(peaketh fimply of giltinefle and acquiting,& the meaning of the
Apoftle hangeih vpon a comparing of cotrarics. Therfore Ofiandcr
is found too fond a babbler, as well in that rcafon as in alleging the
teftimonies of Scripture. And no more rightly doth he fpeake of the
name of righteoufiiefle,in faying that faith was accompted to Abra-
ham for righteoufnelfe , after that embracing Chrift ( which is the
righteoufnefie of God and God him felfe) he excelled in fingular
vertueSj whereby appereth that of two whole places he hath wrong-
fully made one corrupt place. For the righteonfnes that is there men-
tioned,perteineth not to the whole courfe of his calling : but rather
the holy Ghoft teftifieth,th2t although the vertues of Abraham were
(ingularly excellenr,and that with long continuance he at length had
cncreafed them : yet he did no other way pleafe God , but by this,
that he receiued by faith t'le grace offered in the promife. Where-
vpon followeth , that in iufiificaiion there is no place for workes , as
Paule very well affirmeth .
7 As for this that Ofiander obieifleth , that the power of iufti-
fying is not in faith of it fflfe, but in refped that it rcceueth Chrift, I
wiUiMgly graut it.For if faith did iuftitie of it ftlfeior by inward force,
as they call it and as it is alway feble and vnperfei^t, could not worke
iuftification but in part , fo fhould the iuftification be-maimed , that
Should gcuc vs but a pece of faluation. As for vSjWe imagine no fuch
thing , but m proper fpeaking do fay , that God onely iuftifieth : ?nd
then we geue the fame fo Chrift^becaufe he was ^cu^ vs vnto righrc-
oufiicfTe : and faith we compare as it were to a vellell . For except wc
came emptie with open mouth of our foule to craue the grace of
Chrift, we can not be able to receiue Chrift. Wherevpon we gather
that we do not take from Chrift the power of iuftifying , when wc
tcache that he is firft receiued by faith,bcfore th.it his nghteoufrKfic
be receiued. But yet I do not admit the crooked figures of this So-
phiftcr, whenhe faith that faith is Chrift; as if an ea; then pot were
a trcafure,becaufe gold is hidde m it.For the reafon is nor vnlike,buc
that faith although it be by it felfe of no worthines or price, may iu-
ftifie vs in bringing Chrift,as a pot full of money makcth a man riche.
Therefore 1 fay that faith , which is onely the inftrument to receiue
righceoufnefle,i$ vnfitly mingld with Chrift , which is the- materiall
caufc and both author and mimfter of fo great a benefit.Nowe i$ this
PP i;
Cap.i !• Of the maner how to rcceiuc
doubt alfo diflblued.Howc this wordc Faith ought to be vndcrftan*
dcd when we cntreate of iuftification.
8 In the rccciuing of Chrift he goth further : for he fayeth, that
the inward worde is rcceiued by the miniftration of the outwarde
worde, thereby to drawe vs from the priefthode of Chrift and the
perfone of the Mediacour to his outwarde Godhed. Asforvs,wc
dcuide not Chrift , but we fay that he is the fame eterrtall worde of
God , which reconcihhgTs to God in his fiefh , gaue vs rightcouf-
nclferand we confelTe that otherwife he could not haue fulfilled the
office of Mediatour,and purchaccd vs righteoufncfle, vnlcfle be had
bene eternall GodiBut this is Ofianders do<ftrinc , where as Chrift is
both God and manjthat he was made righteoufnefTe to vs,in refpeft
of his nature of Godhed , and not of manhode. But if this properly
belong to the Godhed » then it ftiaH not be peculiar to Chrift , but
common with the father and the holy Ghoft/or as much as there is
not one rightsoufiiefl'e of the one,& an other of the other .Morouer
that which was naturally from eternitie , could not be conueniently
faid to be made to vs. But although we graunt this, that God was
made righteoufneflc for vs : howe Ihall it agree that that which is
(at betwene,is made of God? Truely that properly bclongeth to the
perfone of the Mediatour : which though he conteine in him felfc
the nature of Godhcde, yet here he is fpecially fignified by his pro-
per tide, by which he is feuerally difccrned from the father and the
tre.xj. h^^y Ghoft. But he folifhly triumpheth in that one worde of Hierc-
mie,whcre he promifeth that the Lord lehoua ftialbe our righteouf*
neffe, but out of that he fhall gather nothing , but that Chrift which
is rigliteoufneSjis God openly fhewed in the flefti. In an other place
'<9:.»e. we haue rehearfed out of Paules fermo.that God purchaced to him-
^» felfe the Church with his bloud , if any man gather therevpon, that
the bloud wherewith finnes were purged was diuine , and of the na-
ture of Godhed , who can abide fo fowle an errour ? But Ofiander
tlirnkcth that with this fo childiihe a cauillation he hath gotten all
things, he fwellecb, he leapeth for icy , and ftuffeth many leaues full
with his bigge wordes : when yet there is a plaine and redy folution
for it in fayin^i that the worde lehoua in decde when he is made the
A- 53. iflue of Dauid llialbe the righteoufnefle of the godly : But Efaye tea-
'• cheth in what fenfe , faying : My iuft feruanr ihall with knowledge of
himfelfe iuftifie many. Let vs note that the father fpeaketh ; that he
geucth to the fonne the office of luftifying : he addeth a caufe , for
that he is iuft, and IctRcth the manner or meane as they call it in the
dodrine whcrby Chnft is knowcn.For it is a more comodious expo-
Htioa
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j. 299
fidon to take this wordc Daalj knowledge pafliucly. Hcrevpon I ga-
ther firft that ChriQ was made righteoufne ile when he did put on the
fourme of a feruaunt : fecondcly that he did iultitic vs in rcfped that
he (hewed him fclfe obedient to his father :iind that therefore he
cloth not this for vs according to his nature of Godhed , but accor-
ding to the office of dilpenfation committed vnto him. For although
God alone is thcfountaine of righteoufneiTe . & we be made righte-
ous by no other mcane but by the partaking of him : yet becaulc wc
are by vnhappy difagrcment cftranged from his righteoufneile , wc
muft ncedes come downe to this lower remedy, that Chrift may iu-
ftifie vs with the force of his death and refurreSion.
9 If he obied that this is a worke of fuch eKcellency , that it is
aboue the nature of manjand thcrfore can not be afcribed but to th*
nature of God, the 6rft I graunt : but in the fecond I fay that he is
vnwifely dcceiued.For although Chrift could neither clenfe our fou-
les with his bloud , nor appcafc his father with his facrifice , nor ac-
cjuitc vs fro giUinefle,nor do the office of pricft,' vnkfle he had bene
true God,becaufe the ftrength of the flefh had bene to weake for fo
great a burdcn:yet it is certain chat he performed all thefe things ac-
cordmg to his nature of manhod.For if it be demaundcd how we be
iuftifiedjPaule anfwereth,by the obedience of Chrift. But did he any Rom j
otherwife obey than by taking vpon him the {hap e of a feruatPwher- ^ ^*
vpon wc gather tliat righteouftiefle was geue vs in his flcfli.Likewife
in the other wordes (which I maruell that Ofiander is not afliamed
to allege fo often) he apointeth the fountaine of righteoufnefle no
where els but in the flelh of Chrift. Him that knew no (inne he made
finne for vs,that wc might be y righteoufiicfte of God in him.Ofian-
der with full mouth aduaunceth the righteoulhes of God,and trium-
phethas though he had proued that it is his imaginatiuc Ghoft of
cflentiall righteoufnefle : when the wordes found far otherwife, that
we be righteous by the cleanfing made by Chrift. Very yong begin-
ners fhould not haue bene ignorant that the righteoufnefle of God
is taken for the righteoufnefle that God allowcth, as in lohn, where loh.ic
the glorie of God is compared with the glorie of men. I knowc that
fometimc it is called the righteouGicfle of God,whcrcof God is the
authour and which God geueth vs:buc though I fay nothing,the rc-
dcrs that haue their found wit do pcrceiue that nothing els is meant
in this place but that weftande vpright before the iudgement featc
of Godjbeing vpholdcn by the cleanfing facrifice of Chriftes death.
And there is not fo great importance in the word, fo that Ofiander
do agree with vs m diis point that we arc iuftificd in Chrift , in this
PP iij
Cap. I T . Of the maner how to receiuc
reipcd ihat he was made a propiciatorie facrifice for vs , which can
not Agree with his nature of Godhed. After wliich forr, when Chrift
meaneth to feale the righceoufnefle & faluation that he hath brought
vs , he fetteth before vs an alFured pledge thereof in his flefh. He
doth in decde caU hjm feife the lyuely bred,but exprefling the man-*
ner here,he addeth that bis Hefh is verily meate, and his bloud is ve-
rily drinke. Which manner of teaching is fene in the Sacramentes,
which although they dired our faith to whole Chrift,and not to halfe
Chrift,yet they do there withall teache that the matter of righteouf-
nelfe and faluation remaineth in his flefli: Not that in that that he if
oncly man,he cither iuftifieth or quickeneth of him felfe,but becaufe
it pleafed God to (hewe openly in the mediatour that wbjch was
hidden and inconjprehenfible in himfclfe, whereupon I am wonc
to (ay,that Chrift is as it were a fountaine fet op5 for vs, out of which
we may drawe that which otherwife (hould without fruite ly hidden
in ihat clofc and depe fpiing that rifeth vp vnto vs in the perfone of
the Mediatour.ln tns m;inner & meaning,! do not deny that Chrift
3S he IS God and man doth iuftifie vs , and that this is alfo the workc
of the father & the holy Ghoft as well as hi$.Finally,th3tthe righte-
oufnclTe whereof Chrifl makcth vs partakers , is the ctemall righte-
oulhelTe of the eternall Godjfo that he yelde to the fure and plainc
rcafons that I haue alleged.
lo Nowethathc fhoulde not with hiscauillationsdeceiuethc
vnfkilfuJI J graunt that we want this incomparable benefit^till Chrift
be made ours Therefore wc fet that conioyning of the head and the
membies,the dwelling of Chrift in our heartes, and that mifticall
vnion, in the hieft degree ; that Chrift being made ours , may make
vs partakers of the giftcs wherewith he is endued. Therefore we do
not beholde him a far of out of our fclucs,thacrighteoufpefie may be
imputed vnio vs,but becaufe we haue put on him,and are grafFed into
his body : finally becaufe he hath vouchfaued to make vs one with
him, therefore we glorie that we haue a feilowfhip of righteoufjicffe
with him. So is Oiianders fclaunderous cauillation confuted , where
he faith that we compt faith righteoufnefte , as though we (polled
Chrift oFhis rightjwhenwe fay that we come by faith empty to him,
to geue roume to his grace , that he onely may fil vs. But Ofiander
refufing this fpirituall conioining , enforceth a grofle mingling with
the fait hfull , and therefore he odioufly calleth all them Zuinghans
that fubfci ibe not to his fantafticall errour,cocerning eflentiall righte-
oufnefteibecaufe they do nor thinke that Chrift is fubftacially eaten
in the Lordes fuppcr. As for me,I compt it a great glorie to be Co re-
proched
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 3°^
proceed of a proude man & geuen to his owne erros. Albeit he tou-
cheth not me oncly,buc alio other writers well knowen to the world,
whom he ought to haue modeftly reuereced. It moueth mc nothing,
which meddle not with mine owne priuate caufe : and fo much the
more fincerely I handle thiscaufe.being free from all corrupt affec-
tion. Whereas therefore he fo importunately requireth tfl'^ntiall
rightcoufncfl'e, and the cflentiall dwelling of Chnft m vs , it t' ndeth
to this ende : Fiitt that God fliould with a grofle mixture poure hun
felf into vs,as he faineth a flelhly eating of Chrift in y fupper :recond-
ly that God (houldc breath his righteoufneffe into vs , whereby we
nnay be really righteous with him : for by his opinion,this righttouf-
ncfle is as well God him felfcjas the goodnefle or holinellejor pui e-
neflc of God . I will not fpende much labour in wiping away ihe ter
ftimonies that he bringeth , which he wrongff^lly wrefteth from the
heauently life to this prefencftate. Through Chnft(rayth Peter)are«'-Per.t.
geue vs the precious & moft great promifeSjihar we ihouU be nuide '^'
partakers of the nature of God: As though we wearcnowe fuch as
thcGofpell promifedthat wefhaibeat thtlaftcomming of Chnft;
yea lohntellethvs, that we ftiall then fee God as heis,becaufe we i.Iobn,
(halbe like vnto him. Onely I thought good to geue a fmall taft to ?«t«
the readers, that I do of purpofe palle ouer thefe trifles : not for that
it is hardc to confute them , but bccaufe I will not be tedious m a fu-
perfluous worke.
II But in the fccode point lurketh more poiforijwhere he teachcth
that we are righteous together with God.I thinkc I haue already fuff.
ficiently proued,that although this dodrinc were not fo peftilent,ye|;
becaufe it is colde and fruteicfle, & of it (cKc Co vaine that it meltcth
away,it ought worthely to be vnfauorie to found and godly Readers.
But this is an intolerable wickednefle,vnder pretcfe of double righre-
oufnefle , to enfeble the earneft affuraunce of faluarion, and to cary
vs abouc the cloudes,that we ftiould not embrace by faith the grace
of propici3tion,& call vpon God with quiet. mindes. Ofiandcr fcor-
neth the.that teach that this word Tuftifying is a law termcbccaufc,
we muft be righteous indeede. Andheabhorrcth nothingemore
than fo fay, that we be iuftified by free imputation.But,if God do not
iuftifie vs by acquiiingand pardoning, what meaneth that faying of
Paule,God was in Chrift reconciling the world to him fclfe, not im- i.Cor,
puting to men their (inncs.For,him that had done no finne,he made J«» u
finne for vs,that we might be the righf coufnes of God in him. Firft
Iwinne thus much, that they be iudged righteous that be recon*
cilcd to God. Tlie manner howe is declared , for that God iuftificth
PP iiij
Cap. 1 1 . Of the maner how to receiuc
by forgciiiog : as in an other place iuftification is fee as contrary t«
accufacion , which comparing of them as contraries , doth clerely
iliewe that it is aphrafc borrowed from the vfc ofthelawc. And
there is no man being but meanly pradifcdin the Hebrew tongue,if
he haue a fober braine.that is ignoraunt that this phrafc came from
thence,and whereunto it tendcth,and what it mcaneth.Nowc where
Paule fayeth that Dauid defcribed y righteoufnefl'e without worke$,
loin.4. in thcfe wordes , Biclfed are they whofc finnes are forgeucn:Let
Ofiandcr aunfwcre mc whether this be a full definition or but halfe
•^^'**aone. Truely Paule bringcih not in the Prophet for a witneffe , as
though he taught that forgcuencffc of finnes is but apart of righte-
oufnesjora thing that ioineth with other to the iuftifyingof mam
But he mcludcth whole nghteoufnes in free forgeuenefl'c,pronoun~
cing the man blefTed, whofe finnes are couercd, to whom God hath
forgeuen imquities,and to whom he imputeth no tranfgreflionsiHc
doth raeafure and iudgc fuch a mans fehcitie thereby , becaufe he is
not this way righteous in dcede,but by imputation. Oliander taketh
exception and fayeth, that this fhould be fclaunderous to God, and
contrary to his nature,if he lliould iuftifie them that in deede remainc
ftill wicked. But we muft remember, as Ihauc already faidc, that the
grace of iuftifying is not feuered from regeneration , although thty
be feuerall things. But becaufe iris more than fufficiently knowen by
expcrience,that there abide alwaies in the righteous fome remnan*
tes of finne , it muft needes be that they be farre otherwifc iuftificd
than they be reformed intone wnelfe of life. For this later point of
reformation,God fo bcginncth in his eled , & througi .out the whole
courfe of their life,by htle & litle,& fomtime flowly procedeth in it,
thatchcy be alway before his feat in danger of y iudgement of death.
But he iuftifieth them,notby partmeale , but fo that they may freely,
as clothed with the punencs of Chrift,appere in heauen For no por-
tion of righteoufncffe could appeafc our confcienccs , fill they be fa-
tisfiedthat God is fully pleafed with vs , becaufe wc be righteous in
his fii^ht with out exception. Whcrupon followcth.that the dodrine
of iuftificationis mifturned,yea oucrturn^ed from the very foundatio,
when doutingc is caft into mens mindes , when the affiance of falua-
tion IS fhaken , when the free and drcdleifc inuocadon is hindered,
yea when quiet and tranquillitic with fpirituall ioy is not ftablifhed.
Wherevpon Paule gathercth an argument by contraries , to prouc,
that the inheritance is not by the lawe.For by this meanc faith lliould
be made voidc , which if it haue refped to workcs, is ouerthrowcn,
fbccaufc none of the moft holy {hall iherin finde wherevpon to truft.
Thi5
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 501
This difference ofiuftifyingc and regeneratingc (which two thinges.
Ofiandcr confounding together , calleth two fortes of righteoulnes)
is very well cxprelfed by Paule:For fpcaking of his reall righreoufncs
in dcedcjor of the vprighines wherewith he was endued (which O-
(landLer nameth eflentiall righteoufnclle ) he lamentably crierh out:
Wretch that I am: who fhall dehuer mc from the body of this death? Rom- :
But Heeinge to the righteoufncs which is grounded ypon the onely *4»
mercy of God,hc glorioully triumphcth ouer bothhfc,death,repro'
ches,hunger,fword,and alladuerfitics. Who lliallaccufe the cledes
oi God whome bciuftifieth?For I r-m furely perfwadedjthat nothing Rom J
{hall feucre vs fi o his loue in Chrift.He plainly publirheth,y he hath J }•
the righteoufnes which alone fully fufficeth toialuatio before God,
lb that the wretched bondage which he knowing to be m hirnfelfc,
did alitle before bewaile his cftate^may not monilK nor any way hin-
der his boldncs to glory .This diuerHty is fufficiently knowen,and To
familiar to all the holy one?,th3t gronc vnder the burden of iniqui-
.ties,& yet with vidorious confidencCjdo mount vp abouc all feares*
As for this thatOlianderobiecleth, that it difagreeth with the na-
ture of God, it falleth vpon himfelfe. For alchou£;h he clotheth the
holy ones with a double rightcoufnes as it were with a furred gar-
ment, yet he is compelled to confcfle that without forgiuenelfe of
finncs they neucr pleafcd God. If that be true , then at leaft let him
graunt , that they which are not righteous in deede , are accompted
righteous accordinge to the appointed proportion of imputation,as
they call it. But how farre ihall a linner extcnde this free acceptation
that is put in place of rightcoufnesPfhall he meafure it by the pound
or by the ouncc?TrueIy he Ihall hang doutfulland vvaucring to this
fide & that h"de, bccaufe he may not take vnto him fo much righte-
oufhelfc as ihalbc neceflary to ftabhlhe confidence. It is happy that
he that would binde God to a Iaw,is not iudge of this caufe.But this
fliall ftan^le ftedfaft , that thou mayft be iuftified in thy faymges and
oucrcomc when thou art ludged . But howc great prefumption is it Pf. j m
to condemne the chicfe iudge when he freely acquiteth, that this
aunfwerc may not be in force, I will haue mercy vpon whomc I will
haue mercy. And yet the interceflTion of Mofes which God did put to -
filence with this faying , tended not to this endc that he Ihould fparc 10°'*'
none,but that he (hould acquite altogether, taking away their con-
demnation although they were gilty ofoffenfe . And we do fay that
they which were loft haue their finncs buried and fo arc iuftified
before God:bccaufc,as God hateth finne,fo he ca louc none bat the
whom he iuftifieth . But this is a maruciloM manner of iuftify mge.
Cap.i I . Of the maner how to recciue
that they being couered with the rightcoufnefle of Chrift (land not
in feare of the ludgement which they haue deferucdjand when they
worthily condemne themfelues are accompted righteous without
themfelues.
] t But the readers arc to be warned , that they take good heedc
tothemiftery which he braggethchathe will not hide from them.
For after that J?e hath longe and largely trauailed to proue that wc
do not obtainc" fauour with God by the only imputati5 of the righ-
tcoufnelTe of Chrift > becaufe this (liould be impoirible for him to
compt them for righteous that are not righteous , ( I vfe his owne
wordes)3t length hcconcludcththat Chrift was giuenvsvnto righ-
tcoufnes, not m refpedof his nature of manhoode but of his nature
of Godhead:and that although this righteoufneffe can not be found
but in the perfon of the Mediatourjyet it is the rightcoufneflc not of
ma but of God.he doth now binde vp his rope made of two righte-
oufncflcs , but he plainely taketh away the office of iuftifyinge from
Chnftes nature of manhode.But it is good to fee how he difagr eeth.
It'is fayd in the fame place.that Chrift was made vnto wifdom,which
belongcth to none but to the eternal word.Thercfore Chrift in that
he is m.m is not wifdom. I anfwere that the onely begotten fonne of
pjj^, Godwasin decde his etcrnall wifedome, butin Pauleswrytinges
that name isgiuen him in diuerfewife, becaufe all the treafures of
wjfdom and knowledge are layd vp in him. That therefore which he
had with his father.he difclofed vnto vstand fo that which Paul faith
is not referred vnto the eflfencc of the fonne of God, but to our vfe,
and.isrighily applied to Chriftes nature of manhoode : becaufe al-
though he {hined a light in darkenes,before that he did put on flefti,
ohn 8. y^' " ^^^ ^ hidden light till the fame Chrift came foorth in the na-
2. turcofman.theihiningefunneofrighteoufntflc, which therefore
calleth himfelfe the light of the world. Alfo it is foolifhly obieded of
him,that the power of luftifying is farre aboue both Angels and men:
forafmuch as this hangethnot vpon the worthineftc of any creature,
butvponthe ordinance of God. If Angels will take vpon them to
fatisfieGodjthey can nothinge prcuaile,becaufe they are not appoin-
Ja.3 1 3 ted therunto.But this fingularly belonged to Chrift being man,which
was made fubied to the law, to redemc vs from the curfe of the law.
Alfo he doth fclaunderoufly cauill , that they which deny that Chrift
is our righteoufnefle accordingc to his nature of Godhead, do leauc
but one part of Chrift, &(which is worfc)do make two gods.becaufc
although they confefle,that God dwelleth in vs, yet they fay againc
, that we are not righteous by the rightcoufnes of God. For although
wc
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 3^^"
%yc call Chrift the author of life > in refpfd that he futfercd deatn to
deftroy him that had the power of death , we do not byandby tike
away that honor from whole Chrift as he was openly (hewed Gcd HeKg.
in the flell?,but we only make a diftindion how the righteoufnes of 1 4.
God is conueied vnto ys,y we may enioy iLln which point Ofijndcr
hath too fowly erred Neither do we deny that that which is openly
giiien vs in Chrift,proceedeth fro the fecret grace & power of God:
& we ftriue not againft thi.«,that the righteoufnefle which Chrjft gi-
tieth vs is the righteoufnelTc of God that proceedeth from God:buc
we hold this ftedf3ftly,thatwc haue righteoufnes & life in the death
& refurredion of Chrift. I ouerpafte that heaping together of places
wherof he may wel be a (hamedjwherwith he hath tcdioufly cobred
the readers without choife & without common reafon,to proue that
wherfoeuer is made mention of righteoufneSjthere ought to be vn-*
derftanded this eflentiall righteoufnes. As where Dauid calleth vpon
the righteoulAefte of God to help himrwhereas he doth the fame a-
boue a hundred timeSjOhander fticketh not to corrupt fo many (en*
tences.Andnothing ftroger is the other obiedion,that that is pro-
perly and rightly called righteoufnefle, whereby we be moucd to da.
rightly.but that God only wo- keth in vs both to will & to performe.
For wedoalfo notdeny, but that God reformethvs with his Spinte .
vnto holincffc of life and righteoufnes: but we muft Hrft fee whether ,,'*'**
he do this by himfelfe and immediarly,or by the hand of his ^onne;
•with whom he hath left all the fullncfleof hij holy Spirit , that with
his abundant ftore he (hould fupply the ncde of his members. More-
oucr although righteoufnefle come vnto vs out of the fecret foun-
taine of the godhead,yct it followeth not that Chrift which fandificd ^^^^
himfelfe in the flefli for our fakeSjWas righteoufnes vnto vs according ,p/
to his natureof godhead. No leflTe fonde is that which he fayth, that
Chrift himfelfe was righteous by the righteoufnes of God. Becaufe
ynlcflc V wil of his father had moued him,h-- could not himfelfe hauc
(atisfied y office comittcd vnro him. For though we haue in an other
place faydjthat all the deferuings of Chrift himfelfe do procede fiom
the mere good will of God, yet y makcth no: hing to that fanrafticall
thingjwhcrwith O (lander bewitchcth both his owne & fimple mens
cyes.Forwho wouUe fuftera man to gather this condufion, that be-
caufe God is the fountainc & beginning of our righteoufnefle, ther-
fore we be eflcntially righteous, & the elfence of Gods righteoufne*
dwellethinvs? In red ;reminge the church (fayth Efav) God did put ^r
on his righteoufnelfc as a harnefle : but did he fc to fpoilc Chrift of 7-^/ ^^*
his armure which he hadde giuen him , to make him to be no perfedi
Cap.i I. Of the mancr how to rccciuc
redeemer? But the Prophet meant nothing elfe but that God boro-
wed nothing out of himfclfcnor was holpen by any aide to redemc
vs.Which thing Paul briefely cxpreffed in other wordcs,faying chat
, he gaue vs faluation to the lliewinge of his rightcoufnelfc . But thif
doth not oucrthrowe that which he tcachcth in an other place , that
we arc righteous by the obedience of one man . Finally whofoeucr
p, ' * wrappcth vp a double rightcoufncffe, that poorc foules may not reft
in the mere only mercy of God,he doth in a mockery crowne Chrift
withthornes.
I J But forafmuch as a great parte of mcn,imagineth righteoufnes
to be made of faith andwwks,lct vs firft (hew this alfojthat the tigh»
teoufnclTc of faith and workes do fo differ, that when the one is fta-
hilip. 3 bliflicd, the other muft needcs be oucrthrowcn,The Apoftle fay eth
that he eftecmcd all things as dong,that he might winne Chrift and
findc in him the righteoufhcffe that is of God by fayth , comptingc
not his righteoufn elTe that which is by the law , but chat which is by
the faith of Icfu Chrift.You fee that here is alfo a coparifon of cotra-
rics & that here is declared that he which wil obtainc the righteouf-
nefTe of Chrift , muft forfakc his owne rightcoufnefle. Therefore in
an other place he fayeth , that this was the caufc of fall to the Icwcs
that going about to ftabUfh their owne righteoufnes , they were not
fubicd to the righieoufnefie of God.f f m ftabhfhing our owne righ-
teoufncfle we Ihakc away the righteoufneflc of God , therefore to
obtaine Gods righteoufnes our owne muft be vtterly abolifhed. And
lorn. 3. he iheweth the fame thinge,whcn he fayth,that our gloryinge is not
7. excluded by the la\T>but by faith.Wherupon foUowcth that fo long
as there rcmaincth any righteoufneflfe of workcSjhowe litlc foeuer it
be,therc ft ill remaineih to vs fome matter to glory vpo.Now if faith
exclude all glorying , then the righteoufneffe of workes can no wife
be coupled with the righteoulhcs of faith. To this efte^ he fpeaketh
. fo plainely in the 4. chapter to Romaines,that he Icaueth no roume
' for caoillations or (Hiftes : If (fayth he) Abraham was iuftified by
workes , he hath glory . Andimmcdiatly he addech:but he hath no
glory in the fight of God It followcth therforc that he was not iufti*
feed by workes.Thcn he bringeth an other argument by contraries,
when reward is rendered to workes , that is done of dct and not of
grace.But rightcoufncfte is giuen %o faith according to grace: Ther-
forc it is not of the deferuinges of workes.Wherefore farewell their
dreamcjthat imagine a righteoufnes made of faith & workes ming^
led together.
14 The Sophifters thinke that they hauc a futtle fhift, tliat make
to
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 305
to thcmfelucs fport and paftimc with wrefting of Scripture and with
vainc cauillations. For they expound works in that place to be thofc
which me not yet regenerate do only literally & by ihc endeuour of
free will without the grace of Chcift:& do fay that itbelongeih not
to (pirituall workes . So by their opinion a man is iuftified both by
faith & by workes, fo that the workes be not his ownc, but the giftf
qf Chrift and frutes of regeneration . For they fay that Paule fpake
fo for none other caufc,but to conuince y Iewcs,trufting vpon their
ownc workes, that they didfooliflily prefumc to claimerighteouf-
nefle to themfelueSjfith the only Spirit of Chrift doth giuc it rs, and
not any endeuour by our ownc motion of nature. But they do not
marke that in the comparifon of the rightcoufnelfc of the lawc and
the righteoufnesof the Gofpell.which Paul brmgeth in in an other
place , all workes are excluded with what tide focucr they be ador-
ned.For he teacheth that this is the rightcoufnefle of the lawc, that
he fliouldobcaine faluation that hath performed that which the law Ga.|.ii
commaundeth:& that this is y righteoufnes of faith,if we belcue that
Chrift died and is rifcn againc. Moreouer wc Ihall hereafter fhcw iri
place fit for it,that fandification & righteoufnes are feucrall benefites
ofChrift.Wherupon follovvcth that the very fpirituall workes come
not into the accompt , when the power of iuftifyinge is afcribcd to
faith. And where Paul dcnieth(as I eucn now alleaged)that Abraham
had any thinge whereupon to glory before Godjbecaufe he was not
made righteous by worlces : this ought not to be reftrained to the li-
terall and outward kinde of vertues , or to the endeuour of free will.
But although the Ufe of the patriarch Abraham were fpirituall & in
nianer Angelike, yet he had not fufficientdeferuingcs of workes to
purchace him rightcoufnefle before God.
I J The Scholeme teach a litle more grofly that mingle their pre-
parations:but thefe dolefle infedthc (imple and vnskilful with cor-
rupt dodrine,vnder pretenfe of Spirit and grace hiding the mercf of
God which onely is able to appeafe trembhngc confcicnccs . But wc
confefTe with Paul that the doers of the law are iuftified before God:
but becaufe we are all farre from the keeping of the law,hercupon wc
gather, that the workes which (liould moft of all hauc auailed to righ-
teoufneSjdo nothing help vs becaufe wc lackc the. As for the comon
Papiftes or Schoolemen,thcy are in this point dxxibly deceiued:both
becaufe they call faith an afluredneflfc of confciencc in lookinge for
reward at the hande of God for dcferuingcs,and alfo becaufe they cx-
pounde the grace of God not to be a free imputation of rightcouf-
nefle, buMhe holy Qhoft helping to ihc endeuour of hoUncffcThc^^
Cap. 1 1 • Of the maner how to receiuc
kb.1 1, read in the Apoftic that he which commech to God,nnuft firft bclcoc
^' that there is a God, and then that he is a rendrer of reward to them
that feeke him. But they marke nor, what is the mancr of feking. And
that they arc decciucd in the name of grace , is pbinely proued by
lent. li. their owne wry tings. For Lombard expoundeth,tliatiulhfication by
•dift. Chrift is giuen vs two wayes.Firft(fayth he)the death of Chnftdoth
6.ca.2. iuftiiie vs,when[ by it charity is ftirred vp in our heartes, by which wc
arc made righteous. Secondly that by the fame death finne is de-
ftroyed y whereby Sathan held vs captiue , fo ihitn6wc he hath not
whereby to condemne vs. You fee how he confidcrethchegraceof
God principally in iuftificatiojto be (o far as we are direded to ^ood
works by the grace of the holy Ghoft.He woulde forfoth haue folo-
vrcd the opinion of Auguftinc;but he foloweih him a far of, & goeth
far out of the way from rightly followinge him.becaufe if Auguftinc
haue fpoken any thing plainly he darkcneth it,if there be any thinge
in Auguftine not very ynpure^he corrupteth it.The Scholeme haue
ftil ftraied from worfe to worfe,till with headlong fall at length they^
he rolled downe into a Pelagian errour. Andthevery fentenceof
AuguftinCjOr at leaft his manner of fpeakinge is not altogether to be
rcceiued.For though he fingufarly welltaketh from man all praife of
rightcoufnefTe andaffigneth it wholly to the grace of God, yet he
referreth grace to fandificaiion^wherby we are renued into newneflc
of life by the holy Ohoft.
i6 But the Scripiare,whcn it fpeaketh 6ry rtghteoufhes of faithy
leadeth vs to a far other ende,that is to fay, that r urning away fro the
loking vpo our owne workes, we iTiouhi only loke viito the mercy of
God & perfedio of Chrift.For it teacheth this order of iuftification,
that firft God vouchfaueth to embrace man beinge a finner wirh his
mere & free goodncs confidering nothing in him but mifery wherby
hemaybemoucdtamercy, forafmuch as he feeth him altogether
n;ikcd & voide of good workes, fetchmg fro himfelfe the caufe to do
him good:ihen,that he moueth the finner himfelfe with fethng of his
goodnes , which dcfpeiring vpon his owne workes cafteth al y fumme
of his (:iluation vpon Gods mercy . This is the feehnge of faith, by
which fcling the finner comcth ifnto polTeffion of his faluation,whei»
he acknowledgeth by the doftrinc of the Gofpel that he is recociled
to God.rhat obtaininge forgiucnes of finncs by meanes of the righ-
teoufncs of Chrifljhe is iuftified:& although he be regenerate by the
Spirite of God, he thinketh vponconiinuallrighteoufneffe layed vp
for him not in the good workes to which he applreth himfclf,but in f
only iighieoulhcs of Chrift. Whc thcfe things ftialbc eucty one par-
ticular
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 5^4*
•icularly weied,they fliall giue a perfed declaration of our femencc-
Albeit they might be better difpofed in an other order tha they are fee
forch,But it maketh litle matter, fo y they hang together in fuch fore
that we may hauc the whole matter truely declared & furely proued.
17 Here it is good to remember the relation that we hauc before
faid to be betwene faith and the Gofpcll r becaufe it is fayd for this
caufc that faith iuftifieth,for that it receiueth & embraceth the righ-
teoufnefle offered in the gofpel. And whereas it is fayd to be oflfered
by the gofpeljthereby all confideration of works is excluded Which
thing Paul declarech many times clfc whcre,but moft plamly in two
places For,to the Romaines,coparingthe law & the gofpci together R<«»-«»
he fayth:the righteoufnes that is by the law is thus,the ma that doth ' *
thefe ihinges /hall hue in thcm.But the nghteoufnefic that is of faith
offereth faluation , if thou beleue in thy heart and confeffc with thjr
moutli the Lord Iefus,& that the father hath raifed him vp from the
dead. See you not how he maketh this the difference of the law and
the gofpeljthat the law giueth righteoufneffe to workes,and the go-
fpeligiueth free rightcoufneflfe without helpe of workes?it is a nota-
ble place,and that may dehuer vs out of many hard doutes,if wc vn-
derftande that the fame righteoufnefrc that is giuen vs by the gofpel
is free from all conditions of the law. This is the reafon,why he doth
more than once with great feeminge of contrariety fet the promifc
by way of oppofition againft the lawe , as if the inheritance be of the Oa.3.if
law.tnen is it not of the promifc : and all the reft in the fame chapter
to the fame effed.Tuuely the law it felf hath alfo her promifes.Ther-
fbre there muft needes be in the promifes of the gofpell,fomethingc
different & diuerfe from the promifes of the laWjVnlefTe we will con-
feffe that the comparifon is very fonde . But what diuerfity ihall this
be, vnleffe it be that they are freely giuen, and vpholdcn by the only
mercy of God,whereas the promifes of the law hang vpon the con-
dition of workes. Neither Ictte any manne here carp agamfl me, and
fay , that m this place the righteoufneffe is reieded which menne of
their owne force and freewill would compell God to rcceiue : foraf-
much as Paul without exception tcacheth that the law in commaun- Ro.S.a.
dinge profiteth nothinge:becaufe there is none not only of the com-
mon muhitude, but alfo of the perfedeft , that fulfilieth it.Loue vn-
doutedly is the chiefe point of the law : when the Spiritc of God fra-
meth vs vnto it , why is it not to vs a caufe of righteoufnciTc , but for
that euen in the holy ones it is vnperfed,and therefore of it felfe dc-
ferueth no reward.
18 The fecond place is this. It ii mantfefl that no man is iuihBcd
*Cap.i I . Of the mancr how to rcceiuc
by the law before God:Becaufe the righteous man (hall hue by faith*
ra.3.ia But the law is not of faith ; but the man that doth thcfe thinges ihall
hue in them. How coulde this argument othci wife ftandc together,
vnlefle we agree vpon this point, that workes come not into the ac*
compt of faith,but are vtterly to be fcuered from it ? The lawe(rayth
hc)differcth from faith.Why fo > becaufe workes arc required to the
righceoufnefle thereof. Therefore itfoUowcth that workes arc not ^
required to the righteoufnefle of faith. By this relation it app^areth,
that they which are iuftified by faith arc iuftijicd befidc the deferuing
of workes, yea without the deferuing of workes, becaufe faith recei-
ueth that righteoufnes which the Gofpel giucth. And the Gofpel dif-
fercth from the law in this point, chat it bmdeth not righrcoufnes to
workes,but fctteih it in the only mercy of God. Like hereunto is that
ona 4. w'liich he affirmeth to the Romaines,that Abraham had nothingc to
• glory vpon,becaufe faith was imputed to him vnto righteoufnelTe, &
he addeth a confirmation, becaufe then there is place for the righte-
oufneflTe of faith, whe there are no workes to which a reward is due.
Where be workes (fayth he)dpe reward is rendered vnto themrthat
which is giucn to faith is freely giuen . For the very meaninge of the
words that he vfeth in that place ferue to proue the fame. Wheras he
adioyneth within a litle after,that therfore we obtaine the inheritacc
by faith as according to grace,hereupon he gathcreih that the inhe-
ritance is of free gift,bccaufe it is receiued by fayth:and howc com-
meth y,but becaufe faith without any help of workes leaneth wholly
vpon the mercy of God?And in the fame meaning, without dout he
om.j. teacheth in an other place,that the righteoufnes of God was openly
flicwcd without the law, although it haue witncflc borne of it by the
law & the Prophets: becaufe excluding the law,he fayth chat it is not
holpcn by workes, and that we obtaine it not by working, but come
empty that we may receiue it.
19 By this time the reader perceiueth with what equity the Sophf-
fters do at this day cauill at our dodrine, when we fay that man is iu-
ftified by faith only .They dare not deny that man is iufiified by faith
becaufe it is fo often found in Scripture: but becaufe this word,Only,
is neuer txprcfled,they can not abide to haue fuch an addition made.
Is it fo ? But what will they anfwerc to thcfe wordes of Paule,wherc
''^^^ he affirmeth that righteoufncffe is not of faith except it be freely gi-
ucn ? Howe can free gift agree with workes ? And with what cauilla-
tions will they mocke our,that which he fayth in an other place,that
om.i. the righteoufnefleof God ismanifeftly (hewed in theGo(pcIl-' If
7* righceoufnefle be manifeftly fliewed in the Gofp ell , furely therin is
con-
The grace of Chrift, Lib.j, 30$
contained not a toineorhalfc nghtcoufneflc but full andperftd.
Therefore the law hath no place therein. And they ftand vpon not
onely afalfc but alfo a foolifii Ihift about this exclufiue woid,Only.
Doth not he pcrfedly enough giue all thinges to onely fayth , that
taketh all thmgcs from workes f What, I pray you meane thefe fay- Rom. 5
inges: that righteoufnefTe was manifeftly fliewed without the 1 awe: ii«&»'^
that man is iulhfied freely and without the ^^orkes ofthe lawe r Here
they haue a witty fliift to efcape withall, which although they deui -
fed It not thefelues but borrowtd it of Origen & ccrtaine of tiie old
Wj yters, yeris very foolilh. They prate that the ceremoniall workes
t>f the law,not the rDOrall,are excluded.Thcy profit fo with contmu-
all brawhnge,thatthfy knowenatthe veryfirtt rules. of Logike. Do
fheyrhinke that the Apoftle doted when he alleagedthefe places to
f»roue his fayinge f Theman that lliall do. thefc thinges lliall liuc in Ga.j.ie
themrand , Curfed is euery one that ftilfilleth not all thinges that are
wrytren inthe volume of the lawe. Vnlcfie they bemaddejthty will
not (ay that life was promifed to the kepers of Ceremonies, or curfc '>'*
jhrttened onely to the breakers ofthem.If thefe places be to be vn-
deriUnded of the moral law,it is no dout that the morall workes alio
are excluded from the power of luftifying.To the fame purpofe ferue Rom. i.
thefe argumemesthathe vfeth : becaufethe knowledge of (inneio.&4.
-was by the lawe,thercfore righteoufnefTe is not by the law>e. Becaufe Mi-
llie lawe worketh wrath, therefore It woiketh not righteoufneffe,
Becaufe the lawe can not make confciencc aflured , therefore alfo it
can not giue righteoufneflc . Becaufe faith is imputed vnto righte-
oufnefl'ejtherefore righteoufnefTe is not a reward of worke,but is^gc-
ucn bcinge not due. Becaufe we are luflificd by faith, therefore glo-
ryingeiscutteof. If there had bin a law giuen that might giue life, Ga,'2.2i
tlaen nghteoufnefTe were tiuely by the law : but .Godhath Ihutte vp
all vnder finne that the promife might be giuen to the bclcuers . Let
them nowe fondly fay if they dare, that thefe thinges are fpokcn of
ceremonies and not of manners: but very children would hjfi'e out fo
great fhamelefneffe.Therefore let vs holde this for certaine,th at the
whole lawe is fpoken of, when the power of iuftifyingc is taken awajr
•from the law.
, .zo But if any man maruell why the Apoftle vfed futh an addition,
not beinge content with onely naming of workes.the reafon is ready
to be fhcwed for it.For,alihough workes be fo hiely eftemed, yet they
haue that value by the allowance of God , rather than by their ownc
worthinefTe . For who can boaf^ vnto God of any righteoufnelTc of
workes, but that which he hath allowed ? Who dare claimc any re-
■ QSL
Cap.i I . Of the iiiancrhowto rcceiue
ward a$ due vnto the,butfuch as he hath promireci?They haucthcr-
forethisofthc bountifulnes of God,y they are copted worthy both
of the name & reward of righteournefre.& they be of value only for
this caufe,whe the purpofe of him that doth them is by the to fhew
Ca.j. 7 his obediece to God. Wherfore y Apoftie in an other place,to prouc
r* that Abraham could not be iuftified by workes, alleageth thaty law
was giuen, almoft foure Ijpndrcd & thirty yeares after the couenant
made Vnlcarned me would laugh at fuch an argumetjbecaufe there
might be righteous workes before the publifiiing of the law. But be-
caufe he knew y there was no fuch value in works but by the teftimo-
ny & vouchfauing of Gpd,therfore he taketh it as a thing cofefTed f
before the law they had no power to iuftifie. We vnderttand why he
namely exprefletli y worke of tlie law, whe he meaneth to take away
iuftjtkation from any workes becaufe controuerfy may be mouedof
thofe & none other. Albeit fomtime he excepteth all workes without
any addition,as when he fay th that by the teuimony of Dauid blef*
Ro.4.6. fednes is adigned'Co that man, to whom the Lord imputeth rightc*
oufnes without workes.Therforc they can with no caudlations bring
to paffe,but that we (hnl get this general exclu{iue,only. And they do
in vaine fecke that trifling futtelty, that we are iuftrfied by that only
faith which worketh by loue, fo-that righteoufnes muft ftande vpon
Q 6. loue.We graunt in deede with Pauljthat no other faith iuftifiethjbut
that which is efteftually workinge with charity : but that faith taketh
not her power of luftifying from that effedualnes of charity. Yea it
doth by no other meane iuftifie , but becaufe it bringeth vs into the
communicating of the righteoufnes of Chnft. Or elfe all that which
the Apoftie fo earneftly preffethjfticulde fall to nought.To hirri that
Rom.4, worketh (fay th he) the reward is notreckened accordingc to grace,
^' but accordinge to det. But to him that worketh not, but beleueth in
him that iuftiScth the vnrighteous, his faith is imputed vnto righte-
oufneSjCould he fpeake more euidcnily than in fo rayfng?that there
is no righteoufnes of faith but where there are no works to which a-
ny reward is due: & that onely then faith is imputed vnto righteouf-
nes,when righteoufnes is giuen by grace that is notdue.iivol t>iwriy/
z I Now let vs examine how true that is, which is fay d in thedc-
linition,thtit the righteoufnes of faith is therccociliation with God,
which confifteth vpon the only forgiuenes of finnes.We muft alway
rerurne to this principle,That the wrath of God refteth vpon all me,
fo long as they continue ro be (mners. That hath Efay excelletly wel
Efa. 59. ^'^^ ^"' '" ^'^^^'^ wordes:The hand of the Lord is not ftiortnedjthat he
7. is not able to faue;nor his eare dulled that hcca notlicarc : but your
iniqui-
• The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. - 30^
iniquities haue made difagreemet berwenc you & your God,& your
(innes haue hidden his face from you tharhe heareth you no: . We
hcare chac finne is the diuiGon betwcne man & God, & the turningc
away of Gods face from the finner.Neither can it otherwife be.For it
isdifagrceiiiTg fio his rightcoufnes to haue any fclJowfhip with finne.
Wherfore the Apoftie teachctli that man is enemy to God till he be p^^^^
reftDrciioro fauoor by Chrirt. Whom therfore the Lord receiuerh jj.
iritfjijpyntnge with him,himhc is fayd to iuftifiecbecaufe he can nei-
ther recciitc him mto fauour nor ioync him with himfelfc, buthc
•muft of a Gntiermake |-vim righteous. And we further fay^thatthis is
doneby thfe forgiacnefle of finncs. For if they whom the Lord hath
reconciled to himfc Ife be iudged bv their wbrkes, they (halbe found
Qiil finncrs mdeede, whoyetmuft be free & cleane from frnne. It is
cvt^in^jthirfore that they whom God embraceih,are noothtrwil^
made rigbceous.but becaufc they are cleanfed by hading the fpottes
.of their 6rines wiped away by forgiuenes , that luch a righteoufnelTe
may inione word be called the forgiuenes of finnes.
. ftii j .'Both^thcfe arc moft clerely to be fecne by thcfe words of Paul,
which t haue already alleaged ; God was in Chrift rcconcilmge rhe ]' °^ ^
Avorld.to himfelfe,notimputmg their finnes to man, & he h.ith left i.Cor.j
#(vi.^ ystheword ofreconciliatio.And then he addeth tlie fumme of »»•
his .wed'agCjthat him which knew no fiime he made (Tnne for vj,that
W£ roight b.e made thenghteoufncsof God in him. Here he namcth
xighfteodhcfle and reconciliation without difference , that we n^ay
pcrcciuc tharihe one is mutually contained vndcr the other. And iie
tcacheth the manner to atraine this righteoufnefl'e to be when out
iinneS'.ire not imputed vnto vs .' Wherfore dout thou not hereaf-
ter how Goddoth luftihe vs,when thou hearcff that he doth rtfcon-
cilevs to hirofelfe by not imputing finnes. So to y Romaines he pto- Ro 4.^
vcth byrthe teftimony of Dauid,ihat righteoufnts is imputed to man
Without workeSjbccaufc Dauid pronounceth the m.-n bl< fled whofc
iniqmtii^s arc forgiuc:n,whofe finncs are coucred, to whom the Lo; d
haili not imputed hisoffenfes. Without dout by bleflednes he there
meaneth ri^lucoufnefle . As fith he affirmeth the fame 'o ftandc in
the forgiueneflc of finncSjthere is no caufe why we fliould oTherwife
define ii.Thcreforc Z-^chnrie the father of lohn the Baptift finget h
thatrheknowledjeoffaluatio confifteth in the forgiuenes of finnes. ^""^ '•
Whichrule Pauiefollowinqe in his Sermon which he made to the
Antiochians concerning e the fummc offaluatioPjasLuke rcporteth
it, concluded in this manertby him foniiucnes of finnes is preached ^f ' ^'
Vmoyou,& cucry one tliat belcuah in him is iuft!fitd from all thcfc '
1- Q^L'j
Gap.ii. . Ofthettianerhowtoreceiue
ihnv^SjPro v^-ye could not be luilihcd in rhe taw of Mofes.TIic Apo-
ftle to knitccth the forgiuencs of finncs with f ighteoufneSjy he (hc-
weth y they be both all one. Whcrupo he rightfully rcafoneth y the
righteoufnes is^ freely giuen vnto vs,which we obtaine by the lowing
kindnes of God.Neuher ought it to feme a ftragc vnufcd fpeach,that
the faiihful are righteous before God,not by workes,but by free ac-
ceptatio: hch both it is fo ofc found iny Scrip ture>& the old authors
>e ci- alfo do fomtimc fo fpeakc.For Auguftjn faith thus in one placc;Thc
lit.dei. lighrebufncs of the faintes in this world ftadeth rather in forgiuencs
k^ 2u of finneSjtha in perfedion of vertues. Wherwith agreeth the notable
n cant*, fentcces of Bernard : Not to finne is the righteoufnes of God.bui f
ki. 32. righteoufnes of man,isthe merciful kindcnes of God.He had before
affirmed that Chnft is to vs righteoufnes in abfolution, and cherforc
that they only are righteous that haue obtaihed pardon by mercy,
f 2'^' Herupo'alfo foUoweth this,that by the only meaiie of Chriftes
lighteouiheSjWe obtain to be luftified before God.Wiiich is afmucfa
in efted as if it were faid,y ma is not righteous in himfelfjbut becaufc
the nghceoafnes of Chnft is by imputatio enterpartened with him,
, which thing is worthy to be heedefully marked. For y tnflingc crrour
vanifheth awayjto fay y ma is therfore iuftified by faith^becaufe faith
. taketh part of the Spirit ot God by which he is made riohteous,which
is fo cotrary to the dodrine aboue taught, y they can neuer be made
to agree together. For it is no dout y he is void of his own rightccuf-
r.Cor. neSjy is taught to feke righteoufnes without himfelfe.This the Apo-
).2i. ftlc iiffirmeth mcft plainly when he writetli y he which knew no finn^
was made For vs a propitiatory facrifice to cleanfe away finne,that wc
might be made the righteoufnes of God in him. You fee y our righ-
teoufiKS is net in vs but in Chrift, & y it belongech ro vs only by this
iule,becaufe we be partakers of Chrift, becaufe we poflefle all his ri-*
I0.8 J. chefl'e with him. And it makcth nothing to the contrary y in an other
place he teacheth,y (inne was condened of finne inthe flcfli of Chrift,
that therighteoufncfle of the law might be fullilled m vs ; where he
meaneth no other fulfillingc,buty which we obtaine by imputation.
For the Lorde Chrift doth in fuch fort comunicate his righteoufnes
with vSjihac afttr a certaine maruellous mancr, he poureth the forca
therof into vs,fo much as pcrtaineth to the ludgement of God. ft ap-
^6m.(J. peareth that he did no otherwife meanc, by ^ other fefitecc which h*
9' had fpokcnalitie before: As by the difobedieccof one man we were
made finners,fo by the obedience of one ma we arc luftificd Wliat is
It elfe to fei our righteoufnes in y obedience of Chrift,but ro affi.'md
that hereby only we are accopt^dnchteous, becaufc the obediece of
Chrift
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. - . 307^
Chrift is imputed vnco vs as if it were our owne?Tiierfore me tliinkes ti. 2d
that Ambrofe hath cxcelletly well fhewed how there is an example ^^^- ^
of this righteoufnes in the blefling of lacob.For as lacob hauing not ^'^^^ ^
of himfclfc deferued the prceminency of the hrll begotten fonne,
hid himfelfc in the apparel of his brother, & being clothed with his
brothers cote y fauored of a molt fwete fmelljhe crept into y fauour
of his father,& receiucd the blelTing to his owne commodity vnder
the pcrfon of an other : fo we do lie hidde vnder the precious pure-
nes of Chrift our elder brother,that we may get a teftimony of righ-
teoufnes in V (isht of God.The words of Ambrofe are thefe: Wheras
Ifaac fmelc the fauour of the g3rmentes,paraduenture this is meant
therby,that we ate not iuftified by workes but by faith.becaufe flclh-
ly wcakenes hindreth workes,but the brightnes of faith which meri-
tcth forgiuenes of finnes, ouerfliadoweth theerrourofdeedes. And
trucly fo it is. For, that we may appeare before the face of God vnto
faluation, it is neceflary for vs,to fmell fweetely with his odour, and
to haue our faultes couered and barred with his perfcdion.
The xij. Chapter*
ThaXi to the end v ve may be fully ptrfv vaded of the free iti(lifcationj v ve mttji lift
vp our m.ndes to the ittdgeynent feate of God,
ALthough itappeareth by mofteuident teftrmonies, that all
thefe thinges are true, yet we {hall not clearly perceiue how
neceffary they be, vntiJl we haue fet before our eyesthofe
things y ought to be the grounds of all this difputation. Firft
therefore let vs remember this,that we puipofe not to fpeake of the
tighteoufnefle of a worldly iudicial court,butof the heauenly iiidge-
ment fcate:that we fliould not meafure by our owne fmall portio, by
what vprightnes of workes Gods iudgcment may be fatisfied . But ic
is maruelous to fee with what ralhnes & boldnes it is commonly de-
bated.Yea & it is to be feenc how none do more boldly or with fuller
mouthes(as the faying is)prate of rhe righteoufnes of workes, than
they y are either monftruoufly ficke of open outward difeafes,or be
ready to burft with inward viccs.That cometh to pafle becaufe they
thmke not vpon the righteoufnes of God,whereof if they had neuer
fo litle feelinge,they would neuer make fo great a mockery of it. And
truely it is out of meafure lightly regarded, when it is not acknowlcd-
ged to be fuch & fo pcrfed that nothingbe imputed vnto it but cuery
way whole & abfolute,& defiled with no vncleannefl*e:fuch as neuer
was & neuer fhall be able to be founde in man. It is in deede ea(ie and
ready for euery man in Schooles to talke vainely vpon the worthinc$
pf workes to iuihtie men.But when they come into the fight of God,
Cap. 1 2 . Of the mancr how to rccciuc
fuch dalliances muftauoidejbecaufe there is earneft doing vfed, andl-
no trifling ftcife about vvords.To this,to this I fayjWC-muft apply our
mindejif we wil profitably enquire of true righteoufncsjhowwc may
anfwere the heauenly ludgc when he c.ilieth vs to accompc.Lette vs
thinke him to be a iudge,not fuch a one as our owne vndcrftandings
do oFthemfelues imagine : but fuch a one as he is painted out in the
Scriprure,with whofe brightncsthc ftarres llialbe darkenedyby whofe
ftrength the hils do melt awayjby whofe wrath the earth is fhaken,
by whofe wifdom the wife are taken in their futtelty,by whofe pure-
neife all things are proucd vnpurc,whofe righteoufncfl'e the Angels
arc not able to bearCjwhich maketh the innocent not innocet,whofe
vengeance when it is once kindled pcarceth to the bottomc of hel.lf
he(I fay)(it to examine mens doingc'S,\vho (hall appeare afliired bc-
' ^ * fore his throne? vvho fhall dv/ell with a deuouringe fier?{iiyth the Pto-
phct. Who (hall abide with continual! burningcs ? he that walketh in
rigliteoufncffes & fpeaketh tructh,&c.But let fuch a one come forth,
whatfoeuer he be. But that aunfwere maketh , that none commeth
forth, For this terrible faying foundeth to the contrary: Lord if thou
fa. 130 maikeiniquiticSjLordc'jwhoflial abide it? tr^iely all mnft needesim-
mcdiaily perilh , as it is wrytten in an other ploce:Shail man be lufti-
fied if he-be compared with God, or fliall he be purer tha his maker?
Beholde they th»t ferue him are not faithful,and he hath found per*
uerfnes in his Angels. How much more fhal they that dwel in houfes
of clay,& that haue an earthly fundation,be confumed with morhes?
they (lialbe cut downc from the morninpe to the tucning Beholde a-
monge his Snintes there is none faithfull , and the heauens are not
cleane in his fightrhow much more is man abhominable and vnpro*
fitablejwhich driiiketh iniquity as waierJT graunt in dcde that in the
booVe of Icbjis mention made of a righteoufnefifc that is Hicr than
the kecpioe ofthe law. And it is good to vnderftand this d'.ftinftion:
becaufe .tlthou^h a man did facisHc the law,yet he could not fo ftand
to the triall oFthac nghteoufnefle that palT. th all fenfes . Therefore
although lob be cleare in his ownc conlciencejyet he is smafed, and
not able to fpeake becaufe he fceih that very angelikc holincffe can
not appeafe God , if he exadly weye their workes . But I therefore
will at this time ouerpafTe thstrighteoufncfle which Ihauefpoken
of, becaufe it is iricomprehen^ble : but only this I fay, that if our life
be examined by the rule ofthe wrvrten law^we are more than fenfe-
'ks if fo many curfes whcrwith the Lord hath willed vs to be awaked
)eu i7 ^^ "^^' torment vs with horrible fc3rc,& amongc other this gcncr.ill
,6. curfcjCurfed is eucry one that doth not abide in all the thinges that
arc
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. ' 308
arc wrytten in the booke . Finally all this difcourfe ^halbc but vrifa-*
uoiy and coldjvnkffe cuery man yelde himfelfe gilty before the hea-
Uenly iudge, and wilUngly throw downe and abace himfelfe, bcingc
carcfull how he may be acquired.
1 To this,to this I fay, we fliould hauc lifted vp our eieSjto Icarnc
rather to tremble for fcarc, than vainly to rcioife. It is in deede ealie,
fo long as y copaiifon extendeth no further than men,for eucry man
-lothinkchimfelftohaue fomwhat which other ou^^ht not to defpile.
But when we rife vp to haue refpc(3: vnto God than fuddenly y con-
iidece folleth to the ground & commeth to nought. And in the fame
cafe altogether is our foule in refped of God,as mans body is in re-
fpe<S of the henuen.For the fight of the eie,fo long as it c6:«nueth in
vowing things that lie nerc vnto it,doth (hew of what pcarcing force
it iSjbut if it be once directed vp to the funne,then being daftled and
<lulled with the too great bnghtnes therof, it fcleth no lefle feblenes
of it felfe in beholding of the funne,tha it perceiued ftrength m be-
holding inferiour things. Therfore let vs not deceiue our fclucs with
vaine confidence , although we compt our felucs either egall or fu-
pcriour to other men:but that is nothing to God, by whole will this
knowledge is to be tried. But if our wildcnes can not be tamed with
thefe admonitions, he will anfwere to vs as he fayd to the Pharifeesj
you be they that iufti fie your felues before me:but that which is hie
to men is abhominable to God . Now go thy way and proudly boaft Luk itf
of thy rightcoufrtes among men , while God from hcauen abhorretb 1 5.
it.But whit fay the feruauntes of God that are truely inftruded with
his Spiritf'Enter not into iudgcment with thy feruant , becaufe euery pfai.^ j
liuing man fhal not be iuftified in thy fight An other fayth,although a.
in fomewhat diuerfe meaning.Man can not be righteous with God:if Iob.^,8
he Will contende with him , he (hall not be able to anfwere one for a
thoufand.Here we now plaincly hcare what is the lighteoufnelTe of
God,eucn fuch as can be fatisfied with no workes of men , to whom
■when it examineth vs of a thoufande offrnfes, we can not purge our
felues of one. Such a righteoufnes had that fame chofeniuftrument
of God Paule concciued , when he profcfT d that he knew himfelfe »Cor.
^ilty in nothing,but that he was not thereby iuftified. ^'^'
J And not only fuch exaples are in the holy Scriptures, but alfo
all godly wryters do (hcwe that they were alway of this minde . So
Auguftine fayth. All the godly that grone vndcr this burden of cor- Ad Bo.
rupnble flclli, and in this weakenelfe of life haue this only hope that nif.lib,|
we haue one mediarour Icfus Chrift the righteous , and he is the ap-; *^*P'^
pealemcnt for pur finnes. What favth he?If this be their only hopc^
.-. . . QC^uij
Cap.i2. Ofthcmanerhowtoreceiue
where is the confidence ofwofkes? For when he calleth it only. He
;„per leaueth none other. And Bernard fayth. And in deede where is fafa
an.fer . & ftedfaft reft & alTurcdnes for the weake,but in the woudes of the
'»• Sauiour?& fo much the furer I dwell therm as he is mightier to fauc.
The world rageth,the body burdeneth, the deuil licth in waite.Ifall
notjbecaufe I am buildcd vpon the fure rocke. I hauc finned a gric*
uous finne,my confcicnce is troubled,buj it (hal not be ouertrobled»
becaufe I ihall remember the woundes of the Lord. And hereupon
afterward he concludeth: Therefore my merite is the Lords takmge
n pral. of mercy , I am not vtierly without mente, Co long as he is not with-
jui ha- out mercies.But if the mercies of the Lord be many,thcn I alfo hauc
?'"'^ as many merites.Shallfingmine owne righceoufneffes ?Lordl wiJl
remeber only thy rightcoufnes . For that is alfo my righteoufhes, for
he is made vnto me righteoufncs of God. Againc in an other place,
.n cant, -pj^-^ ^^ ^ whole merite of man, if he put his whole hope in him that
faueth whole ma.Likewjfe where retaming peace to himfelfe he lea^
ueth the glory to God.To thee(rayth he) let glory remains vnmini-
(hedrit llialbe well with me, if I haue peace. I forfwerc glory altoge-
ther, leaft if I wrongfully take vpo me that which is not mine owne,
I loofe alfo y which is offred me. And more plainly in an other place
he fayth:Why iKould the church be careful of merites,which hath a
forer & iafer way to glory vpon the purpofe of God ? So there is no
caufc why thou fliouldeft aske , by what meritcs we hope for good
ire. i6. things/pecially when thou hcarcft in the Prophet,! wil do it,not for
I a- & your fakes, but for mine own f}ke,fayth the Lord.Itfufficeth for me-
l** rite,to know that mcrites fuffice not. But as it fufficeth for merit not
to prcfume of merites , Co to be without merites fufHccth to iudge-
ment. Wheras he freely vfeth this word Mtriies for good workes,\vc
muft therein beare with the culiome.But in the end his purpofe was
to make hipocntes afnyd , that wildly range with licennoufnefTe of
finning againft the grace of God. As afterward he cxpoundcth him*
fclfe,faying: Happy is the Church that neither wareih merites with-
out prefumption,nor preiumption without merites.lt hath whereu-
pon to prefume, but not merites. It hath merites, but todefcrue not
to prefume. Is not the very not prcfuming a deferuing .^ Therefore it
prefum'>th fo much the more boldly , becaufe it prefunieth not, ha-
uing large matter to glory vpon,euen the many mercies of the Lord.
4 This is the trueth . The cxercifed confciences pcrcciuc this to
be the onely fanduary offafety , wherein they may fafcly reft ihem-
felues when ihey haue to do with the ludgemcnt of God . for if the
Statres that Teemed nioft bright in the night fcafon^ do loofe their
/ brighines
The grace of Chrift. Lib.5. 30^
brightneffe with (ightof y funne^what thinkc wc /hall become euto
of the rareft innocencie of man j when it (halbe compared with the
purcneifc of God ? For that Ihalbe a mod feucrc examination, that
{hall pearce into the moft hidden thoughtes of the heart , and ( as
Paule faith) ihallreuele the fecretesofdarkncffes.and difclofe the i Cor.
hidden tiiingcsof the heart, which fhall compel! the lurking and 4-5.
vnwiJling confcience to vtter all thinges chat now arc fallen out of
remembrance. The Dcuell our accufer will prcffe vs , which is priuie
to all the wicked deedes that he hath moued vs to do. There thc^
outward pompous (hewes of good workes which now onely are eftc-
med , (hall nothing profit vs. Onely the purenelfe of will ihalbe re-
quired. Wherefore the Hypocrifie,not onely whereby eueryman
knowing himfelfe gihy before God defireth to boft himfelfe before
inen,but alfo wherewith cuery man deceiueth himfelfe before God
(as we be all inclined to ftroke and flatter our felucs)fhall fall downc
confounded, howfocueritnow be proudc with more than dronkcn
boldnelTe.They that bend not their wit to fuch a fight,may in deedc
for a (hort time fwetely & pleafantly frame a righteoufnes to them-
fclues,bui it is fuch a righteoufnefle as (halbe by and by lliaken away
from them at the iudgcment of God: like as great richefle heaped
vp in a dreame do vanilli away from men when they awake.But they
tbatlhall carneftly as it were in the fight of God,enquirc of the true
ruleof righteoufneilcjlliall certainly finde that all the woikcs of mc,
if they beiud^cJ by their owne worthines, are nothing but dcfilings
and Hlthincifetthat that which among the common people is ac-
comptcd righteoufneffe, is before God mere wickednefle: that that
which IS iudged puritie , is vndennefle ; that that whicj^ is reckcned
glorie, is but Ihame.
, 5 From this beholding of the pcrfedion of God,let it not greuc
vs to defcend to loke vpon our felues without fljtterie or blinde af-
fedio of loue.For it is no maruell if we be all fo blinde in this behalf,
fbrafmuchas none ofvs doth beware of the peftilenttenderncflTc
toward himfelf,which (as the Scripture crieth out)naturally fticketh
faft in vs all. To euery man (faith Salomon) his owne way is right in Pto.tt,
his owne eyes. Againe. All the waycs of man feme cleane in his owne i.& it,
cycs.But what? Is he acquiied by this blindnefle? No. But (as he fur- *•
ther faith in the fame place) the Lord weyeth the heartes, that is to
fay, while man flattereth himfelfe by reafon of the outwarde vifor of
righteoufneffe that he beareth m refemblance , in the meanc time
the Lordtwith his balance examineth the hidden vndennes of the
heart. ThertCore iith we fo nothing proHt with fuch fiatterieSjlct vf
Cap,
.12. Of the mancr how to rcceiue
noc wilfully mocke our fciues to our ownc deftrudion. But that we
may trie our felues rightly ,we muft neceflanly call back our cofcience
to the ludgement feate of God. For we do altogether neede his light
lodifclofe the fecrec foldinges of our peruerfhefle, which otherwifc
Le too depely hidden. For then, and neuer till then, we fliall clerely
percciue what is meant hereby : that man being rottenneffe aild a
worme, abhominable and vaine,which drinketh wickcdnes as water
jb 15. ^^ far from bemgiuftified before God. For who (houlde make that
6. deane that is coniceiued of vncleane (cede? not one man. Then {hall
)b»i4. we alfo hnde that by experience,which lob faid of himfclfc:lf I will
go about to (hew my felfe innocent , mine owne mouth (hall con-
^ demnc me : if I will (hewe my felfe righteous,ic will proue me wicked;
For that is not meant of one age oncly , but of all ages , which the
fa.53. Prophet in old time complained of Ifracljthat all went aftray Uke
• fliepCjthat euery one turned afide to his owne way. For he there c6-
prehedeth all them,to whom the grace of redemption (hould come.
And the rigoroufnefle of this examination ought to procede fo tar,
till It fubdue vs , fo that we be fully throwen downe withall , and by
that meane prepare vs to receiue the grace of Chrift. For he isde-
cejucd that thinkcth himfclfe able to receiue the enioying of this
grace, vntill he haue firft thrown downe all hawtines of minde.Thif
Pet. 5. is a knowcn faymg : that God confoundeth the proude , and geuetb
grace to the humble.
6 But what way is there to humble our relacs,but that we being
altogether needy and empty jihould geuc place to the mercy of God?
For I do not call it humblenelfc^f we thinke that we haue any thin?
remaining with vs. And hetherto they haue tauglit a very hurtefull
hypof rifie,' hat haue Joined thefe two things together, that we muft
thinke humbly of our felues before God, & that we muft make fome
accompt of our owne righteoufnefie.For if we confefle to God con-
traiie to our owne thinking, we do wickedly he vntohim : but we
can not thinke as we ought , but that by and by all that femeth glo-
rious in vs muft be trod en vnder footc. Therfore when thou heareft
^fa. iS. in the Prophet,that there is prepared faluation for the humble peo-
^8» ple,andabaccmenrforthc eyes of the wicked: Fn ft thinke,that there
is no entrie open to Oaluaiion , vntill thou haue layed away all pride
and taken to thee perfed humblenefle : then, that the fame humble*
nelle is not a certame modefty whereby thou gcucft ouer to the Lord
a heare bredch of thine ownc right, as they are called humble before
men that do neither prefumptuoufly aduaunce themfelufs , nor re^
'prochfully triumph ouer other, although they ftand vpon fome efti-
mation
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 310
mation of their owne excellence: but an vnfained rubmilTlon ofz
tninde throwen downe with fehng of his owne miferie and ncdinellc;
Foritisfocchewhercdercribed in the wordc of God. When the
Lorde faith thus in Zcphanias:! will t;ike away out of thee him that 7.epha,
ourragiouilyreioileth, and IvviUleaue in the roiddesof thee the af- ?•**•
Aided man , and the proorc man , and they Ihall truft in the Lorde:
doth he not there plamelyfhevve who be humble? eucnthey that lie
afflided with knowledge of their owne pouertie. On the other fide
he callerh the proude j outragious reioifers , becaufe men loyin? m
profpcritie are wont to reioife without meafure. But to the humble
whom he purpofetb ta faue, he leauech nothing but to irurt m the
Lorde. And likewife ll is faid in Efaye ; Whom (hall 1 looke vnto, but Efa.i^
to the poore and contrite in fpirit , and him that feareth my wordes? ^
Aeaine: The hie and excellent,that inhabiteth eternitie,his name is ^■57»
holy, that dwclleth on hie > and in the holy place, and with the con-
trite and humble fpirit, to quicken the fpirit of the humble and the
heart of the contrite. When thou fo oft heareft the name of contri-
tton,vnder{ljnd thereby the wound of the heart, that fuffrethnota
man throwen downe on the ground to rife againe . With fuch con-
trition ought thy heart to be wounded,if thou wilt according to the
(aying of God be aduaunced with the humble. If that be no' done,
thou ihalt be broughtlowe with the mighty hande of God to thy
(hame and dif_;r3cemcnt.
V 7 And our beftSchoolemaifter thinking It not enough to fhcwc
it out in v/of des , hath alfo fet out vmo vs in a parable the image of
true hunv.liueas in a painted table. For he bringech forth a Publicanc Luc.i 9,
that landing a far bf,not daring to lifte vp his eyes to heauen , with 'i*
much k.nocking his breft prayeth in this wife : Lorde be mercifull to
me a hnner.Lct vs not thinke theie ro be tokens of fained modeftie,
that he dare not loke vp to heauen , nor to come nercr , that with
knocking his breft he confcfTeth himfelfe a (inner ; but let vs know
that they bee teftimonies of inward aftedion. On the other fide he
fetteth the Pharifce, which ihankcth God that he is not of the com-
mon forte of men, either an opprcfler, or an vnrighteous man , or an
adulterer , bycaufe he fafted twife on the Sabbat , and gaue tithes o^
all that he pofTcfTed. He doth with open cofeflion acknowledge that
the righteoufnelTe which he hath is the gift of God ; but bycaufe he
ftandeth in confidence that he is righteous , he departeth from God
vnfauored &in hatred. The Publicane by acknowledging of his own
wickednelfe is iuftified. Hereby we may fe, howc great is the eftima-
lion of our humbling vs before God : fo that the heart can not be
Cap.i 2. Of the maner how to rcceluc
open to receiuc hismercie ,vnlelleitbcfirft voideofaliopinionof
his ownc worthinelfc . When this opinion hath pofiefled the place,
it ihuttethvptheway for Gods mercie to enirc. And that no man
fhould doubtc hereof ,Chrift was fent of his father into the earth
with this conimiffion,to bring glad tidings to the poore,to healc the
>f. - contrite in heart, to preach hbertje to the captiue, and deiiuerancc
* to them that were (hut vp in prilon , & to cofort them that mourne:
togeue them glorie forafhcs, oyle for mourninge , the robe of
iit.u. praifc for the fpirit offorrowe. According to this commiffion , he
*• caileth none but them that labour and are loden to take part of his
^^^ liberalitie . And in an other place he faitli : 1 came not to call the
'* righteous, but finners.
8 Therefore if we will gcuc place to the calling of Chriftjct all
arrogancy & carelefncfl'e depart far away from vs. Arrogacy groweth
<^afoolifh perfuafion of our owne righteoufneffejwhcn a manthin-
keth himfelfe to haue fomwhat,by the defer uing whereof he may be
commended before Godjcarelelheffe may be euen without any per-
fuaiio of workes.Formany finner$,becaufe being dronke with Iwetc-*
neffe of vices they thinke not vpon the iudgement of God , lie as ic
were fenflcfly amafed with a difeafe of droufinefTejthat they afpirc
not to the mercie offred them. But v/e muit no leffe fhake of fuch
dull fluggifhneCTejihan we muft caft away all vain? confidence of ouc
felues, that we may without encombrance haften to Chrill , that wc
being empty and hungry may be filled with his good things. For wc
Ihall neuer fufficiently hauc truft in him,vnleflc we vtterly diftruft of
our felues , we iliall neuer fufficiently raife vpour courages in him,
vnleffe they be firft dirovven downe in our felues.We (hall neuer fuf-
ficiendy haue confolation in him , vnlefie we be fifft defolate in our
felues. Therefore we be then mete to take hold of and obtainc the
fauour of God, calling away all truft of our felues, but trufting vpon
>ever- the onely aflfuredncfle of hisgoodnefTe , when (as Augulhne faith)
tis A forgetting our owne deferuings.we embrace the giftes of Chrift. Bc-
I** g caufe if he fought deferuings in v$, we (liould not come to his giftes,
icrmo. Wherewith Bernard very well accordeth, comparing proude men to
y. in vnfaithfull feruantes, that arrogandy daimc any thing be it neuer fo
«n, litle to their owne deferuings : becaufe they do wrongfully keepc to
themfelues the praife of grace paffing by them,as if a wall would fay
that it bringetn forth the funbeame which it receiueth through a
window But,nor to tary longer herevponjlet vs take a fliort but a ge-
neral! andfure rule, that he is prepared to take parte of the frutes of
Gods mercie ,that hath vtterly emptied himfelfe , I will not fay of
ri§ht?o-e
The grace of Chrift. ; Lib.3. 311
tishtcoufnelfcjwhich is none at all,but of tlie vainc and windic image
of nghteoufnes. Becaufe euery roan fo much hindercth his receiuing
bf the liberabtie of God as he rcfteth in himfelfe.
The xiij. Chapter, '
That there are ti/vo things to be marked in free tH^ificatien,
ANd here are alway two things to be principally loted vnto:
that is to fay,that there may remainc to the Lorde his gloric
vnminilhedjand as it were wholly and perfcdly mainteincd,
aild to our confcicnces an vntroubled quictncffe and caJnae
tranquilitie before his iudgement. We fee how oft and how earneft-
]y the Scripture exhorteth vs , to geue onely to God a confcflion of
praifejwhen we entreate of righteoufncs. And the Apoftlc teftifietb, Rom. j,
that this was the Lordes principall purpofe ofgeuingvs righteouC- 15.
nefl'e in Chrift , that he might iTiewe his ownc righteonfnefTe. And
what a Ihewmg that fhould be , he dcclarcth immediatly after; that
is, if he alone be knowen to be righteous, and that luftiHed him that
is of the faith of lefus Chrift. Thou IJbcft that therighteoufneflc of
God is not fuflicietly fet out, vnlefle he alone be accompted rightc^
ou5 , and do communicate the grace of rightcoufnefle to them that
/deferue it not. By this meane he will haue euery mouth to be ftopl
ped,and the whole World to be made fubieft to him. For while man
haih any thing to fpeake in his owne defence, folongc there is fomci
what taken away from the glory of God.So in E^echiel he teacheth Ezct**
howemuchwe glorifie hisname by rcknoweledgmgof o'urowne/4»»
wickedncfle. -Youihallremember ((aycthhe) the wayes and all the
wicked doingcs wherewith ye haue bene deHIed. And ye {hall be
difpleafed with your felues in your owne fight , in all the euels that
ye haue committed. And ye ihall knowe that I am the Lorde , when
I Oiall do good to you for mine owne names fake, and not according
to your moft wicked offences. If thefe thinges be conteined ih thd
true knowledge of God , that we being broofed with knowledge of
our owne iniquicie , fhould confider that he doth good to vs wheri
Bs we be vnworthy therof;why then do we to our great hurt attempt
to fteale away from the Lorde any parcell be it neucr fo fmall of the
praifc of his free goodneffe ? Like wife leremie when he crieth outjlere.^*
Let not the wife man gloric in his wifdome , or the riche man in hii » j.
richefle, or the ftrong man in his ftrength , but let him that glorictb,
glorie in the Lorde : dorh he not there declare that fomcwhat is di-
minifhed from Gods gloric, if man gloric in him felfe ^ To this pur«
Gap.i 3- , " Gf the maner howxo rccciuc
i.Cor. pofe trutly doth Paulc apply thole wordes , when he teacheth that
**J°* all the partes of our faluation are repofe d in Chrift , that we fhoiilde
not glory but in the Lord. For his meaning is that he rifeth vp agamft
God and darkencth his glorie, whofoeuer thinkerh that he haih any
thing be it neuer fo iitlc of his owne.
z This is the truth , we neper truely glorie in him, vnleffe we be
vtterly put from our own glory. On the other {itle,this is to be holdc
for a catholike principle , that all they gioiic^gaJnliGod that glonc
fCom. 1. in them felues,For Paule iudgeth that onely by thisme-methe world
' 5- is made fubied to God , when ail matter to glorie,Y[ton is vtterly ta-
E a. 45- ^^^ fj.Q^ men. Therefore Efaye,when he declareiirthat Ifrael fliall
hauc their iuftificatio in God.faith alfo that they thai there alfo haue
their prayfe : as though he rtiould fay , that the Loi de to this.endi
iuftifieth the eled that they fliould glorie in him and m nothing els*
But howe we ought to be praifcd in the Lordc , he had lauiht in the
vcrfe next before : that is, that we fhould fweare that our righteouf+
nellcs and ftrength are in the Lorde.Not that there is not required a
bare confcllion , but confirmed with an othe, that a man fliould rot
thinke that he lliallibedifcbargcd with J wore not what famed humj*
liticAnd let no man here allege for excufe , that he doth not glonc
when without arrogance he reknowledgcth his owne rightcouihclfc;
for there can be no incheft>mation but it enuendrerh confidence^
por confidence but it bredcth glorie. Therfbre let v s remember that
in all the difput-atJon oftigbteoufnefle wemuit ijaue regard to this
4,1. cnde,that the praifethereofremaine with thcLovd wliorleandper-
Rom. J. fed. Foras much as for declaration of his rigbteoufncfle (as the A-*
^^j' poftle teftifieth) he hath poured out his grace vpon vs,that he mi^-ht
tph'.i I ^ iull and iuftifyihg hirti that is of the faith of Chriii. Wherefore in
;*in other place,vvhcn he had taught that the Lorde gauc vs faluation,
*o fet out th^ glopie of hfs name , afterward as it were repctinq the
lame thing he addeth : ye are faued by grace and by the gift of God,
hot by workes, that none fhould glorie. And when Peter telleth that
we are called vnto hope of faluation that we fliouldc declare the
powers of him that hath called vs out of darkencile into hismaruc*
lous lightjWithout doubt his meaning is fo to make the onely praifei
of God to found in the earcs of the faithfull ,.thai they Ihouid with
^ i depe filcnceopprefle all arrogancie of the flefli.ln a fummc,man can
. nor without robbery of God chalenge to him felfe any one crum of
righteoufnede : becaufe euen fo much is plucked and taken away
from the glorie of Gods righteoufneffe.
. . J Now if we af kc by what rneanc the confcicncc may be quited
before
The grace of Chrift. Lib.;, 311-
btforc God,we fliall finde no other meanc but if fred cightcoufncfTc
be gcucn vs by the gift of God.Lct vs alway think vponthis faying of
Salomon,Who lliail fay;I haue cleanfed my heart, I am made clcane pro.xo.
from my finne ? Trudy there is no man that (liall not be oucrwhel- 9.
med with infinite fihhinefle. Therefore let euen the perfeftcft man
defcende into h:s owne confcience.and call his doinges to accompct
what cnde fhall he haue ? Shall he fwctely reft as though all t hinges
were in good order betwenc him and God?and (hall he not rather be
vexed with terrible torments^when he iliail felc matter of damnation
abiding in him feire if he be iudgcd according to his workes ? The
confcience,if itloke vpon God.muft of neceflitic either haue alTurcii.
peace with his iudgement , or be befeged with the terrours of hell«s
Therfore we proiit nothmg in difputing of righteoufneffe vnlelTc wc
ftabhfh fuch a righteoufneflejWith the ftcdfaftneffe wherof our foulc
may be ftaycd in the iudgement of God. When our foule (hall haue r "
whereby it may both without feare appeare before the face of God,/ ' "^
and rcceiue his iudgement , vnfliaken , then and not till then let vs
knowc that we haue found an vnfained righteoufneffe Therfore not
without caulethe Apoftle ftandeth fo muchypon this point , with- Fom.4,
whofe wordcs I had rather exprelfe it than with mine own. If (faith '*•
be) the promifc of inheritance be of the law, faith is made voide,thc
promife is made abohllied.He firft infcrreth that faith isdifanuUed Sc
made voide if the promifTe of righteoufneffe haue refped to the dc-
feruings of our works,or do hang vpon the kcping of the law, For fo
could neuer any man afluredly reft in itibecaufe it could neuer come " '
to pafTc that any man might afluredly determine with him felf that he
had fatisfied the law, as in deedc neuer any man doth by works fully
fatisfie it.Whereof that we fhould not neede to feke far for teflimo-
nics to proue it , cuery man may be a witncffe to him felfe that will
with a right eye behold himfclfc. And herby appearcth,in how depc
and darkc corners hy pocrifie buried the mindes of men , while they
£0 carelcfly beare with themfelues,that they ftick not to fet their own
flatteries againflthe iudgement of God,as though they would binde • .1
to a ftay ol his iudiciall proceding, but the faithfull that do fincerely V
CKaminc them felues,are greued and tornjcntcd with a far other man- ' \
ner of carefulneffe.Therfore there ihould fo enrre into all mindes a
doubting.and at length a very defpeire where eche man for him fclfc
ftiould make accompt,wiih bow great a burden of det he is ftill ouer-
prefTed^nd how far he is from the codition wherwith he is charged.
Loe,hpw faith is by this meane already cxpreffcd and extinguifhed.
For to waucr > to varie } to be carried vp and downe , to fticke faft in
Cap.13. Ofthemanerhowtorcceiue
doubdngjto be Fiolden in fufpecejto ftagger,and at length to Jefpcirc,
is not to truft.'buc to ftrengthen thy mjnde with coftant certamtJC and
pcrted afruredncs,& to haue wherevpon to reft and fatten thy foocc.
4 He adioiheth alfo an other thing, that is,that the promife (hall
thereby be made oFno efted and voide. For if the fulHlhng thereof
do hang vpon our deferuingjwhen (hall we come thus farre as to de-*
ferue the bountifulnes of God? Alfo this fccond point hangeth vpcMi
the former: For the promife (hall not be fulfilled but to them that
beleue it.Thcrefore if faith be fallen, there fhal remaine no force of
the promiflejTherefore the inheritance is of faith jthat it may be ac-
cording to grace , to ftablifli the promife. For it is aboundanily well
ftabliflied when it retteth vpon the onely mercy of God : becaufe his
mercy & truth are with a perpetuall knot loined together, ihat is to
fay, whatfoeuer God mercifully promifeth, he alio faithfully perform
fa.n^ meth. So Dauid , before that he required faluation by the wordc of
Godjfirrt determineth the caufe thereof to be in his mercy. Let thy
mercies (faith he) come vnto me,thy faluaf /o according to thy wordit
And rightfully : bycaufe God is by no other meane perfwaded c6
make the promife,but of his owne mere mercie. Therefore wc muft
herein ftay , and deepely faften all our hope and not to looke to our
own worksite fekc any heipe of them And that you fbould not think
n Pfal. that I herein fpeake any new thing ; Auguftine doth alio teachethat
tacu" ^^ ought fo to do. Chrift f faith he) Ihall reigne for euer in his fer-i
riore. uantes , God hath promifed it , God hath faid it , and if that be not
enough , God hath fworne it . Therefore forafmuch as the promife
is itablifhed, not according to our deferuinges , but according to his
mcrcie,no ma ought to fpeake fearefully of that of which he can not
[n de doubte.Bernarde alfo faith ;Thc difciples of Chrift fay, Who cann<t
icar. [yQ faued? But he aunfwered : this is impoflible with mcnne, but it H
^"P ' not impoffible with God. This is all our confidence, this is our onely
comforte , this is the whole grounde of our hope , but being affured
of thepoffibilitie jwhat fay we of his will ? Who knoweth whether
ccIlT. he be worthy of loue or hatred?" Who hath knowcn the Lords mca**
'^: h»>!^? Or who hath bene his counfeller? Here now faith muft of nc-
'^^^' cefiitiehelpe vs,here muft his truth fuccourvs, that that which if
hidden from vs in the heart of the father , may be reueled by the
Spirit , and his Spirit teftifying it may perfwade our heartes that we
are the fonnes of God. And it may perfwade vs by caUing and iufti**
fying vs freely by faith, in which things there is as it were a certaine
meane paflage from the eternal predeftination to the gloric that is to
eome.Bnefely let vs thus conclude. The Scripture dcctarcih that the
promifes
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. . 313
promifcs of God are not ftablifted , vnlefle they betaken hold of
^vv'ith aifured afifi.ince of confcicnce :and wherefoeuer there is any
doubting or vnceriaintic it ptonounceth that they be voide. Againc
it pronounceth that they do nothing but ftagger and wauer if they
reit vpon our owne wyorkes. Therefore vvcmiift needcs either lofc
righteoufncffe , or we mud not conhdcr our ovvne worI;es, but onely
faith muft take place , whofe nature is this ; to lift vp her cares ^nd
fhut her eyes,that is to f3y,to be hedefully bent to the promile only,
and CO turne away her thought frc m all mans worthinclfe or defer-
uing. So I', that notable prophecie of Zacharie fulfiiicd ,ihat wl;en ^.ach.j.
the wickcdnes of the land fhaibe done away,3 man fhall call his frcnd ^'
vnder his vine and vnder his fi^ge tree^where the Prophet dccl.<rcih
thacy faithfulldonootherwifeenioy true peace but after obtcining
of the forgeueneflc of hnnes. For this cauelation is to be remem-
bred in the Prophetes , that when they fpcake of the kingdomc of
Chrift 5 they fet out the outward blcffinges ofGod as figures of the
fpirituall things. Whereupon Chrift is called both the king of peace V.Ot.9 <
and our peace , bccaufe he appeaieth all the troublefom motions of Ephc.t.
cofcience.If we feke by whatmeanchedoth it,vvemuftnecdes come ^^'
to the facnfice by which God is appeafcd.For helliall ncuer ccifc to
tremble for feare that fhall nor determine that God is appealed by
the onely fatisfadorie cleanfing wherin Chrift harh fullancd his
wrath. Finally peace is no where els to be fought for but in the ler^
rors of Chrift our rcdemer.
:: 5 Butwhy do I vie fodarke atcftimonJc?Paule eucry where de Rf^m. 5.
nicthjthat there is peace or quiet ioy left to confcienccs, vnltfle it be *•
determined that we be iuftified by f.;ith. And he therewithal! decla- •
reth whcnfc that afiurednes cometh, namely when the loue of God
i$ poured intoour hearresby thehoiy Gholt :as if he had laid ,that
ourconfcicnces can not otherwife be quieted, vnlefle we be cerremiy
perfuaded that we pleafe God.Whcreupon alfo in an other place he R-ouj $•
crierh out in the perfon of all tlic godly , Who fhall feuer vs from
the loue of God, which is in Chrift?- becaufe we fhall tremble eucn at
eucry htle breath > till we be arriued into the hauen : but wc flialbe
without care euen in the dai kenes of death, fo long as the Loi d lhi.-;ll ,
ihew him felfc a paflor to vs. Therefore -whofoeuer prate that we are Pia.i j.
iuftified by faith,bccaufe being regeneraie we arciuftby huing fpiri- +
tually :they neuer taftcd the Iwerenefte of grace ,toconfider that
God wil be merciful vnto themAVheruponaIfof6l'iowcth,rhu they
do no more know the manner of praying rightly , than Tuikes and
whatfoeucr other profane Nations.For (as Paulc wirncftcih) it is no
Sf.jiii Rl<
Cap. 1 4. . Of the mancr how to rccciuc
true faith vnleflTe it teache and put vsinminde of that moftfwete
nime of Fanher,yca vnleffe it open our mouth freely to crie out AbGa
father. Which in an other place he more plainely expreffeth, where
he faith that inChrift wchaue boUneiTe and enxrie in confidence
by the faith of him. Truly this cometh not to pafle by the gift of rc-
generation-.which as it ss alway vnperfecft in the flelh^fo it conteincth
in it fclf manifold matter of doming. Wherfore we muftof neccility
come to this remedy , that the faithful! (hould determine that they
may by no other right, hope for the inheritaunce of the heauenty
kmgdome , but becaufe being graflFed into the body of Ghrift they
are frely accompted nghreous.For as tottching iuftification,faith is 3
thing merely padiue^bringing nothing of our own to the recoucring
of the fauour of God,but receiuing of Chiift that which we want.
The xiiij. Chapter.
What it tht beginning ofittJiificathnjAnd the contwuall prfcedinges thereof.
■HHat the matter may be made more plaine, let vs fearch,what
mav be the riiihteournefre of man in the whole courfe of his
life : and let vs make fower degrees thereof. For men chhec
being endued with no knowledge of God, are drowned in
idolatrie ; or being entred into profcffion by facramentes , denying
God with vncleanntffe of hfcwhom they confeffe with moothjthey
are Chnfts no fuither tha in name or they be hypocrits,which coucr
the wuk?dnes of their hartSjwith vayn deceitful calors : or bemg re-
generate by y fpkitof God,they endeuour thcm'dues to true holi*
ncfle. Specially when they are to be iudged by their natural! giftes,
from the crowne of their head 10 the fole of their foote , there fhali
not be found one fparcle of goodncs,vnles paraduenture wc will ac«
cufe the fcripture of falihcd,wheiiit fettcth out all the fons of Adam
with thefc titles , that they be of frowa: d and ftubborne heart that
all the imaginatio of their heart is euiUfrom their infancy ^thattheic
thoughts be vaincjthat they haue no^ the feare of God before their
' eyes , that none of them ynderHanderh or fekcth God,brcfely that
they be fleih^y whfch word are vnderftanded all thofe works which
Paulc rehearfcth, fornication, vncleannefle, vnchaftitie,riotoiifnefle,
worfhipping of idolcs,witchecrafces, enmities, contentions, cmula-
cions,3nijers,di{rcn(Tons/e(flcs,enuies,m3nflTU3hters, & whatfoeuer
filthynelfe and abhomination may bedeuifed. This forfothisthc
worthmt'SjWith confidence whereof they muft be proued. But if any
among then cxcell with fuchhonsfty of manners as may hauc fomc
fhewc
The grace of Chrift* tib.3. 314
fhewc of holmes among men :ycc becaufcwe know that God re-
gardeth not the outward gl«ft€rHig,we muft fcarch the very foucainc
of workes if we will hauc ihem to juaile any thing to righteoufnefle.
We muft ( I fay) throughly loke into them , from what aftedion of
heart thefe works piocedc.But although here lieth open a moft large
fieldc to djfcourfe in,ycr becaufe the matter may be declared in very
fcwc v/ordes,l wiJi follow afmuch as I may a brcfencs m teachmg,
X Firlt I deny not thiit whatfoeuer excellent gifts appeareinthc
vnbeleuers , they arc the gifts of God. Neither do I fo difflr from
common iudgenlent, that I would affiime that there is nodiflferencc
betwene the iuftice, temperance and equitie of Titus and Traianus,
ind the rage , mtemperance , and crucltie of Caligula , or Nero , oc
Domitian : betwene the filtiiy luftes of Tiberius , and in this bchalfc
the continence of Vcfpafian : and(that we may not tarry vpon fome
fpeciall vertues or vices) betwene the obferuing and the defpiling of
right and lawes. For there is fo great difference of right and wrongc,
that it appeareth euen in the dead image therof For what thing fli.'ll
there remain Well ordered m the world,if we cofound thefe together?
Therefore fuch a difference betwene honeft and vnhoneft doinges,
the Lorde hath not oncly cngrauen in the mindes of all men , but
alio doth oft confiimeit with the difpenfation of his prouidencc.For
we fee how he extendeth many bit flings of this prefent life to them
that^mong men do follow veitue Not bycaufe that outward image
of vcrtue dcfcrueth fo much as the leaft bcncfire of hisrbui fo it plca-
feth him to declare by pioofe how much true righteoiifftes pleafeth
hinV, when h^ fuflfereth enen outward and fiined righteoulnefle not
to be without rewarde. Whereupon followeth th-at which we euea
novice confefled, that thefe Vertues/uch as they be, or rather imat^es
of vertues , are the giftes 6f God , forafmuch as there is nothing in
any wife-praife worthyjwhich procedeth not from him.
■ ^ But neuertheles it is true which Auguftinc writcthjthat all they tibr. 4.
that arc ftraungers from the true religio of the one God, howfocuer contra
they be accompted worthy of admiration for opinion of vertue,ai c l«^'*"«i
not oncly wotthy oFno rewarde,but rather are worthy of punillimet,
becaufe they do with dealing of their heart , befpot the pure good
things of God. For though they be the inllruments of God , to pre-
fcrue y felowfhip of men with iuftice, c6cinence,teperance of n^indc,
valiantnes, and wifed6m;yet they do very euclly execute thefe good
workes of God'.becailfethey are reftrained from euill doing , not by
(incere loue of goodne$,but either by onely ambition, or by loue of
thcmfelueSjOr by fomc otlicr crpkcd affedioaWhcras chcrfoic they
RR ij
Cap,
.14. Of the maner how to receiuc
are corrupt by the very vncleannes of hart as by ihtir beginning,they
are no more to be reckened among vertues,than thpfe viccs^which
are wonttodGceiuebyrcafonofncrenes andJikenefTeof vercue.Fi-
nally when we remembre, that the ende of that which is right, euer
is that God be rcrued:whatrocucr tendeth to any other ende, forth-
with worthily lofeth the name of right.Bycaufe therefore they hauc
not refped to the markc which the wifedome of God appointeth:
although y thing that tliey do/eeme good in doing,yei: by a wrong-
ful ende it is fin.He t5cludcth therfore that all the Fabricij,Scipioes,
andCatocs, inallthofc excellent ades of theirs: yet finned in this
bchalfe,that whereas they lacked the light of faith,they did not ap-
ply them to the ende to which they ought to haue applied them : &
that for that.caufe, true righteoufnes was not in themcforafmuch a$
duties are not weyed by the doings, but by the endcs. :
i.Toh.5 4 Moreouerjf it be true which lohn faith, that there is no life
' *• without y fonne of God : who fo haue no part in Chnftjwhat maner
of men fo euer they be*> what foeuer they do or go about , yet they
runne forward with their whole courfe into deftrudion & the iudge-*
Libr.ad rr.ent of eternall death. After this rcafon , is that faid of Auguftine:
Bonita. Qyj. j-eligjon djfcerneth the righteous from the vnrighteoos , not by
^ " ' lawe of woykes ;but by the very lawe of faith,wJthout which, thole
'J.^\ "^ ^hat feeme good workes arc turned into fins.Whcrfore the fame Au-
guftine faithvery well in an other place, when hecompareththeen-*
deuor of fuch men to running out of the way. For howc much fsfter
a man runneth out of the way,fo much further he is from tjhc marlcei
and therefore is made fo much more miferable. Wherefore he af-
^rmeth ihat-it is better to halt in the way , than to runne out of ^b^
way.Finally it is certaine that they are cuell trees,forafmuch as wjtl)-
out the comunicatingof Chrift there is no fandification.Thcy roay
therefore beare fairefruites and bcautifuU to the eye ,yea& Iweet^
intaftjbut inrio wifegoodfiuites. Hereby we ealily perceiue that
whatfoeuer man thinketh,purpofeth, or doth, before that be here-,
conciicd to God by faith , is accurfed, and not onely of no value tQ
righteoufnefle,buf of certnine deferuingto damnation. And-why
difpute we hereof as of a doutfull thing , fith it is already proued by
^cb.i I. ^^^ wirnede of the Apoftle , that it is impoflible that any man may
s. pleafe God without fairh? ,
5 Bur there ihall yet appeare a plainer profe,if the grace of God
be in com pari ron,di redly fetagainft the naturall ftate of man. For the
ohn.5 Scripture cneth out cuery where , that God findcih nothing in man
"•J* whereby he may be pxouoked to do good 10 him, but with his owne
free
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3, 315
free goodnefle preucnteth him. For what can a deade man do :o ac-
leme hft? But when he lightncth vs with the knowledgCiof himfclFej
he is faid to raife vs from death,and to make vs a newe creature. For
wefeethatoftentimes/peciallyofthe Apoftle,the^oodncsofGod Epli.2.
is fet forth vnto vs by this title.God (faith he) which is rich in mercy, '^'
for the great loue wherewith he loued vs , cuen when we were dead
by {inncs,hath raadevsaUue together in Chnft.&c. In another
place , where vnder the figure of Abraham he cntreateth of the ge- 1 0^.41.
nerall calling of the faithful,he fa:th:it is God that gcueth hfe to the
<lead J and calleth thofc thinges that are not,as though they were. If
we be nothing.what (I befeech you) can we do?Whereforey Lordc
ftrongly beateth downe this arrogancy,in the hiftory of lobjin thefe Rom.u
wordes : who preucnteth mc,and 1 lliall rendre it him? for all things J 5
are mine.WhichfentencePaule expounding applieth it to this,that _° •'**•
we lliould not thinkc that we bring any thing to the Lorde but mere Rom.io
ihame of needines and emptines. Wherefore in y place aboue cited, 35.
to proue that weare come into the hope of faluation by his grace
alone, not by works,he allegeth that we arc his creatures becaufe wc
are new begotten m Cbriil Icfus, to the good workes which he hath Ephe.j.
prepared that we Ihouldwalkc in the: As if hehadraid:whichof vs »«•
may boatte that he hath with his righteoufne0e prouoked God, fith
our firft power to do good procedeth out of regcncraiion?For as wc
are made by nature, oyle {hall foner be wronge out of a ftone, than a
good worke out of vs.Truly it is wonderfull if man being codemned
of fo great a l"hame,dare yet fay that there remaincth any thing with
him. Thereforclet vsconfefle with this noble inftrument ofGod, i.Tim.i
ihat wc are called of God with a holy calling , not according to our 9»
workeSjbut according to his purpofe and grace:and that the kindncs
& loue of God our fauiou: toward vs hath appeared jbecaufe he hath Tit, 3.4.
faued vs,not by the works of righteoufnefle which we haue don,buc "
according to his owne mercy:y being iuftjfied by his grace,we might
be made the hcircs of eternall life. By this cofefiTion we difpoill man
of all righteoufnefle euen to the leaft litle pecce thercof,iill he be by
only mercy regenerate into hope of eternall hfe:forafmuch as if the
righteoufnefle of workes do bring any thing toward the iuftifyins of
VSjit is falfly faid that wc are iufl:ified by grace.Truly the Apoftle had
not forgotten himfclfe,when he affirmed iuftificatio to be of free gifr,
which in an other place refoneth y grace is nowe not grace,if works ^0^1.11
do any thing auaill. And what other thing doth the Lord mean, whe 6.
he faith that he came not to call righteous men but finners? If oncly Mart ^
finners arc receiuedjwhy feekc wc an entry by fained righteoufncs? ' ^
Cap.14. ' Ofthcmancrhowtorccei'uc
6 Still this fame thought hachnow,& then recourfe to my minde,
that it is pcrill lealt lihauld do wrong to the mercies of God, which
do fo carefully trauaill in prouinge of this thing as though it were
doutfuU or darke.Bat bycaufe our cnuioufnes is (uch , as vnleflc it be
moft ilraightly thruft out of place,it ncuer yeldeth to God y which is
his,I am copelled to tary fomwhat the longer vpon it. Yet forafmuch
as the fcripture is clere enough in this matter,! wil in fighting rather
!?fa. jtf vfe y wordes thereof then mine owne.EfayCjwhcn he harh defcribed
^' the vniucrfall deftrudion of makind,doth tmmediatly after very fitly
adioin the ordrc of reftoring.The Lordc harh reen,and it femed euell
in his eyes. And ha fawejthat there is no man:aAd he maruailed that
there is none that oftereth himfelfe : an J he hath fet faluation in his
owne arme, & hath ftrengthened himfelfe with his ownc righteouf-
nefle. Where are our righteoufncfles if it be true which the Prophet
riith:that there isno man ihathclpeihthe Lorde inrecoueringhis
>n.'5.x. faliiaiionJSoanother prophetjwherehebriniiethin the Lorde, djp»
^> courfing of the reconciling of finners to himfelfe,fatth : 1 will efpoufe
thee to me for euer, in righteou(nes,iudgemcnt, grace and mcrcie.l
wil fay to her y hath not obteined mercy,thou had obtained mercy.
If fucn conuenant , which it »s certaine to be the firft conioining that
wehauewithGod, ftandeth vpon the mercieof God,there isleft
no foundation of our owne righreoufnefle. And I would fain learne
of thofe men which fainey man meteth Gad with (ome righteouf-
neffc of Works, whether they thinke that there is any righteoufncflc
atalijbutrhai: which is acceptable to God, Ifit bemadne.sroihinke \i
fo y what acceptable thin-^ to God can precede from his enemies,
whom he "/holly abhorreth with all their doings? That all we, I fay,
are the dedly and profefTed enemies of our God, the truth it klfe pe-
Rom.^. ihHeth,till being iuftified, we arc receiuedintofrendfhip. Ifiuftjfica-
^' , rionbe thebeeinnini^oMoue,what riehteoufnefle of workesfhall
j\ * 1^0 before it?So [ohn,To tui nc away that peftilcnt arrogancc,doth di-
I ,lohn. ligentiv put vs in minde how we did not firft loue him. And the felfc
♦ \^- fame thing the Lorde had long before taught by his Prophet : I will
Pj^''^* loue ih^.faich he,with a free loue,becaufe mme anger is turned. Cerr
tainly his loac is not prouoked by workes if it hath of his owne ac-
cordc inclined It felfe vntovs. But the rude common forte of men
thinke it to be nothing els.bur that no man hath deferued that Chrift
fhould pcrforme our redcptionryet that to the entriog into the pof-
feflion of redemption , we be holpcn by our ownc workes. Yea but
howfofucr we be red' med o( Chrift, yet till we be by the calling of M
the Father graffed into the communio of him , we arc both heires of
daike-
»J
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3J 31^
darkcneflc and death, and the enemies of God. For Paulc teacheth i.Cor.
that we are not cleanfed and wafllicd from our vncleannefles by the ^•***
blood of Chrift , vnnli the holy Ghoft worketh that cleanfing m vs.
Which fame thing Peter minding to teach , declareth that the fane- i.Pet.f.
tifyii^ of the Spirit auaileth vnto obedience & the fprinkhng of the ^*
bloode of Chrift. If we be by the Spirit fprinkled with the bloode of
Chrift vnto clean(ing,let vs not thinke that before fuch watering wc
be any other than a (inner is without Chrift. Let this therefore re-
niainc ccrt3ine,y the beginning of our faluatio is as it were a certainc
refurredlion fi 6 de.nth to Iiferbecaufe when for Chrifts fake it is ^eucn
to vs to beleue in him,the we hrft begin to pafle from deatli into life.
7 Vnder this fort are comprehended they which hauc in the
diuilion abouc fet bene noted for the feeond and third fort of men.
Forihevncleannefteofconfcience proueth that both of them arc
not yet regeneraie by the Spirit of God. And againe, whereas there
is no regeneration in thcmjthis proueth the want of faith.Whereby
appeareth that ti.ey arc not yet reconciled to God , nor yet iuftified
in his fight : forafmuch as thefe good things are not attained to , but
by faiih.What can finners being eftraged from God bring forthjbut
that which is accurfed in his iudgcment?With this fooliih boJdnes in
dcede,both all wicked men arc puffed vp, & fpecially hypocrites,be-
caufe howefoeuer they knowe that their whole heart fwarmeth full
of filthinefle,yet if they do any works y hauc a fhew of goodncs, they
thinke them worthy that God fhould not defpile tlic.Herof groweth
that pernicious errour,y being proued giliy of a wicked and mifchc-
uous minde,yet ihey can not be driucn to cofcfTe themfelues void of
righteoufnesibut euen when they acknowledge thefelues vnrightc-
ous , becaufe they can not dmy it , yet they arrogantly claime fomc
righteoufnes vnto ihe.This vanitic the Lord excelletly well confuteth
by the prophet: A fke(faith he)chc priefts/ayingrif a mancarrie fane- ^*S- *•
tificd ftefti in the hemme of his garmet,& putteth to it bread or other * *•
meate,lliall it be fandified? The priefts aunfwercd : No And Hageec
faid. If a defiled man in foule touch any of fuch thefe things, (hall it
be defiled^ The priefts anfwered:it fhalbe dtfiled. Haggce faid. So is
this people before my facc,faith the Lord: & fo all the works of their
hands ,& all things y th cy offer to me ilialbe dcfilcd.I wold to god that
this faying might either get full credit with vs.or well be fettled in our
remebrace.For there is no n»an,though he be otherwife in his whole
life neuer fo hainous a wicked doer,y can abide to be perfw3ded,th3t
which y Lord here plainely pronouceth.The naughticft man,ro Tone
as he hath performed one or two doubtfull dcedes of y law,doubtcth
RR iiij
Cap.14. Ofthemanerhowtoreceiuc
not that ic (halbc accepted to him for rightcoufnes.Bat y Lord cricth
to the contra vie,that there is no fandification gotten there by, vnleffe
the heart be firft well cleanfed. And not contented therewith, he af-
firmeth that rill the workes whatfoeuer they be that procede from
finners , are dcHled with vncleannes of the heart. Therefore let the
name of nghceoufneffe depart from thefe workes which are by the
Lordesowne mouth condemned of filthines. And withhowefita
ii'nilttude doth he ihew the fame / For it might hauc bene obiededi
that whatloeuer the Lorde had commaundcd , was inuiolably holy.
But he on the coirarie iide fetteth againft them, that it is no maiueU,
if thofe things that are hallowed by the lawe of the Lorde , are de-
filed with the filthineHc of naughty men:whereas an vncleane hand
prophaneth a holy thing with touching it.
ifa. I. 8 The fame matter he excellently well handlcth in Eraye,OfFer
^' not (faith he) facrifice in vaine : mcenfe is abhomination to mc : my
foiile hatcthyour Calcndes & folemnities.They are become tedious
to mc, & I haue ben^e werie with bearing them:when you fliall hold
vp your handes I will tourne away mine eyes from you : when you
(h.ili multiply prayer I will not heare.'for your hades are full of bloud.
Be waOied.bc cleane,t.?ke away y eueil of your thoughts. What mea-
neth this that the Lord fo lotheth the obeyinge of his owne lawe?Yca
but he hcrcrefufeth jiothing that is of the naturail obferuing of the
lawe,y beginning whereof he eucry v/here tcacheth to be the viifai-
nvd fc-areof his name. When thatis taken away, what fo cucr ihings
arc offjred him are not onely trifles , but ftinking and abhominable
fikhineife.Nowe let the hypocrites go,& keping peruerfnes wrapped
vp iritheu-heartjcndeuourto defcruethcfauourofGod with works.
'ro.15. ^"^ ^y ^'^'^ meane,they Ihall more & moreprouoke hi to wrath. For
• to him the facrilices of wicked are abhominable, and the only prayer
of vp! ighi" men plcafcth him. Therefore we hold y out of dQut,which
ought to bcmoii comonly knowen to him , that is cuen but meanel/
cxercij'cd in the Scriptures ,thateuen thofe workes thatglifter mofl:
glonoudy la men not yet truly fan6tificd,are fo farre ffom righceoui^
ugufi ncflc in the fight of the Lord,!-hat they be iudgcd fins. An<l therforc
br. c\c ji^^y [^^^^(, Q^^{ fnof! truely that hauc taught that fauoiir v/ith God is
!*'y^ '^ not procorcd to any perfon by woi kes : but contraiywife that workes^
^ " do then pk.)/t»& neuer till thcn,vvhcn y perfon hath fiift found grace
in the fight of God. And this ordreisreligioufly tobekept,to which
the fcripture leadeth vs by y hand-Mofes wry teth that the Lord had
enc 4. rcfpcd to Abcli Sc to his workes. Sec you not how he declareth that
God IS fauof able to the menne > before that he hath refpc^ to their
woikcs?
The grace oiChrilt. Lib.3. 317
workes?Wherforc the cleaniing of the heart muit go berore,thac ihc Ad x j,
workes which come from vs , may bt louingly recei'.ied ol God ; be^ ^
caufe this faying ot lercmy is alway in foice,that the woijjcs of God ^^' ^' '
haue refped vnto tructh. And that ic is only faith by which the hearts
of men are clenfed , the holy Ghoil hath iiffiimed by the mouth of
Peter : whereby it is certaine , that the hilc fundaiion is in true and
liuely faith.
9 Now let vs lookc what righteoufnes they haiic,whom we hauc
fet in the fourth degree . We graimc that when God by the meane
pf the righteoufnes of Chrift,reconcileth vs to himfelfe,& giuing vs
free forgiuenefle of finnes accompceth vs for right-eous , with fuch
ipercy is aUo conioyned this his beneficial doinge , that by his holy
Tpirithe dwelleih in v.s,by the power whereof the lu{tes of our flellic
arc daily more & more mortiHedjbut we are fanCtiHed:that is to fay,
hallowed to the Lord vnto true purenes of hfe,when our lieartes arc
framed to the obedience of the law; that this may be our chiefe wi!,
10 feiue his wiil,and by all meanes to aduaunce only his glory. But e-
uen wide by the guidinge of the holy Gnoft we walke in the wayes
ot the Lord, lealt yet we forgertinge our lelue> (hould waxe proude,
there are Lft cercame remnants ofimperfedion, which may miniiicr
vs matterofhumihty. There is noncrighieous,((aith the Scripture) i j^j;„
that doth good and Imneth not What maner of righteoufnes ther- 0.6, °
fore will they yet get by their workes.<'Fiiil I fay , that the bcrt worke
tliatcan be brought foorth oFthem , is yet alway fpnnkeled and cor-
rupted v/iih fome vnckannefle of the fieih, and hath as it were fome
dregges min^elcd with it. 1 fayjlctaholy feruantof Godchoofeout
of all his life the molt exctliet thing that he Ihall thmke that he hath
done in the whole courfe therof,^ let him wel cor.lider all the partes
ofit.withoutdouthe fliall finde fomewheie fomewhat fiiuoringe of
the roLtenneflfe of tiie fldlijforalTnuch as to doing well our cherefull
<]uickenefl'e is neuer fuch as it ought to bc,but in (lacking our courfe
our weakcncfle ismuch. Although we fee that there are euident
foule blots whcrwith the workes of the holy are befprcd, yet graunt
that they be nothing but mofl htle fpottes:lliall they nothing offend
the eics of God,before whom euen the ftarres are not deane? Thu?
hauc we fliewed that there commeth not fo much as one good workc
out of holy men, which if it beiudgcdin itfelfe,dcreructh not iuft rc^
wardoffhame.
10 Secondly I {ay,that if it were poffible that we fhould hauc fom
throughly pure and perfect woikes,yet one finneis enough to blotte
put and^uenchali (he remembrance of che former nghtcouihcirc.
Cap.i 4. Of the maner how to rcceiuc
as the Prophet fay th. With whom alfo lames agrccth:He that offen-
dethp'aith he) in one, is made gilty of all. Nowc fith this moriall hfc
-is neuer pure or void from linne,whatroeu€r rightcoufnes we fhould
purchace , being from time to time with (innes following corrupted,
opprcfled and loft, it fhoulde not come into the light of God, nor be
accompted to vs for righteoufnetfe. Finally when the righteoufncfTc
of woikes is entreated of, we muft not haue refped to the worke of
die lawejbut to the commaundement. Therefore if we fecke righte-
oufnetfe by thelawjwc (hallm vame bring forth one or twoworkes:
but a perpetuall obedicce of y law is there ncccffary.Wherfore the
lord doth not but once(as many foohflily thinke)impute to vs righ-
ceoufneife that fame forgiuenefle of Imnes wherof we hauc fpokcn,
that hauinge once obtained pardon of our life paft, we (hould after-
ward feekc rightecuines in the lawrbecaufe he (hould Co do nothing
el(e but bring vs into a falfe hope,and mocke and laugh vs to fcornc.
For fith no pcrfedion coulde come to vs folonge as we arc clothed
with this flelli, & fith the law threaineth death 6i ludiicmet to all thi
f performe not ful rightcoufnes in worke-it dial alway hauc wherof
it may accufe and condemne vs , vnlcfle the mercy of God on the o»
ihcr fide did wiihftand it,to acquite vs from time to time with conti«
nuall forgiuencfie of finnes. Wherefore this ftandcth alway certainc
which we fayd at the beginninge , that if we be weied by our owne
worthinefle, whatfoeuer we purpofe or go about, yet we with alloujr
trauailes andendeuours are worthy of death and deftrudion.
1 1 Vpon thefe two pointcs wc muft ftrongly ftand faft.-that there
was neuer any worke of a godly ma, which ifit were examined by the
feucrc iudgement of God, was not damnable. Againe, if there be any
fuch ftiewed,(which is not poftible for man)yet being corrupted and
defiled with the finnes,wherewith it is certainc that the doer of it is
loden, itloofeth the grace. And this is the chiefe point of our difpu*
tation.For about the beginninge ofiuftification there is noftrife be*
twene vs and the (bunder forte of Scholomcn, but that a finnner be*
ing freely deliuered from damnation obtaineth righteoufnefle, and
that by the forgiuene(re of finnej:fauing that they vnder the word of
luftification comprehend the renuing wherewith we are newly for-
med by the Spirit of God vnto the obedience of the law & they thus
defcribe the rightcoufnes of a man regenerate , that man being once
reconciled to God by the faith of Chnlt, is by good workes ludged
righteous before God , and by their deferuinge is accepted. But the
. Lordc contra I i wife pronouncerhthathe imputed to Abraham faith
for rightcoufncife , not at the time when he yet ferued Idols > but
whca
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 318
'when he had already many yeares excelled in hoiincflc of life.Ther-
fore Abraham had long worlhipped God from a pure hcart,and had Hab. u
performed the obedience of the lawe which may be performed of a 4.
mortall m3n,yec he hath righteoufheffe repo(ed m fnyth. Whereu-
pon we gacher,acCQrding to the argument of P.iule,that it was not of ^©•■♦•T''
workcs. Likewifc wKen it is fayd in the Prophet. The righteous man Pfa, j j,
(hall liue by faitlvtis not fpokenof wicked & prophane mcn,whom
the Lord iuftifieth by conuerting rhem to the faith, but the fpeach is
dircded to the faithfull, and to them is promjff d life by faith. Paulc
alibtaketh away all dout, when for confirminge of that fentencCjhc
taketh this verfc of Dauid. Bleflexi are they whofc inquities are for*
giucn. But it is certaine,tha: Dauid fpeakcthnjtof the wicked , but
of the faithfullt fuch as himftlfe wasrbecaufe he fpake out of the fee-
Im^of his owne confcieace.Thcrefore this bleflednefle we muft not
haue once in our life,but hold ii throghout all our hfe.Laft of all he
(tftifieth thar the embaffigc concerning the free reconciliation with
God is not publifhed forone ortwodayes, but is perpetuallinthc
church. Therefore the faithfull haue eucn to the end of their life no
o:hcr riv^hteoufncfTe than that which is there fet forth. For Chrift e-
lierlaftm :,ly rcmaineth the Mediator to reconcile the father to vs,& 18.
the effettualncfi"; ot his death is cuerlarting : namely wafhing, fatisfa-
^ion,expiatio!i,Hnally perfed obedience, wherwith all our iniquities
are couercd.Nciih rdoth Paul to the Ephefians fay,that we haue the
begiruiing of faUuuion out of grace, but that we are faued by grace*
not orworkes,that no man ihould glory.
Ii Th'jftartinge holes which the Scholemendohercfceke toc-
(cjpc by, do not dcliuer them. They fay that good workcs are not by
inward vvorchines in ihemfeliiei of fo great value , that they be fufii-
^iciit to purchase righceouf^ius.-but this,that they be of fo great value,
is of grace accepting them.Then, bccaufe they be driucn to confefle
that the rigiiceoufneffe of workcs is in this life alway vnperfed, thcjr
grauncth.it wc, folongeas wehue, do needeforgiueneflcof finncs,
whereby the want ofworkes may be fupplied: bur,that the defaultes
which arc committed, are rccompenced with woikes of fupcrcroga-
tion.For I anfwerejthat ihc acceptinge grace as they call it,is none o-
ther than his free goodne/Te wherewith the father embraccth vs in
Chriftjwhen he clotheth vs with the innoccncy pf Chrift,& accomp-
terh the Cnme ours,that by the beneficial meane therof he may take
vs for holy,pure,and innocenc.For,the righteoufnes of Chrift(which
as it only is perfedjfo only can abide the fight of God) muft be fet in
our fteade,and be prefenccd at the barre as a farecy. Herewith we be«>
Cap. 1 4. Of the maner how to receiuc
fng furnifhed , do obtaine continuall forgiuenefle of linnes in faith.
With the purcnelfe hereof our filthineflfes and vncleannefTes of im-
perfcdions being couered are not imputedibuc are hidden^as if they
were buried,y they may not come into the iudgement of God, vntil
the houre come,when the old ma being flaine & vtterly deftroied in
vs,thegoodne(reof Godlhallreceiue vsmtoblelTcd peace with the
new Ada, where let vs looke for the day of the Lord,in which in re*
ceiuing vncorrupt bodies , we fiiall be remoued into the glory of the
heauthly kingdom. • ■ ■- ' ♦
1 5 If thcfe thinges be true,verily no workes of ours can of thcm-
felues make vs acceptable & pleafing to God:neither can the workes
thcmfelues pleafe , but in refped that man bemge couered with the
righteoufneflc of Chrift^plcafeth God, & obtaineth forgiuenelfe of
bis finnes . For God hath not promifed the reward of eternall Irfe to
feme ccrtaine workes , but onely pronounceth that he which doth
thcfe things, fhal liue:fettinge the notable curfc againlt all them that
continue not in all thinges. Whereby the deuife of righteoufnelfe in
parte is largely confutedjfith no other righteoufnes is admitted into
ne3ue,but a whole obferuing of the law. And no whit founder is that
which they are wont to babble of fupplying of recompence by works
of Supererogation . For why <■ Do they not ftill rcturne to the fame
«u.i?. place from whence they arc already fliut out : that he which kepech
• the law in partc,is by workes fo farre righteous?That which no man
of found iudgemet will graunt themjthcy do too rhamclelly take foP
cofefled. So oft the Lord teftifieth that he acknowledgeth no rightc*
oufnefle of workeSjbut in the perfed obferuing of his law. What ob-
ftinacy is it,that we when we are defticute of that obferuing, ieaft wc
(houlde feeme fpotled of all glory , that is , to haue altogether giuen
place to God , do boaft ourfelues of I wot not what fmall peeces of a
few workes>and go about by fatisfadions to redeme that which wan-
tcth.Saiisfadions haue already before bin fufficiently ouerthrowen,
that we ought not now fo much as to dreame of the. Only this I fay,
that they which fo play the fooles,do not wey bow deteftablc a thin^
finne is before God:for trudy they fliould vnderft.ind that the whole
righteoufncffe of men beinge layd vpon a beapc , is not fufficient to
rene.3. make recompence for one finne.For we fee that man was by one of-f
?• fence fo caft away and abandoned of God,that he thcrewithall loft alt
meanc to rccouer faluation.Therforethe power of Satisfaction is ta-
ken away , wherewith they flatter thcmfelues , bur furely fhall ncuei^
fatisfie God,to whom nothing is pleafantor acceptable that procce--
deth fro his enemies. And his enemies arc all they to whom he pur->
pofcth
The grace of Ch rift. Lib.3. 31^
pofeth to impute linnes. Therefore our (innes muft be coucred and
forgiuen , before that the Lorde haue rcfped to any worke of ours.
Whereupon followeth that the forgiuenes of (innes is of free grace pj^^j ,
which they do wickedly blafphemc that ti uft in any fatisfadions.Let 13.
vs therforejafcer the example of the Apoftle, forgetting thofc things
that are behinde vs,and hafting forward to thofe thinges that arc be-
fore vs , runne in our race , cndeuoringe to the price of the hie caU
Imge.
14 But how doth the boafting of the workes of fupercrogation a •
gree with that rule which is taught vs , that when we haue done all
thinges that arc commaunded vs,we lliould (ay that we arc vnprr)tita- tu^^ ,-
ble fcruantes,and that we haue done no more than we ouj^htf'To fay iq.
before God, is not to faine or to lie, but to determine wiih thy feife^
that which thou art aflTured of.The Lord therefore commaundeth v$
vnfainedly to thinkc and confider with our ft- lues,that wc 60 not anjr
free beneHcial doings to him,but to render due feruice. And worthi-
ly. For we are feruauntes endetted in fo many feruices,as wc are noc
able to difcharge, although all our thoughts & all our members, were
turned into dutefuil deedes of the law. And therefore that which he
fayth. When ye haue done all thinges that are commaunded you,&c.
is afmuch in eft'ed,as if the righteoufnes of one man were more tha
^11 the righteoufnes of men. How therfore may wefof whom there
is none that is not moft farre diftant from this marke) be fo bolde a$
to boad that we haue added a heapc to the full mcafure ? Neither i*
there any caufe why any man may take exceptio and fay,that nothing
withftandeth but that his endeuour may proceede beyonde nece(ra-
ry dutiesjwhich in fome behalfc cealTeth thofe that befrpm nece(ra-
ry.For this we muft altogether hblde, that wc can imagine nothin^ic
jhat auaiteth cither to the worfhip or the loue of God , which is not
coprehendcd vnder the law of God.If it be a part of the law,let vs aoc
boaft of voluntary hberality,where we are bound to neceflfity,
. I J And for this purpofe that glorying of Paule is out of fcafon aU
Icaged. That amog the Corinthians he did of his ownc wil yeld of his i-Cor,
rightjwhich orherwife he might haue vfed if he had would, and that ^•«-
he hach cmploied vpon them not pnely fo much as he ought of due^
ty.but alfo hath giuen them his free trauaill beyonde the boundes of
dueties.Bu£ they (hould haue marked the reafon there expreifedithat
he did this leaft he (houJd be an ofFcnfeto the weake.For falfe and dc-
ccitful workemen did boaft rhen elues with this alluring (hew of li- '
bcrality,wherby they might both procure fauour ro their poifonous
dodrincs,3nd m(c vp haired to the Gofpcll,fo that Pauic was driucn
Cap.r4. Of the manerhowto receiiie
of neceflity either to bring the dodrine of Chiift into danger, or tO
mecte with fuch craftes. Go to;if it be to a chriftiannian an indiffe-
rent thinge* to runne into offenfe, when he may i efraine it , then I
graunt that the Apoftle4idfomthingof Si>pererogati6 for the lord,
Butif this were bynghi required of a wife diftributer ofihe Golpel,
then I fay y he did that which was his duety to do. Finally although
there appeare no luch caufcjyet this faying of Chryfoitome is alway
true, that all our thinges are in the fame cafe whet cm arc the propel
poflcffions ofbondmen,which it is certairte by the law robe due to
[.uk.17 their Lord. And Chrift hath vttered the fame in the parable. For he
asked what thankc we will giue to-a bondefcruant wher^haumg birr
all the day trauailed with fundry labours he returneth borne to vs in*
the euening.Butitis po{llble,tlKit he hath labored with greater dili-
gence than we durft haue reqtfired.Be it fo.yet he hach done no thrng
but that which by hi^ eftate of bondage he ought , for he with hi$
whole ability is ours. I fpeake not of what fort their Supercrogati5s
are V7hich thefc men wilboatt of to God:for they bctri[ic$,fuch as he
neither hach at any time coftirnaunded,nor doth approuc them ,nor
will allow chcm whe accompt (halbe to be made before him. In this
fignificationoncly we will graunt that ihey ae workes ofSupcrero-
Pfal.i. gation.namely of which it is fpoken in the Prophet: whaha^ requi-
red thcfe things at your hands?But let them remember what is in ai*
"***• 55* other place alfo fpoken of ihefe things : Wherefore do ye weye youf
(Uaer & nor in breadrYc fpend in labour & not inbemg fafisfied.lt is
in deede not very hard for thefe klle Rabbinesto dilputevndcrthc
{hadow in a foft chairc:bl»rwb^n the fotiera^gne iudge fliall fit in hi*
judgement fcate , fuch windy decrees lliaUof neccility vanifhe awayJ
ThiSjthiJ was to be fought what affiance of defenfe we may bring to
his iudgemet featc, not what we may talke of in fchooles Sf corners^
16 In this behalfe thei e are chiefely two peftilences to be driuen
outof ourmindes : that we put no affiance in the righteoufnefle of
workes . And chat we afcribe no part of glory to rhem , The Scrip-
tures daeuery where thruft vs from all mancr of affiance, whe thej''
teach tl^at our righteoufneffes d<y ftinkein the fight of God , vnlcfic
they teceiue a good fauor from the innocence of Chrift,& that they
can do nothing but prouoke the vengeance of God, vnlcffe they be
fuftainedby thetend<rnes ofhis mercy. Moreoucr they foleaue no-
thing to v$,bw: that we fhoulde craue y mercy of our iudge with that
*ra.i4 J confefTion of Dauid, il?at none flial be iuftihcd before him^ if he rc-
*ob. lO. ^juifc accompt of his feruantes. But where lob fayth ; If I haue done
I J. wickedly ,wo to mc.but if I do rrghtcoufly,yct I wil not fo lift vp my
head:
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 320
hcadithough he meane of that nioft hie righteoufnes of" God,whcr-
vnto the very Angels anfwcrc not : yet he therewithal! (hcweth that
when they connc to the iudgcment of God,there remaineth nothing
for all mortal men,but to hold their peace as dumme.For it tcndeth
not only to this purpofe that he had rather witlihgly ycelde than da-
gcrojfly ftriuc with the rigoroufnes of God:but he meaneth that he
felt no other righteoufnes in himfelfejthan fuch as at y fitft moment
Ibould fall before the fiij,ht of God. When affiance is driucn away^
glorying muft alfo neceffanly depart . For who can giue the praifc of
righteoufnes to thtfe workes,the affiance whereof trcmbleth before
the (ight of God? We mu(i therefore come whether Efiy calleth vs, Bfi,^^,
that all the fecde of Ifracll may be praifcd & glory in God'bccaufb it *o.
is moft true which he faith in an other place , that we arc the plan- ^'*- **•
ting of the glory of God . Our minde therefore fliall then be rightly
purged.when it (hal neither in any behalfe reft vpon the confidence
of workcs,nor reioyfe in the glory of them. But this errour cncoura-'
ged fooliili men to the puffinge vp of this falfe & lying affiance , that
rhey alway fet the caufc of their faluation in workes.
- 17 But if we lookc to the foure kindes of caufes ^ which the Pht-
lofophers teach vs to confider in the effed of thinges,we (hall findc
that none of them doth accord with workes in the ftabliffiing of our
feiuation. For the Scripture doth cuery where rcporte that the caule
of procuringc the cternall hfe to vs , is the mercy of the hcauenly fa-
ther and hii free loue towarde vs ; that the Materiall caufc is Chnft
wi!h his obedience , by which he purchaccd righteoufncfl"*^ for vs.
What alfo fhall we fay to be the formall or inftrumentall caufe but
faich ? And thcfe three caufes lohn comprehendeth together in one ^<*^- >
icntcnccjwhen he faith,God fo loucd y worId,that he gaue his only *^'
begotten fonne , that eucry one which bcleueth in him may not pc-
rifhe , but may haue eucrlaftinge lifc.Now the final] caufe the Apo-
ftle teftiiieth to be both the (hewmge of the righteoufnclfe of Godj
and the praife of his goodnefle ; where he rehearfeih alfo the other
three in expreffe wordcs.For he faith thus to the Romaincs:aIl haue Rom, j,
finned and doncede the glory of God : butthey areiuftified fre- »!•
ly by his grace. Here thou haft the head & firft fountain, namely that
Ood embraced vs with his free mercy . Then foUoweih : By the re-
demption which is in Chrift lelu.Hcrc thou haft as it were the matter
whereof righteoufnefte is made for vs through feyth in his bloude.
Here is fhevved the inftrument> il caufe , whereby the righteoufneffc
of Chrift IS applied to vs . Laft of all he ioyneth the endc, when he
(aythjvnio the ihe wing of his rightcOiufno that he may be righteous
Cap.14. Ofthemanerhowtoreceiue
& the rjghteoufmaker of him that is oF the faith of Chnft. And (t&
toMch by the way that this righteoufnes ftandeth of reconcihaiion)
he fetteth exprelfely by namejthat Chrill was giuen to vs for rccon-
cihatio.So in the firft chap.alfo to the Ephefians he teacheih that wc
are recciued of God into fauour by mere mercy : that the fame is
wroughtjby the intcrceirion of ChriR : reccined^by £iyth : all to this-
cnde,thatthe glory of the goodnefle of God may KiUy fhine.When
we feey all the partes of our faluntion are fo without vs , what cauiic
is there y we ihould now either hauc affiace or glory in works ? Nei-
ther can ciien the moft fworne enemies of the grace of God mqiic
any controuerfie with vs about the efficient orfinallcaure, vnleflc
they will deny the whole Scripture. In the Maicriall & Formal! caufc
they cafl a fallc colour,3S though our workcs haue a hnlie place with
faith and the righteoufncfleof Chrift. But this alio they teache, the
Scripture crying out againft them,which limply affirmeth both that
Chrift is to vs for righteoufnefl'e and hfe,& that this benefit of righ-
teoufnes is poflcffcd by only faith. r-' ; v " ■- ^
18 But whereas the holy men do ofccnrrmi^S' ftrengthen & com-
fort themfflues with remembrance of their owne inrtoccncy and vp-
rightnes, & fomtime alfo forbeare not to report of it with praife^that:
is done two waies:either that in coparing their good caufe with the
euill caufe of the wicked , they conceiue thereby aflured truft of vi-
d:ory,not fo much for commending of their owne righteoulncflc, as
fortheiuft &deferued condemning of their aduerfanesior that euen
without comparifon ofother^ while they recorde thcmfclues before
God, the purenes of their owne confciece bringcth to the both fomc
comfort & affiance.Of theMofthefe two wayeSjWe flial fee liere-'
aftetiMVowe let vs briefel/ declare of the latter/hovve it agreeth with
that which we haue aboue fay d , that in the mdgement of God wc
muft reft vpon no affiance of workes , and glcM-y vpon ijo opinion of
them.This is the agreement that the holy ones, whenit concernctK
the founding and ftabli{hing of their faluation, do without rcfpcdof
workes brnd their eies to the only goodneffeofGodv And they dtf
nor only bend thcmfclues to it afore all thirtgs'ais to the beginning oS
blcfi"edneirc,but do reft therein as in the ful^Uing of it A confciencc
fo founded.raifed and ftabliihcd,is alfo ftabhflied wirb confideratioii
of woikes:nnmely fo farre as they are the witneftinges of God dwel-
ling and reigning in vs. Sith therfore this affiance of workes hath no
place , vnlclTe thou hauc firft caft the whole affiance of thy minder
vpori the mercy of God: it ought not to fccme contrary to that whetJ
upon it hanucth. Whcrforc when we exclude the affiance of workeyy
wc
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j, 321
fre meanc oncly this that a Chnftian minde may not bowc to the
merit of workesas to the fuccour of faUiati^,but llioulde through-
ly reft in the free promifeofrighceoufnefle. Butwc foibiditnotto
vnderprop and ftrcngihen chisfajch with the figncs of the good will
of God toward it felfe.Forif al the good gifces which God hath be-
ftowed vpon vs , when they be'recorded in remembrance , are to vs
after a certaine maner as it were bcames of the face of God.by which
tve are cnhgluened to beholde that fouerai^ne light of goodncfic:
much more IS the grnceof goodworkcs, which fheweth that the
Spirit ofadoption is giucn vs. ,
19 When therfore the holy ones do by innoccncy of confcicnce
confirme their faith,& gaiher matter of reioyfing,they do norhingc
but call to minde by the frutcs of their calling, that they arc adopted
of the Lord into the place of ( hildren. This therefore that is taught Pro.Xi^
by Salomon,ihat in the feare of the Lord is ftedfaft alTurcdnes: and »••
tins that fometime the holy ones vfe this proteftation, to the entenc
that they may be heard of the lord,that they haue walked before his Gcn.sj
face in vpriglitnes & fimplicity: haue no place in laying the fundaiio 4"'
of ftabliihingof c5rcience:butare theonly of value>rf they be taken *-*^"^£
of the enfuing eflcd:bccaufe both that fearc is no where which may *°*''
ftablifli a full aflurcdnes, & y holy ones are priuie in their cofuiencc
oi fuch an vprightnes,wherwith are yet mingled many remnantes of
the fleiB.But foiafmuch as of die frutes ofregeneracion they gather
an argument of the holy Gholl dwcUmge in them,they do there by
not fclcuderly ftrengthen thcm^elucs to lookc for y help of God in
all their necellities, when they b) expcriece finde him their father in
fo great a matter . And euen this alfo they can not do , vnlefTe they
haue firft co'nceiued the goodaes of God/ealed with no other affu-
redncfl'e,thah of the promife. For if they beginne to wcic it by good
yorkes,nothing flialbe more vncertaine nor more weake:forafmuch
as if workcs be conlidered by themfclucs » they fliall no leffe by their
imperfedion (hew profe of the wrath or God,tha they do with how-
focuei vnperfed pureneffc tcftify his good will. Finally they do fo fct
out.the benefites of God, that yet they turne not away from the free
fauour of Godjin which Paulteftificth that there is y length,breadth, Ephck
depth & heigth of them:as if he fhould fay , Wheihcrfoeuer the fen- 1 1« -
fes oFthe godly do turne themfelues,how hie focuer they clime,how
farre & wide foeuer they extende them,yei they ought not to go out
of the loue of Chrift,but holde therofelues wholly in the meditation
thereof, becaufe itcomprehendeihallkindes ofmcafurcsinit.And
therefore he faytii that it excellech & furmounteth aboue all know-
Cap. 1 4. Of the rhancr how to rcceiuc
ledge : and ctiat when we airknbwledge how much Chrift h'ath ioued
m 8. vs, we are fulfills, d jnto'44li:hefulnefrcof God. As in an other place,
* when heglorieththatalltheGodlyarevanquifhers mbatten,heby
andby dddeth a reafonjbccaufe of him that ioued vs.
io We fee now that rhere is not in the holy ones that affiance*
of works, which either giuerh any thing to the merite of thcm(for-
afmnch as they regard the none otherwife than as the gifts of God,
wh^erby they rcknowledge his goodaes none otherwife tha as figncs
of theirralhnge , whereby may thinke vpon their eleftion)or which
withdraweth not any thinge from the free righteoufnelfe which wc
obtainc in Ghrift , forafmuch as it hangeth vpon it, and ftandcth not
wi[houtit. The fame thinge doth Auguftine in few wordes,buc very
welfet out where he writech.I do not fay to the Lord,defpife not the
workes of my handes , or I haue fought the Lord with my handes &
' haue not bin deceiued . But,! do not comend the works of my hands:
for I feare, leaft when thou haft looked vpon them , thou iTialt tinde
moe finnes than merites.Only this I fay,thisl askejthis I defirc, de-
fpifenot the workes of thy handSjbeholdinme thy worke,not mine.
For if thou beholdeft mine,thou damneft me:if thou beholdeft thine,
chou crowneft me. For alfo whatfocucr good workes I haue,they arc
of thee.He fetteth two caufes, why he dare notboaft of his workes to
Godjbecaufeif he haue any good workes, he feeth therein nothing
his owne:fecondly, becaufe the fame is alfo oucrwhelmed with mul-
titude of finnes. Whereupon commeth to pafTe that the confciencc
feelcth therby more fearc & difmaying than affurednes.Therfore he
would haue God no otherwife to looke on his well doings, than that
reknowledging in them the grace of his calling,he may make an end
of the worke which he hath, begonne.
2 1 But furthermore wheras the Scripture {heweth that the good
workes of the faithful, are caufes why the Lord doth good to them,
that IS fo to be vnderftaded^that that which we haue before fee may
ftand vnfhaken , that the Eftcd of our faluation confifteth in the louc
of God the Fathcrtthe Matter, in the obediece of the Sonneithe In-
ftrumentjin the enlightning of the holy Ghoft, that is to fay,in faith;
that the cnde is the glory ofthefo great kind'jnefle of God. Thefc
things withftand not, but that the Lord may embrace workes as infc*
riour caufes.But whenfc commeth th.ic ? Namely whome the Lordc
of his mercy hath appointed to the inheritance of eternall life, them
with his ordinary difpenfition he doth by good workes biingc into
the poflfcffion thereof.That which irocth before in order ofdifpen-
iation, he callcih die caufe of that which followeth. After this man-
ner
The grace of Chrift, Lib.3. 322
ncr he fometime dcriueth eternal life from workesrnot for that is to
be afcnbcd to them:buc becaufe whom he hath chofen, the he doth Rom,
iuftific, that he may at length gloriHe them, hemaketh the grace 5*
that goeth before which is a ftep toward that which folowcth,after a
certame maner the caufe of it.Butfo oft as he hath occafio to afligne
the true caufe , he biddeth vs not to flee to workcs , but holdeth vs
in the oncly thmkinge vpon the mercy of God . For what manner
of thmge is this which he teacheih by the Apoftle, The rewarde of Rom.
finnc is dcath.-the grace of the Lordcjislife euerlaftinge ^ Why doth i j,
he not fee righteoufnelfe in comparifon againft finnc , as he fctteth
life agamft death?Why doth he not make righteoufnefle the caufe of
life,3S he makech finne the caufe of death ? For fo fliould the copari-
fon of contraries hauc ftande well together , which is much broken
by this turninge . But the Apoftle meant by this comparifon to ex-
prefle that which was trueth,that death is due to the deferuinges ot*
men : that life is repofedin the onely mercy of God. Finally in thefe
manners of fpeaking is rather exprelTed the order than the caufe ;be-
caufe God in heapinge graces vpon graces , taketh caufe of the fiift
to adde the (cconde , that he may leaue nothinge vndone to the en-
riching of his feruantes: and he focotinually extcndcth hisJiberahty,
that yet he would haue vs alvvay to looke vnto the free eled;i5 which
is fountaine and beginninge of it. For although he loucrh the giftes
which he daily giueth,infomuch as they fpring out of that fountaine:
yet it is our part to holde faft that free acceptation , which alone is a-
ble to vpholde our foules : as for fuch giftes of his Spirite as he after-
ward giueth vsjfo to adioyne them to the firft caufe, that they minifh
nothing of ic.
The XV. Chapter^
That thcje t hinges that are commonly boafled concerning the merites ofwort^^
do OHerthrovv as well the pratfe of God ingining ofrighteoufnejftj
Oialfo the affurednejfe of falaation.
NOw we haue declared that which is thechiefe point in this
matterrthat becaufe if righteoufnes be vpholde with works,
it muft needes byandby fall downe before the fight of God,
it is contained in the onely mercy of God , the onely com-
municating of Chrifl,and therefore in only faith. Bur, let vs diligently
markc that this is the chiefe ftay of the matter, leaft we be entangled
with that gcnerall errour,not only of the common peoplejbut alio of
learned men.For (o ^oone as queftion is moued of the iuftification of
faith & works^they flee to thofe places which feeme to giue to works
SS ij
Cap. I $• Of the maner how to receiae
fome merit in the fight of God: as though the iuftification ofworki
were fully wonne,if it be once proucd that they be of any value with
God. But we haue aboue plainely (hewed that the righteoufncffe of
workes confifteth only in the perfed & full keping of the law.Wher-
upon folowcth that no man is iultified by workes but he that hauing
climbed vp to y hieft top of perfedlion can not be proued gilty of any
oftenfc be it neucr fo litle. Thcrforc it is an other & a fcutral queftio:
Howfoeuer workes fuffice not to iuftific a man , whether yet do they
not deferuc fauour with God?
z Fiift of the name of mcrite T muft needes fay this afore handc,
that whofoeuer firft applied it to works of men copared to the iudgc-
ment of God,he did very ill prouide for the purenefTe of faith. True-
Jy I do by my good wil abftaine fi6 ftriues about wordes,but I would
vfiih. that this lobriety had alway bin vfed among Chriftian wryters,
that they wouldenot hauc founde in their heartesto vfe wordet
ftrange from the Scriptures, which engcndred much offenfe and nc
frute. For whereto , I bcfech you, was it needefull to haue the name
of Merite brought m, when the price of good woikc s might be fittc-
!y cxprcfled by an other name without offenfe «■ But howe much of-
fenfe that worde containeth in it , is euidcnt with the great hurt of
the worlde. Surely as it is moft proude it can do nothinge but darken
the grace of God, and fill men with froward pride. 1 he olde wryters
of the Churchjl graunt,haue commonly vfed it,and 1 would to God
they had not with the abufinge of one litle word giuen to poftcritic
matter of crrour . Howebeit they themfelues alfo do in many places
teftifie J howe in no cafe they meant to giue any preiudice agaynft
)« pre- the trueth . For thus fayeth Auguftine in one place , Let Merites of
eft. men here holde their peace, which haue penihedby Adam : and
'"^- lette the grace of God reigne, by Icfus Chrift. Againc , The faintcs
ro ^ ' P^^ nothing to their owne Merites : they will giue all to none but to
rphs 8 thy mercy , O God . In an other place. When man fceth that what*
foeuergoodhe hath, he hath it not from himfelfe, but from hit
God, hefeeththatall that which is praifedm htm, isnotof his
owne Mentcs.but of the mercy of God. You fee howe takinge from
men the power of doinge well > he alTo throwcth downe the digni-
tomil. ty of Merite. And Chryfoflome Hiy th,Our workes, if there be any,
j.in which folow the free calling of GoQ,arc repayment and det: bur the
»en. giftes of God are grace and bountifulneiTe ami the greamcfle of li-
berall giuingc - But, leaninse tlie name, let vs rather lookc vpon the
thin^e. 1 haue verily before alleaged a fcntencc out of Bernardc , As
it fufficeth to Merite , not to prefiime of Mcruesifo to want Mentcs,
ittfiicccb
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3 . 323
lufficcth to iudgement. Butbyaddingc forth with an expofiuon,
he fufficiently mitigateth the hardnefle of the worde, where he
faith : Theretorc care thou to haue Merites ; when thou haft them,
knowe that they are giuenrhope for frute,the mercy of God: and fo
thou haft efcaped alldanger,of pouerty,vnthankefulne(re,and prc-
(umption.Happy is the church which neither wanieth Meriics with-
out prefumption J nor prefumption without Merites , And a htlc be-
fore he hadde largely {hewed,liowe Godly a meaningc he vfed. For
of Merites ( fayth he ) why (houlde the Church be carefull, which
hath a ftedfafter and furer caufe to glorie of the purpofe of God ?
God can not deny hinifelfe,he wil do that which he hath promifed.
If there be no caufe why thou ftiouldeft aske , by what merites may
wc hope for goodtliingcs? Ipecially fith thouheareftitfayd> NotEte.
for your fikeSjbut for my fakent fufficeth to Merit, to know that Me- *»•
rites fufficc not.
5 What all our workes dcferue , the Scripture (he wcth when ic
fayth that they can not abide the fight of God,becaufe they are ful of
vnclcanneffetthen, what the perfed obferuing of the law(if any fuch
could be found)fhal dcferue,whcn it teachcth that we fhould thinkc
our felues vnprofitable feruantes when we haue done all things that Lyjj
arc commaunded vs: bccaufe we llial haue giue nothing freely to the lo,
Lordjbuc only haue performed our due feruiccSjto which there is no
thankc to be giuen . But thofe good worker which he himfelfe hath
giuen vs , the Lord both calleth ours and teftifieth that they are not
onely acceptable to him,but alfo that they flial hauereward.It is our
ducty againe for our parte, to be encouraged with fo great a pro-
mifc, and to gather vp our heartes, that we be not wearied with well
doinge , and to yeelde true thankefulnefte to fo great bountifulnefle
of God.It is vndouted y it is the grace of God whatfocuer there is in
workes that dcfcrueth praife : that there is not one droppe , which
wc ought properly to afcribe to our felues . This if we do trucly and
carnelUy acknowledge , there vanifheth away not onely all affiance
but alfo opinion of Merite . We ( I fay ) do not parte the praife of
good workes ( as the Sophifters do ) betwcnc God and man : but we
referue it wholc,perfed,and vnmimftied to the Lordc.OncIy this wc
ifTii^nc to man , that euen the fclfe fame workes that were good he
by his vncleanncfle corrupteth and defileth. For nothinge commcth
out of man, howc perfeft foeuer he be, that is not defiled with fome
fpot. Therefore let the Lord call into iudgement euen thcfc thinget
that are beft in the workes of menne: he ftiall verily efpic in them hi%
ownenghceoufneiTe^butoians dilhonefty and Hiame. Good WorkfS
S$ iii
Cap.i 5. Of the maner how-to rcceiue
therefore do plcafe God & are not vnproHcable to the doers of them,
but rather they receiue for rewardc the moft large benefites of God:
not becaufe they fo dcferue, but becaufe the goodneflfe of God hath
j of It felfe appointed this price vnto them . But what fpitefuInefTe is
thiSjthat men not cotented with that liberality of God, which giueth
vndue rewardes to workes that dcferue no fuch thing,do with ambi-
tion ful of facrilege endeuour further,that that which is wholly of the
liberahcy of God , may fecme to be rendered to the merites of men.
Here I appelle to the common iudgement of cuery man . If any man
that hath a taking of profit in a pecce of ground by an others mas li-
bcrall graunt, do alfo claimc to himfelfe the title of propriety : doth
he not by fuch vnthankefulnes deferue to loofe the very felfe pofTet^
fion which he had ? Likewife if a bondeflaue beingc made free of his
Liber- Lord,do hide the bafenes of the eftate of a Libertine,& boaft himfelf
Line,i$ to be a freeman borne : is he not worthy to be brought backc into
^^P^^^^ his former bondagcPFor this is the right vfe of enioying a benefite,if
by 'ma- ^^ neither claime to our felues more than is giuen , nor do defraude
numif the author of the benefite of his praife : but rather do fo bchaue our
fi5,not felues,thatth.it which he hath giuen from himfelfe to vs, may feeme
bybirch ^f^^^ ^ certainc maner to rcmaine with him. If this moderation be to
be kept toward men, let all men looke & confidcr what maner of mo-
deration IS due to God.
4 I knowe that the Sopbifters do abufc certaine places , to prouc
thtrby that the name of Merit toward God is found in the Scriptures.
EccliC They alleagc a fentence out of Hcclc(iafticus,Mercy (hall make place
>4 to euery man, according to the Merit of his workes. And out of the
Hcb. 1 3. Epiftle to the Hebrues, Forget not doing good and communicating,
'^* for with fuch facrificcs men merite of God . As for my right in reli-
ftin'j; the authority of Ecclefiafticus , I do now releafe it . Yet I deny
that 'jhey faithfully alleagc that which Ecclefiafticus,whatfoeuer wri-
ter he were,hath wrytten.For the Greeke copic is thus : ^*V« s\s>i/^»«
cdv-,;" TTOiitTH TtTTOVjI'.tstc-of ytto Kurai Tci if-ya. cUTa'u i WfiiVs/.He dial makc
place to euery mcrcy,& euery man flial finde according to his works.
And that this i* y true text , which is corrupted in the Latine tranfla-
tion,appeireth both by the framing of thcfe words, & by alogcrioy-
nin^, together of the fentence going before.In the Epiftle to the He-
brues , there is no caufe why they (hould fnare vs in one litlc worde,
when in the Greeke wordcs of the Apoftle is nothing elfe but that
fuch facrifices do pleafe and arc acceptable to God. This alone ought
largely to fuffice tofubdue & beitc downc the outragioufncs of our
pride, (hat we fainenot any worthinelTe to workes beyoode the rule
of
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. . 324
of Scripture. Now the dodrme of the Scripture is, that all our good
%vorkes are continually befprinklcd with many filthy Tpottes , wher-
with God may be worthily ofFtrnded and be angry with vs : fo fir is it
of, thac they be able to winne him to vs , or to prouoke his liberality
toward vs: Yet becaufe he of his tender kindenelTe doth not examine
them by extremity of law,hc taketh the as if they were moft pure, &
thcrfore though without merit, he rewardeth them with infinite be-
nefites both of this prefent life and of the life to come . For I do not
allowe the diftindion fet by men otherwife learned and godly : that
good workes deferue the graces that arc giuen vs in this life,and that
eternall life is the reward of faith alone.For the Lord doth common*
ly al'A^ay fet in heauen the reward of labors and the crowne of battel.
Ag^inc to giuc it fo to the merit of workes , that it be taken away fro
grace,that the Lord heapeth vs with graces vpon graccs^is againlt the
dodrine of the Scripture . For though Chrift faytb that to him that Mat.i
hathjihalbc giuen,and that the faithfulland good feruant which hath a».&2
fbcwfdhimfelfefaiihfullinfewe thinges, fhalbe fet ouer many: yet
he alfo flisiveth in an other place , that the encreafes of the faithfull
are the giftcs of his free goodnelTe. All yc that thirfl(fayth he)comc ^^
to the waters : and ye that haue not money jCome and bye milke and , ,
honie without money and without any cxchange.Whatfoeuer there-
fore is nowe giuen to the faithfull for help of faluation,yea and blef-
fednefl'e it felfe, is the meere hberality of God yet both in this And in
thofe he teftifieth that he hath confidcation of workes : becaufe j to
tcftifie the greatneffe of hisloue towarde vs, hcvouchfeueth to
graunt fuch honor not only to vs,but alfo to the giftes which he hath
giuen vs.
5 If thefe thinges had in the a^es paft bin handeled & difpofed in
fuch order as they ought to haue brn,there had neuer arifen fo many
troubles anddiflenfions.Paulfayththatinthe buildinge ofChriftian i.Cor,
dodrinCjWe muft kepe ftill that fundation which he had layed among 3 •»'•
the Corinthians , be(ide which no other can be layed : and that the
fame fundation is Icfus Chnlt. What maner of fundation haue we in
Chrift ? is it , that he v/as to vs the beginninge of faluation : that the
fulfilling thereof (hould follow of our feluesf and hath he but only o-
pened the way,by which we rtiould go forward of our owne ftregth {
Not fo : but , as he fayd a litle before , when we acknowledge him,
he is giuen to vs for righteoufne(re . No manne therefore is well
founded in Chrift , but he that hath full righteoufnefle in him : for-
afmuch as the Apoftle fayeth not that he was fent to helpe vs to ob« «Cfr,
WWCrighteoulhes,buc that he himfelfe might be our righteoufnefle, ^®*
SS iiij
Cap.i 5. Of the maner how to rccciue
>he.i. Namely ,that wc are chofen in him from eternitie before the making
of the world, by no dcferumg of oures, but according to the purpofc
u &' ^^ ^^^ good pleafurc of God : tiiat by his death we are redemed from
5, the damnation of death, and dcliuered from dcftrudion : that in him
we arc adopted of the heauenly father into children and hciresrthat
)h.xo by his bloud we are recoctlcd to the Fathenthat being geuen to hinj
*♦ to be kept we are deliucrcd fromperill of penfhing and of being
loft : that being fo engraScd in him , we are already after a certainc
manner partakers ofeternali life, being entred into the kingdomc
of God by hope : and yet more : that hauingc obteined fuch parta-
kmg of him,howe fo euer we be yet fooles in our felucSjheis wifdom
for vs before God : ho wfoeucr we be finners, he is righteoufncfle
for vs;howfoeuer we be vncleane, he is cleannefle for vs:howfoeuer
we be weake , howfoeucr vnarmed and lieng open in danger of Sa-
tan, yet oures is the power which is geuen him in heauen and earth,
'.ic.iS whereby he may treadedowne Satan for vs, and breake the gatesoF
hclles : howfoeuer we ftill cary about with vs the body of death, yet
he is life for vs : brcfely that all his things arc oures , and wc in hira
baue all things , in our felues nothing : vpon this foundation. I fay, it
behourth that we be builded, if we will encreate into a holy temple
to the Lorde.
• 6 But the world hath a longc time bene othcrwife taught. Fof
there haue bene found out I wote not what morall good workcs,by
which men may be made acceptable to God before that they be
T I ^ grafted m Chrift. As though the Scripture lictb , when it faith , that
■ ' they are all in death which banc not poffefled the Sonne. If rhey be
u;Ti.i4 Jn death, howe fliould they bring forth matter of life f As though ic
J. were of no more force, y whatfoeucr is done without faith , is finne:
as thougli there may be good frCites of an euell tree. But what haue
thefcmoft peftilcnt Sophifters left to Chrift wherin he mayHiewe
forth his power?Thcy fay that he hath deferued for vs the firft grace,
namely the occafion of deferuing rthatic is nowe our part not to
fade the occafion offred. O defperate fhamelcfnefle of vngodlinclfc-
Who would haue thought th:it men profeffing the name of Chrift,
durft fo ftrippe him naked of his power, and in a manner trcade hinn
vnderfooie?Thistcftimonie is eche where fpokcn of him, that all
they are iuftificd that belcue in him : thefe fellowes teache,that there
commeth ff om him no other bcncfir,but thiSjthat the way is opened
Coh.5, toeucry man to iuftific himfclft*. But I would to God they taftc<l
''^ what thefc fayings meancahat all they haue hfc that haue the Sonne
^ ' ' of God : that whofoeuer beleueth , is already pafted from death in-
to
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 525
to life : that wcare iulbfied by his grace.that we might be made Rom,
hcircs of eternalllifc : that the faiihfull haue Chrift abidingc in *4'
them, bywhomc they clcaue faft to God: that they which are par- '* °
takers of his life , do lit with himinheauenly places ; that they arc tph,
tranfplantecl into the kingdomc of God, and haue obteined faluauo. 6.
and innumerable other fuch. For they do not dcclarc,that there co- ^"'°
meth by the faith of Chrift nothing but y power to obteine righte- ' ^*
oufneire or faluation , but that they are both geuen to vs. Therefore
fo fone as thou art by faith engrafted into Chrift, thou art aheady
made the fonne of Godjthe heire of h€auen,partaker of rjghteoaf'
neffc , pofteiforoflife ,and (that their lies may be better confuted^
thou haft not obteined the fit abihcie to dcferue, but cuen all the dc-
feruinges of Chrift : for they are communicated to thee.
7 So the SorbontcalfcholeSjthemorhers of all errourSjhauc ta-
ken from vs the iuftificatio of faith whichisthefumme of allgodli-
neftl'. They i^raunt verily in worde , that man is iuftified by formed
faith : but this they afterward expound , becaufe good workes haue
of faith this that they auaile to righteoufnefl'e • that they feme in a
manner to name faith in mock:^ge, fith without great enuicnifnelle ic
could not be paifed ouer in lilcnce, fcingit is fo oft repeted of the
Scripture.Andnotyetc6tented,they doin thepraifeofgood works
pnuilie fteale from God fomwhat to geue away to man.Becaufc they
fee that good workes litle auaiic to aduaunce man,and that they can
not be properly called Merites,if they be accompted the frutes of the
grace of God : they picke them out of the ftrcngth of free will, oylc
forfooth out of a ftone. And they denic not in deedc that the prin-
cipal! caufe of them is in grace : but they aftirme that thereby is not
excluded free \vill,by which is all merit. And this notonely the latter
Sopifters do teach, but alfo their Pythagoras, Lombard: whome if l-br.
you compare with thefe men , you may lay to be found witted and '^'^•'
fobie.It was truely a point of maruelous bhndencfl'e, that when they
had Augurtinc fo oft in their mouth , they fawc not with howe great
carefulnefle that man prouided that no peece of the gloric of good
workes were it ncuer fo litlc,fliould be conucycd to men. Here before
where we entreated of free wil,we recited certain teftimonies of his
to this purpofe,of which fort there are oftetimcs found many like in
his wrytinges : as when he forbiddeth vs that we fliould no where
boft of our mcriies , becaufe cuen they alfo are the giftes of God:
And when he wricech , that all our merite is onely of grace , that it is ^" ^^^
not gotten by our fufficience,butisallmade bygracc,&c. It is no p^fA
marucli that Lombard was blinde at the light of the Scripture , in loj. '
Cap. 1 5. Of the maner how to receiuc
whiche itappereth that he was not Co well pradifed. Yer nothing
could be dcfired more plaine againft him and his difciples, than this
^ ** word of the Apoftle, Forwhenheforbiddeth Chriftiasall gloricng,
he adioincth a reafon why it is not lawetull to glorie : becauic wc arc
that handiworke of God , created to all good workes,that we (hould
%valke in ihem.Sith therefore there cometh out of ys no good fhmg,
but in fo much as we be regenerate : and our regeneration is whole
of God without exccptionuhere is no right why we fhould claimc to
our felues one ounce in good workes. Finally whereas they cotinually
call vpon good workeSjin the mcane time they fo inftrucl confcien-p-
ces,that they neuer dare haue affiancejthat they haue God wcl plea**
fed and fauorable to their workes. But contrariwife we>without ma-
king any mention of Merite,do yet by our dodrine raife vp the cou^
rages of the faithfull with fingular comfort,when we teach them that
in their workes they pleafe God,and are vndoutedly accepted vnto
him. Yea and alfo here we require that no man attempt or go about
any workc without faith, that is to fay, vnlefle he do fiift with affurcd
confidence of minde determine that he fnall pleafe God.
8 Wherefore let vs not fuftcr our fclues to be led fo much as one
hcare bredth away from this onely foundation : which being layed,
''on«3 ^yife builders do afterward well & orderly builde vpon it. For if there
*p^j. be neede of dodrine and exhortation, they put men in minde j that
the Sonne of God hath appered to this ende,that he may deitroy the
.Tim. workes of the dcuell : that they fhould not tinne which are of God,
•*^* that the time paft is enough for the fulfilling of the defiresofthe Ge-
'"'^*^' tiles: that theeled of God are vefl'els of mercicchofenout vnto
honour,which ought to be made cleane from all filthinefle.But all is
fpoken at oncs,when it is {hewed that Chrift wil haue fuch difciples,
which forfaking ,themfelucs, and taking vp tlieir croffe , do followc
him.He that hath forfakcn himfelfc,hath cut of the roote of all euels,
that he may no more fekethofethinges that arc his owne. He that
hath taken vp his croflcjhath framed himfelfetoall patience and
mildenefle. But the example of Chrift conteineth both thefe and all
other duties of godlinefle & holinefle.He Ihcwed himfelfe obedient
to his father,euen to the death : he was wholly occupied in doing the
workes of God : he with his whole heart breathed out the glorie o£
his father : he gaue his foulc for his brethren : he both did good and
wifhed good to his enemics.If there be ncedc of comfort,thcfe will
I Cor. bring maruelous comfort , that we be ina(fl'dion,bucwe are not
l.ii. made carefuUrthat we labour,but we are not forfakenrwe are brought
loweibut wc are not confounded : ws are throwcn downe^but we dp
not
The grace of Chrift, Lib. 3. ^26
not pcrifli : alway bearing about with vs in our body the mortitying
of fefus Chrift, that the hfe oFIefus may be manifeftly fliewcd in vs, x.Tim.
that if we be dead with him, we iliall alto hue together with him ; if ^:
wc fuflfci- with him , we lliall alforcigne together with him : that we ^^^ * ^'
be Co falliioned hke to his fuffringes, till v/e atteine to the likencile of
his refurrcdion : For afmuch as the Father hath predeftinatc thefe to Rom. 8,
be fafhioncd hkcthe image of his fonne ,whome , m him he hath *^*
chofen,that he may be the firft begotten among all his brethren:and
therefore chat neither de3th,nor prefent ihings,nor things to come,
ihall feuervs from iheloueof God which is m Chrift; but rather
all things fhall turne to vs to good and to faluation. Loe, we do not
iuftifie a man by workcs before God : but we fay that all they that
are of God, arc regenerate and made a newe creature, that they may j.rct.i
pafle out of the kingdome of (inne into the kingdome of righteouf- lo.
tiefle , and that by this teftimonie they make their calling certainc, '
and are iudged as trees by the frutes.
The xvj. Chapter.
xAeonfutation of the fclaunders , whereby the Pacifies go about tt
bring this docirine tn hatred.
With th'5 one word may the llinmclefnefte of certaine
vngod'y me be contuted which fclaunder vs with faying
that vv'c aeftroy good workes*, and do drawe men away
from the foUov/ingof them,when we fay that they arc
not iuftificd by workes , nor do deferue faluation : and againe , that
wc make to eafy a way to righteoufneffe, when we teach that it lieth
in the free forgeuenefife of finnes,and that we do by this enticement
allure men to finne, which arc of their owne will too much endined
iherto already.Thefe (claunders (I fay) are with that one word fuffi-
ciently confutcdryct I will brefcly anfwer to them both. They allege
that by the iuftification of faith , good workes arc deftroycd. I leauc
vnfpoken,what maner of men be thefe zelous louers of good workes
which do fo backbite vs. Let them haue licence as freely to rayle as
they do liccntioufly infed the whole world with th^ filthinefle of
their life. They fainc that they be greued, that when faith is fo glo-
rioufly aduaunced,workes are driuen downe out of their place.V^hat
if they be more raifed vp , and ftabli(hed<? For neither do wc dreamc
of a faith voide of good workes, nor a iuftification that is without
them. This onely is the di fference , that when wc confclTe that faith
and good workes do neceflarily hang together , yet we fet iuftifica-
don m faithpoc in works.For what rcafon we do fo,wc hauc in rcdi«
Cap.i 6. Of the mancr how to rcceiuc
neffe eaiily to declare, if we do but turne to Chrift vnto whomc ouf
faifh is direded , and from vvhome it r'eceiueth her whole ftrength.
Why therefore are we iuftified by faith ? bycaufc by faith we take
holde of the rightcoufnefTe of Chrift,by which alone we are recon-
ciled to God. But this thou canft not take holde of,but that thou muft
alfo therewiihall take hold of fandification.For he was geuen to vs,
.Cor. for righteoufncflejwifdome, fandificaiioii, and redemption. There*
}"• fore Chrift iuftifieth none whom he doth not alio fandifie.For thefc
benefites are coupled together with a perpetuall and vnfeparablc
knot, that vvhome he enlighteneth vvirh his wifdome, them here-
dcmeth : whome he redemeth,he iuftifieth : whcnic he iulhfieth, he'
fanftifieth.But for afmuch as our queftion is onciy of righteoufneire
§ndfandifying,letvsftay vpon thcfe. VVemaypi;c difference be-
iwene them , yet Chrift conteineth them both vnkparably in him-
.felfc. Wilt thou therefore obteinenghceoufnefre in Chnfr^Thou
muft firft poirdTe Chrift : and thou cauft not poifctVe bim , but thac
thou muft be made partaker of his fand'hcation.bscaufe he can not
be torne in peeces.Sith therefore the Lorde doth s;raunc vs theie be-
nefices tobeenioyed none otherwile than ingeu)ngh»rn!clfe,hc
gcucth them both together,the one neuer without che othcr.So ap-
percth how true it is , that we are iuftifird not Without workei , and
yet not by works : becaufe in the partsking of Chrift,whcrby we ar^
luftificdjis no lefTe conteined fandification than rightcoufnefTe.
X That alfo is moft falfe,that the mindes of men are wuhdrawen
ftom the affcdion of weldoing, when we take from them the opi-
nion of meriting. Here by the way the readers muft be warned , that
ihcy fooliihly reafon from reward to ment,as I ftiall afterward more
plainely declare : namely becaufe they know not this principle , that
God is no leffe libcrallwhen heafligneth reward to workes , than
whenhegeueth power to do well. But this I had rather diflferreto
, the place fit for it.Now it fhalbe enough to touch howc weakc their
obie<ftion is : which fhalbe done two wayes.For firft whereas they C^y
that there fhalbe no care of well framing of life, but when hope o£
reward is fet before them : they erre quite from the truth. For if this
onely be entended when men fcrue God , that they loke to reward,
or let out to hire or fell their labors to him , they litle preuayle : for
God will be fireely worihipped,freely loued: he (1 fay) alloweth thac
Worfhipper , which when all hope of rcceiuing reward is cut of, yet
ccffeth nottoworfhippe him . Morocuer if men be to be pricked
forward,no man can put (harper fpurres vnto them , than thofe that
arc taken of (he cndc of our redemption and calling : fucb as the
word
The grace of Chrift. Lib.5. 327
trordofGod fpurrethmenwithall, whcnit teacheth.that it is to
wicked vnthankcfulneHc 5 not mutually toJoue him againe which
firft loucd vs : that by the blood of Chrift out cofcienccs arc dcanfed
f;om dead workes , to feme the huing God : that it is a hainous fa- Htb.^
cnlegc , if being ones deanfcd, we defile our felues with newc tilthi- m*
ncfle,and prophane that holy blood : that we are deliuered from the Luc.i.
handes of our enemie<!,that we may without feare fcruc him in hoh- ^^*
ntfle and riehteoufnefle before him all thcdaycs of ourhfe: that
we arc made free from (inne ,that we may with a free Spirit foUowc Rom.tf*
righteoufnes:that our olde man is crucified, that we may rife againc
into newnelfe of life : againe that if we be dead wuh Chnft (as be- Colo.f»
commeth his members) we muft feekc thofe things that arc aboue, ».
andmuft mthe world bewaifaring men from home, that we may Tit.>,
long toward heauen where is our treafure : that the grace of God *
hath appered to this ende,that forfaking all vngodlinclle and world- -''
ly defires, we may Hue foberly, holily> and godlily in this world, lo-
king for the blelTed hope and the appermg of the glorie of the great
God and fauiour : therefore that we are not apointed tliat we (hould
flirre vp wrath to our felues , but that wc may obteine faluation by ^ .-j^
Chrift : that we are the temples of the Holy Ghoft , which it is not ^\^^
lawful! to be defiled:that we are not darkencflcjbut light in the Lord, uCor. j
which muft walkc as childrenof light: that wc are not called to ^^'
rncleanneflc , but to hobnefte : becaule this is the will of God ,our ^P^'-*-
fan6hfication,that we abfteine from vnlawfull defiresrthat our calling ^ g^
is holy, that the fame is not fulfilled but with purenefl'c of life : that a.Cor.<
wc are for this purpofe deliuered from finne,th3t we Ihould obey to ».TlieC
TightcoufnclTc.Can we be pricked forward to chantic with any more "^'7'.
liuely argument than that of Iohn,that we (hould mutually loue one '
an other as God hath loued vs ? that herein his children do differ Rom. 6,
from the children of the Deucll, the children of light from the chil- x8.
dren of darken eflfejbycaufc they abide in loue? Againe with that Io*»«if»
argument of Paule , that we if we cleaue to Chrift, arc the members Jjql «^
of one body , which it is mete to be holpcn one of an other with n ,
mutuall duties ? Can we be more ftrongly prouoked to holincfle^than i.Cor.
when wc hcarc againe of John, that all they that hauc this hope, do ^*7- &.
fandific themfelucs, bycaufc their God is. holy? Againe of y mouth * j *l*
of Paule : that hauing the promife of adoption , we Ihould clcanfc V
our felues from all the defiling of the fkfh and fpirite ? than when a.Coa
wc hearc Chrift fetting forth i imfclfc for an example vnto vs thac 7-^
wc Ihould follow his fteppes?
5 And chelc fewe things 1 h;iuc fee forth for a caft.For if I fl^ould
Cap. 1 6, Of the maner how to rcceiuc
cntende to go through all , I ihoulde be driucn co make a longc vo-
lume. The ApolKes aic all full of encouragementcs, exhortations Sc
rebukingSjwhcrby they may inftrud the man of God to euery good
worke, and that without any mention of mcrite. But rather they
fetch their chicfe exhortatios from this that our faluationltandcth
vpon the onciy mercie of God and vpon no meritc of ours. As
Paule, after that lie hath in a whole Epiftle difcourled that there is
lo. 1 a. no hope of hfe for vs but in the righteoufnefTc of Chrift , when he
'• commeth downe to moral exhortations, he befecheth them by that
mercy of God which he hath vouchfaued to extend to vs. And true*
ly this one caufe ought to haue bin fufficient, that God may be glori-
Mace. 5. ficdinvs. But if any be not fo vehemently moucd with the glory of
itf. God, yet the remembrance of his benefites ought to hauc bin, moft
fufficient, to ftirre vp fuch men to do well. But thefe men, which do
paraduenturc with thrufting in of mcrites beatc out fome feruile &
conftrained obediences oftheIaw,dofaHly fay that we haue nothing
whereby we may exhorte menne to good workes, bccaufe we go not
Chry- the fame way to worke. As though G^d were much delited with
foft.ho fuch obediences, which protefteth that he loueth a cherefuU g»ucr,
^' • "* & forbiddeth any thing to be giuen as it were of heauines or of nc-
x.Co'r.^ ccflity.Neitherdo I fpeake this for that I do either refufc or defpifc
f, that kinde of exhortation , which the Scripture oftentimes vfeth,
that it may leaue no meane vnattempted eucry way to ftirre vp our
mindes.For it rehearfeth the reward which God will render to euery
man accordinge to his workcs.But I deny that that is the only thing,
yea or the chicfc among many. And then I graunt not that we ought
to take beginninge thereat, Moreouer I affirme that it maketh no-
thingc to the fettrnge vp of fuch mcrites as thele men boaft of, as we
fliall hereafter fee. Laft of all I fay that is to no profitable vfc, vnlcffc
this doctrine haue firft taken place,rhat we are iuftified by the-Qncly
merite of Chrift , which is conceiued by faith but by no merites of
our workeSjbecaufe none can be fitre to the endeuour of holinefle,
vnlcfle they haue firft digefted this dodrine . Which thingc alfo the
Pfa.1 30 Prophet very well fignifieth , when he thus fpeakcth to God : With
thee is mercy, that thou mayft be feared. For he (he wcth that there is
no worfliippinge of God,but when his mercy is acknowlcdged,vpon
which alone it is both founded and ftabhlhcd. Which is very worthy,
to be noted , that we may knowe not oncly that the beginninge of
worlhippinge God aright is the affiance of his mercy , but alfb that
the feare of God ( which the Papiftes will haue to be meritorious^
can not baue die name of mericc , bccaufe it is grounded vpon the
pardon
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 328
pardon and forgeuenefle of finncs.
4 But it is a moft vaync fclaunder, that men arc allured to finnc,
when wc affirme the free forgeucnefTe of finnes,jn which we fay chat
righteoufneffe confifteth. For, we fay that it is of (o great value, that
it can with no good of ourcs be recompenfed , and that therefore it
fhould neuer be obteinedjVnlcflfe it were fiecJy gcue.Moreouer that
it is to vs in deede freely geucn,butnoc fo to Chrift which bought it
fo derely, namely with his owne moft holy bloud.bifide which there
was no price of value enough that might be paied to the iudgement
of God. When menne are raught thefe things,they are put in minde
that it is no thanke to them that the fame moft holybloud is not
filed fo oft as they finne. Furthermore we learne, that our filthineflc
is fuch , as is neuer v/aflied away but with the fountaine of this moft
pure bio ud , Ought not they that heare thefe things , to conceiuc a
greater horrour of finne > than if it were faid that it is wiped away
with the fprinklingof goodworkes? Andifrhey hauc any thing of
Godjhowc can they but dred being ones cleanfed,to wallowe them-
(elues againe in the mire, as much as in them Ueth to troble & mfc^
thepurenelTe of this fountaine? I haue wafhed my fee te (faith the
faithfull foule in Salomon) how Ihall I againe defile them ? Now it is Cant 5,
cuidet,whether fort do both more abace the forgeuenefle of finncs, 3«
and do more make vile the dignitic of rightcoufncfl*c. They babble
that God is appeafed with their owne trifling fati*fadios,thatis, their
donge : We affirme that the giltincfle of (inneis more greuous than
can be purged with fo light triftesrthat the difpleafure of God is
more heauie than can be relcafed with thefe fatisfadions of no va-
lue, and that therefore this is the prerogatiueofthe onelybloudc
of Chrift. They fay that rightcoufnes (if it failc at any time) is refto-
red and repaired by fatisfadorie workes : wc thinke it more precious
than that it can be matched with any rccompenfe of workes, and
that therefore for the reftoring thereof we muft flee to the onely
mercieof God. As for the reft of thofe thinges that perteinc to the
forgeuenefle of finncs,let them be fought out of the next chapter.
N
The xvij. Chapter.
Tht agreeraent eftbepromifes tfthe Uwe and theGcfptQ,
Ow let VS alfo go through the other arguments wherewith
Satan by the foldiars of his garde , goeth about cither to
ouerthrowc or batter the iuftification of ftith.This I thinke
we haue already wrong ^om the fciaunderer»,tliat they caj|
Cap. 1 7. Of the maner how to receiuc
no more charge vs as enemies ofgoodvvorkes. For, 1 unification is
taken away from good workcs , noc that no good workes fliould be
donCjOr that thofe whjch be done iLould be denied to be good, but
that we fliould not put afhace m them,not glone in them,noi afcribc
faluation to them. For this is our affiance, this is our glone , and the
onely authour of our faIuation,that Chnft the fonne of God is our$>
and we Hkewife are in lum y fonnes of God,and heycrs of the heauc-
\y kingdome,being called by the goodnelfe of God,not by cur ownc
worthinefle, into the hope of eternall bleffedneife. But bycaufe they
do bifide thefe afl'aile vs,as we haue faid , with other engines, go to*
let vs go forward in beating away thcfc alfo.Fiift th.y comebacketo
thepromifes of the lawe, which the Lorde did fet forth to the kepers
of his lawe : and they afke whether wc will haue them to be vtietly
voidc orcfFefiuall.Bycaufe it were an abiurditie and to be fcorned to
fay that they are voide,they take it for cofefled that they are of fomc
ciFedualneffe.Hereupon they reafon that we are not iuitiHed by only
UC.7. faith.For thus faith the Lorde: And it iWbejif thou flialt heare thefc
commaundemcntes and iudgcmentes , and fliall kepe them and do
them , the Lorde alio fhall kepe with thee his couenant and mcrcic
which he hath fworne to thy fathers, he fhal loue thee and multiplic
c. 7. thee, and bleffe thee , &c. Againe , If yc fliall well dirc<fl: your waycs
^ ^3- and your endeuors,if ye waikc not after ftrange Gods,if^yc do iudgc-
ment between man and man , and go not backe into malice , 1 will
walke in themiddeft of you.I will not recite a thoufand pecesofthc
fame (brte , which flth they nothing difftr in fenfe , fli?-lbe detlared
u. 1 1 by the folution of thcfe,ln a fumme,Mofes teft':ficth that in the lawe
• is fet forth blefling and curfe,dcath & hfe.l hus thcrfore they reafon,
that either this blefling is made idle and fruteltflcjOr thatiuftificatio
is not of faith alone. Wehauealready beforefhevved,howeif we
fticke faft in the lawe,ouer vs being defiitute of all bleffing ,hangeth
onely curfe which is threatnedto all tranfgreflbrs.For the Lord pro*
niifeth nothing but to the perfed kepers of his lawe , fuch as there i»
• none found.This thcrfore remaineth,that all mankindc is by the lav*
accufed,and fubied to cuifc and the wrath of God : from which that
they may be loofed , they muft needes go out of the power of the
law,& be as it were brought into libertic from th(^ondagc thereof:
Dot that carnall hbertie which fliould wiihdrawc^vs from the keping
of the lawe , fliould allure vs to thinke all things lavrfull and ro fufFer
our liift,as it were the ftaycs being broken & with loofe reines to run
at riot : but the fpirituall hbertie , which may comfort and raife vp a
difmayed and ouerchrowen confcience,ihcwing it to be free from
the
The grace of Ch rift. Lib.j. 337
place they arc comaunded to worke the meate which pcrifl'^eth not, lohn. «
when by beleuing in Chuft they gecte to thcmfclucs hfe:and yet it is ^7«
byandby afterward added : Which the fonneof man ShsU giueyoa.
Whcrby appeareth j the word of Workihg is not fct as contrary to
grace.but is referred to endv:uour:& therfore it folovveth noc,y either
the faithful arc thefeUies authors of their ovvne ra!uation,or thn the
fame proccdcth from their woukes. How then f bo foonc as they arc
taken into the felowditp of Chnft^by the knowledge of the Gofptrl,
& the enhghtningof the holy Ghoft , eternall hfc is bcgonne in the.
Nowe the (ame good vyorke which God hath begonne in the, muft p, ..
alfobemadeperfcdvnnlthc day ofthelordleru.Anditismadcper*- 5, * *
fedjwhen relcmblmg the heaucnly father in righteoufncy & hohncs,
they proue themftUies to be his children not fwarued out of kindc.
z There is no caufc why we (hould of the name of rcvvarde gather
an argument that our workes are the caufe of faluation. Firft let this
be determined in our hcartcs that the kingdom of hcaiie is not a re-
ward of feruantSjbutan inlicntance of children, which they only flial
cnioy,that are adopted of the lord to be his children- & for no other Eph.i,
caufe, but for this adoption. For, the fonne of rhc bond womnn Hi all rZ.
not be heir,but the fonne of the free woma. And in the very fame pla G»l3'4
ces , in.which the holy Ghoft promifcth to workes eternall glory for ^^
reward,in exprcffing the inheuMnce by namc,he flicwerh that it Co-
meth fro elfc where. So Chrift rehearfcth workcs.which he ret open- w^
feth with the rewarding of heaucn, when he calleth rhc clcdt 10 the J^, *
pofllffio thcrof:but he therwiihal adiointth that it muft be poUcffed
byrightofiniientance. So Paule biddeth feruantes, which do their Colo. 3
duety^aithfully,to hope for reward oftle lord;buthe addeth, of in- '4«
heritance.Wc fee how they do as ic were by expreffc wordes prouide
that we impute not eternal blclfednes to workes, but to the adoption
of God. Why therfore do they therewithall together m.ike mention
of workes ? This qucftion {halbe made plaine with one example of
Scripture.Beforethc birth of Ifaac,thcre was promifed to Abraham a Gen. tc
feede in which all the nations of the earth (hould be bleirccl:& a mul- 5 & 17
tiplying of his fedc,whichihould match the ftarresof thcskie,&ihe ^« '?
fandcs of the fca,& other like. In many yeares afterward, Abraham,
as he was commaunded by the oracle , prepared him(elfe to cjffer vp
his fonne in facrifice . When he had perrormed this obedience , he
rcceiued a promife.I hauefworneby my ftlf( faith the Lord)becaufc q^^, ^j
thou haft done this thing, & haft not fpared thine owne only begot- j.Sc'i.7,
ten fonne, I wil bleflfe thee di multiply thy feede as the ftarres of the
$kic,& the fandes of the fcauhy feede fhai poflcfte the gates of their
VV
Cap.iS, Of the maner how toreceiuc
enemies , and all the nations of the earth (halbe bleffed in thy fcedc,
becaufe thou hoftobcicd my voice. What hcare we/ Hath Abraham
by his obedience deferued the blelfingcthe promife whereof he had
recciued before that the commiundemcnt was giuen?Here verily we
haue It without circumftances fhewed,y the lord rewardeth the works
of the faitliful with thofe benefices which he had already giucn them
before that the workes were thought of,hauing,yet no caufe why he
fliould do good to them but his owne mercy.
g Yet doih the Lord not deceiue nor mocke vs when he faith that
he rendreih for reward to works the fame thing which he had before
workcs fiecly g'uen. For, becaufe he wil haiie vs to be exercifed with
£ood workes , to thinke vpon the deliuery or enioyinge ( as I may Co
call it)of thefc things which he hath promifed,and to runne through
them to the bleflcd hope fet before vs in heauen,the frute of the pro*
mifes is alfo rightly aflisncd to them, to the ripeneffe wherof they do
not bring vs.The Apoftie very fitly expreflfed both thefe pointes,whe
he fayd that the ColofTians apply themfelues to the dueiies of cha*
rity,for the hope which is laied vp for them in heauen^of which they^
0I0.1 , had before heard by the word of the true fpeaking Gofpel. For when^^
he fiyth that they knewe by the Gofpelljthat there was hope layd vp^^B
for ihcminheaiicn,he declareth that the fame is by Chrift only,noc
vnderproppcdv/ith any workes. Wherwith accordeth that faymgof
Pe. I. Pcter> that the godly are kept by the power of God , through faith,
vntothe fjluation which is ready to be manifeftly (hewed at the time
appointed for it.Whe he fayth that they labor forit,he fignifierh that
the fliithful mud runne all the time of their life,that they may actaine
to ir.Bur Icaft we {houldc thinke chat the reward which the Lord pro-
mifeth vs,is not reduced to the meafure of merite,he did putfoorth a
lat.i 2. parable,in which he made himfeif a houfeholder,which fent all them
that he mct,to the trimming of his vineyard/ome at the firft houre of
the day,fome at y fecond, fome at y third, yea & fome alfo at the 1 1.
Ateueninqehepayed toeuery one egall wages. The cxpofition of
which par^blcjthat fame old v/ryter v/hatfocueriie was,whofe bookc
is caried abroade vnder the name of Ambrofe of the callirvge of the
GentilfSjhath bricfely and rruely fet out. I will vfe rather his wordes
i.i.ea than mine owne.l he Lorde(rivthhe)by the rule of this comparifon
hath ftabliihcd the diucrfity of manifoldc calling, belonginge to one
grace: where without dout they which being let into the vineyard at
the I i.houre,are made egall with rhcm that had wrought the whole
day,dorrpreiirnttheeftatc of them, whom for the aduancingof the
excellency of grace , the tender kindcncs of the lord hath rewarded
at
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 338
at the waning of the day, and at the endinge of their lifcinot payingc
wages for their labour^but pouring out rhe richefle of his goodncfle
vpon them whom he hath chofen without woi kesj that eucn they al-
C(} which haue fwet in great lobour,3nd haue rccciued no more than
the iait^may vnderftand th.it they haucreceiueda gifcofgracc,nota
reward ot workes. Lr.ll ofalijthis alfo js worthy to be noted m thefc
placcSjwhere eternall hfe is called the reward of workes,that it i« not
fimply taken (or the comunicating which we haue witU God to blef-
fedimmoitahty, when he tmbraccth vswith fatherly good will in
Ghrift:buc for the pofl'eflfing or cntoying (as they call st)of blefied- Mat.io,
ncs,asalfo the very words o\ Chrift do found. In time to come life e- ?o.
uerlafting.And in another place^Come & poflcflc the kingdom,&c. ^^^^'^5
Altcrihi^ manerPaui callethadoptiojthcreuealing of the adoption ^"^'^ ^
which fhalbc made in the refui redion: and afterward expoundcth it , jj.
the redemption of our body. Otherwifc as cftrangmge fiom God is
eternall death , fo when man is rcceiued of God into fauovir,rhat he
may enioy thecommunicatinge of him & be made one wuh him, he
is receiued from death ro life.which is done by rhe beneficial meane
f adoptio only. And if,as ihey are wont,they ftiffely enforce the re- ipe.i,
ward of works,we may lurne agamft them that fayinge of Peter, that 9.
eternall life is the reward of faith.
4 Therefore let vs not thinke, that th<! holy Ghoft doth with fuch
promife fct forth the worthincffe of our workes,asif they defenied
fuch rewardjFor y Scripture leaueth nothing to vs, whereof we may
be aduaunced m the light of God. But rather it wholly endeuoreth
to beaiedowne our arrogancc,to humble vs,to throw vs downCjsnd
altogether to brcake vs m peeces. But our weakenes is fo fuccoured,
which otherwife would byandby (lip & fall downe, vnlelle it did fu-
ftaineit felfe with thisexpedation, and mitigate her tedious giieues
withcomfort.Firfthowharditis forama toforfake & deny not only
all histhinges,but alfo himfelfcjlet cuery manconfider for himfelfe.
And yet with thisintiodudio Chrift traineth his fchollcrs^that is^all
the godly. Then throughout all their life he fo inftrudeth the vndcr
the difciphne of the croffe , that they may not fct their heart either
to the defire or cofidence of prefent good things. Briefl y he fo hand-
leth them for the moft part, that which way locuer thcv turnc their
cies throughout the whole widenelfr of the worlde,they haue on c- -
ucrv fide nothing but defperation prefent before ihcm:ro that Paulc
fayth,that we are more miferable then all men if our hope be onely
in this world. That they llioulde not faint in thefe fo great diftrefles,
the lord is prefent with them, which puttcth them in mind to lift vp
V V 1}
Cap. 1 8. - ' Of the maner how torccciuc
*or. their headc hier,to calt iheir eies furcher,y they finde with him the
'^ blefl'ednes which they fee not in y world. This bleflcdnes he calltth^
rcw3rd,wages,recompenre, not weying the merit of workcSjbut (i-
giiifying that it is a rccopcnHng to their troubleSjfufFeringeSjfclaun-
dcvs.&c.Whcrforc nothing wjthftandeth5butywc may after the ex-
ample of the Scripturcjcall cternall life a rewardmg, becaufe in it the
Lord receiueth his from labors into reft,fr6 affli(fbo into profperouj
& happy ft3tQ,from forrow into gladnes, from pouerty into flowinge
wcalihjfro fliame into glory,& changeth al the euils which they hauc
futired for greater good things.So it (hal alfo be no inconuenience,if
wc thinke holmes of life to be a way,not which openeth an entry in-
to the glory of the heauenly kingdom, but whereby the eled are led
jm 8. ^f their God into y difclofing of it: forafmuch as this is his good will,
1. * to glorifie them whom he hathfanAified. Only let vs not imagine a
correllatio of merit & reward, wherin the Sophifters do fondly ftick
faftjbecaule they confider not this end which we fet forth. But how
vnorderly is ir,whe the lord calleth vs to one end,for vs to iokc to an
other ? Nothingc i> more cuident,ihan that rcwarde is promifcd to
good workes , torel'.euetheweakcneflcof ourficfh withfome con-
forie , not to puffe vp our mindcs with glory. Whofoeuer therefore
doth therby gather the merit ofworks,or doth in one balance weyc
worke with rewardjhe errcih farre from the right marke of God.
"^'^•4 ^ Whcrfore whenthe Scripture faith that God the iufliudgewil
u". ad ori<^ ^'^y render to his a crownc of righicoufneffc, I do not only take
ale ic. excepnon with Auguihnej and fay: To whom (houJd he being a iuft
- g'"'^- iudgcrenderacrowne, ifhe had not beinge a mcrcifull father giuen
,''.^" grace rand liow fhould there be righteoufnes, vnleflc grace went be-
fore which iullificth the vnrighteous ? How fliould thefc due thingef
be rendered.vnlcfTe thefc vndue thinges were firft giuen ?But alfo I
adde an other thinge. Howe fhould he impute righteoufncfle to our
workcs,vnleire his tender mcrcifulncfl'c did hide the vniightcoufncs
that is in them ? How fhould he iudge them worthy of reward , vn-
lefTe he did by immeailirable bountifulnefi'e rake away that which is
worthy of puniOiment ? For he is wont to call eternall life,grace:be-
caufc it is rcdred to the free gifts of God when it is repaied to workj.
But the Scripture doth further humble vs,and therwithall raifc vs vp.
For bcfide this that it forbiddeth vs to glory in workes, becaufe they
arethe free gifts of God,it therevviihall teachcth that they are alway
dehlcd v/ith lome drt- gges , that they can not fatisfie God, if they be
examined by the rule of his iudgement : but leafl our courage fliould
faintjic ccachcth y ihcy pkafc by only pard6.But although Auguftine
fpeakech
The grace ofChrift. Lib.3. 3 3^
(pcaketh fomwhat ocherwire than we <Jo:yet that he cloth not fo dil-
agrec in the matter, (liall appeare by his words in liis third bookc to Cap j
Boniface.Where when he had copared two men together j the one
of a life euen miraculoufly holy & perfe(ft,ihe other honell in dede
& of vncorrupt maners , but not fo perfe<^ but that much vvanteth
in himtat y lalt he condudeth thus. Euen this man which in maners
fcemeth much »nferiour,by reafon of the true faith in God whereof
he hueih and according to which he accufeih himfelfe in all his of-
fcnfcs, in all his good workes praifeth God,giuinge to himfelfe the
{hame,& to him the glory, & taking from himfelfe both the pardon
of (innes>& the loue of wcldoinges,when he is to be deliucred out of
diii hfe,hc pafletb into the fcllowfhip of Chnft. Wherefore,but be-
caufe of faithPWhich although it faue no man without workes(for it
is itjwhich worketh by loue/iot a reprobat faitb)yct by it alio finnes-
are releafed,becaufe the righteous man Iiueih of faith.-but without it y^^^ ^
euen the fame which fecme good works are turned into finnes.Hcre ^,
verily he doth plainly coafcfle y which we fo much trauailc to prouc,
that the righteoufnes of good workes hangeth hervponjthat ihcy are
by pardon allowed of God.
6 A very nearc fenfe to the places-aboue recitedjhauc thefcrMake ^"^-'^
to your felues friends of the Mammon of wickednes, that when you I'^Yixn.i
{hal faile,they may receiue you into euerlaftinge tabernacles. Com- 17,
maunde the rich men of this world nor to be proudly minded, nor to
truft in vncercaine richefle but in the huinge God^to do wcll,to be-
come riche in goo,d workes, to lay vp in ilore for thcmfelues a good
fundation againft the time to come , that they may obtaine eternall
life.For good works are compared to the richeffe, which we may en-
ioy in the bleflednefle of eternall life. I anfwerCjthat we Hiall neuer
jcome to the true vnderftading of them,vnlefle we turnc our eies to
the marke wherunto the holy Ghoft diredeth his words. If it be true
which Chrift faith , that our minde abideth there where our treafure
iSjas the childre of y world are wont to be earneftly bent to the get-
ting of thofe thmss which fcrue for the delites of this prcfent life : Co
the faithfull muft lookc,firh they hauc learned that thishfe fhal by-
andby vanifh away like a dreame,that they fend thofe thinges which
rhey would €nioy,thither where they (hal haue perfed life. We muft
ihcrforc do as they do whicli purpofe to remoue into any place^whcr
they haue chofen to reft their whole life.They fende their goods be-
fore,& do not mifcotentedly want the for a time:becaufe they think
themfelues fo much more happy, how much more goods they haqe
where they ihal tary long.lf we j^clcue that heauen is our countrey>it
VV iij
Cap.
.18. Ofthemanerhowtoreceiuc
bchouetb vs rather to fende away our nchefle thither than to kccpc :
the here where we muft Icofe them with fudden remouing.But how
>t.a 5. f^'ii wc fend them thither?lf" wc comunicatc to the necellities of the
>. poorcuo whom whacfoeucr is giuen,ihe lord accompteth it giucn to
°**^- himfelfc.Wherupon comtth that notable promifeHe that giueth to •
^ the poore, Icndeth for gaine to the LordcAeaine he that hberalljr
fovveth,{hall hberally reapc.For thofc thmgs are doLuered into the
hand of the !ord to kcpe, which are beftowed vpo our brethrc by the
duety of charity He,as he is a faithful kepcr ofy which is deliuered
to him,wil one day rcftore it with plentiful game. Are th^ our ductifuU
doings of fo great value w!th God, that they be as richcife laid vp in
ftore for vs in his handrWho Ihal feaie fo 10 fay,when the Scripture:
doth fo of. & plamly wimeffe ic?But if any man will leapc from the-
mere goodnes of God to the worthines of works,he lliilbe nothing
holpen by thefe teftimonies to the ftablilhing of his errour.For you-
can gather nothing rightly therof butthcraerfc inclmationof Gods*
tendernes toward vs:forafmuch as to encourage vs to well doing al-
though the feruices which we do to him are not worthy of fo much
as his only lookmg vpon the,yct he fuffi eth none of diem to be loft.
7 But they more enforce the words at- the Apoftle,which v/hen
he comforteth the Theflalonias in troubles, teacherh that the fame
The 1 are fent to themjV they may beaccopted worthy of the kingdom of
Godjfor which thev fufter. For(f3ith h<')it ts righteous v^ith God, to
render trouble to the y trouble you;buttQ you,re{t with vs when the
lord lefus fhalbe lliev/ed from heauen. But the aythorof the epiftle
cbr.6. to ^^^ Hebrues faith, God is not vnrig!!teous,y he fliould forget your
0. worke,& yloue which you haueiliewcdinhisnamefory youhauc
minjftred to the faintcs. To the fiift place I anfvvcre, that there is no
oin.8. worthines of merit fpoken of: butbecaufe God y farher willeth that
9. we whom he hath chofen to be his children, fhould be made hke to
uk- »4 Chrift his fir ft begotte ronnc;3s it behoued that he ftiould firft fufFcr,
^- & the enrrc into the glory appointed for him;fo muft we alfo by ma-
ny tribulations entre intothe kingdomc of heauen.Thcrfore when
we differ tribulatios for the name of Chrift, there are as it were ccr^
taine marks printed vpon vs,whcrwith God vfcth to marke the fliepc
'iU.6. of his flocke. After thismaner thcrfore we arc accomptcd worthy of
7« the kini^dom of God , becaufe wc beare in our bodv v markes of our
lord & m^ifter which are the liizncs of the children of God. To this
Cor 4 pufpofe make thefe feyinces. That we beare about in our body the
0, mortification of lefus Chrift y l.is life may be fliewed in vs. That wc
be fafliioncd like to his fuSringSj that we may come to the likcncs of
his
.a.4
2.
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 340
his refurredio from the dead. The reafon which is adioyned ferueih
not to prouc any \vorthines,but to confirme y hope of the kingdom
of Godtas if he had faid. As it agrceth with the iuft iudgemcc of God,
to take vengeance of your enemies for the vexations that they hauc
done to you: foagreeth it alfo to giue to youreleafc & reft from ve-
xations. The other place, which teacheth that it fo becommeth the
righteoufncflc of God not to forget the obediences of them that be
hiSjthat it dcclareth it to be in a maner vnrighteous if he (hould for-
get the,hath this meaning:God to quicken our flouthfulncs,hath gi-
uen vs aflurance that the labor (hall not be vaine which we fhal take
for his glory.Let vs alway rcmeber y this promife, as all other fhould
bring vs no profit , vnlefife the free couenaunt of mercy went before,
wherupon the whole affurednes of our faluation fhould reft. But lan-
ding vpon that couenant, we ought aflurcdiy to truft, there fh^ll alfo
not want reward of the liberality of God to our workes howefocuer
they be vnworthy.Thc Apoftle to confirme vs in that expedarion,af-
firmeth y God is not vnrighteous,but will ftande to his promife ones
made.Thercforc this righteournes is rather referred to the tructh of
Gods promife,tha to his iuft ice of rendring due. According to which
meaning there is a notable faying of Auguftin, which as the holy ma
fticketh not to rehearfe ofte as notable, fo I thinke it not vnwotthy
that wefhould continu.illy remeber ir.The lord (faith he) is faithful!, j^i nf,!
which hath made himfel'e detter to vs,not b/receiuing any thing of 3 1. am
V5,butbypromifing all things to vs. »o^.
8 There are alfo alleagcd thefe fayings of Paul.If I haue all faith,
fo that I remoue mountaines outof their place, but haue not charity, '■^^^'
I am nothing. Againe,Now there remaine hope,faith & charity, but (i^i^ .
the greateft among thefe is charity. Againe,Abouc allthine;cs haue 14,
chariry , which is the bonde of perfedion. By the fiift two places our
rharifesafiirme thatwe are ratheriuftificdby charity than by faith,
namely by the chiefer vertue as they fay.But this fonde argument is
cafily wiped away. For we haue in an other place aLcady declared,
that thofe things which are fpoke in the fiift place pertaine nothing
to true faith . The other place we alfo cxpounde of true faith , than
whichhe fayththat Charity is greater : not that itismorcmeriro-
riuSjbut becaufe it is more frutefuU-becaufe it extendeth further,be-
caufe it ferueth mo,becaufe it remaineth alway in force,whereas the
vfe of faith cotinueih but for a time. If we hauc regard toexcellecc,
the louc of God fhould worthily haue y chiefe place,of which Paule
here fpeakeih not.For he enforceih this thing only,y we (hould with
mucuall chanty ediSe one an other in y Lord,butlet vs imagine chae
V V ijij
Cap.iS. Of the.maner howtorccciuc
chanty doth eucry way cxccll faith : yet what man of founde iudge-
rnent,yca or of founde brame, will gather thereof that it doth more
iuftifiei'Thc power of iuftifying which faith hach,conlifteth not in the
wot thiiiefTv of the worke. Our iuftification ftandeth vpon the oncly
mercy of God 3c thcdeferuingofChriftjwhich iulhficatio whc faith
takech holdc ofjit is faid to iuftiiie.Now if you aske our aducrfarics in
what fcnfe they siTigne iuftit^cation to charity, they wil anfwere that
becaufc it is a djetifull doing acceptable to God,therefore by the de-
fci uing thereof rightsourneflc is imputed to vs by the acceptation of
the goodnes of God.Here you fee how wcl the argument proccdeth.
We fay that faith iuihfieth, not becaufe by the wortnincs of it fclfe ic
deferueth righteoufncs to vs ,but becaufc it is an inftrument by which
we freely obtain y tighteoufaes of Chnft.Thcfe mc,omitting y mercy
of God.and pafling ouer Chrift, (where the fumme of rightcoufneflc
ftandech)Jo aiTirme that we are iuftified by the benefit of charity be-;
ctaxCq it cxctllwth aboue faith : euen as if a man woulde reafbn that a
kirjg; is iUtcr to m«ke a fliooc tha is a niooemiker,becaufe he is an in-
fioKf way more excellent. This onely argument is a plaine example
that all tht Sobornicall Ichooles do nor (o much as taft with the vt-
leimolt part oftlieiriippes what the iuftification of faith is. But if any
wran^hrdoyetcarpe and aske , why mfo fmall diftance of pbcc we
take ihe name of faith in Paule fo dut<:ii\y : 1 haue a weighty caufe of
this cxpofition.For lith thofe gifts which Paylc rchearfeth are after a
ccrtame maner vndcr faith & hope,bccaufc they pertaine toy know-
Ict^ge of God, he c5temneth the all by way of recaptitulati5 vnder the
name of faith Sc hopc:as if he fiiould fay bothe prophecy, & togues,
& the grace and knowledge of interpretation tcnde to this rnarke to
lead vs totlie knowledgeof God,And we know God in this life none
Oiherwife but by hope &faith.Thcrforc when I name faith & hope,
I comprchciide all thcfe thinges together. And fo there remaine thcfe
three,Hope,Fastn,Chaniy:rhat is to fay, how great diuerfity of gifts
foe-uer there l>e,they are all refvjrred to thcfe. Among thefe the chief
is charicy,&c. Out of the thirde place they gather,! f Charity be the
bonde of perfcdion,then it is alfo the bonde of nghteoufncfle which
is nothingc elfe but perfedion. Firft,to fpeake nothinge howe Paule
there calieth perfedion, when the members of the Church well fee
in order do clcaue together, Sc to graunt that we are by charity made
* perfed before God : yet what newe thinge bringe they foorth ? For I
will alway on the contrary fide take exception and fay that we neuer
come to this perfedion vnlelfc we fulfil all the partes of charity,and
thereupon I wilgather,that fith all men are mpft far fro the fulhiling
of
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3 . 341
of charitie, theretore all hope of perfedion is cute of from them.
9 I will not go through all the tcftimonies which at this day the
foolifti Sorboniftesraflily fnatchoutofihe fcriptures ,as they fiift
come to hande, and do throwc them againft vs. For, fomc of them
arc lo worthy to be laughed at , that I my fclfe alio can not rehcarfc
them , vnleffe I would worthily be compted fond. Therefore I wdl
make an cndcwhcn 1 llial haue declared the fayin^^ of Chnft,vvhcre-
with (hey mariieloully pleafe thcmfelues. For, lo the lawyer which
af ked him what was neccliarie to faluacion, he anfwerednf thou wilt
entrc into hfe , kepe die commaundementes. What wold we more Mat 15
(fay they) when we are commaundcd by the author of g]:ace him- ^7.
Arlfe to g'lt the kingdom of God by the kcping of his commaunde -
mentes.f'As tliough forfooth it were not ccrtame, that Chrjfl tepered
his aunfweres to them with whom he faw that he had to do. Here a
dodorof the lawe afketh ofthemeane to obteinc blcfledncs, and
not that onely, but with doing ofwhat thing men may atteine vnco
it Both the perfon of him that fpake and the queftion it fclfe led the
Lord fo to anfwcr. The hwycr being filled with the perfuafion of the
righteoufncfle 6f the lawc,was blinde in cofidencc of workes. Agairie,
he foui^ht nothing els but what were the workes of righteoufncfle,
by which faluacion is gotten. Therefore he is worthily Sent to the
lawc , in which there is a perfcd mirror of righceoufncire. We alfo
do with a ioude voice pronounce that the commaundementes muil
be kcpt,if hfe be fought m works. And this dodrinc is neccffary to be
knowen of Chnftians. For how lliould they flee to Chrift if they did
not acknowledge that they are fallen from the way of hfe into the
hedlonge downefall of death ? But how (hould they vnderftand how
far they haue ftraycd from the way of life , vnleffe they firft vnder-
ftande what is that way of life? For then they are taught that the
(and:uarie to recouer faluation , is in Chrift, when they fee howe
great difference there is betwene their life and the righieoufhcfTe of
God which is contcined in the keping of the law.The fumme is this,
that if faluation be fought in workes,we muft kepe the commaunde-
mentes by which we are inftruded to pcrfed rightcoufnclTe. But we
mutt not fticke faft herc,vnlefle we will faint in our midde courfe:for
none of vs w able to kepe the commaundements. Sith therefore we
are excluded from the righteoufnes of the lawe,we muft of neceffity
refort to an other helpe,namely to the faith of Chrift. Wherefore as
here the Lorde calleth backe the dodor of the lawc whom he knew
to fwcll with vaine confidence of workes, to the lawc, whereby he
may iearne that he is aiinncr iTubied to the dreadful! iudgemem of
Cap. 1 8. Of the mancr how to receiuc
eternjU dcath:(o in other places, without making mction of the law,
he comfortcth other that are already humbled with fuch knowledge,
I . with promifc of grace , as, Come to mee all ye that laboure and arc
lodcn.and I will refrcih you,and yc fliall finde reft for your foules.
lo At the laft when they are weary with wrefting the Scripture,
they fall to futileties and fophifticall argumcntcs. They cauill vpon
this that faith is in fome places called a workc , and thereupon they
^. gather that wc do wrogfully fct faith as cotrary to workes. As though
forfoth faith in that it is an obeying of the will of God , doth with
her owne defer uinge procure vnto vs righteoufneiTe, and not raihet
bycaufc by embracing the mercie ofGod,itfealethin ourheartcs
tile righteoufneife of Chrift offred to vs of it in the preaching of the
Golpell. The readers {hall pardon me if I do not tarry vpon confu-
ting of fuch foliJcs,for they themfclues without any afl'ault of other,
are fufficiently oucrthrowen with their owne fcebleneOe. But 1 will
by the way cofute one obiedion which fcemeth to haue fome (hew
cf reafon, leaft it ihould trouble fome that ate not fo well pradifed.
Sith common reafon teacheth that of contraries is all one rule , and
all particular (innes are imputed to vs for vnrighrcoufneire , they fay
it IS meete that to all pariicalar ^ood workes be geuen the praife of
right eoufncs.Thcy do not fatisfie me which anfwerjthat the damna-
tion of men proprely proceedeth from only vnbelefcjnot from par-
ticular finnes.I do in deedc agree to them,that vnbelefe is the foun-
laine androoteof allcuels. Forit is the firft departinge from God,
after which dofoUowe the particular trefpafl'inges againll the bwe.
But whcras they feeme to fct one felfe fame reafon of good and euell
workes in weymg of righteoufneiTe or vnrighteoufncfle , therein I
am compelled to difagree from them For the righteoufnes of workes
is the perfede obedience of the lawe. Therefore thou canft not be
righteous by workes , vnlefle thoudofolloweitas altreight line in
the whole continuallcourfc of thy hfe . From it fo fone as thou hnft
fwarucd , thou arte fallen into vnrighteoufncfle. Hereby appeareth
that riohteoufneffc commeth not of one or a fewe workes, but of an
vnfwaruing and vnwcried obfcruing of (he will of God . But the rule
of iudgiug vnrighteoufncfle is moft contrary. For he that hath com-
mitted fornicationjot hath ftolen,is by one offence gilty of deathjbe-
caufe he hath offended agninll the maieftie of God. Therefore thefc
ourfuttlearguersdoftumble,forthai they maike not this faying of
, TameSjthathewhichfinncth inoncjis madcgilty of all, becaufehc
that hath forbidden to kill, hath alfo forbidden to fteale,&c. There-
fore it ought to feemc no abfurditic when we fay that death is the
iuAc
T'hc grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 342
iufte rcwarde of cuery finne , becaufe they are cucry one worthy of
thciuftc difpleafure and vengeance of God. But ihouihalt reafon
foolclheiy, if on the comrade fide thou gather that by one good
worke man may be reconciled to God , which with many linnes dc»
ferueth his wrathe.
The xix. Chapter.
of Chrijlian libertie.
NOwewcmuft entreate ofChriftian libertie : the declara-
tion whereof he muft not omitt whofe purpofc is to com-
prehend in an abridgmet the fumme of the dodrine of the
Gofpfll.For it is a thing principally neceffarie , and without
the knowledge whereof confcience dare in a manner enterprife no-
thing without doubtin^jthey ftumble and ftart backe in many things,
they alway ftagger & tremblctbut fpecially it is an appendant of lufti-
fication,andauailcthnota little to the vnderftjnding of the ftrcngth
thereof. Yea they that earnelHy feare God , fhaJl hereby rcceiue an
incomparable frute of that dodrine which the wicked & LucianicaJI Lucia.j
men do plealantly taunt with their fcoftes , becaufe in the fpirituall goiUcs
das kt ncife wherewith they be caken,euery wanton railing is lawefuli ™*°»
for them. Wherefore it fhallnowe come forth in ht feafon t andic
was profitable to diffcrre to this place the plainer difcorfing of it,(for
we hauc already in diucrs places lightly touched it) becaufe fo fonc
as any mention is brought in of Chriftian libertie, then either filthy
Itiftes do boile > or mad motions do arife,vnle(]"e thefe wanton wittes
be timely met witball , which do otherwife moft naughtily corruptc
the beft things. For, fbme men by pretenfe of this libertie , (hake of
all obedience of Godjand breake forth into an vnbridled licentiouf-
nefle : and fome men difdaine it , thinking that by it all moderation,
otdrc and choife of things is taken away. What iliould we here do,
being compared in fuch narrowe ftreightes?Shall we bidds Chriftian
libertie farewcll,and fo cutt of all fitt occafion for fuch perilesi? But,a$
we haue faid,vnleffe that be fall holden.neither Chrift, nor the truth
of the Gofpell , nor the inward peace of the foule is rightly knowen.
Rather we mutt endeuour that fo neceflarie a part of dodrine be not
fuppreflcd , and yet that in the meane time thofc fonde obieftions
may be metre withall which are wont to rife thereupon.
2 Chriftian libertie ( as I thinke) confifterh in three partes.Thc
firft, that the coafciences of the faithfull , when the affiance of their
iuftitication before God is to be fought,may raife & aduaunce them-
fclues abouc the lawe } and forget the whole rightcoufneiTe of the
Gap.ip. Ofthemanerhowtorccciuc
lawe . For Ikh the lawe (as we haue already in an other place decla-
red) leaucch no man righteousieither we arc excluded from all hope
of iuftification,or we mutt be loofed from the lawe,and fo that there
be no regardc at all hadde of workes. For whofo thinkcth that he
muft bring fomwhat be it ncucr fo little of good workes to obteine
righteoufnclTc , he can not apoincc any cnde or meafurc of them,
but maketh him fclfe dettcr to the whole lawe.Thcrfore taking away
zXi. mention of the lawe , and laying a(id<? all thinkmg vpon workes,
we muft embrace the onely mercie of God,when we entreatc of iu-
ftification:& turning away our fight from our felucs,wc nrnlt behold
Chrift alonc.For there the queftion is not howe v/c be rightcous:but
howe although we be vnrighteous and vnworthy,\vc be taken for
worthy. Of which thing if confciences willatieine any certainty,
they muft geue no place to the lawe. Neither can any man hereby
gather that the lawe is fuperfluous to the faithfull,whom it doth not
tlierefore ceafTe to teach,and cxhorte,and pricke forwarde to good-
ncflej although before the iudgement feate of God it hatH no place
in their conlciences. For thefe two things, as they are moft diuerfc,
Kb muft be well and diligently dilhnguifhed of vs. The whole hfe of
le.x. Chriftians ought to be a ccrtaine meditation of godlinefle , bycaufe
they arc called into fandification. Herein ftandeth the office of the
* lawe , that by putting them inminde of their duetie , st fhould ftir
them vptolhiTcndcuor offiolinclic andinnocencie. But when con-
fciences are carefullhowe they may haue God mercifull, what they
(ball anfwer,and vpon what affiance they {hall ftand if they be called
to his iudgcment , there is not to be reckened what the lawe requi-
reth , but onely Chrift muft be fei forth for rightcoufneife , which
pafteth all perfedion of the lawe.
5 Vpon this point hangcth almoft all the argumet of the Epiftlc
to the Galathians. For, that they be fondeexpoHters which teach
that Paule there contendeth onely for the hbertie of ceremonies,
may be proued by the places of the arguments. Of which fort arc
a. J. thefe. That Chrift was made a curfe for vs, that he might redcme vs
and from the curfe of the lawe. A gaine. Stand faft in the hbertie where-
with Chrift hath made you free , and be not againc entangled with
the yoke of bondage. Beholde, I Paule fay , if ye be circumcifed,
Chrift ftiall nothing profit you. And he which is circumcifed is dettor
of the whole lawe. Chrift is made idle to you whofoeuer ye be that
are iuftificd by the lawe:yc are fallen away from grace.Wherin truely
is c6t<^cdfomc hier thing than the hbertie of ceremonies.! graunt
in dcede that Paule there entrcateth of ceremonies,becaufe he con^.
t^ndcth
The grace of Chrift* Lib.3. 345
tcndcth with y failc Apoftles,which went about to bring againe into
the Chriftian Church the old fhadowcs of law which were aboiiHied
by the coming of Chnft.But for the difcuffingof thisqucftion,thcrc
were hier places to be difputedjin which the whole controueriic
ftoode. Firll becaufc by thofe Icv/ifli fhadowes the brightnelTc of
the Gofpcll was darkened , he fheweth that we haue in Chr^ft a fiiii
gcuing in dccdt of all thofc things which were ihadowed by the ce-
remonies of Mofes Secondly , becaufe thofe deceiuers filled tlie
people with amoftnoughty opinion, namely that this obedience
auailedtadeferue thetauor ofGod:Hcre he ftandctli much vpon
this point , that the faithfuU ihould not rhinke tliat they can by any
works of the ]aw,much Iclfe by thofe litle principles,obtciDC rightc-
oufnefle before God.And thcrewithall he teacheth, that they are by GaU^
the crofle ofChrift free from the damnation of the la wc, which 3«»
otherwife hangeth ouer all men, that they Ihould with full affured'-
nelfe reft in Chnft alone. Which place proprcly pcrtemeth to this
pnrpofe. Laft of all he mainteineth to the cofciences of the faithfuU
their hbertie , that they fhoulde not be bound with any religion ia
things not ncceffarie.
4 The fecond part, which hangeth vpon that former part, is thai
confcienccs obey the lawe,not as compelled by the nectflicie of the
lawe : but being free fi-om the yoke of the lawe it felfe,of their owne
accord they obey the will of God. For , becaufe they abide in per-
petuall terrors , lb long as they be vnder the dominion of the lawe,
they ilisll ncuer be with cherefuU redinelTc framed to the obedience
of Godjvnlefl'e they firft haue this hbertie geuen them.By an exam-
ple we fhall both more briefly ,and more plainely percciue whatthclc
things meane.Thc commaundement of the lawe is,that we louc our Den. 4
God with all our heart, with all our foule,with all our ftrcngths.That $•
this maybe done, our foule muftfirftebc madevoide ofallothcc
(enfe and thought , our heart muft be clcanfed of all defircs , all our
ftrengths muft be gathered vpand drawen together tothisoneljr
purpofc.They which haue gone moft far before other in the way of
the Lord,are yet very far from this marke.For though they louc God
with their minde ,and with fincere atfcdion of heart , yet they haue
ftill a great parr of their heart and foulc pollcifed with the defircs of
the flellie , by which they are drawen backc and ftayed from going
forward with hafty courfe to God. They do in deede trauaile forward
with great endeuor; butthcflefh partly feblcth their ftrengths, and
partly drawcth them toitfelfe. What ihnll they here do, when they
felc that they do nothing lefl'e than performc ihc lawe JThcywil^
Cap.19. Of the maner how to recciuc
they couet.they endcuor,but nothing with fuch peifc<f^ion as ought
to be. If they loke vpon the Iawc,tiiey (ce that whatfoeuer workc they
attempt or purpofc, is accurfed. Ndthcr is there am' caufe why any
man ihould decciue himfclf with gathering that the worke is there*
fore not altogether euell, bycaufe itis vnperfcd : and thcrefoTc that
God doth neuerthdefl'e accept that good which is in it.Foi;,the iawc
requiring perted loue,c6demnefh all imperfedion, vnlcfl'e the rigor
of it be mitigated. Therefore his workes fliould fall to nought which
he would hauc to feme partly good: and he ihall finde that it is a
tranfgreliion of the l3we,eu£n m this becaufe it is vnperfcd-
$ Loe,howe all our workes are fubiedto the cnrfe of thelawe»
if they bemeafuredby theruleof thelawe . Buthowc ihould then
vnhappy foules cherefuliy applic themfelues to workc/or which tjjcy
might not tiUlt that they couldegctany thinge butcurfc? Onihe
other (ide, if being dehuered from ihis (ieucre exa(fling of the lawe,
or rather from the whole rigor of thelawe, they heare that they be
called of God with fatherly gcmlenelfe : they will merily and with
great cherefulnefTe auniwer his calling and followe his guiding. In a
fumme , they which are bound to the yoke of the lawe , are like to
bond(eruants,to whom arc appointed by their Lordcs certain tafkcs
of worke for euery day. Thefe feruants thinke that they haue done
nothing , nor dare come into the fighi of their Lordcs, vnlefle they
haue performed that full taf ke of their workes. But children , which
are more liberally and more freemanlike handled of their fathers,
fticke not to prefent to them their begonne & half vnperfed workes,
yea and thofe hauing fome fault , triifting that they will accept their
obedience and willingnefTe of minde,although they haue not exa«3ly
done Co much as their good will was to do. So muft we be as may
haue fure affiance, that our obediences flialbe allowed of our moft
kinde father,howe htle foeuer,and howe rude and vnperfedfoeuer
they be. As alfo he aflurcth to vs by the prophet; I will fparcthefn
(faith he) as the father is wont to fpare his fonne chat ferueth him.
Wiieie this word Spare,ts fet for to beare withall,or gently to winkc
at fjult^s, forafmuch as he alfo maketh mention of feruice. And this
affiace is not a htle necelfirie for YS,without which we dial go about
all things in vaine. For God accompteth himfelfe to be worfhippcd
wnh no worke of ours but w is truly done of vs for the worfliipping
of him. But howe can that be done among thefe terrors, where it is
doutcd whether God be offended or worfhipped with our worke ?
6 And that is the caufe why the author of theEpiftleto the
Hcbrues , rcfcrreth all the good workes that arc red of m the holy
fathers.
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j. 344
fathcrs,to faitli,& weyeih them ondy by faith.Touching this liberty Ro.t«.z
there is a place in the Epiftle to the Romaines,where Paule refoncth ^o"'^-
that fooie ought not to hauc dominion ouer vs , becaufe we arc not
vnder y law,but vndcr grace. For when he had exhorted the faithfutt
that (inne (hoiild notreignc in their mortallbodie,and that they
(hould not geue their mebers to be weapons of wickednefle to linrie,
but {hould dedicate thcmfelues to God , as tKcy that are ahuefrora
the dcade , and their members , weapons of righteoufneffe to God:
and whereas they might on the other fide obicd that they do yet
carry with them the tiefl> fuIlpfiuUes, and that finne dwellethin
them, he adioyneth that comfort by the liberrie of the lawe, as if he
ihould fay. Though they do not yet throughly fele (inne deftroycd
and that righteoufneffe yet liucth not in thcm,yec there is no caufis
why they fliould feare and be difcouragcd as though they had bene
alway difpleafed with the for the remnats of {inne,forafmuch as they
are by grace made free from the law,that their workes fliould not be
examined by the rule of the law. As for th£ that gather that we may
hnnc becaufe we are not vnder the Iaw,lct the know that this Hberty
perteineth nothing to thcm/he ende wherof is to encourage to God.
6 The third part is,that we be bound with no confciencc before
God of outward things which are by them felues indifferent , but
that wc may indifferently fometime vfe them , and (bmctimc leauc
ihem vnufed. And the knowledge of this libertie alfo is very nccef-
lary for vs,for if it fhalbe abfent,there (halbe no quiet to our cofcien-
ccs>no ende of fuperftitions. Many at this day do thlnke vs fonde to
moue difputation about the free eating of fie(h,about the free vfe of
dayes , and garmcntes and fuch other fmale trifles as they in decde
ihinke them: but there is more weight in them than is commonly
thought. For when confcicnccs haue ones caft themfelucs into the
fnarcjthey entre into a long and comberfome way,from whence they
can afterward finde no cafy way to get out.If a man bcginne to doubt
whether he may occupy hnnen in llietes,(hertes, hankerchcifi"s,.-?nd
napkines, neither will he be out of doubt whether he may vfe hepe,
and at the laft he wil alfo fall in doubt of mattes,for he will way with
himfelf whether he cannotfuppe without napkins,whcther he may
not be without handkercheifes. If any man thinke deinty meatc to
be vnlawefull, at length he (hall not with quictneffe before the Lordc
eate cither brouncbreade or common meafes,when he icmembretn
that he may yctfufteine his body with bacer foode.If he doubtc of
pleafaunte wine,aftcrwarde he will nrtrtnnkc deadc wine wth good
peace of co^Tcience, laft of all he will not be fo bold to touch {w*.>icr
Cap.ip. Ofthemanerhovvtorcceiue
and cleanncr water than other. Finally at the length he will come to
this point,to thinke it vnlawefull (as rhc common faying i$)to treadc
vppon a ftiawc lying a crofTe. For here is begonne nolighte ftrifc,
but this is in qucftion, whether God will bauevstovfe thefeor
thofe thinges , whofe will ought to guide all our counfells and do-
inges . Hereby fome muft needes be carried with defpcration mto
a confufe deuouring putfomc muftjdefpifing God, and caftmi? away
his fcare,make themfelues away through dcftrudio when they haue
no redy way. For whofoeuer are entangled with fuch doubting,wh;ch
way focucr they turne themfelues , they fee eucry where prticnt of-
fcnfe of confcience.
8 I knowc (faith Paule) that nothing is common (meaning by
common,vnhoIy) but who fo thinketh any thmg common.tohim it
is common. In whichwordeshemakcch all outward things fubied
to our hbertic,prouided alway that our mindes haue the ailurance of
the libcrtie before God. But if any fupcrftitious opinion caft into vs
any dour, thofe things which of their owne nature were clean e, arc
defiled to vs. Wherefore he addeth : Bleflcd is he that iudgeth not
himfelfc in that which he allowcih. But he that iudgethjif he eate, is
condemned,becaufc he cateth not of faith. And that v/hich is not of
faith, is finnc. Among fuch narrowe ftreightes, v/ho fo neucrthelcfl'c
with carclefly venturing on all things Ihewe themfelues boulder , do
they not afmuch turne themfelues away from God? But they which
are throughly pearccd with feme feare of God,when they themfelues
alfo arc compelled to do many things againft their confcience , arc
difcouraged & do fall downe with feare. All that are fuchjdo rccciuc
none of the giftcs of God with thankefgeuing , by which alone yet
Paul teftifieth that they all arc fanftified to our vfe. I meane the than-
kefgeuing that procedeth from a heart that acknowledgcth the libc-
ralitie & goodnelTe of God in his gifres. For,many of them in deedc
do vnderftande that thofe are the bcnefites of God which they vfe,
and they praife God m his workes : but fith they arc not perfuaded
that they arc geuen to themfelues, ho we Ihould they thanke God as
rhcgcucr of them? Thus in a fummc we fee, whereto this libertie
rcndeth,namely that we fhould vfe the gifts of God to fuch vfc as he
hath gcuen them vnto vs,without any fcruple of confcience,without
any trouble of minde:by which confidence our (bules may both haue
peace with him and acknowledge his libcralitie toward vs. For here
arc comprehended all ceremonies that are at hberty to be obferucd,
that our confcicnccs fliould not be bound with any neceilitie to kepe
them , but ihould remember that the vfc of them is by Gods benefit
The grace of Chri ft. Lib.3, 345
fubic^to themfcluesvnto edification.
9 But ic is diligently to be noted, that Chriftianliberric is in al
the partes ofic a fpintuall thing, the whole ftrength whereof con-
Cftcth in appeaiingfenrfull confciences before God,if cither they be
vnquJeted or careful! for ihe forgcucneifc of h'nnes, or if they be
pcnfiue whether our imperfcd workes and deii led with the faultcs
of our flelli do pleafe God,or if they be troubled about the vfc of in-
d'.tFerent things. Wherefore they do wrongfully expound ir, which
cither do make it a cloke £ov their ,owne dffires, that they may abulc
the gifces of God to their owne Juif ,or v, hich do tb.inke that there is
no iiberric but that which is vied before mei), and therefore in vfing
it haue no regard of the vvcake brethren. In the fiiftkinde,men do ac
this day much oftend.There is .ilmoft no man which may by his abi-
Jitic of wealth be fumptuous , which delitcth not in excf ilii.'e gor-
gioufnefle,in furniture of banketj-jin apparell of body, in building of
hoiifes , which hath not a will to exccll Oiher in all kmde of ftateli'
neffeiwhich doth not maiuciloiiOy flatter h!rr;fclf in his fyiencfTe.And
all thefe things are defended vnder the pretefe of Chnftian libertie.
They fay that they are things indiftlrcnt:! graunt/o that a man in-
differently vfe I hem. But when they are to gredily coueted,when they
are proudcly bofled,wh€n they are waftt fully fpenr, it is certalne
that thofe things which othcrwifc were of thcmfclues lawfull, are by
thefe faultes defiled. This faying of Piiule doih very well put diffe- TJt.i
rcncebetwene thmgs indifFeretrAll things arc cieane tothc cleane; ">' ,
but to the defiled . nd vnbeleuine , nothing is cleane , becaufe their ^^'^'^•'^'
fninde and confciencc is defiled.For why are accurfed the rich men, ^^^ ^
they which haue their comfort,which arc fansfied with meare,which i.ia 5.2.
donowe lau^h, which flepe in beds of iuory .which ioynclandfo
•lande , whofe banketes haue lure , harp , taber and wine ? Verily
both luory, and goldc,and richclle, arc the good creatures of God,
permitted yea & apointed by the prcuidence of God for men ro vfe.
Neither is it any where forbidden either to laugh j or to be fatisfied
.with meatCjOr to loyne new y oiTe iTions to their ownc olde pofltflios
or of their aunccrters, or to be dehted with muficall melodic 5 or to
drink wine.This is true in dcede.Bui wi e they haue plenty of things,
to wallov/c in dehtes,ro glut themtclues,ro make their wit and mindc
<lronk:c^wjth prefent plcafures & alway to gape for nevve,thefe doing?
arcmoft farre from the lawfull vfe of the i»iftes of God. Therefore
let them take away immeafurable dcfire.lei them take away immea-
furable wafting,let chcm take away vanitie and arrogance, that they
may with a pure confcicnce purely vfc the gifces of God. When the
XX
Cap.i^. Of the maner howto receiiie
minde (halbe framed to this fobrietie , they (hall haue a rule of the
lavvfull vfc. Ori the otheriide ice this moderation be wanting, euen
bafe and common dchcatcs arc to much. For tiiis is truely faid, that
oftentimes in frifeand courfe cloth dwelleth a purple licarte,and
fomrime vnder filke and purple,heth (imple humilitie:Let euery man
in his decree fo liue either poorely , or meancly , or plentifully, that
they all remember that they are fed of God tohuejnot to be riotous:
and let them thinkc,that this is the lawe of Chrirtian hberty,if they
haue learned with Paulc to be contented with thofe things which
they prefcnrly haue : if they canfkill both to be humble and to
excell: if they be taught in all places and in all things to be both full
and hungry,to haus plcntie and ro fuffre want.
10 Herein alfo many men do errc , bycaufe as though their li-
bertie lliould not be founde and C^tQ vnlcfle it had men witneffes of
it, they do vndifcretly and vnwifely vfe it. By which vafeafonablt
ydciS^ they many times oftend the weakc brothien. You may fee at
this day Tonjeywhich thinke that their hbcrtic can not ftande, vnlelTc
ihcy take pofleffion of it by eating of ftcfli on fnday. I blame not
that they care : but this falle opmion muftbednuenout of their
tnindrs. For they ought to thinks that by their libcrtic they obteinc
no newe thm2 in the h'^ht of menne but before God , and that it
ftandeth as well m abfteming as in vling. If they vnderftande that
it maketh no matter before God , whether they eate flefti or eggcs,
whether they weare redde or blacke garments, that is enough. The
confcience is nawe free , to which the benetite of fuch hbertie was
due. Therefore although they do afterward abfteine all their life
long from flc{li,and weare alway but one colour,yet they are no IclTe
free. Yea therefore becaufe they arc free , they do with a free con-
fcience abfteine. But they do moft hurifully offend bycaufe they no-
thing regard the weakcnclTe of their brerhrcn^which we ought fo to
bcare with,that we raflily commit nothing with otfcnfe of them. But
fometime alfo it bchoueth that our hbertie be (et forth before men.
And this I graunt.ButthereisameafuremoftheedefuUy tabekept,
thatwccaftnor away the care of the weakeofwhome thcLordc
hath fo earneftly geucn vs charge.
1 1 1 will in this place therefore fpeake fotnewhat of ©ft'enfes, in
what differecc they are to be taken,which are to be auoidcd,& which
to be negle<fted:whereup6 we may afterward determine what place
there is for our hbertie among men. I like well that comon diuifion,
which tcacheth that th're i". of offcnfes one fort geucn, an other ta-
ken : for afmueh as it both haih a plaine tcftimonie of the Scripture,
and
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. ^^6
and doth not vnhtly exprcHe that which it meaneth. If thou do any
ching by Ynfeafonable hghtnclfe,or wantonncflcjor raihnefle, not in
order, nor in fit place , whereby the ignorant and weake are offcii-
dcd.that fame may be called an oflcnlc geue by ihec:becaure it came
to palFe by thy fault that (uch oHtnle was ihrred vp. And it is alway
called anoFfenfc geucn in any thing, the fault whereof came from
the doer of the ti)in'.> it felfe. It is called an offenfe taken,wlicn a thing
which is otheiwife no: eucllv done nor out of time is by euell will or
by (omc wrongfull malicioufncHe of mindc dr^wcn to occafio of of-
fenfe. For in this cafe was not oflenfe pe'uen, but thete vvronuefull
conftruers do without caufe take one.With that Hrrt kinde of offenfe
none are offended but the weake : but with this.ij.kindc fowre natu-
res & Pharifaicali fcornefull heads are offended.VVhcrtfore we (hail
'call the one,the oftenfe of the weake:the other of the Pharirees;and
we ihall To temper the vfe of our libertie , that it ought to geuc place
to the lenoranceof the weake brethren 3 but in no wife to therigo-
roufnelfe of the Pharifees. For, what is to be yelded to weaknefTe,
.Paule iheweth in very many places. Bearc ( fiith he) the weake in R<""«W
faith. Again,Letvs not hereafter iudge one an othcr:but this rather, '' '|J
let there not be laycd before our brother any offenfe or occaimn of
falling;and many other fiyings to the fame entent , which arc more
fit to be red in the place it lclfc,ihan to be here rchearfcd.The lumme
is, that we which are ftrong fhould beare with the wtakencfles of
our brethren,and not pleafe our fehjes,but euery one of vs picafe his
neighbor vnto good for edifying. In an other place, But fee that your ••Co»-8
libertie be not in any wife an ofienfe to them that arc weake. Againe, ^'
Eate ye al things that are foldinthefliambleSjafkingno quelhonfor 40.15.'
confciencc:of your confcience ( I fay) not an other mans. Finally be
ye fuch , that ye geuc no offenfe , neither 10 the lewes, nor to the
Grekes , nor to the Church of God. Alfo in an other place, Ycarc G-*'^* S*
called, brethren, into hbertie : onely geue not your libertie to be an * 5*
occafion to the fle!h,but by charitie ferue ye one an other. Thus it is.
Our libertie is not geuen toward our weake neighbours , whofe fer-
uantcs charitie maketh vs in all things:but rather, that hauing peace
with GodmourmindeSjWe may alfo liue peaceably among men. As
for the offenfe of the Pharifees , howe much it is to be regarded, we
learnc by the wordes of the Lorde , nhercby he biddcrh them to be
let alone, becaufe they are blinde, and guides of the bliiide. The W.it.ij;.
difciples had warned him,that the Pharifees were offended with his ^^'
fayings : he aunfwered that they vvcretobe ncglefted,and the of-
fending of them not to be cared for.
XX ij
Cap.i p . Of the iiianer how to receiiie
I a B'.iryet ftiU the matter hangeth doutfull, vnlesweknowc
who nre to be taken for weake , and who for Pbarifees : which differ
rence beinge taken away , 1 fee not amonge offences what vfe at all
of liberty remaineth,vvhich might neuer be vfed without great daua-
ger.But It feemeth to me that Paul hath moft pJainely declared both
by doiSrine and by exampleSjhowc far our liberty is either to be tern-
A&, 16. V^^^ or ^^ be defended though with offences . When he tokc Ti-
3. Hiothec into his conipany,he circumcifed him:but he coulde not be
Gal. 1.3. brought to cifcumcifeTitusHere were diuerfedoings,& no chaugc
* ^ of purpofe or of mindc : namely in circumcifing Timothee,when he
J ,^ was free from all men , he made himfelft- a feruaunt to all men ; and
he was made to the Iewes,as a lewe, that he might win the Icwes : to
them that were vnder the lawe,as if he himfelf were vnder the iawc,
that he might winne them which were vnder the lawe : all things to
all men , that he might faue many , as he writcth in an other place.
Thus we haue a right moderation of libertie.if it may be indifFeretly
rcftraiiied with fomc profit. What he had rcfpeft vnto,when he
Cil» 2.4 ftoutly refufed to circumcife Titus, he himfelf teftiiiethjwriting thus.
But neither was Titus, which was with me , although he was a Gre-
cian , compelled to be circumcifed , becaufe of the falfe brethren
V. hich were coine in by the way, which had priuily crept in to efpic
our libertie which we haue in Chnftiefus, that they might bring v$
into bondage.to whome we gaue not place by fubiedion fo much as
for a time , that the truth of the Gofptll might continue with you.
There is alfo a time when we muft of nccefl'itie defend our libertie,
if the fame be in weake cofciences endaungercd by the vniuft exac-
tines of falfe ApolHes.We muft in euciy thing ftudy to prcferue cha-
nty, & haue regard to the edifying of our neighbor. All things (faith
he) arc lawfuU for me,bur not all things are expedient : all things arc
I. ("or. lawcfiill for me , but not all thinges do edify. Let no man feeke that
5- ^ 3« w is his owne, but y which is an otherj.Thcre is nothing now plainer
by this rule, than that we muft vfe our libertie, if it may turne to the
ediiying of our neighbor; bucif itbenot fo expediet for our neigh-
bor , then we mi ft fbrbeare it. There be fomc which conterfait the
wifdorac of Paiile in forbearing of libertie , while they do nothing
les di.ui apply f he fame to the duties ofcharitie. For fo that they
may prouide for their owne quictnes,they wifh all mentio of hberty
to be buried.whercas it is no ies behoucfull for our neighbors,forae-
limc to vfe libei tie for their benefit and edification , than in fit place
to reft- aine it for their comnioditie. But it is the part of a godly man
to thmkc , that free power in outward things is therefore graunted
him.
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 347
him, that he may be the fieer to all duties of charitie.
15 But whatfoeucr I haue fpoken of auoyding of offences , my
meaning is that it be referred to meanc and indifferent things, For,
thofe things that are necelTary to be done • are nor to be leU vndonc
for fear of any offence. Forasourlibertieis tobe fubmittcdtocha-
rity/o charity it felfe likewife ought to be vnder the purenes of faith.
Venly here alfo ought to be had regard of charitie , but fo far as to
the altarSjthat isjthac for our neighbors fake we ofted not God Their
intemperance is not to be allow'cd,\vhich do nothmg but with tiou-
blcfome turmoiling , and which had rather ralhiy to rend all things,
than leifurely to rip them. Neither yet are they to be barkened co,
which when they be leaders of men into a thoufand forts of vngod-
lynes , yet do faine that they muft bchaue thcmfelucs fo that they be
none offence to their neighbors. As though they do not in y me.inc
edifv the c5rciences of their neighbors to euill,fpecially whci as they
fticke faft in the fame mire without any hope of getting out. And ti:e
pleafant men forfoth , whether their neighbor be to be inftruded
with dodnnc or example of life, fay that he muft be fed wiih milke,
whome they fill with mofteuill&poifonous opinions. Paule rcpor- i Cor,
teth that he kd the Corinthians with drinking of milke;but if Popifh ?. i.
Maffc had then bene among them, would he haue facrificed to gcue
them the drinke of milke. But milke is not poifon.7 herefore they lie
in faying y they feedethem whom vnder a ihev/e of flattering allure-
mentes they cruelly kill. But jgraunting that fuchdiffembling is for
a time to be allovvcd j Howe long yet will they feedc their childrtn
withmilke?For if they neuer grow bigger, that they mayalihcleaft
be able to beare fome light meate , it is certain that they were neuer
brought vp with milke. There are two reafons that moue me why I
do not nowe more Hiarply contend with thcm-.firftjbecaufe their foU
lies are fcarcely worthy to be cofutedjfith they worthily feeme filrhy
in the fight of all men that haue their found wit: fecondly ,becaufc
I haue fufficiemly done itinpecuhar bookesjl will not nowe do a
thing already done. Onely let the readers remember this, that with
whatfoeuer offences fatan and the world go about to turne vs away
from the ordinances of God,or to ftay vs from following that which
he apointeth , yet we muft neuertheleffc go earneftly forward : and
then, that whatfoeucr dangers hang vpon it,yet is it not at our hberty
to fwarue one heare bredth from the commaundemcnt of the fame
God, neither is it lawefull by any pretence to attempt any thing but
that which he geueth vs leaue.
14 Nowe therefore fith faithful! confcienccs hauin^ receiucd fuch
Cap.i^. Of the maner how to receiuc
pretogitiue of libertie as wc haue aboue fet forth, haue by the be-
nefitc of Chrill obtained this that ihey be not entangled with any
fnarcs of obferuarions in thofe things in which the Lorde willed that
they ihould be at hbertierwe conclude that they are exempt irom all
power of men. For it is vnmeete , that either Chrift (hould lofe the
tiianke of his fo great hberalitiejor confcienccs their profite.Ncithcr
oufjht wc to thinke it a flight matter^which wc fee to haue coft Chrift
fo decre : namely which he valued not with gold or lilucr , but with
i.Pcc.i. his owne bloud : fo that Paule fticketh not to fay , that his death is
Q^'j made voide,ifvrcyeldour foules into fubicdion to men. For he
and 4*.* ^'■^'"clleth about nothing els in certaine chapter? of the epiftle to
the GalathiaSjbut to (hew that Chrift is darkned or rather deftroied
to vsjvnlclfe our confcicnces ftand faft in their libertie, which verily
they haue loft if they may at the will of men be fnared with the
bondes of la wes and ordinances. But as it is athingmoft worthy ro
be knovven ,fo it necdcth a longer and plainer declaration. For fo
foone as any word is fpoken of the abrogating of the ordinances of
men jhiandby £;reat troubles are raifed vp partly by feditious men,
p.irrly by flaunderers , as though the whole obedience of men were
at once taken away and oucrrhrowcn.
15 Therefore that none of vs may ftumblent this ftone.firftlet
vs confidcrjthat there are two fortes of gouirrnment in man : the one
ipiritunil whereby the confciencc is framed to godlineife and to the
WO' fnip of God : y other ciuill, wherby man is trayned to the duties
ofhumanitic andciuilitie which are to be kept among men. They
are commonly by not vnht names called the Soirituall and Tempo-
ral! iur!fdidion,whereby is Hgnificd, that the fiiftof thefetwo formes
of s^ouernment pertaineth to the life of the foule , and the latter is
occupied m the things of this prefcnt life : not onely in feeding and
clothing, but in fetting forth of lawcs whereby a man may fpend his
life among menholily.honeftlyjand foberly For,thatfiift kinde hath
place in the inward mindc,this latter kinde ordereth onely the out-
ward bchauiours. The one we may call the Spintuall kingdome the
othi"r,the Ciuil kingdome. But thefe two, as we haue deuidcd them,
inuft be either of them alway feudally cofidered by thcmfelues: and
when the one isinconfidering , we muft withdrawe and turne away
our mindes from the thinking vpon the other. For there are in man
as it were two worlds, which both diuerfe kings & diuerfe lawes may
goucrne. By this puttins; of difference Ihail come to paffejthat that
which the Gofpell teachcth of the fpirituall libertie, wc fhall not
wrongcfully drawc to the ciuil order, as though Chnftuns were ac-
cording
Th€ grace of Chrift. Lib.;. 548
cording to the outvvjrd goucrnment leffe fubicd fo the bwcs of men,
becaul'e ihcir r onQieiiccs are ar Iibertic before God : as though they
were t!:ercroie exempt from all bondage of the fleih , bccauic thty
are free according to the fpirit. Again, btcaufe euen in thofc ordinan-
ces which fecme toperc^ine to the Spirituall king<iome,there may be
fome error ; we muft alfo put difference betwene thcfe , which are to
be taken for lawful! as agreablc to the word of God , & on the other
fide which ought not to liaue place among the godly . OftheCiuilc
goucrnment there fhalbc els where place to fpeake. Alfo of the Ec-
clefiafticall lawes I omit to fpeake at this time , becaufe a more full
enrrcating of itfhalbe Ht for the fourth book^where we iTiall fpeake
of the power of the Church. But of this difcourfejltt this be the con-
clufion,Thc queftion being (as I haue faid) of )t fclfe not very darke
or entangled > <ioih for this caufe accomber many, becaufe they do
not futteliy enough put diflPeiece betwene the outward court as they
cal it,a(id the court of confcience. Moreoucr this encreafeth the dif-
ficukie, that Paule tcacneth chat the Magiftrate ought to be obeyed, I^' w.i 5
notonely for fe.^rof puniHiment ,but for confcience. Whereupon ^ ^*
foiioweihthatconfci.nces arc alfo boundc by the ciuile lawes. Ifit
were fo,all fl^ould come to naught which we both haue fpoken and
(hc?ll fpeake of the fpintuail gouernment.Forthe lofingof this knot,
finl it is good 10 know what is confcience. And the definition therof
is to !)e fetched from the deriuation of the word. For, as when men
do with minde and vndcrfiandini; conccaue the knowledge of things,
they arc thereby faid (Scire) to knowc, whereupon alfo isderiued
the name of Science: Knowledge :fo when they haue a feeling of
the ludgementof God,as a witnes ioined with the , which doth noc
fufterthem to h'de their (innes but that they be drawen accufcd to
th? iud Jcment fcate of God, thnt fame feeling is called Confcience.
For it is a certaine meane betwene God and man,becaufc it fuftreth
no: man to fuppreficinhiaifelfthatv.hich he knoweth but purfueth
him fo far till it bring him to gdtines.This is it which Paul meaneth, P°o^»*»
where he faith that confcience doth tOi.'ethcr witncffe with men, '^*
when their thoughtes do accufe or a'^uite them in the iudgemeni o(
God. A Gmple knowledge might remaine as enclofed within man.
Therefore this feeling which prefcnieth man to the judgement of
Godjis as it were a keeper ioined ro man , to marke and efpie all his
fccreteSjthat nothing may rem^.ine buried in darknes. Whereupon
aifo con-jmcth thatolde Prou'.rb, Confcieceis a thoufmdwitneircs.
And for the fame reafon Peter hath fctthe examination of a good i.Pet»r,
(Pnfcierice for (iuictnefTc of minde , when being perfwaded of the >i,
XX iiij
Cap.ip, Ofthcmanerhowtoreceiuc
grace of Chrift , wc do without fear prelentour felues before God.
Icb.io. And che author of the Epiftle tothe Hcbrues , fetteth to haue no
more cofcience of finnc, in ftede of to be dehuered or acquited chat
finne may no more accufe vs.
16 Therefore as workes haue rcfped to men , To confcience is
referred to God, fo that a good confcience isnothmg els but the
.Ti.i.; inward purents of the hart. In which icnfc Paul writeth that charity
is the fulfilling of the lawe out of a pure confcience & faith not fai-
ned . Afterward alfo in y fame chapter he fheweth how much it dif-
fered! from vnderiiinding, faying that forr chad fuffrediliipwrackc
from the faith, becaufe they had torfaken ;.;ood Confcience. For in
thefe wordes he ngnifieih it is a liuely aftedion to worlhip God , and
a iinccre endeuor to hue holilv and godlily.Somenme in deede it ex-
kft 14. tendeth alio to men, as in Luke where the fame Paul protclteth that
*• he endcuored himitife to walke with a good confcience toward God
and men.But this was therefore faid, becaufe. the frutes of good con-
fcience do flowe and come euen to men But in fpeakir-g properly,
it h.nh refpecft to God onely , as I haue already faid. Hereby it com-
meih to pas that the lawe li faid to binde the confcience^which lim-^
ply bindech a man without refped of men , or without hauing any
confideration oF them. As for examplcGod commaundeth not onely
to kepe the minde chaft and pure from all loft , bur alio forbiddeth
all manner of fihhsncs of wordes andoutwardc wantonnes whac-
focuerit be. To th(i;kepinge of this lawe my confcience isfubied
although there liued not one man in the world. So he that behaueth
himfelfc intempcranily , not oncIy finneth in this that he geueth an
cuill example to the brethren , but alfo hath his confcience bound
with giltincs before God, In things that are of themfelues meane,
there is another con(ideration. For we ought to abfteinc from them
.Cor. if they bred any offence, but the confcience ftill being free. So Panic
*'**^' fpeaketh of flelhconfecrate to Idolcs. If any ( faith he) moue any
doubt, touch it not for confcience fake : I fay for confcicnce,not thine
but the others. A faithfull man (hould(inne,which being firfl warned
{hould neucrthclefle eate fuch flefh.But howefoeuer in refped of his
brother,it is necefl'ary for him to abfteine as it is prefcribed of God,
yet he ceaffeth not to kepe ftil the liberiie of cofcience.Thus we fee
howcihis lawe binding the outward wotke , leaueth the confcicnce
vnbound.
The
The grace of Chrift, Lib.3. 34^
The XX. Chapter.
of TrMiefy which is the chiefe extra fe offaith^and vvhtrthy vvt
daily receme the benefit es ofGed,
OF thefe thingcs that haue bin hitherto fpoken , we plaincly
pciceiue how needy and voide man is of all good things, &
howe he wanteth all helpcs of faluation . Wherefore if he
fecke for relicfes whereby he may fuccour his needmes, he
muft go out of himfelfe and get them elfe where . This is afterward
declared vnto vs that the Lorde doth of his owne free will and libe-
rally giue himfelfe to vs in his Chriftjin whom he ofFercth vs m ftedc
of our mifcry all felicity , in ftede of our neede wcIthineiTe, in whom
he openeth to vs the hcauenly treafurcs: that our vvhol- faith fhould
behold his beloucd fonnCjV vpon him our whole expedation {hould
hange, in him onr whole hope fhould (hckc faft and reft. This verily
is the fecret & hidden Philofophy, which can not be wronge out with
Logickill arguments;but they learne it whofe eies God hath opened
that they may fee light in his light . But (ince that we are taught by
f3ith to acknowledge that vvhatfoeuer we haue neede of,whatloeuer
wanteth in vs,the fame is in God & in our Lord lefus Chrift , name-
ly m whomc the Lorde willed the whole fulneffe of his largcfle to
reftj chat from thenfc we ihoulde all drawe as out of a moft plemifull
fbuntaineinowc it remaincth that we leekc in him, and with prayers
craue or him that which we haue learned to be in him.Oihcrwifc to
know God to be the Lord & giucr of all good thmges,which allurtth
vs to pray to him- and not to go to him and pray to him : fhoulde fo
nothing profit vs,thac it Hiould be al one as if a man (hould ncgled a
treafure Ihewed him buried and digged in the ground. Therfore the
Apoftl?, to fliewe that true faith can not be idle from callingc vpon
Godjhath fet this order:that as of the Gofpcl fpringeth faith,fo by it
our heartes are framed to cal vpon the name of God. And this is the
fame thing which he had a hde before fayd,that the Spirit of adop- -
lion,which fealeth in our heartes the wiincfle of the GofpelLraifeth ^^^
vp our fpirits that they dare Hie w forth their defires to God, ftirre vp
vnfpeakeable groninge^nd eric with confidence A bba,Fathcr. It i$
mete therfore that this laft point, becaufe it was before but only fpo-
ken of by the way & as it were lightly touched,fliould nowc be more
largely entreated of.
2 This therfore we get by the benefit of prayer,that wc attaine to
thofe richcfte which arc laid vp for vs with the heauenly father . For
there is a ccrtaine communicatingc of men with God,whcrcby they
Cap.2o. Of the mancr how to rccciue
entringinto fandhiary oflieauen,do in his owne pretence call to him
toucliing his promifcs: that the fame thing which they beleuedhim
affirming only in word not to be vaine,they may when necdc fb rc-
quircch Hndc in experience. Therefore we fee that there is nothing
let forth to vs to be looked for at the hand of the Lord, which wc arc
Dot aifo comaunded to craue with praicrs: fo true it is that by prayer
arc digged vp the treafures, which our faich hath looked v pon being
(hewed to it by the Gofpel of the Lord. Now how ncceffary and how
many waycs profitable this cxcrcife of praier is , it can by no wordes
be fufficiently declared . Vndoutedly itisnot withouccaufe thatthc
heaucnly father tcftifi£th,that the only fortrelTe of falnation is in the
callingc vpon his name, namely whereby we call to vs the prelencc
both of bis prouidence , by which he watcheth to take care of our
inatters:and of his powc^jby which he fuftaineth vs being weake and
in a maner faintinge:and of his goodnefTe , by which he rcceiueth vs
into fauour being mifcrably loden with finncs:finally wherby we call
him all whole,to giue himfelf prefcnt to vs.Hercby groweth finguiar
reft and quietnes to our confciences. For when we haue difcloil d to
the Loide the ncceffity which diftrefled vs, we largely reft though it
were but in this only that none of our cuils is hidden fro him,whom
vfc arc perfwadcd both to be moft well willinge toward vs, and moft
able to prouide well for vs.
J But (will fome man fay) did not he know without any to put in
minde of it,both in what parte we be diftrefled, and what is expedi-
ent for vs : fo that it may feemc after a certayne mancr fuperfluojs,
that he (liould be troubled with our praicrs , as though he winked or
flept , vniill he were awaked with our voice ? But they which Co rea-
fon,markc not to what end the Lord hath inftruded them that be his
to pray : for he ordained it not fo much for his owne caufc as rather
for ours. He willeth in deede, as right it is,that his due be rendred to
him,whcn they acknowledge to come from him whatfoeuer men re-
quire or do pcrceiue to make for their profit,and do teftjfie the fame
with wifhings.But the profit alfo of this facrifice wherwith he is wor-
fliippcd, commeth to vs. Therefore how much more boldly the holy
fathers slorioufly talked both to themfelues & other of the bcnefites
of Qod/o much the more fbarply they were pricked forward to pray.
The oneiy example of Ehas ftialbe enough for vs,which bcinge furc
ofthccoufellof God, after that he not raflily had promifed raine to
"g5 Achab,yet bufily praycth betwcne his knccs,and fendcih his fcrunnt
^*• feaucn rimes to efpy itrnot for that he did difcredit the oracle of God,
but becaufe he knew that it was his ducty,lcaft his faiih lliould waxe
drowfie
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3, 350
drowfie and fluggilli, to lay vp his defires with God. Wherefore al-
though while we lie fei.flcffc & fo dul that we pcrceiuc not our ownc
miferieSjhc wakcth and watcheih for vs,and foTntime olfc helpcth v$
vndefired,yct it much behoueth vs.thnt he be connually called vpon
of vs , that our heart may be enflamed with earncfl and fciuenc de-
fire to reeke,louc,and vvoriliip liim,'Ah.'ie we accuftome our felues in
euery neccfliicy to flee to him as to our iliooie nnchare. Againe,that
no dclirc and no wifne at all may cntrc into our mindc , whereof wc
fnould be aOiamcd to make him witneife, while we learnc to prefenc
our willieSjyea & to poure out our whole heart before his e) es.Tbc,
that we may be framed co receiue all his benefices with true th.inke-
fulnes of mindcyea & with outward thankefgiuing, of which we arc
put in mind by our praier that they come to vs from his hand-More-
ouer, that when wt haue obtained that which we dcfiredjbting pcr-
fwadrd that he hath anfwcred to our prayerSjWe may be thereby the
more feruently caricd ro thinke vpon his kindenes , and therewithall
embrace with greater pleafure tliofe thins^es which we acknowledge
to haue bin obtained by praier.Laft of all,th:u very vfe & experience
may accordingto the meafure of our weakenefle allure our mindes
of his piouidencej when we vnderftand that he not only promifeth
that he will neuer faile vs,and that he doth of his owne accord open
vs the entry to cal to him in the very poin: of nccc{Iity,but alfo hath
his hand alway ftretched out to help the that be his, & that he doth
rot fecde them v/ith wordes,but dc fcndeth them with prefent help.
For thefe caufes , the muft kinde Father , although he neuer flcpcth
or IS fluggilli , yet oftentimes maketh a ihewe as though he flept and
were (luegilh, that fo he may exercife vs,which are otherwife flouih-
full and fluggiflie to come to him , to aske of him, to requii c him to
our owne great benefit. Therefore they do to foohfhlyjwhich to call
away the mindes of nien from prayer, babble that the prouidence of
Godjwhich maketh for the fafekcpmg of all thinges.is in vamc wea-
ried with our callings vpon himrWhereas the Lord contrariwife not Pfa»i
invaincteftifieththatheisnie ro all them that call vpon his name in *'•
tructh. And of none other fort is y which other do triflingly fay,that
it is fuperfluous to aske thofe thines which the Lorde is of his owne
will ready to giue : whereas cuen the very fame thinges which flowc
to vs from his ownc free hberality , he will haue vs acknowledge to
be granntcd to our praicrs. Which thing that notable fcntence of the
Pfalme doth teftifie , wherewith many like fayinges do accordc. The
eyes of the Lordc arc vpon the righteous , and his cares vnto their pft. j
praiets. Which fayinge fo fettcth out the prouidence of God bent of i ^.
Cap.2o. Of the maner how to receiue
his ownc accord to prouide for the fafety of the godly,that yet he o-
mitteth not the excrcife of faith, whereby fioiithfuInefTe is wiped fro
the mindes of mcn.The eics of God therefore do wake, that he may
fuccour the necelfity of the bhnde:but he will againe on our behalfs
heare our gronings,that he may the better proue his loue toward vs.
I »» And fo both are troe,that the watchman of Ifraell flepeth not,nor
flombreth , and yet that he (itteth ftill as hauinge forgotten vs when
he feeih vs dull and dumme.
4 Now ,to frame praier rightly & weUetthis be the firft rule, that
we be no otherwife framed in minde and hearte , than becommetli
them that enter into talke with God . Which verily we ihall attains
as touching the minde , of the fame being free from flefhly cares and
ihoughtes wherewith it may be called away or withdrawcn from the
right and pure beholding of Godjdo not onely beftde it felfe wholly
to prayer, but alfo fomuch as is pofi'ible be lifted vpSc caricd aboue
it felfe.Neirher do I here require a minde lb at libetty,y it be pricked
and nipped with no care , whereas contrariwife the feruentnefle of
prayer muft byjnuch carefulneffe be kindiedin vs(as we fee that the
holy feruantes of God do fometime declare great toimentes, much
more carefulnefles , when they fay that they vtcer to the Lord a be-
wailingc voice out of the deepc depth,and out of the middeft of the
iawcs of death ) But I fay that all Grange and foraine cares muft be
driuen awny,whercwith the minde it felfe wandring hither and thi-
ther is caricd about,& being drawen out of heauen is preflfed down
to the earth . I mcane by this that it moft be lifted vp aboue it felfe,
that it may not bring into the fight of God any of thofe things which
our bhnde & foohlli reafon is wont to imagine,nor may hold it felfe
bound within the compaffe of her owne vanity,but rife vp to purenes
worthy for God.
5 Both thefe thinges are fpecially worthy to be notcd,that who-
foeuer prepareth himfelfe to pray, fliould thereto apply all his fenfe J
and endeuour$,& not(asmen are wont)be diueifly drawe with wan-
dering thoughtes:becaufe there is nothing more contrary to the re-
ucrence of God,than fuch lightncflc which is a witnefTc of too wan-
ton licentioufnelFc and loofe from all fcare. In which thing we muft
fo much more carneftly Iabour,as we finde it more hard,for no man
can be fo bent to pray , but that he fhall feele many bythoughtes to
crepe vpon him, cither to breakc of,orby fome bowing & fwaruingc
to hinder the courfe of his prayer .But here let vs call to minde, how
great an worthinefife it is, when God receiueth vs vnto famihar talkc
with him, to abufc: his (o great gentelnefle , with minglinge holy and.
profane
The grace of Chrift, Lib.3. 35!
prophanethin^es togethcr,when the reuerence of him holdcth noc
our mindes faft boud vnto him: but as if we talked with fomc meanc
man,we do in the middt-tt of our prayerjforfaking him, leapc hither
aiidthuheuLetvsiheriore know that none do rightly and wellprc*
pare themfelues to praier,but they whom the maicfty of God pear»
cethjthat they come to it vncumbred of earthly cares and affedtos.
And that is ment by the ceremony of lifting vp of handes, that men
fhoulde remember that they be farrediftant from God, vnlefTe they
hftvptheirfenfesonhie.Asalfoitisfaid in the Pfalm.Totheehauc pfai,j
I lifted vp my foule. And the Scripture oftentimes vfeth this manner i.
of fpeech, to lift vp praier:thac they which defire to be hard of God,
fliould not fit ftil m their drcgges. Let this be rhe fumme:that howc
much more liberally God dealeth with vs, gently alluringe vs to vn-
lode our cares into his bofome , fo much lefle excufable are we vn-
Jeffe his fo excellent and inconr>parable benefit do with vs oucrwcyc
all other things and draw vs vnio it felfe,that we may earncftly apply
our endeuours and fenfes to pray :which can not be done vnlefle our
minde by ftrongly wraftlinge with the hinderances do rife vp abouc
them. An other point we haue fee foorth, that we aske no more tlian
God giucth Icaue.For though he biddeth vs to pourc out our hartes,
yet he doth indifferently giue loofc reines to fooUfh and froward af-
fedionsrand when he pVomifeth that he will do according to the will
of the Godly,he procedeth not to fo tender bearing with them that p^ ^
he (ubmittethhimfeife to their will. Butin both thefe poinces men j>.
do comonly much offend.For not only the moft part of men prefumc
without {hame,without reuerece,to fpeake to God for their follies,
& fliamltfly to prefent to his throne whatfocuer liked them in their
dreame:but alfo fo great folifhnes or fenfelclfe dulnespofrefTeth the,
that they dare thruft into the hearing of God, cuen all their moft fil-
thy defiresjwherof they would greatly be afhamed to make men pri-
uy.Somc piophane men haue laughed to fcorne, yea & deieftcd tkis
boldnes, yet the vice it felfe hath a] way reigned. And hereby it came
to pafTe that ambitious men haue chofen lupiter to be their Patrone:
couetous men, Mcrcurie: the defitous of learninge, Apollo and Mi-
neiua:warriers,M3rs:and Lecherous folkc,Venus.Likc as at this day
(as I haue eucn now touched)men do in praiers graunt more licence
to their vnlawfull defircs,than when they fpottingly talke with their
Egalles.But God fuffreth uot his gentlencs to be fo mockcd:but clai-
ming to himfelfe hjs ri^ht,makcth our praiers fubicd to his authori-
ty,and rcftrairurth them with a bridle . Therefore we muft kcepc faft , i^jt,
this faym^e of Ighn, This is oui affiance, that if wc askc any thingc i^.
Cap.2 o. Of the maner how to recciuc
according to hi$ W)l,lie hearcth vs.Butforafmuch as our abilities arc
far fi o being fufficicnt to pcrfomic Co ereac perfedio, we mutt feke a
remedy to help vs. As we ought to bend the light ot our mind to God
fo the affcdion of the heartc ought alfo to followe to the fameenae.
But both do ftay fan e beneth it, yea rather do faint and faile or be
caned a contrary way . Therefore God to fuccour this weakcmfle,
in our prayers giucth the Spiritetobe our Schoolemailler , toJn-
ftiud vs what is right , and to goucrne our aftlcftjons . For, becaufc
n^'. wc kiiowenoc what we ought toprayeas weou^htjtheSpintecom-
mech to our fuccour.and maketh interccfrion for Vi wuh vnfpcakea-
blc groninges, not that it in deede either praycth or groneth but flir-
reth vp in vs affiance jdefires , and fighinges , which the ftrength of
nature were not able to conceiue . And not without caufc Paulc
callcth them vnfpcakeable groninges which fothe faythfull fcndc
foorthby the guidmgc of the Spirite, becaufe they which aretiucly
cxcrcifcdin prayers, arc not ignorant that they be fo h olden m per-
plexity v>rith blinde cares , that they fcarcely finde what is profitable
forihcm tofpeake : yea while they goabcmto vtter ftammeringc
wordes they flicke faft encombred . Whereupon it followeth , that
the gift of prayinge rightlyisa (ingulargift . Thefc thinges are not
fpokcnto thispurpofe, tbatvvefauoringeour owncflouthfulnelTc
fhould giue ouer the charge of prayinge to the Spirit of GodjSnd he
dull in thatcarclefntffejto which we are roo much enclined: (as there
are hcarde the wicked fayingcs of fome, that we muft lie negligently
gaping to waite vntill he preuent our mind^s occupied elfe where)
but rather that wc lothing oor ovvnc ilouthfulncfle and fluggirhnefle,
ror. fiiould crauc fuch helpe of the Spiritc. Neither doth Paule,when he
• i6. biddeth vs to pray in Spirite,therefore ceafle to exhorts vs to wakc-
fulnefleimeaning that the inftind of the Spirite fo vfcth hi? force to
frame our prayers , that it nothingc hindereth or flacketh our ownc
endf uour.becaufe God wU m this behalfc prouc how efTeduaUy faith
moueth our heartes.
6 Lctte alfo an othet law be , that in prayinge we alway feele our
owne wuit , & that earncftly thinking how we ftand in nede of thofe
thin?;cs that wc aske , we ioyne with our prayer an earncft yea fer-
ut-nr affcdion to obtaine. For, many doflighdyfor mancrs fake re-
cite prayers after ?. prefcribed forme, as though they rendered a cer-
taine taske to God : and although they confelTc that this is a neceffa-
ry remedy for their euils,becaufc it is to their deftruftion to be with-
out th.e help of God which they crauc:yctit appcareth that they do
tins ducty for cultomctbrafinuch as in the meanc time their mindcs
are
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j. 552
are cold, & do not wey what they aske. The ^enerall & confufe fee
hng in deede of their necellicy leadcth them hereunto : but it doth
not ftirre them as it were in a prcfenccafc to askc reliefeof their
neede. Now what thmkc we to be more hatefull or more dcteftablc
to God than this fainingjwhcn a man askcth forgiueneflfe of finncs,
in the meanc time cither thinkingcthatheisnotafinner, or not
thinkmge vppon this that he is a (inner : eucn wherewith God him-
felFe is plainely mocked ? But of fuch pcruerfenefle (as I hauc fayd)
niankinde is full , that for manners fake they many times aske many
thin^cs of God , which they certainely ludgc that without his iibc-
ralitie to come to them from fome other where , or that they hauc
them already remaininge wich them . The fauli of fome other fee-
meih to be hghter and yet not tolerable, that they which haue on«
ly conceiued this principle that we muft facrificc to God with praiers,
do mumble vp praiers without any mufing of mindc vpon them. But
the Godly muft principally take hcede , that they nener come into
the fight of God to as ke any thinge, but bccaufe they do both boylc
with earneft affedion of heart, and do thercwithall defire to obtainc
it of him. Yea and alio though in thofc thin^es which we aske oncly
to the glory of God, we fceme not at thefirft fight toprouide for our
ownc neccflicy,yet the fame ought to be asked with no lelfc feruent-
ncflfe and vehementnes of defire. As,whcn we pray that his name be
hallowed , wc muft (as I may fo fpeake)ferucnily hunger & thnft few:
that hallowing,
7 If any man obie<fl,that wc are not alway driuen with like ncccG-
fity to pray,I graunt the fame in dederand this d;flcrcnce is profitably
taught vs of lames : Is any man heauy amonge you ? Let him pray. lac.^
Who fo is mery,lei him fin2;.Thcrfore euen commo feeling teachcth xj.
vSjthat becaufe we arc to flouthfull,therfore,as the matter requireth
we are the more fharply pricked forwarde of God to pray carneftly»
And this Dauid calleth the fir time,bccaufe (as he teacheth in many .^-
other places)how much more hardly troublesjdifcomodities.fcares, ^ *
and other kmdes of terrtations do prefle vs,fo much freer acceiTe is o-
pen for vs, as though God did call vs vnio him. But yet no IclFc true Ephc.tf,
is that faying of Paule,th3t we muft pray at all times : becaufe howc- i8«
IbeucT thmges profpcroufly flowe accordmge lo our heartes defire,
and matter of mirth doth compafTe vs on cucry fide , yet there is no
minute of time wherein our neede doth not exhort vs to pray. If a
man haue abundance of wine and vvheate : yet fith he cannot enioy
one moifell of bread but by the continuall grace of God, whole cel-
lars or barnes full ihalbe no let why he Ihould not crauc daily bread.
Cap.2o. Of the maner howtoreceiuc
Nowcifwecall to mindehowe many dangers doeucry moment
hang ouervSjthe very fcarc it felfe Wil teach vs that we haue no time
free from prayer.But this we may better perceiue in fpiritualihings.
For , when iliall fo many finnes , wherof we knowe our felues giity,
fuffer vs to lit ftiU without care and not in humble wife crane pardon
both of t'le fault and the paine/VVhen do tentations graunt vs truce,
fo that we ncede not to haft vnto helpc ? More ouer the delirc of the
kingdame and gloryof Godoughtfotoplucke vs toit felfe , not by
fittesbu£continually»thatitlliouldc alway be fit time for vs. There-
fore not without caufe we are fooftcommaunded topray ccnrinual-
ly.I do not yet fpeake of perfeuerance in prayer, whereof mention
ihalbe made heraftenbut when y Scripture warneth vs that we ought
to pray continuallyjit accufeth our flouthfulnefle, becaufe we do not
perceiue how nccejOTary this care & diligence is for vs. By this rule all
hypocrifie & craftinefTe of lying to Godjisdebarredjyea driucn farrc
away from prayer . God promifeth that he will be ncere to all them
' that call vpon him in trueth , & he pronounceth that they (hall finde
him which feekc him with d-'eir whole heart. But they afpirc not thi-
ther which pleafc themfelues in their owne hlthinclTe. There-
fore a right praier requirech repentancc.Whereupon this is commo-
\y faid in the Scripturcs,that God heareth not wicked doers,and that
their praicrs areaccurfed , like as their facrifices alio be; becaufe it is
rightful that they finde the cares of God Ihur, which do locke vp theit
ownc heaits:and that they fhould not finde God eafie to bow, which
do with their ownc hardnefie prouokehis flitfenefle. InEfayhc
Ca.1 5. threatneth after this maner. When ye fliall multiply your prayers , I
will not hearc you :for your handes are full of blond. Againe in lerc-
;rc.ii. j^y . I haue cried, and they haue refufed to hearc : they fhall hkewifc
"'cricandl willnothcare*becaufehe taketh it foraniofthiedifhonor,
that wicked men fhouldc boaft of his couenant,which do in all their
fa. 3^. jjf^ defile his holy name. Wherfore in L fay he complaineth,that when
the lewes come nearc to him with their lippes , their hearte is farre
from him He fpeakcth not this of only praiers, but affirmeth that he
abhoireth fnmingc in allthe partes of wotfiiippinge him. To which
purpofe makcth that faying of lames. Ye aske,& rcceiue not:becaufe
ye aske illjthar ye may Ipcnde it vpon your plcalures.lt is true m dcdc
(as we Hial againe flievv a htle hereafter)that the prayers of the god-
ly which they pour outjdonoi: reft vpon their owne worthinelTcryct
loh *^ "°^ ^^^ admonition of lohn fupcrHuous ; If we aske any ching,wc
j^ ' fhp.ll rcceiue it of him, becaufe we kepe his commaundemcntes.-for-
afmuch as an cuiU confcience flmiieth the gate againft vs.Wberc-
upon
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3, 353
upon foUoweih that none do rightly pray , nor are heardc , but the
pure worlliippcrs of God.Thcrefore whofoeuer prepar.eth himfelfc v
to pray, kt him be lothfull to himfelfc in his owne euils, and(whjch
can not be done without repentance) let him put on the perfon and
minde ofa begger.
8 Hereunto k t the third rule be ioyned , that whofoeuer prefen-
teth himfclfe before God to pray, fliould forfake all thinkinge of his
owne glory jput of all opini5of worthmeSj&Hnally giueoueraltruft
of himfelrcgiuing in the abacing of himfelfc y glory wholly to God:
Jcfift if we take any thing be it ncuer fo litle to our felues.we do with
our owne fwelling fill away from his face. Of this fubmifllon which
ihrowcth downe ail hcighiluwe haue often examples in the feruantcs
of God:am5>4 whom the hoher thai eucry one isjo much the more
he is throwen downe when he commeth into the fight of the Lord.
So Daniel, whom the Lord himfclfe commended with fo great a tule pj,„^ -
of praife,fayd: We poure not out pur praiers before thee in our righ- 1 8,
teoufneireSjbut in thy great mercies. Here vs Lord, Lord be merciful!
to vsiHeare vs,& do theie thinges that we askcjfor thine owne fake;
becaufe thy name is called vpon oucr y people 8i ouer thy holy place
Neither doth he by a crooked figurc(as me fomtime fpeakc)minglc
himfelfc with the multitude as one of the pe oplcjbut rather feucral-
ly confcflTeth his owne gilt inc fie & humbly fleethto thefanduary of
forgiuenes,as he exprefly faych;When I confefTed my linnes and the
linnes of my people And this humblenesDauid alfo fetteth out with
his owne example,when he fayth;Enter not into iudgement with rhy
feruat, becaufe in thy figlit euery one that liueth {hall not be luthtied.' p^j,
In fuch manner Efay prayeth : Loc, thou art angry becaufe we baue 2.
finnedjthe world is founded m thy wayes, therefore we fhalbe faued: Hfa.74.
And we haue bin all filled with vncleannes,& all our righceoufncfTes ^ •
as a defiled cloth; and we haue all withered away as a Ieafej& our ini-
quities do fcattcr vs abroad as the winde : and there is none that cal-
leth vpon thy name , that raifeth vp himfelfc to take holde of thee;
becaufe thou haft hid thy face from vs, & haft made vs to pine away
in the hande ofour wickcdnes.Now therefore O Lord, thou art our
fathcr,we arc clay , thou art our f3fhioner,& we are the worke of thy
hande.Be not angry O Lord, neither remember wickednes for euer.
Bcholdjlooke vpon vs, we arc al thy people. Loe,how they ftand vpon
no affiance at all, but vpon this only,that thinking vpon this that they
be Gods , they deipeirc not that he will haue care of them. Likewile .
Icremy : If our iniquities anfwcre againft vs, do thou for thy names ler. 14
fakc.For it is both moft tiucly & moft holy wx iticn,of whcmfocuer 7-
YY
Cap.2o. Of the maner howro rcceiuc
it be, which being wrytcen by art vnknowcn author is fathered vpon
the Prophet Baruch; A foule heaUy & defolate for the greatnes of c-
uil,crooked,and weake, a hungry (oule, & fainting eics giue glory to
thee O Lord. Not accordinge to the ri^htcoufncfles of our fathers
do we poiirc out praiers in thy fight, and aske mercy before thy face
O Lord our God:buf becaufe thou art merciful! j haue mercy vpoii
vSjbccaufe we haue finned before thee.
9 Finally the beginning and alfo the preparing of praying right-
ly ,is crauing of pardon, with an humble & plaine confeilion of fault.
For neither is it to be hopcdl,that cucn the holieft man may obtainc
any thmg of God,vntill he be freely reconciled to him ; neither is it
poflTible that God may be fauourablc to any but them whom he par-
doncth. Wherefore it is no marucl if the faithfull do with this keie o-
pcn to thefelues the dore to pray.Which we learnc out of many pla-
ces of the Pfalmcs.For Dauid when he asketh an other thing,(ayth:
fal. 2 5 Remember not the finnes of my youth , remember me according to
.& 1 8. [{^y mercy for thy goodnefles fake O Lord. Againe,Looke vpon my
affli(5lion,and my labour, & forgiue all my finnes. Where wc alfo fe.e
y It is not cnough,if we euery feueral day do cal our felues to accept
for our newe finnes , if we do not alfo remember thofc finnes which
fa. 5 1 . might feeme to haue bin long ago forgotten. For, the fame Prophet
in an other place,hauinge cofefled one hainous ofFenfc by this occa-
fion returncth euen to his mother wombe wherein he had gathered
t!ic infedionrnot to make the fault feeme lefle by the corruption of
naturcbut that heapingc together the finnes of his whole life, howe
much more rigorous he is in condemninge himfelfe, fo much more
cafie he may hnd God to entreate.But although y holy ones do not
al^ay in exprefie words aske forgiuenes of finnes, yet if we diligent-
ly weye their prayers which the Scripture rehearfeth, wc fhall cafily
finde that which I fay jthat they gathered a mind to pray of the only
mercy of God, and fo alway tooke their beginning at appeafing him
becaufe if euery manne examine his owne confciencc , fo farre is he
from being bold to open his cares familiarly with Godjthat he trem-
blcth at euery comming toward him , except that he ftandcth vpon
truft of mercy and pardon.There is alfo an other fpeciall confefllon,
where they ask releafe of peineSjV they alfo pray to haue their finnes
forgiuen : becaufe it were an abfurdiiy to will that the efFcd be taken
away while the caufe abideth.For we muft beware that God be fauo-
• rablc vnto vs , before that he teftifie his fauour with outwardc figncs:
becaufe both he himfelfe will kepe this order, & it Hiould litle profit
vs to haue him beneficiill, vnleffe our confcicnce fcling him appca*
fed
The grace of Ch rut. Lib.3. 354
Jed fhoulde throughly make him louely vnto vs. Which wc are alio
taught by the anfwcre of Chrift . For when he had decred to healc j^fatt
the man ficke of the Palfeyjhe fayd,Thy (innes are forgiuen theedif- ».
tino vp our mindes thereby to that which is chiefly to be u'ifhed,thac
God firft receiue vs into fauoor, and then fhew forth the frute of re-
concihation in helping vs.But be(ide that fpecial confeilio of prefcnc
giltines,whereby the faithful make fupplication to obtaine pardon of
cuery ipecial fault & peine, that general preface, which procurerh fa-
uour to praieiSjis neuer to be omittedjbccaufc vnleifc they be gjrou-
ded vpon the free mercy of God, they fhall neuer obtaine any thing
ofGoiiVVheruntomay be referred thatfaymgof Iohn:lfwe cofeilc jj©^
our finficSjhe is faithful & righteous to forgiue vs^ & clcnfc vs from ^.
all iniquity. For which caufc it bchoued praiers in the time of the law
to be hallowed with expiation of blood, j they might be acceptabU,
& that fo the people fhould be put in min.de that they arc vnworthy
of fp great a prerogatiuc of honor,til] being cleanfed from their dea-
lings they ihould of the only mercy of God coceiue affiance to pray.
10 But whereas the holy ones fceme fomtime for the cntreatingc
of God to alieagc the help of'their ownc righteoufnes (as when Da- pr,] j
uidfaith:kepemy (bule,becaufc 1 am good.Againe Ezcchias;Remc- i Rcj
ber Lord I befech thee, that I haue walked before thee in trueth, and ^®'**
haue done good in thine cies)by fuch formes of fpeakins; they mean
nothing elfe than by their very rcgeneratio to tcUifie thefeiues to be
the feruants & children of God, to whome he hinrfelfe pronounceth
that he will be mcfcifuil.He tcacheth by the prophet(as we haue al- pf^j ,
ready feene)that his eies arc vpo the righteous, & his eare« vnto their 1 6.
praiers. Againc by the Apoftle, that we ihaU obtaine whatfoeuerwc ••^o'*
aske,ifwc kccpe his comaundements.In which fayings. he doth not
value praicr by the worthmefle of workes:but his will is fo to l^ablilli
their affiance , whofeownecofifcicncc well aflufcth thcmof an vn-
fained vprightnes & innocency, fuch as all the faithfull ought to be.
For the fame is taken out of the very trueth of God, which the bhnd
man y had his fight reftored, faith in lohn,y God hcarcth not finijicrs: lohn.
if we vnderftand finners after the comon vfe of the Scripture,for fuch **•
as without all defire of righteoufnes do altogether flepe & reft vpon
their finnes: forafmuch as no heart can euer breake forth into vnfai-
ned calling vpon God which doth not alfo afpirc to godhnes. Ther-
forc with fucn promifes accord the praiers of the holy ones,trhcrcin
they make mentio of their ownc purenes or innocency that they may
feele'^ to be giuen them which is to be looked for of al y feruants of
God.Againcitisthecomonly found y they vfe this kindc«f prayer,
YY ij
Cap.2o. ut tnemanernowto receiue
whe they do in the prcfencc of the lord compare themtelueSjW theJr
cnerriics,fi 5 whofc vniuft dealing they vvifhed ihetnfelues to be ^qIv*
ucrcd by his hand. In this comparifon it is no maruel if they brought
forth their righteoufnes & fimplicity of heart to inoue him v rather
by y righcfulnes of ihcir caufe to help the.This therforc we take not
aw>iy fr5 thegodly heartof a good mSjbut y he may vfe the purencs
of his confcicnce before the lordjto ftrengthe himfelf in y promifes
whervvith the Lord cofortcth & vpholdeth his true worfluppers:buc
our meaning is,that the truft of obtaining ftand vpon the only mercy
of God,laying away all thinking of their owne deleruing.
1 1 1 he fourth rule is, that being fo throwen downe and fubdued
with true humility,we fliould ncuertheles with certainc hope of ob-
taining be encouraged to pray. Thcfe be things in deede contrary in
iheWjto ioync with the feeiing of the iuft vengeance of God fure af-
fiance of fauour:which things do yet very well agree togciher,if the
onely goodnefle of God raife vs v p beinge opprelTed with our oivnc
cuills. For,as wehaue bffore taught that repentance & faith arc knit
as companions together with an vnfeparablc bond: of which yet the
oneafiaieth vs,the other chereth vs:fo in prayers they muft mutual*
ly meete together . And this agreement Dauid exprefTcth in fewc
1 , 8 wordcs ; I (faych he)wiU in the multitude of thy goodncffe enter in-
to thy houfc:! will worfliip in the temple of thy holinefle with feare,
Vndcr the poodncfl'e of God he comprehcndeth faith, in the meanc
time not excluding feare : becaufe not only his maiefty driueth vs to
reoerence , but alio our owne vnworthinelk holdcth vs in feare for-
getting all pride & alfurednes.But 1 meant not fuch an affiance which
fliould ftroke the minde loofed from all feeling of carefblnes with a
fweete & full quietenefTe.Forjto reft fo peafably is the doing of them
which hauinge all thinges flowing as they would wifli it, arc touched
with no care,3re kindled with no de(ire,do fwel with no feare. And it
is a very good fpurre to the holy ones to call vpon God, when being
diirreiicc v.-rth their owne neceflity , they are vexed with moft great
vnquietene(re,& are almoft difmaied in thcmfclues,tjll faith come in
fit time to their fuccours, becaufe in fuch diftreflcs the goodnefle of
God fo fliineth to them,y they do in dede grone beinge weried with
weii;ht of prefent euils,they are alfo in painc & grieued with feare of
greatcr,yet being fo vpholden by it, they both relieue and cofort the
hardnes of bearing them,& do hope for efcape & deiiuerance.Ther-
fore the prayer of a godly man mufl arife out of both affcdions,muft
alfocomaineSc Hicw both:namcly togronc for prefenc cuilsj& to be
carefully «fr aid ofnew,& yet thcrwiihall toflie to God, not douting
that
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 355
thar he is ready co reach his helpingc hande.For God is manfeloufl/
prouokcd ro wrath by our diftruftfulncs,if we aske of him the bcnehts
wiiichwehopenoc toobtaine.Thcrefore there is nothinge more a-
grcable with the nature of praiers, than that this law be prefcribcd &
apointed to ihcm,that they breake not foorth radily >but folovve faith
going before the.To this principle Chrift calleth vs all w this faying:
I fay vnto you, whatfocuer things ye requirCibcleuc y ye (hal receiue ATat.ii
them,& they ihall happen to you.Thc fame alfo he cofirmeth in an ^4^
other place.Whatfoeuer ye aske in prayer beleuir^, ye fliall receiue. ^ "^'^
22.
Wherwithagreeth lames fayingc, If any needc wifdomjethim aske lam.j
it of him which giucth to all me freely, & vpbraideth not:but let him 15 .
aske in faiih no douting. Wherin fetting douiing as contrary to faith,
he doth moft fittely exprefle the nature of it. And no lefTe is that
to be noted which he addeth , that they obtaine nothinge which cal
vpon God in wauering & dour, and do not determine in their hearts
whether they flial be heard or no. Whom he alfo coparcth to waues
which are diueifly tofi'ed and driucn about of the windc . Whereu-
pon in an other place he calleth a right praier , the praiet of faith. A-
gaine whe God fo oft affirmcth that he will giue to euery one acor-
ding to his faithjhe fignifieth that we cbtaine nothing without faith.
Finally it is faith thatobtaineth whatfbeu':r is grauntedby prayer.
This is meant by that notable fayinge of Paulc , which the foohfhc
menne do take no hecde vnto . Howe fliall any man call vpon him, Rom.i
in whomc heh;ith notbeleucd? But whoe fliall beleue, vnlefle '4-
be haue heard ? But faith commeth of hcaringe,and hcaringe of the
word of God.For,coueying by degrees the beginning of praier from
faith,he plainely affirmeth that God can not be (inccrely called vpo
of any other , than them to whom by the preachingc of the Gofpell
his mercifulnes and gentlencfle hath bin made knowen, & familiarly
declared.
la This neceffiiy our aduerfaries do not thinke vpon. Therefore
when we bid the faithfull to holdcwith afTured confidence of mindc
that God is fauourable & bcareth good will to them,thcy thinke that
wc fpcake a moft great abfurdity . But if they haddc any vfc of true
praier,they would truely vndcrftand that God can not be rightly cal-
led vpon without that ftedfaft feehng of Gods good will.Sith no ma
can vvcl perceiue the force of faithjbut he which by experience felcth
it in his heart : what may a man profitte by difputingc with fuch men
which do openly fiicw,that they neuer hadany thing but a vaine ima-
ginati6?For of what forcc,& how ncceffary is y alTurednes which we
require, is chiefely learned by inuocation.Which who fo fceih nor,
YY iij
Cap.2o, Ofthcmancrhowtorcceiuc
he bcwraieth y he hath a very dul cofcience.Let vs therforc.Ieaning
this kindc of blindemen,fticke faft in that faying of Paulcjthat God
can not be called vpon of any other , but them that know his mercy
by the Gofpell, & are furely perfwadedy it is ready for ihe.For what
mancr of faying (hould this bcrO Lord,I am verily in dout whether
thou wilt hearc me;but becaufc I am diftrefled \#ith carefulnes,! flee
to thccjthat thou maift help me if I be worthy.This was not the wo«
ted mancr of all the holy oneSjwhofe praiers we reade in the Scrip-
^•'•4' tures.Neiiherhatliy holy Ghoft thus taught vs by the Apoftle which
, biddcth vs to go to the heauenly throne with cofidencCjthat wc may
obtaine grace & when in an other place he teacheth f we haue bold-
nes & aecefle in confidence by the faith of Chrift.We muft therforc
holdc faft with both handes this aflurednes to obtaine what we askc
(fith both the Lord witli his owne voice io comaundeth vs^Sc all the
holy ones teach it by their exaple)if we will pray with frute.For5t:haC
only praier is plcafinge to God which fpringeth out of fuch a prefup-
tio of faith (as I may fo call it)&is groilded vpon a dredJes certainty
of faith, He might haue bin content with the bare name offaith,buc
he not only added c6fidence,but alfo furnifhed the fame with hberty
or boldnes, by this marke to put differece betwenc vs & vnbclcuers,
which do in deede alfo prayc to God as we do, but at aducnture. For
al 3 1 which reafon y whole Church praicth in y Pfalme; Let thy mercy be
vpon vs,as we put our truft in thce.The fame codition is alfo fpoken
al.<» tf of in an other place by the Prophet : In what d ay I Ihall crie , this I
.. know that God is with me. Againe, in the mornmge I will direA my
aJ- $• felfc to thec,& I wil watch.For of thefe words we gather,that praiers
are in vainc ca.'l into y aire,vnlefl*e hope be adioined,from whcnfe as
out of a watchtour we may quietly waitc for the Lord. Wherewith a-
•l»e,6. grceth the order of Paules exhortation. For before that he moue the
faithfoll to pray in fpirit at all times with wakeful nes & diligence, he
firftofal biddcth them to take the (hield offaiib,the helmet of falua-
tion,& the fweid of the fpirit,which is the word of God Now let the
readers here cal to remebrance that which I haue before faidjy faith
is not ouerthrowen where it is ioyned with acknowledgingc of our
miferyjnedines.&Hlthine*-. For with howheauy weight foeucr of e-
tiil doings the faithfull feel • themftlues to be ouerloden or grieued,
&ythcy benotonly void of allthinges which may procure fauour
with Godjbut alfo that they be burdened with many oftenfes which
may worthily make him dreadful to them:yet they ccafle not to pre-
fent thcmfclucs,ncither doth this feeling make tl^.c fo afraid but that
they ftil refort to him^ forafmuch as there is no other way to come
CO
The grace of Chrift. . Lib.3. 35^
tohim.For,praycr was notordainedjwhcreby wc Iliould arrogantly
aduace our lelucs before God, or eftcme at great value any thing of
our ownCjbut whcrby confeffing our giltincs,we fhould bcwaile our
roiferies to him,as childre do familiarly open their coplaints to their
parents. But rather the vnmeafurable heape of our euils ought to be
full of (purres or prickes to pricke vs forward to pray. As alfo the pro- . ^
phet tcachcth vs by his example , fayingc. Heale my fouIe,becaufe I , »
liaue (inncd againft thcc.I graunt in dccde that in fuch fayings fliould '
be deadly prickings vnlefTc God did help: but the moft good father j,
of his incomparable tender kindes hath brought remedy in fit fea-
fon, whereby appcafing all trouble,affuaginge all cares, wiping away
fearejjhe might gently allure vs to him,yea & taking away all doutes
(much more all ftoppes)he might make vs an eafie way.
I J And firft when he commaundeth vs to pray,he doth by the ve-
ry fame commaundement accufc vs of wicked obftinacy , vnlcffe we
obey him. Nothing could be more precifely commaunded,than that
which is in the pfalme : call vpon me in the day of trouble. But foraf- Pfa. 50.
much as among all thedueticsofgodIines,the fcriprure comcndcth ^ >•
none more often,! ncde not to tary longer vp6 this point. Aske(faith Mat.7.7
our maifter) & ye (hal recciuc:knocke,it {halbe opened to you.How-
beit here is alfo with the commaundement ioyncd a promifc as it is
ncceflary.For though all men c5fefle that the comaundement ought
to be obeied,yet the moft part would flee from God whc he calleth,
vnlefTe he piomifed y he would be eafie to be cntreated.yea & would
offer himfelfe.Thcfe two things being ftabiidiedjit is certain ywho*
foeucr make delaies that they come not ftreight to God,are not only
rebelUous and difobediefttjbutalfo are proued gilty ofinfidcli(y,be-
caufe they diftruft the promifes . Which is fo much more to be no-
ted, becaufe hypocrites vnder the colour of humility & modefty do
as wel proudly dcfpife the commaundement of God,as difcredit his
gentle caUinge , yea and defraud him of the chiefe part of his wor-
(hip. For after that he hath refufed facrihceSjin which at that time al
holines fcemed to ftand, he dcclareth that this is the chiefe thing and
moft precious to him,aboue all other, to be called vpon in the day of
jiede. Therefore where he rcquircth his owne, & cncourageth vs to
chercfulnes of obeyinge, there are none fo gay colours of douting f
may cxcufe vs. Whcrfore how many teftimonie? are comonly found
in y fcfiptures wherby we are comaunded to cal vpon God,fo many
ftandardes are fette vp before our eyes to put affiance into vs.It were
ra(hnes to rufhe into the fight of God, vnlefle he did preuet vs with
falling vs.Thcrforc he opcncth vs y way with his owne voice faying?
yy iiij
Cap,
.20. Of the maner howtoreceiuc
ch.13 Iwiltriy to thcm,Ye are my people:and ciuy iha\ fay to me,thou art
ouu God. Wc fee how he preuenieth them th.u wor{hip hiiTJ,& wil-
leth them to follow him, and therfore k is not to be feared that this
fliould not be a very fweie melody which he tumth. Specially let this
not.ible title of God come in our minde,whcrupon if we ftay,we (hall
^'^^' eafily paffe ouer all ftoppes. Thou God that hearcft prayer , euen to
thcc Ihall allHelli come For what is more loucly or more aliuringe,
than that God be garnifhed with this tale which may afcertame vs
that nothmg is more proper ro hisnature,th3n to graunt the dcfirc of
humble futcrs?Hereby the Prophet gathereth that the gate ftandeih
open not only to a fewe, hut to all men:becaufe he fptaketh euen to
i». 50. all in this fayinge: Call vpon me m the day of trouble ; I will dtliucr
thee , and thou fiialt glorilie me. According to this rule Dauid laicih
for himfelfe that a promife was giucn himjthat he may obtaine what
Sa.7. he asketh : Thou Lorde halt reuealed into the eare of thy feruaunt:
'• therefore thy feruaunt hath found his heart to pray. Whereupon we
gather that he was feareful!, (auinginfbmuch as the promife had en-
couraged him. So in an other place he armeth himfelfe with this ge-
a,i45 O'-'ral 'dodrine.He will do the will of them that feare him. Yea & this
}. we may note in y Pfilmes y ns it were breaking his courfe of praying
he pafllth ojer fomtime to the power of God,fomtimc to his good-
nciTe,fonuime to the trueth of his promifes.lt might feeme that Da-
uid by vnfeafonable thruftingeinof ihcfefentcnces,madem3ngt.'led
pr.iicrs.-b'jt: the faithfull know by vfe 2nd experience, that feroentncs
fainteth vnlclfe they put new nourirnmenres ^ nto ir, and rherfore in
pravinse the meditation both of the nature of God, and of his word
IS not iuperfluous. And fo by the example of Dauid^let it not grieue vs
to rhruli in fuch things as may refrefh fainting hearts with new liue-
ly it rcngtli.
J 4 And it is wondcrfull that with fo pircatf/zeeteneflre of promifes
we are either but coldly or almolt not at all moued, that a great p<utc
ofmcn wandringc about by compalfes had rather leauinge the foun-
taine of liuing waters, to dif^ge for thcmfcliics driepirts, than to em-
brace the liberality of God freely offred the. An inuincible tour is the
•0,18. name of the Iord,(faithSalomon)to it the righteous man fhal flee,&
'• he fhjlbe fauf^d. And Ioel,aftcr that he had prophecied of that honi-
ble deftrudi5 which was at hand,ndded this notable fcntcnce.Who-
foeuer callcth vpon the name of y lord,fhalbef<fe:which fcntecc wc
know to pcrtainc properly to tlie courfe of y Gofpell. Scarcely euery
hundreth ma is moued to go forward to mete God.He himfelf cricth
fa. 6$ by Efay ;Ye llial cal vpo me,& I wil hcare you,yea before that ye cric,
^ I
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3, .357 ,
I will aunfwer you. And this fame honor alfo in an other place he
vouchefaueth to geue in common to the whole Church , as it bc-
longethto all themembres of Chrift. He hath cried to me, 1 will Pfa. ^i
hearc him, I am in trouble with him,thai I may deliuer him. Neither ' ^*
yet (as I haue already faid) is it my purpofe tb recken vp all the pla-
ces,but to choofe out the chiefe , by which we may take a talt howc
kindely God allui eth vs vnto himjand with howe ftreight bonds our
vnthankfulncs is bound,when among folliarp prickings our fluggifli-
nclfe ftil maketh delay . Wherefore let thefe fayings alway found in "
our cares : The Lorde is nie to all them that call vpon him,that call ^'** ' *'
vpon him in truetii : alfo thefc fayings which we haue alleged out of
Efaye and loel , by which God affirmeth that he is hcdefull to heare
prayers ,yeaandisdclitcdas with a facrificeof fwetefauoure, when
we caft our cares vpon him. This flngular frute wcreceiuc of the
promifes of God, when we make our prayers not doubtingly & ferc-
fullycbut trulling vpon his word,whole maielly wold otherwife make
vs afraide , we dare call vpon him by tiie name of Father, forafmuch
as he vouchefaueth to pvt this molt fwete name into our mouthcs.
It rcmaincth thatwehauin^ (uch alluremenrcsfiiouldknowethat
we haue t'rrereby matter enough to obtcine our prayeis : forafmuch
as our prayers ftand vpon no merite of our own, but all their worthi-
nes and hope of obteining are grounded vpon the promifes of God,
and hang vpon them : fothatit nedetii noneothervnderproppjng,
nor loketh vpwardc hirher or thither. Therfore we mult determine
in our mindsjthat although we excell not in like holmes as is praifed
in the holy fathers,prophets & Apoftles,y^t becaufe the comaunde-
menc of prayer is common to vs, and faith is alfo common,if we reft
vpon ihe word of God, in this right we are fellowes with them.For,
God(as\vc hdue before lliewcd)promi(ing that he will be gentle,
and mercifull to ail, gcueth caufe of hope to all euen the moft mife-
rable that they (hall obreine what they af ke. And therefore the ge-
nerall foimcs are to bejnoted,from which no man (as they fay) from
the firft to the laft is excluded ; onely let there be prefent a purenes
of heart,mifl(kingofourfelfes, humility, and faith: let not our hy^
pocrify vnhohly abufe the name of God with deceitful! calling vpon
it : the moft good father will not put back them, whom he not onely
cxhorteth to come to him , but alfo moueth them by all the meanes
thathecanHeruponcometh the maner of praying of Dauid which i,Sii.f,
I haue euen nowcreherfed.Lo thou haft promi(cd,Lorde,to thy fer- *7«
uam : for this caufe thy feruant at this day gathcreth courage , and
hath found what prayer he might make before thee, Now therfore
Gap*2o. Or the maner how to recciuc
O Lorde God, thou art God , and thy words flulbe true. Thou haft
fpoken to thy feruani of thefe benefits:begin therfore, and do them.
"•"^ As alfo in an other place , Performc to thy fcruant according to thy
word. And all the Ifraehtes together, fooft as they arme themfelues
with remembrance of the couenant , do fufficiently declare that we
fhould not pray fearfully, wheras the Lorde fo apointeth. And herein
to. 32 they followed the examples of the fathers/pecialiy of Jacob, which
*» after that he had cofelTed that he was vn worthy of fo many mercies
which he had rcce.iued at the hand of God, yet he faith that he is
cncoraged to require greater things becaufe God had promifed that
he would do the. But whatfoeuer colours the vnbclcuers do pretend,
when they flee not to God fo oft as neceflitie prefleth the,when they
fckc rM)t him nor craue his helpc , they do as much defraud him of
his due honor as if they made to themfelfei newe Gods , and idoles:
for by this meane they deny that he is to the f he author of all good
thingcs. On the other fide there is nothing ftronger todehuci"thc
godly from all dout,than to be aimed with this thought,that no flop
ought to ftay them while they obey the commaundement of God,
which pronounceth that nothing is more pleafing to him than obe-
dience. Here againe that which I faid before more clcrely appercth,
that a drcdlcs fpirit to pray agreeth well with fear,rcu'erece,and care-
fulnes: and that it is no abfiirdity to fay that God raifeth vp the oucr-
thro wen. After this manner thofe formes offpcach agree well toge-
ther which in feming are contrary. lercmie and Daniel f^y that they
Te.4i throw e downe prayers before God. In an other place leremie faith.
Let our prayer fall down ip the fight of God, that he may haue mercy
am.5. ^^ j.|^^ remnant of his people. On the oi'her fide , the faithfull are
•t. 4». oftentimes faid to lift vp prayer. So fpcakechEzechias , requiring the
prophet to make interceffion for him. Arid Dauid defireth that his
Ki.ao. prayer may afcende as incenfe. For although they being perfwaded
y of the fatherly loue of God, chercfully committ themfelues into his
*' ^ faithfoJl kcping, and doutnot to craue the helpe which he freely
promifeth : yet doth not an idle carcIefnefTe hft them vp , as though
they ha4 caft away fliame , but they afcend fo vpward by degrees of
promifes,that they QiU remair.e humble fuppliants in the abacement
of themfelues.
1 5 Here arc queftions obicded more than one.For the fcripturc
rcporteth that the Lorde granted certainedefires which yet brake
forth of a mindc not quiet nor well'framed Verily for a iuftc caufe;
i,5i20 loatham had auowcd the inhabitants of Sichem, to the dcilrudion
which afterward came vpon the: but yet God kindled with fciuctnes
of
ThcgracfeofChrift. Lib.3, 358
of anger and vengeance following his execration feemeth to allowe
ill tcmpcied violent paflions. Such heat alfo caned Samlon when he lud.^
fiiid^Strengthen me O God,that I may take vengeance of the vncir- ^ ^*
cumcifedrFor though there were fomc peece of good zele mingled
with it : yet a hotc , and therefore faulty grcdines of vengeance did
bearc rule therin.God granted ic. Whereupon it feemeth that it may
be gathered, that although the prayers be not framed according to
the prcfcribed rule of the word,yetthcy obteine their efle»Sl anfwer
firft that a generall law is not taken away by fingular examplcs;again»
that fomtime fpeciall motions haue bene put into a fewe men,wher-
by it came to pafTe that there was an other c5(ideration of the than
of the comon people.For the aunfwer of Chiift is to be noted, when l^uc ^.
the difciples did vndifcretly dchre to couterfait the example of Elias, 55*
that they knewc not with what fpiric they were endued. But we muft
go yet further , and fay that the prayers do not alway pleafe God
which he granteth : but that , fo much as ferueth for example that i$
by clere praife made plaine which the fcripture teachcth,namly that
he fuccoureth the miferable , hcarcch the gronings of them which
being vniuflly troubled do craue his htipe : that therefore he execu-
teth his ludgemetSjwhen the complAints of the poore rife vp to him,
although they be vnworthy to obteine any thing be it neuer lo htle.
For howe oft hath he taking vengeance or the cruelties, robberies,
violence , filthy lulf es and other wicked doings of the vngodly, fub-
duing their boldnes and rage,and alfo ouerthrowing their tyrannous
po\ver,te(hHed that he helpeth the vnworthily opprelfed, which yet
did beat the aire with praying to an vnccrtaine godhcd ? Andonc
Pfalmc plainely teachech that the prayers want not ctfeft, which yet rra.107
do not pearce into heauen by faith. For he gathereth together thofe
prayers which neceltitie wringeth rk) lefle out of the vnbeleuers tha
out of tne godly by the very fehng of nature : to which yet he pro-
ucth by the effed that God is fauourable. Is it becaufe he doth with
fuch gentlcnes teflifie that that they be pleafing to him ? No. but to
enlarge or to fct out his mercic by this circumftance,for that cuen to
vnbeleuers their prayers arc not denied : and then the more to pricke
forward his true worfhipers to pray 1 when they fee that profane
wailingcs fometimc want not their cffed. Yet there is no caufc why
the faithfiill fhould fwarue from the lawe laid vpon them by Godjor
fliould enure the vnbeleuers • as though they had gotten fomc great
gainc , when they haue obtcincd their defire. After this manner we i.King.
haue faicj.that the Lordc was bowed with the repentance of Achab, 2 1- 3>'
that he might Aic w by (his example how eafy he is to entreat toward
Cap.2o. Ofthcmanerhowtorcceiuc
his eled, when true turning is brought to appeafe him. Therefore in
^fa*ico the Pfalme he blameth the Icwes , that they hauing by experience
'• proued him Co eafy to ^ranc their prayers, yet within a htlc after re-
turned to the ftubborrtes of their nature. Which alfo piamely ap-
peareth by the hiftory of the ludgesrnarficly that fo oft as they wept,
although their ceares were deceirfull, yet they were delmered out
of the handes of their enemies. As therefore the Lord indifferently
bringcth forth his funne vpon the good and the euell : fo doth he
alfo not defpife rheirweepinges, whofe caufe is righteous and their
miferies wooithy of helpe. In the meane time he no more heareth
ihefc to faluation $ than herein miniftreth foode to the defpifers of
j«n. i8 his goodnes.The queftion feemeth to be fomwhat harder of Abraha
' ^ and Samuel;of whom the one being warranted by no word of God,
[I *°* prayed for the Sodomites : the other againft a manifeft forbidding
[ere. jr. prayed for Saul.Likcwife is it of leremie, which prayed that the citic
i<. might not be deftroyed.For though their requeftes were denied, yet
it femeth bardt to take faith from them. But this folution fhail (as I
truft) fatisfic fober readers : that they being inftruded with the genc-
rall principles, whereby God comaundcth them to be mercifull eocn
alfo to the vnworthy,were not ahogcther without faith,although in
Libr.de a fpeciail cafe their opinion deceiued them Auguftine writeth wifely
mDei in a certaine place. Howe (faith he) do the holy ones prav by faith,
kxca.i. j^ ^^jjg of God contrarie to that which he hath decreed ? Eucn be-
caufe they pray according to his wilhnol that hidde & vncheangea-
blcwilljbut the will which heinfpirethinto them)thathcmay heare
them after an other manner : as he wifdy makcth differencc.This is
well laid : becaufe after his incomprehenlible counfell he fo tempe-
reth the fucccifes of things,that the prayers of the holy ones be not
voyde which are wrapped both with faith and crrour together.
Neither yet ought this more to auaile to be an example^o followe*
than it excufeth the holy ones themfelucs ,whome Idenie not to
haue pafled meafure. Wherefore where appeareth no certaine pro-
mifejwe muft af ke of God v/ith a condition adioined.To which pur-
!>fal.7. pofe ferueth that faying of Dauid. Watch to the iudgemcnc which
'» thou haft commaunded: becaufe he telleth that he was warranted
by a fpeciail oracle to af ke a temporall benefite.
16 This alfoir is profitable to note , that thofe ihingswhichi
haue fpoken of the fower rules of right prayer , are not fo exadly re-
quired with extreme rigor , that God refufeth the prayers in which
he (hall not finde either perfe^ faith or perfect repentance together
with a ferucntneffe of zele and well ordered rcqueftes.We haue faid
thae
. The grace of Chfi ft. Lib.3. 359
that although prayer be a familiar talke of the godly with God , ycc
we muft kcpc a reucrecc and modcftic,chat we gcue not loofe rcines
to aJI rcqueftes whacfoeucr they be,and that we dctirc no more than
God gcucth leauecand then, leaft the maiefty of God fhould growc
in contempt with vs, that we muft lift ourmindes vpwardto apurc
& vndefiled worlhipping of him.This no man hath euer performed
with fuch purenefTe as it ought to be. For (to fpeakc nothing of the
common fort) howe many copLuntcsof Dauid dofauorc of vntem-
perance:not that he meant of purpofetoquaiellwith God,or carpc
agamft his iudgementes: but bccaufe he fainting for weakeneflc,
found no other better comfort , dian to caft his forrowes into hif
bofome. Yea and God beareth with our childifn fpeacb and pardo-
neth our ignorance j fo oft as any thing vnaduifedly efcapcth vs : as
trucly without this tender bearing , there {houldc be nolibertieof
praying. But although Dauids minde was to fubmit himfeife wholljr
to the will of God, and he prayed with no lefle patience than deh'rc
to obteine : yet there arilc yea boile out fomctimes troublous atfec-
tious,which are much difagreing from the firft rule that wehaoc fee
Specially we may perceiuc by the conclulion of the xxxix. Pfalmc,
with howe great vehemence of forrowe that holy man was earned
away, that he could not kepc meafurc.Cefle (faith he) fro me,til I go
away and be not.A man would f?jy that he like a defperate mandcfi-
reth nothing els but that the hand of God cefling , he might rot in
his euels.He faith it not for that he with an auowed minde runneth
into fuch outrage , or (as the reprobate are wont) would haue God
to depart from him ; but onely he coriJ>laineth that the wfath of
God is to heauy for him to beare. In thefc tentstions alfo there fall
out oftentimes requeftes not well framed according to the rule of
the word of God,and in which the holy ones do not fufficiently wey
what is lawfull and expedient. Wharloeuer prayers are fpotted with
ihefe faultes.they deferuc robe refufedryct if the hojy ones do
bewaile,corred themfelues,and by & by come to themfelucs againe,
God pardoneth them. So they offend alfo in the fecond rule.bccaufc
they arc oftentimes driuen to wraftle with their ownc coldene{re,&
their needc and mifcry doth not iharply enough pricke then) to pray
carQcftly. And oftentimes it happeneth that their mindes do llippc
afide , and in a manner wander away into vanitie. Therefore in this
bchalfe alfo there is neede of pardon, leaft our faint, or vnperfed,oc
broken and wandering prayers hauc a deniall. This God hath na*
turally planted in the mindes of men , that prayers are not pcrfe^
but with mindes hftcd vpwarde* Hereupon came the cercmonic of
v^ap.2o. Or the raaner how to receiiic
lifting vp of handes,as; we hsue before faid,\vhich hath bene vCed iit
all ages and nations, asyec it is in vre.F3iithowe many a one is there,
which when he lifteth vp his hands, doch not in his ownc confciencc
finde himfelfe dull , bccaufe his he.irt reHeth vpon the groundc ? As
touching the af king of forgeuenelfe of (innes, although none of the
faithful do ouerpalfe it,yet they which are truly exercifed in prayers
do fele ih.it they bring fcarcely the tenth part of that facrilice , of
Pial 51. Yvlijch Dauid fpcaketh. An acceptable facrifice to God is a troubled
(pirit : a bro!<en and humbled heart O God thou wilt ndt defpife. So
there is alway double pardon to be a( ked,both becaufe chey knowc
thcmfclues gilty in cofcicnces of many faultes,with feeling whereof
t!)cy are not yet fo touched, that they miflike themfelucs fo much as
they ought: and alfo thar, fo much as it is giuen them to profit in re-
pentance and in the feare of God , they being throwen downe with
iuftforrowe for their ofienfeSjfhouldpfay to cfcape thepunifliment
of the iudge. Chetely the feblenelfe or imperfedion of faith cor-
ruptcth the prayers of the faithful, vnlefTe the tcndremercic of God
did helpc them. But it is no maruell that God pardoneth this default,
which doth oftentimes exercife them that be his with fharpc inftruc-
lions , as if he would of purpofe quench their faith. This is a moft
hardc tentation, when the faithfull are compelled to crie : How long
wilt thou be angry vpon the prayer of thy feruant ? as though the
pfj.So. ygj-y prayers made God more angry.So whe Icremicfaith.Thc Lord
lam. 3. j^^j^ ^yj Q^j. j^y praycr,it is nodout that he was (haken with a violet
pange of trouble. Inriumcrable fuch examples are commonly found
in the fcriptures , by whiclihppeareth that the faith of the holiooes
was oftentimes mingled and tofTed with doutinges, that in beleuing
and hoping they bewrayed yet fome vnfaithfulnefle:but bicaufc they
come not fo far as it is to be wifhed,they ought to endcuor fo much
the more that their faults being amended,they may daily come nercr
to the perfed rule of prayin2,and in the meane time to fele in howc
great a depth of eucls they be drowned , which euen in the very re-
medies do get to themfelucs newe difcafes: fith there is no prayer,
which the Lorde doth not worthily loth , vnkfTe he winke at the
fpottes wherwith they arc all befprinkled.I rehcrfe not thefe things
to this endc that the faithfull Ihould carelefly pardon themfelucs any
thing , but that in (harpiy chaftifing themfelucs they fhould trauailc
toouercome thefe ftoppes,and although Satan laboure to ftoppc vp
all the waycs,that he may kepc them from praying, yet neuerthelcfle
they (hould breakc through.being certainly perfwadedjthat although
they be not vncombred of all hinderances,yec their cndeuors do
plcafe
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j. 5^0 v
plcafc Gocl,& their prayers arc allowed of himjfo f they trauaile and
bende thefelucs thithcrward,wheiher they do not byandby attainc
17 But forafmuch as there i^ no man woorthy to prefcnt himfclfc
to God , and to come into his fi^ht:thc heaucnly Father himfelfc to
deliucr vs both from fhanie and feare which fliould hauc throwen
downc all our courages, hath gcuen to vs his fonne Icfus Chrift our
Lordc , to be an aduocate and Mediator with him for vs , by whofc i.Tim.)
leading we may boldly come to him , trufting that wc haue fuch an 5'
inccrcefl'or, nothing (hail be denied vs which we afkc in his name,3s ^^^ '
nothing can be denied him of the Father. And here vnto muft all be
referred whatfoeucr wc haue heretofore taught cocerning faith:by-
caufe as the promife fetteth out vnto vs Chrift for our Mediator , fo
vnleffe our hope of obtcining ftay vpon him , it takeih from it fclfc
the bencfite of praying. For fo foone as the terrible maicfty of God
Cometh in our minde, it is impolTiblc but that we fliould tremble for
fcare,& theacknowlcdgingof our ownvnwoorthincffcfhoulddriuc
vs far away, till Chrift come meane bctwenc vs and him , which may
change the throne of dreadfull glorieinto the throne of graccras alio
the Apoftletcachcththatwemay bebouldetoappeare with alcon^ ,- *
fidence which ftiall obteine mercy and finde gi^ace in helpc coming
in fit feafon. And as there is a lawe fet that wc ftiould call vpon God
like as there is a promife gcuen , that they ihalbe heard which call
vppon him : fo arc we peculiarly commannded to call vppon him in
the name of Chrift, and wc haue a promife fet forth , that wc ftiall
obtcine that which we ftiall afke in his namc.Hetherto ffaith he) ye loh.f 4
hauc not af ked any thing in my name : afke and ye ftiall rcceiue. In * 5* ^^
that day ye fliall afke in my name,and whatfoeucr ye afkc, I will do, ^ '***
that the father may be glorified in the fonne.Herby it is plainc with-
out controuerfie, that they which call wpon God in any other name
than of Chrift, do ftubbornly breake his co,mmaundements,and rc-
garde his will as nothing, and that they haue no promife to obtcine
any thing. For (as Paule faith) all the promifes of God arc in Chrift, »-Corj
yea and Amen,that is to fay,thcy are confirmed and fulfilled. ^'**
18 And y circunftance of the time is dihgetly to be marked,wherc
Chrift comaundtth his difciples to flee to interccfl'io to him after that
he is gone vp into heaucn.ln that houre (faith he)yc (hall afkc in my ^^ '*
name. It is certain y euen from the beginning none were hcardc that
prayed,but by meane of y Mediator. For this reafon y Lord had or-
deined in the law,y the pricft alone entring into y (anduaric, ftjould ^
bcare vpo his {houldcrs the names of the tribes of Ifraell, & as many ^ ^] ^
precious ftc§es be/ore his breaft:but the people (hpuld ftad si f^r of in ^t.
v>ap.2o. KJi tne maner now to receiuc
the porche,& from thenfe fliooldioine their prayers with the pricft.
Yea and the (acriHce auailed hcrcto,that the prayers iliould be made
fure and offeree. Therefore that IhadowiQi ccremonieof the lawc
taught that we are all ihutt out from the face of God, and that ther*
fore we neede a Mediator,which may appeare m our name, and may
beare vs vpon his lhoulders,and holde vs faft bound to his brratt,that
we may be heard in his perfon : then that by fprinkehng ofbloode
our prayers are cleanfed, which (as we haue already faid) are neuer
voide of filthinefle. And we fee that the holy ones,wbcn they defired
to obteine any thing, grounded their hope vpon facrifices, bycaufc
they knewe them to be the ftablifhings of all requelks. Let him re-
membrc thy oflfiing (iayeih Dauid) and make thy burnt offring fatr.
Hereupon is gathered that God hath bene from the begmnmg ap-
peafcd by the intercefTion of Chrift , to receiue the prayers of the
godly Why then doth Chrift apoint a newe heire , when his Difci-
pleslhallbeginne to pray in his name,butb(caufe this grace, as it is
at this day more iilorious,fo deferueth more commendation with vs.
And in this fame fenfe he had faid a litle before. Hetherto ye haue
not af ked any thing in my namemow af ke.Not that they vnderftood
nothing at all of the*office of the Mediator (whereas all the lewes
were inftruded in the principles) but becaufe they had not yet clere-
ly knowen that Chrift by his afcending into heauen fliould be a
furer patron of the Church than he was before. Therefore comfort
their greefe of the abfciice with fome fpcciall frute,heclaimeth to
himfelf the office of an aduocatejSi teacheth that tbey haue hitherto
wanted the chiefe benefice, which it ihalbe graunted them to enioy,
when being aided by his mediation , they fhall more freiy call vpon
kb.io. God : as the Apoftle faith that his newe way is dedicate in his blood.
'o. And (6 much lefle excufable is our frowardnes , vnleflc we do with
both armes(as the faying is)embrace fo incftimable a benefite,which
is proprely apointed for vs.
N 19 Nowc whereas he is the onely way , and the onely entrie by
which it is graunted vs ro come in vnto God-.whoe fo do fwarue from
this way and forfakc this encrie ,for them there rcmainethno way
nor entrie to God: there is nothing left in his throne but wrath,
iudgement,3nd terrour. Finally fith the Father hath marked him for
our heade , and guide,they which do in any wife (warue or go away
from him;do labore as much as in them Heth to race out & disfigure
the marke which God hath imprinted.So Chrift is fer to be the only
Mediator, by whofe interccffion the Father may be made to vs fauo •
lablc and cafy to be entreated. Howe be it in the me^e lime the
holy
The grace ot Chrilt. Lib.3. 351
holy oneshaue their interccflions left to them .whereby they do
mutually commend the faferie one of an other to God, of which the
Apoftle maketh mention : but thofe be fuch as hangc vpon that one '-Tia*
oncly intcrccffion : fo farre is it of, that they miniili any thing of ic.
For as they fpringc out of the aftedion of loue , wherewith we em-
brace one an other, as the mcmbrcs of one body : fo they are aJfo
referred to the vnitie of the hcadc.Siih therefore they alfo are made
inrhename of Chrift,whatdo rhcy els buttcftjfie thatnomannc
cannebe holpcn by any prayers at all, but with the interctflionof
Chnftj' And as Chrift with his interceffionwithftandethnot jbut
that in the Church we may v/ith prayers beaduocates one for an
other ;ro Ut this remaine certaine , that all the intcrccfTorsof the
whole Church ough t to be diredcd to that onely one. Yea and for
this caufc we ought fpecially to be beware of vnihr,nkefulncfi'e , by-
caiifc God pardoning our vnworthincffe , doth not onely £;eue Icaue
to cuery one of vs topray forhimfclfe, but alfo admitteth vstobe
cntreaters one for an other. For, where God appointethaduocatcs
for his Church which deferue worthily tobcrcieded if they pray
priuately eucry one for himfelfe : what a pride were it to abufe this
libcrtie to darken the honoure of Chrift?
20 Nowe it is a mearc trifclirig,which the Sophifters bablcjthac
Chrift is the Mediatour of rederoption,but the faithful! arc Media-
tours of intcrccffion. As though Chrift hauing perfourmed a Media-
tion for a time , hathgcuen to his feruauntes that etcrnall Media-
touriliippc which (hall neuer dy. Full courteoufly forfoth they hadlc
him, that cutteaway fo little a portion of honor from him. But the
Scripture faith farrc othcrwifc , with the Hmpliciiie whereof a godly
man ought to be conientcd,lcauing thefe deceiucrs.For where lolin ^•'^o\i,
faith,thatif any do finne,we baue an aduocatc with y Father, Chrift **
lefus : doth he meane that he was ones in olde time a patrone for vs,
and not rather aftigneth to him an euerlafting interceriiion?Howe fay
we to this that Paule alfo affirmeth,that he fitteth at the right handc Fom. 8.
of God the'Father and makcih interceflion for vs ? And when in an ? »•
other place he calleth him the onely Mediatour of God and men: '•^^" ^*
mcaricth he not of prayers , of which he had a little before made ^^^^
mention?' For when he hadde before faid that intcrceftion muft be p,
made for all men ; for proofe of that faying , he by and by addcth,
that of all mcnne there is oneGodandoneMediatcur. And none
othcrwifc doth Auguftine expounde it,whcn hcfaith thus:Chiifhan Lib.cS-
mennc do mutually commendc thcmfclucs in their prayers . But "*J*^'*
he for whom none maketh interccflion^but he for all, he is the only **^*''*
ZZ
Cap. 20. Ut the mancrhowto rcceiuc
and true Mcdiatour. Paulc the Apoftle, though he were a principall
membre vnder the hcade (yet bycaufc he was a membre of the body
ofChrift,andknewe that the greateft and trucftpricft of the Church
cntred , not by a figure , into the inward places , of the vaile , to the
holy of holy places , but by expreflc & ftedfaft trueth into the inner*
Rom ir nioft places of heauen, to a holincfle not fliadowifh but cternall) co-
30. mendeth himfeife alfo to the prayers of the faithful!. Neither doth
Ephc.tf. he make himfeife a Mcdiatour bctwene the people and God , but
^' . prayeth that all the membres of the body of Chrift fhould mutually
I .Cor*. P^^y ^^^ him:bycaufe the membres are carefull one for an otherrand
12,2$, if one membre fuffer,the other fufFer with it. And that fo the mutuall
prayers one for an other of all the membres yet trauailing in earth,
may afcends to the head which is gone before into heauenjn whom
is appeafemet for our finnes.For if Paul were a Mediatour,the other
Apollles {hould alfo be Mediatours : and if there were many Me*
diatours,then neither ihould Paules own reafon ftande faftjin which
^P"'4-3 he hadde faid,For there is one God,oneMediatourof one God and
menne, the mannc Chrift, in whom we alfo are one if wc kcepc the
vnitie of fiirh in the bondc of peace. Againe in an other place. But if
thou feke for a Pricft he is aboue the heauens, where hemaketh in-
In pfal. terceffio for thec,which in earth died for thee. Yet do we not dreamc
94« that he fallcth downe at the fathers knees and in humble wife en-
treateth for vs ; but we vnderftand with the Apoftle , that he fo ap-
peareth before the face of God,that the vertue of his death auaileth
to be a pcrpetuall interceflion forvs: yetfo that being cntred into
the fanduarie of heauen,vnto the ende of the ages of the world he
alone carrieth to God the prayers of the people abiding a farre of
in the porche.
21 As touching the Saintcs , which being deadc in the flefh do
liue in Chrift, if we geue any prayer at all to them, let vs not dreame
that they themfelues haue any other way of afkinge , than Chrift
which onely is the way,or that their prayers be acceptable to God
in ally other name.Therfore fith the Scripture calleth vs backe from
all to Chrift onlyifith the heauenly fathers wil is to gather together
all in him:it was a point of to much dulnes,! wil not Cay madnes,fo to
defire to make for our felues an entricby them,that wc fhould be
leddc away from him without whome euen they them felues haue
no entrie open.But, that this hath bene vfually done in certaine ages
paft , and that it is at this day done wherefoeucr Papiftry reigneth,
who can denie ? Their mcrites are from time to time thruft in , to
obtcine the good will of God : and for the raoft part , Chrift being
paffcd
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j. 3(^2
paHed ouer , God is prayed to by their names. Is not this , T belechc
you to conucy away to ihcm the office of that onely intercefiion,
which wehaue affirmed to belong to Chnft alone? Agame, what.
Angel or Deuell euer reueled to any man anyone fyllable of this
their intercefiion which thefc men fame ? For in the Scripture is no-
thing of it. What IS the rcafon therefore of inuenting it ?Truely,
when the witte of man fo feketh for it felfe fuccoures,wherewith wc
are not certified by the word of God,it plainly bcwrayeth his ownc
diftruftfulnefle. If we appeale to all their confciences that are delitcd
with the intercefiion of faintes,we fhall tinde that the fame comerh
from no other ground,but becaufe they are greued with carefulncs,
as though Chrift were in rhis behalf either to weake or to rigorous.
By which doubtfulnefle fiift they difhonour Chrift, androbbe him
of the title of onely Mediatour , which as it is geuen him of the Fa-
ther for a fingular prcrogatiue ,fo ought not alfo to be conueycd
away to any other. And in this very doing they darken the glorie of
his birthjthey make voide his crofle.finally whatfoeuer he hath done
or fufired they fpoile & defraude of the due praife therof:ror all tend
to this ende that he may be in dcedc and be accompted the onely
Mediatour, And therewith they caft away the goodnefle of God,
which gaue himfelfe to be their Father. For he is not their father,
vnlefle they acknowledge Chrift to be their brother. Which they
vtterly deny vnlefte they thinkc that he beareth a brotherly aftedion
towardc them, than which there can nothing be more kinde or ten-
der. Wherefore the Scripture offereth onely him to vs,fcndethvs
to him , and ftayeth v$ in him. He (faith Ambrofe) is our mouih, by Libr.de
which wc fpeake to the Father : our eye,by which we fee the Father: ^^^ ^
our right hande , by which we offer vs to the Father, otherwife than ^^^^**
by whofe interccirion neither wc nor all the Saintes haue any thing
with God.lf they aunfwer that the comon prayers whi<;h they make
in Churches,are ended with this coclufio adioined,Through Chrift
ourLorde:this is a trifeling ftiifte : becaufe the intercefiion of Chrift
is no lefie profained when it is mingled with the prayers and mcrites
of dcade men , than if it were vtterly omitted and onely dcade men
were in our mouth. Againe,in al their Letanies,Hymnes,and Profes
where no honoris lefte vngeuen to dcade faintes , there is no men-
tion of Chrift,
21 But their folifh dulnefle preceded fo farre, that here we hauc
the nature of Supcrftition exprefledjwhich when it hath ones ftiaken
of the bridle ,is wont to make no ende of running a ftray. For after
that men ones begun to loke to the intercefiion of Saintes , by Ittle
ZZ ij
Cap.2o. Of the mancr how to recciuc
and litle there was gcucn to euery one his fpeciall doing , that ac-
cording to the diuerlky of bufincsjfomtimc one & fomtime an other
fhould be called vpon to be interceflor : then they to them felues
cuery one his peculiar Sainte , into whofe faith they comitted them-
felues as it were to the keping of fafegarding Gods. And not onely
ere t' (wherewith the prophet in the olde time reproched Ifraell) Gods
S.and yycrc fet vp according to the nubre of cities, but cucn to the numbrc
'•*3' of perfons. But fith the Saintes referre their defires to the onely will
of God , and behold it and reft vpon it : he thinkeih fooliflily , and
flc{hly,yea and fclaunderoufly of them, which affigneth to them an^
other prayer, then whereby rhey pray for thecommingof the king-
dome of God.'from which that is moft farre diftant which they fainc
to them,that euery one is with priuate affedion more partially bent
to his owne worfhippers. At length many abftained not fro horrible
facrilege,in calling nowe vpon them not as helpers but as principal!
rulers of their faluation. Lo wherunto foolifh men do fall when they
%vander out of their true ftanding, that is, the word of God. I fpcakc
not of the grofl'er monftruoufnelfes of vngodlineffe,whcrin although
they be abhominable to God, Angels, & men,they are not yet aflia-
med nor wery of thcm.They falling downe before the image or pic-
ture of Barbara,Catharine,and fuch oihcr,do mumble Pater noftcr.
Our father. This madnes the Paftors do fo not care to healc or rc-
ftraincjthat being allured with y fwete fauour of gainc they allowe it
with reioifing at ic.But although they turne fro themfeluci the blame
offohainousanoffenfe, yet by what colour will they defendethis
that Loy or Medard arc prayed vnto to looke downe vpon & helpc
their feruantes from heauen? that the holy Virgm is prayed vnto,to
commaunde her fonne to do that which they af ke? In the olde time
it was forbidden in the Councel at Carrhage,y at the alter no diredc
prayer (hould be made to Saintes. And it is likely that when the holy
men could not altogether fupprefle y force of that naughty cuftome,
yet they added at leaft thisreftraint that thepublikc prayers {hould
not be corrupted with this forme : Saint Peter pray for vs.But howc
much further hath their deuclhih importunacie ranged,which ftickc
not to geue away to deadc men that which proprely belonged onely
toGodandChnft?
2 5 But whereas they traauailc to bring ro pafle that fuch inter-
cefTion may fceme to be grounded vpon the authoritie of fcripture,
therm they labor in vaine.We read oftetimes(fay they) of the prayers
ot A ngels: & not that only:but it is faid that the prayers of the faith-
full are by their handcs cat ied into the fight of God. But if they liftc
to
The grace or Chnft. Lib.j . 3 6^
to copare holy men departed out of this prcfent lifc,to Angels ; they Hcb.i.
fhould proue that they are minillring fpirits , to whom is comitted p^*
the mimftcric to loke to our fafetie, to whom the charge is geuen to , ^^^ '
kepe vs in all our wayes,to go about vs, to admonifh and coufell vs, pfa, | ^,
to watch for vs:all which things are geuen to Angels,but not to tlie. 8.
Howe wrongfully they wrappc vp deade holy men with Angels , ap-
peareth largly by fo many diuers offices , whereby the fcripture put-
teth difference betwene fome and other fome.No man dare execute
the office of an aduocatc before an carthcly iudgejVnlefTe he be ad-
fnittcd)from whefc then hauc wormes fo great libertie,to thrutl vnto
God thofc for patrons to whom it is not read that the office is en-
joined ? Gods will was to appoint the Angels to loke vnto our faftic,
wherefore they do both frequent holy affembleSjand the Church is
a ftage to the.whcrcin they wodcr at the diuers Be manifold wifdomc
of God. Who (bconucyc away to other that which is peculiar to
them,venly they cofounde andperuert the ordre fet by God,which
ought to haue bene inuiolable With hkc hadfomneflc they proccdc
in alleging other teftimonies. God faid to Icremie;If Mofes and Sa- lerc. 15
muel (hould ftand before me> my foule is not to this people. Howe *•
(fay they)could he haue fpoken thus of deade men,vnlcflc he knewc
that they made intercedion for the liuingc?But I on the cotrary fide
gather thus, that fith it thereby appearcth that neither Moles nor
Samuel made interceffio for the people of IfracJ, there was then no
intercefTion at all of deade men. For which of the Saintes is to be
thought to be careful! for y fafetie of the people^whe Mofes cefTeth,
which in this behalfe farre pafTed al other when he liued?But if they
followe fuch flight futtelcies, to fay that the deade make mtcrciflion
for the liuingjbecaufe the Lorde faid,If they fhould make interceffio:
J will much more colorably reafon in this manerrln the extreme nc-
ccllitie of the people Mofes made not interccfTiOjof whom it is faid,
if hefhallmakeinierceflion. Therefore it is likely that none other
maketh interceffion , fith they are all fb farre from the gentlcneffc,
goodneffc, and fatherly carefulnefle of Mofes. This forfoth they get
with cauilling,that they be wounded with the fame weapons,wher-
with they thought themfelues gaily fenfcd- But it is very fonde that
a fimplc fcniece fhould fo be wreiled,becau(e the Lord pronounceth
onely that he will not fpare the ofFenfes of the peoplc,although they
had feen Mofes to be their patron , or Samuel , to whofc prayers he
had fliewcd himfclfc fo tender.Which fenfc is mofl derely gathered
put of a like place of Ezechiel. If(faiih the Lorde ) thefe three men Ete. r^
ivcr$ in y citic,Noc,Daniel.& lob, they ihall not deliuer their fonncj »4.
ZZ II)
Cap.2o. Of the mancr how toreceiue
and daughters in their righteoufnefle : but they (hall dehucr onely
their owne fouies.Whcre it is no dout that he meant if two of them
(hould happen to reuiuc againe,for the thirde was the ahue,namcly
Daniel], who (as it is knowen) did in the firft floriftiing of his youth
(hcwc an incomparable example of godlineifcdet vs then leaue them
whom y Scripture plainly fheweih to haue ended their courfe.Ther-
KA. 13. fore Paulcwhenhefpeaketh of Dauid,teacheth not y he doth with
^. prayers helpe his pofteriticj but onely that he ferued his owne time.
24 They anfwere againe:fh3ll we then take from them all prayer
of charitie,which in the whole courfe of their life breathed nothing
but charitic and merci'e ? Verily as I will not curioufly fearche what
they do, or what they mufc vpon:fo it is not likely, y they arccaried
about hether and thethcr wiih diuerfe and particular requeftes : but
rather that they do with a fbayed & vnmoucd will, long for the king-
dome of God,which ftandeth no lefle in the deftrudio of the wicked
than in the faluation of the godly. If this be true , it is no dout that
their charitie is conteined in the communion of the body of Chrirt,
and CKtendeth no furthcr,than the nature of that comunion bearcth.
But nowe though I graunc that they pray in this maner for vs , yet
they do not therfore depart from their own quietneflejto be diucrfly
drawen into earthly caresiand much lefle muft we therefore by and
by call vpon them.Neither doth it thereby foUowe that they muft Co
dojbecaufe men which liue in earth may commcnde one an otlicr
in their prayers. For this doing fcrueth for nourifhing of charitie a-
mong them , when they do as it were part and mutually take vpon
them their nectffides among themfelues. 'And this they do by the
commandement of the Lordc.andarc not without a promife, which
twoo things, haue alway the chefe place in prayer. Ail fuch confidc-
rations are farrc from the dead, whom when the Lord hath coueyed
from our companic,he hath left to vs no entcrchage of doings with
therh,nor to them with vs/o fane as we may gather by coniedures.
But if any man allege, that it isimpoflible butthatihey muft kepc
the fame charity toward vs,as they be ioincd in one Faith with vs:yet
who hath reudtd y they haue fo long cares to reach to our voices?
and fo percing eyes to watch our neceffiues?Thcy prate in their fha-
dowes I wote not what of the brightnes of the countenance of God
extending his beames vpon them , in which as in a mirror they may
from on hie behold the matters of men beneath.But to affirmc thar^
fpecially with fuch boldnefie as they dare , what is it cllcs but to go
about by the dronken dream es of our owne braine,wiihout his word
to pearce & brcakc into the hidden iudgcmcnti of God,& to treadc
the
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 3<^4
the Scriptnrc vnder fete which Co oft pronouccth that the wifdome Ro.S.tf.
of the flelh is enemie to the wifdome of God,which wholly condem-
neth the vanitie of our naturall witt , which willeth aJl our reafon to
be throwcn downe,and the onely will of God to be loked vnto of vs.
2f The other teftimoniesofScripture which they bring to de-
fcnde this their lie , they moft noughtily wrelt.But lacob (faid they)
praieth that his name & the name of his Fathers Abraham & Ifaac be Gen.4S
called vpon ouer his poftcritie. Firft let vs fee what forme of calling 1 6»
vpon this is amog the Ifraelitcs.Forthey call not vpon their Fathers,
to helpe thcm:but they befech God to remeber his feruantes Abra-
ham,lfaaCjand Jacob. Therefore their example maketh nothing for
the that fpeake to the Saintes themfelues. But becaufe thofe blockes
(fuch is their dwlnefTe) neither vnderftande what it is to call vpon the
name of Iacob,nor why it is to be called vp5;it is no maruell if in the
very forme alfo they fo childishly ftumble. Thismanerof fpecheis
not feldome founde in the Scriptures. For Efaye faith that the name '*•'*• '•
of the men is called vppon ouer the womcn,when they haue them as
their huf bandes vnder whoes charge & defenfe they liue.Therfore
the calUng vpon of the name of Abraha vpon the IfraeliteSjftandeth
in this when they conuey their pedegree from himjand doo with fo-
lemne memoric honor him for their author & parent.Neither doth
Jacob this becaufe he is careful! for the enlarging of the renome of
his name;but for ai'much as he knewe that the whole bleflednefle of
his pofteritie cofifted in the enheritance of the couenant which God
had made with him : he willieth that which he fecth fhouldbethe
chefc of all good things to them, that they be accepted in his kinred:
For,that is nothinge ells but to conuey to them the fucceflion of the
couenant.They againe when they bring fuch rcmembrace into their
prayersjdo not flee to the interceilions of deade men:but do put the
•Lorde in minde of his couenant, wherby the moft kinde father hath
promifcd that he will be fauorablc & beneficiall to the for Abrahas,
•Ifaacs.and Jacobs fakesHowe litle the holy ones did otherwife leane
vpon the merjtes of their father,thc comon faying of the Chirch in
the Prophet teftifiethjThou art our Father , and Abraham knewe v$ Efa. ^5.
not,& Ifraeli was ignorant of vs. Thou Lorde art our Father and our "^ •
redemer.And when they fay thus,thcy adde therwithalljReturne O
Lorde for thy feruants fakes : yet thinking vpon no interceflion, but
bendinge their minde to the bcne&e of the couenat.But now fith wc
haue tl« Lord lefus^in whoes hand the eternall couenant of mercy
is not onely made but alfo confirmed to vs : whoes name {houJd wc
.rather vftin our prayers? And becaufe thefc good maifters will haue
2Z iiij
Cap.2o, Of the mancr how to rcccinc
the Patrinrches to be by thefe wordes made interceflors^ I wouldc
fsine knowe of them why in Co great a route Abraham the Father of
the Chirch hath no place at all among them.Out of what finke they
feth their aduocatcs,it is not vnknowe. Let the aunfwerc me,how fit
it is that Abraha,whom God preferred aboue all othcr,and whom he
aduaunced to the hieft degree of honor, (hould be negieded & fup-
piefled. Verily when it was euidcnt that luch vfe was vnknowe to the
old Chirch, they thought good for hiding of the newnefl'e to fpcake
nothing of the oldc Fathers : os though y diuerlity of names excufcd
the newc & forged maner. But whereas fbme obicd y God is prayed
vnfo,to haue mercy on y people for Dsuids fa-ke , it doth fo nothing
at all make for defenfe of their error, that it is a moft ftrog profe for
the c5futation therof For if we cofider what perfon Dauid did beare:
he is feuered from all the aflembly of y Saintcs,y God fliould ftablifh
the couenat which he hath made in his hade. So both y couenat is ra-
ther cofidcrcd tha y ma,& vnder a figure y only intcrcelTio of Chnft
is affirmed.For it is certaine that that which beloged only to Dauid,
in fo much as he was the image of Chrift.accordeth not w any other.
26 But this forfoih moueth fome , that it is oftentimes red that
the prayers of Saintes haue bene hcard.Why fo? Euen bccaufc they
Pfa. 12. prayed.Thcy trufted in thee(faith the Prophet) & they were faued:
^' they cried,and they were not cofounded. Therefore let vs alfo pray
as they did, that wc may be heard as they wer e.But thefe men,other-
wift than they ought.do wrogfully reafon,that none flialbc heard but
thtyt! at haue ones bene heard. Howe much better doth lames fay?
Ia.ii.<>. Elias; (rayeihhe)was a manlike to vs:& he prayed with prayer that it
*7' fhould not r3ine,& it rained not vppon the earth in three ycares and
fix monethes. Againe he prayed, and the hcauen gaue raine,and the
carch gaue here frutc.What?doth he gather any lingular prtroi^atiuc
of £lias,to which wc ought to flee?No But he tcacheth what is y con-
tinual rtrength of codly & pure praier,to exhorte vs likewife to pray,
Vm- we do niggardly conftruc the rcdinefle & gentlenelfe of God in
hearing the, vnlefTe we be by fuch experiences cofirmed into a more
fureaffiace of his promifcs,invvhe promifethy his care flialbc encli*
ned not to one,or two, nor yet to a few.but to all y call vpo his name.
And fo much lefle cxculable is this foolilhnelfe , bccaufc they fecmc
as it were of fct purpofe to defpifc fo many admonitios of Scripture*
pra.142. J^^uiti was oft deliucred by the power of God.Was it that he (hould
I draw that power to himfelf,thai we (hould be deliucred by his hclpe?
POi. 5a. He himfeif affirmeth farre othcrwife:Thc righteous loke for mccill
thou tedcr to mc. AgaincjThe righteous iliali fee & they fhall reioifc,
and
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 3^5
and truft in the Lord.Behold, this poorc man hath cried to God, and Pfa. }
he hath anfwcrcd him.There be in the pfalmes many fuch pr3iers>in 7'
which to craue that which he recjuireth,he moueth God by thisma-
ner, y the righteous be not made afliamed, but may by his exaple be
raifed vp to hope well. Let vs now be contented with this one exam-
ple. Thereforceucryholy one iTiall pray to thee in fit time. Which pf^i*
place 1 hauc fo much the more wiUingly rchcarfed, bccaufc the leud 6,
babblers which do let out to hire the I'eruice of their waged tongUc
hauc not bin afliamed to alleagcitto proue the interceffion of the
dead. As though Oauid meant any thing elfe,than to {hew tbc frutc
that fliall come of the mercifulnefle and gentlenefle of God , when
he (hall be heard. And in this kindc we muft learne , that the experi-
ence of the grace of God , as well towarde our felues as other , is no
fclender help to coHrmc the credit of his promifes. I leaue vnrchear-
fed many places,where Dauid fetteth before himrelfe the benefits of
God for matter of c6fidence5becaufe the readers of the Pfalmes (lial
commonly find them without fckeing. This fclfc fame thing had la-
cob before caught by his owne example : I am vnworthy of all thy Gen j
tnercics,and of the trueth which thou halt performed to thy feruant. *^»
I with my ftaffe hauc paflcd ouer this Iordane,and now I come forth
with two bandcs . He alleagcth in dcede the promife , but not a-
lone:but he alfo ioineth the effed,that he may the more couragioul^
ly in time to come truft that God will be the lame toward him Fo*^ he
is not like to mortall mcn,which are wery of their hberality,or whofc
ability is waftcd:but he is to be wcyed by his ownc nature, as Dauid
wiftly 'ioth where he fayth , Thou haft redeemed me , O God th.^t ^^* 5'
fpeakcft trueth. After that he hath giuc to God the praifes of his fal- ^'
uation , he addeth that he is a true fpeaker : becaufe vnlcffe he wer,c
cotinually like himfelfcjthere could not be gathered of his benefices
a fufficicntly ftrong reafon of affiance & calhng vpon him.But when
we know thatfo oft as he heJpeth vs,he ftiewcth an exaple & prcpfc
of his goodneffe , we neede not to feare that our hope fhalbc put to
£hame or difapoinc vs.
27 Let this be the fummc. Whereas the Scripture fetteth out this
vnto vs for the chiefe point in the worfhipping of God, (as rcfufing
all facrificcs,he requircth of vs this duety of godlinefle) praier is not
without manifeft facrilege direded to other. Wherfore alfo it is fayd
in the Pfalmc.If we ftretch forth our hands to a ftrage God,fhall not pi-
God require thefc things?Againe,wheras God wil not be called vpo^ lu
but of Faith, & cxprefly commaudcth praiers to be framed according
to the rule of his word: finally wheras Faith founded vpon ihc word.
Cap.2o. Of the manerhowto receiue
is the mother of right prater .fo fone as wc fwaruc fro the word, our
praier muft ncedes be corrupted But it is already fhewed,that if the
whole Scripture be fought, this honoris therein chalengcd to God
only. As touching the office of interceffio,wehaue alfofhewed that
it is pecuhar to Chrift , & that there is no praier acceptable to God,
but which that mediator halloweth. And though the faithful do one
for an other ofter praiets to God for their brethren, we hauc fhewcd
that this abatcth nothing from the oncly intercefTion of Chriftibc-
caufc they altogether ftanding vpon it do comend both thefclues &
other to God. Moreouer wc hauc taught that this is vnHdy drawen
to dead men,to whom we neuer read that it hath bin commaunded
that they (hcfuld pray for vs. The Scripture doth oftentimes exhortc
vs to mutual] doings of this dueiy one for an other:but of dead men
there is not fo much as one fyllablc-yca and lames loyning thcfe two
things together , that wc fiiould cofefTe our felucs among our felucs,
& mutually pray one for an other, doth fecretly exclude deade men.
Therfore to condemnc this errour,this one rcafon fufficeth,that the
beginning of praying rightly, fpringcth out ofFaith,and that Faith
commeth of the hearing of the word of God, where is no mcntio of
the fained intcrceflion, becaufc fuperftition hath rafhly gotten to it
felfe patrones which were not giuen them of God. For whereas the
Scripture is full of many formes of praier, there is no example found
of this patronrtupjwithout which in y papacy they belcue that there
is no praier. Moreouer it is cenainc that this fuperftition hath growe
of diftruftfulncffe either bccaufe they were not content with Chrift
lo be iheir interce{rour,or hauc altogether robbed him of his praifc.
And this later point is eafily proued by their {hamelefnefle : becaufc
they hauc no ochcr ftrongcr argumet to proue that we hauc ncde of
the intercefTion of Saintes, than wh6 they obieft that wc arc vnwor-
thy of familiar acccffc to God.Which wc in dccde graunt to be moft
truerbutthereupo wegather,thatthey le^ue nothing to Chrift,which
cftcerac his intercefTion nothingc Worth , vnlelTe there be adioyned
George,Hypolite,or fuch other vifors.
i8 But although prayer properly fignifieth only wifhes & petiti6s:
yet there is fo great affinity betWene petitio & thankcfgiuing, y they
may be fitly comprehended both vnder one name.For,thcfe fpecial
fortes which Paule rehearfethjfall vnder the firft part of this diuifion.
With asking & crauing we pourc forth our defires before God,rec]ui
ring as well thofe things y feme to fprcd abroadc his glory & fet forth
his name,as the benefites that^irc profitable to our vfe.With giuingc
' df chankcs^wc do widi due praifc tnagnific his good doinges towarde
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. ^66
TJ, acknowledging to be receiued of his liberality whatfocucr good
ihingsdo come to vs.Thcrfore Dauid coprehendcd thefc two partes
together^fayingrCail vponmc in the day of necelTity : I will deliuer pfaf. j«
thecj& thou (halt glorifie me.The Sctipture not in vaine comaun- 1 5.
dcth vsto vfe both. For we haue faydin an other place that our ne«
dines isfogreat,&y experience it felfecrieth out that we arc one- "
uery fide pinched and prefTcd widi fo many & fo great diftrefles,that
all haue caufe enough why they fliould both figh to God,& in hum-
ble wife call vpon him. For though they be free from aduerfities,yet
the giltincs of their wicked doingSj& their innumerable aflaultes of
tcntadons ought to pricke forwarde the moft holy to aske remedy.
But in the facrifice of praife and thankcfgiuing there can be no intcr-
rupno without hainous Imnc/orafmuch as God ceficth not to heapc
vpon diuerfemen diuerfe benefices to driue vs though we be flacke
& floWjto thankfulnes. Finally To great & fo plenteous largefle of hii
benefits dothinamanerouerwhtlmc vs:thcrarcro many &fo great
miracles of his fene on euery fide which way focuer thou turnc thee,
that we neuer want ground and matter of praife and thankcfgiuingc.
Andjthatthefe thingcs may be fomewhat plainclierdeclared:fith all
our hopes and wealth ftand in God(which we haue before fufhcient-
\y proued)that neither we nor all our things can be in profpcrity but
by his blcftinge : we muft continually comxpa our felues and all our
tilings to him.Then,whatfoeuer we purpofe/peake^or do,lei vs pur- ^^^"- •<•
jpofe,fpcake,&do vnderhs handc & wil.finally vnder the hope of his ["^
help.For,all are pronounced accurfed of God, which dcuife or deter- 1. & 31*
mineanypurpofesvppontruftofthemfcluesorofanyother J which i.
without his wil,& without calhng vpon him do enterprife or attempt
to begin any thing. And whcras we haue diuerfe times already faid,j^
he is duely honored when he is acknowledged the author of al good *
things:therupon followeth that all thofe things are fo to be r#eiued
at his hande.that we yelde continuall thankes for them:& that there
is no other right way for vs to vfe his benefites,which flow & procedc
fro his hberality to no oihcr end, but y we Ihould be continually bu-
ficd in confefling his praife & giuing of thankes.For PauLwhcn he tc- i.Tim.4
ftificth y they are fandified by the word & praier,doth therewithal fi- 5-
gnify y they arc not holy & clcane to vs without the word & praier, ^'^^to.
vnderftandingby y word,faith by figure. Therefore Dauid faith very p^f'**!
wel,when hauing receiued y liberahty of the Lord, he dedarcth that 4, ' "^
there is giuen him into his mouth a new fong:wherby verily he figni-
fieth that it is a malitious filence.if we pafle ouer any of his benefits -
without praife : fiihhcfooft giueth vi matter to fay good of him,
Cap.20, Or the maner how to rcccuic
ri.«. as he doth good to vs. As alfo Efay fettingc out the lingular grace of
*>• GodjCrhortcththcfaithfulltoanew and vnwoncedfonge.In which
^' fcnfc Dauid fayth in an other place, Lord open thou my iippes,and
ifa. jS. n^y tnouth iliall fhew foorth thy praife .Likewife Ezechias and lonas
,o. tcftific y this (halbc to tlie the end of their dehuerancc> to celebrate
oh, II. the goodncs of God with fonges in the temple.This fame Law Da-
J* ^ uid prefcribeth to all the godly. What flial I repay to the Lord(faith
J * he)for all the thinges that he hath bcftowed vpon me?I will take the
»&,io 6 cup of faluations,and will call vpon the name of the Lordc. And the
y7* fame law the Church foloweth in an other Pralmc,Saue vs our God,
*Ci.no, jj^jjj. ^g jjj^jy confefleto thy name and glory in thy praife, Againe,he
bath looked vnto the praicr of the folitary, and he hath not defpifed
their praiers.Thiy iTialbc wryttcn to the generation that {hal follow,
and the people created (hall praife the Lordc, that they may declare
his name in him and his praife in Hierufalem. Yea fo oft as the faith-
full befecli God to do for his names fakeras they profefle themfelucs
vnworthy to obtaine any thinge in their owne name , fo they bindc
themfelues to giuc thanks,and they promifc that this fhalbe to them
the right vfe of the bountifulnes of God that they fhalbe pubhihew
>fe. 14. o^^'* ^° Ofcc fpcakinge of the redcmptioj^ to come of the Church,
|, fayth : Take away iniquity O God,and lift vp good : and wc will pay
the calues of lippes. And the benefiies of God do not oncly claime
to themfelucs the praife of the tongue,bui alfo do naturally procure
louc.l hauc loued(fayih Dauid) bccaufe y Lord hath heard the voice
»fa.ixtf of my prayer. Againc in an other place, rehcarfing the hclpcs which
'• he had fclt,he fay th;I wil loue thee O God my ftrength.Neithcr Ihal
>faLi«. jj^^ praifcs eucr plcafe God, which (hal not flow out of this fweetcncs
'hili.4 of loue.Yea and alfo we muft holde fafl this fayinge of P3ule,that all
». praiers are wrongful! and faulty to which is not adioyned giuingc of
ihanl^.For thus he fayth.in all praier and befechingc with thankcf-
giuins,letyour petitions,be knowen with God.For,fith teftinclTcteji
dioufncffcjimpaticnce, bitternes of griefe,and feare do moue many
in prayingc to murmure, he commaundeth that our afFedions be Cq
tempered, that the faithful ere they haue obtained that which they
^e(irc,fhould neuerthelelTc chcrefully blcffe God.If this knot ought
to haue place in things in a maner cotrary, with (6 much more holy
band doth God binders to fing his praifcs.fo oft as he maketh vs to
cnioy our requeftes.But as we haue taught that our praiers are hallo-
wed by the intercclTion of Chrift , which otherwife (houlde be vn-
cIeane:fo the Apoftle, where he commaundeth vs to ofter a facrificc
of praife by Chrift,putteth ji> mindc that we hauc not a roouth clean
enough
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3 ♦ 5 ^7
enough to praife the name of God , vnlcflc the pricfthodc of Chrift Hcb.i^
become the mcanc. Whereupon wc gather that men haue bin mon- * J*
ftruoufly bewitched in the papacy,where the greater part maruelcth
f Chnttis called an aduocate. This is the caufe why Paulc comaun- i.TheC
dcth both to pray and to giuc thankcs without ceflingc : namely for 5'* J*
that he willcih that with Co great codnuing as may be.at cuery time
in cuery place , in all matters and bufincfTcs , the praiers of all men
ihould be lifted vp to God, which may both lookc for al things at his
hand & yeldc to him the praife of al things,as he offreth vs continu*
all matter to praife and pray.
z^ Bdt this continuall diligence of prayingc, although it fpecially
conccrnc the propre and priuatc prayers of cuery man , yetfomc-
whatalfo pertaineth to the pubhkc prayers of the Church. But thofc
can neither be commuall , nor ought othcrwife to be done than ac-
cording to the politikc order that Ihall by comon confent be agreed
vponamongeall. I graunt the fame in dede . For therefore certainc
houres are fet & appomtcd,as indifferent with God, fo neccffary for
the vfcs of men,that the comodity of all men may be prouidcd for,
and all thmgs (according to the faying of Paul) may becomciily and
orderly done in the CKurch.But this maketh nothing to the cojrary ^^^^
but that euery Church ought both from time to time to thrre'vp it 1 5 . 4^,
felfe to often vfe of prayers, and when it is admonifhcd by any grea-
ter neceffity, to be feruent with more carneft cndcuour. As for perl
feuerance which hath a great affinity with continual diligcnce,thcrc
ftiall be a fitte place to fpeake of it about the ende . Nowe thefe
make nothing for the much babling which Chrift willed y we (hould
be forbiddcn.For he forbiddeth not to continue longc j nor oft, nor Matt.4;i
with much affeftion in praiers, but that we (houlde not truft that we 7.
may wringe any thinge out of God.by dullingc his cares with much
babbling talke, as if he were to be perfwaded after the maner of mc
For we know that Hypocrites, becaufc they do not cofider that they
haue to do with God,do no If fle make a popous fliew in their praiers
than in a triumph. For, the Pharifee which thanked God that lie was
not like to other men , without dout reioyfcd at himfelfe in the eyes
ofmen,as if he would by praier feeke to get a fame of holines. Here-
upon came that much babblinge, which at this day vpon a hkc caufc
is vCed in y papacy:whilc fome do vainly fpcnd the time in repeating
the fame praiers , and other fome do fet out themfclues amongc the
people with a logheape of words.Sith this babbling childiflily moc-
keth God, it is no maruell that ic is forbidden out of the Church, to
the end that nothing ihould there be yCcd but carneft Sc proceeding
Cap.2o. Ofthe maner hovvto receiuc
from the bottome ofthe hart.Ofa neere kinde and like to this cor-
ruption is there an other,which Chrift condemneth with thiSjnamcT
ly thathypocrits for boafting fake dofeeke tohaue many witnefles,
and do rather occupy the market place to pray injthan their praiers
(houlde want the praife ofthe worlde.But whereas we haue already
fhewed that this is the mark that praier (hooteth at,that our mindes
may be caried vpward to God,both to confeffion of praife & to era-
uinge of helpe.-thcreby we may vnderftande that the chiefe dueties
thereof do ftandin the minde & the hart,or rather that praier it felfc
is properly an afFedion ofthe inward hart, which is poured forth and
hid open before God the fearcher of hearts.Wherfore(as it is alrea*
dy fayd)the heauenly fchoolemaifter, whe he minded to fet out the
lat.^,5 belt ruieofprayingjComaundedvsto gointoourchambery& there
the dore beinge (hut to pray to our Father which is in fccvctc , that
our Father which is in fecretc may heare vs. For when he hath dra-
wen them away fro the example of hypocritesjwhich with ambitious
boafting fhew of prayers fought the fauour of men, he therewithal!
addeth what is better,namely to enter into our chamber, & there to"
pray the dore being fhut.In which words(as I expound them)he wil-
led vs to fecke fohtary beinge,whicb may helpe vs to defccnde & to
enter throughly with our whole thought into our hart,pf omifing to
the affedions of our hart that God (halbe neere vs whofe teples our
bodies ought to be.For he meant not to deny biK that it is expedient
alfo to pray in other places : but he flieweth that praier is a certainc
fecretthingjwhich both is chiefly placed in the foule,& rcquireth the
quiet therof farre from all troubles of carcs.Not without caufe iher-
fore the Lorde himfelfe alfo, when he was difpofed to apply himfelfc
morecamcftly to praier conueied himfelfe into fome folitary place
farre from the troublcfome company of men : but to teach vs by his
example that thefe helpes are not to be defpifed, by which our mind
being to flippery of it felfe is more bent to earneft applying of praier.
But in the meane time eucn as he in the middefl ofthe multitude of
men,3bftained not from praying,ifoccafion at any time fo ferued.-fo
'•Ti. ». fiiould we in all places where nede fhalbe,lift vp pure handes.FinalJy
^* thus it is to be holdc, that whofoeuer refufcth to pray in the holy af-
fcmbly ofthe godly,he knoweth not what it is to pray aparte, or in
folitarinesjorat home. Againe, that he thatnegledeth to pray alone
or priuatly how diligently foeuer he haunt publike aflemblics , doth
there make but vaine praiers:bccaufe he giueth more to the opinion
of men than to the fccrct iudgement of God.In the meane time,thac
the commo praiers ofthe Church (hould not grow into contempt,
God
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j. 3^
God in old time garnifhcd them with glorious titles, fpccially where
he called the temple the houfc ofpraier.Forjby this fayingc he both Ef«.<#,
taught that the chiefe part of the worfhipping of him is the ducty of 7.
praicr: & that to the end that the faithfull flioulde with one confent
cxercife themfelues in it,the temple was fct vp as a ftandard for them.
There was alfo added a notable promife : There abideth for thee, O .
God,praife in Sion:& to thee the vow (halbe paied.By which wordes ^ ^^
the Prophet telleth vs,that the praiers of the Church are neuer void:
becaufe the Lord alway miniftreth to his people matter to (ing vpon
with ioy.But although the fhadowcs of the law are ccfled:yct becaufe
the Lords wil was by this ceremony to nourifli among vs alfo the ?-
nity of faithjit is no dout that the fame promife belogeth to vs,whicii
both Chrift hathftablilhed with his ownc moui:h,and Paul tcacheth
that it is of force for euen
30 Now as the Lord by his word comaundeth the faithfull to vfc
common praiers:fo there muft be comon temples appointed for the
vfing of them:whcre who fo refufe to communicate thetr praier with
the people of God,therc is no caufe why they fliould abufe this prc-
tenfe,that they enter into their chamber that they may obey the co-
maundemec of the Lord.Forhethatpromifeththathe wildo what- Mat il,
foeuer two or three (hall aske beinge gathered together in his name, lo,
teftifieth that he defpifeth not praiers openly madc:fo that boaftmgc
and feking of glory of men be abfent,fo that vnfained & true affcdio
be prefent which dwellcth in the lecrec of the hart.If this be the right
vfe of temples (as trucly it is) we muft againc beware that neither (m
they haue begon in certaine ages paft to be accomptedjwe take them
for the proper dwellinge places of God from whenfe he may more
nerely bende his care vnto vs: nor faine to them I wote not what fc-
crete hohneflc , which may make our praier more holy before God.
For fith we our felues be the true teples of God we muft pray in our
felues if we will call vpon God in his own holy temple. As for f groC-
neflejet vs which haue a commaundement to call vpon the Lord ia
Spirit and tructh without difference of place, leaue it to the Icwes or
the GentilcsThere was in dede a temple in old time by the comaun-
dement of God for offringe of praiers and facrifices : but that was at ^^^"'<*
fuch time as the truth lay hid figured vnder fuch lhado\vcs,which be- *^*
ing now liuely cxprefled vnto v8 doth not fufter vs to ftick in any ma-
teriall tcmple.Neithcr was the temple giucn to the lewes themfelues
with this condition,that they fliould enclofe the prefence of God,vvin
the wallesthereof,but whereby they might be exeicifed to beholde Efa.^tf,
the image of the true temple . Thcrfore they, which in any thought *•
Cap.2o. Of the maner howto rcceiuc
^^ 7« that God dwclletli in temples made with handes, were (liarply rebu*
'"• kcd of Elay and Stephen.
3 1 Here morcouer it is more than cuidcnt5that neither voice nor
fongjif they be vfed in praier, haue any force, or do any whit profitc
before God,vnlefle they precede from the depe affedio of the hare.
But rather they prouoke his wrath againft vs,if rhcy come only from
the lippes and out of the throterforafmuch as that is to abufe his holy
name, and to make a mockery of his maiefty:as we gather out of the
words of Efay,which although they extendc rurther,yet pcrtainc al'
foto reproue this fault.This people(fayth he)commeth nere to with
their mouth and honoreth me with their lippes but their hart is farrc
from me : andthcy haue feared me with the commaundement and
dodrinc of men. Therefore beholde I will make in this people a mi-
racle great and to be wondered at:For,wifdom fliall perilh from their
wife men,and the prudence of the Elders fhall vanifh away . Neither
yet do we here condemne voice or finging, but rather do hiely com-
mcnde them,fo that they accompany the affedion of the mmde.Fof
fotheyexercife thcmindc and holdeit intcntineinthinkingevpon
God:which as it is flippery and rolling, eafiiy flacketh and is diuerfe-
ly drawcn vnlefle it be ftayed with diuerfe belpf s.Moreouer whereas
the glory of God ought after a certainc maner to lliine in al the parts
of our body , it fpecially behoueth that the tongue be applied and a-
uowcd to this feruice both m fingingc and in fpeakinge which is pro-
perly created to fliewc foorth and difplay the praife of God. But the
chicfe vfe of the tonoue is in pubhke praicrs , which arc made in the
aflemblyofthe Godly;which tende to this ende,that wc may ali with
one common voice , and as it were with one mouth together glorific
Godjwhom we worfhip with one Spirit & one Faith:and that open-
ly , that all men mutually, euery one of his brother, may receiue the
tonftflion of Faithjto the example wherof they may be both allured
and ftirred. v
:^i As for the vfe of finging in Churches (that T may touch this al-
fo by the way)it is certaine that it is not only moft auncient : but that
it was al(b in vfe among the Apoftles, we may gather by thefe words
of Paule, I will fing in Spirit, I will fing alfo in minde. Againe to the
Coloflians, Teachingc and admonifhingc you, mutually in hymnes
pfalmes,and fpirituall ionges, finging with grace in your hearts to the
Lord. For in the firft place he teacheth that we iliould fing with voice
and hart : in the other he commendcrh fpirituall fonges , wherewith
the Godly do mutually cdifie themfelucs. Yet that it was not vniucr-
Tall, Auguftinc ieftifiech,whichreportcth that in the time of Ambrofe
the
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 3<^p
thc'Ghurch of Mjlbin firft bcgannc to fingc,whcriwhilc luftina the
modlcr of Valcminian cruelly raged againft y true Faith,thc people
more vfcd wacchingsthan they were wonc and that aftcrwarde the
other wcfterne Churches followed. For he hadde a litle before Hiyd
that tliis mancr came £1 am the Eafterne Churches.He tellcth alfo in
his feconde booke of RetraAacions that it was in his; time rccciued in
Africa. One Hilarie(Ciy rh he)a ruler did in cuery place whcrefoeucr
he couldjwith malicious blaming raile at the mancr which the began
•to be at Cnrthagc,that the hymnes at the altar fhoulde be pronoun^
ced out of the booke of PfalmesjCither before the oblation,or when
^hat which had bin offered was diihibuted to y pceple.Him I anfwc-
Tcd at the commaimdement of my brethren. And true ly if fong be te*.
pered to y grauity which bccommcth the prcfencc of God & Angels,
it both procureth dignity and grace to th e holy actions , and much
auailech to ftirre vp the mindes to true affcdion, and fcrueninefTc of
5)rayingc. But wc muft diligently beware that our eares be not more
iccdcfully bent to the norc , than our mindes to the fpirituall fenfe
of the words.With which peril Auguftine in a certain place faith y he Cofe(r
yns Co moucd , that he fomtimc wifhed that the mancr which Atha- ''^•' *•
nafiuskeptjfhouldbc ftablifhed.whichcommaiinded that the reader ^^'^^
{hould founde his wordrs with fo fmall a bowinge of his voice, that ic
fhould be liker to one that readeth than to one that fingeth.But when
he remcmbred how much profit he himfelfe bad rccciued by finging,
he endined to the other (ide.Therfore vling this moderation,therc
is no dout that it is a moft holy & profitable ordinance. As on the o-
thcr fide what fongs fo cuer are framed only to fwectencs and dehtc
of the earcsjthey both become not the maicfty of the. Church & can
jiot but hicly difpleaie GckI Vr .. —
J J Whcrby it alfo plamely appeareth that common praiers arc to
be fpoken not in Greeke amongc Latinc men, nor in Lacine amongc
Frenchmen or Englifhmcn (as it hath heretofore bin ech where co-
-monly done ) but in the peoples mother tongue , which commonly
may be vndcrftoodc of the whole aflcmbly: forafmuch as it ought to
be done to the edifying cf the whole Church, which receiue no frute
at all of a founde not vnderftanded.But they which haue no regarde
neither of charity nor of h'^manity, fhould at leali haue bin fomwhac
moued with the authority of Paule,whofe wordes arc nothing dout- ^ ^
ful.If thou blc(rc(fayth he) in Spirit,how ihal he that fijicth the place ,' ^f
of an vnlcarnedmananfwerc Amentoihy bleiTine,iith heknoweth
not what thou fayft?For thou in dedc giueft thankes » but the other is
not edified. Who thccefbre can fufificicntly wonder n the vubridcled
AAA
^^ap.2o. uttnemancrnowtorccciuc
licentioufn^flc of chc Papilles,which,thc Apoftlc Co openly cryinge
outagainftic , fcarenotto roare out inaftrangc rongue moft fcab**
blms praicrSjin which they thtmfelucs fometimc vnderftand not one
fyllable.nor wouldchaue other folkes to vndcittanditJ'But Paul tea -
clieth that we ought to do otherwifeiHow then?I will pray (faith he)
with fpirif jl will pray alfo with minde:! wil fing with fpirit:! will fing
alfo with mindcrfignifyingby the name of Spiritc,the lingular gift of
tongues, which many being endued with abu fed it,whcn they fcuered
it from the mind,that is, from vnderftandmg. But this we muft alto-
gether thinke,that it is by no meane polTiblCineither in publike nor
in priuate praicr,but that the tongue without the hart muft hiely di**
fplefe God. Morouer we muft think that the mind ought to be kind-
led with ferucntneffe of thought , that it may farrc furmount all that
the tongue may exprefle with vtterancc. Finally that y tongue is not
ncceffary at all for priuate praier, but fo farre as the mward feelingc
either is not able to fuffice to enkmdlc it fclfe , or the vehemence of
enkindling violetly caricih the worke of y tongue with it.For though
verv ooodpraiers fomtime be without voice, yet oftetimcs bctidctb,
that when the affcdi6 of the minde is feruent,both the tongue brca-
kcth foorth into voice , and the other members into gefturing with-
i.Sam.i out excefliue {hew. Hereupon came the muttering of Hanna,and fuch
' h -a hke thin^^e all the holy ones alway feele in themfelucs , when they
burft out into broken and vnpcrfed voices. As for the geftures of the
body which are wont to be \kd in praier(js knehng and vncouering
of the head ) they are exercifes by which we endeuour to rife vp to a
greater reucrcncing of God.
54 Nowe we muftlearne not onely a more ccrtaincrule,but3lfo
Matt.^. *^ic very forme of prayinge ; namely the fame , which the hcaucnly
9. Father hath taught vs by his beloued Sonne! : wliercin we may ac-
know his vnmefurable goodneife and kindtrneffc. For belide this he
Luk.i*. vvarneth and cxhorteih vs to feeke him in all our neccfllty , (as chil-
*' drenarewontfo flee to their fathers defence, fo oft as they be trou-
bled wi>h any diftreifc ) becaufe he fawe that we did not liifficicntly
pcrceiue this, how fclender our pouerty wis, what were mecte to be.
askrd,& what were for our profif.he prouided alfo for this our ii'no-
rance,3nd what our capacity wanted,hc lupphed and furniflied of bis
own For he hath prefcnbed to vs a forme whcrin lie hath as in a Ta-
ble fetoutwhatfo! uer wc may dclircof him,wiiatroeucraunil-th for
©ur profir,& wharfoeuer is necefil^ryto aske. Of which his getlenes
weieceauc a {^rcatfrute ofconr.fort thatwe vndciftjnd that we nskc
no inconucnicnt thingino vnfccaiinge or vnfic thing,tinal]y nothing
•'A A ihat
The graceof Chrift. Lib.3. 370
that is not acceptable to him, fith wc a$kc in a mancr after his ownc
mouth.Whe Pbto faw the folly of men in making rcqutftcs to God, ^Jcib i
which being grauntedjit many times bcfel much to their own hurt: vel de
he prono'-nced ihntthisis the beft mancr of prayingc taken out of ^o^
theoldcPoetc , Kmee luppitcr giuc vntovs thebcft thinges bo(h
when wc aske thcm.and when we do not aske thcm,but commaund
cuil things to be away from vs euen when wcaskc them. And verily
the heathen man is wife in this , that he judgeihhowe perillous itiss
to aske of the Lord that which our owne dcfirc moueth vs;& thcrc-
withil he bewraieth our vnhappy cafcihat we can nor ones ope our
mouthes before God without danger, vnielTc the Spirite do inlhud ^00^8.
vs to a right rule of prayinre. And in fomiich greater tftimntion this *'
priuilcge is worthy ro be had of v. jfith theonely begotten Sonne of
God miniUreth words into our mouth which may dcliuer our mindc
from all douring.
55 This whither ycu call ir forme or rule of praying is made of (Tx
petition^. For, the caufc why I agree not to them that diuidc it into
feucn p3rrs,i$ this,that by putting in this aduerfatiuc word(But)it fe«
meth that the Euangelft ment to ioyne thcfe two peces togcthcr,a$
if he; had faid : Suffer vs not to be oppreflcd with tentation but rather Augnft.
help our vveakenes,& deliuer vs,that we faint not.Tlie old writers al- '" ^"
forhiiikcon our lide,fo that nowe that which is in Mathcw added in S'[
the fcuenrh placc,is by way of declaratio to be ioyned to the fixt pe- rent.c»
tition.But although the whole praier is fuch that in euery parte ofit ii5.
regarde is fpecially to be had of the glory of God, yet the three firft ^-hrvf.
petitions are peculiarly appoynted to Gods- glory, vv alone wc ou^ht ^"^ .^
in them tolocke vnto without anv refped (as they fay) of our owne p^.^ ^
profit.Thc other three haue care of vs , and are properly afligncd to
aske thofe thingcs that are for our profite. As when we pray that the
name of God be hallowedrbecaufc God wil prone whether he be lo-
tted & honored of vs freely or for hope of rcward,wc muft the i hinkc
nothing of our owne comodity:but his glory muli be fet be ore vs^vf
alone we mnft behold with fised eies:& no otherwife ought wc to be
minded in Mic other praiers of this fort. And euen this turncth to cur
great profit, f when it is fanftified as wc pray,it is alfo hkewifc made
our fandification. Butcur eyes (as iti$fayd)muft winke and aftcra
certaine maner be blindeatfuchprofitjfo as they may not ones lokc
at it.'that if all hope of our pnunt bencfi.: were cut of, yet we ihouldc
ncrtceaflc ro wilhc and pray for this fandification and other tbinges ^'^o-J*
which pertainc to the glory of God. As it is feenc in the examples of j^^
M«fc$ aad Paulc , ro whom it was not gricuous to turns away their j.
AAA ij
Cap.2o. Of the maner howtoreceiuc
mindes and eyes from themfelucSjand with vehement and cnHamed
zeale to wifh their ovfhc dcftrudiou that though it were with their
ownc lofTc they might auancc the glory & kingdom of God. On the
Other fide when we pray that our daily bread be giucn vs: although
we wifh f which is for our owne commodity,yct here alfo we ought
chiefely to fccke the glory of God, fo that we fliould not aske it vn-
IclTc it might turnc to his glory.Now let vs come to the dccbring of
chcpraicritfelf.
C?«r Tather rrhich art in heauen.
'^6 Firftin the very entry we mete with this which wc faid before
that ail praier ought none otherwife to be offred of vs to God than
in the name of Chrift , as it can by no other name be made accepta-
ble vnto him. For fincc wc call him Father , trucly wc alleagc for vs
the name of Chrift . For by what boldnefl'c might any man call God,
Father ? who fliouldc burlt foorth into fo great rafhneffe , to take to
himfclferhehonor of theSonncof God, vnlcflc we were adopted
lohn.r. the children of grace in Chriftr Which being the true Sonnc,isgiuc
I » of him to vs to be our brother : that that which he hath proper by
i.Ioh. } nature,may by the bencf te of adoption be made ours , if we do with
PfaUa? ^^^^ ^*"^^^ embrace fo great bountifulnefle. As John fayth.that power
10. is giuen to the which belcuc in the name of the only begotten Sonne
Efa. 61. of God, that they alfo may be made the children of God.Thcrcfore
'**. he both callcthhimfelfeourFatlier, & will be fo calk d of vs, by this
3. jm. a Cyy(.j.tgneffg of name deliuering vs from all diftruft, fith there can no
where be found any greater aftedion of looc than in a Father.Thef-
forc he could by no lurer example teftifie his vnmeafnrable dere louc
toward vs than by thisthat we are named the fonnes of God.Bat his
louc is fo much greater & more excellent toward vs than all louc of
our parcntcs , as he paffeth all ram in goodncfle and mercy : that if
all the fathers that are in the earth, hauing (haken of al feeling of fa-
therly naturalneffc, would forfike their children,yet he wil ncuer faile
Matt 7 ^s>^^caure he can not deny himfclfe.For wc haoc his promife, If you
, , . * * beingc cuill can giue good gifres to your children , how much more
Efa. 4^. can your Father which is in heauen f" A gainc in the Prophet, Can a
«5« mother forget her children ? Though flic forget them, yet I will not
forget thee. If we be his children:thcn as a childe can not giue him-
felfc into the tuition of a ftranger ami foreine manjVnleifc he coplaine
either of the cruelty or poucrty of his fatherfo wc can not fccke fuc-
cours from elfe where than from htm alone, vnlclTe we reproch him
with pouerty and want of abihty , or with cruelty or to extreme rigo-
roufnclfc.
37 Neither
'^■^
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 371
37 Neither let vs alleage that wc arc worthily made fcarcful with
confciencc of finncs, which may make a Father be he neuer fo mer-
ciful! and kinde, daily to be difpleafed For if among men the fonnc
can with no better aduocate pieade his caufe to his fatlier,and by no
better meane get and rccouer his fauour bcmge loft,than if he him-
felfe humbly & lowly,3cknowledging his fault,do befech his fathers
mercy (for then the fatherly bowels can not hide thefelues but muft ^
he moucd at fuch prayers) what fliall that father of mercies do, and ""
the God of all comforieP.ihall not he rather heare the teares and
groninges of his children intrcatinge for themfelues(fpecially (ith he
dotli call and exhort vs to do fo) than any other interceffions Avhat-
foeuer they be:tothe fuccour whereof they do fo fearefully flee,not
without fome fhew of derpcire»becaufe they diftruli of the kindenes . .
and mercifulnes of their father i This ouerflowing plenty of fatherly
kindenes he depainteth and fetteth out vnto vs in the parable,whcre
the Father louingly embraceth the fonne that had eftranged himfclf tud e
from him,ihat had riotoufly wafted his fubftace,that had cuery way 20.
grieuoufly oft'cnded againfthim : andhetaricth not till he do with
words crauc pardon, but he himfelfe preucnteth him,knoweth him
a farre of reiurning,of his ownc wil goeth to meete him,comforteth
him and rcceiueth him into fauour, For,fetting out in a man this ex-
ample of fo great gentlencSjhc minded to teach vs how much more
plentifull kindenes we ought to looke for at his hand, who is not on-
ly a Father,but alfo the bcft and moft merciful of all Faih€is,howfo-
cuer we be vnkinde, rebellious, and naughty children ; fo that yet wc
caft our felues vpon his mercy. And that he might make it to be m ore
affuredly bcleued,that he is fuch a Father to vSiif we be Chriftias:he
willed not onely to be called Father,but alfo by expreffe name Our
father : as if we might thus talke with him , O Father which haft (o
great natural kindnes toward thy children,fo great cafines to pardon,
wc thy children call to thee and pray to thee,bcing affurcd and fully
perfwaded, that thou beareft no other affediontovs than fatherly,
howfoeuer we be vnworthy of fuch a Father. But becaufe the fmall
capacities of our heartc conceiuc nor fo great vnmcafurablcnefle of
fauour , not only Chrift is to vs a pledge and carncft of our adop^
tion^ but alfo he giueth vs the Spirit for witnefle of the fame adop- C«.4»<,
tion, through whomc we may with a free and lowdc voycc eric Ab -
ba. Father. So oft therefore as any delay fhall withftandc vs,letce vs
remember to aske of him , that corredingc our fcarefulneffe he will
fct before vs tk^i Sp^ritc of CQragioufoefe to be our^uidc tp praye
|>ol4cly,
4 AAA iij
Cap.2o, Of the maner howto receiuc
38 Whereas we arc not Co taughc that euery one (hould feucrally
call him his ownc father,but rather that we fhould al in common to-
gether call him Our Facher.thercby we are put in minde,how great
affedion of brotherly loue ought to be among vSjwhich arc altoge-
ther by one fame right of mercy and liberality jthc children of fuch a
Mat.aj. Father.Forwe all haue one common Fathcrjfrom whomecommeth
^" whaifocucr good thinge may betide vnto vs : there ought to be no-
thing leuerallamonge vs, which we are not ready with great chere-
fulnelfe of mmdc to communicate one to an other, fo much as nedc
requireth. Now if wc be fo dcfirous, as we ought to be, to reach our
hand & help one to in oiher,therc is nothing wherein we may more
profit our brethren, than to commende them to the care and proui*
dencc of the moft good Father,who being wel plcafed and fauoring,
nothing at al can be wanted. And verily cue this fame we owe to our
Fatht^.r.For as he thattruely & hartily loueth anyFather of houfhold,
dot!) alfo embrace his whole houfehold^with loue and izood wilhhke-
wifc what loue & sftedion wc beare to this heauely Father, we mud
ihcw toward his pcople,hi houfehold and his inhcritancc,which he
Bphc.i- hath fo honored , that he hath called a the fulnelfe of his onely be-
14. gotten Sonne. Lcttc a Chriftian man theieforc frame his prayers by
this rulc-jthat th*:ry be common,and may comprchende all them that
be brethren in Chrift with himrand not onely thofe whom he pre-
fently Teeth and knoweth to be fuch,but al men that hue vpon earth:
of whom,what God hath derermincd,it is out of our knowledge : fa-
uin^lhatiti^noieire p^odly thennarurall to wilh the be ft to them, Sc
hope the bell ofthem.Howbeit we ought with a certaine fingubr af-
fcd;on to beare a fpcciall inclination to them of the houfcholde of
Gala.5. faith, whom the Apoftle hath in euery thing peculiarly commended
*o. vnto vs. In a fummc, All our praicrs ought to be fo made, that they
haue lefpeift to that community which our Lorde hath ihbliihed in
his kingdom and his houfe.
59 Yet this witl.ftandeth not, bucthatwemay fpccially praye
both for our felues and for certaine other : fo that yet our minde de-
part not ^rom hauing an cic to this community, nor ones fvvarue fro
itjbut apply all things vnto it . For though they be Angularly fpokcn
in forme, yet bscaiife they are dircdcd to that marke, they ceaflc not
to be common All this may be eafily vnderftoode by a hke example.
The commaundemcnt of God is gcnerall,to rclieue the necdc of all
poorcand yet they obey this commaundcment which to this end do
helpe their pD"jerty whome they knoweor (ee to be in ncedc , al-
though they paffc oucr many whom they fee to be prcffcd with no
Icifc
^hc grace of Chriit. Lib.3. 372
kfffi'ficecflity: culierbecaufc chcy can nocknowe'all, or be not able
to helpc al. After this mancr rhey alfo do not agninU the wiLof God,
which hauing regard vmo and thinkingc vpon this common fellow-
(hip of the Churchjdo make fuch particular praicrs^.y.v/hicii they do
with a common minde in particular wordes,commcnde to God tlie-
felues or other, whofe neceflity God willed to be more neerely kno -
wen to them. Howcbeitallthinges arenothkeinpraierandinbe-
flawing of goods.For,the liberality of giuing can not be vfed but to-
ward them whofe ncedc we hauc percciued: but with praiers we may
hclpc cucn them that arc niofi ftrange and moft vnknowen to vs,by
howe great a fpace of grounde focuer they be diftant from vjs.This is
done by the general forme ot prater, whcrin all the children t)f God
arecaotaincd, among whom they alfo are.Hereto we may apply that , fi. t
which Paul exhorteth»thefaithfullof his time,that they liftTp cucry 8.
where pure handcs without ftrifc:becaufe when he wawierh thethat
firife ihutteth the gate againft praiers,he willeth the with oneimifide'
to lay their petitions in common together, / .11
.^o:*^; Itisadded,y he is in heauen.Wherupo it is not byandbyxo be
gathered that hcis bound faftenclofed & compaiTed with the circle
of heauen,as within ceriaine barres.For Salomon al(o confefTeth thac
the heaucns of heiuens cantiotcantaine him. And He himfelfie faith i.Kiffgs
by theProphet that heauen is his featej & the earth his footcttoQle* 8. 3-, '- '
Whcrby verily he fignifiethy he is;not limited in any certainecoaft, Eia.6^.
but is fprcd abroade throughout all thingcs. But becaufe our minde ^^'^ -
(Cuch is the ^roflenelTc of it J couldc not other wife conceiue hisvn-t 4^/2^7
fpcakeable glory jt is fignificd to vs by the heauen, than which there 14.
ca nothing come vnderour fight more ample or Juliet of maicfty.Sith
therfore wherfoeuer our fenfes comprehend any thingjthere they v(c
to fiftcn it;God is fetout of all place.thafwhcn we will feekc him we
fliondd be raifed vp aboue all ferife botli'of body and foule. Againe by
this maner of fpcaking he is li£ted vp'aboue all chaunce of corrupti6
&change:Hnally itt» fignified that be comprehendeth & containeth
the whole world U gouerneth it with his power.Wherefore this is al
•one as- if he had bin called of infinite grcatnes orhcight,of incoprer
henfiftle fubfiance, of vnmeafurablc pawer, of euerlafting immortali-i
ty.But while we baue this,we<muftiife vp our mindehier when God
isfpoken of>that we: dreame notany earthly or flefldy thipge.of hitrw
that we meafure him not by our finall p-roportions, nor draw hiswill
to the rule of our affcdions. And tlierqy/jthaUsto be raifed vpojir af-
fiance in hi n, by whofe prouidcnce andpbwerwe vnderftand heauen
&. cuth to b^ goucrncd. Let this be y fuqimcs that vnder cHq nmf
.u: AAA iiij
caule the word 6f God is like a kingly fcepccr,we arc here commaun-
«Jed to pray that he will fubdue the ftiindcs and hartcs of all men to
Willing obedience of it. Which is doncjwhcn with the fecrct infiintiit
of his Spirit he vctereth the efi'eduall force of his worde,that it may
be auaunced m fuch degree as it is worthy. Afterward we muft come
downc to the wicked which do obihnatly nnd with defpcrate rage
rcfiit his auihontic. God therefore fettcch vp his kingdome by hum-
Wing the whole world : but that in diuerfe maners: becaufe he ta-
meth the wantonneffcs of fomc, and of other fome he breakech the
vntamcd pridc.This is daily to be willied that it be done, that it may
pleafe God to gatherio himfclf c Chirchesout of all the coaftesof
the worldjto enlarge and encreafce them in number, to enrich them
with his giftes , to ftabhfli right order in them : on the other fide to
oucrthrowe all the enemies of pure doftrinc and rehgion,to fcattet
abrode their counfellsjio caft downe their cnterprifes. Whereby ap»
pearcth that the endcuor of daily preceding is not in vainc comaun*
ded vs : becaufe the tiiatters of men are ncuer info good cafe , that
filthinclTe being ihaken away and cleanfcd , full purcnelie fldriflicih
and is in hucly force. But the fulneflc of it is difterrcd vnto the bft
Cor. comming of Chnft , when Paulc teacheth that God (halbc all in alU
3**** And [o this prayer ought to withdrawe vs nom all the corrupt ons of
the world , which do feuer vs from God that his kingdome rtiould
not flonfh in vs, and alfo to kindle dur cndeuor to mortific the flefh,
finally to inftrud vs to the bearing of the croiTe : forafmuch as God
vill in this wife hauc his kingdome fprcd abrode. Neither ought we
to take it mifcontentedly that the outward man be dettroy ed> fo that
the inwardeman be rencwed.For this is the nature of the kingdome
of Godjwhert we fubmict our felues to the righteoufnelVc thcreof,to
iiiake vs partakers of his glorie. This is done when brightly fetting
fourth his light and truth with alway newe cncreafces , whereby the
darkenefle and lies of Satan and- his kingdome, may vanifh away, be
dcftroyedjsnd peri{h,hc dcfendeth them that be his, with the helpc
of his Spirit diredeth them to vprightncfTc and ftrengtheneth them
to continuance : but ouerthrowcth tlie wicked conspiracies of his
enemicsjfhakcth abrode their trcalcms aftd deceites, prcueteih their
mahce , and beareih downe their ftubbornncfle , till at length he kill
Antichrift with the Spirit of his mouth aiiddeftroytUvngodlincirc
with the brightneflc of his comming. i . - -^
4; The third petition is,Thatthc wHlof God be done in earth
a> it is in heauen. Which although it hagetH vpon his kingdome,and
can not be feucccdfiomitjiinotin.Yainc added fcucraliy,for,our
grofl*-»
- The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 574
grofTnefTejwhich d oth not cafily or by and by conceiuc what it is that
God rcigncinthe world.Itfliall therefore be no abfurditie if this be
taken by- way of plainer cxpolnion : that God iTiall then be kin« in
the world when all tilings fliall lubmut thcmfelues to his will. Nowe
here is not meant of his fccrcte\vill,wherby he gouerneih all things
and diredcth them lo their cndf.For though Satan & men are tiou-
blcfomly caried againit !iim,yct he can by his incoprchenfible coun-
feil not onely turnc alidc their violent motions , bdt alfo dnue them
into order that he may do by them that which he hath purpoied. But
here is fpoken of an other will of God, namtly thar,whereiinro
aunfwereth willing obedience : and therefore the heauen is byname
compared v/iih the earth : becaufe the Angells,as it is faid m the
Pfalme, do willingly obey God,& are diliizcnily bent to do hi? com- Pfa.io;
mnundements. We are therfore co'maunded to wifli that as in heaue io,
nothin<jj is done but by the becke of God, & the Angells are quietly
framed to all vprightnclfeifo the earthj^sll ftubbornnefTe & perucrfc-
neflc being q»ienched,may be fubied to fuch gouernemet. And when
we require this, we renounce the defires of our owne flefh; becaufc
Whofocuer doth not religne jnd yelde his aftections to God>ht doth
as much as in him lieth let himkiragainft himjforafmuch as nothing
Cometh out of vs but faulty. And we are againe by this prayer framed
to the forfdking of our feluesjthat God-may goucrne vs after his will: [
and not that onely, but that he may alfo crcat m vs newc mindcs and
newe hartds,our olde being brbu^iht to nought : that we may fcle in
our fclucs none other motion of dehVe than a mere confent with
his will : fummarily that ^e may will nothing of out leJues , but that
his Spirit may goucrne our har.tes , by whomc inwardly teachmg vs
we may learne to loucthofe things that pleafe him, and to hate thofe
things that difpleafc him. Whereupon this alfo followeth,that what*
foeuer aft'edions fight againft his wil , he may make them vaine and
voide. Loe here be the firft three thiefe pointes of this prayer , in
afking whereof wc ought to hauc the onely glorie of God before out
eyes, leauing the refped of our felues, and hauing no rcgardc to any
of our owne profit, which although it come hereof largely vnco vs,
yet wc ought not here to fekc it. But albeit all thefe things , though
we neither ihinke of thcm,nor wilh rhem , nor af kc theni, muft nc-
uerthcleflfe come to paffe intheirdue time, yetwe muft wi (he them
and require them. And this to do is no fmall profite for our trauaill,
that we may fb teftifie and profeffe our felues to be the feruantcs and
children of God, as much as in vs lieth cndcuonng and being trocly
and throughly geuentorec fourth his honor ^ which is due tohun
being both a Lorde anJ a Father. Who Co therefore do nocwith af.
fcftion and zele of auauncing the gloric of God,pray that the name
of God.be hallowed, chat his kingdome come,that his will be done;
they are not to be accomptcd among the children and feruames of
God : and as all thcfc things (halbe done againft their willcs, fo the/
ihallturne to their confu (ion and deihu^ion.
44 Nowc followeth the feconde part of the praycr,in which wc
come downe to oar owne commodities ; not that bidding farewell to
the glory of God (which as Paulc wiinclfethjis to be regarded cucn
in meate & drinke ) we (hould feke onely what is proHtable for our
fclues : but we hauc already gcucn warning that thcvc is this dtffc-
rence,that God peculiarly claiming three peiitions to himfelfe doth
drawe vs to himfelf wholly,thac he may in this wife proue our godli-
ncffc. Then he graunieth vs alfo to haue an eye to our owne com*
moditieSybut with this condition chat we afkc nothing for our feluef
but to this cndc that whatfoeuer benefits he beftowcth vpon vs.thcy
may (et foorth his gloryiforafmuch as nothing is more rightful than
that we hue and die to him. But in this pctiuon wc afkc of God ge-
nerally all tilings which the vfc of the body ncdeth Vndery dementi
of this world , not onely wherewith wc may be fed and clothed, but
alfo whatfoeuer he forefeeth to be profitable for vSjthat we may catc
our bred in peace. By which prayer brcfcly wc yclde our felucs into
his carc>and commit vs to his prouidchce,that he may fcedc^chcrifh,
and prefcruc vs. For the moft s»ood Father difdainetn not to receiue
alfp our body into his faithfull fauegardc and keping, to excrcifc our
Faith in thefc fmal things,when we loke for all thln^^s at his handes
cucntoacrumme of bred and a droppe of water. For whereas it is
come to pafl'e I wore not how.e by our iniquitie , that we be moued
tnd vexed with greater care of the flellie than of the fople : many
which dare truft to God for their foule,arc yei careful for their fleHi,
are yet indoute what thcyfhall cate , and wherewith iheyfhalbe
clothed : and if they haue not plenty of wine , whcatc > and oyle a«
forchandcjthcy tremble for feare.So much more do wc edeeme the
ihadowe of this life which lafteth but a momct,than that cuerlafting
immortalitic . But who fo iruftmge to God hauc ones caft away that
carcfulnelfe for the prouifion of the flcih,do alfo by and by loke for
faluation and euerlafting hfc at his hand»,which arc greater thins;s.Ic
is iherforeno fmal cxercife of Faith,to hope for thofe things of God,
which othcrwife do fo much holde vs in care:& wc haue not fmaliy
profited, when we haue put of thisvnbeleuingneffc which fticketh
uft witliin the bpxtcs almoQ qf all men . As for chat which fome dq
The grace ot Chrilt. Lib.3. 375
here tcache of tranfubftamiall bred , it ftmeth but fmally to agree
with the meaningc of Chrift : yea but if we did not cucn in this fraile
Jife gcuc to Gody office of anourifhing Father, our prayer (hould
be vnpcrfeft.The reafon which they bring is to much profane : that
it IS not mete that the children of God,which ought to be fpirituall,
{hould not onely caft their mindc to earthly cares , but alfo wrappc
God there in with them. As chough his bleffing and fatherly fauor
dorh not alfo appearc in the fu(tenance of our life , or as though it
were written in vainc that godhneffc hath promifes not onely of the
life to come, but alfo of this prefent life. But although the forgcuc« '-Tiro,
ncCTc of finnes is of much greater value than the fuftenances of the •
body , yet Chrift hath fetthe inferor thing in the firft place , to the
entent to lift vs vp by degrees to the other twoo petitions which do
properly belong to the heaucnly lifc,wherin he had regarde to our
groflTenelTe.Wc are commaunded to af kc Our bred, that we (hould
be contente with the quantitie which our heauenly Father vouche-
faucth to gcue to vs,and fliould not feke for gainc by vnlawfuil craf:y
nieancs. Inthemeanctimewemuftlearnethat it is made Ours by
title of gifte,bcc3ufc neither our diligenccnor our trauaill, nor our
handes (as it is fayed in Mofes) do by themfelues gett vs any thinp:, r-cti.n
vnlefTe the blcfling of God be prefentc : yea y plentic of bred fliould *^*
nothing at all profit vs , vnlcfle it were by God turned into nourifti-
mentc. And therefore this liberality of God is no lelTe ncceffarie for
the riche than for the poore : becaufe hauing their cellcrs and their
bames full,they (hould yet fainte for drinefTe and emptinefTe, vnleflc
they did by his grace cnioy their brcd.The word This day,or Eucry
day as it is in the other Euangelilt , and alfo the adicAiue Daily , do
bridle the to much gredincs of fraile ihings,whercwith we arc wont
to burnc out of meafurCjand wherunto arc ioined other cuclls : (ith
if we hauc plentifull abundance, we do glorioufly poure it out vppon
plcafure,deiites,boafting,and other kindes of riotous excclTcThcr-
fore we are commaunded to af ke onely (b much as is enough for our
iiecc(fity,and as it were from day to day,with this affiance that when
our heauenly Father hath fed r$ this day , he will alfo not faile vs to
morrowc.Thereforc howe great plentie of thingcs fo eucr do flowc
vnto vs , yea when our barnes be fluffed and our cellcrs full :yec we
ought alway to af kc our daily bred:becaufe we muft certainly belcuc
that all fubflance is nothing , but in fomuch as the Lordc doth by
pouring out of his ble(fingc with continuall encrealc make it frutt-
full : and that the very fame fubftnnce that is in our hand , is not out
owne , buc infgmuch as he dpth eucty houie geuc r$ a portion and
Cap.2o. Of the maner how to receiuc
grauntvs thevfc of ir. This wlierens the pride of men doth mod
hardly fuffcr it fclfe to he pcrfuadcdrthc Loide tcftiHeth that he haih
lliewcd a lingular example thercoffor all ages,when he fed his peo-
ple with Manna in tlicwiideintlle , to teachcvs that man liuethnoc
?3ct.5. i'^ t)rccl oncly.but rather m the vvorde that comcth our of his mouth.
Whereby is declrired,th.it it is his power alone by which our life and
ftren^tbcs are fufleined.akhoueh he do minifter it vnto vs vnder bo-
dily iniirumcntcs. As he is wont alfo totcachcvs by theconrrarie
euiC. ex.imple, when he Co oft as he will,brcaketh the ftrengch and(as he
6- callcth it) the ftatf of bred , that men eating may pine with hunger,
and drinking may be dried vp with thirft. But whofo not being con-
tented with daily bred , but with vnbrindeled gredineffc arc gaping
for cndlelTe llore , or whofo being full with their aboundance , and
carcleflc by reafon of the heape of ihcir richelTe, do neucrtheUfl«
fuc to God with this prayer , they do nothing ells but mockc him,
For,y firft (one of fuch men af kc that which ihey would not obteinc,
yea that which they moftof allabhorre,ihat is, tohauconely daily
bred, Si. (o much as in them lieth they dtfiemblingly hide from God
the affcdion of their couetoufneflTe : whereas true prayer oughte to
poure out before him the very whole minde it felfe , and whatfoeuer
inwardly heth hidiien. But the other fort do afke that which they
loke not for at his hande , namely that whicji they thmke that they
haue with themfelues.ln this that it is called Oures y bountifulnefi'c
of God ( as we haue faid) Co much more appeareth , which makcih
that oures that is by no right due to vs. Yet that cxpo{ition is not to
be reicded which 1 haiic alfo touched, that by our bred ismeanrc
that which is earned with rightfull and harmcleire trauaill , and not
gocic with deceites & extorcions:bec3ufe that is alway Oiher mens
which we get to our felucs with any ill doing. Whereas we pray that
itbe geuen vs, thereby is fignified that it is the onely and fre gitte of
God/rom whenfefoeucr it come to vs , yea when it (hall mollof all
feemc robe gotten by ourownc policic and trauaill , and earned
with our owne handes : forafmuch as it cometh to palVe by his onely
'blciling,that our labours profper well.
45 Nowefolloweth , Forgcue vs our dettes : in which petition
and the ncxte fol!owinge,Chrift hath brcfdy contcined whatfoeuer
makcih for the hcauenly life ; as in thcfe twoo partes aboue ftandcth
(cre.^t.^liefpjr'tu^l^couenant which GOD hath made for the faluatioa
n . and of his Chirchjl will write my la wes in their hartes,and I will be mer-
JJ-^* cyftill ro their iniquitie. Here Chrift bcL'inncththeforgeucneireof
iuiiies : after ih:$ . he will by and by adioinc the fecon Jc sracc, that
God
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 37^
God defend vs with the power of his Spirit, and fuftainc vs with hi»
heJpe , that we may ftandc vnoucrcome ay;amft all tcncations. And
iinncs he calleth dcttes,bccaufe we are detbounde to pay the penalty
of them, and were by no mcanes able to fatisfie it , vnltflc we were
acquited by this forgeucnefie. Which pardon is of his free mercic,
when he himfclfe liberally wipeth out thefe dcttes, taking no pai»r>ct
of vs, but with his owne mcrcie fatisfying himfelfc in Chrilt , which Rom,},
hath ones geucn himfclfe for recompcnfe . Therefore whofo truft *^
that God fhalbc fatisfied by their owne or other mrnncs meritc$,aiKl
that with fuch fatisfadios the forgeueneffe of finnes is rccompcnic4
and rcdemcdjthey haue no parte of communicstingofthis free for-
giucnctfe:& when they call vpon G O D in this mancr, they do no-
thing but fubfcribc to their owne accufationjVca & feale their owne
condemnation with their own witncfTe.For they confeflc tHemfclues
detters.vnlefle they be acquitcd by the benefit of forgeucncflTejwhich
yet they do not receiue,but rather refufe, whe they thruft vnto God
their owne merites and fatisfadions. For, i'o they do not bcfcch his
mcrcie,but do appeale to his iudgemcnt. As for them that dr.eame of
a perfedio in themfelues,which takeih away neede to craue pardo,
let them haue fuch difciples whom the itching of their eares driueth
to errors : fo that it be certaine that fo many difciples as they ^cf,arc
taken away from Chrift : forafmuch as he mftruifting ail to confeflc
their giltinelTcrecciucth none but finners:not for that be cberi/heth
finnes with flatterings , but becaufc he kncwe that the faithfull arc
neuer throughly vnclothed of the vices of their flefli , but chat they
alway remaine fubie<S to the iudgemcnt of God. It is in dcedc to be
willied, yea & to be carneftly endeuorcd, that wc hauing performed
all the partes of our dutic may truely reioife before God that we arc
cleane from allfpott.'but foraltruch as it pleafeth God by litlc & litle
to make againe his image in vSjihat there alway remaineth fome in-
fcdion in our flefh, the re medic ought not to haue bene dcfpifed. If
Chrift by the authoritie geucn to him of his Fathcr,cQmaundeih n
throughout the whole courfe of our life, to flee to crauing of pardo
of our giltinefTcrwho ftialbe able to fufFcr thcfe newe maifters, which
go about with this imagined ghoft of perfed innocecie to dafcll the
eyes of the fimplcjtoroake them to truft that they may be made free
from all fault? Which,a$ lohn witncffethjis nothing cUs but to make t.ToIm,
Godalier.And withall one worke thcfe lewde men by cacilUng one »o.
article do tearc in fonder & by th<it meanc do weaken from the very
foundation v whole couenac of God.vvherin we haue (Kewcd that ouc
ijlaation is c6:cincd: Co as they be noc.only robbers of God^bccaufe
Cap.2o. Of the maner how to recciuc
they feuer thofe things fo conjoined , but alfo wicked ami cruell be-
. caufc ihcy oueiwhclme poorcfoulcs with defpeire : and traitors to
themfelues & othcr,that be like themjbecauft they bring thcmUlucs
into a flouthfulncflc diredly contrary to the mercy of God. But
whereas fomc obieif^jthat in wifhing the coming of the kingdome of
God, we do alfo af ke the putting away of finne : that is to childilli,
bccaufe in the firft table of this prayer is fet forth vnto vs moft hie
perfedion, but in this part is fet forth our weakeneffe. So thefc twoo
things do Httly agree together, that in a fpring toward the markc wc
defpifcnot the remedies which our neceflitie requireth. Finally we
pray that we may be forgeue as we our fclucs do forgeuc our dettors,
ihatis,aswedoforgeuc and pardon all ofwhomefoeucr wchaue
bene in any thing offended , either vniuftly handled in decde , or re*
prochcfully vCcd in word. Not that it lieth in vs to pardon the gilti-
nclfc of the fault and ofFenfe , which perteineth to God alone : but
this is our forgcuing, of our owne willingncfTc to lay away out of our
mindc wrathjhatrcd, and defire of reuengement,and with voluntary
gfj ,, forgetfulneffc to treadc vnder fote the remembrance of iniuries.
aj>. Wherefore we may not afke forgeueneffe of finncs at the handc of
Godjif we do not alfo forgeue their offcnfes towarde vs which either
do or ftauc done vs wrong.But if we kepc any hatreds in our hartes*
and purpofc any reuengemcntesand imagine by what occafion w€
may hurt , yea and if we do not endeuor to come mio fauor againe
with our enemies, & to deferue well of them with all kinde of frendly
doings 9 and to winne them vnto vs : we do by this prayer befcchc
God that he do not forgeue vs. For we require that he graunt to vs
the fame forgeucncffe which we graunt to other. But this is to pray
that he sraunt it not to vs,vnlcffe we graunt it to them. Whofo thcr-
forc be (uch,what do they obtein by their prayer but a more greuous
iudgemcnt.^Laft of all it is to be noted,that this codition that he for-
geuc v« as wc forgeue our dettors, is not herefore added for that wc
deferue his forgeUenefle by the fbrgeuencffe which we graunt to
other,as if that caufeof forgeueneffe to vs were there exprcffcd.-but
by this worde partly the Lordes will was to comforte the wcakeneiTc
of our Faith, for he added this as a figne whereby we may be aflured
that he hath as furely graunted to vs forgcuenefle of our finnes,as wc
furcly knowe in our confciencc that we haue graunted the fame to
other, if our minde be voide and cleanfed of all h.ltred, enuic and re-
' uengemenr,and partly by this as it were by a markc,he wipcth them
out of the number of his children that they may not be bolde to call
vpon himartheir Father, which being hcdlong hafty to reucnge, and
hardily
\
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 377
hardily entreated lo paidon, do vfc ftiffiy continuing enmilies,and do
chcrifh in themfelues the fame difplcafure tovvardc other which they
pray to be turned from themfelues. Which is alfo in Luke exprcfly
fpoken in the wordcs of Chrift.
46 The fixt petition (as wc hauc' faid^ aunfwercth to the pro-
mife of engrauing the lawc of God in our hartes.Butbecaufe we do
not without continuall warrefare and hard and great ftriumgs obey
to God , we do here pray to be furnifhed with fuch wepons and de-
fended with fuch fuccor , that we may be able to get the vidorie:
whereby we are warned thatwcftande mnecdenot onely of the
grace of the Spirit,which may foften> bowe,and dired our hartcs to
the obedience of God, but alfo of his helpe, whereby he may make
vs vnuinciblc againft both all the traiterous entrappinges and violent
conflides of Satan.But now of tcntations there are many and diuerfc
Ibi tes. For , both the pcruerfe thoughies of minde prouoking vs to lam. i.
trefpafilng againft the Iawc,vvhich cither our ownc luft doth minifler ^-^ ^4<
vnto vSjOr the deuell ftirreth vp,arc tentatios : and alfo thofe things ^ ^ ^ j '^'
which of their owne nature are notcuell,yet by the craft of the
deuell are made tentations,when they are fo fet before our eyes,thac
by the occafio of them we be drawen away or do fwarue from God.
And thefetentations are cither on the right hande or on the left.
On the right hand,asrichcire5power, honors, which commonly do a.Thcf
with their glittering and fliewc of good fo dafell the fight of men, hS*
and catchc them with the baited hoke of their flattcrings,that being
entrapped with fuch deceitcs,or droonke with fuch fwetenefie, rhey
may forget their God. On the left hande , as poucrtie , reproches,
defpifingcs , troubles , and fuch other : that they being greued with
the bitternefte and hardnefTe thereof may be vtterly difcouragcd,
caft away faiih and hope , and finally be altogether eftranged from
God. To thefe tcntations of both fortes , which fight with vs either
being kindled in vs by our owne luft , or being fet againft vs by the
craft of Satan , we pray to our heauenly Father that he fufFer vs not
to yelcie.But rather that he vpholdc#s and raifc vs vp with his hande, ''^
that being ftrong by his ftrength , we may ftande faft againft all the
aflaultcs of the malicious enemie , whaifocucr thoughtes he put into
our minde : then , that whatfoeuer is fet before vs on either fide , wc
may turne it to good, that wc neither be puffed vp with profperitie,
nor throwen downc with aduerfi'ie. Neither yet do we here require
that wc may felc no tcntati5s at all, with which we hauc great neede
fo be ftirrcd vp,pricked,& pinchcd,Ieaft by to much refte we giowc pf^ ^g^
dulLFornotm vaine did Dauid wiftic to be tempted:& npt without 2.
Cap.2o. Ofthemaherhowtorccciue
Gcn.a2 cau(e the Lordc daily temptcth his cledc, chalhfing chem by flTiamff,
[L* J. poueniCstrouble,anci other kindcs of crofl'e.But God lemptcth after
» & 1 J ^^^ rnancr and Satan afrei" an other : Satan, to dcftroy, damne^ con*
jl founde and tbrowe downe hedlong : but God, that by prouing them
that be his he may haue a tnall of their vnfainedngffe,and by exerci-
fing them may confirme their flrength,io moriific purge by ficr, and
feare their flelh , which vtilt (Te it were in this wife reflrained , would
t.Cor* waxe v/amorj and would wildly outrage aboue mcafure. Moreoucr
*o*3' Satan afl'afleth men vnarmedand vnredy,that he may oppreflTc them
vnware : God euen with tepting workcth the etfede,ihat they which
be his may pacicntly beare whatfoeuer he fendeth vpon them. By
the name of the Euell, whether we vnderft.mde the Deuell or flnne,
s.Pct.i it makcth litle matter. Satan in dccdc himfelf is the enemy that lieth
^' in waite for our life : but with finne he is armed to deftroy vs. This
L *^'>* therefore is our requeft^that we may not be ouercome or oucrwhel-
med with any tentations ,bi)t may by the power of the Lorde ftande
ftrong againft all contrary powers wherewith we are affailed : which
is,not to yelde vs vanquiihed to tentations, that being receiued into
his kcping and charge,& being fafe by his protcdion we may endure
vnouercome ouer finne,death,thc gates ot htl,ind the whole king-
dome of the deuill : which is to be deliuercd from euell. Where it is
alfo to be diligently marked , that it is aboue our ftrength to matchc
with the deu^ll Co great a warrier, and to beare his force and violecc.
Other\vife we (hould but vairtely or as it were in mockage al kc that
which we had alil^ady in our fsloes. Surely ,they which prepare them
to fuch a battell with truft of themfclues , do not fufficicndy vndcr-
ftande with howe herce and well armed an enemy they hauc to do.
Nov/e we pray to be deliucred from his power , as out of the mouth
of a mad & raging Lyon , whereas we Ihould be torne in peeces with
Pfa.tfo. his teeth and pawe«,and fwallowed with his throtc,vnlcfle the Lorde
*■♦• do deliuer vs out of the middeft of death : yet thercwithall knowing
this that if the Lordc ("hail (tande by vs,and fight for vs when we arc
ouerthrowen, we (hall in his {ti^igthlTiewe ftrength. Let otl^cr truft
as they lift to their owne abilities and ftrcngthcs of free will , which
they thinke thacrhey haue of themfelues : but let it fufficc vs that we
ftand and arc ftrong by the onely llrength of God. But this prayer
contcineth more than at the firrt fight it bearcth in (hewe.For if the
Spirit of God be our Ihengti to fieht out our combate with Satan,
*Vc (hall not be able to get the vidoric vntill we being filled with
that Spiritlliall hauc put of all the weakcnelfe of ourflclh. When
ihcrforc we pray to be dchuered from Satan and the Deuell,wc pray
to
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 578
to bcc from time to time enriched with newe cncreafes of the grace
of God , till being fully ftiiffed with them we may triumph oucr all
cucll. It femeth hard and rouoh to feme, that we craue ot God that
he Icade vs not into tcntation , forafmuch as it is contrajy to his na-
ture to tempt, as lames witncfTeth. But this qneftion is already partly
aflbiledjwhere wc faid that outowne luft is properly the cauie of ail
the tentations wherewith we are ouercomej and therefore worthily
bereth the blame therof.Ncither doth lames meane any thing ells, lames,
but that the faultes are without caufe & wrongfully layed vpon God, »•» 3«
which we are driuen to impute to our felues , becaufe we knov/e our
Tclues inourconfciencegilty of them. But this withftandeih no: but
that Goxl may when it pleafeth him make vs bonde to Satan , caft vs
away into a reprobate fcnfe, and to hlrhy Kilies , and \o h adc vs into
tcntation by his iudgemec whjch ii righteous in dccdc but yet often-
times fecret: forafmuch as the caufe of it is ofttn hiddc from men,
which IS yec certaineljf knowen with him. Whereupon is gathered
that this is no vnfit maner of fpeaking , if we be perluaded that he
doth not without caufe fo oft threaten , that when the reprobate
{halbc ftriken with blindncllc and hardening of hai te , ihefe fhalbc
fure tokens of his vengeance.
47 Thele three pctitions,wherewith wc do peculiarly comcnde
vs and our things to God,do euidently fliewe this which wc hauc be-
fore faid, that the prayers of Chriftians ought to be common and to
tend to the common edifying of the Chirch , and to the encrcafe of
the communion of the faithfulf. For there doth not euery man pray
to haue art|^ thing priuatly geuen,buc all in common together do pray
for Our bred,for forgeuenefle of finncSjthat wc may not be led into
tentafion,that we may be deliuered from cuill. There is furthermore
adioined a caufe wh/we hauc both fo great boldnefle to ai ke , and
fo great truft to obtcine: which although it be not in y larine copies,
yet it agreeth more fitly in this place tha that it {hould feeme worthy
to be omitted, namely that his is the kingdome , and the power and
the glorie for euer. This is the perfed and quiet refl of our foulc. For
if our prayers were to be commended to God by their owne worthi-
nelTcjVvho fhould be fo bolde,as ones to open his mouth before him?
NowcTiowfoeuer we be mort miferablcjhowfoeuer moftvji worthy
of all mcn,howfoeuer voide of all commcndation-.yet wc (hall neuer
want caufe to pray,& neuer be dc-ftitute of confidence :forafmuch as '
our father can not haue his kingdome,power, and gloric taken away
from him. At the cnde is added Amen, whereby is exprcfled our fcr-
uentnclTe of dcliic to obicinc thofc things that wc haue af kcd of
BOB ij
Cap'.2 o. Of the maner how to rcceiue
God, and our hope is confirmed that all fuch things are already ob*
teincd and fliall furely be gene vs becaufe they arc promifed of God,
which can not deceiue. And this agrecth with that mancr of prayer
which wehaueherc before rehear feet. Do it Lorde for ihy names
fake, not for our fakes or our righteoufnefle : whereby the holy ones
do not only exprefl'e the ende of their praiers, but alfo confeflc that
they are vnworthy to obteinc vnlefle God fetch the caufc from him-
felf,and that their truft to fpcdc cometh of the onely nature of God*
Iat,i7. ^^ Thus haue we whatfoeucr we ought yea or in any wife may
* afke of God, fet foorth m this forme and as it were a rule of praying
taught by the beft fcholemaifter Chrift , whome the Lorde hath fee
ouer vs to be our teacher,& whom alone he hath willed to be harke-
fj.ii. ned vnto. For he both alway hath bene his eternall wifedome ,and
being made man is geuen to men the Angell of great counfell. And
this prayer is in pU pointes/o fully perfcd, that whatfocuer foreync
or fu age thing is added which can not be re%rred to it,it is vngodly
ee Au- and vnworthy to be allowed of God. For in this fumme he haih fet
uitine. forth,what is mete for him.what is pleafing to him,what is necclTaiy
. jQ ^ for vSjHnally what he will grnunr. Wherefore who (b dare go further,
roba. and to afke any thinc^ of God befide thcfe , firft ihcy will addc of
their ownc to the wifdome of God (which can not be done without
mad blafphemie) then they holde not themfclues vndcr tbc will of
God, but defpitingii do with gredinelTc wander further : finally they
ill all neuer obtsinc any thing,forafmuch as they pray without faith.
And there is no dout that all fuch plrayers are made without faith,
becaufe here wanteth the woord of God , vpon which vMefic faith
be grounded, it can in no wife ftande. But they which forfaking the
maimers rulc,do foUowc their ownc defires, arc not only without tnc
•cfuga word of God, but alfo fo much as they be able with their whole en-
]^^"' dcuor.are againil it. Thcrfore Tertullian no lefl'e fitly than truly bath
called this a lawcfuU prayer, fccrctely fignfying that all other arc
lavvelefft' and vnlawefull.
49 We would not banc tbcfe things fo taktn as though we werei
fo bound with ckis forme of praycr,that wc may not change a word
or a fill.ible.For there are cchcwhere red many prayers in the Scrip-
tures , farre differing from rhis in woordes , yet written by tm fame
Spiritjsnd which are at this day profitable to be vfed of vs. Many arc
3 cominucilly put into the mouthes of the faithfuU by the fame Spirit,
which in likcnefle of wordes do not fo much agree.This onely is our
meaning in fo teach!ng,that no man (hould feke,loke for,or afke any
other thing at all than that which is fummanly comprehcded in this
prayer.
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 37^
prayer , and which though it moft difter in worues yet differeth noc
in fcnfe. Like as it'is certainc that all the prayers which are found in
the Scripturcs,and which do come out ot godly hartes, arc applied to
tbis/o verily none can any where be found, which may match,much
lefTe pafle,the perfedneflb of this prayer. Here is nothing left out,
that might be thougljtvpon tothcpraifes of God , nothing that
ought to come into the minde of man for his owne profites : and the
fame (o fully that all hope is worthily taken away from all men to
attempt to make any bettcr.In a lumme, let vs rcmcmbrc that this is
thcdodrme of the wifcdomc of God, which hath taught what he
willedjsnd willed what was needefull,
50 B ut ahhough we haue aboue fayedjthat we ought alway to
breath vpwarde with minds lifted vp to Godj& pray without ccaffing:
yet foralmuch as fuch is our weakencflfcjas needeth to bee vpholden
with many helpcs: fuch isour duUeneflc, as needeth to be pricked
forwarde with many fpurres : it is good that euery one of vs appomt
to himfelf priuately certaine hourcs which may not paffe away with-
out prayerjand which may haUc the whole alfedionsofourmindc
throughly bi;fied to that purpofetas, when we rife in the morning,
before that we go to our dayes worke, v/hen we fitt downe to meate,
when we haue bene fedde by the blcfling of God , when we take vs
to reft. Onely let this not be a fuperftitious obferuing of houres , by
which,as paymg a tafke to God,we may think our felues difcharged
for the other hourestbut attaining of our weakenes,wherby it may
fo be exercifed and from time to time ftirred vp^ Specially we ought
carefully to loke that fo oft as either we our felues are in diftreffejor
we fc other to be in diftreffe with any hardneffe of aduerfitic , wc
runne ftreight way to him,not with feete but with hartes : then, that
we fufFer not any profperitie of our owne or other mens, to paffe but
that we teftifie that we acknoweledge it to bee his with praifc and
thankefgeuing.Finally,this is dili£.etly to bee obferucd in all prayer,
that we go not about to binde God to certaine circumftanccs,nor to
appoint to him> what he fhall do, at what time,in what place, and in
what mancrras by this prayer we are taught to make to him no lawe,
nor to appoint to him any condition , but to leaue to his will that
thofe things which he will do, he may do in what jnaner, at what
time,ahd in what place it plcafeth him. Whereforecre we make any
prayer for our felues,we firft pray that his will be done : where we do
already fubmitt our will to his: with which when it is reftraincd as
with a bridle put vppon it, it may not prcfumc to bring Godil^tO
rulcjbut make him the iudgc and goucrnor of all her defires,
hhn ii;
Cap.2o. Of the nianer how to receiue
51 If we 60 with mindes framed co this obediece/uflFer our ftlucs
to be ruled with the lavves of Gods Prouidece, we fhall eafily karnc
to continue in prayerjand with longing delires paciently to waite for
the Lord:being alfured that ahhough he appeare nor,yet he is alway
prefenc with vs, and will when he feeth his time declare howe not
deafte eares he gauc to the prayers, which in the eyes of men femed
to be defpifed. And this (halbc a moft prclent comfort, that we faint
not and fall downe by defpaire>ifatany time God donotaunfwerc
at our firll requcftes. Like as they are wont 10 do, which while they
are caried with their fodeine heate , do fo call vpon God, that if he
come not to them at their fii ft bruntes & bring them prefent helpe,
they by and by imagine him to be angry and hatefully bent againft
them , and cafting away all hope of obtcining do cefle to call vpon
him. But rather difterring our hope with a well tempered cuennefTe
of minde , let vs go forwarde in that perfeuerance which is fo much
commended to vs in Scriptures. For in the Pfalmes we may often-
times fee ho'.ve Dauid and other faithfull mcn,whcn they feeme in a
mancr wcricd with praying , did beate the aire , bccaufe they threwc
av/ay their words to God that heard them not, & yet they cefle not
from praying : hecaufe the word of God hath not his full authoritie
mainteincdjVnleflTc the credite thereof bee fet aboue all fucccflcs of
things.Moreoucr let vs not tcmpte God and prouoke him againft v$
beirige weried with our importunacie , which many vfe to do, which
•doe nothing but indent with God vpon a certain^ condition, and
binde him to the lawes of their couenanting as ihoudi he were
feruant to their defires : which if he doe not prefently obey ,thcy
difdaine , they chafe , tliey carpe againft him , they murmurc , they
turmoile. Therefore to fuch oftentimes in his furor he being angry
graunteth that , which to other in his mercie he being fauorabic
rira.n denieth. An example hereof arc the children of Ilraell , for whome
'* it had bene better not to haue bene heard of the Lordc, than with
flefti to eatc vp his wrath.
51 But if yet at length after longloking for itourfenfe do not
perceiue what we haite preuailed with praying , and feleth no fruitc
thereof : yet our faith (hall afl'ure vs of d)3t , which can not be per-
cciucd by fcnfi5,namely that we haue obteincd that which was expe-
dient for vs , forafmuch as the Lorde doth fo of te and Co certainly
take vpon him that he will haue care of our greues , after that they
haue bene ones laide in his bofome. And fo he v/ill make vs to poflTeflc
aboundance irt poucrtie , comfort in afflidion. For howfoeucr all
other things do failc vs, yet God will neuer failc vs , which fuffereth
the
The grace of Chrift. Lib.5. 580
Ac waiting and patience of them tiiac be his to be ciifappointed. He
alone (hall fuffice vsinftecdeof all thingSjforafcuchas hecontci-
ncth in himfelfe all good things,which he (hall one day difclofe vnto ,
vs at the day of ludgcmcnc when he fhall plamely fliewcfonh his
kingdome. Befide this although God graiint to vs , yet he doth not
alway aunfwcr according to the exprefl'c forme of our requcft , but
holding vs after outwarde fecminge in rufpcnfe, yet by a meane vn-.
knowe he fliewcth that our prayers were not wain. This is meant by
the wordes of Tohn , If we knowe that he hcareth vs when we af ke
any thing of him,we know thlt we hauc the petitions which we af kc * '^ohii,
of him. This feemeth a weake fuperfluoufncire of wordes : but it is '**5'
a (ingularly profitable declaration , namely that God eucn when he
doth not follow our dofires,is yet gentle & fauorable to our prayers,
that the hope which refteth vpon his worde may neucr difappoint
vs. But with this patience the faithfulldofofarre neede to be fu-
ftcincd J that they fhould not long ftand vnlefTe they did ftay vpoti
it. For the Lordedoihby not light trialles proue them that be his,
and not tenderly doth cxercife them : but oftentimes driueth them
into the greatcft extremities , and when they are driuen thether he
fu6frcih them long to fticke faft in the mire , ere he geue them any.
paft of his fwetcncHe : and , as Hanna faith,he l]ayeth,and quckneih: i sam,
hcleadcth downc to the helles , and bringcth backc againe. What ».tf.
coulde they here do but be difcouraged, and fall hcdlonge into
defpairc : vnlc(rc when they arc in difirelTe and defolate and already
halfw' dead, this thought did raife them vpjthat God dothloke vpon
them, and that there Ihall be athande anende of their eucls?Bue
howcfoeuer they ftande faft vppon the alTurednefTe of that hope,
they ceafle not in the meane time to pray : becaufe if there be not itt
prayer a ftedfaftnefle of f ontinuauce , wc nothing preuajle with
praying.
The xxj. Chapter.
of the eternali EUStion , whereby Ged bath predeflmatefime U
faluation , and other fome to deJirM&ior$,
Vt nowe whereas the couenant of life is not cgally preachedi
to all men,and with them to whome it is preached it doth not
either egally or continually finde like place:in this diucr(itic the
wonderous deapth of the ludgcmeni of Godappeareth. For
neither is it any dout but that this diuerfitie alfo feruc.th the free
i;iiQire of Oods ctcrnallelcdioii.If it be cuident that it is wrought by
BBB iiij
B
Cap.2i. Of the mancr howtoreceiue
the will of God that faluation is frcly offred to rome,and other Come
are debarred from coming to it;here by and by arife great and hard
quettions which can not other wife bedifculfcd, thanif the godly
mmdcs haue that certainly ftablillied which they ought to holdc
concerning eledion and Predeftination. This is (as many thinke) a
comberfomequeftioibecaufe they thinke nothing to, be IcfTe realb-
nable tha of the comon multitude of men fome to be toreordeined
to raluatio,other fome to deftrudion.But howe they wrongfully en-
combre thcmfelueSjfhaU afterwarde be euidet by the framing of the
i matter together.Belide that in y very fame darknelTe which makcth
men afraide , not oncly the prdfitableneife of this do<^rine but alfo
the moft fwete fruice fhcweth forth it felfe.Wc fhallneuer be clercly
perfuaded as we ought to be , that our faluation floweth out of the
fountainc of the free mercy of God,till his eternall cledio be knowe
to v$, which by this comparifon brightly fetteth forth the grace of
God, that he doth not without difference adopt all into the hope of
faluation,but geueth to fome that which he denieth toother. Howe
much the ignorace of this principle diminitheth of the glcry of God,
howe much it withdrawcth from true humiliticit is phine to fee.But
Paule denieth that that which is fo nccefiary to be knowe,is poffiblc
to be knowen, vnleflTe God leauing alltogcther the refped of workes
do chafe them whom Ive hath determined with himfelf In this time
(uith he) theremnantes were faued according to free elcdion.lf by
Grace , then not of workes : forafmuch as Grace ihould then not be
am.n grace. If of workes $ then notoFGrace ; forafmuch as worke (hould
nowe not be workc . If we mutt be broudu backe to the beginning
of eledion, that it may be certaine that (aluation cometh to vs from
no otherwhere than fro the mere liberahne of God: they which will
hauc this principle quenched, do niggardly fo much as in tlicm lieth
darken that which ought glorioufly & with full mouth to haue bene
publyHied , and they plucke vp the very roote of humihtie. Paule,
where the faluacion of the remnant of the. people is afcribcd to free
eledion,clerely telhfieth that onely then it is knowen that God
doth by his mere good pleafure fauc whom he will , and not render
rewarde which can not be done. They which fhutt the gates, that
hone may be bolde to come to the tafting of this dodrine,do no IclTc
wrong to men than to God : becaufe neither fliall any other thing
fafficc to huble vs as we ought to be,neither fhall we otherwife feelc
from our hart how much we are bodde to God. Neither yet is there
any otherwhere the vpholding ftay of founde affiace,as Chrift him-
felfc teachcth,which to dehucr vs from all feare,& to make vs vnua^
quifhable
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 381
quifliablc among lo many clangers, ambuflies, & deadly battels,pro-
mifcch y whatfoeuei he hath receiucd of his Father to kepe, Ihali be loh. lo
fafc.Whercof we gather that they (hal with continuall trembling be *5*
iJiiferable , whofocuer they be that knowe not themfclucs to be the
proper poflelTion ot God.-and therefore that they do very ill prouidc
both for thcmlelues & for all the faith full, which in beinge blindc at
ihefe three profits which we haue touched, would wifh y whole fun-
dation of our faluation to be quite taken from among vs. Moreouer
hereby the Church appcareth vmo vs,which otherwife ( as Bernard Serin
rightly teachcth) were not pollible to be founde,nor to be knowen a- Cat«7i,
mong crcatureszbecaufe both waits in maruelous wife it hcth hidden
within the bofomc oi blefled prcdeftination , and within the Maffc
of miferablc damnation. But ere I entrc into the matter it fclf,I muft
before hande in two fortes fpeake to^o fortes of mcn.That the en-
treating of predcftfnation,whereas of it felfc it is fomewhat combcr-
fomcjis made very dqptfull yea and dangerousjthe curioufncs of men
is the caufe : which can by n4Poppes be reftrained from wandringc
into forbidden compafTes , and climbing vp an hie : which , if it may,
wil leaue to God no fccrete which it will not fearchc and turne oucr.
Into this bold eneile and importunacie forafmuchas we commonly
fee many to runne headlong,and among thofe fome that are other-
wife not cuiU men : here is 6c occalion to warne them what is in this
behalfe the due meafute of their dut)||f irft thcrfore let them reme-
bei jthat when they enquire vpon Predeftinati6,thcy pearce into the
fecret dofcts of the wifdom of God:wherinto if any man do carelefiy
and boldly breake in, he ihall both not attaine wherewith to fatisfic
his cunoufnefTcand he ftiall entre into a raafc whereof he fhall findc
no way to get out againc.For neither is it meete that man (hould frc-
\y fearch thofe things which God hath willed to be hidden in himfclf,
and to turne ouer from very eternity the height of wifdom,which he
willed to be honored & not be conceiued , that by it alfo he moughc
be maruelous vnto vs.Thofe fccretcs of his will which he hath deter-
mined to be opened vnto vs,he hath difclofcd in his word:& he hath
determined,fo farre as he forefaw to pertainc to vs and to be profita-
ble for vs.
X We arc comc(faith Auguilinc)into y way of Faith, let vs fted-
faftly holde it.It brmgeth into the Kinges chamber, in which all the ,^°™h
trcaiures of knowledge and wifdom are hidden.For, the Lorde hint* 35,
felfe Chrift did not cnuy his excellent & moft chofen difciplcs,v/hcn lohn, 8,
he faid, I haue niany thingcs to be faid to you , but ye can not bcare **•
them now. Wc muft walke^wc aiuft profit,wc muft cncreafe^chat our
Cap.2i, Of themanerhowto receiuc
hartcs may be able to conceiue thofe thingcs which now we can not
conctiue.If thelaft daysfinde vs profitinge,therc wcfhall learne that
which here we could not. If this thought be offeree with vs,that the
word of the Lord is the only way, that may leadc vs to fearchc what-
foeuer is lawfull to be learned of him : that it is the only hght, which
may giuc vs light to fee whatfoeuer we ought to fee of him : it Hiall
cafily holdc backc and reftraine vs from all rafhcneffe. For we rtiall
know that fo foone as we be gon^ out of the bounds of the word,wc
runne out of the way,and in dirkencire,in which race wc muft nedcs
oftentimes ftray4l!ppe,and ttumble.Firft therefore lette this be be-
fore our eyes , that to couet any other knowledge of Predeftination '
than that which is fet forth by the word of God,is a point of no lefle
madnefle than if a man hauc a will to goc by an vnpaflablc wayCj
or to fee in darkencire.Neith#let vs be afhamcd, to be ignorant of
fomewhat in it wherein there is fome learned ign6rancc. But rather
let vs willingly abftaine from the fearching of t^at knowlcdge,wher-
of the cxcclTiue coucting is both fooliU and perillous,yea & deadly.
But if the wantonnes of wit prouokc vs,it flialbe profitable alway to
fet this againft it,whercby it may be beaten backe, that as too much
of honey is not good,fothe fearchingc of glory doth not turnc vnto
ro.i5. glory to the curious . For there is good caufewhy wc ftiouldc be
7" fraicd away from that boldnes,which can do nothingc but throw vs
downc headlong into ruine.0
5 There be other which when they hauc a will to remedy this «• *
oill^do commaund all mcntio of Predeftination to be in a mancr bu»
ried, at the leaft they teach me to flee from euery maner of queftio-
ningthereofas from a rocke. Although ihemoderatio ofthefe men
be herein worthily to be praifed,that they iudge y myfteries fhouldc
be tafted of vv fuch fobriety:yet becaufe they defcend too much be-
neath the meanc,they litle prcuaile with the wit of man, which doth
nothghtly fuffer it Ct.'\{c to be reftrained. Therfore,y in this behalfc
alfo we may keepe a right cnde , we muft returne to the word of the
Lordjin which we hauca furc rule of vndetftandjngc.For,the Scrip-
ture is the fchoole of the holy Ghoft, in which as notiimg is left out:
which is both neceftary and profitable to be knowcn , fo nothingc is
taught but that which is behouefull to learne. Whatfoeuer therefore
is vttered in the Scripture c5cerning Predeftination, wc muft beware
that we debarre not the faithfull from it, leaft we (hould feme cither
enuioufly to defraude them of the benefite of their God,or to blame
and accufe the holy Ghoft who hath publiflicd thofe thinges,which
it is in any wife profitable tp be fupprcfl'cd.Lct vs(I fay)giuc Icauc to
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 382
a Chriftian man, to open his minde and hif cares to all the fayini^s of
God which arc dircded to him , to that it be done with this tempe-
rance,thac fo foonc as the Lord hath ciofed his holy mouth,hc may
alfo forefdofe to himfelf all y way to enquire furthcr.This fhalbe the
bell bound of fobrictyjif not onely in Icarninge we alway follow the
Lord going before vs,but alfo when he maketh an end of teaching> P'<*.* J»
we ceafle to will to learne.Neither is the danger which they feare of **
fo great: importace,that we ought therfore to turne away our mindes
from the oracles God. Notable is the fayinge of Salomon, that the
glory of God is to concele a word.But fiih both godlinelTe and com-
mon reafofl teacheth that this is not generally meant of eucry thing,
we muft feekc a ditFercnce, Icafl: briiullie ignorance (hould pleafe vs
vnder colour of modefty and fobriety.That difFerece is in few words
plainly fet out by MofescTo the Lord our God(rayth he)bclong his ^
fecretei:butto vsandro our children he hath difclofcdthcfc things. ,„
For we fee how he commendcth to the people the ftudy of the dof
^rine of the law,only by reafon of the decree of Godjbecaufc it plea-
fed God to publiih it : & how he withholdeth y people within thofc
boundcs,by this only reafon becaufeitis not lawful for mortall men
to thruli chcmfelucs into the fccrets of God.
4 Prophanc men(I gf aunt)do in the matter of Predcftination fo-
dainly catch hold of fomwhat v/hich they may carpjOi cauiljor baike,
or fcoffe at.But if their waiwardnes do fray vs away from it,the chief
articles of the faith muft be kept fecretjof which there is almoft none
w'lich ihey or fuch as they be do leaue vntouched with blafphemy,
A fi oward wit will no leil'e proudly outrage when he heareth that ia
thefllcnce of God there arc thr^e perfons,than if he heare that God
fordaw what flioulde become of man when he created him. Neither
wiU they abftainc from laughinge,when they fhall vnderftandc that •
there is lidc more than fine thoufand ycres pafled lince the creation
of the world : for they will aske why the power of God was fo longc
idell and a flepe.Finally there can be nothinge brought foorth,which
they will not fcoffe at. For the reftraininge of thcfe facrileges,muft we
holde our peace of the GodhcatJe of the Sonne,& of the holy Ghoft.^
or muft we paffe ouer in filence the creatio of the world?Yea but the
tructh of God is both in this behalfe and euery where mightier than
that It necde tq feare the eijill fpeakinge of the wickcd:as Auguftinc Cap rj
ftrongly maintaincth inhis worke of the good of Perfeuerance. For vfquc
we fee that the falfc Apoftles could not by defaming and fclandering *d lo.
the true Dodrine of Paule,make him to be afhamcd of it. But whcr-
as they fayc that this whole 4>rputauon is pcrillous alfo for Godly
Cap.2 1 . Of the maner how to rccciuc
mindeSjbccaufc it mlaketh againft exhortati5s,becaufc it Ihakcth faith
Oeho- becaufe it troublcth the heart it felferthis is vainc. Auguftine ftickcth
lo per- not to confeffc that for thefc caufcs he was wont to be blamed , for
rcucr. jj^^j. j^^ j-^ jQ freely preach Predcitination:but,as he had in readines
^*^ * wherwithal,hc largely confuteth the.But we, becaufe many & diuers
abfurdities are chruft into this place, had rather to referuecucry
one to be wiped away in place fit for it.Only this I defire generally to
obtaine of them,that thofc thingcs which the Lorde hath layd vp in
fecret,wc may not fearch;thofe things which he hath brought openly
abroadcjwe may hoc negled:ieaft either on the one part we be con-
demned of vainc curiofity,or on the other part,of vntharfkefulnefle.
Lib.^ For , this alfo is very well fayd of Auguftine, that we may fafely fo-
^A P*"* ^^^ ^^^^ Scripture, which as with a motherly pace goeth ftoupingely,
* ^ ** leaft it (houlde forfakc our weakcnefle. But who fo arc fo ware and fo
fcarefull that they woulde haue Predeftination to be buried , leaft ic
fliould trouble weakc foules:with what colour, 1 befech yoii,wil they
couer ihcir arrogance , when rhey indircdly accufc God of foolidic
^ vnaduifednciTcas though he forfaw not the dangcr,which they think
themfclucs to haue wifely met with ? Whofoeuer thcrfore trauailcth
to bring the dodrine of Predeftinatio mto miflfking,he openly faith
euill of God : as though fomwhat had vnaduifcdly Hipped from him
which is hurtfulto the Church.
^ 5 Predeftinatio wherby God adopteth fomc into f hope oflife,&
iudgeth fome to eternal deatb,no man that would be ac copied godly
dare (imply deny : But tliey wrap it vp with many cauillations,rpcci-
ally they which make foreknowledge the caufc of it.We in decde do
fay that they be both in God , but we fay that the one is wrongfwlly
tnade fubied to the other. When we giue foreknowledge to GodjWC
•ineane thar all things alway haue bin and perpetually do remaine vn-
der his cies , fo that to his knowledge there is nothinge to come or
paft,but all thinges are prcrent,& fo prefent that he doth not imagine
only by conceiucd formes (as thofe things are prefent to vs,whereof
our minde holdeth faft the remembj^ance) but he trucly bcholdeth &
(ceth them as fet before him. And this foreknowledge extendcth to
- the whole compaffe of the world and to all creatures. Predeftination
we call the eternal decree of God, wherby he had it determined with
himfclfc what he willed to become of euery man.For al arc not crea-
ted to bke cftateibut to fome,eternalllife,and to fome,eternall dam-
nation is foreappointed . Therefore as euery man is created to the
one or other ende,fo we fay that he is prcdeftinatc either to life or to
death. But this predeftination God h^th not pncly tcftificd in euery
fcu?rgll
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j, 383
feucrall perfon,buc hath (hewed an example thcrof in the whole iffuc
of Abraham , whereby might plainly appcaie that it licth in his will
what flialbe the cftate of cuery nation . When the Hieft diuidcd the d«u,3»
nations, and fcuered the children of Adam , his part was the people 8.
of Ifracll, the corde of his inheritance. The reparation is before the
cies of all men:in the pcrfon of Abraham as in a drie ftockc one peo-
ple is pecuLarly chofen>all other being refufedibut the caufe appca-
reth not, fauinge that Mofes, to cut of all occafion of glorying from
pofterity,teacheth that they exccll only by y fre loue of God.Forhc Deu. 4.
afligneth this to be the caufe of their dehucrace, for that God loued i 7»
the Fathers , and chofc their feede after them. More plainely in an
other chapter : He was pleafed in you to chofc yoUjfiot becaufe you Deut.7.
paflcd other nations in number,but becaufe he loued you. The fame ^•
admonition is often repeated with himjBeholdjto the Lord thy God ^*"' '•
belongeth the hcauen,thc e4rth,and whatfoeuer things are in itrand *^*
he hath pleafed himfclfc only in your Fathers , and hath loued them,
& hath chofen you their fede. Againe in ^ other place fandificatio is
commaunded them, becaufe they are chofen to be a peculiar people I>eu.»|
And againe in an other placc,Loue is affirmed to bey caufe of prote- 5-
dion. Which alio the faithfuJl do declare with one voice,fayinge:He J*'^^*
hath chofen for ys our inheritace.the glory of Iacob,whom he hath
loued.For they do all impute to free loue al the giftes whcrwith they
were garaiftied of Godmot only becaufe they knew that they them-
felues had obtained the by no dcferuingSjbut alfo that eucn the holy-
Patriarch was not endued with fuch vertue, that he couldc purchale
to himfelfe and his pofterity fo great a prerogatiue of honor. And,
the more ftrongly to treade downe all pride, he vpbraided them that
they haue deferued no fuch thing,forafmuch,as they are a ftubbornc
& hard necked people. And oftentimes y Prophets do hatefully & as Dcuc.j.
by way of reproch caft the Icwes in the teeth with this eledion, be- ^.
caufe they had fowly departed from it. Whatfoeuer it be,now let the
come foorth which will binde the eledion of God either to the wor-
thincs of men,or to the merites of works. When they fee one nation
to be preferred before all other, & when they hearc y God was led
with no refped to be more fauorably bet to a few & vnnoble,yea &
froward and difobedicnt men: will they quarell with him,bccaufe his
will was to {hewe fuch an example of mercy ? But they fhall neither
with their p ratling voices hinder his work, not with throwino ftone«
oftauntcs into heaucn fhall hit or hurt his righteoufnc0c, but rather
they flial fallbackc vpo their ownc heads.MoreouerthcIfraelitsare
called h^ckc to thitptinciplc of the free coucnanr,whe either thanks
Cap,2 1 . Of the maner how to rccciuc
arc CO be giue to God, or their hope to be raifed vp againit die time
to come.Hcmade VS5 & not we our fehies(fhithy Prophet) his peo-
ple and the fheepe of his paflures.The ncgatiue is not fupcrftuous,
which is added to exclude vsjthat they may knowe y of all the good
ihinges wherewith they excclljGod is not onely the a«ihor,but fet-
ched the caufe thereof from himfelfcbecaufc there was nothm* in
them ^volthy of To great honor. Alfo he biddcth them ta be conten-
ted with the mere good pleafurc of God,in thefe words,The feede of
>fa.i05 Abraham arehisfcruantcsithe children of Iacob,his eled.And after
'• that he hath rehcarfed thecotinual beoefifsof Godasfruitesofthc
cledion,at length he cocludech, that he dealt fo liberally becaufc he
remembred his^ouenant. With which dodrine agreeth the fon^ of
'ral.44 the whole Church,Thy right hand and the light of thy countenance
h gauc the land to our Fathers^becaule thou waft pleafed in them. Buc
it is to be noted, that where metion is made of the landjit is a vih'blc
figne of the fecret feuering wherin the adoption is cotainedTo the
fame rhankefulnefle Daui^n an other pbce exhorceth the people,
Pfal J faymgjBlelTcd is the natio whofc God the Lord isjthe people which
11 hehathchofcnforaninherit.mcetohimfcire. AndSamucUcncou-
t.Sa.ac rageth them to good hope/ayingjTIie Lo; d wil! not forfakc you/or
*'• hisownegreatnamesfakejbecaufe it pleafed him 10 create you for a
people to himfelfe.Likewife Dauid when his faith is afiailedjarmeth
^fal.<f 5 himfelfe to Hght, fayinge, BlcfTed is he whome thou haft chofen^hc
J» iliall dwell in thy courtes . But forafmuch as the eledion hidden in
God was ftabhfiied as well by the firft dehuerance as by the fccond,
and other mcanc bensfitcs-.in Efay the word of Eledmg is transfer-
, ^'^^' red to this . God fhall haue mercy on lacob , and he Ihali yet choofc
out of Ifraelhbecau'e he fignifying the time to comc,fayth that the
gathering together of the remnant of the people which he femcd to
haue foriakenjfhalbe a figne of the ftable and ftedfaft eledion,which
ones feemed to haue bin fallen away.When alfo it is fayd in an orher
r r place,! haue chofen thee & haue not caft thee away : he fetteth out
^/ ' the continuall courfe of the notable hberality of his fatherly good
£ach. 2 will. And yet more plamely the Angell fayth in Zacharie, God fhall
> 2. yet choofe lerufalem : as though in hardly chaftingc it, he had rcic-
ded )t:or as though the exdc were an interruptinge of the eledion;
which yet rcmaincth iriuiolablc,althoughy lignes therof do not al-
way appeatc.
6 There is to be added a fecod degree more narrowly rcftraincd,
©r in which was fccnc a more fpeciall grace of God : when of the
fame kiiucd of Abraham God refufcd feme , & other fome by nou-
rilhing
The grace of Chrift^ Lib.3. 3%
tifhingc them in the Church he llicwcd that he reteined amonge his
childrc.Ifmael h^d at y beginning obtained egall degre with his bro-
ther Ifaac , becaufc the fpiricuall coucnant had bin no lelTc fcaied in
him by the figne of Circucifion. He is cur of:and then,Erau;at the laft
an innumerable multitude and almoii Ifraell. In Ifaac was the fecde
calledthe fame calling endured m lacob. A like exaple God fhewed
in reiedmg Saul:which thing is alfo glorio^Py fet forth in the Pfalm,
He hath put backc the tribe of Ioreph,& y tribe of Ephraim he hath pf^^ _•,
not chofen,but he hath chofen the tribe of luda. Which the holy hi- 6^
ftory diuerfe times repeateth, that the wonderfull fccret of the grace
may the better appeare in this change. irmaell,bfau,and fuch other,
(I graunt)fcll from the adoption by their owne fault & giltincs;be-
caufe there was a condition adioincd,that they fhould faitnfully kcpc
the coucnant of God,which they falfely brake. But this was yet a An-
gular benefit of God, that he voutchfaued to prefcrre the aboue the
other Gentiles: js it is faid in y Pfalme^He haih not fo done to other
fjattons^nor hath opened his iudgcmentes to them. But here I hauc ^J* ^^*
not without caufe faid that there be two degrees to be noted :bccaufc
nowc in the choofinge of the whole nation God ihewed that he is in
his owne mere liberality bounde to no lawes : but he is free , fo that
cgall portion of grace is not to be required at his handuhc vnequali-
ty whereof llieweth rhat it is trucly of free gift. Therefore Malachic
amphfieth the vnthankefulncfTe of I(rael,becaufe they being not only
chofen out of all mankinde , but alfo feuered out of a holy houfe to
be a peculiar people, do vnfaithfully and wickedly dcfpife God fo bc-
neficiall a Father. Was not Efau the brother of Iacobi?(faith he) & yet »j,
lacob I loued, but Efau I hatcd.For,God taketh it for confefled.that ' * *
when either of them was borne of a holy Father , and fucceflbur of
the couenaunt,finally a braunch of the holy rootc:now the children
of lacob were more than comonly bond, which were taken into that
dignity .But when,Efau the firft begotten being rcfufed,their Father
which was by nature inferiour was made the heire^he proueth them
doublely vnthankefull, and complaineth that they were not holdcn
with that double bound.
7 Although it be already fufficicntly euident, that God doth by
his fccrete counfcll freely choofe whom he will,reicdinge other,yec
his free eledion is hitherto but halfe lliewed , till we come to all par-
ticular perfoncs , to whomc God not onely oflfereth faluation , but —
fo afligneth it that the certainty of the effed tReroHs not in fufpenfe
or doutfull. For, there are accompted in that onely fcede, whcreot
Paule makcth mention . For although the adoption was left in the
Cap.2i. Ofthcmanerhowtorcceiuc
hand of Abraham , yet becaufe many of his pofteiity were cut ofas
rotten m«mbers : that the cledion may be efteduall and trucly fted-»
faftjWe muft nedes afcend to the licad^m whom the hcauenly Father
hath bound together his ele<^onc with an other, & hath knit them
to himfclfe with a knot impofTible to be loofed So in the adoption of
the kinred of Abrahamjfhincd the hberall fauour of God, which ho
denied to other me:yet iQ the members of Chnft,appearedi a much
more excellec ftrengthofgrace,bccaufe they being grafFed inro their
head do neuer fall away fro faluation.Therefore Paul doth fitly rea-
fon out of the place of Malachy which I euen now alleaged:y where
God with makinge a coucnant of eternall life calleth any people to
bimfelfcthere is in partti fpecial maner of eledionjthat he doth not
chocfe all effedually with common grace. Whereas it is fayd, I haue
loued lacobjthis pcrtaineth to y whole ifluc of the Patriarch , which
the Prophet there fctteth in coparifon againft the pofterity of Efau,
Yet this withftandeth not but that in the perfon of one man was fee
foorth to vs an example of the eledion, which can not flip away bu^
muft come to the marke that it rcndethto.Thefc Paul doth notvain**
ly note to be called rcmnantcs:becaufe experience tcacheth that of a
great multitude many flfde and vanilh awayjfo that oftentimes there
rcmaineth butafmall portion. But why the generall eledionofa
people is not alway hrme & ftedfaft,there is a rcafon offring it lelfe
in readineflerbccaufc with whom God couenanteth he doth not by-
andby giue to them the Spirite of regeneration, by the power wher-
of they may continue in the couenant to the ende: but the outward
changinge without the inward efFeduallneflfe of grace , which might
be of force to holde them in,is a certainc meane thinge betwene the
forfaking of whole mankinde > and the eledion of a fmall number of
the Godly . The whole people of Ifraell \jas called the inheritance
of God , of whom yet there were many ftrangers . But becaufe God
had not for nothinge made couenant with them that he woulde be
their Father and redeemer , he rather hath refped to his owne free
fauour than to the vnfaithfull fallmg away of manyrby whom alfo his
tiueth was not abolifhed : becaufe where he referued any remnant , it
appeared that his callingc was without repentance. For wheras God
did from time to time choofe vnto himfelfe a Church rather out of
the children of Abraham , than out of the propbanc nations,he had
regard to his coucnant,which being broken of the whole multitude
he reftrained to a few, that it (hould not vttcrly fall away. Finally the
common adoption of the feede of Abraham was a certaine vifiblc i-
niagc of a greater benefit, which God hath vouchfaued to graunt to
few
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 38^
few outofmany. This i« the reafon why Paule fo diligently puttcth
difference betwene the children of Abraham according to the flefh,
and his fpiricuall children which were called after the example of l-
faac. Not that it was a vaine and vnfrutefull thinge fimply to be the
childe of Abraha(\vhich might not be fayd wnhcut difhonor of the
couenant ) but becaufe the vnchangeable counfell of God, where-
by he hath predeftinate whom he would,is by it felfe cfte6uall only
to this later forte vntofaluation . But I warne the readers that they
bringc net a foi econceiucd iudgement on either (idc , till it appearc
by the places of Scripture brought forth what is to be thought. That
therefore which the Scripture clearely flieweth , we fay that God by
cternall and vnchangeable counfell hath ones appointed whomc in
time to come he would take to faluationjand on the other fide whom
he would condemne to deftrudion.This counfell as touchinij the e-
led J we fay to be grounded vpon his free mercy without any rcfpect
of the worthinclfe of man:but whom he appointcth to damnation,to
them by his iuft in dedc and irreprehenf)ble,but alfo incomprehenfi"
hie iudgement,the cnrry of life is foreclofed.Now in the eled wc fet
vocation,to be the tcftimcny of Eledion:& then iuftificaticn to be an
other figne of the manifert ihewing of it,til they come to glory wher-
in is the fulltilling ofit. But as by vocation and eledion God makeih
his elcd-.fo by fhutting out the reprobate either from the knowled.;c
of his name or from the fandification of his Spirite,he doth as it were
by thefe markes open what iudgement abidcch for them. I will here
paffe ouer many famed inuentions, which foolilh men haue forged
to ouerthrowe predeftination. For they nede no confutation, which
fo fone as they are brought forth do largely bewray their owne falfe-
neffc.I will cary only vpon rhofe, which either arc in controuerfie a-
mong the lcarned,or which may bring any hardmelTe to the (imple,
or whicl) vngodlineffc with faire fecming fliow pretcndeth,to fcoffe ac
the righteoufnelTe of God.
The xxij. Chapter*
^confirmation ofthu do£frine by tejlimonies of the ScriptHrt.
AL thefe thinges whifh we haue fet are not without contro-
uerfie amonge many , fpccially the free eledion of the faith-
ful] : which yet can not be weakened. For the common forte
do thinke that Gcd, as he forefceth that eucry mannes de-
feruinges l}ialbe,fo makech difference betwene men : that therefore
whome he forcknoweih that they (halbe not vnworthy of his grace,
,ccc
Cap.2 2 . Of the maner how to rcceiitc
thtni he adopteth into place of children : and whofe natures he C*
fpieth that they will be bent to wickednefle and vngodline0c, them
he nppointeth to the damnanon of death. So by clokinge it with the
veilc of foreknowledge they do not onely darken eledion,butfaine
that it hatli beginninge from elfe where. And this opinion receiued
of the common forte is not the opinion of the common forte alone:
form all ages it hath had great maincaineis. Which I do plamly c6-
fefle , to the entent that no mannc Hioulde trufi that it ihall much
hurt our caufe if their names be obicded againll vs. For,the triieth
of God herein is more certainc , than that it may be fliaken : more
clcare, than that it may be darkened with the authority of mennc.
But fome other neither exercifed in the Scripture , nor worthy of a-
ny voice , do raile at this dodrine with greater malicioufncfle, than
that their frowarde pride ought to be futfered. Becaufe God choo-
linge fome after his ownc wiljeaueth other fome, they picke a qua-
relLigainllhim . But if the thinge itf-lfe be knowen for true, what
lliall they pre uaile withbrawlingeagaintt God ?" We teach nothing
but that which is approued by experience , that it wasalway ath-
beity for God to bcftowe his sirace to whomc he will. I will not cn-
c]uire whereby the pofterity of Abraham excelled other , but by that
vouchfauinge , whereof there is founde no caufe elfewhercthanin
God. Let them anfwere why they be men rather than oxen or alTes.
W^hcn it was in the hand of God to make them dogges,he fafliioned
tliem after his owne imaec. Will they eiuc leaue to brute beaftes to
quarell with God for their eihte,as though the difiercnce were vn-
nghteous >Truelyit!sno more righteous , that they llioulde enioy
the prerogatiuc which they haue obtained by nodeferuingcs, than
for God diuerfly to dcale abroide his benefitcs according to the mea-
fure of his owne iudgemet.If they skippe ouer to perfons,whf re the
inequality is more hateful to the,flt the lead at the example of Chrift
they ought to be afraid to prate fo boldely of fo hie a myfttrie. He is
conceiued of the feedc of Dauid,a mcrtall manrhy what vertues wil
they fay that he defcrued to be in the very wombe made the head of
Angelsjthe onely begotten lonne of God ,the image & glory of the
De cor- Father , the hght , righteoufncfle, and faluation ot the worlde ? This
r^'^'-n ad ^^^^"S Auguftine wifely noted,that in the very head of the Church is
valcnt. a mo(t clearc mirror of ftee ele<^ion, !eaf> it fhould trouble vsin the
crfp.i s. mcmbf rsrandthathc v/asnot by ri8;hteouflvliumgemade the fonnc
De bo ofGod,but vhe had fo great honor freely ciucnhim , that he might
Jio pt^r afcttwarde make other partakers of his giftes. Here if any manaskc
i[tc. * ' why other were not the fame that he was , or why all we are ^o farrc
diitanc
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. $S6
^iHant from him , wliy all wcbe corrupt andhcpurcncsrfuch a man Dever,
fluU bewray not oncly his madncirc but therewithal alio his fhamc- '^P^"•
Icfncflc. But if they go forward to labour to take from God the free ^ * *
power to cb.ofe and refufc, let them aifo t.ike away that which is gi^
ucn to Chnft.Now it is worth the trauaiie to cofjder what the Scrip-
ture pronounccth of euery one. Panic vcnly, when he teachetli that Eph.1.4
wc were chofcn in Ch.ift , taketh away all refpedofour ovvne wor-
thincffe . For It is all one as if he haddc fayd; bcrcaufcin the whole
feedc of Adam the hcauenly father founde nothing worthy of his c-
lc(fhon,he turned his eies vnto his Chrift,ro choofc as it were mem-
bers out of his body them whom he wouldc take into the fclowfiiip
ot hFc.Lct this rcafon then be of force amonge the faithful!, that wc
were therefore adopted in Chnft into the heauenly inhentance,be-
caufem ourfelaeswe were not abletoreceiuc fo great cxcclJeiicc.
Which alio he toucheth in an other pbce,when he exhorteth v Co- Co!o. 1,
lofium^ to giuinge of thmkcs , for this that they were by God made i ».
fit to be partakers of the eftate of the holy. If election go before this
grace of God , that we be made Ht to obtaine the glory of the Ire to
come:wha: Ihall God himfclfe nowe finde in vs, whereby he may be
moued to cled vs.^My meaning fhal yet be more openly cxprcfied by
an other faymgeofhi^ He hath chofen vs(fayth he)erethefunda- gpj^ , .
tios of the world were laid, according to the good pleafurc of his wil,
that we might be holy,and vnfpotted,and vnreprouable in his flight:
wh ere he fcttcth the good plealurc of God againlt all our dcfcruings
whatfocucr they be.
2 That the proofc may be more ftronge,it is worth the labour to
note jU the partes of that place , which beinge coupled together do
Icaue no dout. Where he nameth the eled, it is no dout that he fpea-
keth to the faithfuil,as he alfo byandby afterward affirmethAViierc-
forc they do with too fowle a glofe abufe that name , which wrtrt it
to the age wherein the Gofpell was firft publiHud . Where he fayth
that they were eleft before the beginninge of the worlde,hc lakfth
av/ay all refped of worthines. For, what reafon of difference is there
bctwcne them which yet were not,andthofe which afte^ w.rd ihould
in Adam be egall ? Nowe if they be cled in Ciirift , »t follcwcth ihsc
not only euery man is feucred without himf h'c, but alio one of the
from an other , forafmuch as we fee that not all are the member* of
Chrift.That which is added, that they were t led that they mi ght be
holy, plainely confutcththe errour whicli dcriucth cledion from
forcknowl<rdw^e .forafmuch as Paulcciieth outagainft it and fayeth
that whaifocuervertueappcarcthin men, it is the tffcd of election.
CCC i;
Cap.2 2. Of the maner how to receiuc
Now if a hier caufc be foughcPaul anfwcrcth,that God hath Co prtf-
deftinate,yea and that according to the good pleafure of his will. In
which wordcs he ouerthroweth whatfoeuer meanes of their clcdion
men do imagine in thcmfelues.For he alfo teacheth that whatfoeuer
thinges Godgiueth toward fpiritualUifc , they Howe out of this one
fountain, becaufe God hath chofen whom he would, & ere they were
borne he had feuerally layd vp for them the grace which he vouch-
faiiedtogiue them.
5 But whercfoeuer this pleafure of God reigncthjthere no works
come to be confidered. He doth not here in deede purfue the com-
parifon of contraries,but it is to be vnderftanded fuch as he himfelfe
(iecIarcth.He hath called vs(faith he)with a holy calling, not accor-
ding to our workcSjbut accordmg to his purpofe & the grace which
is giuen of Chrifl before the times of the world. And we haue already
(hewed that all dout is taken away in this which followcth , that wc
might be holy and vnfpotted.For if thou fayjbecaufe he forefaw that
we fliouid be holy , therefore he chofe vs, ihou fhalt peruert the or-
der of Paule.Thus therefore thou maift fafely gather. If he chofe vs
that we might be holy:then he chofe vs> not becaufe he forefaw that
wc would be fuch. For thefe two thinges are contrary the one to the
other : that the godly hauc itof eledion that they be holy , and that
they come to it by meane of workes.Neither is their cauillation here
any thing worth to which they commonly flee, that the Lorde doth
not render the grace of eledion to any workes goinge beforc,but yet
grauntcth it to workes to come. For when it is fayd that the faithful!
were chofen.that they might be holyrtherewiihal is fignified that the
holineffe which was to come in them tooke beginningc at eledion.
And how fhall this faying agree togcther,th3t thofe things which arc
deriued from elcdion gaue caufe toeledionPIhe fame thing which
he fayd he feemeth afterwarde to confirme more ftrongly, where he
faith, Accordingc to the purpofe of his will which he had purpofed
in himfelfe. Forjto fay that God purpofed in himfelfe, is as much in
effedas if it had bin fayd, y without himfelfe he confidered nothing
wherof he had any regard in decrcing. Therforc he byandby addeth,
that the whole fumme of our cledion tendeth to this ende, that we
fnould be to the praife of the grace of God.Trucly the grace of God
dcferueth not to be praifed alone in our eledio, vnlefle our elcdion
be free.But free it ftiallnor be,if God in eleding his,do cofidcr what
fhalbc the workes of cuery one. Therefore we finde that that which
loh.i 5. Chrift fnid to his difciples.haih place vniucrfally among all the faiib-
^ ^» fuljYe haue not chofen me,bui 1 haue chofe you, Where he not only
excludeth
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 387
cxdudeth defcruinges part, but alfo fignifieth that they had nothing
in themfelues why they fhouldc be chofen.if he had not picucnted
them with his mercy.Like as this faying of Paule is alfo to be vnder- Rom.ii
ftoodciWho fiift gaue to him,& ihali receiue rccopenfei^For he mea- 35.
neth to flicwe that the goodnciTe of God fo preuenteth men , that it
findeth nothing in them neither paU nor to comc,wherby he may be
wonne to be fauorable to them.
4 Now to the Romaines, where he fetchcth this qtieftio further
ofj& foUovveth it more largely.hc dcnieth that all they arc IfraeJites, Ro.^.tf.
which are iflucd of Ifraell : becaufe although by right of inheritance
they were all bleffed,yet the fucceflion did not egally pafle to the al.
The beginning of this difputation preceded of the pride & deceitful
glorying of the lewilli people. For when they claimed to themfelues
the name of the Church,they would haue y credit of the Gofpell to
hang vpo their wilhas the Papiftcs at this day would gladly with this
faincd colour thruft thcfelues into the place of God.Paule,aIthough
he graunt that the offpringe of Abraham is holy by reafon of the co-
ucnant,yct aftirmeth that the moft part of them are ftrangers in it: &
that not onely becaufe they fv/aruc out of kinde , fo that of lawcfull
children they become baftardes, but becaufe the efpeciall cledion of
God ftadeth aboue & reigneih in the hieft top, which alone maketh
the adoption thereof fure. If their owne godlines ftablifhcd fomc in
the hope of faluation, & their owne falling away alone difherited o-
thcr fome:Paui verily fhould both fondly and vnconueniently lift vp
the readers euen to the fecrct eledion.Nowe if the will of God (the
caufe wherof neither appeareth nor is to be fought without himfelf )
maketh the one fort dift'ering from the other,fo that not all the chil-
dren of Ifraell be true Ifraeht€S,it is vainly fained that euery mans c-
ftate hath beginning in himfelfc.Thcn he further followeth the mat-
ter vnder the example of lacob & EfauFor when they both were the
fonncs of Abraham.both together enclofed in one mothers wombc,
it was a mofterlike change that the honor of firft birth was rcmoued
to lacobjby which change Paul affirmeth that there was tcftiHed the
cledion of the one & the reprobation of the othcr.The originall &
caufe of it is enquired , which the teachers of foreknowledge will
haue to be fet out in the vertues>and vices of men.For this is an ea-
lic (hort way with them^that God fhewed in the perfon of lacobjthac
he choofeth the worthy of his grace:and in the perfon of Efau,he re-
fiifeth them whom he forefeeth to be vnworthy.Thus they fay bold-
ly.But what fayth Paule ? when they were not yet borne,and hadde
pot done any good or euiU,that according to eledion the purpofc of
CCC iij
Cap.2 2. Of the mancr how toreceiuc
Uro.5). God might abide, nor of \vorks,buc of him that calleth,it is faydjThc
"• elder ihall feruc the yonger : as Jt is wrytteiijlacob I haue loucd, but
Efau 1 haue hated. If toreknowledgc were of any force in this diffe-
rence of the brethren, then verily mention weie vnfirly made of the
timc.Ler vs graunt that lacob was chofenjbecaufe he hadworthincs
gotten by v/oikss to come: to what purpofe ihould Paule fay thst he
was not yet borne ? And this now Ihould be vnaduifcdly added, that
he had yet done no good : bccaufe this Ihalbc a ready anfwere, that
nothing js hidden from God, andthat fo the godhnesof lacob was
prefcnt before him. If workes do win grace , they fliould then wor-
thily haue had their price before that lacob was borne as if he had
bin grov/en to full age. But the Apoftlc goeth forward in vndoinge
this knot, and teacheth \hn the adoption of lacob was not made of
workeSjbut of the callinge of God. In workes he enterlaccth not the
time to come or tiracpaft.& then he dirtdlv fettcth them agaiuft the
caliinKofGod,meanmgby flablifhingeof theonc cxptvfly to oaer-
tb.row the othcrras; if he had faid that it is to be colidercd what hath
plcarcvi God, not what men haue brought of themfelues. Laftofallic
is certaine diat by the words of Eledion & Purpofe, all caufes what-
foeucr men are wont to faine elfewhcrc than in the fccret counfel of
God,are quite remould from this matter.
5 What colour wil ihcy bring to datkcn thefc thing«,who in elc-
&.,on iiiifnc Come place to workes cither p-fl or to comef'For this is
Vtterly to mocke 6ut that which the Apoftle affirmeth,that the diffe-
renceof the brethren hangcth not vpon any conlidcration of woiks,
but vpon the mere calling of God.becaufe it was put betwcne them
when they were not yet borne . Neither had he bin ignorant of this
their futtelty>if it had had any foundnes in it:but becaufe he very well
knewjthat God can forefec no goodneffc in man, but that which he
hath lull determined by y benefit of his cledion to giuc him:he flceih
not to that vnovderly order , to fet good workes before the caufe of
themfelues . Thus haue we by the words of the Apoftle that the fal-
uation of the faithful is {oundcd vpon the will of the only eledion of
God:& that the fame fauour is not gotten by works,but commeth of
free calling.Wc haue alfo as it were an image of that thing fet before
vs.Efau & lacob are brethren, iffuing both of one the fame parents,
cnclofed yet both in one wombe,not yet brought out into the world.
In them all things are egall,yer of the y iudgement of God is diuerfe.
For he taketh the one & forfakcth the other.Thcre was nothing but
the only firft birthjby right wherof the one excelled the other.But this
alfo being paffcd ouer,ihat thing is giuen to the yonger which is de-
nied
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 388
nied to the elder. Yea and in o:her alio God ftcmeth alway as of (et
purpofc ro hauc defpifcd hrft birth,to cut of from the flefli all matter
of glorying. Rcfufingc Ifmaclljhc cafthis mindetolfaac.Piackingc
backe ManaiTejhe more honored Ephraim.
• 6 If any man interrupt me with faying that we muft not by thefc
inferiour & fmal benefits determine of the fumme of y life to come,
that he which hath bin aduancedtotiie honor of fit ft birth ,ftiouldc
therfore be rcckened to be adopted into the inheritance of heaucri:
(for there be fome which fpare not Paul hunfclfejas though in allea-
ging thefe teftimonies he had wrtfted y Scripture to aftrage fenfe:)
I anlwere as I haue done hcrchefore, that y Apoftlc neither flipped
by vnaduifcdnes,n6r wilfully abufed y teftimonies of the Scripture.
But hefaw(which they can not abide to confider)that God minded
by an earthly figne to declare the fpiritual election of Iacob,which o-
therwife was hidden in his inacccffible throne.For vnles we refer the
firft birth graunted to him vnto the worlde to come , it fhoulde be a
vaine & fondc forme of blc(fing whereby he obtained nothinge but
mamfolde miferics,dircommodities,grifefull banilhment,and many
bitterneflfe of forrow and cares. Therefore when Paule fawe without
doutinge, that God by outward blefllng leftified the blcfling which
he had m his kingdom prepared fpirituall and neuer decayinge for
his fcruant:he douted not for proofe of this fpiritual bleflingjto fetch
an argument from that outward blefTing. This alfo wc muft remem-
ber that to the land of Canaan was adioyncd the pledge of the hea-
ucnly dwelling:fo that it ought not at al to be douted that lacob was
grafTed with the Angels into y body of Chrift that he might be par-
taker of the fame life. Jacob therfore is chofenjwhe Efau is reieded: Rotr,^.
and by the Prcdeftination of God is made different from him from * 5«
whom he differed not in any d:fcruinges.If you askc a caufejthe A-
poftle rendreth this,becaufe it is fayd to Mofes,! wil haue mercy vpo
whom I will haue mcrcie : and I will vouchfauc to graunt mercy to
whom foeuerl will vouchfaue to graunt mercy. And what,! befccch
you,meancth this ? Verily,the Lord himfelfe moft plainely pronoun-
ceth that men haue in thcmfelucs no caufe why he fhould do t^ood
to them,but he fetcheth the caufe from his own mercy only:& ther-
fore that the faluation of his is his owne worke. When God fetteth
thy faluatio in himfelfe alone.why wik thou defcend to thy felf^Whc
he appointcth to thee his mercy alone, why wilt thou runne to thine
own deferuings^When he holdeth thy thought wholly in his merci-
fulnes alone,why wilt thou turnc part to the beholding of thine own
workcs? Therefore v/c muft nedes come to that leflcr people,whicb
C C C iiij
Cap.22. Ofthemanerhowtoreceiuc
Rom. 1 1 Paul in an other place raythtohauebinforeknowentoGodrnocin
*• fuch fort as thefe men im3gine,to foreknow out ofanidie watchtour
the thinges that he workethnot : but in fuch fenfe as it is oft rcade.
Aft.i. For truely when Peter faith in Luke,that Chrift was by the determi-
*> ned counfell and foreknowledge of God appointed to death,he doth
not brins; God as a looker on but the author of our faluation.So the
i.Pet.i; fame Peter alfo, where he fayth that the faithful! to whom he wrote
*• were chofen accordinge to the foreknowledge of God, properly ex-
prcllVth that fecrete Predeftination whereby God hathmarkedfor
his children whom he would. And the word Purpofe, which he ioy-
neth for a diuers word,exprelling all one thing,forafmucli as it doth
cuery where (ignifie a ftedfaft determination as they commonly call
it,vndoutedly teacheth that God when he is author of our faluation
goeth not out of himfelfe.In which fenfe he faith in the fame Chap-
ter that Chnft was the lambe foreknowen before the creation of the
worlde.For what is more fonde or trifling,than to fay that God from
on hie did ftand looking whenfe faluation Ihould come to mankinde?
—• Therefore in Paul the foreknowen people is as much as a fmall por-
, o * * t'O'^ mingled with the multitude which falfely pretendeth the name
of God.In an other place alfo Paulc to beate downe their boaftinge
which beinge but couered with a viforjdo take vpon themfclues the
chiefe preeminence amog the godly before tiie world,faith that God
knowech who be his. Finally by that fayinge Paule pointeth vnto vs
two fortes of people:rhe one , of the whole kinred of Abraham : the
other,feucrally chofen out otitjand which beinge laid vp vnder the
eiesofGodis hidden from the fightofmen. Audit is nodoutthac
he tooke this out of Mofcs , which affirmcth that God will be mer-
cifull to whom he will ( although he there fpake of the cled people,
whofeeftateinoutwardefecminge was egall) as if hefliouldehauc
fayd , that m the common adoption is included with him a fpeciall
grace toward fome , as it were a more holy treafure:and that the c5-
mon couenauntwithflandeth not but thatthe famefmall number
may be exempt in degree : and he willinge to make himfelfc the free
difpofer and ruler of this thing,precifely denieth that he vvil be mer-
cifull to one rather than to an othcr,for any other refon,but for that
it fo pleafeth him;becaufe when mercy commeth ro him that feeketh
itjtiiough he in dcede fufFcr not a deniall, yet he either preuentcth or
partly getteth to hirafelfe the fauour whereof God claimeth to him-
felfe the praife.
7 Now let the foueraignc ludge & maifter pronounce of y whole
matter. Whe he faw Co great hardneflc in his hcarers^thac he did in a
mancr
The grace of Chrlft. Lib.3. 38^
mancr wafte his woi dcs without fruitc among the multitude : to re-
medie this offence,he crieth out,VVhatrocuer my Father geueih me,
it fliall come to me. For this is the will of my Father,thai whatfoeuer
my Father hath geucnme,! (halnotlofeany thing ofit. Note that Tohn.6,
the begmning is taken at the Fathers gifte , that we may be dehuered ^7»
into the faithfull keping and defence of Chrift.Here fome man per-
aduenture will turnc a circle about , and will take exception , faying
that they onely arc accepted m the propre poflelTlon of the Fa:her,
whofe yecldingc hath bene vohmtarie by faith . But Chrift ftandeth
oncly vpon that pointe,that although the fallings away of great mul-
titudes dolhakcthe whole world , yet the counfell ofGodlhalbc
ftedfcift and ftande fafter than the heauens themfclues,thai his elec-
tion may neuer fade. They arefaidc tohaue benethe eled of the
Fa:her, before that he gaue to them his onely begotten Sonne.They
af ke whether it were by nature:yea rather.them which were llraun-
gers he made his owne hy drawing them to him. There is a greater
clcarenefl'c in the wordes of Chnft.chan can by ^lifting be couered
with any darknellc. No man (faith he) can come to me , vnleffc my lohn.^.
Father drawe him. But who fohachhearde & learned of my Father, ^4'
he commcth to me. If all generally without difference ihouid bowc
their knee before Chrift , then the cledion were commori:bu!: nowc
in the fevvncire of the beJeuers appeareth a manifeft diuerhiie.Ther"
fore after that Chiift had rffirmed that y difciples which were giuc
him , were the peculiar poflcirion of God the Father> within a little
after he added , I pray not for the worlde, but for thofe whom thou loh 17.
hall geuen me , becaufe they are thine. Whereby is proucd that the
whole world belongcth not to the Creator of it , fauing that grace
deliucrcth a fevve from the wrath of God , and from etcrnall death,
which otherwifc fliould haue penftied : but the world it felfe is lefte
in his owne deftrudio to which it was appoimed.In the meane time
although Chrift putte himfelfe meane betweenc,yet he claimcth to
himfelfthe power of choofingin common with the Father. I fpeake loh.? |,
not (fjith he) of all : I knowc whom I haue chofcn. If any man afke * ^'
fro whenfe he hath chofen the, he anfwererh in an other place,Out ^°'* ' ^'
ofthe world , which he excluderh out ofhisprayers whenhecom- *
mendcth his difciples to his Father, This is to be holden, that when
he affirmeth that he knowcth whome he hath chofenjihcre is fi^nif
fied fome fpeciall fort in the generall kinde of men : then , that the
fame fpeciall fort is made to difter not by the qualitie of their owne
vcrtuesjbut by the heauenly decree. Whereupon follov/cth that
many excel! by their owne force or diligence , when Chrift maketh
Cap.2 2. Of the maner how to recciuc
himtclfe the author of eledio.For when in an other place he rcckc-
neih ludas among the elcd, whereas he was a deutll, this is referred
oncly to the office of Apofticfliip which although it be a cLcre
mirror of the fauor of God (as Paule fo oftentimes acknowledgeth
in his owneperfone,) yet itconteineth not in it fclfe the hope of
ctcrnallHiluation. ludas therefore, when he d?d vnfaithfuUy bearc
thcofficeof an Apoftle,mightbc worfe than the deuell; butofthofc
whom Chrirt hath ones graffed into his body , he will fuftle none to
pcriflic : bccaufc in preferuing their falujtion he will per forme that
which he hath promifed , that is , he will ftretch forth the power of
God which is greater than all. For whereas he faith in an other place,
oh.io« Father , of thofe whom thou hafte geuen me , I hauc loft none buc
• the fonne of perdition : although it be an abufiue fpeche by figure,
yet it hath no doutefull meaning. The fiimme is , that God maketh
them his children by fice adoption whom he will hauc to be his
children : and that the inwardc caufe thereof is in himfelfe: becaufc
he his content with his owne fecrete good pleafurc.
8 But Ambrofe Origtne,and Hierome thought that God diftri-
buteth his grace among men , as he forfeeth that euery man will vfc
it well : Yea and Auguftine was ones in the fame opinion. But when
lYl'^' he had better profited in knowled.-e of the Scripture , he notonely
ap.i.* reuoked it as euidcntly falfe , but alio itrongly confuted it : yea and
pifto. after his rcuoking of it, in repi oumg the Pelagians for that they con-
d j'ixc. tinued in the fame error , fayeth : Who can not mcruaill that the A-
° ' poftleknewenot(hismoft furtlefnfe .^Forwhcnhehaddcfctteouc
a thing to be wondi ed at of thefc brethren, while they were not yet
borne, and afterwarde obieded a queftion againft himfelfe , faying:
what then? Is there vniuftice with God? Here was'fittc place for him
to aunfwere , that God forefawe the meritcs of them both : yet he
^omil. fayeth not this,but fleeth to the iudgements and mercy of God. And
" ^°^' in an other place,whcn he had taken away all merites before clcdio,
Here (faith he) is confuted their vaine reafoning which dtfende the
foreknowledge of God againft the grace of G O D, and therefore
fay that we are chofcn before the making of the world,becaufe God
forckne we that we would be good, not that he himfelfe would make
[oh.i J. vs good.He fayeth not this, which faith. Ye haue not chofen me,But
1 6. I hauc chofen you. For if he hadde therefore chofen vs , becaufc he
forknewe that we would be good : he fhould therewithal! alfo hauc
foreknowen that we would choofc him: and fo forth as followeth to
that efFe«5l.Let the teftimonie of Auguftine be of force among them
that Willingly reft in y authority of the Fathcrs.Howc be it Auguftina
"" fuftrcth
The grace or Chnlt. Lib.3. 3po
fijffrcth not himfclte to be feuercd fi om the reft : but by dcere tefti-
monies (heweth that this diran,reem5iu is falfe with y mahcc whciof
the Pebgians burdened him. For in the. xjx. chapter of his bookc of r>« pr*
the Predlftination of Sainctcs , hcallegcdi out of Ambrofc , Chnft "j^^^^^^
calleth whom he hath mercieon. Againe, If he had wiikd,of the ^a ifj
vndeuoucc he might haue made deuouto.But God calleth whom he
vouchraueth:&: whom he will he maketh rehgiousjfi lifted to knittc
tootthcr a whole volume outofAuguftineJ could readily ihewe to
the readers that 1 ncede no other words but his ; bur I will not loade
them with tedioufncire.But go to.Iet vs imagine that they fpcake not
at all : but let vs geue hcde to the matter it Ulfe. A harde qudbo was
moued, whether God diddc righteoufl/ in this that he vouchefaucd
to graunte his grace but to fome:Of which quclho Paul might hauc
vncombrcd hitnfelfe with one word if he had alleged the relpcd of
workes. Why thcrfore doth he it not, but rather continucth on a dif-
courie which abideth in the fame havdenefle ? Why , but bccaufe he
ought not?Fot the Holy ghoft which fpake by his mouth.had not the
dileafe of forgetfulncs.Therforc without any circuft.inces he anfwc-
rcihjthat God therefore fauoreth his eled, becaufc he will: herefore
hath mercy,becaufe he wil.For this Oracle of God. I wilhaue mercy ^^' U'
vppon whom I will haue mcrcy,& I wil (hewe mercie to whom I will *^*
Ihevve mercie , is as much in effcd as if ic had bene laid, that God is
moued to mercy by no other reafon but bccaufe he will haue mercy.
Therefore this faying of Auguftine rcmaineth true, that the grace of
God doth not find menHtt to be chofen.but maketh them.
p Neither do we any c'.ing paflc vpon that futttltie of Thomas,
that the foreknowing, of deferuings.is not in deede the caufe of pre- '"* *•
deftination on the behalfe of the z£t of him that doth predcftinate, t;^^,^^,
bur on our behalfe it may after a certaine maner be fo called, that is, zj.que-
according to the particular wcyeng of Prcdtftination : as when it is ftjo,2j.
faid that God predeftinateth glorie to man by deferuingSjbccaufc he
hath decreed to geue to him grace by which he may deferue gloric«
Forfi::hthe Lordc willin eleftion haue vs to loke vnto nothing but
his meere goodnefle , if any man ftiall couet here to fee any more, it
{halbe a wrongfull gredineffe.If we iufted to ftnue in fljttcltie,we want
not wherewith to beat backe this filly futteltie of Thomas. He affir-
xneth that to the cled glorie is after a certaine mancr prcdeftinate by
dcferuingSjbccaiife the Lord doth after a certain miner predcftinate
to the the grace,by which they may deferue glory.What if I aunfwcr
on the contrary fide and fay thatpredeftination vnto grace , ferueth
ek^ion vnto life, and is as ic were a waiting maide after it? that grace
Cap.22. Otthc maner how to receiuc
is predeftinatc to them, to whom the poffcflTion of glorie hath bene
long ago apointed : becaufe it pleafeth the Loide to bring his chil-
dren from eledion into luftjfication f For thereupon it fiiall followc
that the predeftination of glorie was rather the caufe of the Pre*
deftination of grace , than contrariwife , But away with thefe ftri-
uinges,as things fuperfluous forfuch aslTiall thinke that there is
wjfedome enough for them in the worde of God.For this vas in olde
ivnhr. time truly written of an Ecclefiafticall writer,that ibey which afTignc
* ^Z' the ehdio of God to merites arc more wife than they ought to be.
jbr.i.' ^^ Some do obied that Godfhouldbe contrary to himfelfe, if
ap 1. he fhould vniuerfally call all men to him,& receiuc but a fcwe eleft.
So by their opinion the vniuerfalnes of the promife takcth away the
difference of fpcciall grace. And thus cerraine fobrc men fpeake, not
(o much to oppreffe the truth,as to debarrc crabbed queftions , and
to bridle the cuiiofitie of many .Their will is praife worthy,but their
counfeil IS not to be allowed : becaufe dallying by fhifts is neucr ex-
cufable.But their obieding of it which do more railingly inucy againft
ir,i$ verily to fonde a cauillation,or to Jliamefuli an error. Howe the
Scripture maketh thefe two to agree togcther,that by outward prea-
ching all men are called to Repentance and faith , and yet not to all
men is geuen the Spirit of Repentance and fsiih , I haue in an other
place already declared , and by and by fomcwhai of it muft be re*
peted agame. Nowe that which they require I denic to them , fith it
is two wayes falfe.For,he that thretneih that while it raineth vppon
no OS. one citic, there fhall be drought vppon an other : He that pronoun-
^^"^ ccth that there Ihall in an other place be famine of dodt:ine,bindeth
6t 1 6. ^^^ himfelf with a certaine lawe to call J\ men egaliy. And he which
, forbidding Paule to fpeake in Afia , and turning him from Bithinia
drawcth him into Macedonia,flicweth that it is in his own power to
diftribute this treafure to whomefoeuer it iliall pleafe him. Yet more
fa. 8 . plaincly he fheweth by Efaie , howc he peculiarly diredeth to the
clede the promifes of faluation : for he fayeth of them onely , and
not of all makinde indifferendy , that they (hall be his difciples.
Whereby it is certaine that the dodrine of faluation is wrongfully
fcttc open in common to all men to profite cfFedually , which is faid
to be feuerally laide vp onely for the children of the Chirch.Let this
fuffifcatthis prefcnte,that although the voice of the Gofpell fpeake
Pa 5 J. generally to all , yet the eifte of faith is rare . Efaie afligneth a caufe,
forthatthearmeof theLordeisnotopcntoallmen. Ifhe had faid
that the Gofpell is malicioufly and frowardly defpifed , becaufe
many do ftubbornly rcfufe to heare : peraduenture this color tou-
ching
The grace of Chrift, Lib.3. 35?!
ching vniucrfall callinge J[hould preuaile.Neithcr is it the purpofc of
the Prophet to diminilli the faulte of men , when he tcacheth thac
the fountaine of blindnefTe iSjthat God vouchfaueth not to open his
arme to them : onely he geueth warning > that becaufe faith is a fin-
gular iiift,thc cares are beaten in vaine with outwarde dodrine. But
I would faine knovvc of thefe doftors , whether oncly preaching , or
faith,make the children of God.Cerramly when it is faid m the firft
chapiter of Iohn,Whofocucr belcue in the onely begotten Sonne o{ ^^^" -*«
God,are themfelues alfo made the children of God , there is not in *''
that place a confufed heape iumbled vp togethenbut a Ipeciall order
is geuen to the faithfull , which are borne not of blood , not of the
will of the flelli, nor of the will ofman, butof God. But (fay they)
there isamutuall confent of faith with the word. Namely wherc-
focuer is faith. But it is no ncwe thing that feede fall among thornes
or in ftonie places : not onely becaufe the greater part appcareth m
deede obftinatc againft God) but alfo becaufe not all mtn haue eyes
& eares.How then fhal it agree that God callcth to him the who he
knoweth will not come ? Let Auguftine aunfwere for me. Wilt thou De
difpute with mc?Meruaile with mejand crie out,0 depth. Let vs both vei b. A-
agree in feare,leafl: we perilli in error? Moreouer if eledion (as Paule poft-^*^
witneffcth) be the mother of faith, I turne backc the argument vpon "^®****
their owne head,that faith is therforc not generall^becaufe cleftion
is fpeciall.For by the orderly hanging together of caufes & effedes,
it is eafily gathered that where Paule faithjthat we are full of all fpi- Fphe.i
rituall blefling,as God had chofen vs before the crcatio of the world: j.
therefore chefc richeflTc are not common to all , becaufe God hath
chofen onely whom he would. This isthereafon why in another Tit i.i
place he comendeth the faith of the elede,leaft it (hould be thought
that any man doth by his owne motion get faith to himfelf : but that
this glorie may remaine v/ith God,thac they ai e freely cnlightncd of
him,whome he had chofen before.For Bernarde faith rightly, Fren- Adrho.
des do feuerally heare , to whom he alfo faith , Fcare not thou fmall S'^^^^*
flocke ;for to you it is geuen to knowerhe mifterieof rhckingdomc Epi(i„^
of heauen.Who be thefe? euen they whom he hath forcknowen and 107.
prcdeflinate to be fafhioned like to the image of his Sonne. A great
and fecrete counfell is made knowen. The Lorde knewe who be his:
but that which was knowe to God,is made manilelt to men:neither
doth he vouchfafe to make any other partakers of fo great a misery,
but thofe felfe fame men whome he hath forknowen & pccdeftinate
to be his. A little after hcconcludeih. Themercic of God is from
ccernitic cucn to ctcrnicic vpon them that fearc him:from ctcrnitic^
Cap.22. Ofthemancrhowtoreceiue
by reafbn of prcdcftinatio:!© etermtic, by reafon of blelVcd making:
the one without hes[innin;,v other without errdino. But what ncedc
I to cite Bctnarde For witncHe, when we heai e of the mr.dcrs ownc
Mm 6 "^0"fh,than none doe fee but they which are of God? By which
^4, * wordes he fignilieth, that all they which are not begotten asiainc of
Godjdodaftiintthebrightncfieof his countcnacc. And toel:dion
faith in deedeis fittlyiomed/o chatitkcpe the fecod degrce.Which
o"der the wordes of Chrill do clercly expreffe in an other place.
This is the wsll of my Fatherjthat I lofc not that which he ha:h giuc.
For this is his will , chat whofoeuer bcleueth in the Sonne dial] not
perifli. If he y^ould haue all faued , he would appoint oucr them his
Sonne to be their kepcr , and would ?,raffe them all into his body
with the holy bond of fjith. Nowc it is certain that faith is a fingular '
pledge of his fatherly looe,ljyedvp for his children whom he hath
foh.io. adopted. Therefore Chrirt in an other place faith chat the ihepc
^ followe the fliepherd.becaufe they know his voice'.butthcy followc
not a fiiangcr, becaufe they knovve not the voice of ftraun^ers,
Whenfe commeth this diffcrefe, but becaul'e their eares are beared
by God ? For no man makcth himfclfe a fliepe : but he is made one
by the heaucniy grace For which caufe alio the Lorde teachet'i that
our fafetie fhall alway be certaine and free fom dangeijbecaufe it is
keptc by thcinuincible power of God. Wherefore heconcludcth
thaty vnbelcueis are not of his fliepe': namely becaufe they are not
% of the number of them jwhome God hathpromifcd by E(a:c that
they flialbe his difciplrs . Nowe becaufe in the teftimomes which I
haue alleged i- cxpicfTcd pcrfeucrance , they do therewithall tcftific
the vnmouable ftedfaftnefie of cicdion.
II Nowc let vs fpeake of the reprobate , whom the Apofllc
Pom 5). ioinech there together. For as lacob , hauing yet with good workcs
'i- dcfcrued nothing, is taken into grace : fo Erau,being yet defiled with
no wicked doinge , is hated. If we turne our eyes to workes , we do
wron?,tothe Apoftle,as though he fawenotthe fame thing which
we clcrely fee. It i? proued that he (awe it not , forafmuch as he ex-
prelly enforceth this pointe , that when they had not yet done any
good or euell , the one was chofen , and the other refufed , to prouc M
that the foundation of the prcdcftination of God is notin workeS. 1
Acaine when he moued rhe obie(fti6,vvhether God be vnrighteous, *
he allcucth not that which had bene the moft certaine and plaine de-
fence of his riRhteoufncflcjnamely that God reduced to Efau accor-
ding to his eucllneife : hut he was content with an other folution,
tijat tlie reprobate arc ihrred vp to this ende, that the gloric of God
may
The grace of Chrift. Lib.;. 392
may be fct forth by them. Laft of all he adioineth a concluding fcn-
tcncc , that God hath mcrcie vpon whomc he will , and hardencth
whom he will. See you not howe he imputeth both to the onely will
of God? Therefore ifwecannot declare a reafon whyhevouchfa-
uethtograunt mcrcie to them that be his, but becaufe it foplcfcth
him:neither alfo fhall we haue any other caufc in reicding of other,
than his own will.For when it is faid that God hardenetb,or (hewcth
mercie to whome he will , men arc thereby warned to fekc no caufc
ells where than in his will.
The xxiij. Chapter.
^ (Confutation ofthtfclaunders vvherevvtth thu doHrint hath al way
bent V hrongfuHj burdened
Vtwhcn the win of man hcareth thcfe things, the froward-
nefle thereof can not be rellraincdjbut chat by & by as at rhc
bloody blaftof a trumpet, founding to battp.ile,irdiucrf]y and
exceffiuely turmoylech. And many in deede , as though they
Would driue away the malice from God,dofo grauntcel dion,thac
they denie that any man is reprobateibut they do to i gnorantly and
childifliely : forafmuch as elcdion it fclfe could not ftande vnlefTc it
were fet contrary to reprobation:God is faid to feuer them whom he
adopteth vnto faluation : it fliould be more than fooiiflily faid that
other do either by chaunce or by their owne endeuor obteine that
which onely elcdion gcueth to a fcwe.Thcrfore whom God paflcrh
oucr,he rciedeth : and for none other caufe, but for that he will ex-
clude them from the inheritance which.he doth predcftinatc to his
children. Neither is rhe waiwardacs of men tolcfab!e,if it fuffre not it
felfe to be bridled with the word of God,where the incoprehenfibic
counfell of God is entreated of, which the Angels thcmfelues do
worfhip.But we haue already heard, that hardening is no Icfl'e in the
hand and will of God than mcrcie. Neither doth Paul (as thefe men Rom.^
do that I haue fpokenof) bufily labour to excufe God with a lying 20.
dcfcncerbut onely he teacheth that it is not lawfull for the thing for-
med to quarel with him that formed it.Now who fodo not admit that
any are reieded of God, howe wdl they vnconibre themfclues from
that faying of Chrifl ,Euery tree which my father hnih not planted, Mat ij.
fhalbe plucked vp by the roote? They plainly heare that all they are 1 5.
adiudged and auowed to deflrudion , whomc the hcarenly Father
hath nor vouchfaued to plat as holy trees in his ground. If they denie
this to be a figneof rcprobati6,thcnis thcrcnothingfoclere thatic
may be proucd to thcm.But if they ceffc not to wranglejict y fobricty
Cap.2 3 . Of the maner how to recciuc
Rom,<). ot faith be contented with this admonition of Paulc^that there is no
**• caufc to quarel with God , if iie willing on the one fide to fhevve his
wrarh and to make his power knov;cn do with dummc fufferaccand
lenitie beare with the veflels of wrath prepared to deftrudion : and
on the other fide he make knowen thericheflfcof his glorie toward
the velTels ofmercy which he hath prepared to glory.Let the Rcders
markejhowe Paul to ciitte of occafion from vyhifperinges & backbi •
tingesjgeueth the chiefe rule to the wrath & power of God:b}'caurc
it is vniuft that thofe depe iudgemecs which fwaliowe vp all our fen-
fcSjfhould be made fubied to our determination. Our adueriarics
anfwere is very trifling,that God doth not vtre; ly reicd them whom
he fuffreth in lenitie , bur abideth with a minde hanginge in fufpence
towarde them, if peraduenrure they may repente. As though Paulc
geucrh to God a patiencc,to loke for their turning,whome he fayeth
libr. 5. to be made to deftrudion.For, Auguftme faith rightly where lie ex-
contra poundcth this place, where power is ioined to fufterance, God doth
lul. c 5. j^Qt Cy^-j.j ^ |jm gouerne with his po",ver. They further fay alfo that ic
is not for nothing faid that the veffels of wrath are prepared to de-
ftrudion: but,thatGod hath prepared the vcffc'ls ofmcrcierbecaufc
by thismeanehe afcribeth and chaKngeth the praife of faluarionto
God , but the blame of deftrudion he c.ifteth vpon them which by
their owne will do bring itvpon ihemfelues. But although I graunt
to them that Paul by the diuerfe maner of fpeaking didde foftcn the
roui-hnelfe of the firrt part of the fentence , yet it is not mcete to
adigne the preparing vnro deftrudion to any other thing than to the
lecret counfell of God • which alfo is affirmed a little before in the
rtft of the rcxte,That God Ihrred vp Pharao:The, that he hardneth
whom he will. Wherupon followeih that the hidden counfell of God
libr 1. isthecaufeofhardning.Thisattheleftlget which Auguftine faith,
dc pre that when Godof wolues maketh{hepc,he doth with a mightier
fa^na"' ^"'^^ reforme them,that their hardnes may be tamed: and therefore
cap. 2. ^<^^ ^^^ f^'S caufc doth not conuert the obftinate , becaufe he doth
. not flicwc forth in them the mightier grace , which he wantcth not
jf he would Pile we it forth.
z Thefe fayinges in deede fliould be fufficient for the godly and
fobrr,& them which remebre themfelues to be men. But forafmuch
as thefe vcnemousdogges do caft vp not onely one fort ofvenimc
againft God, we will as the matter (hall ferue, aunfwer to eucry one
particularly. FooliiLe men do diuers wayes quarell with God, as
though they had him fubied to their accufations.Firft therforc they
af kc , by what right the Lorde is angry with his creatures, of whomc
he
!:i:ii€ grace. oiv>nriii. JL.10.5. 3^5
lit bath not bene fiift prouokcd by ijny oSencc ; for lo condemnc to
<ieftrMc%n v/hom he wil],agreeth rathet with the wilfulncfle of a ty-
r^n^jihAQfhe lawefull femcrne of a iudgc. Therefore ihcy fay that
there is caufe why men should charge God, if by his bare will, with-?
piK thf »rpwne dcfcruing , they be predcftinate to eternall death. If
fuch jh.o*itihts do at ar^y time come into the mindc of the godly , rq
1>ieake their violent afifaultes they {halbe fiifEcicmly armed with this
fJehough they hadno morc,if they confidei how great wickedneffe
it isjcuen (0 much as to erxquirc of the caufcs of the will of God:(ith
of all things char are, it is the caufcjand worthily fo ought to be. For THs is
if it hauc nny caulc^then (omevvhat muft go b^efore it,wherto it mtft ^^'^^'^
be as It were bound : which it is vnlawfull ones to imagine. For, the ^^^.gy,
.will of God is fo the highcflrule cfiighteoufnes,thatwhatfoeuer he ft.n.li.i.
wilkth,eiien for this that he willtth it.it ought to be take for righte- dc Gen,
pus , . When therefore it is af kcd , why the"Lorde did u : it is to be ^""^.
Bunfwcredjbecaufe he willed it.Biit if thou go further in afking why "^^J ,^*
he willed it,thou af keft feme greater and hier thing than the will of
God : which can not be found. Let therefore the raihncife of man
reftraine it fclfe, and not feke that which is not, leaft paraduenturc it
may not finde that which is. With this biidls (I fay ) he fhalbc well
*vithholdcn whofoeuer he be that will difpute of the lecrets of God
.With reuerence.As for the boldenefie of the wicked,which drcde not
openly to fpeakecuell of Godiagainft it the Lorde with hisownc
righteoufncfie, without any our defcnfe fliall fufhcietly defend him-
lelfc, when he fliall take all {hifring from their confciences, and hold
them faft conuinced,and condenmc them.Neither do we yet thruft
in the fained deuife of abtolute power , which as it is prophane , fo
worthily ought 10 be abhorred of vs. We faine not God lawelefle,
who IS alawe to himfelfe:bccaufe(as Plato faith) menlbndin needc
oflawesjwho are troubled with vnlawfull iuftcs:but the will of God
isnotonel/pure from all fault,but alfois the hieft rule of perfedio,
yea and thclaweof alllawes.But we denie that he isfiibiedtoyelde
accompt. We dcnie alfo that we are mete iud^es, which would pro-
noucc of this caufe after cur owne fenfe. Wherefore if we attempt
further than we lawefuljy may, let that threatening of the Plalmc pfa,5i.
bring vs in fearc , that God fliall ouerconic fo oft as he is iudgcd of tf.
any mortal! man.
5 So can God in kepihg filencc, put his enemies to filencc. But,
that \vc may not fuffer them freely to fcorne his holy narrc , he dc-
liucreth to vs out of his word weapons againft them. Wherefore if
any man aiTaiic vs-wiih fuch wordes;why Gpd hath from the begin-
DbD
Cap.23. ^i the mailer howto fcceiuc
hing predeftinate fome to death , which when they were not , could
hot yet defdruc the iudgement of death: we in fteede of aunfwcr may
againe on otir fide afke of them , what they thinke that God owcth
to minjif he will iudge him by his ownc nature. In fuch fort as we be
all corrupted with finne , we can not but be haiefull to God : 6c that
hot by tirannous crueltie,but by moft vpright reafon of iufticc. If all
they whom the Lord doth predcftinate to death , are by the cftate of
nature fubicft to the iudgemem of death : of what vniuftice againft
ihcmfelaes, T befechc you, may they complaine ? Let all the fonncs
of Adam come ; Let them ftriue and difpyte with their creator , for
that by his cternall prouidence they were before their generation
condemned to euerlafting miferie. What {hall ihey be able ones to
murter againft this defcnfcjwhe God on the other fide (hall call them
to reknowledging of themfelues? If they be all take out of a corrupt
malTcit is no m aruell if they be fubied to damnation. Let them not
therefore accufe God of vnfufticc , if by his cternall iudgement they
be apomtcd to death,to which they themfelues do fele whether they
will or nojthat they are willingly led of their owne nature. Whereby
appereth howe wrongfull is the defire of their murmuring , becaufc
they do of fet purpofe hide the caufe of damnation which they arc
copelled to acknowledge in themfelues, that the laying of the blame
vpon God may acqmte thcm.But though I do a hundred times con-
fcfle, as it is moft true, that God is the author of it , yet they do not
by and by wipe away the gihineffe which being cngrauen in their
cofcieces from rime with oft recourfe,prefenteth it felfe to their eyes.
4 Againe they except and faytwere they not before predeflinatc
by the ordinance of God to the fame corruption which is nowe
alleaged for the caufe of damnation ? When therefore they pcriih
in their corruption,they do nothing but fuffer the puniftiment of that
miferie into which by his predeftmation Adam fell and drewe his
pofteritie hedlong with him. Is not he therefore vniuft , which doth
fo cruelly mocke his creatures. I grauntin decde that all the children
of Adam fell by the will of God into that miferie of ftate wherin
they be nowe bound : and this is it that I faid at the beginning , that
at length wemuft alway rcturne ro the determination of the will of
God, the caufe whereof is hidden in himfclfc. But k followeth not
byandby that God is fubicd to tiiis fclaunder.For we will with Paulc
aunfwer them in this maner , O man , what art thou that conrendeft
^om.p. ^jjj^ QqJ 5 JqjI^ jj^g jj^jj,^ formed fay to him that formed it , Why
haft thou formed me fo ? Hath not the potter power to make of the
fame lumpe one veflel to hQnor,and an other to diftionor>They vvill
^'^•'-V ' fay
The grace of Chrifl:. Lib.3. 394
fay thatthc righttoufnelTe of God is (o not trucly cicfended,but that
we fekc a {hifc.fuch as they are wont to haue that want a iuft excufc.
For what els fcemcth here to be faid , than that God hath a power
which can not be hindered from doing any thinti whatfoeutr it be as
he will himfclfe ? But it is farre otherwifc. For, what flronger rcafon
can be brought than when we are cominaunded to thinkewhata
one God is?For howe (liould he commit any vniuftice, which is iudgc
of the world? If it properly peneinc to the nature of God to do
iudgementj then he naturally loucth righteoufnelfe , and abhorreth
vnrighreourncfle. Wherefore the Apoflic did not, as though he were
ouertakcn , loke about for holes to hide him ; but (hewed that the
reafon ot the righteoufnefle of God is hicr than that it either is ro
be meafurcd by the meafure of man , or may be comprehended by
the fclender capacitic of the wit of man. The A poftle in deede con-
feficch that there is fuch depth in the iudgcments of God,\vhcrewLth
the mindes of men iLould be f»valowcd, if they endcuored to pcarce
into it. But he teacheth alfo howe hainous wrong it is , to binde the
workes of God to fuch a lawe , that fo fone as we vnderftand not the
reafon of them , we may be bold to difalowe them. It is a knowcn
faying of Salomon(which yet fewc do rightly vnderftand) The great Pro. i6,
creator of ail rcndreth reward to the foolcj and reward to tranfgicf- *^*
fors.For he cricth out concerninge the greatnelTe of God : in whofc
will it is to punifh fooles & tranfgrcflorSjalthough he do not vouchc-
faue to lee them haue his Spirit. And monftruous is the madnefle of
men,whe they fo couet to make that which is vnmeafurablc, fubicd
to the fmal meafure of their reafon.The Angels which ftoode ftil in
their vprightnefTejPaule calleth cled. If their ftedfaftnes wasgroun- » Tim.
ded vpon the good pleafurcof God, the falling away of the other 5***
proueth that they were forf3ken:Of which thing there can no orhcr
caufebe alleged than reprobation, which is hidden in the fccrci
counfellof God.
5 Go to:let there nowc be prcfcnt fomc Manichcc,or Celefline,
a fclaunderer of the prouidcnce of God : I fay with Paule that there
ought no reafon to be rendrcd thereof : becaufe with the grcaintfTc
of it,it farre furmounteth our vnderftanding.What maruell? or what
abfurditieisit?Would he haue the power of God fo limited, that ic
maybe able toworkenomore,th3nhi$minde is able toconceiue?
I fay with Auguftine,that they are created of y Lord,whom he with-
out doutingforeknewe that they (houldgo into deftrudtion:andthac
it was fo done, becaufe he fo willed : but why he willed, it is ngt our
pare to af Le a reafon of it, who can notcomprehrnd u: neuher iiic
DDD ij
Cap,2 3 . Of the maner how to receiue
mete that the will of God lliould come downc into controuerffe
amon^ vs, of which fo oft as mention is made, vnder the name of it
is named the hieft rule of righteoufnefTe.Why therefore is any c^uc-
ftion moucd of vnnghteoufnefle where righteoufnefl'c clerdy ap-
pcreth.f" Neithtr let vs be a(hamed, after the example of Paule,fo to
ftoppe the mouthes of the wicked , and from time to time fo oft as
they Ihalbc bold to barke againft it, to repete this, Who be ye mife-
tablc men, that lay an accufation to Gods charge , and do therefore
lay itio his charge becaufe he doth not temper the greamefle of his
workes to your dulnefle ? As though they were therefore wrongfull,
becaufe iheyare hidden from flelh. The vnmeafurablenciTeof the
iudgcrhentcs of God is by cleare experiences knowen vnro you. Yc
Pfa. 36. knowethat they are called the depc bottomlefle depth. Nowc afkc
of the narrowe capacities of your wit, whether they comprehend
that which God hath decreed with himfelfe.What good doth it you
therefore with mad fearching to plunge your felues into the bottom-
lefle depth i which rcafon it fclfc teacheth you that it (halbe to your
dcftrudion f Why are ye not at the leaft retrained with fome fearc
of that which both the biftorie of lob and the bookes of the Pro-
phets do report of the incomprehenfible wifcdomejand terrible
power of God. If thy rainde be vnquieted, let it not greue thee to
Auguft. embrace the counfellof Auguftine, Thou bcingamanlokeft for an
dcverb. aunfwerat my hand:andl alfo am aman.Therforelet vs both hearc
apoiio. j^jjj^ j.}^g, ^- jj^ . Q nian,what art thou? Better is a faiihfull ignorance
jQ^ * than rafli knowledge, Sekc merites:thou fhaltfinde nothing but
peine. O depth. Peter dcnietbthe Thefe beleueth;0 depth. Sekcft
thou a reafon? I wjli treble at the depth.Reafon thou, I will wonder:
difpnte thou.l will beleue:! fee depth,but I rcache not the bottomc.
Paul reftedjbccaufe he found wondering.He calleth the iudgcmcnts
of God vnfcarchable : and art thou come to fearche them ? He faith
that his wiyes are impofl'ible to be traced out : and docft thou trace
them? with proceding further we ihall nothing profit: For neither
we lliall fatisfie their way wanton curioufneffcjncithcr doth the Lord
necdc any other dcfenfe.rhan which he hath vfed by his Spirit,
wl'ich fpakc by the mouth of Paule : and we forget to fpeake well,
when we cefle to fpeake with God.
6 Their other obiedion alfo arifeth out of vngodlirtefle, which
yet tedeth not fo dircdiy to the acculing of God as tothe excufing
of the (inner. Howcbeit the (inner which is condemned of God can
not be iuftined without diflionorof the iudge. Thus therefore pro-
phane tongs do barkc againlt God, faying : why (hould God impute
thofc
The grace of Chrift. Lib. 3, 3py
thofc things for finne to men,whereof he hath by bis predeftinaiion
hycd neccmtie vpon men ? For , what fhould they do ? Should they
wraftle with his decrees ? But foihould they do it in vaine , fith they
can not do it at all. Therefore they are not rightfully pumihed for
thofe things ,wherof the chefc caufe is in Gods prcdeftinatJon.HcTC
I will abfteine from that dcfenfe,wherunto the Ecclefiaftical writers
do commonly flee, namely that the foreknowledge of God withfta-
dcth not but that man may be accompted the (inner : becauie God
forcfeerh the cuels of manjnot his owne.For fo the cauillatio would
notftay here, but will rather prelTe vs further with faying that God
might if he had would,haue prouided remedie for thofe euds which
he forefawrand that (ich he hath not fo donejhe hath of determined
purpofc created men to that endc that he fhould fo behaue himftlf
m earth : and if by the prouidence of God, man was created to this
condition, that he fhould do all thofe things that he doth : then he is
not to be blamed for that which he can not auoide, & which he en-
terprifcd by the will of God.Therfore let vs fee how this knot ought
to be well loofed.Firft of all this ought to be holdencertaine among
all men which Salomon faith , that God hath created all things for Pro.itf.
himfelf,& the wicked man to an euelday.Beholdjwhen the difpifing 4.
of all things is in the hand of God,when in his power remaincth the
rule of fafctie and death : he fo ordercth them by his counfell and
beckc , that among men there are borne fome adiudged euen from
their mothers wombe to death , which with their deftrudion may
glorifie his name.If any man anfwerjthat there is no neceffitie layed
vpon them by the prouidcce of Godjbut rather that he created them
infuch eftate , becaufe he forefawe their peruerfnefle to come: he
neither faith nothing at alljnor altogether. The old writers arc wont
in deede fomtimes to vfc this folution : but as it were doubtingly.But
the Scholeihcn reft vpon it, as though nothing could be obieded
. againft it.In dede I wii wiUingly graunt,y foreknowledge alone brin-
geth no ncceflitie to creatures, although all men do not fo agree : fot
there be fome that will hauc it alfo to be the caufe of things. But it
feemeth to me that Valla , a man ocherwife not much pradifed in
holy writingeSjfaw both more depely & more wifely, which (hewed
that this contention is fuperfluous : becaufe both life and death arc
rather the doings of Gods will thar> of his foreknowledge. If God
did butforefee the fuccelTes of men, & did not alfo difpofe and order
them by his will, then this queflion (hould not without caufe be
moued , whether his foicfeing any thing auailcd to the nece(ritie of
them>But (ith he doth none otherwifc forfee the things y (hall come
DDD iij
Cap.ij. Of the maner how to receiiic
to pafle , than becaufe he hath decreed that they fliould fo come to
paflfe : it is vainc to moue controucrfie about foreknowledgc,wherc
it is certaine that all things do happen rather by ordinance and com-*
maundctnent.
7 They fay that this is not written in cxprefTe words, that it was
decreed of God , that Adam (hould periili by his falhng away. As
though the fame God,whomc the Scriprure reporteth to do what •
foeucr he will,created the nobleft of allhis creatures to an vncertaine
cnde. They fay he had freewill, that he might ihapc to himfeJfe his
owne fortune ; and that God decreed nothin _',but to hnndlc him ac- j
cording to his deferuing.If fo cold a deuiic be recciued,where llialbc
that almightines of God,wherby he gouerneth all things according
to his fecret counfcll , which hangeth vpon none other thing than ic
felfe? But predelhnation, whether they will or no, iheweth himfelfc
in Adams pofkeritie. For it came not to paflTe naturally that all men
fliould lofe faiuation by the fault of one pdiccWhat hindereth them
to confefTe of one man, that which agamft their wiHcs they confeile
of nil m^inkinde* For why (hould they lofe their labour with dallying
fliiftcs? The Scripture cricrh out that all men were in the perfone of
one man made bondc to eternal! death, Sith this can not be imputed
to nature , it is plaine that it preceded from the wonderous counfell
of God But it is to muchabfurditierhnt thefe good Patroncs of the
righteoufneffe of God do foftumble at a ftr v-ve,;md Icapeouer great
beames. Agaj'ne lafkc : howecame it to paire,that the fail of Adam
did wrappe vp in eternall death fo many natios with ihcir children
being infantes without remedicbut becaufe it fo pleafed God?Hcrc
their tongues which areothcrwife fo pr^^tbng, muft ofncceflltie be
dumme. It is a terrible decree, I graunr ^ytt no man thalbe able to
denie , but that God forekncwe what ende man (hould haue , ere he
created him, and therefore foreknewe it bycaufe he haJ'fo ordcined
by his decree. Ifanym.mhere inuey agnin(^the foreknowledge of
Godjheralhly and vndifcretely liumbleth For, what matter is there,
I bcfech you , why the heauenly iudge lliould be accufed for that he
was not ignorant of that which was to come? Therefore if there be
any either iufte/^r colorable complaint , it toucheth prcdeftination.
Neither ought ic to ferue an abfurdity which I fay,that God forefaw
not onely the frdl of the firft man, and in him the ruine of his pofte-
rity,but alfo difpofed it after his owne wil. For as it bclongcth to his
wifedome,to foreknowc all things that flialbe ; Co it bclongcth to bis
Enchir. power , to rule and goucrnc all things with his hand. And rl.is que-
ad Lau. ftion Auguftinc very well difcuflfcth , as he doth other , faying : Wc
moil
The grace of Chrift, Lib. 3 , 39 6
moft holfomely confefle that which we moft rightly belcue,that the
God andLotdc of all things, which created all things very good,
and foreknewe that euell things (hould fpring out of good , and
krrewc thac it more perteined to his almighty goodncfle eucn of
cucli things do well , than not to fuffer them to be euell : that he Co
ordered the life of Angels and men , that in it he-might firft fhewc
what free will could do, and then what the benefit of his grace and
judgement of iullice could do.
'. i8 Here they runnc to the diftinftion of will and permiflion , by
ivhich they will hauc it graunted that the wicked do perifii , God
onely permitting but not wiUing it. But why fhould we fay that he
pcrmittethit,butbccaurehe fowilleth. Howebcitit is not likely,
thac man by himfelfe , by the onely permiffion of God, without any
his ordinace,brought deftrudioji to himfelfe : as though God apoin-
ted not , of what condition he woulde haue the chiefc of his crea-
tures to be, I therfore will not dout tocofefle fimply with Auguftine, ce cen.
that the wil of God is a neceffitie of things and that what he willeih, J^^'^"'
it muft of neceffitie come to pafle : as thofe things {hall truelly come ^3'',,^*^
to pafle which he hath forefeen. Nowe if for excufe of themfelues
and of the vngodlyjcither the Pelagias, or ManichecSjOr Anabapti-
^cs, or Epicureans (for with thefe fower fedcs we haue to do in this
queQion)(hall obied againft vs neceffitie wherewith they be bound
by the predeili nation of Godrthey bring nothing fit to the purpofc.
For ifpredcfiinationbe nothing elsbuta difpenfation ofrightcouf-
neflc ofGod, which IS hidden in deede, but yet without faulte: For
afmuch as it is certaine that they were not vnworthy to be prcdefti-
natc to that eftatc , it is alfo as certaine that the deftrudion is moft
righteous vv^hich they cntre into by predeftination . Moreoucr
their dcftrudion fo hangeth vpon the predeftination of God , thac
both caufe and matter thereof is founde in themfelues. For the firft
man fell , becaufe the Lordc fo iudged it to be expedient : why he fo
iudgedjis vnknowen to vs : yet it is certaine that he fo iudged for no
other reafon but becaufe he fawe that thereby the glorie of his name
fhould be worthily Ccc foith. When thout heareft mention of the
glorie of God, there thinke of his righteoufnes:For it muft be righte-
ous that deferueth praife . Man therefore falleth , the prouidcnce
of God fo ordeininge it : but he falleth by his owne fault.The Lordc
had ahtlc before pronouccd,that all ihe things which he had made
were very good. Whcnfe therefore commeth that perucrfnefle to ^cn.i,
man , to fall away from his God ? Leaft it (hould be thought to be ^**
of creation , the Lordc with his commendation allowed chat which
PDD iiij
Cap.23. ^Ofthemariei^howtorccciuc
came from himfclfe. Therefore by hisowne euelneflfe he cbrruptc<!
the nature which he had receiued pnre of the Lorde , aiid, by his
fall he drewe hi* wh]Dle pofteritic with hira into dcftrudion. Where-
fore let vs rather bcholde an euident caiife of damnation in the cor^
rupred nature of mankmde , which is ncrer to vs , than fearch for a
hidden and vtterly incomprchenfible caufc.theteaf in the piedefti*
nation or'G<><l. Neither let it greue vs fo faw-e to fubmit our wit to
the vnmeafiirable wifdome of God, that it may ycld in many fecrets
6f his. Fofjof tliofe things which it is ucuhergrauntednoc lawefull
to knowe, the ignorance is well iearxicd : the coueting of knowledge^
is a kinde of madnefTc. .'i-iotrjuc
9 Some man parhappes will fxy : that I haiic not yet brought
enough to fabduc that wicked excule.But I rerily contcfle thatit can
ncuer be brought to paiTc , but that vngodlinelle will alway grudge
and murmure againft it : yet I thinkc that I haue fpt-ken fo . much as
might fuffice to take away not Oiiely all realoabut alfo all colour of
gainefaying. The reprobate would be thought'Cxcufable inlinrungj
becaufe they can not efcape thcnecefficie of iinnin^^cfpecially lidi
fuch neceflitie is caft vpon them by the ordinance of God. But wc
denicthac theyare thereby v/ ell excufed , becaufe the ordinance of
Godjby which they complaine that they are deftinate to deftruftion,
hath his rightcoufneflej vnknowen m dcede to vs, but yet moft cer-
taine.Whcrupon wc conclude,that they b are no euel which is not
laycd vpon them by the moft righteous iudgemcnt of God Thcn,wc
leach that they do ouerthvvartly,whicb to feke out the beyinnin'^ of
their damnat«on,do bend their eyes to the fccret dofets to the counr
fell of God,and vvinke at the corruption of ruiture,fom whenfc their
damnation fpringeth. And this withllandcih that they can not im^
pute ic to God , for that he witnefTeth of his ownc creation. For al-
though man is creat by the eiernall prouidence of God to that cala-
mine , whereumo he is fubicd : yet the matter thereof he tooke of
himfclfe,not of God ; forafmuch as he is by no other mcane fo loft,
but becaufe he wente out of kmde from the pure creation of God
into a corrupt and vnpure perucrfneife.
10 Nowe the aduerfaries of Gods predcftination do fclandcr it
alfo with a ihirdabfurditie-Forwhcn we impute it to nothing els but
to the choife of the will of God, y t^hey are made free from the vni-
uerfall deftru(ftion,whom he maketh heires of his kingdome,thereby
they gather that there is with him accepting of perfones , which the
Scripture eucry where dcnicth;& therfore , that cither; the Scripture
dlfagrccth with it fclf,or that in the cledio of God there is refped of
defer-
- The grace of Chrift. Lib.j, 5^7
dcfcruings.Firttjche Scripture in an other fenfe Qcnieth,that God is
an accepter of perfones , thanas they iudgeit. For by the name ojf
Perfonjit lignifieth not a man,but thofe thin.^cs which bcinge fcenc
with eics in man arc wont to procure cither fauour, grace, and di-
gnity.or hati ed,comcmpt,and Ihame : as,richcfle,we3lth,powcr,no-
bihtyjofficCjCountrey, excellency of beauty ,and (uch other : on the
other fide pouerty, nccdc, bafeneire,vilenefle,contcmpt,and fuch o-
ther. So Peter and Paul do teach that the Lord is not an accepter of _
perfoneSjbecaufe he putteth not difference betwene the lew & the , . ' ***
Grecian,to rcfufetheoneand embrace the other for only refpedof Kom.j.
nation.So lames vfcth the fame words when he mindeth to nffirme, 'o-
that God in his iudgcment nothing regardfeth richelfe. But Paule m ^ ^* ^
an other place fpeaketh thus ofGod,thatiniudginghehathnocon- y^^ ^ -
lideration of freedome or bondage.Wherctorc there ihalbe no con- Colo. 3,
trariety if we (hall fay that God accordinge to the will of his good ^ >•
pleafure without any deferuinge choofeth to his fonnes whome he ^P*^*^-^*
vvjll,reicdinge and 1 cfuljng<^ other. But the matter may thus be ope- '*
ncd.that men may be more fully fatisHed. They askehosveic com* .
meth to paiTe, that of two betwene whom no deferuinge putteth a-
ny difference , God in his eledinge palkch ouer the one and t.}keth
the other. I on the other fide do aske them,wheiher they thinkc that
in him that is taken there is any thini^e chat may make the mindi of
God to encline toward him- If they conrcire(as ihey nedcs muff) that
there IS nothtngjit ihall follow that God looketh not vpon man, but
from hisownc goodneffc fetchcth acaufe whytodojiood tohitn.
VVhcras therfore God clioofcth one man,refufing an otber,tbis c6^ Aug.ad
meth not of refped of man,but of his mercy alone , which ought to Boiiif.
haue liberty to ffiew forth and vtter it Cclh where and when it pica- ''• *• ^^
fcih him. For we haue in an other place alfo ihewcdjthat there were ^'^
not fro the beginninge many called noble,or wife,or honorable,thac 3,$,
God might humble the pride of fleffi : fo farre is it of, that his fauour
was bound to perfones. -
ti Wherefore many do falfely and wickedly accufc God of par*,
tiall vnrighteoufneffejfor that he doth not in his predefliination kepc
one felfe courle toward all men.H^ay they) he findc all giliy,let him
cgally puniffi all: if he finde them vngilty,let him withholdc the ric;or
of his iudgemet from all. But fo they deaic with him,as if either mer-
cy were forbidden him, or whe he would haue mercy he be compel-
led altogether to giue ouer his iudgemet. What is it that they requires
if all be gilty,thatall may together fufter al one paine.We graunt the
giltineflc to be common, but we fay that the mercy of God hclpcih
Cap.2 3 . Of the maner how to rcceiue
fome. Let it help all, fay they. But we anrwcrc>that it is rightfull that
he iliould alfo in punifliinge (hewe himfclfc a rightfull iudge.When
ihcy fufter not this : what do they elfe but either go about to fpoylc
God of his power to haue mercy , or at Icaft to graunt it him vppon
this condition , that he vtterly giue oucr his Judgement. Wherefore
Epift ihcfe fayingesof Auguftincdo very well agree together . Sithin
'"*^^ ft the firtt man the whole mafle of mankinde fell into condemnation,
& erat. '^^^^ veflch that are made of it to honor,are not the veffels of their
owne nghteoufneflc, but of the mercy of God:& whereas other are
made to difhonor , the fame is not to be imputed to vnrighcfulnciTc
De bo but to iudgemcnt &c ; That to thofe whom he refufeth , God ren-
perfeu. dereth due painc : to thofe whom he calleth,hc giueth vnderfcrued
caj>.»». grace : that they are deliuered from all accufation, after the manner
of a creditor,in whofe power it is,to foi"giue to the one, and aske of
the other.Thereforc the Lord alfb may giuc grace to whom he will,
becaufe he is mercifult : & giue it not to all,bccaufe he is a iuft iudge.
He may by g'uing to fome,that which they do not defcrue, fhev/ hii
free grace : and by not giuinge to i\\ , declare what all defcrue. Fot
Rom 1 1 whcras Paul writeth that God cnclofed all vnder Hnne^that he might
1 1. haue mercy vpon all , it is therewithall to be added that he is dettoc
to no man : becaufe no man firftgauc to him, that he may require
like of him.
1 1 This alfo they often fay , to ouerthrowc predeftination, that
while itftandethjallcarcfulncfle and endeuour of welldoing falleih
away. For who (fay they) fhall hearc that either hfe or death is cer-
tainely appointed for him by the cternall decree of God, but that it
will byandby come into his minde that it maketh no matter how he
behauc himfelfejiiih the predeftination of God can by his workc be
nothinge hindered or furthered ? So (hall all men diiToluiely throw
foorththemfelues,and after a defperate manner runne headelongc
whether their Iuft (hal cary them. And verily they fay not altogether
falfciy,for there be many fwine, which with filthy blafphemies defile
thedoflrine of predeftination,and by this pretenfc alfo do mocke out
all admonillimenies and rebukinges,fayingc, God knoweth what he
hath ones determined to do with vs:if he haue decreed our faluatio,
he will bring vs to it at the time appointed : if he haue predcftinatc
our deatbjwe (houldc trauaile in vainc to the contrary.But the Scrip-
turc,when it teacheth wiih how much greater reuerence and rcligi-
oufneife we ought tothinke of fo great a miftery,doth both inftruft
the godly to farre other fenfe,and well confute thefe mens outrage.
For it doth not fpeake of prcdclunaiio to this cnd,tliat wc fliould be
encouraged
The grace of Ch rift. Lib.3. 39^
encouraged to boldneffe , and with vnlawfuli raHjenclTe attempt to
fearch the vnartaiacd fetrctcsof God : but rather chat being hum-
bled and abaced we fliouid icarne to tremble at his iudgemc: ii,& re-
uerently to loolce vp to his merry.To this maike the fajtntull wil Ic-
ueli therafelues. As for that filthy gronitige of fwine » ins well con-
fiitcd of Paule. They fay that they go carclefly forward in vices;be-
caufc if they be of the number of the eled, iheir vices (hall nothingc
hinder them,buc that they ilull at length be brought tohfe.But Paul EpH.1.4
ttlleth that we be to this end, that we ihould lead a holy & fauhleffc
hfc. If the marke that eledion is direded vnto be holineffe of Ijfc,
it ought more to awake & fturre vs vp chcrefuUy to pradifc that ho-
lincfle,than to ferue fora clokingc of flothfulnefTe.For howe greatly
do thcfc thinges differ the one from the other : to ceafTc from well
doingjbecaufe eledionfufticech to faluationiand that the appointed ^
cnde of cledionisthac we fhouldc apply our feluestothe endeuour
of good doings. Away therforc with fuch facrileges which do wrong-
fully mifturne the whole order of election. Where they ftretch their
blafphcmies further, when they fay that he which is reprobate of
God , (hallloofc his labour if he go about to make himCelfe allowc-
able tohim withinnoccncy &honefty oflifetherin they are taken
with amoft lliameleflc lye. Forjwhenfe coulde fuch endeuour come
but of eledion ? For whofoeuer be of the number of the reprobate,
as they arc veffels made to didionor/o they ceafie not wirh continu-
all wicked doinges to piouokethe wrath of God aijainft themfeluej,
and by euident tokens to confirme the iudgement of God which is
already pronounced vpon them: fo farr^ be they from ftriuinge with
him in vainc.
I g But other do malicioufly & fhamefully fclaundcr this dcdrlne
as though it did oucrthrovve all exhortations to godly liuinge. For
which matter in olde time Auguftine was burdened with a great ma-
lice. Whichhc wiped away with his booke of correption and Grace
wrytten to Valentine , the readingc whereof will appeafc all Godly
Ttnd tra(3ablc men : yet I will touch 3 fewe thinges,which(as t truft)
fhall fatisfie them that be honeft and not contentious . We haue al-
ready fcene how open and loude a preacher of the free eleftion Paul
wa$:vvas he therefore cold in admonilhing and exhorting? Let thefe
good zealous men compare their earncftncfTe with his, and it fhalbe
found in them ife in comparifon of his incredible heatc. And truely
this principle taketh away all doutSjthat we are not called to vnclen- ._.,
neflc , but that euery man (hould poffelTc his vciTell in honor, &c. A- 4.7, ^ *
gaine > chat we arc the handy worke of God created to good woikes-
Cap.i 3 . Of the maner how to receiuc
'h«.3. which he hath prepared that we ihoulde walke in them. Summarily^
they that arc cuen but meanly excrcifed in Paul, iliall without ionge
declaration cafily perceiue how fitly he makcth thefc things to agree,
which they fainc to difagree. Chriit commaundeth that men beleue
in him ; Yet is hisdefinuiue fentence neither falfe nor contrary to
hn.6. this commaundemcnt, where he fayth.Nomancan come to me,bue
he to whom It is giuen of my father. Let preachinge therefore haue
his courfe, which may bringe men to f3ith,and with continuall profi-
ting holdc them faft in perfeuerance. Neither yet let the knowledge
of predeltination be hmdercd,y they which obey may not be proud
as of their ownc,bot may glory in the Lord. Chrift not for nothing
at 1 3 faytbjWho fo hath cares of hearinge, let him heare.Therforc when
we exhortc and preach.they that haue eares do willingely obey : buc
f" .' ^ who fo lacke cares , in them is fulfilled that which is wrytten , That
3no hearing they hearc not.But why (feith Auguftine){hould fome haue,
;rf€n. and other not haue ? Who hath knowe the minde of the LordPMuft
'P-» 5 • that therefore be denied which is open , becaufc that can not be c6-
prehended which is hidden?Thefe fayinges I haue faithfully repor-
ted out of Auguftinerbutbecaufe paraducnture his wordesllial haue
more authority than mine, go to,let vs bringe forth the very wordes
that are read in himfelfe. If when this is heard, many are turned into
dulneflc & flugqifhneflc, and beinge enclined from labour to luft do
go after their defires : oughtthat therefore to be accompted falfe
which is fpoken of the foreknowledge of God?If God haue forekno-
wen that they (halbc good,{hall they not be good,in how great euil-
ntflc focuct they now hue ? and if he haue foreknowcn that they will
be euill,(hall they not be euill, in how great goodnefl'e foeuer they be
now feene ? Shall therefore thofe thinges which are truely fpoken of
the foreknowledge of God, be for fuch caufes either to be denied
or to be lefte vnfpoken of ? namely then when if they be not fpo-
'ap.i5 ken of,mcn go into errours ? The rule (fayth he) to keepe trueth vn-
fpoken ofjis one thinge,& the necelTity to fpeake trueth is an other.
As for the caufes of leauinge trueth vnfpoken, it were Ionge to
fearch them outall : of which yet this is one, that they be not made
worfe which vnderftandc it not, while we meane to make them more
learned that vndcrftand it, who when we fpeake any fuch thing are in
dede not made more le3rned,nor yet are made worfe.But when a true
thing is in fuch cafcjthat whe we fpeake it,he is made worfe that can
not conceiue it:and when we fpeake it not,he is made worfe that can
conceiue itrwhat thinke we now to be done ? is notthe trueth rather
to befpokcjihat he may conceiue it,that can coceiue if.than to kepc
it
The grace ojfChrift. Lib.3. 3^^
ft vnfpokcn, that not only neither of them may concciue it,but air6
he that more vnderftadeth may be the worfes'wheras if he did hcarc
and concciue it, by him alfo many fhouldc learne ? And we wiU not
fay that which, as the Scripture witnefleth, we lawfully might hauc
fpoken. For we fearc forfooth leaft when we fpcake, he be offended
that can not conceiue it : but we feare not leaft while we holde our
peace, he that can concdae trueth be decciued with faUhode.Which
fentencc he at the iaft fliortly knitting vp,more plainely alfo confir-
meih. Wherefore if the Apoftlcs,and thry which followed ihem,thc
doctors of the church did both.namely both sodhly preach of the Ci*
ternall eledion of God,and hold the faithfiili in awe vndcr the difci^-
pline of Godly life: why do thcfe our aduerfarics being confuted with
inuincible violence of trueth, thinkc that they fay well in faymg thac
that which is fpoken of prcdeftination is not to be preached to the
people although it betrue. Yea it muft in any wife be preached.v he
which hath eares to heare may hearc. But who hath eares if he hauc
not receiued the from him y promifcth tliat he wd giue them?Truew
ly let him that rccciucth not,refufe it:fo that yet he which receiueth
itjdo take & drinke,do drinke and hue.For ais godhnes is to be prca-
chedjthat God may be rightly worfliippcd:fo is alfo predcftination,
that he which hath eares to heare of the grace of God,may glory m
God and not in himfelfe.
14 And yet that holy man , as he had a fingular defire to edifie, Co
tcmpereththc maner of teaching the trueth, that offenfe be wifely a-
uoided fo far as it lawfully may be.For he fheweth that thofe thinges
which are trucly fayd ,may alfo be conueniently fayd. If any man do
thus preach to the people. 1 f ye bcleue not, y caufe is for that ye arc
already prcdeftinate of God todeftrudion:fuch a man doth not only
cherifh flothfulnelTcbut alfo maintaine wickednelTe.If any man alio
ftretch his faying to the time to come,and fay that they which hcarc
(hall not belcue, becaufe they arc reprobate: this {halbc rather a cur-
ling than a teaching. Such therefore Auguftine not vnworthily bid-
deth to depart from the Church,as fochfh teachers,and vnlucky and
jll prophecying Prophetcs.In an other place he trucly affirmeth thac
,it IS to be holden that a man then profiteth with rebukinge,when he
hath mercy and helpeth which maketh to profit whom he will, euen
.without rebukingc. Bu t why fome thus , and fomc otherwife ^ God
forbid thatjthat we fhould fay that the power of ludging belogeth ra-
ther to the clay than to the potter. Againc afterward. When men by
rcbokmge either comcor returneinto the way of righteoufneffe,
who workethfaluation in their hearts but hcwhich when any whQ»
Cap.24- Ofthemanerhowtorecciuc
foeuer he be planteth and watercth,giuech tbe cnereafejwliomvvlicn
he will fauejno freewill of man rcfiftcih?Ic is therefore not to be dou-
t€«d that the wils of men can not refift the will of God(which botbin
'heauen and earth hath done whatfoeucr he wotiide,and which hath
blfo done thofe things that are to come)bilt that he may do what he
will/orafmuch' as cuen of the very wils of rrscn he doth what he wilL
Againe,whenhe will leadc me to himjdoth he binde them with cor-
porallbondes f He inwardly worketh,inwardly holdeih hearies,in-.
^ :wardly moucth hearts, &'draweth the with their wils which he him*
■felfe hath made in thcm.Butjthat which he byandby addcth ought in
no wife to be omitted i that becaufc we know not who bclongeth or
not belongeth to the number of the predeftinate , we ought fo to be
iafFedioned that we woulde all men to befaued . So (hall it come to
pafiejthat whomfoeuer we finde,we fhall trauailc to make him par-?
4aker of peace . Bm our peace (hall reft vpon the children of peace .
•Therforc for our part,we mu0 apply holfome & fliarp rebuking to ail
men like a medecine,ihat tlaey perillie not, nor dtftroy other, but it
ihalbc the worke ofGod to make it profitable to the whom he hatli
foreknowen and predeftinate.
The xxifi)^ Chapter.
Th4t tleSfion ujiabtished by the caUinge of God ; bttl that the reprobate (h
bring vpon tbemfelues the iufi defira£iienvvheref4nto
they are appointed
BVt, that the matter may more pijaincly appeare , we muft en-
treate both of the callinge of the eled,and of the blinding and
hardeninge of the wicked . Of the firft of thefe I haue ahea*
dyfpoken fomewhat, when I confuted their erroar , which
think that the generalnesofthe promifcs extedeth egally toal man-
kinde. But this eledixm which otherwife God hath hidden with
himfelfe he doth not without choifc at tength difdofc by his calling,
ora.?. which a man may therefore call the teftifyinge of it. For, whom he
9' hath foreknowen, them he hath alfo foreappoimed to be fashioned
like the image of his fonne : whom he hath foreappoimed , them he
hath alfo called ,• whom he hath called , them he hath alfo iuftified,
that m time to come he may glorifie them. When the Lorde hath by
cleding already adopted his mto the number of his children: yet wc
fee how they entre nor intopoffeftlon of fo great a bcnefit,but when
they be called:on the other lide,how being called they do now enioy
a certaine communicatinge of his cledion. For which rcafon Paulc
callcwh the Spirite which tlicy recciuc^boih the Spiricc of adoption,
and
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 400
md the fcalc, & carneft of the inheritance to comemamcly becaufc Ephcj.
it doth with the tcftimony thereof ftabhfh and fealc lo their heartcs * 3*
the affuredncfle of the adoptio to comc.For though the preaching of
the Gofpell fpring out of the fountaine of clcdi6:yet becaufeitis al«
fo common to the rcprobate,therforc it could not by it felfc be a furc
proofe thereof. But God effedually teacheth his dc6t , chat he may
bring them to faith:as we haue before alleaged out of the wordcs of
Chnft.Who fo is of God,hc & none other feeth the Father. Againe,!' loha 4,
haue fhcwed thy name to the men whom thou halt giucn me;Wher- 4^.
as he faith in an other placejNo man can come to me,vnleflc my Fa- ^°'^- *7»
ther drawc him.Which place Auguftine wifely vvcieth, whofe words io},„^ '
arc ihefc. If ( as Trueth fayth ) euery one that hath learned , com- ^4.'
mcth;whofocuercommeth not,ccrtainely neither hath he learncd.lt Lib.df
doth not therefore followe that he which can come , alfo commeth^ ^Z"^*' .
vnleffe he haue both willed & done it. But cucry one that hath lear- j. "
ned of the Father,not only can come,but alfo commeth, when nowe Pehg.
there is prclcnt both the profit of comming,and the aftedion of wil- & Cjt«
Iinge,and the effed of doinge. Alfo in an other place more plainely. ^^^^- ca.
What is this clfe,Euery one that hath hcarde of the father, and hath 'jj* * ^'
learnedjCommeth to me,but there is none chat hearech and learneth j^u
of the father and commeth not to me fFor if euery one which hath (^n^
hearde of the father and learned > commeth : trucly cuery one that cap.t.
commeth not , hath not heard of the father , nor learned ; for if he
had heard and learned,he woulde come . This Ichoole is farre from
the fenfes of the fleftie , in which fchoole the father is heard and tea-
cheth,that men may come to the fonnc. And a litic aftcr.This grace
which is fecrctly giuen to the heartcs of men, is receiued of no hard
h carte : for it is therefore giuen,that the hardnefle of the heart may
firlt be taken away . When therefore the father is heard within , he
taketh away the ftony heart.and giueth a fleihly heart. For fo he ma- ' '
- keth the children of promife and veflels of mercy,whichhe hath pre-
pared to glory. Why therefore doth he not teach all,that they may
come to Chrift,but becaufe all whome he teacheth, by mercy he tea-
cheth : whom he doth not teach,by iudgcment he doth not tcache?
becaufe he hath mercy vppon whom he will, and hardencth whomc
he will. Therefore Godaffigncth them for children lohimfelfe,
and appointeth himfelfe father to them,whom he hath chofen.Now
by calling he bringeth them into his houfehold,and vniteth himfelfe
to them.that they may be one together.But, when Calling is ioyncd
to eledion , in that manner the Scripture fufficicntly fignifieih thas
in ic nochingcis to be required but the mercy of God.For if we askc>
Cap. 24. Of the maner howto rcceiue
whom he calleiih and for what reafon : he anfwcreth , whom he had
clcdcd.But when we come once to elecbon,therc the oncly mercy
Rom 5>. of God appeaieth on eucry fide. And here that faying of Paul truely.
1 6, hath place, 1 1 is not of him that willcth, nor of him that runneth,but
of God that hath mercy: Neither yet that fame fo as they common-^
ly take it,which part it betwene the grace of God, & the willing and
running of man. For they expound it,that the defire & endeuour of
man haue in deede no force of them(cJues,vnleire they be profpered
by the grace of God:hut when they arc holpen by Iiis blc{Iing,then
they affirmc that they haue alfo their partes in obtaininge faluation.
Enchir. Whofe cauiUation I had rather confute with Auguftines wordes tha
* P^"' mincowne : Ifthe Apoftlemeantnothiivieelfe butthatitisnotof
2 j^ ' ' him only that wiUeth or runneth , vnlcfle the Lordc be there prcfent
mercifall:we tnay contrariwife turnc itagainft them and fay that it is
not ofonly mercyjvnleife there be prefent willing and runninge.But
if this be openly wicked , let vs not dout that the Apoftle giucth all
to the mercy of the Lord,& leaueth nothinge to our willes or cndc*
uouiS.To this effcd fpcakcth that holy man. And I fet not a ftravv by
that nice futtelty>that they fay that Paule would not haue fo faid vn-
lefle there had bin Ibme endeuor & fomc wil in vs.For he did not c6-
fider what was in man: but when he faw that fomc did afllgnc part o(
Taluation to the endeuour of men,he limply condemned their errour
in the hrft parte of the fcntence, and in the fecond he chalcnged the
whole fummc of faluation of v mercy of God. And what other thinge
do the Propheies trauaile about , but continually to preach the free
calling of God .^
'2 Morouer the very nature alfo and difpenfation of Calling doth
cleaiely fliewe it, which confifteth not in the only preachinge of the
woidjbut alfo in the enlightning of the Spirit.To wiiom God ofFreth
Efa.oj . j^^ wordjis Ihew^d vs in the prophet: I am foud of them that fought
me not:I haue openly appeared to them that did not aske for me.To
a people which hath not called vpon my name I haue faydjLoc I am
prefent. And leaft the lewcs {hould thinke that this kindcnes belon*
ged only to the Gentiles,he doth alfo put them in remebrance from
Iho.24. whenfe he tookc their father Abraham, when he vouchfaued to ioine
3* him to himfelfeyDamely from mere idolatry, in which he was drow-
ned with all his. When he firft lliineth with the light of his worde to
men not deferuinj^e itjhe therein (heweth an example plaine enough
of his free goodnelle . Here therefore the vnmcafurable goodnes of
God (lie weth forth itfelf,butnotvntofaluatio to alhbecaufe for the
reprobate there abid«th a more grieuous iudgemcnt , for that they
rcfufc
The grace of Chrift. Lib.^ . 401
rcforcthctcftimony of the will of Go<i. And Godalfo, tofetfoorth
his glory, withdrawcth fiom them the cflfcduall force of his Spiritc.
Therefore this inward calling is a pledge of faluation, which can not
decciue vs.For which purpofe maketh that faying of John, Thereby i.ioh. j
Yfc know that wc are his children,by the Spirit which he hath giueh 14.
vs. And leaft flcfli fhould ulory, that ic did at the Icaft anfwere to him
when he called & of hisowne wiiloffred himfclfe,hc affirmcth that
it hath no earcs to hcare,no eics to fee,but which he hath madc.and
that he maketh them,notaccordingeto cucry mans thankefulncfTc,
but accordmg to his owne clcdion.Of which thingc vou hauc a no-
table example m Lukei where both Icwcs and Gentiles in common
together heard the preaching ofPaulc and Barnabas. Whereas they ASt, i j,
were at that time all taught v/ith one fclfe fame worde, it is fay d that «4'
they beleued which were ordained to cuerlaftinge life . With what
face may we deny that the Callinge is free, in which eucn to the very
laft part clcdion reigneth alone.
5 But here wc muft beware of two crrours : becaufe many make
man a worker together with God , that he by his confent may make
the elcdion to be offorccrfo by their opini6,rhe wil of man is aboue
the counfell of God. As though the Scripture did tcach,that it is only
giuen vs that we may bclcucand not rather faith it fclfc.Other fome,
although they do notfo weaken the grace of the holy Ghoft:yet be-
ing led by 1 wore not what refon, hang clcdion vpon faith as though
it were doutfull,yea & vncffeduall vntill it be confirmed by faith.It is
in deedecertainethat it is confirmed,3S toward vs : and we haue al-
ready (hewed that the fccrct counfcl of God bcginneth to lliinc out,
which was before hidden: fo that by this word you vnderftande no«
thingc elfejthan that it is approued which was vnknowen,and is as it
were fealed with a feale.But it is falfely fayd,that elcdion is then and
not till then effc(5ball,whcn we haue embraced the Gofpcll,and that
thereof It taketb liucly ftrength. Wc muft in decdc from thcnfe fetch
the certainty of it: Becaufe if wc attcpt to reach vnto the eternall or-
dinance ofGodjthatdecpc bottomlcffe depth wil fwallowvs vpBut
when God hath opened it vnto vs, we muft climbe vp hicr, leaft the
cffedlliould drownc the caufe.For what greater abfurdity or ihamc-
full vniufticc is there, than that when the Scripture teacheth that wc
arc enlightened as God hath chofen vs,our eyes (houlde be fo dafc-
led with this light, that they fhoulde rcfufe to looke vppon eledion >
Yet in the mcanc time I deny not , that to the ende we may be cer-
laine of our faluation.wc muft be^inne at the word, and that our affi-
ance ought therewith to be contented^ that wc may call vppon Qod
£££
Cap.24. Ofthernanerhowtorcceme
by the name of Fatlicr. For fomc cjuicc contrary to right order, that
they may be certified of the counfell of God ( which is neerc vnto
vsjin our mouth & in our heart ) do couct to flic aboue the cloudes.
)eu.3o Therefore that rafhnes is to be rcllrainedwith fobricty offaith,that
**• it may fufSce vs that God in his outwardc worde is a-witncfle of his
hidden grace' : to that the conduit pipe out of which there floweth
water largely for vs to drinkejdo not hinder but that the fptinghead
may haue his due honor.
4 Therfore as they do wrongfuUyjwhich hang the ftrength of e-
Icdion-vpon the faith of the gofpcl,by which faith wefeele thatcle-
dion pcrtaincth.to vs:fo we iTiall k^pe the beft order,if in feking the
certainty of our eledtion, we ftickc faft in thcfe later figncSjwhicn arc
fure witneffings of it.Satan doth with no tentation either more gric-
uoufly,or more dangcroufly aftonifh the faithfull,tha when difquic-
ting them with dout of their eledion, he doth alfo mouc them with
a pcruerfc dcfirc to feeke it out of the way. I cal it fecking out of the
way, when a Wretched man cmerprifeth to breakc into the hidden
fecretcs of thfe wifdom of God, ^nd topearcc cucn to the hieft etcr*
nity to vnderftand what is determined of himfelfe at the iudgemenc
feate of God. For then he throweth himfelfe headlong to be fwallo-
wed vp into the depth of the vnmeafurablc deuouringe pit: then he
wrappeth himfelfe with innumerable fnares and fuch as he can not
winde out of: then he ouerwhelmeth himfelfe with the bottomleffc
depth of blinde darkenefle.For fo is it rightful that the fooliflinefTc
of the wit of man be punifhed with fo horrible ruine,whcn he attep-
teth of his owne force to rife vp to the height of the wifdom of God.
And fo much more deadly is this tentation.as there is none to which
we are commonly all more bent.For there is moft rarely any man to
be found c, whofe minde is not fometime ftriken with this thought.
Whenfe haiUhou faluation , but of the cledion of God ? And of
Ecledion what reuelation haft thou f* which thought, if it haue ones
taken ^iaceiii 'any man, either perpetually vexcththe mifcrable
man.\wrh'tetriblc tormentcs ;, or vtterly difmayeth him . Truely I
would haue rioforer atgument than this experience to proue , howe
wrongefully fuch men imagine of predeftination.For the mmde can
l>e infcdcd with no errour more reftjlentjthan that which plucketh
downe'and thrutteth the conference from her peace and quietncffc
towarde God- Therefore if we feare ihipwrecke, we mtift diligently
beware of this rockc, which is ncuer fbriken vpon without deftru-
flioti. Arid though the difputinge ofpiedeftination be efteemed like
~« dangerpys'Sca^yct in paffinge through it there is found a fafe and
- - a quiet
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 402
quiet yea and pleafinc n3yl!ngc>vnlcl]c a man do wilfully couct to be
in dans^cr. For as they dodrowne chemfduco in the deadly bottom-
Icllc depth, which to be certified of rhcir ek dion do encjuire of the
fccrct CounfcU of GckI without his word : fo they which do righdy
and orderly fearche it in fuch forte as it is contained in the worde,
receiuc thereof a fingular frutc of comfort. Let this therfore be our
way to fcarch it, that we beginne at the calling-e of Godjand cndc in
the fame. Howebcit this wiihftandeth not, but thnt the faithfuJl may
thinkethat thebcnefitcs which they daily receiue at thehandeof
God,do dcfccnd from that fecretadoption:as they fay in Hfay,7hou e&.j^,
haft done marucls, thy thoughtcs are olde, true, and faithfull.'foraf-
muchas by that adoption asby a token.theLordes wilisro c5iirmc
fo much as is lav/fuU to be knowen of his counfell.But ieaft any mcrn
{hoiilde thinke this a weake teftimony,lct vs cofider how much both
clearcneflc and certainety it b; mgeth vs. Of which thinge Btrnarde
fpeaketh fitly. For after that he had fpoke of the reprobntc,he fiich;
The purpofeof God ftandeth,the CcJicence of peace ftandeth vpon
them that feare him, both couerifig their euilsjand rcwardingc their
good thingcs:fo as to them after a maruelous maner not crtiely good
thingeSjbut alfo euil do worke together vnto good. Who flial accuic
the cicdofGod?Itfuflficcth me t0 3l]rightcournef{e,tohaueh«m a-
lone merciful) to whom alone I hauc finned. Al that he hath decreed
not to impute to me, is fo asif itneuer had bin. Andaliile after: O
place of true reft,3nd to which not vnworthily I may glue the name
of a bedchamber,in which God is fecne not as troubled with w^-ath,
not as withholden with careibur his will is proued in him good, and
well plcafinge, and perfed.This fight doth not make afrayd,bui cal-
mcth : doth not ihrrc vp vnquiet curioufnefTejbut appeafeth ir:doth
not weary the fenfcs , but quietcth rhem.Heic is quiet truely taken.
God being appc3fed,appcafeth alkhingsiand to behold him cj»iet,i$
to be quiet.
.5 Firftifwe feckc a fatherly kindeneflfc and fauorablemindtof
God , we miift turne our eies to Cirrift , in whom alone the fbule of
the father rcfteth.Tfwe feeke faliiation,life5& the immortality of the |_ ^^'^'
hcauenly kingdome,we muft then alio fiee to no other :forafmuch
as he alone is both the fountayne of life , and author of faluation,
andheire of thekingdomeof Hciuen. Now whereto ferueth ele-
dion,but that being adopted of inc hcauenly Father into the dcgrc
of children , we may by his fauour obtaine faluation and immortali-
ty ? Howefbcuer in feekinge thou toffe it and (liake it, yet thou fhalc
finde that the vtiermoft markc of it exicndcth no further.Thereforc
EEE ij
Cap.24. Of the maner howtorecciiic
whom God hath taken to his childre.it is not faid that he hath cho-
plj.i.4 ^^^ them in themfelues , but in his Chrift;becaure he could not louc
them but in him, nor giue them the honor of the inheritance of his
kingdom , vnlcffe they had fiift bin made partakers of him. If we be
chv/fcn in him , we fhall not finde in our fclucs the certainety of our
cledion : no , nor yet in God the Father t if we imagine him naked
without the Sonne . Chrift therefore is the mirrour , in whome wc
both muft,and without deceite may beholde our eledion.For fith it
is he into whofe body the Father hath appointed to grafFe ail them
whom from eternity he hath willed to be his , that he may take for
his children fo many as he reknowlcdgeth among his members: wc
hauc a witneffe plaine and fure enough , that we are wry tten in the
booke oflire,ifwc communicate with Chrift. And that fure commu-
nion of himlelfe he gaue vs, when by the preachingc of the GofpcU
he teftjficd that he was giucn to vs of the father, that he with all his
°""* * good things fnould be ours.We are fayd to put on him,and to grow
in. 5. together mto him, that we may liue : becaufe he hueth. So oft is this
5. dodrinc repeated , The Father fpared not his only begotten fonne,
lion. 5. that whofoeuer bclcueth in him, may not perifhe. But he that bele-
*, ^ ucth in him, is fayd to haue paffed from death into life. In which
. ' ' fenfe he calleth hirafeife the bread of life , which vvhofo eatethj he
flul not die for euer.Hc(l fjy)hath bin a witncfle to vs,that they fhal
be recerued of theheaucnly Father in place of his children,of whom
he hath bin receiued by faith . If we couet any more than to be ac-
coaipted among the children & heires of God , then we may climbc
abouc Chrift. If this be our vttermoft maike:howe much be we mad
in feeking without him that which we haue already obtained in him,
and which may be founde in him alonef Moreouer fith he is the e-
ternall v/irdom,the vnchangeablc trueth, and faft fettled counfell of
the Fathcr:it is not to be feared leaft that which he declareth to vs in
his wordjllaoulde vary any thinge be it neuer fo title from that will of
the father which we feeke : but rather he faithfully opencth it vnto
vSjfuch ?.s it was from the beginninge, and euer ihalbe.The prs<ftifc
of this dodrine ought alfo to be in vre m prayers . For though the
faith of election doth encourage vs to call vppon God : yet when we
make our praicrs,ic were vnorderly done to throft it into the prefencc
of God,or ro couenant with thisconditio. Lordjifl be elefted, heare
me; forafmuch as he willcih vs to be content with his promifes, and
no where elfe to feeke v/heiher he will be entreateablc to vs or no.
This wifdom {baJlddiuer vs from many fnares , if we can skill to .ip-
ply that tQ a right vfc which hath bin rightly wry tten ; but let vs not
vndifcrct-
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3 . 403
vndifcretely drawc hither and chithcr that which ought to haue bin
rcftraincd.
6 There is alfo for ftabhfhing of our affiance an other ftay of clc-
dion,which we haue fayd to be loyned with our calling. For,whom
Chritt taketh bcinge enlightened with the knowledge of his name
into the bofomcofhis Church J them he is fayd torecciuc into his
faith & protcdion. And whom locucr he reccmeth, they arc fayd ^o ,
be committed to him of the father & dcliuercd to his truft.ihat they ^ ^^^
may be kept into eternall life . VVhat meane we ? Chrift crieth out 1 7. 6.
with a loudc voiccthat fo many as the Father willeth to be faoed, he
hath dcliuercd chcm into his protcdion. Thcrfore if we lift to know
whether God haue care of our fafety , 1 et vs feekc whether he hath
committed vs to Chrift, whom he hath made the onely Sauiour of all
his. Now if we dout whether we be rcceiued of Chrift into his faith
and keping,hc prcuenteth our douting,whcn he voluntarily ofFereth
himfclfc to be oar (hepeheard , and pronounceth that we ihalbe in
the number of his ftiepe if wc heare his voice . Let vs therefore cm- ioh.io.
brace Chrift,bcing liberally fet open for vs,and comming to mcetc vs: 3.
he fhaU number vs in his fliockcjand ftiall kcpc vs cnclofed within his
folds . But there cntreth into vs a carefulnefTe of our ftatc to come.
For as Paulc teacheth that they arc called , which were before cho-
fen:fo Chrift fhewcth that many arc cailed,but fcwc arc chofcn.Yea °^' '
and alfo Paulc himfclfe in an other place diftiortcth vs from careful- Mac a*
neflerLet him that ftandcth (fay thhe)looke that he fall not. Againe, «4.
Art thou gvaffed into the people of God i Be not proudc , but feare: '■^^«
for God is able to cut thee of againc that he may grafte other. Fi- ^°****
nally wc are fufficiently taught by experience it felfe, that calling &
faith areof fmal valuc^vnlcilc there be adioyned continuance which
happcncth not to al men.But Chrift hath dehuered vs fro this care;
fo'r verily thefe promifes haue refpcd to the time to come . All that lohn 6,
my Father giueth me , fiiall come to me : and him that fliall come to j?. and
mc , I will not caft him out of doers. Againe, This is the will of him 4o.
that fcnt mc, the Father, that I loofc nothingc of all thingcs that he
hath giuen me,but may raife them vp againe in the laftday. Againe,
My (hepe heare my voice and they followe mc : I knowe them , and loh.i©,
I giue them eternall hfc , and they fhall not perifhe for eucr , neither 17. *
{hall any man take the out of my hand. The Father which gaue them
to me,is greater then all;and no man can take them out of the hand^
of my Father. Now when he pronounceth,Eucry tree which my Fa- Mat.i c
thcr hath not planted , fhalbc plucked vp by the roote : he fignifieth 13.
pn the cpntrary iide^th^t they can neuei' be plucked from faluation,
£E£ iij
Cap. 24. Of the maner howto recefue
which hauc roote in God. Wherewith agreeth that faying of lohn^
r.Toh.2. Ifthey had bin of vSjthcy had not at all gone out from vs. Hereupon
'9- alfo commeth that noble glorying of Paule againft life and death,
g ' prefent thingcs and tlwngcs to come ; which gloryinge mutt needcs
be grounded vpon the gift of connnuacc. Neither is it any dout that
he dircdeth this faying to all the faithful. In an other place tlie fame
Phi!. I. Paule fayth.He that hath begonne in you a good worke, Ih.dl cnde it
'^* eucn vntillthe day of Chrift. As alfo Dauid, when his faith fainted,
Pfi 1 3 8 leaned vron this ftay:Thou fhah not forfake the worke of thy hands.
®* And now neither is th»« doutfuii, that Chrift when he prayeth for all
the faithful], askcththe fame thinge for them which he asketh for
Luk, 22 Peter , that their faith may ncuer faint . Whereby we gather , that
i '* they arc out of daunger of falJinge away,becau(e the fonnc of God,
askinge ftedfaft continuance for their godlintfie, fuffered no dcniall.
What wouldc Chrift haue vs to learne hereby , but that we fliouldc
truft that wcHiall perpetually be fare, becaufc wc are ones made
his .5
7 But it daily happcneth, that they which feemed to be Chriftes,
do againc i eaolt from him & fal.Yea & in the very fame place where
he afhrmcth that none had periflied of them which were giucn him
loh.ttf. of thcFather,yethe cxceptcth the fonne ofperdinon.Thatis trueiti
**• dcedc:but this is alio as certainCjthat fuch did ncuer cicaue to Chrift
witli that affiance of heart with which I fay that the aflurednes ot our
i.Ioh. I eledion is ftablifhed. They went out from vs ( fayth lohn ) but they
'^* were not of v%. For ifthey had bin of vs, they had ftill taned with vs.
Neither do I deny that they haue like fi.nes of callmge as the dtd:
haue : but I do not graunt that they haue that fure ftabhfhment of c-
ledion which I bid the faithfull to fetch out of the worde of the Go-
fpcU. Wherefore let not fuch examples moue vs but that we quietely
lohri ?. reft vpon the promife of the Lordc , where he pronounceih, that all
1 6. 5c <J they are giue to him of the Father,which receiuehim with true faith,
35>* of whom fich he is their kcper and Paftor,noneniallperifli.OfIudas
wc fhall fpcake hereafter.Paule doth not counfell Chriftians from af-
furedneffe altogethcr,but from carelcflc and loofe afluredneffe of the
flefhjwhich draweth with it,pride,prefumption, & difdaine of other,
and qucnchcth humility and the reaerencc of God, & bringeth for-
gettulncsof grace rcceiued.For he fpeaketh to the Gentiles, whom
»he teacheth, that they ought not proudly & vngenily to reproch the
lewes for this, that the I ewes beingc difherited,ihcy were fet in their
ftede.Feare alfoherequircthnot v/herv/ith they ftiould be dilmaied
andfl:agger,but which framing vs to the hilbler receiuing of the grace
of
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. . 404
of GodjOiould abate nothing of the .iffiance thf rcof-jas we hauc la) d
inanother place Befidethat,he doih not there fpcakc to cuery man
partictJlarly,but to the fedcs thcfelucs generally. For whvn y Church
was diuidcd into two parts, & cnuy bred dilfenhon.Paule putccth the
Gentiles in minde that their being fupphedWto the place of y pecu-
liar & holy people, ought to be to them a caufe of tcare & modcfty.
And among them there were many puflfed vp with glory ,whofe vain
boftingit was profitable to beat down.But we haue in an other place
fhewedjthat our hope is extended to the time to come euen beyond
death, and that nothing is more contrary to the nature of it, than to
dout what fhall become of vs.
8 That faying ofChrift,cfmanybcingc called but few chofcn,is
very ill taken after that mancr.Therc (halbe nothingc doutfull if wc
hold faft that which ought y) be cleare by the things aboue fpoken,
that there arc two forts of calling. For there is an vntuerfall callmgc
wherby through the outward preaching of the word,Godcalleth al-
together to himjcuen them alfo to whom he fettcih it forth vnto the
fauor of death,& vnio matter of more grieuous condemnation.The
other is a fpcciall calling which for the moft parte he vouchfaueth to
giuc only to the faithfull,whcn by the inward enlightnin?, of his fpirie
nemakeihythe word preached is fettled in their hearts.Yeifomtimc
he maketh them alfo partakers of it whome he enlighteneth but for a
timej& afterward by the dcferuing of rheir vnthankfulnes forfaketh
thcm,& ftriketh them with greater bhndencs.Now when the Lorde
faw the Gofpell to be publifhed farre and wide , and to be defpifed of
many , but to be had in due price of fewe ; he defcribcth to vs God w.j^, ^
vnder the perfon of a king,which preparinge a folemne feaft fendcth
his mcfl'engers rounde about to biddeagreat multitude to be his
geftcs,and yet can get but a fewcjbecaufc euery one alleageih lettcs
for his excufe, fo that at length he is compelled vpon their refu-
falljto call out of the hie waves euery one that he meeteth. Hither-
to euery man feeth that the parable muft be vnderftande of the out-
ward callinge. He addeth afterward that God doth like a good maker
of a feaft , which goeth about the tables , to cheerc his geftes . If
he finde any not clothed with a wedding garment,he will not fuffer
him with his vncleanlineffc to difhonour the folemnity of the fcaft.'
This parte of the parable , I graunt , is to be vnderftande of them-
which enter into the Church by the profeflion of faith , but are not
clothed with the fandification of Chrift. Suchdiflionors and as it
were botches of his Church, the Lord will not fuffer for eucr:but,as
their fikhinclTe deferucth he wUl catt them out. Therefore fewj? arOi
££E iiij
Cap.24. Of themanerhowto receiuc
chofen out of a great number of them that arc called, but yet not
with that callinge by which we fay that the faithfull ought to iudgc
their eledion, For,that gencrall caUinge is alfo common to the wic-
ked : but this fpcciall Callinge bringctn with it the fpiritc of regene-
ration, which is the earncft & Icalc of the inheritace to come,wher-
with our hearts are feakd vp againft the day of the Lord.In a fummc
phe.i. fith hypocrites boaft of godlineflfe as well as the true worfhippers of
?- GodjChrift pronounceth y at length they fhalbe caft out of ihe place
u.iS. ^hich they wrongfully pofiTefTe: as it is fayd in the PfalmejLord^who
ihall dwell in thy tabernacle ? The innocent in handes,^ the man of
fa. %i ^ P""*^ heart. Again in an other placcThis is the generation of them
that feckc God,of them that feckc the face of the God of lacob. And
fo doth the Spirit exhortc the faithfull to fufferance, that they take ic
not grieuoufly that the Ifraelites be mingled with the in the Church:
for at length their vifor fhalbe plucked from them & they fhalbe caft
out without fliame.
8 The fame refon is of y cxceptio cue now alleaged,wherc Chrift
>h 17. ^^y'^ that none perilhed but the fonne of perdition. It is in deede an
2, vnproper fpeeche , but yet not darke . For he was not accompted a-
mongc the fhcpe of Chrift, for that he was one in deede, but becaufe
ahn 6 ^^ ^^P' ^^^ place of one . And where in an other place the Lord af-
o^ ' firmcth that he was chofen with the Apoftlc5,that is fpoken onely in
oho 15 rcfped ofthe miniftery.Twclue(fayth he)haue I chofen, and one of
tbtm is a Diuilrthat is,hc had chofen him to the office of an Apoftle.
But when he fpeaketh ofchoofing tojfaluation,hedeniethvhim farrc
away from the number of the chofen fayinge : I fpeake not of all : I
T kaowe whome I hauc chofen. If a man do in both places confounde
l^ ' '' the wordeof Chooiinge he ftiall miferably cntam^le himfelfe : if he
omi[ make difference , nothmeje is more pi aine. Therefore Gregory tca-
' cheth very ill and peftilently when he fayth that we knowc onely our
callinge , but are vncertaine of our eledlion : whereby he moueth all
men to feare and trcmblinge : vfinge alfo this rcafon, but becaufe we
know what we be to day,but what we (halbe wc know not. But in that
place he fufficiently dcclareth , how he ftumbl.d at this blocke.For,
becaufe he hanged eledion vppon the merices of workes,he had mat-
ter enough and more to difcourage the mindes of menrbut he could
not ftrengchen them,which did not remouc them from themfelues to
the affiace ofthe goodnes of God.Hereofy faithful haue fome taft of
rha»: which we haue determined at the biginningy predeftinatio if it be
righf ly thought vpon, bringeth not a {haking of faith, but rather the
bcft ttrcngthning of ir. And yet I deny not,that y holy Ghoft frameth
his
The grace of Chrift. Lib.j. 405
his talkc to the Imale mcfure of our fenfe. As when he faith. In the Fxe.13
fccrct of my people they fhall not bc.and in the rowle of my feruats ^•
they fliall not be written. As though God did beginnc to write in the
bookc of hfe,them whom he reckencrh in the numbrc of his:whcra$
yet we knowe.euen by the witnefle of Chrift, that the names of the
children of God arc from the beginning written in the booke of hfe. Phil. 4
Butinthefewordsisonly exprefledthecaihngaway of ihemwhich ?•
fcemed the chefe among the ekd : as it is faid in ihc Pfalme. Let ^'^ ^
them be blotted out of the bookc of life,8c let them not be written
with the righteous.
^ But the eled are neither immediatly from the wombcnor all
at one time , by calling gathered together into the flocke of Chrift,
but as It pleafcth God to diftribute his grace to them.But ere they be
gathered together to that chefe {liepeherd,they are fcattered abroad
and ftray in the common defertc , and differ nothing from other,
faumg that they be defended by the fingular mercie of God , from
falhnge in:o the extreme hedlongc downefali of death.Therefore if
youlokc vpon rhem felues,you llial fee the offpring of Adam, which
fauorcth of the common corruption of the whole mafle. That they
be not earned into extreme and dcfpcired vngodlynefie , this com-
meth not to paffe by any goodnefle naturally planted in them but
becaufe the eye of God watcheth , and his hand is ftrciched out to
their (aluaiion. For they that dreame that from their very naxiuitic
there is plated in their hcartes I wore not what Cctdc of tledion,by
the vertue whereof they are alway enclincd to godlyncs and to the
feare of God,they both are not holpen to proue it by the authoritic
of Scripture,and alfo are confuted by experience it felfe.Thcy do in
dccde bring forth a fewe examples to proue that the eled cucn be-
fore their enlig'itning,were not vtterly ftrangers from rehgion : that
Paule in his being a Pharifeeliued vnreprouable,thatCornehus.was PHil.3.
by almes and prayers accepted of God : and fuch other. Of Paule, ^'
we graunt to themrof Cornelius, we fay that ihey are deceiued. For ^ '
it appeareth that he was then already enlightned and regenerate , fo
that he wanted nothing but the clerereuelingof the Gofpell. But
what will they wring out by thefe fewe examples ? that ail the eledl
are alway endued with the fpirit of goodlinefle? No more than if a
man by fticwiigthe vprightncfle of Ariftides, Socrate$,Xenocrate$,
Scipio , Curius , Camillius, and other, fliould thereof gather that all
they that are left in blindnelfe of idolatrie,werc defirous followers of
holines & honeftie. Yea and the Scripture in more places than one,
openly crieth out againft them. For, the ftate which Paul defcribeth
Cap.24. Ofthemanethowtoreccmc
Ephe.2. of chcEphefians before their regeneration jfhewcth not one grain
*• of this feede. Yc were (faith he) deadc with defaultes and finnes jin
which yc walked according to the time of this worJde, according to
the prince of the aire,which nowe worketh in the obttinate children:
among whom we all alfo were fometime conucrfant in the luftes of
our flelh , doing thofe things that hked our fleOi and mindc. And wc
IpKe.5. were by nature the children of v/rath,as other alfo were. Againe,Rc-
^' mcmbrethat ye were fomtime without hope, aud lacked God in the
P ^•4* vvorld Againe. Ye were fomtime darkcnelTe : but nowe ye are light in
the Lorde : walke as the children of light. But pardyenture they will
hauc thefe things to be referred to the ignorance of the true God,
wherewith they denie not that the eled are holden before that they
be called. Albeit this were a fhamelclTe cauilling,fi th he thereof con-
cludeth, that they ought nowe no more either to lie or to ftealc : yet
x.Cor. what will they aunfwer to other places ? as is that place to the Corjn-
^■^' thians,wherc when he had pronounced that neither whoremongers,
nor idolatrets , nor adulterers , nor weakehngs , nor buggerers , nor
theues,nor couetous mcn,lhalbe heires of the kingdome of God:hc
by & by adderh that they were wrapped in the fame hainous oftenfes
before that they kncwe Chrift : but nowe that they are both wafhed
by his bloodc and made free by his Spirit. Againe an other place to
Pom.«.thcRomaines. Asyehauegeuen your membrcsbond to vnclean-
■^* ne{le,and to iniquitie vnto iniqnitie , nowe yeld theni in bondage to
rightcoufneire. For what frute had you of thofe things , in which yc
arc nowe worthily afhamed.&c.
II What maneroffeedcofeledionj pray you, did then budde
in thc,which being manifoldly defiled in all their lifc> as it were with
defperate wickednes, wallowed in the moft abhominablc & accurfed
finne of all ? If he would hauc fpoken after their opinion , he fhould
haue Ihewcd howe much they were bond to the bountifulneflcof
God , by which they had bene preferued from Aiding into (o great
i.Pet.if. filthinefte. So Peter alfo fhould haue exhorted his to thankefulneflc
I* for the perperuall {cede of eledion. But he contrary wife putteth
them in minde thaty time part ftifSced to make an ende of the luftes
Icri I oftheGetiles.Whatif wccometocxamplesfwhat buddeof righte-
a.Kin. oufnc'lTe was there in Rahab the harlot , before faith ? in M.mafle,
12.17- when Hierufalem was dipped and in a maner drowned in the bloodc
^"*^''*- of the Prophetcs ? in the Thefe , which among his laft gafpings be-
* * ganne to thinke of repentance? Away therefore with thefe argumcrsj
which filly curious men do rafliely deuife to themfelues without the
Scripture. But let that abide certaine with vs , which the Scripture
hath,
i
Tlie grace of Chrift. Lib.3, 40^
liath , that all bauc ftrayed like loft llicpc , cuery one hath fwarucd ^^^ Sh
into his owne way>that is, perdition. Out of this goulfc of perdition, ^*
whom the Lorde hath determined ones to plucke forth , them he
differreth til his fit time : oncly he preferueth them,that they fall not
vnto vnpardonablc blafphemy.
12 As the Lorde by- the efFe<5lualncire of his callinc; towardc
the elc(5l,makcih perfed the faluation,wher€ vnto he haddc by eter-
hall counfell appointed them : fo he hath his judgements againft the
rcproh.itc. whereby he executeth his counfell of them. Whom ther-
fore he hath created vnto the fhameof lifcjand deftrudion of death,
that they lliould be inftrumentcs of his wrath , and examples of his
feuentie: tromchcmjthat they may come to their ende,fomtime he
takcth away the power to heare his word, and fomtime by the prea-
ching of it he more blindeth and amafeth them. Of the firft mancr,
whereas there be innumerable examples, let vs choofe out one more
clearc and notable than all the reft. There paflfed away about fower
thoufande ycares afore Chrift, in which he hidde frorn ail the Gen-
tiles the light of his health bringing dodrine. If any man anfwer that
he therefore made them not to emoy fo great a benefit bycauie he
iudged them vnworthy ,they which come after fliallnot be proued
any more worthy. Of which thing, bilidethe experience, Malachie is Mala 4,
a fubft.mtiali witncs, which reprouingmfidelitie mingled with grofl'e *•
blaiphcmies , yet declarcth that there ili^ill come a redeemer. Why
therefore is he rather geucn to thefethan tothofe?He fliall trouble
himfelfe in vaine , that fliall here fcarch for a caufe hicr than the fc-
crec and vnfearchable counfell of God. Neither is it to b^ feaied
leaft any fcholctof Porphyrie, (hou!d freely gnawe attheri^hteouf-
neflie of God while we aunfvver nothing in defenfe of it. For when we
fay that none perifh vndeferuing,3nd that it is of the free bountiful-
iic-ftc of God that fomc be deliuered, there is largely enough faid
for the fetting forth of his glorie, fo that it needeth not our lifting.
The foueraigne iudge therefore maketh a way for his predeftination,
when whomc he hath ones reicded , them being depriued of the
communicating of hislight heleauethin blindenclTe. Of the other
mancr there arc both daily examples, and alfo many coteined in the
Scripture. One felfe fame preaching is comonly made to a hundred,
twenty recciuc it with ready obedience of faith; the reft do either fet
naught by it , or fcorne it , or hiife it out , or abhorre it. If any man
aunfwer that this diuerficie proceedcth of their mahce and pcruerf-
ncffcjhc {hall not yet fatisfie vs : bycaufe the others witt alfo Oiould
be poifefled with the fame mahce , vnlefl'e God did amende it with
Cap.24. Ofthcmanerhowtorccciuc
his goodneffe. Therefore we ihall ftill be encombrcd, vnlcfle we call
"or. to mind that which Paul faichjWho maketh thee to differ? Whereby
^* he fignificrii that fome exccll other feme, not by their owne vcrtue,
but by the onely grace of God.
1 5 Why therforc doth he in graunting grace to thofc paffe ouer
i-tj. there?Of thofeLukefhewethacaufe, Bycaufe they are ordcined to
hfe. Of thefe,whai (hall we ihink,but becaufc they are the veflels of
Gen, wrath vnto diihonor ? Wherefore let it not grcue vs to fay with Au-
J"c«guftme. God^faith he) might turne the will of the euell into good,
p.io. becaufe he is almighty.Hc might in deede.Why therefore doth he k
not? becaufe he would nor. Why he would not, is in himfclf For we
ought to be no more wife than we ought to be. And that is much
)m!l. better, than to (hift with Chryfoftomc, and fay that he draweih him
con- that is willing and reacheth his hand , that the difference may not
'^^<^' feeme to ftand in the iudgemct of God,but in the onely will of men.
Truely it fo ftandeth not in the propre motion of man,that eucn the
godly and they that fearcGodhaueneede of a fingular inftrudion
J.I 6. of the Spirit. Lidia thepurplefeller feared God, and yet it behoued
that her heart fhould be opcned,that (he might harken to the doc-
trine of Paule , and profit in it. This is not fpoken of one woman
alone, but that we fhould knowe that the profiting of euery man in
godhnefle is the fecrete woike of the Spirit. This verily can not be
brought in queftion,that the Lord fendeth his word to many,whofc
blindncife he will haue to be more enforced . For , to what purpofc
doth he bidde fo many commaundements to be carried to Pharao?
was it becaufe he hoped that with often repeted mcfTages he would
be appeafed ? No, but before he beganne , he forekncwe and fore-
».ii. tolde the ende. Go (faid he to Mofes ) and declare to him my will:
^^■** but I will harden his heart , that he obey not. So when he ftirreth vp
' Ezcchiel , he warneth him aforchande that he fendeth him to a rc-
belhousand ftubborne people : to the ende that he fhould not be
afraydc if he perceiue himfelf to finge to def men.So he foretelleth
rca . to IcremiCjthat his doftrine fhould become a fier,to deftroy and waft
I < a ^^^ people like fluble. But the prophecie of Efaie yet more enfor-
ccth it. For he is thus fcnt of the Lorde : Go and fay to the children
of Ifraell : With hearing heare ye,and vndcrflandc not :With fcing
fee ye,and knowe not. Make obll:!nate the heart of this people , and
make heauy their eare$,and ouer plaifter their eyes : leaft paraduen-
turcthey may fee with their eyes, and heare with their eareSj and
vnderftand with their heart , that beinf; turned they may be healed*
Behold he dirc^eth his voice to them^but that ihey may vyaxe more
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 407
Jcffchc lightcih a lighr,buc that ihcy may be made more blindcchc
(hcwcth forth doftrine , but that they may be made more dull : he
Jaiethto them a remcdy,but not that they may be healed. And John loh.ia,
allegmg this prophccic , affirmeih that the I ewes could not bclcuc ^^'
the dodnneof Chrift jbecaufc this curfc of God lay vponthcm.
Neither can this alfo be in controuerh'e , that whom God will not
haue to be enlightened, to ihcm he dcliucred his dodrine wrapped
vp in darke fpcches , that they may nothing profit thereby but to be
thruft into greater dulneffe. Chriit alfo rcftifieth>thac he doth there-
fore expound onely to the Apoftles the parables in which he had Mat.ij,
Ipoken to the multitude, bycaufe to them it was geuen to knowc the "•
mifteries of the kingdomc of God , but to the common people not
fo. What meancth the Lordc (wilt thou fay) in teaching them , of
whome he prouideth that he may not be vnderftandcd f Confider
whcnfc is the faulr.and thou wiit ccflc to afkc.For in the word howc
great darknefTe foeuer there be , yet there is alway light enough to
conuince the confciencc of the wicked.
14 Nowe remaineth for vs to (ce,why the Lord doth that which
it is plaine that he doth. If it be aunfwered that it is fo done becaufc
men haue fo deferucd by their vngodlincire,wickcdnes,& vnthanke-
fulnes : the fame fhall in dedc be well & truely faid:but bjcaufc there
appearcth not yet the reafon of this diuerlitic , why when fome arc
bowed to obcdicnce.other fome continue hardened, in fearching it
wemuft needes go to that which Paule hath noted out of Mofcs, Rom.>
namely that God hath raifcd them vp from the beginning, that he »7«
might ihewe his name in the whole earth. Whereas therefore the
reprobate do not obey the word of God opened vnto them, that
ihalbc well imputed to the malice and perucifeneffc of their heart,
fo that this be therewithal! added that they are therefore geuen into
this peruerfncflTe , becaufc by the righteous but yet vnfcarcheablc
iodgemec of God they are railed vp to fet forth his gloric with their
damnation.Likewile when it is faid of the fonncs of Hely, that they i.Sim,
harkened not to holfomc warnings, bccaufe the Lorde willed to kill *»'S»
them : it is not denied that the ftubbornelTc procedcd of their ownc
naughtineflc ; but it is therewiihall touched why tlrcy were leftein
ftubborneflc , when the Lorde might haue foftencd their heartes,
namly becaufc his vnchageable decree hadde ones appointed them
todeftrudion. To the famepurpofe feructh that faying of lohn, Toh- 1^
When he had done fo great fignes, no man beleued in him:that the 3**
word of Efaic mi-^ht be fulfilled , Lordc, who hath beleued our fay-
ing? For though he do not cxcufc the ftifncckcd from blame , yet he
Cap.24. Of the maner how to receiuc
is eocene wj^th rhatrcafonjthat the grace" of God is vnfauoric to meri»
till the holy Ghoft bringtaft. AndChnit alleging the propbccie of
6hn.<f. EfaiejThey fi^aU all be taught of God^ tcndcth to no other cnde buc
^)« ro proue that the levves ard reprobate and Grangers fro the Church,
becaufe they arc vnapt to learnc : and he bringcth no other caufe
thereofjbut for that the promife of God doth not perteine to them.
Which thing this faying of Paule conHrmeth , that Chrift v/hich to
the Icwes is an offenfe,and to the gentiles foolifiines,is to the called
the (Vrengthand wifcdome of God. For when he hath toldewhat
commonly happeneth fo oft as the Gofpell is preached , namly that
fomcit makcthmoreobftinatc,andoffome itisdefpifed, he faith
that it is had in price of rhem onely which are called. He had in
deedc a litde before named them belcuerSibut he meant not to tak^
away the due degree from the grace of God which goeth before
faith, buc rather he added this feconde faying by way of Corrcdion,
that they which had embraced the Gofpell ihould ijeuc the praife of
their faith to the callingof God. As alfo a Inle after he teachech that
they are chofcn of God When the vngodly hcare thefe things,they
crieout that God with inordmate poAver abufeth his poorc crea-
tures for a fporie to his crueltie. But we whjch knowe that all men
are fo many wayes endangered to the iudgcment featc of God , that
being af ked of a thoufand things they can not fatisiie in one,do con-
feife that the reprobate fufFer nothing which agreeth not with the
mofi lufl iudgement of God. Whereas we do not clerely atteine the
reafon thereof,let vs not be difcontent to be ignorant of fomewhat,
where the wifedom ot God lifteth vp it felfe into fo great heigth.
1 5 But forafmuch as there are a fewe places of fcripture wont
to be obiededjin which God feemeth to dcnie that it is done by his
ordinance that the wicked do peri{h,but by this that , he crieng out
againll kt,they wilfully bring death vpon themfeluesdet vs by brefely
declaring thefe places^ewe that they make nothing againft the fen-
tence aboue fet.There is brought forth a place of E2rchicl,thai God
will not the death of a finner , but rather that he may be turned and
liue.lf they will extende this to all mankinde:why doth henotmouc
many to repentance , whole mindes are more pliable to obedience,
than theirs which at his daily allurements waxe harder and harder?
With the Sodomites ( as Chrift witnefTcth ) the preaching cf the
Gofpell and miracles would haue brought forthmorefrute thanin
I urie.Howe commcth it to palTe therfore,if God will all to be faued,
that he openeth not the gate of repentance to thofe mrferable men
that would hauc bene more ready to receiuc grace ^ Hereby we fee
thac
The grace of Chrifl. Lib.3. 408
.that the place is violently wrefted , if the will of God , whereot che
Prophec inaketh mcntion,be fet againft his ctcrnall counfcll,whcre-
by he hath fcucred the cled from the reprobate.Now if we fcke foe
the true natural} meaning of the Prophet: his purpofe is to bring
hope of pardon to y penitent. And this is the fummejthat it is not to
be doutcd bur that God is ready to forgcuc fo (one as the (inner tur-
neth. Therefore he willeth not his death , in fo much as he wiUcth
his repentance. But experience teachcththathc fo willcthihcmto
repent whome he generally calletb to him, that yet he toucheth not
all their heartes . Yet is it therefore to be faid that he dealeth de-
ceitfully, becaufc although the outward voice do but make them
vncxcufable which hcarc & do not obey it,yet it is trucly accomptci
the tcftimonie of the grace of God , by which teftimonic he rccon-
cileth men to himfelfe. Therefore let vs holde this for the meaning
of the Prophetjthatthc death of a (inner pleafeth not Godithat the
godly may haue affiance, that fo fone as they fhalbe touched with
repcntace,therc is pardon ready for them with God:and the wicked
may fele that their fault is doubled, becaufc theyaunfwer nottofo
great mercifullkindenelTeand gentlencffe of God. Themercicof
God therefore wil alway mete rcpentance,but to whom repentance
is geuen > both all the Prophets ,and ApofHes , and Ezechiell him-
felfe do plainely teach. Secondly there is alleged a place of Paulc, i Tim.
where he faith that God wiUeth all men to be (aued, which although ^•4.
it haue a diuerfe meaning from the other,yctin fomthing they agree;
together. I aunfwer,firft that by the reft of the texte it is made plaine*
howe he willeth. For Paule coupleth togethcfjthat he willeth them
to be faucd,and to come to the acknowledging of the tructh. If
they will haue this to be determined by the eternall cOunfcll of
Godjthat they receiue the dodrine of faluation : what meaneth that
faying of Mofes , What nation is fo noble, that God commeth ^c"^'4'
neare to it as he doth to thee f How came it to palTc that God ref- ^'
ftrained from many peoples the light of the Gofpell , which other
cnioyed ? Howe came it to paffe that the pure knowledge of godly-
nelfc neuer came tofome , and fome fcarcely taftcd Co much as any
darke principles of it?Hereof itfhallnowe be eafy to gathcr,where-
to Paule tcndeth. He haddccommaund.cdTimothce to make fo-
lemne prayers la.the.Chiirchc foe kinges and princes. But when it
Teemed fomewhat an abfurdicie th.it prayers Ihoulde be made to
God for a kinde ofmenncin a manner defpcired (becaufethey
were not onely ftrangcrs from the body of Chnft , but a'fo cnde-
uored with all ihcir forces to oppreflfhts kmgdomc) h? added, tha:
Cap.24. Of the maner how to receiue
the fame is acceptable to God which vvilleth all men to be faue^.
Whereby verily he figniaerh nothing ds but that he hath flopped
vp the way vnto faluation to no degree of men : but rather that he
hath Co powrcd out his mercic that he willeth no man to be voidc
of it.The other fenteces do not declare what God hath by his fecret
iudgemet determined of all men : but do (hcwe that there is pardon
redy for all finners which do oncly turne ihemfelues to require k.
For if they more ftifly ftande vpon this that it-is faid that he will banc
mercic vpon all , I will on the contrarie fide aunlwer them with that
>fa.if5. which is written in an other place,That our God is in heaucn where
i^- he doth whatfoeuer he will.This word iherfore mutt To be expouded
^o«35' j},3j jj jjj^y agree with the other, I will haue mercie vpon whome I
will haue mercy, and I will lliewe mercie to whom I will fhcw mercy.
He that choofcih out them whom he will haue mercie on , doth not
gcuc it to all. But fith it dcarely appereth that m that place is fpoken
not of all particular men,but of degrees of mcn,we wil make no lon-
ger difputing about it. Howebeit it is alfo to be noted,that Paul doth
not affirmc what God doth alway and euery where and in all mem
but Icaucth it to him at his libcrtie at length to rrjake kings and ma-
giftrats partakers of the heauenly dodnne , although by reafon of
their blindcnefl'e they do nowc rage againft it. They feeme to prcifc
vs more ftrongly with obieding the place of Peter,th3t God willeth
none toperilh, but receiueth all to repentance. But the vndoingof
this knot doth by and by offer it felfe in the fecond woide , bycauic
the will to rcceiuc can not be vnderftaded to be any other than thar
ire $6. which is euery where taught. Truely the turning is in the hand of
'6. God : whether he will turne all or nojet himfelfe be afked , when he
promifeth that he will geue to a cercaine fewemena flefhly heart,
leaning to other fome a ftony heart. It is true in deedc , that rnleflc
he v/ere ready to rcceiuc them which call vpon his mercie,this faying
lach.x. fliould be falfc, Turne to me , and I will turne to you. But I fay that
!• none of all mortall men doth come to God but he that is prcuented
I Tim of God. And if repentance were in the will of man,Paulc would not
'^5' fay,Ifparaduenturc he geue them repentance. Yea vnleflc the fame
God which with word exhortcth all men to repentance, did with
fecret mouingofhis fpirit bring the chofen to it : Icremie would
g""^- 3^* not fay, Turne me, Lorde , and I flialbc turned : for when thou haft
turned me,I haue repented.
16 But (thou wilt fay) if it be fo,there fhalbe (mal truth in the
p'. omifcs of the Gofpell,which when they teftifie of the will of God,
ailirmc that he willeth that which i« aaaindhis inuiolablc decree.
Not
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3 . 409
Not fo.For howclf:)cuer the proraifcs offaluation be vniuerfall , ycc
they nothing difagiec with the predcftination of the reprobate , Co
Xhn we direct our mindcs to the effed of them.VVc knowc that iheu
and not till then the promifes are cjfFtduall to vs , when v/e receiuc
them by faith , on the other fide when faith is made voide , the pro-
mifc is there\Tithall aboliilicd. If this be the nature of them ,let rs
then fee whether rhefc things; difagrce together : that it is faid that
God hath from cternitie ordeined whome he wjU embrace with
loue.and vpon whom he will exercifc wrath : and that he promifeth
faluation to all without difference. Truely I fay that they agree very
well.For in Co promiling he mcaneth nothing els than that his mercy
is fct open for all v/hich do couet and crane it: which thing none
do but they whom he hath enlightncd . And them he enlightncth,
whom he hath predcftinate to faluation.Tliey (1 fay) haue the truth
of the promifes fure and vnfhaken, fo as it can not be faid that there
is any difagreement betwene the eternal! clcdion of God , and the
teflimonic of his grace which he offercth to the faiihfull. But why
nameth he All? verily that the confcicnccs of the godly may the
more fafely reft,when they vnderftand that there is no difference of
(inncrs , fo that faith be prefcnt : and that the wicked may not cauill
for their excufcjthat they want a (anduary whcrunto they may wiih-
drawe ihemfelucs from the bondage of finne,when with their ownc
vnthankfulneHe they rcfufe it being ofFrcd them.Therfore when the
mcrcie of God is by the Gofpell offred to both fortes, it is faith,thac
is to fay the enlightning of God , which maketh diiference betwene
the godly and vngodly , fo as the one fort fcleth the effedualneffe of
the Gofpell, and the other fortobteine no frute rherof.The enlight-
ning itfelf alfo hath the eternall eledionof God for the rule thcrof.
The coplaint ofChrift, which they allege , Icrufalem, IerufaJem,how ^^^»^i
oft haue I willed to gather together thy chickcn&,but thou wouldeft '^'
notPmaketh nothing for them. I graunt that Chrift there fpekeih not
onely in the perfon of man,but alfo reprocheth them that in all agci
they haue refufed his grace. But we muft define y will of God which
is entreated of. For neither is it vnknowcn,hoWc diligently God cn-
<3euored to kepe ftill that people, and with how great ftiffencffe they
cuen from the Hrft to the laft being gcuen to their wandering defires
refufed to be gathered together: but it followeth not thereof that
thecounfell of God was made voide by the malice of men. They
aunfwer and fay that nothing lelTe agrceth with the nature of God
than to haue a double will in him. Which I graunt to thejfo that tiicy
fitly expound it. But why do they not conlidcr fo many teftimonics*
FFJ?
Cap.24. Of the manerhowto rccciiie
where God putting vpon him the affldions of man defcendeth be-
^fa. 6)» neath his owne maiclly?Hs faith that he harh with Wretched out ar-
'• mes called the rebellious people,th.u he hath early & late trauailed
ro bring ihem backe to him. If they wil apply all thefe things to God,
and not con(ider the Hgurc , there fhall arife many lupcrfluous con-
tentions , winch this one folution bringeth to agre-mcnt,that the
propretie of man is figuratiuely applied to God.Howibeitthe folu'
lion which we haue brought in an other place largely fufficethjthac
although the will of God be, as to our fenfe manifold ; yet he doth
not in himfelfe diueifly will this and that, but according to his wifc-
Jphe.j. dome, which IS dmerlly manifold (a^Paule callcth it ) he anriafeth
0» our fenfesjtill it lliall be gsue vs to know that he maruedoufly willeih
that which now feemeth to be againft his will. They alfo mocke with
• cauillation'jthat (ith God is the father of all,it is vnriahteoiis that he
ihould dillierit any that hath not before with his own fault defcrucd
this punifhmec. As though the liberalitie of God llrerchcth not euen
tohogges &dogges.But)f they fpcakconly of mankind, let the an-
fwerc why God bound himfelf to one peOple,to be the father therof:
and why alfo out of the fame people he picked a fmal numbre as it
were a tlourc. But their owne lull of euel! fpeaking hindereth thcic
railers that they cofider not that God fo bringeth forth his funne to
Ihine vpon the good and euell , that t!)e inheritance is layedvpfor 3'
fewe, to whome it lli.ill one day hz faid , Come ye blcff.d of my Fa-
•^att.5. ther, polftflcthekingdomc.&c. They obicd alfo tliat God hateth
^5- none oi thefe things that he hath made. Winch although J grauntc
' '^^' *^' them,yet this remaineth fife which I teac he, that the 1 eprobate arc'
''^' hatcfull to God,and that very rightfully.bccau'c they being dtftitutc
of his Spirit can bring forth nothing but caufe of curfe. They fay
further,that there is no difference of the lewe and the Gentile, and
therefore that the grace of God is without difference fet before all
Lorn 5). menncrnamely if they graunt (as Paul dctermineth) that God calleth
,4. as well our of the lewes as out of the Gentiles,nccordmg to his good
pleafurejfo that he is bound to no man. rafter this maner alfo is that
Lom II, ^'^'pd away which they obiedin an other pi jce, thit God hath en-
2. clofcd all things vnder linne,that he may hauc mercy vpon alhname-'
lybecaufe he will that the faluationof all them that are faued be
afcnbed to his mercie, although this benefite be nor common to all.
Nowe when many things are alleaged on both parts , let this he our
conclu(ion , to tremble with Paule at fo ereat depth , and if wanton
Lom. 5. tongues lliall be bufie,that we be not afhamed of this his crieng out,
°' O man, what aric thou that ftriuefi with God?For Augulhne trudy
affir-
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 410
affirmeth that rhey do pcrucifly which mcafure the rightcoufneHc t)epr?-
of God by the mcafurc of the nghtcoufneirc of man. oJa/ia*
cap. 2.
A
The XXV. Chapter.
of the lajl \efurrtHion.
Lthough Chrift the fonnc of righteoufnefic, hauing ouer-
comc death, fhining by the Gofpcljgeucth vs the hght of hfc
(ss Paule wirneflcth) whereby alfo it is faid that by btle- 2. Tim.
uing wehauc palled from death into life, bemgnowe not »>o.
foreners and Grangers, but citizens with the faintes , and o!- the '"•^*
houfholde of God, which hath made vsto (it with the onely be- Enhe.».
gotten fonne himfelfe in hcaucnly placcs,ihat nothing moy be wan • i^.
tin;^ to pcrfcd fchcitie : yet Icaft it fhould be greuous vnto vs to be
cxercifcd vnder this hard warfare , as though wc had no frute of the
vidorie which Chrill hath ^oitcn,we muft holde faft that which is in
an other place taught of the nature of hope. For , bccaufe wc hope
for thofc things which appearc not,& (as it is faid in an other place)
faith is a demonftration of things inuifible:fb long as we arccn-
clofed in tht' pnfori of the flclh , we are wayfaring from the Lordc.
For which rcafon the fmie l^aule fairh in an otherplacc that we arc Rotn.8.
deade, andch.it our life IS hidden with Chrift in God , and that when 28.
he which IS our life, (hall appeare.then {naliwealfo appcarewirh Htb.ii.
him in gloiie. This therefore is our condttioii, that with liuingfo- '"^
berly and iuftly and godlily in this worlde, we lokefor ihc bLiltd ^jj.
hope.andthecommingof the gloricof the great God, and of our Colo j.
fauiour lefus Chrift. Hc're we neede a fingular patience, that vvc be ^
*iot wearied and either toi/m\ backe our courfe , or forfake our ftan- ^' **
ding. Therefore whatfoeuerharh bene hetheito fct out concerning
our r3luation,requireth mindes lifted vp to heaucn,that we may loue
Chrift whome we haue not feen , and belcuingin him may rcioiic
wi'h vnfpeakeable and glorious ioyfulncffe, till we receiue the cndc
of our faith, as Peter telleth vs. Afterwiiichmaner, Paulc faith that 1 Pct.i.
the faith and chariiic of the godly bach tcfpfd to the hope which is 8 .
laycd vpin hcaue. When wc thus with our eyes faftenedvpon Chrift ^<*lo-*'
dohangof hcaucn, and nothing withholdeth them inearth , from
carriengvsto the promifcd blfftedncfle: then is that tiutly fulfilled,
Our heart is where our treafure is. Hereupon commcih that faith is Mat.7.
'io tare in the world, becaufc nothing is morchaid to our dulnelfe ai,
then through innumerable fteppes to chmbe vp aboue them with
endcuoring forward to the price of our heaucnly calling: To the
great hcape of mifcries wherewith we bcalmoft ouerwhelmcd,arc
FFF ij
Cap,i5* Ofthemanerhowtoreceiue
added themockings of vngodly men, wherewith our fimph'crtic is
railed at, when volucarily forfaking the allurcmentcs of prefent good
things, we feeme to followe the blelVedQcs hidden from vs,as it were
a fleeing Ihadow.Finally aboue and bencth vs,bcfore vs and behindc
vs,violent tcntations befege vs,tothe fuftciningof thcfcarc whereof
our courages lliould be farre to weakejvnleffe bcingc vncumbred of
earthly things they were faft bound to the heauenly life, which in
fcming is farre from vs. Wherefore onel/it hath foundly profited in
the GofpelI,which is enured to acoiinuail meditation of the blefled
rcfurredion.
2 Of the foucraignc ende of good things,the pbilofophers hauc
in olde time curioufly difputcd , and alfo ftriued among thcmfclucs:
yet none except Plato,acknowlcdged the foucraignc good of man to
be his conioining with God. But what maner of conioining that was,
he could not pcrceiue fo much as with any fmale taft,and no maruel,
lith he had neuer learne d of the holy bondc thereof. To vs the only
and perfedfehcitie is knowc euen in this earthly wayfaringrbut, fuch
as daily more and more enkindleth our heartcs with dcfirc of it , till
the full enioyingc may fatisJie vs.Therefore I faid that none receiuc
friite of the benefites of Chnll, but they that lift vp their mindes to
Pl^'l J- the refurredio.For,Paulfectethvp this market© the faithfulljtoward
■ wiiic'n he faith that he endcuoreth , and forgetteth all things till he
come to it. And fomuch the more cherfuTly ought we totrauaill
towaide itjleaft if this world withholde vs,we fuflfcr greuous punifh-
ment for our fiothfulneffe. Wherefore in an other place he markcth
thefaithfull with this marke , that their conuerfation is in heauen,
from v/henfe alfo they looke for their (^uiour. And y their courages
fhould not faint in this race, he ioineth all creatures companies with
•them. For, becaufe eucry where arc feen deformed ruines , he faith
that all things in heauen & earth do endeuour to the renewing. For
^om.3. fijh Adam by his fall difTolued the perfed ordrc of nature to the
^' creatureSjtheir bondage is peinefull and greuous,whcrunto they arc
fubicdby reafon of the finne of man,not for that they are endued
with any feling, but for that they naturally couet thcperfedeftatc
from which they are fa'len.Thcrefore Paul faith that they grone,and
arc as in peine of childc bearing,that we to whom are gcucn the firft
frutes of the Spirit,may be afhamed to pine away in our corruption,
and not at the leaft to followc the dead clcments,which beare painc
of an others (Inne. And the more to pricke vs foryvard,he calleih the
laftcommingof Chrift our redemption. It is true in deede that all
the partes of our rcdcmptio are already fulHUed : but becaufe Chnft
hath
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 411
Jiath ones bene otieredfor llnnes , he fliallbe fecne againc without
iinne vnto faluation . With what miferiesfocucr we beprefTcd jlet Heb.ic.
thrs redemption fufteinc vs caen vntiU the performance of it.
5 The very weight of the thing it fclfe Diall whet our endeuor.
Forneither doth Paul without caufe aflBrme that the whole Gofpcl is i.Cor.
void and deceitfuU,vnlcfle the dead do rife againc : bccaufc our ftate M M*
lliould be more mifcrable than the ftate of all mcu , namely fith we
lieng open to the hatrcdes and reproches of many, are cuery hourc
in dangefjyea & arc as fliepc appointed to the llaughtcr : and there-
fore the authority thereof fliould fall away not only in one part, but
alfo in the whole fummc which both our adoption and the iffzCi of
our faluation cotcineth. And fo let vs be hedefully bent to this moft
carneft thing of all, that no continuance of time may make vs wery.
For which purpofe I hauc differrcd to this place that which I haddc
brcefcly to entreatc of it,that the readers may learnejwhen they hauc
receiucdChrift the author of their faluation,to rife vp hier,and may
knowe that he is clothed with heaucnly immortality and glorie, that
the whole body may be made hke fafhioned to the heade:as alfo the
holy Ghoft oftentimes fetteth forth in his perfon an example of the
refurredion.lt is a thing harde to be beleued,that bodies v/hen ihcy
haue bene confumed with rottenneflc, ftiall at their appointed time
nfc vp againe.Therefore where many of the Philofophers haue af-
firmed foules to be inimcrtall . the refurredio of the flefh hath bene
allowed of fewc ; wherin although there was no cxcufe , yet we arc
thereby put in mindc, that it is to harde thing to drawe mans fenfes
to beleue it.That faith may ouercome Co great a ftoppe,thc fcripture
ininiftreth two helpes:the one is in the likenes of Chriftjthe other is
the almightines of God. Nowe fo oft as the refurrcdion is thought
ofjlct the image of Chrift come into our mindes:which in y nature
that he tookc of vs, fo ranne out the race of mortall life , that nowe
hauingobteined immortalitie,he is to vs a pledge of the refurredio
to come.For in y miferics wherewith we are bcfeged,we carie about * ^^*
his mortifying in our flefh , that his life may be openly (hewed in vs.
And we may not feuere him from vs , neither can we poffibly , but
that he muft be torne in funder. Whcrupon commeth that argumct
of Paul, If the deade do not rife againe, then neither is Chrift rifen »Cor,
againe-.becaufe verily he takethy principle for confeftcd, ihatChnft *5*'5*
was not made fubied to death , nor obteined vidoric of death by
rifinge againe,priuatcly for him felfe : but,that that was begon in the
beade which muft necdes be fulfilled in all the mcmbrcs, aecordinge
to thp degree and ordre of euery one.For it were not right that tbey
FFF i?j
Cap.2 5. Of the maner how to rccciuc
Hi «^. fhould in all points be made egall with him. It is faid m the Pfalme.'
^» Thou (halt not fufFer they meke one to fee corruption. Ahhough a
portion of this truft pertcine to ^s according to the meafure of gift,
yet the full efted hath not appeared but in Chrift , which being free
from all rotting hath rcceiued againe his body whole. Nowe leaft the
hil.j. fcllowfhjpof blefledrefurrcdion with Chnft lliould be doutfull to
*• vSjthat we may be contented with this pledge , Paule exprefly affir-
meth that he therefore fitteth in heauen , and fhall come at tlic laft
day a ludgCj that he may make our bafe and vile body likefaRiioned
to his glorious body. In an other place alio he teachcth , thai God
raifed not vp his fonne from death to the cnrent to ihcwe a token of
his pov/er :buttortretch out the fame efFcduall force of the Spirit
toward vs which arc faithfuil : whom he therefore cnllcth life, while
he hueth in vs,becaufe he was geuen to this endc that he ihould make
aliue that which is mortall in vs. I knic vp in a brefe - bridgemet thoHe
thin^,s which might both be more largely handelcd and are worthy
to be more gorgeoufly fet out : and yet I trtft that the godly leaders
fliall in fewe words hnde matter enoui;h whici? may fufticc to cdific
V their faith.Chnft iherforc is rifcn 3gaine,that he might haue vs com-
panies of the life to come He was raifed vp of the father, in fo much
as he was y head of the Church,from which he doth in no wife fuffer
himfelfe to be plucked away . He w.is raifed vp by the power of the
Spirit , which is common to vs vmo the office of quickening. Finally
he was raifed vp,that he (hould be refurr ed 6 and life. But as we haue
faid thnt in this mirrour , there is to be feenc of vs a liucly image of
therefurredion,(oietit betovs a fure fubUace to ftay our minde,fo
thatyet wcbenotlothfuil or wcry of longt^ntng: bycaufeitis not
our part to meafure the feafons of times by our will , but patiently to
reftjtill God at his own fit. time rcpaire his kingdome.To which pur-
poft feemeth that exhortation of Paule.The fird frutes is Chrift:and
then rhey that are Chrift.s,euery one in his ordre.Buty no queliion
fliould be mbued of the refuriedion of Chrift , vpon which the re-
furredfonofysallis founded, we fe by howe many and how diucrfc
meanes he hath made it approucd by witncfle to vs. Fine nofed men
wil laugh at y hiftory which the Euangcliftcs rehearfe,as at a childifh
mockerie.For of what importacc fliall the meffage be whjchharcfull
filly women bring , snd afterward thedifciples confirme being in a
maner aftoniilicd? Why did not Chrift rather fct vp [he rriumphingc
enfignesof his vidoriein the middeft of the temple and the market
place? Why came he not forth terrible into the fight of Pilate? Why
<ioth he not alfo proue himfelf to the pricfts,and to whole Hicrufalc
that
The grace of Chrlft. Lib.;. 412
tliatheisrilcn vp aliueagaine? As for the witnrflTes which he chofe,
prophane nun will fcarfctly graunc them to be lufficienc. I aunfwer
that alchou;h in ihefe beginnings the weakenefife thereof was con-
temptiblcjyet all thii was gouernf d by the wonderful prouidcnce of
God:thjt p.irtly the louc oi Chrirt and^LcIe of godlineirc, and partly
their owac h Jrdnefle of bclefe lliould carry them in halt to the fe-
pulchre which hadl.itcly binedifinaied forfearcthat they might not
only be feing witnclTcsof y thing, but alfolTiould hcareofy Angels
that which they fawcwith their eyes.Howfhall we fufpedtherr ere*
ditjwho thought it to be a fable which they had heard of the wome,
till they were brought to the p^•e^ent fight of the thing it fclfe? As for
all the people and the Ruler himfelfjafier that they had bene largely
c6uinc?d,it is no maruell if as well the light of Chrift,as other %nes,
was not grauntcd the. The fepulchrc was fealed vp, the watchemen
warched ir,the third day the body was not found,The Ibldiours cor-
rupted with mony fcaticred a rumor f his Difciples had llolen him Mit.if
away. As though they had had power to gather a band together, or <» <-. anti
•had armure,or were pradifed men to enterprife any fuch fcate.It the *8•"•
foldiars had not courage enough to driue them away , why did they
not piirfuc them,ihat with the hclpe of the people they might haue
taken fome of them f Pilate therefore with his t ing trucly fealed the
refurre(ftion of Chril} : and the watchemen which were fee at the Ic-
pulchre both in their holding their peace and in theit licn5,were
made publifhcrs of the fame refurrevftion . In the meane time the
voice of Angels founded , He isrifen ,heis nothcre. Theheauenly
glifterjngplainelyfliewed that they were not men but Angels. After- I-uc.i^
ward, if there remained any douting, Chrift himfelfe tookeit away. ^*
The difciples fawe him ofter than ones , and alfo felt his feete and
his handes , and their hardnefie of bcleuing not a litle profited to
the ftrengthenmg of our faith. He difputeih among them of the mi-
Iteries of the kMV2.domc of God>and at the lad in their fightes behol-
ding him, he afcended intoheauen. And not onely this fight was AA.i.j
flicwed to the xi. Apoftlcs , but alfo he was feen at ones of mo than
fiue hundred btethtin. Nowe when he fcnt the holy Ghoft,hc i.Cor.
(hev/ed a lure proofe notoncly of hfe, butalfoof the fouereignc 15.6.
power:as he had fjid before, It is profitable for you that I ^orother- loh.itf.
wife the holy Gholt (hr.il not come. But nowe Paulc was ouerthro- '^^ ^ ^
wen by the wiy not by the ftrength of a dead man, but he felt him ^^ '^'
whom he perfecuted to h.iue mofthye power. To Stephan he ap-
peared for an other ende , namely thit with alTuredncs of life he
might ouercome the fcarc of dcath.To difcredit fomany autkcntike
F F F jiij
Cap.2 5. Of die maner how to reccmc
witnefles is, not oncly a parte of diftruftfulnefTc, but alfo of frowarde
and furious itubbourneffe.
4 This which we hauc faid, that in prouing the refurredion our
hil, J. fcnfes muft be direded to the infinite power of God, Paulebrefcljr
°* teachethjthat he may make (faith he)our vile body hkefalliioned to
the body of his brightncsiaccordingtothe working of his power,bjr
which he may fubdue all things to himfelfe. Wherefore nothing is
more vnmete,than here to haue refped what may naturally be done,
wher'e an ineftimablc miracle is fet before vs, which with f greatncs
thereof fwalloweth vp our fenfes.Yet Paul by fetting forth an exam-
ple of nature , reproueth their dulncs which deny the refurredion.
Thou foole(raithhe)that which thou foweft is not quickened vnleflTe
it firft dy.&c.Hc faith that in feede is fent a forn^c of the refurredio,
becaufe out of rottenncs groweth come. Neither were it fo harde a
thing to beleuc,if we were as hcedefuU as we ought to be to the mi-
racles which throughout all fhc coftes of the world do offer thcm-
felues to our eyes. But let vs remembre that none is trudy perfwaded
of the refurredion to Gome,but he which being rauirtied into admi*
Ci,i6. tation,geueth to the power of God his glory.Efaie lifted vp with this
y. affiance,crieth our, Thy deade lliallliue,my carcafe (liall rife againc»
Awake ye,& praifcjye dwellers of the duli In defpeircd cafe he lifteth
vp himfelfe to God the author of lifcjin whofe hande are the endes
fj.CH. ^^ death , as it is faid in the Pfalme. lob alfo being hker to a carrion
ib.1 j>. than to a man,trufting vpo the power of God fticketh not as though
S' he were whole and founde to lifte vp himfelfe to that day faying , I
knpAe that mv redeemer liueth;and in the laft day he fhall rife vpon
the dujl (namely to (hev/e forth his power therein) and I (hall againe
be compalfed with my rkinne,and in my flefhl fhall fee God , T (hall
fee him , and none other. For albeit that fome do futcely wrelte thefc
places,as though they ought not to bee vnderftande ofthercfurrec-
tion.yec they ftrengthen that which they couet to oucrthrowe : by-
cauie the holy mennc in their euels fecke comfortc from no where
els,thanfromthelikenefleof therefurrtdion. Which better appea-
reih by the place of Ezechiell. For when the lewes beleued not the
promife of their returne,and obieded that it was no more likely that
a way fhould be made open for them, than that deade menne fliould
te.j7 come out of their graue : there was a vifion lliewed to the Prophet,
a hclde full of dry bones :thofe the Lorde commaunded to take
againe flefh and iincwes. Although vnder that figure he raifeth vp
the people to hope of rcturne;yet the matter of hoping he gathereth
of the refurredion : as it is tovsan examplar of the dehuerances
which
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 415
which the faichfull do fcelc in this world.So Chrift,whcn he haddc Iohn.j.
taught tliai the voycc of the Gofpcll giucth hfe : becaufe the lewes ^7»
rccciucd not this,he byandby fayd further: Maruell not at this, be-
caufe the houre commcth in which all that are in the graues (hall
hearc the voycc of the fonnc of God,and Ihall come forth. Therforc
after this example of Paule, let vs already chercfullytriumphe in the j.-j-j
middclt of battels , becaufe he which hath promifcd hfe to come , is < ,
mighty to keepe that which is left with him ; and fo let vs glory that
a crowne of rightcoufneffe is layd vp for vs,which the iuft ludgc ihal
-dehuer vs.So fliall it come to pafTcjthat whatlocucr gricues we fuffer ,
ihey fhalbe to vs a rtie wingc of the life to come , becaufe it agrecth
with the nature of God to render afflidion to the wicked which af-
Hi<fl vs; but to vs which arevniuftly afflidcd, rclt at theappearinge of
Chrift with the Angels of his power , in a flame of firc.But that is to
be holden which headdcth byandby afterwarde, that he Ihall
come that he may be tlorihcd in his faintes, and be made won-
derful! in all them that haue bcleucd , becaufe the Gofpeil hath bin
beleued.
5 But although the minde s of men ought to haue bin continually
occupied in this liiidy:yet as though they would of fet purpofe dertioy
•all remembrance of the refurrcdion , they haue called death the vt-
•termoft bound of all things & the deRi udion of man.For verily Salo-
mon fpcaketh of the common and receiucd opinion, when he fayth ^^^'^-^
that a liuing dogge is better than a dead Li5. And in an other place:
Who knoweth whether the foule of a man go vpward,& the foule o( g^^j^ .
abeaft go downcwardrBut in all ages this brutifli fenflcscrrour hath it.
bin common in the world,yea & hath broken into the Church it felf:
for , the Sadduces haue prefumcd to profefle openly that there is no Mar.i j.
refurredion , yea and that foules are mortall. But that this groffei- i8.
gnorance /liould not help to excufe any manjthe infidels euen by vc- Luk. lo
ry inftind of nature haue alway had an image of the refurrcflion be- *^ , «
fore their eics. For to what purpofe fcrtied that holy and inuiolabic
maner of burying, but to be an earncft of new hfe' Neither may it be
anfwered that this fpring of errour: becaufe the religioufneffc of bu-
riall was alway in vre amonge the holy Fathers , and God willed the
fame maner to remainc among the GentileSjthat an image of the rc'
furredio fet before them might awake their drowfines.But alrhoush
that ceremony wanted his vfe ofprofiting,yet it is profitable for vs if
we wifely marke the end of if,becaufe it is no fdender confutationof
vnbcliefe,that altogether profefl'cd that which no man belcucd.But
Satan hath noc only aiionillied the fcnfcs of men , fo that they haue
Cap.2 J. Of the maner how to rcceiuc
buried with the bodies the remembrance of the relurredion, but al*
fo hath pradifed to corrupt ihis part of doftrine with diuerfe faincd
inuentions , that at length it might viterly die . I pafTc oucr howe ia
Paules time Satan began to pinch at itrbtit in a litle after there follo-
wed the MillenarieSjwhich hmited y rcigne of Chritt to a thoufandc
ycarcs.This crrour is fo childifh,thacit needeth not or is not worthy
Uu.io. of any confutation. Neither doth theReuclation make on their fide,
^' by which it is certaine tliat they coloured their crrour: forafmueh as
in the place where he mentioncth the number of a thoufand,he cn-
ircateth not of the eternal blefledaefle of the Churchy but only of the
diuers troubles which were to come vppon the Church, while it yet
trauailed in earth.But the whole Scripture crieth out that there flial-
bc no end of ihe bleffednefle of the eled, nor of the pumflimcnt of
the reprobate. Now of all thinges which both are hidden from our
fight and do farre pafle the capacity of our mindc , cither we muft
fetch the credit out of y certaine oracles of God , or we muft vtterly
caft it away.They which aiTigne to the children of God a thoufandc
yeres to enioy the inheritace of the life to come, do not marke how^
great a difhonor they do both to Chrift and his kingdom.For if they
(hall not be clothed with immortality:then neither is Chnft himfelf,
to whofe glory they flialbc newly fafhioned , receiucd into the im-
fnortall glory. If their bleffednefle fhali haue any end:then the king-
dome of Chriftjvpon the ftcdfaftnes whereof it ftandeth , cndurcth
but for a time. Finally cither they are moft vnskilfuU of all mat'cr co«
ccrning God,or they go about with crooked malicioufneffe to ouer-
throw the whole grace of God and power of Chnft , the fullillmgc
wherofis no otherwifc per fed,but when finne being blotted out &
death fw allowed vp,eternal life is fully rcftored.But very blmde men
may fee how fondly they play the fooles,which Lare that they iTiold
afcribe to God to great cruelty if the reprobate be c ondemned to e-
ucrlafting paines.The Lord forfooth Ihall do wroniie,if he deny his
kingdome to them which haue by their vnthankefuinclle made the-
felues vnworthy of it.But(fay they)their finnes endure but for a time
I graunt : but the maiefty,yea and the ri ihteoufncffe of God, which
they haue offended by finning,is eternall. Worthily therefore the re-
membrance of iniquity dieth not:But fo the paine exccdeth the me-
furc of the fault.This is a bla(phemy not to be fuffred.when the ma-
icfty of God is (6 litle fet by,when*rhe defpiling thereof is cfteemed
at no greater value than thcdeftrudinn ofonefoule.But let vsleaue
thefe trifles ,Ieaft 9?i«trary to that which we haue before fayd , we
may fccmc to iudgc their dotages worthy of confutation.
6 Befide
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3, 414
6 Bcfide thele,rhcic haue bin two other docing crrours brought
in by men pcrucrfly curious. The one forte thought, as though the
whole man dted^that the foules ihall rife againc with the bodies.Thc
other forarmuch as they graunt that the Joules be immortall fpiritcs,
fay that they llialbe clothed with new bodics:whereby they deny the
rcfuncdiooFiheflclh.Ofthefirf^fortjbecaufe I haue touched fom-
what in fpcakin^^of the creation of man, it ihalbc enough for me to
warne the readers againe,how bcalily an errour it is to make of a fpi-
rit fafliioned after the image of God , a vaniihingc hUH which doih
nothing but quickc the body in this frailc life:& to bring the temple
of the holy Gholl to notiiing: Finally to fpoyle that part of vs wher-
in diuinencfle chiefcly iTiineth and marks of immo; tality appcare,to
fpoyle it([ fay)ofthis gifc : fo ihattlie cft.itc of the body Ih.oulde be
better & more excellent than the elbtc of the foulc. The Scriprurc
teacheth fai re otherwife,which compareth the body to a coraL;e,out
of which It fayeihihatwc remouc when we die,, bccaufejt eftec-
mcth vs by that part whichmakcth vs differinge from brute bciflf s.
So Peter beingc me to death, fayth that the time is come, when he i.Pe. t,
muftlay away his tent. And Paule fpcakinge of the faithfull,aftcrthat 14^
he hath fayd : That when our earthly houfe fnalbc diflolued, there is -■<-or.5
a buildingefor vs inhcauen adioyn°ththat we are wayfaringe from
the Lord fo long as we abide in t!ic bo.ly, butdodefire the prcfcncc
of God in the abfcence of the body. Il the loulcs i\o not oucilmc the
bo Jics, what is it that hath God prcfent when it is fcucrcd from the
body ? But the Apoftle taketh away all doutinge , when he teacheth
that we arc lovne-d in fcUowlhip to the fpirites ofthe righteous. By "^''•'^
which words he iheweih.that we are loyned in fcUowlliip to the ho-
ly fachcrs,v/hich euen beinq dead do kcpc tlie fame godlincflc with
V5,fo that we can not be the members ofChrift vnlelfc we grow to-
gether with them. VnlcfTe aifo the foules being vnclothed of tb: bo-
dies, xlidkcepc ftill their fubft nice and were able to receiueblclfed
glory, Chrilt would not hauj fayd to the thiefe : This day thou (halt luk. >|
be with me in paradif-'.Hauinge fo clcarc teitimonies,let vs not dout 4J'
after the example oF Chrilt when we arc dyinge , to commende oar
foules to GodjOr after the example of Stephen to commit them to Ad 7,
Chrilt to keepe , which not vnworthily is called a faiihfull lliepcherd 59-
and Bifl^op of them.To cnquii e of their meane ftate , is neither law- ^ ' *'
ful nor e^pedient.Many do much comber themfelues with difputing
what place they kepe, and whether ihev do now cnioy the heauen-
ly glory or no. But it is fvlly and rafhncfle, to fearch dcepclier of vn-
knowen thinges.than God doih giuc vs Icauc to knowc. When the
Cap.2y. Of the maner howto receiuc
Mat.5.8 Scripture hath fayd that Chrift is prefent with them, andreceiueth
and a 6. ^hem into paradife that they may enioy comfort,on y other fide thac
o^i.i 2. ^^^ foules of the reprobate do fufFer fuch paines as they haue defer-
ucdrit gbeth no further. What teacher or maifter (hall now open to
vs that which God hath hidden? Of the place,the queftion is no leflc
fonde and vaine : forafaiuch as we know that there is not the fame
dimenfion of the foule which is of the body. Whereas the bleffed
gathering together of holy fpirits is called tlic bofome of Abraham,
it is enough for vs after this wayfaringe to be receiued of the com-
mon father of the faithfull , that he may communicate with vs the
frutc of his faith. In the meane time fith the Scripture cuery where
i)iddcth vs to hang vpon the expedation of Chriftes comminge, and
differrcth the crowne of glorie till then : let vs be content with ihefe
bondes appointed vs of God:namely,that the foules of the godly ba-
iling ended the labor of their warfare do go into a bleffed reft, where
with happy ioyfulnefle they looke for the enioyinge of the promifed
glory : arid that fo all thinges are holden in fufpenfc till Chrift the re-
deemer appeare. As for the rcprobate,it is no dout that they haue the
Xad.1.6 fame eftate which lude affigneth to the Deuils , to be holden boundc
with cheineSjtill they be drawen to the punifhment whereunio they
are condemned.
7 No lefle monftruous is their crrour, which imagine that foules
Ihall not rccciue againe the fame bodies wherwith they arc now clo-»
^ thedjbut (hal haue new and other bodies. And the reafon of the Ma*
nichees was very triflinge,that is,that it is riot meete that flefh which
is vncleane fhould rife againe. As though there were no vncleannes
of foules, which yet they debarred not from the hope of euerlaftingc
life.It was therefore all one as if they (hould fay that that which is in-
fcftcd with the filth of finnc can not be cleanfed by God. For I nowc
pafle ouer that dotage , y flefh was naturally vncleane, becaufe it was
create of the DcuilhOnely I fliew that whatfoeuer is nowe in vs vn-
worthy ofheauen,ithinderethnot the refurredion.Andfirft wheras
i.Cor.7 Paule biddeth the faithfull to cleanfe themfelues from all defilinge of
'■^ -theflcfhe andof theSpirite, thereupon followeththe iudgement
,j\ * which he in an other place pronoucethjthat euery man flial receiue
by his body either good or cuill . Wherewith agreeth that which he
i.Cor.4 wryteth to the Corinthians , That the life of lefus Chrift may be o-
' ^- penly (hewed in our mortall flefh.For which reafon in an other place
[.The. 5 j^g JqjJ^ j^q jp^g pj-gy ^^ ^^ Q^^ oreferue the bodies whole vnto the
day ofChriftjthan the foules and fpiritcs. Andnomarucll,becaufcit
were a moft great abfurdity that the bodies which God ha|h dedicate
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 415
to be temples tohimfcUc, iTioulde fall awny into rotrcnnefiTc with-
ouchopeofrilingcagaine. Whatfay wetothiSjthattheyarcalfothc iCor.6
members of Chrill f chat God commaundcth all the partes of them ' ^
tobcfandificd tohimfelfc ? thathc wiUeth hisname tobe praifcdj' ""**
with tongues,pure handcs to be lifted vp to him,facrifices to be offe-
red ? What madncfle is it therefore that that part to which the hea-
uerily iudge hath vouchefaued to grauntfo great honor , (houlde be
brought from a mortal man into duft without any hope of rcftoring?
Likcwife when Paulecxhortcthvs to fufl'er the Lord as well in body ^ -
as in foule , becaufc both belong to God,vetily he fiift'ercth not that ,j,^
which he chalengeth to God as holyjto be adiudged to cternall rot-
tenneflc . Neither is there a plainer determmation of the Scripture
for any thing, than for the rifing againc of this flcfh which we bcare.
This corruptible (fay thPaulc ) muft putonvncorruprion,and this
morcall muft put on immortality.If Goci did make new bodies, where '■^^^•
is this changing ofquahty? Ifithadbin faydthatwemuft berenued, '*'''
the doutful fpech paraduenture mought haue giucnoccafion to their
cauillation . But nowe when poyntingc with his finger to the bodies r^.i^,
wherewith we arc clothed, he promifcth to them vncorruption , hcn.
plainely enough denieth any new bodies to be made.Yea nc couldc
not(fayth Tertullian)fpeake more plainly, vnlefle he had holdcn his
ownc skinne in his hande. And they can by no cauillation efcape fro
this , that where in an other place he fayth that Chrift ftialbc y iudge
of the worlde , he alleageth this tcftimony of Efay , I Hue (fayth the Efa. 45,
Lord)cuery knee fhal bow to merfor as much as he plainly pronoun- *<•
ceth y they to whom he fpcaketh (halbe fubied to yeeld an accompt
of their life:which couJd not agree,if new bodies fhoulde be brought
before the iudgement feate.Now in the words of DanicU there is no ^
doutfuJneire-.And many of them ihatflepein the earth of duft , fball
awake,fome to eternall life, and fome to reproches and to euerlafting
contcmpt:fith he fetcheth not new matter out of the foure elementes
to make men,but calleth dead men out of their graues. And this very
plaine refon teacheih.For if mortality which tookc beginning at the
fall of man,be accidentalhthen the repayring,which Chrift brought,
f)ertaincth to the fame body which beganne to be mortall. And true-
y, whereas the Athenians laughed when Paule affirmed therefiirre-
ftion,thereupon we may gather what maner of refurredion he prea-
xhed:and that fame laughinge not finally auailcth to ftrengthen our
faith.The faying of Chrift alfo is worthy to be ncted;Fcarc not them ^^^ .^
which kill the body, and cannotkill the foule : but fcare him which 18.
can throwc both the foule aod the body into hell of rii c , For there
Cap. 25. Of the maner liowto receive
is no caufe to fcarc, vnlcfle the body which we news bearc be fii!>-
bhn.j. i^^'to punilliment, Anciftokfil'pbine is an othor fayingc of the
,S. lame Chril>,The hourc commeth, when all they chat are in graucs,
fhal hearc the voice ofthe fonnt ofGod,& iTial come for:h:chey thac
haue done goodjinto the rerurie<fiion of hferbu: they that haue done
cuill, into c ie rcfuircilion of iudgcnicnt. Shall we fay that foules reft
in the grades, that they lying there may heare Chriftj' and not rather
that at his commaundemenc the bodies niallrcturnc into the l»ue!i-
nes which they had loft ? Moreouer if we llial) haue new bodies giue
vs, where is the like falhioning ofthe head and the members? Chrift
, rofe againc : wa5 it with forgmg to himfcife a new body ? No, but as
^ ' * he had faid before,Deftioy this temp]c,and in three daycs I wil build
it vp ; he looke againe thefame body which he hadde before borne
mortall,For he bad not much profited vs, if a new body beiag put in
place , y old body had bin deftroicd which was offred vp far a facri-
fice of fatisfadory cleanlingc. We muft ahb holdc fait that felowlliip
i.Cor. which the Apoltle preachech ? That we nfe againe , becaufe Chrift
*i'^ *' hath rifen againerfor nothing is Kife probable than thatcur flefh in
which w^c bcare about the mortifymge of Chrift, fliould be depriucd
ofthe rcfurreCtiootGhFift. Which verily appeared by a notable ex*
Mjt.17. amplc,whenatynlmg againe of Chift. many,bodics ofthe Saintes
J*» . came out ofthe graues. Font can not be denied that this was a forc-
Candi- fj^ewingjor rather an earneft of the laft refurredion which we hope
meclo forifuchas was before in Hnoch and Elias , whonicTertullian cal-
thed in leth New pcfleflbrsofthc rclurrcdion : becaufe they being in body
white, & foule deliuered from coiruption , were receiued into the keping
ihcRo- ^ ^^^ afhained in fo dearc a matter to fpende fo many wordes^:
tttatnes but the readers (hall contentedly bcare this trouble with me, that no
they hole may be open for frowarde and boldc wittes to deceiue the fim-
^*'^^ pie. The ftemge fpirites with whom I now difputCjbriivg fcw^th a fai-
futers ^*^^ inuention of their ownc braine,that at y refurredion there fliaU
or new bi- a creation of new bodies. What rcafon moueth them to thinke fo,
ly cL'. bjt becaufe it feemeth to them incredible , that a canon confumcd
ft:d in- yvith ff) ]oncT rottenncs (hould returnc into his aunciet ftate^Thcrforc
|j° ° ' only vnbehefe is the mother of this opinion.But vs on y other fide
Colo.s. the Spirit of God ech where in the Scripture cxhorteth to hope foe
I it the refurrcdion of our flefti.For this reafon baptifmc(3S Paul witnef-
j^. feth)is to vs a feale ofthe rcfurrcdion to come:and likewifc the holy
Supper allureth vs tothetruft thereof, when wc rcceiuewith out
mouth the Signcs of fpirituall grace. And irucly the whole exhorta-
tion
Tnc grace of Ch rift, Lib.3. 41^
lion of Paulc, mat we giue our members to be weapons vnto the o- a.Cor.tf
bedicnceofrightcourneflc, fhoulde be colde vnldfc thatwcrcioy- '♦•^n'^ 7
ncd which he addcth afterwardc , He tiiat hath raifed vp Chrift from "*' *
the deadc , fliall quicken ah'o your mortall bodies. For, what fhouldc
it proHic to apphe our feete , handes , eyes , and tongues vnto the
fcruicc of God, vnlcffcthey were partakers of the frutc and re-
wardc ? Which thingc Paulc plaincly confiimcth with his ownc i.Cor.4
wordes/ayinge; The body not to fornicationjbuccotheLord rand iz.&»5
the Lord to the body . And he that hath raifcd vpChriil, {hallaifo'^.
raife vp vs by his power . More playne arc thofe wordes which fol-
lowe:th3t our bodies arc the temples of the holy Ghoft & the mem-
bers of Chrift . In the mcane time we fee howe he ioyncth ihc rc-
rurre(ftion with chaftitic and holincflc , as a hdc after he faycth that
the price of redemption pertaineth alfo to the bodies. Now it were
not rcafonable that the body of Paulc , in which he hath borne the <^at4.tf,
printes of Chrift , and in which he honorably glorified Chrift,fhould ^7»
joorethcrewardeofthc crownc . Whereupon alfo came that glo- p....
ryinge , We lookc for the redeemer from heaucn, which ft)all make j, * '* ''
our vile body Iikefaftiioned to the body of his bnghtncs. And if this
be true , that we muft by many afflidions enter into the kingdom of Ad. 14.
God,no reafon fuflfieth to dobarre the bodies from this entry,which »».
God both excrcifeth viider the ftandard of the crofle,3nd honoreth
with the praife of viftory.Thereforc of this mattes there arofe amog
the Saintes no doutmge, but that they hoped to be companions of
Chriltjwhtch remoueth into his own jscrfon all the afflidions whcr-
with we are proued,to tcache that they bring life. Yea and vnder the
law he exercilcd ihe holy fathers in this faith with an outward cere-
mony.For to what purpofe ferued the vfage of buryingc,3S we hauc
alrcdy (hewed, but that they fhoiild know that there is new life pre-
pared for the bodies that are layd vp <? Hereunto alfo tended the fpi-
ccs & other lignes of immortality,wherewith vnder y law the darkc-
ncfle of faith was holpen cuen as it was by the facrifices.Neither was
that maner brcddc by fuperftition,forafmuch as we fee that the Spi-
rircdoth nolc/Ie diligently rehcarjc burialles than the chicfc my-
ft ries offayth. And Chrift commcndcth ihatworkeas a fpcciall jVfat itf
worke , truely for none other reafon but becaufe it lifteth vp our eyes 10. '
from beholding of the graue which corruptcth & deftroyeth al,to the
fight of the renuinge . Moreouer the fo diligent obferuinge of the
ceremony which is praifcd in the Fathers, fufficiently proueth that it
was to them a rare and ptctious help of faith. For neither would A- Genij
traham hauc fo carefully prouidcd for the burying place of his wife, 4.5c 1 j
Cap.25. Of themanerhowtoreceiue
vnleife there had bin fet before his eyes a religion and a proficc hyer
than the world, namely that garniflnnge the deade body of his wife
with the (ignes of the refurrei^ion he might confirme both his ownc
3<;n.47 faith and the faith of his houfchold.But a clearer proofe of this thing
^*^* appeareth in the example of lacob, which to tefttfie to his poftenty
that the hope of the promifedlande was not eucn by death failcn
out of his mindc , commaunded his bones to be caried thither. 1 be-
fecch you, if he was to be clothed with a ncwe body, llioulde he not
haue giuen a fonde commaundement concerninge duft that fhouldc'
be brought to nothinge f Wherefore if their authority of the Scrip-
ture be ofany force with vs, there can be required of no doiftrine ei-*
ther a more cleare or more certaine proofe . For this euen children,
ynderftande by the wordes ofRefurre<ftion,and raifing vp againe.For
neither can we call it the Rcfurredion of that which is now fii tt crea-
tofin. 6 ted, neither (houlde that faying of Chrift ftande faft, Whatfocuer the
J^' Father hath giuen me,it {hall not penflijbut I wiUraifeitvp in the Lift-
day. To the fame puipofe feiueth the word of Sleping,which perrai-
ncth only to the bodies.Whereupon alfo burying places were calh d
Coemeteria, Sleping places. Noweitremaineththatllpcal^c fome
1 .Cor. what of the maner of the refurredion. I vfe this word, becaufe Paule
15.51. calling it a miftery,exhorteth vs to fobrietVjand bridleih the liberty
to difpute like Philofopheis ff eely & futrelly of it.Firft we muft hold,
as we haue fayd , that we fhall rife againe in the fame flefh which we-
beare,as touching the fubftace,but the quality fhalbc other. As whc
the fame flc/h of Chrift which had bin oftied for facrificCy was railed
vp againe, yctit excelled in other qualities as if it had bin altogether
an other flcfh. Which thing Paule declareth by familiar example*. For'
as there is all one fubftanceoftheflellieof a man , andofabeaftj
but not all one quality : as all ftarres haue like matter, but not like
brightncflfetfo he teacheth that though we fhall kepe ftill thefubftaoc^
of our body, yet there Ihalbe a change , that the ftatc of it may be
much more excellent . The body therefore , that we may be raifcd;
vp againejflial not periOi nor vanidi away:but putting of corruption,
itfliall put on vncorruption . But forafmuch as God hath all the elc-
mentes ready at his becke,no hardineflc fhall hinder him,but that he
may commaunde both the earth and waters and fier , to render that
ECi.26. which feemcth to be confumed by them. Which alfo Efay teftifieth
>«. though not without a figurc,where he fayth,BehoIde,the Lorde {hall
go forth of his place, that he may vifit the inquity of the earth: & the
earth (hall difcouer her bloode, and fhall no more hide her dead. But
there is to be noted a difference bee wcne them that haue bin deade
longc
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3, 417
longe beforehand thofewhomih.itdny (IidU finde aliuc. Forvvc fhall 'Cor,
not all flcpe (as Paul layth) but wc fliali all be changcdrthac is lo fay, * 5- S «•
iclhnllnotbcof neccfiltic iIul there be a diftance of timebetwcne
death and the beginning of the fecond life:becrufe in a moment of
nme,and in the twmclmgc of an cyc,the foundc of tlie trompet rtull
pcaice.to raifc vp the dcadc vncorruptible,& with a fodaine change
to falliionagsine the lining mto the l.mie glory So in an other place i.Tbe.
be comfortcth the fnithfiiil which muft die : bccaufe they which fliall 1 5.
then remaine aliuc fhal not go before the dcad,but rather they dial
firrt rile againe which haue flcpt m Chrift. If ?.ny obieft that fayinge ^c^^.*
of the Apoftlcjthatit is appointed to allmortallmenonesto die,it is *^'
calic to anlwcre it with faying that when the ftatc of nature is chan-
gcd,itis akmdf of deaibjandr fiitely fo called. And therefore thefc
things agree wel togcther,rhat all l*halbc rcnued by death when they
fiiall put of their mottall body : and yet that it is not ncccfijry that
there b." a i'c iieringe of the body arudihc foule where there Ihalbc a
, roJaine changing.
9 But here ariTcth a harder qucftion.by what right the rcfurrcdio
whicii is the fingular benefit of Chrift is common alio to the wicked
andthcaccuifcd of God. We knowe that all were in Adam condcm- i^Kn
nedto death.-Chnft came the rcfurredio &Lfe. Came he to giue life *5*
to all mankinde vniuerfiUy without choife ? But what is more againft
rcafon , thin that they ("houide by their obftinatc bhndencfic obcainc
that which the godly worft>ippeis of God do obtaine by oncly hvhf
Yet this rcmaincih certainc, that there fhalbe one refuricdion of
iudgement,and an orhcr refurrcdion oflife,& that Chrift ftial come Mat. 15
tofcucrc the Lambes frothe Goatcs. lanfwcrc,that this ought not 3».
10 feemc ftrangc j the likencfTe whereof wc fee in dayly experience.
Wc (ce that in Adam wc were depriued of the inheritance of the
whole world,and that we are by no leffe iufte rcafon debarred from
common foode,than from the eating of the tree of life.Whenfe then
commcth it to p.ifle, that Cod doth not onely make his funne to rife Matt, j
vpon the good and euill, but al.'o as touching the vfesofthis prefcnt 45*
hfe, his ineftimable liberality continually floweth forth to them with
large plentuoufncfte ? Hereby verily wc knowe that thofe thingcs
which properly belonge to Chrift and his members , do alfo oucr-
flow CO the wicked ; not that it is their rightfull pofleflion , but that
they may be made y more inexculable.So the wicked do ofrentimci
finde God bencficialljby more than meanc proucs,yea fuch as fomc*
time do darken all the bltftinges of the Godly , but yet do turnc to
cheir greater damnation. If any man obied, that the reiuriedionis
GGO
Cap.2 5« ^^ the mancr how to rcceiue
not hcly compare-d Co fadingc and earthly bencfices:here alio I aun-'
fwcre that (o foone as they were cftranged from God the fountainc
of life,thcy deferued the death of the Deuiil, whereby they fhouldc
be vtterly deftroyed : Yet by the matuelous counfell of God there
was found a meane ftate that out of life they might liuc in death.No
more abfurdity ought it to fccmcjif the refurredio happen to the wic-
ked , which dravveth them againft their willes to the iudgement featc
of Chrift , whom now they refufe to Iiearc for their mailter and tea-
cher . For it were a fmall paine to be confumed away with death, if
they were not,to fuffer punifhment for their obftinacy , brought be-
fore the iudge, whofe vengeance they hauc without cnde and mea-
fure prouoked againft themfelues . But although we muft holde that
;.a4, which we haue (ayd,and which that notable confeffion of Paul be-
fore Felix containeth,that he iooketh for y refurredion of the righ-
teous and wicked : yet the Scripture oftentimes fetteth foorth elc-
dion together with the heauenly glory to the only children of God :
Becaufe Chrift properly came not to the dcftrudion , but to the faU .
uation of the world.Thereforc in the Crcedc there is made mention
ofchc blcfTedhfe only.
.J lo But forafmuch as the Prophecy of death fwallowcd vp by vi-
ftory > Hiall then and not till then be fulfilled : let vs alway haue in
*or. minde the etcrnall fchcity,the endc of the rcfurre6iion:of the cxcel-
54' lency whereof,if all thingcs were fpoken which the tongues of men
were able to fpeake,yet fcarcely the fmalleft parcell thereof fliouldc
be exprelTed . For howefoeuer we truely hearc that the kingdome of
God Ihalbc fluffed full with brightneffe, ioy , felicity , and Jory : yet
thofc chingcs that are fpoken of are moft farrc remoueA from our
fenfe > and remaine as it were wrapped in darke fpcachcs, vntillthac
day come when he himfelfe fhall giue to vs his glory to be feene face
ojj, , to face.We know(faith Iohn)that we arc the children of Godi but it
hath not yet appeared.But when we ftialbe like to him,thcn we Ihall
fee him fuch as he is.Wherefore the Prcphetes, becaufe they could
by no wordes expreflfe the fpiritual bicfledncfi'e in it felfe,did in a ma-
ner grofly portray it out vnder bodily thingcs . But forafmuch as the
fcruentneflc of defire muft with fome taft of that fwetenefle be kind-
led in vs, let vs chiefely continue in this thoughtjy if God do as a ccr-
lainc fountaine which can not be drawen drie , containe in him the
fulncfte of all good thinges,nothinge is beyonde him to be coueted
of them that tende towardc the foueraigne good and the full perfe-
,_ J- dion of felicity : as we are taught in many places , Abraham , I am
thy rcwardecxcecdingc great, Wuh which fay inge accordethDa-
uid.
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3.^ 418
ui<!, The Lord is my portion, the lot hath very well fallen to me. A- PHi.i <
gainc in an other place, 1 llialbe fatisfied with thy countenance. But ^
Peter pronounccth that the faithfull are called to this cndjthat they
may be made partakers of the nature of God. Howe fo ? becaufc he i.Pcr,
ftialbc glorified in all his faintcSjand flialbe made wonderful in them 4.
that haue beleucd.If the Lord will enterpartcn his glory,power,3nd
righeoufncs with his clcd, yea and will giuc himfelfe to them to be
cnioyed, and(which is better) Will after a ccrraine maner grow into
one with them:let vs remember that vndcr this benefit is contained
all kinde of felicity. And when we haue much profited in this medi-
tation , let vs rcknowlcdge that wc yet ftay bcncih at the bortome of
the rooteSjif the conceiuing of our mindc be coparcd with the hi.;h-
ncffe of this miltery . Wherefore in this behalfe we mutt keepe fo^
bricty, leaft with how much greater boldnefle wc fliall flie vp on hie
beingc vnmindefullof our ownefmallmeafurc, fo ranch more the
brightncflc of the heauenly glory ouerwhelmc vs.We fceie alfo how
the vnmcafurable gredmefle to know more than is lawcfull,ticklcth
vs:frora whenfe both tnflingc and hurtful! queftions do fpring from
time to time: triflmg I call thofe of which there can no profit be ga-
thercd.But this lecond kmd is worfe,becaufe they .which giue them-
felucs tothem,do entangle themfelues with pernicious fpeculatios,
and therefore Icall themhurtcfull. That which the Scriptures do
teach, ought to be out of all dout with vs.-namely that as God diuerfly
diftributinge his giftes to the Saintes in this worldc jdoth vnequaU
ly enlighten them, fo the meafure of glorie fliall not be cquall in hea^
uen where God (hal crowne his gifts. For neither doth this bclongc
indifferently to all which Paule fayth , Ye are my glorie and crowne i.The
inthcday of Chrift : nor alfo thatfayingeof Chrift to the Apoftlcs: a. 19.
Yefhallfit iudginge the twelue tribes of Ifraell. But Paule (which '^'*^"'
knewc that as God enricheth the holy ones with fpirituall giftcs in * *
earth , fo he beautifieih them with glorie in heauen ) doutcth not
that there is a pecJuHar crowne layd vppe for him accordingc to the
rate of his labours. And Chrift to fei forth to the Apoftles the digni-
ty of the office which they did bearctelleth them that the frute ther-
of is layd vp for them in heauen . So Daniell alfo fayth, But the wile Dan.i
fliall fliine as the brightncfte of the firmament , and they which iur J*
ilifiemany , as Starres to the worldes endc and for euer. And if a
manne heedefully confiderihe Scriptures, they do notonelypro-
mifc cternall life to the faithful , but alfo fpcciall reward to euer)' one.
Whereupon commeth that fayingc of Paule , The Lorde render to ^1^,^
him in that day. Which the promifc of Chrift confirmeth , Yc iTialjl i^
GOG ij
Cap.25. Of themanerhowtorccciuc
''^9 rcceinea hundred folde in the cternall life . Finally as Chnft begins
neth in this vvcrlde the glory of his body with manifolde diuerJity of
giftc-,and encreafeth it by degreesrfo he (hall alfo make it perfedin
hcauen.
1 1 But as all the godly will rccciue this with one confentjbecaufc
it is fiifficienily tcftiht d by the word of Godrfo on the other lide lea-
uing crabbed quellions,which they (h:ill know to be a hinderarrce to
them, ihty Will not pafTe their appointed boundts. As for my parte,
1 do not onely pnuatcly forbeare fupcifluous fearchinge of vnprofi-
table thinges , burl alfo thinke that I oiight to beware that 1 do not
with aunfvveringe nourifhcthelightneifeofotlier . Mennc hungrie
of vayne knowledge doaske howe great (hail be the diftance bc-
twcne the Prophetes and the Apoftles , and agayne betwcne the A-
poftlcs and the Martyrs : howe many degrees Virgincs differ from
imaried folkes : Hnallythey leaue no corner of heaucn vnfearched.
Then it commeth in their mindes to enquire to what purpofe ferueih
the repairinge of the worlde, fith the children of God Ihal neede no-
tbingeof all this fo great and incomparable plenty : but fhalbe likd
TO the Angels , whofe not eatingcis a Signe of the eternall bh fled-
rtefl'e. But I atinfwere that in the very fight there Hial be fo great plca-
fauntncfle , fo great fwcetencffe in the onely knowledge without any
vfe , that this felicity (hall farre paffe all the helpcs wherewith we be
nowe holpen . Lctte vs imagme our felucs to be fette in the moft
wealthy coaft of the worlde, and where we fliall want no pleafurc:yec
V^ho is there whome his fickenelTe do not fometime hinder and not
HtfFcr to vfe rhe beneBtes of God ? Whois there whofe courfe his
ownc intemperance doth not oft brcake in funder?" Whereupon folo-
wcththataclcarcenioyin<jeand pure from .nil fault , although there
ben6 vfe of corruptible hfcjis the perfedion of felicity. Some go fur-
ther and asl-re whether droffc and other corruptions in metalles , be
not farre from reftonngc and are contrary ro it. Which though in
ji. 8. fome refped I graunt them , yet I looke with Paule for the reparingc
t>f thcfe faultes which tooke their bcginnioge at (innc , towardc
which repayringe they grone and arc in trauailc . Yet thfey proccedc
fimher , and aske what better eftate is prepared for mannc , (ith the
blcflingeofiflbe fliallthcnbe atan ende . This knotis ahbcaficto
be loofcd. Whereas the Scripture fo honorably fctteth out ihat kindc
of bleffinge , that is referred to the encreafces wherewith God con-
tinually draweth forwarde the o'.dcrof nnturc herrharke ; but in the
pferfedion it is knowcn that ihefc'is an other manner ; But fith the
vnware arc cafily taken with aliuremcntes , and the^the maze dra*
wcth
The grace of Chrift. Lib.3. 41^.
V9'«li them in dccplicr , and at length when cucry manncs ucuifcs
plcafc himfelfe there is no end of i^riuingc : therefore let this be a
[liorcc way for vs , to be contented with the glaffe and darke fpeJch
vntill wc ihall fee face to face . For fcwe of a great multitude care
which way they may go to heaucnrbut z\\ do before their time couet
to know what is done there. All beinge commonly fluggifli and flow
to enter into battels, do already paint out to thcmlclucs imagined
triumphcs.
1 z Now becaufc no defcription can matthc the gricuoufncfle of j^. .
the vengeance of God vppon the reprobate , their tormentesand 12.&2
paines are figured to vs by bodily thinges.Hamely bydaikcnes, we- i?.
pinge, gnalliingc of teeth , vnquencheable fier , and a worme cnde- ^jrc.;
leflcly gnawing'the heart.For by fuch mancrs offpeech it is certainc '*^*
that the holy Ghofl: meant to trouble all our fenfes with horrour :
as when it is faydthat there is prepared from eternity adeepcHell, ^^^ ^^
that the nourifhmentes thereof are fire and much woode : that the ***
blaft ofche Lord.c,as a ftrcame of brimftone,dotli fet it on fier. As by r,r
fuch thinges we muft be holpcn after a certaine maner to conceiuc ,,
the miferable ftatc of the wicked , fo we ought chiefely to faiten our
thought vpon this howc wretched a ihinge ic is to be eftranged from
the fcllowfhippe of God : and not that oncly , bur alfo to feele the
maiefty of God fo bent againft thee , that thou canft not efcape but
be fart drained of it. Forfiifthis difplcafure is like a moft violent fier,
with touchingc whereof all thinges are deuoured and fwallowed vp.
Then, all creatures fo fcrue him to execute his iudgement, that they
to whom the Lord fliall fo fhew his wrathjfbal fcle the heauenjcarth,
fcaiandbeaftesjas it were with cruell indignation cmflamedagainft
them and armed to their dettrodion. Wherefore it is no fmall thinge
that the Apolile pronounccth when he fayth that the vnbeleuingc i.Thc.i
fhall fuffer etcrnall punilhmentby dyinge from the face of the Lord, 9*
and from the glory of his power. And fo oft as the Prophc'cs do caft
vs in feare with bodily figures , although they fpeake norhingc ex-
ccfliuely for our dulncflfc, yet they adJe forefhewingcs of the iudge-
ment CO come , in the funnc and the moone and the whole frame of
the world. Wherefore the vnhappy confcienccs do finde no reft, from
b(^g vexed and toflcd with a terrible whirlewinde, fro feeling thcm-
felues tobetorncinpeeces by Godbeingc angirly bent againft them,
from being pcarccd and Inunccd with deadly ftinges, from trembling
atthelightcningcofGod,andbt'inge broofed with the weight of hit
hand:fo that it is much more eafc to enter into al bottomlcs dcpthct
and dcuourmgc pittes, than to (landc one moment in thofe tcrroun.
G G G iij
Cap.i . Of the outward mcanes
What and how great then is this, to be prcfled with eucrlafting and
ncucr ceafling fiege of him ? Of which thing the 90. Pfalmc contai-
neih 2 notable fentence : that although with only fight he fcattcr a-
broade all moitall men and hringc them to nought, yet his worfhip-
pcrs,ho w much more fearefull they are in the worldc/o much more
he cnforceth them and pricketh them forward lodcn with the croffc,
vniill he be all in all.
THE FOVRTH BOOKE
OF THE INSTITVTION OF
CHRISTIAN RELIGION, WHICH
intrcateth of the outward meanes
or helpeSjWhercby God allureth
vs into the fclowshippcof
Chrift and holdcth vs
therein.
The firft Chapter.
Oftht true Church with which we ought to kepe vnity Jitecaufe
it is the mother of all thfged^j.
C^O/€P> f' Hat by Faith of the Gofpel Chrif! is become ourcs,
". & we be made pnrtakers of the faluation brought by
him & of eternal blcHedncSjis already declared in the
laft booke. But bccaufe our rudencllc, and flothful-
neG'e,yea and vanity of wit,do nede outward hclpes
whereby Faith in vs may both be c.n!:endred, and
grow and cncreafc in proceeding toward the markc wherumo it tcn»
deth:God hath alfo added them therby to prouide for our weakencs.
And that the Preaching of the Gofpel might florifh,hc hath left this
'^c.4 trcafurc with the Church . He hath appomtcd Paftors and teachers,
by whofe mouth he might teach them that be his : he hath furnifhed
them with authority ,finally he hath left nothing vndonc that might
auaile to the holy confent of faith and right ordcr.Firft of all he hath
ordained Sacrainentes,which wc feelc by experience to be more than
profitable helpes to nourifhc and confirme Faith. For becaufe beingc
cnclofed in the prifon of our fl c{h>we do not yet attaine to the degrc
of Angels, God applying himfelfe to our cappacity according to his
ifij wonderful
ToSaliiation. Lib.4. 420
wonderful Prouidcncc, hath appointed a mcane whereby.we being
farrc diftancfrom him might come vntohim. Wherefore the order
of teaching rcquircth that now we entreate of the Church, & of the
gouerncmcnt,orders,& power of ir,& then of the Sacramtntcs.and
bftly alfo of ciuilc ordcr:and therwithall that we call away the godly
readers from rhofe corruptions wherewith Satan in the Papacy
hath dcpraued all things that God hath appointed for our faluation.
I will beginne at the Church, into whofc bofome God will haue hi«
children to be gathered together , not only that they (hould by her
hcjpe and minillery be nourifhcd while they are infantes and yongc
children, but alfo be ruled by her motherly care till they grow to ri-
per age.and at length come to the marke of Faith. For it is not law-
full that thofe things be feuered which God hath conioined,that to
whom he is a Father, the Church be alfo their mothenand that not (vjat.i e
only vnder the law, but alfo fince the coming of Chrift, as Paul wit- ^
ncffeth.which tcacheth that we arc the children of the new & hea- oala. J
ucnly Hicrufalcm. *^»
1 In the Crcede.whcre wc profeffe tliat we belcuc the Church,
that is not fpokcn onely of the vifible Church whereof we nowe en*-
trcatc,bnt of all the elcd of God> in whofc nuber they are alfo cS"
prehended that are departed by death. And therforc this word Be-
leue is tiiere fer, bscaufe oftemimes there can no other difference be
noted betwene the children of God & the vngodly,bctwcnc his pe-
culiar flocke and fauage bcaftes. For whereas many do cnterlace this
worde in,that is without probable reafon. I graunt in dcede that it is
the more commonly vfed,& alfo wateth not the confentingteftimo-
ny of antiquity,forafmuch as euen the Nicen Crcde,as it is reported
intheEcckfiarticalhiftory,addeththeprepofitionin.Butthercwfth-
all we may marke by the wrytings of the aunci^t Fathers,that it was
in olde time receiued without controueifie to fay, that they beleucd
the Church & not in the Church.For Auguftine,& that ancient wri*
ter whatfoeucr he was, whofe work rcmaincth vndcr y name of Cy»
prian concerning the expofition of the Crede, do not only fo fpeakc
thefclueSjbut alfo do exprefly note that it (liould be an vnproper ma-
ner of fpeakinge if the prepofition were adioyncd,& they confirmc
their opmion with no triflmg reafon.For we therforc teftifie that wc
belcue in God becaufe vpo him as a true fpcaker our mind rcpofeth
it felfc, & in him our conhdcnce rcftcth which could not fo coucni-
cntly be fpokcn to fay in the Church,no more than it could be fayd,
I belcuc in the forgiuenes offinnes, orinthcrcfurredigoftheflel'h.
Therefore aithougU I woulde not ftriuc about wordes, yet I haddc
Cap.i . Of the outward mcanes
rather follow the propriety of fpcakinge that rtiouldc be fittcfl to ex-
prclfe the m itter,than curioufly to fccke for formes of fpcech where-
by the matter may without caufe be dirkened . But the cnde is,ihac
we rtioulde knowe th.u although the Deuill attempt all meanes to o-
uerihiowc the grace of Ch rift, and though the enernies of God be
caried with violent rage to the fame entent : yet it can not be extin-
gujihcd , nor the bloudc of Chrift be made barren , but that it will
bring foorth fome frute. And fo is both the fecret cledionof God,
and his inwarde callingc to be conlidcred : bscaufe he alone kno-
wcth who be his , and holdeih them enclofcd vnder a fcale as Paulc
tcarmeth it ; faying that they beare his tokens whereby they may be
^*'** feucrally knowcn from the reprobare. But becaufe a fmali and con-
temptible number lieth hid vnder a huge multitude, & a few graincs
of whcatc are coucrcd with a heape of chaffe, to God onely is to be
. left the knowledge of his Church, the fundation whereof is his fe-
cret cledio. But If IS Jiot fufficient to concciue m thought and mindc
the multitude of the elect, vnleflc we thinkc vppon fuch an vnicy of
the Church into which we be truly perfwaded that we our feiues be
engrafted. ForvnlffTewe be vnder our hcide Chrift vnitedtogc-!
ihcr with all the reft of his members - there abideth for vs no hope
of the inheritance to come. It is therefore called Catholike or Vni-
iierfill , becaufe we can not finde two or three Churches bur that
Chnft muft be torne in fonder, which can not be done. But all the e-
led of God are fo knit together in Chrift » that as they hang vppon
one head>fo they may grcwc together as it were into one body,clca-
umg together with fuch a comparing of ioynics as the members of
one fehe body : being truely made one, which with one hope,F3!ch,
Charity jWith one ftlfc Spiritc of God do hue together, beingc cal-
. led not only into one inheritance of eternal hfe,but alfo into one par-
takinge of one God and Chrift. Wherefore although the forowefull
defolationthatonech fide prefenteth it ftlfe in fight, criethouithac
there is nothinge left of the Church , yet Ictre vs know that CrTiftcs
death is frutefuUand that God maruelloufly as it were in fecretc
corners preferueth his Church. As it was C^yd to Elins, I haue kept
to my felfe feuen thoufand meji that haue not bowed their knee be«
fore Baal.
5 Albeit this article of the Crcede doth in fome refped belongc
to the outwarde Church, that euery one of vs (liould holde himfelfc
in brotherly confent with ail the children of God , fhoulde yccldc
vnto the Church that authoritie which it deferueth, finally ftiould fo
bchauc himfclfe as a /hepe of the docke. And chwrfore is adioynedthe
commit
to Saluation. Lib.4.. 421
communion of Saintes.Which pnrccll,althoueh commonly the oldc
wncers dolcaue k out, yet is not to be neglcftcd : bccaiifcir very
well exprclTcth the qualitieof theChurche: as if it had bene fayed
that the Saints are gathered together into the fcllowrnippe ofChrift
with this condition, that whaiioeiier benciites God bcrtowcth vpon
them th^y lho«Id concuiually communicate them one to an other.
Whereby yet the diucriinc of graces is not taken away, as we knowc
that the gifces of thcholy Ghoft are diueifly diihiouted: neithcris
the order of ciuile gouernementdifturbed, by whicii it is Jaw full for
cuery man priuately to enioy his owne poflcflions.as it is necclfary,
that for preferuation of peace among men, they fhould hau? among •
them felues pccuhare anddeuidcd properties of things. But there is
a community affirmcdjfuch as Luke defcribeth,that of the multitude A^.4.
of the belcuers there was one harte and one foulczand Paule, when ^.'*
hecxhorteththe Ephciians ro be one body, one Spirit, as they be J' '*^"*
called in one hope. For it is nor portibie , if they be rrucly pcrfwaded
tliat God is the common father, and Chrift the common head to
them all, but that being coniotned among thcmfcJucs with brot! erif
tour , they Ihoiild continually communicate thofc things that thfy
liaue. Nowe it much behoueth vs to knovve what profice thereupon
rcturneth vnto vs. For we bcleue he Churche to this ende , that we
may be certainly perfwaded that we are the merr.bers of it. For by
this meanc, our faluation relteth vpon fure and foundc ftayes, that it>
although the whole frame of the world be iliai^en , can not come fo
ruine and fall downe. Firrt it ftandeth with goddcs elcdion , netrher
can it vary or fade but together with Iflseternall Proiiidcnce. Then,
it IS after a certaine mancr ioined with the ftcdfadnclfe of Chnft,
which will no more fuftcr his faithfull to be plucked from him , than
his owne members to be rente and torne in peccs . Beiide that , we
arc allured that rrueth iliall alway abide with vs , fo lon» as we are
holdenin the bofomeof the Church Laftof altha: we feic that thefc
promifcs belong to vs, there /lialbefaluation in Syon, God Ihall for loeT.t.
cuer abide in Hierufalem , that it may not at any time be moued. So ? '•
much canthcpartakingofthc Church do, that it holdeth vsin the ^]!"^ '^
fellowippe of God. Alfo in the very worde Communion is much ^ ^ **•
comfort : becaufe while it remaincth certaine , that whatfoeuer the
Lorde gcucth to his and our members, belongeth to vs, our hope is
by all their good things confirmed. But in fuch forte to embrace the
vnitie of the Church , it is not needefull (as we haue already fayed)
to fee the Church it felfc with our eyes > or felc it with our handes:
but rather by this that it confiiicch ia Faith^ wc are admonifhed thoc
Cap.xJ Of the outward mcanes
we ought no IcfTc to thinkc it to be , when it paflcch our vndeift5n«sL
ding , than if it openly appeared. Neither is our faith therefore the
worfe , becaufe it conceiaeth it vnknowcn : for afmuch as we are not
here in comaunded to difcerne the reprobate from the cled (which
is the office of God onel7,and not ourcs)but to determine aUuredly
in our mindcs, that all they that by the merciful! kindneffc of God
the father through the effeduall working of the Holy Ghoft, arc
come into the partaking of Chrift,are feuered into the pecuharright
and proper poffeffion of Chrift : and that,for afmuch as we be in the
number of thore,we are partakers of fo great a grace.
4 But fith it is now our purpofe to entreat of the vifible Church,
let vs Icarne cuen by this one title of Mother,how much y knowledge
thereof is profitable, yea ncceffary for vs : for afmuch as there is no
other entry into lifejVnlcffefhcconceiuc vsinhcrwombc ,vnlcflc
fhc bring vs forth , vnlcffe ihc {cede vs with her breaftcs, finally vn-
lefle (he kepe rs vnder her cuftody and goucrnaunce,vntilI fuch time
M.it.21. as being vnclothed of mortal! flefli we lliall be like vnto AngcIs.For
'°- our weakeneflc fuftVeth vs not to be difmifled from fcholejtill we hauc
^' ^7- bene fcholars throuf;hout the whole courfe of our life. Befidc that
loel.'. outof hcrbofomc there isnoforgeuenelfe of (innes , and no falua-
»s. tion to be hoped for,a5 witncfleth Efaie & loci, with whom agreeth
Exe. 1 3. Ez.cchiel when he declareth that they (hall not be in the number of
^ Goddcs people whom he puttcth away from the heauenly hfe. As
on the contrary fide , they arc fayd to write their names among the
circiens of Hierufale,that turnc them felues to the following of true
PfajoS godhneffe. After which marter it is alfo fayed in another Pfalme:
4» Remember me , Lorde, in the good will of thy people : vifite me in
thy faluation that I may fee the benefites of thy elcd , th.;t I may be
merry in the mirth of thy pcople,th3t I may reioife with thy enheri-
taunce.In which wordes the fatherly fauor of God, and the peculiar
teftimonicottheSpiritualllife isreftrained tohisflockcjCothatihc
departing from the Church is alway damnable.
5 But let vs precede to profecute that which properly belongeth
Ephe.4. to this place.Paul writeth that Chrift, that he might fulfill all things,
* ' • gaue fome Apoftles , fome Prophetes, fome Euangeliftes , and fome
Paftors & teachers,to the reftorins; of the holy ones, into the worke
' of minift eric, vnto the edification of the body of Chrift : vntill we ali
come into the vnitie of Fayeth , and of the acknowledging of the
fonne of God , vnto a perfed manne , and to the meafure of the full
growen age of Chrift. Wc fee howe God , which was able to make
them that be his perfect in a momenjc, yet will no: haue them grow
To Saluation. Lib4. 422
into manly age but by the bringing vp of the Church. We fee the
mcane cxprcHedjfor that vnto the Paftorsis enioincd the preaching
ofthchcauenly dodrine. We fee howe all, not one excepted, are
brought into one rule,that they fhould with milde Spirit and willintj
tolearnc,yelde tJicmlHues to the teachers appointed for that vfe.
And by this markc Efayc had longc before fet out the kingdomc of Ffa 59.
Chrilt.where he faycih : My Spirit which is in ihce ,nnd the wordcs =»•
that I haueput m thy mouth fhallneuerdcparte, neither out oFthy
mouth,nor out of y mouth of thy fedc & thy childres childre. Wher-
vpon followeth that they are worthy to pcriOi with famine & pming
hunger ,whofoeucr they be that refufe the Spifituall meate of the
(bule reached vnto thctn of God by the handcs of the Church. God
doth breath faith into vs , but by the inftrument of his Gof'peJl , as
Paule faycth that faith is by hearmg. A% alfo with God rcmamerh ^om.to
his power to faue,but (as the fame Panic witnclTcth) he vtrcreth and * ^*
difplayeth-thc fame in the preaching of the Gofpell.For this reafon
in olde time he wiled that there ihould be made holy afTemblies to
the fanduary,thatdodrine ntercd by the mouth of-the Pricft fhould Pfa i ji
nourilh the confente of faith. And to no other ende thofe plorious '^'
titles haue rcfped , where the temple is called the rclt of God , and ,
the fanduary his houfe, vvherc he is .Oiyed to fit betwene the Cheru-
bins,but to bring eftimationjloue, reuerence and dignitie to the mi-
nifteric of the hcauenly dodrme, which orherwifc the fight of a
mortall and defpifed man would not a litle diminifli. Therefore that
weftiould knowe, that out of earthen vcflelsis brought fourth vnto J.ror.
vs ineftimable treafure, God himfclf cometh fourth, & in as much as 4-7 •
he is author of this degree, fo he will haue himfclf to be acknowled-
ged prefentc in his irjftitution.Therforc after that he hath forbidden Lcui.ip
his to giue themfcluesto iudgemcnt by flying of birdcs, to fouth j*«
fayings,magicall aries,necromancy and other fuperftitions,he immc-
diatly addcfh that he will geue them that which ought to fuffice in
ftcade of all, that is to fay, that they fhall neucr be deftitute of Pro-
phetes.But like as he fent not the olde people to Angels , hut raifed
vp teachers out of the carth,which might truely performe the office
of Angels : fo at this day alfo his will is to teach vs by men. And as in
the olde time he was not contente with the onely lawe , but added
Pricfts for expofitors , at whofe hppes the people (hould enquire for
the true meaningc thereof; fo at this day he not onely wiUeth vs
to be hedefully bent to reading,but alfo appointcth maifters ouer vs,
by whofe trauail we may be holpcn : whereof cometh double profit.
For on the one parte by a very good triali it proucth our obedience,
Gap.i . Of the outwarde meanes
where wchcare his miniftersfpeakingeuen as it were himfelfc. On
the other fide it alfo prouideth for our wcaknelTe , while after the
mancr of men he had rather fpeake vnto vs by interpreters to allure
vsvnto him, than with thondring driue vs away from him. And
rruelyhor^e expedient thisfamdiar maner of tcachmg is for vs, all
the godly do fele by the feare wherewith the maieftie of God doth
virorthily aftonifhthem. Bur they that thinkc that the authoritieof
thcdodrineis abaced by the contempt of chr men that are called
to teach, do bewray their vnthunkcfulncffeibecaufe among fo many
excellent giftes wherewith God hath garnifhed mankinde : this is i
fin;>ular prerogatiue, that he vouchcfaueth to confccrat the mouths
and tongcs of men to himfelfc, that his owne voice flio uld found in
them. Wherefore on our behalues let vs not be greued obediently
to embrace the dodrinc of faluation fet foorth by his commaunde-r
tncntand by his owne mouth : becsufc although the power of God
is not boundc to outwarde meanes , yet he hath bounde vs to ao or-»
dinarymmerof teaching .which whylc phrcntikcmcnnc refufe to
kepe,they wrappcthcmfrlues m many deadly fnares. Either pride,
or difdauiefulneifc^orenuie moiieth many to perfwade themfeluej
that they can fufficicntly profit by their owne priuate reading and
ftudy , and fo to defpife publike afiTcmblics , and to accompte prea-
ching fuperfluous.Btit fith they do as much as in the is lofe or breake
in fonder the holy bondc of vnitie > no man efcapeth the due pu-
nifhmentof this diuorce, bathe bcwiccheth himfelfe with peftilenc
errouTS and moft wicked dotages. Wficreforc, that the pure (impli-
citie o( faith may florifh among vs , let vs not be grieusd to vfe this
excrcifc of godlinefle, which God by his inftitution hath {liewed to
be necefTarie for vs and fo carneftly comendcth. But there was neuer
yet foud any eucn of the moft wanton dogges which would fay that
we ought to ftoppe our cares againft God t but in all ages the Pro-
phets and godly teachers haue had a hard ftnfe againft the wicked,
whoes fti(bbornefle can neuer come vnder this yoke, to be taught by
the mouth and minifterie of mennc. Which is as much as to blottc
out the face of God which lliineth vnto vs in dodrine. For , in oldc
time the faithfull were commaunded to fekc the face of God in the
Sanduarie, and the fame is fo ofte rcpeted in the iawe, for no other
caufc but for that the dodrinc of the Iawe and the exhortations of
the Prophets were tothem ahucly image of God: as Paule affir-
mcththat in his preaching fhineth the glorieof Godin thcfaceof
Chrift. Howe much the more detcftable are the A poftates, which
gredcly fecke to deuide Churches, as though they did driue Ihcpa
from
to Saluation. Lib.4. 42^
from their foldes and calt chem into the niourhc^ of wolues. Bcjc wc
murt holdc that which we hauc alleged out of Pauljthnc (he Church
isnoothcrwirebildcd bucby outwarde pieaching.nnd that the holy
ones are holden together with no other bonde but when with lear-
ning and prorting with one confentc they kepe the order appointed
by God to the Church.To this cnde pnncipally,fls I hauc fayed, the
faithfull inoidc time vnder the lawcwere commaundtd torcforte
to the fanduary.Brcaufc whcnMofes fpeikcth of the dwelling; plnce Exo.io»
of Godjhe doth there withall call It the place of n>me , where God -4.
hath fet the memoric of hisname. Whereby he plainely teachcrh
that without the do6i''ineofgodlintfic there IS no vfc thereof And
it IS not doutcfull but that for the Ihme reafon D.iuid with great bit.
tcrncfle of Spirit cornplaineth that he is by the tyrannous cnr^lcicof
his- cnetnies kept from entring into the Tabernicle. It femtth com-
monly to many,a childifh lametation,becaufe it fhould be but a very
fmall JoiTe,and alfo no great pleafurc ihould be forgone thereby, to
w.uite the entric of the temple, fo that there were enough of other
dclitefuli things. But he bewajleth that with this one gricfe,an2uiib,
and forowe , he is fretted & vexed & in a msncr waflcd. For nothing
is of greater cftimation with the faithfull, than this helpe whereby
God by degrees lifteth vp his on hie. For this is alfo to be noted, that
God in the mirror of his dodrine alway fo (hewed himfelfe tothc
holy Fatbers, that the knowledge was fpirituall. Wherefore the tem-
ple IS called not oncly his face,but alfo (to take away all fuperftition)
his foote ifole. And this is that happy meting into vnitie of faith,
Vvhile from the hieft cuen to the loweft all do afpire to the head. All ppa.! 3%
the temples that cuer the Gentiles vpon any other purpofe buildcd 7.
to God , were but a mere prophaning of his worfhip : whcreunto ^f^^-99'
though not with like groflenes,yct fomwhat the lewes fell. Whereof ^'p'
Stephwi out of the mouth of Efay rcprocheth the,whcre he faycih, ,*g 2.
that God dwelleth not in temples made with handes.&c. B'ecaiifc ^St.^,
onely God doth by his worde fan^tifie to himfelfe temples to the 43.
iawefull vfe. Andifwc rafhly attempt any thing without his com-
maundement, by and by to an euill beginning do dcauc ncwc deui-
f€S by which y euill is fprcade abrode without mcafurc. Yet Xerxes,
when by the coijfell of the Magitias he burned vp or plucked downc
alltheteplesof Greece,vndifcrete]y fayedjtharthcgoddes to whom
all things ought to be freely open were inclofed within wals & tile«.
As though it were not in the po. cr of God,to the entente he mt^^hc
be ncrc vs,after xeeitaine m.incr ' o dcfcende vnto vs,& yet neither
to chaunge place , nor tofaftcn ys to earthly mcancs : but rather by
Cap. I. Of the outwarde meanes.
certaine chariotes to carry vs vpto hisheauenly gloiy , which wktl
the inmeafurable grcatneifc cherof Bleth all things, yea & in heigch
furmounreth the heaucns.
6 Nowe forafmuch as at this time there hath bene great ftrifc
about the cffediialnelTe of the minifteryjwbile Tome cxcefliucly am-
plifie the dignitic thereof: and feme other affirme that that which
improperly belongmg to the Holy Ghoft is wrongfully geucnaway
CO mortallman,if we thinke that rainiftcrs and teachers do pcnrcc to
the mindes & harteSjto amende as well the bhndncfie of the mindes
as the hardnefle of hartes : it is mete that we geue a right determi-
nation of this cotrouerfy. All that they contende on both partes (hal
cafily be accorded by exprefly noting the places where God the au-
thor ofprcaching ioining his Spirit with it promifeih fruit thcrcofrc^
againe, when fettering himfelf from outwardc helpcs he chalengeth
•to himfclfe alone as well the beginnings of f^ith as the whole courfc
Mala.4. thercof.lt was the office of the fecode Elias (as Malachie witneffeth)
Ioh.i K *^ enlighten the mindes , and to turne the bancs of fathers to the
X 6. children, and vnbeleucrs to the wifedome of the righteous. Chrift
I. Pet. I. pronounceth that he fendeth the Apoftles , that they fbould bring
*^. fruitc of their labor. But what that fruite is Peter fhortly deHneth,
"■^ ?^' -Tayingthat we be regenerate with incorruptible fcede. And there-
I. Cor p fore Paule gloricth that he by the Gofpcll begate the Corinthians^
». and that they were the fealeof his Apoftlciliippe: yeathathc was
z.Cor. notahterallminifterjfuchasdidonely bcate ihc eares with founds
^C r pf v^Jcc , but that there was geuen him an eft'cdualnellc of Spirit,
^'.4. ' thathisdodfineniouldnotbevnprofitable. In which meaning alfo
Gal ?.i in an other place he fayeth ,that his Gofpell was not in word oncly,
i.Cor. but jn power. He affirmeth alfo that the Galathians by hearinge re-
^ ^' ceiucd the Spirit of faith. Finally in many places he maketh himfclfe
not oncly a worker together with God , but alfo affigncth Uimfelfc
the office of geuing faluation. Truely he neuer brought fourth all
thefc things to this entent to geue vnto himfclfe any thing were ifc
neuer foUttle feuerally from God : as in an other place he fhortly dc-
claicih , faying : our labourc was not vnprofitablcin the Lordc , ac-
y^ r cording to his power mightily working in me. Againe in another
^',, * placc,he that was mightic in Peter towarde thecircumcifion, was
Gala. 2. alfo mightie in me towarde the Gentiles. But howe he leaueth no-
^' thing feuerally to the roiniftcrs,appearcth by other places,as:hc that
I.Cor. piajjt^thjs nothing, and he that watcreth is nothing, but God that
geucth the encrcafe. Again:! haue laboured more than all : not T,but
the grace of Go(i that was with me. And truely we muft holde fait
thofc
To Saliiation. Lib.4. 424
tTiofc fayings, where Godafcnbing tohirtifclfe che cnlighrcningof
the minde , and che renewing of the harte , teacheth that it i j a rob-
bcrie of God if man take vpon himfelf any parte of either of them.
In the mcane time if any man offer himfelfc to the minifters whom
God ordcineth, willing to learnc>hc fhall knowe by the fruce, that
this maner of teaching not in vaine plcafcd God, and that this yoke
of modefty was not in vaine layed vpon the faithful!.
7 But as for the Church vilible and which is within the compafle
of our knowledge , what iudgcment is mete to be geucn thereof, I
ihinkeit already appeareeuidcntly by that which we hauc before
fayed. For we hauc fayed , that the holy Scripture fpcaketh of the
Church after two fortes. Somtime when it nameth the Church, it
mcancth that Church which is in dcede before Godjimo which none
are receiued but they that are both by grace of adoptio t he children
of God, and by fanftification of the Spirit the true members of
Chrift. And then truely it comprchcndeih not oncly the holy ones
that dwell in earth , but alfo all the elcd that haue bene fince the be-
ginning of the world. But oftentimes vnder the name of the ChurcU
it figniHcth the vniucrfall multitude of men fcatcered abrode in the
world, which profeffe that they worfhip one God and Chrift, by
Baptifmc cntre into his faith,by partaking of the Supper teftific their
vnirie in true do^rine and charitie , haue an agreement in the word
of the Lorde, and for the preaching thereof do kepc the minifteric
ordeined by Chrift. In this Church there be mingled many hypo-
crites which haue nothing of Chrift but the name and outwardc
ftiewe : there be many ambicious,couetous, enuious, cuill fpeakers,
fome of vnclcane life: which be fuffred for a time, either becaufc
they can not by lawfull order of iudgemec be conuinced, or becaufc
thereisnotalway in vre that feucritie of difcipHnc that ought to be.
Therc/orc as we muft ncedes beleue that the Church which is inui-
fible to vSjis to be feen with the eyes of God oncly : fo arc we com-
maunded to regarde this Church which is called a Church in refpcd
of men, and to kepc the communion of it.
7 Therefore fo much as behoucd vs td knowe it,the Lord haili j.TJm,
fct It out by certaincmarkcs and as it Vi'ere (ignes vnto vs. This is 21^.
in dcede the fingular prerogaiiue of God himfelfe , to knowe who
be his , as we hauc already alleagcd out of Paule . And ti ucly that
the ralTieneffcof menne ftiould not crepe fo farre,it is prouided, by
the very fucceiTeofthingcs daily putting vs in mindc,howc farre
his fccret iudgementcs do I'urmounte our vnderftanding. Foreuen
they that fccmcd moft defpcratc , and accomptcd vttcily paft hopc»
Gap.r,^ Of the outwardemcp.ncs
are by his goodneffe called backc into the way ; & they ihnt fecmc^
to ftande fcifl in comparifon of other,doa oftentimes fall. Therefcjrc
Tomch according to the fecret prcdcftination of Gcd (as Aui^uftjnc faycdi)
n loa. there be many fhcpe with6ut,3nd many woiucs wuhin . For he
^^ • knowcth chem, and hath them marked that knowc neither him nor'
themfelucs But of thofe that openly beare bis badE;e,nis oneiy eyes
. do fee who be both holy wirliout foming,and who wlH corinue eiicri
to the ende, which is the very chiefe point of falnatjon. Yeronthe
other fide , forafmuch as he forfawc it to be fomedcale cvpcdJenr^
that we (hould knowe who were to be accomptcd his children , he
hath in this parte apphed himfelfe to our capacitie. And becaufe the
certaintie of faith was not ncceffarie > he hath^puc in place thereof a
ccrtaine iudgementofchiritie'.vvhercby we lliould acknowledge for
mcmbres of the Church thofe that both withconfcftionof f.'.ith,3n4
With example of Jife, and with partaking of facraments,do prcfcilc
the fame God and Chri(l with vs. But as for the' knowledge of the
body thereof, howe much more that he kncwe it to be neceflary for
our (aluation.withfo much v more ccrtaine mnrkcs hchathfet itoi^t.
9 Loe hereupon groweth & arifethvnto vs, a face of the Church
vilible to our eyes For wherefoeuerwe (ee the word of God to bcf
purely preached and hearde.. and the facraments to be miniftrcd ac-
cording to the inftirutio of Chrift,there it is in no w/fe to be douted
that there is fome Church of God : forafmuch as his promife canne
»tn,i 8. not decciuc, Whcrfocuer two or three are gathered together in my
^' namejtherc I aminihemiddes of them . But that wc may euidcnrljr
vnd .rftande the fumme of this matter, we muft proccde by the fe as ic
were degrcesrrhat is to fayjthat the vniuerfall Church is a multitude
gathered together out of all narios whatfoeuer they be, which being
iondcred and feucrally fcattercd bydiftanccs of places, yet dorh
5-gree in one truth of godly dodiine,and is boundc together with the
bonde of one fclfe religion: And that fo vnderthis arc coprehended
all particular Churches which are in allfownes and ftrcetes accor-
ding to rhc 0!-der of mens neceflltie,fo that euery one of them may
nghifuUy htue the name and alstboritie of a Church : And that all
particular men which by profcffio ofgodlinefle arcrcckcncd among
I'uch Churches, although they be in dede ftragers from the Church,
yet do after a ccrtaine maner belong vnto it,till by poblikc iudgemet
they be banifhed out of it. Howbeit there is fomwhata diuers manet
in induing of priuate men and of Churchcs.For it may fall in expe-
rience, that fuch men as we (liall thinke not to be altogether worthy
of the company of the godly, yet we muft vfe like feicthren, and ac-
compc
To SaiLiation. Lia4. 425
comptthcm amongc cljcbithiull , for the common confcnt oii he
Church, whcrby they arc (uftcicd :\nd borne W'ith.>llin the body of
Chiift . We do not by ouic teltimonie allowe fuch to be rricrrbcrs
of the Church: but we Icaue .hem rlic place that tlie\ hauc rn.on .x
the people of God, till it be by ordcily ri.'ht ot lawc ta':e away h cm
them. But of the very multitude wemuH othcrwiie thinkc : which
if It hath and honorcih the miniHciy of the Woid^and ilicadnuni-
llracionofSacramcntes , udefeiueih without douc to be efvttn.td
& iudi]^cd a Church : bccaufc it is ccrcaine that thole rhings arc not
without fruiie . So we do alio picjcruc to the vniucrf all Chinch her
vnitie , which diuchllie fpirits biue alway trauailed to cue m fundcr;
neither do wc dch aude of their authoritie iholc bwfull aficmblics
w hich are dilpofcd according to the fitnclle of places.
10 Wc hnuc fet for iif n s to difccrne the Church by , the prea-
ching of the VVoid> and the obfcruing of the Sacramcnis F or tiitTc
can be no where but they n^utl bring forth fruitc •, and be piofpcred
with the blcflingof God 1 do not fay, that whcreloeuci th'.' word is
preachcdjthcre by and by fprinecthvp fruit: but I lay that no where
it IS receiucd and hath ailayed featc , but that it brin :cth foith the
cffcdualnciVc thereof. Where the preaching of the Gofpcll is rcue-
rcntly heard, and the Sacraments are notnegl-dcd ,howtfoeucr it
be,there for that time appearcth a not deceitful! & not uoutfull face
ot the Church, whereof no man may vnpunillicd either del pile the
authoritic,or refufe the admonitionsjor refilf the cciuells, or mockc
at the corredions ; much Icilc to depart from it , arid to brcikc in
lunder the vnitie of it. For the Lorde fo hiely citecmcth the Com-
munion oi his Church , that he comptcth him for a tratcrous lunnc
away and forfaker of Rehgion.whofocuer fhal (tubborncly tiiraunge
himfelfc from any Chriihan fcllowcfliip , fo that it be inch a .one a$
hath the true miniftcric of the Word and Sacraments. He fo com-
mcndeth the Churches authority, that when it is violate, he lud^cth
his owne diminifhcd . Neither is it of fmall importnuncc , thai the
Church is called the piller and ftrong ftay of truth and the houfe of « T;™
God.By which vvorde$»P.'3ulc fignifieth, that to the endc the truth of '5-
God fhould not decay in the world , the Church is a faithful kcper
thereof : becaufc Gods will wastohauethe preachingof his word
kept pure,and to fhcwc himfelfe vnto vs a father ot houlholdc by her
miniftcrie and labour , while ilie fccdcth vs with fpirituall nounflie-
ments, and procuieth all things that make for our laluation. It is alfo ^P^'' ^
noiclcndcr praile,that it is faidthatfhc is chofen and fcucrcdby Epi,e.i
Chrilt to be his fpoufe} chat ihouid be without wrinkle and Ipot^the a^.
HHH
Cap.i , *0f the outwarde mcancs
hoAy and fulnes of him. Whereupon followeth, that departing from
the Church is a denying of God and of Chrift. Therefore fo much
the more we muit beware of fo wicked difagreement . For while we
go abouc/o much asm vs licth, to procure the ruinc of Gods truth^i
we are worthy that hefhould fende downc his lighteninii with the
whole violent force of his wrath to deftroy vs. Neither can there be
imagined any fauUe more hainou^,than with wickedbrcache of faith
lo dchle the maiiagc that the oncly begotten fonnc of God hath
vouchefaued to contraftc witli v&i
1 1 Wherefoye let vs diligently kepc chcfc markes cmprintcd
in our raindes,and]et vs efteeme them according to theLordcs will'.
For there is no thing that Satan moic endeuoureth than to take away
and abo'illi the one of thefejOrboth :fomctimctbat whenihefc
markes are raced and blotted out.he may ta';e away the true andf
natural] diftin(ftion of the Church : fomctimc that when they arc
brought m contempt, he may with open falling away pfucke vs from
the Church.By his craft it is brought about,that in certain ages pafti
the pure preachin-gof the word hath vanished away : and now c he
doth with as great importunacy trauaile to ouerthrowe tliemini*
fterie, which yet Chi ill hath fo (hbl;llied in rlie Church, that when
it is taken away, the edification of the Church perifheth. But nowc^
howe d-iuiigerous, yea howe deadly a tentaiion i« it when it doth but
conu' in our mir.de- [o depart from thit cpngregarion , wherein arc
fccne the fignes and tokens by which the ^orde thought his Church
fufficiently defcribed?VVe fe howe great he6e is to be taken on both
fides. For, that wcfhoclde not be dccciued voder the tide of the
€hurch,cucry co^regation that prctedcth the name of the Church
muft be examined by that maner of triall,as bya touchftone.lf ithaue
in the word and Sacraments the order appomted by the Lord,it will-
not decciue vs : let vs boldly yeld vnro it the honor due to Churches*
But contrary wife if it boalt it felfe without the word and Sacramets,
we muft no lefle with fearefull confcicncd beware of fuch deceites^.
riian on the other fide we muft flee rofhf neffe aad pride.
iz Where as we fay that the pure minifterie of the word and the
pure vfagc in celebrating the Sacraments , is a fufficient pledge and
earneft , fo that we may fafely embrace as the Church any fellowc-
ihippe wherein both thefeliialbe: this extendeth Co farre,tbai it is
neuer to be caft of, fo longe as it fhall continue in thofe , although it
fwarme fullof many other faultes. Yea and there may fome faulti-
nefTecreepe into it, in the adminiftrationeiihcr of Dodrine^or of
the Sacramentes , which ought not to eilraunge vs from the CGm«
munion
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 42^
fnanion of it.Forall the articles of true Dodrme be not of one lortc.
Some be fo necelfanc to be knowcn , that they ought to be ccrtainc
tnd vndoutcd to all men , as the propre principles of Religion : of
which fort arc , That there is one God. That Chrift is God, and the
fonne of God: that oui Saluation conliftcth m the mercy of God:
andfuch like. There be other that beino in conrroucific bctwcnc
Churchcs,yct do not breake the vnicie of faith. For thole Churciics '
that difai^rec about this one point, if without lull of cbntcntion,
>\ithout ftubburncflc of affirming , the one thinke that foules when
they depjrtc from the bodies do flie vp into henuen , and the other
Church dare determine notb.ing of the pl3ce,but yet certainel) hoi •
deth that they hue to the Lorde.Thc wordcs of the Apoltle arc:Lct Phil. 5.
all vs that be perfed thinke all one thing : but if ye ihinke any thing '^*
otherwife, this the Lorde fliall allorcuele vnto you. Doth he not
fufficiently l"hewc thai diuerliiie of opinions about thefe matters,
that be not To neceflary , ought to be no grounde of difagrcemenc
among Chriftians? It is in dtcde a principall pomte,tbat we agree
in all things. But for as much as there is no man that is not wrnppcd
with fome littell clowde of i^norauncc: either wc muHeleaue no
Church at all.or we muft pardon a bcinge deceiucd in fuch things as
may be vnknowen without violating the fummt; of Religion , and
without lolTe of faluation. But I meanc not here to defend any errors
be they ncuer fo litlc, fo as I would thinke that they (hould be chcri-
(hcd with flattering and winking at them:but 1 fay that we ought not
rallily for cucry light diflcntion forfake the Church,in which at leaft
that Dodrine is reteincd fafc and vncorrDpt.ed , wherin ftandeth the
fdfetieof godlincfle ,and rTie vfe of Sacramentcs is kept as it wasin-
ilitutc by the Lonrde. In the meane time if we endeuor to amend
that which difpleafeth vs,we do thcrin according to our dutie. And
hereunto belongeih that faying of Paoie : If any thing better be i.Cot.
rcuclcdtohim that (itieth , let the firft holdc his peace. Whereby *4JO*
it is cuidente , that all the membrcs of the Church are cuery one
charged with endcuour to publike edification, according to the mea-
furc of his grace, fo that it be done comely and according to or-
der: that is , that we neither do forfake the communion of the
Church,nor abiding ia it,do trouble the peace and well ordred difci-
pliae thereof^
I J Butinbcaringc with the rmpcrfedion of life,our gentle tcn-
demcflc ought to go much fnrther.For herein is a very flippenccaC-
nclfc to fall : and herein with no fmall deuifes doth Satan lay wait
for vs. For there haae bene alway fome , which filled with falfe pcr<.
HHH ij
Cap.i . Of the outwarde mcancs
fwalion of pcrfcft holinclVe as though they were already made ccf*
tjinc ayry fpirits , defpifcd the company of all men , in whomc they
fawc remaining any thing of the nature of man. Such in old time
were the Cachary, and they that were as madde as they , the Dona-
tiiics. Such at this day arc fome of the Anabaptiftes , which would
fceme to haue prontcd abouc the reft . Some there be that offende
more by an vndifcrete zele of nghtf oufnefle , than by that maddc
pride. For vfhen they fee among them to whom the Gofpell is prea-
chcdjthc fruit of life not agreably anfwering to the doftrinc therof»
they by and by iudge that there is no Church. It is in deede a moft
iuft difplcafure,and fuch a one whereunto in this moit miferablc
age of the world, we geuc to much occa(ion. Neither may we excufc
our accurfcd llouthfulnelfe , which the Lordc will not fuffer vnpuni-
fhedrns euen already he begmncth with grcuoas fcourges to chaftifc
it. Wo therefore to ys, which with fo diflblute licentioufnefl'e of
wicked dooinges , make that wcake confciences be wounded by rea-
fon of vs. But in this againc they ofFendc whom 1 haue fpokcn ofjbc-
caufc they can not meafure their beeing difpleafed. For where the
Lorde requireth clemencie, they leaning it, do geuc themfelues
wholly to immeafurable rigoroufncfle. For,becaufe they ihinkc that
there is no Church where there is not founde purencfle and vpright-
nelfe of hfe , for hatred of linnes they departc from the lawcfull
Church.while they thinkc that they fwarue from a company of wic-
ked men. They alledge that the Church of Chrift is holy. But that
they may alfo vnderftande that it is mingled of good and euillmen,
let them hearc this parable out of the mouth of Chxift, wherin it is
fit.i 3. compared to a nctte^in which fiflies of alfkindes are gathered toge-
J' ther;& are not cho(en out til they be laid abrode vpon y Ihoarc. Let
j^ ^' them heare that it is ike vnto a corne Hclde,which being fowen with
latc.j, good graine, is by the enemies fraudc fcattered with tares, of
>• which itisnotclcanfedvntillthecroppebe brought into the barnc
floore.Finally let them heare that it is like vnto a floore, wherein the
wheat is fo gathered together , that it lieth hidden vnder the chaftc,
till being clcnfcd with fanne and fyue it be at length laid vpinthc
grainer. If the Lorde pronounce that the Church iliall euen to the
day of ludgement be troubled with thtseuill , to be burdened with
mingling of euill men: they do in vaine fecke for a Church fprinklcd
with nofpotte.
14 But they eric out that it is an intollerable thing,that the pefti-
lence of vices fo raungcth abroade. What if the fayingof the A-
poille do here alfo anfwerc them^Amongthe Corinthians not onely
a fewe
To Saluation. Lib.4. 427
a fcwe had gone out of the way, but the infcdion haddc in a mnncr
poflcffcd the whole body : There was not ontly one kinde ot" linnc,
but many : neither were they light oftences , but certainc horrible
outragious doings : it was not only corruption of mancrs , but alio of
dodrinc. What in this cafe faith the holy Apolile, that is to fay, the
inftrument of the Holy Gholt , by whoes teftimonic the Cb.urclic
ilandeth and falleth? Doth he require a diuifion from them? Doth he
banifh them out of the kin^dome of Chrift ? Doth he ftrike them
with the extrcmeft thunderbolt of curfe ? He not onely doth none
of all thefe thinges : but he both acknowledgeth and reporteth it a
Church of Chrift and fellowfliip of faindcs. If there remaioe a
Church among the Corinthians , where contentions , fecflcs , and ''^°^''
cnuious partakinges do broile : where quarels and brawlinges be in ^ g, *
w — f.^ ^^-^ .-> J . .- ^ J.Ccj.i
vre.with a gredmefle of hauing where that wicked dooing is openly ^, g. ^
allowed, which were abhomin:>ble among the very Gentilcs.-wherp & . 5> i
Paules name is vniuftly railed at , whom they ought
red as then father : where fomc fcorne at the rcfurredion of the ^'
dcadjwith ruine whereof the v^hole Gofpell falhth : where the gra-
cious gifrs of God ferue to ambition, & not to charitie:wherc many
things are vncomely and vnorderly doone : and if therciore there
ftiliremaincaChurch,bccaufe theminiftericofthe word and of the
Satraments is there not rcfufed, who dare take away thenamcof
the Church from them that can not be charged with the tenth pare
of thefe fautes? They that with fo great precifenefle dcale (o cruelly
againft the Churches of this prefent time : what (I pray you) would
ihev haue done to the Galathias , which were almoll vtter forfakers ^^l-^ '
of the Gofpell amog whom yet the fame Apoftle founde Churches:
I f They obieft alfo , howc that Paulc greijoufely rebuketh the
Corinthians for fuflering in their company a man that was a hainous
finner ..^nd then he feiteth a generall fentence wherin he pronoun-
ceth, that it is vnlawefull euen to eate brcade with amanncofre-
prochcfullhfc.Hcre they crie out: If it be not lawefuU toeatecom- i.Cor.
mon breade, howe may it be lawefull to eate with them the bread of S*'.
the Lorde. I confefle in deede that it is a great dilhonour, if hogges
and dogges haue place among the children of God : it is alfo a much
niore dilhonourif the holy body of Chrift be geuen forth to them.
And truclyif they be well ordred Churches ,tiiey will not fufFcr
wicked men in their bofomc, and will not without choife admitt^c
both worthy and vnworthy together to that holy banket.Buc foraf-
much as the Paftors do not alwav fo diligently vvatchc,yea and lome-
time arc more tender m bearing wuh men than t!iev ought to be, Qt
• - HHH lij
Cap.i . Of the outw^arde meancs
are hindered Co that they can not vfe that fgucriiic that they wouM:
it cornmerli top^iie thaceuen rhey that are openly euill , are noi;
alway thrurt out of che company of the holy ones.ThisIgraunteto
be a faulrc: neither will I diminillie it, iith l^aule doth fo iharpely
rebuke It m the O^nnthians. But although the Church be flacke in
her duetic ,it (hall not be therefore immediately in the power of
cnerv pri'« 'te man , to take vppon him felfc the ludgement to (eiiet,
him. 1 do «n dcdc notdeny that it \s the doing of a godly ma to with*
drawe himlelfe from all piiuate company of eoill men, to entangle
himfeife in no willmgfamiiuritic with them. But it is one thing to
flee the compaiue ofeuill men,and an other ihmg for hatred of them
to forfake the Communion of the Church. But where as they thinkc
it fact ilege to be partakers of the Lordes Bread with them , they arc
therinmuc!» more rigorous than Paule is. For where he exhorteth
vs to a holy and pure partaking", he requireth not that one Ihould
examine an other,or cuery man y whole Church,buty they (houldc
echone proue h-mlelfe-lf it were vnlawfuil to communicate with an
vnworthy m.in,then truely Paul wo|^ld bid vs co looke circumfpe<S-
ly whether there were any in the muliitude,by whocs vndeannefl'c
vvemightbedefii'jd. Nowe when he requireth onely ofeutryman
the proofe of ihcmfelues , he iheweth that it nothing hiirteth vs if
any vnworthy do rhruft thcmfelues in among vs. And nothing el's is
mcnt by this which he fayeth afterwardcjHe that eateth vnworthily,
eateth and drinketh iudgementto himfeife. He doth not Uy,to othcrj
but to himfelf And rightfully.For it ought not to ftande in the choifc
of eucry particular man,who be to be recciucd,& who to be reicdcd.
The knowledge '.hereof bclongeth to the whole Churche , which
knowledge can not be had without lawcfuU order,as hereafter {hall
be faid more at large. Therefore it fhouldbe vnrightuous, that any
priuateman (hpuld bedef.led with the vnworthincife of an other,
whom he neither can nor ought to kepe backe from comming to it.
i6 But although by this vndifcrete zeale of rightcoufnelfe this
tentation doth fometime alfo entre into good men ; yet this we fliall
finde that to much precifeneflc groweth rather of pride , difdainfuU
nefle,and falfe opinion of holyneire,than of true hplincfTc and true
zeale thereof Therefore they that are bolder than other, and as it
were ftnndcrd bearers to make any departing from the Chprcb , for.
the moft parte do it vpon no other caufe , but in defpifing of all men
to boatt themfelues to be better than other . Therefore Aiif uftinc
fayeth well and wifely:When godly order & maner of Ecclefiaftical!
dticipline ought principally to haue rcgarde vnio the ynitie of Spirit
in
c. s
To Saluation. Lib.4. 428
inthc bondc of peace : which the Apoftle comniaundcd to be kept
by bearing one wiih .in other : and which bcinge not kept , the me-
dicine oi reuenge is proucd to be not only fuperfluous, but alio per-
nicious,and therefore nowe to be no medicine at alhthofe euill chil-
<lrcn,which not for hatred of other mens miqijiiits,biit lor affc(ftion
of their owne contentions , do gredily labour cither wholy to drawc
oratlealt lodmide the wcakccommon people ent.mglcd with the
•bofting of their name, fwell.ng with pride>madde with llubburneflc,
traiterous with fdaundcrs, troublelome with feditions ,leaft they
iliould fcemexo want the hght of truth , do pretende a Ihadowc of
rigorous feueritic : and thofc things that are in the holy Script jres
<6 naundcd to be done with a gentler kinde of healing/auingthe fin^
ceritic of iouejand kcping the vnitic of peace, to corrcd the faultcs
of brethren, they abufe it to facrilcgcof fchifme , andtooccafioiiof
<rutting of But to godly and quiet men he geueth this counfeli >that Bhifd,
ihcy mercifully correct that which they can, and that which they can *'b
not , paciently beare , and gronc and mournc with Joue , vnttll God
citiier amende and corred them,or at the harueft rootc vp the tares,
and fannc out the chaffe.Lct the godly trauaile to fortifie thcmfelucs
with thcfe arnuires, Icall while they fecmc to thcmfclues ftrong and
couragious reuengcrs of righteoufnes , they departe from the king*
dame of he3ucn,which is the oneiy kingdomc of righteoufncffe.Foc
(ith it is Gods will to hauc the communion of his Church to be kept
in this outward ft lowfhip:he that for hatred of cuil men doth break
the token ofthat feloilwp , entreth into a way whereby is a flippeiy
falling troro the communio of faints. Let thcmthinkcthatina grcac
multitude there be many truely hftly and innocent before the eyes of
the Lord, whom rhey fse not.Let them think that euen of them that
be difcafcd there be rtftny that do not plcafe or flatter thcmfclues in
ihcir faulres, but bcmg nowe and then awakened with carneft fearc
of God do afpire to a greater vprightnefle. Let them thinkc that
iudgement ought not to be geucn of a man by one deede:forafmuch
as the liolicft do fomtime fall away with a moft greuous fall.Lctthcm
thinke that to gather a Church there licth more weight both in the
miniderieof thcwordand in the partakingc of the lioly myitcrics,
than that all v force fhould vani{hc away by the fault of fome wicked
men. Laft of all le't them confidcr , that in iudging the Church , the
iudgement of God is of greater value than the iudgement cf man,
17 Where nlfo they preted that the Cliurch is not without caufff
pallid Holv, it is mere to wey with what holincflV it excelleth:Icart if
^rp w^ii admiitc no Chu>:ch bat fuch A oftC a* is in all pointcs pcrfe^,
Cap.i, Ofthe outwardemcancs
>he 5. vve leauc no Church at all : It is true in deedc which Paulc faithjthat
Chnlt gaue hinifelfc for the Church to fanftifie it : that he denied
-it with the liuer of water with the word of hfc , to make her vnto
iiimfclfe a glorious fpoufe haufng no fpotte or wrinkle &c.Yet this is
alfo nothing Idle true,that the Lorde daily worketh in fmothing her
wrinkles and wiping away her (pot:cs. Whereupon foUowcth that
herholinelie is nor yec Fully finiihed. Therefore the Church is To
holy, that it daily profireth and is not yet perfeft.daycly procedeth,
& if) not yet cotr.c to the inarkeof holincITcias alfo in an other place
'tl«?« fhalbemore largely declared, wiiercns therefore the Prophets pio-
phecic that there (haibe a holy Hicrufalem^rhrouoh which itraungcrs
* ^ ihali not palfe : and ;i holy temple vvhereinto vndeane men ihall not
entre : let vs not To t.ike it,a$ if there were no fpotte in the membrcs
of the Church:but /or that with their whole ciideuour they afpire to
holincffeand found pureneiTcjby the goodnclTc of God clcnnncfTc is
afcnbed to them , which they hauc not yet fully obtemcd. And al-
though ofccnnmes there be but rare tokens of luch fandification a-
mon^je mcn:yet we muft dcteririncV there hath bene no time fincc
the creation of rhc world whenn the Lord hath not had his Church,
and that there Hiall alfo be no time to the very cnde ofthe world,
whenn he Ihall not h>iue it. For albeit immediatly firo the beginning
the whole kinde of menis corrupt and defiled by (he finneof Adam;
yet out of this, asit were a polluted maiTe, Godalway fandifieth
fom e veifeis vnro honour,that there fliould be no age without feling
Oi' his mcrcie.Which he hath tcftiiied by cert^inc promiles : as thefe:
I'Sp. I haueordeineda teflament to my tled:I haue fworne toDauidmy
feruant , I will for cuer continue thy fccdc : I will buildc thy featc iii
genvLUionand generation. Ai^aipc, the Lorde hath chofenSyon, he
er 51. hath chofen it for a dwellingtohimfelfe:Thi?ismy reft for cuer.&c.
A^ijine, Thefe things faith the Lord which sjeueth the Sunne for the
hght of y d;iy , the mone & ftarres for tl ic light ofthe might.If rhefc
lawes ihall faile before mc,then the fcede of Ifraell ("hall alfo failc.
18 Hereof Chrift himfelfe, the Apoflles , and in maner all the
Prophets hauc geuen vs example. Horrible are thofe defcriptions
whenn Efaic , Hieremic, loel, Abacuc, and the other do lament rhc
fickncfl-'S of the Church of Hierufalcm. In the common p;ople,in
the m.igilfratjjn the Pricfts all things were focorriiptjthat Efiie dou-
teth not to mntch Hierufalcm with Sodom and Gomorrha.Religion
was pai tely dcfpifed, partely defiled: in their maners are commonly
reported theftcs,cxtortions,brc3chts of faith ,murtbcrs and like mif-
chicucs. Yet therefore the Prophets did neither ercd to thcmfclue^
ncwc
.To Saluation. Lib.4. 429
ocwc Churches,nor build vp ncwc altars on which they might hauc
fcu<.iaUlaciitices:buc of whatfoeucrmanermcn they wcre,yccbc-
caufe they conlidcrcd, that God had left his word with them, and
ordained Ceremonies whcrby he was there woiiiiippcd,m the mid-
deil of the aflcmbly of the wicked they hcldc vp pure handcs vnto
him. Truely if they had thought that they did gather any infcdion
thereby , they wouldc rather hauc died a hundred times than hauc
fufficd thcmlclues to be drawen thereunto. Therfore nothing with-
held them fro departing, but defire to the keping of vnity.But if the
Prophets thought it againft confcicnce,io eftrange ihemleiues fi om
the Churchjfor many & great wicked doings,not of one or two men,
but in mancr of the whole people : then we take too much vpon vs,
if we dare byandby depart fro the communio vf the Church, where
not all mens maners do fatisHe either our iudgemet,yca or the Chrt-
ftian profcirion.
19 Now what ttjancr worldc was there in the time of Chrift and
the ApolHcs f" And yet that dcfperate vngodhnefH. of thePiianfees,
and the diflolute liccntioufncfle flf liuinge, whtch then eche where
xeigned,could not hinder, but that they vied ;he fame Ceremonies •
with the people, and ailemblcd with the reft into one temple to the
publike excrcifes of religion. Whtreof came that, but becaufe they
knew that the felowlhip of euil men did not defile ihcm, which with
a pure confcience did communicate at ihc fame Ceremonies . If any
man be litlc moued with tlic Piophccsand Apoftles,lct him yer obey
the authority ofChrift.Thereforc Cyprian well fay th,though there Libr.a
be fcene tares or vnclcane vcflcls in the Church, yet there is no caufc cpift.5
why we ihould depart from the Church:we muft only labour that wc
may be wheate: wc muft vfe diligence andendcuouras much as wc
may y we may be a golden or (iluer veftel. But to breakc the earthen
vclicls, is the only wprkc of t!ie Lord , to whom alfo is giucn an iron
rodde . And let no man chalengc to himfcifc that which is properly
belonging to the Sonne onely , to be able alone to fanne the floore,
and clenfe ihechaft'e , andfcuere allthc tares by mans iudgement.
This is a proude obftmacy,and a prefumption ful of facrilege,which
a peruerfe furour taketh to it felfe. &c . Therefore let both thcfc
thingcs remaine ccrtainely fixed. Firft that he hath no excuic.that of
his owne will forlbkcth the outwarde communion of the Church.
Whtrcthe wordof God is preached and the facramenrcs miniftrcd:
then chat the faulies of a fewe or of many are no hindrance, but that
wc may therein rightly profeffc our faith by the Ceremonies inftitutc
jby God;becaiife a godly confcience is not hurt by the vnwonhinc*
Cap.i. Ofthcontwardmcancs
of any othcf dthcr paftor or priuaic man , and the mifterics are to a
holy & vpright man neuertbclefle pure & hoirome bccaofe they arc
together handled of vnclcanc men.
JO Their prccifcnefie and difdainfulncs proccedcth yet furthcn
becaufc rhcy acknowledge no Church but fuch a one as is pure from
all fpottes be they neger fo fmall ; yea they arc angry wich good tea-
chci Sjfor that in exhortinge che faiihfull to go forward, they teache
them all their life long to gronc vndcr the burden of vices,& to flee
vnto pardo.For they prate y by this meane men be led fro perfcdjo,
I grauntin dccde, that in earnelt callinge vpon pcrfedion we ought
not fiowely or coldly to irauaill, much leflc to be idle ; but to fill our
fnmdcs with confidence thereof while we be yet in our courle>I f;;y,
it is a deueliflic inuencion. Therefore in the Crcedc the forgiueneflc
of finnes is aptly ioyned next after the Church. For none do attaint
it,but only they that are citizens and of the hoafnold of the Churchy
^f^ . 3S it is read in the Prophet. Therefore the buildingc of the heauenly
24. Hierufalem ought to go before,vvherein afterward this mercifulnefie
of God may haue place, that whoToeuer come vnto it, their iniquity
may be taken away. I fay that it ought firft to be buildcd,not for rhat
there can be any Church without the forgiucnes of finnes , but be-
caufe the Lord hath not promilcd his mercy but in the Commump
of Saintcs.Therforc the firft entry for vs into the Church and king-
dome of God, is the forgiueneflc of finnes, without which we hauc
Of c. 1. no couenam or conioyning with God.For thus he fayth by the Pro**
phet : In that day I will ftrike you a coucnant with the bcaft of the
fieldc.with the fowle of the aire, and with the vermine of the earth.
I will brcake the fworde and warrc from out of the earth , and I wiH
make men to flcepe without fcarc. I will efpoufe you vnto me for e-
uer,T will efpoufe you(I fay)in rightcoufnefTc, in iudgemcnt, in mer-
cy,and in compaflions.We fee how by his mercy the Lord reconci-
leth vs to himfelfc. And fo in an other place, when he fore fayth that
the people fhalbc gathered together againe, whom he had fcattcred
lere. j 3. abroadc m his wrath , he fayth , I will clenfe them from all wickcd-
*• nefle wherewith they haue finned againft me . Wherefore by the
fi^nc of wafhinge we enter into the felofhippe of the Church, vvhtr-
by we miy be taught,that there is no entry open for vs into y houfc-
holdc of God, vnleffc oiir filthmes be firft wiped away with his good-
nelTe.
2 1 But by the forgiueneflc of finnes the Lord doth not onely re-
ceiue & adopt vs once into the Church, but by the fame he alfo pre-
feruethand mainpinech vs ftiU in it. Forte whatpurpofe were it, to
ha^e
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 430
hauefbclia pardon grunted vsjasfliouldferuc torno vrc?But tue-
ryone ot the gpdly is a wjtneffc to himfclfe that the mercy of God
ihould be vaine and mockinij, if it ihould be graunccd only but oncer
bccaufc tlieic IS none v is not in hisowncconfcieccpnuic through'
out his whole life oFmany wcakneircs, which m dc y mercy of God.
And iruirlv not in vainc God promifcth this grace pecuharly to the
of his owne h.^ufholde : and not in vaine He commaundcrh the fame
mtlfagc ot rcconcihation to be daily offrcd vnio them. Therefore as
thT-ouszhoutsil ourlifc wecary about vsthe.remn.inicsoffinnc , vn*
Itfle we be fuliaincd with the continuall grace of the Lorde in forgi-
uingour llnnes ..wefhall karccly abideone momeniin th.eChufch.
B'lr the Lord hath called his vnto eternail faluation. Therefore they
ouohtto thmkcthat there is pardon alway ready for their fiiines.
Whcrforewcoughttohoideaflbredly, that by the liberality otGcxJ
by meanc of Chriftes dcferuinfj through the SandiHcatio of the Spi-
rit,(?nncs, haue bi^ nnd aredaily paruoncd to vs which be called and
graffcd.into the bodv of the Church.
zz To dcale this benefit vnto vs,the keies were giue to the Churdi
For when Chrill gaue cSc Apofties commaiindcment, anddcliucrcd Mat.f4
the power to forgiue (innes,he meant not tins oncly,th3t they fhould ''-^ '■
loofe the from linnestliat were fr6 vngodlines couerted to the f^ith j^j, j^
of Chnrt: but rather tha: they lliould continually execute this office i ?.
among the faithful!. Which thing P.111I teafhetb,whe hcwritethihat « Cor.j
the.emb;ifrnoe of reconciliation wns left with the miniftcrs of the*"*
Church, w4itrcby they rhoulde often fimcs in Chriftesnamc.exhortc
the Jjcoplcxo reconcile chemlcluc? to God. Therefore in the .Com-
munion ofSamteSjby the miniftery of the Church it fclfe,(innc$ arc
continually forgiuen vs , when the Pritftcs or Bilhops , to whom that
office i> comrnitt:!d, do with the promifesof the Gofpell confirmc
godly confciences in hope of pardon and forgiuencsiand that as well'
publikelyaspriuarely.accordmge as neci-diryrcquireth. For there be
very many.which for their weakenes do neede a finiiular atonement.
And Paul reportcth thatnofonlv in common preaching, but alfo in Aft j«,
houfcs he h :d tedifted the f .lith in Chrift , and feucraily admunifhed ^°*
curry one of the dodrine of faJuation.Therefore v/chaue hercthre
things to be ".oted.Firft,that with how great holmes I'oeucf the chil-
dren of God do exccli,yet they be alway in this clbte, fo long as they
dwell in a morrallbody , that without for^iueneffi- of finnes they can
not ftandc before God.Secondly,that this benefit is fo.proper to the
Churchy that we canne next otherwife cniov it , but if we abide in the
Communion therco£,Thirdiy»ihac it is diilcibuted voto vs by the mi<
Cap.i , Of the outward mcancs
niters and Paflors, cither by prcachingc of the Gofpell , or by mini^
firing of the Sacraments:& that in this bchalfc principally appeareth
the power of the kcics , which the Lord hath giucn to the fclowfhip
pf the faithful.Whcrfoic let cucry one of vs think this to be his duc-
ty,no where clfc to fecke forgiucnes of finnes, than where the Lord
hath for it. Of publikc reconciliation which belongcth to difciplinc
we (hall fpcakc in place fit for it.
i J But forafmuch as thofc phrentike Spirites that I hauc fpoken
ofjdo go about to plucke away from the Church this only anchorc
of faluation , confcicnces are the more ftrongly to be confirmed a*
gamft a Co pcftilent opinion.Thc Nouatias in old time troubled the
Church with this dodrine:but not much vnlikc to the Nouatias our
age alfo hath many of the Anabaptiftcs which fall to the fame dota-
ges - For they faine that the people b( God are in Baptifme regenc*'
fate into a pure and Angclike life,that is corrupted with no filthincf
of the flefh.But if any man offend after Baptifme,they Icauc vnto him
nothing but y vnappeafable iudgemct of God. Briefly they graunt no
hope of pardon to a finner falle after grace receiued : becaufe they
acknowledge no other forgiucnes of finnes but that whereby wc be
firft rcgcncrate.But although there be no lie more clcarcly confuted
by the Scripture; yet becaufe thcfe men findefome whom they may
4ecciuc(as alfo in old time Nouatus had many folowers)let vs lliort-
ly (hew how mad they be to their owne and others deltrudion. Firft,
whereas by the commaundement of the Lod,ihe holy ones do daily
rcpeatc this praier-.forgiue vs our dettesrtruely they do confefTe them
fclucs detters . Neither do thcy^craue it in vainc becaufe the Lordc
hath al way appointed no other thingc to be asked , than that which
be himfclfc would giue. Yea whereas he hath teftified that the whole
praicr (haibe heard of his father, yet he hath alfo fealed this abfola-
tion with a peculiar promife.What wil wc more?The Lord rcquireth
of the holy ones all their \i(e long a confeflion of finnes,yea and that
continual!, & promifeth pardon. What boldncs is ir,either to exempt
them from finnc » or if they haue ftuml^ed , vtrerly to exclude them
from grace ? Now whom doth he will vs to forgiue feuenty times fe-
uen times ? not to our brethren ? To what end did he commaund it,
but that wc fhoulde folow his clemency. He forgiueth thereforc,noC
once or twife : but as often as being ftrikcn dov/nc with the acknow-«
ledging of finnes they figh vnto him.
14 But tha^(we may be^in in a maner at the very fwadling cloutcf
of the Church)ihe Pacriarchcs were circumcifed,being allured into
partakingc of the coucnant hauinge vtidoutcdly by their fathers dili -»
gencc
ToSaluation, Lib.4. 43 1
l^cncc liin taught righteoufnelTc anclinnoccncc,whcn they conlpt-
rcd to murthcr their brother : this was a mifchieuous act , to be ab- Gen, 3
horred eucnofthemoft defperate thecucs. At the laft being meckc- '^*
ned with the monitions of ludas, they folde him;this was alfo an in- ^
tolerablehaynoufneffc. Simeon and Leui,with wicked rcucngCjand ,jj^ '
fuch as was ahb condemned by their owne fathers iudgemcnt , vfed Gen. 3
cruelty againft the Sichemites . Ruben with moft vnclcane Kift dch* ^ 5 .
led his fathers bed.Iudas when he would giuehimfeh'c to fornication ^'"-3
againft the law of nature, went into his fonnes wife, And yet I'o farre q^*^
arc ihcy from being wiped out of the choicn peoplc,that ihcy be ra- i c.
thcrraifed vp to be hcades of it. But what did Dauid ? when he was 3.sa.i
a gouernour ofiuftice, with how great wicUcdneflc did he by (heding 4. &«
of innocent bloude open the way to his blinde luft ? He was already
rcgeneiatc,and among the regenerate garnifhed with notable praifcs
of the Lordmcuerthelelfe he committed that haynous ofFence,which
is horrible euen amoge the Gentiles : and yet he obtained pardon.
And ( that we may not tary vpon fingle examples ) how many pro-
mifes there are in the law and the Prophetes of Gods mercy towardc
the Ifrachtes , fo oft u is proued that the Lord fheweth himfclfc ap-
peafcable to the offenfes of his people.For what doth Mofes promife Dcu. 3
to come to paffe , when the people beingc fallen into Apoftafie (hall ^'
returnc vnto the Lord ? Helhallbringetheebacke outof captiuity,
and (hall haue mercy on thee,& Ihall gather thee together out of tht
peoples to whom thou haft bin difperfed . If thou be fcattered euen
to the borders of the hcaucn , I will from thenfe agaync gather thee
together.
2^ But I will not beginnc arecital that fhouldc ncuer be ended.
For the Prophetes are full of fuch promifes , which do yet offer mer-
cy to the people couered with infinite wicked doinges.What offenfc
is there more hainous tha rebellion? for it is called a diuorce bctwenc
God and the Church. But this is ouercome by the goodnefle of God. .
What man is there ( fayth he by Icremy ) that if his wife giue foorth Icr.i.
her body in common to adulterers, can abide to rcturne into fauour ^ ^ ••
with her ? but with thy fornications all the wayes are polluted,0 lu-
da,the earth hath bin filled with thy filthy loues.But returne vnto me,
and I will receiue thee. Returne thou turne away , I will not lurne a-
way my face from thecibecaufe I am holy,and am not angry for euer
And trucly he can be no othcrwife minded,which aflfirmeth y he wil- Ftc.iI
Icth not the death of a finner^bui rather that he {hould be conuertcd * J* 3(
& line. Therforc when Salomon did dedicate the temple, he appoin • \ *^
ccd ic alfo CO this vfc>thai the praiers made for obcainingc pardon of 3 ,|$,
aS,
Cap.i . Of the outward mcaftcs
finncs lliouldc be heard from thenfe . If ( fayd he ) thy fonncs llial
finne (far there is no man that finneth not) ,ind ihou bcinge angry
ftiaL dcliucr them to their enemies,& they Ihalrcpenr in their hart^
aftdbcinge turned (hall cntreace thee in their capiiuity,fayinge, wc
haae finned , wc hauc done wickedly , and fhall pray towaid-e the
bnde which thou haft giuen Co their Fathers , and cowarde this ho-
ly temple:chou ilialt heare therr praiers m hcauen,an;d ihalt be made
mercifull to thy people that hath finned againft thee,and to all their
wickcdncfles wherewith they haire oftcndcd thee . And not vainely
«hc Lorde ordained in the iawedaily Sacrifices for finhes . FoTFfthe
Lorclhad not forcfeene that his people (hould be troubled with con-
tinuaU dffeafes of finnes, he wouldc ncucr hauc appointed thcfc rc^
n>cdiesfortherrJ.
x6 Was this bcnefite taken away from the faithful!, by the com-^
ming of Chrjft, wherein rhe fulnes of grace was flrewed forth/athau
chcy dar e not now pray for pardon of finncs.^ that if they oftcnde the
'^^' J"^ Lord they may not obtains any mercy ?^ What (hall this be elfe, but
f im.1 *<* ^y that Chrift came to the de(h udion of them that be liis, & not
co-thcir (aluat jon , if that mcrcifulnclfe of God in pardoninge finncs
lacio. which in the oldteftamentwas continually ready for the holy ones^
^^^ ^ be now fayd to be vtterly taken away?Bur if wcbeleiic the Scriptures
I ' which expicfly cric out,that inChrift only the grace & kindcnci of
at »5 the Lord fully appeared>that the plcntifulntlfcof n^ercy waspoured
»• outjthat the rcconcihation of God an^meir was fulfilled : let vs noe
^ * • dour that there flowcth vnto vs a more bountiful! mcrcifulnes of the
5^[g, hcaucniy fathcr,thanthatitis cutof or fhortned. And hereof there
'.. want not cxamplcs.PeterwlwcH had heard that he fhould be denied
»-•» -^ before the Angels of Godthat cofeffcd not the name of Chnft be-
Sir
*•' ^ tore mcn,d€nied him thnfe in one night, and that not without exe-
(-„r^ cranonryet he was not put away from pardon.They thatliued inor-
.ai. dinatly amonge the Thcfialonians are fo chaftifed, that yet they be
gently called to repentance. EuenSymonthe Magician himielfcil
not caft in dcfperation, but he is rather commaundedto hope wellj
wiicn Peter counfelleih him to flee to praiers. •
27 Yea moft haynous finnes haue fomctfme pofleflcd wholfe
Churches, oueof which Paule rather gently vnwrapped ihem, thaa
pronounced them accurfed.The falhng away of the Galathians was
no mcanc offenfe.The Corinthians were fo much lefl'e excufable iha
chey,as they abounded m mo 8c thofe nothing hghtcr finnes:yet nei-
ther of the are excluded from the mercy of God. Yea euen they that
had finned aboue the reft in vncleancs* fornicacion & vnchaftiiyiarc
namely
ToSaluation* Lib.4. 432
toamcly called to repentance. For the coucnantof the Lordc rcmai-
ncth & (hall rcmaine for cucr inuiolablcj which he folcmncly made
with Chnft the true Salomon 5c his mcmbcrs^in chefe wordcs>U his
^nnes (hall forfakc my law, & fliall not walkc jn my iudgcmentcs,tf Pfa.Jjj,
they flial defile my right eoufneflcs,& not kcpc my comaundcments, 3*«
I will Yifite their miquities with a rod,& their finncs with ftripesiBut
my mercy I will not take away from him . Finally by (he very order
of the Creede we be taught , that there rcmaintth in the Church of
Chrift contimiall pardon of iinnes:for that when the Church is as ic
Were ftabiilhed.yet forgiucncflc oHinnes is adioyned.
z8 Some that be fomewhai wifer, when they fee the dodrinc of
Nouatus to be confuted with fo great plainnefle of Scripture , make
not cucry (inne vnpai donabU,but wilful tranfgreiling of the la vv,m-
to which a man wittingly & willingly failcth. Now they that fay fo,
do vouchfaue to graunt pardo to no finne, but where a man hath er-
red by ignorance. But whereas the Lord in the law comaundeth one ^c*"*4»
forte of Sacrifices to be offrcd for clenfing of the wilful finnes of the
faithfulljand other to redcme their ignorances : how great Ic wdnes
(hall It be to grauni no clenfing to wilful finncf*! fay thai there is no-
thing plainer, than that the onely Sacrifice of Chi ili auailcth to for-
giue the wilful finnes of the holy ones.forafmuch as the Lor de hath
teftjfied the fame by carnall Sacrifices as by figncs . Againe who^an
cxcufe Dauid by ignorance, whomc it is euident to haue bin fo well
intruded in the \m/ ? Did Dauid not know, how great was the faulf
of adultry & manflaughter, which daily punifhed the fame in other?
Did brotherflaughter feme to y Patriarches a lawful thing J" Had the
Corinthians fo ill profited that they thought that wantonncHejVn-
cleanne{re,whoidom, liatreds & contentions pleafed God^ Did Pe-
ter beingc fo diligently admonilhed not know howc great a matter ic
was to forfwearc his malftcr?Thercfore let vs not with our owne en*
uioufneflc ftop vp the way againft the mercy of God ihatfo gently
?tterethitfelfe.
ly Trucly I am not ignorant that the oldc wry ters expounded
thofe finnes that are daily forgiuen to the faithfull , to be the li^ht
off-nfes that crepe in by weakcncffc of the flcth:& that they thought
that the folemne repentance which was then required forhaynous
mifdeedes mi-^^ht no more be iterate than Baptifme. Which fayinge
is not fo to be taken,as though they would either throw them dowa •
headlongc into defperation tiiat after their fiift rt- pentance had fal-
len againe,or extenuate thofe other finnes as though they were fmal
in the fight of God. For they knew that ilie holy ones do oftentimCvS
Cap. I. Of the outward mcancs
ftaggerby infidelity that fupcrfluou othes do lomctimcs fall from
thcm,thac they nowe and then arc chafed vnro anger, yea that chey
breakc out cuen into manifcft raylingcs, & bdide thcfe be troubled
with other euils wbich the Lord not Iclendcrly abhorrcth:but they
fo called thcn-!,to put a differs ncc bccwcne them and publikc crimes
y wiih great ofilnfc came to the knowledge of the Church. But wher-.
as they did fo hardly pardon them that had comitted anything wor-
thy of Hcdciiafticall corredion , they did not thisthereforc,becauic
they thought that luch lliould hardly hnue pardon v/ith the Lord:bui:
by this feueiity they meant to make other afraid that they ihould not
rallily runne into wicked doings,by the deferuing whcfof they might
be ei^rangcd from the Communion of the Church : how( beit truely
the word of the Lord which herein ought to be the only rule vnto v$,
appointeth a greater moderation. For it tcacheth that the rtgor of di-^
fcipline IS fo farre to be extended , that he that ought cluefely to be
prouidcd for be not fwallowcd vp with heauines: as we haue before
declared more at large.
The ij. Chapter.
w/l compart fan ofthefaife {"hunb with the trtfe Church,
OF howe great value the miniftery of the worde and Sacra-
mcntesoughttobe with vs, and how farre the rcucrence of
itought to proccede , that it be vntovsj perpetuall token
whereby to difcerne the Church,it hath bin already deda-
red.That is to ray,whetlbeuer that miniflcry abide th whole and vn-
corruptcd,thtre the faultes or dtfeafes of maners arc no impedimenr,-
butthatitmay bearc thcna'^^'^ofaChurch.Thcn, that the very mi-
niftery it fclfe IS by fmall er rs not fo corrupted,but that it may be
cftemed lawhil.Morouer we haue (liewcd that the errours that ought
fo to be pardoned,are thofc wher by the principal dodrine of rcligio
is not hurt, whcrby thofe chiefe pointes of religion that cu^ht to be
agreeably holdcn among the faithful arc not dcftroied,and in the Sa-
cramentC5,thofc that do not abolifli nor cmpaire the lawefull inftitu-
tion of him that ordained them. But fo foone as lying is broken into
the chiefe tower of religion , fo foone as the fumme of neceflfary do-
dnoe is peruerted , and the vfc of the Sacramentes falleth : truely the
dtftrudion ofthe Church followeth/ like as a mans life is at an end,
when his throte li rhruft through or his hart deadly wounded . And
iphc.2. this isclearcly proued by the wordes ofPaulc^whcn he teacheth that
^« the fundaiion of the Church is lay d'Vppon the dodrinc of the Apo-
ToSaluitiofi. Lib.3. " 433
fHcs and Prophets, Chnlt himfelfc bcingc the head corner ftonc If
the fundation of the Church be the dodrinc of the Prophets & A-
poftlcsjhy which the faithful are commaunded 10 rcpofc their ialua-
lion in oncly Chnlhthcn take away that dodime,and how {hall the
building ftande any longer? Therefore the Church muft ncedes fall
downe,wlierc that fumme of rcligio fallcth which is only able to vp*
holde it. Againcjif the true Church be the piller & ftay of the tructh, .
it is certaincihat there is no Church, where lying & falilioodc hauc ^ I
vfurped the dominion.
X Sith It is m futh cafe vndcr the Papiftry , we may vnderftandc
how much of the Church is there remainingc. Inftcde of the mini-
ftery of the word, there rcigneth a pcrucrfe gouerrtement and made
of lies mingled together, wr.ich partly quenchcth and partly chokcth
the pure light . Into the place of the Lordcs Supper is cxitrcd a moft
filthy facrilcgeahe forme of worfliippingc God is deformed with a
manifold and intolerable heape of fuperltitions : the doftrinc,with>
out which Chriftianity can not ftande, is altogether buried and dri-
ucn out : the publike aflcmblics arc the fchoolcs ofidolatry and vn-
godlinefle. Therefore there is no perill leaft in departing from a darm-
nable partaking of fo many mifchicucs,we be plucked fro the Church
of Chrift . The communion of the Church was not ordained to this
cndjthat it fhould be a bond whereby wc fhould be entangled with i-
dolacry,vngodlinc{re,ignorance of God,and other kindcs of euils:but
rather whereby we (hould be faft hold en in the fearc of God & obe-
dience of truth. They do in dedc glorioufly fct out their Church vn-
to vsjthat there ftiould fceme to be no other Church in the worlde:
and afterward,a$ though the vidory were gotten, they decree that al
be Schifmatikes that dare wirhdrawe themliclucs from the obedience
of that Church that they paint outcand that all be hcretikcs that dare
once mutter againft the dodrinc thereof.But by what proues do they
confirme that they hauc the true Church ? They aljifagc out of the
juncient Chronicles , what in olde time was in Italy , in Fraunce , in
Spainc.rhey fay that they fetch their beginning fromthofe holy me
that with found dodrine founded & raifed vp Churches,& ftabhfhcd
the fame dodrine & edifying of y Church with their bloud. And that
fo the Church hath bin at: oiig the fo confecrate both with fpiiitual
giftes, & with the bloud of inattyrs,& preferucd with continual] fuc-
ceflionofBifhopSjV it might not fall away-Theyrehearfe how much
Ireneus,Tcrtullian, Origen,Aug'.»ftinc,&other eftemed this fuccef«
lion. But how trifling thcfc things be,& howthcv be but very mocke*
liesjl wil make them very ca/iiy to vndcrftandc that wd bic content a
: in
Cap.2 . Of the outward mcancs
litlc to wcy them with mc , Trucly 1 wouldc alfacxhort thcmfeluci
carneftly to take hcde hercnnto,if I did truft that I might any thing
preuailc with them by tcachinge. But forafmuch as they,lcauinge au
regard of trueih, do bend themfcJues to this only purpofe^by all the
waycs that they canjto defend their owne caufe, I will only fpcakc a
"few thingcs whereby good men and thofe that lone the truethamay
winde themfcluesout of their futile cauillatios. Firft I aske of them,
why they do not alleage Aphnke, andRgypt, andall Afia? Euen
becaufe in all thofe countrcycs this holy Succcffion of Bifhops hath
ceaflfed , by meane whereof they boaft that they haue preferued
Churches.They come therefore to this point to fay,that they there-
fore haue a true Cliurch , becaufe lince it firft bcganne to be , it hath
not bin delticutc of Bilhops : for in perpetuall courfe they haue fuc-
ccded one an other.But what if I caft Greece in their way?Therfore
I aske againe of them , why they fay that the Church is loft amonge
the Grecians, among whom that fucccffion of Biftiops was ncucr in-
tfTTupted, which in their opinion is the only keeper and prefcrucr of
the Church.They make y Grecians Scbifmatikcs,but by what right?
becaufe in departmg fro the Apoftohke i^ca, they haue loft their pri-
uilege;what? Do not they much more deferue to Jcofc it that depart
from Chrift himfelfe ? It foloweth therfore, that the pretence of fuc-
ceftion is but vaine,vnlefle the poftcnty do kepc faft and abide in the
truth of ChnftjWhich they haue receiued of their fathers from hand
to hand.
} ' Therefore the Romaniftes at this day do alleage nothingc elfe
but that, which it appeareth chat the lewes in old time alleaged whc
they were by the Prophetcs of the Lord reproued of bhndenes, vn-
godhncs and idolatry For they glorioufly boaftedofthetemple,Cc-^
r emonies& prieftlToodes,by which things, by great reafon as they
thinke they mcafur 1 the Church. So in fteede of the Church, they
fhcwe ccrtaine outwarde vifours, that oftentimes are farre from the
Church,and without v/htch the Church may very well ftand.Thcre-
fore we neede<o confute them with no other argument , then that
er.7.4 wherewith Hieremy fought againft the foolifli prefumptuoufnes of
the Iewes:thatis,that they fhould not boaft in lying wordes, faying*
The temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord, it is the temple of
the Lorde. Forafmuch as the Lord doth no where acknowledge any
thiage for his , but where his word is heard and rcuerently obicrued.
So when the glory of God did /it betwene the Cherubins in the San-
ixc. 10. duary,& he had promifed tliem that that (hould be his ftedfaft (i^Mc:
h y et^hen che Pacftes once corrupted the worftiippiagc of himXvith
peruerfc
To Saluation. Lib.4. 434
pcrucrfcfupcrftitionshc remould elfc where, & Icfttbc place wjth-
ouc any holincfle. It the fame temple which feemcd to be holily ap-
pointed to the pel pctuall dwclhng ot God,mJi^ht be forfake ot God
and become vnholy:there is no caufc why thefe men (hould faine to
vs chat God is Co bound to perfons or places, and Co faft tied to out-
ward obieruations , that he muft nccdcs abide with them that hauc
oncly the title and (hcwc of the Church. And this is it about v/hich
Paulc contcndeth in the Hpiftle to the Romaincs,fiom th:: 9. chap-
ter Co the I z.For this did fore trouble wcake cofcienceSjthat the Ic«
wcs when they fcemed to be the people of God, did not only rcfufc
the dodrine of the GofpelLbut alfo pcrfecute it.Thcrforc after that
he hath fct out the doifti ine,he remoueth this dour,and denicth that
thofc lewcs bcinge enemies of the tructh are the Church, howfoc-
ucr they wanted nothinge that otherwife might be required to the
outward forme of the Church. And therefore he denicth it, becaufc
they embraced not Chrift.But fomwhat more cxprcfly in the Eo.ftlc GaU.4,
to the Galathiansrwhcrein coparing Ifmael with llaache fay ih that » ».
many hold place in the Church, to whom the inheritance bclongcth
not, becaufe they are not begotten of the free mother. From whence
alfo he defcendeth to the comparifon of two Hierufalems.Bccaufc as
the lawc was giuen in the mount bina , but the Gofpcll came out of ""
L' Gen. 21
a
Hicfufalem.Somany being feruilely borne and brought vp do with-
out doutinge boafl themfelues to be the children of God and of the
Church,yca they proudly dcfpife thcnarurall children of God,vvhc
ihcfclues be but baftard s. On the other fide alfo,when we hearc that
it was once pronounced from heauenrCafl out the bond woman and
her fonne, let vs, {landing vppon this inuiolable decree, boldely dc-
fpife their vnfauery boaflings^For if they be proud by realon of out-
ward profeflion, Ifmael was alfo circumcifed:ifthcy contcnde by an-
tiquity ,he was the fiift begotten, and yet we fee that he is put away.
If the caufe be demaunded , Paulc afligneth it, for that none arc ac- Ro^ 6
compted children, but they that are begotten of the pure and lawful
feeds of dodrine . According to this rcafon God denicth that he is
boundc to wicked Pricfles by thi^ that he couenanted with their Fa-
ther Lcui that he fhoulde be his Angcll or interpreter : yea he tur-
ncth againll themfelues their falfe boalhng,whcrwith thcv were wont
to rife vpagainft theProphetes, thatthedignuy ofPricfthoode was
tobehad infingularcflimition . This he wjllingcly admitteth, and.
with the fame condition he debateth with them, becaufc he is ready
to keepe his couenant»but when rhcy do not muru.^l!y ptrrfoi m tlieir
pa<-c 10 him^chey defJbruc to be reid<^tL d.Loe what fucccfCon auaicth,
.-"■ Ill li
4 1. '
Cap.2. Of the outward meancs
vnlcirc therewithal be alfb ioyncd aninuitatioa & cucnly continth*
inge courfe : cucn to this cft'edthat the fucccflbrs, fo foonc as they
be proued to hauc fwarued from their originall , be depriued ot all
honor. VnieiTc pcthappcs becaufe Caiphas fucceeded many Godly
-^Bifhoppcs ( yea there w2S cucn from Aaron to him a continuall vn-
broken courfc of fuccclTion) thc;^forc that fame mifchicuous affem-
bly was worthy the name of the Church.But this were not tolerable
cucn in earthly dominions, that the tyranny of Caligula, Nero,
Heliogabalus and fuch other , ihould be called a true fiate of Coni'.
mon wcalcjfor that they fucceeded the Brute$,Scipions,& Camilles.
But fpccially in the gouernemcnt of the Church there is nothingc
more fonde,than icauinge the Dodrinc to fet the fucccflion in the
Pcrfons oncly , but neither did the holy dodours whom they falfcly
thrurt in vnro vs,mcane any thing leilc,then to pray that precifeiy as
it were by right o^inheritanc^Churchcs be there where Bilhops arc
fuccefTiiiely placed one after an othcr.But where as it was then out
of controucrficjthat from the very beginninge to that age nothingc
was chaungcd in Dodrine > they alleaged that which might fuffifc
to make an ende of all news errours , that is , that by thofc was that
dodrme oppugned,whjch had bin cucn from the Apoftles conftanc*
ly and with one agreeinge con fent retained . There is therefore no
caufejwhy they (hould any longer go forward to decciue by preten-
ding a falfe colour vndcr the name of the Church, which we do reuc-
rcntly eftemc as becommeth vsrbut when they come to the definitio
of It, nor only water (as the common fay inge is)cleaucth vnto them,
but they fticke faft in their ownemyre becaufe they put a ftinkingc
harlonn place ofthe holy (poufe of Chrift . That this puttinge in of
a changeling ihoulde not dcceiue V5,befidc other adfnonitions,let v$
Ac^ Vin remehcr this alfo of Auguftine.For fpeaking of the Church,hc fayth.
cen.e Itis it thatis fomtime darkened, & couered with multitude ofoffcn-
pilU48. (.£5 asvviih a cloudc: fomccime'calmeneflc oftime appeareth quiet &
freerfomedme is hidden and troubled with waue of tribulations and
temptations. He bnngeth forth cxamplcs,y oftentimes theftrongcft
pillers cither vahanrly fuftred banifhmet for the faith,or were hidden
in the whole world.
4 In hke maner the Romaniftes do vexe vs,and make afraid the i-
gnorant with the name of the Church,whereas they be the deadly c-
nemres of ChrilijThercfore ahhough they p« etende the temple, the
priefthoode and the other fuch ounv.^td (hevvcs, this vaine ghftjingc
wherewith the eies of thefirnpl?be djfcledou^hc nothing to mouc
vs CO graunt chat there is a Church where the Word of God doth not
appearc.
To Saluation. Lib.4. 435
tppearc.For this is the perpetual markcwhcrwiih Godhsth marked
them that be his.Hc that ii of the tructh (faith hc)heareth my voice. loh.i f,
Againcjl am that good fticpchcrd.and I know my {hcpe,& am kno- '^* ^^
wen of them. My fhcpe hcare my voyce, and 1 know them and they ' '
follow mc. And a iitlc before he had fayd,that the flicpc follow their
fhepeherd , bccaufc they know his voice:but they follow not a itran-
gcr , but runnc away from him, bccaufe they kno we not the voice of
ftrangers.Why are we therefore wilfully mad in iudging the Church,
whereas Chrift hath marked it with an vndoutful {igne,which whcr-
foeucr It is fecne can not dccciue , but that it ccrtaincly (he wcth the
Church to be therc:but where it is not,iherc rcmaincth nothing that
can giue a true fignification of the Church. For Paulc rehearfc^h that Ephe.t,
the church was buildcd,not vpon the iudgcmentes of men,not vpon *«*•
pncfthoodes , but vpon the dodrinc of the Apoftles and Prophetes.
But rather Hicrufalcm is to be fcuerally knowen from Babilon , and
the Church of Chrift from the confpiracy of Satan,by that difference
wherewith Chrift hath made them different one from the orher . He
that is of God(faith he)heareth y Words of God.Ye therefore hearc lohn. t
not,bccaufe ye arc not of God.In a fumme/orafmuch as the church '*7»
ii the kingdom of Chrift,& he rcigneth not but by his word,can it be
now doutfull to any man, but that thofe be the wordes of lyinge, by
which Chriftes kingdome is fained to be without his fcepter , that i$
to fay wijhout his holy word ?
1 But now where as they accufc vs of Schifmc & herefic, becaufe
we both preach a contrary dodrine to them,& obey not their bwcs,
and hauc our aflcmblics to Praicrs,to Baptifmejto the miniftraiion of
the Supper,and orher holy doing$,feuerally from themrit is in dcede a
very fore accufation, but fuch as nedeth not a long or laborfomc dc-
fcnce.They are called hcretikcs & fchifmatike$,which making a di-
uifion, do breakc in funder the communion of the Church. And thit
communion is holden together with true bondcs , that is to fay ,thc Li.<|uc
agrcmentof true Dodrine,& brotherly charity.WherUpon Auguftin fti.eua^
putteth this difference betwenc heretikcs & fchifmatik«$, that here- !^*^""^ "
tikes in dede do with falfe dodrines corrupt the purenes of faith, but , *
the Schifmatikcs fomeiime euen where there is like faith, do breakc
ihe bondc of felowftiip.But this is alfo to be noted, that this coniojri-
nitlg of charity fo hangcth vpon the vnity of Faith, that Faith oughc
to be the bcginningc thereof, the endc, and finally the only rule.Lct
vs therefore remember that fo oft as the vnity of the Church is com*
«n|ded vhto vs,this is requircd,that while our mindes agree in Chrift,
our wiU alfo may be ioyaed toother w muiuall wel willing io Chrift
J'»» ". Ill iij
Cap.2. Of the outward mcancs
Eph.4. 5 Therefore Paule,when he cxhortcch vs to that well willingc,takciK
Phili. a. £qj. j^J5 fundation that there is one Go(i,one F aith, & one Baptifmc*
»• & 5 • Yea vvherfoeuer he teacheth vs to be oFonc mindc , and of one will,
he bvandby addeth in Chrift,or according to ChnR.-meaningy it is a
fadious copany of the wicked, & not agremcnt o£the faithful which
is without the word of the Lord.
6 Cyprisn alfo following Paulderiueth the whole fbutainc of the
agreement of the Church,from the only Ufl^opiikeofChnft.He af-
terward addctli the Church IS but one.whjjrhfpredcth abroad more
largely into a multitude with encrcafe of frutetijln<;;ire : like as there,
be m?\\y funnebccimcs.but one lighr.and many braunches of a tiee,
bur one body grounded vpon a fail rootc : And when many ftrcamcs
do ftow from one foiintaine,a!ihoush the number (tcme tu be fcat-i
tered abroadc by largenes of ouerflowing piety ,yct the vnity abideth
in the originall. Takeaway a beamc ot the iunne from the body,thc
vnity can fuffer no diuilion.Brcake a braunchfrom the tree.thc bro-
ken braunch can not fpring.Cut of the ftreart'C from tl^e fprint; bed,
bemg cut of it drieth vp.So alfo the church being ouerlpred with the
light of the Lord, is extended ouer the whole worl.d:yet there is but
one hght that is fpred euery where. Nothmg could be fayd more fitly
to exprefl'e that vndiuidable knitting together, which all the mebcrs
of Chrift haue one with an other.We Ice how he continually calleth
vs backe to the very head. VVhcrupon he pronounceth that herefief
$i fchifmes do arife hereof, that men do not returne to the originall
of cru5th,nordofckcthehcad,norkcpethe dodnne of the hcauely
itiaiftBr, No«r let the go & cry that we be heretikcs that haue depar-
ted {t6 their Church:(ith there hath bin no caufe of oui tftranginge
from tbcm but this orte,that they can in no wife abide the pure pro-
feilliig of the trueth.-but I tell not how they haue driucn vs out with
curiingies and cruel execrations.Which Very felfe doing doth abun-
datly enough acquite vs,vnles they wil alfo condemne the Apoftles
forScWnnatikcSjWith whom wchauc all one caufe.Chrift(i fay)did
forcfay to his Apoftles, that the time (hould come when they (hould
be caftout of the Sinagogcs for his names fake. And thofc Sjnagogc$
of which hefpeakctlvwcrethen accomptcd law^full Churchps.Sith
fherforcitiscuid^ntihat we bccaftour,& we bt ready 10 fhcwy the
fame is <Jonc for ^he riSrHes fake ofChrift,truely the caufe ought (\til
Co be enquired of,befbre that any thin.>c be determined vpon v<-,«*'
therorve w^y orothcr.Howbeii,if they wil,I am cotent to difchargp
them of this point, f'or it is enough for me, that it behoued that we
(hould depart from thcm,that wc might come to Chrift. , 1 . , :^^
4.. - » 7 Buc
ToSaluatlon, Lib.4. "'43^
'f Butitfliallappeareyct morcccrtaincly, invvfijitcftimation-A'c
ought to hauc ail the Churclies whom the tyranny of that Romifhc
idoll hath polTeflcdjif it be compared with the old Church of the If-
raclitcs , as it is defcnbed in the Prophctcs . There was then a true
Church among the Icwes and irraelites,whcn they continu d in the
Jawes of the couenam, for they obtained thofe thing* by rhe bcnertt
of Godjwheruponthc Church coliltcth.They had the tructhofJo-
^rine in the lawrthc mmiftcry thereof was among the Prieftcs & the
Prophcts:with the fignc of circumcifion they entred into rehgion:by
other Sacraments they were cxcrcircd to the confirmation of Faith.
It is no dout that thofe titles wherwith the Lorde hath honored his
Churchjfitly pertained to their felowfhip. After that, forfakinge the
law of the Lord, they went out of kinde to idolatry and fupcrftition,
they partly loft that prcrogatiue.For who dare take away the name of
the Church from them , with whom God hath left the preaching of
his word and obfcruation of his myftenes.^Againe, whadare cal ihac
the Church without any exceptio, where y word of y Lord is open-
ly & freely troden vnder foote.^whcre the miniftery tl»€rof,thc chief
Cnew,yca the very foule of the Church is dcftroyed ? 'on o
• 8 What then?wili fome man fay:was there therfore no parcel of a
Church remaining among the Icwes after that they M away to ido-
latry?The anfwerc is eafie. Firft I fay y in the very falling away there
were ccrtaine dcgrecs.For we wil not fay that there was all one falle
of luda, and Ifraell, at fuch time as they both firft fwarucd from the
pure worlliipping of God. When larobeam firft made calue5,againft
the open prohibition of God, 8c did dedicate an vnlawfuH place for
^vorlblpplnf»,he did vttcrly corrupt religion.Thc lewes did firft defile
themfelues with wicked & fupetftitious maners before y they wrogi
fully chanf^cd the order in the outward forme of rehgio.For althogh
vnder Rcchabeam they had already gotten them many pcruerfeCe-
remonie&jyet becaufc there taried atHierufalcm both the Dofirine
of the Law,& the Priefthoodc,and the Ceremonious vfeges in fuch
{on as God had ordained the , the godly bad ihff^ a tolerable ftard
of Church . Amoni^c the Ifrachtcs vnto the reigne of Achab,thcre
was no amend ^mcnt of things, and from thcnfe forth they feli from
vrotfe to worfe.They that fucceded afcerward,tothe very deftrudion
of the kingdom,partly were like vnto him,& partly (when they min-
ded xo befomwhar betrer than he) they folowcd the example of la-
robeam : but they all euery one were v/ickcd and idolaters. In lewry
there were nowe and then diu^rfc changes, while fome kinges per-
Ucrted the worfhippingc of God vvilh falfc and fargcd fupcrlhiionS|
>-£ III iii)
Cap,2. Uttne outward mcancs
fome other rcftorcd religion that was dccaied: vmil the very prieftcf
themfclues deiiled the temple of God with prophanc & abhomina*
ble vfages.
9 Now let the Papiftes if they can howe much Ibcucr they cxtc«
nuatc their owne faultes,deny that among them the ftaic of religion
is a« corrupt and defiled as it was in the kingdom of Ifraell vnder la-
robeam.But they haue a groflfer idrJatric; & in dodrme they arc not
onedroppc purcrrvnlelTc paraduenturc euen in it alio they be more
vnpurc . God, yea all men that are endued but with a meane iudgc-
ment, (halbe wiineflcs with me, and the thingc it felfe alfo declareth,
how herein I tell nor hinge more then trueth. Nowe when they will
driue V5 to the communion of the Church, they require two thingcs
of vs : fiift, that wc fhoulde communicate with all their praiersjfacra-
mentcs,and Ceremonicsrthen that whatfoeuer honor,power and iu-^
rifdi(^ion Chrift giueth to his Church , we ihoulde giue the fame to
their Church. As to the firft point,! graunt that ali the Prophets that
were at Hicrufalem., when thinges were there very much corrupted,
did neither fcuerally racnfice,nor had aifcmbhes to pray feueralfrom
other men.For fhey had a commaundement of God , whereby they
Ixo.a^, were commaundcd to come together into Salomons temple : they
9* knew that the L' uiticall prieftes , howefoeuer the^ were vnwori hy of
that honor jyctbecaufe they were ordained by the Lord minifter^ of
the holy Ceremonies, & were not as then depofed,did yet ftill right-
fully poffeflTe that place. But ( which is the chicfe point of this cjucfti*
on ) they were dompcllcd to no fuperftitious worfhippinge, yea they
tookein hande to do nothing but that which wj»s ordained by God.
But among thefc men,I meanc the Papiftes,what like chincjis thcre>
For wc can fcarccly haue any meetinge together with them , where-
in we flaall not defile our fekies with open ulolatrie. Truely the prin-
cipal! bonde of their communion is in the mafle , which we abhorre
as the greateft facrilege. And whether we do this rightfully or wrong-
lully , (halbe feene in an other place . At this prefent it is enough to
(hew chat in this behalfc wc arc in other cafe tha the Prophets wcrc>
which although they were prc/cnt at the Ceremonies of the wicked^
were not coptUed to behold or vfe any Ceremonies but fuch as were
inftitute by God . And , if they will necdes haue an example altoge-
ther like , lettc vs take it out of the kingdom of Ifraell. After the or-
dinance of lerobeam Circumcifion remayned , the facrifices were
offered, the lawe was accomptcd holy , the fame God was called vp?.
t.lCing pon whom they had receiued of their Fathcrsibuc for the forged and
^ 2'3>* forbidden formes of worfhippingc . God diiallowcd and condemned
aU
To Saliiation. Lib.4. 437
all that was there done Shcwc me one Prophet , or any one godly
man that ones worlhippcd or faciiliccdm Bcthcll. For they knc.vc
they couldc not do jt, but that they Ihould detile thcmlcUics wirh
(bme facriiegc. Wc haiic then thus much , that the communion of
the Church ought not fo farre to be of force with the ^otlly, that if
it ihould degenerate to prophane and Hlthy vfages,ihcy (houid forth
with of neccflicie followe it.
10 But about the other pointe wc contcnde yet mote carncftly.
For if the Church be fo conlidered to be iuch, whocs lud^tmcnt wc
ou£ht to rcucrcncc , whoes authontie to regarde, whoes monitions
to obey ,withw hoes chaAifcments lo be moutd, whocs communion
in all things we ought religioufly to obrerue:thcn wc can not graunt
them a Church,but ihai we muft of neceffity be boundc to fubiedio
and obedience vnto it. Yet we will willingly graunt them that which
the Prophets graumed to the lewcs & ifraelitcsof theirtimeiwhen
things were there m as good,vca or in beittt ftatc. But we fee houc
eche where they cne out, that their aiiembhes arc vnholy, to which
it is no more lawtfullto confenc than ir is to denic God. And trucly
if thofc were Churcl>e$ , it foUoweth rhcrfore that in Ifraeil Helms*,
^ichcas and fuch other :in luric, Efaie, lercmie, Ofecandoth* r of
that fortCjwhom the Prophets, priefts and people of that time hated ' Tia
and dc tc ttc d v/or fc than any vncircumcikd men, were ftraiinticrs 3-^5
from the Church of God.lf thofe were Churches,then th- Church
was not the piller of truth, butthcfby of lieng:not the taberjtacle
of thehuing God , but the receptacle of idoles. Therefore it was
ne^defull for them to depart fiom the confent of thoic airemblies,
which was nothing els but a wicked confpiracic againit God. In hkc
fnaner »f any man acknowledge thcaflembhcsat thcfc daycs being
detilcd with idolatrie , fuperttition and wicked dodrine, to be fuch in
whocs full communion a Chriftian man ought to continue cuen to
the cofcntcof dodrine.hefliaW^reatly erre.For if they be Churches
then they hape the power of the keyes. But the keyes are vnfepara-
bly knitte with the word , which is from thenfe quite driuen away.
AgainC) if they be Churches, then the promife of Chrift is of force
amon^ theni,whatrocuer ye bindc.&c. But they contrari wife do ba- Mat \
fiifhe from their communion all fuch as do profeflc themfclues not '^ *
fainedly the fcruates of Chrift.Thcrfore either the promife of Chrift J^. '
isvainejoratleaftinthisrefpe^ they are not Churches. Finally in jj/
Hede of the minifterie of the word they hauc fcholes of vhgodh-
neifcjanda (inkeofall kindcs of errors. Therefore cither m this
refpedc chey arc not Churches , oc there fhali rcmaine no token
Vvcip.z, v^r tiic oucwarac mcancs
whereby the lawcfuli aflemblics of the faithfuU may be fcucrally
knovvcn from the meetinges of Turkes.
1 1 But as in the olde time there yet remained among the Icwc$
ccrtaine peculiar prerogatiucs of the Church, fo at ibis day alfo wc
take not from the Papiftes luch ftcppes as it pleafed the Lorde to
haue remaining among them after the diffipatio of the Church.Thc
Loide haddeones made his coucnant with the Jewes. That fame
rather bemgc vpholden by the fredfaftneffc of it felfe didde continue
with (triuing againft their vngodlin£fl"e,than was preferued by them.
Therefore ( fuch was the afi'urednelfe and conftancie of Goddet
poodncfle) there remained the couenatit of the Lord, neither could
his fairhfulnefle be blotted out by their vnfaithfuinefTerneither could
Circumcifion be (o prophaned with their rncleane handes,but that
it ftill was the figne and facramenr of that couenante. Whcrcuppon
the childcrn that were borne of them , the Lorde called his ownc,
which vnleflc it were by fpecial bleffing.belonged nothing to him.So
when he hath left his couenaunt in Frauncc,ltaly,Germany,Spaine^
Englande : fins thofe prouinccs haue bene oppreffcd with the ty*
ranny of Ancichrift, yet that his couenaunt might remaine inuiola-'-
ble,iirft he there preferued Baptifme,the tcftimonie of his couenanr,
which being cofecrate by his owne mouth reteineth her owne force
notwithftanding the vngodhnefleof man:then,with his prouidence
he hath wrought that there fhould remaine other rcmnantes , Icaft
the Cliurch should be vtterly deftroyed. And as oftentimes bildingei
are fo pulled downei that the foundations and mines reimaine:fo he
haih not fuffred his Church either to be ouerthrowen by Antichrift
from the very foundation,or to be laid euen with the grounde(how«
foeuer to puniflithe vnthankfijlnefie of men that had defpifed his
word , he fuftVeth horrible (haking and didipation to chaunce) but
euen after the very wafting he willed that thebilding half pulled
downclliould yet remaine. •
J 1 Whcras therefore wc will not fimply graunt tq the Papiftes
the title of the Church,we do not thcrfore deny that there be Cimr?-
ches among them : but onely we contende of the true and lawefull
ordcrmg of the Churchrwhich is required in the communion both
of thcfacramcnts which arethefignes ofprofeflion.biit alfofpc-
an. p. cially of do6lrine.Daniel and Paule foretolde that Anrichrift (hould
72_ fitte in the temple of GodAVith vs we accompt the bifl^op of Rome
hecaptsine and ftandard bearer of that wicked and abhominable
The. 2
kini^dome. Whereas his feate is placed in the temple of God,theieby
is nieant (bac his kingdorae fhalbe fuch as.can not abolifhtbc name
To Saluanon. Lib.4. 438
of Qirtft nor of his Church. Hereby iherfore appc3rcth,that we do
not deny bur that eucn vnder his tyrannic remain Churches:but luch
as he hath prophancd with vngodhneifc full of facnlegc , fuch as he
hathafflided with ourragious dominion , fuch as he hath corrupted
and in maner killed with cuijl & damnable dodnnes,as with pciloncd
drmkcs : fuch wherein Chrift Jierh halfc buried , the Gofpcll oucr-
whelmed, godlmefle banifhcd, the worOiipping of God in a mancr
abohfhcd :Tuch finally whcrin all things are lo troubled, that thciin
tathcr appereth the face of Babylon then of the holy c:tic q£Go J.
Ina fumme, I fay that they be Churches, in lefped that the Loidc
there marucloufly preferucththe rcmnauntesof his people lowc-
foeuer they were di(pcrfed and icatccred abroadc ,inrefpcdc rhac
there remaine fome tokes of the Church, fpecially thcfe tokens,thc
cft'cdualneflc whereof neither the craft of the Dcuil ,nor tiie mali-
cioufnelfe of man can dcftioy. But on the oilier (ide bccaufe thefc
markcs arc blotted out, which in this difcourfe we ought principally
to hauc refped vmo, 1 fay that eoery one of their aflcmbiics and the
yvholc body wantcih the lawefuU forme of a Church.
The iij. Chapter.
O/the ttachers and minijitrs of the C(n*r-ch,and of their ele^ion and office.
"Owe it is mete that we fpcake of the order, by which it was
theLordvS willto hauchis Church gouerncd. For alciK)Ui;h
in his Church he onely muft rule and reigne,yea and bcare
preeminence or ^xccllc in it , and this gouernmenc to be
vfed or executed by his oneiy word .-yet becaufc he dwellcih nor
ampng vs in vi(ible prefence , fo that he can prefently with his ownc Mat.j
xrouthdeclare his will vnto vs, we haue fayed that in thishevfeth • ••
die mintfterie of men, and as it were the trauaille of deputies, not in
transferring his right and honour vnto them,but oncly that by their
moiith he rnight do his owne workCjlike as a workcman to do his
worke yfeth hi> inftrumem. I am compelled to repetc againc thofc
things that I haue already declared. He might in decde do it cither
by himfelfe without any other hdpc or jnftrumcnt, or alfoty tne;*nc
of Angells : but there arc many caufes why he had rather do it by
ipcn. For by this meanc firft he declareth his goodwill toward vs,
vbcn he taiketh out of men them that, {hall do his mcfTigc in the
world, that ilialbc the interpreters of his fecret will , finally that fliall
reprcfent his owne perfon. And fo by experience he proueth tlutit
i^ not vainc chat cotnm only hcc«4^echvs his temples, whenoucof
Cap.j. Or the outwarde mcancs
the mouchcs of men,as out of his randuane,he geucth aun(wcrc$ t©
oguft. mcn.Sccondly5this is the beft and moft profitable cxcrcifc to humi-
!> I de litic , when he accuftometh vs to obey his worde , howefocuer it be
oan. preached by men hke vnto vs,yea fomctime our inferiors in dignity.
"* '• If he himfelfe fpake from heauen, it were nomarucllif his holy
Oracles were without delay reucremlyrccciued with the cares and
mindes of all mcn.For who would not drede his power being in pre-
sence? who would not be throwcn downc at the firfl: fight of fo great
maicfty ? who woulde not be confounded with that infinite biight-
nclFe? But when fome filly manrifen out of the duft fpcaketh in the
name of God, here with very good tcftimony we declare our godli-
ncflc and rcucrent obedience toward God himfelfe , if to his mini-
fter we yelde our felucs willing to learne , which yet in nothing ex-*
^^j.^ cclleth vs. Therefore for this caufe alfo he hath hidden the treafure
.7, of his heauenly wifedome in brickie & earthen vcflTclsjthac he might
haue the ccrtainer profe howe much he is cftcemcd of vs Morcoucr
there was nothing fitter for the cherifhing of mutuall charirie, than
that men ihould be bound together one to an other with this bonde,
when one is made a paftor to teach the reft , and they that are com-
maunded to be fcholars receiue all one doi^rine at one mouth. For
if eucrv man were able cnoug;h to feruc himfelfe , and needed not
tlic helpc of another: fuchis the pride of mans nature, that euery
one would dclpife other, and (hould againc be defpifed of them.
Therfore the Lord hath bounde his Church with that knortc, which
he forfawe to be the ftrongeft knottc to hould vnity togcthcr,whea
he hath leftc with men the dodrine of faluation , and of eternall life,
that by their handes he might communicate it to the reft Hereunro
l>h.4» Paule had refpc^ when he wrote to the Ephefians , One body one
rpiiir,asalfo ye be called in one hope of your calline.One Lord»one
faith, oncBaptifme. One God, and the fatherof all, which is abouc*
aU,and by all,and in vs all.But vnto euery one of vs grace is gcucn ac-
cording to thcmeafure of the gift of Chrift . Wherefore he faith?
When he was gone vp on hy , he ledde captiuitie captiuc , he gauc
giftcs to men. He that wente downe is the felfe fame he,that wcntc'
rpjthai hd*might fulfill all things. And the fame hath gcuen fome to'
be Apoftlts, and fome Prophets, and fome Euangehftes , and other
Ibmc Paftors and teachers , vnto the rcftoring of the holy ones , tor
the workc of miniftration,to the edifying of the body of Chrill,vntit
we come all into the vniiic of faith , and of the knowledge of the
Sonne of God , into a pcrfcd man , into the meafure of full growen
age: chat we be no mo|:e jchildren chat may bp c^ti^d about witH
cucry
To Saluation. Lib.4. 43^
cucry windc of do^rinc : buc following truth in charicie i let vs in all
things growc into him that is ihched,cuenChrift,in whomeihe
whole body conioincd and compadcd together by all thciointof
rubmini{trati6,according to the working m mcafure of eucry parte,
makcth enacal'c of the body,vnto rhc edifying of it fclfc by charity.
1 By thefe words he {hewcth,that that niinillcrie of men,which
God vfeth in gouerning his Church is the chiefe finew, wherby the
faithful! cleaue together in one body : and alfo he (hewcth that the
Church can not otherwilc be prelcrucd fats, but if it be vpholde by
thefe ftaie$,in which it plcafed the Lord to repofc the faluation of it,
Chrift (layeth he) is ^onc vp on hy , that he might fulfill all things. Fpfic.i
This li the maner of ful£ilhnti,ihat by his minifterSjto whom he hath »®«
committed that ofHcc , and hath gcucn the grace to execute that
workes he difpoleth and diftributcthhisgiftcs to the Church jyct
and after a certainc maner geueth himfelfe prefent, with extending
the power of his fpirit in this inf^itution, that it fhould not be vain or
idle.So is the rcftoringc of the holy ones performed : fo is the body
of Chrift edified : fo do we by all things growe into him that is the
bed, and do grow together among our felucs : (o are we all brought
into the vnitie of Chrift.if prophecic flourifti among vs,if wc recciue
the Apoftles,if we rcfiife not the dodrinc miniffred vmo vs. There- Epl»»4"
fore he gocih about the diffipatiojor rather the ruine & deflrudion ' *•
of the Church, whofoeucr he be that either endeuoreth to abolifh
this Order of whom we fpcakc , and this kinde of gouernement , or
minilheth the elfimatio of it as a thing not fo nccclfary. For neither
the light and heatc of the funnc,nor mcate & drinke are fo neceflary
to nourifh and fuHeine this prefeni Iife.as the office of Apoftlcs and
paffors is neceilaric to prefcrue the Church in earth.
} Therefore I haue aboue admoniOied , that God hath often-
times with fuch titles as he could,commendcd the dignitie thereof
vnto v$ 3 that wc ihould haue it in moft hy honour and price , as the
moft excellent thing of all. He teitifieth that he geueth to men a fin-
gular benefite, in raifing them vp tc.Tchers, where he commaundcth Efa jj
the Prophet to crie out that faire arc the fccte, & blelTed is the com- 7.
ming of them that bring tidings ofpcacc: and when he calleth the ^^^'-f
Apoftles the light of the world^and falte of the earth.Neither could I '* *"
this office be more honourably aduanced , than it was when he faid: Luk u
He that heareth you , hcareth me. He that defpifeth you , defpifeth '*•
me. But there is no place more plainc, than in Paule in his feconde * ^°'
Epiftlc • o the Corinthians, where he as it were of purpofe cntrcatcth ^'p
of this matter. Hq affirmcth therefore , that there is noiliingin the j.^^ '
Cap,
3 , Of the outwarde mcanes
Church more cxcellet or glorious than the minittery of the Gofpcl*
f. or.g fQj-gfjpu^j^ 35 jf J5 jt^g aciininiftration of the Spirit , andof righteoufi
neiVe,arKl of etcrnall life. Thefeandhke fayingsfeiucto this pur-
pofc, that 'hat order of goui rning & prefer uing the Church by mi^
niftcrs, which the Lord hath ftablilhed for euer, ihould not growc
out of cthmation among ySjand fo at length by very contempt grow
outof vfe.And howe great is the neceffity thereof,he bach declare'i
not onely by wordes , but ahb by examples. VVhtn his wiil was to
\St. lo. {^mQ more fuily to Cornelius with the light of his trueth , he feme
La.o.<J ^" Anaeil from heauen to fende Peter vnto him. When his will was
to call Paulc to the knowledge of himfclfe, and to engrafte htm into
the Church, he fpake not to him with his owne voice, but fente him
to a man,of whom he ihould receiue both the dodiine of faluation,
andthc fanchficationof Baptifo'ie. If it be not done without caufe,
that an Ane;ell,which is the interpreter of God, do himfclfe abftemc
from declaring the will of God, but commaundcth thataman be
fcnte for, to declare it; and not without caufe that Chrift the onely
iXor, fcholemaiiter of the faithfull committcth Paule to the fchoohng of a
*•*• man, yea cuen that fame Paulc whom he had determined to take Vp
into the rhirde heauen , and to vouchfaue to graunt him miraculous
rcuelation of things vnfpeakable:whois there novve that dare delpiic
that miniftciy.or p'.ifle it ouer as a thing fuperfluous,the vfe whereof
it hath plcalcd God to make approued by luch examples?
4 Thev that hauc rule of the goucrnment ot the Church ac-
•ph 4. cording to the inftitution of Chrift,are named of Paul fiitt Apoftlcs^
i 1, then Prophrts, thirdly Euangeliftes, fourtlily Paftors, laft of ail tea-
chers. Of which, the twoo laft alone haucordinarie office in the
Church: the otherthrec the Lordc raifcdvp at the begmningof
his kinedome, and fometimc yet alfo raifeth vp , as the neccflltie of
War.itf. ^"^" requireth.What is the Apoi^les office, appearcth by that com*
15. * maundcment : ^o , prcache the Gofpeli to eucry crcature.There arc
not cerraine boundes appointed vnto them : but the whole world is
alTi^ned them , zo be brought into the obedience of Chnft : that in
fprcadmg the Gofpeli among all nations wherefoeuer they {hall be
lorn. I ' ^^^^» ^''^y ^^y ^^'"^^ where rahfe vp his kingdome. Therefore Pauic,
9. ana when he wcnte about to prouc his Apof^lclliip , rehcarkth that he
to. harh gotten to Chrilt not foroe one citie , but hath farre and wide
fpred abrode the Gofpeli : and that he hath not layed his handcs to
an other mans fundacio,but plated Churches where the name of the
iphc4 Lorde had neucr bene heard of. Therefore the ApolHcs were fente
ii. to bring backc the world from failing away , vmo true obedience of
God*
To Saluation. Lib.4. 440
God, and cchc where to ftabiilh his kingdomc by preaching ot the
Gofpelhor (if you hke thac better) as the hi ft bilders of the Chuich,
to lay the fundations thereof m all the world. Prophctcs he cailcth,
not all expolitors of Gods wiJl whatroeuer they be , but thofc thac
by (ingular reuelation excelled , fuch as at this time cither be none»
orarcleffc notable.By Euangcliftes I vndcrftandctiiofe, which when
indignity they wcrcleCfe than the Aportles,y et in office were nextc
vnto them, yea and occupied their roonits. Such were Luke, Timo- Luk.iq
thee , Titus and other like : and paraducnture alfo the feucntie Dif- '•
ciplcs.whom Chrift appointed in the fecondc place after the A- "**"
poftles. According to this expofition(which feemcth totnc agrcablc
both with the wordes and meaning of Paule ) thole three offices
were not ordcincd in the Churche to this ende that they lliould be
pcrpetuall , but onely to fcrue for that time wherein Churches were
to be ereded , where were none before , or at Waft to be remoucd
from Mofes to Chnft. Albeit I denie not,butthat afterward alfo the
Lordc hath fometime raifcd vp Apoftles , or at leaft in their places
Euangcliftes,3S it hath bene done in our timc.For it was needcfull to
hauc fuchjto brin;^ backe the Church from the falling awayof An-
tichrift. Yet the office it fclfe I do ncuerthelelie call extraordinarir,
bccaufc itliath noplace in the Churches already well let in order.
Next after thcfc are Paftors and Teachers, whomc the Church may
neucr lackc:bctwcne whom I thmke that there is this difterencc,that
the Teachers are not appointed to bearc rule ot dilciphnc i nor for
the miniftration of Sacramentes,nor admoniftiments or exhorta-
tions , but onely to expoundc the Scripture , that pure and foundc
dodnne maybe kept among the faithfull. But the office of Paftor
contcincth ail thefe things within it.
1 5 Nowc we haue , which were tbofc minifterics in the Church
that continued but for a time , and which were thofe that were or-
deincd to endure perpetually. It we ioine the Euangehftes with the
Apoftlcs, we llial hauc remaining two couples after a certaine mancr
aunfwennge the one to the other. For as our Teachers are like to
the oide Prophets , in fuch fort are our Paftois hke to the Apoftlcs,
The office oi Prophets was roore cxcellcnt,by reafon ot the iln^ular
gifte that they had of reuelation: but the office of Teachers hath
ina maner like order , and altogether the fame ende. So thofc. xij. Luc.&
whom the Lorde did choofc , that they fhould publifh abroadc to • ^•
the world tiic newe preachine; of the Gofpcll, in dcgrc and dignitic ^*'**
went before the reft . For although by ihc meaning and propcrtic
of the word > all chc miniftcis of (he Church may be lighUy called
\o 16
r.
vlac-to.
I.
Cap.3, Of the outward meancs
ApoltlcSjbecaufc they arc feme of cbc Lordc,& arc his mcflcngcrs}
yc cbccaufe it was much bchouefuU, that there fiiould be a ccrtamc
knowledge had of the fending of them that Ihould bring a thing
newr and vnheard of, itVasneccflarie that thofc xij (to whoes
number Paule was afterwarde added) Ihould be garniilicd with fomc
peculiar title aboue the reft. Paule himfeife indccdcinone place
gcueth this name to Andronicus & lunias, whom he fayeth to hauc
bene notable among the Apoftles : but when he meancth to fpeakc
properly , he referrctli it to none orher but ro that principall degree.
And this IS the common vfe of the Scripture.Yet the Paftors (fauing
that eche of them do gouernc fcuerall Churches appointed to them)
haue all one charge with the Apoftles. Nowc what mancr of thing
that is. let vs yet hcare it more plainly. *
k>lac.iS 6 Tlie Lofde,when he fcnte the Apoftles, gauc them comauit*
>• dement (as we faid cuen nowe) to preach the Gofpell,3nd to baptifc
them that bele'uc vnto forgeueneffe of finncs. He had before com-
maundcdjihat they Ihould diftribute the holy figncs of his body and
bloud,as he had done. Loc here is a holy , inuiolablc and perpetual!
lawe layed vpon them that lucccdc in the Apoflles place , whereby
they receiue commandcment to preache the GcW'pell > and minifter
the Sacramets.Whereupon we gather,that they vvhich neglcd borh
theie things , do fafly fay that they bcare the perfon of the Apoftles.
.Cor.4 But what of the Paftors ? Paule fpeaketh not of himlelfe oncly , but
of them alljvvhen he fayeth : let a man fo efteemc vs as the tninifters
* 'of Chrift, anddiftiibuteisof the miftericsofGod. Againcinanr
other place.a Biihop muft be a faft holder of that faithful word which
is according to dodrine : that he may be able to exhorte by founde
dodrine, and to coijuince the gaine(;iyers.Out of thole and like pla-
ccSjwhich are cchwhcrc to be founde,we may gather jthat alfo in the
office of the Apoftles thefe he the two principall partes, to preach
the Gofpell,and to miniftcr the Sacraments. As for the order of tea-
ching , It confiftcth not only in publike Sermons, but belongcth aKb
l<ft.3o to pnuite admonitions.So Paul calleth the Ephcfians to witncfle that
©• he harh not fled from doing of any of thofe things that were for
their proHt , bur that he preach.ed and taught them both openly ancl
in eucry houfe,tcftif) ing both to the lewes and Grecians, repentacc
c. and faith in Chrift. Againc a little aftercthat he hath not ceaflcd with
, ,/ ' reares to admonifhe euery one of them.Ncither yet bclongeth it to
my purpofe at this prefent to expreife^all the quahticsof agood
P.iftor, bur onely to point out what they profefte that call themfelues
Paftors ; that is^that they are To made rulc|;s of the Church, not that
they
To Saluation, Lib.4. 441
they (hould hauc ^n idle dignity, but that they (houM with the doc-
trine of Chrift inftrud the people to true godlineflc,minilterthc
holy myfterics, and prcfcrue and excrcifc vpright difciplinc. ForEze. i
whofocucr be fcr to be warchcmcn in rhe Church , the Lorde deda- ' 7»
rcth vnto them, that if any bv their negligence perifli through igno-
rance,he will require the blcud at their handes.That alfo pcrtaineth
to ihcm all, which Paul fayeth of himftlferwo to me vnlcfle I preach
the Gofpell , forafnnich as the diftiibuting thereof is committed to
me. Finally what the Apoftles performed to the whole world , the '-^or
fame ought euery Paftor to pcrformc to his flockc to which he is *
appointed.
7 Albeit when we nfligne to cuery one their feueralJ Churches,
yet in the meanc whilf we do not dcnic but chat he which is boundc
to one Church may hc]peorhcrChurchcs,if any troublcfomc tiling
do happen thatrcquirerh his prefencc ,or if he be afked counfell of
any darkc matter . But foraimuch as for the kcping of the peace of
the Churchjthis policy is necclfaryahat there be fctte forth to cuery
man what he fhould do,lcaft all ^louldc be confufcly difordered,
runnc about without caJling ,-or rafhly runne altogether into one
place,and Icaft fuch as arc more caretull for their owne commodinc
than for the edification of the Church, fhoiild at their owne will
leauc their Churches vacant : this ordering ought commonly to be
kept fo nerc as may be jthat cuery man contented with his owne
boudes (hould not breake into an other mans charge. And this is no
inuention of man,but the ordinance of God himfelfe. For wc reade
that Paule and Barnabas created Prictts in all the feuerall Churches
of Liftra 5 Antiochc , Iconium : and Paule himfelfe commaundeth Aft 14
Tituf that he fhould appoince Prjcftiin euery towne.So in one place ^'•
he fpeaketh of the Bifboppcs of Philippcs , and in an other place of JlV '^
ArchippusBiftiopof theCoIoflians. And there remainethanota- Colo.l
ble Sermon of his in Luke , to the Pricfts of the Church of Ephefus. 1 7.
Whofocuer therefore (hall take vpon him the gouernment and ^^ ^"^
charge of one Church , let him knowc that he is bound tothislawc *
of Gods calling : not that as bounde to the fojlc(as the lawyers termc
it) that is, made bonde and fartencd vnto it> he may not ones moue
his footc from thenfc , if the common profit do fo require , fo that it
be done well and orderly : but he that is called into one place ought
not himfelfto thinke of remouine,norfcketo be dcliuercd as hclhal
thinke to be good for his commoditie. Then, if it be expedient that
any be remoued to an ot!»er place , yer he ou^tht not to attempt it of
his owne priuatc aduifc,but to tary for pubhke authontie.
KKK
Cap.3. Of the outwarde meaiies
8 But whereas I hauc without difference called them Br(hopf ,
and Pricfts,and Paftors,and Minifters,that rule Churches : 1 did that
according to the vfage of the Scripture, which indifferetly vfeth ihcfc
wordcs. Forwhofoeuerdo execute the miniftcry of the word , to
ihcm he geuetii the title of Bidiops. So in Paule , where Titus is
commaunded to appointc Priefts in euery towne , it is immediatly
added. For a Bifhop muft be vnreprouable.&c. So in an other pbcc
fit.i.j. he faluteth many Billiops in one Church. And in the ades it is rc-
^hi 1 1, hearfed , that he called together the Priefts of Ephefus , whom he
\^io. himfclfe in his ovvne Sermon calleth Bifhops. Herenowe it is to be
lom.i> noted, that hcthcrto we hauc recited none but thofe offices that
r. ftande in the minifterie of the word.-neiihcr doth Paule make men-
i. Cor. tion of any other in that fourth chapter which we hauc alleged. But
'*•**• in the Epiftle to the Romaines , and m the fiift Epiftle to the Corin-
thians, he reckeneth vp other offices, as powers, the gift of healing,
interpretation , gouerneraent , caring for the poore. Of the which I
omitted thofe that endured but for a timc,becaufe it is to no profita-
ble purpofe to tary vpon thcm.But there are two that do perpetually
abide,that is to fay,gouernement and care of the poorerGoaernours
I thinke were the Elders chofen out of the people,that fliould toge-
ther with the Bi{hops,haue rule of the iudgement of mancrj,and the
Yfing of difcipline. For a man cannot otherwife expounde that which
he fayeth : let him that ruleth do it with carefulnelfe. Therefore at
'^om.a. the bcginninge euery Church had their Senate, gathered of godly,
^' graue and holy men : which had that fame iurifdidion in correding
of vices , whereof we (hall fpeake hereafter. And that this was the
order of more than one agcexperience it felfe declareth.Thcrefore
this office of goucrnement is alfo nectffarie for all ages.
9 The care of the poore was comitted to the Deacons.Howbeit
to y Romaines there are fet two kindes. Let him that geueth (fayeth
Rom.1 i Paule in that place) do it in fimplicitie : let him that hath mercy,do it
9* in cherefulneffe. Forafmuch as it is certaine that he fpeaketh of the
publike offices of the Church , it muft needes be that there were
two feuerall degrees. Vnleffc my iudgement deceiue me ,in the firft
point he meaneth DeacoSjthat diftnbuted the almesrin the other he
fpeaketh of them that had geuen themfelues to loking to the poore
and ficke:of which fort were the widowes of whom hemaketh men-
tion to Timothee. For women could execute no other pubhk office,
but to 2;eue themfelues to the feruice of the poore.If we graunt this,
(as we muft needes graunt it) the there ihalWe two fortes of Dcacos:
of which one fort ftiall lerue in diftributing the things of the poore,
the
I Tim.
5.10.
ToSaluation, Lib4. 442
the other in loking to y poorc of the Church themfelues.But although
the very woriIDiaconi.T,Deaconiiecxtedeth further: yet the Scrip-
cure fpccially callctb the Deacons,co whom the Church hath geucn
the charge to dittnbutc rhe almcSjand to take care of the poore,and
hath appointed them as it were ftcwardes of the common crcafuric
of the pooreiwhoes begmning,inftitution and office, is dcfciibcd of
Luke in the Ades. For when a murmuring was raifedby the Grc- Aft.^.
cians - for that in the minilkrieof the poorc their widowes were
neglcfted , the Apr^ltlrs cxcudnc themlclues with faymg that they
could not ferue both offices.both the preaching of the word and the
miniftring at tables, rec^uired of the multitude, that there might be
chotcn. vij. honcft men ,to whom ihcy might commit that doing.
Loe what mancr of Deacons the Apoftolike Church had, and what
Deacons it were mete fot vs to haue according to their example.
10 Now whereas in tlie lioly aflemblie all things are to be done
in order and comely,there is nothing wherin that ought to be more
diligently obferued ,than in IhbUfhingthc order of goucrnemcnt:
becaufe there is no where gr. atcr peril! if any thing be done vnor-
dcrly. Therefore to the ende that vnquiet and troublelomcmcn
(which othcrwife would happe) (hould rafhly thruft in themlelues to
teach or to rule, it is exprtfl\ prouided , that no man fhould without
calling take vpon him a publikc office in the Church.Thercfore that
a man may be ludgcd a true minirter of the Church , firft he muft be
orderly called: thetj h<" muft aunfwere his vocation, that is to fay,
take vpon him and execute the duties enioined him. This we may
oftentimes marke in Paulerwhich when he mcaneth toapprouchis
Apoftlefhip , in a maner alway with his faithfulnefl'e in executing his
office he allegeth his calling. It fo ^reai a miniiter of Chnft dare not
take vpon himfelfe the authoritie that he fhoulde be heard in the
Church, but becaufe he both is appointed thereunto bythecom-
maundcmsnt of the Lord, and alfo faithfully pertormeth that which
is committed vnto him : howc jireat Hiamcfulnefle ihall it be , if any
man wanting both or cithcrof thcfe,ffiaU chalenge fuch honoi to
himfclt?But becaufe we haue abouc touched the nectffitic of exccu'
ting the office,nowe let vs entreate onely of the calling.
1 1 The difcourfc therot ft.mdeth in foure poinresrthat we fhould
knowe>what maner of minifters,iovv,and by whommimftcrs ouc,ht
to be inftitute, and with what vfagc or what Ceremonie they are to
be admitted. Ifpeakeofthc ourw.irde and folemneollmg, which
belongeth to publike order o^ the Church:as for that fecrete calling,
whereof cuery miniiler is priuy in his own confciece before God.Sc
KKK ij
Cap.3 . Or the outwardc mcancs
hath not the Church witneffc of it, I omitt it.It is a good witneflc of
our hart,that not by any ambition, nor couetoufncflc, nor any other
gredy dcfirc , but with pure fcarc of God and zclc to cdcfic to the
Church , we recciuc the office offered vnto vs. That in decde is (a»
Ihaue raycd)neceiraricforeucryoneofv$,ifwe will approuc otn*
minifterie allowable before God. Neuerthelcffe he is rightly called
in prcfence of the Church , that commeth vnto it with an cuill con-
fcience , fo that his wickedncs be not open. They are wont alfo to
(ay that euc priuatc men are called to y minifterie, whom they fee td
be mete and able to execute it : becaufc verily learning iojncd with
godlincflc and with the other quahties of a good Paftor,is a ccrtainc
preparation to the very office. For whom the Lorde hath appointed
to fo great an office, he firft furniflieth them with thofe armurcs
that are required to fulfill it , that ihey fhouldnot come empty and
.Cot. vnpVeparcd vnto it. Whereupon Paul alfo to the Corinthians,when
*«7' he meante to difputc of the very offices, firft rehearfedthe giftcs
which they ought to haue that execute the offices. But becaufe this
is the firft of thofe fower pointes that I haue propounded, let v$
nowe go forwarde vnto it. . ,>
'it.1.9. iz " What maner of Biilioppcs it is mete tochofofc , Paule dotli
■Tim. largely declare in two places,but the fummc commeth to this effed^
'^* thar none are to be chofenjbut they that are of founde doftrinc,and
of holy Iifc,& not notable in any vice, which might both take away
credite from chem,& procure flaimder to their miniftery.Of Deacos
and Elders there is altogether like confidcration. It is alway to be
looked vnto , chat they be not vnablc or vnfit to bcare the burden
that IS bycd vppon them , that is to fay , that they may be furnifhed
wirh thole powers that are neceflarie to the fulfillmg of their office*
uc.i ?. So when Chrift was about to fende his Apoftles, he garnifhed them
5. and vvith thofe weapons & inftrumcnts which they could not wantc. And
J'^^' Paule when he had painted out the image of a good & true Biihop,
5, * ' warneth Timothce,that he fhould not defile hinifelfe with choofing
i& i.i any man that differethfrom it. I referrc this word Howe, not to the
■'i'*m.5 ceremonie of choofing , but to the rcuerente feare that is to be kept
*• in the choofing. Hereupon come the faftings and prayers , which
Lukereciteth that the faithfuU yfed when they madePriefts. For
whereas they vndcrftoode that they mcdjed with a moft earned
matter , they durft attempt nothing , but with great reucrcnce and
carefulncfle.But they chefely applied themfelues to prayer$,whcre-
hy they might craue of God the Spirit of counfell and difcrction.
I J The third thing that we haue fet in our diuifio was*by whom
xniniftcrs
To Saliiation. Lib.4. 443
mmiftcrs arc to be chofcn.Of this thing no ccrtainc rule can be i;a-
thcrcdoutoftheinftitucion of Apolllcs, which had fome difference
from the common caUmg of the rcll. For, bccaufc it was an extraor-
dinary miniftcric , that it might be made difccrnablc by fome more
notable marke.it behoucd that they which ihould execute ir,lhould
be called and appointed byihe Lordcs owne mouth.They therefore
tooke in hande their doing,bcing furniflicd by no mans eledion,but
by the oncly commaundement of God and of Chrift. Hereupon ^5. r.
commeth that when the Apoltles would put an other in the place of ' ^'
ludaSjthey durft not certainly name any one man,but they brought
forth two , that the Lorde (houldc declare by lot, whether of them
he would haue to fucccde. After this mancr alfo it is mete to take
chiSjthat Paule denieth that he was creat Apoftle of men or by man, Oala.i
but by Chrift and God the father. That firft pointe, that is ro fay of * ^'
menjhe had common with all the Godly minilters of the worde. For
no man could rightly take vppon him that execution , but he that
were called of God. But the other point was proper and fmgular to •
himfelfe. Therefore when he glonethofthis,hedoth not onely
boft that he hath that which belongeth to a true and lawcfull Paftor,
but alfo bringcth foorth the fignes of his Apoftlelliip.For whe there
were fome among the Galathians , which trauailing to diminilh hit
authoritie, made him fome meanc difciple , put in office vndcr them
by the principall Apoftles : he,to defcnde in fafctie the dignine of his
preaching, which he kncwe to be fhot at by ihofc futtle deuifes,
needed to fhewe himfelfe in all pointes nothing inferior to the other
Apoftles . Therefore he affirmeth that he was chofen , not by the
iudgement of men.likc fome common Bifhop,but by the mouth and
manifeft Oracle of the Lorde himfelfe.
14 But no man that is fober will deny, that it is according to the
order of lawcfull calling, that Bifliops fliould be appointed by mem
forafmuch as there arc fo many teftimonies of y Scripture for profc
thereof.Ncither doth that faying of Paule make to the contrary ,as it Gal.x.
is faid, that he was not fent of men , nor by men : forafmuch as he
fpcaketh not there of the ordinary choofing of minifters , but cha-
lengeth to himfelfe that which was fpccial to the Apoftles. Howbcic
God alfo fo appointed Paule by himfelfe by fingular prerogatiue,
that in the meane time he vfed the difcipline of Ecdefiaftical callmg.
For Luke reporteth it thus , when the Apoftles were faftmg and
praymg,the Holy Ghoft faid:Separate vnto me Paule and Barnabas Aft.! j
to the worke to which I haue feuerally chofen them. To what pur- *•
pofe fcrucd that (cparacion and putting on of bandes , (ith the Holy
KKK iij
Cap.3. Of the outwardc mcancs
Gholt hath teftified his ownc elcdion , but that the difcipline of the
Church in appointing mimfters by mcHjmight be prcfcrucdrThcrc-
fore the Lord could by no pbiner example approuc fuch order,than
he did when hauing firll declared that he had ordained Paul Apoftle
for the Gent»les,ytft he willeth him to be appointed by the Church.
ft. !• Which thing we may fee in the choofin^ of Mathias. For, becaufc
i* the office of Apoftlclhip was of fo greate importance, that they durft
not by their ownc iudgement choofe any one man into that degrec>
they did fet two men in the middes , vpon the one of whom the lot
fhouJd falhchat fo both the clcciion might haue an open teftimonic
from heaucn , and yet the poiicie of the Church ihould not be paf-
fed oucr.
15^ .Nowe it isdemaundcd whether the minifter ought to be
chol'en of the whole ChurchjOr only of the other of the fame office,
and of the Elders that haue the rule of difcjphne,or whether he may
be mads by the authority of one man They that geue this authority
it. 1.5. to one man,allcge that which P^ule fayth to Titus:Thercfore I haue
lefte ch.ee in Creta , that thou Ihouldeft appointe in cuery townc
Tim- Prieftes. Againe to Timofheerlay not handes quickly vppon any man.
*** But they are deceiued if they thmk.that either TimotheeatEphcfus,
or Titus in Cicta > vfed a kingly power , that cither of them ihould
difpofe all things at his ownc will. For they were aboue the ieft,onIy
TO go before the people with good and hoKome counfells : not that
they onely,cxcluding all other,fhould do what they lifted. And that
I may not fcemeto faineany thing,! will make it plaine by a like
5; 14. example. For Luke rehearfeth that Paule .ind Barnabas appointed
i' Prietls in diuerfe Churchcs:but he alio cxpreflfeth y order or mancr
howe , when he fayeth that it was done by voices : ordeining Priefts
(faycth he) by hfting vp of handes in euery Church.Thcrefore they
two did creat thcmibut the whole multitude,a$ the Grecians mancr
was in ele<5lions, did by holdmg vp their handes declare whom chey
v/ould haue. Eucn in hke mancr the Romaine hiftories do oftetimes
fay ..that the Conful which kept the affemblicSjCreatcd ncwe officers,
for none other caufe but for that he rccciued the voices & gouerned
the people in the eleiftion.Truely it is not likely that Paule graunted
more toTimothceand Titusthanhc toke to himfelfe. But wcfce
that he was wonce to creat Billiops by voices of the peoplc.Thcrfore
the places abouc are lb to be vnderftanded,that they minifh nothing
of the comon right and libcrcic of the Church. Therefore Ciprian
fayeth well,when he affirmeth that it commeth from the authoririe
of God , that the Pricft Ihould be chofcn in prefcnce of the people
before
To Saluation. Lib.4. 444
before the eyes of all men, and (hould by publike iudgement and te-
ftimonie be allowed for worthy & mete. For we fee that this was by
the commaundemet of the LordeobfcruedintheLeuiticallPriefts, Leui.8.
chat before their cofecraiio they fhould be brought into the fight of ^•
the people. And no otherwife is Maihias added to tlic fellowlhip of ^ " ^ ^'
the Apoftles:and no otherwife the fcucn Deacons were created: but aSLi. '
the people fcing and allowing ic.Thcfe examples (fayeth Ciprian)do 1 5. and
(hewe , that the ordring of a Pricft ought not to be done , but in the '^•*«
knowledge of the people ftanding by : that the ordering may be iuft
and lawfulljwhich hath bene examined by the witnefie of all. We arc
therefore come thus farrc>that this is by the word of God a lawcfull
calling of a miniftcr , when they that fceme mete are created by the
f onfent and allowaunce of the people,And that other Paftors ought
to beare rule of the ele<5lion,that nothing be done amiflc of the mul-
titude either by lightnefTejOr by euill afFedions,or by diforder.
1 6 Now remaineth the forme of orderingjto which we aflignc^
the laft place in the caUing. It is euidenc that the Apoftlcs vfedno
other ceremonie,when they admitted any man to minifteiie.btjt the
laying on of handes. And I thinke that this vfage came from the
maner of the Hebrues , which did as it were prcfente vnro God by
laying on of handes that which they would haue blefll-d & hallowed.
So when lacob was about to blefle Ephraim and ManalTe , belayed ^«"*4l
his handes vpon their heds.Which thing our Lorde followed, when ^^^
he prayed ouer the infantes. In the fame meaning ( as I thinke) the ij.
Icwes,by the ordinace of the lawe,layed handes vpon the Sacrifices. Aa.15
Wherefore the Apoflles by laying on of handes did fignifie that they ^»
offered him to God,whom they admitted into the minifterie. Albeit
ihcy vfcd it alfo vppon them , to whom they applied the vifiblc gra-
ces of the Spirit . Howefoeuer it bee , this was the (blcmnc vfage, Co
ofte as they called any man to the minifterie of the Church. So they
confecrated Paftors and tcachers,and fo alfo Deacons. But althougn
there be no ccrtaine commaundement concerning the laying on of
handes , yet bccaufe we fee that it was continually vfed among the
Apoftlesjtheir fo diligent obfeiuinge of it ought to be to vs in ftcdc
of a commaundement. And truely it is profitable,that by fuch a fignc,
both the dignitic of the miniftery fhould be comendcd to the people,
and al(b chat he which is ordered fhould be admonifhed , that he is
not nowe at his own liberty,but made bonde to God & the Church,
Moreouer it ftiall not be avaine figne>ifit bereftorcd to the na-
tural! beginning of it. For if the Spirit of God , hath ordeined no-
thing in the Church iovainC|Wcix)uftihinkethat this Cercmomc,
KKK iiij
Cap4« Ot the outward mcancs
fith it proccdcd from him,is not vnprofitablc,fo chat it be not turned
into a fuperftitious abufe. Laft of all this is to be holden, that not the
whole multitude did lay their handes v^on the minifters , but the
Paftors oncly. Howbcit it is vncertaine whether many did alway lay
on their handes or no. But it is cuident that that was done m the
^a ^ . Deacons, in Paule and Barnabas, and a fc wc other. B ut Paule him-
^ * 3 felfc in an other place rcporteth, that he , and not many other , did
Tim. ^^y ^* handes vppon Timothce. I admoni^ thee (faycth he) thac
'tf, thou raife vp the grace which is in thee by laying on of my handes.
For, as for that which in the other Epiftle is Ipoken of the laying on
of the handes of the degree of Priefts, I do not fo take it, as though
Paule did fp'eake of the companie of the Elders , but I vndcrftandc
by that word the very ordinance it felfe : as if he had fayed; Make
that the Grace , which thou haft rcceiucd by laying on of handes
when I did crcat thee a pricft,may not be voidc.
I he 111), Cnapter.
of the fiat t of the olde Church, and of the m^ner of gouerning that VVM
in vfe before the Tapaiie.
HTthenowe haue intreatcd of chc order of gouerning the
Church, as it hath bene dcliuered vs out of the pure word
ofGodrand of the minitterics , as they were inftituteby
Chrift.Nowc that all thcfc things may be more clcrely and
familiarly opened,and alfo be better fattened in our mindesnt fhaibc
profitable in thcfe things to cofidcr the forme of the Olde Church,
which fhall reprclent to our eyes a ccrtaine iniage of Gods iniliiutio.
For although the Bifhops of thofc times did fct forth many Canons,
wherin they feemed to cxprefle more tlia was expreflcd in the holy
Scripture : yet they with fuch hcdefulnefle framed all their order
after the oocly rule of Gods word, that a man may ealily fee that in
this behalf they had inamaner nothing difagrcing from the word
of God. But although there might be fomcwhat wantingc in their
ordmances^yet becaufe they with finccre zeale endeuoured to prc-
feruc Gods inftituti6,& they fwarued not much fro it,it dial be very
profitable here Ihortely to gather what maner of obferuation ihcy
had. As we haue declared that there arc thre fortes of minifters co-
meded vnto vs m the Scripture:fo all the minifters y the olde Church
had,it diuided into thre Orders.For out of the order of Elders were
partly chofcn Paftors and Teachers : the reft of them had the rule
of theiudgementand corrcdionofmancrs. To the Deacons was
commitied the cace of the poorc,and die diftiibutipg of the almes.
As
To Saluation. Lib.4. 445
A$ for the Readers and Acoluch,werc not namci of ccrtainc offices:
but chote whom they called Clcrkc$,they trained from their ) outh
vpward m certame cxercifcs co feruc the Church, that they might be
y better vnderftandc to what purpofe they were appointed, d5( miq;ht
in time come y better prepared to their office:as I ilial byanciby (hew
more at large.ThercforcHievomCj when hchadappomtcd fiuc or- inpf^.
ders of the Church,rcckcncth vp Bi(hopSjPrieftcs,Deacon$,Beleucrs, cap.^.
and Cathecumcni : to the reft of the Clergy & monkcs he giucih no
proper place.
X Therefore to whom the office of teachinge was enioyned, all
them they named Pricftcs.Tn cuery city they chofe out of their own
number one man,to whom they fpecially gauc the title of BiHioppc:
that dilfcntions ihoulde not ^row of cqualiry,3S it is wont to come to
palTc. Yet the Bilhop was not To aboue the reft in honor and dignity,
y he had a dominion ouer his felowes.But what office y Conlul had
in the Senare,to propound of matterb,to askc opinions,togo before
the other with counrelling,momlhing and exhorting,to goucrne the
whole adion with his authority, and ro put in execution that which
is decreed by common counfclhthe fame office had the Bifhop in rhc
aflembly ot the Pncftes. And the olde wryrers thcmfclues confefTc,
that the fame was by Mens confent brought in for thcncceflTKy of
the times. 1 hcrcforc Hierome vpon the Epiftle to Titus faith : The
lame was a Pneft which was a Bifhop. And before that by the inftin-
^lon of the Deuill,therc were diflentions in rcligion,3nd it was faid
amonge peoples ; I am of Paule,I am of Cephas, Churches were go- M
ucrncd by common counfcll of Elders. Afterward, that the fecdes of
diflcnDons might be plockcci vppe,all the care was commuted to one
man. As thcrforc the Priefts do know, that by cuftome of the Church
they are fubicd to him that is fct ouer thcm:fo let the Biffiops know, '
that they are aboue the Priefts.rathcr by cuftome, than by the truth
of the Lordes difpofing,and that they ought to goueme the church
in common together. But in an other place he tcacheth,how aunci-
ent an inftitutio it was. For he fayth that at Alcxandria,from Marcke ^pi^^*
ihe Euangchft euen to Hcraclas and Dionyfius , the Prieftes did al- *^ *^"*'
way choofc out one of thcreluej,and fct him in a hycr dcgrcc,whom
they named a Bifhop.Thcrfore eucry city had a company of Prieftes
which were Paftors and Teachers . For they all did execute amonL-ic
the people that office of teaching, exhorting and correding, which
Paul appointcth to the Bifhops:and that they might leauc fccde af- Tit.i.f.
tcr thcm,they trauailcd in teaching the yon^^er men, that hadde pro-
fcflcd thcmfclues ibuldiours in the holy warfare, lo cuery city there
Cap4. Of the outward mcancs
Vf2ti appointed a certame counti cy , that ihould take their Prieftc«
from thence, and be accomptcd as it were into the body of that
Churcii. Euery company (a% I haue before rayd)only for preferuatio
of Policy and Peace,were vnder one Bilhop:which was fo aboue the
left in dignuy,that he was fubied to the affembly of his brethren. If
the compaflc of ground that was vnder his Bilhoprike were fo great,
that he coulde not fuffife to fcrue all the offices of a Bifhop in euery
place of it , in the countrey it felfe there were in certaine places ap "
pointed Prieftes which in fmall matters (hould execute his authori^
ty.Them they called countreybifhops,bccaufc in the countrey they
rcprclented the Bilhop.
5 But,fo much as belongeth to the office,whcrof we now fpeake,
as well the Bilhops as the Prieftes were bound to apply the diftribu-
ting of the word and Sacramcntes. For it was ordained only at Alc-
E ifto xandria,(bccaufc Arrius had there troubled the Church)y the prieft
ki tnl ihould not preach to the people,as Socrates fayth in the 9.booke of
ihc Tripartite hiftory.Which yet Hicrome confeflTeth that he mifii-
kcth not.Trucly it (hould be counted monftruous,if any man had gi-
ocn out himfelfe for a Bifhop, that had not alfo in very dede (hewed
himfelfe a true Bi(hop.Therefore fuch was y feuerity of thofe times,
that all miniftcrs weredriuen to the fulfillinge of fuch office, as the
Lordrequireth of the. Neither do 1 rehearfe the maner of one age
aIonc:For cuen in Gregorics time, when the Church was now almoft
dccaied(certainely it was much degenerate from the auncicnt pure-
»es ) it had not bin tolerable that any Bilhop (houlde abftaine from
Epi.4 prcaching.The Prieft(fayth he in one place) dicth if there be no foud
Homcl. jj^jrd of him: bccaufe he asketh againft himfelfe the wrath of the fc-'
Ad'io. crcteiudge,ifhego without founde of preachinge. And in an other
i6» placc:Whcn Paule teftifieth that he is clcane from the bloud of alhin
this faying we be conuinced,we be bounde,we be (hewed to be gilty»
which are called Prieftes, which belide the euils that we haue of ouf
ownc,addc alfo the deathes of other : becaufe we kill fomany as wc
beinge luke warme and (ilent do daily fee to go to death . He calleth
himfelfe & other (ilent,becaufe they were leflc diliget in their workc
than they ought to be.When he fpareth not them,that did halfe per-
forme their duety.'what thinke you he would haue donejif a man had
altogether (itte idle ? Therefore this was a great while holden in the
Churchjthat the chiefe duty of the Bifhop was to fccde Gods people
with the word , or both pubhkely and priuately coediHe the Church
with found dodrine.
4 But whereas cucry prouince haddc among their Bi(hoppes one
A^chcbj-
To Salu-^tion. Lib.4. 44^
Archebi{hop:alfo where in the Niccnc Synodc there were ord>Hr»ed
P.unarchcs,which Ihouldc in degree & dignity bcabouc the Arch-
biflwps, that pertained to the prefcruinge of difcipline.Howcbeit la
this difcourfe , that which was moft rarely vfcd may not be omitted.
For this caufc therfore chiefely thefe degrees were ordained, that i£
any thingc hapncd in any Churchythat could not well be ended by a
fcwc, might be referred to a prouinciall Synode. If the greatncflc or
difficulty of the matter required a greater difculfingCjthe Patriarchef
were alio called to it with the Synodes,fro whom there might be no
appcllc but to a General Councei.The gouernment fo ordered ma-
ny called a Hierarchie, by a name (as I thinkc) vnproper,and iru;:ly
vnufed in the Scriptures . For the holy Ghcft willed to prouide, that
no ma fhould drcame of a principality or dominion whe the gouern-
ment of the Church is fpokcn of. But if, Icaumge the word wc lookc
vpon the thing,wc (ballfinde that the old Biibops ment to forge no
forme of ruling the Church, difl'ering from that which the Lord ap-
pointed by his word.
5 Neither was the order of the Deacons at that time any other
thenitwas vndcnhe Apoftlcs. For they rcceiucd the daily ofTringes
of the Faithfull, and the yearcly reuenues of the Church, to befiowc
them vponrruc vfcs, that is to fayjto diftribute the to fede partly the
mini(lcrs,& parteJy the poore:but by the appointment of the Bilhop,
to whomc alfo they yearcly rendred accomptcs of their diftnbution.
For whereas the Canons do eucry where make the Bifhop diftribu-
tcr of all the goods of the Church, it is not fo to be vnderftanded,a$
though he did by himfclfe difchargc that care:but becaufe it was his
part to appoint to the Deacon,who fhould be receiued into the com-
mon almes of the Church,and of that which rcmaincd,to whome it
fhould be giuen, & how much to eucry onc:bccaufc he had an ouer-
{ceing whether the Deacon did faithfully execute that which beloged
to his office. For thus it is red in the canons which they afcribc to the
Apoflles:Wc commaunde that the Bifhoppe haue the goodes of the
Church in his owne power . For if he be put in truft with the foulcf
of mcH,which arc more prccious,much more it is meetc that he haue
charge of money : fo that by his power all thinges may be diftribu-
tcd to the poore by the Elders and Deacons: that they may be mini-
ftred with all fcare and carefulncife. And in the Councel of Antioche Cap.jj
it is decreed, that the Bifhops fhoulde be reftrained that meddle with
the goodes of the Church, without the knowledge of the Elders and
Deacons. But of that point wc needc to make no longer difpurarion,
£th It IS euident by many cpiftics of Grcgoric^that cuen at that tune.
Cap.4. Of the outward mcancs
when othcrwifc the ordinances of the Church were much corrupted,
yet this obferuation continued, that the Deacons fliouldc vnder the
Bifhop be the ficwardcs of the poore. As for Subdcacons, it is likely
y at the beginning they were ioyned to the Deacos.that they (hould
yfc their feruice about the poore:but that difference was by litle and
litle confounded. But Archdeacons began then to be created, when
the plenty of the goods, required a new and morecxadt maner ofdi-
Epi.ad fpofing them: Albeit Hieromc doth fay, that it was cuen in his agc.In
Ncpot. their charge was the fumme of their reucnues, pofleflions,and ftore,
BpiU.io and the colledion of the daily offcringes. Whereupon Gregory dc-
"^''* clartth to the Archdeacon of Salon, that he fliouldc be holdcn gilty
if any of the goodcs of y Church perifhcd either by his fraud or nc-
ghgencc.But whereas it was giuen to them to rcadc the Gofpcl to the
people,and to exhort them to prayer : and whereas they were admiN
ted to deliuer the Cuppe in the holy Suppcr,that was rather done to
garnifh their office, that they fliouldc execute it with the more reuc^
rcnce , whe by fuch fignes they were admoniflicd that it was no pro^
phane bailiwike that chey exercifed , but a fpirituall fun(^ion and de-
dicate to God.
6 Hereby alio we may iudgc what vfc there was, and what maner
of diftribution of the Church goods.Ech where both in the decrees ot
the Synodc$,and among the old wrytcrs it is to be found> that what-
(beuer the Church poflcflcth either in landcs or in moncy,is the pa-
trimony of the poore. Therefore oftentimes there this fong is fungc
to the Bifliops and Deacons , that they fliouldc remember ,that ihcy
medic not with their ownc goodes , but the goodcs appointed to the
neccffity of the poore ; which if they vnfaithfully fupprefle or waft,
ihcy flialbc gilty of bloud. Whereby they are admoniihcdjWith great
fearc & rcucrence, as in the fight of God,without refped of pcrfons,
to diftribute them to whom they be due. Hereupon alfo come thofe
grauc proteftations in Chryfottomc,Ambrofe, Auguftinc,and other
like Biflioppcs, whereby they affirme their ownc vprightncfle to the
people.But fithit is equity, and eftabliflied by the law of the Lorde,
that they which employ their feruice to the Church , fliouldc be fed
with the common charges of the Church, and alfo many Pricftes in
that agCjConfccrating their patrimonies to God,were willingly made
poore : the diftributingc was fuch , that neither the minifters wanted
(uftcnancc,nor the poore were neglc6ed.But yet in the meane time
it was prouided , that the minifters themfelues , which ought to giue
exaplc of honeft fparing to other, ftiould not hauc fo much, whcrby
they might abufe ic to riocous cxce^e or delicioufnes,bu( only wherVt
wi?b
To Saluation. Lib.4. 447
with to fuftainc their ownc ncdc.For thofc of the Clcrgy(rayth Hic-
rome)which arc able to hue of the goods of their parents,if they take
that which is the poores,do commit facrilegc, & by fuch abufc they
cate and drinkc to tbemfelues damnation.
7 Firlt the minittration was free and voluntary , whereas the Bi-
fl)ops and Deacons were of their owne wil faithfull,and vprightnefle
of conlcience and innocence of life were to them in ftcde of lawcs.
Afccrwaide when euiU examples grcwe of the gredineflc or perucrfc
tftcdions of fomc , to corrc^ thofe faultes , the canons were made,
which diuided thereucnues of the Church into foure partcs:of which
they affigned one part to the of the Clergy, the fecond to the poorc,
the third to the maintenance and reparation of Churches,and other
ho]y buildingeSjthe fourth to the poorc as well ftraungcrs as of their
ownc countrey .For whereas the other canons, giue this laft parte to
the Bifliop,that varicth nothing fro my aboucfaid diuifion. For they'
meanc not that that part (hould be his owne,that either he himfelfc
alone (houlde deuourc it,or poure it out,vpon whom or what he lift,
but that it fliould fuffice to maintaine the Hofpitality which Paul re-
quiretb ofthat order. And fo do Gelafius & Gregory expound it.For l" '™*^
Gclafius bringcth no other reafon why the Biihop fhould chalengc
any thinge to himfelfc , but that he might giue it prifoners and ftran*
gers. And Gregory fpeaketh yet more plainely. It is the moncr(rayth
he)of the fea Apoltolike,to giue comaundement to the Bifhop when
he is ordrcdjthat of all the reuenue that arifeth,th ere be made foure
portions : that is to fay,the one to the Bifhop and his ramily for Ho-
fpitality,& entcrtainmcntrthe fecond to the Clergyrthc third to the
poorc. the fourth to the repairing of Churches. Therfore it was law-
ful! for the Bifhoppc to take nothing to his ownc vfe, but fo much at
were enough for moderate & meanc foode and clothing. If any be*
gan to excede.eithcr in riotous expen(e,or in oftentation and pomp,
he was byandby reprcffcd by his fclowes , & if he obeyed not, he was
put from his dignity.
- 8 As for that which they beftowed vppon garnilhinge of holy
thinges,at the firft it was very litle. Afterward when the Church be-
came fomwhat richcr,yet in that bchalfe they ftil kept a mcane. And
yecall the money that was beftowed therupon,rcmained fafe for the
poore.if any greater neceftity happened. So when famine pofTcfled Trfpw.
the Prouince of Hierufalcm,and the ncde could not otherwife be re- hill li. j
Jieucd.Cyrillus folde the vcftcls and garmcntes.and fpent them vpon ^ '^ ' *'
fuftcnancc of the poorc. Likewife Acarios Bifhop of Amida, when a ^*^* * *
great multitude of the Pcrfians,in a mancr ftarued for hunger, called
Cap.4. Of the outwardmeancs
together the Clergy , and when he had made that notable oration^
Our God necdcth neither difhes nor cuppes,hecaufe he neiriitr ca^
tcth nor drinkcthjhe molt the vcireb,tomakc thereof boihmeatc
AA Ne & ranfome Tor me in mifcry. Hierom alfojwhen he inueyeth agamft
poua. jj^g jQ much gorgioufncs of tcmplcs^doth with honor make mcntiS
of Exuperius Bi.'hop ofThoIofa m his time, which cariedtbc Lords
body in a wicker basket,andhis bloud m glaffcybutluffirednapuorc
ma to be hungry. That which I euen now fay J of AcatiuSjAmbrotc
lib. de rchearfcth of himfelfc.For when the Arrians charged him.for ^ he
«ffic. had broken y holy veflcls to ranfom prifoncrSjhc vfcd this moft god-
cap.i8. jy excuferHe that lent y Apoftlcs without go]de,gathered Churches
togechei without gold. The Church hath gold,not to kepc it,but to
bcftow it,& to giuc relicfe in neccffitics.What neede is to kepc thai
which helpeth not.^Do wc not know.how much golde and (iluer the
Aflyrians tookc out of the temple of the Lord ? Doth not the Prieft
better to melt them for the fuftenancc of the poore, if other rcliefcs
do failcjthan an enemy a robber of God to bcarc them away ? Will
not the Lord ray:Why haft thou fufFred (bmany ncdy to dre for hur^-
gcr ? & verily thou hadft gold whereof thou mightcft haue miniftrcd
them fuftcnancc.Why were fo many led away captiue, & not ranfo<-
med ? why were fo many flainc by the enemy? It had bin better that
thou fhouldcft faue the vcffels of liuingc men, than of mctallcs. To
thefe thinges thou (halt not be able to aunfwcrc. For what wouldeft
thou fay?I feared leaft Gods teple fhould want garnifhing.Hc would
anfwerc:Sacraments require not goldrneither do thofe things pleafc
Hb.5.e- with golde that arc not bought with goldc.The ranfoming of prifo*-
piit.ji. ncrs isa garnilhin;; of Sacraments. In fummc, we fee that it is moft
* 33- true which the f^me man faycth in an other place , that whatfocusr
the Church thepoflcfled wastheftoreofthenedy.AgaineuhataBi-
fhop hath nothing that is not the poores.
9 Thefe that wc haue rehcarfed were the minifteries of the Old
Church . For the other of which the Ecclefiafticall wryters make
mention, were rather certaine cxercifcs and preparations, than ap-
' pointed offices . For thofe holy men , that they might leauc a ftore
for the Church after them,receiued into their charge, gouernancc
& difciphne, yong men which with the confent & authority of their
parenteSjprofcfled thcmfelues fbuldiours of the fpirituall warfare : flc
they fo framed them from their teder age, that they fhould not come
vnskjlful & raw to the executing of their office.But all they that were
inftruded with fuch beginnings,were called Clerkes.I would in dedc
(hat Tome other proper name haddc rather bin giucnthcm.For this
name
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 44.8
name grew of crrour, or of corrupt affcdioiforafmuch as Peter cal- ».P«fcf»
Icth the whole Church the C!ergy,that is to fay.thc Lordes inhcri- J*
tancc . But the inftitution it feUc was very holy and proHtable , that
they which woulde contecraic thcnrifclucs and iheir fcruicc to the
Churchjlhold be fo brought vp vnder the kCping of the Bilhopjtliac
none (hould minifter to the Chui ch,bui he that were well informed
aforehande, and that had from his very youth both fucked holy do-
^rine,and by feuerc difcipline put in a certaine continuing quality of
grauity & holy life,& were cftranged from worldly cares»& were ac-
cuftomed to Ipintual cares and iKidiesBut as yong fouldiours are by
certaine countcrfaitskirmiOies inltrudcdtolearnc true and earncft
fightjfo there were alio certaine rudimcntes, whereby they were ex-
ercilcd while they were Clerkes , before that they were promotW to
the very offices. Therefore hrft they committed to the Clerkes the
charge Co open and (hut the Church,and they named them Oiiiarij*
dorekepers. Afterward they called them Acoluthi, folowcrs, which
waited vpon the Bifhop in his houihold fcruices, and did contmuailjr
accompany him,firft for honors fake,& then that no fufpition fbouUl
arife of them.Morouer y by Utle & litlc they might become knowcn
to the people, and get to ihemfclues commendation : alfo that they
might Icarne to abide the fight of all men,& to fpeake before al men:
that being made Prieftes.whcn they came forth to teach,ihey fhould
not be abafhed with {hamc:therfore place was appointed the to read
in the pulpct . After this roaner they were promoted by degrees , to
fhew proofe euery one of their diligece in all their fcuerall exercifes,
till they were made Subdeacons.Tbis only is my mcaning,that thofe
were rather groffe beginnings , than fuch offices as were accompted *
among the true miniftenes of the Church.
10 Wheras we faidy the firft & feconc) point in the calling of mi-
nifters,are,what maner of men they ouglit to choofc, & bow great a
religious carefulnes they ought to vfe in thatmatter:therin the old
Church harh folowed the prefcribed order of Paul, & the examples
of the ApoftleSjFor they were wot to come together to choofe y pa-
ftors with moft great rcuercncc,& c^rtfull callinge vpon the name of
God.Befide this they had a forme of ex3mination,wherby they tried
the life & dodrinc of the that were to be chofen by that rule of PauL
Only they fom what offended herein with too great feueritv^becau^c
they would require more in a Bifhop than Paule requjred,& fpccially ^ ^
in proceffe of time they require, i vnmaried life. But in y other points ».
their obferuation was agf ein^ -, with Paules defcription. But in this
which we made the third poinc,that is to fay^who ought to inliuutc
Cap4. Of the outward mcancs
mimrtcrs,thcy kept not aJway one order. In olde timc,none was rc^
cciuedintothc company of Clcrkcs without the confent of all the
lib 1. pcoplcrinfomuch that Cyprian la borcth earncftly to cxcufe that he
«pift, 5. appointtd one Aurehus to be a Reader without asking aduife of the
Church.bccaufe that was done befidc the cuftome,though not with-
out rcafon.For this he fayth bcforc.In ordering of Clerkcs,derc brc-
ihrcn,wc are wont firft to aske you aduife, and by common counfeil
to wey the maners and deferuings of eucry one. But bccaufc in thefe
Icflcr exercifes there was not much pcrilrbccaufc they were chofcn
to a longe proofe, and not to a great office, therefore the confent of
the people therin ceffcd to be asked. Afterward in the other degrees
al(o,exccpt the Bilhoprike, the people commonly left the iudgcmct
andfhoifc of them to the Bifhop and the PricftcSjthat they fhoulde
examine who were mecte and worthy : fauinp.e peraducnture when
new Prieftes were appointed for parochcs : for then it behoued that
the multitude of that place namely (hould confent. Neither is it any
maru<\ill,that the people in this behalfc was litie careful! in keepingc
their owne right : For no man was made a Subdeacon , that had not
fhcwed a longe proofe of himfelfe in his bein^e a Gierke, vnder that
fcucrity of difcipline, which then was vfed. After that he haddc bin
tried in that df grce,he was made a Deacon. From chenfe he came to
thchonorof priefthoodcifhc hadbchaued himfelfe faithfully. So no
man was promoted,of whom there had not bin in decde a triall had
mriny ycares before the eics of the people. And there were many ca-
nos to puniih their faultes: fo that the Church could not be troubled
with cuil Prieftes or Deacons,vnIes it ncgledcd the remedies. How-
beit in the Prieftes alfo there was alway required the cofent of them
of the fame cityrwhich the very firft canon teftifieth in the <>7.diftin«
^ion, which is fathered vpon Anadctus . Finally all the admiftions
into orders were therefore done at ccrtaine appointed times of the
ycare,thatno man fliould priuily crepe in without the confent of the
faithfull , or Ihoulde with too much ealincffe be promoted without
witncfTes.
II In choofing of Bifhops the people had the liberty longe pre-
ferucd , that none {houlde be thruft in that were not accepted of all.
This therefore was forbidden in the counfeil at Antiochc,that none
fhoulde be thruft in to them againft their will. Which thinge alfo
lpj.90. Leo the firft doth diligently confirme.Hereupon came thefe fayings:
*^P' *• Let him be chofen,whom the Clergy, and the people,or the greater
number (hall require. Againe:Let him that ftiall bearc rule oucr al,be
choicn of alLFor it muft necdcs bc,that he that is made a ruler being
vnknowca
^ To Saluation, Lib.4. 44^
vnkowcnand not examined, is tbruft in by violence- Againc, Lcctc
him be chofcn » that is both chofcn by the Clerkcs , and defired by
the pcoplc:& let him be confecratc by thctn of that Prouince, widi
the iudgemcnt of the Mctropohtane . The holy Fathers looke fo
great heede that thii liberty ot the people lliould by no meane be di-
miniflied, t\ut wi^cinhc gt ncr.ill Synodc j^athcred together at Con-
ftantinoplc did order Ncdanu>ithey would not do it without the al-
lowance of the whole Clergy & pcople,as they tefljfied by their cpi-
file to the Synodc at Rome.Therfore when any Bifhcp did appoint a.
fucceflbr tohimlelfcjit was not oihcrwife ftablirned,vnlcs the whole
people did conHrmc it. Wlicreof you haue not ontly an examplc,but
alfo the very torme in Auc^nltme in y naming of Eiadius. AndThe-. z.^'"'*
odoritc,vvhen he reherieth that Peter was named by Athanafiuj; to n .
be his fucccffourybyaniiby addeth, tliat the order of prieftes confii- cap.ao.
med It, & the magi(irate,3nd nobihty,& the people approued^t wiib
their allowing ilaowte.
11 I graunt in dc6c that this alfo was by very good reafon ftabli-
flied in the Councel.l at Laodicea, th;}t the Eledion fhould noi be left
10 multitude^ . F Of It fcarc( ly happcnecb at any time , that (o many "P* ' ^
heades (hould wei order any thing with one mcaning:and common,-
\y this is true, that the vncertamc communaky is diuidedinio con-
trary affe<ftions.But foi this pt ril there was vfed a very good remedy,
For-firft the Clcrkes onely did choofc : whom they had chofen they
prefenicd to the Magiftrate ,ortQ the Senate andchiefemcnof the
people. Thcv, after confultation hadde , if they thought the eledion
goodjConfirmed )t:if not.they did choofe an other, whome they did
rather allow. Then the matter was mowed to the multitude,which al-
though they were not bound to thofe fore iudgemences,yet thereby
they could the Icflc be difordcred.Or if they began at the multitude:
that was dune onely to Icaine whom they did chiefly defire. When
the defircs of the people were heard,thc they of y Clergy did choofc
him. Soneither was It bwfull for the Clergy to appoint whom they
lifted , neither were i hey bounde to obey the focliftic defires of the
pcople.Leo appointcth this order in an other place, when hefayth:
There are to be looked for, both the deiires of the citizens, the peo- p.pift
pies teftimonies, the iudgement of the honorable, & the eledion of 87,
the clcrkes. Ai:ainc,Let there be holden the tcftimony of the hono-
rable, the fubfcrjption of the clerkcs,the confcnt of the order & c6'
munalty. No reafon(f3yth he)fuffreth it to be otherwifc done. And
nothingc clfc mcancth y decree of the Synode at Laodicca,but that
the cicrgy.&chicfcof thepeople,fliould notfufFer rhemfcluestobc
LLL
Q.
Cajp4. Ojfthcoittwardmcaries
called away by the vndifcrete multitude ; but rathcrthal With thcif
vvifdom & grauity they fhould reprclTc the peoples foolini affcdions,'
if ar any time nede (bould fo require. j
' 1 f This order of choofing was yet in force in the time of Grcgo-J
ry :& it is hkcly that tt endured long after.Thcrc rcmamc many Epi-
ftfes of hiSjthat giueeuidcnt tcrtimony of this matter. For fo oft as he
hath to do with the creating of any new Biihop, he vfcth to wryte to
the clergy.to the ordcrj& to the people,& romtirae alfotothc ruler^
according as the gouernment of the city is appointed.But if by rea-
fbn of the difordcred ftate of the Church,he camittech to any Biihop'
adioyninge, the charge of ottcrfceinge in the eicdion, yet he alway
requfrcth a folemnc decree ftregthened with the fubfcriptions of alL
lb a. Yea and when there was one Conftantius create Bifliop at Milainey
]^u6^. jnd that maay of the MiJlaneis were by reafonof the inmiion of the
barbaf6t« nations fled to Genua; he thooght thatihc eledion could
nototherwife be lawful,vnlefle they alfo were called together & gauc?
their alfent . Yea there arc not yet fiue hundred ye^es paft , fincc
►iftiu. r*ope Nicolas decreed thus of the ele^ion of the Biftiop of Rome?
3 op. that the Cardinal! Bifhepsfhoulde bcginne , ehert that they fliouldc
n no- ioync t© them the reft of the clergy jlaft of all that the elcdion ihould
»i"c. [)t confirmed by the confent of the people. And in the endc he reci-
teih that decree of Leo,which I euen now alleaged,& commaundeth
h from thenfe fobrth to be in force . But if the mahi:e of wicked
men Ihall To preuaile,that thcclerkcs to make a true tie^idrl be com*<
j>elled to depart out of the city: yet he eommaudcth thai P>me of the
people be prefent with them, As for the Emperoups confcnt/o fatrc
as I can pcrceiue, was required only in two Churches^ that is, Rom e
a/id Conftantinopleibecaufe there were the twofcatcs of the Empire.
For whereas Ambrofe was fent to Milaine with a power from Vaien-
, tinian to goucrne the elcdion of the newBifhop; that was extraor-
dinarily done, by rcfon of gridubus fadions wherewith the citizens
then boyled among themfelues. But at Rome in old time the Empc-
rours authority was of fo great fbi-ce in creatinge of the Btfhop , thae
!pift.5. Gregory fayeth ,thathe was fctby hiscommaundemcnt in the go-
^'^* ucrnmentoftheChurch:whenyctby folemne vfagt hcwasdefired
by the people.This wias the maner,that whc the clergy & the people
had appointed any biflvopjthe clergy fhould forthwith moue it to ihc
Empcrourjthat he (hould cither by his allowance confirme the cle-
ftiottjOr by difalowance vndo it.Neither are the decrees that Gratian
garhereth togethcr,repugnam to this cuftomc : wherein is nothingc
ciTc faydibu( ihs^ it is in no wife Co be fu^cd ^ that cakingc ^way the
cano«
To Saluation* Lib.4. 450
dnonifall clci^bony a kinge Uioulde appoint a Bilhop after his ownc
luii& tliat the Mriropohtan lliou'dcoiecratc none that wcrcfopTo-
irtotedbv violcnf powers: Font is one thnigc lofpoylc the Church
of >>«• right, ihjt all iho.jLl be transfer! ctj to the luit ofouc m.m.afid
af» 6therihin.;c lograunt this honor ton kinpe oranErnperour,that
by his authority he m,iv confinnc a lawtull cledion.
14 Now It tollovtcth, that we enrreatc, with what forme tlic mi-
niUcrs of the Church were admitted into their office after eledion:
8JH5 the Latmcs cslleJ Qrdmaiio or Confccration : the Grckcs hauc
earlled it ChciroroniajiUinge vp of handcs.and lometimc alfo Chci-
rotheiia,Iayingon Oi h-inues. I-fowbcit Chcnotoma is properly cal-
led th.it kindc of eledio, wiicre mens t onfcntcs are declared by hol-
ding vp ot their hands. There fcmamcth a decree of the Niccnc coij-
celjtbat the Mctropolitane lliotild mere together with aithc BTilhops
of the proujnce to order him whjfch is cliofcn.Uut if lomc of them bt-
feindercd cither by h'ni^th of j^ way, or by Hckcncs.qr by any netcdi-i!
iy,chat yec three dt the leatl iliould mete : and that they that arc ab-
sent (houlde by letters tclhfie their coaitnt. And this Canoniwhcn
vvith difcontinuiiccit |>rcw our of vie, was afterward renucd with ma-
ny Synodes. But all, or atleaft as many as had no excule,were there-
fore comaundcdjo bc.prclentjthat tht y might haue the grauer niall
of the learnmse and mancis , ot him that was to be ordered : for tiie
matter wa* not done without mall . Anditappearcth by Ciprians
words, that in t'nc old time they were wont not to be called after the
election, but to be prci'ent at the eledionrand to this ende that they
{hould be as it were i:oucrnours,that nothing fhould be troublefomly
done in the muhirude. For where he fayd chat f he people haue po«
wcr cither to ciiooic worthy Pricftes,or toicfufcvnworthy,within a
litle after headd- th: Wherefore accordmge to the tradition of God g (^
& of tiic ApoftleSjit IS to be diligently kept and holden (which is yet iib.i.
holden with vs alfo & in a maner throughout all prouinccs) that for
jhc light celebration of orderings, all the Bilhops adioyninge of the
fame prouince fhould come together to that people for which a go-
ucmour is ordered, and that the Bifliop be chofcn hi prcfencc of the
people. But when they' were fomtimc flowly gathered together,and
iheie was peril Icaftfomc would abufc that delay to occafion of am-
bitious fuing:it was thought that it fhould be enough if after the ele-
dion made, they lliould mete and after allowance vpon lawfull exa-
mination confecratc him.
1 1,5 When this was ech where done without exception, by litle 8c
litle a diucrfe mancr grew in vfejthat they which were choft fhouli
i.ji /.' I- L L ij
Cap.5« Of the outward meancs
reforte ro the Mctropolitanc city to fetchc their ordcringc. Whichf
came to palTe rather by ambition, and by deprauation of the firft irt-
ftitucion,than by any good reafon. And not long aftetiWhcn the au-
thority of the feae of Rome was now cncreafcd^thcrc came itt place
yet a worfe cuftome , that the Btllioppes almoft of aU Italy fhoiildc
fetche their confccration from thente .Which we may note out of
. .^ the Epiftlcs of Gregoric. Onely a fe we ciiiesywhrch 6id not fo-eafi-
Epi 69 ^y b'"^ place, haddc their aunciem right preferuedras there is an ex-
^6, * amplchadofMillaine.Paraducnturc the onefy Mctropolitanc cities
kept their priailcdgc^ For aU the Bidioppesof the Prouincc were
wont to come together to the chiefe citie to confecrate the Archc-
bifhoppe. But the Ccrcmonie was laying on of handes. For I rcadc
of no other Ceremonies vfed : fauinge that in the folemne affem-
bly the Bjlliops hadaccttaine appareli whereby they might bedi-
ftindly knowen from other PricftcS , They ordered alfo Pneftes and
Deacons with onely layinge on of handes . But cuery Bifhoppe with
the company of Priefts ordered his owne Prfeftes.But although they
did all the fame thing:yet becaufe the Bifhop went before,and it was
all done as it were by his guidinge,therefore the ord;eving was called
his.Whereupon the old writers haue oft this fayingrthat a Prieft dif-
fereth from a Billiop in noother thingc,butbccaulc he hath not ihe^
power of ordering, ,
The V Chapter.
That the elde forme ofgotternmtnt u vtterly ouerthrtvven
bj the tyranny of the Tafacy,
•Ow it is go5d to fet before mcs eies the order of gouerning
the Church , that the feaeof Rome and all the champions
thereof do kepe at this day, & the whole image of that Hie-
rarchic which they continually hauc in their mouth,and to
compare it with that order of the firft & old Church which we haue
defcribed:y by the coparifon it may appearc what maner of Church
they hauc,which vfe this only title to charge or rather to oucrwhelm
vs. But it is beft to begin atCaHinge,that we fee both who, and what
maner of me,and by what order they be called to this miniftery. And
then afterward we (halconfider how faithfully rhey execute thcirof-
fice.We will giue the firft place toBifiiops: to whom I would to God
this might be an honor, to haue y firft place in this difcourfc But the
matter It fclfc doth not fuftermc , ones to touch this thing be it nc-
uer fo lightly, without their great (hame. And yet I will rcmembcfjin
what kindc of wryting I am now occupied:& will not fufler iwy ralkc,
wiiich
ToSaluation. Lib.4, 451
which ought to be framed onely to fimple dodtrine, to flow abroade
bcyonde due boudcs.Bur kt Tome one of ihcm that hauc not vttcrly
loft all (hame, annlweicme, what mancrofbidioppes arcattliisday
coraoionly chofcn. Ti uely it is now growen too much out of vfe,to
hauc any examinatio had of their learninge : but if there be had any
refped ofiearning, they choofe fomc lawyer that an rather brawlc
in a courtjthan preach m a Church. This is certainejthat thefe hun-
dred yeares there hath fcarccly bin eucry hundrcth man chofcn ihac
vndei ftoodc any thing of holy dodrine. 1 do not therefore fpare the
former ages, for y they were much bttter,but becaufe wehauenow
only the prtfent Church in qucftiolf ludgemcnt be had of their ma-
nerSjWc flAall Hnde that there hauc bin few or almoft none,whom the
olde Canons wouldc not hauc iud^ed vnworthy . He that was not a
dronkard was a whoremongenhe that was alfo cleane from this wic-
kcdncfl"c,was cither a dycer,or a hunter,or dilTolute in fome parte of
his life. For there be hghrer faultes, which by the olde Canons do CX'
clode a man fro being a hifliop.But this is a moft great abfurdityjV ve-
ry children fcarccly ten yeares olde , arc by the Popes graunt made
bifhops.They are growen to fuch rtiamelefncs, and fenfelcfle dulnes,
that they dreaded not that extreme yea & monltruous wicked doing,
which is vtterly abhorring from the very fenfc of nature. Hereby ap-
pcareth howe religious their clcdions were , where the negligence
wasfocarclcflc.
z Now in cle<ftion,all that right of the people is take away. Their
defiringSitheir aflentings, their fubfcribings, and all fuch thingcs are
vanifhed:the whole power is transferred to the Canons oncly. They
bcftowe the bifhopnke vpon whom they will, and afterwarde bringe
him forth into the fight of y people, but to be worfiiippcd, not to be
examined. But Leo crieth on the other fide, that no reafon fuflfrcth it,
and he pronounceih that it is a violent impofition.Ciprian,when he
teftjfieili that itproce.cdeth from the law of God that it (houldnotbc
done but by the conixm of the people, fhewcih that the cotrary ma-
Tier is repugnac to the word of God.The decrees offo many Synodes
do moll feucrely forbid it to be otherwife done : & if it be done,thcy
commaunde it to be voide.If thefe thinges be truc,there now remai-
lieth in y Papacy no Canonical cle^ion,neither by Gods law nor by
the Eccleliaftical law.But although there were no other euil,yet how
fiiaj they be able to excpfe this that they hauc fo fpoylcd the Church
of her right ? But(fay they) the corruption of times fo required, thac
becaufe in appointinge of bifhops , hatreds and aftcdions more prc-
uaiUd with the people and the Magidratcs , than right and (ounde
».v LLL iij
Cap.5. • -Of the outward meanis
iudgementjtherfore the rule thereof flio'uldl be giuen to a few. Ad-
mit verily that thts were the extreme remedy of a mifchiefe in de-
fpeiied caic.But fith the mcdecine it felFe h^th appeared more hurt--
full than the very dircafe,why is not tins new euil alfo remedied?BuP
(fiiy thi-y)ic is cxadiy prckribed to the Cnnons,wbvit they ought to
folovv in che cledion.But do We douC;hut that the people m old tinitf
did vndei ftand chat they were bound to moft holy lnwcs,when they
faw that they had a rule let the by tijc word of God, when they came
together to choofe a bifhop?For that only voyce of God,whcrby he
defcribcth the true Image of a b!lliop,ou£;ht worthily to be of more
value than fufinit thoufandes of Canons. But neuerthelcflc the peo-
ple,corrupted with a moft euill aflfedionjhad no regard of the lawc
or of equity.So at this day though there be very good lawcs written
yet they remaine buried in papers. Yet for. the n^o{\ part it is vfcd in
mens manerSjVea and alowcd as though it v/e re done by good rcafon,
th.u dronkard«,whoiemDngers,dycers,arGcommonly promoted to
this honor: (it is butlitle that I ray)that buhoprjkesarcthe rewardes
of adulteries And bawdcries . For when they arc giucn but to hun-
ters dnd falconerSjii is to be thought to be gaily well bcfto'vcd- Any
way tocxcufe fohaynous indignity, it is too much wicked, f hcpco-i
pte (fay I) had m olde time a very ^ood Canon to v/hom Gods word
prefcnbed , that a bilTioppc ought to be vnreprou;ib]e, a teacher, no
Hi^htcr.&c- Why therefore is the charg^^ of choofinge remoiled from
the people to ihefe men ? Bccaufe forsooth the word of God was not
heard among the tumultes & feditious part;>kings of the people. And
whyfhoulde it not at this day be remoucd againc from thefcmen,
which not onely do breakc all lawcs, bur caftingc av»ay all fliame , do
wantonly, coue:oijlly,ambitioufl)5mingle and confounde Gods and
mens matters together?
5 Bur they lye, when they fay,y this was deuifed for a remedy.We
of:cn read that in old rime C hurciies wrrc in tumultes at the choofing
of bifliops.-yet neuer any man durft thinke of taking away the autho-
rity from the people. For they had other wayes whereby they might
either preuentthcfefaulteSiOr amend the if they were alredy comit-
ted. But I will tell what it is. When the people began to be negligent
in makinge the eledions , and did caft that care vpon the Pricftcs as
litle beloni»ing to them, they abufed this occafion to vfurp a tyranny
to themfclues, which afterwarde they ftablifticd by new Canons fdt
forth. As forthi^k ordering.itis nothing els but a mere mockagc.For
the (hew of examination that they there Cn out i^ fo vainc and hun-
gry,(hat it Wanteth cuen all colour. Thcr fore ^yh€ras iti fome places
s Princes
ToSaluation. " Lib.4. 452
Princes hauc by couenat obtained of the bidiops orRomf , that rhey
thcmfelucs mjehtname billiops,thcrcin the Church fuffered no new
loilcbccaufc the cledion was taken away , oncJy from the Canons,
which had by no riiiht violently take it,or verily ftolen it.Trueiy this
is a moft fowlc cxamplc,y out of the court are (cnt bilhops to poflc/fe
Churches: & it ihould be the worke of godly Princes to abftame from
fuch corrupiion.For it is a wicked fpoyling of y Church,when there
is thruft vnto any people a bifhop,whom they hauc not defjred,or at
Icaft With free voice allowed. But that vnordcrly maner which hath
longe ago bin in the Churches , gaue occafion to Princes to take the
prefentation of bilhops into their ownc handcs.For they had rather
that It rtiould be their gjft,than thofc n7cns,to whom it nothing mor«
belonged, and which did nolcfle wrongfully abufcit.
4 Loc here is a noble calling,by reafon whereof the bifhops boaft
themfelucs to be the fuccclTors of the Apoftlcs.But they fay that the
authority to create Pneftcs belongeth to them only.But in this they
moft lewdly corrupt the old inftitutionibecaufe they do not by their
ordering create Prieftes to rule and fede the people, but Sacrificers to
SacriliceXikcwifc when they confecrate Deacons,they do nothinge
of their true 8c proper office, bur they ordainc them only to certainc
Ceremonies about the chahceand the paten. But in the Synode Difl.7<
at Chalccdon , it is contrariwife decreed , that the orderings fhould ^-^P- »•
not be abfolutcly giuen , that is to fay, but that a place (houlde be
therewithall aflTigncd to them tliat arc ordered,where they (hall ex-
crcife their office. This decree is for two c.iuies very profitable. Firft»
that the Church ffiouldc not be burdened with fupcrduous charges :
nor that that (hould be fpent vppon idle men which ffiould be giuen
to the poore : Secondly^ that they which be ordcred,lliould thinkc
that they be not promoted to an honor , but that there is an office
committed vnto them, to the execution whereof they arc bounde by
Iblemne protcftation. But the Romifhc maifters ( which thinke that
there is nothinge in rehgion to be cared for, but their bellie ) fii (1 do
cxpouwic titlctobcthereuenue that may fufficc to fuftaine them,
whether it be by their owne liuclyhoode or by bencficc.Thcrcfore
when they order a Deacon or a Prieft.wirhout raking care where they
ought to miniftcr,thcy giue them the order,tf they be rich enough to
dndt themfelucs . But what man can admit this , that the title which
the decree of the Counccll requireth,(houldc be the yearcly reucnuc
for their fuftenance } But nowc becaufc the later Canons condem*
ned the biHioppes with penalty to finde them whom they had orde-
red without fuiHcieot: title^ by this mcane to redrainc their too much
LLL tiij
Cap.5. Of the outward meancs
eafie admitting: there bath bin alio a fuitelty deuiied to mbckc oOt
this penalty. For he that is ordered, nammgc any title wbatfoeuer it
bejpromifeth that he wiibe content there withrby this fhift he isdri-
uen from his adion for his finding. 1 pafTc ouer a thoufandc fraudes
that arc herein vfed : that when lomc do fallcly name vame titles of
bencfices,whcrupon they can not make fiuc (hillmgcs by yere;0{her
fome vnder fecret coucnar do borow benefices, which they promife
that they wil by^ndby rcttore againc , but fomtimc they rcftorc not
at all. And fuch other mifteries.
5 But although thcfe grofler abufes were take away.is not this al-
way an abfurdity, to appoint a Pntli to whom you ufligne no place f
Alfo they order no man but to SacriHcd. But the true ordinacc of a
Prieft iSjto be called to the t;ouernment of the Church;& a Deacon
to be called to the gathcnng of y almesuhcy do in decde with many
pompes fhadow their doing,that in the very fhovv u may hauc a rc-
ucrcce among the fimplc. But among men that haue their found wit,
what can thefe diOuiiings auailcjiFtherc be no found ftuffe or trueth
vnderncth them ? For they vfe Ceremonies about it, cither fetched
out of lewilhnes, or famed oi thelelues : which it were better to for-
bearc. But of true examination , (for I nothinge pafle vponthat
fhadow which they j:etaine)of the peoples c6lent,& of other things
neceflary,they make no mention, 1 call a Ihadow their foolifh geftu-
rings mete to be laughed at,framed to a fond & coldc connterfaiimg
of anticjuity. The brfhops hauc their deputies which before the or-
licring may enquire of their learnmge. But what ? whether they can
reade their mafl"es:whcther they an. decline a common nowne,that
they fhal light vpon in rcading,or coniugate a vcrbe,or do know the
fignification of one word,for it is not neccffary that they be cunning
enough to conftruc a vcrfe.And yet they bt- notputbackef 5 Prieft-
hoodcjwhich failc cucn in the childi(h rudimcnts,fo that they bring
any money or commendation of fauour. Of hkc (ortit is»that when
they arc brought to y altare to be ordei ed, it i<- asked thrife in a tong
.not vnderftandcdjwhether they be worthy of that honor.One aun-
fwcreih(which neuer faw themrbut bccaufe nothinge fhould want of
the forme, he hath that part in the play) They are worthy .What may
a man blame in thcfe rcuercnd fnhcrs , but that with mockingc in Co
open Sacrileges , they do without Oiamc laugh to fcorne both God
and men?But becaufe they are in long pofTeffion therof, they thinke
that nowc it is lawefull for thtm For whofoeucr dare once open his
mouth againft thefe fo euident and fo haynous wicked doingcs,hc is
foorthwich haled by them to punifhment of death , as though it were
one
one that had in olde ume difclofcd abrodc the holy miftcricj ot C c-
fcsjwould they do this if chcy thought that there were any God ?
6 Nowe howc much do ihey bchaue chcmfclues better m bc-
ftowingc of benehces:wh>ch thing was ones loined with y ordering,
but nowc II IS altogether feparate ? There is among them a diuerfc
mancr.For the Bjfhops onely do not confcrre bencfices:and in thofc
whereof they arefaidto hauc the conferrtnc, they haue not the full
right : but other hauc the prefcntation , an J thty retcinc onely the
title of collation for honors fake. There are alfo nominatios out of
fcholes,& rcfignations,cither (imple,or made for caufc of elchange,
commcndatone writings, prcucntions , and whatfoeuer is of that
forte. But they alfobehaue themfelues that none of the can rcproch
an other with any thing. So I affirme , that fcarcely cuery hundreth
benefice , is bcftowed at this day in the papacy without Simonic , as
tie oldc writers defined Simony.I do not lay that they all buy them
with ready money : but ihewc me one of twcntie that commetli to
a benefice without fomc by commendation ,fome either kinrcd or
alliance prQmorcth,and fome the authontie of their parcntes: fomc
by doing ot plealures do get themfelues fiuor. Finally benefices arc
gcucn to this eude , not to piouide for the Churches , but for them
that receiue them. Therefore they call them benefices , by which
wordc they do fufncicntlv declare, that they make no other accompt
ofihcm^butasthe bcnenciallgiftes of princes, whereby they either
get the fauour of their foidiars or rcwnidc their feruiccs.T omit how
thcfe rewardcs are bellowed vpon barbers,cookesjn)oile kepers,.ind
fuch dreggiilie men. And nowc ludiciall courtes do ring of no mat-
ters more, than aboute benefices;(o that a man may fay that they arc
nothing eh but a pray caft afore dogs to hunt after. Is this tolerable
cuen to be heard ofjthat they fhould be called Paftors , which h.iuc
broke into thcpoifeffioof a Church as into a ferme of their enemy?
that haue gotten it by brawling in the lawe ? that hauc bought it for
money? that haue deferuedit by filthy fciuices ? which being childrc
yet fcantjy able to fpeakc , haue recciued it , as by inheritance from
their wncles and kinfmen,and fome baltardes from their fathers?
7 Wouldeuer thclicentioufneileof thepeople,though they had
bene ncucr Co corrupt and lawelcflfc , haue gone fo farre j" But this i$
alfo more monftrous > that one man , (I will not fay what mane r of
man , but rruely fuch a one as can not goucrne himfelfc) is fct to go-
uerne fiuc or (ix Churches. A man may fee in thefc daycs in Princes
courtes , yong men that haue thre abbacies , two Bilhoprikes , one
Archbifnopnkc.Buc there be coinonly Canons with Hue^fix or feuen
C^.j. Of the outwardc mcancs
benefices , whereof they hauc no care at all, but in rccciuing the rc-
nenues. I will not obieOe , that it is cchc where cried oik againft by
the word of God , which hath long ago ceffcd to be ot any eiiima-
tion at all among ihem. 1 will not obied, that there haue bene many
mortfeuere pcnall ordinances in many councelis made ag.iinft this
wickcdnes : for thofe a!fo they boldly defpife as oft as they hli. But I
fay that both are monftrous wicked doings, which are vtterly againft
God 6( nature and the gouernment of the Churcb,that one robber
ih-ill opprcflfe many Churches at ones , and that he rtiould be called
a Paftor, which can not be prefente with his flocke though he would:
and yet (fuch is their fliamclefnefle ) they coucr fuch abhomi-
nable HUhincfTc with the name of the Ch6rc!>,to deliuer themfelues
from all blame. But alio (and God will) in thefc lewdeneffe* is con-
tcinedthat holy focceffion, by the merit whereof they boll that u is
wrought that the Church may not perilTie.
$ Now (which is the fecotidc marke in iudging a lawfull Paftor)
letvsfce howe faithfully they cxercife their office. Of the Prieftf
that be there created, fome be Monkes,fome be (as they call them)
Secular. The fiift of thefe two companies was vnknowen to the oldc
Church : and it is fo againft the profcfllon of Monkes , to hauc luch
a place in the Church, that in oldc tunc when they were chofen out
of Monaftcries into the cleri;ie,they ccfled to be Monkes. And Grc-
gorie,vvhoes time had much dreggc$,yct iuffered not this confulion
to be made. For he willeth that they be put out of the Clergic that
be made Abbots , for that no man can rightly be together both a
Monke and a clcrke : (ith the one is a hinderance to the other ,Nowe
if I afke,howc he wellfulHlleth his office,vvbom the Canons declare
to be vnmetc : what I pray yoii,will they aunfwerc?They will forfoth
iillegc vnto me thofe vntimcly borne decrees of Innocent and Boni-
face, whereby Monkes are fo receiued into the honor and power of
Priefthode,that they might flill abide in their Monaftcries. But what
reafon is this,that euery vnlearned alTejfo fone as he hath ones pof-
feflcd the fea of Rome,m.'»y with one word ouerthrowe all antiquity?
But ofrhis matter we (hall fpcake hereafter. Let this fuffice for this
timcjthat in the purer Church it was holden for a great abfurdity.if
a Monke did execute the office of Pricftbode. For Hierome fayeth
that he doth not execute the office of a Prieft, while he is conucrfant
among Monkes : and maketh himfelfc one of the common people
to be ruled by the Priefts. But, although we graunt them this , whac
do they of their dutie ? Of the mendicantes feme do preach : all the
other Monkes cither finger mumble vpnaaftes in their dcnnes. As
though
though cither Chrirt willcxl , or the nnture of the office fufFercth,
Pricrts to be made ro this purpofc. Wiicicas the Scripture plainly A<a,i®.
teftifieth, thaiit is the pncih office ro rule his ownc Church, is it not * J*
a wicked prophaiuiion,to turnc an other way,yeA vtterly to change
the holy mftitution of God? For when they arc ordered, they arc
expi cUy fo« biddc lo do the things that God comaunxlcth all pricfts.
For this 4oiig is fone to them : let a Monkccotente with his cloii^er,
not prelunve (o-mini(icrthc Sacramcmes, nor to execute any thing
belonging to publifce office. Let them deny , if they can , that it is an
open mockcrie of God , that any prieft (hould be made to this pur-
pore,toabiteinefr(>m his true and natural! office -.and that he which
hath the name, may not haue the thing.
. ^ I come to tbcfecuiar priefts:which arc partly beneficed men,
(as they call them) that is to fay , haue benefices whereupon to iiuc:
and partly do let out t'.eir daily labourc to hire,in maffim^jOr tingmgj
and hue as 11 were of a ftipcndc gathered thereupon. Benefices haue
cither care of foulcs, as biihoprikcs, and cures ofparoches : or they
be the ftipendcs of deiniie men , that get their tiuing with fini;ing,
as prebendes, Canonlhips, perfonages, and dignities, chaplainfhips,
and luchother.Howbcit, fins things are nowe turned vpfide dovvnc,
Abb.itics and prioncs ar-- gcuen to very boyes,by priuilcge , that is
to lay by common and vfuall ciiftome. As concerning the hirelingSj
that get their liuing from dny to day, what ihould they do otherwife
than they do?chat is in ieruile and llramcful maner to giuc out them
felucs tor game , IpecJally (ith there is (o great a multitude as nowe
the world f^varmeth with^Thercforc when they dare not beg opcn-
Jy , ocforafmuch as they thinke they ihouldcbut little profiteihat
way, they go about like hungry dogs , and with their imoortunacic,
as with barking, they enforce out of men againft their willes fome-
whattothruft into their bcaly. Here if I would ho about tocxprciTe
in wordes, howc great a dilhonour it is to the Church , that the ho-
nor and office of priefthod is come to this pomt , I ihould hiue no
cnde. Therefore it isnot mctc that the readers {hould Iroke for at
my handc fuch a lona; declaration as may be proportionall to lb
heinous indienitie. Brcfcly I fay, if it be the office of pnerthod, ( as
the word of God prefcribeth , and the awicient canons require ^ to
fcedethc Church,and togoucrne the fpnituallkingdomeofChrift: 1.C0T.4
all fucfa facrificers as haue none other worke or wages, butinma- *»•
king a market of maflcSjarcnotoncly idlcin their office, bucalfo
hiuc no office at all to exercifc. For there is no place afligned them
to teach : they haue poficKke to gouernc : Finally there is nothing
Cap.5. Of the outward meancs
Icftc to them , but the altar, whereupon to facrifice Chrift : which IS
not to offer to Go<i,but to deuils,as we (hall fee in an other place.
lo I do not here touch the oucwardc faulccs, but oncly the in-
vrardc euill,which Hicketh faii by the roote in their mihtution.I will
adde a laying , which will found ill in their eares: but becaufc it is
true , I muft fpcake it : thai in the fame degree are to be accompted
Canons , Deanes , Chaplains, Prouofh , and ail they that are feddc
with idle beneficesFor what feruicc can they do to the Church J* For
they hauc put from themfelucs the preaching of the word, the care
of difcipline , and miniftration of Sacraments , as to much trouble-
fomc burdens. What then haue they remaining, whereby they may
boaft thcmfelues to be true pricfts? Singing forfooth.anda pompe of
Cercmonies.Buc what is that to y purpofeMf they allcdge Cuftomc,
if vfe,if prcfcriprion of long time ; I againc on the other fide do lay
vnto them the definition of Chrift, whereby he hath expreffed ynto
vsboth true pnefts , and what they ought to haue that will be ac-
compted fuch. But if they can not bearc fo hard a lawe » to fubmit
themfelucs to Chriftes rule : at the leaft let them fuffer this matter to
be determined by the authoriiie of the Primitiue Church. But their
cafefhallbcneuerthc better, if ihcir ftatebciudgcd by the olde ca-
nons. They that haue degenerate into Canons , (hould hauc bene
priefts,as they were in olde time ,that lliould rule the Church in cp-
mon with the BitTiop, and be as it were his companions in the ofticc
of Paftor. Tho(e Chapiter dignities .is they call them , do nothing ac
ail belong to the goucrning of the Church:much lefTcjChapleinlliips,
and the other dregges of like names ,What accompt thenlhall wc
makeof them all?Truely both the word of Chrilt, and the vfage of
the Church excludeth them from the honor of pnefthode.Yet they
ftiffcly holde that they be priefts:buc we muft plucke of their vifour;
fo fhall wc finde, that their whole profefTion is moft ftrange and far
remoued from that office of priefts.both which the A poftles defcnbc
vnto vs,and which was required in the primitiue Church.Therefore
all fuch Orders, with what titles foeuer they be notified, fith they
be newe , being verily neither vpholden by the inftiiucion of God,
nor by the auncient vfage of the Church,ought to hauc no place in
the dcfcripcion of the fpiritual gouernment,which the Church hat/i
rcceiued confecrate with the Lordes owne mouth. Or (if they will
rather haue me to fpeake more fimply and groff-ly) for as much a$
chaplains,canons,Deane$, Prouofts,& other idle bealies of the fame
fortCjdo not fo much as with their litlc finger touch any (mall psrccll
of chat oiEcc % which is neccftarily required in pricfts , it is pot to be
fuftred,
lo baluaaon. L.ib.4. 455
(uffred,thacin wrongfully taking a (As honor vpon themfclucs, ihcy
(hould brcakc the holy inftitutionof Chrift.
1 1 There rcmaine Biftiopi , and pcrfons of Paroches ; who, I
would to God they did ftiiuc to rcteinc their office. For wc would
Willingly graunt vnto them , that they hauc a godly andcxceileat
office, if they did execute it. But when they will be accepted Payors,
wiiile thcyforfakc the Churches committed to them , and caft the
care of them vpon other , they do as if it were the Paftors office to
do nothing.lf an vfurer ^ ncuer ftirred his footc out of the city, would
profcllc himfclfa plowman, or a keperof a vincyardc:ifatou]diouf
that had bene continually in the batailc and in the campe,and haddc
neucr fccnc iudiciall court or bookcs , would boafthimfelfc for a
lawyer, who could abide (uch linking fohcs.'But thefe me do fomc-
what more abfurdly,that will fecmc and be called lawefuU Paftors of
the Church , and yet will not be fo. For howc many a one is there,
that doth fo much, as in (hcwc , excrcife the goucrncmentofhis
Church? Many do all their life long dcuoure the reucnues of Chur-
cheSjto which ihcy ncuer come fo much as to lokc vpon them.Some
orher do ones by yeare either come themfeiues , or fendc their ftc-
wardc,that nothint; {hould be loft in the letting to fermc. When this
corruptionfirft crept in,they that would cnioy this kindc of vacation,
exempted themfeiues by priuiledges: noweitisa rare example , to
hauc one rehdent in his owne Church. For they efteeme them none
otherwife than farmes , oucr which they fet their vicars as bailies or \
farmers. But this very naturallreafonrcicdcih,that he ftiouldbc
paftor of a flocke.ihat neuer fawe one fhepe thereof.
iz It appcreth that eucn in the time of Gregorie , there were HomiL
certainc fcedcs of this mifchief , that the rulers of Churches, began »7*
to be ncgligetm teaching: for he doth in one place grieuouflycom-
plaineofit. The world (faycthhe) is full of priefts: bur yetin the
narueft there arc feldomc workcmen founde : becaufe indecdewe
take vppon vs the office of prieft, but we fulfill not the workc of the
office. Againc, becaufe they haue not the bowellcs of cbariiie,thcy
will feeme Lordes : they acknowledge not themfctucs to be fathers.
They change the place of humihrie into the aduauncing of lordli-
nefle. Againc, but what do we, O paftours, which receiue y rewarde,
and Ate no woikcmcn? Wc arc fallen to outwardc btifincffe , and we
take in handc one thing , and performe an other. Wc leaue the mi-
niftene of prcachingrand to ourpunilhmcnt , as 1 fee , we are called
Biftiops , that kcepe the name of honor and not ofvertuc. Siihhe
vlech fo great {harpncftc of word(.s agamft thcm,which were but IcRc
Cap.j, . Of the outwarde meaflcs
concinuing and IcfTc diligent in chcir oflice: What 1 pray yoii\ W6^ld
he fay , if he fawe of the Bifhops almoft none, or truely very fewci
and of the reft fcarcely cuery hundreth man ones irr all his fife cd go
Tp into a pulpet? For men be come to fuch madiiefle , that it is com''
monlycompieda thing to bafe for the dif^nitic of a Bilhopjto make
a fcrmon to the people. In the time of Bcrnarde, things were fomc-
what more decayed; but vvc fee alfo witn howe iharpe c'nidings he
inueyeth againrt the whole ordcr:which yet it is hkely to haue bsiiQ
then much purer than It is nowe. :..,-.:,:<
i^ But 11: a man do weU wey & examine this outward forme of
ecdeftafticail goueincment that is at this diy vnder the papacy , he
fliall iindethat there is no thcuilh corner whcrin robbers do more
liccncioufly range without lawe and mcafure. Truciy all things are
there fo vnhke the mftitution of Chnft , yea (o contrary to it , they
arefo degenerate from the auncient ordinances and maners of the
Church, they arc fo repugnant to nature and rcafon ^thattheic can
bene greater iniurie done toChnft, than when chey pretend his
tiamc to the defence of fo difordred gouernement. We (fay they)
are thepillers of the Church,tlie chief Bifhops of rcJigio^y ^vicars of
Chrift.theheadesofthefaithfulhbecaufc the power of the Apoitles
isby fucceflion come vntovs. They, are alway bragging of rhefe
follies , as though they talked vnto flockes. But fo oft as they (hall
boaftof this , I will afke of them afgaine , what they haue common
with the Apoftles For we fpeake not ot any mheritabiy defcending
honor >that may be gcuen to men euen while they \y fltpilig,: but of
the office of prcachin'4,which they fo much flee from.Likewife wheo
we affirme that their kingdom is the tyranny of Antichnft^ byandby
they aunfwer, that it is that reuerende Hierarchiej io ofie praifed of
notable and holy men. As though the holy fathers, when they com*
mended the Ecclefiafticall Hierarchic or fpirituall gouernement, as
it was deliuercd them from handc to handc from the Apoftlcs , did
dreameof this miflhapen and wafte difordred heape., where the Bir
fhops are for themolt part , cither rude aifcs , which knowc not the
very flrft and common principles of faith, or fometime children yet
ncwe come from the nouf fe : and if any be learneder (which yet is a
rare example) they thinke a Bifhoprike to be nothing els hut a title
of glorioufnefleiand magnificence: where the perfoncs of Chucr
chcs thinke no more of fcedinge the flocke , than a flioemaker doth
of plowing: where all things are confounded with more than Baby-
lonicall difpei ling, that there remaineth no more any one fteppt
whole of chat ordinance of the Fathers.
14 What
I o valuation. JLID.4, - 45c>
-14 What if wc derccndc to their ma nei s ? where {lialbc that Matr.j,
light of the world , which Chrift rtqum th ? where is the faltc of the '^
earth } where is that hohncife ^ winch may be as a perpetuall rule to
iudgc by ? There is uo degree of men at this day more il fpokcn oC
for rioc,wantonne(re,dcin(ineirc,fiiully all '.indc of luftts. There arc
of no degree men etcher fitter , or coimwiger madtcrs of all deceit,
fraude,trearon,and breach of faith ; there is no where To great con«
nmg or boldnclie to do hurt.I piQa ouer (heirdifdainfulaciTe, pride*
cxtorcion , criiciiie. I pafle ouer the dilfolute liccncioufneiremall
the parts of their hfc. In futfering whereof tlic world is fo wcncd,
(iiat ic is not to be feared , that 1 ihould icemc to enforce any thing*
^o much. This one thing I fay , which fhey themfclues ftiall not be
able to denie.-that of the Bifhops there is almoft none,of the Parfoni
of parodies not c! ic hundreih man,but if ludgemcc fhould bcgeuca
of his maners , according to the oldc Canons , he ftiould be either
to be excommunicato , or at Icfi to be put from his office, I fccmc to
(ay fomwhat incredible : fo farre is that auncienc Difciphnc growca
out of vfe, that commaunded an exaftcr triall to be Iiad of the ma-.
ncrs of the dergic : but the truth is fo. Novir let them go, that fij^hc
vndcr the ftanderd and guiding of the fee of Rome, & let thco) boft
among thcmfelues of the order of prieftchodc. As for the order that
they hauc , trucly it is euident, the it is^ncithcr of Chrill , nor of hiS'
Apoftles,nor of the fachci$,nor of the olde Church. • -^
I ^ Nowc let the Deacons come forth,and that moft holy diftri*
buting that they haue of the goods ofthcChurchjHowbcittbcy do
not nowe creat their Deacons to that purpofe/or ihcy cnioine them
nothing els but to minifter at the alcar,to read and ling the Gofpell,*
and do I wore not what triflcs.Notl>ing of the almes,nothingof the
care of the poore,norhingof all that fundio which they in olde time
executed.! fpeakeofthe very mlhtuiion For if we haue rcfpcd what
they dojin decdt it is not to them an office,bui oncly a ftcppc toward
prieflhoode. In one thing , they that kcpc the Deacons place at the
maire,dorcprefcntc a voidc image of antic|uity.For they recciuc the
offi ingj before tf c confccration. This was the auncientmancr.that
before the communion of the Supper , the faithfuU did kiffe one ai»
other,and ofler their aJmes at the aharrfo firft by a fignc,& afterward
by very hbcrahtie they fliewed their charitie.Thc Deacon, that wa«
the poorc mens fteward.receiued that which was giuen,todiftributc
it.Nowc of thole alme», there comcth no moi e to the poo: e.than if
they verc tbrowcn into the fca. Ti crefo.rc chcy mockc the Church
with this lying Dcaconne. Truely thejiQ c^cy haikc nothing like.
Cap.j. Of the outwarde mcancs
neither to the inflitutton of the Apoftlcs,nor to the auncicnt vfagc.
But the very deftnbution of the goods they haue coueyed an other'
way : and haue (b framed it, thax nothing can be dcuifedmorc vnor-
dcrly. For as theues ,whcn they haue cutte mens throres , do duiidc
the pray among them; fothefe, after the <]uenchingof th«>]ight of
Gods wo: d,as though the Church were flame, do thmke.that what--
(ocuer was dedicate to holy vfes is laid open for pray and fpoilc^
Therefore making a diuifion,euery one hath faatched to himlelfe as
much as he coulde. : r n- ? '; •>
16 Here all thefcolde orders, that we haue declared, arc not
oncly troubled, but vttcrly wiped out and rafcd. The Bi(hops and
priefts of cities, which being made riche by this pray, were.iourned
into canonsjhaue made hauocke of ihe chicfe part among them.Buc
it appereth that the partition was vnorderlyjbecaufe to thfs day they
ftriuc about the boundes. Whatfoeuer it be,by this diuilion it is pro-,
uided,thatnotonehaIfepcny ofthc goodes of the Church fhould
come to the poore.whoes had bene the balfe part at leaft For the ca-
nons dogiue them thefowerdi part by namerand the other fowerth
parte they do therefore appoint to the BiHiops , that they fhouldc
bcftowc It vpon hofpitahtie , and other duiics of charitic. I (peakc
not what the clerkesoughttodo with their portion,and towhatvfc
they ought to bcflowe it. For we haue fufficiently declared, that the
reft which is appointed-: for temples , buildings and other cxpenfes,
ought to be open for the poore in neccffiiie. I pray You,if they had
one fparke of the fearc of God in their harr, would they abide this
burden of confcience,that all that they eare,and whcrewnh they be
clothed , Cometh of thcfte ,yea of facrileiie ? But firh they arc litlc
moued with the iudi^ementof God, they ihould atlesft thinke, that
ihofe be men endued with wit and reafon , to whome they would
perfuade , that they haue fo goodly and well framed orders in their
Church , as they arc wont to boaft. Let them aunfwer roe fhortly,
whether deaconric be alicece to fteale and robbe.If they denie this,
they.ihall alfo be compelled to confcfl'e, that they haue no deaconric
left : for as much as among them, all the difpofition of the goodes of
the Church is openly tourncd into a fpoiling fullof facrilegc.
17 But here they vfe a very faire colour. For they fay , that the
dignitic of the Church is by that magnificence not vncomjily vphoU
den. And they haue of their feftc fome fo{liamelefle,that they dare
openly boaftjthat fo onely arc fulfilled thofe prophecies,whereby the
oide Prophets defcribe the glorioufnefle of the kingdome of Chrift,
when that kingly gorgeoufneffe isfccn io the pricftly order. Not in
vainc
rayne {fay they) God hath promifcd thc(c things to his Chu;ch: Pri7 =
Kings (hall comcjiliey lluU worlhip in thy Hglitjihcy fhall bring thee * °-
giftes. Anre,arire,clothc thte with thy ftrcngth,0 Syon : clothe thee ^ ^^^
with the garmcnrcs of thy ^loric,0 Hicruialem; All Ihall come from ^,
Saba, bringing golde and inccnfc, and fpcaking praife to the Lordc.
All the cattcll ol Cedar (halbc gathered together to thee. If i llioiiJd
tanc long vpon confuting ihislcwdneffc.I feareleaft I fliouldlccmc
fondc. 1 hci cfore 1 will not lofc wordcs in vainc. But I afkc : if any
lewe would abuie ihcfe tcltimonics, what folution would they gcuc?
Verily they would reprehf nde hu dullnefle , for that he tranvierrcd
thofe things to the tklh and the woild , that arc fpirituaily fpokcn of
the fpirituall kmgdome of ChnliFor we knowe, that the Prophetes
vndcr the image of earthly things, did pamt out vnto vs the heaucnly
gloric of God , that ought to lljine in the Church. For the C hurcli
hadneucr leflc abundance of thcfc bitffings , which their wordes
fxprcflc, thaninihciimcofihe Apoftles : and yet all confcfTe, that
the force of the kingdomc of Chnft then chicBy florifhed abioadc.
What then mean thefe fayme* ? Whatfocuer is any where pj ecious,
hy,exccllcnt,itought tobe made fubied to the Lord. Where as iti$
namely fpoken of kings, that they (hal fubmit their fceptcrs to Chrifl",
that iheyfliall throwc downc their crownes before his fecte,that
they (hall dedicate their tcodes to the Church : when (will they fay)
Was It better and more fully performed, than when 1 hcodofius,caf-
ling away his purple roabe, leau ng the ornamcntcs of the empire,
as fomc one of the common pcople,fubmitted himfelfe betore God
and the Church , to folcmne penance ? then when he and other hkc
godly prince* beftowed their endeuors and their cares to prefcruc
pure dodrinc in the Church, and to cherifli and dcfende founde tea-
chers ? But howe priefts at that time excedcd not in fupcrfluous ri-
cheHc , that oncly fcntence of the Sinode at Aquileia , where Am-
brofc was chief, fufficicntly dcclarcth : Glorious is pouertie in the
priefts of the LordTrucly the Birtiops had at that time fome richcfle,
wherewith they might haue fet out the Churches honor,if they had
thought thofe to be the ti ue ornamentcs of the Church. But when
they knew that there was nothing more againft the office of Paftors,
than to glifter and ihew themfelues proudly with deintinefife of fare,
with gorgeoufnelTe of garments, with great tram of leruanteSjWiih
liately pal3ccs,thcy followed & kept the humblencfle & modeftic,yca
the very pouertie which Chrift holily appointed amo^ his minifters,
i8 Bur, that we may not be to long in this point, let vsagaine
gather into a ihorc rurome, howc fane that dilpefation or difSpacioa
MMM
Cap.j. Of the outwardc mcanes
of the goods of the Church, that is nowevfed, diffcreth from the
true cicacpnrie, which both the word of God commendeth vnto v$,
and the auncicm Church obferued. As for that which is bcftowed
vpon the garnifhing of temples,! fay it is ill beftowedjif that meafurc
be not vfed, which both thcvery nature of holy things appoimeth,
and the Apoftlcs and other holy fathers haue prefcribcd both by
dodrinc and examples. But what hkc thing is there fecn at this day
in the temples? whatfoeuer is framedjl will not fay after that aunciec
fparing , but to any honell meane it is reiedcd Nothing at all plea-
(et'h , but that which fauoureth of riot and the corruption of times.
In the meane time they are Co farre fro hauing due care of the Iiuc-
ly temples , that they woulde rather fufifcr many thoufandes of the
poorc to perifh for hunger , than they would breake the Icaft chalice
or cruet, to releue their needc. And that I may not pronounce of my
felfe any thing more greuoufly againft them, this oncly I would haue
the godly readers to thinke vpon: if it ihould happen that fame
Exuperius bifhop of Thc^ofa , whom we euennowc rehearfed , or
Acatiusjor Ambrofe, or any fuch to be raifed from death,what they
Would fay. Truely they would not allowe that in fo great neceflicic
of the poore,richctreinamaner fuperfluous ihould betournedan
other way Admit I fpeakc nothing howe rhcfe vfes vpon which they
be bcftowed,(although there were no poore)arc many waies hurtful,
but in no behalfc profitable. Bur I Icaue to fpeakc of men. Thefc
goodes are dedicate to Chrift: therfore they are to be difpofed after
hisv/ill. But they (hall in vaine fay, that this part is beftowed vpon
Chnft,v/hich they haue wafted othcrwife than he commaumied;
Howbeit.toconfefle the trucih, there is not much of the ordinaric
reuenueofthe Church abated for thefe cxpcnfes. For there arc no
bitlioprikcs fo welthy, no abbaries fo fatte , finally neither fomany,
nor fo large benefices , that may ferue to fill the gluttonic of priefts.
But while they feke to fpare rhentifclues, they perfuade the people by
fuperftit!on,to turne that which ihould be beftowed vpon the poorc,
to builde temples , to fetne vp images , to buy iewels , to gettc coftly
garmentcs.So with this gulfe are the daily almes confumcd.
19 Of the rc'.ienue,that they receiue of their landes and poffei^
fion.what els ftiall I fay,but that which I haue already faid, & which
is before all mens eyes ? We fee with what faithfulneffe they which
are called bifhops and Abbots do difpofc the greatcft parte. What
madneffe is it,to feekc here for an ecclefiafticall order ? Was it mete
that thcy,whofc life ought to haue bene a fingular example of fruga-
lictCjoAdeftie, continence, and humilities (hould comcnde with the
royaltic
To Saluation. Lib^. 458
fbyalric ofprinces in number of goodcs, in gorgioufn* ffc of houlcs,
in dcintineirc of appartlJ and fare ? And howc much was this con-
trary CO thch- ofHc'-,that they, whom the erernall and muiolable c6- Tit.i.y
iraundemcnt of Gcd forbiddcth to be dcfirous of filthy a'gainc, and
bitMeth to be c orcnfe with fimplc hiim^.lhould not only lay handcs
vpon towncs and cjltcis , but nlfo vrolcntly entre vpon the grcatcll
loidlh»ps,fin:!lly poOefil forccrably very empires ? If they defpifc the
word of God : what will they auiifwere to thofe auncient decrees
of the Synodcs : whereby it is decreed that the bilhop fhould hauca ^^ ..
fmall lodging not farrc from the Church, mcanc fire 8c houfcholJc lJ^^ (^ gj.
fturt'e f what will they fav to thai praife of the Synode at Aqui- thap 4.
Icia : where poueriieis reported glorious in the pri-rftsof the Lorded cnp.14
For pcrhappcs.they will vtterly ref'.ile as to much rigorous , that *" '^'
which Hicrome aduileth Ntpo»anus,thai poore men and ItrangerSi
and among them Chrilt as a gucft , may knowe his table. But that
which he by and by addcch , they will be aOiamed to denie , that it is
the glory of a billiop toprouidc forthegoodes of the poorcrthat
it is the Ihame of all pri'lh to ftudy for their owne richcftc. But they
can not rccciue thi$,i->utthey mufl all codcmnc themfelues of Ihame.
But it IS not nccdcfull in this place to fpeake more hardly againft
them, fith my meaning was nothing els , but to (hcwe , that among
them thelawcfull ord^rof dcaconryis long ago taken away: that
they may no more gloi ic of this title to the commendation of their
Church : which I tliinke I hauc already (utficiently {hewed.
The vj. Chapter.
of the Supremaae of the See of T{omt.
Hitherto we hauc reherfed thofe orders of y Church, which
were in the goucrncmetttof ihc olde Church : but afier-
wardc corrupted in nmes,and from thencefoorthc morft
and more abufcd, do nowc in the Popiflic Church retcinc
oncly their name, and in dcede are nothing els but vifoUrs : that by
ccmparifon the godly reader might iudge , what mancr of Church
the Romanifles haue , for whoes fake they make vs fchifmatikcs, bc-
caufe we hauc departed from it. But as for the hed and top of the
whole order^fhat is to fay,thc fupremacy of the fee of Rome,whcrc-
by they trauailc to prouc that they only haue the catholike Church,
we haue not yet touched it : bccaufe it toke beoinninp neither from
thcinftitution of Chrift, nor from the vfe of the olde Church ,at
thole former partes did: which we haue fliewed to hauc fo pre-
ceded from anuquiue ,that by wickcdncflc of times they arc vticiJ/
MMM i^
Cap.^. Of the outward meancs
degenerate, and hauc put on alkogcthcr a new forme. Ancf yet they*
go about to perfuade the world.that this is chc chief and in a maner
onely bonde of the vnitie of the Church , if wc cleaueto the fee of
Rome, and continue in the obedience thereof. They rci\ (1 fay)
principally vppon this ftay i when they will take away the Churcn
from vs , and chime it to themfelues ,for that they kcpe the head,
vpon which the vnitie of the Church hangeth , and without which
the Church muft needesfall afunder and be broken in pieces. For
thus they ihinke, that the Church is as it were a maimed and head-
lefic body , vnleffe it be fubicd: to the fee of Rome , as to her head.
Therefore when they talke of their Hierarchie,they alway take their
beginning at this principle : that the bilhop oi Rome (as the vrcar of
Chrift, which is the head ofthe Church) is in his ftcedc Preiideht
of the vniuerfall Church : and that othcrwife the Church is not well
ordred , vnlefle that See do holde the Suprcmacic aboue all other.
Therefore this alfois 16 be examined, of what fort it is: that we
may omitt nothing that perteineth to a iuft goucrnement of the
Church.
1 Let this therfore be the principal point of the qucftion: Whe-
ther it be neceflary for the true forme of Hierarchic (as they call it)
or cccleiiaiiicali order,that one See (liould be aboue the other both
in dignitie & in power,that it may be the hcade of y whole body.Bui
ive make the Church fubied to too vniuft lawes , ifwc lay this nc-
ceflity vpon it,without the word God.Therfore if the aduerfarieswil
proue that which they require, they muft firft Ihew y this difpolition
was ordcined by Chrift.Forthis purpofc ihty alledgeout ofthe law
the hy priefthodc , alfo the hy ludgement , which God did mftjtutc
at Hierufalem. But it is cafy to geue a folution,and that many waye*,
if one way do not fatisfic thcm.Firft no reafon compellcth to cxtcdc
that to the whole world , which was profitable in one nation : yea ra-
ther, the order of one nation and of the whole world (ball bcfarre
difFcrent.Becaufe the lewes were on echc fide compared with idola*
trers: that they fhould not be diuerfely drawen with varictie of rc-
ligionSjGod appointed the place of worftiipping him in the middcft
part of the landc : there he ordeined ouer them one head bifhop,
whom they fliould all haue regard vnto, that they might be y better
keptc together in vnitie.Nowe, when religion is fpred abroadc into
the whole world, who doth not fee thar it is altogeti ,cr an abfurdity,
that the gouernment ofthe Eaft and Wtft be geuen to one man?For
it IS in cffed as much as if a man fhould affirme,that the whole world
ought CO be goucrned by one ruler^becaufe one piece of landc hath
no
no mo rulers but one. But there is yet an other rcalbn , why that
ought not to be made an exaplc to be followed No man is ignoranc
that that hy biiliop was a figure of Chrift. Nowe, fins the pricllhcdc
is remoucd jthat right mull alio be remoued. But to whom is it re- Hebr
moucd ? Trucly , not to the Pope (as he htmfclfe is fo bold {hime- i s.
IclTciyto bo.ift)when he diaweth this title to himfelferbut to Chrift,
which as he alone fufteineth this office , without any vicar or fuc-
ccflbr , fo he refigneth the honor to none other. For the priefthodc
-confifteth not in dodrine onely, bat in the appcafing of God, which
Chrift hath fully wrought by his dcath,and in that inierctftio which
he nowe vfeth with his Father.
^ There is therefore no caufc why they fliould bind vs by this
example, as by a perpetuall rule, which we haue fene to be enduring
but for a time. Out of the newe teftament they haue nothing to
bring forth for proofc of their opinion,but that it was fayed to one:
Thou art Peter, & vpon this ftone I will buildc my Church.Againe, Mat.
Peter, Loucft thou me? Feedc my fhepe.But admitting chat thefe be ^^j^
ftrong proues , they muft firft fhewe , that he which is commaunded ° *
to feedc the flocke of Chrift , hath power committed to him ouer all
Churches : and that to binde and to lofe is nothing els but to be
ruler of all the world. But as Peter had rcceiued the comaundement
of the Lorde , fo he exhorteth all other priefts to feedc the Church. i.P<«
Hereby we may gather,that by this faying of Chrift,there was either *•
nothing geuento Peter more then to the reft, or that Peter did ^ '
cgally communicate with other the power that he had rcceiued. But,
that we ftriue not vainly , vvc haue in an other place a clearc expofi-
tion out of the mouth of Chrift, what is to binde and to loferthat is
to fay > td reteine and to forgcue (innes. But the maner of binding
and loohngjboth the whole Scripture eche where {heweth,and Paul a.Cc
very well dedarethjwhen he faith that the miniftcrs of the Gofpell, ^•*'
haue comaundement to reconcde men to God, and alfo haue power
to puniftie them that rcfufc this bcnefite.
4 Howe (hamefully they wreft thofc places, that make mention
of binding and loofing , I both haue already fliortly touched , and a
Iitlc hereafter 1 ftiall haue occafion to declare more at large. Nowe
it is good to fc onely , what they gather of that famous aunfwerc of
Chrift to Peter. He promifed him y keyes of the kingdome of heaue:
he fayed that whatfocucr he boundc in earth , ftiould be boundc m
heauen.If we agree vpon the word keyes,and the maner of binding,
all contention fhall by and by ccircFor the Pope himfclfe will gladly
geuc Qucr the charge eniouicd (o che Apoftlcs , which being full of
MMM iij
Cap,6. Of the outvyardc mcancs
trauailc and gnef,rtioulcl ihalcefrom him his plea(urcs,with6utgaine.
Forafmuchas the hcauens are opened vnto vs by thedodrineof the
Gofpell ,ic is with a very fie metaphore exprefTed by the ijamc of
keycs.Nowe nvcn arc bounde and loofed >n no other wifcbut whcu
fatch reconciler h fome to God , and their owne bclefe biadcch othcc
fome. If the Pope did take this onely vpon him : I thinke there WiU
be no man ihac would cither enuie it or dinuc about it. But becaufc
this fucccffion being trauailiome and nothing gainefull pleafeth not
the Pop£jherenpon groweth the beginninj; of the contcntion,whar
Chriftproraifed to Peter. Therefore Igather by the very rnatccrit
felfc , that there is nothmg meant by the dignitic of the office of an
Apofticjwhich cannot be feuered from the charge. For if that dcfi'
nitio which I haue rehearred,be receiued (which can not but (hamc*
lefly be rcieded) here is nothing gcuen to Peter, that was not aho
common to his other fellowes : becaufe otherwife there (liquid no?
only wrong be done to the perfonSjbuc the very maieftie of dodrinc
fhould hale. They crie out on the other (i Jc : what auaileth it, I pray
yoUjto run vpon this rockc?'For they (liall not prouejbut as the prca-
ching of one fame Golpcll was eniomed ro all the Apoftles , fo they
were alfo all .ilike furnifhcd with power to binde Sc loofe.Cbrift (fay
I«.i 8 they) appointed Peter Prince of the whole Church , when he pro-
7 mifcdthat he would geue him the keyes.Butthac which he then pror
'"•*°* mifed to one,in an other place he gaue it alfo to all the rcft,and deli-
uercd it as it were into their hades.If the fame power were grauntcd
to all, which was promifcd to one, wherein ihall he be aboue his felr
lowes ? Herein(f3y they) he cxcellcthjbecaufc he receiued jt both in
comon togcther.wi.ch them, & feuerally by himfclfe, which was not
geuen totheother.butin common.Wharif I anfwcrc with Cyprian
e /im. and Auguftine , that Chrift did it not for this purpofe , to prefer one
"*• man before oihcr,buc fo to fet put y vniiie o{ the Church. For thus
fayeth Cyprian, that Qod in the perfon of one gaue the kcyes to all,
to fignific the vnitic of alhand ihap the reft were the fame thing that
f Peter was,endued with hkc partaking both of honor and powerrbut
; that the beginning is taken at vnitie, that the Church of Chrift may
omil. ^^ Ihewcd to be one. Auguftine fayeth : If there were not in Peter a
I lo I . miftery of the Church , the Lordc would not fay to him, I will geue
omil. thee the keycs.For if this was fayed to Pcter,ihc Church hath them
'• not : but if the Church haue them,then Peter, when he receiued the
keyes,betokcned the whole Church. And in an other plapc. When
they were all afked,onely Peter aunfweredjthou art Chriftj and it is
faid to him , I will geue thcc the keyes » as though he alone had re-
ceiued
To Saluation. . Lib.4. 4^0
ceiued tVic power ot binding and loofingiwhereas both he being one
faid the one for all,and he receiued the other with all, as bearing the
pcffonot vnitic.Thercforc one for all, bccaufe there is irnuie in all.
-I'f,:; But this, Thou art Pcrcr, and vpon this rocke I willbildemy ^^'•
Church,is no where red fpokcn to any other. As though Chrift fpake *
there any other thing of Peter,than that which Paul and Peter him-
fclfc fpeakethof all Chriftians. For Paule maketh Chrift the chiefc Ephc
and corner ftone , vpon which they arc bilded together that growc ^^'
into a holy temple to the Lorde. And Peter biddeth vstobeliuely ' *'
ftoncs which being founded vpon that chofen and precious ftone,do
by this ioynt and coupling together with our God, cleaue alfo toge-
ther among our fducsHc (fay they) aboue the i elhbecaufe he hath
the name pcculiarly.In deede I do willinj. ly graunt this honor to Pc-
tcr,that in the bilding of the Church he be placed among the firft,or
( if they will haue this alfo) the firft of all the faithfulhbut I will not
luflTerihcm to gather thereupon, that he fl\ouldhauc a Supremacic
ouer y rcft.For what mancr of gathering is this ? He exccUcth other
in feruemnefle of zelc, in learning , and courage : therefore he hath
power oucr the. As though wc might not with better colour gather,
that Andrewe is in degree before Peter,bccaufe he went before him
in time , and brouglit him to Chnft. But I palfe oucr this. Let Peter ^°^^
truly haue y firft place:yct there is great difFt rence betwcnc y honor '^^ ^
of degree and power. We fee that the Apoftles commonly graunicd
4:histoPetcr,tl)athefhould fpeakeinaliremblies,& after acertainc
maner go before them v/ith propounding , exhorting, and admoni-
shing : but of his power we readc nothing at all.
I 6 Howbeit we bcnot yet cometodifputcof thatpointt onely
at this prefcnr I wo-jld proue,that they do to fondly reafonswhen by
■the oncly name of Peter they would bildc an Empire ouer the wliele
Church For ihofc olde follies wherwiih they went about to deceiue
at the beginning , are not worthy to be lehearfcd , much lelfe to be
4c6futed,that the Church v/as bilded vpon Peter,becaufe it was faid
vpon thisrock.Sic. Butfomc of the Fathers haue fo expounded it.
But when the whole Scripture crieth out to the contrary , to what
purpofe is their authoritie alleged againft God? Yea, why do wc
ftiiuc about the meaning of thefe wordcs,as thoughi t were darke or
iloutfulljwhc nothing can be more plainly nor more certainly fpoke?
Peter had cofefled in his owne and his brcthrens name , that Chnft '^^t.
is the fonncof God. Vpon this rocke Chrift bildeth his Church: '**
bccaufcit is (as Paule faycth) the onely foundation, beh'de which , q
there can belayed none orhcr.Neither do I here thcrfore refufc the j.u.
MMM iiij
' Czp.6. Of the outwardemcanes
authority of the Fathers, becaufc 1 wante their teftimonics,if I lifted
to allege them : but ( as I haue fayed ) I will not with contending
about fo cleare a matter trouble the readers in vainc , (pccially iith
this point hath bene long agoc diligently enoug!» handeled and de-
clared by men of our fide.
7 And yet m deede no man can better afloile this qucftion,thart
the Scripture itfclfc,if we compare all the places, where it teachethj
what office and power Peter had among the Apoftles,howc he be-
haued himfelfe,and hovve he was accepted of them. Runne ouer all
that remaineth written , you iTiall finde nothing els , but that he was
one of the. xij. c^Al with the reft , and their fellowc,, but not rheir
•''* Lordc. He doth in deede propounderothecouncell,ifanything be
to be donc,3nd geueth warning; what is mete to be done : but ihere-
wirhall he heareth other , and doth not oncly graunte them place to
fpcake their minde , but Icaueth the iudgcment to tlicm -.when they
had determined , he followed and obeyed. When he writcrh to the
'ec. PailorSjhe doth not commaunde them by autboritic,as Supcrioi:but
he makcth them his companions , and gendy exhorteth them , as
C2alles nre wont to do. When he was sccu'ed for that he had gone in
1. 1 1, to the Gentiles, although it were without cau!e,yet he aunfwcred 8c
purged himfelfc. When he was commaundcd by his fellowes , to go
* ' wrh lofin into Samaria , he refufed not. Whereas the ApolUes did
fend himjthey did thereby declare that they helde him not for their
fijperior.Wheras he obeyed and toke vpon him the embalfage com-
mitrcd to him,he did thereby confeirc>that he had a feliowfliip with
thcm,and not an authority ouer them. If none of thefe things were,
1.1 1, yet the only Eptftle to the Galathias may calily take all douting from
^ 2* vs.'where almoft in two whole Chapters together Paulc trauaileth to
proue nothing els , but that he himfclfe was egall to Peter in honor
of Apoiilelliip. Then he rchearfeth ih.it he came to Peter , not to
profcife fubicdion , but oncly to make their confcnt of dodrine ap-
proued by teftimonie to all raen;and that Peter himfelfe required no
fuchihingjbut gauc him his right hande of fellowfhip, to workein
common together in the Lordes vineyarde:& that there was no Icifer
gracegeuen to him among the Gentiles , than to Peter among the
lewes: Fmally that when Peterdealt not very faithfully, he was cor-
rt-dedby him, and obeyed his reprouing. All thefe things do make
plaine, either that there was an equalitie betwecne Paulc and Peter^
or at leaft that Peter had no more power ouer the reft, than they
had ouer him. And (as I haue already fayed) Paule of purpofcla-
boureth about this ^ that none (houidc pretcrrc before him in the
Apoftlc-
To Salftacion. Lib.4. 4^1
Apoftlcfhip either PciefjOr lohn,which were fclowcs not Lordcs.
, 8 Bufjto graunt thcni chat which ihey require conccrnin^c Pc*
tcr,thatis,thathc wa^the Prince of the ApolHci, and excelled the
reft in dignity :yet there is no caufe whyihey (houid ofafingular ex-
ample make an vniaerrali rule , and drawc to perpetuity that whicti
hath bin once done : fith there is a fjrrc differingc r^afon. One was
chiefc among the ApoiUcstforfooth, becnufethey were few in num-
ber. If one were the chicfe of twelue men.fhall it therefore foiovv that
one ought to bemade rokr of a hundred thoufandc mcnnc ? It is no
fnaruell that tweliie had one atnongc them that Ihbuld rule themali;
For nature bcarcththis,and the wittc ofme;n requireth this,that in
euei y aircmbiy,ahhough they be all cgal in power,yct there be one
as a gouci nour,whome the reft may haue regarde vnto.There is n6
totxrc without a Confoll:no fcflio of iudgcs without a pretor,or pro-
pounder, no company without a ruler, no felowftiip without a mai**
ifter.vJya llnoulde it be no abfurdity, if we confeftcd that the Apoftles
|!au^To Peter luch a fupremacy. Bury which is of force amoni^ few,
jshot byandby to bcdrawcn to the whole world,to thcruling where-
of no one man is fufficict. Bui ( fay they ) this hath place no leffe in
the whole vniuerfdliry ofnature, than in all the partes, that there be
one foucr.iigne head of all. And hcreof(and God will)they fetche a
proofe from cranes and beesrwhich ahvay choofe to thcmfclucs one
guide, not many. I allow in dede the exaples which they bring forth:
but do bees rcforte together out of all the woilde to choofe them
one kinge ? euery fcuciall king is content with his owne hyuc. So a-
tnong cranes, eucry heard hath their owne king. What clfe fhaU they
prouc hcreby,but that euery Church ought to hauc their own feucral
biftjop appointed them?" Then they call vs to ciuilc examples. They
allcage y laying of Honierc,It is not good to hauc many goucrnour*:
*& fuch things as in like fenfc arc red in prophanc writers to the coril,
nicndation of Monarchie.The anfwerc is caficFor Monarchic is not
praifed of Vlyfles in Homere> or of any other , in this mcaningc , as
though one ouglit to be Emperor of y whole world:but they meanc
to n^ew that one kingdom can not hold two kingcs:& that powcr(a|
he caileth it)can abide no companion.
- 9 But let it be, as they will) that it is good and profitable that the
whole worlde be holden vndcr Monarchic, which yet is a very great
abfurdity.-but let it be fo:yet I will not therefore graunt that the fame
ihould take place in the goucrnment of the Church.For the Church
hath Chrift her only headjVnder wiiofc dominion we al deaue togc-
ather^according lo that ordct and chat forme c^policy which he iiath
Gap.^, OTthe outward mi^ahcs
Xphr.4« prcfcnbeAThcrforcthcy do a great wronge to Ghrift,when fey thjit
*i* prcienfc they wil haue one man to be ruler of the vniucrfalChurcn,
bccaufe it caiaot bcwithout a head.For Chriftistheheadjof whom
the whole body coupled and knit together in cucry ioinc, wherewith
one miniftreth to an other,accoiding to the working of cuery mcra-
'bcf in the mcaftirc therof,raukcthencrca(e of ehe body.See you notj
how he fetteth all men without exception iri the- body,& Icaucth the
ihofior & name of head to Chrift alone ? Sec you not how he giucth
do cucry mcmbec a ccrtainc mcafure,Sc3ilcix:rmjLned & limited fun*
iftion;wlietby both the perfedion of thegracc & the foueraigne po-
iWcr of gouernaccmay remame with Chrift pnly?Ncither am [ ignor
'canc what thty are wont tocauiU, whe this is obiciftcd againft them:
<th(Ly fay that Chrjft is properly called the only hcd,bccaufe he alone
-pcigneth by his own authority & m his owne name;but that tht? no»
•clung withftandethjbut that there may be vndcr him an other mini?
>fierial headc(as they terme it)that may be his vicegerent in earth.But
by thisrauillation they prcuailc nothing, vnlcffc they firft {hew that
this minifteiy was bi'dained by Chrift.For the A^oftle teachcth,that
fthe. whole miriiftratiois difpcrfed through ihcimcmbcrs,& that the
* j^''* power fl owe th from the one hcauenly hcad.Or if ihey wil haue it a-
ij.X t, *ny plaffier fpoken,(ith the Scripture teftifieth that Chrift is the hed^
I J, ^ claimcth that honor co him alone,it ought not to be transferred tp
Colofi any othetjbut whom Chrift himfelf hath made his vicar.Buty isnoc
i8 fit t» ^j^iy j^^ where red, but alfo may be largely confuted by many places .
Bp*he.4. '^ ^^"^ fomtimes dcpainteth vnto vs a liucly image of y Church
»o. tjf one head he maketh there no mention.But rather by his deknp'
jtion we may gather, that it is difagrcing fro the inftitution of Chnft.
-■Chriftat his afcendmg tookc fro vs the vifible prcfence of himfelfq:
yet he went vp to fulfill all thinges.Now therefore the Church hath
Hph« 4^ him yet prefent, and alway (hall haue. When Paulc goeth about to
7«& iif fhew the meancwherby he prefentcth himfelfe,he calleth vs backc
fto the minifterics which he vfeth. The Lord(fayth he)i$ in vs alljacr
*ording toy meafurc of grace y he hath giuen to eucry meber.Ther"
fore he hath appointed (bme Apoftlcs,fome Paftors.fome Huange**
liftc$,othcr fomc Teachers &c.Why doth he not fay,that he hath fct
t>ne oucr all,to be his viccgerent?For the place required that princi-
•pally,and it could by no meanes haue bin omitted, if it had bin true.
Chrift(fayth he)is with vs. How ? by the miniftery of men, whom he
bath appointed to goucrne the Church. Why not rather by the mi-
nifterial head,to whom he hath comittcd his ftede?Henameth vniry:
but in Godj& inche faith^of Chrft.He a/Iigacth cp men nothing bu^
common
ToSaluation. Lib.4. ^6%
common minillcry, & to cucry one a particular mcafurc.In that 1 6-
mcnJatfo of vnicy,aftcr that he had fayd that there is one body,onc
SpiiitCjOnc hopeof caUing, oncGod,onc FaithjoncBaptifmcwhy
haih he noc alfo inime Jiatly added one chiefe BiOiopjthar may hoI<i
the Church together in vnity?For nothinL',could hnuc bin more fit-*
ly fpoken, if it had bin true, Let that place be dihgenily weyed. It is
no dout but that he meant there altogether to rcprefcnt the holy 8c
fpirituali gouernment of the Church, which they that came after
called Hierarchic. As for Monarchy among minifters,hc not only na«
meth none, but alfo flieweth that there is none. It is alfo no dout but
y he meant to cxpreflc the mancr of coioyning, wherby the faithfull
cleaue together with Chrift iheir head. There he not only fpeaketh
of no minifteriall head, but appointeth to eucry of the mcbcrs a par-
ticular working according to y meafure of grace dillributed to euery
one. Neither IS there any rcafon why they (houlde futielly difputc of
thecomparifon ot the heauenly and earthly Hicrarchie. For it is not
fife to kno'v beyond meafure of it. Aijd in framing this gouernment
we muft follow no other figure, than the Lord himfelfe bath painted
out m his word.
1 1 Now although I graunt them an other thing,which they flial
neuer winnc by pi oote before fober men, that the fupremacy of the
Church was fo ft.iblilhcd m Peter , that it fhoulde alway remainc by
perpctuall fucccfrio:yct how wil they prouc,that his fcatc was (b pla-
ced at RomCjthat whofoeuer is Bilhop of that Cf^urcl^fhoulde be fct
cuer the whole world.-By what right do they binde this dignity to the
pi jce,which is giurrn without mention of placc?P-. ter(fay ihey)liucd
& died at Rome.What did Chrift himfelf;'Did not he,whilc he liued,
cxcrcifc his Billioprike, & in dying fulhll the office of Priefthoode.at i2>
Hierufalcm? The Prince of PaitorSjthc foueraignc Bifliop, the headc
of the church,couM not purchace honor to the place: & could Petcr^
that was farre inferior to him ^ Are not thefc follies more than chil-
dilliPChrift gaue the honor of fupremacy to PetenPctcr fate at Romej
iherfore he there placed the fee of Supremacy. By this reafonithe If- p,
raclites in old time might hauc fet the.fcatc of Supremacy in the dc- 5,
fcrt , where Mofes the chiefe Teacher and Prince of Prophets ei -.
ccuted his niiniftery and died.
II Let v$ fee howe trimly they rcafon. Peter ( fay they ) had<i«
the Supremacy amonge the Apofllcs : therefore the Church where
he fate ought to haue that priuilcgc. But where fate he firft ? At An-
tioch/r , fay they . Therefore the Church of Antiochc doth rightly
cUime tf> It felfe the fupremacy. They c6£e£[i|: thgut.wai in old time
•<uj4
Cap.^. Of the outward mcancs
the firft:but they fay^that in rcmouing thenfe, he remoued to Rome
the honor that he brought with him . For there is an Epiftle vndcr
I j.qne- '^c name of Pope Marccilus to the birtiops of Antioche , where he
fti.i. ca. (ayth thus:Petcrs fcate was ac the beginningc with you, which after-
ward by the Lordcs commaundcment was remoued hither . So the
Church of Antioche, which was ones the chiefe,hath giucn place to
the fee of Rome.But by what Oracle had that good ma lcarned,that
the Lordc fo commaunded ? For if this caufe be to be determined by
thelawjitis ncccflary that they anfwere, whether they will hauc thit
priuilege to be perfonall,or rcall, or mixt. For it mutt be one of thcfc
three.lfthey fay thatitis pcrfonaIl,thcn it bclongeth nothing to the
placc.If they fay that it is real. then when it i$ once giue to the place.
It is not taken away by reafon cither of the death or departure of the
perfon. It rcmaineth therefore that they mulifay itismixt ; but
then thapplacc (hal be not (imply to be conlidercd , vnlelfe the per-
fon do alfo agrce.Let them choofc which foeucr they will,! will by-
andl^ inferre and caHly proue, that Rome can by no meane take the
fuprcmacy vpon it fcife.
1 5 But be it, that as (they triflingly fay) the fupremacy was rcmo-
toed from Antioche to Rome:yct why did not Antioche keepc the fe-
cond placc?For if Rome haue therefore the firft place,bccaufe Peter
iate there to y end of his lifeito whom fhal tHe fccond place rather be
grauntedjihan where he had his firft feate?How came it to paffe th^t
that Alexandria went before Antioch?How jgreeth it, that y Church
of one difciplc fhould be aboue the feate of Pctcr?If honor bt due to
^ucry Church,accordingc toy worthines of y founder,whatfhaU we
fay alfo of the other Churches?Paul namsrh i.hree,thai femed to be
Gal.}.^ pillers, lames, Peter and lohn. If the fiift place were giuen to the fee
of Rome in the honor of Peter : do not the fees ofEphcfuSj&Hieru-
falcm,wherc lohn & lames fate,deferue the fccond & third placc?But
among the Patriarches Hierufalem had the latt place : Ephefus could
not fit fo much as in the vttermoft corner. And other Churches were
left outjboth all thofe that Paule founded,& thofe that the other A^
poftles were rulers of. The feate of Miarckc , which was but on e of
their difciples,obtaiBed the honor. Therfore they mufl either cofcflc
that that was a prepofterous order , or they muft graut vs that this is
not a pcrpetuall rule , that there be due to eucjry Church the fame de-
gree of honor which the founder had.
14 Howbcit,as for that which they report of Peters fitting in the
Church of Rome,I fee not what credit it ought to haue.Trucly that
which is in Eufcbius^hac Ik ruled theie fiae & twenty yeares^is v^ry
caftly
To Saluation. Lib.4, 4^J
eafily confuted. For it is cuidcnt by the firft and fccond Chapter to Gala, t.
the G.Uathians, that about twenty yeares after the death of Chrift, *?•
he was at Hieruralcm,and th.u then he went to Aniioche;whcrc how
long he was , is vncertainc. Gregory reckcneth feucn yeares,& Eu-
febuis twenty & Hue But fi om the death of ChriH.to the end of Nc*
rocs Empire , ( in whole time they fay y he wai flayne)there fliaibc
found but thirty and fcuen yeares. For the Lord fuffrcd vndcr Tibc-
riuSjihe eighteenth ycjre of his Empire. If you rebate twenty ycres»
duringe the which Paule is witnelTe that Peter dwelt at Hierufalem,
there will rcmayne but feuenty yeares at the moft,which muft nowc
be dcuidcd bctwcne two biihoprikes.If he taricd longe at Antioche
he couldc not fitte at Rome , but a very litle while . Which thinge
wc may yet alfo more plainely prouc . Paulc wrote to the Romines, Rom.i j
nvhcn he was in his iourney going to Hicruralem,wherc he was taken 15,
and fro thenfe brought to Rome. It is not likely that this Epifilc wat
written foure yeares btforc chat he came to Romc.Thercin is yet no
mentio of Peter, which (hould not hauc bin left out,if Peter had ru-
led that Church.Yea and in the end alfojwhcn he rehearfeth a great Roni.iC
number of the godly, whom he biddcthto be falutcd,wherc verily he *•
gathereth together all thofc y he knew, he yet fay th vtierly nothing
of Peter.Ncichcr is it ncdcful iicrc to make a long or curious demo*
ftration to rtien of foundc iudgemeni:for the matter it felfe, and the
wliolc argument of the EpilHc crieth out,that he (hould not haue a*
uerpafTed Peter,if he had bin at Rome.
1 5 Then Paule was brought prifoner to Rome . Luke reportcth Aa,Iaft
that he was receiucd of the brethren,of Peter he fayih nothmg. He «^.
wrote from thenle to many Chuiches:& in fome places alfo he wry-
ceth falucatios in the names of certaine: but he doth not in one word
ihcw that Peter was there at that time. Who, I pray you (hall thinke
it likely, that he could haue pafltd him ouer with filence,if he had bin
prefenirYea to the Philippians,where he fayd that he had none that p. ...
Co faithfully looked vnto the worke of the Lord,as Timothee,he c6
t«
20.
plained that they did all feekc their ownc. And to the fame Timoihec ».Tim^
be maketh a more grieuous c6plaint, that none was with him at his »^
firft defen fe , but all forfooke him : where therefore was Pcrer then?
For if they fay that he was then at Rome , howe great a fhame doth
Paul charge him with,y he wasa forfaker of the Gofpcl?For he fpea-
keth of the belcuersibecaufc he addeth, God impute it not vnro the*
How long therfore,& in what time did Peter kepe that featc ? But it it
a constant opinion ofwri'ers,thathe gouerncdthat Church cuento
bis death. But amonge the wryccrs chcmfclucs it ii not ccrtaioc wh»
N
Gap.^. Of the outward mcancs
•^ was his fucccflbrjbecaufe fome fay Linus,& otber feme fay Clementif
And they tell many fond fables, of the difpucation had betwene him
J 8 * & Simon the magician. And Auguiiine fticketh not to confefl~e,whcn
' he cntrcatcth of Superftitions , that by rcafon of an opinion ralheJy
eonceiuedi thcrcwasacuftomegro-ven in vfc at Rome, that they
(hould not faft that day that Peter got the vidory of Simon the ma-
gician.Finally tiic doings of that time arc fo entangled with diuci ficy
of opinions , that wc ought not rafhly to belcise where we finde any
thing written. And yet by reafon of this cofeuc of writers,! ftriue not
againft this,thathc died there:but yet that he was Bifhop there, and
fpecially a long time.I can not be pcrfwadedjneithcr do I much paflc
Vp6 that alfo:fora(much as Paul teftificth that Peters Apoftlelhip did
peculiarly belonge to the Iewes,and his owne to vs. Therefore that
that fclowfliip which they couenanted betwene ihemfclues,m3y be
confirmed with vs, or rather that the ordinance of the holy Ghoft
may ftand in force amonge vs,we ought to haue refpcd rather to the
Apottlefhip of Paul than of Peter.For the holy Ghoft fo diuided the
prouinces bcwene them , that he appointed Peter to the lewes, and
Paul to vs. Now therefore let the Romaniftes go and feeke rhtir fu-
prcmacy elfe where than in the word of God, where it is founde not
to be grounded.
16 Now let vs come to the olde Church,that it may alfo be made
to appcare plainely, y our aduerfaries do no Jelfe cau{cleily,& falfely
boaft of the confent ihcrof, than they do of the witncfTc of the word
of God. When therfore they brag ot that principlr of theirs,rhat the
rnity of the Church can not otherwifc be kept together, but if there
be one fupremc head in earth,to whom al the members may obcy,&
that therfore the Lord gaoe the fupremacy to Peter, and from thenfe
forth to the fee of Rome by right of fucceflion,that the fame fhoulde
remainc in it to the cndrthey affirmc,that this hath bin aiway obfer-
ued from the bcginning.But forafmuch as they wrongfully wrcfl ma-
ny teftimonres.I wil firft fay this aforehand, that I deny not but that
the olde wryters do ecbe where giuc great honor to the Church of
Rome, & do fpcake reuerently of it. Which I thinke to be done fpe-
cially for three caufes. Fory fame opinion, which I wot not how wa»
growen in force , that it was founded & ordained by the miniftery of
Pcier,much auailed to procure fauour & eftimatio vnto it. Therfore
in the Eaft parts it was for honors fake called the fee Apoftolikc.Se-
condly,whcn the heade ofthe Empire was there, & that therefore it
was likely,that in y place were men more excellent both in learninge
& wirdom,&$kil,& experience of many tbings^ihan any where elfe:
there
To Saluation. Lib.4. 4<^'^
ehcre was worthily conruicration had therot^that both the honor c^
the ciiic , and alfo the other more excellent giftes of God (houlde*
not iccme to be dcfpifed. There was belidc thcfc alfo aihird thmgc,
that when the Churches of the Ealt,and of Grccia,yca & of Aftrica,*
were in tumultes among thcmfclues with difai'^rcracntcs of opinions,
the Church of Rome was cjuietcr & lelVe full of troubles tha the reft.
So came it to pafle.thar the godly & holy B«fliops,beinec driuen ooc
of their featcs, did oftentimes flee thiihcr as inro a Sanftuary or ccr*^
taine haucn.For as the Wcftcrnc men arc ofleflTc fh.irpencs & fwift-j
nes of witjihan the Alians or Africans be,fo much arc they leflc dc«
(irous of alteratios This rhcrforc added much authority to y Church f
of Rome,that in thofe doucful times it was no fo troubled as the reft;*
& did holdc the dodnnc once deliucrcd them, fader tha all the reft'
as we fhal byandby better dcclarc.For thcfe ihrcecaufcs(l fay) it was
had in no fmall honor , & commended with many notable teftimo-
nies of theold wryters. i
17 But when our aduerfaries will thereupon gather that it hath a
fupremacie and foueraignc power ouer other Churches>they do too
much amilfcjas I haue already fayd. And that the fame may the bet-.
tcr appeare, I will firft briefly fhew what the olde fathers thought of
this vnity which they enforce fo earneftly. Hieromc, wryting to Nc-
potianus,aftcr that he had rccircd many example's of vnity,atthe laft
dcfccdcd to the Hierarchic of the Church, EchcBifhop ofcueryic-
ucrall ChurchjCchc Archprieft,cche Archdeacon,& all the ecclcfia-
fticall order, do reft vppon their owne rulers. Here a Romaine Pricft
fpeaketh.he commendcth vnity in the ecclcfiafticall ordcnwhy dotb
he not rehearfe ihar all Churches are knitte together with one hcade
as wirh one bondc? Nothing could haue more fitly fcrued the matter
y he had in h3nd:& it can not be fatd that it was for forgetfulnes,thaC
he omitted it:for he would haue done nothing more willingly ifthc
matter had fuffred him.He faw therforc without dout,that that is the
true rcfon of vnity which Ciprian excellently wcl dcfcribcth in thefc
wordsrThc biQioprike is one, whereof ech hath a p3rtwholly:& the Dc fim»
Church is one , which is with cncreafe of frutefulnefTe more largely ^ P*^*"
extended into a multitude. Like as there arc many funbcamcs & one
light.and many branches of a tree, but one body grounded on a faft
holding rooterand like as from one foun taine flow many ftrcames, 8c
though the multitude feme to be diuerfly fpread abroad with large-
ncifrc of ouerftowingc plenty,yet the vniiy is kept whole in the orit;i-
fialhfo the Church alfo being oucrfpread with the light of the Lord,
cxtcndeili her bcamcs abroad throughout y whole world^yct is it but
Cap.7. . Gfi the oiitwardifaclancs
one that is cch whief c pourcdforth, and the vnity 6t the body hndt
fcuercdrlhe fpreadeth her branches ot»ef rhe whole \vorlde,flie fen-:
dcthouc her ouerflowmgeftreamcs : yet is there but one heade and
Qne bepinningc &c. Afrei w;ud The fpoufe of Chnll can not be an
^idultreile : llie knowcth one onely houfcjlie keepeth the hohne flc
of one onely chamber with chart iTiiniefattneflcYou fee hov/ he ma*^
fccth the vniuerfall bifhopnkc to be Chnit onciy,\vhich comprehend
deth the whole Church rndcr him : and fayth that all they that ex*
«cute the office of bifhop vndcr this heade, baue their partes thereof
wholly. Where is the fupremacy of the fee of Rome, if the whole bi-
fhoprike reroainc with Chrift only,& ech bjfliop hath his part thcrof
wholly'rhefe things therefore make to this purpo(e,that the reader
roay vnderftande by the way, that the,olde fathers were vtterly igno-
rant of that principle, which the Romanrftes do take for confei3ed 5c
vndoutedjconccrning the viiity of an earthly bead in the Hierarchid
of the Church.
^^f> >,»-i, .;Thc vij. Chapter.
Ofthtbcgmnmgemdencreafinge of the Papacie of\ome^vntfltit
. aiuannted it felft to this height, whereby both the iibertj
tfthe Church hath bin opprejjedj andall the rght
gotternment thereof cuerthrevven.
AS concerning the auncicntneflfe of the fupremacy of the fee
of Rome, there is nothing had ofmorc antiquity to ftabJifho
it,rhanthatdei:rec of the Nicene Synode,whcrin the bilhop
of Rome both hath the firft place among the Ratriarches gi-
ucn vnto him, and is commaundcd to looke vnto the Churches ad-
ioyning to the city. Whc the CounccI maketh fuch diuifion betwene
him and the other Pattiarches , that it aflfigncthto euery one theii^
boundesitruely it dgth not appoint him the heade of ail,butmakcfhlr'
him one of the c4iicfc. There were prcfcnt Vitus and Vincenrius in
the name of lulius , which then gouerncd the Church of Rome : to
them was giuen the fourth place . I bcfeeche you, if lulius were ac-
knowledged the head of the Church, (hould his Legats be thruft into
the fourth fearer' Should Athanafius bechiefe in the Councel, where
principally the image of the Hierarchicall order ought to be feene ?
In the Synodeat Ephefusitappeareth, that Celcftinus which was
then bifhoppe of Rome, vfed a crooked futtle meane,to prouide for
the dignitie of bis featc . For when he fent his deputies thither , he
committed his Heedc to Cyrillus of Alexandria, which fhoulde not-
wiihftaruiirige otherwife haue bin chc chiefe • To what purpofe was
that
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 4^5
that fame commitung, but thac his name might by what mcane fo-
eucr abide in tlic firft place.For his Legates fate in a lower placcand
were asked their opinion among the rcft,& fubfcribed in their order:
in the' meanc time y Patriarch of Alexandria ioyncd Cclcftins name
with his ownc . What {hall I fay of the feconde councell at Ephcfus:
where when Leos Legates were prefent,yet Diofcorus Patriaichc of
Alexandria fate the chiefc as by his ownc right?! hey wil take excep-
tion that It was no vprighteouhcel,by which both the holy ma Fla-
utaniis was condemncd>& Eutychcs acquitcd,& his vngodhncs allo-
wed. But when the Synode was gathered, when tie Billioppes tookc
their places in order , vcriiy the Legates of the Bifhop of Pvotne fate
there among the rcl^ none oihcrwifc than in a holy & lawful Coun-
cclI.Yei they ttriued not for the firft place, but yeeldcd it to an oti cr:
which they wold neuer haue done,if they had thought it to be theirs
of right. For the Biihops of Rome were neuer artiamcd to enter into
the greatcft conteiions for their honors,& for this only caufe often-
times to vexe &llfcouble the Church with many and hurtfull ftriucs.
But bccaufe Leo faw that it fhoulde be a too much vnreafonablc rc-
<jueft,if he (hould feke to get the chiefc place for his Legates,thcrc-
iore he (iircefled It.
z Then folowcd y Councell of Chalcedon,in which by the graut
of the EmpeFOury Legates of the Church of Rome fate in the chiefc
place.But Leo himfelfe co^elTcth that this was an extraordinary pri-
uilcge. For whe he made pention for it to the Emperour Marcianus,
& Pulcheria the Empreflcjhc did not affirme that it was due to him,
but only pretendcd,that the Eaftcrne Bi{hops,which fate as chief in
the councel at Ephefus,troubled all things,& ill abufcd their power.
Wheras therfore it was nedeful to haue a graue gouernour, & it was
not likely that they fliould be mete for it,which had once bin fo light
& di(ordered:therfore he praied,that by realbn of the default & vn-
fitnefle of other, the office of gouerning might be rcmoued to him,
Truely that which is gotten by (ingular priuilcgc and bcfide order,is
not by common law.Whcrc this only is prec<^ded,that there nedeth
iome new gouernour,becaufe the former gguernours had behaued
themfelues ill,it is euident that it neither was fo before,nor ought to
cotinuc fo for euer,buc is done only in rcfpedof prefcnc dangcr.Thc
Bifhop of Rome therfore had the firft ptacc in the Councell at Chal-
cedon:not becaufc it was due to his fee, but bccaufe the S) node was
at that time deftitute of a graue and fit gouernour,whiIc they j ought
to haue bin the chiefe,did through their owne intemperance & cor-
rupt affcdio^ tbruii themfwlucs out of place And this that I (ay^Lcos
NNN
Cap./* Of the outwardmcanes
fuccclibur did in dedc prouc.For when he fcnt his Legates to the fift
SynoUc at Conftatinople, which was holdcn long time aftcr,hc brau-
led not for the iirft featc, but cafily fuffi cd Menna the Patriarchc of
Conftantinople to (Ttte as chicfc. So in the counccll at Carthagc,ac
which Auguftme was prcfcnt,wc fee that not the Legates of the fee
cfRomc,but Aurelius Archbifhop of that place fate as chieferwhcn
yet the contention was about the authority of the Bi{hop of Rome.
CO Jccll ^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^ ^^^^ ^ generall councel holdcn in Italy it fclfc,at which
ae Aqui f Bilhop of Rome was notprefent. Ambrofc was chicfc thcrc,which
Icia. was in very great authority with the Empcrour , there was no men*
tionmadeofthcBilhopof Rome. Therefore at that time it came to
paQe by the dignity of Ambrofe,that the fee of Millain was more no-
ble than the fee of Rome.
J As concerning the title of fupremacyjand other titles of pride,
whcrupon it now marueloufly bofteth it felfc,it is not hard to iudgc,
Eft whe & in what fort they crept m.Ciprian oftentimes makcth mcmio
& lib.4. of Cornelius.He fettcth him out with no other namMbut by the name
Epift.6. of brother,or felow bi{hop,or felow in ofHce.But when he writeth to
Stephen the fucceflbr of Cornelius,he doth not only make him egal
with himfelfe & the reft,but alfo fpeaketh more hardly to him,char-
ging him fomctime with arrogance, fomtimc with ignorancc.Sincc
Ciprian we haue what all the Church of Affrica iudgcd of that mat-
Cap.47. ter. The Councell at Carthage did forbid that any (houldc be called
Prince of PricftSjorchiefe Bidiopjbutonlybifliopofthe chiefefec.
But if a man turne ouer the auncienter monumentes,hc ftial find that
the bifhop of Rome at that time was content with the comon name
of brother.Ccrtainly (o long as the face of the Church cotinued true
& pure,all thefe names of pridcjwherc with fincc that time the fee of
Rome hath begon to waxe ourngious,werc vtterly vnheard of:it was
not knovven,what was the hieft bilhop,& the only head of the church
in earch.But if the btfhop of Rome had bin fo bold to hatre take fuch
a thin^ vpan hJmjthere were ftout & wife men that wouldc haue by*
&by rcprefled his foly.Hierom forafmuch as he was a pricft at Romc»
was not ill wiiiino to (qi out the dignity of his owne Church,fo much
Epi.ad as the matter & (hte of the tinvc fufrTedryet we fee how he alfo brin-
Euag. geth it downe into felowfhip with the reft. I f authority (fay th he) be
foa:htfor,the world is preater tha a city. Why dbeft thou alleage to
me the cuftome of one city? Why docft thou defend fmalnes of nu-
bcr,out of which hath growc pridc,againft the lawes of the Church ?
Whtrefocuer therebeabtlhop, eitheratRomejOr atEugubium,or
at ConftauLiiiople,or at Rhcgium, he is of ihciamc mcritc & of the
fame
To Saluation. Lib.4. ^66
feme Pricfthoode. The power of richcfle or balencs of poucrty ma-
kcth not a bidiop hicr or lower.
-4 About the title of vniucrfal bifhop the contention firft began in
the time of Gregory ,which was occalioni d by the ambition of lohn
bifhop ofCoftantinoplf.For hc(which thing neuer any man before
bad attempted) would iniue m.idc himlclfe vniuerfall bifhop. In that L'b.4.
contention Grcgorie doth not allcage that the right is taken away ^' '7'
which was due to himfelfc:buc ftoutly crkth our aga^nft it,that it is a j,^ ^y
proph3nename,yeaful of facrilege,yeathc foicwarnerof Aniichrift.gullo.
The whole Church(faytli he)falltth downe from her ftate,if he fall, ^^^^i-
which is called vniuerfall. In an otht r place : It is very forowcfull,to S?',.*?'
fuffcr j>3cicntly,that our brother and fclow bifhopydefpifing all other, ^j^^ ^^
{hould only be named Bifliop.Rut in rhis his pride what cU is bctokc- guft*.
ned but y times of Antichnft nerc at hand?becaufc verily he foloweth Lib. 4
him,th3t delpifing the felowfbip of AngeU,went abonut to dimbe vp fp''**^'
to the toppe of Angularity. In an oticr place he wryteth to Eulolius
of Al(:xandria,and Anjftalius of Aatioch. None of my prcdecefiors
at any timcwoulde vjcthat prophanc wordrforif one be called vni-
uerfall Patriarchjthe name of Patriarches is abated from the reft. But
farrc may this be from a cht iftian minde,that any fhouldc hauc a will
to take that vpon him,whcrby he mav m any part, be it neucrfo litle, lib. 4.
diminifh the honor of his brethren. To confcnt in this wicked word ^P'^'T
is nothing elfc but to lef the faith. It is one thing(fayth hc)that we ^"*^"*^
owe to the preferuing of the vnity of faith , and an other thmge that p^
we owe to the kcping downe of pndc.But I (ay it boldly jbccaufc who Lib.7.
foeuer callcth himfelfe or deiireth to be called vniuerfall bilhopjhc ^P'- * -
doth in his proude aduacitig runne before Antichrifl,becaufe he doth ^^"".^
with ftiewing nimfelfe proude preferre himfclft aboue the reft. Again LjJj g
to Anaftafius bifhop of Alexandriatl haue fayd that he can not haue cpi. 1 8
peace with vs,vnleflc heamedcd the aduancingof the fuperftitioui
& proude wofd,which the Hrft j^poftata hath inuctcd. Aod(to fpcake
nothing of the wrong done to your honor)if one be called vniuerfal
BiQiopjihc vniuerfal Church fallcth when that vniuerfal one fallcth.
But whereas he writeth, that this honor was ofFred to Leo in the Sy-
node at Chalced6,it hath no colour of truth. For neither is there any
fuch thing red in the ades of that Synode. And Leo himfelfe,which
with many Epiftlcs impugncth y decree there made in honor of the
fccof Conftantinopl", without dout would not hauc pafTcd ouer this
trgumctjwhich had bin moft to be hked of al othcr,if it had bin true,
that he reftifcd that which was giuen him:& beingc a man ochcrwtfe
too much de(irouj o£honor,hc wouldc not haue omitted that which
NNN ij
Cap./. Oftheoutwardmcancs
Blade for his prarfc.Thcrforc Grcgoric was <Iecciucd in this,thathe
thought that that title was offered to the fee of Rome by the Synodc
atChalcedonrio fpeakc nothinge,how fondc itis,thathe both tefti-
Libr. 4. fieth It to haue proceeded from the holy Synode, & alfo at the fame
£pi.7^. time called it wicked,prophane,abhominable,proude3& folloffacri-
I lcgc,yea deuifed by the deuiD,& publifhed by the crier of Antichrift,
And yet he addcrh that his predeceflbrrcfufedit, leaftall Prieftcs
lib 7 ^*^"^^ ^^ depriued of their due honor,when any thing were priuatly
cpi. 7^* giuen to one. In an other place : No man at any time hath willed to
be called by that word:No ma hath taken to himfclfe that prcfump-
tuous name:Icaft if he fhould in the degree of bifhopnke take to him
fclfc a glory of fingularity,hc fhould e fccmc to haue denied the fame
to all his brethren.
' f NowIcometothciurifdKfiiOjwhichthcbifhopofRomeaffir-
meth that he hath ouerall Churches,! know how great contentions
haue bin in olde time about this matter:For there hath bin no time
wherein the fee of Rome hath not coueted to gettc an Empire ouer
other Churches . And in this place it fhali not be out of feafon , to
fearch by what meancs it grew then by Iitle & litle to force power.I
do not yer fpeake of that infinite Empire,vvhich it hath not fo long a-
go taken by force to it felfe;for we wil differrc that to a place conuc-
nient.But here it is good to (hew briefly, how in old time & by what
meanes it hath aduaunccd it felfc , to take to it felfe any power oucr
other Churches . When the Churches of the Eafl were diuided and
troubled with the fadions of the Arrians vnder the Emperours,C6-
ftantius & Conftans the fonncs of Conftaniinc the Great, & Atha-
nafius the chiefe dcfendour there of the true faith was driuen out of
his fee:fuch calamity compelled him to come to Rome,th3t with the
authority of the fee of Rome he might both after a fort rcpreffe the
rage of his enemies, & coufirmc the godly that were in diftrelfe. He
was honorably receiued of luUus then Bifhop,and obtained that the
Bifhopsofthe Weft tookc vpon the the defence of his caufe.Thcr-
fore when the godly ftoodc m great ncdc of foreinc ayde, & faw that
there was very good fuccour for them in the Church of Rome, they
willingly gaiie vnto it the moft authority that they could.But all that
was nothingclfe,but that the communion thereof fliould be hiely c-
fteemed,& it fhould be compted a great fhame,to be excommunicare
of it.Afterward cuill and wicked men alfo added much vnto it.For,to
efcape lawefull iudgementcs, they fled to this fanduary.Thereforc if
any prieft were condemned by his Bifliop,or any Bifhop by the Synod
of his prouince^thcy byandby pppclkd to Rome. And the Bifliops of
Rome
ToSaluation. Lib.4, 4<^7 '
Rome receiucd fuch appcllvUios more grcdily iha was mctcrbccauic
itrecmcd to be a forme of extraordinary power , fo ro cntcrmcdlc
with matters farrc & wide abour them. So when Eutychcs was con-
demned by Flauianus Bifliop of Conftantinople , he complained to
Leo that he had wrongc done vnto him. Leo without delay, no IclTc
vndifirfcteiy the fudcniy, tooke in hand the defence of an cud caule:
he gricuoufly inucycd againft Flauianu5, as though he had,without
hearing the caufcjCondcmned an mnocent:and by tnis his ambition
he caufed that the vngodlincfl'c of Eutyches was for a certainc fpacc
of time ftrcngthencd. In Aftrica it is euidcnt y this oftecimes chaun-
ccd-For fo foonc as any lewd man had taken a foile in ordinary iadge-
rnentjhe byandby ftew to Rome, and charged his countrccmcn with
many Iclaudcrous report$:& the fee of Rome was alway ready to en-
tcrmedle. Which lewdnes compelled the bifliops of Aflfrica romnke
a law,ihat none vnder painc of cxcomraunication fhould appellc be-
yond the Tea.
6 But whatfocuer it were,lcttc v$ fee what authority or power the
fee of Rome then had.Ecclcliafticall power is contained in thele four
pointes,ordcringe of Bifhops, fummoning of Councclsjhearmgc of
Appeallcs or iurifdidion , Chaftilinge admonitions or cenfurcs. All
the old Synodes commaund Biiliops to be confccrate by their ownc
Metropolitancs:and they neucr bid the birtiop of Rome to be called
vnto it, but in his ownc Patnarchie. But by htle and litle it grcwc in
vfcjthat all the Bifliops of Italy came to Rome to fetche their confc-
cration.exccpt the Mecropolitans,whith fuffrcd notthemfelues to be
brought into fuch bondage : but when any Metropohtane was to be
confccrate, the bifhop of Rome fent thither one of his pri£fts,which
(hould only be prcfcnt,but not prefidcnt.Of which thinge there is an ^^. ^
example in Gregorie:attheconfccration of Conftantius Bifhoppe of cpi, 6i
Millain after the death of Laurence . Howebeit I do not thinke that & 70. ,
that was a very auncient inilitution : but when at the bcginninge for
honor & good wils fake they fent one to an other their Legatcs,to be
witnefTes of the confecration , and to teftifie their communioft with
them,afterward that which was voluntaryjbegan to be holden for n<-
ceflary. Howfocucrit be, it is euidcnt that in olde time the Btfliop.^f
Rome had not the power of confecratingibut in the prouince of his
owne Patriarchic.that is to fay in the Churches adioining to the city,
^i the canon of the Niccne Synode fayih. To the Confecration was
annexed the fending of a Synodicall Epiftlc,in which he was nothing
aboue the reft.por the Patriarchcs were wont immediatly after their
conTecuuoniby foicmne wrvcingc to dechre their fayth , whereby
NNN iij
Cap.7- Of the outward meancs
they profdTed that they fubfcnbed to the holy & catholickc Coon-
celVes. So,rendringe an accompt of their Fayth,they didde approue
themfelues one to an oihei- . If the bilhoppe of Rome had itcciuedf
of other, and not himfelfe giuen this confcflion , he hadde thereby
/„'* bin acknowledged fuptrior: but when he was no lelfe bound to giue
.)b 6. if jthan to require it of other, and to be fubied to the common lawc:
jrpi i6^ cruely that was a token ofFclow(liip,not ofdominion.Ofrhis thingc
ij^lib I. c. there is an example m Grcgones Epiftlc to Anaitafius and to Cyria-
l^piit. i4. ^yj of Conftannnoplc , and m other places to ail the Patriarches to-
gether.
7 Then follow admonitions or cenfures:whicb as in old time the
bifhopsofRomcvfed coward other,fotliey did aeaine fuffer themof
other.lreneus grieuoufly reproued Vidorjbecaufe he vndifcretly for
a thing of no vsluc,troublcd the Church with a pernicious diffentio;
Vidor obeied, and fpurned not againlt u. Such a hberty was then in
vre among the holy bilhopSjChatthey vfed a brotherly authority to-
ward the bifhop of RomCjin admonilhing and chaftifingc him if he at
any time offended He ag.iine,when occafion requircd,did admoniihe
other of their duety:& if there were any fault,rebuked it.For Cypria,
when he exhorteth Steph n ro admoniOi the bifhoppcs of Fraunce,
fctcheth not his argumet from the greater power, but from the com-
mon right that pricftes hauc among themfelues. I bcfeech you,if Stc-
^phen had the bin ruler ouer Fraunce, v.ould not Cyprian haue faid:
Epi. I *, Rf ftt'sine ihero,becaufc they be thine ? but he fiyth fan c otherwifc.
lib. J. 'This(rciythhe)tne brotherly felowllup,whcrewith wc be bound one
■A^i to an other requireth that we fhould admonifh one an other. And wc
pop. CO fee ajf^a with how great iharpnes of words he being other wife a man
Srci^la ^^^ mild nature inueyethagainft Stephen himfelfe,whche thinketh
him to be too infolcnt Thcrforc in this behalfe alfo there appeareih
not yer,y the bilhop of Rome had any iurifdiftion ouer the that were
norof his owne prouince.
3 As concerning the calling together of Synodes,this was the of-
fice 6rf cuery Metrqpolitanc, at certaine appointed times to afTcmblc
•a Pfo'ififlciall Synode. There the bi(hop of Rome had no authority.
^^But a Gencrall councel the Emperour only might fummon.For if any
Mof the bi{hoppes had attempted it,not only they that were out of his
|>roumce,wbuld not hauc obeyed his flall»ng,but alfo there would by-
andby hauc rifen an vprore.Therforc the Emperor indifferently war-
ned them all fo be prefent.Socrates in dcdc reporteth.ihat lulius did
Tripar. Cf populate with the bifhops of the Eaft , btcaufe they called him not
hift.li.4 to the Synode of Anciocb, whereas it was forbidden by the Canons,
that
To Saluation. Lib.4. ^6S
that any thing (houlde be decreed without the knowledge of the Bi-
friop of Rome.But who doth not ice that this is to be vnderftanded
of fuch decrees as bindc the whole vniucrfal Church? Nowc it is no
maruel,if thus much begrauntcd both to y antiquity & honor of the
city,& to the dignity of the feejthat there fliould be no generall de-
cree made of rcligion,in the abfence of the bifhop of Rome, if he rc-
fufe not to be prcfent.But what is this toy dominion oucr the whole
Church ? For we deny not, that he was one of the chiefe.but we will
4K>t grauntjthat which the Romanises now afhrme,that he had a do-
minion oucr all.
9 Now remaincth the fourth kind of power, which ftadeth in ap«
pealles. It is euident that he hath the chicfe power, to whofc iudgc-
ment fcatc appellation is made. Many oftentimes appclled to the Bi-
fhop of Rome:and he himfcife alfo went about to draw the hcaringc
of caufcs to himrclfc:but he was alway laughed to fcorne,whe he paf*
fed hisowneboundes. I will fpeake nothing of the Eaft and ofGrc-
cia;but it is certainc that the bifliops of Fraunce ftoutly withftoodc
him , when he feemed to take to himfelfc an empire ouer them. In
AfTnca there was longc debate about that matter . For where at the
Mileuitanc CounceKl, at which Auguftine was prefent,they were ex-
communicate that appelled beyond the feaithe biftiop of Rome tra-
uailed to bringc to paflcjthat that decree might be amended. He fenc
his legates to fhevv that that priuilcge was giuen to him by y Nicene
.Councell.The Legates brought foorth theafts of the Nicene Cou-
ccll , which they hadde fetched out of the ftoiehoufe of their ownc
Church. The AfFricans withftoode ir,and denied that the bifliops of
Rome ought to be credited in their owne caufc:and fayd that there-
fore they would fend to Conftantinoplc, & into other cities of Gre-
cia,where copies were to be had y were IcflTe fulpicious. It was foud,
that therein was no fuch thing writien,as the Romains had preteded.
So was y decree confirmcd,which tooke the chiefe hearing of caufes
from the bifhop of Rome;In which doing the lewde {hamelefnefl'e of
the BiHioppc of Rome himfelfc appeared. For when he guilefully did
thruft in the Synod e at Sardos in Ifedc of the Nicene Synode,he was
fhamefully taken in amanifeftfalfehoode.But yet greater and more
fhamelcflc was their wickednefle, that added aforgedEpiltletothc
Counccll,whcrein I wotc not what bifhoppe of Carthage, condem-
ringe the arrogance of Aurehus his prcdeceflbur > for that he was Co
bold to withdraw himfelfe from the obedieceofthc fee Apoftohke,
and ycldinge himfelfe & his Church,humbly craueth pardon.Thcfe
be the goodly moaumenccs of anticjuity > whereupon the maicfty of
NNN iiij
Cap./. Of the outward mcancs
the (ce of Rome is founded, while they fo childiflicly lycvndcr the
pretence of Antiquity,that very bhnde men may findc it out by gro-
pinge. Aurelius (fayth he) puffed vp with deiiehftie boldcncffc and
ftubbornne(re,rebciled agamft Chrift, and faint Peter, and therforc
I to be condemned with curfe.What fayd Auguftmef'But what fayd Co
many fathers that were prefcnt at the Milcuitane Counccl^But what
necde is it to fpende many woi dcs in confuting that fooliili writing,
j which the Romaniftes themftlues, if they haue any face left,c3n not
' a.cjueft. looke vpon without great fname? So Gratian,! can not tell whether
■ "P«4« of mahce or of ignorance,whe: e he rchcarfcd that decree,that thcf
{houlde be excommtmicatc th<Jt appelle beyondc the fea, addcth an
exception: VnlelTeparaduenturc they appelle to the fee of Rome.
What may a man do to thefe beafte$,which are fo voide of common
reafon,that they except that only thing out of y lawjor whofe caufe
cuery man feeth that the lawe was made f For the Counccll when it
condcmneth appellcs beyond the fca,forbiddcth only this,that none
Ihould appelle to Rome. Here the ^ood expoficor cxcepteth Rome
out of the common law.
lo BuT(to dctermmc this queftion at oncc)onchiftory{hal make
plainc whatmanerofiurifdidio the bi(hopofRomchad mold time.
Donate of the blackc houies had acculed Cecilian biHioppc of Car-
thage. The man accufcd was conciemned, his caufe not heardc. Fof
when he knew that the bifhops had confp • ed again!) him,he would
not appearc. Then tijc matter camcto the Emperour Conftantinc.
He, forafmuch as he willed to haue the matter ended by ccclefiafti-
call iudgemcnt,committed the hearinge of it toMtlciades billiop of
Rome.To whom he adioyned felow commiffioners many bifhops of
Italy, Fraunce and Spainc . If that belonged to the ordinary iurifdi-
dion of the fee of Romc,to hcare an appclie in an ccclefiaftical caufe:
why doth he fufter other to be ioyncdwith him at the will of the
Emperour ? Yea why did he himfelfc take the iudgement vppon hini
rather by the Empcrours commaundement, than by his owne office?
Auguft. But let vs hearc what hapned afterward.Therc Cecilian got y vidory.
cpi.i6 1 Donate of the blackeboufes was condcned for fdaudcr : he appelled:
Conftantinc comitted the iudgement of y appclie toy bifhop of Or-
lea nee He fate as iudge,to pronounce what he thought,after the bi-».
fhop ofRome.Ifthefce of Rome hath y chief power without appcl-
Iaii5:why doth Melciades (uffer himlelf to rcceiue fo great a fhame, f
j bifhop of Orlcancc (hould be preferred aboue him? And what Em -
peror doth this?cue Conftantinc of whom they boaft y he employed
hot only al his cndcuor,but in a mancr al the tichciTe of the empire tq
cncreafe
ToSaluation. Lib4, 4^p
encreafc the dignitie of their fee. Wc fe therefore nowc ,howc far re
the bilhop of Rome was at that time by all meanes from that fu-
prcmc domin JO, which he affirmeth to be geucn vnto him by Chrift
ouer all Chinches, and which he licngly fay eth that he hath in all
ages pofleflcd by the confent of the whole world.
It I knowe hovve many epiftlcs there be , howc many writing*
and decrees, wherm the biOiops do gcue much,and boldly chalcngc
much vnto it. But this alib all men that haue but a very little wit and
.Icrning do knowc , that the moft part of thofe are fo vnfauerie, that
by the 6rlt talk of them a man may foonc Hnd out of what Hiop they
•came. For what man of founde wit and fobrc , \ -ill thinke that that
goodly interpretation is Anacletus his ownejWhich is in Gratian re- Dfft. i
ported vnder the name of Anacletus : that is,that Cephas is a head? <^^V'^''
The Romanifts do at this d^y abufe for defence of their fee , many ^'^^^^^
fuch trifles , which Gratian hath patched together without iudgc-
xnent : and yet ftill in fo great light they will fell fuch lmokcs,whcrc-
wirh in olde time they were wont to mocke out the ignorat in darkc-
jBefle. But I will not beftowe much labor in confuting thofe things,
which do openly contute themfclues by reafon of their vnfauory
folie.I graunt that there remain alio true epiftlcs of the olde biihop.%
jvhcrin they fct forth the honor of their fee with glorious titles : of
which fort are fomc epiftles of Leo.Fbr that man, as he was learned Vide t
and eloquent , Co was he abb aboue meafurc dcfirous of glory and P'^** :
jdominion : but whether the Churches then belcued his tcftimonic ^P*'*^
when he fo aduanced himfelfe , that in decde is it that is in contro -
uerfic. But it appereth that many offended with his ambition , did
alfo withflad his grcdic dtfire.Somctimcs he appointed in his Ikede
the bilhop of Thetfalonica throughout Grecia and other countrees
adioining ; fometime he appointed the bilhop of Orleance, or fomc
x)ther throughout Frauncc. So he appointed Hormifdas bifhop of
Hifpalis to be his vicar in Spain, but eucry where he cxcepteth, that
he geueth out fuch apointements vpon this condition,that the Me-
tropolitans may hauc their auncient priuileges remaining fafcand
whole. But Leo himfelf dcclareih,that this is one of their priuileges,
.that if any dout happen about any matter, the Metropolitape Ihould
fifft be af ked his aduifc.Therefore thofe appointemcnts of vicars in Epift<%
Ills flcede were vpon this condition , that neither any bifhop fhonld '*
be letted in his ordinary iurifdidio, nor any Metropolitane in bem^
^udgc of Appeallesjnor any prouincial Counccl in ordering of their
Churchei. What was chisels but to abfteinc from all iurifdi<^ion:
i>ttK CO enccrmcdle co the appca^ng of difcordcs , oncly Co farrc as
Cap.7. Of the outwardc mcancs
the lawc ahd nature of the communion of the Church fufFreth.
iz In Grcgoriestjme that awncicnt order was already much
changed. For when the Empire was {hakcn,& torne in peeces, when
Fraunce and Spainc were afflji^ed with many ouci throwcs receiucd,
Slauonia wafted , Italic vexed, and Africa in a manerdeftroycd with
continuall calamities : that in (o great a Hiakinge of ciuil a^aires, at
Icaft the integritie of faith might remaine , or yet not vtterly perifli,
all the bifhops from cche part did the rather ioine thcmfeluc* to the
bifKop of RoTne.Thcreby it came to pafTe/hat not only the dignity,
but alfo the power of that fee greatly encrcafed. Howebeit I do not
fomuchpaflc bywhatmeanes it was brought about. Truely itap-
pearerh that it was then greater than in the ages before. And yet it
then greatly differed from being an vnbridlcd dominion , that one
man might bcarc rule oucr other after his owne will. But the fee of
Rome had thi« reucrence , that it might with her auihoritic fubdue
andrepreflc the lewdc and obftinate that coulde not by the other
bifhops be kept within their dutic.For degoric deth oftentimes di-
ligently teflify thisjthat he doth no lefTe faithfully preferue to other
men their rightes, than he recjuireth his owne of thcm.Neithcr do I
Y a (^**f^ ^0 packed on by ambition , plucke from any man that which
^j' * is his right : but I defire in all things to honor my brcthren.There is
no faying in his writings wherin he doth more proudely boft of the
libr.i. largeneflfc of his Supremicie , than this : I knowc not what bifhop is
EpLvIt. not fubicdto the fee Apoftolike when he is foundc in faultc. But he
'*V* '• by and by adioincth,Where fault requireth not, all according to the
•P** ^' order of humilitic arc egall. He geucth to hirhfelfe power to correct
them that hauc offended t if all do their dutie , he maketh himfeifc
egall with the reft.But he himfclfe geueih himfeifc this power : and
they affentcd to it that would:and other that like d it not, might frely
gainefay it, which it is well knowen that the moft parte of them did.
BcHdethat he fpeaketh thereof the Primate of Conftantinoplc:
which when he was condemned by the prouinciall Synodc , refufed
the whole iudgement. His fcllowc bifhops informed the Empcrour
of this ftubborneflc of him. The Empcrour willed Grcgoric to be
iudge of the caufe.Wc fee therforc that he both attenpteth nothing,
whereby he may breake the ordinary iurifdi<5tion,and the fame thing
that he doth for the helping of other j he doth not but by the com**
maundcment of the Empcrour.
X } This therforc was then all the poVvcr of the bifhop of Rome,
to fet himfclf againft obftinate & votamed heds,when there needed
any cxtraordinaiy remedy ; and that (o hdpc 9c not tP hinder other
biihops.
To Saluation. Lib.4.. 476
bifhops. TheretorclK takcchnomorc to himfclfc oucr all other, ^i^ru
than in an other place he grauntcth to all other ouer himfclfe,whcn P'"**
he confcfleth that he is ixrdy to be correded of all,to be amended of toi.i^,
all. So in an other place he doth in deede commaundc the bifliop of
AcjUileia to come toRome, to pleadehis caufe in a controucrfy of
faith that was nfen betwccne him and other : but he doth not com-
maundc him of hisowncpower jbut becaufc the Emperor had To
commaunded . Neither doth he gcue warning that he alone IhjJbc
iudee , but promifed that he will alfcmblc a Synodc by whom the
whole matter may be ludged. But although there was yet fuch mo-
deratiojthat the power of the fee of Rome had herccrtamc bounds,
which it might not palle , and the bifliop of Rome himfelfe was no
more abouc than vnder othenyet it appcarqth howe much Gregory I ibf.u
mifli iced fuch iiatc. For he nowc and then complaincth ,that vndcp *P*•^
color of biihoprike he was brought backc to the world: and that
he w?s more entangled with earthly cares ,chan eucr he had ferucd
them while he was a lay man : that he wai m that honor opprellcd
with tumult of worldly affaires. In an other plate : fo great burdens I'br.f,
(faith he) of bulinelfedohoJde medowne ,thatmy mindecanno- *P'"-7«
thing at all be railed vp to things aboue.I am fliake with many waues * ^
pf caufcs : and after thofe leifures of reft I am tofi'cd with tempi ftcs
of troublefomelifc:(bthat Imny rightly lay, I am come mtoy depth
of the fesjind the tempefte hath drowned me. Hereby gather, what
he would hnuc fayed , ifhe had happened to be in thefc times. Al-
though he fulfilled not the office of a Paftor,yc t he was doing it.ffe
abftcjned from the gouernmcnt of the ciuil Empire , and confcfl'cd
himfelfe to be fubie<5t ro the Emperor as other were. He did not
thruft himfelf into the cure of other Churches, but being compelled
by ncccffiiie. And yet he thinketh himlelfe to be ma maze, becaufc
he can not apply himfelfe altogether onely to the office of a biiliop.
14 At thit lime the biffiop of Conftantinople ftriued with the
bifhop of Rome for the Supremicie,as it is already faid.For after that
the feat of the Empire wasftablillicdatConftantinople,themaicfty
of the Empire fcemed to require ,that that Church alfo (hould haue
the feconde place of honor after the Church of Rome. And truely at
the beginning , nothing more auailed to caufe the Supremicie to be
<^eucn to RomCjbut becaufc the hed of the Empire was there at that
time.There is in Gratian a writing vnder the name of Pope Lucinus, Dift 99
where he faith,that cities were no otherwife diuided, where Metro- Cap. 6.
pohtanes and Primates ought to fit , than by the reafon of the ciuil
goucrnment that was bcfoi:e*Thcrc is alfo an other ?ndcr the name
Cap.y. Of the outwardc mcancs
of Pope Clement, where he faith , that Patiiarches were ordainedtn
ihofe cities that had had the chefe Flamines in the. Which,ahhougii
it be falfc , yet is taken out of a truth. For it is certaine, that, to the
cnde there (houldbe made as litle change as might be,the prouinccJl
were diuided according to the ftaie oi thinges that then were : and
that Primates and Metropohtanes were fet in thofe cities ihat ex-
celled the other in honors and power. Therefore in the Councell at
Cap.i. Taurinu it was decreed, that thofe cities which in the ciuile gouern-
fnent where the chicfe cities of euery prouince , (hould be the chefij
fcesof bifhops. And if it happened the honor of the ciuile goucrn-*
ment to be rcmoued from one citic to an other , that then the right
of the Metropolitanc citic (hould therewithal! be remoucd thether.
But Innocentius bifhop of Romc,when he fawc the auncient dignity
of his citie to growc in decay,afier that the featc of the Empire was
remoued to Conftantinople,fearing the abacement of his fee^mads
a c^^ntrary lawe : wherein he denicth it to be neceffary that the ec*
cleHailicall mother cities (liould be changed as the Impcriall mother
cities change. But the authoritie of a Synode ought of right to be
preferred abouc one mans fentence. Alfo we ought to fufpeftc In-
nocentius himfelfe in his owne caufe. Howcfoeuer it be , yet by his
owne prouifo he flieweth,that from the beginning it was fo ordered^
that the Metropolitane cities (hould be difpofed according lo the
outwardc order of the Empire.
Socrat. ' t According to this auncient ordinance , it was decreed in the
hif. tri- firft councell at Conftantinople , that the bi{hop of the citic l"hould
part. Ii J^aue the priuileges of honor next after the biOiop of Kome.becaufe
De*** K *^ ^^^ * newe Rome. But a long time after , when a like decree was
»i dill, wade at Chalcedon, Leo ftoutly cried out againft it. And he not only
©aue himfelfe Icaue to efteemc as nothing that which fixe hundred
bifhops or mo had decreed : but alfo bitterly taunted them , for that
they toke from other fees that honor which they were fo boldcto
geue to the Churchof Conftatinoplel befech you,what other thing
could moue a man to trouble the world for fo fmal a matter,but mere
ambition?He fayth that y ought to be inuiolable, which the Niccne
Synode hath ones decreed. As though forfooth the Chriftian faith
were endangered, if one Church be preferred before an other:or as
though Patriarchies were there diuided to any other end,but for po-
licies. But we know y policy receiueth, yea requireth diuerfe chaun-*
ge$,according to the diucrfity of times. Thcrfore it is fond that Leo
pretendeth , that the honor , which by the authoritie of the Nicene
Synode was gcueato the fee 'of Alexandria^ ought not to be geuen
w
To Saluation. Lib.4. 471
to the fee of Conftantinoplc.For common rcafontcllcth this,thacit
%iras fuch a decree , as might be taken away according to the rcfpcft
of timcs.Yca none of the biHiops of the Eaft withftodc it, whom that
ihing moft of all concerned. Truely Protcrius was prcfcntjwhom
they had made biftiop of Alexadria in the place of Diofcorus. There
wercprcfentc other Patriarches,whues honor was dimmifhed. Ic
was their parte to withftand ic , not Leos which remained fafe m his
ownc place. But when all they holdc their peace , yea aflcnt vnto it,
and onely the bifhopof Rome refiflcthritiscafy to iudgc,whal
moucth him : that is,he forcfaw that which not long after happened,
that It would come to p3(re,that, the glory of olde Rome decaying,
Conftantinoplc not contented with the fcconde place , would (Iriuc
with Rome for the Supremicic. Andyet with his crying out he did
not fo much preuaile, but that the decree of the coimcell was con-
firmed. Therefore his fuccclfors, when they fawe themfclucs oucr-
come , quietly gauc oucr that ftifFcneflc : for they fuftrcd that he
{hould be accompted the feconde Patriarche.
1 6 But within a litle after , lohn which in Grcgories time ruled
the Church of Conftantinoplc , brake forth fo farre that he called
himfelfe the vniuerfall Patriarche. Here Gregorie > left he ftiould in
a very good caufc faile to defende his ownc fee, did conftantlyfct
himfclf againft him. And truely both the pride and madneflc of lohn
was intolerable, which defircd to make the boudesofhis biftioprikc
egall with the boundes of the Empire. And yet Gregorie doth not
claime to himfelfe , that which he denieth to an other: but abhor*
reth that name as wicked, and vngodly,andabhominablc,whofocucr
lake it vpon him. Yea and alfo in one place he is angry with Eulolius tibr.f.
biftiop of Alexandria , which had honored him with fuch a title. ^P'"*»
Beholde (fayeth he) in the preface of the Epiftle which ye direded ^ *
to my fclte that haue forbidden it, ye hauc cared to emprintethc
word of proude calling,in naming me vniuerfall Popc.Which.l pray
that your holineflc will no more do becaufe that is wiihdrawen from
you, which is giuen to an other more than rcalbn requircth.I compe
it no honor, whcrin I fc the honor of my brethren to be diminiftied.
For my honor is the honor of the vniuerfall Church, and the founde
ftrcngth of my brethren. But if your holinelTe call me the vniuerfall
Popc,it denieth it felfe to be that which it cofcflcth me to be wholly,
Truely Gregorie ftodc in a good and honeft caufc. But lohn holpcn
by the fauor of Maurice the Emperor,could neucr be rcmoued front
his purpofe. Cyriacus alio his fucccflbr ncucr fuffercd himfelfe to be
entreated m thai bchalte.
Cap.y, Of the outwardc meancs
17 ActhcIaftPhoca$> which when Maurice was flainc, was (ce
in his place ( I wotc not for what caule being more frcndly to the
Romaines , but becaufe he was there crowned without ftofe) graun-
icd to Boniface the thirdjthar which Gregoricncuerrequired, that
Romefhould be the hed of all Churches After this mancr was the
eontrouerfy endcd.And yet this benefice of the Emperor, cotild noc
Q> much banc profited the fee of Rome,vnle{fc otlser things alfo had
afterwarde happened. For Gre^ria ^jC all Alia were within a htle aftct
cut of from the communion of RomcFraunce fomuch reuerenced
him, that it obeyed no further than ithfted. But it was then firft
brought into bondage when Pipine vfurped the kingdome.Foi when
Zacharie bifliop of Rome had bene his helper to the breachc of his
faith , and to robbery , chat thrufting out the liwefuJl kini^ , he might
yiolently enter i^pon the kingdomc as layed optn for a pray : he re-
cciued this rcwarde , that the fee ofRomefliouldhaue iunfdidiori
©uer the Churches of Frauncc : As robbers arc wonted in parting
ID deuide the common fpoiie : fothefc good men ordered the mat-
ter bctweene thcmfelueSjthat Pipine fhould haue the earthly and
ciuilc dominion,fpoiling the true king:and Zacharie fhould be made
hcd of all bifhops and haue the fpirituall power : which , when at the
beginning it was weakc , (as it is wont to be in newc things) was
afterward confirmed by the authority of Charlejjin maner for a like
caufe.For he was alfo indetted to the bifliop of Rome,for that by his
endcuor he had attcincd to the honor of the Empire. But although
it be credible, that Churches echc where were before that time
much deformed,yetir is ccrtainc that the oldc forme of the Church
was then fii ft vtterly defaced in Frauncc and Germanic. There re-
inaineyetintherecordesofthccourtof Parifebrefc notes ofthcfe
times , which , where they cntreate of the matters of the Churchy
inakemcntionofthecoucnantboth of Pipine and of Charles with
the bifhop of Rome. Thereby wc may gather that then was an alte-
ration made of the olde ftate.
i8 Sins that time , when things did echc where daily fall from
Wotfc to worfc, the tyranny of the fee of Rome was nowc and then
alfo ftablifhed and encreafed , and that partly by the ignorance , and
partly by theflouthfulneflc of the bifliops. For when one man tokc
all things vpon him,and without mcafure proceded more and more
to aduaunce himfclfc againft lawc and 1 ight:the bifhops did not with
fuch 2clc as they ought, cndeuor themfelues to rcf^raine his luf^,8e
though they wared not couragc,yct they were def^itute of true lear-
Bing and knowledge : fo chat the/ were nothing fiu to attcmpte fo
great
To Saliiation. Lib.4. 471
great a maircr.Therforc wc fee what & howc Monftruous an Tnholf
defiling of all holy things,& a fcactcring abrodc of the whole order of
the Church , was in Bcrnardes timc.Hc coplaiacch that there rcfort
by hcapcs to Rome out of all the world , ambitious men , couctous,
SimoniaSjfobbersof God,kepcrs of concubines,comittcrsof inceft, Libra.
and all fuch mor ^"^crs, to obLeinc or retcine ecdcfiafticali honors by *'j^ "
the Apoftolikc authority; & that fraud and vndcrmining,& violence * ^*"
were growcn in forcc.He faith that that maner of iudging which the
Wis vfcd,was abhominablc,and vnfcmcly, not onely for the Church,
but alfo for a iudiciall court. He cricth out that the Church is full of
ambitious men rand that there is none that more drcdcth to comit
mifchcuous Aftes, than robbers do in their caue, when they dcuide
the fpoilcs of waifaring men. Fewe (fayeth he) dolokc vnto the
mouth of the lawgeuer, but vnto his handes. But not without caufc
For thofc hades do all the Popes bufincfTcWhat a thinj^ is this,thaC
they are bouglitof the fpoiles ofChurchcs.that fay to thee, oh well
done,wcll done ? The life of the poore is fowcn in thcftrctcs of the
nche : filucr gliftcrcth in the mire : men run to it from all places:noc
the poore,but the ftrangcr taketh it vp,or he paraducntarc that run-
neth faftcft before. But this maner, or rather this death, came not of
lhce,I would to God it mi^ht cnde m thee. Among thcfc things thou
a Paftor gocft forward compafTed with much and prccioug aray.If I
durft fay itjthefc are rather the Paftors of deuils.than of (hcpc. For- Libr.|«
loth Peter did thus,Paulc played thus.Thy court is more accuftomc4
torcceiuc men good than to make them good. For the ill do not
there profit, but the good do decay. Nowc as for the abufcs of ap-
pealles that he rehearfeth , no godly roan can reade them without
great horror. At the laft he thus cocludeth of that vnbrideled gredi-
nclTe of the fee of Rome in the vfurpingof iurifdidion:! fpeake the
murmour and common complaint of the Churches. They cric out
that they be mangled and difmtmbred. There arc cither none or
fewe that do not either bewailc or fcare this plage. Alkcll thou what
plage? The Abbotes arc plucked from the biftiops, the bilhop* from
the Archcbifliop$,&c. It is maruclous if this may bccxcufed. In fo
doing yc prouc that ye hauc fulncfle of power,but not of rightcouf-
ncflc. Yc do this , becaufc yc can do it ; but whether ye alfo ought to
do i t,is a qucftion. Ye arc fett to prcfcruc , not to cnuie to cucry man
his honor and his owne degree. Thefc fewe things of many I lifted
to ieahearfe,partly that the rede: s may fee,how fore the Church was
then decayed , and partly that they may know in howc great loiovrc
and mourning this calamitic helde all the godly.
Cap.y. Of the outward meanes
I ^ But nowe , albeit that wc graunte to the biftiop of Rome at
this day that preeminence and largeneffe of iurifdidion, which that
fee had in the meane times, as in the times of Leo and of Gregory:
what is that to the prcfcnt ftate of the Papacic ? { do not yet fpeakc
of the earthly dommion , nor of the ciuil power thereof, which wc
will afterwarde confider m place fit font: but thev^-ry fpirituallgo-
ticrnmcnty theyboftof,whathathithketo the ftate of thofe times?
For they dchnc the Pope none otherwile than the Supreme bed of
the Church inearth , and the vniucrfall bifhopof the whole world.
And the bifhops themfelucSjwhcn they fpeakc of their owne autho-
ritic, do with great ftoutnefleof countenance, pronounce that to
them belongcth the power to commaunde5& other are bounde to the
nccefTitie to obey , chat fo all their decrees are to be holden as con-
firmed with the diuinc voice of Peter: that the prouinciall Synodcs,
arc without force, becaufe they want the prefcnce of the Pope:
that they may order clerkcs of any Church that they will: and may
call them to their fee that haue bene ordered els where. Innumerable
of that forte are in Gratians packc , which I do not nowe rchearfcf
Icaft I ihould be to tedious to the Reders. But this is the fumme of
them, chat onely the bifliop of Rome hath the Supreme hearing and
determining of all ccclcfiafticall caufcs,whetherit be in iudging and
defining of doflrines,or in making of lawes, or in ftablilhing of dis-
cipline, or in executing or iudgements : It were alfo long and fuper -
Buous to rchearfe the priuileges that they take to thcmlelues in rc-
fcruations , as they call them. But, (which is moft intollerable of all
Decret. other) they leaue no iudgement in earth to reftraine and bridle their
17. que- outragious luft , if they abufc fo immcafurablc power. It is lawefull
N^ for no man (fay they) to reuoke the iudgement of that fee , becaufe
mini. ^^ *^^ Supremicic of the Church of Rome. Againc.The iudge (halbc
Innoc. iudged neither by the Em peror,nor by kinges,nor by all the Clergic,
<?,<]ne. ? nor of the people.That is m dcedc to imperioufly done,th3t one man
cap.ne ^lakcth himfelfe iudge of all men, and fuftreth himfelfetoobey the
S vm Q iudgement of no man. But what if he vfe tyranny oucr th e people of
cjueftij. God ? if he fcattcr abroade and waft the kmgdomc of Chrift? if he
<^ap. trouble the whole Church ? if he turnc the office of Paftor into rob-
j^ljorii terie ? Yea though he be neuer fo mifchcuous , he fayeth that he is
Ibid '^ not bounde to yeldc accomptc. For thefc be the fayinges of the
takla, bifhops: Gods wil was to determine the caufes of other men by men,
but he hath without queftion referued thebifhop of this fee to his
owne iudgement. Againc. The doinges of fubicdcs arc iudged of vs;
but oures^of God onely.
10 And
To Saluation. Lib.4. 475
-- 10 And that fiich decrees might hai;c tlic more weight , they
hauefnlfly thiullm thr name ofrhcoldc bill:ops,as though things
had bene (o ordcincd tromthe becinning ; v^hcIeas it ismoft ctr-
Xamc,that it is nrwc & lardy f(»rj;rd v\hat(ocuei tic bi/liop oi Rorrtc
gtucth to himfdfc more than we haucrchcarfcd to be ^ciien him
by ihc auncient Goiincell . Yea they arc come to To great fliumelcf-
nefle , thai they haoe let forth a w.iung vnotr the name of Ana-
(la/tus Patriarchs of Conllantino. le ,wherin he tift.ticthrhat it was bide,
decreed by the oldc rules , that nothing flioiild be done euen in the CJ- Ant,
furtheft prouinces, that were norHft nioued to the fee of Rome.
Beiidc this tli.it it is ccrtainc that this is moli vain? , what man Hiall
thinkc ithkcly.thatfuch a commendation of the fee of Rome pro-
ceded from the aduertary and enmer of the honor & dignirie ihtrof?
But verily itbehoucd ihar ihcie AritichnfteslLould be carried on to
fo great nvdnefle and bhndcnefTe ,that their lewdenefie might be
plaine forillmento fec^atlcaftro many as will open their eyts. But
the decretallepiftlcs heaped togt ther by Gregoric the ix-againe the
Clementines, and Extrauaeantesof Martine,doyct more openly and
With fullcf mouth tche where bieath forth their cutragious fierce-
jieflcand as it were thetyrarrwe of barbarou* kinges. But thcfe be
the oracles , by which liic Romaniftcs will hauc therr papacie to be
*veyed. Hereupon arofe tl .ofc norable p: incij les , which at this day
haue cuery where in the papacie the foicc of oracles : that the Pope
can not errc : that ihtt Pope is abouc thr Cdurcclls : that the Pope is
the vniuerfall bifhop of all bifliops.and the Supreme head of the
Church in earth : I paifc ouer the much abiuidcr lollies , which the
fooliih Canoniftes babble inthiir fcholcs : to which yet the Romilh
diuines do not ontly alfcnic , but do allb clap their handes at them,
10 flatter their idolc.
- zi I will notdeale with them by extremity of right.Some other
man would agamft this their fo ^reat infolcnce let the faying of Cy-
p: iane, which he v(ed among the bilhops , at whoes coiincell he face
as chiefe. None of vs calkrh himfclfe b!{hopof bifliopSjor with ty-
rannous fearc compeileth his fdlowc biOiopsto neccllitie to obey.
He would obicd that , which a litle afterwarde was decreed at Car-
thage.That n«ne fliould be called Prince of Priefts,or chiefe bifhop.
He would gather many tcftimonies out of Hiftories , Canons out of
Synodes , and many fentences our of the bokes of olde writers , by
which the bifhop of Rome (houid be brought downe into the fcU
lowfhip of the rcrt.But T polft oucr nil thefc,lca(l I ihould feeme too
precifely to preiTc chcni.Buclec the bd^ patioocs of the Ice of Rome
000
Cap.7. Of the outwardc mcanes
aunfwcre me, with what face they dare defcnde the title ofvnioer*
fal bifhop, which they fc Co oft to be condemned with curfc by Grc-
gone. If Gregorics tcftimonic ought co be of fotcc, they do thereby
declare that Antichrift istheir biniop,bccaufc they make him vniuer-
falLThc name alfo of hed was no more yfuall. For thus he faycth in
libr.4. one place. Peter is the chiefc member rn the body , lohn, Andrewc
fip.^>' and lames the hedcs of particular peoples : yet they all are membc w
of the Church vnder one hed r yea the holy ones before the lawe#
the holy ones vnder thclawe , the holy ones vnder gracb > are Cct a*
mong members , altogether making vp the body of the Lorde : and
no man euer willed to haue himfelfe called vniuer fall. Bat whereas
the bifhop of Rome takcth vpofl himfelfe the power of commaun-
Libr.7. ding J that ihing fmally agreeth with that whicii Gregory iaith in an
EpiIto» other place,For whereas Eulolius bifhop of Alexandria,had faid that
' * he was commaunded by him , he aunfwcred in this wife. I pray ye,
take away this word of commanding from my hearing. For I knowc
what I am and what ye bc.ln placc>yc be to me brethren : in mancr»
ye be to me fathers.Thereforc I commanded not, but Ieared*io cell
you thofe things that I thought profitable. Whereas he foextendeth
his iurifdidion without end,he doth therin great & hainous wrong,
notonely rothe other bidiops > but al^fo to all particular Churches,
which he foteareth andplucketh inpeece$,thathemay bildehis
feaie of their ruincs. But whereas he exempteth himfelfe from all
rudgemcnts , and will fo rcigne after the mancr of rirantes, that he
accompteth his owne oiicly luft for lawe ,iliac verily is fo hainous,
and fofarre from ecclefiaflicaIlord<:r,that it may m no wife be bornct
for it vttcrly abhorreth not oncly ftom aUfcling of godhneffc ,buc
aho from all humanitic.
2i But that I be not copcllcd to go through & examine al things
particularly , I do againe appellc to them , that will at this day be ac-
comptedihebeft and moft faith full patroncsof the fee of Rome,
whether chcy be not aihamcdto dcfende the prefcnt ftatc of the pa-
parrc : which ic is certainc to be a hundred times more corrupt , than
libr- r. it was in rhe times of Gregory and Bernard:which ftate yet did then
hpill-s. fo much difplcafe thofe holy men.Giegory eche where coplaincih,
7 & 2$. that he is to much diuerfly drawen away with forain bu(incs:chat he
& alibi. -J y^jjgj- jhe colour of bifhoprike brought back to the wortd:wherin
he feruetn To many cares of the world as he neuer remembrerh that
he ferued when he was a lay man : that he is prefled downe with lu-
mulce of worldly afFaircs,that his minde is nothing rarfcd vp to things
aboue : that he is (hakcn with many waucs of caufcs > and coifed wicl)
tempc-
To Saliiation. Lib.4. 474
tcmpcftcs of trouble lomc life: To that he may worthily fay, I ana
come intoihc depth of the fca. Trucly among thofc earthly bu(i-
nclTes , he might yet leache the people with Sermons , priuatciy ad.
monilhc and corrcd iuch as it bclioucd , order the Church , gtuc
counftU to his fcllowe biihops and cxhoft them to then dune : bc-
fidc thefe things there remained fomc time to write : and yet he la-
mcntcth his calamine, that he is drowned in ihcdepeftfea* If the
gouerncmi nr af that tune was a fea : what is to be fayed of the pa-
pacie at this time f For what likcnclfc hnuc ihcy together ? Here be
no prcachings,no care of difcipline.no zelc to the Churche.s,no fpi-
ricuall doing.finally nothing but the world. Yet tl is maze is prnifcd,
as though there could nothing be founde more orderly and better
framt d.But what complamtcs doth Bcrnarde pourc oiitjwhai groncs
doth he vttcr,whcn he lokcth vpon the faultts of his agtPVV'hat then
would he do, if he behcldc this our agcof iron.and woifc it any be
woife than iron? What oblfinatc wickcdin fle is this,ftot oneiy ftiffly
to dcftnde as holy and diuinc, that which all the holy men haue with
one mouth condemned : but alfo to abufe their teflimonie to the dc-
fenfc of the papacie , which it is Gcrtaine that they ncucr kncwe of?
Hovvbcit of Bcrnardes time I confefl'c , that then the corruption of
ill ihiniS was fo great, that it was not much vnlikc oui timc.But they
arcwithoDt all lhame,that fetche any prctcnfc for it, out of that
meane age,lhat is the time of Leo,Gregory,5i fuch other. For they
do like as if one , to ft^bliHie the Monarchie of Emperowrs , would
praife the oldc llate of the Empire of Rome : that is, would borrowe
the praifcs of hbcrtic,to fct forth the honor of tyranny.
xj Finally , although all thefe things were graunted them ; ycc
there arifeth offreHj ancwe ftrife for them, when we deny that there
is a Church at R( me,in which fuch benefitcs may be rclident : when
we dcnic that there is a bifhop.which may bearc thefe pnuilcgcs of
didnicic. Admit therefore all thofe things to be true , (which yet wc
hauc already wroong from them) that Peter was by the mouth of
Chrift appointed bed of the vniucrfall Church : and that he Icii the
honor that was gcuen him, in the Ice of Rome : chat the fame was
ftablilhcd by the authoritie of the auncient Church, and confirmed
with long continuauncc : that the Supreme power hath bene alway
by one confent geucn of all men to the bilhopof Rome : that he
hath bene the iiidge of all both caufcs and mcn,and himfelfc fubieft
10 the iudi;en)cnt of none .- let them haue alfo more, if they will : yet
1 anfwercin one word, that none of thefe things auai!e,vn(eflc thtrc
be at Rome a Church & a bi(hop.Tl)is they muft net dcs grauntmc,
000 ij
Cap.7. Of the outwardemeancs
that ic can not be the morher of Churches , which is not it fcire a
Church : that he can not be chiefc ofbifhopsywhich is nothimfelfe
a bifhop Will they therforc haue the fee ApoftoUkc atRome?Thcn
let them lliewc me a true and lawefuU Apoftlefhip. WiH they hauc
the chief bilhop? Then let them {hewe me a bifhop.But what? where
will they fliewe vs any face of a Church ? They name one in dcedc,
and haue it oft in their mouth. Truely the Church is knowen by
her certamc markcs : and bilhoprike is a name of office. 1 fpeakc not
here of the people: but of the goucrnmcnt it fclfe, which ought
conimualiy to fliine in the Church. Where is the miniftcrie in their
Church, fuch as Chrirtcs inftitution requircth?Let vs call to remem-
brance that which hath before bene fpokcn of the office of Pricfts
and of a bifhop. If we fhall bring the office of Cardinals to be tried
by tbat rule, we (hall confeffe that they are nothing leffe than Priefts.
As for the chicfe bilhop himfelfe , I would faine knowe what one
thing at all he hath biihophke. Firftitis the principall pointinthe
office of a biihop , to teach the people with the word of God : an
other and the next point to that is , to minifter the facramcnis : the
third IS to admonifhand exhortjyea and to corrcft them tbat offend,
and to hold the people together in holy difcipline. Whatofthefc
things doth hel^yeajwhat doth he faine himfelfe to do : Let them tell
therefore, by what meanethcy would haue him to be compteda
bilhopjthat doth not with his little finget , no not ones fo much as m
outwarde lhcw?,touche any part of a bifliops office.
24 It is nor fo of a bifhop as it is of a king. For a king, although
he do not execute that which belongeth to a king , doth neuerthe-
Icfi'e rcteine the honor and title. But in iudging of a birtiop refped is
had :o Chnftes commaundemcnt, which alway ought to be of force
in rhe Church. Therefore let the Romaniftcsioofe me this knot. I
dcnie that their hy bifhop , is the chiefe of bifhops, forafnmch as he
is no bifliop. They muft needes prouethislaft pointtobe fal!c,if
they will haue the vidorie in the firft.But howe fay they to this, that
he not onely hath no propcrtie of a bi{hop,but rather all things con-
trarie? But hers ,0 God, where at fliall I beginne? at his learning, or
at his maners ? What fliall I fav,or what (hall 1 leauc vnfaidc ? where
fhall I make an cnde ? This 1 fay : that whereas the world is at this
day , (tufFcd with fo many pcruerfc and wicked dodrines ,full of fo
many kindes offuperftitions, blinded with fomany errors, drowned
in fo great idolatry : there is none of thcfe any where, that hathe not
cither fiowcd from thenfe,or at Icaft bene there confirmed. Neither
ischeicany other caufc ^ why the biffiops are caried with To greate
rage
To Saluation. Lib.4. 475
rage againft the dodrinc of the Gofpell newly fpringing vp agntnc,
why they bend all cheirltrcngthcs toopprefle it, why they kindle vp
kings and princes tocrueltie jbutbccaufc they fee that their whole
kingdom dccaycth & faileth down, (o Tone as the Gofpell of Chi ft
£ometh in place. Leo was cruell : Clement was bloudie : Paulc is a
fierce murthercr. But nature hath not (6 much moued them to fight
againft the truth , as for that this was their onely meane to mamtain
their power.! herforc fith ihey can not be fafejtiU they hauc driucn
awayChrift , they trauaile in this caufe , as if they did fight for their
religion and contries , and for their owne liues. What then ? Shail
that be to vs the Ccc Apoftolike , where we fee nothing but horrible
Apbftafic?Shal he be Chrittes vicar, which by perfccuting the Gofpel
with furious entcrprifes , dorh openly profelTe hin)felfc to be An-
tichrift ? Shall he be Peters fucccfl'our , that rangcth with fwerd and
fire , to dcftroy all that cuer Peter hath builded ? Shall he be hcd of
the Church that cutting of & difrrembnngthc Church fiomChrift
the onely true head thereof, doth in it felfepluclce and teateitin
pieces ^ Admiitc verily that in the oldc time Rome was the mother
of all Churches : yet fins it hath begon to be the fcate of Andchrift,
it hath ccflcd to be that which it was.
ly We fecmc to be to much cmll fpeakers and railcrs, when wc
call the biihop of Rome Antichrift. But they that fo thinkc , do not
vndeiftandc that tliey accufe Paulc ofimmodeftie, after whom wc io
fpeake,yea out of whoes mouth wc fo fpeake. And Icaftanyman
obiede , that we do wrongfiilly wreft againft the bifhop of Rome,
thefcwordcs of Paul that are fpokcnto an other intent.I will brefc-
iy.fhewe, that they cannorbeotherwjfc vnderftanded, butof the
jPapacie. Paul wntcth, that Antichrill iliall fitt in the temple of God. ,. xjidl
In an other place alfo the Holy Ghoft dcfcribing his image in the 2.4.
pcrfon of AntiochuSjlTiewcth that his kingdome ftial confift in hauti- I^an. 7-
ncfle of fpechc,and blafphcmings of God.Hercupon we ^,ather,that *J*
it is rather a tyrannic ouer foules, than oner bodies , that is raifed vp
againft rhefpirituall kingdom of Chrift. Thcn,thatitis fuch,as doth
not abolifh the name of Chrift and the Church : but rather ftiould
abufe the prctecc of Chrift, and lurke vnder the title of the Church,
as vnder a difguifcdvifour. But although all the herefies and fedes
that hauc bene from the beginning, belong to the kingdome of An^
lichrift: yet where as Paule prophecicth, that there ftiall come a de«
parting , by this defcription he fignifieth , that that feate of abhomi'
nation ("hall then be raifed »p , when a certaine vniucrfall departing
(hall poiTcffe the Church ; howfocucr many membrcs of the Church
000 iij
Cap.7. Of the outwardc mcancs
here and there continue mthe true vnitic of faith. But where he
addeth, that in h)s time he beg:in in a myftcric to feitc vp the worke
of iniquitic , which he would afterward fhewe openly : thereby wc
vndcrltand , that thi^ cilamicie was neither to be brought in by one
man , nor to be ended m one man. Nowc whereas he dot'i fet out
Antichirft by. this marke ,th:it he (hoiild plucke away from God his
due honor, to ti*ke it to himfclfithis is the chiefe token that wc ought
to followe m feeking out of Antichrift Specially where fuch pride
proccdeih euen to the publikc difliparion of the Church. Sirh thcr-
fore it is certaine > that the bilhop of Rome hath fhamelcfTely con-
ueyed away to himfcifc thu wiiich was the chiefe propre thing to
God alone &Chrjft,itf5nottobc douted but t'l.it he is the capitainc
and ftanderdbe^ii er of the wicked andabhominsblekingdome.
z6 Nowc let the Romr<nif!s go, and obird an iquiiie againft vs:
As if in fo great alreration of all t ines , ihelionor of iheSee might
"^*^^' ftand where there is no fee. Euiebius tellcth, howc God, that there
' I rnight be place for his vengeance , rcmoucd the Church that was at
Hicrufalcm to Pclla. That which we hcarc to haue bene ones doonc,
might be ofterdonnc. Therefore fcro bindethi- honor offuprc*
macy toaplace , that he which is indcedethcmoft hateful! enemy
ip»*vr^ ofChnftjthc hieft aduerf^rie of" the Gofpell , the grcateft wafter
and dcftroyer of the Church.the moft crutll iiaughierma & butcher
* •► * of the famtSjfhould neuertheJclfc be accompted the vicar ofjChrift,
■ the fucceflor of Peter, the chief biHiop of the Church,onlybecaufc
heocGupieth the kctha? was ones fhechi:fc(l of allrthatvcnly is to
much to be fcorncd and foohlhc.l fpeakc not, howc great diftcrencc
there is bctwene the popes chauncerie , and a well framed order of
the Church, Howbeit this one thmg may well take away all dout of
this queftion. For no man that hath his right wit, will thinkethc
bifhopnke enclofcd in leade and bullcs : much lefle, in that fchoolc
of fraudcs and deccitcs,in which thingcs the Popes fpirituall gouern-
tnent confiftcth. Therefore it was verv well faid by a certain man,
that that Church of Rome which is bofted of ,is long ago tourned
into a court which onely is nowc fecnc at Rome. Neither do I here
accufe the faultes of men rbutl {hewe that the Papacic it fclfcis
dircdly contrary to the true order of a Church.
17 But if wc come to the perfones of men ,it is well enough
knowc what mancr of vicars of Chrift we fhall finde.Iulius forfooth,
and Leo,and Clcmcnt,and Paul, fhalbe pillers of the chriftian faith,
and the chiefe cxpofitours of religion.which neuer knewe any other
thing of Chrii) , than that which he had learned in Lucians fchole.
But
To Saluation. Lib4. 47^
But why do I reckcn vp thrc or fewer Popcs?as though it were dout-
luljwhat miner of forme of religion the Popes with their whole col-
lege of Cardinals haue fins long ago profcffed, & at this day do pro-
fcflc. For firft this is the prinapali article of that fccrct Diumity that
rcigncth among them , That there is no God : the (ccondc , Thac
all things that arc written and taught concerning Chrift, arc lies and
ileceits : the third, That the dodnne of the life to come, and of the
kft refurrcdion ,arc mere fables. They do not all thinke fo : and
£cw,c of them fpcake fo.I graunt. But this hath long ago beeon to be
iheordinarie rehgion of Popes. Whereas this is very well knowen
to all that knowe Rome,yct the Romifhe Diuincs ceafTc not to boft,
that by Chriftes priuile'ge it is prouidcd,that the Pope can not erre,
becaufeitwasraid to Peter : I hauc prayed for thee, that thy faith
fliould not faint. What, I pray you,winne they by mocking fo (hame- Luc.»J.
lcirely,bui: that the whole world may vnderftand,that they are como J **
to thatextremitie of wickcdne^Tc , that they neither feare God , nor
ftandc in awe of men^
28 But let vs imaginCjthat the vngodlincs of thofc Popes whotn
I haue fpokcn of.is hidden , becaufc they haue neither pubhlhed it
by prechings , nor by writings : but onely hauc bewrayed it at their
table,and in their chamber, or at leaft within wallcs of houfes. But if • .^
jhey will haue this priuilege to be of force,whicK they prctcdc,they
mull ncedes wipe lohn the. xxij. out of the number of Popes, who • ' -
openly affirmed that foules are mortall , and that they die together "" *
with the bodies vncjl tljc day of rcfurrcdion. And, that you may per-
cciucthat the whole See with her principallftayes was then wholly
fallcn:none of all the Cardinals withftode fo great a madneiTc , but
the fchoolc of Parife moucd the king of Frauncc to compcU him to Gerlbn
recant it. The kinge forbad his fubicdes to communicate with him, whicli
TnleflTe he did out of hande repent : and the rame,as the maner is,hc ^^
proclaimed by a heralde.The Pope compelled by this neccditie, ab-
iured his error.This example makcth that I need? not to difpute any
more with my aduerfaries about this that they fay,that y fee of Rome
and the biOiops therof,can not erre in the faith, becaufe it was faide
to Peter,I haue prayed for thee,that thy faith may not faintc.Truly Luc.jj
he fell with fo fowlc a kindc of fall from the right faith , that he is a 5^
notable example to them that come after,that they arc not all Peters
which fuccedc after Peter in the biflioprikc. Howbeit this is alio of
it felfe fo childi(h,that it needeth no aunfwere.For if they will drawe
to Peters fucceiTours whatfoeuer was fpoken to Peter , it (hall fol*
ilow$ ch»P they arc aU Satam/oraTmuch as the Lorde faid this alfo to ^^ >^
OOO iiij »i*
Cap.7. Of the outward mcancs
Peter. Go beliindc , thou Satan , becaule thou art an offence to me.
For :t Ihalbcas caiy for vstoturne backc this latter faying agauiA
them,as jt fhalbe for them to obicd the other againft vs.
2p But I hft not to ftriuc with them in playing the foole.Ther-
fore I rcturnc thether from whcnfe I made.digct (fion.So to bind the
place,and Chrift,anu the Holy Ghoft,and the Church together, that
whofoiiier lie in that place, although he be the deuil,yec he mutt bo
iudgcdthe vicar of Chrift,and the hed of :hc Church,becaufe it was
ones the featc of Peter: I fay this is not oncly wicked & fclaunderou*
to Chrifl:,but alfo to great an abfurdity and <igainit common reafon*
I: IS already long ago Cms the bilhops of Rome are either without al
religion, or the grcatcft enemies of rehgion. Therefore they are no
more made the vicars of Chnit ^ by realon ot the featc which they
^cf occupie,than an idolhwhcn it is fet in the te'jjle of God,is to be taken
for God. Nowe if their maners be to be lodged *ppon, let the Popes
themfclues aumwere for thcmfelucs:whacone thinge at all there is
in them,whenn ihcy may be knowen for biihot.^s.Firrt vv-hereas there
is fuch life at Rome , they not onely winking at it, but alfo a.s it were
with ferret countenacc allowing it,tbis is vtteriy vnmete for biibops,
whoes duetie is vvith feucntie of difciplmc to rcliraine thelicetiouf-
nefle of the people. But 1 will not be lo rigorous againft them , to
charge them witn other mens fiiultes. But whereas they ihemfelues,
vvith their owne houfthold,with almoft y whule college of Cardinals,
with y whole flocke of their clcrgie,aic fo eeuen forth to all wicked-
nene,iiithincfle,vnclc3nnelfe,to all kindes of Jewde and mjfcheuouf
doings , that th^yrcfcmble rather monftersthan men :iherintruely
they bewray thcll-Uies to be nothing Icflc tha bilhops. And yet they
neede not to feare Icaft 1 {hould turrhcr difciok their filthineffe. For
both I am wery to haue to do in fo ftinking mire , and I muft fauour
chaft eares , and I thinke that I haue already enough and more pro-
ued that which I went about: that is, that although Rome had in old
time bene the headof Churches, yet at this day flie is not worthy
to be ildged or\e of the fmallcft toes of the Ci>urches feete.
' go As concerning the Cardinals (as they call ihcm)I can not tell
howc it is come to pafle , that they be (6 fodeinly r.'lcn vp to fo great
dignide.Thii name in Gregories time belonged to bifhops only.For
fo oft .is he make th mennon of Cardmals,he meaneth it not of them
oftheChurchof Rome, butofany orher.'fo that brefely , a Cardi-
ii.ill Prieft is nothing els but a bilhop. In the writers before tha rage
Ifin !e not this name 3t all. But I fee that they were then lelfc than
biihops, whom they be nowe farre aboue. This laying of Auguftme
' is vvcll
To Saluation. Lib.4. 477
is well knowcn : Although according to ihc names ofhonorjwhich
the vfe of the Church hach already obtainca , bifhoprike is greater
than priefthoode,yet in many things Augoftine is lefle than Hicrom.
Here in deede he maketh difference betwcne a prieft of the Church
of Rome andothcr:but he indifferently fetteth them all behindc the
bilhops.And f was fo long obfcruedjthat m y Counccl at Carthage,
when there were prefenc two legates of the lee of Rome , the one
a bi(hop,the other a pricft,thc prieft was thruft back into y laft place.
But not to folow two old exampleSjthereremaineth aCouncelhol-
dcn vnder Grcgorie at Rome.at which the pneftes fate m the lowtft
pl3ce,& fubicribed feuerally by themfclues, as for the Dcacons,they
nad no place at al in fubfcribrng. And truely they had then no oifficc,
-but to be prefent and vnder the bifhop at miniftring of dodrinc -nd
of the facramcnts.Now the cafe is fo changed,that they are become
the couTins tjf kings and Eraperours. And it is no dout but that they
grew vp by htle and litle together with their heade , till they were
aduaunccd to this hie toppe of dignity. But this alfo I thou^hi good
to touch ilionly by the way , that the readers might the better vn-
derftande, that the See of Rome, fuch as it is at this day,doth much
differ from that auncient onejVndei preienfc wherof, ic doih nowc
maintainc and defende it felfe.But of what fort foeucr they were in
old time, forafmuch as they haue now noti^.inrc of the true and law-
full office in the Church,they rccame only a deceitful colour & vainc
vifounyea forafmuch as they haue all thinc,,es ftcerly contrary,it was
neceffary that that (hould haopen totbem,which Grcgorie wrytcih
fo oit.T fay ir(rayth be)wepinr.c:I giuc warninge of it,gronin9;v Cnh
the order of priefthoode is fallen within , it (hall alfo not be able to ^ ' ,f^^
ftand long wit) out. But rather u behoued that this fnould be fulfilled & 55.
in the which Malachie fayth of fuch : Ye haue gone backe out of the Lib 5.
way,and haue made many to ftumble in the iaw. Therefore ye h'aue ^'"(*- '
tnadc voide the coaenant of Lcui,fayth the Lord Therf'orc bcholde ^ '*•
I haue giuen you out of eftimation,and vile to all the people. Now I
leauc It to all the godly to thinke of what fort is that fupremc height •
of the Hierarchic of Romc,whereunto the Papiftes with abhomina-
bic (hamelefneffe ftickc not to make fubied the very worde of God,
wkich ought to haue bin honorable & holy both to hcaucn & earth,
Bicn and AngcU.
Cap.8. Of the outward mcancs
The viij. Chapter.
Ofthi pevvtr of the Church di touching the artielet »fFaith:ir vtt'ttk
how vttbndled Ucontioufnti it hath m the Pap4ey bin vvrejltd
to corrHpt <»// fnrenejfe of "Deilrine.
NO w folowcth the third place, of the power of the Church,
which partely coniiftcch in all the biOioppes > and partc-
ly in the CounccUes, and chofe either prouinciall or gcne«
rall . I fpeake onely of the fpirituall power, which is pro*
per to the Church . That coniiftcth either in dodrine , or in iurif-
didion , or in makinge of lawes . Do^rine hath two partes , the au«
thoritie to tcache articles of Dodrine, and the expoundinge of
them. Before that we beginne to difcourfc of eucry one of thcfe in
fpecialcy , we will that the godly readers be warned, that whatfoeuer
is taught concerning the power of the Church , they mull remem-
:or. bcr to applie it to that ende, whereunto ( as Paule tcftifieth ) it was
^^ giuen : that is, to edification , and not to deftru^ion : which who fo
'* lawefully vfe , they thinke themfcluf s no more than the miniftcrj
of Chrill, and therewithal! the miniftcrs of the people in Chrift,
Nowe of the edifyinge of the Church , this is the onely way, if the
minifters themfelucs cndeuour to prcfcruc to Chrift his authoritie,
which can not othcrwife be fafe vnleflle that be left vnio him , which
hcreceiued of his Father : that is ,that he be the onely fchoolemai-
fter of the Church. For it is wryttcn, not of any other, but of him a-
, _ lone,Hcare him.The power of the Church thcrfore is not to be fpa-
ringly fct forth, but yet to be enclofed within ccrtaine boundes, that
it be not drawen hither and thither after the luft of mcn.Hereunto ii
fbalbc much profitable to note, how it is defcribcd of the Prophctcs
and Apoftles. For if we fimply graunt vnto me fuch power as they lift
to take vppon them, it is plainc to all men, what a flippery readineffe
there is to fal into tyranny,which ought to be farre from the Church
ofCbrift.
z Thcrfore here it tnuft be f cmcmbred,that whatfoeuer author!*
ty or dignity y holy Ghoft in the fcripture giueth either to the pricftt
or to the Prophets,or to the Apoftles, or to the fuccefTours of the A-
poftlcs,al that fame is giuen,not proprely to the men themfclues,buc
to the miniftery ouer which they are appointed,or(to fpeake it more
plainly in one word)whereof the miniftery is commited to them For
if we go through them all in order ,we ihall not finde that they had a-
ny authority to teach or to anfwere,but in the name and word of the
Lord.For when they are called to the o^ce^it is alfo cnioyned them,
(hai
To Saluation. Lib4. 478
ihat they fhould bung noihingc of thcmfciucs, but fpeakc out of the
mouth of the Lord. And he himfclfc doth not bring them foorth to
be heard of the people , before that he hauc giuen them mftiudions Eko. j.4
what they ought 10 fpcakc,to tlic cntent that they (ho jld fpcake no-
thing bcfidc his word.Moles himfch'e,the prince of all the Prophets,
was to be heard aboue the reftrbut he was firft inftrufted with his c6- Exo.14,
maundemetcSjthat he might not declare any thing at all,but fro the ?*
Lord. Tnereforeitis fayd,ihat the people when they embraced his '^'* *
dodrine,bclcucd in God and in his feiriiant Mofes. Alfo that the au-
tiiority ofrhepritftcs ihould notgjjDwincxjntcmpt^itwasftitbiifhed
with OToft grieuous penalties. But ther^ithall the Lord fijeweth vpon Mala >•
what condition they were to be heard, when he faith y he hath made 4. Sc 6,
liiscoucnac with Leui, that the law of trueth (hould be in his mouth.
And a litie after he addcth:Tbe hps of the pricft (bal kepc knowledge,
& they ihal rccjuire the law at his mouthtbccaufc he is the angcU of
the God of hoftcs. Therefore if the pritft will be heard, Itt him fhew
hiraljclfc the melfingerofGodrthat is, let him faithfully reportc the Deu.17
c6mauii<icmcnts that he receiued of his author. And where it is fpe- 'o»
cially encrcj^tc.d of the hearing of them, this is cxprefly fct,That they
may anfwere according to the law of God.
J Wh.u maner of power the Prophets generally had,i$ very well
d^fcribcd in EzechiehThou fonne of man(riyth the Lord) I hauc gi- £^^«
uenthce tobca warcheman to the houfe of Ifraell. Therefore thou 17.
fhalt heare the worde out of mv mouth , and thou {halt declare it to
them from me. He that is commaunded to heare out of the mouth of
the Lorde,is he not forbidden to inuent any thinge of himfclfc ? But
what is to declare from the Lord , hut fo to fpeakc as he may boldely
toaftjthat it is not his ownc,buc the Lords word y he hath brought?
The k\£t fame thm^is in Hicrcmy,in other words. Let the Prophet jj'*^**'
^(ay tb he)wirh whom is a drcame, tell a drcame:& let him that hath
my word fpcake my word true. Certainly he appointeth a law to th^
«ll. And thatis fuch, that he pcrmitteth not any to teach more thaa
he is commaunded. And after he calleth it chafFe.all that is not come
from himfclfe only.Therfore none of the Prophets themfelucs ope-
ned his mouthjbut as the Lord told him the wordes before. Wheru- E***^ f-
pon thcfc fayings arc fo oft found among thcmrthe word of the lord, ^"'»*«^
the burden of the Lord,fo fayrh the Lord, the mouth of 7 Lord hath
fpokca And worthily. For Efay cried out that he had defiled lips. Ic- p.
rcmy cofcfTed that he could not fpeakc,becaufc he was a child rWhat j^^ ,'J
f oulde proccede from the defiled mouth of the one, and the fooliih
mouch of the ocherjbucyocleaneand vnwifcjif chey had fpok^ their
Cap.8. Of the outward mcancs
owne rpcch?But his lips were holy and pure, when they began to be
the inftruments of the holy Ghoft. When the Prophets are boundc
with this religion , that they deliucr nothingc , but that which they
hauc recciued , then they be garnilhed with notable power and ex«
cellent titles. For when thcloi de tcftifieth , that he hath fct them o-
uer nations and kingdomes,to plucke vp and to roote out,to dclhoy
era. lo and plucke downc, to build and to plant , he byandby adioyneth chc
caufctbecaufe he hath put his words in their mouth.
4 Now if you loofee to the Apoftlcs : they are in deedc commen-
ded with many & notable titles, that they are the light of the world,
and the fait of the earth,that they are to be hearde in ftcde of Chrirt,
that whatfoeucr they binde or loofe in earth fhalbc bound or loofed
in heauen. But in their very name they fliew how much is permittc4
them in their officcrthat is»if they be Apoftles, that they fhould not
prate whatlocucr they hft:but (hould faithfully report his commaun-
dements fro whom they arc fcnt.And the words of Chrift arc plauic
i«at.»8 .cnoughjin w he hath determined their embaflagerwhe he commau-'
*' ded the to go & teach all nations, all thofe things y he had comaun*
ded.Yea & he himfelfe alio receiucd this law,& laid it vpo himfehc,
ohn.7. that it ihould be lawfuU for no ma to rcfufe it.My dodrinc(rayih he)
^' is not mine , bur his that fcnt me, my fathers. He that was alway the
only & cternall counfeller of the F3thcr,& he that was appointed by
the Father the Lorde and fchoolemaifter of all men , yet becaufe he
executed the miniftcry of techingc,prcfcribed by his owne example
to all minifters what rule they ought to folow in teaching.Therforc
the power of the Church is not inSnit,but fubiedto the word of the
lord,& as it were cnclofcd in it.
5 But fith this hath from the beginning bin offeree in the church,^
, & at this day ought to be in force,thac the fcruantcs of God (hould
teach nothingjwhich they haue not learned of him:yct according to
the diucrfity of times they had diuers orders of learning.But that or-
Hat X ^^^ which is now,much differeth from thofe that were before.Firft if
ty. ' * it be true which Chrift fayeih, that none hath feene the Father, but
the Sonne, and he to whom it hath pleafed the Sonne to {hew him:ic
behoued verily that rhcy ftiould be alway dirc^cd by that eternal wif*
dom of the Fathcr,which would come to the knowledge of God. For
how (hould they either haue comprehended in minde,or vtrered the
miseries of God,but by his teaching, to whom alone the fccretes of
the Father are ope?Thcrfore the holy fathers in old time knew God
noothcr wife but beholding him in the Sonne as in a glaife.When I
fay diis,l mcane that God did ncuer by aoy other ipcane difclofe him
ToSaluauon, Lib.4. 47^
felfc to men but by the Sonnc,that is,hi$ only wifdom,!ighr,& truth.
Outofthisfountainedid Adam. NocAbrahamJfaacJacob &thc
other drawc all the knowledge that they had of hcaucnly dodrinc.
Out of the fame fountainc haue alfo all the Prophets theiclues dra-
wen all the heaucnly Oracles ihat they vttcred For verily this Wifc-
dom hath alway difclofed it feltc by moe waies than oncTo the Pa-
inarchcs he vfcd lecretreuclationsrbut thcrwirhall toconfiime their
mindcSjhc adioyned iuch iignes.that it could not be doutful to them,
that It was God that fpake.The Patriarchcs conucicd ouer ft 5 hand
to hand to poftcTity,that which they had receiucd. For the Lord left
it with them to this cntcnt,ihat they lliould fo fpread it abroadc. But
the children and childrcns children,by God fecretly informing the,
did know that that which they heard was from heauen , & not from
the earth.
6 But when it plcafed God , to raifc a more apparant forme of a
Churchjhc willed to haue hi* word put in wryting & noted,that the
pricftes (hould fetch from thcfe what they might dcliuer to the peo-
ple,and that all the dodrine that (hould be taught fhould be tried by
that rule.Thcreforc after the pubiifliing of the law,whcn the prieftf
arc commaundcd to teache out of the mouth of the Lord, chcmea- *** *
ninge iSjthat they fhould teach nothinge ftraungc or difFsringc from
that kinde of learning which the Lord comprehended in the lawe:5c
to addc anddimini(h was vnlawful for them.Then followed the Pro-
phetcSjby whom in dcdt the Lord publifhcd new oracles to be added
to tlie law : but yet not fo new,but that they came out of the law,8c
had refpcd vnto it For, as touching dodrine,they were only cxpofi-
tors of the law,& added nothing vnto it,but prophecies of things to
come.Thofe exceptcd,thcy vttcred nothing elfc but a pure cxpofitio
of the law.Bui becaufe it pleafed the Lord that there fhould be a plai-
ner & larger dodrinc, that weake confcieces might be the bcttier fa-
ti5fied:he commaudtd that the Prophecies alfo (liould be put in wri»
ting,and accompted parte of his word. And hereunto were added the
hirtories, which are alfo the works of the Prophcts,butmadc by the
endiiinge of the holy Ghoft. I recken the Pfalmes amonge the Pro-
phecieSjbecaufe that which we attribute to the prophecies is alfo co-
mon to the pfalmcs . Therefore that whole body compaded of the
Jaw, prophecies, pfalmcs & hiftoricr, was the word ofy Lord toy old
pcoplcjby the rule whereof the pricfts & teachers eue vnto Chriftcs
time were bound to examine tlcir dodrinernci'her was it awful for
them to Iwarue either to the right hand or to the lcft:hecnnfe all their
office was cndofcd within thcfc boundes,thac they HiouldaunTwert
Cap.8. Of the outward mcancs
the people out of the mouth of God. Which is gaiiicrcd of a noCi*
'*** ble place of Malachie,whei'c he bidJcch them to be mindefull of the
l2w,& to giue hcdc to it, eucn to the prcichinge of the Gofpcll.For
thcrby he forbiddcth them ail new found dodrincS,& grauntcth 'he
no ieauc to fvvarae neuer fo litle out of the wav whieh Mofes haddc
faithfully (hewed the. And this is the rcafon why Dauidfo honorably
fctccth out the cxccllecjr of the law , & rehcarfeth lb maity praifcs of
it:that is, that the I ewes fliould couet no foTcin thing wKhout U)lith
Within rt was all perfedion enclofed. ;
7 But when at laft the Wifdom of God was openly (hewed in the
fie(hc > that fame Wifdom with full mouth declared vnto rs all chat
cucr can with mans witte be Gomprchended,or ou-ht to be thought
conccmingc ihcheauenly Father. Nowe theteforc,(]nce Chnftthc
fonncof righteoufnefle hath (luncd, vvc haue a pcrfcd brightnclTc
of the trueth of God, fuch as the clearenefTr is wont to be at middc
day , when the light was before but dimme. For verily rhc Prophetc
meant not tofpeake of any mcane thinge,when he wrote that God
He 1.1. *" <^'de time fpakcdiuerllv& many wayer to the fathers by the Pro-
phctes:buty inthefclartdaieshc bej^an to fpeak tovs by his btloued
Soime. For l.e (ignifieth, yea he openly declarcth, thai Godwill not
hereafter, as he did before, fpcake fomctime by feme and fometimc
by other, nor wiUadde Prophecies to Prophecies, or rcuelations to
rcuelatrorts:but that he hath fo fulfilled all the paries of teachingc in
, the Sonne , that ihcy muft haue this of him for the laft and eternall
teftimony. After which fort al this time of the new Teftamcnt whcr-
in Chrift hath appeared to vs wrdi the preaching of his Gofpell cuen
to the day of nidgemciTt, is cxprelKrd by the laft hourc,thc laft times,
the Lift dates: to the end verily that contented with the pcrfedion of
the dodrinc of Chrift,wc (hould learnc ivcithcr to faine vs any ncwc
befidc it,or rcceiuc it fained of othcr.Thcrforc not without < aufe the
Father hath by lingulai" |Jrerogatiuc ordayned the Sonne to be our
Teacher:commaundinghim,andnotanyman,to be heard, He did- in
^at 17 ^^^^^ ^^ ^^^' wordes fet out his fchoolemaittcrfhip vnto v$,when he
;, fayd , hcare him : but inwhich there is more weight and force than
men commonly thinke.For it is as much in efJed,as if leading vs away
from all dpdrines of men, he (hould bring vs to him only,and com-
maud vs to iooke for al rhc dodrinc of faluation at him alonc,to hang
vpon him alone, to deaue to him alone , finally (as the very wordes
do found)ioharkctothcvoiceofhim alone.Andtruely what ought
there now to be cither looked for or dcfrred at the hand of man.whco
the very worde of iitc hath familiarly and openly difctofcd himfclfe
vnio
To Saluation. Lib.4. 480
▼hto vs?Yca but it is mccc that the mouthcs of all men be niuc,after
that hcjin whom the hcaucniy Father willed to hauc ai the trcafures
of knowledge and wifedome to be hiddcn,hach once fpoken.and (b
(pokcn as became both the wifdom of God(which is in no parte vn- loha.^.
, pcrfed) and Medias atwhofc handc thercuelationof ailthingesis 15.
hoped fonchac is co fay.that he left nothinge afterward for other to
be fpoken.
8 . Let this therfore be a ftcdfaft principle.'^ there is to be had n<»
other word of God, wherunto place (hould be giuen in the Church*
than that which is contained firil in the la we & the Prophets,& thea
in the writinges of the Apoillcs: and that there i> no other maner o£
teaching rightly,but accordinge co the prefcription and rule of thaC
word. Hereupon alfo we gather,that there was no other thing graua*
ted to the Apoftles,but that which y Prophets had had in olde timer
that is,that they (lioulde cxpounde the olde Scripturc,and (hew that
thofe thinges that are therein taught arc fulfilled in Chrid : and yec
chat they fhouldc not do the fame but of the Lord,that i$ tofay^che
Spirit of Chrili going before them, and after a certainc maner endi-
tinge wordes vnro them.For Chrift limited their embaffage with this
condition when he commaunded them to go and teache » not fuch ^^ '
thinges as they ihcmfclues had rafhely forged , but all thofe thinges
that he had commaunded them. And nothing could be more plainly Micaj
fpoken, than that which he fayth in an other place:but be not ye caU **
led mai(lers,for oncly one is your maifter, Chrift. Then,to emprinc^, , A
this more decpely in their minde , he rcpeateth it twife in the fame^'Yj'V
place. And becaufe their rudenes was fuch, that they could not coa^jyf*^
ceiue thofe thinges that rhey had hearde & learned of the mouth of 1 >*^ ^
their maiftcr,thcrfore the Spirit of trueth is promifed them,by whom loh. 14,
they (hould be diredcd to the true vnderHading of all things.For that %6.Sci4
(ame rcftraining is to be diligently noicd,wherethis office is ^idigned 'J*
CO (he holy Gho(i,to put the in mind of all thofe things y he before
taught them by mouth.
9 Therefore Peter who was very wel taught how much he mighc
lawfully do^le.iucth nothing either to himfelf or other,but to diftri-
bute the do^rine deliuered of God.Let him that fpeakcth(fay th he) ,.p^4»
fpcake as the words of God,y i<5 co fay,not doutingly, as they are wot n.
to tremble whofc own confciencc milgiucth thcm,but with furc con-
fidencc,w bccomethihe fcruat of God furnifhed with afTured in(ka«
ftions. What other thingc is this, but to forbid al inueiitions of mant
mindcjfrom what head foeuer ihey hauc procedcd,y the pnr^ word of
God may be heard & learned in the church of y faichful^co take awajr
Cap.8. Of the outward mcancs
the ordinances or rather the tayncd deui'es of ail men, of what de*
grce Joeuer they be, that the decrees of God onely may remainc in
forcef'Thefe be thofe fpiiitu?.llarmures,m!ghty throu-^h God locaft
downe holde.s : by which the fiithfull feruantes of God may throwc
downe counieiles , and all height that aduaimceth it fclfe againft the
knowledge of God , and may le.-dc all knowiidgc captiue to obey
Chrift.Lo this is the loueraigne power, wherewith it behoueth the
Paflofs of the Church to be endiicd , by what name foeuei they be
calledjthat is, that by tl,e word of God they may with conhdence be
bold to do all thmgescmay compell all the lfrcngth,glory,wifdom Si,
height of the world to yeelde and obey to his maiefly ; being vphol-
den by his power, may commaunde all cuen from the hieft to the
lowcft.may build vp the houfe of Chrift and pull downe the houfe of
Satanrmay ftede the Inecpe and driuc away the vvolues:may inftruft
and exhort the willing to Icarnc : may reproue,rchuke & fubdue the
rebellious and ftabbornermay bmde, and loolccfinaily may thunder
and hghtcn, if nede bc:but all thingc* in the word of God.Howbcit
^ there i$,as I haucfaidjthisdiftcrenccbawcnethe Apottlcs andtheif
fucceflorSjtbat the Apoftles were the ccrtaine and authentikc fecrc-t
tancs oftheiioly Ghoft, & therefore their wrytings are to be cftc-
mcd for the Oracles of God : but the other haue none other office^
but to teach that which is fct forth and written in the holy Scriptures,
We determine therefore, that this is not nowe left to faithfall miniw
ftcrsjihat they may coyne any new dodrine,but that they ought fim*^
ply to cleauc to y dodiinc,whefunto the lord h.ith made al me with-
out exception fubjcd. When 1 fay this,my meaninge is not onely to
ihew what is lavvfull for ail particular mcn,but alio wi .at i; lawfull for
the whole vniuerfall Church. Now as touchinge all particular men:
Q- Patiic verily was ordained by thfLorde Apoftle to the Corinthians.'
[^, but \h denicth that he haih dominion oucr their faith . Who nowe
d.ire take a dominion vpon himftlfe,whtch Paule teftifieth that it bc-^
longed nor to him ^ T he had acknowledged himfelfe to hc«ue this li-
bei ty of teachmgjth t whatfoeuer y Paftor tcacheth he may therein
of i liiht rccjuirc to be belcucd : he would neucr haue taught the Co-
rinthians this difciplinc,that while two or three Prophets fpeake^thc
reft fliouldiude;e,& if it were reuealed to any that fatCjthc fir ft (hould
holde 'lis peace. For fo he fpared none, whofe authority he made not
fubJi'd to the iudgemeniofthe word of God.Bui,wil ibme man fay,
of the whole vni'ierO^ll Church the cafe is orherwife . 1 anfwerc that
in nn other place P?.ule meeteth with this dout alfo, where he fayth,
lonj.io jjj^j PjjjIj jj |jy h€a«ng€,and hcaringc by the word o£Cod. TweU if
Faith
ToSaluatioEu Lib.4. 481
Faith hangofthc word of God only, hath rcrpcdvnto& rcfteth vpo
it alone, what place is there now left to y word of the whole world ?
For hcnn no ma may dout,^ hath wel knowe what Faith is. For Faith
ought to be (laid vpon fuch atTuredneSjWherby it may ftand inuinci'
ble ag^mft Satan, & ail the engines of the hcJs, & againft the whole
world.This aflurcdnes we flial no where find but in the only word of
God. Agam,u is a gcncrall rule which we here ought to haue rcfpc^
vnto:thac God doth therefore take from men the power to fet forth
a new dodrine, y he only m.iy be our (choolemaiQer in hcaucly Icar-
ninve, as lie only is true which can neither he nor decciuc.This rule
bclogcth no IclTe to y whole Church than to cucry one of^ faiihfulU
10 But if this power of the Church, which wc hauc fpokcn of,bc
compared with that powcr,whercof the fpiritual tyramcs,ihat hauc
fafly called thcfclucs Bifhops & Prelates of religion, hauc m certainc
ages paft boaftcd thcfelucs among the people of God,the agremenc
ihalbe no better than Chrift hath w BeUall. Yet it is not in this place
my purpofc to declare in what fort & with how wicked meanes they
haue exerdfed their tyranny : I will butrehcarfe the do(Srine,which
at this day they defende,firft with wriimg$,8c then with fwerd &firc.
Becaufc they take it for a thing confeffed, that a gcnerall Councell it
ihe true image of the Church , when they haue taken this prinople,
they do without dout determine , that fuch counccls are immediatly
gouerned of the holy Gholl, & that therefore they can not errc. But
wbcras tliey thcmfdues do rule,the councels,yca & make thcm,chey
do in dcde chalege to themfelucs whaifocuer they affirme to be due
to the Councels.Thcrfore they will haue our Faith to Hand & fall ac
their wil,that whatfoeuer they (hal determine on the one fide or the
other,mav be ftabliihed & certaine to our mindes ; Co f if they allow
any thing we muft allow the fame without douting:if they condcmnc
«ny tbtn^; we muft alfo hold it for codemned.Tn the meane time after
their owne luft,& defpifing the word of God, they coync dodrines^
to which afterward they require by this rule to haue Faith giuen. For
they alio fay that he is no Chriihan, that doth not certair4y confenc
to all their dodrines as well affirmatiue as negatiue : if not with ex-
preffedyct with vnexpreffcd Faith : becaufc it is in the power of the
Cburch,to make new articles of the Faith.
11 Firft let vs hearc by what ar^umentes they proue that thisaiu
thority is giuen to thf Church:and then we (hall fee how much that
maketh for the which they allcage of the Church. The Church(fajr
they) hath notable promifes, that it (hall neuer be forfaken of Chrift
her fpoufc.but that it fhalbe guided by his Spirit into all truch.But of
PPP
Cap,
^ .8, . Of the outward mcancs
the promifei Vfhich. they arc wont to alleage,many arc giuc no Icflb
to euery one of the faiihfull parcicularlyjchan to the whole Church
vniuerfally.For though the Lord fpakc to the twcluc Apoftlcs,whcn
Mat J 8 ^^ ^^'^' ^eholde I am with you cuen to the end of the world: Again;
3o. I will askc my Father,& he Ihall giuc you an other comfortcr.namc-
loh. 14. fy the Spirit of truthtyet he made the promife not only to the whole
* ^« number of the twelue, but aWb to euery one of th5 : yea to the other
dilciples likewifc, cither thofc that he had already rcceiucd,or thofc
that Ihould afterward be added to the.But when they expounde fuch
promifes ful of fingular-comfort,as though they were giucn to none
of the Chnftians, but to the whole Church together : what do they
dfe, but take away from all Chriftians that confidence which they all
oughc to recciuc thereby to cncoragc them? Yet I do nor here deny*
but that the whole felowlhip of the faithfull furnilhed with manifold
diuerfity of giftes,is endued with much larger & more plentiful trca*
fure of the heauenly wifedom , than eche one feuerally : neither is it
my meaningjthat this is fpoken in common to the faithful^as though
they were all alike endued with the Spiriteof vnderftanding and do-
ctrine; but becaufe it is not to be grauntcd,to y aducrfarics of Chrift»
that they fiioold for the defenfe of an euill caufc wrcft the Scripture
to a wronge fcnfc. Bt\t,ornittinge this,I fimply confefle that which is
i.Cor.t true,that the lord is perpetually prefcntwith his,& ruleth them widi
'*• his Spirite. And that this Spiriteis not the Spirit of errour.ignorancc,
lying or darkenefle : but of fure reuelation,wifdom,trueth,& hght,of
whome they not deceitfully may learne thofc thinges that are giuen
Iphc.i. thcm,thatistofay,wh'atisthehope of their caUing,& what be the ri*
1 i. chelTc of the glory of the inheritance of God in the faintes-But wher-
as the faiibfulljCuen they that arc endued with more excellent giftes
aboue che re{V,do in this fiefh recciuc only the firft firutes & a certamc
taftof that Spiritrthcrc rcmaineth nothing Iceucr to them than kno-
WHig their owne weakenes,to holde thcmfelues carefully within the
boiindcs of the word of God:lcaft,if they wander far after their owne
fenfe, they byandby ftray out of the right way , infomuch as they be
yet voidc of that Spiritc,by whole only teachingc trueth is difcerncd
PhilL 3. from falfhode. For all men do confefle with Paule,that they haue not
»!• yet attained to the marke . Therefore they more endeuour to daily
pf6fiting,than glory of perfedion.
12 But they wil take'excepti6,&fay that whatfocuer is particularly
attributed to euery one of the holy ones, the fame doth throughly Sc
fully belong to the Church it felfe. Although this hath fomc fccming
of trueth jyet I deny it tp be true.God doth in dcde Co diftributc to e<-
uery
ToSaluation, Lib.4. 4S1
Uety one of the members the gifts of his Spirit by mcafure,thac tlie
whole body wanteth nothmg ncccfl'ary,whcn the giftes are giuen in
common. But the nchefle of the Church arealway fuch, that there
cuer wanteth much of that hieft pcrfcdio, which our aducrfanes do
bo,*ft of.Yet the Church is not therefore foleftdettitute in any be-
halfe, but that Ihc alway hath (o much as is enough . For the Lordc
knoweth what her neceffuy rcquireth.But,to holde her vnder humi-
lity & k^odly moddlvjhe giucrh herno more than he knoweth to be
cxpedjent. I know what here alio they are wont to obic<it,that is,that p ,
chc Church is cleanfed with the wafliing of water in the word of life, ^ ,
that ictnight be without wrincle 8c fpoc, & that therefore in an other i .Tjm. 5
place K IS called the pillcr & rtay of truth. But in the fi: ft of tlefc two 1 5.
places IS rather taught, what Chnft daily worketh in it, ch.an what he
hath already done. For it he daily fandifieth, purgcth, polillicth, wi-
pcth from fpots all them that be his:rrucly itiscertainc that ihey arc
yet befprinkclcd with fome fpots and wrincles , and that there wan-
teth (bmwhat of their fandification.But how vainc and fabulous is ir,
to ludge the Church already in euery part holy & fpotlcfTcjwherof al
the members are fpotty and very vnclcanc ? It is true therefore that
the Church is fandified of Chrift. But onely the begin?iingc of that
fandifying is here fecne:but the end and ful accompliflimcnt ihalbe,
when Chrift the holycft of holy ones ihali truely and fully fill it with
his hohneflc. It is true alfo that the fpottes and wrincles of jc are wii
ped awayrbut To that they be daily in wipinge away,vntill Chrift with
his comrainge do vtterly take away all that remayneth . For vnleflc
5VC graunt this,wc muft of ncceflity affirme with the Pelagians , that
the righteoufneflc of the faythfuUis perfcd in this life:and with the
Cathani and Donatiftes we muft fuft'er no infirmitie in the Church.
The other place , as we haue elfe where feenc , hath a fenfc vtterly
ditferingc from that which they prctende. For when Paule hath in».
ftruded Timothee, and framed nim to the true office of a Bifhoppc»
he fayth that he did it to this purpofe,that he {houlde knowe how he
ought to bchaue himfelfe in the Church. And that he fhould with the
^greater rehgioufneffc and endeuour bende himfelfe ihcreunto,he ad-
deth that the Church is the very piller & ftay of trueth.For what elfc
."do thefe words meane, but that the tructh of God is prefcrued in the
•Oiurch,namely by the miniftery of preaching? As in an other place
he ceacbeth, that Chrift gaue Apoftles,Paftors & Teachers,ihat wc
•ftiGuldc no mort be caried about with euery winde of do(ftrine,oc be ^"^'^*
:inoGked of me; but that being cnhghtened with the true knowledge
of the Sonne of God,we ftiouldc altogether meete in vnity of Fayth,
" PPP ij
^
Cap.8. Of the outward meancs
Whereas therefore the tructh is not extinguilhed in the worId,but
rcmaineth rafe,that Came comcth to pafTe becaufc it hath y Church
a faithfull kcper of it^by whofc help & miniftery it is fuftained.But if
this keping ftandeth in the miniftery of the Prophets & Apoftlcs,it
folowcth that it hangcih wholly hereupon , if the word of the Lor4
be faithfully prcferued and do kepc his purity.
t J But that the readers may better vnderftande^vpon what point
this <^ueftion chiefly ftandcih, I will in few wordes declare what owr
aduerfarics require^and wherein we ftand againft them. Where they
fay that the Church can not erre,it tendcth l;ercunto,and thus thcj
cxpounde it,that forafmuch as it is gouerncd by the Spirit of God,it
may go falfely without the word ; that whctherfocuer it gocth,it can
not thinke nor fpeake any thing but trueth:that therefore if it deter*
mine any thing without or befidc Gods word, the fame is no othcr.<
w| ^ ^ wife to be efteemed than as a ccrtaine Oracle of God. If wc graunc
19 ' ' ^,thai firft point, that the Church cannot errcinthingesnccciTary to
^ faluation,this is our ificaningc,that this is therfore becaufe forfaking
all her owne wifedom, (he fuftcreth her felfc to be taught of the holy
Ghoft by the word of God.This therefore is the djffercncc.Thcy fet
the authority of the Church without the worde of God, but wc will
that it be annexed to the worde,& fuffcr it not to be feucred from it.
And what maruel is it,if the fpoufe & fcholar of Chrift be fubicd to
her husband & fchoolemaifter,that fhe continually & earncftly han-
geth of his mouth ^ For this is the order of a well gouemed houCc»f
the wife ihould obey the authority of the husband:& this is the rule
of a wel ordered fchoole.that the teaching of the fcholemaifter alone
fhould there be heard. Wherefore let the Church not be wife of her
fclfe^not thinke any thing of her felfc:but determine the endc of her
wifdoni where he hath made an end of fpeaking. After this mancr (he
fiiall alfo diltruft all the inuentions ot her owne reafon •• but in thofc
things wherin it ftandeth vpon y word of God,flie flial wauer With no
difVruftfulnes or doutmg,but ftial reft with great affurednes & ftedfaft
ccnttancy. So alfo trufting vpon the largencs of thofe promifes that
(he hath,flie fhal haue whereupon aboundantly to fuftaine her faith.'
that {he may nothinge dout that the bcft guide of the right way the
holy Spirit is alway prefent with her: but therewithal! (he thall kcpe
in memory what vfc the Lord woulde haue vs to receiuc of his holy
loh.i 6. Spurit.Thc Spirit(ray th he)which I wil fend fro my Father,fhal leade
y.fic i 3. yQu jj^f y al truth.But how?becaufc(faith he)hc flial put you in minde
of all thofc things that I haue toldc you. Therfore he giucth warning
that there is nothing more to be lookc4for of his Spirit^ but that he
ifiouia
To Saluation. Lib.4. 483
ffiould enlighten our mindcs to pcrcciuc the troech of his dodiine.
Therefore Chryfoftomc faith excellently well. Many (faith he) do
boaft of the holy Spirite ; but they which fpeake their owne do falfly ^J^^"^^'
pretcndc that chey haue him.As Chrift tcftified that he fpake not of ^^ g^ ,'^
nimfelfc:becaufe he fpake out of the law and the Prophets;fo if any doiand.
thing bcfide the Gofpel be thruft in vndcr the title of the Spuit,lct vs Spiri..
not bcleuc it bccaufe as Chrift is the fulfillinge of the law & the Pro- ^°^y **
phets:fo is the Spirit,of the Gofpcl.Thefe be his words.Now it is ca- J^^ '*
fie to gather how wrongefuUy our aducrfaries do,wh)ch boaft oithc yyJ> ^^
holy Ghoft to no other ende, but to fet forth vnder his name ftrangc _/^>
&foraine do(ftrines from the wordof God: wherashc will with vn-* ii/v
fpeakeable knot be coioined with tlic word of God,& the fame doth — -*
Chrift profeflc of him when he promifcth him to his Church.So is it
truly.VVhat fobriety y lord hath once prcfcribed to his church,y fame
he will haue to be perpetually kept. But he hath forbidden her. j fhe
£hold not adde any thing to his word,nor take any thing fro it.This is
the inuiolahle decree of God & of y holy Ghoft , which our adireria-
f ies go about to abrogate , when they faine that the Church is ruled
of the Spirit without the word*
14 Here againe they murmure againft vs,and fay that it bchoued
that the Church fliould adde fome things to the writinges of the A-
poftles, or that they theltlues rtiould afterward with huely voice fup*
ply many thingcs which they had not clearly enough taught,namely
(ith Chrift faid vnto the. I haue many things to be (aid to you,which ^
you can not now beare ; & that thefe be the oidinance$,which with- ^t ^ ^
out the Scripture haue bin rccciucd oncly in vfe & maners. But what i ,/
fliamelelnciTc is this ? I graunt the difciples were yet rude,& in a ma-
ner vnapt to learnc,whc the Lord fayd this vnto them.But were they
then alio holden with fuch dulncs, whe they did put their dodrine in
wrytinge, that they afterward needed to fupply with liuely voice that
which they had by fault of ignorance gmitted in their wrytings.^But
if they were already led by the Spirite of trueih into all trueth when
they did fet foortb their wrytmges : what hindrcd that they haue not
therein contained & left written a perfcd knowledge of the dodrinc
of the GofpcL^But go to:let vs graunt them that which they require.
Only let them point out what be thofe thingc s that it behoued to be
reuealed without writir>g.If they dare enterprifc that,I wil aflaile th|
with Auguftines wordcs:that is.When the Lord hath fayd nothingc
pf them,which of vs dare fa/jthefe they be or thofe they bc?or if any , ?^'!!
dare fay fo,whereby doth he proue it?But why do T ftriue about a fu-
pprftyp!^ maKer /For » very cbildc doiii IaK>^^» that in the wry tinges
I PPP iij
Cap.8. Of the outward mcanes
of the Apoftles, which thefc men do make in a maner lame and hut
halfe perfed, there is the fruie of that reuelatio which the Lord did
then promife them. '
1 5 WhatPfay they,did not Chrift put out of coniroucrGc whatfo-
eucr the Church teacheth & decreecli,whcn he commaundeih him
to be take for a heathen man & a Publicane that dare fay againft her?
Firfl in that place is no mention made of do<Srine, but onely the au-
tliority of the cenfures is cftabhfhed for corrcdingof vices>that they
which haue bin admonilhed or rebuked (hould not re(;ft her iudgc-
ment. But omitting this, it is much maruellithat thefe lofcls haue Co
litle fli.in)Cjthai they dare be proudc of cht'.tpiace.For what flialthey
get thcrby,buc that the colent of the Church is neuer to be defpifed,
which ncuer cofeiiteth but vnto the trueth of the word of God?The
Church is to b-s heard,fay they. Who denieth it?forafmuch as it pro*
nounceth nothing but out of the word of y Lor d.lf they require any
more let them know that thcfe words of Chrift do nothing take their
part therm.Ncicher ought \ to be thought too much cotentious be-
caufc I ttande fo carneftly vpon this point,That it is not lawcfuU for
the Church to make any new dodrine, that is,to teach & deliuer for
an Oracle any more than y which the lord hath reuelcd by his word.
For men of founde wit do (ec howe great daunser there is,if (b great
authority be once graunted to men. They fee alfo howe wide a win-
dow is opened to the mockings & cauillaiions of the wicked,if we fay
that that which me haue iud^ed is to be taken for an Oracle amon^
Chrifiians.Befide that,Chrifk fpeaking according to the confideratip
of his ownc time, giueth this name to the Sinagogc, that his difciples
(hould afterward learne to reuerence holy aflcmblies of the Church.
So (hould it come to paffe that euery city & village (hould haue egall
authority in coyning of dodrincs
\6 The examples which they vfc, do nothing heipe them. They
fay that the Bapti(ingc of infantes , proceeded not fo much from the
cxprefl'e commaundemet of the Scripture as from the decree of the
Church. But it were a very miferable fuccour , if we were compelled
to flee to the bare authoritie of the Church for dcfcnfeof the Bap-
tifme of infantes: but it (hal in an other place fufficiently appearc that
it \i farre othcrwifc.Likewife whereas they obied that y is no where
founde in the Scripture, which was pronounced in the Niccne Sy-
node, that the Sonne is confubftantiall with the father ; therein they
do great wrong to the fathcrs,as though they had ra(hly condemned
Arrius,hecaufe he would not fwcare to their wordes, when he pro-
kSkd all chat dodrine which is comprehended in the writings ot the
Prophets
To Saluation. Lib4. 484
Prophets & Apoftles. This vvord,I graum,is not in the Scripturc:buc
when therein is Co oft affirmed , that there is but one God , againe
Chrift is Co oft called the true and cternall God, one with the Father.*
what other thing do the fathers of the Nicenccouncelwhc they de-
clare that he is of one fubftaccbut (imply fct out the natural fenfc of
the Scripture ? But Theodoritc reporteth that Conftantinc vfed this Hillo.
preface in their aflerably.In difputations(faiih he)of diuine matters^ eccl.li.,
there is a prcfcribed do(^rinc of the holy Ghott : the bookes of the ^^P* $•
Gofpels & of the Apoftle$,with the Oracles ofthc Prophcts,do fully
fhew vs y meaning of God. Thcrfore laying away difcordc.let vs take
the difculfinges ofqueftions out of the wordcs of the Spirite. There
was at that time no man that fpake againft thefe holy monitions.No
man tooke cxecption, that the Church might adde fomewhat of her
fOwne:that the Spirit reueled not all things to the Apoftles,or at leaft
vttcred them, not to thofe that came aftenor any fuch thing. If it be
true which our aduerfaries wouldc hauc ; Hrft , Conftantine did cuill»
that tooke from the Church her authority:thcn, wheras none of the
Bi(hops at that time rofe vp to defend itj this was not without breach
of their faith : for fo they were betraiers of the right of the Church,
But fith Theodoritc rehcarfeth that they wiUingely embraced that
which the Emperour fayd y it iscertaine that this newe do^lrine was
then vctcrly vnknowcn.
N
The ix. Chapter,
of CounctU and of their anthority, '
Owe , although I graunt them all thinges conccrningc the
Church: yet they ffiall thereby not much prcuaile for their
I ^ intent. For whatfoeueris fayd of the Church,the fame they
•^ byandby giuc to y Councels,forafmuch as in their opinion
thofe reprefcnt the Church. Yea where they fo ftifFely contendc for
the power of the Church,they do it of no other purpofe,but to giue
all that they can get to the bilhop of Rome 6c his gard. But ere I be-
gin to difcufle this cjucftion , I muft nedes here make proteftation of
two things aforchand.Firft,that where I Hiall in this point be fome»
what rough,it is not becaufe I lelTc efteme the oldc Councels than I
ought to do.For I reucrence them from my hart>& wifh them to be
had in their due honor with al! men.But here in is fome meane,thae
is,that there be nothingc withdrawen from Chrift . Nowc this is the
right of Chrift.to be the head in all Counce!s}S( to hauc no man fe«
low with ):dta in chis dignity. Buc I fay tliac then only he is the hea^?
PPP iiii
Cap.p. Of the outward mcancs
when he goucrncth the whole aflembly with his wordc & SpiritSe*
conciIy,wheras I giue lefTe to CounceU than the aducrfaries require.
I do it not for this caufe that I am afraid of the Counccls,as chough
they did make for their tide,& were againd ours.For as we are abou-
dandy furnifhcd with the word of the Lord to the full proofc of our
ovvnc dodrioe fully,& to the oucrthrowe of the wliolc Papiftry that
we nedc not much to dcfire any other thing betide it:fo if the matter
require,the old Councels do for a great part mimdct vnto vs fo much
as may fuffice for both.
2 Nowclcttcvsfpcakeofthc thing it felfc. Ifit be fought of the
Scriptures, what is the authority of Counccllcf : there is no plainer
laci 9, promife than in this faying of Chnft: Where two or three flialbc ga-
thered together in my name,there I am in the middcft of them. But
tliat doth no lefTe belong to cuery particular aflembly tha to a gene-
ral Councel.But the dout of the qu^ ftion ftaudc th not therin:but bc»
caufe there ii a condition added.that God wil fo only be in the mid-*
deft of the Councel,if it be gathered together in his name.Therfore
although our aduerfaries do a choufand times name Councels of bi»
ihops,they fhaUitle preuail:ncither Ihalthey make vs to beleue that
which they affirme,that is,that they be goucrned of the holy Ghoft,
vnril they haue proued that they are gathered together in the name'
of Chrift.For it is as poffiblc that wicked & cull Bilhops may cofpire
againft Chrift , as good & honeft Bilhops may come together in his
name, Foraveiyclearcproofe hereof arc many decrees thathauc
preceded from fuch Councels. But this Ihalbe (cen hereaftcr.Now I
do but an/were in one word,thatChrift promifeth nothing,but to the
that are gathered together in his name. Let v$ therefore define what
eut.4, ^^^tis.Ideny thatthey ^^ gathered rogciherinthename of Chrift,
which cafting away the comaundemt nt of God, wherein he forbid-
eu.2 1 Jeth any thing to be added to his word,or taken from it,do decree c-
• uery thing after their ownc wihwhich beinge not contented with the
Oracles of y Scripture,that if to fay the only rule of perfed wifdom,
do imagine fome new thing of their own hed.Surely iith Chrift hatl^
not promifed that he wil be prefent at all CounceIs,but hath adioyr
ned a peculiar marke,wherby to make true & lawful Councels diffe-
rent from otherrit is mete that we fhould not negled this difference.
ala.x. This is the couenant,which in old time God made wjth the Liuitical
Prieftsjj^ they (hould teach out of his mouth.This he alway required
of the Prophets:thisiaw alfo we fee to haue bin laid vpon y Apoftles.
Who fo breake this couenat,God doth not vouchfaue,co let thehauf^
che honoc of Pricfthoode^oor any auchorityXct the aducrfaries vndo
inc
To Saluation. Lib.4. 485
jgoe this knocte , if thcy-wiU make my faith bon<le to the decrees of
men bcfidc the word of God.
^ For whcras they thinke not thattruch remameth in the Church,
vnlcfTc it be among the Paltours: & that the Church it felfc fiadeth
notjvnleire it appearc in general Councels :that is farre from haumg
bene alway true,if che Prophets haue left vnto vs true teftimonics of Efa. jtf,
their ownc times. There was in the time of Efaic a Church at Hje- *^*
rufalcm,which God had not yet forfakcn.But of the partors he faith
thus : The watchmen arc all blinde , neither knowe they any thing.
They arc all dumme dogges,ncither are they able to barke.Tlicy lie
along & nepe,and loue flepinge : and the Paftors themfelues knowe
noihin^,nor do vnderftade : and they do altogether loke backe vnro ofee,^,
their owne wayes. After the fame maner Ot'ec fayeth : The watchc- 8.
man of Ephraim with God,thc fnaxeofthe fouler , hatred in the
houle of God. Where loining them with God by way of mockage,
he teacheth y rheir pretenle of the priefthod is vaine. The Church
alfo endured vnto the time ot HieremicLet vs heai e what he fayeth
of the Paftors. From the Prophet euen to the pricft , cuery one foU Hier.«.
loweth lying. Againe. The Prophets do prophecie a ly in my name, ' l
when] haue not fcnt them, nor commaunded them. Andleaftwc '^''•''*
(hould be to long in reciting his wordes, let thofe things be red that
he hath written in the whole. xxiij. and. xl. chapiters. At that time on e«. %%,
the other fide Ezechieldid no more gently inueyagainftihe fimc i$.
men. The confpiracie (fayeth he) of the Prophets in the middes of
her as a roaring lyon , and that violently taketh his pray. Herpricfts
haue broken my lawe , and haue dtfiled my holy things, and haue
ipade no difference betwcene holy and prophanc : and the rell that
he adioineth to the fame cffed.Like complaintes are euery where m
the Prophets,fo that nothing is ofter found in them.
- 4 But perhappes it might be that that was fo among the lewcs:
hut our age is free from fo great an euill. I would to God in deedc it
were fo : but the Holy Ghoft hath geuen warning that it fhalbc farre
otberwife. The wordes of Peter are plaine. As (fayeth he) there *'P«c.»
vcre in the olde people falfe Prophets , fo (hall there alfo be among
you faifc teachers , flily bringing in fcdes of perdition. Sec you not
howe he fayth , that there is daunger to come , not by men of the
common people,but by them that fhal boft themfelues with the title
of teachers & Payors? Moroeuer howe oft hath it bene fo; cfpokcn ^^^ *J
byChrift and his Apoftles, that there (hould very great daunger* ^L^
hang ouer the Church by the Paftors JYeaPauleplainelyfhcweth, a.TheC
that Anuchri^i ihajil (kt in no other place than in the temple of Go6» *'^
Cap.p. Of the outwardc mcancs
Whereby he fignificth,that the horrible calamitie of which he there
fpcakcthjrtiall come from no where els but from them that fhall fitt ,<
in ftcedc of Pallors in y Church. And in an other place he ihewetfe-'H -
that y beginnings of fo great a mifchicf are cuen alredy ncre at had
Aft.20. For when he fpeaketh to the biftiops of Ephcfus.I know (fayeth he)
*^» that after my departure there Ihall enter into you rauening wolues
not fparingthe flocke- And they flialbc of your owne felues,that
ihall Ipcake pctuerfe things , toleade away difciples after them.
Howe much corruption might a long courfe of y cares bring among
Paftors, when they could fo farrc go out of kindc in fo famall a fpace
of time? And, not to fill much paper with reherfing the by name:we
are admonifhed by the examples in a maner of all ages, that neither
the truth is alway nouriflied in the bofome of the paftors , nor the
fafetieof the Church doth hangvpon their ftate. They ought in
decde to hauc bene the goucrnours and kepers of the peace and
fafetic of the Church,for prefcruation whereof, they arc ordcined:
but it is one thing for a man to performe that which he oughc.and an
other thingc to owe that which he performeth not.
t Yet let no man lake thcfc our wordes in fuch part,as though I
would cuery where and rafhely without any choife diminilh the au-
thoritie of Paftors. I do but onely admoniili that cuen among Pa-
^ ftorsthemfeluesthereisachoife tobeehad, tbatwe fliouldnoiim-
mediatly thinke them to be paftors that arc fo called . But the Pope
with all his flocke of bifhops , vpon none other reafon , but bccaufc
they are called paftors , fhaking away the obedience of the word of
Godjdo tamble & toffe al things after their own luft:& in the meane
time they trauaile to pcrfuadc , that they can not be deftitutc of the
light of truth , that the fpirit of God perpetually abideth in them,
that the Church confifteth in them and dicth with them. As though
there be nowe no iudgements of the Lord, whereby he may punilh
the world at this day with the fame kindc of punil}iment,wherewith
fomtime he toke vengeance of the vnthankefulnclTe of the olde peo*-
lacha. plcjthat is,to ftriJcc the Paftors with blindneffe and amafed dulineflc.
i».4. Neither do they moft fooli/h men vnderftande , that they fing the
fame fong, which thofc in olde time did fing that warred againft the
Hicr.18 word of God.For the enemies of Hieremie did thus prepare them-
*^' felues againft the truth:Come,& we will imagine imaginatios againft
Hieremie;forafmuch as the lawc fhall not perifti from the Prieft,not
counfell from the wifcman,nor the word from the Prophet.
6 Hereby it is eafy to aunfwer to that other obicdion c6cerning
generall councelis. Ic can noc be dcnic4 but that the lewcs had a
To Saluation. Lib.4. 48^
true Church in the time of the Prophets.Buc li there had then bene
a gcnerall counccll gathered together ot the priefts,whai mancr face
of the Church had there appcredHVe heare what God fauhjnot to Hicr.4.
one or two of them but to the whole order ; The prieftesfhalbc^*
aftonied.and the prophets Ihalbe made afraide. Againc,thelawc
(hall perilli from the pricft , and counccil from the Elders. Againe, txeof*
Night (halbe to you infteede of a vilion , and darkcnefle in fteedeof J^.-
prophecieng : and the funne rtiall fall downe vpon the Prophets, and ^ '^ '*'
be darkened vpon thefe dayes. &c. Well *. if all fuch had then bene
gathered together in one , what Spirit fhould haue gouerncd in that
aflembiie ? of that thing we haue a norable example in that counccll
which Achabc.illed together . There were prefem fourc hundred i Km.
Prophets. Bui^ccaufe they were come together of nootherminde **•*•*
but to flatter the wicked king:therefq>re Satan was fent of the Lord to ***
be a lymg fpirit in the mouth of the all. There by all their voices the
truth was condemned Micha was condemned for an herctike,ftrikeo
and caft in prifon.So was done to Hicrcmie,fo to the other Prophets.
7 But let one example fufifice for jll,which is more notable then
the reft. In that councell which the bifhops and Pharifces gathered loh.ii,
at Hicrufalera againft Chrilt , what can a man fay that there wanted, 47»
in fo much as pertained to the outwarde (hcwc ? For if there had not
then bene a Church at HierufalemjChiift would neuer haue commu-
Bicate with their facrificcs and other ceremonies. There was made
sfolcmnefummoning of them together: the hy bifhop fat as (hicf:
the whole order of priefts fat by himryet Chriil was there condc ned,
and his doiftrine driuen away. This doing is a profe that the Church
was not enclofed m that councell. But there is no perill that any fuch
thing fhould happen to vs. Who hath gcuenvs affurance thereof?
For It is not without fault of fluggilhnefTc , to be to carelelTc in fo
great a matter. But where the Holy Ghoft doth with expicfle wordcs
prophecie by the mouth of Paule,that there fhall come a departing 1. tktC
(which can not come but that the Paflors muft be the fitft that fhall ^^
forfakc God) why are we hering wilfully blindc to ourowncdef-
trudion? Wherefore it isinnowjfe to be grauntcd, that the Church
confiftcth in the companie of Paftors , for whom the Lorde hath no
where vndertaken that they ihall perpetually be good , but he hath
pronounced that they fhall Ibmtime be euill. But when he warneth
vs of the daun^cr,he doth it to this entente to make vs the water.
8 What then ? wilt thou fay : Shall the counccUs haue no aa-
thoritie in determining ? Yes forfooth. For neither do 1 here argue
that all counccll^ are co be condemned , or all their a^es to be re*
Gap.p. Of the outward mcancs
pellecl,or (as the faying is) to be defaced with one blottc. But (thott
Wilt fay to mc) thou bringeft them all into fubicdionjthatit may Se
free for cuery man to rccciuc or refufc that which the councells haue
determined. Not fcBut io oft as y decree of any counccll is brought
foonh , I would haue it Hrft to be diligently weyed , at what time it
was holden, for what caufe it was holden, what maner of men were
prefent : and then the very thmg that is intreated of,to be examined
by the rule of the Scripture: and that in fuch forte as the determi-
nation of the councell may haue his force, and be as a forciudged
icntencc , and yet not hinder the aforefaid examination. I would to
God all men did kepc that moderation which Auguftine prcfcnbeth
in the third boke againft Maximinus.For when he minded brefcly to
put to filcce this heretike cotcnding about the Decrees of counccis:
Neither ( fayth he) ought I to obicdt againft thee the Synodcof
Nice»nor thou againft mc the Synode of Aiiminum, as to the cntct
to conclude one an other by foreiudgcd fcntecejneither am I bound
by the authoritie of the one.nor thou of the other. By authorities of
Scriptures,not fuch as are proprc to cither onc,but fuch as arc com»
mon to both , let there fti iue matter with matter , caufe with caufe,
reafon with reafon. So rtiould it come to pafle, that councells ll^ould
h«ue the maieftie that they ought: but in the mesne (cafon the
Scripture fhould be alone in the hicr place,that there might be no-
thing that (hould not be fubicd to the rule thereof.So theie olde Sy-
nodes,as of Nice, of Conftantinople, the firtt of Ephefus, of Chair
ccdon, and fuch other> which were holden for confuting of errors,
we willinoly embrace and rcucrcnce as holy , fo much as bclongeth
to the dodrines of faith : for they conteine nothing but the pure and
naturall expofitio of Scripturc,which the holy fathers with fpirituall
wifdome applied to the fubduing of the enemies of religion that
then rofc vp. In fomc of the later councells alfo , we fe to appere a
true zele of godlinefle,& plaine tokens of witt,learning,and wifdom^
But as things arre wonte commonly to growe ro worfe,wc may fe by
the later counceU$,howe much the Church hath nowe and then de-
generate from the pureneffe of that golden age. And I doute not bu?
that in thefe corrupter ages alfo, councells haue had fome bifhoppe$
of the better forte. But in thefe the fame happened which the Sena-r
tors themfclues complained to be not well done in making of ordi?
nances of the fenarc at Rome. For while the fentcccs are numbred,
not weyed , it is of necefljtie that oftentimes the better part is ouer-
comeofthc greater. Truely they brought forth many wicked fen-
fences. Neither is it here necdefyll to gather the fpeciall examples ^
To Saluation. Lib4. 48;^
etcher bccaufc it llioulci be to long, or bccaufc other hauc done it fo
dihgcntly that there can not much be added.
^ Nowc , what necde I to rehcrfe Coupcclls difagreing with
councclls? And it is no caufe that any (hould murmurc againft mc,
and fay, that of thofc councclls that difagree the one is not lawefulL
For, howc (hail wc ludgc that? By this , if I be not dccciucd, th«t w»
ihall iudge by the Scriptorcs,that y decrees thereof arc nocagreabU
with trucdodrinc. For this is the onely certaine lawc todifcernc
ihcm by .It is nowe about nine hundred ycarcs ago, fins the Synodc
of Coftantinoplc gathered together vndcr Leo the Emperour.iudgcd
that images fettc vp in Churches (hould be ouerthrowen,and broken
in pecces. A littell afterward , the counccl of Nice , which Irene the
Emprcflc aflTemblcd m fpitc of him, decreed that they (hould be rcf-
torcd. Whether of thefc two (hall wc acknowledge for a iaweftdl
councell ? The later which gauc images a place in Churches , hath
preuailed among the people. But Augu(line faith that that can not
be done without moft prefent penilof idolatric. Epiphanius which
was before in time , fpeaketh much more fliarply : for he faith thacit
is wickcdne(rc and abhomination to hauc images feen in a Church of
Chrilhans. Woldc they that fo fpeake, allowc that councell, if they
were aliuc at this day? But if both the hiftorians tell truth , and the
very ades be beleucd,not onely images themfeloes , but alfothe
worihipping of ihcm was there rccciued. But it is euidencchat fuch
a decree came from Satan. Howe fay you to this ', that in deprauing
and tearing the Scripture, they (he we that they made a mocking
ftockc of It? Which thing] hauc before fufficiently made open.
Howefoeuer it bc,we fhall no otherwife be able to difccmc bctwenc
contraric and difagreing Synodcs, which were many, Tnlcfle we trie
them all by that balance of all men and angels, that is, by the word
of the Lorde. So we embrace the Synode of Chalcedon , refuting
the fccode Synodc of Ephcfus,becaufe in this latter oncthe wicked-
ncfle of Eutiches was c6Hrmed,which the other former condtn^ped.
•This thing holy men hauc fudged none otherwife but by the Scrip-
ture : whom we fo followe in iudging ; that the worde of God which
gauc liohc to them doth alfo nowe geue light to vs. Nowc let the
Romaniftes go and boaft , as they are wont, that the Holy Ghoft it
£iftned and bound to their councclls. "^ ': • 'i = ' c^. "■■
10 Howbeit there is alfo (omwhat which a man may well thinke
to be wanting in thofc auncicnt and purer councclls : cither becau^
they that then were at them,bcHig otherwif* learned and wife mcn^
wholly bent to the bufinciTc then mhande, did notforcfee manj^
Cap.p. Of the outwarde mcancs
other things, or for that many things of hghter importance efcaped
them being bufied with weightier and more earneft matters : or for
that fimply , as bcying menne they might be deceiued with vnf kil-
fulncflfc : or for that they were fbmetimc caried headlong with to
mirch aftVrdion. Of this laft point (which feemeththe hardeftof
all) there was a plaine example in the Nicene Synode , the dignitie
whereof h^th by confcnt of all men, as it was worthy, bine receiued
with molt hy reuercnce. For when the principal! article of our faith
was therein daunger , Arriusthe enemie was prefenc in redinefic^
with whom they mufi fight handetohande, and the chicfe impor-
lancclay in the agremctof them that came prepared to fight againft
the error of Arrius, thi^ not withftanding, they carclcfle of fo great
daungers,yca ask were hauins: forgotten grauitie , modeftie and all
humanitic , leaning the batrell that they had in hand, as if they had
come ihether of purpofe to do Arrius a pleafure , began to wound
thcmfclues with inward di(rentions,and to tourne againft themfelues
the ftile that (hould haue bene bet againft Arrius. There were hcarde
fowlc obiedings of crimcs,therc were fcattcrcd bokcs of accufatios*
and there would haue bene no cnde made of c6tentions,vntrll chey
<had with mutuail woundes one deftroyed an other , vnlefle the Em-
peror Conftaptin had prcueted it,which profeffing that the exami-
■nmg of ihejr life wasamatter aboue his knowledge, and chaftilcd
ifuch intcmperacc rather with praife than with rebuking. Howe many
wayes is it credible that the other councells alfo failed , which fol-
lowed afterward ? Neither doth this matter ncede long profic. For
if a man reade ouer the ades of the councclls,hc (hall note therm
many infirmities : though I fpcake of nothing more greuotis.
1 1 And Leo billiop of Rome fticketh not to charge with ambi-
tion and vnaduifed ralhneffe, the Synode of Chalcedon , which yet
he confeflcth to be founde in dodrines. He doth in deede not denic
that it was a lawful! Synode : but he openly affii meth , that it might
cri^. Some man pcraduenture will thinke me fonde , for that 1 bufy
my felfc in (hewing fuch crrorsrforafmuch as our aduerfaries do con-
fcflcjtl'.at councells may erre in thofc things that arc not ncccflfary to
faluation. But this labor is not yet fuperfluous. For although becaufc
they are compelled, they do in deede confeflc it in word : yet when
they thruft vnto vs the determimation of all councells in euery mat-
ter whatfoeuer it bc,for an oracle of the Holy Ghoft,they do therin
require more than they tokc at the beginning. In fo doing what do
they affirme, but that councells can not crre:or if they erre, yet it is
not lawcfuUfor vs to fee the u:uth,or not to footh their errors > And
I intend
To Saluation. Lib.4. 405
I intend nothing cIs, but that it may thereby be gathered that the
HolyGhoft fogoucrncd the godly and holy Synodcs, that in the
incaiic time he fuftrcd fomcwhat to happen to them by the nature
of naen , left wc (hould to much trutt to men. This Is a much better
fentcnce.tha that of Gregory Nazianzene,that he neucr faw agood
end of any councel.For he y aftirmcth j all without exceptio ended
ill.doth not leaue them much authoritic. It is nowe nothing ncedc-
full to make mention fcuerally of prouinciallcounqclls: forafrrmch
as it is ea(y to ludgc by the gcncraU,how much aathorinc they ought
to haue to make newe articles of faith and to receiuc what kmdc of
do^rinc focuer it pleafech them.
1 2 But our Romanics , when they (ec that in defence of their
caufe all hcJpe of rcafon doth faile them, do rcfort to chat extreme &
iniferable(hift;that although the men themfclues be blockish in wit
and councell,and moft wicked in minde & will,y et the word of God
remaineth , which commaundeth to obey Rulers. Is it fo ? what if I
dcnie that they be rulers that are fuch? For they ought to take vpoq
themfelues,no more tha lofua had,which was both a Prophet ot the
Lorde,and an excellent paftor. But let vs hcare with what wordes he
is fet by the Lorde into his office. Let not (fayth he) the volumcof loQuuu
this lawe depart from thy mouth : but thou (halt ftudie vpon it daycs /•
and nights. Thoulhalt neither bowe to the right hand nor tothc
leftthen {halt thou dire«fl thy way and vnderftande it.They thercfprt
fjialbe to vs fpirituall rulers which (hall not bow from the lawe of the
Lord.ncither to v one fide nor to the other.But if the doftrine of aA
paflors wiiattbeuer they be,is to be receiued without any douting,t<>
what purpofc was it that wc ihould fo ofc & fo earneftly be admoni-
flicd not to barken to the fpeche of falfe prophetes. Here not (faith
he by Hieremic ) the words of the prophets that prophecie to yoiv Wi«. »j.
For they teach you vanitie,& not out of y mouth of the Lord. Again, **
Beware you of falfe prophets,ihat come vnto you in fhepes clothings * ^*
but inwardly are raueningwolues.And lohn fliould in vaine exhort ij'^^t
vSjthatwcfhouldprouethe Spirits, whether they beof God. Froin 4.1. • •
which iudgement the very Angels are not exeptcd.much lefle Satan Maui^
with all his lies. What is to be faid of this faying:if |he blind lead tho ****
blindjthey (hall both fall into y ditch?Doth »t not fuflficicdy declare,
that it is of great importance what maner of prophets be heard, and
that not all are rafhely to be heardrWherforc there is no rcafon tha|;
they fhould make vs afraid witli their titles, thereby to drawe vs into
partaking of their blindnefle : forafmuch as wc fee on the other lide,
that the Lorde haddc a fingular care to fray vs away from fuftripg
I
Cap.p, Of the outwarde meancs
our (clues to be led with other mens error, vnder what vifor of nam«
focucritlurkcth.Forif the aunfwer of Chrift be true, theft all bhndc
guides, whether they be called fathersof the Church, or prelates,
or bifhops , can do nothing but drawe their partners into the fame
headlong downefall.Whcrefore let no names of councells^Paftors,
biihops , ( which may as well be falfcly pretended as truely vfcd,)
hmder vs,but that being taught by Iclfons both of words and exam-
plcs,we may examine all fpirits of all men by the rule of the word of
God,that we may proue whether they be of God or no.
ij Forafmuch as we haue proued that there is not geuen to the
Church a power to fet vp a ncwe dodrine, nowe let vs fpeake of the
power which ihey attribute vnto it in expouding of Scripiure.Truly
we do willingly i;raut,that if there happen debate about any do<fii ine^
there is no better nor furcr remedy than if a Synodc of true bifhops
aifemble together, where y doctrine in cotroucrfie may be difcuffcd.
For fuch a determinacion,whercunto the Paftors of Churches jliall
agree in common together , calling vpon the Spirit of Chrift , fhall
haue much greater force,than if euery one feucrally fhould conceiue
it at home , andfo reach \t to the people, or if a fewc priuate metk
ihould make it. Againe, when bifhops arc gathered in one, they do
the morecommodioufly take aduife in common , what and in what
forme they ought to teach, leaft diuerfitie fhould brede offence,
Thirdcly Paule prefcribcth this order in difccroing of dodrines;For
whereas he gcucih to cucry fcuerall Church a power to difcerne , fee
Iheweth wharis theord^^rof doingin weightier causes : thit is, that
the Churches fhould take vpon them a common iriall of the matter
togethcfi. And fo doth the very feeling of godlincffc inftrudc vs,thac
if any man trouble the Church with an vnwonted dodrmc , and the
1« matter p*ocede fo fane that there be perill of greater diffentionahtf
Churches fhould frft mete toget-hcr , and examine the queftion pro-
jwundcd.at laft, after iult difcufTing had, bring forth a determination
t Cor. taken out of the Scripture , fuch as may both take awav douting out
^4»a^. of the pcoplc,and ftoppe thcmouthes of wicked & gredy men,that
'<^ ' they may not be fo hardy to procede any furthcr.So when Arius was
r»ftn,the Niccne Synode was gatheredtogether, which with the au-
ihorttie thereof both did brcake the wicked endeuors of the vngodly
man, and reftori'd peace to the Churches, which he had vexedi and
defended the eternall godhead of Chrift, againfi his blafphemous
dofirine. When afccrwarde Eunomius and Macedonius fiirred vp
iicwe troubles , their madnefTe was refifted with like remedie by the
Synode of C^ftantinuplc. In the councd at Ephefus the wickedncfTe
To Saliiation. Lib.4. 489
ofNcftorius was banifhed. Finally this hath bene fro the beginning
the ordmaric mesne in the Church to prelerue vnitie, fo ofte as Sa-
tan bf^gan to worke any thing. But let vs remembre , that not in all
ages or in all places arc toundc Athanafies, Ba(ilcs,Cyrilles,and fuch
defenders of true oodnne whorp the Lorde then raifcd vp. But let
vs ili'.nke what happened at Ephcfus in the fecondSynode, whgrc
the lierefie of Euticli cs prcuailcd, the man of holy memory F Jauia-
ntjs was banilhed with certaine other godly mtn,and many fuch mif-
cheues corrimitrcd reuen bccaufc Diofcorus a feditious man and of
a very naughty nature, was there the chief, and not the Spirit of the
Lordc. But there was not the Church.I giaunr. For this I determine
vtterly that the cmth doth not therefore die in the Church,although
it beopprefied of one councclhbut that the Lorde meruaiiotfly
preferueth it,that it may agasnc in due time rife vp,3nd get the oucr-
hande. But I dcnie that this ssperpetuall, that that is a tiue and cer-
taine expolition of fcripturc which hath bcn^ rcceiucd by confcntes
of a councell.
14 But the Romanifts (hootc at an other markc, when they teach
that the power to expound the Scripture bclogcth to the councells,
yea and that without appellation from them. For they abufe this
colour,to call it an cxpolition of the Scripture whatfoeucr is decreed
in the councels. Of purgatorie, ofthcintcrceffion of Saintes, of au-
ricular confeflJon,& fuch other, there can not be foundeoneiiJip.bIc
in the Scriptures. But becaufc all thefe things hauc bene ftabliflied
by the authoritie of the Church, that is to fay (to fpeake truely) rc-
ceiued in opinion and vfe,therfore euery one of them muft be taken
for an cxpofinon of Scripture. And not that onely : But it a councell
decree any thing , though Scripture eric out againft it , yet it fhall
bcare the name of an expofition thereof Chrirt commaundeth all to
dnnke of theCuppe,which he reachcthm the Supper. The councell Mat »<
of Conftance forbade,thar it fliould not be geuen to the lay people, ^^*
but willed that the prieft onely ihould drinkeofit. That which fo
diredlyfighteth agamft the inlhtution of Chrift, they will hauc to
be taken for an expofition of it. Paule calleth the forbidding of ma- «.Tim,
riagejthe hypocrifie of dcuelsrand the Holy Ghoft in an other place ^'':
pronouncethjthat mariage is mall men holy and honorable.Wherc ^ '
as they haue afterwarde forbidaen priefts ro marry , they require to
haue that taken for the true and nacurall expofition of the Scripture,
when nothing can be imagined more againft(t:If any dare ones
open his mouth to the contrary , he ihalbe iudged an bererike : bc-
caufc the determination of the Church is without appellation:and t«
Cap.i o. Of the outwardc meanes
douce of her expofition,that it is noc true,is a hainous offence. Why
{hoold I inueyc againtt To great fhamelcflhes ? For the very (hewing
of It is an oucrcomingof it. As for that which they teach of the po-
wer to allowe the Scripture,! wittingly pafTe it ouer. For in fuch fort
to make the Oracles of God fubied to the iudj^emeni of men, that
th^y Ihould therefore be of force bccaufe they haue pleafed men, is
a bbfphcmie vnworthy to be reherfed : and I haue before touched
the fame matter aheady. Yet I will af kc them one thing : If the au-
thoritie of the Scripture be founded vpon the allowance of the
Church , what councells decree will they alledgc of that matter 5" I
thinkc they haue none. Why then did Arrius fufFer himfelfe to be
ouercome at Nice with teftimonies brouglit out of the Gofpell of
lohn? For after thefe mens faying,it was free for him to haue refiifcd
thera , forafmuch as there had no allowance of a generall councell
gone bcforc.Thcy alledgc the olde rolle,which is called the Canon,
which they fay to haue procedcdfrom the iudgemet of the Church,
But I af kc them againe ,in what councell that Canon was fet forth*
Here they muft nccdes be duramc.Howbeit I defirc further to know*
what maner of canon they thinke that was. Fori feihat the fame
was not very certainly agreed among the olde writers. And if that
which Hierome fayeth ought to be of force,thcbokes of Macha-
bees, Tobie, Ecclefiafticus and foch other fhalbe thruft among the
Apocrypha : which ihofe canons do in no wife fuflfer to be done.
The X. Chapter,
of tht power in making of lavves: vvherm the Tope and hie haue v fed
a moji cruell tyranny and butcher le vpon foules,
NOwe followeth the fecond part, which they will haue to
confiftin making of bwesjout of which fpring haue flowed
innumerable traditions of men , eucn fo many fnares to
ftragle poorc foules.For they haue had no more cofcience,
^at.23 than had the Scribes and PharifecSjto lay burdens vpon other mens
• (houldcrs , which they themfelucs would not touch with one finger.
I haue in an other place taught howe cruell a butchene is that which
they commaunde concerning auricular confeffion. In other lawes
there appeatethnot fo great violence: but thofc which feeme the
moft tolerable of alljdotyrannoufl^oppreffe confcicnccs. I leauc
vnfpoken howe they corrupt the worfhip of God.and do fpoile God
himfelfe of his right , which is theonely lawmaker. This power is
nowe tb be entreated of,whether the Church may bmde cofciences
with her lawes. In which difcourfc y order of policy is noc touched,
but
ToSaluation, Lib4, 4po
but this only is intcndedjthat God be rightly worfhippcd according
to the rule which himfclfc hath prcrcnbcd,and that the fpiriiu.ill
liberty,which hath regards vnto God,may remainc fafe vnto vs. Vfc
hath made that all thole decrees be c.illcd tradiuons of men , what-
focuerihey be that haue concerning the worlhipof God proceded
from men bcd'de his word. Againft thefe do we ftriue , not againlt
theliolyand proHrablc ordmances of the Church which make for
the prcferuation either ordifciplmeor honcftie or peace. But the
ende ot our ftnuing is,that: the immeafurable and barbarous Empire
may be rclhained , which they vfurpc vppon foules , that would be
comptcd paftors of the Church,but m very dede arc moft cruel but-
chers- For they fay that the lawes which they make arc fpiritUsilljand
pcrccining to thcfoulc,and they affirmc them to be neceflaric to
cternall hfe. Hut fo (as 1 euen nowc torched) the kingdome of Chnft
is inuadedjfo the libertie by himgeuento the confcicnces of the'
faithful! IS vtterly opprefled andthrowcn abrode. I fpeakc notnowe
with howc great vngodlJneflTe they ftablifh the obieruing of their
lawes, while out of itthcy teachemento fekeboih forgeueneffvr of
linncs,and rightcoufnefre,and (aluaiio, while they fet init the whole
fumme of rehgion and godly nclTe. This one thing I earnellly holde,
that there ought no neccffi(ie to be layed vpon confciences in thofe
things wherin they are made free by Chrirt,& vnlefle they be made
free J as we haue before taught , they can not rcQ with God. They
muft acknowledge one onely king Chrift their deliuercr, and be go-
uerned by one lawc of libcrtie,cuen the holy word of the Gofpell, if
they will kepe ftill y grace which they haue ones obteined in Chnft:
they muft be holden with no bondage,and boundc wUh no bondcs.
1 Thefe Solons do in deedc faine that their conftitutions arc
lawes of libertie, a iwctc yoke , a light burden : but who can not fe
that they be mere lies? They themfelucs in deedc do felc no heaui-
nci\c of their owne lawes, which carting away the feare of God, do
carelcfly and ftoutly ncgled both their owne and Gods lawes. But
they that are touched with any care of their faluation,are farrc from
thinking themfclues free fo long as they be entangled with thefe
fnares.Wc fe with how great warcnefle Paul did deale in this behalfe, >.Cor.
that hedurfte not fomuch as in ar\y one thing lav vpon men any 7'*5«
fnare at all.and that not without caufe.Truly he forefawe with howc
great a wounde confciences (hould be ftrikcn, if they (hould be
charged with a neceffitie of thofe things whereof the Loi de had left
them liberty. On the other fide the coititutions are almoft innumc-
rablc^which thefe men haue moft greuouHy ftabliflied with threatC'*-
Cap. I o. Of the ounvard mcanes
ninge of ecernall death, which they moft fcuercly require asncccP*
farie to faluation. And among thofe there are many moft hard to be
kept, but all of them (if the whole multitude of them be laycd toge-
ther) arc impofljjblecfo great is the heape.Howc then Ihall it be pof-
fiblcjthat they vpo whom fo great a weight of diflicuitje lieth,fliould
not be rexed in perplexitie with extreme anguifli & tcrror?Therforc
my purpofe is here to impugne fuch c6ftitutions,as tend to this ende^
inwardly to binde foules before God, and charge them with areU->
gion,as though they taught them of things ncceflary to faluation,
:; This queftion doth thcrfore encomber the moft pa; t of men,
becaufe they do not futtclly enough put difference betwecnethc
outward court (as they call it) and the court of cofcience.Moteouer
Rom. this encrcafeth the difliculne, that Paul teachcth that the Magiftrat
I J.I. ought to be obey ed,noi oncly for fcarc of puniftimenr,but for con-
fciences fake.Wherupon folIoweth,that confcienccs are al(o boundc
with the polinke lawes. But if it were fo, then all ftiould fall that wc
hauc fpokcn in the laft chap, and entcnde nowe to fpeake cocerning
the fpirituall gouernment.For the loolmg of this knot,fiift it is good
to leatne what is confciencc. The definition is to be gathered of the
proper deriuation of the word.For,as when men do with mindc and
vnderftadingcocei^^the knowledge of things,they are thereby faid
fcire,to knowcwherupon is deriucd the name of fcicncc knowledge:
fo when they haue a fcling of Gods iudgemet as a wirnclfe adioincd
with them, whic i doth not fufFcr them to hide their finncs, but that
they be brought iccufcd to the iudgement feate of God , that fame
feling is'callcd cofcience. For it is a certainc meane betwenc God &
man . becaufe it (uffretb not man to fuprelTe that which he knoweth,
"^ but purfueth him fo farre till it biing him to gilnnclTe. This is it that
Rom.s. p^yje meaneth when he teacheth that confciencc doth together
* ^* witneffe with men,when their thoughtes do accufe or acquuc them
in the iudgemet of God. A fimple knowledge might rcmaine in man
as cndofed.Therfore this feling which prefenteth man to the iudge-
ment of God,is as it were a keper loined to man,to marke and watch
all his fecretes , that nothing ftiould rcmaine buried indatkcnelTe.
Whcrupon alfo cometh thatolde proucrbe,confcicncc isa thouland
t Pet. 3, witnefles. For the fame reafor^ alio Peter hath fet the examination
*'• of a good confciencc, for quietnclTe of fininde , when we being per-
fuaded of the eracc of Chritt , do without fearc prefcnt our felues
Heb.xo to God. And the author of the Epiftle to the Hcbrues , vfcth thefc
*• wordes, to haue no more confciencc of finne, in ftecde of,to be de-
liuered or acquited>thac{inne may no more accufe vs. *
4 There*
To Saliiation. Lib.4. 491
4 Therefore as workcshaue rcfpccS to men/o the confcicnccjs
referred to God ; fo that confcicncc is nothing th but the invv.irdc
purcneflc of the hart.In which fenfc Paul writeth that Chaniic is the i.Tinv
fulfilling of the lawe, out of a pure confciencc , and faith not faincd. ' • $•
Aftcrwarde alfo in the fame chap.helhewcth.howe much it differeth
from vndcrftandmg, faying that fome had fuffcred fliipwracke from
the faith , bccaufc they had forfaken good confcience. For in thefc
words he (ignificth,that it is a liucly atfcdion to worfhip God, and a
lincere defire to hue Godlily and holily. Sometime in deede it is re-
ferred alfo to men,as in Luke,when the fame Paulc teftifieth,that he A(S.a4.
cndcuorcdhimfclfthat he might walke with a good cofciccc toward * *
God and men.But this was therforc fayed, bccaufe the frutes of good
coniciece do floweftind come euen to men.But m fpeaking properly,
it hath rcfped to God only,as I haue already faid. Herupon cometh
that a lawe is fud to binde confcicncc, which fimply bindeth a man,
without regards of mcn,or not hauing any cofideration of them. As
for example. God comaundeth not only to kepe the minde chaft and
pure fro all lult,but alfo forbiddeth all maner of filthineflc of words
and ourward wantonnefl'e whatfocucr it be.To y keping of this lawe
my confciccc is lubie6:,alchough there liucd not one man in y world.
So he that behaueth himfelfe intern perantly, doth nor onely (inne in
this that he geueth euill example to his brethren,but he hath his co-
fcience bounde with giltincfle before God. In things y are of them-
felucs meane,there is an other cofideratio. For we ought to abfteinc
from thcjif tney brede any offenfe,but ihc confcience ftiU being free.
So Paul fpeaketh of lielhc cofecratc to idolcs.If any (faith he) make x Cor.
(doutjtouch itnotjfor cofcicnces fake.lfay for confcience, not thine *®'*'*
own,but y others. A faithful ma Ihould finne,which being firft warned
(hould neuerthcles eate of fuch flelh. But howfoeuer in refpcd of his
brothcr,it be ncceflary for him to abfteine,as it is prefcribed of God,
yet he cefleth not to kcpe ftill y liberty of cofcience. We fee how this
lawe binding the outward worke,leaueth the confciencc vnboundc,
5^ Nowelet vsreturnetothcbwesof men. If they be made to
this ende , to charge vs with a rehgion , as though the obferuing of
them were of it felfe necelTarie , then we fay that that is layed vpon
confcience which was not lawe full to be layed vpon it. For our con-
fciences haue not to do with men , but with God onely : whereunto
perteineth that common difference betwenc the eatthly court and
the court of c6fcience.When the whole world was wrapped in a moft
thickc mift of ignorancc,yct this fmai fparcle of light rcmained>tha!:
(hey acknowledged a mans cofcience to be aboue all iudgeincots of
Cap.io. Of the outwarde mcancs
men. Howbeit the fame thing that they did with one word confcifc,
they did afcerwarde m deede ouenhrowc : yet it was Gods will that
there ihould ihe alio remaine fome reitimcnie ot Chnftianhbcrne,
which might deUuer confciences from the tyranny of men.But that
difficulty is not yet diifoluedjwhich arifeth out of the words of Paul.
For if we muft obey Princes notonely for penalties fake, but alfo for
confciencejK fetmeth thereupon to f ollowe that Princes lawes hauc
alfo dominion ouer confcience. If tins be true , then the lame alfo
ought to be laid of the lawes of the Church. 1 anfwere that firl} here
we mu(t put a diflfcrtnce bctwcene the ^^eneraltie and the fpecialtic.
For though all rpcciall lawes do not touch the confcience, yet wc arc
bounds by the generall comaundemcnt of God,whichcommedeth
vnto vs the authontie of mjgiltrats. And vpon tiits point ftadeih the
dilputation of Paule,thatinagiihai$ arc to be honored becaufc they
are ordcined o!" God. In the meanc time he teacheth not that thofe
lawes that are prefci ibed by them^do belong to the inward gouerne-
mentof the fouleavhcreas he ec'ne where cxtolleth both the wor-
shipping of God 6f rhefpiritualhuleofl{uingrighteou{iy,aboue all
the ordinances of mtii whatfoeuer they be. An other thing alfo i$
worthy to be noted,(which yet h^geth v pon y forrner)that the lawci
of men , whether they be made by the magiltrat or by the Church,
■although they be necelfane to be kepte , (I fptake ot the good and
righteous lawes) yet thcrfore do not by thea»iclues binde cofciencc,
becatife the whole necclTuy of kepmgthem is referred to the gene-
rail ende,but confifteth not in the tbmgs comaundcd. From this fort
do farrc diflfer both thofe that prefcribe a newe forme of y worflup-
ping of God,& thofe that appoint net eflitie in things y be at liberty.
6 But fuch are thofe that at this day be called Ecclcfiafticall con-
ftitutios in the Papacie,which are thruft in, in ftcede of the true and
necefTarie worfhjpping of God And as they be innumcrable:ro arc
there infinite bondcs to catch and fnare foulcs. But although in the
declaration of the lawe we haue fomewhat touched them:yet becaufc
this place was fitter to entreate fully of them , I willnovve trauade to
gather together the whole fumme in the bcft order that I can. And
becaufc we haue already difcourfed fo much as fccmed tobcfuf-
ficient, cocerning the tyranny which the falfe biihops do take vpoa
themfeluesjin liberty to teach whatfoeuer they lift,! will nowc omitt
all that parte ; and I will here tarry onely vpon declaring the power,
which they fay they haue, to make lawes. Our falfe biQiops therforc
do burden cofciences with newe lawcs,vnder this pretenfe,that they
srexdrdeined of the Lordc fpincuali lawmakers, fins the gouerncmet
of
To Saluation. Lib.4. 492
of the Church is committed vnto them.Thercforc thcyaffirme that
whatfoeucrthey commaundc and prefcribejOughtncccflTarily to be
obferued of the Chiiftian peoplc:& that he that brcakcth it,is giltic
of double difobediccejfor that he is rebellious both to God & to the
Church. Ceruinly, if they were true bifliops. I would in this behalfe
graunt to them fomc authoritie, not fo much as they require, but Co
much as is rcquifite to y well ordering of the policy of the Church.
Nowe fith they are nothing lefle than that which they would be ac-
compted , they can not take any thing to them , be it neuer fo little,
but that they (hall take to much.But bccaufc this hath ben els where
cofidcredjet vs graunt them at this prefent, that whatfocuer power
true bifliops hauCjthc fame rightly belogeth to them alforyet 1 deny
that they be therefore appointed lawmakers ouer the faitbfuU , that
may of themfclues prcfcribe a rule to hue by, or compcll lo their
ordinaces the people c6mi:ted<vnto them. When I fay this, I meane,
that it is not lawfull for the, to dehuer to the Church to be obferued
of necelTity,that which they hauc deajfed of themfelues withoui: the
worde of God. Forafmucb as that authoritie both was vnknowen to
the ApolHes, and fo oft take away from the minifter* of the Church
by the Lords owne mouth; I maruell who hauc bene fo bolde to take
it vponthem,andat this day are fo bolde to dcfende it,be(idethc
example of the Apoftles,& againft the manifcft prohibition of God.
7 As touching that y perteined to the perfed rule of well liuing,
the Lorde hath fo coteined all that in his lawe,that he hath left no-
thing for men that they might adde to that fumme. And this he did
firft for this purpofe , that becaufe the whole vprightnefTe of liuing
ftandcth in this point,if all works be gouerncd by his will as by a rule,
he fhould be holdcn of vs y only maifter and dire<9:er of life:then, tq
declare that he rcquircth of vs nothing more than obedicce.For this
reafon lames faith:he y iudgeth his brother iudgeth the law:he that Iam.4,
iudgeth the Iawe,is not an obferuer of the laWjbut a iudge.But there «*•
is one only Uwmaker,that can both faue & deftroy.We heare y God
doth cJaime this one thing as proper to himfelfe, to rule vs with the
gouernmentandlawesof his worde. And the fame thing was fpokcn
before of Efay. although fomwhar more darkly:the Lord is our king, Efa.33
the Lord is our lawmakcrjV Lord is our iudge, he (hall faue vs.Truly iu
in both thefc places is flawed ,y he that hath power ouer the foulc,
hath y iudgcmet of life & dcath.Yea lames pronounceth this plainly.
Nowe, no man can take that vpon him. Therefore God muft be ac»
knowledged to be the only king of foulcs, to whom alone bclongeth
^ power tp faue aiuldcftroy, as thofc words of Efaie cKpredf, &10
Cap.io, Of the outwarde mcancs
►Pei.5. be the king,and iu<lge, and lawmaker and Sauior. Therefore Peter,
*• when he admoniiheth the Paftors of their dutie,exhortcih them Co
tofecde theflocke,not as vling a LortHhip oucr the Clergy ,by which
wordClergie he fignifieth the inheritance of God,that is to fay the
faithful] people.This if we rightly wey,th.it it is not bwfull,that that
ihouid be transferred to man , which God makcth his owne onely:
we fhall vnderftande that fo all the pow:;r is cut of what(oeuer it be
that they chalenge, which aduaunce ihemfelucs to commaunde any
thing m the Church without the word of God.
8 Nowe,forafinuch as the whole cauie hangeth thcreuponjthat
if God be the onely lavvemaket ,it is not laweful! for men to take that
honor to themfdues; it is mete alfo theicwithall tokepe in mindc
thofc two reafons which we haue fpol'.en,why the Lord claimcih that
to himfelfe alone. I he firft is,that his wjU may be to vs a pcrfedrulc
^ of all righteoufnefifc and hoiinclTeMad that io m the knowing of him
may be the perfed knowletige jojiue w. ll.Tbc other is, that (when
the maner is fought hovvc to worihip him rightly and well) he onely
may haue authoncieouer our foules ,whom we ought to obey , and
vpon whocs bccke we oUi^ht to hang. Theie two reafons being well
markedjit fhnlbe ealy to ludge, whatordmanccs of men are co'rary
to the word of God. Of that fort bealhhofc which are fained to be-
long to the true worihipping of God , and to the obferuing whereof
confcieces are bounde,as though they were neccflary to be obferued.
Let vs therefore remember chat all lawes of men ought to be weyed
with this balance,if we will haue a fure trial! that may neuer fuffer v$
:olo(r. to crre.The firit of thefc reafons Paul in the Epiftle to the CololTias
' ' vfeth in contendmg againft the falfe Apoftles that attempted to op-
preil'e the Churches with ncwe burdens. The fecond reafon he more
vfeth with the Galatians in the like cafe.This therefore he trauaileth
to proue in the Eoiftlc to the ColofifiaSjthat the dodrinc cocerning
the true worfliippingofGodisnottobc fought at mens handcs:be-
caufe the Lord h^th faithfully and fully infti adcd vs howe he ought
to be worfhipped. To proue the fame in y firft chap, he faith that in
the Gofpell is conteincd all wifdomeiwhercby y man of God may be
made perfed in Chrift.Io y beginning of the ij.chap.he faith,that all
the trealures ofwifdomc & vnderftadingare hidde inChrift.Thcre-
vpon he afterward concludeth,let y faithfulU)ewarc that they be not
by vain Philofophie Jed from the flocke of Chrift , according to the
conftitutios <»f men. But in the endeof the chaptcr,he doth yet with
greater boldneffc candemne ail Eihelothrefkias,y is to fay^all fained
worfhippings, which men dcuifc to themfclucs,or rccciuc of othcr,ac
what-
To Valuation. Lib.4. 45^3
whatfocucr precepts they dare of themfelues giue conccrnmgc ihc
worlliippin.;c of God.We haue therefore, that all thofe o: dmanccs
are wickcd,in obieruinge whcrtof the worfhippingc of God is fdjncd
to be. As for the places in the Galatias wherewith he earneftly affir-
meth that confcicnces, which ought to be ruled of God only, ought
not to be entangled with fnares, they are open enough, fpccially in
the fift Chapter . Therefore Ictte it be fufficicntto haue but noted
them.
. 9 But bceaufe the whole matter fhall better be m.ide open by ex-
amples, before that we go any furrhcr, it is good aliotoappl\ this
dodrine to our own times.We fay that y colbtuiions which they cjU
tcclclialhc3ll,wherwith the Pope and his do burden the Churcr!,arc
pernicious and wicked: our aducriaries defende that they be holy &
auailabic to faluation. There be two kindes of the;for fome conccrnc
Ceremonies & rites,other lome pcrtainc more to difcipline.Is there
then a luft caufe to moue Vk to impugne them both ? Tiuely a lufter
than wc woulde. Firft do not the authors themfclucs clearely dchne,
that the very worfhipping of God i* cotained in them ?To what pur-
pofe do thcv apply tljcir Ceremonies , but that God fliould be wor-
fhipped by .hem ? And that comnieth to paife not by the oncly er-
rour of the ignorant muituudc, but by their allowance that haue the
place of teachinge. I do not touch the grol]eabhominations,whcic»-
with they haue gone about to ouerthrow all godlines. But it Ihouldc
pot be imagined amonge them to be To hainous an ofF^nfc, to haiic
failed in any of the Icaft pety traditions , vnlefl'e they did make the
woriliippingof Godfubicdtotheir famed deuifes.Whatdo we the
offend,if at this day we can not beare that, which Paule taught to be
intolerable,that the lawfuU order of the worlhipping of God fhould
i)e reduced to the will of men:fpecially when they commaund men to
worihip according to the elemcntes of this world.which Paule terti-
ficth to be againft Chrifl r Againe it is not vnknowen, vvith how pre- ^^^^•'^
-cife neccflity they binde conkiences to kepc whatfoeuer they com- Gal c t
inaund. Here when we cry out to the contrary ,we haue all one caufe
\*ith Paul,which in no wife fuffreth faithful confciences to be brought
into bondage of men.
10 Moreoucrthisworftofallis added, that when religion hath
oncQ begon to be defined with fuch vaine inuentions.ihcre eucr fo-
loweth after that peruerfencfTe another abhominable frowardneflc,
*vhereof Chrift reproched the Pharifees that the commaundcment
pf God is made voidc for the traditions of men . I will not vfc mine
jOwae wordes in Bghtingc againft our lawemakets at ihefe daiet. Ltc
Cap.i o. Of the outward mcanes
ifacm haue the vidory , if they can by any meane purge thcmfclucf
from this accofation of Chrift.But how fhould they excufe the, when
amonge them it is thought infinitly more haynous,to haue omitted
auricular cofcflion when the time of yere comech about,than to haue
continued a moft wicked life a whole yere together.* to haucinfeded
their tonge with a Ude lafting of flefh on a Friday , than to haue de-
filed their body with whoredom ai the daics of the weke?to haue put
their handc to an honeft worke vpon a day confecratc ro I wote not
what pety Saintes,than to haue continually exercifcd their members
in moft wicked offenfes ? for a Prieft to be coupled with one lawefuU
fnariagCjtha to be entangled with a thoufand adulteriesPnot to haue
performed a vowed pilgrcmage,than to breake faith in al promifes?
not to haue wafted fomwhat vp6 monftruous & no lefle fuperfluoui
& vnpiofitable exceffiue gorgioufnes of tcples,than to haue failed to
help the extreme necelTities of the poorc ? to haue palled by an idolc
without honor,than to haue defpitefully entreated all kmdes of men?
not to haue mubled vp at certame houres a great number of wordes
without vnderftanding,than neuer to haue conceiued a true praier in
their bartHVha t is to make voide the comaundement of God for the
traditios of menjif this be not:whcn comending the keping of Gods
c6maundemcts but coldly & as it wci c lightly by the way, they do no
lefle earneftly & bufily exad the obeying of their ownc, than if they
contained in the the whole pith of godhnes?whcn reuengingy tranf.
grefTing of Gods law,with hght pcnahies of fatisfadionSjthcy punifli
y very leaft offence of one of their owne decrees with no leffe paine
than with prifonmenrjbanifhmenf,ficr or fwerdrBcinge not fo iharp
& hard to entreate againft the defpifers of God , they perfccutc the
defpifers of themfelues with vn.ippeafeable hatred to the extrcr
niitytand do fo inftrud all thofe,whofe fimplicity they hold captiue,
that they would with more contented minde lee y whole law of God
ouerthrowettjthan one fmal title (as ihcy cal it) in the commaunde-
mcnts of the Church to be broken. Fiift m this point is grieuous of-
fence committed, that for fmall malteis,3nd fuch as(if itflioulde be
tried by Gods iudgemenr)arc at liberty,one man defpifethjiudgeth Sl
cafteth away an other.But now,as though that were not euji enough,
ihofc triflinge elementes of the world (as Paule calleth them in his
Q wryting to the Galatians)arc weyed of more value than the heauely
Oracles of God. And he that is in a manner acquired in adiiltery,is
iudgedinmeate : he that hath leaue to vfe a harlot, is forbidden to
haue a wife.This profite verily is gotten by that tranfgrefiinge obe«f
dicncc> which is fo much turned frpm God as ii declineth to men.
To Saluation. Lib.4. 494
1 1 There be allb other two not fcledcr faultcs,vvhich wc dil.ilow
in the fame ordinaces. Firll,bccaufc they prefcribc for the moft pare
vnprofitablc, & fomtime alfo fond obleruationsnhcnjbecaulc godly
confcicnces are opprelFcd with the infinite multitude of thcm,& be-
ing rouled b.icke into a certain Iewiihnes,thcy fo cleaue to fhadowcSj
that they can not attaine to ChrilhWheras I cal them fond & vnpro-
fitablcjl know that that will not feeme credible Co the wjldom of the
flclli.which fo wtl hketh thcm,thatit thmketh the Church to be vt-
tcily deformed when they be taken away.But this is it that Paul wri-
tethof.tohauearefemblanceof wifdomin counterfait worlhipping, Colo.*,
in humihry,& in this that they thinke that with their Iharpencs they *^
be able to tame their flclh. This is truely a moft wholcfome admoni-
tion,fuch as ought neuer to flip away from vs.Mens tradition,x(fayth
hc)do docciue vnder the l"hewe of wifdom,whenfe haue they this co-
lour ? becaule they are fained of men, therefore the wir of man doth
therm acknow his ownc,& acknowinge it doth more gladly embrace
itjtha any thmg were it neuer fo t.ood, that Icfle agreed with his va-
nity. Againe,ihey haue hereby an other c6mendation,becaufe they
Iceme to be fit introdudions to huinihty,for that with their yoke they
hold the mindes of menprelkd downe to the ground. Laft of all, be-
caule they feeme to tend to this end to reftraine the deintines of the
flelK& to fubdue it with rigor of abftinece,therfore they are thought
to be wifely deuifcd. But what faith Paul to thefe things?doth he not
fliakc of thofe vifors , leaft the (imple fhoulde be dcceiued with falfe
pretenferBecauIe he iudged this enough for cofutation of them, that
be had layd that they were the inuentions of men, he pafTeth oucr alt
the(e thlHiis without confutation,as though he cftcmed them for no-
thing.Yca,becaufe he knew y all fained worlhippinges in the Church
were condcmncd,and are fo much more fufpicious to the faithful as
they more dclitethe wit of man:becaufe he knew that that famed i-
inage of outward humility doth fo much differ from true humility, as
it might cafily be difcernedrfinally bccaufe he knew that that chiidifh
introdutlion was no more eftemed tha an exercifc of the body: rhcr-
forc he willed that the very fame things fhould be to the faithfull in
ftccdc of a confutation of mens traditions , by fauour of which chey
were commended among the ignorant.
12 So at this day not only the vnlcarned commo people,but eucry
ma as he is moft puffed vp with worldly wifdom,fo is he moft marue-
loufly dclited with beholding of Ceremonies. But hypocrites & foo-
l.ifti women thinke that there can be nothinge deuifed more glorious
^or better.Buc they which do more depciy fearche^aad more truely
Cap. 10, Of the outward meanes
wcie according to the vule of godlmeflc, of what value (o many and
fuch Ceremonies arcjdo vndcrftand.firrt that they are trifle$,bccaufe
they haue no profitc : then , that they are dccciics, becaufe they do
with vainc pompc beguile theeies of the beholders.I fpeakc of thofc
CeremonieSjVnder which y Ronufh maifters vvil that there be greac
ini{leries;but we find them by experience to be nothing els but mere
mockeries. And it IS no maruel that the authors of them haucfaliei^
(b far a'» to mocke both themfelucs & other with trifling folhcs : be-
caufe they partely tooke their examplarout of the dotages of the
Gentils,& partly after the maner of apes did vndifcretly counterfaitc
the olde vfages of the lawe of Mofcs, which no tnore pertained to V8
than the Sacrifices of bcaftes & fuch other thingcs. Truely although
there were none other argument, yet no man that hath his found wic
wiUookcfor any goodnes of aheapc fo il patched together. And the
ihinge it felfc plamly fhewerh, that many Ceremonies hauc no other
vfe but to amafc the people rather tha to teach them.So in thcfc new
found Canons,that do rather perutrt tha preferue difcipline,thc hy-
pocrites repofe great importance : but ifa man do better looke into
them,he ftial finde that they are nothinge clfc but a Hiadowirti & va-
nifhing flicw of difciplme.
1 1 But nowc (to come to the other point)who doth not fee that
traditions with heapinge one vpon an other, arc oucrgrowen into fo
great a numbcr,ihat the Chriftian Church may in no wife beare the?
Hereby it is come to pafre,that in Ceremonies there appereth I wotc
not what lewifhncfle , & the other obfcruatios bring a gricuous but-
Ai Ian. chery to Chriftian foules.Augoftmc complained that in his timc,the
f pifto. commaundementes of God negleded,all things were ful of fo many
**'• prefumptionsjthat he was more grieuoufly rebuked y in his vtas had
touched the ground with bare foote, than he that had buried his wit
with dronkcnnes.Hc complained that the Church,which the mercy
of God willed to be fi:cc,was fo burdened,thattheftate of the lewcs
was much more tolerable . If that holy man had happened to liuc in
our age,with what complaintes would he haue bewailed the bondage
that nowc is?For both the number is ten times greaterjand euery fmal
title is a hundred times more rigoroufly looked vnto,tha at that time;
So is wont to be donerwhen thefe perucrfe lawemakers haue gotten
the dominion,thcy make no end of bidding and forbiddinge,till they
come to extreme peuilhncffe. Which thing Paule hath aifo very wel
declared in thefe wordes:If ye be deade to the world,why arc ye hol-
Colo. 2. den as though ye were liuin^c , with traditions , as eate not, tafl nor,
•^ handle not /For where as the Creeke word aptefthai^figniHcth both
to
To Saliiation. Lib.4. 495
CO eatc and to touchc, doudeffc in this place it is taken in the firft of
thcfe two (ignifications ,leaft there {houldc be a fupcrfluous repeti-
tion. Therefore he doth here excellenily well delcribe the procec-
dinges of the falfe Apoftlcs . They beginncat fupeiltition , fo that
ihcy do not onely forbid to eatc, bu c s'.fo euen fclcnderiy to chawc:
when they haue obteined this,thcy the alfo forbid lo taft.When this
is alio grauntcd them,thcy rcckcn it not lawfull fo much as to touch
with a finger.
14 This tyranny in the ordinance? of men wc do at this day wor-
thily blame, by which it is come to paflc that poore confcicnces arc
marueloufly tormented with innumerable decrees and immeafurablc
cxadingofkcepingeof them. Of canons pertaining to difciplinc wc
haue fjjoken in an other place. Of the Ceremonies what lliall I fayjbjr
which it is biought about that,Chrift bein^e halfe buricd,wc arc re-
turned ro Icwiihc figures ? Our Lorde Chrift (faytb Auguftinc)hath EpHt»,
bound together the fclowfliip of the new people , with Sacramentes " 8. ad
very fevve in number,moft cxcclJcnt in fignification,moft eafie in ob- **^***«
fcruing.How farre the multitude and diucrfity of vfages wherwith at
this day we fee the Church to be entangled,doih differ from this Sim-
plicity , it can not be fufficiently declared . I know with what crafty
Oiifte fome futtle men do excufc this pcruerrcnciTc. They fay that a-
inong vs there are many as rude as they were in the people of Ifraeb
that fuch introdudion was ordained for their fakes , which although
the ftronger may well want > yet they ought not to ncgled it , foraf-
much as they fee it to be profitable for the weake brethren . I aun-
fwere,that we arc not ignoranc,what we owe to the weakencs of our
brethren : but on the other lide we take exception and fay, that this
is not the way whereby tne weake may be prouidcd for,y they Should
be ouerwhelmed with great heapes of Ceremonies. The Lorde did
not in vaine put this difference bctwene vs and the old people , that
his will was to inftiudthem like children with figncs and figurcs,but
vs more (imply without fuch ouiwarde furniture. As(fayeth Paule)a 0*1.4,*
childe IS ruled of his fchoolemaifter, and kept vnder cuitody , accor-
ding to the capacity of his age : fo the lewcs arc kept vnder the lawc.
But wc arc like vnto full growen men.which being fet at liberty from
tutorship and goucrnment, haue no more neede of childifli introdu-
dions . Truely the Lorde did forefce what maner of common peo*
pic there fhoulde be in his Church, andhowc they ihoulde be ruled.
Yet he did in this maner as we haue faid, make difference betwenc vs
& the Icwes.Tbercfore it is a foolifli wayjif wc will prouidc for the i-
gnorantj in raifingc vp Icwillines which is abrogate by Chrift;Chrift
Cap.io. Ofthc outward mcancs
alfo touched in hisovvne words this difference of the oldc and new
people , when he fayd to the woman of Samaria , that the time wa»
come wherein the true worfhippers fhoulde worfhip God in Spiritc
and tructh.This venly had alway bin done:but the new worfhippers
differed iroai the olde in this pojnt , ihat vnder Mofes the fpirituall
worshipping ol God was fliadowcd & in a maner entangled with ma-
ny Ceremonies, which being abohflicd,he is now rnore iimply wor-
(hipped. rherfore they that confoiiiid this diff2rence,do ouerthrow
the order inftitiitc & ftablillied by ChnliSnall there then(wilt thou
fay)no Ceremonies be giuen to the ruder iort to hclpe their vnskil-
fulnesM fay not focfor 1 verily thinkc that this kinde of help is profi-
table for them. 1 do here trauaile onely that fuch a meane may be v-
fcd,3S may brightly fct outChrift,& not darken him.Therfore there
arc giuen vs of God few Ccremoniesj & thofe not bbourfome, chat
ihcy (hould ihewe Chrift beingc prefent.Thc Icwei had moe i^iucn
thenijthat they fliould be images of him beinge ab.'em. Ablent I fay
he W3S,not in powcr,but in maner of fignifying. Thereforc,y meanc
/ may be kcpt,it is neceffary to kcpe that fewnelle in number , eafinef
in obferuing,& dignity in (ignifying, which alfo con (i lie th in clc.ire'
ncs.What ncdc I to fay that this hath not bin done?For the thing it
felfc isin all mens eies.
15 Here I omit with howe pernicious opinions mens mindes arc
fillcdjin thinking that they be facrifices wherewith oblation is rightly
made toGodjWhereby finnes are cleanfedj whereby righteoufnes &
faluationis obtained. They wiJ deny that good things are corrupted
with fuchforeinerrours: forafmuch as in this behalfe a man may no
Icffe offend in the very workcs alfo comaunded of God. But this hath
more hainoufneSjthat fo much honor is giuen to works raHily fained
by the wil of ma,that tliey are thougiit to be thmLiS deferuing eternal
hfe.For the works comaunded of God haue reward cherforc,becaufc
the lawmaker himfclfcin refpcd of obedience accepteth them.Ther-
fore they rcceiue not their value of their ownc worthines,or of their
own deferuinge.but becaufe God fo much eftecmcth our obedience
toward him. J fpcake here of that perfedion of workes which is co-
maunded of God,& is not performed of men.For therefore the very
vvorkes of y law which we do,haue no thanke but of the free goodnes
of God,bccaufc in them our obedience is weakc & lame.But becaufe
we do not here difputCjOf what value works are without Chrift,ther-
fore let vs pafic oucr that queftioal come backe againe to that which
Hicr. 7. properly beJongeth to this prefent argument, that whatfoeuer com-
**• niendacion workes haue in thcm,they hauc it in rcfpci^ of the obedi'
cnce
To Saluation. Lib.4. 49 6
cncc, which oncly the Lord doth lookc rpon, as he t€f!ifi«<h by the E^a. yj.
Prophet:! gauc not commaundcmencoflacrifices& burnt ofFrings, * **>
but only that ye (hould with hearing,hcarc my voycc.But of fayned * '*
workes he fpcakcth in an other placc,faying:Ye weie your filuer and
not in bread, AgainCjthcy worfhipmein vaine withy precepts of mc. |^j,^ij
This therfore they can by no wayes,excure,that they fuffer the iilly ^
people to feke in thofe outward trifles the rightcoufnes whcrby they
may ftand againft God,& vphold thelelucs before y heauenly iudgc-
ment feate.Moroucr, is not this a fault worthy to be inueied againlt,
that they Ihew forth Ceremonies not vnderftaded as it were a ftagc
play,or a magical encbauntnnntPForitis ccrtainey all Ceremonies
are corrupt & hurtful,vnli (Te men be by them direded to Chrift.Buc
the Ceremonies that are vfed vndcr the papacy, are feuered fro do-
^rine, that they may the more hold men in Iignes without all (ignifi-
cation.Finally(ruch a cunning craftfman is the belly)it appcareth th^
many of the haue bin inuented by couetous facrificing pi ieltes,to be
fnares to catche money.But what beginninge foeuer they haue,thcy
are all fo giuen forth in common for filthy gainc^that we muft ncedes
cut of a great part of them, if we wil bring to pafle that there be not a
prophane market,and ful of facrilege vfed in the Church,
16 Although 1 feemc not to teach a continual dodrine cocerning
the ordinances of men, becaufe this (pcakingc is altogether apphed
to our own time:yet there is nothing (poke that (hal not be profitable
for all times. For fo oft as this fuperftition crcpcth in, that men will
worfhippe God with their owne famed deuifes,whatfoeuer the lawcs
be that are made to y purpofe, they do byandby degenerate to thofe
groflc abufes.For the Lord thrcatneth not this curfe to one or two a-
geSjbut to al ages of the world, that he willftrike them with bbndncs
and amafed dulnes that wor jfhip him with the dodrines of men.ThiS
blinding continually maketh that they flee fronokindeofabfurdi- Efa. xju
ty,which defpifing fo many warnings of God, do wilfully wrap them • 5.
felues in thofedeadely fnares. But if,fettinge afide circumftances,you
wil haue fimply fliewed what be the mens traditions of all 3gcs,which
it is mete to be reiedcd of the Church, and to be difalowed of all the
godIy,that fame fhalbe a fure and plainc definition which we haue a-
boue fetrthat all lawes without the word of God arc made by men to
this ende,either to prefcribe a maner of worfhipping God,or to bindc
confciences with religion,as thou::- h they gaue commaundemcnt of
thinges ncccflary to i aluation . 1 f to the one or both of thefe there
be adioyned other faultes : as, that with their multitude they darken
the brightnelTe of the Gofpdl:that they nothing edifie,but be rather
Cap.io. Of the outward mcancs
vnpiontatic and triflingc occupations than true exercifcs of godll-
ncire : that they be laid abroade to fiichincffe and vnhoneftgajncJ
that they be too hard to be kept:that they be defiled with cuil iupcr-
ftitionstthefe ihall be helpcs that we may the more eafily finde how
mucheuillisinthem.
17 I he.nc what they anfwcrc for themfelucs, that their tradirios
ire not of chemfelues, but of God . For, they fay that the Church is
goucrnedorthc holy Ghoft,tharit cannoterrerand that the autho-
rity thereof rcmaineth with them . When thisisobramed, It there-
withal! folowethjthat their traditions are the reuelarions of the ho-
ly Ghoft, which can not bcdefpifed but wickedly and wjth the con-
tempt of God. And that they llioulde not fecme to haue attempted
any thinge without great auihoi ity , they will haue it beleucd that a
great parte of their obferuations came from the Apoftlcs; and they
Aft I <;. affirme that by one example is fufficiently declared w!<at the Apoftles
3o»&29 did in other thingSjwhen being alTembled inoneCounccl!,t:-.ey did
by the decre of the Councell commaunde the Gentiles to abftainc
from thingcs offered to idols,from blood and ftrangled.We haue al-
ready in an oiher place declared, how falily for boalhtige of thcmfel'
ues they lyingely vfurpe th.e title of the Church. So muc'i as concer-
ning tliis prefcntcaure.'ifjplucking away all vifors,and dcceitfull co-
lours, we trueJy looke vpon that which we ought principally to care
for,& which chicfty is for our behoofe,that is,what mancr of Churcb
Chrift will haue,that we may fafhion and frame our felues to the rule
thirofrit fhal eafily be euidet vnto vs^hat it is not the Church,which
paltinge the boundes of the word of God, doth outrage and runne at
riotin makinecof ncwclawcs. For doth notth^tUwc which was
Pcu.ix. orice prefcribed to the Church,remaine etcrnall?Wh3t I commaund
3 J. thee,that thou fhalt kepc that thou msift do it. Thou flult not adde
Pro. so, any thing,nor take any thing fro it. And in an other placc:Adde not
^ * to the word of the Lord, nor minifli any thingdeaft he peraduenturc
rcproue thee,3nd thou be founjlc a Iyer. Sith they can not deny that
this was fpoice to the Church,which do they elfe but repprt the ftub-
borneffe of that Church,what they boaft to haue bin To bold as after
fuch prohibitions neuerthelcfle to adde & mingle of her owne with
the dodrine of God ^ But God forbid that we flioulde aflcnt ;6 their
lies, whereby they burden the Church with fo greata fclaunder : but
let vs vnderftande,that the name of the Church is fafly pretended. fo
oft as thisluft ofmens r3fhenefleisfpokenof,whichcan notholdcit
felfe within the prefcribed boudes of God, but that it wildly raneeth
& runneth out into her owne inuetions?Thei'e is nothing entangled,
nothing
nothing darkcnothm^ uoottuU in thcfc woi des,in which the whole
Church is forbiflde to adde co the word of God,or to take any thing
fromitjwhcn the worftiippinge of God,and prcceptcsconcerningc
f4lu3tion,are cntrentcd of.But this (fay they) was ipckenofthe lawc
only, after wh^ch foiowcd the prophecies & the whole miniOration
of the Gofpcl.I grauntin dede:and 1 adde alfo,which are rather ful-
iSUmgesofthelaWjchan additions or dimini{hingcs.But iftheLordc
fuffred nothing to be added to or taken from tlie miniftery of Mofes,
which was ( as I may fo tcrme it ) darkc by reafon of many doutfull
cnwrappinges, till by his fcruimtes the Prophetcs , and at length by
bis beloued Sonne , he mmiftred a clearer dodrincwhy (houldc wc
not thinkc it ifiuch more fcueicly forbidden vs, that wefhould adde
nothing to the law^thc Prophetes.the P(3lmc$,and the Gofpel^'Thc
Lorde IS not gone out ofkinde from hinifelfe,which hath longe ago
declared,that he is with nothing fo hiely offend^ d,as whe he is wor-
shipped with the inucntions of men ? Whereof came thofe notable
fayinges in the Prophets,which ought to hauc continually founded
in our cares:I fp^kc no words to your fatherSjin y day that I brought
them outof itgiptjconcerningfacrificc and burnt offringe. But diis ^^ *'*
word I commaunded them, faying:With hearinge hearc my voycc:
and I will be your God,and you flialbe.mypeople,& you fhall walke lere.ii.
in all the way that I Ihall commaunde you.Againe,l hauc with pro- i.Sa. 15
telling proteftedvnto your fathers, Heare my voyce. And other Jike »2»
fayingsrbut this is notable aboue the reft. Will God haue burnt ofe-
tinges and facrifices,and not rather that his voyce be obeiedi^For o-
bediencc is better than facnficc , and to barken is better than to offer
the fatteoframmes. For, to refift is as the finneof foothfayingeiaml
not to obey is as the wickedncffe of Idolatry. Therefore whatfoe-
uer inuen-tions of men are in this behalfe defended with the autho-
rity of the Church, forafmuchas the fame can not be excufcdfrom
the crime of vngodlinefle, it is cafie to proue that it is falfly imputed
to the Church.
1 8 After this forte wc freely inueie againl) this ryranny of mens
traditionsjwhich is proudly thruft in among vs,vnder the title of the
Church.For neither do wc fcornc the Church(a$ our aduerfaries, to
bring vs in hatred, do vniuftly lye vpon vs) but wc giue vnro her the
praife of obediecc, than which rtie knoweth no greater praife.They
rather are very fore wrong doers to the Church.which make her ob-
ilinate againft her Lorde, while they faine that (he hath proceeded
further than fhc lawfully might do by f word of God:though I fpeakc
nothing how it is a notable fhameUincirc ioyned with as great ma"
RRR»
Cap.i o. Oi the oucward meanes
EpiHo. wryiten.For,that which Auguftihc fayth,that ccrcayne Churches in
it8. ad |^J5 time did fhunne chat folemne folowingc of Chriftes eX'^imple in
^"* wafninge of fectc, leaft that vfage fhoulde feemc to pcrtaine to Bap-
tifmejiecretly (hcweth that there was then no kinde of wafhing that
had any likcnefle with Baptifme. Whatfoeuer it be, I will not graunc
that this proceeded from an Apoftolike Spiritejrhat Baptifme,whcn
it is with a daily figne brought into remembrance,fhou!d after a ccr-
taine manner be repeated . And 1 paffc not vpon this, that the felfc
fame Auguftine in an other place afcribeth other thinges alfo to the
Apoftles.For fith he hath nothing but coniedurcs,iudgement ought
not vppon them to be giuen of fo great a matter. Finally admitte that
we graunc them alfo , that thofe thinges which he rehcarfeth came
from the time of the Apoftlcs:Yet there is great difference betwenc
inlhtuting feme exerciie of Godlinefle , which the Faythfull with a
free confcicncc may vfe, orifthe vfcof itfliallnot beproHtablcfor
them,they may forbeareit: and making a law that may fnare confci-
enccs with bondage.But now,from what author foeuer they procec-
dcd,iith we fee that they arc flidde into fo great abure,nothing with-
ftandeihjbutthat we may without offence of him abolifh them : for-
afmuch as they were neuer fo commcnded,that they muft be perpe-
tually immouable.
21 Neither doth it much hcipe them,thatto cxcufe their tyranny
they pretend the example of the Apoftlcs.The Apo(Hes(fay thcy)8c
the ciders of the firft Church,madc a decree bcfide the commaunde-
mencof Chriftjwherin they commaunded all the Gentils to abftainc
from things offrcd to idols, from ttrangled,& from blood.If that was
lawful for the,why i$ it not alfo lawful for their fucceflburs, to follow
, the fame fo oft as occafio fo requircth?! would to Godjthey did both
in all other thinges and in this thing folow them. For I deny that the
Apoftles did there inftitute or decree any new thinge,which is eafie
to be proued by a ftrong reafon. For whereas Peter in that CounccU
pronounceth,ihat God is lemptedjf a yoke be Jayd vpon the neckes
of the difciples.'he doth himfclfe ouerthrow his owne fentence,if he
after warde confent to haue any yoke layd yppon them.Bot there is a
yoke layd, if the Apoftles do decree of their owne authority that the
Gentils fhould be forbidden,that they (hould not touch things offrcd
to idoisjbloodjand ftrangled. In dcde there yet remaineth a doutjfor
that they do neuerthcleffe fceme to forbid. But this douc fhall eafily
bediffoluedjifa man do more nerely confider the meaning of the de-
cree it felfe.in the order and efteft wherof the chief e point is,that to
the Gentils their liberty is to be Icfte^ and that they ought not to be
trouble d^
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 4^^
troubled,nor accombred about the obfcruations of the law.Hithcr-
to it very well maketh of our fidc.But the exception that immediatly
foloweth,ncither is any new law made by the Apoftlcs, but y diuinc
and eternal! commaundcmcnt of God , that charity ought not to be
broken,nor doth diminifh one title of that hberty:but only adrnoni-
iheth the Gentils,how they (hould temper themfclues to their bre^
thre,ihat they abufe not their liberty to the offence of them. Let this
thcrfore be the fccond point,that the Gentils fliould vfc a harmlcflc
liberty,and without offence of their brethren.Butyet ihey prefcribc
fomc certainethingc:thatis,thcy teach & appointjlo farreas vvas ex-
pedient for the time,by what thmgs they might runne into y offence
of their brethren,that they might beware of thofe thmges;but they
adde no new thmge of their owne to the eternall law of God, which
forbiddeth the oftcnding of brethren.
2z Like as if the faithful Paftors which Rouerne the Churches not
yet well reformed, fhoulde commaunde all their people, that till the
weake with whom they hue do grow ftronger,they Ihould not open-
ly eate tielli on Fiiday,or openly labour vpon holy daies,or any fuch
thinge.For although thcfc thinges,fcttingefuperliition andc,aie by
thcmfeluei indiffcrent:yct when there is added offence of brethren,
they ca not be done without a fault. But the times are fuch,that the
faythfull can not fhewc fuch a fight to the weake brethren , but that
they fliall fore wounde their confcienccs. Who, but a cauiller,will fay
that fo they make a new law,whereas, it is ccrtainc that they do on-
ly preucnt offences , which arc expreflely enough forbidden of the
LordfAnd no more ciit be fayd of the Apoftles, whofe purpofe wa$
nothing clfe, but in takinge away the matter of offences, to call vpon
the law of God conccrningc the auoydinge of offence: as if they had
fayd: It is the Lords c6maundemcnt y ye offend not a weake brother,,
Ye can not eate thinges offred to images, Itrangeled and blood, but
that the weake brethren ftialbe offended.Therefore we commaunde
you in the word of the Lord, that ye eate not with offence. And thaf
the Apoftles had rcfpcdto the famethinge, Paule himfelfe is a very
good witneffejwhich wriccth thus,verily none otherwife than accor-
ding to the meaning of the CouncelrConccrning meates that are of-
fered to IdolsjWe know that the Idolc is nothing.But fome with cons*
fcicnce of the Idolc,do eate it as offred to Idols,and their confciencCj
forafmuch as it i$ weake,i$ defiled.See that your liberty be not made
an offence to the wcake.Hc y (lull haue well weied thefe things.fhall '^•^^*'»'
not aftcrwarde bcdecciued with fuchafalfc colour as they makc»
fh^t pretend phc Apoltic^for defpncc of their tyranny,as though tk^
Cap,
10, Of the outward meancs
Apoltles had begonnc with their decree to breakc the hberty of the
Church. Buc,that they may not be able to efcapc, but be driuen cuen
with their owne confeflfion to allowe this (blution, lettc them aun-
fwere mejby what right they were (o boldii to abrogate the fame de-
crec.Becaulc there was no more pent of thofe offences & dsffentions,
which the Apoft'es meant to prouide for,& they know that the lawe
was to be wey.d by the end therof.Forafmuch as therefore this law
was made in refpe*^ cjfchariryjthere is nothinge prefcribed in it, but
fo much as pertamcth to chanty. When they confefle that the iranf-
grefiing of this law is nothing but a btcaking of charity.do they not
therwithall acknowledge, that it is not a forged addition to the lawc
of God J but a naturall and limple appliance to the times and matiers
whcreunto it was direded?
25 But although fuch lawes be a hundred times vniuft & iniurious
vnto vs, yet they affirme that they mult be h-ard without exception:
for they fay that chis is not here irrtcndcd^that we (houlde conient to
errouiSjbut only that being fubie<^tswe fhould bearc the hard com-
maundemcnts of our gouernours,which it is not our partes to refulc.
But here alfo the Loide very well refifteth them with rhc truerh of
his word,& dcliucreth vs out of iuch bondage into the libcrty,whtch
he hath purchafed for vs with his holy blood,the benefit whereof he
hath more than once confirmed with his word, tor that is not here
only intended(as they malicioufly faine)that we Ihouldc fuffer fome
gricuous opprciTion in our body,bui: that our confcicnces being fpoi-
ted of their liberty that is of the benefit of the blood of Chrift, fhold
be (crudely tormentcd.Howbcit let vs pafle oner this alio, as though
it made litle to the matter.But of how great importance do wc think
it is,that the Lordes kingdom is taken away from him,which he clai-
mcth to himfelfe with fo great fcuerity ? But it is taken away fo oft as
he is worfliipped with the lawes of mens inucntions,whercas he will
be hoiden for the only lawmaker of his owrte worlhip. And leaft any
man fnold thinke it to be a matter of nothing,lct vs heare how much
the Lord efttmcth it. Becaure(fayth he)tliis people hath feared mc
Eta. 19. with the commaundcment & dodrine of men.bcholde I wil aftonifti
*i- them with a great &wonderous miraclc.For wifdom flial perifh from
the wife men thcrof,& vnderftanding (hal depart fro the elders.In an
Matt.15 other place. They worfhip me in vainc teaching dodtrines.the com-.-
^. maundemcnrsofme.And truly whcras the children of Ifraell defiled
theft lues wich many idolatries, the caufe of aly cuil is afcribed to this
vnclean mixture,y tranfgreffing the commaundcmcnis of Ciod,they
haue forged new worihippinges. And therefore the holy Hiftory rc^
hcarfcth
lobamation. JLib.4. 500
Jicarfcth that the new ftr agers that had bin traniplantcd by the king
of Babilontoinhabite SamariajWerc torne in pceces &- cowrumed of
wildc bcallcs, bccaufc they knew not the iudgemcntes or ftatuus of
the God of that lande. Although they had nochingc offended m the
Ceremonic$,yct God would not haue allowed a vaine pomperbut in
the meane time he ccafed not to take vengeance ofthedcHlinge of
his worfhip, for that men did thrpft in dcuifes ftrangc from his word.
Wherupon it is afterward faid.that they being made afraid with that
punifhment, rcceiued the Ceremonies prefcnbed in the law: but be-
caufe they did not yet purely worfliip the true God, it is twife repea-
ted that they did feare him and did not fearc him. Wherupon we ga^
ther,that the parte ofreuerencc which is giuen to him, confilleth in
this.while in worlhipping him we (imply follow what he commaun-
deth with mingling none of our inucntions. And therefore the godly s.Kingi
kmgs are oftentimes praifed,becaufc they did according to al the c6- *5«
inaundements,& declined not to the righc hande nor to the left.I go
yet furtherralthough in fomc fayned worHiipping there do not opcly
appearc vngodlincs, yet it is feuerely condemned of the holy jg^hoft,
fo foone as men depart fro the comaundemct of God.The Altar of
AchaZjthe paterne wherot* was brought out of Samaria, might haue 2 Kings
feem«d to encreafe the garnifhment of the temple,whcreas his dcuife ***'*°-
was to offer Sacrifices thereupon to God oneIy,which he iTioulde do
more honorably than vpon the firft & old Altar: yet we fee how the
Spirit deteftech that boldneffe, for none other caufe but for that the
inucntions of me in y worlTiipping of God are vncleane corruptions.
And howe much more clcarely the will of God is opened vnto vs, fb
much the leffe excufable is our frowardncs to attept any thinge.And
therfore worthily with this circumftancc the crime of Manafles is en- , j^- ^
forced, forthathebuildedancw altar in Ierufaie,of which God had j, ,^ °
pronounced I will there fet my namc,becaufc the authority of God
is now as it were of fet purpofe refufed.
24 Manydomaruellwhy Godfofharply ihreatncthy he willdo
thmges to be vrondred at to the people of whom he was worfhipped
with the cotpmaundements of men,& pronounceth that he is wor-
fhipped invaine withy precepts of men.But if they confidered.what
k is in thccaule of religion,that is to fay of heaucnly wifdom,to hang
vpo the only mouth of God,thcy would thcrwithal fcc,V' it is no fde-
dcr reafon why God foabhorreth fuch pcrucrfe f^ruiccs,that arc done
to him accordinge to the luft of mans wii.For although they that o-
be.y fuch lawes for the worlhjpping of Go4>haue a certaine fhew of
feumility in this cjjcir obcdicncejy t;t they are not huble before God,
> . RRR iiij
Cap.io. Oftheoutwardmeanes
to whom they prefcribe the fame lawes which they them(elues da
kepe.This is the rcafon why Paul wiJlcth vs fo diligently to beware,
that we be not daceiued by the traditios of mcn& that which he cal-
Colo. j» Icth ethelothreskian that is, Wilwor{hipinuented of men befidc the
f. dodrine of God.This is venly true,both our owne wifdom,& al mes
wifdorh muft be foolilhe vnto vs, that we may fuffer him alone to be
vrifc. Which way they kccpe not which do ftudy with pety obferua-
tions fained by the wil of men to commend themfelues vnto him, &
do thruft vnto him as it were againft his wil a tranfgreflingc obedi-
ence toward him,whichis in dede giuen to men. As it hath bm done
both in many ages heretoforc,& in the time within our owne reme-
brance,& is alfo at this day done in thofc places where the authority
of the creature is more cftemcd than of the creator:where reiigio (it
yet the fame be worthy to be called religion) is defiled with more 8c
more vnfauory fupetftition$,than euer was any Paynime wickcdnes.
For what could the wit of men brcde but all things carnal] & foolifli
and fuch as truely refemblc their authors?
2y i/Vhcras alfo the Patrones of fuperftitions alleagcthat Samuel
.Sam.7 Sacrificed in Ramatha , and although the fame was done befidc the
7* law,yet it pleafed Godrthe folution is eafie, that it was not a ccrtame
fecod altar to fet againft the one only altar:but beicaufe the place was
not yet appointed for the arkc of couenant , he appointed the townc
where he dwelled for Sacrifices, as the mod conucnient dace. True-
ly the minde of the holy Prophet was not to make any innouation in
holy things, wheras God had fo ftreightly forbidden any thing to be
yj J, added orminiftied.Asfor the example of Menoha,! fay y it was an
J. extraordinary and fingular cafe.He being a priuatc man ofFrcd facri-
fice to God & not without* the allowance of God : verily becaufe he
cnterprifed it not of a rafh motio of his own minde>but by a hcauenly
inftindion. But how much the Lord abhorreth thofc things that ml
deuife of thcmlclues to worfhip him wichall, an other not inferior to
ud.8. Gedeonis a notable example, whofeEphod turned to def^ru^ion
7. not only to him and his family.but to the whole people.Finally cue-
ry new found inuention,wherwith men couetto worfhi[vGod,is no-
thing elfe but a defiling of true hoUnefle.
i6 Why then ( fay they ) did Chrift will that thofe intolerable
2j j J' burdens (hould be borne, which the Scribes and Pharifees bound v-
pon men?But why in an other place did the fame Chrift will that meit
fliould beware of the leue of the Phanfees' calling lcuen(a$ Mathew
the Euangelift expoundeth it) all their owne dodrinc that they
mingled with the purenes of the word of God? What would we haue
morf
To Saluation. Lib.4. 501
more plainc,than that wc be commaunded to flee and beware of all
their QO(5lrine?Whcreby it is made moft ccrtaine vnto vs,th3t in the
other pljce alio the Lorde willed not, that the confcienccs of hif
ftiould he vcxcdwith the Pharifees owne traditions. And the very
vi'or.lci,if they be not wrcfted/ounde of no fuch thing.For the Lord
pur^oiinsj there to cnuey fharply againft the maners of the Pba-
rjfcei , did firit limply inftrud them that heard him, that although
rfiey lawc nothing in their life mete for them to followe , yet they
fbould not cclle to do thofe things which they taught jn wordcs,
while they fate in the chaire of Mofes , that is , to declare the lawe.
Therefore be meant nothing els but to prouide that the common
people lliould noi: with the euill exaplcs of the teachers be brought
CO defpifethc oodrine. But forafmuchas many arc nothing at all
moued with reafons , but aiway require authornie , I will allege Au- in lol
giiftines wordeSjin which the very fame thing is fpoken.The Lordes Tra^
(hepefoldc hath gouernours,fomefaithfull,and fome hirclinges.The ^^'
gouernours tliat are faithfulljare true Paftors : but hearc ye,ihat the
birelinges alfo are neceflarie : for many in the Church following
carrhly profirs, do preach Chrift, and by them the voice of Chrift is
heard : and the Ihepe do followe , not a hireling , but the Paftor by
thcmeanesof a hireling. Heare ye that hirchnges are fhewcdby
the Lorde himfelfe. The Scribes ( faith he) and the Pharifees fittin
the chaire of Mofes. Do ye thofe things that they fay, but do not
thofe things that they do. What other thing faid he , but heare the
voice of the Paftor by the hirelinges?For in fittins; in the chaire they
teach the lawc of God: therefore God tcachethby rhem.Butifthey
Will teach their owne,heare it not,do it not.This faith Auguftine.
27 But whereas many vnf kilfiill men, when they here that con-
fcienccs are wickedly bounde and God worfhipped in vaine with
the traditios of men,do at ones blott out altogether all lawes where-
by the order of the Church is fet in frame : therefore it isconuc
nient alfo to mete with their error : Verily in this point it is cafy to
be deceiued , becaufe at the firft fight it doth not by and by appearc
what difference is bctweene the one fort and the other. But I wii] i'o
plainly in fewc wordes fett out the whole matter , that the likeneffc
maydecciue no man. Firft let v$ holde this > that if we fee in eucry
fellowfhip of men ibme pohcie to be neceflarie , that may fcrue to
nourifh common peace and to rcicine concorde:if we fe that in the
doing of things there is alway fome orderly forme, which is behouc-
fiiUfor publike honeftieand for very humanitie not to be refufed:
the fame ought chiefely to be obferucd in Churchcs>which are both
Cap.io, Of the outwardc mcancs
bcft mauiteincd by a well framed difpoticion of all chin§s,& withouc
agreement arc no Churches at all. Therfore if wc will haue the fafc-
de of the Church well prouidcd for , we muft altogether dihgcnily
procure that which Paulecommaundeth ,thac all things be done
comelily and according to order. But forafmuch as there is fo great
diueriuie in the maners of men,fo great varietie m mindcs > To great
difagreement in judgements and wittes : neither is there any pohcic
ftcdfaft enough , vniefle it be ftablifhed by ccrtaine lawes , nor any
orderly vfjge can be obferucd without a certaine appointed forme;
Therefore wc arc Co farreof from condemning the lawes that are
profitable to this purpofc, that we affirmc that when thofe be takea
away , Churches are diflblucd from their finewes , and vtterly de-*-
formed and fcattered abrode. For this which Paule requireth , that
all things be done decently and in order,can not be had, vnlelTe the
order it fclfc and comehneffc be ftabli{hed,with obferuaiios adioined
as with certame bondes.Butthis onely thing is alvvay to be excepted
in thofc obferuati5s,that they be not either beleued to be necelfary
to faluation.andfo bindc confcicnccs with religion,or,bc applied to
the worHiipping of God,and fo godlineflc be repofed in them.
28 We haue therefore a very good and moft faithfull marke,
which putteih diftcrence betwenc thofe wicked ordinances,by which
we haue fayed that true rehgionis darkened and confciencesfub-
ucrtcd.and the lawful! obferuations of the Church : if wc remember
th:ii the lawfull obferuations tende alwav to one of thcfe two things
or to both together, that in the holy aflembly of the faithfullall
things be done comely and with fuch dignitie as befeemethranU thac
the very common fellowfhip of menfhould be kept in order asic
were by certaine botides of humanitie and moderation. For when ic
is ones vnderftode that the lawe is made for publike honefties fake,
the fupcrftition is nowe taken away , into which they fall that mea-
fure the worlliippingof God by the inuentios of men. Again when
it IS knowerl that it perteineth to comon vfe, then that falfe opinion
ofljond and neceflitie is ouerthrowen,w hich did ftrike a great terroc
into confcicnces , when traditions were thought neceflarie to faliia-
tion. For herein is nothing required but that charitieftiould with
common dutiefuil doing be nourifhed among vs.But it is good yet to
define more plainely, what is comprehended vnder thst comelinefle
which Paule commendeth , and alfo what vnder order. The ende of
comehnefie is, partly that when fuch Ceremonies are vfed as may
procure a reucrence to holy things,wc may by fuch helpes be ftirred
vpto godlineflc : partly alfo that the modeilic andgramtic which
ought
To Saluation. Lib.4, 502
iniglit to be fecn in all honcft doings may thenn principally appearc.
In order, this is the firft puinc , that they which gouerne may knowc
the rule and lawcto rule well :and the people which arc goucrned
may be accuftomed to obeying of God,.ind to right difciplinciThcn,
that the (tace of the Church being well framed, peace & quietneffc
may be prouidcd for.
29 Therefore we rtiall not fay that comlinefle is, wherein flialbc
nothing butraine deledaiion:fuch as we fe in that phiyerUkeap-
parell which the Papiftes vfc in their ceremonies , where appeareth
nothmgels but an vnprofitable viforofgainefle, and excefle without
frute. But we lliall accompt that to be comelineflc which (hall fo be
mete for the rcuerencc ot holy mifteries , that it be a fitt cxercife to
godhiiefle.or at lealt fucli as lliall ferue to conueiuent garnifhing for
the celebrating thereof : and the fame not without frute , but that it
may put the faithful! in mmde with ho we great modcliie , religiouf.
oclte and reuerencc , they oucht to handle holy things Nowc , that
cererrvomes may be exercifes of godlini fle , it is nectflarie that they
leade vs the ftreight way to Chrift. Likewife we may not fay that
order confiikth in thofe tnflmg pompcs that haue nothing els than
a vamlhjng gainelfe : but that it ftandeth in fuch an orderly frammg
as may take away all confu(ion , barbaroufneifc , obftinacie , and all
ftriucs & diflfcntions.Of the hrft fort are thefe examples in Paulrthat ,.Cot
prophane bankettingcs fhould not be mingled with the tioly Supper n. n,
of the Lorde : that women lliould not come abrode,but coueredand ^"d j
many other which we hauc in common vfc : as this , that we pray
kneling and bare bedded :thdt we minifter the Lordes Sacraments
not vnclenly,but with fomc dignitie:that m the burying of the dead
we yfe fome honeft thewc:and other things that are of the fame fort.
Of the other kindearcthe honrcs appointed for publike prnyers.
Sermons , and celebrations of mifteries : at Sermons, quietntlTt; and j (^^
filencCjplaces appointed, fingin^ together of Hymncsdayes prefixed 14. j^
for celebrating of the Lordes Supper ,th.it Paule forbiddeth that
women fhould teach in the Church,and fuch like. But fpecially thofe
things that concerne difciplinc , as the teaching of the Catcchifme,
the ccnfures of the Church, excommunication, falhngs, and luchas
may be reckened in the fame number. So all the conftitutions of the
Church , which we receiuc for holy and holfome , we may refcrre to
two chiefe titles : for fome perteine to rites and ceremonies , and the
other to difciplme and peace.
50 But becaule here is perilljcift on the one lidc the falfe biiTiops
(hould thereby catch a prctenfc to ezcufs their wicked and cytanous
Cap.io, or the outwarde'meanes
la\vrs,& ieaft onthc other lide there be fooie men to fear full, whicb
admonirtied wich the aforefaid euels do leaJe no place to lawes be
tiiey ncucr ib holy : here it is good to proteft , that I allowe .onely
thofe ordinances of mcn,which be both grounded vpon the autho-
ritic of God,and taken out of the fcripturc,yea and altogether Gods
ovvne. Let vs take for an example the knehng which is vCcd in time
of common prayer.Il is demandcd,whethcr it be a tradition of man,
which euery man may lawfully refufe or ncgled- I fay that ir is fo of
men, that 1 1 is alfo of God. It is of God , in refped that it is a part of
tbat comclincfle , the care and kcpmg whereof is commended vnto
vs by the ApoftIe:ic is of men, in refped that it fpecially becokeneth
that which had m generaltie rather bene pointed co,than declared*
By this one example we may iudgc, what is to be thought of thac
whole kinde : verily becaufe the Lord hath in his holy Oracles both
faithfully conteined and clcrely fet foorth both the whole fumme of
true rightcoufncifcjand all the partes of the worfhipping of his djuinc
maieftie , and whatloeucr was ncceflarie to faluation : therefore in
ihcic things he is only to be heard as our fcholcmaftcr. But becaufe
in outward difcipline and Ceremonies his will was not to prefcnbc
ech thing particulaily what we ought to followe (becaufe he fore(aw
tins to hang vpon the ftatc of times , and did not thinke one forme
to be Htt for all ages) herein we muft flee to thofe generall rules
which he hath geucn , that thereby all thofe things fhould be tried
which the neceiruie of the Church fliall require to be commaunded
for order and comelinefle. Finally,Forafmuch as he hath therefore
taught nothing cxprell/jbecaufe thcfe things both are not neceflary
to faluation , and according to the mancrs of euery nation and age
ought diuerfly to be applied to the edifying of the Churchithereforc
as the profit ofthe Church ihall require,it (halbe conuenient as well
lo change and abrogate thofe that be vfed , as to inftitutenewc. I
graunt in deede,that we ought not raflily.nor oft,nor for hght cmks
torunne to innouation. But what may hurt or edifie , charitie (hall
btft iudgetwhich if we will fuffer to be the gouerneflre,all l"hall be fate.
^ I Nowe It is the dutie of Chriftian people.to kepe fuch things
as haue bene ordeined according to this rulc,wirh a free confcience
and without any fuperftitionjbut yet with a godly and eafy redineflc
to obey , not to defpife them , not to pafle them ouer with careleffe
negligence : fo firre is it of, that they ought by pride and obftinacie
openly tobreakc them. What maner of hbertie of confcience (will
thoo fay) may there be in fo great obferuation and wareneiFe ? Yea,
tt (hall ftande excellently well when wc (hall confider , that they ard
To Saluauon. Lib.4. 503
not ftedfaft and perpetuall ftayed lawes j.w hereunto wc be boundc,
butoutwiidc rudcmcntsforthe wcakcneflc of men: which ahhough
*ve do not all neede,yet we do all vfe them, becaufe wc are mutually
one boundc to an other, to nourifti chariiie among vs. This we may
reknowledgc in the examples aboue rcherfed. What? Doih religion
ftandein a womans veile , that it is notl.iwefuli logoout ofdorcf
with her hcd vncouered?Is that l;oly decree of Ins coccrning iilcnce,
fuch as can nor he broken without nioit hainousoffenccr'Is there any
mifterie in kneling,or in burying of a dead carcafe, that may not be
omitted without finner" No. For if a woman necdc-,for the helping of
berneighbor, tomake fuch haft as may not luft'er hcrtocouernei
hed,{he oftendcth not if fhe runne ihtther with her hed vncoueredl
And it may fometime befal that it may be noleife conucnient foe
her to fpcaife^than at an other time to holde her peace. And there as
no caufe to the contrary , but that he which by rea(bn of difeafc can
not bowe his knees may pray ftandmg. Finally, it is better to burie a
dead man ipedely in time , than when they lackc a winding fhcte , or
when there be not men prefent to conuey him , to tarry till he rote
vnburied.But ncuerthelefl'e in thefe things there is fomewhat which
the m.aner and ordinances of the contree , and finally very naturall
honeftie and the rule of modeftie apointeth to be done or auoidei
wherein jf amjan fwarue anything from them,by vnw3renefle,or
forgetflilnefle, there is no crime committed*, bucifvpon contempt,
fuch itubbornncfle is to be difallowed. Likewifc the dayes them-
feiucs,whichthey be,andthc houres,and howc the places be bilded,
and what Pfalmcs be fons vpon which dayjit maketh no matter. Bot
it is mete that there be both certaine dayes, and appointed houre$9
and a place fitt to receiue all , if there be regarde had of the prefer-
uation of peace. For howe greate an occahon of brawlings fhouki
the confufion of thefe things be , if it were lawfull for eucry man , as
he lift, to change thofe things that belong to common ftate : foraf-
much as it will neuer come to paflc that one fame thing ihsll plcate
all men j if things be leftc as it were in xh6 middcft to the choile of
cuery man f If any man do carpe againft vs , atid will herein be more
wife than he ou^hc,lethim fchimfelfe by whatreafon hecandc*
fendehisownc precifenefl'e totheLorde. As for vs, this faying of
Paule ought to fatisfie vs , that we hauc not an vie to contcnde ,nor «,Cor»
the Churches of God. • ii.i4.
gr Moreouer it is with greit diligence robe endcuo^ed,t^3r no
error crepe in, that may corrupt orobfcure this put e vfe. Which
ihalbc obteincd,if all obrcruations,whacroeuer they ikilbe^fiiall hau«
Cap. 1 1 . Of the outward meancs
afhcwcof manifcftc profit, and it very fevve bereceiued^butprin-
cipaJly if there be adjoined a faithful! doctrine of ihe Paftor, that
may ftoppe vp the way to pei uerfc opinios-This knowledge maketb^
that in all thefe things encry man may haue his ownc libertie pre-
feruedjanc ncuenhelefle lliall willingly charge his owne libcrtie with
a cerraine neccfikie , fo farre as either this comelinefle that we hauc
fpoken of, or rhe order of Chaiitie Ihall require. Secondly >that
both we our fclucs ihould without any liipei ftition be bulicd in the
obferuing of thofe things , and fhould not to precifcly require them
of other , fo as wc fhould think the worlliipping of God to be the
better for the multitude of Ceremonies : that one Church lliould
not dcfpifc an other for the diueriitie of difcipline: iaftof all that
fctting herein no perpetualllawc toourfelucs,weihouldreferre the
whole vfe and cnde of obferuatios to the edification of the Church,
that, when it requireth we may without any offenfe futfcr not onely
fomwhat to be changed, but all the obferuations that were before in
vfe among vs,to be altered.For this age is a prefent experience, that
certaine rites , which otherwife arc not vn godly nor vncomely , may
according to the fit occafion of y matter,be conucniently abrogate.
For ( fuch hath bene the blindeneffe and ignorance of the former
times) Churches haue heretofore , with fo corrupt opinion and wirh
fo ftiffe afFcdion , fticked in Ceremonies , that they can fcarcelybc
Sufficiently purged from monftruous fuperlhttons , but that many
Ceremonies muft be taken away,which in oldc time were paraduen-
ture ordeined not without caufe , and of theii)felues haue no notat
ble vngodlincfle in them.
The xj. Chapter.
Ofthi iHrifdaHiOTi of the ^hnrch , and the a'attfe thereof , fuck
M ii feen in the '7apacie.
"TOw rcmaineth the third part of the power of the Church,
j^ I yea and the chiefe parte in a well ordered ftate , which wc
haue fayed to cofifte in iurifdid:ion.The whole iurifdidion
of the Church perteineth to the difcipline of maners, of
which we lliall cntrate by and by.Forafmuch as no citie,or no towne
can Ihnde without Magiftrat and policy : fo the Church of God (as
I haue already taught,but nowe I am compelled to repete it againe)
necdeth her certaine fpirituall policy : but fuch as is vtterly feuercd
from the ciuile policie,and doth fo nothing hinder or minifh it,thac
jt rather doth much helpe and further it. Therefore this power of
iunididion fhail in a futnmc be nothing els but an order framed for
chc
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 504
the prcfcruation of fpintuall pclicie. To this endc from the begin-
ning were ordeined ludiciall orders it\ Churches , which might vfc
examinatio of mancrs,corred vices, & excrcife the office of the kcies.
This order Paul fpeakethof m the Epiftle to the Corinthians, when i.Cbe,
he nameih gouernements. Againe to the Romaines , when he faith: i » st. ,
let him that ruleth , rule in carefulnefle. For he fpeakcth not to the ^<>^
magiftrats,(for at that time there were no Chriftia magiltrats) but to * **
them that were ioined with the Paftors for the fpintuall goucrnc-
ment of the Church. Alfo in the EpilUe to Timothce,he maketh two '^ tt%,
fortes of Eldcrsifomejthat labor in the word:othcr rome,that do not ^'^^'
vfe the preaching of the word,and yet do rule well.By this later fort
it is no dout that he meancih them that were appointed to loke vnto
wancrsjand to the whole vfc of the keyes.For this power, of which
we nowe fpeake , hangeth wholly vpon the keyes which Chrift gauc
tQ the Churchjin the xviij.Chap.of Mathcwe : where he commaun-
dethjthat theyfhoulde belharply admonifhed in the name of the
ivhole Church , that hauc defpifed priuate monitions : but if the/
go forward in their obftinacie , he teacheth that they {hould be put
out of the fellowlhip of the faithfull . But thefe monitions andcor-
redions can not be without knowledge of the caurc:thereforc there
necdeth both fome iudgement and order. Wherefore vnleflc we will
make void the promife of the keyes, and take vtterly away excomu-
nication,foiemne monitions,and all fuch things whatfoeuer they be:
we muft nedcs geue to the Church fome iurifdidion.Lct the readers
marke that that place entrcatetb not of the gencrall authoritie of
dodrine,as in the. xvj.Chapt.of Mathewe,and the.xxj.of Iohn:buc
that the power of the Sinagoge is for the time to come transferred
to the flocke of Chrift. Vnrill that day the lewes had their order (A
gouerning , which Chrift ftablifhcth in his Church , and that with
great pcnaltie,fo much is concerneth the pure inftitution of it. For
io it behouedjforafmuch asotherwife the iudgement of an vnnoblc
and vnrcgarded congregation might be defpifed of rafli and proudc
men. And that it fhould not encomber the reders,that Chnft doth in
the fame words exprcfle thmgs fcmewhat differinge one from the
other , it flialbe profitable to diffolue this dout. There be therefore
two places, that fpeake of binding and loofing.The one is in the. xvj.
Chapter of Mathewc , where Chnft, after that he had promifed that
he would geue to Peter the keyes of the kingdomeof heauenjim^-
mediaily addeth , that whatlocuer he ftiall binde or loofe in earth,
flialbe confirmed in heauen. In which wordes he mcaneth none ;oS,x»»
•thcr thing, than he doch by other wordcs in lohn , when fending jj.
i Cap.ii. Of the outwarde mcanes
Mit,i6. his difciples to prcache , after that he had breathed vpon them he
^^' faid : whofc finnes yc forgeue , they (halbc forgeuen : and whocs yc
rctcine,they {halbe rcteined in hcauen.I will bring an expolition not
futtlc,not enforced, not wrefted : but naturall,flowing , and offring it
fclfe. This commaundemcnt of forgeuing and reteining finnes, and
that promife of binding and loofing made to Peter, ought to be re-
ferred to no other thing but to the miniftery of the wordiwhich wbe
the Lorde committed to the Apoftles , he did therewith alfo arme
them with this office of binding and looiing. For what is the fumme
of the GofpeIl,but that we all being the bondferuantes of finnc and
of death,are loofcd & made free by the redemption that is in Chrill
lefus : and that they which do not rccciue nor acknowledge Chrift
their deliuercr and redcmer, are damned & adiudgcd to euetlafting
bondcs ? When the Lorde dcliuered this maflage to his Apoftles , to
be carried into all nations : to approue that it was his owne and prp-^
ceding from himfflfc, he honored it with this noble tcfiimonicrand
that to the fingular ftrengthcning both of the Apoftles themfeluey,
and of all ihofctowhom it (hould come. It behouedthat theAr
poftles fhouldehauca ftcdfaft andfbunde certaintieof their prea-
ching, which they fho!ild not only execute with infinite labors,carcs,
troubles and dangers , but alfo at the laft feale it with their blood.
That they might (I fay) knowc the fame to be not vaine nor voide,
but full of power and force : it behoued that in fo great carefulnefle,
in fo great hardncfic of things , and in fo great dangers , they fhould
be pcrfuadcd that they did the bufinefle of God : that when all the
world withftode them and fought againft them , they fhould knowc
that God ftode on their fide ; that hauing not Chrift the author of
their doftrinc prefent by fight in earth,they fhould vnderftande him
to be in heaucnjto confirmc the trueth of the dodrine which he had
dcliuered them. It behoued againe that it fhould alfo bcmoftcer-
tainely proued by tcftimony to the hearers jthat that dodrine of the
Gofpcll was not the word of the Apoftles , but of God himfelfe.not
a voice bred in earth.but come downe from heauen.For thefc thngs,
the forgeuenefTe of finnes , the promife of euerlaftinghfe, the mef-
fas^e of faluation, can not be in the power of man. Therefore Chrift
hath teftified, that in the preaching of the Gofpell there is nothing
of the Apoftlesjbut the onely miniftery : that it was he himfelfe that
fpake and promifed all things by their mouths as by inftrumentsrand
therefore that the forgeuenefTe of finnes which theypreached,wa$
the true promife of God:and the damnatio which they pronounced,
was the certainc iudgemem of God.But this tcftifying is geucn to all
ages.
To Saluation. Lib.4. 505
ages , and rcmaincth in force^io ccrtific and aifurc all men , that the
word of the Gofpcll, by what man focucr it be preached, is the very
fenrence of Godjpubhflied at the foucraigne iudgcmct reatc,writicn
in the boke of hfc,ratificd,firmc & fixed in hcaucn.Thus we fee that
in thofc places the power of the keycs is nothing but the preaching
of the Gofpelliand that it is not To much a power as a min!ftery,if we
hauc refped to men. For Chnft hath not geuen this power proprcly
to men,but to his owne word, whereof he hath made men minillcrs.
2 The other place whicii wehauefaid to be, concerning the Mac.iS,
pov/er of binding and loofing, is inihe.xviij. chapter of Maihewc, ^7*
where Chrill faith.If any brother hcare notthcChurch,Jci him be
to thee as a heathc man or a publicane. Verily 1 fay vnto you:what-
foeuer yc bind vppon earth,lh.dbc bound alfo m he^ucnrwhatfoeuec
ye loofe fhalbe loofed. This place is not altogether like the Hrft, but
is a litle othcrwife to be vndeiftanded. But 1 do not io make them
diuerfe, that they haue not great affinitie to^cther.This fint point is
like in both,thac either of them is a generail fentcnce : that in both
there is alway all one power of binding and loofing , namely by the
word of God, all one commaundemtnt, all one promiic. But herein
they difFer,thaty firft place pecuharly bdongcth iopfeaching,which
the Minifters of the wordc do execute : this later place to the difci-
plme of Excommunication,which is committed to the Church.Thc
Church bindethjwhome Ihe cxcomunicareth:not that flie ihroweth
him into perpetuall ruine and defperation, but becaufe fhe condem-
neih his hfe and maners, ai>d vnltffc he repent , doth already warne
him of his damnation. She loofeth whom fhe receiueth into com-
munion : becaufe One doth make him as it were parraker of the vnitic
which fhe hath m Chrift Icfus. Therefore that no man fliould obfti-
nately dcfpife the lodgement of the Church , or little rcgarde that
he IS conden\ned by the confenting voices of rhe faithfull : the Lord
refttfieth that fuch iudgement of the faithfull is nothing cl$ but a
publilhing of his owne fentence:and that whatfoeuer they do in
earth^s cofirmed in hcauen.For they haue the word of God,where-
by they may condcmne the peruerfe ; they haue the word,whcrcby
they may receiue iherepentantintogra.ee. And they can not crrc,
nor diffent from the iudgement of God : becaufe they iudge not but
after the lawe of God,which is not an vnccrtainc or earthly opinion,
but the holy will of God, and a beauenly Oracle. Our of theie two
places, which T thinke I haue botli brefely and famihaily wd iruely
expounded , thofc furious men without difference as they be caned
With their owne giddinefleigo about to Qabli/h fometime cofedjon.
Cap. 1 1 . Of the outwardc mcancs
fometime excommunication , fometime iurifdidion , fometime the
power CO make lawcs,(bmtimc pardons. But the firft place they allege
to ftablifh the fupremicie of the See of Rome : they can fo well fkiU
to Htc their keyes toalilockes anddores^thaca man may fay they
haue pr^ftifcd fmithcs craft all their hfe.
g For whereas many thinke that thofe things endured but for a
time, when the Magiftrats were yet ftrangers from the profeflion of
our religion : they are deceiued m this, that they confider not, howc
great difference and what maner of vnlikeneflc there is of the Ecele-
fiallicall and ciuile power.For the Church hath not the power of the
fwerd to punifh or rcftrain, no empire to commaundc,no prifon, no
other pains which the Magiftrat is wont to lay vpon men. Againe,it
tendeth not to this end, that he that hath finned ihould be punilhed
againft his will, but {hould with willing chaftifement profelTe his re-
pentaccTherfore there is a farre diuers order.-becaufe neither doth
the Church take to it felfe any thing which proprely belongeth to
the MagiUrac , nor the magidrat can execute that which the Church
doth.This (lialbc made plainer by an examplc.Is any man dronkc?In
a well ordered citic prifon (halbe his punjlhmet.Hath he committed
fornicationcHc (hall hauclike,or rather greater punilhment. So (hall
both the lawes,and the magi{irat,and outward ludgemec be fatisfied.
But it may be that he fhall geue no fignificationot repentance , but
rather murmurc & grudge againft ic.Shali the Cht»rch in this cafe do
nothing? But fuch can not be receiued to the Supper,withouc doing
%rrong both to Chrift and his holy inftitution. Andrcafon requirctfi
this . that he which offendeth the Church with an euill example,
ihould with folemne declaration of repentance take away the of-
fence which he hath raifed.The reafon which they bring that are <^
cotrary opinion,is to coldc. Chrift fay they committed thcfe doings
to the Church , when there was no magiftrat to execute them. But it
happeneth oftentimes that the magiftrat is more negligent,yca fom-
timc peraduenture that himfclfe is to be chaftifed , which happened
to the Emperor Theodofius. There may beftde thisafmuch be faid
of the minifteric of the word. Nowe therefore after their, fcntencc,
let Paftors ceffe to blame manifeft wicked doings , let them cefle to
chide , to reprouc , to rebuke : for there be Chriftian magiftrates,
which ought to corred thefe things with the lawcs and with the
fwerd. But as the Magiftrat ought by puniftiing , and by reftraining
with force , to purge the Church of offences : fo Iikewife the mi-
niftcr of the word for his part ought to hclpc the magiftrat that there
may not fo many offende* So ought iheir wotkings to be conioincd,
that
To Saluation. Lib.4, . 50^
that tbc one may be a hclpcnpt a hindrance to the other.
4 And trucly if aman morencrdy wcy the woidesofChrift,'
he fliall eaHly perceiuc thar in chefe places,is defcribed a Qjycd fhcc,
and a pcrpctuall order of :he Church , not fuch as enduret h but for
a time. For it not mete that we fhould accufe them to the magiftrat,
that will not obey our monitions : which yet lliould be ncceflary if
thema:,iftrat fucceded into the office of the Church. Wiiat is this
promife ? bhall we fay that it is a piomife of one or a fewc yeres?
Verily veiily 1 fay vnto you^whailocucr ye bind in earth?Moreouer
Chnlt did here inftitutc no ncwe thing, but followed thccuftomc
alway obferued in the auncicnt Church of his owne nation:whereby
he lignified that the Church can nor want thefpirituall lorifdidiion,
which hadde bene frpm the beginning. And this hath bene confir-
med by the confent of all times. For when Emperors and mai^iftrats
began to profeflfe Chrift,the fpiritualliurifdidion was not by and by
abolilhcd : but oncly fo ordred , that it lliould diminiih nothing of
the ciuilc lurifdidionjor be confounded wirh it. And rightfully, For
the magiftratjif he be godly,wilI not exempt hlmfclfc fro the com-
mon fubiedion of the children of God,whereof it is not the Idl part
to lubmit himfelfe to the Church , iudging by the word of God : ^o
farrcitisof, that he ought to take away that order of ludgement.
For what is more honorable (faith Ambrofe) for the Empcror,than Epifto.
to be called the fonne of the Church?For a.good Emperor is within '^'* *^
the Church,not aboue the Church, Therefore they,whiGh to honor ^^^'
the Magtftrat do fpoile the Church of this power,do not oncly with
faife cxpofition corrupt the fentence of Chrift,but alfodo not fclcn-
derly condemne fo many holy Bifhops which hauc bene from the
time of the Apoltles , that they haueby falfc preteng: vfurpedihc
honor and office of the Magiftrat.
5 But on the other fide it is tzood to fee this.what was in oldc time
the true vfc of the luritdidion of the Church, and howc great abufc
is crcptc in , that we may knowe what is to be abrogate , and what is
to be reftored of antiquiric , if we wiUoucrthrowe the kingdome of
Antichiift,and fet vp the true kingdome of Chrift againc.Firft this is
the markc to be ffiottc at , that offences be preuented, and if any of-
fence be rifen vp, that it may be abohfhed. In the vfc two things arc
to be confidcred:firft,that this fpirituall povfer be altogether feucred
from the power of the fwerd:then,that it be not executed by the wili
of one man,but by a lawfull affcmbly. Both thcfc thing* were obfcr- *
ucd in the purer Church. For the holy Biihops did not exercile their
power with Hnes^^r cmpri(onmcn(s,or other ciuile punilLmcnu:biit
^^% ij
Cap. 1 1 . .Of the outwarde meancs
they vfed the oncly worci of the Lordcas they ought to do. For the
feuereft reuengc , and as it were the vttermoft thunderbolt of the
Church is excommunication, which is not yfed but in neceflitic. But
this requireth neither force nor ftrong hande, but is c6tcnt with the
power of the word of God.Finally the iurifdidio of the olde Church
was nothing els but a declaration in pradifc ( as I may fo call it) of
a. Cor. that which Paul teachcth concerning tlie fpirituail power of Paftors,
*°' ^' There is ( faith he ) power geuen to vs , whereby we may throws
down ftrong holdcs, whcrby we may make low all height thathftech
vp it fcife againft the knowledge of God , whereby we may fubdue
all thought, and maylcadeiteaptiue into the obedience of Chriftj
and we haue in rcadineflc a reucnge againft all difobedicnce. As chic
is done by the preaching of the dodrine of Chrift : (o, leaft the doc-
trine (hould be fcorned, according to that which is taught ought
they to bciudged which profeffe thcmfclues of the houlhould of
faith.Biit that can not be done, vnleflc there be ioined with the mi-
niftcrie a power to call them that are to be priuately admoni(hed,or
to be more iharply correded,and alfo a power to exclude them from
i.Cor. the communion of the Supper, which can not be receiued without
J«* *• prophaning of fo great a miftcrie.Thercforc when in an other place
he faith,that it belongeth not to vs to iudge ftragers, he maketh the
children fubied to the cenfurcs of the Church , which may chaftife
their faukes:and he fecretely lignifieth that th^re were then iudiciaU
orders in force from yJhkh none of the faithfuU was free.
6 But fuch authority (as we haue declared) was not in the power
of one man,to do euery thing accordmg to his owne will : but in the
power of the afl'emblie of the Elders , which was the fame thing iir
Epifto the Church tl\at a Senate is in a City.Cyprian,when he maketh men-
i4.&.^. jIqj, jjy whom itwas cxercifcd in his time , vfeth to ioinc the whole
^ '*' Clcrgie with the bifhop. But in an other place alfo he ftieweth, that
the very clergy fo gouerncd ,that in the meane time the people was
not excluded from the hearing of matters. For thus he writeth : Sins
the beginning of my bilhoprike 1 haue determined to do nothing
without the coun fell of the clergic and confcntof the people. But
this was the common and vfuall maner , that the iurildiftion of the
Church (hould be exercifed by a Senate of Elders : of whom ( as I
haue fayed) there were tWo fortes : For fome were ordeincd to t ea-
ching,& other fome were oncly iudges of maners.By httle and little
J ^ this inftitution grewe out of kinde from the firft beginning of it : fo
pii.'ad ^^^^ ^"^" ^" ^^^ ^'"'^ °^ Ambrofe onely clerkcs were iudges in cc-
Tim. cleHafticall iudgemems.Which thing he himfelfe complatneth of in
(hefe
To Saluation. Lib.4. 507
thcfc wordes :Thc olde Sinagogc (faith he) and finsthattimc the
Church hath had Elders,without whocs counfell nothing was done.
Which by what negligence it is growcn out of vi*e, I knowe not , vn-
Icife pcraduenturc by the llouthfulneffe or rather the pride of the
teachers , while they alone would be thought to be fomewhat. We
fee howe much the holy man is difpleafed , that any thing of the
better ftatc is decayed , when notwithftanding they had«yct con-
tinuing an order that was at the leaft tolerable. What then would
he do if he fawe thefc deformed ruincs that {hewe almoft no fignc
of the oldc bilding?What beway ling would he vfe? Firft againft la we
»nd right, the Biihop hath claimed to himfelfe alone, that which was
gcuen to the whole Church. For itishkeas if theConful,driuing
out the Senate > (hould take the empire vpon himfelfe alone. But as
hcis aboue the rcik in honor, fo in the whole afTemblie is more au-
thoritieihan In one man. Therefore itwas to wicked a deede, that
one man,remouing the comon power toliimfelfejhath both opened
anentrieto tyrannous luft, and hath taken from the Church that
which belonged vnto her, and hath fuppreflfed and put away the af-
fcmblie ordeincd by the Spirit of Chrift.
7 But ( as of one eujll alway groweth an other) Biihops difdai"*
ning it as a thing vnworthie of their carc,hauc committed it ouer to
other.Hereupon are created Oificials to ferue that roome : I do not
yet fpeake what kind of men they be, but oncly this I fay ,that they
nothing dift'cr from prophanc ludges. And yet they ftill call it a fpi-
ritualliurifdidion , where men contende about nothing but earthly
matters. Although there were no more cucU , with what face dare
they call a brawling court the iudgement of the Church ? But there
arc monitionsjthere is excommunication. So verily they mocke with
God.Doth a poore man owe a Uttle money ?he is citcd:if he appeare,
he is condemned. When he is condemnedjif he do not fatisfie it, he
is moniflied : after the fecondc monition they procede one fteppc
toward excommunicaiio : if he appeare not,he is monifhed to come
& yeJd himfelfe to iudgement:if he then make delay,he is monifhed,
and byandby excommunicate. I befech you, what is there any thing
like either to the inflituiion of Chrift,or to the auncicnt maner,or to
an Ecclcfiafticall ordcr?But there is alfo correftion of vices.But howe?
verily they not oncly fufFer but with fecrct allowance do after a cer-
taine maner chcrifh and confirmc adulterieSjWantonneflejdronken-
pcffe and fuch kinde of mifcheuous doinges : and that not onely in
the comon people, but alfo in the dcrgie themfelues.Of many they
caU«ifcwc befof c them^cuhci: chat they ihould not feeme floutb^ill
SSS iij
Cap. 1 1 . Of the outwarde meancs
in winking at thcm,or that they may milkc out fomc money.I fpcake
notofthc pill3ges,robberics,briberics,& facrileges that arc gathered
thereby, I fpeake not what mancrof men arc for the moft parte
choUn to this office. This is enough and too much , that when the
Romaniftes do boaft that their iurifiltdion is fpirituall , itiscafieto
fhewe that th^rc is noihinge more contrary to the order inftitute o£
Chrill,»ndth3t it hath no more Jikenefle to the auncient cuftome
than darkeneflc hath to hght.
8 Although we haue not fpokcn all things that might be alleagcd
for this purpofc , and thofe thingcs that we haue fpoken of are knit
vpin fcwc worde$:yetl truft that we haue To fought it out,that there
is nowe no more caufc why any roan fhould douc , that the fpirituall
power whereof the Pope with all hiskingdomc proudely glorieth,
is wicked agamft God, and an vniuft tyranny oucr his people. Vnder
the name of fpirituall power I comprehendc both boldeneflc in fra-
ming new dodrinc$,wherewith they haue turned away y iily people
from the naturall pureneflc of the word of God, and the wicked tra-
ditions wherewith they haue fnarcd them , andalfo the falfc cccle-
fi-ifticall iurifdidio which they execute by Suffraganes and Officials.
For if we graunt vnto Chrift a kingdome among rs , it is not polTiblc
but that all this kind of dominion muft immcdiatly be oucrthrowcn
and fall downe. As for the power of the fwerd which they alfo geue
torthem fclues,bccaure it is not exercifed vppon confcienccs , it pcr-
taineth not to oijr prefent purpofe to cntrcate of it In which bchdfe
yet it is alfo to norcjthat they be alway like thefelues, verily nothing
lefTe than that which they would be taken for^that is to fay,Pattours
of the ChurchjNeither do I blame y peculiar faults of men, but the
common wickedncffeofthe whole order, yea the very peftilenceof
the ordcrrforafmuch as it is thought that the iame (hould be maimed,
vnlefle it be glorioufly fet forth with wealth and proudc titles. If we
require the auihoritie of Chrift conccrniog this matter, it is no douK
Mat.io but that his minde wastodebarrcthe minifters of his wordc from
Luc I ciuile dominion and earthly gouemcment,whcn he fay d,Tbc kings
25. * of the Gentiles bearc rule oucr them : but you ffiall not fo. For he
fignifieth not onely that the office of Paftor is diftin«fl from the office
of a Prince, but that they be things fo feucrcd , that they can not
mete together in one man.For whcras Mpfes did bearc both the of-
fices together : Firft , that was done by a rare miracle : againc.it was
but for a time till things were better fctt in order.But when a ceriaine
forme was ones prefcribcd of God, the ciuilc gouerncment was left
vnto him , and he was commaunded to rcHgne the pricfthode to his
brother.
To Saluation, • Lib.4. 508
brother. And worthily. Font is abouc nature , that one man fhould Ex i g.
fuffife to bearc both burdens. And this hath in all ages bene dihgent- * ^
ly obferued in the Church. And there was neuer any of the Bifhops,
fo long as the true forme of the Church endured,that ones thought
of vfurping the power of the fwcrd : h that this #3S a common pro-
uerbe in the time of Ambrofe,that Emperors rather couetedthc Homif.
priefthode.than pricfts the empire. For this which he afterward faith, dcBa{Tl.
was emprintedin the raindes of all men : chat palaces perteinedto ^radcii.
the Empcror,and Churches to the prieft.
9 But fins that a way hath bene deuifed, whereby bKhops might
bolde the title , honor and rjchcfTe of their office without burden or
carc;le aft they (hould be lefte altogether idle, y power of the fvverdc
was geuen them,or rather they did by vfurpation take it vpon thcm-
felues. By what color will they defend this fhamelefneire:' Was this
theduticof bifhops towrappe themfclucs with iudiciall hearing of
caufesjwith the gouernements of cities and prouinces, and through
large circuites to meddle in bufincfles fo vnpertcining to them:which
haue fo much worke and bufineflein their owne office, that if they
were wholy and coiinually occupied in it.and were withdrawen witn
no callings away from it^yet they were fcarcely able to fatisfie it J* But
(fuch is their waiwardncfle)they fticke not to boft,that by this meanc
the Church doth floridi according to her wor£hine{re>and that they
themfelues in the meane time are not to much drawen away from
the duetics of their vocation. As touching the firft point : if this be %
comely ornament of the holy office, that they be aduaunced to fuch
heighth, thai: the hieft monarches may ftand in feare of them : then
they haue caufe to quarell with Chrift , which hath in fuch fort gre-
uoufly pinched their honor. For, at left in their opinion, what could
haue bene fpoken more difhonorably than ihefe words:The kmgs of Mat.ao
the Gentiles and princes bcare rule ouer them , but you fhall not fo? * 5«
And yet he laid no harder lawe vppon his fcruantes than he firft laid ^ "*^'^*'
and receiucd vpon himfelfc. Who (faith he) hath made mc a iudge luc.i 3»
ordiuidcr among you? We fee that he plainelyputteth away from 14.
himfelf the office of iudging,which he would not do if it were a thing
agreingwith his office: will not the feruantcs fuffer thcmfelues to
be brought into that order, whereunto the Lorde hath yclded him-
felfc fubied ? As for the other pointe , I would to God they could
fo proueit in experience as it is eafy tofpeake it. Butforafmuch
as the Apoftles thought it not good , to leauc the worde of God A5t.4»i
and miniftcr attables:thereby, becaufe they will not be taughtjthcy
arc coQuinccd « ihac k it not ail one mans worke to be both a goo4
SSS iiij
Cap. 1 1 . Of the outward mcancs
this IS not only fabulou$,but alfo to be laughed at. But to piffe ouer
!>'ft«5* hjftorie$,Gregory himfelfc is both a fufficient and moft ful witncflVi
J"^*'^ hercof.For io oft as he fpcaketh of y Empcrour,hc callcth him moft
f, j^ * noble Lord, and himfelfc his vnworthy fciuant.Againe in an other
>i. tfi. pIace:But let not our Lord by the earthly power be the fooncr angry
»- J with the prieftcs:but with excellent confidcration,for his fake whofc
J'^ 5' fcruantcs they be, let him fo rule ouer them , that he alfo giue them
?i. ^ 4. *^"* rcuerencc. We fee how in common fubicftion he would be ac-
K.4. compted as one of the people . For he there plcadeih not any other
mans caufc, but his ownc . In an other place , I truft in the almighty
God , that he will giue a longe life to our godly Lordes, and will di-
fpofe vs vndcr your hande accordinge to his mercy. Neither hauc I
therefore allcaged thefe thingcs, for that it is my purpofe throughly
to difcuflc thisqueftion concerning the gift of Conftantincrbut only
that the Readers fhould fe by the way how childifhly the Romaniftcs
do lye , when they go about to chalcnge an earthly Empire to their
Bifhop. And io much the more fowle is the (hamelefneffc of AugU'
ftme Stcuchu? » w in fach a defpeired caufc hath bin fo bolde to ftll
his trauatlc and tongue to the bifhoppe of Rome.Valla(a$ it was not
hard for a man learned and of a (harp wit)had ftrongly confuted that
feble. And yet(as a ma htlc cxercifed in eccJefialhcal matters)he had
not fayd all that might hauc made for that purpofe . Steuchus burft
in^md fcattercd 'linking trifles to opprcffc the clcare hght. And true*
ly he doth nolelFe coldly hadle the caufc of his maifter,than if fomc
mery conceited felow faining himfelfc to do the famc,woaId in dedc
take Vallas parte. But verily it is a worthy caufc, for which the Pope
fliould hyre fuch patroncs for money : and no leflc worthy arc thofc
hyred lofells to be deceiued of their hope of gayne,as it happened to
Eugubinus.
I ^ But if any man require to know the timc,fincc this faincd Em-
pire began to rife vp,thcre are not yet paflcd Hue hudred yeres,fince
the bifhoppes yet remained in fubic(ftion of the PrinccSineither was
(he Pope created without the authority of the Empcrour. The Em-
pcrour Henry the fourth of that name, a light & rafli man,and of no
forcsft.of great boldnes & diflblute lifr,gaue firft occafio to Gregory
the feucnth to alter this order . For when he had in his court the bi-
(hoprikes of al Getmany partly to befold,& pardy laid ope for fpoile:
Hildebrandjwhich had recciucddifpleafurc at his hand,caught hold
of a goodly colour to rcucngc himfelfc . But becaufe he feemed to
purfuc an honcft and a godly caufe, he was furthered with the fauour
of many. And Henry was othcrwifc, by reafon of his infolentmaner
of
To Saliiation. Lib4, 510
ofgouerningjliated of the moft part of Princes. At the length Hilde-
brandjwhich called himfclf Gregory the feuenthjas he was a filthy 8c
naughty man, bewrayed the malice of his hart : which was the caufc
that he was forfakcn of many that haddc conlpired with him. But he
thus much preuailed , that bis (ucceflburs might fnely without pu-
nifhiTJcnt not onely (hake of the yoke, but alfo brmge Empcrours in
fubie^ion to them.Hereunto was added thai from thefc forth there
were many Empcrours likcr to Henry than to luhus Cefarrwhomc it
was no hard thing to fubduc , while they fate at home carelcflc of all
things and flouthfull, when ihey had moft nede with vcrtuc and law-
full meanest© repreire,thegredineffcof thebifhoppcs.Thus we fee
With what colour that fame goodly gjft of Conftannnc is (hadowcH,
whereby the Pope faincth that the Empire of the Weil wasdtliucred
vnto him.
14 In the mcanc time the Popes ceffcd nor,fomtimc with fraude,
fomtimc with trearon>and fomtime with force to inuadc other mens
dominions : and the very city it (elfe, which before was free,wirl]in
a hundred and thirty ycares , or ihtrc about they brought into their
fubiedion : till thev grew to the fame power which they haue at this
dayrand for the obtaining or cncreafmg whereof,they hauc fb trou-
bled Chnftendome by the fpace of two hundred yeares(for they be- r^- \
ganne before ihnt they tooke to them the dominion of the city) that cay. 83
they haue almottdcftroiedit.ln the olde time when vndcr Gtegoric
the keepers ofthe goodes of the Church , did take poflcdion of the
landes w'lich they rcckned to bclo^^ to the Church,& after the ma-
ner of feafing to the vfe ofthe Piincc did fet tirlcs vpon them for to-
ken of claimCyGregory affembling a Councell of billiops, inuevinec
fore againft that prophane maner , asked whether they did nor ludgc
that Gierke accurfed which did of his ownc wil by writing of any mic
attept to enter vpon any poflcffion They all pronounced,accurfcd. !£
to claimc a peecc of ground by writing of a title be in a Gierke an of.
fcnfe worthy of accurfingrwhen whole two hundred yeares together
Popes do praiftifc nothing elfc but battells, fhcdin'g of blood jdcftru-
^ions of armies, (actings of fomc cities,racing of other,oucrthrowc$
ofnationSjWaftinges of kingdomcs,onely that they might catch hold
of other mens poflcfTions : what curfingcs can be enough to punifh
foch examples.Truely itis very plaine that they feekc nothingc IciTc
than the glory of Chrift. For if they of their ownc will do wholly rc-
(ignc all the fecular power that they hnuci therin is no daunger to the
glory of God,no daunger to fbunde dodrine»no daunger to the fafe-
ty of the Ghurch:buc they arc caried blindc and headlong with onlj
Ut
Cap.i I. Of the outward mcancs
gredincflc of dominion : becaufe they chinke nothmgc fafe , vnleflfe
Erc.j4. they may beare rule with rigoroufnc&(a$ the Prophet laith)& with
♦' power.
If To iurifdiftio is annexed immunity ,which the Romifli Clergy
tookc to themfciues.For they thinke it againft their dignity.if they
aunfwere in pcrfonall caufes before a temporal! iudgc: and therein
they thinke both the liberty and dignity of the Church to confitt, if
they be exempt from common iudgementes and lawes. But the oldc
bilhopsjwhich otherwifc were moft rigorous in defending the righc
of the Church,iudged thcmfclues & their order to be nothing hurt,
if they were fubied to the. And the godly Empcrours,without gainc*
faymge of any man,did alway call Clerkes to their ludgemcnt featcf
fo oft a* neede required. For thus faytfi Conftantinc in his Epiftlc to
the Nicomedians:If any of the bifhops {hall vndifcretly diforder him
felfe,his boldneffe (halbe reilraincd by the execution of the mintller
of Go<l,tbat is by my execution. And Valentinia faythrgood bifhopf
do not fpeakc againft jhe power of the Empetour , but do finccrely
both kepc the commaundcmente* of God the great kmge, and alfo
obey our lawes. Ac that time ail men were pcrfwaded of this with*
out controuerlic.But Ecclefiaftical caufes were referred to the iudge-
ment of the Bifhop. As if any Gierke had offended nothingc againft
thclawrsrburonely wasaccufedbythe Canons: he was not cited to
the comon iudgemec fcate,but iny caufc had y bifliop for his iudgc.
LJkcwifc if there were a queflion of Faith in controuerfic , oi fuch a
matter as properly pertained to the Church , the iudgcment thereof
was committed to the Church. So is that to be vnderftandcd,which
Bpiftiji Ambrofe wryteth to Valentinian: Your father of honorable memo*
ry,not onely aunfwered in word,bot alfo decreed by lawes,that in a
caufe of Faith he ought to be iudge that is neither vnfitin office nor
vnlike in right. Againe : If we hauc regard to the Scriptures or oldc
exapIes,who is there that can deny that in a caufe of Faith,in a caufe
(I fay)of Faith , bifhops are wont to rudge of ChriftianEmperours,
and not Empcrours of bifhops.^ Againe ; I would haue come^O Em-
pcrour, to your confiftory, if either the bifhops or the people would
haue fuffred me to go:faying, that the caufc of Faith ought to be de-
bated in the Church before the people . Heaffirmeth verily that a
fpirituall caufe,that is to fay the caufe of rcligio,ought not to be dra^
wen into the temporal! counc where prophane caufes are pleaded,
. . Worthily do all men praife his«6fl;ance in this behalfe. And yet in a
le bafi go*^^d caufe he proceedcth but thus farrc , that if it come to violence
ictrad. and ftrong hand,hc fayth that l>c will giuc placc.Wil|ingly(fay th he)
I
To Saliiation. Lib.4. 511
I will not forfakc the place committed vnto mc : but when I am en-
forced, I know not how to rcfift:for our armour are prayers & tears.
Let vs note the fingular modclly and wifdom of the holy man , ioy-
ncd with ftoutnelTc of courage and boldneilc.Iuftina the Empcrours
mothcrjbecaufc Ihc couldc not draw him to the Arrians hde,pradi-
fed to driue him fro the goucrnment ofthe Church. And fo Ihould
it haiic come to paflcjif he had come when he was called to the pa-
lace to plcadc his caufc.Therefore he denieth the Emperour lo bea
competent iudgc of fo great a controuerfie. Which maner of doingc
both the nccellity of that timc,and the continuall nature of the mat-
ter required. For he iudged that he ought rather to dje,than that fuch
an example fhould by his conicnt be giucn to poftcrity: & yet if vio-
lence be offered, he thinkcth not of reiiftancc. For he denieth u to
be bifhoplikCjto defend the Faith & right of the Church with armcf.
But in other caufes he (heweth himfclfe ready to do whatfoeucr the
Emperour fhall commaunde him. If he demaundc irib.uic,(rayth he)
we denie it not : the landes of tlie Church do pay tnbute.lf he ajke
jandes,he hath power to claime them,nonc of vs rcfiftcth. After the
fame manner alfo fpcaketh Gregory . I am not ignorant ( fayth he) 5^'^»^
of the mindc of our moft noble foueraignc Lorde, that he vfeth not P***^
to cntermcddlc in caufes pcrtainmge to Priettes,lea{t he fhouldc in
any thinge be burdened with our finncs. He doth not generally ex-
clude the Emperour from iudging of Prieftcs:but he fayth that there
be certaine caufesj which he ought to leaue to the judgement of the
Church.
16 And by this very exception the holy men fought nothing elfc,
but that Princes Icfle zealous of religion fnouldc not with tyrannous
violence and wilfulnes interrupt the Church in doing her office. For
neither did they difallow,if Princes fometimc did vfe their authority
in Ecclelialticall matters , fo that it were done to prcferue the order
of the Church,not to trouble it,to ftabliflie difciplinc,not to diOblue
it. For fith the Church hath not the power of compellin'^e,nor ought
to require it(I fpeake of ciuile conftr3ininge:)it is the office of God-
ly kingcs & Princes to maintaine religion with lavvcs,proclamations,
and iudicial proceedings. After this maner,when the Emperour Mau-
rice had commaunded certaine bilhops that they fhould rcceiue their £ j* '
fclow Bifhops that were their neighbours and driucn out by the bar-
barous nations;Grcgory confirmcth that commaundt-mcnt, and ex- Ljb.4,
hortcth them to obeye it . And when he himfelfe is admonifhed by Epi j a.
the fame Emperour to come to atonement with lohn the bifhop of ^ i^
Conftantinople,he doch m decdc render a rcalbn why he ou^ht not
Cap.i2, Of the outward mcanes
to be bIamed:yethc<loth not boaft of immunity fro thcCecuhrcomr,
but rather promifeth that he will be obedient, fo farre as his confci**
cncc will giuc him leauc:and thcrevvichall he fayth this,tliai Maurice
did as became a godly Princej when he gauc fucii commaundeineni*
tothcPriciles.
The xij. Chapter.
of tht difctpline of the (_ hnrih^v vherea/the chief e vfe it in th»
cenfures and exctrnmitnication.
THe difciplincoftlic Church, the entreating whcrof we hauc
difterrcdvnto this place, isbricfcl)' to be declared, that we
may at leneth paffe oucr to the reft . But that fame for the
molt parte hangeth vpon the power of the keyes and fpiritu-
alliurifdidjon.That this may be the more cafily vnderftodc,letvs di-
widc the Church into two principall degrcc5,that is to fay the Cler-
gy, and the people. Clerkes 1 call by the vfuall name ihofe that exe-
cute publikc miniftcry in the Church. Firft we will fpeakc of common
difciplinc, to which all ought to be fubied : then wc will come to the
Clcrgic, which bcfidc that common difcipliac,haiie a fcucraU difcj-
plme by themfelues.But becaufe many for hatred of difcipline daab-
horrc the very name thcrcof,lct them hcare this?If no felowlhip,yca
no houfc though it haue but a fmall houfeholde, can be kept in right
fiate without difciplincjthe fame is much more neceftary in y church,
whofc ftate ought to be moft orderly of all . Therefore as the do-
fifinc of Chrift which bringeth faluation is the foule of the Church,
fo difcipline is in fteede of finewes therein : whereby it is brought to
pafle, that the members of the body hang together cucry one in his
fit pl.\cc.Wherfore whofoeuer do cither defire to haue difciplinc ta-
ken away, or hinder the reftoringe thcreof,whithcrthey do it of fe8
purpofe or by vnaduifednefle, verily they feekc the extreme diflipatio
of the Church. For what (hall betide, if what is luftfull be lawefull to
cucry man?Buc fo would it be,if there were not with the preachingc
ofdodr.ne adioyncd priuateadmonifliments, corrcdions,& fuch o-
thcr helpcs which iuftainc dodrine & fufler it not to be idle. Difci-
pline therefore is as it were a bridle wherewith they may be holdcn
backc and tamed which coltiftily rcfift againft Chrift : or as it were a
pricke,whcrcwith they that are not wiUing enough may be ftirrcd yp:
and fometime , as a fatherly rod , wherewith they which haue more
greuoufly falle may be chaftifed mercifully & according to the milde-
nclFe of the Spiritc of Chrift. Sith therefore wc do nowc fee at handc
ccrtaine bcginninges ofa horrible waftncflein the Church, because
iherc
>a.
To Saluation. Lib.4. .? 512
tliA'C is no care nor order to kccpc the people in awc,vcrv ncccfOcf
crieth out that there is nedc of remedy. But this is the only remedy,
which both Chrift hath commaundcd, & hath alway bin vfcd amog
the godly.
X The firft fundationof difcipline is> that priuate monitions
(hould haue place: that is to fay^that if any man of his ownc accorde
do not his duety ,if he behaue himfelfelicentioufly^or hue not ho-
neftly.or haue committed any thing worthy of blame Jbic ihould fuf-
fcr himfclfe to be admonifhed ; and that euery man (houlde ftudy co
admoni(h his brother whenoccalio ihalrequirc.But (pccially let the
Paftors and Prieftes be watchfull to do this , whofc office is not only
to preach to the people, but in euery houfc to admontlh and exhort
if at any time they do not fufficiently preuaile by gencrall dodrine: as
Paule tcacheth , when he rehearfeth that he taught priuacely and in ^^
houfes , and protefteth that he is cleanc from the blood of all men, }as.&»tf
becaufc he hath not ccaiTed with tearcs day & night to admonifhc
euery one. For dodrinc doth then obtainc force and authority when
the miniftcr not only doth declare to al together what their duety if
to Chriftjbut alfo hath power and order to require the kcping thcrof
of them whom he marketh to be cither not obedient to dodrinc, or
flothfull.Ifany man do either ftubbornly refufe, or m going forward
in his faulteS} do defpife fuch admonifhments:when he hath bin the
fccond lime admonifhcd with witnefTes called to it,Ch>il^ commau-
deth them to be called to the iudgemcnt of the Church,which is the j^^^ ^j
aflcmbly of Elders ; and that there they fhouldc be moregreuoufly i^.snj
admonilbed as it were by publike authority, that if he reuercncc the
Churcii he may fubmit himfclfe & obey.But if he be not hereby fub-
duedjbut do continue in his wickedncs,thcn he commaundeth him,
as a delpifer of the Church,to be put away from the fdowfhip of the
faithfull
J But becaufc he fpcakcth here onely of fecrcte faultes, wc muft
make this diuilion : that Tome Hnnes be priuate, and fome publike or
openly manifcft. Of the firft (orteChriftfayth to euery priuate man, Mac it.
Reprouc him betwene thee and him alone. Of manifell finncs Paule 1 5.
layeth to Timothee, Reprouc him before all men, that the reft may •.Tim.f
haue fcare.For Chrift had faid before,lf thy brother haue offeded a- **•
gainft thee. Which words,(againft thec)vnlefrc thou wilt be conten-
tious, thou canft not ochcrwife vnderftande than vnder thine ownc
fccrete knowledge,fo that there be no moe priuie to it. But the fame
thing which the Apoftle tcacheth Timothee concerning the rebu-
king of (hem openly that (annc openly,hc himfclfs fol»tvcdm Pctcc
Cap.ii. Of the outward mcancs
Gala.i . For when Peter finned cuen co publike ofFence.hc did nocadmohifh
'^* him apart by himfclfc, but brought liira foorth into the fight of the
Church.Therefore this fhalbc the right order of doing,if in fecretc
faulccs we go forward accordmge to thole degrees that Chrifl h.ith
fet:but in manifeft faultes, we immediatly proccedc to the Churches
folcmne rcbuking,if the ofFenfe be pubhke.
4 Let this alfo be an other dilhndion;that of (inncs Ibme be dc-
faultes, other fome be wicked doinges , or hainous offences. To the
correding of this later forc,not only admonilhment or rebuking is to
be v(ed, but alio a feuerc remedy : as Paule Ihewetli which notonely
I. Cor. J chaftifed wit'i wordcs the Corinthian that had committed incc(i,buc
♦• alfo punifhed him with cxcommunicationjf o foone as he was certifi-
ed of his wicked deede.Now therefore we betfinne better to iee hovr
the fpiriiuall iurifdidion of the Church, which puniilieth finnes ac-
coi dsngc to the word of the Loi d,is the bcft maintenance ofhealth,
& funddtion of order,& bonde of vnity. Therfore whe the Church
doth banifhe out of her copany manifeft adulterers,whorcmongcrs,
theeucs,robbers,lcditious perfbns, periured men,falfe witneffcs,and
fuch other,againe,obftinate men,which beinge orderly admonilhed
cuen of fmalT faultes do fcorne God & his iudgcment;{he taketh no-
thinge vpon her felfc without reafon , buiexecuteth the iurifdidion
giuen her of the Lorde. Moreouer , that none Ihoulde defpife fuch
iudgemet of the Church, or lightly regard that he is condemned by
Maci^ theconfenting voices of the faithful:the Lord hath teftifiedjthatthc
19. Qui fame is noth'ing clfe but a pronouncing of his owne fcnience,& that
' *• whadbcucr they do in earth is confirmed in heauen . For they hauc
" ***' the word of the Lord.wherby they may condemnc the froward:they
haue the word, whereby they may rcceiue the repentant into fauour.
They I fay that trult that without this bonde of difcipline Churches
may long ftande, are deceiucd in opinion.'vnleflTc perhappes we may
want tliac hclpe which the Lord forefaw that it (hooidc be ncceffary
for vs. And trucly how ^reat is the neceffity therof,(haIbe better pcr-
ceiued by the manifold vfe of it.
^ 'There be three cndcs which the Church hath refped vnto in
, fuch corrcdions and cxcommunication.The firft is^that they fhoulde
jj nct,to the difhonor of God,be named amongc ChriftianS;that leadc
a filthy & finful life,as though his holy Church were a confpiracy of
C0I0.1. naughty and wicked mcn.For fith the Church is the body of Chrift,
»4- it can not be defiled with fuch filthy & rotten members,but that fbme
fliame muft come to y head.Therefore that there fhould not be any
fuch thing in the Church, wherby his holy name may be fpotted with
any
To Saluation. Lib4. 515
any rcprocKthcy arc to be driue out of her houlhoIcI,by whofc dif-
honcftyany (claunder might redounde to the name of Chriftians.
And herein alfo is confidcratio to be had of the Supper of the Lord,
that it be not profaned with giuingc it to all without choife. For it is
nioft true > that he to whom the diftribution of it is committed, if he
wittingly & willingly admit an vnworthy man whom he might law-
fully put backe, is as gilty of Sacrilege , as if he did giuc abroade the „ .. "
Lords bo^y to dogges. VV hcrefore Chry foftomc greuouily inueyeth j^ j^^^
againft the Pricftes,which while they f?are the power of great men, j.
dare debarre no man. The blood (fayth he)(halbe required at your Eze-4'
handes. Ifyefeareman.heflialllaughyoutofcorne.'butifyefearc '^-^ ^^
God.ye (halbc reuerenced alfo among mcn.Lct vs not feare maces, ^^'
nor purple, nor crownes : wc haue here a greater power.l verily will
rather dehuer mine ownc body to death , and fufter my blood to be
(hedjthan I will be made partaker of this defilinge . Therefore Icaft
this moft holy myftery be fpotted with fclaunderjin the diftributingc
the rof choife is greatly rcquifite:which yet ca not be had but by the
iurifdidion of the Church. The fecond ende is,lcaft(as it is wont to ^^
come topaffe ) with the continuall company of the euill ,thc good
fhould be corrupted. For(fuch is our rcdy inclination to go out of the
way) there is nothing eafier than for vs to be ledde by euill examples
from the right courfeof life. This vfc the Apoftlc touchcd,when he
comaunded the Corinthians to put the inceftuous man out of their
company. A litle leuen(faith he)corruptcth the whole lumpc of doae. i.Cor. j
And he forefawe herein fo great daunger, that he forbade him euen tf.& x u
from all fclowlhip.Ifany brother(fayth he)amongyou be named ei-
ther a whoremonger, or a couetous man, or a worfhipper of Idoles,
or a dronkarde , or an euill fpeakcri with fuch a one I graunt you not
ieaue (b much as to eate . The thirde ende is , that they rhemfelues '^
confounded with (hame may beginnc to repent of their Hlthineflc. /
So it is profitable for them alfo, to haue their ownc wickednes cha-
fiired>that with feeling of the rod they may be awaked, which other-
wife by tender bearing with the would haue become more obftinatc.
The fame thing doth the Apoftlc meane whe he faith thus.If any do i.TheC
not obey our dodrine,marke him, and kepe no company with him, 3.14*
that he may be afhamed. Againc in an other place,when he writeth
that he hath deliuercd the Corinthian to Sathan, that his Spirite i.Cor.j
might be faued in the day of the Lord:that is(as I expound it)that he 5*
went into a damnation for a time , that he might be faued for euer. ^"8-"*
But he therefore fayth that he dehuereth him to Sathan, becaufe the p^ft.'
dcuill is out of the Church , as Cbrift is in the Church. For whereas hom.)l
TTT
Cap.i 2. Of the outward meanes
fome do referre it to a certaine vcxinge of the flefli, I thinkc tharto
be very vncertaine.
6 When thefc cndes be fct foorth , now it remaincth to fee how
the Church executeth this part of difcipiine which confiftcth in iu-
rifdidion. Firft let vs kepe the diuifion aboue fet, that of (jnncs fomc
be publike, and other fome be priuate or more fccretc . Pubhkc arc
thofe that haue not only one or two witnefTcs^butare committed o-
penly & with the ofJenfc of the whole Church.Sccrct I call thofe,nof
which are altogether hidden from men , as arc the (innes of Hypo-
criteSjfor thofe come not into the iudgemet of the Church,but thofc
of the meane kinde which arc not without witncfles, and yet are not
publike.Thc firft kinde requireth not thofe degrees which Chrift re-
hearfeth:butwhen any fuch thing appearcth,thc Church ought to do
her duty in calling the finncr & correding him according to the pro-
portion of the offenfe. In the feconde kinde according to the rule of
Chrift , they come not to the Church till there be alfo obftinacy ad->
ded. When it is once come to knowledge,tben is that other diui(i6 to
be noted betwcne wicked doinges and defaultes.For m lighter finnes
there is not lobe yfcd (o great feuerity,bui chaftiicment of words fuf-
ficcth,& the fame gentle & fatherly, which may not harden nor con-
found the iinnerjbut bring him home to himfetfe.that he may more
reioyce rha be fory that he was correded.But it is mete that hainous
ofTenfes be chaftifed with (harper remedy. For it is not enough, if he
that by doing wicked dede of cuill example hath greuouOy oftended
the Church,{hould be chaftifed only with words,but he ought for a
time to be depriued of the communion of the Supper,til he haue gi-
i.Cor.y *^c" affurance of his repentance.For againft the Corinthian Paule v-
5. feth not only rebuking of words,but driueth him out of the Church,
and blameth the Corinthians that it had fo long borne him. The old
and better Church kept this order,whenrightfull gouernment flori-
fhed.For if any man had done any wicked dede whereupon was^ro-
wen offenfe, firft he was commaunded to abftainc from partaking of
the holy Supper,then both to humble himfelfe before God,& to le*!-
ftifie his repentance before the Church.There were alio certaine fb-
lemne vfagcs5which were enioyncd to them that had fallen, to be to-
Epifia. kens of their repentance. When they had fb done, that the Chtwch
Lib. I. was fatisfied» the by laying on of hands he was receiucd into fauour.
lib. 3. Which recciuing is oftctimes called of Ciprian peace,who alfo brief- ,
^P* '4 ly defcribeth this vfage. They do peqance(faych he)in a certaine full
* ' time;thcn they come to confeflion,& by the laying on of handcs of
the btftiop & the Clergy (hey rccciue power to come to the commu-
nion.
To Saluation. Lib.4. 514
flion. Howbcit the bilhop & his clergy had Co the ruling of reconci'
liacion, that they did therewithal! require the confcnc ot the people:
as he (hewcth in an other pi jce.
7 From this difcipline there was no man exempted, that euen the
Princes together with the common people did fubmit thcmftlues to
beare it. And rightfully, (tth it was euidet that it was the difcipline of
Chriftjto whom it is mete that all fceptcrs and crownes of kingcs be
fubmitted.So whcnThcodofius was depriued by Ambiofe of power Ambro
to come to the communion becaufeofthe flaughter committed at ""'^b. i.
Thcflalonica,he threw downe all the royall ornament wherewith he ^^ '
was clothed : he openly in the Church bewailed his finne, which had habiu
crept vpon him by fraude of other men:he craued pardon with gro- in func
ning & tearcs. For great kings ought not to thinke this to be any dif- Th. o
honor to them^if they humbly throw downe chefelues before Ch.ift ^"^i*
the king of kings,neithcr ought it to difpJeafe the that they be judged
by the Church. For filh in their court they hearc nothinge eJle but
mere fljitteries,it is more than necefFary for the to be rebuked of the
Lorde by the mouth of the Prieftes . But rather they ought to wi{h)
that the Prieftes fhould not fpare them,that the Lord m.iy fpare the*
In this place 1 omit to fpeake, by whom this lUTifdidio is to be excr-
cifedjbccaufe it is fpoken of in an other place. This onely I adde that
that IS the lawful maner of proceedmg in excommunicaiinge a man^
which Paul (heweth.if the Elders do it not alone by themfcluesjbuc
with the Church knowing and allowing it:that i$,in fuch fort that the
multitude of the people may not gouerne the doinge,but may mai ke
it as a witnes & a kcper that nothing fhould be done of a few by wil-
full affcdion But the whole maner of doing, befide the calling vppon
the name of God , ought to haue fuch grauity, as may refemble the
prefence of Chrift : that it may be vndouted that he there fitteth for
ruler of his owne iudgemcnt.
8 But this ought not to be palTed ouer,thit fuch feuerity becom-
ifteth the Church as is ioined with y Spirit of miidcnes. For we muft
alway diligently beware(as Paul teacheth)that he which is punilhcd j.Cer.
be not fwallowed vp of forrowe: for fo fhoulde of a remedy be made 7»
a deftrudion But out of the end may better be gathered a rule of mo-
deration. For whereas this is required in excommunication thatthe
finner (hould be brought to reperttancc,& euill examples take away,
leaft either the name of Chrift {hould be euill fpoke of, or other men
be prouoked to folow themtif we (hall haue an eie to thefe things, we
(halbe able eafily to iudge how far feuerity ought to procede & where
it ought to end. Therefore when the linncr giueth a teftimony of his
TTT ij
Cap.i2, Of the outward mcancs
repentace,& doth by his tcftimonY,as much as in him lic{h,blot out
the ofFenfc : he is not to be enforced any further ;bat if he be cnfor-
ccd,rigoroufncfle doth then cxceedc meafure.In which bchalfe the
immcafurable feuerity of the olde fathers can not be excufed, which
both difagreed from the prefcnbed order of the Lord , and alfo was
maruelofly dangerous. For whe they charged a finner with folemne
penance,& depriuation fro the holy communion fomtimc for fcuen
yeres,fometime foure yeres,(bmetime three yeres/omtimc for their
whole life:what other thing could folow thereof but cither great hi-
pocrifie or raoft great defperation? Likewife wheras no man that had
fallen the feconde time was admitted to feconde penance but was caft
out of the Church euen to the end of his life; that was neither profi-
table nor agreeing to rcafon.Therforc whofoeuer fhal wey the mat-
, ter with found iudgementjfhall herein perceiue want of iheir difcrc-
Epift ?i tion.Howbeit I do here rather difallow the publike maner,tha accufc
Lib.i, all them that vfed it , whereas it is certaine that many of the nufliked
ii;but they did therefore fufFer it,becaufe they coulde not amend it.
Truely Ciprian declareth,how much befide his owne will he was fo
rigorous.Ourpacience(fayth he) and eafines andgentlenes isredy
to the that come. I wifh all to returne into the Church:! wifh all our
felowfoldiars to be enclofed within the tcntes of Chrift and in the
houfcs of God y father. I forgiue al things,! diflemble many thingos:
for zeale and defire to gather brotherhoode together,! examine not
with full Judgement thofe things that are committed againft God.in
pardoninge defaultes more than ! ought, I am my felfe almolt in de-
fault : I do with ready and full loue embrace them that returne with
repentance,cofefling their finnes with humble & plaine fatisfaiflion,
Chryfoftome is fomwhat harder, and yet he fayth thus:!f God be fo
kinde,why wil his Prieft feme fo rigorous? Morcouer we know what
gentleneffe Auguftine vfed toward the Dooatiftes,infomuch that he
ftjckcd not to receiue into bifhoprikc thofe that had returned from
fchifmejCuen immediatly after their repentance. But becaufc a con-
trary order had growen in fqrce , they were compelled to leaue their
owne iudgement to folow it.
9 But as this mildnes is required in the whole body ofthe churchj^jr
that it Ihoulde puniQie them that are fallen, mercifully & not to the
extremity of rigor,but rather according to the precept of Paul,fhould
confirme charity toward the: fo euery priuate man for himfelf ought
to temper himfelfe to this mercifulneflc & gentlencs. Therefore it is
not our part to wipe out ofthe number ofthe eledt fuch as are driuen
out ofthe Churchjor to dcfpcire of them as chough they were alrea-
dy
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 515
dy loft.Wc may in dedc iudge them ftraungcrs from the Church, &
therefore grangers from Chrift:but that is only during the time that
they abide in diuorce. But if then alfo they fhewc a greater rcfcm-
blancc of (tubbornnes than of gcntlenes , yet let vs commit them to
the iudgcment of the Lord, hopinge better of them in time to come
than we fee in time prefent,and let vs not therefore ccaffe to pray to
God for thcm,&(to comprchende all in one worde) let vs not con*
dcmne to death the pcrfon it felfe,which is in the hand & ludgemec
of God alone , but let vs rather wcie by the law of the Lord of what
fort cucry mans workes be. Which rule while we folowe, we rather
ftand to the iudgemet of God than pronounce our owne.Let vs not
take to our felues more hberty in iudginge , vnlefle we will binde the
power of God withinbounde$,& appoint a law to his mercy ,at whofc
pleafurc when he thinketh it good , very euill me are turned into ve-
ry good, ftraungcrs are graffed & foreins are chofcn into the church.
And this the Lord doth , thereby to mocke out the opinion of men,
• & rebate their rafhneffe : which if it be not reftraineiprefumeth to ^
take to it felfe power of judging more than it ought.
10 For where as Chrift promifeth that that ihalbe bound in hca- ^t,it
uen, which they that be his {hall binde in earth, he Hmiteth the po- * '•
wer of bindinge, to the Cenfure of the Church : by which they that
are excommunicate are not throwen into cucrlaftinge ruine & dam-
nation:but hearing their Hues & maners to be condemned, they arc
•Ifo certified of their owne euerlaflinge condcmnation,vnlc(re they
repent. For excommunication herein differcth from accur(inge,thac
accurfing taking away al pardon doth condemnc a man and adiudge
him to eternall deftrudion.-excommunication rather rcuengeth and
puniftieth maners. And though the fame do alfo punifli the man,yet
it doth fopunifhhim, that in forewarning him of his damnation to
come , it doth call him backe to faluation. If that be obtayned, re-
conciliation and reftoringe to the communion is ready . But accur-
fingeis either very feldomc orneuerin vfe. Therefore although ec-
clefiafticall difcipline , permitteth not toliue familiarly, ortohauc
frcdly conuerfation with them that be excommunicate:yet we ought
to endeuour by fuch meanes as we may,that returninge to amende-
inent, they may returne to the felofhip & vnity of theChurchias the
Apoftle alfo tcachcth. Do not (faith he) thinke them as enemies,but
corrcd them as brethren. Vnlefle this gentlenes be kept as well pri- **7^®*'
uately as in comraon,therc is daungcr leaft from difciplinc we forth-
with fall to butchery.
X I This alfo is principally required to f moderation of difciplinc,
TTT iij
ib.l.
^ap.i 2. ^r tnc ourwaramcancs
which Auguftinc cntrcatcth of in difpuiinge againft the Donatives;
^ that neither priuate me,if they Tee faults not dihgently enough cor-
reded by the Counccll of Elders.lliould therefore byandby dcparte
from the Church:nor the Paflors themfelues, if they can not accor«
ding to cheir harccs defire purge all thingcs thatnedc amendment,
fhoulde therefore throw away the miniftery,or with vnwontedrigo^
onrra ^o"'"^* trouble the whole Church. For it is mott true which he wry-
aim, tethrthat he is free & difchargedfrom curfcgwhofocucr he be that ei-
ap.i, ther by rebuking amendeth what hp can.or what he can not amend,
cxdudethjfauing the bond of peace i or what he can notexclude,fa-
uing the bond of peace,he doth difalow with equity ,and bcare with
Jb.j. ftedfaftnefle. He rendreth a reafon thereof in an other place: becaufc
*P''* all godly order and manner of ecclefiafticall difcipline ought alway to
haue refpcd^ vnro the vnity of the Spirit in the bond of peace : which
the ApoiUe commaundeth to be kept by our bearing one with an o-
ther:and when it i> not kept.the medicine of pqni(hment beginneth
to be not only rjpeiflaous, but aifo hurtfull, & therefore ceaflethto
-ap. I. jjg ^ medicine. He that (faith he) doth dihgently thinke vpon thefc
things doth neither in preferuinge of vnity negled the feuerity of di-
fcipline , nor doth with immcafurablenelre of corre^ton breake the
bonde of felo fillip. He graunteth «n dede that not only the Paftours
ought to trauaill to this point, that there may remaine no fault in thp
Church,but alfo y euery man ought to his power to endeuour therc-
Cap.i. umo:& he plainely declareth that he which ncgledcth to monifhjrc
buke, & corred the euill, although he do not fauour ihcm,nor finne
with thc,yet is gilty before the Lord. But if he be in fuch degrecthat;
he may alfo fcuere them from the partaking of facramentes, and doth
it not,now he finneih not by an others euill,but by his own.Only he
Wat.f |, willcth it to be donc,with vfing of discretion, which the Lord alfo re
»^- quircth , leaft while the tares be in rootingc out , the corne be hurt.
Hereupon he gatbereth out of Ciprian) Let a man therefore merci-
fully corred what he can:3c what he can not, let him patienly fufier,
and with loue grone and lament it.
12 This he faiih becaufe of the prccifcnes of the Donatiftes.who
when they faw faultes in the Churches which the bifhops did in dede
rebuke with wordes, but not puniftie with excommunication, (bcf
caufe they thought that they coulde this way nothinge preuaile)did
ftiarply inuey againft the bifhops as betraiers of difcipline,& did with
an vngodly fchifmc dcuide themfelues from the flockc of Chrift. As
the Anabaptiftes do at this day > which when they acknowledge no
congregation to be of Cbrifi , vnlcflc it do in eucry point (bine with
angclike
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 51^
angclike pcrfcdion,do vnder pretcnfe of their zcalc oucrthrowe all
edification. Such(raith Auguftinc)not for hatred of others mes wic-
kednes,but for deiirc to maintaine their own contentions, do couec
cither wholly to drawe away, or at Icaft to diuide the weakc people
Ihared with the boafting of their namerthey fwelling with pride,madl
vith flubbornes, traiterous with fclaundersjtroublefome with fedi-
uons,lea(l it (hould opely appeare that they want the light of trueth»
do pretend a fhadow of rigorous feuerity:& thofe thingcs which in
fcripturc are commauded to be done with moderate healing for cor«
reding of the faults of brethren, preferuing the (incerenes of loue,&
keping the vnity of peace.they abufe to facrilege of fchifme & occa-
fion of cutting of So doth Satan transforme himfelfc into an angell j^ q^^^
of light, when by occafi5 as it were of iuft feuerity he perfuadeih vn- ti.i4«
incrcifull cruelty ,coucting nothingc elfe but to corrupt & breake the
bond of peace &vnity:which bond remaining faftjamongChnftians
all his foes are made weake to hurt , his trappes of treafons are bro-
ken,and his councels of ouerthrowing do vanifli away.
1 J This one thing he chiefly comcndeth, that if the infe(flion of
finne haue cntred into the whole multitude , then the feucre mer-
cy of huely difcipline is necc{rary.For(faithhe)the dcuifes of repara-
tion are vaine,& hurtful & ful of facrilcge,becaufe they are vngodly
& proud,& do more trouble the weake good ones,than they amend
the ftout euill ones. And that which he there teacheth other,he hinj
felfe alfo faithfully folowed. For writing to Aurelius bifhop of Car-
thage he coplaincth that dronkennes which is fo fore condemned in
fcripturesjdoch range vnpunifhed in AfFrica:& he aduifcth him, that
affembling a Councel of bifhops he (hould prouide remedy for it. He
addeth byandby after; Thefe thingcs (as I thinke)are taken away not
roughly, not hardly, not after an imperious maner,but more by tea-
ching tha by c6maunding,more by admonilhing than by thretning.
For fo muft we deale with a multitude of finners,but feuerity is to be
exercifed vpo the finnes of few. Yet he doth not meanc that Bilhops
(hould therfore winke or hold their peace at publikc faultes, becaufc i^j|, ,
they can not feuercly punifh ihemras he himfelfe afterward expoun- contra
deth it. But he wiUeth that the meafure of corredio be fo tempered, parm.
that fo farre as may be,it may rather bring health than deftrudlion to "p.«.
the body. And therfore at length hccocludeth thus?Whcrforc both '•^°'^«$
this comaundemcnt of the Apoftle is in no wife to be neglefted , to Ephe.^
feuer the cuil,whe it may be done without peril of breaking of peace: s,
& xhis is alfo to be kept, that bearing one with an other.wc Oioulde
«ndcuour toprcfcruc vnity of the Spirit,in the bonde of peace.
TTT iiij
Cap. 1 2 . Of the outward mcancs
14 The parte that remaincth of difcipline , which properly is not
coniained in the power of keies, ftandeth in this, that accordingc to
the ncceffity of times the Paftors fhoulde exhort the people either
to faftingjor to common fuppiicatios, or to other exercifes of humi-
lity,repentancc,and faith,of which thmges there is neither time,nor
meafure^nor forme prefcnbed by y word of God,but is left iny iudge-
inct of the Church.The obferuing of this part alfojas it is profitable,
fo hath alway bin vfed of the old church cuen fro the very Apoftlef .
Howbeit the ApolUes themfclues were not the firft authors of them,
but ihcy tooke example out of the law & the Prophctes. For we fee
that there fo oft as any weighty bufineffe happened , the people was
called togetner,common praiers enioyned, & fafting commaunded.
Therefore the Apoftles folowed that which both was not new to the
people of God,& they forelaw that it fhould be profitable.Likewife is
to be thought of other exercifes,wherewith the people may either be:
ftirred vp to their duety,or be kept in awe and obedience.Therc arc
examples eche where in holy hiftories, which we nede not to gather
together.In fumme this is to be holde,that fo oft as there happeneth
any controuerfie of religion , which muft be determined either by a
Synode or by ecclefialhcal iudgement,fo oft as they be about choo-
fingof a minifter,finally fo oft as any hard matter or of great impor-
tance is in doingeragaine when there appeare tokens of the wrath of
God,as peftilence,& warre, & famine:this is a holy ordinace & pro-
fiiable for all ages,thatthe Paftors fhoulde exhort the people to c6-
mon fafting,& to extraordinary praiers. If any man do not allow the
teftimonies which may be alleaged out of y old teftament,as though
they were not mete for the Chriftian Church, it is certaine that the
Apoftles alfo did the fame . Howebeit o£ praiers I thinke there will
fcarceJy any be found that will mouc any queftion,Therfore let vs fay
fomwhat of fafting : becaufe many when they vnderftande not what
profit it hathjdo iudge it riot fo neceffary.'fome alfo do vitcrly refufc
it as fuperfluous:& when the vfe of it is not well knowen, it is eafie to
flide into fuperftition.
1 5r Holy & true fiftinge hath three endes. For wc vfe it,either tc^
make leane and fubduc the fleih, that it (hould not waxe wanton,or
that wc may be better difpofed to praiers & holy meditatios> or that
it ftiouldc be a teftimony of our humblinge before God,when we be
willing to confefle our giltines before him. The firft end hath not Co
often place in comon fafting, becaufe all men haue not like eftate of
body,nor like health-.therefore it rather agreeth w priuatc fafting.The
iecond end is comon to bocb/or as well the whole Church as euery
one
To Saluation. Lib.4. 517
one of the faithful! hath nccde of fuch preparation to prayer. The
thirdc alfo is likcwifc common.For it ihall fometime befall that God
ftiall llrikc fome nation with warre, or peftilence, or with fome ca-
lamitie. In fuch a common fcourge the whole people muftaccufe
themfelueSjand openly confcffe their owne gtltinefTcButif the hand
of the Lorde do ftrikc any priuate man , he ought to do the fame,
cither alone , or with his owne familic. That ftandeth chiefly in the
afFedion of the minde. But when the minde is affeded as it ought
to be, it is fcarcely pofTible , but that it will brcakc out into outward
teftifying : and then chiefely if it turnc to common edifying, that al-
Cogether in openly confefling their finne {houldc yeldc praife'of
righteoufnefle to God , and euery one mutually exhorte other with
their example.
16 Wherefore fafting , as it is a figne of humbling , hath more
often vfe publikely, than among priuate men, howfoeuer it be com-
mon,as is already faid. Therefore as touching the difcipline whereof
we nowc entreate : fo oft as we muft make fupplication to God for
any great matter , it were expedient to commaunde fafting together
with prayer. So when the Antiochians laidehandes vponPaule and ^" ''
Barnabas,that they might the better comcdc to God their miniftery ^'^ ^
which was of fo great importance , they Joined Tafting with prayer, jj,*
So both they afterward , when they made minifters ouer Churches,
were wont to pray with fafting. In this kinde of fafting they had re-
garde to none other thing,butthat they might be made frefher and
more vncombredtopray. Verily this we finde by experience , that
when the belly is full^the minde is not fo lifted vp to God,that it can
both with harty & feruet aftedion be caried to prayetjand continue
in it.So is that to be vnderftood which Luke rcherfeth of Anne,that Luk a
{he ferued the Lorde in faftinges and prayers. For he doth not fet 37»
the wor(hipping of God in fafting:but fignifieth that the holy woma
did after that maner exercife her felfe to cotinuance of prayer. Such
was the fafting of Nehemias when he did with carneftly bent 2ele Nehe.i
pray to God for the deliuerance of his people. For this caufe Paule 4*
faith that the faithfull do well , if they abfteine for a time from their **^®''
wedding bed,that they may the more freely apply prayer and fafting. ^'^
Where ioining fafting to prayer in ftecde of a helpe , he puttcth v«
in minde that it is of no value but fofarre as it is referred to this
cnde. Againe when in the fame place he geueth a rule to maryed
folke$,that they ftiould mutually render good will one to an other, it
is plaine that he doth not fpeakc of daily praycrs^buc of fuch praycrf
9i require a more eaineft iaccnciucneffe.
/
Cap. 1 2. Of the outward meanes
17 Againe, if cither peftilence, or famine) or warrc beginne to
range abrode, or i( any caiamitie otherwifc feeme to hang ouer any
contrcc and people : then alfo it is the duetic of Paftors to exhort
ihe Church tofafting, that they may humbly befechc the Lordc to
turne away his wrath For he geueth warning that he is prepared and
in a maner armed to reuenge,when he maketh any dager to appere.
Therfbrc as accufed men in time paft with long hanging beard,with
?ncombed heare,with blacke aray,were wont humbly to abace them.
felues , to procure the mercie of the iudge : fo when we are accufed
before the iudgcment feate of God, it behoueth both for his glorie,
and for common edification) and alfo is profitable and healch&U for
vs. that we ihould in piteous array crauc to efcape his fcueritie. And
thatthis was vfed among the peopleof Ifraelljitiseafy to gather by
ae\.u the wordesof loel. For when he commaundeth a trompcttobe
i' founded , the congregation to be gathered together , fafting to be
appointed , and the reft that followe : he fpeaketh of things receiued
in common cudome. He had a little before faid , that examination is
appointed of the wicked deedes of the people,and had declared that
the day of iudgement was no we at hand, and had fummoned them
being accufed to pleade their caulc : then he cricth out that they
(hould haft to fackc cloth and afhes , to weping and fafting : thatis,
that they (hould alfo with outward teftifyings throwe themfclues
downe before the Lorde. Sacke cloth and aihesparaduencure did
more agree with thole times : but there is no dout that the caUing
together, and weping and fafting and fuch like do like wife perteine
alfo to our age , fo oh as the ftate of our things doth fo require. For
(ith is a holy exercife,both to humble men,and to confeffe humility,
why (hould we lefle ?fe it than the olde people did in like neceflitie?
.SiiB. We reade that not oncly the people of Ifraell, which were informed
• ^' * and inftruftcd by the word of God, but alfo the Niniuites which had
Km u "^ doctrine but the preaching of lonas , fafted in token of forowe,
i. * * What caufe is there therefore why we (hould not do the fame? But it
oiuj.j is an outward ceremonie) which was with the reft ended inChrift.
Yea rather euen at this day it is , as it alway hath bene , a very good
helpe to the faithfull,and a profitable admonition, to ftirre vp them
felucSjthat they ftiould not with to great carclefneflc and fluggiftines
more & more prouokc God whe they are chaftifcd with his fcourges*
^j„ - Therefore Chrift when he excufech his Apoftles for that they faft
5. not , doth not fay that faftinge is abrogate : but he appointeth it to
ukcj. times of caiamitie, & ioineih it with mourning. The time (hall come
4- (faith he) when the bridegromc ftiall be taken away from them.
To Valuation. Lib.4. 515
18 But that there (hould be no crroi in the name , let vs define
what fafting is. For wc do not here vnderftand by it oncly abthnencc
andfparing in meate and dnnke,but a certaine other thing. The life
of thegodiy ought in dccdc to be tempered with honeft Iparing and
fobricue^that fo npre as ts poffible it may in the whole courfe therof
bearca certaine refemblancc of fafting. But befide this there is an
other faftmg for a time,whc wc wiihdrawe any thing of our wonted
diejc , cither for one day or for a certaine time , and do charge our
felucs with a ftreightcr and feuercr abftinence in diet than ordinaric.
This confifteth in three things, in time, in quahtie of meates, and in
(mailnes of quaiitie.I meane by time.that we {hould vfe ihofe doings
fafting , for which fafting is ordcincd. As for example,if a man faft
for common prayer : that he come cmptie ynto it.Quahiie ftandcth
in this, that ail deintinefle ftiould be abfent , and being content with
common and bafer meatcs,wc (hould not ftirre vp appetite with dc-
iicates. The rulc^f quantitie is in this , that we eate more Sparingly
andleiTe than we be wont, oncly for neccllicie, and not alfo for
pleafure.
19 But wc muft alway principally beware , that no fuperftition
crepe vponys , as it hath heretofore happened to the great hurt of
the Church. For it were much better that there were no vfe at all of
faftingjthan that it (hould be diligently kepre,and in the meane time
be corrupted with falfe and hurtful! opinions,whereunio the world
fomctirae falleth , vnlefle the Paftors do with great faithfulnelfe and
wifdome prcuer«it.Thefiift point therfore is,that they fhould alway
enforce that which loci tcacl\eth, that they (hould cutt their hartes loet.s*
and not their garmentes:that is,that they (hould admoniili the pco« 1 3.
ple,that God doth not gccatly efteeme fafting of it felfe,vnlefle there
be an inwarde aflfedion of the harte, a true mjfliking oiCmnc and of
himfelfctrue humbling, and true forowe through the feare of God;
yea that fafting is profitable for no other caufe,but for that it is ioined
to thefe as an inferior helpe. For God abhorreth nothing more
than when men in fctting (igncs and an outward fticwc infteedcof
innocence of hart , do labor with falfe color to deceue themfeiues.
Therefore Efaie moft (harply inucyeth againft this hypocri(ie , that Bfj, ef,
the lewes thought that they had fatisficd God, when they had onely 5.
faftedjhowfoeucr they did nori(h vngodlineiTc & vncleanc thoughts
in their hart.Is it (faith he) fuch a faftmg which the Lord requireth?
and lo forth as foiloweth. Therefore the hypocriticall fafting is not
onely an vnprofitableandfuperfluous weryingjbutalfoagreatabho-
ipipation. An other eueli necrc vnto this is chiefly to be taken hcde
Cap.i2. Of the outwarde mcancs
of, that it be not taken for a meritorious workc , or a forme of wor*
(hipping God.For fith it is a thing of it fcife indifFercnt,an(l hath no
value but by reafon of thofe cndes which it ought tohaue rcfpe^
vnto.it is a moft hurtful! (upcrftition,to cofounde it with the workcs
commaundcd of God and neceflarieof thcmfclucs without other
refped. Such was in oldc time the dotage of the Manichecs : whom
Libr. i. when Auguftinc c6futeth,he doth plamly enough reach, that fafting
demor. jj jo be iudged by no other endcs than thofe which I hauc fpokcn
cap* n- ^^' ^"*^ '^ "^ otherwife allowed of God , vnleffe it be referred to the
andlib. famc.The thirde error is in deede not fo vngodly ,yetitis pcrillous:
ao. con to require the keping of it more precifely and rigoroufly as it were
traFau. one of the chiefe dueties,and fo to aduance it with immeafurablc
praifes, that men fliould thinke they hauc done fome excellent thing
when they haue fafted.In v/hich behalfe I dare not altogether excufc
the olde fathers,but that rhey haue fowed fome fcedes of fuperftino,
and geuen occafion to the tyranny which hath rifcn fins. There are
foundein deede fomciimes in them foundeand wife fentcnces , of
fafting, but afterwarde we nowe and then mete with immeafurablc
praifes of fafting which aduaunce it among the chiefe vcrtues.
lo And at that time the fuperftitious obferuing of lent was eche
where growen in vfc : becaufe both the commo people thought that
they did therin Tome notable feruice to God , and the Paftors did
Mac*, commend it for a holy following of Chrift : whereas it is plaine,that
a* Chrift did not faft to prefcribe an example to other , but thatm fo
beginning the prechingof theGofpel,hc might in very deede proue
that it was not a dodrine of men,but defcended from heaucn. And
it is meruailous , that fo grofte an error , which is confuted with fo
many & fo cuident reafons,could crepe into men of fo fharpe iudge-
ment.For Chrift did not faft oft (which he muft ncedcs haue done if
he would haue fct forth a lawcofyerely fafting) but onelyones
when he prepared himfelfe to the pubhfhingof the Gofpcll.And he
fafted not after the maner of mcnne , as it was mete that he ftiould
haue done if he would hauc prouoked men to foUowe him:but ra*
ther he flicwcth an example , whereby he may rather drawe men to
wonder at him than ftirre them vp to followe him. Finally there is
none other caufc of this fafting, than of that which Mofes fafted
when he receiued the law at the hand of the Lord. For fith thatmi-
Exo.a4. racie was flicwcd in Mofes to ftablifh the authoritic of the lawe , it
1 8 and ought not tohaue bene omitted in Chrift, leatt the Gofpell fliould
34«a8. fecmc to geue place to the lawe. But fince that time it neuer came in
any mans mindc vndcr color of following of Mofes to require fuch a
forme
To Saluation. Lib,4. 519
forme of fading in the people of Ifrael. Neither did any of the holy
Prophets and fathers follow it , when yet they had minde and zealc
enough to godly exercifcs. For , that which is faid of Hclias, that he » Kingi
palled forty daycs without mearc and drinke , tended to no other *^ *•
cndc but that the people (hould knowe that he was ftirred vp to be
a rcftorcr of the lawe from which almoft all Ifraell had departed.
Therefore it was a mere wrongfull zcale and full of fuperftttion^that
they did fet forth fading with the tide and color of following of
Chrift . Howbeit in the maner of fading there was then great di-
uer(ity>as Cadiodorus rehearfeth out of Socrates in the ninth booke
of his hidorie . For the Romaines (faith he) had but three weekcs,
but in thefe there was a continual! fading.cxcept on the Sonday and
Saturday. The Slauonians and Grecians had (ix weekes : other had
feuen: but their fading was by dcuided times. And they disagreed
no ledc in difference ofmcates. Some dideacc nothing but bread
and water : fomc added herbes: fome did not forbeare fidie and
fowles : fummc had no difference in meates. Of this diuerfitie Au-
gudine alfo maketh mention in the latter Epidle to lanuarie.
2 1 Then followed worfc times, and to the prepoderous zcle of
the people was added both ignorance and rudcnede of the Bifhops,
and a ludc to bcare rule , and a tyrannous rigor. There were made
wicked lawesjwhich draine cofciences with pernicious bondes. The
eating offlefhe was forbidden, as though it defiled a man. There
wei% added opinions full of facrilege one vppon an other , till they
came to the boitome of all errors. And that no perucrfenelTc fliould
be omitted, they began with a mod fondc pretence of abdinence to
mockc with God. For in the mod exquiiite dcintinefTe of fare is
fought thepraife of fading: no delicates do then fuflice, there is
ncuer greater plentie,or diuerfitie, or fweetenefTc ofmcates. In fuch
and fo gorgious preparacio they thinke that they feruc God rightly.
I fpeake not howe they ncuer more fowly glutte thcm(elues,than
when they would be compted mod holy men.BrefcIy , they compt it
the greated worfhippingof God to abdeine from flefh, and (ihcfe
cxccpted)to flowe full of all kinde of dcintics.On the other fide they
thinke this the extrcmed vn^odlineffe , and fuch as fcarcely may be
recompenfcd with death,if a man tad ncuer fo litde a piece of bacon
or vnfaucry fledi with brownc breade.Hierome tellcth , that cucn in AdNe
his time were fome that with fuch follies did mocke with God:which potian
becaufe they would not caie oyle , caufed mod deintie meates from
cuery place to be brought them: yea to oppreffe nature with vio-
lence , chey abftcincd from drinking of water , but caufed fwece and
Cap.i2. Of the outwardc mcancs
coiily fuppinges to be made for theni,which they did not drinkc 6a}
of a cup, but out of a (hell. Which faultc was then in a fewe , at this
day it is a common faulce among all riche menne,that they fad to no
other ende but that they may banket more fumptuoufly & deintily.
But 1 wil not wafte many wordes in a matter not dourefull.Only this
Ifayjthat bothinfaftingand in all other partes of difciplmejthe pa-
piftes fo haue nothing right, nothing pure, nothing well framed and
orderly,whereby they may haue any accafio to be prGude,as though
there were any thing remaining among them worthy of praifcr
zz There foUoweth another parte of difcipline , which pecu-
liarly belong;eth to the clergic.That is coteined in the canons which
the olde Biihops haue made ouer themfelues and their order . As
thefe be : that no clerke (hould geuc himfelfc to hunting, to dicing,
nor to banketiingrthat none (hould occupie vfurie, or merchandifc:
that none Oiould be prefentat wanton dauncings : and fuch other
ordinances. There were alfo added pcnahies;whereby the authority
of the canons was ftablifhed , that none (hould brcake them vnpu-
niflied. For this ende to euery Biihop was committed the goucrnc-<
met of his owne clergie,that they (hould rule their derkes according
to the canons , and holde them in their dutie. For this ende were
ordeined yerely ouerfeinges and Synodes,thatif any were ncgfeget in
his ductie,he (hould be admoni(hcd : if any had o(fended,he (hould
be punidied according to the meafure of his oflfencc. The Bifhops
alfo themfclues had yerely their prouinciall SynodcSjand in the bide
time yerely two Synodes , by which they vrereiiKlged iftheyhad
done any thing belide their duetie. For if any Bifhopwerc to hardc
or violent againft his clergie , they might appelle to thole Synodes,
although there were but one that complained. The fcuereft punilh-
mcnt was that he which had offended (hould be rcmoued from his
office,& for a time be depriued of the Comunion.And becaufe that
fame was a continual! order,they ncuer vfed to difmiflfe any Synodc,
but that they appointed a place and time for the next Synode. For,
to gather a gencrall Councell perteinedto theEmperoiKonely,a$
all the olde fummoningcs of Councells do teftifie. So long as this
feueritie flourifhed , the clerkes did require in word no more of the
people,than rhemfelues did pcrforme in example and decde. Yea they
were much more rigorous to themfelucs than to the people. And
verily fo it is mete, that the people (hould be ruled with a gentler &
loofer difcipline , as I may fo terme it : but the clerkes (hould vfc
(harper iudgements among themfelues , and (hould Icffe beare with
thcmfeluesjthan with other men.Howe all this is growen out of vfc,
it is
To Saluation. Lib4. 520
it is no neede to rehearfe, when at this day nothing can be imagined
more vnbridled and diffolute than the Clergie , and they are broken
forth to (o great licentioufneflc , that the whole world crieth out of
it. That all antiquicie fhould not feemc to be vttcrly buried among
them,I graunc in deede that they do with certainc madows decciue
the eyes of the fimple : but thofc arc fuch as come no nerer to the
auncient mancrs , than the counterfaitmg of an ape approcheth to
that which men do by reafon and aduifcThere is a notable place in
Xcnophon, where he tcacheth howc fowly the Pcrfians had fwarued
from the ordinances of their Elders, and were fallen from the rigo-
rous kindc of hfe, to foftoes and deintinefie » that yet they couered
this (hame » faying that they diligently kept the auncient vfases. For
*vhcn in the time of Cyrus fobnetie and temperace fo farre nonfhcd
chat men needed not to weepe y yea and it was accompted a fhamc:
with pofteritie this continued a religious obferuation , that no man
fhould drawe fnott out at his nofethriUes, but it was lawfull to fucke
ft vp, & fcede within euen till they were rotten the ftinkine humors
which they had gathered by gluttonous eating. So by the olde order
it is vnlawfuU to bring winepots to the horde : but to fwill in wine
chat they neede to be caried away dronken , is tolerable. It was or*
deinedto eate but ones in a day : this thefe good fucceffors haue
not abrogate, but they gaue leaue to continue their furfettings from
mid day to mid night. The cuftome was that me fhould make an end
of their dayes iourney fafting.But it was at hbertie & vfcdly the cut-
tome , for auoiding of wcrineflc ,to {hortcn their iourney to two
houres. Whenfoeuer the Papiftes fhall pretcnde their baftardc rules,
to {hewe themfelues to be like to the holy fathers : this example
fhall fufficicntly reproue their fonde countcrfaiting , that no painter
can more liuely exprefl'e ir.
2} In one thing they be to rigorous and vnentrearable , cbac
they geue not leaue to Pricfts to maty. But howc great libertie there
is among them to vfe whordome vnpunifhed, is not needefull t6 be
fpoken:& bearing them bold vpon their (linking vnmaricd Ufe,they
haue hardened themfelues to all wicked doings.But this forbidding
doth plainly (hewe, howe pellilente all their traditios are^forafmuch
as it hath not oncly fpoiled the Church of good and fict Pa{lors,buc
alfb hath brought in a horrible finke of mifcheues,& throwen many
(bules into the gulfe of defperation. Truely whereas mariage hath
bene forbidden to Pricfts , that fame hath bene done by wicked ty*
rannie,not onely againft the word of God, but alfo againft all equitie.
Firft CO forbiddc (hat which ch« Lordc bad lefcc at iibercie , was b/
Cap.i 2. Of the outwardc mcancs
no mcanes lawfull for men. Againc , that God hath cxprcflely pro^
uidcd by his word that this liberttc diould not be broken , i$ fo eui-
I. Tim. dentc that it needeth no long demoftration. I fpeake not howe Paul
j.z and in many places willeih a Bilhop to be the hufbande of one wife. But
1. 6. vvhat could be more veheroctly rpoken,than where he pronounceth
««T»m» by the Holy Ghoft , that there ihalbe in the laft times wicked men
that fhall forbidde manage:and he calleth them not onely dcceiuers,
but dcuells ? This therefore is a Prophecie , this is a holy Oracle of
the Holy Ghoft,whcrewith he willed to arme the Church aforchade
againft dangers, that the foftiddingof mariageis thedodrineof
deuells.But they thinke that they haue gaily efcapcd whe they wreft
this fentence to Montanu&, the Tatrans , Encrantes and other oldc
berctikes.They onely (fay they) condemned mariage : but we do not
condemne itjbut debarre the Clergie from it,for whom we thinke it
not to be c6uenient. As though albeit this prophecy was firfl fulfilled
in thofe aforefaid men > it might not alfo be apphed to thefe : or as
though thischildifli fond futteltie were worth the hearing,that they
fay that they forbidde it not , becaufe they forbid it not to all. For it
is all one as if a tyrant would affirme that it is not an vniuft lawe,with
vniuftice whereof one part alone of the citie is opprclTed.
24 They obied^that the Prieft doth by fome marke differ from
the people. As though the Lorde did not alfo forefee this,with what
ornaments Priefts ought to excell . So they accufe the Apoftle of
troubling the order and confounding the comlineffe of the Church>
which when he portrayed out the abfolute forme of a good BiHiopi
durft fet mariage among the other giftes which he required in him.
I knowc howe they expounde this, namely that none is to be chofen
that hath had a feconde wife. And I graunt that this is not a newe ex*
poGtion : but that it is a falfe expofition,appeareth by the text it fetfe,
becaufe he by and by after fetteth out of what qualities the wiues of
5iyj. Bifhops and Deacons ought to be. Paule reckeneth mariage among
ti.ad the Vertues of a Bifhop : thefe men teache that it is an intoUerable
epifco. faulte in the order of the Clergie. And,on Gods name,not cotented
^*^P^°' with this generall difpraife they call it in their canons vnclenneffc
and defiling of the flefh. Let euery man thinke with himfelfe out of
what workcfhop thefe things be comc:Chrift vouchefauethfoto
honor mariage that he willeth it to be an image of his holy con-
ioining with the Church.What could be fpoken more honorably to
fet out the dignitie of mariage ? With what face therefore (hall that
be called vncleane or defiled wherein (liineth a likcnelfe of the fpi-
rituall grace of Chrid?
t^ But
To Saluation. Lib.4. 521
. 1^ But nowe when their forbidding fo cuidcntly fightcth with
the word of God, yet they findc in the Scriptures wherewith to de-
fende ir. The Leuiticall Pncfts were bounde to he a fonder from
their wiues , fo oft as it came to their turnesto miniftcr, that they
might handle the holy things pure and vndeHlcd. Therefore it were
very vncomely , that our holy things , fith they be both much more
noble and doily ,{hould be handled of m3ned men. As though there
were all one pcrfon of the minifter of the Gofpcll, as was of the Le-
uiticall Pncfthade. For they , a* Hgures , reprefentcd Chrift , which
being the mediator of God and men ihould with moft^abfolutcpure-
nefle reconcile the Father vnto vs . But when finncrs coulde not m
cuery behalrc expreffc the figure of his holincflejyct that they
might with certaine groffc draoghtcs yelda Qiadoweot him, they
were commaunded to Durifie themlclucs beyond the maner oi men,
when they came to the Sanduaric : namely bccaufc they then pro-
perly figured Chrift, for that as paciHcrs to reconcile the people to
God they appeared at the tabernacle the image of the heauenly
iudgement featc. Forafmuch as the Pallors of the Church do not
beare this perfoive at this day , therefore they are vainly compared Heb.ij.
Withrhem. Wherefore the Apoitlc doth without exception boldly 4*
pronounce , that manage is honorable among all men , but that for
whoremongers and adulterers abideth the iudgement of God. And
the Apoltles themfelues did with their owne example approuc that
mariage is not vnmcte for the hohr.effe of any office bcitncuerfo
excelleni. For Paule witneflcth that they did not oncly kepe wiues, i.Cor.
but alfo carried them about with them. » 5»
16 Againe it was a maruclous ihamelcfneffe that they darft fet
out this comehncffc of chaftiric for a neceflarie thing , to the great
reproche of the oldc Churchrwhich when it abounded with lingular
learninge of God , yet excelled more in hoUnefle. For if they pafle
not vpon the ApoftleSj(a$ they arc wont fomtime ftoutely to dcfpife
them) what I befeche yoa will chey do to all the oldc father$,whoni
it is certainc to haue noj; oncly fuffered , but alio allowed mariage in
the order of Biihops f" They forfooth did nourilh a filthy profaning
of holy things , forafmuch as fo the mifteries of the Lorde were not
rightly reuercnccd among them. It was moued in decde in the Ni- Hiftor.
ceoe Synods to haue vnmaried life commaunded : as there alway j''^**^*^'
want not fomc fuperftitious men, which do eucr inuente (ome newc ^ | *
thing, to bring themfelues in admiration.But what was decrced?Thc
fentcncc of Paphnutius was afTented to, which pronounced that*
mans lying with his ownc wife is chaftitie. Therefore manage le*
vvv
Cap. 12. Of the outwardc mcancs
inatned holy among them : neither did it turns them to any n)ainf^
nor was thought to fpott the minifteric.
27 Then followed times, in which to fupcrftitious ob(eruation
of (ingle life grcwc in force.Hsreupon came thofe often and vnmca*
furably aduaunced praifes of virginitic , Co that fcarcely any other
vertue was thought among the people to be compared with it. And
although mariagc was not condemned for vncleane,yet the digniiic
thereof was fo diminiOied , and the holincife of it obfcured, that he
feemed not to afpirc with a courage ftrong enough to pcrfcdion,
that did not rcfrainc himfelfe from it. Hereupon came thofe canons
whereby it was firft forbidden that they which were come to the
degree of Pricfthodc fhould not comrade mariagc ; then,that none
{hould betaken into that order but vnmariedmen,or fuch as did
forfakc mariage together with their wiues. Thelc things , becaufc
they fccmed to procure reuerence to Priefthode , were ( I graunt)
cuenfrom antiquiticreceiued withgreatwellliking.Botif ihcaduer-
faries obied anciquitie againft me,iir(l I aunfwer that this libenie re-
mained both vnder the Apodles andincertaine ages after them, that
Bifhops might be maried : that the ApoHles themfeiues , and other
Paftorsof great authoritie which fucceded in their places , vfed the
fame without fticking at it. The example of that auncientcr Church
ought worthily to be of greater weight with vs , than that we (hould
thinke that to be either vnlavvfull or vncomely for vs which was
then with praife receiued and vfcd.Secondly 1 fay that that age which
forimmeafurablc affcdion to virginitie began to be partiall againft
mariage , did not fo lay vpon Priefts the lawe of vnmaried life, as
thou:^h it were a thing necelTarie of it felfc , but becaufe they pre-
ferred vnmaried men aboue the maried. Finally I aunfwer that they
did not fo require it that they did with force and nccciiitie conliraine
them to continence which were not fit to kepe it. For when they pu»
ni{hed whoredomes with n)oil feuere lawes> of them that contraded
manage they decreed no more but that they fhould geue oner the
execution of their office.
28 Therefore whcnfoeuer the defenders of this ncwe tyrannic
fhallfekethe pretenfeof antiquitic to defendc their vnm^aried life:
fo oft we ihall aunfwcre them with requiring them,that they reftorc
the olde chaftnefic in their Priefts : that they remoue adulterers and
whoremongers : that they fuffcr not thofe in whom they fuffer not
honeft andchaft vfe of mariage bed, to run vnpuni(hed into all kindc
of luft : that they call againe the difcontinued difciplinc, whereby all
wanconneiTcs may be reiirained : that they dehucr Uic Church Irom
tliis
CIS.
To Saluation. Lib.4. 522
thisfo wicked filthine!»,whcrwith it hath bene long dcformed.Whcn
they haue graunted this , then they muft aoainc be put in mindc ihac
they boft not that thing for ncceljaric , which being of it fclfc .nc h-
bcrtjc hangcth vpoii the profit of the Church. Yet I fay not this for
that I thinkc that in any condition place is to be geuen to :hofc ca-
nons which by the bonde of vnmaricd hfe vpon she order ot Pnefts:
but that the wifcr fort may vnderftanxic with what face out enemies
do fclaunder holy man.ige in Priefts , by obicding the name of anti*
ijuitic. As touching the fathers , whofe writings remame, cuen they
when they fpcakc of their owne iudgcment, except Hicrome, did not
with Co great ipitefuir.efie deface the honefty of manage. We (hAbc
content with one connniendaiion of Chriloftomc : becaufe hefith HomcJ.
he was a principal efleemcr of virginitic, can not be thought to hauc *^*^ ^"^^
bene morelauifhth.m oiher in commendition of managc.Thus he ''**' ^'^
faith: The firft degree ot chaftitieis pure virginitic : the fecondc u
faithful! mariage. Therefore the fecuide kinde of virginitic is the
cha(l loue of nutrimonie.
The xiij. Chapter.
OfvtvvtSy byrdsh ^omijh.g whereof eche num hath mfatAlj
mtan^ltd hir/.ftl/t.
IT is verily a thing to be lamented , that the Church , for whom
libcrtie was purchaied with the incftiniable price of the blood of
Chrift , hath bene fo oppreflld with cruell tyranny , and almott
ouerwhclmed with a huge heape of traditions: but in the mesne
time cuery mans priuate madneffc (heweth , that not without moft
iuft caufe there hath bene Co much permitted of God to Satan & his
minifters. For they thouf^hnt not enough, ncgieding the commaun-
deinent of Chrj|^,to beare any burdens whatfoeuer were layed vpon
them by falfe teachers, vnleffc tlicy did alfo eche man procure to
himfelfe feuerall burdens of hisownc , and fo with digging pittcs for
ihemfelucs fhould drowne themfelues deper . This was done while
they ftriued in dcuifing of vowesi by which there might be added to
the common bondes a greater andftreighter bindm^.Sith therefore
we haue taught,ihar by their boldnelTe which haue bot ne rule vndcr
.the litlc of Pnttors in the Church,theworfhippingof God hath bene
corruptedjwhen they fnared (illy cofcicnces with their vniuft lawes:
here it (hall not be out of feafon to adioine an other cuell which it
ncrc vnto it, that it may appeare that the world according to the
peruerfncflc of his owncdifpo(ition,hath alway, with fuch ftoppcs as
It could, put away the helpes whercb/ it Hiould haue. bene brougk
-iov»Ui.. VVV li
Gflp.13. Of the outwardc mcancs
Co God.Nowcthat it may the better appcare chat very greuous hurt
hath bene brought in byvowcs,lcc thercdcrs kcpe inmindethc
principles aboue fet. For Bt^ we haue taught , that whacfoeucr may
be required to the framing of life godhly & hohly,is comprehended
in the lawe. Againe wc haue taught , that the Lorde , that he might
thereby the better call vs away from deuifingof newe workes , hath
cnclofed the whole praifc of rightcoufneffc in the fimpie obedience
of his will. Ifthefe thingsbe truejitiseafy toiudgethat allfained
worlTiippings, which we inuent to our felues to deferue the fauor of
God , are not acceptable to him howe much focuer they pleafe vs.
And iruely the Lord himfelfe in many places doth not onely openly
rcfufe them , but alfo greuoufly abhorre them. Hereupon arifeth a
dout of thofc vowes which arc made bcfide the exprefTe word of
God, what accomptis to be made of them,whcther they may rightly
be vowed of Chriftian men , and howc farre they binde them. For
the fame which among men is called a promife , in refpe^ of God is
called a vowe. But to men we promife thofe things either which wc
thinkc will be pleafanc vnto them,or which we owe of dutie.T here-
fore there ought to be a much greater hedefull obferuatio in vowes
which are direded to God himfelfe , with whom we ought to dealc
ffioft earncftly. In this pointe fuperftition hath in all ages marue-
loufly rangedjfo that menne without iudgcment,without choifcjdid
by and by vowe vnto God whatfoeuer came in their minde, or into
their mouth. Hereupon came thofc follies , yea monttruous abfur-
ditics of vowes among the heathen,whcrewith they did to infolently
mocke with their gods. And I would to God that Chriftias alfo had
not followed this their boldnefTe. It ought not in deede to haue
bene fa : but we fe that in ccrtaine ages paft nothing hath bene more
vfuall than this wickednefrc>that the people cche where defpifing the
lawe of God did wholy burne with mad grccdinelTe to vowe what-
foeuer had pleafed the in their dreame. I will not hatefully enforce,
nor particularly rehearfe howe hainoufly and howe many wayes
herein men haue offended: but I thought good to fay this by the
way, that it may the better appeare , that we do not moue queftion
of aneedcleife mattcr,when we entreate of vowes.
2 Nowe if we will not erre in iudging which vowes be lawfull,
and which be wrongfull,it behoucth to wey three things: that js to
fay, who it is to whom the vowe is made : who we be that make the
vowe : loft of all , with what minde we vowe. The firft pointe hath
Coloif. re(ped to.chiSi that we Ihould thinke that v/e haue to do with God,
t.t3. whome our obedience fo much dclueth , that be pronounceth all
, s , willwor-
To Saluation. Lib.4. 52;
\rtftworfhips to beaccurfed , howc gay and glorious foeucr they be
in the eyes of men. If all voluntane worlhipps , which we our fclucs
dcuifc without commaundemetit , be abhominable to God.it follo-
weth thatno worftiipcan be acceptable to him but that which i$
allowed by his word. Therefore let vs not take fo great libcrtic to our
fclucs that wc dare vowc to God that which hath no teftimonic
bowc It is eftccmcd of him.For whereas that which Paulc teacheth, Rom 14
that it is finnc whatfoeuer is done without Faith , extendeth to all ^ 3
doings, then verily it chicfely haih place when thou dircdeft thy
thought the ttreight way to God.Buc if we tall and crre cucn in the
fmallcft things, (as Paul there difputcth of the difference of mcates)
where certai«tieof Faith fhineih not before vs; howc much more
modeftie is to be vfcd,when we attempte a thing of greatcft weight?
Fornothing ought to be more earned vnto vs than the duties of re-
ligionXct this therefore be the firft confideration in vowes, that wo
neucr come to the vowing of any thing, but that confciencchauc
firft certainly determined that it attempteth nothing raftly. But it
ihall then be free from danger of rafhncfTe , when it fhali baue God
going before it,and as it were cnform'ingit by his word what is good
or vnprofitablc to be done, ?♦"* • ob -f-i.) •< ^n /?d> d^id^N ?*
•'^'5 In the other thing which wc haue faid to bc-Jicrc to be conG*
deredjthis is contcined , that we meafure our owne ftccngthes, thar .. 'Ml
we haue an eye to our vocation , that wc negled not thebcncfite of ^
Iibertic which God hathgeuen vSiFor he that vowcth that which "'*
either is not in his powcr,or difagreeth with his vocationii$^ralli:and
he that defpifech the bountifulncfle of God, whereby he is appointed
Lordc of all thiniis,is vnthankcfuU.When I fay thos,! do not meane
that any thing is fo fett in our ownc hande , that ftandirig vpon con*
fidence of our ownc ftrengch wc may promifc the famcio God.For
k wasmoft truely decreed in the Councell at Araufium,th at nothing Concif.
is rightly vowed to God but that which we haue rccciucd of his Ar^jufi.
hande,forarmuch as all things that arc offred him arc his mere giftcsi "^^ ^ *
B« fith fome things are by Gods goodncflc gcucn vs >and other j,
fome things by his equitie denied vs : let eucry rnat> (as Paule com-* i.Cor.
maundeth) haue rcfpcd to the meafure of grace geuen vnro hint i».ii«
Thcreforcl do here meane nothing els, but that vowes rouft be tem*
^ered to that meafure which the Lorde prcfcnbeth there in bis gc*
iiing:lcft if thou attempt further than he permitteth,thou throw thy
felfc downe hedlong with taking to rouch vpon thee. As for example.
When thofe murtherersyof whom mention is madcrin Luke, vowed Ad.j j,
ch^t they would taft pf no meatc till Paulc wercfkvcocalthough tho * ^*
V3 VVV iij
Cap. 1 3 , Of the outwardc mcanes
dcuile had not bene wicked , yet the raOineire it felfc was not to be f
fuff^rcd, that ihey m.:de the life and death of a man fubiciit to thcii';
ftid II. power.So Icphthe fufFrcd punifhmct for his folly ,v. he with hedlong
^°* heare he conceiucd an vnaduifed vovye.' In which kn\dt vnmaned
life hath the chicfe place of mad boldneire. For facriiicing Prieftcs,
nionke$,and nonneSjforgetting their owire weakenc(fc,chinke them-;
fciues able tokepe vnmariedlife.But by WhaDOt acJe arc they UMght;
that they lliall hauechaftitie throughout all tiieir life, to the very
jcn. 1. cnde whereof they vowc it? Tbey heare the word of Godconccr«%
8. ning the vniuerrail ftate o{ men » It is not good fof mao to be alone* ,
They vndcrilande,and 1 would to God that they dtdnqt fcle, that,
finne remaining III vs IS not witHoutrnort iharpe pnckes. With what
conHdcnce dare they fliakc of that gcntrall calling; for all thjcirhfc:
long: whereas the gift of continence i$oftener grauntedfor acer^^
tainc time as opportunitic requireth t^ /n fuch ftubborntfic kt cheni(
notlbke for God to be their helptf : but let them rather remember
that which isfaid. Thou Oialt not tenpt the Lorde thy God, And
this is to tempt God,to endeuor againihhe nature put in v$ by him,
and todcfpifclns prelent giftes as though they nothing belonged
vnto vs. Which they not onely do : but alfo mariagc it felfc » which
God thought it not againft his maicftie to inftitute , which he hath
ricb.T J. pronounced honorable in all men , which Cbrift our Lordc hath
♦ fandified'With his prefcnce,which he vouchefaued to honor with hiSf
loiua.a firft miradcthey dare call defiling, one^y to aduaunce with mamcri
lous commendations accrtaine vnmarned life of what fprte foeuer
it be. As though they themfelues did not lliewe a clere example in
theii; life » that vnmaned ftate is one ihin^ , and virginitie an other^i
which their life yet they moft (hamclcfly call Angelike, doing herein
verily to great iniuric to the Angels of God , to whom they com-^j
pare whoremongers, adulterers , and fomewha? els much vvorfe and
filthier. Andtruely hercneedcnoargumentes.when they are operv>
ly confuted by the thing it felfc. For we plainely fe,with howe hor-i
rible paincs the Lorde doth commonly take vengeance of fuch ar«
rogance , and contempt of his giftes by to much truft iti themfelues^
I fpare for fhanse to fpeake of the more fecrctc faultcs.of which cueii
this that is already pcrceiued is to much. It is out of cotrouerlie that
we ought to ^fow.c nothing , that may hinder vs from fcruing of out
yocation.' As if a houfeholder (hould vowe , that he will leaqe hjs
wife and his children and take other charges in hande : or if he that
is fit to beare office , when he is chofcn do vowe thar he will be a
priuace man. But what is meant by this ^ chat our Iibacie ihould not
To Saluation. Lib.4. - ' 524
be dcfpifcdjhath fomc difficulty if it be not declared.Thcreforc thuf
in fewc wordes I cxpoundc it. Siih God haih made v$ Lordes of all
things , and hath fo made them fubicd vnto v$ that we fhould vfc
them all for our commoditic : there is no caufc why we (hould hope
that it (haibe an acceptable workc to God if we yclde our klues into
bondage to the outwardc thinges which ought to be ahelpe vmo
¥$. I fay this for this purpofc , bccaufc many do hereby feke praife
of humilitie, if they fnarc themfeiues with many obfcruattons, from
which God not without caufe willed vi to be free and difcharged.
Therefore if we will cfcapc this danger , let v$ alway remember chac
vie ought not to depart from that order which the Lorde hathor-
deined in the Chriftian Church.
4 Nowe I come to that which I did fet in the thirdc pjaccrihae
it is much matcriall with what minde thou malccft a vowc , if thou
wilt haue it allowed of God. For iith the Lorde regardeth the hart,-
not the outward fhcwe , it cometh to palTe that thefclfc fame-thing,
by changing the purpofc of the minde , doth fometime pleafc him
and is acceptable vnto him , and fometime hiely^difplcafcthhim. If
thou fo vowc the abfteining from wine, as though there were any
holineffe hi ir,thou art fuperftitiousrif thou haue rcfped to any other
cndc which is not cuell,no man can difallowe u.Burm my iudgement
there be fowcr cndes , to which our vowes (halbe rightly diredcdf
of which for teachings fake Ircfcrrctwoto thctimepaft,andthe
other two to the time to come.To the time paft belongthofe vowes,
whereby we do cither teftific our thankfulnelTc to God for benefites
receiued : or to craue the turning away of his wrath , we our fcluc*
do punifli our fclues for the offenfcs that we haue committed.Lct vs
call the Hi ft fort, if youwill,thec3cercifesof thankc(geuing,thcoihcr
of repentance. Of the firft kinde we haue an example in the tithes
which lacob vowed, if the Lorde did bring him home fafe out of
banifhcment into his contree. Againe in the oldc Sacrifices of the Gcn.aJ
peaceoffi-ings , which godly kinge&and capitjiines , when they toke *9* ^
in hande righteous warrc , did vowc that they would pay if they had j.^'/^*
obteined the vi£torie,or at leaft when they were opprcffed with j^* ij,
any great diftrelfe, if the Lorde had delmcred thcm.So arc all thofe 8c iiS.
places in the Pfalmes to be vndcrftode which fpcake of vowes. i4«iSp
Such vowes may at this day alfo be in vfe among vs , fo oft as the
Lorde hath deliucred vs either out of any calamitie , or from a hard
ficknefle , or from any other danger. For ic is then nocagainftthe
dutie of a godly manne , to confccrate to God his vowed oblation^
as a (blemne token of his rckDowIedging, leaft he (houldeteemc
r.^u VVV mj
Cap.ij. , Of the outwardcmcanes
vnthankfuU toward his goodneflc. Of what fort the fccondc kindc is,
icfl^allfufficc tofhewc withone onely famiharcxample.If anybyihe
▼ice of glutconie be fallen into any offenfe , nothing withftandeth
burthattochaiiifc his intemperance he may for a time foriakeall
deinty mcates , and may do the fame with a vowe adjoined , that he
may binde himfelfe with the ftrcightcr bonde. Yet I do not fo make
aperpetuall lawe to them that haue bkewifc oftendcd : but 1 fhewc
what is lawfull for them to do , which (hall thinke fuch a vowe pro-
Stable for themfelues. I do therefore fo make fuch a vowe lawfull,
that in the meanc time I leaue ir at libertie.
. 5 The vowes that arc applied to the time to come,partly (as we
haue already faid ) do tende to this ende that we may be made the
warcr:& partly that as it were by certaine fpujres we m;»y be pricked
forwarde to our dutic. Some man fe.eth him felfe to be fo inclined
XO fomc certaine vice , that in a thing which othcrwife is not cuill he
can not temper himfelfe from fallinge foorthwith into an cuill : he
fljilldo nothmg inconueniently ifhedofora time by vowe cut of
fro hmifelfc the yfeof that thing. As if a man know that this or than
apparcll of body is perilous ynto him, and yet entifcd with, deiire he
carncftly court it , what can he do better , than if in putting a bridle
vpon htmfclf^hat isjn charging himfelf with neceflitic of abfteining
from itjbe dcliucr himfelfe from alldouting? Likewife if a man be
forgetfullorflowc to necclfarie dutiesof godlineflejwhy may he not
by taking a vowe vpon him both awake hismemoricand (hake of
his flouthfulnefle? In both I praunt that there is a forme of childiihe
fchoohng: but cucn in this that they arc hclpes of weakenefle , they
are not without profit vfcd of the rawc and vnperfedl. Therefore we
{lialfay th3tthofc vowes arc lawful which hauerefpedtoonc of thcfe
cndcs,fpeci?llv in outward things,if they both be vpholdcn wit!i the
allowance of God,and do agree with our vocation, and be meafured
by the power of grace geuen vs of God.
6 Nowe alfo it is not hard to gather what is generally to be
thought of all vowes. There is one common vowe of all the faithful,
which b^ing made in Baptifme we do confirmc and as it were ftabhfh
byCatechilmc and receiuing of the Supper. For the Sacramentci
are ascharters,by which the Lordcdehuerethtovs his mercy afld
thereby euerlalhng life , and we againe on our bchalfes do protni(e
him obedience.Bat this is the forme or verily the fummcof the vow,.
that forfaking Satan we yeldc our felues into feruicc to God , to
obey his holy commaundementcs , and not to followc the perucrfc
defircs of our fie(h. It ought not to be doutcd but that this vt>we,
. fith
To Saluation. Xib.4. 525
fith it hath teftimony ot the Scnpturc , yea and is required of ail the
children of God,i$ both iioly and pioHcablc to faluation. And it ma-
kcth not to the c6crary,that no man in this hie performcth the pcrf»
fed obedience of the lawe which God requircihot vs. For lith this
forme ofcoucnanting is comprifed within the icouenani of ;jrace,vn-
der which is containca both forgiucnefic of (innes and the Spirit of
Sandification.thc promilc which we there make is ioyncd both with
befeching of pardon and with crauing of helpc. In ludgmg of parti^
cular vowes , it is neccflary to kepc in minde ihc three former rulcSt
whereby we may fafcly wcie of what fort euery vow is. Neither y^t
thinke that I fo commcndc the very fame vowes which I affirmc to
be holy, that I wouJd haue them to be daily. Foe though I dare teach
no cci taine rule of the number or iime:yct if any man obey my cou-
rcll,he (hall tai<e vpon him none but fober and for a time . For if thou
oftentimes brcake foorth into making of many vowes , all religiouf-
neflc will with very continuance grovve out of eftimaiion with thee*
and thou (halt come to a bendmge readincflc to fall into fupcrftiri-.
on. If thou binde thy fclfc with a pcrpetuall vowe , either fgr
great payne and I edioufncfi'e thou flialtvndo it, or beingc wericd
with longc continuance thou fnalt at one time orothet be boldc to
brcake ir. -
7 Now al(b it i$ plainc with how great fuperftition in this bchalfc
the worldc hath in ceriainc ages paft bin p<?ircirrd. One man vovve4
that he woulde abftaine from wmc : as tiiougbabftaininge from wine
were of it felfe a worfhip acceptable to God. An other boundc him*
felfc to fafting, an other to abiiaining from flclli for ccrtainc daies, in
which he had with vame opinion fained to be a (ingular holinelTe a«
boue the reft. And fcmie things alfo were vowed much more chiidifh^
although not of children. For this was holden for a great wifdom,to
lake vpon them vowed pilgremages to holycr placcs,& fomtime ci-»
ther to go all their ioumcy on footc, or with their body halfe naked,
rhat by their werincs the more mcrite might be gottcn.Thefe & fuch
otherjWith incredible zeale wherof the world hath a while fwelled,if
they be examined by ihofe iules,which we haue aboue fette, (halbc
found not only vainc & trifling,but full of manifcft vngodlincfTc.For
howfocuer the flc{h iudge,God abhorreth nothing more than fained
worfhippings.Therc arc befidc this thofc pernicious & damned opi-
nios, that hipocntes whe they haue fuch tiiHes thinke that they haue
gotten no fmal righteoufnesrthey repofc the fummc of godlmeflc in
jputwardc obfeiuationsuhey defpifc all other that arc lelic careful! of
fuchthinges.
Cap. 1 3 . Of the outward mcancs
"8 To rcckcn vp all the particular formes, is nothingc to purpofc*
But foiafmuch as the monkifli vowcs arc had in greater reucrcncc,
becaufe they fccme allowed by the common iudgement of v church:
ef thofe It is good to fpeakc briefly. Firft Icaft any fhould by prefcrip-
tion of long time defendc monkery, fuch as it is at this day,it is to be
noted that in old time there was in monafteries a farre other order of
Ituing. Such as were dilpofed to exercifc themfclucs to grcateft feuc-
fity and patience,went thither. For what ttianer of difciplme they fay
that the Lacedemonians had vndcir the iawes of Lycurgus, fuch was
ar that time amongc the m<Mikes,yea and much more rigorous.Thcy
(Icpt vpon the gj ound:their drinke was water:thcir meate was bread,
berbes Si rootcs:the»f chiefe dcinties were in oyle and ciches. They
abftamed from all delicate diet and trimming of body.Thercthingf
might fccme abouc tructh,if they were not written by witnefTcS that
faw & proued thcm,as Gregory N32ian2cn,Bafile,and Chryfoftomc,
But with (iich introdudions they prepared themfelues to grcate ©AS-
eeSi For, that the colledges of monkes were then as it were the fedc-
ploctcs of the order of minifters of the Church.both thefc whom wcf
bauc now named are a profe plain enough,(ror they were all brought
^pin monaiterics and from thenfe called to the office of bifhops) dc
alfo many other Gagular and excellent men in their time . And Au-
guftinc {heweth that this was alfo vfed in his time , that monaftcrits
Ipi, Si. yelded clerkes to the Church. For he fpcakcth thus to the monkes of
the Iflc of Caprarea:Butyou brethren we exhort in the Lord,thaiy<J
kepe your purpofe and continue to the cnd:& if at any time our mo.
ther the Church (hall require your trauaile , do ye neither with grc dy
pride take it vpon you, nor with flattering flourhfulneflc refufe ir-.but
with a meke hart obey to God. Neither preferrc ye your owne quiet
kafure aboue the neceifiiics of the Church.to whom if no good me
wpould haue miniftredin her tFauaile,you fhould not hauc found ho\v
you (bouldc hauc bin borne. He fpeakcth there of the mimftery, by
Sp*.?^" which yiaithfull are fpiritually borne againe. Alfo to AureliusrThere
is both occafion of fallinge giuen to themfelues , and moft havnous
wronge done to the order of the Clergy , if forfakcrs of monafteries
be chofen to the fouldiorfhip of the Clergy;wh5 euen of thofe that
rcmainc in the monaftcry , we vfe to take into the Clergy none but
the moft approucd and beft. Vnlcflc pcrhappes as the common pco*
pie fay , he is an euill pyper but a good flddler : fo it ihall alfo be
fcftingely faid of vs, he is an euill monke, but a good Clcrke.It is too
much to be lamented, if we lift vp monkes into fuch a ruinous pride^
and thinkc Clerkes worthy of fo great rcprochc , whereas (bmctime
euen
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 52^
eacn a good monkc makexh not a good Gierke, if he hauc fiiflficient
contincncc.&yec want ncccfl'ary learningc.By thcfc places n appea-
rcthjthat godly me were wont with the diCciphnc of monkcs to pre-
pare themftlucs to the gouernmeniot the Church,thatthey mighc
the fitter and better intruded take Co great an office vpon thcm.NoC
that they all attained to this cnd,or yet tended toward it,wlie for the
moft part they wcf c vnlcarned me:but i'uch were chofcn out as were
mete for it.
9 But chiefly in two places he paintcth out vnto vs the forme of ^
the oldemonkerie. In the bookc Of the manners oF the Catiiohkc . r
Churchjwhere he fetteththe hohneff<; of that profeil'ion agami^ the
fciaundcrs of the Mamchees:& in an other bookc,which he enticled
Of the worke ofmonkes, where he inueieth againft ccrininc degcn-
drcd monkes , which began to corrupt that order. 1 will here fo ga-
riier a fummc of thofe thingcs which he layth , that fo nere as I may
I will vfc his owne wordes.DcfpHinge(fayth he)the cnaccmcntes of Dcmo»r
this worlde, gathered into one moft chalt and hoiy lite, they fpendc ^cc'eC r
theirtime together, liuinge in praters, vcadingcs , and difputations, ^^^' ^
not fwellmg with pride.nottroublefome with ftubbornnc$,not wane
with enuioufneflV. None pofle/Tcth any thinge of htsownc,nonc is
burdenous to any man.They get by working with chctr tiandcs thole
things wherewith both their body may be fed, and their minde may
not be hindered fro God. Their worke they deliu^r co them whom
they call Dcanes.Thofc Dcanes defpifing all ihinges with great care-
fulneffeniakc accompt thereof to one whoavthcy call fjihcr. Thcfc
fathers not only moft holy in mancrs, but alfo moft excellent in god-;
ly do<5rine,hye in all things, do with no pride prouide for the whonp
they call children, witfi great authority of them in commaunding,&'
great willingncs of the other in obeying: They come together at ihep
V^ry laft time of the day,cucry one from his dwclhng, while they be
yet faftingjto hcare that Father:& there mete tcgcther to euery one
of thcfe Fathers at thelcaft three tboufand men, (he fpeaketh chiefly
of i5,gypt, and of the eaft ) then they rcfrefh their body, To much 2S
fuffifcth for life and hcalthfiiineffe, eucry man reftrainuig his dcfirc,
not to take largely eucn of thofe thingcs that they haue prefent very
ipjare and vile. So ihcy do not onely abftaine from fle{he and winc,fo
nauch that they may be able to tame their luftes , but fi 6 fuch things
which do fo much more greedily prouokc appetite of the belly and
throie) howc much they feeme to other, to be as it were cleaner,by
colour whereof the filthy dcfire of cxquifire meates , which is not m
^ihtii wonc to be fondly and fowly defended. Whatfoeuer remay>->
Cap. 1 3 • Of the outward mcancs
neth abouc ncccfiary foode(as there remaineth oftentimes much of
the workes of their handes and pinching of chcir fare) is with greater
care diftributed co the poorc,than tt was gocteo by them that diftri*
bute it.For they do in no wiCc trauail that they ro;iy haue abundance
of thefc things,but they by all mcancs endeuor that that which they
haue aboundmge may not remainc with them. After wardc when he
hath rehe^rfed the hardntfie , whereof he himfclfe had fcenc exam-
_, . . ^^ pies both at Millaine and elfc where: among thefe thingcs(faych he)
cap. J5 • "° *"^^ ^* enforced to hard thmgcs which he can not bearerna man
Tjt.1.15 IS charged with that which he refufeth : neither is he therefore con-
demned of the rcf^becaufc he cofeffeth himfelfc to want ftrength in
folowmg of them; for they remember how much charity is comme*
ded;they remember that all ihmges are cleane to the cleane.Thcrc-
fore all their dihgece watchcth,not to the refufing of kindes of meate
as vnclcane,buc to tame luft, 8c to retaine the loue of brechren.Thcy
i«Cor.tf remember,meate for the bclly,and the belly for meates.&c. Yctma-
• J- ny ftrongc do abftaine for the weakes fakes . Many of them haue no
nedc to do thus: but becaufc it pleafeth them to fuftaine themfcluec
with bafcr diet and nothing fumptuous. Therefore they themfelucs,
which being in health do forbeare,ifconfideratiGn of their helth co*
pell, when they arc fickc do take without any fcare. Many drinke no
wine , & yet they thinke not thcmfclues defiled with it:for they moft
gently caufe it to begiucnto the fainter, and to them that can not
get the health of their body without itrandibme which foolifhly re-
ftife it , they do brotherly admoniihe that they be not with mine fu-
perftition fooiicr made weaker than holier . So they diligemly exer-
ctiegodhncffe.'but they know that thcexercifing of the body pcrtai-i
neth but to a fliort time. Charity is chiefly kcp^to charity the diet>to
charity the fpeech,co charity the apparel,to charity the countenance
ia fitted.Thcy mete and confpire into one charity. To offend it is ac-
compted as haynous as to ofFende God. If any re^ charity ,he is caft
oiut and fliunned. If any ofFende charity.hc is not fuffred to abide one
day. Forafmuch as in thefc words,as in a painted tablctthat holy maii>
femethto haue fet out what maner of life monkery was in oldctimc,.
aJthough they were fomwhat long,yct I was content to enterlacc the
here:bccau{c I faw thati fhold haue bin fomwhat longer if I had ga-
thered the fame thirds out of diuers , how much foeuer I ftudicd for
briefeneffe.
• lo But my purpofe here is not to go through this whole matter,
but only by the way to point outjnot only what manef of monkes the
Old Church had, but what maner of thing the profcflion qF monke* :
was
ToSaliiarion. Lib.4. 527
tras at that time : (o as the foundc wittcd readers may iudgc by die
companfon , what face they haue which allcage antiquity to main-
taine the prefcnt monkery. A uguliinc when he depamteth vnio rs a
holy & true monkery,would haue to be abfcnt all rigorous cxattitig
of thofc things which by the word of the Lord are left vs at hbcrty.
But there is nothingc that is at this day more fcucrely required. Foe
they compt it amifchiefe chat can ncuer be purged , if any do ncucr
fo litle fwaruc from the prefcribed rule in colour or fafhion of gar*
mentjin kindc of mcate,or in other trifling & cold ceremonies. Au- jj^
guftine ftoutly mainiaineth,that it is not lawful for monks to liuc idle p^^
vpo other mens. He denieth that there was cucr in his time any fuch mo-
example of a well ordered monaftcry .Our men (ct the chiefc part of Qaciu
their hohncflc in idleneflc.For if you take idlcnci from them, where •
ihalbe that contemplatiue life whereby they boaft that they exceil
all other men,and approch nere vnto AngclsPFinally Augdiine rc-
^uireth fuch a monkcry,as (hould be nothing but an exercife & help
to the dueties of godlineffe which arc commended to all Chriftians,
What ? when he maketh charity the chiefc,yca and almoft only rule
therofjdo we thinke that he praifeth a confpiringjwherby a few men
being bound together,are feuered from y whole body of the church/
But rather he willcth them with their example to giue light to other
to kepe the vnity of y Church. In both thcfe points,thcre is fo much
difference of the monkery at this prefcnt , that a manne can fcarcely
finde any thing more vnlikc,l will not fay contrary. For our monkcfi
not contented with that godline$,ro the ftudy of which alone Chnft
commaundeth them that are his concinually to apply , do imagine I
Vfotc not what newe godhneffe.by meditation whereof they may be
perfc^er than other.
II If they deny thi«»T would know ofthem why they vouchfaue
to giue Co their owne order alone the title of perfedion , and take a-
way the fame from all the callings of God. Neither am I ignorant of
that fophifticall folution , that it is not therefore fo called becaufe it
:<loth containe perfcdion in it , but becaufe it is the bcft of all other
to atcaine perfedion . When they are difpofedto boaft themfcluet
before the people, when to fnarc vnikilfull and vnware yongc men,
when to mamtaine their priuilcge$,whcn to aduaunce their owne di*
gnity to the reproch ofother,then they boart that they are iny ftarc
of perfeAon. When they are fo nye driuen that they can not defend
<his vainc arrogance, then they tiee to this ftarting hole,^ they haue
not yet attained perfcdion,buc that they are m the fame ilatc whcrm
they aipire vnto itabouc other. In the means time that admiration
Cap. 13. Of the outward mcancs
among the people rcmaineth, as ihough the only monkifti fife were
angeUkc,pcrfed,& denied from all fault. By this pretence they make
moft gaineful markets,but thaifamc modcratioQ heth buried in a few
bookes. Who doth not fee that this is an intollerablc mockery > But
let v$ fo reafon with the, although they gauc no more 10 their pro*
ftilion than to call it a ftatc of attaining pcrfedion. Verily in gHnng*
it this name , they do as by a fpeciail markc make it dffferrngc from
other kindes of life . And who can abide this, tha? fo great honor
fhoulde be giucn away to an ordinance chat is no where by any one
fyllable ailowed : and that by the fame all other callinges of God,
which arc by his owne holy mouth notoncly commaunded,but al-
fo commended with notable titles of praife,are by the fame accomp-
tcd vnworthy/And how great wrong(I beiech y ou)is done to God,
when I wore not what new founde thingc is preferred aboue all the
kindes of life ordained by himfclfe»and pratfcd by his owne tcftimo-
nic f
1 X But go to , let them fay that it is a fclannder which I haue be-
fore faid,that they are not cotcntcd with the rule prefcribed of God.
Yet though I hold my peace, ihcy thcmfelucs da more than enough
accufe thcmfelues.For they openly teachc,thatthcy rake vpon them
- morcburde than Chrift laid vpon his:becaufc forlboth they promifc
to kepe the counfels of the Golpel concerning louing their enenncs, .
not couetingofreiienge,not fwearing.&c. To which thmgs Chrifti-
ansarenotgenerally bound. Herein what antiquity wilhhey {hew c
foorth againft vs?This neuer came in any of the old fathers mindes.
They all crie out with one voice that there was no one litlc wofd at
all vttercd oi Chrift, which ought not neceflarily to be obeyed. And
without any doutinge they do echewhere teache, thatthcfe very
fame thinges by name were commaundementcs , wl.ich thcfe good
expofitors triflingly fay, that Chrift did but counfell. But forafmuch ^
as we haue before taught that this is a moft peftilent crrour , lette itT
fuffife here to haue briefly noted that the monkery which is at this
day,i$ grounded vpon the fame opinion, which all the godly ought
worthily to abhorrc : which \s^ that there (houlde be imagined fomc
perfeder rule of life , than this common rule which is giucn of God
to the whole Church. Whatfoeuer is builded vppon this fundation,
can not be but abhominable.
I J But they bring an other proofe of their perfedion.which they
thinke to be moft ftrog for thcm.Por the Lord fayd to the yongman
Matt.i5> chat asked him of the perfcdion of righteoufneffe , If thou wilt be
''* perfed,feU all that thou haft and giue it to the poore. Whether they
do
To Saliiation. Lib.4. 528
clo (b6r no,I do not yet difputc:but graunt the that for this prdcnc
Therefore they boaft y they be made pet ff^ by forfaking all theirf.
If the fumme of perfe^lion (bnd in this,whai racaneth Paul when he i.<
tcachcth}that he which hath diftnbuted all his goodes to the poorc. i j* j«
vnlefTe he hauc chaiiiy,is nothm^?Whai mancr of pcrfcdio is this,
which if charity be abfenc, is brought with man to nothinge ?Herc
they muft nedcs anfwere,that this is the chiefeft in dede,but notthe
only workc of pcrfedion.But here alio Paul crieth agamd thc,which ^*^§m
fticketh not to make charity the bonde of perfedion , without any '^
fuch forfaking. If it be certainc that bctvreoethe maifter & the di*
fciple is no difagreement , and the one of them clearely denteth the
perfedion of man to confift in this f he Ihould forfake allhis goods,
and againe affirmeth, that perfedion is without it : we muft fee howe
that layinge ofChrill is to be taken , If thou wilt be perfed , fell all
that thou haft. Nowc, itfhalbe no darkc fenfe, if we wey(which vtc
ought alway to marke in all the preachings of Chrift)to whom the(e
wordes be diredcd. A yong man asketh,by what woikes he fhall en- Lucif^
ter into euerlaftinge lifc.Chrift,becaufe he was asked of workes/en- »!•
deth him to the law,& rightfully : for it is the way of erernall hfe,if ic
be conddered in jc fclfe, and is no othcrwife vnable to bringc falua-
tion vnto vs but by our owne peruerlenefle . By this anfwerc Chrift
declared, that he tcachcth no other rule to frame hfe by , than the
fame that had in olde time bin taught in the law of the Lord. So did
he both giuc wimefTe to the lawc of God,that it was the dodrine of
pcrfed righceoufheffe : and therewithal! did mete with fclaunders,
that he ihoulde notfeeme by any new rule of life to (hrrc the peo-
ple to forfaking of the law.The yont;c man beinge in deedc not of an
cuill minde,but fwellinge with vainc conHdece,anrwered that he had
from his childehoode kept all thecommaundementesof thelaw. Ic
is moft certaine that he was an infinite fpace diftant fro that to which
he boaftcd that he had attained. And if his boaliinge had bin true^he
had wanted nothinge to the hieft pcrfedion . For we haue before
(hewed,that the Jaw containeih in it felfe perfect rightcoufnefle: and
the fame appeareth hereby , that the keping of it is called the way of
cternatl faluation. That he might be taught to knowc howe lide he
had proStedin thatrighteoufnelfe, which he had too boldly anfwc-^
red that he had fulfilled , it was p roficable to (hake out a familiar faulc
of his. When he abounded in richefle, he had his hart fattened vppon
themThcrefore becaufe he felt not this lecrete wound,Chrift laun-
ced him. Go (fayth he) fell all that thou haft. If he had bin fo good
a keeper of the Uwci as he thought he wa$,he woulde not haue gone
Cap.13. -; ♦■ Of the outward mcancs
Hway forowefull wlien he heard this word. For who fo loueth God
with all his hart, whatfoeucr difagrceth with the louc of him» he noc
oncly takcth it for dongc, but abhorreth as bringingc dclhudion.
Thcrforc whcras Chrift commaundeth the couetous richc man to
leaue all that he hathjit is all one,as if he fliould commaund the am-
bitious man to forfuke all honors,the voluptuous man all dcliteSjand
the vnchaft man ail the mftrumentes of lull. So confcienccs that arc
touched with no feeling of gcnerall admonition,mull be called back
to the particular feoliiige of their owne eudl . Therefore they do in
vaine draw this fpeciallcafe togenerall expoluion,as though Chrift
did let the per tectum of man in forfaking of goodsiwheiea;. he ment
nothing elfe by this rayinge,than to dnue the yoni;man that ftoodc
too mu< h in his owne conceite, to feelc his owne fore, that he might
vndci ftande that he was yet a great way diftant from perfed obedi-
ence of the lawjwhich other wile he did falfly take vpo him. I graunt
that .hii place hath bin euill vnderibndcd of fome of the fathers, &
that therupon grew this coucting of wilful pouerty,wherby they on-
ly were thought to be blelVed, which forfaking all eatthly things,did
dedicate themfclues naked to Chrift, But I truft that all the good and
not contentious men will be fatisficd with this my cxpo(ition,fo that
they Hiall no more dout of the meaning of Chrift. Howbeic the Fa-
thers thought nothing IcfTcthan to ftablifli fuch a perfedion,as hath
fince bin framed by the cowled Soplufters, thereby to raife vp a dou-
ble Chriftianity.For that dodrineful of {acrilege wias not yet borne,
which comparech the profedion of monkery toBjptifme,yeaand o-
penly affirmethjthatit is a forme of fecond Baptifme.Whocan dout
that the Fathers with all their hem abhorred this blafphemy ? Nowf
as toiichmge that laft thingc , which Auguftine layth to haue bin a-
mong the olde Monkes, that isjthat they applied themfclues wholly
to Chari ty; what neede I to fhe w in wordcs that it is moft farre from'
this newe profeflion ? The thinge it (life fpeakcth, that all they that
go into MonafterieSjdcpart from the Church. For why ? Do not they
fcuere themfclues from the lawfull fclowlhip of the faithful, in taking
to themfclues a peculiar miniftcry and priuate miniftration of Sacra-
mentcs ? What is it to difTolue the Communion of the Church , if
this be not it? And(that I may follow the comparifon which I began
to make, and may once conclude it) what haue they in this behalfc
like to the olde monkes ? They although they dwelt feuerally from
other men , yet had not a feucrall Church : they did partake of the
facramentes together with other : they appeared at fdlemnc aifem-
blics; there they were a part of the people. Thcfe mcn,in crcding to
themfclues
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 529
thcmfclucs a priuatc altar, what hauc they cifc done but broken the
bond of vnity^For they hauc both excommunicate thcmrdues from
the whole body of the Church, & hauc dcfpifed the ordmary mmi-
ftcry, whereby the Lord willed to hauc peace & charity kept among
bis. Therefore howc many mmifterics thcrcbe at this day, I fay that
there be fo many aflembhcs of fchifmatikcSjwhich troubling,' the or-
der of the Church,3rc cut of from the lawfull fclowfliip of the faith-
ful!. And that thii departing fliould not be fecret, they haue giucn ro
thefelues diuers names oHcdes. Neither were they afhamed to bo.ift
of thar, which Paul doth fo dcteft that he can not f.jfiicjentlv amph-
fic the hainoufncs of it-VnlelFe pcrhap we ihinkc thatChrifl was di-
uidcd of the Corinthiajis, when one gloried of one teacher, & .in o-
ther of an other: & that now it is done without any iniury to Chi .ft,
that in ftedc of Chnftians we hearc fomc called Bcnedidmcs , (omc
FrancifcancSjfome Dominicancs:& that they arc fo called, that ihey
themfelues when they couet to be fcucraily knowcn from the com-
mon fort of ChriftiaSjdo with great pride take ihefe tides toihcxor
the profcfllon of their religion.
1^ Thcfe differences which I haue hitherto rchearfcdbetwcnt
the old monies & the monkes of our age,are not differences in ma^
ncrs,but in the profefllon it felfc.Thercforc let the readers rcmcber
that i h.iuc rather fpokc of monkery than of monks, & haue touched
thofe faultcs^noc which fticke in the hfe of a few of ihcm.but which
can not be fcucrcd from their very order of liuinge it felfe. But what
differeceis in their maners, what nede I particulaily todeclare?Thi$
is ccrta'ne , that ihcic is no degree of men more defiled with all fil-
thineffc of vices : no where more are fadions, hatredes, aff-'^ions o£
parties, ambirions whorer than among tliem.In dcde in a few mona-
Iterics they hue chaftly , if it be to be called chaftity where luU is fo
farre kept downe that it be not openly euiil fpokcn ofyet a man (hall
fcarccly findc cuery teth monaftery which is not rather a ftewes tha a
holy houfc of chaftit)'.Buc what honeft fparing is in their diet? Swine
be none otherwife fatted in fties.But leail they fliould complainc that
I handle them too vngently,! go no further. Howebeicm thofe few
things which I hauc touched,whofoeucr knowcth the thingc it fclfe
will confeffe that there is nothinge fpoken accuferlike . Auguftme,
when according to his tcftimony monkes excelled m lo great chalhiy,
yet complaincth that there were many vagabundes, which with cuil
crafrcs and deccites wiped fimple men from their money,which with
carying about the rclicjiies of martyrs did vfc filthy marchandilinecs,
yea and in ftccdc of the relioucs of martyrs did (hew forth the boiie*
XXX
Cap,
,13. Of the outward mcancs
of any other dead men , and which with many luch wicked doingcs
fclaundered the order , As hereporceththat hefawcnobettermen *
than them which hauc profited m monafterieS) fo he lamcntcth that
he hath lecne no worfe men than thofe that difprofited m monafte-
hes.VVhat would he fay if at this day he faw all monaftcrics to fweJl,
& in a mancr to burft with To many & fo dtfpcired vicesri fpcake no-
thing but that which is well knowcn to all nicn.Yet doth not this dif-
praife pertame to all without any exception at all . For as there was
neucr rule & dtlliplme of liuinge holily fo ftabliihed in monafteries,
but that there remained Ibme dranes much vnhke the reft : foldo
not lay that mcnkes are at this day fo runnc out of kinde from that
holy antiquity, but that they haue yet fome good men in their flock.
But they lye hidden a few & fcattcrcd in y huge multitude of naughty
& wicked menrand they are not only defptfed,but alfo lewdly railed
at,& fomtimc cruelly handled of other, which(a$ the Milefians pro-
uerbe is ) thinke that there ought to be no place for any honelt man
among them.
16 By this comparifbnofthcoldc and prefent monkery, I truft I
haue brought to pjflc that which I purpofcd , that it may appearc
that our cowled menne do falfely prctende the example of the firft
Church for defence of their profemon : forafmuch as they no leiFc
dcftlr from them than apes from menne . In the meane time I ftickc
not to declare , that euen in that olde forme which Auguftine com-
mendeth , there is fomewhat which litle plcafeth me . I graunt that
they were not fuptrftitious incxadinge the outwardc cxercifcs of
rougher difciplme.but I fay that there watcdnottoo much aftedatio
and wror.geriil! zeal /.It was a goodly thinge/orfakinge their goods,
to be without all earthly carcfulncflc : but God more eftcemeth care
to rule a houfeholdc godlily , when a hcly houfeholder bcinge
loofc and free from all couetoufneflc , ambition , and other delir es
ofthcfledie, trauailcih toihis purpofe to ferue God in a certayne
vocation. It is a goodly thing to play the Philofopher in wildcrneflc
farre from the companie of men : but it agreeth not with Chriftian
genilencfle as it were for harrede of mankindcto flie into defcrte
androlicarincITe, and therewithal! to forfakethof- ducties which
the Lordc hath chitfely commaundcd . Although we griant that
there was no other euill in that profelTion,yet this verily w^s no fmall
euill , that it brought an vnprofitablc and pcrillous example mto the
Church
17 Nowe therefore lette v$ fee what maner of vowes they be,
wherewith monkcs at this day aic profcfled into this goodly order.
Firft,
ToSaluation. Lib.4, 530
pirft , bccaufe their minde is to inftitutc a new and Tained v/orfnip'
pingc to dcferue Gods fauour : I conclude by the rhaiges afoi e fpo-
ken that whatfoeucr they vowe is abhoniinable before God- Se-
condly without any rcga:dc of Gods calhnge,withoutany hss aiSo-
v/ance,they inucnt for them luch ;i kindc ot liuing as plcuicth chem
fclucs. I Cny that it is a raflie and chcicfore an vnLv/efull cntei prife:
becaufc their confcicnce hath nothinge whereupon it may vpholdc
it fclic before God,and whatfoeucr is notof faiih,is fmne. Moreo-
uer wiicn they binde chemfeiuci to many pcrueiTe and wicked vvor-
iLippingoS, which the monkery at this day containcthin it.I afFirme °'"'^4
thai they be not confecrjte to God, but to thcDeuill. For why was Dciuji.
it LiwcfuJl fci the Proplicte to fay , that the Iftaeliie? offere-l their - 7.
chiIircnrcDeuili3ndnottoGi>d:onely forthisthattliey had cor- P*^ *o6
rup 'id (.he true vvorlhippingeof God with prophaue Cereaiorfics: ^7-
and {\i2i\ It not be lawefuU for vs to fay the fame of monkcs , which
vvjth their cowlc do put vponthemfeiues a fnare of a choiifande wic-
ked fupcrftitions ? Nowe what fortes of vowes are ihcrc? 5 hiy pro-
nnfc to God perpetuall virginity , as though they hadde bargained
with God bcfore,that he ihouidedehucr them fioninccdc of ma- *
riagc, l^iicre is no caufe why they flioulde allcage , that they do not
make this vowe but truft;ngc vpon thcgraceof God.Forlith he pro- Mat.15)
ncimceih that he giueth it not co all mcn,it is not tn vs to conceiuca ' '•
conhdence of j fpeciall gift. Letce them ihat haue it, vfe n. If :*t any
time they fcelc thcmfclues to be troubled of their flelhejet them rtee
to rhis helpe by whofe oncly power they may rclUi if they preuaile
not, let them not dcfpife the rvmedy rhat ii ofFe:ed thcm.Foi they by
the certame worde ofGodarp called to mariage,to whom power of
continence is denicd.Contmence I call,no: wheicby the body is on - ».Cor. 7
ly kept cleane from whovcdome,but whereby the mindc kcpcth cha- ^*
ftity vndcfiled. For Paulc commaundcch not only outward vv.nuon-
ncfle , but alfo the burninge of the minde , to be auoided . This(iay
they ) hath from furtheft time of memory bin obferued, thattl.ey
which woulde dedicate themfelues wholly to the Lord,ihould bmdc
thcmfelucs to the vowe of continence. Igrauntin deedc that this
maner hath alfo bin of auncicnt time receiued : but I do not graunc
that that age was (bfrce from all faulte , that whatfoeucr was then
done muft betaken for a rule. Andby litleandlitle this vnjppeafea-
ble fcuenty crept in j that after a vowe made there was no roomc for
repcntance.Whichiseuident by Cipnan. If virgins haue of Faith de- Epift.n
dicatc themf:; lues to God, let them continue (hamefaftly, and chaftly
without any faining. So being ft;ong and ihdfnd let them lookc tor
XXX ij
>
Cap.i 3- Of the outward mcanes
the re warde of virginity . Buc if they will not or can not continue,
it IS better that they ftioulde mary than with their dcljghtes fall into
the fier. What rcproches would they now fpare to teare him withall,
that would with luch equity temper the vowe of continence?! here-
fore they ai e departed farre from that auncient manner, which will
not only admit no moderation or pardon if any be founde vnable to
pckforme his vowe.-bot they do without aUlliame pronounce that he
linneth more greuoufly if be remedy the intemperance of the fieflic
>vith takinge a wife , than if he defile both his body and foulc with
whoredome.
1 8 But they ftill enforce the matter , and go about tofhcv/e that
i.Tim.5 ^"^^ ^ ^°^^ ^^* ^^^^ *" ^^^ Apoftles time : bccaufe Paule fayth that
I ». the widowcs which hauing bm once receiucd into the Publikc mini-
ftery did mary, denied their firft Faith. But I do not deny to them,
that the widowes , which bounde themfeiues and their feruices to
the Churchjdid therewithal take vpon them the bonde of coniinu-
all vnmaricd life : not becaufe they rcpofed any religion therein, as ic
aft' rward began to be vfcd:but because they could not beare that of-
fice bui beinge at their owne liberty and loofe from yoke of marijgc.
But if; when they had once giuen their Faithjthey lokcd backe to ncvy
nitjrnges , Avhat was this clfe but to (hake of the callinge of God }
Therefore it is no maruell that with fuch defircs he fayth that they
waxe wanton againftChrift. Afterwarde to amplific the matter he
faithjthot they do fo not performe that which they haue promifed to
the Church, that they do alfo brcake and make voidc their firft Faith
ginen in Baptifmc : in which this is comprehended , that euery man
ihould anfwcrc his calling.VnlefFe parhap you had rather vnderftan4
itthus,thathai!ingas it were loft alfhame,they did from thenfe forth
caft awiy all care of honcfty, did giue foorth rhemfelues to all wan-
tonmfle and vnchaftity,and did in licentious and diCTolutel^rfe refem-
ble nothingc lelle than Chriftian womcntwhich fenfe I hi<e very welL
Therefore we aunfwere , that thofe widowes which were then rc-
ceiued to Pubhke miniftety,did lay vpon themfelues a bonde to con-
tinue vnnmriediif they afterward maried,we eafily percciue that that
happened to them which Paule fpeaketh of, that cafting away fhamc
they became more wanton than befemcd Chriftian wcmen.That Co
they not only finned , in hreakinge their Faith giuen to the Church,
but fwarucd from the common law of godly women. But firft I deny
that they did profeflc vnmaricd life for any other reafon, but bccaufe
mai i.ige aj^rced not with that miniftcry which they tooke in hande:&
X deny that they did binde themfelues at all to finale life ^ buc fo far as
the
To Saluation. Lib.4. 531
the ncccfTity of their vocation did bcarc. Againeldonot graunc
that they were fo boundjbut that it was rhcn alfo better for them to
maryjchan either to be troubled with the prickings of the flertijor to
fall into any vndeanncfle.Thirdly I fay that that aj^e is appointed of
Paul, which is commoly out of dangcrrfpccially (ith he comaundcth
them onely to be chofen > which contented with one marisge hauc
aJready (hewed a token of their continence. And we do for no other
reafon di fallow the vow of vnmaricd lifc,but bccaufc it is both wt5g-
fully taken for a fcruice of God, & it is rafhly vowed of the to whom
power of continence is not giuen.
19 Buthowwasitlawful to draw this place of Paulc to Nunnes?
For there were created dcconifl'es, not to delite God with finging &
with mumbling not vnderftsindcd,and liue the reft of their time idle:
but that they ihould execute publikc miniftration toward the poore,
th It rhcy fliouU with all ftudy,carnertneire, and diligence, endeuour
ihefclues to the ductics of charity.They did not yowc vnmaricd life,
to yeelde thereby any worfhip to God becaufe they abftained from
manage :but only becaufethey weretherby the more vncombrcdto
execute ihcir office. Finally they did nor vowe if,cither in the begin-
ningc of their youthjOr yet in : he middeft of their flowinge age, that
they might afterward learne too late by experience into how great a
hcadlonge downe fall they had throwcn themfelues:but when ihcy
fecmed to haue paffed all danger, tha they vowed a no lefle fafe than
holy vowe. Bot(iiot to enforce the firft two pointes) 1 fay it was not
lawefull to haue women recciued to vowe continence before the age
of three fcore yearcs : forafmuch as the Apoftle admitteth onely wo^*
men of 60. yeares oldc , and comraaundeth the yonger to mary and
brin J forth children.Therforc neither that releafc made of 1 z.ycres,
& then 20.& afterward of thirty yearcs, can be any way excufcd.and
much lefle is it tolerable , that filly maides , before that they can by
age know themfelues, or hauc any experience of ihcmfeluc$,are noc
only trained by fraudc, but coftraincd by force & threatnings to put
on thofc curfcd fnarcs. I will not tary vpon confutinge the other two
vowcs. Only this I fayibefide this that they be entangled with not a
few fuperftitions, (as the matter is now a daies)they feme to be made
to this purpofc, that they which vow the Hiould mocke both God &
men.But leaft we {hould feme too malicioufly to fhske vp euery fmall
parcelljWe will be content with that gcnerall confutation which is a-
boue Cct.
20 What manner ofvowes be lawefull and acceptable to God , t
thinkc is TuiBcicntly declared . Vet becaufc fometimc vnskdfuU an4
XXX iij
Cap. 1 3 . Of the outward meancs
fearcfull confcitnces » eucn when they rmflike or difalowany vowe,
do n':uenhelc!Te doucof the binding,and are grcuoufly tormented,
when they bo:h drede to breake their Faith giuen to God , & on the
ochcrHde they fearelcaftthcy fhould more (innc in keeping inhere
they are lo be fiiccoiiredjthat they may winde thcmfelues out of this
dirtreiTe. But,tot?.ke away all doucntonce:! (ay that all vowes being
not lawfuljnor r»ghtly made,as they are nothing worth before God,
fo ouuht to be vojde to vs . For if in contraftes of men thofe promi-
fes oneh' do binde, in which he with whom we contrad would haue
vs bounde:!t is an sfurdiry, that we fliould be driuen to the keepingc
of thofcthmsivS which God doth noc require of vs:rpeci3Uy (ithour
workes are no othcrwife rigbt,but wlicn they plcafe God,and whca
confciences haue this teihmonie that they pleafe him . For ihb re-
Rom 14 maineth certaine,whatfocucris not of Fiith,is (inne. Whereby Paul
^^* meaneth , that the worke which is taken in hande with doutmge , is
therefore fiuity , bccaufe Fayi h is the rootc of all good workes , by
whic!) we arc aOitrcd thatthev be acceptable to God.Thcrcforc if it
be lavvfull for a Chriftian man to go about nothinge without this aC*
furednes:! ' by fault of ignorance ihcy haue taken any thing in hand,
whv (houlde rhev not afterward erue itouer when they be dcliuered
from errours.Suh vowes vnad-vJifcdly made are fuch, they do not on-
ly nothin :c bmdejbut are neceflarily to be vndone. Yea what if ihcy
are not Oficly nothing eftemrd^hut alfo arc nbhominable in the fighc
of God, as is aboue i"hewed?Ir is neddeffe ro difcourfe any longer of
a matter not needefuU . This one artiument feemeth to me to be e-
nough to pacific godly confciences and deliuer them from all dout:
that wh-itfoeucr wotkcs do notflowe out of the pure fountainc & be
no: direded to the lawfull end, arc refufed of Godrand fo rcfufed thnt
he no !i (Te forbiddeth vs to go forwarde in them , than to beginnc
them. For hereupon followeth, that thpfe vowes which proccedc of
crrour and fuperftition , are both of no value before God , and to be
forfakcnafvs,
2 T Morcoucr he that fhall know this folution , fliall haue where-
with he may defcnde againft the fc launders of the wicked , them that
depone from monkery 10 fome honeft kinde of life . They arc gre-
uouOy KCtifed of breache of Fayth and periury , becaiife tl>ey haue
broken (is it is commonly thought) the infoluble bondc wherewith
they were boundc to God and to the Church . But I fay that there
was no bondc, where God doth abrogate that which ma confir rocth.
Morcouer, admittinge that they were bounde, when they were hoi"
den entangled with not knowinge of God and with crrour : now fincc
they
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 532
they are lightened with the knowledge of the trueth , I fay that they Gal.j.f
arc therwichallficc by the grace of Chnft. For if the croflTc of Chnft
hauc fo great cffeftualneflc , that it ioofeth vs from the curfc of the
Ijwe of God , wherewith we were holden bonde, howe much more
(hall it deliucr vs from foreine bondes , which are nothinge but the
fnaringe nettcsof Satan? To whomfoeuer therefore Chnft fliincth
with the light of his Gofpell, it is no dout that he loofcth them from ^
all fnares which they hadde pat vppon ihemfelues by fuperftition,
H Jwebcit they want not yet an other defenfe, if they were not fit to
hue vnmaried.For if an impoiTible vowc be a fure dcftnidion of the
fbule , whom the Lorde woulde haue faued and not dcftroyed : it fo-
loweth that we ought not to continue therein. But howe impoffiblc
is the vowe of continence to them that are not endaed with a fiagu-
Lir ^ift , we haue already taught, and experience fpeaketh it chough t
holde my peacc.For neither is it vnknowcn with howe great filthmes
almoft all monafteries do fwarme. And if any of them feme honefter,
and more flumefaft than the reft : yet they are not therefore chaft
becaufc diey fupprefle and keepe in the fault of vnchaftity. So verily
God doth with horrible examples take vengeance on the boldcncflc
of men, which forgcttingethdrowne weakenefle,doagainft nature
couetthat which is denied them,and defpifinge the remedies which
the Lord hid giuen them at hande , do truft that they can with ftub-
bornncfle and obftinacy ouercome the difeafe of incontinence . For
what elfc fliall we call it but ftubbornefte , when one beingc warned
that he needeth mariagc, and that the fame is giuen him of the Lord
for a remedy , dorh nor onely defpife it , but alfo bindeth himfelfe
with aa oth to the defpi^ng of it>
The xiii j. Chapter.
OfSacramentes,
BEfidc the preaching of the Gofpclljan other help of like forte
is in the Sacramentes:of which to haue fome certainc doftrine
taughtjis much behouefull for vs,wherby we may learnc both
to what cnde they were ordained , and what is now the vfc of
them. Firftitis mectc to confidcr what is a Sacrament. It fecmeth to
me that this ftialbe a plaine and proper definition,if we fay that it is
an outward figne,wherwith the Lord fcaleth to our confciences the
promifes of his good wil towaird vs,to fuftaine the weakenefte of oue
Fai th : & we againe on our behalues do teftiHe our godlinelTe toward
him as well before him and the Angels as before men. Wc may alfo
XXX iiij
Cap.14. of the outward mcancs
with more bricfcneJBTc define it othcrwife : as to call it a teflimony of
Gods fauour toward vs confirmed by an outward figne,with a mutu-
al certifying of our godlinrs toward him.Whetherfoeucr you choofc
of thcfc definuionSjit differeth nothing in fcnfe from that definition
of Auguftine , which tcacheth that a Sacrament is a vifiblc figne of a
holy thingjor a vifible forme of inuifibie gracc-.but it doth better and
more certamly exprcfie the thing it felfe. For whereas in that briefc-
nells there is ibmedarkenes, wherinmany of the vnskilfullerfort arc
dcceiuedj thought good in moc words to giue a fuller fcntcnccthat
there fliould renjaine no dout.
z For what rcafon the olde wryrers vM this word in that fcnfcit
is not hard to fee. For fo oft as the old cravifl.tter would render in La-
, tine this Greeke word Myfterion myftcrie, fpecially vvhc diuinc mat-
Tii^ ters were entreated of, he trsnflated it Siacramenc.So to the Ephcfi-
ans. That he might make knowen vnto vs^thc Sacrament of his will.
Againe, if yet ye hauc heaide the diftribution of the grace of God*
which is giucn to me in youjbecaufe according to rcuelation the Sa-
rdo. T. crnment was made knowen xo me . To the Coloffims, The myftery
6. which hath bin hidden from ap,e« and gencrations,butnow is mani-
.Tirn. I fefted to his Saintes , to whom the Lord would make knowen the ri-
*• chefleof this Sacramct.&c.Agame to Timothce,A great Sacrament
of godhneifeiGodis openly fhewedin the fle(he. He would not fay a
(ecretjleaft he ibould (eeme to fay fomwhac vnder the greatnes of the
things.Thereforc he hath pur Sacrament in ftcdc of Secrer,but of a
holy thing. In that (igntfication it is fomtime founde among the cc-
clefiafticall wrytcrs. And it is well enough knowcn,that thole which
in Latine are called Sacraments, in Greeke are Myltrries : which ex-
prcflingofone thing in two fcuerall words endcth all thccontcntio.
And hertby it came to paflfe that it was drawe to thofe figncs which
had a reuerende reprefentation of hie and fpirituall tiiinges. Which
, .„ Auguftine allonotethin one place.Itwcrciong(faiihhe)todifputc
d Mar* of ^1^^ diuerfity of fignes,which when they pereeine to diuine things,
tl. are called Sacramcntes.
I Now of this definition which we haue fct, we vnderftandc that
a Sacrament is neuer without a promife going before it,but rather i$
adioyncdasa certaine addition hanginge to it, tothis endc thatic
(houlde confirme and fealc the promife it felfe,and make it more ap-
proued vnto vs,yca after a certaine maner ratified. Which meane the
Lorde forefeeth to be needefuU firft for our ignorance and dallnefTe,
and then for our weakenefle : and yet ( to fpeakc properly ) not (b
much to coriHrme his holy word,a$ to ilabliih vs in the Fay th theroF.
For
To Saluation. Lib.4. 533
For the truth of God is by it felfc founde and ce. taine enough, and
can not from any other where receiue better cofii mation t' .an from
i: felfe.B'jt our Faith, as it is fmal and weake , vnlefle it be ftayed on
cuery fi Je.and be by all meanes vpholden,is by and by fljaken,wauc-
reth , ftaggercth , yea and fainteth. And herein verily the mercifull
Lorde according to his great tender kindnedc tempereth i/imfelfc
to our capacitie : that , whereas we be naturall men , which alway
creping vpon the grounde and fticking faft in the flcrh,do not thinkc
nor fo much as conceiue any fpirituail thing , he trouchcfaueth cucn
by thefe earthly elements to guide vs vnto himfelfc , and in the flcfli
it felfc to fet foorth a mirror of fpirituail s^ood thmgs. For if we were
vnbodily (as Chryfoftomc faith) he would hauc e;eucn vs the very Homel,
fime things naked and vnbodily. Nowe becaofe we haue foules put *"• ^"*
within bodies , he geucth fpirituail things vnder vifiblc thmgs. Not " ^ '
bccaufe there arefuch giftes planted in the natures of the thmgs
which arc fct foorth to vs in the Sacraments : bat becaufe they were
finned by God to this fignification.
4 And this is it which they comonly fay, that a Sacrament con-
(illcthofthe word and the outward (I'^ne. For wcmuft vnderlbndc
the worde to be , not that which being whilpered without meaning
and Faith, with onely noife as it were with a magicall cnchauncment
hath power to confccrate the element :lnit which being preached
makcth vs to vndeiftande what the vifible figne meaneth.Thercforc
that which was vfually done vnder the tywannie of the Pope, was
not without a great profaning of the miftcries. For they thought ic
inough,ifthe Pricft, while the people ftodc am.ifedly gazin j; at it
without vnd'^rftandingjdid mumble vp the forme of cofecration.Yea
they offer pu'.pofe prouidedtliis , that no whit of doctrine fhould
thereof come to the people ; for they fpake all things in Latine be- v.j
fore vnlearned men. Afterwarde fuperftition brake out fo farre,that ^
they belcued th^ the confecration was not formally madCjVnleiTe ic
were with a hoarfe whifpering founde which fcwemight hearc. Bur
Augudine teacheth farre odierwifeof thcSacramentall word. Let Hom,i«
the word (faith lie) be added to the element, and there flialbe made [^^'* ^'
a Sacramenr. For whenfe.cometh this fo great ftrength to the v/ater,
to touch the body and wafhe the foulc , but by the word making it?
• not becaule ic is fpoken,but becaufe it is beleued. For in the very Roni,i(o
word ic fcif's the founde which paffeth is one thing , and the power ?•
which ahideth is another. This is the worde of Faith v/hich wc ^^'^S<
preach, fnirh the Apoft'c. Whereupon in the Adcs of the Apoftles f p
it ii faid,by f dth deanfing their hartcs. And Peter the Apoftk faith. 2',,
Cap.14. Of the outwardc meancs
So Bapttfnc alfo faucth vs: not the putting away of y Hithines of the
flcfhjbut the cxaminatio of a good colciencc.lhisisy worciofFaith
which we prcach;by which without «Jout,y itmay.be aUe to clen(c,
Baptifmcalfois haiowed.You fc howe itrcquircthprcaching,whcr-
vpon Faith may grow. And wc nccde not to trauaile much in profc
hereof, forafmuch as it is dcre what Chnft did , what he commaun-
ded vstodojwhatthc Apoftlcs followed , what the purer Church
obfcrucd. Yea eucn from the beginning of the world it is knowcn,
that fo oft as God offred any figne to the holy Fathers , there was
added an vnfeparable knot of dodrine , without which our lenfcs
ihould be made amafcd with bare beholding. 1 here fore when we
heare mention made of the Sacramentall word, let vs vndci ftand the
promife, which being with a loude voice preached <jf the miniftcr
may leade the people thether as it were by the handc , whether the
li^nc tendeth and dircdeth vs.
5 Neither are (omc to be heard which trauaill to fight a^ainft
ihiSjWuh a double horned argument rather futtle than founde. Either
(fay they) wcknowe.orwe knowenot, that the word of God which
gocth before the Sacrament, is the true will of God. If wc know it,
ihcnwclearnc no new thing of the Sacramec which fulloweth after.
If we knowe it not , then neither will the Sacrament teach it , whocs
whole force ftandcth in the word. Whercunto let this brefely be for
an aunfworc : that the feales which are hanged at patcntes and other
pubijkc inftrumcnts, taken by themfclucs are nothing, forafmuch
as they fhould be hanged in vainc if thcparchcmcnt hadnot' ing
written in It: yet they do not therefore not confirme and lealc that
which IS written, when they be added to writings. Neither can they
Rom.4. ^3y ^^3*^ this (imilitudc is lately faincd by vs, which Paule himfelfe
II. vied, calling Circumcifion a fealc , where hcpurpofcly irauaileth to
proue,tha£Circumci(ion was notrighteoufnefle to AbraKam, but a
fcilmg. of that couenauntc , by faith whereof he Iv^d already bene
iuftificd before. And what, 1 befcch you, is there that may much of»
fende any m3ii,if wc teach that the promife is fealed with Sacramets,
whenofthepromifes thcmfelues it is euident that one is confirmed
with an other? For as euery one is maniufterjfo is it more fir to
vpholde faith. But the Sacramets do both bring moft clere promifes»
and haue this peculiar more than the word , that they liuely rcprc-
fcnt them to vs as it were painted out in a tabic. Neither ought ihac
diftindion any thing to moue vs, which is wont to be obieded , be-
iwccncSacraments and feales of patentcs : that whereas both confifl
of carnall dements of this world>thorc can not fuffice 01 be mete tc»
feal^
To Saluation. Lib,4, 534
fcalc the promiles ot God , which are fpintuall and cucrl.-.fting, is
thcfc arc won: to be hanged to»for fealing of the oraunts ot Princes
concerning fading and frailc things. For a faithfull man, when the
Sacraments arc prefcntc before his eyes , fticketh not in that flc(hly
fii;ht,but by thofe degrees of proportion,\vhich I hauc Spoken of,hc
nifcth vp with godly colidcration to the hy miftencs which lie bidden
in the Sacrarr^cnts.
6 And (ich the Lordc cnllcth his proirdfcs, couenanres : and his Oen. tf.
Sacraments, feales, ofcoUL-nanres lafimiliiude may well be brought ***• *"^
from the couenatcs of mm What can a fowe killed worke, ifwordes fl^,*,
were not vCcd , yea vnlefl":: they wente before } For fowes arc many
times killed Without anymore inwarde or hier mittcne. Whatcan
the gcuingof a mans right handc do,flth oftentimes handes are
matched with enm;ac? But when vvordes haue gone before, by fuch
(ignesthc lawes of leagues arc ftabliHied , although they v.'cre firft
conceiucdjmade,and decreed m wordes.Thercfore Sacraments arc
cxercifcs which makethecrcdit of the word of God ccrtainervnio
▼s:& becaufe we are carnall, they are deliucred vnder carnallchmgs:
that fo they fl^ould inftrud vs according.' to the capacitie of our dull-
nefie , and guide vs by the handc as fchoh maiftcrs guide children.
For this r^afon Au^uftsne callcth a Sacrament.a vjliblc word:becaufe In Toh.
it rcprefenteth the promifcsof God as it were painted in a table, !?^' °^^
and f. tteth them bcfv->re our fig'it conningly cxprcfTt d and as in an lj^,, ,
image. Other fimilitudcs alfo may be brought , whereby Sacraments coa.
may be more plainly fct out , as if we call them pillers of our Faith. Fautt*
For as a bildingftandetlj and rcft.?t?i vpon the fundatio:yet by fttnng
vnder of pillcrs , it is more furely ftabhihed : lo : Faith reftcth ."pon
the word of God , as vpon a funduion : but when Sacraments arc
added, it ftaieth yet morcfoundly vpon them a^ vpponpillers. Or if
we call them loking glaflcs , in which we may beholdc the richefTe
of the grace of God , w]iich he geueth vs. For ( as wc haue already
faid) he doth in them manifeftly ihewe himfelfe lo vs , fo much as is
geuen to our dullneffc to knowe , and doth more cxprefiely leftific
his good will and loue toward vs than by his word.
7 N-ither do they reafon fittly enough to the purpofc,whcn
thcv labor to proue hereby that they are not teftimonics of the grace
of Godjbecaufe they are alfo geuen to the. wicked, which yet do
thereby feie God nothing more fauourabic to ihem,but rather pro-
cure to themi'eiucs more greuous damnation. For by the fame argu-"
nacnt neither fhould the Gofpell, which is heard and defpifedof
smny, hz the tcftimony of chc grare of God : nor yet Chrifl himfeif»
Cap.14. of the outwarde mcancs
which was feen and knowen of many , of whom very fewc receiued
him. The like wc may alio fe inpatentcs. For agreateparteofthc
* mulcituJe laugheth at and fcorneth that authcntike fealcjhowfoeuer
ihcy knowe that it procedcd from the Prince to feale his will withalh
(bmc regard e it not , as a thing not pcrteining to ihem : fome ai(6
abhorre it : fo t'ut cofidcring this fo cgall relation of both)ihat fame
iimjlitudc which I haue aboue vfed, ought more and more to be
likcd.Thercfore it is ccrtaine that the Lord doth offer vnto vs mercy
and a pledge of his grace both in his holy word and intheSacra-^
ments : but the fame is not receiucd but of them which receiuc the
word and Sacraments with fure Faith : like as Chritt is offrcd of the
Father vnto faluatio, to all,yet he is not acknowledged and receiucd
of all. Auguftine in one place minding to declare the fame, faid that
the cffedualncfTc of the word is (hewed foorth in the Sacramcnt;not
becaule it is fpoken^but becaufe it is beleued. Therefore Paule,when
Gala.}, hcfpekeihtothefaithfull.fo entreateth of Sacraments that htin-
a7. dudcth the communion of Chrift in them , as when he faith : ail ye
i.Cor thatareBaptifcdjhaueput onChrift. Againe,wcareallone body
**•'** and one Spirit, which are Baptifed in Chrift. But when he fpeaketh
of the wrongfull vfe of Sacraments , he geueth no more to it than
to colde and voidc figures. Whereby he fignifieth , that howfoeuer
th^^ wicked & hypocrites with their peruerfneflTe do either opprelfc
or darken or hinder the effeft of the grace of God m the Sacramers,
yet that withftandeth not but that where and foofccas; it plcafech
God, both they may bring a true teftimonie of the communicating
of Chrirt , and the Spirite of God himfclfc may deliucr and per-»
forme that which they promife.Wc determine therefore that Sacra-
ments are truely called teftimonies of the ?race of God , and as ic
were certainc feales of the good will which he bearcth toward vs:
which by fealing it vnto vs, do by this meane fufteine, nourifli, con-i*
firme,& cncrcafc our faith. As for the reafojis which fome arc wont
to obieA againft this fentencc , they are to trifling and wcakc. They
fay that if our Faith be good,it can not be made better : for they dy
that it is no Faith,but which without {hakin2;>ftedfaftly> and without
withdrawing, rcftethvppon the mercy of God. It had bene better
Iubi7. £qj. f^J^\^ (Q pray with the Apoftles that the Lordc would encrcafe
'* their Faith,than carelefly to pretede fuch a perfedion of faith,whichi
neuer any ofthc fonnesofmcn hathobteined,norany fhallob-
tcinc in this life. Let them aunfwcrjwhat maner of faith they thinke
Marc 9 ^^^^ ^^ ^^^ which faid : I bcleue Lordc , hcipe my vnbcleuingneffe.
34. For cuen that faith,howcfocuer it was but a begon faith, was a good
To Saluation. Lib.4. *^535
faith , and might be made better when vnbeleuingncffc were taken
away. But tliey arc confuted by no certainer argument than bythcir
owne conlcience. For if they conftifc thcmfelues finners , (which
whether ihey will or no they can not denie ) they mutt ncedcs im-
pute the fame to the impcrfedion of their faith.
8 But (f^y they ) Philip aunfwered the Eunuch , that he might A«,f.
bdijptizedjifhe bcleued with all his harfWhat place here hath the 37«
conHrmation of Baptifme,whcrc faith fillcth the whole hart? Agatnc
I a( kc them whether they do not fele a good parte of their hart void
of faith: whether they do not daily acknowledge ncwe encrcafcs.
The hcatlien manne gloried that he waxed olde with learning.Ther-
fore we Chrirtians be ihrifc mifcrable.if we waxe olde with profiting
nothing, whoes faith ought to go forwarde by all degrees of ages,
till it growe into aperfcdm.in. Therefore in this place to beleuc
with all the harr,i$ not perfedly to beleueChrift,butonely from the Eph'4«
hart and with afincereminde to embrace him: not to be full with *^'
him,but with fcruent affedion to hunger,&; thirft, and iigh towardt
him.This is the mancr of the Scripture, to fay that that is done with
ihe whole hart , which it mcaneih to be done (incerely and hartily. Pra.11^
Ofthisfottarethefefayings.Thaueinallmy hart fought thee: I will '^"*"5
confcfl'e to thee in all my hart , and fuch other. As on the other fide, , ,g ,^
where he rcbuketh guilefull and deccitfuU men , he vfeth to reproch H^,iu
ihem with hart and hart. Then they fay further, that if faith be en- }•
creafed by Sacraments, the Holy Ghoftis gcucn invainc whoes
ftrength and workc it is to begin , maintein , and make pcrfed faith.
To whom in decde I graunt,that faith is the propre and whole work
of the holy Ghoft ,by whom being enlightened we knowe God and
the treafure of his goodne(re,and without whoes light ourminde is
Co blindcjthat it can fee noihing,fo fenfleflTejthat it can fmeli nothing
of fpirituall things.But ftr one benehte of God which they fc? forth,
we confider three. For firttthc Lordc teacheth and inftruifteth v$
with his word : then he ftrcngtbeneth vs with Sacraments;la{t of all
he riiineih into our mindes with the light of his holy Spirit, & opc-
neth an eritric for the word and Sacraments into our hartes, which
otherwifc {hould but ftrikc our earcs,and be prefcnr before our eyes,
and nothing moue the inward partes.
9 Wherefore as touching the cofirmation and encreafc of faith,
I would haue the reader warned ( which 1 thinke I haue already in
plaine wordes exprcfled ) that \ do Co ^(Crinc thatminiftcrie to the
Sacramentcs , not as though I thought that there is perpetually in
them I woce not whatiecrct force,by which chcy may of themfelues
Cap.14. Of the outwarde mcancs
be able to further or confirme faith ; but becaufe they arc ordafncJ
oftht Lcide to this ende, that thcylhould fcrue to the ftabhihing
and cncreaiing of faith.But then oncly chcy do truly performe their
officc>whc-n chat inwarde fchoolcmaiftcf the Spirit is come to iherxi,
wich whoes onciy power both the haiies are pearccd, and affldions
are moucd , snd the cntrie is fee open for the Sacraments into our I
foalcs.lf he bu abiente , Sacraments can do no more to our mindes,
tlian if either the b. ightncflc of the funne (hould Thine vppon blinde
€yes,or a voice (oisndc to deafe earcs.'i hercfoxe I fo make diuilxon
bctwcenc the Spirit and facramentSjthat the power of workinge rc-
m:iine with the fpiric , and to the Sacrsments be left onely the mini-
ftration, yea and the fame voide and trifling without the working of
the fpint : but of much eftVOualnelTe, when he inwardly worketh &
puttcth fori h his force* Nowe n is plai.ie in what forte according to
this fentcnce,a godly minde is confiimed in the faith by Sacraments;
that IS to fay,eucn as the eyes fet by the brightnefle of fhe funncand ^
the earcs hcare by the founde ot a voice : of which neither the eyes
fhould any whit pcrcciue any light , vnlelfe they had a fight in theni-
fciucs that might naturally be enlightened: and the eares fliould in
vaine be knocked at witii any crying whatfoctier it vvere,vnlcfie they
were naturidly made and fit to heai e. But *f it be true , which ought
at ones to be determined among vs , tliat what the fight worketh in
our eyes to feing of the light,what the hearing worketh in our eares
to the pcrcciLiingofa voicc,die fame is the worke of the holy Ghcft
in our hartes, both to the c6nceiuing»&; fuftcinn^g , and cheriihing
andftablifliing of faith : then both thcfe things do hkewife fcliowe:
that the Sacraments do nothing at all profite v/ithout the power of
the holy Ghcft: and that nothing wi:hftandcth butthit in hartes
already taught of that fcholemaiOer , they may m:ike faith both
ftiongerand more enereafed.Onely this difference there iSjthat the
power of hearing and feing is naturally ict in our cares and eyes:but
Chiift bcfide the mcafure of nature doth by fpeciall grace worke
the fame m our mindes.
10 Whereby thofc obiedions alfo , which comber 'fomc men,
are difiTolucd : That if weafcribe to creatures either the encreafe or
confix'-mation of faith, there is wscngedone to the Spirit of God,
whom we ought to acknowledge the only author therof.For neither
do we in the mcane time take from hin the praife either of con-
firming or cncreafing it : bm rather we affirme,that euen this that he
cncrC'ifeth and confirmeih faith , is nothing els but with his inward
cnlighming 10 prepare our mindes to rccsiuc that confirming which
is fc c
To Saluadon. Lib4. 53^
is fct forth by the bacramcnis. But if it be yet to darkly fpoken , it
(hilUc made very clere by a fimilirude which I will bring. If rhoa
p Jipoic With wordes to pcrfuade a man to do any thing, thou wilt
itarch out all the rcafons , whereby he may be drawcn to thv opt-
Dion, and may be in a mjner lubdued to obey thy counTcll.But thou
hart hetherco n".>thing preuailcd , vnlefTe he likcwifc haue a pearcmg
and'haipe luJgcment, whereby he may wcyc what pith is in thy
realbns : vnltHe alio he haue a tradable wit and ready to harkcn to
tcachin^r finally vnlefTe he haue conceiued fuch an opinion of thy
faith^ulncfTe and wifedome , as may be to him like a certainc Forc-
iu :t^cmcnt tocnufc him to lubfcrxbc. For both there are many (lub-
boiiiehcadsjwhich a man canneucr bowe with any reafonsiand alio
V'here crcdue is fufpeded, where auihoritie is defpifed, litdc good is
donecticn with the willing to leatne. On theociieriidcletallthofc
things be prelcnt , they will truely bring to paflc that the hearer , to
whom thou geucftcounfclljWill obey the felfe fame counfcls which
otherwifr he wouid'haue laughed to fcornc. The fame worke alfo
the Spirit woiktthin vs. For leaft the word fhould bcate oureaies
in v.ime Jeill the Sacramentcs fiiould ftnkc our eyes in vainc , he
ihewcih vs that it is God which fpcaketh therein , he foftencththe
ftubborncile of our heart, and frameth it to the obedience which is
due to the word of the Lorde. Finally he conueycih thofe outward
wordes and Sacramentcs from the cares into the foule. Therefore
boih the word & the Sacraments do confirme our faith, whe they fet
before our eyes the good will of the heauenly father toward vs,by
knowledge of whom both the whole iicdfaftneffe of our fjith ftaii-
deth f^U, and the fti ength of it encreafeth : the Spirit confirmeth it,
when \n en ;rauing the fimc contirmation in our mindcs he makcth
it eftf duc^ll. In the meane time the father of lightes can not be for-
bidden , but as he eniightncth the bodily eyes with the beames of
the funne, fo he may enlighte our mindes with facraments,as with a
brighmeife fet meane betweene.
1 1 Which propj^etie the Lorde tau?ht that there was in his out- Mat jj*
warde word,when in the parable he called it fcede. For as fecde,if it 4.
fall vpon a defert and vntilled pcecc of grounde,wi!l do nothing but ^"'•**
die.but if it be t<irowen vpon arable landc well manured and tilled, ' ^*
it will bring forrh her fruit with very good encrcafc ; fo the word of
God, if It ligh: vpon aftiffe necke,itvvillgrowebarrein as that which
is fowen vpon fande : but if it light vpon a fouic m.mured with the
handc of the heauenly Spirit , it will be moft fruitefull. But if there
be like reafon of fcedc and of tlic word : as we fay thai out of fccde
Cap. 1 4. Of the outward meanes
cornc boch fpringcth and cncreafcrh , and growcth vp co ripenefTc:
why may vvc nor fay that faith takcth out of the word ofGodboth
bcginningjcncreare,and pcrfedion. l*aulc very weilexprcflech both
thefe tbjiigs m fundi y places. For when he goeth about to put the
I. Cor. Connthi:Uii jn rcmcnibracc hov/e ctfcdually God vfed his crau^ile,
••4 he gloricih rhac he h.ith the nuniftene of the Spirit , as though the
,^^^' power at y holy Ghoft were with an vnfeparabic knot joined with
* * his preaching, to enhghtcnand thoroughly moue the mindc. But in
an other place when he mindeth to admonifh them , of what force
I. Cor. the word oi God is of it Telfe being preached by man,he compareth
S*6« ihcminiRers ihcmiciues to huibandmen, which when they hauc
bcftowed their labor and trauaile in tilUng the earth , haue no more
to do.But what fhould tijling,and rowino,and watering profit, vnlcffc
that which is fowcn (houldrcceiuc liuclineffe by heauenly benefice?
Therefore he concludeth, that both he that planteth and he that
watereih are nothing ; but that all things are to be afcribed to God>
which aloncgeueth theencreafe.Therefore the ApoHles do in their
preaching vttcr the power of the Spirit, fofarrc as God vfcth the
inftrumcms ordeincdby himfelfto the fettitig forth of his fpirituaU
gracc.Yet wc muft kepe ftill that diftindion,th3t we rcmembre,whas
man is able to do by himfelfe, and what is proprc to God.
1 z Sacraments are Co cofirmations of our faith, that many times
when the Lordemeanech to take away the confidence of the very
things that are by him promifed in the Sacraments , he takcth away
the lacraments thcmfelues. When he fpoileth and thrullethaway
Cenef. ^'^^^ from the gifte ofimmortahtic, he faith : Let him not eate of
j.^. the fruitof iife,lcalt he lius for cuer.Whac faith he.'CouId that fruit
rcftorc to Adam his vncorruption , from which he was nowe fallen.
No. But this is all one as if he had faid:Leaft he fhould enioy a vamc
confidence if he kepe ftdl the lt8;ne of my promife, let that be fhakcn
away from h'm which migh: bring him fome hope of immortalitie.
Bphes. After this maner when the Apoftlc cxhorteth the Ephehans tore-
i». mcmbre that they were forein p^eftes of the tcftamenrs ,ftrangcrs
from the fcllowfhip of rfraelljWithoutGod,without Chrift,hc faith,
that thev were not partakers of Circumcifion.Whereby he dorh(by
figure of tranrnominanon) lignifie that they were excluded from
the promife it fclfe,which had not receiued the figne of the promife.
To their other obiedion,that the glory of God is conucyed to crea-
tures, to whom fo much power is afct ibcd , and that thereby it is fo
farreditrtiniilied , we haucin redinclTe to aunfwere thatwcfet no
power m creatures. Oncly this wc lay , that God vfeth mcafnes and
To Saluation. Xib4. 537
inftrumcnts,which he himfelfc feeth to be expedient : th.it all things
may ferue his gloiicjtbrafmuch as he isLordc and ludgc ot ail.Ther-
fore as by bread and other ncunflimenis he tcedeth our body : as by
the funnc he enliglitncth the world: as by fire he warmcth : yet
neither bread, nor the funne, nor fire , arc any thinge but To farre as
by<hofc inftrumcnrs he doth diftnbuie his bJeiTings vnto vs :forpi-
ritually he nourifhcth faith by the Sacramcnts,whore oncly office is
to fet his proraifes before our eyes to be iokcd vpS^yea to be pledges
vnto vs of them. And as it is our duccic to fjiften none of our affiance
in ot!]cr creatures,\vhich by the liberality and bountifulncfle of God
are ordeined to our vfcs,aiid by the miniftery whereof he geucth vs
liis giftes, nor to haue them in admiration>and praife them as caufes
of our good : fo neither ou.:ht our confidence to fticke f aft in the ^a-
cramtnts , nor the glotie of God to be remoued vnto thcm;but Ica-
uing all thingSjboch our faith and confeflion ought to ufe vp to him
the author both of the facramcnts and of all things.
1 5 Whereas fome bring an argument out of thde very name of a
Sacramencjit is nothing ftrong. A facrament (fay they) whereas it
hath among allowed authors many lignifications , yet it liath but one
which agreeth with the ii-p.cs : that is, whereby itfipnifi<;th thatfo-
lemne othe which the foldior makerh to his capitaine when hcen-
trech into profeflio of a foldior.For as by that o:hc ot warfare ncwc
Ibldiors do bindc their faith to the capit.iine , and profefle to be his
foldiors ; fo by our (ignes we profeffc Chnft our c?p.itaine , and do
teftific that vvc ferue vndcr his banner. They adde similitudes to
make chetby the matter more plaine. As a gownc made the Remains
feuerally knowen from the Grekes which did weare dokes : as the
vei y degree* of men at Rome were difcc rncd by their feucral fignes:
the degree of Senators from the degree of knightes, by purple cote
and piked fliooes : againc a knight from a commoner , by a ring : fo
wc beare our fignes that may make vs feuerally knowen from pro-
phanemcn. But by the things aboue faid it is euident enough that
the olde writers , which gaue to the fignes the name of Sacraments,
haddc noregardc howe this word was vfed among Latine writers,
but for their owne purpofe famed this ncwc fignification, whereby
they fignified onely holy Signes. Butif wc wiUfearche the matter
more dcpely, it may feeme that they haue with the fame relation ap-
plied this word to fuch a fi^nificatio, wherewith they haue remoued
the name of faith to that fenfe wherein it is nowe vfed. For whereas
faith is a rruth in performing promifes : yet they haue called faith an
afifurcdiieiTe^or furc perfuafion which is hadof the truth it felfe.Likc**
YYY
Cap. T 4- Of die outwarde meanes
wife whereas a facrament is the foldiors part whereby he vowcth
himrelfe CO his capitainerthey hauc made it the capitaines parte,
whereby he receiueth foldiors into roomes of fcruice. For by the fa-
crament the Lordc doth promifc that he will be our God , and that
we (hall be his people.But we pafle ouer fuch futtletiesrforafmuch as
Ichinkel haoe proued with arguments plaine enough, that they
hadde rcfpeft to nothing ck but to fignific that thcfe are Signcs of %
holy and (pirituall things. We recciuc in deedc the fimilitudcs which
they bring of outward tokens ; but we allowe not that that which is
the laft pointe in the facramentSjis by them fet for the chief yea and
ondy thing.But this is the firft point,that they fhould fcruc our faith
before God : the later point that they (hould teftifie our confeffion
before men. According to this later conlideration thofe fimihtudes
liaue place. But inthemeane time let that firft point remaine : bc-
caufe otherwife ( as we hauc already proued) the miftcries fhould bt
but coldcjvnicffc they were helpcs to our faiih,and additions to doe*
trine ordcined to the fame vfe and ende.
14 Againe wc muft be warncd,that as thcfc men do weaken the
force, and vtterly ouerthrowe the vfe of facraments : foon the con-
trarie fide there be fome, which faine to facraments,! wotc not what
fecret vertues , which arc no where red to be put in them by God.By
which error the fimple and vnfkilfull are dangeroufly deceiucd,
while tHey a^e both taught to fekc the giftes of God where they can
not be founde , andare by little and little drawcn away from God, to
embrace mere vanitie in fteedeof his veritic. For the Sophifticall
fchooles hauc taught with great confcnt, that the Sacraments of the
newe lawe,that is to fay thofe which arc nowc in vfe in the Chriftian
Church , do iuftifie and geuc grace, Co that we do not lay a ftoppe of
deadly finne. It can not be exprefled howe pernicious and peftilent
this opinion is,and fo much the morc,becaufc in many ages hereto-
forcjto the great loffe of the Church it hath prcnailcd in a great part
of the world: Trucly i^: is vtterly deuelifh. For when it promiierh
righteouftieire without faitb,it driueth fouks hedlong into deftrudio:
then becaufe ir fetcheth the caufe of righteoufneflc from the facra-
ments,itbindech chemifcrable mindes of men already of their ownc
accorde to much bending totlie earth, with this fuperftirio that they
rather reft in the fight of a bodily thing than of God himfelfe.Which
two things I would to God we had not fo proued in experience , fo
little neede they any long profc.But what is a facramct taken without
faithjbut the moft certaine defti udion of the Church .<■ For whereas
nothing is to be lokcd for thereof without the protnife^and the pro-
mife
To Saluation. Lib.4. 538
tnife dothnolefle threaten wrath to the vnfauhfull,thanit ofticth
grace to the faithful! : he is dectiucd th.it thinketh that there is any
more gcucn to him by the faci nmcnts , than that whici) being offied
by the word of God,he rccciutch by tauh.Whcrupon an ocher thing
ah'^o IS gathered, that the affiance of r.luation hangethnot vponihc
partaking of the racranjt:nt,as ihough iulhtication confiftcd therein:
which we knowe to be repoftd in Chrill onrly , and to be commu-
nicated vntovsnoleffeby the preaching of the Go(pcll,than by ihc
fe.ilmg of the facrament : and that without that it can not wholly
ft?nde. So true is that which Auguftinealfo writcth, that inuifiblc fibr.4
fandincation may be without a vifible figne,and againe that a vihblt- n*^ ^"'^'
fi.^ne may be without true fandiHcation. For (as he alfo writcth in an tci^am.*
other place,) men do put on Chtift fometimc vntill the reccimn^ of J.ibr. s.
a facrament, fometime euen vntiUthe fandification of life. And that "<^ bap.
fir ft point may b:: common both to good and to emll ; but this other J^**"^"*
is propie to the good and godly. ^^' ^ '
15 Hereuponcomcth thatdiftin<Sionif itbewellvnderftanded,
which {he fame Auguftine hath often noted , betweene a facrament,
and the thing of the facrament. For it not onelyfignificth, that the
figure and truth are there conteincd , but that they do not io hang
together but that they miy be feuered : and that euen in the very
conioming the thing muft alway be difccrned from the fignc,that wc
geuc not to the one that which belongeth to the othcr.He fpeakah
of the fcparation, when he writeth that the facraments do worke m
the onely cled that which they figure. AL=.aine,when he writeth thus ocbap.
of the lewes : When the facraments were common to ali, the grace P^nui
was not common, which is the power of the facrament*:. Sonowe *" P **"
alfo thewa(hing of regeneration is common to all : but t! e t;race
it felfe, whereby the mcmbres ofGhrift are regenerate with their
lied, is not common to all. Againe man other place of the Supper ^n ToK
of the Lordc, We alfo at this day receiue vifible meate.But ihe facra- ^f'"'^*-
mem is one thing , and the power of the facrament on other thin^:. *
What is this , that many receiue of the al-ar and dy, and in receiumg^
dody ?FortheLordes morfell waspoifonro Tudns : not becaule he
recciuedan cuell thing, but becaufc he being euell recciucd ai^ood
thing euclly.A httle after- The facr^iment of this thtngj that is of the
vnitie of thcbody and blood of Chrift, is fomevvhf^re prepared on
the Lordcs table daily ,fomewhcre by ccrtainc dillances of dayestaod
thereof is rcceiucd vnto life to fome, and vnro deftru<^ion to fome.
But the thing it felfe whereof it is a ficrament , is receiued vnto life
CO ail men, but f mo defti udion to no man , whofocuer is part^kct of
YYY ij
Cap. 1 4- Of the outwardc meancs
it. And a litclc before he had faid , He fhall not 6y which eatcth : bnc
he which pcrtcineth to the power of the facramencnot to the vifiblc
facrament : which eateth within, not without : which eateth with
hai t,not he which prelTeth with tooth.Thus you heare eucry where,
that a facrament is fo feuered from his ownc truth by the vnworthi-
ntflc of the recciuer , that there remaineth nothing but a vaine and
vnprofitable figure. But that thoumaiii hauenot afigne voide of
truth : but the thing with the figne , thou muft conceiue by faith the
word which is there enclofed. So howe much thou fhah by the fa-
craments profite in communicating of Chrift jfo much profite ftialc
thou take of them.
i6 If this be fomewhat darke bccaufe of the fliorteneflc , I will
fct it out in mo wordcs. I fay that Chrift is the matter, or (if thou
wilte)the fubftance of all facraments : forafmuch as in him they hauc
Lib.4. g[| tj^pjj. pcrfedne{re,and do promife nothing without him. So much
dift i'.* ^^^^ tolerable is the error of Peter Lombard , which doth exprefly
make them caufes of rightcoufnelfe and faluation , whereof they be
partes. Therefore bidding all caufes farewell which mans wit doth
faine to it felfe , we ought to ftay in this one caufe. Therefore howc
much we be by their miniftery holpcn to the nouri{hing,confirming,
and encreafing of tiie true knowledge of Chrift in vs, and to the pof-
feffing of him more fully,and to the enioying of his riche{rc,ro much
eftedualneffc they haue with vs. But that is done when we do with
true faiih receiue that which is there offered. Dothe wicked then
(wilt thou fay) bring to paflc by their vnthankfulneffe , that the or-
dinance of God be voide and turne to nothing ? I aunfwer that that
which I haue faid,is not fo to be taken,as though the force and truth
of the facrament did hang vppon the ftat« or will of him that rccei-
ueihit. For that which God hath ordeined remaineth fteedfaft and
k«;pcthftill his nature 1 howefoeuer men do vane. But lith it is one
thing to oflB:e,an other to receiue : nothing withftandeth but that
the fipne halowed by the word of God may be in deed e that which
it is called,and kepe Ins owne force : and yet that there come there-
Homcl. by no profit to an cucHdoer and wicked man. But Auguftine doth ^
'" " in fewewordeswellalfoilethisqueftion. If (faith he) thou receaueft 1
carnally , it cepffeth not to be fpirituall : but it is not to thee. But as 1
Auguftine hath in the afore faid places fhewcd that a facrament is
a thing nothing worth , if it be feuered from the truth thereof: fo in
d'doft ai^ other place he geueth warning that euenin the very conioining
Chrift. needeth a diftindion , leaft we fticke to much in the outward figne. i|
cap.^. As (faiih he) to followc the letter,and to take the fignes in ftcede of
the
To Saluation. Lib.4. 53P
the things, is a point of a fcruile wcakenefTe : fo to expounde the
ligncs vnprofirablyisapoint of euell wandring error. He namcth
two faultes which are here to be auoidcd:The one when we fo rake
the figncs as though they were gcuen in vainc , and when with aba-
cing or diminifliing their fecrcte fignifications by our cnuioufnefle,
we bring to pafTc that they bring vs no profitc at all. The other,
when in not raifingourraindes beyondcthc vifible fignc, we geuc
away to the facramcnt the praife of all thofc good things which arc
not geucn vs but of Chrift onely, and that by the Holy Ghoft,which
makcth vs partakers of Chrift himfelfe : and in deede by the helpe of
the outwardc fignes : which if they allure vs to Chrift , when they
be wrefted an other way , the whole profitc of them isvnworthily
ouerthrowcn.
17 Wherefore let this remainc certainc , that there is no other
office of the facraments than of the word of God: which is to offer
and fet forth Chrift vnto vs ,and in him the trcafurcsof heauenly
graceibut they auailc or profit nothing,but bcinge rccciued by faith:
cuen as wine j or oile , or any other li<^uor , though you poure it on
largely , yet it will runnabefidc & perifhjVnleffe the vcflcls mouth be
open to receiuc it , and the velTell though it be wctte rounde about
on the outfide, fliall neuerthclefle remaine emptie and voide within.
Befide this we muft beware,leaft thofe things which hauc bene writtc
by the olde writers fomewhat to glorioufly to amplifie the dignitie
of facramcnts.fhouldlcade vs away into an error nere to thisrnamely
that we (houlde thinke that there is fome fecrct power knit and fas-
tened to the facraments , that they may of themfeluesgeue vsths
graces of the Holy Ghoft ,like as wine is geucn in a cup: whereas
onely this office is appointed to them by God, to teftine and ftablifli
to vs the good will of God toward vs, and do profite no further vn-
lefl'e the Holy Ghoft ioin« himfelfe to them , which may open our
mindes and hartes, and make vs partakers of this tcftimonie,wiierin
alfo do clerely appcre diuers and feuerall graces of God. For the fa-
craments, as we haue aboae touched , are that thing to vs of Godj
which to men are melTangcrs of ioyfuU things,or eameftcs in ftabli-
{hing of bargaines : which do not of thcmfelues geuc any grace, but
do tell and (hcwc rs,and (as they be earneftes and tokens,)do ratifie
vnto vs thofc things that are gcuen vs by the libcralitic of God.Thc
Holy Ghoft (whom the facraments do not in comon without diffe-
rence bring to all men , bus whom the Lorde peculiarly geucth to
phcm that be his) is he that bringeth the graces of God with him,
which geucth to che facramcms place in vs ^ which maketh them to
Cap. 1 4. Of the outward meanes
bring fovth fruit. But although we do notdenic that Godhimfelfe
with the moil prefent power of his Spirit is prefent with his ownc
inftitution, leaft the miniftration which he hath ordeined of the fa-
craments fliould be fruitleffe & vaineryet we affirme that the inward
grace of the Spirit, as it is feuered from the outward minifteiic , fo
oui^ht to be feuerally weycdand confidercd. God therefore trucly
performeth in dcede whatlbeuci he promifeth andfigureth in fignes:
neither do the iignes wjnc their eftld, that the author of them may
be proiied true and faithfall. The queftion here is onely whether
God woirketh by his ownc and by inward power (as they call it) or
do refi^ne his office to out warde fignes. But we afiime , that what-
foeuer inlliumentshe vfcjhis oiiginall working is nothing hindered
thereby. When this is taught concernmo the facraments, both their
dignitieis honorably fct out, and their vfe is plainely fhewed, and
their profitablcnefle is abundantly reported , and the beftmeane in
all thcfe things is reteined, that neither any thing be geuen 10 them
which ought not, nor againe any thing be taken from them which is
not couenient to be taken from them. In the racane time that fained
deuife is tciktn away , whereby the caufe o^iuflificationand power
of the Holy Gholl is enclofcd in tlernents as in vefTels or waggons,
and that prmcipall force which hath bene omitted of other is ex-
piefly fet out.H- re alfo it is to be noted, that God inwardly worketh
that which the niinifler fi^ureth and tefliiiech by outward doing:lcaft
that bedrawentoamortail man, which God claimeth tohimfelfc
^'^ '' alone.The fame thing aJfo doth Augufhne wifely touch. Howe (faith
liam li hr)doth both Mofes fandifie , and God ? Not Moles for God : but
3. cap, Mofes with vifible facraments by his miniflerie, but God \yith inui-
*4« iible grace by his holy Spirit : where alfb is the whole fruit of vifible
facraments. For withoutthis fandification of inuifible eracc.what do
thofe vifible facraments profite?
18 The nameoffacramet,as we hauehetherto entreated of the
nature of it , doth generally conteine all the fignes that euerGod
gaae to men,to certitie and afTure them of the truth of his promifes.
Tnofc; he fometime willed to remaine in nqturall things , lometime
he df liuercd them in miracles. Of the firfl kinde thefe be examples.
Gen. 2. ai when he gaue to Adam and Hue, the tree of life for an earnefte of
17. and jmmortalitie, that they might afTure themfelues of it, fo long as they
^■J^ didcateof the frute thereof . And when he did fet the heauenly
I J. boaw for a monument to Noe and his pofleritie , that he would no
more from thenfe forth deflroy the earth with ouerflowing of water.
Thcfe Adam and Noc had for facraments. Not chat the tree did
geuc
To Saliiation. Lib.4, 540
gcuc them immortaJitic,which it could notgeuc to itfdfc : nor that
the Boawe ( which is but a ftrikiiig backc of a funbeame vpon the
cloudes againft it) was of force to hold in the waters : but bccaufc
they had a marke graucn in them by the word of God, that ihey
iliould be examples and feales of his teftaments. And the tree was a
tree bcforc,and the boawe a boawe. When they were written vppon
with the word of God , then a ncwe forme was pur into them , that
ihcy ihoulde begin to be that which they were not before. That no
man (hould thinkc thefc things fpoken without caufe , the boawe ic
felfc is at this day alfo a witnefle of that .coucnant,which God made
with Noe;which boawe fo oftc as we behoIde>wc readc this promifc
of God wrytten in it, that the earth fliallncuer be deftroyed with
ouerflowing of watcrs.Thcrforc if any fonde Philofopher,to fcornc
the (imphcitie of our faith , do affii me that fuch varietie of colours
doth naturally arife of refleded bcames and a cloude fet againft
themdet vs graunt it in decdc , but let vs laugh to fcornc his fenfleflc
follie, which doth not acknowledge God the Lorde and gouernor of
nature : which at his ovvnc will vfeth all the elements to the feruicc
of his owne glory.lf he had emprintcdruch tokens in the funnc, the
ftarres, the earth, ftones, and fuch like, they fhould all haue bene fa-
cramcntS to vs.Why are nor vncoined and coined lilucr both of one
value, (kh they are both one metjll ? cucn becaufe the one hath no-
thing but nature : when it is ftriken with a common maike,ic is made
inoney,and leceiueth a ncwe valuation. And fliall not God be able
to marke his creatures with his word , that they may be made fscra"
ments, which before were naked elemcis? Of the fecond kinde thefc
were examples , when he (hewed to Abraham a hght in a fmoking Gen.if,
ouen:when he watered the flecc with de we , the earth remaining *7-
dry : againe he watered the earih,the flcce being vntouched,to pro- ^
mife vidory to Gedcon: when he drcwe the (hadowc of tlic diall j^King.
ix.lines backeward,to promife fafety ioEzechias.Thefethings,when xo.5>.
they were done to relicue and ftabhflie the weakenefTe of their faith, ^^^' l^'
were then alfo facramcnts. 7*
19 But our prefente purpofe is , to difcourfe peculiarly of thofc
facramenis, which the Lorde willed to be ordinarie in his Church,
to nourifhe his worfliippcrs and fcruantes into one faith and the
confeflion of one faith. For (to vfe the wordcs of Auguftinc) men I-'br.^.
can be congeled together into no name of rehgion either true or ^^}l^
falfe , vnlefie they be boundc together with fome fellolhip of vifi- Manic.
ble fignes and facramentes. Sith therefore themoft good Father cap.n,
^orefawc this ncccditie, he did from the beginning ordeine cqrtainc
YYY luj
Cap.14. of the outwarde meancs
cKcrcifcs of godlineflc for his fcruantes , which after wardc Satan by
turning them to wicked and fuperfticious woifhippings , hath many
waves depraued and corrupted.Hereupon came thofe foletnnc pro- 1
fcflionsof cheGefftiles into their holy orders, and other baftarde
vfagcs : which aichough they were full of error and fupcrftition, ycc
they alio were therewith a profe that men could not in profeflion
of religion be without fuch outward lignes. But becaufe they neither |
were grounded vppon the word of God , nor were referred to that
trueth whereunto all lignes ought to be dircdcd,they are vnworthy
to be rehearfed where mention is made of the holy (igncs which
are orueincdof God and haue not fwafued from their fundation,
that is, that they fhould behelpesof true i^odlinefTe. They conlift
notof bare figncs, as were theboaweand the tree, but vpon Cere-
monies : or rather the (ignes that be here geuen are Ceremonies. But .
as it is aboue faid, that they be on the Lordes behalfc teflimonie i of
grace and faluation-.fo they be againe on our behalfemarkesof pro-
fedion , by which we openly fwcare to the name of God, for our
partes binding our faith vnto him. Therefore Chrifoftome in one
place fitly caHeththcm coiienantinfies whereby God bindcthhim-
felfe in league with vs,and we be bounde to purenefTe and hohnefTe
of life, becaufe here is made a mutuall forme of couenantingbc-
twcene God and vs. For as the Lordc therin promifeth that he will
canccll and blot out whatfocucr giltineff- a; d pcnaltie we haue ga- ^
thcred by offending , and doth reconcile vs to himfelfc in his onely I
begotten Sonne : fo we againe on our behalfcs do by this profeflion
binde our fclucs vnto him to the following of Godlinefl'e and inno-
cence : fo that a man may rightly Uy that fuch facramcnts arc Ccre-
monies,by which God will cxcrcife his people firft to the nourifhingj
ftirring vp^and ftrengthcning of Faith inwardly, then to the teftifying
of religion before men.
20 A nd euen thefe facramets alfo were diuerrc,aftcr the diuerfc ^
order of time,according to the diftribution whereby it plcafeth the
Lorde to ihewe himfelfe after this or thatmaner to men. For to
Abraham and his pofteritieCircumcifion wascommaundedrwhcrc-
unto aftervvai de puiifyings , and Sacrifices , and other Ceremonies
jcn.17 were added out of the lawe of Mofes. Thefe were the Sacraments
o. of the Icwes vntiU the comming of Chrift : at whichc comraing,
-euit. thofe bcin^c abrogate* two Sacramcnkcs were ordeined, which
and "^^^* '^^ Chriftian Church vfeth , Baptilme , and the Supper of the %
k^.itf. Lordc.I fpeakc of thofe that were ordeined for the vfc of the whole
Church. For as for the laying on of handcs^ whereby the miniAers
of
ToSaluauon, Lib.4, 541
of the Church are entred into their office , as 1 do not vnwiUingcly
fuSer it to be called a Sacrament/o I do not recken it among the or-
dinary Sacramentes. As for the reft which arc commonly called Sa-
cramentSjWhat they are to be accompted,we (hal fee byandby.How-
beit the old Sacraments alfo had refped to the fame markc, wherun-
to ours do tende,thac is>to dired and in a maner leade by the hande
to Chrift:or rather as images to reprcfent him, and (hew him foorth
to be knowcn . For whereas we haue already taught , that they are i.Cor.
ccrtaine feales wherewith the promifes of God are fealed;and where ao.
it IS mott certaine,tha: there was ncuer offered any promife of God
to me but in Chrift.that tliey may teach v$ of fome promife of God,
they muft nedcs ihewc Chnft. Whereunto pcrtaineth that heaucnly
patcrne of the tabernacle and of the worfliippinge in the law, which
was giucn to Mofes in the mount.Onc onely difference there is,thac
thofe did lliadow out Chnft being promiled,whe he was yet looked
for:thefe do teftific him already giuen and dchucred.
z 1 When thtlc things fhall all be particularly and cchc one fcuc-
rally declared , they ftialbe made much plainer. Circumcifion was to
the Icwes a figne, whereby they were put in minde,that whatfoeuer
commeth of rhefcedeofman^thatis to fay the whole nature of ma,
is corrupt,and hath ncede of proyninge.Moreouer it was a teaching, Q^n.*'
and token of remembrance , whereby they ftioulde conHrme them- 28.
fclues in the promife giuen to Abraham 5 conccininae that bkfffd
fcedein whom all the nations of the earth were to be blefled, from
Avhom they^hadde their owne bleflinge to be looked for , Now that
hcalthfull Cccdc (as we are taught of Paule) was Chnft,in whom a-
lone they hoped that they fhouide rccouer that which they had loft ^ ^
in Adam. Wherefore Circumcifion was to the the fame thing which Ro*n,,4
Paule faith that it was to Abraham , namely the feale of the rightc- u.
oufnes of Faith: that is to fay,the feale whereby they Ihould be more
certainely affured, that their Faith , wherewitij they looked for that
feedc, fhouide be accompted to them of God for righteoufneffe.Buc
wc {hall vppon a better occafion in an other place go through with
the comparifon of Circumcifion and Baptifmc. Baptifings and puri-
fyinges did fet before their eics their owne vncleannes,filthincs and „
pollution,wherwiih they were defiled in their owne n^turetbur they , ^ ^'^
promifcd an other waihingc,vvhcreby all their filthineffes flioulde be
wiped and waflied away. And this wafibinge was Chrift , with whofe , i u
blood we being waftied do bring his^leannes into the fight of God, 7I "/
that it may hide all our delilinges.Their Sacrifices did accufe them of R«uc.i
their owne wickedneire^nd thecewithall did (cach»that it was necei- $*
Cap.14. Or the outward meanes
dry that there (houldc be fome fatisfadion which fhouM be payd to
, 1 the iudgemct of God. That therfore there fhould be fome one chief
^ jc* 5, Bifhop , a mcdiatour betwenc God and men, which ftiouldc fatisfic
& jivi I God by ilicding of blood,and by ofFring of a Sacrifice which fhouldc
^^ *•* fuffice for the forgiuenes of finnes. This chicfe Prieft was Chnft:hc
'^^"^ 5- himfelfe fhed his ownc blood : he himfelfc was the Sacrifice : for he
oftred himfelfc obedient to his Father vnto death: by which obedi-
ence he tooke away the difobedience of man , which hadprouoked
the difpleafure of God.
21 As for our Sacramcntcs , they do fo much more clcarely prc-
fent Chrift vnto vSjas he was more neerely (hewed to men, fince he
hath bm truly deliuered of his Father fuch as he had bin promifcd.
ForBaptifme doth tcftific vnto vs that we are cleanfed and walhed,
the Supper of thankefgiuing tcftifieth that we be redeemed. In water,
is figured wa(hing;in blood.fatisfadion.Thefe two things are found
.Toh.5 in Chrift , which (as John faith) came in water and blood,that is to
fay that he might cicanfc and redeemc. Of which thing the Spirit of
God alio is a witneflfe. Yea there are three witneflTes in one. Water,
Blood,and Spirit.ln water and blood we hauc a teftimonie of clcan-
fing and redcemmge:but the Spiritc the principall witneflc bringeth
jh.ip. vnto vs aflured credit of fuch witneflingc.This hie myftery hath no-
♦• tably well bin (hewed vs in the crofTeofChrift.whcn water & blood
a^n ^°^^^ ^"' of his holy (ide:which fide for that caufe Auguftin right-
Q^ ' fiilly called the fountaine of our Sacramentes : of which yet we muft
cntreate fomewhat more at large . There is no dout bur that more
plentifull grace alfo of the Spirite doth here fliewe foorth it felfc if
you compare time with time. For that pertaincth to the glory of the
kingdom of Chrift,as we gather out of many places,bucfpecially out
of the 7. Chapter of John. In which fen(c we muft take that (ayingc
*olo. J, of Paule,that vnder the law were fhadowes,butin Chrift is the body.
7. Neither is it his meaning to (poyle of their effed the teftimonies of
grace , in which Gods wjll was in the olde time to proue himfelfe to
the Fathers a true fpcaker , euen as at this day he doth to vs in Bap-
tifme and in the holy Supper . But onely his purpofc was by way of
comparifonto magnifiethat which was giucn vs , leaft any (houlde
thinke it maruelous,that the Ceremonies of the law were abolKhed
by the comming of Chrift,
2^ But that fame fchoole do<fl:rine(as I may alfo briefly touch this
by the way ) is vttcriy to be hiBcd out , whereby there is noted fo
great a difference betwene the Sacraments of the olde and new law,
as chough thofe did nothingc but fhadow out the grace of God,and
thef«
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 542
tVicfc do prcfently giue it. For the Apoftle fpc.iketh no Icflc honora-
bly of chofe thaofthefc, when he tcachcch that the Fathers didcacc i.Coc
the lame fpirituallmeatc which we ea£c,and cxpoundcth that lame 10.3.
ixicate to he Chrift. Who dare make that an empty (ignc.which dc-
liucrcd to the Icwes a true communion of Chn(l?And the ^roundc
of the crxuk which the Apottle there iundcleth,doth plainly fight on
our fide.For,that no man trufting vpon a colde knovvicdtie of Chrift,
and cmpry title of Chnftianity,and outward tokens,lhould prcfumc
lodefpilechc iudgcmcntof God : helhewcth foorth examples of
Godsfeiierity to be feene in the Iewes:tha£ wc fiiouldc knowe that
the fame paines which they haue fuffrcd,hang ouer vs,it we foUowc
the fame faultes. Now that the companfon might be fir, it bchoued
that he ilioulde fhewc that there is no vnegallneffe betwene vs and
them m thofe good thmges whereof he did forbid vs to boali falfely.
Tncrcfore firfl he makethvs cgalj in the Sacramentes, andlea-
«eth to vs not fo much as any fmall pcecc of prcrogatiuc, that might
encourage vs to hope of efcapino;e vnpunifhed. Neitheir verely is it
lawfull to giue any more to our Baptifmc,than he in an other place Rora.4,
giueth to circumcilion, when he calletUit the fealc of the rightcouf- «»•
jieflfe of Faith. Whacfoeuer therefore is at this day gmenvsm our
Sacraments, the fame thing the Icwes in old time rccciucd in theirs,
that is to fay,Chrirt with his fpirituall richelTc . What power our Sa-
cramentes haue, the fame they alfo felt m theirs : that is to fiy , that
they were to them feales of Gods good will towarde them, intotiic
hope ofeternallfaluation. If they had binaptcxpolitors of the Hpi-
file to the Hebrues , they woulde not haue fo bin blinded. But when
they read there, thatfinnes were not cleanfed by t.-.e Ceremonies of *''^
, tlic law , yea that the olde fKadowcs had no auailing force to nghte-
cufnelfe; they negJcdinge the companfon which is ther« handcled,
while they tooke holde of this one thing, that the law of it felfc no-
thing profited thefolowers ofit^thoughtfimply that the figures were
v.oide of trueth.But the Apoftlcs meaning is to bring the ceremonial
law to nothmg,vntill it come to Chrift, vpon whom alone hangeth al
the effedualneflc of it.
24 Bur they will obied thofe thingcs which arc red in Paul con- !
cerning the circumcifion of the letter, that it is in no eftimation with
God,that It giueth nothing,that it is vaine.For fuch fayings fecmc to
prtffe it downe fane beaeth Baptifmc . Not fo . For the very fame
might rightfully hz fay d of Baprifme . Yea and alfo the fame is fayd,
firft of Paule himfelfe,wherc he ftiewcch that Godregardeth not the i.Cor.
jQutwaid wafliingc whereby WjC enter into profeftion of rcligion,vn- "o.j.
Cap.i4i- Of the outward mcanes
lefle the m'inde within be both deanfed and continue in clcanncflc
to the ende ; againc of Peter, when he teftificth that the trueth of
^^^ ^ Baptifme ftandeth not in the outward wa{hing,but in a good witnef-
t)laa. fingCjof confciencc. But he feemeth alfo in an other place vtterly to
;. defpife the circumcifion made with hand, when he compareth it with
^ the circumcifionofChrilt. 1 anfwcre that euen in this place nothing
is ;ibatcd of the dignitie of it . Patile there difputeth againft them,
which required it as neceflary when it was now abrogate. Thcrfore
he warncth the faithfull,thatleauing the olde {hadowes they fliould
ftande fa^ in the trueth. Thefc njaifters(fayth he)inftantly call vpon
you, that your bodies may be circumci(ed. But ye are fpiritually cir-
cumcifed accordmgto the foulc and body. Ye haue therefore the dc-
liucrance of the thinge in deede , which is much better than the (ha-
dowc. A man might take exception to the contrary and fay that the
figure is not therefore to be dcfpifed becaufe they hadde the thing
in deede : forafmuch as the putting of of the olde man of which he
there fpakcjwas alfo among the Fathers.co whom yet outwarde Cir-
cumcifionhaddc not bin fuperfluous.He preuenteth this obiedion,
whe he by & by addeth,that the Coloffians were buried with Chrift
by Baptjime . Whereby he fignifit th that at this day Baptifme is the
fame to Chrittians , which circumcifion was to the olde people : and
X therfore that circumcilion can not be enioined to Chriftians without
wrong done to Chrift.
2^ But that which foUowcth and which I euen nowe allcagcd , is
harder to affoyle , that all the lewifhe Ceremonies were (hadowes of
things to come,and that in Chrift is the body : but moft hard of all is
that which is entreated in many chapters of theEpiftlc to the He-*
brues,tliat the blood of beaftes, attained not to confcicnces:that the
law had a fhadow of good thinges to come,not an image of thinges:
that the folowers of it obtained no pcrfcdio of y Ceremonies of Mo-p
festand fuch other. I go backe to that which I haue already touched,
that Paule doth not therefore make the Ceremonies (hadowifh, be-
caufe they had no founde thing in them ; but becaufe the fufillinge of
them was after a cer|aine manner hanged in fufpenfe vntill the deli-
ueringe of Chrift . Againe I fay that this is to be vnderftanded not of
the effedualneffcbut rather of the maner of fignifying.For til Chrift
was manifcftly fhewed in the flcfh, all the fignes did fhadow him out
as abfent, howefoeucr he did inwardly vtter to the faithfull the prc-
fcncc of his power and of himfelfc . But this we ought chiefely to
marke , that in all thofe places Paule doth not fpeake fimply , but by
way of contention. Becaufe be ftriucd with the fajie Apoftles , which
wouU
To Saluation. Lib.4. 545
would hauc godlinelFe to confift in the Ceremonies oncly without
any rcfped of Chrift:to confute thcm,it fufficed oncly to cntreate,of
what value Ceremonies are by themfclues. This marke alfo the au-
thor of the Epiftlc to the Hcbrues followed.Lct vs therefore remem-
ber that here is difputed of Cercmonies,not as they be taken in their
owne and naturall fignification , but as they be wrefted to a falfe and
wrongfull expofitionrnot of the lawful! vfe of them, but of the abufe
of fuperftirion . What maruellis it therefore if Ceremonies beingc
feuered from Chrift,arc vnclothed of all force f For all lignes what-
foeuer they be,are brought to nought,whcn the thing fi-nificd is ta-
ken away. So when Chrift had to do with them which thought that
Manna was nothingc elfc but meate for the belly , he appheth his 'ohn«<
fpecche to their grofl'e opinion , and fay th that he miniftreth better .*^*
meate,which may fecde foules to hope of immortahiy. But if you re-
quire a plainer folution,the fumme of all tendeth to this:Firft,that ai
that furniture of Ceremonies,which was in the law of Mofes,i$ a va-
niflimge thingc and of no valucjvnleflc it be diredcd to Chrift. Sc-
condly,that they fo had rcfpcd to Chrift,that when he at length was
manifeftly fhewcd in the fle{he,they had their fuliilhnge.Fmally that
it bchoued that they (houlde be taken away by his comminge, euen
as aiTiadow vanilheth away in the cleare light of V funne.But becaufe
I do yet diflferrc loger difcourfe of that matter vnto that pbcc where
I haue purpofcd to compare Baptifme with circumcifion,thcrcforc I
do now more fparingiy touch it.
26 Perhaps alfo ihofe immeafurablc praifes of the SacrameHtcj,
which arc read in the oldc writers concerninge our figncs , deceiued
ihofe miferable Sophifters. As this of Auguftine. That the Sacramets In pr«
of the olde law did only promifc the Sauiour, but ours do giuc faiua- em c-
tion.When they marked not that thefc & fuch other formes of fpea- "^f^^p'
king were fpokcnrthey alfo publiihed their cxcefliuc doftnncSjbut in J^^^
a clcane contrary fcnfe from the wry tinge of the olde Fathers . For fuper
Auguftine meant no other thinge in that place, than as the fame numcr
Auguftine wryteth in an other place , That the Sacramentes of the "P- 5 J
law of Mofes did foretell of Chrift, but ours do tell of him prcCcnc. ^ * ^
AndagainftFauftus. Thatthofewercproraifesofthingcs tobcful-
filledjthefe were tokens of thinges fulfilled : as if he (houlde fay, that
thofe figured him whc he was looked for, but ours do as it were flievy
him prefent which hath bin already deliucrcd.Moreouer he fpeakcth
of the maner of fignifyinge,as alfo he fliewcth in an other place. The Li.i.c^
lawc(fayth he) and the Prophetcs had Sacramentes , forctellinge of licpeti
a thing to comc.buc the Sacramentes of our time do teftiHe that that <^^P'37
Cap.i 4. Of the oimvard mcancs
is already come, which thole did dcciarc to be toeomc.But what her
thought of the tbinge and cffe«fhiallnfirc , he expoundech in many
lomil pi-iCcs : as v* ncn he fayth, rhac the S^aMmcntes of the lew es were irt
ti loK, fii:nes,diiK:. re:but in the thing lignihcd,cgal with ourf-.-diuerfein vi-
>^. fibic rorme,but egalmfpintual power. Againe.Indiuerfehgnes is all
one Faith : i) in diuerfe ligncs, asindmcife vvordes.'becaufe wordes
change theu foundes by rimes ; and ti ucly wordes arc nothinse but
fignes . The Fathers did drinke the fame ipirituail drinke , for they
dron\cnot chc lamc bodily drinke. See ye therfore,Faith remaining
one J the (ignes vai led . To rhem the r ocke was Chrift : to vs that is
Chiift whicn IS fct vppon the aitar. And they dronke for a great Sa-
crameCjthe water flowing out of the rocke; what we dnnke, the fc<it!i-
fiiU knowe if thou confidcr the vifi jle roi me,they dronke an orher
thmguf an vndcrltadablc fienifacanon,they dronk the fame fpiritual
" P **• drinke. In an ottier place, in the myflcry the lame is tneir mcate and
Ah. 9. df'nke which is ours : but the fame in Cgniticaf lon^not in forme : be-
tnufau. caufc the kUc fame Chrift was figured co them m the rocke, & ihe-
ap^ij. H-edtovsinthefleih. Howebeit in this behaife alfowc graum that
there ii fome drfierencc . For both Sacramentes do teftine thit the
fatherJy good will of God and the graces of the holy Ghoft arc offe-
red vs in Cbriftrbut our Sacraments tcftity it more clearciy & bright-
ly.Inboth is a deliucrins ofChrifl:hut inthefe more plenteous and
fuller, namely as that difference of the olde and new Tcifament bca-
rcth,of which we haue entreated before. And this is it that the fame
iedcft. Auguftinemeant(whom we more oftc allege as the befl& faithfulltft
:^nft. wiraeffe of ;ii the otdc wTitcrs ) where he teach cth, that when Chnft
-*"• ^ was reaealed , Sacramentes were crdained both in number fewer, in
f *** fignificaaon hier,m force more excellent. Of this thine alfo it is ex-
pcdientV' the readers bricfely be warned,that whatfoeuertheSophi-
ftcrs haue trifimgly taught concerning y worke wrought, is not oncly
fa!ir, but difagrccth with the nature of the Sacramentes , which God
hath ordained , that the faithfull beinee voide and needv of all £:ood
thinees fhould bringe nothing thither but begger\*. Whereupon fo-
lo'A f th that in recduins thcmjthcfe men do nothinge whereby they
mny defcrue praife : or that in this doinge ( which in their rcipcdis
merely pai£ue)no worke can be afcnbed vnco them.
To Saltution, Ubj^ I44
Tbezv.Chapcct.
BAptifm«i*a%neoftheefjrin^^w|iaeiPirfiirf i-- '--•'ticj
. nto ch€ idomibip of ^ Chu \x boaee p^ , .-.nd
/v;r may be reckgncd iwmngc the cfail<ir*n o: vaviras
2:acn f$ or Go<i to diii okL^^which I bsac woohc to be com-
mon CO att cbe myftenes ) Er^ ch^irAcMyetiEMeapoarFjRh wrtfa
bwn, and to our confcffion before w rwc . Wenditfrieity'ieciaee
the manner of both piTpofga.Byifac Uiuguh Afcc tkr ■ rr
fagfa^iifaicfaatf»imAbehcwcrdly<iw»<»<t<£Tiwiid^
the Ix>rd fetcsfc out rrsa vs^iHCit (booUe be a eokoi jchI proofe^flf
our cieai^rige»3r((ocTprcfieflMriinadebcacr}ic»IikeiDai
fealr d cbaner, whereby he ctimntM ifc vbh» fs/luca0 oa
fo defaced, caacefled, an d blocxed oee , due dic^ 01017 oencr (
hii fighcjOocberehcadied^fiocbeiHipaied. For hewilieihv^aftclie^
that belcuejihcald be luyufciiiHiu focgiaenesoffiaaes. Thac6mc
they winch cboogfac that bapcifine laooffaiHgr dliebaram^ean^
token wiierbf we prote& our refegwo btf— t nicn,ji liwiliifc ^n beare
the conwiancc ofcfadr capwaine for awigkcofihcii ptofcflioa, wqf
noc that wfakh was tiK ctiicfe c&Hig m bopofiBcTkac 0 dho^inrwe
fhodJigcdBe«wgiirtw>pfBiiiric^faaEWMgfatiiaMcieltifefa^*^^
tired,thaI!>c&iK<i '^'
a !a this fenfe is tint to be milaflijgJe which Pariewncgth^ac- ^^
tfa^ Charch is &o&fic<i ofChnt^ her ^JMofir, aad ctranW wtch wa- T^
fhingeofwacerinthe wordof btc. Andtnaacxherplacc^dbc'jrcarc'nc.i.jL
faued acccrding 'o his mercy by the wafiHigaf regenerackx: as<i a€ ^'^<^§
the rcainnse of the holy Gho^ And thac which Peter wrxetfLjdac **•
bapofiiie iaaeth 75, ForPaiiieswiiivfasnoccofi§Biiie,diarottrwaH
(Hn^e and farfaafioo is pcrfedly MMdc by water , er^Mt wjwi cow-
ra* ->f r~ m IT Mfr th^ prtw^^r ti» rl^-afi^^P^^ iifi -i ^ a^ frnwr. Mjiilni
did Pezer meane cfae caa(e of fatwpoo , barooely ifte lminitLil|ii^L
and ccrtaynetie of facb gittes to be rcceiaed iachif Imi ■■mm
winch IS coidcadvenoaig^caiprcflcJin the wmhsdmrnSidma. For
Paiie knidcth cogabcr thewordeof life, and bflpafiae of water?
as if he had iaid^iHC by the Gofpell tfacaB&gcof waflang aad&i-
difyinge is brooj^ vs , tkc by b«pataie frdi tncfii^ tt fealcd. An4
Peter immcriiarfyadioyBcdi, thai tfaacUi|itifac gaocrhepotmige
away of the firhinefle ofihrirfhii^^agood "^"i^V^fr bc^xr GoA
which rs of Fayih.Yea bapofiae profin^^ vs noachcrcfeaf^i&baK
by the fpoiikkige of cijc biooJ of Cllzid : whidis %»edbyj
Cap.i 5. Of the outward mcancs
for the likcneflc of cleanfingc and wafhingc.Who therefore can fay
that we be clcanfed by this water,which certainly teftificth thac the
blood of Chrift is out true and only walhing? So that from no where
che can be fetched a furer reafon to cofute their bhndc errour which
refcrre all thinges to the power of the water,than from the fignifica-
tion of Baptifmc it felferwhich doth withdraw vs as well from that vi-
able elemcuc which is fct before our eies , as from all other mcanes,
that it may bindc our mindcs to Chrift alone.
5 Neither is it to be thought that Baptifme is applied only to the
time paft, that for new falhnges , into which we fall backe after Bap-
liln)e,we muft feeke new remedies of cleanfing in I wotc not what o-
thcr Sacramentcs , as though the force of Baptifme were worne out
of vfc.By this errour it came to pafle in old time,that fome would not
be Baptifed but in the vctcrmoft pertil of life, & at their hft gafpings,
that fo they might obtaine pardon of their whole life. Againft which
waywarde (iittle proujfion the old Biftiops fo oft inuey in their wry-
tinges . But thus we ought to thinke , that at what time focucr we be
B.iptifcdjwe are at once waflied ahd cleanfcd for all our life.Thcrforc
fo oft as we fall we muft go backe tathc remembrance of Baptifme,
& therwith we muft arme our minde , that it may be alway cercaine &
afiured of the forgiuencs of iinnes.For though when it is once mini-
fti ed, it Iccmeth to be paft, yet by later (innes it is not aboliftied. For
the cicanncs of Chrift is therein offred vs:thai alway flori{heth,is op-
prcflVd with no fpottcs,butoucrwhelmeth & wipeth away all pur fil-
thintlTe: yet ought we not to take thereof a liberty to finne in time to
come (as verily we be not hereby armed to fuch boldnes)but this do-
^rine is giucn only to them,which when they haue finned, do grone
wericd & opprcfted vnder their finneSjthat they may haue wherwitht
they may raife vp and comfort thsmfclues, leaft they ftiould fall into
Kom.}. <^o'^^"fio'^ an<i dcfperation. So Paul iaith,that Chrift was made to vs
35. a propitiator, vnto the forg^uenes of faults going before.VVhercin he
he dcnieth not that therein is obtained perpeta;ill & continuall for-
giuenes of finnes cuen vnto death: but he meancth that it was giue of
the FathcfjOnely to poorcfinners,which wounded with the fcaringc
iron of confcience,do figh to y Phifiiian.To thcfc the mercy of God
is offred. They which by efcaping of puniftimcnt do hunt for matter
& liberty to finnc,do nothinge but^rouoke to themfelucs the wrath
and judgement of God,
4 I know indede that it is commonly thought othcrwife, that by
the bcnefite of repentance and of the kcies we do after Baptifme ob-
Uinc forgiucnes, which at our firft regeneration is giucn vs by onely
Baptifme
To Saluarion, Lib.4. 545
Baptifmc.But they which dcuife this do crre herein that they do not
remember that the power of the kcics , whcrtof they fpeake , doth fo
hang vpon Baptirme that it ought in no wife to he feuercd. fhc (in-
ner rcceiucth forgiucncflc by the miniftery of cne Church , namely
not without the preachinge of the Gorpeli. But what maner of prea-
chinc; js that? That we be cicanfed fro finnes by the blood of Chrift.
But what (ignc andtcftimony is there ofthatwaihmg^bntBaptilme?
We fee therefore howe that abfolution is referred to Baptifuic. And
this erroui- hath bred vs the faincd Sacrament of per>ance ; of which
Ihaue touched fomewhat before, and the refidiie I will make an
cnde of in place fit for ir.But it is no marucl if mcn,which according
to the groIfenefTv of their witte were immeafurably faft tieil to out-
ward thmges , haac in tiiis behalfc alfo bewrayed that fault , that rot
contented wiih the pure inftitution of God , they did thruft m newe .
helpes faincd of themfclues. As though Baptifmt it feUc were not a
Sacramcntofrepentance.Butifrepentanccbecommendcd to vsfd^ •* *.
our whols life , the fofcc alfo of Baptifmcought to be extenckdTw UJfc.^i
the fame boundes. Wherefore it is alio no dout biK chat all the godly
thr6u2,hout al their hfc long,fo oft as they be vexed with knowledgf
in confcicncc of their owne finnes , dare callbacke themfclues to the
rczncrnbrance of Baptifmejthat thereby they may confirme thefeluci
in the affiance of that only and concmuallwalliing which we haucm : -
the blood of Chrili . • '
r5 It briageth alfo an other frute,becaufe it ihewcihvs our morti-
fication in Chrift, & new life in hira.For(ai the Apoftle faith) we ar« ^^^
Baptifed into his death, being buried together with him into death^
that we may walkc m newneffe of life. By which wot-des he doth not
enlyexhortevs tothcfoUowinge of him(as though he did fay jthat '
wcare by Baptifme put in mind,t!iat after a certaine example of the
death of Chrift, we (houlddie to our luftes:and after the example of
his refurrcftion,we{houldbc raifed vptorightcoufneflt)buthefct-
chcch the matter much deepcr:that is tofay,thatby Bapttfme Ci^rift
hath made vs partakers of his death , that we may be urrffed into it.
And as the graffe recciucth fubftancc and nourifhmcnt of rhe rootc
into wliich it is graft'ed:fo they that receiue Baptifme with fuch fsith
as they oughtjdo trucly fccle the effcduallnes of the death of Chrift
in the mortify ingc of their flefh: and therewithal] alfo they feelethc
cftcd of his refurredion in the quickenin!?e of the Spirit. Hereupon
be gathercth matter of- exhotjation.-that if we be Chriftians.wc ought
to be dead to linnc , and to line to righteoufncffe. This fclfc fame ar- ^ol» *.
gument he vfcth in an other plac&chac wc be circumcifed* and haiie ^*'
zzz
Cap.i 5. Of the outward meancs
^ put of the oUc man , fincethat wc be buried in Chrift by Baptilme.
^* ^' And in this fenfc,in the fame place which we haue before altcagcdj
he caJlcd it the wafhing of regeneration & of j enuinge. Therefore
firft free forgiucneffc of finncs & imputation of rightcoufnes is pro-*
mifcd V5,& then the grace of the holy Ghoft, which may reforme vf
into ncwncflc oflife.
6 Laft ofall our Faith recciuethalfo this profit of Baptifmc, that
it certainly tcftiticth vnto v$, that wc are not onely grafted into the
death and life of Chnft, but that wc are fo vnited to Chntt himfelfc
j^ljijf .; that wc arc partakers of all his good thinges. For therefore he hath
>j, ' * dedicated and hallowed Baptifme in his ownc body , that he might
haue it common with v$,a$ a moft ftrong bonde of the vniiy and fe-*
lowlTiippe which he vouchfaucd to enter into with vs : fo that Paule
Ci\t.x. proucththcfbyihatwc be the children of God, bccaufe wc haue put
17. or»0)riftin baptifmc. So wc fee that the fulHlhoge of baptifme :s in
A^ ^ Chrift , whom alfo for this reafon we call the proper obied of b^p-
i4r,Sft9 lifme. Therefore itis ro marucllif it be reported that the Apottlcs
^ baptifedinto his name, which yci wcrccommaunded to baptife in^
to the name of the Father alfo and of the holy Ghoft- For whatfoe-*
uer giftcs of God are fct foorth in baptifme , are founde in Chnft a*
lone. And yet it can not be , but that he which baptifcth into Chrift,
Mae 5?» do therewithal! call vppon the name of the Fathtr and of the holy
'^» Ghoft For wc are thcrfore clcanfed with his b]ood,becaufe the mer>
cifxiW Father according to his incoparablc kindnes,wiHingto rcceiue
vsinto fauour, hathfet him a mediator in the middcft, to procure to
vs fauour with him. But regeneratio wc fo only obtaine by his death
and rcfurrc<fbon, if being fanftificd by the Spiritc we be endued with
Matt J. ancwc and fpintuall nature. Wherefore both of our eleanfing & rc<*
f * generation : we obtaine & after a certaine maner diftindly percciue
i6^ '* the caufe in the Fathcr,thc martcr in ;he Sonne, and the eflfecft in the
Iahn.5. holy Ghoft. So lohnhiftbaptiGd/o afterward the Apoftlc5,withthe
> J«& 4- baptifme of repentance into the forgiuencffe of imnes : meaningc by
'• this word rcpcntance,fuch regenerationrand by forgiuencs of finncs,
walhing.
7 Wherby alfo it is made moft certaine,that the miniftcry of lohii
Aa. ^^^ altogether the fame which was afterward comitted to the Apo«<
>g. * files. For the diuers handes wherewith it is miniftred , make not the
baptifme diucr$:but the fame dodnne fhewcth it to be the fame Bap-
tifme.Iohn & the Apoftles agreed into one dodrinc : both baprifed
into repentance , both into the forgiueneflc of finnes , both into the
name of Chrift/rom whom wa« both repentance andforgiucnrflfc of
iinnes*
To Valuation. Lib.4. 54^
(inn«. John fofd t\\n he was the lambc of God , by whom the finnc* lohn. i.
of the world Ihould be taken away ; where he made him the SacnHcc ^^*
acceptabK to che Father, the propitiator of righteoufncflc-, the au-
thor of .aluation. What couWe the ApoUlcs adde to this conf (lion ?"
Whcr^or; let it trouble noman,thattheoldc writers labour to leucr
the one ho the otherjwhofe voice we ought not fo much to eftecrnc
thu It may fliike the certaincty of the Scripture. For who will rather
harl en to Chryfoftomc denying that forgiuencs of linnes was com- HomiL
prchcr.ded in the baptifme of Iohn,than tO Luke concrariwifc affir- in Matt,
niine;t cnat John preached the baotifme of repentiince into the for- •4«
gtutncs o^ linnc- ? Neiiheristhat Tuttelty of AuguRinc to berccei- Luc?^?
ued, th.it m rhe baptifme of lohn, linnes were forgiuen in hopejbut'g|^*^^^^.^ *
m the b^ptjfne of Chntt they are forgiuen in dcde.For whereas the cone. '
Euaiigvlirt plainely teltificih, that Lohn in his baptifme promifld the Donat.
forgiuencs otflnncs: whatnedcwc to abate this title of commend3-<^^P- **•
tion,v'hc no ncc'-fllcy compclleth vs vnto it? But if any man feke for "'" ^'
adilTercceour of the word of God, he ihali find none other but this, na.io.
that lohn baptifed into him that wastocome,thc Apoftles into him 4.
that had alrei^dy prefentcd himfclfc.
'8 As for this rhricn-ore abundant graces of the Spiritc were pou-*'
red out fincc the rclurrcdion of Ciiriit, it maketh nothing to ftablifh
admerfityof br.ptifmes. For the Baptilme Vvhich the Apcliies mi-
niitred while lit was yet conucrfant in earth* was c:)lled his.-yctithad
no larger plentifullntircof the Spiritc, than the bapnfmc of lohn/
Yea euen aftvr his afcenfion. he Spirite was not giuen to the Sama- o^k ^
ritins abouc the common mealurcofthe Faithfull before fheafcen; ,^ '^
fion , althout;h they were b.iptifed into the name of Iclub , till Peter
and lohn were fent vnto th;;m to lay ihcir handes vpon them. Thii<
onely thinge , as I thinkc , d<*ceiued the olde wryters,thjt they fayd
that the bapdfmeof lohn was but a preparation to ihe bapiif«T»eof
Chnfl , bccaufc they rcade, that they were hnptilcd againcof i'aulc,
which had once rccciued the baptifme of lohn. But howe muih thty
were herein decciued , ihall i^\Ct where he plamely declared m place
fit for it. What IS it therefore rhat lohn fayd,tii^t he bjpttfed indtde Matt. 5.
with water, but that Chrft iboL'ldc come which fhould bapcilc with u.
the holy GholJ, and with fyer r Thii may in fcwe wordes be afibyled.
For he meant not to put difference botwcne the one bapcifmeand
the other,but he coparcd his own perfon with the perfon of Chrift,
fayingc that himfelfc was a minsftcr of wa'cr, hut that Chnft was the
giucr of the holy Gholt , and ihouldc d clare this power by vifiblc
miracle the lame day that he ihouldc fende th - holy Ghoft , to the aA.z. :,
ZZZ ij
Gap.i 5. Of the outward meancs
are yet in the way , and let the beleuc thac they hauc much profited*
when they fcele that there is daily fomewhatminillied ofiheirluft,
t^ll they haue attained thither whither they irauajle , namely to the
lift death oftheir flefh,which fhalbe ended m y dying of chi$ mortal
life. In the meane time let them notceffe both to ftrme yaUaniIy,and
to encourage them to go forward,3nd to ftirre them vp to full vido*
rie. For this alfo ought more to whet on their endeuoui s, that they
fee that .after that they haue iongc trauailed, they h^ue ytt no fmall
b'jfiiuirc remaminge. This we ought ro holde;y/e arc baptifcd mto
tlic mortifyinge gf our fleth,which is begon by bsptifm^ in vs,which
wc daily folow : but it Hulbe made perfcd when we ihall remoue out
of this hfc to the Lord.
iz Here we fay no other thing, thnn the Apoftlc Paulc in the fc-
u?nih Chapter to the Romaines mod clearely fvitceh out. For after
that he had difputed of free righteoufneSjbecaufe fome wicked men
did thcreof^:^achcr,that we might hue after our ov/ne luftjbecaufe wc
fhouldc not be acceptable to God by the deferuingcs of workesrhe
addethjthat ail they that are clothed with the righteoufncs of Chnft,
are therewith regenerate in Spirire, and that of this regeneration
we haue an earneft in baptifme . Hereupon he exhorteth the faith-
full, that they fuffcr not finne to haue dominion in their members.
Now becaufe he knewc that there is alway fome wcakcncffe in the
faithfull : that they fhouldc not therefore be difcouraged, he adioy-
neth a comfort , that they are not vnder the lawc. Becaufe againe it
might fcemCjthat Chriftians might growe infolcnt, becaufe they arc
not vnder the yoke of the law, he entreateth what maner of abroga-
ting that is,and therwithall what is the vfe of the law:which queftion
he had now the fecond time differredcThe fumme is,that we be de-
huercd from the rigour of thelawc,that we fluoulde cleauc to Chrift:
but th.^t the office of the law is,that we being conuinced of our per-
u':r'cneffe,{houlde confefle our ownc weakenelTe and mifery. Now
fotafmuch as that peruerfenes of nature dotji notfo eafily appeate
inaprophancman, which followeth his owneluftes without feare
of Godrhe fcttcth an example in a man regenerate, namely in him-
felfe. He faith therefore that he hath a cpntinuall wraftling with the
rrmnantes ofhis fteHie^and that he is holden bpunde with mifcrable-
bondage,that he can not confecrate himfelfe wholly to the obediecc
of rhe law orG;).i.T!->crefore he is copelled withgroningto crie put;
Vnhappic ami. Wholhalldcluermc out of this body fubicdto
death? If the children of God be holden captiue in prilon fo long as
ihey liue,thcy muJJ nedes be much carefully gricucd with ihinkingc
vpoa
To Saluation. Lib4. 548
^pon their ownc penll,vnlcHc this fcarc be met withall. ThcrcfoiC
he adioyncth to this vfc a comfort.that there is no more damnation
to them that arc m Chnft lefu. Where he teacheth,that they whom Rom.i,
tlie Lord hath once recciucd into fauour,engraftcd mto the commu •
nion of his Chnli , hath by baptifme admitted mto the felowHiip of
his Church,while iliey continue in the faith of Chrift,although they
he befisgcd of finne, yea & cary linne about within them, yet arc ac-
quitcd fiom giiiincs & condemnation.If this be the fimple Sc natural
cxpolition of Paul, there is no caufe why we Hiouid feeme to tcachc
any new vnwonted thing.
1^ But bapnfmefofeiueth our confelTion before men. For it ij a
fnarke , whereby we openly profeflc that we woulde be accomptcd
amonge the people of God:vvhercby we tdtiHc that we agree with
all Chriftians into the worfhipping of one God & mto one religions
linaliy wherby we openly affirme our faithahat not only our heartcs
fhoulde breath out the praife of God , but alfo our tongue , and ail
the members of our body fhoulde founde it out with fuch vtterancei
as they be able. For ro,as we ought, all our thinges are employed lo
theferuice of the glory ofGod,whercofnothing ought to bevoyd,
and other may by our example be (lirrt-d vp to the fame endeuoiirs.
Hereunto Paul had refpcd,when he asked the Corimhian$,whethcr i.Cor.r
they had not bin baptifcd inio the name of Chrift : meaning verily, «,
that euen in this that they were baptifcd into his name,thcy auowed
themfelues vnto him,fwore to his name, & boundc their faith to him
before men, that they couldc no more confcffc any other, but Chriil
alone, vnles they would forfake the confcnlon which they had made
inbaptifme
14 Now Hth it is declared what our Lord had regard vnto in the
inftitution of baptifme:it is plaine to iudgc what is the way for vs to
vfcandrecciueit. Forfo farrcasitis giucntotherai(in^e, uouri-
filing and confirming ofourfaith,tt is to be taken as ftom tiic hande
of the author himfelfe : we ought fo holde itcertainc and fully pei:*
fuaded , that it is he which fpeaketh to vs by the figne , that it is he
which clenfcth vs,wafhcih v$,& puttcth away the remebrance of our
(innes,that it is he which makcth vs partakers of his dcath,which ta-
kcth away from Satan his kingdomc,which feblcth the forces of our
luft.yea which groweth into one with v$,:hat being clothed with him
we may be reckened the children of God:that thcfc things, I fay, he
doth inwp.rdly fo truely & certainly piirforme co our foule,as we cer-
tainly fee our body outwardly to be wr>flied,d!pped,and clothed. For
this either rcIauoi}*or l)mihtu4c, i$ the moft furcrulc of Sacramcncs;
ZZZ tiij
Cap.i5. Of the outwardmcaiics
thac in bodily thlnges wc ihould bcholde rpiritualithinge»,a$ if they
were pi eiently fee before our eies , forafmuch as it hath pleafed the
,t.;.;r Lorde to reprcfent them by fuch tigures: not for that fuch graces arc
bounde and enclofed in the Sacrament , that they (hould be giuen vs
by rhe force thereof: but only bccaufc the Loide doth by this token
teftifie his wdl vnto vs , that is , that he will giue vs all thefc thingcs,
Nejcherdoth he onely feedeour eyes with a naked fight, buthe^
Bringeth vs to the thing prefent , and together fullfillcth that which
itfiguicth.
1 5 Hereof let Cornelius the capitainc be an example, which was
Aft. 10. baptifcd, liauingc before rcceiucd forguiendleof finnes and vifiblc
'^^- graces ot the holy Ghoft:fcekinCT not by bapiifme a larger forgiucnes
but a more ccrtaine excrcihng of Faith,yea an encrcafe of confidence
by a pledge. Paraduenture Tome man will obicd: why therefore did
Ananias fay to Paulc, that he flioulde wafhe away his finnes by bap-
ci(me,if finnes be not waflud away by the power of baptifme itfclfe?
I aunfwerc : Wc are fayd to rcceiue, to obtainc, to get that which fo
ferre as concerncth the feeling of our faith, is giuen YS of the Lorde,
whether he do then firft teitifie it , or beinge teftified doth more and
ccrtainclier confimie it . This therefore onely was the meaninge of
Ananias ; that thou mayeft be nffurcd, Paule,that thy finnes arc for-
giuen thee , be baptifed. For the Lorde doth in baptifine promifis
forgiuencfle o( finnes : receiue this , and be out of care. Howebeit I
meane not to dmiimlhe the force of baptilme , but that the tbinge
and the ttueth is prefent with the fignc , fo farrc as God worketh by
outwarde mcancs. But of this Sacrament , as of all other , we obtainc
nothmgc but (o much as we rcceiue by Faith . If we want faVth , it
(halbefor a wittiefTe of our vnthankefullnes , wherby we may be de-
clared gilty before God , bccaufc we haue not beleued the promife
there giuen. But fo farre as it is a figne of our confeilion, v/e ought
by it to tcftifie that our affiance is in the mercic of God , and our
cleannclTc is m the forgiuehefle of finnes , which is POtccn vs by le-
fus Chrirt : and that by it we enter into the Church of Chrift , tha«
we may with one confent of Faith and charitie hue of one mindc
with all the faithfuil , This laft point didde Paulemeane , when he
faveth that we arc all baptifed m one Spirite , that vvc may be one
body. : '
i6 Nowcif this be true which wedcternrrine,that a Sacramenris
not to be vveyed accordmge to his hnndeof whomitisminiftred,b«0
as of the very hande of God,frorn vviio:rt without dout it proceeded;
hereupon wt -may gather, that noihuigc » addcdio it nor ukcniiroin
To Saluation. Lib.4. 54^
ifby^rfie worchincflc of him by whocshande ins dcliucrcd. And
tfu«n as among mtn,if a letter be fent,to that the hand and the fcalc
bc-wcU knowcn,it maketh no matter who or what mancrof man be
the carrier ; fo it ought to fufficc to acknowe the hande and fealc o£
our Lordc in hjs Sacrameis, by what carrier {bcucr they be brought.
Hereby the error of the Donatiftcs is very well confuted > which
mcafurcdthc force and valueof the Sacrament by the worihincfle
of thcminifter. Such at this day arc our Catabapnites, which deny
that we be rightly baptifcdjbccaule we were baptifed by wicked men
and idolatrcrs in the popifh kingdome : therefore they furioufly call
vpon vs to be baptifed again. Againft whoes follies wc fhalbc armed
with a rcafon Itrong enough, if wc thinke that we were profefTed by
b^pcjfmc not into the name of any man , but into the name of the
Father, the Sonne, and the Holy Ghoft , and that therefore it is not Mat. t9
thcbaptifmcofmanjbut of God,of whomfoeuer it be miniftred. ly-
Aldiough they were neucr fo much ignorant or defpifers of God
and all godhnclTc, which baptifed vs : yet they did not baptife vs into
the feliowlhippe of their owne ignorance orfacrilcgc i but into the
faith of lefus Chriltbecaufe they called not vpon their owne name,
but the name of God, nor baptifed vs into any other name. Nowc if
it were the baptifmc of God , it ha:h verily cnclofed in it a promifc
of the forgeucnelfc: of finncs , the mortifying of the flclh, the fpiri-
tuall quickning, and the partaking of Chrift. So it nothing hindered
thelewes, tohaucbcne ciicumcifcd ofvncleane pricib and apo-
ftataes : neither was the figne therefore voide , that in needed to be
done of newe : but it was iufhcient to rcturne to the naturail bcgin-
niag. Where they obicft that baptifmc ought to be celebrate in the
alfemblie of the godly, that prouethnot,that that which is faultic in
partei Ihould deftroy the whole force thereof. For whcnwe teachc
what ought to be done that baptifmc may be pure , and voide of all
defiling , wc do not aboliihe the ordinance of God , although ido-
latrcrs corrupt ic.For when in oldc time Circumcifion was corrupted
with many fuperftitions , yet it ceafled not to be taken for a lignc of
grace : neither did lolias and Ezechias , when they gathered out of
all Kraeil them that had dcpoited from God , call them to a fcconde
Circumcifion.
17 Now where as they afkc vs , what faith of ours hath yet'fbl-
lowcd bptifmc m certaine ycares paft,that they might thereby proue
that the baptifmc is voide, which is not fandificd vnto vs,but by the
word of promifc rcceiued by faith : to this queftion wc aunfwer,thac
we in decdc being bhndc & vnbdeuingtdid ^i a long time not holde
Cap.i 5. Of the outwardc mcancs
fafty promifc giue vs in baptifmc:yetthc piomifc it icifcyior as much
as It was of Godjcontinucd alway ftayccl,ftcclfaft,and truc.Althougb
all mcnnc be iters anii fai thbreakers,yct God ccfTcth not to be true:
Rom.}, although all mennc be Ioft,yct Chrift rcmaineth faluation. Wc con-
J* fcflc therefore that baptifmc/or tliat time profited vs nothing at all:
forafmuch as in it the promife ofTcrcd vS) without which baptifmc li
nothing , lay nothing regarded. Nowe fith by the grace of God, wc
haue begonne to waxe wifer , we accufe our owne blindnelfe and
hardncflc of hart , which haue fo long bene vnthankefuil to his fo
great goodncffc. But we belcue that the promife it fcife is not va-
niOiedaway.but rather thus we cofider, God by baptifme promifcth
the forgeuenefTc of finncs , and fith he hath promifed it, will vndou-
tedly performe it to all that beleue it. That promife was ofFred vs in
baptifme : by faith therefore let vs embrace it. It hath in dcede long
bene buried from vs bccaufe of infidelitie : nowe therefore let vs rc-
ceiueit by faith.Whcrforc where the Lord callcih the icwilh people
to repentance , he geueth themnocommaundementofa feconde
Circumcilion, which being (as we haue faid) circumcifed with a wic-
ked andvngodly handc,liuedacertaine time entangled with the
fame wickcdneifc. But he earncftly callcih vppon the onely turning
of ihe hart.Fkcaufe, howe foeuer the couenat was broken of them,
yet the (igne of the couenant , by the ordinance of the Lorde ,re»
mained alway ftcdfaft and inuioIablc.Therefore with the onely con-
dition of repentance they were rcftored into the couenant which
the Lorde had ones made with them in Circumcifion: which yet
being receiued by thehandeof aic3gacijreikerprieft,fomuchas
in them lay, they had defiled agai0c,andthccfcd whereof they
had quenched.
1 8 But they thinke that they (hake a fiery dartc at vs, when thev
AO.!^. allege that Paule rebaptifed them which were ones baptised witn
S* the baptifme of Iohn.For if by our owne confe{Iion,the baptifme of
lohn was altogether the fame that ourcs is nowe : euen as they ha-
wing bene before peruerfely intruded , when they were taught the
true faith, they were againe baptifedinto it : fo that baptifme, which
was without true Do(5b:iQe, is to be taken for nothing, and we ought
to be newely baptifed againe into the true religion , wherewith wc
are nowe firft inftrufted. Some thinke , that there was fome wrongs
fully affedioned manhe to lohn , which haddc entred them with
their firft baptifme rather to a vaine fuperflition.Of which thint; they
feeme to gather a coniedurc hercupon,becaufc they cSfefTed them*
felues to be vccerly ignorant of (he Holy Ohoibwhcr^at |phn verily
To Saluation. Lib4. 550
would ncuer hauc fcntc away from himfclfe fcholari fo vntaugbc
Bui neither is it likely th:^t the Icwes, although they had wor bene
baptifcd at all , were dclhtute of all knowledge of the Holy Ghoft,
which is famoufly fpokcn of by fo m^ny tcttimonies of the Ici ipturc.
Where as therefore they aunfwere that they knowe not whether
there be a Holy Ghoft , it is to be vnderftanded as if they had faid
that they haue nocyet heard, whether the graces of the Spirit, of
which Paule af ked them, were gcucn to the Difciples of Chiift. But
I gi aunt that that was the true baptifmc of lohn, and all one and the
feltc fame with the baptifmc of Chrift: but I deny that they were
bapnfed againe.VVhac then mcane thefe wordes,they were bapttfed
in the name of lefus? Some do expound ir,thai they were butinftru*
ftcd of Paule with true Do^rine. But I haddc rather vrndcrftandc it
more limply jto be the haptiUne of the Holy Ghoft, that is to fay,that
the vifible graces of the Spirit were geuen them by the laying on of
handes: which to be exprefled by the nameot baptifme, isnonewe
thing. As on the day of Petccofte it is fajd,that the Apofties rcmcm- Ad.i.f
bred the wordes of the Lorde , concerning the baptilme of ficrand
of the Spirit. And Peter faith that the fame cametohisicmcbrance,
when he lawe thofe graces poured out vpon Cornehus.and his Aft.ii.
houfeholde and kinred. Neither is that contrarie which is after ad-«^.
ioinedjWhen he had layd his hands on them, the Holy Ghoft came
downc vpon them. For Luke doth not tell of two diuerfe thmgstbuc
fcllowetb the maner of telling commonly vfed among the Hcbrues,
which do fiift propounde the (umme of the matter,and then do fet it
out more at large. Which euery man may perceiue by the very fra-
ming to?,ethcr of rhe wordes. Forhe faith. When they had heard
ihefe thmsjSjthcy were baptifed in the name of lefus. And when Paul
had layed his handes vpon chem,thc Holy Ghoft came downe vpon
them. In this latter fentence is defcribed , what maner of baptifmc
l^at was. If Ignorance do (o corrupt a former Baptifmc , that it muft
be amended with a feconde baptifmcuhe Apoftles Ihould haue bene
reb^ptifed firft of all,which in whole three yeres after their baptifme,
had (caf^cely taftcd any (hiaJl parcell of purer doArinc. Andnowe
among vs whatriuer^ might iuffice ro renewe fo many waftiings ,as
there be ignorances by the mercy of the Lordc daily amended in vs?
ip The forcc,dignitic,profit,and ende of the mifteriejf I be not
decciucd, ought by this time to be plaine enough. Somuchascon-
ccrneth the ourwarde figne, I would to God the naturall inftitunoa
of Chrift had preuailed fo much as was mete,to reftrainc the bolde-
nclTc ofmexvFor^as thoi^gb it were a contemptible thing to be
Cap,i5« Of the outwarde mcancs
baptifed with water according to the precept of Chrift , there \s in-
uenrcd bleiling , or rather enchaunting , to defile the true hallowing
of the water. Afterwardc was added a taper with chrefmc : but the
blowing feemed to ope the gate to baptifme. But althqugh 1 am not
ignorant , howe auncient is the beginning of this added packeryct ic
is lawful! both for me and all the godly to refufc whatfoeuer things
men haue prefumed to addc to the ordinance of Chrift.Wbcn Satan
fawe that by the foolifh hght credit of the world at the very begin-
nings of the Gofpel his deceitcs were eafily recciued,he brake foorth
into grolVer mockeries. Hereupon fpittlejand like trifles, were openly
brought in with vnbridlcd libertic to the reprochc of baptifme. By
which cxpericces let vs learnc that nothing is cither holier,or better,
or fafcr,than to be cocent with the authoritie of Chrift alone.Howc
much better therefore was it,leauing ftagelike pompes,which dafell
the eyes of the fimple, and dull their mindes , fo oft as any was to be
bapnfedjthat he (liould be pi efcnted to the aflembhe of the faithfull,'
and be oflred to God,the whole Church loking on as a witneffciand
praying ouer him ; that the confefllon of faith Hiould be rehearfed,
wherewith he that is to be catechifed fhould be inftiuded : that the
promifes fhould be declared which are conteined in baptifme : that
the inftruded lliould be baptifed in the name of the Father, and the
Sonne , and the Holy Ghoft : at length thac he be fente away with
prayers and thankefgeuing . So is nothing omitted that might make
to the matter , and that the onely Ceremonie which proceded from
God the author thereof, fhould moft clercly fhine, being not ouer-
whelmed with any forein filthinelTe.But whether he be wholy dipped
which is baptifed, and thatthrifc or once, or whether he be but
iprinklcd with water onely poured vpon him, icmaketh very little
matter : but that ought to be at libertie to Churches according to
the diucrfitie of contrces.Howbeit the very word of baptizing figni-
£eth to dippe, and it is certaine that the mancr of dipping was vfed
of the olde Church.
20 This alfo perteinech to the purpofe,to knowc that it is done
amiflTe if priuatc men take vpon themfelucs the adminiftration of
baptifme.For as well the diflribution of this as of the Supper is a part
of the ecclefiafticall minifterie.For Chrifl did not comaunde women,-
nor yet euery fort of men, y they fhould baptize : but whom he had
ordeined his Apoftles, to them he gaue this commaundcment. And
when he commaunded his difciples to do that in the miniftratioa
of the Supper which they had fene him do, when he executed the.
e^e of a right diilributer : he would without dout, that chey ihoul4
thcrcift
To Saluation. Lib.4, 551
therein followc his example. As for this that in many ages paft , yea
and jn a maner at the very beginning ofthc Church,ic hath bene re-
cciucdin vie , that lay men might baptife in pcnll of death, if the
miniftcr were not prcfent in limej fe not with howc ftrong a rcaibn
it may be defendcd.The very olde Fathers themfducs.which cither
hclde or fuf&cd this mancr , were not furc whether it were well
done.For Auguftine fecmeth to haue this dout , when he faith : Al- Libr*»
though a lay man compelled by ncccllitic do geue baptifmc , I can ^<^.'J"*-
not tell whether a man may godlily fay that it ought to be iterate. ^^J^'
For if It be done when no ncceflinc compelleth, it is the vfurping of cap. ii,
nn other mans office : but if ncceflme enforccth , it is either none or Cap.c.
a veniall finne. Moroeuer of women it was decreed without any ex-
ception in the Councell at Carthage , that they fliould not prefumc
to baptife at all. But there is danger , leaft if he which is (ickc fhould
die without baptifmc,hc Ihould be dcpriued of the grace of regene-
ration. Not fo. God pronounccth that he adopteth our infantes to 4
be his owncjbcforc they be borne,whcn he promifcth that he will be
a God to vs and to our fecdc after vs. In this word is conteined their
faluation. Neither (hall any man dare to be (b rcprochefuU againft
God , to deny that his promife is of it fclfc fufficient to worke the
effed tbereof.Howe much harme that dodrine being euiU expoun*
ded,that baptifme is of neccffitie to raluation,hath brought in, fcwc
do markc:and therefore they take leflc hecde to them(elfe.For where
this opinion is growen in force , that all arc loft to whom it hath not
happened to be waflied with water, our ftate is worfe than the ftate
of the oldc people , as though the grace of God were nowe more
narrowly ftieigthened than it was vnder the lawe. For Chnft fhalbc
thought to be come , not to fulfill the promifes , but to abojilh them:
forafmuch as the promife which then was of it felte efledual enough
to geue health before the eighth day , nowe fhould not be of force
without hclpe of the fignc.
u But howe the cuftome was before that Auguftine was borne,
firft is gathered of Tertullian, that it is not permitted to a woman to
fpeakc in the Church, nor to teach, nor to baptife, nor to offer, that
ihe flioulde not claimc to her felfe the cjfecution of any mans oflice,
much Icfle of the Priefts.Of the fame thing Epiphanius is a fubftan-
tiall witncfTc, where he reprocheth Marcion, that he gauc women li- Libr<
bertie to baptife. Neither ami ignorant of their annfwere which ^"""*
thinke othcrwife, that is, that common rfe much difFereth from cx-
iraordinarie remedie,whca extreme neceffitie enforceth : but when
he pronouncing that it is a mockerie to geue wome liberty to bapcife.
Cap.i 5. Of the outwardc mcancs
exccpteth nothing, itfufficiently appcareth th-c he codemneth ihh
corrupcion,fo that it is by no color cxcufable. Alfo in the third bokf ^
where teaching that it was not permitted cuentociie hojy mother
of Chnft,he addcth no rcftramtc.
bro.4. 12. The i xample of Scphora is vnfeafonably alicgcd-For whcras
>$• the Angellof God was appcafsd, after that flbecsking a ftone,tJr-.
cumcifecl her fonnc, thereupon it is -.vrongfully E^athered that her
doing was nilowed of God. Othcrwiie it ought to be faid, that the
wormipping whuh the nations that were bioujjht out of Aflyria
raifedvp,pleafi.dGod. But by other ftrone reafons it isproucdvthat
that which a foohfh woman did, is wrongfully drawen to an t xaniplc
of imitation. 1 f I (hould fay that it was a certaine lingular cafe,wbich
ought not to be m.->de r.n example, and tpecuUy thatfichir is no
where red that in oldc time there was gcucn to the Pricfts a fpeciall
comaundcmcncto circumcifc.theocder ofCircumcifion & bapnfme
ifar»S. is vnhke:this (hould be ftrong enough to confute them. For th«
9. wordes of Chrift are plamc: Go ye, teachc all nations, and baptife,
Wiicn he ordejnedthc lelfe fame men publifhersof the Goipel,5c
^eb.5. mmifters of bapnfmer & none (as the Apoftle witncflfeth) doth take
y honor vpon himfelfe in the Church , but he that is called as Aaron:
lom.14 wholbuer without lawfull calling bnptifeth,he rullieth into an other
^^* mans office.Euen in the fmallcft things,as in meate & drmke,vvhat-k
focuer we enterpnle wiih a doutefull cofcence , Paule openly crieth
out to be finne. Therefore in womens baptihng is much more gre-
uoufiy (inne,where it is euident that they breake the rule appointeii
by Chrift rforafmuch 3$ we knowc that it is vnlawfull to pluckein
fonder thofe things that God conioineth. But all thislfalT^ ouer.
Onirly I would hauc the redcrs to note,that Sephoraes purpofe jvas
nothing lefl'e, than to do any fei uicc to God. Seing her fonne to be
in danger,l]ie grudged, and murmured, and not without ftomaching
threwe the forcfkinne vppon the groundc, lhi:fo taunted her huf-
bande, that ihe was alfo angrie with God. Finally it is pJaine that all
this came of a funoufneirc of mindc, becaufe ihe murmured againft
God and her huf bade,for that the was compelled to fhed rhe blood
of her fonne. Moreouerif ftic had in all other things behaued her
felfcweilj yet herein is an vnexcufable rafhe prerumptionthat{he
circumcifed her fonne,her huf bande bcmg prerente,not any priuate
inanne,but Moles the principall Prophete of God,chan whom there
ncucr rofe any greater in Tfraell : which was no more lawfull for her
to do , than at this day it is for women in the fight of the bilhoppc.
But this concroucifie (hall by and by be eafily taken away by this
To Saluation, Lib.4. 55a
principle, that infantes arc not debarred from the kingdome of
heaucniwhom it happenech to dcparte out of this prcfcnt life before
that ic be graunted them to be dipped in water . But it is aireadjf
proued , that no fmall vrrong is done to the couenanc of God , if we
do not reft in ic,is though it were weake of it felfe: whereas the vffcSk
thereof hangeth neither vpon baptifme , nor vpon any additions.
There is afterward added to it a Sacrament hkc a fealc , not thatic
bringeth effcdualnciTc to the promife of God as to a thmg weake of
k feife , but oncly confirmeth it to. vs. Whereupon followeth , that
the children of the faiihfuil are not therefore bapnfed , that they,
may then hi ft be made the children of God, which before were
ftraun^crs from the Church , but rather that they be therfore recci-
ucd by a folemne iigneinto the Church, becaufc by the benefitcof
tiiepioraifc they did already belong to the body of Chrift. There-
fore if m omitting the figne there be neither flouthfulne(re,nor coa^
rempcc, nor negligence , we arc free from all danger. Ic is therefore
much more holy , to geue this rcuerencc to the ordinance of Gad,
that we leke Sacraments from no where els , than where the Lordc
h uh leftc them. When we may not haue them of the Church ,thc
grace of God is not fo bounde to them , but chat we may obccioe
thera by faith out of the word of the Lordc.
The xvj. Chapter^
That the 'iaftijhte ef infantes doth vtry well agree with the tnjiitMtitn
tf Chrtft and the nature ef the figne,
Vt forafmuch as in this age , certaine phrentikc Spirits hauc
raifed vp ibre troubles in the Church for the Baptifme of in-
fantes , and do not yet cefTe to turmoile : I can not chofc but
I muft toinc here an addition to reftrain their funoufnefTe. If
paraduenture it (hall feemc to fome man to be very much tolong.lct
him (I befcch him)wcy with himfclf,y wc ought fo much to efteemc
the purencfle of do<Srinc in a moft great matter , together with the
peace of the Church.thai nothing ought to be lothefomly receiuedL
which may auailc to procure them both.Bcfide y,l fo ftudy to frame
this difcourfe, that ic (hall be of no fmall importance to the clerer
declaration of thcmiftcry of baptifme.They aflaile the baptifme of
infantes with an argumet in decde fauourable in (hewc,faying that ic
is grounded vpon no inftitution of Chrift , but that ic was brought ia
oncly by the boldneflc of men, and peruerfe curioufnefTc , and then
afccrwacd with fondc cafkieife rafhly receiucd io vfcFor a faciameu
-Cap.K^. . Of the outivardemeanes
vnleife it reft vpon a ccrtaine fundation of the word of .GodJiangetli
but by a thrcd. But what ifjwhcn the matter is wcl confideredjit lliall
appcare that the Lordes holy oi dinace is falfely & vniuftly charged
with fuch a fclaunder r- Let vs therefore fcarche out the firft begin-<
ning of It. And if it (hall appeare , that it was dcuifed by the oncly
rallincffe of men , theo bidding it farewell, let v$ mealuretbettuc
obfcruation of baptifme by the onclywillof God. But if it flialbc
proued that it is not deftitutc of his certainc authoritie, we muft be-
warc,left in pinching the holy ordinaces of God, we bealfo klaun-^
dcrous asraiiift the author himfclfe.
z Firft !t IS a dodrine well enough knovven,and cofcfTcd among
all the godly,chat the right confideration of the (ignes,con(ifteth noc |
oncly in the outward Ceremonies : but principally hangcth vpon the
promire,and vppon the fpirituallmifteries,for figuring whereof the
Lorde ordeineth the Ceremonies themfelucs.Thc:rforc he that will
pcrfedly learneofwhat value baptifme is,towhat cnde ittcndcih,
finally what it is : let him not ftay his rliought vpon the elcmentc and -j
bodily fight : but rather let him raife it vp to the promifcs of God, "
which are therein ofFred vs,andto the imvardefecretes which ard
therein reprcfented vnto vs. He that knoweth tbefe things, hath at-
tcined the found truth of baptifmCjand the whole fubliancc thertufjj
as I may fo call it : and thereby alfo he ilialbe taught,whac is the rea-
fon, and what is the vfc of the outward fprinkling. Againe he that
contemptUoufly paflingouerthefe,i}iall hapc his ninuie wholly fa*
fllened & boundc to tlic viiible Cercm,oxiie,{hall vnderflandc neither
the force nor propertie of baptifme : nor yet fb much as this , what
the water meancth , or what vfe it hath. Wliich fcntence is pioQTc^
with fo many and fo cleare tcftimonics of Scripture , that we necdc
noc at this prcfcnt to tarry long about it.Thcrfore it remaineth noWjj
that we fckc out of the promifcs geucn in baptifme,what is the force i
and nature of it.The Scripture (heweth, that the clenfing of finnes,^
which we obieine of the blood of Chrift , is here firft {hewed : then
the mortifying of the ftcfti, which ftandeth vpon the partaking of his
death,by which thefaithfujl are regenerate into newnefleof Iife,yea! |
and into the fellowfhip of Chrift. To this fumme may be referred '
whatfbcuer is taught in the Scriptures concerning baptifme : fauing
that befide this it is a fignc to teftifie religion before men.
5 But forafmuch asbeforethc inftitution of baptifme,the people
of God had circumcifion in ftecdc thereof: let vs fe what rhcfe two
fignes differ the one from the other, and with what likenefTethcy
agree together .Whereupon may appeate what isthc relation of the
one
To Saluation. Lib.4. 553
ione to the other. Where the Lordc gaue circumcifion to Abraham Gcn.iy,
to be kept , he ccllcth him before, that he would be God to him and **
to his fcede : adding,that with him is the flowing ftore and fuffifance
of all things , that Abraham (hould accompt that his hande ihould
be-to him a fpring of all good things. In which wordes the promifc
of eternall hfe is conteined.-asChrift expoundeth it , bringing an
argument from hcnfe to prouc the immortahtie of the faiihfull, and
the refurredion. For God (faith he) is not the God of the dead,but
ofihehuing. Wherefore Paule alfo fhewmg to the Ephefians from M".**.
what dcftrudion the Lorde had dchuered them ,gathereth by this ^*;
that they had not bine admitted into the couenate of circumciiion, ^g *
that they were without Chrift,withouc God, without hopc>ftrangers Eph.t.
from the teftaments of the promiferall which things the couenante **•
it fclfe conteined. But the firfl accefle to God , the firft cntric to im-
mortall hfc,i$theforgcueneflcofiinne$. Whereupon is gathered,
that this forgeucneffe aunfwereth to the promifeof baptiline con-
cerning our clenfing . Afterwarde the Lorde takcth couenante of
Abraham that hcfhould walke before him in purcnefle and inno*
ccnccof hart : which belongcth to mortifying or regeneration. And
that no man^hould dout , that circumcifidn is a figncof mortifying*
Mofes in an other place doth more plainly declare it , when he ex- Dca>i«.
hortcth the people of Ifrael,to circumcife the vncircumcifed fkinne t€,
of the hart , becaufe they were fcuerally chofen to be the people of
God out of all the nations of the earth. As God, where he adoprcth
the pofteritie of Abraham to his people, comnraundeth them to be
circumcifed : fo Mofes pronounceth thatthe hartes ought to be cir- Den.?*
cumcifcd, declaring verily what is the trueth of this circumciiion. *'
Then that no man fhould endeuor toward it by his owne ftrength,
he teachcth that they neede the grace of God. All thefe things arc
fo often repeted of the Prophets,that I neede not to heape into this
place many teihmonies, which do echc where offer themfclues. Wc
haae proued thcrefote , that in circumcifion a fpirituall promife waf
vttercd CO the Fathers , fuch as in baptifme is geuen : forafmuch as it
floured to them the forgeuenefTe of £innes,and the mortifying of the
flefii Moreoucr aswehaue taught thatChrift is the fundationof
baptifme, in whom both thefe things remaine : fo it is euident that
he h alfbof circumciiion. For he is promiled to Abraham , and in
him the blcfling of all nations. To the fraling of which grace , the
fignc of circumcifion IS added.
4 Nowe we may eafilyfe, what there i? like in thefe two fignet^
or what there is differing. The promifcs* whereupon we hauc do*
AAA A
Cap.i ^* Of the outwardc mcancs
clarcd that the power of the figncs c6filtech,is all one in bothjnamc-
lyof the fatherly fauor of God, of the forgeacnelTe of finnes,of
3ife cueilafting. Then, the thing tigured alfo is all one and the fames
namely rcgeneration.Tlie fundation wherupon the fulfijlingof ihefc
things ftandeth, is all one in both. Wherefore there is no difference
in the inv/ardcmilkrie, whereby the whole force and proper tie of
the Sacraments is to be weyed.The vnhkcnefle that rcmaincth,licth
in the outward Ceremonic , which is the fmalUft portion : whereas
the chiefeft part hangcth vpon the promife and the thing fignified.
Therefore we may determine , that whatfoeucr agreeth with cir-
cumcjfion doth alfo belong to baptifme , except the difference of the
Roni,i> vifible Ceremonic- To this relation andcomparifon,the Apoftles
5* rule leadeth vs by the handc, whereby we are commaunded to exa-
mine all expofition of fcripturc by the proportio of faith. And truely
the trueth doth in this behalfe almo^ offer it fdfe to be felte.For as
circunKilion , becaufe it was a certainc rokcn to the Icwes $ whereby
they were certified that they were chofen to be the people and
houfeholde of God, and ihcy againe on their bchalucs profcfled
that they y elded themfelues to God, was their firft entric into the
Church :fo nowe alio we by baptifme enter into profcfljon of God^
that we may be reckned among his people , and mutually fweare to
his name. Wherby it appeareth out of controuerfic, that baptifme
is come into the place of circumciiion , that it may haue the fame
office with vs.
<; Nowe if we lift to fearch out, whether baptifme be lawfully ^
communicate to infantes: (hall we not fay that he doth to much ]
play the foole , yea dote , which will reft onely vpon the clement of '^
water, and the outward obferualion , but can not abide to bende his
minde to the fpirituall milterie? Whereof if there be any confidera-
tion had, it ihall without dout ccrtainely appeare that baptifme is
rightfully gcucn to infantes, as the thing that is due vnto them. For
th^ Lorde in olde time did not vouchcfaue to admit them to circum-
ciSon , but that he made them partakers of all thofe things which
were then (ignined by circumcifion. Othcrwifc he fhould with mere
dcceiccs haue mocked his people, if he had fed them with deccitfull
iignes, which is horrible euen to be heard of.Forhe pronounccth
cxprefly , that the ci rcumcifioSof a litlc infante fhould be in fteede
of a feale to fcale thcpromife of the couenvint. But if the couenant
remainc vnbroken and ftecdfaft , it doth at this day no lefTc belong
to the children of Chriftians , than vnder the olde teftament it per-
tcined to the infantes of the Icwcs. But if ihcy be partakers of the
thing
#^-
To Saliiatfon. Lib.4, ." 554
tiling fignificd, why (hall ihcy be debarred from thefigne? ifchcy
liauc the trueih , why (hall they be put backe from the figure? Al-
though the outward fi^ne cleaue faft togetlier with the word in the
Sacrament , (o that they can not be plucked in fonder : yet if they
belcucrally colidered,whcther of them,I pray you,{halI weefteemc
of more value ? Trudy <ith we fc that the ligne ferueth the word, wc
muil fay thatitisvnderit, andmuftfet it in the inferior place. Sith
therefore the word of Baptifme is extended to infantes : why fliall
the lignc,that is to fay,the addition hanging to the word,be debarred
from them? This one reafon,if there were no mo, were aboundanc-
\y enough to confute all them that will fpeake to the contrary. That
which isobiededjthat there was a day certainely fetfor circum-
cifion,JS altogether but a (hift. We grauntcthat wc be not nowc
^ounde to ccrtaine daye$,like the lewes : but when the Lorde,how"
fociier he certainely appomtcth no day , yet deciareth that he is
plcafed that infantes ftiould wiih a folemne formal vfagc bereceiued
in to his coucnant : what feke wc more?
6 Howbcit the Scripture opencth vnto vs yet a ccrtainer kno w^
ledge of the truth? For it is moft euideni , that the coucnant which
the Lorde ones made with Abraham, is at this day no Icffe m force
to Chriftians, than it was in olde time to the lewilh people : yea and
that this word hath no Icffe refped: to Chriftians , than it then had
rcl'ped to the lewes. VnlelTe parhappes we thinke, that Chrift hath
by his comming diminiflicd ,orcut {hort the grace of his Father.
Which faying is not without abhominable blafphemie. Wherefore
as eucn the children of the lewes were called a holy fcede , becaufc
being made heires of the fame coucnant they were made differing
from the children oi the vngodly : for tl>e fame realbn euen yet alfo
the children of Chriftians are accompted holy , yea although they
be the iffue but of one parent faithful! ; and ( as the Ap< ftle witncf iXor.
fcth) they differ fix)m the vndeane feedc of idolatrers. Nowe when q !*' -
the Lord immcdiatly after the couenant made with Abraham,com -
maundcd the fame to be fealed in infantes with an outward Sacra-
ment : what caufc will Chriftians allege, why they ihouJd not at this
day teftifie and feale the fame in their children f Nether let any man
obied againft me, that the Lorde commaunded his couenant to be
confirmed with no other fignc than of circumcifion , which is long
agoe taken away. For we haue in rcdineffe to aunfwerc, thar for the
time of the olde teftamcnt he ordeined circumcifion to confirmc his
couenant : but circumcifion being tPken away, ycr alwiy remamctk
the fame mancr of confirming which wc iiauc common with the
AAAA i|
11.
Cap,
,16. Of the outwardc meancs
Icwcs. Wherefore wc mutt alw,*y diligently confider what is comon
to both, and what they haue feueiall from vs. The couenant is com-
mon,the caule of confirming icis common.Oncly the maner of con«fc
firming is diuerfe,bccaufccircumciiion was that to them , in place
whereof baptifmc hath fucceded among vs. Ochcrwife ifthctdli-
monie 5 whereby the Icweswcre aflured of the fjluation of their
feedc,bc taken awayfromv$,it{houldbe brought to paflc by the
comming of Chri{l,thacthe grace of God fliould be darker and lefle
approued by tcftimonies to vs ,than it was before to the lewes. If
that can not be faid without extreme fclaundcr of Chritt , by whom
the infinite goodneflc of the Father hath more clercly and liberally
than euer heretofore bine poured fourth vpon the earth,& declared
tomen:wemuft needesgraunt, thatit is at the left not more pin-
chingly to be fuppreffcd , nor to be fet foorth with iefle teftimonie,
than it was vnder the datke fhadowcs of the lawe.
7 Wherefore the Lorde Iefus,minding to fliewe a token where-
by the world might vndcrftande that he was come rather to enlarge
than to hmit ibc mercy of God, gently embraced children offred
vnto him , rebuking the difciples which went about to forbid them
to come to him :forafmuch as they did leade thofe , to whom the
kingdomc of heauen belong 'th , away from him by whome alone
Mattt^. the entric is open into heancn. But ( will fomc man fay ) what hke
I i» thing hath baptifme with this embracing of Chrift. For neither is it
reported that he Baptifed the, but that he receiued them, embraced
them,and wilhed them well.Therfore if we lift to followe his exam-
{)le » lette vs helpe infantes with prayer , but not baptifc them. But
et vs wey the doinges of Chrift fomwhat more hedefolly, than fuch
kindeof men do. Forneitheristhis to be hghtly paffed ouer , that
Chrift commaundeth infantes to be brought vnto him , adding a
reafon why,becaufc of fuch is the kingdomc of heauen. And after-
war de he witnelTcth his will with deede , when embracing them he
commendcth them to his Father with his prayer and blefling.If it be
mete thatinfantes be brought to Chrift, why is it not alfo mete that
they be receiued to baptifme , the figne of our communion and fel-
lowfhip with Chrift^ If thekingdome of heauen be theirs, why ftiall
the figne be denied them , whereby there is as it were an entric o-r
pened into the Church , that being admitted into it they may be itd-i
nombred among the heires of the heauenly kingdome ? Howe vniuft
fhali wc be, if we dr.ue away them whom Chrift calleth vnto him?
if wc fpoile them, whom he garniftieth with his gyfics ? if we ihuttc
out them whom he willingely receiuechi*But if we will examine howe
much
To Saluation. Lib.4. 555
much that which Chiift there did, difFcrcth from baptifmc, yet o£
howc much greater price fhall we hauc baptifmc , (whereby we te-
(tide chac infantes are conteincd in the couenantof God) than re-
ceiuing,embracing,Iayeng on of handcs,and prayer,whcreby Chrift
himfeif being pre(enc:dcclai ech that tlicy both are his, and arc fane-
tificd of him? By the other cauillaiios, whereby they labor to mocke
out this place , they do notliing but bewray their ownc ignorance.
For they gather an argument of this which Chrift faith . Let title
ones come ro me,that they were in age good bigge ones which were
already able to go. But they arc called of the Euangeliftcs , brephe,
and paidia,by which wordcs the Grckes do fignifie babes yet hanging
on the brelb . Therefore this word ( to come) is fimply let for (to
haue accefle. ) Lo what fnares they are compelled to make , which
are growen hard againfl the truth. Nowe where they fay , that the
kingdome of heauen is notgeucn tothem,butto fuchasbelike
them,becaufc it is fayed to be of fuch,not of them: that is no founder
than the reft.For if that be graunted,whatmaner of rcafon fliall the
rcafon of Chrift be, whereby hemcancth to fhewe , that infantes
in age are not ftrangers from him? When he commaundeth that
infantes be fuffered to haue acceffe vnto him, nothing is plainer than
that very infancy in deede is there fpoke of. And that this ftiould not
(eeme an abfarditic > he by and by addeth : of fuch is the kingdome
of heauen. But if it muft needes be that infantes be comprehended
herein , it muft be plaine that by this word (Such) are meant very
infantes themfelueSjand fuch as be like them.
S Nowe there is no man that fceth not , that Baptifmc of in-
fantes was not framed by man , which is vpholdcn by Co great ap-
prouing of Scripture . Neither do they colorably enough play the
fooles, which obied that it is no where foundc , that any one infant
was baptifed by the handcs of the Apoftles. For although it be not Aft,itf.
cxpreffly by name rchcarfed of the Euangeliftcs : yet becaufc a- » 5- and
gaine they are not excluded , (b ofteas mention happenethtobc ^**
made of the baptifing of any houfeholde:who,rnlefte he be madde^
can rcafon thereupon that they were not baptifed ? If fuch argu-
ments were of any force, women ftiould be forbidden to partake of
the Lordes fupper , whom we readc not to haue bene rcceiued vnto
it in the time of the A poftles.But here we be contente with the rule
of faith. For when we con(idcr,whatthcinftitution ofthe Supper
recjuircthithereby alfo we may cafily iudgc to whom the vfe thereof
ought to be communicated. Which we obferue alfo in baptifmc. Foe
Vrhcn wc maike i to what cndc ic was ordeined , we cuidently efpy^
A AAA iij
Cap. 1 6. Of the outwardc mcanes
that It bclongeth no Icffc to infantcs,ihan to elder folkes.Thcrcforc
they can not be depriued of it, but that the will of the author muH:
be manifeftly defrauded. But whereas they fpred abrode among the
fimplc people , that there paffed a long roawe of yearcs after the
rcfutredion of Chrift jin which the baptifme of infantes was vn*
knowcn;therein they moft fowly do lie. For there is no writer fo olde,
that doth not certainly rcfcrrc the beginning thereof to the time of
the Apoftles. .
9 Nowe remaineth that we brecfcly fhcwc , what fruit com-
meth of this obferuation ,both to the faithful! which prefent theif
children to the Church to be baptifed,and alfo to the infantes them-
felues that be baptifed with the holy water : that no man flioulde
dcfpife it as vnprofitable or idle. But if it come in any mans minde,
vpon this pretence to mocke at the baptifme of infantes , he fcor-
neth the commaundement of Circumcifion geuenby the Lordc.
For what will they bring forth to impugnc the baptifme of infanteSg
which may r«ot alfo be ihrowen backe againft Circumcifion ? So the
Lorde takcch vengeance of their arrogance, which do by and by
condemnethat which they comprehend not with the fenfe of their
owne fledie . But God furniflieth vs with other armures , whereby
their fpoliihneiTe may be beaten flatt. For neither this his holy in-
ftitution,by which we feele our faith to be«holpcn with Angular
comfort , defcrueth to be called fuperfluous. For Gods Ggne com-
municaced to a childe doth as it were by an cmprinted feale cofirmc
the promifc geucn to the godly parcnte , and dedareth that it is ra-
tified that the Lorde will be God not onely to him but ^Ifo to his
feede,and will continually (hewe his good will and grace, not to
him qnely , but alfo to his pofteritie cuen to the thoufandth gene-
ration. Where when the great kmdnefle of God vtteieth it felfc,
firftit yeldeth moft large matter to aduaunce his glorie* and ouer-
fpreadeth godly hartes with lingular gladnefle , becaufe they arc
therewithal! more carneftly moued to louc againe fo godly a Fa- j
ther , whom they fee to haue care of their pofteritie for their fakes. ^
Neither do I regarde , if any man take exception ,and lay that the -
promife ought to fuffife toconfirmethc faluation of our children: 1
iorafmuchas it hath pleafed God othcrwifc , whoc ashcknoweth
our weakneflejWillcd in this bchalfe (o much to bcare tenderly with
it. Therefore let them that embrace the promife of Gods mercy to
be extended to their children , thmke that it is their duetie to ofifer
them to the Church to be (igned with the figne of mercy ,3nd ther-
by to encourage themfelues to a more allured contidence , bccaufe
they
To Saluation. Lib.4. 55^
they do with pre(ent eye bcholdc the couenant of the Lordc grauen
in the bodies of their children. Againc,thc children receiiie feme
cotnmoditie of their baprifme, that being engrafFed into the body
©f the Churchjthey be fomwhat the more commended to the other
membrcs. Then when they are growen to riper age, they be there-
by not fclcndcily llirrcd vp to earncll endeuor to worfnip God , of
whom they haue bene rcceiued into his children by a folcmne iignc
of adoption , before that they coulde by age acknowe him for their
Farher. Finally that fame condemnation ought greatly to make vs Gffn«^7'
afraidcjthat God will take vengeance of it, if any man delpife to '"*•
marke his fonne with the (ignc of the couenantjbccaufc by fuch con-
tempt the grace ofFrcd is refufcd and as it were foifwornc,
10 Nowe let vs examine the arguments , whereby cenainc fu-
rious beaftes do not cefle to aflailc this holy inilitution of God. Firft
becaufe they fee that they be cxcedingly nere driuen and hard
ftrained with the likenefle of baptifme and Circumcifion, they labor
to pluckc in fonder thefc two figncs with great idifierence , that the
one ihould not feeme to haue any thing common with the other.
For they fay that both diucrs things are hgnified,and that the coue-
nant is altogether diuers, and that the naming of the children is noc
all one. But while they go about to proue that firft point, they allege
that Circumcifion was a figure of mortification and not of baptifme.
Which verily we do moft willingly graunt them. For u maketh very
well for our fide. Neither do we vfe any other profe of our fcntencc,
than that Baptifme and Circumcifion arc fignes of mortification.
Hereupon we determine that Baptifme is fet in the place of Cir»
cumcifion , that infhould reprcfentc vnto vs the fame thing which
inoldetimc it fignifiedto thelewcs. In affirming the difference of
the couenant, with howe barbarous boldneffe do they turmoilc
and corrupt the Scripture: and that not jn one place alone , butfo
as they leaue nothing fafc or whole? For they depainte vnto vs the
lewes fo to be carnall that they be liker bcafts than men : with whom
forfooth the couenant made procedeth not beyondc thctcmporall
life,to whom the promifes gcuen do reft in prefen: and bodily good
things. If this dodrine take place , what rcmameth but that the na-
tion of the lewes were for a time filled with the benefits of God,
none othcrwife than as they fatce a hcarde of fwinc in a ftic , that at
length they fhould perifh with etcrnall damnation. Forfofoneas
we 3llcge Circumcifion and the promifes annexed vnto it, ihcy
aunfwere that Circumcifion was a lit;terall fignc , and the promifc*
thereof were carnall
AAAA iitj
Cap.i^. Of the outward mcancs
1 1 Trudy if Circumcifion was a literall (igne,therc is no other-
wife to be thought of baptifmc. For the Apoftle in the fecondc
Colo 2. Chapter to the Colollians makeththc one no more fpirituallthan
»• the other. For he faith that we are circumcifed in Chrift, with a cir-
cumcifion not made with handcputting away the body of finne that
dwelled in our flcfh: which he callcth the circumcifion of Chrift.
Afterward for declaration of that faying , he adioineth , that we be
buried with Chrift by baptifme. What mcaneth he by thefe wordes,
but rhat the fulfilling and truth of baptifme , is alfo the truth and
fulfillmgofcircumcifion.becaufe they figure both one thing? For
he trauailcth to lhcwe»that baptifme is the fame to Chriftians, which
Circumcifion had bene before to the lewes. But forafmuch as we
hauc nowe euidently declared , that the promifes of both the fignes,
and the mifterics that are reprefcnted in them,do agree together, wc
will for this prefcnttary no longer vpon them. Onely I will put the
faithfull in minde i that though I holde my peace , they Ihould wey
with themfelues whether it be taken for an earthly and literall fignc,
vnder which nothing is contcined but fpirituall andheauenly. But,
that they fliould not fell their fmokes to the fimpic , we wiil by the
way confute one obiedion wherewith they colour this moft fhamc-
Icfle lie. It is moft certaine that the principall promifes, wherein was
conteined the coticnat which in the Olde teftament God ftablilhed
with the Ifraehtes , were fpirituall, and tended to eternall life : and
then againe , that they were recciued of the fathers fpiritually , as it
was mete, that they might thereof receiue affiance of the life to
come , whereunto they longed with the whole afFeftion of their
hart. But in the meane time we denic not , but that he witncflcd his
good will towarde them with earthly and carnall benefites:by which
alfo we fay that the fame promife of fpirituall things was confirmed.
Ccn.i^ As when he promifcd cucrlaftingc blefledncffc to his feruant A-
«.&iS.braham,thathe might fct before his eyes amanifeft token of his
fauor, he addcih an other promife concerning the pofleffion of the
lande of Chanaan. After this maner we ought to vnderftandc all the
earthly promifes that are geuen tothclewilh nation , that the fpi-
rituall promife, as the hed,whcreunto they are dircdcd, fliould alway
haue the chiefe placc.But fith I hauc more largely entreated of thefe
things in the difterencc of the ncwe and olde teftament, therefore
nowe I do the more flightly knittc it vp.
iz In the naming of the children they finde this diuerfityjthat in ,
the olde teftament they were called the children of Abraham,which ;
iflfued of his fcedcsbut chat nowe they arc called by that Dame,which
followc
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 557
follow his faith: And chat therefore that carnail infancy, which was
by circumcinon graffcdinto the fclowfhip of the coucnant, figured
the infantes of the Newc tcftamcnt , which are regenerate by the
word of God to immortall hfe.In which wordcs we beholde in dede
a fmall fparcle of trueth ; but herein thefe hght fpiritcs greuoufly of-
ftnde , that when they catchc holde of thai which lirft comracth to
their hande, when they fliould go further and compare many things
togcthcr,thcy ftande ftifly vppon one word. Whereby it can not o- ^ .
thcrwife bebutihat they muft fomctime be deceiued which reft v- jg**
pon the found knowledge of nothingc. We graunt m dccde that the Rom.^.
carnall fccde of Abraham did for a time holde the place of the fpiri- « a,
tuall fcde which is by faith graffcd into him.For wc be called his chil-
dren howcfbeuer there is no naturali kinrcd betwcne htm and vs.
But if they mcanc , as they plaincly iliewc that they do , that there
y/2S ncucr fpirituall bleffingr promifed to the carnall fecde of Abra-
ham,herein they are much deceiued. Wherefore wc muft leueJl to a
better marke, whcrunto we are dircdcd by the moft ccrtaine guiding
of the Scripture. The Lord therefore promifed to Abrabam,that he
(hould haue a feede , wherein all nations of rhe earth (halbe bleffcd:
and therewithall affurcth him , that he woulde be a God to him and
his fecde. Whofocucrdo by Faith recciue Chrift the author of blef-
iinge, are heires of this promife^and therforc are called the children
of Abraham.
1 5 But although (incc the rcfurre^io of Chrift the boiidcs of the
kingdomc of God haue begon to be farrc and wide enlarged into all
nations without diflfcrence.that accordinge to the fayinge of Chrift,
faithful ones fhould be gathered from euery part to fie dov/ne in the
heauenly glory with Abraham, Ifaac,and Iacob:yet he had many a- MaccIL
ges before cxtende^thai fame fo great mercy to the Icwes.And be- » «• \
caufepaflingeouer ail other, he had chofen out that only nation, in ^^••'fl
which he would reflrainc his grace for a time> called them his pccu- '*
har po(rcirion,and his purchafed people. For tcftifying of fuch libe-
rality ,Circumcifion was giucn by the fignc whereof the lewei might
be taught that God is to them the author of faluation : by which
knowledge their mindes were raifcd into hope of cternall life . For
vhat (hall he want, whom God hath once receiucd into his charge?
Wherefore the Apoftle mcaninge to proue that the Gentiles were
the children of Abraham as well as the lewes , fpeaketh in this ma-
ncr : Abraham(faith he)was iuftificd by faith in vncircumcifion. Af-
terward he rcceiued the fignc of circumcifio,the feale of the righte- Ronui,
ouIhciTc of fjLich^ihat he ftiould be cbc father of ail the faithful^bocb '^
C/ap.i 6. Ut tnc outward mcancs
alfo after the rcfurredion of Chrift , he iudgeth that the promife of
the couenat is to be fulfilled,noc only by way of allegory ,but as the
▼cry words do foundjio the carnall fecde of Abraham. To the fame
Aft.». cntcnt fcructh that which Peter in the fccond Chapter of the Ad:s,
'*• declareth to the Icwes,that the benefit of the Gofpell is due to them
and their feede by right of the couenant,& in the Chapter next fo-
Aft. |. lowingc he calicth them the children of the Teftament,that is to fay
g'; heires . From which alfo not much difaccordeth the other place of
j^ * ' the Apoftie abouc allcaged, where he accompteth & fetteth Circum-
cifion cmprinted m infantes,for a teftimony of that comunion which
they hauc with Chrift . But if wc harkcn to their trifles , what fhalbe
wrought by that promifejwhereby the Lorde in the fccond article of
his law vndertaketh to his feruantSt that he will be fauorable to their
feede cuen to thcthoufandth generation? Shall we here flee to al-
legories?But that were too trifling afliift.Or {hal wc fay that this is a-
boliflied?But fo the law fhould be dcftroicd,which Chrift came rather
toftabli(h,fofarrcasitturneth vsto goodvntolifc.Letittherforcbc
out of c6trouer(ic,that God is fo good & libcrall to his,that for their
fakes^he will hauc alfo their children^whom they fhal beget,io be ad«
numbred among his people.
\6 Moreoucr the differcccs which they go about to put betwcne
baptifme and circumci(ion,arc not only worthy to be laughed at,and
▼Old of all colour of reafonjbut alfo disagreeing with themfelues.For
vhen they hauc affirmed that baptifme hath relation to the firft day
of the fpirituall battell^buc circumciiio to the eighth when mortifica-
tion is already cnded,byandby forgetting the fame,thcy turne their
rongc> and call circumcifion a figure of the flefh to be mortified, but
baptifme they call buriall , into which none are to be put till they be
already dead. What dotages of phrentikemen,can with fo great light-
ncffcleape into fundry diuerfities? For in the firft fentence,baptifmc
muft go before circumcifion': by the other, it is thruft backe into the
later place. Yet is it no new example.that the wits of men be fo tof-
fed vp and downe,whcn in ftcede of the moft certaine word of God
they worlhip whatfoeuer they hauc dreamcd.Wc therefore fay that
that former difference is a meere drcamc. If they lifted to expoundc
by way of allegory vpoy eighth day,yet it agreed not in that maner.
It were much fitter, accordinge to the opinion of the oldc writers,to
rcfcrre the number of eight to the refurrcdion which was done on
the eighth day,whereupon wc know that the newneflc of life hang-
cth:or to the whole courfe of this prefentlife, wherein mortification
ought alway to go forwardc • cdl when life is ended ^ mortification ic
To Saluation. Lib.4. 55^
feire may alfo be ended. Howcbcic God may fccmc to haue minded
to prouidc for the tendcrneflc of age, in diffcrring circumcifion the
eighth day , becaufc the wound {hould haue bin more dangerous to
the children new borne and yet red from their mother. How much
ftronger is that,that we being deade bcfore,arc buried by bapcifmc:
when the Scripture expreflely crieth to the contrary that we are bu-
ried into death to this entent,that we Hiould dye, and from thenfc*
forth fhoulde endeuour to this mortification ? Now, a hkewife han-
dhngc It is, that they cauill that women ought not to be bapti(ed,if
baptifme muft be framed like to circumcifion . For if it be moft cer-
tainc that the fandifyinge of the fecde of Ifraell was teftified by the
figne of circumcifion:thercby alfo it is vndouted,th3t it was giuen to
fandific both males & females.But the only bodies of male children
were marked with it, which might by nature be marked : yet Co chat
the wome were by them after a ccrtaine mancr companions & part-
ners of circumcifio. Therfore fending far away fuch folhes of their^
let vs ftickc faft in the likenes of baptifme & circumcifion, which wc
moi^ largely fee to agree in the inward myftery , in the proroifes, ia
vfe,in eftedualncflc.
1 7 They thmkc alfo that they bring foorth a moft ftrong reafon,
why children are to be debarred from baptifme, when they alleagc
that they are not yet for age able to vnderftandc the myfterie there
lignificd.Thatis fpirituall regeneration, which can not be in the firft
infancy. Therefore they gather , that they are to be taken for none
other than the children of Adam } till they be growen to age mete
for a fecond birth. But the trueth of God echwherc fpeaketh againft
all thcfe things.For if they be to be left among the cbildrc of Adamt
then they are left in death : forafmuch as in Ada we can do nothing
but die. But contrariwife Chrift commaundeth'them to be brought
vnto him. Why fo?becaufc he is life: Therefore that he may giuc life
10 them,he maketh them partakers of himfelfe.when in the meane
time ihefc fellowcs driuinge them farreawaydo adiudge them to
death. For if they fay for a ihift, that infantes do not therefore perifli '
if they be accompted the childre of Adam,their errour is abundant*
ly confuted by witncflc of the Scripture . For where as it pronoun^
ccth that all do die in Adam , it foloweth that there rcmaineth no
hope of life but in Chrift. Therefore that we may be made heires of p
life,we muft communicate with him. Againe when it is wrytten in an ,*j.,,*
other place, that by nature we are all fubied to the wrath of God,& Eph.i.f^
conceiued in finne, whereunto damnation perpetually cleaueth:wc ^ Jx»T«
muft depart out of our ownc nature , before that the entry be opea
Cap.i^. Of the outward meanes
to vs into the kingdom of God. And what can be more plainely fpo*
t.Cor. keujthan that flelh and blood can not poHeHe tlie kingdom of God?
15.J0. Theretore let all be done away whatioeuer js ours ( which CraW not
be done without regeneration ) then we (hall fee th.is polfelTionof
loh.iz. the kingdom. Finally ifChrift lay truely, when here porteth that he
»$.&24 is life, It IS ncccflary that we be grafted into htm, that we may be de-
i* liucred out of the bondage of death. But (fay thcy)hovv are infantes
regenerate , which arc not endued with knowledge neither of good
nor of euillrBut we anfwere,that the work of God is not yetno work
at all , although it be not fubie^ to our capacity. Moreoucr it is no-
thing doutfuUjthat the infants which arc to be raucd(as veiily of that
age fome are faued ) arc before regenerate of the Lorde. For if they
Kea.ai' bring with them from their mothers wombe the corruption natural-
Epb.2.3 ^y P^^^ted in them:they muft be purged thereof, before that they be
pi. J1.7 admitted into the kingdom of God , whcrinto nothing entreth that
is defiled or fpotted. If they be borne linncrs>as both Dauid and Paul
affirme : either they remaine out of fauour and hatefull to God , of
they muft nedes be iuftified.And what feekc we morc,when the iudge
Ion.3.3 himielfe openly affirmeth that the entiie into heauenly life is open
to none but 10 them that be borne againe } And to put fuch carpers
to filencc, he (hewed an example in lohn the baptift, whom he (an-
^ified in his mothers wombe,what he was able to do in the reft. Nei-
ther do they any thinge preuaile by the fliift wherewith ihey here
fnocke, that that was but oncedonerwhereuponit doth not byandby
folowc that the Lorde is wont commonly to do fo with infantes. For
neither do wcreafon after thatmaner; onely our purpofe is to fhcw^
that the power of God is by them vniuftly and enuioufly limited
within thofc narrowe boundes within which it fufFieth not it felfc to
be boundc. Their other bylhift is euen of as great weight. They al-
Icage that by the vfuall mancr of the Scripture, this word (from the
wombe5)is as much in efl'ed, as if it were faydjfrom childhoode. But
we may clearcly fec,that the Angel when he declared the fame to Za-
r***' • chary, meant an other thing:that is , that it which was not yet borne,
(hould be filled with the holy Ghoft. Let vs not therefore attempt
to appoint a lawe to God , but that he may fandifie whom it pleafed
him , as he fandtificd this child , forafmuch as his power is nothing
Hiinifhed. ,.■.;
18 And trucly Chrift was therefore fandified from his fii ftinfart^'
cy,thathc might fandtifie in himfelfe his eledoui of euery age wifh-
outdifTerencc.For aSjtodoaway the fault of difobcdience which had
bin commiccedin our flefh) he hath put on the fame ficih vpqnlvim'*
fcifc
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 5^0 !
fclTcthat he mighc in it for vs and in our ftcde performe pcrfcd obc- |
dicncc:fo he was conceiued of the holy Ghoft,that hauingc the holi-
ncflc thereof fully poured into him in the flcflie which he had uken
vppon him , he might poure fooi th the fame into vs. If we haue in
Chrift a moft perfcd paicrne of all the graces which God continu-
ally fheweth to his childrc»vcrily in this bchalfe alfo he Hialbe a profe
vnto vs , chat the age of infancy is not fofarre vnHc for fandlitication.
But howefocucr it be, yet this wc hold out of controuer(ic,that none
of the cled is called out of this prcfent life , which is not firft made
holy and regenerate by the Spiritc of God . Whereas they obieA
to the contrary,that in the Scriptures the Spirite acknowledgeth no
other regeneration but of incorruptible fccdc,that is,of the word of
God : they do wrongefully expounde thatfayinge of Peter,whcre- i.Pcct
in he comprehendeth onely the faithfuU which hadde bin taught by a j,
preaching of the Gofpcll . To fuch in deede we graunc that thcword
of the Lordc is the ooely feede of fpirituall regeneration;but wc deny
thatitoughttherupontobe gathered,thac infantes cannot be rege-
nerate by the power of God, which is to him as eaHc & ready as to vs
it is incomprchenfiblc and wonderfull. Moreouer it (houldc not be
fafc enough for vs to take this away from the Lorde, that he may not
be able to ihewc himfelic to be knowcn to chcm by whatfocuer way
he wil.
19 But Faith.fay they,is by hearingCjWhcrcof they haoc not yet
gotten the vfejncither can they be able to knowe God,whom Mofcs d^^,,
ccacheth to be deftitute of the knowledge both of good and euilL }j>.
But they conlider not that the Apoille , when he maketh hearing the
beginnmg of faith, defcribcth onely the ordinary diftribution of the
Lorde and difpotition which he vfeth to keepe in cailinge them that
be his:but appointeth nor to him a perpetuall rule , that he may not
v(e any other way. Which way verily he hath vfcd in the callinge of
many , to whom he hath giucn the true knowledge of himfelfc by an
inward maner, by the enlightening of the Spirite, without any prea-
cbinge vCcd formeane thereof. But whereas they thinkc it {halbe t
great abfurditie , if any knowledge of God be giucn to infantes, from
whom Mofes takcth away the vndcrftanding of good and euilhl be-
fech them to aunfwcre me, what danger is there if they be faid to re-
ceiue fome part of that grace, whereof a little after they fhal enioy the
full plentifulnes.For if the fulnes of life ftandeth in the perfed know-
ledge ot God , when many of them , whom in their very Hsfl infancy
death byandby takcih awayjdo p.^fTe into eternall hfe,rrucly they ar^
cccciued to bchoide the moft prefem face of Qod. Whom thercfoie
Cap.i^. Of the outward mcahcs
the Lordc will enlighten with the full brightncfie of his light , why
may he not prcfcntly alfojiFic fo plcafe him, fcnde out to fhine ypon
them fome Imall fparclc thereof; fpccially if he do not firft vncloth
them of ignorance,before that he take them out of the prifon of the
flefhe ? Not that I meane raihly to affirme that they be endued witb
the fame Faith which wc feele in our felues, or that they hav-c alto-,
gethcr like knowledge of faith: (which I had rather leauc in fufpeDfc)
but fomwhat to reftraine their foolifh arrogance, which according as
their mouth is puffed vp with fulnes,do boldely deny or afHrme they
care not what.
^o But that they may yet ftandc more ftrongly in this point, they
adde,that bapcifme is a Sacrament of repentance and of Faith; wher-
fore fith neither of thefe can befall in tender infancy,wc ought to be*
ware Icaft if they be admitt'^d to the communion of baptifme,thc it-
gnification of it be made voyde and vaine.But thefe dartcs are thro*
wen rather againft God than agamli vs. For it is moft euident by ma<
ny teftimonies of Scripture > that circuracihon alfo was a figne of re-
ltom.14 pcntance. Moreouer it is called of Paule the fealc of the righteoufnct
I. of Faith.Let therefore a reafon be required of God himfclfe why he
commaunded it to be marked in the bodies of infantes. For fith bap-
tifme and circumcition are both in one cafe,they can giuc nothing to
the one but that they muft alfo therewithal! graunt the fame to the
other. If they lookc backe to their wonted ftartingc hole, that then
by the age of infancy were figured Ipirituall infantes,the way is alrea-
dy flopped vp agaiitft them . Wc fay therefore , (ich God hath com-
municated to infantes circumcifion a Sacrament of repentance and
Faith , it feemeth no ahfurdity if they be made partakers of baptifme:
vnlcflc they hft openly to rage againft the ordinance of God . But
both in all the doings of God,& in this felfe fame doing alfo (hineth
wifdom and right eoufneffc enough,to beate downc the backebiiings
of the wicked. For though infantes,at the fame inftant that they were
circumcifedjdid not comprehcnde in vnderftandini^c what that figne
meant'.yct they were rruely circumcifed into the moitificatio of their
corrupt and defiled n?cure , in which mortification they Ihould after-
ward exercife ihemfelucs when they were growen to riper agc.Final-
\y ir is very eafie to afToyle this obiedion , with fayinge that they he
baptifed into repentance and Fay th to come; which although ihey be
not formed in tliem, yet by fecrete workinge of the Spirite the fcedc
of both lyeth hidden in them. With this anfwcre at once is ouerthro-
Mren whatfoeucr they wrcft againtt vs which they hauc fetched out of
the fignification of baptifmc.Of which forcis chat title wherewith ic
it
ToSaluation. Lib4. 5<^i
IS commended of Paul, where he callcth it the walhing of regcnera* Tit 5. $.
lion and ofrcnuingc. Whereupon they gather that it i$ to be giuen
10 none hut to fuch a one as is able to coiiceiue thofc things. But wc
on the contrary fide may anr>.vcre,that neither was circucifion which
betokened regeneration, to be giacn to any other than to them that
were regenerate. And To {hall we condemne the ordinance of God.
Wherforc(as wc hauc already touched in diuerfe places) whatfocuer
argumenttfs «Jo rcndc to the (hakinge of circumciiion, they haue no
force in the fflaiiingc- ofbaptifmc. Neither do they fo eH-apc 3way,if
they fay that wc ought to take that for determined & ccrtainc,which
ftandctH vpon the authority of God, although there appcarc no rca-
fon of ic:which reuerencc is not due to the baptifmc of infantes,noc
to fuch other things which be not commedcd vnto vs by the cxpreifc
word of God:{itluhcy are ftiU fait holden with this double arguniet.
For the commaundcment of God concerning infantes to he circum-
cifed.Vvas cither lawfull & fubied to no cauillations, or worthy to be
found fault wichall. If there were no inconuenicncc nor abfurdity in
the commaundcment of circumcifion, neither can there any abliir-
dity be noted in obferuing the b-jpiiimc of infantes.
zi As for the fpot of abfurdity winch in this place they go about
to lay vpon it,we thus wipe it away. Whom the Lord hath vouchfa-
ued to cledj if hauingc recciucd the (ignc of regeneration , they dc-
parte out of this prcfeht life before that they be come to riper age,
he renueth them with the power of his Spiritc incomprchcnfible
to vs, in fuch manner as he alone forefccth to be expedient It they
chaunce to erow vp to age, whereby they may be taught the trueth
of baplifme^they (hal hereby be the more enkindled to the endeuor
ofrcnuingc > the token whereof they (hall learnc to haue bin giuen
them from their firft infancy,that ticy fliould cxcrcife themfelues in
it throughout y whole courfe of then life.To the fame cntcnt ought _
that to be applied which Paulc teachcth in two places 1 that by bap - ^- ^j^ ^
tifme we are buried together with Chrift. For he doth notmeanc 1%
thereby, that he which is to be bsptifed, muft be already firft buried
together with Chrift; but fimply dcclarcth what dodrinc is cotamed
vnder baptifmc, yea & that to them char be already baptifcd.fo that
very mad men wouldc not afBimc by this place that it goct-ibetorc
baptifmc. After this maner Mofes & t 'C Prophets did pu: the people
in mind what circucilion meant, wh ct with vet they had bin marked
whilcthcy wereinfantcs, Of thclam-eftcdalfois thatwhsch he
writcth to the Galatians, that rhty when they were baptilcd, did put g*|«, » .
en Chrift. To what cndc?verily that they fliould from thenie fooith 17.
Cap. 1 6. Of the outward mcnncs
liue Co Chriftjbccauie they had not hxicd before. And although in the
older fort the rccciuing of the figne ought to follow the vndcrttan-
dingofy myttcry .-yet it ihalbc byandby declared that infants ought
to be othcrwife eftecmcd & accompted of. And no othccwife ought
i.Pet.j. we toiudgeofy placcof Peter,in which they thinke chat they bauc
ji. aftrong holdrwhen he faith that it is not a wafhing to wipe away the
fiUhincffcsof the body»but the witnefTc of a good confcicncc before
God,by the rcfurredion of Chrift. They in deeck; do gather there-,
by,th« nothing is left to the baptifme of infantes, but that it (hould
be a vaine fmokc^amely from which this trueth is farrc di(\ant. But
they often offend in this errour,that they will haue the thing in or-
der of iiwc to go alway before the (igne.For the trueth of circumci-
iion alfo confined of the fame witneffe of good c5fciencc.If it ought
of nectfiity to haue gone before, infantes (hould neucr haue bin cir-
cumcifcd by the commaundement of God. But he fhewingc that the
witneffe of a good confcience was contained vndcr the trueth 6f cir-
cumcifion, & yet therewithal! alfo commaunding infantes to be cir-
cumcifed , doth in y point iufhciently declare that circumciiionis ap*
plied to the time to come. Wherfore there is no more prefcnt effe-
^ualncstobc requircdin baptifme of infantSj^hay it fhould cofirmc
& ftabliih the couenat made by the Lord with them. The reft of the
^gnificationof that Sacrament (hall afterward folowatiuchtime as
God himfclfe forcfeeih.
ai Now I thinke there is no man,that doth not clcarely fee that
all fuch reafons of theirs arc mere nufconft-^iogs of Scripcuri. As for
the reft that be ofa ncre kinde to thefcwe wil lighily r unne through
them by the way . They obied chat baprifine rs giuen vnto the for-
giuenes of (innesiwhich whe it is graunt€d,will largely make for dc-
fenfc of our fentcncc.For fith we be borne finners, we do euen from
our morhers wombenedc forgiuencjand pardon. Now feeingethc
Lord doth not cut of,but rather affure to that age the hope of raercy:
why (houlde we take from them the fi^ne which is much infcriour
than the thing it fclfe? Wherfore that which they go about to throw
againft vs^c thus throw backe againft chemfeluc$:infantes haue re-
miftion of finnes ijiuen them>thereforc they ought not to haue the
lpH«. J. fi^ne take from thcm.They allcagc alfo this out of the Epiftlc to the
»^» Ephe(ian5:that the Chtirch is clcanfcd of the Lord^with the waftiing
of water in the word of lifc.Than which there could nothinge be al-
lea -.ed more fit to ouerthrowe their errour : for thereupon groweth
an eafie profe of our fide. If the Lord wil haue the wafbing wh< rwith
he clcanfcth his Church , to be tcftific^ by baptifme : it feemerh not
* «^* rightful
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 5<^2
rightful that it (hould want the tcftimony of it in infantcs,which arc
ri^^hifully accepted part of the Church/ora(rruch ?s they be called
heircs of the heauenly kingdome. For Paulc fpeakcth of the whcie i.Cor.
Churchjwhcrehc faith that it wascleanfed with the bjptifme ofwa- ia.17.
ter . Likewife of thii that in an other place he fayth that we be by
baptifme gr.iftcdintoy body of Cliriil,we g.ithcrihut infants,whom
he reckencth amonge his members,ought to be b.ipti(cd,lcaft ihcy
be plucked away from his body Bcholde with what violence with lo
many engines they alTauJt the foitrelfes of our faith.
i^ Then they come downctothe prad;fc &culljrncof^timeof
y ApoftleSjWhcrin none IS found to haue bin admitted to baptifme,
but he which hath before profefled Faith & repentance. For where AdL.u
Peter w as asked of them that were minded to repct.whac was ncdc- J7.
ful to be done, he counfeUcd thcmtiift to repjnt, & ihcn lobe bap-
tifcdjintotheforgiuenesoftinncs. Likewile Phiitp.whethcEunuth ASt S.
required to be baptifed, anfwcrcd that he might be baptifed if he be- 37. *
Icucd with all his hart.Hcreby they thinkc mat they may winne,that
itisnotlawfull that baptifme be graunted to any, but where Faith &
repentance go before. Trudy if ac yethie ro this rer.fon , the fiift of
thelctwo places where is no mention m.ide of Faith, will prouc that
repentance alone fufficcthrand the other place, wherein repentance
is not required, will proue that Faith only is enough. 1 thinkc they wil .
aunfweLe that the one place is holpen with the other, and therefore
muli be icyncd together. 1 fay alfo l.kewifcjrhat other places mult be
laid together which make fomwhac to the vndoing of this kuocifor^
afmucii as there be many fcntcnces in Scripture , the vnderftaoding
whereof hangcth vpon the circun.ftancc of the place. As this prc-
fently is an example. For they to wiiom Peter and Philip fpake thcfc
thmgcs were of age fufhciv nt to haue pratftife of rcpcivati£C and to
conceiuc Faith. We carneftlv deny that fuch o-ijiht to be baptifed,
vntill after pel cciuing of their conuerCon and Faith, atlcaft fofarrc
as it may be fcarehed out by the iudgemec of men. But;,th3t infantes
ought to be accomptedin an other number, it 1$ more than cuidenc
enough. For in old time if any man did loyne himfelfe into commu- ^ I
nion of religion with 1 fi aeli,ir behoucd that he ihould Hrit be tanghi
the couenanc of the Loi d,& infti uCttd in ihc law,before that he were
marked with circumciflon , becaufc in birth he was a ftraungcr from
the people of Ifracll.w ich whom the coucoant had bin made which
circumcifion ftabliftied.
Z4 As alfo the Lord,when he adopteth Abraha to himfelfcdoth Gcn.ijj
not begin at circumcifion, ludinge in the meanc titnc what he tnca- '• |
BbBB i)
Cap. 1 6. Of the outward mcancs
n^rh by that figne.'butfirft he dcclarcth what coucnac he cntcdctlj
to make with him, & then after Faith giuen to the promifc, he ma^
Iff " '^ keih him partaker of the Sacramet. Why doth in Abraham the Sa*
crament follow Faith,& in Ifaac his fonnc it goeth before all vnder-
ttjnding ? Bcc3ufc it is mete that he, which being in full growcn age
is recciucd into felowlhip of the coucnant, froni which he had bin
hitherto a ftrangei ,nK>uld firit Icarnc the conditions thereofrbut an
infant begotten of him neded not fo, which by right of inheritance
accof dmg ro y forme of the promifc is cuen fro his mothers wombc
cotraned tn the coucnant. Or(f hat the matter be may more dearely
& briefly fnewed ) ifthe children of the faithfuI,without the help of
vndcf ftnndingc, are partakers of the coucnant,there is no caufe why
they Ihoulde be debarred from the figne for this that they can not
Gen.i 6 IWcare to the forme of the couenant. This verily is the reafon , why
2a.&a3 in fomc places God affirmcth that the infantes which areiflliedof
*^' the Ifrne!iics,are begotte & borne to him. For without dour he eftc-
meth ns his children the children of them to whofc (tcAc he pro*
mifethy he will be a Father.But he which is vnfaithfull,iffued of vn«
godly parcntSyttll he be by Faith vnitcd to God, is iudgcd a ftraunger
from rhe communion of the couenant.Therfore it is no maruel.ifhc
be not partaker of the figne, the Signification whereof fliould be dc*
Fphe.2. ceiifull ;ind voyde in him. To this eftcdtPaule alfo writeth , that the
ii. Gcntilrs fo long ns they were drowned in their idolatry ,were out of
the Tclhmcnt. With this {hort fummc, (as I thinke) the whole mat-
rer may be clearely opened;that they which in growen age,embrace
the Faythof Chnft, forafmuch as they v/cre hitherto ftraungctf
from the coucnant,3re not to be marked with bapiifme, but whcrc-
ns Faith and repentance come betwene,which onely can open them
the cntrie into felowlliippc of the couenant:but the infantes that arc
iffocd of Chriftiansjss they are rcceiucd of God into the inheritance
of the couenant fo foone as they be borne , fo ought to bcrcceiued
tob>ipti(me. Hereunto muft that be applied which the Euangelift
Matcj. fpeakcthof, thaithey were bapiifcd of lohn which confe fled their
i. fianes. Which exaplc at this day alfo we thinke mete to be kept. For
if a Turke offet himftlfc to bapiifme, hefhotddc not be rafliely bap-
tjfrd of vsjnamely not till after cotelTion whertby he may fatisfic the
Church.
Z5 Moreouer they bring forth the wordes of Chrift,which are re-
loh 3.5 hv;.:^rfed in the third Chiiprer of Iohn,whcrby they rhinke that a pre-
fcnt regeneration is required in baptifme. Vnleffe a man be borne a-
gainc of water and the Spirite, he can not enter into the kingdom o£
God«
To Saluation. Lib4. 5(^3
God. Lo(raythcy)howebaptirmc!$ byiheLordcsowncmouai
called regcncration.Tliem tlicrcfoi c v/honi ic is more ilun enough
knowen to be vnable to recciue rcgcncratio, by what colour do wc
admit 10 baptifmc which can not be without regcneratio? F:rll :hcy
arc dccciucd in this that <hcy thinkcthat intliis place nrrenaon is
made of baptifmcjbccaufe they hcatc the name of water. For after
thatChrift had declared toNicodcmui, the corruption of nature, 3c
caught him that me muft be borne of new,becaufc Nicodcmus drtM-
medof a boiily newc birth, he there (hesvcd the maner bowc God
doth regenerate vs , namely by water and the Spiritc : as though be
fhould fay,by the Spiritc which in clcanfinge and watcringc faicafull
foulcs,doth the office of water. Therefore I take water and the Spi-
ritc (imply for the Spirit,w.hich is water. Neither is this a new forme
of fpech,for ic altogether agrccth with thef^mc which is iathe third
Chapter of Mathcwe;Hc that folowcth me, it is he that baptifcth in. Matt. j.
the holy Ghoft and fier . Therefore as ro bapiirc in the holy Gi-.oft "•
and ficr,is to giuc the holy Ghoft , which hath the ofiicc and nature
of fier : fo to be borne againe of water and the Spi:ite,is nothing elle
but to rcceioc that power of the holy Spiritc which doch the Ci\r.^e
thinge in the foule that water doth in the body. I !.nowc thac other
dootherwifccxpounde it : but I am out of doutthat this ii thcna-
turall mcaninge : becaufc the purpofe oFChriil is none otherjbuc to
teach chat all they muft put of their ownc nature which aipirc to tho*
hcauenly kingdom. Howbcit if we hft to cauil vnfauonly as thf y do,
it were cafic for vs(whcn we hauc graunted as they wouldc haue it)
to inferre vpon them that baptifme is before Fayth and repentance*
forafmuch as in the wordes of Chrift it goeth before the Spirite. It
is certayne that this is vnderftanded of fpirituall giftcs : which it"
they come after baptifmc , I haue ohtayned what I require . But Ica-
uingc cauillations , we muft holdc faft the plaine cxpofition , which
I hauc brought , that no mannc till he hauc beene renewed v/iih H-
uingc water, that is, with the Spiritc, can enter into the kingdomc c£
God.
i6 Now hereby alfo it is euident that f heir fained inucntion is to
be hiiTedout, which adiudgc allthevnbapcifed toetcrnall death.
Therefore let vt accordingc to their rcqucft imagine bapnfme to be
miniftrcd to none but to them that be growen in age : what will they
fay,{hall become of a childc, which is f ightly and well inftrui^ed with
the introdudions of godlmeflc , if when the day of baptiGnge is at
hand, he happen to be taken away with fudden death bcGde all mens
hope ? The Lordes promife is cleare , that whofoeucr hath beleued i^ii^ p
BBBB iij $4. "*'
Cap.i 6, Of the outward mcanes
in the Sonnc,(hall not fee death,nor fliall come into iudgcmcnt, but
is already pafled from death into lifcrand it is no where foundc that
be cuer damned him that was not yet b Jptifed, Which I woulde not
haue fo .taken of me as though I meant c-iat baptifmc might freely
be defpifed(by which defpifingc I affirmethatthc Lordescoucnanc
is defiiedrfo much ItlTe can I abide to excufc it)only it is enough for
mc to proucthat it is not fo neccirary,that he (hould be immcdiatly
thought to be loft , from whome power ss taken away to obtainc it.
But if we aercc to their fained deuife, we (lull damne all them with-
out exccption.whom any chaunce withholdeih from baptifme^vvith
howc great Faith (oeucr (by whicii Chnft himielfc ispofleiTed) o-
thcrwife they arc endued . Moreouerthry maKeaJl infantes giltic
of cternall death, to whom they deny bspr ifmCi which by their owne
conftffionis necclTsry roinluation . Nowelctre them lookchowc
trimly trey agree with rhc wordcs of Chi ill , by which the kingdom •
tAtt.x^. of hcai>en i:-adiudgtdcothatage. But, ro graunt them cuerythingc
14. fo mL?ch as pertainet!i to the yndeift^ndinge of this place , yet they
fhall gathcrnothingc thereof , vnlefTe they oucrthrowe the former
dodrine which we haue ftablilhcd concerningc the regeneration of
infantes.
Z7 But they glory that they haue the (trongcft holde of all in the
very inftitution of baptifme,which they fetch out of the laft Chapter
Mat.28 of Matthew; where Chrift fending foorth h'.s Apoftlcs to all nations,
» j>« ciucth ch^'m the firlt commaundemenr to teache them , and the fe-
condeto baptifcthcm. Then alfo out of ihc laft of Marke they ad-
War.i 6. ioyne this, He that beleucth and is baptifed,{halbc faucd. What fekc
* *• we further (fay tht y)whcn the Lordes owne words do openly found,
that wcmuft Hrft teachcerewebaptifc, and do afligne to baptifme .
^ the fccond ftate after Faith ? Of which order the Lard alfo flicwed '
^^^ an example in him(elfe,which would be baptifcd not till the thirtith
luc. J. yeare. But here, O good God,how many waies do they both entan-
» j. glc themfelues,and bewray their owne ignorance ? For herein they
now more than childifhly crre,y they fetch the firft inftitutio of bap-
tifme from thenfe.which Chrift had from the beginning of his prea-
chingc giucn in charge to his Apoflles tominifter.Thcreforc there
is no caufc why they Qiouldc affirme that the lawe and role of bap-
tifmc is to be fetched out of thefc places, as though they contained
the firft inftitMtion thercof.But/vO bearc With them for this fault.yet
howftrone is thismancfofreafoning? Truely if I hfted to dally with
them,there is not a litlc lurking hole, but a moft wide fielde offereth
it fclfe open for vs to cfcapcthcm.For when they ftickcfofaft to the ^
order
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 5/^4
oixler ofwordcsjthat they gjthcr thatbccaufc it is faydjGcprcachc Mar.itf
an<lbaptirc,Againe,hcthatbcLwicthanciisbaptifcd, thcrcFoictljcy *5*
muft pr-eache before that they baptifc, & bclcuc before that they re-
quire bapiifmc : why may not wc againe anfwcrc them with fayingc
that wc mult baptife before that wc muft tcache the kcpmgof thofc
thmgcs that Chiift hath commaundcd : namely fith it is fayd , bap- •
ttfe ycjteachmg them to kepc whatfoeuer thinges I haue commiun-
dedyou? which fame things we haue noted iothatrayingcofChrift
which haue bin eucn now allcaged conccrningc the regeneration of
water and the Spirit. For if it be lb vndcrltodc as they would haue it,
verily in that place baptifmemuft be before fpirituall regeneration,
becaufe it is named in the firft place. For Chrift doth tcache that wc
mull be regenerate, not of the Spirit and water, but ot water and the
Spirit,
28 Now this inuincibte rcafon whereupon they bcarcxhcmfclucs
fo bolde, fecmcth to be fomwhat ihaken:but becaufe tructh hath dc-
fcnfe enough in Iimphcity , 1 will not efcapc away with fuch light ar-
gumentcs. Therefore let them take with them a full anfwerc. Chrift
in this place giueth the chiefc €ommaundcracnt conccrningc prca-»
ching of the GoipcU, whcreunto he adioyncth the miniftcry of bap-»
cifmc as an addition hanging vppon it. Againe he fpcaketh none o-
iherwife ofbaptifmc but fo farrc as the rainiftratioof iti$ vndcr the
office of teachingc. For Chrift fendeth the Apoftles to publidic the
Gofpel to all y nations of the world, 'that they fhould fro echwherc
with the do<firinc of faluation gather together into his kingdom men
that before were loft. But whom,or what manet ofmenPft is certainc
ihot there is no mention but of the that are able to receiue teaching.
Afterward he addcth that fuch,wh^n they are inftj;uded,ought to be
baptired,adioyningc a promifejthat they which beleue and arc bap*
lifed flulbc faued. Is there in all that faying (b much as one fillablc
of infantes ? What forme therefore of rcafbning {hall this be where*
with they aflailc v$ : they which arc of growcnagc » mufttirft bcin-
ftrudcdjthat they may bclcuc,cre they be baptifcdcthcrforc it is vn*
lawful to make baptifme common to infantes?Although they would
burft themfelues, they fliall proue nothing elfe by this place but that
the Gofpel muft be preached to the that arc of capacity able to hearc
it , before y they be baptifed , foiafmuch as he there fpcaketh of fuch
only.Let them hcreof,if they can, make a ftoppe to dcbarre infantes
from baptifmc.
29 But,chat eucn blindc men alfo may with groping Bnde out their
iJcccitps, I will point them out with a very clearc limilitude . If «ny
BBBB iiij
Cap,i(^. Of the outward mcancs
man cauill that infantes ought to hauc mcate taken from them, vpon
a TheC thjspretenfc that the Apoftlc fufFercth none to eate but them that
3 .10. labour , (hall he not be worthy that all men (houlcl fpii at him ? Why
for Becaufe he without difference draweth that to all mcn,which was j
fpoken of one kinde & one ccrtaine age of mc.No whithandfomer it
their handehng in this prefcnt caufe.For,that which euery man feeth
to bclongc to one age alone, they draw to infantcs,that this age alfo
may be fubied to y rule which was made for none but the that were
more growen in yeres. As for the example of Chrift, it nothmgc vp-
Iwc. }. holdeth their fide. He was not bapiifed before y he was thirty yeret
^* olde. That is in deede true : but there is a reafon thereof ready to be
ihe wed : becaufe he then purpofed by his preachingc to lay a founds
fundation of baptifme, or rather to ftablilh the fundation which had
bin before hydoflohn.Therforc when he minded with his doiftrinc
to inftitutei)aptifme , to procure the greater authority to his ini^itu-
tion, he Sandificd it with his owne body, and that in fuch firnelTe of
time as was moft conuenient, namely when he began his preaching.
Finally they fhall gather nothing elfe hereof, but that baptifme tokc
hisoriginalland beginninge at the preachingcof the Gofpcll.Ifthey
lift to appoint the thirtith yearc, why do they not keepe it, but do rc-
ceiuc cucry one to baptifme as he hath in their iudgcment fufficient-
ly profited.*? yea & Seruetius one of their maifters,when he ftiSely re-
quired this rime,yet began at the 11. yerc of his age to boaft himfelfc
to be a Prophetc. As though he were to be fuffcred that takcth vpon
himfelfc the place of a teacher in the Church,beforc that he be a m6-
bcr of the Church.
30 At the laft they obied,that there is no greater caufe why bap-
tifme fhould be giucn to infantcs,than the Lordes Supper,wbich yet
is not graunted them. As though the Saipture did not euery way cx-
prefle a large differencc.The fame was in dedc vfually done in the old
Church, as it appeareth by Cyprian and Auguftine;but t!iat maner is
worthily growen out ofvfe. For if we confiderthc nature and pro-
perty of baptifme,it is trucly an entry into the Church snd as it were
a forme of admiflion, whereby we are adnumbred into the people of
God , a figne of our fpirituall regeneration by which we are borne a-
gainc into the children of God : whereas on the other fide the Sup-
per is giuen to them that be more growen in age,which haumg pafied
tender mfancy,are now able to hcarc ftrong meate Which difference
is very euidently fliewed in the Scripture. For there the Lord lo much
as pertaineth to baptifme , maVeth no choifc of ages. But he doth
not likcwife giuc (he Supper to all to take part of it , but only to them
which
To Saluation. Lib.4. 5^5
which are (it co difccrne the body and blood of the Lord,to examine
their owneconfciencc, to declare thcLordcs death , to wcyc the
power thereof. Would we haue any thing plainer , than that which
die Apoftlc reacheth whe he cxhorteth that cuery man Oiould proue '•^or.
andcxaminchimfelfe, and then eaicof this bred and drmkc of this "•**•
cup? Therefore examination muft go before, which ihould in vainc
be loked for of infantes. Againe, he that eateth vn wor t hily , eateth
and drinketh damnatio to himfclfe,not difccrning the Lordcs body.
If none can partake worthily but they thnt can well difccrne the
hohnefTe of the Lordes body, why fhould wegcuc to our tender
children, poifon in fteede of liuely foode ? What is that commaun-
dement of the Lorde , ye (hall do it in remembrance of me ? what it
that other which the Apoftlc deriucth from the fame , So oft as ye
fhail eate of this bread^ye ihall declare the Lordes death till he come?
What remembrance (I bcfccheyou) fhall we require at our infantes
of the thing which they neiier atteined wiihvnderftanding? whac
preaching of the crolfc of Chrift,thc force and benefitc whereof
they do not yet comprehendein mindePNone of thefc things is
prefcribed in bapcifmc.Thcrefore betwenc thefc two fignes is great
difference : which wc note alfoin like fignes in. the oldc teftamenc,
Circumcifion , which is knowcn to aunfwere to our bapiifme , was
appointed for infants. iSuc the paffcouer into whoes place the Supper
hath nowe fucceded, did not receiue all maner of geftes without dif»
fcrence , but was rightly eaten of them onely that might by age en-
quire of the fignjfication of it. If thefc men bad remaining one
crumme of founJc braine , would they be blinde at a thing fo derc
and offring ir fclfc to fight?
^r Although itgrciiethme to lode the readers with a heape
of trifles : yet it fhalbc worth the trauaill brefcly to wipe away fuch
gay reafons as Seruettus not the le^ftof the Anabaptiftes,yeathe
great glory of that company .thought himfelfc to bring when be
prepared himfelfc to coHid.Hc allegcth,thac Chriftes fignes as they
be perfeAjfo do require them that be perfedorable toconceiue
perfedion. But the folution is eafy : that the perfedion of baptifme,
which extedcth euen to dcath,i$ wrongfully reftraine<l toone point
of time. 1 fay yet further, that perfcdton is foolifhly required in man
at the firft day , whercunto baptifmc allureth vs all our life long by
continual degrees. He obiedeth that Chriftes fignes were ordeined
for remembrance ,that cuery man ihould remember that he was
buried together with Chrift, I aunfwere that, that which he hath
fiuned of his ownc head . ncedcth no confutation : yea that which
Cap.i 6. Of the outwarde mcanps
hcdrawech tobaptifmCjPauIes word cs Hue wc to be proprc to the
holy Supper.rhat cucry man Ihould examine himfclfibuc ot baptifmc
there is no where any fuch thing.Whcreupon wc gather that they be
rightlv baprifcd which for their fmalneffc of age, arc not yet able
^ to rcceiue cxaminat»on. Whereas he thirdly allegcth , that all they
abide in death which beleucnot the Sonne of God) and that the
wrath of God abideth vpon them : and therefore that infants which
cannotbeleuc he in their damnation: f aunfwerc that Chrift there
ipeaketh not of the gcncrall gilcinclTc wherewith all the potteritic
of Adam are enwrapped , but onely ihrctncth the defpifers of the
GofpeU , which do proudely and (lubbornely refufe the grace ofTred
them. But this nothing pcrteincth to infantes. Alfo I fct a contraric
reafon againfl the:that whomfoeuer Chriii blelTeth, he is difcharged
from the curfc of Adam and the wrath of God : Sith therefore it is
knowen that infantes arc blcffed of him , it foUowcth that they are
difcharged from death. Then he falfly citcth that which is no where
red, that wbofocuer is borne of the Spirit, hcareth the voice of the
Spirit. Which although wc graunt to be written,yet (hall prouc no-
thing els but that the faithful! are framed to obedience, according as
the Spirit workcth in them. But that which is fpoken of a ccrtaine
number, ic is faultic to drawc indifferently to all. Fowcrthly he ob*
iedcth ; bccaufe that goth before which is naturall , we muft tarry
ripe lime for baptifmc which is fpirituall. But although I graunt that
all the poileritie of Adam begotten of the fleflie do from the very
wombc beare their ownc damnation , yet I denie that that withftan-
deth but that God may prefently bring remedy. For neither fhall
Scructrus prouc that there were many yeares appointed by God that
the fpirituall ncwncife of life many bcginne. As Paule tcflifieth , al-
though they which are borne of the faithfull arc by nature damned:
yet by fupcrnaturall grace they are faucd.Then he bringeth forth an
allegoric,thatDauid going vp into y tourc of SiQn,didleade neither
blinde men nor lame men with him but ftrong fouldiors. But what if
tuc 14. J ^^j g parable againfl it,whercin God calleth to the heauenly banket
blinde men and lame men: howc will Seruettus vnwindc himfclfc
out of this knott?I afke alfo whether lame and maimed men had
not firfl: bene fouldiors with Dauid. But it is fuperfluous to tary logcr
vpon this reafon , which the readers fhall findc by the holy hiftoric
to be made of mere falfchod. There followcth an other allegoric,
Mat.4. that the Apoftles wcrcti{hcrsofmcn,notof htlcchildren.But lafkc,
Juc 1 X, ^^^^ ^^^^ fayine of Chf ift mcaneth,that into the netie of the Gofpcl
47, * are gathered all kindcsof fi(hcs. But bccaufe I like not to pby with
allegoric?.
To Saluation. Lib,4. ^6&
silegorics,! aunfwerc ihac when the office ot teaching was cnicMned
lothcApoftlc5,yctthcy were not forbidden from baptifing of in-
fantes. Howbcit I would yet knowc , when the Euangeliiic nameth
them Anthropous men, (in which word is cornprchendcd all man-
Linde wuhout exception) why they fhould deny infantes to be men. p
Scucnthly he allegcth,that fith fpirituall things agree with fpirituall, j j, *
infantes which ar^' not fpirituall, arc alfo not mete for bapcifme. But
firft it is plainly cuidcnt howc wrongfully they wreft the place of
Paulc. There is entreated of dod^oe : when the Corinthians did to
muchftai^e in their ownc conccite forvainc fharpnefle of wittc,
Paulc rcbuketh their flu^illineirc , for that they were yet to be io-
ftrudcd in the hrft introductions ofheaucnly wifdome. Who can
thereof gather that baprifmc is to be denied to infant?.,whom being
bcgottsni of the flelh God doth by free adoption make holy to him-
felfc? Whereas he faith.that they mnrt be fed wirh fpirituall mcate,
if they be newe men , the folution is ^3i(y , that by baptifme they arc
admitted into the flodcc of Chnft,and that thefignc of adoption
fuffifcth them, till being grovven to age they be abje to bearc ftrong
meatc : that therefore the time of eTaminntion which God cxprtfly
requireth m the holy Supper, muft be taned for. Afterward hcob-
iedcth that Chriftcallcth all his to the holy Supper. But it isceitaine
enough that he admittcth none , but them tlut be already prepared
to celebrate the remembrance of his death. Whereupon follovvcth
that infaater, whom he vouchefaued to embrace, do (bv in a feuerall
and proper degree by themfclucs till they growe to age , and yet arc
not ftrangcrs. Whereas he fayeth.that it is monitt ous that a man after
that he is borne^Oiould not eate-.I aunfwerc chat foulcs areotherwifc
fed than by the outward eating of the Supper: and that therefore
Chrift IS neuerthelefTc mcate to mfantcs , although they abfteinc
from thcfigne.Buc of baptifme the cafe is otherwifc,by which onely
the gate into the ChurcK is opened to them. Againe he obiedleth
that a good Stewarde dillributcth meatc to the houfeholdcin due Nfac.i4,
time. Which although I wilhngly graunt: yet by what right will he 4^.
appoint vnto vs the certainc time of Baptifme, that he may proue
that it is not geucn to infantes out of time . Moreouer he bringeth
m that commaundemcnt: of Chrift to the Apoftles,that they (hould lohn 4,
make haA into the harut ft, while the ficldes waxe white. Verily Chrift j 5»
mcaneth this onely, that the Apoftlcs feying the fruit of their labor
prefcnt , fliould the more chcrcfully prepare themfelucs to teach c.
W(:o fhali thereof gather that the onely time of harueft is the ripe
time for baptifme ^ His elcucnth rcafon is , that in the firft Church ^^
»4.
.'^^
Cap. 1 6. Of the outwardc mcancs
Chntbans and difciplcs were ali one : buc we fee nowr chat he fon j«
]y reafonech from the parte to the whole . Difciples are called men
of full age, which had bene already throughly caught, and had pro- I
feifcd Chrift : as vc beimued ihac chc Icwcs vnder the iawc fliould
be the difciples of Mofcs : yet no man (hall thereof rightly gather, i
that infantes were ftrangers, whon the Lordc hath tcftificd to be of
his houfeholde. Befide thefe he allegeth.that all Chriftians are bre-
thren , in which number infantes arc not vnto vs , To long as wc de-»
barre them from the Supper. But I reiurneto that principle, thac
none arc heires of the kingdome of heauen * buc chey that are the.
incmbrcs of Chrift : then , that the embracing of ChriH; was a true ^
token of the adoption,whereby infantes arc iomcd in common with
full growcn men, and chat the abfteining for a time from the Supper
ivithfiandeth not buc that they perteine to the body of the Church*
Neither did the thefe that was conuerted on the Croflc , ceflfe to be
brother of the godly , although he neucr came to the Supper, Af-
terward he addeth , that none is made our brother buc by the Spirit
of adoption,which t& geuen onely by the hearing of faith.I aunfwere,
that he ftiU fallech backe into the fame dcceitefull argument,bcc3ufe
he ouerthwarcly drawcth y to infants which was fpoke only of growa
inen.Paule tcachecli there chat chis is Gods ordinarie maner of cal-
ling to bring his eled co the faith,whe he ftirreth vp to them faithfull
teachers, by whoes minifterie and trauaile he reacheth his hande co
" them. Who dare thereby appoint a Iawc to him , but that he may by
fome ochcr fccrctway graffc infantes into Chrift? Where he ob«
Aft.ie. ic^c^b that Cornelius wasbaptifed after chac he had recciued the
J4. HolyGhoft:howc wrongfully he doth out of one example gather a
Ad. t. generall rulc,appcieth by the Eunuch and the Samaritanes,in whom
*7» the Lorde kepte a cotrary order,rhat baptifme went before the gifts
of the Holy Ghoft.The fiftenth reafon is more than foolifh.Hc faith
that wc arc by regeneration made gods: and that they be gods to
whom the word of God is fpokcn, which accordeth not to children
that be infantes. Whereas he faincth a Godhead to the faithfuUjthac
is one of his dotages , which ic pertcincth not co this prefenc place
to cxaminc.Buc to wreft the place of the Pfaimc to fo c6trarie a fenfe,
isapoint of defperatcfhamelefneflc. Chrift faith , chac Kings and
Magiftratcs are called of the Prophet goddcs, bccaufe they bearc an
O01CC appointed them of God. Bur, thnt which concerning the fpc-
ciall commaundement of gouei nance is direftcd to certainc men,
tbishand(bme cxpo(itor drawcth to the do(ftfinc of the Gofpell,
that be may baniih infantes out of the Ci>urch.Againe he obie^eih,
(hai
tohn. I.
55.
'^i^/'-
To Saluarion. Lib.4. 5^7
that tnfbntes can not be accomptcd newe men, becauie they arc not
begotten by the word. But I donowc againc rcpctc that which I
haue often hid , that to regenerate vs dottrine is the vncorruptible
fecde , if we be fit to rcceiue it : but when by reafon of age there is
not yet in vs aptneflc to learne, God kepeth his degrees of regene-
rating. Afterward he commcth backc to his allegories , that in the
lawc a lliepe and a goate were notoftVcd in facrifice fo (one as they
came out of the wombe.lf I hftcd to dra we figures to this purpofe, I
could hkcwife redily obicd againft him,that all hrft begotten things
were confecrate to God fo lone as they had opened the wombe:
thcn,tbatalambemuftbcki]led atayearesage.VVherupofolloweth Bx».iib,
that manly ftrength is not to be taned for , but rather that the newe a.
and yet tender iflues are chofen of God for facriHces. Furthermore Exo««i»
he affirmeth that none can come to Chrift , but they that haue bene 5'
prepared of lohn. As though lohns office were not enduring but for
a tJmc.Butjto omitt this, trucly that fame preparation was not in the
children whom Chrift embraced and bled'ed. Wherefore lethioi
go with his fa Ifc principle. At length he callcthfor patron cs Trif-
megiitus and the Sibyllcs, to proue that holy waftiings perteine not
but to them that a''e of growen agc.Lo howc honorably he thinketh
of the baptifme of Chrift, which he rcduceth to the Ceremonies of
the Gentiles , that it may be no ochcrwife miniftred ti^an pleafeth
Trifmegiftus. But we more eftecmc the authoritie of God , whocn
it hath pleafed to make infantes holy to himfelfjand to admitte them
with the holy (igncjihe force whereof they did not yet by age vn-
derftad. Neither do wecompt itlawfuUtoboroweoutofchcclean-
fings of the Gentiles any thing that may change in our baptifme the
cuerbftingand inuiubblclaweof God, which he hath ftablifhcd
xoncermng circumcilion.Laft of all,he makcih this argument : that if
it be lawful ro baptife infantes without vnderftanding,then baptifme
may enterludelike and in fport be miniftrcd of boyci when they play.
But of this matter let him c^uarell with God by whoes commaunde-
nient circumcifion was common to infantes before that they had
«tteincd vndcrftanding Was it therefore a playing matter, or fubieA
to the follies of children , that they might ouerthrow the holy ordi-
nance of God ? But if is no meruaile that thefe reprobate Spirits , as
ihouch they were vexed with a phrcneGe, do thruft in all the groflcft
abfurdities for defence of their errors : becaufe God doth with fuch
giddintflc iuftly take vengeance of their pride and ftubborneflc. Verily
I truft I haue made plamc with howc febie fuccocs Scructtus hatli
holpen hit (illy brethren the AnabaptiiU.
Cap.i 7. Of the outwardc mcancs
jz Nowc T rhinke i: will be doutfull to no lobrc nun,hQwe rafJily
they trouble the Church of Chrift , chat moue brawlcs anfd conten-
tions for the baptifmc of infantes. But it is proiitabie to coiidcr, what
Satan goeth about with this fo great futtclty.tiien to take away fiom
v$ the (ingular fruit of affiance and fpintuali ioy wliich is to be ga-
thered heicof,& to dimn.ilkas much alfo of the glory of ihe good-
nefTe of God. For howc fwetc iS it to godly mindes , to be cei tificd
not oncly by word, but alio by fis^ht to be leenc with eyes , that they
obieine fo much fauor wirh the heauenly father , that he hath aifo
care of their podcritie ? For here it is to be fccne , howe he takcrh
rpon him the perfon of a moft prouident Father of houfeholdc
toward vs I which eucn after our death doth not lay away hk careful-
neffc of vs , but prouideth and forfceth for our children. Ought wc
?fa, 4}. not here after the example of Dauid with a! our hart to Icape vp vnto
■*• thankefgeuino, that by fuchfhcweof hisgoodntffe, his name may
be fanftified? This, verily Satan mccndcth, in afTailing with fo great
armies the baprifmc of mfantcs : namely, thas this tetiifying of the
grace of God being taken away , the promifc which by it is prefent
before our eycs,may atlcng^th by httleand iuile vanilh away.Whcr-
vpon fhould growe notonelya wicked vnihankfaiucffe toWcird the
niercy of God, bwalfo accitainc flouthfu!n,;(re inmftiu^mi^ our
children to godlintffe. For by this fpurre we are not a htde pricked
forward to bring them vp in the carneft fearc of God & in the kcping
of his Iawe,whcn wc colider that cuen immcdiatly from their birth,
he taketh and acknowlcd^eth them for his child, en. Wherefore va-
jcfle wc hftenuioufly to darken the boumifulneffe of God,let»s
offer to him our children , to whom he gciieth a place among them
that be of hisfamilie and houfeholde^hat is to fay , the members of
the Church.
The xvij. Chapter.
Ofthi hofy Supper ef (, hrifl :and what it aHaiteth vs,
AFtcr that God hath ones recciued vs into his familic,and not
oncly to take vs as his fcruantcs,but as his children : thit he
may fulfill the office of a moft good Father , and carefujl for
his iflue , he taketh alfo vpon him to nouriili v s throughout
the whole cou fcof our hfe, And not cotented therewith, it pleafcd
him by a pledge geuen, to affure vs of this continuiill libcialitic. To
this cnde therefore hehalhgcucnhts Church another Sacrament
I»h.tf. by the hand of his only begotten Sonne , namely a fpiritaill banket,
5** wherein Chnft teftifieth himfelfe to be the cjuickning b, ead,whcr|^-
with
To Saluation. Lib.4. 5^
with our foulcs are fed to true 9c blefled immorialitieButforafniuch
its the knowledge of fo great a milierie is very nccc(faric , and accor*
ding CO the greacnclTc thereof, rcquireth a diligent declaration : and
Sacan^that he might bereuc the Church of this incCiimablc trcafurc,
hath long ago fprcd mii^cs , and (ins chat time darkneffc , to obfcurc
the light of ic,and then hath ftirred (Iriues and battels that mighc
eftrange the mindes of the iimple from tafting of this holy fode.and
hath aJfo in our time attempted the fame craft: therefore when!
fhall hauc brefely knit vpthe fummc for the capacmc ofthevn-
learned,! will vndo thofc knottcs,whcrewith Satan hath cndcuorcd
to fnare the world. Firft, bread and wine are figncs, which reprefcnc
vnto vs the inuiiible foode , which we receiuc of chc Bcdi and blood
of Chfift. For as in baptifme God againc begettmg vs doth graffe v$
into the fellowfhippe of his Church, and by adopcion duch make vs
his owne : fo we haue faid that he performeth the office of a proui-
dent Father of houfcholde, in this that he concinually miniftrech rs
meate,chac he fufleineth and prefcructh vs in that life whereinto he
hath by his word begotten vs.Nowc the oncly meate of our foule is
Chnit,and therforc the hcaucnly Father callcth vs to him,that being
refrelhed with common partaking of him, we may from time to time
gather liuely force , vntiU weattcinc tohrauenly immonahtie. Bur
forafmuchas thisraiftcrieof the fecret vninngof Chrift with the
godly is by nature impoflible co be comprehended , he ^eucth chc
figure and image thereof in vifible figncs moft fit for our 1 mall capa-
ci(ie:ycaas it were by earneftesandtokensgeucn,hemakcthic (o
aOured vnto vs as if it were fene with our eies , bccaufe this fo fami-
liar a limilitude encrech euen into the grofl'eft mindes, that foules arc
fo fed with Chrift^as bread and wine do fufteine chc bodily life.Nowe
therefore we haue it declared , to what endc this mifticall blcilin^
tendeth,namcly to aflure vs,that the body of the Lorde was fo ones
ofTrcd for vs , that we nowe eate it , and in eating it do fele in vs the
cfFc^uall working of that oncly facrifice : that his blood was lb ones
flied for vs , chat it is vnco vs continuall drinke. And fo founde chc
words of the promife there adioiiied. Take,this is my body, which is Mac»C
deliuercd for you. The body therefore which was ones offred vp for ^ •*
our raluacion,we arc commaunded co take and cate:that when we fee ^''^^
our fclues to be made partakers of this , wc may certainly determine tuc.iu
that the power of his death which bringcth life {hajbe cf}e<5)[uaUin vs. iy.
Whereupon alfo he callcth the cuppe,thc coucnatin his blood.For * Cor,
after a ccrtainc maner it rencwcth,or rather continucth the coucnat * '-^^^
which he hach ones ilablifhed with his blood, fo much as pcrcaiactK
l^ap.17. Ur the outward meancs
to the confirmiflg of our faith , lb oftc as he reacheth vnto rs that
holy blood to be taftcd of.
1 A great fruit verily of affiacc and fwctcncflc may godly foulet
gather of this Sacrament, bccaufe they bauc a witnefiej that we arc
growcn together mto one body with Chrift, fo that vvhatfocuer is his
we may call ours. Hereupon followeth that we may boldly promifc
vnto our fclueSjthat eueriaftinglifc is ours, whereof he is heire : and
that the kingdomc of hcauen, whereinio he is no we entred > can no
more fall away from vs than from him : agajne that we can not nmvc
be condemned by our hnnes , from the giltinelle whereof he hath
acquitcd vsjwhen he willed them to be imputed to himfelf as if they
were his ownc. This is the maruailous exchange , which of his im»
meafurablc bomifulneflc he hath made with vs ; that he being made
with vs the fbnnc of man,hath made vs with him the fonnes of God:
that by his comming downc into earth. he hath made vs a v/ay to go
vp into hcauen: that putting vpon him our mortalitie,he hath gcuen
vs his immortalincrthat taking on him our weakenefle,he hath
fircngthcncd vs with his power : that taking our pouerty to himfelfe
he hath conueyed his riches to vs : that taking to him the weight of
our vnrighteoufnes, wherewith wc were opprclTedjhc hath clothed
vs with his rightcoufnefle.
J Of all thefe things we hauc (b full a witneffing in this faera-
mcnt , that wc muft certainly determine , that Chritt is truely geuen
vsjas if Chrift himfelf were fet prefent bctorc our eyes, and handled
with our handes. For this word can neither lie to vs, nor mockc /sj
T3kc,eate,drinke : this is my body which is dcliuered for you-.this is
the blood, which is flied into the forgeiiencfle of finnes. Whereas
he commaundcih to take , he fignificth that it is ours. Whereas he
commaundeth to eate , he fignifietb that that is made one fubftancc
with vs. Whereas he faith of the body, that it is deliucred for vs : of
the blood, that it isfhed for vs : therein he teacheth that both arc
not fo much his as ours : becaufe he toke and laide away both , not
for his commoditie , but to our faluation. And truely it is to be dili-
gently marked , that the chicfc and in a maner whole pith of the fa-
cramcnt ftandeth in thefe vvords,Which is dehuered for you,Which
is flicd for youFor ,otherwife it iViould nor much profit vs , that the
body and blood of the Lordc are nowc diftributed,vnlefre they had
bene ones geuen forth for our redemption and faluation. Therefore
they arc reprefcnted vnder bread and wine , that we Ihould learnc
that they are not onely ours , but alfo ordeined for the nountliment
of rpirituail life. This is it chat wc before (ay cd , that from the cor-
pora 11
1 o oaiuauon. x.iu*^, 5 ^y
jjorall things which arc Ihcwcd forth in ihc Sacrament, we arc by a
certainc proportionall relation guided to fpiiituall things. So when
bread is gcuen vs for a fignc of the body of Chnft.wc ought by and
by to concciue this fimiliiudc : As bread nouriihcth, fuftcincth, and
mainteincth the life of our body : fo the body of Chrift is the onely
jneatc to quicken and ?cuc lifie to our foule. When wc fee wine ice
forth for a fignc of his blood : we muft call to mimic what vfcs wine
bringcth to the body , that wc may conCdcr that the fame arc
brought to vs fpiritually by the blood of Chnft : thofe vfcs be , to
i:hcr.(h,to rcfrcfli,to ftrcngthcn.to make mcry. For if wc fufticicntly
wcye, what the deliucring of this holy body , what thefhcding of
this holy blood,hath profited vs:we ihall pUir^y perceiue that thefe
thing* which arc fpoken of bread and wine , according to fuch pro-
poi tionall relation do very well accordc with them toward v$ when
they are communicated vmo ts.
4 Therefore the chicfc partes of the Sacrament arc not, (imply
and without hicr confidcration to reach to vs the body of Chrift;but
rather that fame promife,whereby hetcftiheth,that hjifleflic i$ vcrir
ly mcatc,and his blood is drmke,with which we are fed intotternall
life : whereby he affirmeth himfelfe to be the brcade of lifc,of whidi
who fo catcthjhc ihalHiuc for cuer.to feale (I fay) and confirme that
piromifc'.and for bringing the fame to paffc, to lende vs to the crolTc
of Chnit, where that promilc hath bene irut ly performed, and in ali
pointes fulHlled. For we do not well and healthfully catc Chritt but
icriieilicd,whenwcdowithhucly fctling concciue the cftcdualncflc
of his death.For whereas he called himfclfc the brcade of life, he did
not borrowc chat name of the facramcnt, as fomcdo wrongfully ex*
poundc It : but becaufc he was gcuen vs fuch of the Father ,and per*
formed himfelfe fuch , when being made partaker of our humane
inoitaUtic , he made vs parceners of his diuine immonahtie : when
cjffring himfelfe for facnficc,he toke our accurfedncfTc vpon himfclf,
chat he might fill vs with bitflfing : when with his death he deuourcd
and fwalowcd vp death : when in his rcfurrcdion he raifed vp this ouf
corruptible flcfh which he had put on,to glory and vncorruption.
'5 It remameth that by appliance all the fame may come to vi«
That is done , both by the Gofpc II , and more cleercly by the holy
Suppcr.whcrc both he offreth himfelf to vs with ali hii good t hings,
and wc rccciuc him by faith. Wherefore the facramcnt makcth noc
that Chrift fii ft bcginncth to be the bread of life '. but when it bi in-
gcih into remembrance , that he was made the bread ot hfe , which
WC conttnually cace,and when it gcucth roto vs the caft and fauor «f
cccc
that hrrcadc then it makcili vs to fcic the ftrcngth of that brea<I. For
it pf omifeth vs , that whatfoeuer Chritt did or lutfrcd , the fame wa«
done to gcuc life to fs. Then, that this gcuing of hfc is euerlalhng,
by which wc may without cnde be nourifhed,fufteined,& preferue4
in life. ForasChriftlhouldnoc bauc bene to vs the bread of hfc,
vnleflTc he had bene borne and had dicdfor vs , vnleflc he had riftn
againe for vs.'fo now he (Ijould not be the fame vnlefle the effedaai-
ncfle and fruit of his birth,dcath and rerurredi6,wcrc an euerlafting
and immortall thing. All which Chrift hath very well cxpreffcdio
lobn. tf. thcfc wordes : The bread which I will geue , is my fleHi, which I will
^** gcuc for the life of the world.By which words without dout he ligni-
£cth,tli^t his body (hould thcrfore be to vs for brcad,to the fpiritudU
life of tWc foulc jbecaufc it iliouJd be gcucn forth to death for our
faiuation : and that it is deliuered to vs to cate of it , when by faitb
he maketh vs partakers of Jt.Ones thcrfore he gaue ic,that he miqht
be made bread , when he gaue forth himfclfe to be crucified for the
redemption of the world : daily hegeueth it, when by the word of
the Gorpcll he offrcth it vnca vs to be rccciucd,fo farre as it was cru-
cified ; where he fealetb that deliucrace with the holy mifteric of the
Shipper : where he inwardly fulHllcch that which he outwardly be-
rokencth.No^c herein we mult beware of two faulces, that neither
doing to much in abacJng the figncs, wc fccmc to plucke them from
their mifterics to which they are in a mancr knitcc faft.nor that being
immcafurable in aduancing the fame , wc fecme in the meane time
fomwhatio darkethc mifterics themfclues.That Chrift i$ the bread
«f life,whercwith the faithfull arc nourifticd into eternall faiuation,
there IS no man but he grauntech , vnleiTc he be altogether without
religion- But this point is not likcwifc agreed vpon among all men,
what is the mancr of partaking of him.For there be that in one word
dcfine,that to cate the flelli of Chrift, and to drinke his blood, is no-
thing els but to beleuc in Chrift himfelfc. But I thinke that Chrift
meant fomecertainer and hier thing, in that notable fermon where
he commcndcrh to vs the eating of his flcfttc : namely , that wc arc
quickned by the true partaking of him : which alfo he therefore ex*
prcflfed by the wordes of eating and drmkixjg , leaft any man lliould
thinke , that the life which wc receiue of him is concciued by bare
knowlcdjic only.Foras not the 6ght,butthe eating of bread fuffifeth
the body for nouriftimet : fo it bchoueth chat the foulc be truely and
throughly made par taiker of Chrift, that by the power of him it may
be quickened into a fpirituall life.Bur in the mcanc time we confeflc
that there is no other eating , but of faich : as there can no other be
imagined.
lo Daiuauon. i^io.^. yy^j
i-magmedi But this is the difference bctweciic my wordcs and then s,
that whidVthcm locate is onely to beleuc : but I fay ilutthcflenic
ef Chrift is eaten with bcleuirtg , beeautc by faith bt is made ours,
and I fay that eating is thcfiuitc and tffcd of fan;S;Or,ft you will
hauc it plainer, with thtm eating is faith ;and I thinkc it railurio
followe of faith. In wordcs verily the difference is butfmallc »butin
the thing itfclfe,noc fmall. For though the ApoHlc tcachcththat Ephcj.
Chnrt dwcUcth in ourhartcsby Faith: yet no man will expoundc i7«
this dwelling to be faith : but all movdo percciuc that there is cx-
prcffed a lingular effcd of fauh, for that by it the faithfull do obieinc
CO haue Chrift dwelling in them. Afcer this mancr,the'Lorde meant, io!in.6.
in calling himfelfc the bread of life, uotontlyto teachc that in the S»»
faith of his death and refurredion , faluation is rcpofed for vs : but
alio: thatby true partaking of hitufcUe it ^^ brought to-paffe,that his
hfc pafleth into vs , and becomcth ourcs : like as bread , when u if
taken for foode,mini{lrcth huelineffe to the body.
6 Neither did Auguftinc» whom they bnng in for their patron,
in any other meaning write that we eate by bcleuing , than to fhewc
that this eating is of faith,not of the mouth. Which lalfo denie not:
but yet thcrewithall I addc , that we do by faith enibrace Chrift , not
appearing afarre of, but making himfclfe one with vs , that he may
be out head, and we his mcmbrts. Yet do not I vrteily difalowe that
maner of fpeaking: but oncly 1 deny it to be a full declaration , if
they mcanc to define what it is to eate the flellie of Chrift. Other-
wife I fee that Auguftinc hath oftevfcdthis forme of fpechie;a$
when he faith in the thirde boke Of Chriftian doftrine , Vulcffe ye
catc the flelKe of the fonne of man : this is a figure teaching t^at wc
mud: communicate with che paflion of theLorde,andnioftfweete'
\y and profitably lay vp in remembrance that for vs hisflefhewas
crucified and wounded. Againe when he fayeth,ihac the three HomeJ.
thoufandc menne which were conucrted at Peters fcrmon , did '" ^"['
diinke the bloode of Chrift by belcuing , which they had ftiedde ^q.
by a uell dealing But m many other places he honorably fettechout Aat.a.
that benefit of faith, that by it our fouies arc no Icffc rcfrefhcd with 4»»
the communicating of the flcflie of Chrift, than our bodies arc
with the breadc which they eate , And the fame is it which in a ccr-
lainc place Chrifoftome writcth, that Chrift doth not oncly by Homei.
faithjbutahoindeedcmakcvs his body. For he meaneth not that *«•
we do from any other where than from ^ith,obteine fucb a benefice:
but this onelyhc meanethto exclude, that none when he hcaretlv
faith to be nan\cdyibouldecoQceiue a naked imagination. At iec
CCCC i)
Cap. 1 7. Of the ou wardc mcancs
tiicni that wil hauc the Supper to be oncly a marke of outward pro^
fv flion,l do nowe paflc themoucr : bccaufc I thinkc thatlhaue fuf-
fieit-ntly confuted their error , when> emreated of Sacraments ge-
uc.aa nerally. Of;clythis thing Jet the reders marke , that when the cup is
0. caHed the couenam in the blood , there is a promife exprcflcd that
may be of force to confirmc fajth. Wherupon foIlowc(h,rhat vnlefie
we haue refptd to God , and embrace that which heoffreth^ we do
not rightly vfc rhe holy Supper,
7 Morcoucr they alfo do not fatis^ me, which acknowledging
that we haue fome communson with Chrift, when they mcane to
exprcHeiCjdo make v$ partakers cnely oftheSpirit,wirl5out making
any mention of Bclhe and blood. As though all thofe things were
Jpokcnof nothmg,ih:»t his flelh is verily mcate,that his blood is veri-
ly dnnke : that none hath life , but he that cateth that fielhe , and
driiiketh that Woodrand fuch other iayings that belong to the fame
ende Wherfore if it be certaine that the full comunicatingof Chrift
pi ocedtth beyondc ihcir dtfcription , as it is to narowly (drained : I
Yii^l nowe go about to knit vp in fewc wordes , howe large it is and
hr^we taric it extendcih it felfe , before that I fpeake of the contrarie
fai.lr of cxceflTc. For I (hall hauc a longer difputaiion with thccx-
celTiue tcachcis,which»wben according to their owne groflhefic they
frnmc amantr of eating and drinking fuU of abfurditie, do alio lran^.
figureChrift ftripped out of hisfleftie into a fantafietifyetaman
XTK'j with any wordes comprehcndc fo great a miderie , which I fc
tliat 1 can not fufficiently eomprehende with minde : and therefore
1 do, williti-ly confciTc it , that no man fhoulde mcafure the hinefle
thereof by the foiall proportion of my childiihnefTe^Bat rather I ex-
bortc the reders, that they do not reftraine the fenfe of their minde
wuhin thefe to narrowe boundcs : but endeuor to rife vp much hier,
than they can by my guiding. For I my felfe, fo oft as I fpeake of
this tiimg,whcnl Haue trauarledto fay all , thinke that Ihaueyee
laid but lide m refpewtofthe Worthincfic thereof. And although
the jTijnde can do more m thtnking,thdn the tong in expreffing ; yet
with greatntflc of the thin^ , the mind alfo is furmoonted and ouer-
whelmed. Finally therefore nothing remaineth, but that 1 muft
hreake fourth into admiratioh of that mifterie, which neither the
mindccan luffife to thinke of, nor the tong to declare Yet after
fuch mam r as 1 can, I will fct fourth the fummeof my fentece: which
asl noihingdouttobetrue^foltruftthat it willnotbediraliowcd
of godly hartes.
8 JFuA of all t wc arc caught out of the Saiptcre, that Chn A was
froa
To Saluation. Lib.4, 571
flrorti the beginning that life bringing word of the Father, the foua-
lainc and originall of life,froin whcnfe all things euer rccciucd chcir
hauingof hfc. Wherefore lohn fomctimccalleth him the wo»d of
iifc, and fomtime wriieth that hfc Was in him : meaning that he cutn
tiicn flowing into all crc»turcs,^ourcd into them the power ot brea-
thing and huing. Ycithefame [ohnaddeth afterward, that the hfc
wai then and not till then openly llicwed, when the Sonne of God,
taking vpon him our flelhe , gauc hinifclfc to be fenc with eyes and
fehc wirii handes. For though he did before alfofpred abrodehis
power inro the creatures ; yet becaufc man,being by finne eftrangei
from <7od,h.iuing loft the comunion of hfe/awe on cuery (Jde death
hanging oucr him : that he mii'ht re.couer hope of immortalitie , it
behouedihat hcfbould be receiucd into the commun-on of that
woid. For howc fmall a confidence niaye^t t'lou conceiue thereof, if
thou heare that the word of God in decde/r om which chou art mofl
farre rcmot»cd , concemeth in it fclfe the fulr.eil'e of life , but m thy
felte and rounde about th«c nothing ofTrcth it felfeand ispiefent
before thine eyes but death? But fins that fbunraine of hfc brgannc
todwellioourfleflie,noweitliethnot afarrecf hiddenfrom vSjbut
prefently dehuereth it felfeto be partaken of vs. Yea and it makeih
the very fleihe , wherein it rcftcth, to be o( power to bring hte to v$,
that by parrakins thereof we may be fed to immortalitie. I am (faith
he) the bred of hfe,thatam come downe from hcaoen.And ihc bred ^g j^
which I will geue , is my flc{he , which I will gcue for the life of the g[
world. In which wordes he teacheth , not onely that he is iife , in re-
fpe^that he i$ riie eiernall word of God which came downe to vf
from heauenjbut that in comming downe he poured the fame power
into the flefhe which he did put on , that from thcnfc the commu-
nicating of life might flowe fourth vnto vs. Hereupon alfo thefts
things nowe foilowe , that his flefhe is verily meatc, and his blood is
verily drinke, with which fuftcnances the faithfull are foftered into
cternall hfc. Herein therefore confifteth (ingular comfort to the
godly, that nowe they finde life in their owne fleflic. For fo they do
not onely with caly paflage atteine vnto it,but haue it of it felfe laid
abrode for them and off ing it felfe vnto them.Ontly let them holdc
open the bofome of their hart,that they may embrace it being prc^
fentjand they (hall obtcinc it.
9 But although the ftcfhe of Chrift hauc not fo grestpowerof
it felfe , that it can gcue life to v$,which both in the owne firtt eftatc
of it was fubieftc to mortahtie,and nowe being endued with immor-
oUtic, liuethnot by it fclfc :yet it is rightfully called hftbringing^
CCCC Uj
Cap. 1 7. Of the outward meanes
which is BUcd with fulnefTe of life, to poure ic into f%. In which mea->
»hn. 5. ning I do with Cirill expoundc that faying of Chrift : as the Father
^ hath Ufc in hirafclfe,fo he hath alfo geuen to the Sonne to haue life
in himfelfe. For there he properly fpeaketh of his giftcs , not which
he from the beginning poireflcd with the Father, but with which he
wasgarniHied in the fame flclhc in which he appeared. Therefore
he ihcwcth that in his roanhode alfo dwelleth the fulnefle of life,
that whofocuer partakeih of his flertie and blood i may therewichall
alfo enioy the partaking of hfe. Of what fort that is wc may declare
by a familiar example. For as out of a fountaine water is fometime
dronke,fometime is drawep , fometime by forrowes is conucyed to
the watering of groundes, which yet of ic felfe doth notoucrflowe
into fo many vfes , bot from the very fpring it felfe which with euer-
laiting flowing yeldeth andminiftrcth vnio it from time to rime new
aboundancerfo the flclhc of Chrift is like a riche and vnwafledfoun-
tatnc which poureth mto vs the life Springing from the Godhead
into ic felfe. Nowe who fccth not, that the communion of the fle(hc
and blood of Chrift isncceflarie toallthac afpircto heaucnly hfe?
Hereunto tcndcth that faying of the Apoftle , that the Church is the
body of Chriftandthefulfillingof ii:andthatheif thehead out of
which the whole body coupled and knit together by iointcSj makeih
encreafcof the bcnly: that our bodies are the members of Chrift,
All which things we vndcrftande to be impoflibie to be brought to
paflc , but that he muft wholly clcaue to vs in Spirit and body. But
that moft ncre fcllowllijp whereby we arc couj.'led with hisfleflic,
he hath yet fee out with a more glorious title , when he faid that we
*• arc members of his body , and are of his bones and of his flefhc.
At the laft , to declare it to be a matter s^reater than all wordes , he
concludeth his faying with an exclamatiori. This is (faith he) a great
fecret. Therefore it ftiould be apointe of extreme madnefle , to ac-
knowledge no communion of the faithfull with the fleOie and blood
of the Lord, which the Apoftle dcclarcth to be fo great , that he had
rather wonder at it than ejcpreflc it.
10 Let the fummc be, that our (bules are fo fed with the flcfti &
blood of Chrift, as bred and wine do mainteine and fufteine the bo-
dily life.For othcrwife the proportionall relation of the figne ftiouJd
not agree, vnleflc foulesdid finde their fode in Chrift. Which can
not be done,vnlcfle Chrift do truely growe into one with vs,and rc-
frelh vs with the eating of his ficflic and drinking of his blood. But
although it feeme incredible , that in fo great diftance of places the
flefh of Chrift reacheth to v* that it may be ineatc to vsrlct vs rcmeber
hovvc
lo5aliiauon. Lia4. 572.
howemuch the fccrct pow^ei; of the Spine furmouncech aboucall
ourfenfcs^and howc fopliUUit is to go about to mcaTure his vnmca*
furablencflc by our mcafur c.Thjit therefore which our mindc com-
prehcndeth not,Iet our faith concciue,that the Spirit truely kni teeth
in one ihofc thinges that arc feuered in places. Nowe that fame holy
conamunicating of his body and blood , whereby Chnlt pourcth hi»
life into vs,cucn as if he pearccd it into our bones and uiarowcs,hc
in the Supptr alfo teftifieth and fcalcthiand that not with fetting be-
fore vs a valine or voide figne»but bringing fourth there the eifcCtuaU
worLing of his fpirit,whcreby he fulfilleththat which he promifcch.
And verily he there offreth and dcjiuereth the thing (tgnificd lo all
them that fit at that fpirituall banket: although it berecciucd with
fruit of the faithful! onely , which receiue fo great bountifulncfl'c
with true fjith and thanlcfulncffe ofminde. After which mancrthc
ApoUle faidjtlut the bred which we brcake is the communion of the * Cor,
body of Chrift rand that the cup which we hallowc with the word '*^«*^'
;>nd prayers to rhat purpofe,is the communion of his blood. Ncirher
is there any caufc why any man ihould obicd , that it ii a Hguratiue
fpeche,by which the name of the thing fignified is gcue to the figne,
I graunt verily that tlic breaking of the bred is a figne, not the thing
it felfc.But this being admitted.y ct we (hall rightly gather of the dc-
liuerancc of the figne.thal the ihingit fclfc is dcliuered.For vnleflc
a man will call God a dcceiuer, he can ncucr be fo boldc to fay that
he fettcth before vs an empty figne. Therefore if by the breaking of
bred the Lorde doth truely reprefcntc the partaking of his body,ic
ought to be out of dout that he truely perfiormech and dclincreth it.
And this rule is alway to be holden of the godly , that fo oft as they
fe the n^^nes ordeined of the Lorde,they cercaiuely thinke and per-
fuadc them felues that y tru.th of the thing fignified is there prefenc*
For to what purpofc flfciould the Lord deliuer to thee into tliy handc
the figneofhisbody.buttoalfurcthecof thctrucpartakingof ix>
If it be true,that a vifiblc figne is geuen vs,to fcale the gift of an inui-
fible ihin^ : when we receiue the figne of the body , let vs no Icflc
certainly beleue that the body it fclfe alfo is geuen ys.
n I fay therefore (which both hath bine alway receiued in the
Church , and all they teac'ie at this day that thinke right) that rhc
holymift«:ric of theSiipperconlifteth of two things: that is to fay,
of the bodily figne«, which being fct before our eyes do rcprcfet't
f nto vs jnuifible things according to the capacitie of our we.-ikenefiV;
and of fp.'tiruall trueth,vvhichisby thofc fi^ncs borh fi^^urcdanj
|ie|iuc:cd. Qf vyhat foxtfhat i?, yvhen I mcanc to ihcwc it umihariyji
CCCC ii,j
v^ap.i7. uttne outwardcmeancs
I vfe to fee three things : the fignification, the matter which hangcih
of the fignification, the vertue or efFed wich followcth of both. The
iignihcatipn confiftcth in the promifes , which arc after a certaine
manner wrapped together with the figne. The matter or fubflance
I call Chrift with his death and refurrcdion. By cfFc(fl I vnderibndc
the redemption* righteoufnefTe, fandification, and ctcrnali life , and
whatfoeuer other bencfites Chrift bringethvs, Nowe although all
thefe things haue rcfped to faith : yet I ieaue no place to this cauil-
lation : as though when I fay thatChrift is rcceiucd by faith, I would
bauc him concciucd with vnderftandmg onely and imagination. For
the promifcs offer him,not that we fhouTd fticke faft in the figlit alone
and in bare Imowledgc : butthat welhouJdenioy thetruecommu-
nicaiing ofhim. And trucly I fc not howe any man may haue confi-
dence that he hath redemption and rightcoufneiTe in the crofle of
Chrift , and life in bis death , but principally ftandmg vpon the true
communion of Chrift himfclfe. For thofc good things ihould not
come to vsjvnlefle Chrift iirft made himfclfe ours. I (ay therefore,
that in the mifteric of the Supper , by the (ignes of bread and wine
Chrift is truely deliucred to vs , yea and his body and blood,in which
he hath fulfilled all obedience for purchafing of righteoufneffe to vs:
namely that firft we (hould growe together into one body with him:
and then being made partakers of his fubftance, we may alfo fele his
power in the communicating of all his goo < things.
1 1 Nowe 1 come downe to the exccftiue mixtures; which fuper-
ftitionhath brought in. For herein Satan hath played with marue-
lous fuctehie , that withdcawing the mindes of men from heaucn, h«
might fill them with perucrfe error , as though Chrift were faftencJ
to the element of bred. And fitft we muft nor dreame fuch a prc-
fence of Chrift in the Sacrament , as the craftefment of the court of
Rome haue fained : as though the body of Chrift were made pre-
(ent with prefence of placc,to be handled with handes,tobe broofcd
with teethe, and fwallowed with mouth. For this forme of recanta-
tion Pope Nicolas endited to Berengarius,to be a wicncfTe of his re-
pcntance:namcly with wordes fo far monftruous, that the author of
the glofe aieth out that there is danger , if the reders do not wifely
take hccdeto themfelues, leaft they fhould fucke out of them an he-
refic worfe than was that of Bercngarius. In the fecondc diftindtion,
in the Chapter beginning thus , Ego Berengarius. But Peter Lom-
barde,aUhough he trauasle much m excusing the abfurdicy,yet more
inchneth to the contrary fcntcce.For as we nothing dout that it hath
liiaices according to (he perpetuall nature of tiK body of men ^and
i$
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 575
is holdf n in hcaucn^inco which it was once rccciued,vntit he rcturne
to iudgemcnnfo to draw it backc vndcr thcfc coiruptibic ilemcntcs
or to imagine it prcfcnc eucry whcrc,wc accompt it to be vttcrly vn-
hwfull. Neither vcriJy is ic fo ncdciuU to this that we may enioy the
paitakingcoricforafmuchasthcLordgiucth vs this benefit by hit
Spirice , that we be made one with him in hody^ Spirite , and foulc^
*1 he bonJe therefore of this conioyningc is the Spirite of Chrift,by
tlie knitting wherof we be coupled togethcr,and as it were a certaine f^^'
conduit f by which whatfocucr Chnllhimfelfe bothisandhath ,is jc Soi
eonucicd to vi . For if we beholde the funnc Ihuiinge foorch with his ricu Ui
beames vppon the earth after a certain? maner tocaft forth hisfub* ^^
ftince vnio it to engender, nourifhe, and quicken the frutes thereof:
why (hould the excendmgc of beames of the Spirite of Chrift be in-
fcriour to conuey the communion ot his flclhc and blood uitovs? ,
Where fore the Scripture , whenitfpeaketh of our partakinge with.
Chtift, rcferreth the whole force thereof to the bpiritc. Yet m ftede
of many, one place (halbc fuflScicnc. For Paulc m the eight Chapter
to the Romaincs , faycth that Chrift dwelleth in v$ none otherwifc
than by his Spirit : whereby yci he takcrh not away that communion
of his flcOie and blood of which we now fpeake,but tcachcth that the
Spirite alone workcth that we poiTeflc whole Chrilland hauchim
dwelling in vs.
1 5 The Schoolcmen thought more (hamcfaftly which were with-
holdcn with horrouroffb barbarous vnoodlinelTe.Ycr they al(b the-
fclues do nothing but mocke with futtelerdeceites. They graut that
Chrift IS not contained there by way of cucumfcnption nor after ;i
bodily maner : but afterward they inucnt a way,which neither thcm-
felues do vnderftandc, nor they can declare to other ; yet it is fuch as
falicth to this point that Chrift muft be fought in the forme of bred
as they call rt . For what i? it <? When they fay that the fubftance of
bread is turned into Chrift , do they not faften him to the whuenes
which they there lcaue?But(ray they)hc is fo contained in the Sacra*
ment,that he abideth in heaucn;and we determine no other prefence
but ofh;ibJtudc.But whatfocucr words they bring in to cloke it with
a deceitftill colour, this is the ende of all, that that is by confccration
inade Chriftjwhich before was bread:that from thenfe foorth Chrift
lieth hid vndcr that colour of bread. Which alfo ihcy are not aftia*
mcd in pl.^!ne words ro cxprciTe, For thcfc bey words of Lombardc: zib,^
that the body of Chrift , which in it fcKc is vifiblc , when the confc- aitt,
cration is cndcd,lieih hidden and is couercd vnder the forme of bred.
So the forme of that bread is nothing elfe but a yiibar,tliac takcth a*
Cap.iy. Of the outward meancs
way the light of the flcrti from the cies.Neithcr nede wc many con*
letftures , to finde what fnares they minded to lay wichthefe wordcs^
fith the thinge it felfe plamely fpeaketh it . For it is to be feene with
howe great fupcrftition in ccrtame ages paft* not onely the common!
Ibrtc of men, but alio the very chicfe of them haue bin holdcn, and
at this day be holden in popilhe Churches. For hauinge Utic care of
true Faich(by which alone we both come into y' felowihtp of Chrift,
and do clcaue together with him)fo that rhey haue a carnal prefcncc
of him, which they haue framed bcfidc the worde, they thmkc th::t
they haue him prcfent enough. Therefore in a fummc , we fee that
-^ this hath bin gotten by this witty futtclty > that bcead was taken for
God.
14 From henfe proceeded that fame fained tranfubftantiation, for
which at this day they fight more earncftly than for all the other ar*
tides of their faith. For the firft builders of that locall prefence could
not vnwinde thcmfclues fro this douc how the body of Chrift (hould
be mingled with the fubftance of bread»but that by and by many ab-
furdities did thruft themfchies in place. Therefore they were diiuen
of necefTity to Bee to his inuention, that there is made a turninge of
bread into the bodymot that the body is properly made of God, but
becaufe Chrift,ihat he might hide himfclfc vnder the forme, bring-
cth the fubftancc to nothing. But ic is m.iruelous, that they fell to fo
great ignorancc,yea fenfekfTc dulncfTcthat not onely the Scripture
but alfo the confent of y old Church fighting againft ir,they brought
abroade that monger. I graunt in dede that (ome of the olde writers
fomtimc vfedthe name of turning ; not for that they wouldc dcftroy
the fubftance in the outwardc figncs, but that they might teachc that
the bread dedicate to the myttery difFereth farre from common bread
and is no we other. But cch where they all plainely declare, that the
holy Supper contiftcth of two partes,an earthly partc>3nd a hcaucn-
ly;and the earthly part they do without controuerfie expound to be
bread and wine . Trucly whatfoeuer they babble , it is plaine that in
confirming of this dodrinc they want the defenfc of antiquity ,which
they oftentimes pre fume to fee againft the cui dent word of God. For
it is not Co long ago fince it was inuentcd : it was verily vnknowc not
only to thofe better ages, in which the purer dodrine of religion yet
flori(hed , but alfo eucnwhcn that fame purcnefTc was much defiled.
There is none of the old writers that doth not in exprefic words con-
feflc that the holy fignes in the Supper arc bread and wineralthough,
as wc haue fayd^they fometimc fette it out with diucrfe titles, to ad-
oauncc the dignity of the myftcry. For whereas they fay that •" ^h?
To Saluation. Lib.4. 574
confccration is raadc a fecrece turning, tbai now it is an other thing
than bread and wine : I hauc cuen now giucn warningc that they do
not thereby meanc that the things thelelues are brought to nought,
hut that they are now to bcothcrwifc eftcmed than comon meates,
which arc appointed only to fcedc the bellycforafmnch as in thecnis
dciiuercd to vs the fpirituall meateanddrinVcof the foulc.This wc
alfo deny nor. If(ray thefe men)thcre be a turninge , it muft needet
he that there is of one thinge made an other thinge. If they rocane
that thtre is fome thinge made which before was not, I agree witK
them. If they will draw ic to f their owne imagination,(et them aun-
fwcre me whatchagc they thinkc to be made in bapiifme.For here-
in the Fathers alfb do determine a marucUous turning, whc they fay
that of a corrupnble element is made a fpirituiU wadiing of the foulc^
yet none of cheni denieth that water remaincth. But(fay they)therc
is no fuch thing in baptifmCjas is that in the Supper.This is my body.
As though the qucftion were of thofe words.which haue a meaning
plainc enough:& not rad5er,of y word of turning,which ought to fi-
gnify no more in the Supper tha in baptifme.Therforc farcwel they
with thefe fnares of fyllables, whereby they do nothing clfe but be-
wray their owne hungrincfle. For orhcrwife the lignification wouldc
not agree together , vnlclfc the trueih which is there figured , had a
luicly image in outward figne. Chr;ftci wil was by the outward fignc
to tertilic that his fit fli is meate. If he did fee before vs only an empty
imaginatiue forme of bread not true bread , where were the corcla-
tion or limihtude which Ihouide Icadc vs fro the viliblc thing to the
inuifible ? For, that all thinges may agree together , the fignification
(hall cxtcndc no furthcr.but that we be fed with the forme of the flcfli
of Chrid. ASjifin baptifoiey forme of water lliould dccciuc oureics,
it ihouldc not be to vs a certainc pledge of our waihinge:yca by that
deceitfull ihcwe there lliould be giuen vs anoccafionof waucrmgc.
Thcrfore the nature of the Sacrament is ouerthrowen, vnlefTc in tiic
manor ofiagi;ify;ng,the earthly figne anfwere to the heauenly thing.
And thcrfore we ioofc the trueih of this myfteryjVnleffe true bread
reprcfcnttovsthetrucbodyofChnft. Ircpeate itagainc •• Sichihc
S,uppcr is nothing che,than a vifible ttftifyingc ofthatpromifc which
is in the ^.chapter of lohn, namely y Chrift isihe bread oflifcjwhich
came downe fro hraucn:;here mult be viflblc bread vfed for a meant*
whereby rh.it fame fpiritual bread may be ficiuredivniefle we will that
we Ioofc all the frutc, which in this behalfc God tenderly graunteth
to fuft.iine our weakenefle. Now by what reafon (hould Paule gather, ^ p
ihat all wc arc one body and one bread, which do together partake 10.17^
Cap.
_ .17. Of the outward mcancs
of one bread) if there remained on^y an iniaginauuc forme & not ra^
thcr a nacurall crueth of bread?
»i 5 But they could neucr haue bin To fbwiy begiled with y deceiret
of Satan^buc btc^ufc they were already bewitched with this errour,
ihat the body of- Chrift enclofcd vnder bread was by y bodily mouth
fent downe into the belly. The caufe offo brutifti imagination was,
that confecration (igniHed as much amonge them as a magicall en-
chaunrment. But this principle was vnknowen to them,that bread it
a Sacrament to none but tp men, to whom the word is direded : like
as the water of baptifme is not changed in it felfe^but fo foonc as the
prumife is adioirked^it beginncch to be that to vs which it before was
0.17 not. This fhall better appearc by example of a hkc Sacrament. The
water fpringing out of the rocke in the delcrt was to the- fathers a to-
^**'' ken and Ggne of the fame thing , which the wine doth figure to vs in
the Supper . For Paule teacheth that they dronke the fame fpirituall
diinke. Butitwasacommonwateringe for the beaftes and catcll of
the people. Whereupon it is eafily gathered,that in earthly elements,
when they are applied to a fpirituall vfe , there is made no other tur-
ningc but in refped of men , in fo much as they arc to them fcales of
the promifcs. Moreouer firh Gods purpofc is(as I often repeate)a$
It were by handfome chariots to lift vs vppe to himfelfe , they do by
their way wardnefTe wickedly difappoint the fame,which do in decde
call vs to Chrift, but lurking inuilibly vnder bread. For it is not pof*
fiblc that the minde of men, vficombring it telfe from the immeafii-
rableneife of places,ihould atcaine to Chrift euen aboue the heauens^
That which nature dented them , they attempted to amende with a
more hurtful! remedy:that abiding in earth,we Ihould ncede no hea-
ucnly neercneffe of Chrift. Loe, this is the neccfliiy,that compelled
them to transfigure the body of Chrift. In Bcrnardcs rime,althcugh
a harder maner of fpeaking was growen in vfe, yet tranfubftantiation
was not then kuowen. And in all ages before that, this fimilicude did
fiiepboutin eucry mans mouth , that there is with bread and wine a
fpiritunll thing ioyncd in this myftery. Of the wordesthey anfwere,
as they thinke,wirtily:but bringing nothing fit for this prefcnc caufe.
3 . . The rod of Mofcs (fay they)being turned into a Serpentjahhough it
^lo. did get the name of a Serpent, yet keepeth ftill the olde namc^ and is
called a rod. So in their opinion it is as probable, that although the
bread pafle into a newe fubftance,tr may be abufiucly and yet not vn-P
aptly called that which it appeareth to the eics. But whatUkclihoodc
ornereneflc findc they bctwenca cleare miracle,and their fained iHu-
fion,of which no cic in earth i$ witncffe?Thc Ma^iciaiis had mocked
lo5aluation. Lib.4. 575
witK 6ccckc$,Co that the iEgyptians were perfwadc<I,that they ex-
celled in diuinc power to change creatures aboue the order of na«
lure. Mofcs came forih,and dnuinge away all ihcir dcceirc$,(hewc<l
that the inuincibic power of God was on his Jidc , bccaufe his ownc
rod confumed all the rcl\. But forafmuch as that was a turningc di-
icernable with cies, therefore as we hauc fayd^it pcrtaincth nothinge
to this prefent caufc : and in a liilc time artcr,ihc rod vi(ibly returned
into his owne forme. Befide that it is not knowe,wi)cther that fuddeti
turning was of fublbncc or no. AlCo the alludinge to the rods of the
Magicians is to be conh*dercd, which the Prophet therefore woulde
not call Serpcntes ,leaft he flioulde fceme to (ignih'c a turningc where
none was : becaufe thofc deceiuers had done nothinge buccaft a myft
before the eies of the beholders. What hkencfle herewith hauc tlicOt
formes of fpceche. The bread which we brcake,So oft as yc fhali catc ^ ^
this bread, They communicated in breaking ofbrcad,& fuch others to.ii.
It is ccrcainechat their cies were onely deceiued with the cnchaunc^^ & ti.
ment of the Magicians. As concemingc Mofcs , the matter is more •^
doucfull , by whofe handc it was no more hard for God to make of a ^*'^^
rod a Serpent , nndagaine of a Serpent to make a rod , than to doth
Angels with flclhcly bodies , and byandby after to vncloth chcm. if
the nature of thismyftcry were the fame or hke , there were (bmc co-
lour for their folution. Let this therefore remainc certainc> that itit
not trucly nor fitly promifed v$ that in the Supper the flc(h of Chrift
is.truely to vs for meatc , vnlcflfc the true fubftancc of the oocwarde
Signc agree with it* And (as onecrrotirgrowechof anothcr)the
place of lercmyis To fooliflicly wrcficd to protie tranfubftantiationi
chat it irketh inc to rehcarfc it. The Prophet complaincth that wood
IS put in his bread ; meaningc that by the cruelty of his enemies, hii ^^* "
bread was infcded with bittemeflc . As Dauid with a like figure be • p^^ g„
waileth that his meatc was corrupted With gall , and his drinkc with jx.
vincger. Thefe men will hauc it that the body of Chrift was by way
of alle^ioric fattened to the crofTc . But fomc of the oldc fathers
thought fo. As though we ought not rather to pardon their igno*
ranee , and to buric their {hamc,than to addc /hamelefneflc to com*
pell them yet flill to Hght like enemies with the naturall meaoinge of
the Prophet.
16 Othcr,which fee that the proportionall relation ofthefignc fit
the thinge fignificd , can not be oucrthrowen, but that the trueth of
the myftcry muft fall,do confeflTe that the bread of the Supper is VC'
rily a fubftancc of an earthly and corruptible clement, and fuffereth -^-V^
00 change in ic iclfe,but hath vndcr it feifc the body of ChhU enclo-
Gap.i7. Of the outward mcancs
led . If they did fo declare chejr mcaninge , that when the brcac? is
dcliucred m the myfterie , chcre is adioyned the delmeringc of the
body, becaufc tht tructhis vnfcucrable from the figne : Iwouldtf
not much ftriuc with them. But becaufc they placing the body in the
bread, do faincto it a beingceuery where contrary to the nature
thcrof, and in adding vnder the bread,they will haiic it he there hi d**
defi:it isneceflarie ahtlevvhilctodrawefuch futtekicsoutof their
dennes. For my mind is not yet as of fet purpofe to go thvough with
all this point : but only that I may lay the fundadons of the difputa*
tion which ihall byandb-y folowe in place fittefor it.Thcy will there-
fore hauc the body of Chnft to be inuifible and immeafurable,that it
may he hid vndcr the bread : becaufe they thinkc they do not other-
wife communicate with him than if he defcend into brcad;but they
comprehend not the manerof defcending, wherby he hfccth v$ vp-
ward to himfelfe. Thc)' lay vpon it all the colours that chey can:but
when they hauc faid alJ,tt fufficiently appcareth,that they Oay vpon
the locall pre fence ofChriil. Whcnfecommctii that?eiren becaufc
they can ?bidc to concciueno other partaking of the fle(h & bloody
but which coniiflech either of ioyning ind touchingc of place, or of
feme grofle enclofing.^^.- vcfbr od ybribh <*
17 And, that they may obftinatly defendc tlic errour onccraflily
ccBicciUedjfomc of thcm-ftickc not to fay,that the ftcfti <>^ChTift had
ncutr any other meaUirings, but fo far & wide as hcatien and earth
is broad. Whereas he was borne a child out of the wombe,wftereai
he grcwjwhereas he was (^ncad-abroadon thccroiTe^whems he was
cnclofcd in the fcpuiehrc,thc fame was done by a oc^taine difpcnfa^^
tion, that he might be borne & die, & pcrforme the whcr dueties of
a.i.j man.Wheras after his rcfurredio he was feenc in his wonted forme
uSc 7, of body,whera$ he was taken vp to heaue,wherffs laft of all alfo after
5»&- 5- his afcenlion he was fecne of Stephen and Paulc : it was done by the
fame dilpcnfation , that it might appeare to the fighc of men that he
was made a king in heauen What is this elfe,bot 10 raife vp Marcion
out of hell } For no man can dout that the body of Chrift was a fan-
tafie or a fantaihcall thinge,!f he was of fuch ftate. Some flippc away
fomwhatmore futtelly t widi faying that this body which is giuen iti
the Sacrament is glorious and immortall : and that therefore it is no
aibfurdity , iTit be contained in many places, if in no pbce,'if withno
^rmc, vndcr the facrament. But I aske what manner of body Clmft
gauetothcdifciplo the day before that he fuffred.do not the words
fct.tj. foundc that he giue the fame mortall body,which was within a litlc
* after to be dcliucred ? He had already before ( fay chey ) (he wed his
glory
I
ToSaluanon, Lib4. 57^
clory to befcenc to three of thcdifciplcs. That is true in deedc^but
his will was by that bnghtncs to give them a tali of immortality for
an hourc. In the mcane time tliey (hall not there 6ndc a double bo-
dy,but that one body which ChriQ did bcarc,garni{hcd with newc
glory. But when he diftributed his body at hi; fir(t Supper, the time
was now at hand,when he being ftrikcn of God,and humbled fhould ^^*-ih
lie without glory as a leprous man.'fofaris itofthat hethen woulde ^
(hew forth the glory of his refurrcdion. And how great a window is
here opened to Marcion»jf the body of Chnft was fcenc in one place
mortal and bafcyand in an other place was holden immortal! & glo-
rious^Howbeit if their opinion take place, the fame happeneth dai-
ly : becaufc they are compelled to confeffc thatthc body of Chrift
bcingc vifible in it felftf,hcth hid inuifibly rndcr the figne of bread.
And yet chcy that vomit outfuch monftruoufnes^are fo not aOiamed
of their ownc (lisme, that they do vnprouoked hainoufljr rade at vs,
becaufc we do not fubfcribc to them. *;* .". r-br:'."'
18 Now if th ey hft to faft5 the body & blood of the Lord to bred
ic winc:thc one ihall of necclFity be plucked in fundcr fro the othcrr
For as the bread is dcliuercd feuerally from the cup/o^ie body Tni«
ted to the bread mu(i nedes be diuided fro the blood chdofcd in the.
cup. For when they affirme that the body is in the bread & thC' blood
in the cup ; & the bread & wine are by fpaces of place diftant the one
&.5 the other ; they can by no (hift cfcape,but that the body muft be
Euc'.ed fro cheblood.Bucvvhercas they are wont to alleagc,thac bir
« jc«'>paninc(as they faine)jn the body is the blood , & likcwifc in thc-
blood is the body, thatTcrily is too tpflingtforafmuch as the Signcs,
in. \'<hich. they arc enclofed,are fo feuered.But if we be lifted vp with,
©ur cie< $: mindes to heaucn, that we fecke Chrift therein the glory
of his kingdomras the (igncs do allure vs to him wholc>ro vnder the
^c- of bread,wc fhalbc fed with his bociy,vndtr the (ignc of wine
we (hall fcuer jlly drinke his blood,that at length we may enioy him
whoIe.For althougli he hath taken away his fteOic from vf,and in his
^odv is afccndcd vp into heaucn, yet he fitteth at the righthandc of
iheFather,rliat is ro fav,hc rcigneth in rhe powcr,& maiefty,& glo-
ry of the F:ithcr.This kingdom is neither bounded with any fpaces
ofplace^nor compaflcd about with any mcafuringcs, but thacChriflt
may (hew forth his might wherefoeuer it plcafeth him both in hea-
ucn and in carth-.but that he may (hew himfclfc prcfent with power
and ftrcngth:butthathcmayalv¥3y be at hande with them that be
hisjbreathinghis life into thcm,mayltueinthcm, ftrcngchen ihemi
^icke thcm^prcfcruc chctn rafe^cucn as if he were prcicm in bodjh
Cap.i7* Of the outward mcancs
finally but rfiat he may fecdc them with his ownc bo<iy,rhc commii-
nion whereof he doth by the power of his Spirite poui c into them.
After this maner the body & bioodof Chriftisdchucred to vs in the
Sacramenr.
19 But we moft appoint fuch a prcfcnce of Chrift in y Supper,as
* may neither f^^iien him to the clement of bread , nor fliut him vp in
the bread i nor by any mcane compaflfe him in , (for it is pUinc that
all thefe thingcx abate his heaucnly glory ) Hnally fuch as m^y nei*
iher takcirom him his ownc meafurcnor diueril/ drawc him m nat
ny places at once, nor fame to him fuch an vnmcafurable greatntfTc
ai is fpread abroadc throughoat heauen and earth, for thcfe thingcs
are plainely againft the trueth of the nature of mnnhoode. Let vs ( I
{ay)ncwcr fuffer ihcfc two exceptions to be taicen away from vs. The
oncthat nothing be abated from the glory of Chrjft,which is done*
X^hen he is brought vnder the corruptible cltmcntesofthisworlde^
or IS bound to any earthly creatures.The other^ihat nothinge be by
fainingappiiedto his body^that agrceth not with the nature of man:
vhich (sdone ,.whcn it i$ either layd to be infinite , or is fet in manf
places at once. But thefe abfurdutes being taken away, I willingcfy
cecciue whatfocuermav aunylc to eTcpreflTcthe true and fubAantiall
comrounicating of the Body and Blood of the Lord,which commu-
nicating irdcliucrcd to the faithful vnder the holy (igncs of the Sup-
pcr:& fo that they may be thought not to receiue it by imagination
only or vnderlbnding of mindc,but to cni»iy it in dcede to the foodc
of eternallljfc. Why this fcntcncc is Co hatcfull to the woild,& all dt*
fence tjken away from it by the vniuft Judgements of many , there if
jro cauie at all,but for that the dcuill hath with horrible bewicchinge
»addtd their mindes. Tniely that which we tc3ch,doih in all point*
very well agree with the Scripturesnt conraincth neither any abfwr-*
dity , nor darkencfle , nor doutfulnelTe : it is not againft true godlt-
nefle and found edific3tton:finalIy it hath nothinge in it,thai m.iy of-»
f*nd,(3uing that in certaincsges paft,whc that ignorance and barba*
iwufneffe of Sop-iftcrs reicned in the Church , (o cleare light and o-^
pen truth hath bin vnworthily oppreffed.Yet becauie Sara atihitdajr
alfotrauaileth by rroublefome Spintcs to fpot it wiihall the Iclaun-^
dcrs and reproches that he can , and bendeth himfelfe to no oiher
rhinge with greater cndtuoar :it is proHtabic the more dtligcncly ta
dcfend andrefcucit.
zo Nowc before that we go any further, we muft entreare of the
fclfc inftitutTonof Chrift : fpecially becaufe this is the moft glo'iout
^bie^on thatousr aducrfaries hauc^that we dcpan from the wordet
of
To Saliiation. Lib.4. 577
of Chrift. Therefore that we may be difcharged of the falfe caufe of
nulice wherewith they burden vs , our fitceft bcginninge iTiall be at
the expofitionofthe words. Three Euangcliftes and Paul rchearfc, Mat.itf
thacChnft tooke bread,when he had giuen thinks he brake it,gaue 26.
it to his djfciples and fayd, Take eate : this is my Body which is de- Mar.14.
liiiercd , or broken for you. Of the cuppe Matthewe and Marke fay **
thus. This cuppe is the blood of the Newc tefhimcnt, which fhallbe ,^ *
iliedde for many vnio forgiuencire of (innes. But Piul and Luke fay 1 Cor.
thus ; This cuppe is the Newetcftament in my blood.The patroncs »i-a4«
ottranfubftantiation will haue by the pronounc (this) the forme of
bread to be (ignificd , becaufc the confecration is made in the whole
content of the fentcnce , and there is no fubftance that can be flic-
wed. But if they be holden with religious care of the vvofdes,becau(«
Chrift teftuiedjthat that which he reached into the difciplcs handes,
was his body : truely this their deuife, that that which was bread is
nowe the body , is moft farre from the proper meanmge of them.
That which Chrift tooke into hishandcs and gaue the Apoftles,
he affirmcth to be his body : but he tooke bread: who therefore can
not vnderftande that bread is yet flicwed ? and therefore there is no
greater abfui dity,than to rcmoue that to the forme, which is fpokeri _
of the bread. Other, when they expounde this wordj (is) for(to be
tranfubrtanciate , ) do flee to a more enforced and violently wrafted
glofe. Therefore there is no caufe why they Ihould prcrende ihat
they be moued with reuercnce of wordes. For this was vnheaj d of
amonge all nations and languagcSjthat the word(is)fhould be taken
in thisfenfejnamely for to be turned into an other thing. As for the
that leaue bread in the Supper, and aftirme that there is the body of
Chnftjthey much diffn- amoni: therafclue\ They which fpeake more
modcftly, although they precifeiy exadthc letter ; This is my body,
yet afterward fwarue from their prccifenefTc^and fay that it is as much
in cflfed as that the body or Chrift is with bread, in bread, and vnder
bicad.Of the matter it felfe which they affirme,wc haue alrcdy tou-
ched fomwhat, and weftiallby and by haueoccafion yet to fpeake
more. Now I difpute only of the wordes,by which they fay they arc
refti aincd that they can not admit bread to be called the body , bc-
caufe it is a figne of the body. But if they (hunne all figures.why do
they Icape away from the pjaine fhcwinge of Chiift , to their ownc
mar.ers of fpeaking farre difFeringe from it? For there is great diffe-
rence betwcne this that bread is the body, and this that the body is
with bread. But becaufe they fawc it to be impoflible,that this (iira-
pic propoficion might ftandc , that bread is the bodv : they haue ac«
DDDD
Cap. 1 7. Of the outward mcanes
tempted to fcapc away by thofc formes of fpccche, as it were by cro-
ked turningcs . Some more boldeftickcnocEoaffirmcthateocn in
proper fpeakinge, bread is the body , and by this mcane they trucly
proue themfclues to be licerall men. If it be obieded,that therefore
the bread is Chrift,and is God:this verily they will dcny^bccaufcttis
not expreffed m the wordcs of Chrift . But they fhall nochm^c prc-
uaile by dcnymge it : forafmuch as all do agree that whole Chrift is
offered vs in the Supper. But it is an intolerable blafphemy, that it be
without figure fpoken of a fraile and corruptible element , that it is
Chrift.Now I askc ofthemjwhether thefe two propofitions be both
of one cffeifl , Chrift is the Sonne of God , and bread is the body of
Chrift . If they graunt that they arc diuers , ( which we will enforce
them to graunt whether they will or no) then lette them aunfwerc
whence commeth the difference.! thinkc they wil bring none other
but that the bread is after the facramcntall manner called the body.
Whereupon folowcth, that Chriftcs wordes arcnotfubied tothc
common rule, nor ought to be tried by Grammar. Alfo I aske of all
the precifc and ftiffe requirers of the letter,wherc Luke and Paule do
call the cuppe the teftament in the blood , whether they do not cx-
preffc the fame thing which they did in the farft parte,where they cal
bread the body.Trucly the fame rehgion was in the one pane of the
myftery that was in the otherrand becaufe fhortneffe is darke, longer
fpeech doth better open the meaningc. So oft therefore as they fliall
affirme by one worde , that the bread is the body : 1 wiH out of moc
wordes bringc .i fictc expofition,that it is the Teftament in the body.
For why ? Shall we neede to fecke a more faithfull or furer expofi-
tor than Paule and Luke ? Neither yet do I tcnde hereunto,to dimi-
nish any thing of that communicating of the body of Chrift which I
haue confelT^-dronly my purpofe is to confute that foohfh waiward*
nclfejwherby they do fo hatefully brawle about words. I vnderftand,
by the authority of Paul & Luke, that the bred is the body of Chrift,
becaufe it is the couenant in the body. If they fight againft this,thcy
haue warre not with me,butwiththe Spiritcof God. Howefoeucr
they cry out that they be touched with reucrence of the wordes of
Chnft, whereby they doe not figuratiuely vnderftand thofc thinges
that are plainly fpoken: yet this is not a pretence rightfull enough,
whythey Ihoulde fo refufeall the rcafons which wcobiedl to the
contrary. In the meane time, as I haue already giuen warning, it is
conuenient to barne,what maner of thing this is , The teftament in
the body and blocd of Chrift: becaufe the couenant ftabh(hed with
tt^c facnficc of dwath^lliould otherwifc not profit vs,vnleffe there were
adioyned
ToSaliiation. Lib.4. 578
adioyned that fccrct commumcatinge whereby wc growc into one
with Chrift.
21 It remaincth therefore that for ilic affinity which y things (i-
gnificd hauc with tlieir fignes , we confcire that the fclfe name of the
thing was giuen to the ligne:hguratiucly in decdc,bat not without a
xnoft fit proportionall agreemcnt.I Icaue allegories and parable$,leaft
any man ihould quarell thati fceke ftartinge holes , and wander out
of the prefcnt purpofe. I fay that this is a Ipeeche by figure of tranf-
nomination which is commonly vfcd jn the Scripture , when myftc-
rics are entreated of. For neither can you otherwife vnderftand that
which is fayd : that circumcifion is a couenant : that the jambc is the
Pafleouer : that the Sacrifices of the lawc are expiacions:fanally th^c
the rockCjOut of which water flowed in the deferi, wasChrilt:vnltflc
you take it to be fpoken by way of transferringe of names. Neither
arc names transferred only from the hier name to the iowcr.-but co-
trariwife the name of the vifible fi^ne is aifo giuen to the thinge fi-
gnified ; as when it is fayd that God appeared to Mofes in the bufhe: p^?*!''
when the arke of couenant is called God, and the face of God: g 1 .j
and the doue is called the holy Ghoft. For though the fignc differ in j.
fubftance flom the thinge fignificd:becaufe this is fpiritual and hea- M^ccj.
uenly,and that is corporall and vifiblc:yct bccaufe it doth not only fi- * ^*
gure the thinge which it is holily appointed to rcprefent, as a nsked
and empty to:<en , but doth alfo truely dehucr it in dcede : why may
not tlie name of the thing rightly accorde with it?Ifiigncs deuifed by
mcnne, which arc rather images of thingcs abfent , than markes of
thinges prefentjwhichfelfe abfent thin;4S,they do oftentimes deceit-
fully fliadovv, arc yet fomtime garniflied with the titles of the things:
then thofc things that are ordained of God, do by much greater rca-
fon borrow the name of thofc things,of which they alway both bearc
a furc and not dcceitfull fignification, and hauc the trueth adioyiied
with them. There is therefore fo great likencfle and nercnefTe of the
one to the othcr,that it is cafie to draw their names to & froe.Thcr-
fore let our aduerfarics ceaffe to heape vnfauory fcoftini;s againft vs,
in callinge vs Tropiftcs.becaufc wc expounde the :5acramcntall ma-
ncr of fpeaking after the common vfe of the Scripture. For whereas
the Sacramentes agree together in many thingcs:in this transferring
of namcSjthey haue all a cerrainc community together. As therefore
the Apoftle tcacheth,that the ftone out of which fpirituall drinke did
fpringe to the Ifraelitcs, was Chrift, becaufe it was a vifible figne,vn-
dcr which tharfpiritualldrinkc wastrufly indccdc butnotdifccrna- p
biy to y cic pcrcciucdifo bread is at this day called y body of Chrift, ^^ . *
.DDDD ij
Cap. 1 7. Of the outward mcancs
foralmuch as it is a fignc whereby che Lorde offereth to v$ the tnie
eatinge of his bodie . Neither did Auguftine othcrwife thinkc or
fpeakc , leart any man (houlde dcfpifc this as a ncwe inuention . If
(fayth he) the Sacramenies haddcnot acertaynelikcncire of thofc
thinges whereof they are Sacramcntes , they rtioulde not be Sacra-
mentes at ail . And of this hkenefl'e oftentimes they take the names
of the thinges themfelues. As therefore after a certaine manner the
Sacrament of the body of Chrift,«s the body of Chrift:the Sacrament
of the blood of Chrift, is the blood of Chrjft : fo the Sacrament of
faith is faith.There be in him many Ukc places, which it were fuper-
6uous to heape togctherjfith that fame one fuffifeth : fauing that the
readers muft be warned that the holy man tcachcth the fame thingc
in the Epsftle to Enodius. But it is a triflinge (hift to fay , that where
Auguftme teacheth, that when transfcrringe is often and common-
ly vCcd in myfteries , he maketh no mention of the Supper : becaufe
if this fliift were recciucd , we might not reafon from the generaltic
to the fpecialltie , neither were this a good argument : Euery fechng
creature hath power of mouinge, therefore an oxe andahorfe hauc
power of mouinge. Howebeitlongdifputation hereof is in an other
place ended by the wordcs of the fame holy manjwhere he faithjihat
Chrjft fticked not to call it his bodie , when he gaue the figne of his
body. Againft Adimantus , the Manichean , in the iwelue Chapter.
And in an other place, vpon the third Pfalme. Maruelous (fayth he)
is the patience of Chrift,that he receiued ludas to the banket, where-
in he committed anddcliuercd to his difciples the figure of his body
and blood.
Z2 But if fome precife man,beingc blinde at all the reftjdo ftandc
onely vppon this worde ( this is ) as though it feoered this myfteric
from all other, the folution is ea(ie. They fay that the vehemence of
the fubftantiue verbe(is)is fo great that it admitteth no fioure.Which
Cor. jfyyj. giaunt to tliem : euen m the wordcs of Paule is rcddc the fub -
*'*^* ftantiue verbe , where he callcth bread the communicatinge of the
body of Chrift. But the communieatingc is an other thinge than the
body It felfe. Yea commonly v/here facramentesare entreated of,wc
icn.17 finde the fame worde vCed, As: This fliall be to you a coucnant with
3. mc . This lambc ftiall be to you a Paffeouer . To rchcarfe no moe:
xo. I » vvhen Paule fayeth that the rockc was Chiift , why do they take the
i^ fubftantiuc verbe in that place to be of lefle vehemence than in the
3.4, * fpeechc of Chrift ? Lette them alfo aunfwereiwhere lohn fayth , the
ohn.7. holy Ghoft was not yet, becaufe lefus was not yet glorified,of what
9* foric the fubftantiuc verbc is in that place . For if they abide faftfc-
ncd
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 57^
ncd to their rule, the ccemallcflencc of the holy Ghoft flialbcdc-
ftroyed,as though it tooke beginning at the Afccnfion ot'Chrift.Fi-
nally let them aunfwercwhat meaneth that faying of Paul,tha£ bap- ^-^
tifmc is the washing of regeneration and renuing,which it is euident
to be vnprofitable to many.But nothing is ftronger to confute them,
than chat fayine of Paule, that the Church is Cbrift. For, bringingc i.Cor,
a fimilitude of tne body of manne, he addeth, So is Cbnft ; in which n. 1 2*
place he vndcrftandeth the onJy begotten fonne of God, not in him
felfe , but in his members . Hereby I thinkc I haue obtayncd that to
fbundcwitted and vncorrupied men the fclaunders of our enemses,
arc lothfome , when they fprcad abroade , that we withdrawc credit
from the wordes of Chrift:which we do no ieflc obediently embrace
than they, and do wey them with more godly reuerence. Yea their
neghgent carclcfnefTc fhewcththat they do not greatly care what
Chrift ment, fo that it giue them a buckler to dcfcnde their obftina-
cic : like as our cariieft learchinge ought to be a witnelle howe much
we citeemc the authority of Chrift . They odioufly fpread abroadc»
that naturall fcnfc of man withboldcth vs from belcuing that which
Chrift hath vttcred with hisownc holy mouth; but how roahciouf-
ly they burden vs with thisfclaunder , I haue a great parte already
made plainejand hereafter it fhall more clearely appcare. Therefore
nothing withholdeih vs from beleuing Chrift when he fpeakcthjnoc
from obeying fofoonc as he doth but with becke will this or that^
Only this is the queftion, whether it be vnlawefull to enquire of the
naturall meaning.
z 5 Thcfe good maifters.that they may feme well lettrcd,do for-
bid men to dcparte beit ncuer fo jitle from the letter.Eut I on the o«
ther fide , when the Scripture namerh God a warhke man , becaufc t
fee that without figuratiuc tran{lati5 it is too rough a maner of fpea-
king,do notdout that it is a comparifon taken from men. And true-
ly*vpon none other pretence in the old time the Anthropomorphits
troubled the true teachingc Fathers,but that catchingc fall holde of
thefc fayingSjThe cics of God do fee. It wet vp to his eares,HJs hancE
ftretched out, The earth his footeftole, they cried out that God had
his body taken from him, which the Scripture adigneth vnto him. If
this lawe be rcceiued , outragious barbaroufnefle fhail ouerwhelrhc
the whole light of faith. For , what monftersof abfurdiiies may noc
phrentike me pickc ouc,if it be graunted them to alleage cucry (mall
title to ftablifti their opinions ? That which they obied,th3t it is not
|ikely,that when Chrift prepared for his Apoftlcs a (ingular comfort
iflad«cr{jties,hc did then fpeakc in a riddle or d3rkely,makcthofoiir
DDDD iij
Cap.17. Of the outward meancs
fide.i^or if It bad not come in the mindes of the ApoftIes,that bread
was figuratiucly called the body , becaufe it was the ligne of the bo-
dy ,they had without dout bin troubled with fo monftruous a thing.
Almoftatthe fame moment lohnrcporteth that they didftickein
perplexitic at euery of the Icaft difficultics.They which ftriuc among
themfelues, how Chrift will go to the Fatherrand do moue queftion,
how he will go out of the wotld:they which vnderftand nothinge of
thofc thinges that are fpokcn conccrningc the heauenly Father , till
they fee him : how would they haue bin fo eafie ro beleue that which
all rcafon refufethjihat Chrift fitteth at the boordc in their fight,and
is enclofed inuifible vnder bread ? Whereas therefore they in eating
the bread without doutinge,teftificd their confent, hereby appeareth
that they cooke Chrilks wordcs in the fame fenfe that we do, be-
caufe they rcmembred that which ought not to fceme ftrange in my-
fieriesjthat the name of the thing (ignified is transferred to the figne.
Therefore it was io the difciples , as it is to vs , a certaine and clearc
comforte,cntangcl'-d with no riddlc.Neithcris there any other caufe
why fome fhoulde dcpartc from our expo(ition,but becaufe the cn-
cbauntmcnt of the deuil hath blinded them,namely that they (hould
faine d.irkcnefrc to thcmfeluesjwhere the expofition of an apt figure
offrcth it felfe.Moreouer if we precifely ftand vpon the words, Chrift
ihould wrongfully haue fpoken in one place feuerally an other thing
coccrning the bread than he fpeakech of the cup.He callcth the bred
his bodvjhe calleth y wine his blood:eithcr it (halbe a confufed vainc
rcpetition,or it fhalbe fuch a partitio as fhal diuide the body from the
blood. Yea it fhall as truely be faid of the cup. This is my body, as of
the bread it felfe, & it may likewife enterchangeably be fayd.that the
bread is the blood. If they anfwere that we muft cofider to what end
or vfe the fignes were ordained: I graunt it in dede:but in the meanc
time they fhal not vnwinde thefelutSjbui that their errour muft draw
this ahfordity with it,that the bread is the blood,and the wine is the
body. Nowc 1 wote not what this meaneth , when they graunt the
bread and the body to be diucrfe things,yct to affirme that the one is
fpoken of the other properly & without any figurc:as if a man (hould
fay that a garment is in dede a thing differing from a man,& yet that
it is properly called a man.In the mcane while as though their vido-
ry confifted in obftinacy & railing , they fay that Chrift is accufcd of
lyinge, if an cxpofition be fought of the wordcs. Nowe it (halbe ea(ic
for vs to (liew to the readers how vniuft wrong thefc catchers of (yl-
lables do to vs , when they fill the fimple with this opinion , that we
withdraw credit from the words of Chiift, which wc haue proucd to
be
To Valuation. JLib.4. 5 00
be furioufly peruertcd and confounded by thcm,but to be faithfully
and rightly expounded by vs.
24 But the fclaunder of this lie can not be vtterly purged , till an
other crime be wiped away. For they fpread abroadc, that we be fo
addided to naturallreafon, that we giue no more to the power of
Godjthan the order of nature fuffereth, & common fenfe ccachcth.
Fro fo mahcious fclaunders I appelle to the very dodrinc it felf which
1 haue declared : which doth clcarcly enough fliew,y I do not mea-
lure this myftery by the proportion of mans realbn , nor do make it
fubieft to the lawes of nature. I befeech you, haue we learned out of
naturall philofophie, that Chrift doth fo fro heauen fcede our foules
and bodies with his flclli,a$ our bodies are nourifhed with bread and
wine? Whence cpmeth this power tofleih,that it may giue hfe f All
men wil fay that it is not done naturally. 1 1 wil no more pleafc mans
rcifon, that the ticllie of Chnft reacheth to vs, that it may be foode
vnto vs. Finally whofoeuer hath tatted of our dodrine > (halbe raui-
fhed into admiration of the fecrete power of God . But thefe good
me that be fo xealous of it,forge to thelelucs a miracle,which being
taken away,God himfelfe vanillieth with his power. I dclne to haue
the readers once againe warned , that they diligently wey what our
dodrinc bringeth,whether it hang vpon common fenfcjor with the
wings of Faith, furmounting the world,climbeth vp beyondc it into
the heauens. We fay that Chrift as well with the outwardc fignq:
as with his Spiritc,defcendeth to vsj that he may truly quicken our
foules with the fubftancc of his flefh and of his blood. In thefe few?
words he that perceiueth not to be cotained many miracles,is more
chan fenfelefle.-forafmuch as there is nothinge more befidc naturcj,
than that fouhs fhoulde borrowe fpirituall and heauenly life,of the
flefh which tooke her beginning of the carth,and which was fubie^ft
to death. Nothinge is more incredible,than that thinges diiiant an4
a funder by the whole fpacc of heauen and earth , (hould in fo greac
pittance of places not only be conioyncd, but alfo vnitcd,t:hat foules
may receiue foode of the fiefh of Chrift. Therefore let waiward men
ceaflc to procure haired to vs by a filrhy fclaunder , as though we di4
cnuioufly reftraine any thing of the immeaforable power of God.For
they do cither to foohflily erre or to malicioufly lie.For it is not here ^
in qucftjon what God could, bat what he would. We afFirrpey to be '^'^' *'
done which pleafed him. But it pleafcd him,y Chrift iTiould be made
like to his brethren in ail things,ctcept (inne.What mancr of thing i$
our flcrtiPis it not fuch as confiftcth of the ccrtaine meafure of it.as is ^
fpntaincd in pUf ?, as is toychc^* as is fcene? And why(fay thcy)niay
DPDD ijij
Cap.iy. Of the outward nieanes
not God makcjthat one fel/e fame ftcfti may occupy many & diuerfc
places,may be concamed in one place, may be without meafure and
forme?Thou madde man,why rec^uircft thou of the powei" of God, to
make fle(h at one felfe time to be and not to be ftcfh ? Like as if thou
Ihouldeft inft<mtly require him to make at one felfe time the light to
be both light and dai keneffe. But he willcth light to be light, darkc-
neffe to be darkcnelfc , fle(he to be flcflie. He (hall in deede when ic
pleafeth him , turne darkeneflc into light , and light into darkeneffe:
but when thou required that hght and darkencs may not djffer,what
doeft thou elfc butpcrucrt the4>iderof the wifdom of God? There-
fore flelhe muft be ftelhe : and Spirit, Spjritrcucry thinge in fuch law
and condition as God hath created It. But fuch is the condition of
flefhe , that it muft be in one yea and that a ccrtainc placCjand con-
(ift of her meafure and of her forme. With this condition Chnft tokc
i'Sd flellie vpon him,to which(as Auguftine witne{reth)he hath giucn in
rda. Jeedc vncorruption and glory, but he hath not taken from it nature
and trueth.
2 $ They aunfwere,that they haue the worde, whereby the will of
God is made plaine : namely ii it be graunted ihem to banifhe out of
the Church the gift of cxpofJtio, which may bring light to the word»
I graunt that they haue the worde : but fuch as in olde time the An-
thropomorphites had, when they made God hauinge a body:fuch as
Marcion & the Manichces had,when they fained the body of Chrift
to be cither heaucly or fantaftical. For they allcaged for teftimonies.
Cor. The firit Adam was of the earih,carthly:the fecond Adam is of hca-
4^' ucn,hcauenly. Againc, Chnft abaced himfelfe,taking vpon him the
"• ^'7 forme of a feruant,and was founde in likcnes as a man.But the groflc
eaters thinke that there is no power 6fGod,vnle(rc with iht monftcr
forged in their braines the whole order of nature be ouerthrowen:
which is rather to limit God , when we couet with our fained inuen-
tions to proue what he C4 do For out of what word haue they taken,
that the body ot- Chrift is vifiblc m hcauen , but lurketh inuifible in
earth vndcr innumerable htle peccs of bread f'They will fay thatne-
ceflity requireth this 5 that the body of Chrift ftiould be giuen in the
Supper. Venly becaufe it pleafed them to gather a fleOily eatinge out
of y words of Chrift;they being caned away by their own foreiudge-
mcntjwere driuen to neceflity to come this futtelty,\vhich the whole
Scripture crieth out againft.But that any thing is by vs diminilhcd of
the power ot God,is fc» falfc,y by our do<^^rjnc the praife of it is very
honorably fctte out. But forafmuch as they alway accufe vs, that we
defiraude God of his honor , when we refufe that which accordinge
to
To Saliiation. Lib4. 581
Co como fcnfe is hard to be bcleucd,alchough it hauc bine promiicd
by the mouth of Chrift: I make againe the fame aunfwcre that I
made eucn nowe,thac in the miftcries of faith we do not af kc coun-
fell of common fenfe, but with quicc wiilingncflc toicarnCjand with
the Spirit of mekcnelfe which lames commcndeth , we receiue the I^ni.x,
dodrmc come from hcauen.But in that when they pernicioufly crre, ^**
I deny not that wefollowe a profitable modcration.Thcy hearing the
wordcs of ChuiijThis is my body,imagine a miracle moii farrc from
his tnindc. But when out of this fained inucntionarifefowlcabfur-
ditics, becaufe they haue already with hedlong haft put fnares vpon
thcmfelues , they plunge thcmfelucs mto the bottomlcfl'c depthc of
the almightintife of God,that by this meanc they may quenche the
Jii;ht of truth. Hereupon commcth that proude precifencfteiWe wiU
not know howe Chrift heth hiddc «nder the bred,holding our fclucs
coiirented with this faying of his, This is my body. But we,as wc do
in the whole Scripture , do with no lefle obedience than care , ftudy
to obreine a founde ynderftandin'^; of this place : neither do wc with
prepofttious heate raftily and without choife catch holdc of that
which Hift tbruftech it felfe into our mindesrbut vfing diUaent mufing
vpo ir,we embrace the meaning which the Spirit of God miniftreth:
and ftanding therupon we do from aloftc delpife whatfoeuer earthly
wifdome is fct againft it. Yea we holde our mindes captmc,that they
may not be bolde fo much as with one htle wordc to carpc againft it:
and do humble them, that they may not dare to rife vp againft it.
Hereupon fprong vp the expolition of the wordes of Chrift, which
to be by the continuall vfagc of the Scripture common to all Sacra-
ments,all they that hauc bene though but meanly excrcifed therein,
do knowe. Neither do we, after the cxaplc of the holy virgin, thinkc **
it la wefuU for vs,in a hard matter to enquire howe it may be done.
26 But becaufe nothing fhall more auailc to confirmcthe faith
of the godly , than when they hauc learned that the dodrinc which
we haue taughtjis taken out of the word of God, and ftandcth vpon
the authoritic thereof: I will make this alfoeuidcnt with as great
brcfcnes as I can.The body of Chrift,(ins the time that it rofe againe,
not Ariftotle but the Holy Gholt teacheth to be limited , and that it
iscompichendedin licauen vntill thclaft day.Ncitheramlif^noratc
that they boldly mockc out thofe places that arc alleged for this pur-
pofe. So oft as Chrift faith that he will dcparte , leauing the world, ioh«i4,
they aunfwcre that ttiat departing is nothing els but a changing of 22. an<i
mortail ftare. But after this mancr , Chnft {hould not fct the Holy *^«
Ghoft in his place to fupplic (as they call it) the wance of his abfcnce:
Cap.i 7. Of the outwarde mcancs
foralmuch as he doth not fuccede into his place, nor Chrift hinfclfe
doth defcendc againc outof the hcaucnly glorie to take vppon hirti
the ftate of mortall hfe.Truely the comming of the Holy Gholl,and
the afcending of Chrift are things fct as contrarie : therefore it can
not be that Chrift (hould accordinge to the fleftie dwell with vs after
the fame mancr that he fendeth his Spirit. Moreouer he in plainc
wordcs exprcflcth , that he will not be alway with his difciples in the
1*^** world. This faying alfo they thinke that they do gaily wipe away, as
though Chrift faid that he will not alway be poore and mifcrable or
fubicd to the ncceffities of this fraile life.But the circumftace of the
place crieth plainely to the contrarie, becaufe there is not entreated
of pouertie and neede,or of the miferabJe ftate of earthly life^but of
worftiip and honor. The anointing pleafed not the difciples,becaufe
they thought it to be a fupcrfluojjs and vnprofitable coft , and nerc
vnto riotous exceffe,therefore they had rather that the price thereof
which they thought to be il wafted , had bene beftowed vppon the
poore. Chrift aunfwereth that he ftiall not alway be prefent , that he
ac.in may be worfhipped with fuch honor. And none otherwifc did Aii-
h.50. guftine expounde it,whoes wordcs be thefe which arc nothing dout-
full. When Chrift faid, Ye ftiall not alway haue me, he fpakc of the
prefence of his body. For according to his maieftie, according to his
prouidence,according to his vnfpeakable and inuifible grace, this was
it.a8. fulfilled which he faid,Behold , I am with you euen to the ending of
*' the world.But according to the fleftie which the word tokc vn to him,
according to this that he was borne of the Virgin , according to this
that he was take of the Iewes,that he was faftencd to the tree, that
he was taken downc from the croflc, that he was wrapped in linncn
dotheSjthat he was laycd in the grauc,that he was manifcftly (hewed
in the refurred:ion,this was fulfilled,Ye fhal not alway haue me with
you.Why fo? Becaufe he was conuerfante according to the prefence
of his bodie fortie dayes with his difciples , and while they accom*
panied him in feing not in following , he afcendcd. He is not here:
for he (itteth there at the right hande of the Father . And yet he is
hcre:becaufe he is not gone away in prefence of maieftie.Otherwifc
according to the prefence of maiefty we haue Chnft alway: and ac-»
cording to the prefence of the flefti it is rightly faid , But me ye ftiall
not alway haue. For according to the prefence of the fle{hc,thc
Church had him a fewe dayes : nowe ftie holdeth him by faith , but
fecth him not with cies. Where(that 1 may note this alfo brefely)he
maketh him prefente to vs three wayes,by maieftie,prouidcnce,and
vnfpeakable grace, vnder which I comprehende this maruelous com-i
mui^ioi^
To Saluation. Lib.4. 582
rnunion of his body and blood : if fo that wc vndcrftandc it to be
done bv the power of the Holy Ghoft , not by that famed cnclolmg
of his body vnder the element. For our Lordc hath tcftificd, that he
liathflcrtie and bones which may be felt and fenc. And to Go away
and Afcende do not fignihc to make a fhewe of one afccnding and
going away,but to do mdeede that which the wordcsfounde. Shall
we then (will fomc man fay) alligne to Chrilt (ome certaiiie coaft of
heaucn ? But I aunfvverc with Auguftme, that this is a molt curious Lib. <!e
and fuperftuous queftion,tf fo that yet wc beleue that he is in heaue. ^'^'^ *
27 But what doth the name of afcendmg fo oft repeted : doth it '^^ ^^
not (ignific a remoumg from one place to an other ? They derrie it:
bccauie after their opinion , by hcighth is onely (ignificd maicfticof
Empire. But v/hat meancth the very maner of alcending? was he not,
in (ighiof hisdifcipleslokingon,hfced vponhy ?Donotthc Euan- ^^t,9
geliltcs plainly deciare,rhat he was taken vp into the beauens?Thefc "~:
witty Sophiftcrs do aunfwere , that wnh a cloude fet betwcenc him Luc.al*
and chcm,hc was conucyed out of their fight,that the faithfull might 51.
Icarnc that from thenfc fourth he fhould not be vilible m the world.
As though , to make credit of his inuilible prefencc , he ought not
rather to vanifhc away in a moment : or as though the cloude ou^ht
not rather to compaflc him before that he ftirred his foote.But when
he is carried vp on hy into the airc,and with a cloude caft vndernctli
him,teacheth that he is no m'>re to be fought in eaith: we fafcly ga-
ther, that nowe he hath hii dwelling place in the hcauens : as Paulc Phil.},
alfo a0irmeth,and from tbcnfc biddcth vs to loke for him. After this ***•
maner the Angels warned the difciples , that they in vaine gazed vp
into bcauen : bccaufc lefus which is taken vp into hcauen , fhall (b
come as they haue fene him go vp.Herc alfo the aduerfaries of foundc
dodrinc ftarte away with a plcafantc (hifteasthcy thinkc, faying
that he lliall then come vifible , which ncuer wcnte out of the earth
but that he abid*v:th inuifiblc with them that be his. As though the
An^ells did there fignifie a double prefence.and do not fimply make
the difciples witnc0cs of bis going vp feing it with their eycs,that no
douting might remaine : euen as if they had faid : he in your lightcs
beholdinjx ic , being taken vp into heauen, hath claimed to himfelfc
the heaucnly Empire : it remaineth that ye paciently abide in expec-
tation,till he come againe the iudgc of the world:bccaufe he is nowe
cntred into heauen , not that he may alone poflefle it , but that he
may gather together with him you and all the godly.
28 But forafmuch as the defenders of this bailarde dodrinc are
not alliamed co garniflie it with the confenting voices of the olde
Cap. 1 7. Of the outwardc mcancs
writers and fpccially of Auguftine: I will in fcwe wordes declare
howe pcruerfly they go about it.For whereas their teftimonics hauc
bene gathered together of learned & godly me, I will noc do a thing
already done : let him that will.fcke them out of their workes. I wiU
not heapc together ,neithcr out of Auguftine himfelfe,all that might
make to the purpofe : but will be contente to fhewe by a fewe that
he is without coniroucrfic whole on our fide. As for this that our
Ad Bo- aduerfaries, to writhe him from vs, do allege that it is commonly red
nifac. in his bookes , that the fleflic and blood of Chrift is diftributed in
Epilt the Supper , namely the Sacrifice ones offred in the croflc : it is but
»5» trifling: fith he alfo calleth it cither Thankefgeuingjor the Sacramet
of the body.But in whatfenfc he vfeth the words of flelhe & blood,
wc ncede not to fekc with long compaffing about : forafmuch as he
declarethhimfelfe 3 faying that Sacraments take their names of the
hkeneflc of the things which they fignifie : and that therefore after a
fld°"a! ^"^^^'^ maner y Sacramet of the body is the body. Wherwith accor-
Manic. ^^^^ ^^ Other place which is wel enough knowen :The Lord fticked
lib.ii. not to faVjThis is my body,whenhegauethefigneofit.Againerhcy
obied, that Auguftine writeth exprefly, that y body of Chrift falleth
to the grounde,and entreth into the mouthreuen in the fame fenfe,
that be affirmcth it to be confumed , becaufe he ioineth them both
^ • together. Neither doth that make to the contrarie, which he faith,
Libr.5. fj^ jj when the mifterie is ended the bred is confumed : becaufe he
cap 10.* ^^^ * ^''■^^ before faid:fith thcfe things are knowc to men, forafmuch
as they are done by men, they may haue honor as things : but as
maruelous things,they may not. And to no other ende tendeth that
which our aducrfaries do to vnaduifedly drawe to themfelues : that
Chrift did (after a certainc maner) beare himfelfe in his owne hadej>
when he reached y mifticall bred to the difciples.For by enterlacing
this aduerbe of liknefle (after a certain maner) he fufficiently decla-
reth, that he was not truely nor really enclofcd vnder the bred. And
InPfal. nomaruell; fith in an other place he plainly affirmeth that bodies,
35* if fpaces of places be taken from them j {halbc no where :and be-
caufe they fhalbe no where , they {hall not beatall.lt is a hungry
cauillation ,to fay that in that place is not entreated of the Supper,
in wtch God vtterethfpeciall power : becaufe the queftio wa^lnoued
concerning thefleftie of Chrift, and the holy manof fct purpofe
aunfwering faith: Chrift gaue immortalitie to his flcilic , but toke
Epi.ad. not nature from it. After this forme it is not to be thought that he
Darda. is eche where fpred abrode : for we muft beware that wc do not fo
affirmc the Godhed of the man,that we take away the irueth of the
body*
To Saluation. Lib.4. 583
body. And it followcth not, that that which is in God mufl be cchc
where as God is. There is a rcafon by and by added : for one perlbn
is God and man , and both are one Chrift : cchc whef;p,by this that
he is God : in hcauen,by this that he is raan.What a negligence had
it bene , not to cxcepte the mifterie of the Supper being a thing fo
carneft and weighty , if there had bene in it any thingc againft the
dodrinc which he entreated of. And yet if a mannc do hecdcfully
read that which followeth within a htle after , he fliall findc that
vnder that gcnerall dodrine, the Supper is alfo comprchcnded,that
Chrift the onely begotten Sonne of God, and the fame the fonne of
man, is echc where whole prefcnt as God : that he is in the temple
of God (that is in the Church)God as it were there dvveUing,and in
fomc certaine place of heauen by reafon of the meafurc of his true
body. We fee howc , to the vniting of Chrift with che Church , he
doth not drawe his body out of heaucn:which furcly he would haue
done,if the body of Chrift were not truely meate to vs vnleflc it were
cnclofed vnder bred. In an other place defining howe the faithfull
do now poflefl'e Chrift, Thou haft him (faith he) by the figne of the Traft.l
crofle, by the Sacrament of Baptifmc, by themcatcanddrinkeof in loh
the altar. Howe rightly he rcckcncth a fuperftitious vfage among
the Signcs of the prefence of Chrift , I do not nowe difpute ; but he
that comparcth the prefence of the fleflic to the figne of the crofle,
fufficicntly fhcweth that he faineth not a two bodied Chrift, that
the fame he may lurke hidden vnder the brcd,which fittcth vifible in
heauen. If this necde plainer declaration , it is by and by after added Mat. ai
in the fame place , that according to the prefence of maieftic , we "•
alway haue Chrift ; that according to the prefence of the flefhe, it is
rightly fayedjMc ye ftiall not alway haue.They aunfwcre,that this is Mat.il
alio added, that according to an vnfpcakable and inuifiblc grace, it is *®'
fulfilled which is faid of him,I am with you, euen vnto the ending of
the world. But that is nothing for their auamage : bccaufe this is at
length reftraincd to hismaiefty,whichis euer in coparifon fet againft
the body> and his ftertie by exprcfie name is made different from his
grace and power. As in an other place the fame comparifon of con*
traries is red in him,that Chrift by bodily prefence left the difciples,
that by fpirituall prefence he may be ftill with them: where it is plainc
that the fubftance of the flefhe is diftinguiftied from the power of
the SpiriCjwhich conioineth vs with Chrift, though wc be otherwifc
farre fcuered by diftancc of places. The fame mancr of fpeakinghc
oftentimes vfcth , as when he fmth : He is to come againc to the
quiciccand the dead widi bodily prefence , according to the rule of
Cap. 1 7. Of the outwarde mcanes
Faith and (biinde dodrinc.For with fpintuall prefence he was alfoto
come to them, and to abide with the whole Church in the world
vntill the ending of the woe Id.Thcrforc this fpcche is direded to the
beleuers , whom he had already begorrne to faue wich bodily prc-
fcncc, and whom he was to Icauc with bodily abience:that he might
with his Father fauc them with fpintuall prcfcnce. To take bodily
for vifiblc is but tufling : fith he (etteth alfo the body in compaiifon
againftthc dmine power : and adding ( to faue v/ith the Father) he
clearcly exprefleth that he doth poure abrode his grace from heaucn
to vs by his Spirit.
29 And fiththey putfo much confidence in this lurking hole
of inuifibic prcfcnce,go to,let vs fee howe well they hide themltlucs
in it.Firft they lliall not bring fourth one fyilable out of the Scriptures,
whereby they may proue that Chrifl is inuifible: but they take th^t
for confcfled which no man that hath his founds wittwili graunc
lhcm,that the body of Chrift can not othcrwife be geucn in the Sup^
per but being couered with the vifor of bred , And this is the very
pointc about which they ftriue with vs , fo farre is it of from hauing
the place of a principle. And when they fo babblc.they are copellcd
to make a double body of Chrift : becaufe after their opinion, it is in
it fclfe vifiblc in heajen,butinuifibjc in the Supper afttr a Ipeciall
mancr of difpenfation.But howe trimly this agree th,it is eafy to iudgc
AOt. ^ both by oiher places of ScripturCjand by the witneHe of Petcr.Peter
**• faith that Chrift muft be holden or contcincd in heausnjtiJl he come
againe.Thefr menteache that he is eucry whcre,but wiihout forme.
They take exception and fay that it is vniuft dcahngjto make the
nature of a glorified body fubied to the lawes of common nature.
But this aunfvvcre draweih with it that doting error of Seruettus,
{which is worthily to be abhorred of all the godly) that the body
was fwallowed vpof the Godhed. 1 do not fay that they ihinkc fo.
But if this be reckened among the quahtics of a glorified body, to fi?l
all things after an inuifible mancr , it is euident that the bodily fub-
ftancc is deftroyed,and that there is left no difference of the godhed
and the nature of man.Againeif the body of Chrift be fo of many
faftiions and diucrfe , that it is fcnc in one place , and is inuifible in
another: where is the very nature of a body which confifteth of his
nicafured proportions ? and where is the vnitie ? Much more rightly
doth Tertullian fay , which affirmeth that the body of Chrift was a
true and naturall body , becaufe in the myfterie of the Supper the
figure of it is fet before vs for a pledge and affuranceof the fpintuall
luc 24 J»^c.And vcnly Chiift faid of his glorified body, fee and fele , for a
3».' * Spiric
To Saluation. Lib,4. 5S4
spirit hath not Bedic and bones.Lo by Chrifts owne mouth the truth
of his fleflic is proued , bccaufc it can be felt and fcnc. Takeaway
thefc things , than it (hall cefTe to be fleftic . They ftill flee to their
dennc of difpenlation which they haue fratncd to themfducs. But it
is our part fo to embrace that which Chrift abfoluccly pronounceth,
that that which he mcancth to affirme may be of force with vs with
out exception. Heproueth himfelte tobcnoghoft, becaufcheis
vifible in his flclhc . Let that be taken away which he claimeth as
proprc to the nature of his body:muft they not then be faine to
come a ncwc definiti5 of a body? Nowc whether focuer they turnc
thefelues about , their faincd difpenfation hath n^ place in that place
of Paul where he faithjthatvve loke for a Sauior from heauen, which Phil.|,
fliall tafhion our bafe body like to his glorious body . For we may **•
not hope for a like fafhioning in thofe qualities which they faine to
Chrift, that cucry one {hould haue an inuifible and vnmeafurablc
body. Neither (hall there be founde any man fo dull wicted whom
they may make to beleue fo great an ablurdity. Let them not there-
fore afcribe this gift to Chrifts glorified body , to be at ones in many
places,and to be conteined in no fpace. Finally let them either opcly
deny the refurredion of the flefhe , or let them graunt that Chrift
beingc clothed with heaucnly glory , did not put of his flelhe , who
(hall make vs in our fleihe fcllowes and parteners of the fame glory,
when we {hall haue the refurredion common with him. For, what
doth the Scripture teache more plainely , than that as Chrift did put
on our true flefhe when he was borne of the Virgin , and fuffrcd in
our true flefhe when he fatisHcd for vs : fo he receiued againe alfo
the fame true ftefhc in rifing againe , and caried it vp to heauen. For
this IS to vs the hope of our refurredion and afccnding into heauen,
that Chnfl is rifen againe and afcended : and ( as Tertullian faith )
he carried the earneft of our refurredion into the heauens with him,
Nowc howe wcake and fraile (hould that hope be , vnlefTc this our
fclfe flcfhhad beneraifed vp with Chrift & entred into the kingdomc
of heauen? But this is the propre trueth of a body, to be conteined
in fpace , to conGft of his meafurcd proportions > to haue his forme.
Therefore away with this folifli deuife , which doth faftcn both the
mindcs of men and Chrift to the bred. For to what purpofc ferueth
thefecret prefence vndcr bred, but that they which couettohauc
Chrift ioined with them, may reft in that (igne ? But the Lordc him- loh. jq
fclfe willed vs to withdrawe notonelyour eyes but all ourfenfes »7.
from the earth , forbidding himfelfe to be touched of the women
vntili he had gone vp to his Father. When he fcech Maiie with godly
Cap.i 7. Of the outwarde meanes
%dc of rcucrcce to make haft to kific his fete , there is no caufe vfhy
he fliould difalovve and forbid this couching till he haue bene taken
vp into heaucn,but becaufe he will be fought no where els. Whereas
Aft. 7. they obied that he was afterwarde fene of Stephen , the folutionis
5^' cafy.For neither was it therefore nccclfary that Chnit fliould change
placCjwhich could geuc ro the eyes of his feruant fuch fliarpnedc of
fight as might pcr.rce through the heaucns. The fame alio is to be
Aft. 9.4 faid of Paule. Whereas they obied that Chrift came out of the Se-
Wac. z8 puichre being fliut : &entred in among 'chedifciplcsjthed ores being
loh 20 ^"^ ■ ^^^^^ makeih ncuer a whit more for maintenance of their error.
,^ ' For as the water liWe a faft pauement made a way to Chrift walking
Wat 14. vpon the lake : fo it is no maruelljif at his comming the hardnefle of
^5« the ftonc yelded it felfe. Howbeit it is more prouabk , that by his
commaundcment the ftone was remoued , and by and by after paf-
fage giuen him returned into his place. And to enterjthe dores being
lliut, IS not almuch in cfFed as to pearce through the whole fubftace,
but by diuine power to open an entrie for himfelfe , that he fodenly
ftode among the difciples, verily after a niaruclous mancr,whcn the
i'«c«24. dores were faft locked. That which they allege out of Luke , that
' ' Chrift fodenly vaniftied away from the eyes of the difciples with
whom he went to Emaus.profiteth them nothingjand maketh for vs.
For,that he might take away the fight of himfelfe from themjhe was
not made inuifible, but oncly went out of fight. As when he went in
luc.a4. iourney together with them ( as the fame Luke witneflcth) he did
*^* not put on 3 newe face,that he mightnot be knowen,but htldc their
eyes.But thefc fcllowes do not onely transforme Chrift,that he may
be conuerfant in earth , but in diuerfe places they make him diuerfc
and vnlike himfelfe. Finally in fo trifling they do,not by one word in
deede , but by a circumehnce , make of the fleflie of Chrift a Spirit:
andnot contented therewith , they put vpon it altogether contraiic
<jualities.Whereupon of neceffitie foUoweth that it is double.
JO Nowc although we graunt them that which they prate of the
jnuifible prefence,y vnmeafurabienes fhal not be yet proued,withouc
which they ftiall in vainc attempt to enclofe Chrift vnder bred. Vn-
lefte the body of Chrift may be euery where at ones , without any
compafle of place.itfhall not be likrlythache lie'-h hidden vnder
bred in the Supper. By which nccefTitre they brought in the mon-
flruous being euery where. But it is fhev/ed by ftrong and plaine wit-
neflcs of Scripture , that it was limited about by the meafure of the
body of a mantand then that by his i^fceding he hath made it plaine
that he is not in all places ^ but that when he paiTeth into one place,
he
To Saluation. Lib.4. 585
— ^Icancth the other that he was in before Neither is the promifc which
they allege , to be drawe to the body, I am with you cuen to th c en- ^^^
ding of the world. Firft the concinuali conjoining can not ftinde, ^^
vnleflc Chrift dwell m vs corporally without the v(c of the Supper.
Therefore there is no luft caufc why they {l->ould fo rtiarply bravvic
about the wordcs of Chrift , that they may in the Supper cnclofc
Chrift rndcr bred. Againc the text it fclfe proucth, that Chrift fpca-
keth nothing lefTc than of his ficftie , but promifeth to his difciples
inuinciblc hclpc,whcrcby he may defendc and fufic-inc them againft
all the affaultes of Satan and the world.For when he enioined them
a hard charge ; Icaft they ftiould dout to take it in hande , or fhould
fearefully execute it, he ftregthencth them with affiance of his pre
fence : as if he had faid , that his fuccor fhall not fr.ile them , which
ihalbe impoftiblc to be ouercomc. Vnlcfle they hfted to confoundc
all things , ought they not to haue made diftiii^ion of the mancr of
prcfcnce. And verily fomc had rather with great (hame to vtter their
ii;norancc,than toyeldc neuer (o litlcof their error. I fprake not of
the Papiftes : whocs do^rine is more tolerable , or at the icaft more
ihamcfaft.But cotentioufnes fo carricth forae away, that they fay that
by reafon of the natures vnited in Chrift , whcrefocucr the Godhed
of Chrift is.ihere is alfo his fleftie, which can not be feuered from his
Godhed. As though that famevniting haue compounded of thofc
' two natures I wote notwhat mean thing which was neither God nor
nian.So in decde did Eutiches,and after him Scruettus.But it is plain-
ly garhcrcd out of the Scripture,that the oncly one pcrfon of Chrift
doth fo confift of two natures , that cither of them hath ftill her
owne propertic remaining fafc. And that Eutichcs was rightfully
condemned , they will be afhamed to deny : it is marucll that they
inarkc not the caufc of his condemning , that takin^; away the diffe-
rence betwene the natures, enforcing the vnuie ot perfon, he made
of God man,and of man God. What madneffe therefore is it, rather
to mingle hcauenandcarth together, than not to drawe the body
of Chrift out of the heauenly Sanftuaric ? For whereas they bring
for thcmfelues thefc tcftimonies , None is gone vp tohcaucn but
he that is come down, the Sonne of man which is in hcauen. Againc, lo^o.j
The fbnne which is in the bofomcof the Father , he fhall declare !',
" them : it is a point of like fenflefTc dullncffe , to dcfpife the commu- jg
nicating of properties which was in oldc time not without caufe in-
uented of the holy Fathers. Trueiy, when the Lorde of glory is faid
to be crucificd,Paulc doth not mesne that he fuftrcd any thing in his i.Cor*
Godhed: but becaufcthc fame Chnfi which being anabicd and *•'•
u. , £EEB
Cap.i 7- Of the outwarde mcancs
defpifcd in thcflefhe did fuffer , was both God and Lordc of glory,'
After this mancr alfo the Sonne of man was in hcauen : becaufc the
iclfc fame Chrift , which according to the flcllic did dwell the Sonne
of man in earth, was God in hcauen. In which forte he is (aid to
haue defcended from the faid place accordmg to his Godhed :noc
that the Godhed did forfake hcauen, to hide it felfc in the prifon of
the body : but becaufc » although it filled all things , yet in the very
manhodeof Chnftit dwelled corporally.that is to fay naturally and
after a certaine vnfpeakable maner. It is a common didmdion la
fchole? , which lam not artiamed toreherfezthat although whole
Chrift be euery where, yet not the whole that is in him is eucry
where. And I woulde to God the Scholcmen themfelues had well
weyed the pith of this faying : for fo fhould the vnfauorie inuention
of the fltrlWy prefence of Chrift haue bine met withalLTherfore our
nrtediacor>fich he is whole euery where,is ilway at handc with his, 8c
in the Supper after a fpcciall maner gcucth himfelfe prefent ; but yet
fo, that whole he is prefent,not the whole that he is : becaufe, as it is
faid^in his Beiliche is coteincd in heauen till he appeare to iudgcmet.
^i But they arcfarre deceiued ,whichconceiue no presence of
the fleflie of Chrift in the Supper, vnleffc it be made prefent in bread*
For fo they leauc nothing to the fccret working of the Spirit , which
vniceth Chrift himfelfe vntovs. They thinkc not Chrift prefent,
vnleffe he come downe to vs. As though if he did lift v$ vp to him,
we ftiouldnoc afwell enioy his prefence. Therefore the queftionis
onely ofrhc maner : becaufe they place Chrift in the bread , but wc
thinke it not lawfull for vs to pluck him out of hcauc.Let the readers
iudge whethef is the rightcr.Oncly let this cauillatio be driuen away*
that Chrift is taken away from his Suppcr,vnieflc he be hidden vndcr
the c cuer of brcad.For fich this mifterie is hcauerily, it is no neede to
drawc Chrift into the earth,that he may be ioined to vs.
5z Nowe if any man doafke me of the mancr,I will not beafha-
mcd to confeiTfjthat it is a hrer fecret than that it can be cither com-
prehended with my wict, or vtrered with my wordes : and , to fpeakc
it more plainly ,1 rather fcJeitjthan I can vnderftand it. Therefore
I do herein without cocrouerfic embrace the trath of God, in which
I may fafely reft. He pronounceth that his fleftie is the meateof my
foule, and his blood is ibc drinke. With fuch foode I offre my foulc
to him to be feddc. In his holy Supper he commaundcth me vndcr
the Fg'ies of breadanJ wine to take, eare, and dnnke his body and
blood. I nothing dout that both he doth trucly deliuer them , and
X do rccciue them. Oaely I rcfttfe the abfuidiues ^ which appeare to
be
To Saluation. Lib.4. 58^
ht f hhcr vnworthy of the hcaucnlv maieftic of Chrift,or difagreing
from the truth ot his nature ot mnnhoJettorarmuch 3J they muft alfo
fight with the word of Godj which allotcacheth that Chiiftwas Luc.j-^
fo taken vpinro thcgloric of the heauenly kingdome thatithfterh i6.
him v^ aboue all eitatc of the world , and no IclTc diligcndy fctteth
forth in his nature of mnn, rhofn* thmgs that arc proprcly belonging
to his rrue mnn' .ode. Neither ought this to fccme incredible , or not
confonant to rcalon: becaule as the whole kingdome of Chnft is
fpnituali , fo whatfoeucr he doth with his Church , ought not to be
reduced to the rcafon of this world. Of,ihatT may vfe the wordes of
Augurtine,rhis miftene, as otlicr are, is done by men, but from God:
in earth , but from heaucn. Such (I fay) is the prcfcnce of the body, , ^ |
as the nature of the iJacramecrcciuireth: which we fay heretocxccll ^.ca.^^
with fo ^'^rcatforccand lo great efFeftualnefle,thatfi not onely brin-
gcth to our mindes vndoutcd truft of eternall life , but alfo alfurcth
vs oF the immortalicic of ou. flellie. For it is nowe quickened of his
immorcall flv llie , and after a certainc mancr communicatcth of his
immortalitie.Thcy which arc carfcd aboue this v/ith iheir excciTiuc
fpeachesdo nothing but with luch cntan^,lcments darken the fimplc
and plainc truth. Jf any be not yet fatisfied,! would haue him here a
while to confidcr with me , thn we nowe fpeake of a Sacrament , all
ihepartcs whereof ought to be referred to faith. But we do no lefTc
deintily and plentifully feede faith with this part.:king of the body
which we hauc declared , than they tliai piu; kc Chnft hia^feife out
of heauen. In the mcanetime I pl.iinly confefTe , thst 1 refufethat
miTtnreoftheflcl'hcof Chnft with our foule, or the pouring out of
itfuch as they teache : bccaulc it luftifeth vs , that C hnft doth out of
the fubftance of hi*: flcfn brcatii life into our foulos, yea do:h poure
intovs his ownc life, although the very flefhe of (Thrift doth not
cntrc into vs. Morcoucr it i^ino dout that the proportion of faith,
whereby Paul willetb vs to examine all cxpofition of Scripturc,doth Rom.i
in this bchalfc very well agrcwith mc. As for them that fpeakc ?•
againft fo euideni a tri>th,lct them looke after what rule of faith they
failiion themfclues. He that doih not confcflc that IcfusChriftis **
come m the flelhc,is not of God.Thcfc men, although they clokc it,
ormarke itnot,do fpoilchim ofhisflefhe.
55 Of communicating is to be likcwifc thought , which they
acknowledge nonejVnlcfTe they deuoure ihcflelhc of Chrift vndcr
bread. But there is no fmall wron^ done to the Holy G'noft , vnlefTc
we bcleue that it is brought to pit(^c by his incomprehenfiblc power,
that we communicate with the fleihe and blood o f Ch ri ft.Yea if the
££££ ij
Cap. 1 7. Of the outwardc mcancs
force of the miftcrie, fuch as it is taught of v$, and as it was knowetl
to the oldc Church from fower hundred yeres ago , were wcycd ac-
cording CO the worthineffc of it^thcrc was enough and more where-
vpon we might be fatisfied.the gate had bine fhut againft many fowie
errors , out of which hauc bene kindled many horrible diflfcnfiohs
wherewith both in olde time and in our age the Church hath bene
miferably vexed* while curious men do enforce an excefliue maner
of prefence, which the Scripture neuer (heweth. And they turmoile
about a thing fondly and raihely conceiued , as if the enclofing of
Chnft vnder bread were (as the proucrbe is) the prowe and poupe
of godlinefle. It principally behoued to knowe , howe the body of
Chrift J as it was ones deliuercd for vs , is made ours : howe we arc
made partakers of his bloody was (hedde : becaufe this is to poffefle
whole Chrift crucifiedjthat we may enioy all his good things. Nowc
theCe thingSjin which was fo great importaccibeing omitted yea nc-
gleifled and in a mancr buried , this onely crabbed qucftibn pleafeth
them;howc the body of Chrift lieth hidde vnder bread or vnder the
forme of bread.Tbey falfly fpread abrode that whatfoeuer we teache
concerning fpirituall eating, is contrarie to the true and reall eating,
as they call it : becaufe we haue refped to nothing but to the mancr,
which among them is carnall , while they enclofe Chrift in bread:
but toys it is fpirituall, becaufe the fecret power of the Spirit is the
bondc of our coioining with Chrift.No truer is that other obiedion,
that we touche onely the frute or effed which the faithfull take of
the eating of the flcflic of Chrift.For we haue faid before,that Chrift
himfelfe is the fubftance of the Supper rand that thereupon fol-
loweth the efted > that by the facrifice of bis death we are cleanfe4
from iinnes , by his blood we are waftied, by his rcfurredion we are
raifed vp into hope of the hcauenly life . But the foolifhe imagina-
tion,whcrof Lombarde was the authorjhath peruerted their mindes,
while they thinke that the eating of the fkfhe of Chrift is the Sacra-
ment. For thus faith he: The Sacrament and not the thing are the
• formes of bread and wineithe Sacrament and the thing^rc the flcfhc
, and blood of Chrift : the thing and not the Sacrament ,1$ his mifti-
callflefhe. Againe within a littell after. The thing fignified and con-
teinedjis the propre flefhc of Chrift : the thing fignificd and not con-
teined is his mifticallbody. Whereas he maketh difference betwenc
thefleHie of Chrift, and the effeduall power of norifhing.wbere with
it is endued , I agree •• but whereas he faineth it to be a Sacrament,
yea and contcincd vnder bread,it is an error not to be fuffred. Here-
vpon hach growcn the falfc expoiicion of facramencaU eating , be-
cause
To Saluation. Lib.4. 587
cairfc rhey hauc thought that wicked men alio and cuell doers do caic
the flcfhe of Chriftjhowc much focucr they be ftrangeis from him.
But the flcftie of Chrift it fclfe in the mifterie of the Supper is no
Icffc a fpirituall thing than cternall faluation.Wherupon we gather,
that whofoeucr be voidcofthc Spirit ofChrift,can nomorceatc
ihcflcfhe of Chrift, than they can drinkc wine wherewith isioincd
no taft.TrucIy Chrift is to hainoufly tornc in fonder,when that dead
fcody and which hath no liuely ftrcngth , is geuen forth in common
to vnbeleuers : and his cxprefle wordes arc diredly againft it,Who loin,
focucr eatith my ftefhc and drinkcth my blood , abideth in me , and 5^*
I in him. They aunfwcrc that in that place is not entreated of the
facram entail eating : which I graunt , fo that they will not nowe and
jhen ftomble againft the fame ftonc , in faying that the flcftie it fdfc
is eaten without fruit. But I would Icnowe of them , howe long they
holdc it when they haue eaten it. Here, in my iudgcment,they {hall
hauc no way to gelt out. But they obicd , that nothing can be with-
drawen or faileof thepromifcs ofGodby the vnthankcfulnefle of
men. I graunt in decde , and I fay that the force of the mifterie rc-
inaineth whole , howefocuer wicked men do, as much as in them
lieth , endeuor to m'akc it voide. Yet it is one thing to be oftred, and
an other thing to be receiued. Chrift reacheth this fpirituall mcate
and offreth this fpirituall drinkc to all men : fome do gredily eate of
it, fomc do lothingly refufe it: {hall thefc men refufmge make the
mcate and the drinkc tolofe their nature ? They will fay thactheic
opinion is holpcn by this fimilitudCjUamely that the ftefhc of Chrift,
though it be vnfauoric , is ncuertheleftc his flefhe. But I denie thac
it can be eaten without the taft of faiihior (if we lift rather to fpcake
as Auguftinc doth)I fay that men bearc away no more of this Sacra-
mentjthan they gather with the vefTcll of faith. So nothing is abated
from the Sacrametjyca the truth and eflfedualncftc therof remaineth
ynminilhed , although the wicked depart emptic from tlic outward
partaking of it. If they againe obied that this word,this is my body,
is diminifhed , if the wicked rcceiuc corruptible bread and nothing
els; we hauc a folution ready, that God will notbcacknowen true
in the rcceiuingic fclfe j but in the ftcdfaftnelfc of his owne good-
neflc,when he is ready to gcuc,yea liberally ofFreth to the vnworthy
that which they rcfufe, And this is the fulnefTc of the Sacrament,
which the whole world can not brcake , that the ftefhc and blood of
Chrift is noleircgcucntothc vnworthy than to the chofcn faithful!
ones of God : but therewithall it is true, that as water lighting vpon
^ hard ftonc , fallcth away , bccaufc there i$ no entrie open into thr*
EEEE iij
Cap. 1 7. Of the outwardc mcancs
ftone : Co the wicked do with their hardncfle driuc backe the grace o£
God that it can not pearcc into them. Moreoucr, ihatChr ift ihould
be rccciued without faith,is no more agreeing with reafonjthan ftedc
to budde in ihc hrc. Whereas they afke , howc Chrift is conie to
damnation to fome , vnleffe they receiue him vnworthily,it is a very
coldequeftion.'forafmuchas weno where reade, chat men do pro-
cure death to themfeJues by vnworthily rccciuing Chrift, but rather
»!at.i 3. by refufing him.Neitijer doth Chriftci parable hcipe them, where he
faith that feede grqwcth vp among tliornes , and afterwarde being
choked is marred :bccaurc he there entreateth, of what value the
faith IS which cndurqth but for a time, which they do not thinke to
be ncccflary to the eating of Chriftes flefh and drinking of his blood,
that in this behalfe do make ludas egally fellowe with Peter.But ra-
ther by the fame parable their error is confuted , wliere Chrift faitlj
that fomc fecde fallcth in the hy way,othcr fome vpon ftoncs , and
neither of them takcch rootc.Whereupon foilov/eth that to the vn^»
f eleuers their owne hardncffe is a let that Chrift atteineth nottp
them.Whofoeuer defireth to haue our filuatipn holpen by this mi-^
fterie,Iliail iindc nothing fitter,thantiiat the faithfull being led to the
very fountjine , iTiould drawc hfe out of the Sonne of God. But the
dignitie of it i^ honorably enou?,h fee out , when wc keepe in minde
that it is a hcIpe whereby we be grafted into the body of Chnft , oc
being gr.itfed cS more & more growc together,all he do fully make
.Cor. himfelf one with vs in the heauenly lifc.They obicd that Paul ought
i.2i>. not to haue made them giltie of the body & blood of Chrift, vnlefTc
they were partakers of thcm.But I aunfwcre that they are not there-
fore codemned.becaufe they haue eaten (hem,hut only hecaufe they
haue prophaned the miftene.in treading vnder feete y pledge of the
holy conjoining with God,which they ought reuercntly to recciuc.
^4 Now becaufe Auguftme among the oldc writers chiefly hath
affirmed that article of dodrine , that nothingjs abated from the Sa-
craments, nor the grace which they figure is made voide by the infi-
dehte or noughtinelTc of men : it ihalbc profitable to proue clearely
by his owne wordes, howe vjifirtly and peruerfly they do drawe that
to this prefent caufe,which caft the body of Chnft to dogges to eatc.
The facrameniall eating, after their opinion, is whereby the wicked
recciuc the body & blood of Chrift without the power of the Spirits
[omil. or any effed of grace. Au^uftine contrariwifc weycng wifely thofc
^J' wordcSjHe that eateth my fleihe,and dnnketh my blood,(haIl not die
ali.tf. ^^^ cuer,rayeth:Namcly the power of the Sacrament, not oneiy the
». viable Sacrament: and verily within , not without : he tliat catcth it
with
ToSaluation. Lib4. 588
with hartc , noc he that prcffcch it with tooch. Whereupon at Icngcli
he condudcth that the facramcnt of this thing,t!iat is to fay, of the
vnicy of the body & blood of Chrift , is fet before men m the Suppec
of the Lordjto fome vnto hfe,to fome vnto dclhudi6:but the thing
itfclfewhercofitisafacrament, to all men vnto life, to none vnto
dcftrudion , whofocucr be pai taker of it. That none fhouldherc
cauill ,that the thing is called noc the body , but the grace of the
Spirit which may be feuered from the body,che contrarie coparifon
bctwenc thcfe two wordes of addition Viliblc and Inuifiblc driucch
away all thcfe miftes : for vnder the firfl: of them can not be compre-
hended the body ofChrilKWherupo foUowcth that the vnbeleuers
do comunicate oncly of the vifiblc figne. And that all doutini^e may
be better taken away,afcerthat he had faid that this bread rcquircth
the hunger of the inward man , he addeth: Mofes and Aaron and
Phinec$,and many other that did eate Manna,plcared God. Why {6} Exo i
hecaufc the fpirituall meaicthcy fpiiitu.illy vnderfioode,rpirituaIly *-♦•
hungredjCpiritually taftcdjthat they might be fpiritually filled. For we
alfo at this day hauc receiued fpirituall meat:but the Sacramet is one
lhing,and the power of rhc Ucramct is an other. A Iitle aftenand by
this he that abideth not in Chrift , an<J in whom Chnft abideth nor,
without douc neither cateth fpiritually hisfleflic ,nor drinkech his
bloodjthough carnally and vifibly he prefleih with teeth the figne of
the body and blood. We hcarc againc that the vifiblc (igne is fet in
coparifon as cotrary to fpirituall eating- Whereby that error is con-
futedjthat the body of Chrift inuifible is in deedc eaten facramctally ,
though not fpiritually.We hearc alfo that nothing is grauccd to pro-
phane & vncleanemen befidey vifiblereceiumgof thcfigne.Herupo Howii
comcth his famous faying,that the other difci pies did eate the bred i"^"i
the Lord, but ludas did eate the bread of the Lordtwherin he plainly '^*
cxcludeth the vnbeleuers from the partaking of the body & blood.
Neither tedeth it to any other ende which he faith in an other place:
Whatmcf uaileft thou , if to ludas was geuenthe bread of Chrift,by Homi
which he might be made bond to the deuclrwhen thou feeft on the 6z.
corrary fide that to Paul was geuen the Angel of the dcuii,by whom **^®'
he might be made perfed in ChriftfHe faith verily in an other place, ]\^^'
that the bread of the Supper was the body of Chrift co the to whom aeb'j
Paul Gid,He that cateth vnworthily, eatcth & drinketh iudgemet to contr
himfclferand that they hauc not therforc nothingjbecsufc they haue ^°"'
receiued noughtily. But in what fenfe, he declareth more fully in an J* ^^
other place. For (taking in had purpofely ro define howe the wicked
pnd cucll doers, which profciFc thcChriftian faith with mouth buc
EEEE iijj ^
Cap. 1 7. Ot the outward mcancs
with deedcs do deny ic > do eate the J»ody of Chriil, and chat againft
the opinion of fomc which thought that they did not eatc in (acra-i
meiuonely but in very dccde.) But neither (faith he) ought it to be
faid that they eatc the body of Chrift , becaufc they are not to be
reckncd among the mcmbics of Chrift. For(to fpcake nothing of
the reft) they can not together be the members of Chrift , and the
loh.6 . fRembres of a harlot.Finally where himfelfe faithjHe that eateth my
*^' . fleili,and drinketh my blood,abidcch in mc^and I in him,he ihcweth
ciuitat. ^^^^ " *^ '^^^ f3crame:ally but in very dccde to eatc y body of Chrift.
Dci ai. For this is to abide in Chrift,that Chrift may abide in him. For he Co
cap. 1 5. faid tiii$ , as though he had faid , he that abideth not in me , and ia
v/hom I abide not , let him not fay or thinkc that he doth eatc my
body, or dnnke my blood. Let the readers wey the things fet as con-
traries in the copanfon to cate,facramentally,and in very deede:and
there fliall remaine no dout.He confirmeththc fame, no Itfle plainly
in thefe wordts : Prepare not youriawe5,but your hart:Hereupon is
this Supper commended. Loe we beleue in Chrift , when we receiuc
by faithrin receiuing we knowe what to thinke.Wc receiue a litlc and
are fatted m hart. Therefore not that which is feene,but that which
is bcleucd , doth fecde. Here alfo that which the wicked receiuc, he
reftraincth to the vifiblc fi^ne:& tcachcth that Chrift is none other-
Con, wife recciucti than by faith.So alfo in an other placc,pronouncing ex-
Fau.lib. prclHy that the good and the cuell do communicate together in the
16 Ser- ^'5"">^^ exclude th the cuell from y true eating of the flcfli of Chrift.
in«i. de Forif they rccciued the thing it fclte.he would not vtterly hauelcft
ver. that vnfpoken which was more fit for his matter. Alio man other
Apoft. place,cnti citmc^ of the eating & the frutc therof, he cocludeth thus:
Then Ihall the body and blood of Chrift be life to eucry man,if that
which in the Sacrament is vifibly recciued,be in the truth it felfe fpi-
riiually catcn,fpir>tuaUy dronke. Therefore whofo make vnbelcuers
partakers of the ficflic and blood of Chrjft,that they may agree with
Auguftine ,let them ihcwe vsthc vifible body ofChrift: forafniuch
as,by his ludgcment, the whole truth is fpiricuall. And it is certainly
gathered out of his wordes, that the Sacramentall eating, when vn-
belefc clofeth vp the cntrie to truth , is as much in cfF;d as vifible or
outwardc eating. If the body of Chrift might be eaten truely and
yet not fpiritually, what lliould that meanc which he faith in an other
place? Ye iha'l not eate thi* body which ye fee,and drinkc the blood
Cn Pfa. whicb they fliall (hedde that lliall crucifis me. I haue commended a
)|. certaine Sacramenre vnco you , being fpiritually vndcrftanded ic
i (hall quicken you. Verily he would not deny but that the fame body
which
To Saluation. Lib.4. 58^
which Chrift ofiVcd for TacrificCjis deliucrcd in the Suppcr:but he did
fcr out the maner of cacinge : namely that bcinge receiucd into hea-*
ucnly glory, by the fecrete power of the Spirire,ic brcatheth hfe into
vs. J oraunt in dede that there is oftentimes foundc in him this ma-
ner of fpeakinge, tliat the body of Chrift js eaten of the vnbcleucrs: Homil.
but he expounderh himfelfc,adding,In Sacrament. And in an other in lok
place he dcfcribcth fpirituall eatinge , in which our bitinges confume >7*
not grace. And leaii mine aduerfarics (houidc lay, that 1 fight with
them with a heapt of places, 1 would knowe of them howe they can
vnwinde thcmfclues from one fayinge of hii , where he fayeth that
Sacraments do workc in the only elect thw which ihcy figure. Truc-
ly they dare not deny but that the bread in the Supper figurcth the
body of Chrift. Wherupon foloweth that the reprobate arc debarred
from the partakmge o^ iu That CyriiJ alfo thought none otherwifc,
thcfe wordcs do declare. As if a man vpon molten waxe do pourc o* lo},^-
iher waxe , he wholly tcmpereth the one waxe with the othcnfo is it cap.17,
occeflary if any man rccciue the flefhe and blood of the Lorde chat
he be loyned with him , that Chrift may be founde in him and he in
Chrift. By thefe worded I ihinkc it is eoidcnt,that they arc bereued
of the true and reall eatinge,thac do but facramentally eatc the bod/
of Chrift , which can not be feuered from his powercand that there-
fore faileth not the faith of the promifes of God,which ceflTeth not 10
raine fi:om heaucn, akiiough the ftones and rockes conceiuc not the
liquor of the raine.
^f This knowledge l}iall alfo cafily draw vsawayfrom the carnal
¥vor(hipping,which feme haue with pcrtierfc rafhnefle ercded in the
Sacrament : becaufe they madeaccompt with themfelues in this ma-
iicr:If it be the body, then both the foule and the Godhead are to-
gether with the body,which now cannot be feuered:thrcforc Chrift
is there to be worshipped . Firftif their accompanyinge which they
pretcnde be denied them,what will they do ? For howe much foeuer
ihcy eric out vpo an abfurdityjif the body be feuered from the foule
and the godheadryci what founde witted and fobcr man can perfwade
himfclfe that the body of Chrift is Chrift ? They thinke themfelues
indcdc gaily to proue it with their logical argumcntcs.But fith Chrift
fpcaketh dilhndly of his body and blood, but defcribeth not the ma-
ner of picfcnce;how will they of a doutfull thingc gather certainel/
that winch they woulde ? What then? If their confcienccschaunce
to be cxercifed with any more greuous feling,lliall not ihcy byandby
with their logicail argumcntcs be diflblued and melt ? namely when
the/ (hall fee themfckcs dcftituce of the certain word of GodyVpoa
Cap.17. Of thcoiitward mcancs
which alone our foules do ftand fafi,whc chey arc called to accompr,
fnd without which they faint at cuery fiUl momcnt:when they ihall
call to mind that the dodrinc & examples of the Apoftles are againd
them, and that themfelues alone are to themfelucs the authors of ic«
To fuch motions (halbe added other not fmall prickinges. Whac^
Shall it be a matter of no importance,to worfhip God in this forme,
where nothmg was prcfcnbcd vnto v$ ? When it concerned the true
worfhip of God, ought they with fo great hghtneffe to hauc atremp-
tcd that of which there is no where read any one wordc ? But if they
had, with fuch humblenefie as they ought,holdcn al their choughtes
vnder the word of God, they would trucly haue harkcned to y which
he faid,Take,eate,drinke,& would haue obcied this commaundemet,
wherein he biddcth the Sacrament to be receiued,not to be worfliip-
pcdBut they which,as it is commaunded of God, do receiue it with-
out worfhipping , arc aflfured that they do norl'waruc from Gods c6*
maundementithan which affuredncs there is nothing better whtn wc
take any worke in hand.Thcy hauc y example of the Apoftlcs,whoni
we read not to haue fallen downe fiat and worlhiipped it, but cuen as
they were fitting, ro haue receiued it & eaten it. They haue t'ne vfe oi
Afi.a.4. jjjg Apoftolike Church, wherin Luke reporterh that tne faithfull did
communicate not in worfhippingc but in breakingc of bread. They
i*Cor. haue the Apoftlcs dodrine, wherewith Paule inflruded the Church
*'* of the Corinthians , profefHng that he had receiued of the Lord thac
which he deliucrcd.
36 And thcfc thingcs verily tend to this cnde, that the godly rea-
ders fhould wey howc perillous it is in fb hie matters to wander from
the fimple worde of God to the dreames of our owne brainc. But
thofe thinges that arc aboue faid,ought to deliucr vs from all douc in
this behalfe. For> that godly foules may therein rightly take hulde of
Chriftjthcy muft needes be lifted vpto heauen. If this be the office
of a Sacrament,toheIp the mindc of man which otherwife is weake,
that it may rife vpward to rcachc the height of fpirituall myftericsj
then tlicy which are holde downe in the outward figne do (Iray from
the right way of fceking Chrifl. What then? Shall wc deny that it is a
fuperftitious worfhippingc, when men do throwe themfelues downe
before bread,to worfhip Chrifl thcrin^DouilefTe the Nicene Synodc
meant to mete with this mifchicfe,whcn it forbade vs to be humbly
Surfum inicntiue to the figncs fet before vs . And for none other caofc was
^^^"^ it in old time ordained, that before the colecration the people fhould
with a loudc voice be put in mindc to hauc their hartes lifted vpward.
The Scripture it fclfe aUo , beiide thac it diligently decUtetb vnto vs
%k9
To Saluation. Lib.4. 5PO
the afccnfion of Chri{l,whcrebv he conueycd away the prcfcnce of
his body from our (ii;ht and conucrfatton : to ihakc away from vs all
carnall chiukjiigc of iiim , fo oft as it makeih mention of him , com- Col.j.^
maundcch v$ to be in mmdes raifed vpward, and to fckc him in hea-
uen (ictmg at the riglu hand of the Father. According to this rule he
was r.uhcr to be fptrifually worfliipped in heauenly gloric , than this
fo perillous a kindc of worfliipping to be dcuifed , full of carnall and
groHe opinion of God. Wherfore they that hauc inucntcd the wor-
ihipping of the Sacramcnr,haue.not only dreamed it of thcmfelucs
befidc the Scripturc,in which no mction of it can be lhcwcd(which
yet (hould not hauc bin ouerpaflcd if it had bin accept iblc to God.)
But alio all the Scripturccryinge out againilit,they haue framed to
thcmfelue ^ a God after the will of their owne luft,lcauing the Jiuing
God. For what is idolatry, if this be not, to worfhippe the giftes in
fteede of the giuer hiairelfc?Whercin they haue doublcly offended:
For both the honor tal<en from God '.v:is conueyed to a creature : flc
he himfeifc aifo diHionored in t.hc dctihngand prophaningc of his
bencHtjwhcn of his holy Sacrament IS made a curfcd idole. But Ice
*s contranwife , kaU we fail into the fame pit , throughly fettle our .
earcs,eics,harts,mifides,& tongues in the holy.do<^''Mie of God. Foe
that is the fcholc of the holy Ghoft,thc belt fcholemaifter,in which
furh prohr is accained,that nothing nccde more to be gotten fro any
where clfcbut we wiHingly ought to be ignoiatof whaifocuer is not
lauohtinit.
j7 But nowc (as fuperftitionjwhcn it hath once pafled the righc
boundcs,maketh no end of finning)they fel a great way further. For
they h.'.uc deiiifed Ceremonies altogether ttraunge fro the inftitu-
tionof fhe Supper, to this end only that they might giuediuine ho-
nors to the (ii;ne. We yeelde(fay they)thi^ worlhip to Chrift.Firft,if
this were done in the S^^.pper,! would fay that that worfliipping only
is lawfuil, w'.iich rcftcth not in the fignc,but is d^reded to Chrift fit*
tinge HI h?^uf n. But nowe by what pretenfe do they boaft that they
WOi iluppc Chrill in that bresdcwhcnthey hauc no promife thereof?
They confccrate an hoft, as they call it , which nhcy may cary abouc
in pon:^x',vvhich they may flaewefoorth in a common ga^inge to be
looked yppon, worfliipped, and called vppon. I askc by what power
they thinke it to be rightly confccrate. Verily they will bring foorth
thofe wordSjThis is my body. But I will obied to the contrary,thati6
was therewithall faid, Ta'.ce and eatc. Neither will 1 do that of no-
thing. For when a promife is knit to a commaundemcnt,! fay that the
promifc is fo contained vndcc the commaundcRieCj that being feuc*
Cap, 1 7. Of the outward mcancs
p^ red it is made no promifc at all . This (halbc made plainer by 3 like
, , example. God gauc a commaundement, when he faid,Call vpon me:
He added a promife , 1 will hcarc thee. If any man calling vponTe-
cer and Paule ^ do glory vpon this promife , will not all men crie out
that he doth wrongfully ? And what other thing I pray yQUjdo they
which leauing the comaundement concerning eating.do catch hold
of a maimed promife, this is my body,to abufc it to ftrangc ceremo-
nies from the inftitution of Chrift? Let vs therefore remember that
this promiic is giucn to them which kepe the commaundement ioi-
ned with it:but that they be deftitute of all the word, which rcmouc
the Sacramct to any other way. We hauc heretofore entreated hovy
the myftcry of the holy fupper ferueth our Faith before God . But
forafmuch as the Lord doth hcrcnot only bringe into our rcmcm- ^
brancc (b great largeflc of his bountyjas wc haue before {hewcd,bue
doth as it were from haade to hande bringe it foorth,and ftirrcth vs
to acknowledge it:he doth therewithal! warne vs that we be not vn-
thankcfiiU to fo plentifull iiberality;but rather that we fhould publifh
it with fuch praiies as it is rocete,and aduaunce it with thankefgiuing.
I^g, J3, Therefore when he deliuered the inftitution of the Sacrament it felf
i5». to the Apoftlcs , he taught them that they fhoulde do it in remem-
i.Cor. branceofhim. Which Paulcexpoundeth, to declare theLordcs
**'*^' death. That is,publikely and altogether with one mouth openly to
confefie , that all our affiance of life and faluation is repofed in the
death of the Lorde : that we may glorifie him with our confcffion,
and may by our example cxhorte other to giuc glory to him . Here
againe it appcareth whereunto the markc of this Sacrament is dire
^ed , namely to exercife vs in the remembrance of the death of
Chrin:.For>this that we are commaunded to declare the Lords death
till he come to iudge , is nothing elfe but that we (hould publiHi that
with confeillon of mouth^which our faith hath acknowledged in the
Sacrament,that iSjthat the death of Chrift is our life . This is the fe-
cond vfeof the Sacramenti which perteineth to outward confcflfion*
58 Thirdly the Lorde alfo willed it to be to vs in ftcede of an ex-
hortation , tha which none other can more vehemently encourage &
cnflame vs both to purenes and holines of life , and alfo to charitic,
peace,and agreement . For the Lord doth therein fo communicate
his body to vs , that he is made throughly one with vs, and we with
him. Now fith he hath but one body, whereof he makcih v$ all par-
taketSjit is ncccflary that all we alfo be by fuch partakinge made one
body.Which vnity the bread which is deliuered in the Sacramct,re-
piefcoccth: which as it is made of many graincs in fuch fort mingled
(ogeih^^
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 5PI
together that one can not be difcerned from an othenafter the fame
maner we alfo ought to be conioyncd & knit together with fo grcac
agrecmct of mindcs, that no difagrcracnt or diuifion come bctwcnc
vs. This I had rather to be expreflcd with Paulcs wordes. The cup
ofblc(Iinge(raythhe)which we bleflc^s the communicating of the* Cor,
blood of Chrili:& the bread of blcfling which wc brcake,is the par- "O'*^*
takingc of the body of Chrift. Therefore wc all are one body , that
partake of one bread. We fhall hauc very well profited in the Sacra-
ment, if this thought fofhalbc emprinted &engraucin ourmindes,
that none of the brethren can be hurt,derpifed,refurcd,aburcd,or in
any wife be oftcndcd of vs, but that therewithal! wc do in fo doinge
hurt , defpife and abufc Chrift with our iniurious deaiingcs : that wc
can notdifagree wich our brethren! but that we muft therewithali
difagree with Chrift : that Chrift can not be loued of vs , but that he
muft be loued in our brethren : that what care we haue of our owne
body , fuch alfo we ought to hauc of our brethren which arc mem-
bers of our body : as no part of our body is touched with any feling of
griefcjwhich imot I'pread abroad into all the other parts, fo wc muft
not fuffcrjour brother to be grcucd with any euil whcrof wc ihould
not alfo be touched with compaflion.Therforc Auguftine not with-
out caufe fo oft callcth this Sacrament the bondof charity.For what
{harper fpur could be put to vs,to ftirre vp mutuall charity among vs,
than when Chnft giumg himfelfe to vs,doth not only allure vs with
his owne example that we flioulde mutually dedicate and deliucr our
felues one to an other;but in fo much as he maketh himfelfe comon
to all,he maketh all vs alfo one in himfelfe ?
59 Butherebyisthat very well confirmed which I haue fayd in an
other place, that the true miniftration of the Sacramct ftandeth noc
without the word.For vvhatfoeucr profit commeth to vs of the Sup-
per, requireth the word : whether we be to be confirmed in Faith,or
to be excrcifed m confcffion » or to be ftirred vp to duety , praicr is
needefull. Therefore nothingc canbemorcdifordcrly doncinthe
Supper, than if it be turned to a dumrac adion : as hath bin done vn-
der the tyranny of the Pope. For they would haue the whole force
of confccration to hangc vpon the intent of the Pricft,3S thouoh this
nothing pertained to the pcoplc,to whom it moft of all bchoued that
the myftery ftiould be declared. But thereupon hath growcn thiscr-
rour , that they marked not that thofe promifes wherewith the con-
fccration is made, are direded not to the clcmcntcs themfclucs, buc
to them that receiuc them.But Chrift fpeaketh not to the bread,thac
it may be made his body^buc commaundcth his difciples to catc^and
Cap. 1 7, Of the outward meanes
promileth to them the communicating of his body and blood. And
none other order doth Paul teach, than that together with the bred
and the cup , the promifes ihould be offrcd to the faithful!. Thus it \i
truely. We ought not here to imagine any magkaUcnchaimtmenr,
that it be fufhcient to haue mumbled vp the vvordes , .is ihoogh the
clemcntes did heare thcm:butict vs vnderftande that thofe wordcs
are a liudy prcachingc, which may ediHe the hearers, which mnv in-
wardly pearcc mto their mindes, which may be cmpnnted and fet-
tled in their hartes,which may {hewe foorth cfTedualncfrc in the ful-
filhng of that which it promileth. By the(e reafons it clearcly appca-
rcthjthat the layinge vp of the Sacrament, which many do earneftly
require, that it may be extraordinarily diltributed to the licke^is vn«
profitable. For either they ihall rcceiue k without reiicarling of the
inftinjtion of Chiift, or thcmimfter (hall together with the fi:;nc
ioyne the true declaration of the mvftcry. In lilcnce is abufc & fault.
If the promifes be rehearfed , and the myftcne declared, that they
which {hall receiue it may rcceiuc it with f rutcythcre is no taufc why
we (hould dout that this is the true cortfecration. To what cvid then
will that other confccration come , the force whereof Gommcth not
fofarre as to the ficke meneBut they that do fo,haue the example of
the old Church. I graunt:but in fo great a matter,& in which we en e
not without great daungcr,nothinge is fafer than to folow the truetb
it fclfc.
40 Now as wc fee that this holy bread of the Supper of the Lord
is fpirituall meate, no leflc fweete and delicate than hcalthfull to the
godly worfliippers of God,by the tall whereof they feele thatChnft
is their lJfe>whom it raifeth vp to thankefgiuing, to whom it is an ex-
hortation to mutuall charity among thcmfelues : fo ofi the other fide
it is turned into a moft noyfome povfon to all them whofc Fayth it
doth not nouriih and con6rme,and whom it doth not ftirre vp to co-
fcflion of praife .ind to chanty. For as bodily meatejwhen n findcth
a ftomach poflcfled with eiull hu«iors,being it fclfc alfo thcrby tnadc
cuilland corrupted doth rather hurt than nouriftie: fothis fpirituall
meatr,if it light vppon a foule defiled with malice and naughtineife>
throweth it downc headlong wif h greater fall : verily not by the fault
of the meate it felfe,but becaufe to defiled and vnbeleuin^ie men no-
thin^i;c is clcane, though oiherwife i: be neuer fo much fan^ificd by
Yitf.j J the blelTing of the Lord. For(as Paule fayrh) they that eate & drinkc
i.Cor. ynwonhily, arc gilty of the body and blood of the Lord, end do eate
•'•*^ and drinke iudgement to themfelues>not difcerning the body of the
Lord. For^fuch kinde of me as without any fparde of Faithj without
any
To Saluation. Lib4. 5P2
my tcalc of charity , do thruft themfclucs foorch like fwinc to take
the Supper of the Lordc , do not difcerne the body of the Lorde.
I^or info much as they do not bcleuc that chat body is their life,
they do as much as in them ly eth difhonor it , fpoyhngc it of all the
dignitie thereof, and finally in fo rcceiuinge it they prophanc ind
dcHle it. But in fo much as being eftraunged and difagrecinge from
their brethrc, they dare mingle the holy (igne of the body of Chrift
with their difagrccmcntes, it is no thanke to them that the body of
Chrift is not rent in funder, and limmemcale torne in pecces. And
fo not vnworthily they are gilty of the body and blood of the Lorc^
which they do with vngodlmes full of facrilcge lb fowly defile.Thcr-
fore by this vnworthy catingc , they take to themfclucs damnation.
For whereas they hauc no Faith repofed in Chrift , yet recciuing the
Sacrament they profefle that there is faluationfor them no where
cHc than in him, and do forfwearc all other affiance. Whcrforc they
chemfelues are accufers to themfelues , they themfclucs pronounce
witnclfe againft themfclucs, and they themfclucs fcalc their owne
damnation. Againe when they being with hatred and cuill will diui-
ded & dr.iwcn in funder from their brethren, that is, from the mem-
bers of Chrift , haue no parte in Chrift : yet they do teftilic that this
is the only (riluation to communicate with Chrift , & to be made one
with him. For this caufe Paule commaundeth,chat a man prouc him- i.Cor«
fclfejbcforc that he cate of this bread or drinke of this cup. Whereby ii.at.
(as I expounde it)he meant that cuery man (hould defccnd into him-
lelfc, and wcic with himfclfe, whether he do with inward affiance of
hart reft vpon the f^luatio which Chrift hath purchaccd:whethcr he
acknowledge it with confeffion of mouth ; then whether he do with
defirous cndeuour of innocence and hohneflc afpire to the following
of Chrift: whether after bis example he be ready to giuc himfclfe to
his brethren, & to comunicate himfclfe to them with whom he hath
Chrift comon to him:whethcr»as he himfclfe is accompted of Chrift,
,hc do likewife on his behalfe take all his brethren for members of his
owne body.whethcr he couct to cheri{h,dcfendc, and helpe them as
his owne members. Not for that thefe duties both of Faith & chari-
ty can now be perfe<f^ m vs:but becaufe we ought to endeuor this, &
with all our defnes to long toward it,that wc may daily more & more
cncrcafe our Faith begon.
41 Commonly when they go about to prepare men to fuch wor-
thinc"; of e.iting,they haue in cruell wife tormented and vexed poorc
confcicnccs : and yet they brought ncuer a whit of all thofc thingcs
that might fcrue co the purpofc.Thcy faid that thoic did eat worthily
Cap.17. Of the outward mcancs
which were in ftate of gracc.To be in ftatc of grace they expounded
to be pure & clcanfed from all finnc. By which dodrine all the men
that eucr haae at any lime bin or now be in earth jWcre debarred fro
the vfcofthis Sacrament. For if we go about this, to fetch our wor-
thineCfe from our felues, we are vtccrly vndone : onely defpeire and
damnable ruine abideth for vs.Though we endeuor with our whole
ftrcngthcSjWe (hall notbinge more preuaile, but that then at laft wc
flialbc moft vnworthy,when wc haue moft of all trauailcd about fec-
kinge of worthineffe. To faluc this fore, they haue deuifed a way to
attaine worthine{rc:chat,as much as in vs lieth^making examination,
and requiring of our felues accompt of all our doings,we fliould with
contrition , confedion , and fatisfadion deanfe our vnworthineife
which way ofcleanfinge, what maner ofthingciti$,we haue already
(hewed there where was more conucnient place to fpeakc of it . So
much as feructh.for oar prefent purpofe , I fay tliat thefe be to hun-
gry and vanifhinge comfortes to difmaied and difcouraged confcien*
CCS & fuch as are ftriken with horrour of their finne. For if the Lord
by fpcciall forbidding.admitteth none to the partakinge of his Sup-
per but the righteous & innocent:there needeth no fmal hccde that
may make a man aiTured of his owne righteoufnes which he heareth
to be required of God. But whereby is this aflurednes confirmed vnto
▼s,that they are difchargcd afore God, which haue done fo much as
in them lay ? But although it were fo, yet when fhall it be that a man
may be bold toaifure himfclfe that he hath done as much as in him
lay^So wh^n there is made no certaine aflurancc of our worchinefie,
the entry fliall alway remaine fhut by that horrible forbidding,whcr-
by is pronounced that they eate & drinke iudgement to themfelues,
which eate and drinke vnworthily.
41 Now it is eafie to iudge what maner of dodirine this is which
reigncth in the Papacy,& fro what author it hath proceeded, which
with the outragious rigor thereof bcreueth and fpoyIcth,miferablc
finncrs and fuch as be tormented with feare and forow, of the com-
fort of this Sacramenr,in which yet all the fwetedehcates of the Go-
fpell were fet before ihem. Surely the deuiil could by no redicr way
deftroy men.than by fo making them fcnfelefle,rhat they coulde not
percciue the taft and fauour of fuch foode , wherewith it was the will
of the moft good hcaucnly Father to feede them, Leaft therefore wc
runne into fuch hcadlonge downcfall, let vs remember that this holy
banket is medicine to the ficke,comfort to (inners,ljbcrall gift to the
poore:which bring no profit to the health yjrighteouSjand riche,if a-
ny fuch could be found. For whcras in icChriit is giu^n vs for meate:
wc
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 5^3
wc vndcrftandc that without him vrc pync , Ihrtic, and faint, like as
famine dcrtroicih the hutly ftrcngth of the body. Againc whcras he
is giutn vs for hfc : wc vndcrftande that wi.iiout him wc are in our
felucs vtcerly dead. Wherefore this is ihc worthincHc both the on-
ly and bcft that wc can bringe to God , it we offrrVo him our ownc
vilcncfle and(as 1 may lo cali ji)vnwordiinciic,ihatofhis mercy he
may make vs woi rhy oi him.if we defpetrc in our fclues^that wc may
be comforted in him ; if we humble our fcIucSjthat we m^y be raifed
vp of him : if wc iccuic oar fciucs , that wc may be luftihcd of him:
moreover if wc afpiie to that vnity which he commcndcth to vsin.
hisSuppcrrandashema'.ceth vsall,oncinhimfclfe,foif wcwifh to vs
all altogether one fouie,one hart one tongc.If we hauc rhefc things
throu<;hly well weyed and confidercd/ach £houe,hics although they
fluke vs,yct [hall ncucr ouenhrow vs. As,how fhould wc being nee-
dy and naked of al good ihings,wc defiled with filthincflc offinnes,
wc halfc dead, eate the body ol^ the Loidc worthily?VVe will rather
thinkc that we being poore come tothclibct3lgiuer,we fcckciothc
Phificiar,we finners to the author of righteourncfl'e,(inally wc dead
men to him that giueth life : that that worthineffe which is com-
maunded of God,conlilicth chiefly of Faith,which rcpofeth al things
in Chrift and nothinge in vs : and next of charity, and the felfc fame
charity which it is enough to ofFcr vnpcrfc^toGod,thathemay cn-
ci eafe it to b€ttcr,forarmuch as it can not be giucn pcrfed. Some o-
ther agrecingc with vs in this , that the worthineffe it fcife confifteth
in Fayth and charity : yet in the measure of worthineffe hauc gone
farrc out of the way , requiringc a perfection of Fayth , whcrcunto
nothing may be addcd,& a charity cgall with thai which Chriil haih
{hewed toward vs. But hereby they do none otherwife th.^n ihofc o-
ther btforc, driue all men away from comminge to this holy Supper.
For if their fcntencc fiiouldc take phcc,no man (houldc receiue but
vnworthily , forafmucli as ail without exception fhouldtr be holden
gilty and conuid oFtheir vnperfcdneffe. And truely it were a pome
of too much amazed dulneffe , I will not fay fooltfhncffc , to require
fuch perfcdion in the Sacrament, as may make the Sacrament voidc
and fuperfliious : which was not ordained forth-: perfed, but forthc
wcake and feeble to awake.to ftirre vp,to pricke forward.and excrcifc
the affcdion of Faith and charity, and to corred the defaut of cither
of them.
4 J But fo much as conccrneth the outward forme of doing, whe-
ther the faithfull receiue it in their hand or no:whcthcr they deuide
itjor cucry one caie that which is giuca himiwhether they pucagainc
FFFF
Cap.i 7- Of the outward meanes
the cup in the hand of the Dcacorr,or deliucr it to the nextrwhcthcr
the bread be leucned,or vnleuened : whether the wine be icdde or
white : it makcth no matter. Thcfe thinges be indifferent andleft in
the hberty of the Church. Howebeit it is ccrtainc, that the vfagc of
the old Church waSjthat cuery one Ihould take it into his hand. And
Chrift faidjDiuide it among you.The hiftories report,that it was Ic-
uened and common breadc before the time of Alexander bifhoppc
of Rome , which firft delitcd in vnleuened bread:but for what reaibn
I fee notjvnkfifc it were with a newe fight to draw the eies of the c6-
mon people to wondringe at it , rather than to inftru^ their mindes
with good religion.l adjure all the that are touched with any though
but light leaie of godlincs,to tcU whether they do not cuidently fee,
both how much more brightly the glory of God fhineth herein,and
how much more abundant fwectenes of fpirituall comfort commeth
to the faithfull, than in thefe colde and plaierlike trifles, which bring
none other vfe but to deceiue the fenfe of the aroafcd people. This
they call the holdinge of the people in religion, when bcingc made
foolifh and fenfleffe with fuperftition it is draMvcn whether they lift.
3f any man will defende fuch inuentions by antiquity,! my felfc alfo
am not ignorant how auncicnt is the vfe ofchrefmcjand blowing in
Baptifme : Howcnyc to the agcof the ApoftlesthcSupperof the
Lorde was infcded with ruftinefle : but this verily is the wayward-
neHc of mans boldencffc , which can not withholde it felfe but that
it rnu!^ alway play and be wanton in the myftcrics of God.Butlettc
vs remember that God doth fo highly efteeme the obedience of his
word, that he willcth vs in it to iudge both his Angels and the whole
worlde. Now, bidding farewell to fo great a heape of ccrcmoniesric
mi^ht thus haue bin moft comlily miniftrcd,if it were oft and at leaft
cuery wcke fette before the Church, but that firft they iTiouldc begin
with publikc praiers:then a fermoO fhould be made:thcn the minifter,
hsuinge bread and wine fctte vpon the boordc,(houldc rehearfe the
ififtittjtion of the Suppcnand then ftioulde declare the promifcs that
arc in it Icfte vnto vs : and therewithal! (houlde excommunicate all
them that by the Lords forbiddinge are debarred from it, afterwardc
they Ihoulde pray that with whathberality the Lorde hath giucn vs
this holy foode , he woulde inftrud and frame vs alfo with the fame
Faith & thankefulneffc of minde toreceiue it.&thatforafmuch as wc
zrenotofourfeluesjhe would of his mercy make vs worthy of fuch a
bnnkcf.that then either Pfalmes fliould be iong,or fomwhat red, and
the faithful (hould in femcly order comunicate of the holy baket,thc
minifters breaking tiie biead & giumg it to the pcoplc:chat when the
Supper
To Saluation. Lib4. . . 594.
Supper is endcdjCxhorution fbould be made co pure Faith & contef*
[ion oFP.iiil),to chancy, and to manors mete for Chrrlhans;lart of all
ihnt giuing of thanks fliould be rchcar(cd,& prailcb be fong to God*
which beinj; cndc<:i the cOngrcgscion ihould be let go in peace.
<I4 Thefcthingesthatwchauehithertofpokcnof this Sacrament ■>
do iargel/ flicwcthat it was not therefore ord3ined,rhat it ihouid be
recciucd ycnreiy once, & that fligiitly for maners 'i^Vt (as now com- '-'^
monly the curtomc is)but that it thould be in often vfe to all Chnfti-
ans,that with often remembrance they lliould repcate the paftjon of
Chrift : by which remembrance they might luibinc and iirengthen
their Faith, & exhort themfelues to hng confeflion of praifcto God,
and to pubhih his goodncsrHnaily by which they might nourifii mu-
tuall chanty ,and teihfic it amongc ihemfcliits,whercof they faw the
knot in the vnity of chc body of Chiili . For fo oft as we communi-
cate of the lignc of the body of the LordjWc doasby atokcngiuen
& rccciued, entcrchaungeably bmde our felucs one to an other vnto
alldueticsof loue,thatnoncof vsdoany thing whereby he may of-
fend his brother , nor leauc anv dung vndone whereby he may htlpc
hfm,when ncde rec]uireth and abili;y futhceth. Thatfuch was the vfe
of the Apoliohkc Church , Luke rchcarfeth in the Ades , when he
fatth that the faithful! were contmuingc in the dodrinc of the Ape-
itlcs,in communicatingjin brc.ihn^ of brcadjand in praiers.So was it
altogether mete tobcdone,that therefhouldebenoaflfcmbly of the
Church without the word,praicis, partaking of the Supper and almej.
That this order wasalfb inftitute amonge the Corinthians we may
fufficicntly gather of Paule : and it is cerfaine that in many ages afr
tcrward it was in vfc.For thereupon came thofe olde Canons, which
they father vpon Anacletus & Calixtus, that when x\\z coiifecration
is done,all fnould communicatc,that wil not be without the dores of
the Church. And it is red in thole olde Canons, which they call the
Canons of the Apoftles:that they which contiiiue not vnto the end,
& CO not recciue the holy communion, muft be correded as me that
moue vnquietnes of the Church. Alfo in the Councell a^ Antioch,it
was decreed that they which enter into y Church, & hearethe Scrip-
tures,& do abllaine from the communion, fhoulde be remoucd from
the Church,till they haue amended this fault. Which although in the
firrt Counccll at Tolctum it was cither fomwhat qualified or at leaft
fet forth in milder wordes,yet it is tliere al^o dccrccd,that they which
when they haue heard the fermon are found ncucr to communicate,
fhould be warncd:if afcer waraing they i)bAaine)they fhoulde be de-
barred from it.
JFFFF i^
Aft.!.
41-
Cap.i /• Of the outward mcancs
45 Vcniy by thcfc ordinances the holy men meant to retaine an<!
maincime the often vfe of the Communion,which ofte vfc they had
recciucd from the Apoftlcs thcmfclues, which they fawc to be moft
holfomc for the faithful!, and by litle and Utlc by the neghgcncc of
In (J.ca. ^be common people to growc out of vfc. Auguflinc telhfieth of his
lohan. owuc timc:Thc Sjcrament(faith he)of this thing,of the vnity of the
tra^.atf Lords body,is fomewherc daily, fomcwhcre by ccrtamc d'.ftanccs of
dayes, prepared vpon the Lordes table, and is there recciued at the
table, to fome vnto life ,oto other fomc vmo deftrudion . And in
the fiift Epiftlc to lanuarius : fome do daily communicate of the bo-
dy and blood of the Lorde : feme rcceiue it at certaine daiesrin (bmc
places there is no day let palfc wherein it is not offerednn fome other
places onely vppon the Saturday and the Sunday, and in fome other
places ncuer but on the Sunday. Bur fcrafmuch as the common peo-
ple was (as wchauc fayd)fomwhatilacke, the holy men did call ear-
In ca.1. ncftly vpon them with fliarp rcbukinges,leaft they fhoulde leeme to
Horn, vvinke ai fuch IloihfulntHe.^uch an example is in Chryfottome vpon
26,1a. fheEpiftletotheEpheGans. Iris not faid vnto him that dilhonored
the bankettwherefore didft thou fit downe ? bur,whererore didft thoa
come in ? Whofoeucr is not partaker of the myfteries , he is wicked
andlhamcleflc forthathe ftandeth here prefent. I bcfccchc you , if
any be called to a banket,wafhc-th his handes,fiitcth downe.fcemcih
to prepare himfelfc to eate, and then doth taft of nothingc : ihall he
roc ihame both the banket , and the maker of the banket ? So thou,
ftanding among them thit with prayer do prepare themfclues to re-
ceiue the holy meatc , half cucn in this that thou haft not gone away
confefled that thou art one of the number of them , at the laft thou
doeft not partake : had it not bin better that thou hadft not bin pre-
ftnt.Thou Wilt fay,I am vnworthy.Therfore neither waft tliou wor-
thy of (he communion of praier, which is a preparinge to the rccci*
uing of the holy myftery.
46 And truely this cuftome,whichcommaudeth to communicate
yearely onqcis amoft certaine inuentionof the deuill,by whofe mi-
niftcry for uer it was brought in . They fay that Zepherinus was au-
thor of that decree,which it is not likely to haue bin fuch as we now
haue it. For he by his ordinance did peradueture not after the worft
maner prouide for y church,as the times then were.For it \% no dout
but that then the holy fupper was fette before the faithfull fo oft as
rhcy came together in alfembly, neither is it any dout but tha t a good
part of them did communicate. But when it fcarfely at any time hap-
pened chat all did communicate together^ and whereas ic was necef-
^i i i . fary
To Saliiation, Lib.4. •^py
fary that they which were rainglcd withpiophanc men & idolaters,
fliouldc by fome outvvardc fignc t.-ftifie their faith-.thc holy man for
order & policies fakc,appointcd that d^y,whercin the whole people
of Chiiftians (hould by partaking of the Lords fupper vttcr a cofef-
fion of their faith. The ordinance of Zepherinus bcingc otherwifc
good hath bin cuill wreftcd of them that came after, whe a certainc
law was made of one communicating ycarcly: whereby it is come to
paire,that almoft al men whe they haue once c6muniC3te,as though
they had gaily difchargedthcmfclucs for al the reft of the yerCjAcpc
foundly on both eares. It ought to haue bin fnrre otherwife done.E-
uery weke at the leaft , the Lordes ta!)le Ihoulde be fet before the af-
fembly of y Chriftians:thc promifcs Ihould be dcclared,which might
feedc v$ fpiritually at it:none fliculd in dede be compelled by necef-
luy,but ail fhould be exhorted and pricked forward:the fluggilhnefic
alfo of the flothfull {hould be rebuked. All ihould by heapes,as hun-
gry mcn,come together to fuch dainties. Not without rightfull caufc
therefore at the beginning I complained, that by the craft of the dc-
uill this cuftome was thruft in , which when it appointcth one cer-
tainc day of the yeare , makcth men fiothfuU for all the reft of the
yeare. We fee in deedc that this perucrfe abufe was crept in euen in
the time ofChryfoftome.'but we may alfo therewithal fee how much
it difpleafcd him, For he complaineth with greuous words in the fame
place which 1 cocn nowalleaged , that there is fo great inequality of
this matter, that often in Ibme times of the yere they came not euen
when they were cleane , but at Eafter they came euen when they were
vncleane. Then he crieth out : O cuftome. O prefumption.Thcn in
vaine is the daily offering vfed : in vaine we ftandc at the aharithere
is none that partaketh together with vs. So farre is it of that he aiio^
wed It by his authoyty adioyncd to it.
47 Out of the fame (lujp proceded alfo an other ordinace, which
hath ftolen away or violently taken away the halfe of the fupper from
the better ni'iber of the people of God,nameIy the figneofthe blood,
which being denied to lay and profane men (for with fuch titles for-
fooih they let out Gods inheritance) became a peculiar pofTeflion to
fhaucn and annointed men. It is the commaundement of the eternal!
Godjthat al fhould drinkenvhich comaundcment man dare difconti*
nue and rcpcll with a nev/ & contrary law, commaunding that not aU
ihould drinke. And that thefe lawmakers fhoulde not fecmc to Heht
without reafon againft their God,thcy pretend perils that might hap-
pen if this holy cup were commonly giuc to albas though thofe dafi-
^rs had not bio forcfeene 6c marked of the eternall wifdom of God^
F F F F li;
Cap. 1 7. Of the outward mcanes
And then futtelly forfooth they rcafon , that the one is enough for
both. For if (fay thcy)it be the body,it is whole Chriil, which ca no t
now be fcuered from his body .Therefore by accompanyingc the bo-
dy containeth the blood. Loe how our wit agreeth with God, when
it hath neuer fo htlc btgon with loofercines, to be wanton & wilder.
The Lord (hewing bread/aith that it is his body : when he ftieweth
the cup,he calleth it his blood. The boldneffe of mans reafon,crieth
out contrariwife that the bread is the blood,and the wine is the bo-
dy : as though the Lorde had for no caufe feuered his body from his
blood both in wordes and in (igncs : or as though it hadde cuer bin
heard fpoke that the body or blood of Chnft is called God & man.
Vcnly if he had meant to fignifie whole himrclf,hc might hauc faid
it is I ; as He 1$ wont to fpcake in the Scriptures , and not , this is my
body, this is my blood. But he willinge to hclpe our weakenefl'e,did
fct the cuppe feuerally from the bread, to teachc that he fuffifeth no
ielfe for dnnke than for meate. Now let one part be take away,theii
we (hall hnde but the one halfe of the nourifhments in him. There-
fore although It be true which they pretend,that the blood is in the
bread by way of accompanyingc, and agame the body in the cup,yet
they defraude godly foules of the confirmation of faith which Chrift
dehuereth v> as neceflary.Thcrfore biddingc their futtleties farewell,
we muli holde faft the profile which 1$ by the ordinance of Chrift in
the two earncfts.
48 I know in deede that the minifters of Sathan do here cauill,as
it is an ordinary thing with them to make mockery of the Scriptures.
Firfl they alleage that of one bare doinge oupht not to be gathered
a rule whereby the Church fhouldc be boundc to pcrpetuall obfer-?
uinge. Bur they lye when they fay that it was but a bare doinge : for
Chrift did not only deliuer rhe cup, but alfo did mflirute that his A-
poftles {hould in time to come do the fame.For they are the words of
a commaundcr,drinkc ye all of this cup. And Paule fo rehearfeth tbac
it was a deede , thaf he alfo commendcth it for a ccrtaine rule. An o-
thcr ftartinge hole is,tbat the Apoftles alone were receiued of Chrift
to the partakinge gf this flipper whom he had already chofen and ta-
ken into the order of the facrificinge Piifftes. But I wouldehauc
them anfwere me to fiuc queftions,from which they iball not be able
to efcape, but that they (haibc eafily conuinced with their lies. Firft,
by what oracle haue they this fblution reuealed , beinge fo ftraungc
from' the wordc of God ? The Scripture reckeneth twelue that faiic
withlefus : but it doth notfo ohicurethe dignitic of Chrift thatic
calleth thcmfacrificing Pncftcs of which name we will fpcake here-
aftet
To Saluation. Lib.4, ^96
after in place fie for it. Though he gauc it then to the tweluc , yet he
commaundcd that they (hould do the famcjnamely that ihey ihould
fodiftnbute it among them. Secondly, why in that better age, from
the ApoftJes almolt a thoufand ycares, were nil wichout cKccptiofi
made partakers of both the iignes ? was the olde Church ignorant
what gcftes Chrift had reeeiucd to his Supper ? It were a point of
moft defpcrate (hamelefneffe , here to fticke and diily m graunting
it to be irue.There remaine y eccleiiafticall hiltones, there rcmainc Libr.dc
the bokes of the olde writers, which miniftcr euident teftimonies q^^^^-^^^c-
this matter. The fleflic (faith TertuUian) is fed with the body and x^^^]i^^
blood of Qiriil, that the foule may be fatted which fedingvpo God. rir. lib.
Howe(faid Ambrofc toTheodolius) wilt thou receiuc with fuch ^. caS.
handes the holy body of the Lorde? VVith what boldnefle wilt thou '^."^'"* '
with thy mouth partake of the cup of the precious blood? And Hie- *^^J^* ^^
romc faith . The priefts which make the Thankcfgeujng, and do z.\ui.
diftribute the blood of the Lorde to the people. Chrifoftome. Not chrif.in
as in the olde lawe the Prieft did eatc part , and rhc people part : but ^ ^'Ir'
one body is fet before all , and one cup. Thofe things that perteinc f.^'^'j, *
to the Thankefgcuing, are all common betwecne tlic PrieQ and the riiiia.
peoplc.The felfjc fame thing doth Auguftine teftifie in many places.
49 But whydifpute I about a thing moft knowcn ? Lee all the
Grekc andLatine writers be redoucr : fuch teftimonies fliall echc
where offer Fhemfelues. Neither was this cullome growen out of vfc,
while there remained onexliop of purenefl'e in ihe Church.Gregory,
whom you may rightly fay to haoe bene the laft Bifhop of Romc,
leachcth f it was kept in his time . What is the blood of ihe lambe,
ye haue nowe learned , not by hearing but by drinking. His blood is
poured into themouthesof the faithfull. Yea it yet endured fours
Hundred yearcs after his death,when allthines were growcn out of
kindc. For neither was that taken onely for an vfage, but alfo for an
inuiolable lawe. For then was in force the reucrence of Gods infti-
tutio,and they douted not that it was facrilege , to feuer thofe things ^
which the Lorde had conioincd. For thus faith Gelafius. We haue j-^^^
founde, that fome rccciuing onely the portion of the holy body, do dift. 2.
abftcine from the cup. Let them without dour, bycaufe they fccme ca.co-
tobc bounde with i wotc not what fuper{luion,eitherreceiuethe ^*^'''
Sacramets whole,or be debarred from them whole. For the diuiding 4^^"^*^-
of this miniftcry is not committed without great facrilcge.Thofe rea-
fons of Cvprian were heard, which truely ought to moue a Chriftian
minde. Howe (faith he) do we teache or prouoke them to (hed their
blood in the confcffing of Chrift, if we deny his blood to them that
F F F F iijj
Cap.i 8. Of the outwardc mcanes
fhall fight ? Or how do we make them fit for the cup of Martyrdome
if we do not fiift in the church by the right of comunion admit the
todrinke the cup of the Lorde- Whereas the Canomfts dorcftrainc
that decree of Gelaiius to the Priclles, that is fo childilh a cauill that
it ncde not to be confuted.
50 Thirdly ,why did l-e (imply fay of the bread,that they (houlde
cate:bur of the cuppe, that they (hould all drinke ? cuen as if he had
meant offer purpofc to mete with the craft of Siuhan. Fourthly,if(a$
ihcy would haue it) the Lord vouchlaued to admit to his fupper only
facr:ficingc Pricftrs,what man cucr durft call to the partakmge of it,
ftraungcrs whom the Lord had exc]uded?yea and to the partaking of
that giftjthe power whereof was not in their hands, without any co-
maundement of him which only could giue it>Yea vpon confidence
of what warrant do they vfe at this day to diftribute to the common
people the Signc of the body of Chnft , if ihcy haue neither com*
maundcmcnt nor example of the Lord?Fittlyjdid Paule lyc,whcn he
fiid to the Corjnthians.thar he had rcceiued of the Lord that which
he had deimcred ro rhcmrFor afterward he dcclareth the thing that
he dehuered, that all without diffciece fliould communicate of both
thefigncs. IfPaulerrceuiedof the Loid,that all fhould be admitted
Vfithout difftrccerlctthcm looke of whom they haue rcceiued which
do drme away almoft all the people of God : becaufc they can not
now pretend God to be the author of it,with whom there is not yea
and nay. And yetftill for clokinge of fuch abhominations they dare
pretcndc the name of the church, and with fuch pretence defende it.
As t^^ough either thefe Antichriftes were the church , which fo ea(i-
ly treadc vndci foote,rcaitcr abroad,& deftroy the dofirinc and infti-
tuiion of Chvirt : or the Apoftolike Church were not the church , in
which the whole force of religion floriflied.
The xviij. Chapter.
of the Toviih Majflc, by vvhtchfacrtUgt the Stipper of(^hrtfi
hath not ontly bin prophantd , t/f*t alfo brought
to noH^ht.
WTth tiiefe and like inuentions Satan hath trauailed, as by
oucrfp-cadinge of darkcnefle to obfcurc and defile the
holy iuppct of Chrift>y at leaft the purenefle of it fhould
not be kc'pi ftill in the church. But the head of horrible
ahhomination was when he aduanced a SignCjby which it migSit not
onelv be darkened ond pciuerted , butbeingc vtteily blotted and a*
bohlhed ihouldc vanifiie and fall out of the remembrance of men:
namely
To Saluation. Lib.4. 5P7
namely when he blinded almoit the whole world witha moft ptfti-
lent error, th.u they Ihould btlcue that the Mafic is a facriHce and
oblation to obtcine the forgiuenes of (inncs.Howe at the beginning
the founder fort of the fcholcnrie toke this dodrine,! nothing regard:
farewell they wjch their crnbbed futteltics : which howefoeucr ihcy
may be defended with cauilling , yet are therefore to be refufcd of
all good men bccaufe they do nothing els but fpread much darkncflfe
ouer the brii^htncfi.. of the Supper.Thcrforc bidding them farcwcli,
let the readers vndei ibnde that 1 here match in fight with that opi-
nion , wherewith the Romifnc Antichrift and his Prophets hauc in-
fcftcd the whole world , namely that the Made is a workc whereby
the facrificing Pncft which ofFrcth vp Chrift , and the other that do
partake at the fame oblation,do defcrue the fauor of God : or t!\at ic
is a cicanling facnfice , whereby they reconcile God to themfclues.
Neither hath this bencrecciued ontly in common opinion of the
people, but the very doing it fclie is fo framedjthat it is a kinde of pa-
cifying wherewith farisfavf^ion is made to God for the purgin-^of
the cjuicke and dead.! he wordes alfo which they vfc,do cxprdfe the
fame:andno other thirgm.iy we i^ather of the daily vfeot it.Iknowc
howe deepe rooresthis peftilence hath taken ,vnderhowc great fc-
ming of goodnefi'e ic lurketh, howe it beareth in fnewe the name of
Chriftjhowcin the one nameof Mnlfe many btleuc that they com-
piehende the whole fummc of faith But when ir (lialbc by the word
of God moftclerelyprouiid, that this Malfejhowe much focueric
be colored and glorious, yet ihamefuUy di(honorecli Chnft, burietb
and opprcfferh his crofic, putteth his death m forgctfulnctTe , taketh
away the frutc th^t comcth thcrof vnto vs,dorh weaken anddeftroy
the Sacrament whcrin was left the memorie of his death:{hall there
then be any (o dcepe rootes, which this nioft llrong axe, I meane the
Worde of God , (hall not curt dowe and ouerthrowe ? Is there any
facefo beautifull,that this light can not bewray the euell which
lui keth vndcr it ?
a Let vstherforcfhcwc that which hath bene fet in the firft place,
that in it is intolerable blafphemie and difiionor done to Chrift. For
he was confccratc of his Father a Pricft and Bidiop ,not for a time Hcbr.f.
as we reade that they were ordeined in the olde tefiament,whocs hfc 5* & 7»
being mortail their pricfthode alfo could not be immorta|l;for which J i^'^
caufe alfo there needed fucccllors that fhould from time to time be n*
put in the place of them that dicd.But in place of Chrift,wbich is im-
niortall, there ncedcth no vicar to be fet after him.Thercfore he was pp --
i)rdeined of the Father a priefl for eucr , according to the order of 44. *
Cap. 1 8. Of the outwarde meancs
Mclchifcdcch , that he fhoulde execute an euerbftmg priefthodc,
Ccn.14. This mif^eric had bine long before figured in Melchifedcch , whom
■•• when the Scripture had ones brought in for the prieft of the liuing
Godjitncucrafterwardcmade mennon of him, as though he had
had no cnde of his life. After this point of hkcneflcjC hrilt was called
a pricft according to his order. Nowe they that do daily ficrifice,
muft nccdes appoint priefts to make the oblations , whom they muft
appoint as it were fucccflbrs & vicars m the ftcede of ChriilBy which
putting in fteedc of him, they do not onely fpoilc Chriit of his ho-
nor, and plucke from him the prerogatiuc of etcrnall priefthode,buc
alfo trauaile to thruft him downe from the nghc handc of his Father,
on which he can not iit immortall , but that he mi.ft therewithal! re-
maine the ctcrnall prictt. Neither let them lay for thcmfelues , that
their pety facrificers are not put in place of Chrift as if he were dead,
but onely are helpers of his eternall pricrthod , which ceafTeth not
therefore to continue. For they are more lirongly holdcn faft with
Hebr.7. the wordes of the Apoftle , than that they may fo efcape : namely,
I J. that there were many other ptiefts made,b?caufc they were by death
letted to continue. Therefore there is but one chat is not letted by
death,and he needeth no copanions. Yet,fuch is their frowardnefle,
they armethemfclues with the example of Mcichifedech to defend
their wickcdneflc.For, becaufc it is faid that he offred bread & wine,
they gather that he was 2 forc{hewing of their Mafle : as though the
likcneflc betwcene him and Chrift were in the offring of bread and
wine. Which is fo emptie and trifling that it needeth no cofutation,
Melchifedcch gaue bread and wine to Abraham and his companies,
to refre(hc them being weary after their iorney and bait;jih What is
this to a facrificcPMofes praifcth the gentlenelTc of the holy king:there
fellowcs ynfeafonably coinc a mifterie whereof na mention is madci
Yet they deceitfully paint their error with an other color , becaufc it
followcth by and by after , And he was the prieft of the hieft God.
I aunfwcre , that they wrongfully drawc to the bread and wine that
Hcbr.7. which the Apoftle referreth to the bleffing. Therefore when he was
7. the pricft of God he bleflfed Abraham. Wherupon the fame Apoftle
(than whom we needc to fckc no better expofitor) gathereih his ex-
cellence, becaufc the leflcr is blcfted of the greater. But if the obla-
tion of Melchifedcch were a figure of the facrihce of the Malfe,
would the Apoftlc>I pray you,which fearchcth out all cuen the leaft
things,haue forgotten fo earneft & weightie a thing? Nov/e (howe-'
focuer they trifle) they ftiallin vaine go about to ouerihrowe the rea-
fon which the Apoftle himfelfc bringeth,that the right and honoc of
1 factifH
To Saluation. Lib4. 59 8
facrificingpricfthodeceaffcth among mortjll mcn,bccaurc Chrift
which is Jtryjiorcall.is the oncly and pcrpetuall facrificing pricft.
^ An other vertue of thcMairewaSjthatitopprefl'cthand bu-
rieththecrofleand paflion of Chrift. This verily )smoftcertainC| "c'*'''^
that the crolfe of Chrift is ouerchrowcn fofone as the altar is fetvp.
For if he offred himfelfe for a facrifice vpon the crolfe^that he might
fandihc vs forcuer.and purchafe to v$ eternall redemption: vn-
douicdly the force and eft'cdtualnefle of that facrjHcc coniinucth
without any ende.Ocherwifc we fhould thinke nothing more hono-
rably of Chrift, than of oxen and calues which were facrihccd vndcr
the lawe : the ofiringes v/hercof are proucd vnefFcduall and wcalcc
by this that they were oft renued. Whcrfore either we muft confclTc,
that the facrifice of Chrift,which he fulfilled vppon the crofle, watcd
the force of eternall cleanfing, or thaj Chrift harh madeanendcof
all with one facnfice ones for euer. This is it that the Apoftlc faith, Hebr,9u
that thischicfc BilhopChaiionesapperedbyoffnngvp of himfelfe ^^''^d
before the ending of the world,tothedriijing away of finne.Againe, **^*°*
That w&arc fandificdby the will of Godjby the cftring of the body
of lefus Chrift ones. Againe^That Chrift with one oblation for euer
hath made perfed them that arc fandified : wherunto he adioinccii
a notable fentece that forjzcucneflTe of linnes being ones purchaccd,''
there remaineth no more any oblation.Thrs alfo Chrift fignificd by
bis laft faying and vrtercd among his laft gafpings, when he faid.lt is loh.i^
ended. We are wont to nore tlie laft fayings of men when they are *5>«
dieng , for oracles. Chnfi dieng teftifieth that by his one facrihcc is
perfited & fulfilled whatfoeuer was for our faluatio.Shall it be lawfull
for vs daily to patch innumerable facrifices to fuch a facrifice, (the
perfedion whereof he hath fo fhiningly fet forth) as though it were
vnperfcd.^ When the holy word of God not oncly aftirmeth,but alfo
crieth outjand proteftcth, that this facrifice was ones fully done that
the force thereof remaineth euerlafting : whofo require an other fa-
crifice,do they not accufethis of imperfcdion and wcafccnefl'e ? But
as for the Malfe , which liath bene dcliuered in fuch fort that there
may euery d;iy be made a hundred thoufand facrifices , to whatcndc
tendcth it, but that jhe pailion of Chrift , whereby he ofFrcd him an
Qnely facrificcd oblatio to the Father,fliould ly buried and drowned?
Who.vnlt fte he be bliijdc, can not fee that it was y boldncs of Satan
which wraftled againft fo open and clerc truth ? Neither am I igno-
rant with what deccites that Father of lying vfeihto color this his
fraude, faying that there are not fondry nor diuerfc racrifices,but thac
Qne fclfjs fame facnijce is repeted. But fuch fmokes are cafily blowcn
Cap.i 8. Of the outward mcancs
away.For in the whole difcourfe the Apottle trauailcth to proue:not
only that there arc no other facrificeSjbut that that one r^ciifice was
once offred vp,and fliall no more be repeated.The futctller men do
yet flip our at a narrower hole , laying that it is not a repeating but an
applying. But this Sophifticall argument alfo is no lefie eafily confu-
ted. For neither did Chrift once ofTcr vp himfclfc with this condi*
tion, that hisfacrifice ihoulde be daily confirmed with ncwe oblati-
ons : but that by the preaching of the Gofpeljand miniftring of the
holy Supper, the fiute thereof flioulde be communicated vnto vs.
i.Cor.5 So Paul faith that Chrift ourPaflcouer wasoftled vp,and biddeth v$
7« lo cate of him. This ( 1 fay) is the meanc whereby the Sacrifice of the
CrofTc is rightly applied to vs.when it is communicated to vs to take
chc vfe of ic,and we with true faith receiuc it.
4 But it IS worth ihc labour to hearc , with what other fundarion
befidc thefe they vpholde the facrificc of the Maflc. For they draw
lilal.i.S to this purpofe the prophecy of Malachic,whereby thcLorde nro-
mifeth that the time fhall come when throughout the whole world
there flialbe offered to his name incenfe and a cleanc facrifice . As
though it were a new or vnwonted thing among the Prophets,wheii
they fpcake of the calling of the Gentils to erpreflTc by the outward
ceremony of the law the fpiritual worftiipping of God,to which they
exhort lhe:that they might the more familiarly declare to y men of
their agc,that the Gcntils (hould be called into the true felowlhip of
religion. Like as alfo they arc wont altogether to defcribe by figures
of their iavv,the iructh that was deliucred by the Gofpell. So they fct
Xo«l a. ^or turning to the Lord, afcendinge into Ierufalera:for the worlhip-
*9. ping ofGodjthcoftering of all kind cs of giftesjfor larger knowledge
of him which was to be giuen to the fay thfull in the kingdome of
Chrift, dreamcs and vifions. That therefore which they alleagc , is
Era. 1$, ]i}5£ yjjtQ a,^ other prophecy of Efay, where the Prophet foretclleth
** of three altars to be fet vp in AHiria, -^gipt, & lury. For firft I aske,
whether they do not graunt that the fulfilling of this prophecy is ia
the kingdome of Chrift. Secondly, where be thcfe altars, or when
they were euer fette vp. Thirdly whether they thinke that to euery
feuerall kingdome is appointed a fcuerall temple , fuch as war- th.n at
Icrufalcm. Thefcthingesifthey wcy, I thinke they will confcffc,
that the Prophet vnder figures agreeable with his time, propheneth
ofthefpiritualJ wordiipof God to be fprcad abrond into the whole
worlde. Which we giue to them for a folution. But of this thing fith
there do cucry where examples commonly offer themftlues, I will
not buiie my felfe in longer rehearfall of thcnir Hovvbcic herein alfo
ihcy
To Saluation. Lib.4. 59P
they arc mifcrably deccincd , that they acknowledge no facrificc but
of the MafFe, whereas in dcedc the faithfull donowc facnfice to the
Lordc,& do offer a clcanc off. ing,of which ihalbe (f oken by and by.
^ Nowc I come downe to the third office of the Maflfc , where
Inuift declare howe it blotteth out the true andonely death of
C h rift, and iTiakcth itout of the remembrance ofmennc. For at
among men the ftrength of a teftament hangcth vppon the death o£
the rcftator : fo ahb our Lorde hath with his death confirmed the te-
ftament whereby he hath gcuen vs forgtucnclfo of finne* & ctcrnall
rightcou (heflc. They that dare varie or make newe any thing in this
tertamentjdo deny his death,and holde it as it were of no force. But
what is the Ma(rc,but a newe and altogether diucrfe teftament? For
why ? Doth not euery feuerall Mafl'e promife newe forgcuencfle of
/innes,newe purchah'ng of righteoufneflfe : Co that nowe there be (b
mapy teftamcts^as there be Malfes ? Let Chrift therfore come again^
and with an other death confirmc this teftament , or rather with in-
finite deathcs confirme innumerable tcftaments of Malfes. HaucI
not therfore fiid true at the beR;innmg, that the only and true death
of Chrirt is blotted out by Maffes? Yea what ihall wc fay of this that
the Maifc diredly tendeih to this cndc , that if it be pofliblc, Chrift
fnould be flaincagaincj'For where is a teftament (faycth the Apoftlc) Hcb.^-
there of necellitie muft be the death of the tcftator. The Mafic fhc- '*•
wctli it felfe to be a new teftament of Chrift : therefore it recjuireth
his der,t!i. Moreouer the hofte which is offred , muft neceflarily be
fliineand facrificcd. If Chrift in euery feuerall Maflebc facrificed,
then he muft at euery moment be in a thoufand places cruelly flaine.
Tliiiisnot mmcjbutthe Apoftles argument. If he had needed to
offer himfel'/c ofte, he muft ofrc haue died fins the beginning of the
world. I knowe that they haue an aunfwere in redinefle, whereby alio
they charge vs with Iclader-For they fay that that is obiedted againft
them which c!^.ey neuer thoughtjnor yet cannc. And we knowc,that
the death & life of Chrift is not in their hande.We loke not whether
they go about to (<ill him : onely our purpofe is to fhc we,what manec
of abfurdity followeth of their vngodly and wicked dodrine.WhicK
relle ihing f proue by the Apoftles owne mouth. Though they crie
out to the contiarie a hundred times , that this facrificc is vnt^ody:
I will deny that it han^eth vpon the will of men,that facrifices ftiould
change their nature , for by this meanc the holy and inuiolable or-
dmancc of God ftiould faile.Wherupon followeth that thisis a fure
principle of the ApoftIe,thnt there is required fticdingofbIood«tbac
wailung may not be warning.
Cap. 1 8. Of the outward meanes
6 Nowc is the fourth office ot the MafT;: to be pntrcased of^
namely to take away from vs the truic that came to vs c^the death
of Chrift, whiic'it maketh vsnot to acknowledge it and rhinke vpcn
it.For who can call to mind that he is redemcd by y death of Chnll
when he fecth a newe redemption m the Mafi'e ? Who can truft that
finncsarc forsjeuen him.vvhen he feeth a newe foraeucneOerNnCi.cr
fhall he cfcnpe tliat fhall fay , that we do for no o:hcr caufe cbteinc
forgcuenefle of finnes in the Ma{re,but becaufe it is already pur-
chafed by the death of Chrift. For he bringeth nothing els than as
if he (hould boft , that Chrift hath redemcd vs with this condition
that we (hould redcme our felues.For fuch dodrinc hath bene fpred
by the minifters of Satan , and fuch at this day they mainteine wjth
cryings out , with fwerd and fier , that we when ui the Maftc we offer
vp Chrift to his FaFl>cr,by this worke of offVing do obteine forgeue-
neflfcof bnnes,and are made partakers of the paftio of Chrift. VVi>aC
nowc rcmaineth to the paffion of Chrift, but to be anexampkof
redempti6,whereby wc may learne to be our owne redcmersPChrift
himfelfc , when in the Supper he fealeth the confidence of pardon,
doth not bid bis difciplcs to fticke in that doings, but fendeth them
away to*he facrifice of his death : lignifying that the Supper is a mo-
nimcnt or memoriall (as the common fpech is) whereby they may
Icarnc that the fatisfadoric denfing facrifice , by which the Father
was to be appeafed,muft haue bene offred but ones. For neither is it
enough to know that Chrift is the onely facrifice & vnlciTe the onely
facrificing be ioined with it , that our faith may be fattened to ius
•rolTe.
7 Nowc I come to the conclulion, namely that the holy Supper,
in which the Lordc had left the remembrance of his pafTion grauen
and cxprefied, is by the fetting vp of the Mafl'e.takcn away,dcfaced,
and deftroyed. For the Supper it felfc is the gift of God, which was
to be recciued with thankefgeuing. The facrifice of the Maflc is fa-
med to pay a price to God , which he may receiuc for fatisfadion.
Howe much difterencc there is betweene to geue »nd to rcceiue * fo
much doth the facrifice differ from the Sacran-.ec of the Supper. And
this trucly is the moft wretched vnthankfulncUe of man , that where
thcls^geife of Gods bounde ought to haue bene acknowlcdged,and
thankes to be geucn,therein he maketh God his dctror.The Sacra-
ment promifcd , that by the death of Chrift wc arc not onely ones
reftored into life , but are continually quickncd , becaufe then sll the
partes of our faluation were fulfilled. The facnficeof the MafTc
tingcth a farrc other fong,that Chrift muft be daily facrificcd,that he
may
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 6o:>
may fbmwhat profit vs. The Supper fhould hauc bene diftributcd in
the common aflcmblie of the Church , that it might cnforme vsof
tl\c communion whereby wc all cleaue together in Chrift Icfus.The
facriHce of the Mafic dillolueth and plucketh m fonder this commu-
nitie.For after that the error grewe in force, that there muft be facri-
ficers that (hould facriHce for the pcopie,the Supper of the Lordc as
though it were ported oucr to tiiem , cefied to be communicated to
the congregation of the faithfuil according; to the commaundemcnc
of the Lorde. An en trie was made open to priuatcMaflcs, which
might rather rcfemblc a certaine excommunication , than that fame
communitie ordcined of the Lorde , when the pery facrificer wiUing
feucrally by him felfe to deuourc his facrifice,doth fcuer himfclfc fro
the whole people of the faithfuil. I call priuate Maflc (Icaft any man
be decciued) whcrefoeuer there is no partaking of the Lordes Sup-
per among the faithfuil , although othcrwifc a great multitude of
men be prefenr.
8 And whsnfe the very name of Maflc firft fprongj could neucr
certainly judge : fauing thai it feemeth to me likely that it was taken
of the oftrings that were geucn. Whereupon the olde writers vfeic
commonly in the plurall number. But , to Icaue ftnuing about the
name , 1 fay that priuate Mafies are diredly againft the ordinance of
Chriftjand therefore they arc a wicked prophaningof the holy Sup-
per. For what hath the Lord commaunded vs? not to takc,and diuidc
it among vsr'What mancr of obferuing of the commaundement doth
Paul teach? not the breaking of breadjwhich is the c5mtinion of the » Cor.
body and blood:* Therefore when one takech it without diftributing, *^*^^
what Iikcnefle is there?But that fame one man doth it in the name of
the whole Church. By what commaundement ? Is not tliis openly to
mocke God, when one man priua^ly takcth to him felfe that which
oui^ht not to haue bene done bur amog many?But bccaufe the words
of Chnft and Paule are plaine enough,wemay brefely c6cludc,chat
wherfoeuer is not breaking of bread co the comunion of the faithful,
there is not the Supper of the Lord,but a falfe and wrongful counter-
faiting of the Suppcr.But a falle count crfaiting is a corrupting.Nowe
the corrupting of fo great a miftcrie is not without wickedncflc.
Therefore m priuate Mnflfes is a wickv.'d abufe. And (as one fault in
religion from lime to time bredeth an other) after that thatraanei:
of oftVing without comunion was ones crept in, by litle and litle they
beganne in eucry corner of Churches to make innumerable MafTes,
anddiuerflytodrawe the people hether and thetber, which f/iould
haue come together into one A&mhly yf they might reknowledge the
Cap.i 8. Of the outwarde meanes
inificric of their owne vnitic. Nowc let them g^o and deny it to be
ydolatrie , that in their Malles theyfnewe forth brcadto be vvor-
flipped in fteede of ChrjiiFor in vaine they boil of thole pjomifes
of the prcfence of Chrift, which howefocucr thcv be vnderftodc,
verily were not geucn to this purpofe , that wicked and prophanc
^ fnen,fo oft as they will, and to whatfocuer abufc ihcy iift, may make
the body of Chnft : but that the faicKfull,when with religious obfcr-
uation thcv do in Celebrating of the Supper followe the commaiirv-
demcnt of Chrift,niay cnioy the true partaking of him.
9 Bcfide thaCjthis peruerfnes was vnkno wen to y purer Church.
Forhowfoeiierthc more fhameleffe fort among our aduerfarics do
here go about to diguifc the matter with fslfe colors, yet ins mod
furcthat all antiquitieis againft them, as we haue afore proued in
other things, and it may more ceneinly be iudged by the coiitinuall
reding of olde writers. But ere I make an cndc of fpeakinge of it,I
t.Sam. afke our Mailing dodors , iith they knowe that obedience is more
itf.ai. cllecmedof God than oblations , and that he morerct)uireih that
his voice be barkened to , than that facrifices be cffrcd : howe they
beleue that this mancr of facriiicing is acceptable to God , whereof
they hauc nocertaine commaundcment, and wiiich tiiey fee not to
be allowed by any one fiUable of the Scripiure.Moreouer when they
heare the Apoftle fay, that no man taketh to himfeifc the name and
honor of facnficing piiefthodc, but he that is called as Aaron waj:
yea & that Ciinft himfeifc did not thruft in him(ilfc,bui obcicdthc
calhng of his Father : either they muft bring forth God the author
and ordeiner of their facrificing priefthode, or the y muii cofeile that
the honor is not of God, into which they baue with wicked rafhnes
broken in vncalied. But they can not {licwe one title of a letter that
mainteineth their facrificing priefthod. Why thcrfore (haJl not their
facrifices vanilh away,which can not be offrcd without a pricft ?
\o If any man do thruft in fhort fentences of the olde wi iters ga-
thered hert and there , and do by their authoritie trau:;ill to prouc
that the facnfice which is done in the Supper is fa' re otherwife to be
▼ndcrftanded thanwcdoexpoundc it: let him be brefly aunfwered
thus : if the queftion be oF allowing the forged dcuife of facrifice,
fuch as the Papiftcs hauc fainedinthe MalTe, the olde writers do
ncucr fpeake in defcnfc of (uch facnlegc. They do in dcrede vfe the
word Sacrifice: but therewithal! they expounde ,that they m^anc
lib io. nothirtg els but the remembrance of that true and onely Sacrifice,
contra, ^hich Chrift our oncIy facrificing pricft (as they eche where report
cap.iS. of hiip) made on the crolfe. The Hcbrues (faycth Auguttine) in the
facnfi-
To Saluation. Lib.4.. 001
facrificcs of bcaftcs which they offied to God > did cckbrace a pro-
phccie ot the facrificc to come, which Chrift offi ed : the Chriftians
do with the holy oblation and pavtaking oi ihe body of ChriA cele-
brate a remembrance of ihcfaciificc already made Hereveiilyhe
tcachcih altogether the fame thing, which is wnttc in moe words in
the boke of faith, to Peter the Deacon , wholociicr be the aothot of
it.The woids be thcfc,Bfloue moft flcedfaftly nrd do ut not at alljthat
the oncly begotten himtclfc,beini; madciiefhe for •.s,oflicd himielfc
for vs a faci iScc and oblation to God into a fauor of Iwetcneire : to
whom with the Father and il'cHol) Ghofl in the tmie ofthcoldc
ttitamcnt beaftcs were facriticcd:and to whom nowc- with the Father
and the Holy Ghoft( with whom he hath one Godiicd) the holy
Church througho'Jt v whole world ceficfh not to oftei the facriticc
of bred and wine.For in thofe ficfiily facrifices was a figuring of rhc
flcflie of Chiift which he Ihoiild offer for our finnc^.ana of his blood
which he (hould (hed to the forgcucnes of (inncsBiit in this facnficc
is ttiankcfgeuing and rchcarfallof the fleihe of Chrift which he of-
fered for vs, and of his blood which the fame he hath Hied for vs.
Whereupon Auguftinc himlelfe in many places cxpoundeth it to be Conrra
fiothingtls but a facrificcof praife.Finally you (liallcomonly ^iide zducxi.
in him, that the Supper of the Lordc is for no other rcafon called a ^^g'^
fr^cnficcbut bccaufe it is the remembraccjimnge,3nd witneffc of that
fingular,true, and onely facrifice whqfewithChuft hath tlcanfed vs.
A\io there is a notable place m his fourth boke of the Tnnitic the
xxiiij. Chapter , where after that he hath difcoiirfed of the onely fa-
crifice,he thus concludeth:becaufe in a facrifice fower things arc co-
fideredjto whom it is ofiied,&: of whom.what is ofi'red,& for whom.
The fame hehiimfclfcihe one and true mediator reconciling vs to
God by the facrifice of peace , remaincth one with him to w^om he
offred : makcth them one in him for whom he oftred:is one himklfe
which oftred , and the thing which he offred. To the lame effect alfo
fpeaketh Chriloflomc.But they fochalcngc the honor of facrificin^
pritlHiodc to Chrift.that Auguf^meteftifiethitto bey voice of Ap^Libr. 2-
tichriit if any man make a Billiop interccft'or bctwene God and men. '^'^""^
II Yet do wc not deny but that the ofliingvp of Chrifl is there cap.g,
fo flicwed in vs,that the fpedacle of the crofl'e is in a mantr fet be-
fore our eyes.-as y Apoftle faith that Chrifl was crucified in the eyes
of the Galathians , when the preaching of the crofTe was fct before Gal. 5.1,
ihem.But forafmuch as I fe that thofe olde Father* alfo wrdicd this
remembrance an other way than Vvas agrc.ible with the inftitution of
the Lordc (bccaafc their Supper conccined I wote nor what repeiei
GGGG
Cap.iS. Of thcoutwardc mcancs
or at Icaft renewed forme of racrificing)the fafeft way for godly hartcs
ihaibc to reft in the pure and fimple ordinance of God : whoes alio
the Supper is therfore called,becaufc in it his authority alone ought
to be in force.Trucly fith I finde that they haue kepte a godly & true
(enfc of this whole mifteric, and I do notperceiuc that they mcantc
to abate any thing were it neuer fo htle from the only facfifice of the
Lord,I can not codemne them of vngodlineflctyet I thinke that they
can not be cxcufed,but that they haue offended fomwhat in y mancr
of the celebration. For they counterfaited the lewifhe maner of fa-
cri'ncing more nerely than either Chrift had ordeined,or the nature
of the Gofpell did bcarc. Therefore that fame ouerthwart appliance
to heaueniy things is the onely thing wherein a man may worthily
blame them/or that being not cotented with the (imple and naturall
inftitutionof Chri{\,they fwaruedtoihc fhadowes of thclawe.
11 If a man do diligently wey,that this difference is put by the
word of the Lorde bet wene the facriiices of Mofes , and our Than-
kefgcuing, that whereas thofe did reprefent to the lewifhe people,
the fame effedualnefTe of the death of Chrift,which is at this day de-
liuered to vs in the Supper , yet the mancr of rcprefcntmgc was di*
ucrfe.For in thofc,y Leuiticall Pricfts were comaunded to figure that
v/hich Chrift fhould performe : there was brought a facrificc which
fhould be in the fleede of Chrirt himfelf:therc was an altar whcrupo
it fliould be offrcd : Finally all ^ings were fo done,th3t there was fee
before their eyes an imai;e of the facrificc which was to be offred to
God for a fatisfadorie cleanfing.But fins the time that the facrificc is
ended , the Lorde hath apointcd to vs an other order : namely that
it fhould coucy to the faithfull people the frute of the facrificc offred
to him by the Sonne. Therfore he hath geuen vs a table whereat we
fhould eate,not an altar whcrupon facrificc fhould be offredrhe hath
not cofecratcd priefls to facrificc, but miniflers to diflribute the holy
banket. Howe much more hy and holy the mifterie is,fo much more
religioufl/ and with greater reuerecc it is mete to be handled. Ther-
fore there is no way fafer,than putting away all boldncfTe of mas vn-
derfltanding, to fticke fafl in that alone which the Scripture teacheth.
And tiuely if we colder that it is y Supper of the Lotd & not of men,
there is no caufe why we fhould fuffer our felues to be remoued one
heare bredth fro it by any authority of men or prefcription of ycres.
Therfore when y Apofile minded to clcanfe it from all faultes which
had already crept into the church of the Corinthias,he vfeth the rc-
dicft vvav therunto,that is, he calleth it backe to the only inflitution
of itjfrom whcnfc he fheweth y a perpctuallrule ought to be fetched
ij Nowc
To Saluation. Lib4, ^02
1 5 Nowc leaft any wrangler flioiild ftirrc vs vp ftrifc by rcafon
of Che names of facriHce and facrificing prici}, I will alfo declare, buc
yet brefclvj what in tlie whole dilcourle I liauc meant by a (acnfice,
and v/hatby a Sacrificing prieft.Whofo ftrctche the word facnfice to
all holy Ceremonies and doings of religion , 1 fc not by what reafon
ihcy do ir. We do knowc that by the concinuall vfe ot the Scripture >
a fact ificc is called that which the Grekes call fomtime Thu(ja,fome-
time Profphorajfomtime Telete. Which being generally taken com-
prchendcch vvhatfocueris in any wifeoftlcd to God. Wherefore wc
muft make diftindion: but yet fothutihis diftindtion niayhauea
fupcrnall appliance of finulitude from the facrificcs of the lavveof
Mofes : vnder the lliadowes whereof the Lorde willed to reprefenc
to his people the whole truth of facrificei. Of thofe although there
were diuerfe formes, yet they may all be referred to two foi tes. For
cither there was oblation made for iianeaffrr acertainemaner of
fatisfadion, whereby giitinefle was rcdcmcd before God : or it was a
(igne of the worfhipping of God, and a tclbfying of religi6:fomtimc
in ftcede of fupplication,to craue the fauor cii"God:iomnmc in ihcdc
of thankergcuing,to teftifir thankfulnefll ofminde for benehtcs re-
ceiued : fomtime onely for an exercife of godlinefle ,to renewc the
ftabliihinge of the couenant:to which latter fort pcrteined burnt of-
fringSjdrmke oftVmgSjOblatioSjfirft fi iJtes,3nd peace oftrings.Wherc-
fore let vs alfo diuideours into two kindcs: and for tcachinges fake
let vs call the one the facrificc of wotfliip and of godly deuonon,
becaufe it confilkth in the honoring and worfhipping of God, which
the faithful! both owe and yelde vnto him:or,if you will.the facrifice
of Thankefjcuing : forafmuch as it is ocuen to God of none but o£
ihem the being lode n with immcafurable bcncntes,do render to him
themfelues with all their doinges.Thc other m.-y be called propitia-'
toric or of expiation.The facrifice of expiation is that which tendcth
to appeafe the wrath of God,to fatisfic his !udgement,and fo to wafh
and wipe away finncs : whereby the (inner clcanfcd horn ihc hithy
fpottes of them and rertored into puritie of righteoufneffe, may re-
turnc into fauor with God himfelfe. So in the lawe thofe were called Exo.i^
facrifices that were offred for the purging of hunjsinor for that they i^'
were fuflficient to recouer the fauor of God , or to put away iniquiiie:
but for that they fhadowcd out fuch a true facrifice which at length
was fully done by Chnft alone : & by him alone , becaufe it could be
done by none othcriand ones,becaufe the cffedualneffe and force of
that one facrifice which Chrilt hath fully done,is eccrnall,as he him- ioh.t>
felf hath teftificd with his own mouth, whe he faidy it was ended & jo.
GGGG ij
Cap.iS. Ofthe outwardemcancs
fulhlled : that is to fay , that whatfocucr was ncceflaric to the recon*
cihng of the Fathers fauor , to the obceining of the fbrgcucncflc of
(innes.to righteoufneiTe and to faIuation,all the fame was performed
and fulhlled with that his onely obktio.and there fo nothing wanted
thereof, that there was afterward no place lefc to any other facrificc.
14 Wherefore I determine , that it is a moft wicked reproch,
and blafphemy not to be fuffied , as well againft Chrift as againft the
facrifice which he hath fully done by his death vpon the croffe for v$,
if any man by renewmge an oblation thinke to purchacc the pardon
of linncSjto appeafe God,and to obtcine rightcoufhefife.But what is
els done by MalTing,but that by defcruing ofncwc oblation we may
be made partakers ofthe paffion of Chrill.^' And,that there might be
no meafure of madding, they thought it but a fmal thing to fay that
there is made indifferently a comon facrificc forthe whole Church,
vnlefle they fui ther faid that it is in their choiie to apply it peculiarly
to this man or that man to whom they would, or rather to cucry one
whofocuer he were that would buy for himfelfc fuch ware with rcdy
money.Kowt becaufe they could not rcachc to the price that ludas
had, yet that they might in fome marke rcfemble their author, they
"H^c CO kepte the likeneffe of number. ludas foldc him for thirty (iluer pens:
f^«" thefe fellowes fell him , after the French accompt , for xxx. brafen
P^'^*^ pens : but ludas foldc him oncSjthefe fellowes fell him as oft as they
Tiaflein ^^^ ^"^^ ^ hici[. In this fence alfo wc deny that they be facrificing
ft junce piielts, chat is to fay t they that wirh fuch an oblation are mcancs to
is. 3.Ka God for the people, they that appealing God, may purchacc the fa-
^^'h^'h ^^^^^-^^^^^ P"''g'"§ of finnes. For Chrift is the oncly Bifhop and fa-
make, crificmg pneft ofthe newc Tcftamet, into whom all Priefthodes are
:o. de. rcmoued,andin whomcthey befhut vp and ended. And if the Scrip-
n'trs , turc had made no mention cf the eternall Priefthodc of Chrift : yet
about forasmuch as God , fins that he hath taken away thofe oldc Pricft-
iut oTa I'Jo^cSyhath ordcined none,the Apcftlcs argument remaineth inuin-
Icrlinq <^'ble , ihnt no man taketh honor to himfelfe but he that is called of
^rote. God. By vvh.1t affiance therefore dare tbefc robbers of God,that boft
^tbr.5, themfclues for the butchers of Chrift,call themfclucs the facrificing
Priefts ofthe isiiing God? «
I f Plato hath an exctHent place in his feconde boke of Comon
v/eale. Where when hccntrcatcth of the oldemancrsof expiation,
and laughtth to fcorne the foohftie cofidence of euill men & wicked
doers, which thought that their wicked doines were by thefe as by
coucringes hidden chat the gods could not fc them,and did,as if they
had gotten warrant ofthe gods by couenant , more carekfly folowc
their
V
' To Saluation. Lib.4. ^03
their ownc luftcs : he fecmeth throughly to touchc the maner of fa-
tisfadorie purging of the Mafic , fuch as is ac this day in tlic world.
To beguile and vndermine an other man, all men knowc to be vn-
lawfull. To grcue vvidowes with wrongful dealings, to lobbc the fa-
thcrleflc, to troble the poorc , by euill crafty meanes to catch other
mens goods to thcmfelues , with forfwcrings and dcceites to enter
forceably into any mans pofltirions , to oppreflc any man with vio-
lence and tyrannous fcarc,all men cofefie to be wicked. Howe there-
fore dare fo many commonly do all ihefc thinges , as though they
ihould freely be boldc to do them ? Truely ,if we rightly wey it,no
other caufe doth fo much encourage them , but bccaufe they hauc
confidence^that by the facrificc of a Ma(re,a$by paiment of full price
for rccompenfc , they ftiall fatisfie God , or at the leaft that this is an
cafy way to compounde with him. Then Plato precede th further to
fcorne their grofie blockiihneflc, which thinkethat by fuch fatif-
fadoric cleanfings thofe pcines are redemed that othcrwife they
(houldfufFerinhell. Andwhertoferucatthisday the ycrely obites,
and the greater part of Maires , but that they which throughout all
their life hauc bene moft cruell tyrantes, ormoft rauenous robbers,
or geuc foorth to all mifcheuous doings, fhould as though they were
redemed by this pricCjCfcape the ficr of purgatoneJ'
16 Vnder the other kmde of facrificc, which we haue called the
facrificc of Thankefgeuing,:ire conteined all the dutiefuli workes of
charitie,which when we extcde to our brethren, we honor the Lord
hinfelfe in his members;thcn, all our prayers,praifingcs,gcuingc£ of
thanks,and whatfoeuer we do to the worftiipping of God. All which
things finally do hang vpon the greater facrificc , whereby we are in
foule & body hallowed to be a holy temple to the Lord. For neither
is it enough,if our outward doings be apphed to the obeying of him:
but fird our felues , and then all that is ours ought to be conftcrate
and dedicate to him:that whatfoeuer is in vs, may feruc his glory, and
mayfaOorof lelous endeuorto aduanceit. This kinde of facrificc
tendeth nothing at all to appeafe the wrath of God,nothing at all to
obteine forgeuenefl'e offinnes, nothing at all to dcferue righteouf^
ncflc: but is occupied onely in magnifying and extolling of God. For
it can not be pleafant and acceptable to God > but at their handcs,
whom by forgeuenefle of finnes already receiued he harh by other
meanes reconciled to himfclfe, and therefore acquired them from
giltincfle.Butit is fo ncccffary for the Church,that it can not be away
from it.Thercfore it fhalbc euerlafting,fo long as the people of God
|5>all CQtinuc, as wc haue before ahcady Ihewcd out of the Prophet:
G G G G jij
Cap.i 8. Of the outward meanes
for in that meaning I will take this prophecie,For from the rifing of
the funne to the going downe thcrcof,great is my name among the
Gentiles, and in cucry place incenfe {halbe offred to my name,and a
cleancoffringe:becaure my name is terrible among the GetileSjfaith
Rr>ro.ia the Lorde:lo farre is it of,£hnt we would put it away. So Paul biddeth
** vs to offer our bodies , a facnfice liuing , holy, acceptable to God,a
rcafonable worOiip. Where he fpake very pithily ,when he added that
this is our reafonable worfliipping;for he meant the fpirituall maner
of worlliipping of God ,which he didfecrctely let m companfon
Hcb 1 J againrt the carn-all facrihces of the lawe of Mofes. So liberall doing
^^'[ . of good and communicating are called facrificcs by which God is
„''''"* pleafed. So the hberaliiie of chePhilippians , whereby they badre-
leued the pouertie of Paule,is called a (acrifice of fwete fmelhng.So
all the good workesof the faithfullarc called fpititualiracrifices.
I J And why do I feke out many examples? For commonly this
maner of fpeaking is often foundc in the Scriptures. Yea and while
thff people of God was yet holdenvndcr the outward fchoohngof
the law , yet the Prophets did fufficiently exprcfle, thet vndcr thofc
carnall facrifices was the truth, which theChriftian Church hath
pra.141. common with the nation of the lewes. After which maner Dauid
*• prayed, that his prayer might as incenfe afcede into the fight of God,
Oicc.i4 y^j^j Olce called geuingcs of thankes, the calues of lippcs,which in
Pfa. 51. an other place Dauidcalleth the facrificesof praife. Whom the A?
II. poitle himfdfe following , calleth them alfo the facrifices of praifc,
Hcb.13. and expoundcth them the frutes of lippcs confclling to his name.
' ^* This kinde of facrifice the Supper of the Lord can not wantrwhercin
when we declare his death and render tiiankfgeuingjwe do nothing
but offer the faciifice of praifc. Of this office of facnficing , all we
Chriftians are called a kingly Prieflhodc : becaofe by Clirift wc offer
i.Pet.a. ^o God that facrifice of praife of which the Apoftle (peakoih , the
f, frute of lippes that confelfe to his name. For neither do we with our
giftesappeareinthc fight of God without an inrcrceflbr. Chiiilis
hc^wbich being the mediator coming bctwcne, we offer vs and ours
to the Father.Ho is our BiHiopjwhich being entred into the fandua-
ry of hcauen , hath opened the entry to vs. He is the altar , vpoi)
which we lay our giftes,that in him wc may be bolde all that we arc
Reue.1. bolde. It IS he (I fay) that hath made vs a kingdom and Priefts to the
^* Father.
18 What rcmaincth , but that the blinde may fc,thc dcffe may
hcare,children thcmfelues may vndetfladc this abhomination of the
MaiTe^ which being offred in a golden cup , hath made dronke the
kings
To Saluation. Lib.4. ^04
kings aiid peoples of the earth , from the hieft to the lowcfV, hath fo
ftriken them with drowfinefic and giddincffe, that being become
more fenflcflcthan brute beaftes,they haue fctthc whole (hip of
their fafetic onely in this deadly deuouring gulf. Truely Satan ncuer
did bende himfelfc with a ftronger engine than this to affailc and
vanquifti the kingdome of Chrift. This is the Hclene, for whom the Quen<
enemies of the tructh fi^ht at this day with fo great rage/o great fu- ^^elcn
rioufneflc, fo great crucltie: & a Helene in dcede , with whom they *^"! j^'
fo defile themfelues with fpiritUal whordome.which is the moft cur- j^^
fed of all. I do not here fo much as ones touch with my Iitlc finger c.iufe
thofc groffe abufeSjwherwith they might color the vnholy purenefTc c^ the
of their holy Maflcthowe filthy markettings they vfchowe vnhoneft ^Xi!"'
gaines they make with their maflinj^es, with hoY«^e great raucning
they fill their couetoufncflc. Onely I do point vnto, and that with
fcwe and plaine wordes,what maner of thing is euen the very holicft
holinefTe of the Mafle/or which it hath dcfcrued in certain ages paft
to be fo honorable and to be had in fo great reucrence.For, to hauc
thefe fo great mifteries fct out according to their worthineflcjrequi*
reth a greater workc: and I am vnwilling to mingle herewith thofe
filthy vneleanneflfesthatcomonly Ihewe themfelues before the eyes
& faces of all men:y all men may vnderftand.that the MafTe taken in
her moft piked purenelfe^and wherewith it may be Cct out to the beft
(hewe,without her appendaces,from the rootc to the topp fwarmeth
full of all kinde of wickednefre,blarphemic,idolatrie,and facrilcge.
19 The Readers now hautf m a maner almoft all thofe things ga-
thered into an abridgement, which we hauc thought bchouefuU to
be knowen concerning thefe two Sacramets :the vfc of which hath
bene deliuered to the Chriftian Church from the beginning of the
ncwe teftamcntjto continue to the very cnde of the world: namely,
thatBapiifme fhouUbe as it were a certain entry into it,& an admif-
fion inro faith : & the Supper fliould be as it were a continual foodc,
wherewith Chrift fpiritually fedeth the familie of his faithfull.Wher-
forc as there is but one God , one faith , one Chrift, one Church his
body : fo there is but one Baptifme, and is not ofte miniftred againe.
But the Supper is fro time to time diftributed, that they which haue
bene ones recciued into the Church , may vnderftand that they be
continually fed with Chrift. Befide thefe two as there is no other Sa-
cramet ordeincd of God,fo neither ought the Church of the faithful
to acknowledge any other. For, that it is not a thing that lieth in the
choife of nian,to raifc & fet vp ncwe SacrametSjhe fhall eafily vndcr*
ftand y rcmebrcth chat which hath bene here before plainly enough
GGGG iiij
Cap.i 8. Of the outwarde meancs
dcclaredjthat iSjthat Sacraments are appointed of God to this cndc,
that they fhould inftiud vs of fome promife of his, and teftifie to vs
his good will cowarde vsrand he alfo that calleth to minde,that none
tra.40. },ath bene Gods counfcller, that tnight promife vs any ceitaintie of
lora.i, ^^'-^ willjor aiFure vs & bring vs out of care,what afFedion he beareth
1^, toward vs,what he will geuc,or what he will deny vs. For therewith is
alio dctcrminedjthat no man can fet fourth a figne to be a teftimonic
of any wjU or promife of his:it is he himfclf alone,that can by a fignc
gcucn teftifie to vs of himfelfe. I v/ill fpeakc it more brefely, and par-
aducnture more grofly,bu: more plainly, A Sacrament c.;nneuer be
without promife of Valuation. All men gathered on a hcape together
can of themfclues promife nothing of our (aluatio.Theriorc neither
can they of themff lues fet fourth or fet vp a Sacrament.
20 Thcrfore let the Chriftian Church be contented with thcfe
two , and let her not onely not admitt or acknowledge any third for
. the prefeiit timCjbut alfo not dciire or loke for any to the ende of the
and ^°^'^' ^^^ whereas ceriainc diuerfc Sacraments , befidc thofe their
y(;^ ordinaric ones , were geuen to the Icwes , according to the diuerfc
.Cor. courfc of times , as Manna , Water fpringing out of the rocke , the
o. 5' Brafen fcrpent and fuch other : they were by this change put ia
i'?.^*^ n^inde that they {hould not Hay vpon fuch figures , whocs ftate was
not very fteedfaft , but that they ihould loke for fome better thing
from Gocl,which (hould continue without any dccaying,and without
any ende. But we gje in a farrc other cafe, to whom Chrift is openly
(hewed tin whom all the treafuresof knowledge and wifdome are
ohn.3. hidden with fo great abundance and plentie, that either to hope for
:oI.2.3 *^f^okcfor any ncwecncreafetothefe treifurcs, is verily to moue
God to wrath, & to prouokc him againfl vs.We muft hunger for,feke,
loke vpon,learne,and throughly learne Chrift aIone,vnti!l that great
day (halt appeare,whercin the Lord Ihall openly fliewe to the full the
glory of his kingdomc,& himfelfe fuch as he is,to be beholden of vs.
Toh.3. And for this reafonthts our age is in the Scriptures figmfied by the
• h{\ hourc , the iaft dayes, the laft times, that no man Lliould dcceiue
^g " himfelfe with vaineloking for any newe doCirinc or reuelation. For
Pcc.i. ^i"*a*^y times and in many fortes he fpake before by his Prophetcs : in
3. thefe Jaft dayes the heaucniy Father hath fpokcn in his beloucd
eb.i. Sonne,which only can manifcftly ihewe the Fachcnand in decde he
hath manifeftly fncwcd him to the fu]I,fo much ss bchoueth vs,while
we nowe beholde him by a glaife. As therefore this is nowc taken
Cot away from men , that they can not make ncwe Sacramcntes in the
I.i2, Church of God:ro it were to be wiOfed,chat as litle as wcrcpoflible of
mans
To Saluation. Lib.4. 6of
mans inuention migh: be mingled with thole Sacraaicntcs that arc
of God For hke as whsn water is poured in,chc wine departech and
is dehicdrand as with lenucn Icatccred amonge it. the wholt lumpc of
doae waxerh fewer : lb the pJircneffc of the myfterics of God is no-
thing elfe but dthled when man addech any thing of his ovvnc. And
yet we fee how farrc the Sacramcntes arc fwarucd out of kmdc irom
iheir natural! purcncire,as they be hattidlcd at this day.Thcrc is ech-
where too much of pompes,ceremonicSjand gefturinges; but of the
%vof de of God in t!ic meanc time there is neitlier any confidcratioa
nor mention , without which cucn the Sacramentcs themfelues arc
not Sacr.imentes . Yea and the very ccixmonies that are ordayned
o^ God , in fo great a rout can not once iift vp their hcad,but lye as
it were opprefled. Howe htle is that (eene in Baptiime, which onely
ought there to haue fhincd and bin Jookcd vpon,as we hauc in an o-
thcr place rightfully complained , eucn Baptifme it felrc ? As for the
Suppcr,ir is vtterly buried , Gncc that it hath bin turned into y Maffe,
fatiuige that it is fecne once euery ycarc but in a mangeied and haifc
tome falliion.
The xix. Chapter.
of the fine fiilftly named Sacramentes:v vherT u declared^lhat the other fine
V vhtih hane bin hitherto contrnouly take>ifer Sacrumentts^are
not Sairameiites ; nnd thai n shewed what
maner off hinges they be.
Vr former difcourfe concerningc Sacramentes might haue
\, obtained this with the fober and willing to learnc,that they
ihould not ouer curioufly procede any f urthcr> nor (houldc
without the word of God embrace any o:her Sacramcntes
befide thofe two which they knew to be ordained of the Lordc. But
forafmuch as that opinion of the leuen SacramentSjbeing common-
ly vfcd n\ all mens tallscjiauinge wandered through allfchoolcs and
preachingesj hath by very auncienty gathered roores, and is yetftill
fettled in the mindes of me: I thought that 1 ftiould do a thing worth
the trauelljif I Ihoulde feuerally and more ncerely fearch thofe other
liur that are commonly adnumbred amonge the true and natural] Sa--
cramentes of the Lord, and wiping away alldfccitfull colour, ihould
fee the forth to be feenc of the (imple (uch as they be,& how fallcly
they haue bin hitherto taken for Sacramentes . Firft , I here proteft
to ail the godly j that I do net take in handc this contention about
the name for any dcfirc of ftriuing , but that I am by weighty caiifcs
led to Hght againii the abufeofit. I amnot ignorant chatChnftians
Cap.15^. Of the outward meanes
arc Lords,as of words/o of all things alio, &; thcrfore may at their wil
apply words to thinges, fo that a godiy feiifc be kept,although there
be ibmc vnproperncffe m the (peaking. All this 1 graunt:although ic
were better that the wordes {hould be maderubied to thinges,than
thmgcs to the words. But in the name of Sacrament there is an other
coniideracion. For they wh«ch make feucn SacramentJ'jdo thervvith-
ailgiue to them all this definition, that they be vifible formes of in-
oifible grace : they make them altogether veflklls of the holy Ghoft:
jnftrumentes ofgiuingof rightcoufncflejcaulesof the obtaininge of
grace. Yea and the Maifter of the fentcnces himfclfe dcnieth that the
Sacramcntcs of the lawe of Mofcs arc properly called by this name,
becaufe they did not deliuer in dede the thing that they figured. Is it,
I befeech you,to be fuftercd,that thofc fignes which the Lorde hatU
hallowed with his owne mouthjwhich he hath garnifhcd with excel-
lent promjfes, fhould not bc^ccompted for Sacramentesrand in the
meant time this honor iliold be coueied away to thofe vfages which
me cithcriiauc deuifed of themfelues, or at leaf^ do obferue wichqut
cxprcfle cosnmaundement ofGod?Therfore cither let them change
the dcHnition.or lee them abftaine irom the wrongfull vfinge of this
word, which doth afterward engender falfe opinions & full of abl'ur-
dity. Extreme anointinge (fay thcy)is a figure and caufe of inuiflblc
grace, becaufe ir is a Sacrament. If we ought in no wife to graunt thac
which they gather vpon it^then truely we muft refif^ the in the name
it relfe,leaft therby we admit that it may giue occafion to fuch an cr---
rouf. Againe when they would proue it to be a Sacrament,they adde.
this caufe/or that it confilteth of the outward fignc and the word. If
we finde neither commaundemcnt nor promife of ic, what can we do
clfc bat crie out againft them?
1 Nowappeareththatwebrawlenotabouty word, butdomoue
a controueriie not fuperfluous cocermng the thing itfelfe.Thcrfore
this we muft ftrongly hold faft, which we haue with inuincible rclbn
before confirmed 5 that the power toinfticutea Sacrament is in the
hande of none but of God only. For a Sacrament ought with a cer-
taine promife to raife vp and comfort the confcicnccs of the faith-
Efa. 40. full:which could neuer rcceiue this certainty from man. A Sacramec
« ?. ought to be to vs a witneflinge of the good will of God towarde v$,
Rom.ii vvhercof none of all men or Angels can be witneSiforafmuch as none
^'** hath bin of Gods counftll.Therefore it is he alone which doth wirh
right authority teftific of himfclfe to vs by his word. A Sacrament is
afealc, whercwiihthcteftamcntorpromifeof Godisfealed. Butic
could no{ be fcaled with bodily thinges & clemcntcs of this world,
vnlcffc
ToSaluation. Lib.4. ^06
vnleffc they be by the power of God framed and appointed there-
unto. Therefore man can not ordainc a Sacrament , bccauie this is
not in the power of mannc , to make that fo great mydcrics of God
iliould lye hidden vndef To bafc thinges. The word of God muft go
before , which may m£ke a Sacrament to be a Sacrament, as Augu- ^'^^'tL
ftine very well tencheth . Moieouer it is profit ible that there be kept ^"^ "'**•
fomc difference betwcne the Sacramentcs and other ceremonies, vn- /^^^ ^ ^^
leflc we will fall into many abfurditics. The Apolfles prayed kneling: 40 oao
therefore men (hall not kneeic without a Sacrament, tt is (ayd that 5*»
the difciples praied toward the Eaft: therefore the lookmgc into the ^•^''"•*
Eaft fhalbe a sacrament. Paule wiUeih men in cucry place to lift vppc
pure handes, & it is rchearfed that holy men oftentimes prayed with
their handes lifted vp:then let i he lifting vp of handes alfo be made
a Sacrament. Finally let all the geftures of the holy ones turnc into
Sacramentes. Howcbcit I wouldenotalibmuchpalle vpponthefe
thingcSj if fo that they were not ioyaed with thofe other greater dif-
commodines.
g If they will prelTe vs with the authority of the old Church, T fay
that they pretend a iahe colour. bor this number of fcuen is no where
foundc among the Eccle(infticall writersincither is it ccrtame at what
time ixfirft crept in. I grauntindedc thatfometimc ihey be very hee
in v(ing the name of a facramcnr:but whai meane they thereby?eucn
all ceremonies and outward rite^, and all excrcilcs of godlinelic. But
when they fpcake of thofe (ignes , that ought ro be wirnefles oi the
grace of God toward vSjthey arc contented wifh ihefe two,Baptifme,
and the Supper. Leaft any man Ihouldc ihinke that I falfciy boaft of
thiSjI will here rehearfe a few teftimonies of Auguftinc.To laauarius gpf.^*
he fayth Fiift. I would haue thee to hold faft that which is the chtcfe
point of tRis difputation,that our Lord Chriit(as he himfelfe fayth in
the GofpeU)hath made vsfubiedtoalightyoke and a light burden.
Wherefore he hath bound together the fclovvflnp of the new people
with Sacramentcs very fcvveinnumbcr,vcry eafic in obfcruinge,very
excellent in ii^nification. As are Baptifmc hallowed in the name of the
TrinitYjand the Communicating cf the body and blood of the Lord,
and whaifoeuer elfc is fctte foorth in the Canonicail Scriptures, A-
gainc, in his bookc of Chriftian dodrinc. Since the Lordes rcfurre- ' *^*
?tion, the Lorde himfelfe and the dodrine of the Apoftles hath de-
li uered certaine few fignes in fteede of many, and thofe moft ealic to
be done, moft reuerende in vndciftandinge, molt pure in obferuing:
as is Baptifme , and the Celcbratingc of the body and blood of the
Lord.VVUy doth he here make no mention of the holy number,thac
Cap.ip. Of the outward meancs
i$ ,of the number offeuen ? Is it likely that he would hauc pafled it
oucr,if it had bin at chat time ordained in the Church, fpecs ally fith
be IS othcrwifc in obfcruinge of numbres more curious than necdc
were ?Yc3,whcn he nameth Baptifmc and the Supper,and fpcaketh
nothinge of the reft:doch he not fufficiendy figniiic, that thefe two
myfterics do excel! in fingular dignity , & that the other ceremonies
do reft beneth in a lower degree ? Wherfore I fay that thei'e Sacra-
mentaric Dodors are dcftitutc not onely of th e worde of the Lord,
but alfo of the confent of the oldc Church, howc much foeucr they
glory of this pretence. But nowe Icttc vs come do wne to the IpeciaU
things thcmfelucs.
. OfCotifirmatiott.
4 This was the mancr in olde time, that the children of Chrifti-
ansjwhen they were growen to age of difcrction,ihould be brought
before the Bilhop : that they fhoulde fulfil that ducty which was rc-
<juired of thofe that being growen in yeares did offer themfelues to
Baptifme , For thefe fate J^ongc thofe that were to be catechifed,
till beinge fully inftruded in the myilcries of the faith » they couldc
make a confeition of their faith before the Bilhop and the people.
Therefore they that were baptifcd being infantcs,becaufe they ha4
not then made conftflion of their faith before the Church,wcre a-
bout the end of their childhoode or in the beginning of their yeres
ofdifcretion prcfcnted againe by their parentes, and were exami*
ned of the Bifnop according to the forme of the Catcchifme, which
they had then certainc and common. And that this doing.which o-
iherwifc ought worthily to be grauc and holy , might haue the more
reucronce and dignity ,thcrc was added alfo the Ceremony of laying
on of handcs. So that fame chjlde , his faith beinge allowed , was let
go with folemnc bleffing. The olde wryters do oft make mention of
this maner. Leo the Pope wryteth : If any rciurne from hcrctikcs,lcc
ipj,j^, him notbebaptiredagiine:buc(which he wanted amongethe Herc-
tikc5)let the vertue of the Spirite be giuen him by the Biihops laying
onof hishandes. Here our aduerfaries will eric out, that it is right-
fully called a Sacrament , in which the holy Ghoft is giuen, but Leo
himfelfc doth in an other place declare what he mcanethby thofe
^P» 77« wordsrWho fo(fnith he)is baptifed amonge hcrerikes, let him not be
rebaptifedjbut with calling vpon the holy Gho{l,lct him be confirmed
with laying on of iiandscbecaufe he receiued only the forme of bap-
tifme without fandifying.Hierom alfo maketh mention of it,wry ting
againft the Luciferias. But although I do not deny that Hieron-j fom-
what crrcth therein , for chat be fay th chat it is an cbfcruation of the
Apoitlei?
To Saluation. Lib.4. ^07
ApofHcs:ycthc is n)oft farrc from thcfc mens follies. And the very
fame alfo he qualifieth,when he addcth.that this blefling is giuen to
the bifliops onely , rather in honor of their priefthoode than by the
necefficy of law. Therefore fuch laying on of handcs,which is done
Cmply in ftcde of blefling, I praife and would that it were at this day
rcftored to the pure vfe thereof.
5 Cut the iaccr age hauingc in a mancr blotted out the thingc it
fclfe, hath fet I wotc not what fained confirmation for a Sacrament
of God.They hauc fained that the vcrtuc of Co/irmation is.to giuc
the holy Ghoft to the cncreafe of Grace, which in baprifmc was gi-
uen to innocency.'toftrengthen them to battaile, which in baptifmc
were new begotten to life. This Confirmation is celebrate with ari-
noiniinge, and with this forme of words,! figne thee with the fignc
of the holy croffc, and confirme thee with the chrefme of faluation,
in the name of the Father, and of the Sonnc,and of the holy Ghoft.
All this is gaiely and trimly done. But where is the word of God, that
may promifc here the prefcncc of the holy Ghoft ? They can not
bringe foorth one title. Whereby then will they certifie vs that their
chrefme is the vefTelof theholy GhoftrWefceoylejthatis.athickc
and fat liquor and nothing elfe.Lct the word(feith Auguftine)be ad-
ded to the element,3nd there fhalbc made a Sacrament. Let them (I
fay)bringe foorth this word, if they will hauc vs in the oylc to lookc
vpo any thing but the oylc. If they did acknowledge thcmfclucs mi-
nifters of the Sacramentes , as they ought , we needed to ftriuc no
longer. This is the fii ft l?.w of a minifter , that he do nothing without
commaundement. Go to,lct them bring forth any commaundement
ofthispointof miniftery,& I will not fpcake one word morc.If they "^
hauc no commaundement, they can not excufc their boldncfle full
of facrilege. After this mancr the Lordc asked the Phaiifccs, whether Mat.ii»
the Baptifmc of John were from heauen or from men : if they had 15.
anfwcred, from men, the he had made them confefTc that it was tri-
flinge and vainc : if from heauen , then were they compelled to ac-
knowledge the doftrineof lohn. Therefore leaftthevfhoulde too
muchfclaundcr lohn, they durft not confelfe thacit was from men,
If^ therefore Confirmation be from men,itis proued to be vaine and
triBinge ; if they will perfwadc vs that it is from heauen , Ictcc thcna
prouc it.
6 They do in ^ti-Ac defence themrdues with the example of the
[ Apoftles, whom they thinkc to hauc done nothingc radily. That is ^
\ Well indcedc: neither won'd we bl.nme them,ifiheyrne^"ed thcm-
fclucs followers ot the Apoftles. But what did the Apoftks ? Luke re- y^a j.
Cap.ip. Of the outwarde meanes
porteth in the Aftes , that the Aportles which were at Hierufakm^'
when they heard that Samaria had receiued the worde of God/cnc
thither Peter and lohn : they prayed for the Sam,iritans , that they
might receiue the holy Ghoft , which was^not yet come into any of
them, but they were baptifed oncly in the name of lefusiwhcn they
had praied, they laid their hands vpon them:by which laying on,ti!C
Samaritans receiued the holy Ghoft. And of this laying on ofhands
hediuerfe times maketh mention. Ihearcwhat the Apoftles did:
that is,thcy faithfully executed their miniftery. The Lord willed that
thofe Finbie and wonderful! graces of the holy Ghoft , which he rhcn
poured out vpon his people, Ihould be miniftred & diftributcd of his
Apoftles by the layingc on of handcs . But vndcr this layinge on of
handes.'I thinke there was not contained any hier myftery;but I ex-
pound it,that they adioyned fuch a cercmoniCjthat by the very out-
ward doing they might iigniHe,that they commended and as it were
ofFrcd to God him vpon whom they laid their hands. If this minifte-
ry which the Apoftles then executed , were yetftill remainjngc in
the Church, the laying on of handes alfo ought to be kept. But fincc
that fame grace hath cesiffed to be giuen, whereto feructh the laying
on of handes ?Tiuel)*the holy Ghoft is yet prefeni with the people
of God, without whom being guider & direder, the Church of God
can not ftand. For we haue the eternall promife and which ftiall cucr
- r ftand in force,by which Clitift calJcth to himfelf them that thirft,that
,- * they may drinkc huing waters. But thofe miracles of powers , & ma-
nifeft workinges. which were diftributed by the laying on of handes,
hauc ccaficdjneirher behoued it that they fhould be, but for a time.
For it behoued that the preaching of the Gofpell while it was new,
{hould he H,lorioufly fee forth & magnified, with vnhcard of and vn-
vvontcd miracles. From which when the Lord ceaffed,he did nor by-
andbyforfakc his Churchjbut taught that the royalty of h:s kingdom
& the dignity of his word was excellently enough dii'cioi'ed. In what
point thcrfore w.Il thefcftageplaiers fay that they folow y Apoftles?
They fliould haue done it with laying on of handes, that the euident
power of the holy Ghoft might byandby ftiev/e fooi th it felfe. This
they bring not to paftcrwhy therfore do they boaft chat the laying, on
of handes maketh for them, which wc read in dedc that the Apoftles
vfedjbut altogether to an other end !?
7 This hath like rcafon as' if a ma (liould teach that that breathing
Joh ao whcrwith tiicLord breathed vjion his difciplcs,isa Sacrament wher-
a». by the holy Ghoft is giuen.But wheras the Lord did this once,he did
not alfo wilUhat wc ihouldc do the fame. After the fame mancr alf®
tke
To Saliiation. Lib.4. 6"oS
the Apoftlcs laid on their handcs, during the time that it pleafcd the
Lord that the vih'ble graces of the holy Ghoft fhoulde be dfti ibutcd
at their praicrs'.nor that they which come after,(}iould onely plaicr-
like & without the thing in dede councerfait an empty & cold lignc,
as thefe apes do. But if they proue thatinlayinge on of handcs they
folow the Apoftlcs, (wherein they haue no like thmg with the Apo-
filcSjfauing I wotenot what ouerthwart wrongfuUcounterfaitinge)
yet whenfccommeth their oylc which they cai the oyle of faluation?
Who taught them to feeke faluation in oyle ? Who taught them to
giuc to it the power of itrengthening ? Did Paulejwhich draweth vs ^^^ 4.9
^rre away from the elements of this world, which condemneth no- ^*****''»
thinge more than the ftickinge to fuch pety obferuations f But this I
bodly pronounce, not of my felfc, but from the Lorde. Who fo call
oylc tne oyle offaluarion , they forl'weare the faluation which is in
Chrift,thcy deny Chrift, tliey haue no part in the kini^dom of God.
For oyle is for the belly , and the belly for oyle : the Lorde (hall dc-
ftroy both. For all chefe weake clemcntes,which decay with very vfc,
belong nothinge to the kingdom of God,which is fpirituall and (lull
neuer decay. What then?wili fome me fay:do you mcafure with the
lame meafure, the water wherewith we be baptifed, and the breadc
and wine vndcr which the Supper of the Lorde is giuen ? I anfwerc
that in Sacramentes giuen of God , twothinges are to be looked
vnto : the fubftance of the bodily thing whicjj is fette before vs, and
the forme that is by the word of God printed in it,whcrein lyeth the
whole ftrength. In refped therefore that the bread, winejand water
that arc m the Sacramentes offered to our fight, do keepe their ownc
fubftanccjthis fayinge of Paule alway hath placCjMeate for the bcl- i.Cor,€
ly,and the belly for meatcs: God {hall deftroy them both. For they » J.
pafle and vanifh away with the falhion of this worldc. But in refpedt
that they be fandifiedby the worde of God,thatthey may beSacra-
menteSjthey do not holdc vs in the fleih, but do trucly and fpiritually
teach vs.
8 But let vs yet more ncercly looke into it , howe many monftcrs
this far liquor foftcrerh and feedeth . Thefe atioynters fay , that the
holy Ghoft IS giuen in baptifme , to innocence : in Confirmation , to
cncreafe of grace, that in Baptifme, we are new begotten intolifc.in
confirmation,we arc prepared to battell. And they are fo paft fhame,
that they deny that baptifme can wcl be done without conlirmation.
O wickednelTe . Arc we not therefore in baptifine buried together
with Chrift, being made partakers of his death , that wc may be alfo
partcncrs of his rcfurredion. But this felowlhip with the death and Ro.^.4,
Cap.i5>. Of the outward meanes
life of Chrift Paulc expoundcth to be the mortifying of our fledi , &
quickcninge of our fpirittfor that our oldc man is crucihcd^that we
may walkc in ncwncffe ot life. What is to be armed to biitcfll if this
be not ? I f they comptcd it a matter of nothing , to tread vndcr fectc
thcword of God:wh)' did they not yet at Icaft rcuereiice the Church,
to whom they will m cucry point fecmc fo obcdicnt.Bu!: what can be
brought forth more ftronge ngninU their dodrine, than that decree
cSf the Milcuitane counccl?Who io fayth that baptifmc is giuen only
forforgiucnefle offinneSjand not for a help of grace to comc,cUcur-
A&.Z, fed be he . But whereas Luke , in the place which we haue ailc.iged,
*^ fayth that they were baptifcd in the name of Icfus Chrift,which iiad
not rcceiued y holy Ghoft ; he dcth not fimply deny that they v/erc
endued vvith any gift of the holy Ghoft,which beleutd in Chrift with
hart.and confclTed him with mouth:buc meaneth of tliat recciuing of
the holy Ghoft,whereby the open powers and vifiblc graces were rc-
AA.2.4 ceiued. So is itfayd that the Apoftlcs rcceiued the Spirit on the day
of Pentccoft, wiiereas it had bin long before faid vn- o them of Chrjft,
It is not you that fpeake,but the Spirite of my Father which fpcakctb
in you. BehoJdc all ye that arc of God , the malicious and poyfonous
decciie ofSachan. That thing which wastrucly giuen in baptifmcjhc
lyingely fayth to be giuen in his confirmation, chat he may by flealth
leade you vnwarc from baptifme. Who now can dout that this is the
dodrinc of Saran, whicji cuttinge awsy from baptifme the promifes
properly belonging to baptifme,doih conuey away & remoue thtm,
to an other t'nii-.gc ? It is foundc(I fay)vpon wh^t mnncr of fundaiion
Cala. u this godly anointing ftandeth.Thc word of God is,that nl they v/hich
t7 cnn. ^^^ hsptifed in Chnft, haue put on Chrift with his gifts. The word of
fedift.5 theannointersss,/ they receiucd in baptifme no promife, by which
cap.Sp. rhcy may be armed in batrails.Thatis the voice oftrueth-thcrcfcre
this mult be the voice of lyinge. Therefore I can rnore truely define
this Confirmation than they haue hitherto defined i£;namely,that ic
is anoiablefclaunderof baptifme, which darkcneth,yca aboUfhcrh
the vfc thf reof:rhat it is a falfe promife of the deuiUwhich drawcth vs
away from the tructh of God. Orjif you wil,it is ovie defiled with tiic
lying of the dcuiil, which as it were by ouerlprcadmgcof darkenefle,
^ , dvcciticth the eicsofthefimplc.
eap.i. 9 They adde furthermore, that all rhe faithfnil ought afccr hap-
de Co- ti'mcToreceiuctheholy Ghoftbylayiugc onof handcs 5 thatihey
fecr. may be founde full Chriftiansrbecaofe he fliall ncuer be a Chnftinny
'''^^' thatJS nor chrrfmrd with the b'.niopsConfirmarion.Thefe be their
leU^t ownc fjyif^gcs wordc f9rwordc. Bud had ihougiu that wharfocuer
leiuni. ihin^es
To Saluation. Lib,4. . -60^
ihingcs pertained to Chriftianity.werc all fct foorth in wrytingc and
comprehended ia Scriptures. Now, as I percciuc, the true forme of
religion is to be fought and learned from elfc where rhanoutofthc
Scnpturcs.Thcrfore the whole wifdom of God,ihe heauenly tructh,
the whole dodrine of Chrtft, doth but beginne Chriftians, and oylc
maketh them perfed.By this fentcnceare damned all the ApolHcs,
and fo many Martyrs , whomc it is raoft certctinc to houe neuer bin
chrcfmcd.'forafmuch as the oyle was not yet made.which being pou-
red vpon ihem,they might fulfil all the partes of ch; iftianty^or rather
might be made Chriftians which yet were none. BuCjchough I holdc
my pcacejthcy do largely confute themfclues. For,hpw many of the
number of their ownc people do they annoynt after bapnfmc ? why
therfore do they fuffer fuch halfe chriftians in their flocke, whofe im-
pcrfecftion might cafily be holpen? Why do they withfd carclf^ ne-
gligence fuffer the roomit that which was not lawful] to be omitted
without grcuous offenfe ? Why do thcynot more feuetelycaU vpon
the keping of a thing fo neceirary,& without whicJi faluatiO can not
be obtainedjvnlelTe peraduenturc fomc be preuentcd by death?Vc-
rily when they fo freely fuffer it to be defpifed , they fccrctly cofeffe
that it is not of fo great value as they boaft it,
10 Laft of all they determine that this holy annoynttngc is to be Cap. <Jc
had iif greater rcuetcnce thabaptifme: becaufe thisanointingis pc- his ve
culiarly miniftred by the handcs of the chicfc bi(hops , but baptifmc ^^j^^'ft*
is commonly diftributed by cuery Piieft. What may a man here fay, " ^™'
but that they arc vtterly madjwhich fo flatter their owne inuentions,
thatincomparifonof them they carelf fly defpife the holy ordinan-
ces of God ? O mouth that robbeft God, dareft thou fet a fat liquor
onely defiled with the ftmke of thine ownc breath, and enchaunted
with murmuring (bunde of wordes, agamft the Sacrament of Chrift,
and to compare it with water hallowed with the wordc of God ? But
thy wickedneflc accomptcd this but a fmal matter, vnleffc thou didft Treftlc,
alfo prcferrc it aboue the fame.Thcfc be the anfwer^,"of the holy fee, '^P^' '^
thcfe be the Oracles of the Apoftoliketrcftle. But fome of them, c- ^hc Hca
ucn in their owne opinion, be;;onnc fomwhat to cjuahfie this vnbrid- then
led madnes. It is(fay they)to be worfhipped with greater reuerence: S^"l^"
peraduenturc not for the greater vertue and profit thacrtgiueth:but ^^^ p **
becaufe it is giuen of the worthier men , and is made in the worthier phecisi
parte of the body , that is , in the forehead : or becaufe it bi ingeth a ac a
greater cncreafe of vertues , although baptifmc auaile more to for- thjec-
fiuenefTcBut irt the firft reafon do they not bewray thegafelues to be f^'^^^f
)oaauftcs, which mcafurc the force of the Sacrament by the wor- o^t/^/
HHHH iUe.
Cap.i^, Of the outward mcanes
tib.4. thineffe of the miniftcr. But I will admit , that Confirmation be caf-
Scnten. \q^ ^h^ worthier by rcafon of the worthineflc of the Bifhops han<l,
cap V ^^^ ^^ ^ "^^" ^^^^ ^^ them ^ from whenfe fo great prcrogatiue hath
bin giucn to Bilhops 5 what reafon will they bring befide their ownc
\ni\ ? The Apofties alone vfed that power, which alone diihibuted
the holy Ghof^?Are the bifhops alone Apofties ? Yea,are they Apo-
fties at all } But let vs alfo graunt them that : why do they not by the
fame argument affirme, that bilhops alone ought to louche the Sa-
crament of the blood in the Supper of the Lord : which they there-
fore deny to lay me, becaufc the Lord gaue it to the Apofties alone.^
If to the Apofties alonejwhy do they not conclude:thcreforc to the
bilhops alone?Butiny place they make the Apofties, fimple priefts:
but now the giddincs of their hed caricththean other way, fuddcnly
A(I>.5. to create the bifhops. Finally A nanias was no Apoftle,to whom yet
Dfko. ^^"^c w^* fentjthat he (hould receiue his fight,be baptifed, & be fil-
cap.Per l<id with the holy Ghoft. I will adde this alfo to the hcapc : If by the
oeojc. law of God this was the proper office of biihops, why haue they bin
fo bold to giue it away to common pricftes ? as we read in a certaine
epiftlc of Gregory.
II As for their other reafbnjhow triffing,fond,and foolifti is it,to
call their Confirmation worthier than the baptifme of God,becaufe
in it the forehead is anointed with oyle, and in baptifme the hinder
parte of the head, as though baptifme were done with the oyle and
nor with the W3ter?l cal all the godly to witncs,whether thefe lofelf
do not endeuour themfelues to this only ende, to corrupt the purc-
neftc of the Sacraments with their leuen. I haue already fpoken this
rn an other place,that in the Sacramcts,that which is of God fcarcc-
ly glimmereth through at holes, araongc the rout of the inuentions
of men. If any man did not beleuc me therein , let him nowe at Icaft
beleue his owne maifters. Loc paftinge oucr the water,and makinge
no accompt of it, they hiely eftecme the onely oyle in baptifme. Wa
therefore on the contrary fide do fay , that in baptifme the forehead
aKb is dipped in water.In coparifon of this, we eftcemc not your oyle
worth one piece of dong, whether it be in baptifme or in confirma-
tion. If any alleage that it is fold for more:by this adding of price,thc
goodnes(if any were in it) is corruptcd:fa much leflc may they c6«-
mende a moft filthy deceit by theft. In the third reafon they bewray
their own vngodlincs, while they prate that in confirmation is giuen
a greater encreafe of vertues than in baptifme. By the byinge on of
handes y Apofties diftribut ed the vifible graces of the Spirir.In what
thingc do thcfc meas fac liquor ihew it felfc fcutefuJil?Buc away with
«hcfc
To Saluation, Lib.4. 610
thcfe qualifiers , thac couer one facrilcge with many facrilcgcs. It is
like the Gordian:which ic is better to breake in fundcr,chan to labor
fo much in vndoinge it.
li But nowe when they fee thcmfelues deftitute of the wordeof
God and probable rcafonjthey prctende as they are wont,that it is a
moft auncicnt obfcruation & ttabliflied by confent of many sgcj. Al-
though that were true,yetthey winnc notJiinge thereby. A Sacra-
men: is nor fiom the carth,but from heauen:not from men, but from
God alone. They muft prouc God to be the author of their confir-
mation if they will hauc it taken for a Sacrament. But why do they
obicd antiquitie, whereas the olde wryters, when they minde to
fpeakc properly , do no where rccken moe Sacramenic.^ than two ?
If a fortrcfl'c of our faith were to be (ought from men,we hauc an in-
uincible tower, that the oldc Fathers ncuer acknowledged thofe for
Sacramcntes which thefemendo lyingely fainc to be Sacramentes.
The oldc wryters fpeaT^e of the laying on of handes:but do they call
it n Sacrament ? Auguftinc plainly affirmeth that it is no other thing Lib ?.
than praicr. Neither let them here bark« againft me with their ftink- <^e bap
king diftindions , that Auguftine meant that not of the layinge on of ^°"^' **
handcs vfcd to confirmarion,but which was vfed to healing or recon- ^.^p ^^,
ciliation. The booke remaineth & is abroade in the handcs of men.
Jt I wrcft it to any other fenfc than Auguftine himfelf wrote it,l giue
them leauc after their ordinary maner to opprelfe me not only with
failjng,but alfo with fpitting at me. For he Ipeakcth of them that re-
turned fro Schifme to the vnity of the Church. He dcnieth that they
neded to be newly baptifedrfor he faith , that the laying on of hands
fufficeth,that by the bond of peace the Lord may giuc them the holy
Ghoft. But forafmuch as it might feeme an ablurduy, that rhc laying
on of hands (liould be doneof new rather than baptifme; he iTiewcth
adifferece. Fof(raith he)what other thing is the laying of !)ands,than
praier vpon a manPAnd that this is his mraningcappc-arcih by an o-
ther place, where he faith:Handc is laid vpon hcrctikes amended,for j -^ ,
the coupling of Charity,vvhich is the grcateft gift of the holy Ghoft, cap %i
without which whatfoeucr holy things arc in man they auailc not to
faluation.
1 5 But I would to God we did kepc ftill the maner which t hauc
faid to haue bin in the olde time,before that this vntimcly dehucred
image of a Sacrament was bornetnot that it fhould be fuch a confir-
mation as they fainc,which can not once be named without iniury to
bapiifme:but a catcchifing, whereby children or they that were nerc
to the age of difcretion did declare an accompt of their faith before
HHHH ij
Cap.ip. Of the outward mcanes
the Church. But it (hould be the bcft mancr of Catechifing,ifa fomf
were written to that vfe, containing & famiharly fctting out a fumme
in n mancr o^ajl y articles of our rehgion,in which the whole church
ofthefjichfuli ought without controucrfrc to agree : thacachildc
being ten yeres oldihould offer himfelfc to the Church to declare a
conftfljDnofhis f^^ichjfhouldbe examiredof cucry article,& anfwerc
to cuery oncif he were ignorant of any thing,or did not vndcrftand
it, he might be taught.So ihould he, before the Church witneffing &
beholding it, profclfc the onlyjtrue,& pure faith, whcrwith the peo-
ple of the faitlifuU doth with one minde worfhip the one God.l f this
difcipline were at this day in force , truely the flothfulnes of fome pa-
rentes would be whsttedjwho do carclefly negled the inftsu6tion of
their children as a thing nothing belonging to thcjwhich then with-
out ope iliame they could not omitrthcre (hould be among Chriftii
people a greater c5rcnt off^ith, & not fo great ignorance & rudencs^
of many.-fome fnould not be foralhly caricd away with new & ftiagc
dodrines : fin.illy nil Ihculd hat'C as it were a certaine orderly rnihui*
^ion of chtjftian learning,
OfVenance,
14 In the next place they fet Penance , of which they cntreatc fo
confisfely & diibrdredlv , thatconfcienccs can bcarc away nofure or
foundc thinge of their dodiine. We haue already in an other place
declared at large, W[izi we had learned out of the Scriptures concer-
ning rcpcntance,.ind then what they alio teach of it. Nowe wt hauc
this onely to touchjwhat rcafon they had that railed vp the opinion,
which hath heretofore reigned in Churches and fchooles , that i^ is a
Sacrament. But fiift I will briefely fay fomewhatof the vfage of the
oide Church, the prerenfe vvherof they hauc abused to ftabhlli their
faintd inuennon. Tins order ihcy kept in publikc penancCjthat they
which had fully done the fatisfadions enioyned thcm,were rccociled
with folen-'ne laying on of handes.That was the Signe of abfolutiort,
whiuebv both the linnerhimfclfewasraifed vppe before God with
truli of pardon , and the Church was admonilhed gently to receiuc
him in?of3uour,vuiting away the remembrance of his offence. This
Ciprian cfcctimes callerhjto giue peace.That this doing might be of
greater diirnity,and haue more commendation amongc the people,it
was otdamtd that the bifhops authority {houldalway be vfed for the
meanc hcrt in. From hente came ihnt decree of the fecond counccl at
Carthage:Beitnor lawful to a prieH attheMaffepublikcly to recon-
cile a pt'tment. And an other decree of the councel at Araufium, Let
thoicwhich in time of their penace depart out of cbis life, be adnnic-
ted
ToSaluation. Lib.4. ^11
ted to the Communion without the laying on of handcs vfct] in re-
concihngc : if they recouer of their GckcntiVc let ihcm ftandc in the
degree of penitences,and when the time is fully expiicd,lt t them re-
ceiuc of the bifhop the laying on of hands vfed m reconcilmg. Again ^^P* i i
the decree of y third counccl at Carthage.Let not the prieft vvithcuc
the authority of the bifhop,reconcilc a penitent. Ail thefe tended to
this endejthat the feucrity which they v/ould haue to be v(td in that
bchalfc, Ihoulde not with too much lenity grow in decay.Thcreforc
they willed y bifhop to be judge of it , which was likely that he would
be more circumfped in the examination therof. Howbeic Ciprian in
a certaine place fheweth,thatnot only the biiliop,but alfo the whole
Clcrgie layd their handes on him. For thus he faich. At the fuli tinjc
they do penance,then they come to the Communion,& by the lay-
ing on of handes of the bilhop and the clergy, they receiue power to
partake of the Communion. Afterwardc by procelTe of time it came
1:0 this point , that befide publikc penance they vfcd this ccremonic
alfo in priuate abfolutions, Hereupon came that diftin<5iion in Gratian Decwt.
bctwenc publike & priuate reconciliation. I iudgc that fameolde v- 2<>.c]U£,
fage of which Cyprian maketh mention, to haue bii: holy & health- ^*
full for the Church,and I wouldc that it were at this day rcftored. As
for this latcr,altliough I dare not difallowe it,or at leaft fpcake more
fliarplyagainftit,yetlthinkeittobclefle neceffary . Howefoeueric
be,yet we fee that the layingc on of handes in pennnce is a ceremony
ordained of men,not of God,which is to be fet among mc.ine things
& outward exercircs:& thofe verily which are not to be dcfpifcdjbuc
which ought to be in a lower degree, than thofe that are commeded
vnto vs by the word of the Lord.
I J But the Romaniflcs and the fchoolemen , (which haue an or-
dinary cuftome to corrupt all thingcs with wrong expounding them)-
do here very carefully trauail in findinge out a Sacrrtmcnr. Neither
ought it to feemc any maruell , for they fceke a knot in a rudi?. But
where they haueitbcft, they Icaue a thingcntangeled infufpcnfe,
vncertaine,and confounded and troubled with diuerficy of opinions.
They fay therefore either that the outward penance is a Sacrament, lj^^.
and if it be fo,that it ought to be taken for a fignc of the inwarde pe- Sendf.
nance,that is.ofthc contrition ofhart, which fhalbc the thing of the »».ca»
Sacrament ; or that they both together are a Sacrament, not two Sa-
cramentcsjbut one full onc,But,that ihe outward penance is only the
Sacrament : the inward is both the thing and the Sacrament: and that
ihe forgiuenes of (innes is the thing and not the Sacrament. Let them
which keepe in remetnbraDce the definition of a Sacrament which
HHHH iij
Cap.i 9 - Of the outward mcatics
wc haue abouc fct,cxaminc thereby that which thefe men call a Sa-
<:ramenr,and they fball findc that it is not an outward ceremony or-
dained ofthe Lorde for the confirminge of our faith. If they cauil!
;h J. that my definition is not a lawe which they necde to obey : let them
u '.vet hearc Auguftin,whoni they faine that they efteme as moft holy. Vi-
Liiaai. (^ble Sacramcntcs (f-aych he) were ordained for carnall mens fakes,
that by degrees of Sacramentes they may bcconucied fromthofc
things that arc fcenc with eies to thofc things that arc vndcrftanded.
What hkerhingcdo cicherthcy themfducsfce, or canthcy fhewto
other in that which they call the Sacrament of Penance ? The fame
prrno Auguftine faith in an orhcrplace:It is therfore called a'Sacramet,be-
I de caufe in k one thing is fcenc^fic an other other rhmg is vnderftanded.
•>> in . That which is fecnejbath a bodily forme:that which is v-nderHanded,
'•'^' hath a fpirituall frutc.Neither do thefe things in any wife ngrec with
the Sacrament of penance , fuch as they fainc it , v/hcre there is no
bodily forme that may reprefenta fpirituai frute.
16 And,to kil rhcfe bcnfts vpon their ownc fighting p!ace,if there
be any Sacrament here to be fought, may it not be much more colc-
rably laid that the abfolutio ofthe pricll is a SacrameCjthan penance
cither inward or outward ? For it might readily be fayd, that it is a ce-
remony to afTurc cur faith ofthe forguicncs of Cnnes , 6c hath a pro-^
mife of the keicsas they call it , Whatfocucr ye flia'l binde or loof'c
vpon earthjtlulbc boundc or loofed in heauen. But fome man would
haue obiedcd , that the moft parte of them that are abfolucd of the
pricflesjobtaineno fuch thing by fuchabfolutiotwhercas by their do-
^rine the Sacr»mentes ofthe new law ought to woike in decde that
which they figure. This were but to be laughed at.For.as in the Sup -
per,they make a double eating, a Sacramc ntall catint^ which is egaU
ly common to good & to cuill,& a fpintual eating which is only pro--
per to the good : why might they not alfo faine thnt abfclution is 1 e-
ceiuedtwo wayes ? Yetcoulde Inot hitherto vnderlhnde vv-hnt they
meant with this their dodrinc , which wc haue already taught howc
far it difagrecth from the tructh of God,v/he v/c purpofely entreated
of that argumec.Here my minde is only to fiiew^that this dout with-
'• ftandcth not,but that they may call the abr^lution ofthe pricfl a Sa-
ftiim cramcnt. For they might aunfwcre by the mouth of Auguftine , that
e bap. fandification is without the vifiblc Sacramenr,& the vifible Sacramcc
iruul. without inward faneT:ification. Aeainc.that the Sacraments do worke
;^* in the only elc<Sthat which they figure. Againe>ihat fome do put on
intra,* Chrift fo far as to the partaking ofthe Sacramef, other fome to fan^
onac. dification:the one, the good and euill cgally douhis othcr,the good
only.
ToSaluation. Lib.4. 6iz
onely.Trucly they hauc more than childifhly erred & be blinded in
die clearc fanneiwhich trauailing with great hardnes^yet cipicd noc
a thing fo plaine and open to eucry man.
17 Yet Icaft they (houlde waxc too proudc , in what parte focuer
they fct the Sacrament,! deny that it ought rightfully to be taken for
a Sacrament. Firfljbecaufe there is no fpeciall promifc to it, which is
the only fubdancc of a Sacrament. Againe, becaufc whatfocucr ce-
remony is here (hewed foorth , it is the mere inucntion of menne:
wheras we haue already proued that the ceremonies of Sacraments
can not be ordained but of God. Therefore it was a lye and a dcceite Lib 4.
which they haue inucnted of the Sacrament of penance. This fai- Sen.
xicd Sacrament they hauc garnifhcd with a mcete commendation, '^^^ *+•
calling it a feconde boord after fhipwrecke.'becaufe if a man hauc by "P '*
finninge marred the garment of innocence which he receiued in ni.dift.i
baptifme he may by pcnacctepaire ic.Butitis the faying ofHierom. cap. a.
Whofe focuer it be , it can not be excufed but y it is vctcrly wicked,
if it be cxpoudcd after their meaning. As thogh baptifme be blotted
ouc by finnc, & is not rather to be called to remembrance of euery
finner)fo oft as he thinketh of the forgiuencfle of finne,that he may
thereby gather vp himfclfe, and recouer courage, and ftrenghthen
his Faithjthat he fhall obtaine the forgiuenes of (innts which is pro-
xnifed him in baptifme. But that which Hierome hath fpokcn hard-
ly and vnproperly,thatby penance baptifme isrepaircd(from which
they fall away that deferuc to be excommunicate from the Church)
thefe good expofitours drawc to their wickednefTc. Therefore you
fhall moft fitly fpeake,if you cal baptifme the Sacrament of penance,
fith it is giucn for a confirmation of grace , and feale of confidence,
to them that purpofe repentance. And leaft you fiioulde thinke this ^
to be our dcuifc , befide this that it agreeth with the wordes of the , j, qu^,'
Scripture,it appcareih that it was in the old Church commonly fpo- i.cap.
Jcen like a moft certaine principle. For in the bookc of Faith to Pc- firmifll-
ter, which is faid to be Auguftines,it is called the Sacrament of Faith J"**
& of penance. And why flee we to vncertainefayings?As though wc luJJ'I] t
could require any thing more plaine,than that which the Euangclift
recitcth:that lohn preached y baptifme of repentance vnto forgiuc-
nesoffinnes?
Ofixtrcme -vncfion ax they ccdliu
18 The third faincd Sacrament is extreme vnftion, which is not
dione but of the Prieft, & that in extremes, (fo they termc it) & with
oyle confccratc of the bi(hop,& with this formeiBy this holy anoin-
ang,& by his moft kind mercy,God pardo thee whatfoeuer thou haft
HHHH iiij
Cap.19. Of the outward mcancs
offended by (cing.by hcaring,by lmelling,feling,tafting.Thcy faine
that there be two vertues of it ,y forgiuencs of finncs, & eafe of bo*'
dily fickcnefle if it be fo expcdient:if nor , the faluation of the foule,
[am. 5. T^hey fay that the infticution of it is fct of lames , whole wordes arc
;4> thcfe. Is any licke amongc you ? Let him bringe in the Elders of the
Church,& Jet them pray oucr him, anointinge him with oyle in the
name of the Lord:& the praier of Faith (hall faue the fickc man, and
the Lord (hall raife him vp : & if he be in finnes,they (halbe forgiuen
him.Of rhe fame fort is this anointing,of which we haue aboue (he-
wed that y other laying on of hands is,namcly a playcrlikc hipocri(Tc,
whereby Without reafon and without frote they would refemble the
Apoftlcs. Marc rchearfcth that the Apofllcs at their firft fending, ac-i
^^•^* cordihgc to the commaundement which they haue receiued of the
'^* Lorde,raifed Vp dead mcn,cattouc deuils,clcanfcd leprous menjhea-
led the ficke,& that in healing of y ficke they vfed oyle. They anoin-
ted(faith in)many ficke men with oyle,& they were healed. Hereun-
to lames had rcfped, when he commaundcd the Elders to be called
together ro anoint the ficke man . That vnder fuch Ceremonies is
contained no hicr myftery,thcy fhall cafily iudgc which marke howc
great liberty the Lord & his Apoftlcs vfed in thefe outward thingcs,
^o n 5 Xhe Lord gomge about to reftorc fight to the blinde man,niade cley
Matcp. ofduft & fpiitlcjibmc he healed with touchinge,other fomc with his
59 • word. After the fame maneryApoftles he -rlcdfomedifeafes with the
Lac. 18. word only,fome with touchinge,other fome with anointing.But it is
Ad 6 '''^^'y ^'^'** ^^^'5 anointing was not (as all other thingesalfo were not)
& 5.,^. caufelefly put in vre. Igraunt :yctnc/tthatit{hourde be amcane of
& 1 9. 1 a healing,but only a figne,that the dulnes of the vnskilfuU might be put
^f^'-4)' in mmde from whenfe fo great power proceeded , to this cndc that
they (hould not giue the praifc therof to the ApoiHes. And,that the
holy Ghoft & his giftes are figmfied by oyle it is a common & vfuall
thing.Buc that fanjegraceof healings is vanifhedaway,likeas alfo the
othep mir3cies,which the Lord willed to be fliewcd for a time,wher-
by he might make the new preaching of the Gofpel maruelous for c-
uer.Theifore though we graontneuerfcxmuchjihat anointing was a
Sacrament bf ihofe powers which were then miniftred by the hands
of the Aportkijit r.ownothingepertainethto vs to whom the mini ■•
ftration of fuch pow^rrsis not committed.
[ohn< 9. '9 '^"^ ^y w.h^t greater reafon do they make a Sacrament of this
7. anoinfirigjrha of all other figncs that are rchearfed to vs in the Scrip-
Aftao, ture? Why do they not appoint fomc Siloah to fwim in J whcreinto
''^* at certainc ordinary fecourfes of iimcs ficke menne may plunge
therofelues
To Saluation. Lib.4. 61^
themfclucs ? That ( fay they ) (hould be done in vaine. Trucly no
more in vaine than anointing.Why do they not lie along vpon dead
mcnjbecaufc Paul railed vp a dead childc with lying vpon him?Why
is not cley made of fpittle and duft,a Sacrament ? But the other were
but lingular examples : but this isgeuen of lamesforacommaun-
dement. Verily lames fpake for the fame timc,when the Church yet
ftill enioyed (uch blefling of God, They affirme in dede that there is
yet ftill the fame force in their anointing : but we finde if otherwifc
by experience. Let no man nowe marucll howc they haue with fuch
boldneffe mocked foules,vvhich they knowe to be fenfleire & bhndc
when they are fpoiled of the word of God , that is, of their life and
lightrfith they are nothing aftiamed to go about to mockc the liuing
and feling CenCes of y body.Therfore they make themfclucs worthy
to be fcorned,while they boft that they are eoducd with the grace of
healings. The Lorde verily is prefcnt with his in all ages, and fo ofc
as neede is he helpeth their fickneffes no lelTe than in oldc time : but
he doth not fo vtter thofc manifeft powers, nor diltributcth miracles
by the handesof the Apoftlcs ; becaulc this gift both was but for a
lime,3nd alio is partly fallen away by the vnthankfulaefle of men.
20 Therefore as not without caufc the Apoftles haue by the
figne of oile openly teihfied,that the grace of healings committed to
ihcm was not.their own power, but the power of the holy Ghoft:fo
on the other fide they arc wrongdoers to the Holy Ghoft, which
make a (linking oilc and of no force, to be his powcr.This is altoge-
ther like as if one would fay that all oile is the power of the Holy Matt.*.
Ghoft.becaufc it is called by that name in Scripturerthat euery douc « <?.
is y holy Ghoft, becaufe he appered in that forme.But thefe things, Iohn,i,
let them lokc to. So much as for this prcfent is enough for vs, we do ^**
moft certainly perceiue that their annointing is no Sacramec:which
is neither a Ccrcmonie oi deined of God,nor hacli any pron}]re. Fee
when we require thefe two things in a Sacrament , that it be a cere-
monicordeinedof God,and thatithaueapromifc ofGod:wedo
thcrcwithall require that the fame Ccremomc be geuento vs , and
that the piomife belong vnto vs. For no man doth affirme that Cir-
cumcilion is nowe a Sacrament of the Chriftian Church, although it
both was an ordinance of God , and had a promife knitt vnto it ; be-
caufe it was neither commaunded to vs , nor the promife which was
adioine J to it was giuen to vs v/ith the fame codinon. That the pro-
mife wich tliey proudely boft of in their annointingc , is not geuen
to vs, wc haue cuidently flicwed , and they themfelucs declare by ex-
pei;ience.Thc Ccrcmonie ought ro( to haue bene vfedibut of them
i-.ap.ip. Ut the outwardc mcancs
that were endued with the grace ofhcalingSjnotofthcfe butchers
chat can more fkiU of flaying and murtheringthan of healing.
X I Howbcit although they obceine this, that that which lames
commaundcth concerning annointing.agrccth with this age(which
they arc moft farre from) yet euen fo they fhall not haue much prc-
iiailed in prouing of their vndtion wherewith they hauchetherto
annpinted vs. lames willeththat all Hckemenbeannointed: thefe
men infcd with their fat liquor, not (ickc men,but corpfes half dcad^
when the life lieth already laboring at the toppe of their lippes,or (as
they themfehies termc it) in extremes. If they haue in their Sacra-
ment a prcfent medicine , whereby they may either eale the (harpc-
nefTcof direares,or at the leaft may bring fomc comfort to the foulc,
they are to cruel that do neuer heale in time. lames willcth that the
ficke man be annointedof the Elders of the Church: thefe men
allowe no annointer but the pety facrificing Pricft. Whereas they
cxpounde in lames presbyteros the Elders to be Priefts, and fondly
fay that the plurall number is there fet for comlineHe fake:that is but
thfltngras though the Churches at that time abounded with fwarmes
of facrificing Priefts, that they might go in a long pompous (hewc to
Carrie a pageantc of holy oile. When lames fimply biddeth that (ickc
men be annf>inted,I vnderftande by it none other annointing but of
common oile : and none other is found in Markes rehearfall. Thefe
men vouchcfauc to haue none other oile,but that which is hallowed
of the Bifliopjthat is to fay, warmed with much breathing on it, en-
chaunted with much mumbling,and with the knee bowed nine times
faluted in this mancr:tbrife Haile holy oile: thrift Haile holy chrefme:
thrife Haile holy balme. Out of whom haue they fucked fuch coniu-
rationsHamcs faith : that when the (ickc man is annointed with oile,
and prayer hath bene pronounced oucr him, if he be in finnes they
ihalbe forgcuen him : namely , that the giltincfle being taken away,
they may obteine releafe of the peine : not meaning that (innes arc
put away with fat liquor,but that the prayers of the faithfull whereby
the afB'ded brother is commended to God.fhall not be raine.Thcfe
me do wickedly ly,that by their holy,that is to fay, abhominablc an-
nointingjlinnes are forgcucn.Lo howe gaily they fhall preuaile,whcn
they haue bene at large fufFrcd to abufe the teftimonie of lames at
their pleafure. And leaft we (hould ncedc to trauailc long in profe
hereof, their ownc chronicles do difchargc vs of this hardnes. For
ihey report that Pope Innoccntius,which in Auguftines time gouer-
nedthc Church of Rome,ordcincd that not oncly Priefts, hut
alfo all Chriftiaos {hould vfc oile to annoint far tl^cir owne neceillti?
and
To Saliiation. Lib.4. ^14
tnd others. Author hereof is Sigcbertin his Croniclcs.
0^ Ecclcfiafiicall Orders.
21 The fourth place in their regifterhath the Sacrament of
Order : but the fame {o fruicfulljthat it bredeth out of it id^e. feuen
htlc Sncramcnts.But this is very worthy to be laughed at,that wheras
they aflrlrmc that there be feuen Sacraments, when they go about to
rehearlc them they reclren vp thirtcne. Neither can they allege for
lliemfelucs , that they are but one Sacrament, bccaufc they tende all
to one Priefihode,and arc as it were certaine degrees vnto tt. For (ith
it is euident that in cuery one of them are feueral Ceremonies, and
they themfelues fay that there be diaerfe graces:no ma can dout but
that they ought co be called feuen Sacraments , if then- opinions be
rcceiued. And why ftriue we about it as though it were a thing dout-
full J forafmuch as rhey themfelues do plainly and feuerally declare
fcuen ? But firft we will brefcly knitt vp by the way , howe many and
howc vnGiuorie abfurdities they thrufl in vnto vs, wlic they go about
to commendc to vs their Orders in ftecde of Sacraments : and then
we wilfe whether the Ceremony which Churches vfe in ordering of
miniflerSjOUght to be called a Sacramental all.They mafce therefore Libr. 4.
feuen ecdcfiafticall Orders or degrees , which they garnilh wich the Lenten.
name of a Sacrament. Thofe be , dorekcpers, Reders , Exorciftes, '^ ^^
Acoluthc$orfollowers,Subdcacons,Deacons,Prie(ls. And vii they ' ^'
Cay that they be,for the feuenfolde grace of the Holy ghoft, where-
with ihey ought to be endued that are promoted vnto them. But it is
encreafcd and nwrc largely heaped to them in their promotion.
Nowc the number it felfe is hallowed with a wrongfull expounding
of Scripturei when they thinke that they haue red in Efai vii vcrtues Efa- 1«.
of the Holy ghoft whereas both in deede Efay there rehearfeth but l" ^
fix, and alfo the prophet mcnt not to comprehende them all in that ,q'
place : for he is els where as well called the Spirit of hfe,of fandifi- Rom. t.
cation , of adoption of the childicn , as he is in that place called the 4 c^- <>•
Spiritof wifdoTjc, of vnderftadingjof counfcll,offtrcngth)Ofknow- *^-
lcdgc,& of the fearc of the Lorde.Howbcit fome futtcler men make • j' ^^^^
not feuen orders , but nine , after the likcnefle ( as they fay ) of the opinio
Church triumphing. But among them alfo there is ftriferbccaufe ofHwe
fome would haiic thcfliauing of thetrlergic tobe the firftorderof^j"* *'■»
all,and Biflioprike the laft : other fome excluding ihauing altogether, yy^ji^ij
recken Archcbifhoprike amonj^ihe orders. Ifidorc othcrwifediui- of Pa*
deth them ? For he rnakcth Pfalniiftes and Reders to be diuerfe : he ri<c.
appointcth the Pfalmiftcs for fonges , and the Reders to the reding l^- «•
of the Scripfures,\vherewith the people may be inftrudcd. And this ^"^ ^'•'
Cap.rp. Ot the outwarde meancs
Dift j». diftindion is kept by the canons. In (o greac diuerfity what will they
* dift. jjgy^ y^ ^Q followe or ftce ? Shall we fay that there be feuen orders?
ilet, & ^° teacheth the mafter of the rchole:buc the moft illuminate dodors
ca. Of ^o otherv^ife determine. Againcthey alio difagrcc among them-
tiarius. fclues. Morcouer the moft facred canons call vs an other way. Thuj
forfoth do men agree , when they difputc of godJy matters without
the word of God.
Iohn.2. *^ But this excedcth all folly, that in cucry one of thefc they
, J * * make Chrift fcllowe with them. Firft (fay they) he executed the of^
ficc of dorekf per,when he did with a whip made of cordes, driue the
IoH.ro. biers and fellers out of the temple. He fignificth himfelfc to be i
7- dorckepcr,when he fayeth, I am the dore.He toke vp6 him the office
^" • '♦' of Readcr,when he red Efay m the Sinagoge.He did the office of an
Mar.i^. E*orciO:,wben touching the tongand earesof the defFe and dummc
53. man , he rcilorcd to him his hearing. Hetcftified himfelfe to bean
loh.8. Acolurh or follower in thefewordes, He that followeth me.walkcth
' ', not in darkcnefle.He executed the office of Subdeacon , when being
^ * girded with a linen cloth he walhed the difciples feete. He did bearc
l.Ut.i6 the perfon of a Deacon , when he diftributed his body and blood in
a<>. the Suppcr.He fulfilled the office of Prieft,when he offred himfelfe
*^«« »7 vpon the crofle a facrifice to his Father. Thefc things can not fo be
tphc.?. ^^^^^ without laughing, that I maruel that they were writtc without
,. laughing, if yet they were men that wrote them. But moft notable is
their futteltie wherewith they play the Philofophers about the name
of Acoluth , calling him a Ceroferar, a taper bearer with a word (as
I thinke) of Ibrcerie , trucly fuch a one as was neuer heard of in all
natios and languages, whereas Acoluthos in Grcke (imply (igniHeth
a follower. Howbeit if I fhould earneftly tarry in confuting thefc
men,I fhould my fclfc alfo worthily be laughed at,they arc fo trifling
and very mockeries.
Z4 But that they may not be able yet flill with falfe colors to de*
ceiue euen very hlly womc, their vanitie is by the way to be vtiercd.
They create v/ith great pompe and folemnitie their Reders , Pfal-
miftes,Dorkcpers, Acoluthes,to execute ihofe offices,whcrunto they
appoint very children , or thofe whome they call lay men. For who
for the moft part lighteth the candels,v.'hopoureth wine and water
into the cruet , but a childe or fome bafe fellowe of the hitie , that
rnaketh his gainc thereof? Do not the fame men fmg , Do they not
fhuttand open the Church dorcs? For who euer fawc in their tem-
ples an Acoluth , or a Dorekcpcr executing his office? But rather he
that whe he was a boy did the office of an Acoluth^when he is ones
adiimtcd
To Saluation. Lib4. ^15
admitted into the order of AcoluthcSjCcfTeth to be that which he
beomnech to be called, that they may fecmc to will ofpurpofcto
caft of the office when they take vpon them the title. Beholde why
ihey hauc needc to be confecrate by Sacraments , and to recciuc the
Holy ghoft , namely , that they may do nothing. If they allege for
cxercifc, that this is the frowardneire of times, chat chcy foiTake and
ncgled their minifteries: let chem thcrcwithallconfefrc th?.t there
is at this day in the Church no vfe nor frutc of their holy Orders*
which they marueloufly aduance,3nd that their whole Church is full
of curferbccaufe it luftleth tapers & cruets to be handled of children
and prophane men , which none are worthy to touch but they that
are confecrate Acoluches : and becaufc it committcth the'ibnges to
children, which ought not to bcheardbut of a hallowed mouth. As
for their Exorciftes , to what endc do they confecrate them ? I hefc Aft. i>
that the lewes had their Exorciftes : but I fe that they were fo called i j.
of the exorcifmes or coniur^tions which they vfed. Of thefe coun-
terfait exorciftes who cuer heard it fpokcn , that they fhewcd any
example of their profeifion?lt is faineid that they haue power gcuen
them to lay their handes vpon mad men, them that are to becatc-
chifed, and men poflefled with deuils:but they cannot perfwadc
the dcuils that they haue fuch powerjbecaufe the dtuiU do not only
rot yeldc to their commaundements, but alio vfe commaiindrngau-
thoritie ouer them.For a man can fcarcely finde euery tech of them,
that is not led with an cuill Spirit-Therefore whatfoeuer things they
babble concerning their pety Orders, are patched together of folirfi
and vnfauory hes. Of the olde Acoluthes,andDorekepers, and
Reders , we haue fpoken in an other place , when we declared the
order of the Church. Our purpofe here is onely to fight againft that
newe founde inucntion of the feutnfold Sacrament in eccleliaiticall
Orders. Of which there is no where any thing red, but among thefc
foolifli prateis the Sorboniftes and Canoniftes.
1 5 Nowe let vs cofider of the ceremonies which they vfe about
it.Firft whomfoeuer they rcceiue into their order of foldiarSjthcy do
with one comon figne entre them into Clcrgic.For they lliaue thera Caplu
in the crownc,that the crownc may betoken kingly dignitie, becaufe ^^ipU
Clerkes ought to be kinges,that they may rule thcmfclues and other. » 2q««-
For Peter fpeaketh thus of them, Ye area chofcn kindc , a kingly ,'^j^
priefthode, a holy nation, a people of purchacc. But it was facrilegc i*^, '
to r^ke to thcmfclues alone that which is geue to the whole Church,
and proudely to glory of the title which they had taken from the
faithfull. Peter fpeaketh to the whole Churchi.thcfe fciiowcs wrcft it
V
Cap. 19. Of the out warde meanes
tibr.4. CO a tew fhauen men ; as though it were raidio them oloriCjbcy®
gn: en. j^^jy . ^5 though rhcy alone were purchaccd by the blood of Chnft:
XA. tap, ^' though :hey alone were by Chnft inade a kingdome & priellhode
Duo to God. Tbenthcy afligne alio other rcafons: the top of their hed
font, is made bare, that tl>cir minde may be declared to be free vnto the
Lord,whicb with open face may behoide the glory or God.Or that
thcymay be taoghr chat thcfaultes of their mouth and their eyes
muft be cut of. Or the Ihauing of their bed is the putnng away of
tcmporall things, and the hcary compafle about the crowne are the
remnantcs of goodes that arc retcincd for their fuftcnance. All in
figncs ; becaufe forfoth the veile of the tcplc is not yet cut in fonder.
Therefore bcing^pcrfuadcdtkit they haue gaily difchargcd their
dutieSjbecaufe they banc figured fuch things by iheir crowncjof the
very things in deedc ihey pcrformc nothing at all Howe long will
libr, 4. ihey roocke v$ with fuch falfe colors and deceites ? The clergic by
^^^^"' Oiearingof a fcwc heares do fignifie that they haue caft away the a-
S4.ca.i. boundancc of temporal! goods,that they behoide the glory of Godj
chat tbey haue morcificd the luft of the earcs and tyns : but there is
no kmdc of men more rauening ^ more fenflelly dull . more luftfull?
Why do they not rather trucly pcrforme hoUnefie, than with falfe
and jieng figncs counterf^t a fbewe of it?
i& Morcouer when they fay that the crowii' of she Ckrgie hath
the bcoinnmg and rcalbn from the Nazarites : what other thing do
they alkgCjthan that their miftericsarc Iprongoutof thelewifh
CeremonieSyOr rather that they are mere lewKhnelFe ? But whereas
>ft< 1 8. ^'^^y ^'^'■fher fay^that Prilcilb, Acila,and Paul hirafelfe,taking a vowc
I a, vpon them did ibearc their hedcSjthat they might be purified '. they
bewray their grofle ignorance.For it is no where red of Prifcilla : and
of Acila alfo it is doutfuU : for that fame {hearing may as well be rc-
ftn ed to Paule as to Acila. But , that we may not leaiie to them that
which they require, that they haue an example of Paele i the fimpler
». Cor. muft nocc,thac Paul did neuer ftiearc his head for any fand^ification,
^.io. t>ut onciy to ferue the weakeneflc of his brethren. I am wont to call
fuch vowes the vowes of charitie not of godlinelfe : that is to fjy,not
taken in hande for any fcriiicc of God, but to bearc with the rude-
ncirc of the weakc : as he himfclfe faith,that he was made a lewc to
the TcweSj&G.Thereforc he did this,and the fame but ones.and for a
{hone time , that he might for a time faftiion himfelfe to the lewes.
Thefe men,when they will without any vfe couterfait the purifyings
Kumb. ^^^^^^ NazariteSjWhac do they els but raifc vp an other lewiftmelTe,
4.1$. ' when they wrongfully couctto foUowe the olde Icwiftincffe ? With
the
To Saluation. Lib.4. 616
the fame rcligioufneflc was th.it dccretall Hpiftlc made , which , ac- Cs.pr^
cording to the Apoftlc , forbiddcth clcrkcs that they ihould not fuf- '»'^c-
fcr their hcarc to growc^but (here it rounH c hke a boowlc. As though ^^^
the Apoftlc, when he tcacheth what is comly for all men, were care- jj. *
full for the rovinde flicaringc of the Clergie. Hereby Jet the rcdcrs i.Cor,
confider,ofwhac force and worthincflc arcthorc other miseries "•4-
that followe.into which there is fuch an entnc.
27 Whcnfe the (hearing of Clcrkcs toke beginning > appeareth
fofficicntly cucn by Auguftinc alone.Whcreas at that time none fuf* Awgnft.
frcd their hcare to grow, but nice men, & fuch as coucted a fmothe- ^^ "P«-
neflc & trimnefle not mete enough for men:it fccmed to be a point "°^*^'
of no good cxamplcjif that were permitted to the clergic.Thcrcforc item ia
Clerkcs were comaundcd cither to Qicare their head or co (hauc it, Rctrac.
that they fhould not bcare any (hewc of womanlike trimming. But
this was fo common,that ccrtaine monkcs,that they might the more
fetout their owne holinelTe with notable & feuerall attire from other
men,did let their hcarc growc long. But afterward when the falhion
turned to wearing of hearc,and certain nations were added toChri-
ftiandome which alway vfed to wcare long hcarc, as Frauncc, Gcr-
many,& £ngland:ic is likely that clerkes did cucry where (hcare cheic
hcdes,lca(t they (hould feemetocouetthcgaineflTeofhcare. At the
laft in a corrupter age, when aU oldc ordinances where cither peruer-
led or gone out of kindc into fupcrftitiojbccaufc they fa we no caulc
in the (hearing of the dergic ( for they had rcicincd nothing but a
foli(he countcrfating) they fled to a millcrie, which nowe they fupcr-
ftitioufly thruftin vnto vsfor the approuing of their Sacrament.The Libr.4,
dorekcpcrs at their confccration rccciuc the kcyes of the Church, 5c»«eij,
whereby they may vnderlhnd that the keping of it is committed to * *J*
them.Thc reders rcceiuc the holy Bible. The exorciftes rccciuc the
formes of cxorcifracs,which they fhoulde v(e ouer mad & them that
arc to be catechifcd.The Acoluthcs rcceiue the tapers and cruct.Lo
ihcfc arc the ccremonics,whcrein (if God will) there is fo much fc-
crct power,that they may be not only (ignes and tokens,but alfo cau-
fes of inui(iblc grace. For this they require by their dcHnition,whea
they will hauc them taken among the Sacramcts.But to make an ends
in fcwe wordcs,! fay it is an abfurditie that in their fcholcs and canos
they make thefc leffcr orders Sacrametsrwhcrcas cuen by their owne
confeflfion that tcache this , they were vnknowen to the primiiiue
Church,and dcuifed many yeares after. For Sacramcts,(ith they con-
tcinethe promifc of God, can not be ordeined of Angels, nor of
tnen,but of God alonc,whoesofHce alone it is co geuc promifc*
Cap, I p . Of the outward meanes
28 There remaine three orders , which they call the greater*
O f the which,Subdeaconric (as they call it) was rcmoucd into that
number, iins that the route of the fmaller ones bcganne to growc.
But becaufe they feemc to hauc a tcftimonie for ihefe out of the
word of God, they do peculiarly for honors fake, call them holy or-»
ders. But nowe it is to be Icne , howc crokedly they abufe the ordi-
nances of God to their pretence. Wc will begin st the order of
Priefthode or the facrificers office. For by thefe two names they
iignifie one thing, and fo they call them to whom they fay that it per-
teineth to offer vpon the altar the facrificc of the body and blood
of Chrilt, top I onounce prayers, and to bleflc thcgiftes of God.
Therefore at their confccration theyreceiue the patinc with the
ho(fes,for tokens of powergeucnto them , to offer acceptable facri-
fices to God. And their handcs arc annointed : by which figne they
are taught, that they haue power geuen them to confecrate. But of
the Ceremonies we (hall fpcake hercaficr.Of the thing it ftlfe I fay:
it (o hath no title of the word of God which they pretende , that
they could not more wickedly corrupt the order fct by God. Firft
verily this ought to ftande for a thing confeffed (which we haue af-
firmed in entreating of the Popifhe mafle) that they are all wrong
doers to Chrift , which call themfelucs facrificing pricfls ,to offer a
facrificeof appcafement. He was appointed and confecrate of the
Father a priefl with an othe,according to the order of Melchifedcch,
Pfii 110 without any ende, without any fucccfTor. He ones oflxed a facrificc
J: , of cternall fatisfadoric cleanfing, and reconciliation : and nowe alfo
6mW, Ix^Jng cntred into the Sanduarie of heauen , he malceth interccffioa
3. for vs. In him we are all facrificing priefts, but to praifes and geuings
of thankcs, finally to offer vs and ours to God. It was his fingular of-
fice aloncjwich his offring to appcafe God,and to purge finncs. When
thefe men take that vpon them , what rcmaincth but that their facri^
ficing Pricflhode is vngodly and full of facrilege ? Truely they are to
wicked,when they dare garniHi it with the name of a Sacrament. As
touching the true office of Priefthode , which is commended to vs
by the mouth of Chrift, I willingly accompt it in that degree. For
therein is a ccrcmonie , firft taken out of the Scriptures , then fuch a
Y' one as Paule teftiHeth not to be vaine nor fuperfiuous^bot a faithfull
4^114. ' Si'j;ne of fpirituall grace. But whereas I haue not fet it for a thirde in
the number of Sacraments, I did it becaufe it is not ordinaric and
common among all the faithfull , but a fpeciall rite for one certainc
office. But lull this honor is "euen to the Chriftian mmifterie, there
is no caule therefore why the Popiih facrificers fhouUl be proudc.
For
To Saluation. Lib4. ^17
ForCIiriQcommaiindcddiftributcrsof hisGofpcll and miftcrics to Mjt.iS
be o: dcincd , not lacrificers to be confecratcd. He gatie them com- l^'
n5aandcrncnrtopvcachc the GofpcUandto fcedethcflockcjnotto , , '
offer lacriftccs. He promifcd the the grace of the holy Ghoft,not to loh.21 .
mAc ranstVtitoriepurgmgoFfinncs, bui rightly to execute and to »5«
roaintcinc the noucrncmcnt of the Church.
29 i he ceremonies agree very well with the thing it fclfc. Our
Lotde when he feni forth the Apoftlis to prtochc the Gofpell,did I«*'-*<^»
blowe vppon thcm.By which Signe he reprefcntcd the power of the
holy Gholl which he gaue vnto the. This blowing thefe good men
haue recemed , ajid as though they did put forth the holy Ghoft out
at their throte, they whifperoucr their filly priefts that they make,
Kccciue the holy Ghoft. So Icaue they noihmg which they do not
OiUTthwarily countcrfait : I will not fay like players (which vfe their
gcfturings neither without arte nor without fignificati6)but like apes,
which countcrfait cucry thing wantonly and without any choifc.VVc
tccpe (ivW they) the example of the Lordc. But the Lorde did many
thiiijJS which he willed not to be examples to vs. The Lordc fai'd to ^oh »o
the difciplcs, Rcceiue y holy Ghoft.He faid alfo ro Lazarus* Lazarus **•
come fordi. He faid to the man lickc of the palfey , Rife and walkc ^ ' " '
Why do nor they fay the fame to all dead men & ficke of the palfty? Matt. 9.
He (hewed a profeof his diuinc power, when in blowing vpon the 5.
Aportlcs he filled them with the grace of the holy Ghoft.lf they go Iob,s.8
about to do the fame thmgjthey cnuioufly countcrfait God,and do
in a maner chalenge him to ftriuc with thcm:but they are farre from
the tftt d} & do nothing with this foolifli gcfluring but mock Chrift.
Vciily they be fo fliamclcfi'e , that they dare affirme that they gcuc
the holy GhodBut howc true that iSjCxpericcc teacheth, which cricch
our that fo many as be confccrated pricfts are of horfcs made afTcs,
of foclcs made madmen. Neither yet do I Hriue with them for that:
cnely I condcmnc the ceremonic it fclfc , which ought not to hauc
btncdrawcn to be an cxamplc,forafmuchas it was vfed of Chrift
for a fingular figne of one miracle : fo farre is it of, that the cxcufc
of following his example ought to defend them.
50 But of whom rcceiued they the annointing ? They aunrwere , ..
that they recciued it of the fonncs of Aaron,from whom their order scnteo!
al'.'o toke beginnmg.Therforc they had rather alway to defend them Diftin.
felucs with wrongfull cxamples,than to cofeflTe that themfelucshauc »4«5a *
deuifcd that which they vfc without caiifc. But m the meanc time ^ *°
they confider not,that while they profeflc themfelucs the fuccefibrs d,ft. »,,
of chc Tonnes of Aaron^ they arc wrongdoers to the priefthodc of c4P.i«
iia
Cap. I p . Ot trie outvvarde mcanes
Chnft , which alone was fhadowcd and figured by all the olde facri-
ficing pricfthodes.In him therefore they were ail conteined and ful-
filled, in him they ceaflred,as we hauc fomtimcs already rcpctcd,and
tlic Epiftle to the Hebrues without heipe of any glofes teftificth.But
if they be fo much dclitcdwiththe ceremonies of Mofes, why do
they not haftily take oxen,c3lues,and labcs to make facrifices ? They
haue in deede a good part of the olde tabernacle and of the whole
Icwidi maner of worfbipping : but yet this wantcth in their religioot
that they do not facrifice calues and oxen. Who can not fee,that this
obferuatio of annointing is much more hurtfull than Circumc!fion>
specially when there is adioined fuperftition and Pharifaicall opinion
of the worthinefTe of the worke ? For the lewes did fee in Circum-
cifion , iruft of righteoufnefle : thefe men do fet in annoincing , fpt-
rituall graces.Therfore while they couet to be counterfaiters of the
Leuites , they arc made Apoftataes from Chrift , and do put them-
felues from the office of Paftors.
3 1 This is(if God wil) the holy oile chat printeth the marke that
can not be raced out. As though oile could not be wiped away with
dufl and fait,or if it (hcke fafter,with fope.But this marke is fpirituali.
What hath oile to do with the fouler" Haue they forgottc that which
they oft chaunt to vs our of Auguftine , that if the word be taken
from the watefjit (lialbe nothing but water,and that it hath this from
the word that it is a Sacrament ? What word will they ihewe in their
fat liquor ? Will they (he we the commaundement the was geuen ta
Exo. 30 Mofes,concerningthe annointing ofthe fonnes of AaronrBut there
3*^ is alfo commaundcmet geuen, of the coate, the ephod,thc hatt.the
crowne of holineffe > with which Aaron vas to be garnifhcd, and of
the coates.girdles, and miters, wherewith the fonnes of Aaron were
to be clothed. There is commaundement geuen to kill a calfe , and
burne the fat of him for incenfe yto cut rammes and burne them, to
fandifie their eares and garments with the blood of an other ramme,
and innumerable other obferuations , which being paffed ouer, I
maruell why the onely annointing of oile pleafeththem. But if they
loue to be fprinkled , why are they rather fprinklcd with oile than
with blood ? Forfoth they go about a witty thing, to make one reli-
gion of Chriftianitie, Icwifhnefle, and Paganifme ,as it were of pat-
ches fowed together . Therefore their annointing ftinketh which is
without the fait , that is, the word of God. There rcmaineth laying
on of handes , which as I graunt in true and lawful! Ordcrings to be
a Sacrament, fo I deny that it hath any part in this play , where they
neither obey the commaundement of Chrift»iior haue cdpet^ to the
cnde
ToSaluation, Lib.4. ^18
cnde whcreunto the promife ought to leade vslf they will not hauc
ihe (jgne denied them, they muft apply it to the thingii felfe, wher-
unto It is appointed.
3 1 About the order alfo of Deaconrie I would not ftriuc with
them , if that fame miniftcnc which was m the Apoities time and in
the purer Church were reftored to the vnconupted Itate thereof.
But what hke th^ng haue they whom thofe men bmc to be deacons?
1 fpcake not of the men (leaft they fliould coplainc that the dotftrinc
is wrongfully weycd by the faultes of the menne) but I afhrme that
for thofe wliom they deliuer vs by their dodrinc ,thcy vnworthily
fetclie teftimonie from the example of ihem whom the Apoftolikc
Church ordemed Dcacons.Thcy fay that it perteineth to their dea-
cons to ftand by the priefts , to minifter m alt thmgs that arc done in
the Sacraments, namely inBaptifme, in the chrefmc , in the patine,
in the chaJicc: to bringin the oft'rings and lay them vpon the altar,
to make ready the Lordes table, and to couer it : to carry the Crofle,
to pronounce and fing the Gofpell and Epiftle to the people. Is here
anyone word of the true minifterie of Deacons ? Nowcletvs hcare
the inftituting of them.Vppo the Deacon that is ordercd,the Bifhop
alone Jayeth his hande. He layeth a prayer boke and a Stoale vpon
his lefce lhoulder,that he may vnderftande that he hath rcceiued the
hgh t yoke of the Lordc,whereby he may fubdue to the fcarc of God
thofe thinges that perteine to the left fide. He geueth him the texte
of the Gofpell, that he may pcrceiuehimfelfe robe a publilherof
it. And what belong thefe things to Deacons ? They do euen like as
if a man would fay that he ordcincd them ApotHes whom heap-
pointed oncly to burne frankincenfe,to trimme the lmages,to fwepe
the Churches, to catche mife,to driue away dogs. Who could fuffer
fuch kinde of men to be called Apoftles , and to be compared with
the very Apoftles of Chrift? Therefore let them not hereafter licng-
ly fay that thofe be Deacons , whom they inftitute onely for their
cncerludelike playcs. Yea & by the very name ir felfe they fufficietly
declare what maner of office they hauc. For they call them Leuitcs,
and will haue their order and beginninge referred to the children
ofLeui. Which I gcue them Icaue to do , lb that chey do not after-
ward garnifh them with the fcthcis of other.
3 J OF Subdcacons to what purpofe is it to fpeake /For whcrcaj
in deede they were in olde time appointed for care of the poorc,thcy
artignc to them I wote not what trifling bulinefle , as to bring the
chalice and the patinc,the litle cruet with watcr,and the towel to the
alur»to powre water to waihe handcs,&c.Nowc wheras chey fpeakc
Hi I V
Cap.i^. Of the ounvarde mcancs
ofrccciuing and bringing in of ofFring$,theymcanc thofcwfiifh
they dcuourc as abandoned to their holy vfe. Wuh this office very
well agrccth the forme of their confecrating. That he rccciue of the
Bifhop,the patincand the chalice: of the Archdeacon, the cruet
With watcr,thc manuale,and fuch other baggage. Within thcfe trifles
they require to haue vs confeffe that the holy Ghoft is enclofed.
What godly man can abide to graunt thi$?But,to make ones an ende,
wcmay determine the fame of them that we doof the reft. Neither
ficede we to repcte further thofc things that are aboue declared.
This may be enough to teach the fober and willing to learne (whom
I hsuc taken m hand to inftrud) that there is no Sacrament of God
bur where is fhewedaCeremonic ioincdwith a promife : or rather
verily but where is a promiie fenc in a Ccremonie.Here is not found
onefyliable of any certain promife: therefore it were in vaincto
fcke aCeremonicto confirmethe promife . Againe of thofe Cere-
monies that they vCc , it is not red that any one i$ inftitute of God.
Therefore here can be no Sacrament.
of Mittrmonie.
?4 The laft is Matrimonic , which as all men confcffe to be or-
dcined of God,to no man vntill the time of Gregorie cucr fawe thaC
it was geuen for a Sacrament. And what fober man would euer h:iuc
thought it ? It is a good and a holy ordinance of God ; fo tillage,
carpcntriejihocmakers craft,barbers craftjare lawfull ordinances of
God,and yet they arc no Sacramcnti. For there is not oncJy this re-
quired in a Sacramentjthat it be the worke of God, but that i; be an
outward Ccrcmonic appointed of God to confirme a promife. That
there is no fuch thing in Matrimonie , very children alfo can iucige.
But (fay they) it is a Signc of a holy thing, that is , of the fpirituall
conioining of Chrift with the Church. 1 f by this word Signc , they
vndetftande a Token fct before vs of God , to this ende to raife vp
'^^' the alfuredneffe of our faith, they are farrc bcfidc the triith. If they
i^nc * I. ^nipiy take a Signe for that which is brought to cxprefle a ftiriilitude,
! » ana 1 will fhcwe howe wirrily they reafon. Paule faith, As one ftarre dif-
\y fereth fiom an other ftarc in brightneffc , fo fhalbe the refurredion
-^^•40. <^f jj^P dead. Lo here is one Sacrament. Chrift faith, The kingdomc
;fa ,^j of hcauen isliketoagrainof muftardfede. Lohcreis another. A-
3. gsinc , The kmgdome of heauen is like vnto leauen, Lo here is the
• Thef. third. Efay faith, Be hold, the Lord (liall feede his flocke as a fhcpherd.
'*' Lohere is thcfowenh. In an other place,TheLorde{hall go forth
oj^i^* asa Gtant. Lohere is thefifith. Finally what ende or meafure (hall
(. ' dicire bc^There is nothing but by this meane it ihail be a Sacrament.
Howe
To Saluation. Lib.4. ^rp
Howe many pariibJei and fimilicudes are m the Scripture, fom.Tny
Sacraments there th;ilbc. Yea and theft fh.ilbe a Sacramentjbecsuic
it IS wriitcn.thc day of the Lordishke a thefc. Who cm abulc thefe Anty.
fophiftcrs prating Co foohthly ? I graunt in deede that fo oft as we fee c^"*
a vinCfir is very f?.ood to call totemembrace that which Chiilt !ait!i, ^[ji'J*'^*
lam 3 vine, yc be br.inche$,my F.uhcns the vincdreffer. So oft as a vverh
fheplicrdc with hi-, flocke comcth toward vs, it is good alfo that this vvclle
come to our minde,! am a good rtiephcrdjmy Hicpc heare my voice, hot , a
Bur if any man addc fuch limilKudcs to the number of Sacramentes, ■JJJ^^jj.
hcis mete tobefentto Antycira. - uo^or
35 But iheyftiU lay fourth the wordes of Paule,inwhich he p!ircn<
gcuech to Matrimonic the name of a Sacrament : he that lousta his ^'^*^,
Wife , louerh himfelfc. No man euer hared his owne fJcHi , bur nc>u- j^^J*^^!*
rifncth it and cheriflicth it,euen as Chrift doth the Church rbecaiue ,^^
*ve arc roembcrsofhisbody ,of his flcllieandof hisbonex. For this
a man fliall leaue his Father and mother, and iliali clcaue to his wife,
and they flialbc two into one flertie. This is a grea: Sacrament ; bu«
I fay in Chi id and the Church. But foto handle the Scriptures, is
fo mingle hcaucn and earth together. Paulc,to fl-^ewc to maricd
men, what fingular loue they ought to bcarc to their wiues , fetceth
fourth Chrift to them for an example. For as he poured fourth the
bowels of his kindenefle vpon the Church which he hadcfpoufed
to himfelfe : fo ought eucry man to be affcdioncd toward his ovmc
wife. It followeth after. He thatloueth his wife , ioucth himfelfe : as
Chrift loucd the Church. Nowc , to teache howe Chrift loued the
Church as himfelfe , yea howe he made himfelfe one with his fpoufe
the Church , he applieth to him thofe things which Mofes repor- *^"' *'
leth that Adam fpake of himfelfe. For when Eue was brought into
his light, whom he knewe to haue bene (hapcn out of his fide : This
woman ( faith he ) is a bone of my bones , and fleftie of my flcfhe,
Paule tcftificth that all this was fpiritually fulfilled in Chrift ?.nd vs,
when h e fayeth that we are membres of his body , of his flcihc , and
of his bones, yea and oneflcfticwith him. At length he addeth a
coduding Sentece,This is a great miftery.And leaft any man ihould
be dcceiucd with the double hgnifying of the wordcs,he exprefleth
that he fpcaketh not of the flefhely conjoining of man and woman,
but of the fpirituall mariagc of Chrift and rhc Church. And truely it cialat.
is in deede a great miftcrie,that Chrift fnftrcd a ribbe to be take from z. so,
bimfclfc , whereof we might be fhapcn r that is to fiy, when he was
ftrog.he willed to be wreake, that we might be ftcensjthcned with his
(Urcngth: that nowe we may not our felucs liuc, but he may hue iji ^f*
IIII iij
Cap.ip. Of the outward meanes
36 The name of Sacrament deceiued them. But was it rightfull
that the whole Church lliouldfufTer the punifliment of their igno-
rance ? Paule faid Mifteric : which word when the tranflater might
haue lefte being nor vnufed with Latin cares, or might haue tranfla-
ted It a Secret : he chofe rather to put in the word Sacrament , yet
in no other fenfe than Paul had in Greke called it Mifterie. Now lee
them go and with crying out railc againft the fkill of tongcs,by igno-
rance whereof they haue fo long moft fovvly bene blindc in an caly
matter,and fuch as oiTrcth it felfe to be pcrceiued of euery man. But
why do they in this one place fo earncftly fticke vpon this Lde word
Sacrament , and fomc other times do pafie it oucr vnregarded ? For
I.Tim, alfo in the tirrt EpiUle to Timothee the Tranflater hath vfed it , and
?• ^' in the felfe fame Epiftle to the Ephefiansrin euery pl.ice for Miftcrie.^-
P ^'*' But let this flipping be pardoned themtatlcaft the liers ought to
Libr.4.haue had a good remembrance. For, when they haue ones let out
Senten. Mattimonie with title of a Sacrament , afterward to coll it vncjcan-
Dift. »7 nefle, defiling, and flcflily filthinefl'e , howe giddy lightneiTe is this?
&^iT^' ^°^^ S'^"^ ^^ ablurditic is it to debarrc priefts from a Sacrament?
ipec.jy If they deny that they debarre them from the Sacrament, but from
quell. 2. the luft of copulation : they efcapc not fo away from me. For they
cap.Cu teachethat the copulation it \'e\{c is a part of the Sacrament, and
^^"^^' that by it alone is figured the vniting that we haue with Chritl in con-
fcx diu. foriTiitie of nature : bccaufc man and woman arc- not made one but
Ibid, bycarnall copulation. Howbeit fome of them haue here founde
Dccre. j^q Sacraments ; the one of God and the foule , in the betrouthcd
1"' • ^* man and woman : the other of Chi ift and theChurch,in the husbad
- cap. ^"^ ^^^ ^^^^' Howfoeuer it be , yet copulation is a Sacrament , from
3. & in wbichit wasvnlawfull that any Chriftian fliouldbe debarred :Vn-
decr.}2 lefle pcraduenturc the Sacraments of Chnftians do foil! agree, that
quaft.i jj^gy ^gj^ j^Qj ftand together.Thcre is alfo an other abfirdine in their
quid? ^ dodrines. They affirme thatin the Sacrament is gcuen the grace
of the holy Ghoft: they teachc that copulation is a Sacrament: and
they denie that at copulation the holy Ghoft is at any time prefent.
j7 And , becaufe they would not fimply mocke the Cliurch,
howe long a roawe of crrours , lies , dcceites , and wickednisflcs haue
theyknittc to one error ?fo that a man may fay , that they did no-
thing but feke a dcnne o( abhominations , when tlicy made of ma-
trimonie a Sacramcnt.For when they ones obteined this,they drew
tothemlelues the hering of caufesof matrimony : for it wa^iafpi-
fituall matter, which profane iudges might not medic with. Then
they made lawes, whereby they ftabiiihcd their tyrannic , but thofc
.; I partly
To Saliiation. Lib.4, .- ^20
partly manifcftly wicked againft God , and partly moft vniuft toward
men. As arc thcfc : That manages made betwcenc yong pcriones
without confent of their parcntcs,lhoulde remaine of force and (la-
blilhcd. That the mariagesbe not Jawfull betweene kinsfolkes to
the feucnth degree : and if any fuch be made , that they be diuorced.
And the very degrees they faine againft the lawesof all nations,
and againft the ciuilc goucrnnvent of Mofes. That it be notlawefull Dcnte.
for a mannc that hath put away an adultcrefle , to mary an other. * •*^"
That fpirituall kinsfolkes may not bee coupled in mariage. That
there be no mariages celebrate ,from Septuagefimc tothevtasof
Eaftcr, in three weekcs before Mjdfommer , nor from Aduentto
Twclftide. And innumerable other hkc , winch it were long to re-
herfe. At length we muft crepe out of their mire, wherein our talks
hath nowe taried longer than I would. Yet I thinke I haue fojr.e^
what profited , that I haue partly plucked the lions f kinnes from
chefe alTes.
The XX. Chapter.
of ciuile Gouernement.
NOwc whereas wc haue abouc fee two kindes of gouernc-
ment in man : and whereas we haue fpokcn enough of the
one kinde which cofifteth in the foule or in the inward man,
and hath rcfpcdtoetcrnall life : this place requircth that
we fpeake fomwhat alfo of the other,which pcrteineth onely to the
ciuile and outward righteoufnefieofmaners. For the courfcol: this
matter feemeth to be feuered from the fpirituall dodrine of faith,
which I toke in handc to cntrcate of: yet the preceding fhoil fiiewe
that I do rightfully ioine them together , yea that I am of nceflii.ic
compelled to do it : fpecially fith on the one fide , mad and barba-
rous men do furioufly go about to oucrthrowe this order ftablifhcd
by Gpd : and on the other fide the flatterers of princes , aduauncing
their power without mcfurcjfticke not to fet it againft the empire of
God himfelfe.Vnlefle both thefe mifchcues be met withal,the purc-
ncfle of faith iTiall bcIoft.Bcfidcthatitisnot fmally forour behofe,
to knowe howe Icuingly God hath in this bchalfe prouided for ma-
kinde, that there may flonflie in vs a greater defire o£ godlinelTe to
witnefle our thankfulntfTe , firft , ere wc enter into the thing it fclfe,
we muft holde faft that diftindtion which we haue aboue ^ct^ leaft (as
it commonly happeneth to many) wc vnwifely mingle thcfe two
things together, which haue altogecherdiuerfe confideration. For
II II iiij
Cap,
.20. Of the outward mcancs
whe they hearc that liberty is promifcd by y GofpeI,which acknow-
ledgcth amongc men no king and no magiftiatc , but hath rcgardc
to Chrift alone ; they thinke that they can take no fruit of their h-
berticjfo long as they fee any power to haue preeminccc ouer them.
Therefore they thmke that nothing fhalbe fafe , vnlcffc the whole
world be reformed into a newe fafliion-.where may neither be iudgc-
mets,nor lawcs,nor masiftrats,nor any fuch thing which they thinke
to withllande their hberticBut whofoeuer can put differccc betwcne
the body and tlir foule, betwene this prefent and tranHtorie life, and
that life to come and eternall : he ftiall not hardly vnderftjtnde that
the fpirituall kingdome of Chrift , and the ciuile gouern^ment arc
thinges far a fonder.Sith therefore that is a lewifli vanitie, to fcke Sc
cndofe thekingdomc of Chrift vnder the elements of this world:
let vs rather thinking , as the Scripture plainely reacheth , that it is a
fpirituall fruit,which is gathered of the hcncHte of Chnft,rcmember
to kcpe within the boundes thereof this whole hbertie which is pro-
Gal. M mifcd & offred vs in him.For,what is the caufc why the fame ApoftJe
1. Cor. which biddeth vs to ftande, and not to be made fubiede to the yoke
7*-' of bondage,m an other place forbiddeth bond feruantes to be care-
full of their ftate: but becaufe fpirituall libeiticmay very well agree
Gala. $. with ciuile bondage f In which fenfc alfo thcfc his fayings are to be
^- taken: In the kingdome of God there is no lewc, nor Grecian , no
^^ ^* male nor female , no bondcman nor freeman. Agnine , There is no
lew nor Grecian,Circumcifiom, Vncircumcifi6,Barbarian,Scy:hian,
Bondm an, Freman: but Chrift IS allin all. Whereby he fignifieth,
that It maketh no matter in what eftate thou be among men, nor
vnder thcla'.vcs of what nation thouliueftcforafmuch as inthefc
thmgs confifteth not the kingdome of Chrift.
> Yet doth not this diftindion tcndc hereunto , that we fliould
thinke that the whole order of policie is an vndeanc thing.noi ptr-
teining at all to Chnftis men.So in deede do the phrennke men,that
are dehtcd with vnbridled liccntioufntfle , crie out r*nd boft. For (kh
we be dead by Chrift to the elements of this world, & being remoued
into the kingdome of God do fit among the heaucnly ones : they
thinke that it is vnworthy for vs, and farrc beneth our exccilence>to
be occupied with tbefc prophaneand vncleanecares that are buficd
about affaires not perteining to a Chriihan man. Tov/hatpurpofc
(fay they) are lawcs without iud cements and iudgcment feates?Eut
whathath aCbriftt^n man to do with ludgemenis thcmfelucs? yea if
it be not lawfull to kill , wherto feiue Uwes and iudgcments among
VS i But as we haue euen nowe geuen warning , thac this kinde of
y goucra-
ToSaliiation. Lib.4. ^21
goucrnmcnt is feuerall from chat fpirimall and inward kingdome of
Chri(t:fo it is alfo to be knowen that they nothing difagrce together.
For the Ciuile gouernment doth now beginnc in vs vpon earth cer-
taine beginnings of the hcauenly kingdom , and in this mortal! and
vanifninghfcjdoth as it were entrc vpon an immortall and incorrup-
tible biciledncfle : but the entcn: ot this fpirituall gouernment is , Co
long as we fhall hue amonge men, to cheri(h and maintaine the out-
ward worlhipping of God, to defend the found dodrinc of godhnes
and the f»ate of the Chiirch,io frame our hfe to the fclowfliip of me,
to faOno our maners to ciuii nghtcoulnes , ro procure vs into frcnd-
fiiip one with an other, to nourifhc common peace and quiecncs;all
which I graunttobe fuperfiuous,if the kingdom ofGod/uch as it is
naw among vs , do deftroy this prefent hfc. But if the will of God be
fo.that wc while we longc toward the heaucnly countrcy, fhould be
wayfaringe from home vpon the earth : & (ith the vfc of fuch wayfa-
ringe nedeth fuch helpes : they which take them from man, do take
from him his very nature of man. For whereas th%y allcage that there
is fo great perfcdion in the Church of God,that her ownc moderate
gouernment fuffifeth it for a lawrthey theJ clues do foolillily imagine
that perfection which can neuer be found in the common felowfhip
of men.For iith of naughty men the pride is fo great, & the wicked-
ncsfoobftinate,ascanotbercftrained with great lliarpr.es of bwes:
what thmke we that they will do, if they fee vnpuniihcd liberty lye
open to their Icwdncs , which can not cucn with force be fufficicncly
compelled not to do cuill?
g Bu: of the order of policy , there (halbc an other fitter place to
entreare.Now our meaning is to hauc this onely vnderftanded.thaC
to thinke to di iue it avvay,is outragious barbaroufncfle,the vfe whcr-
of is no lefle amonge mcn,than of bread,watcr,the funnc,& aire,buc
the digniry much more excellent. For it tendeth not only hereunto
( which is the oncly commodity of all thofc thingcs ) that men may
bre2rh,C3tc,diinS:e & be cheriflied (although in dede it comprehen-
dcth all (hefc thingcs , v/hile it maketh that they hue together)y ct I
fay,it ledeth not hereunto only:but alfo y idolatry, facrileges ngaii^.ft
the name of God, blafphemics againft his trueth, and other offences
of religion may not rife vp and be fcattcrcd amonge the pcoplc,chat
common quiet be not troublcJ, that cuery man may keepe his ownc
fafc and vnappeircd , that men may vfc their affaires together with^
out hurt, that honefty and modcily be kept among them;finally that
amonge Chriftians may be a common (hew ot'religion,and amonge
men may be manlike ciuiliry. Neither Ice any ma be ixioued/pr thac
Cap.2o. Of the outwardc meanes
I do now rcfcrrc the care of ftablifliinge of religion to the policy of
mcn,which I feme before to haue fct without the iudgemcnt of me.
For I do np more here, than I did before, giue men leaue after theic
ownc will to make lawcs concerning religion and the worfliippmge
of God, when I allowe the ordinance of poUicy, which endeuoreth
hercunto,thaty true religion which is contained'in the law of God,
be not openly and with pubhke facrileges freely broken and deHled.
But the readers beinge holpen by the very plainneflc of order , fhall
better vnderftande what is to be thought of the whole kinde of ciuile
gouernment , if we feuerally entreat of the partes thereof. There be
three parts of it:the magiftrate,which is the goucrnour and kepcr of
the lawc$,y lawes according to which he goucrncthty peoplc,wbic}i
are gouerned by the lawes,& obey y magiftrate.Therforc let vs firft
confider of the office of the Magiftrate, whether it be a lawfull voca-
tion & allowed of God, what maner of office he hath, & how great is
his powerrthcn with what lawcs a Chriftian ciuilc ftate is to be orde-
red:then laft of all, w^at profite of the lawcs commcth to the people,
what rcuercnce is due to the Magiftrate.
4 The Lorde hath not only teftified that the office of magiftratcs
is allowed & acceptable to him,but alfo fctting out the dignity ther-
of with moft honorable titles , he hath marueloufly commended it
ixo.ai vnto vs.That I may rehcarfe a fewc of them. Whereas whofocuer be
I, in place of magiftrates arc named gods,let no ma thinke that in that
>ra. 8 1, oaminge is fmall importance : For thereby is fignitied that they haue
* commaundcmet from God, that they are furniffied with the autho-»
rity of God,& do altogether beare the perfon of God,whofc fteede
they do after a certainc maner fupply.This is not my cauilIaiion,buE
, , the expofition of Chrift. If the Scripture (faith he)called them gods
J 5/ * to whom the word of God was giuen: What is this cife,but that God
hath committed his bulinefic to them , that they fhoulde ferue in his
Deut.i. office,& (asMofes and lofaphat faid to their iudgeswhom they ap-
1 6 pointed in cuery feuerall city of luda ) that they fbould fit in iudgc -
i.Chro. ment,r50t forma but for God?To the fame purpofe maketh this that
*^*^* thewifdomofGodaffirmeth by the mouth of Salomon, that it is his
worke, that kinoes reigne, and counfcllcrs decree righteous thinges,
Prou,?. that Princes beare princip3lity,and al the iudges of the earth execute
' ^* iudgcmcnt.For this is all one in cffi:ft as if it had bin fayd, that it Co-
meth not to paffe by the peruerfcneflc of men , that the gouernment
of al things in earth is in the had of kings & other Rulers,but by the
prouidence and holy ordinance of God , to whom it fo Teemed good
to order the matters of menne: forafmuch as he is both prefent and
preiidco;
To Saluation. Lib.4. 6l^
prtfidcnt among them jn making of lawes and m executing vpright-
ncfle of iudgementes. Which Paul alfo plainely leacheth , when he Roni.i»
rcckcncth GouernmcntesamongthegiftcsofGoci,whichbtingdi- 8,
uerfly di0fibu,tcd accordinge to the diuerfity of grace, ought to be
employed <>f the fcruants of Chr ilt to the edification of the Church.
For although he there properly fpcakcth of a councell of graue men,
which in the Primitjuc Church were appointed that they fhoulde
haue the rule of orderingc the publike dirciphne(vvhich office in the
Epiftlcto the Corinthjans he calleth Gouernmet) yet forafmuch as i.Cor.
W€ fee thax the ende of ciuile power commeth to the fame point,it is 1 2.18.
no dout but that he commendeth vnto vs all kinde of iuft Gouern-
cnenc. But he fpcaketh more plainely, where ne purpofcly maketh a
full difcourfe of that matter.For he both llieweth that Power is y or- „
dinance of God,and that there are no powers, but they arc ordained
of God:and that the Princes themfelues arc the miniiJers of God, to
the wel doers vnto praife:io y cuil,rcuengcrs vnto wtath. Hereunto
may be added alfo the examples of holy menne:of which fome haue
pc^eircd kitigdom-cs, as Dauid, lofias, Ezechias : other (bmc,Lord-
ihips, as lofephand Daniel! ; other Ibme , Ciuile gouernmentes in a
free people,as Mofes,]o(ue,and the ludges.'whofc offices the Lorde
hath declared that he alloweth. Wherforcnonc ought now todouc
that the ciuile power is a vocation not only holy and lawful! before
Godj but alfo the moft holy, and the molt honeil: of all other in the
whole life of men.
5 They which couet to bring in a ^ai^ without Rulers , take ex-
ception and fay that although in old time there were kings & ludgcs
ouer the riide people, yet at this day that feruile kinde of gouerningc
agrceth not with the perfedion which Chrift hath brought with his
Gofpell . Wherein they bewray not onely their ignorance , but alfo
their deuilifh pride, while they take vppon themfelues perfcdionjof
which not fomuch as thchundrethpartis feenc inthem. But what
mancr of men fbcuer they be,it is eafic to confute it : bccaufe where
Dauid exhorteth all kinges and Rulers tokiflethe fonneofGod,he Pf.3,ta,
doth not bid them, giuinge ouer their authority,to ftakc themfelues
to a priuate life , but to fubmit the power that they bcare to Chrift,
that he alone may haue preeminence nbouc all. Likewife Efayjwhcn Era.49,
he promifcthy kings flialbefoftcrfathersofthc Church, &Quencs *5«
flialbe nourfcSjhc doth not dcpofe them from their honor:but rather
doth by an honorable title make them defenders to the godly wor-
fhippcrs of God.^For, that prophecy pertaincth to the comminge of
Chrift . I do wutingcly pafte ouer many teftimonies which do cche
Cap.2o. Of the outward mcancs
fifherc offer thcmfclucs , & fpccially in the Pfalmcs wherein all go-
ucrnours haue their right maintained. But moil clearc of all is the
place of Paul,whcre admonidiing Timothee that in the common af-
Tembly praiers muft be made for king$,he byandby addcth a reafon,
i.Tim.a That we may vndcr them lead a quiet hfe with all godlines & hone-
st fty : in which wordes he committcth the ftate of the Church to their
defenfe and fauegarding.
6 Which conGderation ought continually to bu(ic the magiftratcs
themfelueSjforafmuch as it may put a great fpurrc to them whereby
they may be pricked forward to their ducty,and bring them a fingu-
lar comfort whereby they may mitigate the hardnelfes of their of*
fice, which truely are both many and great. For with howc great an
cndeuourofvpnghtnefrejwifdom,mildncirc,conrinencc,andinno«
ccncy, ought they to charge themfelues, which know thcmfclucs to
be appointed miniftcrs of the righteoufnes of God?By what affiance
ihall they admit vniuOice to their iudgcment feate, which they hcarei
to be the throne of the liuinge God ? By what boldenelTe fhall they
pronounce a wrongful fentcnce with that mouth,which they vnder-
ftand to be appointed an inftrumet for the truth of God? With whac
confcience fliall they fubfcribcto wicked decrees with the handc,
which they knowe to be ordained to wryte the ades of God Mn a
fummc,if they remember that they be the vicegercntes of God,they
muft watch with all carc,carneftncffc , and diligence , that they may
rcprcfent in thcmfclucs vnto men a certaine image of the prouidecc,
prefcruation^goodnefle* good will, and righteoufnefle of God. And
Iere.48 ^^^y "^"^ continually fct this before their eies,that if all they be ac-
gi, curfedjthat do execute in dcccite the worke of the vcngeacc of God,
they are much more greuoufly accurfcd, that vfe themfelues deceit-
fully in a rightfull vocation. Therefore when Mofcs & lofaphat min-
ded to exhort their iudges to their duty ,thcy had nothing more effc-
duall to moue their mindcs withall,than that which we haue before
Deut.i. rehearfed , Looke what ye do . For yc fit in iudgement not for man
1 6. but for God : namely he which is neere to you in the caufe of iudge-
xChro. menu Now therefore let the fearc of the Lorde be vpon you. Looke
prf\ & be diligcnt:becaufe there is no peruerfencs with y Lord our God.
Efay'}. And in an other place it is faid,y God ftode in y affembly of the gods,
14 & fitteth judge in the middeft of the gods , that they may be encou-
raged to their duety when they hcare f they be the deputies of God,
to whome they muft one day yeclde accompt of the gouernment of
their charge. And worthily this admonitio ought to be of great force
with them. For if they make any default, they are hqc Qnely wrong©
ToSaluation. Lib.4, ^25
docs to men whom they wickedly vcxe, but aifo fclaudcrcrs to Go4
himfclfe.whorc holy ludgcmcnics they dcfilc.Againcthcy hauealfo
whereupon they may lingularly comfort thcmfclues,whcn they co-
(ider with themfclucs that they arc not buficd m prophane affaires St
fuch as arc not fitte tor theicruant of God, bi5C in a molt holy office,
namely forafmuch as they arc the deputies of God.
7 As for them that are not moued with fo many teftimonics of
Scripcurc from being bolde to railc at this holy miniltcry.as a thingc
difagrccmg with Chr:lhan religion and godlineirc:what do they clfa
but railc at God hinifclfc,ihe djfhonor of whom can not but be ioi-
ned with the reprochc of his minifter ? And verily ihey do not refufc
the magiitratcsjbut do caft away God ,that he lliouide not rcignc o-
uer them. For if the Lord fayd this trucly of the people of Ifraeljbc-
caufe ibey had rcfufed thcgouernmcntof Samuehwhy fhal it be Icflc ^•^*''*'*
truelv fayd at this day of ihcm that glue thcmfcluesleauc to rage a-
gsinlf all goucrnmcmes ordained of God ? But fith the Lord fayd to
the drioplcs^that the kings of nations bearc rule oucr thcm,but that tuc.ia
amongeihcmitisnotfojwhcrchethstis thcfirftmuftbcmadcthc ij^
li::iih by this layingc it is forbidden to all Chriftians that they fnouldc
not take kingdomcs or gouernmentes vpon them . O handfomc ex*
poluors. There rofc a llrife among the difciples , which of them ex-
celled otber:the Lord, to fuppreffe this vainc ambition, taught them
that ihcir miniltery is not like vnto kingdomcs,in which one manne
hath preeminence abouc the reft. I bcfcchc you,whac doth this com-
pirifon make to y dilhonor of kingly dignity? yea what doth it prouc
at allibut that the mmiilery of an Apoflle is not the office of a kinge?
Moreoucr although among the magiftratcs themfelucs there be di-
uerfe formes,yet there is no difference in ths behalfc, but y we ought
to take them all for the ordinances of God. For Paul alfo doth com- Rom.!}
prchend them altogether^when he fayth that there is no power but i.
of Godtand that which beft liked him of all,is commended with no-
table teftimony aboue the ocher,namely the power of one:which be-
caufe it bringeth with it a common bondage of all , ( except that one
nian,to whole will it maketh all thingc? (ubied ) in olde time couldc
Icffe be allowed of noble and the excellent forte of natures. But the Prou.1.
Scripture, to meete with their vniuft iudgementes , exprefly by name ' 5*
affirmeth, that it is the prouidencc of Gods wifdome that kingcs do **^"***
rcigne.and peculiarly commaundeth the king to be honored. '*
8 And ttuely it were very vaine that it fhoulde be difputed of pri-
uatc men, which fhoulde be the btft ftatc of policy in the place where
they Uuc;for whome it is not lawful! to conlUit of the framing of an/
Gap.2o. Of the outward meancs
common wcale. And alfo the f;)me could not be fimply determined
without rarhneSjforaSmnch as a great paicc of the order of this que-
ftion confiftcth in circumthnccs. And if ihou compare alfo the dates
thcmfelues together without circilftanees, itlLallnocbc cafie to di-
fcerne which of them ouerweieth the other in profitablcnefl'e , th«y
match i'o egally together. There is an eafic way to fail tVom kingdom
into tyranny : but not much harder is it to fall from the rule cf the
chiefeft men to the fadion of a fewe : but moik caJie of all , from the
peoples goucrnment,tofedition.Truly,ifthofe three formes of i^o-
ucrnmentes which the Philofophers fet out , be confideredin them-
fclues, I will not deny that either the goucrnmet of the chiefeft me,
or a ftate tempered of it and common goucrnment far excclleth all
other;not of it felfe,but becaufe it moft leldom chaunccth that kings
fo temper themfelues,that their wil neuer fwaructh from that which
is iuft and right ,againe,that they be furnifhcdwith fo great lliarpe-
nefle of iudgement and vvifdom,that cuery one of the feeih fo much
as is fufficient. Therefore the fault or default of men maketh,that it is
fafer & more tolerable that many iLould haue the gouernment, that
they may mutually one helpe an other, one teach and admonifh an
othcr,and if any aduancc himrelfe hier than is mete, there may be o-
uerfeers and maifters to reftraine his wilfalneflc. This both hath aK
Way bm approucd by experience , and the Lord alfo hath confirmed
it with his authority^whc be ordained among the Ifraelites a gouern-
ment of the beft men very neerc vnto common iouernmenti at fuch
time as he minded to haue them in bcft eftate» till he brought foorth
an image of Chrift in Dauid. And as I willingly graunt that no kmdc
of goucrnment is more blefled than this , where liberty is framed to
fuch moderation as it ought to be , and is orderly ftabliilned to con-
tinu3ce;fo ! compt them alfo m.oft bleffed,thatmay enioy this eftatc:
& it they ftoutly and conft antly trauaill in preferuing and retainingc
it, I graunt that they do nothing againft their duety. Yea & the magi-
itrates ought with moft great dihgence to bend thcmrcUies hereunto,
that they fuffer not the liberty of the people , of which they arc ap-
pointed orouernourSjto be in any part mini{hcd,much IcfTe to be dif.
lolucd:if thev be ncghgent & litle careful th<rin,they are falfe Faith-
breakers in their office,& betraiers of their contrec.But if they would
bring this kinde to themfelucs,to whom the Lord hath appointed an
other forme of goucrnmcnt,fo that thereby they be moucd to defirc
a change, the very thinking thereof fhall not only befoolifii & fuper-
fluouSjbut alfo hu rtfull.But if thou bendc not thine cies only to one
city,buc looke about or behold the whole world togethcr,or at leaft:
fprcd
To Saluation. Lib.4. ^24
fpread abroadc thy fight into farther diftanccs of contrccs , withouc
dout thou ihaltfinde that this is not vnprofitably. appointed by the
prouidcnce of God>that diuerfc contrccs (hould be ruled by diuerfe
kindes of gouernmcnt. For as the elementes hange together but by
an vnegjil tempcraturejfo contreeSjalfo arc with their certainc ine-
quality very wcJl kept in order.Howbeit all thcfc things alfo are fpo-
kcn in vamc to them whom the will of the Lord (hall fatisfic. For if it
be his plcafurc, to fct kipges ouer kingdomcSjSenatcs or officers oucc
free cities, whomfoeucr he makcth rulers in the places where we arc
conuerfantjit is our ducty to fhcw our fclues yelding & obedient va-
to them.
9 Now y office of Magiftrats is in this place to be declared by the
way,oFwhat fort it is defcribcd by y word of God,& in what thingcs
it confifteth.If the Scripture did not tcach,that it cxtendeth to both
the tables of the law,wc might learnc it out of the prophanc writers.
For none hath entreated of the duety of magiftraies , of makingc of
lawes & of the publike weale,that hath not bcgon at religion and the
worfhipping of God. And fo haue they all cofefTedjthat no policy can
be happily framed, vnleflfe the firft care be of godlinesrand that thofc
lawcs be prcpofterous which neglecting the right of God,do prouide
only for men.Sith therforc with all the Philofophcrs rcligio hath the
firrt placcvind fith the fame haih alway bin obfcrucd by the vniucrfall
confent of al nations,Let Chriftia Princes & magiftrates be affiamcd
of their fldthfulneSjif they endeuor not thcmfelues to this care. And
we haue already ihewed, that this ducty is fpeciallyenioyned them
of God;a$ it is mete, that they (hould employ their trauail to dcfendc
& maintaine his honor, whofc viccgcrentcs they be,& b7 whofc be-
nefit they gouerne.For this caufc alio chiefly arc the holy kings prai*
fed in Scripturcjfor that they reftored the worlliip of God being cor-
rupted or ouerthrowen,or tooke care of rcligio, that it might florifti
pure and fafc vnder them . But contrariwife the holy hiftoric rcckc- lud.ai.
ncth ftates v/ithoutgouernours,amongcfault$,fayingthat there was 25.
no king in Ifracll,and that therforc euery man did what plcafed him-
felfe. Whereby their foUie is confuted,which would haue thcm,nc-
gleding the care of God,only to apply thcmfelues to be iudges of law
amonge men. As though God appointed gouernoursin his name to
decife cotroucrfies,& omitted that which was of much weightier im-
portaccjihat he himfelfe fhould be worfhipped according to the prc-
fcribed rule of his law. But a dc(irc to innouatc all things without pu-
ni(hmen% moueth troublefome men to this point,thatthcy wiflie all
reucnger s of the breach of peace to be cake away. As for fo much as
Gap,
.20. O f the outward mcancs
fer. a. pcrcameth tothcfccond tsblejcreiny \varnethkinges,to tfoiudger*
J*. menc and righteouTncire^to dciiuer the forceably opprclTed from the
hande of the falfe accufer , not to greue the ftraunger and widowe,
not to do wrong,and not to fhcd innocent blood. To tlie fame pur»
pofc inakeih the exhortation vrhich is read in the Si. Pfalmc , thac
they ihould render nght to the poorc and nccdyjacquite the poorc
and needy , dehuer the poore and needy from the hrmdeof the op-
prellor. And Mofes giucih charge to the Princes whom he had fctte
in his ftedcdet them lieare the caulc of their br€thren,and iudge bc-
Dcut I. twcnc a man and his brother and a ftraunger,and not know faces in
l^' iiidgementjet them heare as well thchtle as the great;and be not a-
- ' fraied of any man ; becaufe iti* the iudgcmcnt of God. But I fpeakc
not of thefe thinges : thac kmgcs fhould not get to themfclucs mul-
ti-udes of horfes,not caft tntir mindes to ccuetournefle,not behfccd
vpabouc their brethren; thsi ihcy msy be eoncinu?lly bufiedin ftu-
dy ing vpon the law of the Lord all the daycs of their lifc:tha: Judges
fwarue not to the one Cde , nor rectiue gifces : becaufe in declnrmgc
here the office of msgiftiates , my purpofe is not fo much toinftro^
the magiftratesthemlelues, as to teach other whatMagiftratcs bc,5i
to what cnde they are fet of Gcd. We fee therefore rhat they be or-
dained defenders and reuengers of innoccncCjmodefty,honcftyjand
quietnefle,whofc only cndcuor fhoulde be to prouide for the com-
?fa,ioi mon fafcty and peace o( all men. Of which vertues Dauid profefTc th
that he will be an examplar , when he fhalbe aduaunccd to the royaU
fcateithat is,that hcvvill not confent to any euill doingcs,but abhorrc
wicked mcn,fclaundcrcrs, and proude men, and get to himfcife from
cchewhere honeft and fait hfiill mcn.But fiihthey cannot pcrfi>rmc
this, vnleile they dcfende good m;.n from the wrongesof the cuill,
let them hclpe the good with fuccour and de fen fe,let them alio be ar-
med with power wherby they may feuerely fupprclfc open euil doers
and wicked men by whofe lewdnclTe the common quietc is troubled
or vexed.For we throughly Hnde this by expenece which Solon faid,
that common vveales confift of reward and punill:ment, & that when
thofe be taktnaw3y>the whole difcipline of cities faileth & is dilfol-
uedjFor the care of equity and iuftice waxeth colde in the mindes of
many , vnlcfic there be cue honor ready for vf rtue : neither can the
wilfulBeflTs of wicked men be rcftraincd but by fcueriiy and chalhfc-
fercai. nncnt of paines . And thefe two partes the Prophet comprehendeth,
'* ** when he biddeth kingcs and other gouernours to do iud'i^ement and
righteoufnefle.Rightcoufncs is,to take into charge of tuition,to em-
brace,to defendcito reucnge^to deliucr the innocent. Judgement is,
CO
ToSaluatiom Xib4. ^25
to withftand die boldncs of wicked men, to rcprcflc their violence*
to puniili their offences.
10 But hercas it fcemcih,doth arifc a hie and hard qucftion : If Exo. so
by the law of God all Chriftians are forbidden to kill : and the Pro- 1 3,
piict prophccieth of the holy mount of God,thatis,tbc Church,that Deut.5
in it they Ihal not sfflid nor hurt:how many magiftrates be together J^^'^^^
both godly and blood fhcders ? But if we vnderihndc,that the Ma- j,
giftratc in executing of puniOimcntcSjdoth nothing of himfelfc,buc Efa.ii.
cxccuteth the very Iclfe iudgemcntcs of God, we (hnll be nothinge 9-
combred with this dout . The la we of the Lor dc forbiddeth to kill: f^^^*
leaft manflaughcer Ihould be vnpuniflied,the law maker himfclfe gi-
ucth to the minjfters the fwerd in their hand^which they ihold draw
foorth againft all manfley ers.To afflid and to hurt, is not the doing
of the godly: but this is not to hurt,norto afflid,by the Lordes com-
maundemet to rcuengc the afflictions of the godly. I would to God
that this were alway prefent before our mindcs,that nothing is here
done by the rarncntfie of man , but all thinges by the authority of
God that commaundeth, which goinge before vs, we ncuer (warue
out of the right way . VnlelTe pcrhappcs there be a biidle pot vpon
the righteouiiies ot God,that it may not punifh wicked doings.But if
it be not iawfuU to appoint any law to it > why ftiall we cauili againft
the minifters of it?They bcarc not the fwerd in vaine, faith Patilc.for ^^'^ 3*4
they be the minifters of God to wrath,rcucnger» to euil docrs.Thcr-
fore if Princes and other rulers know that nothing (halbe more ac-
ceptable to God than their obcdiencc,let them apply this minifterie,
if they define to (hew their godhncflc,rightcoufneflc, & vncorrupt-
nclTc allowable to God. With this affedion was Mofes ledde, when
knowing him fclf appointed by the power of tlie Lord to be the deli-
uererofhispcoplejhc laid his hads vpon the i^gyptia. Againe,whcn Exod.»
by fl.iying of three thoufand men in one day, he tookc vengeance of "•
the facrilegc of the people. Dauid alfo, when nye to the cnde of his ^j ''^'
life he gane commaundcment to Salomon his fonne to £lay loab & Exa j a
Scmei . Whereupon he alfo rehearfeth this smongc the vcrtues of a 27.
kingjto flay the wicked of thclandc,that all workers of wickedneflc, ••K'"E»
may be driucn cut of the city of God.To which purpofe alio pertai- **^*
neth y praifc that is giue to Salomon,Thou haft loued rightcoufncs
and haft hated wickednefl'e. Howe doth that mildc and tedc nature
of Mofes burnc out into fo great cruelty,that beinge fprinkeled and
cmbrucd with the blood of his brcthren,he runneth throughout the
campe to new flaughters?How doth Dauid, a man of fo great genilc-
nes inaihis life,among his laft breathmgs make that bloody ceftamcCs
KKKK
Cap.2 o. Of the outward mcancs
that his fonnc (liouldc not bringc the hoarc hcare of loah and Se-
mei in peace to the grauc ? But they both when they executed the
vengeance committed to them of God/o fandified with crucll dca-
linge their handes which they had defiled with fparingc.Tt is an ab-
'ro i6. homination with kingcs, fayth Salomon, to do iniquity, becaufe hi«
%, throne is ftablUhcd in rightcoufnefle. Againc , The king which fit-
•ro »o. tcth m the throne of iodgcment, fpredeth his eyes vpon eucry euill
I* man. Againe, A wife king fcattereih the wicked and turneth them V-
^. ' ' pen the wheic . Againe , Take away the droffe from the filucr and
'ro.2S. there (hall come foorth a veffell to the melter.'takc away the wicked
man from the fight of the king,and his throne fhalbe faft fet in righ-
*ro««7» teoufncffc. Agame , He that iuftifieth the wicked , and he that con-
ro.i7 «Jcmncth the rightcouSjboth are abhomination to the Lord. Againc,
I. A rebellious man purchafeth emll to himfelfe,and a cruel mefTengcr
•ro. 14. is fcnt vnto him. Againe , who fo faith to the wicked man , thou art
'4» righteouSjhim peoples and nations do curfe. Now if their true righ-
teoufneflc be > with drawenfwerd to purfue gilty and wicked men:
let them put vp their fwerdjand holde their hands pure from bIood»
while ia the mcane time defperatc menne do ranee with rourthers
andflaughters : then they (hall make themfelues gilty of nioft great
wickedneffe, fomuch leffe{haU they gettc thereby the praifcof
goodneffc and righteoufneflc.Only let there be no prccife and cruel
rigoroufncffc,and that iudgcment featc which may worthily be cal-
Icdthe rocke of accufed men. Fot I am not he that either fauour ex-
treme crucltie , or do thinkc that righteous iudgement can be pro-
nounced,but while clemency the beft & fureft counfeller of kings,as
Salomon affirmeth , the preferuer of the kinges throne tsalTiftent,
which a certaine man in olde time truely faid to be the principal gift
©f Princes. Yet a magiftrate muft take hede to both,that he do nei-
ther with rigoroufncfle of minde wound rather than hea]e,or by fu-
perftitious affcftation of clemency fall into a moft cruell gcntlenet,
if with foft and loofe tenderncs he be dilTolute to the dcftrudion of
many me. For this was in old time not without caufc comonly fpokc
vndcr y empire of Nertja,that it is in dedc cuiU to liue vnder a princa
ynder whom nothing is lawful^but much worfe vnder whom al things .
are law full.
X I But fith fometime kinoes and peoples muft of neceflity take
fwerd in hande to execute fuch publike vengeance,by this reafon we
may alfo iudge that the warces are lawful which are fo taken in hand.
For if there be power deliuered them, whereby they may maintaine
iquiecto their dominion, whereby they oiay keepc downe the fedi-
tiou^
ToSaluarion. Lib.4, 616
tious ftirrcs of vnquicc men , whereby they may help the forceably
oppicfTedj whereby they may punifli cuill doingesrcan they at fitter
fcafon vtter it , than to fuppicfTc his rage which troubleth both pri-
uately the reft of cuery man,& the common quiet of all men,which
Icdiuoufiy makeih vprorcs , which committcth violent opprcllions
and haynouseuilldoinges? If they ought to be prcferuers and de-
fenders of rhc lawes^thcy muft alfoouerthrowe the cnccrprifcs of all
thembywhofe wicked doingc thcdifciplineof lawesis corrupted.
Yea if they worthily punifhe thofe thceues whole miuries hauc ex-
tended oncly to a fewrfhall they fuffcr a whole contree to be without
puniiliment vexed and wafted with robberies?For it maketh no dift'e-
icncc whether he be a king or one of the baftft of y comonalty,that
inuadeth an others contree into which he hath no right, & fpoikth it*
like an encniyrall arc alike to be taken and puniflied for robbcrs'This
therefore both naturall equine, and the rule of duetic teacheth that
P rinces are armed not onely to reftraine priuate duecies with iudici-
all puniflimemcs , but alio to defend with warre rhc dominions con*
wittcd to their charge, if at any time they be enuiclikc affailcd. And
fuch warres the holy Ghoft by many uftimonies of $<;ripturc decla* »
reth to be lawfull, ■ '• .«.• i t - J
II If it beobieded againft me, that in the new Teftamcnt is nei-
ther witnefle nor example which tcacheth that warre is a thing law-
fuil for Chriftians:firft I anfwere, that the fame rule of making warre
which was in old time remaincth alfoatthis day, & chat on the con-
trary fide there is no caufe that may debarre maj;iftrates from defen-
ding of their fubieds. Secondly that an expreflc declaration of thefc
matters is not to be fought jn the writinges of the Apoftles, where
their purpofe is not to frame a ciuilc ftatc,but to ftablilh the fpirituall
kingdomcof Chrift. Laftofall Ifay thatlnthcm alfoisfnewcdby
the way,that Chrift hath by hi scomming chaunged nothinge in this
behalfe . For if Chriftian dodrine ( that I may fpeake in Aiiguftincs Aug. c
owne words) condemned all warres, he would rather hauc faid this to pift 5
foldiars when they asked ccanfellof faluation, thatthey (houldc caft ^^ ^^^'
away their weapons, & vtterly withdraw themfelues from the warre, . ' • •
But it was faid to therftrike no 'man,d6 no man wrong,let your wages I«ke. 5.
fuffifG you. Whom he taught that their wages ought to fuffife them, '4»
he did verily not forbid them to be warriers.But al magiftraccs ought
here to take great hcdc,that they nothing at all folow their owne dc-
(ires:but rathcr,if they muft punifti,Iet them not be borne away with
a headlong angrincfte, let thciiinot be violently caricd with hatred,
let {he not broile with ynappeafable ri gor,yea let them (as Auguftine
KKKR ij
*Cap.2 o. Of the outward mcanes
faith) pity common nature in him in whom they punifhc his priuate
faille. Or if they muft put on armourc againft the enemy, that is, the
armed robber,[ct them not lightly fcckeoccafionthcrcofjnor takcic
bcingc offred vnlelTc they be driucn to it by extreme neceflity.For if
we ought to pcrforme much more than that heathen man required,
'icero ^l^'ch would haue warrc to fecme a fcekingofpeaccurudy we ought
f due- firft to attempt all thinges ere wc ought to trie the matter by warrc.
«*• Finally in both kindcs Icttc them not fuffer themfclues to be caried
v/ith any pnuatc 3S'e<5tion,but be led only with common fecling.O-
^ th^rwife they do very ill abufc their power.which i$ giuen chem,noc
for their own commodity,buc for others benefit & miniftery. Morc-
ouer oi the fame rightful! rule of makingc warre hangcih the order
both of garrifonsjand leagues, & other ciuile fortifications. Garrifons
I call thofe that are placed in towncs to defcnde the borders of the
contrce:Le3gues»which are made with Princes adioining for this co-
ucnanr that if any trouble happen in their landes they may mutually
help them,3nd ioync their forces in common together to fupprcflc
the common enemies oFmankinde : Ciuile fortiiication,whofe vfc it
in tbc art of warrc,
1 ^ This alfo t will laft of all adde, that tributes and taxes are the
lawfull rcuenues of princes,which they may chiefly employ to fuftain
the common charges of their ofFiCc: which yet they may like wife vfc
to their priuate royalty which is after a certaine maner coioined with
honor of chcptinccly ftate that they bcarc . As we fee that Dauid,
Eiccbias , lofias , Ipfaphat , and other holy kingcs , and lofeph alfo
and Danicll,according to the ftate of the perfon that they did bcarc,
were wiriiout oftenfe of godlmcs fumptuous of the common charge,
and wcread in Bzechiell that there was a very large portion ofland
'«.48. affigncd to the kingcs . Where although he paint out the fpirituali
^ * kingdome of Chnft , yet he fctchcth the cxamplar of his (imilitudc
from the lawfullkmgdomof men. But yet fo, thatPrirxccsagainc oa
ibcirb»;halucs (houlde remember, that their trcafure chambers are
not io much theirownc priuate cofers,as the rrcafuries of the whole
.oni.13 peopl!r,( fo I fo Paul c teftifieth) wnich they may not without mani-
fcfl wr og prodigally waft or fpoyie:oryrathcr that it is the very blood
ottI)c people, which not to (pare, is moftcrucUynnaturallneiTetand
let them thinke,that their i>iipofitioBs,and fub(idies,and other kindes
of trihuics, are nothing but the fupportcs of pubhke ncceffiry, whcr-
with.to wcry the poore communaltic without caufe , is tyrannicall
cv-orti^n . Thcfe things s do not encourage Princes to waftfuU cx-
pcnfc and riot , ( as verily there ii no ncedc to adde a £erbrandc to
ihcif
To Saliiation. Lib.4. ^37
their luftes that arc of chcfeiues too much already kindled ) but bth
it much bchoueth that they {houM with pure cofcicnce before God
be boldjto do al f they are bold to do,lcaft with wicked boldner they
come into defpiling of Gddjthey muft be taught how much is lawful
for them. Neither is this doftrine fupcrSuous for priuatc men , that
they (hould not raflily & ftubbornly giuc thcmfclucs leauc to tirudgc
at any cxpcnfes of PrinceSjalthough they exccedc common & ciuile
meafure.
14 Next to the magiftratetn ciuile ftates arclawes, themoft
ficonge finewcs of common weales , or ( as Cicero callcth them ac-
cording to Plato ) the foules, without which the Magiftrate can not
fiande, as they againe without the Magiftrate haue no liucly force.
Therefore nothinge could be more trucly faid,than that the law is a
dummc Magiftrate,and that the Magiftrate is a lining law.But where-
as I promifed to fpcake,with what lawes a Chriftian ciuil ftatc ought
to be ordered] there is no caufc why any ma (hould looke for a long
difcourfe of the beft kindc of lawes,which both (hould be infinite, &
pertained not to this prefent purpofe and placcryet in a few wordcs,
and as it were by the way,I will touchc what lawes it may vfe godlily
before God, and be rightly gouerncd by them amongc men. Which
fclfc thinge I had rather to haue vtterly pafled ouer with filence, if I
did not vnderftande that many do herein perilloufly errc. For there
be fomc that deny that a common weale is well ordered , which nc-
gleding the ciuile lawes of Mofes is goucrncd by the common lawes
of nations. Howe dangerous and iroublefomc this fentence iSjlet o-
ther menne con(ider,it fhall be enough for me to hauc flicwed thac
it is falfe and foolifhe . That common diuihon is to be kept , which
diuideth the whole lawe of God pubhfhed into roorall.ccrcmonialU
and iudiciall lawes : and all the partes arc to be feuerally con(idered,
that we may knowc what of them pertayneth to vs , and what not*
Neither in the meane time lettcany manne be combred with this
dout, thaciudicialls and cercmonialls alfopertayne to the morall
lawes . For ahhopgh the olde wry tcrs which haue taught this diui*
(ion , were not ignorant that thefe two later partes hadde their vfe a-
bout maners , yet bccaufe they might be changed and abrogate, the
moralls remainingefafcthey did not call them moralls. They called
that firft part peculiarly by that name, without which can not ftandc
the true holincflc of manners , and the vnchangeable rule of liuingc
rightly.
I $ Thcrforc the Morall law(chat T may firft bcginnc thercat)(itli
jaii cocained in two chicfc pointes.of which the one commaundcth
KKKK iij
Cap.2o, Of theounvard mcancs
(imply to worfliip God with pure faith and godlincfTe , & the other
to embrace men with vnfained louc, is the true and <stcrnall rMie of
rightcoufncs , prcfcribcd to the men of all ages & times that will be
Willing to frame their life to the will of God.For this is his eternal &
jal.4.4 vnchangeable will,that he himfelfe (hoiild be wor(hipped of as all,
& that we ftiould mutually Ipue one an other. The Ceremonial lav/
was the fchooling of the Iewes,whcrewith it plcafed the Lord to ex-
crcife the certaine childhoode of that people , till that time of fulnes
comejwhcrin he would to the ful manifcftly fhew his wifdom to the
earth , & dcliucr the trueth of thofe thmgs which then were (hado-
wed with figures. The iudiciall law giuen to them for an order of ci-
uile ftatcgaue certaine rules of equity & righteoufnes^by which they
might bchaue themfelues harmlefly & quietly together. And as that
exercise of ceremonies properly pertained in dedc to the dodrine of
godlincfl'e(namely which kept the Church of the lewes m the wor-
ship & religion of Qod) yet it might be diftjnguiflied from godlincs
it fclfe:fo this forme of iudiciall orders (although it tended to no o-
ther €ndc,but how the lelfe fame charity might bcft be kept which is
commaunded by the ctcrnall law of God) yet had a certaine thinge
differing from the very commaundement of louing, As therfore the
Ceremonies might be abrogate, gociline§ remaining fafe and vndc-
ftroied;fo thefe ludicial ordinances alfu being take away,the pcrpetu-
all dueties & commaundemcntes of charity may continue. If this be
true, venly there is liberty left to cue ry nation to make fuch lawcs as
they (hall forefee to be profitable for them:which yet muft be framed
after y perpetual rule of charity ,that they may in dcdc vary in forme,
buthaue thcfamereafon.Forl thinke tliai thofe barbarous & fauage
lawes,as were thofe that gaue honor to theues,that allowed common
copulations, & other both much more filthy & more againft rcafon,
arc not to be taken for lawesrforafmuch as they arc not only againft
all righteoufneSjbuc alfo againfi naturall gentilnes and kindeneiie of
men.
16 This which IhauefaydihalbepliynCjifinalllawcswe be-
hold ihtfe two things as we ought, the making and the equiiy of the
law , vpon the renfon wherof the making it fclfe is founded & ftaieth.
Equity jbecaufe it is naturall,can be but one of all lawcs'.and therefore
one law,accoi ding to the kindc of mattcr,ought to be the propoun-
ded cnde to all lavves. As for makings of Lawcs , becaufcihcy hauc
certaine circuftances vpon which they partly hang,if foy they tendc
al together to one marke of equity,though they be diuerfe it niakcth
no matter. Now fith it is certaine that the law of God which we call
moral!
To Saluation. Lib.4. ^28
Bioral IS nothing clfe but a teftimonic of the natutal law,and of that
confcicncc which is engraucnof God in the minces of iiienne,thc
whole rule of this equity whereof we now fpcake is fet forth therein.
Therefore it alone alfo muft be both the marke and rule and end of
all lawes.Whatfoeuer lawes fhalbc framed after that rulc,diredcd to
that markc,and limited in that cnde,thcrc is no caufc why we (hould
difallow them,howfoeuer they otherwife differ from the lewifhe law
or one from an other. The lawe of God forbiddeth to ftealc. What
peine was appointed for thefts in the ciuile ftatc of the lewcSjis to be ^^^ ^^
Tecnc in Exodus . The moft auncient lawcs of other nations puni- ,,
flied theft with recompence of double : the lawes that followed af-
terwarde , made difference betwene manifeft theft and no manifeft.
Some proceeded CO banifhment, fome to whipping^ » fomeatlafl
to the punifliment of death. Falfe witneflc was amoag the lewes pu- Dea.i^
nifhed with recompence of cgall paine , in Come places onely with * ^«
great fliamc , in (bmc places with hangingc , in other foinc with the
Croffe.Manflaughicr al lawcs vniuerfally do reuenge with blood,yet
with diuerfc kindes of death. Againft adulterers in fome places were
ordained fcucrcr paines , in fome places lighter. Yet we i*ce how with
fuch diuerfity all tende to the fame ende.For with one mouch they al
together pronounce puniHiment againft all the offences which haue
bin condemned by the cternall law of God, as manflaughters^thefts,
adulterie, falfc witnelUnges : but in the maner of punifhement they
agree nor. Neither is the fame needefuU, nor yet expedient. There
is fome contrec , which vnleffc it fticw rigor with horrible examples
againft manfleyers, (houU immediatly be deilroyed w; murders 6^:
robberies.Therc is fome time that requireth the fliarpnclfe of paines
to be encreafed. If there arife any trouble in a common wealc,the e-
oills that arc wont to growe thereof muft be amended with ncwc or-
dinances . In time of warre all humanitie wouldc in the noy fe of ar-
mure fall away , vnleffe there were caft into men an vnwonccd fcarc
of puniflicmentes.In barenneffe,in peftilence,vnleffe greater fcueri-
tie be vfed, all chingcs will come to ruine. Some nation is more bene
to fome certaine vice, vnleffe it be moft (harply fuppreffed. How ma-
licious and enuious (hall he be againft the publike profile, that fhal-
be offended with fuch diuerfitie which is moft Htte to holdc faft the
obferuinge of the lawe of God ? For, that which fome fay , that the
Lawe of God giucnby Mofcs is diflionored, whenitbeingc abro-
gate , newe arc preferred aboue it , is moft vaine. For neither arc o-
ther preferred aboue it , when they are more allowed , not in fimple
compariron,bucinrefpe^ofcbceftaeeofthetimes,place,andn3Uon.*
KKKK iiij
Cap.2o. Of the outward meancs
neither is chat abrogate which was neuer made for vs. For the Lord
gauc not that law by the handc of Mofes, which Ihould be publiflied
into al nation$,and florifh eucry where:but when he had recciucd the
nation of the Icwci into his faith, defence,& protedion,he willed to
be a lawemakcr peculiarly to them , and like a wife lawcmaker , he
hadde in makinge of his lawcs a certaine fingular confideration of
them.
17 Now remaincth that wc conGder that which we hauc fct in the
laft place,what profit of Jawes,iudiciall orders, and magiftrates, com-
meth to the common fclowfhippe of Chriftians. Wherewith alfo is
coupled an oth^r queftion , howc much priuatc men ought to yeeldc^
to magiftrates , and howc farre their obedience ought to proccedc.
Many thought the office of magiftrate to be fuperfluous amog Chri-
ftianSjbecauG; forfooth they can not godlily crauc their aide,namely
fith they arc forbidden to rcuenge , tofue in the law , & to haue any
to.13.4 controueifi<f. But whereas Paulecontrariwife plainly tcftificth , that
he is the minjfter of God to vs for goodiwc thereby vndcrftand, that
he IS Co ordained of God, that we beingc defended by his hande and
fuccours agaJAift the maliciouHies & iniuries of mifchieuous me , may
liuc a quiet and affured hfe . If he be in vaine giuen vs of the lord for
defsncCjVnlcflTc it be lawfull for v$ to vfc fuch benefitc : it fufficiently
appcarcth that he may alfo without vngodlineiTc be called vppon and
fued vnro. But here I muft hauc to do with two kindes of mennc.For
there be many men that boyle with To great ra<^e of q^arelling at the
lawe , that rhe v neuer haue quiet with themfelues vnlcfle they hauc
ftrife v/itho " r . And their concroucrlies they exercife with deadly
fharpneCTe oi hatred, and with mad greedines to reuenge and hurt,&
do purfuc them with vnappeafable ftitfcncfic euen to the very dc-
ftrudion of their aJuerfaric.In the meane timcthar they may not be
thought to do any thing but rightfuliy,they defend fuch peruerfenes
with colour ot'law.Butchough it be graunicd thee to go to law with
thy brothcr,yct thou maift not byandby hate him , not be carried a-
gainft htm with furious dcfitc to hurt him , not fiubbornly to purfuc
him.
18 Let this therefore be faid to fuch men, that the vfe of lawes i$
lawfultjifa man do rightly vfe ir. And that the right vfe both for the
pleintife to fue, and for the defendant to dcfendc , is if the defendant
bcinge fummoneddo appeare ac an appointed day^ and doth with
fuch exception as he can , dcfende his caufe without bitternelTe , but
oncly with this affedion to defend chat which is his owne by law : &
if the picintifc being vnworthily oppreffed cither in his pcrfon or his
goodcs.
To Saluation. Lib.4. 61^
goodcs ) do refort to the defence of the Magiftratc , make his com-
[^Jjaintc , and require that which is cquitic and confcicncc , but farre
From all gredy will to hurte or reuenge , farre from (harpncfie and
hatred, fartc from burning hcate of contention , but rather rcdy to
ycld of hisovvneandto fuftcr any thing, than tobccaried with an
cncmilike minde againft his aducrfaric.Cotrariwifc when being filled
with malice of minde , corrupted with enuic, kindled with wrath,
breathing out reuenge, or finally fo cnflamed with the heatc of the
conccntion , they gcuc ouer any parte of chantic , the whol;: procc-
ding euen of a moft iuft caufe can not but be wicked. For this ought
to be a determined principle to all Chriftians , that a conrroucrfic
though it be neuer fo righteous,can neuer be righdy purfued of any
man,vnlefl"c he beare as good will and loue to his aduerfaric,as if the
matter whicii isincontroucrfiewere already concluded and ended
hy compoficion.Some man will here pcraduenturc fay,that fuch mo-
deration is (o ncucr vfed in going to lawe^that it {hould be like a mi-
racle if any fuch were founde. I grauncin deede,as the maners of
thcfe times be, that there is fcldome fcne an example of a good con-
tender in lawe,yet the thing it felfe being defied with addition of no
cuclljceafl'eth not to be good and pure. But when we heare chat the
help of y Magiftrat is a holy gift of God : we muft fo much the more
diligently take hedcjthat it be not defiled by our faultc.
ip As for them that precilcly condemne al contendings at lawjlct
them vndcrftande that they do therwithall dcfpife the holy ordinace
of God , and a giftc of that kindc of gifccs v/hich may be cleanc to
the cleane : vnlcfle peraduenture they will accufe Paulc of wicked A^-a
doing, which did both put away from himfeife the fclanders of his ''^-^
accufers with declaring alfo their deceite and malicioufneire , and in ^ . ^^
iudgemet claimed for himfeife the prerogatiue of the citie of Rome,
and when neede washcappelled from an vnrighteous goucrnorto
the Emperors iudgemet fcate.Neither withftandethit, that all Chri- ^^u"^l
ftians are forbidden todclire reuenec , which we alfo do driuc farre If''^
away from Chriftian iudgemet fcatcs.For,if the contention be about
a common cafe,he gocth not the right way that doth not with inno> Deu.
cent fimplicitie , commit his caufc to the iudge as to a common de- 3 5 .
fender,thinking nothing leflc than to render mutuall recompence of ^"°'»
euill , which is the afFedion of reuenge : or if any matter of life and '^*
deathjor any grcate criminall adion be coramenced»we require that
the accufer be fuch a one , as commeth into the court being taken
iwith no boiling heate of rcuengc,and couched with no difpleafure of
pnuace iniurie , but onely hauiog in miode to wichftande che enter-
Cap.2o. Of the outwardc mcancs
prifcs of a mifcheuous mannc ,thac chey may not hurt che common
wealc.Buc if thou take away a rcucnging minde , there is no offence
done againft that commaundcment whereby reuenge is foibiddcn
to Chriftians.Buc chey arc not onely forbidden to delire reuenge, but
chey are alfo commaunded to wait for the hande of the Lorde,which
promifeth that he will be aprefent reuenger for che opprelTed and
aflifted : but they dopreuentall reuenge of the hcaucnly defendor,
which require helpe at the Magidrats hande either for themfeiues
or other. Not fo. For we muft thinke that the Magiftrats reuenge is
anuij not the reuenge of man but of God , which (as Paulc faith) he ex-
tendech and exercifech by the minifterie of man for our good.
20 And no more do we difagree with the wordes of Chrift , by
o which he forbiddeth to relift euell , and commaundech to turne the
righte cheke to him that hath gcuen a blowe on the lefc,and to fuffer
him to take away thy cloke that takcth away thy coatc. He willcth in
deede there chac che mindes of his (hould fo much abhorre from
defirc of recompenfing like for like , chat they fhould foner fuifer
double iniurie to be done to chemfclues , than dcHre to reacquire ic:
from which patience neither do we alfoleade chem away.For Chri-
flians truely ought to be a kinde of men made to bcarc reproches and
iniuries, open co the malice,deceites,and mockages of noughty men:
and not that onely ,buc alfo they muft be bearers of all thefe euilles,
that is to fay fo framed with all their harces,thac hauing receiued one
difpleafurc chey make chemfclues redyforan other , promifing to
themfeiues nothing in their whole life but the bearing of a continual
CrolTe. In the meane time alfo chey muft do good to chem that do
them wrong , and wiftic well to thofe that curfe them, and (which is
their onely vidorie ) ftriue co ouercome euill with good. Being fo
° ** minded chey will not fcke eye for eye , tooth for tooth, as the Pha-
!acc.5. rifes taught rhcir difciples to defire reuenge, but(as we are taught of
9' Cbnft)thcy will fo fuffer their body to be mangled,and their goodes
to be mahcioufly taken from them,that chey will forgeuc and of their
owne accorde pardon thofe eucls fo fonc as they are done to them.
Yet this euenneffe and moderation of mindes {hall not with ftandc,
but that the frendlTiip toward their ennemies remaining fafe , they
may vfe the hcipe of the magiftrat to the prcferuing of their goodes,
or for zele of pubhke commoditie may fue a giltie and pcftilenc man
to be punidied, whom they knowe that he can not be amended but
pift.j, by death. For Auguftine truely cxpoundeth that all thefe commaun^
iMar. dements tcnde to this ende ,chat a righteous and godly man ftiould
^^^ be ready to bearc patiently, the malice of them whom he feckcth to
hau6
ToSaluation. Lib.4. ^30
haue made good men , that rather the number of" the good may cn-
creafe, i^ot that he fhould with jike malice adde himfclfe alfo to the
numbre of the euell; then, that they more perteinc to the prepara-
tion of the hartjwhich is mwardely,than to the worke which is done
openly ; that in (ccret may be kept patience of mmde with good
Will, but openly that may be done which wc (ec may be profitable to
them to whom we ought to bearcgood will.
1 1 But this which is wonte to be obieded » that contendings in
laweare altogether condemned of Paule,isairo falfe. It may ca- i Cor.
illy bepercciucd by his woides, that there w^is an immeafurable ^'^ .
rage of ftr^uingat lawe in the Church of the Cormthians : fo farrc
forth that they did make the Golpell of Chrill and the whole reli-
gion which they profefled.open to the cauillations and euell fpeaking
of the vvicked.This is the fiiil thing that Paule blameth in them,thac
by their intempcraunce of contentions t^ey brought the Gofpell in
fclander among the vnbcleuers. And then this point alfo^thac in fucb
fort they ftiiued amog thcrafelues brethren with brcthren.For they
were fo farf e from bearing of wrongcs , that they grcdily gaped one
for an others goodcs^rouoked one an other,anil being vnprouoked
ilidhurte. Therefore heinueyeth againft that rage of contending,
andnotfimplyagainftallcontrouer^es. But he pronounceth that ic
is a fault or a wcakcneflcjthat they did not rather fuffer loflc of their
goodes than to trauaile euen to contentions for the prcferuing of
them : namely when they were focafily mouedvvith euery damage,
and for moft fmall caufes did runne to the court of Jawe and to con-
irouerfies , he faith that this is a profe that they were of a minde to
ready to anger and not well framed to patience. Chriftians verily
ought to do this , that they had alway rather to yelde of their ownc
right than to go to lawe, from whes ihey can fcarcely get out againe
but with a mmde to much moued and kindled to hatred of their
brother. But when a man fceth that without loflc of charitie he may
defend his ownc, the lolTc whereof fliould be a fore hindrance vnto
him : if he do Co he offendeth nothing againft this faying of Paule.
Finally (as wc hauc taught in the beginning)charity {hall gcue euery
man belt coun(ell,without which whatfoeuer controuerfics are taken
in hande,3nd bcyonde which whatfoeiier do precede, wc holde it cut
pf controLicrfie that they be vniuft and wicked.
Z2 The fjrft dutie of fubieflcs toward their magiftratcs is, to
thinke moft honorably of their office , namely which they acknow-
ledge to be a iurifdiflion comitted of God, and therefore to eftecme
them and rcucrencc them as the minifters and deputies of God,
Cap.2o. Of the outward mcancs
For a man may findc fomc , which yeldc themfelues very obedient
to their magiftrats , and would not that there were not (ome whom
they fhould obey , bccaufe they fo knoweit to be expedient for the
common benefit: but of the magiftrats themfelues they thinkcno
otherwife than of ccrtainc neceflaric cuills . But Peter requireth
^*'** fomewhat more of v$, when he commaundeth that the king be ho-
rouer. "o^^cd : and Salomon , when he commaundeth God and the king to,
4.ai. be fcared.For Peter vnder the word of Honoring cotcineth a fincere
:om. and well deming eftimation:& Salomon ioining the king with God,
i' 5- iheweth that he is full of a ccrtaine holy reuerencc and dignitic. Thi$
is alfo a notable commendation in Paulc,that we obey not oncly foe
wrath but for confcicnce.Whercby he meaneth that fubieftes ought
to be leddc not onely with fcare of princes and rulers to be holdcn
in their fubiedion ( as they are wont toyeldtothcir armed enemie,
which fee that vcngeace (hall rcdily be taken vpon them if they refill)
but becaulc the obediences that are fhewcd to them arc (hewed to
God himfelfc ,forafmuch as their power is of God. I fpeake not of
the men,as if the vifor of dignitie did coucr foolifliencfiejOr fluggifli-
neflcjor cruclties,or wicked maners and full of mifchcuous doing:but
I fay that the degree it CcKc is worthy of honor and rcuercnce : that
whofocuer be rulers may be eftecmcd with v$,and hauc reuerencc,
in rcfpcd of their being rulers.
2 J Of this then alfo followcth an other thing:that with mindes
bent to the honoring of thcjthey declare their obedience in profe to
them : whether it be to obey their proclamations,or to paye tribute,
or to take in handc publike offices and charges that ferue for comon
defence » or to do any other of their commaundements. Lcteuery
om. foule (faith Paule) be fubied to the hier powers. For he that refifteth
J.I' thcjpowcr, refifteth the ordinance of God. The fame Paule writeth
p*3'" to Titus: VVarne them that they be fubieft to rulers and powers.
' ' that they obey the MagiftratSjthat they be redy to cucry good worke.
And Peter faith , Be ye fubied to eucry humaine creature (or rathcc
as I tranflate itjOrdinance) for the Lordcs fake, either to the king a$
moft excellent, or to the rulers that are fent by him , to the punifhc-
met in deede of cucll doers,butto the praife of well docrs.Moreoucf
that they (hould tcftific that they do not faine fubieftion, but arc fin*
,Tim. ccrcly and hartily fubied, Paule addeth that they fliould commends
M» to God the fjfeticand profpcritieofthem vndcrwhomiheyliue,
Icxhorte (faith he) that there be made prayerSjbcfechinges, inter-
cefliionSjthankefgeuinges for all men, for kings and for all that be fet
infupcriorit/jthat wc may lii}c a peafabl^ and c^uiet life wi(h al Qod\i4
To Saliiation. Lib.4. ^31
neflc and honcftic.Neither let any man here decciuc himfelfc. For
lith the magiftrat can not be rcfiitcd.but that God himfelfc muft
alfo be rcfilted : although it may be thought that an vnarmed ma-
giftrat may frcly be defpifcd , yet God is armed which will ftrongly
take vengeance on the defpiung of himfclfe. Moreoucr vndcr thi$
obedience I contcyne moderation, which priuate men ought to
>^ bindc thcmfelucs tokcpein cafes touching the publike ftatc,thaC
they do not of their owne head cntcrmedle in pubhkc bufinelfes, or
ralhely breakc into the office of the Magiftrat, and enterprifc no-
thing publikely.If any thing ihall in a publike ordmace be bchouefull
to be ameded,let not themfclues raife vprores, nor put their handes
to the doing of it , which they all ought to haue faft bounde in this
behalfe: but let them commit it to the iudgcment of the magiftrat,
whofe hand alone is herein at libcrtie.I mcane, that they prefume to
do nothing vncommaunded. For when the commaundcmcnt of the
ruler is adioincd,then are they alfofurniftied with publike authority.
For as they are wont to call the counfellers of a king , his earcs and
eyes : fo not vnfiiiJy a man may call them the handes of the prince,
whom by his commaundcmcnt he fettcth in authoricie for the doing
of things.
24 Nowc forafmuch as we haue hetherto defcribed a magiftrac
fuch as is in deede the fame that he is called , namely the father of
the contree,and (as the Pocte calleth him)the paftor of the people,
the keeper of peace.the protedor of righieoufncflTc, the reuenger of
innocence : he is worthily to be iudged a maddc man, that alloweth
not fuch a gouernement. But whereas this is in a mancrthcexpc-
riece of all ages,that of princes fome being careleffe of all things to
the forefcing whereof they ought to haue bene hedefully bent, do
without all care flouthfully wallowe in dclites : other fomeaddided
to their gaine,do fet out to fale all lawes,priuileges,iudgements, and
grauntes'.other fomc fpoile the pore communaltie of money which
they may after watte vpon madprodigall expendings: other fome
cxercife mere robberies, in pilling of houfcs, dcfilmg of virgins and
matrones , murthering of innocentes : many can not be perfuaded
that fuch fliouldbe acknowledged for princes, whoes authoritic
they ought to obey fo farrc as thniocnay. For in fo great hainous
vnworthincffc , among doings fo much contraric to the duetic not
oncly of a magiftrate,but alfo of a man,they beholde no forme of the
image of God which ought to (hinc in a Magiftrat: when they fee
no token of that minifter of Gocl,which was gcuen for praifc to the
good and for vcngeacc to the cucll : fo neither do they alTo acknow*
Cap,2o. Of the outwardc mcanes
ledge fuch a Gouernor,whocs dignicic and authoritic ih« Scriptifri?
commendech vnto vs. And trucly this fclwig of affcdiion hath alway
bene naturally planted in the mindcsof menjnoleffe to hate and
abhorrc tyrantcs,than to loue and honor lawful! kings.
a J But if we loke to the word of God , it will leade vs further,
that webcfubicd: notonely to the gouernementof rhofe princes
which cxcc'itc their office toward vs well and with fuch faithfulncflc
as they ought , but alfo of al! them , which by what meane foeuer it
bcjhauc the dominion in poffellio although they performe nothing
leffc than that which pcrteineth to the duetie of princes.For thougli
the Lordc tcftificth that the magiftrat is a fpcciall great gift of his li-
beralitie for prcferuingof the fafetic of men, and appointcth to ma-
giftrats thcmfclues their boundcs : yet he doth thercwiEhall declare,
that ot what fort foeuer they be , they hauc not their authoritic but
from him : that thofe m deede, which rule for bencfite of the comon
weale , arc true examplars and paternes of his boimtifuJneffe : that
they that rule vniuftly & willfully , are raifcd vp by him topuniih the
wickedneffe of the people : that all egally hauc that maieftie where-
with he hath furniflieda lawfull power. I will procede no furthcr,tilt
0K34. 1 baue added fome certaine teftimonies of that point. Yet we ncede
o. not much to labor to proue that a wicked King is the wrarh of God
>fc.i ?. vpon the earth, for afmuch as I thinke that no man will fay the con-
la. 3,4. ^*^3ry,and otherwife there (hould be no more fayed of a King than of
:.io.5. a common robber that violently takcth away thy goods , and of an
•c i8, adulterer that defilcth thy bed, of a murthercr that feketh to kill
?• thee, whereas the Scripture reckcneth all fuch calamities among the
curfes of God. But let vs rather tary vpon prouing that , which doth
not fo eafily fettle in the mindes of me : that in a moft nougbty man,
and moft vnworthy of all honor,if fo that he haue the publike power
in poffefTion , remaineth that noble and diuine power which the
Lorde hath by bis word geuen to the minifters of his righteoufneflc
and ludgement: and therefore that he ought of his fubic^tstobe
hadm as great rcuerence and eOimation , ib much as perteineth to
publikc obedicnce,as they would haue the bcft King if he were geucn
them.
z6 F)rft T would hauc t^^j^^eders to perceiue and diligently
marke that prouidence and fin!?«tar doings of God , which is in the
Scripture not without caufefooft rehcarfedvntovs,in diftributmg
an. I. of kJngdomes and making Kings whom it pleafeth him.In Daniel, ic
[, is faid : The Lorde changeth times and courfes of times , he cafteth
away and inaketh Kings. Againc : That the huing may knowc tbac
the
To Saluation. Lib.4. ^32
the Hicft is mighty in the kingdomc of men , and he (hall gcuc it to
whom he will. With which mancr of fcntcnccs whereas the whole
Scripture aboundeth , yet that fame prophecy of Daniel fpccially
fwarmeth full. Nowe what mancr of king was Nabuchadonczar, he
thai coquered Hierufalcmjit is fufficiently knowen, namely a ftrong
inuader and dcftroyer of other. Yet m Ezechicl the Lorde affirmcth ^*^»*J
that he gauc him the lande of Egypt for the feruice that he had done **
to him in wafting it. And Daniel faid to him:Thou king arte the king Oan. %
of kings,to whom the king of heauens hath geuen a mighty,& ftrog, J7«
and glorious kmgdome : to thee, I ray9 he hath geuen it > and all the
landes where dwell the children of men,thc beafts of the wood, and
fowles oFthe aire:he hath deliuered them into thy hande, and hath
made thee tobearc rule ouer them. Againc he fayed to his fonne
Belfafar : The hieft God hath giuen to Nabuchadonexarthy Father Dj_ -
kingdome and royaltic,honor and glory:& by reafon of the royaltie ij.
that he gaue him,all peoples, trib;rs,& languages were trembling and
fearfull at his fight. When wc heare that a king is ordcined of God,
let vs thcrof call to remembrance thofe hcauenly warnings coccrning
the honoring and fearing of a king:then we fhall not douc to accopt
a moft wicked tyratin the fame place whcrin the Lord hath vouch*
faued to fette him. Samuell , when he gaue warning to the people of <.$am.
Ifraelltwhat maner of things they (hould fufFer at the hands of their '« * *•
kinges,faid : This fhalbe the right of the king that fhall reigne oucr
you : he fhall take your fonncs and put them to bis chariot , to make
them his horfmen,and to plowe his land,and rcapc his croppc,and to
make inftrumcnts of warre. He Ihall take your daughters t that they
may be his drcffers of ointmentes,his cookes and bakers. Your lands,
your vineyardes , and your beft Oliue plantes he fhall take away and
gcue to his bonde feruantes. He (hall take tithes of your feedes and
vincyardes,and fhall gcue them to his cunuchcs and bonde feruantes.
He fhall take away your bonde mcn,your bonde wome & your alTcs,
and fet them to his workc.Yea and he fhall take tithes of your flockcs:
and ye fhalbe his bonde feruantes. Verily kings fhould not haue done
this of right,whom the Lawe did very well inftrud to all continence:
but it was called a right ouer the people which it behouedthemof
neceffitie to obey,and they might nor refift it : as if Samuell had faid.
The wiltulnefTe of kings fhall runne to luch hccncioufnefTe , which
it fhall not be your part to rcfjft, to whom this onely thing fhalbe left,
to obey their commaundcments and barken to their word.
27 But chiefely there is in Icrcmie a notable place and worthy to
be rcmebrcd,whtch although it be fomwhat loDg>yei I will be cotenc
Cap.2o. Of the outwardemcancs
to rchcarfe,bccanfc it moil plainly deiermineth this whole qucftion,
er »7» ^ 1^3"c made the earth and menjCiith the Lordejand the liuing crea-
;, turcs that mc on the ouerface of the earth in my great ftrength and
ftrctched out armc , and I will deliucr it to him whom it pleafcth
in mine eyes. And nowc therefore I haue gcuen all thefe iandcs into
the handeof Nabuchadnczar my feruance,and ail nations and greac
icings fhnll fcruc him , till the time (liall come of that bndc. And it
fhalbc as a nation and a kingdome that hath not ferued the king of
Babell,! will vific that nation in rwerde,faminCj& peftilcncc. Whcr-
fore , fcrue yc the kmg of BabcU andliuc. Wc fe with Howe great
obedience the Lordc willed chat cruell and proude tyrant to be ho-
nored, for no other rcafon but bccaufe he poflcflcd the kingdome.
And thcPtme was by the heaucnly decree » that he was fct in the
throne of the kingdome,and taken vp into kingly maicftic, which ic
was vnlawfui to violate.If wc haue this cotinually before our mindes
' and eyeSjthat euen y worft kmgs arc ordcincd by the fame decree by
which theauchoricie of kings is ftablyfhcdcthefe fcditious thoughtes
fhali neuer come into our minde , that a king is to be handled accor-
ding to his' deferuings , and that it is not mete that we fliould fhewc
our fclucs lubiedes to hun that doth not on bis behalfc fliewc him-
ffclfc a king to vs.
28 In vaine Ihall any man obied that this was a peculiar com-
niaundcmcnt to the Ifraelites. For it is to be noted with what rca^
fon the Lorde confirmcth it.I haue gcuen (fayeth he) the kingdome
to Nabuchadnciar. Wherefore fcrue ychim and hue. To whom
foeucr therefore it /halbe certaine that the kingdome isgeuen.let v»
not dooc that he is to be obeyed. And fo Tone as the Lorde aduan-
ccth any man to the royall cftatc , he therein declareth his will to vs
that he will haue him reignc.For thereof are gcncrall tcftimonies of
the Scripture.Salomon m the xxviit. Chapter, Many Princes are bc-
caufe of the wickcdiiefl'c of the people. Againe lob in the xij. chap»
■ He takcth away fubieif^ion from kings,and girdeth them againe with
rg -. 0 fl^c girdle.But this being confcfledjihere remaineth nothing but that
wc muft fcrue and liuc. There is alio in f crcnrjie ti:e Prophet an other
commaundcment of the Lorde , wherein he commaondcth his
people to feke the peace of Babilo, whither they had bene led away
captiue , and to prny to him for it , becaufe in the peace of it fhouid
be their peace.Behold the Ifraelites being fpoiledof all their goods,
plucked out of their houfes, led away into exile , and caft into mife-
rablc bondc?ge,are commaunded to pray for the fafctie of the Con-
queror : not as m other places wc are commaunded to pray for our
perfc-
To Saluation^ Lib.4. <^33
perfffcuters : buc that the kingdomc mny be prcfcrued tohiinielfc
and quict,thac they thcmfclues may alfo hue profpcroufly vnder him.
So Dauid being already appointed king by the ordinance of God,
and annointcd with his holy oile , when he was without any his de-
fcrumg vnwortiiily pertccuted of Saul , yet the hed oihim chat layed
waire for his life , he eftemed holy , which the Lorde had hallowed v
with the honor of kinodome. F.lrre be it from me (faid he) that I "f'^*™*
fiioiild before the Lorde do this thing to my Lorde the annointed ^ '*
of the Lorde,that I ibouid lay my hande vpon himjbecanfc he is the
annointcd of the Lorde. Againc, My foule hath fpared thee , and I ••^^"™«
hauc faid , I will not lay my hande vpon my Lorde , bccaufe he is the
annointed of the Lofdc. Againe , Who (hall lay his hande vpon the
annointcd of the Lorde,and flialbe-innocent r So furc as the Lorde
lioeth , vnlcfic the Lorde ftrikc him , or his day be come that he dy,
or he go down into battell : farrc be it from me that I fhould lay my
hande ypon the annointcd of the Lorde.
29 Fir^ally weowcthjs affedion of reucrenceyeaand dcuotioti
to all our rulers , of what fort foeuer they be, Which I do therefore
the Of tcner rcpecc, that we may Icarne not to fearchc what the men
thcmfclues be, buttake tliis tor fufficiente jthat by the will of the
Lorde they bearc that perfon age » in which the Lorde himfclfc hath
cmpnnted and cngraucd an inoiolable maieftie. But (thou wilt fay)
Rulers o.we mucuall'dutiesto their fubiedes. Thatl hauc already
cofcfled.'But if thou therupon concludcy obediences are to be ren-
dred to none bur to iufte '^^ou^rnscmenrSjthou arta foolifh reafoner.
F/jr^husbandcsahbarc boundeto their wiues and parcntes to their
chiidiien.Avich mutuall duties. Letparentcs and husbandes depart ^p'^-^'
from their dutie: let parcntes lliewc themfelucs fo hard and vn-^ ^'^'
plcafablc to their children, whom they arc forbidden to prouokc to
anger, that with their pcuinmelTe they do vnmcafurably wery them:
Ut the husband es moft dcfpitcfully vfc their wiues , whom they arc
commaunded toloiie,andto fpare them aswc^k? veflels: {hall yet i.fet.
therefore either children be leflc obedicr to their parentes or wiues 3 7'
to theit husbandcs? But they arc fubicd bothioeuill parcntes and
husbandes and fuchasdonot their dutic. Yea, whereas alloughc
rather to cndeuor thcmfclues not to looke bchindc the to the baggc
banging at their backc,ihat is,not to enquire one of an others duties,
but cucry man f. t before him that which is his owne dutie:this ought
chicfely to hauc place amonge thofey are vnder the power of other.
Wbcrforc if we be vnmercifully tormeted of a cruel Prince, if we be
rauenouily fpoiled of a couecous ovriotous Prince, if wc be negle^(5d i^
LLLL
Cap.2o. Of the outwarde meanes
Dan, $, of a flouthfull Prince , finally if we be vexed for godlineflcs fake of ai
7« wicked and vngodly Prince : let vs iirft call to minde the rcmembracc
of our fiiincs , which vndoutedly are chaftifed with fuch fcourges of
/ the Lorde. Thereby humihtie fhali bridle our impatience. Letvs
then ^Ifo call to minde this thought, that it perteineth not to vsta
^ remedy fuch eueU : but this onely is left for v$ , that vre crauc the
hclpe of the Lorde jin whocs hand arc the hartcs of kings , and the
Pro.21. bowings of kingdomcs. He is the God that fhall ftande in the aficnt-
X. bite of gods , and fhall in the middeft iudge the Gods from whoes
Pral.8j. face all kings fhaU fall, and be broken , and all the iudgcs of the earth
p^^j that fiiall haue not kilTed his annointed,that haue writte vniufi lawes
1 o. '^ oppreife the poore in iudgement,and do violence to the caofe of
BHi.io. the humblcjto make widowcs a pray,and robbe the fatherle0e.
'• ;o And here both his maruelous goodnefIc,and power,and pro-
uidence (heweth it felfe i for fomctimc of his feruantcs he raifeth vp
open reuengers, and furniflieth them with his commaundement, to
take vengeance of their vniuft gouernemeni,& todeliuer his people
many waycs opprcfTed out of mifcrablc diftrcfle : fometimc hedi'
re^eth to the fame ende the rage of men that entende and go about
an other thing , So he deliuered the people of Ifraell out of the ty-
Exo.j. ranny of Pharao,by Mofcs : and out of the violence of Chufam king
7- of Syria,by Othoniell : and out of other thraldomes, by other kings
lud. 3. Qj. lucJgcs.So he tamed the pride of Tyrus, by the Egyptians : the in-
"^ ^' folcnce of the Egyptians, by the Afiyrianstthe ferccneffe of the
AffyrianSyby the Chaldees:the boldncflc of Babilon,by the Medians,
and by the Perfians when Cyrus hadde fubduedthcMediaiis. And
the vnthankfulnefTeof the kmgsofluda and lfraell,and their wicked
obftinatie toward his fo many bcncfites,he did bcatc downeand
bring to diftreflc fometime by the Affyrians, fometime by the Ba-
biionians , albeit not all after one maner. For , the firft fort of men
wncn they were by the lawfqll calling of God fcnt to do fuch a<ftes:
in taking armure againft kinges , they did not violate thatmaieftie
which is planted in kings by the ordinance of God : but being ar-
^ med from heaue they fubducd the lefTer power with the greater rlikc
asitislawfullforkingstopunirti their Lordcs vnder them.But thefe
later fort, although they were direded by the hand of God whether
it pkafed him , and th«y vnwittingly did his worke , yet purpofed in
their mjnde nothing but mifchefe.
51 But howfoeuer the very doings of men be iudgcd, yet the
Lorde did as well execute hii worke by them,when he d|d breake the
bloody fceptcrs of proude kings, and ouecthrewe their intolerable
gouerne-
ToSalitatiori, ^ ^ Lib.4. ^34
goucrnementcs. Let Princes hcitikiii^'hc afraide. But we in the
mcane time muft take ^reate hede, that we do not dcfpife or offcndc
that .luthoritic of IVl^gi^rates .full ,of reiicrcnd mnicftie, which God
hath ftablilhcd with moft weighty decrees,, although it rcmaine with
^oft Unworthy men, ^ti'd whichdo with their wickedncflTc , fo much
as in them is,dcfile it.For thoui^h the correfting of vnbridlcd gouern-
fncrtt be the rcuehgemtnte of the Lordc,lct vs not by and by thinkc
that it is committed t'o'Vs, to whom there is gcucnno other com-
maundcment but to obey and futfcr. I fpeakcalway of priuncmen.
For if there be at thistirne any Magiftrates for the behalfe of the
people , (fuch as in olde time were the Ephori, that were fct againft
the kings of Lacedemoniajor the Tribunes of the pcople,againft the
Romane Confuls : or the Dcmarchy , againft the Senate of Aihenes:
and the fame power alfo which paraduenturc , as thin^.s sre nowe,
the three eftatcs haue in euery realmc , when they holde their prin-
cipal! aflfcmblies) I dofotiot fcrbiddc them according to their office Pj'la-
towithi^ande the outraging lice ntioufnefle of kings, that I affirme n'^'^^s*
that if they winke at kings willfully raging ouer and treading downe
the poorecommunaJtic, their diflemhiing is not without wicked
breacheof faith 5 becaufe they deceitfully bcnay the liberiie of the
pcoplcjwhcrcofthey knowe themfclues to be appointed protedtofs
by the ordinance of God. "^'" .'"■
''51 But in that obedience which wc haue determined to be due
to the authorities of Goucrnors jthisisalway to be excepted , yea
chicfely to be obferucdjthat it do nor lead vs away from obeying of
him ,to whocs will the delires of all kinges ought to be fubied , to
whocs decrees all their commaundcmenrs ought to ycldc, to whoes
maieftie their maces ought to be fuhmitted. And crucly howc vnor-
d:rly were it,for the fatisfying of men torunneinto his difplcafurc
for whom men themfelues are obeyed f" The Lorde therefore is the
kings of kings : whojwhen he hath opened his holymouth,istobc
heard alone for altogether and abouc all : nexte to him we be fubied
to thofe men that are fetouer vs : but no otherwife than in him. If
they commaunde any thing againft him, let it haue no place and let
no accompt be made of it : neither let vs herein any thing ftay vpon
all that dignitie wherewith the Magiftrates excell , to which there is
no worng done, when it is brought into order of fubiedion in com-
parifon of that (insular and trucly foueraigne power of God. After
this reafon Daniell denied that he had any thing offended againft Dan. tf.
the king, when he obeyed not his wicked proclamation : becaufe the **'
king had pafted his boundes , and had notonely bene a wrong doer
LLLL ij
Cap.2o. , ,0| the oiuwardc mcancs
to men , butinlifdngyp j;ij$,)iQrjr},(;siigainft Go^ he bad taken away;
power from himfelfe . On the other fide the K^aclitcs are condem-
ncdybecaufc they were to much obedient to the wicked commaun-
demcnt of the king. For vyncn Icrobeam had made golden calues,
ihcy foiTakinge the tcm|Jle of God , did for his plcafurc turnc tq
ricwe fupcrftitions.With like lightneffe their poftcrity inclined thcm-
feluesto the ordinances of iheir kings. Witlj this the Prophet Ihar-
ply reprochetii them , that they embraced the commaundements of
the king : fo farre is it of, that the pretenfe bf humilitic may deferuc
praifc.whercwith the flatteres of the court do couer thcmfelues and
deceiae the fimplc » while they fay that it is not lawfull for tbem to
refufe any thing that is commaunded them of their Princes : as
though God had refigncd his right to mortall men, geuing them the
rule of mankindc : or as though the earthly power were mmiflied,
when it is made fobied to the author of it, before whom euen the.
heauenly poyversdo humbly tremble for feare. Iknowc howc great
and howe prcfent peril! hangeth ouer this conftantie , bccaufe kings
domoft difpleafantly fuffer themfelues to bcdefpifedjwhoes difplea-
furc ( faith Salomon) is the meflenger of death. But fith this decree
is proclaimed by the heauenly harald PctenTnat we ought to obey
God rather than men , let vs comfort our felues with this thought,
that we then performe that obedience which the Lor derequiretb,
when we lijffcr any thing rather whatfoeuer it be , than fwarue from
Gofilincffc. And that our courages {hould not faint. Pauleputteth
alfo m other fpurre to v$:That we were thcrfore rcdemed of Chrift
wirh fo great a price as our redemption cod him , that we fliould not
yelde our felues intbraldome to obey the pcruerfe defircsof men,
but much lelfc (hould be bonde to vngodlineflc
Praile be to God. T. N.
A TABLE OF TH^ CHIEFE'MATc
ters contained in this bookc.
Dams fall
bo, 2, cap. I.
^Angels, bo,
J.ca.f4.
Anointing.
See Vndio.
^fcend'inge of Chriji into
heauen, bo.2,ca.i6.
B.
Baprijme, bo.2,ca.rS'
Baptijme cf infantes, bo.4.ca.
id.
c
{^fmnh. bo.4.ca.r. C opart fon
«/ the true &fa!fe C'hurch.
bo.4'Ca.», lurifdilhon'ib' di-
fcipline of the Church, bo, 4.
cap. ir.& n. Tower of the
Church M t ouc hinge makjnge
lavves.bo.4..ca,i o. 'Tower of
the Church m totichtnge arti-
cles of Faith. bo.4.(a.S. The
fkate of the old Church, bo,4.
fa. 4. Order and mimfteries of
the Church.bo.4. ca.j,
Chri ft. The godhead efChrifi.
bo.2.cap.i 4. How theperfon
*>f C^^^'^ ** °"' "^ two na-
tf'.res.bo.2.cap.i4.VVhereto
Chriftvvof fent.bo.t.c^p.rs
How C^'^'jt ''^'^ defertted
for vs eterna'i Itfe.bo.z.c^ry
How Chriji it the Mediator.
bo.2,ca, 13. Ihrifl the T^e-
demer, bo.s.ca.id. C^f'l^^
Prophet, f^ng and Trtefl.bo.
z.ca.r 6.Defcending of Chriji
to hdLbo.2.ca,r6.'l(eji(ryeiii6
and.ifcentionofChrtftf by.z.
ca.i6.
Chrifiian liberty, bo.j,ra.rp.
Chrifttanr/tam ltfe.bo,i.ca,6
Ciuile gouerranet .bo.4.ca,2o,
Ciuile iudgernets.bo.4.ca.io,
fonfej^ioii & fati^fMionpO'
pish. b(W^ca.4'
Confirmation popiihe, bo. 4.
ca./p,
^onfcience* . ho.^ca.rp.
Coitnc ells and thetr author i'
ty. bo.4,ca.g.
Creation of man. bo.r.carj.
CroJfe.Beartng of the Crojfe,
bo.i.cap.S,
Death ofChnji. bo.2.cap. r6.
Defcendmgof C hrtfi to Hell.
bo.2.ca,i6.
"Deuils. bo.i.ca.T4,
Di fcipline. See iwifdiciion.
E.
Ele[lion,The eternal Ele£f':on,
bo.s.ca.ir, TheeternallEle-
Hion of God u ftablished by
vocacion. bo.i.cap,i4.
EJfence of God one^ eJr per font
three. b0,i.ca.ij,
F.
Faith ho.3.ca.2.Seeiu(i'fica-
tton & power of the church,
Fajiing. bo.4.ca.t:.
The forfak^uge of our felues.
bo.s.ca.7.
Freevvill.bo,i ,ca.i s . & l-'0,2
cap, 2.^ J,
G.
God.See Image. I<^ovvledge
of God,
Godhead of Chriji. bo.2.c.i4
Gouer)H7ient cti*ile,bo,4,ca.2o
H.
Hands. See Laying en ofhads.
Heret:kes and Schifmaltkes.
bo.4.ca.i.
Holy Ghoji cb" hii ojfices-bo.f
ca.r»
Thefecrete workings of the
holy Ghoft.bo.f .ca.i.Simie U'
gainji the holy Ghoji, bo.j,
cap.s.
Idols, {ia.r.ca.i/.& ii.
iefiis.Name ofldjiis. bb.i^ca.
Image of God. bo.r.ca./f.Tv
fain r an lmagf\fGod li vn •
lavvfuU.bo.i.ca.'t.
Indulgences or 'Fardons.bo. j,
ca.s, f' )
Intf reef ion of'Sain^cs.bo.j,
ca.2 0 .
Ihdgentent ciiiile. bo,4.ca.20.
Inrifdtclion and di fcipline 'if
the ch-Arch.bo, A..r % .1 1 .(b" '-*
lujitfcatton of Faah. bo.j.
ca,ii. Eeginntnge audprocee'
ding oflujlifitation, bc.s.ca,
/4. In lujlificatton vvhat
thingesareto be noted, bopj,
ca.is»
K.
Knowledge of God. bo.f.ca,
Jj&c. That Godu kjovven
naturally ofaUmen.bo.i.ca.j
whereto the k^ievvledge of
Godtendeth. bo.i.ca.i.
That the k^>]ovvledgeofGi>d
ii choked either bythei^no^
ranee or malice of men,. 00, i-,
Ca,4'
L.
Lav.v.bo.2.ca.7. Lavves.bo.
4.ca.io. The lavv.the ende^
office andvfe thereof, bo.?,
ca,7, Expofition of the MO'
rail law. bo.3.ca,S, Lice po-
v^ir of the church.
Liberty C^rijtiau.bo.;,ca.is^
Lifi'Life of a Chnjiian man,
bo.j.ca.6. t/Vledttatton of the
life to come,bo,i,ca- r-.Hovve
prefent life is 10 be yfcd.bo.s,
ca.io.
Loueofournesgkbour, bo,if
ca.i.
L L L L iij
M.
^ajJe^Popish. bi.4.ca.rf.
tMatrimony. bo 4,ca.i^.
^Udiator Chrt(f. io.i.ca.ii,
Merites ofvvrkes.^o.}.ca,rs
Idtnijieries of the Church, bo,
Jiionkery. bo.4.ca./s,
Ji'ioraU luvv expoutidtd. bo.
s»ca.S»
N.
Neighbour. LoHivf Neigh-
bour, bo. 2. CO. S
o.
Ojfo'nce. bo.} .ca. / g.
Orders and minijieries of the
Church, ho 4.ca.i.
Orders Eccle/iafticall of the
pope. bo.4.capt/p,
Ongtt^JiJlnne. bo.i.ca.r.
0th. b'j i.cap.S
P.
'JPaJlorS.-their eleEtio ip" ojfice.
bo.4ia-f,
Penace.True Petace.h.j.ca.j
Popish Penance. bo4'Ca.t9,
Power oftho Church m tow
chwg articles ofFayth. bo. 4.
ea.S.
Touching mak^ifig of lavves,
bo.4-ca,:e,
Traier. bo.^.ca.zo
Tredefttiiation ofUod.bo.j.
ta,zi.
"The Table
TruSes . Vnmarttd life of
Ptriejiis. bo.4.ca.r3.
^romtfes of the La-vve and
the Gojpelta^rted.ho.j :ca.t7
Proutdence ofGod.bo.i,ca,i6
Titrgatorj. bo.j.ca.^,
^- .t i. O
T^edemer C^rift. ho.z.ca 16,
T^egeneratipn. bo.^.ca.j,
1{epentance. See Penance.
"Reprobate do-by their ovvne
fault brtnge vpon the/nfeUtes
the defiruSion to vvhich thej
are predejh iiate . bo.i.ca.24.
T{efrrrc£iiOfi ofChriJt. ^0.2^
ca./^.
Laft T^efurrefiion of Chrip,
ho,f.ca.zf.
T^cvvarde. Of^evvarde the
nghteoufnes of vvorkes it ill
gathered. bo.f.ca.r/.
T^or/tish See: The (i*pre*nacy
of it, ^ the beginmnge of the
1{omjsheT*ap.icj. bo.4,ca.6»
&7,
S. . ;
Sacramentes ho. 4 ra.'4
Sacraments filfsty fo named,
bo.4.ca.tp,
Satufa^ion'Popishe. bi.j;
ca 4.
Scipmatikes, bo,4.ca.r.
Scripture : The authoritie
thereof. bo.i,ca.6. That the-
doQrine efthefcripturt u jw-
cejfaryjhr vs. bo. t . ca, 9,
Sime agaitijl the holyGhofl,
•bo.s.ca.j.
Stnne originall. be.s,ca,r
Spirit.Seetheholy Ghoft.
Supper ofChrift. bo.4,cit.r;r,
i
T.
Teffameni. The likenes of the
old and new TejiAment^bo.z
ca./o,
Traditioni of men.ho.4.ca.io
Trinity. bo.j.qa.is
V.
VnEiion. be.4,ca.ry,
Vnrtaried lift ofPrteiics.ho. 4
catz.
Vocation. By Vecntion the E-
ieriia'X election of god u fia-
blished. bo.i.ca.i4,
Euery man ought ddigeniiy
to look^ vpon hit ovvne voca"
''0"» bo.s.ca 7,
Vovves, bo.4,ca.{j,
Pricked. Howe God vfeth
the worses ofthevvickid.
bo./.ca.iS. '
Workes See tMerites and
Wicked,
VVorlde.Tbe World cr(ate\
nourished, and gouemed of
^od, bo.i.ca.if»
A TABLE OF THE MAT-
TERS ENTREATED OF IN THIS
booke 5 difpofed in forme of common places,
wherein is bricfcly rchcarfed the fummc of the Docirinc
concerning euery point taught in the booke before at
largCjCoUcded by the Author.
Thefirji nttmyerjtgnifieth the bool^e.thefecond the Chapter,
the third the Section,
A. erred when he fayd that by imita-
^ rAcoluthes, tion only,not by propag3tion,(innc
Coluthes in the oldc pafTed from the firft manne into all
JChurch. Booke.4. his poftericy.z.i.5,6.
Chapter.4.Seftion.i. And though the pcftilcnce of
9. &Chap.ip. Sed.z£ finne do principally abide in the
2g. {bulc,y«itdoth not therefore per*
jidamsfall. tainc to the difcuiringe of this Do-
The fall of Adam preceded not <^rine,io difpute whether the foulc-
of intemperance of gluttony , but of the childe commeth of the en*
of infidclitie : for he defpifingc the gendringe fubftance of the father:
word & trueth of God, turned out forafmuch as the caufe of the infe-
of the way to the lyes of Sathan: dion is not in the fubftance of the
which infidelitic opened the gate fie{horof chcfoule, butbecaufeic
to ambition & pridCjwherunto was was ordained of God , that thofc
adioyncd vnthankefulneire:& am- gifcs which he atthefirfthad giuen
bition was the mother of difobc- to man,m3n (houlde haue and lofe
dience.2.1.4. them for him and his. Finally it
By the fall of Adamfith other maketh nor againft this doctrine,
creatures haue bin after a fort de- that the children of th e faithful arc
formedjit is no marucl,that all ma- faniflified.i. 1.7,
kinde was corrupted, that is to fay: That by the fal of Adam the na-
fwarued out of kinde from his firft turall gifts in man were corrupted
originall , & made fubied to curfe. & the fupcrnaturall were taken a-
This the old Doftors called Origi- way,is a Jfayinge that many haue V-
nail finne,but yet did not fo plainly fed,but few haue vnderftoode. z. z.
fee foorth this point of Dodrine as 4, 16. which fayinge is expounded.
was conuenict. In the mcane time z.x. iz. that is to fay, that the fuper-
it is proucd by reafons and teftimo- naturall gifts,faith,the louc of God,
mes of Scripture > y Pfclagius fowl/ charity toward our neighboiirs, d
L L L L iiij
v«
The Tabic.
firous cndcuor of hclincs & righ- the fame by diuerfe wayt:s.r.i4.^,'9
teoufnes were taken away, but are Not only one Angel hath feue-
reftoicdbyChnft:&thatihenatu- rail care of euery one of vs, buc
rail gifts,namely the vndciihnding they all with one confent do watch
minde , & the heart are corrupted, forourfafcty:&ihcrforeitisfupcr-
becaufe thcfoiindricsofvndcrftan- fluous to enquire whether euery
ding & the vprighcncs of hart were mahauc his Icuerall angel affigncd
both taken away ; Aifo that rcafon to be ""his kepcr.i.14.7.
in ma was not vtrcrly blotted out. Of the number and degrees of
but partely weakened and partely Angcls,it is curioufnes to enquire,
corrupted : and fo Will , becaufe it & raflincs to determine: And why,
can not be icucicd i;oin the nature whcrav they be Spuites , the Scrip-
of man, was not vuerly dtftroycd, ture pain:c:h them with wings vn-
but made thrall to corrupt dtfirci. derCherubinand Seraphin.1,14.8.
2.1. 1 2. Againft itie Sadduces and fuch
It isproucd by the teftimcnics other fantafticallmen, itis proued
of Auguftine and of the Scripture, by fundry teftimonies of the Scrip-
f God nor only fortfaw oi^fuifred, ture,that Angels arc notqualities or
but aii'o by his will difpoicd the fall infpirations without fubftancc, buc
'ofthethrtmanjSc inhim the vainc very fpirites indecdc.i.14.9.
ofhispolierity.^.z^.yjS. ' Thatfuperftition is herein to be
J.ngels. auoyded , and that we giue not to
Angels are creatures pf God, al- Angtlsthofe thingcsthat belonge
though Mofes do not exprelTc the only to God and Chrift.i. 14. 10.
in thehillory ofthe creation. 1. 14. 3 Forauoydingeofthisperiil, \vc
Of the time or order whcrin they muft conlider that whereas God v-
were created, it is not expedient to feth their feruice , he doth it not of
enquire , forafmuch as y Scripture ncede,as though he couldc not be
(which we ought to follow for our without them, but for the comfort
rulc)dcelar€thno:hingc thereof.i. of our weakcneflc. i. 14. 11. And
14,4. therefore whaifoeuer \s Oiyd of the
Why the bcauenly Spirites are miniftery of Angels, oughttobe
called Angels, Armies, Vcrtues, referred to this end,thatouercom-
Principalities,powcrs,Dominano$, minge all diftruft , our truft in God
Thrones, Goddcs. 1. 14.^. fliould be thereby the more ftrong-
Conccrninge Angels the Scrip- ly ftabliihcd,and not y they fliould
tureteachethromucli as is auayle- lead vs away from God 1.14.1a.
able for our comfort & for th^ co- That the Angels alfo were crea-
firminge of our faythjnamvriy that tedafi't the likcncs of God. 1.15.3*
they arediftributc.'S & miniflcrs of Mchbijkopsand Vatriarches
Gods bountifulncs towardc vs^and Sec Bo.4.Chap.4.Sed.4.& 7. i J
Of
The Table.
■^ OftiJe jifccndlng ofChr/fim' all our life .• C^y'tft thafwc may noc
to-He^.uen. . hereof take a Jibcrry to iinne from
Although Chiift in his rifing a- thence forward.4v-i"5.^i
gainc bcgannemore fully to fhew Thepowcr of fhckcics(asthcy
forth his glory & power : yet in his call it ) that is Co fay^theminjftcric
Afcending into hcaue he fird truly of the Church jby whif h the for-
beganne his kingdom , be<^afc he giuenes of finncs is dayiy preached
then powrcd out greater aboun- vntovs, isnottobefcucrcdfrom
dace of his Spint,morc royally ad- bapnfmc.4.15.4.
uanccd his rcigne,& fliewed grea- The feconde fruitc of fayth by
ter power both in hclpinge them baptifme, is that it ihcwcch tov$
that are his, and in ouerthrowinge our moi tjfyinge in Ghrift, & a new
his enemies . And yet thai he is Co life in him. 4. i $,f . The thirde frutc
abfcnt accordinge to the prcfencc is, that it teftificth that wc arc fo v^
of his flelhe, that he is alway eucry nitcd to Chrift , that we are parra-
whcrc accordinge to the prefence keis of all his ^ood thingcs. For
ofhismaiefty.and with the faithful which caule Chrift is called the
according to his vnfpcakablc ik in- proper obiedof b3ptifrac,and the
ui/ible grace. 2. 16,14. Apoilles baptifed into the name of
. OfChriftes (ittingcattheright Chrift, in whom we do foobtainc
hand jof his father, 3: of the mam- the matter both of our cltnfinge
folde fruite which our faith gathc- and of our regcncration,as we ob-
rcth thereof 2.16.1^,16. tsinc the caule thereof in the fa-
^uricularConfefJion. ther, &y etfcd «i the holy Ghoft.-
Sec Gonfeflion Auricular. 4.15.6.
B. It is proucd that the baptifme
Baptifme. was all one which was miniftred of
THc definition ofbaptifmc.Thc lohnand of the AnoftIes,although
firft end thereof is to feruc our fome of the olde Doftors thoughc
£aith before God , the other cnde, othcrwife.4 15.7. and that ir rriaketh
to fcrue our confcflio before me.It not to the contrary , that more a-
bringeth £0 our faith three things, bundant graces of the Spiritc are
6rfty iris aligiie of our clcanfing, poured out , finee the refurrcdion
affuringc ys that all our finnes are of Chrift. But yet there is in bap-
done away.4.i5.i.which is proucd tifme adifTerenceto be made of the
by teftimonies of y Scripture , &y perfon of Chrift from lohn, &fr6
it is not the water that clenfcth vs, the Apoftles and other minifters.
but the blood of Chrift. Sod. z. 4.1 5.8.
The forcooi baptiihie \% not re- Both our mortifying & ourclcnling
ftraincd to the time paftcbut wc arc were as by ftiadow fignified amog
by it wafhcd and clcarifcd once for the people of Ifraci^by the pafl'ag©
The Tabic
through the fca , and'the comfor- trifles added to the fimple ccrc-
tablc calling of the cloude.4. 15.9. monic of Chrift : and the other of
It is falfc whichc feme haue purely miniftring it in the Church
taught,thac by Baptifmc we are re- is (hewed.4. i f . 19.
ftored to the fame righteoufnelTc It is (hewed that to minifter Bap-
& purenefTc of nature which Ada tifme pertaineth to the miniftcrs of
had at the beginning. And there is the Church & not to priuate men,
(hewed that in the children of God much lelfe to women : and the c6-»
doremaine yet Tome leauingcs of trary obicdions arc confuted. 4.15.
fin , although the fame rcigne not 2o,zi,2i.
in them: which doth whet their Bapfifme of Infames.
endcuors, and doth not geue them The Baptifing of Infantes doth
occafion to flatter themfelucs. 4.1^. very wel agree withChriftcs infti-
10. 1 t.thc fainc is proucd by Paulc. tution , and with the nature of the
Sed.ix. figne.4. i6.&:c.
Howe Baptifmc ferueth cur co- Baptifme fucceded in the place
fc/Iion before men.4. 1 5. i ?. of Circumcifion, Wherein they be
What is the order to vfc Bap- like , and wherein they be vnUke,
tifine, both for confirmation of our 4.1^.^,4.
faith , and for a confefljon before Infantes arc not to be debarred
men, Wiiere it is {hewed that the from baptifmcjfith the Lorde doth
graces of God are not ehclofed in make them partakers of the thmg
the Sacramentjfo as they be geucn fignified in Baptifmc. 4. t^. 5. and
to v$ by the vertuc thereof. 4. i j. that the Lord doth regenerate In**
I4jI5. fantcs.Seft. 17518,19.
Baptifme is nothing cncrcafed Sith it is certainc that the fame
by y worthincffe of him that doth couenaunt , which it plcafed God
minifter it, nor diminifhed by his to make with Abraham.is fealed in
vnvvorthineiTc : againft the Dona- infantes with the outwarde Sacra-
ti{les,and our Catabaptiftes which ment , therefore ought baptifmc
require ii rcbapcifing , becaufe we alfotohaue place among them. 4,
haue bin baptifcd in the kingdomc 16.6.
of the Pope. 4.1$. 16. their argumcts Baptifing of infantes is well pro-
arc confutcd.Scd. 17,18. ucdby this that Chrift embraced
Baptifmc is a continuall Sacra- children and laycd his handes vp6
ment of repentauncc for all our them.4.16.7.
life , fo that wc neede no other Sa- A confutation of ccrtaine argu-
cramentof penance.4.19.17. ments of the enemies of infantes
Of the coniuring of the water, baptifme.4.16.8,22,2, ^125,17,28,19
the waxe Candell,the Chrc(ine,thc There commcth greate fruit by
blowing, the fpitde, and fuch other the baptizing of infantes , both tu
ihe
The Tabic.
the faitbfull parcnccs and to the 0£Baptifiiigofinfantes.4.8.x^.
children. 4. 16. p. which fruic Satan Bearing of the CroJJe,
trauailech by the Anabaptiftes tp It bchoucth that wc deny our
cakefromvs.4. 16.51. fclucsjthat wc may bearc y Croflc,
Acofutationof the aduerfadcs becaufc it is Gods wjllcocxcrcifc
arguments , faying , that there, be all his vndcr the ciofTc , beginning
other things fignified in Baptifmc at Chrift: his firrt begotten fonnc.
than there arc in Circumci(i6:that Which fcllowihip wiihChrift doth
our coucnaunt difteteth from the already geue vs great groundc of
olde couenaunt:that other are cal- patience and comforte.j. 8.1.
led children at this day than were It is for manycaufcs ncccflary
at that time.4.16.10,1 1,i2ji3,i4,i5» for vs to leade our htc vndcr a con-
A confutation of their other tinuali croiTerfirft tobeatedownc
famed differences bctweene Cir- ourarrogaceandtrutt of ourownc
f umcifion and baptifmc. Sed. i5. ftrcngth. And this remedy eucp
Alfo" of this obicdion , that bap- the moft holy do neede , as is pro-
tifmc is a Sacrament of repentance ued by the exaple of Dauid. 3.8,2.
and of faith : neither of which can Hereby our truft in God is confir-
J)e in tender infancy.4.i6.zo,i i. med;& our hope encrcafcd.Scd.j.
In them of ripe age, faith" and Secondly,that our patience may
vnderfianding ought to g9 before be tried, and we may be framed ro
baprifmc : but in infantes ,the bap- obedience, j. 8. 4. Which is moft
.tifme of the faithfull goeth before necdefuUforvs, fith the watonncf
vndcr {tanding.4s 16. 24. of our fieflie is fo great to make vs
A confutation of their error, fliakeof thcyokcofCod whenhc
vhich condemnc to etemall death doth once handle vs gently. Scd. j .
all that are not baptifed.4.i6.z6. Sometime al(b to punilhc our
This , that Chrift was not bap- offences committed : wherein wc
tifed till his age of 50. yeares , was acknowledge that he doth the of-
fer a good caufc 5 and mdkcth no- fice of a good father rowardevs,
thing for the enemies of infantes but con :ran wife the vnfaithfull arc
baptifmc. 4. 16.29. oftentimes made more obftinatc.
Why the Supper is not to be 3.8.6.
miniftred to y infantes of the faith - A Angular coforte when wc fuffer
fuli,and baptifmc not to be denied either fliame, or loflc,or any other
them.4. 16, 30. calamitie for righteoufiieiTczwhich
A long rehearfall of the argU' croflc moftproperiy bdongcthto
ments wherwith wicked Scructtus the faithfuil. 5.8.7.
.did fight againft the baptifmc of Howneccflaryitis for the faith-
infantes, and a confutation of the full.in the bittcrneffc of afflidions,
(ame argumcnts.4. 16. 1 1. tp be furni/hed with this thought^
The Tble.
that God loucth them,bui is angry whether they be Menkes , 6*- fccir-
wich their faults, 5.4. 34. 'lar,a$ Canons, Dcancs , Parfons of
Bifhops. paroches,Birti<^ps. &C.4. 5.859, 10,1 1
The name of Biihop in the old The neghgece of them that go-
Church was giuen to Tome one in uerntd Churches in y time of Gre-
cucry feuerail company of mmf- gory and Bernard.4.5^,i2.
-flers, for politikc order, and not The whole maner of ecdefiafti-
that they (houlde bearc a Lorddly call goucrnace as it is at this day in
rule oucr other.4.4.2. the papacy, is nochingc elfc but a
It was the office as well of the place of fpoylejwhcrein tiieeues do
bifhop as of other Priefts,to preach rob without lawe and mcafurc. 4.5'.
andmintftcr-theSacramentcs.4^4. *i}. '
The old Church did commonly al partes of their lifc,which Prieftes
obfcrue the order appointed by the and Bifliops. &c. vfe in the papacy;
iVpoftlcs in callingc of minifters.4. 41x4.
4.10,11,11,13.
C
With what forme the niiniftcrs Calling.
ofthe old Church were confecratc /^^ 7 efFedualonnward Calling,
after their eledion. 4.4. 14,1 f . V-^which is a fure teftimony of e--
Ofthe ceremony of ordcringc le6lion,& hangeth vpon y only free
oftruePrieftcs.4. 19.28. mcfcy ofGod.5.24.1,2.
Oftecimes the order of Prieftcs, Againft them, which in predefti-
Piophctes , and Paflors , hath bin natio do make man a worker with
moft corrupt in the Church.4.^.3, God. Alfo againft them that hang
4,5. eledion vpon that which foloweth
Men arc not boundc without cledion.5.24.g.
exception to obey the Paftors of The ccrtainety ©four elcdion is
Churches , but in the Lot d and his to be knowen by the word and cal-
%vord.4.9. ^ ^' lingc of God, and wc ought not to
What Bifhops, & of what quali- preace into the ctcrnall councell of
iies,be made in the papacy.4.5. i . God. g. 24.4.
The right of the people in ele- The father hath chofen vs one-
^lon is taken away, & the olde ca- ly in Chrift, in him therefore let vs
nons broken. 4. 5: 2,5. behold the ftedfaft grounde of our
What Prieftes arc made in the eledion.5.24.5.and fo, thatthere-
p3pacy,and to what cnde.4. 5.4,5. of alfo we may conceiue a furc co -
Of the giftes of benefices in the fidence of perfeuerance co the end.
papacy.4.5X7- J.M-<5,7,8,9. - s; j:. ,. - ••'.
How faithfully all Prieftcs in rhe Two kindcs of caUingjVniucrfal,
papacie do execute theic office, andfpecial.3.24.8.
I8
The Table.
, Tc is proticH by Jiucrfe cxnm- time alfo foolifhe although they
pies and tcllimonies of Scripture, haue a great fcecningc ofwifdom«
that the eled before their Callingc moreouer they oppreGi? confcicn-
do differ nothinge from othcf cc$ with their infinite muUitikic. 4.
mennc : and that It is falfc which io.ii,iz,i^.
feme men do dreame , that there is The popifh Ceremonies can not
a ccrtainc feede of eledion planted be executed by this coloi, that they
in their hartcs eucn from their na- be ordained for the inftrudipn of
tiuity.5. 14.10,11. yignorant,3sy Cercmonie* ofthe
, It is (hewed at large that as God law were: becaufc there app^arcth
<!oth by the efFeduiiUnefle of his, in this point a msnifeft difference
CalUnge towardc the eled » make b.etwcnc vs and the people before
perfcd thefaluation to which he Chrift.4.10. 14. ;,.
hadde by hisetcrnallcounfcllap- The popifli ceremonies arc belc-
poynted tl;e:,fo he hath his iudgc- ued to be Sacrifices clenfing (innes,
ments againft the rcprobate,wher- & deferuingc ctcrnall hfe ; they arc
by he putteth hispurpofcconcer- without dodrine , and are (hares to
ningtheminexeciition,andraaketh catch mony.4.io.ij.
a way for his pr edeftination. j. 24. Charity towarde our ncighhour. ;
I2jij,i4.&c. 7 ,; It is proued , againft the Sorbo^rr
Cardinals. — niftes , that Charity is y loue of ouj: >
When the name of Cardinals neighbour and not ofourfeiucs* 2.
firft began, and howe they haue 10 8,54. ,...,.
fuddcniy ftart vp to (o great honor. . Vndcr-jthe n^mc <^f neighbour
4.7.30. is contained cuery man , be he nc- »
Ceremonies, uer fo much a ftraungcr to vs , and
The old Ceremonies are taken our enemy.2.8.5:y.& therefore the
awayjasrouchinge their vfeoncly, Schoolemen are condemned of i-
butnotas touchm<»c their cffed, gnorance.whichofthc commaun-
for we haue the fame cffed at this demences of God, not to deiirc rc-
day moft euidcntly and effe<SuaUy uenge,& to loue ourenemics,hauc
in Chritt. And this doth nothinge made counfels,to the neccfTary ke-
diminiflic their holineffe, as it is pingc whereof monkcs alone do
proued. 2.7. 16. and beinge weyed binde themfelues : and it is proued
by tbcmfebes and without Chrift, that the oW doftors of the Chucch,
they are wortliily called of Paulc yea & Gregory himfclfc, thought
handewrytinges againft vs. 2.7.17. otherwife.2. 8. 56,^7.
The ordinances concerningc We haue ncede of patiencc,thac
Ceremonies in the Popes lawc, do we be not weary of doing good to
commaunde obferuation for the other. And we ought not to haue
moft parte vnprofiwble,and Tome- reiped to y ynworthinefic or other
^ The Table.
qualities of me which might with- boui^js forbidden vs , but alfo the
drawc vs, but to God which fo co- prefer uing of his hfc is commaun-
maundethvs.5.7.6. ded vs, becaufe man is both our
To the fulfilling of all the paries' ficfhe and the Image of God. 2.7.
of Charide , it is not enough if we 35?,40.
performe all the dutiful! deedcs of ChL'dr.",?,
Charitie,but wemuftdoitwitha See Obedience of Children co
finccrc afFcdion of hartc. Wherein parcntes.
the chicfc point is, that we take Church.
vppon ourfelucs the perfon of him The Church the mother of th^
whom wet fee to needc our helpe. faithfull.4. 1. 1,4,5. ' -'•■'
So Ihall wee auoide difdainefuU An cxpofition of this Article o^
pride and other corruptinges of theCrccde,Ibcleacyhol/Churcb
Charity, 5.7.7. 4-«i,?-
Chnft & the A potties in rehear- The holineffe of the Church fe
flnge the (iimmc of the lawe do not yet perfited. 4.8.12.
fometimeleaue out the firft table: Of theinuilible Charchiandof
not forthat itmorcauailethtorfic the vilibJe Churche , the (ignes
fumme of righteoulheflc tohue in- whereof are the pure preaching of
nocently with mcn,than to honor the worde and miniftratiohof Sa-
God with Godliricfle :but bycaufc craments.4. 8,7,8,9,105 1 r.
vnfaimcd Charity is y proofc of true Whercfoeucr thofc fignes are,
GodlincUc.1.8. 52,^5. we ought not to departc from thas
A confutation of the Pharifees fellowlhip.4 8. 1 2.
of our time , which holdc that we There may fome faulte crepe in,
are fuftified by Charity , bycauic cither in dodrine or in miniftratio
Paul fayeth that Charity is greater of Sacraments , for the which yec
then faith and hope. 5. 18. 8. we ought not tocaft of the com-,
Anexpofitioof thetenthcom- munion of that Church, and much
maundement, wherein (as in the Iclfefortheimperfedioof lifeand
former commaundemems) is for- corruptncffe or mancrs: And herein
bidden not onely ail purpofe to the Anabaptift:csarercproued4. 1.
hurt our neighbour, but alfo all lufl 12,15,14,15,16.
or defireagainrtChnrity. 2. 8.49.58. The Church is none otherwifc
God doth for -^ood caufe & worthi holy , but that it alway hath many
ly require ofvsfo ijrcate feruent- faultes,and yet it cesflcrh not to
ncfl'e and vpnghtncflc of louc. 2, be the Church , as is proued by
.8.50. teftimonies of Scripture and the
An cxpoGtion of the fixt com- experience of all ages. 4. 1. 17,
maundemct, wherein not onely the 18,19.
daughter or hatred of our neigh- See Minipery 0/ the Church.
Churches
The Tabic.
churches power as touching Ar- and fo is that fulfilled which hath
tides of faith. bene writte, that Antichritt (hould
It is proucd by the cxampleof fit in the temple of God. 4.2.11,1a.
the Apoftles and Prophets , and of A coparifon of the power which
Chrift himfelf, that whaifocucr au« the trcw Church hath in teaching,
thoritie the Church hath, is pro- with the tirrany of the Pope anrd
perly not gcuen to men , but to the his miniftcrs in forging newc arti-
word , the miniflration whereof is clcs of faith.4.8. lo.Of the papiftcS
committed to them : And there- principle , that the Church cannot
fore it was neucr lawfuil for the crrc.4.8.i5. ' • -. - '
Church,to teachc any other thing, It is falfc to'fay that it!>choue(!
than chat which (he rcceiued of the that the Church {hould ad to the
Lorde.4.8. 1,1,3,4,8,9. writingsofy Apoftles. 4.8.14,15,16.
Chrift hath euer taught his A confutation of the arguments
Church:& yet hec hath vfcd diuers which the papiftes make , to proue
maners of teaching according to that there is power gcuen to th(i
the diuerfitic of times, ere the lawc Church to cbiric ncvyc articles of
waswritten,inthe timcof ihclaw faich.4.8.11.12.
andthc Prophets, &laft of all fincc Chriji."'"-' -'*.'.'
that he himfelfwas openly (hewed - The Godhcd bf the'fe'nne fi^
in the flclhc.4.8. 5,6,7. proued.i.13.7. '
Falfe Church, Againft certainc doggcs , which
Where lying and falfehodch^th do priuily fteale away fro the fonnc
gotten the vppcrhande & reigneth, of God his cternity,a(firmingc that
there is not the Church : And this hcthcnfirftbegatobc,whenGod
isproued to be in the papacie,al- fpakc at the creation of the world,
though they there boaft of a per- i.i^.8,
pctuail fucccflion of Bifliops. 4. 2. Diuerfe tcftimonics of Scripture,'
1,2,3,4. which affii me Chrift to be Godt
They are not heretikcs or fchif- and firft out of the olde tcftament.
matikes that depart from the pa- 1.13.9,10. then out of the newc tc-
pacie.4. 2.5,6. ftament.Seft.ix.
Howe much foeuer a man make A profc of the fame Godhed,by
the beft of the faultes of the po- the workes that are in the Scrip-
pifhe Church,yettheftate thereof tures afcribed vntohim, 1. 13.12,
is no better than was in the king- alfo by his miracles and certainc
dome of Ifraell vnder lerobeam. other things.Scft.i^.
4.2.7,8,9,10. A difterence bctwcnc Chrifis
Yet by the goodnefleof God working qf miracles , and the Pro-
there remaine in the papacicccr- phets or Apoftles doing of the like*
taine fotcfteppes of the Church: x.13.13.
The Table.
" It (S pToiled by many and moft th^cTi.^.i^.9ti(^,
ftrongc tel^imonies of Scripture, Cin^k goitememcnt.
that Chrift toke vppion him a true See Publikc gouernemcnt.
fpbftancc of mans flelli , and not a Clcrh^s or Clergie,
Choft or couicrfahc Ihapcof ma, OfCJerkcs m cht olde Church^
?sthcMardoinites.fAined,noi yet 44.5?. j
ahcauenly bodyastheManiehees 'i(hn;Con'cuf:fcen:eorLn^c-
lyingly affirmed. 2»r^. I. |j ^i TUe diS'ercnce berweent: con^;
, An cxpofitipnqf ihc places of cupilcencc awdcounl'eil.z.8.49.v,o;i
Scripture, WMich M:ircicvr>\yrithcd That alt the concupjfccncesof
to the c?>nfirmati(5n of his error, men arc euill andgrhy of finhc,noC
andairooftI>o.^c:whi.ciiIVlanicheus infomuch as they are natural l',biic
wrefted,and many o^the'iivijfciples becaufe they are all inordinate h^f.
dowreft^at tl»t?4ay#i.«i j|. 2, 5 .where tcafon of-che corruption of nature,
alfo are. confuted the nev^e P4ar- And fo did Auguftine think/: , if'fi^
cionueSywhidi topFouc thatChnft be diligently wcycd.^.^.n.andthis
lokchisb9dy.ofnj>?hjog,ddhpld? i^vprou'cd by many pkces of his
that women hauc no fecdc:There: vyrit!pg«. ?.;^. 1^;. j n; ji-^junw ?hW
are alfo ccrtnineotbcr things con- ^ ; i\ConfifriQrt,jKiri^^l^,\ j.li b:."i
^tedj;VviMciv|^re5>l}^<ikidjiS'afcfQr- [ . C©pc^rning.:Canftiridr»'> ife
dities. 1.15.4. _ ..••:;"•: Schoolediiiines do {jgh't i^gainib
ifee^f^uiid^i^ofchiflmto heaUeh'. the Canoniiles ,.3ffirming that it is
SccpcAthsof Chnfi.' ■ .'. ijlot by^ tWc f onrniaundemerit 'of
^CQ Dfif^ndingofChrifilnto helL God. A confutation of ihci^guh*;
'See^^iciiatoY^Chriji,, • lyj en ts.v^hefe Upon the M -fort dot
^ Sec Mi.rit of Chriji..-^ gj < ^a : 'cql ftand,firft-becaufe the Lorde in the
See Vriefthodc &i.ofChrifl, Gofpcll did fend v Leprous jvhom
SeeBjdemc-.-Chxift.:' ' h.^ hadclGanfcdtoth^jpciefferand^
See I{efi*rreSfion cf-ChyiJi. th ere is fhcvcd the true mc^ningft
Chrifiian libtrty. o'f that doing. 5-4 4. r!:"i«
How nectifaiy is the knowledge . A confutanon of • rh^it fccond^
thereof 519,1. argument,for that the. Lorde conr^-r
Chrtftun Uberti? coniifleth in maundedhr. difciplcs tolofeand
rliree pastes ; The fitft is entreated vnwind Lazarus wbcnhc was raifcd.
of 5.19 2.-5-Thc recond.Scd.4,5,6. from death. ?. 4. 5-
Thcthird.Sed.7,8. A rrue escpofirionof twoplaces
Chriftian hbertic is a fpirituall by which they traucll to vphold
thing , and ail they do wrongfully their confcfTion : that is to fay,thac
expounde it , which either make it they which came to the Baptifme
aclokcfortheiriuftes^or doabufe of John did confefle their finnes,
it with oflFcncc of their wcake bre- and James wiilech vs to confeflc
OU''
The Table. -^'^^
otir finncs one to an other. 3.4.6. A confutation of this article,t!iat
The vfc of confclTing to a pricft (innes arc not forgeuen , and that
was very auncientjbut yet free as a the gate of paradife is {hut.&c. vn-
politikcorderjnoias alawefetby Icfrcthcrcbefiiftfirmely coceiucd
Chnftor his Apoftlcsrand after- a vowc of confefling, where alio
warde the fame was abrogate by their obie(5iJo is cofutcd/hatiodg-
NedariusBifhop of the Church of ment can not be pronounced till
C6ftantinopJe,becaureofaDcaco the caufe be heard , that is ro fay,
which had vndcry pretence abufcd that abfolutio can not be geuen till
a woman.This tyrannous lawe was alJl the finnes be rehcarfcd.5.4.18.
not laid vpon Churches before the It is no maruell that we c5demnc
time of Innocent the third, about and abohfli auricular confcfliion,
three hundred yearcs paft, and the and our aduerfarics do faifly afligne
foohfhnefre and barbaroufneffe of fo great profit vnto it,forfomuch
that ordinance is declared, j. 4.7. as on the other fideitarmethmen
WitnciTes of the faid ahrogatio, to boldncflcof finning.3.4.19.
out of Chrifoftome Bi/hop of Co- They do faifly preted that they
(lantinoplc. 5.4.8. bane the power of the keye5, fith
An cxpofition of Tnnoccntcs they are not the fucceflbrs of the
lawe concerning the confeflfion of Apoftles, nor baue the holy Ghoft>
all (innes, where are rthearfcd the forfomuch as they do daily without
diucrfe opinions of the Romiihc confideration loofc ihofe thingcs
. diuincs cocerning the number and which the Lorde hath comaunded
vfe of keye$,3nd the power of bin- to be bound,and bind what he hath
ding and loo(ing.3.4.i5. commaunded tobeloofed.9.4.20.
The Icwdneife of all the parti- It is proued faJfe that they fay y
cular articles of thciawe of confel- the power of the keyes may fome-
fing,and fpecially of thatconccr- time be vfed without knowledge,
ring the reheariing of all finnrs. foraftnuch as by that meane the
5,4. 16. and a plaine dcfcription of ablblution fhould be vncertaine.
the cruelty wherewith poor* con- Where alfo is fpoken of the abfolu-
fcicces were by diuerfe circiiftanccs tion or condenation which the tni-
tormented thercin.3.4. 17. nifters ot the Gofpel,or the church
By a fimilitude is defcribed howc do pronouce according to y word,
a great part of the world hath he- and of the certaintie therof. 3.4.21,
therto obeyed fuch illusions. That The abfolution of the pricfts in
it js an impoflible lawe , & makcth the Papacie is vncertaine , as well
men hypocrites. And the is (hewed onthebchalfeofhjmthatgfroilcth
a m6ft certaine rule of confeflion as of him that confefTcth : but co-
according to the example of the trariwife it is in the abfolution of
^Pubhcanc.3.4.18. the Gofpell, which hangethvpoH
MMMM
^^"■- The Table.
this oncly condition , if the finner our ownc caufc , when we f equirc
feke his purging in the oncly facri- comfort of our brethren , bccaufc
ficcof Chrift, anddoycldc to the the feling of finncs doth vcxe and
grace ofired vnto him.5.4.t2. trouble vs :in which cafe we muft
The Popifh Dodors, when they chicfely reibit to our paftors : and
allege for themfelues the power of this remedy is warely & modcratc-
looHng geuen to the Apoftles , do ly to be vfcd , that no bondage be
wrongfully wrcft to auricular con- brought in. The other forte is to
feflionthofe fayings which Chrift appeafc and reconcile our ncigh-
Ipakc partly of preaching of the boure , if he be in any thing offen-
Gofpelljand partly of cxcommu- ded by our fault, vndcr which kindc
nication. The errors of Lombard is contcincd their C5fefnon which
and fuch other in this matter : and haue finned fo farrc as to the of-
conccrning the maner of rcmiflion fence of y whole Church.5.4.12.1 j.
with ej:ioiningof penance and fa- The power of the Iccyes hatli
tisfaifticn. 5.4.2^. place in the three kindes of Con-
A (ummc of all before fpokcnrfic fcflio Of the frutc which they that
what the faichfull ought tothinkc confcflc do receiue thereby, by-
of auricular confcflion.5.4.24. canfe they knowc that forgcuencs
True Confepon, offinncsisdcclared to them by thc
WhntkindeofcofcflQois taught mefTcngcr of Chrift. 5.4. 14.
vs by the word of God , namely to Of cofeffion of finnes one forte
confcfic toGodthcknowcrofour isgenerallanothcrfpeciall.g.zo.p,
hartcs & of all our thoughtes. 1.4.9. Confirmation Tofi(J:e.
Out of this fccret confcffion Thcceremonieof layingon of
made to God , foilowcth a volun- handes * when the children of the
tary confeffion before men , (o ofc faithfull , which were baptifed in
as it u behouefull fot the glory of their infancie, did yelde an accopte
God or the humbling of our felues. of their faiih.4. 19.4.
And of this fccod kinde there was Of the popiflie facramet of Con-
an ordinary vfe in the old Church, firmation foifted in place of thac
& i% alfo in the Church at this day. holy inftitution.4.19.^.
But yec extraordinarily it ought That the exaple of the Apoftles
after a fpeciall mancr to be w^^i^ iswrogcfully alledged for defence
whenfoeacritfhallhappcthatthe thcr:of.4.i9.6.
people be giltic in any generall of- It is blafphemy when they call it
fence, or to be plaged with any ca- the oile of faluation. 4.19,7,8. and
bmitic.Of the profile of fuch con- when they fay that none are made
feltion.5.4. 10,1 1. full Chriftians till they be annoin-
Of two other forts of priuate co- ted with the Bifliops Confirmation.
feffion:of which the firi^ is vied for St^.^, and when chcy fay that this
annoin-
The Tabic. » *'
annointingc is to be had in greater hauc no authority , vnlcffc they he
reutreccthan Baptifnic.Scifl.io,!!. aflcmbled in the name of Chrift:
] CIS to be wilhcdjihatthemaner and what that is. 4.9. 2.
of the oldc Church were brought It is falfe which the Papiftcs af-
in vie againe , to call children to firmc;y truth remaincth not in the
gcucaccompt of their faith. 4.i<;.i3. Church vnlefle it be among the pa-
Confcicnce. ftors,and that the Church it fclfe is
ConfcienccSjwhen they fcke af- not,vnitflc it remainc to be fene in
fiance of their lutiiHcation before generallCouncels.4.9.3,4,5,6,7.
Godjought to forgettc ail the righ- What things are to be wcyed in
tcoulaeflc of the lawc. 5. 19.^,^ fearching y authority of any Cou-
Thc Co'cicnces of the faitht'uU celhand that Augulhnc prefcribcth
do not follow the law as colbamed a very good way therein. 4. 9.0.
by neccdity of the lawe , but being Counccls one againft another,
free fro y yoke of the lawe, do volu- 4 9 ^.and eucn in thofe former and
tarily obey y will of god. ^.19. 4,5,6. auncietCouceJsare foundefauUes
Of y freedom of Cofciece m out- and errors.4.9,io,n .
ward & mdifferent thmgs. 5.19 7,8. Creation of the World.
The Confcicnccs of riic faithtull Although God ought to be kno-
bcing fet at liberty by the benefit wen by the Creanon of things.ycc
of Chrift » arc marie free from the Icaft the faithfull fliould fall away to
power of all men: and bowcthis the fained inuetios of the heathen,
is to be vndcrftode: where alfois his will was that the hiftory ofthc
fpokenof the fpiriruiU and ciuille Creatio (hould remainc written,&
gouernement,and wh;'.tditrcrencc the time thereof exprefTcd in the
is tobeputbetwcncthc ^.19.14,15. Scripturc.i.14.1. where thtir vngod-
What is Cofcicncc'.and in what ly fcoffing is confuted , which afkc
fenfe Paul faith, tha-. the magilVac why it came not fooner in Gods
muft be obeyed for confcience. mind to creatheaue& earth 1. 14.1.
5.19.15,16. For the fame purpofc it is rc-
What IS Confcience : and of the hearfed,that God ended his workc,
common difference betwene the not in a moment, but in fix dayes:
temporall court , and the court of and likewifc the order is fet forth,
Confcience.4.10.5,5. namely that Ada was not created
of Counceis. till God had fi-.fte furnilhcd the
We muft keepeamcaneinho- worlde with all plenty of good
noring of Counceis , that we take things.i.i4.i,22.
nothingaway from Chrift, and our A confutation of the error of
do<5t.inefor the moft parte is con- Manichcus concerning two origi-.
firmedby auncientCouccls.4.9. 1, nail beginnings. 1.14.?,
By the Scriptures tlic Counccls It is proucd by the Scriptures that ,
MMMM ij
^*a^ TheTabk
the knowledge of God which ap- that we do rtotwieh vnthantcefuH
pearethmy workmanifhip of the ncglcdinge or forgctfulnes palfc
world,can not by it felf alone bring ouer his vertucs which he prefen'
vs into the right way. i. 5. 13. and teth apparantly to be feene in his
yet are we rightfully without all creatures. 1. 14.2 i.fecondly,thatwc
cxcufe.Sc<fk.i4. may Icarne to apply them to our
Although the beholding of heauc felues , whereby wee may ftirrc vp
and earth and the confideration of our felues to the truft, inuocation,
the ordringe of things pertaining praife,and lone of him.aj4,ia.
to men , do moue vs to worfhippe Crojfe,
God, yet all thefc thinges paflcd Sec Bearing of the Crofle.
away \»ithout profit,euen from the D.
wifeft Philofophers.i.f . 10. Deacons,
Hcrupo came the infinite num- /^P Deacons and the two fortes
ber of gods , and the contrarieties VJof them.4. j.9.
ofopinionamogthcfedcsofPhi- In the olde Church the office
Jofophcrs concerning God.i.j.ii. ofDeacos was the fame that it was
The fubftance of God isincom- in the Apoftles time. Of fubdca-
prehenhblc : but in his workcs , by cons and archedeacons, and when
cngrauing ccrtame pointcs of hrs they firftbegan.4.4.^,
glory therein , he hath after a cer- How y Church goods were vfed
taine mancr prefcnted himfelfc to and beftowcd in the olde Church,
be feene. 1. 5, 1. 4.4^,7.
The wifuomc of God is teftified, Of popifhe Deacons , their of-
not oncly by thofe thinges which fice,and the ceremony of their or>
philofophcrs and learned men do deringe.4.i9.p.
finde by fpecuhtioninheaucn and Of popiflie fubdeac6$,and their
carth,but alfo which common men trifling officc,and the fonde manec
do perceiueby iheonely hcipeof of theirordrjing,4.i9.^j.
their eyes i.^.z. Of popiflic Deacons and their
That we may with trewe faith inftitution.4.f.if.
conceicic fo much as bthoucih vs The Papiftes haue no trew Dea-
to know coccrningGodjit is good conry Icftc, forafmuch as ail the
to Icarne y hsftory of the Creation difpofition of Church goods amog
of the world , in fuch fort as Mofes them is openly turned to facnlcgc
hath fet it forth, thechicfe pointes androbbery.4.5.i6,i8,!9.
wherof arc briefly rehearfed.1.14. 20. A confutation of the (hameleP-
The co'ideration of the workes neffe of certaine papjftc$,which fay
of God, that is to fay ,of theCrea- thnt the riotous cxcelTc of priefts
lion of all things , ought to be ap- and of all the popiih Churchjs the
piiedio two prmcipall endcs:fitft glorioufaelfe of the kingdome of
Chrift
The Table. ^^f'^fy^^^
Chrift which the holy prophctes contcineth the mifteiy of a great
ipakc of beforc.4.^.17. thing, and is of no fmall imponacc
Death ofchriji. to the cflfc^fkof ourrccicmptio. Di-
Ahhough chrift hath by f whole ucrfc cxpofidons of this article arc
courfc of his obedience , that is to rchcarfed and confuted. 2. 16. 8,9.
fay by his whole life & all the partes A trewe,godly,holy and comfof -
thcrcofjrcdeemcd vs,5'Ct the Scrip- table cxpofiiion thereof out of the
ture to fct forth more planely the word of God, which is alfo confir-
manerofoorfaluatiojdothafcribc medby theteHimony of ihcoldc
the fatne as peculiar and proper to Dodors , that Chrift did not: oncly
the Death of Chrift. In the which fuffer a bodily death, but alfo did
the voluntarie yeldinge of Chrift fcclc the rigor of Gods vengeacc,
hath the tirftplace,which yet was fo whereby he might both appcafc
volucary as he gaue ouer his ovvnc his wrath and fatisfic his iuft iudgc-
affcc^io not without ftrife. Alfo his metsand therefore it bchoucd that
codcmnation is to be confidercd: he ftiould,as it were hade to handc.
Wherein two things are to be no- wreftle with the power of Hell and
ted,namcly that Chrift was reputed with y horror of cuerlafting death,
among the wicked,and yet that his yet was God not at any time cither
innocccy was oftctimes teftificd cue his enemy, or angry with him. Bur
bytheiudges ownemouth.i. 1.5. he did fuffcr the greuoufnelfe of
ThemanerofhisDeathisto be Gods feuerity,inrefpe<5ithathcc
marked, that is to fay, the accurfcd being ftricken and beaten with the
croflc. And it is declared by many handc of God, did feclc all the
tcftimonicsofEfay &theApoftles, tokens of Gods wratlx and punifti-
that this behoued fo to be)that the tnent.i. 1^. 10.11.
curfte which was dewe to vs being A cofutation of ccrtainc wicked
caft vpon him and fo ouercome & and vnlcarned men , which at this
taken away, wee fhould be deli- day do finde faultc with this expo-
ucrcd. And this was figuratiuely re- fition,crying out that the fonne of
prefented in the facrifices of Mofes God hath wronge done ro Him,and
bwe , which at the laft was perfor- that he is charged with delpcracio,
mcd in Chrift the originall truth which is contrary to faith. There-
of all figures. 2.1.6. fore it is proucd againft them with
Both in the Death and buriallof manifeft teftimonies,that thefe two
Chrift a double benefit is fet before things do very well ftade tocjcther,
vs,y is to fay , deliuciace fro Death jhat Chrift feared , was troubled in
wh creunto we were in bor.dage,& fpirit , was afraide, was tempted in
jhe mortifying of oar tlcflie.2.1.6. cucry pointc as wearc,andyettha(;
Defcetiding ofchrlji to HelL hce is without finne,2.x6. 12.
The Defending of Chrift to Hel! VeueUes.
MMMM iij
The Tabic.
Thofc things that the Scripture wounded and beaten downerbut he
tcachcth concerning DeuelsjCendc oncly gcueth the wicked to him to
commonly to this ende , that wee goucrne , and to vfc his power vp-
flioulde be carefull to beware of pon ihcirfoules and bodies 1.14.18.
their dcceites , & furniOi our felues A cohitation of chcm which fay
with thofe weapons which maybe that Dcuells are nothing els but
able to beat back the moft mighty euell aftl'dions or perturbations:
enemies. 1.14.1^. and it is proued by tcfiimonies of
That we rtiould be y more ftirred Scripture , that they are mindcs or
vp to do fo,ii fheweth vs that there fpirits endued with fenfc and vn-
i& not one or two DcLcls, but great derftanding. 1.14.19.
armies of euell fpiritcs that make Difcipline.
warreagainft v$:and in what fence Difciphntis a thing moft neccf^
it fometunefpeaketh of the Deucll fary in the Church 4.11.1.
in the lingular number. 1.14. 14. Of priuate admonifhings,which
This ought to enftame vs to a is the fii ft foundation of the Diici-
continuall warre with thcDeuell, plineoftheChuich.4. 12.2.
for y heiseuery wherccalkd cne- Of the Ecclcfiafticall Senate,
my to God and vs. 1.14. 1 <;. that is to fay, the feniors pr elders.
The Dcuell is naturally wicked, which together with the biiliops
a murderer, a her, and forger of all hauc y ouerHghtof mancrs.4.^.8.
malitiQufncs.i.i4.i5.Buc this euel- Princes as well as rhecomn".on
ncfl'e of nature is not by creation, people ought to bcfubicd to the
but by corruption, i.i 4,16. Difcipline of the church,& fo was it
It is curiofity to enquire of the wont to be in the olde time. 4. 11.7,
caufc, maner, time and falTiion of Of the olde Difcipline of the
the fill of the euell Angels, foraf- cleargy, and the yearly afi'emblingc
much as the Scripture leaueih it of piouinciall fynodesrandhowe
vnipoken.1.14. i^. this order is buried in the papacy.
This th'- Deuell hath of him- fauing that they kepc ccrtainc flia-
Iclfeandof hisowne naughtineife, dovvesthercof.4. ii.iz.
dcfiroufly and purpolejy to ftriue E.
a^ainft God, but hec can do and Excommimicaticn.
performc nothing vnlclfe God be T 7f rHat is the power of the iii-
Willing and graunt it 1.14. 17. V V nfdidion of the Church,
Go<i fo tcmpcreth this gouern- and howe neceflary and aungent it
menr, that hec geueth Satan no is.4. 11.1,4.
reigne ouer the foules of the faith- Of the power of binding and
full , forafmuch as in the ende they lofinge , fo much as pertainerh to
eucr obteine the vidorie, although Difcipline,vvherein there is fpoken
in fome particular doings they be of£xcommunicationi4.ii.2.
This
i^y
The Tabled ^¥5^wi^
This power of the Church is di- priuate metvought not to cJepattc
ftavftefrom the ciuilc power, and from the Church, neither ought
the one is a hclpe to the other, the pallors to ih^ke of their n:»t-
Thcrcforc the opinio of fomc men ni(lene.4.i2.ii.
is falfe , which thinke that it ought Againft y pccifenefiTc of the olde
to haue no place where are Chri- Donatjftcs 5: of the Anabaptiftes
ftianmagiftratcs.4. II. 1,5,8, of our daycs, which do acknow
This is a ftayed and continuall Icdjjc no congregation of Chrirt,
order in the Church , and not en- but where there is in eucry point
duringonely for atimc.4.11.4. an AngeIikeperfe(2ion.4. iz.ii.
Of the right vfe of this iurifdi- If the corruption of any finne
ftion in the oldc Church:and howc haue infcftcd the whole mulntude,
this power belonged not to one the rigorourneiTeofdifciplmemuft
Tnin alone , but to the aflembly of be tepcred with the m«rrcy,leaft the
elders.4. 1 1. ^,^.and Ch.ir.Sed.7. whole body be dcftioyed.4. i ?.. 1 5.
Of theExcommunicatJoofthe F*
church, & y authority thcror.4.ii.4 Taith,
Three endes which the Church 'T^He njme of Faith ochciwire.
hath regarde vnto in corredions JL taken among holy writers than
?nd EKcommunication4.i2.^, it isamongthcprophane.4.ir.ij»
Of exercifing the difcipline of Howe it is to be vaderftodc that
the Church according to the pro- God is the obicde of faith. 2.6.4.
portio of finncSjforafmuch as feme Of faith. And heere the Sophi-
be pnuate and fomc be pybhke, ftcrs are rcproued , which vndcr*
fomebe negligent dcfaultes, fomc ftandc nothing els by this wordc
be hainous offcnccs.4.1 1. ^,4,6. faith, but a common aflcnte to the
In Excommunicaiion fcuerity hittoryofthe Gofpcll,& dofimply.
ought to be tempered. And in this call God the obicd of faith, in th<p,
behaife is noted the extreme rigo- meane time leauing out Chrift>:
toufncfleoftheinoldetime.4.iz.8. without whom there is no faith,
Euery priuate man ought toe- nor any acceflTetoGod.^.!.!.
fteemethcm that beExcoaimuni- A confutation of the Scholc'^
cate as ftrangers from the Church, menncs do<3rine coccrning vncx-
but not to accompt the paft hope, prcfled faith»wheras faith requireth
but to cndeuour to the vttcrmoft an exprefle rcknowledginge of the
pf their power tobringe them into goodnclTc of God , in which ftan-
the way againe.4.12.9,10. deth our righteoufneire.j.i.r.
If the benchp of elders do not fo Our faith , fo longe as wee arc
diligently corrcd faultes as they waueringc in the world,is cnwrap-
ought , or if the pallors can not a- ped with many remnautes of igno-?
Hi^nd^ all things 9$ tbpy wpuld,yc5 rauncc , and in 41 things infidelity
MM MM jiij
., ^^m' The Tabic.
is cuer mingled with faithjwhcreof from a Godly affcdion. 5.2.8,
many examples are fccne in the di- This wordc faith hath diuerfe'
fciples of Chrift before that they {ignificati6$,and is fometimc taken-
camp to perfede light , yet this is for the power to do miracles , with
ftill moft trewe, that vnderftanding which giftofGod,fomtimcy wicked
iseuerioined with faith, j. 2, 5,4. are endued: Sometime it isfigura"
There is a certaine obedience to tiuely taken for chat knov/ledgc of
Chrift, & aptncffc to learne, with a God which is in fome wicked men,
dcfire to profit , which is called by which is rathera fliadowe & ymagc
the name of faith, whereas it is but of faith , of which faith there arc
a preparati5 to faith, and that fame diuerfe fortes in them. 3. 2.9. 10.
may be called an vnexpreflcd faith: The reprobate haue alfo feme-
yet it farre differcth from the pa- time fuch a like feeHng as the clef):
piftcs inuention. ^.2. %. haue,yet they do not fully conceiue
The ircwe faith or knowledge of y force of fpirituall grace, but only
Chrift , is when we cocciue him in confufely.Neuertheleifc the fame
fuch forte as he is oft'r ed of the Fa- is a certaine inferior working of the
ther, that ii to fay, clothed with his holy Ghoft.But this feling differcth
Gofpell. Andfaiihhathamutuall farre from the peculiar teftimon/
relation to the word,and the word which he geueth to the eled. 5.2.11.
to faith , becaufe the wordc is the Yet is not the Spirit deceitftill,
fountaine of faith , the groundc of which lightly fprinkleth the repro-
faith , and the inirrourc in which bate fometimc with fuch a knowe-
faith beholdeth God.^.;i.6. Icdae of the Gofpell, and feling of
Faith, although it afl'ente to all the loue of God as afterward doth
the partes of the word of God, yet vanifh away. Somtime alfo there is
moft properly ic hath regarde therin ftirred vp intheir hartcs a certaine
to the good will and ntercy of God, defire of mutuall loue toward God,
that is to fay, the promifes of grace but fuch a loue as is a hired and not
grounded vpon Chrift , for the vn- a harty loue. At lengthe it is con-
derftandmg and certainty whereof, eluded that there be fome which
the holy Ghoft lightcneth our min- do not fame a faith , & yet do lackc
des and ftrengt-hencth our hartes: the trewe faith ; Which is alfo pro*
Hereupon is gathered the defini- ued by tcftimonies.g.2.i2.and fuch
tionoffaith.5.2 7. a feling is in the Scripture called
A confutation of the Sophifters fa»ch, although it be vnpropcrly foi
diftinftionoffaith,formcd&form- called. ^.21^.
lefTe : whereby it appearcth that Faith is fometimc taken for the
they neuer thought of the fingular foundt dodrine of religioniand the
gifte of the holy Ghoft, forafinuch whole fumme ther of : contrariwifc
as faith can in no wife be fcuered iboKtime ic is retrained to fome
The Table. '-'f^f-npS^
funicular obie£l,& fometime it fi- neuer fall and depart from that fiirc
gnificth y miniUery of tiic Church affiance which they haue concci-
j.z. 1 J. ued of the mercy of God, but ftri-
Faith is moft rightfully called uingcwith their ownc wcakcncflc
Icnowledge and fciencc , and yet is they alway get the vppcr hande ac
fiich a knowledge as rather confi- laft : which is proucd by many ex*
ileth of certainc perfwafion than of amplcs in Dauid. ^.i. 17.
ynderftandiftge.forafmuch as that A defcriptio of the battcll ofthe
which our minde conceyucih. by flefli & the fpirite within a faithfull
Faithismoftinfinitc.3.2.14. foule.3.2.18.
Faith is not cotent with a dout- The aiTuicdncfle of Gods good
full opinion or a darke conceiuing, will.^.z.iS.
^uc requireth a ful and fettled alfu- A confutation ofthe moft pcfti-
ledncfl'e: & hereunto are to be re- lent futtle reafoningc of certainc
ferrcd all thofc titles of commen- halfe papiftes,which although they
dation wherewith the holy Ghoft confcfife that fooft aswclookev-
lettcth foorth the authority ofthe pon Chrift,we findc plentiful mat-
M'oi d of God. ^. 2. 1 5 . ter to hope wel, yet vvil nedes hauc
Many do fo conceiuc the mercy vs to wauer and dout in confidcra-
«f Gocijthatthey receiue very hilc tionofourowne vnworthines.And
comfort thercofjbecaufe they dout it is proucd that we ought ncucr-
whcther he wil be merciful to the- thclcfle to looke for aflured falua*
fclues or no: but there is a far other tioniforafmuch as Chrift by a ccr*
feelinge ofthe aboundant liore of tainc maruclous communion doth
Faith,the chiefe ground whereof is daily grow together more & more
that we do nocthinke the promi- into one body with vs. 5.2.24.
fcs to be true without our fclues So foone as we haue any one
oncly > but rather that by inwardly drop of Faith we begin to beholde
embracing them we may make tiic God mcrcifuil vnto vs , although a
pur owne thereupon is gathered, farreofindcde,yctwith fo aflfured
who may truely be called Faithfull, fight , as we knowc we arc not dc*
3.2.15, 16. ceiucd:Both thcfc pointes are pro-
Though the Faithful in reknow- ued by tcftimonics of Paul. g.i. 1^,
iedginge the goodneflc of God to- 20,
ward them are not only oftentimes It is (hewed by examples , howe
tempted with vnquietneiFejbut al- Faith armeih and fortificth it fclfc
(p are fometime fiiakcn with moft with the word of God to bcare the
f^rcuous terrours:yet this wiihftan- violent .ifraukes of teniations, and
(deth not but that Faith brmgeth howe the godly minde neuer fuflfe-
afibrednelTe with it, becaufe how- rcth the affiance of Gods mercy to
jk)cucr they be troubled, yet they be plucked away from it , alchcugh
^pr The Tabic.
It be affiled with many remnants haue thcmfclues , that fomc cr-
of vnbcliefe and diftruft. j.i.x i. rours are mingled with their Faith,
In the good will of God, which and they feme to palTe the boudc$
Faith IS fayd to haue rcfpcd vnio, of the word, but yet fo, that Fay th
although Faith do chiefely looke hathalway thevppcrhand:Thisi$
VDto the aifured expedation of e- proued by the examples of Sara Sc
ternali life, yet there are alfo con- Rebecca , whomc in the crooked
tained promifes of this prefent hfc turninges of their minde, God did
and a perfed furctie of all good by ^fecret bridle holde fali in the
thingcs , but the fame fuch as may obedience of his word. g.2. 5 1.
be gathered of y word: Both thefc By reafon of our blindcneffc and
poyntes are confirmed by teftimo- ftiffeneckcdnes , the word fuflifcth
nies of Scripture. J. 2.28. not to make vs haue Fayth, vnleiTc
Faith , although it embrace the the Spirit of God do cnligh(e out
word of God in cuery point , that minde , & ftrcngthcn our hart with
is to fay in the commaundcmcntes his power ; & the fame Spirit is not
alfo and m the prohibitions and onlythcbeginnerofour Faith, but
thretnings, yet hath her fundation alfo doth cncreafc it by degrees, j.
and proper marke whereunto it is 2.^}.
direded , in y free promifc of mer- Although it feemc to the moft
cy : and for this reafon the Gofpcll parte of men a moft ftraunge do-
is called the worde of Fayth, and is drine , that no mann can beleuc in
fct as contrary to the law. j. 2.29. Chrift, but he to whom it is giuen.
Yet do we not by this diftinftion yet, it is proued to be moft true by
tcarc Faith in fonder as Pyghius rcafons , teftimonies of Scripture,
(hamcfullycauillcth.^.s.50. andexamples.5,2.j4.
Faith doth- no IclTe needc the Therefore Faith is called tho
%vorde of God, than the frute doth Spirit of Faith,the worke and good
ncdc the huely roote of the trcc,& plcafure of God.* and it is a fingular
with the worde muft beioyncda gift, which he giueth byfingulat
coniideratio of the power of God, priuilege to whom he will : as it is
without the which,mens cares will proued by notable fcntenccs taken
cither not willingly hcarc y worde, outof Auguftine.3.2.35;.
or not eftecme it worthily. His po- It is not enough that the minda
wcr is to be confidered,in that that be cnUghtencd with vnderftanding
it is cffcduall , that is to fay by the of the worde, vnleflc alfo the alfu-
workcs of God , & by his benefites rcdneffe of the word be poured in^
cither particular or ancient & fuch to y very heart:both which thinges
as he hath beftowcd vpon y whole y Spirit worketh:which is therforc
Church.j.2. 1 1. called the feale,the pledge, and th^
The Faithfull oftentimes fobc- Spiriic ofpromifc.j.?.^^.
Although
The Table.
Although Faith be toflcd with ^.1.41.
diucrfc doutings,yct it alway at the By reafon of this conioyning &
laft eJcapcth out of the gulfc of tc- alliacc of Faith & hope, the Scnp-
tations, and receiueth moil fvveetc tuie doth many times vfe thofc
quietnes.^. 2^-57. two wordes without diffcrcncc.and
A confutation of the damnable fomtime loyneth them together. A
doftrine of the Schooleme , which confutation of the errour of Peter
iay that we can none otherwife dc- Lombardcjwhich makcth two fun-
tcrminc of the grace of God to- dations of Faith, that is to (ay , the
ward vSj than by morall conied jrc grace of God,& y merit of workes,
5.2.58. 3.1.4?.
They are proued to be miferably Of the impcrfedion of FaithjSc
blinde,in faying that it is rafhnes for the confirming & cncreaJe thereof.
vs to concemc an vndouted know- 4. 14.7,8.
ledge of the will of God : A good Of the fumme of our Faith, which
comparifon of them and Paule in we cai the Credc.or Simbole of the
this poind of dodrine. 5. 2.39. Apoftlcs.2.16.18,
A confutation of their rriflingc The conclufion of the i^.chap-
fliiff, that although we may take v- ter,whcrcin are briefely contained
p6 vsto iudgc of the grace of God the benefices chat came to vs by
accordinge to the prcfent ftate of thofe thinges that arc fpokcn con-
rigliteoufncs,yet tlie knowledge of ccrninge Chrift in the Simbole of
pcrfeuering to the ende abideih in the Apoftles. 2. 16. icf.
Tufpenfe. J. 2,40. See injiificatio'n of Faith.
It is proued that the definirio of Tafting.
Faith taught in this chapter Sed:.7. Of chat part of Difcipline of the
agrceth with the Apoftles defini- Church, which cocerneth theap-
tion. Hcb.Cap. 1 1. And the errour pointing of Faftini:;es,or extraordi-
of the Schoolenaen.that charitie is nary prayers: & how paftors ought
before Faith and Hopc,is confuted to vfe it.4. 1 2. 14, 16, 1 7.
by thcteftimony ofBernardc. 5.2. Iris to beprouided that nofu-
41. perlhtion crepe in in Faftiog. 4. 12.
Hope is alway cngendred of Faith, 19.
& is the vndeuidcd companion of The holy and rightfull Faftingc
Faith, fothai whofoeucr lacketh hath three endes.4. 12. if.
hope, is proued alfo to hauc no The definitio of Fafhng,4. 12.18.
faith . Alfo Faith is nourilhcd and Of the fuperftition of Lent, and
firengthened by hopc:and how ne- the diuerfity of obferuing the fame
cefTary arc the helpesof hope to Fafting.4.1 2.20,21.
ftablilhc Faith , which is aflaylcd Teare.
\yich fo many fortes of tentacions. The faichful arc ofcentimcs trou^
The Tabic.
tiled with Fcarc & diftruft by rea- that this in the forfaking of our fel-
fon of the fcchngc of their ownc ucs , without the which there is a
iTcakenes. 3.2. 17. world of vices cndofed in the foulc
AnothctkindeofFeareconcci- of roan, and if there be anyfcming
ucd in a godly heart, cither by exa- of vertuc at all , the fame is corrup*-
pics of Gods vegeance againft the ted with wicked defire of glory. 3.7,
wickedjorbyconlideration ofhis 2.
own mifery:Such Fcarc is fo much The forfaking or mortifyinge of
not cotrary to faith , that the faith- our felucs , is partly in refpeft of
full are much exhorted to haue it. me,and partely, yea, and chiefly in
Neither is it any maruell , if there refped of God. Toward other men,
be in a Faithfull foule both Fcarc the Scripture commaundeth vs to
and Faith , fith on the other fide in do two thinges:namely to prefer re
the wicked there arc both dull nc- them in honor before our fclucs,&
§Ugcccandcarefulneflie.3.2,2252 3. with vnfained truth to employ our
The Fcarc of God proccedcth felues wholly to procure their co-
out ofa double feling,namely whe modities . Howe the firft of tbefc
wc honor God as our father , and points is to be performedjis taught
fcarc him as our Lord:Ncither is it in the ^.j.^.Sc alfo how the Scrip-
any maruell if one mindc hauc turclcadethvsby thehandtothc
both thoreafFcdions.3.2.26. fecondc point is (hewedin the 3.7.
This Fcarc diflfereth from the $.
Fcarc of the vnfaithful, which they See certaine things pertaining to this
comonly cal a feruile Feare.3.2.27 jfwr^o/e.j. 20.43.
Offorfah^ingofourfelues, Vreewill,
The firft beginning of framing Man was endued with Freewill
ourlife after rhe rule fet foorthin in the firft eftate of his creation, i,
the lawe, is to confider that we arc i j.8. which he loft by his fall . Of
not at our own liberty.buthallowed this the jPhilofophers were igno-
re dedicate to God. And therefore rant,and fo all fuch as follow them,
wc ought to forfake our felues, and giuing Freewill to man , arc vttcrly
our own rcafon (which as the Phi- deceiued.i. 1 5.8,
lofophers thinke, ought alone to Thephablcncfle or weakc po-.
be obeicd)to the ende that we may wer of Freewill , which was in the
be gbucrned by the word & Spirite firft man, doth not excufe his fall. i.
of the Lord. 3. 7. 1. - ij.8.
Alfo that we ought not to fccke It is as well for our profit, as for
thofe thinges that arc ourowne, the glory of God, to acknowledge
but thoft thinges that arc accor- ail our ftrcngth to be but a ftafte
ding 10 the will of the Lord,and do made ofa reede, yea , but a fmoke.
fcruc to aduaunce his gloric . And In the meane time we muft be--
war©
The Table
warc,that while wc take al vprieht^ all orhcr)& fpccially Cliryfoflome,
ncflc from man , wc do not there- do cxccedc mcafure in aduauncmg
of take occafion of flothfulnefl'e. Frcwill.But all the oldc wr) tcrs gc-
But rather we ought thereby to be nerally, except Augiiftine,do fo va^
ftirred vpp€ to feckc in God all the ry and vvauer in this poinft of do*
goodnes whereof we our fclues are drinc,ihat there can almoll no ccc
voide . The defenders of Freewill tainety be gathered of their wry-
do rather throw it downc hedlong tingcs.They which came after the,
than ftablKhit.z.i.i, fcllone afteran other to worfe &
The Philofophers determine worfe.Thc definitions of Freewill
three powers of the foule, Vnder- outof Origcn, Auguftine,Bcrnard,
ftanding,Scnfe,& Wil or Appetite: AnfelmejPcrcr Lombard, & Tho-
and they thinke that the reafonof mas.2.2.4.
mans vnderftandinge fuffifeth for In what things they do commo-
his good gouernancc'that wil is by ly giuc Freewill to man , and of the
fenfe moucd to euill, fo that it doth three fortes of mans will.z.a. 5.
hardly yeelde it felfe to re3fon,and AKb of the common diftindtion
fometimeis diuerfly drawen from of the three fortes of iibcrtic.2.3.
the one to y otherjbut yety it hath ^.
a free cledion & can not be fto{>- Whether man be wholly depri*
pcd, that it may foUowe reafon her ued of power to do good , or whc »
guide in all things rfinally that ver- ther he hauc yet fomc powec
tues and vices are in our powers.2. thoughtitbe wcake:whcrc it is (po*
2.2,5. ken of the common diftindion of
The Ecdcfiafticall wrytcrs , al- grace working and grace workinge
though they acknoweledgcd the together , and what is amifle in the
foundeneflfe of vnderft3nding,and fame diftindion. 2. 2,^.
the freedome of will to haue bin Forafmuch as it can not other-
fore wounded by finne, yet hauc wife be faid that man hath Freewil,
fpoken too much philofophically butbicaufehedotheuilofhisown
of this matter. The old wrytcrs did will,& not by copulfion, it had bin
it for this purpofe , firft bccaufe very good for the church that this
they were loth to teache athinge word Freewill hadncuerbinvfed,
that fhoulde be an abfurdity in the which had raifed vp men to a dam-
common iudgemcntofmcn,&ai'o nable truftof themfelues. Theoli
fpccinlly ieaft they iTiouidc gmc a writers alfo do oft declare what they
new occalion of flothfulncs to the meane by that word, fpecialiy Au-
flelli beingc already too much dull gudiPjOiit of whom there are ma-
to goocnes, as appcnreth bv m my ny places dleged, where he wcak-
fayingcsof Chryfoftomeand Hie- neth and mocI:eth the ftrcngth
rome. The Greeke dodors aboue thereof, both when he callethi^
mwm^ The Tabic.
Bondwill,& when he CTpoundcth the (inner to obcy:and there is rtie^
the thing it felfe as it is at large, z. v/cd what cfFed the lame do workc
i-7>8. both in the wicked & in the faith-
Although the old Ecclefiafticall full. 2. 5.4,5.
writers do fometimetoomuchad- It is not to be gathered by the
uaunce FreewilJ, and haue fpoken commaundementes & law of God,
doutfully and duicrfly in that mat- that man hath Freewill & ft. en^ih
tcr : yet it appcareth by very many to performe them , for God doth
ofthcirfayinges, that they litle or nor only commaunde what ought
nothinge cfteemmge mans power, to be done, but alfo pjomifeth
gaue the whole praife ofal goodnes grace to obey. 2. 5 6,7,^.
10 the holy Ghoft. Many fuch fen- This is proucd as well in the co-
tenccs are rchcarfed out of Cy pria, maundementes whichrequire the
AuguftinCjEucheriuSjChryfoftom. firft conuernon to God , as alfo in
a.2.9. thofe which fpeakc limply of the
The power of mans will is not obferumge of the lawe , and thofe
to be,.weyed by the fuccefle of which commaundracn to continue
things, but by the choife of ludge- in thereceiucd grace ofGod. For
mem and the aft'cdion of Will. 2.4. the fame God which rccjuireth
8. thofe thingeSjdothteftific that the
It is proued againft the dcfen- conuerfionofa finnerjholmeffeof
ders of Freewil that finnc is ot nc- life, ftcdfaftnes of continuance, arc
ceflity, & yet ncuertheles ought to his Free giftSjand the praife therof
be imputed:alfo that it is voluntary, is not to be parted betwene God
andyet cannot be auoided.2.5.1. and man.2.5. 8,9,11.
A folurion of an other obiedion The conditional! promifes,as,Tf
of theirs , where they fay that vn- ye wi!l,Ifye heare,and fuchhke,do
lefTe both vcrtues & vices procecdc not prouc that there is in manne a
ofFrcc elcftionofwill, it were no Freepower of wiUingorhearinge:
rcafon that man fhoulde eitlier be yet it is proued that God doth not
punifhed or rewarded. 2. 5.1. mocke mcnne in fo bargaynmge
Alfo an other obiedion, where with them. Alfo what is the vfe of
they fay that if this were not the fuch proteflations^, bothtowaidc
power of our will , to choofc good the godly and toward the vngodly.
or cuill, then of necellity either all 2.5.10.
men fhould be good, or all men c- The reprochings, wherein God
uill.t.^.g. fayth to his people that they were
Againft the fame men alfo it is the caufe that they recciued not al
proued that exhortationSjadmoni- kinde of good things at his hande,
tions & rebukin?$ are not in vaine, do not prouc that it was njans po-
alihoughit be not in the power of wer toefcapcthc cuils wherewith
they
'^'^j^T^mw^psm
^^y^ .;?Fi^^.
The Tabic. ■-r-y^i
tney were affllded . And there is pic , but alfo the fubcilc inucntions
fpoken of the vfe of fuch rcpro- of prophane phijofophy , and the
chinges as well toward the chat ob- error of the Manichecs coccrning
fiinately go forward in their faults, two originall beginningcs, and the
as towardc the conformable that falfc opinio of the Anthropomor-
arc conuerted to repentance. Alfo phitcs concerning a bodily God.i.
whereas the Scripture doth fomc- ij.i.
time giue to v$ the office of doing. In what fcnlc it is fayd that Go<I
it doth fo for no other reafon but to is in hcatftrn , & what doctrine is to
awaken the flothfulnes of the flcfh. be gathered thereof. ^.20.40.
1.5. 1 1. Whatis,thenatneofGodtobc
The faying of Mofes,The com- fandificd.g. 10.41.
maundcmenc is ncre to thee.in thy Of the kingdom of God among
mouth & m thy heart. &c. maketh men, & of the encrcaling & fulncs
nothing for the defenders of Free,- thereof, j. 2.42.
wil,forafmuch as he there fpeaketh See Knowledge of God,
not of the bare commaundcments. See Image of God in man.
but of the euangclicall promifes of GoJpeU.
the law. I. f. 1 2. Chrift, although he were kno-
No more do thofe places make we to the lewes in time of the law,
for them , where it is fayd that the was yet (hewed in dcde only by the
Lorde looketh and watchcih to fee Gofpell : & the holy fathers taiUd
ivhat men wil do.2.5. 1 j. of that grace, which is now offered
AJfo thofe places where good to vs with ful aboundancc,thcy fav?
Workes arc called ours , and we arc y day of Chrift^albeit with adimme
fayd to do that which is holy and fight, the glory whereof nowc fhi-
pleafinge to the Lorde. And here neihinthe Gofpell, without any
is {hewed that thconely Spiritcof veilebctwene vsandit.2.5».i,2,
God worketh all good motions in In the fame place alfo is fhewed,
Ts,butyetnotasinftockes.2.5.i4, that the Gofpell is properly and
I $, fpecially called the publifhing of the
An cjfpofition of certaine other grace giuen in Chrift , and not the
places of Scripture, which the enc- promifes that are written by the
mies of the grace of God do abufe. Prophets concerning theremifllo
to ftabIi(hFrcewill.z. J. 16, 17,18,19 offinncs. Againftthedo^nncof
G. Scruettus, which takcth away the
God. promifes vnder this pretence y by
THe Scripture teaching the im- the faith of the Gofpel we haue the
meafurablc and fpirituall fiib- fulfilhngc of all the promifes , it is
ftance of God,doth ouerthrow not proued that though Chnft offer to
only the follici of the comon peo- vs in the Gofpell a prcfent fulncffc
■^%^f--}:.-^m^'' The Table.
of fpirituall good thinges, yet the time the Spirit of the Sonne. He js"
enioyingc thereof lyeth hidden called the Spirit of Chrift,not only
vnder the cuftody of hope fo long in refpe<a that Chrift is the eternal
as we liue in this worldsSc therfore Worde , but alfo accordinge to his
we muft yet reft ypon the promifcs. pcrronofMcdiacor.3,i.2.
^'9'i' An expalicio of the titles whcr-
A confutation of their errour with the Scripture fett eh forth the
which compare the bwe wijth the holy Ghoft:& there is cnvrcated of
Gofpell, none otherwife than the the beginning and whole reftoring
dcferuings of workes with the im- of our faluati6:The titles be thefc:
putationof free righteoufncfTe.i. the Spirite of 3dopt!on,che earncft
^'4' and feale of our inhcriiauncc , life,
lohn the Baptift had an office watcr>oyle, oyntment/Hre, a foun-
meane betwene the prophetes ex- taine, the hande of God.&c. ^.1.5;.
pofitorsofthelaw*,5ndthe Apo- Faithisihc chiefe worke ofthc
ftles publifhcrs of the GorpeJl.z.9. holy Ghoft, and therefore to it for
J. the nioft part f re all thofe thingcs
Gouernment, referred which arc commonly
Sec Politike Gouernmcnt. founde in the Scripture to exprcffc
H. the force & erFcduall power of the
Handes. holy Ghoft. j. 1.4.
Sec laying on of Handf $. HumUity,
Holy water ofVapifles, - It is not the true Humility which
Sec Booke.4. Chapter. lo.SciSion. God requireth of vs, vnlcffe we ac-
ao. knowledge our felucs vtterly voide
Uofy Ghofl. . of al goodnelie and rig;hteoufne(re.
Teftimonies whereby the God- g. 1 2.6.
hed of the holy Ghoft is proued. i Of this humility there is an cx-
13.14,15'. • ample (hewed in the Publicanc. J.
The holy Ghoft is the bonde 12.7.
wherewith Chntt doth efFcdually That we may giue place to the
binde vs to him, and without it, all calling of Chrift>both prefumption
that Chrift hath fuftcred and done & carclefnes muft be farrc away fr5
forthefaluationofmankindcdoth vs. ^.12 8.
nothing profit vs. 5. 1. 1, 3. There is nodaungcrleaft man
Chrift came after a fingular ma- flioulde take too much from him-
ncr furnifticd with the holy Ghoft, i^lic , fo that he !earne that which
to feuere vs fro the world, & ther- wantcth in himfelfe is to be reco-
forc he js called the Spirit of fandi- ucrcd in God. It is a Dcuilifh word,
fication . Why he is fomctime cal- although it be fwete to vs, y lifteth
led the Spirit of the father, &rom- vp man in himfclfc : forrepulfinge
wheicc^,
The Tabic.
whereof, there arc recited out of The glory of God is corrupted
the Scripture many wei;^hty fen- with falfe lying,whcn any forme is
tcnccSjwliichdorigoroufly throwe appointed to it. i.ii.i.
downe ma: & a!fb there arc recited U is proued by tcxtcs& reafons,
ceitame promifes , which do pro- that God generally miflikcto all
mifcgiacc to none but to the (hat Portray tures and Images that arc
do Dine away with fcclingf; of their made to exprcfic a figure of him, &
owncpoucrty.2.2.io. ' . this proHibifio pertained not to the
Ccrtame notable layings of Chri- Icwcs oidy.i. 11.2.
foftomc and Auguflinc concerning God did in oldc time fo fhewc
true Humilicy.2.2.ii. '^ ' his prefencc by vifible fignes either
I. to the whole people, or to certame
Idolf. chofcn men , that the fame fignes
THe Scripture fcttcth out God admoniflicd the of the incomprc-
by cercainetKles of addition & henfiblcfubftanccof God.iTii 5.
markcs, notto theentcntto bindc Itisproutdcucnofluuenals te-
him to one place or to one ptople, ftimony that die Papiftes are mnd,
but to put difference bctwcnc his which defcnde the Inia^esof God
holy Maicfty and Idvls.i.8. 1 5. and of Saindcs with the example
An expofition of the firft com- of the Cherubs coucringe the pro-
maundcment: where is fhcvvcd that piciatoiy.i.11.3.
worfhippinge,truft,inuocation,and The ftuffe it felfe and alfo the
thankefiiiuingc, belonge \vholly to, workcmanlliip which is done with
God , and no whit thereof may be the handcs of men, do fhew that I-
conucicdany otherwhere without mages are not Gods. 1.11.4.
great miury to him to whofc eies al Againft the Grecians,whichmake
things arc opcn.2 8.16. nograue Image ofgod,butdogiuc
An expofition of the fecond CO- thefeluesleaue to paint him. 1.11.4
maundcment: whercislpokenof Thefayinge ofGrcgoryjvppon
Idols and Images.! 8,17. which the Papiftcs fay that they
The Scripture,to y entet to bring ftande , that Images arc vnlearned
vs to the true God , doth cjtprcfly mens booked, is cofuted by the tc-
cxcludc all the gods of the Gen- ftimony of HieromCjHabacucLa-
iiles.i.io.j. & fpccially all idols & dantius, Eurebius,Auguftinc,Var-
Imagcs. I.II.I. ro,and the decree of the Elcbercinc
God is feuered from Idols , not councell.1.11.5 6,7.
only that he alone fhould hauc the The Papiftes Portraitures or I-
name of God,but y he'alone (liold mages whereby they reprefent the
be wholly worfhippcd, & nothinoc holy martirs and godly virgins, arc
y belongeth to the Godhed fliould patcrnes of moft wicked riotoui
bcconucicdtoanyocher.i.ii.i. cxccifcand vnchaftnes. 1.11.7,11.
NNNN
1 he Tabic.
"he peoptf fliail jcarne much holde.i.ii.xi.
more by nhc preaching of the word Of Images in the temples of
;^iid rainiiliratjon of Sacramcntes, Chrittians.4^.9.
than by a thoufand wodde croiTes. Euen the Idolaters themfelues
I.H.7. in all ages, naturally vnderftoodc
The antiquity and beginningc that there is one only God'.but this
of Idobtry, for that men thinkinge vndcrftandinge auailed no further
God not to be neere them, vnlcfle than to make the to be vncxcufable
he did fhewhimrtife. carnally pre- i.io.|. r
(enL',fairedvpfignes in which they Idobtry is an euidct proofe that
beleued that he was carnally con- the knowledge of God is naturally
ucrfsnr before their eyes. 1. 11. 8. planted in the mindes of all men. i
After foch an inuentio byandby 3.1.
foiloweth the worlhipprnge of the Image of God in man.
Image, like as of God or of any o- What it is, that man was create
ther creatiTre in the Image : both after the Image of God: And here
which the law of God forbiddcth. are confuted the fonde expolitions
i.ii.8;9. of Ofianderand ofother:andherc
Againft them>which for defence is declared that though the Image
of abominable Idolatry , do pre- of God do appcare alio in the out-
tende that they do not take the I- ward manne,and do excende to the
mages for Gods, it is proued that whole excellence wherewith the
neither rhe le wes did thinke their nature of man pafleih all kindes of
calfe CO be God , nor the heathen liuinge creatures, yet the principal!
when ihey made to themfelues I- feate thereof is in the minde and in
mages did cucr thinke y fame to be the heart, or in the foule & the po-
GoJ,whoyecnomancxcure.i.n.9. werstherof.i.i^.g.&i.a.i.
The PapifiC^ are fo perfv/aded as The Image of God at the bc-
thc he r.hen and the Idolatrous ginning appeared in Adamjinhght
Icwcs wercjthat they worfhip God of minde, vprightnes of heart, and
himfelf vnder Imagcs.i.ii. to.Nci- the foundnes of all his parts:which
chcr can they e(c«oc away with is proued by the repayring of cor-
their diilinftion of feruice & wor- rupted nature,wherein Chrift ne w-
fliip.i.ii.ii,i6.& i.ii.2. lyfafhioneth vsaftcr the image of
When Idolatry is condemned, God, and by other argumentes. i.
grauinge & painting arenotvttcr- 15.4.
ly rcproucdjbut there is required a Indulgences,
true a^id right vfc of them both. See Vardons.
that God be not counterfsited Infantes.
vt-ith bodily {hapejbut onely thoic See Ba^tijtng vf Infantes,
thinges which our cy^^ may be- Laf Ihdgement,
Of
The Tabic.
Of the vifiblc prefence ofChrift It is Ihcwcd by y Scriptiirc^wbat
when he {hall appeare at the laft it is to be luftified by workcs , and
dlay:Of the ludgemet of the quick what it is to be luftified by faith, j.
&dead,and that our faith is well & ii.i,}j4..
rightfully directed to the thinking A confutation of the crrour of
vpon ihat day : and of the notable 0(iandcr,c6cf rning cflential righ-
comfornng tiiat thereby anfeth in ceoufhcSsWhich taketh fro men the
our confciences. J. 25.7,8. earncii feeling of the true grace of
Ofthe incoprehcnfiblegreuouf- Chrift. j.iJ.5,6,7.&c.tothe ij.
nes of Gods vengeance agamfl the A confutation of Oiianders in-
reprobate, ^.25.1 z. uentiojthatwhereasChnft isboth
ludkUilprocecdinges in Law, God & Man > he was made rightc-
O: the vfe of ludiciall procec- oufnes to vs in rcfpcd of his nature
dinges, Magiftrates, and Lawes, 3- of Godhead ^nd not of his Man-
monge Chriftians. Itis lawfull for hode.g. 11.8,9.
Chriftians to fuc for their right be- Againft them which imagine a
fore a Magiftrate, fo that the fame righteoufncs compounded of faith
be done without hurting of piety & and workes, it is pjoucd that when
ofthe loue of our neighbour.4.20. the one is ftabliihcdjihe other muft
17,18. nedes be ouerthrowen. 3-ii«ij,i4>
DefircofreucngCjisrtlway tobc 15,16,17,18.
auoided, whether it be a commo or It is proued by the Scripture a-
conumciall adion wherein mennc gainlt the Sophifteis, that this is a
ftriue before a Iudge.4.20. 19. lure principle, that we ore luftificd
Thecommaundemer or Chrift, by faith only. g. 11.10,20.
to giuc thy cloketo him rhat taketh It is proued by tclhmonics of
away thy coatc, & fuch like, prcue Scripture that the rightcoufn<fs of
notbut that aChriftiamay fut be- fait.h is reconciliation with God,
fore a Magiftrate,& vfe iiis help for which confilieth only vpon the re*
y preferuing of his goods. 4.20.20. miilionoflinncs.^.i t.21,22.
Paul doth not vtterly condemne By the only jntcrcellioor mcanc
futcs, but icproueth the vnmeafu- ofthe righieoufneire ofChrift, wc
rable rage of fuyng.at lawe among obtaine to be iuthficd before God.
theCorinthians.4.20.21, J.I 1.2 J.
lujiification of Faith, That we may he throughly pcr-
Ofthe luftificatio of faith, &firft fwadedof the free luftilication, wc
of the definition of the name & of muft hft vp our mindcs to y iudge-
thethingitfelfe.5.11. mentfcate of God: before which.
The article of dosfbrine concer- nothinge is acceptable biit y which
ning the luftiGcation of faith IS of is whole and peifed ineuery be-
great importance. 5.1 i.i. halfc>thc drcdful! m.;icfty whereof
NNNN ij
The Tabic.
T$ defcribed by many places of linncs, in which wc fay that rigbtc-
Scripturc.^ii.i,z. ournesconfifteth.5.16.4.
. All godly writers do {bcwc that In what fcnfc the Scriprurc often-
v/hcn me haue 10 do wiih God, the times faith that the faithful are lu-
only place of refuge for confcicncc ftified by workes, 5.17.8^,9,10,11,12,
is in the free mercy of God,exclu- The doets of the lawc are Iiii-
dmgatltrutt of workes: And this is ficd. j.i/.ig.
ptoued by tcibmonies of Auguftme He that walketh in vprightncs,
4ind Bernard. g. 12. 5. is righteous. 5. 17. 15.
Two thinges are to be obfcrued An expofition of certainc places,
in free Juftification : the firft , that wherein the faithful! do boldly of-
the Lord kcpe M\ his glory vnmi- fer their righteoufncs to the iudgc-
nifhed : which is done when he a- mcntof God to be examined, and
lone is acknowledged toberigh- pray to be iudged accordingc to
teous , for they glory againft God the famc.and it is proued that this
which'Joryinthemfelues.g.ij.i,a difagrecth not with the free iuftifi-
thefeconde, that our confciences cation ofFaiih. 5.7. 14.
may haue quietnefle in the fight of The faying of Chrirt,Tfthou wile
his lodgement. J. 1 5. 5,4,5. enter into lifc,kepe the commaun-
Wh.it maner of beginning is of demcmet , dilagreeth not with the
luliification , and what continuall free luftification of faith. 3. 18.9.
proccQjncs.:?.i4. K.
A biiefe fumme ofthc fundatio Kingdom of Chip,,
of C hriftjan doftrme taken out of See Vrieflhoude.
Paul. ^ . i 5 . 5 . Knowledge ofGod,
This fundation being layd,vvife To Knowe God,is not onely to
builders do well & orderly build v- conceiue that there is fome God,
pon, whether it be to fet forth do- but to vnderftande fo much as bc-
drinc & c\'hortauon,or to giue co- houeth vs to knowe of him, and fo
toir.7.15.8. much as auaileth for his glory,and
Good workes are not deftioyed iscxpedienM.2.1.
by the dodrineot lulhfication of The Knowledge of God ought
■ •^.5.16.1. totendetothiscnde,6rft to frame
j..> njoft falfe that mens mindes vs to fearc and reuercncc : & then
'/ii.Twen away from affcdion that by it guiding & teaching vswe
ell doing, when we take from maylcarncto aske all good things
them the opinion of dcfcruinge. j. of him, & to accompt the fame re-
16. i,^. ceiued at his hande. 1.2.2 & 1.5.8,
It IS a moft vainc fclaundcr,that The Philofophers had no other
mfnareprouokedtoiinncjwhen Knowledge of God than y which
we aOimic a free forgiuene£c of made them vncxcufable , but did
not
The Tabic. ^i',<;yf
not brings them to the trueth. z.i. finnes,io mouc vs to feekc for par-
l8. donofourgiltincs.2 7.3.4.
This pcrfwaCo is naturally plan- It is proued by the 5>cripturc &
ted in all men ,that there is Tome dcclarcdjihatthcobferuingofchc
God. i.z. j. fie that to this cndc.that Law is impofliblc.1.7.^.
they which do not worfhip him, There are three vfes and offices
may be condemned by their ownc of the morall Lawe : The hrft is,
iudgement. i . 3. i . that {hewing vnto vs the righteouf-
Though all men know by nature nes which oncly is acceptable vn-
that there is a God , yet fome be- to God,it may be as a gbfle for vs,
come vainc in their fuperftitions, wherin we may behold our wcake-
and other fome of fet purpofe do ne(re,& by it our wickedncs,and fi-
malicioufly depart from God. 1.4. i nally by them both , our accui led-
See certajne things pertaining to this ncffe : Neither turneth this to any
matter jin the Title of Creation of the difhonor of the Lawe, but makcth
vorid. for the glory of the bountifuilnes
L. of God , which both with hclpe of
. Laying on of handes. grace aideth vs to do that which
OF Laying on of hands in ordc- we are commaundcd,and by mercy
ringofMiniilcrs.4 14.20. putteth away our offences. Nei-
Of the Laying on of handes in ther yet doth this office ahogethcr
'making of popifh prieftes.4.19, 5 1. ceaiTe in the reprobate. 2.7.0, 7s8,
Larv, 9.
The Lawjthat is to fay the forme The fecond office,is to rcftraine
of religion kt forth by Mofcs , was the reprobate with fearc of puni(h-
noc giuen to holde the olde people mcnt.Ieaft they vnbridelcdiy com-
ftill in it , but to nouriOie in their mit the wickednelTc which inward"
harts the hope of faluatio in Chrift ly they alway nourifhe and loue:
vntil his comming:which is proued & alfo to drawe backe the children
by tBte that Mofes repeateth the of God before their regeneratiom
metion of the couenat:& by the or- from outwarde licentioufncflc.a./,
dcr of the ceremonies appointed io,ii. ^
as well in facrifices as in walhinges. The third office,conccrncth i'_
alfo by the office of priefthodc in faithfulhfor the Law although it b/
the tribe of Leui,and the honor of already wrytten with the finger of
kingdom in Dauid & his pofterity. God in their heartcs, yet profiteth
The Law alfo of the ten commau- them two wayes : For by ftudyingc
dements was giuen to prepare men vpponit,thcy arc more confirmed
to feeke Chrift. 2.7.1,2. and that is in the vnderllanding of the will of
donc,wh| it maketh vs,vncxcufablc the Lord,& are ftirred vp Si. ftreng-
being on cucry fide coui^ed of our thencd to obedience , that they ep
NNNN iij
Ww The Tabic.
not out of kindc by the (luggifhncs fore for the right and true cxpoun-
ofthcflellie.2 j,iz,i^. For,as tou- dinge ofthem,it behouech to wcy
ching the curfe of the Law, it is la- whac is the emcnt or cndc of euc^
ken away from the faich(uU,that it ry of thcm:Then from that which
can no more extend it felf againft is commaunded or forbidden , wc
them in damning and deftroyingc muft draw an argument to the con-
lhem.2.7.14. trarie, that we may vnderftandc.
By the ten commaundements of that not only an euill is forbidden,
the Law we leai ne the fame things but alfo the good is commaunded
which wc but flenderly taft by in- which i s contrary to that euiil. 2.8,
ftrudion of the law of nature : Firft 8,9.
that we owe to God rcuerece,loue. Why God fpake by way of cm-
& feare,y righceoufncjQTe pleafeih plied comprchcndinge,in fettingc
him,& wickedncs difpleafeth him: foorth the forme of his commaun-
finajlyjthatexamininge our life by dementes.iS.io.
the rule of the LaWjWC arcvnwor- Of the diuidmgoftheLaw into
thy to be accomptcd amonge the two tablcs;and how thercm we are
creatures of God,& that our power taught that the firft fundation and
is vnrufficiet,yea,no power at all to the very foule of righteoufnesis thp
performe y Law. Both thefe pomtcs woi fhipping of God.2.8. 1 1.
cngendre in vs humility & abacing Of thcdiuifion of the ten com-
bfourfeliies, which teacheth vsto m3undements,& how many com-
fiy e to the mcrcie of God , and to maunctmenrs are to be appointed
craue the helpe of his gracc.2.8. i, to the firft tablcand how many to
ij^. the fecond. 2.8. 12,50.
Forafmuch as God the Lawma- An exporicion ofthe commaun-
kcr is fpiriiuall, that is to fay, fpca- dements of God : Where is decla-
kech as weli.to the foule as to the red that the Lord in the beginning
body, therfcre the law likewifc re- ofthe Law,to ftabhdi his own ma-
quirech not only anoiuward hone- iefty, vfeth three argumenWrFirft
ftyjbut alfo an inward and fpiritual by chalenging to himfelfe the fo-
■ hteoufne{re,&averyangclike uerjigne power and right of domi-
^ ;/Cire.2.8.6. which is proued by nion ouer vs , he doth as it were by
"^ /iftts ownc expofition.when he neceftity drawe vs to obey him: fe-
x^nfutcd the Pharifees wrong in- condly he allureth vs with y fwete-
^terpretation, which required only a ncs of the promife of grace:thirdly
ce:taine outward ob(eruati6 ofthe he moueth vs to obcdiece with re-
Law.2.8 7. hearfall ofthe benefit that we haue
Thercisalway moreinthcco- rcceiued.2.8.ij,i4,ij.
maundementes and prohibitions The Law teacheth not only cer-
of the Law^than is cxpreftcd.Ther- tainc introdudions & principles of
rightc*
The Tabic.
righceoufncs , but the very accom- this commaundcmet, although we
phlhment thereof,the cxprelTing of do not Lye. But in this poinc chcrc
the image of God, & the perfeftio muft be a difterence wifely made
of hohncirc:whichlawisalcontai- betwene the flauodhnge which is
ned in two po yntcs , that is to fay, here condcmned,& iudiciall accu-
the loue of God and of our neigh- fation or rcbuking,which is vfcd v-
bour.2.8.5 1. pon defire to bring to amendcmcr.
The Law of Nature.!. 2.22. 2.8.48.
Lawes Volitik^. Life of a Chrljllan man.
Neither can Lawes be without The law containeth a rule how
the Magiftrate, nor the Magiftrate to frame a mans Life , and diuerfc
without Lawes . A confutation of places alfo of the Scripture do here
them which fay that a common and there declare it, & not without
wealc is not well orderedjvnlefle it an orderly mancr of tcachingc , al-
,be goucrned by the politike Lawes though not fo exquifite & curious
of Mofes. For this purpofeis re- as thePhilofophcrsdo.^^^.i.
hearfcd a diuifion of the Lawes of Herein the Scripture doth two
Mofes mto morall Lawes , cere- things:itftirreth vs vp to the loue of
monies,& iudiciall Lawes, and the righteoufneffe and tcacheth a rule
cnde of cuery one of them beingc how to foUowc the fame. The firtt
difcufled,tt is proucd y it is lawefuU point it worketh by diuerfe argu-
for euery feuerall nation to make mets & reafons. 3.6.2.& herein the
politike LawcS)4.2o.i4,ij.fo that Scripture laycth much better fuii-
ihey agree with that natural equity, dations,tha can be found in all the
the reali>n whereof is fet foorth in bookes of the Philofophers. j.6. j.
the moral Law ofMofes.Therfore Againft them that prctcndc a
it is (hewed by examples that they knowledge of Chrift,whc their life
m ay alter the 01 dinanccs of penal- and manners refemble not the do-
tiesaccordingero the diuerlityof ci:rincofChrift.5,6.4.
the cuntrie, time> & other circum- Though perfcdion were to be
ftances.4. 20, 1 6. wiilicd in all men, yet we muft alfo
Liberty, acknowledge for chj iftias the moft
See Chriflian Liberty, parte of menne which haue not ycf
Lying. proceded fo farre. We muft *1 way
An expofiiion of the ninth com- endeuour forwarde, & not defpeirc
maundement: wherin the Lord for- for y fmalnes of our profiting.3.^. 5
biddeth fahhed , wherewith we by Ofit of a place of Paul thefc arc
Lying or backebyiing, do hurt any gathered to be y parts of a wcl fra-
mans good name,or hinder his co- med Life;confiderati6 of the grace
modity.2.8 47. of God, forfaking of wickednelTe &
VVc many times finne againft of worldly luttcs, fobcrncs, rightc-
NNNN iiij
The Tabic.
ouihcSjgodlincfle (which fignifieih Icncy of the eternal felicity (which
true holmes) & the blefled hope of is the end ofthc rcfurredion ) the
inimortahyir.g .7. g. taft of the fwectenefTc whereof wc
Life pre fcnt^ ^the helves tjhereof. ought here continually to take, but
The bciipture tevuhtth the heft yei toauoidcuriofity wherupondo
way howe to vfc the goodes of this arife trifling & noylbme queftions,
Lifc.5.10 4,5. yea and hurtful! fpeculations. And
Two faulces muft be auoided: there (hall be ancgall mcafureof
that we do neither binde our con- glory to all the children of God in
Icienceswiih too much tigorouf- hcauen. j. ij. 10, 11. In which
neSjnor giue loofc rcines to the in- place alfb \s an anfwere to the que-
temperance of men. 5. 10. 1,5. ftions which fome men do mouc
. God both in clothini^ & in foodc conccrninge the ftatc of the chilr
prouided not onely for our neccfli- dren of God after the refurredion.
ty,but alio for our delite.g. 10.2. In what fcnfe ctcrnall Life is
Itismotbjecelfaric, thatcuery fomtime called y reward of wotkes. ^
one of v$ in all the doings of his life g. 18. 1,4. *
do loke vpon his vocation , that wc M.
attempt nothing e railiely or with Magifhratet.
doutfuU confciencc.3.10.6. 'TpHc office of Magiftratcs is not
Goddifdaineth not to prouidc • A only holy and lawefuH before
alfofor the neceflities of our earth God, butalfo the moft holy and
ly body>& in what fenic we askc of honorable degree in all the life of
him our daily bread, g. 20.44. mert, and this is proucd by diuerfe
Life to come. titles wherwith the Scriptqf'e doth
God doth by diuerfe myfterics fet it forth, and by the example's of '
teach vs the contempt of this pre- holy men, which haue borne ciuile
fcni Life, that we may earncdly de- power. 4. 20,4.
fire Life to come. 5.9. 1 ,2,4. This confideration is a pricke to
Sucha corempt of this Life is re- godly Magiitrates to moue them to
quired of vs, that we neither hate it the doing of their ducty.and alio it
nor be vnthankefull to God , of isacoforttoeafe thehardtrauailes
whofeclemencyit isateftimony to of their office.4. 20.6.
the faithfull.;.^. 5. A confutation of the, which fay
An admonition to them which that though in the oldc time vndcr
are holdcn with too much fcare of the law Kinges and ludges ruled '
dcath,y Chnftians ouj^ht rather to ouf r Gods people , yet this feruile
' iJefire that A^y v/hich ihal make an kind of goucrnmetdorh not agree
end of their colitinuallmiferies,and with the perfedion which Chrift
fill them with true ioy. ^-9. 5,6. hath brought with his gofpcI.4.ao.
Of ihe incomprehcnliblc excel- h7'
They
The Tabic. --t^™r.
They crtc which occlude the and which rule tyrannOTfly ^for-
Mngiftratcs from the charge of re- fomuch as pcrteineth to pubhkc
ligion,rorarmiJch as their office ex- obedience) ought to be had in as
tcndeth to both the tables of the great rcuerence and honor as wc
lawe : It is proued by Scripture, would geueto the beft king that
that they arc ordcined protcdors might be,4.20,24,2^.bccaufe euen
6c defenders as well of the worfhi p* they alfo haue the pubhkc power
pin^ofGodas of common peace not without the prouidence and
and honefty, which they cannot fingular power of God. Which is
thorowly performe without the proued by diuerfe teftimonies and
power of the fwcard.4,2,0.9. examples of Scriptureiand there is
A declaration of this queftion {hewed with what confidcrations
by Scripture, howe the magiftrats thofc fubieds ought to bridle their
may be godly,and aifo drawe their ownc inpatiencc which liue vnder
fweardc, & {hcd the blood of men, fuch vngodly* and wicked tyrants,
and iris proued that they arc fo 4.20.26,27,28,29,51.
farre from (inning in punilliing of- It is not lawfull for priuate men
fenders,ih3t this is one of the ver- to rife vp againft tyranccs,but only
tucsofaKing, andaprofe of their for them which by thelawcsofthe
godlinefle. Herein the M^giftratcs kingedome or of the coutry,are the
muft beware of two faiiltes,n3me!y defenders of the liberty of the peo-
extreme rigoroufneflfe , and fuper- plc,4.20.:{ 1.
fiitiousdcfireofpitie.4.20. 10. The Lordc by his maruelloiw
Itistheduty of fubicdes toward goodnelTe and prouidence, doth
Magiftraics , to thinkc honorably fometime raife vp fome of his fer-
oithcm asof chcminiftersandde- uances topaniflie tyrauntes , and
pucies of God , forfomuch as con- fometime alfo he diredeth therc-
cerneth their degree , but not that unto the rage of wicked men while
ihey iliould eftceme the vices of they intende an other thing. 4.
men for venues. 4.20. 22. 20.50.
It is alfo their duty with mindes In the obedience which is due
hartily bente to the honoringe of to thecommaundementsof kings
them to declare their obedience and rulers this is alway to be cx-
towarde them , whether it be in cepred,that it drawe vs not away
following their decrecs,or in paying fro the obedience of God:Neithct
of tributes, &c. to pray to God for is any wrong done 10 them when
their fafety and profperity , to raife we rcfufc to obey them in fuchc
no tumuUes & not to thruft them- things as they commaunde againft
(clues into the office of the Ma- God:And this is our duiy,howe
g«ll:ratc.4.20.2j. gr^^t ^n*l prefent perill foeuerdo
Euen wicked princes of cuell life, hangc vpon fuch coftancy.4.20. jx.
The Tabic.'
Maru to y bookes of Philofophers, which
Man is by knowledge of him- while they withholdevs inconfi*
fclfcnotonly mouedtofekcjGod, dering onely our good thingcs,
but alfo led as ic were by the hande would carry vs away into a moil
tofindehim.i.i.i. wicked ignorauncc of our felues.
The creatioof Man is a notable 2.i.i,2,j.
(hcwe of the power,wiredome5and Man can neuer come to the trewc
goodneffe of God:wherefore Man knowledge of himfelFe , vnlelfehc
is by feme of the Philofophers hauefirftbeholdethefaceofGod,
called a little world. 1.^.3. that is to fay , till he haue begonnc
The vnthankefulneffe of Men, to knowe and weigh by the wordc
which feeling tokens of the proui- of God , what and hov/e exade is
dence of God both in their foule theperfedion of hisrighteoufncs,
and body, yet do not geue God wifdome and power, to the which
praife. 1. 5.4. we ought to be m^ide of like forme.
Two fortes of knowledge of our i. i.x.
ielucs I'the one in our firft originall Euen the niofi: holy men were
cftatc , the other after Adams fall, ftricken with feare and ailoniflimet,
and the latter is not to be recciued whe God did extraordinarily fhewc
without confideringe the firfl:,lcaft his prefcnce and glory vmo them.
we fhoulde feeme to impute cor- 1.1.5.
ruption to God the author of na- That whole man is corrupted in
ture.i.15.1. both partes of him, (that is to fay
The knowledge of himlelfe is both in vnderftanding minde , and
moft neceflary for Man, which c6- in harte or will) is proued by di-
fiftcth in this, (as the truth of God uerfe titles wherewith the Scrip-
prefcribeth ) that firft confideringe turc defcribeth him, fpccially when
10 what ende he is created,and en- it fayeth that he is fl^e: And there
dued with cxcell^t giftes, he fliould is declared that this word flefhe is
hang altogether vpon God , of not referred onely to the lenfuall
whom he hath all thinges by gift: parte but alfo to the fuperior parte
then, that weyinge his owne mi- of the foule. 2. 5.1.
fcrable eftate after the fall of Ada, That Men do in vainc feke for
hcc {hould trewely loth himfclfc any good thing in their owne na-
and concciue a newc defire to feke ture, is proued by Paule, which en-
God , that in him he may rccouer treating of the vniuerfal kindred
ihefc good thinges , of which he of the children of Adam , and not
himfelfc is found vtterly voidc and rebuking the corrupted maners of
cmpcy.Wherefore we muft beware fomc one age alone,but accufingc
that in this pointe we hearken not the pcrpetuall corruptio of nature,
to the iudgement of the flefhe and takcth from men righteoufneife,
thai
The Tabic.
that is CO fay vprightnefle, & pure- comaundemcnt, wherein the Lo7i
neflcjand then vnderftandmg , and forbiddeth fornication, and requi-
lattof allthcfeareof God.i.j.z. rethchaftity and clcannefle,which
A confutation of the obiedion wee ought to kepe and prefcruc
concerning certaine heathen Men, both in our minde,and in our eyes,
which forafmuch as they were all and in the apparrell of our body,
their life long by the guiding of and in our tonge,and inthemo-
nacure bent to y endeuor of vcrtuc derate vfe of mcatc and drinkc. 2.
and honcfty, do fcemc to warne vs, 8.41,44.
that we (liould not efteemc the na- Continence is a fingular gifte of
tuie of Man altogether corrupt. God, which he gcuerh not to all
Therefore it is declared that in the men,but to fome,yea & that fome-
vnbeleuers God doth not inward- time for a feafon : As for them to
ly ricnfe the corruption of naturci whom it is not grauntcd , let them
whervvith Man is in echc parte de- alway flee to Mariage, which is or-
filed, (as hee doth in the ele<ft) but deined of the Lord for the remedy
by his piouidencc fometime hee of mans necefluy. 1.8. 41. 42,45.
bndleth it in them , that it breakc Maried perfons muft beware that
not forth into deedcs , and rcftrai- they committe nothing vnbcft-
ncrh it by diucrfe wayes , fo much min^ the honcfty and temperance
as he knoweth to be expedient for of Mariage : Otherwife they feemc
prcl'eruing of the vniuerfall ftateof ro be adulterers of their own wiues,
things.2. J.J. and not hufbandes. 1.8.44,
Thofe vertues which wee rcadc The pjpiftes do wrongfully call
tohauebene in heathen Men, are Mariage a Sacrament: And their
notfufficietprouesofihepurcntlTe rcalons arc confuted. 4. 19. 54 It
ofnature, forafmuch as their mind isprouedthat the place of Paule,
was inwardly not vpright , being wherwith they feeke to cloke them-
corrupted with ambition or fomc fclues >maketh nothing for them,
other poifon, and not dir&cicd with 4.19,5^.
dclire to fet forth the glory of God: In the meane they difagrec with
and alfo forafmuch as thofe ver- thcfelues when they exclude priefts
tues are not the common giftes of from this Sacrament , and do fay
nature, but the fpcciall graces of that it is vncleanne0'e and defiling
God, which he diucifly and«»by a oftheflc{he.4. 19,^6.
certaine mcafurc gcueth to profane By this falfe colour of Sacramer.
Men, as oftentimes to kings, and the Pope with his cleargy haue
fometimetopriuare Mcn.2.3.4. dravven to ihemfelues the hearing
Sjge Image of God in Man, of c aufes of Matrimony , and hauc
Manage. made lawes of Manage , which
An expo(icion of the fcuench partly are manifeHly wicked agaioft
:^N^ V ^' The Tabic.
Go J, & parrely mod vniuft toward which he boildeth on , that man
meir, which lawcs arc rchcarfed, was create after the ymage of God,
4.1^.37. bccaufe he was formed after the
Mediator Chrifl. hkenefTe of Chrift to comc,that hq
It behoued that Chrift, to the migbt refcmblc him whom the Fa-
ende that he might pcrformc the ther bad already decreed to cloth
office of Mediator,{hould be made with flefli: And rhtfre is Ihcwcd that
man, forafmuch as God had fo or- the ymage of Goii in Adam , was
deined ,bycaurc it was beft for vs, the marks of cxccllecic wherewith
fith none other could be the meanc God had garniflied him , which
for rcftoring of peace betweenc doth alfo Ihinc in the Angels. 2.
God and vs, none other coulde 11.6,7.
make vs the children of God.nonc A folution of other obieftios or
other could affurc vnto vs y inhe- abfurdities which the fame Oliadcr
ritauncc of the hcauely kingdome, feareih : namely , that then Chrift
none other could for remedy fet was borne &creat after they mage
mannes obedience againft mannes of Adam but as it were by chaunce:
<iifobedicnce.i.ii.i,2,^. and that the Angels (hould haue
A confutation of their fantaftical lacked their bed , and men rtioul4
conceit , which affiimc ^hat Chrift haue lacked Chrift their kinge. z»
(hould haue become man,although 11.6^7,
there had needed no remedy for Howe the two natures do make
the redeming of mankindc. And it one perfon of y Mediator in Chrift:
is proued by many rcafons and Which is Ihewcd by a fimilitudc ta^
textes,that forafmuch as the whole ken of the ioining of the foule an4
Scripture cricth out that he was body in one man : And then it is
clothed with flc(h,to the cnde that proued by diuerfe places that the
he might be the redcmer,therefore fcripture doth many times gcuc
it is ;o great ralhneffe to ymagine vnto Chrift thofe thinges which
any other caufe or purpofe.i. 1 1.4. properly belonge|h to the godhed.
Neither is it lawfull to fearchc & fomtime thofe things which muft
further concerning Chrift :& thofe be referred onely to the manhodc,
that do rearchfurther,do with wic- and fometime geucth to the one
ked boldnefTc runne foiwarde to nature that which is proper to the
the faining of a ne we Chrift 5 And othef : which fii^uratiue mnner of
herein Ofiader is reproued, which fpeache is called Communicating
hath at this time renued this que- of ptopertics, 2.14. i,j. and fomc-
ftion, and affirmeth that this error time alfo gcueth to Chrift thofe
is confuted by no teftiihonic of things which do comprched both
Scripiure.2.i2.^. natures together , but do feuerally
And the principle is oucrihrowe well agree with neither of them,
Wh;ch
fe
'*•
The Tabic.
Which laft point the moft part of coccrning the pcrfon of the lonM
the oldc writers haue not fufficict- of God: And thcrupon is gathered
ly maiked : Yvt it is good to be no- that with the crafty darke futtcltics
ted , for the diiToluing of many ofthatfilthy dog,thehopcof fal-
dourcs , and for auoidinge of the uatio is vitcrly cxtinguifhed. 1.14.8,
errors of Neftorius and Eutichcs. Merit ofchrift.
1.14. j;4. It is truely & properly fayd that
A confutation of the error of Chrift Merited for vs the grace of
Seructtus , which had put in the God andfaluat)6;Whcreitispro-
ftcde of y fonne God, an imagined ued that Chrift was not onely the
thing made of the Tubftacc of God, inftrument or minifter of faluation*
fpirit , Befhe , and thi cc clementes but alfo the author and principall
vncreate : His futteltic is difclofcd, doer thereof: And in Co faying,the
and there is proued ( which thing grace of God is not defaced , bc-
he dcnieth ) that Chrift was the caufe the Merit of Chrift is not fet
fonne of God, eucn before that he againftmercy,but hangeth vpon it.
was borne in theflefli, becaufehc And thofe things which are Subal-
is that word begotten of the father terna,fight not as contraries.a.i7.i.
before all woildes. 1.14. 5. The diftindtion of tiie Meritof
Ahb it is proued that he is truely Chrift and of the grace of God i$
and properly the fonne of God in proued by many places of Scrip*
flefh, that is to (ay in the nature of ture.2.i7.z. ^
Man, but yet in refped of his god- There arc alleged many tcfti-
bed, and not of his flcfti, as Seruet- monies of Scripture, out of which
tus babbleth.2. 14.6, it is certainly & foundly gathered.
An cxpofition of ccrtainc placet y Chrift by hisobedicce hath truely
which Seiueitus and his difciples purchaccd and deferued fauor for
do enforce for defence of their vs with his farher.2. 17.^,4,^.
error : There is alfo another cauil- It is a foolillie curiofitie to en-
lation of his difdofed , that Chrift quire,whether Chrift hath deferued
before that he appeared in the any thing for himfelfc: and it is
flellijis in no place called the fonne rafhenefle to affirmc it.2. 17 6,
of Godbutvnderafigure. 2.14.7. Meritesof Workts,
\ Alfo there is opened the error The boftinges that are made of
of .all them which do not acknow- the Merites of workes , do oucr-
ledge Chrift the fonne of God but throwe as well the praife of God
in the flefli : And there are brefcly in geuingrighteourncire,as alfo the
reheaifed y groffe futtelties of Ser- certainty of faluation.^.if.
ucttus , wherewith he hath bewit- Whofoeuer firft applied the* n^rae
chcd himfclfe and other,ouerthro- of Merit to good works in the (ighc
Wingy which pure faith bclcuech ofGodsiud^cmentihedidagainft
-m:^ The Tabic.'
tlie ptifencffc of faith. And though The chicfe partes of the oflBce of
the olde fathers vfcd that nainc,yct ApofHes and paftors arc to preache
they fo vfcd ic that they hauc in the Gofpell, and Minifc the Sa-
many places Ihewed that they at- cromtr.ts./^.^.6,
tribute nothing to workes. J. 15. z. Paftors arc fo bounde to their
An expofiuon of certame pla- Chuichcs,that they may not rc-
ccs , wherewith the Sophiftcrs go moue to any other place without
about to proue that the name of pubhkeauthoritie.4.5.7.
Merit toward God is found in the They are called in the Scripture,
Scripture. 3. 15.4. BifhopSjPriefts, Paftors and Mini-
It is proaed by auihoritie of the ttcrs, which gouerne Churches. 4.
Apoftles and Auguttine,that the 5.8,
rewardes of righteoufues do hang No man ought to thruftin him-
vponthc mere liberahtieof God. felfe in the Ciiuich to teache or
a.5.2. gouerne:But there is a caiUnge re-
It is proued that this is a falfe cjuircd.4.5.10.
faying , that Chrift Merited for v$ The preaching of the worde of
onely the firtt grace, and that after- God is compared to fcede which is
warde \vc do Merit by our owne fcattercdinthcgrounde:Whercby
workes. 3.1 5.6,7. we vnderftand that the whole cn-
There be cenaine things touching creafc proccdeth of the blefling of
merites in the title of lufiification God and thceffcduall working of
fy faith. theholyGhoft.4.14. II.
Minifievy of the Church. What maner of men ought to be
Of the Miniftery of the Church, chofen Bi{hops,andin whath forte
and of them which dcfpife this ma- a.nd of whom they arc to be chofen,
ncr of learning. 4. 1.5. and with what forme or ceremony
Of the cfficacie of the Miniftc- they are to be ordred. 4. j. 1 1, li,
ry.4,1.6. 1^,14.15,16.
God, which might teache the The oldc Church before the pa-
Church either himfclfe alone or pacy, diuided all their Mmifters
by Angels, yec doth it by the Mtni- inro three degrecs,Paftors,Eldcrs,
ftery ofMenforthrce C3ufcs.4.j.T. and Deacons.4.4.1.
The Miniftery of the Church is Of the commillion to remit and
garnifhed wiih many notable titles retaine finnes, or to binde & loofc,
ofcommcndation in the Scripture, which is a parte of the power of
4.3. z, J. the kcycs, and pcrtcineth to the
Ot Apoftles, Pi ophetes, Euan- Miniftery of the word.4.11.1.
geliftcs,Paftors and Teachers : and Monkery,
what is the feucrall office of cucry Monafteries in olde time were
«fthem.4.5.4,5. the fwedcplottcs of cccicfiafticall
orders:
The Tabic. ^ 'T^i^^SSf^
orders :And there is dcfcribed out Of Mortipcauon,
of Auguft jnc the forme of the olde See Torfak^ng of ottrfelues.
Monkery, & howe they were wont O.
at that time to get their liuing with Obedience of children tofarentes,
the labor of their handes. Wherby A N expofition of the fifith com-
appeareth that at this day the ma- xVmaundemcnt : The cnde and
ner of popifhe Monkery is farrc o- fumme thereof. 2.8. gj.
therwife.4.t5. 8,9,10. Howe farrc this word honoring
Of the proude title of perfe<Sio cxtedeth.-and there be three partes
wherewith the Monkes do fctout thercofjReuerece, Obedience, and
their kinde of hfe.4.15.11. bycaufc Thankefulneire.2.8.56.
they binde themfelucs to keepc the Of the promife adioincd to the
counccls of the Gofpell (as they fifith commaundementjConccrning
call them) whcreunto other Chri- long continuance of life.and howe
fiian men arc not bounde. ScfX. iz. farrc the fame pertaineth to vs ac
and becaufe they haue forfaken all this day.1.8.^7.
their pofleffions.Sed. i g. How & by howe diucrfc mcanes.
As many as go into Monafteries, God flievveth his vengeance vpon
do departe from the Church , fith the difobedient : Yet obedience 1%
they openly affirme that their Mo- notduetoparcntes and other, but
kerie is a forme of fecod Baptifme. fauing the lawe of God. 2.8. 38.
4.1^.14. Offences,
The popifli Mokes do in miners What Offences arc to be auoided,
much differ from the olde Monkes. and what to be ncglcded : what is
4.1^.2^. an Offence geuen,and what an of-
Somc things are to be miflikcd fence taken. 3.19. 11.
cuen in the profeffion of the olde It is declared by the dodrinc &
Monkery , and they that were the example of Paule who be wcake,
authors therof brought a perilous to whom wee mufl beware that wee
example into the Church.4. 1 ^.16. geuenooffence.5.19. 12.
Monkes with their vowes do co- Whereas we arc comaunded to
fecrate themfelues not to God but beware that wee Offcnde not the
tothe Dcuell.4.15.17. weake,thcrame is meant onelyia
As all vowes vnlawefull and not things indifferent ; Therefore they
rightly made , are of no value be- do wrongfully abufe this dodrine
fore God , fo they ought to be which fay that they heare mafTe for
voidetovs.4.13.20. the vvcakesn*ke.^.i9.i3.
Therefore they which departe Officials,
fro Monkery to fome honcfte trade Of popifhe Bi/hops Officials , is
of hfe , are wrongfully accufed of they call them. 4. 11.7,8.
faith brcakmg and pcnuiy.4.i j.21. Orden VapfiicxU.
^^i^^m^w The Table.
The Sacrament of Order bre- ccremonic.tlicy do wrogfuUy cou-
dcth to the papiftcs feucn other tcrfait Chrift ; Where is declared
petie Sacraments 5 of whofc names that the Lorde did many chingcs
and differences they thcmfelucs be which he woulde not haue to be
not yet agreed. 4. 19.12. examples for vs to fojlowc.4. 19 z^.
Their fonde and vngodly fo- Ofthc vndclible charaderor vn-
lifhnefie , forafmuch as they make defaceablemarke of y oile whcre-
Chrift felowc Officer with them in with popiflie Pi lefts are anointed
cucty one of them.4. 19 23. atthorcreai-.o.Andhoweihefame
Of Acoluthes, Dorekepcrs and is vvr5gful}y apphed to the childre
Rcdcrs,whom the papiftes do make of Aaron. But thefe Priefts in couc-
Orders of the Church and Sacra- ting to be hke the Leuites,are apo-
ments,4,i9.24,and with what cere- ttaics from Chrift^.iy.jo,^ r.
monies they confecratc thcm.Sed. OriginaU Jinnc.
17. A definition and expounding of
Of Exorciftes or Coniurcrs an Origin3illinne.4.u. 10,1 1,12.
ordcrofthepopifhchurch.4.19.24. A true definition of OriginaU
The orders of Pfalmiftes,Dore- and a declarntion of the fame dcfi-
kecpeis and Acoluthes, arcvaine niiion.Whcreinisfhcwcd.thatnot
names among the papiftes , for- only puniftimcnt came from Adam
afmuch as they thcmfelucs do not vpon vs , but alfo that the infcdion
execute the OfficeSjbutfome boy, dcftillcd from him rcmaincth in v$,
or any laim3n.4. 19. 24. and howe it is the finnc of an other
Of the fhauing of the Clcrgie, and alfo oure ownc Grwic : Finally
and the fignificstJon thereof by the that fuch infedio pearced not only
dodrineof the Papiftes.4.19.25. into the inferior defire, but alfo
They do wrongfully apply it to into the very vndcrftanding mindc
Paules example , which (hsued his and bottomc of the heart , fo thiC
head when he tokc a vowc , or to there is no part of the foulcfrcc
the oldc.Nazariies.4.F 9.26. from corr uptioih 2. 1.8,9.
It is fliewcd out of Auguftine A confutation ofthcm that dare
whence it firft began.4, 19.27. charge God with their faultes, by-
Of the three hier orders : and caufe we fay that men are naturally
firft of Priefthode or facrificcrftiip: faulty : And there is proucd , that
where is (hewed that the papiftes man is corrupt by naturall viciouf-
haucmoft wickt'dly peruerted the nefl"c: (to the^endc that no man
order sppomtcd by God , and do fliould think it to be gotten by euill
wrong to Chrift the only & eternal cuftome) but yet fuch as procedcd
facri'icingprieft.4. 19.28. notfromnaturCjbutisanaccideiall
Of rheir blowing at the making c}ualitie,and not a fubftanciall pro-
of popifli Priefts , and howe in that pertie from the bcginning.2.i.io,iT.
Otht.
The Tabic. ^^IP-^*
Othe. faithfull by y f eling of naturc,which
See Swearing. feling c^n not be clcanc done a-
P. way, and by the aftcdion of godli-
VaiUnce. ncllc wherewith that fame feling
Apart of the fcrf^king of our muftbe fubducd & tamed. 5 8.10.
clues, in refpcd of God, is c6- 1 here is great difTcrccc bctwenc
tcntationofmir.de and fuffernnce : Philofophicall and Chriftian pa-
Which wc fhal] pcrforme, if in fe- ticncc : Forafmuch as the Philofo-
king the commoditie or cjuietncfle phcrs do tcache vs to obey becstsfe
of tl^is prcicnc life we ycldc our wefomuftof nectlliiie; butChiift
feluc* wholly to the Lorde , and do tcachcth ir, becaufe it is righteous,
not delirchopc for,or ihinke vpon and alfo bycaufc it is prtfitable for
any other mcznc of profperingc vs.j.8.u.
than by his blcfTing.^ 7 8. Tardcns,
ho Hiall it come to pafic that wc The fo long cocinumg of Pardos,
{hall ncucr feke our owne commo declarcth in howe dcpc daikencHe
dicics by vnlav.'full mcancs or with of errors men hauc bene drowned
wronging of our ncyghbourj: alio thefc certainc ages paft.?. 5.1.
that we Ihall not burne with vn- What Pardons are by the pa-
mcafurabledciire of richcflcor of piftes dodtrine:Whciby isproued
honors : Hncilly if things piofj^cr that they arc adifnonoring of the
*vc]l with v$,vve fliall yet be holdcn bloud of Chrift : A comparifon of
from pride , and if they lisppenill, Chrift and popilliPurdons.j.j.i.
wcfhallycibcrcftraincd from im- A cofutationof the wicked do-
paticnce, ^,7. 9. Which extendtth <5irinc of Pardons , by the notabU
to a!I chaunccs vvhercunto our pre- fayinges of Leo bifliop of Romc,ik
fent life is fubied , whereof the of Auguftine. And there is fhewtd
faiihfull do alwaycs acknowledge that the bloud of martirs is not vn-
thc hande of God their father,and lawful! , ahhough it haue no place
not fortune, to be the gouernor. in forgeueneflVof finncs.j.5.3,4.
J. 7. 10. Either t.he GofpcU of God muH
The Patience of the faithfull is ly,or Pardos muft be lieng dec^cite*.
not fuch as is without all fcchng of And there is Hiewcd what feemeth
forowc,but fuch as being vphoiden to hauc bin the beginning of them.
by Godly comfort, fighteth apainlt 3.5.5.
the naturall felmg^of forow. Thcr- Tenaunce,the VopJfh Sacrament.
fore the Patience of the Stoikes is Of the vfage of the olde Church
lo be reiedcd:ncithcr is it in it felfc in publikc Pcnaunce : and of the
any fault to wcpe or feare. 5.8.8,9. hying on of handcs at reconciha-
A defcription of y ftriuing which tion. Alfo howc in proceffe of time
is engcndrcd in the haiccs of the the laying cd of handcs was fkdin
0000
'■'"'^^ The Tabic.
priuatc abrolutionr.4.19.14. kinde,and no fmallhclpc to the
The diuer(e opinios of y Scholc- defence of the ftate of religion. Po-
men howc Penaimce is a Sacra- litikegoucrnmec hath three partes,
ment: And there is fhewed chat the the Magiftrat, the Lawes , and the
definition of a Sacrament doth not people.4.20. g.
ai^rec with it.4.ii?, 1^,16. Of three formes of Ciuilc go-
Ic is a ly , and a deceitfull error uernmer, Ariftocracie the gouern-
which they hauc inuenced concer- ment of the beft chofen men , De-
ning the Sacrament of Penaunce: mocracie the gouernement of the
and it is a wicked and blafphemous people , Monarchic the gouernc-
tirlcwherwiththeyhauegarniilied mem of one:it can not Hm ply be
it,a fecond boorde after fhipwrackc determined which of thefc is the
from Baptifmc.4.19.17. beft:yct it commeth to paffe by the
Verfeueraunce. fault of men,that it is fafer & more
iSee Booke.i.Chap.^.Sed'j. collerable to hauc many to gouerne
Aconfutanonofthemoftwicked than one to rcignerButall thefc
error, that Perfeueraunce is gcucn formes are of God,and diuerfly dif-
of God accordmg to the Merit of pofed by him,therefore it is y duty
men , fo as euery man hath (hewed of priuate men to obey, and not to
himfclfc not vnthankfuil for the make innouatio of ftates after their
firft grace: and in this opinion is ownc W1IK4.20.8.
ihcvved a double error. Of the c6- Of the immunitie that the Ro*
mori diflindion of grace workmg, mifhc clergy take to themfelues,
and working together : and howe which was altogether vnknowcn to
Auguftmc vfcd it,qualifymg it with to the Biihops of the olde Church,
anaptdefimtion.i.^.ii. 4.11,15.
VoUuk^e gouernement. In matters of Faith , the iudgc-
There is a diffeic-cc to be made ment in the olde time pertcincd
betwene Policie , and the inwardc to the Church,and not to Princes,
gouernement of the foule. Their although fometime Princes enter-
dodnneistobe reicdcd which go medled their aQthoritie in ecdc-
about to ouerthrowe Policie as a (lafticall matters , but the fame was
thing not necclfary for Chriftians, done to preferuc & not to trouble
or as i thing chat ouerthroweih the order of the Church,4.n.ijji6,
the fpiriruall hbertic of the foule. Of the authoritie of the fweard
Alfo thofe flatterers are to be rcic- vfurped by the biihops in the papa-
ftcd, which do geue to much vnto cic: and howe rhey haueby htle &
it,and do fet it m coparifon againfl litle fro fo fmall beginnings growc
the authoritie of God.4. 20. 1,2. to fo great cncreafe.4,ii.5>,io.
Policie is the gifte of God, which , Vofe.
bnngeth great comodities co inan> It is proucd thai the fuprcmicy
of
The Tabic. ^*^''
of the fee of Rome is not by the Church , that it is falfc which the
inftituticnofChrift.46. 1,2,^,4. bilhop of Rome boileth, that he
Neither had Peter any princi- hathiunftlidioouer all Churches,
palicic mibc Church or among the 4.7.5. Whether ye confidcrtheor-
Apoftles. 4. 6.5,6,7. dcring ofBilhops , Scd.6.or ecclc-
N cither js It profitable nor may fiafticall admonitios andccnfures,
be , th^t one man Ihonld beare rule Scd.7.or fummoning of Councels,
ouer the whole Church. 4.6. 8,5?, to. Scd.8. or authoritieof higher ap«
•: AltliouuhPctcr had had a fjpre- penlcs.Scd.y.io.
micy in the Church, yet it folio- The oldeBifliopsof Romeinthe
wcth not that the feat of that fu- moft part of their EpHiles did am-
premicie ought to be at Rome. 4. bitioufly fet fout th y glory of their
6. 1 1, 1 X, 1 5. fee , but thofe Bpiftles at that time
It is proued by many arguments hadnociedirerAlfo thcydidthruft
that Peter was not biihop of Rome, iii certaine forged tilings as though
4.6.14,15. they had bene written intheoldc
The fupremicie ofthefeeof lime by holy men.4.7. 11,20.
Rome, is not according r.o the vfc Although in the timeof Gre-
of theoldc Church.4 6. 16,17. gory the authoritieof thebifhop
Of the beginning and encrea- of Rome vs greatly encrcafed.yet ic
(inges of the Romifh papacif ,vncill is proued by his writings that it was
it adu3ucedit felfeto tbacheighth, then farre from vnbridlcd domi-
whereby both the libertie of the nionandtyranny.4 7.12,15,22. . ■
Church is oppreflcd ,and all mo- There was ftrife for the fuprc-
derate gouernemcnt hath bene macy betwene the biihop of Con-
oucrthrowen.4.7. ftatinople and the biihop of Rome.
In themofl parte ofthe coucels, 4 7.14,1^,16. vntillPhocas graun-
the Bifhop of Rome nor his legates ted to Boniface y ihirdc, that Rome
had not the chiefe place, but iome fliould be the head of all Chur-
other ofthebilhops had it at the ches:vvhich afterwarde Pipinc c6-
Councell of Chalcedon : but yet firmed,when bee gauc to rhe fee of
without ordcr.4 7-1,2. Rome iurifdidion oucr theChur-
Of the tiile of fupremicie and ches of Fr3uncc.4.7. 17.
other titles of pride wherewith the From thenceforth the tyranny
Popebofteth himfelferand when of thefeeofRomeencreafcdmorc
and howe they crept in.4.7. 5. and more,p3rtly by ignorauncc and'
Gregory pronounccth that the partly by negligence of Bifhops:
title of vniuerfall bifhop was deui- which deftrudion of the whole
fed by the dcucll,and published by order of the Church Bernardc la«
the crier of Antichrift.4.7.4. menteth and layeth tochePopcf
It is proued by the vfe of the old charEe.4.7. 18,22.
/ 0000 ij
-W-^ The Tabic.
The infolccc and (hamclcfncflc waycs profitable isthc crercifcof
of the bifhops of Rome in fctring Praying, ^.zo.i.although the Lord
forth their ownc fupieme autho- will not ccalT^ while wecraucnoT,
ritic; 4.7.19,10. which is reproued nornedethanytoputhitninmind.
by fayings of Cyprianc and Grc- Scfi.g.
gorie.Scd.21. Thcfirft rule of well framingc
Rome can not be the mother of our Prayer, is that we be no other-
all ChurchcSjforaTmuch as it is no wife difpofcd in harte and minde
Church. Neither can the billiop of than becommcth them that enter
Rome be head of bi{hops,iith he is into talkc with God. j. 20.4,5.
no bifhop. 4.7.2^,24. " The feconde rule is,y in Praying
Ic is proued by Paulc , that the we alway fecle our ownc nedmcfle,
Popeis Antichrift.4.7.25. and that earncftly confidering that
Although the Church of Rome we wante all thefe things that wc
in olde time had had the honor of af ke , we ioine with our Prayer an
{iipremicie 5 yet the fame is not to earncft and feruent defirc toob-
be bounde to a place. 4 7. 2(^,29. ceine.g.io.^.
Of the mancrs of the citic of We ought to pray at all times,
Rome,ofthePopc,andoftheCar- and in the grcateft qoictnelTe of
dinals and their diuinity.4. 7.27,2 8. ourcftatcs, the onely remebraunce
The Bifhop of Rome firft layed of our finnes ought to be no fmall
hand vpon kingdomcs,& then vpon prouocatio to mouc v$ to that exer-
the Empire: Which is proued by cife. ^.20.7.
moft (harpe reprehcnfions of Ber- The thirde rule of Praying well,
narde to be vnmete for him that is that we forfake all conHdence of
bofteth himfelfe the fuccefTor of our owne glory, left if wee prcfum*
the Apottles.4.ii .11. pruoufly take any thing,be it nruer
Of the gift ofC6ft3ntine,wher- fo httle , vnto our felues , wee with
with he laboreth to hide his rob- our vainc pride , fall downe from
bery,4. It. 12. andhowethereare his face. 5.20.8. .
not yet fiue hundred yeare paft, The beginning of Praying well,
fincc the Popes were in fubicdio of is the obtaining of pardon, with an
Princes, and by what occafiion they humble and pbine confcffion of
hauc (hakcn ic of^Scd.i^.and how offence.j.20.9.
they brougiit the citic ofRome into In what fenfe the Prayers of ccr«
their power , but about a hundred cainc holy men are to be taken , in
and thirty yeare ago.Seifl. 14. which to entrcate God,they feemc
Vrayer, to alledge their ownc u^hte6uC»
Trc w faith can not be ydle from neflc. 3 . 20. i o.
callinge vpon God.5.20.i. The fourth rule of Praying well,
Howe necciTary and howe many is that being fo oucrthrowen and
beaten
The Tabic.
beaten downe with trcwc humi- of God,but wrath & terror, j. 20.19.
liticjwe be ncucrihclcfrc cncoura- It is not againft Chnftcs ojfficc of
gcd to Pray with an aflTured hope mcdiatonthat we be comniaunded
,toobtcinc; SoinourPrayerSjfaith to Prayoncforanothcr.3.20.19.
and repetaunce do mete rogether, A confutation of the Sophiftcrs
J. 20. 1 1. deuife , which fay that Chrift is the
Of the certainty of faith» where- mediator of redemption , and the
by the faithful! do determine that faithfull arc mediators of interccf-
Godis fauorable vnto them: And fion.j. 20.20.
ho we neceflary y fame is in Prayer: Agamft them, which make dead
Neither is that certainty weakened, Saindcs interccflbrs to God for
when it is ioined with acknow- thcmjor do mingle the intcrccflion
ledging of our own mifery.^. 20.12. of Chrift.with the Prayers and rac-
God comaundeth vs to call vpon rites of dead men. 3.20.21.
him:hcc promifeth , that we (halbc This foohflineflc hath procedcd
heard : both thcfc things are- ne- in the papacie to groflc monftrouf-
ccflTjry , that we may Pray in faith, nefle of vngodlincfle , and to hor-
j.zo.ig. riblcfacrilcgcs.j.20.22.
T here are rehearfed diuerfc pro- A confutation of the arguments
mifesof God, with the fwetemflc wherewith the papiftcs labour to
whereof they that are not ftirred confirme the intcrccflion of dead
vp to Pray, arc ahogcther vnexcu- Saindtcs.g.zo.z^, 24,2^,26.
fable. 3.20. 14. ' It is vnlawefuU to direde our
An expoiition of certaine places, Prayers to dead Sainftcs,forafmuch
wherein God femeth tohaue af- as thiskindeofworfhippingedoth
fented to fomc roennes Prayers moft properly belong to God a-
which yet were grounded vpon no lone. j. 20. 27.
promjre.5.20. If . Of the forts of Prayer,& chicfe-
Thcfe foure rules of Praying well, ly of thankefgeuing ; Alfo of the
are not examined with fo extreme continuall cxercife of the faithfull
rigor , but that God herein doth in Prayer and thankefgeuing, j.
beare with many infirmities , yea 20.28,2 p.
many intemperances in them that Ofthe babbling of the papifte$,&
be his, which is proued by many of auoiding allbofting in Prayers,
examples. 3.20. 16. of departing into fecret places , and
We muft alway Pray in the name of pubhke Prayers.;. 20, 29.
of Chnft onely , 3. 20. 17. neither Publike Prayers muft be made
were the faithfull euer hearde any in the common and natiue fpcachc
other wife.Sc<5l. 18. of the lande. And there is entrea-
Tliey which Pray otherwifcjhauc ted of kneling and vncouering of
nothing Icftc for chl at the throne the hed at Prayer. 3 . 20. 3 3.
0000 «j
'"^^
y^ The Tabic.
Of y infinite woodneffe of Chrift, Ic is proucd that the doftrine of
which hath alfo appointed vs a Predeftinatiois adodrineofmoft
forme of Prayer : And howe great fwetc frute. There are rehearfcd
comfort commechvntovs thereby, three principall profites thereof:
j.io 54. and they are admonifhed which
A diuifion of the Lordes prayer, being moued with a ccrtam curio-
3.ZO.35. fnic do beyond the boundes of
An cxpoficion of the fame prayer. Scripture breake into the fecrete*
3.20.56. of the wifedomeof God: ^.ir 1,2.
The fame in euery point is a per- and alfo they which wouUi hauc
fe<il and vpright prayer, 3.10.48. all mention of Predeftination to
wherunto notiing ought to be ad- be buried, Sc<fl.3.4.
ded, although we may vfe other What is Predeftination,and what
wordes in making our prayers. Scdt. is the foreknowled^^e of God , and
49. howe the one of them is wrong-
Of the confidence which the fully fet after the other.The exam-
name of the children of God doth pie of Predeftination in all the of-
bring vntovs, which euen the con- ip'ing of Abraham m refped of
fcienre oF our finnes ought not to other nations, is c5ftrmcd by many
ouerthrowc. 3.20.36,37. teftsnioniesof Scripture.3.zi.y.
Ahhough wc ought to pray for Alfo there is ihcwcd a fpeciall
all men, and fpecLilly for them of Piedei^snati6,wherby euen among
the houfeholde of faith, yet this the ChiLiren theinfelues he hath
withflrandeth not, but that we may made difference betwene fome and
praye fpecially , both for oui felues other fomc.Sed.^.7.
and certain other. 3. 20. 38, 59,47. A confirmation of the dodrinc
Ofthe boldnes of afking which of Piedeihnation taken out of tc
the Lordc graunteth to his,and the Ihmonics of Scripture. Bo. 3. Chap,
truft of obtaining. 3. 10.47. iz.
It is good thaceucryone ofvs Ofthem thatmakeaforeknowr
for cxercife, appoint to himrelfc ledge of Merites the caufe of Pre-
certame peculiar hcures to praye, deftination. Alfo of other men that
fo that it be done without fuper- bbme God becaufe he cledeth
ilitiousobferuation. 3.20.50. fome and pafleth ouer other. 3.
In all our prayer we ought dili- 22 i.
gently to beware that we go not Godas wellineledion as inrc-
about to binde God to certain e probatio hath no refped of workes
circunftances. 3.10. 50. neither paffed nor to come,but his
Of pcrfeueraunce and patiecc in good pleafure is the caufe of both,
thcexercifeofprayer.3.20.p,5i, 3.21.1,3,4,5,6.7.11.
Tredeftination, This ii proued by Au^uftinc,
^Scas.
The Tabic.
Scd. 8. and tb€ trifling futile deuife dodrinc oucrthroweth all cxhorta-
of Thomas to the contrary is con- tions to godly life , it is proued by
futcd.Sed.9. Auguflinc that preaching hath hij
The proraifes of faluation arc courfe,and yet the knowledge of
not direded to all , but peculiarly Predeltinaiio is not hindrcd there-
to the elc<f^.g.2z. 10. by,?.zg.ij.
Thefe two fayingcs do not difa- In this point of do<flrinc wc muft
grcc, that God by the outwaidc fo temper our maner of teaching
preaching of y word calleth many, the truth , that fo farrc as wc may.
and yet he gcucth the gifte of faith we wifely beware of Offence, j.
tofevve.j.ix.io. 2J.14.
Againft them which foconfeflc Whereas fomc obey the prea-
cledion , that yet they deny any to ching of the worde of God , and
be reprobate of God. J. 2^. I. other fome defpifc it, or be more
The reprobate do in vaine con- blinded and hardened thereby, al-
tend with God, forafmuch as God though this come to paffc by their
oweth them nothing, and willeth pwnc mahcc and vnthankfulnefle,
nothing otherwifc tha righteoufly, yet we muft ihcrwith alfoknowe,
and they themfelues may Hnde that this diuerfitichagethvpon the
iuftc caufes of their damnation in fecrct counfcll of God, than which,
thcmfeJues.^.2^.2,5,4,5. itis vnlawfull for to fearch for any
An aunfwcrc to the wicked que- further caufe.g. 24.12,1^,14.
ftion of certaine men , why God An expofition of ccrtaine places
fliould blame men for thefe things wherein God femcth to deny that
whereof he hath layed a necedicic it commeth to pafle by his oudi-
vpon them by his Prcdcftination. naunce that the wicked peri{he,but
5.25 6,8,9. inafmuch as againft his will they
A definition of Prcdcftination. wilfully bring dcftrudion vppon
5.23.8. themfelues. And there is (hewed
A confutation of them which that thofe places make nothing a-
gaiher of the dodrine of Predefti- gainft the dodrine of Prcdeftina-
nation,that God hath rcfped of tion.^, 24.15,16.
perfons.5.23.io, II. The vniuerfalneHc of the pro-
Againft thofe hoegs which vn- mifcs of faluation, makcth nothing
der color of Prcdcftination do go againft the dodrine of the Prede-
carelcfly forwarde in their finnes: ftinaiion of the reprobate ; and
and againft all them which fay that yet not without caufearethey fra-
if this dodrine take place , all en- med vniuerfally.^,24.i6.
dcuor of well working decayeth. j. Here alfoare coiifuced ccrtaine
S3.12. pbiedions of them, which deny
Againft them which (i»y that this this point of dodrine.
0000 iil;
. ^^ The Tabic.
Triejihode, Kingdome^trnd Vro- ftrcngth and vcrtue flgainft the
phctkall office of Chifl. deujlland all his aflaults : Andfo
ThAt wcc msy knowc to what Chnft reigneih for vs rather than
cndChrift wasfcntof hi$fathcr,& for himfelfe , whereupon we are
what he brought vnto vs , three rightfully called Chriihans-.Wherc
things arc chicfely to be confide- it is faid that at the laft day he fhall
red in him.his Prophetical! Office, ycldc vp his kingdome to God and
hi$Kingdome,and hisPriefthodc: his Father, and fuch like fayin^s
and therefore is gcuen to him the the fame maketh Aonhing againft
tide of Chrift (or Mcflias which the eternity of his kingdome. i.
fignifieth annoinred ) although he i ^AiS-
be fpeciallyfo called in refpedl of his As touchinii bis Pricfthode,thaC
kingdome. Albeit that God alway the efficacv and profii thereof may
gaue Prophets and teachers to his come to vs,it is llicwcd that wc
Church,yctitisprouedthatall the muftbegin atthi* dcathof Clirift.
Godly loked for full light of vnder- Hereupon it followeth that hcc is
(landing, onely at the corfimingof an cucilaftingintercefTorjby whofc
Meflias:and that he when heap- mediation we obteine fauorjwhcr-
pearedwas annointcd a Prophet, by arifcth to Godly confcicnces
not onely for himfelfe , but alfo for both bol Jcnefll- to pray, ^wd quiet*
all his body. 2.1^1, i. ntire:Hnally that he is fo a Pneft,
As touching his kingdome , firft that he ioineth vs in the fcllovvihip
we muft note the fpirituall nature of fo great an honor, to the endc
thereof, whercuppon alfo is ga- that the SacnHces of prayers and
thered the etcrr>all continuauncc praifc which c'ame from vs, may be
of it , which is of two fortes: the acceptable to God. 2. 15.6.
one perteineth to the whole body Tromlfcs.
of the Church , the other is pro- Not without caufe all the Pro-
pre to eucry member : Both fortes mifes are concluded in Chrift : for-
are declared and plainly fet forth afmuch as cuery^Promifc is a tc-
by teftimoncs of Scripture. 2. ftifyingofthelawe of God toward
if.^. vs,and none of vs is beloued of
It is declared that the profit of God without Chrift. Neither waf
the kingdome of Chrift can not Naaman the Syrian.Corncliusthc
otherwife be percciued of vs , but captaine, nor y Eunuche to whom
when we knowledge it to be fpi- Philip was carried , without know-
rituall : And the fame profit con- ledge of Chrift , although they had
fifteth in two things > namely that but a very fmall taft of hiT) , and
it enricheth vs with all good things a faith in fome parte vnexpreifed,
nccelTary to eternall faluation , fe- y 2.52.
condly that it fortifieth vs with The Lord,to the endc to fill our
hearces
The Tabic. ^^^-
hcartc with loue of rightcoufncire foiinc.beforc which he would both
and hatred of wickcdncifcjWas not light to be, and the earth to a-
content to fct forth bare commau- boundc with all kmdc ot good
demcRtes only, but added Promifcs things : which alfo wc read tohaue
of blcdi.igs both of this prefentlife ftand (hi by the fpace of two daies, '
andof eteKn.Tllblefledneffc, &alfo and gone backe two degrees at the
thrcatninges both of prcfcnt mifc- commaundemcnt of God. i.i6.z«
rics, and of etcrnall death : The alfoby thcftirresand fignesof the
thrcatnings declare the great pure- heauen , which the vnbelcucrs do
nesof GodcthePromifesdolhew feare.Sed.j.
his grcit loue to righteoufncjjand The almightincs of God is bu-
his wonderful goodnes toward me. fied in continuall doingc, fo that it
2.8.4. cxtendeth to cucry particular aft,
OfihePromifc of Godsmer- and nothinge happcneth but by
cv to be extedcd to a thoufand ^c- his councell:VVhich who fo do not
Derations. 1.8. 2 1. acknowledge, they defraude God
Although the promifesof the of his glorieand do extenuate his
law be conditional,yct they are not goodnes •• But we on the other lidc
giuen in vaine.i,7.4. do rccciuc double fruteihcrofi.i5
Vroph cticall ojjic e of Clmjl, j .
See Tricjlhode.i^c. It is proued that the Prouidencc
VrouidenceofGod. of God doth not onely beholdc
Proph3nemcn;by flefnly vnder- things that are donCjbutgouerneth
ft.indmcj do confefic God the crc.i- ali fucccfles: VVhcrebv is oucrthro-
tor,othcrwife th^nv/edobyfairh: v^cnthe famed muention of bare
forafmuch as faith doth teach that foreknowledge &ofvniuerfal Pro-
he is alfo the goucrnour of all uidence only: Alfo the error of the
thm::s , not by a ccrtainc vniiierfal Epicures \s coFuted,& oFthe which
motio,but by a lingular Pr ouidecc, giue to God a gouernaunce onely
which extendeih cuen to the Icart aboue the middle region of the aire,
fparow.i. 16. 1. Yet there may a certaine vniuerfall
They which giue any thini^c to Prouidece be grauntcd, but fo,thac
fortune, do bury the Prouidence of y fpeciall Prouidcnce be not darkc-
Godjby whofe fecretc councell all ned, which doth goucrne not onely
*ucccilcs are goucrned. 1. 16. z. ccrtainc but all particular doingcf„
Thinges without life, although 1.1(^.4,^.
cche of the liauc their property ni- That not only the beginning of
turally planted in them , yet do not motion is in the dilpofing of God,
put forth their force,butfo f?rre,as is proued by the plentifollneflc of
they bedirc<ftcd by y prcfcnt hand oncyeareandthe barrcnncfleof an
'of God : Which is proued by the other, for whereas God calleth the
-'^- The Tabic.
one his ble{linge,and the other his Agamft cercaine dogges , which
curfe and vengeance, i. i6.j. at this day do barckc againft y Pro-
The Prouidence of God in go- uidence of God, it is proucd by the
uerning the worlde,is chiefly to be Scripture that wheras God hath Co
confidcred in mankinde,and in the rcucaled his will in the lawe & the
diuerfe cftate ofall men, & diuerfe gofpeljy he illuminateth the minds
difpo(ingeofruccefles.i.i6.6,7.A- of them that be his with the fpirite
gainft them which cauill, that this ofvnderftandingCjto pcrceiue the
dodrine of the Prouidcce of God, myfteries therein contained,which
is the Stoikes dodrin of fate or de- othcrwife are incomprehelible, yec
fiinie.i. i6.8, the order of gouernmg the worldc
Whether any thinge happen by is called a bottolefle depthjbecaufc
fortune or chaunce : Where is re- when we know not the caufes ther*
hearfcd the fayinge of Balilius Ma- of,yet we ought reucrctly to honor
gnus, that Chaunce and Fortune it. 1. 17.2.
arc words of heathen men:alfo the Such prophane men do foolifli-
faying of Auguftine,that he repen- \y comber themfelues , when they
ted that he hadde vfed the name of alleage that if the dodrine of the
Fortune. Yet thofe thinges may be Prouidence of God be true , then
faid to happe by fortune in refped the prayers of the faithful in which
of vs, which beinge confidcred m they aske any thinge for time to
their nature, or weyed according to come, arc vaine , no counccll is to
our knowlcdge,do feme fo,althogh be taken for things to come,& then
in the fecret councell of God they men which do any thing againft the
be neceflary : Alfo all thinges that lawe of God, do not finne : Thefe
are to come,may be faid to br^ hap- daungcrous errors they ihall auoid,
peningjinafmuch as they be vncer- which in confideringe the Pr oui-»
taineto vs. 1.16.8,91 dence of God , (hall frame thcm-
Wh.u things are to be confide- feluestotruemodefty.i.17.5.
rcd,that the dodrine of the Proui- As concerning things to come,
dence of God may be referred to a it is proued that the Scripture doth
right handc,that we haue the pro- well ioyne the aduifemcnts of men
fit thereof; And where the caufes of with the Prouidence of God : be-
ihofe things that happen, appearc caufe we are not hindered by his e-
not vnto vs , we muft beware that tcrnall decrees , but that vnder his
we do not thinke, that thinges are will , we may both forefee forour
rolled by the fway of fortune ; but fclues,and order our owne thinges:
we muft fo reuercnce his fccrete For the knowledge of confultingc
iudgcmentes, that we efteemehis and taking heede,3re infpired into
wil the moft luft caufe of al things, men by the Lord,whereby we may
1. 17, t. fcrue his Prouidencc,in the prefer-r
ujng
^^»
The Tabic.
fjing of our owne life. 1. 17.4. workcth diucrfc waics/omtimc by
In all fucclles of time patt the takinge away their wit, fometimc
Will of God doth gouernc-.and yet when he grjwntcth them witte, he
the doers of wicked dedes are not fraycth them that they dare not go
cxcufed, becaufethey areaccufed about that which they haue con-
by their owne confcience , and do cciucd : and foiniimc alfo when he
notobey the wil of God, but their fuffereth them to go about it, he
owne luftiThcy arc in dede the in- breaketh their entcrprifcs : Vppon
ftrumentsofGodsPioujdence,but which knowledge neccflfarily folo-
fojthat they finde the whole euil in weth a thankefulncffe of mindc in
thcmf(.laes,& in God is found no- fo profperous fuccelfc of thinges.i,
thing but a lawfull vfe of their cuil- 17.7.
ncffe, 1. 17,5. & 1. 18. 4. Where alfo Inaduerfity v/hen wearehurt by
the (amc thing is fiiewedin thee- men, is required patience and quiet
ledion ofking-e rarobeam,theten moderation of minde : Which is
tribes forfakinge the houfe of Da- fliewed in the examples of lofeph
uid, the (laughter of the fonnes of being afflided of his brethren, lob
Achabj & in the betrayinge of the pcrfecuted of y Chaldees,& Dauid
Sonne of God. rayled vponof Semer. If we hap-
A Godly and holy meditation pen to be diftrcflcd with any mife-
of theProuidenccofGod, which ry without the worke of men, this
is taught by the rule of godhnefie: felfe fame dodrine is the beft re-
firii tiat beinge certaiiiely perfwa- medy againd impatience , becauic
ded that no thinge h^ppeneth by the Scripture teftiHcth , that euen
forruiic , we alway caft our eyes to aduerfities alfo do come fro God. I
God the chiefe caufe of al thmges: 17.8.
then that we dout not that his fin- A Godly man principally rcgar-
gular Prouidcnce watcheth for vs, dinge the prouidence of God , yet
whether we haue to do with men will nor leaue infenour caufesvn-
as well euil as good, or with his o- marked. Therfore if he haue recei-
ther creatures : To which v fe wc ued a benefice of any man , he will
muft apply the promifes of God in hartily know and confefle himfelfc
the Scripture which tclhfie y fame, to be bounde vnto him. If he haue
the examples whereof are rehear- taken harme or done harme to a-
red.1.176. ny other by his negligence or wac
We mufl alfo adioyne thofc re- of heede , he will impute it vnto
ftimonies of Scripture which teach himfclfe, much leflc will he cxcufc
that al men arc vnder the power of his owne offences . In thingcs to
God, whether wc nedc to ^ct their come chiefly he will haue confide-
good wiis or reftrainc the mahce of ration of inferiourcaufes, but yet
our enemies: which iail point God fo^thac in decermininge he will not
inc labic.
be caricd away with his owne wir, coueting to get a praifc of modefty,
but committc himfelfe to the wife- go about to maintainc y righteouf-
dom of God : ncUlier (hall his truft nefll- of God with a Jying defence,
fo ftay vpon outwarde hclpcs, that when they fay : that thoTe thinges
he will carclefcly reft vpon them if which Sathan and all the reprobate
he haue them, nor be difmaicd for do naughtily, are done by the fuffe-
fcareifhc want them. 1. 17.9, ranccofGod, and not by his pro-
A large defcription of the incfti- uidcncc and will. Anditi^proued
mablc fchcicie of a Godly mindc by the affiidion of Iob,thc dccei-
which refteth vpon the Prouidecc uing of Achab,the killing of Chrift,
ofGod: and on the other fide the the inceftuous adultery of Abfo-
mifcrablc carefulncfle wherewith lon,and many other cxamples,thac
Wc muft needes be diftrcffcd when men do workc nothingc but thac
ihe wcakenes of this earthly cotage which he hath alredy decreed with
makcth vs fubicft to (b many dif- himfelfe , and doth appoynt Co to
eafes , fith our life and fafety isbc- be by his fecretcdircdion. 1.18.1.
iieged with infinite daungers at And this hath place, not only in
home> abroadc, vpon the bndc,in outward doinges,but alfo in fecrctc
the water,by men^& by deuils. 1. 17 moti5s. For it is proued by the har»
10, 1 1. deninge of Pharao and other tcfti-
Thofe places of Scripture where monies, that God worketh euen in
it is faid that God repented him : the mindcs alfo and hartcs of the
make nothing againft the dodrinc wickediNeither makcth it any thing
of prouidence, forafmuch as therin to the contrary, that oftentimes the
(like as alfo when he isfaydtobc worke of Sathan is vfed therein:
angry)the Scripture applying it fclf For God worketh neuerihclcfle,
to our capacity defcribeth him,not bur after his owne manner , vfinge
fuch as he is , but fuch as we fcelc a iuft rcuenge, 1. iS.i.and therefore
him to be. Likcwife, where he fpa- God is not the author of finnes,
red the Niniuites,to whom he had Scd.4.
thrcatned dcftrudion within forty They arc proued gilty of intol-
dayesrwhcras he prolonged the life lerable pride, which rcfufc this do*
of Ezechias for many ycres,to who drine vnder pretence of modefty. A
he had declared prefent deathe : confutation oftheirobiedionwhe
bccaufe fuch threatnings containe they fay, that if nothing happe but
an vnexprefl'ed conduion.Which is with the will of God, then hath he
Well proued by a like example in in himfelfe two contrary wils , for-
King Abimelcchjwhich was rcbu- afmuch as he doth appoynt thofe
ked for Abrahams wife. 1. 17. 12,1 J, thinges to be done by his fecrctc
14. counfelliwhich he hath openly for-
A confutation of them , which bidden by his law. And there is flie-
wcd
The Tabic.
wed , that God doth not difagrec neither is Sathan or the wicked eX«
withhimfelFe, that the will of God cufcd, but there is diiFcrcncc be-
is not chaun^ed , that he doth not twenc the one & the other,both in
fame himfelfc to nil! that which he the cnde and maner of doing. 2.4.1,
wiUcth-.but whcras there is in God, j.
but one fimple will , the fame t« vs The old writers oftentimes rc-
appearcth diucrfc , becaufc for ferred thefcthingSjOottothe wor*
the weakencflTc of our vnderitan- king of God, but to his foreknow-*
dingc.wc conceiue not howc he di- • ledge or fufferance , Icaft the wic»
uerfly both willeth not,and willeth kcd fhoulde thereby take occaHoa
one felfe thing to be done. Finally to fpeake irreucrenrly of the works
it is proucd by Auguftine, that man of God. But the Scripture, when ic
(bmetimes with good will willeth faith that God blindcthjhardcncth
fomthinge which God willeth not: and fuch hke , dedarcth fomewhat
Be fometime willeth that thing with more than a fufferance : although
euill will , which God willeth with God do worke two wayes in the
good wil. 1.18.5. reprobate, namely by forfakingc
The confidcration of Gods po- them , and takinge his fpirite from
wer in goaerning this frame of hea- them,and alfo by deliueringe them
uen 8c earth«and all the partes that to Sathan the minifter of his wrath*
are in them. 1. 5.^. *-4'^4.
The felowfliip of men is fo go« The miniftcry of Sathan is vCcd
ticrnedbytheprouidenccofGod, to ftirre forwarde the reprobate,
that he (heweth himfelfc Jiberall, whcnfoeucr the Lordc by his pro-
mercifuU, righteous > and fcuerc. I. uidence dirc^ieth them hither or
5.6. thithcr.2.4.5.
Thofe thinges which in the life Turgatery,
ofmen are copied chaunccs,as well We ought not to winkeat the
of profpcrity as aduerfity,are fo ma- dcftrine of Purgatory , forafmucb
ny tokens of the heaucnly Proui- as it is a damnable inucntion of Sa-
dence, i. 5.7. and ought to awaken than, which maketh voide y crofTe
vstothe hope of the hfe to come. ofChrift,&c.j.5.6.
Sed.9. An expofition of ccrtainc places
How God v/orketh in the hartes of Scripture which the Papiftes do
of the that be his:& Sathan in them wrongefully wreft to the confirma-
that be his, but yet fojthat they arc tion of their Purgatory, j.y.7,8,^.
not cxcured.2.4. 1. An aunfwcrc to the obicdion of
God workcth alfo in the wicked, the papiftcs,that it hath bin an an-
&euen in the fame worke where- cicnt vfageof theChirch]^praieri
in Sarban wbrketh , and yet is not (hold be made for the dead. Where
God fo faid to be y author ot Cianc, is Viewed that this was done by the
•'VVV
Tlie Tabic.
in the oldie rime, without the word AnexpofitionhovycwclKouIdc
of God , by a ccrcainc wrongefull fay that God was our enemy vntill
imitation , lead Chnftians, if they he was reconciled to vs by Chi ift,
were flow in hauinse care of fune- whereas to giue Chrift to vs,nnd to
rals and the deade , ihoulde feeme preucnt vs with mercy,vvere (i^nes
worfc tha heathen men.Yet herein of ^he louc wherewith he before
was a great dtftei ece betwene this embraced vs. And there is (hewed
flipping of thefe olde men,and the that the Scnprure vfcth this fpeach
obftmatecrrourofthepaptfies.g y and Inch other, to apply it felfe to
xo. our capacity : and yet it doth noc
R. fay ciie faaie faifcly. And all this is
Kedemer Chrifi. proucd by the authority of Scr ip-
THe knowledge of God y Crea- ture,& the teihmony of Auguftinc.
tor IS vnprofitable vnto vs,vn- 2. 16,2,5.
leffc faith do alfofo!ow,fcttini» him KcgencraiUn.
forth in Chrift a father & Redemer Againft certaine Anabaptif^cs
tovs, and this dodrinc from the whichinuet a phrentike intempc-
bcginnino of the world in all ages rancc in ftcdc of fpirituall R egene-
hath bin holden amongc the chiU ration, namely that the children of
dren ot God.2.6. i. Godbcingc nowreitored into the
It is proued by diuerfe argu' (iate of innoccncy, ought no more
mentcs and teftimonies of Scrip- to becarefull to bridle theluft of
turc > that the happy ftace of the the flefli,but only to folow the Spi-
Church hath alway bm grounded ritforthcir guide.5.3.14,
Vpo the perfon of Chnft. Foi both The reft pertaining to thismat-
thc fiift adopno of thechofenpco- terjfecin the title of Repentance.
ple,& the prefcruing of the church, Religion.
the deliuerancc of them in perils, Neccffity cnforceth the rcpro-
and tiie rcftonnge after their dilVi- bate to confefle that there is fomc
pation,didalway hange vppon the God. 1.4.4.
graccofy mediator. And the hope They arc decciued v;hich fay
ofali the Godly was neuerrepofed that Religion was deuifed by the
any other where than in Chrift, 2. futtehy of certaine men to holdc
6.2,5,4. the fimple people in order. 1.5.2.
It is to be diliocntly confidercd The very wicked & godJes men
how Chrift hath fulfilled the office arc copclled,whether they will or
of Redeemer , that we may finde no,tofcclethatthcrc isaGod,!.^.
in him all thinges ncceflary for vs, z. & in what fenfe Dauid faith that
fith ( as Bernard fayth ) he is to vs they thinke y there is no God. 1.4.x
light , meate , oylc , I alt , &c. x. 16. Fj!mf//ion offnnes.
I. ' Againft chem which drcame a
per-
The Tabic.
pcrfe^ion in this life, which ta- parte of hisfcucnty .• and this is
keth away ncedc of asking pardon, profitable for them. On the other
^2o.4^ fide the reprobate, when they arc
Of remiffion of finnes : and in ftriken with the fcourges of God,
what fenfe finnes are called dcttes, do already after a certaine manner
and how we are fayd to forgiue o- beginne to feele the peynes of hit
ther that hauc offended agamft vs. iudgement . Ail which thingcs arc
3-10.45. proued by teftimonics ofthc Scrip
Of the diftindion of fault and turc,and alfo by the expofitions of
peine.'wherewith moft ftrong tefti- Cbryfoftomcand Auguftinc.g.4. j*
monies of Scripture , the dotingc gj.
errour of the papiftes is confuted, God when he had forgiuen the
namely that when the fault is for- adultery of Dauid, chaftifcd him
giucn yet God retayneth the peine, both for common example,and al-
which remaineth to be redeemed fo to humble him:and for this rea-
with raiisfa(ai6s:5.4.Z9,go.& there fon he dayly makcth the faithful!
alfo is fhewed that they can nor (to whom he is mercifull) fubie<3
fcape away with their diftmdion to the common miferies of this life
betwcne cuerlafting peine & tern- S.4g5.
porall pcines. An expofition of the article of
Of certaine places of Scripture the Crcde,concerning remilTion of
wherewith they go about to con- finnes.4. 1.20,21.
firme their errour:where is declared The keies were giue to y Church,
thdt there are two kindes of the to forgiue finnes , not only to men
iudgement of Go d:the one of ven • at their firit conuerfion to Chrift,
geance, the other of chaftifement, but to the faithful all then hfc log.
which are wifely to be diftmgui- 4.1.22.
ihcd a fundcr.^.4.gi. This dodrine is proued by tefti-
The firft of thefe , that is to lay monies of Scripture againft the
vengeance, the faiihfull haue aU Nouatians & certaine of the Ana-
way earneftly prayed to efcaperthc baptiftcs.which faine that the pco«
other , that is to fay chaftifement, pie of God are by baptifme regc-
they haue receyued with quiete iterate into an angclikclife,andaf-
minde , becaufe it hath a teftimo- terward there remaineth no pardo
ny ofloue.And whereitisfaidthat for them that fall. 4. 1.23,24,25,26,
Godisangry with his Saintes, the 17.
fame is not meant of his purpofc A confutatioofthe which make
or affcdion to punifhe them, but is a voluntary tranfgreilion of the law
fpoken of the vehement feelinge a finne vnpardonable.4. 1.28.
of ibrowe wherewith they are ftri- Kepemance. . ;* >. . ; .
ken fo foouc as they beare any Repcntacccommcthoffaithid;
^^ The Tabic.
gocthnotbcforcit.^. ^.i. the (orowfulnflii that is accordinge
A confutation of their rcafbns to God. 5.^.7.
which ihmke othervvifc , but here- Thirdly that fayingc is declared
by is not figni{ied any Ipacc of time that Repentance confiftcth of two
wherein faith bredcih repentanceL parts,tht Mortification of the ftclh,
but only is fhe wed that no man can and tiie quickening of the Spuitc. j
carnei^ly cndcuor himfelfc loRc- 9.8.
pcntance vnlelJe he know himfclfe Both thefc things do we obtainc
to be Gods. Of the errour pf cer- by partakingc of Chriil,the fiift by
Caine Anabaptjfies , lefuitcs, and communicatingc of his death , the
fuch other which appoint to their fcconde of his reiurrcdjon.Tiicre-
nouicesjcertainc dayes for Repcn- fore Repentance is a new iorminge
tance.3.5.2. of the image of God in v$ , & a re-
Certaine learned men long be- (lorir.ge into the 1 ighteoufncfTe of
ibrc this time, made two partes of God by thebenelitofCtirift : And
Repentance,namely Mortification, this reftoring is not fufillcd in vs in
which they commonly call coiitri- one tnomcnr. ^. g.p.
lion,and Viuification which they But there remaineth in all the
wrongfully expound to be comfort faintes, while they line in mortall
by the feling of the mercy of God, body,matterof ftrif with their flelh,
whereas it rather fignificth a defirc and fo thought all the ccclcfiaftical
toliucwcll.3 J.J. wrytcrs that haue bin of foundc
They doalfo make two other iudgemcm: & fpecially Auguftine,
fortes of Repentance, the one of which caJleth this nouiiftiment of
the lawe, the other of the Gofpcll: euiU and difeafe of luftinge in the c-
whcrc alfo are {hewed examples of led, weakencs,and fomtimc finne:
cither forte out of the Scripture, j. And in dtcdc it is (inne. j> j- 10.
J. 4. This is confirmed by thetcftl-
A true definition of Repentance monyofPaulc,& by thefummeof
take out of the Scripture, And how the commaundcments. Whereas it
Repentance though it cannot be isfaydyGod cleanfcth his church
feuercd, yet oui^ht to be diftingui- from all finne , the fame is fpoken
/bed from faith. J. J. ^. rather of ihe giltintile of finne tha
A plainer declaration of the dc- of the matter of Imne ii fclf, which
finiiio of Repentancc:whcrc firft is cealfeth not to dwell m the regcnc-
ihcvvedj^thereis requiringc a tur- rate (but ceafTeih to reigne in
ningJoGcd, that is to fay an alte- thcm)thoughitbenoiimputcd.5.}
ration, not only in outward wcikcs, 1 1.
but alfo in the foule it fclf, j.g.6.the A declaratio of the feucn caufef
that it procf deth of an earneft fearc or cffeds, or partes or affedions of
of God: Where alfo is entreated of Repeniance^which Paul rcbearfeth:
Thofc
The Tabic.
Thofc be ftudy or carcfulnefTcjCx- of haynous offenders and ccrtaioe
cufing,dirpleafurc,feare,dc(ire,2clc, oiherrand of the ordinary penance
reucnge. Whcreunto alfo is added which the children of God , euen
out of Paul, and declared by an ex- the mofl perfed , ought co v(c ^11
cellent admonition of Bernard,thac their life long.^ .3. j8.
in fuch rtuenge we muft kecpc a God doth therefore freely iufti-
irieafure. J. 5. 1 5. fie them that be h Js,thac he may ai-
The frutcs of Repentance arc, fo with the SandiHcatio of his fpi-
deuoiion lowarde God,chaMt) to- rit refiore ihem into true nghtic-
vvard men, holmes and purcnes m oufncs: T hereforc Iohn,Chnft and
all our l!fc:but al thefe ought to be- the Apoftlcs,prcachcd Repentance
ginne at the inwardc aftedio of the and rcmiffion of /inn- s . The ef-
heatt, from whence outwarde tc- fed of which laying is declared. 3. j
ftunonies may aftcrwarde fpringe 19. ,,')n /
forrh:Wherc alio is fpokcn ot ccr- Chrifti^ms ought to cxcrcifeihe-
taine outward exerciles of Repen- felucs in a contjnuall Repentance>
tancCjwhich the olde writers feme & he hath moll: profiiedjthac haih
to enforce fomwhat too much. 5. 3. learned moil tomiflikehimlelfe.j.
16. 3.20.
Turninge of the heart to God, Repentance is a fingular gift of
-is thecniefepoint of Repentance: God , vnto which he caileth all
fackcloth and f.lbcs , wcping & fa- men , which he giucih 103JI them
'ftingjWere vfed of thtm in the olde whom l.c purpofeth to faue,and
time before Chrift,3S tokens of pu- which the Apollie pronounceth^
blike Rcpeniacc:of which the two it (hall ncuer be giucn to wilfuU a-
laft may yet be vfcd to npp^afe the poftaraes whole wickcdnefTc is vn-
wrath of God in y miferaDlc times pardonable , that is to fay , fuch as
of the Church. ^.^.17. haue finned againft the holy ghoft
Thenameof-Repcntancc orpe- J.3.1.
nance isvnpropeily dravven from Altnough fainedRepecancedoth
hisnaturall fenleto this outwarde not pleafe God,yet he fomtime for
profeillon. Publikc cottlTlon is not a fcafon iparcth hypocrites which
alway neccifary in finncs : but pri- make a fl^.ewe of Ibme conuerfion,
uatc confelTion to God may ncuer which he doth not for their fakes,
be omitted, wherein w? ou^htto but for common example, that we
confeffe not or.ely thofe thinges may Icsrnc m.ore cherefully togiuc
that we hauc lately ccmmitted,but our mindcs to vnfained Repcn-
the difpleaforeof our greuous fall tanccrAndtnisis proucd by the ex-
ought alfo to calvsbackc to reme- amplesofAchab, Efau,&the Ilra-
brance of our pafTed offences . Of elites. 5. j.zf.
IpcciiU penance which is required The Schoole fophiflers do fowly
PPPP
The Tabic.
crre in thole dcGnitios which they vanity , becaufe the minde of man
make ot Repentance, and no bet- can not for dulncs, keepe the right
cer do they diuide it, when they way to fcarch out trueth, & for the
parte it into contrition of heart, mofl parthc difcerneth not of what
confclTio of mouth ^ & fatisfadion thinges it is behouefuU for him to
of worke : Where is entreated of feeke the true knowledge- z.z. 12.
certaine queftioswhich they moue: As touching earthly things,it is
whereupon is eaiily garhered,that proued by exaples that the mindc
they babble of thinges which they of man hath a iharp vndcrftading,
know not, whe they Ipeake of Re- as firft of all in ciuile policy and in
pentancc. j.4.1. gouernanccof houfeholdes, fiih c-
When they require thofc three uery man vnderftandeth that the
thingesin Repentance , they muft felowlhips of men muft be bolden
needes binde thereunto forgiue- together by lawcs, and comprchen-
nelfc of (innes: And if it be fo, then deth in niinde y principles of thoft
arc wemottniiferable, forafmuch lawes.i.z.i j.
as we can neuer haue quietnes of Alfo in liberall artcs and handy
cofcience: Which w proued firft in craftes, for Icarninge whereof,yea
that cotrition of heart fuch as they for amplifyingc and garnifhinge of
require. ^.41. the famc,there is in man a certaine
There is great difFcrece bctwcnc aptneffe , although fomc be more
the dodrine of fuch contrition , & apt tha other.But the light of Rca-
that coirition which the Scripture fon and vnderftanding in men is fo
requircth offinners, that they tru- a generallgoodqualitieinallmen,
ly hunger & thirft for the mercy of that yet it is a free gift of Gods Ji-
God.5.4.j. beralitietowardecucryman:which
In what (en(c the oldc wrytcrs thing God (heweth when he crea-
thought that folemne penance, teth fome Idiotes and dull wilted:
which was then required for hay- alfo when he maketh one man to
nous offences, might no more be cxcell in (harp inucntion, an other
eftfoones done than Baptifme. 4.1. in iudgement» another inquicke-
a^. neffc of minde , a^aine when he
"Reafon of Man, poureth into men Angular motions
Mans vnderftanding isnotfo to according vnto cuery manes caU
be condemned of perpetuall blind- }ing,and according to the time and
nes, that we leauc it no whit of vn- matter that is to be donc.2. 2. 14,
derftanding in any kinde of thing: 1 7.
but it hath fome knowledge inaf- The inuention of artcs, the or-
much as he is naturally caricd with derly teaching or dcpe & excellent
defirc to fearchc out trueth . And knowledge thereofi which appeare
yet this dcfirc by andby fallech into to hauc bin in y olde Lawyers,Phi-
lofopbers.
The Tabic.
lofopl'.crSjPhifitianSjbcing profane ucd,but the error is when it dcCce-
men, do declare vntovs thacihe deth to particular caufes,:md there
minde of men how njuch fotuer it is (hewedjthat mas vmucrfal iudgc-
be fallen from his fi; ft vprightncs,is ment m the diftercncc of good and
yet Ihil gnrnilhcd with excellent cuiljis not alway found and vpright.
gifts ofGod.z.z.h^. For it atcaineth not thofe which
They are the giftcs of the holy are the chiefc things in the fiift ta-
Ghoft which the Lorde giucth to bleof the Iavv,namely of cofidence
whom he will, euen to rhe vngodly in Gt d.&c. In the fecond tablCjal-
for the publikc benefice of man- though it hauefbmc more vndcr-
kinde. Therefore we ought to vfe Itandmge , yctit appcareth thatic
them althou ^h they be conimuni- fomrimt erreth, as when it ludgeth
cace vntovs by the miniftcry of ch.e that it is an ablurdicic to fufferto
wicked, to whom they are but tra- imperious goucrnmenc , and not to
fitory and fletinge.becaufe ihcy are reuenge wronges •• alio it knoweth
without the fcunde fundatjon of not the difeafe of dcfiic in the
trueth.i.2.i6. whole obfcruation of the lawe.i.z,
Itislliewcdinthefirft two points, 21,2^,24.
that mans Reafon fecili noihinge It is proued by the Scripture,
that concerneth the kingdonic of thatthefharpnesof our Rcafonin
God and heauenly mattersjwhich all the partes of our lire,is nothing
are contained in three thmgs,th3t before the Lord: & our mindes do
is to fay, to know God, his father- read the grace of enlightening, not
ly fauour towarde vs , and the way only at the beginningc, or for one
to frame our hfcaccordinge to the day,butateuery moment. 2. 2.25.
rule of his lawe. 2.2. iS.and to that See vndcr the title of Treexcill » cet'
purpofe are alleagc4 diuerfe tefti- taine th/'nges ^emumnge to thn mat^
monies of Scripture.Scd. 19,20,21 tcr.
In the tiiird it feemeth that he hath Bjfurreffion ofchrifl.
Come more vndcrftandingc than in Without the R^furrcdion of
the other, forafmuchasman isin- Chrift, allis vnperfccithat we be*
ftruded by the lawe of nature to a leue concerning his croffe, Death,
right lule of life. Butfuchknow^ & Burial.Thereof we receiue three
ledge is vnperfed in y vnbeltuers, profitcs : forafmuch as it hath both
& auayleth to no other end, but to purchafed vs righteoufnes before
make them vnexcufablerncither do God, & is to vs a pledge of the Re-
they by that naturall light , fee the furrcdio to comc,& by his life, wc
trueth in cuery thingc. And here is arc now regenerate into ncwneflc
expounded the fayingc of Themi- ofhfe.2.16,15.
ftiuSjthatvnderftandinginihc vni- A declaration of the hiftoryof
uerfall dcfinicion is fcldomc deed- the Refurrcdion of Chrift. j^^J^J*
PPPP ij
The Table.
Lajl 'BsfuneEikn. The firft caufc is a fhadowing of
Forafmuch as the faithfull , do fpirituall reft , that is to fay , of our
chiefcly necde hope and patience, fandificarion-.This is proucd by di-
leaft they ihould faint in the courfe ucrfe places to haue bin the chicfc
of their callinge : he hath foundly thing in the Sabbath. 2. 8. 2^. '
profited fn the Gofpel which is ac- Why the Lordc appointed the
cuftomcdioacofinuall meditation fcuenthday.2.8.30jji.
of the bleiTedRefurredion.j.zj.i This parr, forafmuch as it was ce-
2. remoniaUs take away by the death
The article concerning the laft ofChrift.2.8.^1.
Refurredion, cocaincth a dodrinc The two latter caufcs , that is to
oforcat weight, graue and hard to fay , that there fhoulde be certainc
.belcue: forthe ouercommingeof dayes appointed for aflbmblics in
which hardnes by faith, the Scrip - the Church, and that there ihould
ture giueth twb helps,the example be giuen to feruauntes a reft from
of Chrift, and the almightinelfc of iheir labour,do feruc for ail ages, i
God.?. 25. 5,4. 8.52.
A confutation of the Sadduces, Of daies ofmcting in the church
which deny the Refurredion : & of to heare the word of God & com-
the Millenaries v/hich appoint the men praiers : Where is fpokcn of
kingdonriof Chrift to endure but a obferuing of the Sonday, 2.8.^,^5
thoufand yeares.9.25.5. and of fupcrftition to be auoyded m
A confutation of their crrour, this bchalfc,2.8.^4.
which imagine that foules at y laft Sacraments,
day flisll not rt ceiue againe the bo- What is a Sacrament.4.14.1.
ciie&wherewkhihcy arenoweclo- For what reafon theoldwritcrf
thcd, but (liall haue new and other vfed this wordin that rcnre.4.14.2,
bodies.^. 25,7, 8. i^.
Ofihcmanerof thclaftRefur- A Sacrament isncuer without
re(^bon,;{,25.8. a promife going before, which the
Bv whar reafon the laft Refurrc- Lord fealeth by that meanc, wher-
€^i9nj\Yhich is a lingular benefit cf in he prcuideth helpc for our igno-
Cl^'nirjis comon alfo to the wicked ranee anddulnefTe, and aifo for our
anS tile accurfed of God. 3.25.9. vvealcenes.4. 14. 3,5,6,12,
S. A Sacrament conliftcth of the
Sahifath. worde & the outward figne:But the
AN expofition cf the fourth co- Sacramentall worde is to be taken
mautidemcntjthe endc there- otherwife than the papiftes thinkc.
of, and the three caufeswhereu- 4.144.
pun we muft note that it confifteth. Sacramcntcs ceaflc not to be tc-
iyS.iS. ftimonies of the grace of God , al-
though
The TaWe.
though they be giucn alfo to the the fame end that our Sacramcntcs
wicked, which do gather to them-. clo,that is to fay, Chrift : whom yet
felues more greuous danation thcr- our Sacramets do more plainly re-
by.4. 14.7. prefent.Whcrforc the fcholcmens
Our faith is fo confirmed by Sa- dodrinc is to be rciedcd,which fay.
craments, that yet it hangeth vpon that the olde Sacraments did Hie w
ihcinwardc effeduall working of afliadowofthegraceof God^and
the Spirite, 4. 14. 9, 10, 1 1, and no ours do giuc it prefently. 4. i4.zo,
vertue is to be put in the creatures. 2i,2z,23.&c.
Sed. 1 2. The fine falfely called Sacraments.
A confutation of the deueli(hc When we deny thofe fiuc to be
dodrine of the Sophiftical fcholes. Sacraments which are muented by
that the Sacramcntes of the ncwc men, we flriue not about the name
law do iuftifie and do giue grace, fo but the thing ; becaufe the papiftcs
that we do no: ftop it with deadly will hauc them to be vid'ble formes
(inne.4. 14.14. ofinuiliblegrace.4.19. 1.
Auguftines good diftindion be- Many reafons are brought,why it
twene a Sacrament and the ihingc is not lawfull for men to make S^-
of the Sacrament, whereby is pro- craments. Alfo there is adifferencc
ued that though God in Sacramets to be put betwene Sacraments,and
do truely offer Chri{l , yet the wic- other ceremonies.4. 19.2.
ked receiuc nothingc but the Sacra- The nuber of feuen Sacraments
mentjy is to fay, the outward fignc. can not be proued by the authori-
4.14.15,16. ty oftheoldChurch.4.i5>.^.
Wemuft netthinke that there Although the old Church vnder
^s ioyned or fattened to the Sacra- the law,had mo Sacraments, yet at
ments any fecrete vertue5whereby this day, the Chrittia church ought
they by themfelucs do giue vs the to be cocent with thofe two,which
graces of the holy Ghoft 4.14.17. Chrift hathordainediAnditisnot
In the olde time God gaue vnio lawfull for men to make otherjnor
his people fome Sacraments in mi- to adde vnto thefc any ihinge of
racles,andfome in natural thingcs. their ownc.4. 18.20.
And there is fpoken of the tree of Sacrifices.
life and of the raynebowe. 4. 14. A difference becwene the Sacri-
18. fices of Mofes his law,& the fupper
Sacramentes arc on the Lordes of the Lord in the Chriftia churcli
behalfeteftimonies ofgrace&fal- 4.18.12.
uation,& on our bchalfe tokens of What the name of a Sacrifice
Ourprofc(Iion.4.i4.i9. properly fignifieth : and of the di-
The Sacramentes of the olde uerfe kindes of Sacrifices vnder the
Church vnder the lavvc; tended to lawc : v/hich may be dcuidcd into
/ PPPP lij
The Table.
two fortes , whereof feme may be but rather the manner of true con-^
called ofthankcrgiuinge5and other uerfion . The fame is to be faidof
fome propitiatory or of cleanfingc. certamc other places of Scripture.
4.18,13. 3-4v^^-
Our only propitiatory Sacrifice, An expofition of that place in
is the death of Chi ift. Sacrifices of the gofpei, Many /inner arc forgmen
thankcre;iuingwehaiie many,asall hery becat<fe [he hath loucd much:
theductJesofcharity,praiers,pr3i- Meaning that loue is not the caufc,
fcSjgiuinge ofthankes , and all that but the profc offorgiuencs.3.4.57
we do to the worfliipping of God, The olde wry ters of the church
418,15,16,17. did not fpeake of Satisfadions in
This maner ofSacrificing is dai- fuch fenfe as y papiftes do:for they :
Iv vfc'd in the church, & in the fup- vndciftoodc, that the penitent do
per of the Lord: And thereupon all make Saiisf.idion to the Church,
Chnftians are Sacrificing Prieftes. and not to God. 3.4.38,^9.
SamfaEfcns Pat>ipcalL Scripture , the Wcrde of God,
OfSat!sfa61;io,which tlieymakc and the authority
the third rhinge m penance, of re- thereof.
taininse the p.iine,the fault bcingc Men do not fufficiently knowc
forgiuen, & fuch like ]ies,which all God the crcator,and difcerne hioi
are ouerthrowen, by fetting againil from famed gods, by conHderation
the free forgiuenes of finncs,by the of his creatures.vnlcffe rhey be al-
namcofChnft.3.4.Z5. foholpcby thehghrof his Word.
A confutation of the blafphe- And God hath kept this order in
mous error of the fchoolcmen,that teaching them that be his, not on—
forgiuenes of finnes, and reconci- ly fince that he chcfc the lewes for
liationis once done in Baptifme, hi peculiar people, but alfo from
but after Baptifme , we muft rife a- the beginning,cuen toward Adam,
gaineby Satisfadions.3.4.z6. Noejand the other fathers. 1.6.1.
Bv fuch eircur, Chrift ts fpoyled Eitler by oracles , or by vi'jons,
ofhishdnor, &chc peace of con- orby theminiftery ofotherjthcfa-
fciencesistroubkd, forafmuch as thers had the Woide which they
they can nener certainly determine, were certainly pcrfwaded to be the
that their finnes are forgiuen them, word of God, whereby they knew
J. 4. 27. the true God the creator and go-
In Danieljwhen Nabuchadonc- uernour of ail things:which Word
feriscommaundedtorcdeemehis afterwarde , that he might pro-
finnes with ri^htcoufneffe , that uidc for men in all ages , hccaufcd
fame rcdcmingjis referred to God, to be written in the law & the Pro-
rather than to men , and the caufe phets,as it were inpublikc regifters,
of pardon is not there fet foorth, 1.6. z,^. in which place alfo js pro-
ucd
The Tabic.
ued by tcftimonies of Scripture , y ucnly kingdome,are fecondc helps
the dodrinc of the Word.muft be to ftablifn the crcdu of Scripture, i
ioyned to rhc confideratio oi crea- 8. i,i. 1 1.
tures , leaft we conceiue a fickle Alfo the antiquity of the Scrip-
knowledge ofGod. ture , whereas the bookcs of other
Of them which fay that the au- religions,afC later than the bookes
ihority of Scripture hangeth vpon of Mofes, which yet doth not him-
the iudgemcnt of tlie Church,& in felfe inuent a new God,but fettcth
how ill cafe we (hould be, if it were foorth to the Ifraelites, the God of
fo.i.7.1. their fathers. 1.8. 5,4.
This errour is well confuted by Whereas Mofes , doth not hide
the place of Paulc in the fccondc the fhame of Leuy his fatlier , nor
chapter to the Ephefiins,where he y murmuring of Aaro his brother,*
faith that the faithfullare builded and of Miiry his lifter, nor doth ad-
vpon the fimdation of the Apoftles uaunce his owne children;the fame
and Prophets, i .7. i. are argument$,that in his bookes is
Inwhatfenfe Auguftine fayeth, nothing fained by man. 1.8.4.
that hewoulde nothaue beleued Alio the miracles which happe-
ihe Gofpell , vnleffe the authority ned , as well at the publifliinge of
of the church did mouc him:which the lawcjasinall the reft of time, i
place they do cauilloufly wreft to 8.f.
the confirmation or their errour. i. Which miracles, when the pro-
7. 3 . phane writers could not deny, they
Although there be many other cauilled , that Mofes did them by
arguments, which do proue,yca,& Magical] artcs. Which fcl3under,t$
do enforce the wicked to confefle, confuted by mofl ftrong rcafons. i,
that the Scripture came from God: 8.6.
yet by none other meane, than by Alfo whereas Mofes fpeaking in
the fccretc teftimony of the holy the perfon of lacob , afligneth the
GhoftjOur hearts are iruely perfwa- gouernment to the tribe of luda,
dedthat itis God, whichfpcaketh and where he tclleth before of the
in y laWjin the prophetesj & in the callinge of the Gentiles , whereof
gofpel: And this is proued by many the one came to pafle fourc hun-
places of Efay. 1.7.4,5. dred yeares after, and the other al-
The orderly difpofition of the mofttwothoufandyearescthefeare
wifdom of Godjthe doftrinc fauo- argumcntes,that it is God himfelfc
ringenothingcofearth]inefle,thc which fpeaketh in the bookes of
goodly agreement of all the paries Mofes. i 8.7.
amongthcmfeluesi&fpecially that Whereas Efaytelleth before of
bafeneffe of contemptible wordes, the captiuity of the Iewes,and their
vttcringthehicmyftericsofyhca- reftormge by Cyrus (which was
PPPP iiij
The Tabic.
borne a hundred ycarcs after the ftlellkip , are figncs of y holy Ghoft
death of Efay ) and where Icrcmy fpeaking in them. 1.8.1 1.
before that the people was led a- The confentof fo many ages»of
way appointeth their exile to con- fofondry nation$,3nd of fo diueife
tinue three fcorc & ten yeres,whcr- mindes inembracinge the Scrip-
as leremy & Etechiell, being farrc cure , & the rare godlines of fonie>
diftant in places the one from the ought to ftabhihe the authorise
other, do agree in all their fayings: thereof ainong vs.i.8. 1 2.
where Darnell telleth before of Alfothe blood of fo many mar-
thingcs to come , for Hx hundred tyrs , which for the confcfficn
yeares after; thcfe are mof! certainc thereof, haue fuffercd death with a
proueSjCo ftabliih the authonty of conftanc and fober zcalc of God. i.
thebookcsof iheProphets.2.8.8. 8.ij. ,
Againft certaine vngodly fcof- Againft certaine phrcntike rrcn,
fers which aske how we know that which forfakinge the readfnge of
thofc arc the writinges of Mofes Scripture and learningejdo boaft of
and the Prophetes , which are red the Spinte,& do flic to reuelaiions.
intht'ir namcsrrsnd how weknowe 1.9.1,2.
that iherc was euer any fuch Mofes A confutation of their obicdio,
1.89, that It is not mete that the Spiritc
Alfo of them that askc, from ofGod,to whom all thinges ought
whence the copif s of the bookcs of to be fubied , fhoulde be Tubied to
the Scripture came to vSjforafmuch the Scripture. 1.9.2. "
as Antiochus commaudcd them all Aifo where they fay that we refl
to be burned. And there is fpokcn vpon the letter vyhichflaycth 1.9,
of the wonderfull Prouidenceof 3.
God in prcieruinge them fomany The Lorde hath ioyncd with a
a^cSjamong (o many enemies,and muiuall knot the certamecy of his
lb cruell perfecutions. 1.8.10. dodrine and of his fpirite. 1.9.5.
The (implicity of fpeeche of the Such as the beholding of thi; hca-
firft three Euang.hftcSj containmg ue & earth & other creatures doth
heauenly myfteries , the phrafe of dcpaint out God vnro vs,fuch doth
lohn thondering from on hie with the Scripture fct him foorth,that is
weighty fentcnccs, the heauenly tofay,eternal,fulofgoodncs,clemc
maiefty fhining in the writinges of cy,mercy,righteoufnes, iudgemenc
Peter and Paulc,thc fudden calling & trueth:and aifo to the fame end.
ofMathcwfro the boordc,thecal- 1.10.1,2.
linge of Peter and lohn from their What is to be thought of the po-
fiilicibotcs to the preaching of the wer of the church in expofition of
Gofpelljthr conuerlion and calling Scripture.4.9. 1 ^.
of Paulc beingc an enemy to Apo- The Romiih dodors do wrong-
' full/
The Tabic.
fully abufc this colour to the con- Againft the falfe imagination of
firmacion of their errors and bla- the Sophifters conccrnmg veniall
fphemics.4.9. 14. finnes.which they call de(ires with-
OfSmging in the Chmch, out a determined adent, which do
Voice and Singing aua»Ie no- not long reft in the hart; it is pro-
thing in prayer, without aftcdion ued chat cucry linnc,eueny lighted
of the harr.g.zo.^ij^j. defiicdeferucth dcath,andis dead-
Of y vfagc of Singing in Chur- ly . except in the fainds which ob-
ches.g. 20.32. tcine pardon by the mercy of God.
Single life, 2. 8. 5 8, 59.
Their fiumelerneC'c which 60 A confutation of their fondc
fct forth the comlinelie of Single difttndion betweenc deadly and
life for a thing necelhry , to the veniall finnes.and of their fdauder
great reprocheofy oldc Church, when they fay that we make ail
By what degrees ihis tyrar.y crcpce finnesegall.j 4.28.
in:o the Church : and howc it can Howe it is to be expoundcd,thal
nor be defended by the pretence of God vifitcth the iniquity of the Fa*
ccrt.-<inolde canons. 4.12.26,27,28. thers vpon the children vnto the
Pnefts were forbidden to marry third and fourth generation : and
by wicked tyranny.and agsinft the whether fuch reucngcmcnt be vn-
wordof God,andagainlt allequi- femcly for the righteoufnefle of
ty. 4. 12.25. God.2.8.19,20.
An aunfwer to the aduerfasies Sinnc againjl the holy Ghoji,
ohicction , that the pricfi muft by The true definition of Sinne a-
fome marke differ from the lay gainft the holy Ghoft , and cxaplcs
people. 4. 12.24. tlicrof out of the Scripture, j. 3. 22.
The bhilplicmy of the Pope, It is not one or an other parti-
faying that mAHage h dcfihng and ciilar falling, but a generall forfa-
vnclenncifc of the riclhc.4. 12.24. king,the delcription whereof is de-
It is fonde to defend the forbid- clared by the Apoftle. Neither is ic
ding of manage with the examples any maiucU if God will be alwaycs
of the Leuiticall Prierts,which whe vnnppeafablc to them thst haue (o
ihey fhovild go intociie fanduary fallen, 3. ^. 2^. forafmuch as he pro-
lac afunder fro their wiues. 4.12.2 j. mifeth pardon onely to them that
Sinne. repent,which they fliali neuer do.
A confutation of Platoes faying. And though the Scripture do fay
that men Sinne not but by igno- that fome fuch haue groned and
ranee : alfo of their opinion which cried , yet that was not repentance
fay that in all Smnes there is an ad- or conuerfion , but rather a blindc
Uffcd malice and fiowardaeffe.z. torment by defperation. 3.^. %4.
z.z2,2j,2j. OftheSoule»
The Tabic.
Tliat the Soulc or Spirit of man fay,thac the powers ofthcfoulc are
is not onely a breath , but an im- -vnderftanding and wilhand the of-
niortall fubftauce, although it were fice and force of cither of them ia
created , is proued by confcience, mans firft eftate. 1. 1 ^.7,8,
by the knowledge of God , and by That there yet remainc th fome-
fo many excellent giftes wherewith what of the leede of religion yec
the mmde of man is endued , yea, emprinted euen in the corruption
and by thofc things which it con- of the foule. 1.15.6.
cciuethinflecpe,andalfoby many Of their error which thought
argumecs taken out of the fcripturc. that whole man perilTitth by death,
i.i j.z.Finally by this that it is Paid, and that the foules at the laft (hall
that man was created after y image rifcagaine with the bodies. ^.z^. 6.-
of God.Scd. J. Of the ftaic of foules from death
Againft them that vnder the CO- to the bft day. 5.15.6.
lour of Nature do dcnie the pro- A dcfcripiion taken out of Bcr-
uidencc and gouernauncc of God nard,ofthe miferiesofa faithful!
vttering it felfe in the maruellous foule, being conHdcred as it is in
& in a maner innumerable powers it felfe and of it filfe : and on the
of the Soulc. I. f 4,5. other fide, of thcaflured glorying
A confutation of the crrour of of afaithfull foule in Chnfl, which
the Manichees and of Scruetto, blottcihoutallhervnworthineffes.
that the Soulc is a deriuation of 3.»>if.
the fubftaunceofGod:alfoofthc Suferfiition.
error of Ofiandcr, which acknow- The fimplicitie of the fupcrfti-
ledgeth no image of God in man tious doth not excufe them , be-
without an eflcntiall rigbteoufnes. caufe their blindenelTc is found to
1. 1 5.5, be mingled with vanitie^pridcjand
Concerning the immortalitic of obftinacie. 14. i,^*
the Soule , in a maner none of the When fuperftition goth about
Philofophers hath certainly fpol e: to plcafeGod,it mocketh him with
but they do bind the powers therof lying colours. 1.4.3.
to this prefent life , whereas the The fuperftitious do nor ap-
Scripture doth fo geue to it the procbc vnto God but againft their
chiefe rule in gouernauncc of life, will and with feruile fearc. 1.4.4.
that it alfo ftirreth vp man to the Whofoeuer do corrupt the true
wor(hipping of God. Alfo of the rcHgion , although they followc
diuerlityofSoulcSj&ofthedeuifio the confent of antiquitie or the
of the powers of the foule accor- cuftome of any citic , yet they de-
ding to the PIiilofophers.i.iy.6. part from the one and true God.
An other diuifion more agreablc i. j. i z,
withChriftian dodrinc , that is to It is prouci by the etimologie
9f
The Table.
of tlic wor(3cs Superpmon, J^eligicn^ guftine : and in what fcnfc Augu-
Z^/f^e/dorgodlincflejwhatdifre- itinefaid ,that inbcleuing wccatc
rcnceis betwene Religion and (ii- thcfle(hcofChrift.4.i7.^.
perdition. I. II. I. They do not fay enough,which
The craft of fupcrftition, when pafling ouer the mention of fleftic
grauming the chicfe place to the and blood, do thinkc that wcarc
one God, it bcfetteth him with a made pertakers onclyof the fpiric
route of fmailer gods. 1. 1 2. i, j. of Chrift. The mifterie of the Sup-
Supfer of the Lorde. per is fo great,that neither the toge
Of the bread & wine the (tgncs can expreffe with fpeaking,nor the
in the holy Supper : and it is decla hartc comprched with thinking the
ired by his owne wordes at his Sup- greatneffc thereof.4. 17.7.
p-^r , v^hy the Lorde willed that wc Howe farre the pierfedcommu-
fhould vfe them. 4. 17. i. nicating of Chrift extedeth.Wherc
We gather a great fruit of con- is declared that Chrift , which
fidenceand fwetenelle out of thij from the beginning was the lifc-
facrament,which teftifieih that we geuing word of the father, made
are fo growen together into one the fleftie which he tokc vpon
body with Chrift , that whaf foeuer him to be alfo lifegcuing to vs. 4.
is hiSjWe may lawfully call it oures, 17.8,9.
4.17.2. . The faith full do truely cate of
This is declared by the wordes the fame flelhc howe great diftance
oftheSupper.4.17. 5. of places foeuer there be bctwcne
The chicfe office of the facra- them and it. 4. 17.10.
ments is not to geuc vnto vs the The miftery of the Supper con-
body of Chrift without any hier fifteth of two things, the bodily
confideration, but rather to feale G^ncs ^ and the fpirituall truth:
that promife wherein he reftifieth Which fpirituall truth conteincth
that his flcftj is verely me:!tc.4.i7.4. three things , fignificaiion , matter^
The Supper makcth not Chrift and cffcd.4. 17. 1 1.
then firft to begin to be the bred of Of the tranfubftatiation of bred
life,but that wc lliould felc y force and wine into the body and blood
of that bred. He once gaue his flelTi of Chrift, which the craftefmen of
for the life of the world , and daily the court of Rome hauc forged. 4.
geueth ittothemthat be his. Wc I7.i2ji^,&c.and 20.
muft beware that we do not to They are without tcftimonie of
much abacc or aduailce thefignes. antiquitie. And in what fcnfc the
The eating of the fleftic of Chrift olde writers faid that in the confc-
is not faith , but rather the cft'cd of crntion is made a fccrct turning.
f3ith.4 17.5. Alfo the fignification of the Supper
So thought Chrifoftomc and Aur a§rceth not , vnleflc the fubftance
The Tabic.
of the outwardc figncs rcmainc. 18,19,^1.
4. 17. 14. Of the cxpofition of the wordcs
The brcade is a Sacrament to of ChrilHn the Supper.4. 17.20^11.
none but to me to whom the word The body of Chrift is contcined
isdircded. And here are confuted in quantity, and comprehended in
ccrtainc arguments of the teachers heauen , vntill the laft day , as it is
of tranfubftantiation.4.i7.i J. proued by thefcriptures.4.T7.z6,i7.
Of fomc men , which though Of the papiftcs carnall adora-
tbey do at one word graunt that tion,and concomitancejand confe-^
the fubftancc of the figncs remai- cration of the hoft (as they call ic)
ncth,yet placing the body of Chrift and carrying it about in pompc. 4.
inbread and vnder bread , they fall i7-5S>S^>37'
backe into the locall prcfcnce , and The miftery of y Supper ought
faine a being euery where. 4.17. i^, to ftirre vs vp to geuing of thankes,
17,18,20. to cxercife vs in remcmbring the
A confutation of their cbie6li6s. death of Chrift, to kindle vs to
4.i7.*i,22,2g;&c. holineffe of life , and chicfcly to
It is proued that this dodrine is charity.4 17. 57,38.
not maintcined,neither by the te- In the papacie the Supper (the
fiimonies of Auguftine , nor by au- trewc miniftration whereof is not
thoritie of Scripture. 4. 17. i8,ip, without the word) is turned into a
50,51. dumme aftion. And here is fpokcn
'- A confutation of ccrtainc other of the laying vp of the Sacrament
of their obiedions , and chiefely of to be extraordinarily deftributed to
this that they fay , that whatfoeuer ficke men.4. 17.59.
wc teache of fpirituali eating , is The dodrinc of the papiftes,
againft the trewc and reall eatmg: whc they go about to prepare men
where alfo is declared that y body to the worthineflfc of eating the
of Chrift is in the Supper offered body of Chrift, doth in cruell wife
to the infidels , but they receiue it torment c6fciences:And the deuell
not4.17.55. could not by any readier wayde^
hJeither can the faying of Augu- ftroy men. Of the beft remedie to
ftinc be drawen to this purpofe,that auoidc this dcftrudion. They erre
the Sacraments are nothing appai- which in the Supper do require of
red by the infidelitic of men.Which the faithful! perfedion of faith. 4.
is proued by diuerfc other tefti- 17.41,42.
monies of the fame man.4.17. 54. As touching the outward vfage
Howe the body and blood of of the miniftration of the Supper,
Chrift is gcucn to vs in the Supper, there are many things indifferent:
& what maner of prefence of Chrift And how it ought to be ininiftrcd
wc ought to holdc therein. 4.17. moftcomcly.4. 17.45.
Of
The Tabic.
OfthefinallaflTemblyatthisday ping of God : And therefore vee
<t y pertaking of the Suppcr,which mull beware that our othcs cotcinc
is a token of contempt, wherewith not any difhonor to the name of
the holy fathers in olde time were God,which is done in Forfwearing:
much difpleafed : And howc the oranycotempt of it,which is done
cuftome which commaundcth men in fupcrfluous othcs, or in which
to communicate once cucryycare, the name ofany other tha of God
was a moft certaine inuention of is vfed.z 8.15,24,1^.
the dcuell.4.17. 44,45,46. It is prouedby Scripture againft
It is proued by authority of the the Anabaptiftes , that all othes arc
Scripture and bythevfage of the not forbidden vs,and that Chrift in
olde Churchjfoure hundred yeares the Gofpell chaungcd notliing as
before the death of Gregoric , and touching tiie rule of Swearing , fee
by many other argumentSjihat the forth in the lawe. z.8.26. Which is
coftitution which toke away from proued by his owne example : and
lay men the cup of the Lorde,came not onely publike, but alfo priuatc
out of the deueU workfnop. 4. 17. othes are permittcd,kepingthe mo-
47,48.4^,50. deration which the lawe comaua-
Of the concomitance of the deth.2.8.27.
blood in the flefa of Chrift, which T. ..
is a popifhe inuention.4. 17.47. Temples.
The Supper of the Lorde is pro- /^^ Temples of Chriftian men
fanely abufcd , if it be geuen to a]^ Vy for aflfemblics of the congre-
men without chojfe. Oi the duty of gaiion.g.20.50.
muiiftcrs in reiediag trie vnwoithy. It is proued by the authority of
4. 1 2. 5. the olde Church , and the reafonf
A briefe fumme of thofc things of Auguftine ,that it is not cxpc-
whith we oughtto knowe concer- dient , that there Ihould be any
ning the two Sacraments. And why images in Chnlhan temples.i.ii.ij,
the Supper is oftentimes mmiflred. The preaching of the word and
and Baptifme but once.4. 18. 19. '^^ Sacraments , are Iiueiy images
Svccaringe. which onely are fit to be in Chri-
An expoficion of the thirdeco- ftian Temples. 1.11.7,15.
maundcmentjin which thefe three The wickednes of the Nicene
things are cotcincdjthat wc neither Synode which was holden by the
think nor fpeakc any thing of God, commaundcmcnt of Irene the Em-
nor of his word and honorable mi- prefle,and the filthy follies thereof
fteries,nor yet ofany of his workes, in allowing', images in Temple$,and
othcrwifc than reucrently.2 8.22. the worfliippingof them. 1. 11. 14,
A definition of Swe3ring:wherc 15,16.
is declared y it is a kmdc of worfhip- Of the garnilhing of Temples
The Tabic.
& holy things in the olde Church, free mercy of God.Thc third point
4.4.8.&4.5.18. isthacthe cOuenantot the fathers
Temftations. with God , did then rtandc vpon
Of diuerfe kindes of Tcmpta- hkc knowledge of Chrifl the Mc-
tions.'andmwhacfcnfeitisfaidthac diator.z.io,4.
Godtcmptethvs.5.io.46. Alfo »n fignification of Sacra-
Tcfiainentioide , and nerve. ments, the Ilraeliccs vndcr the lawc
Of the hkenelfe of the oldc and were egall with y Chrilhan people.
ncwcTeftamet.'Whcre is declared, 2.10.5,6.
that they arc all one in fubrtance There arc foure differences of
and matter , but onely do differ m the olde Tcftamcnt from the ncwc,
miniftration. The likenes ftandeth wherunto we may alio addc a fifth.
chicfcly in three pointes. z. 10. 1,2. The firit is , that althoui^h in the
•The tirlt point is , that the oldc olde time alfo the Lordcs will was
Teftamet did not holde the farhers to direde the foules of his people
in earthly fchcitie » but had cbiefe to the heauenly mheritaunce : Yet
regard to the hfc to come. Which totheendethattbey mighibcihc
is proued by Paule,which faith that better nourilhed in y hope therot,
the promifes of the Gofpell arc he gaue it them to be beholden,
comeincd vnderit.2.10.}. and after a certainc maner tafted
The fame alfo is proued by the vnder earthly benefites : But nowc
Jawc and the Prophets: Firft, by thegraceof the life to come, being
^on(idenng the woi dcs of the co- more clerely reuelcd by y Golpdl,
uenaunt : I amyour Gotf.i. 10.7,8, hee dire<fteth our mindes y {freight
Againc ,lw/i^ be the God of your way to the meditation thereof,lea-
fecde after you : Sed.p. Alio by the uing the inferior maner of cxerci-
life of the holy fathers, as Adam, fing which he vfcdamong thcif-
AbelUNoCjSed.io.Abraham^Sec. raehtes.z. ii.i.
ii.Ifaak,lacob.Se<ft. 12,1^,14 And Therforey oldc Church iscom-
by many teftimonies of Dauid.Sec. pared to an hen e vnder age, which
15, 16.17,18. Of lob. Scd. i^. Gc- isgoucrnedbyCardians.i.n 2.
nerally of all the latter Prophets. For this reafon , the fathers (o
Sed.20. But namely of Ezechiell. much-eft; cmed this hfe,and the
SeCt.21.OfEfaycandDan1cll.Scd. bleffings thcreof.2.11.5.
ii. A conclufion of this point with The fecond difference is in fi-
rchearlingc certainc rcftimonies gures,wher e with the olde ttftamec
out of the ncwc Teftament. S^Qi. did fhcwe forth the image and
2^. fhadowe of fpirituall good things:
The fcconde point is that the The new teftamet ceueth ihe prc-
olde Teftamet did not ftande vpon fent truth and pcrfed body.Therc
the meritesof mcn>butvponthc is alfo a teafon {hewed why the
Lordc
The Tabic.
Lordc kept this orcfcr : And a dcfi- callii)g of the Genci!cs,is 4 ccrcaine
nition of the oldc teftament.z.ii.4. ligne,whcrewith the excellcncicoC
In this fenfc it is faid, that the the newc tcftamcnt is fct foorth
lewcs were by the mtrodudion or aboue y oldcra thing fo incredible,
fcholmg of tiic Jaw led vnco Chrift. that it feemcd yet newe to the A*
before that he was dchuercd in the poltlcs themfc]ues,being exercifcd
fleihe : 1. 1 1. 5. which appeared in in reading of the Prophet$,and en-
the moft excellent Prophets that ducdwjth the holy Ghoft.i.ii.ii,iz,
were endued with lingular grace of A conclufion of this matter,and
the fpirit.Sed.6. an aunfwere to diuers obiedions oi
The thirds difference , is taken fome me,which fay that this varic-
outof the one and thirty chapter ty in the Church,this diuers mancr
of Iereniy,and the thirdc chapter of of teaching/o great change oivfit'
the feconde Epiftlctoihe Corin- gcs and ceremonies , is a great ab-
thians, that the oldc teftament is furditie.Wherc is declared that the
literal!, and the newe tcftamentis conftancy of Godappcarcthinthis
fpintuall ; the olde bringeth death, chaunging , and he hath done no-
the new is the inlUument of hfc. z. thing but wifely, righteoully , and
11.7,8, in mercy , when he gouerneth his
The fourth diflR^rence is,that the Church , after one forte in childe-
fcripture calleth the olde tcftariienc, bode, & after an other fort in riper
the tcilament of bondage, bycaufe age,& alfo when he did kecpe ciofc
it cn^cdreth feare in mens mindes: in one people the (hewing forth of
but the newc is called the Tefla- his grace before the comming of
mcnt of liberty , bycaufe it raifeth Chrift,whicH afterward he poured
them vp to confidence and furcty. forth vpon all nations.2. 1 1. 1 5,14.
The three latter differences are CO* Theft.
parifons of the lawc and the Gofpcl. An expolirion of the 8. Com-
1 he firft, contemeth alfb the pro- maundement : where is entreated
mifes made before the lawc. The of diuerfe kindts of Thcftes , and
fathers liued fo vnder the lawe and fome which although me ludgco-
the olde telbment,that they flayed therwife, yet are accoptcd Theftes
not there, but alwayes afpired to before God: And fohe thatdoth
the newcyea and embraced a cer- not perforrne that which by the
tainccomunicatingtherof z.ii.9,10 office of his cdimg he oweth to
The fifth difference is , that be- othcr,is a Thcfe. 2.8.45.
fore the commini^ of Chrift, the What we ought to do, that wc
Lordc had feucrcd one nation > in may obey this commaundemcnt,is
which he would kepe the couenat {hewed by diuerfe examples accor-
of his grace, in the meanc time nc- ding to the diucrfity of pcrfons and
glcdting all other nations. So the ofiices.1.8.46.
The Table.
Traditions. Traditions, wherewith the Church
Forafmuch as the Lordc,willing hath heretofore bene opprefl'ed.
to teache a rule oftrewe righteoul- 4.10.18,19,20.
nefle , hath drawen all the partes The example of the Apoftlcs,
thereof to his ownc will.thercby it when they commaunded rhe Gea-
appearethithatali rhe good workes tiles loabfteinefrom things offered
which men deuife of their owne vntoldois,fromftraglcdjandfiom ,J
wittes , are nothing worth before blood , is falfely alledged to excufc 1
him: But the trcwe worfhippmg the tyranny of the popes iawes. 4. '
ftandcth vpon obtdience onely, 10.21,22,
which IS the begmning,mothcr,3nd The Lordcs kingdome is taken i
prefcruerofaUverrues.2.8.^. fromhimjwhenhc is worfnipped
Of Traditions of men, that is to with the lavMCS of mennes Tradi-
fay, ordinaunce-s procedmg from tionsrwhich is proued by examples
men , concerning the worfliipping and telhmonies of Scripture , to
of God: Andof the vngodlmeife haue aJway bene a moft hainons
and nectflitic of them. 4. 10. i, 2, otfence in ihe (ight of God. 4. 10.
5,6,7,8. 25,24.
A diuifion of popiflie conftitu- The inuentions ofmen can not
tions, which they call Traditions of be defended by the example of'
the Church, into fuchasconteine Menoha, which being a priuate ma
ceremonies > and other which are offered facrificc , nor of Samuel '
faid to pertcme to difciphne. The which facrififcd inRamath,4.io.25,
wickcdnclfe of both forteSjbycaufe nor of Cluift, which willed men to
they place the worlhip of God m bcare the burdens that the Scnbes
them , and confcienccs are boundc and Pharifees did binde together,
withprecifeneceility of tl e.4.109. 4.10.26.
For them the commaundement Of holy & profitable ordinances
ofGod is made voide. 4.10.10. of the Church, and the ende that
A trewe marke of mens Tradi- they tcnde vnro.4. 10. i.
tions , which ought to be reiedcd Of fuch ordiaaces of the Church,
of the Church , and of all Godly as ought to be accompted holy,
men. 4. 10 \6. namely thofe which ierue for com*
A confutation of the pretence hneHcjOrdo preferuc order and
which fome men vie that defcnde peace in the Church. 4. ^o. 27, 28>
popifhe Traditions to be of God, 29.We muft wifely con(ider,which
bycaufc the Church cannot erre, be of that forte.4.!0. ^o.
and IS gouerncd by the holy Ghoft. It is the duty of Chriftia people,
4. TO. 17. to obferue fuch ordinances : And
• It is a mcerc mockery to fay,that what errors herein are to be taken
the Apoftlcs were authors of the hcedc of: And howc in the meanc
time.
The Tabic.
timf , the libcrtic of confciences father from the Wordcand of the
may Hill be prcfcrued fafc. 4. 10. Word from the fpiric.i.ij.17.
jijgi. AJfoin the fcripture there is a
Tributes, diftindion made of the fathcr,from
Of Tribiitcs,Taxcs,Impofiiio5, the Word and the fpiritjand of the
and Finances, which arc payed to fpiritfrgm tliem both , as well by
Princes: And howe Princes may obferuatioof order,asby prophc-
vfc them with a good confciencc. cies afcribcd to them.i.15.18.
4.i0.ij. Thisdiftinc^ionof perfonsma-
Trlnitie. keth not againft the moft (imple
In one fimple cffcncc of God, vnitie of God. 1.1^19.
we muft diftindly confider three In what fenfe the fathers fayjth at
pcrfons , or (as the Gtekes call the father is the beginning of the
them) Hypojiafes.i. i j.i. fonnci and yet that the fonne hath
A confutation of them which in hise(Ien'ccofhimfelfe.i.i3.i9.
this matter do condcmne the name A breife fumme of thofe things
of perfon,andreicd itfornevyc- which we ought to bcleue concer-
uefle. 1.1^.^,4,5. "'"? the one eflence of God and
The holydodorshauc bin com- the three pcrfons.!. 15. 20.
pclled to inuente certaine newe And herein we muftdifpute fo-
wordsjto defende the truth of God berly, and with great moderation,
againft certaine fubtle men, which that neither our thought , nor our
mocked it out with fliifting : As tong,do pafTe beyond the boundcs
againft Arrius they inuented this ofthe wordof God.i.ig.zi.
word^owoo^/roKConfubftatjalljand A confutaD5 of the doting errors
againft Sabellius the name of three of Seructtus in this point of do-
propcrties or perfons. i.ig.4,16. drine. 1.15 iz.
The diuerfe fentences of Hie- A confutation, of the error of
rome,Hilarie,and Auguftine,in the certaine lewde men,which fay,that
?fe of thefe wordes.i.i^.^. the father is trewly and properly
What we call a perfon.whcn we the one only God,which in making
entreatc of the Trinitie.i. 1 5.6. the fonne ond the holy Ghoft, did
Of the error of Seruettus, in the poure his Godhed into the.i.ig.i j.
Cakingof this word Perfon.i.i^.zz. It is faUe which they fay, that
As God hath more cierely ope- when mention is made of God in
ncd himfclfe by the comming of the fcripture , oncly the father is
Chrift,fo he is fince that time more meant thereby. 1.1^.24.
familiarly made knowcn in y three Alfo it is falfe which they dreame
perfons.i.15.16. ofvndeuided fubftanccs , of which
Teftimonies of fcripturcjwhcrc- cueryone hath a parte of thccf-
by is {hewed the diftindion of the fcncci.i^.zf.
The Table.
An aunfwcrc to their obieflion, the exprcflc word of Godrwhcthcr
that Chrift,if he be properly God, they may well be Vowed of Chri-
is wrongfully called the fonnc of itian men, and howc they are to be
God. 1.15.26. cftccmed.4. ij.i,6.
An aunfwerc to many phces Three things are to be confidc-
which they bringc out of Irencus red in Vowes : Who it is to whom
for profc of their opinion , where wee Vowej namely God which dc-
he aftirmeth the father of Cl.rift to licethin obedience. 4. ij. z. Who
be the one oncly and ctcrnall God we be that do Vowe, that we mea-
ofIfraci.i.ig.z7. fure our ownc ftrength and lokc
A Ifo to tne places of Tcrtullian. vpon our Gilling , that wc ncglc<fl
Sed.28. not the benefitc of liberty which
ItisproucdthatluftincHilaric, God hath gcucn vs. Scd. j. And
and Auguftinc, do make of our with what mmde we Vowe. Seft.4.
fide. 1.1 5.29. Of the Priefts , Monkes , and
The Sonne is of the fame Tub- Nonnes Vowe of finglc life. 4. i j.
ftaunce with the father.4.8.16. 3^'75»8,»9.^
V. There be fourc endes of Vowes,
Lafi ynEfion,Ai they call it. twohaue rcfped to the time part,
WHat maner of adminiftratio and two to the time to come. 4. 13.
isofthcpopifhelaftVndio, 4,5.
and in what forme of wordes : And There is one common Vowe of
howc it can not be defended by the all the faithfull which they make
authority of lames, or by the exa- inBaptifme.4.1 j.6.
pic of the Apoftles.4.19.18. Of the ralheneffe and fupcrfti'
Forafmuch as the grace of hea- tion of the worlde in making of
ling which was in olde time gcucn Vowcs.4.ij.i,7.
to y Apoftles,haih long ago ceafled W.
in the Church. Sed. 19, 20. And Of Vf^arres.
though it ftill remained, yet this Warres are lawfuU.whcn Magr-
their wicked obferuation is farrc ftrates arc driuen of ncceflity to
from that holy ceremony of the take weapon in hand , to execute
Apoftles.A declaration of the bla- pubhke reuenge vpon thofe'that
fphemifsthereof, when they con- trouble the peace of their domi«
iurc the oilc, and afcribc vnto it nion, whether they be ciuilc or fo-
thpt which is proprc to the holy rcincenemies.4.20.11.
Ghoft.4.ip.2i. It makcth not to the contrary
Vocation, hereof , which many alledgc , that
See Callinge. I there is not in the ncwc Teilament
Vowes. any teftimony or example which
0£Vov;c5 which arc made againft proucth that Warrc is a thing law-
full
The Tabic.
full for Chrjftians. But Magiftratcs voluntary . Which is proucd by
ought to take great heedc , that in Auguftine andBernarde. A large
taking of weapon in hand , they declaration oi the difference be-
nothmg at all followe their ownc twene compulfion and ncceiritic.
luftes. As VVarrc , fo garifons alfo, 2-?.f •
leagues and ciuile fortifications, are Sith the Lorde both bcginneth
things lawfull for Chnftians to vfc. and perfitcth good in our hartes,
4.ZO.I2. lithhe workcth in v$ iowill,thati$
f^f^iU of God. to fay the good will , fith he crea-
Of the fecret Will of God. Alfo tcth a newe hartc , taketh away the
of an other Will, whcreunto aunf- ftony harte and geueth a flefhly
wereth Willing obedience, j. 20. harr, it foUoweth, that the Will of
43.and5 24.1,7. man is vttcrly corrupted and hath
yyillof Man. no goodncfl'e at all.i. ^.6.
Whether the Will of man be It is clerely proued by rcafons
in cuery part through defiled and and diuerfc teftimonics of Scrip-
corrupted fo that it bringeth forth turcjthat God worketh goodwill
nothing but cucll: Or whether it in them that be his, not onely in
yet reteinefome liberty of choife. preparing or turning them from
Where is declared the common the beginning fo as it may after-
faying taken out of the Philolo- ward do fome good of it felfe : But
phers jthatall thingcs by natuiall bycaufc it is hisoncly worke that
difpofitiocouct that which is good. Will concciucth a loue of good-
And there is (hewed that the h- ncfre,thatitiscnclined tothcftudy
berty of Will can not be proued thereof, that it is ftirred and mo-
thcreby.2.1.26. ued to an endcuourto followe it,
The foule hath not onely a andagaine that the choife, ftudic,
weakc power but no power at all and cndeuour do not faintc, but
of it felfc to afpire to goodneffe, procede to efFcd, finally that man
And fith -the w1k>1c man is fubicft goeth conftantly forward in them
to the dominion of finnc, it is pro- and continucth to the cndc. 2. j.
ued by teftimonies of Scripture and 7,8,9.
of AuguftinCjthatthe WiUofman Therefore it is proued by the
is bound with moft ftrcight bodes, authority of Scripture and of Au-
2.2.27. guftine that tl-is which hath bene
Man by his fall loft not his will, taught thcfe many aees , that God
but the foundnefle of his Will , fo fo mouech our Wjll,that it is after-
that he cannot moue , much leflc ward in our ownc choife , ro obey
apply himfelfe to goodnefl'e, but is or difobey his motion , and other
nccclfarily drawen or led into euell, like fayings are vtterly falfc 2. j. 10,
howbcic not by compulfioo but 11,12,13,14.
Q.CLQCL ij
The Tabic.
Al(b in doingcs,which of them- with fomc Vnclcanncs of the fleih >
fclues arc'neither righteous nor and therefore damnable.Moreouer
vnrighteouSjand beloiige rather to ahhough they coulde bringe forth
the bodily than the fpirituall life, any fuch Workc,yet one imnc is
the will of man is not free j but by enough to blot out the remem-
the fpcciall motion of God is en- brance of all former righteoufncf,
clined to clemency , mercy, wrath, j. 14.9, (o,i i.
fearc, and other diuerfeeff.dions, A confutation of the papiftes
whenitpleafeth him to make way (hiftes concerning the righteouf-
for bis prouidencc. Which is pro- nefle of Workes : And fpecially of
ucd by Scripture, by daily expc- the fame horrible mofter of Works
ricnce,and by the authority of Au- of fupcrcrogatio. 5. 14. 1 2, 1 5, 14, i j,
guftine.z.4.6,7. When we cntreatc of Workes,
Workes, we muft thruft two peftilenccs out
A comparifon of the purenefle of our mindes : that we put no truft
of God with all the nghtcoufneflc in the righteoufneflc of our ownc
of men 5.12.4,5. Workes, and that wc afcribe no
Al the offprmg of Adam being glory vnro them.j.14.16.
deuidedintofourekindesof men. The Scripture fctteth out and
it is proued that they haue no holi- declareth fourc kindes of caufes in
nelfc or rightcoufnes:Firft in them ftablifhing our faluation : And it is
which are endued with no know- proued chat in them all there is no
ledge of God, in whom although rcgardof Workes.3.14.17.
there do fometime appeare excel- Where fometimc the fain<fles do
lent qualities (which are the giftes boldcn thcmfelues with rcmem-
of God) yet there is in them no- brance oftheir ownc innocence and
thing pure. 5. 14. 1,2, 5,4,5,6. vprightncflc : howc the fame is to
The fame is fhewed in them, be taken; and howc it doth in no
which being profefTed by Sacra- wife abate any thing from the free
mentSjare Chriftias onely in name, righteoufneflc in Chrift. -j. 14. 18,
denying God m their deedes:Alfo 19,20.
in hypocrites which with vaine falfc Where the Scripture faith that
colours do hide the wickedncfleof the good Works of the faithfull do
their heart, j, 14,7,8. moue God to do them good , the
Finally > it is proued that cucn order is therein rather cxprelfed
the children of God trewly rcge- than the caufe. 5. 14.21.
nerated by his Spinc,can not ftande Why the Lorde in the Scripture
by any rightcoufncs of their owne calleth good Workes ourcs , and
Workes before the iudgement of promifcth rcwarde tothem.j.ij.j,
Godjbecaufe they can bringe forth A confutation of the Sophi-
no good W^orke y is not fprinkled ftcrs inucntion , concerning morall
Workes,
The Tabic.
Workes , whereby men be made wherein yfcripturegeueth to good
acceptable to God, before that Workes thenameofnghteoulnes.
they be grafted in Chrift. 3. i j. 6. And there is fliewed that thofe pla-
sind 17.4. CCS arc not againftthe dodrine of
Thofe revvardcs arcgeuento the iuftification of faith. 5.17.7.
Workes of the faithful!, which the One good Worke or many do
Lorde in his lawe hath promifcd notfufficc for nghteoufnclTc be-
to the followers of nghteoufnefle: fore God, although one finnc fuf*-
but thereof there are three caufes ficc to condemne. And here the
to be confidered. 3. 17. ^. principle hath no place » the con-
We may note in the fcripture two traries haue all one rulc.5.18. 10.
acceptances of man with God , of Why the Lorde faid that he ren-
which the latter although it haue dreth to Workes that which hcc
refped to the good Workes of the had freely geuen before Workes.
faithful,yct is alfo of the free mercy 5. 18. 3. And therein he helpcth our
<)fGod.j.i7.4,5. weakcncfle leaft we (hould bcdif-
When it is faid that God doth couraged.5.18 4,6,7.
good to them that loue him , here Hereuppon hangeth the rightc-
is not rehearfed a caufe why he oufnesof the good Workes which
(hould do them good, but rather the faithfuU do,that bypardothey
ihcmanerofwhat forte they be by are allowed of God.3. 18. 5.
his grace. 5.17.6. yyorlde.
*- An expofition of ccrtaine places See Creation of the y/orld,
THE ENDE OF THE TABLE.
TO THE CHRISTIAN AND
STVDIOVS READERS OF
.THIS BOOK £3 AVGVSTINE
Marlorate Wiflheth Health.
iHo/o emr fhaUreade and fertife thefe two Tables follomng^
I and ejpecUUy the latter ymay marueli what I meant (after fo
many imprefjions and correEfions of this workf) to coUcSi and
J gather all the places of holy fcripture therein alledged : and 4
great parte of the authorities therein expounded , wheareas if
anyfrute orprojft thereof were to be had^the fame longe be-
fore might haue bene done.-and ej^ecially about there y cores paf, when the att-
iherhimfelfe wasfo diligent thgrcin : who bejtdet the many and profitable ad^
The Preface.
ihions (vfhkh it contemeth ) he himfelfe fetting the fame in order , with his
orvne handes , and reducing it to a mofl exaSfeferfeStion , did thenfet andpU'
blifhe it forth , in fuch forte , that inforver bool^s being deuided into chapters
and diuerfe feStions , he hath right tvorthefy andinfamilier manery comprifed-
thefumme of the whole Chrifiian religion.^nd ccrtaincly 1 cannot denie but it
Vffoulde haue bene very good and commodiofe , if that any one man n' ould haue'
t J{en the paine, faithfully and trewly to haue colleSfedthofe placcs:rvhich thing
1 thought ones to haue donne by the aduife of the imprinter jfauing that my
chardge and ojfce did elfe where call me : as alfo when I hadperufed andfet it
in an other order then it rvas before , and had euenfinifhed it, I ■wa4 compelled
to omit it , or at the leaf ^ to fmcefe for the time. Jind after that this booke
beingpm forth both in Latine and French,rvaifet tofale in euery place ^becaufe
Ifawe no man^ who then did take thepaine^to reduce the places of Scripture to
a Table , and vnderjlanding home profitable the fame would be to all men : t
could not choofe but after my power ^ and as leafare ferued in thofe trouble fome
times.to employ my whole care ^ traueli therein.j^nd becatife all things jhould
be done and come forth more certainc a?id in better order : I would notgeue
credite , nor truflto the mtmbers which the imprinter had before fet and madei
for when 1 had diligently conferred them all^ 1 found manyfalfe^ many omitted^
And fome dtfrderly fet :Andfurely that happeneth very fane to fuch as are not
befi fkilfuliin examining and perufing the places of holy Scripture to be f one
dcceaued.f^f^herefore all things dilig'etly refiorcd^^thatfltpplicd which femed
to wantyl didfo order the places of Scripture colleSfed out of theolde andnewe
tejiamentythat if there were any,throtigh forgetfulneffe,or by any othtr mcanes
omitted or oucrf flipped : (as it can not be but that in a great haruef} fome one
eare ofcorne [hall efcape the reapers handc) I durfl warrant fo fcwe (hall be
foundythat this Table being brought to triallyoufhall mtfinde one much more
plentiful! or larger . ISljucrtheleffe I do pray and requefl the readers \ that -if
they dofinde any^they willaduertife the imprinterywherby the fame may better
be examined and correSfed. ^nd this is to be noted, that fuch whole verfes as
1 haue comprifed in this table , they were not wholy but in part alleged , much
leffe expjundcd in the Infiituiion : which thing 1 did vpon good confideration,
Vor oftentimes it happeneth that in diuerfe places of the Infiitutions yfome au-
thorities are alleged , which are proued but by fome part of the verfe. jind be^
taufe in noting the places and numbcrsywe mufiyfe repetitions (which for the
ntofi part bring a lotbfomncffe to the reader^ 1 thought it better to put in the
whole verfe , then by often diuifons , to yfe vaine and fuperfluot4s repetitions,
Jfnd as concerning the commoditie which the reader may gather by this my
trauell: (befides that which by vfe and experience I am taught by thofe Ta'
bles , which for mine owne priuate fludy and exercife 1 wrote vpon the Infiitu^
tions heretofore fet forth) I dnrjito ajfrme this much , that they which are not
txenifed J
The Preface,
txerdfcdin entreating the holy ScriptUYes,andyct deJtrotM toferue theChurch
ofGodjdo diligently endeuor themfelues thereimto^they fh all find e a large and
AplaJne wayybcth with dexteritie to expound the wrhinges of the Prof hets and
u^pofiles, ai alfo aptly to apply the authorities here alleged^ andfuch lil^e to the
gdifying of the Church , which is the very ende of the whole, ^nd although we
want not good Commentaries to d^fcouer vnto vs the natural! fenfc of the Scrips
turey rvhich we do norve Jiitdy and apply :yet becanfe they who wrote the fame,
and who with goodfucce/fe hatte traucUed therein , were contented with the
plaine andjincere c.xpofition of the text : none could tell by the -vfe ofthefaid
Commentaries cnely ( xmlcffe they were wellpraSfifed in the principals of re-
ligion) horve and to what commonplace they ought to apply the argument then
in handc. Btu who fo can be contented to vfe thii Table , whenfoeuer he fljall
finde the places which he entreateth the fJjall fee howeandto what ende the
fame is to be applied,whether to the confirmation of true doSfrinet or to the con-
futing of the aduerfaries^or to the reconciling of fuch places as feeme to be re~
pugnant.And this fh alb e very commodious and profitablcynot onely for the am-
plify ing of any aygument^but alfo to fatisfie themt which arc dcjirous to be con-^
firmed in the principaUpuintes of Chnfiian Religion. For it is manifefi howe
fimple Olid fender is their oration and fpeech , which bring and allege nothing
e Is ybut as they re ad in the Commcntaries:where the authors themfelues (being
mofiii-cnhy and well learned^ do cheefiy defire breuitie , becaufc the readers
fijQuld vfe aridfiudy the commonplaces themfelues jo the ende they fhould the
more largely be applied to thofe things which in the Comentaries are butMrcefiy
expounded. ^gaine,forafmuch aswehaue not alwaycs in readmeffe,what good
authors haue written vpon the fcripturcs : andvery fewe commentaries vpon
fame bookcs , and namely vpon this Inftitution , are to befounde or had. This
Table expoundinge the obfcure and harde ojithorities ^fh all greatly further
and hclpe the readers : For they fhall either finde fame ready interpretationyOr
fome entrance whereby tofearche and finde out the trewefentence. ^And as
touching the tranflationy I trufi it fhall not feeme firaunge to the reader ^in that
1 haue rather followed the felfefame wordcs , a^ they be in the Bible , then ai
they be all edged by Caluin in this his infiitution : For he beingaman moji ex-
cellently w ell learned^ and of great reading (^as by his worlds it doth appeareyhovf
ready and familier the Scriptures were to htm ) had not alwayes the booh^s in
readinesy or lying open before himywhem he wrote.ncithcr was it necejfary that
Vfhatfoeuer he did auouche out of the olde or newT e fame t, he fhould cxpreffe or
write it in thefelfe fame words.for it isfujficietythat thefcnfe be faithfully re-
tainedyi;^ the trew propriety of the words obferuedyi;^ fo to efchew the cauilings
of all men,fauing fuch as will finde fault in thatywhich in the leaftparte cannot
be followed nor obferued.Beingtherforc pcrfvaded that neither he himfelfwiU
be offended t nor the reader mifli/^e , ifthefentetices in the Bible be tranflated
The Prciacc.
according to the Hebrcwe , as concerning the olde Teflament tand according to
the Greece, as tottching the nerve Tefiament : I hane aducntured to aduouche
the authorities of the Serif tures in an other order ( as concerning the tvordes)
then they are al/edged in thu bool^e of Inflitutions. ^nd therefore fometimes
that which is recited in the thirde perfon , this Table doth exfrejfe it in thefe-
conde , and fo contrariwife : butyetfo , that thcfenfe and meaning is ahayes
refcrued,which thing euery manfhaU eajtlypcrceaue^ if diligently and without
hajiy iudgement ,he do conferre euery thing together :for e/fe curiofe heades
do Lofe thatfruiEiyWhich by adui fed reading they might haue and receiue.^nd
its concerning the names and nombers of the bookies , and of the Chapters of the
olde Tefiament, we haue not followed the common tranflationy but that which is
moftagreable to the Hebrew, j^nd therefore we do aduertife the readers ^ that
they do not tai\c thcfr^ booke of the Kinges ^forthefirftof Samuell: nor the
feconde of Kinges yfcr the feconde of the fame Trophcte : which is fo done by
them, who heretofore haue coted the Chapters in this imprinted Boo^ , bycaufe
they followed the Concordances of the BibkyCalled the great Cocordances,which
is colleSfed according to the common tranflation : and by that meanes^as it may
euidently appear e to all men,fome booJ^Cs cf the olde Teflament tOre not rightly
intituled : and the Tfalmcs otherwife and in an other order deuided, then did
the Hcbrewes.^ndforafmuch as all the principallpointes ofreligion^are in this
book^ copioufly and faithfully expounded, we may caflly refute thefalfe opinios
of the aduerfaries. Vyhofoeuer (hall come to the reading thereof either with a
minde to learncjor a dcftre to profit : there is no doubt e, but hefhall very much
frojft himfelfe^ and hclpe others iwhofe confiences hemay fo flrengthen
andaffurey as they neede not to quaile in anypointe , bycaufe they be affured^
that their faith is grounded vpon the firme foundation of the Vrophets and
^pofllesywho wrate and j^ak^ybeinginfpiredby the holy Ghoft, who hath willed
and commaunded his moflpretiofe and deere word , to be redde , htarde , and
handledy in all fear e and reuerencCyWithout adding thereunto , or takinge f-om
the fame deafl we be worthily reproued of our folly. Let vs therforeyin allfimpU-
city and fear c ofGod^ readefo wholfome and necejfary thinges , and daily pro*
ceede therein,in thc^ace and knowledge ofGod,who onely is the fauior^hedde
and Dodior of the Church : To whom tiowc and for euer be dl glory,
Cdmd.Mm» i<6i,
THE
THE TABLE OF ALL THE
things contained in this bookc or volume.
The firji number Jtgnifieth the Bool^e^tJjefccond the Chapter,
the third the SeBion.
A.
^Braham the father of the
faitnfuU- i.iO II.
Abraha iuftificd by Faith
oncly. 3»*'«'}
Abraham liued amifcra-
blclifc. 2.IO.I1
Abra'iarnsborome. 3'*5-^
Accafuiv bishop of Amyda. 4.4-8
Accepcio ot man before God is double.
3-I7-4
Achab and his repentance. J.J.J5.& j
J0.15
Accholytes and chcir office. 4 4.5>.& 4
Accurfinges vvhatitfignificth- 4.11
10
Adam how he fell. 2,1.4
Adam fell by Godsprouidencc. j.a j.8
Aciam rhc latCel-: Lookc Chrill.
Adniiniftration of Sacramentcs is
' parte of the dcclefialticall miniftery.
4 15.30
Admonitions priuate > are neceHary in
the Church. 412.2
Adoration is due to God alone. 2.8.16
Adultery foi bidden a. 8. 41
Aegyptians pratiing is foolish. 1.8.4
Afflidions arc fcnt from God. 1.17.8
AffliSions necCiTarieto the faythfuil.
J. 8.1
AFflidionsprofitablcmany vvayes. j.4
32>??>J4& J'8-2,3
Alfli^ions , the ende to be confidered.
Affliftions of the faithful! do differ fro
the afriidiions of the wicked. 34.
3:.&j.8.i
Affliftions of the wicked , are cur-
fed. J.4-?2,J3
Allegories vnprofitabIe,to be left. 3. 4
4-& 3.5-19
Ambrofc his ilout minde> 4. 1 2.7
Anab^ptifles errors. s. 8. i6.Sc s.iO.r,
7.ac 3.}. 2, 14. &4.I.I J. & 4.1 2.1 a j
14, i5,i6^&4.i6.i.&4.ao.»
Angels created of God. 1.14.3,4
Angels created to the likenes of GocK
1.15.5
Angels arefpirits of anaturccfTcntial.
1.14.9
Angels why fo called. i.«4S
Angels why called Gods.- >I4' J
Angels why called armies. i.i4«J
Angels why called powers. 1.14.5
Angels arcnot to^be worshipped. 1. 14
II
Angels appointed for the fafety of the
faithful. ' 1.14.7
Angels haueChrill to their head.2»».t
& J.22.I
Angels wicked, and their fall. 1.14.1(5
Angclsofhcc. 1.14.6, 12.& 3.20. 2j
Angels haue diuerfc names. 1.14.8
AngerofGodagainllthe wicked. 3.1 J
IS
Anfclmus. 2.2.4
Antichrilts place in the Chiirch.4. 2 • 1 »
Anthropomorphitcs. 4.17.23,25
Appetite to reuenge forbidden. 2.8.57
5r4.20.20
Appetite to reuenge in Sampfon, j . ao
15
Apollinarius an o die hcretike. 2.16, i %
Apoftles whobeproptrJy. 4.3.4,5
Apofllcs wrote and fpakc being infpi-
redby the holy GholK 48.^
ApofHcs hovve to be preferred before
lohnEaptilt. a.jJ.J
Apofllcsfcope in writing. 4.30.12
Apoflles do much differ from thofc
which name themfclues their fuc-
cefTors. 48. 9
Apoflles baptifme was the fame as
was lohns. 2.j> J
ApoRles Crccde or Symbole. s.i tf.i^
The Tabic.
Archfleiaconsand their firft beginninge
' in the church. 4.4 5
Archbishops firH; inftituccd in the
church; 4«4<4
Ariflocratia or the gouernment of ma
nyappqyntedby God. 4.20.8
Ariitotlc. 1.5.5.& I.I J.7
Arrius theheretike confuted. 1.13.4,
16
Afce nHon of Chrift into heauen. 2, 1 6
14
Aftrology the vfe of it. 1 . 5. 5
Authority of Couucels. 4.8.io,ii.& 4
Authority of the Romlshe Church. 4. 6
16
B.
BAckbiting is forbidden, 2«8.47
Baptifmc,andhisfignificatton.4.i5.i
Baptifme inftituted by Chrilt, 4,16.17,
i7
Baptifme the Sacrament of repentance.
415.4
Baptifme and his ceremonies. 4,1 $.1^
Baptifme vvherinit dJffcrethfrom cir-
cumcifion. 4.14. 21. & 4.16. j
Baptifme taken for circumcifion. 4.14
24.& 4.16.6
Baptifme hovvcneceffarie it is. 4.16
a^
Baptifme not to be eftcemed by the di-
gnity of the minilter. 4.15.16
Baptifme bringeth three thinges ne-
cefTarie to the Chriflian fay th. 4.1 5
I
Baptifme of lohn and the ApoHles all
one. 2.5>.5
Baptifme of infantes proued and allo-
wed by the Scriptures. 4.16.1
Baptifme is not to berenued in them
which are baptifed in thepopishc
church. 4,1 J. 1 6
Bjptifme of Cornelius Centurio. 4. 1 5
15
Bafilius. 1. 14.10.5:. 1. 1 6.8
Battels how theybelavvfuU 4.20.1 1
Beginning of religion, 1.12.1
Beginning of shauing and shearingc of
heades andcrovvnesiathe popishe
church. 4.15.26,27
Beleue the church , but not in the
church, 4.f.»
Benefices how they be giue in the po-
pish church. 4«5.^
Btrengarius. 4»7. » »
Bishops, prieftes, paitors & ministers,
dofometimes iignifieone thinge.4.3(
8
Bishops who ougnt to be chofen. 4 j
i»
Bishops vicars what manerof cxami-
nations they do vfe. 4«5.5
BlellingofGod hath great power. 3.7
Body isconfecratedto God. 525.7
Body of Chrift is limited and in a ccr«
taine place. 4 i7.2(S
BodyofChnftjhoyyeit is eaten m the
fupper. 4«»7- J
Body of Chrift is called aTepIe.2 » 4.4
Bread is taken for all thinges neceffary
for the body. j, 20.44
Bread taketb the name of the body of
Chrift. 4.17.20
Breadof lifeis Chviftt 4'i7-5
Buriall of Chrift, andtheHgnificacioa
of It, ^1^.7
CAligula an impudent contemner of
Chrift. \^ I.J »
Calling of the Gcntile^y' 2.11.11,1a
Calling, two kindes. 3 24-8
Callingofeuery man is to be conflde-
red. 3.io.tf
Callinge of paftors confiftcth in fourc
things. 4«3'*'
Canons, what they be in the popishe
church. 4 5.10
Cardinals, hovvc they crept into the
church. 4»7«jo
Care of the poore in the church. 4. ?.8
Catechiftng in the church. 4 ip.n
Cachariens. 4'''iJ
Catholike orvniuerfall church. 4 i.»
Cato. « 3.10.4
Caufesofotir faluatiofoure, 3.14.17.21
Ceremonies taken a way by Chrift. 4
14.2$
Ceremonies without Chrift vnprofi-
tablc. 4>M 2$
Celeftine (he hcretike confuted. 2. 1 .5
Ch:U>leine$
The Table.
Chaplcinesvvhattheybeinthc popish
church. 4.S.10
Chaunting or finging brought into the
church. 3.20.31
Charitviscngendredoffaith. 5 2.41
Chrift is God ecernalJ.i 1 jy.fic 2,T4.i
Chrilt God andman. 2.1 ji'
Chriilhath two natures. 2.41
Chnft why called Icfus. ' 2.16.1
Chrift ail other Adam, i.i 5.4.& 2.12.7
Ghrifti? the only Mediator. 3.20.17
Chnft named an Angell. i j .1 o.& i • < 4
Chrift the true and onel y author ofmi •
trades. J.I 3.1 J
Chrill the author of life. 3,171
Chrift the head of the church. 4.6.^
Chrifthcadof men and Angels. 2.1 2.1
■>■ >' & 3.22.1
Chrift the onely nourishment & foodc
of our (bules. 4.1 7.1
Chrift the one! ymaifter *nd teacher of
-'rhe church. 4.?.3.&4.*.7,8'
Chrift the (onne ofDauid. i-i J«3
Chrilt properly the fonne of God. 2 14
5
Chrift the end of the law. i.tf 2.& iS-
4'&a.7 I
Chrift brother of all faithfull. 2.J2.X"
Chnft the only fuadation of the church
Chrift to become a Mediator mult
• nedcs become a man. 2.12.1,4'
Chrift the mcft perfcdi image of God.
1.15.4
Chriftiudgeof the whole vvorlJe. i
16.17
Chrift the fiibftauncc of all thefacra-
menccs. I 14.16.& 4 17.11
Chrift the oncIy Mediator bctvvcne
God&man. 1. 14.12 & 2.6.2, j.8c»
12.I.& 2.16.16 & 3.171, 4& 3.10
I7,&4I2.J5
Chrift the very obieft of Bdptifmc4.i 5
6
Chriftes bodyhowe it is eaten in the
Tupper, 4«'7'5
Chrift the bread of life. 4-i7-5
Chrift a Prophet,Iudgc,& Pricft 2.15. 1
Chrift the true glafteoi our eleAion.3
MS
Chnft is a Pricft. i.i 1.4 & i.i j.tf.Sr 4
i8.2.&4.i5).28
Chrift the only kcper of the cle^3.24.tf
Chrift the bright funne of iuftice. 2.10
20 & 3.15.I.&4-8.7
Chrift the foule & lifeofthelavv.2.7.»
Chrift bapti led about thirty yercs of bit
age 41^.39
Chnft fubie^ CO diuerfeaffli^ions. 3.8
z
Chrift is manifefted and difcoueredin
the Gofpcll 2.j>.t
Chrift was without finnc. 2.1 3.4 & S
16.5
Chrift hath purchafed the grace of God
and life euerlafting. 2.17.1-
Chrift is to be fought inheauen. 4.17
Chrift did verily cake the nacure ofmi
vponhim. 2.1 j.i
Chrift fittcth at the right hande of the
father. *'*4«J
Chrift alone is fuffjcientto the faithful,
2.16.19
Chriftes crofTe the chaiioc of criumphe
■'.., ' -:-:p.- , V j : .n. - . 2 l6.tf
Chrift the heade of Angels. 2.12. i.& j
•-. - 2 2.1
Chrift shal come to iudgemenr.i. 16.17
Chrift is endued vvitli a flesh bringing
life. i 4-»7.9
Chrift by his dea th brought to vs life,
2.16.5
Chrift defcended intohell. 2.16.8^9
chrift afccnded irttobeauen. 2.16 14
Chrift fafted forty dayes,and for what
caufe. 4.12.20
Chrift tf)oke vppon him all ounnfirmi-
tiesc.Kcept finne. 3.16.1%
Chrift endued with perfeft iuftice. j
14.1a
Chriftes miracles. i.i 3.1 j
Chriftes merite. 117.1
Chrift by his obedience tooke away
ourfinne. 1.16.5
Chriftes office. 2.6.1. & i.S«2.& 2.1 luf
& 3.12.7
Chrift endued with all power, i.i 5 5
& 2.16.1^
chrifteskingdomceucrlaftinge.2.15 i
The
Bcclefiafticall difciplin?. 4. 1 2.1
Bcdeiiaflicall dilcipline ssicigaced. 4
12.9
Eating of Chriftes flesh. 4'J7'5
EfFedes of repentance. J»3*5>i<^
Pgvpci.ms vainepracling. 1.8.4
"BlsGk , are onely partaKers of Gods
grace. 2.Z.6
Ele(aonIy,dobcleuctrucly. 1.7. s.& J
2.11. & 5.24.2
Elcft onIy,feareGod. 2-?'4
Eleft only, can not perish. 3.246,7
EJeftjdifFerfrom the reprobate. J. 2.27
& 3.4.3 2.& 3.8 6.& 3.5>.6.& 5.1 J 3
& 3.20.1<J,2p
Eleftionof Godeternall. 3.21.1
Ele<£lion is free. 3.22,1
Election the tundatio of Gods church.
4.1.2
Eleftion confirmed by calhng. 3.241
Eleftt'ons conitancy* 3 24-4
Elcaio,theend ofuisholincs. 3^2 3.1 2
Ehasfafting. 4.1220
End of the commaundementes.2.8.8,5>
Bnde of mans regeneration, i.i 5.4.8: 3
3.19
Endofaffli(ftio,tobeconfidered. j.p^i
Endofelcdlionisholinefl'e. 3.23.12
End of excommunication. 4'».5
Enemies mull be loucd. 2.8.35.36.
Epicures opinion of the diuinitie. 12.2
Epicures be alvvaycs many. 1.15.4
Epiphanius. 4.9.5>.&4<i 5.21
Eredion ofhandes in prayers. 5 .20.1 6
Errors mingled alvvayes with faith.
3.2.31
Earthly goods hov V to be vfed, j.io.i
Efau and his repentance. ?'?-^5
Ethnikes temples are prophane. 4.1.5
Euangeliltes office. 4- 3-4
Euillangells and their fall. 1.14K5
EnuchusgodhneJle. 3.2.32
Eufebius. i.ii.rt.&4.<J.i4.& 4.7.26.
Eutichcs the heretike. 2.14.4,8. & 4.17
fixaminatios of Bishops & their vicars.
4.5.5
Excommunicatio, wherein it difFereth
fi-om accurfing. 4.1 2.1 0
Bxcommunication hath three endes. 4
11,5
Tabic.
Exhortation neccfTary to thefaithfulf.
2.7.1*
Exhortation to praier 8c fa(ling.4.i 2.14
Exhorcationjthevfeof it. 2.55
Exorciites in thepopishe church. 4,19
:24
Exeuperias Bishop ofTolofa. 4*5-it
F. ---'V .
F All of Adam. 1.1 4
Fallof Angtls. 1. 14.16
Fafeboode of Pope Zacharias. 4.7<i'7
F.iftingofElias. 4.1:. 20
faltjngufGhrift, 4.12.20
F.irting of Mofes. 4.»3.io
Falting of Papiites. 4*2.21
Fa/ling defined. ' 4.1 2. iS
Faltinge true hath three endes. 41 2.15
F.iilingthe vfeofit. 3-?''7
Faftinghovvncceflfaryicis 4.1 2.(4
FaltingofNchemias. 4.12 itf
Fathers vnder the olde Teftat»ent. 2.7
16. & a.<).i,2,4.& 2. 10.5. & 2.14.5
& 4.10.14 (k 4.14.23
Fault and p^iineconioyned. h^'^9
Faithful men, why they be called lufl.
4.15.10
Faithfullmen,are the fonnesofGod. 4
>7.»
Faithful! men, are finners in this life. }
3.ii,i>
FaithfulImen,arenamedPriefts,2 i5.<
Faithfull, are taught of God. 3 a.tf
Faithful arecaricd intofundry thoghts
^.2.lS
Faithfull are partakers of Chriftcs
death and rerurreftion,and by what
reaibn. i»i'9
Faithful do fomtimes vtter their inno-
cency and integrity. 3.i4i8,ip
Faithfull, why called Chrfflians.a.r^.j;
Faithfull alvvaies at warres. 1.14 13,
I 5,j8.& J.3.10.& 3. 20. 46. &4. 1 5
II, la
Faithfull mens conditions. 2.15 i.& j
8.i.&}.5>6
Faithfull fe are not death. ^•9-S
Faithfull mens feare. 3. 2. 21. ax
Faithfull mens defire 4'»? 4
Faithfull mens dignity. 1.14.2.& i.i6
i6.&4.i7.»
Faithfull mes felicity.2.i5.4.& j.as.i^
The Tabic.
FaitTiruIIs vertue. a. 5. 5
Faithfullspcrfedion. 3''7««y
FaithfuUs iacrifice. 4.18.4,1^
F:t)thfulla!vvaie$fafe. J»24'7
Faichfull, conquerers ofSathan. 1.14
iS
Faith hathdiuerfe (igDiHcacions. j 2
Faith taken fometimes for hope. 3. a.
45
Faith taken for furc confidence. 3.2.1.5
Faith hath power to vvorke miracles.
Fafthiscrue. x.7.5 & 3.2.tf>7,4i
Faithes nature. 3-*3-4
Faith IS founded vppon Gods promife.
J. a. 29
Faith is nccefTarytobeencreafcd. 4.14
7
Faith the gift of God. 1.7. $.&».). 8
Faith froceedeth from elc^ion, 3.21
10
Faith foUovrethdodrine. 3.1.5
Fauhis not without vnderllandinge.
Faith is ioyned with hope. 3.*.4a
Faith mud be firme and certaine. 3.2.
3^
Faith hoTve it is called a vvorkc« 3.}
35
Faith the mother of inuocation. 3.20
1
Faith the roote of all good thiags.4. 1 ^
20
Faith bredeth repentance. 3.3.1
Faith onely iultifieth. $.ii>tp.Sc 3. '7
to
Faith regeneratcth man. 3. j.i
Faith ofthereprobatc. |. 2.10,11
Faith of Simon Magus. 3.1.10
Faith of Sophiftes intricate. j.i 1
Faithes obic5. 3.?«i5>
Faith formed and informed deuifed by
theSopSiftcs. 3,2.8
Faith engendreth charity. 3.241
FeareofGod. 3.1. i*
Fearcof God what it is in the repro-
bate. 3.1.17.&4.I0.2 3
Fight ofthef.]ithfull perpetual]. 1.14,
I j, I5,i8.& 3.3.10.& 3.10.46 & 4
15.11,12
Firft begotte, God many times cotei*.
ncth. 3.22.J
Flatterers are daungerous about pna>
ces. 4.20.1,}*
Fortunea tcrmcof thcethnikes. n6
Fortune hath no force 1.1(^.1,4 & 3.7
>o
Friuolus reuelations of nevve giddy
braincs. i ^t
Free will before the fall. i.i 5.S
Ffcevvill of man. i.i$.Z.Sc i,i.t.8c f
Foundation of faith. 3.1.2^
Foundation of the church.i .7. a. & 4. »
I
G.
QAlene. t.$.»
^^Garrifons in cities. 3.20.1s
Glory of the fijithfuU, after this life.|
15.10
Glory of the faithfull in this life. 2.15
4&3t3.t
Cod IS one. 1. 10.3. & 2.8. itf
God is no accepter of perfons. 3. 2 {.10
God is the beginning of al good things
I t.t
God is not the author of finne. i.i 4 i tf
& 118.4.& 2.4.»
God only knovveth the hartes. 2.S.i|
& 5 4-9
God the onely creator of all thinges.i
God the teacher of the faithfull. 3. 2. tf
Godiudgeof the whole vvorlde.i.i^
6
God the fpirituall law maker. i.S.tf
Godis alaw tohimfelfc. 3.23.*
God is omnipotent. 1.16.2, {
God is the Ipoufc of the Church. a.S
li
God of nature is hberall. 3, 20. 1 6
God is king for cuer. 3.20wf»
GodisalwaycsLkehimfelfe. 1.4.1,1
& 3. 1 1. 1]
God, howe he was vifibie in the per-
, fonofChrift. j j>.|
God , why he made the world e in fix
daycs- 1.14.1a
God i-. not to be reprcfenccd in any
vifible forme or shape. a.ii.i
The Tabic.
God how he iVftydtobe inhcauen. 3 Gods prefencemaketh ma afraid, i.i. j
2040 Godsfrcepiomifejisthcfundation.of
God is to be knovvcn tvvo maimer of
vvayes. 1.2.1
Godis afubHiance fimple and infinite i
I J. 2
Godmadeacouenant vvithvs & with
the church. j 2.29
Gads promifcs , are cffeftuall ondy in
the ele^. j.24 16
Gods promifesarcal included in Chrift
• J. 2 51
our forefathers , but yet diuerfely.2 Gods gracCjCaufe ofgood yvorkes.j. 3
10 2 ti
God,vvhy heisnot plcafed with dif Godsprouidencc to all creatures i.\6
fembling repentance. 3 J*25 1.4
Godjhovv hcvvorktthinthehartesrf>f Gods prouidcnc?, how tobc confide-
mcn. 2.41 red, 1.17.1 & I 5.<>,7
God, hovvc hcblindethand hardneth Gods prouidence in diftribution of
the heartes of the reprobate. 2.4.3 kingdomes. 4,10. j6
God vvorkethinhis cle6i tvvomaner Godspovvcr hovve to be confidcred*
ofvvayes 2- 5 5 i.»<J. j.& 1. 14. 2o,ai.& 3.2.31
Godgiuethhisgoodnesonely to thee- Godskingdom. S'3''9
led. 2.2.6.& 2. J.14 Gods will to be obeyed. 3.20.45
Godcnrichethmcn vYithhisblcfTings Gods will, the belt rule of lulticc. j.
Cod povvrcth his mercy vpon alcrca Gods bleffing of great force. 37.8,9
turcs. 1.5 5 Godsnamertueretly tobe vred.2.8 21
God kepeth alvvaycs his church.2 1 5 5 Gods name to be ranftificd. 2.8.22.& }
God rulcth ail thinges by his proui-
dence. 1.16.1
God wirnedeth his anger againftthe
reprobate. 3,25 12
God of his freegoodnelTc preuenteth
men, 3'»-4i & 3 14 5
Cod Confidcreth r.ithcr the hart than
20 41
Good,caned/«w7»«wJbo»«»»,hovvcit i*
in man. ' 3.2?.!
Good,calledj«w7»«»7t9M«w,whatiti$
after Platos opinion. 1.2}
Goods of the church,hovv they ought
tobediftributed. 4*4^
the vvorkes of ma. 3.1 4.8.& 3.20.31 Good vvorkcs come of Gods grace. >
Godhowche vieth the vvicked.i.18.1 7-i:T.3.ij
Cod many vvayes re wardeth his. 3.1 <; Goodworkesproceedcof &yth. 413
4.& 3.20.i2,i5>.& 4 17.14 20
God will lia je his worde to beprca- Goods earthly, how to be vfed. 5.1 o.i
chedfomttimeto the wicked. 3.14 Goodamongthereprobate.3.2i.7.& 4
i.7,8,*i?
Goodncsof God obie^offaith.3.3'i9
Godlines of Rnuchus. 3.2. 3 %
GodlinesofNaaman Syrus. 3'i-3*
Gouernours of the church. 4•^8
Gofpcl is taken for the manifeft decla*
ration of Gods will. 2.9%
Gofpell preached fometimes to the re-
probate .ind vvicked. 3.»'4«
Oofpel differcrhfro the Law. 2.9. 2, 34
Gofpell the effcft of it. 3*3>'>i.9
Gofpcl refpefte^ih faith. 2ii.»7
Grace ofGod is free. ^.ii.S.Sc 3.2 2.J
Gregory the vi j. his fubtilty. 4.1 1 . 1 j
Gregorics
Cods image in man. 1,1 5. 3. & 2.1 2. <J
Gods anger ag.iinll the wicked. 3.25
12
Gods diuinity graue in mans hart 1.23
Gods cleftion eternall. 3.21.1
Gods promife the foundation of fas th.
3.2.29
Cods commaundemenes can not be ex-
adlykept. a'5-4»tf
Cods commaundementcs are not to be
efteemcd by the power of man. 2 5
4,<f
CodsprefenceyYvhat icis. 3*2i<5
The
CregOrieJ opinion of images. 1.11.5.
Gr€gorieNazianzcne.i.i3.»7.& 4 .^.u.
H.
TJArtcsof men arcin Gods povver.
■*-^ 1.181,1.
Hcrttikcs differ fro fchifraatikes 4. a. 5.
Hierarchic of chcPope. 4'5''3-
Higi^ Priclt in the olde lavvca figure of
Chrift. 4.<S.2.&4.i2.a5.& 4.X4.21.
Hieromeis rcproucd. »M'5'
Hildtbrand named Gregory the vij. 4,
11.13.
HipocrifjeinucRcd inman. i.i.a.
Hipocrites naciirc. i.4-4.
Hipocntcs prayers deteftable befoic
God. 3.20. ?5>,
Hiporafticall vnion of two natures in
Chrift. a. I 4.5.
Holy Gboflis Godcternall- 1.1 j 14.
HoiyGholi-is an inward ceachtr. j 1.4.
Holy Ghoft dvvclliih not among the
wicked. 3.2.16.
Holy Ghoffs office. 3.2 jtf.
Holy Ghofts vvorkc. 4.1 4.8, >
H(Jy Ghoftstitlts. J'-'J*
HolineiTc of life the endc of election,
3.23 !2.
Homerus. 1 17 3 & ».3.i7.& 4.<?.8.
Homicide forbidden. 2.8.3^.
Honcftie to be obfcrued in the Cliurch.
4.5 0.2p.
Honor due to the ciders. 2 S 15*
Honor hath diucrfc (ignifications, 2.
8.25.
Honor is ofthree fortes. 5836.
Hope taken for faith. 3.*-43
Hope ioined with faith. 3.1.42.
Hops reachcth Utyond death 3 14.7.
Hope the nature thereof. 3'»5-'.
Hope is accepted before handc of God
for many refpe^J. 3* *• 3 * •
Horace. 1.11.14.
I.
T A cob an example of an outward mi -
•*• ferablelife. 2.!0.i».
lacobs Ladder. 1.14 12.
Idolatry is condemned. i.if.i.& 2.8.
16,17.
Idolatry the beginning of it. 1 . 5. 1 1 .&
I. 11.^.
lephthes vo we* 4 * J • * 5
1 able.
lefuites. j. j.s
lewes the firft begotten in Gods fa-
mily. 4.16.14
Ignatius. i.i3.2j>
Ignoraunce is-nota finne alone. 2.1.22
Image ofGod in man. 1.1 5. 3.& 212. 6
Images lavvfulland vnlavvfull. i.ii.i »
Immunitie claimed by the clcrgie. 4.
515
Impofitio of handes licth in the difpo-
(ition ofthe paftors. 4«$-*tf
Im.pofition of handes vvhctheritbea
fdcramcnt. 4.14.20
Indulgences added to fatisfudion. 3.
/ndulgences their beginning. J 5.5
Infantes bring their damnation out of
their mothers bellies. 41 5.10
InfartesnevYC borne of God. 4 i5.i7
Infantes are to be b.iptized. 4.16 i
Infidelitic thcrootc of all cuill. 2.1.4
Inobediecc the firft decay of man 2.1.4
Intentions good. 2.2,25
IntercclTionof faintcSjfrom whence it
fproiig. 3.20.21
Inuocarioncommcthof faith. 3. 20. 21
Inuoc2tion due to God onely 2S.16
lohnsbaptifme and the Apoflles one.
lohnBaptifles minjUery. 415.17
John Bjptiftes office. ^9S
IJihnBaptilt the middle betvvene the
Iuv\ eand Gofpell. 2^.5
lohn BaptiA mcffengcr of the Gofpell.
2 9 J
John Baptiftjhovv he was called Elias,
2.5>.J
lofephus. i.8,4.&'i8i»
Ifaakes condition touching the vvorld.
2 10 12
I faakes (inne or offence. J-^'j'
ludasjhovvc he vvas elefied. 3.24.5^
ludas, how he did communicate with
Chrift in the Supper. 4- '7- 34
ludgemenics of God are oftwo fortei.
J 43«
ludgemcntcs hovve they be lavvfull,
4 20,1 1
lurifdidion in man is double. 4.15). i %
lurifdi^^ion of the Church, in whom
icif. 4 7 5.3C4.1I.K
RrRR
The Table.
K'
lurifdii^ion in the Church. 4.11.1
luiliceof Chrrftisperfed. 3.14.12
luftice is not to be had by workes.
3.1 S.I
luftice of workes. j.18.1
lullificatio before God,3.ii.2.& 3.17.1a
luftinethc Maicir, i 10.3
luucnali. I. II. 2
K.
Sycs ofthckingdome ofGod.4«<!».4.
&4,a>io.&4.ii.x
Kingdome of Chrift is euerlaJting. ». r 5
3.& 3.12.7
King.iomc of God. 3«J''P
Kingdomcs are diftributcd by the pro-
uidence of God^ 4.20.26
Kings are tobeobcied.4.20 8,22,23,32
Kinges & M^giftratcs are named Gods.
4.16.31
Kinges not to be attended with fiat
tercrs. 4.20.32
Knowledge of God grafted in mans
hart. 1. 3. 1
Knowledge of Clirift. 3.2'6
KnowJedge ofman isnccelTary. i.i.i
Knowledge ofman is double. 1.15,1
Knowledge of euerlafting life,is graf-
ted in manncs hart, 1.15.(5
L.
T Acedemoniansdifcipline. 4.i}.5>
Lactantius. 1.4.3. & i-«».6
ladder of facob, 1.14.1 2
Lacriaand Dulia. i.4.3,& i.i 2.2
La%'v,thc fummeof it. 2,8. i 1
LaWjChcoffice.ofit. z.j,6.8c 3.1 «? 2,&
415.1*
Lavvjths vfe ofit. i.i2.i.5: 2.7.1
Lavves ciuile ,tobcmadc by men. 4.
20.15
Lavves poiitike are the finevves of the
ro.nimon wealch. 4.20.14
lawe of God, by Mofes is dcuidcd into
three partes. 4.20.14
Lawe Morall confilleth of two partes.
4.20.1 J
Law of Mofi^s^Conferued by miracles.
J^ 1.8.5
La WjWh^t was publifhed. 1.6.1
Lavv,l-^ovv it was abrogated. 2.7. 14
Lawrp'rituall. 2.8.6
Larve can not be kept by meanes of
mans weaknefTe. t.5,<f,7.& 1.7 4, 5f
Law isfowcin cucry mans hart. 2. 2.1 j
Laying oil of handes reftcth in thcdi-
fcretion ofthepaftors. 4.316
Laying on of handes , whether it be a
facrament. 4.14,20
Laymenmay notbaptife. 415.10
Lying forbidden. 2.8.47
Lcncluperftiriotifly kept. 4.1 2.2O
Libertic Chriitiaii, is fpirituall. 3.15?. j
Libcrtie Chrittian, confifteth in three
pointes. 3 19.*
LibertJe of people in choofrng Bifhops-
4.4.11
Lifting vp ofh.mdesin prayer. 3.20 16
Luft or defirc to reucngc, forbidden.
4 20 20
Lordes prayer. 3.20.35
M.
\/f Accdonian the hcrctike confuted
3.13 6
Magiltrate,ihedignitieof it. 4.20. 14.
Magitlrate , the office of it .3.8.46.5c
4,20.9
Magiftrate is to be obeyed. 4.20. 8,
Magiftrate fubieoro God. a. 8. 5 8. &
420.31
Magiftrace may kill wichoue offenfc.
4.20.10
Magiftrates ordeincd tofenie Sc plcafe
God. 4-»o,4
MagiHrates called fomecimes Gods. 4
16. ji
Magiftrates beGods Vicars. 4.20.6
Manncs creation, i.i 5.1. & s.t. 10. &:
2.3.11. & 2. 5.18
Mannes cxccllcncie. j.15.3,4
Man is like to a litle world. I-S.J
Manfubie^ to infinit perils, 1.17.10
Mannes hart in Gods power. 1.18.1,1
Manichees the hcretiqi(€ confnted. t
I5.1.& i.i4.3.&i.i5,5. & 2.1. n. &
a.ii.3.& 2.13.1,2 & 2.14.8. & 3.11.5
& 3 a3.5.& 3.2S.7.& 4.12.1J
Marcionites. i.i 3.1,2 & 4. 17.17
Marie the mother of Chrilt co/in to
lofeph. 1.1 3. 3
Mariageordeinedof God. 2.8.41
Mariage is not robe forbidden to the
Miaiiters of the Church. 4 1 2.13
Mar i age
The Table.
Manage isnocaSacramenr« 4 i <>. 34
MatTcSjCFie beginning of them. 4.1 s.8
MaflcSjthe vtrtucot chcm. 2.15 6.S;4.
2.*^ ii 4. 3,1
MalTcs plecifull in the popifhc Church.
459
Meritc contrary to faith. ?'i)-i
Mcrite of Chiid. 2.Z7.1
h/iCTcy and truth are crtnioyneJ. J J J .4
Mercy of God poured vpon ail crea
turcs. *S'5
Michael Seruetus an Anabapt^/h^.i^. jj
Michael Seruetus confuted i J 3. ; 0,22
& ■.'5.5.& 2.9.3& 2 :0 I. Si 2.!4.$,
<^,7,&4.i6.25),5i.&.4.i7 25,30
Mil'.-fius piroiitrbe. 4.1 j 1$
Miniltcric of the word moft ncctflary
in the Church. 4.1. 5, & 4.5.2_3.&4
'.4,11
Miniftcry of lohn Baptiftc and rhe A-
poftlesone. 4'M'7
M'lacles ofChrift. 1.1 j, 5
Moderatorj of the Church. 4.?. 8
MouefticnccefTary to tliefaiihfuli, i.z
1,11
Menkes not knovve^n the prim it ue
Church. '^ 4.5.8
Monkes full of corrupted mancri. 4
M >5
Monkes make rafhcvoYves, 4 I J j,»7
Monkery a perilofe fedle. 4.1;. 14
Monica S Augultines mot'.er. ?.>.iO
Monitions priuac , necellaric in the
Church. 4.' i.i
Monethelits confuted, 2.16.12
Mortification of thcflerhe. 2.' 6-7
'Mor^ll conic£lures contrary to faith.
3.2^8
Mofcschiefe of the Prophets. 4.8.2
Mofes wrote familiarly. i.i4-?
Mofes dodrinc. i.Jii?
Mofcsfafted XL.d.iyes &vvhy.4 M.20
Murthcr forbidden. i-8 3i>
N.
Y^Aaman the Syrians pietie. 32.31
Name of God to be taken in all re
uerencc 2.8.21
Name of God hovve to be fandiified.
2.8.22 & ;. 20.41
Name of Chrifl attributed lometimes
CO the Church. 4.17. as
Natures corruption, l.J.i
Nature in the perfon of Chrift,doublc,
a.i4.c
Nature of faith. 3«»J.4
Ncccllitic IS double. 1.1 6.^
NeccHiiie diftcrcth fr5 copulfion. 2.3.5
NeceiTitic fatall < f the lioikes. 1,1 6.8
Neighbour, vvhat it ligniheth. 2.8. 5 5
Nehen)iasfaft. 4.12.16
Ne/torJus thcherctike. 214.4,5
Nouatianus theherctike confuted, j.j
21. ik 4.1. i|
Ncnnes not knowcnin the primatiuc
Church. 413.1^
O.
A\Bedien'-e idoII acceptable to God.
^ 2.85
Obedience of Chriit takcth away our
finnes. 2. 6 5
Obedience devve to parents. 1.8,38
Obediece due to kings and magiitiats.
4.20.8, a:, 23,3*
Obic6l of faith. 3i*^9
Obietnacions of dayes fuperiljciofiy
v(ed,ii tondtniiud. . a. 8. 31
ObferuacJon of Lent , is fuptrfticious,
4.11. 30
Obferuacion of the S^baoth which i$
tlie trtie. 2.8.28
Office ofa Paftor. 2 8.46 & 3.3 17. &4
1.1,5, ^^'S< 4 3.tf.& 4.8.1. & 4.12.1
11,14,17
Office of Chrift. 2.6.1.& 2,5 .!,& a.ii
4& 5-'* 7
Office of in Euangehft. 4.3.4
Office of the lawe. a.7.6.& 5. '5.2- Sc
4.15.11
Office of .^M^niftrate. 2.8.46.^^ 4.20.9
Office of a Priefl. 4.12.1
Office of tile holy Ghoft. J^jfi
Office of lohn Baptilt. 2.5.5
Office of Angels. 1. 14.5,11. & 3.20.21
Office ofa Pjrtor, ditttrw th frow the of-
fice of a prince 4.1 1. 8
Officials, why they were ordrcd.4,11.7
Otienccsareoftvvo fortt^ 3.1^.14
Offences are CO be JU«'ide8fe_ 3'^j>.'i
0|de Teltament confirmed u!^ Chrift.
1.10.4
Olde Yvidovves and their fingle life,
4.i}.il
RRKR ij
The Tabic.
One vvorke appointed many times to
mnny contrariC"). i.iJ$.4,& 2.4.»
Orders, a Sacrament of the fcholtmcns
inuentioii, j^i^.ii
Or;£cnts. 2.2.4,»7.& 2. 5.17.&.2.*
I2.&3.22.*
OJiandcr confuted. xij.jjy &2.ji
5,6,7.& 3.11 5
Ouidc. I-I5.J,22,2J
Outward fignes of repentance. ^.12
theeleft. I- J'*
Pcrfuns worshipped tlic5unne. i n.i
Perfons what thty are in fcripture J
2^.10
Perfons three in one diuine fubftancc.
l.X j.l
Peter had no authoritieoucr other A-
poftles. 4.6.5
Peter was not at Rome. 4-<^.(4
Philofophcrs opmionoffree will. 2. 2. j
Phocas the patrone of the Romish fca
or primacie.
P.
pAciencenece/Tafytothefaithfull. }. Pyghfus the here tike.
8.1.&: J 20 5>.& j,:^.! Plato the Philofopher,
Pacicnce of Chriltians diifcreth from Plautus.
the pjcicnccof Phjlofophers. j.S.ii Plutarchc.
Papiftes Lke apes do coutcrfait Chrift, Pollicie among C hriftians.
4.17.7
3 a.jo
1.5.10
1.17 }
1.3.3
4.20.3
4.1^ 2^
1 11.5
2.15.1
4 12.21
4.5 »3
4. 2.2
Papiftes do defend Images.
P.tpi'des knovve not Cbrift.
P^;>iftcsfaft.
Papiltes Hierarchic,
Papilte-; Church.
Paphnutius opinion offinglelifc 4.
12.2({
Pardons added to facisfaftion. $'$'i.
Pardons when thcybcg in. 3.5.$
Paflnr .-)iui Bishop.' 4 3.8
Patters in the Church.
4.345
Paftors and do£lors neceffary in the Popishechurcii.
Church. 4«?4 Popishe hierarchic.
PoIIicies EcclfcflaihcalJ not to be con-
temned. 4.10.27.
Poorc to be prouidcd for in the church
4.3.5
Pope is Antichrifh 4.7.21,2 $.& 4 ^.4
Pope nameth himfelfe Chrifles Vicar.
4 6. 2
Pope hath fubicfted to bimfelf the Em-
pire of the weft. 4.1 1. 1 j
Pope howe and by what meancs he if
growenvp. 4.7.1
Popishe fading. 4.1 2.21
4 2. »
4.5 n
payors office. ».8.4tf.Sc 3.3.17, &4.f. Power of Prophets^
i,S,»2.& 4,3.6. & 4.JJ.I.& 4.12.2,
««,i4,«7
Paftors power and authoritie. 3.4. « 4
P.".llors calling. 4-J«»>
Patriarches in the Church. 4'4«4
Peace pi ocecdcth from the remilSon
of fume. 3.' 3 4
Pclagiusand hisherefies cofutcJ, 2.1.
5.3c a i.at & 2 3.7. & 2.7.5 & J »2 8
Penance is no Sacrament. 4,1 j> 14. » 5.
Perfcdionm tHe Church, 4.8.12
l*crfjdion of thefaithful. 3 17.1S
Perfeftion of faith. i-^7^S
Pcnurie is execrable. i.S.24
Ptrpetuitie of the Church, 2.1 5.3
Perfecucionforiultice. 3«8 7
Perfcucraunce the gifteofGod. 2. 3.
11.& 2. 5. J
48.5
PowcrofGod^howcobcconfidered.
X. 14.20,21. & 1.16.1.& 3.2.41
Power of the church conliftethin liij.
point;. 4.7.tf
Power of the church fubiefttoGods
word. 4.8.4
Power to bindeandloofc. 3.4.14,1 J
Prayers muft be continual!. 3.20.7
Prayers of hypocrites beabhominable.
3.10. ip
Prayers of dead S^iinftes. 3.20 ai
Praycr,vvhatitfignifieth. 3.20.2
Praver necclTaiv to the faithfull. 3. 20. 2
Prayer. profitable many waycs. 3.20.2
Prayers howe to be made. 3.20 4,7,8,
9,n
Prayers publike acceptable to God.
3.20,20,29
Perfeucraunce properly perteincth to Prayer ofthe Lord expounded. ^.10.^6
Preccpic
The Tabic.
Pr«ccptc$of Goddepcnde not vppon
mans power. 1.5.4,5
Precepts of the law how they are to
be confidcrei^. a.ii.8
Preceptsof God can not be firmely ob-
lerued. 2>5.4,.<$
Precepts be of three fortes. 2.5.6,8
Preachingcof theGofpell is common
with the reprobate. 3 »4««
Predeftina;io,vvhacitngnificth.5.2». 5
PredeAination is harde to be knowen.
Prieiles fecular in the Popishe church.
Prieftes office. 4.1 :.s
PricfthodcofChrift. 4.6.1
Pricftes in the old La we Were figures
oFChriih4.6,2.&4.i2.a5.& 4.14.21
Preparation of the Papiftcs. 2.127
Prelence of God maketh man to feare
and tremble. 1.1 3
Prefetice,vvhat itfignificth J.ii.J
Primacy of the church of Rome 4. 6.1
Princes are to be ubeied.4.20. {,22,2}
Princes not to be flattered. 4 20.1
Promifcs of God, the fundation of faith
3 2 15
Promifcs of God eficduall oncly to the
eled. 2.24.16
Promifcs of God included in Chrilt. j
2.J2
Promifesofthegofpcland of the law,
how they agree. 3-'7-»
Prophcrs,vvho be properly 4»J.4
Prophets interpreters of the Lawc.f.tf
2.& 4 i.6
Prophets shadovvGods goodnes vndcr
earthly benefits. 1.10.20
Prophets and their povyer. 48 j
\ Proucib ofMilefius. 4.1 j. 15
ProuidenccofGudto alcreatures.i.itf
Prouidcncc of God , hovre to be confi-
dered. 1.5.6,7 & 1. 17. i
Prouidenceof God in dillributinge of
kingdoms. 4.20.16
Pride ingraffed in man. i.i.i
Pride the beginning of all euill. 1.14
Priuate admooicios acccilarym Gods
church* 4U>9
Purgatory hovvfirft inuented. 3.5.^,7
CL
QVeftions vnprofuablc , to be rcic*
.^<Qttd. i.i4.i,4.& 2.12. 5
R.
T>Ebecca,herfinne. ;.2. ;{i
•^Rcaon ofmanisbh'nde in fpirituall
things. 2.2.i5>
Reafon his force and nature. 1.2.2
Redemption is o.ily in Chrift. 2.6.1
Regeneration through f<*ith. j.j.i
RcgcneratioOjthe end of it. 1.15.4^ i
3-^9
Regeneration after the opinion of the
Anabaptiflcs. J}*' 4
Regiment in manne is double. } • 1 <;.i s
&4.2':>.i
ReIigion,the beginning of it. 1.12 i
Religion the true. 1.2. 2.& 1.4.J
Reminionoffmnesisonlyin Chrilt. 4.1
20
Remiflion of finncj the cntrie into the
church and kingdom of God. 4.1.20
Renounce himfelf,vvhat it is. j. 5 8.&j
Repetitions familiar with the lewes.
I 15.I
Repentance true. ?-3?
Repentance true proceedeth of faith, j
Repentance the fpeciall gift of God. ^ j
21 & J.24, 15
Repentance part of the Gofpcl. }. J.i
Rtpentanceis no Sacramct.4.i5>.i4.i 5
Repentance the efttft of it. j.j 1 5,iiJ
Repentance IS not in God. 1. 17.11
Hcpcntaceof Achab. 3. J.25.& 3.2C.15
ReprelienlTons to lawbreakers. 2.5.11
Reprobation is by the will of God. j,
12,1 1
Reprobates hateful] to God. 3.24.16
Reprobates are without cxcufc whett
they dofinne. 3-13 9
Reprobats feare not God as they ought
to do. 3.i.*7
Reprobates faith- |. 2.11,11
Reprobates miferableeftate* 3.25.^
Reprobates shalbe greuoufly punished
3.25.1*
Reprobates may and caahcaic Gods
word. ^i»$
RKRR iij
The Tabic.
Rcfiirrcdfon oFClirifV. i.i 6.i 3
Rcfurrcdlion of the fleshe ishardlyto
bebeleucd. S'^S.J
Rc'.urredioij ii common to the good &
theeuill. h^$-9
Rerurre<SionshaIbe in amaruclous or-
der. J. 25.8
Reuclation of foolish ph^natikcs. 1^9.1
Reuengmg is to be left to God. 2.8. 57
& 4 20. JO
Reucnging luiles are forbiden. Ibidem.
Rome IS not che head of all Churches.
4.7 (7
Romish Bishops do vainly ch^Iege the
fuccefijon of the Apoltles to theicl-
ucs only, 4^2, J
S,
SAbaochthctruekecpingcofit. 2.8
28
Sabaoth ho we abolished by the com -
mingofChrift. z.S.^i
Sabellius the licretike confuted. 1. 1 j. 4
Sacrament , the lignification of it. 4.14
I
Sacrament is not without promifc. 4
Sacrament the generall fignification of
it. 4.(4 t ^
Sacramets are only two in the church,
4.«4 ZO.& 4,18.20
Sacraments be m.iny by the iudgement
of fchoolemen. 4. ' i> >
Sacraments how to be vfed, 4.1 4.1 j
Sacramcnccsof the la we , differ from
theniof tbeGolpels. 4.14,23,26
Sacrifice acceptablf tp God J 7»'
Sacrifice, the vfc of It. 2.-.i,i7,& 2.1a
4
Sacrificeofthe faithfull, 4.18,4,16
Saducees opinion of Angels, i.i4-9
Sadiicees opinion of Ton Ics. 1.15.2
Saducees are confuted. 2,10 2 j & 3.2$
.5
Salaation commcth of God<^eledion.
5-H4>5
Saluatipn of the faithtiill is fuiiy in
Chrift. zi6.ip
Saluationfourccaufes of it. 3 14.17,21
Sampfon hovve he offended God in re -
ucnging. ).20.i5
San^limony of life is the endc of e-
ledlion. 3»Ji»
Sandify jngc of Gods namc,vvhat it is,
5.20.4c
Sara,her offence, 3«J«JJ
Sathan the author of finne, i.i 4.15
Sathan the author of ftrife. 4 >?•«
Sathan haih diuerfe names. i.i4.'5
Satiianis called the fpiritof God.2.4.5
Satnanthc niinifter of Gods vvrath Sc
punishment, ii8.2.&24.2
Sathan counterfaitcth God. 1.82 & 4
14.19
Sathan can do nothingebut by Gods
i'uft.Tance. 1.14. 17.& 1.17.7
Sathan en not hurt the Church as he
would. I 14.18
Sathaiis craft and guile. } 20,4<?.& 4
i,i,xi.i3.& 4 i4.i5> & 4 1 5.ii>.8c 4
16.32 & 4 17.1 2 & 4.i8.iiJ
Satisfaftion dcuifed by the p.ipifles or
fophidcs j.4.2S.t<f J. 16 4
Saindesare fomtimcs afraid of the pre-
frnceofGod. I -J* J
Sainftes dcadc, whether they pray for
vs. J. 20. 24
Schifinptjke.'! who be properly. 4 2.5
Scope of the fatthftiU. 2.10.11,6c 3.25
Scripture I ringc':h all menne to the
knovviedgeof God. 1.6. 1
Scripture makethmcntio of the church
two v\ ayes. 4. 1.7
Scripture though it recmcfimple,yct is
of great e/lunation 1 . 8.1
Scripture is very frutcfull. 1 .^.1
Sclaunderinges c<indemned. 2.jB 47
State of Chrift at the right hand of the
father. 2.1615,
Sedes ofMonkes are peiillous. 4.1 3,14
Scede of the law is inall men. 2. J.i ^
Sccde of religion in the mindc of man,
i.3.1 ,& I 5.1
Seneca, 2.2.3. & ? ^-4
St-neca.'; opinion of Idols. 1.1 1.2
Senfes in manbefiue, i.i 5.^
Senfeof /ods diuinity is grauen in mas
hart 1. 2.3. &i. 3. 1
Sephorahow shecircucifed her fonnc
415 22
Seructtus. 4.16.30
Scruantes, their office, 2846
Shauing
Sliauing of crovvnes.
Signes of repentance as be out ward. 4
x2.14.17
Symboleofthc Apoftles. 1.16. 18
Simon Magus faith. 5.2.10
Simony, what it fignificth. 45.6
The Tabic.
4.15.16,27 buppcrofthe Lord hovve it was inlW-
tuted. 1.17.1,20
Supper of thcLorde ftandcthintwo
poiiues. 4.17.11,14
Supper ofihe Lord hovve to be vied. ^
25.3
Simphcity of tl^e Scripture is of great Supper of the Lordc miniftred i.n time
force. i.8.1 paft ro children. 4.16.50
Singing brought into the Church. 3,20 Supper of the Lord abufed anddcfiJcd
31
Singlehfe. 2.8.4j.8c 4ria.i6.8c4.i j
18
Sinne original]. 2. 1. 5, 8. & 4. 15.10
Sjnne againft the holy Ghoft. 5.5 22
Sinne veniall after the papiiUs. 2 8. 58
Sinne vvhatfoeueric bcitis mortall it
felfe. 2.8.55
Sinnes are oftvvo fortes. 4.13.;,^
Sinnes, why they be called dettes. 3
20.45
Sinnes ofthe fathers how they be pu-
nished in the Tonnes. 3.8.15,20
Sinnes of holy men are vcniall. 2.JJ.S5
m tVje Popish Church.
T.
i..il«
fpEmples thevfeofthem.3.io.30.&' 4
Temples ofthe Egyptians fpoyled and
burned by Xerxes 4 *-5
Tempjts fupcifliioufly decked. 4. 5.1S
Tetarios areofdiuerfc fortes, j. 20.46
Tempt God, what ii fignifieth. 4.1 j. j
Tertullian. 1. 10. 3. & 1-15.6,28. & 2.14
y.Sc 3.20.48.& J. 25.7.3: 4.15.21.&4
17.25,48
Teftamcnt the old cofirmed by Chrilt.
2.10.4
Sinnes not forgiuen out ofthe Cuurch. Teftament the oldc and ncvve,in what
things they agree. 2.10. i
Theft forbidden. *.8 45
Theft committed diucrfc vvayes. Ibi-
dem.
Ihcodofius Bishop ofMiria. i.ii.iy
Theodofius the Empcrour cofefTed his
finne. 4'^i-7
TheoJorus the Bishop. 1.11.14
Trcafurcof the Church, what it is af-
ter the Papiftes mindes. J'5-?
Thomas Aquinas. 3.2.4.& 3.22.5
Titles of the holy Ghoft. ■ j.i,}
Tranfubftantiation deuifed by thePa-
piAes. 4.i7.i2,i4>i $
Tributes due to be payed to Princes. 4
20.1f
Trinity ofperfonsinGod. i.i 3.1,3, 3,
4
3-13 4
4» «
4 I.20.
Sinnes can not be numbrcd particu-
larly. 3 4.16.18
Sinners betake fordi/Tolute andloofc
' men. 3.20.10
Slaunderous vvordes condemned. 2.8
47
Sobrietie neceilarie to the faythfull. i
9 3
Solon. 4.20 5
Sunne worshipped ofthe Perfians. 1 .1 1
I
Sophiftes faith intricate. 3.2.2
Sorrow is of two kindes. 3.3.7. &: 34
2
Stoikes opinion of neccffity. 1.16.8
Subdeacons in the ' hurch. 4 4 «c>
Subdeacons in Popery. 4.15.53
Subcility of Gregory the fcucp,:h. 4. i 1 Trueth and mercy conioyned.
I 3 True Church.
Summe of the law. 2 8.11 True Church diffcreth from the falfe.
Summc ofthe Gofpell. 3.3.1,15. 4.2.1
Sup«rftition, the beginning of it. i.i 2.1 Turkes do appointldols in place ofthe
Superftitiodiffcrethfrom true religion, true Iming God. 2.6.4
I.I 2 I V.
SupcrftitionshovYCtheymaybeabro- X/'Alla. J-*3-^
gated. 3.8.i< Varro. i.ii.6
RRRR iiij
inc 1
Vengeance is to be left to God. 1.8.57
& 4.20.20
Vcrcue of the faithfiill. 25.5
Virg:Il. 1.5.5
Vocation of cuery ml is to be confide -
red jao.6
Vocation is of two fortes. J ^4 **
Vocation of th« faithfull to what end.
3 tf.2.&:.j.i5.i
Vocation ofpaftors is in foure pointes.
4 J. II
Vow, what it is 4»?-t
VoYveotHnglc life, 4.1 3.1 8
Vowcof lephches. 4.1 j j.
Vowe of charity 41^.26
Vo wes of faithfull, is in foure poyntes
4- 3-*
Vowes ofMonkes arefoolishe.4.1 jj,
17
Vbwcs foolishearenot tobekcpt. 4
13.20
Vn^ionisnofacramcnt. 4.19.18
Vndcrftanding & Will are two partes
ofthcfoule. iJ^S-?
Viideritandingcioyncd with faith. 3 2
Vfc of exhortation. a»^5
Vfe of the Lordci Supper. }. 15.^
Vfc offaiting. ?'J '7
Vfeofthslaw. 1. 12.1. & 2. 71
Vfeof Godi promifc to the good and
euill. 2. J- 10
vrcof<acr3mcntes. 4.14 13
Vfeoffacrifice. 2.7. i, 17. & 2 12.14
VV.
WEmcn comprehended rnder the
name of men. 2..13.3
VVemenmaynot baptife. 4.15.30
Whoredom vtterly forbidden. 2 8.41
Wicked ate indurated with Gods pu-
nishments. 3 4,32 5: 3.8, <5
VVick;d arc fometimts endued with
exctllenc and good gihs. 3.14.2,3
aDic.
VVidowcf *ged and their finglel ife.^
13.18
Will of God is plaine and ^mple. 3 .24
16
V VilJ of God to be cofidered two ma-
ncrofwaycs. i-t7.s
VViiofGodcaufeofall thingcs. i.t 4.1
&1.16.8 &i.17.2.&m8.»
VVil of God the neccffity of al things,
3 23.8
Will of God alwayestobe followed,
3 20.4}
Will of God rule of luHicc. 323."}
Wil ofman ho wit is abolished in the
regenerate. a- $.15
V Vill Sc Vnderftanding are two parts
of the foule. i.i 5.7
VVillotmanis in Gods hande.2 4.6,7
VVifdoci the true. i.r.i
VVorkes oi the holy Ghoft. 4.148,9
VVorkes donotiuftifie. 3.17x1
VVorkes ofthe Hcsheproceedc of ori-
ginal fin.ie. 4.15.10
VVorkes of fupererogation, 3 14.14
VVorkes, theiriullice. ?.i8.i
VVorkcsgoodcome cf Gods grace, a
VVorkes gcod come af faith. 4.1 3.^0
World was made for roans ende- 1.1(5
'yFnophon. x. 5. ia.& 4.12.2*
•^Xerxes 'pnylcdand burned the Tem
pie* of Egypt. 4*»'5
ZAcharias the Popes falfchoode. 4.7
If
Zeals , howc it is ftirrcd vp ofrepen-
tanrc. 3 ?••$
Zepherincs conUitution for celebra-
ting of MaiTc. 4.17.4^
Zephora howc she circumcifed her
. fbnne. 4.1 5. }a
AN
AN OTH ER TABL E IN
vvhich are contained the places of the
Bible according to the courfe of the
olde and new Teftament.
If at any time you dopnde txoo numbers in the margem,the fjrfljtgnipeth the
chapter of the B^hie,the fecondjhcrveth the Verfe of the fame Lhapter:buf
ifyoufnde one number alone.then thatjignifeth the Vcrfe onely.Thefirji
number fut after the text fignifeth the Bookie of the Injiittttions ^ the fe^
fond the Chajpter, and the third the Se£fion,
I.I.
s.
N E S 1 S.
>J :he beginning god
created heauc and
earth. » 14 iO
And the fpirite of
god was vpon the
deepcs. 1.T5.14.& «.I j.ai
|. And God faid, let light be made, &
light was. I.I 3. 7. & T.i j.S.Sci.iS.i
II. Let the earth fhootc forth grecnc
florifhing herbes , and bearing fcede
according ro his kinde. 1.16.J.
t6. Let vs make man to our image and
likcncfTc. I.I 3. 24,^ I 15.3
37. And God created man to his image
and fimilitudc, he created them to
the image oi God , male and female.
i.u i4.§c 1.15-3 & '•••*
38 And rule you oucr thefirhcs of the
fea,6< cuer the fovvles of the hcaue,
and oucr eucry bcaft that moueth on
thccarch. 1.14.2a.
jt. And God favv all things that he
ha J made , and they were exceding
good And Eucning & Mortiing was
madcthe fixtcday.i 14.22. & 3.23.8
a. I. Therefore heaucn and earth vv:5S
finifhtd , and all the garnifhing of
them. I'i4«4
a. God did throughly finifhc the 7.
day his vvorke that he had made, and
herclted the 7. day fro all the workc
t'larhe had done. 1.14.25^28.30
7. Th« Lord God cherfore did Uihmtk
man of the (lime of the earth, and m-
(pired into his figure the breth of
lif^, and man vva& made into a Iming
foulf. i.i5.5.&2.H^
J. And thetrccoflifevvasin tbemid*
deft of Paradife , and the tree of the
knowledge of good &euill. 4. 14.18
17- Inrvhac day ibeueryoufballeacc
thereof, you Oiall dy with death.
32.7
1 8. Tt is not good that man be alone,
let J vs make rtim a helpe like to htm-
felfe. 4«M
23. Thi5,novv bones of my bones, and
flefhofmyflcfh^fhe f hall be called
woman jbecauic (he was taken of
man. 2.12.7 & 4.15). jj
3,4. The Serpent faid to the vvona,
yc fhallnot dy. 1.14.15
6. Ihcrfcre the woman faw that the
tree vv.is good to eatc, & beautiful!
to the cyu , and pleafaunt to looke
vpon.Sc I hetokeofthefrntetherof,
and 6\6. cate, and didgeuc to her
huf b-ind, vvhich did cate. 2,1.4
15. I will put hatred bctvvenc the*
and the woman, bctvvenc thy fecde
and the fcede of her , f he fhall brufe
fmall thy head , and thou fhalt lay
vvaitetuintrappehisheele. 1*14.. 8
& 2.1 j.X
17, In thy labours thou fhalt eata
thereof ail the dayes of thy life. 3.14
I5.&2»IO.IO*
The
»j. Novve 'therefore leaft he ftretch
forth his hand , and take a!fo oi^che
trecof hftf^andeatt thereof and liue
foreucr,lct vs cail him out. 4.14.12
4.4. And the Lord had regard to Abell
andtohisgifces« 3'>4*^
7. And her define fhalbe fubieft vnco
thec , and thou flialt bs Lordc ouer
it,or thou f halt rule ouerit. i.ij.i^
8. And vvhcntiiey were in the field,
Cain rofe vp againft his brother A-
bdl,and nuehim. 2. 10. 10
10. The Toicc of the blood of thy bro-
ther , cricth vnto me trom the earth.
I J. My iniquitie is greater then that
I may gette pardon. 3'?4
6.3. My fpiritc f hall not abide in man
forcuerjbecaufehe is flelh, Sec. 5,14.1
5. But the Lorde feing that there was
much vvickedncRe of men on the
earth, & that eueiy thought of their
hartes was bent to euili at ail times,
6. Then it repented the Lorde that he
had made man on the earth. 1.17.11
18. 1 will make my couenaunt with
thee. 4.i4.<5
a a. Noe made all things that the Lord
had commauiided him. a.io.io
S.ji. The vnderftauJing & thought of
mans hart, be prone to euill fro their
youth. i 2.25.& 2.2 ;7.& 3 14.1
$ X, And the ft sre and dread of you be
vppon all be.ifts of the earth, and vp -
pon all birdes o! the aire, with eiiery
riling that moueth vppon the earth,
all the hfhe of the fea begeucnto
yourhanJes. 1.14.22
5 Behnlde,! do ordaine my couenaunt
vYiihyuu,aad with your fecde after
you. 4,14.6
I 3. i will put my bowe in the cloudes,
and it fhall be a iigne of the league
betweneme & betwene the earth.
4.»4.i8
>4. Put Noe being awaked from his
wine, when he had learned what
his youngcft foniie had done vnto
fcim. a.iq 10
»5. Kc faid , cuiftd be Chanaan , he
Table.
fhall be a feruaunt of feruauntes to
his brethren. 1.11.8
2 7. Let God inlarge laphet, and leC
Sem dwell in Tabernacles, and let
chanaan be his feruaunt. i.ii.S
124. Therefore Abraham went forth
as the Lorde had commauncjed him.
2.10.11
I o. But there was a dearth in the land,
and Abraha Went dovvn into Egypc
that he might dwell there, i.io. n
1 3. bay therfore I pray ihcc,that thou
art my filter. i.io.n
17 But the Lordc did punifhc Pharao
and his houfe for Sara the wife of
Abraham 2.8,ip
137- And there rofea ftrife betvvene
the fhepeheardes of the flocke of
Abraham , and the fhepeheardes of
theflockcs of Loch. 2.10. n
II. And the one of them were f^pa-
rateu from his brothir 2.10.11
14.15 And beholdeone thatcfcaped
toldeit to Abraha the Hebrue. 2.10. Jl
it. But Melchifedec king of Salem,
brin M'ng forth bread and wine (for
he was the pricft of the almighty^
&c. 4.ii$.i
15. 1. Fcarenot Abraha,Iam thydcfeii
der,and"cnyrcvvardis very great .z
II.I.& 3,z5-io.& 4.iaii.&4i<f.24
J. Locke vp vpon the hcauens,and
number the Itarres if thou canft:and
he faid vnto him , fo fhall thy feedc
be. 3.18 »
17. Therefore when theSunnewas
fette there rofe a darke mifte , and
there appeared a fmoking foruacg,
&c. 4.!4.i8
18. I will gcue vnto thy feede this
coutruy, from the flud of Egypt vnto
the great flud Euphrates. 4 i5.ii
16.2. Beh()lde,the Lorde both f hut me
vp ,that I fhoulde not brnge forth:
gothouintorhy handmaid. ifperad-
uer.ture at the leatt,&c. 3 .2. j 1.
5, And barai faid to Abraham , thou
dealell vniuftly withme. 2.« o.ii»
Igauc my handcmaide into thy bo-
fome. ? *'3*
^. And the Angell of the Lorde faid
The Tabic.
vnto her,returne vnro thy miftrerte.
1.14 16
I 5. Agar brought forth a fonne to A-
brjham, z.io.ii
17. ». I will make my agreement be-
tvveneme and thee, and I will mul-
tiply thee wonderfull much. 5.18 1
5. I hatte ordained thee a father of
many Nations. 2.10 11
y, Atid 1 will put mycouenauntbe-
twcnc me and thee, and becvvcnc
thy feedc after thee iu their genera-
tions by Jin euerlafling truce , that I
maybe rhy God and the God of thy
fecdeaftcr thee. 2.8.21.& 2. t 0.9 & 2
15 I. & 4.1 5.20.& 4.16.5
10. Eucrymaleofyou fhall be circum-
cifed 4.14- 20.& 4.1 tf.?
11. And you fhall circumcife thcflel h
ofyour vncircumcifion, and it fh^ll
bcafigne of the league betweneme
an-iyou 4.16.24
11. The child of S.ddyes fhall becir-
cumciftd amongcftyou , eusry male
in your generations. 4,i6.5.& 4.16.6
& 4.16.^0
I :{. And my couenant fhall be in vour
flefhforan euerlafting league. 4.17.22
X4 The male, the flefhe ofwhoCe
vncircumcifion hath not bene cir-
ciimci fed, that foulc fh;Ul be wiped
out fro amongeft his people, becaufe
hehathbrGkenmycouenaunt.4. 6,^
ji. I vvill ordaine my couenaunt with
Ifaac. 4145
iS.i. The Lorde appeared vntf>h!min
the valley of M^mre. i M-V
2. There were three men appeared
vnto him landing by him. i 14.9
1.0. Returning, I will come vnto thee
about this time, and thy wife Sarai
fhsllh-uea fof.ne. j.iS.i
a J. If th-re rhall be 50. iufte in the
Citie,fh3ll theyperifhc alfoP-Sc wile
thon not fparc th.u place for 50,
iuite, i*^ theyrhil! be in n} J. 20. 15
tj, Becaufe ( haue begone once, fhall
J fpeak* vnto my Lorde, being duUe
andafhcs? i.i.j
i|lt^i. And two Angeli came tp So-
4ome in the cucntng« iti4 p
20.2. And he faid of Sarai his rvife,
fhcis myfifter. 2 lo.n
J. Whether or no vvill thou die for
the woma which thou broughteit?
for f he hath a huf band. 1.17. 14
18. For God did Ihutte vp euery
worribeot thehoufeof Abimelcch,
for Sarai the wife of Abraha 2.8.i5>
21.2. And S.uai c«ioccaued,and bare a
fonne to Abraham in her age. 2.10.11
10. Caft out this handmaide .ind her
fonne. 2.10.1 1>& 4. z- j
12. All things that Sarai shall fay vnto
thee,harke vnto her,bccaufc in Ifaac
fhall thyiec-de be called 3.2 2. J
24. And Abrahan\ faid, I vvill fweare,
2.8.27
25. And Abraham blamed Abimelcch
for the well i»f water which his
fcruauntes tooke away by force.
2 10. If
22.1. The which after they were,
done, God tempted Abraham. 3.8.4
& ^.20.4^1
a. Take thou thy onely fonne Ifaac,
vvhnm thou loueft, and goe into the
land of virions , and offer him in fa-
crifice. a.io.n
3. Therfore Abraham rifing by night,
fadlcd his Arte .carrying with him
tvvo young men and his ionnc 1 faac,
and when they h^d cut vvoddefor
faciifice , he vvent into the place
that God had commaunded h'm. j
l3 2
8- My fonne, God vvill prouide to hioi-
X fclfc an offering of (acri^ce. 1.164
11. Novvel knovve tliatthou fta^efi
the Lorde. and hjft not fparedthy
oncIy fonne for me. ^84
16. I haue fvvorne by mv felfe fiaith
the Lorde j becaufe thou haft done
this thing, and haft not fparcd thy
onely fonne, &c. J.iS.i
17. I will bieffe thee, and multiply
thy feede as the Itarres of heauen^
and as the fand that is by the fhore
ofthefea. j 18.2
18. And all the natiosofthe earth fhall
be blelVed in thy (cede , becaufe thou
obeyedftmy voice. z.i3.(,$ 4.(4.11
The
3^.4. I am a llraunger and pilufime
among youjgeuc mc the right of bu-
liall with you , that I may burie my
dead. .^i5•8
7. Abraham arofejanddid vvorfliip
the people of that countrey, that is
to(ay,th«ronnesof Heth. 1.12.3
S2. Abraham did vvorfhip before ihe
Lordcand the people of that coun-
trcy. I.I a. J
15, And Abraham buried his wife
Sara in the double ctue of the field,
which cauc was right oueragainil
l^amre, this is Hebron in the land of
Canaan« ).2S«8
24.7. He will fende his Angell before
thee. 1,14.6, dc 1.1412
12. Lord God of my maiiler Abraham,
helpcme thisdaye,and deaiemerci*
fully with my maifter Abraham, t.
I 4.12
25.27. Ifaac loued EfaUjbecaufe he
dideateofhis Venifon. 32.31
%6.i. Adearth being rifen in that lad,
after that barrenncrt'e which hap-
pened in the dayes of Abraham:lCiac
went to Abimiiech king of Paleftine
inOerara. 2.10 12
4. And I will multiply thy fecdeas
the ftarres of heauc»and 1 will geue
to thy poUcritie all thefe regions,
and all nations fhali be bleJTed in thy
fcde. 2.1 J. I
7. And he auMfwcred/hc is my fifter,
for he feared tocofcffe that f he was
aHociated vnto^m inmariage. 2.
i^ iOI2
I 5. For this , the Palettines enuying
h5m,they dammed vp all the wels
that the feruauntcs of his father A-
bramhad dig«cd, at that time filling
tncm vp vnch earth. 2.10 it
20. But »^ere alfo was a brawling of
the f hepejieardes of Geraraagainll
the fhepeheardes of Ifaac, 2.io.ix
31. And rKing in the morning, they
fwore one to the other. 2,8.27
3 5- VVhich-btt^h did offend the minde
of IfaacAjd Rebecca. 2.10.1 1
27. 5>- C|ffthy vY.iyes forth to the
fiockc rBcbring vncometwogood
Tabic.
K/ddes,3rc, ?.».)«
14. He went and brought, and gaue
vnto his mother. 2.10.14
27. So ioone as he fented the fmell of
his garmentes, blefling him, he faid,
beholde the fmell of my (bnne as the
fmell of a full field the which the
LordehathblcfTed. 3. 11.2 j
38, Efauwitha great houling wrpt,
35). Thy blefling fhall exceedc mthe
fatncrtcof thcearth,&inihe dewe
ofheauen. 5325,
38,5. Ifaac therefore let Tacob depart.
2.IO.I 2
II. An ha fawc inhis fleepe a ladder
Ibnding on the earth , and the top
thcreoftouching hciiuen. j.y.a
l>. Andalfothe Angels of God going
vpand going downe by the way.
1. 14. 12
18. lacob therefore riffng early, tooke
the ftone vvhich he did lay vndcr
his head, and he reared it vp for a rc-
membraunce,pouring oile therupon,
1. 11,15
22. I will offer the tenthes vnto thee,
of all things that thou fhalt gcuc me,
4-«3-4
25. 20. lacob ferued for Rachel I 7.
yeares. 2.10.11
23. And in the euening he brought in
Lcliahis daughter to lacob. 2.10.12
27. Fill vppe the vvctke of dayes of
this coupling, and 1 will geue her
vnto thee for the vvorkc by vvhich
thou rhalt feruc me in 7.othcr ycarea
2.10 IS
jo.T. ButRachell feingthat fhe was
vnfrutefuU , fhe enuied her fifter,
andfaid vnto her huf band, geue me
children, othcrvvife I will die. 2.
10. 12..
». Whether or no am I a God that
hacVi taken from thee the frute of
thy vvombc? 1.167
31.19. And Rachell Hole avvay'the
Idoles of her father. i.ii 8
2 J. Who tookc his brethre vnto him,
and following after him 7. daies , he
tooke him in the mouc Cilead. 2.10.1 2
40. Day
The Tabic.
40. Day and nJghr 1 was opprciied
with hcate & coldc,and{lccpc was
farre from mine eyes 2. 10. 12
55. Therefore lacob fwore by the
f^areofhis f^jthcr Ititar. 2.8.27
52.f. lacob went on ihciourney that
he had taken in handc,& the Angels
* ofthe Lord met hnn. J.I4-5
7. lacob feared vyonderfully,8:c. 2
10.12
10. I am not worthy of thekaft of
all thy conipalTions, & all the trueth
which thou hail shewed vntothy
feruaunt: for withmyltaffc hauel
paHcdouer thislordan.5.20.14 & }
20.26
tl. Deliuer me from the handc of my
brother F.fau,bccaure Tfcare him ve-
ry much, leait he comming, do Itrjkc
the mother with her Tonnes. 2.10.12
& 5.20.14
a8. For if thou were ftronge agamft
God , howe much m<?rcshalt thou
prcu.iile.igviinltmen? ».'4-$
»5). lacob .isked him, tell me what 1$
thy name ? he aunfwercdjVvhy doft
thou (cekeafccrrnyn.^aie the which
is maruelous?andhe bieifedhimin
that place. i.i^.io
30. And lacob called ihc n^me of that
place Phanueli, fayir.ge , 1 fawc the
Lord face to facC}& my foule is fafe.
1. 13 10
IJ.j And he going foorth worship-
ped proftirate on the earth feuen
times, vntill his brother drcwe nie.
2.10.1 2
54.5 lacob vndcrflode that he had ra-
uishedhis daughter Dina. 2. 10. 12
%y Simeon and Lcui the brethren of
Dina went into the Citie boldcly
with their fwordcs, and al thse male
beirgil.iine,&c. 2.i0.ia.& 4.1.24
19. You haue troubled me , andhaue
made me be hated of the Chananires
& Pharefitcsinhabitersof this con-
trey, a.io.ia
jj.iS But her foule departinge for
greefc,& death bemg now at hand
she called,&c. 2.10.12
ta* Ruben wcntyandflepcwuhBaU
the Cocubineofhis father, that VTM
notvnknoWcn vntohiro. 2.10. i&
& 4.1.24
37. 28. And the Madianites Mar-
chaunts palling by, they drew him
out of the Ccltcrne, they Coldc him
to the Ifmaelitcs for 2o.peeces of
fiiuer money. 4'.*4
5 2. They tookc his coate,fending the
which bare it tohis father,&c.2,io
la
38,18 Therefore the VYomanconcei*
Ued at one copulation, &c. 2.1011
& 4 ».H
42, tf. The brethren of lofcph tame 5c
did reucrencc vntohim,- i.i«.|
jtf. Youhaucmadcmetobc withouc
childrc: lofcph is not aliue any more,
Simeon is holden in chaines , & yoa
cary Beniamin away: all thefeeuils
hath fallen on me. s.tr.ia
4}. 14. MyomnipotetGod.makehim
fauorable towards you^and that he
let loofe with you your brother
that he holdethin chaines and this
Bcniamin : for T shalbe as one deili
tute without children. 2.4.^
45.8. I was not Tent hither by your
counfell, but by the will of God.t
17.1
47.7. And lacob faiucedPharao. i.u
5>. The daics of pilgr image of my life
be 1 jo.yeares:fevvand euill 2.tc.i»
And they came notvtio the daycs of
my fatbsvSjinthcJivJiich ihey were
pilgrimi-s, ^ 2.10.1 J
29. Thou sho'ltkce^epromife & shale
deale pitifully with me, thacthoU
bury me not in Egypt. 2.io.i.|
50 But I will fleepe with my fa-
thers , and thou shale cary me from
this contrey, and put tht;u»ir-e in the
fcpultrcofmy AunceftoJS- 2.10. 15
31. Who fwcarJng, Ifraall worship-
ped the Lord, turning to the head of
the bed • i.ti.15
48.14. And Tfracllliretcbingeouthia
right hande, put it on i^bcad of B-
phraim. 4J.i«
The Tabic.
1^. The Anjrell \-Thich hath Jchucrcd
mc from a J cuils , bJcJlc thetc bovcs.
And Ice the names of mv hithcrs Abrj-
lum iad Ifjac be called vpon them.
;.3o. ss
I p. But his vv>una:er brother sKjU be
jjrcjccr thcnnc , an < his Tccdc sha'l
grovT into nations. 3-i»5
4P S. Sim;on ^ I cm brothers . vv.:r-
l.ke vctr^Is of ;n"»q.i::y. i 84
5. ludathe vvhclp ofa Lyo.my fonne
thou afcendcftta the pr.»v , beinge
ftiUthou diviicfi Ivc js J I v«)n, and
asashc Lvon; vvhoshailrjile thee ?
1.S4
10. ""he Sccpcff >ha!! nv-'t be carrtcd
avvjy from iuia, nt:t'i;r the Cap-
cainehx>mhi> honje» vnciUhecoaie
that IS to be fent. ^ hesh^JI be that
the C>eiit lies K»t'KeNT. 1.4.7
iS- 1 will looke ror thy faluatioii O
lord. a. 10. '4
50.10. Youhaue :rra;;:ncd euill of me
bnt God T\ '.11 rurnc chat :nto good,
that hemi^ exalc me as vou fee
pritentlv. i 1-.8
a5, V Vhcn God shsIJ vifitCTou, cary
avvav \ rjth vou my booestirom this
place. s.io.i}
E X O D V S.
3»j:. « ■^-'Hc.i he looked here and
^ * there, and Urve that no
b ^dv TTa-" prefcnt , he hiJthe E£\'p-
tiiv\hiwhhertroke, orkillcJ.in the
faod. 4 3v->. 10
j.> And the Lord xppcarcd vnrohim
in a fiance of fre from the middcft of
abr.imb;e bush. 41-. 21
^ I arn tr-e wod of thy father.rhc God
of Abrar-am , the God I liaac , the
Goiotljvob. i.8M ^^: 3.10.9
t. I Siur cornedownerhjt I mav Jc
liuer thcmf^om rh* hojides of the E-
jr-"t»^-a ""san { t^^at 1 may bring them
out of chit conrtcv. 4.2!>.;o
10. Bjt I ca:ne, that I might fend f^ee
toPharan.chat tlKHiniigStctt lead a-
Trav ny people. 4 8.»
14. S Vhi;h IS, let me vRtoyou.i.ij.j;
aj. I vvUgiucfdu^urTQCwCCis people
before the Fgyptians, & rrken vou go
forth you shall not go tortli cmptV.
1-17.7
4*;. And rise Lord laydjthroweiton
the eartk, he threw ic , and it v\ as
turned into a fr.ake. 4.>t.i5
II. who hach made the mouth of rri,
or who hath framcc the oumtre and
dcaic, the fccit>gc & the bhndc ? not
1? II , 14
21. See thoQ do all things openlv be-
fore Pharao which Ihaucput in;a
thvhai.des.I will harden his hart,&
he shall i.ot let the {>euple §0. 2.4. 4
Si ?.X4 ij
I vTil hjrdcn his hart,&: he shall roe
let the people go. i.i?.»
2v Scphoia toiike therefore a >harp
rtone, and circumcilcd the vnc;rcu-
Cifion ot'her tonne. 4. ic.:a
6. J. And I vvill take you vnco me for
a people, & I vvil be vour God. 2 10 J
a J. Aaron cooke EliTab,.th to wife
thp d.ji.-^hterof Aminao-b the lifter
cfNahaion. vvhich bare vutohjoi
Nadab , and nbiu, and EJcazar, and
Ithamjr >•* ? 5
7.1 . And the Lorde favd vnto .Mufcs,
bsholde , I haue ordained thtc rhc
god of Pharao, and Aaroif ihv bro-
ther sHjI! be thy Prophet. it 1-9
J. But 1 rrill harden hiv hart,.^nu wil
n-.altiply mv %nc$ and wonders in
thclaude of Egypt. i.i8 2 5:}-4-S
6: 2.4.4
lO Aaron cooke his rod before Pha-
rao ^ h:s feriuntes, iSi it was turned
int'^ainake. 4.1 -.15
lu Phi-ao called his Tvife men & m-
chaunters , and they trade vnto him
likevvifeceitaire vvonders through
E?vp<iecaH inchaun:emen:<- i S tf
la. And thjy in like maner cai*t foorth
their rods, vThich were turned in-
to JriSi^ns. but the rod ol Aaron dc-
uo^ired the.r ri>ds. 4.17. 15
815. But pKirao feeing that ouiernes
was eiccn him , he made his hart
woffe. m8 1
lo.i And the Lorde favd vnto Mofcs,
go ia voto Pharao : for liuue hard-
lied
The Table.
hardened hi? hart, ard the harts of
hisreruaunts,that Irr.ay makethefc
tokens on him. J«4~4
li.j. The Lordc will giuc fauourto
his jpet>plc before the Egyptias. And
Moics was a great man in the con-
trey of Egypt before thefcruantsof
I harao & all the people. 2.4 <J
1*5. It vvasaLambervithout Tpot, a
he T ambe oFa ycare olde. 4. (^«^i
a6. And when your children shall fay
vnto you, what religion is this?4.i6
4 J. This is thcreligioof paffingouer,
eueryltraungershallnoccacc there-
of. 4.17.21
46. Neither shal you breake the bones
thereof. 1.15.9
13.12. SanSifie to me euery firll borne
that doch ope the vvr,mbe amogcft
the children of irr.jcll,as well ofmc
as ofbeaft,fc>r they b« al mine. 4. 16. ji
14.19. And the Angell of the Lnrdc,
liftinge vphimfclfc, which did goe
before the campe of Ifrad jVvcnt af-
ter them. 1.14.^
ai. And when Mofes had extended
his hande egainft the fea , the Lorde
tooke it away, a mightie vvindc
blowing and burningc all the night.
&c. • 4.155
i€. And the Lordc fayd vnro Mofes,
ftretch out thy hande ouerthefca,
t\izt the waters tray rcrurne to the
Egyptians & vpon the chariots and
horicmen ofthcm. 4.15.9
J!. The people feared the Lordc and
bcleued innim, and inhis feruaunt
Muft-s. 4.8.2
15.?. The Lord as a champion, omni -
potent is his name. 1. 1 5.24 & 4.17 23
X6.7 And in the morningc v<iu shall
fe the glory of the lord, I hauc heard
you murmuring againlt the Lord:But
we, what be vve that you do mur-
mureagainft vs priuily. 1.8.5
14. And when the dew was afcedcd
that was fallen , beholde vppon tnc
vpper part of the earth there appra-
reda litle thinge in a manner of the
likeacs,&c. 4.17.34 &4. 18. 20
17.6. BehoIdc,TTvillftande there be-
ffre thee vpon the rocke horeb,an4
thou ^haltUnke the rocke, and wa-
ter jhail proceeds there from , that
the people may drinke. 4 17.1 5.& 4
17.21. &4 1 iJ.20
15. And .Mo^esdid build an altar,an<i
called the name x.\\cxtoilthouah-N:fi
l8.i<J. And when there shall beany
diiputation amongrft them , thcf
ihall con^ vnt«imc,rhat I may iudge
betwer'e thciT,i!-' that I may sherve
the commaunJenocnts of God & his
lawes. 4 II S
15.5. Youshal be vnto mea? the tre-
fure and belt ofall the people,for ail
the earth is mine. 4.15.11
6. And youshal be vnto me akingcly
PriefLhodc,.ind a holy people- 2.7.1
i6. AndnovY the third day vvas come,
anditvvaxcd bright in the morning,
and behcldc thundering begannc to
be hard, and lio-hceninges to flaihc,
and thicke cloudes to couer the hilJ,
«nd the {oMnii of the trompet did
m^ke a noyfe very vehemently, a.Tl
the people did fcare which were >a
thcter.tes, 1.8.5
20. J Thou flialt cot haue /Irjunge
gods before rrc. i.ij 24
4. Ihnushait not make to thy (tiicz
grauen iirage, neither any likcnefl'e
that u in heaaen aboue the earrh,
neither that is in the earrh beneath,
neicherof thoie thinges tha: be :n
the wattrs beneath the earth. I \ > .%
& i.if .1 2 & i.f ^.24
5. Thou shalrne;ther worship them
nor ferue the: I am thy mighty Lord
God,8e!ioii<,viiTting the iniquity of
the fathers vp6 'hc children, tcjthe
th;rd and fourth generatios of thcni
thatnteme. 1.1 2.1
6 And being mcrci.'iil vnto rhoufands
of the— thnloue me and keepemjr
comrraundetnent«. s 'O.j
I}. Thou ■'-halt not kill. 4.20.10
24. In which shall be the memory of
my name, 1 will ccmc to ihce and
blciTc cbee. 4.1.5
The Tabic.
%i.x J, But he that hath not lyen in
vvaite,buc chat God hath ^iuenl^im
into his handes,&c. i.i<J.tf.ik 1.18.3
17. He that shall curie his father or
mother. ihail dye the death 2.8. jtf
yi.x. Ifanyman shall haucftollen an
Oxe,or aShecpc,andshall r;aue kil-
led him or fold him , he shall reftorc
fine Oxen for one Oxc, and fourc
Shfcpeforonc Shccpe. 4.20.16
i. If the thcefc be no; found, the ma-
iler of the hoiifc shall be brought to
the Iudgcs,and he shall iv vcire that
hcha'haot&c, 4.20.4
II. Anoth shalbc betvvcne the, th.it
he ha rh not ftrctchcdout his h.indc
to the thing of his neighbour. 2, 8. 2 5
»5 Thy tenthes and firllfiutes thou
shalt notbt flackctopay. 3-7.S
aj.i. Thou sliait not admit a lye, nei-
ther shah thou ioync thy hand, that
thou shouldcftbcare fjlfe vvitncjfe
for the wicked. 2.8.47
4. If thou shalt mecte the O.s'e or AlTe
ofthy encmygoingaltray, bring him
bickc vnto him. i.9.$6
5. If thou shalt fee the AfTc of him
t!iac hater h thee lye vnder his bur-
de.thou shalt not palVc by,butshait
lift it vp together with him. 2.8. 5 (J
12 That thy Oxc & thy f\(Ve may take
reit,and that the fonne ofthy hande-
waiden may be refreshed , and the
flraungt'r- a.JJ.ja
IJ. And ye shall not fwe^ircbyrbe
name of outward Ciods, neither shal
it be hcarde out ofyour n;ourh. s-^i
l^. T'lou slialt cary the fill ofthy
frutcs into the houfe of the Lord thy
God. 5.7.5
•O Bth(>Ide, I wilKendemy A.nsell,
vvhich niavoobcfore ihec , and may
kcpc thcc in the wav, inu' m.iv bring
thee into the place Tvhich I haue
prepared. i.i^.tf
•4. 1 8 And Mofcs entr.ng the middcft
of the cloude,arcendcd into the hill,
& was there 40.daies 6c 40. nightes.
I 8 5.& 4 12 10
• 5.17. Alfo thou «haltinakc amcrcj
fcate of fine golde, tTvo cubices and
ahalfe longe, and one cubiteand
ahalfe broad. ilif.3
18. Thou .shalt alfo make two golden
Chenibins, beaten out on botn fides
of the Oracle, i.n. 3
20, They shall couer both fides of the
mercy feate , llretchinge out their
Yvingcs , and coucringe the Oracle,
5c their faces one to an other, to the
mercy feate wardcs , by rhe vvhich
the Arkc iscouered : in the vvhich
thou shalt put the tcftimony tiiat I
shsll giue thae. i.n.j
40. Lookc inland do according to th«
example vvhich was shewed thee
in themoiMJtainc. 2.7.1. & 4,14 ip
28.9. And thou shalt take tvvoOnix
ftoncs,and thou fhnit graue on them
th«: namei of the children of Ifraeil.
i.io.iS
10. Six names in one flone, and the o-
thcr fixe on rhe other ftonc , accor-
ding to the birrhofthtm. 3 20.18
12. And .».aron shall cary the names of '
them before the Lord , vppon either
shoulder, for a rcmcbraunce. 3.20.1 8
31. And the lioncs shall beaccordmge
tothcnamcsof the children of If-
raeU, i 2.accordinge to their names,
grauenas figncts , euery onea.cor- i
ding to his name J and they sh.dl be 1
for the I a.tribc.s. 3.20.18
2^.9. And thou shalt gird them with
girdles, both Aaron and bis Tonnes,
and thou shalt put on them bonets,
and they shall he pritlUs to mt by a
perpetual! reiigi('n,&:c. 4>2.9
36 And thou shalt offer a Calfeeuery
day Forreconcihaticju, & thru shalt
clen{cthea'tat,&t.» (7.4.& 4.18.1 j
30. JO And *.aroMshal make reconci-
liation vppon the home? thereof
once ayeare, with rhebloudrhatis
offered for finne, 2.1 5. tf
30. Tboush.-jltannoint Aaron and his
fonnes,and thou shale fanflifie them,
that they may minilter vnto me in
the Pneltes office. ^-^i* 3«
31.3. And I haue filled BefelceJl wnh
thefpirit of God, with vvifedeme,
voder-
inc
irnderftandinge, and knowledge in
echvvorke. i.i.i6
t}. bcciKatycukepcmy S;^baot!i,bc
caufc it i& a ^gnc bccwcnc me 5t yoii
)nyoor gc!icration.s. i.8.2 5>
31 I. Aiik, make vs gods ch^ a ay^^o
before vsjfur wr.y, ^ vc knovvc not
wljac hat^> happened to this n<aim(t
Mofcs , that orouglu vs out of the
landofFgypt. I.M 8
4. And they Jayd^thefe be t^y god9,0
■ Uracil y which brought thct fourth
of the land of Egypt. iii.^
%y. Letts cuery man pat bisfworc by
his iide , andgotoajd&chomg ac
to g.itcchrovvecheholte , and flay
euery man hii brother, and trend,&
neijjhbour. 4.10.10
ji. Either pjrdon them this fault , or
cHcif thou doit not , wipe me out
of the booke which thou hall wviic-
ten. 3 10. J 5
f j.i5». I will bauc mercy onvdiujl
will , and I will be fauorabk- vnto
▼vhomit shallpleafemc.2.5 ij dc I
11. u & J It 6,8 & J 14.15
»o. Thottcai>ft not fectny f^ct,fornaa
shall not f<c me and liu« i.ii.^
)4.fi. TIt€ Lord paffing before him, he
fayd.thtJ Lorde, the Lordc, ftronge,
merciful!, and gracious, pdcicnt ar.d
of much mercy. i.io.j
7'. VVh'cn docftp.iv fhc injqmcieof
the fathers to the childre, and vpon
ihechildres children, vnto the third
and fourtlvgcnc ration. 1.8 9
%%. Therefore Moles was therewith
tbc Lord 40. daie« & 40. nightes,he
. eate neither bread, nor d.ronke vva
tcr. i.S. ^.& 4 II 20
»5. Arni vvhen Mofes cnm<? dcvwne
from the mount Sinai , thetwo Ta-
bles of teftimony vverc in his hind?
( and he wi/l not that the skinne of
his face did shine bright after that
God had talked with him.) 1.8.5
15. 1. Youshal.workc fix daies,rhc fe
uqnth day shall be vnto you the ho-
ly Sabaoth of the Lordes reft. ».8
5 o. Behotde* cbf Lord hath called bj
nameBefeleel the fonncof Vri, the
fonneof Hur of the Tribe of ludah,
2 2 16
40.} 4. And a doudedid couer the Ta-
bernacle , tl.c ".-aiefty of the Lorde
glittering uidsliiuing. 1.8, J
LEVI TIC VS.
I*. « )i jHof'eucr of you shall offer
VV a lacrifice vnto the Lord,
yesh.ill offcritofcattcljasof Becfcs
and of sheepe. 4.1420
4. And he shall put his h.mdvpon the
heade of the (acrifce. ami it shall bc
acceptable and profitable for his at-
tonemcnt. 4. 3 i tf
5. And he shall offer vp thecalfe be*
forcthclord. 4.18.11
4,2. A foiilc \'vhc it shall finne
through ignoraunce in any of the
commaundementcs of the Lord,&,'c»
4.ei4
S.ij. And the prieft shall make an at-
tonement for him a touchingchis
finne , that he hath Hnnedin one of
thefe pointts, & it shall be forgiuca
him, &c. 1 *7«4
8.5. And all the multitude being ga-
thered t gather before the dore of
the Tabernacle,he washed Aaron &
his lonnes. 4-3'» J,
11.44. Be you holy bccaufe I am holy.
4.19.25
1 6.1 Spe;3kc vnto Aaron thy brother,
that he cnrer not cche time into the
fanduarv that is bftwenc the vale
before tile propitiatory , &C.2.15
6
21. And Aaron putting both his hads
vppon the liuc Goatc confellcd all
the iniquities of the children of If-
raeIl,5(C. ^.4.10
18. 5. The which thinges if a man do,
he jballliue in them. 2.8.4. & 117.5
& J.14.IJ & 3. 17. J
6. None shall come ncere any of tha
next of his blood that he should re-
ueale their sli.-imcfuInefTc. 4 19.1 j
»j>.2. Be yon holy, bccaufe I the Lord
your God am hoiy. 2.8.14. & j.d.a
&4- >^ 15
i^ Thou (halt not forfwcaro in my
s%ss
The Tabic.
name, neitlicrsKalt thou defile the
name of thy God I am the Lord, &c,
t6. Thoushalt notbe afalfe accufcr
nor avvhiTpcrcr amongclt the peo-
ple. 2*8.47
1 8 Thou shalt not fcckc aucngcment,
neither shalt thou be inindfull of the
vvronge of thy Citixens to thee. 2.8
5<J.&4 20.i<»
|i. You shall drawc away your pro-
mifes from them that vvorke with
fpirits, neither inquire you any thing
offothfaicrs thatyou should be pol-
luted by rhem. 4«'«5
io.6 The foulc which follovveth
after coniurers and foothfaycrs,
and goeth a vvhooringe after them,
I will put my face againftliim, &c.i
8.5
7. SanSiffc your felues, and be you ho-
ly,bccaufc 1 your Lord* God am ho-
ly. 415.25
5». He which curfeth his father or
mother , shall dye by death, a. 8
atf.3.- Ifyou shall walke in my waies,
andshal keepemy comaundements,
and do them. 2.5.10
4. I will giuc youraine in his time, i
16.5.& 2.8.4
IS. Ivvillwalke amongeftyou, and I
vvill ht your God, & you shal be my
people. 2.10.8
ao. Your ftrength shall be confumed
in vaine , the eai-th shall not bringe
forthherfrutejneither the trees, &c.
3.20.44
I J. Yetifby rhcfeyou wilnotreceiue
my difcipline, but vvill walkc con-
trary vnto me. 1. 17.8
a 5. Aftervvardcs 1 shall haue bro-
ken the fUft^ of your bread , infiich
forte , that tenne women may bake
bread in one ouen, and they shall
deliuerthembyvvayght,&c. 3.20
44
3 J. But you 1 will difparce amongclt
thcnations, and I vvill drawe out a
fvvord after you, and your land shall
- b«deferc,&c« a.ii.i
16. And fuch of you as shall rematnfk
I vvill caufe fcare in your heartes. 1
i8.a.& 2.4. <
NVMBERS.
6.$, a1 the while of his reparation,
•** the rafor shall not padc o-
uer by his head. 4.1 ^.2 <
18. inen the Nazaritc shall be sha-
uen before the dore of the Taber-
nacle of promife, by the lockesof
his confecration and he shal take his
heareandputit vpponthefire.4. <5)
26
9.18. All the daies that the cloude did
ftandcvppon the Tabernacle, they
did ercfl their tcntes there accor-
dinge to the commaundcment of the
Lordc. 4*1 S-J^
11.9'. And when the dew dfd fall by
n'ght vpo the campe,the Manna did
fall together with it. i.S.y
iS. Be you fan^lified , to morrow you
shall eate flesh. 320.51
jx. Awinde going out from the Lord,
brought quailesfrom beyonde the
(ca. 1.16.7
J J. Asyet the fleshwasbetwene their
teeth , neither as yet was chawed,
and bcholde the wrath of the Lor4
was ftirred amogeft his people, &c.
^ao.5^
12.1. Mary & Aaron fpokeagainft Mo -
fes for his vviue^fake , which vvaj
anRthiopian. 1-^4
r4.43. The Amalek:te$6c Chananices
are bcfor* you , by whofe fvvordc
you shal fall,for becaureyou\'vould
not Hay your felues vpon the Lorde,
nei ther v vil the Lorde be with you,
a.j.ii
15.^2 It came to parte whc the chil-
dren of Ifraell were in the dcfert,
and haddefounde amangatheriage
Aickes on theSabaoth. 2.8.2^
itf.14. Commaund^ill thepeople.that
they be feparated from the Taber-
nacles of Chore, Dathan, and Abf.
ron. I 8.5
ao 1 o The multitude being gathered
before the rocke,hc faid vnto them,
harken you rebels andinfidcU,whe'r
chcF
The Tabic.
ihcr or not shall vvc brings you vva
tt;r out «it this rotkc? I48 j
16. And when you shal hauc llnpped
the father fromhjsgaimct , clorh H-
leazar his fonne with ic. 4>)->S
21. 8 Make a Brafen Sci pent , and put
him for a iigjic , vvhod^eutr beingc
ftrokcii andlooke vppouhim, shall
liue 4.i)i. 20
^. Mofctmadc therefore a Brafen Ser-
pent, and fcrtehim for a fopc, the
vvhich vvhc they that ^■veri A: oken
did bcholde, they were he^iled 2.11
4
aj.io. Let my foule dye the death of
the righteous, and iei my lal\ end be
hkr CO theirs. 2.10 > 4
Ip. God is not as man, that he should
lye, nor as the fonne of nian, th.it he
should be rhaunged 117.12
a8.»- Thefc be the facrifices th^ityou
jhouldeoflFer,tvvo Lambcs oFivvo
yeares oldc without fpot^djily for a
coi tinuaM facrihce. 4>io
D E VTERONOMI VM.
1,1 6 TjEare them, and iudgc you that
** is rightjvvhcthtr he be a Ci-
tixci* or (h-aungcr 4.20.4,6,9
jp. Your litle ones vvhonie you (::yd
should be caried captiues, an.1 your
(onnes vvhich thi« day knew not
good from cuill,they shall enter in. 4
16.19
a.je. The Lord thy God will hjrdcn
his fpirite, & will m.ike h»s h.irc ob-
Itinate . fo that he shall b«^ deluiered
into thy handes. i.iS 2.& i.4.}.& *
4-4
4.a« You shall not adde to the worde
which I fpeake vnto you , neither
take therefrom. 4-9.2
J. Neither is there a nation fo great,
which hath the gods fo athandc,as
our God is at hande at eucry of our
rcqucftes. 3.34. 1 5
f. Kept thy felfc therforc & thy foule
carefully, that thou forgette not the
' words that thy eies haue feene, and
' let them not depart out of thy hart
alltbedaiesofthylifcj&c. i.)i.$
ti. And youcaroe vnto the footcof
the hiJl,which did burnc to heauen,
there was iherin darkenes,ciouJes,
andmiltcs. i ti.j
1 ^ Keepe your foules therefore care-
fully :you fawnot anylikcnes in thac
day thac the Lord fpake vnto you. x
II. a
16. Leaft that beingedeceiued, you
shuulJemakevnto your felues fom<e
grauen nmilitude , or image ofmalc
or female. 2.8.17
17 The likenesofeuery beall thatbe
vpon the earth, orotflymge birdcs
vnder thehcauens. 2.8.17
3:.T4. 1 hat thy icruaunt and handmaid
may relt as well as thou. 2.8.3*
17. Thou shalt n't kill. 4.2010
6.5. Loue the lord thy God with all
thy hait,& with all thy ftrength 2.7
S.& a.8.5i.& 3.»r4
I J. Thou, shalt feare the LcrJc thy
God , and /erne him oncly, and thoii
shalt fweare by his name. 2.8.25
16. Tliou shalt Mot tempt the lorde
thy God, as thnu temptcfthimin the
place of tcmpration. 4-*}'3
15. He will hauc mercie vponvs, if
we doe keepe and doe ail his com-
maundtmcntes before our Lorde
God as he hath commaunded vs* }
17.7
J. 6, Becaufc thou art a holie people
vnto rhe Lord thy God.the Lord thy
God hath chofen thee, that thou
shouldelt be vnto him a peculiar
people of al the people vthich be on
thecirth. j 8.14
7. Nor hcca\i(e v<^\i did proccede in
numb-r the reliof the nations,is cho
Lord loined vnto you and hath cho-
Icnyou, when as youbetheleaft of
all natioris. ?'22.S
8. Butbecaufethc Lord loucdyf>u, 6c
did keepe h:s othe thac he Ivvore to
your fathers, &c. ?'»a«5
p. And thou shalt know »l)ecaufe f he
Lordhcis thcltronge God& faith-
full, keepinge couen^ntand mercie
with them that louc him, and vvnh
them thac keepe hu commaundc-
fficnr. 2* 1 7> $
S S S S il
The Table.
IS. If after you shall hcare thcic
iudgemences, you shall kepe and do
them, the Loide thy God will kecpe
thecouenant and mercy with thee,
which he (wore to thy fathers. 3.17
I
1 3 And he will louc thee , and blclTc
& multiply the frutc of thy wombe,
andthefrutc ofthylande, &C.3.17
I
S.2. And thou shale remember all
thy iourncy by the which the
Lorde thy God Icade ihce fortie
yearcsby the delert, that he might
afiii^ thee and proue thee. 3.30
4«
3, That he might shcvve thee , that
man liueth not onely by bread , i\xt
by euery word that goeth out of the
mouth of the Lorde. i 16.7.S1C 3.20
44
5.^. Knowe thou thereforc,thc Lorde
thy Goil gauc thee not this good
countrcy for to poiTeffe for thy righ -
teoufncfTe fake, when is thou art
a people of a moil hard necke. 3 . z 1
5
10.12. And now Ifrael,what doth the
Lord thy God require of chec , but
that thou shouldellfcare the Lorde
thyGod,&c. 28.51
14. LoCybeholdetheheauen, andthc
heauen of heauens,the earth,and all
that be in the be the Lord rhy God?,
2.11. II & 3. 21.5
15. And yet notvvithftandinge the
Lorde w^as ioyned vnto thy fathers,
andloucd thcm,Sc chofc their feedc
. after them, &c. 3 2».5
16. Circumcife therefore the vncir-
cumcifion of your harteSjand harden
not your necKe any more. 2. 5.8 & 3
3.6.& 4.16, 3. & 4.1^.21
10. Thoushalt fcare the Lorde thy
God and shalt ferue him onely, thou
shalt cleaue vnto him , and shale
fvveare byhis name. ?-^-2 5
11.26. Loe, I put before your fight
this day a bleffinge and a curfingc. 3
ia.13. Beware thou oiler noc thy
burnt ofFringes xn euery place that
thou shalt fee. 4. 1. j>
14. But in that place that thy Lorde
God hath chofen,in one of thy tribes
there chou shalt offer thy offerings,
& thou shalt dowhatfocuer 1 com-
maund thee. 4.29
a8. Keepe and barken to all that I co-
maund thee , that itgocwell vvith
thee, and thy children after thee for
euer,&c. 2.8. 5
52. Thou shalt not addc nor diminish
any thmg. 4. 10. 17
13.3. The Lorde yonr God proued
you, thatit mjghtappeare, v\'he-
ther you loucd him or not vvith all
your hart, and with all your foulc.
3.20.4.6
14 2. Thou art a holy peovle to the
Lorde thy God , and he chofc thee,
that thou mightctt be to hima pecu-
liar people, out of all the nations of
the earth 2.^.14
i<S.io. And thou shalt celebrate the
holic day of wcckes vntotheLord "
thy God a willinge offeringe o-f
thyhandes, which thoushalt offer
according to the bleifing of the Lord
thy God. 2.18.8
i^. Thou shalt not rcfpcftperfons. nor
take bribes , becaufe bribes dot 1
blinde the eyes of the wife, and doc '
chaungc the vvordes of the iuff. 4
ao.^
17,8. If thoushalt perceiue hard and
doutfull iudgementbetwcne blood
and blood, and caufe and caufe,&c,
3-4 4
^. Thou shalt come vnto the Pricft of
theLeuites, and to thcludge that
shall be at that time, and thou shale
feckcofthem,&c. J.4.4.& 4.8.*
1 1 . And they shall teache thee accor-
ding to that law, and thou shalt fo»
low their iudgement. 4.8, >
12. Vv'hofoeuer shall be proude, nc>s
willinge to obey the gouerrrmenc oF
the Prieft , which that time ferueth
before the Lorde the God , by the
fentence of the ludge that man shall
die , and tho^ strait take away epiU
horn
The Tabic.
fromlfraelf. 4.8 z
t6. And whe he shall be ordained, he
shall not cncreafc his horfc, neither
shall he CArychc people backeinto
Egypt. 4^09
18.11. Neither hevvhich fceketh the
truethatthcdead. IS.(S
Xj. Thou shaltbe perfc&and with*
out fpotte yvith thy Lorde God. 2.8
15. The Lorde thy God will raife vp a
Prophet vnto thee of thy nation,and
of thy brethren like vnto me , him
thou shaltheare. 4i<$
i^.ip They s hall giue vnto him, as he
hadde thought to hauc done vnto
his brother. 4.70.16
ti.i 8. If a manne shall beget a contu-
melious & ftubborne fonne , which
vvd not be ruled by his father or mo •
ther, and shall contemnc to obey to
berhaltened.&c. z.S.jtf
2 ; . He is curled of God that hangeth
on a tree. a.7.15 & a.i6.^
ij 5. And he will turnc his curfe in-
to a blelfinge , becaufe he did ioue
thee. S-it'S
14,1 5. But byandby thou shaltreftore
vnto himhis pledge before thefunne
fee , that lleepinge in his garment he
may bleffe thee, and that thou mayft
haue righteoufnes before the Lorde
thy God. J-JT.7
»tf.i8. Beholdc, the Lord hath chofen
thee this day, that thou shouldefi be
vnto himapeculiar people, as he told
thee, and that thou migbtelt keepe
ailhispreceptes. 1.8.14
J7.26. Curfed be he that doth not a-
bide bythewordcsof thislavv,and
that doth not throughly do them in
vvorke. 2.7.5.& 2.7.15.& 2.i^.<S
& j.ii.i^.& j.iz.i.&J 14.13.& J.«7
:: , I.& 1.179
• 8,1. If thoushalt heare the voice of
the Lord thy God, that thou do and
keepe all his commaundements that
I commaund thee thisday,thc Lord
thy God will ma^e thee excellentcr
th*n allnatioas that dwell on the
C9tth, 1*17. {.&»'$. 10
2 All thefe bleflingcs shall come vpon
thee, and shall ouertake thee iftiiou
shalt harken to thofe precepts. 2. 8. 4
J2. The Lord shall open his belt tre-
fure the hcauen,& he shall giuc raine
vnto thy land, &c. 1.16.5
2 p. And alvvayes thou shalt fuffer re-
proche,and thou shalt be opprcfiTed
by violence, neither haft thou any to
dcliucrthee. 4.20.25
jtf. The Lorde shall lead thee and the
kinge which thou doeft ordaineo-
uer thee, into a nation which thou
doeft not knovv,neither thy fathers,
&c. 2.11.1
tfj. For the Lord shall glue vnto thee
a fearefull heart, and failed eyes, and
afoule confumed with grecfe. 2.4. <f
2^-2. You hauc fcene al that the Lord
did before vouinthclandof Egipr,
&c. 2.2.20
4. And the Lord gaue not vnto you an
vnderftanding hart, and feeing eies ,
and eares which might hcare, vntill
this prefent day. 2.2.20
18. Leaftthcre beamongeft you ama,
or vvoma, or family, or tribe,vvhor(5
hart this day is contrary l^ro the Lord
our God, that it shoulde go & feme,
&c. 5.17.5
15. And when he h.nh heard the
vvordes of this othe , he blelTe him-
felfe in his heart, fayinge .* Peace
shall be vnto me , and I will walke
in thewickedneft'eofmy hart •* and
fo he take with dronkennefTe thirft.
3.17. J
jO. And the Lorde shall not forgiue
him, but the melt ofallshal his lage
fume and his zeale againft that man,
and all tiie curfes shall light vppon
him that are written in this booke,
&c. 5.3.7
19. The fecrete thmges bclonge vnto
our Lord God,but thofe that be qia-
nifcft , vnto TS and our children for
eucr, that we may do eucry thing of
thislavv. 1. 17.2. & 3,21.3
jO,2. And thou shalt returnc vnto
him, and thou shalt be obedient vn»
his gouernmcnt,as Lhaue commau"
SSSS iij
The Tabic.
ded theethis day , with thy chil-
dren^Scc. j ^-6
3 The Lord chy God shall bringe tbcc
backe fromrhy capciuicie, and he
shall haue mercie of thee, and he
shall gather thee together ag^jnc
from amongeft all the nations a-
mongeft vvhomehehaddefcattered
thcc. 41' 2 4
6. The Lord thy God will circumcife
thy hartjand t'lc heart of thy /eede,
that thou njaieft loucthe Lorde thy
<jod,&c. a.5.8.& 1.5.12.& j-j.^
& 4 »6.j
10. Ifthou shjlt for all this heare the
voice of the Lord thy G..d,andsha!t
kcepc his preceptes and ceremonits
whichbe commauadcd in this law,
&c. 1.7.5
11. The commaundcment that I doc
commaunde thee this day, is not a-
l»oiiethcc,neither a far oh ».s-ia
13. Neithsvisir fet beyond thefcajthat
thou shouldelt fay : who of vs shall
go oucr the fcj and fctthe it vs,that
vvcmay heare it? 2.5.' 1
14. But the vvorde is very neere vnto
thee, in thy mouth and hart , that
thou maicft doit. J.^ ii.Sc ?.24 J
15. Confidcr that this daylhaueput
before thy fight life & good,& con-
trariwirejdeat'hand cuil. 3 «7*
1^. Idocalheauen and earth this day
covvitnclVe, that I hauc put before
you, life and good, blcflin-^eand
cur/Inge : choo(e therefore life , that
thou may fl Hue and thy feede. 1.5. 4
|j.j;. They haue corrupted themfel-
ues tovvardchimbv tneir vice, not
being his children, but a Cro ward &
crooKcd generation. 1 8.5
S. When the almighrie deuided the
nations , when he fepar.itcd the
fbnncsof Adam , he appointed the
boundes of the people, &c. ii'.ii
& 3 »' 5
\^. The well beloucd is waxen fatte:
he hath kicked, beinge fvvolei»vp
vwith fatte , hath for faken God his
maker, &c* 5.S.5
17. They hauc offred vptoDcullIs, &
not to God. 4.1 J. 1 7
II. They haue prouokcd mc with
that vvhich was not God. i.ijij
35 Vengeance is mine, and I will re-
ward,&c. 2.8. 56. & 4.20,1 1>
4^. Set your harts vponail the words
that 1 teltifie vnto you this day,thit
you may commaunde them vnto
your children, that they mayobferiie
and do all the vvordesof thclawc.
} J.?. All holy menncbeinhis hand.
2 10.^
2j?, BlcfTt'd art thou O Ifracll , who is
iikechec O people, which art faucd
in thcLor(i?&c. 2.10 8
34.5. And Mores the (cru-nunt of the
Lord died in the iandeof Mo3b,the
Lord coojmaunding. - - 4.6.1 1
I O S V A H.
i-y.QVV^rue not from it, neither to
•^ t!ie tight hand nor to the left,
thacthou mayf^ vnderftadall things
that thou doeft. 4.9.1^
8. The volume of this LavvcshaiJ not
dcpartt from thy mouth, but thou
sh.ilt meditate tnereon day & night,
&c. 4 y.ia
a. I VVhop;oinge foorth , cntred the
houfe of a vvom«n harIo,t,named Ra- .
habj&c. 3H-*<
5. I h.me knovven that the Lord hath
deluiered vnto you the laridc , for
why , the fsarc ofyou hath fallen v-
pon vs,and all the inhabitates of the
land hath fainted. 2.4.<S
II. And we hcaringc thefe thinges,
feared vvoi)derfully, and the hart of
Vs faynted , neither was there any
courage left in vs at the eniraunce
ofyou : For the Lordc your God, he
is God in heauen aboue , and in earth
beneath. 2.4.^
5.14. lam thechie^of the hoflof the
Lorde. i'i4'5
7.19. And lofuah faid to Acam, my
fonne « g€ne glory vnto the Lorde
God of *rraell,andc6ftfreandfhevv
vnto mc what thou haft done.J.8.24
xo.ij. And the Sunnc and Moone
ftoode
The Tabic.
ftoodeflill. I.I 6. 2
II. ao. It was the iudgcmcnt of chc
Lord, chat their barts fhouUi be hard-
ned, & that they f hould fight againft
Ifraeil* i.iS.i
»4.2. Your fathers dwelt beyond the
flud,ii'om the beginning,cucn Thare
the father of Abraham, and the father
of Nader, and thcyfcrued ftraunge
gods. I. II. 8. & 3.24.1
J. I tooke your father Abraham from
the borders of Mefopotamia , and I
brought him into the land of Cha-
naan,&c. 3*24.2
I V D G E S.
J.I, A Nd the Lorde went vp from
Cilgall to a place of , &c.
1. 14.6
18. And when the Lorde had raifed
them vp ludges , in thofc daycs , he
vvasmoued with comp.)flion , and
did heare the groncs of their affli-
aions,&c. J. 3.J5.& 3.10.15
1^. Yet after theludgewas dead, they
vverc turned, and they did roucn
worfe then their fathers did , fol-
lowing ftraunge gods. ?.3«*5
J.J. And they cried vnto the Lorde,
which raifed vnto then afauior,and
hedeliueredthe.3.20.1 5. & 4. 20. JO
xa. And the children of Ifraellbrgan
againe to do euill in the Hghc of the
.• Lorde. j.ao-ij
,15, And afterwardes they cried vnto
' the Lorde, which raifed them vpa
fauior,&c. j.20.15
^♦11. The Angell of the Lorde came
andfattevnder theOke. i »4.(J
: 14, And the Lorde looked vponhim,
and laid: goin, thisthyftrengthand
thou fhalt deliucr Ifraell from the
handof the Median.i.i J.10.&.1.14.5
34. But the fpirit of the Lorde clo-
thed Gedion,vvho founding a trom-
pet , called together the houfe of
Abiczer that ic fhould folio we him.
« 2.2.17
' J7« ^ *vill put this fleece of vvoll in
•the thre(rhingplacc:if devve fhall
be in the oncly fleecCianddrinefle on
alUhegrouadj&c 4.14.18
8.27. And Gedion made thereof aa
fcphod,and put it in his Citie Ephra, ^
and all Ifracl wee a vvhooring there
after it , which was the dcltruftion
ofGsdion and his houfe. 410.2$
5.20. But if frowardly, let fire come
forth from Abimelech,and confume
theinhabitautcsof bechem, andthc
towneof Mello,&c. 5.20 15
11.30. lephthe vowed avowevnto
the Lord, raying:if thou fhalt deliuer
the fonnes of Ammo into my handes ,
&c. 4.M-?
I j.io . BeholdCjthe man appeared vnto
me which I did fee before. 114.^
16, To whom the Angell aunfvvered,
if thou compcU me , I will not eate
of thy bread , but if thou wilt make
burnt offering, offer that vnto the
Lorde. 1.13.JO
18. Why doeft thou inquire after my
namejtnatismaruellous? 1.13.10
ij>. Therefore Manoah tookc a kidde
of the goatcs and meate offerings,
and put it vppon the ground,offe-
ring it vnto the Lord. 4.10.25
12. VVc f hall die the death, becaufe
vvchauefeenethe Lorde I. 13.10 &
1.14.5
13. If the lorde would killA's , he
would not haue receiued a burnt of-
fering and meate offeringes at our
handes. i.ii.io
i6.ii, O Lorde my God be mindfuU
of me, and geue me novve mine olde
ftrength , that I may reuenge me of
my enemies. 3.20.15
ai.i5. In thofe dayes there was r>o
king in Ifraell, but cuery one did that
that Teemed right in his owneeyes.
4.20.9
R V T H.
3.13. tF he will not haue thee,I will
■*■ laketheevvjthout any doubt:
The Lorde liueth. a. 8. 27'
1 . S A M V E L.
I.I 3. 13 Vt Anna fpake in her hart,arid
only her lippc«: did raoue, and
her voice was not at all heard, whcr-
fore Heli thought f he was dronkert.
3 JO.Jt
SSSS iiij
The Tabic.
t.6. ThcLorJedotfiTciHandqaickrn,
Jic doth lead vnto hell and briugcth
backeagainc. 3. 10.51
5 He will kepethcfeetcofhis Sain-
£tcs : and rhc wicked fballkcepe
fikixceindarkn^frc. 2.18.18
lO. And be will goue rale vnto his
king: and he will exalt the home of
his annointcd. 2-6.Z
15. And they heard not the voice of
their father, becaufe the Lord wonld
kill tbem, I.I* ?.& 3.Z4.«4
34. A-nd this fhall be .1 figne vntothce,
that fhall come vpo thy two Tonnes
Ophne and Phinees : they fhall die
both on one day. i.iSi
6.^. And youfhjil fee, and if fo it go
vppe by the way of his coaftes a
gainft liethfamesjhe did vs this great
cuill,&c. 1.16.5)
y.j. If you do turncvuto the Lord c,
with all your hartes , piit away the
ftraunge Gods from amongcft you,
Baalem and Afcaroth , and prepare
your hartes vnto the Lord, 6: c. 3.3.5
€, And in that day they fjltcd, & they
faid there: we hauc finned againit
the Lordc. 4.1a. 17
17. He buiit there an altar to the Lord.
4.10. 25
f .7, They haue not cajt of thee , but
me^thac I fhould not rule ouer the.
4,20.6
ix.Thii.fhallbcthe'rightofyourking,
which fhall rale you ,he fhall take
your fonnes & put them in his dia
riots, &c. 4 20 2<f
Jo. 5. And the fpint of the Lordc f h.>ll
come vpon thtc,3nd thou { haIt,pro-
phecic witU thero, and thou Ihait
be chaungcd into an other man. i,-
t «7-& 2.3-4
5>. Thereforc,vvhen he had turned itis
backe tu go from Samuel! , God gaue
him an other hart, & all thefeiignes
, chaunced in that day, j. 2. 1 »
t6. Saule alfo went home to Gibeah,
and with him part of the armie,
whofehart God had touched. 2, 2. 17
€1.6. Then the fpirit of the Lortlecame
vpou Saule, when he heard thefe
worde$,&e, , 94.S
1 5. And all the people arofc in GHgal;
and made Saule their kung before th^
Lordcjikc i.S,6
12 2 2 And the Lorde will not forfake
his peopl., for his great names fake,
bec.^{« the Lordc Ivvorc he would
niiik'j you his people, ^.2-'.$
14,44. And Sanlc f<id,God do fo, and
niorealto Mn:ome, thou f halt dy the
death lonathan. a. 8. 24
15.11. It reptttchme,thatl hauemadc
Saul king V I'^ecaute he hath forfaken
nis, and hath nut d.mc as I com-
maun^ied linn:and S.-?»nuelI was fad,
and critdvnco the Lordc all night,
1. 17. 1 2 &. J.20. 5
22. Whether will the Lorde haue
burnt facnficc and -ofTcringSiai^d not
rathtr that the voice of the Lorde
fbould be obeyed, &c. 4.10.17.&4
23 For rebellion is as the fJnne of
witchcrafts, and not totruft in the
Lordc as the fiiine of idolatry , for
that thou haft caft away thcvvorde
of thcLorde,&c. 3f4.3 3.& 4.»o 17
if. For the tDumphcr in Ifracil will
not fpare , neither will he be chaun-
gcd by rcpentauncc , neither is he
man thae he fhould repent. 1.17.1a
30. But he laid.. 1 haue iinned : but
honor me , I pray thee , before the
fcsiorsof mypeople,&c. 3. J -4
J 5 . But Samuel did bcwaile Saule:and
it repented the Lorde that he had
made Saule kiug ouer Ifraell. 3 2Q.1 5
161. And the Lorde faid vnto Sa-
tnueUjhovve long wilt thou bc^'vailc
Sau!e? feing I hauc curfed him, as
that he fhall not rcignc,&c, 3. bo.i 5
ij. >anjuell ttikc therefore his home
of oile , and annointcd him in the |
middcft of his brethren* 1.8.7.& a
2.17
14. And an euill fpiritc did vexehinj
from the Lr.rde. I.i4.i7.& i 4.5
18.10. And after another daye ,tbe
cuill fpiri^pfGod entred Saule. j.14
iSf'9» -Ana the ciull (pirit of t^ Lorde
1 he Tabic.
; vv-asvpon Saulc, and he fatte in his
hout'e , and hclde a laucline io his
. hand,&'-, 2.4.5
% 3 .3j$. And Saulc and his men went: on
the one fide of che hill, and Dauid 8C
his men on the other fide. i.i6,^
%J. And a rocfTcngcr came vnto Saulc,
^ and laid : make haft & come, bccaufc
: the Phihflines haucinuaded che cou.
trey.. i.i5.p
04.7- TheLordkecpcraCjthatldonoc
this thing vnto my Lord the annoin •
ted ofthc Lorde, that I fhould lay
wy hjnd vj>on him, which is the an-
tiointed ofthc Lorde. 4.20.28
XI. Bwt mine eye hathfparcd thee : for
I faid, I rv'ill not ftretch out my had
aigainft my lorde ,becaufc he is the
annointed ofthc Lorde. 4.2038
t6.$, Aad Dauid faid vnto Abi(ai,kill
iiimnot: for who fhall ftretch forth
Ills hand againft the annoinced of the
Lorde, and be blamelerte? 420.28
1*. All of them did llcepc , becaufe
the drowfinclTe of the Lord fell vpon
thctn. 1.1 8.2
^j. The Lorde fhall reward* ciiery
inati according to his righteoufnefTc
and faiihfiilncflc, for the Lorde hath
dcliuered thee into myhaudes, 5cc.
j.i7.?4
Ji.i 3. And they tooke their bones,
and buried them in a groue at labes,
and theyfaftedy.dayes. 4. 12.17
2. S A M V E L.
5.8. 'THerfore it is faid inaprouerbe,
the blinde and lame fhall not
L entcrinto the temple. 4.11J.JI
7.14. Ihe which if be fhall do any
thing wickedly , I WiM corrcd him
with the rodde of men, and in the
plagues of the fonnes of men. j.4 32
27; Bccaufc thou O Lorde God of the
holies of Ifrael, haft reueaied vnto
thy fcruaunt , faying ; I wi)l builde a
.horufcto tht'«;,&c. 3.20,13
fj^i. Nowe therefore ,0 Lorde God,
thou art Q>d , and thy vvordcs. arc
true , thou haft fpokcnvnto thy fcr-
uaunt chefe good things. 3.20.14
lO.i %, J^e thou a ftoute man , and let
vs tight for bur people , 4nd for the
citie of our God, and the Lorde will
do that feemeth good in his o\'vne
eyes. i.i7'9
11.4. Dauid hauing fent meiTcngers,
brought hir , who when fhc came
vnto uim,he flept with hir. 4. » . 24
15- He v"vrote in a letter: put Vriain
the front of the battel whc-rc tlw
greatcft fcermifhc is, and forfake
him , that being ftroken he may -dy.
Ibidem.
12.12. Thou dideft it priuilie, bati
will do this thing in the ftght of all
Xfracl. 1.1 ii. I
I}. And Dauid faid vnto Nathan,!
hauc finned againft the Lorde. And
Nathan faid vnto Dauid : the Lo; de
hath put away thy finne , thou f halt
nocdy. 3.5.4.& 3.4 10. & 3.4.31. &
.4,1.24
14. Notwithftading for becaufe thou
madeft thcenemies of the name of
Godblafphcme for this tfiing,the
fonne that is borne vnto thee fhail
dy. 3.4,3}
16,10. The Lorde hath commaunded
him that he fhould cuffe Dauid, and
who is it that dare fay , why halt
thoudonefo.^ 1.17.8.& 1.18.1.& f
18.4
22. Therefore they fpred Abfolon a
tent vpoa the t oppe of the houfe,anii
he went in vnto the concubins of
his father, before all Ifraell. i.i 8.1
& I.J 8 4.
17.7. And Chufay faid vnto Abfolou:
it is not good counfcU that Achito<
phelgauc this time. i«i7»7
14. Tneprofitable counfell of Achito-
phel is fcattered abrode by the becke
of the Lorde, that the Lorde might
bring vpon Abfolon eucll. 1.17.7. &
*.4-<5
22.20. And he brought me forth into
largencs, he dcliuered me becaufe it
pleafedhim. 3-^7'S
ai. The Lordehathgeucn vnto meac-
cordingvnto myrighteoufneffe, and
according vnto che cieannelTeof my
haadp*. JJ7.J
The Tabic.
^,1, And the wroth of the Lorde
wasagainekindeled againft Ilraell,
and he moued Dauid againit them in
that lie faid vncoloab , go number
Ifraeli and luda. 1. 14.18
10. But the hartc of Dauid ftroke him
after he hadde numbred the people:
and Dauid faid, &c. 3'3«4
so. And going forth, he vvorfhipped
the king , grouchng with his face
toward the earth. i.X3.|
I. K I N G E S.
t.x^. "DEthfabee bowed hir felfc and
vvorfhipped the king, i
SI. It f hall eomme to pafTe, when my
Lorde the king fhall fleep with his
Fathers, my fonne and I fhalbe coun-
ted offenders. }'ii«3
».5. Thou knoweft what loab the
fonne of Seruix hath done vnto me,
and what he hath done to the two
capit^nes of the huft of Ifraell. 4
20.10
4. Thou fhalt do therefore according
to thy wifedome,and thoufhalc not
bring his gray heares peaceabley
vnto the graue. 4x0,10
>. Thou halt alfo with thee Semey the
fonne of Gera the fonne of Gemini, of
Bahurira, which curfed me with an
eueUcurfe,&c. 4.20.10
f.»3. Which kepcft couenant and
mercies with thy iicruantes , which
vvalke before thee with all their
hart?. J *7*J
4^ If they finneagainfl thee (for there
is not a man that finiieth notyi and
being angry thou fhall deliucr them
vnto their enemies, &c. 2.7.5 8c J
i49&4i,JS
47. And if they fhall rcpet them v vith
all their h^rts in the place oF their
captiuitie,&c. 4-»-25
58. That he may bowe our harts vnto
him , that we may walke in all his
vvayes ,and that we may kepe his
commaundements and ceremonies,
&c. ».?.9
11.12. Notwithftanding, inthydavcs
I will not do it for Dauid chy fathers
fake , But I will rent it out of the
hand of thy fonne. 2.6.»
2;. God (lirredhim vpan aduerfarie,
&c. 1.18.1
31. I will rent the kingdom out of
Saiomos handes, & I will giue vnto
the ten tribes. 1.18.1
34. Nether will take the whole king
dome out of his hand , but I will
ordaine him a captain all the dayes
of his life for L>auids fake,&c.
2.tf.S
$$. And Iwillforthis,affiiathefced
of Dauid,butnot foreuer. 2.^.1
12.10. And the yonge men faid vnto
him which were brought vp toge-
ther with him,fpcake thus vnto this
peopIe,&c. 1.17.7
15. And thekinge barkened not vnto
• the people , bccaufe the Lorde was
aducrfanevntohim,&c. i.y.y.&t
18.4 & 2.4.^
ao. Neither did any follow the houfe
of Dauid, but the tribe of luda only,
8cc. 1.18.4
a8. Counfell being taken , he made
two golden ca!ues,and faid vnto
them :go not further vp to lerufa-
lem, behold thy Gods Ifraell which
brought thee, &c. 4.2.8
JO. And this thing turned to linnc,for
the people vvent toworfhip euen
today. 4.20. J 2
}i. And he made a houfe in highe pla-
ces , and priei^s of the rafcils of the
people which were not of the !> ones
ofLeui. < 4.2.8
15.4. EntforDauids fake the Lorde
his God gaue him a light in lerufa-
lem, that he f hould raife vp his fonn«
after him, and that he f hould elU«
blilhe Icrulalem. 1.6. %
18.10. The Lord thy God liueth, there
is no nation or kingdome into the
which my Lorde hath not fent. &c,
18.27
41. And Elias (aid to Acab : cumvp
and eateand drinke,becaufe there is
afoundeofmuchraine* a.»o.j
42. But tlias came vp vnto the top of
Carm^I ,and he put his face groue-
ling
The Tabic.
Bng on the eartKbctvvcne his knees.
4^. And he faidvntohis boy, go vp
snd lokc tovvardcs the fea : who
when he went and favvcand had
beholden , he laid,ihere is nothing;
and he faid vnto him againe , rcturne
feuen times, a.zo. j
1^.8. And he walked in the ftrength
of that meac40.dayes & 40.nights,
cuen vntill the hill of God Horcb.
4 12. to
iS. I haucleft vntomy felfcin Ifraeil
- 7000. men , vvhofc knees haue not
bowed before Bale. 4.1.2
»i.ia« They proclaimed a faft, and fee
Naboch amongeft the chiefe of the
• people. 4.11.17
a8. And the word of the Lorde came
• vnto Elias the Thefbyte , laying.
»5, Halt thou not fene Achab humbfcd
before me? becaufehc was humbled
before of mc , I will not bring the
euell in his dayes, &c. 3 ;. i%.&. 3
20.15
tr 6, The king of Ifr^cll gathered
therefore abouc 400. Prophctj. 4. y.5
ai. A fpirit went forth and rtcde be-
. fore the Lorde, and faid , [ will de-
cciuc. 1.14.17 & 1.17.7 & i«8. 1
21. And he r^id , I will go out and I
. will be a lying fpirit in the mouth of
" all lis Prophets. ^9'^
tf. Thus faith the king, fend this man
into pri(on,andmantainc him with
- the bread of tribulation and with
tlie water of greife, vntill I retourne
in peace, 4P^
1. K I N G E S.
5. 17. A NdNaamanfajd,as thouwilc:
but Ipray thee graunt rnto
me thy feruaunc, that 1 take the bur-
dee of two Aflcs of earth: forhcare-
after thy feruaunt will offer no
burnt offering nor facrificeto Itrage
Go ds,but vnto the Lorde, * 3.2,31
18. This is the onely thing that thou
fhalt pray vnto the Lorde for thy
feruaunt , when n>y Lorde fhallgo
iototheTemple,&e. 3«>'32
ij>. And he faid vnto him, depart m
peace, he vventtherfore from thece
afurlongeofground. ji.jx.
6.15. Out alas maiAer,vvhatf hall we
do? 1.1411
I 6. There be mo with vs then wi^h
them. i.i4.i»
17. Lorde open the eyes of this boy,
that he may fee. And the Lorde ope-
ned the eyes of the ladde,& hefawe,
and beholdc , a mountaine full of
horfes and chariots of fire round a-
boutElixci. 1.14.7,8,11
31. The Lorde do fo , and fo vnto nie,
if the head of Elixei the Tonne of Sa..
phat f hall Itand vppon him this d ay.
2-8.24
10.7. And when letters came vnto
them, they toke tbe Tonnes of the
kine,and flue70.men,&c. 1.18,4
lO- Knovve novveth.it there f hall fall
vnto the earth nothiig of the word
of the Lorde the which, the Lorde
hath rpoken,&c. 1.1 1.4
1(5. 10. And vvhen he h,id fene the
altarthat was atDamafcus,he fent
toVria thePriclt thepaternetherof,
and the likeneHe , according to the
worke thereof. 4,10.23
17.24. Ti.ekingofAfiyria brought me
fr6B.ibilon&fio Cuth^,&c.4, 10.23
25. And vvhcn they beganne to dwell
there, they feared not the Lord, and
the Lorde fent Lions vnto then that
they might kill them. 4.10.13
32. Thu.s tliey feared the Lorde, and
appointed out priclls out of them,
felucs for the hy places, &C.3 2.1 3.fic
4.io.23.ac4.i5.a»
33. And when they feared the Lorde,
they did feruc alfo their gods, accor-
ding to the maner ofthe people from
whence they were brought , &c. 3.
34. Eucnvnto this prefcnt day they
follovvetheauncientcuftome,thcjr
fcarenoc the Lorde , neither kecpe
his ceremonies, &c. 3.2.13.
ij>.4. And make prayer for the reft
that be found. j .20.14.
35. It came to paffc in that night, the
The
Angell of the Lord came and ftroke
in the campc of the Affyrians one
hundrech fov verfcore and fiue cliou -
fand. 1.14.^.
»o.i. Set thy houfc in an order, for
thou shalt die & not liuc, 1.17,1 j.
I. Then Ezechias turned bis face to
the vvall,and he prayed to the Lord.
J. I befcech thee Lord remeber I pray
thee, ho we I haue walked before
thee in truth and in a perfede hart,
and haue done the thing that thou
. Itkeflof. J.14.19.& J.20.I0.
5. Beholdjlhaue healed thee,the third
day thou shalt goevp to the temple
of the Lord c. 1.17.1a
^, Will thou that the shadovve goc
forvvardes 10. degrees, orthatitgo
backward fo many 4.1 4.18
II. And Ifaias called vppon the Lord,
and he brought backe the shadows
by the lines by the vvhicheic went
dovvne into the clocke of Achab.
11.4. And he built altars in the houfc
ofthcLord,oftIie which thcLordc
fpake, I will put my name in lerufa-
lem, 4,10. 2 J.
%6. MoreoucrManaflcs shcdde inno-
cent bloode ouer much, till he filled
vp lerufalem vnto the mouth , &c.
3.24.11.
a2.2. And he did the thing that pica-
fed the Lorde , and he walked in all
the vvayes of his father Dauid, and
declined not neither on the right
hand, nor lefc. 4.10. 2 j
t, AndHecliasthchy PrieU faidvnto
. Saphan the fcribe , 1 haue found thp
booke of the Law in the houfc of the
Lorde, and Heclias gaue it to Saphan
thefcribc^and hercad init. %,%.%
I. CHRONICLES.
s8.S. Pi^^ t^ie footeftoojc of the Lord
our God. 4i'5
2. CHRONICLES.
tjj.tf. CEEvvhatyoudo, faidheryou
*^ do not execute the ludge-
menc of man but of the Lord. 4.^a4.
Tabic.
The 2. of Efdra$,orhcrwi(c called
NEHEMIAH.
1.4- P^^ ^fter that I had heard theft
things,! fatte down & wept,
and I bevvajlied manydayes, and did
faft and pray before the face of the
God ofheauen, 4.1 2.1 6
5. I pray the Lorde God ofheauen,
mightie,, pfcat, and terrible , which
kcepeit couenaunt and mercy with
them that loue ihee,&c. 3'«7.S
7. We haue bene carried away by
vanitie, and haue not kept thy coni-
maundemcnts, ceremonies, & iudge«
ments , which thou commaundeft
vnto thy feruaunt Mofcs. 3»4.»«
p. 1 4. And declarelt vnto them thy
Sabaothtobcfandificd. %.%.z^
I O B.
\»6. >^Ow on a day when the childre
ofGod came before the Lord,
Sarhan was alfo amonged them.1.14
17.& i.i4.i^.&i.i8.i.& 2.4.;
z 1. The Lord faid therefore to Sathan,
behold , all things that he hath be itj
thy handles ,onely Itretch not out thy
hand vpon him. 1 .17.7
17. And he fpcaking, there came an
other and laid, the Chaldees mad«
three bandes & inuaded thy Camels,
and carried them away , and killed
the boyes with the fworde , and I
only haue ^^d that I may tell it thee.
2.4. z
21. The Lorde hath geuen, the Lorde
hath taken away , the name of the
Lorde be blelTed. 1.17.8.& x.iS.i.ac
1.18.J.& 2.4.2
2.1, And Sathan came amongelt them
that he might ftande in the fight of
the Lorde. 1. 14.17. & I.i4'i5 & «
4.17. Whether f hall a man be luiti-
fiedincomparifon ofGod,or f hall a
man be purer then his maker? j.ia.i
18. Bcboldc, they which feruehim be
notfttdfeft: And he found vvicked-
ncs in his Angels. 3.1 ».i.& 5.17.51
1^. Howe much more , they which
dwell in hovvfes ofclay,vvhich hauQ
a earthly fpuadacian , fhalbe con-
fumcdj.
The Tabic.
fumed, eucnas ainoch,i.i5.i.& i
15.2. &j 12.1.
iy. Blcflfed is the man that is corredcd
of chc Lorde : rcproue noc rhcrcfore
the corredionot the Lorde. J.4. J2.
^.1, Iknovv for a truthth.it itisfo:
And that man shall not be luAiHcd,
incomparifun of God. i.iz.a.
ao.If Ivvoldluftifiemy fclf, my mouth
shall codene me:If I vvolde sho wc
my fclfe innocent , he shouldc make
mcmanifcft to be vvicked. J.»a.5
10.15. And if I shalbc vvicked , itis
woe with me.and if I be iu(t, I will
not lift vp my head , beinge filled
with afflidion and miferie. ^.14 i5
ti.i8. Hclofeth the coller of kings,
and he girdeth their raynes with a
cordc. 4.10.28
tOt He changeth the fpeache of the
faythfull,and takeih avray the lear-
ning of the auncicnt. 2-4-4
13.15. Although hee shall kill me, I
will triiile inhim.a.io.i9.& 3.3.11
14.4. VVhocannemakedeancof vn-
cleane ? not thou onclie which arc
alone. 1 1.5.& j.ii.5
5. Short be the dales of man, the nom..
bcr ofhis mothes is with cbee:thou
had ordeined the limites thereof,
Yvich can not be pafTcd. 1.16 5
17. Thou haftfealcd vpmy wicked-
nes as in abagge,& thou haft had
care of my iniquitie. }.4. 25^
15.15. Beholdc,amongcft his Sain^es
there is none immutable , and the
heaucns be noc deane in his fighc.
}.12 I
t6. How much more abhomin.ible
and vnprofitable is man , which drin
kcth iniquitie as water, j .1 2.T.5
■^.a5. Iknowe chac my rcdcmer li-
ueth, and that I shall ryfe out of the
carchinchclatter dayc.2.io.i5>.& j.
a<5 And I shall bee compafled about
agayne with my skinne, &I shall fee
God ai^jyn in my flefhe. 2.ii> i^.
^y. whom I my felfe shall fee, 1 d
my eyes shall behold and none o-
ther,&c. a.io.iy
21.13. They Icade their daies inhap.
pynes , and in a moment chcy goe
down to thcgrauc. 2.1 0.17
15.5. Behould , theMoone doth not
shine in his fight, &chcStarresbe
not clcane. j.ia.i
25.14. Lo,thcre be parte ofhis waics:
but how littcll a portion hcarew^e
of him? And who canvnderftand his
fearefiiU power? i 17.x.
28. u. Where is wifedome found, and
what place is there of vnderltading?
1.17.1*
21. It is hid from the eyes of all li-
uing,frora the foules of the ayre it is
alfokept clofe. Ibidem.
a J. ButGod vndcrftandeth the way
thereof , and he knoweth the way
thereof. Ibidem.
*8. And he faydvntoman, behold,
thefeareofthe Lorde is wifedome,
and to depart fiom euill is vnder
ftanding. 1 17 a.8f j.2 26,
J4 }o. VVho caufeth an h\'pocritc
to ragine foe the fins of the people.
4 20.25.
J 5.27. VVho rettrayneth the drops of
rayne , and puureth down shower*
inmancr of ftreamcs. «-5'y»
4i«2. And who gaueme firfte that I
should geue him ? againe , al chat ift
vnder the hcauenbfemyne. 3-14.5.
PS A L M E S.
1.1. i-pHe man is blcft that hath noc
■■• led his life according to the
counfel of the vvicked, neither that
hatht abiddcn in the way of finners .
3>«7>o«
2. But his wil is in the Law of God, 5e
in his lavve will meditate day and
nig^r* 271J
2.2. The kinges of the earth ftoodc
together,and the Princes aHembled
in one , ag.iin/t the Lorde , and
againfthis anoy-red. 2.16. j.
J. Let vs brcakc the bands a fonder
and let vs throw from v$ their yoci;.
Ibidem.
4. He that dwclleth in heauen *haU
laughethe tofcorne.the LordshaU
h4ucthc in dcriCon. J.5.i,ac a.ifi.j.
The
S. Aske of mc&t will gtue thee the ge-
tels foraninh«ritauce,&forthy pof-
feflios theeiidcs of the earth.a.ii.ii .
S' Thou s hal c rule them with an yron
rodde,anci thou shall breake them as
an farchcn veifell. i,« s. 5.& 4.1.1^.
12. Laye hould of difciphcjcafte that
the Lordc bee angric,and you perish
from therighte vvay.».6.i.& 4 20. 5
& 4.20.2^.
J.J. Ifleptand flombred , and rofc
vp againe, becau(e the Lordc toke v-
pon him to keep me. j.i.<7.
4.7. The light oFthy countenauce hath
ben fcaled vpon vs. 1.11.14.
5. 4 I will be early prefcnt before thee
& 1 will wearc : for thou art a god
that loueth not iniquitic. 3.20.12.
S. 1 will enter into thy houfe in the
multitude of thy mcicie , and I will
vvorshippcatthy holy temple in thy
feare. ^.2.2j.2c 3.20^11.
€,i. OLorde rcproue me not in thy
fiirie,and corred me not in thine
angrc. 3«4 3»
y.6. ArifeO Lordc in thyangre, and
be thou exalted in the quarters of my
enemies ,&c. j.jo.i 5
^ ludge me O Lord according to my
righteoufnefle . & accordmg to the
inndcencie ofmy caufe. }.i7.i4
S. J . Thou haft made paifc£t thy praiers
by the mouth of infants & fuclings.
5. What is ma that thou art mindcfull
. of him?or the fonue of ma that thou
>ocll viiithim? 1. 5. j.Sc i.i j.2
.JO, And they may truft in thee, that
haueknowcn thy name. ?.i.5i
101?. Hcfaydinhishjrte, Godhatti
forgocten,hc hath tourned away his
face that he should not fee ac the
endc 1.4.1.
J I 4. The Lord in hii holy teple.i.5.£.
12 2. They hauc rpoken valine thingcs
cuery ma to his neighbour: defeytfull
Iippes,&c. 4'»4 8.
^. The words of the Lordc , arc pure
, vvords:av the liluer tried in a fornix
ofcarth fined vij.fould. j.2.15.
t4.>. The fuliihman faydinhis harce
Tabic.
there is no God. Ii4. »
5. The Lord looked from heauen vpon
the children of men, to fee if there
were any that vnderltode orfoughc
after God. }«»4'>
4. There is not that doeth good , no
not one. j.j.j
15.1. Lordc who shall dvvellin thy ta
bcinai-lc ? or who shall red in thy
holiehilJ.^ J-17.6& 3.24.8
2. He chat walketh without lpot,and
workcth I ighteoufneSjWhith fpta-
kech the truth m his hart. ^Mi
16. 2. Thou arc my God and haftc no
ncede ofmy goods. a ?■. 53.
J. 7 o thy Saints that be in eartk:all
my delight is in thcm.i.ii.i4,& 2 j.
53 & 3.7.5.
5. The Lorde is the portion ofmy in-
hcntaunce & cuppe,thou art he that
doft reltore vntomemy inheritauce.
2.1 I.2.& 3 2 5<IO.
10. Thou shaltnotlcaucmy foulc m
hell , neither shalt thou iuftVrthy
holy one to fee corruption. 3 aj-.j
17.1. HeareO Lord righteoufnesrgeue
eare vnto my prayer. 1. 17.14
3. Thou haft proued my harte and viti- ,
ted it by nightc,thou haft tried me by
fier, and haft not found m me iniqui-
tic. Ibidem.
15. I will appcare in righteoufncs be-
fore thy pre(encc,l shall be fatisfied
when thy glorie shall appcare 2.1O.
tj.Qi 3.35.10.
iS.i.I will loue thee OLorde my tor-
titude. 3 ao.aS.
ao. And he brought me into largsnes:
hemademefate,becaufehc would.
?»75
21. And the Lorde shall geue vnto me
according toniy righttoufnellc , and
according to the purents ofmy hand
»hall he geue vnto me. 3,17. 5,& J. 17.
14.
28. By caufe thou doeftfaue the huWe
and thou shake bring lovve the eyes
ofthe provvde. f.ii.6,
31. Thevvoideof the Lorde is tritd
by fier,hc is a defeder of all that truft
in him* .$•»•*$
i^.i The
j^.t.ThehcauesshoTV forth the glory
of God. 1.5.1&164
t. The Lavvc of the Lordc is pure,
conucrting foulcsithc tcftimoruc of
the Lordc is favthfiill, gcuinge wife-
dome to the fimple. 2.7.11. & 4.8.^
13. Who vndcrftandech his faultes,
clenfe me from my feciccefinncs.j.
4.I6.& 3.4,i8.& 3.17-1
ao. 5. Let him remember all thyoffe-
ringes ,and let him make thy burnt
ofF-rings fatce. 3.20. 18,
10. Lorde raucthckinge,5chcarevs
when we call vpon thee. i6.i
a».i . OGodmyGodjVvhyhaftc thou
forfakcnme? ».i(f.ii.
•f.Our fathers trufted in thec:they tru-
fted & thou didcft dcliuer the 3. 20. 2<?.
sd. I will pay my vovves in the fight
ofthem that feare him. 4.1 34
aj.4. For although I shall vvalkc in
the middcft of the shadovve of death
I will feare no euelbicaufe thou arc
with me. 1.17. II. & j t.ii.Sc 3.2.28.
6, And thy mercies shall follovve me
all the d ayes of my life. 2.3.1*.
14 3. Who shall afcend into the hill
of the Lorde?or who shall ftand in
his holy place? 3.6.2.
4» Who hach innocent handes and a
cleanehartCjwho hath not liftvppc
his mtnde vnto vanitie, nor hath not
fvvornc to the deccite of his neigh-
bour. 3.6.2
€. This is the generation ofthem that
(cekehim. 3-4*'^
a5,i. Vnto thee,OLord,haueIlift vp
myfoule* J.io-5.
6. RemcmbcrO Lorde thy tender mer.
cies and louing kind nefle which be
foreucr. 3 » 10.9
7. Remember not the faultes and igno-
raunces of my youth, but according
tothykindnc/Te remember thou me.
3.3.18.& 3.20 5>.
xo. All the waies of the Lorde are mcr-
cyeand truth to the that feeke after
his will.&c. 3. 20.7. & 3.17-2.
11. For thy name fake, O Lordc, th H
shalt be mercifull Tncoroyfinnc , for
it 4t great. }*i7>>*
1 able.
il. Lokcrponmyafnidion& craueil,
and forgeueallmy finnes. 3.20.9.
26.1. ludgeme OLord,for Ihaue wal-
ked in my innocecic&truftinginthe
Lorde, I shall not flide. 3. 17. 14
2. Proue me Lorde, and tryeme,exa-
mincmyraines and hart. 3 20.45*
5. I haue hated the cogregation of the
wicked , and I will not fit with the
vngodly. ' 3. 17, 14,
8. OLordc Ihaueloued thcbeautieof
thyhoufe, & the place of the habita-
tion of thy glory. 1.11.14
9. Dcftroy not my foule with the wic-
ked,and with men of,&c. 3. 17. 14*
27.1. The Lord is my light & my health
whom shall I feare? 1.17.11.
}. If campes shall ftand againftme,my
hart shall not feare. » .1 7. u
lo.My father &mother hathforfake rae
but the Lord hath take me vp 3.2a 36
14. Hope in the Lord, and be ftrong :3c
he will comfort thy hart , & truft in
the Lord. 3.2-»7.
28.8. The Lorde is the ftregrhofhii
pcople,& theftregthofthc fahiatio
ofhisannointed. 2.6.i.Si 2 <! 3.
1 5. 3 The voice of the Lord is vpoii
the waters, the God ofmaieftie hatk
thundred,the Lorde f is) vpon great
waters. 1.^.4,
30.6. Wepinp may.ibide ateuening;
butioy Cometh in the morning. i.»o.$
7. Andinmyprofpentie,! faid,! shall
ncuer bemotjcd:
8. For thou O Lord of thy gondnes
dideft geueltregth vntomybeauti*
thouturneft thy face from me, and I
vras troubled. 3.8.2,
3 1. 1. Ihauetrufte<1 in thee O lordc, t
shall not be cofouded for euer:de!iuer
meinthy righteoufnefle. 3.11.12,
d. I commend my fpirite into thy han.
des , thou haft redcmcd me, O Lorde
God of truth. 3.*o.2^;
16 My lots arc in thy handes. 1.17 II.
23.1 faid in theheat ofmy mind,I acaft
out from the face t>F th;nceie< .3 1.4.
32.1. BIciTedare they whofc iniquities
be remitted , and whpfc (inncs are
couered. 3.4 a^.Sc.j.ii.ii.Sc j.i^t
The Tabic.
II.& 5.17.10,
5. I hauc made my fault knowenvnto
the.', and I haue not hid mine vnrigli-
rcourncii'e. 1 bant faid,I vvill cofeflc
againftmy fclfc vnto the Lord mine
ini<juities,&c ?'4 5fc
tf < For this shall euery one that is holy
intimcconucnicnt,&c .J.20.7.& j,
20.16.
j}.^. The hcaucns were elUblished
by tl>e wot de of the lord , & by the
fpirit of his mouth all the powers of
them. i.i } 15.& i.itf.i.
S ». BlcfTed is the people whofc God is
the Lorde , a people whom be hath
chofen for an inheri caunce vnto him
. felfc i.io 8,6£ j.2.a8.3c j.ai.5,
» J. The Lordc looked from heauen and
fawall the children of men. i.kJ.i
18. Beholde, theeicsof the lordcbe
vpon them thatfeart him , and vpon
them that truft on his mercy, j ao.40
%i. O Lorde let thy mercy be vpon vs
as vre truftin thee. j.iOii
14.T. This poorc man cried, and the
Lordc heard him, and he fa ucd him
from all his tribulations, ^.lo i6.
S. TnC Angellofthe Lordc pi tcheth
round abniic them that feire him > &
he shall deliucr them. i.f4^.6c 1.14.
8 & j.taaj.
15. Depart from euill and do good. ^^
38.
1 6. The eies of the Lorde be vpon the
iuftc,and his cares to their praiers.i.
16.7.& J. 20. J.& J ao.io.
17. The countcnaunccofthe Lorde is
vpon them that do euill, that he may
rootc fro the earth their racmorie.i,
16.17.
9%. The death of the wicked is euill.
> I0.X4 & a. 10 18.
tg. The Lorde redcemcth the foules
ofhis feruauntes. 2.!o.i<J
^6.1. Thevvirkcd man faidtohim fclf
that he might doc euill : there is no
feare ofGod before their eics .i.4''>.
». For he hath done deceitfully in his
owne fight , that his iniquitie may
be found to hatred. ».4. 1.
4L Tliy mcrcie,0 L.or4 , reacbeth vnto
the hcauens , ani thy truth vnto tfw
cloudes. h^'7
7. Thy iudgementes are vvonderous «
depe. 1.17.1.& J. 23 5
10. With thee is the fountamL of life
and in thy light we shall fee light. 2.
37.7. Be fubiedto the Lordeanden- .j
treatehim. 3.3.^7,
22. For bicmfethofe that bcbJeHciJ
of him , shall poflcfl'c the earth; buc
they thatbccurfedof him, shallpc-
rishc. 1. i.t
} 8 I. O Lorde in thy wrath reprouc
me not , neither in thy anger eorre^
me. J«4.J2.
5* Mme iniquities haaegone ouermy
head,&asaheauie burden thcyhau«
vvayed vpon me. j 4. i <J
j^.io I wai dumme and opened not
my mouth ,bicaufc thou diddeltio^
r.17.3
X}. I am a i\raunger and a pilgrime
with thee, as all nay fathers v vere a.
10 15;.
14. Letmcpaufe jthatlmayc come to
my felfc before i depart , and be no
more. j»io. i 6.
40,4. And he put in my mouth a new
fong,a verfe to our God : many sJuU
fee & f€are,& they shall ti uft in the
Lorde. J 20.2<f.& 3.I0. |8.
6. Many haft thou m;tde, O Lorde, chy
marueillous vvorkcs , and there is
none that islike to thee in thoughts*
i.|.y.&r 1.17 t
7. Thou v^'ouldcA not fa<rifice an<i
offering, but thou madeitvnro m«
eareS) ;,22«>C>. jj
8. ThcnIfaJ(l,bcholde,I<:omc :it is
v'/ritten of me in the chapter of the
booke. 2,1 ^.p
J>. Idefired todo thygoodwill,Omy
God, and thy law is in the ooiddeft of^
my hart. 2.i<5. 5
II.. I haue shewed ft>rth thy truth 8c
falnariS. Thiucnothidde thy lou;ng
kindneffe and truth from tlic great
congregation. Ji Ti
? a. ThylouingkmdnefTe Sc truth haue
aiwaics prefcrued me. J'T
41.;. Heale
i
4».y. Healcmyfoule, forlhaucfTnne<l
agjinft thcc. 32012
4 3. } . My Ibulc thirftcd after the (irong
Goa,eiien tlie lining God. whcf lull
I come and appcarc bcfove rhc face
ofOot^? 4. 17. 21
5. J pallVfl to thcHoufe of Cod with
the voice of mirth Sc pfaifej&c. J-4.5>
6, \ vhyait thou faddc my {oiil,.?jnd
why (loclt thou trouble me ?cru(t in
th;- Lordc. 3 2.t6
45. <. Why art thou faddc,0 my 'ouk»?
8c « vnvdoirfl chou trouble me? trult
in the lordc. 3.2. i(f
44.4 Nc-irlier did they poficflc the
l.indfbv theirovvne lVvcrd,&: thefr
(Jvvnc arme did nut fjue them, but
thy right hand and thy arme, and the
light of thy cowntenatice ; becaufe
thou diddeft fjuor them. J-^'-J
21. If vvc haue forgotre rhc name of
our God , and haue ilretcbtd forth
our hads vntoa ftrjngc God. j,2'i ^7
Si. shall not God fcai«.h this our? for
hcknowcththcfccrets cT thciartc.
tj. For thy fake be we (laiiit all the
day long,wce be cAccmcd as I heepe
for the flaughtcr. 3-1 S> J
45 7. Thyfcatc , O God, en (hi ret h for
eucr, the roddcofthy kingdome is a
rodde of dircdion. '-'JP
Z. Thou haft loiicd righteou'ntff. and
hated ini(]uirie , therefore God thy
God hath annointed thee with the
oileof glavineffc abouc tNy conipa
nions. a.i5.s.&: 4.'5».i8.^ 4.10 lO
13. And all the daug' t>.rs of Tirus
with the riche of the p'cople, fhall
do homage before thy f»ce with
giftcs. f.ii.iS
46.2. God is our refuge and ftrcngth,
our helper in time of tribuljtio.3.2.37
J, For all that we will not fcare,
whileft the eart-his troubled , and
•the moiintaines be carried into the
hart of the fca. ?'?7
6. Godisin themiddeft therof,»tfh.ill
notbemoued. 4>'>J
47.3. The lordeishighand tcrr'ble, a
great king aboue all the earth. 1 1 j. 34
1 auic*
5. He hath chofcn vnto Vs his inheri-
taunce , thcbeautie of Jacob whom
hchathloued. S'2i-J
48.51. A$ \Te haue heard, fo we hauc
fctne in the citic of the Lorde of
power, in the citie of our God : God
hath built it for eucr. 1.11.14
II. According to thy name O God,
fuch is thy praifc through out the
earth, thyrigft hand is full ofnghte-
oulhciTe. 3.20.41.&: 4' ^. J»'
49.7. They that trufl in their ownc
Hrengthjand glory in the multitude
o'thcir riches. ^ 2. 10.17
8. He can by no mcancs redeeme his
brother, he (hall not pay his raun-
fometoGod. 2.10. 17
II. When he ihall fee wife men dit%8c
ignorant perfons and foolcs ptrifhe.
2 10.17
I a. The building of them from genera-
tions to gencratios jthey called their
names by their landes. 2. 10.17
13. And man when he \'va.t in honor,
knewc not thereof: he was copjrcd
vhto ff'olifhe bcafles,and he was
made like vntothtm. 2. 10. 17
14, This way vnto them is theftuna-
bling bJockc ofth?m,& afterwardes
blockc oft}
ilch^ht the
they ilchght tTicmlclues in the ho-
nor thereof. 210.17
IS. As Ihcepe they be pur into hell:
dcatii fcf derh vy>on them : and the
rtghceous f hall rule ouer ihcm in the
morning. 2.'0.i7
50.15, And call vppon me in the daye
of trouble: and 1 will deliuer thee,
and tHou rhaic honor me. 3.20. 1 3,28
& 4 17-57
13. He thatonerethvppraire$,he doth
glorifie mc : and this is the vvav by
the which I will f hcwe him the fal-
uation of God. 4.18.17
51. J. Haue mercy vpon mc,0 God, for
thy goodnes fake, & c. 3»4-,ji>
6. That rhoii ma»cft be acknowledged
pure,vvhen tliouhalliudged. I.i8.|
7. Beholde, I' was f^fhioncd in ini-
quitic , and my mother conceaucd
mein/iune. a 1.5.& 3.3.18 & 3.20.^
T i T T
xnc laDie.
12. Create in me OGod,aclcancharr,
and renue a right fpirit within me.
».2.25,a7,&a.3,i>
17. OpcnthonmyIippcs,Olorde,and
my mouth shall «hevvc forth thy
praiTe. J. 20. a 8
i5>. Trie facrifice to God is a broken
fpirit. a contrite and broken hart , O
God,thou wilt not defpifc. 3 20.16
ax. Then thou shale be delighted with
offerings , with the facrifice & burnt
offering of rightcoufneffe, then they
shallay calues vpo thine altar.4.18.17
52.10, But I Yvillbe like the greenc
Oliue tree in the houfc of the lorde.
a.io 17
53.4. There is not one that doth that
which is good. ». J.»
5J.»j. Caftthy burden vpon the lord,
and he shall vpholdc thee: he will
not fuffer the righteous to fall for
eucr. 1.17.6.& 2.10.17
24. Thou in the mcanc time O God,
shall throwc dovrnc theie blood
thirftic and deceatfull ones, into the
pitofdeftruction. 2,10.17
56.5. Ihaue trultedin God,l fcareno
thing that fleshcmaydovntome. i.
17.11
10. So oft-'n as I call vpon thee, mine
enemies geue backe:in thislamaf-
fured,thatthouartmyGod. | 20. j I
13. Iwil make vowcsvnto thcc,0
God: Ivyill she we forth thypraiie.
4.1J.4
59.t t. Thv goodnes O Lord may preucc
mcsbring it to paffc O God,thatI may
fee thy works on my enemies. -2 j 12
6oi4* In God TVe snail do valiantly,
and he shall tread downe our ene-
mies 3.2046
61.9. Pourc out your hartes before
hjm,far God is our refuge. j. jo. 5
JO. The fonnes of menbe vaine ,rhe
fonncs of men be liers : if they were
put in a paire of ballaunce , rhty
would be lighter then vanirie it
felfe. *.}•
U3 4. Thylouing kindneflfe is more to
be wished for then life it fclfe. |.a
28. & J 17.14
65.1, Vntothee , OGod Jspraifcin
Sion, vntothee shall the vovvc be
paide. 3.20.29
3. Thou hearcft prayers , becaufc of
this shall all flcshe come vntothee.
3.2015
5. Bleffed is he whom thou choofeft,be
shall dwell in thy courtes,&c.3.2i.5
68, 1 jr. Thou art gone vpon hy, and
haiUedcaptiuitie,&c. 1.13.11
li. Vnto the Lordc God belong the
iffues of death. 3.>5 4
36. Thou art terrible O God out of
thcholy places;the God of IfracU h«
geucthftregth to the people t.it.14
65>.3. lam fonkedovvne intoadeepe
mier, in the which there isnobot-
tome,&c. 4 7.»J
5. That I am collrained to repay that
Itokenot. 2.16.5
22. Forthey gaucmeinmyroeatcgall:
and when 1 thjrfted they gaue me
vincgcr to drinkc. 4.17*15
29. Lee them be wiped out of the
bookeof tne]iuing,andlct them net
bevYrittcnamongelt thcidft. 2.10
18.& 3.24.9
71.2. For thy r ighteoufnes fake rcfcue
me,anddeliuerme. 3x11-2
72.8. He shall rule fromfeatofca,and
from the fluddes vAtu the cndcs of
the earth. 2.11.1
II. And all kings shall worship him,
and all natiosjhall feruehim. 4. 517
73.2. It wanted but a little but my
fcctevverereadie tofall, my fteppes
had almoft Hidden. 2. 10.16. & 3.^.6
17. Vntill I cntred the fccrcte places
of God , and I vnderftoode what
should become of them at the Ia(t. 2
10.16.& 5.9.6
26, Myfli'shcandl»arti> c6rumed,but
Go«l is the rocke oi my hart, and my
portion for euer ».n.a
74.2. Be mindfull of thy flocke which
thoudiddertpurchafe long agonc'fic
of thine alotted inheritaunce which
thou haft redeemed ; the mount Sioa
in vvliich thou wait wont to dvvclJ.
3.20.14
9. VVf
The Table.
51. VVc fee not our figncs,thcreisnoc
one Prophet more , nor any with v$
tlMtknowcth how long. 215.1
7J,7. For neither from the Ea/l , nor
from the V'Vtft, nor from the bouth
dochpreftrnunt come. 1.16.6
77.10. Whether or not hath God for-
gotten to be nicrcifull?vvill he shut
vphii nicrcie'; in dilpieafurc.^ j.i 17
II* At lain t!. ought, this is myinfir-
nutie , the right hand vrill chaungc
the ct)urrc of th\ moil high, j 2.31
78 8. And let themnot b as their fa
thcrs,a cti!obedJent and rebellious
Baiion,a gentratio that fernocthtir
hartes aright , and whofc fpiritcs
ncucr bclciiedGud truely. 2.5.U
5<5. They flattered him with their tou
tcnauficcs , but they hedvntohim
vvith their toungps. ? ? ^5
37. Their hart was not right coward
him , neither rvcrc they faichfoll m
hiscoucnaunr. J-J-^S
45. He caft vppon them the fiercencfle
of his anger , violence , indignation,
and vcxacion , by the fending cue of
«uill fpirites 1.14.17
^o. That he mightlcauethc Taberna
clc Silo, the Tabernacle where he
dwelt amongcft men. 2.6.1
6j , And he put away the Tabernacle
of Iofeph,aiid chofcnot the tribe of
Ephraim 2.<S 2.& ?.2i.6
70. Andhe chofeDauidhis feruaunt,
from the fiildes of sheepe tookehe
him. 1.6.2
y^.9. Heipe v.SjOGodofour falujrio,
for the glory of thy name, ^ dciiuer
vs , and bemeri ifuU vnto our fiones
for thy names take. 3.20.14
1 3 . And » ve thy people and sheepe of
thypafturc shall praife thee for euer;
and from gencrjiion Co generation
will fet forth thy prauc. 3-7. 10
S«.i. Thou which fitted betweene
the Chcrubins shcwc thy bnght-
nelle. i.i 3.14.& a.8 15.& ^.t 5
4. Iwrnevs againeOGod, andcaufe
thy face to shine chac we may be
faued. 3.z.a8
5* O Lurde Cod of huftes,ho wc 1 ong
wiltthoubc angry againfl thcpraier
of the people.^ j.ioitf
J 8. Let rhyhandebe with thcmanof
thy right hand , with the fonnc of
man , whom thou had made liroKge
forrhyfclfc. 2.6.%
81.U. 1 am the lorde thy God which
hauc brought thee out ol the land of
tgypr. 3.1.JI
82.1. God ftandcchinthe affcmblyof
God , be pldyeth the ludgc in the
midde/tofgods. 4.20.4 & 4. 20.6.&
4.20. a<»
3. Reucnpethcpoore& f.nhcrlclic,!cc
loofc thcmileriiblt(5>: atHicied.4.2C.5>
4. Deiiuer the feeble and needy , from
ihehandes of the vvickcd. 4.20.^
6 . I haue faid , y^u are gods, and you
arc all icnnesuf the molt high. 1.14
5 ^51:420.4
84.1. OLordcfhoftes, howe amiable
arc thy Tabernacles. -^^i 5
3. My loulc longctli 5c faintctfi for the
courtes of the lord, my hart & flcsi'-C
eric vnto the liuing God. s.ii.a
8. They shall gee from llreiigth to
ftrengcli,eche of thtm shall appear*
before God inSion. 4.i7.»i
86.2. Kccpcmy life bccaufe 1 am one
that doth good to other ; O God
keepc thou thy feruaunt. 3.20.10
5. For thou O lorde, art good & mtrci-
full , of great kindnclie vnto .ili that
call vponthec. 3 :.>5
11. Djredt me O lorde in thy vv^yes,
then shall 1 vvalkc in rhy truth; c6-
draine my hart that it mayfcare thy
name. i.i.zj.Si i.y^
88 1 7.Thy furies hath parted ouer me, &
thy terrors haue dcltroied me. 3.4-34
8*114. I haue made a coucnaunt with
my choien,Ih4Ue fvvorne toDauid
myferuauni. 4.i«'7
5. Thy feedc 1 will eftablish for cuiT,
and will let vp thy throne Irom ge-
neration to gtnerarion 4-» »7
31. If his childicii furl'ake my lavvc,
and vvalkc noc in my iudgements.
^^ . , 3.4J2&4-37
32. If rhcybrc3kcmyltatuics,5i: keepe
notmy couiuaui>demtrnt$. 3.4-32
TTTT ij
Ihc
jj. 1 will vifice their tranrgreflions
wlchtheradde, and ch;;ir iniquities
wich vvhjppes. j.4. 32. & 4.1.27
}4. Andmy louingkindneiTevvill I not
uke from him , neither will I falfific
my truth. 3.4. J2.&.4. 1.17
j^.thaueoncefvYornebymyhoIineflc,
I will not f^ile Da'.iid. 2*5J
J7. His fecdc f haJl be for euer : and his
throne fhalbe before me as the funne.
}8. It fhall abide fure as theWoone,
which is a fure vyitnelTe in hcauen.
50.4. Athnufand ycarcs is before thcc
as yeflerday c which is pad, yea as a
watch in the night. J** 4*
7. For we are cofumcd by thine anger,
and by thy wrath arc vvc troubled.
3.4 34
y For all our dayes w^cre fpcnt , thou
being angry vve ended our yeares
fooricr thenarhoughr. 3.25,11
ii.VVhoknovvcchrhe power of thine
anger? as eucry roan fearcth thee, (o
is theindignacioof thy anger fearcc
towardes them, 3.25.11
^i.t. The nan fitting in the fccretc of
the moft high, fhall abide vnder the
fhadovveofthealmightie. 1.17.6&
2.8.42
J. For he will deliuer thee from the
fnarc of the hunter , and from the
noifomepcftilencc. 1.17.11.
II. Forhcvvill commaund his Ai.gclj
for thy fake , that they keepe thcc in
allthyvvaycs. 1.14 6. & 2.8.4?, 8c
3.20.23
1 5. He will call vppon me , therefore
I will hcarehim, I will beprcfent
with him in afflidion, I will dcliuer
him , and will maJfc him glorirns.
9.20,14
52.^. Howe great arc thy workes O
iorde , vvondcffull profound be thy
counfcls. 2.10.17
y, A dullerd doth not knovvq this,
neither doth a fooievndcrltadit.i.j.^
1 3. The iuft fhall florifbc as the Palme,
and fhall growe as a Ceder in Liba -
nus. a.xo.17
1 able.
1 4. Thofc that be Blanted in tlie houf5i
of the lordc, Ihall florifhe in the
courres of our God. 2.10.17
^j.i. The Iorde is king,and is clothed
Tvith maicftie , he hath, 1 fay, put on
ftrength,& hath girded himfelfe,thtf
world alfo fhall be fo cftabhfhed
ihatitcan ndtbcmoued. i.<f. j
5. HolincHe bicommeth thy houfe, O
Iorde, for euer. 1.6.4
$^.M. The Iorde knovveth that the
thoughtcsof man are vaine. 2.2.2$
& 3.14 »
12. Happic is the man O Iorde, whom
thou haft chaftcned , & whom thou
hallinftrudcd in tbylavTC. 3.434
1;?. In the paffions of many thoughtes,
vvichia me tby confortcs recreated
myfosile. 3**0'7
3»>.7. If to day you fhall heare his
voice. $.2.6
8. Harden not your hartcs as in Me-
ribah , and in the day of MalTa in the
wiiderncfre. 2.5'i|
^5,10 Say amongeft the nations, the
Iorde raigncth,& the world fhall be
ft.iblifhedihat itrhakenot,&c.i.tf.3
5(7. ». The lord raigneth : lettheeartK
reioicc : and let the multitude of the
lies be glad. j.6.j
7. VVorfivphimallycgods. 1.13.U
»o. The lord kcepeththefoulesofhis
Sainftes,he will deliucr them out of
thehandesof the wicked. a«io.i<S
II. Light is fowen for the righteous,
andgladneHe for them that be of an
vprigbthart. i.io.iS
^«^.i. The lordrajgrrcthjlctthepeojple
trembleihe fitteth bctwcnc thcChc .
rubins,let the earth be moued. u6.f
&2.S15
5. Exalt the Iorde God and fall downe
before liis footeftoole;for he is holy.
X. II. 15. & 4.1.5
y. Exalt the Iorde our God and fall
dovvnc before his holy mountaine:
for our Iorde God is holy. i.ii.cj
1 00 J . Knowe y e that the lord is God:
he made vs and not vve our felucs:
we be his people and the fhcepe of
hispafture. i,j,6.^ ^.ii $
101. j> I
The Tabic.
lOl.J. Ivvill fetnoYvickcd thing be-
fore mine eyes , I hate chcm thac fall
away, they fhall ncuer clcue vnto
me. ^.ao.p
I. Bctitnc will I deflroy all the wicked
of the lande, that all wicked doers,
may be cut of from the citie. 4. jo-io
103.14. Thou wile arifc , that thou
mayelthauemercieonSion. t.tj.n
16. And all natios fhall fcjre the name
of the lorde, and all the Kings of the
earth thy glory. 1,1 j. 11
it. And he fhall hauc confideration
of the prayer of the humble , and not
defpifc their prayer. 3.20,18
ip. The which fhalbc written for ge-
nerations to come: and the people
that shall be created, shall praife the
lordc. - 3.20.18
»2. That men may celebrate the name
of the lorde in Sion , and his praife in
Icrufalem. j.J0.2<
a6. For Hrit, thou layedft the founda-
tions «f the earth .• and the hcauens
bethevvorkc of thyhandes. 1.13.11
& I.IO.I^
ay. The which shall pcrishejbut thou
doeftabide.and all things shall waxe
olde as a garment, &c, 2.10,15
>8. But thou art the fame for eucr,
& there shalbe no endc of thy yeares.
a. 10. 15
103.8. The lordcisfuJloF comp.<jTion
and n\crcy , flovvc to anger , and of
muchmcrcie. Ji.25>
17. But the louing kindenes of the
lordc , endureth for cuer and euer,
tovvardcs thethatfearehim.2.io.i 5
JO S'hcvve forth the lordc, ye his An-
gels which excellin power, execute
his will in obeying the voice of his
wordes. 1.14.5,8c J. 2O.43
104«2, He is clothed with light , it
with a garment. 1. 5. 1
4. V Vhich raakethhis fpiritcj his em-
baradors,andhisminiftersaHame of
ficr. 1.1^.7
15, Andwincthacmaketh the heart of
man glad , and pile that makethhis
facesnine. f,io,i
%j. All chinas dependc vpon thce,chat
thou maille glue them their meate m
due time. 1.16.1
28 And thougeuing, they do gather:
and thou opening thyhandc,theybc
filled with good things. i.l5.i
2^. But if thou hide thy tare , they .ire
troubled :& if thou take their Spirit
from them, they die, 8c chcy be tour-
nedmtoduil, 1.16.1
30. Againe , liuing things be ciearcd
if thou fend forth thy Spirit, & thou
do«ft rcncwe the face of the earth.
1. 16. 1
1C5.4. Seekealwayes his face. 4.1.5
C. OyefecdeofAbr.iham which lone
him , ye fonnesof lacob which be
his eleft. ?-^'-5
15. He tourned their harts to hate his
people, that they might deale craf te-
ly with his feruaunts. i.i 8.2 2^ 2.4.4
105.3. O blefTed which kt pe ludgc-
ment , and which do alwayes that
whichis right. 5.17.10
4. Remembre me o lordc, with the
fauour wherewith thou fauorclt thy
people, and haue regard of me, with
thy fauing health, tnatlmay fee the
happines that is prepared for tht
elcd, and thatlmay reiolfe theioye 4
ofthypeople. 4.1.4
13. But incontinent they forgot him,
neither followed they his counfell.
3,20 \S
31, And it was imputed vnto him for
righteoufneffe for euer, 3*7'7,8
37. For they k'Hcd their fonnes and
daughters , for facrificcs to deuiis.
4.13.17
4(f. Andmadethembefauouredofall
them that ledde them captiucs.2,4.i5
47. Saue vs o lorde our God , and ga-
ther vs from among the nationsjtnat
wee may confefl'e thy holy name, and
celebrate thy prayers. 7.20.28
107.4. Which vvandred in- the Aa.
fertes , in the ft^litarie place thorovv
pathes , who found not a citi^ to
dwell in. «-5-^
6, They cried vnto the lorde in their
perrils , who dcliuercd thcra out of
their anguifshcCf 3*20*1 s
TTYT iJJ
ij. Then tV cried vnto the lorde in
iheirtiouble,andhcdcliuercd them
from their dittrcs ^.20-15
16. For he hath broken the gates ot
braiTe, & burft the barres of iron.
1 16.9
19. And they cricdalfovnto the lord,
&c. J.ZO.!5
aj. VVlio by his commjiundemciu,
doth Ihrre vp the ftormy vvindes,
which dochlift vponhy,che vvaues
thereof. 1.16.7
3^. Andtheftormebeingftill , he ma
ktththc iea calaiCjfo that the vvau^s
ceaiTc.&T. ».«^.,7
40- For God pourcth c5tcmpt vppmi
Pnnces, and maketh tht-m toerrr m
delcrt places out of the way. ».i8 2
8i.t,x.i7.& z 4.4
4^. VVhofoeMcrtherforeis wife, -vjll
remembrc thefe things, ^nd he • vjJl
cnniider the louing kindncs of ti>c
lorde. i.v?
no 1. The lorde faid vntomyJode,
fit thou on my right hande, vntill I
ni.ikc thy enemies thy troteltolc. i
1 5.5.& 2.16 I ft
4. The lorde fwjre, neither repentcth
[ it hi.Tfi, that thou arte an e«ierla!ting
.|>rit{l according to the order ot .Vic!
chifedek. 2.11.4.& a. 5.6. & 4.!8.2
&4-I9-28
4. MefTias sb.^11 iu;!ge amono the na-
tions , an t all shall be fuliof dead
bodieSjVvhe he shall fmite the lieads
ouer many ti.uions. 115 5
iii.i. I vviU pr.iife the lorde with ir.y
whole liea'^c, in the afTtmblie and
congrcgJiti<»n ofthe In(i:. 4'«4*8
». Greac arc the vvo* kes of the lorde,
which are inquired out of all them
vvhirhWc delighted thervvith.i.i<^.3
le. The beginning of vvifcdome is the
fcareofthe lorde. 2.3.4.& 3.2. j(J
1 1 2. t The man is bl eftc that feareth the
lord , and is greatly delighted with
Kis commjundements. j.17.10
C» The memory of the righteous shall
remaine vntilL 2.10. j^
^. His rrghteoulnefle reroaincth for
euisr , and his home sbalbe exalted
1 able.
withglorie. 2.10. 1 tf
xo 1 he wicked shall not accaine that
that theyclcl'-re. a.io.itf
1 1 3. 6. Andhedoth abafehimfelfe, to
beholde things in heaue and in earth.
i .i6.$
7, Who raifethvp thefeable out of
the duft.and lifteth the poore outof
the durte. i-S'T
3>, Which maketh the barren woma
to dwellvvithafamiliejahdaioiful
mother ot children. 1.1^.7
i\$.i. And Our God is inhcauen,vvho
doth what he will, t.tfi. j.&.i.iS.i
& n8 J.& J. 14.1 J
4. Their Imagfs be filuer and §old, a
worke that vv,is wrought out by
the workeofman. I n.4
8. To whom tlicy be like that make
them, 2^ io ishe,yvholoeuer triifteth
m them. 1.11.4
ii<5.i. llouetVelordebecaufe he hath
heard my prayer ? 20.?8
7. Retourne o Hiy Toulc vnro thy quiet
place , becaufe the lorde hach bene
beneficial! vnto ihee J-z-'T
I 2. V Vhat shall 1 repay the lorde for
all his bencfites bcftowed on me?
J.20. j8
I J. The cup being taken, wherwithall
t'lanks being geuen,l will call vpon
the name of the lorde , for receiued
' faluation. i.io.iS
14. And I will paymyvowes nowc
vnto the lorde be fore all his people.
15. For pretious in the fight of the
lorde,is the death of his Sainifles. 2*
io.i4,& 2 !0.i8
i8. I will paymyvowes now before
all the people. 4'^i-4
117,2. For his louing kindnes doth
excell toward vs,& the truth of the
lorde shall continue for euer. 3.2.7
118.^. The lorde Itanding with me, I
will not feare what foeuer man doth
endcHor to bring againftmc. 1.17.11
18. The lorde hath chaltened me fore,
but he hath not fuffered me that I
should dy. lA>i^
1 5 . Ah lord, fauc I pray thee : Ah lord e
i
The Tabic.
giue I pray chee profperous fuccede.
2.6.2
c5. We wishc vnto him all good
things jthac coramtth in i he name of
thclord & we haiic wished vnto you
good chinges out of chc houfe of the
lord. %.6.%
11^. I. Oblcircdbcihcywhichinchcir
life walkingedo kecpethellraight
yvay,accordingc cochclawcof the
ord. 3*1710
yo. When I do fcckcthec with all
my heart, leccc me not flrayfrom
thy commaundcmencef. a.a.a5.&4
14.S
14. lamdelitcdiBtheYTay of thy tc-
ftimonies, more then in all riches. ;
3.15
18. Pull thevale from my eyes , that I
may fee the wonderful wifdom that
is hid in thy Jarv, i.j.zi
J4. Teach mc that I may hold thy law,
and chat In^aykeepeit with all my
hart. 2.2.25
|<5. Incline my hart vnto thy tcftimo-
nies,and not to coueioufnene. a.^.p
& 2.5.11
41. And let rhy louing kindencs come
vnto mc, & thy ra!uation,accordinge
tothywordc. J'^.ji
4j. And take not altogether out of
my mouth the YvordeoTtrueth, for
Ilookc for thy ludgemcntes. 3 i
17
71. It was good vnco me that thou
dideft hublc mc, that 1 might learne
thy rightcoulnes. }.4»Ji
j6. I pray chee that thy louing kinde-
nclTc may happen vnto me , that it
may comfortc me, accordinge to
thy wordc , that hach giuen hope
vnto chy fcruaunc J.J.4.& 3.30
2o. Lette my heart be holie in thy
Aatutes, chat I be not ashamed, i.a
89. Thy yvordCjO lord, abideth cuer-
lafting in hcauen. 4^.^
^Oj. Hovvc (vvectc is thy wordc vn
to my taft , iruely vnto my mouth
icis i»or^ fwepc^r chenh^nie, i»%
"5
105. Thywordisalantcrne vncon^y
feece, &alightvntomy vvaics.i.'7
3.& 2.7.1 2. & 4.8. tf
III. Thy ce((imonies bauc bin vnto
me aj an euerlaltingc heritage , for
they be the ioyofray hart, J.nJ
113. Ihaue fettemymiode vppon ciy
decrees that I might keepe th mi
vnco the ende, and that for cuer. 2 5
1 1
1^7. Wherefore I hauc loacd thy
prccepces more chen goldc. 32.
133. Framemy fteps according to tiiy
word, and let no vanicy hauc ru'e o
uermc. 2 3 9
121.4. Beholdcjhe ncicher flumb>efh
norUeepechthac keepech Ifrae;!. f
a O.J
130.1. From chc depth of euills 1
hauc called vppon thcCjOlord. ^.20
4
|. If thou O lordc wilt markc ni-
quitieSjO lord who shal Had \ndcr
ic^ }.i2.i.& 3.17.14
4. But with the* is mercy,& thcrforc
thou art feared. 3.3.2.& 3.i6.|
ijr 2. It were cuill with me, if
hauc not compared and iudgcdji
fbule , like vnto a weaned chnSc
with his mother, and my foulein
me is like vnto a v vcane^ childe. 3 . 7
9
ijs.x. Be thoumindefuU, Oloide, of
all thingcswith the which Dauid
hath bin afflided. 3.30.25
7. Let vsgo vnto his tabernacle and
worship before the fooceftoole nf
his feece. 4-»y
II. Of the firute of thy body will I fet
vp thy throne. 3,13.3
1 3. Thclorde hath chofen Sion , and
hath lak^n it vnto him for a feacir.
4,1.17
14, This is my reft fop euer , here will
I dwell becaufe I haue chofcn her.4
« 5
133.3. Becaufe the lord hath cSmaun-
ded that there shalbe tfteir bk ^»ngc
^»ad life cuerlafting, >fU.>
• TTTT nil
The 1
I35.X5. The Idols of the Gentiles be
fihicr Si golcl,avv<.rke broughtforth
by thehandes of men. i H.4
1 3 8. 1. Ivvilcorifefie thee Yvith all niy
whole heart, and before the 'judges
will I praife tht-c. 4.14 8
a. I will confcifc thy name for thy lo-
uing kindeneflc, and for thy trueth.
? 3.7
S. Forfakc not the vrorks of thy hads
3.14 <J
140.14 Surely the righteous wi:l
praife thy name, 3i the vercuous will
abide in thy fight. i.io.iS
141.2 Let my prayer beeftcemedas
infence bt-forc thee, and the liftingc
vp o' my hands as the cucningfacn
fice?. 5 30.14 & 4.18.17
14s. <{. Therefore Olorde I call vnto
thee,&fay.th )uartmy hope& por-
tion in the land ofthc lining. 2.11.2
8. And I will ht vnto the iult as a
crown e^becaufc thou haft bin bcne-
ficiall vnto me. 3.20 2<f
143 2. Dealenot with thy fcru^iut O
lord accoi dmg to the lavv,for the re
is none liuingeiuit before thee. 2.7
5.& j.i»,».& 3.!4.-.6.& 3.17. 14
& I 2 0,K
Yet Ircmeb rthetimes paft, I me-
itatecfall thy workcs. J 2-3'
144 15. lil'fled be ti>e people that liuc
io, yea \i^c'A'-:d be the people vvhole
God islirhe lordc. 2.10 8, ;:. 3. 2 28
145.3 Great is the lord & moft wor-
thy to be praifcd^ whofe greatnes is
<vnrcarchjble. 1.5.8
5. I will talk-; of the comclines of the
maicfty ot'rhy glory, and of thy ad-
mirable woikcs. t.^.S
8, The lord is gracious and mercifull,
pacient and of greatgoodncs.i.io.i
& ? 20.9
5. The lorde is good vnto all , and
his mercie exccUeth ail his vvorkes.
1.5.5
I J. Thykingedome is an eucrlalUnge
kingdom, & thy dominio dock raine
throw out all ages. »->S 24
t8. The lorde is neere to all that call
Vppon him, yea to all chac call vp^
able.
himintrucih. j.zo.j.Sf |.20 7.& j
20.14
15. He doth whatfo««er they \'voiilde
that fearc him, and hehcareth their
Cfies and faueth them 3.20. 5. & 3.20
»3
147.9. Which giuethto bealt their
foode,& to yong rauens that call v-
pon him. 1.16.5
10. H'w doth no tallow of the (Irength
of ah. life , & is not delighted with
the Itggesofman. ' ».2 10
20. Be h;ith not dealt thus vvith al na-
ti.»ns , neither hath he d:. clarcd voto
them his iiKlgemente.s. 3.21^
PR O V E R B k S.
1.7. nr-Hefvare of the lorde is the be»
•■■ ginnint;cof knovvledgc. }
i.i6
2.31. Therighteous sh.)ll inhabit the
earth, and the vpright shall liue long
therein. 2.11. a
22. But the wicked shalbe cut fro the
earth) and th.» cranfgre (Tor shall be
vtterly t.ikcnrhcrfrom. 2 11. Z
J II. B .^•^■2rc thou b<. not againft the
chift^cenicnt ofih;- lord, n)y fonne,
neither do thouiothe ath.s corre-
<3ioi?s. 3 4. 3 2.& 3.8 6
12. FiTwhome the lorde loucth , he
dothcha{l:icc,andhe is deluedwith
him as a firhcr with his chilJe. 3^.(J
8.1 5, By me,Princesraigne,& kingcs
decree Iiiliice. 420,4,7
22. The lorde polTcjTcd meinthcbe-
giiiniMge ofhis vvayes, Ivvas then
before his works. i»37
13. I was ordayued from euerlafting,
and from the beginningc before the
earth. »-»3 7
24. As yet the depthes was not whe
I was formed , as yet the fountaincs
did not abound vrith waters. i. I J 7
& 2.14.8
jr.io. The beginning of wifdom is the
feare ofthelord. $-i.%$
10.7. Thcmemory of theluftislavv-
dable , but the memory of the vvic-
kcdisfilthy. a.i 0.18.& 3.i7.i.<
12. Hatred doth brecde occa/ion of
coeention, butlouccouerethal tre<
(gaffes.
The Tabic.
(paflM. 3.ij.3t.& 3.4-3<5
12. 14. It ihalbcgiucn tocucry man,
accordinge to Ill's vvorkc. 3.18.1
aS. Inchcpaihofrighteoufnes is life,
& the tame doth not lead vntodcath
ij,ij. He thatfcareth thecommaun-
dement.shalbe rewarded. 3.18.1
14. ar. He that contcmnethhis neigh-
bour, finncth : but hcihat dealcch
kindely with the afflidlcd , is blef-
Icd. 3.17.10
26. In the fe arc ofthclordcisaii aHU-
Tci llrcngth, and it shalbe a defence
alio for his children. 3.14.1^
I 5.3. In eucry place the eyes of the
lord dotli bch<5lde the good and tnc
ciiill. 4.r/.Z3
8. The lord doth abhorrc the facrifice
of chc wicked ,but the prayer of the
righteous is molt acceptable vnro
• him. 3 '4«8
1 6. 1. Manne may difpofc his hart, but
the ^unfwcrcof thetongeis of the
Lord. 1.16 6
». To man all his waves dofecmcto
be clc-ine in his o vvnc iryes , but the
lorde doch difpofc the fpjrite,3.ia
4. The lordc doth worke all thingcs
for his owne fake , ye the wic-
ked alfoagiinft the day ofcuill.3.23
6
6. By mercy and truethiniquity shal-
bv- forgiuen , and by the fearc of the
lord ihey depart fromeuill. 3 4. 31
& 3.4.3 tf
5. Thehart of man doth deliberate of
hi? way, but the lord doth di red his
fteppes. '•'7-4
12. To commie wickedncs ought to
be abomin ible to kinoes : for the
throne ought to be established by
luitice. 4.20.10
14. The anger of thekingeis themef-
fenger of deathjbutthe wife manne
canpacifieic. 4.20.3»
3 3. The lots are caft into the lap , but
the whole difpofing of the is of the
lord. 1.16.6
17. 1. Arediciousperfon feekcthone-
ly ftrife , vnto this pcrfon a cruell
niclTcngcr shalbc fcnt againil him.4
20.10
1 5. The lorde doth alike hate as wcl 1
him that doth cleare the wicked, as
him that doth condemnethe innd-
cent. 4.20 lO
18.10. Themmeof the lord is aUrog
towre , the rightcoui runneth thi-
ther and is without the caltiogt- of
earth. 1.13.13.& 3.20.14
J^.17. He doth let out vnto the lord,
whofocuer doth good vnto the
poore : & it shalbe requited him, ac-
cording to his good decde. 3.18.6
20.7. The iijfl. doth vvaike in his vp-
rightne$,his children be biedcd af-
ter him. 2.8. 2t
8, A king fitting m the throne of luc^gc
ment,doth cha(e away all euill with
his eyes. 4 20. co
5). Who will f iy, my heart is cleanc,
I am purefromfinnc? h^^-l
12. The hearing of the eare,& the fighc
of the eye, buth thefc the lord made.
2.4,7
20. He that (fur fcth his father or mo-
ther, his light shaibe put out in ob- j"
fcuredarkcnes. z.S.^jS'^y'
24. ThelUpsof the mighty are ruieji,.-
by the lord, hovve then can a xtiart^c
know his owne vvaycs? . i.irt.6
26. A wife kinge fcattereth t\y^ wic-
ked, & cjufeththe vvheclc to turne
oner them. 4.20 10
21. 1. The heart of the kinge is in the
hand ofthe lord, as the riuers ofvA'a-
tcrs:vvhetherfoeiier he will he tur- ■
ncthit. I »-JJ.2.& 2 4 7.& 4.20,p
2. Euery mannes vvayesfeemeth right
vntobimfelfe. 3.12.5;
2421. Feare thclordmy fonne& the
ki'^g. 4-JO.i*
24. Hethnt fayethvnto the wicked,
thou art righteous r him the people
will curfe, and chc nations shall de-
left him. 4.20,10
25.2. The glory ofthe lord is to con-
feale a thmg fecrete , but the kingef
honor is to fearch out a thing. 3.21.}
4» Take the droil'e from the niuer,aod
mc 1
there jKall proccedc a vcflcl for the
liner : Ice the wicked be caken h-om
the fight of the kinge, and then his
throne shalbc lure throwc righte-
oufnes. ^ 4.20.10
ai. If he hunger that doth hate thcc,
fcdc him:if he thirft^giue him drinke.
a8.5<f
27. As it is not good to catcmuch
hunny,rc he which doth fearch out
gloric shalbc oppreflfed thereof j. 21
a
a^.io. The excellent that formed all
thingSjbothrcvvardeth thefoole,&
the iranfgredors. " } • * 3*4
aS.a. For the tranrgreflions of them
that inhabite thelandc,it cometh to
paife oftetimes chat others rtiIe.4.2o
it
14. Bleflcd is the roan that fcareth aU
vvaies,but he that hardneth his hart
shall ^11 into euill. 2.2.1 j
ap.ij. The poore and the vfurer mete
together, and thelordelightcneth
both their eyC5. i.t6.6
30.^, What IS his name, & his fonncs
nameif thoudoknovve? »i4-7
5, Eucryvvordcof God is pure, and a
«c shield vnto the that Icanevnto him.
4, And not vnto his wcrdcs , IcaU he
reprQuechee, and thou be foundea
lyct> 4»o»7
'^ECCLESIASTES.
>.i I. A Nd I turned my telfc vnto all .
■**• thcvvorks thatmy hads had
vvrnughr,& to the labour thatl had
done,& beholdeall was vanity and
gricfcofminde. a.a.12
J. 15. Thefelfe fame things are wont
to happe vnto me & beaftes:&what
maner of death one hath, the fame
^ hath the other , and the felfe fame
•' fpirici.>»ina!l : neither hath man any
tninge more excellent then beaftcs:
forvvhy all thing is vanity, j.2,^8
SJ. Who knovvcth whether the fpi •
rite of man do afcendc vpvvarde, or
the Ipiritc of bead defccnd dovvnc-
vvard into the earth? i*5'$
7.30. Cod made mviQerighceout.-bue
aDic.
they being made haue foIorvedmS'
ny vaine thoughts. 2.i.io.dc a-5.iS
5>.i. No manknovveth other loucor
hatred of allthingcs that is before
them. j,2.3S.& 3.»}.4
a. All things come a like vnto all :both
totheiuit and wicked, Sec. 1.1^.
9
4. A Hue dogge is better than a dead^
Lyon. 3. a S.J
5. They which liue,kaovv they shall
dye,but the dead know nothingeat
all. J. 20.24
6. Both their loue,harred,and enuy,ts
novve abolished, neither haue tney
longer portion in the vvorlde , of all
thatis vnderthe (unne. 3.20.24
1 2.7. And the fpirite doth return? to
God , which gaueit. i.i5.a.& i.t$
5
Thtfong of S/tlom«»f
1. 1 4. Q Howe me thy countenaunce*
•^ fpeakcvntomejfor thy voicf
will be vnto me fvvete,& thy coun*
tenance louely. 1.11.14
5.3. I haue put of my cote, and ho vvc
shall I put iton againe } and I haue
washed my feetCjhovve shall 1 de-
file them againe? i.itf.4
ESAI.
i.ji'-j-'O what purpofe should you be
* fmitcen any more ? for ye fall
avvaymore and more,eueryheade is
fickcj&eijery hartisheauy. ?.4.3|
10. Hearcthevvordof thelordyety-
rantes of Sodom , and thou people of
Gomorra hcare the law of the lord,
4.1.1$
1 2. Who rcquircth that at your
handes? 3»4.»5
13. Bring no more oblations in vaine,
infencc is anabhomination vnto me:
I can not fufFcryour ncwe Moones
orSabaothes.&c. 2.S.34.& 3.14.8
14. My foulehatcth your new Moones
and appointed fcalles.-rhey make me
weary. 4. 2- 10
15. And when you ftretch forth your
handes, I wil hide my eies from you,
& although you multiplyyourpraier
1 will act hear c, fur your handes t^e
fiiU
The Tabic.
• lull of blood. )-»o»7
16, Takeaway all naughtincs. 3 3.8
17. Learne to iioewcll, fcekeiudge-
met,relecuc theopprclIed,iucige the
fatherlert'e,anddcicnd the widow. i
8.52.& 3. J. 8
s8. If your finneswereas crimfon,thcy
shalbc made whiter then fnovve:
and though they were as reddeas
fcarlctjthcy should be made as woll.
3.4.2P
19. Tfyouconfcnt and obey, you shall
cnioy the good thinges of the earth.
2.S'IO
*0. But if ye refufc aad be rebellious,
you shall be dcnoured with the
A'vordjbccaufe the mouth of theJord
hath fpokcn it. x.5.io
S 8. Their land was full of idols, they
worshipped the vvorkes of their
ovvnehandes, and that which their
fingers made. 1.11.4
J 1. Behold the gouernour the lord of
holies will take from leruia'cmand
luda the valiaunt and mighcie."euen
all the ftrength of bread and water.
1. 16. 7
3« And I will make children their
princes, and effemmaceperfons shall
rule them. 4.20 15
4.1. Onely lettcvs be called by thy
name , and take away our reproche.
j.io.a?
5.8. Woe be to them that ioinehoufe
to hourc,and held tofifld, continu-
ing till there be none le ft, &c. 11 8.1
& 2.4.4
•a(>. And he shall raife vp a fignc to
the people that be a farrc of,andvvil
hilTe vnto them from the endes of
the earth, &c. i.i9'9
6,1 1 favve thelordefit vpponahigh
throne and lifted yp» and his lower
partes did fill the, &c. 1.13.11.&1
IMJ
1. TiieScraphins ftoodevppon it, c-
uery one had fix wing ef. X.11.3.&1
14.8
5, Wo vnto mc,for I am brought to
/]lence,brcaure 1 am amannehauing
ptillucedhps. 4*8. J
t. Then flue one of the Seraphinsto
me, hauinge in his handc a burninge
coaicjtaken from the altar with the
tongcs. I.I 1. 1
5>. Hefayd , goand fayvniothispeo-
plejinhearingyeshallheareand not
vnderltande,&c.i,i3.i5.& 3.23.1 1
& ^24.'|
10. Make the heart of this people fat,
and make their eares dull, and shuc
their eyes, leaft they fee with their
eycs,&c. 2.4.J
7.4. Take hcdc,be ftill,fcare not,nci-
ther be faint harted , for the two
tailesof thcfe fmoking firebrandcs,
&c. 1.17.11.& 3.2.17
I 4. Beholde , a virgine shall con-
ceaue and beare a lonneand thou
shalt call him Immanuell. 2.6. 3.&1
xS It shal come to paffe in that time,
that the Lordc fhall hifft for th«
flics that be at the vttcrmod parte
ofthe riuer of Egypcand for the Bee
that li in the 1 jndc of the Affinans.
? 44
8.14. Hcshalbeas a fanftuary : but;!
Hone ofotfcncc and a rocke of ruine
to the two houfes of ifrael.i.i 3.1 1,
1 6. Binde vp the tcftimony : feale vp
thelaweamongemy difciples. 3.2*
10
17. I will looke for the lordc who
hath hid his face from the houfcof
lacob , and I will looke for him. 3 . »
4X
18. B.hold, I and the children whom
the lord hath giuenme,&c. 3.22.10
^.6. A boy IS borne vnto vs,a fonne i$
giucn vntovs, vvhofegouernmenc
IS vppon his shoulder , and his
name shall be called Wonderfull
Counfeller , God , the mightie lord'
the euerlaftinge father, the prince of
peace. 1.13.5.& 3.1S.1.& i.iy.6.& j
12. But hishandcas yetis ftrctchcd
^^^* 4. 1 ".at
10. 1. Woe vnto them that decree
wicked decrees* 4.30.2^
Ihcl
5. O the rod ofmy fury , and the ftaffe
in cheir hands is my indignation t.i8
I. & 4.20,25
$. Irvillfcndchimtoa diflemblinge
nation, & againit a people that hath
defcrued my wrath yvill I com-
maundehim, thathe take the fpoile
•ndpray, andtorreade them vndcr
£eetc like the mire in the Areete«i«i8
t%. It will come to paffe rvhen the
Jordc will make perfedlhis whole
vvorkeinSion andinlcrufalem,&c.
i.iSc
15. Shalthcaxeboafthimfclfe againft
him that hevveth tbercvvith ? or
shall the favveexalt itfclfc againft
him that moueth it ? as if the roddc
shouldelift vppeit felfc againft him
thatcaricihit, ortheftafFc shoulde
exalt iifclfc as though it were no
vvod. »'4.4
II. 2. And the Tpirite of the lordc
shall reft quietely vpponhim, the
fpjritc of vvifedomc and vnderftan-
dingc, the Tpirite of couofcll and
Jlrength , the fpirite of knowledge
and godlincfle. 2.1 5. 5. & 41^
22
3. And he shall make him prudent in
thcfcare ofthclord,for he shall not
iudge after the fight of his eycs,ncil-
therreprouc by thehearingaof his
earcs 2. j.4
4. With the fpiritofhis lips, shall he
kill the wicked. l.ij.15
j.They shal not hurt nor waft through
outall my holy hil,&c. 4,20.10
10. And at that day the roote of leiTc
shall ftandevp for a fignevnto the
people, the nations shall feekc vnto
it. ^'^h^'S
l»,i. I vvilpraifethecOlordjbecaufe
thou art angry with me , thy wrath
is turned 4VYay, gcthou comforteft
roe. ^4•?2
14.1. The lorde shall haue compaftion
on lacob; and 7vil yet chofe Ifraell.
47. The lorde of hoft determininge it,
who shal difariul it?de vvhea he b^tii
able,
ftretched out his hande , who shall
turneitavvay? 1.17. 14
15.18. Inthatday, there shallbefiue
Cities in the contrcy of Egypt, fpea-
king the language ofthe Cananites,
& shall fweare by the lordofholtes,
&C. 2.8.2J
15), Inthatday, the altar ofthe lorde
shalbeinthcmiddcftof thclandeof
Egypt. 4.18.4
»i. The lord shalbcknowen ofthe E-
gyptians , and the Egyptians shall
know the lorde in that day & do fa-
crtfice and oblations, and shall vow
vowes vnto the lord, and performe
them. 4.18.4
25. VVhome the lorde of hoft hath
bleffedjfayingeiblefted be my people
of Egipc & Aft'hur,the works of my
handes. 1.18.x
2 5.1. Thou haft done wodcrful things,
accordingeto thy counfell of olde,
with a liable tjucth. 1-24*4
8. Hcwilldeftroy death for euer,&
the lord will wipe teaies fro euery
face,&c. J.p.^
y Loe this is our God,vve haue way-
ted for him,and he will faue vs.i.i 3
10.& I.I 3.2 4
26.1. We haue a ftronge Citiejfalua-
tion shalGodfctfor wallcs & bul-
warkes. i.i7.4>
I J?. The dead shall liuc,and as my bo-
dy shall they rile:avvake,and fing ye
that dwell in duft,&c. 3.xo.2i.*& j
21. Behold, the lord commeth out of
his place , to vifite the iniquities oF
the inhabicauntes ofthe earth , and
the earth shall shcwefoorth their
blood, and shall no more hide her
llaine- J-^S.S
28.1^. He which beleueth shall not
make haft. i ij.15
2j>.i J. Becaufc this people come neere
me with their mouth, and do honoi:
me with their lips, but their hartis
farre from me, and their feare to-
vvardesme was taughtby the pre-
ccpcesofmen,6cc.j.Jo.7,3i.& 4i<>
14. Tbcr^"*
The Table.
14. Therefore beholdCjIvYillalfo addc
thereto, that I may vvorkc marucl-
loully with this people ,cucn mar-
ucU and wonders; that is, the wife-
dome of their rvife men shall perish,
& the vnderftiding of cheir prudent
men shall hide it felfe. 4 io.(?.
jO. I. VVoc vnro the rebellious chil-
dren,faithchc Lord,which dare take
counfellbutnotofme ,&c. }.30.2S.
S 5. In being quiec and keeping filence
shall be your llrength. J-i-37'
J J. Tophet IS prepared morcouer log
agonc : this is alfo prepared for the
king : O how deepe & wide he hath
made it, his invvarde parte is Hre and
muchvYodde, thcbrethofche Lorde
likcariucrofbrimftone doth kindle
ic. 3.3^.12.
1 1. 1. Woe vnto them that go down
to Egypt for aide, & itayc on horfes,
& hauc trufl in cha riots, bicaufe^they
be many. 320.28.
7. For in chat day euery man shall catt
away his images of liluer , and his i-
mages of goldc, which your vricked
hand did make vnto you. t.it.4.
3}. 14. fhefinneriinSion shall be
afraide , feart shall podclTe the hipo-
crites , chey shall fayejwhichc of vs
shall abide with the confuming fire?
whoamongcd vs shall dwell vvich
the euerlalting burning? 3.ii.i.&: 3.
17.5
%iy The Lordc is our fudge, the Lord
is our law geuer,ihe Lotd is our
kingjheshallfaucvs.z.io.S.Sc 2.1 5 5
14. The people that dwell therin shall
haue their iniquiticforgeuen them.
4.1 30
35.8. And there shall be a path ,3nd a
way, and it shall be called the hoi v
way, & the polluted shall not parte
thereby. 2.6.2 5r 4.1. 17.
J7.4. Thou tberfore shalt lift vp thy
prayer for theremnaut that are Icfr,
3 20 5.
1^. O Lorde ofhnftes , God of Urae],
which dvvelleft betvvene the Che
rubin\, thou art oni.'y God ouer all
Kbck)ngdointsofchcc4rth. 2.8.15.
3 2. Bicaufe i remanant shall goe fortl^
of Ieruralcm,and the faued out of
mount Sjon. 4'i<4«
3 J. Fori vvilldcfende this citie,thac
I maycfaue it for mine owne fake, 9c
for my fcmaunt Dauids Ukt. 21 7. j.
36. Wherefore the Angcll of the Lord
went out, and (mote in the campf
of the Alfirians one huqdreth foure
fcoreand/iue thoufand. i,i^.6»
38.1. Thus faith the Lorde , put thf
houfe in a readinefTe , for chou^halc
dieandnotliue. 1. 17. 12 & 3.3 4.
J. O my Lord , remember I pray thee
that I walked befoic thee in faith, 8c
with an vprieht hartc, & that I haue
done thofe tninge* chat pUafe thee*
3.20.10.
5. Beholde,Idoaddevnrothy daic*.
ij.yeares. I.i7.i2,
8. Bcholde, Twill bring againe the
shadowe the degrees whereby it it
gone dovvnc intbeDiall of Achax.
4. 14*1 8*
2o« The Lordc rvus reaoy to faue roe,
and wc vvill celtb.-ace my fongAll
the daies o f our lite in the houfe of
the Lorde. }.aa28i»
}^.<S. Btholde, the daies come that all
that is in thy houfe, & which thy fa-
thers haiie laid vp in liore vntiJJ thi»
day shal be caixiedto Babilo,nothig
shall be left , faith the Lorde. 1.8 .7,
7. And of thy fonues that shall pro-
ceedi out of thee , and which thoa
shalt beget, shall becaried away,
& rhey shal be hunuchcs in the place
oftheknigofBabilon. 3.8.19.
40.3. The voice oFa crier in the wilder
ncrtc,prcpareyi.- the wayof the lord
make i^raight in the dcfertapathc
for our God. J-i-i*
6. Avoicedidf.iy,Crye:&Ifaid,vvhac
shall I cryc?&c 2.j>,5.& 2.10.7.
11. He shall fcede h:s flocke as a Ihepc-
harde. 4.1^ 34,
12. Who huh meafured the waters
vvich his filtc ,an.l counted heauen
with his ipjnne, and < on)prchcndc<i
thcdult; ol the earth vviiuhis three
finder*? 3.».i»".
The Tabic.
I
13, Who hath indru^ed thcfpiricof
the Lordc?or who was of his coun-
icli and hath caught hitn?4. 1 S.i $.8c
4192.
17. All people before him be as nothing
and , they arc counted to him Icflc
then nothing and vanitie. 3. -.2 5.
18. To who therefore vvj]! you make
God like ? or what image vyill you
fetvslikehim? 1. 11. a. 12.
91, Hath not this bene shewed you fro
the beginning of thing.s ? haucytJU
not bene taught hy the foundations
ofthecjrih? i.ii.4.£; 1.14,1.
%2. Vvhofittethvpo the circleof the
carth,&c. i.j 5.
a5» He gcucth rather ftrength to the
vrerie , and vnto him that might
faiU'th , he doth tncreafe power . ?.
2.10
41.7. So the vvorkema comforted the
founder , and he th.it fmote with
the hamer him that fmoie by courfc
faying , It is ready for the Ibdering:
^hefalicncd this image with nailes
thaticshouldenotberaoued out of
his place. 1.11.2.
jp. I haue chofcn thee and not calt thee
avvay. 3 2 '.5.
25. Behold, they arc all vainc, & their
Tvorkes be nothing,thtir images arc
vvindc andconfufion. i.ii.a.
45.1. BchoId,my reruaunt:IvvillAaye
vpponbim,&c. 214.2.
S. 1 will not gcue my glory to an other
nor my prayers toc^rued images.i.
*$ 9
5, Bshold.the former things haue come
topalie , and 1 shew new thi/j^es,
the which i declared vnto vou be-
fore they happened, ' i.i.j
10. Smg vntocheLordca newc fong,
fing forth hu praiCe euen vnto t;ic
outmoft partes of the earth. 3.20 28
1 3 . ihe Lord shall go forth as a Gi int
he shall ilirre vp his courage like a
man ofwarrt-. 4.i«j ^4.
4P. Feare noc , for I haue reufoicd
thee: I haue called thee by thy Ocime,
thouartminc. ?-2.J««
iO; You are asyvvunelles, faith the lord
& my feruautjWhotB , I haue chofeh.
therfore ye shall know and boleuc
me, and ye shall vndeiftandc that I
am;before mc there was no God for-
med,neither shall there be after mc.
1.7.5.
II . I,Ifay I am the Lorde,& bcfidcs mc
thereisnofauioi;. J«4o» 5
25. 1,1 my fclfc ameuenhc whichdo
blot out thy tfanfgrellions, and that
for mine own iakt- , and I will not
be mindfullofthy rinnes.i.i3.i2.& j
4'5-2S-& 3,20.4$
44.?. Iwilipoure ouc waters vppon
the thirftie,^: fluddes vpon thedrye
ground , that is, I wdl poure out my |
Ipiritc vpon rhy feedc,& my blelling
vpon thy buddes. 2.2. 10.& 5.1.3.6c
3.2.J5>.
6.t am th? firft&I am the laft,&belide$
mc there is no God. 1. 13. 23.24.
I a. The Imith taketh an inftrumcnt 8c
vvorkethiu the coales,&:fjtshioneth
it with hammers , andworketh it
with the Itrengthofhisarme :buc
he hungereth in the meane time,fo
that his flrcngch faileth , neither
drinketh he vvater,fo that he falicth
downewerye. 1.11.4.
22. 1 haue put awayc thy trafgreffios
as mifles , and thy Hnnes as a cloud,
returne therefore vnto mc, bccaufe I
haue redeemed thee. 3 4 2 p
45,1. Thus faith the Lorde God vnto
Cyrus his annointedjvvhofe right had
1 haue holde,tliatI might fubdue n»
tions before him : Therfore will I
• weaken the loynes of kings, and opS
the doores before him, and the gates
shall not be shut. 1.87.
7. Making light and creating darknes
waking peatcd: creatinge euilhlthe
Lord doe all therc.i.i7.8.&'.i, i8.}
p. Woe be to him that ftriueth with
his maker, the potfhearde with the
pctshardesof the earth:shal the clay
faye vnto him that fashioneth it,
what make ft thou ? or thy vvorke,it
hathnohande'.? 1.XI.2,
»}, Eueryknec shall bowe vnio me,
andcucry loungcshalirwearebymy
name
The Tabic-
■«mc.i.i3.ii.dri.i3.a3.& 3.5S. dc
j.25.7.
45. The whole fccdc of Ifrael shall
be iullified and glorified in che Lord.
i.t }.2.& 3.14.16
45.5. To VThoms will you make me
like or'equall oae ,or copare me, that
Ishouldcbcelikevntohim? i.ii.a.
47.6. I trucly was angrye with my
peoplcjchat I did profane my inhc-
ritaunce. J'4'P«
48.10. BeholdeJhaueBned thee, buc
notasfiluer :I haue chofcn cheeap.
proued inthefornace of aHHi^ion.
3 4.J»
i^.ThcLordc God and his fpirite fcnt
me. I.I}. 14.
4^. I 5. Doth the mother forgctte her
infante , thac she shoulde not haue
copaflio on the (bone of her wobc?
8cc. I.17.6.& j.zo.jtf.
aj. Andkinges fhallbe thy nurfe fa-
ther, and Ctucencs thy nurfes, &c,4
20.5.
51 .6, The heauens shall vani(h avvaye
like fmoke , & the earth shall vvaxe
oldelikea garmet,5cthcy ihatdvvtl
therein shall in like manner perishe,
but my faluation shall continue for
cuer,and my Tighteoufncilc shall not
faile. a. 1 0.1 s
521. Arife: arife: putonthy Ilrength
O Sion put on the garment ofcomc-
linefTe O Icrufalcm, the holy Citie:
for henceforth there shall not come
into thee the vncircuncifed and vn-
cleane. 4.i.i7.& 4,5.17.
3. You were fold for nought, & ther-
fore you shall be redeemed with.
out money. 3.4.2$.
7, OhovvbeautifuII vpon the moun
caines be the feete of them that de-
clare and publish peace. 4 3 3-
5 J.I. Who hath btlcued our prea-
ching?& thearmc oi the Lord vnto
whom hachic bene reueled? 1.7.5.
& 3 22.10.
4. Where is notvvithftadiug he bore
our infirmiics,& carried ourgr-^vtes
buc vv« eftecRied him pl.^gued with
ehtftriking of God,anaatniacd.2.i 3
4.»}.4.»7.»4.i7.iy
3. But he was wounded for our trad%
greffions,& vTas broken for our itii-
cjuitics , thepaineofour corredioa
was put vpo him, &by his woundes
health is vnco vs. 1.1 a. 4. & 2.16.5.3c
2.i<?.j>.& a.17.4 & 34.^0.
6, All .We like sheepe haue fbraied,
eueryone hath followed his owne
vvaie$,and the Lordc hath laidc vp-
pon him the iniquitic of vs all. a.i(*
<J.&.j 4.27 & j,i2.5.& 3.24.if.
7. Hcwaspiinishedand afflifted, yet
he opened not his mouth he was
led as a ihcepe vnto the flaughtcr,ac
he was /till as a Lambe before the
sherers ,aad opened nut his mouth*
2.1<.^
t. Without delaye&vvichout judge
ment was he taken, & vvhoihall
she we his generation? for he was
cutteoucofthelandeofthe liuin^,
&c. 2.1$.).
10. YettheLorde would bre.ikehicn
in weakening him , that wht-n he
shoulde make his foule an offering
for nnne,he might fee his fccdc,&c.
».7.z.
11. For he shalbeare their iniquities,
2.15.S.& 3.11 S.
12. And he was reckened aiicmi^ the
tranfgrcflbrs. 1.16$.
54,13. And all thy children shall b«
taught ofthe Lord, and much peace
shall be to thy children. 1.7.5. & *•*•
20.& j.ao.io.& 3. 24 14.
551. O , all you that third , come to
the waters, &; you that haue no mo-
ney come,bye mcaccand c 'tc,&c. a.
2.IO.& 3.1, J. & 3.15.4
s. Wherefore do you lay out your mo-
ney, & not for that whiche is meace
and your labour for that that doth
n<'tfati.sfic? 3. 1 4. 1 5. & 4.10 15.
J. Enclinc your earcs and come vnto
mcjhdrkcn and yt.ur fouls shall liue,
& I vvilKtrikcan euerlaitingcouc-
nninc with you , cucn the fure mer-
cies ofDauid. a<5,3&3.2.<S
4 Beholde, Igauehimfbr a witncfTc
cu thg pioplcj for a princs & maiftor
The Tabic.
~ vmo the people. 2.tf.5.& i.ij.u they make halle to slie4 innocent
4. Seckethe Lordvvhilcft he may be
foud,callyevpon himvvhileft he is
nccre. 3.3.20.
5^ I. kccpcIudgementanddoTiilticc
for my faluation is ac hand co come,
& my righteoufnestobe rfcuelcd.3.
3.20
t. Blcfl'cd is the man that doth tnis,&
th:; fonnc of man that layeth hoJdc
of it , tliatis to fay, kcping the Sab-
biOud : chethoughtes of them arc
vaine thoughtesjdcfolarion and de^
ftru<ftion is in their pathes. 2-j.i.
16. And when the Lorde did fee f and
that being .^bashed and vvon.lrtd)
that there was none,th.)t there was
none I fayejthacvvoulde offer him
feifi.,he made his arm'.' the faui. garde
thereof, and his righteoufnelVe did
fuflaineir. ^.'-4.6.
batlithat he pollute it not,acc.2..8. 17. Hepucon rightcoufnesfora breft-
bring to my holy
7. Thofe Willi
mountane, and make thcmioyfuUin
iry houfc of prayer , there facrificc
and burnt olfrmges .shall be acce-
ptable on my altar , bicaufc my houfe
shabc called the houfc of prayer for
all people. j.16,2^.
10. Thejr vvatchmen are all blinde*
they haue no knowledge , they be
dummc dogges, &c. 4-9'}'
57.1 5. Thus laith the hie and excelienc
he that inhabiteth the etcrnitie , &
vvhofc name is holy, &c. j.12.6.
58.5. Is it I'ucha fall that Ihauccho-
fen,th.icama should aiflitlhis foule
for a d.iy,or that he shouldc bow his
hcad?&c. 4.12.15;.
<. 'And doe not T choofc rather
this faft,tolofe thebandes ofmiqui-
tie?&c 3-5. ^'
7.' And hide not thy felfe from thine
ovvm; flesh. i'7.6.
5, Then thou shalt call, and theLorde
shall hearc : thou sh^lt eric , and he
shalil'iy,here I am. 5,20.14
■J. Tf thou turne avvaythv foote fro
. the Sabbath, fo that tlum do nit thy
own will on my holy day ,&c. 2,8.
31. & 2,8.34.
5^,1. Bcholde,the Lordes ha.ndisnot
.shortiicd,that he can not f?ue , nei-
ther is his care heauie that it can not
hfare. ?.ii.2».
a. But your iniquities haue feperated
betvvent vou .ind voiir God, & your
{inncs hath hid his face fro vou, that
hs will not heave ?.i2 1.8c 3. 11. 21,
7.' Theit fecte do runae to euill, and
plate, and the helmet of faluation on
aishcad,&c. j.ii.12.
»o. And the redemptor shall corr-e to
Sion,andvnto them that turn; frona
their wickcdnes in Jacob. 3. 3 20.21.
2». My fpirite which is vpon thee, SC
my worde which I haue put in thy
mouth, shall neuer depart out of t!-,y
mouth , neither out uf the mouth of
thyfecdc,&c.i.7.4 &.i.^.i. & ij.1,5
60.2. Bcholde, darknefle shajlcouer
the earth, and a mill the people, but
the I-ordc shall rife vpon thee , and
his glory shall appeare vpon thee.
2.3.1^
6. All they of Saba shal come,bringing
golde & incenfe , & they shall shew
forth the praifes of God. 4«fri7.
7. All the shepe of Ccder shall be ga-
thered vnto thee. 4 5 '7»
15^. The Sunne shall fcrue thee no more
for dayc light, and the brightneJFe of
the Moone shall not shew to thee,
&c. a. 2.10.
<Si.i. Thefpirireof thelorde God is
vpon me , for becaufe the lorde an-
nointed me, & fent me that I should
she\-vglad thinges vnto the vvcakc,
&c.^.l%^.8c 3.3.iO.&3.4 3 5c 3 12 7.
5. And they shall be called trees of .
righteoufnefle , and the planting of
the iord,thathcmioht beglorifie«t.
3i4.tf.
6^. 10 But they did rebell and vexed
his holy fpirite, i. .- 3.1 5.
16. For thou art our father , though
Abraham be ignoraunt of vs,and If-
raell knovveth vs not, thou Lord art
ourfather,Ottrrcdemer.j.20.a5.3<5.
*7»
The Tabic.
17. Olordc, why ha f^ rhoumade vs
toerre from thy vvayrcf. ? vvhyhjlt
thou ha: deneci our heart, s that vvc
shouidc noc feare thee r i^.^M Jtj
2t
<f4 5. Beholdc thou art angry bccaurc
vvc hauc rii>ned, J.IO.S
6. VVt hauc b !i ,il as anvnchnc th;ng,
& aIlournj;hicoufntrtcisa« a filthy
cloth , & we all iio fade like a le;*tc,
&c. } 2.^-5
lERfiMY.
i,^ •x Lord God , beholdc, Icannot
^ fpcakc, for 1 am a childc.4.8
5
5. Behold, I haue put my vvordc into
thy TDcuth. 4'8«J
10. Beholcie tliisday haue 1 Cct theeo-
uer the nat ions and ouer kingdoms,
to pliickc vp and to roocc out , & to
deftro) and fcattcr, that thou maiii
build and plar.t. 4-3. j
6$, I.- I haucbin fought of them that 2.1 j, Fof my people haue committed
asked not; I was foi.nd ofthtm that
(ovi>hcmcr!ot,&c. J •'4'*
a. 1 haue ftretcbcd out my hanues
all the day to a rebellion*; people
which go not ma good way. ?.a4
16
16. He that will blefT'e himfelfi' in 'he
earth, shall blclTe hiinitUe in 'he
true God : and he that will Iwejre,
$hall iVvcarc by the true God,ivc.2
14, It shall come to p.-.flc,that berurc
they call, 1 will ar.lvvcie : andas yet
they fpeakingjlvvill hcaie.j.20.i4
15. They shall no more hun n*)r de-
ftroy in anyholy mountainc, &c. 4
aoio
46.1. Heauen is my throne , and the
earth is my fooreftoole-.wheie- is that
hou(e therfore that you build forme?
and where is that place of my reft ? j
ao. JO.& 4.17.14
». Buttowhoshnl 1 haue reg.ird, but
vnco him that is humble & of a bro -
ken fpiritc , & who doth tremble at
my word. 3.11.6
2i. Foras the nevve heauen and the
new earth that I willmakesha! rc-
mayne before mc,fayth the lordc, fo
shall your fcedc and name continue.
2.10 iz
4 J. And there shalbccontinuall new
Moones and continuall Sabaothes,
andallfleshe shall come that it may
worvhip before me. 2.8. jo
»4. Their vvormes shall not die, and
their fire shal not be put out, & they
shiiil bs lothfomc vaco all flesh. 5 . 2.;
1%
tvvoeuills, they haue forfakenme
the fountaine ofliuingc waters , to
digge the pits,euen broken pits that
can holdt; I'o waters. ? 20.14
J'l . They fay, if a manne put av\-ay his
wife, and sKe go from him, and be-
come an other mans, &c. 2.8.j8.& 4
1.2$
3, liftvp thycicsvnto the high pla-
ces ,& bcholde where thou b^ft not
playd the harlot. &c. 2818
12. Go and eric theftvvords toward*
the North , &' fav/thcu difobedient
irratl,retuvne faith the lord, &I vvil
not let my \ vrath fall vpon you : for
I ammcrcituli.&c. A-^-'if
4.1. OIfrael,ifihou returne, reiurnc
vntome , iaith thelorde-ind ifthoa
put away thinr 'bliominations out
ot my light, then shalt thou not rCr
moue. 2.5.10.& J.j.tf
4. Brcakfivp your fallow grounoe,&
fow not among the thornes;becir-
cumcfed to the lord, and take away
theforcskinnes of yourhartes, ye
men of ludah , and inhabitauntes of
Icrufalem.&c. 2.5.8 & 3.3.<5j7.& 4
i6.it
p. And in that day,rayth the lord, the
heart of the king shall perishc, and
the hart of the princes, & the prieft
shal be 3ftonished,and the prophets
shall wonder. 4.9.^
II. At that time shal it be fayd to this
people, and to Ierufalem,a drie wind
in the hie places of the vvildernes,
Cometh toward the daughter of my
people, &c. 1. 16.7
1 4* O UiuisdcWt wash thine hart £r»
WW
The Table,
vvickednefre,&c. a. 5.8
5.3. O lordc, are nor thy eyes vppon
thetruech? thou haft ftricken them,
but they hauc notforrovved : rhou
hafl: confumed them , but they haue
rcfufed torcceiuccorreftion : they
haue made their faces harder then a
ftonc, andhaacrcfufedco turnc.>.4
95.& 3.14.8
7. Howe should I rpare thee for this?
thy children haue forfaken me , and
(vvorne by them that are no gods,
14. Becaufeye fpake fuch words , bc-
holdc, I will put my word into thy
mouth, like a fire, and this people
shall be Ai vvod, and it shal deuourc
them. 3a4'»5
^.1 3. For from the lead of them, cucn
tothcgreacelt ofthem, cuery one is
giuen to couetoufnes : and from the
Prophet eucn to the Priclt,they shal
deale falftly. 4.5) j
7.4. Truft notinJying words, faying,
the Temple of the lordc, the Temple
ofthelord:this is the Temple of the
lord. 4.2 J
5. For if you amend and rcdreffe your
vvayes,andyourvvoikes, ifyou exe-
cute iudgemenc bctvvene a man and
his neighbour, &:c. J'>7.i
13, Therefore novve, becaufeye haue
done all thefe works, iaith the lord,
& Irofc vp early and fpake vnto you-
but when I fpake you woulde not
heare me , neither when I called
would ye anrvverc. " 2-5 n
I4> I will do vnto this houfe, vvher-
upponmy name is called , &c. as I
haue done vncoShilo. 2,5.11
a 2. For I fpake not vnto your fathers,
nor commaunded them , when I
brought them out of the landc of E-
gypt, concerning burnt oifrings and
facrifices. 4.10.15
J 3. But this thing commaunded I the,
fayinge, obey my voycc,ro I will be
your God, &c- 4.10.15,17
a7. Therefore shalr thou fpcake all
there vvordcs vnto them, but they
will nothtarc thcc : thoushalt «lfo
crie vnto them , but they Tvill not
anfvverethee. 3. 5. 11
28. This is a nation thathcarcth noc
the voice of the lorde their God,nor
receiuechdifcipline. 2 5. 11
5>.23. Let not the wife ma glory in hjs
wifdomjnor the ftrong mannc glory
in his ftrength, neither the rich man
giory in his riches. 3'«J-»
24. But let him that glorieth,giory in
this, that he vnderltandeth and kno-
wechme, for I am the lorde which
shevveth mercic , stnd iudgement,
and righceoufneltcin the earth, &c.
i.io.a
10.2. Be not afraidefor the figncsof
heaucn, chough thehcathe be afraid
offuch. 2.16.3
8. But altogether they dote and arc
foolishe , for the ftocke is a dodnne
ofvanity. 1.11.5
ii» The gods that hauc not made the
hcauens and the earth , shall perishe
from the earth,and from vnder theft
heauens, i.ij.i^
2 J. O lorde, I know that the way of
manisnot inhimfelfc , neither is it
inmannero vvalkeandtodirciShis
ftcps. 2.16.6
24. O lorde correfi me , but with
iudgemenc, not in thine anger, lealt
thou bring me to nothinge. 3.4.32
11. 7. For I haue protelted vnto your
fathers , when I brought them vp,
out ofthelande of Egypt , vnto this
day,rifing early, Sfprotelling, faying:
obeymyvoyce. 3. 20. 7.& 4.10. 17
8. Neuerthelcfl'c they woulde not o-
bey, nnr encline their care, &c.
there fore I will bring vpon them all
the wordes of this couenant, which
Icommaundethemtodo, &c. 3.20
7
11. Beholdcjlvvillbringc a plague a-
mongc them , which they shall noc
be able toefcapc, and though thty
crie vntome,T will not heare them.
3.20.7
i5>. Let vs deftroy the tree with the
frutc thcrcof,and cut him out of the
iandoftheliuingj&c. 4-i7i5
^i.l6. And
The Table.
I2.?<f» And if they will learnc the
vvaics of my people , to fvveare by
myname, chelorde liuech, as rhcy
taught my people to Ivvcare by Ba-
al,&c. j.8.25
14. 7. OlorJe, though oiw iniquities
teliificagjinftvs , deale with vs jc-
cording CO thy nanic;foi" our rebelli-
ons arc many; we fiuned againfl thee
3,20.8
14. The Prophetes prophecy lyes in
njy name, Ihauc not Tent tht-ni, nei-
ther did Icomauiid them, Sec. 4. 9. J
15. «. Though Moks & bamuel ftiode
before me,yec mine aftcdion couldc
not be toward this people: ca(t the
out of my (ightjand let them depart.
3.ao.2j
17.1. The finnc of ludah is vvrytten
vvJth a pen of iro & with the po;nc
of a Didmonde,and graueo vpon tiie
table of your hart , and vppon the
homes otyouraltars. i-r-^9
5. Thus iayth the lorde,curred be the
man that trultech in manne, and ma-
kethfieshhis arme, and withdraw-
eta his h^rt from the lorde. 2.2 .10
5. The hart is deceirfuil at d wicked
abouc all things, who can know it?
a;. Take hedctoyour roidcs,& bcare
no burden on the Sabbath day , nor
bringe it in by the gates of Ici-ufa-
1cm. 2.8.29
21. Neither cary forth burdens out of
yourhoufes on the Sabbath day:nei-
therdoyou any vvorkejbutfandific
the Sabbath, &c. a. 8.25
27. But if you will not heare tr.c to
iani^ifie the Sabbath day, and not to
beare a burden , nor to go through
the gates,&c. 2.8.29
■ 8.8. But if this nation, againftx'vhom
l^auc pronounced, turnefrom their
vvickedneffe, I will repent of the
plague that I thought to bringvpon
them. 1. 17. 11
18. Comeandletvs imagine fomedc-
uifcagainft Icremias : forthelavve
shall not perish from thePrieft, nor
counfci from the vvifcinor the word
from che prophet. 4'9'S
10.2. T lit Phaflur (mote lercmiah the
Prophet, and put him in the itockcs,
that were in the hie gate of Benia-
min, which was by the houlcof the
lord. ^9-^
ai.i2. Execute iudgementinthemor-
ninge,and dehuer the oppreffed out
of the handc of the oppreiibur,& c.4
20.9
22. J. Execute ye iudgementand righ-
tcoufneflcjand deliucr chc oppreliied
from thf handc of the opprcflcr,&c,
4.20.«>
2}. I. Woe be vnco the paftors that
deiiroyand fcatter the shetpij cfmy
paMuri.\!a;.ch the lorde. 4.9. J
5 Beholde, chc daycs comCjfaytJi the
lorde, that I Will rajfe vnto Dauid a
righteous bramKhe,anJ a king shall
raigiie and profper , and shall exe-
cute iudgcment and iuftice in the
earth. 26,1
6, And this is the name vvhercby they
shall cull him, the lorde our rightc-
ouincs. I.I 3 p.Sc 3 11.8
i^. Hc^re not the vyordes of the pro-
pherci that prophecic vnto you and
teachyou vanity, &c. 4 5».»
24. Do nor 1 Hli heaucn & earthjfaith
the lord? 4.I.S
a8. The prophet that hath a dreame,
letre him tell a drcarnc , and he that
hath my vvGrdc,lecte him fpcake my
wordtaichfuHy, 48,3
34.7. And 1 will giuc them an hart to
knovvenie,that 4 am thclordc, and
they shall be my p-ople, and I will
be th,ir God, Jor they shall teturnc
vnto me vvich their whole hart 1 s
JO
15,11. And this whole lande shall be
delolate , and aftonished,and thcfc
nations shil I (eruc the king of Babell
feuenty vcares. 1.8.7
1 %. And when the feuentv yeares are
accomplished, I will vifite die king
of Babcli,and that nation, fay th the
lord, for thciriniquity,&c. 1.87
2^. For locjl begmnc to plague the
ciiy,vvhcre my name is called vpoo.
WW ii
me 1
and should yon go free?&c. 3.434
sy. 5. I haue made the earth, the man,
& the bea(t that are vpon the groud.
Sec. 4.Z3.27
6. But now I haue giue all thcfe 1 ands
vnto the hanie of Nabuchddonozor
the king of Babyion my reruant,&c,
4.10.17,28
7. And all nations shall fcrue hira,and
his ronne,& his fonnes forme, vntill
the very time of his land come alio,
&c, 4.20.37
8. And the nation & kingdom which
will not fcrue the fame Nabuchado-
nozorkingc of Babell, and that will
not put thcjr neck vndc^- the yoke of
thek!ngofBabeli,&c/ 420,27
p. 'I hcrfore heare not your prophets,
nor your fo(>thrayers,nor your drea-
mers,nor your inchaunrers, nor your
forcercrs which fay vnto you thus,
yeshallnoc fcrue thekingof Babel,
ace ^ 4.9. J
14. Therefore heare not the words of
the prophctes that fpeake vnto you,
fayinge,ye shall not feruc the king of
Babeil,&c. 4-if')
1 7, Heare them not .but ferue the king
ofBabcll, that ye may hue, &c. 4.20
28
2 «?.7. And feeke the profpcrity of the
Citie, whether 1 haue caufed you
to be caned away captiucs , and
pray vnto the lordc for it, At, &c,4
20.28
ji.iS. Ihauc heard Ephraimlamedng
thus, thouhaft«corrcaedme, and!
was chaltifedas an vntamed calfc:
conucrt thou me and 1 shall be con •
ucrtcd;for thou art the lord my God
2.J.S.& 2.5. 8. & 3.24 I 5
ly Surely after that I couertcd,! re-
pented, and after that I vvas in/tru-
^cd,I fmotc vppon my thigh,&c.2. ?
51. Beholdc, thedaics come, faith the
lord, that Iwillm.ikea ncweco-
uenau t with the houfe of liraeli, &
with the houfeof iudah. 2.11.7.& j
4.29
3t. Not according to the couenaunc
that I made with their fiithfrs,yvhe
I tooke them by the hande,to bring
them out of the landc of fcgypt, the
which my couenanc they brake, &c.
2.$.p.s'yt 2.11.7
3 J . After thofe daies faith the lordc,I
will put mylavve in their inwarde
partrs,andvvriteit in their hartcs,&
vviil be their God,& they shalbe my
people. 2.8.14 & J. ao4j
34. For i vvill forgiue their iniquity,
and vvill remember their finncs no
mors. 3.4.25>'8c 3.20.45
35. Thus faith the lord, which giucth
the Sunne for a light to the day, and
the couries of thcMoone and of the
Starres,for alight to the night, &c,
4. 17.17
J 1. 1 <J. Now when I haddc deliuercd
the buoke of the profeffion vnto Ba-
ruch , the fonne of Neriah , I prayed
vnto the lord, faying. 3 . 2«. 1 5
18. Thou sbevvett mercy vnto thou-
iandcs , and recompencert theini.
quity of the fathers into rhcbofome
of their children after thc,&c.2 S.ip
2j. But they obeyed not thy voice,
neither walked in thy law : alt that
thoucoiTimaundelttiiemtodo, thty
haue not done , therefore thou hall
caufed this whole piagc to come v-
pon them,&c. 2.5 n
3^. And 1 will geue them one hart Sc
one vvay,that they may fcare roe for
euer , for the vvei th of chcc , and of
their children after them, &c. 2 ? 8
33.8. And I will tlcnfc them from all
-their iniquity, whereby they haue
finned againitme:vea,l vvdlpardon
al their iniquities,vvherby they haue
finnedagainft mcj&c.j.iO 45. & 4.1
20
t€. And in thole daycs shall Tuda be
faued,& lerufalem shal dwell fafely,
& he that shall call her, is the lordc
ourrightequfneSj&c. ''^3^
42 2. Heare our prayer, webefeeche
thee, and pray for vs vnto the lordc
thy God, &c. 3.20.14
5>. Thus (ayth the lord God of Ifraell,
vnto whomcyc teai wetopr^fent
your
The Tabic.
your prayers before him , &c. 3.20
14
43.10. Curfcd be he that doth the
vvorkc of the lord ntgligciuly, &C.4
20.6
50.20. In thofcdaics, 5f at that time,
fiyth the lord,che iniquity of Ifrael,
shalbc fought for , and there shalbc
none ; and the finnes of Iuda,& they
shall not bcfoundc,&c. h^^9
a 3. Howe is the hammer ofthe whole
world, dcltroyed & broken? how is
Babcll become defoUtc amonge the
nations, &c. --44
> 5 The lord hath opened his trcafure,
& hath biouehtthe weapons of his
Wrath, for tnisis the r O'^V.e of the
lord God of holtes, in the lad of the
Chaldeans, &c. 1.18.1
LAMENTATIONS.
f.t. /\ Lfo when r crie and shout, he
ALto wl
shut
itteth out my pr^iyer, &c.
J ao.i 6
38. Out of the mouth of the moft
high proccedcth not cuill and good^
1.17,8
4.XO. The brcth of our noflrels , the
Annointed of the lord was taken in
their nets, of whome w^e laid, vnder
his shadovvew^eshalbepreferucda-
liuc among the heathen, &c. 2.6. j
fcZECHIEL.
1. 20.^ jf rHether their fpirit led tiiem,
' * they wrent, and thither did
the fpirit ofthewheles lead them.&
the vvhceles were lifted vpbefjdcs
them , for the fpirite of the bcaftes,
&c. 4 J^. »2
J.J. Sonne of man, I fende thee to the
children of Iirael,to a rebellious na-
tio that hath rebelled againft me:for
they and their fathers hauc rebelled
againft me ; eucn vnto this very day.
9.241?
4 They are impudent children , and
ftitfe hartcd ; Idofende thee vnto
rhem,&c. j.24,1}
^,17. Sonne of man, I haue made thee
a watchman vntothehoulcof Ifra-
cll : therefore heare the word at my
mouth , & glue them Yvarning from
me&c. 4.?.}
18. Thefamcvvickedmanshaldiein
hisiniquitie : but liis blood will I
rcquireat thine hand,&c.4.2. J.&4
j.i6. Calamitic shall come vppon ca-
lamity, andrumor shalbe vpp(/n ru-
mor:then shall they leekeavifion of
the prophet : but the lavve shall pe-
rish fro the prielijand councel from
thcauncjent,&c. 1.18.3.& 4 .9.(J
lO 4. Then the glory of the lord went
vp from the Cherub, and llode ouer
thedore Gfthehoufe;5iCC. 4'iJ
5. And the founde of the cherubins
winges washearde intochs outer
court, &c. 1.14.S
11.15). Andlvvilgiue themone hart,
arid 1 will put a ncwe fpiiit within
their boweli-. Si I vviltake the ftony
hart outofthcirbodies,& vvilgiuc
them anheart ot fleshe, &c. i.x j. iQ
& 2.j.^.& 2.5.5.& 3.24.1
20. That they may vvalke in my fta-
tutes and kepe my iudgtmentes,an<i
execute them; and they shalbe my
people, and I will be their God, &c.
2.5.J
1 2.3. They are a rebellious houfe,&c.
3.24.13
I J. My net alfovvill Ifpreadvppon
him , and he shalbe taken in my net,
and 1 vvil bring him to Babel, to th«
landc of the Chaldeans, yet shall he
not fee itjthough he shall die there,
Src. 2.4.4
13.5). They shall not be in the afTemr
bly ofmy people, neither shall they
be wrytten in the vvritinge of the
houfeof irraell,&c. i.2j\.$ Sc 4 iJf,
14, j>.. And if the prophet be decciuctl
when he hath fpoken a thing , 1 the
lordehaue decciued that prophet,
&c. i.iS.i.
14. Though thefe three mcnnc Noah,
Danicll,and lob, were among them,
they shoulde.dehuer but their ovvne
foulcsby their righteowfae0e,&c.3
iO.»J
16.20, Moreouer thou haft taken thy
fonnesaiid thy daughters, whomo
V V V V iij
The Table.
thou haft borne vnto me, andthefe
hart thou racrificedvnrochem,to be
dcuourcd,&c. 2.a.ii & 4.i<J.i4
tj-zo. And 1 will fpri^arl my net vpon
him,& he shalbe takcrt in my net,& I
Tvil bring him to Babcll, and vvi! en-
ter into judgement vvich him, thcr-
fore his treipas , that he hath com-
mitted agaimlmcj&c. i.4«4
18.4. The ioulc that finncthshdldic,
&c. j.8.4,& 3.4.2JJ
5>. He that hath walked in my ftatutes,
and hath kept my iuogementes to
dealctrtiely, he is lull.he shal furcly
liuc,rayth:helord God,&c. 3.17.1 y
20, The fame fot'Ie which finneth
shal die: the fo«inc sha! nor beare the
iniqiiity of the father , neither shal]
the fatherbearc the iniquity of the
fonne,&c. 2.8.5>.&2.S.i9.& «.8.?o
& 28 55> & 5.3'«4
ai. Butifthevvicked vvil returncfro
all his finneSjthathchath comitted,
andkepeallmy Itatuccs.and do that
which islnwfulland righc,he shall
furcly liuc and not die. j . <. 14 & 3.4
18. & ?.i7.»5
a J Haiiclany define that the wicked
*hould diCjfayth the Inrde God ? or
shall he not liuc, if he returns from
his waves?
4 1.25
341 But if the righteous rcturnc from
his righceouihes , 5c comit iniquity,
and do according to al tl-.e abhomt-
«ations, that the vvi eked roan doth,
&c. ?-4i9 & 3I4.50
27. Aga!nc,vvhe thcvvirked turneth
away from his wickcdneiTc that he
hath committed, Sc doth that which
is law^full and righr.he ihall fauc his
foulealiue,&c.
3.429
ji. Caftaway from youal yourtraf-
greffions, whereby you hauetranr-
grefied,5c make you a new hart, and
anewfpirit.&c. 3?-^
J 2. For I defire not the death of him
that dieth,rayrh the lord God: caufe
therefore one an other to returne,&
liueye. 4 ••*5
ip.i2. And theealt windc dried vp
herfi:ucc,&c. i.i<J.7
ao.i I. And Igaue them my fUt«tej,&
declared my iudgementes vnto the,
vvhichifaniannedojheshalUiueih
thcm,&c. 3''i7-?
12. Moreouer I gaue the alfomy fab-
bathes , to be H fjgne betvvene me
& them, that rhey might know that
I am the lor dc that faniaifieth them,
&c. 2.8.2^
42. And ye shall knowc that I am the
lordjwhe I shiil bring you into the
landeoflfraell, into thelande, &c.
3.13.1
43. And tncreshal you rcmeber vcur
vvayes,andall your workes wHenn
yehatjcbiri defiled, 5cc. J.' 3'*
22.8. Thou haft dcfpifcd my holy
thingcs , and haft polluted my Sab-
bathes. 2.8 2p
23. Thercisa confpiracy of her Pro«
phetcs in the muldcs thereof like
a raannge Lyon,raucninge the pray:
theyhaue dcuoured roviIc$,&c.4.5>.3
26. HerPriellcs haue broken my lavv^
and haue defiled mine holy thinges,
they haue put no diftercce betwenc
the hoiy,and propiianc,&c. 4.5). \
25 = 37. And! aueallocaufed their fon$,
whnme they bare vnto me, topafle
by thefirc to be th<«ir meat. 4.15,24
J 8. Tl>ey haue defiled my far.dtiary in
the fame <^a^^ fi: haue prof haned my
Sabbathes. 2.8.29
28. 10. Thou fhalt die the death r;f the
vncircuciredjbytbe hands of itraun-
gcrj : forlbauefpokcnit^Cayth the
Lord God. 2.10.18
ip 4. Bur I will put hookcs in thy
chawes,anJ Iwillcaulethefishe 6f
thy riuers to fticke vnto thy fcalcs,
&C. I.I7.II
1 9. Beholdc, I vvil! glue the land e of
Egypt vnto Nebuchadnexar the
king ofBabell, and he shall take her
multitude, and fpoyle her fpoylc , &
take her pray , & it shall be the wa-
ges for his atmy. 4. 20 2tf
20. Ihauegiuen him thelandofEgipt
for his labour, that he ferued agaynft
it, becaufcihey wrought for me. 4
20.26
31.18. Thou
The Tabic.
)mS. Thou shalrflepe inthemiddelt
, ot the vncircumcifcd , with them
that be flaine by the fvvord : this is
Pharao, and all his multitude, &c.
l.IO.tS
33.8. He shall dy for his iniquitie,but
his blood will I requicr ac thy hand,
II. I defirc not the death of the wic-
ked,but that the wicked turnc from
his vva-y andliue,&c. j*24 1$
14. If he returncfromhis{inne,anddo
that which is lawful! and right,&c.
3.17. ij
34.4. But with crueltie and with ri-
gour haue yeruled thcm,&c.4.ii.i4
7 J. And I will fet vpa sheperdouer
them, and he shall feede them , cuen
my feruaunt Dauid. he shall fcede
them,&heshalbctheirsheperd.2,6,3
^6. XI. But I fauoured mine holy name
which chehoufe of IfracU had pol-
luted among the heathen whether
they vvcnt,&c. 5'4-?o
ii, I do not this foryour fakes , O
houfc of Ifraell , but for mine holy
names fake, which ye polluted amog
the heathen, &c. 3.12. j.& 3.»5.»
^5. Then willlpoure cleane water
vppon you , and ye shalbe cleane,
yea, from all your filthynes,and from
all your ydoies will I cleanfeyou,
&c. 3-1. J
atf. Anevvc hart vvillIgcueyou,and
a nerve fpirit will I put within
you, and I will take away the ftony
hart out of your body,and will giuc
you a hart offleshe. 2.3.6. & a 5.8.5c
} 24,t.& 3.24-I5
27, Andl will put my fpirit within
yours,and caufe you to walkc in my
ftitutes, and ye shall kepe my iudge-
mcnts and do them. I.}.lo.&2•^5
|i. Be it knowen vntoyou, that I
do not this for your lakes, faith the
Jorde God : therefore O ye houfc
of Ifraeli , be ashamed and con-
fijunded foryour ownc wayeS. 3.4.3
& 5.12. J. & j.i S»
|7»4- Againe he faid vntomc, pro-
phecie vpou cheii; bones and fay vnco
them , O ye dry bones, heart the
word of thelorde. 2. 10. 21
a 5. And my feruaunt Dauid shalbe
their prince for euer. 2,6.3
2 5. Moreouer , 1 will make a coue-
naunt of peace with chcm ; it shalbe
an euerlailing couenautvviththem»
&c. 2.5.3
4$.2i. And the rcfiduc shalbe for the
prince on the one fide and on the
other of the oblation of the fan-
ftuarie , and of the pofl'cflion of the
citie,&c. 4'2»3
35. And the name of the citie from
that day shalbe, The lordc is there.
1.13.4
DANIEL
a.2i."LJEtakcthavvaykings:& fctteth
vp kings, &c- 4.20.2^
37. Thou art a king of allkmgs : for
the God of heauen hath geuen thee
a kingdome , power , and ftrcngth,
andglorie. 4.20.25
44. And in the dayes of thefe kings,
shall the God of heauen fet vp a
kingdome, which shall neuer be dc-
flroyed ; and this kingdome shall not
be geuen to an other people , but
shall breake and deftroy all thefe
kingdomes , and it shall Hand for
euer,&c. *'»5 ?
4.24. VVherfore, O king,let my coflfell
be acceptable vnto thee, and breake
of thy finncs by righteoufnedc , an J
thine iniquities by mercie towards
thepoore,&:c. 3.4.J1.& 3.4. jtf
5.18. The molt high God gaue vnto
Ncbuchatlnezer thy Father a king-
dome , and maieflie , and honor, and
glory, &c. 4.20.2 <f
6, 22. And vnto thee , O king , I haue
done no hurt, 3cc. 4.20.3 a
7.4. The firft was as a Lion , and had
egles winges : I beheld , till the
winges therof were plucked of,&c«
1.S.7
10, And ten thoufand thoufandcs ftode
before him-, the iudgement vvasfee
andthebookesopened.i.i4.5.& 1.14
8.& 3.2.41
JJ, And shall fpeake vvordcs againft
WW lijj
illC
the moft highc, and shall cofume the
fainftes of the molt highe,and thiiike
that he may chaimge times , and
Lavvcs,&c. 4 7. a J
5,5. We haue finned , .indhaue com-
mitted iniquicie , and haue done
wickedly, yea wc haue rebelled, and
haue departed from chy preceptes,
«nd i'Vom thy iudgementF. 3 4'^
7. O Lorde,r!ght£ou(helI"e belongcth
vnco thee , and vnto vs open shame,
&c. 4.20.1^
10. For we haue not obeyed thcvoicc
of the lordc our God , to vvalke itl
his vvaycs, which he had Icyed be-
fore vs , by the miniftcric of his fer-
uaunts the Prophets. 1.5. 11
l8t For we do not prcfent our fiippb-
cations before thee for our ovvnc
righteoufncSjbut for thy great tedrc
mercies. 3.10.8 & 3.20'»4
14. Seuenty vvekes are determined
vpon thy people, and vppon thy holy
citie,to finish thy wickednes.and to
feale vp thy finnes , and to reconcile
thyiniquitie, and to bring ineucrla-
ftingrightcoufnefTcj &c. 1.7.2 & J
^ 5.1.8c 2.15.6
27. And he shall confirmc the couc-
nauntvvith many for onevveke:and
in the middcs of the v veke , he shall
caufe the oblation and iacrifice to
oeafctand forth; oner (preadingof
the abominations , he shall leaue it
defolate^&c. 4.2.12
10.13 But the prince of the kingdom
of Periia yvithilodeme,&c. i .14.7
lO. Butnovvcl will returne to fight
with the Prince, of Per(ia,&c 1.14 7
1 2.1. And at that time shall Michadl
iland vp,the great Prince, which
ftadethfor the childre of the people,
and there shalbe a time of trouble,
&C. I.I4.7.& I.I4.«.(5C 2.IO.II
t. And many of them that fltpc in
theduft of the earth, shall awake,
fome to euerlafting life , andfofne fco
shame and perpetual] contempt. 3
>5.7
5. And chey that be wife , shall shine
as the bnghcnes of the firmament:
and they that turne many to n'ghte^
oufneHe, shall shine as the flarres,
for euerand euer. 3.25.10
OS E A;
I.I I . "THcn shall the childre of Iudah»
and the children of Ifraell be
gathered together, & appoint them-
ie'ucs one head, and they shall come
vp oat oftheljnd,&c. 2.6.5
a 5. For their mother hath plaidc the
hariut;she that to^eaui-d tliem.hath
tlone «hamift:l!y : tor she fajdjlwiir
go-ifiermy lcucrs,&c. 2.8. 1 8
tS. And in that day I will make a
coiicnaut i'ot them, with tfie vviide
bealtes ,and vvich the t'ulcsof the
hcaue,and viriih them that crecpcrh
vpot) thr earth, &c. 4120
15. And I will marry thee vnto me
for euer : yea I rvill marry thee vnto
me in ns^ntcoufneffe , and in iudgc-
menc,& in mcrcy_and in compalTian,
l-i^ 6.8c 4.1.20
2 J. And Iv;.'ili haue m;rcje vpon her,
that vva.s not j^.uicd , and 1 will lay
to tliem which were not my people,
ihouart my people: and they shjll
fay, thou i>i I my God. }.i4.d
8.y. Aftervvard shall the children of
Ifraell coiiUcrt,and fceke ihelorde
their God, and Dauid theirking,and
shall teare the lord , & hisgoodnelTc
in the iacterdaves. 2 6. 3.& J.i-^J
511. tphiaimisopprcfrcd,and broken
in iu'lgempnt , becaufe he willingly
walked dfter the commauhdc menr.
4 20.3*
I 5. I will gOjind rcturqe to my place,
till they acknowledge their taulr,
and ftckeme,&c. i-S-if
(J.I, Come,& let vs returne to the lord:
for he hath rpoiled,and hevvill hcale
vs : he hath wounded vs,and hevvill
binde vs vp. 3 J *
7.S Ephraimisasacakeon the hearth
notturhtd. 3 4»J 5
8.4 They haue fetvp a king , but not
byme,&c. 1.1 S.4
$. 8 The watchman of Fphraim , should
be in with my God.biit that prophet
is the fnare of a fouler in all his
vvaycs.
The Tabic.
vvayes, and hatred in the houfe of her any more. 4>(>i7
his God. 4 5). J AMOS,
IJ.5. Yca,thclorde GodofhofteSjthe i.a. nTHclmde shall roarc from xion.
lord himfelfeishis memorial!. i.i 3. lo
1 5.. 1 1. Igauecheeaking in mine anger,
and 1 tooke him away in my wrath.
i.i3.4.& 4.20.25
I a. The iniquitieof Ephraimis bound
vp,and hisdnneis hid. ^•A'^9
14. Ivvill redecmcthe fromthcpovvcr
of the graue : I will deliuer them
from death -. O Death , I will be thy
death : O graue, I wjU be thy dcftru*
ftiotij&c. 3.25.10.
14. i. Take away all iniquitie , andre-
ceaue vj gracioufly:fovvill vvereder
thecaluesofour lippes. ^-^.lo.Si $
20.28.& 4.18.17
Afshur shall not faue vs, neither
will vve ride vpon horfcs: neither
will vve fay any more to the vvorke
I
and vtterhjs voice from Icru-
falem.&c. 28.1;
3.6. Or shall there be euill in a citie,
and the lorde hath not done it? 1.17
8& .i8.|
4.7. And alfo I haue vvithbouldta
the raine from y ou,vvhen there were
yet three monches to the harueft,
and I ciufed it ro raine vppon one
citie, and h jue not caufed it to rain i
vppon an othei,&c. 3.22.10
5. 1 4. Seeke good and not euell,thar ye
mayliue,&c. 2.$.io
6.1. Wo to them that arc at eafein
Zion,&c. l-^9-9
4. They lie vppon beddes of yuorie,
and llrecch ihemfelucs vppon their
beddes, &c. 3.15) 9
of our handes, ye arc our gods : for 8. 11. Beholde, thcdaycs come, faycth
in the* , the fathcrlefTc findeth mcr
cy. 1.11.4
4. I will heale their rebellion :I will
loue them freely : for mine anger is
turned away from them. 3. 14. (J
I O H L.
a. 1 2a 'T'7rnc you vntome,vvith all
yourharte,& with f-iftirig,
and with weping , and with mour-
ning. a.5.8,& 3 3.17
I J. And rent your harte,aiid not your
clothes, &c.
the lords Gnd , that I will fend a fa-
mine in the land , not a famine of
bread, norathirlt for water , but of
hearing of the word of the iorde.
3.22.10
5),if.Inthat day will I raifevp the Ta-
bernacle of Dauid.thar is fallc down,
and clofe vp the breaches thereof, &
I will raife vp his ruines , and I will
buildicas in thedayes ofoldc. 2.^.3
A B D I ■ A S.
15 Elowe the trumpet in Zion , fan
6t)fieafcaU,callafolemne alTemblie.
4.I2-I4& 4.1a 17
a8. And afterward , will I poure out
my fpirit vppon all fleshe:and your
fonnesjlnd your daughters shal pro-
phccie ; your olde men shall dreame
dreames , and youryonge men shall
feeviiitions.a.i5.2.& 3.1.2.& 4.<8.4
32, But vvhofoeuer shall call vppon
the name of the lorde , shalbe faued;
for in mount Zion , and in lerufalem
shalbe deliucrance, &c. i.i^.ij.Sc
I.IJ.20.& 3-20.2 & 5.20.14.&4.1. j
& 4.1-4
|.?7, Then shall lerufalem bee holy,
j8( there shall no Itragers go rhoro v v
3. 3,i(f.& 4.12.19 ^V^t vppon mount Zion, shalbe de-
liueraunce,&c. 4.MJ
I O N A S.
1.4 "D Vt the lorde fcnt out a great
vvindc into the fca,and there
was a mighty tempc/l in the fea,&c.
t.16.7
2.j^. But Ivvill facrificevntothee,with
the voice of thankes geuing,and will
pay that I haue vowed ; faluation is
of the lorde. 3.20.28
3.4, Yet forty dayes , and Niniueth
shalbe ouerthrowcn. 1.17.13
5. So the people of Niniueth beleued
God, and proclaimed a faft, and put
on fackcloth, from the greateft of
thcajjcuentothelcit oftbem. 3.34
&4<i2.i7
tOk And God fawe their vvorkes that
ihey turned from their cuill wayes:
and God repented of the euill that
he had (aid , that he would do vnto
them^andhedid itnot. 1.17. 14
MI CHE AS.
S.ij, TpHe breaker vp shall come vp
before thc:they shall brcake
out and palTc by the gate , and go out
by it , and the lorde shalbe vppon
their headcs. i.6,i
3.(5. Therefore night shalbe vnto you
for a viiion , and darkenes shalbe
vnto you for a diuination , and the
funne shall go dovvne ouer the pro-
phets, and the day shalbe darkeoucr
them. 4-9^
r ». And thou Bethclcm Ephrarah, arc
little to be amog fo many thoufandes
of ludah , yec out of thee shall he
come forth vnto me, that shalbe the
ruler in Ifraell ; vvhofc goings, &c
1.14.7
15, Tliine Idolcs alfo will I cut of,
and thy images out of the middes of
thee : and thou snalt no more vvor-
sbippe the vvorkc of thine handcs.
I. It. 4
J.$. I vvill beare the wrath of the
lorde , bccaufc I haue finned againft
him , vntill he pleademy cau{e,Scc.
J.4 5».
15>. He vvill fubdue our iniquities, and
call all thcirfinnes into the bottomc
olthefea. . iA-^9
HAB AC VC.
j.ia. A Rtnotthouof ouldc, olordc
my God mine holy onc?vve
shall not dy,o lorde, &c. 2.10.8
».j. Though it tarry,vvaitc:for it shall
furely come,& sh;ill not (lay. 3,1 .41
4. But the iull shall hue byhis faith.
?.!4.ii.& J.^B.J
xS. What profiteth the images ,. for
the maker thereof hath made it an
image? and a rcacher of lies, though
he thjt made it, truft therein, when
hemaketh dumeidols. 1.5.12. & j.n.J
40. But the lorde is in his holy Temple:
let all the earth kepefilcnccbefiore
him. 1.5.12.& 1. 10.3.^2.8.15
3.2. In wrath remember mercie. j.
4?»
3. God commeth from Tern an , &c.
1.13.27
2 3. Thou vventeft forth for the falua-
tion of thy people, euen for faluation
with thine annointed,&c. 2.6. j
SOPHONIAS.
1.5. A^d them that worshipp the
hofteofheauen vppon the
houfe toppes,& them that worship
and fvvcare by the lorde , and by
Malcham,&c. 2.8.25
3.1 1. For then I will take away out of
the middes of thee ,the thacreioic&
of thy pride, and thou shalt no mor«
be proud of mine holy mountaine.
3.12.^
M A G G E V S.
2.12. A Skenovve the priefts concer-
ning the lav ve, and fay, if
one beare holie fleshe in the ikirt of
his garment, &c. 3.14 7
ZACHARIAS.
1.3. TV^rne ye vnto me , fayeth th?
lord of hoftes,& I vvill rurnc
vncoyou,&c. 2. 5. 9. & 3.24,15
2.4. And an other angell went out to
meetehim,and faid vntohim.runne,
fpeakc to thisyonge man, and fay,
lerufalcm shalbe inhabited without
vvalles , for the multitude ofmen &
cattell that are therein. H3.10
8. Forhcchat touchethyou,toucheth
the apple of my eye. i.i3.io.&i.i7,<5
II. And many nations shalbe ioincd to
the lorde in that day , and shalbe my
people : and I will dwell in tlv
. middes of thee, & thou shalt know
that the lorde of hoftes hath fentme
vnto thee. 1.13.10
x». And the lorde shall inherit ludah
his portion in the holy lande,and
shall choG lerufalemagaine. 3.21.5
j.io In that day, layeth thelordeof
hoftes , shall ye call cucry man bis
neighbour vnder thcvine,and vnder
the fi 2 tree.
3.13.4
7.1 J. Therefore it is come to palTc,
that as hee cried and they vvoiil4
not hearc,fo they cried,and I vvQul'd
noi
The Tabic.
not hearCjfayeth the lord e of holt cs. knowledge, and tViey should fcke
3. J. 14 ihcUvvcat his moutli, for he is the
5,9. Rcfoicc greadie,o daughter Sion: mcflengcr of thelordcof hodcs 4.8
shoutforioy, o daughter Icrufalem: i.& 4. 8. 6. & 4.5).!
bcholde , thy king commeth vnto 8. Butye arcgonc out oFrhe way : ye
thee : he is iuft and faucd, poore,&c. haue caufcd many to fall by the law
1.6.1.6c » «7.<5
II. Thou alfoshalt be faucd, through
the blood of the couenaunt I haue
loofcd thy prifoncrs out of the pit
wherein was no vvatei. 2.16.9
12.4. In than day I will fmice, faith
the lorde , eucry horfe with ftonish-
mcnt , and his rider with madnert'c,
&c. 4.5>.5
13 9. They shall call on my name , and
1 will heare them ; I will fay, it is
my people . and they shall fav , the
lorde IS my God. -»ii<»> . 3.20.13
14.9. And the lorde shalbe king ouer
all the earth : in that dayshalbeone
lord, and his name shnlbe one. 1.12.3
M ALACH 1 AS.
1.3. WV'ASnot tfau Iac<;bs brother?
faith the lorde. 55 c. 3. 21. (J
3. Yecllouedlacobjand J hated Efau,
dec. 3.21.5
6. Afonnehonorethhis Father, and a
ferunuftt his mailttr. If then I be a
father, vvhcreisminchonor , and if
I be a roaifter , where is my fca-e,
&c. 2.8.14 & 3-2 i6 ^ 3 <»,j
II. For from the riling of the Sonne,
vnto the going downe of the Oimc,
my name is great among the glcilcs.
And in euery place infence shalbc
ye haue broken the couenaunt of
Leui,&c. 4 7.30
3 -I . And the lord whom ye feke, shall
fpedely come tohisTemplc:cueu the
meflengcr of the couenaunt whonn
yedcfire,&c. i.i 3.1 o.& 1.14.9
17. 1 vvillfparethe,as amafpareth his
own fonne that ieruethhira. 3.19.J
4.1, For bchould.the day cometh thar
shall burne as an ouen:and all the
proude.yea,& all that do wickedly,
shall be as Aubble, and the day that
commeth shall burne them vp,&c,
3.24.11
2. But vnto you thatfeare my name,
shall the funne of righteoufnelfe,
&C. 2.6.1. Si 3.24.I«
4. Remember the lavvc «9f Mofes my
feruaunt , which I commaunded
vnto himinHorebforall ifracll,&c.
5. Behould , I will fend you Eliah the
prophet before the commingofthc
great and fcarefuU day of thclordp.
2.95
6. And he sh all tiirne the harte of the
fathers to their children, and the hart
of the children to their Fathers, &c*
4 i.<J
TOBIAS.
offered vnto my name: and a pure 3.15. A^*^ R3p').iell was fent to
offering, &c. 4.18.4 & 4 i.S.i<J hcalc chem both,&c.k.i4, 8
4. And ycshallknovve,thacIhauc SAPIENT I A.
fent this commaunderoent vnto you, 14.1^. THusby proceffeof time this
that my couenaunt , which I made vvicked cultomcpreuailed,
with Lcui , might ftand , Ciieth the and was kept as a la we, and ydolcs
lorde of holies. 4.2.3.3:4 8,2 vvere worshipped by the comaun-
My couenaunt was with him of dement of tyrants. i.ii.S
life and peace ,and I gauehimfeare, ECCLESIASTIC VS.
and he flared me, and was afraid 15** 4* G^*^ made man from the bc-
beforcmyname. 4.2.J ginning , and left him in
The law oftruth was in bis mouth: the hand of his counfell , and gaue
and there was noiniquitie found in him his commaundemcnts and pre-
his lippes. 4.2.3.&4.8.3 ccptes. a. 15.18
For the Pricfts lippes should kepc 15. If thou wilt, then shah oblcrue
the rotnmanndemeBts , and teibfie
thy good vs'ill. a. i 5.18
%6, He hath fccvv-ater and fier before
thee, ftretch out thy had vnto which
thou wilt, 215.18
17. Before man is life and death: good
and fuu\ : what him liketh shalbe
gUTenhjjn. 2.15.8
id.14. Hfwillgeuc p'ace to all good
<lcedcs,& eucryont shili Hnd, accor-
ding 10 his works, .& alter rhcvnder
ftandmgof hispiJg/imjgc. 3.15.4
B A R V C H.
».l8. RVt thctoulc that is vexed for
thcgrcatncsoflmnc^andhe
that goeih crokcdly,and weake,and
the evts that fayle,and the hungry
foulc will geue thee praife & rlghtc-
oufncirej&c. 3 208
i^. For we do not require mtrcyni
thy fight , O lordc our God , for the
rishteoufnerte of our Fathers, or of
ourk'ngs, 3.10.8
ao. But becaufc thou haft fent out thy
• wraih and indignation vpon vs , as
thou haft fpoken by thy feruaunrs
- thcprophccsjuvc. J.J0.8
I. MACHABEES.
1.5^ ANd the Bo; kes of the lawe,
which thcv foimde » they
. hnxat in the fire ,and cut in pieces.
1.8. 5>
ir. MACHABEBS.
12.4 J. A NdhauMig made a gathering
through the companic,(cnt
to Icrufalem abour two thouiand
<tr*chnnes of liluer , 10 offer alinne
offering, &c. 3 5.8
15.39 iHhaue done well, and as the
ilorie required ,it is the thing that
1 defireJ : but if 1 haue fpoken llcn-
derlv and barely , it is tliat icould.
3.5.8
KlATTHEVVE.
I.J. A ^d S.jlomon bcgate Boox of
"^^ R:»chah, and Boox bcgJte
Obed of Ruth, Sc Obed bcgite lelTe.
2.13.3
t(f. And lacob bsgatelofeph thchuf.
band of Marie, of vvhoni vvas borne
lelus whtch is called Chnft. 2. ; 3. 3
1 dViC,
21. And she shall bring forth a Tonne,
and thou shalt call his name Icfus-.fi.r
he shall lauc his people from their
linnes. 2.6.1
23. Beholde , a virgine shalbe with
child, and shall bearea lbnne,«nd
they shall call his name cmmanuell,
which IS by interpretation , God
with vs. 2.1 2. 1
i,6. And thouBethlcmin the land of
luda , arc not the Icaft among the
Princes of luda : for out of thee shall
come the goucrnour chat shall feedc
my people Ifraell. -«'4-7
3.2. lobnlaid , Repent : for the king-
dome of heauenisac hand. 3.3.2.&
6, And they were baptixed of him in
loidacn, confe fling their finnes. 3 4
6.3c 4.1 5.5.& 4.1 6.24
II. In decdelbapuze youwith water
to amendcmeat of life,& c. 4. i f .6.5:
4.15.8 &■ 4.16.25
12. Which hathhislanneinhishand»
and will make deane his fioorc,and
gethcr his wheat into his garner,
but will burnevp the chafte with
vnquencheable lire. 3. 25 1 2.& 4^1. 1 1
& 4.1. 15
13. Then came lefiis from Galile to
lordanvnto lohn, tobebaptJxed of
bim. 4'i5'<5 & 4.16.27
15. Let be nowe : for thusitbecom-
methvs to fulfill all righteoufncfte.
So he fuftcred him. 2.16.5
16. And lohn (livyc the fpirit of God
defcending like a doue,and lighting
vpon him. 1. 1 1. 3. 2C4. 17. 21.& 4
151.20
17. And lo, a voice came from heaucn,
faying : this is my beloued foime , m
whom I am well plealed. 2.1 6. 11. Sc
& 5.z.52,& 3.8,i.& 3.24.5
4.0. And when he had fifted fortie
dayes and fortie nights, he was after-
ward hungrie. 4.12.20
5. Then came to him the rempter, and
faid , if thou bee the fonne of God,
comaundc that thete ftones be made
bread. 3.20.4^
4. Man shall not hue by bre^d ooely.
The Tabic.
but by euerie word that proccedcth
out of the mouth of God. 3.20.44.
10. Ihcn (aidlefus vnto him ,auoidc
fjthan: font IS rvritttn ,thou sh^lc
worship the Lorde thy God , and
hjmoncly shalt thou fervjc. i.ii.j.
11. Then tlie dcuill Icftc him;aiidbc-
h()ulde,tbe jingcli came, and mini-
ftred vnto him. 1.14.^.
17. From that time Icfus began to
prc^chc , and to fay, Amende your
liucs:ror thckmgcdome of hcauenis
at hande. i.51 s.& ?.3.a.& j. 3 ip.
15. Follow mc andlvviU make you
fishers of men. 4.16 51.
5 J. Bltdedarethc poorcin (pint, for
theirs is the kingdoms ot hcauen. 1.
4< BIcrtcd are they that mouriic, for
thevshalbc comforted. • J 8, p.
8. Blcftcd are the pure in heart: for they
shaJlfecGo.l. 3.25 6.
10. Bldiedarc they which ruffcrpcrfc-
cutio forrighteoufnes fake.for theirs
is the kingdume of hcauen. 3.8 7.
xa. Reioicc ^ndbe glad, forgre-c II
youre rcvvard* in hcauen, &c,j.r 8 1
1 J. Yc are the fait of the earth , &c,4.
j.j.Sc 4.S.14.& 4.8.4.
14. Yc arc the light of the worlde,
&c. 4.J.J.& 4,5.i4,& 4.8 4
15. NeJtherdoe men light a candcll Sc
put it vnder a bushell , but on a can-
delllickc, & it eeueth light vnto all
that are in the houfe. 1.11.14.
16. Let your lijjht fo shine before men
that thry may fee your good workcs
andglorifie your father which is in
heauen. j 16. j.
17. Thinkenot that I am come to dc-
fti oy the Lswe, or the prophets. I am
not come to deftroy them , but to
fulfill them. 2.7. 4.
i^. VVhofocuer therforc shall breake
one of thdelcalt commandenienrs
and teachciiien lo , hcshalbe called
the Itaft in the kingdomc of heauen
but wholoeuer shall obfcruc, 2ci..i.
8.59.
ai. Ye hauc heard, that it was faid vnto
them of theo]d« time , inou ihalt
not kiil :for whofocaer killeth, shall
be culpable ofiudgemcnt. 4.30.10.
11. But i fay vnto you , whofocaer is
ang! ic with his brother vnaduifedlie
shalbc culpable of iutig;:ncnt., &c,
a.J5.7.& 1839.
If. >^gree vvith thine aduerCaric
quicklie, whiles thou arcin the way
vvith him left, 5^c. • rS-J.
2<S. Verdic I fdy vnto thee, thon shale
not come out thence , till :hou hall
psysd the vttcrmofte farthing, j.j.
7.& j.ij.tf.
a8, VVhofocuer lokcth on a woman
to lult after her , bathe comuuttcd
adultetie with her allrcadie in his
harrc. ».8.7.
J 4. Swear* not jt all neither by heaue,
&c. 1 8.2^.&'4.( j.ia
39 But Ifay vnto you, rc-fift not euilL-
but whofociier shall fmite the ort
the right theke, time to him the
otheralfo. 4.20 19 & 4.20.20,
44. Loue your enemies biclTe the that
curfe youjocc. 1.8. j7 & 3,7.6 & 4,
Is rs
45. That ye may be the chil-ircnof
your father w hi che is tn he^ucn;ff:r
he maktth his funnc toariiecn the
euell,andon the go«.d,&r. j.jo.i 5.5c
3 24 16. & <.a5 9.
46. For if you lou-.- tliem vvhichcloue
you, what rtvvarde shall you h.me?
doc not the pubhcas cucn the fame?
a. 8., 7.
6, 2. Therfore when thou geucll thine
almes ,rhou shait not makea trum-
pet to be blovvcn before toce,as the
hypocrites do in the (ynagogucs , 6c
in the ftretes , to be prjifed of men.
VerJjc I fay vnto you, they hauc
their revvarde. 3-7.2.
6. But when ihou praieft , enterinto
^ thy chamber: and when rhouhafte
shut the doore . pr.iy to thy father
which isinfecrete, Sc". 3.2019,
7. Alio when ye j: ray, vfe no vaincrc-
pftitions as the heathen , for they
to be heard, for their much babling.
thinke 3.20.29.
$t Afier chisroaner therforc prayyc:
Our ftthcr which art in hcauen , ha-
lovvedbe chynaaie^&c. j. 30.6. 8c 3.
11. Geue vs this day our day lie bread
3.5.14.
12. Andforgeue vs our dct$,as vveal-
foforgeue our dectcrs.3.4.58.& 41. 23
ai. For where your trcdfure is , there
will your heart be alfo J.2.25.& j.
18 6.& 3.25.1
2 J. But if thine eye be vvickcd,theii all
thybodieshal be darke. VVherforc if
the light yvhich is in thee be darkcnes
how great is that darkenes? j. u^.
7.7. Aske,& It shaibc gcuen youMcckc
& ye shall finde : knocKc,and it shall
be opened vnto you. j.20.15.
11. If ye then vvhiche areeuell,can
geue to your chilrlrcn good giftes,
h'»vv muche more shall your father
which is in hciiue,g<'ue good things
to them that askeh;m ? 3.2036.
12. Iherfore, whaiibtucrye vvoidde
that men shouldedoc vnto you, euen
fo doe ye to the: For this is the law
and thcprophctes. 2.8.53.
15. Beware of falle prophets, whiche
come to you insiietpcs clothing, but
invvaidlie they are rauenmgc wulfcs
4 9-4-
8.4. Then lefus favd vnto him, fee thou
tell no man : butgoe, md shew thy
felfc vnto the pritil.aiui oftL-r the gift
that.Mofes c6maundcd,for a vvitnes
to them. 3-4-4'
fO. And when lefu.^ heard this , hce
merujyled,aiul fayd to them vvhiche
foilovvcd hiiii: verclie I fay vnto you
1 hauc not found fo great fay th cutn
inlfiael, 3-^«'3
n. M.mieshal come from the Ejft and
from thcVVeft,.ind shallfitc dovvne
with Abraham, and Ifaac and lacob
in tiiekingdon)cof hcauen- 2.io,2j.
& 4 16. J 3.
12. And the children of the kingdome
shalbe calf out inrovtter darkenes:
there shall be vvcping and gnafThing
of teeth. 3.25.12.
I 3. Th£ lefus fayd vnto the Ceturion,
gu thy vvaics,(^ as chouhafl bifleued.
5).t.
h
fo be It vnto thee. And his feruaunt
was healed the fame hourc. 3. 20.11, j
2^. Then his difciples came, & avvoke
him ,fayinge:mayflcr , faue vs vvc pc- ]
risht. 3.2. :i,
25;. Itfus the fonne ofGod,vvhat haue
vv e to doe with thee?art thou come
— "^ hcthtr to lormet vs before the time?
1.14. >^.
Andloc, they brought to nimal
man fickeof £!yepaliielyln|^ on abed
and lefi;s feeing tlicir f.iyih^ faid to
the fickf of the pilfit , fonne , bee of
good cofort: thy iii>i)es arc forgeutn
thee. 3.2 13.& 3 4.J5.& 3.20.«>.,
Ccrtainc of the icribes (aide vvuhj
in the felues , this nsan blafphemcth J
I.I ^.i»
4 Butvvhe Icfus favv their thoughts.
6ic. 1. 13. 12.
5. For whether is it caller to fay, Thy
finnts arcforgtuen thce,or lolay, A-
ril'cand vv.iike? .^. i«?.25;.
6. And that ye may know that the
funne of man hath authoritic to for-
geue iinncsin earth, ('then faidhcc
to the ^ckeof thcp»liie, jarifc, take
vp thv bed 6 go to thyhoufe.i.i 3.1 a
12. The vvht.kneedc notaphificion,
but they that are ficke. 2 12.4.
13. For I am not come to call the righ-
teous,butthe finners to repentance.
3 3.2o,& 3.12.7.(5: 3.M«5.
15. Can the children of the mariagc
chamber mourne , as long as the
bridcgrome,&c. 3.3.17.6; 4.IJ.I7.
>5. The touched he their eye,s,fayingc:
accordirgctoyour faith , beiivnco
you.3.2.43.& 3.4.22.& 5.2o.ii.&" 4.
1 9- 1 )(•
34. But the Pharifces laid , he cartcth
out dcuils, through the prince of dc-
uils. 3.3.22.
35, And Tefus went about all cities,
and towiieSjpreachino in their fina-
goguesjand preaching the Gofpel of
thekingdome,&c. 3.5). 2
10 I. Andhec calJcfi histwcluc dif-
ciples vnto him, and gaue the povver
agamllvnclean fpirits,6^c. 4'J 5«
5. Goeaotinco thevvayof thcgetiles
and int9
The Table.
& into the cities oF the Saroaritancs
enter ye not. 2.1 1 12.
8. Hcalc the ficke : clenfc the lepers:
raifc vp the dead,cafl out dcuils,4.p
I.I ).i }.
a8. And ycshalbc brought to the go-
uernors & kings for my fake,invvit-
ncflingc to them and to the genwirs
3.4.4.
ao. For it is notye that speakc,but the ,
fpirite ot your father tnat speakcth,
in you. 4.i5> 8.
a8. And fearc ye not them which kill
the hodic , but are not able to kill,
the CouIe:but rather feare him, which
is able to deftroybothfoule gcbodic
in hell. i.iS.».& j-aj.?.
a^. Are not two fparrovves fold for a
farthing , and one of them shall not
fall on the grounde without your fa-
ther? %.i6.i.8i i.i6.^.Si.i.i'j.6,
JO. Yca,&all the hearts of your head
are nombred. 1.16.2,
3 J. Fearc ye not therforc,ye are of more
value them many fparrovves. 1.17.^.
3 3. But vvhofocuer shall dcnie me be-
fore me, him will I alfo dcnic before
my father which is in hcaue.4.i.2^
II. TO. For this is he ofvvhome itis
vvritte:behould,I fendc my meflen-
ger before thy face,vvhich shal pre-
pare thy way before thee. 3.3.1 5>.
lU Among them which arc begotten
ofwome , arofe there not a greater
then Ihon Baptift: notvvirhltanding
hec thatis leaftin the kingdome of
heauen,is greater then he. 29.5.
13. For alltheProphetesandtheLavr
prophecied vnto Ihon. 2-11.5.10.
aj. And thou Capernaum, which art
lifted vpvntohcaue,shaltbe brought
down to hehfor ifthc great works,
which haue bin done in thee hadde
becne done among them of Sodome
tiieyhad remained to this day. 3. 24.15
35. At that time lefus anfvvered , and
faid : Igeucthee thankes ,0 father,
Lorde of hcauen and earth, becaufc
thou hait hid thefc things from the
vvife,& men of vnderftand nge , and
haft openedchcmvntobabvS. 3.2.J4
27. Neither knorvethanyman the fa-
ther,but the fonne, & he to vvhome
the fonne will reueale him. 4*8.5.
a8. Come vnto me all ye that be vvcary
and laden, and I will eafcyou. }. 3.20.
& 3.4. 3. & 3.12.7.& ?.i8.j>.
29. Take my yoke 00 you , and learnc
of me that lam mfcke and lovvliciti
heart& ye shall linde relle vnto your
_ foules. 3»'8 j»,
30. For my yoke is eafie,and my burdc
light. 4-»i>-?.
1 2.24. But when the Pharifcs hardit^
u-^ they faid, This man calteth the deuils
no othcrvvife out , but through
Beelzebub the prince ofdeuils. 3.3.3*
ai. Eueriefinrie&blasphemie shalbce
forgeue vnto men : but the blafphc-
mie againfl the holie gholt shall not
bcforgeu« vntomen.i.i 3.1 5. & 3.3.
21. &: 3 5 22.
32. And vvhofoeuer shall fpeakea
vvorde againftcthc fonne of man, it
shalbe forgeuen him: but vvhofoeuer
shall fpeake againfte the holie ghofte
it shall not bee forgeue him, neither
in this world , nor in the world to
come. ? 5-7.
41. The men of Niniue shall rife in
judgement , with this generation, 5c
shall condemne it;for they repented
at tl>e prcachinge of Ionas.&c.3.a4,
43. Novv when the vncleane fpirite-
is gone out of the man , he vvalketh
throughoutdryplaccsjieking rcft,&
findeth none. 1. 14.14. & 1. 14 ip.
I 3. 4. And as he fovvedjCome feedes fell
by the way fide , & the foules came
anddeuouredrhemvp. 3. 22. 10. &
4 14.11.&4.17 3j.
5. And fome fell vppon ftonie grounde
where they had not muche earth, &
anone they fpronge vp , becaufe they
had ni» depth of earth. 4.17.^3,
7. And fome fell among thornes,5c the
thornes Iprong vp, & choked them.
4.i7.?J.
5, He that hath ears to heare , let him
heare. 3»?-»?
li. Becaufe it is g^uen vnto you, c<»
The Table.
knovvcthe fecrctcsoftbe kinged ome
of heauen, but to them it is not geucn.
1.7. 5. &. 3. 14.13.
16. But blefTcd are your eyes , for they
fee:& yourcarcs , for they hcarca.
9.1.
ly.For verclie 1 Gy vnto you,thatmany
prophctcs and righteous menhaue
13. Eueryplant which mine hcauely
father hathe not planted , shall be
rotedTp. ».3.5).& j.2.»2.& 5.z).i.|c
?.24.<{.
14. Let them alonc:they bee the blinde
leaders of the blinde fk if the blindic
leade the blinde,both TialJ fall in the
ditchc. ?.i5>.ii.U 4 V'' »
defircd to fee tbofe things which 24 1 am not fet,but vnto the loft sbepe
ye fee and haue not fccne them , &c.
a. 11. (J,
24, Thekingedome of heauen is like
vnto a ma,vvhich fovvethgood (eeti
inhisficldc. 4.1.13.
ap, Buthc faid,nay:Ieft while ye go
about to gather the tares , ye pluck
vp alfovvJth them the wheat. 4.1 J.
11.
ji. The kingdomc of heauen ;s like
vntoagrauie of;Tiuftardfeed,vvhich
a man taketh & foweth in his heldc
4.i;?.54.
3}. An other pamblc fpake hccvnto
them,(ayinge: thckiPgdom ofheaus
is like vnto leaucn, which a woman
taketh and hidcth in three peckes
ofmcale,tillitbeall leaucncd. 4 i9>
34
of the houfe of Ifrael. a. 11. 11.
16.6. Takeheedc and beware of the
Icautn of the Pharifces, & Saduccs.
4.10.3^.
12. Then ynderftodc they that he had
nocfaJdthar they should be v\iarc of
the Icuenof bread c , but of the do-
ftrine ot the Pharifces , and Saduces.
4.10 »6,
16. Thou art Chriftthc fonne of the
liuingc God. 4.6.6.
17. Bkflcd art thou Simon thcJonnc
of lonasjfor fleshy blood h^th not
reueledit vnto thee, but my father
which IS in heauen. 2.3.15.& 3.>.4>
& 3.2.34
i». Andlfay alfo vnto thee that thou
art Peter , and vpon this rockl vvil
buyld my church. n.,6,^.k ^ 6.^,
55>. And the cnemie which fowtch i5>. And I vvilgeue vntothee,thckrye«
them,is the dcuill,&c. i.i4i5
47. The kingdome of heauen is like
vntoanet.thatv^'as caft into the fea
and gathered ofallkind.4.i.i3.&.4.
16 31.
14.25. And in the fourth watch of the
night , lefus went vnto them,vval-
kingon the fea. 4.17.29.
1 5,3, V Vhy dii ye alio tranfgrelfe the
conrmandementof God by your tra-
dition?
4.10.10.
4. For God hath comaunded,fayinge,
honor thy father and mother, and
he that curfeth father and mother, let
him die the death. 28.^6.
8. This people dravveth iieere vnto
.-^ mee with theire mouth, & honoreth
mee with their iippes , but their
hart is farre of from me. 3 . 20.31
5, But in vaine they worship mee,
ccachijngc for <ioftrines,mes precepts
4>io.i5*^ 4.io.»)>
of the kingdom of heauen: & what-
foeucrthou shalt binde vpon earth,,
shalbe bound inhcauen: and what,
foeuet tliou sliaitlofe on the earth
shalbe lofed in heauen. 3.4.1 z.&. 4.1.
2a.& 4.2.10.& 4.<J.4,& 4.I1J& 4.
12.4
23. Get thee bchindeme,S.{tan : thou
ait an offence vnto me, &c. 4.7.28.
24. If anie man will follow me, let
him forfake him felfe, & take vp hit
crofl['e,and follow me. 3.7.2 & 3.8.1
17. For the fonne of man shall come
in the gloric of his father , with his
angel.s:and thenshall be geue to eue-
ry man according to his deedes. 3.
J 8.1.
17.2. And was transfigured before
them:and his face did shine as the
fonne, St his cloches were as white
as the light. 4.i7.i7.
5, While he yet fpake , bchoulde,a
bright
ThcTal5lc7
bright cloudc shadowed them : and
behould, there cam« a voice out of
the cloudc, faying: tKiiismy vvcll-
bcloued fonne in whom I am well
pleared,heare him. 2 15.2. &). 1.32
&?.8 I.& J.10.48.&4.8 I.&4-8.7
1 8.10. For 1 fay vnto you,thar in hc^uc
their angels alwayts behoulcic the
face of my father V vhic)i is in hcauen.
1.14-7 & ''H 9
II, For the fonne of man is come to
faue that which was loft. 2. it. 4
15. If ihybrother trcfpafTcagainft thee,
go, and cell himhisfi^ult bicwcenc
thee and him alone:if !ic h; are thee,
thou haft vvonnc thy brother. 4.
13. J
17. And if he will not vouchefafe
to heare them , tell it vnto the
Church; and if he rcfufc to htarc the
Church alfojlct him be vnto thee is
an heathen man, and as a publicane.4
8.15.&4.H.2.& 4.11,3
1 8 Vcrely I fay vnto you , what foeucr
ye bind on earth, shalbe houndcin
heaucn;and whatfoeuer yc lofe on
eaithjshalbelofedin heauen, 3.4.12
& 3.4.20.& 4.T.2».& 4.2 10 & 4 8.4
& 4.12.4. & 4.1 2.p
§^. Againc, vcrelielfay vntoyou,chat
'; if two of you shall agree in earth,
Vpon any thing whatJoeucr chcy
shall dcnre , it shalbe gcucn them
of my father which is in heaucn. 3.
20.50
30. For where two or three are ga-
thered together in my name , there
am linthemiddesamong rhem. 4.1
j).& 4.6.4.& 4.5> 2
a 2. I fay not to thee, vnto fcucn times:
but vnto fcuencie times feuen times.
4 12}
•a^. And his fellow therfore fel doune
and befought him , faying, hauc pa-
tience with me ,and I will pay thee
all. 4>(-^3
1^ tf. Wherefore they are no more
twain , but one fleshe : let not man
therefore put a funderthat which
God hath coupled together. 4.15.22
f I. All men can not icccaue this faying
faue them to whom it Is giuen. 2.S
4».&4''? '7
t a. For there are fomc chafte , which
were to borne of their mothers belly:
and there be fome chjft which be
made chaft by men:and there be fomc
chalt , which haue made themfelues
chaft for the kingdom of heaucn, &c,
2.8.42
13. Then vyerc brought vnto him
little children , that he should put
his hande vpon them , and pray : and
thcdifciplcs lebuked them. 4.16.7
14. SufFerlittlcchildren torome vnto
me, and forbidde them not: for of
fuchisthe kingdome of heaucn 4.16
7.&4 I6.i7.&4.t6.i5
I J. And when he had put hishaiides
on them, he departed thence. 4 116
17. There is none good but vne , e»ien
God:butifchou wilt enter into life,
kccpc the commaundements. 1.13
i3,24.& J. 18 5>
li. Thou <h.<U not kill.thou shalt not
commit adultery : thou shalr not
ftcale,&c. i 8 35, 36,^7,38,3 j),&c.
to the ende of the capter.
ip- Honor thy fathtr and thy motlier.
&c.
2.8.I2,?J
ai. If thou wilt bf perfect , go, fell
that rhcH haft, t< gcue to thcpoore,
& thou shalt haue cveafure in heaue,
&c. 4.13 I 3
15. And when his difciples heard it,
they were exceedinglie arr.afcd^
faying, who then can bee faued?
2-7 5
26. And lefusbehelde them, and f^id
vnto them: with men this is vnpof
fible , but with God all things are
polhble. • i.7.5
28. And lefusfaid vnto them, verclie
I fay to you : that when the fonne
of man shall fitre in the throne of his
maiefty, ye which follovved me in
the regeneration , shall (it alfo vpon
twclut thrones , and iudge fitft^
tvvelue tribes of Il'raell. ».i6.i8.8c^
3 25. !0.
i$. And vvhofoeuer shall forfjkc
houfes f or brethcrne, or f!fters«<»r
xxxx
inc
'atlier , or mother , or wife y or
children, or landcs , for my names
fake, he shall receauc an hundreth
fouJdc more ,and shall inhcrite life
euerlafting. 5.2 5.»0
20.». For the Tcingdomc of heaoertis
like vnto a certaine houfeholdtr,
which vvcnteoutac tlic d.iwnirtgc
of the day , to hier laborers into his
vineyarde, Ji8 3
a 5. Ye knovve that the lordes of the
Gentiles haue dominatio ouer them,
and they that are great, excrcife au-
thoritic oner them, 4.11.8.&: 4.ii.'5
i6. Butit shallnotbefoamongyou:
"^ but vvhofocucr will be great «•
raong you, let him be your fcruaunt.
4.ii.8
a8. Eucn as the fonne of man came
not to be ferued , but toferue,and
togeue liis life fur the raunfome of
many. '' ' s.itf 5
21.9. Moreoiitr,thc people chat went
before, and thev alfo that followed,
cried , faying : Hf;fanna the fonne r»f
Dauid: bleli^d behcth.it commtth
ip the name of the rorde,&c. 164
•iii' VVhatfocuer ' ye shall askc in
prayer:if ye bclecue,yc shall receauc
it. 3,20.11.
25. Th- baptifnje of Tohn whence
was it? from hcauc,or of men? then
they reafoned amorig thcmfclucs
faying. if we shall lay from heaucn,
he will fay vnto rs , why did ye not
then beleoe him. 4**5-$
ji. Whether of them twaine did
the will of the father ? they faid
vnto him , the firft, Icfus Gid vnto
them,verc!y I fay vnto you, that the
Pubhcans and the harlots siull go
before you into the kingdome of
God. 18.1 4.& 3.7.1
a»,2. Thekingdome of heauenislike
vnto a certaine king , which maricd
his fonne. <}.»4-8
1 1. Frcnde,hovv earned thou in hither,
and hade not on a wedding garmet.
4.17-45
1 J. Einde him hand dc foete.take him
avvay^and caft himinco vcter darke-
i aoic.
neild : there shalbe vreeping and
gnafshing of teeth. }.i5,ii
1 4. For manie are called,buc Fevve are
chofen. ^3C4.tf
S3. The fame day the Sadduces came
to hirti , which fay that there is no
refurrcvlion. 2»io.7}
3 o. For in the refurr eftio,they neither
marie vviues , ndr wiues are be-
ItovYcd in mariage, but are as the
AngcUs of God inheauen. i.i4.5.dc
1.15. J. & 1.12.6.& 3.25.U.& 4.1.4
32. I am the God of Abraham , the
God of Ifaacand the God of lacob;
God is not the God of the dead , but
oftheliuing. 2.10.^ & 4'i6.}
J 7. Thou shaltloue the lord thy God,
with all thy heart , with all thy
fouIc,and with all thy minde. 2. 1. 11
& 2,8 51. & 3 J u
jp. And the feconde is like vnto this,
thou shaltloue thy neighbour as thy
felfc. 2.J1.1C
aj.4. Forthcy bindeheauic burdens,
and greuous to be borne , and lay
them on mens shoulders, but they
themfelues will not moue them
with one pf their fingers. 4.10. i.&
4.1 o.z6
8. But be notye called, Rabbi:for one
isyourdoftor,to witjChrift, and all
ycare hretherhe. 4.8.8
^. And call no man your father vppon
the earth :foi their isbut one , your
father which is in heaucn. 3,20. §8
aj. And ye leauc the weightier mat^.
tersof thclawe.as iudgcment, and
mercie, and fidelitic , thcfe ought ye
haue done , and not to haue \eftc the
other. 2.8. S a
a 5. Wo vnto yoM fcribcs and Pha-
rifees,hypocritcs:for ye make cleane
the outer fide of the cup , and ofthe
platter :bur within they are full of
briberieand excefTe. J»4'l^
37. Icrufalcm,Teruralem,Tvhich killeft
the Prophets, & ftoneft them which
are fent to thee , bovve often would
I haue gathered thy children toge-
ther,8fc. ?.54*'^
34.11. And many falfe Prophets shall
arifc
The Tabic.
arlfe and shall dcceaue manic. 4.5>.+
14. And this Gofpell of the kingdomc
jhalbc preached through the whole
world , for a vvitnes vnto all na-
tions : and then shaH the code come.
3.4.4*
14. For there shall arife falfc ChrKts,
and Falt'e Prophets , and slial! slitwe
great fignes and wonders : lo ch.ic
if ic were polTiblc ,thtv should de-
ccauc the verie cleft. 4 9 4
50. And then shall appeare the ligne
of ttve Tonne of man )ri he.iuen , and
then shall all the k-ndredcs of the
earth mourne, and they ihall Tee the
fonne of man come in the cloudes
of heauen with povvre and great
glorie. 2.16.17
J 6. But of that d.^yc and hourc
knovveth no man, no not the An-
gels of heauen , but my father onely.
1.14.9
45. Who then isafaichfull feruant,
and wife, whom liis mailter hath
made ruler ouer his houshi.uld , to
giue themmc^itein feaiou? 4i<J.3i
45.;. Thefoolishe toke their lampes,
but toke no oilc with them. ;.,5.7
ji. Tlicn his maftcr faid vnto him ,ic
is well doncgoodferuanc and faith-
fulhthouhaft bene faithfull in little,
I will make thee ruler ouer much:
enter into thymaiftcrs ioy. a. j.il
aj. It is well done good frruant and
- faithfull, thou halt b^nc faithfull in
little, &c.
.j.ii
2p. For vnto cucry man that hath , it
shalbc geucn , and hee shall hauc
abtindauncerand from him that hath
not, cuen that he hath, shalbc taken
away. i.j >i.& ?.i 5.4
31. And when the fonne of man com-
methin his glorie , and all theholie
Angels with him , then shall hee
fit vpon the throne of his glorie z.
16 17
J s. And before him shall be gathered
ail nations , and hee shall fcpar.itc
one from an other , as a shepeherde
feperatcih the shepe fro the goates,
i 16.17, Si 5«2 5.^
J 4. Come yc bleffcd of my father,
inherite the kingdomc prcpired for
you from the Fecundations of th«
world. j.ig.i.Si 3.18.2.& J.I 8. 3. &
3.34.x<J
J 5, For I was an hungrcd,a!ul ye gaue
me meat : I thurftcd , and ye gauc mc
drinke,&c. • t J.i^ii
40 Vercliel fay vntoyou ,in as much
as ye hauedone it vnto one of the
leaft of thefe my brethren , ye haue
done it to me. 3.18,5
41. Departe from me ye curfed , into
euerlaltmg fire, which is preprned
for the deuili and his Angels. 1.14.14
& i.i4.i5).& J. 25. 5
4^. And thefe shall go into eucrlafting
paine , and the righteous into lite
eternal!. S^S'S
26. io. Why trouble vc the vvcman?
for she hath'Tvrought a goodworke
vpon me- 3- 2 5- 8
II. For ye haue the pnore alwaics
with you , bur me shall ye not haue
Vvithyoualwaics. 4.;.i.& 4..17.16
&4.i7.;i8
1 1. For in that she porvred this oynt-
, m6nt vpon jmy body , she did it to
bury me. , j! «<^^^r/ 5 3.iS-^
1 5. And he faid to them , what will
yc geuc me , and I vvjJl deljucr him
vntoyou ?and thty appointed .nto
him thirty P'cces of fijucr. 4.! 8.14
%C» And as they did catc , lefus toke
thebread : and when he had geuen
thankes he br <ke it j and gaur it to
thed!fciplcs,and laid, take,eatcthis
ismybody. 4 14 jo » 4.1 rJ.jo.S: 4.
17. 1.5: 4.17, 20.& 4.19.23
27. aKo he toke the cup, and whe h«
had gcucn thaks,he gaue it to tf'cm,
fay ir>g, drink'- ye all of it. 49 14
38. Then laid lefus vnto them. my foulc
is veiy heauy euen vnto the death:
tarie ye here , and watch with me.
2.16. IJ.& J. 8.9
}9« So hevvent alitle furthcr,andfell
on his face, and praied, faying : O my
Father, if it bepofliblc let this cup
parte from me . neuertheles not as I
YVilljbut as thou v\Mlt. a.z6.»2
XXXX i'i
The Table.
tbc moft Viigh sh.ill ouershadowe
thcc : therefore nlfo, thar holy thing
which shall be borne of chce , shall
be called the lonnc uf God. 2.14.5
4j. And vvhenc commeth this to me,
chat the nio:her of my lorde should
come to me? 2 i'4-4
54. He hath vpholdcri Ifradl his fcr-
uaunt, being mindfull of his mercy.
2. 10 4
72. That he vvould shevvc mercy
tovvardes our fathcrrs ,andremeb€r
his holy couenaant. 2,10.4
^j. And the orh vvhich he (Vvarc to
our father Abraham. 2.:0.4
74. That we bein^ dcliuered out of
the handes of our enemies j shoidd
ferue him vvithout fco/f. 3. 1 <f. 2
77. And togfeuekiiOvvfeclge of faliia-
tion vntohis people, by cheremiifio
cf their finnec. 3. 11. 22
f^. To geue I'g^-c to themtS'.at fit in
dirkncire , and' in the shadavve of
death , and to guide our fcetc into
the vvdy of peace. 2.? 2.4
a. 1 1. That is , that vnto you is borne
this day in the Cirie of Dauid , a Sa
uior, which is OVrill the lorde. 2,
I }. And ftraioht way there was with
the Aiigetla nmltituoe of heauenly
fold '.ers , pr.ji i'l ng God, .Sc c. »• H' 5
37. And she was awidovvc about
fourcfcore and fovvcr vcares , and
went not Oiit of the templej'and fcr-
ued God vvithfaftings^and pr.ners,
night and day 4,12. i<$
52. And IcHis cncreafedinvv;fcdomc,
and ft jturc,and in fauour with. God
and men. 3.14.1
3 3. Aiid he came into all rhccoattes
about lorda,prc.iching the bapti fmc
of rcpentaunce for the rcmilTion of
fi'incs 3. 3. »^ <?; 4.'i5.7.& 4,i5).i7
S. Brmg fori-h therfire frutes worthy
amvindimcnc of l:fe, and begin not
to fay w:th your felucs , vvc hiuc
Abraham to our father : for I fay
vnto you. that God is able of thcfe
ftones to raife vp children vnto A-
braham. 3.3,$
14. The <buldiers likewife demaurr-
ded of hmi , faying, and what shall
vve do ? ^nd he faid vnto thtm , do
vi«»!ence to no man , neither accufc
any talfelyjand bccotcnt withyour
wages. 4.20.1*
1 6 lohn annfwsred, and faid re them
all , m dcede 1 baptize you with
water, but one ftronger then I,com-
mcthj^/vhofc shoos iatchet I am not
woi ti.y to vnlofe : he vyil! baptize
you with the holy Ghoft , and v vi th
fire. J.1.354.&4 "5 6,7
13, And theholy Glioft came downe
in a bodily shape like a Done , vpon
him, and there vvas a voice firom
hcauen, faying, thou .nrtmy belooed
fonne : in thee I am well pleilcd.
4 17.1l
13. .And le'us himfelfe began ro be
about thirtie ycares of age, being as
men fiippofcd the fonne of Tofeph,
which vvas the fonne of Eli. 4.16.
27,29
38. Which was the fonne of Enos,
vvhirh was the fnnne of Serb,
vvhich vv,is the fonne of Adam,
which vvas the fonne ofGod.2.12.7
& a.ij.j
4.17. And there vvas deliuered vnto
him the booke of the Prophet Efaias:
and wher: he had opened thebooke,
he found the place where it was
written. 4-^P 2 j
18. The rpiricof the lorde is vpon me,
beciufe he hath annointcd me, that
I shoul-i preach the Gof'pell to the
pooredie hath fcnt me, that I should
heale the broken in hart, i.'.^.i.flc 3.
?.:o.& J.4?
J.I 5. And touched hi'm^ faying, I will,
be thou cleane. And immediatly the
Icprofie departed from him;
14. And hecommaundcd him that he
should tell it to no man : but go,
fairh he, and shevve thy felfe to the
prieft , and offer for thy clenfing , as
Mofes hath comaundcd , for a vvit-
nciTe vnto them. J -4 4
34, Can ye make the children of the
' wedding chamber to faftc , as long
asfthc
The Tabic.
- ai the bridegromc is with them ? 4
ia.i7
^.13. And vvhcuicvvasday, hccaiied
his difciplcs , and of thcni he chofc
tvvcluc , vvliichalfohe called Apo-
III cs. 4* J- 5
»3, Kcioyccycin that day, &: be glad:
for beholde, your reward i& great in
heauen,&c. j.18.1
34 But woe be to you that arc rich,
for you haue rcceiucd your confola-
tion. i'i9-9
^6. Be ye mcrciftill therefore , as your
father alfo is merciful!. 3.7.^
J. 19* Then all the people that heard,
and the Publicanesiuilifisd God,bc-
ingebaptife4 with the baptifmeof
lohn. 3->«-3
J 5. But vvifedom is iuAified of all her
children. 3«*'«J
36. And one of the Pharifccs defired
him char he vvoulde eacc with him;
& he vrec into the Piiarifecs houfc,
and fat dovrnc at the table. 3.4-37
47. Wherefore I fay vnto thee , ma-
ny finncs arc forgiucn hcr;forshelo-
ued much. To vyhom a litlc is forgi-
uen^he dothloueahtle. 3*4'3'
8.3. And ccrtainevvome, which were
healed of euill fpirites, and infirmi-
ties, as Mary which was called
Magdalene,outof who wentfeuen
deuils. 1. 14.14
ff. And fomefcl among thornes,& the
. thornes fprungc vp with it,and cho-
kedit. 3»a.to
13. But thcy.that arc on the ftones,are
they which when they haue heard,
receiuc the word with ioy.but they
hau*; norootes , which for a while
beleuc,but in the time of tentation
goeavvay. ?.x.io
15. Butthat which fel on good groud,
are they which with an honeft and
good hart heare the word, and kepc
it,& brmge foorth frute vrith pati-
ence. 4.14.11
^ a^. Ifany man Yvill come after me,
let him deny himfelfe, and take vppc
hi* croiTc daily and follovc mc. j, i $
a6. For "Whofoeuer shall be ashamed
ofmCjand otmy vyords, oK^im shdl
the ibfine of man be ashamed,. when
he shall come in his glory , and in the
glory of the father , and ofthehoiy
Angels. i>4.3>
55. But lefus turned abour, and rebus
ked chcm, and fayd, ye know not oi
whatfpirircye are. j.av.15
10,1. After thcfetfiingcs, the lord ap-
pointed other 70. aiio,& fcnt th.m
two & two before him,&c. 4 34
6. And if the fonne of peace be there,
your peace shall relt vppon him : if
noc,it shall rcturne to youagainc.3
a3-'4
itf. Heihatheareth you, hearethn>e:
and bethatdefpilethyou, defpillth
mc. 4 J-3.&: 4.^*
j8. IlawSathan,likelightcningc,faU
downe from heauen, 1.14.1 J?
ao. Neuerthelerie , in this reioyce
not, that the fpirites are fubdued
vnto you:buc rather rcioice,betau(5i
your names arewritccn in heauen. 3
3,24.9
ai. The fame hourereioyccd lefus m
the fpiriteand fayd, I confefie vn-
to thee father , lorde of hcaucu
and earth , that thou hafl hid thefe
thinges from the wile and learned,
andhaflreuealed them to babes . e-
uen fo , father , becaufe it fo pleafed
thee. 3 i.34
22. All things arc giuen me of my fa-
rher:and nt) man knovvcth who the
fqnne is, but the fat her: neither who
the father is , faue the fonne:& he to
whom the fonnc will reueale him. 3
X.I.& 4.18.29
» J. BlefTed arc the eics,vvhich ice that
ye fee. i.5> f
^4. Fori tell you, that many Prophets
andKinges hauedeHred to fecthcfe
thinges, which ye fee, and haue not
feeneihem,&c, 2.5) i,& 2.11.^
2 5. Mai/ler, what shall I do, to enhe -
rite eternall life ? 413.13
27. Andheaunfvvered,and faid,thon
shaltUue thy lorde God, vvithall
thy hart,and with all thy fouic,and
XXXX ijij
The Tabic.
^ithall thyftrcngth, and with all an-ik/fTetlhim^
thy thought, & thy neighbour as thy
fclfe 2.8.11
Jo. Andaccrtaine maa vvcntdovvnc
from Teruralcm to Icricho, and fel a-
mongtheeues. 2. 5-iP
jtf.VVhich now of thefe three, thinkcft
thou , was neighbour to him that
fell among the theeucs ? i-^.JJ
11.2. Andheraidvnto them, when ye
pray, fay, Our father which art in
ncauen. ^.106,^4.
5. Our daily bread giuc vs for the day,
1 J.14
it. When a ftrongman armed, keep-
eth his pla e , the chinge> that he
polftfleth are in peace. X.14.IJ.&1
14.1S
»i. But when altrogcrthenhc com-
rneth vppon him, and oucrcommcth
him, hetaketh from him all his ar-
mour wherein he crufted , anddcui-
dechhis fpoyles. 1.141S
1^. And the iordefayd vntohim , in
dccde ye I'hanfces make clane the
outiidc of the cup, & of the platter,
but the in ward parte is fullof raue-
ning and vvicke«ue<«. 3-4-i^
li.^ Fearc him vvh'ch after he hath
killed, hath power to caft into hcH,
lOi 'And vvhofoeuer shall fpeake a
wcrdagainft the fonne ofm2nne,it
shall be foigiucn him : but vntohim
tliar shal biaiphtrnf the holy Ghoft,
it shall neuer be forgiue.i < j.i $.8ci
J 2I,22.& J, 5. 7
14. Manncjv'vho made roc a iudgc ,or a
deuiiicroucryour 4.11.9,11
14, ai. Go out q-iickcly into the pla-
ces anditrcctcsof the City, & bring
in hither the ponre,arid the maimed,
and the halt, and the bhnde. d^.i6, j i
1 J 7. I r;jy vnto yoU,th^t likev\'ife ioy
shall be mhcautn f.-rone finner that
conuerterh , more then for ninety &
nine lufln^ien, which nede no amcd-
tnentoflife. i.147
to. And when he was yet a great way
of,his father faw him, and nad com-
painoQ,4ad ran & tell on his necke.
3.ao.37
t6.i. And he called him, & fayd vnto
him , howe is it that I heare this o(
thee?giue an acc6 pt of thy fteward •
shippc J for thou maift be no longet
ftevvard. 310. 5
9. And I fay vnto you,make you frends
with the riches of iniquitie, that
when you shall want, they may re-
ceiue you into euerlaftinge habita-
tions. j.iS.^
15. Ye are they which iuftifie your
fclues before menbutGodknovvcth
your hartcs.&c. j<i i .;.& j.i 2.a
16, The Law and the Prophets endu-
red vntill lohn , and fince that tim«
thckingdomcof God is preached, &
euery man prcafl'eth into it. a 7.1^
j2. And it vvas <o , that thcbeggcc
died, and vvas caried by the Angels
into Abrahams bofome,8cc. 1.14.7
&i.iy.2 & J 25-tf
17 ?. If thy brother trerpafle againft
thee,rebukehim : and if he repent,
forgiuehim. J-?-^
5. And the Apoftlcs fayd vnto the
lord,incrtare our faith. 4'i4-7
7 VVhos- ii; alfoofyoUjthathauing
a feriianr plowing or feeding cattei,
would fay vntohim byandby,when
h«r were come from the fieicie, &C.3
14.1J
10. So likcwifcycwheyeliaue done
allthofe things which are comaun-
dedyou,fdy,wearevnproficablc fcr-
uats, we haue done that which was
our duety todc. i. 14.14. & 3.1 5. j
14. And when he fawc them, he fayd
vnto them, go, shew your felues to
thePricites. And it came to pafTc,
that as they vvcnt,they were clean-
fed. 3*4 4
ao- And when he vvas demaunded of
the Phari fees, when the kingdom of
God .shouldccome, he aunlvvcred
them,and fayduhc kingdom of God
commeth not with obleruation. >
I $.4
iS.i. And he fpake alfo a parable vn-
to them,to this end, that they oughe
alvyaycscopray, andnuc cowaxe
faint
The Tabic.
faint. J'»o-7
13, But the publicane ftandingcafar
of, wouldcnotlifc vppc fo much as
his eyes to hcauen, bucfniotehis
breltjfayingiO God, be merciful] to
mcafinner. 3.4, 1 8. & 3.1 2,7
14. I eel you, this man departed to his
houfe iuftified, rather the the other:
forcuery mannethat exaltcthhim-
feifc,shal be brought lovv,& he that
humble ch himfelftf , shalbe exalted.
3.4.?5.&3-"-3
41. Andlefiis fayd vntohimtreccaue
thy fight,thy faith hath faued thec.4
15.12.
1^.17. And he fayd vnto him, vvel],
good fciuauntibecaufc thou haft bin
faithfiill inavcrylitlethinge , cake
thou authority ouer ten cities. 1.3.11
& 3.15.4
»6. Vnto all them that hauc ,it shall
br g'Uen, ^ from hjm that ha'h n<>c,
eucn that he hath shall be taken ft o
him, 2. ^1 1.& }.i 5.4
»o.27 Then came to hiuj cejra.neof
thcSaddiices, which deny that there
ixanyrclurredion,&c. 2.10. 23. & 3
25 5
37. And that the dead shal rife again,
tuen Mofes shewed it beHdes the
bush,vvhin hefayd,thclordeis the
God of Abraham,and th** God of I
faa-:,and the Godof lacob. 2.io.j>
38. Forheis not the Godofche dead,
butof themvvhichliue. 4.»6.3
»i.ij. For I will giue you. 1 mouth &
vvifd'^m, where ;^g-iinft,all your ad-
ucrfaries shall not be able to fpeake,
orrefilt. 4 3 '2
>8. Ani when thefe thinges begin to
come to palTe, then looke vp,3nd lift
rp your heades, for your redemptio
dravvethneere. 3*5^ 5
aa.17. And he tookeihecup, & gauc
th.U)kes,and faid,take this, and part
itamongeyou. 4.17.20. & 4.17.43
&4.18.8
15. And he tooke bread, and when he
had giuen chankcs , he brake it, and
gaue to thcjfayingjthis is my body,
vvhichisgiucafor ^ou ; 4o this in
theremembraunceofmc. 4.}. ^.8:4
15.20.& 4.i<{. JO. & 4.17.1,20,37
20. Likevvilc alfo after fupper he
tooke the cup, faying, this cup is the
newTeftamcnt in my blood, which
is shed for you. 2.1 1.4.& 2.17.4.& 4
17.^, 20
»5. The kinges of the Gentiles rcignc
ouer them, and chey thjt beare rule
ouer them, are called gracious lords.
4.ii.8,5>.& 4.20.7
a 6. But ye shall notbefo. burlet the
greateft amonge y ou,be as the leaiti
and the chief tlt^as he that fcructh.4
II 8
32 But 1 hauc prayed for thee , that
thy faith fayle not, &c. ^,2^.6.8< 4
7.27,2«
43. And there appeared an Angel vn-
to him fromhcaue, comforting him,
1.14 6.6c 2.\ 6.i%
44. And his fweate'vvas like droppes
of blood y tricklinge duvvncto the
ground. 2.i<$.i z.& 3«S.9
6i. Then the lordc turned backc, and
looked vpon Peter:& Peter remcm-
bred the vvordeof the lorde,hovvc
he hadde fayd vnto him , Before the
Cocke crovve, thoushait denieme
thrife. J* 4' 35
62. And Peter went foorth,& vvepc
bitterly. 3-3'4
23.42. And be laid vnto lefus, lord re-
member mcjvvhen thou commeft in-
to thykingdom. 3 24.1. & 4.16. 31
43. Then lefus fayd vnto him, verily I
fay vnto thee, to day shalt thou be
with mein Paiadife. 3-25>^
46. And lefus cried with a loudvoice,
and fayd , Father , into thy handcs I
Commcndemyfpiritej&c 1.15.2.&.]
24 5. They fayd vnto them, why feekc
yehim that liueth, among the dead ?
1.14.4$
6. He is not here, but is rifen: remem-
ber hovvc he fpake vnto you, when
he was yet in Galilee. 3'2 5|
II. But their words fecmed vntothe
a fained tiling, ncichei bcleued they
sbcm. |'>«4
The Tabic.
hen arofe Peter, and rannc vnto 1 3 11, Sc i.i j.2»
the fepulchrv, and lookcdin , and 3. Allthings vvcrcmade by it, &c.i,ij
favve the linen clothes layd by them
fclues:and departed, >rvonderingc in
himfelfe at chat which was come
to parte. 3.1.4
1 6. But their eyes were holdcn, that
they couldc not knovvc him. 4.17
S^. Ought not Chrifttohauefuffered
thefe things, & to enter into hjv glo-
ry? 2.17.6.& j.i8.7.&4.i7.3X
37. And he beganne at Mofes , and ac
all the Prophets, and mrcrprcted vu-
to the in althc Scriptures the things
that were wry tten ot'him . I .;,. J .& J
2.J4
1 1. But he was take out of their fight.
4 i7z>
39. Beholde mine hands and my fcete:
for it is my feife: handle me and fee:
for a fpirit hathnot fli-shand bones,
as ye fee me haue. 2.14. 2. & 5. 2;. 3
& 4.17.29
44. All niuU befulBUed which arc
vvrytten of me in the iavv of Moles,
& in the Prophets, & inthcPfalmcs.
J. 5.8
45. Thc.i opened he their vnderltan-
ding,cnat they might vndcrftand the
Scriptures. J^-H
46. Thus tt isvvritten,and thus it be-
houcdChriltcofufftTjaad to rifea-
gaine fro the dead the third day.2. 12
4-&3.3.i3>
47. And chat repentance, 3: rcmiffion
of (innes , should be preached in his
name ainonge all aacions , begin-
ningcacleruialem. 2.12.4.3: 3.3.1
&3,3.i<>
49. Buttary yein the cityof lerufa-
Icm.vntillya be indued with power
from on hie. 4«3'*
yi. And it came to paflTc , that as he
blerted the,he departed from them,
and was caried vp into hcauen,4. 17
I O H N.
»7
XiX. tN the beginning was the word,
■L and the word was with God,
sad that word was God.i.ij.tf.^ i
7«&i.« 3 »7
4. In it was life , and the life was the
li^hcofmen. i.i3.i^.& i.i S*4*S£ 2*&
%9.ii 2.5.1.6c 4*17.$
y. And the light shineth in the darkc-
ne» , & the daikcnes comprehended
it not. 2.1,1 ^
$. That was the true light which
lightcth euery manne that commeth
into the world. 2.12.4
10, He vvasin the vvorldc , and th^
vvorlde wa* made by him , and the
world knew him not. 2.134
12. But as many as receiuehim , to
thehegaue power to be thefonnef
of God,euentothem that bcleue in
his name. 2. 6. i.& 3.1.4. & 3.20.3^
& 3.22.10
1 5. Which are borne not of blood*
nor of the will of the fleshe,norof
thevvillof man,but of God. 2.2.ij>
& 2.IJ.2.& 3,1.4
14. And the vvorde was made fleshc,
and dwelt amontf vs , 6c we faw the
glory thcrof,a$ tne glory of the only
begotten tonne of the Father, full of
grace and trueth. 1. 13. 11. & 2.12 4
& i.l4.i.& 2.14.S
16. And of his fulneshaueall Were*
ceiued, and grace forgrace.2. 13.1
&2.15.5& 3.11.9.& 3.20.1
17. For the law was siuen by Mofes,
but grace and truech came by lefuz
Chr.rt. 3.7.1 <J
18. Nomannchathfeenc Godat any
tirae;theonly begotte fonne, which
is in the bofomc of the Father , he
hath declared him. i.i3.i7.&: 2.2.20
& 2. 9.1. & 4.17.30
23. lamihe voyceof himthat crieth
in the vvildern<;s, make ftraight the
way of the lord>asfayd thcProphcc
Efaias. a.^.^
25>. Beholde the lambeofGod,which
taketh away the finnesof the vvorhl,
2.14. 5'& 2.16.5.& a«i7«4.Sc 3-4-a^*
&4.1S.T
32. SoIohnbarcwitnefTc, fayin^e,X
/aw the Ipiritccowc downc fcon»
The Table.
hcauen, liTcc a doue , and i t abode v-
ponhini. 2.1 S.^.dc 4.19.20
3 J. And Ikncvvchimnoc:buchethac
fcnrnnc cobaptilc vvich vvaccr , he
■ ■ fay:i vnto rhc , vppon vvhomc rhou
jhalc Tec the fpirite cwmc downe,
and tary ftill on him , chat is he
vviiich baptifcth with the holie
GhoU. a«5-5
36. Behold the lambc of God. z.y. $
40. Andrcwe, Simon Peters brorher,
was one ofchervvo which had hard
it of Iohn,and that followed him.4
<J.f
41. And he brought him to Iefus,&c.
4.6.$
5 t. Hereafter shall ye fee hcauen o-
pcn, & the angels of God alcending,
ai'.ddcfcendingc vppon the tonne of
man. I 1.^.1 1.& z.p.2
2.1. And lefiis vvjs Cdlied .illo , and
his d'iciples vnto rhe nnariag:. 4.1 j.3
5>. Novv whm the gouernourof the
fea<t ha<i ta(t<rdthc water that was
mad- wine, &r. 4'i.?'J
f$. Then he made a fcourgeof fmall
CordL'S , & drauethcm all out of the
temple, with the «hecpc and oxen,
tc poured out the chaungcrs money,
and ouerthrerv the tables. 4 ly.zj
15. lefus anfvvered and fayd vnto the,
dcltroy this temple , and in three
d^yesX vvillraifeicvpdgaine.2.14,4
■' & 3-5.7
•»i . But he fpakc of the temple of his
body. 2.14.4 & i'*5'7
aj Novv when he was at lerufalem,
at the palTeouer in the feaft, many
bcleued in his name> vvhe they faw
his miracles vvhichhe did. 4.25
-44. Butlcliisdid not co:umittehim-
' lelfe vnto them, becaufcheknewc
themall. 3.2.12
^ J. Verily, verily, I fay vnto thee, ex-
cept a man be borne againe, he can
notfccjhckingdomcof God. 2.5.1
S1c4.16.1j
5; Except that a man be borne of wa-
ter & of the fpirite, he can not enter
into the kingdom of God. 4.1^.25
4, Th4t vrhich is boilne of the ificshc^
isHeshetancTs. ^^^h... .f
therpirit,is <p;r»c>-^^^^^g, x.f\
13. For no maij arccndetn^>,.,4,hea*
ut;n,but he that hath defccnded irom
hcaue,euen the tonne of man which
isinheautn. 2.14.2 8i:4«*7.S®
14. And as Mofes lifted vp the ferpenc
in the vvilderneflTcjfo muft the (onat
ofmanbelift vp. 2.12.4.& 4.i»-20
itf. For God fo loued the world, that
he gaue his onelv begotten foimc,
thatvvhofoeuer belcueth in hiro,
shoulde notperishe,buthauc lifec-
ueriafting. 2,1 3.4.& s.16.4 & 3,17.*
& j.i4-»7.& 3.»4«5 & 3*4 7
t J. And lohn alfo baptifcd in Enowc
bcfidcs i>a]cm,&c. 4-' 5-^
27. Man canrccciucnothinge,exccpC
it begiuenhim from hcauen. 2.2.20
3 3. He that hath receiucd his tcitimo-
ny,hath fcaled that Gud in true. 3-1^
3
J 4. For be vvhome God hath fcnt,
fpeaketh the word of God : for God
giucth him not the fpirit by measure.
2.15.1.& 2 ij.$
jtf. He that beleucth in the fonnc,
hath eutrhtftii'.grt life, and he that
obcyetli not the lonnc , shall not (c«
life, but the wrath ot" God abydcth
on him. ' 4.16.JX
4.1. Novv whfn the lord knew, that
the Pharifees had hearde, that lefus
made and baptifed more difciplcs
then lohn. 4 » 5-6
14. But vvhofoeuer drinkcth of the
water that I shall giue him,shal ne-
uerbemorea thirlt ; but the water
that L snaU giue him, shalbc in him
a well of vvatcr,(pringingc out into
cuerlaitmghfe. 3.1. j
22. Ye worship that vvhichyeknovv
not: we V vorshippe that whi ch vvc
knovviforfaluationis ofthelcwcs.
1.5.13.&1 6.4.8c i.6.i
23. Butihehourccommeth.S: novve
is, when the true worshippers shall
vvorshippc the father in fpirite and
trueth:5cc. 3. 20.30.& 410.14
24. Godisafpiritj&c. 1.13.24
2;.I Ipiow VTcl xhK MeiHas siul come.
1 nc 1 aoic
nfift : when he Ts
l^p^^TlTitell vs all things. 115
i.5f 4-8-7
I J. 6ehoIde,I fay vnco you, lift vppc
your eyes,an<l looke on the regions.
for they arc vvhjce already vnto har-
uelL ' 4.16. 3 X
42. And they fayd vnto the woman,
now we belcue not becaufe of thy
fayiiigc; for we haiie heard him our
^^^felues.and know that this is in dede
the ChrilijChatfauiour of the world.
3.2.5
5 J. Then the father knewjthat it was
the fame hourcin the which Icfus.
had fayd vnto hira, thy fonnc liucth.
And he beleued Sc all his houfehold.
5.1. lefus fayd vnto him,ri(c : take vp
thy bcd^andvvalke. 4.1^.29
17. My father vvoikcthhithcrto,and
I vvorke.i.i3.7.& 1.15.12.& 1.1^.4
& 3.14 2
j8. Therefore the levves fought the
more tokilhim:not only becaufe he
had broke theSabbathr^butfaidalfo
that God was Piis father , and made
himfclfccquall with God. 1.1 j.i*
SI. For like as the father raifeth vp
the dcade, and quickeneth them , fo
the fonne quickeneth whom he wil.
ai. For the father iudgcrh no mannc,
but hath committed all iudgement
vnto the fonne. a.14. ).& x.itf 18
il. Becaufe that al men should honor
thefonne^as they honor the father:
he that honorcth not the fonne,
the fame honorcth not the father,
which hath fenthim.a.d. 2. & 2.14-}
14. Hethatheareth my vvorde,&bc-
Icueth in him thatfentmc, hathe
uerlaftrog life,and shal not come in-
to condemnation, but hath paffcd
from death to life. i.5>. j.& j«i$.($
& 3,24. S.& 3. 2^. I. & 4-1^.2^
jj. The houre shall come, &novvis,
when the dead shal heare thevoyce
of the fonne of God , and they that
hearc ic>shaU Hue. 2,5.i^.& 2.1 2.4
26. For as the fatlicr hath life in him*
felfe , fo likevvife hath he giuen to
thclonne, cohauelifeinhimfelfe.4
»7-9
28. Mcruaile not at this.for the houre
shall come in the which all that are
inthegraues, shall heare his voyce.
3.2J.4.& 3.25.7
2 <>. And they shall come foorth , that
haue done good vnto the refurre-
&ion of life; but they that haue done
euill, vnto the rcfurrc^ion of con-
demnation. 3.18.1
|X. There is in other chat beareth
vvitnesofme,&c. 1.(3.17
35. He was aburninge, &ashininge
candell: and ye vvoulde for a feafop
haue reioyced in his light. 3.9. 5
^6. For the vvorke which the father
hath giuen me tofinishe, the fame
vvorkes that I doe^beare witnesof
me, that the father fent me. 1.13.13
44, Howecan you bcleuc, which re -
ceiue honor one of an othcr,& fetke
not the honor that commeth of God
alone? $-it'9
46 Forhaddeye beleued Mofes , ye
wold haue beleued me.for he wrote
of me. 2.5> I
6.% J. Labor not for the meate which
perisheth,but for the meate that en-
dureth vnto euerlaftinge hfc,v vhich
the fonne of man shal giue vnto you,
ficc. 3.18 1.&4.14.2J
3^. This is the vvorke of God, that ye
beleue in him whom he hath fcnt. j
i5).iO
35, Iamthcbreadoflife:he that co«
meth to me shall not hunger , and he
that belcueth in me , shall ncuer
thurft. 3'i4.5-& 4«»7'4
37. Ail that the father giueth me,
shall come tome,aadhimchat corn-
meth come,I call not away. 3>2 2.7
& 3.24^
38. For I camedowne fromheauen,
not todoemineovvnevviIl,buthis
will which Tent me. 2.14.2
35. And this is the fathers wil which
hathfentme, thatof allwhich he
hach giuen me » 1 shoulde loofe no-
thing
1 nc 1 aoic.
tMag ,but should raifeicvpagainc
atchclaftday. 3.12. 7.& 3.2a. 10.&
}.a4.6.3c 3.24.7.& j.25.8.
40. And this is thcwiH of him chat
fent me.chac eucricma vvhichcfccch
the ronne,& bdcueth in him, should
haue cuerlaltinglife^&c .3.22.10.&
3.44.^.
44 No man can come tome, except
the father whichc fent mc draw him
and I will raife him vp at the laft day
a.a.ao.& a.j.j.ac J.2.34.& ^22 7.
& 3.24.1.
45. It is written in the prophets , and
they shal be all taught of God. Eucry
man therfore that hath heard, & hath
learned of the father commeth vnto
me. 1.3.10.& 2-a.ao.&i.5.7.& 2.5,
S.& 3,i.34.& ^.t/\.t.Sc 3.34.14.
46. Not that any man hathe fecne the
father, faue hcewluch is ofGod,hc
hathe feene the father. 3.3.34.& 3.
2a.io.& 3.24.1.
47. He that beleticthtn me,hath euer-
laftinglife. i.i?.t}.
48. I am the bread of life .3.1 1. p. & 4.
17.4.&417.8.
4^. Your fathers did eat Manna in the
vvildcrnes,and arc dead. 2.10.5.
50. Thr$isthe bread vvhichecometh
downe from heauen , tha t he which
catech of ic.should not die. a. 1 0.6,8c
4-»7-34.
51. I am the liuinge bread, whichc
came downe from heaue:ifany man
eat of this bread , he shall liue for
euer. and the bread that I will geue
is my fleshjvvhich 1 will geue for the
li(eofthevvorld.3.ii.8.& 4,i7.5.&
4.1714.
53. Then lefus fayd vnto them,verclic
vercly I fay vnto you, except ye eate
the flesh of the fonnc of man , and
drinke bis blood, ye haue no life in
you. 3.! 1.5.& 4.17.5,
54. VVhofbeuer eatcth my flesh and
drinkerh my blood, hath etcrnall life
• and I will raife him vp at the lafte
day. 3.ii.5).&4.i7.34.
5^. For my flesh is meat indeed , and
mybipodis drinkeindeedc. 3.17.5.
8r 4.17.S.
5(f. Hec that eatcth my flesh, 3c drin-
kethmy blood, dvvellethinme,and
I in him. 4.17 33,
57. As the liuinge father hathe fent
Bnee,foliue 1 by the father, and he
that cateth me,euen hcc shal liuc by
nie- '•«7.3r»
6$, Therfore faydc I vntoyoujthat no
tnancan come vnfomecxcept it b«
geuen vnto him of my father. 3.23.
70. Haue not I chofen you tYvelue,ac
one of you is a diucU? 3 .xi.j.Sc 3.
a4^9.
7.15. My dodrinc not mine , but his
that fent mee. 2.8.26. & 4 8.4.
37. No we in the lade and great day
ofthc feafl:e , lefus ftode and crycd,
faying:If any ma thurfl ,let him com*
vntomcanddrinke.2.i<S 14.& 3.1.2.
& 3.i.3'.& 4.19 6,
39. For the holie Gholl was not yet
geuen,bicaufe that Icfus was not yet
glorified. 4,17.21.
8.12. Then (pake Tefus againe vnto
them, faying, I am thel'ght ofthc
vvorlde:he that followeth me,';hall
notwalkeindarkenes but shal haue
the light of life. 2.14.3. & 3.2.1. &
3.ii;i2.& 4 19.23.
»*. For lam not alone, but land the
father. &c. 1. 13.17.
16. But he that fent me j'stravvcrand
the thinges that Ihaue heard of him
thofe fpeakc I to the vvorlde. 1.8.
i6.
30, As hee fpake thefe thinges , many
beleuedinhim. ?«i.5»
31. Then fayed lefus to the Icwct
whiche belecuedinhim:ifye conti-
nevy inmy vvorde.yeareverehemy
difciplcs. 3.2.1a.
34, Verelie,vcrelie,I fay vnto you,tbat
vvhofoeucr committeth finne,isthe
feruauntoffinne. 2.2.27.
44. Ye are of your father the deuill,&c.
1.14. '5. he harh been a murtherec
from the beginning , and abode noc
in the truthe , bycaufc there is no
iruih in him:yv}Kn he fpcakcth alic.
then rpeaketh he ofhis ownc: for he
»s a liar, and the father thereof. 1. 14.
18.& I.i4.i8.& 1. 14.15)
47. He tharis of God ,heareth Gods
worcics ye therefore heare them not
bycaiifeye ;iienot of God. 42.4.
50. And I fecke not mine ownc praife
but there is one that (ceketh it , and
ludgcth. a. 14. 2.
36. Your father Abraham reiovccd to
fee my day : and he fa w it , and was
gladde. t y.i.& 2.S0.4.
58. lefusfaid vntathcm,vere]ie,vere-
Jie I fsy vnto you, before Abraham
yvas,Iam. 2.14.2,
5.5 Neither hath this man finned, nor
his parenresibut that the vvoikcs of
God shold be shewed on him.;. 17.1
5, As longe as I am in tiic vvorlde,!
am the light of the vvorldc. 2.1 4. j.
€. As font as he c had thys fpoken, hec
(pac on the ground e ,and made clay
of the rpittlc,and annointcd the eyes
oithe blinde with the chy 4.15). 1 8.
7. And faid vnto him , go washc thee
in the pooIe of Siloami' vvhichc is by
intcrpretatio, fent/ic went his way
therefore , and washed , a(}6 came a-
gaine feeyng. j\,%^,%^.
94. And faid vnto him: gcueglorie vn-
to God, 5cc. 2.8.24.
JK Now we know that God heareth
not finners; but if any ma be a wor-
shipper of God , and doth his will,
him heareth he. j. 20. 7.3c ^.20. 1 o.
JCw?. To him the porreropcncth, and
the sliepe heare his voyce,3nd he cal-
leth his ownc shepe by name ,3nd
Jeadeth then» out. :.24 5.
4. Anri when he hdth Tent itirthehis
ovvne shepe, hec goeth before them
and the shepe folio we him : for they
know his vovcc, ?.22.io.& 4-2.4.
5. And tilt y will not follow a itranger
but they flee fro him;for they knovv
notthe voyce of/lrangcrs. 3.22.(0.
7. Then faid lefus'vnto them againe,
verelie,verelie I fay vnto you, I am
the dore of the shepe. 4,1^. a j.
f. lam the di)re:bynie ifa;iy man eater
in^hec shall be iaued , and shall goe
1 aoic
in &• goout,& findepafturffi a'i4.f
II. I am the good $hepeherde,the gone]
shephcardc geueth his life for his
ihepc 2. i4.;..< 4.19.44.
14. 1 am the good shepeherde , sn<i
knowe mine, &c. 42.4,
1 5 As che father knov veth me,fo knovy
I the father,and Hay dovvneiny life
formyshep*. 2.16.,?,
16 Other sbq>e I haue alfo,vvhit. h nre
notofthis f**lde:the alibmuit I bring
&c. J 4.6.
17. Therefore dothe my father louc
me,bycau(e Hay dt>vvnemy life,th^t
1 might take It againe 2.12.4.
18 Noman takethit from mee, but I
lay it dovvneofmyfolfl haue power
tolay itdovvnc .and I haue power
tocjke it againe:this comaundemcnt
haue Irecciucd of my father. 2.1 24.
& 2.t6. ?,
26. But ye beleue not:for ye are not of
my shepe, &c. 3.21 10,
iy. My sheepe heareroyvoycc,ai>dI
know them,&c. J 24 <{
28. And I geue vnto them eternal] hfc
and they shall neuer pcrirhe, neither
shall anie plucke the our of my han4.
3.15.5.& 3.2i.f.& J.22.7.& ?.24.<5.
25>, My father which gaue them me is
greater then alf, and none is able to
take them out of my fathers hande.
J. 22. Its.
JO. land my father arc one. 2.8.:<J,
34. Is it not vvritte in your la vv,I faid,
ye arc Gods? 4,26.31.
35. tf he called them Gods, vnto
whome the vvorde of God was
geurn, and the Scripture cannot b«
broken. 4 20.4,
37. Ifldonot the vvorkcs of my father
beleeue menot. 1.15.13,
11.25. I am the refurredion, and the
life : he that beleueth in me , though
he were dead, yet shall be liue. i.i 3,
I J.& a.i2.4.& 3.a5.9.& 4.1*? 17.
4?. Father,l thankc thee,bycaufe thou
hafthcarde me. 1.13.13.
43. Ashe had fpokcthcfe things ,he
cryed with aloude voyce : Lazarus,
come fourth, 4 ^9i9»
44. Then
J. lie J.
44. Then hethflc was dcadc, came
forth boundc hand and foore with
bandcs,and his face was bounde
with a napkin. Icfus (aid vnto them:
loofchim, &lethimgoe. 3«4-5-
47. Then gathered the hie pricftcs,and
the phanfes a councell ,and faidc;
what shall we doc?&c. 4.97'
15.27. Father„faueme fro thishourc:
but thcrforc came I voto this houre.
2,12.4 & 2.16 13.
a8. Facher,glorifie thy name, &c.2,
12.4,
31. NovY is the iudgemcnt of this
vvorld:nowe shall the prince of this
vvorlde be cafl out. 1 . 14 13
3 ». And I , if I were lift vp from the
earth, will dravve all mine vnto me,
J.15 tf
39. Therefore coulde they not beleue
bycaufe that Efaias fay^n againe. } .
24,1 J.
41. Thtfethinges f^idc Efaias, when
he fawe bis gloric and fpake of him.
i.i;.ii.& i.i ^.33.
45. For they loued the praifc of men,
more then the praifc of God. j.i 1.9.
49. For I haue not fpoken of my felfe.
&c. 4-8. ij.
13.4. Hcrifcthfromfupper,and layeth
afidc his vppcr garmentes » and toke
atowel^and girdehimfclfc.4.15 2 j
15. Fori haue gcucnyou an exaumple
that ye shoulde doe , eucn as I haue
done to you. 3-<tf. 2.
t8. I fpeakc not of you all :1 know
whome I haue chofcn,&c.3 iz.j.Sc
3.24.9-
34. A nerve coromaundementegeuel
vnto you , that ye louc one anmher,
as I haue loued you , that euen fo ye
loue one an other. 3.16.2.
X4.1. Ye beleue in God, beleue aifoia
mee. i.i 3.1 j.& 2.6.4.
5. Thomas faid vnto him : Lorde we
know not whither thou goeft: how
can we then knovve the way? 4. 17.
tf . I am the way, and the truihe , and
thelife,&c 1,13.17 8f a.<f.i.& 5.
2u.a(.fic 4 16.17.
8. And Philip faide Tntohlm-.Lorde,
?bevve vs thefacher,and it fuffifeth
vs. 4.17.* 3.
10. Beleucft thounot ,that lamin the
fjthcr , and the father in me ? th«
wordes whichc I fpake vnto you,
I fpake not of my felfe:but the father
that dvvelleth in me , he doth the
vvorkcs. 2.14 2. & 4 8.13.
11. Beleue mee, that I am in the father
and the father in me:at the leaft, be-
leue me,for the veric workes fake.i.
I?. 13
13. And vvhatfocueryc askeinmy
name , that vvill I doe, that the ft.
thermay bee glorified in the fonnc.
3.10.J7,
i^. And I will pray the father, and he
he shall giueyou an other comfbr«
ter>&c. i.i 3. 17.& 4.8.11.
17. Euen the fpititcof truetb , whom
the vvorlde can not reccfuc, bycaufe
it feeth him not , neither knoweth
him;butye know htm, for he dwcl^
Icth with you , & shalbe in you. 3 i,
4& J a J>.
26, Bntthecomforter, vvhichc is the
holie Ghofte whome the father wi|
fcndc in my name ,hce shall teache
you all things , and bring all thingcs
to your remebrauncc, which I haue
toldcyou.2 »i.& 3.1.4.&4.8.8.& 4. .
8.! 3.
»8. Formy father is greater then 1. 1,
13 2<fe
30. He reafter will I not fpeakc many
thinges vnto you:for the prince of
this vvorlde commeth ,andhehatli
nought in me. 1. 14.18.
1 5.1. J am the trevv vine, & my father
is an husbandeman : euerie brancho
that bearcth not frutc in mee, he
takcth away: and euerie one that
bcareth frute,hee purgcthit ,thatic
may bringe forthe more. 2.J.9.& 2.
14.3.&4.19 34,
3. Now are ye cleane through the
vvorde,'Yvhiche i haue fpoken vnto
y<^"- , 3.<5.3.
5. 1 am the vice,vearethebranche$:h«
(hat abideth la (nce,and IinhiiB,the
fame bntigeth forth muchc Fruce: for
without me,&c» 2.2. S.& 2.3 p & 2.
5.4.&4.i«;.34.
10. Ifyc shall kccpc my comafidcmets
yc shall abide m my louc , cuf n as I
hauc kept my fathers commaundc-
nients an«i abide in his loue .3.16.2.
t6. But I haue chf)fen you , and ordei-
ncd you , that ye go and bringe forth
frutc,& that your frutercmaine,&c.
?.a2.3.& ?.22.8.& 4 1.6.
15>,TFyewere of the world, the world
vvolde louc his ovvne: bui byc-iufc
ye are not of the vvorl<<c,but 1 hauc
clioien you out of the world, there-
fore the world hatet'n you .j,»».T
S6. Euen the fpiritc oftruth, which
procedeth of the father, 5(C 1.13 17,
1^2. They shall excommunicate you,
Ice. ^.iJ.
7. It is expedient for you, that I goe
avvay,&c.i.i5.2<$.& 2.16. 14.& 3.2^
3. & 4.17.25.
ti. Of iudgemcnt, bycaufethe prince
of the vvorldc js iudged. 1. 14.13
12. I hauir yet many rhinges to fay
vntoyoUjbutyccannotbcare them
away. 3. 21.2. & 4.8.14.
IJ. V Vhenheeiscome vvhichcis the
fpirite of truthc , hcc will Icade you
into all truth : for he shall not fpeake
oi him felfe,but whatfoeucrhcslull
hearc,tHat shall he rpe3kc,&c.i . y i.
&.3.». 34.& 4.8.8.x 4.S.1).
»0. VcrcliCjVerelic I fay vnto you, that
ye shall vvecpe and lamentc,and the
vvorldc shall reioycc : and ye shall
forroTve, but your forrovve shalbe
turned to ioye. ?-8.j>.
»4. Hitherto haue ye asked nothinge
in my name.askc&yc shall receiue,
that your ioye mayebe full. 3,20.17.
±6. In chat day shall yc aske in my
name, 8fc. 3.3018.
a8. lam come out from my father, and
came into the vvorldc:againe,l Icaue
the vvorldc, and goc to my father.
4.17.25.
17. ;. And this is life eternal!, that they
knovve rheero be the onelic verie,
Ood,and vyhome thou halt fcnt Icfus
Tabic.
chrifte. 1.13.25.8c »;tf. 1.8c ^.i.j.
$. And now glorihe mec,thou father
with thine ovvvne feife, with the
glorie which 1 had with thee, be-
fore the vvorldc was. (i3.8dci.
1 J. 22 & 2.14.2.
6. I h.iue declared thy name vnto the
men whiche thou gauctt mee. out of
the vvorlde.'ihen they vvere,i5i thou
gaucft themmc. ^24 t & 3 24 6.
9.1 pray for them :I pray not for the
world but forthe vvhiche thou haft
gsucn nic.for they arc thine, j . 2 2.7.
12. While I was with them in the
vvorldc , I kepte them in thy name;
thofc that thou gaueilmec , I kcpte,
& none of them islo{te,but the cbilde
of pcrditio,that the Scripture might
bcfulfiUcd. 3.2 2.7.& J.24 6.7. >),
1 5. I pray not th at thou shoui dtU t.ikc
the out o^hevvoridc:but that thou
kcepe them from euill. 2.5.1 1.
t^. And for their fakes fanaifie I my
fclfc, that they alfo may bee fanSi-
fied through thy truthc 2.1 j. 1.4 &
2,i5.5.& 2.17. 6.& 3.11.12,
31 . That they all may be one , as thou
father art in me , and I in thee, cucn
that rhey may be alfooncin vsrthat
the vvorldc may bdeeue, that thou
haftefentmcc. 3 a. 24.
18.4. Then lefus, knovvinge all things
that should come vnto him: went
forthe , and laid vnto them: vvhome
(cekc yc? a.J'S.j.
^6. Icfus anfvvered;my kingdome ic
not of this world : if my kingdomc
were ofthis worldc , my fei uauntes
would furclvhght,that I should not
•be deliucred to the lewes : but
nowe is my kingdomc not from
hence. 2.15.3.
j7. Euerie one that is of truth,heareth
my voice. 42 4.
J 8- Pilate faid vnto him , vvhatls
truth?& when he hadfaidthjt,he
went out againe vnto the Ievves,8c
faid vncothcjlfindcinhimnocaure
at all. 2.15.5.
i5>.3o. Now when lefus had recciucd
of the vinigre,hc faide, it is finished,
&c.4.i8.3.i|
&c. 4.18.3,13
J4. But oneof the fouldiers with a
{pcdre , pcarcedhis fif^e, andf<irth
with came there out blood & wa-
ter. 4,i4.as.
35. Nocaboneof him shal be broken.
ao.8. Then vvcc irfalfo the other difci-
plc , which came firfl to the (c-
pulchrc , atiJ he fav v« ic , atiU bele-
ued. 3''*4
17. Touchc me not:for I am not yet a
iccndcd to my father, &c. 2.1 2. a. & 4
17.39
15. The fame day the at night, which
vTas the firftdayofthe vveeke , and
Tvhen the doores Wcrc shut where
the difciples \'verc affebled for fcarc
otthc levves, camelefus and ftoodc
in themidde$,&c. 4.17.29
Si. And when he had defayd that, he
breathed on them , and fayd vnto
them : rccciucthe holyGhol<.4.i9
»j. VVhoiocuersfinjies ye remit, they
are remitted vnto them ; and vvho-
{oeuers flnnes yeretainc, chey are
retained. j.4.io,8f 4.1.22 & 4.2.10
& 4.6.;.£c 4 6.4.& 4.8 4.5: 4 ii.t
& 4 I 3.4
s8. Thou art my lorde^de my God. i.i 5
II
31. But thefe things are wry tten, that
ye might belcue , thatlefus is Chrift
the fonne of God, and thatin bele-
uing,ye might hauchfcj^c, 3.J.6
11.15. Simon fonne of Joanna . loucll
thou me more the thclcphc fayd vn-
to him, yea lord, thou knowcft that-
Iloue thce:he faid vnro him,fcdcmy
lambes. 4.6.3. dc 411 !•& 4.ip.z8
18. When thou waft yonge , thou
guidcdllthyfelfe,&vvalkcdft whe-
ther thou vvouldeft;but vrhen thou
shait be olde,&c. 38.10
ACTES.
I.J. "-pP whom alfo he prefcnted him
'- felfealiue after that he haddc
futFcrcd by many infallable token<;
being (eeneof tnemby the fpaccof
forty dayes, andfpeakingeof chofc
i;:
1 aDic.
thingtfs which appertained to the
kingdoms ot God. a.i6. 14.2: 3.25.^
&4.«7»7
5. For lohn in decdc baptifed with
water, but ye shalbe baptifed with
the holy Ghoft , within thefe fev vc
dayes. 4.15.18
8. But ye shall receiue power of the
holy Ghoft , when he shall come on
you : and ye shall be w^itncffes Vn-
to me b«'ch in lerufalem, jind in all
ludea , and m Samaria, and vnto the
vticfmolt pane of the earth- 4 ^-'z
&4-«^28
^ And vvhenhe hadde fpokcn ihefc
things while they beheldr , he was
takc^n vp,for a cloude tookc him out
of their light, a.i 6.1 4.& }.?5 .i.& 4
17.17. &4.17. 27
10. Behold two men ftoode by them
in white dpparcll. 1.145
ir. This lefusvThich is taken vpfrcm
ou into heauen, shall fo come, as ye
auefeenehim go into heauen. 1.14
6 & a.i<.i7 flc 4 t7.i4,?.7
I J, And inthore dayes Peter fioode
vpin the middcs of the difc.plcs,an4
fayd(njovv the number of name jihat
were in one place , were about aa
hund'rthand ivvtuty) 4-i-iX
aj. And they prcfentcd two, Io(cph
called Brfrf:bas,vvh<.fefurnamc was
luftiis , i)d Matrh as. 4.3.1 f.& /f, j
M
i6. Then thcYsaue forth their lottes;
and the lot fell on Matthias , and he
washya common confent counted
with the tieuen Apofiles. 4-3.15
a.j. And there appeared vnto them
clout n tnr.oci, like fire, and it fatv-
ponethofihcm. 415.8
4. And they were all ftlled vtith the
holyChoit, and beganneto tptake
with otht-r tong«;$. 4.158
ai. Who (0 euer shall call on the
name of theLorde , shalbe fawed.i
I j.ao
aj. Him, Tfay, h.^ueye taken by the
handes of the wicked, bcingedeli-
uered by the determinate councell
and foreknowledge of God, & haue
Y YYY
crucified and flaine: i.i9.i.& ^.tzS
24. Whom God hath raifedvp,& loo -
fed th€ forrowes of dcath,bef aufe it
was vnpollible , thatheshouldebe
holdcn of ic. 3.i<S.ii.& 3>(4$.t2
3 J. Since then that he by the right
hande of God hath bin exalted , and
hathreceiued of his father the pro-
mi fe of the holy Ghoft, he hath shed
foorth this vvhich ye novvefee and
hearc. 2.16.1$
37. Mcn,and brethren, what shal we
do? j.j,4.&4.itf.i}
38. Amende your Hues, andbebapti-
fedeucry one of you in the name of
lefus Cbrift , for the remiffion of
finnes . & ye shall receiuc the gift of
the holy Ghott. 4.1S.7.& 4.i6,» j
3^. For the promifc is made vnto you,
and your children, and to all that ars
a farreof, eucnas many as the Lord c
our God shall call. 4. 1 6.1 5
41. Then th«y that gladly rcceiucd his
v^orde, vverebaptifed and the fame
day, there were added to the Church
about three thoufan^e foules. 4.15.7
& 4.17.6
4s. And they continued in the Apo-
ftles doctrine, and;felovvshippc,and
breeking of bread, and prayers. 4.17
5 &4--'7.j5.iJf4 »7-44
^.6. Then fiydPcrcrtSiluer and Golde
haue I none , but fuch as I haue, th;<t
gitieltbeein rhename oflcfus <whrift
ofNazartch^nievp and walk e. i.i)
i3.&4,ip 18
xj. And ye killed the Lorde of life^
vvhome God hath raifed from the
deadc , vvhereofvve arewitnefTes.a
17.1
i8. But thofe things vvhich God before
had shevvcdby the mouth of ail his
Prophets, that Chriftshouldc Puffer,
Sec. f.i8.i
19. Aniendc your !iues therefor*, and
turnc,rhatyour finnof may be pur a-
vvay,&c. J 3.20
»i. vvhome the heauen muft con-
tainc vntill the time that all thinges
be reftored, vvhich God hathfpoken
by the naouch of all his Prophetes,
1 dUXC.
fmce the vvorlde began. 2.1 ^.i^^ 4
17.»9
25. Ye are the children of the Pro-
phets,and of the couenaunt, vvhich
' God hath made vnto our fathers.
Sec. 2.1P.2 ,>.& 4.i6.r5
26. Firft, vnto you God hathrailird
vppe his fonne lefus, and him he
hath fenttoblcfife you, in turningc
euery one of you from your iniqui-
ties. i'3'io
41 1. Neither is there faluation in any
other : for amonge men there is ge-
uen none other name vnder heauen,
whereby we mult be faued. a.i^.i
28. To doe vvhatfoeuer thinehandc
and thy councell hadde determi-
ned before to be done. 1.18.1.&1
18.;
3 J. And the tnultitudc of them that
beleued, were of one hart,& of oac
roule:&c. '4 i-J
5.4. Thou halt not lycd vnto men,buc
vnto God. '.i3.»5
1 6. 1 here came alfo a multitude out
of the cities rounde about vnto le-
rufalem, bringingefickc fo!ke5,and
them vvhich were vexed vvithvn-
cleane fpirites,Tvho were al healed,
4.15). 18
2p« We ought rather to obey God
then men. 3'S^9
31, Him hath God lift vppe vvithhjs
right hande, to be a princeanclafa-
uiour, to giuc reper/.ancc to Ifraell*
and forgiueneiieo? (lones. }.3'«*
41. So they departed from the coua-
Cell, reioycing that they rrerc coun*
ted worthy 10 futfcr rebuke for his
name. 5*8.7
tf.T. . And inthofedayes, as the num.
ber of the Difciplcs grewe, therea-
rofe a murmuringe of the Grecians
towardes the Hebrcvves, becaufc
that their vviddovves vvercnegle-
Sted in the daylie minifleringe. j.x
2. Then the tvveluc called the multi-
tude of the Difciples together, and
fayd:It is notmeete that vvc should
leaue the vvordc of Cod to ferue the
cables.
The
\ tables. 5.».^.&4.?.t5.&4»''i>
J; VVhcrforc brethren,lookcyououc
amongt you fcucii men of honelt re-
porte,&c. 4 3-5>
6. And chcy prayed, and layed their
handes on them. 4. j. >5
7. And the vvovdeof God incrc^fcd,
and the number ot the dilciples was
multiplied in Icrulalcm greatly, &c.
J 1.6
10. But they vveie not able to refi/l
the vvifedom, and ihe fpirite by rhe
vvhichhcfpakc. 3»?.i»
7.5. And he g:uie him none inheri-
tance in it , nu , not the bredch of a
.foote:&c. 2.10.1 J
a8. Vviltthou kiUmc, asthoudid
dell the Egyj tia.i yeUerday ? 4. 20.
to
44. Our fathers ha ide the tabjrna clc
' of vvitn^jilct in the vvilderneffe , as
he haddc appointed, fpc-^kingevnto
Mofes , thcit he shouide make it ac-
cord; nge to the fashion that he had
fecne. 2.7.1
48. Themofthigh dvvellethnotin ce-
ples made with bands, &c, 3.20. jo
&4-'.5
5 J. Which hauerecciucd the law by
T the ordinaunce of Awgels, and h.iue
. Dotkepcit. i.i4-i>
5 J. But he being ful of the holy Gholt,
. looked fled f^UUy into heauen , and
favv the f^lory of God, & lefus ftan-
' • <ling at the right handc of God, 3.2 5
v- • 5.3t 4. 17. 17. & 4.i7.J5>
j6. Andfaid-beholdejl feethehcaues
open, and the fonne of man ftandirig
at the right handofGod.2.i<J.i5.&4
17.2^
J9. And they ftoned Steucn , who
. called on Gad , and fayd , Lorde le-
fus receiuc,5cc. i.i}.f 3.&I.15.2.& ?
J, 1 5. Then Sin*onhimfelfebelcuedaI-
j fo,and was baptiled, and continued
with Philip , 5c wondrcd when he
. favv the fignes,&c. ?.2.io
14. They fcnt vnto them Peter & lohn.
4-6.7.&4-«5*
15. Which when they were come
Table.
downc, prayed for them , that they
mightreceiue th'e hbly Ghcft.4.i5.tf
16. For as yet , he was come downc
on none ofthe, but they were bap-
tifed onely in the name of the Lorde
lefus. 4.i5.6.8d 4.«5>.8
17. Then layed they their handes on
them, and they receiued the holic
Ghoft. 4 1 5.8. & 4. i^!.?!
1 8. And \'vhe Simon favv, th.it thi ougli
laying on of the Apoftles handes, tag
holy Ghod was giuen, he ottered
them money. 3.2.10
32. Repent therefore ofchis thywic-
kedncfl'e, and pray God,tliat ifit be
poflibie, the though: of thine heart
may be forgiuen thee, 4.1.2^
27. And he arofe,and went on-.&: bc-
holde,actrtaiBC Funucheof Ethio-
pia, Candaffs Qj.feeneof the Ethio-
pians chiefegouerror, who had the
rule of all her treafure, and came to
lerufaiem to vvorship. 3.2.31
31. Aiidhe r5yd,howccan l,exceptl
hadaguidt?3fc. i-^'i*
37. And Phdipfayd vnto him, if thou
beleucit with ai thy hart, thou maiii,
&c. 4.«4.J}.&4.i<?.23
J 8. j^dthey went dovvf>c both of the
into the warer, both Philip and the
£unuLhe,&he baprifed him.4. 1^.22
& 4 16. J I
p.i And Saulyet breathing out rhrcat-
ninges and tlaughter againft the di-
fcipiers tif the Lord, &c. 3.2.^
3. Novve 3s he iourncd , it came to
paffe , that as he was come net re to
Damafcus , fuddenlie there shined
rouadc about him alight fromhea
uen. 417.17
4. And he fell to the earch,and heardc
avoycc,faymge vntohimSauljSauIj
Yvhyper(ecuteft thoume? 3 2 5.3.
& 4.17.29
6. Arife and go int-o thecity , andic
shalbe tolde thee what thou shale
do. 4.3.5
10. And there was a cettaine difciplc
at Damafcus named Ananias , and
to him layd the Lorde in a vifiort. A-
nanias , and he fayd , beholde , 1 am
Yvyy ii
A lie i
herCjIord. j.i.4
13. LuTd,lhaueh«irdbymanyof chis
nianne> hovve muchecuyl hehacli
done to thy fainccs ac lerufaiem.
i.t j.i;.
14. Morcouer here he hath authority
of the high priefUs, to bindealhthac
call on chy name. i.ij.ij.
15 Hcisa chofcn vcflTell vnto me,&c,
4.J.J.
1 7 Then Ananias went his way , an i
encrcd into thehoufe, and put his
handcs on hym, and Taydc, brother
Si^ui, the Lorde hath fent mc (cuen
lefus that appeared vnto thee in the
way as thou catncftjthat thou migh-
telt rccciue thy f)ght,&c. 4,19- lO
19. So was Saule ccrtaine dayes with
the Difciplcs which were at Dama
feus, ,^ i.i.6
%$. Then the difciples tooke him by
night, & put him through the wall,
Sclethimdovrne inabasket. ^.i.6
}<S. There was alfo at Ioppa,a certain
woman a Difciplc named Tabitha,
which by interpretation is called
Dorc3$:shevvasfull of goodw^orks
and almes which she did. ^.1.6
g8. Nowe forafniuch as Lidda was
neerc to loppa,and the dilcipies had
hearde that Peter was there, they
fent vnto him two men, &c. j.2.tf
40. But Peter put them all fuorth,and
knelcddovvne,8: prayed, &c. 4.ii>.2
toi. A deuoutman,and one that fea-
red God with all his houfcholde,
which gaue much almes to the peo -
ple,&c. J. 24.10
J . He law in a vifion euidently^about
the ninthe hourc of the day ) an An«
gellofGod commiug in to him, &c.
4-35
15. Anditcame topaffeasPeter'-amc
in , that Cornelius met him, and fell
downc at his fcete^and worshipped
him. ' I.". J
}f. And faid, Cornelius, thy praycris
heard, and chine almcs are had in re-
Biembraunce in the light of God.)
i.ji
34. Ofa truth I perceiuet that Godis
no accepter of perfons. 3. 1 7.4.& j
tyto
42. And he commaundedvs to preach
vnto the people, arid to teltific,that
ic is he that is ordained of God a
iudge of quicke and dead. 2. 16.17
43. To him alio giue all the Prophett
witnertc, that through his name all
that beleuein him shall receiuere-
roiflionoffinnes. }-4»25.& 3.5.S
44. While Peter yet fpakc thefc
words, the holy Ghoft fell on all the
which heard the word. 4.1 6. j t
48. So he commaunded them to be
baptifed in the name of thelord,&c.
415 ij
II. 5. Thou wcnteftintomen vncir*
cumcifedjand halt eaten with them.
4.6. 7
4- Then Peter began, & expouded the
thing in order to them. 4>^-7
16, Then I remembred theworde of
the lord , huw he faidtlohn baptifed
with water,butyoushalbe baptifed
with tiie holy Ghcft. 4.15.88
18. When they hearde thefethinges,
they held their peace , and glon hed
God, fayingcThenhath God alfo to
the Gcntiies ,graunted repentaunce
vnrolifi. 3 J«2i
i6. Infomuchjthat the difciplcs were
Hrlt called Chriiiians in Antiochia.}
i.6 Sc 4 i<. )i
a<> Then the <^ifcip!cs euery manac-
cordii^ge to his ability, purpofcdto
fend ruccour,&c. }.2.tf
1 ». i 5 . Then fay d they , it is his Angel.
i.f47
13.2. Separate me Barnabas, & Saulc,
for. the workc whercunto 1 haue
call el them. 4')-i4
3 . Then failed they , and prayed, and
laid their hands on them, & let them
go. 4.3.i;.&4.i 2 14.& 4 I2.i5
36. Hovvbcit,E)auid after he had fer-<
ued his time, by the councell of God
heflcpt, and was laid with his fi-
ther,and faw corruption, j . 20. 1 }
38. Eic it knowen rnto you rhcrc-
forc, men & brethren , that through
this maant is preached vnto vou the
forgiucnes
1 he 1 able.
forgiuencfrcofnnnes.j.!r,j.& 3
.IX
3P. And from all thjnges, from which
yc coulic not be uiftiHcd by the
larvc of Mofcs , by him euerie one
thatbcleucthjis iultitieU.a.i7.5«& 3
II. J
4 J. VVhichfpakc tothem,& cjchor-
tcd chemto cotinucin ihe grace of
God. ».j8
48. And when the Gentiles heard it,
they were glad , and glorified the
word of the lordc : and as many a»
were ordained vnto eternal life, be-
leued. |.i.ii.& ;. 24.1, 1 J
51. And the difciples were filled with
ioy,and with the holy Ghoft. j.a.^
14.1^. Who in times pall fuffered all
the Gentiles to vvalke in their ovvne
vvayes. 1.5.1 j.8c a.ii.tx
10. Hovvbeit, as the difciples ftoodc
^ rounde about him, he arofe vp, and
came into the cicy,&c. 3. a. 6
%2, We muft through many afflidios
enter into the kingdome of God, j .8
I.& }.i8.7.& j.a.l
»j. And when they hadde ordained
them Elders by eledion in euerie
Church, and prayed,andfafted.thcy
comended th« to the lord, in whom
they bcleued. 4.3.7,12,1 5. £c 4.1a
16
15,7. And when there hadde beenc
great difputation, Peter rofe vp,and
iayd vnco them : Ye menne and bre-
thren, ye knovve that a good while
ago,amonge v$ Godchofeout me,
&c. 46.7
$, And heput nocdifferccebetwene
VS& them, after that by faith he had
purged, &c. J.14.8.&4.X4.4
10. Novvc therefore why tempt ye
God, and lay a yoke on the difciples
neckes^&c. 3. a 5
IX. But we bcleue,through the grace
of the lord lefus Chri/t,tobefaucd,
euenas they do. )>S«4
*o. But that we wryte vnto them,
that theyablUine themfelues from
^IthineiTe of idols, and fornication,
and that that is Itrangled, &c. 4.10
3
a^. That is,thatyeab{laine fro things
oflfred to idols, &c- 4.10.17.
16. 1. Then came he toDerben and to
LyUra:and beholde, a cercaine difci -
pie vvas there, named Timotheus.a
VTomans fon,vvhich wa* a lewelTr,
afldbeleued,&c. ].a.6
Therefore Paule wouldc that he
shouldcgofborthvvirhhim,and he
tookcanJ circumcifed him, becauie
ofthclcwcs which were in thole
quarters,&:c. j.ip.ia
14. And a ccrtaine woman named Ly -
dia, afellcr of purple , ofthecity of
theThyatirias, which worshipped
God,&c. 3*^4 » 3
X 5. And when she was baptiftd,and
herhoufehold,&c 4.16.8
3 3. And vvas baptifed with all that
belonged vniohim ftraight way 4
16.H
37. Then fayd Paule vnto them, after
that they haue beaten vs openly vn-
condcmned, which are Rom.^ines,
they haue caltvs intoprifon.&novr
would they put vs out priuily ? nay
V€rily;butlet the come and bring vs
out. 4.10.1*^
17.87. That they shouldc ftckc the
lord, if fo be they might haue groped
after him , and founds him , though
doutlefle he be not farrc from euery
one of vs. 1.5.3.8,1}
a8. Forinhimvveliue,nndmoue,and
haue ourbeinge , as alfocertaine of
your ovvne poets haue fay d,for we
are alfo his generation. 1.15.5.6c i
1^.1,4
2p. Forafmuch then as we arc the gc-
neratio of God, w? ought not think,
that the Godhead is like vnto golde,
or filuer, or ftone , grauen by art and
the inucntion of man. i.ii.j.
) o. And the time of this ignoraunce
God regarded not , but now he ad-
monisheth all men euery where to re
pent. 3»3-7
3 a. Now Tyhcn they heard of the re-
furrcdio from the dead , foine vaoC"
kea,ecc. 5*^$.^
YYYY iij
)
The Tabic.
18.1S. After that he haddeshorne his
head in Cenchrearfor he had a vovve.
4. 19^2 (S
a?. Strenthening al the difciples. 3.2.5
1^,1. Arvi found certaitre dilciples, &
laid vnt<^ them, &c. j.a.<$
3. V'nto what vvereyebaptifed ? and
theyfi;id,vnt» Iohiisbapcirme.4.15.
8.18
4. lohn verily baptifed with the bap-
tifpie of repentance, faying vnto the
people ^ that they shotilde beleue in
in him vvhixh should come after him
&c. 4-' 5-7
5. So when they hearde it, they were
baptifed in the name of ths Lord Ic-
fus. 4.< 5,6,8,18
6. And P.'Jullaidhij handes vpon the^
cc the holy Ghoil came vpon them,
and they fpake with tongcs .&pro«
pWecicd. 4-?«'5
rj. S > that fro his body were brought
v.C'j the /ickc kerchifcs or handker-
chifeSjScihe difeafcs departed from
t!'tm,and the euii !p. rites went out
of them. 41^.18
13. Thrti certaine of the vagabonde
* Tevves,exorc'ftcs, tooke in hand to
nimeoucr them which had euii fpi-
rites, the njmc ofthelord lerit$,fay-
invc:vveadiurf youby lefi!s,vvhom
Paul? preacheth. 4 19.24
20,1. Nowdfcer the tumult was ceif
led , Paulc called the dilciples vnto
him, and embrAced them, &c. }.a.6
10. But Paulewcnt downe, artd layd
hirnfclfcTppon bim , and einbraced
him,raving:troublenot your fcluc;,
• for his hfe IS in him. 4. 15). 19
Wherefore from Miletum he fent
»7-
CO S-^hefus , and called the ciders of
tht Church. 4.J.8
jg: Ye know from the firft day that I
circle to AfTa, after whac manner I
hatichin vvich You«t al rearons.4.5.7
§ "5 And hovve 1 k^pt backe nothingc
' th^t was profitable, but haue she-
wed 'you,& taught you openly, and
throughout euery houfe 4 1.22.& 4
ii. VVitneffing bothtochcIcvvesSc
to the Grecian? , the repentance to-
ward God , and faith tovvardes our
Lord lefus Chrilt. 3.».i.& }.§.2,5
26. Wherefore I take you to record
this day, that I am pure from the
blood of jU men. 4.4.3.&4.1 i.x
18. Take hecde therefore vnto your
felues , and to all the flocke,vvhcrc-
of the holy Ghoit hath made you o-
uerfe;.rs,to Rdc the church of God,
wliichhehath purchafed with his
ovvne blood. 2.14. 2.& ?.5 2& j.ii
8 6c ^^ VII. .'^4: 3.8. & 4.S.8
2p. For lkno\ vethis, that after my
dcpartinge, shvill greeuous vvolfes
enter in among you, not fparingthe
Hocke. 4 P 4
JO. Moreoucr of your ovTne felues
shal menne arife, ipeakinge penierfe
things, to draw diiciples after them,
45.4
jf. Therefore vvatche, and remember
that by the fpace of three yearcs I
ccircdnot to v\ arne cucry one night
' and 'Jay with t'.. ires. 4'3-^
j(f. And when he na^ thus fpoken,he
kneled dovvne,5: praied with them
- all, 4.1 p.i
ai.4. And when we hadde found di-
fciplcSjVve taricd there feuen daies.
J. 2 6
2 J.I. Y-TTifn , brethren , and fathers,
heare my defence novve tovvardes
you. J. 20.1^
16. Arife, and be baptifed, and vvashe
away thy finnes , incallingc on the
name of 'he lordc. 4.15.1$
18. And I Ta'rve liim,f.nM'nge vntome:
thee quickcly
make halt<;nd gette thcc
outoflerufalem , for they will ifot
rcccauc thy witnefle concerninge
me. 4.17.17,29
25. And as they bounde him with
thongeSjPaulefjid vnto the Centu-
rion that lioode by, is it lavvfull for
yon tofcourge one that isa Remain,
and not condemned? , 4.20,19
23.1. And Paulc beheld earneitly the
councell,andrayd:Men 8c brethren,
" I haue in al! good confciencc feruf.d
- God vntill this day. 3.i7«»4
S. For
The Table.
8. For the 5 adduces fay , that there is
norcfurredion , neither Angell , nor
rpirit,&c.i.i4.^.& 1.15.2.8c z.io.z;
la. . And when the day was come,
Cjcrtain of the Icvves made an adem-
blic, and bound thcmfclucs with an
'oth,raying,tbat they would neither
cat nor drinke , till they had killed
Paule. 4-» 3 J
J14. 1 1, And jchey neither found mc in
the temple difputing with any man,
neither making vprore among the
people, neither in the tinagogues,
norin the Ciiie. 4,20.19
15. And haue hope towards God, chat
the refiitTcftion of the dad which
they thcmfclucs lookc for alfo , shall
bebothof iudand vniul^. 3.3 $.p
x6. And herein I crvdeuour my feife
to haue alway a clere conscience
cowardes God , and tovvard«s men.
^.1^.16. He 4.10,4
35.10. Thenfaid PauJe ; 1 ftand at Cx-
fars iudgemcnt feat , where I ought
to be iudgcd:To the levvcs I haue
done no wrong, as thou very vvell
knowelt. 4.20.15)
II. For if I haue done vvrong,or com-
miitedanything worthy of death, I
refufe not to dy.but if there be none
of thefe things whereof they accufc
ine,no man can dehucr me vnto the:
lappeale vntoCafar. 4.20.15;
»(5.i7. Dehuering thee from the pco-
ple,&: from the Gcntiles,vnto whom
nowel fend thee. 3.2.1
18. To open their eyes,that they may
turne from darkencfle to light, and
from the power of Satan vnto God,
that they may receaue forgeucnelTe
of finnes, and enheritaunce among
. them, which are fan^ificd by faith
>in me. 3.2.1
ao. But shewed firft vnto them of
:, Damafcus,and at lerufalem , and
through out all the coalt of ludea,
and then to the Gentiles , that they
. should repent ,and turne to God,
and do vyoikes worthy amendmee
pi life. 3»i.|
26.1$, And from thence , when the
brethren heardof vs , they came to
meetevs,&c. 4.<J.»7
16. So when vvc came to Rome, the
Centurio deliuered theprilbncrsco
the generallcaptaine,&:c» 4.<>.*5
15. Well fpake the holy Ghoft by
Efaias theProphe£,vnto our fathers.
1.13.1$
ROMANES.
I.I. pAuleaferuaunt of TefusChuli,
called to be ian Apoftle, pufr
apart to preach theGofpell ofGod.
2.14 6.& 4.S«o
a. Which he had promifed before by
his Prophets in the holy Scriptures.
}. Concerning his fbnne lefusChnit
our lorde which was made of the
feede of Dauid according to the
fleshe. 2.1 j.r,j.& a.i4 ^
4, And declared mightely to be the
fonne of God, touching the fpirit of
fandlificatio by the veiurreftiofrcm
the dead. 2.i6.j3,& 4.1^. 2^
5. By whom we haue receaued grace
and Apoftleship,that obediecc mighc
begeven vnto the faith m his name,
among all the Gentiles. 3. 3.(S.& 3.2.
8.&3.a*2^
7. Grace be with you, and peace from
God our father, and firom the lorde
lefusChrift, >> .0 1. 13.13
5, For God is my witncffc , whom I
ferue in my fpirit in the Gofpell of
his fonne , that without ccairing I
no.ikc mention of you. 2.8.27
i& For I am not ashamed of the Gofpei
of Chrift, for it is the power of God
vntofaluation to eueryone that be^
leueth, to the lewe firlt , and alfo to
theGrecian. 3.<).4.& 2.10.3.& 3.2.
2<;.&4.i.J
17. Forbyittherighteoufnes of God
isreueiled, from faith to faith : as it
is vvrittcn,the iuft shal line by faith.
}.2.25,3'«& 5.11J3
i<>. Forafmuchas that,vvhichmaybe
knovvcn of God,is manifeft in the»ns
for God hath shewed it vnto them.
..''..• li,u' -fUO^J .VV5 l.K.I.JI
Yyyy mi
TMc Table.
ai. Becaufe that when they knewc
God, they glorificft him nol as God,
ncithervvcfcthaokfull , but became
vaine in their imaginatros, & c.i. 5.1 z
a». When they profeffsd thcmfclues
to be vvifcthey became fooles. 1.4,1
a 8. For as they regarded not to know
God , cuen (o God deliucred them
vp vnto a reprobate minde , to do
thofc things which arc not conue-
nient. i,-8.»
t.6. Who will revvarde cucry man
according to his woikes. 3.16. 3. &
j.iS.i
XI. For there is no refpcA of per fens
▼vithGod. j.ij 10
12. Foras many ashaue finned with-
out the lavve,shal pcrishe alfovvith-
out thelavvc , andas many ashjue
finned in tbt iavve, shall be iudged
by the lav/c. i.i.ii
1 3. For the hearers of the la we are not
righteous before God, but the doers
of the lavvc shall be iuftifie J. 3.1 1.1 $.
14. Forwhen the Geciles which haue
not the law, do by nature the things
contained m the lavve ,thy hauing
not the lavvc, &c. 2.1.22
15 Which shcwe the effect of the law
written in their hartcs, their con
the lavve faithjit faith it to them that
be vnder the lavv:That eucrv mouth
maybe U<>pped,andall the world be
culpable before God. 1.7. 8 & 2.X0. ^
20. Therefore by rhc workes of the
lavve, shall no fleshe be iultifiedin
his fight : For by the la we commeth
the knowledge of finne. 2.5.6 & 2.
7.7. & j.Ji 19
21. Butnovve isiherighteoufneffe of
God made manifefte vvithout the
lavvc, hailing witneflTe of the lavvc,
andofthePr.'phetes. 2.p,4.& 2. o.j
24. And are itiitified freely by his
grace , through the redemption that
ism Chrilt icius. 2. 5.J.& i 16.5.&
».i7.5& 3 4 3c. & 3.1 i.4,»j>' & }.
15.6.8c 3.20.45
25. Whom God harhfet forth to be
a re<;onciliat!<.n throujjh faith in his
blood, to tl«c!.Jre his righteoufne/Te,
by the forgeuenes of the finnes that
are paflTed through the pacienceof
God. 4-15.}
»6. To shew* at this time his rightc-
ou^ncifc , that lie might be luft , and
aiv.diHerofhtmwhichisofthcfiith
of leTus, 3.11.12, & j.i}.i.& 3 i3.t.
& 3.14.17
fcience alfo be.iring them witneflTe, ij. Where is then thy reioicing? It is
5
and thoughts acculing one an other.
Sec. J «5>.i5.&4.io. 3
15. If thoi: be a tranfgrcflor of the
lavvc, thy circumciuon is madcvn-
circumcifiou. 4.1424
J.4. "Yea, let God be true, andeuery
nianalicr,&c. 4.1 5.17
V Vhat then? arcwcmore cxccllet?
nojin no vvife, for we hane already
proucdjthat all, both Icvve$& Gen-
tiles arc vnder finne. 3.4'6
10. As it is written : there is none
righteous, no not one. 2.1.37 & 2.3.2.
&2.5.J
12. 1 here is noac that doth good, no
not one. 2.3. j
15. Their fccte are fwift to shed blood.
Sec, J.J.J
1^ Nowc we knowjthat whatfoeucr
excluded. By what lavve?of workes?
nay :but by the lavve of faith, j.u
I ?♦& 3.15.2.
4.2. For if Abraham were luftified by
workes , he hath \"*/hcrein to re-
ioice, but not with God. 3.11.1 3. ft
3. 1 i . 1 8
}, Abraham beleued God, and it was
counted to him for rightcoufnclTe*
3.17.8,10
4. Nowc to him that worketh , the
wages is not counted by fauour,
butbydctte. 3.11. 20
5. But to him that worketh not , but
bcleueth in him that iuflifieth the vn«
godly , his faith is couted for righte-
oufnefte. 3.1 1. 5, <
6. Eucn as Dauid declareth the bief*
fcdnefi'c of the man , vnto whom
Cod
The Tabic.
God impotcth rightcoufneffe with-
out vvorkcs,raying.2.i7.S-& 3«*''-4»
20,21
7. BlclTcd are they vvhofc iniquities
are fbrgcuen , and vvhofc iinnes are
couered. j.ii.ii
10. Howe was it then imputcd?vvhen
he was circumcifcd, or vncircum-
cifed?&c. 4-1^.}
11. After he reccaued thcfigncof cir-
cumcKion, as the fcale of the righ te-
ourneile of the Faith which he had,
▼vhen fa« was vncircumcifed, &c. 4.
i4.5,ai,2j.& 4.1^.20
1 1. And the father of circumcifion,
notvnro the onely which are of the
circumcirion,&c. 4.1.6.12
f J. For thcpromifc that he should be
thchcucofthcvvorld^was not gcue
to Abr.ibam,or to his iecde, through
the law, but through the rig^tcouf-
ncffeof fdith. ^14 II
14 For jf they which are of the law,
be hcircs , fa.th is made voide , and
thepromide is made ot noneciFcd.
^.if.ii.d: ? 13 ?
« 5. For the law caufcth wrath: for
vvhere no la vvc is , there is no tranf-
grellion. 2 7.7.& J ii-«i>
17. As it is written : I hasic made
thee a father of many nations , eu;n
before God whom he beleucd, who
quickneth the dead , & callcth ihofc
things which be not,as though they
were. 2 10. 11. & 3.2.15. &}. 14.$
ar. And being fnll certified that what
hchad promifedhevvas ablealfoto
performc. 3>i-?i
J 5, Who was deliuered ro death
for our finnesjandisrifenagainefor
our iudification. 2.16.5. & 2.16.1^
& 2.17.5
5,1* Then being iuftified by faith, we
haue peace toward God through
car lord lefus Chrift. 3.2.KJ.& 3.13.5
j» Knowing that tribulation bringetb
forth pacience,&c 3 8.|
f. And hope maketh not ashamed, be-
caufe the loue of God is shed abroad
in our hartes by the holy Ghoft,
vvhichis geuc vnco vs. j.i.2,& ^.2.1:1
8. But God fetrcth out his loue
tovvardes v$,feing that while vvc
were yet tinners, Chriftdicd for vs.
2.12.4.&2.16.4.& ;.4.2S
5). Muchmore then, being novvc iu*
ftified hy his blood , vvc shall be
faued irom wrath through hira.
1.16.;
10. For if when we vv»re enemies,
vvc were reconciled ti» God by the
death of his fonne,much more being
reconciled , we shall be faued by
hislife. 2.?i^ 2,4,5 8f 2.17, 3,6. & }.
11.21 & 3.14 <S
j2. As by one man frnne enticd into
the world , and death by finnc , and
fo death vvciU oucrall men,forar.
muchasallmcn haucHnned. 2.1.6,8
& 2.13.4
I 5. But yet thegiFtei.«:notfo,as is the
oftence; for if through the offence
ofone nany be dead, much more the
grace of God, and the gifte by grace*
which by one man leius Chrift, &c.
3-54
1 6. Neither is the gift ro,as that vvliich
cnired in by one that finned : for the
f^jult came ofone offence vnto con-
demnation , but the gilt is of many
offences to lultification. ^-i?-}
1^ For as by one mans difbbedience
many were made finners , fo by the
obedience of one shall many alio be
made righteous. 2 1.4.& 2. 16.5, & a,
17.3.& j. II. 4.9,!2,2j.& 4.14.21
20. Morcoucr,thelavvcentredthetc-
vpon,thatthe oflence should abofid:
ncuerthelejTe where finne aboun-
ded , there grace abounded much
more. 2.5.6.& 2.7 7
6.3. Knovvcyenotjthatall we which
haue bene baptized into lefus Chrift,
hauc bene baptized into his death>
4.«5.5
4, We are buried then with him in
baptifme into his death , that like as
Chrift was raifed vp from the dead
by the glory ofthefather,fovye alfo
should vvalke in nevvneffe of life. 2,
|[.3i.&2.]6.7^l5.&3.5,$.&4.i6.i6,
»i«6c4.iyS
The
4, Knowing this , that ©ur olde man
is crucified with him , that the body
of iinne might be deilroied , that
bencc forth we should not Terue
finnc. )-;-9>ii
la. Let not finne therefore re-igne in
ybur mortall body , that ye should
obey it in the lu(le:k thereof 3>3*i|
14. For (inne shall not haue dominion
ouer you : for ye trc not vnder the
lavve, but vniler grace, 3.1^.6. & 4.
15.12
iS Being then made free from finne,yc
are made cbe feruaunts of righteouf*
neffe. 3.<5. J.& j.kJ.x
15. I fpeake after the maner of m«n,
becaufe of the infirmitie of your
fieshe , for as ye haue geucn your
zncmbers feruaunts to vncleaneflc,
and to iniquicie,to commit iniquitie,
&c. J.J4.IO.& 3.25.8
33. For the wages of finne is death;
. but the gift of God is etcrnall hfe
through iefus Chriil our lorde. 2.8.
58,5^.& J.4.18.& J.I4.I1
7,1. Knowe ye not brethren , for I
fpeake to them that knovr the lavve,
that the lavve hath dominion ouer
amanaslong as he liueth? 4.1 5.1 2
J, What jhall we fay then ? is the
lavve {innc?God forbid. Nay I know
not Hnne but by thclavve : &c. 2.5.^
6c a.7.(J
IS. Wherefore thclavve is holy, and
the commaundemetis holy, and iuil,
and good. 25)4
14. For we knowe that the lavve is
fpirituall,&c. %.2.6
15. For I allowenot that which I
do:for what I would that do I not,
> but what I hate that do I. 22,27
1%, Fori knowe , that in me, that is,
in my fleshe , dvvelleth no good
thing : for to will is prefcnt with
nie,&<:. 2.1.9
X^. For I do not the good thing,vvhich
I would , but the euill , which I
would not, that do 1. 2. 2.27. &: j3.11
.ao. Nowe if I doe that I would not.
It is no more I that do it , bus the
'i finne that dvveUcth in me, 2.2.27
Table.
23. But I fee an other lavvc in my
members, rebelling againfl the lavve
of my minde , & leading mee captiuc '
into the lavvc of finne , which is in
my members. 3.J 14
24. O ^vrctchcdmanthatlam, who j
shall deliucr me from the body of this 1
death? 3.^.4.dc j.it.ii.^4.15.12
8.1. Nowe then thereisno condem*
nation to them that arc in Chriit
lefus , which walke not after the
fleshe, but after the fpirit. 3.4.2 8.^
4.1 5.11
J. For that that vras impoflible to
the lavve,in as much as it was vveake
becaufe of the fleshe , God fending
hisowneforine,in the fimilitude of
finfuU fleshe, and fbr finne, condem'*
ncd finne in the fleshe. 2.7. 5. & 2.1 x
4.&2.l5.i,4.aC 2.l6.6.ac 3 2.)2. & 3
4.27. & M1.23
6. For the vvifedome of the fleshe is
death : but the vvifedome of the
ipirit is life and peace. 2.31
7. Becaufe the vvifedome of the fleshe
is enmitie againfl God: for it is noc
fubieft to thclavve of God, neither
in deede can be. 2.1.9.& 3. j.8.& 3.
20.24
5. Nowe ye are not in the fleshe but
in the fpirit , becaufe the fpirit of
God dvvelleth in youibutif anyraan
hath not the fpirit ofChrift,the fame
isnothis. 3.1.2.& 3.J«}9.& 4.17.1 2
10. Andif Chri/l be inyou , thebody
is dead becaufe of finne:but the fpirit
is life fonighteoufncs fake. 2.1.6.& 3,
1.3.& ^.7.24.& 3.>5 3 &4. 17.12.
lu But if the fpirit of him that raifei
vp lefus from the dead , dwell in
, you , he that r.iired vp Clirifl fro the
dead, shall alfo quicken your mortall
bodies, becaufe that his fpirit dvvel*
lethinyou.1. 1 5.18.6c 3.1.2.6c 3.2.39
6c 3.25.3,8 & 4.17. 12
14. For as many as are led by the
fpirit of God , they are the fonnes of
God. 3'i-3?
15. For ye haue not receaued the
fpirit of bondage, to feare agaioe:
but yc haue reeeaued the (pjric of
adoption^
The Tabic.
J.& j.a.ii. & j.i 3.5. & 3. 20.1. & 3.
24.1. & 4.15>,22
itf. Th« fame fpirit b^jreth vvitneffe
with our fpiric , that vvc arc the
children of God. 3- ^-39
17. If we be children ,vve are alfo
heircs , cucn the heires of God , and
heires annexed with Chnft.8cc.2.i;.2
v^. For the ferucnt delJrc of the crea-
ture jvvaiteth yvhen the fonnes of
God shall be rcueJlcd. 3 .^.5.& 3- 2 5.»
»o. Becaufc the crcjture is fubied to
vanitic,not ofit own will, Sec. 2.1 . 5
S2. For we knowcthat euerycrea
• ture groncth v\it:h vsalfo , and tra-
oellcth in painc togcthcrvnto this
prelent. 2. 1.5.& 3.15 2
ij. And not onely the creature , but
vvc alfo v\ hich haue the firft frutes
of the fpirit , Cf.cn we do figh in
our r?luc5, waiting for the adoptio,
eucn the redemption of our body.
3.>8.3.& ^.2^.11
24. For vvearefauedbyhopeibut hope
that IS reene,is no hope,&c. 2.^.3
t$. But a vvc hope for that we fee
not, we do with patience abide for
it. 3 i.4i,42.& ?. 2 f.i
26. Like wife the fpiric alfo helpech
our infirmities: for we knowe not
what toprayas we ought, &c. 3-2C.S
»7. But hethac fearchcth the hartes,
knoweth vvhat is the meaning of
the fpirit ,for hemakcth requertfor
thefiin£tcs,&c. 3.205,34
fp. For thofe which he kncwe be-
fore, healfo predeltinate tobemade
like tothc image of his fonne,thathe
ni!ght be the firlt borne among many
brethren. a.i5.2.& 3.1.1,3 Sc 3.8.1
& 3.1 5.8.& ^.i8.7.& 3. 14,1
50. More('i>er,vs'hom he did predelti-
nate, the alfo he called •• And vvhom
he called ihen-i alfo he iuftificd : And
? Vvhom he iultificd,&c. 2. J.2.& 314
21.5c 3.18.4.& 3.24.^
52. VVho fparednothisovvnefonne,
but gaue him for vs all to death,
hovve shall he not with him gene
ysall things alfo ? 2.14.7. & 2. 17.^.
&3-24-5
J 3. VVho shall lay anything to the
charge of Gods chofen ? it is God
thatiuftifieth. 3.11.3,^,11
34. VVho shall condemne? it is Chrift
that is dead , yea or rather which is
rifcn againe,whoisalfoat thcnghc
handofGod,&c. 2.i6.i ?.& 2.i6.itf
& 5.KJ.18.& 3.ao.»0
35. VVho shall ieparatevs from the
loue of Chrift ? shall tribulation , or
anguishe, or perfecution,orfamine»
or nakednefTe , or perill, or fvvord?
J.I :?,5 & J 2.2S
36. For thy fake are vvc killed all the
day long: we are counted ss sheepe
for the liaughtcr. 3.9.6.& 3.25. j.&
3-«4t^
38. Fori amperfuaded, that neither
death, nor life, nor AngeJls,nor prin-
cipalities , nor powers , nor things
prefcnt, nor things to come. 3.2ii^.
& 3.a.40.& 3.15 8.& 3.24.^
39. Nor height, nor depth , nor any
other creature shall be able to fcpa-
ratevs from the loue of God, which
is m Chrift Icius our lordc. 3.2.16,
28,40
5U3. For I would vvishcmy felfe to
be fcperated from Chrift , for my
brethren , that arc mykinlmen ac-
cording to the fleshe. 3.20.35
5. Of whom are the fathers , and of
vvhom concerning the fleshe, Chrift
came , who is God ouer all blefted
for euer, amen. 1.13.11. £c 2.15.1,;.
Sc2.14.tf
6. For all they are not IfraeliteSjVvhuh
areof ifracll. 3. 2 2.4.&4.2.5
7. Neither are they all children, be-
c.niCe tiiey arc the feede of Abraham:
But in Ifaac shall thy feede be called.
3.2i.7.&4.i<J.i4
8. That isjihey which are the chil-
dren of the fleshe, are not the chil-
dren of God , but the children of the
promifc arc accomptcd for the feede.
J.21.7
II. For yer the children were borne,
& when they had done neither good
nor euiU , that the purpoie of'Ood
The Tabic.
might remaJne according to eledio,
jjot by vvorkes , but by him that
caileth. B'2 2.4
S2, It rvasfaidvntoherjthc elder shall
ferue the younger. 5.2.25
13. Asitisvvrittejhaueloued lacob,
andhauehaced£rau.3.at.7.& 3.22.11
14. What shall vve (ay then ? is there
vnrightcoufncfle with God ? God
forbid. j.2a 8
»5. I will haue mercy , on him to
whom I will shcv/ mercy:& 1 will
haue compaffiotijon him to whom
I will haue compaltion. 1.226
16.S0 then it is not in him that wjllcth,
nor in htm that runneth , but in God
that ihevveth mercy, a. 5. 4, 1 7. &
3 »4.x
»7. For this dmc purpofc haue I Itirred
thee vp , that I might shevve my
power in thec,&c. 3.24 1 4
18. Therefore he hath mercy on whom
he will,& whom he will he hardc-
neth. .i, 1.18 2.& 3. 22.11
»0. But, Oman ,vvho art thou that
plcadcftagainft Go<i?&c. 3.23.1,4
& 3.24.15
II. Hath not the pr-tter power of the
clay to maice.of the fame lumpe,&c.
22, VVKat and if God would , to
shcTve his wrath , and to make his
power knovvcn, fuffcr with longe
pacience thevelVcls of wrath ?&c.
1. 14. 18 & 3.23.1
14. Euen vs, whom he hath called, not
of the levvcs oncly , but aifo of the
Gentiles. 3 24.16
32. For tUcy haue ftomblcd .it the
llombling Itonc. 1.H.2}
J 3. Bcholde, llayinSionaftomblmg
ftoncjSnd a rocke ot utfence. i.i 3.1 1
And vvhofoeuer beleueth on him,
shall not be confounded. i.^3«i}
10. 3. For they being ignoraunt of the
righteoufneffe of God , and going
about to eftablisb their otvu rightc-
oufncfrcj&c. 3'^ I- "J
4. For Chrill is the endc of the lavve,
for rightcoufnclTc vnto euery onp
tincbeUueth. i.5.2,dc s.(.4.6c«>«7«
2.& 3.2.tf.&4.t.I3
5. That the man that doth thefe things
shallhuetherby.3.n.i4,i7.& 3.17. j
6. But the righteoufncfre of faith
fpeaketh on this wife : Say not in thy
hart , who shall afccnd imoheauen^
&c. 1.17.*
7. Or , who shall defcend into the
dcept ? that is,to bring Cbrift againe
from the dead. 1.17.*
8. This is the word of faith which
wepreach. 2.5.12 & 3.2.25, 30.&
5>, Forif thou shaltconfclTevvith thy
mouth the Lorde lefus , and shale
bcleuein,&c. 3.11.14
10. For with the hart man btltueth
vnto righteoufneflc , and with the
mouth man eonfelletb to faluatioi.
3.2.2,8
1 1 . vvhofoeuer beleueth in him, shall
not beashamed. 1.13.11
14. But howe shall they call on him,
in whom they haue not bcletied?&c.
3.20.i,u
17. Then faith is byhearlng,& hearing,
&c. 3. 20.27. & 4.1. 5. & 4.<^'3i.&4.S
^.Sc 4 r6.i9
H.2. God hath not caft away his peo-
ple which he knewe before , &c.
3.22.tf
4. But what faith the aunfwere of
God to him? I hau« referued vnto
myfelfvftucn thoufand men,which
haue not bowed the knee to Baal.
4.1.2
5. Euen fo then at this prefent time,is
the(caremnat,through the elcdlioa
of grace. 3.21.1
6. And if it beef grace, it is no mor«
of vvorkes : or els were grace no
more grace, &c. J'4'5
16. For if thehrftfrutesbeholy, fois
the whole lumpe -.and if the roote
be holy ^fo are the branches. 4.1 6.
»5
17. And though fomc of the branches
be broken of, & thon being a vvild«
Oliue tree, waft graft in for them.
and made partaker of the roote, an4
facneiTcoftheQliueiree. j.t.i
9*» Well,
The Tabic.
to. V Veil, through vabclefe they arc 8.0rhe that exhort«th,on exhortatio:
broken of,and tbou ftandellbyfaych
be not hie minded, but fearc. a.j.12.
t4. Aoaroall Ifraellshallbe faued^as
it is written : The dchuerer shall
come out of Sion , and shall turne a-
way the vngodlincfle from lacob, j .
?.af.
15. For the giftcs and calling of God
are without repentaunce. 4.1 6.14.
31. For God hath shut vp allinvnbe-
leefcjthat he might hauc mercy oq
all. a.7.8.& j.aj.ii.&c }.24.i<S.
3 J. O the depenefTcofthc riches both
of thevvilcdome and knowledge of
God : how vnfearchable are his
iudgemcntes , andhiswaycs parte
finding out? i.J7.2.ac j.aj.5.
34. For who hath knovven the minde
of the Lorde?or vvhowashis coun-
fcller?&c.j.» :|4'&^ 4-i8.i5>.8c 4.1^.1
3 y. Or who hath gcucn vnto him firlt
and he siiall be recompenced? 3.14.
5.& j.2».3.& J.ij.ii.
3^. Forofhim, and through him, and
for him, are all things, &c. 3.8.1J.
I3.i.lbefeech you therfbre brethren,
b)r the mercies of God, thatyegeue
vp your bodies a liuing racriFicc,noIy
and acceptable vnto God, which is
yourreafonableferuingofGod. 57.
I.& }.i5. J.& 4.18.15.
%. And fashion not your felues like
vnto this world, but be ye chauged
by the renuing of your minde , that
ye maye proue vvnatisthc vyill of
God,good,aad acceptable, and per-
fe^^. a. 1. 9. & 4.16.4
3. As God hath dealt to euery man the
mcafure of faith. 4.13.3.2^ 4.16.4. &
4.17.32.
4, For as Yve haue many members in
»ene body,and all members haue not
oneolhcc. 3.i6<i
Whether we haue prophecie,let v$
• prophecie according to the propor-
tion of our fay th. 4. r 6.4. & 4.17 3s.
7. Or anoflBce, let vjwaitcontht: o-
fice:or h« that teacbeth^onteachin
4.J
1
he that diflribuceth let him doic
with fimpliciticchethatruleth with
diligence .'he that shcweth mercy,
Tvithcherefulne(re.4.5.8.j>.8(4.ii.i.
&4. 20.4.
10. Beaffeftioned roloue oncanncher
with brotherly loue : Ingeuingho-
nour,}^oe one before an other. j«7.4,
14. Blcire them chat perfecutc you;
blefle,! fjy. and curfe nor. 4. jo.ao.
1^. DercJybeluued , auenge not your
felues , but geuc place vnto wrath:
forit isvvritten:Vegcauncc is mine,
I will repaycjfayth the Lorde. 4.»o.
31. Benocouercttmeofeuill^butouar*
comeeuill withj^oodnelTe^.ao.ao.
ij.i. Let eucry foule be fubieft vato
the higher powers : further* is no
power but of God : and the l^owers
that be,arc ordained of Gorl. j.i^ i $•
&4.io.j,y & 4 30.4 7.13.
4. For he is the minifttr of God for
thy wealth : but if thou doc cuilf,
feare:for he beareth not the fworde
fornought, for he is the miniftcrof
God, to take vcgeaunce on him that
doth euill. 4.20. 10.& 4.ao.i7.& 4,
30.19.
5. VVherforc ye muft be fubieft , not
bicaufe of wrath oneIy,butalfofor
confciencefakc 3.i>.r5.& 4.10.7.3c
4.30.33.
6. For, for this caufe yepaye alfo tri-
bute: for they are Gods minideri, ap-
plying the felues for the fame thing.
4.20.1 J.
5. Owe nothing to any ma, but to loue
one an other : for he that louethan
othcr,bath fulfilled the la we.2.8. $ j •
5. For this, thou shalt not committe
adulterie , thou shalt not kill , thoH
Shalt not iteale,thou s halt not beare
falfc vvitnertc, thou shalt not couet:
andifthcrebeany other commaun-
dement, it is bteefly comprehended
in this faying , namely: Thou shale
loue thy neighbour as thy felfc. 3.S.
57-
14. But put yc on the lord I«fns Chrift,
The Table,
and take no thought for the flcsh,to
fulfill the hifles of it. ^.i.i.& 3,10.3.
14.1. Him thatisvvcake in the fayth,
rcceaue vntoyou , but not for con-
trouerfies ofdilputatioiis. 3.19.11.
5« This man efteemeth one day aboue
an other <4ay, & an ocher man coun
teth euery day alike : let eucry man
b.c fully peiTyaded inhismindc.a 8.
lo. Forvveshalall appcare before the
iudgement feateofChrift. 1. 13.11 &
IX. For it is written I hue jfaych the
Lorde:And eucry knee shall bow to
me, &all tounges shall confeiTe vnco
God. 1. 13. II. 23. & 3.25.7.
13. Let vs not therefore iudgconean
other any more .' but vfe your Judge-
ment radicr in this , that no man put
^iii occafio to fa!,ora ItobiiHg falocke
beforehis brother. 3.i5>.ii.
14. I know, & am perfvvaded through
the Lordc lehis,that there is nothing
vncleane of it fclf : but vnto him that
iudgeth any thing to be vncleane, to
him it IS vncleane. ?-i5> 8
17. For the kingdome of God is not
ineatcanddrinke:butright€ournc{re
£c pcacc,andjoyeintheholy Ghoft.
2.15.4.
aa. H.^ll thou Fayth ? haue it with thy
ielfe before God:bleirc:d ishe thit
. condemiieth not him Ielfe in that
thing which heallovveth. 3. it;. 8.
23. For he that doubteth, is codened
if heeate , bvcaufehe eaceth not oF
fayth. and vvftatfoeuer isnotof fayth
isfinne.5.5.io.&3.i 5.6.&'4,i3.i7.&
4.15.32.
I5.t. We vvhiche ire flrong, ought
to bcarc the infiimites of the vveake
and not toplcife our felues. 3.1 <^ if.
5. Now the God of patience & con-
folat'on , graunt that you be like
minded one tovvardesan other, ac-
cording to Chriftlefus. 4.2.5.
^. Tiiatyc with one minde and with
oneniouth mayepraifc God , euen
the father of our Lordc Icfus Chrift.
3.20.15;. 31,
8. NovT I faye^that Tefus Chriftwas-ji
minilter of thecircumcirion,f<>rthe
truthc of Godjto confirme chepro-
meiTesmaJc vnto the fathers. }.2. j2.
& 4.16.1 J,
I 2 . There shall he a roote of Ieflle,and
he that shall rife to rcigneouer the
Gentiles, in him shall the Gentiles,
truft.
i.!3 13,
1^. So that from lerufalem, and round
about vnto lUyricum , I liauc caul'ed
ti>ab(;und thegofpell of Chrilt.4. 3-. 4
20.Yca,fo I enforced my feife topre.ich
the Gorpcll,not where Chriilwas
named, ficc. 4'3-4«
25. But novvgoel ro IcroraIe,t<Mni-
nifter vnto the Sait>£tes. 4.6.14.
30. Alfo brethren , I befecche youfor
our Lortle lefus ChrilKs fake, and
for the loue of the (pirite that ye
vvoulde itriuevvith me by prayers
to God for me. 3.20. 20.
16.^. Greete Prifcilla and Aquila my
felloYv helpers in Chnlt Iefus.4.6.14
7. Salute Andronicus & lunia mycou.
fins and fellow pnfoners, vvhicli are
notableamongthe Apoltles& were "
in Chrift before me. 4-?'5»
20. The God of peace shall tread Sata
vnderyour feete shortly. i.i4.i8.ac
3.15.5.
2j. By thereuelation of the myftery,
which vvas kept fccrete fince the
world began. a.9-4j
26. But now is opened, and published
among all nations by the Scriptures
ofthe Prophet";, fiiC. 2.^.4.
I C O RI NT H I A NS.
i.i. TjUile called to bee an Apoftleof
iefus Chriit , through the will
of God , and our brother Softenes.
4.3.10.
3. Grace be with you, and peace front
Gi>d our father , and from the Lorde
Icfus Chrift. i •13.13.
j>. Godii faythfull, by whom ye are
called vnto the fellowship of his
fonne Iefus Chrift, &c . ?. 5. f .
1 1 . For it hath bene declared vnto me j
my brethren, of you by them that are
vf the hoafc of Cloe , that there arc
contentions
conteations among you. 4i-'4-
■ X, Now this I faye , that cueryoneof
youfayth,IamPaules, &C.4.IJ.14,
13 Is Chriftdeuided? was Paule cruci-
fied Jor you ? either were yc bapti-
zed into the name of Paulc? 3. 5.2.&
4.15.13.
30. Where is the vvirc?vvhere is the
fcribe?vvherc is the difputer of this
vvorld?&c. 3.a.20.
2 1 . For feing the world by vvifedome
Knew not G id in the wifcdomc of
God, it pleafedGod by thefooIiTh-
neffcof preaching to fauc them that
bcleue. t.6 1,
aj. But we preach Chrift crucified:
vnto the levves , eucn a ItomblJng
blocke,andvntothe Grecians, too-
lishnelTe. 3-24 '4«
a(f. For brethrcn,you fee your calling
how that not many wife men after
the flesh, not many mightie, not ma-
ny nobicare called. 3.2310.
30. But ve are of him in Chrift Icfus
who of God is made vnto vs, wife-
dome and r'ghteoufnen'e , & fanftifi-
cation,&c. 2.15 2. St 2 16.1^. 5c 3.3.
i$.2c 5.4.3c. & 3.1 1. (> 12. Sc 3.14.
17.& 3, 15.5. & 3. 16. 1.
a- a. For I eftcemcdnot toknowany
thing among you, fauc lefus Chrilt,
andnimcruciaed. i.i 3.1 3.SC 2.12.4.
5.6c 2.1 5.2.& 3.2.1.
4, Neither ft 00 de my wordeandmy
preaching in the encifing fpeech of
mans wife dome , but in plaineeui-
denceof chefpirite.i.3.i.& 4.1. 6. dc
4.14 II.
5. That your fayth shoulde not be in
the wifedome of men, but in the
power of God. 3-2.3 5*
t. Which none of the princes of tlvs
worlde hath knowen , for had they
knowen:&c. I.5.i2.&2.i4.i.&4.
17.30.
Jo. But God hath reueiled them vnto
vs by the fpiritc.for the fpirite fear-
chern al things, yea the deepe things
ofGod. I.I 3.14 i5i 3.2. ?4.
1 1. For what ma knowcth the things
The Tabic.
which is in him ?euen fo the thiogs
of God ktiovveth no man , butth«
fpirite of God, 3.2.34,
12. Now vvc haue reccaued not the
fpirite of tlie vvoild, but the fpirite
which is of God , thaj we might
know th^ thinges tlv»t are geuen to
vs of God, 3.2,35).& 4.8.11.
ij. Comparing things (piritu all with
fpirituallchinges. 4.ii(.3i.
14. But the naturall man pcrceauetU
not the thinges of the fpirite of god:
for they are folishnefTe vnto nira:
neither can he know them , bicaufe
they are fpiritually difccrned. 2.a.2C».
& 3.2.34.
t6. por who hath koovven the mindc,
of the Lorde , thtr he might inltru^
him?buc we haue the mind of Chrift*
I.I 3.14.& J.I 3,4
J.i. I geue y®i» milke to drinke , and
not mcate :foryc were not abJe to
beare itmeither yet now are ye able,
3. For where as there is among you
enuying,and ftrife,and diuifions,are
ye not carnall , and walke as mea?
2.5.4.3: 4 I.I 4.
4. For when onefayrh , lamPaules,
an other , I am Appollos , are ye not
carnall? 4-4.2.& 4«i 3.14
6. 1 haue planted , AppoIIo watered,
but God gaue thccncreafe. 4.14.11,
7. So then neither ishe that planteth
any thing, neither he that vvatereth
but God gcueth the encreafe. 1.5.4,
& 3. 23. 14.* 4.1.5
8. And eueryman shall receaue hi«
wages aiicording to his labour .j.
i6.3&3.i8.i
5>. Forv^e together are gods labourers
ye are gods husbandry , and godc
building. 2.5.i7,&4>i.6.
n. Forothcr foundation can no man
lay, then that which is laide, which
is Icfus Chrift. 3.iS.5.&4.5.d,
12. Aad if any man build on tliisfuun-
dati 5, golde,filuer, or precious Uon^s
timber, haye, orftuble. j. 5.9.
1 3 .Euery mas vvorke shal be made ma-
ofaman^faue the fpirite of a man cifcft:for the day shal declare icbicaufe
Ihc i
it shall beereueilccfbythc fire , &c.
t4> If any mans worke that he hath
built vpon, abide ,hcshatl receaue
wages. J S-y*
• 5. It any mas workc biirnc , he shall
lofc,, but he ihali b« Qfe hjm lelfeinc-
uftrthelcH'e yet as it were by the fire
l6. know ye not that yea re the Tem-
ple of God, & that the fpirite of God
dvvelltthinyou. i. j.i j &^3 6.3.
& 3 16.1.^ j 15 7.5< 4 J I.
9p For the wifcdomc of this world is
folishnertc vvith God:foi icis vvritt^
Heratcheth thervifein the'royvnei
craftineiTe. 1.5.7.& 1 2.ao.
%t. Therefore let no man reioyce in
meti.forallthinges are yours 4.1^ i
J^,l. Let amanfothmke of vs, as of ;.hc
mirlifters ot Chrift , and difpofers of
the recrctcsofGod. 43.'? & 4.8 i.
4 For T knownothin^by myfelfc ,y> t
am 1 not thereby iuftified:but he chat
iudgethme,is ti^e Lorde.3.11 2.& j.
17 >4-
5. Therefore iudge nothing btfore
the timc,vntill the Lord come , who
will lighten thingcs that are hid in
d.irkncife , and make the counfcis of
the heart manifcitr&c. ?• 2.4.
f. For who fcperatcthihec? & what
haft thou, that thou h.< ft not rccea-
tied?if thou hail receaued it,why re-
ioyceft thou, as though thou haddcft
notrcceaucdic? 1.5. a & j.7 4.& 3,
?,4 12.
t.$- ForinChriftTefu<: Ihaucbegorien
you throuiiih the Gofpcil. 4.1.6.
5.1. It IS heard certainly that there is
fornication smog you, acidfuch for
nrc^i'oo asis not once named amog
thcGentiles&c. 4.1. 14.
1. And yearc puffed vp and haue not
rather lorrovyed , that he which
hath done this deede, might bee put
from among you. 4.115.
4. When ye are gathered together,
and my fpirite, »n the name of our
Lordc ic(us Chrift.that, fuch a onc»
I fay; by the povvw ofour Lard lefus
able.
^ hrift, 4.ii.5.8r4i2.4
5. Bedeliuered vntoSacan ,forthede-
ltru(^ion of the flesh, that the fpirit*
may be lauedin the day of the Lord
Icfus. 4.1 > 5.^.
6. know ye not that a litlelcaueojlea-
uencih the whole lumpt? 4.13.5*
7. For ChriftourpaflcouerisfacriHced
for vs. 4.1 J. I J. & 4.18 }
if If any that is called 2 brother, bee
a h>rnicator,orcouctous, or an ido-
later ,or a ra}ler,or a (drunkard , or an |
extortioner ,vvich fuch a one eate i
not. 4.i.i;.& 41 1.5. I
I J, For whath.Tue I to doe,co iudgc
them alfo, which are without ? doc
ye not iudge them that arc within?
4.U.?.
6,6. But 3 brother goeth to law with
a brother, & chat vnder the inBdels.
4.20.31.
7, Now therefore there is vtterly a
fault air.ong you , bicaulc ye goto
law. one with an other. 4.1. 14. .
^. know ye not that the vnrighteous
shall not inheritc the kingdomc of
GodPd^c. 3.4.21.& 3.14.10.
le. Be not Jeceaued ; neither fornica-
tors, nor idolaters , nor adulterers,
nor wantons, nov buggerers, nor ^
thcues,nor couetous,nordrunkardc$ "
nor rjilers,nor extoi tioners shal in •
htrite the kingdom of God. 34.31,
II But ye are niftified in the name^f
the Lc»rde Ietus,and by the fpirite of >
our God.i. 13 14.& 3.1.1. & 3.tf.3.&
3.14.6.& ?.34 10.
13. Mcates are ordained for thebellye,
& tht bf lly for the mcates ; bat God
shall deltroybothit , and them,&c.
3.25.8 & 4.1 3.9& 4'«3>.7.
15. know ye not, that your bodies are
members ofChrift?&c. 3.6. 3. & 3.35.
8.&4.i7.5>.
tp know ye not , that your bodye is
the temple of the holy Gholt,whioli
is in you, whom you haue of God?
&c. X.13.15.& j.j.J.Sr 3 15.7.5: 3.
25. 8. & 4.3.1.
30. For ye are bought for a price:there-
fore glorifie Goi in your body , and
in your
The
in your Cp'mt : for they are Gods . a.
17. 5. & 3.a5 7
7. 1. Neuerthclcffe , to auoide forni-
cation, let cuery man haue his wife,
and let euery woman haue her own
hul'band. a.S 4;
3. Let the huf^and geucvnto the wife
duebencuolcnce , and likcvvife alfo
the wife vnto the hiifband. 4.1 2.1 <(
5. Defraude not one an other , except
it be with confent for a time, that ye
may gcue your felues ro failing, and
praier : and againe come together
that "Satan tempt you not for your
incontinencie. 4. 12. {6
7. I would that all men were euen as
T my (clfe am : but euery m.m hath
his proper gifr of Ciod,one after this
maner , and an other after that. 2.
8.42
5>. But if they can not abltaine,let them
marry: for itis better ro marry then
toburne. 2.8.4?.tk 4.1 j 17
14. For the vnbeleuiiig hufband is
fandtified by the wife, and thcvnbe-
leuingwife is fandiHed by the huf-
band , els were your children vn-
clcanc : but nowc are they holy. 2. i
7 & 4.id.6.& 4.i<» i5.&4.i<. 31
15. Circumcilion is nothing , and vn-
circumcifion is nothing : but the
keeping of the commaundements of
God. 414.24
ai. Art thou called being a fcruaunt?
csrenotfor it; butif yetthoumaieft
be ft-ee,vfe it rather. 4.20.1
13. Ye arc bought v vith a price:bc not
feruauncesofmen. 4.20.32
31. And they that vfe this world ,as
though theyvfed it not: for the fa-
shion of this world goeth away. j.
io.i,4.& 4.15.7
34. The vnmarricd vvoman careth for
the things of the lorde , that she may
be holy both in body & in fpirit,&c.
2.8.43
3 5. And this I fpcake for your owne
commodities , not to tangle you in a
inare,&c. 4.10.2
8.1. And as touching things facrificcd
vnco idolcSjYve knovvc,that we
1 able;
haueknowIedge,&c. 4.10.2a
5, For though there be that are caU
led Gods , whether in heauen , or in
carth,&c. 1.13.H
6. Yet vnto vs there is but one God,
which is the father , of whom are
all things , and we in him : and one
lorde lefus Chrifl,&c i.ij.ji.,^ 2.3.
6.& 2.14. J. & a.i 5.5
$. Butrake heedclcfte byany meanes
this power of yours bee an occafion
offaliing to them that are weake. 3.
I5>.il.&4.'0.22
5, 1. Am I not an ApoAle r am 1 not
free ? haue I not feene lefus Chrifi
our lonle ? arc v-' not my works in
the lorde } 3 '415 & 4-1 1 4* & 4 17.
1.7 .& 4. 17.29
2. For ye are the fcalc of my Apoftle-
ship in the lorde. 4. i.<J
5. Or hane we not pnwer to leade
about avvife being a fiUcr,as well
as the reftc ot the Ap( files ,and as
the brethren of the lorde, and Ce-
phas? 4.12.25
12. Ncuertbeleffc , we haue not vied
this power ; but fi'fftr all things,
that we ihouid not hinder the Gof.
pell of Chri/l. 31415
J 6. . And woe is vnto me , if I prca h
not the Gofpell. 4. 3.<f
15>. For though I be free from all men,
yet banc T made my fclfe feruahnt
vnto ill men, chat 1 might vvinne the
more. 3 19. 12
20. And vnto the levvcs I become ;is
a levve , that I might vvinne ti e
Iewts,&c. 4.1^.26
22. To the vvcake Ibecomcas wtake,
that I may wmnc tht vvtakc : 1 am
made all things to <ill men, that I
might by all meanes faue fomc. j .
I5>.12
1 0.1 Moreoucr, brethren I would n(!t
that ye >houldbe ignoraunt , that
all our Fathers were vnder the
cloude , and all paiied tiorough the
fca. 21-05
a. And were all baptized vnto Mo-
fcs , in the cloud , and in the Tea.
zzzz
^ . And did all cite the fame fpirituail
rncate. 4 14.2 j.& 4.18.20
4. And did all drinke chc fame fpiritnall
drinke , for they drankc of the fpi-
rituail rocke that followed them;&
thcrocke was Chrift.i.i3.io.& »,<?.
I.& 4.14. 26.& 4,17.15,21,22
5. But with many of them God was
not pleafed : for they were oucr-
thovvenin thevvildernefle. 4.14,24
II. And all tbefe things came vnto
them for enramplcs,& were written
CO admonishe vs , vppon whom the
cndcs of the world are comc.i.io. 5.
6c 3 . 2. 2 2
ij. Wherefore let him that thinktth
he ftandcthjLc^c hccde lelt he fall. 3.
2.40. & 3.24.6
1 3. There hath no tentation taken you,
but(uchasappearethcoman,&c. 3.
20.46
1 6. The cuppc of blcffing which we
blefle , is it not the communion of
the blood of Chnft ? the breadc
which vve brcake , is it not the co-
munion of the body of Chrift? 4.17.
10.& 4«i7.i5.& ^.ly.zi. 8c 4*17. iS.
& 4.18.8
17. For vve that are many , are one
bread and one body , becaufe wc
all are partakers of one breadc. 4.
17.14
23. All things are lawfull forme,but
ail tilings are noc expediet all things
are lavvj-uli for me , but all things
cdificnor. 3-'^i»
■i$. VVhatfoeuer is lolde in the sham-
bles , eate yc , nnd afke no quedion
for confcicn e f.<ke. J.ip.n
28, But if any man fiy vnto you, this is
facrificcd vnto idoles , eate it not,
becaufe of him that shewed it , and
for thy confcience, &c. 3.1 5.« 5,2c
4.104
2$. And the confcience I fay,not tiu'ne,
butof thatotiicr ,&c. 3.i5.ii.ec4.
J0.4
31, Whether therefore yc eate or
drinke, or vvhatfoeuer yc do, do all
to the glory of Ood. 3.2^.44
'32. Gcuc none gffeuce , neither to the
1 aoie.
le wes , nor to the Grecians , nor to
the Church of God. J-'iJ.ii
11*4. Euery man praying or prophe*
eying hauing any thing on his head,
dishonoreth his head. 4.19.2^
5. Bjt cuery woman that praieth or
prophecieth bareheaded, dishonor
reth her head. 4.10. 29
7. For a man ought not to coucrbis
head:forafmuch as he is the image
and glory of God : but the woman
is the glory of the man. >»M«4
1 6. But if any man lufl; to be conten-
tious , vve haue no fuch cuftome,
neither the Churches of God. 4.10.31
»o. When ye come together there-
fore into one place, this is not to eate
thelordes fupper. 4.1^^.1^
21. Haue ye not houfes to eate and
drinke in ? defpife ye the Church of
God,&c. 4.10.25
2j. For I haue rcceaued of the lorde
that which I alfo haue deliuered
vntoyou,&c. 4'*7«35,50
34. And vvhenhehadgeuenthankes,
he brake it,and faid,Take, eate : this
is my body , which is broken for
you:thisdoyou inremembraunccof
me. 4.17.1.& 4.17. 20
25. After the fame maner alfo hetookc
the cup,vvhen he had Tupped, faying:
this is the nevvc Teltament in my
blood, &c. 4'i7.20
26. For as often as ye shall eate this
bread, and drinke this cup.yc shcvvc
the lordes death vntiil hee come. 4.
i6.3o.&4.t7,j'7
a?. Let a man therefore examine him-
felf, and fo let him eate of this bread,
and drinke of this cup.4.1 f 5.& 4,16.
30.5c 4.17.40
ap. For he that eateth and drinketh
vnvvorthely , eateth & drinketh his
ovvne damnation, becaufe he difcer-
neth not thelordes body. 4.1.1 5. & 4^
i(J.30.&4.i7.3 3,34.40
ji. For if vve would iudge our felues,
vve should not be iudged. 3 3«»8
32. But when vve are mdged jvvcare
challenedof the lorde, becaufe vve
should not be condemned with the
vvorldi
The Tabic.
tvorld. 5.4.J3.& j.S.tf
ia.j. Wherefore,! declare vnto you,
that no man fpeaking by the fpiric
©f God , callcth lefus txccrable,&'c.
2.2 lo
4. And there are diuerfitics of opera-
tions , but God is chc fame , which
vvorketh all inall. a. 3. 6, 9
8 For tooncisgeuenby the fpirifjChe
word otvvifedomc, and to an other
the word of knowledge , by the
famcfpirit. 4-?'''
to. And to an other diucrfiiies of
tnunges,& ro anothct the interpre-
tation of t«)unges. i.ij I4.& 3 ''.9
II- And all thefe things vvorkcth
cuen the fclfe fame rpirit,diltributing
to euery man feuCrally as hee will.
i.i3.i4.&4->3-i
ij. Foras the body is one, and hath
many members, and all the members
of the body which is one, though
theybemany , yet arc but one body:
Cutn fo is Chrift. i 13 i6.Sc i.JS.Sc
J. 1^.2. & 4 17.2 »
13. Forbyonefpirit are weal! bapti-
sed into one body, whether we be
lewes or Grecians, &c. 4. 147. & 4.
15.1 5.& 4.( A.2»
15. Led there should be any diuifion
in the body: but that the members
should haue the fame care on? for an
other. J. 20.20
2^. And God hathordcined fomeio
the Church, as fir/t ApoftlcSjfecodly
Prophets , thirdly teachers , then
the that do miracles : after that,the
giftes of healingjhelpcrsj&c. 4.5.8.
&.4.U.1.&4.J0 4
J I. Butdefireyou thebcft giftes,and
I will yet shewc you a more excel-
lent way. 5 2.p
1 3. 1. Though I fpeake with the touges
of men and Angells , and haue not
loue , I am as founding braiTe , or a
tincklingCymball. ^•5*4
tt If I had all faith, fo that I could re -
moue mountaines, and had not loue,
I were nothing. 3.18.8
J, And though 1 feede the poore with
,all mygoodcs,and though I geue my
boay that 1 be burned , and haue
not loue ,it profitcth me nothing,
4 i:.i5
4, Loae fuffercth long : it is bounti-
full : loue eniiieih not : loue doth
notboaft itfelfc :it is not puffed vp.
9. For vvc knovvc in parte , and vvc
propheciein p.irrc. ;.2.20
10. But when that which is pcvfc6t,is
come, then that which is in part,
shall be abolished. S-^*'?
I J. For no we we fee through a glaffc
darkiy : but then shall we fee face to
face,&c. 3. 22. II. &: 4,18.20
1 3. And navv<? abideth faith, hopc.and
Io«e,eucn thefe three.but the chieft-ft
of thefe is loue. 3.18.8
14. 1 5. V Vhat is it th-en ? 1 will pray
with the fpirit, but I will prayvyith
the vnderilandingairo.&c,3.20. 5.&
3.20.31
16. Bis , vvhen thou bleffeft with the
fpirit, howe shall he that occupieth
the roome of the vnlearned , fay
Amen ac thy geuingof thankes,&c.
3.10.33
2^. Let the Prophets fpeake two or
three, and let the other iuiigc. 4.8.5^.
&4.5>.i5
30. And if any thinc^bereueiled roan
other that ficteth by , let the (uft
holde his peace. 4«i.ii
34. Let your women kfepefilence in
the Churches, for it »s not permitted
vnto them to rpe:<ke,&c. 4.10.2P
40. Let all things be done honeiUy
and by order. 2 8. ^2.& 3.20.2^. &
4.?,io.& 4 10.27,50
15.6, After that,he was feene of moc
then fiuchundrcth brethren at once,
&c. 3,25.5
xo. But 1 labored more aboundauntly
then they all, yet not I, but the grace
ofGod whichis inme. 2.3.12.&4.
i.tf.
I}. Nowe if it be preached , that
Chrirt is rifen from the dead , howe
fay fomc smong you, that there i* no
refurre<aion of the dead? 3.15.7.& 4.
i.14
IZIZ ij
The
1 3. For if there be no rcfurrcftio of the
deadjthenJsChriftnotrifen. J.25.J
14. And if Chnft be not lifen, then is
our preaching in vainc, & your faith
is alio in vaine. 3.^^- J
i<J. For if the dead be not raifed, then
isChnft not raifed. 3.1 j. a
17. And if Chrilt be not rAifcd , your
faith is vaine,&c. 2.1 3. 2. & i.id.i j
i^. Ifin this lifeonely we hauehope
in Chrilt ,vvc arc of all men the moft
milerable. 3.9.6.8c 3.18.4
20. But nowe is Chrift rifcn from
the dead , and vvas made the firit
trutcs of them that flept. 2,1^.1 }
ai. For fith by man came death,byman
~ came alfo the rcfurreilion of the
dead. 2*1.5
32. For,asin Ada all men dy.cuenfoin
Ohrift shall all be made 3!iue.4.i 6.ij
2 5. For he muit reigne till he hath put
all his enemies vndcr his fcete.x. 16.16
28. And when all things shall be fub-
dued vnto him , then shall the fonnc
aifohimfelfe be lubieft vnto him, &c.
».i3.2<J.& 2.8. 30.& 2.14.3. &i.»5.$
& 3. 20.42, & j.aj.i2
3^.^ Thou foole , that which thou
loweftis not quickned,exccptitdy.
3^, All nesh,is nor the fame flesh, but
there is one flesh of men, &C4 3.25.8
41. There IS an other glory of the
Sunne, an other gloiy of the Moone,
an other glory of the Starrcs : for
one ftarrc differeth fi-om an other
Itarrc in ^lory. 4. 15). 3 4
4$. The iirft man Adam vvas made a
iiuing foule : ind the iaft Adam vvas
made a quickning ipirit. 1.15.4.2c
3 1.2
4(f. Hovvbeit that vvas Bot firft made
vvliicliis rpirituall , but that which
is naturall, & aftirvvard that which
isfpiritua!]. 4.16.31
47. The firit man is of the earth, earth-
ly : ihcfecond man is the lorde from
hcauen. 2.12.7.& 2.1 3. 2. & 2.1 3.4, &
4.17.25
50. FIcshe and blood can not inherite
thckiugiiomcofGodj&c. 4.16.17
Tabic.
51. Beholde , I shevvc you a Tccrett
thing , we shall not all fleepc , but
vvc shall all be chaungcd. 2.i6.i7.ac
3.25.8
52. Inamoment,in thecvvincklangof
-an eye. at the lafl trumpet .'for the
trumpet shall bio we , and the dead
shall We raifed vp incorruptible ,and
we shallbechaunged. 2.16.17
53. For this corruptible muft put on
incorruption,8cc. 3«25.7
54. So when tnis corruptible hath
put on incorruptio, and this mortal,
hathputonimmortality,&c.3.2 5.to
16.2. Eueric firft day of the weke, let
cuerie one of you put afidc by him-
felfe, and lay vp as God hath profpc-
rcdhim,&c. I'^-JS
7. For I will not fee you nowe in my
paffage : but 1 truft to abide a while
vvithyou,if the lord permit. 1.17.1X
II. CORINTHIANS.
1.2. (^R^acc be with you, and peace
from God our father , and
from the lorde lefusChrift. 1.1 3.1 3
3. The father of mercie , and the God
of all comfort. 3.20.37
6. And whether we be afflicted, it is
for your confolation and faluation»
which IS wrought in the induring of
the fame fuffcrings , which we alfa
iuffcr: or whether we be comfor-
ted, it is your confolation and falua-
tioi). 3 •$•4
1 2. For our reioicing is this, the teiti-
monie of our confcience , that in
fimplicitic and godlie purenes,and
not infleshlievviredome,&c. 3.2.41
&3»7.»4
ip. For the fcnne of God lefusChrift,
who was preached among you by
vs,&c. 4.17.50
ao. For all the promifes of God in him,
are yea, and arc in him amen,&c. i^^
2.& 3.2.32.8? 3.2O.17.&: 4.14.20
iz. Who hath alfo fcaled vs , and
hath giucn the earneft of the fpirit
in our hearces. 1.7.4.& J.i* J.& }■?».
36. & 3.24-1
23. Nowe , I call God for arccorde
vnto my foule , chat to fparc you , I
cao^
camcnotasvettoCormthus 2.8.24
& 2.8.37
a4. Not that vvchaue dominion oner
your faithjbut that we are helpers of
yourioic,&c. 4'^-9
' 2.6. IcisfufficicntYntothefamctnan-,
that he was rebuked of many. 3.4.1 j
7. So that novve contraricvvife, yc
ought rather to forgiuehim,& com-
fort him , left the fame should be
fvv^ilovvcd vp with ouer much hea-
uines. 4.1.29.8c 4.12. S
8. Wherefore, I pray you , that you
j - would contirmc your loue towards
him. 4-i2i«9
-ji^. To the onewc arc the fautiurof
death , vnto death : and to the other
, the fauour 6flife,vntohFc,Scc. 2 5,5
J. 3. In that yc are manif^ft , to be the
epiftleof Chrill, miniftrcd by vs,and
written,notvvithynkc,&c. 2.8.57
5. Not that vvcare fufficicnt of our
fclues, to thinke any thing , as of our
fclues,&c. 2.2.2 5,27.& 3. j.^
6. Who alfohath madevs ablemi-
nirters of tht ncvve Teftament , not
of the letter, but of the fpirit : for
the letter killcth, but ths fpint ge-
ucthhfe. i.i>.3.& a.7.2.& 511.4.0: 4.
i.<*.Sc 4 1 4. II
7. If then the miniftration of death
written with letters and ingrauen
in Itones , was glorious , fo that the
chil-ir e of lil-aefi coulde not btholde
the face, &c. 2.7.7
, 8. Howe shall not the miniftration of
the fpirit be more glorious? i.p.3
$. For if t-hc miniftcrie of condem-
nation was glorious , much more
doth the miniftration of righteoul-
^ nefteexcecdcinglorie. 4.3.5
,14. Therefore their mindes arc harde-
ned : for vntill this day remaineth
the fame couering vntaken away in
the reading of the olde Teftamcnt,
which vailc in Chrift is put away.
2.10.23
15. But eucnvnto this day , when
Mofes i$ read , the vaile is laide ouer
their hartcs. ». 10.23
^7» Novve Fhelorde is the Tpiric , ao4
1 dDS^.
where the fpirit of the lord is, there
islibcnie.^ 2.2.^
i3. But we all beliolde asinamirror,
the glorie of rhe lorde , with open
face, and are chaungcd into the fame
Image,&c.i,.i 5.4.5c i.i S.5.& 3.2.20
4.4. In whom the God of this world
hath blinded the mindes , tliat is, of
the infidels , that the light of the
glorious Gofpell of Chn It, which is
the image of God, &c. 1. 14.13. &'.
I4.i8.&i.i8.2,&: 1.4.^
6. For God that commaundcd the
light to shine out of the darkencs,
is hce which hath shincd in ouj
hcarts,&c. 2,^.1.5: 3.2.1. &4.i'5«Sc
7. But vve, "a«e this treafu're in earche
vefTels, that the excellencie of that
pow er niight be of God , and not of
vs. .,;,'^., 4.J.5.&: 4.3.1
8. We are afHiftcd on euerie fi<ie,
yet arc we not in diftrcife : in po-
usrtie,but not ouercome of pouerty.
j.8.5),& 3.15.8
j>. We arcperfecutcd , but not for-
faken : caft downe , but we pcrishe
not. 3''S«J8
10. Euerie where Tve heart about in
our body, the dying of the lorde le*
fus , that the life of lefus alfo might
bee made manifeft in our mortall
flcshe. 3,i5.5.&3.i5.8.&3 X8.7.&
3.25.).Sc 3.25.7
I J. And bycaufe we hauc the fame
fpirit of faith , according as it is
written, I bcleued,and therefore
haucIfpoken,&c. 3'3'3.5
5.1. For we knovve, that if our earthly
houfeof this tabernacle be deftroied,
we haue a building gcuen of God,
&c. 3.25.^
%, For therefore we figh , defiring to
be clothed with ourhoufe , which
isfromhsauen. 3 9>S
4. Bycaufewe would not bevnclo*
thed , but would be clothed vppon,
that immortalitie might be fwa-
lovved vp of life. i.x $. 2.& 3.9. J
5» Who alfo hath geiien vnto vs she
tZZZ iij
The Tabic.
earneft ofthcfpirit, 1.9 ^.Sc 3.2.56
d. Therefore vvc are alvvaies boldc,
thwughi vvc kiiovve thdtvvliiles w.c
are at home »u this body , we are
abfcnc from the iordc i.i^.iSc j.i.
14.& 5.9.4 &: ? 15.1. & 3.25.6
7. For vvc waikc by faith , and not by
fight. J. 3.14
8. Neucrtheles , we are bolde, and
loue rather to remoue out of the
body , and co dwell with the lorde.
1,15.1
10. For we mult all appcarc before the
iudgcmcnt feat of Chrift,&c.i.i 3.11
& 1.1 s.; & j. '8,1.6: J.2J.T
x8. And all tilings are of God , VN'hich
hath rcconfiled vs vnto himfelfeby
lefus CbriitjSic.i. 2.2^ & 3-5.5.& ?•
11.4.& 4 6.3
I5>. For God was in Chrift, and recon-
ciled the world to himielfc , not im •
puting their fi»:nes vnio them,&c 2.
12.4. & 1.17.1. & 3.2. ^ 1.& ?.4 3^.&
3 U.22.& J. 14. II. & 4.1. »»
to. Nov'TC then are we ainbaff^dors
£)r Ciinft : 3« «.hoii|jh God did be
fccheyou through v$, 'cc. j 4.27.&:
4 1,12.8c 4-3'«
»i. Forheebaihm.idehimrobe finne
for vs, which kn-..vvc no/itine, that
we should be made the righteouf-
neHc of God in him. 2,16.5 & 2.16.6
& 2.17.2. & 3 5 a.& j.ii.ii.& 3.11.
22. & 3 11.2}
6 8. By honour,& dishonour,byeuill
rcportcand good rcporte,5cc. 3,8.JJ
16 For ye arc the temple of theliuing
God,&c. i.i}.i5,& 5,6 J & j.i6*2
7.1, Seing then we hauc thefc pro-
mifcs , dearly bcloued let vs clenfc
our felues from all filthincs of tha
fleshcand thefpirit.&c. M5.2.& 2.
5.11.& Z-9-i& 3.16 -.& 3. 257
10. For godly rorrovve,caufeth repen-
tance vnto faluation ,not to be re-
pented of. but the worldly forrowe
caufeth death. j.3.7.&3.4.»
11. For beholde , this thing that ye
hauc bene godly forie, what great
care it hath wrought in you,&c.
8. 1 1. Novve therefore performe to do
It alfo , that as there was a readines
to will , euen Co ve may performe ic
of that which ye hauc. 2,5.8
16. And thankcs be vnto God, which
hath put in the heart of Titus the
fame care for you. 2.5.8
17. Bccaufcwc accepted the cxhorta-
tion,&c. a.^.l
^.6.Thathc whichfoweth fparingly,
shall rcape alfo fparinglv^and he that
fovveth liberally , shall re»ipe alfo
liberally. 3.18.^
7, As eueric man wishcth in his heart,
fo let him giue,not grudginglic,or of
neceihciL':tor Godlouechachearfuil
gcuer. 5.1^ J
I a- For theminiftratioof this feruice,
not onely fupplieth the neceffitieof
the fainifteSj&c. 3 7-5
10.4. For the wc.ipons of our warfare
are not cdrnall, but mightie through
God,tocalt, &c. 4.8.^.&4 11.5.&:
4.11.10
6. And hauing ready the vengeance
af;a:nlt a!l dilobcdiencc , when your
obedience is fulfilled. 4.6.3
2. For though I should boaft fome-
wbai more of our authority, which if
the lorde hath geuen vs for edifica- .
tion,&c. 4.8.1
1 1. 1 4. And no mcru.^iIe;for Satan him-
lelfe is transformed into an Angell of
light. f.^.?.S<r4.i2.ii
IZ.2. I knovve aman in Chrift abou«
fourtencyrares agone (whether hec
were in the body , I can not telU
God knoweth; which was taken
vp into the thirdeheauen. 1.5.1.8c i.
4. Howe that he was taken vpinto
Paradifc , and heard vvordes which
can not be fpoken , which are noc
poffiblefor mantovtter. i.i4-4
7. And left 1 should be exalted out
of meafure , through the aboun-
dance of reuelations, there vvas ge-
uen vnto mec a pricke in the fleshe,
the mefl'engcr of Satan, &c. 1.14.18.
& 3.J.I4.&4-I7.34
8. For this thing,l bcfought the lorde
thrifcy
The Tabic.
thrifc, that it might depart c from
me. 1.13.20
5. And he fayd vnto me , my grace is
(ufficient for thee : &c. that the por
vver of Chrift may dwell in me. i. j
I J.& I.I 3.20 & 3.3.14
ji, Ifeare leaftwhen I come againe,
my God debafe me among you, and I
shall bevTayle many,&c. 3.3.1 8.& 4
1.27
13.4. For though he was crucified
concerningchisinfirmity,yetIiueth
he chrough the power ot God, And
vvenodoiit ,areweakeinhim:&c.a
I3.i,&2.i4.6.& a.itf.13
5. Proue your fehies vvhetherycarein
the faithrcxamineyour (elues:knovv
ye not your owne felucs, hovvc that
lefus Chrilt isinyou, except ye be
reprobates? J '2. 3 9
10. /^ccordingetothe powerwhich
theLorde hath giucn me, to edifica-
tion, & not to deftrui^ion. 4.8.1
13. The grace of our Lorde lefus
Chrift, and theloue of God, and
the communion of the holy Ghoft,
&c. 3.1. »
GALATTANS.
i.i TjAulean Apoftlcn<)tofmcn,nei-
*- ther byma,burof fefiis Chrift,
&c. 4.3.1 j,&4-3-»4
a. And all the brethren chat are with
me, vnto the Churches of GaJatia.4
1.14
3 . Grace be with you , & peace from
God the father, and from the Lordr
lefus Chrift, ».i?'i3
6. I maruell that ye are fo foonere-
moued away vnto an other Gofpel,
from him that hath called you m the
grace of Chrift- i-^-^7
3, But though that we , or an Angell
from heaue, preach vnto you other-
wife then that which we haue prea-
ched vnto you, lettehimbe accur-
fcd. 4 9' 1 4
16. Toreueaiehisfonneinme , thtti
should preache him among the Gen-
tiles,8cc, 3«i>'7
J 8. Then after three yearcs I came a-
gaincto lerufalem to viilte Peter^
and abode with him fifteene dayes.4
6.7. & 4.6.14
a. I. Thenfourteneyeres after,Ivvent
vp againe to lerulalem with Barna •
bas , and tooke with me Titus alfo,
4.6.14
3. But neither yet Titus which was
with me, though he were a Grecian,
was compelled to be circmncifed j
ly.iz
6. God accepteth no mans perfone,
&c. 5-23 :'Q
7. When they faw the gofpell of the
vncircumcifion was committed vn-
to me, as the gofpell of the circumn
cifion was vnto Peter. 4«*'T
8. Fcrhe that was mighry by Peter in
the Apoitleship ouer the circumti-
fio,'vvas alfo mighty by me towards
the Gentiles. 4.1. (J.& 4.6.7
^. And when Iames,and Cephas.ani
lohn knevve of the grace that was
giuenvntome,&c. 4*6.i3
14. But when I favve,that they went
not the right way to the trueth of
the gofpell, I fayd vnto Peter before
almen,ifchou,&c. 41a. 3
16. Knowe that a manisnot iullificd
by the v\'orks of the lavv,but by the
faithof lefus Chrift, &c. 3.«7.»
i^. For I through the law am dead to
the la we, and that I might liue vnto
God,&c. a.167
ao. ThusIIJueyet, notl novve, but
Chrift liueth in me,&c. 4.19.^$
J.I. O foolish Galatias, who hath bc»
witched you,that ye shoulde not o-
bey the trueth, &c. 1.11.7.& 4.1.27
& 4.18. u
2. Receiued ye the fpirit by the works
ofthelawe,or by the hearing of the
faith preached? 3.2. 1 3. & 4.1.6
6, Yea rather as Abraha beleued God,
and it was imputed to him forrigh-
tcoufnelfe. 3,i7f>
8. For the Scriptures forefeeing, that:
God woulclc iuflifie the Gentiles
through faith, preached before th<
gofpell vnto Abraham,&c. 3.11.3
10. For asmanyasareof the vyorkej
of the Uvye,arc vndpr the curflfe^for
%ZZZ iiij
The Tabic.
it ii written, curfed is cuery manne
th^t cocinucth not in all things, &c.
x.T.^.Sc 1,7.17 & a.i6.».& ^.11.19
12. And the lawe IS not of faith : but
the man that shall do thofe thingcs,
shall liuc in them. ?.ii.ni.5: 3.11-19
ij. Chrift hath redeemed vs from the
. curfTcforvSj&c. 2.?.i5.& a.8.57
& 2.i<J,2.& 2.i6.6.Sii a.i6 ip.& a. 17
4>& 3.4.27. & j.ii.ia.ijc J. 157.3.
& 4.13.11
t6. Now to Abraham, and to his fede
were the proraifcs mafic, &c. 2.6,1
&a.u.3.6.' 4.14.11
17. And thisi fjy,thatthc law which
was foure hundrech and thirtyycrcs
after, cannotdifainill the coucnant
that was confirmed afore of God in
refped of Chrift, that it should make
thepromifcs ofno ctied. 3.1 1.20
l8.Foriitheinhcrita<c be of the law,
itisno morcby thipromeflc , but
God gauc it vnto Abraham by ^ro-
mes. ?.^M7
15. VVherforc then feruech the law ?
it was adiicd.bacaufc of the tranf
gre(rton,&c.i.i4.9.&3.5 6.& 2.7.x
it. Is the lavvctheii aoainft the pro-
mifesof Cwd? God forbid, &c. 5.11
aa. But the Scripture ha th concluded
all vndcrlinne , th.it the promes by
the faith of lefus Chrift shouldebe
giuen to them th.it beleue. h4-^
a4. VVherforc the law wa^ fchoole-
m.iifter to bring vs to Chrift, that we
might be made righteous by faith. 2
7.2. &» 7.ii,& s.n.5
27. For all ye that are baptifcd into
Chr!ft,h3ueputon Chrift. 2.1. ».& 3.
i.3.&4.i4.7.ac.4.»5-^&4tX^ 2I.&4
19.S
a8. There is neither lew nor Grecian;
there is neithi.r bonde nor free: there
is neither male nor female .• fo" ye are
all one in Chrift lefus. «.i t.ii.& 4
xo,i
4.1. Then this I fay , thartheheircas
longeas he is a childe, ditfereth no-
thing from a feruaunt, though he be
iordofall.2.ii.2.&}.ii«5.&2.ii.ij
I. Bucisvnder tutors & goiveTnours,
vntill the time appointed of the fa-
ther. 4.10.14
J. Euenfo we, when we werechil-
dren,vverein bondage vnder theru*
dimentesof the world. 4.10.14
4. But vvhen the fulnefle of time was
come, God fent forth his fonne, borne
of a woman , &c. 2.1 6 5.& 2,7.1 5
&2 II.II.& 2.IZ.7.& 2.1 }.!.& 2.1 J
3.& 2.i7.5.&4.20.if
5. That he might redeemc the which
were vnder the lawjthat we might
receiuc the adoptio,&c.2.7.i 5.3c 3
6. And becaufe ye are the fonnes,God
hath lent forth the fpirit of his fonne
into your heartes, which crieth Ab ♦
ba,thatis,Father. 1.I4.5.& 3.i,3.&3
2.U.& } 13.5.& 3 20.J7
8. But euen then, vvhen ye knew not
God , ye didde feruice vnto them,
which by nature are not gods. 1.4.3
Hf. i.ia.]
p. But novv, feeingeyeknoweGod,
yc arc rather kno wen of God, &C.4.
1.27.& 4.10 10.& 4.1P.7
lO. Ye obrerucdaies,andmdnethes,&
times, and veares. »-8.JJ
II. I am in fcareof you, leaft Ihaue
b.ft:owcuon you labour in vaine.»
8.3J
J2 For it is written, that Abr;ihahad
tvvo fonnes, one by a feruaunt,an o-
iherby a free woman. 2.11,9 &4.2.3
24. By the which thingcs , another
thing is ment: for thefe mothers, are
the tvvo Teftaments,&c, 2.11.9
25. For Agar or Sinaisamountaine in
Arabia, and it anfwcrcthto lerufa-
lem thatnowis,&c. 3.2. (J
2tf, But lerufalem, which is aboue, \&
free:&is the mother of vs all. 4.1.1
28. We are afrer the manner of Ifaac,
children of the promes. 4.16.1^
30. Put out the feruaunt& her fonne,
&c. 3.18.2
5.1. Stand faft in the liberty therefore
vvhcrvvith Chrift hath made vs free:
&c. 3.ip.}.& 3.i^.i4& 4.10.8.&4
ao.p.& 4 20-«
4. VVho.
1 he 1 able.
4. Whofoeucr are iuftified by the
lavv,ye are fallen from grace. J. J 5 14
5. For we through the fpirKC,vvaytc
for the hope of righceoufnes through
faith. 3'2.4J
€. In Chrift leuis neither circunicifion
• auailtch any thingc,nor vncircumci •
- fion.&c. 5.11.20
1 3 . For brethren , ye haue bene called
vntoiibercy:only vfe not your liber-
h ty,3cc. 3-1^.1*
14. For all the lavvc is fulfilled in one
V word, which is, Thou shaltloue thy
• iirighbourasthyfclfc. a-8.5j
17. For the flcshe lufteih aoainft the
fpii it,and the fpiric againft the flesh,
&c. 2,7.5. & 2.2.27
i^. Moreoucrthe vvorkes of the flssh
are manifeft, which arc aJuItcty,forr
nication,vncleanne(re,vvantonne{re,
2.1,8 & 3.14. t.ci 4,1 s-io
6 10 While we haue thtrretore time,
lee vs doc good vnto all men, &c,?
y.a.ci J 20.j$
14. But God forbid, that Ishouhicre-
ioyce,but in the Croll'e of our Lord
lefus Chrilt, vvherby the vvorlde is
crucified vnto me, and I ynto the
world. z.i<J,7
1 5. For in Chrift lefus, neither circij •
cifion auaileth any thingc,nor vncir-
cumcifion, 6:c. 4. 14.24
17. Fromhencefoorthletnom:jn put
me to bufineffe : for Ibcare in my
bodic the markes, &:c. 3.18.7.5^ j.
25.8
EPHESIANS.
I.2Y^Racf be with you, and peace
^^ from God our father, c< from
the Lord lefus CliriR, . i»J«3
J. Which hath blertcd vs with all
fpirituali blefling inhcauenly things
in Chrirt. ^.22. 10
4. Ashchathchofen vsin him,before
the foundation of the vvorlde , that
vv€ shoulde beholy, &c. 2. 3.8. & 2
6.53. & 2.1I.5. & ».i6,4. & J.J5-J*
& j. 1 7.15. & 3.ij>.2. & J. 22.1. & 3.
23.i2,&3.»4-3-& 3'a4.5
J. Whohathpredeltinate v$ tobea-
dopted through Jefus Chrift vnto
himGlfe.&c. i,i3.5.& 3.I1.4.&3.19.S
6. To the praifc of the glory of his
grace , wherewith he hath made vs
accepted in his beloued. 2.17.2 & |.
2,}2.& 3.11.4
7. Bv whomc we haue redemption
through his blood, &c. 3 4* 30
5;. And hath opened vnto vs themi-
fteryof hisvvill, accordinge tohis
goodplearurc,&c,4.i4.2.& ^19.^6
lO- That in the difpenfation of the
fulnefte of the times, he might ga-
ther together in one all things, both
which arc in hcauen, and which are
in earth, euen in Chrift. 3.i2,5.& 3
20 21
1 3. In whom alfo ye haue truJ^cd, af-
ter that ye heard the word of truth,
euen thcgofpel of yourfaiuati6,&c.
i.7'4& 2-9'^'Sc 2.I0.3.& 3 1.4.& J
2.35 & 3. 24.1. & 3.14.8
14. VVbichisrhccarncftot ourinhe-
ritaunce,vntill the redemption, &c.
3.24 8
17. That the God of ourlorde lefus
Chrift,the father of glory ,mightgiue
vnto you the (pjrite of vvi/edom,&c,
2.2.21
18. That ye may knowjvvhat the hope
of his callingc, and what the riches
ofhis glorious inheritauncc is in the
faincics. 3.a,i<f.& 4.S.11
20. Which he vvrought in Chrift,
whenheraifcdhim from the deadc,
&C. 2.16.1 i
21. Far aboue all principality, and po-
wer,and mi»;ht, & domination>jnd
cuery name that ia named, &c.i 14.5
& 3.15.5 &2.16 ly
22. And hehsth appointed him ouer
all thingcs to be the hcaJe to the
Church. 2.i5.';.&46 9
25. Which is his body , euen the ful-
neft'e of him that filleth all in all
thinges. 2.15. 5. & 3,20.38.& 4.1.10
& 4.17.^
2.1. That were dead in trcfpaffes.and
{innes,&c. 3.24.10
a. Wherein, in time paft ye walked,
accordinge to the courfc of this
fYorlde,and after the Prince chat ru-
The Table,
lethlntheafer^&r. i.i4.tb.&i>i4
i3.2c 2.4.1. & 3.24.10
}► Among whom vvc alfo had our c5-
uerfation in time paft,in the luftes of
our Heshjin fulfilling the will of the
RcihySi of the ininde,&c. 2.i.tf.& z
I. II. & 4.1^.17
4. But God which is riche in loue,
through his great louc wherewith
helouedvs. ?*H«5
5. Euen vvhe we were d«ad by finncs,
he quickened vs,&c. 2.$. 19
4. And hath raifcdvsvp together , &
made v$ to fit together in the heaue -
ly places inChnAIefus.i.itf.i5& j
15.6.& 3.25.1
t. For by grace arc ye faued through
faith, & that not of your fclucs : it is
the gift of God. j.i j.2.& J.M'i*
^ Not of vvorkcs, leallany mannc
should boalthimfelfe. l^h*
10. For vvc are his vvorkcmanshippe
created in Chrift lefus vnto good
vvorkes,&c. a.}.<J.& }.}.2i.& j.14
5.& 3.15.7.2c 3.»3'i}
11. Wherefore remember thatyc bc-
ingintime palt Gentiles in the flesh,
and called vncir cum cifion, dec. 4.14
12. That ye were, I fay, at that time
without Chrift,and were alienates
from the common wclth of Ifraell,
&c.i.4.J&«-5.»a &J.^.i-&: 3. 24-10
& 4.14.1 2.& 4.1 tf.j.Sc 4.16.24
14. For he is our peace , which hath
made of both one, &c. 2.7.17.& 2,ir
11.& j.a.aS.Sc J.2.52.& 3.I3.4.&4
16. And that he might reconcile both
vnto God in one body by the crofTe,
&c. i.«7'i
J5. Novve there fore, ye are no more
ftrangers and foreners:buc Citizens,
&c. 315.1
10. And arebuiltvponthefoundatio
of the Apoftles and Prophets, &c.i
7.1.& 4.2.1 &4.2.4.&4.6.S
21. In vvhome all the buildingc cou-
pled together,grovveth vnto an ho-
lic Temple in the Lorde. J.i$.5*&|
X6.2
3.2. Ifyehauc heard of the difpenfa-
tion of the grace of God, which is
giuenmetoyou ward, 4i4'>
7. Whereof I am made a minilter by
the gift of the grace of God , &c. 3
22.7
10. To the intent, that novvvnto prin-
cipalities , and powers in heauenlic
places,&c. 1.18.3.5c 2.11.12.& 3. 24
iC
12. By whom we haue boldnerfe aad
entraunce by confidence, &c. 3.2.1$
&3.13.5.& ?.20.I»
14. For this cauFc I bovvc my knees
vnto the father of ovu: Lordc lefus
Chritt. 3.2.15
15. Of whom is named the whole fa-
mily in heauen and in earth. 2.14.7
16. That he might graunt you accor-
dinge to the riches of his glory,thac
ycmaybeftrengthencd,&c. 2.12.$
17. That Chrift may dwel in your harrs
byfaith,&c.2.^.3.5c 2,12. 5.8:4 17.$
18. That ycjbeingc rooted and groun-
ded in loue,may be able to compre-
hendewithalliain£les,&c. 2.12.$
& 3.a.i4.& 3.14.19
19. And to know the louc of Chrift,
which palTcth knowledge, &c. 2.12.5
4.2. With longfufferingjfupportittg
one an other through louc. 4. i 2. 1 1
&4.»i.«5
3. Indeuouringetokecpe thevnity of
the fpirit in tne bonde of pcacc.4.1 z
II.&4.I2.I3
4. There is one body, and one fpirite,
&c. 4.i.3,& 4 3.i.&4<5-io
y. There is one Lord,one faith , & one
baptifmc i.i 3.1 6.S( 4.2.5
7. But vnto eucrieone ofvsisgiuen
grace, &c. 2.15.5. & 3.1.2. & 4>^
10
8. VVhenheafccndedvppconhie,hc
ledde capciuity captiue, &c. i.x 3 .11
& t.i6,i6
10. He that defceded,is euen the fame
that afcended far abouc all heauens,
&c. 2.itf.i4.&4.3.2 &4 .6.10
11. He therforcgauefome tobe Apo-
itles,& fome ro be Prophets,&c.4;i
i>5.& 4>34.$c 4.e>.io.& 4*8. IS
J|. for
The Tabic.
Si. Forthfgathcringtogethcr of the
SatnxScs , that for ihc vvorke of ch«
miniftcry,^c. 4* '-5
1 3 Till we all mcetctogcchcr ., in the
vnityoffiith,&c. 414.8
14. That we be nomorehcnccfoorth
chil<iren,vvaueringe &' caried away
with eucric v vinde of doiSrine, &c.
15. But lettc vsFollovveihetruechin
• louCjand in all thingesgrovve vp in-
tohim,&c. a.i6.i5.5f 3.1 i.Sc 3.1.3.
16. By whom all the body being CPU-
' pled andknictc together by eueric
ioynt,&c.- 2.13.1 &4.<5.5>
17. This I fay therefore, and tcftifie in
the Lorde,chac yc henceforth vvalke
notjSfc. 2.3.1
18. Hailing their cogitation darkened,
and being ftraungers,&c. 2.3.1
*o. But you liaue not fo learned Chnft.
'"•^•^ l.u6.Si 3.<f.4
»2. Thatis,th«tyecaftof,concerning
the couerfation in lime part, the old
man,&c. "'■' •'• ' 3.3. 8. & 3.6 4
J3. And be renewed in the fpirite of
yoijr rainde. z.i.p & 2.3.1.& 3.3 8
&3-7.I
•44. • And put on the new man, which
' after God is created, &c. i«i5'4
'a7. Neither glue place to the deuill.i
14.18
a8. Let him that ftole, flealeno more,
but let him rather labour, &C.3 24
10
30. Andgreue not the holy fpirite of
God by whom, &c. 2.5,8
5.1 . Be ye therefore followers of Gad,
as decre children. J-<J-3
a. And vvalke in louc , euen as Chnll
harhloucdvs, and hath giuen him-
felfe,&c. a.i7.5.& 4.1^.13
6. Letienomannedecciuc you with
vainc wordes, for fu:h thinges, 8cc.
3.2.27
S. For yc were once darkenefic, but
are now light in the Lorde,&c. 3 i ^
i.Sc 3.24 10
14. Awake thou that flepeftj&iUnd
yp from the dcade , aad Chriit shall
giue thee light. ^-$'19
21. For the husbandc is the wiucs
heade,euenas Chriit is the hcade of
the Church, &c. 3.^. 3&4<5.9
15. Andgauehimfelfeforit.4.i.i7.&4
8.I&
26. That he might fana!fyit,& clenfe,
&C.3.3.11.& 3.^.3 &4.i.i3.&4.i$.i
&4 i^ 2X
»7. That he might make it vntohim-
felfc a gloriou.^ Church, not hauing.
Sec. 3.3.ii.&:4.i.io
28. So ought mcnne to loue their
wiuesas their owne bodies , &C.4
19-35
2p. Fpr no manneeuer yet hated his
owne flesh, but nourisheth,and chc-
risheth it, euen as the Lord doth the
Church, 4. ij) 3$
30. For we arc members of his body,
ofhisflesh,&c.2.»i.a.&2.i2.7.& j
1. 3. & 4-17-9
3 a. This is a great miftery,but 1 fpealc
concerning Chriil andconcerntnge
the Church, 4.12 24
6, 1. Children obey your parentes in
thcLordc:&c. 2,8 36.& ».8.38.& 4
S0.25»
4. And yc fathers, prouokc not your
children to vyrathy&c. 4.20. 2^
5. Neither is there rerpe(ftof perfons
with him. ?. 23.10
10. Finally my brethren beftronge in
the Lord: S:c. 2.5.8
1 2, For we wrcftle not againft fleshc
and blood: '?^c. I.i4.i3.& 1,17 g
13. For this caufc, take vnto you the
whole armour ofGod,&c. 1.14.T}
&2 5.if
16. Aboueall take the shield of faith,
wherewith ye may quench all, &c.
3.2.21.8c J. 20, IS ,
18. And pray alwaywith all manner
ofprayerandfupplicationin thcfpi-
rit:&c. 3.20.$,& 3. 20.7, & 3.20.IJ
19. Andforme,that vtterancemaybe
giuen vnto me : that I may open my
mouth boldly:&c. J.ao.jo
PHILIPPIANS.
Xii.p Aul &Timothe thcferuauntesof
* IclusChrift,&c.4.5.7.&4.3.8
J ine
4. Alvvayts xn all my prayers for all
you,&c» a. a. 25
6* I sm pcrfwadcd of this fame thing,
that he that hath begon this fame
good work in you,&c.x. j .^ & 3 . 1 8
*0. As Thartily lookefor,aiid hope,
that in noLhingl sh.ilbc a$hamed,buc
that with all confidcncc,&c. 3.2.4}
aj. For I am greatly in dout on both
fide5,dc(iringtobeloorcdand to be
with Chnftj&c. J.y.4
35. Forvntoyouitisgiue forChrift,
that noconely yeshouldcbeleuein
him,&c. i*»7.5
a. 2. Fulfil my ioy,that ycbc like min-
ded,hauing the lame loue,&c. 4.^. 5
3. That nothing be done through co-
tencion, or vaine glory ; but that in
ineekencfle,&c. 3.7.4
5. LetthefamemindebetnyoUjtJ^at
vvaseucnin Chrid icfus. 4»a.5
6. Who bcinge in the forme of God,
thought it no robb6ry,&c. 1.13,11
&i.ij.:4
y. But he made hirofclfc of no reputa-
tion, & tooke on him the forme of a
feruaunt , and was made like vnto
meD,&c.i.i3.24.S: 2.13.2.SC 2.16.5,
&4,i7.25
tk He humbled himfelfc, and became
obedient vnto thedcath,&c.2.i 3.2
&2.14.3.& 3.iS.8,&4.i4.ai
5, Wherefore God hath alfo highly
exalted him,& giue him aname, &c.
a.ii.ia.Sc 2.13.2.^ 2.15. $.& 2.16.15
& 2.17. tf
10. Tha( at the name of lefus shoulde
eueryknee bovv,&c, 1.13.24.& a. 11
12 & 2. 14,3, & 3. $.8
12. VVhcrcforc my beloued , as you
hauealvvayes obeyed , not as in my
prcrcncc,5ic.2.5.u.&3.2.2j.&:3.i8.i
. jj. Foritis God thatvvorkcthinyou
both the vvill,and the deede,&c.a.2
a7.8c2.3.tf.& 2.3.11.& 2.5.II.& 3.2
23.& 3.11.11
r 15. Thatyc may be blameledc,& pure,
f and the fonnes of God vvithout re-
buke,&c. 3''7'»5
t 17. Yea and though 1 be offered vpv
1 aoic.
pon the facrifice , and feruice of our
faithjl am glad & rcioycc with you
all. 3.2.5
ao, Forlhaue no mannc like minded,
who will faithfully care for your
matters, 4.<^'iS
21. For all feke their ovvne,& not that
which is Icfus Chriftes, 4.<5.i5
3 5. An Ebrewe of thcEbrewes , by
thclawaPharifee. 3.2410
(J» Concerning zeale, I perfecuted the
Church,&c. 3.24.10
8. Yea, doutlcffe Ithinkeall thingec
butlofle, for the excellent knovvr
ledge fake of Chrift lefus my Lordej
&c. 3. u. 13. & 3.25*
10. ThatImayknovvhim,& thever-
tueofhisrelurre&ion, &c. 2.16.13
& 3.8.1 & 3.15.8.& 3.25 >
12. Not as though! had already at-
tained to it , either were already
perfed:but,&c, y^_ 4-8 si
13. But one thing I do : 1 forgette that
wl^'ch is behinde, &c. 3.14.J 3.6: j
25.1
15. Let vs therefore as many as be per-
fedjbe thus minded:& if ye be other-
wiie minded :&c. 3.2 4&. 4.1.12
20. But our conuerfation is in heaiien,
from whence alfo we looke for the
fauiour, &c. 3.2$.2r& 4.i7.27,& 4.
»7-*^
21. Who sbalchaunge our vile body,
&c. 3.25.4.& 3.2y.8.& 4.17 2«^
4.3. Yea,and 1 beiceche thee,faithfull
yoke felovv,heIp thofe women that
laboured with me in the gofpell,
&c. 3.a4'9
tf. Be nothing carefal,butin all things
letteyour requeftes be shewed to
God, in prayer and fupplic3tion,&c.
3.20.28.& 3.20.40
12. Andlcan beabafcd: andlcana-
bounde cuery where in all thingcs I
am inllrufted, &c. 3 io.$.c<: 3.15).^
18. I was euen filled, after that I had
rcceiuedofEpiphroditus,&c.4.i8.itf
COLOSSI AN S.
i,4.Qlncevve hearde of your faithiq
"^ Chrill lefus , and of your lou?
tQvvar4alirainccs. &,io..3.& 3-i^'i
S* fop
The Tabic.
5. For the hopes fakc,vvhiche is layed of the Godhead boddfcM 5.1 j.S:
vpforyouinhcaucnj&c.3.i*.3.& 3.
J 5.1.
y For this caufc we alfo , fincc the
day wc hcardc of it , ccafc not to
pray for you, &c. 2.2. a 5»
10. And increafing in the knowledge
of God. ».2.2 5.
12 Geuing thankcs vnto the father
vvhiche hath made vs,&c. j.aa.i.
1 3. Who hath deliucrcd vs , from the
power of darkcncs, &c. i.i5«<^«
14. Invvhome we hauc redemption
through his blood, &C.2.17.5.& 3.4.
jo,&j.i5.s.
15. VVhois thcimageoftheinuifible
God , the firltc borne ofeuerie crea-
ture. 2. a.ao.& ».tf.4.& 2.12.4.& a,
12. 7. & 2.14. 2. & a.i4«5
16. For by him were all things crea-
ted,vvhichc are in heauen, & which
are in earth , things vjfible and inui>
fible,&c. 1.14.10.& 2. 12.7,
18. And he is the head of the bodie of
the ChurcliCj&c. 2.1 2.7.& 4.6.5;.
ao. And by him to rcconfilc all thingcs
vnto him relfc,6cc. 1.14.10.& 2.
17.2.& j.4»7.& 3I5-S
ai. And you vvhiche were in times
paftftrangcrs andenimies , bycaufe
your mindcs.&c. 2.16.2.& ^.1/^.6,
22. Hathhe novve alforeconfiled ,in
the bodie of his flcsh.&c. a.r5. 2.
34. Now reioyce I in my fufFerings for
yoii,&c. ;.5.2.& ^$.4.& 4.12.5
a6. VVhi che is the my ftcrie hid fincc
the vvorlde began:and from all ages,
but noweis made manifcfte vnto his
iainftes.2.7.i7.& 2.11. i2.& 3.2.14.&
4.14.2.
% 2, That their heartes might bee c6-
forted,& they knit together in loue,
&c. 3.2.14.
|. In whomearehidall the treafures
of vvifed ome & knowledge. 2. 1 a. 4.&
2.1 5. a. & 3.2.1 ;.& 2.11.5.& 3 1 1. 1 2.
& 4.8.7.& 4.10 S.& 4.18.20.
S. Beware lefte there bee any man that
fpoyle you through Philofophie,&c.
4 10.8.& 4 I 0.24.
^. For inhini dvvcJlcth allcht fulnts
1 o. And ye are copleate in him, which
is the headof aJl principalitie,and
power. 1.14. ;,&4.5.9.
11. In vvhomc alfo ye are circumcifed
with circuracifion made without
handes,&c. 4.14. 24.& 4.16.11.
12. Inthatye are buried with him in
baptifme, &c. 3.25.8.^ 4.15. 5.6(4.
16.21.
13. And ye vvhiche were dead in
finnes , and in the vncircucifion of
youre flcshe, &c. a-7.i7.
14. And puttinge out the hande
writingeof ordinauces that was a-
gainftvs;&c. 2.7.17.& a.»7.5.& j.
15. And hath fpoyledthej>rincipalli-
ties and powers , and hathe made a
shewe of them openlie,&c. a.i 6.6.
16. Let no man therefore condcmne
youofmcateSc drinkeorinrefpede
of an holy day,8fc, 2.8.33.
17. vvhiche are but a shadowe of
thinges tocome:but the bodie is in
Chriftc. 2.7.16, & 2.8.31.& 4.14.22.
&4.14.2;.
15. And holdeth not the head, where
ofallthe body is fnrnished and knit
togcathcrby ioynrcs,&c. 2.1 5.1.
20. Wherefore if ye be dead with
Chrift from thcordinauaccsof the
yvorld,&c.4.io.j>.&4.io.i3.& 4.1^.7
2t. Touchenot, nortaflenotj&c. 4.
10.13.
ij. Whiche thinges haue indeedea
shevv of wifdome ,in volutaryreli-
gio,&c.4.io,n.&: 4.10.24.&4.1 3. a
5.1. Ifthcnyeberifen vvJch Chrifte,
fccke thofe things vvhiche arc aboue
&c. j.6.3.&4.i7.3<f,
a. Set youre afftdions on thinges
which arc about' & not on thinges
vvhiche are ontheearthe. 4.17.36.
3. For ye are dead, and your life is hid
vvithChriilin God. 2.16.7.5c 2.i6,
i3'& 3-a5««.
5. Mortific therefore youre members
vvhiche ."tre on the caiche,fr>rnicatio,
vncircunucifionj&c. 2.16.15.^
The TabI(X
<^. For the which thinges fjkes the
▼vrathofGodcommethon the chil-
dren of difobediencc. 3.a.27«
_j. Lie not one to an other, feinge that
ychaueputofthe oldcroa,&c.3.}-.8
to. Andhauc put on thcnevVjVvhich
is renewed ,&Cri.i5.4.2c i.i 1.9.81 3*
i 9-
li.VVherc is neither Grccia nor lewe,
circuoicifion nor vncircumcifi5,Bar-
barian,&c. 420.1.
14. And aboue all thefe things,put on
lonc,&c.2 8. 5 J.& 3 18.8.& 4.1 ?•«?•
1 6. Teaching, and admonishinge your
ovvnc felueSjin p{almes,and hymncs
&c. J. 20 32,
ao» Childrcn,obcyyour parcntcsj&c.
2.8.36.
94. knovvingt that of the Lordc,yc
shall recciuctherevvarde of thcin-
hcritaunce,&rc. 3.18,1
35. Neitheris there norefpeftof pcr-
fons. 3.2 j. 10.
4,3, Praying alfo for vs, that God may
openvnto vsthcdore of vtteraunce
&c. 5.20. ao.
17. And fay to Archippus,take hcedc
to thenainifterie , that thou halt re*
ceiued,6(c. 4<3*7>
I. THESS ALONI A N S,
»,i8« TTHereforc we vvoulde haue
come vntoyouCi PaulJ&c.t.
17. i(.
Ijw For whacisour hope, orioy, or
crovvne ofreioycing? 3.25 10.
3\5, Euen for this caufe,vvhcn I could
no longer forbeare , I Cent him chat I
might knovve of your faith,&c. 3.20
46.Sc 41.6 .
12, And the Lorde increafe you, and
make you abounde in loue one to-
vvaide.in othcr,&c. 2.y.<^,
13. To make your hearts ftable , and
vnblameablcin holines before God,
&c. 3i7-»5
4.;. For this is the vvill of God,cucn
your ran6tification,&c. j.i6. a.
7. For God hathenot called vs vnro
vncleaneSjbucvnto holines* 3.1^.2.
& 3.I9,2.&}.2}.IJ>^
15. For this fay wevnto you by the
word of the Lorde, that we which,
liue,and areremayning in the com-'
mingofthe Lorde, shall notpreucnt
thoie vvhiche flepe. 3.} 3.8.
16. Fiir the Lorde him felfe shall dcf-
ccndc from heauen with a shoute,3c
with the voyce of the Archangel!, 8c
with the tr6petofGod:& thcdcjd
in Chrilt shal firft rirc.i.i4.8.& 2.16
«7-
17. Then shall vve whicheliueandre-
maincjb^ caught vp with them alfo
in the cloudcs, tomete the Lordein
theayer:& fo shall we euerbe vvith
the Lorde. 2.16.17.
5.2 For you your fclues knovve perfc-
dlly, that the day of the Lorde shall
cO)r.e,euen as a thefc in the night. 4.
'5>-34.
S. For God hath not appointed vs vnto
wrnth,but to obtame faluation by
the meanes of our Lorde lefus Chrifl.
3.16.2.
17. Pray continuallis. 3.ao.7.& 3.20,
i8.
i& In all thinges geue thankcs/or this
is the vvill of God in Chnft lefus to-
vvardcyou,&c, 3.2028.
^9' Quenchcnot thcfpirite. i.p.3.fic
2 5.1 X.
20. Defpife not prophecying. 1.9.3.
2|. Now theverieGod of peace fan-
£lifie you throughout:and I pray Goi
that your whole fpirit andfoule and
bodic,may be kept blameles vnto
the comminge of" our Lorde Icfus
Chriftc. 3.6 3.& 3,17.1 5. & 3.25.7
II. THES SALONIANS.
1,4, Co that vvc our fclues reioycc
of you in the Churches of God
bycaufe of your patience and faith in
all vour pcrfecutions and tnbulatios
that yc fufFer. 3.1.11
5. vvhiche is a token of the rightcoir$
iudgement of God, that ye nwy bee
counted vvorthic of the kingdome
of God,for the vvhiche yc alio fuffcr
3-»
ThcT
5,a.ii.& 3.18.7
t. For it is a righteous thinge with
God , to recompcnfc tribulation to
chemchac trouble you.j. <)■($.& 3.18.
7&ja5-4.
f. And to you which are troubled,
reft with vs when the Lordc lefus
shall shevve him fclfc fromheauen
with his mightic Angels. 5.18.7.
5. Which shal be punished yvitheucr-
lafting perdition, from the prefencc
of the Lorde, and from the gloric of
his power. j.ij.iz,
xo. When he shall come to be glorified
in his Sainftes,and tobeemadcnicr-
ueillous in all them that belcue (by-
caufc our teftimony tovvarde you
was bcleucdjin that day, $.2$. 10.
1 X . V Vherefore,^ vce alfo pray all v vaics
for you, that our God may make you
vvorthie ofhis caliinge,and fulfill all
the good pleafure ofhis goodnes,and
the vvorkcoffayth with power .2.
5.8. & 3.2.55.
i.j. Let no man dcceiue you by any
meancs: For that day shall not come,
except there come a dcpartingc firft,
and that that man offlnne be dif«.lo-
fed,euen thefonneofperditi6.4.s.7
4> And exalteth ^limfelfe againfte all
that is called God , or that is wor-
shipped lb that hee dothe HtasGod
in the Temple of God,&c. 4.1.1 a. &
4.7. a 5 .& 4.7, a 9.& 4'^-4.
5. Euen him vvhof* commingc is by
the working ofSatan with all power
& fignes,& lying wonders. 1.14 17.
XI. And therfore God shall fcnde them
ftrong delulion , that theyshoulde
beleuelyes.i.i4.i7.& i.j8.a.Sr 1.4 5
I a. That all they might be damned,
which belcue not the truth, but had
pleafure in vnrightcournelTe. 1 . 1 8.2.
&a.4-5-
13 But we ought allwaics to geue
thankes to God for you , brethren
beloued of the Lordjbycaufe he hath
chofen you from the beginninge to
faluation , thorovvc fanftification
of the fpirit, and belsife ol the ^ruth.
5.1. a*
ableT
14. VVherunto he called yon by our
Go (pell, to the obtaining of the glo-
ry for our Lorde lefu Chrift. a 10. J,
3,<f. VVe do commaund you, brethren,
in the name of our Lord lefus Chrift
chat ye withdraw your felues frora
euery brother that vvalketh inordi*
nately, &c. 4.1.2^.
10. Foreucnvvhe we were with yott
this we warned you of,ihat if there
were anie that wolde not worke,
thatheshouldenot eate. 4.i6.a^
12. Thofe that bee fuchemanerofper-
fons, we commaunde , and befechc
for our Lorde lefus Chrift, that they
worke with quictncj,aud eate their
owne bread. . 4. i.2(S«
14. And if there be anie that folio vv«
not our counfcll,note by a ]etter,an4
haueno copanie Yvith him , that he
may beashamcd. 4«»2.5
15. Yet count him not is an enemie,buc
admonish him as a brother, 4.12.10.
I. T I M O T H E.
1.5. TTHe ende of the lavve,i$ loueout
of a pure heart and goodcon-
fcicnce, & of faith vnfained.a. $.6.Sc
a. 8.51. & 3.2.I2.& 3.ip.i^.& 4,10.4
5. knowing that the law is not put
for lult men, but for the lars'les and
difobedient,and for thofe that will
notberuledjfor the wicked,&c.a.
7.«o
X J. 1,1 faye which was firft ablafphe-
mcr,and a perfccuter, andadocrof
vvrong:but he had mercic ofmce,for
I did it ignoratly,not bcleuing.j. j.ai
1 5. Chrift lefus came into the vvorldc
to faue ftnncrs , of the vvhiche I am
cheifeft. a.12,5,
17. To the king etcrnall, immortall,
inuifiblc,thconely wife God,bc ho-
nor and glory, &c. 1,13.11.24.
i3> Hauing faytN & a good confciencc
the vvhiche berg put away ,fome
haue made shipwrackc of faith, 5.2.
13.
».i. I exhort therfore , that firft of all
prayers, fupplications,intcrceirios,&
geuyng ot thaukes be made for all
«60. 3.30. 1 ^.5c 4.30.2 J.
^
a. Forkinges and for all that are in au
thoricicthac vvc inaylcadaquitt &
peaceable life in allholineile and ho-
ncftie. 4,20.5,17.
4. Who would hatie all men to be
faucd,& to come to the knowledge
ofrhe truth. j, 24,1 5.
5, One God & one Mediator bctvvcnc
God .jnd man , the man Chriit Icfiis.
i.ia.i. & a.i7.5,& 3.20.17.20. & 4.
12.25.
4, Who gauc him fdfe a raunfome for
all iT»en, 1 faye Chnft that teftimony
ordained in due timf. 2.17.5, & j. 4,
30.
8. I will therefore that themenpr.iy
euery where liftinii vp purchjndes
without wrath o! doubling j »o,
•2j>.X j.»5 7. & 4.19 2.
j.i. ABishopought to be Tnbi.imca-
ble,the hu^biii ofone wife, watch-
f ulljfobcr, felled, harborous, apt to
teach. 4. 3.ia.& 4.4.7, 10.& 4.5.1 Sr
4. i.a? 24.
^ Holding themyfterie of the fjych
VTithapiircconfcicnce. j.a. i ?.&' 4.
X 5. Which is the Church of the luiing
Godjthc pillcr & ground of all rrurii.
4.1.10 5: 4.2.1.10 & 4 8.1a
16. And without concroueriie gieat
js the myftcrye of godhncill- , God
was made mani fell III flcihe.i ij.u.
& 4. 1 4 1.
4.1. Tlie Ipiritc fpeaketh cuidcntly,
th.u in tbc latter times foms shjl de-
p.irtlrom the faith, and shall geue
nccde to fpirites of error,and to 00-
ftrineofdcuiHs. "* 4 5>-i4.
2. Te.iching lies -through hipocri^e,
whofeconfcicnceis marked with a
hotc iron. 4.9.14,
5. Forbidding mari.^.ge,and comaun-
ding to jbftainc from meatcs which
God hath created to be receaued
with thankes geuing of the faithful!
and of theni that hr.th knovvcn the
trHth. 4.9.* 4,& 4.11.25
4. For vvhatiocuer Godhrfth created
is tjood, nor nothing is to be rcfufed
ifitbe taken with thankes gfcuing.
The Tabic.
5. For it isfanftiffcdby thewordeof
Godandprcyer. 3 ly.S.&r j.20.28.
6. Bfcj,)g nourished vp in the vvordes
of fayih,& in good doilrinc, which
th(»u halt continually fullowcd. j,
2 I {.
8. Btitgodlincde is profitable which
hitfi promifi^of this life & of the life
tocomc.2.5. J.& 3-2. 28. & J 20 .^4.
lo. Theifore we Libour and arc r^--
prochsd jbicaufe we hope in the
liuing God , which is the fiuiour of
all me, but molt cheeftyof the fayrh.
full. }'8 8
1 3, Attend vnto reading , exhortation,
and dextrine, vntiU 1 couie. 1.9 i.
14. Neglti^not the gift that is in thee
vvhichvvas geue thee toprophecic
with layingonof thehandes of the
Elders. 4.},i5.& 4 I <).28
j.5» Let not a widow be taken into
thenumber that isyoun^cr then 60.
y cares oldc,that hath bene the wife
of one husband. 4h9-
X a. Therfore to be condened, bicaufe
thcyhaue forfaken their firitfai:h 4.
I 3.18.
17. The Elders that rule well, are wor-
thy double h()nor,but moft chcefly
thofr that doe labour in the vvordes
anddodrine. 1 8. 3 5, & 4.11.1.
20. Thofj that offend, reproue openly,
that the reft mayefeare 4.12.3.
21. I charpe thtcbefore God 5c our
Lord Ie<uChrift,3nd the clcde An-
gels , that thou keepe theic ihingcs
without pretcrringone before an o-
ther,and do nothing parcially. 1.14.
9.16.& 3 23.4*
22. Lavhandes fodenlie vponno man
neither be partaker of other mens
fmnes 4.3.12.15.
tf.4. He is puffed vp and knovveth no- ^
thing , butdoteth about queftions
andrtrife of words, of which there
rirethenuie,{trife,railingcs,and euill
I'urmifing. ••» J 3*
10. For the roote of all euill is the louc
of money, the which vvhilelt feme
luAed aitcr,they hauc erred from the
f«ich»
ine
faith,& pcarccd themfclujcs through
with many forrovvcs. B'*'^5
1 6. VVho onely hath immortal i tie,
drvcllingin the light that none can
attainevntOjVvhomncucrman faw,
neither vcc can fee, vnio whomebc
honor and power euerlalting. Amen.
l.f.j.&l.lS.J.Sc J.2.1
17. Charge thofe thatberichc inthis
world, diat they be not hie iTiindcd,
and that they put not truft in vncer-
taine riches, but in thcliinnge God,
who ojucth all thingcs aboundant-
ly to cnioy. 31 8.6
to. O Timothe, keepe that thar is c 6-
mitted vnto thee , & aucide profane
and vainc bablings, and oppofitic)ns
of fcicnccfalfely fo called. 1.16.8
II. TIMOTHE.
l.l D Aule the Apoftle of lefus Chrift,
■■• by the will of God, according
to the promifc of life which is in
Chrift lefus, 2.9. j
6, 1 do put thee in remembrance chat
thoultjrrc vp thegift of Godvyhich
. is in thee, by the layingeonof my
handes. 4>3'i^
5. VVho hath faucd you «nd hath cal-
led you with an holy callrngjnocac-
cordnige to our workes, but accor-
dinge tohisowne purpoic & grace,
&c. 1.12. 5.& 3>i4.5 & 3.2i.3i& 4*»
26
10. But nowc is made manifcft by the
appearing of our Lorde leius Chuft,
who hath abolished death, and hath
brought life & immortality to li^ht
through the gofpell. a 5.1.& 3.15.1
11. For the which caufealib 1 fnffcr
thefcthings,ncitheraml ashamed.!
knowe whom 1 haue bclcued,and I
am perfvvaded, he is able to keepe
that Ihauc committed vnto hima>
gainlt that day. j. 2. 31. 3c 3.25.4
14. That vvorthy thing that was co
mitted vnto thee, keepe through the
holy Ghoft which ism vs. J.2.J}
18. The Lord graunt him, that he may
finde mercy with the Lorde in that
day. 3.25.10
a.io. Therefore I fuffer all thingcs for
1 aoic.
the eled fake , that they might alfo
obtainc the faluatio that is in Chiift
lefojvvith eternal] p.lory, 3-5 4
12. Ifvvc be dead v^ithhim,vrc shall .;
alfo line with him: aiid it we fuffer,
vvc shal alfo raigne with him. 3,15.$
13. Ifvvcbclcuenot , yet abidethhc
faithfulhhe cannot deny himfeife.i
4.2.& 3 so. 36
16. Stay profane bablmg about vainc
things, for they vvil prucede to niore
vngoJlincs. 3'2.i3
1^ The foiind;»tion of God ftandeth
fure , hauiiigc this feale , The Lorde
knovvcth who be his, &c. 3.22.6.
6(4.1.2,8
iO. In a great houfe there be not on-
ly golden and filuer veflels , but alfo
of woodc and of earth, and feme of
them be to honor , andfome to dif-
honor. 3'=5'8
2 5. laltruft tliCm with raeckenc* that
are conrrary minded. if thar God vvil
giucthcni at any time repcntaunce,
that they may knowe the tructh.1.14
18.& ^.3.2i.& 3.24.15
26. And thar they which betaken in
the fn irc of the dcuill, in the which
they be hcldc captiue, may, &c 1.14
18.& 3 3.21
3.7. Euer learning. but they canncuer
Come to the knowledge of the truth.
3.2.5
8. And as Tannes and Ian brc? vvith-
ftoode Mofes,fo rhey vvithiland the
truech, men cornipr in mindp , &' re
probate touchms the faith 3.2- » 3
16. The whole Stripiuicis giuenby
infpiration of God, and is profitable
toteach, to rcpr^ue, and to ctrretS,
&c. I.^.I,&2 7.»4
17. That the man of God may be pcr-
fed, being perfe<9^1y inftru^cd n:- e
uery good vvorke. i.p.i
4.1. 1 cJ'argir thee therefore befute
God,& before the lord lefns Chrift,
vvhosh.iU iudgethe ipickcand the
dead at his glorious comminginhss
kingdom. 2.16.17
8. It remainethjthat there is a crown
Uidvp for me, whirh the Lord that
A AA AA
The Tabic.
righteous iudge shall gluevntamc
inthatda^. ' 3.i«J.5.& 5.154
i6. Atmyhrft anfvvfringno manaffi-
itedmejbutallforfookcmc. 4.^.1^
TITVS.
l.r.pAuI a fcruaunt of God, and an A-
* poftle of lefus Chrill according
to:hefaichoftheclc(aof God, and
knovvlcugeof the trueth,vfhich is
accordrngeroholindl*. 3.>.ia.& |
ai.io
5. Forthiscaufcl left thee in Creta,
thacthcu shouldclt go forwards t«
amende thofc ihingcs that rcmainc,
Sc that thou shouldcrt appoint cucry
where Elders, ai I hauc commaudcd
thee. 4.j.7,S,i5
6. Ifany beblamelcfTc.lettcit bcthc
husbandeofone vvife,hauingcchil-
drca chat be faithfull,&c.4. j- 1 3.&4
7. ABishoppe muft be blamelc/Te, as
the Ite ward of God, &c. not greedy
offilthyJukcr. 4-5'i9
5. A holder of that faithful] wordc
Tvhich ferueth to teach, that he may
exhort by found dodrinc,^ confvte
chem chat fpeake thcrcagainfl. 4.3.^
13. Thiswitncsistrucivvhereforcrc-
prouc ihcm earneltly, that th«y may
be found in faith. 3^*)
1 5. All chinges is pure to the purc:buc
to the denied &fajthIeflc,nochingi$
pure,&c. j.i^.9.8c4.i3.9.&4 17.40
t,2. That old men be fobcr, shewing
thsfelues worthy to be rcucrenccd,
and te(nperacc,foundeinta^ch,loue,
and patience. 3».i3
II. For the grace of God that bringeth
lalaation to all men hath appeared.
a.i«.4.& J.7.J.& j.itf, J.&4.r.i6
i». Ifeachingvs, that vvickedncs be-
ing forfaken and worldly luftes, vvc
should liuc foberly,righteoufly , and
halily,in thispiciVnt life, ^.i 6.1.8c ^
25.1
13. Looking for that ble (Ted hope, and
for that glorious comminge of the
glory of that great God & Sauiour e-
uenChrift leiuj. 3-5> 5.& j.itf »
3.1. Put thtioin minde that they be
fubiedto principah'cies , tlndobef
powers, that they be prepared toe-
uerygoodvTorkc. 4.20.23
4. But when the bountifulnes & louc
of God our Sauiour tovvardesman
appeared. J.5.i7,& 3.14.5.& 4.1.96
5. Not by the vvorksof rightcoufncs
that we had done^but according to
bis mercy he faued vs , by the vv«.i
shingeof regeneracion,&c. 1.13.1 4
& a.5.i7.& 3.4.a5.& 4.15. 1,5. &4
i6.ao.& 4.i7.a»
7. That beingc iuftified by his grace,
▼ve should be made heires according
tothe hopeofeternall life. 3.1 5.*
9. But ftay foolish queftions&genea
logies,2c contentions, & bravvlings
about the law, for they arc Tnprofa-
cable and vaine. 2.1 2. 5
HEBREVVES.
i.i.^ Od many times & diuerfly fpakt
^ to the fathers by the Prophets,
a.9.t.&2.i^.i.& 4.8.7
a. Inthefe latcrdaieshefpaketo vsby
his fonne. i.i ).7.& 4.S.7.& 4.18.20
3. Who being the brightncfle of his
gIorv,and thcingraued forme of his
perron,and bearcth vpall rhingcs by
his mighty worde, hath by himfelfs
purged ourfinneSjSrc.i.i 3-2,ia.&i
\6.if..Sc 2.2.ao.& 2.T4. 3
4. Being made fo much more excellent
then Aogels,by hovvcmuch he hath
obtained a more exceiient name, i
14 y '
4. Let ail the Angels of God worship
him. 1.13.11,23
10. And thou, O Lorde,in the begin-
ning hid laid the foundations ofthc
earth: and cheheauens be the works
ofthyhandes. 1. 13.11, 23, 3<(
14. Be thcynot all miniiiiinge fpirites
fent forth to miniller for theirldkes
that shalbe heires offaluacio? i.i4-P
& 3,20. 2-J
2.5. He hath not put infubie^ion to
the Angells , the world to come, of
which we fpeake. ''M-^
5. But we fee lefus crovvvned with
gloTV and honor , which was mad«
a litlc vvhiie infefiovur to Angels , by
rcafoB
inc labic.
reafon of fufferinge death , that by 5. And fo Chrift tooke not to himrelffC
Goris grace he might tail of death
forallmcn. i.i?.26.& 1,16,7
l,j. For he that fan fti fie ih , and t bole
chat arc fanaificd , are all of ont :
vvhcrcforchcis not ashamed ro calj,
thtm brethren. a 1 3 1
14. That he might deftroy throughf
deach , him that had the empire and
poTver of death, thacis, the dcuill,
&c. 1.14 iU.i5t a 15 I.1.& 3 »«.?4.
1 5. And that he might dcljiier a' them,
vvhich for teare of death were all
their life time lubiei^ to btiiidage.a
16. For in tiovvife hetooke the An-
gels, but he tooke thefccdcof A-
braham. i,t4>.i>-& *.» J«i,a
17. In all chinges it became him to be
made like to his brethren, th^ihc
might be merciful!, audafaithFufl
chishonor^tciben^ade hit;prici^,dfc.
••- , , .. -, 4.14 2r.&4.j8.»
6. Thou art a^prieft for euer, after the
order of Mekhif«idec. a^.x^.iZ,
7. VVhichin the dayesofhis flesh tjid
offer vppe prayers and Supplications,
with hroi>g cryingc and tcarcs vnt©
him, that vvas able tQ fawihimirotn
death i and was alfo heardcin thac
vyhich he feared. 2.1 6. ix
8. Although he Were thefonne, not-
vvithHandmg he'learned obedience
by thofc things that he fuftrcd. j,8.i
10. And called of God an hie prieil^af-
cer the orjder ofMel^bifcicc. 4.18.1
^.4. Foritca not be that thofe which
vvcrcoiicc lightened , and haue ta-
iled of the htaucniy eiftes,and vvie;r«
roade,p;)i;tfd(Qi-$ of theholy Gholt |.
2.1i.& 5.5.i1,2J
high pjicft in thingcs concerninge 6. If they fall, that they should be te-
Gpd. J.I?. 1. 2^ 2.i<5 .2,<5
3 14. V Ve be made partakers of Chuft,
ifwckecpe fiire vnto tbeciide that
heginningc vvhercwuh wc arc v^)-
holden. j. 2.16.
4.5>. There rcmaineth therefore a relt
to the people of God. a.8,29
14. Hauinge therefore a greac high
prie(l,that hath enticd into hcaucn,
euen lefus the fonne of God , let v$
. hold this profeflion. 1.7 2.& 4.14.11
15. We haue not ahic priclt th.Tt can
not be touched with the mfirmicic
of our flcshe , but wa* in all thtngcs
teptcdin like fort, yet withtjut lin.
i.»a.i,7-&: a.i3.i.&2.i<5.J2.&4,i7. 24
\6. Lettevsapprochc therefore vvich
boldnes vnto the throne ol grace, that
Tvc may rccciue mercy, & hnde grace
tohclpcattimcofnedc. 5.^0.11,17
},i> Eticry hie priefl is taken from a*
mongeil me, & is ordained for men,
in things pertaining to God, that he
may offer both gifts and facrifice for
Hnnes. i.i}^4
4. Neither doth any man take this hp^
nor vnto himlelfc,but he that is cal-
led of God,aft was Aaron.4. 3.10 &4
ftj.a».&4.i8.^,i4
....»■#
Bucd againe by repentaccj&c.J.j.ii
10. For God is not vni.uU , that he
sfiould forget your Tvorkcs, and la-
bour of loue, which ye shewed to-
vvaids his nam^j&c. 318.7
13. For yvhen God made the promife
to Abraha , when a$h<: c*>uldefwere
by none greater, he fwore byhirofelf.
2.8.2$
16.. For men verily fvvcarcbyhiiri that
is greater th«n thtnifelues, & an oth
for confirmation is an cndeof flrife
amoHgcft them. 28.27
7.3. VVithout father, without mo-
ther,vvithouc kindred, and hauinge
neither beginningcot his dayeSjUor
cnde of his life, but is likened to the
fonncofGod,and continnethaprieft
for eucr. , , , .. 'd,,\s 1%
7. But without all controiieriie,that
which istheltaltis blcfl"ed«f hira
thaj is thegrieatcr. 4.i?.»
II. Ifthere had bin a ful perfeSion by
the Leuitical pricffhot>d,&c. 2.11,4
\%, The Prieftoooiie thereforcbeingc
chaungedjit muff nedes be, chat there
beachauge of the havv'.3.4 4.&4 6,»
»7. Thou ar.t a pneff for eucr,after the
order of Melchifedec. j 4. iS.A
A A AAA ij
w
1 nc
f^ Thclavtrc^n^ific^ nothinge, but
the brin|:;iijg in of a better hope did
It > by the which we come necre to
God a.7.i7.& a.11.4
31. But this, he is made with an othc
by him thacfaid vntohim,The Lord
hat'n fvvorne and will not repent,
thouart apneftfor cuer,&c. 4.18.1
21. lefus is made fo* much greater
furctyofa better Tcftamcnt. 4.18 2
24. And hcjbecaufe he abideth for euer,
hath anciieriaftingprieltlwde.i.i >^.6
35. Whereby he IS able to faucthofe
Vvhich come vnto God by h\m,i.\6.\6
8.1. But this is the Aim of that which'
V vc haue ('p<3kcn: that we hauc luch
an high Prieft, that fitteth on the
right hand of the throne of maicftie
in hcauen. 1.16,1%
5, See, quoth he, that thou make all
things according to the patcrne that
was shewed thee in the mountarne.
1.7.1
4. But now our hie prieft hath obtai-
ned a more excellent office, in as
much as heisthe mediator of a bet-
ter Ttftament,?tc. 2. 16.12
f,\. The rirlt tcttament had alfo ordi-
naunccs of religion , and a worldly
fanftii;^.ry. ' ' 4.14121
7, But into the f?condc went the hie
. prieft alone once cuery ycare , not
without blood which he offered
for hiaifelfe and for the people. 2.7
i7.&2.i5.<S
Z. VVherby the holy Ghoft thisfigni
fied,that the way into the holicit of
all. wa;.. not yet opened, whilcft as
yet the hrit tabernacle was landing.
2.7.17.& 2.15 6
^, Wherein were ofFred gifrcs & (a-
crifices that coulde not make holy,
coccrning chccorifcicnccofhimthat
did the fcruice.- 2.7.17.2^ z.>i.4.& 4
i4,a5
II. But Chrift being come a hie prieft
of good things to cctfnc,&c. i.\C.i6
& 4.14.21.& 4.18.S
«. Neither by the blood of goatesfic
calues, but by nis own blood entred he
«ncc into the holy placc^.i7.48c4.i8. |
1 able,
I J. For if the blood ofbulles & goats^
& theaiThcs ofanheifer fprinkiioga
them that are vncleane,fandificthat
touchingthe purificatio of the flesh.
i.17.4
14. HoTve Biuch more shall the blood
of chrift, which through cheecer
nail fpirire offered himfelfe without
lpottoGod,&c.2.i6.6.& J.16.3.&4
14. 22
15. And for this caufehe is the me-
diator of a nevve Teftament , that
through deach,&c. 2.7.17.&4.17.4
16- For where a reftamentis, there
mul^ be the death of him that made
the teltamcnt. 4-»^'5
22. And all thinges almoft accordinge
to the lav ve, was purified by blood,
& withoutshcdingcof blood there
was no remiflion. 2.1 5.6. & a. 17. 4
i6. Bur now once in the cede of th«
world hath he appercd to put away
fin bytheratrificcofhimfelf.4.iJ>'.|
27. And as it is ordained for men thac
they $hal once die,& afterthat com*
meth the iudgemet.s 16.17. & 3.25.8
28. So Chrill was once offrcd to take
avvay the finnes of many , and vnto
them that looke for him,shall he ap.
pcire the fecond time without finne
rnto filudtion. 3«*5'»
1 0.1, Forthelavvhauing the shadow
of good things to come, and not the
yeryiroage of the thinges, can neuef
▼vith thofe facrifices which they
offer yearcly, fandifie thecommer»
thcreto.2.7.i6,i7.&2 ii.4,&4.T4.2j
a. For would they not then haue ccaf-
fed to haue bin offered becaufe that
the offerers once purged , shoulde
haue hadde no more confcience of
finne. 3.i^.i5.& 4 10. }.& 4.i4>a5
4. For the blood ofbulles and goates
cannot takeaway finne. 4.14.25
7.TlienI(aid,loe,I come (in the begin-
ning of the booke it is written of mc>
that I shold do, 6 God,thy wil. 2. i tf. 5
8. Abouc,vvhen he faid,facriHce,and
offerings, & burnt offerings, & finne
offeringesjthou rrouldeli not haue,
ocitfa:r hail chou pleafure therein
fvhich
•rn
The
7hicharcofFrcdbythcIaw,&c.2.i<).5
«o. By the which will vvc artf fanflii-
fiedjcucn by che offering of the body
ofChnftoncc midc.j.6.iJc ^.li.i
14. For with once offering he hath
confecraced foreuer, thoic that are
fan^ified. 3.5.2.& 4.1S.;
i^. Wherefore brethren, fcing wc
haue liberty to enter the holy place
through the blood of lefus. 3,20.10
to. By the new and iiuing vvayvvhich
he hath prepared for vs through che
vaile,th;itis,his fleshe. j 20. 1 8
»<5, If we fin willingly after th.Jt we
haue reccaued the knowledge of
the truth , there remaineth no more
facrificeforfinne. j.j.2i,2 3.Si: 4183
17. But a fearful looking for of iudge-
menc , and violent hre which shall
deuouretheaduerfarics. 3.25.12
»9. Of how much more forer punishc-
ment thinkeycjshall he be vvorth\'_,
which trcadeth vndcr foote the
fonnc of God.ac\dco'rjteth the blood
of the tcftamcnt as an vnholy thing,
whcrevvith he was fanftified , and
doth dcfpife the fpint of grace, j.
3.2<
|<5. Ye haue necdeof pacience ,that
after yeihaue done che vvill of God,
• yemightreccaucthepromifes,5 2.37
II. I. Now'c faith is the ground of
things that are hoped for, and the
euidcnce of things chat are not fenc.
3.2.41. & 3.25. c
|. By faith we vnderlUnd , that the
vvorld was made by the word of
God,inruch fort, that che things that
vvercCjWcre not made of things that
didappeare. 1.5.13.& i.6.i.&. 1.16./
6, Without faith it is vnpoJijble to
pleafe him , for he that commeth tp
God muft belcuc that God is, & that
.he doth reward them that fckehim,
J.II.I5.& 3.t4,4.& 3.i0.40
J. By faith wc being warned qCGq4
of the things which Were as yet not
feene,&c, i?-*jO
^, Ky faith he abode in cheUd of pra>
mife as a(traunger,&c. a.to.x)
17. By faith Abraham offered vp Ifaac,
v^yhen le vyas tried, and he that Had
rtceaud the promifcs , offered his
onelybgoctenfonnc. i*9^
21. He worshipped God leaning vpoa
his ftafV. i.ii.iS
II. 3 . Conidcr him therefore that indu-
red fuel fpeaking againfl of finncrs,
lead ye hould be wearied and faint
in yournindes. 3*3»'5
5. And ycu haue forgotten the cxhor-
tation', rvhich fpeakcthvnco you .i>
vnto cHldren : My fohne » dcCpirc
not the chaftening of the lorde,
neither aint in thy mind when thou
artreprauedof hin-. ,3.4^ t
8. For ifyoubc without cori'ediion,
whereaallarepartaVcrsjthenareye
baftard«s andnotfoimes. > ? 8,^
«). MorO(Uer,vvehauchad the fathers
rf our todies , Tvhich corredled vc,
and we taue them reucrence, should
we not Duch rather be in fubicftion
vnto the father of fpirits , that vvp
might liue? I.i5.>
17. F«r ye kiowe howe that afterward
when hc.yxould haue inherited th^
blefling,hc was reic6ied,for he foud
noplace to repent , ahhough hec
foughi: the bleiling with teares. 3,
1 8. Forye came not to the mount that
might be touched , nor vnto burning
fire, nor tobiacknefle,and dafknefTe,
&c. *•?'•*
22. But'y,; came to the mount Sion,
'and to-,theCiric of the lining God,
the celciliall lerufalem , and to the
copany of innumerable Angcls.1. 14.9
13. To the cpiigregation of the firft
borne which arc written inheauen,
and to God the iudge of all. 3.25.^
13,4, Manage is honorable amongeil
all men ,and the bed vndcfiled : but
vvhoorcmogers and adulterers God
o v*ill iudje. 4.5>.i4.& 4.i2.2$.&4>
S. Tcfiis Chrift the fame yeftcrday, and
to day.and alfo for eucr. i 10.4
1 5. By him therefore let vs daily offer
vp to God the facrificcofpraire,that
isjthcfrutcof the lips, which con.
AAA A A iij
The Tabic. ,^a,
feife Rij name. j.ao.i^.8e.i.i 8.i(f,i7 though a man fayliehath faith, when
t6. To do good, and to difl-jbate for-
get not :,(firvvJth fMcfr facriRces
God'Upltjfedi ^i.'il!:3«&,3.7.5.& j.
-.-:>.. i5..<!&4't8.'7
17. Obey yoiir guides and'fe ruleS by
therAj'for tRey watch fti^tS.chelth
■ oryHur1oa1e'i,as iuch cfia-sball gcuc
' accompt therefore. ' ^ 1.15 a
';;r-A M i?;*s.t'
*•*** \/f^ brethren, rdnntltfor an cx-
» ceding; ii,y To cftcn as you
fall mro diners cemv-taticjfis 5;.20.4<J
la. EJeffed ii'the.rn'an th^t luffereth
tcmptarion , for' when he shall be
trjed,h£ she'll rtceatic ;b«^rovvncof
liFc. - '■*^r '3.</.io
ij. Let ho manvvhcft he « tempted
fay , that he is tempted cJF God , for
God can'fiot1)eti,mp*cd*vith euils,
nclthrj- ^^tft^e'itCirjpr any man.- 5.
{4. Butccheoheis temptsd whcnhc
isdjay</cn.avvay by hrs'ov\-ne con-
<upifcence,Jhd is chtifeli. 1,1046
15. -"Tlicri when lu'rt h'athjconceaucd,
it brhjgeth forth frnnt ^ and finne
'vvRv^h'tH^ finished , beirigcth forth
deathi-" •' \ ^ '" ' '' '' ' ' 3-3-M
f* iuefy goo!^>gift andeueryperfe^
./Si fil^lnetHirfckttj-iibbac.from the
fath'if 6fH:^hte%VvVi,^h vx-hom thfcrc
is ndvarisSiettefTe/ neither shadoyvc
by turning, i.ij. S.^ra. a.ji. & 4.
1 4.1 o
ar. Whercforcliy apart allmkliciouf
nelTc and fuperflnitic of m-ilfcjouf
ncfTe,-«id I'cceaue'VVjth mdccnekTe
the V Tor d that is ihgtafced in youj
vvhith isvablc, to fatfie your fooJcs.
, •••-^--^--•.. 4.,7.,5
a . 5 Hath not God chofctflhe poorc of
this woiJd, that they should be riche
infaith,anJhcircs ofthe kingdome
vvhith he promifed co thofe of who
laeiSjbcloued. 3:»3.i?
10. For vvhofoeuer shall ke<;i>e the
whole lavre »and yet failethin one
point ;he is giltie of all. 3,1 4,10. &
}. 18.10
14* VVhataaaillethic faimmy brethre.
h? hath no vvorke$,can the faitli
fauehim? ^.z.fyit
if. Thou beleueft there is one God,
thou doei^ vvcll,& the dcuils beleue
and tremble. 3.».io
II. VVasnot Abraham our father iu-
llified thorovvc vvorkes, when he
offered vp iiaac hisfounc vppon the
olta? 3.17'U
4.3 . You afke and you receaue not, be*
cauie you afke amiife that ycm»ght
confume itonyourluftes. J.ao.T
6, But the Scnpturt- offereth mor^
grace , and therefore faith , God re-
fii-Uth the proude , and gcueth grace!
10 t!>e humble; a. a. 10. & 3.11. f
8.' Dravve ny to God , and he will
drawc ny to you:cleanle your hades
ye fianers , and purge your hartes y»
vvauering minded. J-?-^^
!H He that fpeaketh euillof his bro-
ther, fpcakcth againft the lavvc, and
condcmn'eth jf:feu^ if cHpu coif-rone
the lavvc,&c. 4>0 7
11. There is one laTve gcuer thitis
' ablctofaucand todfftroy. 410.7
14. V'/ho ran. nor tell what shall be
the next day, for what is your life?
it is eucnavapor,&c. 3.20.28
15. Fofthat yeonght to fay,if thclwrd
•will, and if we Iiuc,vve vvil do this
orrbat, j.so.aiJ
f.f-i. Before all things, my brethren,
fvvf are not , neither by heauen,
neither by earth, neither any other
othc , but let your yea be yea , and
your nay n ay, &c. z.^.2 6
t'3. li a'ly man afflifl^ed amongeft you?
let him pray : is any man mcry ? let
' him fing Pfalmes. J 'o-T
»'4.' 1$ any fickc amongeft you ? let hini
fend for the Elders of the Church,
and let them pray fur him,&c« 4.15.
•■■■■■■ ' '■:"''_ ' 18,21
I J, And the praier for faith shall faut
the ficke, and the lord shall raife him
vp.and if he haue committed finne,it
shall be forgeuen him. }.ao.fl
16. Acknowledge your faultes one
CO an other,& pray one for an other^
that
The Tabic.
that ye may be healed : for the praier
of a righteous man auailech much, if
icbeferuent. j. 4.6, ia.& ^.20.27
t7. tlias was a man fubiedl to thofe
things that we be > and he praied
eaxnciily chac it might noc raine, and
it rained not on the earth for she
fpace of three ycare and fixe mo-
nethes. 3.20.26
I. PETER.
i.i. "TO the eleSk according to the
foreknowledge of God the
father vnto fanftificatioof the ipirit,
through obedience and fprir.kUng of
the blood of lefus Chriii , grace and
peace be multiphed vnto you. 3.1.1.
& l.i4,6.Sc i.aa.tf.Sc 4 x 5*2
3. Blelfed be God the fachcr of our
lorde Ie(u Chrifl , who of his great
mercy bach begot vs againe into a
liuely hope , by the refurre^ionof
ChnUIcfufromdeach. 2.i6,i|
5, Who arc kept by the power of
God through taich to faluation,
vvhicl>.7,'p-'c'pitc<i CO be declared in
thelafttfmc. }.».4i.& J.iS.j
y. That the rriall of your faith , being
much more faithfuUcr then the triaU
ofgolde w hi chpcrishcth, although
itbe tried by fire. 3'8.4
p. Receauing the cnde of your faith,
euen the faluacion of your foulei. i*
i$.a.& )a8.3-& 3-25*i
II. Searching when or what time the
fpirite which teiiified before of
Chrill , which was in them , should
declare the fuffering chac should
come vnto chrift,&c.i.i3,i8.& 2.^,1
la. Vnto whom it was reueiled, that
they should not minifter vnto them-
felucs, but vnto vs the things which
arenovv shewed vnto you by thew.
1 9.1.& a. 11.^
15, But as he which hath called you
is holy, fo beyouholyinallmanerof
cnnucrfacion. h^*i
16, Be you holy, for I am holy, j.^.a
li. Knowing that ye were not re-
deemed with corruptible things, as
filuer and gold, from your vaine con-
uerfdcion,i£c«4ucd by the ccadicios
of the fathers. 5.i7»5
15. But with the precious blood of
ChriA ,as of a lambe vndeiiled and
vvithoutfpot. 2.17.5. & 5.6.3
«o. VVhichwas ordained before ihc
foundation of the world, but was
declared in the lad times for your
fakes* 3. 22. ^.& 4.18.20
31. Which by his meanes do beleue
in God that raifed him vp from the
dead, and gaae him glory , that your
faith and hope might be in God. 2 i6.
I 3.& 3.2.1,4;
22. Seing your foules are purified by
obeymg the truth through the fpint,
with brotherly loue without fai-
iiing. i.i;.2.&: 2.5.11
23 Being borne aga>nc,not of mortal!
(eede,but of immortalijby the word
of the lining God ^who liueth and
endurethfor euer. 2.10,7.8; 4 t^.dc
4.16.18,31
2.5> And yeasliuelyltones,bemadea
(pirituallhoufe.&c, 4.6.5.&4.i8,i4!»
5. But ye jrea chofen generation^*
kingly priefthoodc , a holy nation ,^*
people that God hath chalenged to
himfclfe , that you should ^hcvve
forth tin vertues of him which hath
called you from darkneflc into hi»
vvonderfuil light. 2.7.1.&1.13.2.&
4.18.17.5:4.19.25
XJ. Beloued , I pray you as pilgrimcs
and ftrangers,that you abflaine fronj
the luftcs of the flcshe, which ftriue
againft the foule. i .1 5-*
13 Be you fubieft vnto euerie ordi-
nance of man for the lorde s fake,
whether it be to the King , as to the
fuperior. 4.20.23
17. Honor all mcn,loue brotherl^nes,
feare God,honor the King. 4.20.7
21. Chrifthath fuflferedfor vs, leuing
vs an example that vve should fol-
lovve his fteppes. 3.16.2
24. Who bore our finnes vpponhis
body on the crolte ,that wee being
dead to finne, might liuetorightc-
oufncfle ; by whofe ftripes ye art
healed. >.i6.6.& 2.17.4*31 3.4,i<J.&:
j,^.27.& 3.4-30.&4.I4 2I
A AAA A iiij
The Tabic.
a $. You were as ftraicd shepe , but
novvc yebetourned to your shcpc-
herde and bishop of your foulcs. i.
I 5.2 & 3.2^(5
3,7. Likevvifeye Hufbands,vfe your
feltiss , a«: it becommcch men of
knowledge , g^ing honor to the
vvonia,as to i.ie weaker velTelJj&c.
4.20.19
1?. For Chrifl fuf^jrcd once for finnes,
tbeiuftfo.r the vniutl, thathemighc
bringc vs to God, and was put to.
death concerning the fleihjbutliued
according to the fpirit. 2.1^.2
15. By the vvnich hec alfo went , and
preached to the fpirits that were in
prifon. , 2.1 ^;9
»x. To the which alfo the figure that
nowc faueth vs , euen Baptifme
agrcethf^not the ptirtinge away of
the filthe of the flcshe , but in that
a good confciencf mak^rth rcqueft
to Ood^ by the refurredioii of lefus
Chrift. j.t5».i5.3i 4.10.J & 4.1 4.4.
& 4.14.14.& 41 5.1.&4.16 1;
4. 3, It is enough tor vs that in the fore-
parte of our life , vvc haue liued ac -
cording to the luft of the Gentiles,
when we walked in, &c, J. 15.8. & 3.
24.) I
8. Before all things haue feruenfiioue
amongeft voii , for loue couercth the
multitude oi^^finne.' 3-4, ji.& 3.4 i<5
10. Let euery man as he hath rccea
ued the gift ,minjfter the fame one
to an othtr , ai good difpofersof the
manifolde graces oi God. 3.7. 5
11. Tf an y man tpeakc j let him fpeake
3s the wordes of God. j.8 $.& 4.
17. For ''ime is come , that iud^emcnt
muit begjiinc .^t the houTc of God,
if fo be It he^in firft vvith vs , vvhat
shall be tre cndt?«.c. 3.4-34
5. !• The tldcjs which be amongcfi
you, I befechc alfo that am an elder,
2. Feede the flocke of God which de-
pendeth vppon you- 4.6.3.5c 4.10.17
_ Not as though ye were lordes ouer
Gods heritage. 4'4.^.& 4.10.7
5. God re (ift eth the proude,& geucth
grace vnto, the humble. 3''"**5
6. Humble your felues vnder the mighty
ha nd of God, that he may exalte vou
in due time. 3»*-4o
7. Hauing all your care caftvpon him,
heecarcthforyou. 1.17.6
8. Be ye (obre , and watche, for your
aduerfarie the Deuill , as a roaring
Lion walking about , feketh whom
he may deuoure. i,4.i8.& 1.14.13.
& J.'2 0.4tf
10. And the God of all grace, which
hath called vs vnto his etcrnall glory
in Chritt lefus , after ye haue fuf-
fcred a little ,makc you perfect, &c.
5.20.4$
n. P ET F. R.
1.4. \7'\7'Herel>y moft great andpre-
tious piomifes be geuen
vs, that by Uiem wee should bepar-
takers of the godly nature, &c. j.ii.
10. & 3»i5'i<>
5. Therefore gcue euen all diligence
vertue to your faith, & vvith vcctuc,
knowledge. 2,5.11
10. VVheri fore brethren ,giu8 rather
diligence to make your caijingeand
election Aire : for if you do thefe
things, you shall neuer fall. 315.?
14, Seing I knovvc the time is ac
hande , that I mufl lay dovvne this
my tabernacle, as the lorde Icftis de-
cli3redvntome. 3.2S-tf
ip. We haue alfo a moft fure word of
the prophets , to the which you do
well that you take hccde, as vnto a
light that shincth in a darke plac«
vntill theday davvne,&c. i.p.Z
21. For the prophccic came not in oldc
time by the will of man, but holy
men of God fpakc as they vvcra
moued by the holy Ghoft. J.13.7.&
1.13,1$
2. 1. There were falfe pr^iphets amogeft
the people, as amongeft you there
shalbe falCe teachers,&c •4*5)'4
4. If God fpared not the Angells that
Imned , but caft them dovvne into
hell ) and dcliuered them into the
chainef
The Tabic.
<;hainesof^arkenefl'e,8cc. i.i4.i6.&
i.i4.i>.
jf. The Lordeknovvethhovv to <leli-.
uerchc godly out of temptation. 3*
20.4<>
I5>, Ofvvhome foeueramanis ouer-
. comf ,cue of the Oimc he is brought
into bondage. z. 2.S.
3.4, Where is the promife of his com-
ining? for fince tnefathcrs died, all
. thit;g?s continew ahke from the
btj^inniiifj&c. j.a,4Z.
8. Dearly beloued, be not ignorant
ijfthisone thing, that one dayisvvith
the Lordasa tnoufandyeares, and a
chourandycaresasoncday. 3 2 42,
5. And vvr-ild hatie no man to perishe,
but wold haue ail men to come to
fcpcncance. 1.24.15.
t. I O H N.
I.I. HTHat which was from the b«-
Ijinninge, that we hauc hcatd,
that vve haiie feene with our eyes,
that vvc haue bchelde , .md that our-
hands haue handled of the \Torde of
life. 2.i4.2,& a.i4.7.&4X7-8,
^. That ifwevvalkenn the iiohr ss he
is in the light , we h.iue mutuiil! Fe
lovvship.and the bioodo^his {onne
lefuChriltcpurgethvs fro alHinne.
2.I7.4.& ?.5.2.& 41411
5. Ifvvcconfefl'eourfinncs,heis faith -
/uU and iuft, fo that he will forgeuc
v; our f!;)nes,5fc. j.4.j).Si_ 3.10 5.
i«. Ifvvc fay vvehauenolinnfc, vvee
makehimaliar.&c. j.2045
J.I. If anymanhaucfin ,vvchauC3n
aduocatc with the father leftss
Chrii^ the righteous. J .4.2^, & 3,20,
?.. Ke IS the propitiation for our finnes
and not for cures onely , but for the
finiies of the whole world. 2.^7. a,
& J.4.26.& 5.ao.20.
J 2. I write vnto you lirle childrcn,by •
caufe your finnes be forgeuen you
for his name fake. 3,17. 5.& 3.4.25,
18 Litlechildren,itis thelafttimej&
as you haue heard , Anqchrift shall
i^. They went out from , vs but they
vvtrenotof vs:for ifthcy had ben of
vs , they wold haue continued with
vs,occ. J.J.2J.& 3.14.6.7,
20. But ye hauc an ointement fro him
th.n is holie,& you know all things.
a J. VVhofoeuer denieth the fonne,
the fame hath not the father. 2.6.4,
27. But the ointment that you haue
receaued ofhim ,abidcth in you, net*
thcrnccde you th^t any mantcacha
you , but as the iame oyntment tea-
chcthyou,&c. ?•'•?•
3 I. Bcholde, what louc the father
hath shewed on vs, tliat wc should
be called thefounes of God, for this
caufe the woi-ldc knowcth you not
bycaufc itknowethuothim. 36 3.
Sc 3.20.35.
2. Denrhe beloued, we are nowc th«
fon.MCs of Godjbiit yet it dothenot
appcarc what wc shall be:andyvc
knowe, that when be shal appcareJ
i- vve5ha!bel!kchini : for we shall fee
him as he is, 6fc i.5 j.Sf J.2.14.&
J.II.lO.Sf 3.2 510.& 4.li<.20j
3, Andeuerynian that hathe this hope
in him, purgcthhim icife cuen as he
is pure. 3.15 1,1
8. H. that comtTiiitti! finne is of the':.
deuiJi,for the deuiil finnethfiom the
bCj:;iiK»iige,but the fonnc of God,
&c. i.«4-»5-J8.t9.&5.i5.8.
$ VVhofoeuer is borne of God/inncth
n':£,for his f'ctdc rctrsayneth in him,
nfither can he finne , bycaufehe is
borneofOod. 1.3.TO.S: J.5.11.
10. In tiiisare the ciuidrcn of God
knowen , and the children t»f the
deuill,&c. 114.19.&: 3,i5.2«
1 5. Who fo hateth his brother , is 4
mankiller , & ye know that no man-
killcr hath etcrnali life abiding in
him. 9.8.39.
16. Hereby haue vvepcrceiuedloue,
that he laid downc his life forvs,
thcrforc wc ought alfo to lay downe
cue lyuesforthe brethcren. 2.14 2.
20. Forifour hearts condemnevs, God
is mightier the our beart,& knowecii
The Tabic.
all things. ?-4-i8.
t%. And vA'hatfocucrvrcaske, were-
cciuc of him , bycaufe vvc kepe his
conimaundcmcnts, &c. j. 20.7.10.
• 4. He that kepech hfscofnmaundc'
Dients,dvTelleth in him , and hee in
him:and by this we know , that hce
dvvclleth in v5,euc by the fpirit that
he hathgcucnvs. l.^'^Sc ^.1.^9.
4.1. Derely bcloiiedjhcleucnot eucry
- fpiritc , but prouc tlicfpirits whe-
"therthey bwCof God,&c. 4.9,12.
|. What fpirite foeucr confcflcth not
that Chriil lefus is come io the flesh
is notofGod. 4.17.^2.
S o. Herein is loue, not that vvc loucd
God.buc chache loucd vs , &c.2. 17.
a.& J 14 <5.
11. Dcrdybeloucd,»f God fbloued vs,
vvc ought to louc one an other. 3.
I J. By this we know that vre d\'vell
in him and he in vs, bycaufe he hath
geuen vs of hi» fpirite. 3.1.4.& j.
24.2,
1 8. There is no fcare in loue,but per.
fc(SK»uecafttth out fcare, for fcare
hath p.iynfulnes, and he that fcareth,
6c c. I.l.ij.
sp We loue him, bycaufe he loued
^ vs firft. 2.i6. J.
5.4. Whaifocuecis borne of God,
ouercomrneth tlicvvorjdc ,andth^s
is the vidlorie that ouercomcth the
vvorldc,euenyourf4yth. 1.18.J.& x.
5 II.& ? 2.21.
6. This is t^arCl.nftc lefus whichc
came by water and blood, &C.4.14,
7. There be three vvhiche bearc vviic-
rc« in hcau5,t.hcPather,the Word,'
and the hoiy Ghod, andthofc three
be one- 3.1.1.
t. And there be thr?c that bcarcwit-
nes in earth, the fpirite, the water &
theblood :«nd thcfe three agree in
one. j.i.i.
12. He which hath the fonne,hathhfe,
but he that harh not the fonne of God
hachnothfe in him ^.i^.^Sc 3.1 $.6.
14. And this is the aiiurjuice that vvc
haue in him , chat if vye aske anf
thing according to his will , he hea-
reih vs,&c. J.20.J,
1 5. Andif weknovve that he heareth
vs,vvhatfoctier we aske,vvc know
thatvve haue the petition that vve
hauedeiiredofhim. 3.20.53*
iS. He that is borne of God, krpeth
himfelfe. 2.5.11,
ip. VVcknowevvebeofGod,andthc
whoU vvorlde lyeth in vvickcdnes.
J. 1,14.
20. The feme is verie God and life ctcr.
nail. i.ij.fi.atf
21* Babes kepe your fclucs fi-om idols.
Amen. 1.11.12,
T I. I O H N.
1 .7. \/f Anic deceiuers are entred into
rhe vvorlde, vvhiche confefl'e
not that lefus Cbnft is come in th«
^eshe. 4.17.32^
- Thegenerall Epmie t/ludr. x
16. THe Angels alfo which kept not
their firft cftatc but left their
ovvne habitation, he hath referyed
in euerlafting chaincs vnder dark*-
nes,vntothe ludgemcnt of the great
day,&c.i.i4.i6,& i.i4.ij,& 3.25.*
5. Y'ct MichacJl the Archangell,vvhctt
he flroue againfl thedeuill, anddif^
puted about the bodie of Mof<:s.
dur/l not blame him with curfed
fpe.iking,but fayd, the Lordc rcbul^i
chec. 1. 14.9.^ 1.14.11^
Th* \euelaUon efS. lohm
1.5. TTO him that louedvs, and VV3
hed vs from oure iinnes byh^
-"^.Wood, 4.14.21
6. Andmadc7skingesandprieftest«
Godhis.fa:her. 2.15,^.5: 4.18. »^
J. I 3. And ail the Creatures that aro]
in heauen ,and on the earth, 5: vnder^
theearth.and inthefea.anaall that
are in them, heard I,faying,&c.j.5.8
7,14. Thefc be they that came out of
great affiidbion , and haue wafThcd
their longc robes , and haue made
them white in the blood of theLabe.
3.5 a*
1 3.5, And a mouth was giue him that
fpak; grcdc chinge-s & biafphemies.
47»
ThclTablc.
14, 1 J. Bleffedarerhe dead hereafter,
thofclTay, that dye for the Lordes
fake.Huen fo fayeth the (pirit:for they
rcU from their labours. ?.^^o.
18.6. Reward her as she hath rewar-
ded you, and double vnto iier double
accordinge vnto her workes .5.5.^.
l5).io. And I fell before his fcete,thac
1 might worship him : but he fayed
vnto mce , fee thou doc it not , I am
thy fellow feruant& one of thybre-
thcren which hath the tcftiroonie of
Iefus:vvorship God.i.i3. j.& 1.14.10
20,4. And I fawe fcartcs:and they fat
vjjponthe,& ludgement was geuen
vnto ihem, and I fa we the foulesof
chenv that were beheaded for tiie
rv'itnes of Iefus,and for the word of
Ood , & which did not worship the
bcaftneythcrhis Image, neither had
taken his markevpontheirforheads,
oron their handes , and theyliued,
And raigQcd with Chxiiie a ihoufand
ytares. h^S-S*
21.27. ^^^ there shall enter into it no
vnclcane thing, neither whatfocuer
vvorkcth abomination or lies :buc
they that arc written in the L^mbes
boKeoflifc. 4,i<J.i7.
aa.8. But 1, when I had heard & fecnc
thefc ihinges,! fell downc to wor-
ship before the featc of the Angell
wbiche shevTcd me thefc thingcs. I.
12. J. & 1,14.10,
p. But he fayd vnto mee, fee thou doc
it not, for I am thy fellowc feruaunt,
and one of thy brcthercn the Pro-
phets,&c 1. 14.10.
18. If any man shall adde vnto thefc
things, God shall adde vnto him the
plages that are wiittcn in this boke.
4 9.x.
I5>. Andifany m.in shall dsminishe
of the vvordts of the boke of this
prophccie , God shall take away
his parte out ofthcboksof life, &c«
4-5>.a.
FINIS.
d^i
Haejl the Archk..
M^^ A-^*^ ""^ '
:.■ ^ /-'^^JT^ViA;
.^'
•*.i^*;V ■
:?^
"^^
Jl
V
a7
1
Bk-.
^^-
^-
i ft
'#ii
^
i
n
Ki
«
■'
1
r-
r »1
Is
r-i
;^^'
■•^'
ai^
3 %ji^'- ;#'
^m- ^'-
yK.